natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The reason why the USA export statistics were used was that they appeared to capture the exports of the product concerned under one tariff code and that the volume of other products captured under the same code would be of insignificant importance as far as exports to the Community are concerned.
Statistični podatki ZDA o izvozu so se uporabili, ker se je zdelo, da izvoz zadevnega izdelka vključujejo pod eno tarifno oznako, pri čemer je obseg drugih izdelkov, vključenih pod isto oznako, zanemarljiv, kar zadeva izvoz v Skupnost.
In view of the limitations to use Eurostat data, another alternative to the US export statistics would have been to use the import data reported in the complaint.
Ob upoštevanju omejitev pri uporabi podatkov Eurostata bi bila druga nadomestna možnost za statistične podatke ZDA o izvozu uporaba podatkov o uvozu, sporočenih v pritožbi.
This data was obtained by the complainants from confidential market intelligence sources and therefore recourse to such information would have been subject to this limitation.
Pritožniki so te podatke pridobili iz zaupnih virov tržnih informacij, zato bi bila uporaba takih informacij odvisna od te omejitve.
However, for the sake of completeness the trends of import volumes would have shown the following picture in an indexed form:
Zaradi popolnosti spodnja preglednica v indeksirani obliki prikazuje trende glede obsega uvoza na podlagi podatkov o uvozu:
Indexed 2005=100
Indeks 2005 = 100
The comparison of the Table 3 with Table 2 above would demonstrate that the Commission’s assessment of the import volumes of the product concerned over the analysis period was more conservative than the one that could have been alternatively used.
Primerjava preglednice 3 zgoraj in preglednice 2 kaže, da je bila ocena Komisije glede obsega uvoza zadevnega izdelka v analiziranem obdobju previdnejša kot tista, ki bi se sicer lahko uporabila.
Moreover, this overall picture of the import volumes of Table 3 is compiled from confidential data not susceptible to disclosure whereas the USA statistics is publicly available information.
Poleg tega je ta splošni pregled obsega uvoza v preglednici 3 sestavljen iz zaupnih podatkov, ki jih ni dovoljeno razkriti, medtem ko so statistični podatki ZDA javno dostopne informacije.
The proposed method by the interested party would have shown the following picture regarding the trends of the export volumes on the basis of the information collected from the investigated exporting producers:
Če bi se uporabila metoda, ki jo je predlagala zainteresirana stranka, bi bilo gibanje obsega izvoza na podlagi informacij, zbranih od preiskanih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, naslednje:
The comparison of Table 4 with Table 2 above would demonstrate very similar trends between the method used by the Commission and the one proposed by this party.
Primerjava preglednice 4 s preglednico 2 kaže, da bi bilo gibanje, dobljeno z metodo, ki jo je uporabila Komisija, zelo podobno gibanju na podlagi metode, ki jo je predlagala ta stranka.
The same interested party also claimed that because the product concerned is biodiesel and blends of biodiesel with a biodiesel content above 20 % the volume of imports shown in Table 2 above could not correlate with the correct import volume for the product concerned.
Ista zainteresirana stranka je trdila tudi, da se obseg uvoza, prikazan v preglednici 2 zgoraj, ne ujema s pravilnim obsegom uvoza za zadevni izdelek, ker zadevni izdelek pomeni biodizel in mešanice z vsebnostjo biodizla nad 20 %.
In this regard it is noted that the investigation has not identified any imports of the product concerned with a biodiesel content above B20 and below B99 during the IP.
V zvezi s tem se opozarja, da v preiskavi ni bil ugotovljen uvoz zadevnih izdelkov z vsebnostjo biodizla nad B20 in pod B99 v OP.
In other words the investigation has not identified any imports of the product concerned that because of their low biodiesel content would be classified under a different US HTS code.
Drugače povedano, v preiskavi ni bil ugotovljen uvoz te vrste zadevnega izdelka, saj bi bil ta zaradi nizke vsebnosti biodizla uvrščen pod drugo oznako HTS.
On the basis of the above it is concluded that the import volume presented in the Table 2 of the provisional Regulation represents a reliable, objective and conservative estimation of the imports into the Community of the product concerned.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je mogoče sklepati, da je obseg uvoza iz preglednice 2 začasne uredbe zanesljiva, objektivna in previdna ocena uvoza zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost.
One interested party claimed that the splash and dash quantities exported from the USA should have been distinguished from the imports of the product concerned originating in the USA as the former cannot be treated as imports of US origin.
