natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In implementing this Directive, Member States are bound to respect the principle of Community preference as expressed, in particular, in the relevant provisions of the Acts of Accession of 2003 and 2005.
Države članice morajo pri izvajanju te direktive spoštovati načelo prednostne obravnave v Skupnosti, kot je določeno zlasti v ustreznih določbah Aktov o pristopu iz 2003 in 2005.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 19 June 2011.
Države članice uveljavijo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, do 19. junija 2011.
Commission Directive 2009/51/EC
Direktiva Komisije 2009/51/ES
amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards the specification of the active substance nicosulfuron
o spremembi Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS glede specifikacije nikosulfurona kot aktivne snovi
After a review in which the United Kingdom acted as rapporteur Member State, Commission Directive 2008/40/EC [2] included the active substance nicosulfuron in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Po pregledu, pri katerem je imelo Združeno kraljestvo vlogo države članice poročevalke, je bila aktivna snov nikosulfuron z Direktivo Komisije 2008/40/ES [2] dodana Prilogi I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
As regards purity, Directive 2008/40/EC sets a minimum level of 930 g/kg.
Direktiva 2008/40/ES določa najnižjo stopnjo čistosti pri 930 g/kg.
That level was based on the specification submitted by the notifier.
Navedena stopnja je temeljila na specifikaciji, ki jo je predložil prijavitelj.
However, it is the usual practice to base the level of minimum purity on specifications drafted by the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) of the United Nations as regards purity and levels of impurity contained in active substances.
Običajna praksa je, da najnižja stopnja čistosti temelji na specifikacijah, ki jih v zvezi s čistostjo in stopnjami nečistoč v aktivnih snoveh pripravi Organizacija Združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo (FAO).
The FAO specification on nicosulfuron [3] gives the minimum purity of 910 g/kg.
Specifikacija FAO o nikosulfuronu [3] določa najnižjo čistost pri 910 g/kg.
That specification was included in the assessment report which was peer reviewed by the Member States and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and presented to the Commission on 29 November 2007 for nicosulfuron, in the format of the EFSA Scientific Report [4].
Navedena specifikacija je bila vključena v poročilo o oceni, ki so jo strokovno pregledale države članice in Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (EFSA) in ki je bila 29. novembra 2007 predstavljena Komisiji za nikosulfuron v obliki znanstvenega poročila EFSA [4].
Although the Community is entitled to set its own level of protection for public health, animal health and the environment, it is the general practice to use the FAO levels.
Čeprav ima Skupnost pravico določati svoje lastne stopnje za varovanje zdravja ljudi in živali ter okolja, se v skladu s splošno prakso uporabljajo stopnje FAO.
To allow other producers complying with the FAO level to market their products, it is necessary to adapt the specification accordingly.
Da se ostalim proizvajalcem omogoči trženje proizvodov v skladu z stopnjami FAO, je treba specifikacijo ustrezno prilagoditi.
It is therefore justified to modify the minimum purity for nicosulfuron.
Zato je upravičeno, da se najnižja čistost nikosulfurona spremeni.
Since Article 2 of Directive 2008/40/EC requires Member States to apply the provisions implementing that Directive from 1 July 2009, the amended specification for nicosulfuron should also apply from this date, without prejudice to the other deadlines laid down by Article 3 of Directive 2008/40/EC.
Ker člen 2 Direktive 2008/40/ES zahteva, da države članice uporabljajo predpise iz navedene direktive od 1. julija 2009, se mora tudi spremenjena specifikacija za nikosulfuron uporabljati od tega datuma, brez poseganja v ostale roke iz člena 3 Direktive 2008/40/ES.
As a consequence, this Directive should enter into force as quickly as possible.
Ta direktiva mora torej začeti veljati čim prej.
In line 176 (nicosulfuron) of Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC, in column 4 (purity), the words ‘930 g/kg’ are replaced by the words ‘910 g/kg’.
V vrstici 176 (nikosulfuron) Priloge I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS, v stolpcu 4 (čistost), se besedilo „930 g/kg“ nadomesti z besedilom „910 g/kg“.
They shall apply those provisions from 1 July 2009.
Navedeni predpisi se uporabljajo od 1. julija 2009.
