natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
National law concerning the protection of animals at the time of slaughter or killing has an impact on competition and, accordingly, on the operation of the internal market in products of animal origin included in Annex I to the Treaty establishing the European Community.
Nacionalna zakonodaja v zvezi z zaščito živali pri zakolu ali usmrtitvi vpliva na konkurenco in s tem na delovanje notranjega trga proizvodov živalskega porekla iz Priloge I k Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti.
It is necessary to establish common rules in order to ensure the rational development of the internal market in those products.
Treba je vzpostaviti skupna pravila, da se zagotovi racionalen razvoj notranjega trga z navedenimi proizvodi.
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), established by Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety [4], has adopted two opinions on the welfare aspects of the main systems of stunning and killing of certain species of animals, namely on the welfare aspects of the main systems of stunning and killing the main commercial species of animals, in 2004, and on the welfare aspects of the main systems of stunning and killing applied to commercially farmed deer, goats, rabbits, ostriches, ducks, geese and quail, in 2006.
(6) Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (EFSA), ustanovljena z Uredbo (ES) št. 178/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2002 o določitvi splošnih načel in zahtevah živilske zakonodaje, ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost hrane in postopkih, ki zadevajo varnost hrane [4] je sprejela dve mnenji o vidikih dobrega počutja živali pri glavnih sistemih omamljanja in usmrtitve nekaterih vrst živali, in sicer o vidikih dobrega počutja živali pri glavnih sistemih omamljanja in usmrtitve glavnih tržnih vrst živali v letu 2004 in o vidikih dobrega počutja živali pri glavnih sistemih omamljanja in usmrtitve, uporabljenih pri tržno gojeni srnjadi, kozah, zajcih, nojih, racah, goseh in prepelicah v letu 2006.
Community law in this area should be updated to take into account those scientific opinions.
Zakonodajo Skupnosti na tem področju bi bilo treba posodobiti ob upoštevanju teh znanstvenih mnenj.
Recommendations to phase out the use of carbon dioxide for pigs and the use of waterbath stunners for poultry are not included in this Regulation because the impact assessment revealed that such recommendations were not economically viable at present in the EU.
V to uredbo nista vključeni priporočili za postopno opustitev uporabe ogljikovega dioksida pri prašičih in uporabe bazenov z vodo za omamljanje perutnine, saj je bilo v okviru ocene učinka ugotovljeno, da trenutno v EU te priporočili nista ekonomsko upravičeni.
However, it is important to continue this discussion in the future.
Vendar je pomembno, da se s to razpravo nadaljuje tudi v prihodnje.
To this end, the Commission should prepare and submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the various stunning methods for poultry, and in particular multiple-bird waterbath stunners.
Komisija bi morala v ta namen pripraviti in predložiti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poročilo o različnih metodah omamljanja perutnine in zlasti glede večdelnih bazenov z vodo za omamljanje.
Furthermore, other recommendations should be excluded from this Regulation because they refer to technical parameters that should be part of implementing measures or Community guidelines.
Tudi druga priporočila bi morala biti izključena iz te uredbe, ker se nanašajo na tehnične parametre, ki bi morali biti del izvedbenih ukrepov ali smernic Skupnosti.
Recommendations on farm fish are not included in this Regulation because there is a need for further scientific opinion and economic evaluation in this field.
Priporočila za farmsko gojene ribe niso vključena v to uredbo, saj sta na tem področju potrebna nadaljnje znanstveno mnenje in ekonomska ocena.
In 2007, the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) adopted the Terrestrial Animal Health Code which includes guidelines for the slaughter of animals and for the killing of animals for disease control purposes.
Svetovna organizacija za zdravje živali (OIE) je leta 2007 sprejela Zoosanitarni kodeks za kopenske živali, ki vključuje smernice za zakol in usmrtitev živali za namene obvladovanja bolezni.
Those international guidelines contain recommendations concerning the handling, restraining, stunning and bleeding of animals in slaughterhouses and the killing of animals in cases of outbreak of contagious diseases.
Navedene mednarodne smernice vsebujejo priporočila glede ravnanja z živalmi, omejitve premikanja, omamljanja in izkrvavitve živali v klavnicah ter usmrtitve živali v primeru izbruha nalezljivih bolezni.
Those international standards should also be taken into account in this Regulation.
Te mednarodne standarde bi bilo prav tako treba upoštevati v tej uredbi.
