natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EUR 1700000 for Italy;
1700000 EUR za Italijo;
EUR 100000 for Cyprus;
100000 EUR za Ciper;
EUR 90000 for Latvia;’;
90000 EUR za Latvijo;“;
in point (q), ‘EUR 1700000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 2350000’;
v točki (q) se „1700000 EUR“ nadomesti z „2350000 EUR“;
points (s) to (u) are replaced by the following:
točke (s) do (u) se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
EUR 4500000 for Poland;
4500000 EUR za Poljsko;
EUR 650000 for Portugal;
650000 EUR za Portugalsko;
EUR 50000 for Romania;’;
50000 EUR za Romunijo;“;
in Article 6(2), point (c) is replaced by the following:
v členu 6(2) se točka (c) nadomesti z naslednjim:
EUR 670000 for France;’;
670000 EUR za Francijo;“;
in Article 8, paragraph (2) is amended as follows:
v členu 8 se odstavek 2 spremeni:
in point (e), ‘EUR 500000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 250000’;
v točki (e) se „500000 EUR“ nadomesti z „250000 EUR“;
in point (k), ‘EUR 550000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 1400000’;
v točki (k) se „550000 EUR“ nadomesti z „1400000 EUR“;
in point (s), ‘EUR 50000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 80000’;
v točki (s) se „50000 EUR“ nadomesti z „80000 EUR“;
in point (v), ‘EUR 400000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 220000’;
v točki (v) se „400000 EUR“ nadomesti z „220000 EUR“;
in Article 9, paragraph (2) is amended as follows:
v členu 9 se odstavek 2 spremeni:
points (a) to (c) are replaced by the following:
točke (a) do (c) se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
EUR 1400000 for Belgium;
1400000 EUR za Belgijo;
EUR 350000 for Bulgaria;
350000 EUR za Bolgarijo;
EUR 1050000 for the Czech Republic;’;
1050000 EUR za Češko;“;
points (g) to (k) are replaced by the following:
točke (g) do (k) se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
EUR 3300000 for Ireland;
3300000 EUR za Irsko;
EUR 1200000 for Greece;
1200000 EUR za Grčijo;
EUR 5400000 for Spain;
5400000 EUR za Španijo;
EUR 14100000 for France;
14100000 EUR za Francijo;
EUR 5350000 for Italy;’;
5350000 EUR za Italijo;“;
in point (m), ‘EUR 230000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 250000’;
v točki (m) se „230000 EUR“ nadomesti z „250000 EUR“;
in point (r), ‘EUR 2900000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 2600000’;
v točki (r) se „2900000 EUR“ nadomesti z „2600000 EUR“;
points (t) to (v) are replaced by the following:
točke (t) do (v) se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
EUR 790000 for Poland;
790000 EUR za Poljsko;
EUR 1530000 for Portugal;
1530000 EUR za Portugalsko;
EUR 580000 for Romania;’;
580000 EUR za Romunijo;“;
points (x) and (y) are replaced by the following:
točki (x) in (y) se nadomestita z naslednjim:
EUR 500000 for Finland;’;
500000 EUR za Finsko;“;
in point (za) ‘EUR 5900000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 4600000’;
v točki (za) se „5900000 EUR“ nadomesti s „4600000 EUR“;
in Article 10, paragraph (2), is amended as follows:
v členu 10 se odstavek 2 spremeni:
EUR 1100000 for Bulgaria;
1100000 EUR za Bolgarijo;
EUR 500000 for Lithuania;
500000 EUR za Litvo;
EUR 880000 for Hungary;’;
880000 EUR za Madžarsko;“;
in point (f) ‘EUR 500000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 760000’;
v točki (f) se „500000 EUR“ nadomesti s „760000 EUR“;
in Article 11(2) point (d) is replaced by the following:
v členu 11(2) se točka (d) nadomesti z naslednjim:
EUR 1100000 for Poland.’;
1100000 EUR za Poljsko.“;
in Article 12(2) point (c) is replaced by the following:
v členu 12(2) se točka (c) nadomesti z naslednjim:
EUR 1650000 for Poland.’;
1650000 EUR za Poljsko.“;
in Article 13(2) points (c) to (e) are replaced by the following:
v členu 13(2) se točke (c) do (e) nadomestijo z naslednjim:
EUR 870000 for Estonia;
870000 EUR za Estonijo;
EUR 850000 for Latvia;
850000 EUR za Latvijo;
EUR 550000 for Slovenia;’;
550000 EUR za Slovenijo;“;
in Article 14(2), ‘EUR 175000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 310000’;
v členu 14(2) se „175000 EUR“ nadomesti s „310000 EUR“;
in Article 15(2), point (c), is replaced by the following:
v členu 15(2) se točka (c) nadomesti z naslednjim:
EUR 460000 for Portugal.’;
460000 EUR za Portugalsko.“;
in Article 15a(4), ‘EUR 5400000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 3000000’.
