natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In particular, enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation complies with Union law on judicial cooperation in civil matters, in that enhanced cooperation does not affect any pre-existing acquis.
Okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju prava, ki se uporablja za razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti, je s pravom Unije na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih zadevah skladno zlasti v tem, da okrepljeno sodelovanje ne vpliva na že obstoječ pravni red.
This Decision respects the rights, principles and freedoms recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular Article 21 thereof.
Ta sklep spoštuje pravice, načela in svoboščine, priznane z Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, in zlasti člen 21 Listine.
Enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation is open at any time to all Member States, in accordance with Article 328 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
V okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju prava, ki se uporablja za razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti, se lahko v skladu s členom 328 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije kadar koli vključi vsaka država članica –
The Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Latvia, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, Malta, the Republic of Austria, the Portuguese Republic, Romania and the Republic of Slovenia are hereby authorised to establish enhanced cooperation between themselves in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation by applying the relevant provisions of the Treaties.
Kraljevini Belgiji, Republiki Bolgariji, Zvezni republiki Nemčiji, Kraljevini Španiji, Francoski republiki, Italijanski republiki, Republiki Latviji, Velikemu vojvodstvu Luksemburg, Republiki Madžarski, Malti, Republiki Avstriji, Portugalski republiki, Romuniji in Republiki Sloveniji se dovoli vzpostaviti okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju prava, ki se uporablja za razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti, ob uporabi ustreznih določb Pogodb.
Done at Brussels, 12 July 2010.
V Bruslju, 12. julija 2010
France joined the request by a letter dated 12 January 2009, Germany by a letter dated 15 April 2010, Belgium by a letter dated 22 April 2010, Latvia by a letter dated 17 May 2010, Malta by a letter dated 31 May 2010 and Portugal during the Council meeting of 4 June 2010.
Francija se je prošnji pridružila z dopisom dne 12. januarja 2009, Nemčija z dopisom dne 15. aprila 2010, Belgija z dopisom dne 22. aprila 2010, Latvija z dopisom dne 17. maja 2010, Malta z dopisom dne 31. maja 2010 in Portugalska med zasedanjem Sveta dne 4. junija 2010.
On 3 March 2010, Greece withdrew its request.
Grčija je 3. marca 2010 svojo prošnjo umaknila.
concerning the allocation of the funds decommitted from projects under the ninth and previous European Development Funds (EDF) for the purpose of addressing the needs of the most vulnerable population in Sudan
o dodelitvi sredstev, prerazporejenih iz projektov devetega evropskega razvojnega sklada (ERS) in prejšnjih ERS, za zadovoljevanje potreb najbolj ranljivega prebivalstva v Sudanu
Having regard to the Internal Agreement between the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on the financing of Community aid under the multi-annual financial framework for the period 2008 to 2013 in accordance with the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement and on the allocation of financial assistance for the Overseas Countries and Territories to which Part Four of the EC Treaty applies [1], and in particular Article 1(4) and Article 6 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Notranjega sporazuma med predstavniki vlad držav članic, ki so se sestali v okviru Sveta, o financiranju pomoči Skupnosti v okviru večletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje 2008–2013 v skladu s Sporazumom o partnerstvu AKP-ES ter o dodelitvi finančne pomoči čezmorskim državam in ozemljem, za katere se uporablja četrti del Pogodbe ES [1], zlasti členov 1(4) in 6 Notranjega sporazuma,
The Government of Sudan decided not to ratify the Partnership Agreement between the Members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific group of States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000 [2], as first amended in Luxembourg on 25 June 2005 [3], thereby losing access to the 10th European Development Fund (EDF) National Indicative Programme (NIP) with a total allocation of EUR 294,9 million, which is now kept in the 10th EDF.
Sudanska vlada se je odločila, da ne bo ratificirala Sporazuma o partnerstvu med članicami skupine afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi strani, podpisanega v Cotonouju dne 23. junija 2000 [2] in prvič spremenjenega v Luxembourgu dne 25. junija 2005 [3], s čimer je izgubila dostop do finančnih sredstev iz nacionalnega okvirnega programa v okviru desetega evropskega razvojnega sklada (ERS) v skupnem znesku 294,9 milijona EUR, ki so zdaj hranjena v desetem ERS.
The current political situation in Sudan, as well as the humanitarian crisis in Darfur, South Sudan, East Sudan and the Transitional Areas, requires a strong engagement of the European Union, including through the provision of vital assistance to the Sudanese population.
