natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
When such devices are connected to publicly available electronic communications networks or make use of electronic communications services as a basic infrastructure, the relevant provisions of Directive 2002/58/EC (Directive on privacy and electronic communications), including those on security, traffic and location data and on confidentiality, should apply.
Če se take naprave priključi na javno dostopna elektronska komunikacijska omrežja ali če uporabljajo elektronske komunikacijske storitve kot osnovno infrastrukturo, bi se morale uporabljati ustrezne določbe Direktive 2002/58/ES (Direktiva o zasebnosti in elektronskih komunikacijah), vključno z določbami o varnosti, podatkih o prometu in lokaciji ter o zaupnosti.
The provider of a publicly available electronic communications service should take appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure the security of its services.
Ponudnik javno razpoložljive elektronske komunikacijske storitve bi moral sprejeti ustrezne tehnične in organizacijske ukrepe, da zagotovi varnost svojih storitev.
Without prejudice to Directive 95/46/EC, such measures should ensure that personal data can be accessed only by authorised personnel for legally authorised purposes, and that the personal data stored or transmitted, as well as the network and services, are protected.
Brez poseganja v Direktivo 95/46/ES bi bilo treba s takšnimi ukrepi zagotoviti, da bi imelo dostop do osebnih podatkov le pooblaščeno osebje za pravno dovoljene namene, in da so shranjeni ali preneseni osebni podatki ter omrežja in storitve zaščiteni.
Moreover, a security policy with respect to the processing of personal data should be established in order to identify vulnerabilities in the system, and monitoring and preventive, corrective and mitigating action should be regularly carried out.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba določiti varnostno politiko za obdelavo osebnih podatkov, da bi odkrili pomanjkljivosti sistema, poskrbeti pa bi morali tudi za redno spremljanje in izvajanje preventivnih, korektivnih in blažilnih ukrepov.
The competent national authorities should promote the interests of citizens by, inter alia, contributing to ensuring a high level of protection of personal data and privacy.
Pristojni nacionalni organi bi morali spodbujati interese državljanov med drugim tako, da prispevajo k zagotavljanju visoke ravni varstva osebnih podatkov in zasebnosti.
To this end, competent national authorities should have the necessary means to perform their duties, including comprehensive and reliable data about security incidents that have led to the personal data of individuals being compromised.
V ta namen bi morali imeti pristojni nacionalni organi potrebna sredstva za opravljanje svojih nalog, vključno z obsežnimi in zanesljivimi podatki o varnostnih incidentih, ki so ogrozili osebne podatke posameznikov.
They should monitor measures taken and disseminate best practices among providers of publicly available electronic communications services.
Spremljati bi morali sprejete ukrepe in razširjati najboljše prakse med ponudniki javno dostopnih elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev.
Providers should therefore maintain an inventory of personal data breaches to enable further analysis and evaluation by the competent national authorities.
Ponudniki bi zato morali hraniti popis podatkov o kršitvah varnosti osebnih podatkov, da bi pristojnim nacionalnim organom omogočili nadaljnje analiziranje in ocenjevanje.
Community law imposes duties on data controllers regarding the processing of personal data, including an obligation to implement appropriate technical and organisational protection measures against, for example, loss of data.
V zakonodaji Skupnosti so določene dolžnosti kontrolorjev podatkov glede obdelave osebnih podatkov, vključno z dolžnostjo izvajanja ustreznih tehničnih in organizacijskih zaščitnih ukrepov pred, na primer, izgubo podatkov.
The data breach notification requirements contained in Directive 2002/58/EC (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) provide a structure for notifying the competent authorities and individuals concerned when personal data has nevertheless been compromised.
Zahteve glede priglasitve kršitev varnosti podatkov iz Direktive 2002/58/ES (Direktiva o zasebnosti in elektronskih komunikacijah) zagotavljajo strukturo za obveščanje pristojnih organov in zadevnih posameznikov, kadar so bili osebni podatki vseeno ogroženi.
Those notification requirements are limited to security breaches which occur in the electronic communications sector.
Zahteve glede priglasitve so omejene na kršitve varnosti na področju elektronskih komunikacij.
