natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is very difficult to adopt Community legislation for every product which exists or which may be developed; there is a need for a broad-based, legislative framework of a horizontal nature to deal with such products, to cover lacunae, in particular pending revision of existing specific legislation, and to complement provisions in existing or future specific legislation, in particular with a view to ensuring a high level of protection of health, safety, the environment and consumers, as required by Article 95 of the Treaty.
Zelo težko je sprejeti zakonodajo Skupnosti za vsak obstoječi proizvod ali za proizvod, ki bo lahko še razvit; za obravnavo takih proizvodov je potreben široko zasnovan horizontalen zakonski okvir, ki bo odpravljal pravno praznino, zlasti dokler ne bo opravljena revizija veljavne posebne zakonodaje, in dopolnjeval določbe veljavne ali načrtovane posebne zakonodaje, zlasti da se zagotovi visoka raven varnosti in zdravja potrošnikov, varstva okolja in potrošnikov, kakor to zahteva člen 95 Pogodbe.
The framework for market surveillance established by this Regulation should complement and strengthen existing provisions in Community harmonisation legislation relating to market surveillance and the enforcement of such provisions.
V tej uredbi določeni okvir za nadzor trga bi moral dopolniti in okrepiti veljavne določbe v usklajevalni zakonodaji Skupnosti v zvezi z nadzorom trga in uveljavljanje teh določb.
However, in accordance with the principle of lex specialis, this Regulation should apply only in so far as there are no specific provisions with the same objective, nature or effect in other existing or future rules of Community harmonisation legislation.
Vendar bi se v skladu z načelom lex specialis ta uredba morala uporabljati le, v kolikor ni posebnih določb z istim ciljem, naravo ali učinkom, kot ga imajo tiste, ki so vzpostavljene v drugih veljavnih ali prihodnjih določbah usklajevalne zakonodaje Skupnosti.
Examples can be found in the following sectors: drug precursors, medical devices, medicinal products for human and veterinary use, motor vehicles and aviation.
Primere lahko najdemo v naslednjih sektorjih: predhodne sestavine, medicinski pripomočki, medicinski proizvodi za humano in veterinarsko rabo, motorna vozila in letalstvo.
The corresponding provisions of this Regulation should not therefore apply in the areas covered by such specific provisions.
Ustrezne določbe te uredbe se torej ne bi smele uporabljati na področjih, za katera veljajo take posebne določbe.
Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety established rules to ensure the safety of consumer products.
Direktiva 2001/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 3. decembra 2001 o splošni varnosti proizvodov je določila pravila za zagotavljanje varnosti proizvodov za potrošnike.
Market surveillance authorities should have the possibility of taking the more specific measures available to them under that Directive.
Organi za nadzor trga bi morali imeti možnost, da sprejmejo bolj specifične ukrepe, ki so jim na voljo na podlagi navedene direktive.
However, in order to achieve a higher level of safety for consumer products, the market surveillance mechanisms provided for in Directive 2001/95/EC should be reinforced as regards products presenting a serious risk, in accordance with the principles established by this Regulation.
Da pa bi dosegli višjo stopnjo varnosti potrošniških proizvodov, bi bilo treba okrepiti mehanizme nadzora trga iz Direktive 2001/95/ES v zvezi s proizvodi, ki predstavljajo resno nevarnost, v skladu z istimi načeli, kakor so določena v tej uredbi.
Directive 2001/95/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Direktivo 2001/95/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Accreditation is part of an overall system, including conformity assessment and market surveillance, designed to assess and ensure conformity with the applicable requirements.
Akreditacija je del celotnega sistema, vključno z ugotavljanjem skladnosti in nadzorom trga, da se oceni in zagotovi skladnost z veljavnimi zahtevami.
The particular value of accreditation lies in the fact that it provides an authoritative statement of the technical competence of bodies whose task is to ensure conformity with the applicable requirements.
Posebna prednost akreditacije je v tem, da predstavlja uradno izjavo o strokovni usposobljenosti organov, katerih naloga je zagotavljanje skladnosti z veljavnimi zahtevami.
