natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to established Commission practice [4], exploration for oil and natural gas constitutes one relevant product market, since it is not possible from the outset to determine whether the exploration will result in finding oil or natural gas.
Glede na uveljavljeno prakso Komisije [4] se odkrivanje nafte in zemeljskega plina štejeta za en proizvodni trg, ker na začetku odkrivanja ni mogoče ugotoviti, ali se bo našla nafta ali zemeljski plin.
It has furthermore been established through the same, long-standing Commission practice that the geographical scope of that market is worldwide.
Komisija je v svoji dolgoletni praksi tudi potrdila, da ima navedeni trg svetovne geografske razsežnosti.
The market shares of operators active in exploration can be measured by reference to three variables: the capital expenditure, proven reserves and expected production.
Tržni deleži gospodarskih subjektov, ki se ukvarjajo z odkrivanjem, se lahko merijo glede na tri spremenljivke: kapitalske naložbe, dokazane rezerve in načrtovano proizvodnjo.
The use of capital expenditure to measure the market shares of operators on the exploration market has been found to be unsuitable, i.a. because of the large differences between the required levels of investments that are necessary in different geographic areas.
Uporaba kapitalskih naložb za merjenje tržnih deležev gospodarskih subjektov na trgu odkrivanja se je izkazala za neprimerno med drugim zaradi velikih razlik med zahtevanimi ravnmi naložb, ki so potrebne na različnih geografskih območjih.
Thus, larger investments are needed to explore for oil and gas in the North Sea than is the case for exploration in, e.g., the Middle East.
Tako so za raziskovanje nafte in plina v Severnem morju potrebne večje naložbe kot npr. na Bližnjem vzhodu.
Two other parameters have typically been applied to assess the market shares of economic operators within this sector, namely, their share of proven reserves and of the expected production [5].
Ponavadi sta bila za ocenjevanje tržnih deležev gospodarskih subjektov v tem sektorju uporabljena ostala dva parametra, tj. delež dokazanih rezerv in načrtovana proizvodnja [5].
As of 31 December 2008, the global, proven oil and gas reserves amounted to a total of 385 billion standard cubic metres oil equivalent (in the following Sm3 o. e.) worldwide, according to the available information [6].
Po razpoložljivih podatkih [6] je bilo 31. decembra 2008 na svetu 385 milijard standardnih kubičnih metrov ekvivalenta nafte (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sm3 (oe)) dokazanih rezerv nafte in plina.
Shell’s part thereof amounted to 1,759 billion Sm3 o. e., giving it a market share of 0,46 %.
Shellov delež teh rezerv je znašal 1,759 milijarde Sm3 (oe), kar pomeni 0,46-odstotni tržni delež.
As of 1 January 2009, the combined, proven oil and gas reserves in Great Britain amounted to slightly more than 0,88 billion Sm3 o. e [7], or slightly more than 0,22 %.
januarja 2009 so skupne dokazane rezerve nafte in plina v Veliki Britaniji malo presegle 0,88 milijarde Sm3 (oe) [7] oziroma nekoliko več kot 0,22 %.
Shell’s share thereof is even smaller.
Shellov delež je pri tem še manjši.
According to the available information, there is a direct correlation between proven reserves of oil and gas and expected future production.
Po razpoložljivih podatkih obstaja med dokazanimi rezervami nafte in plina ter načrtovano proizvodnjo neposredna povezava.
Nothing in the available information therefore indicates that Shell’s market share would be substantially different if measured in terms of expected production rather than in terms of its share of proven reserves.
Nobeden od razpoložljivih podatkov ne nakazuje, da bi bil Shellov tržni delež bistveno drugačen, če bi ga izmerili glede na načrtovano proizvodnjo in ne glede na dokazane rezerve.
Recitals (14) and (17) below present the market shares of Shell of its principal competitors of the production of, respectively, oil and gas.
V uvodnih izjavah 14 in 17 so navedeni tržni deleži Shella in njegovih glavnih konkurentov pri proizvodnji nafte oziroma plina.
Given the links between proven reserves and actual production these figures can be taken as an indication also of the state of competition on the market concerned here.
