natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Although narrower market definitions might be envisaged in certain cases, the precise definition of the relevant market can be left open for the purposes of this Decision as far as a number of the services listed in the request submitted by Post are concerned to the extent that the result of the analysis remains the same whether it is based on a narrow or a broader definition.
Čeprav je v določenih primerih mogoče predvideti ožje opredelitve trgov, lahko natančna opredelitev zadevnega trga ostane odprta za namene tega sklepa, če se številne storitve, navedene v zahtevi, ki jo je predložila Pošta, obravnavajo v takšnem obsegu, da rezultat analize ostane enak ne glede na to, ali temelji na ozki ali širši opredelitvi.
Standard consumer parcel services (C2C and C2B), domestic and international
Potrošniške storitve standardne paketne pošte (od potrošnika do potrošnika in od potrošnika do podjetij) v domovini in tujini
Standard consumer parcel services must be considered apart, as they satisfy different needs of demand (universal postal service) in relation to commercial parcels, where the technological process of providing this service usually differs significantly.
Potrošniške storitve standardne paketne pošte je treba obravnavati posebej, saj zadovoljujejo drugačne potrebe povpraševanja (univerzalna poštna storitev) glede na poslovne pakete, kjer se tehnološki proces opravljanja te storitve običajno bistveno razlikuje.
Therefore Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC does not apply to contracts intended to enable the pursuit of those activities in Austria.
Zato se člen 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES ne uporablja za naročila, katerih namen je omogočiti izvajanje navedenih dejavnosti v Avstriji.
standard parcel services, domestic and international
Storitve standardne paketne pošte od podjetij do potrošnika v domovini in tujini
In respect of B2B standard parcel services, Post’s market share reached 9 % by volume in 2008, compared to an aggregate market share for the two biggest competitors that year amounting to 52-62 %.
Pri medpodjetniških storitvah standardne paketne pošte je tržni delež Pošte v letu 2008 dosegel 9 % po količini, skupni tržni delež dveh največjih konkurentov v istem letu pa je znašal 52–62 %.
These factors should therefore be taken as an indication of direct exposure to competition for B2B standard parcel services.
Te dejavnike je zato treba obravnavati kot znak neposredne izpostavljenosti medpodjetniških storitev standardne paketne pošte konkurenci.
In this context, the international market should not be seen in isolation, but in the framework of the overall market for B2C standard parcel services, given that the international market for B2C parcel services forms only 3 % by volume of the total market for B2C parcel services.
Glede na to se mednarodni trg ne sme obravnavati posebej, ampak v okviru celotnega trga za storitve standardne paketne pošte od podjetij do potrošnika, saj mednarodni trg za storitve paketne pošte od podjetij do potrošnika predstavlja po količini samo 3 % celotnega trga za storitve paketne pošte od podjetij do potrošnika.
Express parcel services, domestic
Storitve hitre paketne pošte v domovini
Combined freight services
Kombinirane storitve prevoza blaga
Here also, the market share obtained by Post is until now quite negligible (it is estimated as being ‘considerably below 0,1 %’).
Tudi na tem področju je tržni delež, ki ga je Pošta do zdaj pridobila, zanemarljiv (po ocenah je „znatno pod 0,1 %“).
In view of the factors examined in recitals 2 to 13, the condition of direct exposure to competition laid down in Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC should be considered to be met in Austria in respect of the following services:
Glede na dejavnike, preučene v uvodnih izjavah 2 do 13, je treba pogoj neposredne izpostavljenosti konkurenci, določen v členu 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES, šteti za izpolnjenega v Avstriji za naslednje storitve:
standard B2B parcel services, both domestic and international;
medpodjetniške storitve standardne paketne pošte v domovini in tujini;
standard B2C parcel services, both domestic and international;
storitve standardne paketne pošte od podjetij do potrošnika v domovini in tujini;
combined freight services; and
kombinirane storitve prevoza blaga in
contract logistics.
pogodbena logistika.
