natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
CIPAC-No.: not attributed yet
Št. CIPAC: še ni dodeljena
of 11 March 2010
z dne 11. marca 2010
excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
o izključitvi nekaterih odhodkov držav članic iz naslova Jamstvenega oddelka Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (EKUJS), Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada (EKJS) in Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) iz financiranja Evropske unije
(notified under document C(2010) 1317)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 1317)
(Only the Bulgarian, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovak, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v angleškem, bolgarskem, danskem, estonskem, finskem, francoskem, grškem, italijanskem, madžarskem, nemškem, nizozemskem, poljskem, portugalskem, slovaškem, španskem in švedskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Under Article 7(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999, and Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, the Commission is to carry out the necessary verifications, communicate to the Member States the results of these verifications, take note of the comments of the Member States, initiate a bilateral discussion so that an agreement may be reached with the Member States in question, and formally communicate its conclusions to them.
V skladu s členom 7(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1258/1999 in členom 31 Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 mora Komisija opraviti potrebna preverjanja, državam članicam sporočiti rezultate teh preverjanj, upoštevati opažanja držav članic, začeti dvostranske razprave za dosego morebitnega dogovora z zadevnimi državami članicami in slednjim uradno sporočiti svoje sklepne ugotovitve.
That opportunity has been used in some cases and the reports issued on the outcome have been examined by the Commission.
Ta možnost je bila v nekaterih primerih uporabljena in Komisija je pregledala poročila, ki so bila sestavljena ob koncu postopka.
Under Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, only agricultural expenditure which has been incurred in a way that has not infringed European Union rules may be financed.
V skladu z uredbama (ES) št. 1258/1999 in (ES) št. 1290/2005 se lahko financirajo samo kmetijski odhodki, ki so nastali skladno s predpisi Evropske unije.
The amounts that are not recognised as being chargeable to the EAGGF Guarantee Section, the EAGF and the EAFRD should be indicated.
Navesti je treba zneske, ki se ne pokrivajo iz Jamstvenega oddelka EKUJS, EKJS in EKSRP.
As regards the cases covered by this Decision, the assessment of the amounts to be excluded on grounds of non-compliance with European Union rules was notified by the Commission to the Member States in a summary report on the subject.
V primerih, na katere se nanaša ta sklep, je Komisija državam članicam v zbirnem poročilu sporočila oceno zneskov, ki bodo zaradi neskladnosti s predpisi Evropske unije izključeni.
This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgments of the Court of Justice in cases pending on 30 September 2009 and relating to its content,
Ta sklep ne vpliva na finančne posledice, ki bi jih Komisija lahko sprejela na podlagi sodb Sodišča v zadevah, ki so 30. septembra 2009 še nerešene in se nanašajo na zadeve iz tega sklepa –
The expenditure itemised in the Annex hereto that has been incurred by the Member States’ accredited paying agencies and declared under the EAGGF Guarantee Section, under the EAGF or under the EAFRD shall be excluded from European Union financing because it does not comply with European Union rules.
V Prilogi navedeni odhodki pooblaščenih plačilnih agencij držav članic, prijavljeni v okviru Jamstvenega oddelka EKUJS, EKJS ali EKSRP, so izključeni iz financiranja Evropske unije, ker niso skladni s predpisi Evropske unije.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Kraljevino Belgijo, Republiko Bolgarijo, Kraljevino Dansko, Zvezno republiko Nemčijo, Republiko Estonijo, Irsko, Helensko republiko, Kraljevino Španijo, Francosko republiko, Italijansko republiko, Republiko Ciper, Veliko vojvodstvo Luksemburg, Republiko Madžarsko, Kraljevino Nizozemsko, Republiko Poljsko, Portugalsko republiko, Slovaško republiko, Republiko Finsko, Kraljevino Švedsko ter Združeno kraljestvo Velika Britanija in Severna Irska.
Done at Brussels, 11 March 2010.
