natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
That plate and those markings must be affixed by the manufacturer or his authorised representative.
To tablico in oznake mora pritrditi proizvajalec ali njegov pooblaščeni zastopnik.
MANUFACTURER’S DATA PLATE
TABLICA PROIZVAJALCA
A manufacturer’s data plate, an example of which is shown in Appendix 1, must be firmly attached, at an easily accessible point, to a part which is normally not likely to be replaced during use; it must be easily legible and contain the following information in an indelible form, in the following order:
Tablica proizvajalca, katere primer je prikazan v dodatku 1, mora biti trdno pritrjena na lahko dostopnem mestu na delu, ki ga med normalno uporabo vozila ni treba menjati; tablica mora biti dobro čitljiva in mora vsebovati naslednje neizbrisno vpisane podatke, ki si morajo slediti v naslednjem vrstnem redu:
name of manufacturer;
ime proizvajalca;
type-approval mark as described in Article 8 of Directive 2002/24/EC;
oznaka homologacije skladno s členom 8 Direktive 2002/24/ES;
the vehicle identification number (VIN);
identifikacijska številka vozila (VIN);
the stationary sound level: … dB(A) … rev/min.
nivo hrupa mirujočega vozila: … dB(A) … vrt/min.
The type-approval mark as required by point 2.1.2, the stationary sound level value and the number of rev/minute as required by point 2.1.4 are not included in the EC component type-approval of statutory markings.
Oznaka homologacije skladno s točko 2.1.2, raven hrupa mirujočega vozila in vrtilna frekvenca skladno s točko 2.1.4 niso vključene v ES homologacijo sestavnega dela predpisanih oznak.
However, those pieces of information must be attached to all vehicles manufactured in conformity with the type that has been approved.
Vendar morajo biti ti podatki pritrjeni na vseh vozilih, izdelanih skladno s tipom vozila, ki mu je bila podeljena homologacija.
Manufacturers may affix additional information below or to one side of the mandatory markings, outside a clearly marked rectangle which contains only the information required by points 2.1.1 to 2.1.4 (see Appendix 1).
Proizvajalec lahko poleg obveznih oznak ali pod njimi pritrdi dodatne podatke, in to zunaj jasno označenega pravokotnika, ki vsebuje samo podatke, navedene v točkah 2.1.1 do 2.1.4 (glej dodatek 1).
VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
IDENTIFIKACIJSKA ŠTEVILKA VOZILA
The vehicle identification number consists of a structured combination of characters assigned to each vehicle by their manufacturer.
Identifikacijska številka vozila vsebuje razčlenjeno kombinacijo znakov, ki jih določi proizvajalec za vsako vozilo.
Its purpose is to enable any vehicle to be identified unambiguously via its manufacturer — without any need for any other information — for a period of 30 years.
Oznaka naj bi 30 let omogočala nedvoumno identifikacijo vsakega vozila prek njegovega proizvajalca, ne da bi bili potrebni dodatni podatki.
The identification must meet the following requirements:
Identifikacijska številka mora izpolnjevati naslednje zahteve:
the vehicle identification number must be entered on the manufacturer’s data plate.
identifikacijska številka vozila mora biti označena na tablici proizvajalca.
It must also be hammered or punched in such a way as to avoid obliteration or change on the chassis or frame at a point such that it can easily be accessible, and it must be situated on the right half of the vehicle;
Številka mora biti vkovana ali vtisnjena, tako da je ni mogoče zabrisati ali spremeniti, na šasijo ali okvir na lahko dostopnem mestu, in sicer na desni polovici vozila;
the vehicle identification number must be in three parts as indicated hereafter:
identifikacijska številka vozila mora biti sestavljena iz treh delov:
the first part consists of a code assigned to the vehicle manufacturer enabling that person to be identified.
prvi del sestoji iz kode, ki je dodeljena proizvajalcu vozila za njegovo identifikacijo.
The code shall consist of three characters (letters or digits) issued by the competent authorities in the country in which the manufacturer has his registered address in line with the practice of the international agency acting on the authorisation of the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO).
Ta koda sestoji iz treh znakov (črk ali številk), ki jih podelijo pristojni organi v državi, v kateri ima proizvajalec sedež firme, skladno s postopkom mednarodne agencije, ki zastopa Mednarodno organizacijo za standardizacijo (ISO).
The first character designates a geographical area, the second a country within a geographical area and the third character a particular manufacturer.
