natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In view of the apparent high number of exporting producers in the PRC and importers in the Community the Commission indicated in the notice of initiation that sampling might be applied in this investigation for the determination of dumping and injury in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je glede na očitno veliko število proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK in uvoznikov v Skupnosti v obvestilu o začetku navedla, da bo morda v tej preiskavi za ugotovitev dampinga in škode v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe uporabila vzorčenje.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and if so, to select a sample, all exporting producers in the PRC and importers in the Community were asked to make themselves known to the Commission and to provide, as specified in the notice of initiation, basic information on their activities related to the product concerned during the period 1 July 2007-30 June 2008.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, so bili vsi proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK in uvozniki v Skupnosti pozvani, naj se javijo Komisiji in predložijo osnovne informacije o svojih dejavnostih, povezanih z zadevnim izdelkom v obdobju od 1. julija 2007 do 30. junija 2008, kot je navedeno v obvestilu o začetku.
Six exporting producers in the PRC responded to the sampling exercise.
Šest proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK se je odzvalo na vzorčenje.
However one company withdrew from further cooperation with the investigation at an early stage, leaving only five exporting producers remaining.
Vendar je ena družba v zgodnji fazi preiskave prekinila sodelovanje, zato je ostalo le pet proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Sampling was therefore no longer necessary and all parties were informed that a sample would not be selected.
Zato vzorčenje ni bilo več potrebno, vse stranke pa so bile obveščene, da vzorec ne bo izbran.
Eight importers/users responded to the sampling exercise.
Na vzorčenje se je odzvalo osem uvoznikov/uporabnikov.
Questionnaires were sent to all parties known to be concerned and to all other companies that made themselves known within the deadlines set out in the notice of initiation.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani vsem strankam, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in vsem ostalim družbam, ki so se javile v rokih iz obvestila o začetku.
Replies were received from one exporting producer in Armenia, five in the PRC and one in Brazil, and one producer in the analogue country, Turkey.
Vprašalnike je izpolnil en proizvajalec izvoznik iz Armenije, pet iz LRK, eden iz Brazilije in en proizvajalec iz primerljive države, tj. Turčije.
Full questionnaire replies were also received from 6 Community producers and 8 importers/users cooperated by submitting a questionnaire reply.
V celoti izpolnjene vprašalnike je predložilo tudi 6 proizvajalcev Skupnosti, vprašalnike pa je izpolnilo tudi 8 uvoznikov/uporabnikov.
None of the final users supplied the Commission with any information or made themselves known in the course of this investigation.
Med to preiskavo Komisiji ni zagotovil informacij oziroma se ni javil noben drug končni uporabnik.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for a provisional determination of dumping, resulting injury and Community interest and carried out verifications at the premises of the following companies:
Komisija je zahtevala in preverila vse informacije, potrebne za začasno ugotovitev dampinga, škode, ki je zaradi tega nastala, in interesa Skupnosti, ter izvedla preveritvene obiske v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Alcomet PLC, Shumen, Bulgaria
Alcomet PLC Shumen, Bolgarija,
Symetal Aluminium Foil Industry S.A./Elval Hellenic Aluminium Industry S.A. Mandra Attikis, Greece
Symetal Aluminium Foil Industry S.A./Elval Hellenic Aluminium Industry S.A. Mandra Attikis, Grčija.
Alcoa (Shanghai) Aluminium Products Co., Ltd, Shanghai and Alcoa (Bohai) Aluminium Industries Co., Ltd, Hebei
Alcoa (Shanghai) Aluminium Products Co., Ltd., Shanghai and Alcoa (Bohai) Aluminium Industries Co., Ltd., Hebei,
North China Aluminium Co., Ltd, Hebei (North China)
North China Aluminium Co., Ltd., Hebei („severna Kitajska“),
Shandong Loften Aluminium Foil Co., Ltd, Shandong (Shandong)
Shandong Loften Aluminium Foil Co., Ltd., Shandong („Shandong“),
Exporting producer in Armenia
Proizvajalci izvozniki v Armeniji
Closed Joint Stock Company ‘Rusal-Armenal’, Yerevan (Armenal) and related importers in Switzerland and Russia Rual Foil Limited, Rual Trade Limited, RTI Limited, Rusal Europe Limited and Rusal Marketing Limited
Closed Joint Stock Company „Rusal-Armenal“, Yerevan („Armenal“) in povezani uvozniki v Švici ter Russia Rual Foil Limited, Rual Trade Limited, RTI Limited, Rusal Europe Limited in Rusal Marketing Limited.
