natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
List of countries referred to in Articles 20 and 22 for which a pre-export notification and an export authorisation is required for exports of scheduled substances of category 3 of the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 111/2005
Seznam držav iz členov 20 in 22, v katerih sta potrebna predhodno uradno obvestilo o izvozu in izvozno dovoljenje za izvoz snovi s seznama skupine 3 iz Priloge k Uredbi (ES) št. 111/2005
This includes the salts of these substances whenever the existence of such salts is possible.’
Vključno s solmi teh snovi, kadar je obstoj takšnih soli možen.“
Commission Regulation (EC) No 298/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 298/2009
of 8 April 2009
z dne 8. aprila 2009,
Opportunity was given by the Commission to the air carriers concerned to consult the documents provided by Member States, to submit written comments and to make an oral presentation to the Commission within 10 working days and to the Air Safety Committee established by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 of 16 December 1991 on the harmonization of technical requirements and administrative procedures in the field of civil aviation [3].
Komisija je zadevnim letalskim prevoznikom dala možnost vpogleda v dokumentacijo, ki so jo zagotovile države članice, ter jim omogočila, da predložijo pisne pripombe in v desetih delovnih dneh pripravijo ustno predstavitev Komisiji in Odboru za varnost v zračnem prometu, ustanovljenemu z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 3922/91 z dne 16. decembra 1991 o uskladitvi tehničnih predpisov in upravnih postopkov na področju civilnega letalstva [3].
Following information resulting from SAFA ramp checks carried out on aircraft of certain Community air carriers, as well as area specific inspections and audits carried out by their national aviation authorities, some Member States have taken certain enforcement measures.
Na podlagi rezultatov preverjanj na ploščadi, opravljenih v okviru programa SAFA na zrakoplovih nekaterih letalskih prevoznikov Skupnosti, ter posebnih inšpekcijskih pregledov za določeno področje in revizij, ki so jih opravili njihovi nacionalni organi za letalstvo, so nekatere države članice sprejele določene izvršilne ukrepe.
They informed the Commission and the Air Safety Committee about these measures: the competent authorities of Sweden have revoked the Air Operator Certificate (AOC) of the carrier Nordic Regional and suspended those of the carriers Fly Excellent and Aero Syncro; the competent authorities of Spain have revoked the AOC of the carrier Bravo Airlines and its operating licence; the competent authorities of Portugal lifted the suspension of the AOC of the carrier Luzair on 22 January 2009 following verification of successful completion of corrective actions by the carrier; the competent authorities of Greece lifted the suspension of the AOC of the carrier Hellenic Imperial Airways on 18 December 2008 following verification of successful completion of corrective actions by the carrier and suspended on 28 January 2009 the AOC of the carrier Euroair Ltd following a request of this carrier and the suspension of the approval of the continuing airworthiness management organisation of the carrier.
O teh ukrepih so obvestile Komisijo in Odbor za varnost v zračnem prometu: pristojni organi Švedske so razveljavili spričevalo letalskega prevoznika Nordic Regional ter začasno preklicali spričevala letalskih prevoznikov Fly Excellent in Aero Syncro; pristojni organi Španije so razveljavili spričevalo letalskega prevoznika Bravo Airlines in njegovo operativno licenco; pristojni organi Portugalske so 22. januarja 2009 odpravili začasni preklic spričevala letalskega prevoznika Luzair, potem ko so preverili, ali je prevoznik uspešno izvedel korekcijske ukrepe; pristojni organi Grčije so 18. decembra 2008 odpravili začasni preklic spričevala letalskega prevoznika Hellenic Imperial Airways, potem ko so preverili, ali je prevoznik uspešno zaključil korekcijske ukrepe, 28. januarja 2009 pa so začasno preklicali spričevalo letalskega prevoznika Euroair Ltd na zahtevo samega prevoznika, potem ko mu je bila začasno odvzeta odobritev organizacije za vodenje stalne plovnosti.
Air carriers from the Republic of Kazakhstan
Letalski prevozniki iz Republike Kazahstan
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Starline KZ certified in Kazakhstan.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih prevoznika Starline KZ, certificiranega v Kazahstanu.
These deficiencies have been identified by Bulgaria as well as other ECAC states during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [4].
Te pomanjkljivosti so med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [4], odkrile Bolgarija in druge države ECAC.
The repetition of these non-compliances shows systemic safety deficiencies in the area of operations and maintenance.
