natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Competent authorities can rely on them to seek advice any time they are confronted with a difficult issue that is not covered by these guidelines.
Pristojni organi se lahko nanjo zanesejo in poiščejo nasvete, kadar koli se srečajo s težkim vprašanjem, ki ni zajeto v teh smernicah.
National IMI coordinators are called upon to play a significant role in this respect.
Nacionalni koordinatorji IMI so pozvani, da pri tem prevzamejo pomembno vlogo.
A list of contacts in the data protection authorities is available on the data protection section of the IMI website.
Seznam stikov pri organih za varstvo podatkov je na voljo v oddelku o varstvu podatkov na spletni strani sistema IMI.
Competent authorities must also be aware that it might be necessary for them to notify their respective national data protection authorities before participating in IMI.
Pristojni organi morajo upoštevati tudi, da bodo morda morali pred vključitvijo v sistem IMI o tem obvestiti svoje nacionalne organe za varstvo podatkov.
In some Member States a prior authorisation might be necessary.
V nekaterih državah članicah je morda potrebna predhodna odobritev.
IMI coordinators should play an active coordinating role in contacting data protection authorities, when necessary.
Koordinatorji IMI morajo imeti dejavno usklajevalno vlogo pri navezovanju stikov z organi za varstvo podatkov, če je to potrebno.
Work in progress
Delo v teku
The following data protection-friendly improvements will be included in a future version of IMI during 2009:
Naslednje izboljšave, ki so prijazne varstvu podatkov, bodo vključene v prihodnjo različico sistema IMI v letu 2009:
Where the exchanges of information concern sensitive data (e.g. health data or criminal records or disciplinary measures), there will be a reminder that the information exchanged is sensitive and that the case handler should only request this information if absolutely necessary and directly related to the exercise of the professional activity or the performance of a given service.
če izmenjave informacij zadevajo občutljive podatke (npr. zdravstveni podatki ali kazenske evidence ali disciplinski ukrepi), bo obstajal opomnik, da so izmenjane informacije občutljive in da lahko odpravnik zadeve te informacije zahteva le, če so nujno potrebne in neposredno povezane z izvajanjem poklicne dejavnosti ali opravljanjem zadevne storitve;
An online procedure will be set up (along the lines of the one already in place for early deletion of data at the request of the competent authorities) for the rectification erasure or blocking of data which have been unlawfully processed or are inaccurate.
vzpostavljen bo spletni postopek (po vzoru že vzpostavljenega postopka za izbris podatkov na zahtevo pristojnih organov) za popravek, izbris ali blokiranje podatkov, ki so bili nezakonito obdelani ali so netočni;
There will be automated reminders and urgency lists to accept a response so that requests do not remain open longer than necessary.
obstajali bodo samodejni opomniki in seznami za nujne primere za sprejetje odgovora, da zahtevki ne ostanejo nerešeni dlje, kot je potrebno;
Appropriate measures to deal with new flows of information under the Services Directive - that is the alert mechanism and the case by case derogations.
ustrezni ukrepi za obravnavo novega pretoka informacij v okviru Direktive o storitvah, tj. mehanizem opozarjanja in odstopanja za vsak primer posebej.
As a general rule, these measures will follow the same approach designed for general exchanges of information, for example: reminders about the sensitive nature of these information flows, reminders to close alerts as soon as feasible and possible ways of informing individuals about the exchange of information and their rights to have access to the data and, if appropriate, to have it blocked, deleted or rectified.
Na splošno bo pri teh ukrepih upoštevan enak pristop, kot je zasnovan za splošne izmenjave informacij, na primer: opomniki za občutljivo naravo pretoka informacij, opomniki za izklop alarma takoj, ko je to izvedljivo, mogoči načini obveščanja posameznikov o izmenjavi informacij in njihovih pravicah do dostopa podatkov, ter, če je ustrezno, blokiranja, izbrisa ali popravka podatkov.
REVIEW CLAUSE
KLAVZULA O PREGLEDU
IMI is a pioneer information system and is still being developed.
Sistem IMI je pionirski informacijski sistem, ki se še vedno razvija.
The Commission is continuously gathering input from coordinators and competent authorities to improve the system and it is therefore likely that changes will be implemented in the coming months.
Komisija redno zbira prispevke koordinatorjev in pristojnih organov, da bi izboljšala sistem, zato je verjetno, da bodo spremembe izvedene v prihodnjih mesecih.
