natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In point 21.3, in the third column, protected zone(s), the words ‘A (Burgenland, Carinthia, Lower Austria, Tirol (administrative district Lienz), Styria and Vienna),’ are deleted.
v točki 21.3 se v tretjem stolpcu, varovano območje/območja, črtajo besede „A (Gradiščanska, Koroška, Spodnja Avstrija, Tirolska (upravno območje Lienz), Štajerska in Dunaj),“.
In point I.1.7.(b) of Part A, in the first column of the table, CN code, the code ‘ex44013090’ is replaced by ‘ex44013080’.
v točki I.1.7(b) dela A se v prvem stolpcu razpredelnice, oznaka KN, oznaka „ex44013090“ nadomesti z „ex44013080“;
In point I.6.(b) of Part B, the fourth entry
v točki I.6(b) dela B se četrti vnos
Sawdust’
Žagovina“
is replaced by
nadomesti z
Sawdust, not agglomerated in logs, briquettes, pellets or similar forms’
Žagovina, neaglomerirana v hlode, brikete, pelete ali podobne oblike“
In point I.6.(b) of Part B, in the first column of the table, CN code, the code ‘ex44013090’ is replaced by ‘ex44013080’.
v točki I.6(b) dela B se v prvem stolpcu razpredelnice, oznaka KN, oznaka „ex44013090“ nadomesti z „ex44013080“.
Council Directive 2009/119/EC
Direktiva Sveta 2009/119/ES
After consulting the European Data Protection Supervisor [3],
po posvetovanju z Evropskim varuhom osebnih podatkov [3],
The supply of crude oil and petroleum products to the Community remains very important, particularly for the transport sector and the chemicals industry.
Oskrba Skupnosti z nafto in naftnimi derivati je še vedno zelo pomembna, zlasti za prometni sektor in za kemično industrijo.
The increasing concentration of production, dwindling oil reserves and growing worldwide consumption of petroleum products are all contributing to an increased risk of supply difficulties.
Naraščajoča koncentracija proizvodnje, zmanjšanje zalog nafte in povečana svetovna poraba naftnih derivatov povečujejo nevarnost težav z oskrbo.
The European Council, in its Action Plan (2007 to 2009), entitled ‘Energy Policy for Europe’, underlined the need to enhance security of supply for the European Union (EU) as a whole and for each Member State, inter alia, by reviewing the Union’s oil stocks mechanisms, with special reference to the availability of oil in the event of a crisis.
Evropski svet je v akcijskem načrtu (2007–2009) z naslovom „Energetska politika za Evropo“ zlasti poudaril, da je treba izboljšati varnost oskrbe za Evropsko unijo (EU) kot celoto in za vsako državo članico, med drugim s ponovnim pregledom mehanizmov Unije za vzdrževanje zalog nafte, predvsem glede razpoložljivosti nafte v primeru krize.
That objective requires, among other things, greater convergence between the Community system and the system provided for by the International Energy Agency (hereinafter ‘the IEA’).
Ta cilj med drugim predpostavlja večje zbližanje med sistemom Skupnosti in sistemom, ki ga predvideva Mednarodna agencija za energijo.
Under Council Directive 2006/67/EC of 24 July 2006 imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products [4], stocks are calculated on the basis of average daily inland consumption during the previous calendar year.
V skladu z Direktivo Sveta 2006/67/ES z dne 24. julija 2006 o obveznosti držav članic glede vzdrževanja minimalnih zalog surove nafte in/ali naftnih derivatov [4] se zaloge izračunajo glede na povprečno dnevno domačo porabo v preteklem koledarskem letu.
However, stockholding obligations under the Agreement on an International Energy Programme of 18 November 1974 (hereinafter ‘the IEA Agreement’) are calculated on the basis of net imports of oil and petroleum products.
Nasprotno se obveznosti v skladu s Sporazumom o mednarodnem energetskem programu z dne 18. novembra 1974 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum Mednarodne agencije za energijo) izračunajo na podlagi neto uvoza nafte in naftnih derivatov.
For that reason, and owing to other differences in methodology, the way in which stockholding obligations and Community emergency stocks are calculated should be brought more into line with the calculation methods used under the IEA Agreement, notwithstanding the facts that the IEA calculation methods may have to be evaluated in light of technological improvements during the last decades, and that non-IEA members that are fully dependent on imports may require a longer period for adapting their stockholding obligations.