Ponavljanje teh neskladnosti kaže na sistemske varnostne pomanjkljivosti na področju dejavnosti in vzdrževanja.
Starline KZ did not respond adequately and in a timely fashion to an enquiry by the civil aviation authority of Bulgaria regarding the safety aspect of its operation showing a lack of communication, as demonstrated by the absence of adequate response to correspondence from this Member State.
Prevoznik Starline KZ se ni primerno in pravočasno odzval na preiskavo uprave za civilno letalstvo Bolgarije glede varnostnega vidika svoje dejavnosti, s čimer je pokazal pomanjkanje komunikacije, kar je razvidno iz tega, da ni ustrezno odgovoril na korespondenco iz navedene države članice.
Starline KZ demonstrated a lack of ability to address these safety deficiencies, which remain unresolved.
Prevoznik Starline KZ je pokazal pomanjkanje sposobnosti za odpravo teh varnostnih pomanjkljivosti, ki ostajajo nerešene.
The Commission, having regard to the above mentioned deficiencies, has entered on 27 January 2009 in consultation with the competent authorities of Kazakhstan, expressing serious concerns about the safety of the operations of Starline KZ and asking pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 for clarifications regarding the actions undertaken by the competent authorities as well as the carrier to respond to these deficiencies.
Komisija je ob upoštevanju navedenih pomanjkljivosti 27. januarja 2009 začela posvetovanja s pristojnimi organi Kazahstana, na katerih je izrazila resne pomisleke glede varnosti dejavnosti prevoznika Starline KZ ter v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 2111/2005 zahtevala pojasnila v zvezi z ukrepi, ki so jih pristojni organi in prevoznik sprejeli v odgovor na te pomanjkljivosti.
These authorities did not respond adequately and in a timely fashion to an enquiry by the Commission regarding the safety oversight of Starline KZ, since by the required date the Commission did not receive the requested information, in particular the carrier’s AOC together with the complete operations specifications, requirements and restrictions attached thereto.
Ti organi se niso primerno in pravočasno odzvali na preiskavo Komisije glede nadzora nad varnostjo prevoznika Starline KZ, saj Komisija v predpisanem roku ni prejela zahtevanih informacij, zlasti spričevala letalskega prevoznika, skupaj s priloženimi popolnimi specifikacijami dejavnosti, zahtevami in omejitvami.
During the hearing the competent authorities of Kazakhstan presented to the Commission their decision of 4 February 2009 to restrict the operations of Starline KZ to outside the European airspace.
Med zaslišanjem so pristojni organi Kazahstana Komisiji predstavili svojo odločitev z dne 4. februarja 2009, da nameravajo omejiti dejavnosti prevoznika Starline KZ na območje zunaj evropskega zračnega prostora.
In view of the above, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Starline KZ does not meet the relevant safety standards and should therefore be included in Annex A.
Glede na navedeno se na podlagi splošnih meril ocenjuje, da prevoznik Starline KZ ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov in ga je zato treba vključiti v Prilogo A.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of East Wing certified in Kazakhstan.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih prevoznika East Wing, certificiranega v Kazahstanu.
These deficiencies have been identified by France and Romania during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [5].
Te pomanjkljivosti sta med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [5], odkrili Francija in Romunija.
East Wing did not respond adequately to an enquiry by the civil aviation authority of France regarding the safety aspect of its operation showing a lack of communication, as demonstrated by the absence of adequate response to correspondence from this Member State.
Prevoznik East Wing se ni primerno odzval na preiskavo uprave za civilno letalstvo Francije glede varnostnega vidika svoje dejavnosti, s čimer je pokazal pomanjkanje komunikacije, kar je razvidno iz tega, da ni ustrezno odgovoril na korespondenco iz navedene države članice.
East Wing demonstrated a lack of ability to address these safety deficiencies, which remain unresolved.
Prevoznik East Wing je pokazal pomanjkanje sposobnosti za odpravo teh varnostnih pomanjkljivosti, ki ostajajo nerešene.
The Commission, having regard to the above mentioned deficiencies, has entered into consultation with the competent authorities of Kazakhstan, expressing serious concerns about the safety of the operations of East Wings and asking for clarifications regarding the actions undertaken by the competent authorities as well as the carrier to respond to these deficiencies.
Komisija je ob upoštevanju navedenih pomanjkljivosti začela posvetovanja s pristojnimi organi Kazahstana, na katerih je izrazila resne pomisleke glede varnosti dejavnosti prevoznika East Wings ter zahtevala pojasnila v zvezi z ukrepi, ki so jih pristojni organi in prevoznik sprejeli v odgovor na te pomanjkljivosti.
