natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This report shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiaries.
V tem poročilu navede tudi podrobne informacije o zneskih pomoči in obrestih vračila, ki so jih prejemniki že vrnili.
OJ C 233, 22.9.2005, p. 21.
UL C 233, 22.9.2005, str. 21.
Notably the law of 6 October 1982 and the law No 2001-6 of 4 January 2001.
Zlasti z zakonom z dne 6. oktobra 1982, nato z zakonom št. 2001-6 z dne 4. januarja 2001.
Law No 99-574 of 9 July 1999, Article 59 III, IV (French Official Journal of 10.7.1999).
Zakon št. 99-574 z dne 9. julija 1999, člen 59 III, IV (JORF, 10.7.1999).
Decree No 90-879 of 28 September 1990, Article 4 (French Official Journal of 30.9.1990).
Odlok št. 90-879 z dne 28. septembra 1990, člen 4 (JORF, 30.9.1990).
Minutes of the Fruit and Vegetables meeting of 11 April 2001, notes from the Ministry of Agriculture, Annex No 19.
Zapisnik sestanka Fruits et Légumes z dne 11. aprila 2001, besede ministra za kmetijstvo, priloga št. 19.
Minutes of the General Assembly of the Fisheries OP of 31 August 2000 in Nimes, Annex No 20.
Zapisnik generalne skupščine organizacije proizvajalcev breskev z dne 31. avgusta 2000 v Nîmesu, priloga št. 20.
This table takes account of the correction sent by the French authorities by letter of 28 December 2005.
V tej razpredelnici je upoštevan popravek, ki so ga francoski organi poslali z dopisom z dne 28. decembra 2005.
OJ L 118, 20.5.1972, p. 1.
UL L 118, 20.5.1972, str. 1.
Judgment of the Court of 21 March 1991, Italy v Commission (Case C-303/88, ECR 1991, p. I-1433), paragraph 57.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 21. marca 1991 v zadevi Italija proti Komisiji (C-303/88, Recueil, str. I-1433, točka 57).
Judgment of the Court of 17 September 1980, Philip Morris/Commission, (Case 730/79, ECR 1980, p. 2671), paragraphs 11 and 12.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 17. septembra 1980 v zadevi Philip Morris proti Komisiji (730/79, Recueil, str. 2671, točki 11 in 12).
For example, in 2000 intra-Community trade in vegetables amounted to 6727000 tonnes and trade in fruit to 5609000 tonnes.
Na primer, leta 2000 je trgovina z zelenjavo v Skupnosti obsegala 6727000 ton, trgovina s sadjem pa 5609000 ton.
France has always been one of the EU’s biggest producers of fruit and vegetables, producing 3681000 tonnes of fruit and 7989000 tonnes of vegetables in 2000.
Francija je bila vedno med najpomembnejšimi državami proizvajalkami sadja in zelenjave v EU, pri čemer je leta 2000 proizvedla 3681000 ton sadja in 7989000 ton zelenjave.
Judgment of the Court of 21 March 1990, Belgium v Commission (Cases C-142/87, ECR 1987, p. 2589), paragraph 35, ECR 1987, p. 2589.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 21. marca 1990 v zadevi Belgija proti Komisiji (C-142/87, Recueil, str. 2589, točka 35).
Judgment of the Court of 21 March 1991, Italy v Commission (C-303/88, ECR I-1433), paragraph 11.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 21. marca 1991 v zadevi Italija proti Komisiji (C-303/88, Recueil, str. I-1433, točka 11).
Judgment of the Court of 16 May 2002, France v Commission (C-482/99, ECR 2002, p. I-4397), paragraph 24.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 16. maja 2002 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji (C-482/99, Recueil, str. I-4397, točka 24).
Judgment of the Court of 20 November 2003, GEMO (C-126/01, ECR 2003, p. I-13769), paragraph 24.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 20. novembra 2003 v zadevi GEMO (C-126/01, Recueil, str. I-13769, točka 24).