However, the notification of security breaches reflects the general interest of citizens in being informed of security failures which could result in their personal data being lost or otherwise compromised, as well as of available or advisable precautions that they could take in order to minimise the possible economic loss or social harm that could result from such failures.
Priglasitev kršitev varnosti pa odraža splošni interes državljanov, da so obveščeni o kršitvah varnosti, ki lahko povzročijo izgubo osebnih podatkov ali jih drugače ogrozijo, in da so obveščeni o razpoložljivih ali priporočljivih previdnostnih ukrepih, s katerimi lahko zmanjšajo možno gospodarsko izgubo ali družbeno škodo, ki bi lahko nastala zaradi takih kršitev.
The interest of users in being notified is clearly not limited to the electronic communications sector, and therefore explicit, mandatory notification requirements applicable to all sectors should be introduced at Community level as a matter of priority.
Splošni interes državljanov o obveščenosti seveda ni omejen na področje elektronskih komunikacij, zato bi se morala prednostno preučiti potreba po izrecnih, obveznih zahtevah priglasitve, ki bi veljale za ostala področja na ravni Skupnosti.
Pending a review to be carried out by the Commission of all relevant Community legislation in this field, the Commission, in consultation with the European Data Protection Supervisor, should take appropriate steps without delay to encourage the application throughout the Community of the principles embodied in the data breach notification rules contained in Directive 2002/58/EC (Directive on privacy and electronic communications), regardless of the sector, or the type, of data concerned.
Dokler Komisija ne pregleda vse bistvene zakonodaje Skupnosti na tem področju, bi morala v posvetovanju z Evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov takoj začeti z ustreznimi ukrepi za spodbujanje uporabe načel, zajetih v predpisih o priglasitvi kršitev varnosti podatkov iz Direktive 2002/58/ES (Direktiva o zasebnosti in elektronskih komunikacijah), v vsej Skupnosti, ne glede na sektor ali vrsto podatkov.
Competent national authorities should monitor measures taken and disseminate best practices among providers of publicly available electronic communications services.
Pristojni nacionalni organi bi morali spremljati sprejete ukrepe in razširjati najboljšo prakso med ponudniki javno razpoložljivih elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev.
A personal data breach may, if not addressed in an adequate and timely manner, result in substantial economic loss and social harm, including identity fraud, to the subscriber or individual concerned.
Kršitev varnosti osebnih podatkov lahko, če se ne obravnava ustrezno in pravočasno, zadevnemu naročniku ali posamezniku povzroči veliko gospodarsko izgubo in družbeno škodo, vključno z zlorabo identitete.
Therefore, as soon as the provider of publicly available electronic communications services becomes aware that such a breach has occurred, it should notify the breach to the competent national authority.
Zato bi moral ponudnik javno razpoložljivih elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev, takoj ko ugotovi, da je prišlo do takšne kršitve, to sporočiti pristojnemu nacionalnemu organu.
The subscribers or individuals whose data and privacy could be adversely affected by the breach should be notified without delay in order to allow them to take the necessary precautions.
Naročniki ali posamezniki, pri katerih bi take kršitve lahko negativno vplivale na njihove podatke in zasebnost, bi morali biti o tem nemudoma obveščeni, da bi lahko sprejeli potrebne varnostne ukrepe.
A breach should be considered as adversely affecting the data or privacy of a subscriber or individual where it could result in, for example, identity theft or fraud, physical harm, significant humiliation or damage to reputation in connection with the provision of publicly available communications services in the Community.
Za kršitev bi moralo veljati, da negativno vpliva na podatke in zasebnost uporabnikov ali posameznikov, kadar lahko pripelje na primer do kraje ali zlorabe identitete, fizične škode, resnega ponižanja ali škodovanja ugledu v zvezi z zagotavljanjem javno razpoložljivih komunikacijskih storitev v Skupnosti.
The notification should include information about measures taken by the provider to address the breach, as well as recommendations for the subscriber or individual concerned.
Obvestilo bi moralo vsebovati informacije o ukrepih, ki jih je za obravnavanje kršitve sprejel ponudnik, in priporočila za zadevnega naročnika ali posameznika.
