natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Council Directive 72/166/EEC of 24 April 1972 on the approximation of the laws of Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and to the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability [3], Second Council Directive 84/5/EEC of 30 December 1983 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles [4], Third Council Directive 90/232/EEC of 14 May 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles [5] and Directive 2000/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 May 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles (Fourth motor insurance Directive) [6] have been substantially amended several times [7].
Direktiva Sveta 72/166/EGS z dne 24. aprila 1972 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o zavarovanju civilne odgovornosti pri uporabi motornih vozil in o izvajanju obveznosti zavarovanja takšne odgovornosti [3], Druga direktiva Sveta 84/5/EGS z dne 30. decembra 1983 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o zavarovanju civilne odgovornosti pri uporabi motornih vozil [4], Tretja direktiva Sveta 90/232/EGS z dne 14. maja 1990 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o zavarovanju civilne odgovornosti pri uporabi motornih vozil [5] in Direktiva 2000/26/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. maja 2000 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o zavarovanju avtomobilske odgovornosti (Četrta direktiva o zavarovanju avtomobilske odgovornosti) [6] so bile večkrat bistveno spremenjene [7].
In the interests of clarity and rationality those four Directives should be codified, as well as Directive 2005/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 amending Council Directives 72/166/EEC, 84/5/EEC, 88/357/EEC and 90/232/EEC and Directive 2000/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles [8].
Zaradi jasnosti in racionalnosti bi bilo treba navedene štiri direktive ter Direktivo 2005/14/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. maja 2005 o spremembi direktiv Sveta 72/166/EGS, 84/5/EGS, 88/357/EGS in 90/232/EGS ter Direktive 2000/26/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o zavarovanju civilne odgovornosti pri uporabi motornih vozil [8] kodificirati.
It should therefore be a key objective of Community action in the field of financial services to reinforce and consolidate the internal market in motor insurance.
Zato bi morala biti okrepitev in konsolidacija notranjega zavarovalniškega trga na področju avtomobilskega zavarovanja ključni cilj ukrepanja Skupnosti na področju finančnih storitev.
Each Member State must take all appropriate measures to ensure that civil liability in respect of the use of vehicles normally based in its territory is covered by insurance.
Vsaka država članica bi morala sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, s katerimi zagotovi, da je civilna odgovornost pri uporabi vozil, ki izvirajo z njenega ozemlja, pokrita z zavarovanjem.
The extent of the liability covered and the terms and conditions of the insurance cover are to be determined on the basis of those measures.
Obseg kritja odgovornosti in pogoji zavarovalnega kritja se določijo na podlagi teh ukrepov.
In order to exclude any possible misinterpretation of this Directive and to make it easier to obtain insurance cover for vehicles bearing temporary plates, the definition of the territory in which the vehicle is normally based should refer to the territory of the State of which the vehicle bears a registration plate, irrespective of whether such a plate is permanent or temporary.
Da se izključi morebitno napačno razlaganje te direktive in da se olajša pridobitev zavarovalnega kritja za vozila, ki imajo začasne registrske tablice, bi se morala opredelitev ozemlja, kjer se vozilo običajno nahaja, nanašati na ozemlje države, katere registrsko tablico vozilo ima, ne glede na to, ali je ta tablica stalna ali začasna.
While respecting the general criterion of the registration plate to determine the territory in which the vehicle is normally based, a special rule should be laid down for accidents caused by vehicles without a registration plate or bearing a registration plate which does not correspond or no longer corresponds to the vehicle.
Ob spoštovanju splošnega pravila, po katerem registrska tablica določa ozemlje, kjer se vozilo običajno nahaja, je primerno določiti posebno pravilo za nesreče, ki jih povzročijo vozila brez registrske tablice ali vozila, ki so opremljena z registrsko tablico, ki ne ustreza ali ne ustreza več zadevnemu vozilu.
In this case and for the sole purpose of settling the claim, the territory in which the vehicle is normally based should be deemed to be the territory in which the accident took place.
V tem primeru in zgolj za namen obravnave odškodninskega zahtevka bi bilo treba za ozemlje, kjer se vozilo običajno nahaja, šteti ozemlje, kjer se je zgodila nesreča.
A prohibition of systematic checks on motor insurance should apply to vehicles normally based in the territory of another Member State as well as to vehicles normally based in the territory of a third country but entering from the territory of another Member State.