Judgment of the Court of 22 March 1977, Steinike & Weinlig (78/76, ECR 1977, p. 595) and judgment of the Court of 11 November 1987 (259/85, France/Commission, ECR 1987, p. 4393), paragraph 23.
Sodbi Sodišča z dne 22. marca 1977 v zadevi Steinike & Weinlig (78/76, Recueil, str. 595) in z dne 11. novembra 1987 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji (259/85, Recueil, str. 4393, točka 23).
The disputed measure was a publicity campaign for the optical sector, financed entirely by a ‘compulsory contribution’ levied on the companies in the sector.
Sporni ukrep je bila oglaševalska akcija v korist sektorja optike, ki se je v celoti financirala iz „obveznega namenskega prispevka“ podjetij v sektorju.
Judgment of the Court of 20 September 2007, Salvat Père & Fils e.a./Commission (T-136/05, ECR p. II-4063).
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 20. septembra 2007 v zadevi Salvat Père & Fils in drugi proti Komisiji (T-136/05, ZOdl., str. II-4063).
See judgment of the Court of 8 June 1995, Siemens v Commission (Case T-459/93, ECR II-1675), paragraphs 48 and 77.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 8. junija 1995 v zadevi Siemens proti Komisiji (T-459/93, Recueil, str. II-1675, točki 48 in 77).
See, for example, the judgment of the Court of 29 November 1978, Redmond (known as the ‘Pigs Marketing Board’ judgment) (83/78, ECR 1978, p. 2347), paragraph 60.
Glej na primer sodbo Sodišča z dne 29. novembra 1978 v zadevi Redmond (imenovana sodba „Pigs Marketing Board“) (83/78, Recueil, str. 2347, točka 60).
Judgment of the Court of 26 May 2005, Kuipers (C-283/03, ECR 2005, p. I-3761), paragraphs 42, 49 and 53.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 26. maja 2005 v zadevi Kuipers (C-283/03, ZOdl., str. I-3761, točke 42, 49 in 53).
Judgment of 27 October 2007, France v Commission (Case C-441/06, not yet reported), paragraph 29.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 27. oktobra 2007 v zadevi Komisija proti Franciji (C-441/06, ZOdl., str. I-8887, točka 29).
France requested an extension of the deadline for replying, by letter dated 5 August 2005, received on 9 August 2005.
Francija je z dopisom z dne 5. avgusta 2005, evidentiranim 9. avgusta 2005, zaprosila za dodatno podaljšanje roka za odgovor.
France submitted its comments by letter dated 4 October 2005, received on 6 October 2005.
Svoje pripombe pa je poslala z dopisom z dne 4. oktobra 2005, evidentiranim 6. oktobra 2005.
These comments were forwarded to the French authorities by letter dated 1 December 2005.
Te pripombe so bile francoskim organom poslane z dopisom z dne 1. decembra 2005.
The French authorities replied by letter dated 28 December 2005, in which they gave their permission for the letters dated 26 December 2002 and 22 July 2003 to be forwarded to FEDECOM.
Francoski organi so odgovorili z dopisom z dne 28. decembra 2005, v katerem so soglašali s posredovanjem dopisov z dne 26. decembra 2002 in 22. julija 2003 združenju FEDECOM.
According to the complainants, these provisions were introduced before the 1996 reform of the CMO in fruit and vegetables.
Po navedbah pritožnikov so bili ti mehanizmi uvedeni pred reformo skupne ureditve trga za sadje in zelenjavo leta 1996.
France has assured us that no further measures have been financed under these provisions since 1 January 2003.
Francija je zagotovila, da se od 1. januarja 2003 na podlagi teh mehanizmov ni več financiral noben ukrep.
The following table gives an overview of the amounts paid, in euro, by ONIFLHOR under the ‘contingency plans’ from 1992 to 2002 [8].