V Bruslju, 11. marca 2010
BUDGET ITEM 6701
PRORAČUNSKA POSTAVKA 6701
Overshooting of financial ceilings
Prekoračitev zgornjih finančnih mej.
one-off
enkratni
Financial audit — payment deadlines
Finančna revizija – plačilni roki
Non-respect of payment deadlines
Neupoštevanje plačilnih rokov.
Total BG
Skupaj BG
Law quality and incorrect timing of on-the-spot checks, deficiencies in GAEC criteria controls Weak general control environment
Slaba kakovost in nepravilna časovna razporeditev pregledov na kraju samem, pomanjkljivosti pri kontrolah meril GAEC. Pomanjkljivo splošno okolje kontroliranja.
Wrong application of reductions and exclusions
Napačna uporaba znižanj in izključitev.
Cross Compliance
Navzkrižna skladnost
Insufficient quantity and quality of key and ancillary controls
Nezadostni količina in kakovost ključnih in pomožnih pregledov.
Compensation following adjustments made by the MS in annual declarations
Nadomestila po prilagoditvah v letnih poročilih s strani držav članic.
Insufficient quantity of on-the-spot checks
Nezadostna količina pregledov na kraju samem.
Non-respect of definition of suckler cow
Neupoštevanje opredelitve krave dojilje.
Total DK (EUR)
Skupaj DK (EUR)
Total DK (DKK)
Skupaj DK (DKK)
Total EE
Skupaj EE
Unrecoverable debt
Neizterljiv dolg.
Lack of on-the-spot checks
Pomanjkanje pregledov na kraju samem.
Ineligible expenditure, milk levy and failure to repay amounts due to cross-compliance
Neupravičeni izdatki, prelevmani na mleko in nevračilo zneskov na podlagi navzkrižne skladnosti.
Fruit and Vegetables — Operational Programmes
Sadje in zelenjava – operativni programi
Ineligible cost of environmental management of packaging
Neupravičeni stroški okoljskega ravnanja z embalažo.
Fruit and Vegetables — Producer Groups
Sadje in zelenjava – skupine proizvajalcev
Weaknesses in the key control (insufficient checks on double funding)
Pomanjkljivosti pri ključnem pregledu (nezadostna preverjanja dvojnega financiranja).
Hemp — production aid
Konoplja – pomoč za pridelavo
Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-259/05
Povračilo na podlagi sodbe Sodišča v zadevi T-259/05.
Debts management: non-recovery of debts
Upravljanje dolgov: neizterjava dolgov.
Overshooting of ceilings
Prekoračitev zgornjih mej.
Most likely error
Najverjetneje napaka.
Systematic error
Sistematična napaka.
Insufficient quantity of samples taken and low quality of their examination
Nezadostno število vzetih vzorcev in slaba kakovost njihovih pregledov.
Ineligible cost of environmental management of packaging Personnel costs too high Insufficient justification for specific costs of certified plants
Previsoki stroški dela. Nezadostna utemeljitev določenih stroškov certificiranih rastlin.
Weaknes on the application of sanctions at national level
Pomanjkljivosti pri uporabi sankcij na nacionalni ravni.
Very weak control environment and absence of the suckler cow status of the herd
Zelo pomanjkljivo okolje kontroliranja, brez statusa krave dojilje za čredo.
Very weak control environment
Zelo pomanjkljivo okolje kontroliranja.
Incorrect application of reductions and exclusions
Nepravilna uporaba znižanj in izključitev.
Rural Development EAGGF Axis 2
Razvoj podeželja EKUJS Os 2
Weaknesses in key checks and in adminitrative controls Insufficient checks of GAEC criteria and cross-checks with animal database
Pomanjkljivosti pri ključnih pregledih in upravnih nadzorih. Nezadostne kontrole meril GAEC in nezadostna navzkrižna preverjanja z zbirko podatkov za živali.
Total GB (GBP)
Skupaj GB (GBP)
Total GB (EUR)
Skupaj GB (EUR)
Ineligible costs resulting from late withdrawals and late distribution
Neupravičeni stroški zaradi poznih umikov in pozne razdelitve.