Prvi znak označuje geografsko območje, drugi znak državo znotraj geografskega območja, tretji znak pa določenega proizvajalca.
Where the manufacturer produces fewer than 500 vehicles per year the third character is always a 9.
Če proizvajalec izdela manj kakor 500 vozil na leto, je tretji znak vedno 9.
In order to identify that manufacturer the authority referred to above shall also issue the third, fourth and fifth characters of the third part;
Zaradi identifikacije tega proizvajalca podeli zgoraj omenjeni organ tudi tretji, četrti in peti znak tretjega dela;
the second part consists of six characters (letters or digits) for the purpose of describing the general characteristics of the vehicle (type, variant, and in the case of mopeds, version); each characteristic may be represented by several characters.
drugi del sestoji iz šestih znakov (črk ali številk), ki označujejo splošne značilnosti vozila (tip, različico in pri mopedih izvedenko); vsako od teh značilnosti lahko predstavlja več znakov.
If its manufacturer does not use one or more of those characters the unused spaces must be filled by alphabetical or numerical characters, the choice being left to the manufacturer;
Če proizvajalec ne uporablja enega ali več od teh znakov, v te prostore vpiše črke ali številke po svoji izbiri;
the third part consists of eight characters, the last four of which are required to be numerical and, in combination with the two other parts, must enable a particular vehicle to be clearly identified.
tretji del sestoji iz osmih znakov, od katerih morajo biti zadnji štirje številke, ki morajo skupaj z drugima dvema deloma zagotavljati jasno identifikacijo določenega vozila.
Any unused position must be filled by a 0 in order to obtain the requisite total number of characters;
Vsi prazni prostori morajo biti zapolnjeni z ničlo, da se dobi predpisano skupno število znakov;
the vehicle identification number must, wherever possible, occupy a single line.
povsod, kjer je to mogoče, mora biti identifikacijska številka vozila napisana v eni vrstici.
The beginning and end of this line must be marked by a symbol which is neither an Arabic numeral nor a capital Latin letter, nor must it be possible to confuse this with any such character.
Začetek in konec te vrstice morata biti označena s simbolom, ki ni niti arabska številka niti latinska velika črka in ga z le-temi ni mogoče zamenjati.
By way of exception and for technical reasons it may also occupy two lines.
Izjemoma se zaradi tehničnih razlogov identifikacijska številka vozila lahko napiše v dveh vrsticah.
However, in this case there must be no breaks within any of the three parts and the beginning and end of each line must be marked by a symbol which is neither an Arabic numeral nor a capital Latin letter, nor must it be possible to confuse this with any such character.
V tem primeru znotraj katerega koli izmed treh delov ne sme biti prekinitev, začetek in konec vsake vrstice pa morata biti označena s simbolom, ki ni niti arabska številka niti latinska velika črka in ga z le-temi ni mogoče zamenjati.
The introduction of said symbol within a line between the three parts (point 3.1.1) is also authorised.
Dovoljeno je vstavljanje omenjenega simbola med tremi deli v eni vrstici (točka 3.1.1).
There must be no spaces between the characters.
Med znaki ne sme biti presledkov.
CHARACTERS
ZNAKI
Latin letters and Arabic numerals must be used for all of the markings provided for in points 2 and 3.
Za vse podatke, predvidene v točkah 2 in 3, je treba uporabljati latinske črke in arabske številke.
However, the Latin letters used for the information provided for in points 2.1.1, 2.1.3 and 3 must be capital letters.
Vendar je treba v podatkih, predvidenih v točkah 2.1.1, 2.1.3 in 3, uporabiti velike tiskane latinske črke.
In the vehicle identification number:
Za identifikacijsko številko vozila:
letters I, O and Q, or dashes, asterisks or other specific signs are prohibited;
ni dovoljena uporaba črk I, O in Q ali pomišljajev, zvezdic in drugih posebnih znakov;
letters and figures shall have the following minimum heights:
najmanjša višina črk in številk mora biti:
4 mm in the case of characters entered directly on the chassis or frame or any other similar vehicle structure;
4 mm za znake, ki so neposredno na šasiji ali okvirju ali na nekem drugem podobnem delu vozila;
3 mm in the case of characters entered on the manufacturer’s data plate.
3 mm za znake na tablici proizvajalca.
Council Directive 93/34/EEC
Direktiva Sveta 93/34/EGS
(OJ L 188, 29.7.1993, p. 38)
(UL L 188, 29.7.1993, str. 38).