V spodnji razpredelnici so v eurih povzeti zneski, ki jih je ONIFLHOR plačal na podlagi „načrtov ukrepov ob nepredvidljivih dogodkih“ od leta 1992 do leta 2002 [8].
These sums are broken down by year and by measure.
Ti zneski so razčlenjeni po letih in po ukrepih.
There was no text that obliged the producer organisations to ask to benefit from Community aid.
Nobeno besedilo organizacij proizvajalcev ni obvezovalo, da zaprosijo za koriščenje pomoči Skupnosti.
Consequently, according to FEDECOM, the sectoral contributions cannot be considered as constituting State resources, given their private and voluntary nature.
Zato po mnenju združenja FEDECOM za stanovske deleže ni mogoče šteti, da pomenijo državna sredstva, saj so bili zasebni in prostovoljni.
In the case in question, the prescription period was interrupted by a letter from the Commission to France on 31 July 2002.
V obravnavanem primeru je bil zastaralni rok prekinjen z dopisom Komisije Franciji z dne 31. julija 2002.
Consequently, the period preceding 31 July 1992 may not be taken into account by the Commission.
Komisija zato ni upoštevala obdobja pred 31. julijem 1992.
This charge was imposed by a trade association governed by public law.
Ta prispevek je naložila javnopravna poklicna organizacija.
This association never had the power to freely dispose of contributions gathered in this manner.
Ta organizacija ni mogla v nobenem trenutku prosto razpolagati s tako zbranimi prispevki.
Judgment of the Court of 15 July 2004, Pearle e.a. (Case C-345/02, ECR 2004, p. I-7139).
Sodba Sodišča z dne 15. julija 2004 v zadevi Pearle in drugi (C-345/02, ZOdl., str. I-7139).
Decision No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Odločba št. 406/2009/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Community’s greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020
o prizadevanju držav članic za zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov, da do leta 2020 izpolnijo zavezo Skupnosti za zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov
The ultimate objective of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which was approved on behalf of the European Community by Council Decision 94/69/EC [3], is to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.
Temeljni cilj Okvirne konvencije Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja (UNFCCC), ki je bila v imenu Evropske skupnosti odobrena s Sklepom Sveta 94/69/ES [3], je doseči ustalitev koncentracije toplogrednih plinov v ozračju na ravni, ki bo preprečila nevarno antropogeno poseganje v podnebni sistem.
Furthermore, in order to meet this objective, the European Council of March 2007 endorsed a Community objective of a 30 % reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 compared to 1990 as its contribution to a global and comprehensive agreement for the period after 2012, provided that other developed countries commit themselves to comparable emission reductions and economically more advanced developing countries commit themselves to contributing adequately according to their responsibilities and capabilities.
Poleg tega je, z namenom izpolnitve tega cilja, Evropski svet na zasedanju marca 2007 kot svoj prispevek h globalnemu in celovitemu sporazumu za obdobje po letu 2012 potrdil cilj Skupnosti, da se bodo do leta 2020 emisije toplogrednih plinov zmanjšale za 30 % v primerjavi z letom 1990, pod pogojem, da se druge razvite države zavežejo k primerljivemu zmanjšanju emisij ter da je prispevek gospodarsko naprednejših držav v razvoju sorazmeren z njihovimi odgovornostmi in zmogljivostmi.
The European Council of March 2007 emphasised that the Community is committed to transforming Europe into a highly energy-efficient and low greenhouse-gas-emitting economy and has decided that, until a global and comprehensive agreement for the period after 2012 is concluded, and without prejudice to its position in international negotiations, the Community makes a firm independent commitment to achieve at least a 20 % reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 compared to 1990.
