natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission officially advised the authorities of the PRC and Thailand, the producers/exporters in the PRC and Thailand, the importers in the Community known to be concerned and the Community industry of the initiation of the investigation.
Komisija je o začetku preiskave uradno obvestila organe LRK in Tajske, proizvajalce/izvoznike v LRK in na Tajskem, uvoznike v Skupnosti, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter industrijo Skupnosti.
Questionnaires were sent to known producers/exporters in the PRC and in Thailand as well as to the importers in the Community known to the Commission from the original investigation and to parties that had made themselves known within the deadlines specified in Article 3 of the initiating Regulation.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani znanim proizvajalcem/izvoznikom v LRK in na Tajskem, uvoznikom v Skupnosti, ki so bili Komisiji znani iz prvotne preiskave, ter strankam, ki so se javile v rokih iz člena 3 začetne uredbe.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the initiating Regulation.
Zainteresiranim strankam je bila dana možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča ter zaprosijo za zaslišanje v roku iz začetne uredbe.
No replies to the questionnaires were received from exporters/producers in Thailand, nor did the Commission receive any comments from the Thai authorities.
Izvozniki/proizvajalci na Tajskem niso predložili izpolnjenih vprašalnikov, prav tako Komisija ni prejela nobenih pripomb tajskih organov.
Only one Thai exporter/producer of HPT, which, according to information at the disposal of the Commission at the time of initiation, exported HPT to the Community during the period 2005 up to the IP (as defined in recital 10) and had assembly operations of HPT in Thailand, submitted that it has ceased to exist as from April 2008.
Le eden tajski izvoznik/proizvajalec HPT, ki je po informacijah, ki so bile Komisiji na voljo v času začetka preiskave, izvažal HPT v Skupnost med letom 2005 in OP (kot je opredeljeno v uvodni izjavi 10) in sestavljal HPT na Tajskem, je sporočil, da od aprila 2008 ne obstaja več.
One Chinese exporting producer replied to the questionnaire by declaring its export sales to the EC as well as some very minor exports of the product concerned to Thailand.
En kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik je vrnil izpolnjeni vprašalnik, tako da je prijavil svojo izvozno prodajo v ES ter zelo majhno količino izvoza zadevnega izdelka na Tajsko.
No comments were received from the Chinese authorities.
Kitajski organi niso poslali nobenih pripomb.
Finally, nine Community importers submitted questionnaire replies reporting their imports from China and Thailand.
Ne nazadnje je devet uvoznikov v Skupnosti predložilo izpolnjene vprašalnike, v katerih so poročali o svojem uvozu iz Kitajske in Tajske.
In general, from their replies it is concluded that there was an increase of imports from Thailand and a sudden decrease of the imports from the PRC in 2006, the year after definitive anti-dumping duties came into force.
Na splošno se na podlagi njihovih odgovorov v letu 2006, letu po začetku veljavnosti protidampinških dajatev, ugotavlja povečanje uvoza iz Tajske in nenaden padec uvoza iz LRK.
In the following years, the imports from the PRC increased again while at the same time imports from Thailand slightly decreased but still remained well above the 2005 levels.
V naslednjih letih je uvoz iz LRK ponovno narasel, obenem pa je uvoz iz Tajske rahlo upadel, a še vedno ostal precej nad ravnjo iz leta 2005.
The investigation period covered the period from 1 September 2007 to 31 August 2008 (the IP).
Obdobje preiskave je trajalo od 1. septembra 2007 do 31. avgusta 2008 („OP“).
Data were collected from 2005 up to the end of the IP to investigate the alleged change in the pattern of trade and the other aspects set out in Article 13 of the basic Regulation.
Za preiskavo domnevnih sprememb v vzorcu trgovanja in drugih vidikov iz člena 13 osnovne uredbe so bili zbrani podatki od leta 2004 do konca OP.
General considerations/degree of cooperation/methodology
Splošni premisleki/stopnja sodelovanja/metodologija
As mentioned in recital 7, no producers/exporters of HPT in Thailand cooperated in the investigation and provided the necessary data.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 7, noben proizvajalec/izvoznik HPT na Tajskem ni sodeloval v preiskavi in predložil potrebnih podatkov.
Thus, the Commission was not in a position to verify directly at the source the nature of the imports consigned from Thailand.
Tako Komisija ni mogla neposredno pri viru preveriti narave uvoza iz Tajske.