EFSA Scientific Report (2007) 120, 1-91, Conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance nicosulfuron (finalised 29 November 2007).
Znanstveno poročilo EFSA (2007) 120, 1–91, Sklep o strokovnem pregledu ocene tveganja pesticidov z aktivno snovjo nikosulfuron (dokončano: 29. novembra 2007).
Directive 2009/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2009/52/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
providing for minimum standards on sanctions and measures against employers of illegally staying third-country nationals
o minimalnih standardih glede sankcij in ukrepov zoper delodajalce nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav
The European Council meeting of 14 and 15 December 2006 agreed that cooperation among Member States should be strengthened in the fight against illegal immigration and in particular that measures against illegal employment should be intensified at Member State and EU level.
Evropski svet se je na zasedanju 14. in 15. decembra 2006 strinjal, da bi bilo treba okrepiti sodelovanje med državami članicami na področju boja proti nezakonitemu priseljevanju in zlasti, da bi bilo treba ukrepe proti nezakonitemu priseljevanju okrepiti na ravni držav članic in EU.
A key pull factor for illegal immigration into the EU is the possibility of obtaining work in the EU without the required legal status.
Glavni privabitveni dejavnik za nezakonito priseljevanje v EU je možnost zaposlitve v EU brez zahtevanega zakonitega statusa.
Action against illegal immigration and illegal stay should therefore include measures to counter that pull factor.
Ukrepi proti nezakonitemu priseljevanju in nezakonitemu prebivanju bi morali zato vključevati ukrepe proti temu privabitvenemu dejavniku.
The centrepiece of such measures should be a general prohibition on the employment of third-country nationals who do not have the right to be resident in the EU, accompanied by sanctions against employers who infringe that prohibition.
Osrednji del teh ukrepov bi morala biti splošna prepoved zaposlovanja državljanov tretjih držav, ki nimajo pravice prebivanja v EU, s sankcijami zoper delodajalce, ki kršijo to prepoved.
As this Directive provides for minimum standards, Member States should remain free to adopt or maintain stricter sanctions and measures and impose stricter obligations on employers.
Ker ta direktiva določa minimalne standarde, lahko države članice sprejmejo ali obdržijo strožje sankcije in ukrepe ter določijo strožje obveznosti delodajalcev.
This Directive should not apply to third-country nationals staying legally in a Member State regardless of whether they are allowed to work in its territory.
Ta direktiva se ne bi smela uporabljati za državljane tretjih držav, ki zakonito prebivajo v državi članici, ne glede na to, ali jim je dovoljeno delati na njenem ozemlju.
Furthermore, it should not apply to persons enjoying the Community right of free movement, as defined in Article 2(5) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) [4].
Nadalje se ne bi se smela uporabljati za osebe, ki uživajo pravico Skupnosti do prostega gibanja, kakor je opredeljena v členu 2(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 562/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. marca 2006 o Zakoniku Skupnosti o pravilih, ki urejajo gibanje oseb prek meja (Zakonik o schengenskih mejah) [4].
Moreover it should not apply to third-country nationals who are in a situation covered by Community law, such as those who are lawfully employed in a Member State and who are posted by a service provider to another Member State in the context of the provision of services.
Poleg tega se ne bi smela uporabljati za državljane tretjih držav, katerih položaj zajema pravo Skupnosti, na primer tisti, ki so zakonito zaposleni v eni državi članici in jih ponudnik storitev v okviru opravljanja storitev napoti v drugo državo članico.
This Directive should apply without prejudice to national law prohibiting the employment of legally staying third-country nationals who work in breach of their residence status.
Ta direktiva bi se morala uporabljati brez poseganja v nacionalno zakonodajo, ki prepoveduje zaposlovanje zakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav, ki z delom kršijo svoj status prebivanja.
For the specific purposes of this Directive, certain terms should be defined and such definitions should be used only for the purposes of this Directive.
Za posebne namene te direktive bi bilo treba opredeliti določene pojme in te opredelitve pojmov bi bilo treba uporabljati le za namene te direktive.
The definition of employment should encompass its constituent elements, namely activities that are or ought to be remunerated, undertaken for or under the direction and/or supervision of an employer, irrespective of the legal relationship.
