natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In general, export aid is traditionally defined in Article 1(d) as ‘aid directly linked to the quantities exported, to the establishment and operation of a distribution network or to other current costs linked to the export activity’.
Na splošno je izvozna pomoč opredeljena v členu 1(d) kot „pomoč, neposredno povezana z izvoženimi količinami, z ustanovitvijo in delovanjem distribucijske mreže ali drugimi tekočimi izdatki, povezanimi z izvozno dejavnostjo“.
By letter of 30 May 2008 the Spanish authorities confirmed that the measure was intended to encourage firms that had so far not exported to come to international fairs.
Španski organi so z dopisom z dne 30. maja 2008 potrdili, da je bil ukrep namenjen spodbujanju podjetij, ki do zdaj niso izvažala, da se udeležijo mednarodnih sejmov.
It therefore met that condition.
Zato je izpolnjeval ta pogoj.
Aid for setting up information infrastructure via Internet portals is not export aid and therefore falls within the scope of the de minimis Regulation.
Pomoč za vzpostavitev informacijske infrastrukture s spletnimi portali ni izvozna pomoč, zato se zanjo uporablja Uredba de minimis.
Lastly, the provision of consultancy services to foster companies’ export potential is covered by the de minimis Regulation and therefore does not come under the definition of export aid.
Zagotavljanje svetovalnih storitev za spodbujanje izvoznih možnosti podjetij je zajeto z Uredbo de minimis, zato ni vključeno v opredelitev izvozne pomoči.
Nevertheless, the Commission continued to harbour doubts about whether the Spanish authorities had complied with the de minimis Regulation in the past.
Kljub temu je Komisija še vedno imela pomisleke, ali so španski organi v preteklosti upoštevali Uredbo de minimis.
It therefore asked the Spanish authorities to prove on the basis of Article 3(3) of the de minimis Regulation that it had been complied with in the past as regards measures 4 and 5.
Zato je španske organe pozvala, da na podlagi člena 3(3) Uredbe de minimis dokažejo, da je bila v zvezi z ukrepoma 4 in 5 ta uredba v preteklosti upoštevana.
The Commission also called on the Spanish authorities to undertake to respect the Regulation in future, in accordance with Article 3(1).
Poleg tega je Komisija španske organe pozvala, da se zavežejo k upoštevanju Uredbe v prihodnosti v skladu s členom 3(1).
This implied that the ceiling of EUR 200000 per undertaking had been respected in all three tax years, especially as regards possible combination with other measures in the Textile Plan based on the same eligible costs.
To je pomenilo, da je bila zgornja meja v višini 200000 EUR na podjetje upoštevana v vseh treh davčnih letih, zlasti v zvezi z možnim združevanjem z drugimi ukrepi iz načrta za tekstilno industrijo na podlagi enakih upravičenih stroškov.
As already mentioned in recital 47, the Spanish authorities provided evidence that the de minimis Regulation had been complied with in the past and they undertook to respect it in future.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 47, so španski organi predložili dokaze, da so v preteklosti upoštevali Uredbo de minimis, in so se zavezali, da jo bodo upoštevali tudi v prihodnosti.
Therefore, measures 4 and 5 do not constitute State aid.
Zato ukrepa 4 in 5 ne pomenita državne pomoči.
Measure 8 is a general measure provided for by Spanish law which, according to the Spanish authorities, had never been applied under the Textile Plan.
Ukrep 8 je splošni ukrep, ki ga določa španska zakonodaja in ki po navedbah španskih organov ni bil nikoli uporabljen v skladu z načrtom za tekstilno industrijo.
If a company requested a tax deferral in future, the Spanish authorities undertook to apply the general rules and not this measure.
Če bi podjetje v prihodnosti zahtevalo odlog plačila davkov, so se španski organi zavezali, da ne bodo uporabili tega ukrepa, ampak splošna pravila.