Exporting producer in Brazil
Proizvajalec izvoznik v Braziliji
Community unrelated importers/users
Nepovezani uvozniki/uporabniki
Coutinho Caro + Co International Trading GmbH, Hamburg, Germany
Coutinho Caro + Co International Trading GmbH, Hamburg, Nemčija,
Fora Folienfabrik GmbH, Radolfzell, Germany
Fora Folienfabrik GmbH, Radolfzell, Nemčija,
ITS Foil, Film and Paper Products bv, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
ITS Foil, Film and Paper Products bv, Apeldoorn, Nizozemska,
Groupe Sphere, Paris, France.
Groupe Sphere, Paris, Francija.
In view of the need to establish a normal value for exporting producers to which MET might not be granted, a verification to establish normal value on the basis of data from Turkey as analogue country took place at the premises of the following company:
Ker je bilo treba določiti normalno vrednost za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim TGO morda ne bo odobren, je bil opravljen preveritveni obisk za določitev normalne vrednosti na podlagi podatkov iz primerljive države, tj. Turčije, in sicer v prostorih naslednje družbe:
Assan Demir ve Sac Sanayi A.Ș, Tuzla (now Assan Alüminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ș.).
Assan Demir ve Sac Sanayi A.Ș, Tuzla (sedaj Assan Alüminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ș.).
In the notice of initiation the product concerned was defined as aluminium foil of a thickness of not less than 0,008 mm and not more than 0,018 mm, not backed, not further worked than rolled, in reels of a width not exceeding 650 mm originating in Armenia, Brazil and the People’s Republic of China which was normally declared within CN code ex76071110 at the time of opening of the proceeding.
V obvestilu o začetku je bil zadevni izdelek opredeljen kot aluminijasta folija debeline najmanj 0,008 mm in ne več kot 0,018 mm, brez podlage, samo valjana, vendar dalje neobdelana, za zvitke širine največ 650 mm s poreklom iz Armenije, Brazilije in Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki je bila na začetku postopka običajno uvrščena pod oznako KN ex76071110.
The investigation revealed that the above product description included different products, and in particular so-called ‘jumbo’ and ‘consumer’ rolls.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je opredelitev zgoraj navedenega izdelka vključevala različne izdelke, zlasti tako imenovane zvitke jumbo in zvitke za široko potrošnjo.
The differences between jumbo reels and consumer rolls is mainly the weight (normally jumbo reels weigh at least 150 kg), hence the need to rewind the aluminium foil in order to transform it into a consumer product allowing it to be used for packaging and other household applications.
Razlika med zvitki jumbo in zvitki za široko potrošnjo je v glavnem v teži (običajno zvitki jumbo tehtajo najmanj 150 kg), zato je treba aluminijasto folijo previti in jo tako preoblikovati v potrošniški izdelek, ki se uporablja za embaliranje in druge gospodinjske uporabe.
The CN code ex76071110 as set out in the notice of initiation was split in January 2009 into two codes: ex76071111 (aluminium foil of a thickness of less than 0,021 mm weighing 10 kg or less for consumer rolls) and ex76071119 (same but weighing over 10 kg for jumbo reels).
Oznaka KN ex76071110 iz obvestila o začetku je od januarja 2009 razdeljena na dve oznaki: ex76071111 (aluminijaste folije debeline manj kot 0,021 mm v zvitkih z maso 10 kg ali manj za zvitke za široko potrošnjo) in ex76071119 (isto vendar z maso več kot 10 kg za zvitke jumbo).
The CN code refers to the weight of the roll of aluminium foil which is synonymous with the reel of the aluminium foil in the original product description.
Oznaka KN se nanaša na težo zvitka aluminijaste folije, ki se enači z zvitkom aluminijaste folije iz prvotnega opisa izdelka.
Both refer to the aluminium foil itself which is wound into a reel, or roll, onto a support.
Obe se nanašata na aluminijasto folijo, ki je na podpori navita v večji ali manjši zvitek.
The downstream industry in the Community, i.e. the ‘rewinders’, claimed that the product concerned should also include consumer rolls because if measures are imposed solely on imports of aluminium foil weighing over 10 kg, this could give rise to exports of the downstream products i.e. aluminium foil weighing less than 10 kg.
Panoge na koncu proizvodne verige v Skupnosti, t.i. previjalci, so trdili, da bi moral zadevni izdelek vključevati tudi zvitke za široko potrošnjo, saj se lahko izvoz izdelkov iz panog na koncu proizvodne verige, in sicer aluminijastih folij z maso manj kot 10 kg, poveča, če se ukrepi izvajajo le za uvoz aluminijaste folije z maso več kot 10 kg.