Accreditation, though so far not regulated at Community level, is carried out in all Member States.
Čeprav akreditacija še ni urejena na ravni Skupnosti, se izvaja v vseh državah članicah.
The lack of common rules for that activity has resulted in different approaches and differing systems throughout the Community, with the result that the degree of rigour applied in the performance of accreditation has varied between Member States.
Odsotnost skupnih pravil za to dejavnost je privedla do različnih pristopov in različnih sistemov po vsej Skupnosti, posledica česar je bila, da se je raven strogosti, uporabljene pri izvajanju akreditacije, pri posameznih državah članicah razlikovala.
It is therefore necessary to develop a comprehensive framework for accreditation and to lay down at Community level the principles for its operation and organisation.
Zato je treba oblikovati celosten okvir za akreditacijo in na ravni Skupnosti določiti načela za njegovo delovanje in organizacijo.
The establishment of a uniform national accreditation body should be without prejudice to the allocation of functions within Member States.
Ustanovitev enotnega nacionalnega akreditacijskega organa ne bi smela vplivati na razdelitev nalog v državah članicah.
Where Community harmonisation legislation provides for the selection of conformity assessment bodies for its implementation, transparent accreditation, as provided for in this Regulation, ensuring the necessary level of confidence in conformity certificates, should be considered by the national public authorities throughout the Community the preferred means of demonstrating the technical competence of those bodies.
Kjer usklajevalna zakonodaja Skupnosti za svoje izvajanje predvideva izbiranje organov za ugotavljanje skladnosti, bi morali pregledno akreditacijo, kakršna je predvidena v tej uredbi za zagotovitev potrebne stopnje zaupanja v certifikate o skladnosti, javni nacionalni organi v celotni Skupnosti šteti za prednostni način, s katerim ti organi dokažejo svojo tehnično usposobljenost.
In such cases, in order to ensure the appropriate level of credibility of evaluations carried out by other national authorities, they should provide the Commission and the other Member States with the necessary documentary evidence demonstrating the compliance of the conformity assessment bodies evaluated with the relevant regulatory requirements.
Da se zagotovi primerna stopnja verodostojnosti presoje drugih nacionalnih organov, bi morali v takih primerih ti organi Komisiji in drugim državam članicam zagotoviti potrebno dokumentacijo, ki dokazuje, da ocenjeni organi za zagotavljanje skladnosti izpolnjujejo ustrezne predpisane zahteve.
A system of accreditation which functions by reference to binding rules helps to strengthen mutual confidence between Member States as regards the competence of conformity assessment bodies and consequently the certificates and test reports issued by them.
Sistem akreditacije, ki deluje s sklicevanjem na obvezujoča pravila, prispeva h krepitvi vzajemnega zaupanja med državami članicami v usposobljenost organov za ugotavljanje skladnosti ter posledično v certifikate in poročila o preskusih, ki jih ti organi izdajo.
It thereby enhances the principle of mutual recognition and therefore the provisions of this Regulation on accreditation should apply in relation to bodies carrying out conformity assessments in both the regulated and the non-regulated areas.
Tako krepi načelo vzajemnega priznavanja, zato bi se morale določbe o akreditaciji v tej uredbi uporabljati za organe, ki izvajajo ugotavljanje skladnosti na zakonsko urejenih in neurejenih področjih.
The issue at stake is the quality of certificates and test reports irrespective of whether they fall within the regulated or the non-regulated area, and no distinction should therefore be made between those areas.
Gre za kakovost certifikatov in poročil o preskusih ne glede na to, ali spadajo na zakonsko urejeno ali neurejeno področje, zato se med temi področji ne bi smelo razlikovati.
For the purposes of this Regulation, not-for-profit operation by a national accreditation body should be understood as an activity that is not intended to add any gain to the resources of the body's owners or members.
Za namene te uredbe bi morali nacionalni akreditacijski organi delovati na neprofitni osnovi, kar pomeni da njihove dejavnosti ne stremijo k denarnemu dobičku, ki bi ga prejeli lastniki ali člani organa.
While national accreditation bodies do not have the objective of maximising or distributing profits, they may provide services in return for payment, or receive income.