Ena od zainteresiranih strank je trdila, da je treba količine, ki se izvažajo iz ZDA po vzorcu splash and dash, razlikovati od uvoza zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz ZDA, ker prvih ni mogoče obravnavati kot uvoz s poreklom iz ZDA.
In addition the same party and the USG claimed that contrary to what was stated in recitals (179) and (182) of the provisional Regulation all exports from the USA are not deemed to be originating in the USA.
Poleg tega sta ista stranka in ameriška vlada trdili, da se v nasprotju z navedbami iz uvodnih izjav (179) in (182) začasne uredbe šteje, da ni ves izvoz iz ZDA tudi izvoz s poreklom iz ZDA.
There is no authority in the USA that makes an assessment or a determination with respect to the country of origin of a particular product for export and it cannot be assumed that all biodiesel leaving the territory of the USA is of US origin.
V ZDA ni nobenega organa za ocenjevanje ali ugotovitve v zvezi z državo porekla nekega izvoznega izdelka, zato ni mogoče predvidevati, da je ves biodizel, ki je odpremljen z ozemlja ZDA, biodizel s poreklom iz ZDA.
The same party also stated that the origin regulations established by the US Census Bureau regarding the determination of the origin of the exported goods are not widely known to the biodiesel industry and therefore the exporters of biodiesel when filling out the ‘Shippers Export Declaration’ (SED) normally indicate that the goods exported are of domestic origin.
Ista stranka je navedla tudi, da predpisi glede porekla, ki jih je določila ameriška vladna agencija Census Bureau v zvezi z ugotavljanjem porekla izvoženega blaga, niso splošno znani v industriji biodizla, zato izvozniki biodizla pri izpolnjevanju izvozne deklaracije odpremnika (Shippers Export Declaration) običajno navedejo, da je izvoženo blago domačega porekla.
It further reiterated its claim made at provisional stage that volumes imported in the Community under the splash and dash pattern would represent more than 40 % of the product concerned exported from the USA.
Še enkrat je poudarila svojo trditev iz začasne faze, da količine, uvožene v Skupnost po vzorcu splash and dash, znašajo več kot 40 % zadevnega izdelka, izvoženega iz ZDA.
In support of its claim it used the US import and export data of the HTS codes 3824 90 4020 and 3824 90 4000, and practically claimed that all imports of biodiesel in the USA were re-exported under the splash and dash pattern to the Community.
Svojo zahtevo je podprla s podatki o ameriškem uvozu in izvozu pod oznakama HTS 3824 90 4020 in 3824 90 4000, ter dejansko trdila, da se je celoten obseg uvoza biodizla v ZDA znova izvozil v Skupnost po vzorcu splash and dash.
On the above it is noted that the clarification requested by the US authorities regarding the fact that no US authority makes an assessment or determination of the origin of a particular product for export can be accepted.
V zvezi s tem se ugotavlja, da je mogoče sprejeti pojasnilo, ki so ga zahtevali ameriški organi v zvezi z dejstvom, da noben ameriški organ ne ocenjuje ali ugotavlja porekla nekega izvoznega izdelka.
The claim that splash and dash would represent at least 40 % of the US exports to the Community was based on the assumption that all biodiesel imported in the USA would ultimately be re-exported to the Community under the splash and dash pattern without any volume being consumed in the USA or further being blended in the USA before exportation.
Trditev, da izvoz po vzorcu splash and dash znaša vsaj 40 % ameriškega izvoza v Skupnost, je temeljila na predpostavki, da se bo ves biodizel, uvožen v ZDA, nazadnje znova izvozil v Skupnost po vzorcu splash and dash, ne da bi se del tega biodizla uporabil v ZDA ali bi se v ZDA pred izvozom nadalje mešal.
However, the data presented by this party showed that in the years 2004 to 2006 the imports exceeded by far the exports which would suggest that there is a domestic demand for biodiesel in the USA from other countries.
Vendar so podatki, ki jih je predstavila ta stranka, pokazali, da je uvoz med letoma 2004 in 2006 bistveno presegel izvoz, na podlagi česar je mogoče sklepati, da v ZDA obstaja domače povpraševanje po biodizlu iz drugih držav.
Moreover, this assumption is rather simplistic as it does not take into account the quantities of biodiesel blended in the USA and exported to the Community in which i) the characteristics of the blends are different from those of the input materials which would confer US origin to the whole blended product or ii) blends in which the proportion of US origin biodiesel being the dominant one would confer US origin to the whole blended product.