The rewind operation would take place in the exporting countries instead of Community countries and ‘rewinders’ in the Community would therefore be severely hurt.
Previjanje naj bi namesto v državah Skupnosti potekalo v državah izvoznicah, zato naj bi bili „previjalci“ v Skupnosti močno oškodovani.
This matter is addressed below in recitals 150 to 162.
Ta problem je obravnavan v uvodnih izjavah 150 do 162.
Aluminium foil is manufactured by rolling aluminium ingots or foil-stock to the desired thickness.
Aluminijasta folija se proizvaja z valjanjem aluminijastih ingotov ali hladno valjanih kolobarjev do želene debeline.
Once rolled the foil is annealed by a thermal process to make it pliable.
Ko je folija zvaljana, se jo s toplotnim postopkom žari, da postane upogljiva.
Once rolled and annealed the foil is wound onto reels of a width not exceeding 650 mm. The dimension of the reel determines its use as the users of the foil (spoolers or rewinders) will mount it onto small end-rolls destined for retail sale.
Po valjanju in žarjenju se aluminijasta folija zvije v zvitke širine ne več kot 650 mm. Dimenzija zvitka določa uporabo folije, kajti uporabniki („navijalci“ ali „previjalci“) bodo aluminijasto folijo navili ali previli v končne izdelke manjše velikosti, namenjene prodaji na drobno.
In light of the above considerations, it is concluded that the product concerned is aluminium foil of a thickness of not less than 0,008 mm and not more than 0,018 mm, not backed, not further worked than rolled, in rolls of a width not exceeding 650 mm and of a weight exceeding 10 kg originating in Armenia, Brazil and the People’s Republic of China falling within CN code ex76071119 (product concerned).
Glede na zgornje premisleke se sklene, da je zadevni izdelek aluminijasta folija debeline najmanj 0,008 mm in ne več kot 0,018 mm, brez podlage, samo valjana, vendar dalje neobdelana, za zvitke širine največ 650 mm in teže več kot 10 kg s poreklom iz Armenije, Brazilije in Ljudske republike Kitajske („zadevni izdelek“), običajno uvrščena pod oznako KN ex76071119.
The investigation has shown that aluminium foil produced and sold by the Community industry in the Community, aluminium foil produced and sold on the domestic markets of Armenia, Brazil and the PRC and aluminium foil imported into the Community from these countries, as well as those produced and sold in Turkey have essentially the same basic physical and technical characteristics of and the same basic end uses.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo aluminijasta folija, ki jo industrija Skupnosti proizvaja in prodaja v Skupnosti, aluminijasta folija, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na notranjih trgih v Armeniji, Braziliji in LRK, aluminijasta folija, ki se uvaža iz teh držav v Skupnost, ter aluminijasta folija, ki se proizvaja in prodaja v Turčiji, iste osnovne fizikalne in tehnične značilnosti ter iste osnovne končne uporabe.
It is therefore provisionally concluded that these products are alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se začasno sklene, da so si v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe ti izdelki podobni.
MARKET ECONOMY TREATMENT (MET) AND ANALOGUE COUNTRY
TRŽNOGOSPODARSKA OBRAVNAVA (TGO) IN PRIMERLJIVA DRŽAVA
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in Armenia and the PRC, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of the said Article for those producers which were found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe se v protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz Armenije in LRK normalna vrednost določi v skladu z odstavki 1 do 6 navedenega člena za tiste proizvajalce, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
Briefly and for ease of reference only, these criteria are set out in summarised form below:
Ta merila so zaradi boljše preglednosti in v strnjeni obliki opisana spodaj:
firms have one clear set of basic accounting records, which are independently audited in line with international accounting standards and are applied for all purposes,
podjetja imajo jasen seznam osnovnih računovodskih evidenc, ki se neodvisno pregledujejo v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi in se uporabljajo za vse namene,
bankruptcy and property laws guarantee stability and legal certainty, and
stečajno pravo in pravo lastninskih razmerij zagotavljata stabilnost in pravno varnost ter
The sole Armenian cooperating exporting producer and the five exporting producers from the PRC cooperating in this proceeding requested MET and replied to the MET claim form for exporting producers within the given deadlines.
Edini armenski sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik in pet proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK, ki so sodelovali v tem postopku, so zahtevali TGO in v danih rokih izpolnili obrazec zahtevka za TGO.
