natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to achieve a proper balance between policy tools designed to promote sustainable agriculture and those designed to promote rural development, the system of modulation should not be applied to farmers in the new Member States until the level of direct payments applicable in those Member States is equal to the level applicable in the Member States other than the new Member States.
Da bi dosegli pravilno uravnoteženost med instrumenti politike, katerih namen je spodbujati trajnostno kmetijstvo, in instrumenti, katerih namen je spodbujati razvoj podeželja, se sistem modulacije ne bi smel uporabljati za kmete v novih državah članicah, dokler raven neposrednih plačil, ki se uporabljajo v teh državah članicah, ni enaka ravni, ki se uporablja v državah članicah, ki niso nove države članice.
Modulation should not reduce the net amount paid to a farmer in a new Member State below the amount to be paid to an equivalent farmer in the Member States other than the new Member States.
Modulacija ne bi smela zmanjšati neto zneska, ki se izplača kmetu v novi državi članici, pod znesek, ki se izplača enakovrednemu kmetu v državah članicah, ki niso nove države članice.
Therefore, once modulation becomes applicable to farmers in the new Member States, the rate of reduction should be limited to the difference between the level under the phasing-in schedule and the level in the Member States other than the new Member States following the application of modulation.
Potem ko se bo modulacija začela uporabljati za kmete v novih državah članicah, bi se morala stopnja znižanja omejiti na razliko med ravnjo v okviru razporeda za postopno uvajanje in ravnjo v državah članicah, ki niso nove države članice po uporabi modulacije.
Moreover, modulation should be taken into account in the granting of complementary national direct payments to farmers in new Member States who are subject to modulation.
Poleg tega bi se morala modulacija upoštevati pri odobritvi dopolnilnih nacionalnih neposrednih plačil za kmete v novih državah članicah, za katere se uporablja modulacija.
In view of the particular weight in the general budget of the European Communities of the resource referred to in Article 2(1)(c) of Council Decision 2007/436/EC, Euratom of 7 June 2007 on the system of the European Communities' own resources [10], it is appropriate to provide, exceptionally, for the Council to adopt the necessary decision to apply the instrument of financial discipline on a proposal from the Commission.
Ob upoštevanju posebnega pomena vira v splošnem proračunu Evropskih skupnosti iz člena 2(1)(c) Sklepa Sveta 2007/436/ES, Euratom o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Evropskih skupnosti [10] bi bilo treba izjemoma določiti, da Svet potreben sklep o uporabi instrumenta finančne discipline sprejme na predlog Komisije.
In order to help farmers to meet the standards of modern, high-quality agriculture, it is necessary that Member States continue to operate the comprehensive system offering advice to farms provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003.
Da bi kmetom pomagale izpolniti standarde modernega visokokakovostnega kmetijstva, morajo države članice še naprej upravljati celovit sistem, ki kmetijam ponuja svetovanje, določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 1782/2003.
The farm advisory system should help farmers to become more aware of material flows and on-farm processes relating to the environment, food safety, animal health and welfare without in any way affecting their obligation and responsibility to comply with those standards.
Sistem kmetijskega svetovanja naj bi pomagal kmetom, da bolje spoznajo materialne tokove in postopke na kmetiji, povezane z okoljem, varno hrano ter zdravjem in dobrim počutjem živali, ne da bi kakor koli vplival na njihovo obveznost in odgovornost, da te standarde spoštujejo.
Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 provides that Member States have to take the measures necessary to satisfy themselves that transactions financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) are actually carried out and are executed correctly, and to prevent and deal with irregularities.
Po Uredbi (ES) št. 1290/2005 države članice sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe, s katerimi zagotovijo, da so transakcije, ki se financirajo iz Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada (EKJS), dejansko izvedene in pravilno izvršene, ter da se preprečijo in obravnavajo nepravilnosti.
To this end, they should operate an integrated administration and control system for direct payments.
V ta namen bi morale upravljati integrirani administrativni in kontrolni sistem za neposredna plačila.
In order to improve the effectiveness and control of Community support, Member States should be authorised to make use of the integrated system also in the case of Community schemes not covered by this Regulation.
Da bi lahko izboljšale učinkovitost in nadzor nad podporo Skupnosti, bi morale biti države članice pooblaščene, da uporabijo integrirani sistem tudi v primeru shem Skupnosti, ki niso zajete v tej uredbi.