v členu 15a(4) se „5400000 EUR“ nadomesti s „3000000 EUR“.
OJ L 194, 25.7.2009, p. 56.
UL L 194, 25.7.2009, str. 56.
of 30 November 2009
z dne 30. novembra 2009
concerning the non-inclusion of diphenylamine in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance
o nevključitvi difenilamina v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o preklicu registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo navedeno snov
That list includes diphenylamine.
Navedeni seznam vključuje difenilamin.
For diphenylamine the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed in accordance with the provisions laid down in Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 and (EC) No 1490/2002 for a range of uses proposed by the notifier.
Vplivi difenilamina na zdravje ljudi in okolje so bili ocenjeni v skladu z določbami uredb (ES) št. 451/2000 in (ES) št. 1490/2002 za vrste uporab, ki jih je predlagal prijavitelj.
For diphenylamine the rapporteur Member State was Ireland and all relevant information was submitted on 20 June 2007.
Država članica poročevalka za difenilamin je bila Irska, vse ustrezne informacije pa so bile predložene 20. junija 2007.
The assessment report has been peer reviewed by the Member States and the EFSA within its Working Group evaluation and presented to the Commission on 30 September 2008 in the format of the EFSA conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance diphenylamine [4].
Poročilo o oceni so v okviru delovne skupine za ocenjevanje pregledali strokovnjaki držav članic in EFSA ter ga 30. septembra 2008 predložili Komisiji v obliki sklepa EFSA o strokovnem pregledu ocene nevarnosti pesticidov z aktivno snovjo difenilamin [4].
This report has been reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 26 February 2009 in the format of the Commission review report for diphenylamine.
To poročilo so države članice in Komisija pregledale v okviru Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter dokončno različico pripravile 26. februarja 2009 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu glede difenilamina.
In particular, it was not possible to perform a reliable consumer exposure assessment, as data are missing on the presence and toxicity of unidentified metabolites of the substance, as well as on the possible formation of nitrosamines during storage of the active substance and during processing of treated apples.
Zlasti ni bilo mogoče pripraviti zanesljive ocene izpostavljenosti za potrošnike, saj manjkajo podatki o prisotnosti in toksičnosti neopredeljenih metabolitov v snovi ter o morebitnem nastajanju nitrozaminov med skladiščenjem te aktivne snovi in predelavo obdelanih jabolk.
Moreover, no data was available on the potential breakdown or reaction product of diphenylamine residues in processed commodities.
Poleg tega ni razpoložljivih podatkov o morebitnem razgradnem ali reakcijskem produktu ostankov difenilamina pri predelanih proizvodih.
Consequently, it was not possible to conclude on the basis of the information available that diphenylamine met the criteria for inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Zato na podlagi predloženih informacij ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, da difenilamin izpolnjuje pogoje za vključitev v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
However, despite the arguments put forward by the notifier, the concerns identified could not be eliminated, and assessments made on the basis of the information submitted and evaluated during the EFSA expert meetings have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing diphenylamine satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Toda kljub argumentom, ki jih je prijavitelj predložil, se navedenih pomislekov ni dalo odpraviti, po ocenah na podlagi predloženih informacij, preučenih na srečanjih strokovnjakov EFSA, pa ne kaže pričakovati, da bi lahko fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo difenilamin, pod predvidenimi pogoji uporabe na splošno izpolnjevala zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
Diphenylamine should therefore not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Difenilamin se zato ne sme vključiti v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Measures should be taken to ensure that authorisations granted for plant protection products containing diphenylamine are withdrawn within a fixed period of time and are not renewed and that no new authorisations for such products are granted.