Some of them may have no data protection consequences - others may do so.
Nekatere ne bodo imele posledic za varstvo podatkov, medtem ko jih bodo nekatere morda imele.
These guidelines, therefore, are not set in stone and will need to be updated on the basis of the experience with the daily work of IMI.
Te smernice se zato lahko še vedno spremenijo in jih bo treba posodobiti na podlagi izkušenj pri vsakodnevnem delu s sistemom IMI.
Not later than one year after the adoption of this Recommendation, the Commission will draw up a report in which it will assess the situation, including the possibility of adopting another legal measure.
Komisija bo najpozneje eno leto po sprejetju tega priporočila pripravila poročilo, v katerem bo ocenila stanje, vključno z možnostjo sprejetja dodatnega pravnega ukrepa.
Members States should consider including information on data protection in their training actions on IMI.
Države članice bi morale proučiti možnost vključitve informacij o varstvu podatkov v svoje ukrepe usposabljanja v zvezi s sistemom IMI.
See Article 12 of Decision 2008/49/EC.
Glej člen 12 Odločbe 2008/49/ES.
Competent authorities may have other authorities ‘linked’ for supervision (e.g. a regional authority links a federal authority).
Pristojni organi se lahko pri izvajanju nadzora „povežejo“ z drugimi organi (npr. regionalni organ se poveže z zveznim organom).
These ‘linked authorities’ can in this way be made aware of the number and the nature of the requests but they have no access to the personal data of the service providers or the migrant professionals.
Na ta način so ti „povezani“ organi lahko obveščeni glede števila in narave zahtevkov, vendar nimajo dostopa do osebnih podatkov ponudnikov storitev ali strokovnjakov migrantov.
As provided for in Article 10(3) of Decision 2008/49/EC, the Commission may participate in information exchanges only in specific cases where the relevant Community act provides for information to be exchanged between Member States and the Commission.
Kot je določeno v členu 10(3) Odločbe 2008/49/ES, Komisija lahko sodeluje v izmenjavi informacij le v posebnih primerih, kadar ustrezni akt Skupnosti predvideva, da se informacije izmenjujejo med državami članicami in Komisijo.
Although in some Member States such as Italy, Luxembourg, Austria and Denmark the scope of data protection legislation also covers legal persons to a certain extent.
Čeprav v nekaterih državah članicah, kot so Italija, Luksemburg, Avstrija in Danska, zakonodaja o varstvu podatkov delno zajema tudi pravne osebe.
Directive 95/46/EC applies to the Member States whilst Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 applies to the European Institutions.
Direktiva 95/46/ES se uporablja za države članice, medtem ko se Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001 uporablja za evropske institucije.
For a legal definition see Article 8 of Directive 95/46/EC and Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.
Za pravno opredelitev glej člen 8 Direktive 95/46/ES in člen 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001.
i.e. appropriate information should be provided to the data subjects, processing should be proportionate, and data should not be further processed for purposes incompatible with its collection.
Tj. ustrezne informacije je treba zagotoviti osebam, na katere se podatki nanašajo, obdelava mora biti sorazmerna, podatki pa se ne smejo nadalje obdelati za namene, ki niso združljivi z zbiranjem teh podatkov.
A specific list of these questions is available on the IMI website:http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/imi-net/docs/questions_and_data_fields_en.pdf
Poseben seznam teh vprašanj je na voljo na spletni strani sistema IMI:http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/imi-net/docs/questions_and_data_fields_sl.pdf
The data protection section of the IMI website contains all the IMI specific data protection documents as well as a link to a list of all legislative documents on data protection at EU level:http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/imi-net/data_protection_en.html
Oddelek o varstvu podatkov na spletni strani IMI vključuje vse dokumente o varstvu podatkov, povezane z IMI, ter povezavo na seznam vseh zakonodajnih dokumentov o varstvu podatkov na ravni EU:http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/imi-net/data_protection_sl.html
Actors and users as well as their functions, rights and obligations are described in detail in Articles 6 to 12 of Decision 2008/49/EC.
Udeleženci in uporabniki, vključno z njihovimi funkcijami, pravicami in obveznostmi, so podrobno opisani v členih 6–12 Odločbe 2008/49/ES.
There is therefore no need for these guidelines to repeat these.