Zaradi tega in zaradi drugih razlik pri metodologiji je treba prilagoditi metodologijo izračunavanja obveznosti vzdrževanja zalog, pa tudi metodologijo izračunavanja varnostnih zalog Skupnosti, da bi ju približali tistim, ki se uporabljajo pri izvajanju Sporazuma Mednarodne agencije za energijo, ne glede na dejstvi, da bo treba metodologijo izračunavanja Mednarodne agencije za energijo morda oceniti glede na tehnološke izboljšave v zadnjih desetletjih in da lahko države, ki niso članice Mednarodne agencije za energijo in so v celoti odvisne od uvoza, zahtevajo daljše obdobje za prilagoditev svojih obveznosti vzdrževanja zalog.
Further amendments to the methods and procedures for calculating stock levels may prove necessary and beneficial in order to further increase coherence with IEA practice, including, for example, changes that lead to a lowering for certain Member States of the reduction percentage of 10 % applied in the calculation of stocks, that would allow a different treatment of naphtha stocks, or that would allow the stocks held in tankers in territorial waters of a Member State to be counted.
Zlasti se lahko izkaže, da so dodatne spremembe metod in postopkov za izračun višine zalog potrebne in koristne, da se še poveča skladnost s prakso Mednarodne agencije za energijo na primer vključno s spremembami, ki bi vodile k temu, da se zniža uporabljena stopnja znižanja 10 % pri izračunu zalog za nekatere države članice, s spremembami, ki bi omogočile drugačno obravnavo zalog primarnega bencina, ali s spremembami, ki bi omogočile upoštevanje zalog v tankerjih v ozemeljskih vodah države članice.
Indigenous production of oil can in itself contribute to security of supply and might therefore provide justification for oil-producing Member States to hold lower stocks than other Member States.
Lastna proizvodnja nafte sama po sebi prispeva k varnosti oskrbe in bi torej lahko upravičila to, da bi države članice proizvajalke nafte vzdrževale manjše zaloge kot druge države članice.
A derogation of that kind should not, however, result in stockholding obligations that differ substantially from those that apply under Directive 2006/67/EC.
Tako odstopanje pa ne bi smela povzročiti bistvene spremembe obveznosti vzdrževanja zalog v primerjavi s tistimi iz Direktive 2006/67/ES.
It therefore follows that the stockholding obligation for certain Member States should be set on the basis of inland oil consumption and not on the basis of imports.
Iz tega sledi, da bi morala biti za nekatere države članice obveznost vzdrževanja zalog določena glede na količino domače porabe nafte in ne glede na uvoz.
The Presidency Conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 8 and 9 March 2007 show that it is becoming increasingly vital and pressing for the Community to put in place an integrated energy policy, combining action at European and Member State level.
Sklepi predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Bruslju z dne 8. in 9. marca 2007 kažejo, da je vedno bolj pomembno in nujno, da Skupnost vzpostavi celostno energetsko politiko ter združi ukrepe, ki se uporabljajo na evropski ravni in na ravni držav članic.
It is therefore essential to ensure greater convergence in the standards secured by the stockholding mechanisms in place in the various Member States.
Zato je bistveno, da se zagotovi večje zbliževanje standardov, ki jih zagotavljajo mehanizmi za vzdrževanja zalog v različnih državah članicah.
The availability of oil stocks and the safeguarding of energy supply are essential elements of public security for Member States and for the Community.
Razpoložljivost zalog nafte in zaščita oskrbe z energijo sta bistvena dejavnika javne varnosti držav članic in Skupnosti.
The existence of central stockholding entities (CSEs) in the Community brings those goals closer.
Obstoj osrednjih organov za vzdrževanje zalog v Skupnosti omogoča približevanje k tem ciljem.
In order to allow the Member States concerned to make optimal use of national law to define the terms of reference for their CSEs while easing the financial burden placed on final consumers as a result of such stockholding activities, it is sufficient to prohibit the use of stocks for commercial purposes, while allowing stocks to be held in any location across the Community and by any CSE set up for that purpose.
Da bi zadevnim državam članicam omogočili kar najboljšo uporabo njihovega nacionalnega prava za opredelitev statusa njihovega osrednjega organa za vzdrževanje zalog, hkrati pa ublažili finančno breme vzdrževanja zalog za končne uporabnike, zadostuje, da se prepove uporaba zalog za komercialne namene, medtem ko se vzdrževanje zalog kjer koli v Skupnosti dovoli kateremu koli osrednjemu organu za vzdrževanje zalog..