Accordingly, findings in respect of HPT consigned from Thailand to the Community had to be made on the basis of the facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Temu ustrezno so morale ugotovitve v zvezi s HPT, poslanimi iz Tajske v Skupnost, v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe temeljiti na razpoložljivih dejstvih.
In this context it is noted that neither the information received from the PRC nor from Community importers allowed the Commission to determine the nature of these imports.
S tem v zvezi se opozarja, da Komisiji ni bilo mogoče določiti narave tega uvoza niti na podlagi informacij, poslanih iz LRK, niti na podlagi informacij, ki so jih poslali uvozniki Skupnosti.
In accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the assessment of the existence of circumvention was done by analysing whether there was a change in the pattern of trade between third countries and the Community, whether the change stemmed from a practice, process or work for which there was insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the duty, whether there was evidence of injury or that the remedial effects of the duty were being undermined in terms of prices and/or quantities of the like product, and whether there was evidence of dumping in relation to the normal values previously established for the like product, if necessary in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 13(1) osnovne uredbe se je izogibanje ugotavljalo s proučevanjem, ali se je spremenil vzorec trgovanja med tretjo državo in Skupnostjo, ali je ta sprememba nastala zaradi prakse, postopka ali dela, za katere razen uvedbe dajatve ni zadostnega ustreznega vzroka ali ekonomske upravičenosti, ali so dokazi o škodi ali slabitvi popravljalnega učinka dajatve glede cen in/ali količin podobnega izdelka in ali so dokazi o dampingu glede na normalne vrednosti, ki so bile pred tem določene za podobni izdelek, po potrebi v skladu z določbami člena 2 osnovne uredbe.
The product concerned is hand pallet trucks and their essential parts, i.e. chassis and hydraulics (HPT), normally declared under CN code ex84279000 and ex84312000 originating in the PRC.
Zadevni izdelek so ročni vozički za premeščanje palet in njihovi osnovni deli, kot sta šasija in hidravlika („HPT“), običajno uvrščeni pod oznaki KN ex84279000 in ex84312000, s poreklom iz LRK.
HPT are defined as trucks with wheels supporting lifting fork arms for handling pallets, designed to be manually pushed, pulled and steered, on smooth, level, hard surfaces, by a pedestrian operator using an articulated tiller.
HPT so opredeljeni kot vozički z dvižnimi vilicami za manipuliranje palet, ki so namenjeni temu, da jih upravljavec na tleh z uporabo premičnega krmila potiska, vleče ali krmili na gladki ravni in trdi površini.
HPT are only designed to raise a load, by pumping the tiller, to a height sufficient for transporting and do not have any other additional functions or uses such as for example (i) to move and to lift the loads in order to place them higher or assist in storage of loads (highlifters), (ii) to stack one pallet above the other (stackers), (iii) to lift the load to a working level (scissorlifts) or (iv) to lift and to weigh the loads (weighing trucks).
HPT imajo le eno funkcijo, in sicer da omogočijo dvigovanje tovora z zamahovanjem krmila do višine, primerne za prevažanje, in nimajo nobenih drugih dodatnih funkcij ali uporab, kot na primer (i) za premeščanje ali dvigovanje tovora, da bi se ga postavilo više, ali za pomoč pri skladiščenju tovora (dvigalne naprave), (ii) za nakladanje ene palete na drugo (nakladalniki), (iii) za dvigovanje tovora na delovno površino (škarjasta dvigala) ali (iv) za dvigovanje in tehtanje tovora (vozički za tehtanje).
The product under investigation is hand pallet trucks (having the same definition as the product concerned) and their essential parts, i.e. chassis and hydraulics, consigned from Thailand (the product under investigation) whether declared as originating in Thailand or not, normally declared under the same CN codes as the product concerned.
Izdelek v preiskavi so ročni vozički za premeščanje palet (z isto opredelitvijo kot zadevni izdelek) in njihovi osnovni deli, kot sta šasija in hidravlika, poslani s Tajske („izdelek v preiskavi“), s prijavljenim poreklom iz Tajske ali ne, običajno prijavljeni pod istimi oznakami KN kot zadevni izdelek.
From the information available, it was concluded that HPT exported to the Community from the PRC and those consigned from Thailand to the Community have the same basic physical characteristics and the same uses.
Na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij je bilo ugotovljeno, da imajo HPT, ki jih v Skupnost izvaža LRK, in HPT, ki se v Skupnost pošiljajo iz Tajske, enake osnovne fizikalne lastnosti in enako uporabo.