Evidence exists that East Wing has taken over operations from the air carrier GST Aero, an air carrier which was put on Annex A on 22 March 2006 [6] and which was withdrawn after the competent authorities of Kazakhstan informed the Commission of the withdrawal of the AOC in March 2007 [7].
Obstajajo dokazi, da je prevoznik East Wing prevzel dejavnosti prevoznika GST Aero, ki je bil 22. marca 2006 [6] vključen v Prilogo A in z nje izključen, ko so pristojni organi Kazahstana marca 2007 [7] obvestili Komisijo o odvzemu spričevala temu prevozniku.
The competent authorities of Kazakhstan informed that they restricted on 4 February 2009 the operations of East Wing to outside the European airspace.
Pristojni organi Kazahstana so sporočili, da so 4. februarja 2009 dejavnosti prevoznika East Wing omejili na območje zunaj evropskega zračnega prostora.
These authorities, however, did not respond adequately and in a timely fashion to an enquiry by the Commission regarding the safety oversight of East Wing, failing to provide appropriate evidence regarding the carrier’s AOC together with the complete operations specifications, requirements and restrictions attached thereto.
Vendar se ti organi niso primerno in pravočasno odzvali na preiskavo Komisije glede nadzora nad varnostjo prevoznika East Wing, saj niso predložili ustreznih dokazil v zvezi s spričevalom letalskega prevoznika, skupaj s priloženimi popolnimi specifikacijami dejavnosti, zahtevami in omejitvami.
In view of the above, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that East Wing does not meet the relevant safety standards and should therefore be included in Annex A.
Glede na navedeno se na podlagi splošnih meril ocenjuje, da prevoznik East Wing ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov in ga je zato treba vključiti v Prilogo A.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of ATMA Airlines certified in Kazakhstan.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih prevoznika ATMA Airlines, certificiranega v Kazahstanu.
These deficiencies have been identified by Germany, Norway and Turkey during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [8].
Te pomanjkljivosti so med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi v okviru programa SAFA [8], odkrile Nemčija, Norveška in Turčija.
ATMA Airlines did not respond adequately to an enquiry by the civil aviation authority of Germany and Norway regarding the safety aspect of its operation showing a lack of communication, as demonstrated by the absence of adequate response to correspondence from these States.
Prevoznik ATMA Airlines se ni primerno odzval na preiskavo uprav za civilno letalstvo Nemčije in Norveške glede varnostnega vidika svoje dejavnosti, s čimer je pokazal pomanjkanje komunikacije, kar je razvidno iz tega, da ni ustrezno odgovoril na korespondenco iz navedenih držav.
ATMA Airlines demonstrated a lack of ability to address these safety deficiencies, which remain unresolved.
Prevoznik ATMA Airlines je pokazal pomanjkanje sposobnosti za odpravo teh varnostnih pomanjkljivosti, ki ostajajo nerešene.
The Commission, having regard to the above mentioned deficiencies, has entered into consultation with the competent authorities of Kazakhstan, expressing serious concerns about the safety of the operations of ATMA Airlines and asking for clarifications regarding the actions undertaken by the competent authorities as well as the carrier to respond to these deficiencies.
Komisija je ob upoštevanju navedenih pomanjkljivosti začela posvetovanja s pristojnimi organi Kazahstana, na katerih je izrazila resne pomisleke glede varnosti dejavnosti prevoznika ATMA Airlines ter zahtevala pojasnila v zvezi z ukrepi, ki so jih pristojni organi in prevoznik sprejeli v odgovor na te pomanjkljivosti.
The competent authorities of Kazakhstan informed that they restricted on 4 February 2009 the operations of ATMA Airlines to outside the European airspace.
Pristojni organi Kazahstana so sporočili, da so 4. februarja 2009 dejavnosti prevoznika ATMA Airlines omejili na območje zunaj evropskega zračnega prostora.
However, these authorities did not respond adequately and in a timely fashion to an enquiry by the Commission regarding the safety oversight of ATMA Airlines, failing to provide appropriate evidence regarding the carrier’s AOC together with the complete operations specifications, requirements and restrictions attached thereto.
Vendar se ti organi niso primerno in pravočasno odzvali na preiskavo Komisije glede nadzora nad varnostjo prevoznika ATMA Airlines, saj niso predložili ustreznih dokazil v zvezi s spričevalom letalskega prevoznika, skupaj s priloženimi popolnimi specifikacijami dejavnosti, zahtevami in omejitvami.
