natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As a consequence of the repeal of Directive 79/373/EEC by this Regulation, Council Directive 93/113/EC of 14 December 1993 concerning the use and marketing of enzymes, micro-organisms and their preparations in animal nutrition [12] should also be repealed.
Zaradi razveljavitve Direktive 79/373/ES s to uredbo bi bilo treba nadomestiti tudi Direktivo Sveta 93/113/ES z dne 14. decembra 1993 o uporabi in prometu encimov, mikroorganizmov in njihovih pripravkov v prehrani za živali [12].
Also, in view of the repeal of Directive 79/373/EEC, and given that this Regulation includes rules concerning the labelling of feed containing additives, Article 16 of Council Directive 70/524/EEC of 23 November 1970 concerning additives in feedingstuffs [13], which remained in force after the repeal of Directive 70/524/EEC by Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, should be repealed.
Prav tako bi bilo treba zaradi razveljavitve Direktive 79/373/EGS in glede na to, da ta uredba vključuje pravila o označevanju krme, ki vsebuje dodatke, razveljaviti člen 16 Direktive Sveta 70/524/EGS z dne 23. novembra 1970 o dodatkih v krmi [13], ki je ostal v veljavi po razveljavitvi Direktive 70/524/EGS z Uredbo (ES) št. 1831/2003.
Unlike food, as defined in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, the definition of feed does not include water.
V nasprotju s hrano, kakor je opredeljena v Uredbi (ES) št. 178/2002, opredelitev krme ne vključuje vode.
Furthermore, given that water is not marketed for animal nutrition purposes, this Regulation should not include conditions for water used in animal nutrition.
Ker se voda ne daje v promet za namene prehrane živali, ta uredba prav tako ne bi smela vključevati pogojev za vodo, ki se uporablja za prehrano živali.
It should, however, apply to feed administered in water.
Velja pa za krmo, ki se živalim daje z vodo.
The use of water by feed businesses is covered by Regulation (EC) No 183/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 January 2005 laying down requirements for feed hygiene [14], which stipulates that clean water should be used whenever necessary in order to prevent contamination that could prove hazardous and that water used in feed manufacture should be of suitable quality.
Po drugi strani je voda, ki jo uporabljajo nosilci dejavnosti proizvodnje krme, zajeta z Uredbo (ES) št. 183/2005 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. januarja 2005 o zahtevah glede higiene krme [14], ki zahteva uporabo čiste vode, kadar je to potrebno za preprečitev onesnaženja, ki bi lahko bilo nevarno, ter da bi morala biti voda, ki se uporablja pri proizvodnji krme, ustrezne kakovosti.
Given the risk of contamination of the feed and food chain, it is appropriate that this Regulation apply to feed for both food and non-food producing animals, including wild animals.
Glede na nevarnost onesnaženja verige krme in hrane je primerno, da se ta uredba uporablja tako za krmo, ki je namenjena živalim za proizvodnjo živil, kot tudi za krmo, ki je namenjena živalim, ki niso namenjene za proizvodnjo živil, vključno z divjadjo.
The responsibilities of the feed business operators laid down in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 183/2005 should apply, mutatis mutandis, in respect of feed for non-food producing animals.
Pristojnosti nosilcev dejavnosti proizvodnje krme iz Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002 in Uredbe št. 183/2005 bi se morale smiselno uporabljati v zvezi s krmo za živali, ki niso namenjene proizvodnji živil.
In order to enforce compliance with this Regulation, Member States should carry out official controls in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules [15].
Da države članice zagotovijo skladnost s to uredbo, bi morale izvesti uradni nadzor v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 882/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o izvajanju uradnega nadzora, da se zagotovi preverjanje skladnosti z zakonodajo o krmi in živilih ter s pravili o zdravstvenem varstvu živali in zaščiti živali [15].
Those controls should include not only the mandatory but also the voluntary labelling particulars.
Navedeni nadzor bi moral vključevati ne le obvezne podatke na oznakah, temveč tudi prostovoljne.
In order to allow control of the compositional data, acceptable tolerances for the labelled values should be determined.
Da se omogoči nadzor podatkov o sestavi, bi bilo treba določiti sprejemljive tolerance od navedenih vrednosti na oznakah.
To manage feed safety risks, the list of materials whose placing on the market for animal nutrition purposes is prohibited, as currently provided for in Commission Decision 2004/217/EC [16], together with a list of materials whose placing on the market for animal nutrition purposes is restricted, should be included in an Annex to this Regulation.
