natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In balancing these elements, the Commission further notes that the Spanish authorities have agreed to reduce the amount of eligible costs, to revise their classification, to adapt the aid instrument and to reduce the overall amount of aid.
Pri tehtanju teh elementov Komisija nato opozarja, da so se španski organi strinjali z zmanjšanjem zneska upravičenih stroškov, da spremenijo njihovo razvrstitev, prilagodijo instrument pomoči in zmanjšajo skupni znesek pomoči.
The Spanish authorities will provide an annual report on the implementation of the aid, allowing the Commission to monitor the measure.
Španski organi bodo predložili letno poročilo o izvajanju pomoči in Komisiji omogočili spremljanje ukrepa.
In conclusion, the Commission is able to say that the balancing test for the aid under assessment is positive.
Na koncu Komisija lahko ugotovi, da je preskus tehtanja za ocenjevano pomoč pozitiven.
On the basis of the above, the Commission therefore concludes that it should raise no objections to the aid of EUR 35,2624 million that Spain intends to grant to ITP for the development of the low pressure turbine of the Trent 1000 engine developed by RR for the Boeing 787.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega Komisija torej lahko sklene, da ne sme ugovarjati pomoči v višini 35,2624 milijona EUR, ki jo Španija namerava dodeliti podjetju ITP za razvoj nizkotlačne turbine za motor Trent 1000, ki ga razvija podjetje RR za Boeing 787.
Finally, the Commission considers that the aid granted by Spain involves no indirect aid to RR,
Po mnenju Komisije pomoč, ki jo bo dodelila Španija, ne vključuje posredne pomoči podjetju RR –
The State aid which Spain is intending to grant to ITP, amounting to EUR 35262400, is compatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč, ki jo Španija namerava dodeliti podjetju ITP v višini 35262400 EUR, je združljiva s skupnim trgom.
Implementation of the aid is accordingly authorised.
Izvajanje pomoči se torej dovoli.
Done at Brussels, 21 October 2008.
Bruslju, 21. oktobra 2008
OJ C 108, 12.5.2007, p. 18.
UL C 108, 12.5.2007, str. 18.
Cases C 38/01 and N 165/03, respectively.
Zadevi C 38/01 oziroma N 165/03.
Commission’s letters of 10 October 2006 and 30 November 2006.
Dopisa Komisije z dne 10. oktobra 2006 in 30. novembra 2006.
According to Spain, the scheme managed by the CDTI was in force before the accession of Spain to the European Community in 1986.
Španija je navedla, da se je shema, ki jo upravlja Agencija CDTI, uporabljala že pred pristopom Španije k Evropski skupnosti leta 1986.
It should also be noted that ITP is the sole Spanish producer in the sector.
Treba je tudi poudariti, da je podjetje ITP edini španski proizvajalec v tem sektorju.
C 38/01 and N 165/03.
C 38/01 in N 165/03.
A similar provision is contained in point 38 of the Guidelines on National Regional Aid (OJ C 54, 4.3.2006, p. 13), which request that the Member State notifies to the beneficiary its intention to grant the aid through a letter of intent.
Podobno določbo vsebuje točka 38 Smernic o nacionalni regionalni pomoči (UL C 54, 4.3.2006, str. 13), v skladu s katero mora država članica upravičenca obvestiti o tem, da mu namerava dodeliti pomoč, s pismom o nameri.
See the first paragraph in the decision to open proceedings.
Glej prvi odstavek odločbe o sprožitvi postopka.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 May 2002 in case T-126/99, Graphischer Maschinenbau Gmbh v Commission [2002] ECR II-02427.
Sodba Evropskega sodišča prve stopnje z dne 14.5.2002 v zadevi T-126/99, Graphischer Maschinenbau Gmbh proti Komisiji [2002] ECR II-02427.
See for instance Commission’s decisions on cases N 165/03 (Spain, aid to ITP for the Trent 900), N 372/05 (France, aid to Snecma for the engine SaM 146), N 120/01 (United Kingdom, aid to Rolls-Royce for the development of the Trent 600 and Trent 900 engines), and more recently on cases N 195/07 (Germany, aid to Rolls-Royce Deutschland), and N 447/07 (France, aid to Turbomeca).