Since the condition of unrestricted access to the market is deemed to be met, Directive 2004/17/EC should not apply when contracting entities award contracts intended to enable the services listed in points (a) to (e) of recital 14 to be carried out in Austria, nor when design contests are organised for the pursuit of such an activity in Austria.
Ker se zdi, da je pogoj neomejenega dostopa do trga izpolnjen, se Direktiva 2004/17/ES ne bi smela uporabljati, če naročniki oddajajo naročila, katerih namen je omogočiti izvedbo storitev, navedenih v točkah (a) do (e) uvodne izjave 14, v Avstriji ali če so organizirani natečaji za opravljanje te dejavnosti v Avstriji.
This Decision is based on the legal and factual situation as of May to November 2009 as it appears from the information submitted by Post and the Republic of Austria.
Ta sklep temelji na pravnih in dejanskih razmerah od maja do novembra 2009, kot je razvidno iz informacij, ki sta jih predložili Pošta in Republika Avstrija.
Directive 2004/17/EC shall not apply to contracts awarded by contracting entities and intended to enable the following services to be carried out in Austria:
Direktiva 2004/17/ES se ne uporablja za javna naročila, ki jih oddajo naročniki in so namenjena omogočanju izvajanja naslednjih storitev v Avstriji:
standard business to business parcel services, both domestic and international;
medpodjetniške storitve standardne paketne pošte v domovini in tujini;
standard business to consumer parcel services, both domestic and international;
storitve standardne paketne pošte od podjetij do potrošnika v domovini in tujini;
Done at Brussels, 3 March 2010.
V Bruslju, 3. marca 2010
Austria has also recently adopted legislation to implement Directive 2008/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 amending Directive 97/67/EC with regard to the full accomplishment of the internal market of Community postal services (OJ L 52, 27.2.2008, p. 3).
Avstrija je pred kratkim sprejela tudi zakonodajo za izvajanje Direktive 2008/6/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. februarja 2008 o spremembi Direktive 97/67/ES glede popolnega oblikovanja notranjega trga poštnih storitev v Skupnosti (UL L 52, 27.2.2008, str. 3).
This will, as of 1 January 2011, abolish the abovementioned reservations.
S tem bodo s 1.1.2011 odpravljene zgoraj omenjene rezervacije.
A distinction could be envisaged between C2C and C2B parcel services; however, because of this close substitutability on the supply-side, it is appropriate to treat these services as one C2X service.
Med storitvami paketne pošte od potrošnika do potrošnika in storitvami paketne pošte od potrošnika do podjetij bi se lahko razlikovalo, vendar je zaradi te bližnje nadomestljivosti na strani ponudbe primerno, da se te storitve obravnavajo kot ena storitev C2X.
This is also consistent with analysis adopted for Finland and Sweden in, respectively, Commission Decisions 2007/564/EC and 2009/46/EC.
To je tudi skladno z analizo, ki je bila privzeta za Finsko v Odločbi 2007/564/ES, za Švedsko pa v Odločbi 2009/46/ES.
Defined by Post as comprising ‘the carriage of parcels where the parcels are collected from customers in Austria for onward dispatch to abroad.’
V skladu z opredelitvijo Pošte je to „prenos paketne pošte, pri katerem se paketi prevzamejo od strank v Avstriji in pošljejo naprej v tujino“.
Defined by Post as comprising ‘the carriage of parcels where the parcel is collected from the customer abroad or where the parcel is collected by foreign parcel service providers for delivery within Austria — e.g. on the basis of bilateral agreements and/or under the Universal Postal Union Convention’.
V skladu z opredelitvijo Pošte je to „prenos paketne pošte, pri katerem se paket prevzame od stranke v tujini ali pri katerem paket prevzamejo tuji izvajalci storitev paketne pošte za dostavo znotraj Avstrije – na primer na podlagi dvostranskih sporazumov in/ali konvencije Svetovne poštne zveze“.