The main elements of the integrated administration and control system and, in particular, the provisions concerning a computerised database, an identification system for agricultural parcels, aid applications from farmers, a harmonised control system and, within the single payment scheme, a system for the identification and recording of payment entitlements should be maintained.
Ohraniti bi bilo treba glavne elemente integriranega administrativnega in kontrolnega sistema ter zlasti določbe o računalniški zbirki podatkov, sistemu identifikacije enot rabe ali poljin, zahtevke kmetov za pomoč, usklajen sistem kontrole ter v okviru sheme enotnega plačila, sistem za identifikacijo in evidenco pravic do plačila.
Managing small amounts is a burdensome task for the competent authorities of the Member States.
Upravljanje majhnih zneskov je težavna naloga za pristojne organe držav članic.
To avoid an excessive administrative burden, Member States should in general refrain from granting direct payments where the payment would be lower than EUR 100 or the eligible area of the holding for which support is claimed would be less than one hectare.
Da bi preprečili pretirano upravno obremenitev, bi se morale države članice na splošno vzdržati dodeljevanja neposrednih plačil, če bi bilo plačilo nižje od 100 EUR oziroma bi upravičena površina kmetijskega gospodarstva, za katero se zahteva podpora, znašala manj kot en hektar.
However, as the structures of the Member States' agricultural economies vary considerably and may differ significantly from the average Community farm structure, special provision should be made to allow Member States to apply minimum thresholds that reflect their particular situation.
Ker pa se strukture kmetijskih gospodarstev držav članic med seboj znatno razlikujejo in se lahko precej razlikujejo od povprečne kmetijske strukture Skupnosti, bi bilo treba predvideti posebno določbo, ki bi državam članicam omogočila uporabo najnižjih mejnih vrednosti, ki bi odražale njihov poseben položaj.
Due to the very specific farming structure in the outermost regions and the Aegean Islands, these regions should not be subject to the application of any minimum threshold.
Zaradi zelo specifične kmetijske strukture v najbolj oddaljenih regijah in na egejskih otokih za te regije ne bi smeli uporabljati nikakršnih najnižjih mejnih vrednosti.
Moreover, Member States should have discretion to opt for the implementation of one of the two types of minimum threshold taking account of the particularities of the structures of their farming sectors.
Poleg tega bi morale imeti države članice možnost, da se po lastni presoji odločijo za uporabo ene od obeh vrst najnižje mejne vrednosti ob upoštevanju posebnosti struktur njihovih kmetijskih sektorjev.
As special payment entitlements were allocated to farmers with so-called ‘landless’ holdings, the application of the hectare-based threshold would be ineffective.
Ker so bile pravice do plačila dodeljene kmetom s tako imenovanimi kmetijskimi gospodarstvi „brez zemljišča“, bi bila uporaba mejne vrednosti na podlagi hektarja neučinkovita.
The average support-related minimum amount should therefore apply to such farmers.
Za take kmete bi moral zato veljati povprečni najmanjši znesek, povezan s podporo.
To ensure equal treatment of farmers whose direct payments are subject to phasing-in, the minimum threshold should be based on the final amounts to be granted at the end of the phasing-in process.
Za zagotovitev enakega obravnavanja kmetov, katerih neposredna plačila so predmet postopnega uvajanja, bi morale najnižje mejne vrednosti temeljiti na končnih zneskih, ki se dodelijo ob koncu postopka postopnega uvajanja.
Experience of the application of the single payment scheme shows that decoupled income support was in a number of cases granted to beneficiaries whose agricultural activities formed only an insignificant part of their overall economic activities or whose business purpose was not or only marginally targeted at performing an agricultural activity.
Izkušnje pri uporabi sheme enotnega plačila kažejo, da je bila proizvodno nevezana dohodkovna podpora v mnogih primerih dodeljena upravičencem, katerih kmetijske dejavnosti so predstavljale le majhen delež vseh gospodarskih dejavnosti ali katerih poslovni namen ni imel ali je imel le v zanemarljivi meri za cilj opravljanje kmetijske dejavnosti.
To prevent agricultural income support from being allocated to such beneficiaries and to ensure that Community support is entirely used to ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, Member States should be empowered, where such allocation occurs, to refrain from granting such natural and legal persons direct payments under this Regulation.
