natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is common practice in anti-dumping investigations that the Commission excludes producers that failed to cooperate for the purpose of the assessment of injury and not to use facts available in line with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
V protidampinških preiskavah je običajno, da Komisija iz ocene škode izključi proizvajalce, ki niso sodelovali, in ne uporabi dostopnih dejstev na podlagi člena 18 osnovne uredbe.
The data concerning injury cover an extended period of four years and it is not possible to obtain based on public sources all the necessary information to establish all injury indicators for the whole period.
Podatki v zvezi s škodo zajemajo obdobje štirih let, pri čemer iz javnih virov ni mogoče pridobiti vseh potrebnih informacij za določitev vseh kazalnikov škode za celotno obdobje.
In this particular case, the said Community producer was excluded from the investigation because it had failed to provide complete meaningful information for the years 2004 to 2006 and it only provided partial information for 2007 and the IP.
Navedeni proizvajalec Skupnosti je bil v tem posebnem primeru izključen iz preiskave, ker ni zagotovil popolnih in bistvenih informacij za leta od 2004 do 2006, ampak je predložil le delne informacije za leto 2007 in OP.
Using the public information for this producer's biodiesel activity for 2007 and 2008, would not have allowed to obtain data for all injury factors and for all the years of the period considered.
Uporaba javno dostopnih informacij o proizvodnji biodizla tega proizvajalca le za leti 2007 in 2008 ne bi omogočila pridobitve podatkov za vse dejavnike škode in vsa leta obravnavanega obdobja.
This would have distorted the trends which are relevant for the assessment of injury.
To bi izkrivilo trende, ki so pomembni za oceno škode.
Moreover, maintaining the said producer in the sample would have not allowed the assessment of undercutting to be made for the totality of the sales of the sampled producers as the said company did not provide a listing with its detailed sales by product type for the IP.
Poleg tega ohranitev navedenega proizvajalca v vzorcu ne bi omogočila ocene nelojalnega nižanja cen za vso prodajo vzorčenih proizvajalcev, ker navedena družba za obdobje preiskave ni predložila seznama s podrobnimi podatki o prodaji glede na vrsto izdelka.
Finally, it is noteworthy that contrary to the claim made by the interested party, the financial performance of the said producer, in terms of profitability as shown in its publicly available data, was well below the average profitability established for the cooperating sampled Community producers as shown in Table 7 of the provisional Regulation.
Nazadnje je treba omeniti, da so bili finančni rezultati navedenega proizvajalca glede dobičkonosnosti, kakor je razvidno iz javno dostopnih podatkov, v nasprotju s trditvijo zainteresirane stranke dosti slabši od povprečne dobičkonosnosti, ugotovljene za sodelujoče vzorčene proizvajalce Skupnosti, kot je prikazano v preglednici 7 začasne uredbe.
In the absence of any other comments recitals (62) to (64) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s tem ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave od (62) do (64) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
As mentioned in recital (16) above, the examination of the trends concerning the assessment of injury covered the period from January 2004 to the end of the IP.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (16) zgoraj, je proučitev trendov v zvezi z oceno škode zajela obdobje od januarja 2004 do konca OP.
It was, thus, considered more appropriate to make an analysis on the possible injury and the economic situation of the Community industry based on trends for the period 2005 to the IP (‘period analysed’).
Zato se je zdelo ustrezneje, da se analiza mogoče škode in gospodarskega položaja industrije Skupnosti opravi na podlagi trendov za obdobje od leta 2005 do OP (v nadaljnjem besedilu: analizirano obdobje).
As no party commented on this approach, recital (65) of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Ker ni nobena stranka predložila pripomb k temu pristopu, se uvodna izjava (65) začasne uredbe potrdi.
In the absence of any comments that could justify a change concerning the Community consumption as shown in the above table, recitals (66) to (71) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb, ki bi lahko upravičile spremembo v zvezi s potrošnjo Skupnosti, kot je prikazana v zgornji preglednici, se uvodne izjave od (66) do (71) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Source: US export statistics.
Vir: statistični podatki ZDA o izvozu
For the purpose of the definitive findings it was found that one US exporting producer was found not to be dumping its products on the Community market, hence the total volume and price of dumped imports had to be reassessed.
Za namen dokončnih ugotovitev je bilo ugotovljeno, da eden od ameriških proizvajalcev izvoznikov svojih izdelkov na trgu Skupnosti ni prodajal po dampinških cenah, zato je bilo treba celoten obseg in ceno dampinškega uvoza znova oceniti.