Poleg tega je ta predpostavka precej poenostavljena, saj v njej niso upoštevane količine biodizla, ki se mešajo v ZDA in izvažajo v Skupnost v mešanicah, ki imajo kot celota poreklo iz ZDA zaradi dejstva, i) ker ima mešanica drugačne lastnosti kot vhodni materiali, ki jo sestavljajo, ali ii) ker je glavni sestavni del mešanic biodizel ameriškega porekla.
It is recalled in this respect that, as mentioned in recital (180) of the provisional Regulation, the US companies investigated declared that it was not possible to differentiate in the quantities exported to the Community or sold on the domestic market between the quantities own produced or sourced in the USA or imported.
V zvezi s tem je treba spomniti, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (180) začasne uredbe, na navedbo ameriških družb, ki se preiskujejo, da pri količinah, izvoženih v Skupnost ali prodanih na notranjem trgu, ni bilo mogoče razlikovati med količinami, proizvedenimi v ZDA ali s poreklom iz ZDA, in uvoženimi količinami.
It is also noted that the origin would appear to have correctly been declared by the US companies concerned as in all of the cases further blending of non-US origin biodiesel was taking place in the USA.
Prav tako se ugotavlja, da se zdi, da so zadevne ameriške družbe pravilno navedle poreklo, ker je v vseh primerih nadaljnje mešanje biodizla, ki nima porekla iz ZDA, potekalo v ZDA.
Indeed, in most of the cases the investigated exporting producers are very large companies or groups of companies with related companies in the Community for which it is difficult to accept that they were not aware of the existing US and Community rules regarding the origin determination.
Dejansko so v večini primerov proizvajalci izvozniki, ki se preiskujejo, zelo velike družbe ali skupine družb s povezanimi družbami v Skupnosti, zato je težko verjeti, da niso bile seznanjene z veljavnimi predpisi ZDA in Skupnosti glede ugotavljanja porekla.
On the basis of all the above it is concluded that there are no grounds to clearly identify the imports made in the Community under the splash and dash pattern for the period considered.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je mogoče sklepati, da ni nobene podlage za jasno opredelitev uvoza v Skupnost po vzorcu splash and dash v obravnavanem obdobju.
It is also considered that there are no grounds to treat these exports, if any, as non-US origin imports.
Prav tako se šteje, da ni nobene podlage za obravnavo tega izvoza, če obstaja, kot uvoza, ki nima porekla iz ZDA.
The table below shows the unit selling price of all imports into the Community market originating in the USA during the period considered as ascertained in recitals (183) and (184) of the provisional Regulation.
V spodnji preglednici je prikazana prodajna cena na enoto za ves uvoz na trg Skupnosti s poreklom iz ZDA v obravnavanem obdobju, kot je določeno v uvodnih izjavah (183) in (184) začasne uredbe.
Source: US export statistics and questionnaire replies of the sampled US exporters.
Vir: statistični podatki ZDA o izvozu in izpolnjeni vprašalniki vzorčenih ameriških izvoznikov
Index2005=100
Indeks (2005 = 100)
For the purpose of analysing price undercutting, the weighted average sales prices of the sampled Community producers charged to unrelated customers on the Community market, adjusted to an ex-works level, were compared to the corresponding weighted average prices of the dumped imports from the USA, established on a CIF basis for the sampled exporting producers in the USA which were found to be dumping into the Community market.
Za analizo nelojalnega nižanja cen so se tehtane povprečne prodajne cene vzorčenih proizvajalcev Skupnosti, ki se zaračunavajo nepovezanim strankam na trgu Skupnosti in so prilagojene na raven cene franko tovarna, primerjale z ustreznimi tehtanimi povprečnimi cenami za dampinški uvoz iz ZDA, določenimi na podlagi CIF za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike v ZDA, za katere se je ugotovilo, da izvajajo damping na trgu Skupnosti.
An adjustment for the customs duties, post-importation costs and for the differences in feedstock used for the production of biodiesel was applied where appropriate as described in recital (186) of the provisional Regulation.
Carine, stroški po uvozu in razlike v surovinah, ki se uporabljajo za proizvodnjo biodizla, so se po potrebi prilagodili, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi (186) začasne uredbe.
Certain exporting producers claimed that the adjustment for the differences in feedstock was understated as it did not reflect correctly the market value of the differences.
Nekateri proizvajalci izvozniki so trdili, da je bila prilagoditev za razlike v surovinah določena prenizko, ker v njej ni pravilno izražena tržna vrednost razlik.
They further claimed that the differences should be obtained on the basis of the prices for the different types of biodiesel in the Community market and quantified this claim by reference to the price quotations, customs cleared Antwerp based, published by a market analyst.
