natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This situation coincided with the continued presence of high volumes of low-priced imports from the PRC on the Community market and a 5 % decrease in Community consumption.
Ta položaj je sovpadal z nadaljnjo veliko količino poceni uvoza iz LRK na trg Skupnosti in 5-odstotnim zmanjšanjem potrošnje Skupnosti.
The overall sales volume of the Community decreased at the same pace as dumped imports, while the Community industry's prices fell by 5 % to follow the price level of dumped imports.
Celotni obseg prodaje Skupnosti se je zmanjševal z enako hitrostjo kot dampinški uvoz, medtem ko so se cene industrije Skupnosti znižale za 5 %, da bi sledile ravni cene dampinškega uvoza.
Considering the period from 2006 to the end of the IP, it emerged that consumption increased by 11 %.
Ob upoštevanju obdobja od leta 2006 do konca OP je bilo ugotovljeno, da se je potrošnja povečala za 11 %.
The Community industry managed to increase its sales volume by 8 % but dumped imports increased significantly more (+18 %) overall.
Industrija Skupnosti je uspela povečati svoj obseg prodaje za 8 %, vendar se je dampinški uvoz v celoti znatno povečal (+ 18 %).
At the same time, prices of dumped imports fell by over 3 %.
Hkrati so se cene dampinškega uvoza znižale za več kot 3 %.
The Community industry could not benefit from the growth of the market and the reduced COP.
Industrija Skupnosti ni mogla izkoristiti rasti trga in manjših stroškov proizvodnje.
Instead, it had to follow the decreasing trend in sales price and further decreased its prices by 2,5 % during the IP adding further losses to those incurred in 2006.
Namesto tega je morala slediti trendu zmanjšanja prodajnih cen in je med OP dodatno znižala cene za 2,5 %, kar je povzročilo še večje izgube, kot leta 2006.
It is considered that the continued pressure exercised by low-priced dumped imports on the Community market did not allow the Community industry to set its sales prices in line with its costs during the IP.
Šteje se, da nadaljnji pritisk, ki se je izvajal s poceni dampinškim uvozom na trg Skupnosti, ni omogočil industriji Skupnosti, da bi svoje prodajne cene določala v skladu s svojimi stroški med OP.
This explains the loss in market share, the low level of sales prices and of the negative profitability achieved by the Community industry in that period.
S tem so pojasnjene izguba tržnega deleža, nizka raven prodajnih cen in negativna dobičkonosnost, ki jo je v tem obdobju dosegla industrija Skupnosti.
It is therefore provisionally concluded that the surge of low-priced dumped imports from the PRC had a considerable negative impact on the economic situation of the Community industry during the IP.
Zato se začasno sklene, da je nenadna rast poceni dampinškega uvoza iz LRK znatno negativno vplivala na gospodarski položaj industrije Skupnosti med OP.
As mentioned in recital (94) above, the Community consumption of candles increased by 13 % between 2004 and the IP.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (94) zgoraj, se je potrošnja sveč v Skupnosti med letom 2004 in OP povečala za 13 %.
As this allowed the Community industry to operate in an expanding market, the material injury suffered by the Community industry cannot be attributed to the evolution of consumption on the Community market.
Ker se je s tem industriji Skupnosti omogočilo delovanje na rastočem trgu, se znatna škoda, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, ne more pripisati razvoju potrošnje na trgu Skupnosti.
The investigation showed that the imports which were not found to be dumped were sold in the Community market at a relatively high price.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se je uvoz, ki ni bil dampinški, na trgu Skupnosti prodal po razmeroma visoki ceni.
Accordingly, it was considered that these imports did not contribute to the low level of sales prices and the injury suffered by the Community industry.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da ta uvoz ni prispeval k nizki ravni prodajnih cen in škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
The trends in import volumes and prices from other third countries between 2004 and the IP were as follows:
Trendi uvoznih količin in cen iz drugih tretjih držav med letom 2004 in OP so bili:
The import volumes from third countries not concerned by this investigation increased by 7 % over the period considered but remained at a modest level during the IP.
Obseg uvoza iz tretjih držav, ki jih ta preiskava ne zadeva, se je v obravnavanem obdobju povečal za 7 %, vendar je med OP ostal zmeren.
These probably mainly consist in high value niche products imported in particular from the United States of America (USA).
Verjetno vključuje zlasti izdelke visoke vrednosti, ki se uvozijo zlasti iz Združenih držav Amerike (ZDA).