When measured by volume, Post’s market share in 2006 was of the order of approx. 23 %.
Tržni delež Pošte, izmerjen po količini, je leta 2006 znašal približno 23 %.
The figures for 2007 and 2008 are also percentages by value.
Podatka za leti 2007 in 2008 sta tudi deleža po vrednosti.
This is, mutatis mutandis, the reasoning applied in previous Decisions, see e.g. recital 17 of Commission Decision 2009/46/EC of 19 December 2008 exempting certain services in the postal sector in Sweden from the application of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (OJ L 19, 23.1.2009, p. 50).
To je smiselno razlaga, ki se je uporabila že v prejšnjih odločitvah, glej na primer uvodno izjavo 17 Odločbe Komisije 2009/46/ES z dne 19. decembra 2008 o izvzetju nekaterih storitev v poštnem sektorju na Švedskem iz uporabe Direktive 2004/17/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil naročnikov v vodnem, energetskem in transportnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev (UL L 19, 23.1.2009, str. 50).
Respectively, Linz AG and Wiener Hafen GmbH & Co KG/Wien Holding GmbH.
Linz AG in Wiener Hafen GmbH & Co KG/Wien Holding GmbH.
In accordance with Article 30(5) first subparagraph, the Commission informed the Austrian authorities thereof by letter of 15 September 2009, to which the Austrian authorities answered by e-mail of 9 October 2009.
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 30(5) je Komisija o tem obvestila avstrijske organe s pismom z dne 15. septembra 2009, na katerega so avstrijski organi odgovorili po elektronski pošti z dne 9. oktobra 2009.
The Commission also requested additional information of Post by e-mail of 22 October 2009, which, following a prolongation of the deadline was transmitted by Post by e-mail of 13 November 2009.
Komisija je poleg tega po elektronski pošti z dne 22. oktobra 2009 od Pošte zahtevala dodatne informacije, ki jih je Pošta po podaljšanju roka poslala po elektronski pošti z dne 13. novembra 2009.
In respect of these services, Post’s market position is quite strong with an estimated market share that has remained stable over the period 2006-2008 at the order of 91-93 % by volume [5].
Pri teh storitvah je položaj Pošte na trgu precej močan, pri čemer je bil ocenjeni tržni delež v obdobju 2006–2008 ustaljen in po količini znašal 91–93 % [5].
While this may change in the coming years following the increase in the services provided by one of Post’s competitors which is announced for 2010, it should be concluded that the category of services examined here is not directly exposed to competition in Austria.
Čeprav se lahko to v prihodnjih letih s povečanjem obsega storitev, ki ga je za leto 2010 napovedal konkurent Pošte, spremeni, je treba zaključiti, da kategorija preučenih storitev ni neposredno izpostavljena konkurenci v Avstriji.
On the international (outbound [6]) market for B2C parcels, Post’s market share fell from 83 % by volume in 2006 to 79 % by volume in 2008.
Na mednarodnem (odhodnem [6]) trgu paketne pošte od podjetij do potrošnika se je tržni delež Pošte zmanjšal s 83 % po količini v letu 2006 na 79 % po količini v letu 2008.
It should be kept in mind that the aim of the present Decision is to establish whether the services concerned by the request are exposed to such a level of competition (on markets to which access is free) that this will ensure that, also in the absence of the discipline brought about by the detailed procurement rules set out in Directive 2004/17/EC, procurement for the pursuit of the activities concerned here will be carried out in a transparent, non-discriminatory manner based on criteria allowing purchasers to identify the solution which overall is the economically most advantageous one.