Da se prepreči dodeljevanje kmetijske dohodkovne podpore takšnim upravičencem in zagotovi, da se podpora Skupnosti v celoti uporabi za zagotavljanje primernega življenjskega standarda kmetov, bi bilo treba države članice pooblastiti, kjer do take dodelitve pride, da takšnim fizičnim in pravnim osebam ne odobrijo neposrednih plačil v skladu s to uredbo.
Payments provided for under Community support schemes should be made by the competent national authorities to beneficiaries in full, subject to any reductions provided for in this Regulation, and within prescribed periods.
Plačila, predvidena s shemami podpore Skupnosti, bi morali pristojni državni organi prejemnikom izplačati v celoti, pri čemer se odštejejo vsa znižanja, predvidena s to uredbo, ter v predpisanih rokih.
In order to render the management of direct payments more flexible, Member States should be allowed to pay direct payments in up to two instalments per year.
Da bi postalo upravljanje neposrednih plačil bolj prilagodljivo, bi bilo treba državam članicam dovoliti, da izplačajo neposredna plačila v največ dveh obrokih na leto.
The support schemes under the CAP provide for direct income support, in particular with a view to ensuring a fair standard of living for the agricultural community.
Sheme podpore v okviru SKP predvidevajo neposredno dohodkovno podporo, zlasti z namenom, da se kmetijski skupnosti zagotovi primeren življenjski standard.
That objective is closely related to the maintenance of rural areas.
Ta cilj je tesno povezan z ohranjanjem podeželja.
In order to avoid any misallocation of Community funds, no support payments should be made to farmers who have artificially created the conditions required to obtain such payments.
Da bi se izognili neprimernim dodelitvam sredstev Skupnosti, se podpora ne bi smela izplačati kmetom, ki so umetno ustvarili pogoje, potrebne za pridobitev takih plačil.
In order to achieve the objectives of the CAP, common support schemes have to be adapted to changing developments, if necessary within short time-limits.
Da bi lahko dosegli cilje SKP, bi bilo treba skupne sheme podpore prilagoditi spreminjajočemu se razvoju, po potrebi v kratkih rokih.
Beneficiaries cannot, therefore, rely on support conditions remaining unchanged and should be prepared for a possible review of schemes, in particular in the light of economic developments or the budgetary situation.
Prejemniki se zato ne morejo zanašati na nespremenljivost pogojev za podporo in bi morali biti pripravljeni na možno revizijo shem glede na tržni razvoj ali proračunski položaj.
Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 established a single payment scheme that combined the existing various support mechanisms into a single scheme of decoupled direct payments.
Uredba (ES) št. 1782/2003 je uvedla shemo enotnega plačila, ki je združila različne obstoječe mehanizme podpore v enotno shemo proizvodno nevezanih neposrednih plačil.
Experience of the application of the single payment scheme shows that some of its elements can be simplified for the benefit of farmers and administrations.
Izkušnje pri uporabi sheme enotnega plačila kažejo, da se lahko nekateri njeni elementi poenostavijo v korist kmetov in uprav.
Furthermore, given that the single payment scheme has in the meantime been implemented by all Member States that were required to do so, a number of provisions that were linked to its initial implementation have become obsolete and should therefore be adjusted.
Poleg tega glede na to, da so medtem shemo enotnega plačila začele uporabljati vse države članice, ki so to morale storiti, so mnoge določbe, ki so bile povezane z začetkom njenega izvajanja, zastarale in bi jih bilo treba zaradi tega prilagoditi.
In this context, a significant under use of payment entitlements has been detected in some cases.
V tej zvezi je bila v nekaterih primerih ugotovljena znatna manjša uporaba pravice do plačila.
To avoid such a situation and taking into account the fact that farmers are already familiar with the functioning of the single payment scheme, the period initially fixed for returning unused payment entitlements to the national reserve should be reduced to two years.
Da se izogne takšni situaciji in ob upoštevanju dejstva, da kmetje že poznajo delovanje sheme enotnega plačila, bi bilo treba obdobje, ki je bilo prvotno določeno za vrnitev neizkoriščene pravice do plačila v nacionalno rezervo, skrajšati na dve leti.
The main elements of the single payment scheme should be maintained.
Treba bi bilo ohraniti glavne elemente sheme enotnega plačila.
In particular, the determination of national ceilings should ensure that the total level of support and entitlements does not exceed current budgetary constraints.
Zlasti določitev nacionalnih zgornjih mej bi morala zagotoviti, da skupna raven podpore in pravic ne preseže trenutnih proračunskih omejitev.