In this case, when using sampling to establish dumping it is the Commission practice to then examine whether there is positive evidence showing whether or not all the companies which were not sampled were effectively dumping their products on the Community market during the IP.
V tem primeru, ko se za ugotovitev dampinga uporablja vzorčenje, je praksa Komisije, da nato prouči, ali obstajajo jasni dokazi o tem, ali so vse družbe, ki niso bile vzorčene, v OP dejansko izvajale damping svojih izdelkov na trgu Skupnosti ali ne.
To this end, the export prices charged by the cooperating exporting producers not included in the sample and the export prices of the non-cooperating exporters were investigated on the basis of US export statistics, the questionnaire responses of the sampled exporting producers in the USA and the replies to the sampling forms provided by all the cooperating companies in the USA.
V ta namen so bile preverjene izvozne cene, ki jih zaračunavajo sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki, ki niso vključeni v vzorec, ter izvozne cene nesodelujočih izvoznikov, in sicer na podlagi statističnih podatkov ZDA o izvozu, izpolnjenih vprašalnikov vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz ZDA in izpolnjenih obrazcev za vzorčenje, ki so jih predložile vse sodelujoče družbe iz ZDA.
It was considered that by adding the average dumping margin found on the basis of the sampled exporting producers to the average export prices established for the sampled exporting producers found to be dumping, the level of non-dumped export prices for the product concerned would be set.
Štelo se je, da se stopnja nedampinških izvoznih cen za zadevni izdelek določi tako, da se povprečna stopnja dampinga, ugotovljena na podlagi vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, prišteje k povprečnim izvoznim cenam, izračunanim za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izvajajo damping.
The export price was established for the non-sampled exporting producers on the basis of the US export statistics after deducting the exports data concerning the sampled exporting producers.
Izvozna cena za nevzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike je bila določena na podlagi statističnih podatkov ZDA o izvozu, potem ko so bili izvzeti podatki o izvozu za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike.
The resulting price was then compared with the non-dumped export price.
Dobljena cena se je nato primerjala z nedampinško izvozno ceno.
This price comparison showed that both i) the cooperating exporting producers which were not included in the sample and ii) the exporting producers which did not cooperate in the investigation had average export prices which were in all cases below the average non-dumped prices established for the sampled exporting producers.
Ta primerjava cen je pokazala, da so i) sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki, ki niso bili vključeni v vzorec, in ii) proizvajalci izvozniki, ki niso sodelovali v preiskavi, imeli povprečne izvozne cene, ki so bile v vseh primerih nižje od povprečnih nedampinških cen, izračunanih za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike.
This was sufficient indication that the imports from all companies that were not sampled, namely the cooperating and non-cooperating ones, could be considered as being dumped.
To je bil zadosten dokaz, da se uvoz od vseh družb, ki niso bile vzorčene, in sicer sodelujočih in nesodelujočih, lahko šteje za dampinški uvoz.
Concerning the non-sampled companies, the information available and the data submitted concerning their export price did not show that their prices were above the non-dumped price established as explained in recital (84) above.
Kar zadeva nevzorčene družbe, razpoložljive informacije in predloženi podatki o njihovi izvozni ceni niso pokazali, da bi bile njihove cene višje od ugotovljene nedampinške cene, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (84) zgoraj.
As mentioned in recital (83) above, it was found at the definitive stage that one exporting producer in the USA included in the sample was not dumping its products on the Community market.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (83) zgoraj, je bilo v dokončni fazi ugotovljeno, da eden od proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz ZDA, ki je bil vključen v vzorec, svojih proizvodov na trgu Skupnosti ni prodajal po dampinških cenah.
Accordingly, its exports were excluded from the analysis concerning the development of dumped imports on the Community market.
V skladu s tem je bil njegov izvoz izključen iz analize razvoja dampinškega uvoza na trg Skupnosti.
However, in order to avoid any possibility of disclosing sensitive business data pertaining to the said producer, it was considered appropriate for confidentiality reasons not to present publicly available data, such as the US export statistics, excluding the data of the exporter not found to be dumping on the Community market.
Da bi se izognili kakršni koli možnosti za razkritje občutljivih poslovnih podatkov o navedenem proizvajalcu, se je zaradi zaupnosti zdelo primerno, da se javno dostopni podatki, kot so statistični podatki ZDA o izvozu, ne predložijo, razen podatki o izvozniku, za katerega je bilo ugotovljeno, da ne izvaja dampinga na trgu Skupnosti.