Evropski svet je na zasedanju marca 2007 poudaril, da je Skupnost zavezana k preoblikovanju Evrope v energetsko visoko učinkovito gospodarstvo z nizkimi emisijami toplogrednih plinov, in se je odločil, da Skupnost do sklenitve globalnega in celovitega sporazuma za obdobje po letu 2012 in ne glede na njeno stališče v mednarodnih pogajanjih odločno sprejema neodvisno zavezo, v skladu s katero bo do leta 2020 doseženo vsaj 20 % zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov v primerjavi z letom 1990.
Energy efficiency improvements are a crucial element for Member States to meet the requirements under this Decision.
Države članice morajo nujno izboljšati energetsko učinkovitost, če želijo uresničiti zahteve te odločbe.
In this context, the Commission should closely monitor progress towards the objective to reduce energy consumption by 20 % by 2020, and propose additional actions if progress is insufficient.
V tem okviru bi morala Komisija skrbno nadzorovati napredek pri doseganju cilja o zmanjšanju porabe energije za 20 % do leta 2020 ter predlagati dodatne ukrepe, če napredek ni zadosten.
Directive 2003/87/EC [4] establishes a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community, which covers certain sectors of the economy.
Direktiva 2003/87/ES [4] vzpostavlja sistem za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov v Skupnosti, ki vključuje nekatere gospodarske sektorje.
All sectors of the economy should contribute to emission reductions in order to cost-effectively achieve the objective of a 20 % reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 compared to 1990 levels.. Member States should therefore implement additional policies and measures in an effort to further limit the greenhouse gas emissions from sources not covered under Directive 2003/87/EC.
Da se na stroškovno učinkovit način doseže cilj, da se do leta 2020 doseže 20 % zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov v primerjavi z letom 1990, bi morali k zmanjšanju emisij prispevati vsi gospodarski sektorji. Zato bi morale države članice izvajati dodatne politike in ukrepe v prizadevanju za dodatno zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov iz virov, ki niso vključeni v Direktivo 2003/87/ES.
Member States’ reduction efforts should be based on the principle of solidarity between Member States and the need for sustainable economic growth across the Community, taking into account the relative per capita GDP of Member States.
Prizadevanje držav članic za zmanjšanje emisij bi moralo temeljiti na načelu solidarnosti med državami članicami in potrebi po trajnostni gospodarski rasti v Skupnosti, ob upoštevanju relativnega BDP na prebivalca v državah članicah.
Member States that currently have a relatively low per capita GDP, and thus high GDP growth expectations, should be allowed to increase their greenhouse gas emissions compared to 2005, but should limit this greenhouse gas emissions growth to contribute to the independent reduction commitment of the Community.
Državam članicam, ki imajo zdaj relativno nizek BDP na prebivalca in zato višja pričakovanja v zvezi z rastjo BDP, bi moralo biti dovoljeno, da povečajo emisije toplogrednih plinov v primerjavi z letom 2005, vendar bi morale rast teh emisij toplogrednih plinov omejiti, da bi prispevale k neodvisni zavezi Skupnosti za zmanjšanje emisij.
Member States that currently have a relatively high per capita GDP should reduce their greenhouse gas emissions compared to 2005.
Države članice, ki imajo zdaj relativno visok BDP na prebivalca, bi morale zmanjšati emisije toplogrednih plinov v primerjavi z letom 2005.
As a means to even out the differences in abatement costs faced by different Member States, by allowing for increased geographical flexibility, and at the same time, as a means to enhance the overall cost-effectiveness of the total commitment of the Community, Member States should be able to transfer part of their annual emission allocation to other Member States.
Za izravnavo razlik pri stroških zmanjšanja emisij, s katerimi se ob upoštevanju povečane geografske prilagodljivosti soočajo različne države članice, in hkrati za krepitev skupne stroškovne učinkovitosti celotne obveznosti Skupnosti, bi bilo treba državam članicam omogočiti prenos dela pravic do dodeljenih letnih emisij na drugo državo članico.
The transparency of such transfers should be ensured by way of a notification to the Commission and the registration of each transfer in the registries of both Member States involved.