The fact that the increase in Community consumption was more pronounced led to a loss of market share of 0,2 percentage points during the IP.
Dejstvo, da je bilo povečanje potrošnje Skupnosti izrazitejše, je med OP povzročilo izgubo tržnega deleža v višini 0,2 odstotnih točk.
The prices of these imports which were relatively high during the period considered increased by 21 % over that period.
Cene tega uvoza, ki so bile med obravnavanim obdobjem razmeroma visoke, so se med tem obdobjem povečale za 21 %.
On the basis of the above, it was provisionally concluded these imports did not contribute to the material injury of the Community industry.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je bilo začasno sklenjeno, da ta uvoz ni prispeval k znatni škodi industrije Skupnosti.
Producers in the Community not included in the definition of the Community industry
Proizvajalci v Skupnosti, ki niso vključeni v opredelitev industrije Skupnosti
As suggested in recital (92) above, the information available on the market for candles in the Community indicates that producers representing around 40 % of Community production are not included in the definition of Community industry in this investigation.
Kot je predlagano v uvodni izjavi (92) zgoraj, informacije, dostopne na trgu s svečami v Skupnosti, kažejo, da proizvajalci, ki predstavljajo približno 40 % proizvodnje Skupnosti, niso vključeni v opredelitev industrije Skupnosti v tej preiskavi.
Certain Community producers, representing around 17 % of Community production, were opposed to the initiation of the investigation, because most were importing relatively large quantities of candles from the PRC.
Nekateri proizvajalci Skupnosti, ki predstavljajo približno 17 % proizvodnje Skupnosti, so nasprotovali začetku preiskave, ker je večina uvažala iz LRK razmeroma velike količine sveč.
The impact of their imports from the PRC has been taken into account in the analysis of the effect of dumped imports from the PRC made in recitals (136) to (142) above.
Vpliv njihovega uvoza iz LRK se je upošteval v analizi učinka dampinškega uvoza iz LKR, navedeni v uvodnih izjavah (136) do (142) zgoraj.
The remaining Community producers, representing 23 % of Community production, either were silent or neutral concerning the initiation of the present investigation.
Preostali proizvajalci Skupnosti, ki predstavljajo 23 % proizvodnje Skupnosti, v zvezi z začetkom te preiskave niso imeli pripomb ali pa niso zavzeli stališča.
The analysis of data pertaining to the Community market suggested that all the other Community producers did not gain but lost market share on the sales of their own production during the period considered.
Analiza podatkov, ki se nanaša na trg Skupnosti, je pokazala, da vsi ostali proizvajalci Skupnosti med obravnavanim obdobjem niso pridobili tržnega deleža v prodaji lastne proizvodnje, temveč so ga izgubili.
The investigation did not point to any particular problem concerning the competition between Community producers, on the own-produced candles, or to any trade distorting effect which may explain the material injury found for the Community industry.
S preiskavo se ni pokazala nobena posebna težava v zvezi s konkurenco med proizvajalci Skupnosti pri lastno proizvedenih svečah oziroma noben učinek, ki izkrivlja trgovino in bi lahko pojasnil znatno škodo industrije Skupnosti.
Based on the above, it was provisionally concluded that the producers not included in the definition of the Community industry did not contribute to the injury suffered by the Community industry.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je bilo začasno sklenjeno, da proizvajalci, ki niso vključeni v opredelitev industrije Skupnosti, niso prispevali k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
Based on Eurostat and questionnaire replies from the sampled Community producers, total exports of candles outside the Community by the Community producers increased by 10 % over the period considered, namely from 47701 tonnes in 2004 to 52565 tonnes during the IP.
Na podlagi podatkov Eurostata in izpolnjenih vprašalnikov vzorčenih proizvajalcev Skupnosti se je celotni izvoz sveč zunaj Skupnosti, ki so ga opravili proizvajalci Skupnosti, v obravnavanem obdobju povečal za 10 %, in sicer s 47701 ton v letu 2004 na 52565 ton med OP.
The main export markets are Norway, Switzerland and the USA, where the price levels are in general relatively high.
Glavni izvozni trgi so Norveška, Švica in ZDA, na katerih so ravni cen na splošno razmeroma visoke.
The investigation showed that the Community industry managed to increase its exports to third countries, in particular between 2005 and 2006, when Community consumption decreased by 5 %.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je industrija Skupnosti uspela povečati svoj izvoz v tretje države, zlasti med letoma 2005 in 2006, ko se je potrošnja Skupnosti zmanjšala za 5 %.