Ineligible costs of storage resulting from late withdrawals
Neupravičeni stroški skladiščenja zaradi poznih umikov.
Value of Marketed Production (VMP), used for calculating Community aid, wrongly established
Vrednost tržne proizvodnje (VTP), ki se uporablja za izračun pomoči Skupnosti, je narobe določena.
Weak control system.
Slab nadzorni sistem.
Deficiencies in the control of area and environmental measures
Pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru območja in okoljskih ukrepov.
Overshooting the production quantities permitted by the Regulations
Prekoračitev proizvodnih količin, ki so dovoljene v skladu z uredbami.
Olive Oil — Consumption Aid
Oljčno olje – pomoč za porabo
Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-243/05
Povračilo na podlagi sodbe Sodišča v zadevi T-243/05.
RD Guarantee (area related measures)
Razvoj podeželja, jamstva (ukrepi v zvezi s površino)
Persistent weaknesses in IACS system.
Stalne pomanjkljivosti sistema IAKS.
Deficiencies in control reports.
Pomanjkljivosti poročil o nadzoru.
Delayed performance of on-the-spot checks
Pozna izvedba pregledov na kraju samem.
RD Guarantee new measures
Razvoj podeželja, jamstva, novi ukrepi
Rural Development Guarantee
Razvoj podeželja, jamstvo
Reimbursement due to double correction (under Commission Decision 2009/721/EC and recovery order GFO.09.025 concerning TRDI program 2004HU06GDO001)
Povračilo zaradi dvojnega popravka (na podlagi Odločbe Komisije 2009/721/ES in naloga za izterjavo GFO.09.025 v zvezi s programom TRDI 2004HU06GDO001).
Non-application of aid reductions towards farmers lodging their aid applications after deadline
Neuporaba znižanj pomoči za kmete, ki vloge za pomoč vložijo po izteku roka.
Ineligible expenditure
Neupravičeni izdatki.
Lack of adminitrative controls concerning retention period.
Pomanjkanje upravnih nadzorov v zvezi z obdobjem obvezne reje.
Lack of on-the-spot controls.
Pomanjkanje pregledov na kraju samem.
Inappropriate calculation of sanctions
Neustrezen izračun sankcij.
Tested population errors
Napake pri testiranih populacijah.
Insuficient number of sustitution checks performed
Nezadostno število opravljenih nadomestnih pregledov.
Weaknesses in the management of the herd registers and of the supporting documents
Pomanjkljivosti pri vodenju registrov živali in spremnih dokumentov.
Land parcel system not completely vectorised.
Sistem zemljiških parcel ni v celoti vektoriziran.
Acceptance of ineligible land for payments.
Sprejetje neupravičenih zemljišč za plačila.
Too low number of on-the-spot checks in regions with high error rates.
Premajhno število pregledov na kraju samem v regijah z visokimi stopnjami napak.
Erroneous application of provisions of intentional non-compliance
Napačna uporaba določb o namerni neskladnosti.
Total PL (PLN)
Skupaj PL (PLN)
Total PL (EUR)
Skupaj PL (EUR)
Total SE (SEK)
Skupaj SE (SEK)
Total SE (EUR)
Skupaj SE (EUR)
BUDGET ITEM 6500
PRORAČUNSKA POSTAVKA 6500
RD Guarantee (programme 2004 SK 06 GDO 001)
Razvoj podeželja, jamstvo (program 2004 SK 06 GDO 001)
Incorrect control procedure resulting in insufficient controls within chosen samples
Nepravilni nadzorni postopek in posledično nezadostni nadzori pri izbranih vzorcih.
Total SK
Skupaj SK
Rural Development Programme 2007UK06RPO001
Razvoj podeželja, program 2007 UK 06 RPO 001
BUDGET ITEM 05 07 01 07
PRORAČUNSKA POSTAVKA 05 07 01 07
Total HU (EUR)
Skupaj HU (EUR)
Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-50/07
Povračilo na podlagi sodbe Sodišča v zadevi T-50/07.