Preglednost teh prenosov bi se morala zagotoviti z obvestilom Komisiji ter z zabeležbo vsakega prenosa v registre obeh zainteresiranih držav članic.
Such transfers may be carried out in a manner that is mutually convenient, including by means of auctioning, the use of market intermediaries acting on an agency basis, or by way of bilateral arrangements.
Te prenose se lahko opravi na način, ki bo zadovoljiv za obe strani, naj bo to z dražbo, uporabo tržnih posrednikov, ki delujejo v okviru neke agencije, ali z dvostranskimi dogovori.
Significant greenhouse gas emission reductions should be made within the Union.
V Evropski uniji bi bilo treba znatno zmanjšati emisije toplogrednih plinov.
The use of credits from project activities should be limited so that it is supplemental to domestic action.
Treba bi bilo omejiti uporabo dobropisov iz projektnih dejavnosti, tako da dopolnjuje domačo dejavnost.
The Union remains committed to the continued improvement of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and will seek improvements through the appropriate international processes.
Evropska unija ostaja zavezana nadaljnjemu izboljšanju mehanizma čistega razvoja (CDM) ter bo poskušala doseči izboljšanje z ustreznimi mednarodnimi postopki.
It is important that credits from project activities used by Member States represent real, verifiable, additional and permanent emission reductions and have clear sustainable development benefits and no significant negative environmental or social impacts.
Pomembno je, da države članice uporabljajo dobropise iz projektnih dejavnosti, ki omogočajo resnično, preverljivo, dodatno in stalno zmanjšanje emisij, ter jasno koristijo trajnostnemu razvoju in nimajo večjih negativnih okoljskih ali družbenih posledic.
Member States should also report on the qualitative criteria they apply for the use of such credits.
Države članice bi morale poročati tudi o kakovostnih merilih, ki jih upoštevajo pri uporabi takšnih dobropisov.
In order to provide for flexibility for Member States in implementing their commitments, to promote sustainable development in third countries, in particular in developing countries, and to provide certainty to investors, the Community should continue to recognise a certain amount of credits from greenhouse gas emission reduction projects in third countries before a future international agreement on climate change (hereinafter referred to as the international agreement on climate change) has been reached.
Za zagotavljanje prilagodljivosti držav članic pri izvajanju njihovih zavez, spodbujanje trajnostnega razvoja v tretjih državah, zlasti v državah v razvoju, in zagotavljanje zanesljivosti za vlagatelje bi morala Skupnost še naprej priznavati določeno količino dobropisov iz projektov za zmanjševanje emisij toplogrednih plinov v tretjih državah pred sklenitvijo prihodnjega mednarodnega sporazuma o podnebnih spremembah (v nadaljevanju „mednarodni sporazum o podnebnih spremembah“).
Member States should ensure that their policies for purchasing these credits enhance the equitable geographical distribution of projects, in particular by increasing the share of cCertified emission reductions (CERs) purchased from least developed countries (LDCs) and small island developing States (SIDS), and enhance the achievement of an international agreement on climate change.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da njihove politike za nakup teh dobropisov spodbujajo pravično geografsko razdelitev projektov, zlasti s povečanjem deleža potrjenih zmanjšanj emisij (CER), kupljenih od najmanj razvitih držav (LDC) in majhnih otoških držav v razvoju (SIDS), in pospešujejo doseganje mednarodnega sporazuma o podnebnih spremembah.
Member States should therefore be able to use greenhouse gas emission reduction credits issued for reductions that were made during the period from 2008 to 2012 and that result from project types which were eligible for use in the Community scheme during that period.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba zato omogočiti uporabo dobropisov za zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov v obdobju 2008–2012, ki izhajajo iz projektov, ki se v tem obdobju lahko uporabljajo v sistemu Skupnosti.
Member States should also be able to use greenhouse gas emission reduction credits for reductions that were made after the period from 2008 to 2012, that result from projects that were registered during the period from 2008 to 2012 and that result from project types which were eligible for use in the Community scheme during that period.