Sprejeti je treba ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo difenilamin, prekličejo v predpisanem roku in se ne podaljšajo ali izdajo nove registracije takih sredstev.
Any period of grace granted by a Member State for the disposal, storage, placing on the market and use of existing stocks of plant protection products containing diphenylamine should be limited to 12 months in order to allow existing stocks to be used in one further growing season, which ensures that plant protection products containing diphenylamine remain available to farmers for 18 months from the adoption of this Decision.
Če države članice odobrijo podaljšanje roka za odstranjevanje, skladiščenje, dajanje v promet in uporabo obstoječih zalog fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo difenilamin, ga je treba omejiti na obdobje dvanajstih mesecev, da se omogoči uporaba obstoječih zalog v naslednji rastni sezoni, s čimer se zagotovi, da fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo difenilamin, ostanejo kmetom na razpolago 18 mesecev po sprejetju te odločbe.
This Decision does not prejudice the submission of an application for diphenylamine according to the provisions of Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, the detailed implementation rules of which have been laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I [5], in view of a possible inclusion in its Annex I.
Ta odločba ne vpliva na predložitev zahtevka za difenilamin v skladu z določbami člena 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS, katere podrobna pravila za izvajanje so določena v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 33/2008 z dne 17. januarja 2008 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS glede rednega in pospešenega postopka za oceno aktivnih snovi, ki so bile del programa dela iz člena 8(2) navedene direktive, vendar niso bile vključene v Prilogo I [5], zaradi morebitne vključitve v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi.
The Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health did not deliver an opinion on the measures provided for in this Decision within the time limit laid down by its Chairman and the Commission therefore submitted to the Council a proposal relating to these measures.
Stalni odbor za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ni izdal mnenja o ukrepih iz te odločbe v roku, ki ga je določil njegov predsednik, zato je Komisija Svetu predložila predlog v zvezi s temi ukrepi.
Since, on the expiry of the period laid down in the second subparagraph of Article 19(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, the Council had neither adopted the proposed measures nor indicated its opposition to them, they should be adopted by the Commission,
Ker po poteku obdobja iz drugega pododstavka člena 19(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS Svet ni niti sprejel predlaganih ukrepov niti jim ni nasprotoval, mora ukrepe sprejeti Komisija –
Diphenylamine shall not be included as an active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Difenilamin se ne vključi kot aktivna snov v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
authorisations for plant protection products containing diphenylamine are withdrawn by 30 May 2010;
se registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo difenilamin, prekličejo do 30. maja 2010;
no authorisations for plant protection products containing diphenylamine are granted or renewed from the date of publication of this Decision.
se od datuma objave te odločbe nobene registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo difenilamin, ne odobrijo ali podaljšajo.
Any period of grace granted by Member States in accordance with the provisions of Article 4(6) of Directive 91/414/EEC, shall be as short as possible and shall expire on 30 May 2011 at the latest.
Morebitno podaljšanje roka, ki ga odobrijo države članice v skladu z določbami člena 4(6) Direktive 91/414/EGS, je čim krajše in traja največ do 30. maja 2011.
Done at Brussels, 30 November 2009.
V Bruslju, 30. novembra 2009
EFSA Scientific Report (2008), 188.
Znanstveno poročilo EFSA (2008) 188.
Conclusion on the peer review of diphenylamine (finalised 30 September 2008).
Sklep o strokovnem pregledu difenilamina (dokončano: 30. septembra 2008).
concerning the non-inclusion of triazoxide in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance
o nevključitvi triazoksida v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o preklicu registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo navedeno snov
That list includes triazoxide.
Navedeni seznam vključuje triazoksid.
For triazoxide the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed in accordance with the provisions laid down in Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 and (EC) No 1490/2002 for a range of uses proposed by the notifier.