Member States should also operate a national reserve that may be used to facilitate the participation of new farmers in the scheme or to take account of specific needs in certain regions.
Države članice bi morale prav tako upravljati nacionalno rezervo, ki se lahko uporabi, da se omogoči udeležba novih kmetov v shemi, ali da se upoštevajo posebne potrebe v nekaterih regijah.
Rules on the transfer and use of payment entitlements should be laid down to prevent speculative transfer and accumulation of payment entitlements without a corresponding agricultural basis.
Določiti bi bilo treba pravila o prenosu in uporabi pravic do plačila, da se preprečijo špekulativni prenosi in kopičenje pravic do plačila brez ustrezne kmetijske podlage.
The progressive integration of further sectors into the single payment scheme makes it necessary to review the definition of the land eligible to benefit from the scheme or for the activation of payment entitlements.
Postopno vključevanje dodatnih sektorjev v shemo enotnega plačila terja pregled opredelitve zemljišča, upravičenega do plačila iz sheme ali za aktiviranje pravic do plačila.
However, provision should be made for excluding support for areas cultivated with fruit and vegetables in cases where Member States have opted for deferred integration of this sector into the single payment scheme.
Vendar bi bilo treba predvideti določbo za izključitev podpore za površine, zasajene s sadjem ali zelenjavo v primerih, ko so se države članice odločile za odloženo vključitev tega sektorja v shemo enotnega plačila.
Besides, specific measures should be laid down for hemp to prevent support being granted for illegal crops.
Poleg tega je treba določiti posebne ukrepe za konopljo, da se prepreči dodeljevanje podpore za nezakonite pridelke.
Compulsory set aside of arable land was introduced as a supply control mechanism.
Obvezna praha ornih zemljišč je bila uvedena kot mehanizem za nadzor ponudbe.
Market developments in the arable crops sector together with the introduction of decoupled aids no longer justify the need for maintaining this instrument, which therefore should be abolished.
Razvoj trga v sektorju poljščin skupaj z uvedbo nevezanih pomoči ne opravičuje več potrebe po ohranjanju tega instrumenta, ki bi ga bilo treba zato odpraviti.
Set-aside entitlements established in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 should therefore be activated as regards hectares subject to the same eligibility conditions as any other entitlement.
Pravice za praho, vzpostavljene v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1782/2003, bi bilo zato treba glede hektarjev aktivirati pod enakimi pogoji za upravičenost, kot veljajo za katere koli druge pravice.
The abolition of the set-aside obligation may lead to the result that land that was eligible for the purpose of activating set-aside entitlements is no longer eligible.
Odprava obveznosti prahe bi lahko privedla do tega, da zemljišče, ki je bilo prej upravičeno do aktiviranja pravic do prahe, do tega ne bi bilo več upravičeno.
In order to maintain the eligibility of such land, it should be provided that certain afforested areas, including those afforested under national schemes complying with the relevant rules in Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, or areas subject to certain environmental commitments are eligible under the single payment scheme.
Da se ohrani upravičenost takšnega zemljišča, bi bilo treba predvideti, da so nekatere pogozdene površine, vključno s površinami, pogozdenimi v okviru nacionalnih shem, ki so skladne z ustreznimi pravili iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005, ali površine, za katere veljajo nekatere okoljske obveznosti, upravičene v okviru sheme enotnega plačila.
Further to the integration of formerly coupled market support into the single payment scheme, the value of payment entitlements was, in those Member States opting for historic implementation, based on the individual level of past support.
Poleg vključevanja nekdaj proizvodno vezane tržne podpore v shemo enotnega plačila je vrednost pravice do plačila v tistih državah članicah, ki so se odločile za izvedbo preteklega sistema, temeljila na posamezni ravni pretekle podpore.
With the time elapsing since the introduction of the single payment scheme and following the successive integration of further sectors into that scheme, it is becoming increasingly hard to justify the legitimacy of significant individual differences in the support level which are based only on past support.
Z časom, ki je pretekel od uvedbe sheme enotnega plačila, in po zaporednih vključitvah nadaljnjih sektorjev v to shemo, je čedalje težje upravičiti legitimnost precejšnih posameznih razlik v ravni podpore, ki temeljijo samo na pretekli podpori.