Zato jih v teh smernicah ni treba ponoviti.
The European Union has a solid data protection legal framework provided by this Directive and by Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 [6].
Evropska unija ima trden pravni okvir za varstvo podatkov, ki ga zagotavljata ta direktiva in Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001 [6].
The Data Protection Directive leaves some flexibility for Member States.
Direktiva o varstvu podatkov omogoča državam članicam določeno stopnjo prilagodljivosti.
In fact, there are only a few questions in the IMI question set that concern criminal records or other sensitive data [10].
V sklopu vprašanj sistema IMI je dejansko navedenih le nekaj vprašanj, ki zadevajo kazenske evidence ali druge občutljive podatke [10].
Beyond these limited cases, the exchange of sensitive data should only occur in those exceptional cases where the concrete circumstances of the case are such that the sensitive data are directly related to the pursuit of the activity in question and are absolutely necessary for the establishment of the legal claims.
Poleg teh omejenih primerov se lahko občutljivi podatki izmenjujejo le v izjemnih primerih, v katerih so dejanske okoliščine primera take, da so občutljivi podatki neposredno povezani z izvajanjem zadevne dejavnosti in so nujno potrebni za uveljavljanje pravnih zahtevkov.
It is possible that additional data protection safeguards may be necessary.
Morda bodo za varstvo podatkov potrebni dodatni zaščitni ukrepi.
These will be drawn up in consultation with the EDPS.
Pripravljeni bodo v posvetovanju z ENVP.
In these cases the Commission has similar obligations as if it were a competent authority.
V teh primerih ima Komisija podobne obveznosti kot pristojni organ.
For example, it needs to provide appropriate notice to the data subjects as well as access to their data if they so request.
Komisija mora na primer ustrezno obvestiti posameznike, na katere se podatki nanašajo, in jim na njihovo zahtevo omogočiti dostop do njihovih podatkov.
http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/imi-net/data_protection_en.html
http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/imi-net/data_protection_sl.html
http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/imi-net/docs/questions_and_data_fields_en.pdf
http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/imi-net/docs/questions_and_data_fields_sl.pdf
on remuneration policies in the financial services sector
o plačnih politikah v sektorju finančnih storitev
Excessive risk-taking in the financial services industry and in particular in banks and investment firms has contributed to the failure of financial undertakings and to systemic problems in the Member States and globally.
Pretirano tveganje v industriji finančnih storitev, še zlasti v bankah in investicijskih podjetjih, je prispevalo k propadu finančnih podjetij in sistemskim težavam v državah članicah in po svetu.
These problems have spread to the rest of the economy and led to high costs for society.
Te težave so se razširile na preostalo gospodarstvo in povzročile visoke stroške za družbo.
Whilst not the main cause of the financial crisis that unfolded in 2007 and 2008, there is a widespread consensus that inappropriate remuneration practices in the financial services industry also induced excessive risk-taking and thus contributed to significant losses of major financial undertakings.
Čeprav neustrezna plačna praksa ni glavni vzrok finančne krize, ki se je začela širiti v letih 2007 in 2008, je po soglasnem mnenju ta praksa tudi spodbudila pretirana tveganja v industriji finančnih storitev in s tem prispevala k velikim izgubam večjih finančnih podjetij.
Remuneration practices in a large part of the financial services industry have been running counter to effective and sound risk management.
Plačna praksa v večjem delu industrije finančnih storitev je v nasprotju z učinkovitim in dobrim obvladovanjem tveganja.
These practices tended to reward short-term profit and gave staff incentives to pursue unduly risky activities which provided higher income in the short term while exposing financial undertakings to higher potential losses in the longer term.
Njen namen je bilo nagrajevanje uslužbencev s kratkoročnimi dobički in dajanje spodbud za nadaljevanje neupravičeno tveganih dejavnosti, ki so kratkoročno ustvarjale večji prihodek, čeprav so finančna podjetja dolgoročno izpostavljale večjim morebitnim tveganjem.
In principle, if risk management and control systems were strong and highly effective, the risk-taking incentives provided by remuneration practices would be consistent with the risk tolerance of a financial undertaking.
Načeloma bi bile spodbude za tveganje, ki jih je zagotavljala plačna praksa, skladne z dovoljenim tveganjem finančnega podjetja, če bi bili obvladovanje tveganja in sistemi nadzora močni in visoko učinkoviti.