Since measure 8 had not been applied, no State aid was involved.
Ker ukrep 8 ni bil uporabljen, s tem ni povezana državna pomoč.
Measures 1, 2, 6 and 7 were granted through State resources.
Ukrepi 1, 2, 6 in 7 so bili dodeljeni iz državnih sredstev.
These measures appear to offer a better selective advantage to companies from the textile and clothing sector than the conditions applied under the general rules and consequently to favour those undertakings.
Zdi se, da ti ukrepi zagotavljajo podjetjem iz tekstilnega in oblačilnega sektorja boljšo selektivno prednost kot pogoji, ki se uporabljajo v skladu s splošnimi pravili, zato dajejo navedenim podjetjem prednost.
There is extensive trade in the textile and clothing sector so the measures could affect trade between Member States.
V tekstilnem in oblačilnem sektorju je trgovina zelo obsežna, zato bi lahko ukrepi prizadeli trgovino med državami članicami.
Therefore, these measures constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty.
Zato ti ukrepi pomenijo državno pomoč v skladu s členom 87(1) Pogodbe.
Measures 1 and 2
Ukrepa 1 in 2
Concerning measure 1, the Commission noted that the approved aid scheme N 415/2004 is only applicable to large enterprises and eligible R & D activities: personnel costs, relevant instruments and equipment, external consultancy costs, operating costs and additional general costs deriving from the research activity.
V zvezi z ukrepom 1 je Komisija ugotovila, da se odobrena shema pomoči N 415/2004 uporablja le za velika podjetja in upravičene raziskovalne in razvojne dejavnosti: stroške dela, ustrezne instrumente in opremo, stroške zunanjega svetovanja, operativne stroške in dodatne splošne stroške, ki nastanejo zaradi raziskovalne dejavnosti.
The budget was EUR 16 million in the form of grants and EUR 74,45 million in the form of subsidised loans.
Proračun je bil 16 milijonov EUR v obliki donacij in 74,45 milijona EUR v obliki subvencioniranih posojil.
The Textile Plan defined the following as eligible projects for large enterprises: R & D projects, projects to disseminate the results of R & D activities and projects to set up and develop inter-company cooperation agreements.
V načrtu za tekstilno industrijo so bili kot upravičeni projekti za velika podjetja opredeljeni: raziskovalni in razvojni projekti, projekti za razširjanje rezultatov raziskovalnih in razvojnih dejavnosti ter projekti za pripravo in razvoj sporazumov o sodelovanju med podjetji.
The budget was EUR 12,5 million in the form of grants and EUR 51 million in the form of subsidised loans.
Proračun je bil 12,5 milijona EUR v obliki donacij in 51 milijonov EUR v obliki subvencioniranih posojil.
On 13 January 2008 the Spanish authorities reiterated that they would respect the conditions imposed on the scheme.
Španski organi so 13. januarja 2008 ponovno potrdili, da bodo upoštevali pogoje, opredeljene za shemo.
On this basis, the Commission must conclude that measure 1 for large undertakings fulfils the criteria laid down in the scheme.
Glede na to Komisija ugotavlja, da ukrep 1 za velika podjetja izpolnjuje merila iz sheme.
As regards measure 1 for SMEs, which according to the Textile Plan are the main focus of measure 1, the Spanish authorities explained that it would be covered by aid scheme XS 50/2005.
V zvezi z ukrepom 1 za MSP, ki so v skladu z načrtom za tekstilno industrijo glavni element ukrepa 1, so španski organi pojasnili, da ga bo zajemala shema pomoči XS 50/2005.
The objectives of scheme XS 50/2005 are to promote research projects for SMEs, enhance cooperation between SMEs and research entities and to disseminate research results.
Cilji sheme XS 50/2005 so pospeševanje raziskovalnih projektov za MSP, okrepitev sodelovanja med MSP in raziskovalnimi subjekti ter razširjanje rezultatov raziskav.