Prepoved sistematičnega preverjanja avtomobilskega zavarovanja bi se morala uporabljati za vozila, ki se običajno nahajajo na ozemlju druge države članice, kot tudi za vozila, ki se običajno nahajajo na ozemlju tretje države, vendar prihajajo z ozemlja druge države članice.
The abolition of checks on green cards for vehicles normally based in a Member State which enter the territory of another Member State can be effected by means of an agreement between the national insurers’ bureaux, whereby each national bureau would guarantee compensation in accordance with the provisions of national law in respect of any loss or injury giving entitlement to compensation caused in its territory by one of those vehicles, whether or not insured.
Preverjanje zelenih kart za vozila, ki se običajno nahajajo v eni državi članici in vstopajo na ozemlje druge države članice, se lahko odpravi s sporazumom med vsemi nacionalnimi zavarovalnimi biroji, s katerim bi vsak nacionalni biro jamčil odškodnino v skladu z določbami nacionalne zakonodaje v zvezi z izgubo ali poškodbo, ki daje pravico do odškodnine in jo je na njenem ozemlju povzročilo eno od teh vozil, ki je bilo zavarovano ali ne.
Such a guarantee agreement presupposes that all Community motor vehicles travelling in Community territory are covered by insurance.
Tak sporazum o jamstvu predpostavlja, da so vsa motorna vozila Skupnosti, ki potujejo po ozemlju Skupnosti, zavarovana.
The national law of each Member State should, therefore, provide for the compulsory insurance of vehicles against civil liability, such insurance to be valid throughout Community territory.
Zato je primerno, da se nacionalni zakonodaji vsake države članice predvidi obvezno zavarovanje civilne odgovornosti pri uporabi vozil, ki velja za celotno ozemlje Skupnosti.
The system provided for in this Directive could be extended to vehicles normally based in the territory of any third country in respect of which the national bureaux of the Member States have concluded a similar agreement.
Sistem, ki ga predvideva ta direktiva, bi se lahko razširil na vozila, ki se običajno nahajajo na ozemlju tretje države, glede katerih so nacionalni biroji držav članic sklenili podobne sporazume.
Each Member State should be able to act in derogation from the general obligation to take out compulsory insurance in respect of vehicles belonging to certain natural or legal persons, public or private.
Državam članicam bi moralo biti omogočeno, da glede vozil nekaterih fizičnih ali pravnih oseb, bodisi javnih ali zasebnih, odstopajo od splošne obveznosti obveznega zavarovanja.
For accidents caused by such vehicles, the Member State so derogating should designate an authority or body to compensate for the damage to victims of accidents caused in another Member State.
V primeru nesreč, ki jih povzročijo takšna vozila, bi morala država članica, ki predvidi tako odstopanje, določiti organ, ki oškodovancem v nesrečah, povzročenih v drugih državah članicah, plača odškodnino.
Steps should be taken to ensure that due compensation is paid not only to the victims of accidents caused by these vehicles abroad but also the victims of accidents occurring in the Member State in which the vehicle is normally based, whether or not they are resident in its territory.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba plačilo ustrezne odškodnine ne samo oškodovancem v nesrečah, ki jih povzročijo ta vozila v tujini, temveč tudi oškodovancem v nesrečah, ki se zgodijo v državi članici, na ozemlju katere se vozilo običajno nahaja, ne glede na to, ali stalno prebivajo na njenem ozemlju ali ne.
Furthermore, Member States should ensure that the list of persons exempt from compulsory insurance and the authorities or bodies responsible for compensation of victims of accidents caused by such vehicles is communicated to the Commission for publication.
Med drugim bi morale države članice zagotoviti, da se Komisiji za objavo sporoči seznam oseb, izvzetih iz obveznega zavarovanja, in organov, ki so odgovorni za odškodnino oškodovancem v nesrečah.
Each Member State should be able to act in derogation from the general obligation to take out compulsory insurance in respect of certain types of vehicles or certain vehicles having a special plate.
Državam članicam bi moralo biti omogočeno, da glede nekaterih vrst vozil ali nekaterih vozil, ki imajo posebne tablice, odstopajo od splošne obveznosti obveznega zavarovanja.
However, since the elimination of border controls within the Community means that it is not possible to ensure that vehicles crossing frontiers are covered by insurance, compensation for victims of accidents caused abroad cannot be guaranteed.
