natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is recalled that TMK did not cooperate fully in the original investigation and therefore its dumping margin was calculated on the basis of facts available, i.e. the normal value of another producer group in Russia which cooperated with the investigation and Eurostat data.
Treba je opozoriti, da družba TMK ni polno sodelovala v prvotni preiskavi in da je zaradi tega stopnja dampinga bila izračunana na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev, tj. normalne vrednosti druge skupine proizvajalke v Rusiji, ki je sodelovala pri preiskavi, in podatkih Eurostata.
According to TMK, it failed to cooperate during the original investigation mainly because of the significant internal changes which had already begun to take place within the group during the original investigation period.
Družba TMK je navedla, da so razlog za njeno nesodelovanje v prvotni preiskavi pomembne notranje spremembe, ki so se začele odvijati v družbi v obdobju prvotne preiskave.
Due to these exceptional circumstances, which had an impact on the corporate governance of the group, as well as its accounting and auditing practices, TMK could not provide adequate evidence of its prices and costs during the original investigation.
Zaradi teh izjemnih okoliščin, ki so imele vpliv na upravljanje skupine ter na njeno računovodsko in revizorsko prakso, TMK med prvotno preiskavo ni mogel predložiti ustreznih dokazil o svojih cenah in stroških.
According to the company, the changes in its organisation since the original investigation have resulted in a simpler corporate structure, improved corporate governance and a switch to IFRS accounting, which would allow it to cooperate.
Družba je navedla, da so spremembe v njeni organizaciji, ki so se odvile od začetka prvotne preiskave, poenostavile njeno strukturo, izboljšale upravljanje ter omogočile prehod na računovodske standarde MSRP. To naj bi družbi omogočilo, da sodeluje pri preiskavah.
It also provided prima facie evidence to show that a comparison of normal value based on its own domestic prices or costs and export prices to the Community would lead to a reduction of dumping well below the level of the current measure.
Družba je prav tako predložila prima facie dokaze, da bi pokazala, da bi primerjava normalne vrednosti, ki bi temeljila na njenih domačih cenah ali stroških, in izvoznih cen v Skupnost, pomenila zmanjšanje dampinga znatno pod stopnjo sedanjega ukrepa.
Therefore it claimed that the continued imposition of the measure at the existing level, which was based on the level of dumping previously established, was no longer necessary to offset dumping.
Zato je družba trdila, da nadaljevanje ukrepov na obstoječi ravni, ki temelji na prej vzpostavljeni stopnji dampinga, za izravnavo dampinga ni več potrebno.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of a partial interim review, the Commission decided on its own initiative to initiate a partial interim review in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, limited in scope to the level of dumping as far as the exporting producers/members of the TMK group are concerned.
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom je Komisija ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi, ki upravičujejo začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda, in na lastno pobudo začela delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe, omejen na stopnjo dampinga glede proizvajalcev izvoznikov/članov skupine TMK.
The Commission published a notice of initiation on 22 June 2007 in the Official Journal of the European Union [3] and commenced an investigation.
Komisija je 22. junija 2007 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3] objavila obvestilo o začetku in začela preiskavo.
The Commission officially advised TMK and its related companies, as well as the representatives of the exporting country, of the initiation of the interim review.
Komisija je o začetku vmesnega pregleda uradno obvestila TMK in njegove povezane družbe ter predstavnike države izvoznice.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing.
Zainteresiranim strankam je bila dana možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in Komisijo zaprosijo za zaslišanje.
The Commission also sent questionnaires to TMK and its related companies and received replies within the deadlines set for that purpose.
Komisija je TMK in njegovim povezanim družbam poslala tudi vprašalnike in odgovore prejela v rokih, določenih v ta namen.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for the determination of dumping and carried out verification visits at the premises of the following companies:
Komisija je iskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za določitev dampinga, ter opravila preveritvene obiske v prostorih naslednjih družb:
OAO Volzhsky Pipe Plant, Russia,
OAO Volzhsky Pipe Plant, Rusija
OAO Taganrog Metallurgical Works, Russia,
OAO Taganrog Metallurgical Works, Rusija
OAO Sinarsky Pipe Plant, Russia,
OAO Sinarsky Pipe Plant, Rusija
OAO Seversky Tube Works, Russia,
OAO Seversky Tube Works, Rusija
ZAO TMK Trade House, Russia,
ZAO TMK Trade House, Rusija
TMK Europe GmbH, Germany,
TMK Europe GmbH, Nemčija
TMK Global AG, Switzerland,
TMK Global AG, Švica
TMK Italia s.r.l., Italy.