Like the previous scheme, this one covers personnel costs, relevant instruments and equipment, external consultancy costs, operating costs and additional general costs deriving from the research activity, as well as investment in tangible and intangible assets and consultancy services.
Podobno kot prejšnja shema tudi ta zajema stroške dela, ustrezne instrumente in opremo, stroške zunanjega svetovanja, operativne stroške in dodatne splošne stroške, ki nastanejo zaradi raziskovalne dejavnosti, naložbe v opredmetena in neopredmetena sredstva ter svetovalne storitve.
The annual budget was EUR 22 million in the form of grants and subsidised loans.
Letni proračun je bil 22 milijonov EUR v obliki donacij in subvencioniranih posojil.
The eligible projects of the Textile Plan were R & D projects, investments in tangible and intangible assets with a view to incorporating advanced technologies in their production processes, projects to disseminate the results of R & D activities and projects to set up and develop inter-company cooperation agreements.
Upravičeni projekti iz načrta za tekstilno industrijo so bili raziskovalni in razvojni projekti, naložbe v opredmetena in neopredmetena sredstva, katerih namen je bil vključitev napredne tehnologije v njihove proizvodne postopke, projekti za razširjanje rezultatov raziskovalnih in razvojnih dejavnosti ter projekti za pripravo in razvoj sporazumov o sodelovanju med podjetji.
The Commission is of the view that measure 1 applicable to SMEs fulfils the criteria laid down in aid scheme N 415/2004, which has already been approved, and in aid scheme XS 50/2005.
Komisija meni, da ukrep 1, ki se uporablja za MSP, izpolnjuje merila iz že odobrene sheme pomoči N 415/2004 in sheme pomoči XS 50/2005.
The scheme was open to all industrial enterprises that invested in assisted regions except the coal, steel and synthetic fibre sectors.
V shemo so se lahko vključila vsa industrijska podjetja, ki so vlagala v regije prejemnice pomoči, razen premogovništva, jeklarstva in sektorja sintetičnih vlaken.
The aid had to be disbursed as interest-free loans of a maximum duration of 10 years including a 5-year grace period.
Pomoč je bilo treba izplačati v obliki brezobrestnih posojil z največ 10-letnim trajanjem, vključno s 5-letnim obdobjem odloga.
The planned budget was EUR 400 million.
Načrtovani proračun je bil 400 milijonov EUR.
The Textile Plan meets the basic criteria apart from the one for interest-free loans.
Načrt za tekstilno industrijo izpolnjuje osnovna merila, razen za brezobrestna posojila.
These had a maximum duration of 15 years with a 5-year grace period instead of the maximum duration of 10 years as specified in point 11 of the scheme.
Ta posojila so trajala največ 15 let s 5-letnim obdobjem odloga namesto največ 10 let, kot je opredeljeno v točki 11 sheme.
After examining this point the Commission must accept it since Chapter I 7,2 of Order ITC/3098/2006 states that the maximum duration is 10 years plus a 5-year grace period.
Potem ko je Komisija to točko preučila, jo mora sprejeti, ker je v poglavju I 7.2 Odredbe ITC/3098/2006 navedeno, da je najdaljše trajanje 10 let z dodatnim 5-letnim obdobjem odloga.
The Commission must therefore conclude that measure 2 meets the criteria laid down in the scheme.
Zato Komisija ugotavlja, da ukrep 2 izpolnjuje merila iz sheme.
On 3 July 2006, the Spanish authorities re-notified the scheme in order to bring it into line with the new regional aid guidelines [24] (N 430/2007) and on 26 January 2007 they withdrew it in order to base it on Commission Regulation (EC) No 1628/2006 of 24 October 2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to national regional investment aid [25].
Španski organi so 3. julija 2006 shemo ponovno priglasili, da bi jo uskladili z novimi smernicami o regionalni pomoči [24] (N 430/2007), pri čemer so jo 26. januarja 2007 preklicali, da bi jo pripravili na podlagi Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1628/2006 z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe pri državni regionalni pomoči za naložbe [25].