Opredelitev zaposlitve bi morala zajemati njene sestavne dele, in sicer dejavnosti, ki so ali bi morale biti plačane in se opravljajo za delodajalca ali po njegovih navodilih in/ali pod njegovim nadzorstvom, ne glede na pravni odnos.
The definition of employer may include an association of persons recognised as having the capacity to perform legal acts without having legal personality.
Opredelitev delodajalca lahko vključuje združenje oseb, ki jim je priznana sposobnost opravljanja pravnih dejanj brez pravne osebnosti.
To prevent the employment of illegally staying third-country nationals, employers should be required, before recruiting a third-country national, including in cases where the third-country national is being recruited for the purpose of posting to another Member State in the context of the provision of services, to check that the third-country national has a valid residence permit or another authorisation for stay showing that he or she is legally staying on the territory of the Member State of recruitment.
Da se prepreči zaposlovanje nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav, bi morali delodajalci pred zaposlitvijo državljana tretje države, tudi če državljana tretje države zaposlijo z namenom, da ga v okviru zagotavljanja storitev napotijo v drugo državo članico, preveriti, ali ima veljavno dovoljenje za prebivanje ali katero drugo odobritev bivanja, ki kaže, da zakonito prebiva na ozemlju države članice zaposlitve.
To enable Member States in particular to check for forged documents, employers should also be required to notify the competent authorities of the employment of a third-country national.
Da se državam članicam omogoči, da preverijo zlasti, ali so dokumenti pristni, bi bilo treba tudi od delodajalcev zahtevati, da pristojne organe obvestijo o zaposlitvi državljana tretje države.
In order to minimise the administrative burden, Member States should be free to provide for such notifications to be undertaken within the framework of other notification schemes.
Za zmanjšanje upravnega bremena lahko države članice določijo, da se takšno obveščanje opravi v okviru drugih postopkov obveščanja.
Member States should be free to decide a simplified procedure for notification by employers who are natural persons where the employment is for their private purposes.
Države članice lahko določijo uporabo poenostavljenega postopka za obveščanje za delodajalce, ki so fizične osebe, če zaposlitev služi njihovim zasebnim namenom.
Employers that have fulfilled the obligations set out in this Directive should not be held liable for having employed illegally staying third-country nationals, in particular if the competent authority later finds that the document presented by an employee had in fact been forged or misused, unless the employer knew that the document was a forgery.
Delodajalci, ki izpolnjujejo obveznosti, ki jih določa ta direktiva, ne bi smeli biti odgovorni za zaposlitev nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav, zlasti če pristojni organ pozneje ugotovi, da je dokument, ki ga je zaposleni pokazal, ponarejen ali da je bil zlorabljen, razen če je delodajalec vedel, da je dokument ponarejen.
To facilitate the fulfilment by employers of their obligations, Member States should use their best endeavours to handle requests for renewal of residence permits in a timely manner.
Da bi delodajalcem olajšali izpolnjevanje njihovih obveznosti, bi morale države članice storiti vse, da bi pravočasno obravnavale prošnje za obnovo dovoljenj za bivanje.
To enforce the general prohibition and to deter infringements, Member States should provide for appropriate sanctions.
Za izvrševanje splošne prepovedi in odvračanje od kršitev bi morale države članice zagotoviti ustrezne sankcije.
These should include financial sanctions and contributions to the costs of returning illegally staying third-country nationals, together with the possibility of reduced financial sanctions on employers who are natural persons where the employment is for their private purposes.
Te bi morale vključevati denarne sankcije in prispevke za stroške vrnitve nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav, skupaj z možnostjo znižanja denarnih sankcij za delodajalce, ki so fizične osebe, kadar zaposlitev služi njihovim zasebnim namenom.
The employer should in any event be required to pay to the third-country nationals any outstanding remuneration for the work which they have undertaken and any outstanding taxes and social security contributions.
Delodajalec bi moral v vsakem primeru državljanom tretjih držav plačati vsa morebitna še neporavnana plačila za delo, ki so ga opravili, ter vse neplačane davke in prispevke za socialno varnost.
If the level of remuneration cannot be determined, it should be presumed to be at least as high as the wage provided for by the applicable laws on minimum wages, by collective agreements or in accordance with established practice in the relevant occupational branches.