Due to the non-cooperation of any Thai company, the volume and value of Thai exports of the product concerned to the Community were determined on the basis of the information available, which in this case was statistical data collected by Member States and compiled by the Commission pursuant to Article 14(6) of the basic Regulation, and Eurostat data.
Pri preiskavi ni sodelovala nobena tajska družba, zato sta bila obseg in vrednost tajskega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost določena na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij, torej v tem primeru statističnih podatkov, ki so jih države članice zbrale in poslale Komisiji na podlagi člena 14(6) osnovne uredbe in podatkov Eurostata.
As regards the data provided in the replies of the Community importers, the investigation established that the number of Thai exports reported by the Community importers represented only a very minor part of the total Thai exports of HPT during the IP, namely less than 5 %.
Kar zadeva podatke iz izpolnjenih vprašalnikov, ki so jih poslali uvozniki Skupnosti, je preiskava pokazala, da je količina tajskega izvoza, ki so jo Komisiji sporočili tajski uvozniki, predstavljala le neznaten del celotnega tajskega izvoza HPT med OP, tj. manj kot 5 %.
Under these circumstances it was considered that the statistical data at the Commission’s disposal portrays more accurately the situation with respect to the volume and value of Thai exports than the limited information made available by Community importers.
V teh okoliščinah se je štelo, da statistični podatki, ki jih ima na voljo Komisija, natančneje prikazujejo situacijo glede količine in vrednosti tajskega izvoza kot omejene informacije, ki so jih dali na voljo uvozniki Skupnosti.
Following the imposition of the anti-dumping measures imports of HPT from Thailand increased from 7458 trucks in 2005 to 64706 trucks in 2007 and decreased to 42056 trucks during the IP.
Po uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov se je uvoz HPT iz Tajske povečal s 7458 vozičkov v letu 2005 na 64706 vozičkov v letu 2007 in se med OP zmanjšal na 42056 vozičkov.
Indeed, Chinese exports from this particular party represent the overwhelming percentage of the increase of imports into the EC of HPT from the PRC between 2005 and the end of the IP.
Kitajski izvoz te stranke dejansko predstavlja prevladujoči delež povišanja uvoza HPT iz LRK v ES med letom 2005 in koncem OP.
Account taken of the above situation, it is concluded that there was a change in the pattern of trade between the EC, the PRC and Thailand.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedene situacije se sklene, da se je vzorec trgovanja med ES, LRK in Tajsko spremenil.
Imports from the PRC continued to increase but this is directly attributed to the export performance of one of the Chinese exporting producers which cooperated with the original investigation and was attributed the lowest anti-dumping duty.
Uvoz iz LRK je še naprej naraščal, vendar je to neposredna posledica ustvarjenega izvoza enega od kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki je sodeloval v prvotni preiskavi in mu je bila pripisana najnižja protidampinška dajatev.
On the other hand, imports from Thailand increased by 868 % from 2005 to 2007 and stabilised during the IP to an increase of 564 % with respect to 2005.
Na drugi strani pa se je uvoz iz Tajske med letoma 2005 in 2007 povečal za 868 % in se med OP ustalil, tako da je povečanje v primerjavi z letom 2005 znašalo 564 %.
In sum, the trade pattern found, although showing persistence in exports from the PRC also shows a significant increase of exports from Thailand.
Ugotovljeni vzorec trgovanja kljub očitnemu nadaljevanju izvoza iz LRK kaže tudi znatno povečanje izvoza iz Tajske.
The persistence or continued increase, albeit much smaller between 2007 and the IP than that found in the original investigation, of exports from the PRC, can be explained by noting that the overwhelming majority of the exports come from the Chinese company with the lowest anti-dumping duty rate.
Nadaljevanje ali stalno naraščanje izvoza iz LRK, pa čeprav med 2007 in OP v manjši meri kot v prvotni preiskavi, je mogoče pojasniti le z ugotovitvijo, da je velika večina izvoza prišla od kitajske družbe z najnižjo stopnjo protidampinške dajatve.
The pattern relating to Thailand, on the other hand, could only be explained as the result of actions aiming at the circumvention of measures.
Vzorec v zvezi s Tajsko pa se lahko pojasni kot rezultat dejavnosti, namenjenih izogibanju ukrepom.
The imports into the Community from Thailand started to rise during the period in which the Community conducted its original investigation.