Glej na primer odločitve Komisije v zadevah N 165/03 (Španija, pomoč podjetju ITP za Trent 900), N 372/05 (Francija, pomoč podjetju Snecma za motor SaM 146), N 120/01 (Združeno kraljestvo, pomoč podjetju Rolls-Royce za razvoj motorjev Trent 600 in Trent 900), in novejše v zadevah N 195/07 (Nemčija, pomoč podjetju Rolls-Royce Deutschland) in N 447/07 (Francija, pomoč podjetju Turbomeca).
In particular HEGAN, which is the Basque platform in the aeronautic sector.
Zlasti z organizacijo HEGAN, ki zagotavlja podlago letalskemu sektorju v Baskiji.
Point 54bis of document 15931/05 of the European Council on the Financial Perspectives 2007-2013.
Točka 54bis dokumenta 15931/05 Evropskega sveta o finančni perspektivi 2007–2013.
See Commission’s decision on case N 626/06, on the Spanish Regional Map, adopted on 20 December 2006.
Glej odločitev Komisije v zadevi N 626/06 o španski regionalni karti, sprejeto dne 20.12.2006.
In 2007 and 2008 the Commission approved several aid schemes supporting R & D activities notified by Spain.
V letih 2007 in 2008 je Komisija odobrila več shem pomoči za podporo dejavnosti R&R, ki jih je priglasila Španija.
See for example the State aid Action Plan — Less and better targeted State aid: a roadmap for State aid reform 2005-2009, COM(2005) 107 final, adopted by the Commission on 7 June 2005.
Glej na primer Akcijski načrt državnih pomoči – Manjša in bolje usmerjena državna pomoč: časovni načrt za reformo državnih pomoči 2005–2009; COM(2005) 107 konč., sprejela Komisija 7. junija 2005.
Accordingly, there is no regional bonus in the recently adopted Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 of 6 August 2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General block exemption Regulation) (OJ L 214, 9.8.2008, p. 3).
Zato v pred kratkim sprejeti Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 800/2008 z dne 6. avgusta 2008 o razglasitvi nekaterih vrst pomoči za združljive s skupnim trgom z uporabo členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe (Uredba o splošnih skupinskih izjemah) (UL L 214, 9.8.2008, str. 3) ni regionalnih dodatkov.
See also paragraph 31 above.
Glej tudi predhodni odstavek 31.
This argument is discussed in more detail in the next section (see the next section in the decision, paragraphs 104 et seq.).
Ta utemeljitev je podrobneje obravnavana v naslednjem oddelku (glej naslednji oddelek odločbe, odstavki 104 in naslednji).
Trent 500 and Trent 900, the subjects of cases C 38/01 and N 165/03, respectively.
Trent 500 in Trent 900, predmeta zadev C 38/01 oziroma N 165/03.
It should also be noted that in the same presentation, reference is made to potential difficulties in the discussions with the Commission, albeit referring at worst to some adjustments to the amounts and conditions without mentioning the risk of full prohibition of the aid.
Treba je tudi opozoriti, da so v isti predstavitvi omenjene morebitne težave v razpravah s Komisijo, v najslabšem primeru naj bi nekoliko prilagodili zneske in pogoje, možnosti za prepoved pomoči v celoti pa ne omenjajo.
This reference, however, does not give rise to any legitimate expectation from the company of receiving the aid itself.
Vendar te omembe ne vzbujajo upravičenih pričakovanj, da bo podjetje prejelo pomoč.
It simply reflects the experience of the company in two previous State aid cases.
Izražajo samo izkušnje podjetja iz dveh predhodnih primerov državne pomoči.
Notably in the projects funded under the Framework Programme for R & D — see Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013) (OJ L 412, 30.12.2006, p. 1) — and in its experience in the assessment of State aid cases in the aero engines sector.
Zlasti pri projektih, ki se financirajo na podlagi okvirnega programa za raziskave in razvoj – glej Sklep št. 1982/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o Sedmem okvirnem programu Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007–2013) (UL L 412, 30.12.2006, str. 1) – in izkušnjah pri oceni primerov državne pomoči v sektorju letalskih motorjev.