Flax — Production Aid
Lan – pomoč za pridelavo
Reimbursement following judgment of Court of Justice in the case T-183/06
Povračilo na podlagi sodbe Sodišča v zadev T-183/06.
prolonging the validity of Decision 2009/251/EC requiring Member States to ensure that products containing the biocide dimethylfumarate are not placed or made available on the market
o podaljšanju veljavnosti Odločbe Komisije 2009/251/ES o zahtevi, da države članice zagotovijo, da se proizvodi, ki vsebujejo biocid dimetil fumarat, ne dajo na trg ali na njem niso dostopni
(notified under document C(2010) 1337)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 1337)
Commission Decision 2009/251/EC [2] requires Member States to ensure that products containing the biocide dimethylfumarate (DMF) are not placed or made available on the market.
Odločba Komisije 2009/251/ES [2] zahteva, da države članice zagotovijo, da se proizvodi, ki vsebujejo biocid dimetil fumarat, ne dajo na trg ali na njem niso dostopni.
Decision 2009/251/EC was adopted in accordance with the provisions of Article 13 of Directive 2001/95/EC, which restricts the validity of the Decision to a period not exceeding 1 year, but allows it to be confirmed for additional periods none of which shall exceed 1 year.
Odločba 2009/251/ES je bila sprejeta v skladu z določbami člena 13 Direktive 2001/95/ES, ki omejuje veljavnost Odločbe na največ eno leto, a dopušča njeno podaljšanje za dodatna obdobja, ki pa ne smejo biti daljša od enega leta.
In the light of the experience acquired so far and the absence of a permanent measure addressing consumer products containing DMF, it is necessary to prolong the validity of Decision 2009/251/EC for 12 months and to amend it accordingly.
Na podlagi pridobljenih izkušenj in ker ni trajnega ukrepa za ravnanje s potrošnikom namenjenimi proizvodi, ki vsebujejo dimetil fumarat, je treba podaljšati veljavnost Odločbe 2009/251/ES za dvanajst mesecev in jo ustrezno spremeniti.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Directive 2001/95/EC,
Ukrepi, predvideni s tem sklepom, so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega z Direktivo 2001/95/ES –
The text of Article 4 of Decision 2009/251/EC is replaced by the following:
Besedilo člena 4 Sklepa 2009/251/ES se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘This Decision shall be applicable until 15 March 2011.’
„Ta sklep se uporablja do 15. marca 2011.“
Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with this Decision by 15 March 2010 at the latest and shall publish those measures.
Države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, potrebne za uskladitev s tem sklepom, najpozneje do 15. marca 2010 in jih objavijo.
on the aid under Article 99(2)(a) (as regards the agriculture sector) and Article 124(1) and (2) (as amended) of Sicilian Regional Law No 32 of 23 December 2000 laying down provisions for the implementation of the 2000-06 ROP and reorganising the aid schemes for undertakings (aid dossier C 21/04 — ex N 590/B/01)
o pomoči na podlagi člena 99(2)(a) (glede kmetijskega sektorja) ter člena 124(1) in (2) (kot je bil spremenjen) regionalnega zakona Sicilije št. 32 z dne 23. decembra 2000 v zvezi z določbami o izvajanju ROP 2000–2006 in reorganizaciji programov pomoči podjetjem (dokumentacija o pomoči C 21/04 – ex N 590/B/01)
(notified under document C(2009) 8064)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 8064)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to that Article,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenim členom,
By letter dated 28 August 2001, registered as received on 29 August 2001, the Italian Permanent Representation to the European Union notified the Commission, pursuant to Article 88(3) of the Treaty, of the provisions of Articles 99, 107, 110, 111, 112, 120, 122, 123, 124 and 135(3) and (4) of Sicilian Regional Law No 32 of 23 December 2000 laying down provisions for the implementation of the 2000-06 ROP and reorganising the aid schemes for undertakings (hereinafter referred to as ‘Law No 32/2000’).