TMK Italia s.r.l., Italija
The investigation of dumping covered the period from 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2007 (the review investigation period or RIP).
Preiskava dampinga je zajela obdobje od 1. aprila 2006 do 31. marca 2007 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
REVIEW INVESTIGATION
PREISKAVA V ZVEZI S PREGLEDOM
The product concerned by the current review is the same as that in the original investigation, i.e. certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel, of circular cross-section, of an external diameter not exceeding 406,4 mm with a Carbon Equivalent Value (CEV) not exceeding 0,86 according to the International Institute of Welding (IIW) formula and chemical analysis [4] originating in Russia (the product concerned), currently classifiable within CN codes ex73041100, ex73041910, ex73041930, ex73042200, ex73042300, ex73042400, ex73042910, ex73042930, ex73043180, ex73043958, ex73043992, ex73043993, ex73045189, ex73045992 and ex73045993 [5].
Izdelek, ki se pregleduje, je isti kot v prvotni preiskavi, tj. nekatere brezšivne cevi iz železa ali jekla s krožnim prečnim prerezom, z zunanjim premerom do vključno 406,4 mm, z ekvivalentom ogljika (CEV) do vključno 0,86 v skladu s formulo in kemično analizo Mednarodnega inštituta za varilstvo [4], s poreklom iz Rusije, trenutno uvrščene pod oznake KN ex73041100, ex73041910, ex73041930, ex73042200, ex73042300, ex73042400, ex73042910, ex73042930, ex73043180, ex73043958, ex73043992, ex73043993, ex73045189, ex73045992 in ex73045993 [5].
The product produced and sold on the Russian domestic market and that exported to the Community have the same basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics and uses and are therefore considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Izdelek, proizveden in prodan na ruskem domačem trgu, kakor tudi tisti, izvožen v Skupnost, imata enake osnovne fizikalne, tehnične in kemijske lastnosti ter uporabo in se zato štejeta za podobna v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
Sales on the domestic market are made via the related company, ZAO TMK Trade House, which then resells the product concerned to independent customers in Russia.
Prodaja na domačem trgu poteka prek povezane družbe, ZAO TMK Trade House, ki nato proda zadevni izdelek neodvisnim strankam v Rusiji.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, it was first examined, with regard to the four cooperating exporting producers of the group, whether their domestic sales of the like product to independent customers were representative, i.e. whether the total volume of such sales was equal to or greater than 5 % of the total volume of the corresponding export sales to the Community.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe je bilo v zvezi s štirimi sodelujočimi izvozniki proizvajalci skupine najprej preučeno, ali je bila domača prodaja podobnega izdelka neodvisnim strankam reprezentativna, tj. ali je bil celoten obseg take prodaje enak ali večji od 5 % celotnega obsega ustreznega izvoza v Skupnost.
The total volume of domestic sales of the like product was found to be representative.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je celoten obseg domače prodaje podobnega izdelka reprezentativen.
The Commission’s services subsequently identified those types of the like product sold on the domestic market that were identical to or directly comparable with the types exported to the Community.
Službe Komisije so nato opredelile tiste vrste podobnega izdelka, prodane na notranjem trgu, ki so bile identične ali neposredno primerljive z vrstami, izvoženimi v Skupnost.
For each type sold by the exporting producers on their domestic market and found to be directly comparable with the type of the product concerned exported to the Community, it was established whether domestic sales were sufficiently representative for the purposes of Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Za vsako vrsto, ki so jo proizvajalci izvozniki prodali na svojem notranjem trgu in za katero je bilo ugotovljeno, da je neposredno primerljiva z vrsto zadevnega izdelka, izvoženega v Skupnost, je bilo ugotovljeno, ali je domača prodaja zadosti reprezentativna za namene člena 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
Domestic sales of a particular type were considered sufficiently representative when the total domestic sales volume of that type during the IP represented 5 % or more of the total sales volume of the comparable type of the product concerned exported to the Community.