These standards allow for a different classification in the accounts of expenditures relating to industrial research, classified as expense, and experimental development, classified as an asset.
Ti standardi omogočajo drugačno razvrstitev kontov odhodkov za industrijske raziskave, ki se razvrstijo kot odhodek, in kontov za eksperimentalni razvoj, ki se razvrstijo kot sredstva.
In its letter of 25 February 2008, ITP notes that it had applied for a ‘reimbursable loan in case of success of the project’.
V svojem dopisu z dne 25.2.2008 podjetje ITP navaja, da je zaprosilo za „povračljivo posojilo v primeru uspeha projekta“.
And the distortion of competition is less, since the product has not been a success.
In tako je manj izkrivljanja konkurence, saj proizvod na trgu ni uspel.
The R & D & I Framework explicitly foresees that in case of success exceeding the outcome defined as successful, the Member State concerned should be entitled to request payments exceeding repayment of the advance (see the sixth paragraph of section 5.1.5).
Okvir R & R & I izrecno določa, da v primeru uspeha, ki presega izid, ki je zgoraj opredeljen kot uspešen, mora biti zadevna država članica upravičena, da zahteva izplačila, ki presegajo povračilo predujma (glej šesti odstavek oddelka 5.1.5).
Spain also argues that such a bonus was allowed for the previous cases concerning ITP.
Španija to utemeljuje tudi s tem, da je bil tak dodatek dovoljen v predhodnih primerih za podjetje ITP.
Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).
Priporočilo Komisije 2003/361/ES z dne 6. maja 2003 (UL L 124, 20.5.2003, str. 36).
Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) (OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 139/2004 z dne 20. januarja 2004 o nadzoru koncentracij podjetij (Uredba ES o združitvi) (UL L 24, 29.1.2004, str. 1).
In RR’s words: ‘RR has developed a productive working relationship with ITP and ITP has gained an in-depth understanding of RR working practices, procedures, tools and methods’.
Po besedah podjetja RR: „Podjetje RR je s podjetjem ITP razvilo ploden deloven odnos in podjetje ITP se je dodobra seznanilo z delovno prakso, postopki, orodji in metodami podjetja RR.“
Case C 38/01 (OJ L 61, 27.2.2004, p. 87).
Zadeva C 38/01 (UL L 61, 27.2.2004, str. 87).
See paragraphs 149 to 151 above.
Glej predhodne odstavke 149 do 151.
Cases Eurocopter N 186/06, Turbomeca N 447/07 or Rolls-Royce Deutschland N 195/07.
Zadeve Eurocopter N 186/06, Turbomeca N 447/07 ali Rolls-Royce Deutschland N 195/07.
It is a normal practice in the sector that RRSP pay an entry fee to the OEM.
V tem sektorju je običajno, da partner pri delitvi tveganja in prihodkov plača proizvajalcu originalne opreme vstopno pristojbino.
RR has no shareholding link with these companies.
Podjetje RR s temi podjetji ni bilo povezano prek imetništva delnic.
Spain replied by letter of 17 July 2008.
Španija je odgovorila z dopisom z dne 17. julija 2008.
Spain then submitted a revised version of this letter on 7 August 2008.
Španija je nato 7. avgusta 2008 predložila spremenjeno različico tega dopisa.
The Trent 1000 received airworthiness certification on 7 August 2007.
Trent 1000 je prejel potrdilo o plovnosti 7. avgusta 2007.
Its entry into service is however delayed because of major delays in the development of the aircraft itself with respect to the initial schedule.
Pri začetku njegove uporabe pa prihaja do zamude zaradi velikih zamud pri razvoju samega letala glede na prvotni časovni okvir.
Finally, Spain claims that ITP had legitimate expectations of receiving the aid, because aid had been granted in the meantime by the CDTI to ITP, covering the 2005 costs of the project.