Upoštevati je treba, da je namen tega sklepa ugotoviti, ali so storitve, na katere se nanaša zahteva, izpostavljene takšni stopnji konkurence (na trgih s prostim dostopom), ki zagotavlja, da se bo oddaja javnih naročil za izvajanje zadevnih storitev izvajala na pregleden in nediskriminatoren način na podlagi meril, ki naročnikom omogočajo, da ugotovijo, katera rešitev je ekonomsko najugodnejša, tudi če ni discipline, ki se dosega s podrobnimi pravili javnega naročanja, določenimi v Direktivi 2004/17/ES.
On the latter market, Post’s market share fell from 79 % by volume in 2006 to 57 % by volume in 2008.
Na slednjem trgu se je tržni delež Pošte zmanjšal z 79 % po količini v letu 2006 na 57 % po količini v letu 2008.
However, at 23-33 % by volume in 2008, the aggregate market share of the two biggest competitors amounts to about half of that of Post and at that level it can be considered that they would be able to exert a significant competitive pressure on Post, considering also that the biggest of the two competitors intends to strengthen his network.
S 23–33 % po količini v letu 2008 znaša skupni tržni delež dveh največjih konkurentov približno polovico tržnega deleža Pošte; zaradi tega deleža se lahko šteje, da bi lahko izvajala velik konkurenčni pritisk na Pošto, zlasti ker večji med njima namerava okrepiti svojo mrežo.
Post’s market share of the market for domestic express parcel services (including inbound [7] express parcel services) has been steadily falling over the period from 2006 to 2008, from approx. 47 % by value [8] in 2006, about 46 % in 2007 to around 43 % in 2008 [9].
Tržni delež Pošte na trgu za storitve hitre paketne pošte v domovini (vključno s storitvami prihajajoče [7] hitre paketne pošte) se je v obdobju od leta 2006 do leta 2008 stalno zmanjševal s približno 47 % po vrednosti [8] v letu 2006 prek približno 46 % v letu 2007 na približno 43 % v letu 2008 [9].
The aggregate market share of the two biggest competitors amounted to slightly over 28 % by value in 2008, i.e. almost two thirds of Post’s market share, at which level they would be able to bring a significant competitive pressure to bear on Post [10].
Skupni tržni delež dveh največjih konkurentov je v letu 2008 znašal nekoliko več kot 28 % po vrednosti, tj. skoraj dve tretjini tržnega deleža Pošte, tako da bi lahko konkurenta izvajala velik konkurenčni pritisk na Pošto [10].
Post has started offering combined freight services as defined under recital 2(e) above, only towards the end of 2007.
Pošta je začela ponujati kombinirane storitve prevoza blaga, kot so opredeljene v uvodni izjavi 2(e) zgoraj, šele proti koncu leta 2007.
Faced with competition from big logistics companies, such as Dachser Austria GmbH, Kühne & Nagel Ges.m.b.H., Logwin-Gruppe, Schachinger Paketdienst Gesellschaft m.b.H., Schenker & Co AG and Gebrüder Weiss GmbH, Post, Post has until now not succeeded in obtaining more than a negligible market share that it estimates as being ‘considerably below 1 %’.
Zaradi konkurence velikih logističnih podjetij, kot so DACHSER Austria GmbH, Kühne & Nagel Ges.m.b.H., LOGWIN-Gruppe, Schachinger Paketdienst Gesellschaft m.b.H., Schenker & Co AG in Gebrüder Weiss GmbH, je lahko Pošta do zdaj pridobila samo zanemarljiv tržni delež, ki je po njenih ocenah „znatno pod 1 %“.
Post started offering contract logistics services as defined under recital 2(f) above, only in 2008.
Pošta je začela ponujati pogodbene logistične storitve, kot so opredeljene v uvodni izjavi 2(f) zgoraj, šele leta 2008.
On this market it is faced with competition not only from big logistics companies, such as in particular Gebrüder Weiss GmbH, Schachinger Paketdienst Gesellschaft m.b.H., Lagermax Internationale Spedition Ges.m.b.H./Lagermax Paketdienst GmbH & Co KG, CEVA Logistics Austria GmbH, Logwin-Gruppe, but also from the Austrian Federal Railways [11] and the harbours of Linz and Vienna [12].