Glede na povezave med dokazanimi rezervami in dejansko proizvodnjo se lahko te številke razume tudi kot pokazatelj stanja konkurence na zadevnem trgu.
The exploration market is not highly concentrated.
Trg odkrivanja ni zelo koncentriran.
Apart from state owned companies, the market is characterised by the presence of two other international vertically integrated private players named the super majors (BP and ExxonMobil) as well as a certain number of so-called ‘majors’.
Poleg družb v lasti držav je za trg značilna prisotnost dveh drugih mednarodnih vertikalno povezanih zasebnih akterjev, tako imenovanih „super velikih“ (BP in ExxonMobil), ter nekaj tako imenovanih „velikih“.
These elements are an indication of direct exposure to competition.
Ti elementi kažejo na neposredno izpostavljenost konkurenci.
According to established Commission practice [8], development and production of (crude) oil is a separate product market whose geographic scope is worldwide.
V skladu z ustaljeno prakso Komisije [8] je razvoj in proizvodnja (surove) nafte ločen proizvodni trg svetovnih geografskih razsežnosti.
According to the available information [9], the total, daily production of oil worldwide amounted to 81820 million barrels in 2008.
Po razpoložljivih podatkih [9] je leta 2008 svetovna proizvodnja nafte znašala 81820 milijonov sodčkov dnevno.
That same year, Shell produced a total of 1771 million barrels per day, giving it a market share of 2,16 %.
Istega leta je Shell proizvedel skupno 1771 milijonov sodčkov dnevno, kar ustreza 2,16-odstotnemu tržnemu deležu.
For the purposes of this analysis, it is important to have regard to the degree of concentration and the relevant market as a whole.
Za namene te analize je pomembno upoštevati stopnjo koncentracije in zadevni trg v celoti.
In this view, the Commission notes that the market for crude oil production is characterised by the presence of big state owned companies and two other international vertically integrated private players (the so called super majors: BP and ExxonMobil whose respective parts of oil production in 2008 amounted to 3,08 % and 2,32 %) as well as a certain number of so-called ‘majors’ [10].
Glede tega Komisija ugotavlja, da je za trg proizvodnje surove nafte značilna prisotnost velikih družb v lasti držav in dveh drugih mednarodnih vertikalno povezanih zasebnih akterjev (tako imenovanih „super velikih“, BP in ExxonMobil, katerih deleža v proizvodnji nafte sta leta 2008 znašala 3,08 % za prvega in 2,32 % za drugega) ter nekaj tako imenovanih „velikih“ [10].
These factors suggest that the market comprises a number of players between whom effective competition can be presumed.
Ti dejavniki kažejo, da je na trgu več akterjev, med katerimi lahko predvidevamo, da obstaja učinkovita konkurenca.
A previous Commission Decision [11] concerning down-stream supply of gas to end-customers has distinguished between Low Calorific Value (LCV) Gas, High Calorific Value (HCV) gas.
V eni od predhodnih odločb [11] o dobavi plina iz rafinerij končnim uporabnikom je Komisija razlikovala med zemeljskim plinom z nizko kalorično v vrednostjo (LCV) in zemeljskim plinom z visoko kalorično vrednostjo (HCV).
The Commission has also considered whether Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) supplies should be distinguished from supplies of piped natural gas [12].
Komisija je tudi preučila, ali naj se dobava utekočinjenega zemeljskega plina (UZP) obravnava ločeno od dobave plinovodnega zemeljskega plina [12].
However, a subsequent Commission Decision [13] concerning i.a. development and production of natural gas left the question open whether, for the purpose of that Decision, separate markets existed for Low Calorific Value (LCV) Gas, High Calorific Value (HCV) gas and Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), ‘as the final assessment is not affected regardless of the definition adopted’.
V eni od poznejših odločb [13], ki se med drugim nanaša na razvoj in proizvodnjo zemeljskega plina, pa Komisija ni pojasnila, ali so za namene navedene odločbe obstajali ločeni trg plina z nizko kalorično vrednostjo (LCV), plina z visoko kalorično vrednostjo (HCV) in utekočinjenega zemeljskega plina (UZP), saj „sprejeta opredelitev ne vpliva na končno oceno“.