Poleg tega so trdili, da je treba razlike določiti na podlagi cen za različne vrste biodizla na trgu Skupnosti, pri čemer so to trditev količinsko ponazorili s sklicevanjem na navedbe cen s plačano carino v Antwerpnu, ki jih je objavil tržni analitik.
In this regard it is noted that the adjustment was based on the overall, verified data collected from the sampled exporting producers for their operations in the USA and was, therefore, based on the findings of the investigation which is the most reliable source of information.
V zvezi s tem se opozarja, da je prilagoditev temeljila na splošnih preverjenih podatkih, zbranih pri vzorčenih proizvajalcih izvoznikih v zvezi z njihovimi dejavnostmi v ZDA, ter je torej temeljila na ugotovitvah preiskave, ki je najzanesljivejši vir informacij.
Moreover, the price quotations at Community level would have been an inappropriate basis for this adjustment as these price levels would have been influenced by the price levels of the subsidised imports originating in the USA.
Poleg tega bi bile navedbe cen na ravni Skupnosti neustrezna podlaga za to prilagoditev, saj bi na te ravni cen vplivale ravni cen subvencioniranega uvoza s poreklom iz ZDA.
On this basis the claim was rejected.
Na tej podlagi je bila trditev zavrnjena.
The same exporting producers claimed that the adjustment for feedstock differences should only be applied to the sales of the sampled exporting producers and not to the sales of the sampled Community producers as the sales of the latter consist of blends compatible with the Community standards.
Isti proizvajalci izvozniki so trdili, da je treba prilagoditev za razlike v surovinah uporabiti le za izdelke, ki jih prodajajo vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki, in ne za izdelke, ki jih prodajajo vzorčeni proizvajalci Skupnosti, ker prodaja zadnjih vključuje mešanice, skladne s standardi Skupnosti.
This claim was found to be irrelevant as the purpose of the adjustment was to address the differences in feedstock and not any differences in meeting the different standards applicable at Community level.
Za to trditev je bilo ugotovljeno, da je nepomembna, saj je bil namen prilagoditve obvladovanje razlik v surovinah, in ne katerih koli razlik pri izpolnjevanju različnih standardov, ki se uporabljajo na ravni Skupnosti.
The claim was, therefore rejected.
Zato je bila trditev zavrnjena.
The complainant contested the appropriateness of this adjustment by claiming that both Community producers and US exporters use a variety of feedstock and both produce a variety of blends which are provided on both markets and are, therefore, operating with the same range possibilities when it comes to the raw material choice.
Pritožnik je nasprotoval ustreznosti te prilagoditve s trditvijo, da tako proizvajalci Skupnosti kot tudi ameriški izvozniki uporabljajo različne surovine in proizvajajo različne mešanice, ki se dobavljajo na obeh trgih, ter torej poslujejo z enakimi možnostmi, kar zadeva izbiro surovin.
In this regard it is noted that, whilst it is true that both Community producers and US exporting producers use a variety of blends based on different feedstock, the repartition of feedstock in the blends may differ significantly from producer to producer and even from customer to customer of the same producer.
V zvezi s tem se opozarja, da je sicer res, da proizvajalci Skupnosti in ameriški proizvajalci izvozniki uporabljajo različne mešanice na osnovi različnih surovin, vendar se lahko porazdelitev surovin v mešanicah precej razlikuje med proizvajalci in celo strankami enega proizvajalca.
Indeed, the investigation has shown that a precise matching in the blends sold by the sampled Community producers and those sold by sampled exporting producers on the Community market was met in very few occasions Therefore, in order to allow for undercutting calculations to take into account the different product types of biodiesel, it was considered indeed necessary to make the adjustment for differences in feedstock.
Preiskava je dejansko pokazala, da so bile mešanice, ki jih prodajajo vzorčeni proizvajalci Skupnosti, in tiste, ki jih prodajajo vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki na trgu Skupnosti, le redko popolnoma enake. Zato se je za zagotovitev možnosti, da se pri izračunih nelojalnega nižanja cen upoštevajo različne vrste biodizla, prilagoditev razlik v surovinah dejansko štela za potrebno.
Certain exporting producers claimed that the prices used for the injury margin calculations were the CIF Community frontier prices rather than the resale prices to the first unrelated customer.
Nekateri proizvajalci izvozniki so trdili, da so bile cene, ki so se uporabljale za izračune stopnje škode, cene CIF meja Skupnosti, in ne cene pri nadaljnji prodaji prvi nepovezani stranki.
They claimed that these calculations have to be corrected in order to take into account the value and quantities of sales to the first unrelated customer.