For this reason, Member States that chose the historic implementation model should be allowed under certain conditions to review the allocated payment entitlements with a view to approximating their unit value while complying with the general principles of Community law and the objectives of the CAP.
Zaradi tega bi bilo treba državam članicam, ki so izbrale pretekli model izvedbe, pod nekaterimi pogoji dovoliti, da revidirajo dodeljene pravice do plačila z namenom poenotenja njihove vrednosti na enoto ob hkratnem spoštovanju splošnih načel prava Skupnosti in ciljev SKP.
In this context, Member States may take into account the specificities of geographical areas when fixing closer values.
V tej zvezi lahko države članice pri določanju natančnejših vrednosti upoštevajo posebnosti geografskih območij.
The levelling of payment entitlements should take place during an adequate transition period and within a limited range of reductions in order to allow farmers reasonably to adapt to the changing levels of support.
Izravnava pravic do plačila bi morala potekati v ustreznem prehodnem obdobju in znotraj omejenega razpona znižanj, da se kmetom omogoči, da se primerno prilagodijo na spreminjajoče se ravni podpore.
Under Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, Member States had the option to apply the single payment scheme by way of historic or regional implementation.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1782/2003 imajo države članice možnost uporabiti shemo enotnega plačila na podlagi pretekle ali regionalne izvedbe.
Since then, Member States have had the opportunity to evaluate the effects of their choice as regards both their economic and administrative appropriateness.
Od tedaj imajo države članice priložnost oceniti učinke izbranega modela izvedbe glede na njegovo ekonomsko in administrativno ustreznost.
Member States should therefore be given the opportunity to review their initial choice in the light of their experience.
Državam članicam bi bilo zato treba dati možnost, da revidirajo svojo prvotno odločitev na podlagi lastnih izkušenj.
For this reason, in addition to the possibility of levelling the value of payment entitlements, Member States that applied the historic model should be authorised to change over to a regionalised application of the single payment scheme in accordance with the options already provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003.
Zaradi tega bi bilo treba poleg možnosti izravnave vrednosti pravic do plačila dovoliti državam članicam, ki so uporabile pretekli model, da preidejo na regionalno uporabo sheme enotnega plačila v skladu z možnostmi, ki obstajajo že po Uredbi (ES) št. 1782/2003.
In particular, Member States should be allowed to adjust the territorial distribution of direct support by effecting a gradual redistribution between regions.
Državam članicam bi morala biti zlasti omogočena prilagoditev ozemeljske porazdelitve neposredne podpore s postopno prerazdelitvijo med regijami.
This option would give Member States increased flexibility to target direct support in the most appropriate way on the basis of the objectives laid down in Article 33 of the Treaty and on the basis of objective and non-discriminatory criteria such as agricultural potential and environmental criteria.
Ta možnost bi državam članicam zagotovila večjo prožnost, da bi lahko najustrezneje usmerile neposredno podporo v skladu s cilji iz člena 33 Pogodbe ter v skladu z objektivnimi in nediskriminatornimi merili, kot so kmetijski potencial in okoljska merila.
Furthermore, Member States that chose to apply the regional model should be given the option to review their decisions under certain conditions with the aim of approximating the value of payment entitlements according to pre-established annual steps, while complying with the general principles of Community law and the objectives of the CAP.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba državam članicam, ki so izbrale uporabo regionalnega modela, dati možnost, da svoje odločitve pod določenimi pogoji revidirajo z namenom poenotenja vrednosti pravic do plačila glede na vnaprej določene letne korake ob hkratnem spoštovanju splošnih načel prava Skupnosti in ciljev SKP.
Such changes should take place during an adequate transition period and within a limited range of reductions in order to allow farmers reasonably to adapt to the changing levels of support.
Take spremembe bi morale potekati v ustreznem prehodnem obdobju in znotraj omejenega razpona znižanj, da se kmetom omogoči, da se primerno prilagodijo na spreminjajoče se ravni podpore.
Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, while introducing a decoupled single payment scheme, allowed Member States to exclude in whole or in part certain payments from that scheme.
Uredba (ES) št. 1782/2003 je s tem, ko je uvedla shemo proizvodno nevezanega enotnega plačila, omogočila državam članicam, da iz te sheme v celoti ali delno izključijo nekatera plačila.
That Regulation also provided for the review and possible revision of this option in the light of market and structural developments.
Navedena uredba določa tudi pregled in morebitno revizijo te možnosti glede na tržni in strukturni razvoj.