Therefore, the table below comprises all imports of biodiesel originating in the USA which were found or considered to be dumped on the Community market during the period considered in an indexed form.
Zato je v spodnji preglednici v indeksirani obliki naveden celotni uvoz biodizla s poreklom iz ZDA, za katerega je bil med obravnavanim obdobjem pri uvozu na trg Skupnosti ugotovljen damping ali pa se je ta uvoz štel za dampinškega.
Source: US export statistics and replies to sampling forms of non-dumping US companies.
Vir: statistični podatki ZDA o izvozu in odgovori ameriških družb, ki ne izvajajo dampinga, na obrazce za vzorčenje
Dumped imports from USA
Dampinški uvoz iz ZDA
Indexed volumes 2005=100
Indeksirani obseg 2005 = 100
Index market share 2005=100
Indeksirani tržni delež 2005 = 100
One interested party claimed that the injury and causation analysis of the anti-dumping proceeding should be made on different data than that made in the parallel anti-subsidy proceeding.
Ena od zainteresiranih strank je trdila, da je treba škodo in vzročno zvezo v protidampinškem postopku analizirati na podlagi drugačnih podatkov kot v vzporednem protisubvencijskem postopku.
It was argued that the dumping findings, in particular the export sales to the Community, are based only on the own produced biodiesel of the sampled producers whereas the subsidy findings are based on i) own produced, ii) produced and blended and iii) purchased and blended biodiesel exported to the Community.
Trdila je, da ugotovitve o dampingu, zlasti glede izvozne prodaje v Skupnost, temeljijo le na biodizlu, ki so ga vzorčeni proizvajalci proizvedli sami, medtem ko ugotovitve o subvencioniranju temeljijo na biodizlu, ki se izvaža v Skupnost in ga proizvajalci i) proizvajajo sami, ii) proizvajajo in mešajo ter iii) kupujejo in mešajo.
However, at provisional stage it was found that all the exports of the companies included in the sample of US producers were made at dumped prices in the Community market.
Vendar je bilo v začasni fazi ugotovljeno, da je izvoz vseh družb, vključenih v vzorec ameriških proizvajalcev, na trg Skupnosti potekal po dampinških cenah.
A similar finding was made in the anti-subsidy investigation.
Podobna ugotovitev je bila sprejeta v protisubvencijski preiskavi.
The fact that, as explained in recital (83) above, at definitive stage, one sampled US company was found not to be dumping has now led to a discrepancy between the volume of dumped imports and the volume of subsidized imports to be considered in the injury and causation analysis of the proceedings.
Dejstvo, da je bilo v dokončni fazi ugotovljeno, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (83) zgoraj, da ena od vzorčenih ameriških družb ni izvajala dampinga, je povzročilo neskladnost med obsegom dampinškega uvoza in obsegom subvencioniranega uvoza, ki se upoštevata pri analizi škode in vzročne zveze v postopku.
The overall volume of dumped imports from the USA was adjusted to take into account the fact that the imports of one sampled exporting producer were found not to be dumped.
Celoten obseg dampinškega uvoza iz ZDA se je prilagodil, da se upošteva ugotovitev, da eden od vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov zadevnega izdelka ni izvažal po dampinških cenah.
One interested party claimed that the HTS heading 3824 90 of the US export statistics which was used in the provisional Regulation to establish the imports from the country concerned would also cover, in addition to biodiesel, other products such as ‘fatty substances of animal or vegetable origin and mixtures thereof’.
Ena od zainteresiranih strank je trdila, da oznaka HTS 3824 90 iz statističnih podatkov ZDA o izvozu, ki se je uporabila v začasni uredbi za ugotovitev uvoza iz zadevne države, poleg biodizla vključuje tudi druge izdelke, kot so „živalske ali rastlinske maščobe in njihove mešanice“.
In this regard, it is firstly noted that the US HTS code 3824 90 4000 was used in order to compute the import volumes originating in the USA and not the six-digit HTS heading claimed by this party.
V zvezi s tem se najprej opozarja, da je bila za izračun obsega uvoza s poreklom iz ZDA uporabljena ameriška oznaka HTS 3824 90 4000 in ne šestmestna oznaka HTS, kot je trdila ta stranka.
Moreover, it is recalled that as mentioned in recital (68) of the provisional Regulation, Eurostat data could not be used for the purpose of assessing the imports of biodiesel from the USA because until the end of 2007 there was no distinct CN code available for the customs classification of that product.