Commission Directive 1999/25/EC
Direktiva Komisije 1999/25/ES
(OJ L 104, 21.4.1999, p. 19)
(UL L 104, 21.4.1999, str. 19).
(OJ L 66, 8.3.2006, p. 7)
(UL L 66, 8.3.2006, str. 7).
Article 2 and Annex II only
Samo člen 2 in Priloga II
93/34/EEC
93/34/EGS
14 June 1995
14. junij 1995
1 January 2000 [1]
1. januar 2000 [1]
In conformity with Article 2 of Directive 1999/25/EC:‘1. With effect from 1 January 2000, Member States shall not, on grounds relating to statutory markings:refuse, in respect of a type of two- or three-wheel vehicle, to grant EC type-approval,prohibit the registration, sale or entry into service of two- or three-wheel motor vehicles,if the statutory markings comply with the requirements of Council Directive 93/34/EEC as amended by this Directive.2. With effect from 1 July 2000, Member States shall refuse to grant EC type-approval for any type of two- or three-wheel motor vehicle on grounds relating to the statutory markings if the requirements of Directive 93/34/EEC, as amended by this Directive, are not fulfilled.’
V skladu s členom 2 Direktive 1999/25/ES:„1. Države članice po 1. januarju 2000 ne smejo zaradi razlogov, ki se nanašajo na predpisane oznake:zavrniti podelitve ES-homologacije za določen tip dvo- oziroma trikolesnega vozila,prepovedati registracije, prodaje ali začetka uporabe dvo- oziroma trikolesnih motornih vozil,če so predpisane oznake skladne z zahtevami Direktive Sveta 93/34/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena s to direktivo.2. Države članice po 1. juliju 2000 zavrnejo podelitev ES-homologacije za določen tip dvo- oziroma trikolesnega motornega vozila zaradi razlogov, ki se nanašajo na predpisane oznake, če niso izpolnjene zahteve Direktive 93/34/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena s to direktivo.“
In conformity with Article 5 of Directive 2006/27/EC:‘1. With effect from 1 January 2007, with respect to two- or three-wheel vehicles which comply with the provisions laid down in Directives […], 93/34/EEC, […] respectively, as amended by this Directive, Member States shall not, on grounds relating to the subject matter of the Directive concerned, refuse to grant EC type-approval or prohibit the registration, sale or entry into service of such a vehicle.2. With effect from 1 July 2007, Member States shall refuse, on grounds relating to the subject matter of the Directive concerned, to grant EC type-approval to any new type of two- or three-wheel motor vehicle which does not comply with the provisions laid down in Directives […], 93/34/EEC, […] respectively, as amended by this Directive.’
V skladu s členom 5 Direktive 2006/27/ES:„1. Od 1. januarja 2007 države članice zaradi razlogov, povezanih z vsebino zadevne direktive, ne smejo zavrniti podelitve ES-homologacije ali prepovedati registracije, prodaje ali začetka uporabe dvo- ali trikolesnih vozil, ki izpolnjujejo določbe direktiv […], 93/34/EGS, […] kakor so bile spremenjene s to direktivo.2. Od 1. julija 2007 države članice zaradi razlogov, povezanih z vsebino zadevne direktive, zavrnejo podelitev ES-homologacije vsakemu novemu tipu dvo- ali trikolesnih motornih vozil, ki ne izpolnjuje določb direktiv […], 93/34/EGS, […], kakor so bile spremenjene s to direktivo.“.
Directive 93/34/EEC
Direktiva 93/34/EGS
Directive 2006/27/EC
Direktiva 2006/27/ES
Articles 1, 2 and 3
Člen 1, 2 in 3
Directive 2009/140/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2009/140/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services
o spremembi direktiv 2002/21/ES o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve, 2002/19/ES o dostopu do elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in pripadajočih naprav ter o njihovem medomrežnem povezovanju in 2002/20/ES o odobritvi elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev
Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty, in the light of the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee on 13 November 2009 [3],
v skladu s postopkom, določenim v členu 251 Pogodbe, glede na skupno besedilo, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor dne 13. novembra 2009 [3],
The functioning of the five directives comprising the existing EU regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive) [4], Directive 2002/19/EC (Access Directive) [5], Directive 2002/20/EC (Authorisation Directive) [6], Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive) [7], and Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) [8] (together referred to as ‘the Framework Directive and the Specific Directives) is subject to periodic review by the Commission, with a view in particular to determining the need for modification in the light of technological and market developments.