Cilj nacionalnih akreditacijskih organov ni povečevanje ali razdeljevanje dobička, lahko pa nudijo storitve v zameno za plačilo ali prejemajo dohodek.
Any excess revenue that results from such services may be used for investment to develop their activities further, as long as it is in line with their main activities.
Prihodki, ki presegajo stroške in izhajajo iz teh storitev, so lahko uporabljeni za naložbe v nadaljnji razvoj njihovih dejavnosti, če je to v skladu z njihovimi glavnimi dejavnostmi.
It should accordingly be emphasised that the primary objective of national accreditation bodies should be to support or engage actively in activities that are not intended to produce any gain.
Zato bi bilo treba poudariti, da bi moral biti bistveni cilj nacionalnih akreditacijskih organov še vedno podpiranje ali aktivno sodelovanje pri dejavnostih, ki ne stremijo k denarnemu dobičku.
Since the purpose of accreditation is to provide an authoritative statement of the competence of a body to perform conformity assessment activities, Member States should not maintain more than one national accreditation body and should ensure that that body is organised in such a way as to safeguard the objectivity and impartiality of its activities.
Ker je namen akreditacije zagotovitev uradne izjave o usposobljenosti organa za izvajanje dejavnosti ugotavljanja skladnosti, države članice ne bi smele imeti več kot en nacionalni akreditacijski organ in bi morale zagotoviti, da je organiziran tako, da zagotavlja objektivnost in nepristranskost svojih dejavnosti.
Such national accreditation bodies should operate independently of commercial conformity assessment activities.
Taki nacionalni akreditacijski organi bi morali delovati neodvisno od komercialnih dejavnosti ugotavljanja skladnosti.
It is therefore appropriate to provide that Member States ensure that, in the performance of their tasks, national accreditation bodies are deemed to exercise public authority, irrespective of their legal status.
Zato je primerno določiti, da naj države članice zagotovijo, da se šteje, da nacionalni akreditacijski organi pri izvajanju svojih nalog ne glede na svoj pravni status izvršujejo dejavnost javnega organa.
For the assessment and continued monitoring of the competence of a conformity assessment body, it is essential to determine its technological knowledge and experience and its ability to carry out assessment.
Za ocenjevanje in nenehno spremljanje usposobljenosti organa za ugotavljanje skladnosti je nujno določiti njegovo tehnološko znanje in izkušnje ter sposobnost izvajanja ugotavljanja skladnosti.
It is therefore necessary that the national accreditation body possess the relevant knowledge, competence and means for the proper performance of its tasks.
Zato je nujno, da ima nacionalni akreditacijski organ primerno znanje, usposobljenost in sredstva za ustrezno izvajanje svojih nalog.
Accreditation should in principle be operated as a self-supporting activity.
Akreditacija bi morala načeloma potekati kot samostojna dejavnost.
Member States should ensure that financial support exists for the fulfilment of special tasks.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da obstaja finančna podpora za izpolnjevanje posebnih nalog.
In those cases where it is not economically meaningful or sustainable for a Member State to establish a national accreditation body, that Member State should have recourse to the national accreditation body of another Member State and should be encouraged to have such recourse to the fullest extent possible.
V primerih, kjer ni ekonomsko smiselno ali vzdržno, da država članica ustanovi nacionalni akreditacijski organ, bi taka država članica morala uporabiti nacionalni akreditacijski organ druge države članice, treba pa bi jo bilo tudi spodbuditi, da to možnost izkoristi v čim večjem možnem obsegu.
Competition between national accreditation bodies could lead to the commercialisation of their activity, which would be incompatible with their role as the last level of control in the conformity assessment chain.
Konkurenca med nacionalnimi akreditacijskimi organi bi lahko pripeljala do komercializacije njihove dejavnosti, kar bi bilo nezdružljivo z njihovo vlogo, ki jo imajo kot zadnja stopnja nadzora v verigi ugotavljanja skladnosti.
The objective of this Regulation is to ensure that, within the European Union, one accreditation certificate is sufficient for the whole territory of the Union, and to avoid multiple accreditation, which is added cost without added value.