In view of the above, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that ATMA Airlines does not meet the relevant safety standards and should therefore be included in Annex A.
Glede na navedeno se na podlagi splošnih meril ocenjuje, da prevoznik ATMA Airlines ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov in ga je zato treba vključiti v Prilogo A.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Berkut Air certified in Kazakhstan.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih prevoznika Berkut Air, certificiranega v Kazahstanu.
These deficiencies have been identified by France and Romania during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [9].
Te pomanjkljivosti sta med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [9], odkrili Francija in Romunija.
Berkut Air did not respond adequately and in a timely fashion to an enquiry by the civil aviation authority of Romania regarding the safety aspect of its operation showing a lack of communication, as demonstrated by the absence of adequate response to correspondence from this Member States.
Prevoznik Berkut Air se ni primerno in pravočasno odzval na preiskavo uprave za civilno letalstvo Romunije glede varnostnega vidika svoje dejavnosti, s čimer je pokazal pomanjkanje komunikacije, kar je razvidno iz tega, da ni ustrezno odgovoril na korespondenco iz navedene države članice.
Berkut Air demonstrated a lack of ability to address these safety deficiencies, which remain unresolved.
Prevoznik Berkut Air je pokazal pomanjkanje sposobnosti za odpravo teh varnostnih pomanjkljivosti, ki ostajajo nerešene.
The Commission, having regard to the above mentioned deficiencies, has entered into consultation with the competent authorities of Kazakhstan, expressing serious concerns about the safety of the operations of Berkut Air and asking for clarifications regarding the actions undertaken by the competent authorities to respond to these deficiencies.
Komisija je ob upoštevanju navedenih pomanjkljivosti začela posvetovanja s pristojnimi organi Kazahstana, na katerih je izrazila resne pomisleke glede varnosti dejavnosti prevoznika Berkut Air ter zahtevala pojasnila v zvezi z ukrepi, ki so jih pristojni organi sprejeli v odgovor na te pomanjkljivosti.
The competent authorities of Kazakhstan informed that they suspended in February 2009 the AOC of BEK Air, previously Berkut Air.
Pristojni organi Kazahstana so sporočili, da so februarja 2009 začasno preklicali spričevalo letalskega prevoznika BEK Air, prej znanega kot Berkut Air.
These authorities however did not respond adequately and in a timely fashion to an enquiry by the Commission regarding the safety oversight of Berkut Air, as they failed to provide the requested documentation and demonstrated by the absence of communication of documentary evidence of enforcement actions undertaken.
Vendar se ti organi niso primerno in pravočasno odzvali na preiskavo Komisije glede nadzora nad varnostjo prevoznika Berkut Air, saj niso predložili zahtevane dokumentacije in sporočili ustreznih dokazil o sprejetju korekcijskih ukrepov.
In view of the above, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Berkut Air does not meet the relevant safety standards and should therefore be included in Annex A.
Glede na navedeno se na podlagi splošnih meril ocenjuje, da prevoznik Berkut Air ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov in ga je zato treba vključiti v Prilogo A.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Air Company Kokshetau certified in Kazakhstan.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih prevoznika Air Company Kokshetau, certificiranega v Kazahstanu.
These deficiencies have been identified by Italy during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [10].
Te pomanjkljivosti je med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [10], odkrila Italija.
These deficiencies concern aircraft of type IL-62 which are not equipped with TAWS (E-GPWS), not equipped with harness, not equipped with quick donning oxygen masks for flight above FL 250 and not equipped with appropriate system for illuminating the escape path.
Zadevajo zrakoplov vrste IL-62, ki ni opremljen s sistemom TAWS (E-GPWS), s pasovi, s kisikovimi maskami za let nad FL 250, ki se lahko hitro nadenejo, in z ustreznim sistemom za osvetlitev poti pobega.
Air Company Kokshetau did not respond adequately and in a timely fashion to an enquiry by the civil aviation authority of Italy regarding the safety aspect of its operation showing a lack of communication, as demonstrated by the absence of adequate response to correspondence from this Member State.
Prevoznik Air Company Kokshetau se ni primerno in pravočasno odzval na preiskavo uprave za civilno letalstvo Italije glede varnostnega vidika svoje dejavnosti, s čimer je pokazal pomanjkanje komunikacije, kar je razvidno iz tega, da ni ustrezno odgovoril na korespondenco iz navedene države članice.