Trdili so, da je treba te izračune popraviti, da se upoštevata vrednost in obseg prodaje prvi nepovezani stranki.
This claim was found to be relevant for two exporting producers and the injury calculations were corrected accordingly.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bila ta zahteva upravičena za dva proizvajalca izvoznika, zato so bili izračuni škode ustrezno popravljeni.
On the basis of the above, the average price undercutting margin in the IP, expressed as a percentage of the Community industry’s weighted average ex-work prices, was found to range from 18,9 % to 31,9 %, instead of a range from 18,9 % to 33,0 % at provisional stage.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je povprečna stopnja nelojalno znižane cene v OP, izražena kot odstotek tehtanih povprečnih cen franko tovarna v industriji Skupnosti, nihala od 18,9 % do 31,9 %, medtem ko je bil v začasni fazi ta razpon od 18,9 % do 33,0 %.
As mentioned in recitals (209) to (212) of the provisional Regulation, it was found that the Community industry suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 8(5) of the basic Regulation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah od (209) do (212) začasne uredbe, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je industrija Skupnosti utrpela znatno škodo v smislu člena 8(5) osnovne uredbe.
Indeed, the provisional analysis showed that the performance of the Community industry improved as regards some volume indicators, but that most of the indicators related to the financial situation of the Community industry significantly deteriorated during the period considered.
Dejansko je začasna analiza pokazala, da se je uspešnost industrije Skupnosti izboljšala pri nekaterih kazalnikih obsega, vendar pa se je v obravnavanem obdobju znatno poslabšala večina kazalnikov, povezanih s finančnim položajem industrije Skupnosti.
Notwithstanding the Community industry’s ability to raise capital for investments, return on investments declined dramatically during the IP and profitability declined significantly over the period considered.
Kljub zmožnosti industrije Skupnosti, da zbere kapital za naložbe, se je med OP donosnost naložb močno zmanjšala, prav tako pa se je v obravnavanem obdobju znatno zmanjšala dobičkonosnost.
One interested party claimed that the analysis made in recital (195) of the provisional Regulation regarding the growth of the Community industry was incorrect.
Ena od zainteresiranih strank je trdila, da je bila analiza iz uvodne izjave (195) začasne uredbe v zvezi z rastjo industrije Skupnosti nepravilna.
In particular, this party argued that the provisional Regulation suggested that the strong increase in demand for biodiesel in the Community market was supposed to lead to a comparable increase in the market shares of the Community industry, while there is no direct correlation between the increase in demand and market share.
Ta stranka je zlasti trdila, da je bilo v začasni uredbi navedeno, da naj bi izrazito povečanje povpraševanja po biodizlu na trgu Skupnosti povzročilo primerljivo povečanje tržnih deležev industrije Skupnosti, čeprav ni nobene neposredne povezave med povečanjem povpraševanja in tržnega deleža.
The same party further argued that the injury factors mentioned in the same recital (195) of the provisional Regulation, namely production, utilisation of production capacity, productivity, sales, investment policy, return on investments, cannot be considered as severely affected.
Ista stranka je trdila tudi, da ni mogoče govoriti o resnem vplivu na dejavnike škode, navedene v isti uvodni izjavi (195) začasne uredbe, to so proizvodnja, stopnja izkoriščenosti proizvodne zmogljivosti, produktivnost, prodaja, naložbena politika in donosnost naložb.
The argument regarding the de-correlation between demand and market share is accepted.
Trditev v zvezi z odpravo povezave med povpraševanjem in tržnim deležem se sprejme.
However, it remains that between 2006 and the IP, the market share of the sampled Community producers was multiplied by 1,2 while during the same time, the market share of subsidised imports was multiplied by around 17.
Kljub temu ostaja dejstvo, da se je tržni delež vzorčenih proizvajalcev Skupnosti med letom 2006 in OP 1,2-kratno povečal, medtem ko se je v istem obdobju tržni delež subvencioniranega uvoza povečal približno sedemnajstkrat.
This comparatively strong increase in market share for US imports is the result of much lower sales prices for these US imports as shown in table 5 and recital (118) above.
To sorazmerno veliko povečanje tržnega deleža ameriškega uvoza je posledica veliko nižjih prodajnih cen tega uvoza, kot je prikazano v preglednici 5 in uvodni izjavi (118).
Regarding the claim about the global assessment of all injury factors, it is acknowledged that not all these factors were deteriorating during the period considered.
Kar zadeva trditev v zvezi s splošno oceno vseh dejavnikov škode, se ugotavlja, da se vsi ti dejavniki v obravnavanem obdobju niso poslabšali.