Za obvladovanje tveganj v zvezi z varnostjo krme bi bilo treba v obliki priloge k tej uredbi vzdrževati seznam snovi, katerih dajanje v promet za namene prehrane živali je omejeno ali prepovedano, kakor je zdaj določeno v Odločbi Komisije 2004/217/ES [16], skupaj s seznamom snovi, katerih promet ali uporaba je za namene prehrane živali omejena.
The existence of such an Annex should not, however, be interpreted to mean that all products not listed can, as such, be considered safe.
Obstoja takšne priloge pa si ne bi smeli razlagati, kot da bi zato lahko bili vsi drugi proizvodi, ki niso na seznamu, varni.
The distinction between feed materials, feed additives, and other products such as veterinary drugs has implications for the conditions for the placing of such products on the market.
Ločevanje med posamičnimi krmili, krmnimi dodatki in drugimi proizvodi, kot so veterinarska zdravila, vpliva na pogoje za dajanje takšnih proizvodov v promet.
Feed materials are primarily used to meet animals’ needs, for example for energy, nutrients, minerals or dietary fibres.
Posamična krmila se uporabljajo primarno za zadostitev potreb živali, na primer po energiji, hranilih, mineralih ali prehranskih vlakninah.
They are usually not chemically well-defined except for basic nutritional constituents.
Običajno niso kemično natančno opredeljena, razen osnovnih hranil.
Effects which can be justified by scientific assessment and which are exclusive to feed additives or veterinary drugs should be excluded from the objective uses of feed materials.
Učinke, ki se lahko dokažejo z znanstvenimi ocenami in so rezervirani za krmne dodatke ali veterinarska zdravila, je treba izločiti iz objektivnih namenov uporabe posamičnih krmil.
It is, therefore, appropriate to draw up non-binding guidelines for distinguishing between these kinds of products.
Zato je primerno oblikovati nezavezujoče smernice za ločevanje med temi vrstami proizvodov.
In duly justified cases, the Commission should be empowered to clarify whether a product constitutes feed for the purposes of this Regulation.
V ustrezno utemeljenih primerih bi morala biti Komisija pooblaščena, da pojasni, ali je proizvod krma za namen te uredbe.
The definition of complementary feedingstuffs in Directive 79/373/EEC gave rise to application problems in various Member States.
Zaradi opredelitve dopolnilnih krmnih mešanic v Direktivi 79/373/EGS so v raznih državah članicah nastale težave pri uporabi.
It is appropriate to clarify the distinction between complementary feedingstuffs and premixtures for the purposes of applying Regulation (EC) No 183/2005.
Za namen pravilne uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 183/2005 je primerno pojasniti ločevanje med dopolnilnimi krmnimi mešanicami in premiksi.
In order to allow a uniform application of the legislation, feed materials and complementary feed should not contain additives above a certain level.
Da se zagotovi enotna uporaba zakonodaje, posamična krmila in dopolnilne krmne mešanice ne bi smele vsebovati dodatkov nad določeno ravnijo.
However, highly concentrated feed, such as licking buckets containing minerals, may be used for direct feeding if the composition meets the particular nutritional purpose in respect of the relevant intended use.
Vseeno se za neposredno krmljenje lahko uporablja močno koncentrirana krma, kot so lizalni kamni, ki vsebujejo minerale in jih živali zaužijejo z lizanjem, če sestava ustreza posameznemu prehranskemu namenu glede na ustrezno predvideno vrsto uporabe.
Conditions governing the use of such feed should appear on the labelling in order to ensure that the rules regarding the content of feed additives in the daily ration are complied with.
Pogoji uporabe takšne krme bi morali biti na oznaki, da se zagotovi upoštevanje pravil glede vsebnosti krmnih dodatkov v dnevnem obroku.
Directive 82/471/EEC aims to improve the supply of feed used as direct and indirect protein sources in the Community.
Cilj Direktive 82/471/EGS je povečati ponudbo krme, uporabljene kot neposredni in posredni vir proteinov, v Skupnosti.
That Directive requires a pre-market authorisation procedure for all possible bio-proteins.
Navedena direktiva določa za vse možne bioproteine postopek za izdajo dovoljenja pred dajanjem v promet.
However, only very few new authorisations have been granted to date and the shortage of protein-rich feed is still evident.
Vseeno je bilo v preteklosti izdanih le nekaj novih dovoljenj in še vedno je opaziti pomanjkanje ponudbe krme, bogate s proteini.