When implementing measures transposing Directive 2002/58/EC (Directive on privacy and electronic communications), the authorities and courts of the Member States should not only interpret their national law in a manner consistent with that Directive, but should also ensure that they do not rely on an interpretation of it which would conflict with fundamental rights or general principles of Community law, such as the principle of proportionality.
Pri izvajanju ukrepov, ki prenašajo Direktivo 2002/58/ES (Direktiva o zasebnosti in elektronskih komunikacijah), bi morali organi in sodišča držav članic ne le razlagati nacionalno zakonodajo skladno z navedeno direktivo, temveč tudi zagotoviti, da se ne zanašajo na razlago navedene direktive, ki bi bila v nasprotju z drugimi temeljnimi pravicami ali splošnimi načeli zakonodaje Skupnosti, kot je načelo sorazmernosti.
Provision should be made for the adoption of technical implementing measures concerning the circumstances, format and procedures applicable to information and notification requirements in order to achieve an adequate level of privacy protection and security of personal data transmitted or processed in connection with the use of electronic communications networks in the internal market.
Predvideti bi bilo treba sprejetje tehničnih izvedbenih ukrepov glede okoliščin, oblike in postopkov, ki se uporabljajo za zahteve glede informacij in priglasitve, da bi dosegli ustrezno raven varstva zasebnosti in varnosti osebnih podatkov, ki se pošiljajo ali obdelujejo v povezavi z uporabo elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij na notranjem trgu.
In setting detailed rules concerning the format and procedures applicable to the notification of personal data breaches, due consideration should be given to the circumstances of the breach, including whether or not personal data had been protected by appropriate technical protection measures, effectively limiting the likelihood of identity fraud or other forms of misuse.
Pri določanju podrobnih pravil o obliki zapisa in postopkih, ki se uporabljajo za obvestilo o kršitvi varnosti osebnih podatkov, bi bilo treba ustrezno upoštevati okoliščine kršitve, vključno s tem, ali so bili osebni podatki zaščiteni z ustreznimi tehničnimi zaščitnimi ukrepi, ki učinkovito zmanjšujejo verjetnost zlorabe identitete ali drugih oblik zlorabe.
Moreover, such rules and procedures should take into account the legitimate interests of law enforcement authorities in cases where early disclosure could unnecessarily hamper the investigation of the circumstances of a breach.
Poleg tega bi morali pri takšnih pravilih in postopkih upoštevati zakonite interese organov kazenskega pregona, če bi zgodnje razkritje lahko po nepotrebnem oviralo preiskavo okoliščin kršitve.
Software that surreptitiously monitors the actions of the user or subverts the operation of the user’s terminal equipment to the benefit of a third party (spyware) poses a serious threat to the privacy of users, as do viruses.
Programska oprema, ki prikrito spremlja uporabnikova dejanja ali uničuje uporabnikovo terminalsko opremo v korist tretje stranke („vohunska programska oprema“), lahko resno ogroža zasebnost uporabnikov, enako kot virusi.
A high and equal level of protection of the private sphere of users needs to be ensured, regardless of whether unwanted spying programmes or viruses are inadvertently downloaded via electronic communications networks or are delivered and installed in software distributed on other external data storage media, such as CDs, CD-ROMs or USB keys.
Treba je zagotoviti visoko in enako raven varstva zasebnosti uporabnikov, ne glede na to ali so nezaželeni vohunski programi ali virusi preneseni sami od sebe prek elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij ali pa se dostavijo in namestijo skriti v programski opremi, ki se nahaja na drugih zunanjih nosilcih shranjevanja podatkov, kot so zgoščenke, CD-ROMi ali USB-ključi.
Member States should encourage the provision of information to end-users about available precautions, and should encourage them to take the necessary steps to protect their terminal equipment against viruses and spyware.
Države članice bi morale spodbujati obveščanje končnih uporabnikov o razpoložljivih varnostnih ukrepih in uporabnike spodbujati k ustreznim ukrepom za zaščito njihove terminalske opreme pred virusi in vohunsko programsko opremo.
Third parties may wish to store information on the equipment of a user, or gain access to information already stored, for a number of purposes, ranging from the legitimate (such as certain types of cookies) to those involving unwarranted intrusion into the private sphere (such as spyware or viruses).