Če višine plačila ni mogoče določiti, bi bilo treba domnevati, da je najmanj v višini plače, določene z veljavnimi zakoni o minimalni plači, kolektivnimi pogodbami ali v skladu z ustaljeno prakso v ustreznih poklicnih panogah.
The employer should also be required to pay, where appropriate, any costs arising from the sending of outstanding remuneration to the country to which the illegally employed third-country national has, or has been, returned.
Delodajalec bi moral po potrebi plačati tudi vse stroške pošiljanja neporavnanih plačil v državo, kamor se je nezakonito zaposleni državljan tretje države vrnil ali je bil vrnjen.
In those cases where back payments are not made by the employer, Member States should not be obliged to fulfil that obligation in place of the employer.
V primerih, ko delodajalec preostalih plačil ne poravna, države članice ne bi smele biti obvezane k izpolnitvi te obveznosti namesto delodajalca.
An illegally employed third-country national should not derive a right to entry, stay and access to the labour market from the illegal employment relationship or from the payment or back payment of remuneration, social security contributions or taxes by the employer or by a legal entity which has to pay instead of the employer.
Nezakonito zaposlen državljan tretje države ne bi smel pridobiti pravice do vstopa, prebivanja in dostopa do trga dela na podlagi nezakonitega delovnega razmerja ali izplačila ali neporavnanega plačila osebnih prejemkov, prispevkov za socialno varnost ali davkov s strani delodajalca ali pravnega subjekta, ki jih mora poravnati namesto njega.
Member States should ensure that claims are or may be lodged and that mechanisms are in place to ensure that recovered amounts of outstanding remuneration are able to be received by the third-country nationals to whom they are due.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti vložitev ali možnost vložitve terjatev in vzpostavitev mehanizmov za zagotovitev, da državljani tretjih držav lahko prejmejo izterjane zneske svojih dolgovanih plačil.
Member States should not be obliged to involve their missions or representations in third countries in those mechanisms.
Države članice ne bi smele biti obvezane k vključevanju svojih misij ali predstavništev v tretjih državah v te mehanizme.
Member States should, in the context of establishing effective mechanisms to facilitate complaints and if not already provided for by national legislation, consider the possibility and added value of enabling a competent authority to bring proceedings against an employer for the purpose of recovering outstanding remuneration.
Države članice bi morale v okviru vzpostavljanja učinkovitih mehanizmov za poenostavitev pritožb, če to ni že določeno v nacionalni zakonodaji, preučiti možnost in dodano vrednost pooblastitve pristojnega organa, da sproži postopek proti delodajalcu z namenom izterjave neporavnanih plačil.
Member States should further provide for a presumption of an employment relationship of at least three months’ duration so that the burden of proof is on the employer in respect of at least a certain period.
Države članice bi morale omogočiti domnevo, da delovno razmerje traja vsaj tri mesece, tako da dokazno breme vsaj za določeno obdobje nosi delodajalec.
Among others, the employee should also have the opportunity of proving the existence and duration of an employment relationship.
Med drugim bi moral imeti zaposleni tudi priložnost, da dokaže obstoj in trajanje delovnega razmerja.
Member States should provide for the possibility of further sanctions against employers, inter alia, exclusions from entitlement to some or all public benefits, aids or subsidies, including agricultural subsidies, exclusions from public procurement procedures and recovery of some or all public benefits, aids or subsidies, including EU funding managed by Member States, that have already been granted.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti možnost nadaljnjih sankcij proti delodajalcem, med drugim z izključitvijo iz upravičenosti do nekaterih ali vseh javnih ugodnosti, pomoči in subvencij, med katere spadajo tudi kmetijske subvencije, izključitvijo iz postopkov javnih naročil ter vračilom že dodeljenih nekaterih ali vseh javnih ugodnosti, pomoči in subvencij, vključno s sredstvi EU, ki jih upravljajo države članice in ki so že bila dodeljena.
Member States should be free to decide not to apply those further sanctions against employers who are natural persons where the employment is for their private purposes.
Odločitev, da se za delodajalce, ki so fizične osebe, te nadaljnje sankcije ne uporabijo, če zaposlitev služi njihovim zasebnim namenom, bi morala biti prepuščena državam članicam.
This Directive, and in particular its Articles 7, 10 and 12, should be without prejudice to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5].