Treba je spomniti, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (68) začasne uredbe, da se podatki Eurostata niso mogli uporabiti za oceno uvoza biodizla iz ZDA, ker do konca leta 2007 ni bilo ločene oznake KN, ki bi bila na voljo kot carinska oznaka za ta izdelek.
The comparison of the Table 4 above with Table 2 would demonstrate that the Commission's assessment of the import volumes of the product concerned over the analysis period was more conservative than the one that could have been alternatively used.
Primerjava preglednice 4 zgoraj in preglednice 2 kaže, da je bila ocena Komisije glede obsega uvoza zadevnega izdelka v analiziranem obdobju previdnejša kot tista, ki bi se sicer lahko uporabila.
Moreover, this overall picture of the import volumes of Table 4 is compiled from confidential data not susceptible to disclosure whereas the USA statistics is publicly available information.
Poleg tega je ta splošni pregled obsega uvoza v preglednici 4 sestavljen iz zaupnih podatkov, ki jih ni dovoljeno razkriti, medtem ko so statistični podatki ZDA javno dostopne informacije.
The comparison of Table 5 with Table 2 above would demonstrate very similar trends between the method used by the Commission and the one proposed by this party.
Primerjava preglednice 5 s preglednico 2 kaže, da bi bilo gibanje, dobljeno z metodo, ki jo je uporabila Komisija, zelo podobno gibanju na podlagi metode, ki jo je predlagala ta stranka.
The same interested party also claimed that, because the product concerned is biodiesel and blends of biodiesel with a biodiesel content above 20 %, the volume of imports shown in Table 2 above could not correlate with the correct import volume for the product concerned.
Ista zainteresirana stranka je trdila tudi, da se obseg uvoza, prikazan v preglednici 2 zgoraj, ne ujema s pravilnim obsegom uvoza za zadevni izdelek, ker zadevni izdelek pomeni biodizel in mešanice z vsebnostjo biodizla nad 20 %.
In this regard it is noted that the investigation has not identified any imports of the product concerned with a biodiesel content above B20 but below B99 during the IP.
V zvezi s tem se ugotavlja, da v preiskavi za OP ni bil ugotovljen noben uvoz zadevnega izdelka z vsebnostjo biodizla nad B20, a pod B99.
In other words the investigation has not identified any imports of the product concerned that because of their low biodiesel content would be classified under a different US HTS code.
Z drugimi besedami, s preiskavo ni bil ugotovljen noben uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki bi bil zaradi majhne vsebnosti biodizla v zadevnem izdelku uvrščen pod drugo ameriško oznako HTS.
In addition the same party and the USG claimed that contrary to what was stated in recitals (77) and (80) of the provisional Regulation all exports from the USA are not deemed to be originating in the USA.
Poleg tega sta ista stranka in ameriška vlada trdili, da se v nasprotju z navedbami iz uvodnih izjav (77) in (80) začasne uredbe šteje, da ni ves izvoz iz ZDA tudi izvoz s poreklom iz ZDA.
The same party also stated that the origin regulations established by the US Census Bureau regarding the determination of the origin of the exported goods are not widely known to the biodiesel industry and therefore the exporters of biodiesel when filling out the ‘Shipper's Export Declaration’ (SED) normally indicate that the goods exported are of domestic origin.
Ista stranka je navedla tudi, da predpisi glede porekla, ki jih je določila ameriška vladna agencija Census Bureau v zvezi z ugotavljanjem porekla izvoženega blaga, niso splošno znani v industriji biodizla, zato izvozniki biodizla pri izpolnjevanju izvozne deklaracije odpremnika (Shipper's Export Declaration) običajno navedejo, da je izvoženo blago domačega porekla.
Moreover, this assumption is rather simplistic as it does not take into account the quantities of biodiesel blended in the USA and exported to the Community in which i) the characteristics of the blends are different from those of the input materials which would confer US origin to the blended product or ii) blends in which the proportion of US origin biodiesel being the dominant one would confer US origin to the whole blended product.
Poleg tega je ta predpostavka precej poenostavljena, saj v njej niso upoštevane količine biodizla, ki se mešajo v ZDA in izvažajo v Skupnost v mešanicah, ki imajo kot celota poreklo iz ZDA zaradi dejstva, i) ker ima mešanica drugačne lastnosti kot vhodni materiali, ki jo sestavljajo, ali ii) ker je glavni sestavni del mešanic biodizel ameriškega porekla.
It is recalled in this respect that, as mentioned in recital (78) of the provisional Regulation, the US companies investigated declared that it was not possible to differentiate in the quantities exported to the Community or sold on the domestic market the quantities own produced or sourced in the USA or those imported.