Evropska unija si mora odločno prizadevati za reševanje trenutnih političnih razmer v Sudanu ter resne humanitarne krize v Darfurju, Južnem Sudanu, Vzhodnem Sudanu in na prehodnih območjih, vključno z zagotavljanjem nujno potrebne pomoči za sudansko prebivalstvo.
The gap left by the non-availability of the 10th EDF will seriously reduce the capacity of the Union to assist the population and to help stabilise the country, which could have consequences for the wider region.
Ker sredstva iz desetega ERS niso na voljo, se bo precej zmanjšala zmožnost Unije, da pomaga prebivalstvu in prispeva k stabilizaciji države, kar ima lahko negativne posledice za širšo regijo.
In order to bridge the financing gap which will occur, it is appropriate to use funds decommitted from the ninth and previous EDFs.
Za premostitev finančne vrzeli, ki se bo pojavila, je ustrezno uporabiti sredstva, prerazporejena iz devetega ERS in prejšnjih ERS.
The funds should be used to address the needs of the most vulnerable populations in Sudan, in particular in the conflict-affected areas, including Darfur, South Sudan, East Sudan and the Transitional Areas.
Sredstva je treba porabiti za zadovoljevanje potreb najbolj ranljivega prebivalstva v Sudanu, zlasti na konfliktnih območjih, vključno z Darfurjem, Južnim Sudanom, Vzhodnim Sudanom in prehodnimi območji.
They will be allocated on the basis of a financing decision to be adopted by the Commission.
Prerazporejena bodo na podlagi sklepa o financiranju, ki ga sprejme Komisija.
Provision should also be made to cover the cost of support measures.
Določiti je treba tudi, da se krijejo stroški podpornih ukrepov.
These funds should be managed through centralised and joint management and, for the purpose of simplification, according to the implementation arrangements for the 10th EDF,
Ta sredstva se upravljajo prek centraliziranega in skupnega upravljanja ter zaradi poenostavitve v skladu z izvedbenimi določbami za deseti ERS –
An amount of EUR 150 million from the funds decommitted from projects under the ninth and previous EDFs shall be allocated for the purpose of addressing the needs of the most vulnerable population in Sudan; 2 % of this amount shall be allocated for support expenditure by the Commission.
Znesek 150 milijonov EUR iz sredstev, prerazporejenih iz projektov devetega ERS in prejšnjih ERS, se dodeli za zadovoljevanje potreb najbolj ranljivega prebivalstva v Sudanu; 2 % tega zneska Komisija dodeli za odhodke za podporo.
These funds shall be managed through centralised and joint management in accordance with the rules and procedures applicable for the 10th EDF.
Ta sredstva se upravljajo prek centraliziranega in skupnega upravljanja v skladu s pravili in postopki, ki se uporabljajo za deseti ERS.
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following its adoption.
Ta sklep začne veljati na dan po sprejetju.
on the existence of an excessive deficit in Denmark
o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja na Danskem
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 126(6) in conjunction with Article 126(13) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 126(6) v povezavi s členom 126(13) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the observations made by Denmark,
ob upoštevanju pripomb, ki jih je predložila Danska,
Having taken into account its report in accordance with Article 126(3) and having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Financial Committee in accordance with Article 126(4), the Commission concluded that an excessive deficit exists in Denmark.
Komisija je na podlagi svojega poročila po členu 126(3) in mnenja Ekonomsko-finančnega odbora po členu 126(4) ugotovila, da na Danskem obstaja čezmerni primanjkljaj.
The Commission therefore addressed such an opinion to the Council in respect of Denmark on 15 June 2010 [3].
Komisija je zato 15. junija 2010 Svetu predložila zadevno mnenje v zvezi z Dansko [3].
In the case of Denmark, this overall assessment leads to the following conclusions.
V primeru Danske je Svet na podlagi te celovite ocene ugotovil naslednje.
According to data notified by the Danish authorities in April 2010, the general government deficit in Denmark is planned to reach 5,4 % of GDP in 2010, thus exceeding the 3 % of GDP reference value.
Po podatkih, ki so jih danski organi sporočili aprila 2010, naj bi javnofinančni primanjkljaj Danske v letu 2010 dosegel 5,4 % BDP in tako presegel referenčno vrednost 3 % BDP.
The planned deficit is not close to the 3 % of GDP reference value, but the planned excess over the reference value can be qualified as exceptional within the meaning of the Treaty and the Stability and Growth Pact.