For the purpose of this Decision, the question can also be left open for the following reasons:
Za namene tega sklepa lahko vprašanje ostane nepojasnjeno tudi iz naslednjih razlogov:
Shell does not produce LNG;
Shell ne proizvaja utekočinjenega zemeljskega plina (UZP),
Limited operates in Great Britain (Scotland England and Wales), where the spot market for gas, the so-called National Balancing Point, makes no distinction between LCV and HCV.
Limited deluje v Veliki Britaniji (na Škotskem, v Angliji in Walesu), kjer na prometnem trgu plina, tako imenovanem National Balancing Point, ni razlike med LCV in HCV.
National Grid plc (the British national gas network manager) is responsible for supervising the quality of gas entering the network.
Za nadzor kakovosti plina, ki vstopa v omrežje, je pristojen National Grid plc (državni upravitelj britanskega plinskega omrežja).
As far as the geographic market is concerned, previous Commission Decisions [14] have considered that it includes the European Economic Area (EEA) and possibly also Russia and Algeria.
V predhodnih odločbah [14] je Komisija glede geografskega trga štela, da ta obsega evropski gospodarski prostor (EGP), verjetno pa tudi Rusijo in Alžirijo.
According to the available information [15], the total gas production in the EU amounted to 190,3 billion Sm3 in 2008 and that of the EEA for the same year to 289,5 billion Sm3.
Po razpoložljivih podatkih [15] je skupna proizvodnja plina v EU leta 2008 znašala 190,3 milijarde Sm3, v EGP pa v istem letu 289,5 milijarde Sm3.
Shell’s production for 2008 amounted to 37,60 billion Sm3, giving it a market share of 12,99 %.
Shell je leta 2008 proizvedel 37,60 milijarde Sm3 ter tako imel 12,99-odstotni tržni delež.
For 2008, productions in Russia and Algeria amounted to respectively 601,7 and 86,5 billion Sm3.
Leta 2008 je proizvodnja v Rusiji in Alžiriji dosegla 601,7 oziroma 86,5 milijarde Sm3.
The total production for the EEA plus Russia and Algeria therefore amounted to a total of 976,7 billion Sm3 of which Shell’s share amounted to 3,85 %.
Skupna proizvodnja EGP, Rusije in Alžirije je znašala 976,7 milijarde Sm3, pri čemer je Shell imel 3,85-odstotni delež.
The degree of concentration on the market for natural gas production is also low, considering the presence of the super majors (ExxonMobil and BP with market shares between of between, respectively, [10-20] % and [5-10] %), and of the majors (Statoil and Total with market shares of the order, respectively, of [10-20] % and [5-10] % each), and the pressure of two other important state owned companies namely, the Russian Gazprom and the Algerian Sonatrach (with market shares between [30-40] % and of [10-20] % [16], respectively).
Tudi stopnja koncentracije na trgu proizvodnje zemeljskega plina je nizka, če upoštevamo prisotnost „super velikih“ (ExxonMobil in BP s tržnima deležema med [10 in 20] % oziroma [5 in 10] %) in „velikih“ (Statoil in Total s tržnima deležema med [10 in 20] % oziroma [5 in 10] %) ter pritisk dveh družb v lasti držav, tj. ruskega Gazproma in alžirskega Sonatracha (s tržnima deležema med [30 in 40] % oziroma [10 in 20] % [16].
This provides further indication of direct exposure to competition.
To so dodatni dokazi za neposredno izpostavljenost konkurenci.
In view of the factors examined in recitals (5) to (17), the condition of direct exposure to competition laid down in Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC should be considered to be met in England, Scotland and Wales in respect of the following services:
Glede na dejavnike, preučene v uvodnih izjavah 5 do 17, je treba pogoj neposredne izpostavljenosti iz člena 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES v Angliji, na Škotskem in v Walesu šteti za izpolnjenega za naslednje storitve:
Since the condition of unrestricted access to the market is deemed to be met, Directive 2004/17/EC should not apply when contracting entities award contracts intended to enable the services listed in points (a) to (c) of recital (18) to be carried out in England, Scotland and Wales, nor when design contests are organised for the pursuit of such an activity in those geographic areas.