Armenal, the sole cooperating exporting producer from Armenia claimed that the application of Article 2(7) to Armenia was illegal because Armenia should be considered as having Market Economy Status according to World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules.
Armenal, edini sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik iz Armenije, je trdil, da je uporaba člena 2(7) nezakonita, ker bi se Armeniji moral priznati status tržnega gospodarstva v skladu s pravili Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO).
However the treatment of Armenia as an economy in transition is in accordance with the basic Regulation, which explicitly mentions Armenia in the footnote to Article 2(7)(a).
Vendar je obravnava Armenije kot gospodarstva v prehodu v skladu z osnovno uredbo, v kateri je Armenija izrecno navedena v opombi člena 2(7)(a).
The argument is therefore dismissed.
Ta trditev se zato zavrne.
For all cooperating exporting producers in Armenia and the PRC, the Commission sought all information deemed necessary and verified information submitted in the MET claim at the premises of the companies in question.
Za vse druge sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike v Armeniji in LRK je Komisija zahtevala vse potrebne informacije in v prostorih zadevnega podjetja preverila vse informacije, predložene v zahtevku za TGO.
MET was refused to Armenal on the grounds that criteria 2 and 3 were not met.
TGO se Armenalu ne odobri, ker merili 2 in 3 nista bili izpolnjeni.
For criterion 2, the company’s accounts for 2006 contained an adverse opinion from their auditors, and the company did not provide audited accounts for 2007.
V zvezi z merilom 2 so računovodske evidence družbe za leto 2006 vsebovale negativno mnenje revizorjev, revidiranih računovodskih evidenc za leto 2007 pa družba ni predložila.
The company argued that compliance with the auditing process (which was done in 2006) and a commitment to deliver audited accounts for 2007 in line with international accounting standards (IAS) would be enough to satisfy the requirements of criterion 2.
Družba je trdila, da usklajenost z revizorskim postopkom (opravljenim v letu 2006) in zaveza za oddajo računovodskih evidenc za leto 2007, revidiranih v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi, zadostujeta za izpolnitev zahtev iz merila 2.
Moreover, this company claimed that, even if the auditor delivers an adverse opinion as to the compliance of the accounts with international accounting standards (IAS), the fact that they have been audited in compliance with international auditing standards is enough to meet the requirements of criterion 2.
Poleg tega je ta družba trdila, da že samo dejstvo, da je bila družba revidirana v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi, zadostuje za izpolnitev zahtev iz merila 2, ne glede na to, ali revizor poda negativno mnenje o usklajenosti računovodskih evidenc z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi (MRS).
This argument cannot be accepted.
Te trditve ni mogoče sprejeti.
First their audited accounts for 2007 were not submitted despite being requested by the Commission and second, as for the audited accounts for 2006, it has to be borne in mind that Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation is an exception and, as such, it must be given a strict interpretation.
Prvič, njihove revidirane računovodske evidence za leto 2007 niso bile predložene, kljub temu da jih je Komisija zahtevala, in drugič, treba je upoštevati, da v zvezi z revidiranimi evidencami iz leta 2006 člen 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe predstavlja izjemo, zaradi česar ga je treba ozko razlagati.
It is clear that accounts should not only be audited in line with international auditing standards but also prepared in line with IAS.
Jasno je, da se računovodske evidence ne smejo samo revidirati v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi, ampak morajo biti tudi pripravljene v skladu z MRS.
For criterion 3, the investigation found that the price paid to the State for a substantial percentage of the shares was around one third of its nominal value and the company received the land for free from the State.
V zvezi z merilom 3 je preiskava pokazala, da je cena, plačana državi za znaten odstotek delnic, predstavljala približno eno tretjino svoje normalne vrednosti in da je družba zemljišče brezplačno dobila od države.
It has been claimed that the value at which the shares were acquired was the market value and, in addition the resulting distortions are not significant.
Trdilo se je, da je bila vrednost, po kateri so bile delnice kupljene, tržna vrednost in posledično izkrivljanja niso velika.
Sufficient evidence to justify this claim was however not provided.
Vendar za upravičitev te trditve ni bilo zbranih zadostnih dokazov.
Moreover, the company argued that they cannot sell the land concerned without paying the cadastral value to the State and the impact of owning the land is not significant.
Poleg tega je družba trdila, da ne more prodati zadevnega zemljišča, ne da bi plačala katastrske vrednosti državi, in da lastništvo zemljišča ni pomembno.
This argument cannot be accepted, given that, as indicated above, land is a key asset and has a direct and significant impact on the company’s ability to operate and therefore on its financial situation.