Načrtovani primanjkljaj ni blizu referenčne vrednosti 3 % BDP, vendar načrtovano preseganje referenčne vrednosti lahko velja za izjemno v smislu Pogodbe ter Pakta za stabilnost in rast.
In particular, it resulted from a severe economic downturn in the sense of the Treaty and the Stability and Growth Pact.
Zlasti je to posledica resnega upada gospodarske rasti v smislu Pogodbe ter Pakta za stabilnost in rast.
According to the Commission services’ spring 2010 forecast, the deficit would decline to 4,9 % of GDP in 2011 on a no-policy-change [4] basis.
Na podlagi napovedi služb Komisije iz pomladi 2010 bi primanjkljaj v letu 2011 dosegel približno 4,9 % BDP, če se politika ne bo spremenila [4].
According to data notified by the Danish authorities in April 2010, the general government gross debt remains below the 60 % of GDP reference value, at 45,1 % of GDP in 2010.
Po podatkih, ki so jih danski organi sporočili aprila 2010, bruto javni dolg ostaja precej pod referenčno vrednostjo 60 % BDP in leta 2010 znaša 45,1 % BDP.
The Commission services’ spring 2010 forecast projects the debt ratio to be at 46 % of GDP in 2010 and to increase to 49,5 % of GDP in 2011, still to remain below the 60 % of GDP reference value.
Napoved služb Komisije iz pomladi 2010 kaže, da bo delež dolga v letu 2010 znašal 46 % BDP, v letu 2011 pa se bo povečal na 49,5 % BDP, tako da bo še vedno pod referenčno vrednostjo 60 % BDP.
The debt criterion in the Treaty is fulfilled.
Merilo glede dolga, določeno v Pogodbi, je izpolnjeno.
According to Article 2(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97, ‘relevant factors’ can only be taken into account in the steps leading to the Council decision on the existence of an excessive deficit in accordance with Article 126(6) if the double condition – that the deficit remains close to the reference value and that its excess over the reference value is temporary – is fully met.
V skladu s členom 2(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1467/97 se „pomembni dejavniki“ v korakih, ki vodijo do odločitve Sveta o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja v skladu s členom 126(6), lahko upoštevajo le, če je v celoti izpolnjen dvojni pogoj – da primanjkljaj ostaja blizu referenčne vrednosti in da je referenčna vrednost presežena začasno.
In the case of Denmark, this double condition is not met.
V primeru Danske ta dvojni pogoj ni izpolnjen.
From an overall assessment it follows that an excessive deficit exists in Denmark.
Iz celovite ocene sledi, da na Danskem obstaja čezmerni primanjkljaj.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Denmark.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Kraljevino Dansko.
All EDP-related documents for Denmark can be found at the following website: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/sgp/deficit/countries/index_en.htm
Vsi dokumenti za Dansko, povezani s postopkom v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, so na voljo na spletni strani: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/sgp/deficit/countries/index_en.htm
The no-policy-change forecast takes into account the (partial) withdrawal of measures of extraordinary nature linked to the crisis.
Pri napovedi ob nespremenjeni politiki se upošteva (delni) umik izrednih ukrepov, povezanih s krizo.
According to the Commission services’ 2010 spring forecast, real GDP in Denmark contracted by 4,9 % in 2009 and is projected to recover at 1,6 % in 2010.
Po napovedi služb Komisije iz pomladi 2010 naj bi se realni BDP na Danskem po zmanjšanju za 4,9 % v letu 2009 popravil na 1,6 % v letu 2010.
The deficit in 2010 is a consequence of both the economic downturn and the stimulus measures taken in line with the EERP by the Danish authorities.
Primanjkljaj v letu 2010 je posledica upada gospodarske rasti in ukrepov spodbujanja, ki so jih danski organi sprejeli v skladu z evropskim načrtom za oživitev gospodarstva.
on the existence of an excessive deficit in Finland
o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja na Finskem
Having regard to the observations made by Finland,
ob upoštevanju pripomb, ki jih je predložila Finska,
Article 126(5) of the Treaty requires the Commission to address an opinion to the Council if the Commission considers that an excessive deficit in a Member State exists or may occur.
V skladu s členom 126(5) Pogodbe mora Komisija Svetu predložiti mnenje, če meni, da v državi članici obstaja čezmerni primanjkljaj ali bi do njega lahko prišlo.