Ker se ocenjuje, da je pogoj neomejenega dostopa na trg izpolnjen, se Direktiva 2004/17/ES, kadar naročniki v Angliji, na Škotskem ali v Walesu oddajajo naročila, katerih namen je omogočiti izvedbo storitev, navedenih v točkah (a) do (c) uvodne izjave 18, ali kadar so na teh geografskih območjih organizirani natečaji za opravljanje te dejavnosti, ne bi smela uporabljati.
This Decision is based on the legal and factual situation as of October to December 2009 as it appears from the information submitted by Shell and the authorities of the United Kingdom.
Ta sklep temelji na pravnih dejstvih in dejanskem stanju od oktobra do decembra 2009, kakor je razvidno iz podatkov, ki so jih predložili Shell in organi Združenega kraljestva.
It may be revised, should significant changes in the legal or factual situation mean that the conditions for the applicability of Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC are no longer met,
Sklep se lahko spremeni, če bi bistvene spremembe pravnega ali dejanskega stanja povzročile, da pogoji za uporabo člena 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES niso več izpolnjeni –
Directive 2004/17/EC shall not apply to contracts awarded by contracting entities and intended to enable the following services to be carried out in England, Scotland and Wales:
Direktiva 2004/17/ES se ne uporablja za javna naročila, ki jih oddajo naročniki in so namenjena omogočanju izvajanja naslednjih storitev v Angliji, na Škotskem in v Walesu:
This Decision is addressed to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Združeno kraljestvo Velika Britanija in Severna Irska.
See in particular Commission Decision 2004/284/EC of 29 September 1999 declaring a concentration compatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement (Case No IV/M.1383 — Exxon/Mobil) (OJ L 103, 7.4.2004, p. 1) and subsequent decisions, inter alia, Commission Decision of 3 May 2007 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.4545 — Statoil/Hydro) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.
Glej zlasti Odločbo Komisije 2004/284/ES z dne 29. septembra 1999 o združljivosti koncentracije s skupnim trgom in sporazumom EGP (zadeva št. IV/M.1383 – Exxon/Mobil) (UL L 103, 7.4.2004, str. 1) in odločbe, ki so ji sledile, npr. odločbo Komisije z dne 3. maja 2007 o združljivosti koncentracije s skupnim trgom (zadeva št. IV/M.4545 – Statoil/Hydro) v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 139/2004.
OJ L 164, 30.6.1994, p. 3.
UL L 164, 30.6.1994, str. 3.
See in particular the above-mentioned Exxon/Mobil Decision and, more recently, Commission Decision of 19 November 2007 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case COMP/M.4934 — KazMunaiGaz/Rompetrol) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 139/2004.
Glej zlasti navedeno odločbo Exxon/Mobil in pozneje sprejeto Odločbo Komisije z dne 19. novembra 2007 o združljivosti koncentracije s skupnim trgom (zadeva COMP/M.4934 – KazMunaiGaz/Rompetrol) v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 139/2004.
See in particular the above-mentioned Exxon/Mobil Decision (recitals 25 and 27).
Glej zlasti prej navedeno odločbo Exxon/Mobil (uvodni izjavi 25 in 27).
See point 5.2.1 of the application and the sources quoted there, in particular the BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2009, annexed to it.
Glej točko 5.2.1 prošnje in tam navedene vire, zlasti priloženi BP Statistical Review of World Energy (Statistični pregled BP svetovne energije), junij 2009.
That is, 0,34 trillion Sm3 gas, equal to 0,34 billion Sm3 o. e., and 3,4 thousand million barrels oil equal 0,540 billion Sm3, giving a total of 0,88 billion Sm3.
To ustreza 0,34 bilijona Sm3 plina, kar je enako 0,34 milijarde Sm3 (oe), in 3,4 tisoč milijonov sodčkov nafte, kar je enako 0,540 milijarde Sm3; to skupaj znaša 0,88 milijarde Sm3.
See in particular the above-mentioned Exxon/Mobil Decision and, more recently, the above-mentioned KazMunaiGaz/Rompetrol Decision.
Glej zlasti navedeno odločbo Exxon/Mobil in poznejšo navedeno odločbo KazMunaiGaz/Rompetrol.