Domača prodaja določene vrste se je štela za dovolj reprezentativno, če je celotni obseg domače prodaje te vrste v OP predstavljal 5 % ali več celotnega obsega prodaje primerljive vrste zadevnega izdelka, izvožene v Skupnost.
Subsequently, it was examined whether each type of the product concerned sold domestically in representative quantities could be considered as being sold in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation, by establishing the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market of the product type in question.
Nato je bilo preučeno, ali se lahko posamezna vrsta zadevnega izdelka, prodana na notranjem trgu v reprezentativnih količinah, šteje kot prodana med običajnim potekom trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe, in sicer tako, da je bil izračunan delež dobičkonosne prodaje zadevne vrste izdelka neodvisnim strankam na notranjem trgu.
In cases where the sales volume of the relevant product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of that type and where the weighted average price of that type was equal to or above the cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price, calculated as a weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales made during the IP, irrespective of whether these sales were profitable or not.
V primerih, ko je obseg prodaje ustrezne vrste izdelka, prodane po neto prodajni ceni, enaki izračunanim stroškom proizvodnje ali višji od njih, predstavljal več kot 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste in je bila tehtana povprečna cena te vrste enaka stroškom proizvodnje ali višja od njih, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje v OP, ne glede na to, ali je bila ta prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne.
In cases where the volume of profitable sales of a product type represented 80 % or less of the total sales volume of that type or where the weighted average price of that type was below the cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price, calculated as a weighted average of profitable sales of that type only, provided that these sales represented 10 % or more of the total sales volume of that type.
V primerih, ko je obseg dobičkonosne prodaje vrste izdelka predstavljal 80 % ali manj celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste ali ko je bila tehtana povprečna cena te vrste nižja kot stroški proizvodnje, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtano povprečje dobičkonosne prodaje samo navedene vrste, pod pogojem, da je ta prodaja predstavljala 10 % ali več celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste.
Wherever domestic prices of a particular product type sold by an exporting producer could not be used in order to establish the normal value, another method had to be applied.
Kadar domačih cen določene vrste izdelka, ki jo je prodal proizvajalec izvoznik, ni bilo mogoče uporabiti za določitev normalne vrednosti, je bilo treba uporabiti drugo metodo.
In accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, normal value was constructed by adding to the exporting producer’s manufacturing costs of the exported types, adjusted where necessary, a reasonable percentage for selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) and a reasonable margin of profit.
V skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana tako, da sta bila proizvodnim stroškom izvoženih vrst izdelka, ki so bili po potrebi prilagojeni, prišteta ustrezen znesek za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške (PSA-stroški) ter ustrezna stopnja dobička.
With regard to manufacturing costs, and in particular energy costs, as far as gas is concerned, it was examined whether the gas prices paid by the exporting producers reasonably reflected the costs associated with the production and distribution of gas.
V zvezi s proizvodnimi stroški in zlasti stroški za energijo, se je glede plina v preiskavi ugotavljalo, ali so cene plina, ki so jih plačevali proizvajalci izvozniki, realno odražale stroške, povezane s proizvodnjo in distribucijo plina.
It was found that the domestic gas price paid by the exporting producers was around one fourth of the export price of natural gas from Russia.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je domača cena plina, ki so jo plačevali proizvajalci izvozniki, znašala približno četrtino izvozne cene zemeljskega plina iz Rusije.
In this regard, all available data indicates that domestic gas prices in Russia are regulated prices, which are far below market prices paid in unregulated markets for natural gas.
V zvezi s tem vsi razpoložljivi podatki kažejo, da so domače cene plina v Rusiji nadzorovane in precej nižje od tržnih cen, ki veljajo na prostih trgih zemeljskega plina.
Therefore, since gas costs were not reasonably reflected in the exporting producers’ records as provided for in Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation, they had to be adjusted accordingly.
Ker evidenca proizvajalcev izvoznikov ni realno odražala stroškov za plin, je te bilo treba ustrezno prilagoditi v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe.