Na koncu Španija zatrjuje, da je podjetje ITP lahko upravičeno pričakovalo, da bo prejelo pomoč, saj mu je medtem agencija CDTI odobrila pomoč za pokritje stroškov projekta iz leta 2005.
This aid was not notified to the Commission since it was based on an approved aid scheme and was below the thresholds for individual notification.
Ta pomoč ni bila priglašena Komisiji, ker je temeljila na odobreni shemi pomoči in ni presegala pragov za individualno priglasitev.
Referring to the Graphischer Maschinenbau case [13], Spain argues that if it had granted the aid illegally, the 1996 R & D Framework would apply.
Ob sklicevanju na primer Graphischer Maschinenbau [13] je Španija utemeljevala, da če bi dodelila pomoč nezakonito, bi se uporabil Okvir R & R iz leta 1996.
Since, according to Spain, the R & D & I Framework in application after 1 January 2007 is more restrictive than the 1996 R & D Framework, in applying the new rules the Commission would thus penalise the Member State which has notified the aid.
Ker je Okvir R & R & I, ki se uporablja od 1. januarja 2007, bolj omejevalen kot Okvir R & R iz leta 2006, naj bi po mnenju Španije Komisija z uporabo novih pravil oškodovala državo članico, ki je priglasila pomoč.
According to Spain, ITP is a relatively young company, since it was established only in 1989.
Po mnenju Španije je ITP sorazmerno mlado podjetje, saj je bilo ustanovljeno šele leta 1989.
Because of its age, ITP would not be able to benefit yet from the positive cash-flow deriving from past investments.
Ker še ni dovolj staro, še ni moglo koristiti pozitivnega denarnega toka iz preteklih naložb.
Further, ITP has heavily invested in R & D in recent years, since the ratio between R & D and turnover was 16 % in 2005, 26 % in 2006 and 22 % in 2007.
Nadalje, podjetje ITP je v zadnjih letih veliko vlagalo v raziskave in razvoj, saj je bilo leta 2005 razmerje med raziskavami in razvojem ter prihodkom 16 %, leta 2006 26 % in leta 2007 22 %.
Spain compares these figures with a European average for the sector of 11 % in 2005 and 2006.
Španija te številke primerja z evropskim povprečjem za ta sektor, ki je v letih 2005 in 2006 znašalo 11 %.
Spain indicates that without the aid for the Trent 1000, the figures for R & D/turnover would have fallen to […] % and […] % in 2006 and 2007 respectively.
Španija navaja, da bi se brez pomoči za Trent 1000 številke za raziskave in razvoj/prihodek zmanjšale na […] % oziroma […] % za leto 2006 oziroma 2007.
In their letter of 18 September 2008, Spain indicated that the final aid amount would be EUR 35,2624 million. Spain also provided a revised payment and reimbursement schedule, along the lines indicated above in paragraphs 141 to 148.
Španija je v dopisu z dne 18. septembra 2008 navedla, da bo končni znesek pomoči znašal 35,2624 milijona EUR. Španija je predložila tudi revidiran razpored plačil in poplačil v skladu s predhodnimi odstavki od 141 do 148.
Total eligible costs of the project for the entire period 2005-2008 amount to EUR 73,567 million. Of these the costs relating to activities classified as industrial research amount to EUR 29,296 million (39,8 % of total eligible costs).
Skupni upravičeni stroški projekta za celotno obdobje med letoma 2005 in 2008 znašajo 73,567 milijona EUR. Od tega obsegajo stroški dejavnosti, razvrščenih kot industrijske raziskave, 29,296 milijona EUR (39,8 % skupnih upravičenih stroškov).
In its assessment, the Commission can only base itself on the rules it has spelled out, which are contained in the R & D & I Framework. On that basis, considerations regarding the potential disadvantage to the project that would derive from the fact of being carried out in an assisted area have to be demonstrated and taken into account in the assessment of the market failure and of the incentive effect.
Komisija se v svoji oceni lahko opre le na pravila, ki jih je jasno razložila in so navedena v Okviru R & R & I. V skladu s tem je treba premisleke glede morebitnih slabosti za projekt, ki bi lahko izhajale iz dejstva, da se izvaja na območju, upravičenem do pomoči, prikazati in upoštevati pri oceni tržne nepopolnosti in spodbujevalnega učinka.