Since the adoption of Directive 93/119/EC, Community food safety legislation applicable to slaughterhouses has been profoundly amended by the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on hygiene of foodstuffs [5] and Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin [6].
Zakonodaja Skupnosti o varnosti živil, ki se uporablja za klavnice, je bila od sprejetja Direktive 93/119/ES bistveno spremenjena s sprejetjem Uredbe (ES) št. 852/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o higieni živil [5] ter Uredbe (ES) št. 853/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o posebnih higienskih pravilih za živila živalskega izvora [6].
Those Regulations emphasise the responsibility of food business operators to ensure food safety.
Navedeni uredbi poudarjata odgovornost nosilcev živilske dejavnosti za zagotovitev varnosti živil.
Slaughterhouses are also subject to a pre-approval procedure whereby the construction, layout and equipment are examined by the competent authority to ensure that they comply with the corresponding technical rules on food safety.
Tudi za klavnice se uporablja postopek predhodne odobritve, pri čemer pristojni organ pregleda gradnjo, ureditev in opremo, da se zagotovi njihova skladnost z ustreznimi tehničnimi pravili o varnosti živil.
Animal welfare concerns should be better integrated into slaughterhouses, their construction and layout, as well as the equipment used therein.
Vprašanja v zvezi z dobrim počutjem živali bi morala biti bolje upoštevana v klavnicah, pri njihovi gradnji, ureditvi in opremi, ki se v njih uporablja.
Official controls in the food chain have also been reorganised by the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules [7] and Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption [8].
Uradni nadzor v živilski verigi je bil prav tako spremenjen s sprejetjem Uredbe (ES) št. 882/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o izvajanju uradnega nadzora, da se zagotovi preverjanje skladnosti z zakonodajo o krmi in živilih ter s pravili o zdravstvenem varstvu živali in zaščiti živali [7], ter Uredbe (ES) št. 854/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o določitvi posebnih predpisov za organizacijo uradnega nadzora proizvodov živalskega izvora, namenjenih za prehrano ljudi [8].
Conditions under which animals kept for farming purposes are killed have a direct or indirect impact on the market for food, feed or other products and on the competitiveness of the business operators concerned.
Pogoji, pod katerimi so gojene živali usmrčene, neposredno ali posredno vplivajo na trg živil, krme ali drugih proizvodov in konkurenčnost zadevnih nosilcev dejavnosti.
Therefore, such killing operations should be covered by Community law.
Zato bi morala tovrstne usmrtitve urejati zakonodaja Skupnosti.
However, traditionally farmed species such as horses, donkeys, cattle, sheep, goats or pigs can also be kept for other purposes, such as, for example, pets, animals for shows, work purposes, or sports.
Vendar so tradicionalno gojene vrste, kot so konji, osli, govedo, ovce, koze ali prašiči, lahko rejene tudi za druge namene, na primer kot hišne živali, živali za prireditve, živali za pomoč pri delu ali živali za šport.
Where the killing of animals of such species produces food or other products, those operations should fall within the scope of this Regulation.
Kadar so živali takšnih vrst usmrčene za proizvodnjo živil ali drugih proizvodov, bi se navedene dejavnosti morale vključiti v področje uporabe te uredbe.
Consequently, the killing of wild or stray animals for population control purposes should not fall within the scope of this Regulation.
Posledično usmrtitev divjih ali potepuških živali za namene uravnavanja populacije ne bi smela biti vključena v področje uporabe te uredbe.
Fish present substantial physiological differences from terrestrial animals and farmed fish are slaughtered and killed in a very different context, in particular as regards the inspection process.
Ribe se po fiziologiji bistveno razlikujejo od kopenskih živali, zakol in usmrtitev farmsko gojenih rib pa poteka v popolnoma drugačnem okviru, zlasti kar zadeva inšpekcijo.
Furthermore, research on the stunning of fish is far less developed than for other farmed species.
Poleg tega je omamljanje rib veliko manj raziskano področje kot omamljanje drugih gojenih vrst.
Separate standards should be established on the protection of fish at killing.
Za zaščito rib pri usmrtitvi bi bilo treba vzpostaviti ločene standarde.
Therefore, provisions applicable to fish should, at present, be limited to the key principle.
Zato bi bilo treba določbe, ki se uporabljajo za ribe, zaenkrat omejiti na glavno načelo.
Further initiatives by the Community should be based on a scientific risk assessment for the slaughter and killing of fish performed by EFSA and taking into account the social, economic and administrative implications.