Vplivi triazoksida na zdravje ljudi in okolje so bili ocenjeni v skladu z določbami uredb (ES) št. 451/2000 in (ES) št. 1490/2002 za vrste uporab, ki jih je predlagal prijavitelj.
For triazoxide the rapporteur Member State was the United Kingdom and all relevant information was submitted on 25 June 2007.
Država članica poročevalka za triazoksid je bila Združeno kraljestvo, vse ustrezne informacije pa so bile predložene 25. junija 2007.
The assessment report has been peer reviewed by the Member States and the EFSA within its Working Group evaluation and presented to the Commission on 30 September 2008 in the format of the EFSA conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance triazoxide [4].
Poročilo o oceni so v okviru delovne skupine za ocenjevanje pregledali strokovnjaki držav članic in EFSA ter ga 30. septembra 2008 predložili Komisiji v obliki sklepa EFSA o strokovnem pregledu ocene tveganja pesticidov z aktivno snovjo triazoksid [4].
This report has been reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 26 February 2009 in the format of the Commission review report for triazoxide.
To poročilo so države članice in Komisija pregledale v okviru Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter končno različico pripravile 26. februarja 2009 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu glede triazoksida.
In particular it was not possible to perform a reliable consumer risk assessment as data are missing to determine the nature of residues in plant commodities and the possible transfer of residues in animal products.
Zlasti ni bilo mogoče pripraviti zanesljive ocene tveganja za potrošnike, saj manjkajo podatki za določitev lastnosti ostankov v rastlinskih proizvodih in morebitnega prenosa ostankov v živalske proizvode.
Moreover, the available data did not demonstrate that the long-term risk to mammals, birds, fish and earthworms are acceptable.
Poleg tega razpoložljivi podatki niso izkazali, da je dolgoročno tveganje za sesalce, ptice, ribe in deževnike sprejemljivo.
Consequently, it was not possible to conclude on the basis of the information available that triazoxide met the criteria for inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Zato na podlagi predloženih informacij ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, da triazoksid izpolnjuje pogoje za vključitev v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
However, despite the arguments put forward by the notifier, the concerns identified could not be eliminated, and assessments made on the basis of the information submitted and evaluated during the EFSA expert meetings have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing triazoxide satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Toda kljub argumentom, ki jih je prijavitelj predložil, se navedenih pomislekov ni dalo odpraviti, po ocenah na podlagi predloženih informacij, preučenih na srečanjih strokovnjakov EFSA, pa ne kaže pričakovati, da bi lahko fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo triazoksid, pod predvidenimi pogoji uporabe na splošno izpolnjevala zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
Triazoxide should therefore not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Triazoksid se zato ne sme vključiti v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Measures should be taken to ensure that authorisations granted for plant protection products containing triazoxide are withdrawn within a fixed period of time and are not renewed and that no new authorisations for such products are granted.
Sprejeti je treba ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo triazoksid, prekličejo v predpisanem roku in se ne podaljšajo ali izdajo nove registracije takih sredstev.
Any period of grace granted by a Member State for the disposal, storage, placing on the market and use of existing stocks of plant protection products containing triazoxide should be limited to 12 months in order to allow existing stocks to be used in one further growing season, which ensures that plant protection products containing triazoxide remain available to farmers for 18 months from the adoption of this Decision.
Če države članice odobrijo podaljšanje roka za odstranjevanje, skladiščenje, dajanje v promet in uporabo obstoječih zalog fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo triazoksid, ga je treba omejiti na obdobje dvanajstih mesecev, da se omogoči uporaba obstoječih zalog v naslednji rastni sezoni, s čimer se zagotovi, da fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo triazoksid, ostanejo kmetom na razpolago 18 mesecev po sprejetju te odločbe.
This Decision does not prejudice the submission of an application for triazoxide according to the provisions of Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, the detailed implementation rules of which have been laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I [5], in view of a possible inclusion in its Annex I.