Thus, the general pre-market authorisation requirement has proved to be prohibitive, and safety risks could be tackled instead by means of prohibiting risky products based on market surveillance.
Zato se je splošna zahteva za izdajo dovoljenja pred dajanjem v promet izkazala kot preprečevalna, vprašanje tveganja za varnost pa bi se namesto s prepovedjo tveganih proizvodov lahko rešilo z nadzorom trga.
In cases where the outcome of the risk assessment of a bio-protein is negative, its circulation or use should be prohibited.
V primerih, ko je bila ocena tveganja za bioproteine negativna ali je negativna, bi bilo treba promet z njimi in njihovo uporabo prepovedati.
Hence, the special requirement of a general pre-market authorisation procedure for bio-proteins should be abolished, with the consequence that the safety system for such products be the same as for all other feed materials.
Zato bi bilo treba odpraviti posebno zahtevo za splošni postopek za izdajo dovoljenja pred dajanjem v promet za bioproteine, pri čemer bi bil varnostni sistem za te proizvode enak kot za vsa druga posamična krmila.
The existing restrictions or prohibition of certain bio-proteins should not be affected.
Na obstoječe omejitve ali prepoved nekaterih bioproteinov ne bi smelo biti vpliva.
The provisions of Directive 93/74/EEC implemented by Commission Directive 2008/38/EC of 5 March 2008 establishing a list of intended uses of animal feedingstuffs for particular nutritional purposes [17] have proved to be working well.
Pokazalo se je, da določbe Direktive 93/74/EGS, ki se izvajajo z Direktivo Komisije 2008/38/ES z dne 5. marca 2008 o uvedbi seznama predvidenih vrst uporabe krme za posebne prehranske namene [17], dobro delujejo.
The list of intended uses thus established should, therefore, be maintained and provision should be made in this Regulation for its updating.
Uvedeni seznam predvidenih vrst uporabe krme bi bilo zato treba ohraniti, v tej uredbi pa bi bilo treba oblikovati določbe za njegovo posodabljanje.
In particular, the European Food Safety Authority should be consulted on the efficacy and the safety of such feed when, on the basis of available scientific and technological information, there are reasons to believe that the use of the feed in question may not meet the particular intended nutritional purpose or may have adverse effects on animal health, human health, the environment or animal welfare.
Z Evropsko agencijo za varnost hrane bi se bilo treba zlasti posvetovati o učinkovitosti in varnosti takšne krme, za katero se na podlagi razpoložljivih znanstvenih in tehničnih informacij izkaže, da uporaba zadevne krme morda ne izpolnjuje posebnega prehranskega namena ali da ima morda škodljive učinke na zdravje živali in ljudi, na okolje ali na dobro počutje živali.
Scientific substantiation should be the main factor to be taken into account for the purpose of making claims in respect of feed, and feed business operators making such claims should be able to substantiate them.
Znanstvena utemeljitev bi morala biti glavni dejavnik, ki se upošteva za namene trditev glede krme, nosilci dejavnosti proizvodnje krme pa bi morali biti sposobni uporabo takšnih trditev utemeljiti.
A claim may be scientifically substantiated by taking into account the totality of the available scientific data, and by weighing the evidence.
Trditev je lahko znanstveno utemeljena ob upoštevanju vseh razpoložljivih znanstvenih podatkov in tehtanju dokazov.
Labelling serves enforcement, traceability and control purposes.
Namen oznak je uveljavljanje, sledljivost in nadzor.
In addition, labelling should provide the necessary information to purchasers to enable them to make the optimal choice for their needs, and it should be consistent, coherent, transparent and understandable.
Poleg tega bi morale oznake zagotoviti kupcem potrebne informacije, da se lahko optimalno odločijo glede na svoje potrebe, ter bi morale biti usklajene, skladne, pregledne in razumljive.
As purchasers, in particular livestock farmers, make their choices not only at the point of sale where they can inspect the packaging of the feed, the requirements concerning information provided on the labelling must apply, not only to the labels which appear on the products, but also to other kinds of communication between the vendor and the purchaser.
Ker se kupci, zlasti živinorejci, odločajo ne le na prodajnem mestu, kjer lahko pregledajo embalažo krme, morajo biti zahteve za podatke na oznakah veljavne ne le za oznake na proizvodih, temveč tudi za druge oblike komunikacije med prodajalcem in kupcem.
Furthermore, those principles should apply also to the presentation and the advertising of feed.
Poleg tega bi se morale navedene zahteve uporabljati tudi za predstavljanje in oglaševanje krme.
Mandatory and voluntary information is provided on labelling.