Nadaljnje pobude Skupnosti bi morale temeljiti na znanstveni oceni tveganja za zakol ali usmrtitev rib, ki jo izvede EFSA, in ob upoštevanju socialnih, ekonomskih in upravnih posledic.
It is an ethical duty to kill productive animals which are in severe pain where there is no economically viable way to alleviate such pain.
Usmrtitev proizvodnih živali, ki trpijo hude bolečine, je etična dolžnost, kadar takšnih bolečin ni mogoče olajšati na ekonomsko upravičen način.
In most cases, animals can be killed respecting proper welfare conditions.
V večini primerov se živali lahko usmrtijo ob upoštevanju ustreznih pogojev za dobro počutje živali.
However, under exceptional circumstances, such as accidents in remote locations, where competent personnel and equipment cannot reach the animals, complying with optimal welfare rules could prolong their suffering.
V izjemnih primerih, kot so nesreče na oddaljenih krajih, kjer strokovno osebje z opremo živali ne more doseči, pa lahko upoštevanje pravil za optimalno dobro počutje podaljšuje trpljenje živali.
In the interest of the animals it is, therefore, appropriate to exclude emergency killing from the application of certain provisions of this Regulation.
Za dobro živali je zato primerno, da se usmrtitev v nujnih primerih izključi iz uporabe nekaterih določb te uredbe.
Occasionally animals can be dangerous for human beings, possibly putting human life at risk, inflicting serious injuries or transmitting deadly diseases.
Živali so občasno lahko ljudem nevarne, lahko celo ogrozijo človeška življenja, zadajo resne poškodbe ali prenesejo smrtonosne bolezni.
Preventing those risks is usually performed through the proper restraining of animals but it may also be necessary to kill dangerous animals to end such risks in certain circumstances.
Navedena tveganja se običajno preprečujejo z omejitvijo premikanja živali, vendar pa je za odpravo takšnih tveganj v nekaterih primerih morda treba nevarne živali tudi usmrtiti.
Under those circumstances, the killing cannot always be performed under the best welfare conditions due to the emergency.
V navedenih primerih živali zaradi nujnosti primerov ni vedno možno usmrtiti v skladu s pogoji za dobro počutje živali.
Therefore, it is necessary to derogate from the obligation to stun or immediately kill the animals in those cases.
Zato je v navedenih primerih treba uvesti odstopanje od obveznega omamljanja ali takojšnje usmrtitve živali.
Hunting or recreational fishing activities take place in a context where conditions of killing are very different from the ones used for farmed animals and hunting is subject to specific legislation.
Pri lovu ali športnem ribolovu se pogoji za usmrtitev močno razlikujejo od pogojev, ki se uporabljajo za gojene živali, za lov pa velja posebna zakonodaja.
It is therefore appropriate to exclude killings taking place during hunting or recreational fishing from the scope of this Regulation.
Zato je usmrtitve v okviru lova ali športnega ribolova primerno izključiti iz področja uporabe te uredbe.
Protocol No (33) underlines the need to respect the legislative or administrative provisions and customs of the Member States relating, in particular, to religious rites, cultural traditions and regional heritage when formulating and implementing the Community’s policies on, inter alia, agriculture and the internal market.
Protokol (št. 33) prav tako poudarja potrebo po spoštovanju zakonodajnih ali upravnih določb in običajev držav članic, zlasti v zvezi z verskimi obredi, kulturnimi tradicijami in regionalno dediščino, pri oblikovanju in izvajanju politik Skupnosti, med drugim na področju kmetijstva in notranjega trga.
It is therefore appropriate to exclude from the scope of this Regulation cultural events, where compliance with animal welfare requirements would adversely affect the very nature of the event concerned.
Zato je iz področja uporabe te uredbe primerno izključiti kulturne dogodke, pri katerih bi spoštovanje zahtev glede dobrega počutja živali negativno vplivalo na samo naravo dogodka.
In addition, cultural traditions refer to an inherited, established, or customary pattern of thought, action or behaviour which includes in fact the concept of something transmitted by, or acquired from, a predecessor.
Kulturne tradicije poleg tega predstavljajo podedovan, ustaljen ali običajen vzorec mišljenja, delovanja ali obnašanja, ki dejansko pomeni koncept nečesa, kar nam prenesejo ali nas naučijo predniki.
They contribute to fostering long-standing social links between generations.
