natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Whole ground Chia is produced by passing the whole seeds through a variable speed hammer mill.
Zmleta cela semena oljne kadulje nastanejo s tlačenjem celih semen skozi kladivni drobilnik različnih hitrosti.
Composition of Chia seed
Sestava semena oljne kadulje
Dry matter
suha snov
Carbohydrate
ogljikovi hidrati
Crude Fibre [1]
surova vlakna [1]
Ash
pepel
Crude fibre is the part of fibre made mainly of indigestible cellulose, pentosans and lignin.
Surova vlakna so del vlaken, ki so sestavljena pretežno iz neprebavljive celuloze, pentosanov in lignina.
of 3 November 2009
z dne 3. novembra 2009
relating to the draft Regional Legislative Decree declaring the Autonomous Region of Madeira to be an Area Free of Genetically Modified Organisms, notified by the Republic of Portugal pursuant to Article 95(5) of the EC Treaty
o osnutku regionalne uredbe z zakonsko močjo o razglasitvi avtonomne regije Madeira za območje brez gensko spremenjenih organizmov, o katerem je Republika Portugalska v skladu s členom 95(5) Pogodbe ES predložila uradno obvestilo
In a letter dated 5 May 2009, the Portuguese Permanent Representation to the European Union notified the Commission, in accordance with Article 95(5) of the EC Treaty, a draft Regional Legislative Decree (hereinafter: ‘the draft decree’) declaring the Autonomous Region of Madeira to be an Area Free of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs).
V pismu z dne 5. maja 2009 je Stalno predstavništvo Republike Portugalske pri Evropski uniji v skladu s členom 95(5) Pogodbe ES uradno obvestilo Komisijo o osnutku regionalne uredbe z zakonsko močjo (v nadaljevanju: osnutek uredbe) o razglasitvi avtonomne regije Madeira za območje brez gensko spremenjenih organizmov (GSO).
The draft decree was accompanied by an explanatory statement and a document setting out the arguments reasoning and justifying the declaration of the Autonomous Region of Madeira as an Area Free from GMOs.
Osnutku uredbe sta bila priložena obrazložitev in dokument z utemeljitvijo razglasitve avtonomne regije Madeira za območje brez gensko spremenjenih organizmov.
By a letter of 26 June 2009, the Commission informed the Portuguese authorities that it had received the notification under Article 95(5) of the EC Treaty and that the six-month period for its examination pursuant to Article 95(6) had begun following this notification.
S pismom z dne 26. junija 2009 je Komisija obvestila portugalske organe, da je prejela uradno obvestilo v skladu s členom 95(5) Pogodbe ES in da se je s prejetjem obvestila začelo šestmesečno obdobje preverjanja v skladu s členom 95(6).
The Portuguese notification contained no scientific literature, studies, or any other scientific information that would support the respective argumentation.
Uradno obvestilo Portugalske ni vsebovalo znanstvene literature, študij ali drugih znanstvenih informacij, ki bi podprle navedeno utemeljitev.
Therefore the Commission asked Portugal by that letter to complement its notification with more concrete information in the form of relevant scientific literature which would indicate the evidence relating to the protection of the environment or the working environment on grounds of a problem specific to the region of Madeiras.
Zato je Komisija Portugalsko v pismu pozvala tudi, naj uradno obvestilo dopolni s konkretnejšimi informacijami v obliki ustrezne znanstvene literature, v kateri bi bili navedeni dokazi, vezani na varstvo okolja ali delovnega okolja zaradi problema, ki je specifičen za regijo Madeira.
Portugal submitted complementary information on 31 July 2009.
Portugalska je dodatne informacije predložila 31. julija 2009.
The Commission published a notice regarding the request in the Official Journal of the European Union [1] to inform the other parties concerned of the draft national measure that Portugal intended to adopt.
Komisija je obvestilo o zahtevi objavila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [1] in na ta način o osnutku nacionalnega ukrepa, ki ga namerava sprejeti Portugalska, obvestila tudi druge zadevne stranke.
Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Latvia, Malta and Romania submitted their comments.
Bolgarija, Češka, Danska, Francija, Latvija, Malta in Romunija so predložile svoje pripombe.
(…) If, after the adoption by the Council or by the Commission of a harmonisation measure, a Member State deems it necessary to introduce national provisions based on new scientific evidence relating to the protection of the environment or the working environment on grounds of a problem specific to that Member State arising after the adoption of the harmonisation measure, it shall notify the Commission of the envisaged provisions as well as the grounds for introducing them.