Given the objectives of the Community legislation on oil stocks, possible security concerns which may be expressed by some Member States and the desire to make mechanisms for solidarity amongst Member States more rigorous and more transparent, it is necessary to focus as much as possible the operation of CSEs to their national territories.
Ob upoštevanju ciljev zakonodaje Skupnosti glede zalog nafte, morebitnih skrbi nekaterih držav članic v zvezi z varnostjo in želje po povečanju strogosti in preglednosti mehanizmov solidarnosti med državami članicami, je treba čim bolj osredotočiti dejavnosti osrednjih organov na njihovo nacionalno ozemlje.
It should be possible for oil stocks to be held at any location across the Community, provided that due account is taken of their physical accessibility.
Zaloge nafte bi moralo biti mogoče vzdrževati kjer koli v Skupnosti, če se ustrezno pazi na njihovo fizično dostopnost.
Consequently, economic operators on which such stockholding obligations fall should be able to discharge their obligations by delegation to other economic operators or any one of the CSEs.
Zato bi moralo biti gospodarskim subjektom, ki imajo obveznost vzdrževanja zalog omogočeno, da obveznost prenesejo na druge gospodarske subjekte ali na katerega od osrednjih organov za vzdrževanje zalog.
Furthermore, provided those obligations can be delegated to a freely chosen CSE located within the Community on payment of an amount limited to the cost of the services provided, the risk of discriminatory practices at national level will be reduced.
Poleg tega to, da se obveznosti lahko prenesejo svobodno izbranemu osrednjemu organu za vzdrževanje zalog na ozemlju Skupnosti za plačilo, ki je v mejah stroškov opravljenih storitev, vodi k zmanjšanju tveganja za diskriminacijske prakse na nacionalni ravni.
The right of an economic operator to delegate should not imply an obligation on the part of any actor to accept the delegation, unless this Directive requires otherwise.
Pravica gospodarskega subjekta do prenosa obveznosti ne bi smela pomeniti, da ima kateri koli subjekt dolžnost sprejeti prenese obveznosti, razen če ni to določeno v tej direktivi.
When Member States decide to limit operators' delegation rights, they should ensure that operators are guaranteed the right to delegate a certain minimum percentage of their obligation; those Member States should therefore ensure that their CSE will accept the delegation of the stockholding obligation in respect of the amount needed to guarantee that minimum percentage.
Če države članice odločijo, da subjektom omejijo pravice prenosa obveznosti, bi morale subjektom zagotoviti pravico, da prenesejo določen minimalni odstotni prag njihove obveznosti; te države članice bi morale zato zagotoviti, da bodo njihovi osrednji organi za vzdrževanje zalog sprejeli prenos obveznosti vzdrževanja zalog glede na znesek znesek, ki je potreben da se zagotovi minimalni odstotek.
Member States should ensure full availability of all stocks held pursuant to Community legislation.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti absolutno razpoložljivost vseh zalog, katerih vzdrževanje nalaga zakonodaja Skupnosti.
In order to guarantee that availability, there should be no restrictions or limitations on the right of ownership of those stocks that could hamper their use in case of oil supply disruption.
Da bi bila taka razpoložljivost zagotovljena, lastninska pravica do zalog ne bi smela trpeti nobenih omejitev, ki bi ovirale njihovo uporabo v primeru motenj pri oskrbi z nafto.
Petroleum products owned by companies facing a significant risk of enforcement proceedings against their assets should not be taken into account.
Naftni derivati podjetij, ki so izpostavljena resnim tveganjem postopkov izvršbe na njihovem premoženju, se ne bi smeli upoštevati.
Where a stockholding obligation has been imposed on operators, initiation of bankruptcy or settlement proceedings could be considered to demonstrate the existence of such a risk.
Če imajo gospodarski subjekti obveznost vzdrževanja zalog, bi se lahko začetek stečajnega postopka ali postopka prisilne poravnave štel kot opozorilno znamenje takega tveganega položaja.
In order to allow Member States to react quickly to cases of particular urgency or to local crises it might be appropriate to allow them to use a part of their stocks for such situations.
Da bi se države članice lahko hitro odzvale na še posebej nujne primere ali lokalne krize, bi bilo lahko ustrezno, da se jim v takšnih primeri dovoli uporabiti del njihovih zalog.