On 20 March 2007 scheme XR/70/2007 was adopted.
Shema XR/70/2007 je bila sprejeta 20. marca 2007.
In accordance with Order ITC/3098/2006 and Order ITC/643/2007, eligible projects included: technical infrastructure, setting up technology parks, transfer of specialist know-how, strengthening and diversifying the local economy, creating new industrial activities, developing mature sectors and creating and expanding emerging sectors.
V skladu z Odredbo ITC/3098/2006 in Odredbo ITC/643/2007 so upravičeni projekti vključevali: tehnično infrastrukturo, ustanovitev tehnoloških parkov, prenos strokovnega znanja in izkušenj, okrepitev in diverzifikacijo lokalnega gospodarstva, vzpostavitev novih industrijskih dejavnosti, razvoj zrelih sektorjev ter vzpostavitev in širitev sektorjev v vzponu.
The synthetic fibres industry was not eligible and the measure qualified as initial investment.
Industrija sintetičnih vlaken ni bila upravičena in ukrep se je štel kot začetna naložba.
The Commission is therefore of the view that measure 2 fulfils the criteria set out in approved aid schemes N 101/2005 and XR/70/2007.
Zato Komisija meni, da ukrep 2 izpolnjuje merila iz odobrenih shem pomoči N 101/2005 in XR/70/2007.
The Spanish authorities also undertook not to apply the measures after the expiry of the schemes they were based on.
Poleg tega so se španski organi zavezali, da ukrepov ne bodo uporabljali po prenehanju veljavnosti shem, na katerih temeljijo.
The Commission therefore considers that measures 1 and 2 were covered by those schemes and should thus constitute compatible aid.
Zato Komisija meni, da sta bila ukrepa 1 in 2 zajeta z navedenima shemama, zato morata pomeniti združljivo pomoč.
The Commission considers that this measure on specific training is not covered by either Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 of 6 August 2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General block exemption Regulation) [26] or the previous Regulation on aid for training, as the measure does not concern ‘new employment’ and large enterprises also benefit from it.
Komisija meni, da ta ukrep o posebnem usposabljanju ni zajet z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 800/2008 z dne 6. avgusta 2008 o razglasitvi nekaterih vrst pomoči za združljive s skupnim trgom z uporabo členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe (Uredba o splošnih skupinskih izjemah) [26] ali prejšnjo Uredbo o pomoči za usposabljanje, ker ukrep ni povezan z „novim zaposlovanjem“ in imajo koristi od njega tudi velika podjetja.
The Commission must therefore assess it directly on the basis of Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty.
Zato ga mora Komisija oceniti neposredno na podlagi člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe.
Accordingly, aid to facilitate the development of certain economic activities may be considered compatible with the common market, where it does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest.
V skladu s tem se lahko pomoč za pospeševanje razvoja določenih gospodarskih dejavnosti šteje za združljivo s skupnim trgom, kadar ne spreminja trgovinskih pogojev v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
The Commission will assess the compatibility of measure 6 by analogy [27] with the Training aid Regulation between 2006 and 1 August 2008 and with the General block exemption Regulation from 29 August 2008 until 31 December 2008.
Komisija bo ocenila združljivost ukrepa 6 po analogiji [27] z Uredbo o pomoči za usposabljanje med letom 2006 in 1. avgustom 2008 in z Uredbo o splošnih skupinskih izjemah od 29. avgusta 2008 do 31. decembra 2008.
The intensity of the specific training aid was 19,96 % for SMEs and 20 % for large enterprises.
Intenzivnost pomoči za posebno usposabljanje je bila 19,96 % za MSP in 20 % za velika podjetja.
This aid intensity is well below the threshold of 35 % that the Training aid Regulation imposes on the application for training aid and the 25 % imposed by Article 39 of the General block exemption Regulation.