Uvoz v Skupnost iz Tajske je začel v obdobju, ko je Skupnost izvajala svojo prvotno preiskavo, naraščati.
It is recalled that the authorities in Thailand as well as potential Thai producers/exporters were informed of the current investigation.
Treba je opozoriti, da so bili tako organi na Tajskem kot možni proizvajalci/izvozniki obveščeni o sedanji preiskavi.
However no evidence was received that could explain this significant increase nor in fact did any Thai company cooperate with the investigation by submitting the necessary questionnaire replies.
Vendar niso poslali nobenih dokazov, ki bi lahko pojasnili to znatno povečanje, niti ni nobena tajska družba v preiskavi sodelovala in predložila potrebnih izpolnjenih vprašalnikov.
In this respect it should be highlighted that, as mentioned in recital 7, information at the Commission’s disposal at the time of initiation seemed to suggest that there is a significant amount of assembly operations of HPT in Thailand.
S tem v zvezi je treba poudariti, da informacije, ki so bile Komisiji na voljo v času začetka postopka, kažejo, da se na Tajskem izjemno pogosto sestavljajo HTP, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 7.
On the other hand, no evidence was received to indicate that there was a genuine production of HPT in Thailand.
Po drugi strani tudi ni nikakršnih dokazov, ki kažejo na to, da bi se HTP na Tajskem dejansko proizvajal.
On the basis of the available information, it is therefore concluded that, in the absence of any other sufficient due cause or economic justification within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the change in the pattern of trade stemmed from the imposition of the anti-dumping duty on HPT originating in the PRC.
Na podlagi dostopnih informacij se zato sklene, da je sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja nastala zaradi uvedbe protidampinške dajatve na HPT, proizvedene v LRK, saj ni nobenega drugega ustreznega vzroka ali ekonomske upravičenosti v smislu člena 13(1) osnovne uredbe.
Undermining of the remedial effects of the anti-dumping duty (Article 13(1))
Slabitev popravljalnih učinkov protidampinške dajatve (člen 13(1))
The investigation established that imports from Thailand undermined the remedial effects of the anti-dumping duty both in terms of quantities and prices.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je uvoz iz Tajske oslabil popravljalne učinke dajatve tako glede na količino kot cene.
It is recalled that the change in trade flows took the form of an extraordinary increase of imports from Thailand.
Opominja se, da je bila sprememba v trgovinskih tokovih v obliki izrednega povečanja uvoza iz Tajske.
This undermined first the remedial effects of the anti-dumping measures in terms of the quantities imported into the Community market.
Glede na količine, uvožene na trg Skupnosti, so se s tem zmanjšali popravljalni učinki protidampinških ukrepov.
Indeed, should Community imports have taken place from the PRC instead of Thailand, it is more than likely that the quantities imported would have been much lower than those imported from Thailand, in view of the fact that there would have been a need to pay, inter alia, the anti-dumping duty ranging from 7,6 % to 46,7 %.
Če bi uvoz v Skupnost iz LRK namesto iz Tajske, bi bile uvožene količine nedvomno precej nižje od istih, uvoženih iz Tajske, glede na to, da bi bilo v tem primeru treba plačati med drugim protidampinško dajatev v razponu od 7,6 % do 46,7 %.
Second, with respect to prices of the product concerned consigned from Thailand, in the absence of cooperation, it was necessary to refer to Eurostat data (which were confirmed by the data referred to in Article 14(6) of the basic Regulation), which was the best evidence available.
Poleg tega se je bilo treba ob odsotnosti sodelovanja glede cen zadevnega izdelka, poslanega iz Tajske, sklicevati na podatke Eurostata (potrjene s podatki iz člena 14(6) osnovne uredbe), ki so bili najboljši razpoložljiv dokaz.
The information submitted by the Community importers was not considered to be fully reliable for the reasons described in recital 16.
Informacije, ki so jih predložili uvozniki Skupnosti, se zaradi razlogov iz uvodne izjave 16 niso štele za popolnoma zanesljive.
In this respect it was established that during the IP the average import price of Thai exports to the Community was significantly below the injury elimination level of Community prices established in the original investigation.
V zvezi s tem je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila v OP povprečna uvozna cena tajskega izvoza v Skupnost znatno nižja od stopnje odprave škode, ki je bila za cene Skupnosti določena v prvotni preiskavi.