Komisija redno pregleduje delovanje petih direktiv, ki sestavljajo obstoječi regulativni okvir za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve (Direktiva 2002/21/ES (Okvirna direktiva) [4], Direktiva 2002/19/ES (Direktiva o dostopu) [5], Direktiva 2002/20/ES (Direktiva o odobritvi) [6], Direktiva 2002/22/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o univerzalni storitvi in pravicah uporabnikov v zvezi z elektronskimi komunikacijskimi omrežji in storitvami (Direktiva o univerzalnih storitvah) [7] in Direktiva 2002/58/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. julija 2002 o obdelavi osebnih podatkov in varstvu zasebnosti na področju elektronskih komunikacij (Direktiva o zasebnosti in elektronskih komunikacijah) [8] (skupaj „Okvirna direktiva in posebne direktive“)), da bi zlasti ugotovila, ali jih je treba glede na razvoj tehnologije in trga spremeniti.
In that regard, the Commission presented its initial findings in its Communication of 29 June 2006 on the review of the EU regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services.
V zvezi s tem je Komisija predstavila svoje prve ugotovitve v Sporočilu z dne 29. junija 2006 o pregledu regulativnega okvira EU za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve.
On the basis of these initial findings, a public consultation was held, which identified the continued lack of an internal market for electronic communications as the most important aspect needing to be addressed.
Na podlagi teh prvih ugotovitev je bilo organizirano javno posvetovanje, v okviru katerega je bilo opredeljeno, da je najpomembnejši vidik, ki ga je treba obravnavati, vzpostavitev še vedno nedelujočega notranjega trga za elektronske komunikacije.
In particular, regulatory fragmentation and inconsistencies between the activities of the national regulatory authorities were found to jeopardise not only the competitiveness of the sector, but also the substantial consumer benefits from cross-border competition.
Zlasti regulativna razdrobljenost in neskladja med dejavnostmi nacionalnih regulativnih organov so tisti dejavniki, ki ogrožajo konkurenčnost sektorja in znatne koristi, ki jih imajo potrošniki od čezmejne konkurence.
The EU regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services should therefore be reformed in order to complete the internal market for electronic communications by strengthening the Community mechanism for regulating operators with significant market power in the key markets.
Regulativni okvir EU za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve bi bilo treba zato preoblikovati, da bi se dokončno vzpostavil notranji trg za elektronske komunikacije, in sicer z okrepitvijo mehanizma Skupnosti za regulacijo obratovalcev s pomembno tržno močjo na ključnih trgih.
This is complemented by Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 establishing the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) and the Office [9].
To dopolnjuje Uredba (ES) št. 1211/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2009 o ustanovitvi Organa evropskih regulatorjev za elektronske komunikacije (BEREC) in Urada [9].
The reform also includes the definition of an efficient and coordinated spectrum management strategy in order to achieve a single European information space and the reinforcement of provisions for users with disabilities in order to obtain an inclusive information society.
Reforma vključuje tudi opredelitev učinkovite in usklajene strategije upravljanja spektra, da se vzpostavi enotni evropski informacijski prostor in izboljšajo določbe za uporabnike invalide ter tako doseže vključujoča informacijska družba.
Recognising that the Internet is essential for education and for the practical exercise of freedom of expression and access to information, any restriction imposed on the exercise of these fundamental rights should be in accordance with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
Upoštevajoč dejstvo, da je internet nujen za izobraževanje in dejansko uresničevanje svobode izražanja in dostopa do informacij, bi moralo biti kakršno koli omejevanje teh temeljnih pravic v skladu z Evropsko konvencijo o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin.
Concerning these issues, the Commission should undertake a wide public consultation.
Komisija bi morala o tem sprožiti široko javno razpravo.
The aim is progressively to reduce ex-ante sector specific rules as competition in the markets develops and, ultimately, for electronic communications to be governed by competition law only.
Cilj je, da bi ob razvoju konkurence na trgu postopno odpravili ex ante pravila, specifična za ta sektor, tako da bi elektronske komunikacije nazadnje urejalo le konkurenčno pravo.
Considering that the markets for electronic communications have shown strong competitive dynamics in recent years, it is essential that ex-ante regulatory obligations only be imposed where there is no effective and sustainable competition.
Zaradi močne konkurenčne dinamike na trgih elektronskih komunikacij v zadnjih letih je nujno zagotoviti, da se ex ante regulativne obveznosti naložijo le, če ni učinkovite in trajnostne konkurence.