Vendar pa zaradi odprave mejnih kontrol znotraj Skupnosti ni več mogoče preverjati, ali so vozila, ki prečkajo mejo, zavarovana, in tako ni mogoče zagotavljati odškodnine oškodovancem v nesrečah, povzročenih v tujini.
Steps should also be taken to ensure that due compensation is awarded to the victims of accidents caused by those vehicles not only abroad but also in the Member State in which the vehicle is normally based.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba ustrezno odškodnino ne samo oškodovancem v nesrečah, ki jih ta vozila povzročijo v tujini, temveč tudi oškodovancem v isti državi članici, v kateri se vozilo običajno nahaja.
For this purpose, Member States should treat the victims of accidents caused by those vehicles in the same way as victims of accidents caused by uninsured vehicles.
V ta namen bi morale države članice oškodovance nesreč, ki jih povzročijo taka vozila, obravnavati enako kot oškodovance nesreč, ki jih povzročijo nezavarovana vozila.
Indeed, compensation to victims of accidents caused by uninsured vehicles should be paid by the compensation body of the Member State in which the accident took place.
Oškodovancem v nesrečah, ki jih povzročijo nezavarovana vozila, bi moral odškodnino plačati organ za zagotavljanje odškodnine države članice, v kateri se je nesreča zgodila.
Where payments are made to victims of accidents caused by vehicles subject to the derogation, the compensation body should have a claim against the body of the Member State in which the vehicle is normally based.
Kadar organ za zagotavljanje odškodnine plačila odškodnino oškodovancem v nesrečah, ki so jih povzročila vozila, za katera se uporablja to odstopanje, bi mu moralo biti omogočeno, da vloži zahtevek nasproti organu države članice, kjer se vozilo običajno nahaja.
After a certain period to allow for the implementation and application of this possibility of derogation, and taking into account the lessons drawn therefrom, the Commission should, when appropriate, submit proposals for its replacement or repeal.
Po izteku določenega obdobja za izvajanje in uporabo te možnosti odstopanja in v luči izkušenj od le-teh, bi morala Komisija, če je to primerno, predložiti predloge za njegovo nadomestitev ali razveljavitev.
Member States’ obligations to guarantee insurance cover at least in respect of certain minimum amounts constitute an important element in ensuring the protection of victims.
Obveznosti držav članic, da zagotovijo zavarovalno kritje vsaj z določenimi minimalnimi vsotami, predstavlja pomemben element pri zagotavljanju varstva oškodovancev.
The minimum amount of cover for personal injury should be calculated so as to compensate fully and fairly all victims who have suffered very serious injuries, while taking into account the low frequency of accidents involving several victims and the small number of accidents in which several victims suffer very serious injuries in the course of one and the same event.
Najnižji znesek zavarovalnega kritja za telesno poškodbo bi bilo treba izračunati tako, da se v celoti in pravično povrne škoda vsem oškodovancem, ki so utrpeli zelo hude poškodbe, pri čemer se upošteva nizka pogostost nesreč z več oškodovanci in majhno število nesreč, v katerih več oškodovancev utrpi zelo hude poškodbe v eni in isti nesreči.
A minimum amount of cover per victim or per claim should be provided for.
Minimalna vsota kritja na oškodovanca in na škodni dogodek bi morala biti določena.
With a view to facilitating the introduction of these minimum amounts, a transitional period should be established.
Zaradi olajšanja uvedbe teh minimalnih vsot je primerno predvideti prehodno obdobje.
However, a period shorter than the transitional period should be provided for, in which Member States should increase these amounts to at least half the levels provided for.
Vendarle bi bilo treba določiti krajši rok od tega prehodnega obdobja, v katerem bi morale države članice povečati svoje vsote na vsaj polovico teh minimalnih ravni.
In order to ensure that the minimum amount of cover is not eroded over time, a periodic review clause should be provided using as a benchmark the European Index of Consumer Prices (EICP) published by Eurostat, as provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 2494/95 of 23 October 1995 concerning harmonised indices of consumer prices [9].
Da se prepreči razvrednotenje minimalne vsote kritja s potekom časa, bi bilo treba določiti klavzulo o rednem pregledu, ki za referenco uporablja evropski indeks cen življenjskih potrebščin (EICP), ki ga objavlja Eurostat v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2494/95 z dne 23. oktobra 1995 o harmoniziranih indeksih cen življenjskih potrebščin [9].