Na tem trgu se sooča s konkurenco velikih logističnih podjetij, kot so zlasti Gebrüder Weiss GmbH, Schachinger Paketdienst Gesellschaft m.b.H., Lagermax Internationale Spedition Ges.m.b.H./Lagermax Paketdienst GmbH & Co KG, CEVA Logistics Austria GmbH in LOGWIN-Gruppe, ter Avstrijskih zveznih železnic [11] in pristanišč v Linzu in na Dunaju [12].
of 5 March 2010
z dne 5. marca 2010
on a financial contribution from the Union towards emergency measures to combat swine vesicular disease in Italy in 2009
o finančnem prispevku Unije za nujne ukrepe za boj proti vezikularni bolezni prašičev v Italiji leta 2009
(notified under document C(2010) 1192)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 1192)
Having regard to Council Decision 2009/470/EC of 25 May 2009 on expenditure in the veterinary field [1], and in particular Article 3(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 2009/470/ES z dne 25. maja 2009 o odhodkih na področju veterine [1] in zlasti člena 3(4) Odločbe,
Decision 2009/470/EC lays down the procedures governing the Union’s financial contribution towards specific veterinary measures, including emergency measures.
Odločba 2009/470/ES določa postopke, ki urejajo finančni prispevek Unije za posebne veterinarske ukrepe, vključno z nujnimi ukrepi.
Swine vesicular disease is an infectious viral disease of pigs which is clinically indistinguishable from foot-and-mouth disease and causing therefore disturbance to trade within the Union and export to third countries.
Vezikularna bolezen prašičev je nalezljiva virusna bolezen prašičev, ki se klinično ne loči od slinavke in parkljevke in zato povzroča motnje v trgovini znotraj Unije in izvozu v tretje države.
Outbreaks of swine vesicular disease occurred in Italy in 2009.
Izbruhi vezikularne bolezni prašičev so se v Italiji pojavili leta 2009.
The recrudescence of that disease represents a serious risk to the Union’s livestock population.
Ponoven izbruh navedene bolezni pomeni resno nevarnost za živino v Uniji.
Italy took measures, in accordance with Article 3(2) of Council Decision 90/424/EEC [2], to combat those outbreaks.
Italija je sprejela ukrepe za boj proti navedenim izbruhom v skladu s členom 3(2) Odločbe Sveta 90/424/EGS [2].
In the event of an outbreak of swine vesicular disease, there is a risk that the disease agent might spread to other pig holdings within that Member State, but also to other Member States and to third countries through trade in live pigs or their products.
Ob izbruhu vezikularne bolezni prašičev obstaja tveganje, da se povzročitelj bolezni razširi na druga gospodarstva s prašiči v isti državi članici, na druge države članice ali tretje države prek trgovine z živimi prašiči ali proizvodi iz njih.
Commission Decision 2005/779/EC of 8 November 2005 concerning animal health protection measures against swine vesicular disease in Italy [3] lays down animal health rules as regards swine vesicular disease for regions of Italy that are recognized as free from swine vesicular disease and those not recognized as free from that disease.
Odločba Komisije 2005/779/ES z dne 8. novembra 2005 o ukrepih za zdravstveno varstvo živali pred vezikularno boleznijo prašičev v Italiji [3] določa pravila za zdravstveno varstvo živali glede vezikularne bolezni prašičev za tiste italijanske regije, ki so priznane kot proste vezikularne bolezni prašičev, in tiste, ki niso.
Article 3(6), first indent of Decision 2009/470/EC lays down rules on the percentage of certain costs incurred by the Member State that may be covered by the Union’s financial contribution.
V prvi alinei člena 3(6) Odločbe 2009/470/EGS so določena pravila o deležih nekaterih stroškov, nastalih v državah članicah, ki jih lahko zajema finančni prispevek Unije.