Stalno predstavništvo Italije pri Evropski uniji je z dopisom z dne 28. avgusta 2001, evidentiranim 29. avgusta 2001, na podlagi člena 88(3) Pogodbe Komisiji priglasilo določbe členov 99, 107, 110, 111, 112, 120, 122, 123, 124 ter 135(3) in (4) regionalnega zakona Sicilije št. 32 z dne 23. decembra 2000 v zvezi z določbami o izvajanju ROP 2000–2006 in reorganizaciji programov pomoči podjetjem (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zakon št. 32/2000).
By letter dated 17 May 2002, registered as received on 21 May 2002, and letter dated 10 October 2002, registered as received on 11 October 2002, the Italian Permanent Representation to the European Union sent the Commission the additional information requested from the Italian authorities in the letters of 24 October 2001 and 18 July 2002.
Stalno predstavništvo Italije pri Evropski uniji je z dopisom z dne 17. maja 2002, evidentiranim 21. maja 2002, in dopisom z dne 10. oktobra 2002, evidentiranim 11. oktobra 2002, Komisiji poslalo dodatne podatke, ki jih je ta zahtevala od italijanskih organov v dopisih z dne 24. oktobra 2001 in 18. julija 2002.
In their letter of 10 October 2002, the Italian authorities supplied additional information concerning only the aid under Article 123 of Law No 32/2000, in view of the urgent nature thereof.
Italijanski organi so z dopisom z dne 10. oktobra 2002 predložili dodatne podatke samo v zvezi s pomočjo na podlagi člena 123 zakona št. 32/2000, ker so bili ti nujni.
The aid under Article 123 of Law No 32/2002 was decoupled from the other aid provided for in the notified articles and declared to be compatible with the common market in the context of aid dossier N 590/A/2001 [1].
Pomoč na podlagi člena 123 zakona št. 32/2002 je bila ločena od ostalih pomoči, določenih v priglašenih členih, in je bila razglašena za združljivo s skupnim trgom v okviru dokumentacije o pomoči N 590/A/2001. [1]
As the Italian authorities’ letter of 10 October 2002 concerned only Article 123 of the regional law in question, the Commission sent them a reminder letter dated 11 February 2003 asking them to answer the other questions set out in the letter of 18 July 2002.
Ker je dopis italijanskih organov z dne 10. oktobra 2002 zadeval le člen 123 zadevnega regionalnega zakona, je Komisija tem organom poslala opomin z dne 11. februarja 2003, v katerem jih je pozvala, naj odgovorijo še na druga vprašanja iz dopisa z dne 18. julija 2002.
By letter dated 5 March 2003, registered as received on 6 March 2003, the Italian Permanent Representation to the European Union sent the Commission the Italian authorities’ reply to the questions raised in the letter of 18 July 2002.
Stalno predstavništvo Italije pri Evropski uniji je z dopisom z dne 5. marca 2003, evidentiranim 6. marca 2003, Komisiji poslalo odgovor italijanskih organov na vprašanja iz dopisa z dne 18. julija 2002.
After examining this reply, the Commission sent a letter dated 2 May 2003 asking the Italian authorities for additional information.
Komisija je, potem ko je preučila ta odgovor, italijanskim organom poslala dopis z dne 2. maja 2003, v katerem jih je prosila za dodatne podatke.
By letter dated 1 October 2003, the Commission explained to the Italian authorities that a decision would be taken on the whole aid dossier (N 590/B/2001), and asked them for some clarifications on one of the articles of Law No 32/2000.
Službe Komisije so v dopisu z dne 1. oktobra 2003 italijanskim organom pojasnile, da bo sprejeta odločba glede celotne dokumentacije o pomoči (N 590/B/2001), in jih prosile za nekaj pojasnil v zvezi z enim od členov zakona št. 32/2000.
By letter dated 7 January 2004, registered as received on 14 January 2004, the Italian Permanent Representation to the European Union sent the Commission the Italian authorities’ reply to the letter of 1 October 2003.