Tretje strani si morebiti želijo shranjevati informacije o uporabnikovi opremi ali pridobiti dostop do že shranjenih podatkov iz najrazličnejših razlogov, ki zajemajo vse od legitimnih namenov (na primer določene vrste piškotkov) do tistih, ki obsegajo neupravičen vdor v zasebnost (na primer vohunska programska oprema ali virusi).
It is therefore of paramount importance that users be provided with clear and comprehensive information when engaging in any activity which could result in such storage or gaining of access.
Zato je izjemno pomembno, da so uporabniki jasno in izčrpno obveščeni pri vseh dejavnostih, ko bi lahko prišlo do takšnega shranjevanja ali dostopanja.
The methods of providing information and offering the right to refuse should be as user-friendly as possible.
Načini obveščanja in zagotavljanja pravice do zavrnitve bi morali biti čim bolj uporabniško prijazni.
Exceptions to the obligation to provide information and offer the right to refuse should be limited to those situations where the technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user.
Izjeme glede obveznosti obveščanja in zagotavljanja pravice do zavrnitve bi morale biti omejena na primere, ko je tehnično shranjevanje ali dostop nujno potreben za legitimni namen omogočanja uporabe posebne storitve, ki jo je izrecno zahteval naročnik ali uporabnik.
Where it is technically possible and effective, in accordance with the relevant provisions of Directive 95/46/EC, the user’s consent to processing may be expressed by using the appropriate settings of a browser or other application.
Uporabnikovo privolitev, da se strinja z obdelavo, je mogoče izraziti z uporabo ustreznih nastavitev v brskalniku ali drugih aplikacijah, in sicer v primeru, da je to tehnično izvedljivo in učinkovito ter v skladu z ustreznimi določbami Direktive 95/46/ES.
The enforcement of these requirements should be made more effective by way of enhanced powers granted to the relevant national authorities.
Uveljavljanje teh zahtev bi moralo postati učinkovitejše, in sicer s podelitvijo večjih pooblastili ustreznim nacionalnim organom.
Safeguards provided for subscribers against intrusion into their privacy by unsolicited communications for direct marketing purposes by means of electronic mail should also be applicable to SMS, MMS and other kinds of similar applications.
Zaščita naročnikov pred vdorom v njihovo zasebnost z neželenimi sporočili za namene neposrednega trženja prek elektronske pošte bi morala veljati tudi za kratka in večpredstavnostna sporočila (SMS, MMS) ter druge podobne aplikacije.
Electronic communications service providers make substantial investments in order to combat unsolicited commercial communications (spam).
Ponudniki elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev vlagajo precejšnja sredstva za zatiranje neželenih reklamnih sporočil („neželena elektronska pošta“).
They are also in a better position than end-users in that they possess the knowledge and resources necessary to detect and identify spammers.
Ponudniki takšnih storitev so tudi v boljšem položaju kot končni uporabniki, saj imajo znanje in vire, potrebne za odkrivanje in identifikacijo pošiljateljev neželene elektronske pošte.
E-mail service providers and other service providers should therefore be able to initiate legal action against spammers, and thus defend the interests of their customers, as part of their own legitimate business interests.
Ponudniki storitev elektronske pošte in ponudniki drugih storitev bi zato morali imeti možnost, da v primeru takšnih kršitev pravno ukrepajo zoper pošiljatelje neželene elektronske pošte in tako branijo interese svojih strank, ki so hkrati tudi njihovi zakoniti poslovni interesi.
The need to ensure an adequate level of protection of privacy and personal data transmitted and processed in connection with the use of electronic communications networks in the Community calls for effective implementation and enforcement powers in order to provide adequate incentives for compliance.
Zaradi potrebe po zagotovitvi ustrezne ravni varstva zasebnosti in osebnih podatkov, ki se pošiljajo ali obdelujejo v povezavi z uporabo elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij v Skupnosti, so potrebna učinkovita izvedbena in izvršilna pooblastila, da se zagotovijo ustrezne spodbude za skladnost.
Competent national authorities and, where appropriate, other relevant national bodies should have sufficient powers and resources to investigate cases of non-compliance effectively, including powers to obtain any relevant information they might need, to decide on complaints and to impose sanctions in cases of non-compliance.