Having taken into account its report in accordance with Article 126(3) and having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Financial Committee in accordance with Article 126(4), the Commission concluded that an excessive deficit exists in Finland.
Komisija je na podlagi svojega poročila po členu 126(3) in mnenja Ekonomsko-finančnega odbora po členu 126(4) ugotovila, da na Finskem obstaja čezmerni primanjkljaj.
The Commission therefore addressed such an opinion to the Council in respect of Finland on 15 June 2010 [3].
Komisija je zato 15. junija 2010 Svetu predložila zadevno mnenje v zvezi s Finsko [3].
In the case of Finland, this overall assessment leads to the following conclusions.
V primeru Finske je Svet na podlagi te celovite ocene ugotovil naslednje.
According to the data notified by the Finnish authorities in April 2010, the general government deficit in Finland is planned to reach 4,1 % of GDP in 2010, thus exceeding the 3 % of GDP reference value.
Po podatkih, ki so jih finski organi sporočili aprila 2010, bo načrtovani javnofinančni primanjkljaj Finske v letu 2010 dosegel 4,1 % BDP in tako presegel referenčno vrednost 3 % BDP.
While the third supplementary budget presented by the Ministry of Finance to the Parliament on 14 May 2010 suggests that tax revenues in 2010 could turn out higher than planned, this has not officially altered the deficit target.
Čeprav tretji rebalans proračuna, ki ga je ministrstvo za finance parlamentu predložilo 14. maja 2010, nakazuje, da bi lahko bili davčni prihodki v letu 2010 večji od pričakovanih, načrtovani primanjkljaj ni bil uradno spremenjen.
In particular, it does result from a severe economic downturn in the sense of the Treaty and the Stability and Growth Pact.
Je predvsem posledica resnega upada gospodarske rasti v smislu Pogodbe ter Pakta za stabilnost in rast.
Furthermore, the planned excess over the reference value can be considered temporary.
Poleg tega je mogoče oceniti, da je načrtovano preseganje referenčne vrednosti začasno.
According to the Commission services’ spring 2010 forecast, the deficit will fall below the reference value in 2011, supported by the projected economic recovery taking hold.
Po napovedi služb Komisije iz pomladi 2010 bo primanjkljaj v letu 2011 ob podpori napovedane oživitve gospodarstva padel pod referenčno vrednost.
According to the data notified by the Finnish authorities in April 2010, the general government gross debt remains below the 60 % of GDP reference value at 49,9 % of GDP in 2010.
Po podatkih, ki so jih finski organi sporočili aprila 2010, bruto javni dolg ostaja precej pod referenčno vrednostjo 60 % BDP in za leto 2010 znaša 49,9 % BDP.
The Commission services’ spring 2010 forecast projects the debt ratio to be at 50,5 % of GDP in 2010 and to increase to 54,9 % of GDP in 2011, still to remain below the 60 % of GDP reference value.
Napoved služb Komisije iz pomladi 2010 kaže, da bo razmerje dolga do BDP v letu 2010 znašalo 50,5 %, v letu 2011 pa se bo povečalo na 54,9 % BDP, tako da bo še vedno pod referenčno vrednostjo 60 % BDP.
According to Article 2(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97, ‘relevant factors’ can only be taken into account in the steps leading to the Council decision on the existence of an excessive deficit in accordance with Article 126(6) if the double condition – that the deficit remains close to the reference value and that its excess over the reference value is temporary – is fully met.
V skladu s členom 2(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1467/97 se „pomembni dejavniki“ v korakih, ki vodijo do odločitve Sveta o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja v skladu s členom 126(6), lahko upoštevajo le, če je v celoti izpolnjen dvojni pogoj – da primanjkljaj ostaja blizu referenčne vrednosti in da je referenčna vrednost presežena začasno.
In the case of Finland, this double condition is not met.
V primeru Finske ta dvojni pogoj ni izpolnjen.
From an overall assessment it follows that an excessive deficit exists in Finland.
Iz celovite ocene sledi, da na Finskem obstaja čezmerni primanjkljaj.