Ta intenzivnost pomoči je znatno nižja od praga 35 %, ki ga Uredba o pomoči za usposabljanje določa za uporabo pomoči za usposabljanje, in praga 25 % iz člena 39 Uredbe o splošnih skupinskih izjemah.
Furthermore, the amounts barely diverge from the general rules.
Poleg tega se zneski skoraj ne razlikujejo od splošnih pravil.
The increase depends on the number of staff employed and the contribution paid to the social security system the previous year.
Povečanje je odvisno od števila zaposlenih in prispevka, ki je bil prejšnje leto plačan v sistem za socialno varnost.
The conditions for entitlement to the measure were very restrictive, as the companies had to establish a plan, which needed to be approved by the Joint Committee (see recital 24).
Pogoji upravičenosti do ukrepa so bili zelo restriktivni, ker so morala podjetja pripraviti načrt, ki ga je moral potrditi Skupni odbor (glejte uvodno izjavo 24).
On 20 February 2009, the Spanish authorities confirmed that the additional incentive effect for large enterprises pursuant to Article 8(3) of the General block exemption Regulation was already taken into account in paragraph I. 1.A c) of the Textile Plan.
Španski organi so 20. februarja 2009 potrdili, da je bil dodatni spodbujevalni učinek za velika podjetja v skladu s členom 8(3) Uredbe o splošnih skupinskih izjemah upoštevan že v odstavku I. 1.A c) načrta za tekstilno industrijo.
Accordingly, the applicant companies had to present a retraining plan to the Public Employment Service detailing the employment objectives and the specific measures.
V skladu s tem so morala podjetja, ki so zaprosila za pomoč, javnemu zavodu za zaposlovanje predložiti načrt preusposabljanja, v katerem so bili natančno opredeljeni cilji zaposlovanja in posebni ukrepi.
The Public Employment Service checked that one or more of the requirements in the above Article of the General block exemption Regulation were met.
Javni zavod za zaposlovanje je preveril, ali je izpolnjena ena ali več zahtev iz navedenega člena Uredbe o splošnih skupinskih izjemah.
This plan included a document giving the productivity and job maintenance objectives and the size of the investment in question.
Ta načrt je vključeval dokument, v katerem so bili navedeni cilji glede produktivnosti in ohranitve delovnih mest ter obseg zadevne naložbe.
The Joint Committee also issued a report on the retraining plan submitted by each company or group.
Poleg tega je Skupni odbor izdal poročilo o načrtu preusposabljanja, ki ga je predložilo vsako podjetje ali skupina.
On the basis of the information provided in the plan and the report submitted by the Industrial Observatories, the Member State checked that the criteria for the incentive effect for large enterprises were met.
Na podlagi informacij iz načrta in poročila, ki so ga predložili industrijski observatoriji, je država članica preverila, ali so merila za spodbujevalni učinek za velika podjetja izpolnjena.
The Commission must conclude that the effect of the aid on competition and trade is very limited.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je vpliv pomoči na konkurenco in trgovino zelo omejen.
The Commission therefore considers that the measure does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Zato Komisija meni, da ukrep ne spreminja trgovinskih pogojev v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
Therefore, the Commission considers this measure compatible with the common market on the basis of Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty.
Zato Komisija meni, da je ta ukrep združljiv s skupnim trgom na podlagi člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe.
Measure 7 is also granted through State resources and apparently favours the sector.
Tudi ukrep 7 je dodeljen iz državnih sredstev in domnevno daje prednost sektorju.
Regarding compatibility, it does not appear to be covered entirely by Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 (General block exemption Regulation) or by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 of 12 December 2002 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid for employment [28], given that 37 firms out of a total of 11544 active in the sector in 2007 are large enterprises and the measure does not concern new employment.