(…) država članica, če po tem, ko Svet ali Komisija sprejme usklajevalni ukrep, meni, da mora na podlagi novih znanstvenih spoznanj o varstvu okolja ali delovnega okolja uvesti nacionalne določbe zaradi problema, ki je specifičen zanjo in je posledica sprejetja usklajevalnega ukrepa, o načrtovanih določbah, pa tudi o razlogih za njihovo uvedbo uradno obvesti Komisijo.
The Commission shall, within six months of the notifications as referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5, approve or reject the national provisions involved after having verified whether or not they are a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States and whether or not they shall constitute an obstacle to the functioning of the internal market.
Komisija v šestih mesecih po uradnih obvestilih iz odstavkov 4 in 5 odobri ali zavrne nacionalne določbe, potem ko preveri, ali so morda sredstvo samovoljne diskriminacije ali prikrita omejitev trgovine med državami članicami in ali ovirajo delovanje notranjega trga.
In the absence of a decision by the Commission within this period the national provisions referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5 shall be deemed to have been approved.
Če Komisija v tem roku ne sprejme nobene odločitve, se šteje, da so nacionalne določbe iz odstavkov 4 in 5 odobrene.
NATIONAL DRAFT PROVISIONS NOTIFIED
PRIGLAŠENI OSNUTKI NACIONALNIH DOLOČB
Scope of the national draft provisions notified
Področje uporabe priglašenih osnutkov nacionalnih določb
In accordance with Article 1 of the draft decree, the Autonomous Region of Madeira is declared to be an area free of the cultivation of varieties of genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
V skladu s členom 1 osnutka uredbe se avtonomna regija Madeira razglasi za območje, na katerem se sorte gensko spremenjenih organizmov ne gojijo.
In accordance with Article 2, the introduction of plant or seed propagating material containing GMOs into the territory of the Autonomous Region of Madeira and also its use in agriculture would be prohibited.
V skladu s členom 2 je v avtonomno regijo Madeira prepovedan vnos rastlin ali semenskega materiala, ki vsebujejo gensko spremenjene organizme, ter njihova uporaba v kmetijstvu.
Article 3 would define the infringement of the provisions of the above article as administrative offence and Article 4 would lay down additional penalties.
Člen 3 določa, da je kršenje določb iz predhodnega člena upravni prekršek, člen 4 pa določa dodatne sankcije.
Article 5 would establish provisions for the investigation, prosecution and decision of the administrative offenses and Article 6 would stipulate the use of the proceeds from fines.
Člen 5 uvaja določbe o preiskavi, pregonu in odločanju o upravnem prekršku, člen 6 pa določa uporabo prihodkov od denarnih kazni.
Impact on Community legislation of the national draft provisions notified
Vpliv priglašenih osnutkov nacionalnih določb na zakonodajo Skupnosti
The scope of the latter draft provisions, in conjunction with the explanation of the explanatory note, implies that it will primarily impact on:
Glede na področje uporabe navedenega osnutka določb in pojasnjevalne opombe bodo imele določbe vpliv zlasti na:
It aims at approximating legislation and procedures in Member States for the authorisation of GMOs intended for deliberate release into the environment.
Njen cilj je približevanje zakonodaje in postopkov držav članic za odobritev gensko spremenjenih organizmov, namenjenih za namerno sproščanje v okolje.
According to its Article 1, Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 aims at (a) providing the basis for ensuring a high level of protection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, environment and consumer interests in relation to genetically food and feed, whilst ensuring the effecting functioning of the internal market; (b) in laying down Community procedures for the authorization and supervision of genetically modified food and feed and (c) in laying down provisions for the labeling of genetically modified food and feed.
Cilj Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 je v skladu s členom 1 Uredbe (a) dati osnovo za zagotavljanje visoke ravni varstva življenja in zdravja ljudi, zdravja in zaščite živali, okolja ter interesov potrošnikov v zvezi z gensko spremenjenimi živili in krmo ob zagotavljanju učinkovitega delovanja notranjega trga; (b) določiti postopke Skupnosti za odobritev in nadzor gensko spremenjenih živil in krme ter (c) določiti določbe za označevanje gensko spremenjenih živil in krme.