This relatively good export performance was particularly beneficial during the IP.
Ta razmeroma dober izvoz je bil zlasti koristen med OP.
In view of the above, it is considered that the export performance of the Community industry has not contributed to the injury suffered by that industry in the IP.
Glede na navedeno se šteje, da izvoz industrije Skupnosti ni prispeval k škodi, ki jo je utrpela ta industrija med OP.
Imports of candles by the Community industry
Uvoz sveč s strani industrije Skupnosti
Some interested parties have claimed that the imports of candles from the PRC by the Community industry were a source of self-inflicted injury.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so trdile, da je bil uvoz sveč iz LRK s strani industrije Skupnosti vir samopovzročene škode.
The investigation showed that some producers included in the definition of the Community industry imported candles originating in the PRC in order to complement their range of products.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so nekateri proizvajalci, ki so vključeni v opredelitev industrije Skupnosti, uvažali sveče s poreklom iz LRK, da bi dopolnili svoj obseg izdelkov.
However, the purchases made during the IP were found to be low, namely less than 5 %, compared to the sales volume of the Community producers concerned.
Kljub temu je bil nakup med OP slab, in sicer manj kot 5 % v primerjavi z obsegom prodaje zadevnih proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
On that basis, it was provisionally concluded that the imports of the Community industry of the product concerned from the PRC have not contributed to the material injury they suffered during the IP.
Na tej podlagi je bilo začasno sklenjeno, da uvoz industrije Skupnosti za zadevni izdelek iz LRK ni prispeval k znatni škodi, ki jo je ta utrpela med OP.
Relocation of production by the Community industry
Premestitev proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti
Certain interested parties attributed the losses of capacity utilisation and market share incurred by the Community industry to the fact that they have relocated part of their production to other Member States in the Community, in particular in 2006.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so manjše izkoriščanje zmogljivosti in izgubo tržnega deleža industrije Skupnosti pripisale dejstvu, da so del svoje proizvodnje premestile v druge države članice v Skupnosti, zlasti v letu 2006.
Moreover, they attributed the decrease in sales prices to the conditions of competition prevailing in these Member States where there is allegedly more pressure on sales prices.
Poleg tega so znižanje prodajnih cen pripisale konkurenčnim pogojem, ki prevladujejo v teh državah članicah, v katerih je pritisk na prodajne cene domnevno večji.
The investigation showed that the production capacity of the Community, did not decrease, but steadily increased by 8 % during the period considered.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se proizvodna zmogljivost Skupnosti ni zmanjšala, ampak se je v obravnavanem obdobju enakomerno povečala za 8 %.
In addition, it was found that the main increases in capacity were observed in the periods starting in 2006 and during the IP.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bila glavna povečanja zmogljivosti med obdobji z začetkom v letu 2006 in med OP.
Finally, it was also found that both the production and sales volume of the Community industry increased by 8 % between 2006 and the IP.
Nazadnje je bilo tudi ugotovljeno, da sta se proizvodnja in obseg prodaje industrije Skupnosti med letom 2006 in OP povečala za 8 %.
Accordingly, the claim is contradicted by the findings of the investigation which showed that an increase in production capacity, production and stocks.
Zato je trditev v nasprotju z ugotovitvami preiskave, ki je pokazala povečanje proizvodne zmogljivosti, proizvodnje in zalog.
As mentioned in recital (115) above, the loss in market share suffered by the Community industry was due to the fact that it could not fully benefit from the growth of the market that occurred in that period.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (115) zgoraj, je bila izguba tržnega deleža, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, posledica dejstva, da ta industrija ni mogla v celoti izkoristiti rasti trga, ki se je pojavila v navedenem obdobju.
Furthermore, it was shown in recitals (122) to (124) above that the restructuring actions undertaken by the Community industry in particular in 2006 led to a substantial decrease of 14 % of its average COP in particular during the IP.
Poleg tega je v uvodnih izjavah (122) do (124) zgoraj navedeno, da so se zaradi ukrepov prestrukturiranja, ki jih je izvedla industrija Skupnosti zlasti v letu 2006, bistveno zmanjšali povprečni stroški proizvodnje, tj. za 14 %, zlasti v OP.
There is no indication in the investigation that the Community industry significantly changed its mix of customers in the Community as alleged by the parties in question.
V preiskavi ni bilo znakov, da je industrija Skupnosti bistveno spremenila svojo mešanico strank v Skupnosti, kot to domnevajo zadevne stranke.