V zvezi z združljivostjo se zdi, da ga ne zajema v celoti člen 15 Uredbe (ES) št. 800/2008 (Uredba o splošnih skupinskih izjemah) ali Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2204/2002 z dne 12. decembra 2002 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe o ES za državne pomoči na področju zaposlovanja [28], ker je 37 podjetij od skupaj 11544 podjetij, ki so bila leta 2007 dejavna v tem sektorju, velikih podjetij in ukrep ni povezan z novim zaposlovanjem.
Therefore, the present measure is assessed on the basis of Article 87(3)(c) [29].
Zato je ta ukrep ocenjen na podlagi člena 87(3)(c) [29].
State aid in the form of wage subsidies designed to raise the demand for disadvantaged workers ‘can provide additional incentives to enterprises to increase their levels of employment of this category of workers.’
Državna pomoč v obliki subvencij plače, ki naj bi prispevala k večjemu povpraševanju po prikrajšanih delavcih, „lahko dodatno spodbudi podjetja k večjemu zaposlovanju te kategorije delavcev“.
The workers concerned fall within the category of disadvantaged workers by being over 50 years old.
Zadevni delavci spadajo v kategorijo prikrajšanih delavcev, ker so starejši od 50 let.
76 % of the workers aged between 55 and 59 years had low training and skills, which prevented their transfer to other sectors if they were laid off. As regards the number of workers concerned, only 10215 of the 123574 employees in the sector in 2008 were aged between 55 and 59 and only 6700 had worked in the company for more than 5 years and had open-ended contracts.
76 % delavcev, starih 55 do 59 let, je bilo nizko kvalificiranih in usposobljenih, kar bi oteževalo njihov prehod v druge sektorje, če bi bili odpuščeni. V zvezi s številom zadevnih delavcev je ugotovljeno, da je bilo od 123574 delavcev v sektorju leta 2008 le 10215 delavcev starih 55 do 59 let, pri čemer jih je le 6700 delalo v podjetju več kot 5 let in so imeli pogodbe za nedoločen čas.
This figure corresponded to 5,2 % of all workers in the sector and the intensity of the measure per company was estimated at 0,3 % of their labour costs, which is well under the threshold of 50 % of the eligible costs provided for in Article 40 of the General block exemption Regulation.
To pomeni 5,2 % vseh delavcev v sektorju, pri čemer je bila intenzivnost ukrepa na podjetje ocenjena na 0,3 % njegovih stroškov dela, kar je znatno pod pragom 50 % upravičenih stroškov iz člena 40 Uredbe o splošnih skupinskih izjemah.
The impact of the measure was also slight as it mainly concerned (74 %) microenterprises and the amount of aid was minimal (0,3 % of labour costs).
Poleg tega je bil učinek ukrepa majhen, ker je bil povezan zlasti (74 %) z mikropodjetji in je bil znesek pomoči zelo majhen (0,3 % stroškov dela).
Although the financial impact for the company was minimal, according to the Spanish authorities it provided an incentive to keep the employees in question in their jobs for a few more years rather than firing them or employing them undeclared.
Čeprav je bil finančni učinek za podjetje zelo majhen, je po navedbah španskih organov pomenil spodbudo za ohranitev delovnih mest zadevnih delavcev za nekaj let, namesto da bi jih odpustili ali zaposlili brez prijave.
Therefore, the aid appeared to be necessary, proportional and well-targeted at the age group of disadvantaged workers.
Zato se zdi, da je pomoč potrebna, sorazmerna in ustrezno usmerjena v starostno skupino prikrajšanih delavcev.
As regards the negative effects of the aid, it should be noted that the measure is focused solely on the textile and clothing sector, a declining industry with 40 % job losses since 2001.
V zvezi z negativnimi učinki pomoči je treba opozoriti, da je ukrep namenjen le tekstilnemu in oblačilnemu sektorju, tj. nazadujoči industriji s 40-odstotno stopnjo izgube delovnih mest od leta 2001.