Prispevajo h krepitvi dolgotrajnih socialnih vezi med generacijami.
Provided that those activities do not affect the market of products of animal origin and are not motivated by production purposes, it is appropriate to exclude the killing of animals taking place during those events from the scope of this Regulation.
Usmrtitve živali v okviru navedenih dogodkov je primerno izključiti iz področja uporabe te uredbe, pod pogojem, da navedene dejavnosti ne vplivajo na trg proizvodov živalskega porekla in se ne izvajajo za proizvodne namene.
The slaughter of poultry, rabbits and hares for private domestic consumption is not performed on a scale likely to affect the competitiveness of commercial slaughterhouses.
Zakol perutnine, kuncev in zajcev za zasebno domačo porabo se ne izvaja v tolikšni meri, da bi lahko vplival na konkurenčnost tržnih klavnic.
Similarly, the necessary efforts required from public authorities to detect and control such operations would not be proportionate to the potential problems to be solved.
Poleg tega ukrepi, ki jih javni organi morajo izvajati za odkrivanje in nadzorovanje takšnih dejavnosti, ne bi bili sorazmerni z morebitnimi težavami, ki bi jih bilo treba odpraviti.
It is, therefore, appropriate to exclude those operations from the scope of this Regulation.
Zato je navedene dejavnosti primerno izključiti iz področja uporabe te uredbe.
Derogation from stunning in case of religious slaughter taking place in slaughterhouses was granted by Directive 93/119/EC.
Odstopanje od omamljanja v primeru ritualnega zakola v klavnicah je bilo odobreno z Direktivo 93/119/ES.
Since Community provisions applicable to religious slaughter have been transposed differently depending on national contexts and considering that national rules take into account dimensions that go beyond the purpose of this Regulation, it is important that derogation from stunning animals prior to slaughter should be maintained, leaving, however, a certain level of subsidiarity to each Member State.
Ker so bile določbe Skupnosti, ki se uporabljajo za ritualni zakol, glede na nacionalni okvir različno prenesene v nacionalno zakonodajo, in ker nacionalna pravila vključujejo razsežnosti, ki presegajo namen te uredbe, je pomembno, da bi se ohranilo odstopanje od omamljanja živali pred zakolom, vendar pri tem vsaka država članica ohrani določeno raven subsidiarnosti.
As a consequence, this Regulation respects the freedom of religion and the right to manifest religion or belief in worship, teaching, practice and observance, as enshrined in Article 10 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Tako ta uredba spoštuje svobodo vere in pravico izražanja vere ali prepričanja pri bogoslužju, pouku, običajih in obredih, kot je navedeno v členu 10 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije.
There is sufficient scientific evidence to demonstrate that vertebrate animals are sentient beings which should therefore fall within the scope of this Regulation.
Obstajajo zadostni znanstveni dokazi, da so vretenčarji čuteča bitja, ki bi morala biti zajeta v področje uporabe te uredbe.
Reptiles and amphibians, however, are not animals commonly farmed in the Community and it would not, therefore, be appropriate or proportionate to include them within its scope.
Plazilci in dvoživke pa se v Skupnosti običajno ne gojijo, zato jih ne bi bilo primerno ali sorazmerno vključiti v področje uporabe te uredbe.
Many killing methods are painful for animals.
Veliko metod usmrtitev živalim povzroča bolečino.
Stunning is therefore necessary to induce a lack of consciousness and sensibility before, or at the same time as, the animals are killed.
Zato je omamljanje potrebno, da se pred ali med usmrtitvijo živali zmanjšata zavest in občutljivost.
Measuring the lack of consciousness and sensibility of an animal is complex and needs to be performed under scientifically approved methodology.
Merjenje izgube zavesti in občutljivosti živali je kompleksno in ga je treba izvajati v skladu z znanstveno odobreno metodologijo.
Monitoring through indicators, however, should be carried out to evaluate the efficiency of the procedure under practical conditions.
S spremljanjem na podlagi kazalnikov bi bilo treba oceniti učinkovitost postopka v praktičnih razmerah.
Monitoring stunning efficiency is mainly based on the evaluation of consciousness and sensibility of the animals.
Spremljanje učinkovitosti omamljanja v glavnem temelji na oceni zavesti in občutljivosti živali.
The consciousness of an animal is essentially its ability to feel emotions and control its voluntary mobility.
Zavest živali je v bistvu njena zmožnost, da čuti in nadzoruje hotno gibanje.