See p. 8 of BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2009, annexed to request, in the following referred to as BP Statistics.
Glej str. 8 BP Statistical Review of World Energy, junij 2009, ki je priložen prošnji (v nadaljnjem besedilu: BP Statistics).
Whose market shares are smaller than those of the super majors.
Njihovi tržni deleži so manjši od tržnih deležev „super velikih“.
Commission Decision 2007/194/EC of 14 November 2006 declaring a concentration compatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.4180 — Gaz de France/Suez) (OJ L 88, 29.3.2007, p. 47).
Odločba Komisije 2007/194/ES z dne 14. novembra 2006 o združljivosti koncentracije s skupnim trgom in delovanjem Sporazuma EGP (zadeva COMP/M.4180 – Gaz de France/Suez) (UL L 88, 29.3.2007, str. 47).
See in particular the above-mentioned Gaz de France/Suez Decision.
Glej zlasti navedeno odločbo o Gaz de France/Suez.
The above-mentioned Statoil/Hydro Decision, point 12.
Glej točko 12 navedene odločbe Statoil/Hydro.
See for instance those mentioned under Recital (4) above.
Glej npr. odločbe, navedene v uvodni izjavi 4.
See the above-mentioned Statoil/Hydro Decision.
Glej navedeno odločbo Statoil/Hydro.
In accordance with Article 30(5) first subparagraph, the Commission informed the United Kingdom authorities thereof by letter of 21 October 2009, to which the said authorities answered by e-mail of 16 November 2009.
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 30(5) je Komisija 21. oktobra 2009 z dopisom o tem obvestila organe Združenega kraljestva, ti pa so nanj odgovorili po elektronski pošti 16. novembra 2009.
The Commission also requested additional information of Shell by e-mail of 17 November 2009, which was transmitted by Shell by e-mail of 25 November 2009.
Komisija je 17. novembra 2009 od Shella po elektronski pošti zahtevala dodatne informacije, ki jih je ta poslal po elektronski pošti 25. novembra 2009.
amending Decision 2003/135/EC as regards the eradication and emergency vaccination plans for classical swine fever in feral pigs in certain areas of North Rhine-Westphalia and Rhineland-Palatinate (Germany)
o spremembi Odločbe 2003/135/ES glede načrtov za izkoreninjenje klasične prašičje kuge in cepljenja divjih prašičev proti klasični prašičji kugi v izrednih okoliščinah na nekaterih območjih zveznih dežel Severno Porenje-Vestfalija in Porenje-Pfalz (v Nemčiji)
(notified under document C(2010) 1931)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 1931)
Having regard to Council Directive 2001/89/EC of 23 October 2001 on Community measures for the control of classical swine fever [1], and in particular the fifth subparagraph of Article 16(1) and the fifth subparagraph of Article 20(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2001/89/ES z dne 23. oktobra 2001 o ukrepih Skupnosti za nadzor nad klasično prašičjo kugo [1] in zlasti petega pododstavka člena 16(1) ter petega pododstavka člena 20(2) Direktive,
Commission Decision 2003/135/EC of 27 February 2003 on the approval of the plans for the eradication of classical swine fever and the emergency vaccination of feral pigs against classical swine fever in Germany, in the federal states of Lower Saxony, North Rhine-Westphalia, Rhineland-Palatinate and Saarland [2] was adopted as one of a number of measures to combat classical swine fever.
Odločba Komisije 2003/135/ES z dne 27. februarja 2003 o odobritvi načrtov za izkoreninjenje klasične prašičje kuge in cepljenje divjih prašičev proti klasični prašičji kugi v izrednih okoliščinah v Nemčiji, v zveznih deželah Spodnja Saška, Severno Porenje-Vestfalija, Porenje-Pfalz in Posarje [2], je bila sprejeta kot eden izmed številnih ukrepov za boj proti klasični prašičji kugi.
Germany has informed the Commission about the recent evolution of that disease in feral pigs in certain areas of the federal states of North Rhine-Westphalia and Rhineland-Palatinate.
Nemčija je Komisijo obvestila o nedavnem razvoju navedene bolezni pri divjih prašičih na nekaterih območjih v zveznih deželah Severno Porenje-Vestfalija in Porenje-Pfalz.