Ta direktiva in zlasti členi 7, 10 in 12 ne bi smeli posegati v Uredbo Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [5].
In view of the prevalence of subcontracting in certain affected sectors, it is necessary to ensure that at least the contractor of which the employer is a direct subcontractor may be liable to pay financial sanctions in addition to or in place of the employer.
Glede na razširjenost sklepanja pogodb s podizvajalci v določenih prizadetih sektorjih je treba zagotoviti, da je lahko vsaj izvajalec, katerega neposredni podizvajalec je delodajalec, odgovoren za plačilo finančnih sankcij poleg ali namesto delodajalca.
In specific cases, other contractors may be liable to pay financial sanctions in addition to or in place of an employer of illegally staying third-country nationals.
V določenih primerih so lahko za plačilo finančnih sankcij poleg ali namesto delodajalca nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav odgovorni drugi izvajalci.
Back payments which are to be covered by the liability provisions of this Directive should also include contributions to national holiday pay funds and social funds regulated by law or collective agreements.
Neporavnana plačila, ki so zajeta z določbami te direktive o odgovornosti, bi morale vključevati tudi prispevke v nacionalne blagajne za plačani dopust in socialne sklade, ki jih ureja zakon ali kolektivne pogodbe.
Experience has shown that the existing systems of sanctions have not been sufficient to achieve complete compliance with prohibitions against the employment of illegally staying third-country nationals.
Izkušnje so pokazale, da obstoječi sistemi sankcij ne zadostujejo za popolno upoštevanje prepovedi zaposlovanja nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav.
One of the reasons is that administrative sanctions alone are likely not to be enough to deter certain unscrupulous employers.
Eden od razlogov je, da samo upravne sankcije ne zadostujejo za odvrnitev določenih brezobzirnih delodajalcev.
Compliance can and should be strengthened by the application of criminal penalties.
Skladnost bi se lahko okrepila in bi jo bilo treba okrepiti z uporabo kazni.
To guarantee the full effectiveness of the general prohibition, there is therefore a particular need for more dissuasive sanctions in serious cases, such as persistently repeated infringements, the illegal employment of a significant number of third-country nationals, particularly exploitative working conditions, the employer knowing that the worker is a victim of trafficking in human beings and the illegal employment of a minor.
Za zagotovitev popolne učinkovitosti splošne prepovedi zato obstaja posebna potreba po bolj odvračilnih sankcijah za hujše primere, kot so ponavljajoče se kršitve, nezakonita zaposlitev znatnega števila državljanov tretjih držav, posebej izkoriščevalski delovni pogoji, primer, kadar delodajalec ve, da je delavec žrtev trgovine z ljudmi, ter nezakonita zaposlitev mladoletne osebe.
This Directive obliges Member States to provide for criminal penalties in their national legislation in respect of those serious infringements.
Ta direktiva zavezuje države članice, da v svojo nacionalno zakonodajo vključijo kazni za te hude kršitve.
It creates no obligations regarding the application of such penalties, or any other available system of law enforcement, in individual cases.
Direktiva ne ustvarja nobenih obveznosti glede uporabe takšnih kazni ali drugega razpoložljivega sistema pregona v posameznih primerih.
In all cases deemed to be serious according to this Directive the infringement should be considered a criminal offence throughout the Community when committed intentionally.
V vseh primerih, ki na podlagi te direktive štejejo za hude, bi morala kršitev pomeniti kaznivo dejanje v celotni Skupnosti, če je do nje prišlo namenoma.
The provisions of this Directive regarding criminal offences should be without prejudice to the application of Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA of 19 July 2002 on combating trafficking in human beings [6].
Določbe te direktive v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji ne bi smele posegati v uporabo Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/629/PNZ z dne 19. julija 2002 o boju proti trgovini z ljudmi [6].
The criminal offence should be punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties.
Kaznivo dejanje bi bilo treba kaznovati z učinkovitimi, sorazmernimi in odvračilnimi kaznimi.
The obligation to ensure effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties under this Directive is without prejudice to the internal organisation of criminal law and criminal justice in the Member States.
Obveznost zagotoviti učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračalne kazni po tej direktivi ne posega v notranjo organizacijo kazenskega prava in kazenskega pravosodja v državah članicah.