JUSTIFICATION PUT FORWARD BY PORTUGAL
UTEMELJITEV, KI JO JE PREDLOŽILA PORTUGALSKA
Information for the draft Act, offering interpretation about the Act’s impact on and conformity with Community legislation, is provided in:
Informacije o osnutku akta, ki pojasnjujejo vpliv akta na zakonodajo Skupnosti in njegovo usklajenost z njo, so navedene v:
The document submitted together with the notification of 5 May 2009 and titled ‘Establishment of the Autonomous Region of Madeira (RAM) as an “Area Free of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs)” — Arguments’,
dokumentu „Vzpostavitev avtonomne regije Madeira kot območja brez gensko spremenjenih organizmov (GSO) – utemeljitev“, ki je bil predložen skupaj z uradnim obvestilom z dne 5. maja 2009,
The additional information submitted on 31 July 2009 titled ‘Establishment of the Autonomous Region of Madeira as an Area Free of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) — Additional information’.
dodatnih informacijah z dne 31. julija 2009 z naslovom „Vzpostavitev avtonomne regije Madeira kot območja brez gensko spremenjenih organizmov (GSO) – dodatne informacije“.
In its justification, Portugal points to agricultural and natural reasons.
V svoji utemeljitvi Portugalska navaja razloge, vezane na kmetijstvo in naravno okolje.
The agricultural reasons refer to the impossibility of co-existence between GM crops and conventional and/or organic crops in the Autonomous Area of Madeira.
Razlogi, vezani na kmetijstvo, se nanašajo na dejstvo, da v avtonomni regiji Madeira gensko spremenjene poljščine ne morejo obstajati skupaj s konvencionalnimi in/ali organskimi poljščinami.
They particularly invoke aspects such as the distance between fields, border strips, sowing of varieties with different growth cycles, refuge areas, installation of pollen traps or barriers to prevent pollen dispersion, crops rotation systems, crop production cycles, reduction of the size of the seed banks through adequate soil tillage, management of populations in field borders, choosing of optimal sowing dates, handling of seeds to avoid mixing or the prevention of seed spillage when travelling to and from the field and on field boundaries.
Zlasti so navedeni vidiki, kot so razdalja med kmetijskimi zemljišči, mejni pasovi, sejanje sort z različnimi rastnimi cikli, zaledje, namestitev lovilcev cvetnega prahu ali preprek za njegovo širjenje, kolobarjenje, proizvodni cikli poljščin, zmanjšanje obsega semenskih bank z ustreznim obdelovanjem zemlje, upravljanje populacije na meji kmetijskih zemljišč, izbira najprimernejšega časa za sejanje, upravljanje s semeni za preprečevanje mešanja ali razsutja med prevozom na kmetijska zemljišča ali z njih oziroma vzdolž njegove meje.
The natural reasons claim that the effects of introducing GMOs into nature (in the case of the RAM, the natural Madeiran forest) have not been adequately studied, although many articles have been published in which concerns are raised with regard to the consequences of deliberately releasing GMOs into nature and to the resulting environmental effects which might be expected.
Med naravnimi razlogi je navedeno, da niso bile opravljene ustrezne študije učinka uvedbe gensko spremenjenih organizmov v naravo (v primeru avtonomne regije Madeira v madeirski naravni gozd), čeprav so bili objavljeni številni članki, v katerih je bila izražena zaskrbljenost glede posledic namernega sproščanja gensko spremenjenih organizmov v okolje in možnega vpliva na okolje.
However there may be other potential risks which are not covered by these scientific studies.
Obstajajo lahko še druga možna tveganja, ki jih znanstvene študije ne obravnavajo.
The natural reasons further refer to:
Naravni razlogi se poleg tega nanašajo na:
preliminary tests carried out using GM varieties;
predhodno testiranje z uporabo gensko spremenjenih sort;
model showing the invasive capacity of GM varieties;
model za testiranje invazivnosti gensko spremenjenih sort;
interaction of the model to the use of plants containing GMOs;
interakcijo modela z uporabo rastlin, ki vsebujejo gensko spremenjene organizme;
capacity of transgenic plants to cross-pollinate;
sposobnost navzkrižnega oplojevanja transgenih rastlin;
parallel effects with other species;
vzporedne učinke na druge vrste;
production of toxins;
proizvodnjo toksinov;
collateral interactions;
stranske interakcije;
effects connected with genetic alterations;
učinke genskih sprememb;
implications in poor agricultural practices;
posledice slabih kmetijskih praks;
gene transfer;
prenos genov;
effects on the food chain.
vplive na živilsko verigo.
Portugal concludes that on the basis of the above, the introduction of genetically modified material into the RAM could have extremely dangerous consequences for the Madeiran environment in general (it would be pointless to distinguish between agricultural and forest areas).
Portugalska v sklepu navaja, da bi imela lahko glede na zgoraj navedeno uvedba gensko spremenjenih organizmov v avtonomno regijo Madeira izrazito nevarne posledice za madeirsko okolje na splošno (nesmiselno bi bilo ločevati kmetijska in gozdna zemljišča).