Procedural rules governing such a review should also be laid down.
Primerno je tudi določiti tudi postopkovna pravila za takšen pregled.
It is necessary to make provision for a body to guarantee that the victim will not remain without compensation where the vehicle which caused the accident is uninsured or unidentified.
Določiti je treba organ, ki bo jamčil, da oškodovanec ne bo ostal brez odškodnine, če bo nesrečo povzročilo nezavarovano ali neznano vozilo.
It is important to provide that the victim of such an accident should be able to apply directly to that body as a first point of contact.
Pomembno je določiti, da se lahko oškodovanec take nesreče obrne neposredno na ta organ kot na prvo točko za stike.
However, Member States should be given the possibility of applying certain limited exclusions as regards the payment of compensation by that body and of providing that compensation for damage to property caused by an unidentified vehicle may be limited or excluded in view of the danger of fraud.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba dati možnost, da uporabijo določene omejene izjeme v zvezi s plačilom odškodnin s strani tega organa in zagotovijo, da se lahko odškodnina za materialno škodo, ki jo povzroči neznano vozilo, omeji ali izključi zaradi nevarnosti goljufije.
It is in the interest of victims that the effects of certain exclusion clauses be limited to the relationship between the insurer and the person responsible for the accident.
V interesu oškodovancev je, da se učinki nekaterih izključitvenih določb omejijo na odnos med zavarovateljem in osebo, odgovorno za nesrečo.
However, in the case of vehicles stolen or obtained by violence, Member States may specify that compensation will be payable by the abovementioned body.
V primeru ukradenih ali s silo pridobljenih vozil države članice lahko določijo, da to odškodnino plača zgoraj navedeni organ.
In order to alleviate the financial burden on that body, Member States may make provision for the application of certain excesses where the body provides compensation for damage to property caused by uninsured vehicles or, as the case may be, vehicles stolen or obtained by violence.
Države članice lahko, da bi ublažile finančno breme tega organa, določijo uporabo nekaterih franšiz, kadar ta organ zagotavlja odškodnino za materialno škodo, ki so jo povzročila nezavarovana ali, kadar je primerno, ukradena ali s silo pridobljena vozila.
The option of limiting or excluding legitimate compensation for victims on the basis that the vehicle is unidentified should not apply where the body has paid compensation for significant personal injuries to any victim of the accident in which damage to property was caused.
Možnost omejitve ali izključitve plačila pravične odškodnine oškodovancem iz razloga, da je vozilo neznano, se ne sme uporabljati, če je organ plačal odškodnino za hujše telesne poškodbe kateremu koli oškodovancu iste nesreče, v kateri je bila povzročena materialna škoda.
Member States may provide for an excess, up to the limit prescribed in this Directive, to be borne by the victim of the damage to property.
Države članice lahko predvidijo franšizo do meje, ki jo določa ta direktiva, ki jo nosi oškodovanec, ki mu je bila povzročena materialna škoda.
The conditions in which personal injuries are to be considered significant should be determined by the national legislation or administrative provisions of the Member State where the accident takes place.
Pogoji, pod katerimi se telesne poškodbe štejejo za hujše, bi morali biti določeni v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo ali upravnimi predpisi države članice, kjer se je nesreča zgodila.
In establishing those conditions, the Member State may take into account, inter alia, whether the injury has required hospital care.
Pri določanju teh pogojev lahko država članica med drugim upošteva, ali je bila zaradi poškodbe potrebna bolnišnična oskrba.
In the case of an accident caused by an uninsured vehicle, the body which compensates victims of accidents caused by uninsured or unidentified vehicles is better placed than the victim to bring an action against the party liable.
V primeru nesreče, ki jo povzroči nezavarovano vozilo, organ, ki izplača oškodovane v nesrečah z nezavarovanimi ali neznanimi vozili, lažje sproži postopek proti odgovorni osebi kot pa oškodovanec.
Therefore, it should be provided that that body cannot require that victim, if he is to be compensated, to establish that the party liable is unable or refuses to pay.
Posledično je primerno določiti, da ta organ od oškodovanca, ki mu je treba izplačati odškodnino, ne more zahtevati, da dokaže, da je odgovorna oseba nezmožna plačati odškodnino ali da odškodnine noče plačati.