Such urgent cases or local crises would not include situations caused by price developments of crude oil or petroleum products, but could include disruptions in the supply of natural gas which require fuel switching, i.e. using crude oil or petroleum products as fuel for energy production.
Takšni nujni primeri ali lokalne krize ne bi vključevali razmer, ki jih povzročijo cenovna nihanja surove nafte ali naftnih derivatov, lahko pa bi vključevali motnje pri oskrbi z zemeljskim plinom, ki zahteva menjavo goriva, to je uporabo surove nafte ali naftnih derivatov kot gorivo za proizvodnjo energije.
In view of what is required in connection with setting up emergency policies, bringing about convergence in the standards secured by national stockholding mechanisms and ensuring a better overview of stock levels, particularly in the event of a crisis, Member States and the Community should have the means for reinforced control of those stocks.
Zaradi potreb, povezanih z vzpostavljanjem politik za izredne razmere, zbliževanjem standardov, ki jih zagotavljajo nacionalni mehanizmi za vzdrževanje zalog in potrebam po zagotavljanju boljšega pregleda nad ravnmi zalog zlasti v primeru krize, bi morale imeti države članice in Skupnost na voljo sredstva za okrepljeni nadzor nad zalogami.
Stocks held under bilateral agreements, or contractual rights to purchase certain volumes of stocks (tickets) that fulfil all obligations set by the current Directive, should form useful instruments compatible with this aim of greater convergence.
Zaloge, ki se hranijo na podlagi dvostranskih sporazumov ali pogodbenih pravic do nakupa določene količine zalog („kuponov“), ki izpolnjujejo vse obveznosti iz sedanje direktive, bi morale tvoriti koristne instrumente, ki so združljivi s tem ciljem večjega zbliževanja.
Ownership of a substantial part of those stocks by the Member States or the CSEs set up by the various national authorities should make it possible to increase the level of control and transparency, at least for that part of the stocks.
Lastništvo država članic ali osrednji organov za vzdrževanje zalog, ki jih ustanovijo različni nacionalni organi, nad večjim delom zalog, bi moralo omogočiti zaostreno stopnjo nadzora in preglednosti vsaj nad tem delom zalog.
To help enhance security of supply in the Community, the stocks, known as ‘specific stocks’, purchased by the Member States or the CSEs and constituted on the basis of decisions taken by the Member States should correspond to actual needs in the event of a crisis.
Da bi prispevali k večji varnosti oskrbe v Skupnosti, bi morale zaloge, ki jih imajo v lasti države članice ali osrednji organi za vzdrževanje zalog, tako imenovane „posebne zaloge“, vzpostavljene na podlagi odločitev, ki so jih sprejele države članice, ustrezati dejanskim potrebam v primeru krize.
They should also have separate legal status to ensure full availability should such a crisis occur.
Poleg tega bi bilo potrebno, da imajo lasten pravni status, ki zagotavlja njihovo polno razpoložljivost v primeru krize.
To that end, the Member States concerned should ensure that appropriate steps are taken to protect those stocks unconditionally against all enforcement measures.
Zato bi morale zadevne države članice paziti, da se sprejmejo potrebni ukrepi, da se zadevne zaloge brezpogojno zaščitijo pred vsemi ukrepi prisilne izvršbe.
At this stage, the volumes to be owned by the CSEs or the Member States should be set at a level determined independently and voluntarily by each of the Member States concerned.
Količine, ki jih imajo v lasti osrednji organi za vzdrževanje zalog ali države članice, bi morale biti na tej stopnji določene na ravni, ki jo neodvisno in prostovoljno določi vsaka od zadevnih držav članic.
Given the need to increase the level of control and transparency, emergency stocks that are not specific stocks should be subject to increased monitoring requirements and, in certain cases, Member States should be required to notify measures governing the availability of emergency stocks and any changes in the arrangements for maintaining them.
Ker je treba povečati stopnjo nadzora in preglednosti, bi bilo treba za varnostne zaloge, ki niso posebne zaloge, državam članicam predpisati strožje obveznosti za monitoring, v določenih primerih pa bi države članice izpolnjevale obveznosti obveščanja o ukrepih, s katerimi se upravlja razpoložljivost varnostnih zalog, in o razvoju določb v zvezi z njihovim vzdrževanjem.