Pristojni nacionalni organi in po potrebi drugi ustrezni nacionalni organi bi morali imeti zadostna pooblastila in vire za učinkovito preiskavo primerov neskladnosti, vključno z možnostjo, da pridobijo ustrezne informacije, ki jih morda potrebujejo za odločanje o pritožbah in za naložitev sankcij v primerih neskladnosti.
The implementation and enforcement of the provisions of this Directive often require cooperation between the national regulatory authorities of two or more Member States, for example in combating cross-border spam and spyware.
Za izvajanje in izvrševanje določb te direktive je pogosto potrebno sodelovanje med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi dveh ali več držav članic, denimo pri zatiranju čezmejne neželene pošte in vohunske programske opreme.
In order to ensure smooth and rapid cooperation in such cases, procedures relating for example to the quantity and format of information exchanged between authorities, or deadlines to be complied with, should be defined by the relevant national authorities, subject to examination by the Commission.
Da bi v takšnih primerih zagotovili nemoteno in hitro sodelovanje, bi morali ustrezni nacionalni organi določiti na primer postopke v zvezi z obsegom in obliko informacij, ki se izmenjajo med organi, ali roke, ki jih je treba spoštovati, Komisija pa bi jih morala preučiti.
Such procedures will also allow the resulting obligations of market actors to be harmonised, contributing to the creation of a level playing field in the Community.
Takšni postopki bodo prav tako omogočili uskladitev iz tega izhajajočih obveznosti udeležencev na trgu, kar bo prispevalo k nastanku enakih konkurenčnih pogojev v Skupnosti.
Cross-border cooperation and enforcement should be reinforced in line with existing Community cross-border enforcement mechanisms, such as that laid down in Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 (the Regulation on consumer protection cooperation) [16], by way of an amendment to that Regulation.
Čezmejno sodelovanje in izvrševanje zakonodaje v skladu z obstoječim mehanizmom Skupnosti, določenim z Uredbo (ES) št. 2006/2004 (Uredba o sodelovanju na področju varstva potrošnikov) [16], bi bilo treba s spremembo navedene uredbe okrepiti.
The measures necessary for the implementation of Directives 2002/22/EC (Universal Service Directive) and 2002/58/EC (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission [17].
Ukrepe, potrebne za izvajanje direktiv 2002/22/ES (Direktiva o univerzalnih storitvah) in 2002/58/ES (Direktiva o zasebnosti in elektronskih komunikacijah), bi bilo treba sprejeti v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil [17].
In particular, the Commission should be empowered to adopt implementing measures on effective access to ‘112’ services, as well as to adapt the Annexes to technical progress or changes in market demand.
Zlasti bi bilo treba Komisiji podeliti pooblastila za sprejetje izvedbenih ukrepov za učinkovit dostop do storitev „112“ ter za prilagoditev prilog tehničnemu napredku ali spremembam tržnega povpraševanja.
It should also be empowered to adopt implementing measures concerning information and notification requirements and security of processing.
Podeliti bi ji bilo treba tudi pooblastila za sprejetje izvedbenih ukrepov o zahtevah glede informacij in priglasitve in varnosti obdelave.
Since those measures are of general scope and are designed to amend non-essential elements of Directives 2002/22/EC (Universal Service Directive) and 2002/58/EC (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) by supplementing them with new non-essential elements, they must be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC.
Ker so ti ukrepi splošnega obsega in so namenjeni spreminjanju nebistvenih določb direktiv 2002/22/ES (Direktiva o univerzalnih storitvah) in 2002/58/ES (Direktiva o zasebnosti in elektronskih komunikacijah) z njunim dopolnjevanjem z novimi nebistvenimi določbami, jih je treba sprejeti v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 5a Sklepa 1999/468/ES.
Given that the conduct of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny within the normal time limits could, in certain exceptional situations, impede the timely adoption of implementing measures, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should act speedily in order to ensure the timely adoption of those measures.
Ker bi uporaba regulativnega postopka s pregledom v okviru običajnih časovnih rokov lahko v nekaterih izjemnih okoliščinah ovirala pravočasno sprejetje izvedbenih ukrepov, bi morali Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija hitro ukrepati, da bi zagotovili njihovo pravočasno sprejetje.