Air Company Kokshetau demonstrated a lack of ability to address these safety deficiencies, which remain unresolved.
Prevoznik Air Company Kokshetau je pokazal pomanjkanje sposobnosti za odpravo teh varnostnih pomanjkljivosti, ki ostajajo nerešene.
The Commission, having regard to the above mentioned deficiencies, has entered into consultation with the competent authorities of Kazakhstan, expressing serious concerns about the safety of the operations of Air Company Kokshetau, and asking for clarifications regarding the actions undertaken by the competent authorities to respond to these deficiencies.
Komisija je ob upoštevanju navedenih pomanjkljivosti začela posvetovanja s pristojnimi organi Kazahstana, na katerih je izrazila resne pomisleke glede varnosti dejavnosti prevoznika Air Company Kokshetau ter zahtevala pojasnila v zvezi z ukrepi, ki so jih pristojni organi sprejeli v odgovor na te pomanjkljivosti.
The competent authorities of Kazakhstan informed the Commission that they decided to remove on 13 February 2009 the aircraft of type IL-62M with serial numbers 1138234 and 1748445 from the AOC of Air Company Kokshetau, and that they further intended to recall as of 24 March the AOC of this carrier due to bankruptcy.
Pristojni organi Kazahstana so obvestili Komisijo o svoji odločitvi, da nameravajo 13. februarja 2009 zrakoplov vrste IL-62M s serijskima številkama 1138234 in 1748445 umakniti s spričevala letalskega prevoznika Air Company Kokshetau ter poleg tega s 24. marcem preklicati spričevalo tega letalskega prevoznika zaradi stečaja.
However, these authorities did not respond adequately to an enquiry by the Commission regarding the communication of documentary evidence on the revocation of the AOC.
Vendar se ti organi niso primerno odzvali na preiskavo Komisije glede posredovanja ustreznih dokazil o razveljavitvi spričevala letalskega prevoznika.
In view of the above, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Air Company Kokshetau does not meet the relevant safety standards and should therefore be included in Annex A.
Glede na navedeno se na podlagi splošnih meril ocenjuje, da prevoznik Air Company Kokshetau ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov in ga je zato treba vključiti v Prilogo A.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Sayat Air certified in Kazakhstan.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih prevoznika Sayat Air, certificiranega v Kazahstanu.
These deficiencies have been identified by an ECAC state during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [11].
Te pomanjkljivosti je med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [11], odkrila ena od držav ECAC.
These deficiencies concern aircraft of type IL-62 which are not equipped with a) TAWS (E-GPWS) b) quick donning oxygen masks for the crew, c) flotation devices, and d) an appropriate system for illuminating the escape path.
Zadevajo zrakoplov vrste IL-62, ki ni opremljen s (a) sistemom TAWS (E-GPWS), (b) kisikovimi maskami za posadko, ki se lahko hitro nadenejo, (c) rešilnimi jopiči in (d) ustreznim sistemom za osvetlitev poti pobega.
In addition, the aircraft was operated without emergency checklists on board, with a NAV database outdated for more than 2 years and without a maintenance release on board.
Poleg tega je zrakoplov letel, čeprav na krovu ni imel kontrolnih seznamov za preverjanje v sili in potrdila o vzdrževanju, zbirka podatkov NAV pa je bila že več kot dve leti zastarela.
Sayat Air demonstrated a lack of ability to address these safety deficiencies, which remain unresolved.
Prevoznik Sayat Air je pokazal pomanjkanje sposobnosti za odpravo teh varnostnih pomanjkljivosti, ki ostajajo nerešene.
The competent authorities of Kazakhstan did not respond adequately and in a timely fashion to an enquiry by the Commission regarding the safety oversight of Sayat Air, showing a lack of communication, as demonstrated by the absence of adequate response to correspondence from the Commission, in particular regarding the communication of the carrier’s AOC together with the complete operations specifications, requirements and restrictions attached thereto.
Pristojni organi Kazahstana se niso primerno in pravočasno odzvali na preiskavo Komisije glede nadzora nad varnostjo prevoznika Sayat Air, s čimer so pokazali pomanjkanje komunikacije, kar je razvidno iz tega, da niso ustrezno odgovorili na korespondenco Komisije, zlasti glede sporočila o spričevalu letalskega prevoznika, skupaj s priloženimi popolnimi specifikacijami dejavnosti, zahtevami in omejitvami.