Na oznakah so navedeni obvezni in prostovoljni podatki.
The mandatory information should combine general labelling requirements and specific requirements for feed materials or compound feed respectively, and additional requirements in the case of dietetic feed, contaminated material and pet food.
Obvezni podatki bi morali združevati splošne zahteve za označevanje in posebne v primeru posamičnih krmil ali krmnih mešanic ter dodatne v primeru dietetične krme, onesnaženih snovi in hrane za hišne živali.
The present situation with respect to chemical impurities resulting from the manufacturing process of feed materials and from processing aids is not satisfactory.
Trenutne razmere glede kemičnih nečistoč, ki so posledica proizvodnega postopka posamičnih krmil in posledica pomožnih tehnoloških sredstev, niso ugodne.
In order to ensure a high level of feed safety, and thus a high level of protection of public health, and in order to improve transparency, provisions should be adopted laying down acceptable levels of such chemical impurities in accordance with good practice as referred to in Regulation (EC) No 183/2005.
Za visoko raven varnosti krme in s tem visoko raven varovanja javnega zdravja ter za izboljšanje preglednosti bi bilo treba sprejeti predpise, ki bi določali sprejemljivo raven takšnih kemičnih nečistoč v skladu z dobro prakso iz Uredbe (ES) št. 183/2005.
The principle that only certain feed additives have to be labelled once they are used in feed materials and compound feed is working well.
Načelo, da se morajo označiti le nekateri krmni dodatki, potem ko so uporabljeni v posamičnih krmilih in krmnih dodatkih, dobro deluje.
However, the categorisation resulting from Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 needs to be updated and modernised, due also to the fact that pet owners, in particular, might be confused by some additive labelling.
Vendar je razvrstitev iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1831/2003 treba posodobiti in modernizirati, tudi zaradi dejstva, da so lahko zlasti lastniki hišnih živali zmedeni zaradi oznak za nekatere dodatke.
As a consequence of the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) and the dioxin crises, the obligation to indicate the percentage by weight of all feed materials incorporated in compound feed was introduced in 2002 by Directive 2002/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 amending Council Directive 79/373/EEC on the circulation of compound feedingstuffs [18], at the initiative of the European Parliament.
Zaradi kriz v zvezi z bovina spongiformno encefalopatijo (BSE) in dioksinom je bila na pobudo Evropskega parlamenta leta 2002 z Direktivo 2002/2/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2002 o spremembi Direktive 79/373/EGS o trženju krmnih mešanic in o razveljavitvi Direktive Komisije 91/357/EGS [18] uvedena obveznost, da se navede utežni odstotek vseh posamičnih krmil, ki so vključena v krmno mešanico.
Furthermore, the level of food and feed safety has been significantly improved as a result of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 183/2005 and their implementing measures, in particular as a result of the focus put on the responsibility placed on feed and food business operators, the improved traceability system, the introduction of the hazard analysis and critical control points (HACCP) principle in feed businesses and the creation of guides to good hygiene practice in feed businesses.
Nadalje se je bistveno povečala raven varnosti živil in krme zaradi Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002 in Uredbe (ES) št. 183/2005 in njihovih izvedbenih ukrepov, zlasti zaradi osredotočenja na odgovornost nosilcev dejavnosti proizvodnje krme in nosilcev živilske dejavnosti, izboljšanega sistema sledljivosti, uvedbe načela analize tveganj in kritičnih nadzornih točk (HACCP) pri nosilcih dejavnosti proizvodnje krme in oblikovanja smernic za dobro higiensko prakso v dejavnosti proizvodnje krme.
In light of these positive achievements, mirrored in the notifications to the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF), the obligation to indicate the percentage by weight of all feed materials incorporated in compound feed on the labelling is no longer necessary for the purpose of ensuring a high level of feed safety and thus a high level of protection of public health.
Zaradi teh pozitivnih dosežkov, ki so vidni v obvestilih sistema hitrega obveščanja za živila in krmo (RASFF), obveznost za navedbo utežnega odstotka vseh posamičnih krmil, vključenih v krmno mešanico, na oznaki zaradi zagotavljanja visoke ravni varnosti hrane in s tem visoke ravni varovanja javnega zdravja ni več potrebna.
The exact percentages may, however, be provided on a voluntary basis for the purpose of providing adequate information to purchasers.
Natančen odstotek pa se lahko navede prostovoljno za to, da se kupcem zagotovijo ustrezne informacije.