Cilj te uredbe je zagotoviti, da bo v Evropski uniji za celotno ozemlje Unije zadostoval en certifikat o akreditaciji, in preprečiti obstoj večkratnih akreditacij, kar bi le povečalo stroške ne pa vrednosti.
National accreditation bodies may find themselves in competition on the markets of third countries, but that must have no effect on their activities inside the Community, or on the cooperation and peer evaluation activities organised by the body recognised under this Regulation.
Nacionalni akreditacijski organi so lahko konkurenčni na trgih tretjih držav, vendar to ne sme imeti nobenih posledic za njihove dejavnosti v Skupnosti ali za dejavnosti medsebojnega strokovnega vrednotenja, ki jih pripravi organ, priznan na podlagi te uredbe.
In order to avoid multiple accreditation, to enhance acceptance and recognition of accreditation certificates and to carry out effective monitoring of accredited conformity assessment bodies, conformity assessment bodies should request accreditation by the national accreditation body of the Member State in which they are established.
Da se prepreči večkratnost akreditacije, poveča sprejemanje in priznavanje certifikatov o akreditaciji ter da se izvaja učinkovito spremljanje pooblaščenih organov za ugotavljanje skladnosti, bi morali organi za ugotavljanje skladnosti zaprositi za akreditacijo pri nacionalnem akreditacijskem organu države članice, v kateri imajo sedež.
Nevertheless, it is necessary to ensure that a conformity assessment body is able to request accreditation in another Member State in the event that there is no national accreditation body in its own Member State or where the national accreditation body is not competent to provide the accreditation services requested.
Kljub temu je treba zagotoviti, da ima organ za ugotavljanje skladnosti možnost zaprositi za akreditacijo v drugi državi članici, kadar v njegovi državi članici ni nacionalnega akreditacijskega organa ali kadar nacionalni akreditacijski organ ni usposobljen za opravljanje zahtevanih storitev akreditacije.
In such cases, appropriate cooperation and exchange of information between national accreditation bodies should be established.
V takih primerih bi bilo treba vzpostaviti ustrezno sodelovanje in izmenjavo informacij med nacionalnimi akreditacijskimi organi.
In order to ensure that national accreditation bodies fulfil the requirements and obligations provided for in this Regulation, it is important that Member States support the proper functioning of the accreditation system, monitor their national accreditation bodies regularly and take appropriate corrective measures within a reasonable timeframe where necessary.
Da se zagotovi, da nacionalni akreditacijski organi izpolnjujejo zahteve in obveznosti iz te uredbe, je pomembno, da države članice podpirajo pravilno delovanje akreditacijskega sistema, izvajajo redno spremljanje svojih nacionalnih akreditacijskih organov in po potrebi v razumnem času sprejmejo ustrezne korektivne ukrepe.
In order to ensure the equivalence of the level of competence of conformity assessment bodies, to facilitate mutual recognition and to promote the overall acceptance of accreditation certificates and conformity assessment results issued by accredited bodies, it is necessary that national accreditation bodies operate a rigorous and transparent peer evaluation system and regularly undergo such evaluation.
Da se zagotovi enakovredna raven usposobljenosti organov za ugotavljanje skladnosti, olajša vzajemno priznavanje ter spodbudi splošno sprejemanje certifikatov o akreditaciji in rezultatov ugotavljanja skladnosti, ki jih izdajajo pooblaščeni organi, morajo nacionalni akreditacijski organi izvajati strog in pregleden sistem medsebojnega strokovnega vrednotenja ter redno opravljati taka vrednotenja.
This Regulation should provide for the recognition of a single organisation at European level in respect of certain functions in the field of accreditation.
Ta uredba bi morala zagotoviti priznanje ene same organizacije na evropski ravni glede nekaterih nalog v zvezi z akreditacijo.
The European cooperation for Accreditation (the EA), whose main mission is to promote a transparent and quality-led system for the evaluation of the competence of conformity assessment bodies throughout Europe, manages a peer evaluation system among national accreditation bodies from the Member States and other European countries.