In more concrete terms, the average import price of Thai exports to the Community was found to be 48,9 % lower than the injury elimination level of Community prices established in the original investigation.
Konkretneje, ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bila povprečna uvozna cena tajskega izvoza v Skupnost 48,9 % nižja od stopnje odprave škode, ki je bila za cene Skupnosti določena s prvotno preiskavo.
Hence, the remedial effects of the duty imposed in terms of prices are undermined.
Zato so popravljalni učinki uvedene dajatve glede na cene oslabljeni.
It is therefore concluded that the imports of the product concerned from Thailand undermine the remedial effects of the duty both in terms of quantities and prices.
Zato se sklene, da uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Tajske tako glede na cene kot na količino slabi popravljalne učinke dajatve.
Dumping test (Article 13(1))
Dampinški test (člen 13(1))
As explained in recitals 7 and 16, given the absence of cooperation, in order to determine whether evidence of dumping could be found with respect to the exports of the product concerned to the Community from Thailand during the IP, Eurostat data at CN level were used pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation as the basis for establishing export prices to the EC.
Kakor je razloženo v uvodnih izjavah 7 in 16, so se pri ugotavljanju, ali obstajajo dokazi o dampingu v zvezi z izvozom zadevnega izdelka iz Tajske v Skupnost med OP, kot podlaga za določitev izvoznih cen v ES zaradi nesodelovanja uporabili podatki Eurostata na ravni oznak KN, v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, these export prices were compared with the normal value previously established, in this case the weighted average normal value established in the original investigation.
V skladu s členom 13(1) osnovne uredbe so se te izvozne cene primerjale s predhodno določeno normalno vrednostjo, v tem primeru s tehtano povprečno normalno vrednostjo, določeno v prvotni preiskavi.
In the absence of cooperation and pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation, for the purpose of comparing the export price and normal value, it was considered appropriate to assume that the product mix of the goods observed during the present investigation was the same as in the original investigation.
Zaradi odsotnosti sodelovanja in v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe se je za namen primerjave izvozne cene in normalne vrednosti zdelo primerno predpostavljati, da je bila ponudba blaga, ki je bila proučena v tem obdobju, enaka kot med prvotno preiskavo.
In accordance with Article 2(11) and 2(12) of the basic Regulation, a comparison of the weighted average normal value as established during the original investigation and the weighted average of the export prices during the present investigation’s IP, as established by Eurostat data, expressed as a percentage of the CIF price at the Community frontier, duty unpaid, revealed a significant dumping margin, i.e. 22,5 %.
V skladu s členoma 2(11) in 2(12) osnovne uredbe je primerjava tehtanega povprečja normalne vrednosti, določenega med prvotno preiskavo, in tehtanega povprečja izvoznih cen med OP te preiskave, določenega na podlagi podatkov Eurostata, izraženega kot odstotek cene CIF na meji Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, razkrila znatno stopnjo dampinga, tj. 22,5 %.
Given the dumping margin involved, and the fact that there is no evidence pointing to a significant change in the product mix of exports, it is considered that dumping exists in relation to the normal value established in the original investigation.
Glede na stopnjo dampinga in dejstvo, da ni nikakršnih dokazov o znatni spremembi ponudbe izvoženega blaga, se šteje, da glede na normalno vrednost, ugotovljeno med prvotno preiskavo, damping obstaja.
In view of the findings above it is concluded that circumvention has taken place within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na zgornje ugotovitve se sklene, da je prihajalo do izogibanja v smislu drugega stavka člena 13(1) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with the first sentence of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the existing anti-dumping measures on imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC should therefore be extended to imports of the same product consigned from Thailand, whether declared as originating in Thailand or not.
V skladu s prvim stavkom člena 13(1) osnovne uredbe je treba obstoječe protidampinške ukrepe za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK zato razširiti na uvoz enakega izdelka, poslanega iz Tajske, ne glede na to, ali je prijavljen kot izdelek s poreklom iz Tajske ali ne.
The measure to be extended should be the one established in Article 1(2) of the original Regulation for the non-cooperating parties, i.e. ‘all other companies’.
Razširiti bi bilo treba tisti ukrep, ki je s členom 1(2) prvotne uredbe določen za nesodelujoče družbe, tj. „vse druge družbe“.
Consequently, for the purpose of the present Regulation the rate of the anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community frontier price, before duty, shall be 46,7 %.
Zato stopnja protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti, pred plačilom dajatve, za namen te uredbe znaša 46,7 %.