In carrying out its reviews of the functioning of the Framework Directive and the Specific Directives, the Commission should assess whether, in the light of developments in the market and with regard to both competition and consumer protection, there is a continued need for the provisions on sector specific ex-ante regulation laid down in Articles 8 to 13a of Directive 2002/19/EC (Access Directive) and Article 17 of Directive 2002/22/EC (Universal Service Directive) or whether those provisions should be amended or repealed.
Pri pregledu delovanja Okvirne direktive in posebnih direktiv bi Komisija morala oceniti, ali so ob upoštevanju razvoja trga in glede na konkurenco in varstvo potrošnikov še potrebne določbe o ex ante urejanju, specifičnem za ta sektor iz členov 8 do 13a Direktive 2002/19/ES (Direktiva o dostopu) ter člena 17 Direktive 2002/22/ES (Direktiva o univerzalnih storitvah), ali pa bi bilo navedene določbe treba spremeniti ali razveljaviti.
In order to ensure a proportionate and adaptable approach to varying competitive conditions, national regulatory authorities should be able to define markets on a sub-national basis and to lift regulatory obligations in markets and/or geographic areas where there is effective infrastructure competition.
Da bi se lahko na spreminjajoče se konkurenčne razmere odzivali sorazmerno in prilagojeno, bi bilo treba nacionalnim regulativnim organom omogočiti, da opredelijo trge na podnacionalni ravni in/ali odpravijo regulativne obveznosti na trgih in/ali geografskih območjih, na katerih obstaja učinkovita infrastrukturna konkurenca.
In order to achieve the goals of the Lisbon Agenda, it is necessary to give appropriate incentives for investment in new high-speed networks that will support innovation in content-rich Internet services and strengthen the international competitiveness of the European Union.
Za doseganje ciljev lizbonske agende je treba zagotoviti ustrezne spodbude za naložbe v nova visokohitrostna omrežja, ki bodo podpirale inovacije v internetnih storitvah z bogato vsebino in okrepile mednarodno konkurenčnost Evropske unije.
Such networks have enormous potential to deliver benefits to consumers and businesses across the European Union.
Taka omrežja lahko zelo koristijo potrošnikom in podjetjem v celotni Evropski uniji.
It is therefore vital to promote sustainable investment in the development of these new networks, while safeguarding competition and boosting consumer choice through regulatory predictability and consistency.
Zato je bistveno spodbujati trajne naložbe v razvoj teh novih omrežij, pri tem pa je treba zagotoviti regulativno predvidljivost in skladnost ter tako varovati konkurenco in povečevati možnost izbire za potrošnike.
In its Communication of 20 March 2006 entitled ‘Bridging the Broadband Gap’, the Commission acknowledged that there is a territorial divide in the European Union regarding access to high-speed broadband services.
Komisija v svojem sporočilu z dne 20. marca 2006 z naslovom „Premoščanje širokopasovne vrzeli“ ugotavlja, da v Evropski uniji obstaja ozemeljska vrzel pri dostopu do visokohitrostnih širokopasovnih storitev.
Easier access to radio spectrum facilitates the development of high-speed broadband services in remote regions.
Lažji dostop do radijskega spektra olajša razvoj visokohitrostnih širokopasovnih storitev v oddaljenih regijah.
Despite the general increase in broadband connectivity, access in various regions is limited on account of high costs resulting from low population densities and remoteness.
Kljub splošnemu povečanju števila širokopasovnih priključkov je dostop v različnih regijah omejen zaradi visokih stroškov, ki so posledica nizke gostote prebivalstva in oddaljenosti.
In order to ensure investment in new technologies in underdeveloped regions, electronic communications regulation should be consistent with other policies, such as State aid policy, cohesion policy or the aims of wider industrial policy.
Za zagotovitev naložb v nove tehnologije v manj razvitih regijah bi moralo biti urejanje na področju elektronskih komunikacij v skladu z drugimi politikami, kot so politika državne pomoči, kohezijska politika ali cilji širše industrijske politike.
Public investment in networks should be made in accordance with the principle of non-discrimination.
Javne naložbe v omrežja bi morale biti izvedene v skladu z načelom nediskriminacije.
To this end, public support should be given by means of open, transparent and competitive procedures.
Zato bi bilo treba javna sredstva dodeljevati v okviru odprtih, preglednih in konkurenčnih postopkov.