Furthermore, given that the competent authorities have access to information on the exact percentages by weight of all feed materials incorporated in compound feed, they should be able, on the ground of any urgency relating to human or animal health or to the environment, and in accordance with Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights [19], to provide further information to purchasers.
Poleg tega in glede na to, da imajo pristojni organi dostop do informacij o točnih utežnih odstotkih vseh posamičnih krmil, ki so vključena v krmno mešanico, lahko kupcem zaradi kakršnih koli nujnih razlogov v zvezi z zdravjem ljudi ali živali ali v zvezi z okoljem ter v skladu z Direktivo 2004/48/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine [19] priskrbijo nadaljnje informacije.
To ensure proper information for, and to avoid misleading, the purchaser, the exact percentage by weight should, however, be required in those cases where the feed material in question is emphasised on the labelling of a compound feed.
Da se kupcem zagotovijo ustrezne informacije ter da se ne zavajajo, pa je treba zahtevati navedbo natančnega utežnega odstotka posamičnega krmila v primerih, ko je zadevno posamično krmilo poudarjeno na oznaki krmne mešanice.
The indication of the feed materials incorporated in compound feed in descending order of weight already provides important information on compositional data.
Navedba posamičnih krmil, vključenih v krmno mešanico, v padajočem vrstnem redu glede na težo, že zagotavlja pomembne informacije o sestavi.
In certain areas where the producer is not obliged to label particulars, the purchaser should be able to request additional information.
Če proizvajalec ni obvezan navesti podatkov na oznaki, bi moral kupec imeti možnost zahtevati dodatne informacije.
In such cases, a margin of +/– 15 % of the declared value should be maintained.
V takšnih primerih bi bilo treba ohraniti odstopanje ± 15 % dane vrednosti.
The intellectual property rights of producers should be protected.
Pravice intelektualne lastnine proizvajalcev bi morale biti zaščitene.
For the enforcement of such intellectual property rights, Directive 2004/48/EC should apply.
Za uveljavljanje takšnih pravic intelektualne lastnine bi se morala uporabljati Direktiva 2004/48/ES.
It should also be acknowledged that the quantitative composition of compound feed, unlike the names of feed materials contained therein, can, under certain conditions, be considered confidential information to be protected.
Prav tako je treba priznati, da v nasprotju z imeni vsebovanih posamičnih krmil količinska sestava krmne mešanice v nekaterih okoliščinah lahko velja za zaupno informacijo, ki jo je treba varovati.
Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 May 2002 on undesirable substances in animal feed [20] does not apply to the labelling of feed with excessive levels of undesirable substances.
Direktiva 2002/32/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. maja 2002 o nezaželenih snoveh v živalski krmi [20] se ne uporablja za označevanje krme s previsoko vsebnostjo nezaželenih snovi.
Provisions should therefore be laid down in order to ensure adequate labelling and proper implementation of the dilution ban provided for in Article 5 of that Directive, until such contaminated materials have been detoxified by a detoxification establishment, approved in accordance with Article 10(2) or (3) of Regulation (EC) No 183/2005, or until they have been cleaned.
Zato bi bilo treba oblikovati določbe, da se zagotovi ustrezno označevanje in pravilno izvajanje prepovedi razredčenja iz člena 5 navedene direktive, dokler takšnih onesnaženih snovi ne razstrupi obrat za detoksfikacijo, odobren v skladu s členom 10(2) ali (3) Uredbe (ES) št. 183/2005, ali dokler se jih ne očisti.
Derogations from the general labelling requirements should be provided for in so far as the application of such requirements is not necessary to protect human or animal health or consumer interests and would unduly burden the producer or the feed business operators responsible for the labelling.
Določiti bi bilo treba odstopanja od splošnih zahtev za označevanje, saj uporaba navedenih zahtev ni nujna za varovanje zdravja ljudi ali živali ali za varstvo interesov potrošnikov in bi nepotrebno obremenila proizvajalce ali nosilce dejavnosti proizvodnje krme, odgovorne za označevanje.
On the basis of experience, such derogations should be provided for, in particular with respect to feed delivered by one farmer to another for use on his farm, for small quantities, for compound feed not containing more than three feed materials and for mixes of whole plant grains, seeds and fruits.
Na podlagi izkušenj bi bilo treba takšna odstopanja določiti zlasti za krmo, ki jo en kmet dostavi drugemu za uporabo na njegovi kmetiji, za majhne količine, za krmne mešanice, ki ne vsebujejo več kot treh posamičnih krmil ter za mešanice celih rastlinskih zrn, semen in plodov.