Despite some exceptions, such as electro-immobilisations or other provoked paralysis, an animal can be presumed to be unconscious when it loses its natural standing position, is not awake and does not show signs of positive or negative emotions such as fear or excitement.
Kljub nekaterim izjemam, kot so imobilizacije z električnim tokom ali drugače povzročena ohromelost, se lahko predvideva, da je žival nezavestna, kadar ni več v svojem naravnem stoječem položaju, ni budna in ne kaže pozitivnih ali negativnih čustev, kot sta strah ali razburjenje.
Sensibility of an animal is essentially its ability to feel pain.
Občutljivost živali je v bistvu njena zmožnost, da občuti bolečino.
In general, an animal can be presumed to be insensitive when it does not show any reflexes or reactions to stimulus such as sound, odour, light or physical contact.
Na splošno se lahko predvideva, da je žival neobčutljiva, kadar nima refleksov ali se ne odziva na dražljaje, kot so zvok, vonj, svetloba ali dotik.
New stunning methods are regularly developed and proposed on the market in order to face the new challenges of the farming and meat industry.
Nove metode omamljanja se na trgu redno razvijajo in predlagajo, tako da se je mogoče spopasti z novimi zahtevami kmetijske in mesne industrije.
It is, therefore, important to authorise the Commission to approve new stunning methods while keeping a uniform and high level of protection for animals.
Zato je pomembno, da Skupnost Komisijo pooblasti, da odobri nove metode omamljanja ob ohranitvi enotne in visoke ravni zaščite živali.
Community guidelines are a useful tool to provide business operators and competent authorities with specific information on the parameters to be used in order to ensure a high level of protection for animals while keeping a level playing field for business operators.
Smernice Skupnosti so uporabno orodje, s katerim se nosilcem dejavnosti in pristojnim organom zagotavljajo posebne informacije o parametrih, ki jih je treba uporabiti za zagotovitev visoke ravni zaščite živali ob ohranjanju enakih pogojev za nosilce dejavnosti.
It is, therefore, necessary to authorise the Commission to draw up such guidelines.
Zato je nujno, da Skupnost Komisijo pooblasti za pripravo takšnih smernic.
Depending on how they are used during the slaughtering or killing process, some stunning methods can lead to death while avoiding pain and minimising distress or suffering for the animals.
Nekatere metode omamljanja, odvisno od njihove uporabe pri zakolu ali usmrtitvi, lahko privedejo do smrti brez bolečin, žival pa je pri tem manj vznemirjena in manj trpi.
Other stunning methods may not lead to death and the animals may recover their consciousness or sensibility during subsequent painful procedures.
Druge metode omamljanja morda ne privedejo do smrti, živali pa lahko ponovno pridejo k zavesti ali postanejo občutljive med nadaljnjim bolečim postopkom.
Such methods should, therefore, be completed by other techniques that lead to certain death before the recovery of the animals.
Te metode bi bilo zato treba dopolniti z drugimi tehnikami, ki povzročijo gotovo smrt, še preden živali ponovno pridejo k zavesti.
It is, therefore, essential to specify which stunning methods need to be completed by a killing method.
Zato je bistveno natančno opredeliti, katere metode omamljanja je treba dopolniti z metodo usmrtitve.
The conditions under which animals are stunned and the results of such stunning vary in practice due to many factors.
Pogoji, pod katerimi se živali omamljajo, in rezultati takšnega omamljanja se v praksi razlikujejo zaradi mnogih dejavnikov.
Regular assessment of the outcome of stunning should therefore be made.
Zato bi bilo treba redno ocenjevati rezultate omamljanja.
For that purpose, business operators should establish a representative sample to check the efficiency of their stunning practices, taking into account the homogeneity of the group of animals, and other critical factors, such as the equipment used and the personnel involved.
V ta namen bi morali nosilci dejavnosti določiti reprezentativni vzorec za preverjanje učinkovitosti svojih praks omamljanja, ob upoštevanju homogenosti skupine živali ter drugih pomembnih dejavnikov, kot sta uporabljena oprema in osebje, ki pri tem sodeluje.
Some stunning protocols may prove to be sufficiently reliable to irreversibly kill the animals in all circumstances if specific key parameters are applied.
Lahko se dokaže, da so nekateri protokoli omamljanja dovolj zanesljivi, da živali dokončno usmrtijo v vseh okoliščinah, če se upoštevajo posebni glavni parametri.