Although there are no solid theories on the matter, research and experiments, as well as all the theoretical parallels, suggest that the risk to nature presented by the deliberate release of GMOs is so dangerous and poses such a threat to the environmental and ecological health of Madeira, that it is not worthwhile risking their use, either directly in the agricultural sector or even on an experimental basis.
Čeprav glede tega vprašanja ne obstaja zanesljiva teoretična podlaga, pa raziskave in preskusi ter teoretične primerjave kažejo, da bi namerna uporaba gensko spremenjenih organizmov neposredno v kmetijstvu ali celo samo na eksperimentalni podlagi predstavljala preveliko tveganje in grožnjo za okoljske in ekološke razmere v Madeiri.
Article 95(5) of the EC Treaty applies to new national measures on the basis of the protection of the environment or the working environment, on grounds of a problem specific to that Member State arising after the adoption of the harmonisation measure, and which are justified by new scientific evidence.
Člen 95(5) Pogodbe ES se uporablja za nove nacionalne ukrepe glede varstva okolja ali delovnega okolja zaradi problema, ki je specifičen za zadevno državo članico in je posledica sprejetja usklajevalnega ukrepa; ukrepe morajo upravičevati nova znanstvena spoznanja.
Under Article 95(6) of the EC Treaty, the Commission is either to approve or reject the draft national provisions in question after verifying whether or not they are a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States, and whether or not they shall constitute an obstacle to the functioning of the internal market.
Komisija v skladu s členom 95(6) Pogodbe ES odobri ali zavrne zadevne osnutke nacionalnih določb, potem ko preveri, ali so morda sredstvo samovoljne diskriminacije ali prikrita omejitev trgovine med državami članicami in ali ovirajo delovanje notranjega trga.
Nevertheless, under the same provision, when justified by the complexity of the matter and in the absence of danger for human health, the Commission may notify the Member State concerned that the period referred to in this paragraph may be extended for a further period of up to six months.
Navedeni člen določa tudi, da če zahtevnost zadeve to upravičuje in če ni nevarnosti za zdravje ljudi, lahko Komisija zadevno državo članico uradno obvesti, da se rok iz navedenega odstavka lahko podaljša za nadaljnje obdobje največ šestih mesecev.
The notification submitted by the Portuguese authorities on 5 May 2009 is intended to obtain approval for the introduction of the draft decree.
Namen uradnega obvestila, ki so ga 5. maja 2009 predložili portugalski organi, je pridobiti odobritev za uvedbo osnutka uredbe.
Portugal did not specify the European Community act which the draft decree derogates from.
Portugalska ni navedla akta Evropske skupnosti, od katerega osnutek uredbe odstopa.
Cultivation of GMOs is to a large extent regulated by Directive 2001/18/EC, and Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
Gojenje gensko spremenjenih organizmov v veliki meri urejata Direktiva 2001/18/ES in Uredba (ES) št. 1829/2003.
Article 95(5) of the Treaty requires that when a Member State deems it necessary to introduce national provisions derogating from a harmonisation measure, those provisions could be justified on the following cumulative conditions [5]:
Člen 95(5) Pogodbe zahteva, da se, če država članica meni, da je treba uvesti nacionalne določbe, ki odstopajo od usklajevalnega ukrepa, te določbe utemeljijo na podlagi naslednjih kumulativnih pogojev [5]:
new scientific evidence,
novih znanstvenih spoznanj,
relating to the protection of the environment or the working environment,
povezave z varstvom okolja ali delovnega okolja,
on grounds of a problem specific to that Member State,
problema, ki je specifičen za zadevno državo članico,
arising after the adoption of the harmonisation measure.
problema, ki je posledica sprejetja usklajevalnega ukrepa.
The justifications put forward by Portugal make extensive reference to the potential effects of the cultivation of GM varieties on the environment.
V utemeljitvi Portugalske so obširno navedeni možni vplivi gojenja gensko spremenjenih sort na okolje.
The notification contains an analysis of extended and complicated issues such as preliminary tests carried out using GM varieties, model showing the invasive capacity of GM varieties, interaction of the model to the use of plants containing GMOs, capacity of transgenic plants to cross-pollinate, parallel effects with other species, production of toxins, collateral interactions, effects connected with genetic alterations, implications in poor agricultural practices, gene transfer and effects on the food chain.