Te utemeljitve ni mogoče sprejeti, ker je, kakor je bilo navedeno zgoraj, zemljišče ključnega pomena in ima neposreden in velik vpliv na delovanje družbe in posledično njeno finančno situacijo.
On the basis of the above, it was therefore considered that MET should be rejected for Rusal Armenal.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega se je zato štelo, da se za družbo Rusal Armenal TGO ne odobri.
The Advisory Committee was consulted and did not object to that conclusion.
Opravljeno je bilo posvetovanje s svetovalnim odborom in ta ugotovitvam ni nasprotoval.
The PRC: Market economy treatment
LRK: tržnogospodarska obravnava
All five of the cooperating exporting producers in the PRC were denied MET on the grounds that the costs of the major input, primary aluminium, did not substantially reflect market values, as required by Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Vsem petim sodelujočim proizvajalcem izvoznikom v LRK se je zahtevek za TGO zavrnil na podlagi utemeljitve, da stroški za glavno surovino, tj. primarni aluminij, niso bistveno odražali tržnih vrednosti, kot zahteva člen 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
The MET investigation determined that this was due to State interference in the aluminium market in the PRC.
Preiskava v zvezi s TGO je pokazala, da je bilo to zaradi vmešavanja države v trg aluminija v LRK.
Prices for primary aluminium are based on the quotation of aluminium in the State-controlled Shanghai Non-ferrous Metal Exchange market (SHFE), limited to Chinese traders, while the worldwide reference is the quotation at the London Metal Exchange (LME).
Cene za primarni aluminij temeljijo na kotaciji aluminija na šanghajski borzi barvnih kovin pod nadzorom države (SHFE), ki je omejena na kitajske trgovce, svetovna referenca pa je kotacija na londonski borzi barvnih kovin (LME).
As a result, the vast majority of primary aluminium production is sold in the Chinese market causing a depression of the domestic primary aluminium price and an important cost advantage for producers of aluminium foil established in the PRC.
Zato se velik del proizvodnje primarnega aluminija proda na kitajskem trgu, kar povzroča znižanje cen domačega primarnega aluminija in pomembno stroškovno prednost za proizvajalce aluminijaste folije v LRK.
Bearing in mind that primary aluminium accounts for ca. 70 % of the cost of production of aluminium foil, this difference is translated into a ca. 14 % cost advantage for Chinese producers, which is significant in a commodity market like that for aluminium foil.
Če se upošteva, da primarni aluminij predstavlja približno 70 % proizvodnih stroškov aluminijaste folije, je ta razlika enaka približno 14 % stroškovne prednosti za kitajske proizvajalce, kar je veliko za blagovno borzo, kot je borza za aluminijasto folijo.
Moreover, in addition to the general situation described above, three other companies do not fill other requirements of criterion 1.
Poleg zgoraj opisane splošne situacije še tri druge družbe ne izpolnjujejo drugih zahtev merila 1.
One of them is subject to significant State interference in relation to important business decisions; one received a large subsidy in the purchase of its main equipment; and the fixed assets of a third company did not reflect market values.
V pomembne poslovne odločitve ene izmed njih se močno vmešava država, ena je prejela veliko podporo za nakup glavne opreme, osnovna sredstva tretje družbe pa niso odražala tržnih vrednosti.
One company did not comply with criterion 2 as clear accounting errors were found that had not been commented upon by the auditors.
Ena družba ni izpolnjevala merila 2, saj so bile najdene računovodske napake, o katerih revizorji niso dali mnenja.
Concerning criterion 3, two companies did not fulfil its requirements.
Družbi nista izpolnili zahtev merila 3. Pri eni družbi so izkrivljanja vplivala na pravico do rabe zemljišč.
In the case of one company, distortions affected their land use rights: when the company changed its legal form in 1993 it did not transfer the land use rights straight away to the new entity as would be standard practice.
Ko je ta družba leta 1993 spremenila pravno obliko, ni prenesla pravic do rabe zemljišča na novo pravno osebo, kot je stalna praksa.
In fact the land use rights were not transferred until 10 years later.
Pravice do rabe zemljišča so bile prenesene 10 let pozneje.
There was no penalty clause in the contract in case of failure to transfer the deeds.
Pogodba ni imela člena o pogodbeni kazni za primer, da ne pride do prenosa listin.
Furthermore, during the year 2004, they did not pre-pay income tax either in the quarter required or at the end of the year.
Poleg tega družba v letu 2004 ni vnaprej plačala davka od dohodka, ne v zahtevanem četrtletju ne na koncu leta.