As indicated above, the aid has to be assessed in its entirety under the applicable rules, which is the R & D & I Framework. The R & D & I Framework no longer provides for the possibility of increasing the aid intensity for projects carried out in assisted areas.
Kot je bilo že navedeno, je treba celotno pomoč oceniti na podlagi veljavnih pravil, to pa je Okvir R & R & I. Okvir R & R & I več ne predvideva možnosti povečanja intenzivnosti pomoči za projekte, ki se izvajajo na območjih, upravičenih do pomoči.
It was created in 1991.
Ustanovljeno je bilo leta 1991.
It has participated in the development of other engines, in the military sector, such as the EJ200 for the Eurofighter Typhoon, and in the civil sector, such as Trent 500 and Trent 900.
Sodelovalo je že pri razvoju drugih motorjev, na primer v vojaškem sektorju, kot je EJ200 za Eurofighter Typhoon, ter civilnem sektorju, kot sta Trent 500 in Trent 900.
A repayable advance is defined by section 2.2(h) of the R & D & I Framework. The conditions for its compatibility are defined in point 5.1.5 of the R & D & I Framework.
Vračljivo predplačilo je opredeljeno v oddelku 2.2(h) Okvira R & R & I. Pogoji za njegovo združljivost so opredeljeni v točki 5.1.5 Okvira R & R & I.
ITP is a large enterprise: its total sales in 2006 amounted to around EUR 439 million. The number of employees of ITP and its subsidiaries is around 2400 people.
ITP je veliko podjetje: njegova celotna prodaja je leta 2006 znašala približno 439 milijonov EUR. ITP in njegove hčerinske družbe imajo približno 2400 zaposlenih.
of 11 March 2009
z dne 11. marca 2009
on the publication with a restriction of the reference of standard EN 12312-9:2005 ‘Aircraft ground support equipment — Specific requirements — Part 9: Container/Pallet loaders’ in accordance with Directive 98/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o omejeni objavi sklicevanja na standard EN 12312-9:2005 „Podporna oprema na tleh za letalski promet – Posebne zahteve – 9. del: Nakladalniki zabojnikov/palet“ v skladu z Direktivo 98/37/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(notified under document number C(2009) 1551)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 1551)
Where a national standard transposing a harmonised standard, the reference of which has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, covers one or more essential health and safety requirements set out in Annex I to Directive 98/37/EC, a machine built in accordance with that standard is presumed to meet the essential requirements concerned.
Kadar nacionalni standard, ki prevzema usklajeni standard, na katerega je bilo sklicevanje objavljeno v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, zajema eno ali več bistvenih zdravstvenih in varnostnih zahtev, določenih v Prilogi I k Direktivi 98/37/ES, se za stroj, izdelan v skladu z navedenim standardom, domneva, da izpolnjuje bistvene zahteve v zvezi s tem.
Pursuant to Article 6(1) of Directive 98/37/EC, France lodged a formal objection in respect of standard EN 12312-9:2005, ‘Aircraft ground support equipment — Specific requirements — Part 9: Container/Pallet loaders’ adopted by the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) on 21 March 2005, the reference of which has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3].
V skladu s členom 6(1) Direktive 98/37/ES je Francija vložila uradni ugovor v zvezi s standardom EN 12312-9:2005, „Podporna oprema na tleh za letalski promet – Posebne zahteve – 9. del: Nakladalniki zabojnikov/palet“, ki ga je 21. marca 2005 sprejel Evropski odbor za standardizacijo (CEN) in katerega sklicevanje je bilo objavljeno v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3].
One of the main risks associated with airport container and pallet loaders is the risk of falling from the raised operating position and from other positions to which the operators have access when operating the cargo doors and handling the loads.
Ena glavnih nevarnosti, povezana z nakladalniki zabojnikov in palet za letalski promet, je nevarnost padca z dvignjenega delovnega položaja in z drugih položajev, do katerih imajo upravljavci dostop med upravljanjem s tovornimi vrati in premeščanjem bremen.