Uradno obvestilo vsebuje analizo obsežnih in kompleksnih vprašanj, kot so predhodno testiranje z uporabo gensko spremenjenih sort; model za testiranje invazivnosti gensko spremenjenih sort; interakcija modela z uporabo rastlin, ki vsebujejo gensko spremenjene organizme; sposobnost navzkrižnega oplojevanja transgenih rastlin; vzporedni učinki na druge vrste; proizvodnja toksinov; stranske interakcije; učinki genskih sprememb; posledice slabih kmetijskih praks; prenos genov in vpliv na živilsko verigo.
It results from these justifications that a thorough scientific risk assessment is necessary to indicate whether the submitted scientific evidence relates to the protection of the environment or the working environment on grounds of a problem specific to the Autonomous Region of Madeira arising after the adoption of Directive 2001/18/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 or other relevant EC provisions.
Iz teh utemeljitev sledi, da je potrebna temeljita znanstvena ocena tveganja, ki bi pokazala, ali so predloženi znanstveni dokazi vezani na varstvo okolja ali delovnega okolja zaradi problema, ki je specifičen za avtonomno regijo Madeira in je posledica sprejetja Direktive 2001/18/ES in Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 ali drugih ustreznih določb ES.
This assessment should be carried out by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) which, in accordance with Article 22(2) of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety [6], is competent to provide scientific advice and scientific and technical support for the Community’s legislation and policies in all fields which have a direct or indirect impact on food and feed safety, and shall provide independent information on all matters within these fields and communicate on risks.
Oceno opravi Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (EFSA), ki je v skladu s členom 22(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2002 o določitvi splošnih načel in zahtevah živilske zakonodaje, ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost hrane in postopkih, ki zadevajo varnost hrane [6], pristojna, da zagotavlja znanstveno svetovanje ter znanstveno in tehnično podporo zakonodaji in politikam Skupnosti na področjih, ki imajo neposreden ali posreden vpliv na varnost živil in krme, ter zagotavlja neodvisne informacije o vseh zadevah na teh področjih in opozarja na tveganja.
Moreover, in accordance with Article 29 of that Regulation, EFSA shall issue a scientific opinion at the request of the Commission, in respect of any matter within its mission, and in all cases where Community legislation makes provision for the Authority to be consulted.
Poleg tega v skladu s členom 29 navedene Uredbe EFSA na zaprosilo Komisije poda znanstveno mnenje v vseh zadevah v okviru njenega poslanstva in v vseh primerih, kadar zakonodaja Skupnosti predvideva posvetovanje z agencijo.
For this reason the Commission sent on 23 September 2009 a mandate to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) asking it to assess, on the basis of the new evidence provided by Portugal and in the light of the requirements of Article 95(5) of EC Treaty, whether the particular evidence relates to the protection of the environment on grounds of a problem specific to the concerned area, namely the Autonomous Region of Madeira.
Zato je Komisija 23. septembra 2009 Evropsko agencijo za varnost hrane pooblastila, da na podlagi novih dokazov, ki jih je predložila Portugalska, in na podlagi zahtev iz člena 95(5) Pogodbe ES oceni, ali se navedeni dokazi nanašajo na varstvo okolja zaradi problema, ki je specifičen za zadevno območje, tj. avtonomno regijo Madeira.
Under those circumstances, the adoption of the EFSA Opinion is necessary before the adoption of a decision on the Portuguese notification.
V takšnih razmerah je pred sprejetjem odločitve o uradnem obvestilu Portugalske potrebno sprejetje mnenja EFSA.
In view of the extended scope of the potential adverse environmental effects indicated by the Portuguese notification and the complexity of the scientific aspects related to the cultivation of GMOs in the Autonomous Region of Madeira, it is necessary that EFSA is granted a reasonable period of time before adopting its Opinion.
Glede na širok obseg možnih škodljivih okoljskih vplivov, ki so navedeni v uradnem obvestilu Portugalske, in kompleksnost znanstvenih vidikov gojenja gensko spremenjenih organizmov v avtonomni regiji Madeira, mora imeti EFSA za sprejetje odločitve na voljo dovolj časa.
For this reason, the Commission asked EFSA to deliver its Opinion by 31 January 2010.
Zato je Komisija EFSA zaprosila, da mnenje predloži do 31. januarja 2010.
The justifications put forward by Portugal make no specific reference to danger for human health, which would be caused by the cultivation of GMOs in the Autonomous Region of Madeira.
V utemeljitvi Portugalske ni izrecno navedeno, da bi gojenje gensko spremenjenih organizmov v avtonomni regiji Madeira ogrožalo zdravje ljudi.