However, all risk management and control systems have limitations and, as the financial crisis has shown, can fail to deal with the risks created by inappropriate incentives, due to the increasing complexity of the risks and the range of ways by which risk may be taken.
Vendar so vsi sistemi obvladovanja tveganja in nadzora omejeni in so lahko, kot je pokazala finančna kriza, neuspešni pri obravnavanju tveganj, ustvarjenih z neustreznimi spodbudami, zaradi vse večje zapletenosti tveganj in vrste načinov prevzema tveganja.
Consequently, a simple functional separation between business units and staff responsible for risk management and control systems is necessary but no longer sufficient.
Zato je preprosta funkcijska ločitev med poslovnimi enotami in uslužbenci, odgovornimi za obvladovanje tveganja in sistemov nadzora, potrebna, a nič več zadostna.
Creating appropriate incentives within the remuneration system itself should reduce the burden on risk management and increase the likelihood that these systems become effective.
Ustvarjanje ustreznih spodbud v plačnem sistemu bi moralo zmanjšati obremenitev obvladovanja tveganja in povečati verjetnost, da ti sistemi postanejo znova učinkoviti.
Therefore, there is a need to establish principles on sound remuneration policies.
Zato je treba vzpostaviti načela o dobrih plačnih politikah.
Given the competitive pressures in the financial services industry and the fact that many financial undertakings operate cross-border, it is important to ensure that principles on sound remuneration policy are applied consistently throughout the Member States.
Glede na konkurenčne pritiske v industriji finančnih storitev in na to, da veliko finančnih podjetij posluje čez mejo, je pomembno zagotoviti, da se načela o dobri plačni politiki dosledno uporabljajo v vseh državah članicah.
However, it is acknowledged that to be more effective, principles on sound remuneration policy would need to be implemented globally and in a consistent manner.
Vendar je potrjeno, da je treba načela dobre plačne politike za večjo učinkovitost izvajati globalno in dosledno.
In its Communication to the Spring European Council ‘Driving European Recovery’ [1], the Commission presented its plan to restore and maintain a stable and reliable financial system.
V sporočilu spomladanskemu Evropskemu svetu „Spodbujanje okrevanja evropskega gospodarstva“ [1] je Komisija predstavila svoj načrt za vzpostavitev in ohranitev stabilnega in zanesljivega finančnega sistema.
In particular, the Communication announced that a new Recommendation on remuneration in the financial services sector would be presented in order to improve risk management in financial firms and align pay incentives with sustainable performance.
V sporočilu je zlasti napovedala, da bo predložila novo priporočilo o prejemkih v sektorju finančnih storitev za izboljšanje obvladovanja tveganja v finančnih podjetjih in uskladitev plačnih spodbud z vzdržno rastjo.
This Recommendation sets out general principles applicable to remuneration policy in the financial services sector and should apply to all financial undertakings operating in the financial services industry.
V tem priporočilu so določena splošna načela plačne politike, ki veljajo v sektorju finančnih storitev in bi se morala uporabljati v vseh finančnih podjetjih, dejavnih v industriji finančnih storitev.
Those general principles may be of more relevance to certain categories of financial undertakings than others, in the light of existing regulations and common practices in the financial services industry.
Ta splošna načela so lahko z vidika veljavnih predpisov in splošne prakse v industriji finančnih storitev pomembnejša za določene skupine finančnih podjetij kot za druge.
These principles should apply in parallel to any rule or regulation governing a specific financial sector.
Ta načela bi se morala uporabljati hkrati s katerim koli pravilom ali predpisom, ki ureja posebni finančni sektor.
In particular, fees and commissions received by intermediaries and external service providers in case of outsourced activities should not be addressed, since the compensation practices relating to such fees and commissions are already partially covered by particular regimes, in particular Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments [2] and Directive 2002/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 December 2002 on insurance mediation [3].
Še zlasti provizij posrednikov in zunanjih ponudnikov storitev pri dejavnostih, oddanih zunanjim izvajalcem, ne bi smeli obravnavati, saj so postopki nadomestila za to provizijo že delno vključeni v posamezne sisteme, še zlasti v Direktivi 2004/39/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o trgih finančnih instrumentov [2] in Direktivi 2002/92/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. decembra 2002 o zavarovalnem posredovanju [3].
Furthermore, this Recommendation is without prejudice to the rights, where applicable, of social partners in collective bargaining.