In the event of a dispute between the body referred to above and a civil liability insurer as to which of them should compensate the victim of an accident, Member States, to avoid any delay in the payment of compensation to the victim, should ensure that one of those parties is designated as being responsible in the first instance for paying compensation pending resolution of the dispute.
V primeru spora med zgoraj omenjenim organom in zavarovateljem civilne odgovornosti glede tega, kdo naj oškodovancu iz nesreče izplača odškodnino, bi morale države članice zato, da bi se izognile vsaki zamudi pri izplačevanju odškodnine oškodovancu, zagotoviti, da je ena od teh strani določena kot odgovorna, da na prvi stopnji plača odškodnino še pred rešitvijo spora.
Motor vehicle accident victims should be guaranteed comparable treatment irrespective of where in the Community accidents occur.
Oškodovancem iz prometnih nesreč bi bilo treba zagotoviti primerljivo obravnavanje ne glede na to, kje v Skupnosti se je nesreča zgodila.
The members of the family of the policyholder, driver or any other person liable should be afforded protection comparable to that of other third parties, in any event in respect of their personal injuries.
Družinskim članom zavarovanca, vozniku ali kateri koli drugi odgovorni osebi bi bilo treba zagotoviti zaščito, primerljivo s tisto za tretje stranke, v vseh primerih telesnih poškodb.
Personal injuries and damage to property suffered by pedestrians, cyclists and other non-motorised road users, who are usually the weakest party in an accident, should be covered by the compulsory insurance of the vehicle involved in the accident where they are entitled to compensation under national civil law.
Telesne poškodbe in materialno škodo, ki jo utrpijo pešci, kolesarji in drugi nemotorizirani udeleženci v prometu, ki so navadno šibkejši udeleženci v nesrečah, bi moralo kriti obvezno zavarovanje vozila, udeleženega v nesreči, če so te osebe po nacionalnem civilnem pravu upravičene do odškodnine.
This provision does not prejudge the issue of civil liability, or the level of awards of damages in respect of a given accident, under national legislation.
Ta določba ne posega v civilnopravno odgovornost ali višino odškodnin v zvezi s posamezno nesrečo po nacionalni zakonodaji.
This objective would be placed in jeopardy if national legislation or any contractual clause contained in an insurance policy excluded passengers from insurance cover because they knew or should have known that the driver of the vehicle was under the influence of alcohol or of any other intoxicating agent at the time of the accident.
Ta cilj bi bil ogrožen, če bi nacionalna zakonodaja ali kakšna pogodbena klavzula v pogodbi o zavarovanju izključevala potnike iz zavarovalnega kritja, ker so vedeli ali bi morali vedeti, da je bil voznik vozila v času nesreče pod vplivom alkohola ali drugih opojnih snovi.
The passenger is not usually in a position to assess properly the level of intoxication of the driver.
Potnik navadno ne more pravilno oceniti stopnje voznikove opojenosti.
The objective of discouraging persons from driving while under the influence of intoxicating agents is not achieved by reducing the insurance cover for passengers who are victims of motor vehicle accidents.
Cilja odvračati ljudi od vožnje pod vplivom opojnih snovi se ne da doseči z zmanjševanjem zavarovalnega kritja za potnike, ki so oškodovanci v prometnih nesrečah.
Cover of such passengers under the vehicle’s compulsory motor insurance does not prejudge any liability they might incur pursuant to the applicable national legislation, nor the level of any award of damages in a specific accident.
Kritje teh potnikov v okviru obveznega avtomobilskega zavarovanja ne vpliva na morebitno odgovornost, ki jo lahko nosijo v skladu z veljavno nacionalno zakonodajo, niti na višine odmerjenih odškodnin v zvezi s posamezno nesrečo.
All compulsory motor insurance policies should cover the entire territory of the Community.
Vse police obveznega avtomobilskega zavarovanja bi morale kriti celotno ozemlje Skupnosti.
This practice is in conflict with the principle set out in this Directive, according to which compulsory motor insurance should cover, on the basis of a single premium, the entire territory of the Community.
Takšna praksa je v nasprotju z načelom te direktive, v skladu s katerim mora obvezno avtomobilsko zavarovanje na podlagi ene same premije zagotavljati kritje na celotnem ozemlju Skupnosti.