V zvezi s tem je treba spomniti, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (78) začasne uredbe, na navedbo ameriških družb, ki se preiskujejo, da pri količinah, izvoženih v Skupnost ali prodanih na notranjem trgu, ni bilo mogoče razlikovati med količinami, proizvedenimi v ZDA ali s poreklom iz ZDA, in uvoženimi količinami.
The table below shows the unit selling price of all imports into the Community market originating in the USA during the period considered as ascertained in recitals (81) and (82) of the provisional Regulation.
V spodnji preglednici je prikazana prodajna cena na enoto za ves uvoz na trg Skupnosti s poreklom iz ZDA v obravnavanem obdobju, kot je določeno v uvodnih izjavah (81) in (82) začasne uredbe.
In view of the definitive findings concerning dumping, and the fact that one company was found not to be dumping its products on the Community market, the unit selling prices of dumped imports into the Community market were calculated separately and are presented in the following table.
Ob upoštevanju končnih ugotovitev o dampingu in dejstva, da je bilo za eno družbo ugotovljeno, da svojih izdelkov na trgu Skupnosti ni prodajala po dampinških cenah, so se prodajne cene na enoto za dampinški uvoz na trg Skupnosti izračunale ločeno in so navedene v naslednji preglednici.
Source: US export statistics and questionnaire replies of the sampled dumping US exporters.
Vir: statistični podatki ZDA o izvozu in izpolnjeni vprašalniki vzorčenih ameriških izvoznikov, ki izvajajo damping
Average prices for imports from the USA fluctuated during the period considered and overall showed an increase of 6 % between 2005 and the IP.
Povprečne cene za uvoz iz ZDA so v obravnavanem obdobju nihale in so se med letom 2005 in OP skupno povečale za 6 %.
An adjustment for the customs duties, post-importation costs and for the differences in feedstock used for the production of biodiesel was applied where appropriate as described in recital (84) of the provisional Regulation.
Carine, stroški po uvozu in razlike v surovinah, ki se uporabljajo za proizvodnjo biodizla, so se po potrebi prilagodili, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi (84) začasne uredbe.
Moreover, the price quotations at Community level would have been an inappropriate basis for this adjustment as these price levels would have been influenced by the price levels of the dumped imports originating in the USA.
Poleg tega bi bile navedbe cen na ravni Skupnosti neustrezna podlaga za to prilagoditev, saj bi na te ravni cen vplivale ravni cen dampinškega uvoza s poreklom iz ZDA.
On the basis of the above, the average price undercutting margin in the IP, expressed as a percentage of the Community industry's weighted average ex-work prices, was found to range from 18,9 % to 31,9 %, instead of a range from 18,9 % to 33,0 % at provisional stage.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je povprečna stopnja nelojalno znižane cene v OP, izražena kot odstotek tehtanih povprečnih cen franko tovarna v industriji Skupnosti, nihala od 18,9 % do 31,9 %, medtem ko je bil v začasni fazi ta razpon od 18,9 % do 33,0 %.
As mentioned in recitals (107) to (110) of the provisional Regulation, it was found that the Community industry suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah od (107) do (110) začasne uredbe, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je industrija Skupnosti utrpela znatno škodo v smislu člena 3(5) osnovne uredbe.
Notwithstanding the Community industry's ability to raise capital for investments, return on investments declined dramatically during the IP and profitability declined significantly over the period considered.
Kljub zmožnosti industrije Skupnosti, da zbere kapital za naložbe, se je med OP donosnost naložb močno zmanjšala, prav tako pa se je v obravnavanem obdobju znatno zmanjšala dobičkonosnost.
One interested party claimed that the analysis made in recital (93) of the provisional Regulation regarding the growth of the Community industry was incorrect.
Ena od zainteresiranih strank je trdila, da je bila analiza iz uvodne izjave (93) začasne uredbe v zvezi z rastjo industrije Skupnosti nepravilna.
The same party further argued that the injury factors mentioned in the same recital (93) of the provisional Regulation, namely production, utilisation of production capacity, productivity, sales, investment policy, return on investments, cannot be considered as severely affected.
Ista stranka je trdila tudi, da ni mogoče govoriti o resnem vplivu na dejavnike škode, navedene v isti uvodni izjavi (93) začasne uredbe, to so proizvodnja, stopnja izkoriščenosti proizvodne zmogljivosti, produktivnost, prodaja, naložbena politika in donosnost naložb.