Državam članicam bi bilo prav tako treba omogočiti uporabo dobropisov za zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov po obdobju 2008–2012, ki izhajajo iz projektov, ki so bili registrirani v obdobju 2008–2012, in ki se v tem obdobju lahko uporabljajo v sistemu Skupnosti.
Very few CDM projects have been implemented in LDCs.
V LDC je bilo izvedenih zelo malo projektov CDM.
In order to provide for further flexibility for Member States and to promote sustainable development in developing countries, Member States should be able to use additional credits from projects resulting from agreements concluded by the Community with third countries.
Za zagotovitev nadaljnje prilagodljivosti držav članic in spodbujanje trajnostnega razvoja v državah v razvoju, bi morala biti državam članicam omogočena uporaba dodatnih dobropisov iz projektov, ki izhajajo iz sporazumov, ki jih bo Skupnost sklenila s tretjimi državami.
Member States should be allowed to transfer the unused part of that quantity to other Member States.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba dovoliti, da prenesejo neuporabljeni delež te količine na druge države članice.
Certain Member States with a negative limit, or a positive limit of at most 5 %, as set out in this Decision, should, in addition to the credits referred to above, be allowed annually to use additional credits amounting to 1 % of their verified emissions in 2005 from projects in LDCs and SIDS, subject to compliance with one of the four conditions set out in this Decision.
Nekaterim državam članicam z negativno ravnjo ali s pozitivno ravnjo največ 5 %, kakor je določeno v tej odločbi, bi bilo treba poleg zgoraj omenjenih dobropisov letno dovoliti uporabo dodatnih dobropisov do višine 1 % njihovih preverjenih emisij v letu 2005 iz projektov v LDC in SIDS, če bodo izpolnili enega od štirih pogojev, določenih v tej odločbi.
This Decision should be without prejudice to more stringent national objectives.
Ta odločba ne bi smela posegati v strožje nacionalne cilje.
Where Member States limit the greenhouse gas emissions covered by this Decision beyond their obligations under this Decision in order to meet a more stringent objective, the limitation imposed by this Decision on the use of greenhouse gas emission reduction credits should not apply to the additional emission reductions to attain the national objective.
Če države članice zaradi doseganja strožjega cilja omejujejo emisije toplogrednih plinov, ki so zajete v tej odločbi, bolj kot to zahtevajo njihove obveznosti po tej odločbi, se omejitev, ki jo zahteva ta odločba o uporabi dobropisov iz zmanjšanja emisij toplogrednih plinov, ne bi smela uporabljati za dodatno zmanjšanje emisij, da bi se doseglo nacionalni cilj.
In order to increase the cost-effectiveness of attaining national objectives, in particular for Member States with ambitious objectives, Member States can make use of credits resulting from Community-level projects as defined in Article 24a of Directive 2003/87/EC.
Za povečanje stroškovne učinkovitosti pri uresničevanju nacionalnih ciljev, zlasti v državah članicah, ki imajo ambiciozne cilje, lahko države članice uporabijo dobropise iz projektov na ravni Skupnosti, določenih v členu 24a Direktive 2003/87/ES.
Once an international agreement on climate change has been reached, Member States should only accept emission reduction credits from countries which have ratified that agreement and subject to a common approach.
Po sklenitvi mednarodnega sporazuma o podnebnih spremembah bi države članice lahko sprejemale dobropise iz zmanjšanja emisij le od držav, ki bodo ratificirale sporazum, in v skladu s skupnim pristopom.
The fact that certain provisions of this Decision refer to the approval of an international agreement on climate change by the Community is without prejudice to the conclusion of that agreement also by Member States.
Dejstvo, da se nekatere določbe te odločbe nanašajo na to, da Skupnost odobri mednarodni sporazum o podnebnih spremembah, ne posega v možnost, da ta sporazum sklenejo tudi države članice.