Poleg tega to priporočilo ne vpliva na pravice, če je to primerno, socialnih partnerjev pri kolektivnih pogajanjih.
With respect to financial undertakings whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market within the meaning of Directive 2004/39/EC in one or more Member States, this Recommendation apply in addition to and together with Commission Recommendation 2004/913/EC of 14 December 2004 fostering an appropriate regime for the remuneration of directors of listed companies [4] and Commission Recommendation 2009/385/EC of 30 April 2009 complementing Recommendations 2004/913/EC and 2005/162/EC as regards the regime for the remuneration of directors of listed companies [5].
Pri finančnih podjetjih, katerih vrednostni papirji so sprejeti v trgovanje na reguliranem trgu v smislu Direktive 2004/39/ES v eni ali več državah članicah, se to priporočilo uporablja poleg priporočila in skupaj s priporočilom Komisije 2004/913/ES z dne 14. decembra 2004 o spodbujanju ustreznega sistema prejemkov direktorjev javnih družb [4] in priporočilom Komisije 2009/385/ES z dne 30. aprila 2009, ki dopolnjuje priporočili 2004/913/ES in 2005/162/ES glede sistema prejemkov direktorjev javnih družb [5].
The remuneration policy of a particular financial undertaking should also be linked to the size of the financial undertaking concerned, as well as the nature and the complexity of its activities.
Plačna politika posameznega finančnega podjetja bi morala biti povezana tudi z velikostjo zadevnega podjetja ter naravo in zahtevnostjo njegovih dejavnosti.
A risk-focused remuneration policy, which is consistent with effective risk management and does not entail excessive risk exposure, should be adopted.
Treba je sprejeti plačno politiko, osredotočeno na tveganja, ki je v skladu z učinkovitim obvladovanjem tveganja in ne povzroča pretirane izpostavljenosti tveganju.
Remuneration policy should cover those categories of staff whose professional activities have a material impact on the risk profile of the financial undertaking.
Plačna politika bi morala vključevati tiste skupine uslužbencev, katerih strokovne dejavnosti materialno vplivajo na profil tveganja finančnega podjetja.
In order to avoid incentives for excessive risk-taking, special arrangements should be adopted with regard to the remuneration of these categories of staff.
Da bi se izognili pretirano tveganim spodbudam, je treba sprejeti posebne predpise o prejemkih teh skupin uslužbencev.
Remuneration policy should aim at aligning the personal objectives of staff members with the long-term interests of the financial undertaking concerned.
Namen plačne politike bi moral biti uskladitev osebnih ciljev uslužbencev z dolgoročnim interesom zadevnega finančnega podjetja.
The assessment of the performance-based components of remuneration should be based on longer-term performance and take into account the outstanding risks associated with the performance.
Ocena dela prejemka, ki je vezan na uspešnost, bi morala temeljiti na dolgoročnejši uspešnosti in upoštevati izredno tveganje, povezano z uspešnostjo.
The assessment of performance should be set in a multi-year framework, for example of three to five years, in order to ensure that the assessment process is based on longer term performance and that the actual payment of performance-based components of remuneration is spread over the business cycle of the company.
Oceno uspešnosti je treba določiti za večletni okvir, na primer za tri do pet let, za zagotovitev, da ocenjevanje temelji na dolgoročnejši uspešnosti in je dejansko plačilo dela plače, vezanega na uspešnost, razširjeno po celotnem poslovnem ciklu podjetja.
Financial undertakings should be able to reclaim variable components of remuneration that were awarded for performance based on data which has subsequently proven to be manifestly misstated.
Finančna podjetja bi morala biti sposobna zahtevati povračilo variabilnega dela prejemka, dodeljenega za uspešnost na podlagi podatkov, ki so se pozneje izkazali za napačne.
As a general principle, payments related to early termination of a contract which are awarded on a contractual basis should not be a reward for failure.
Na splošno plačila, vezana na predčasno prekinitev pogodbe, ki se dodelijo na pogodbeni podlagi, ne bi smela biti nagrada za neuspešnost.
For directors of listed financial undertakings, specific provisions on termination payments set out in Recommendation 2009/385/EC should apply.
Za direktorje finančnih podjetij, ki kotirajo na borzi, je treba uporabljati posebne določbe o odpravnini, določene v Priporočilu Komisije 2009/385/ES.