That information indicates that classical swine fever in feral pigs has been eradicated in certain areas in the south of Rhineland-Palatinate and in the region of Eifel.
Navedene informacije kažejo, da je bila klasična prašičja kuga pri divjih prašičih na nekaterih območjih na jugu zvezne države Porenje-Pfalz in v regiji Eifel izkoreninjena.
Accordingly, the eradication and emergency vaccination plans for classical swine fever in feral pigs no longer need to be applied in those particular areas.
Zato na navedenih območjih ni več treba izvajati načrtov za izkoreninjenje klasične prašičje kuge in cepljenje divjih prašičev proti klasični prašičji kugi v izrednih okoliščinah.
The Annex to Decision 2003/135/EC is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga k Odločbi 2003/135/ES se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge k temu sklepu.
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Zvezno republiko Nemčijo in Francosko republiko.
The Kreise Altenkirchen and Neuwied.
Okrožji Altenkirchen in Neuwied.
In the Kreis Westerwald: the municipalities Bad Marienberg, Hachenburg, Ransbach-Baumbach, Rennerod, Selters, Wallmerod and Westerburg, the municipality Höhr-Grenzhausen north of the motorway A48, the municipality Montabaur north of the motorway A3 and the municipality Wirges north of the motorways A48 and A3.
V okrožju Westerwald: občine Bad Marienberg, Hachenburg, Ransbach-Baumbach, Rennerod, Selters, Wallmerod in Westerburg, občina Höhr-Grenzhausen, severno od avtoceste A48, občina Montabaur, severno od avtoceste A3, in občina Wirges, severno od avtocest A48 in A3.
In the Landkreis Südwestpfalz: the municipalities Thaleischweiler-Fröschen, Waldfischbach-Burgalben, Rodalben and Wallhalben.
V okrožju Südwestpfalz: občine Thaleischweiler-Fröschen, Waldfischbach-Burgalben, Rodalben in Wallhalben.
In the Kreis Kaiserslautern: the municipalities Bruchmühlbach-Miesau south of the motorway A6, Kaiserslautern-Süd and Landstuhl.
V okrožju Kaiserslautern: občine Bruchmühlbach-Miesau južno od avtoceste A6, Kaiserslautern-Süd in Landstuhl.
The city of Kaiserslautern south of the motorway A6.
Mesto Kaiserslautern, južno od avtoceste A6.
In the federal state North Rhine-Westphalia
V zvezni deželi Severno Porenje-Vestfalija
In the Rhein-Sieg-Kreis: the cities Bad Honnef, Königswinter, Hennef (Sieg), Sankt Augustin, Niederkassel, Troisdorf, Siegburg and Lohmar and the municipalities Neunkirchen-Seelscheid, Eitorf, Ruppichteroth, Windeck and Much.
V okrožju Rhein-Sieg: mesta Bad Honnef, Königswinter, Hennef (Sieg), Sankt Augustin, Niederkassel, Troisdorf, Siegburg in Lohmar ter občine Neunkirchen-Seelscheid, Eitorf, Ruppichteroth, Windeck in Much.
In the Kreis Siegen-Wittgenstein: in the municipality Kreuztal the localities Krombach, Eichen, Fellinghausen, Osthelden, Junkernhees and Mittelhees, in the city Siegen the localities Sohlbach, Dillnhütten, Geisweid, Birlenbach, Trupbach, Seelbach, Achenbach, Lindenberg, Rosterberg, Rödgen, Obersdorf, Eisern and Eiserfeld, the municipalities Freudenberg, Neunkirchen and Burbach, in the municipality Wilnsdorf the localities Rinsdorf and Wilden.
V okrožju Siegen-Wittgenstein: v občini Kreuztal kraji Krombach, Eichen, Fellinghausen, Osthelden, Junkernhees in Mittelhees, v mestu Siegen kraji Sohlbach, Dillnhütten, Geisweid, Birlenbach, Trupbach, Seelbach, Achenbach, Lindenberg, Rosterberg, Rödgen, Obersdorf, Eisern in Eiserfeld, občine Freudenberg, Neunkirchen in Burbach, v občini Wilnsdorf kraja Rinsdorf in Wilden.