In the absence of any sufficiently representative, undistorted gas prices relating to the Russian domestic market, it was considered appropriate to base the adjustment, in accordance with Article 2(5), on the basis of information from other representative markets.
Ker ni bilo na razpolago nobenih dovolj reprezentativnih neizkrivljenih cen plina z ruskega notranjega trga, se je zdelo primerno, da prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(5) temelji na informacijah z drugih reprezentativnih trgov.
The adjusted price was based on the average price of Russian gas when sold for export at the German/Czech border (Waidhaus), adjusted for local distribution costs.
Prilagojena cena je temeljila na povprečni ceni ruskega plina pri prodaji za izvoz na nemško-češki meji (Waidhaus), prilagojeni glede na lokalne distribucijske stroške.
For those product types where the normal value was constructed, as described above, the construction was done on the basis of the manufacturing costs of the exported types after the adjustment for the gas cost.
Za tiste vrste izdelka, za katere je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana, kot je opisano zgoraj, je konstruirana vrednost bila izračunana na podlagi proizvodnih stroškov izvoženih vrst po prilagoditvi glede na stroške plina.
All export sales of TMK are made via related companies located either in the Community or in Switzerland.
Ves izvoz TMK poteka prek povezanih družb s sedežem v Skupnosti ali Švici.
Thus the export price was established on the basis of Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, i.e. using the resale prices actually paid or payable to the related company by the first independent buyer in the Community in the RIP, adjusted for all costs incurred between importation and resale and for profits.
Izvozna cena je bila zato določena na podlagi člena 2(9) osnovne uredbe, tj. z uporabo cen pri nadaljnji prodaji, ki so bile dejansko plačane ali plačljive povezani družbi pri prodaji prvemu neodvisnemu kupcu v Skupnosti v OPP, prilagojenih glede na vse stroške, nastale med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, ter glede na dobiček.
As for the export prices charged to customers in the Community by the related company in Switzerland, TMK Global AG, TMK claimed that it would be unwarranted to deduct from the export price the profit, SG&A and commissions or agency fees since TMK Global acts as a fully integrated export sales department outside the Community.
Glede cen, ki so jih plačevale stranke v Skupnosti povezani družbi v Švici, TMK Global AG, je TMK trdil, da bi bilo neupravičeno od izvozne cene odšteti dobiček, PSA-stroške in provizije ali stroške posredovanja agencij, ker TMK Global deluje kot v celoti integriran izvozni oddelek izven Skupnosti.
According to TMK such deductions would only be warranted for companies located in the Community and forming a part of the group’s importing network, as provided for in Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Po mnenju TMK bi takšni odbitki bili upravičeni le za družbe s sedežem v Skupnosti, ki so del izvozne mreže skupine, kot je določeno v členu 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
The above claim was accepted, as it was found that TMK Global’s role after the organisational changes within the group had evolved into that of an export department responsible for exports outside the Community and also the export sales to the Community, albeit that these had dropped to low volumes prior and during the RIP.
Ta trditev je bila sprejeta, saj je bilo ugotovljeno, da ima TMK Global po organizacijskih spremembah v skupini vlogo izvoznega oddelka, pristojnega za izvoz izven Skupnosti in tudi za izvoz v Skupnost, četudi sta se obe vrsti izvoza pred in v OPP bistveno zmanjšali.
Indeed, TMK Global acts as a ‘sales hub’, which simplifies the purchasing and documentation processes for the front offices located directly in the key markets, i.e. TMK North America and TMK Middle East.
TMK Global dejansko deluje kot vozlišče za prodajo in tako poenostavlja postopke dobave in dokumentiranja za trgovalne enote s sedežem neposredno na ključnih trgih, tj. TMK North America in TMK Middle-East.
It also performs other functions of an export department with regard to export sales to its key markets, as well as to the Community, such as management accounting and enforcement of goods tracking standards.
Poleg tega opravlja še druge funkcije izvoznega oddelka v zvezi z izvozom na svoje ključne trge in v Skupnost, kot sta upravljalno računovodstvo in izvajanje standardov za spremljanje blaga.