Rather it is considered that the price pressure exerted by low price dumped imports from the PRC led to a low level of prices for candles on the Community market.
Namesto tega se šteje, da je pritisk na cene, ki se je izvajal s poceni dampinškim uvozom iz LRK, povzročil nizko raven cen za sveče na trgu Skupnosti.
On that basis, the investigation did not point to a link between the relocation of production undertaken by the Community industry and the material injury it suffered during the IP.
Na tej podlagi preiskava ni pokazala povezave med premestitvijo proizvodnje, ki jo je opravila industrija Skupnosti, in znatno škodo, ki jo je industrija utrpela med OP.
Impact of the existence of a cartel among European paraffin wax producers
Učinek obstoja kartela med evropskimi proizvajalci parafinskega voska
Certain parties claimed that the injury suffered by the Community industry was caused by the price increase in the main raw material, namely paraffin which occurred on the Community market.
Nekatere stranke so trdile, da je škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, povzročilo povišanje cen glavne surovine, tj. parafina, na trgu Skupnosti.
More specifically, they referred to a statement of objection issued by the Directorate General for Competition of the European Commission (DG Competition) in which a cartel amongst European paraffin wax producers was alleged to exist up to the beginning of 2005.
Natančneje so se sklicevale na ugovor, ki ga je izdal Generalni direktorat Evropske komisije za konkurenco (GD za konkurenco), v katerem se je domnevalo, da je kartel med evropskimi proizvajalci parafinskega voska obstajal do začetka leta 2005.
Accordingly the parties asked the Commission to carefully examine the facts and follow any new developments in connexion with the impact of the cartel on the economic situation of the Community industry.
Zato so stranke pozvale Komisijo, naj pozorno prouči dejstva in spremlja nov razvoj v zvezi z učinkom kartela na gospodarski položaj industrije Skupnosti.
The investigation showed that the increase in the paraffin price did not only affect the Community market but also other markets in the world as the evolution of paraffin, an oil derivative, is closely linked to the evolution of the oil price.
Preiskava je pokazala, da zvišanje cene za parafin ni prizadelo le trga Skupnosti, ampak tudi druge svetovne trge, ker je razvoj parafina, ki je naftni derivat, tesno povezan z razvojem cene nafte.
Moreover as explained in recitals (122) to (124) above, the Community industry managed to control its costs during then IP.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah (122) do (124) zgoraj, je industrija Skupnosti uspela nadzorovati svoje stroške med takratnim OP.
The paraffin price increase was countered by substituting paraffin with stearin.
Zvišanje cene parafina se je reševalo z zamenjavo parafina s stearinom.
The Community industry also rationalised its production and managed to significantly reduce its costs which during the IP were kept to levels comparable to 2004 and 2005.
Industrija Skupnosti je racionalizirala tudi svojo proizvodnjo in uspela bistveno znižati svoje stroške, ki so bili med OP na ravneh, primerljivih z letoma 2004 in 2005.
DG Competition has indeed conducted an investigation into the alleged existence of a cartel between certain producers of paraffin wax, the main raw material for the Community candle industry and officially issued its findings at the beginning of October 2008.
GD za konkurenco je izvedel preiskavo v zvezi z domnevnim obstojem kartela med nekaterimi proizvajalci parafinskega voska, ki je glavna surovina za industrijo sveč v Skupnosti, ter je uradno objavil svoje ugotovitve v začetku oktobra 2008.
A first analysis of these findings in relation to the current anti-dumping investigation indicates that the Community industry sourced approximately one third of its paraffin needs from companies participating in the cartel during the IP, namely in 2007.
Prva analiza teh ugotovitev v zvezi s sedanjo protidampinško preiskavo kaže, da je industrija Skupnosti med OP, tj. leta 2007, pridobila približno eno tretjino potreb po parafinu pri družbah, ki so sodelovale v kartelu.
The data verified during that period shows that the average price of paraffin purchased from companies participating in the cartel is in the same range as prices of paraffin purchased from other suppliers in the Community.
Podatki, preverjeni med tem obdobjem, kažejo, da je povprečna cena parafina, kupljenega od družb, sodelujočih v kartelu, na isti ravni kot cene parafina, kupljenega od drugih dobaviteljev v Skupnosti.
It is also worth noting that the prices of paraffin purchased by the Community industry were found to be in line with the prices of paraffin in the PRC, the only information available on non-EU prices at this stage of the investigation.