Fluctuations in the volume of specific stocks due to individual stock replacement operations could be permissible in order to allow necessary operations such as those required for ensuring freshness of the stocks, for ensuring compliance with changed product specifications, or for issuing new tenders for storage.
Nihanja v količini posebnih zalog zaradi posamezne zamenjave zalog so dopustna, da se omogočijo operacije, kot so potrebne za osveževanjei zalog, zagotovitev skladnosti s spremembami v specifikacijah proizvodov ali objava novih razpisov za vzdrževanje zalog.
Where emergency stocks and specific stocks are commingled with other stocks held by economic operators, transparency of emergency stock levels should be emphasised.
Če so varnostne zaloge in posebne zaloge pomešane z drugimi zalogami, ki jih hranijo gospodarski subjekti, bi bilo treba poudariti preglednost količin varnostnih zalog.
The frequency with which stock summaries are drawn up and the deadline for their submission, as laid down by Directive 2006/67/EC, seem to be out of step with various oil stockholding systems that have been set up in other parts of the world.
Zdi se, da pogostost povzetka o zalogah in rok za njegovo predložitev, kot to določa Direktiva 2006/67/ES, nista usklajena z različnimi sistemi vzdrževanja zalog nafte, vzpostavljenimi v drugih delih sveta.
In a resolution on the macroeconomic impact of the increase in the price of energy, the European Parliament voiced its support for more frequent reporting.
V resoluciji o makroekonomskih posledicah višjih cen energije je Evropski parlament izrazil podporo sprejetju pogostejšega obveščanja.
In order to prevent double reporting with regard to the information to be provided by Member States on the different product categories, Regulation (EC) No 1099/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 on energy statistics [5] should serve as a point of reference for the different categories of petroleum products referred to in this Directive.
Da bi se izognili podvajanju poročil o različnih kategorijah derivatov, ki jih morajo zagotavljati države članice, bi morala Uredba (ES) št. 1099/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. oktobra 2008 o statistiki energetike [5] služiti kot referenca za različne kategorije naftnih derivatov iz te direktive.
In order to enhance security of supply, provide the markets with fuller information, reassure consumers about the state of oil stocks and optimise the way in which information is transmitted, provision should be made for possible subsequent amendment or clarification of the rules for the preparation and submission of statistical summaries.
Da bi povečali varnost oskrbe, popolneje obveščali trge, pomirili uporabnike glede stanja zalog nafte in optimizirali sredstva za prenos podatkov, je treba predvideti, da se lahko pozneje spremenijo in podrobneje določijo načini sestavljanja statističnih podatkov ter načini njihovega sporočanja.
With the same objectives in mind, the preparation and submission of statistical summaries should also be extended to stocks other than emergency stocks and specific stocks, with those summaries to be submitted on a monthly basis.
Isti cilji tudi narekujejo, da naj se sestavljanje in sporočanje statističnih podatkov razširi tudi na druge zaloge, ne le na varnostne in posebne zaloge, in da se določi, da se ti podatki predložijo enkrat na mesec.
As there may be errors or discrepancies in the summaries submitted to the Commission, the Commission’s employees or authorised agents should be able to review the emergency preparedness and stockholding of Member States.
Razlike in napake se lahko pojavijo pri podatkih, sporočenih Komisiji in zato bi moralo biti osebam, ki jih zaposlujejo ali pooblastijo službe Komisije, omogočeno pregledati pripravljenost na izredne razmere in vzdrževanje zalog držav članic.
Member States' national regimes should be relied upon to secure that such reviews can be conducted effectively in accordance with national procedures.
Pri zagotovitvi, da se takšni pregledi opravijo učinkovito in v skladu z nacionalnimi postopki, bi se bilo treba zanesti na nacionalne sisteme držav članic.
Complex electronic and statistical data processing should be carried out for the data received or collected.
Prejeti ali zbrani podatki bi morali biti podrobno računalniško in statistično obdelani.
This requires the use of integrated tools and procedures.
Za to je potrebna uporaba integriranih postopkov in orodij.
The Commission should therefore be able to take all appropriate measures to that effect, in particular developing new computer systems.
Komisija bi morala biti zato zmožna sprejeti vse primerne ukrepe v ta namen in zlasti razviti nov informacijski sistem.
The protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Member States is governed by Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [6], while the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Commission is governed by Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [7].
Varstvo posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v državah članicah ureja Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [6], varstvo posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v Komisiji pa Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [7].