In the past, these functions were performed by the local export departments of each mill, but they are now carried out by TMK Global for the sake of centralisation and to ensure consistency.
V preteklosti so te naloge opravljali lokalni izvozni oddelki za vsako tovarno posebej, zdaj pa je zaradi centralizacije in doslednosti zanje pristojen TMK Global.
The comparison between the weighted normal value and the weighted export price was made on an ex-works basis and at the same level of trade.
Primerjava tehtane normalne vrednosti s tehtano izvozno ceno je bila izvedena na podlagi cene franko tovarna in na enaki ravni trgovine.
In order to ensure a fair comparison, account was taken, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, of differences in factors which were demonstrated to affect prices and price comparability.
Da bi se zagotovila poštena primerjava, so se v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe upoštevale razlike v dejavnikih, za katere se je pokazalo, da so vplivali na cene in primerljivost cen.
On this basis, allowances for differences in physical characteristics, transport costs, insurance, handling charges, credit costs and import duties were made where applicable and justified.
Na podlagi tega so bila po potrebi odobrena in utemeljena nadomestila za razlike v fizikalnih značilnostih, stroških prevoza, zavarovanju, manipulativnih stroških, stroških kredita in uvoznih dajatvah.
TMK’s dumping margin expressed as a percentage of the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, duty unpaid, was found to be 27,2 %.
Stopnja dampinga za TMK, izražena kot odstotek neto cene franko meja Skupnosti, dajatev neplačana, je bila 27,2 %.
In this respect it is recalled that TMK did not cooperate properly during the original investigation.
Pri tem je treba opozoriti, da TMK ni ustrezno sodeloval v prvotni preiskavi.
Therefore its dumping margin, which forms the basis of the currently applicable duty of 35,8 %, was determined on the basis of facts available, in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bila stopnja dampinga, ki je podlaga sedanji dajatvi 35,8 %, določena na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
As for the facts available, the Commission used the normal value established for another, cooperating, Russian producer group and Eurostat data.
V zvezi z razpoložljivimi dejstvi je Komisija uporabila normalno vrednost, določeno za drugo rusko skupino proizvajalko, ki je v preiskavi sodelovala, in podatke Eurostata.
The insufficient cooperation which led to the use of facts available was caused mainly by significant internal changes which had already begun to take place within the group during the original investigation period.
Vzrok za nezadostno sodelovanje, ki je privedlo do uporabe razpoložljivih dejstev, so bile v glavnem pomembne notranje spremembe, ki so se začele odvijati v skupini že v obdobju prvotne preiskave.
Due to these exceptional circumstances, which had an impact on the corporate governance of the group as well as on its accounting and auditing practices, TMK could not provide adequate evidence of its prices and costs during the original investigation.
Zaradi teh izjemnih okoliščin, ki so imele vpliv na upravljanje skupine ter na njeno računovodsko in revizorsko prakso, TMK v prvotni preiskavi ni mogel predložiti ustreznih dokazov za svoje cene in stroške.
In the current investigation TMK cooperated fully.
V sedanji preiskavi je TMK polno sodeloval.
Indeed, in contrast to the original investigation, when the group was still in a state of flux, the data provided in the questionnaire responses in the current investigation could be verified in a satisfactory manner.
Za razliko od podatkov iz prvotne preiskave, med katero so v skupini še potekale spremembe, je bilo podatke iz odgovorov na vprašalnik sedanje preiskave možno zadovoljivo preveriti.
Hence, since the group provided reliable data with regard to the normal value and the export price, the dumping margin could be calculated based on its own data.
Ker je torej skupina predložila zanesljive podatke v zvezi z normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno, se stopnja dampinga lahko izračuna na podlagi njenih lastnih podatkov.
Evidence obtained during the investigation has shown that the changes in TMK’s corporate structure and accounting practices, which allowed the group to cooperate in the current investigation, are to be considered lasting as they refer to the long-term structure of the group.
Iz dokazov, pridobljenih med preiskavo, je razvidno, da je spremembe v strukturi in računovodski praksi TMK, ki so skupini omogočile sodelovanje v sedanji preiskavi, treba obravnavati kot trajne, saj se nanašajo na dolgoročno strukturo skupine.