Prav tako je treba opozoriti, da so bile cene parafina, ki ga je kupila industrija Skupnosti, v skladu s cenami parafina v LRK, kar je bila edina dostopna informacija o cenah zunaj EU na tej stopnji preiskave.
DG Competition initiated its investigation early April 2005 and the period considered for the current investigation included slightly more than a year during which the cartel was found to exist.
GD za konkurenco je začel preiskavo v začetku aprila 2005, obravnavano obdobje za sedanjo preiskavo pa je obsegalo nekoliko več kot eno leto, med katerim je bil ugotovljen obstoj kartela.
It could therefore be argued that the year 2004 is not suitable or representative for the analysis of injury and causal link on the grounds of the existence of a cartel in that year.
Zato se lahko trdi, da leto 2004 ni primerno ali reprezentativno za analizo škode ali vzročne zveze na podlagi obstoja kartela v tem letu.
Considering that it is not unreasonable to assume that the cartel ceased to exist when the investigation of DG Competition started, namely at the beginning of 2005, the trends concerning the economic situation of the Community industry, when the cartel was still existing, namely in 2004, and after when the cartel ceased to exist, namely in 2005, were compared.
Ob upoštevanju, da ni nerazumno predvidevati, da je kartel prenehal obstajati ob začetku preiskave GD za konkurenco, tj. na začetku leta 2005, so se primerjali trendi gospodarskega položaja industrije Skupnosti, ko je kartel še obstajal, tj. leta 2004, in ko kartela ni bilo več, tj. leta 2005.
This comparison indicates that the trends concerning the injury picture of the Community industry remains approximately the same.
Ta primerjava kaže, da ostajajo trendi škode industrije Skupnosti približno enaki.
Taking into account the developments of the injury indicators between 2005 and the IP would therefore not alter the injury picture and the conclusions reached in recitals (130) to (134) above.
Ob upoštevanju razvoja kazalcev škode med letom 2005 in OP se dejstva o škodi in sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (130) do (134) zato ne bi spremenile.
Accordingly, based on information which is currently available, it would appear that the increase in the raw material costs and the cartel could not have had a material impact on the economic situation of the Community industry which was examined in depth from 2004 up to the end of 2007.
Na podlagi trenutno dostopnih informacij se zato zdi, da povišanje stroškov surovin in kartel nista mogla znatno vplivati na gospodarski položaj industrije Skupnosti, ki se je podrobno proučil od leta 2004 do konca leta 2007.
The possible impact the cartel may have had on the Community market will nevertheless be further investigated in the remainder of the investigation.
Možen vpliv, ki bi ga lahko imel kartel na trg Skupnosti, se bo kljub temu dodatno preiskal v preostanku preiskave.
The above analysis has demonstrated that there was a substantial increase in the volume and market share of the low-priced dumped imports originating in the PRC between 2004 and the IP.
Zgornja analiza je pokazala, da sta se obseg in tržni delež poceni dampinškega uvoza s poreklom iz LRK med letom 2004 in OP bistveno povečala.
In addition, it was found that these imports were made at significantly dumped prices which were far below the prices charged by the Community industry on the Community market for similar product types.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bil ta uvoz izveden znatno dampinških cenah, ki so bile precej nižje od cen, ki jih je industrija Skupnosti zaračunala na trgu Skupnosti za podobne vrste izdelka.
This increase in volume and market share of the low-priced dumped imports from the PRC coincided with an overall increase of the demand in the Community but also with the negative development of sales prices, a significant drop in the market share of the Community industry and a deterioration of the main indicators pertaining to its economic situation during the IP.
Ta povečani obseg in tržni delež poceni dampinškega uvoza iz LRK sta sovpadala s splošnim večjim povpraševanjem v Skupnosti in tudi z negativnim razvojem prodajnih cen, bistvenim zmanjšanjem tržnega deleža industrije Skupnosti ter poslabšanjem glavnih kazalcev, ki se nanašajo na njen gospodarski položaj med OP.
The Community industry made substantial losses in 2006 and remained loss-making during the IP.
Industrija Skupnosti je imela velike izgube leta 2006, ki so se nadaljevale med OP.
The examination of the other known factors which could have caused injury to the Community industry revealed that none of these could have had a significant negative impact on that industry in particular during the IP.
Proučitev drugih znanih dejavnikov, ki bi lahko povzročili škodo industriji Skupnosti, je razkrila, da nobeden od teh dejavnikov ne bi mogel imeti takšnega znatnega negativnega vpliva na industrijo, zlasti med OP.