Stalno predstavništvo Italije pri Evropski uniji je z dopisom z dne 7. januarja 2004, evidentiranim 14. januarja 2004, Komisiji poslalo odgovor italijanskih organov na dopis z dne 1. oktobra 2003.
By letter dated 10 March 2004, the Commission officially asked the Italian authorities for further clarifications that had already been requested during informal contacts.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 10. marca 2004 italijanske organe uradno pozvala k predložitvi nadaljnjih pojasnil, ki jih je zahtevala že med neformalnimi stiki.
By letter dated 20 April 2004, registered as received on 21 April 2004, and letter dated 24 May 2004, registered as received on 25 May 2004, the Italian authorities sent the Commission the clarifications referred to in recital 11.
Italijanski organi so z dopisom z dne 20. aprila 2004, evidentiranim 21. aprila 2004, in dopisom z dne 24. maja 2004, evidentiranim 25. maja 2004, Komisiji poslali pojasnila iz uvodne izjave 11.
By letter dated 21 June 2004 [2] and letter dated 10 September 2004 (correction to the previous letter, drafted following comments from the Italian authorities in a letter sent by the Italian Permanent Representation to the European Union on 7 July 2004 and registered as received on 12 July 2004) [3], the Commission informed Italy of its decision not to raise objections as regards Article 99(2)(b) (as regards the agriculture sector) and Articles 107, 110 [4], 112, 120, 122 and 135 of Law No 32/2000 and to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the Treaty as regard the aid under Article 99(2)(a) (as regards the agriculture sector) and Article 124(1) and (2) (for some producer groups) of the Law [5].
Komisija je z dopisoma z dne 21. junija 2004 [2] in 10. septembra 2004 (popravek prejšnjega dopisa, izdelan na podlagi pripomb italijanskih organov v dopisu, ki ga je poslalo Stalno predstavništvo Italije pri Evropski uniji 7. julija 2004 in je bil evidentiran 12. julija 2004) [3] Italijo obvestila o odločitvi, da ne bo nasprotovala členu 99(2)(b) (glede kmetijskega sektorja) ter členom 107, 110 [4], 112, 120, 122 in 135 zakona št. 32/2000, da pa bo začela postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe, kar zadeva pomoč iz člena 99(2)(a) (glede kmetijskega sektorja) ter člena 124(1) in (2) (za nekatere skupine proizvajalcev) zadevnega zakona [5].
The Commission’s decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [6].
Odločitev Komisije o začetku postopka je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [6].
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the aid in question.
Komisija je pozvala vse zainteresirane strani, naj predložijo svoje pripombe glede zadevne pomoči.
Article 99(2)(a) of Law No 32/2000 makes provision for grants to first- and second-level guarantee consortia (consorzi fidi) (in other words, guarantee consortia and associations thereof) to establish or supplement risk funds to be used for the provision of guarantees for the granting of funding by credit institutes, leasing companies, business loan transfer companies and parabanking bodies [7].
S členom 99(2)(a) zakona št. 32/2000 so določene dotacije prvo- in drugostopenjskim jamstvenim konzorcijem (consorzi fidi) (povedano drugače, jamstvenim konzorcijem in njihovim združenjem), ki nameravajo vzpostaviti ali dopolniti sklade za tvegane naložbe, da se zagotovijo poroštva za financiranje, ki ga omogočijo posojilne ustanove, lizinške družbe, družbe za prenos poslovnih posojil in parabančni organi [7].
Such grants, which cannot be combined with other schemes with similar aims, are financed with part of the EUR 20 million earmarked for all the measures under Article 99 and granted to guarantee consortia that apply for them.
Take dotacije, ki jih ni mogoče kumulirati z drugimi programi s podobnimi cilji, se financirajo iz dela zneska v višini 20 milijonov EUR, ki je namenjen za vse ukrepe na podlagi člena 99, in se dodelijo jamstvenim konzorcijem, ki se prijavijo zanje.