Ta odločba ne vpliva na predložitev zahtevka za triazoksid v skladu z določbami člena 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS, katere podrobna pravila za izvajanje so določena v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 33/2008 z dne 17. januarja 2008 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS glede rednega in pospešenega postopka za oceno aktivnih snovi, ki so bile del programa dela iz člena 8(2) navedene direktive, vendar niso bile vključene v Prilogo I [5], zaradi morebitne vključitve v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi.
Triazoxide shall not be included as an active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Triazoksid se ne vključi kot aktivna snov v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
authorisations for plant protection products containing triazoxide are withdrawn by 30 May 2010;
se registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo triazoksid, prekličejo do 30. maja 2010;
no authorisations for plant protection products containing triazoxide are granted or renewed from the date of publication of this Decision.
se od datuma objave te odločbe nobene registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo triazoksid, ne odobrijo ali podaljšajo.
EFSA Scientific Report (2008), 193.
Znanstveno poročilo EFSA (2008) 193.
Conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance triazoxide (finalised 26 September 2008).
Sklep o strokovnem pregledu ocene tveganja pesticidov z aktivno snovjo triazoksid (dokončano: 26. septembra 2008).
on transitional measures under Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regard the processing of non-compliant raw milk in certain milk processing establishments in Bulgaria
o prehodnih ukrepih na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 853/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede predelave surovega mleka, ki ne izpolnjuje zahtev, v nekaterih obratih za predelavo mleka v Bolgariji
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin [1] and in particular Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 853/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o posebnih higienskih pravilih za živila živalskega izvora [1] in zlasti člena 9 Uredbe,
Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs [2] lays down general rules for food business operators on the hygiene of foodstuffs based amongst others on the principles of hazard analysis and critical control points.
Uredba (ES) št. 852/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o higieni živil [2] določa splošna pravila o higieni živil za nosilce živilske dejavnosti, ki med drugim temeljijo na načelih analize tveganj in kritičnih kontrolnih točk.
The rules laid down in Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 include hygiene requirements for raw milk and dairy products.
Pravila iz Uredbe (ES) št. 853/2004 vključujejo higienske zahteve za surovo mleko in mlečne izdelke.
Pursuant to point (c) of Section B of Chapter 4 of Annex VI to the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania (the Act of Accession), Bulgaria has been granted a transitional period, expiring on 31 December 2009, for compliance by certain milk processing establishments with those hygiene requirements.
V skladu s točko (c) oddelka B poglavja 4 Priloge VI k Aktu o pristopu Bolgarije in Romunije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Akt o pristopu) je bilo Bolgariji do 31. decembra 2009 odobreno prehodno obdobje za izpolnitev navedenih higienskih zahtev za nekatere obrate za predelavo mleka.
Certain establishments which are authorised to process raw milk which does not comply with the requirements laid down in Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 (non-compliant milk) are listed in Chapter I of the Appendix to Annex VI to the Act of Accession.
Nekateri obrati, ki imajo dovoljenje za predelavo mleka, ki ne izpolnjuje zahtev iz Uredbe (ES) št. 853/2004 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: mleko, ki ne izpolnjuje zahtev), so vključeni v seznam v poglavju I Dodatka k Prilogi VI k Aktu o pristopu.
Certain establishments which are authorised to process both compliant and non-compliant milk, provided that such processing is carried out on separate production lines, are listed in Chapter II of that Appendix.
Nekateri obrati, ki imajo dovoljenje za predelavo mleka, ki izpolnjuje zahteve, in mleka, ki teh zahtev ne izpolnjuje, pod pogojem, da ta predelava poteka v ločenih proizvodnih linijah, so vključeni v seznam v poglavju II navedenega dodatka.
Milk production holdings that do not comply with the hygiene requirements laid down in Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 are spread over the whole territory of Bulgaria.
Gospodarstva za pridelavo mleka, ki ne izpolnjujejo higienskih zahtev iz Uredbe (ES) št. 853/2004, se nahajajo po vsem ozemlju Bolgarije.
The proportion of raw milk that complies with those requirements, delivered to milk processing establishments in Bulgaria, has only increased slightly during the last years.
Delež surovega mleka, ki izpolnjuje navedene zahteve, dostavljenega obratom za predelavo mleka v Bolgariji, se je v zadnjih letih le rahlo povečal.