The means of protection against this risk must be effective while accommodating the shape of the aircraft and avoiding damage to it.
Ukrepi za zaščito pred tveganji morajo biti učinkoviti in se obenem prilagoditi obliki letala in preprečiti njegovo poškodbo.
Having examined standard EN 12312-9:2005, the Commission has established that it fails to meet the essential health and safety requirement 1.5.15 of Annex I to Directive 98/37/EC on the risk of slipping, tripping or falling, in conjunction with the essential health requirement 1.1.2(b) of that Annex on the principles of safety integration.
Komisija je po preučitvi standarda EN 12312-9:2005 ugotovila, da ne izpolnjuje bistvene zdravstvene in varnostne zahteve 1.5.15 iz Priloge I k Direktivi 98/37/ES glede tveganja zdrsa, spotikanja ali padca, v povezavi z bistveno zdravstveno zahtevo 1.1.2 (b) iz navedene priloge o načelih vgraditve varnosti.
In particular, clause 5.6 of the standard ‘Crushing, shearing and falling’, does not give specifications for the choice, design, location and construction of the means to be used to protect against falling from container and pallet loaders but only refers to the general specifications of EN 1915-1:2001, ‘Aircraft ground support equipment — General requirements — Part 1: Basic safety requirements’ which describe the various types of protection that can be used.
Zlasti klavzula 5.6 standarda „Mečkanje, striženje in padec“ ne določa specifikacij glede izbire, zasnove, lokacije in gradnje naprav za zaščito pred padci z nakladalnikov zabojnikov in palet, ampak se zgolj sklicuje na splošne specifikacije standarda EN 1915-1:2001, „Podporna oprema na tleh za letalski promet – Splošne zahteve – 1. del: Osnovne varnostne zahteve“, ki opisujejo različne vrste zaščite, ki se lahko uporabijo.
In the interest of safety and legal certainty, the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the reference of standard EN 12312-9:2005 should therefore be accompanied by an appropriate warning.
Zaradi varnosti in pravne gotovosti je treba objavi sklicevanja na standard EN 12312-9:2005 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije zato priložiti ustrezno opozorilo.
Member States should add an identical warning in their publication of the reference of national standards transposing standard EN 12312-9:2005,
Države članice morajo dodati enako opozorilo v svojo objavo sklicevanja na nacionalne standarde, ki prevzemajo standard EN 12312-9:2005 –
The publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the reference of standard EN 12312-9:2005 ‘Aircraft ground support equipment — Specific requirements — Part 9: Container/Pallet loaders’ shall be as set out in the Annex.
Objava sklicevanja v Uradnem listu Evropske unije na standard EN 12312-9:2005 „Podporna oprema na tleh za letalski promet – Posebne zahteve – 9. del: Nakladalniki zabojnikov/palet“ je določena v Prilogi.
Where, pursuant to Article 5(2) of Directive 98/37/EC, Member States publish the reference of a national standard transposing harmonised standard EN 12312-9:2005, they shall add to that publication a warning identical to that set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Kadar države članice v skladu s členom 5(2) Direktive 98/37/ES objavijo sklicevanje na nacionalni standard, ki prevzema usklajeni standard EN 12312-9:2005, k navedeni objavi priložijo opozorilo, ki je enako opozorilu iz Priloge k tej odločbi.
Done at Brussels, 11 March 2009.
V Bruslju, 11. marca 2009
OJ C 336, 31.12.2005, p. 12.
UL C 336, 31.12.2005, str. 12.
Publication of titles and references of European harmonised standards under Directive 98/37/EC
Objava naslovov in sklicevanj na usklajene evropske standarde v okviru Direktive 98/37/ES
Reference of superseded standard
Sklicevanje na nadomeščeni standard
Date of cessation of presumption of conformity of superseded standard
Datum, ko preneha veljati domneva o skladnosti nadomeščenega standarda
Aircraft ground support equipment — Specific requirements — Part 9: Container/Pallet loaders
Podporna oprema na tleh za letalski promet – Posebne zahteve – 9. del: Nakladalniki zabojnikov/palet