All EDP-related documents for Finland can be found at the following website: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/sgp/deficit/countries/index_en.htm
Vsi dokumenti za Finsko, povezani s postopkom v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, so na voljo na spletni strani: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/sgp/deficit/countries/index_en.htm
of 19 July 2010
z dne 19. julija 2010
on Common Safety Targets as referred to in Article 7 of Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o skupnih varnostnih ciljih iz člena 7 Direktive 2004/49/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(notified under document C(2010) 4889)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 4889)
Having regard to Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on safety on the Community’s railways and amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings and Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification (Railway Safety Directive) [1], and in particular Article 7 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2004/49/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o varnosti na železnicah Skupnosti ter o spremembi Direktive Sveta 95/18/ES o izdaji licence prevoznikom v železniškem prometu in Direktive 2001/14/ES o dodeljevanju železniških infrastrukturnih zmogljivosti, naložitvi uporabnin za uporabo železniške infrastrukture in podeljevanju varnostnega spričevala (Direktiva o varnosti na železnici) [1] ter zlasti člena 7 Direktive,
Having regard to the recommendation of the European Railway Agency on the first set of Common Safety Targets, delivered to the Commission on 18 September 2009,
ob upoštevanju priporočila Evropske agencije za železniški promet o prvi skupini skupnih varnostnih ciljev, ki je bilo Komisiji predloženo 18. septembra 2009,
According to Directive 2004/49/EC, Common Safety Targets (CSTs) should be gradually introduced to ensure that a high level of safety is maintained and, when and where necessary and reasonably practicable, improved.
V skladu z Direktivo 2004/49/ES je treba skupne varnostne cilje uvajati postopno, da se ohrani visoka raven varnosti in da se ta izboljša, kadar je to potrebno in izvedljivo.
They should provide tools for assessment of the safety level and the performance of the operators at EU level as well as in Member States.
Zagotoviti morajo sredstva za oceno stopnje varnosti in delovanja izvajalcev na ravni Unije in v državah članicah.
Article 3(e) of Directive 2004/49/EC defines CSTs as the safety levels that must at least be reached by different parts of the railway system (such as the conventional railway system, the high speed railway system, long railway tunnels or lines solely used for freight transport) and by the system as a whole, expressed in risk acceptance criteria.
V členu 3(e) Direktive 2004/49/ES so skupni varnosti cilji opredeljeni kot najmanjše stopnje varnosti, izražene v merilih za sprejemljivost tveganja, ki jih morajo doseči različni deli železniškega sistema (kakor so železniški sistem za konvencionalne hitrosti, železniški sistem za visoke hitrosti, dolgi železniški predori ali proge, ki se uporabljajo samo za tovorni promet) in celotni sistem.
However, Recital 7 of Commission Decision 2009/460/EC of 5 June 2009 on the adoption of a common safety method for assessment of achievement of safety targets, as referred to in Article 6 of Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] states that, due to the lack of harmonised and reliable data on safety performance of parts of rail systems which are in operation in the different Member States, the development of the first set of CSTs for parts of the rail system (such as the conventional rail system, the high speed rail system, long railway tunnels or lines solely used for freight transport) is not feasible.
Uvodna izjava 7 Odločbe Komisije 2009/460/ES z dne 5. junija 2009 o sprejetju skupne varnostne metode za oceno doseganja varnostnih ciljev, kot je navedeno v členu 6 Direktive 2004/49/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2], pa navaja, da zaradi pomanjkanja usklajenih in zanesljivih podatkov o ravni varnosti delov železniških sistemov, ki delujejo v različnih državah članicah, razvoj prve skupine skupnih varnostnih ciljev za dele železniškega sistema (kot je železniški sistem za konvencionalne hitrosti, železniški sistem za visoke hitrosti ali proge, ki se uporabljajo samo za tovorni promet) ni mogoč.
Article 7(3) of Directive 2004/49/EC requires that the first set of CSTs should be based on an examination of existing targets and safety performance of railway systems in the Member States.
Člen 7(3) Direktive 2004/49/ES določa, da mora prva skupina skupnih varnostnih ciljev temeljiti na preučitvi sedanjih ciljev in varnostne učinkovitosti železniških sistemov v državah članicah.
According to the methodology established by Decision 2009/460/EC, the first set of CSTs is to be based on National Reference Values (NRVs).
V skladu z metodologijo, določeno v Odločbi 2009/460/ES, mora prva skupina skupnih varnostnih ciljev temeljiti na nacionalnih referenčnih vrednostih.
It has been calculated using series of data based on Regulation (EC) No 91/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on rail transport statistics [3] and provided by Eurostat on 6 March 2009 for the period 2004-2007.
Izračunana je bila z uporabo serije podatkov, ki temelji na Uredbi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 91/2003 z dne 16. decembra 2002 o statistiki železniškega prevoza [3] in jo je 6. marca 2009 predložil Eurostat za obdobje 2004–2007.