The payment of a Union financial contribution towards emergency measures to eradicate swine vesicular disease is subject to the rules laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 349/2005 of 28 February 2005 laying down rules on the Community financing of emergency measures and of the campaign to combat certain animal diseases under Council Decision 90/424/EEC [4].
Za plačilo finančnega prispevka Unije za nujne ukrepe za izkoreninjenje vezikularne bolezni prašičev veljajo pravila iz Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 349/2005 z dne 28. februarja 2005 o določitvi pravil v zvezi s financiranjem Skupnosti nujnih ukrepov in ukrepov za boj proti nekaterim živalskim boleznim iz Odločbe Sveta 90/424/EGS [4].
Italy has fully complied with its technical and administrative obligations as set out in Article 3(4) of Decision 2009/470/EC and Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 349/2005.
Italija je v celoti izpolnila tehnične in upravne obveznosti iz člena 3(4) Odločbe 2009/470/ES in člena 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 349/2005.
On 21 May 2009 and 10 June 2009, Italy submitted an estimate of the costs incurred in taking measures to eradicate swine vesicular disease.
Italija je 21. maja 2009 in 10. junija 2009 predstavila oceno nastalih stroškov za izkoreninjenje vezikularne bolezni prašičev.
Financial contribution from the Union to Italy
Finančni prispevek Unije za Italijo
A financial contribution from the Union may be granted to Italy towards certain costs incurred by that Member State in taking measures pursuant to Article 3(2) of Decision 2009/470/EC to combat swine vesicular disease in 2009.
Italiji se lahko odobri finančni prispevek Unije za kritje nekaterih stroškov, ki jih je navedena država članica imela leta 2009 zaradi uvedbe ukrepov za boj proti vezikularni bolezni prašičev iz člena 3(2) Odločbe 2009/470/ES.
Done at Brussels, 5 March 2010.
V Bruslju, 5. marca 2010
Council Decision 2010/145/CFSP
Sklep Sveta 2010/145/SZVP
of 8 March 2010
z dne 8. marca 2010
renewing measures in support of the effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
o obnovitvi ukrepov v podporo učinkovitemu izvajanju pooblastil Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča za nekdanjo Jugoslavijo (MKSNJ)
On 16 April 2003, the Council adopted Common Position 2003/280/CFSP in support of the effective implementation of the mandate of the ICTY [1].
Svet je 16. aprila 2003 sprejel Skupno stališče 2003/280/SZVP v podporo učinkovitemu izvajanju pooblastil MKSNJ [1].
On 30 March 2004, the Council adopted Common Position 2004/293/CFSP renewing measures in support of the effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) [2].
Svet je 30. marca 2004 sprejel Skupno stališče 2004/293/SZVP o obnovitvi ukrepov v podporo učinkovitemu izvajanju pooblastil Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča za nekdanjo Jugoslavijo (MKSNJ) [2].
Common Position 2004/293/CFSP was extended for the last time by Common Position 2009/164/CFSP of 26 February 2009 renewing measures in support of the effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) [3] until 16 March 2010.
Skupno stališče 2004/293/SZVP je bilo zadnjikrat podaljšano s Skupnim stališčem 2009/164/SZVP z dne 26. februarja 2009 o obnovitvi ukrepov v podporo učinkovitemu izvajanju mandata Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča za nekdanjo Jugoslavijo (MKSNJ) [3] do 16. marca 2010.
Persons indicted by the ICTY are still at large, and there is evidence that they are being assisted in their efforts to continue to evade justice.
Osebe, ki jih je obtožilo MKSNJ, so še vedno na prostosti in obstajajo dokazi, da imajo podporo pri prizadevanjih, da se lahko še naprej izogibajo roki pravice.
The measures provided for in Common Position 2004/293/CFSP should be renewed for a further 12 months,
Ukrepe iz Skupnega stališča 2004/293/SZVP bi bilo treba podaljšati za nadaljnjih 12 mesecev –