Evropsko združenje za akreditacijo (EA), katerega glavna naloga je spodbujati pregleden in kakovostno voden sistem za vrednotenje usposobljenosti organov za ugotavljanje skladnosti po vsej Evropi, upravlja sistem medsebojnega strokovnega vrednotenja med nacionalnimi akreditacijskimi organi iz držav članic in drugih evropskih držav.
That system has proved to be efficient and to provide mutual confidence.
Izkazalo se je, da je ta sistem učinkovit in zagotavlja vzajemno zaupanje.
The EA should, therefore, be the first body recognised under this Regulation and Member States should ensure that their national accreditation bodies seek and maintain membership of the EA for as long as it is so recognised.
Zato bi EA moral biti organ, ki se prvotno prizna na podlagi te uredbe, države članice pa bi morale poskrbeti, da si njihovi nacionalni akreditacijski organi prizadevajo za članstvo v EA in ga ohranijo, dokler bo ta organ priznan.
At the same time, the possibility of changing the relevant body recognised under this Regulation should be provided for, in case there is a need for it in the future.
Istočasno bi bilo treba zagotoviti možnost spremembe zadevnega organa, ki je priznan po tej uredbi, če bo to potrebno v prihodnosti.
Effective cooperation among national accreditation bodies is essential for the proper implementation of peer evaluation and with regard to cross-border accreditation.
Učinkovito sodelovanje med nacionalnimi akreditacijskimi organi je bistvenega pomena za pravilno izvajanje medsebojnega strokovnega vrednotenja in za čezmejno akreditacijo.
In the interests of transparency, it is, therefore, necessary to provide for an obligation on national accreditation bodies to exchange information among themselves and to provide the national authorities and the Commission with relevant information.
Zaradi preglednosti je torej treba določiti obveznost nacionalnih akreditacijskih organov za medsebojno izmenjavo informacij ter zagotavljati ustrezne informacije nacionalnim organom in Komisiji.
Updated and accurate information concerning the availability of accreditation activities operated by national accreditation bodies should also be made public and, therefore, accessible, in particular to conformity assessment bodies.
Najnovejše in točne informacije o razpoložljivosti akreditacijskih dejavnosti, ki jih opravljajo nacionalni akreditacijski organi, bi bilo treba tudi objaviti in torej dati na voljo zlasti organom za ugotavljanje skladnosti.
Sectoral accreditation schemes should cover the fields of activity where general requirements for the competence of conformity assessment bodies are not sufficient to ensure the necessary level of protection where specific detailed technology or health and safety-related requirements are imposed.
Sheme sektorske akreditacije bi morale pokrivati področja dejavnosti, na katerih splošne zahteve za usposobljenost organov za ugotavljanje skladnosti niso zadostno zagotovilo za ustrezno raven varnosti, kadar so določene posebne podrobne zahteve glede tehnologije ali varovanja zdravja.
Given the fact that the EA has at its disposal a broad range of technical expertise, it should be requested to develop such schemes, especially for areas covered by Community legislation.
Glede na to, da ima EA na voljo širok nabor strokovnih izkušenj in znanja, bi ga bilo treba povabiti, da oblikuje take sheme, zlasti za področja, ki jih zajema zakonodaja Skupnosti.
For the purpose of ensuring the equivalent and consistent enforcement of Community harmonisation legislation, this Regulation introduces a Community market surveillance framework, defining minimum requirements against the background of the objectives to be achieved by Member States and a framework for administrative cooperation including the exchange of information among Member States.
Za potrebe zagotavljanja enakovrednega in doslednega izvajanja usklajevalne zakonodaje Skupnosti ta uredba uvaja okvir za nadzor trga Skupnosti, ki določa minimalne zahteve na podlagi ciljev, ki jih morajo doseči države članice, in okvir za upravno sodelovanje, vključno z izmenjavo informacij med državami članicami.
In the case of economic operators in possession of test reports or certificates attesting conformity issued by an accredited conformity assessment body, where the relevant Community harmonisation legislation does not require such reports or certificates, market surveillance authorities should take due account of them when performing checks on product characteristics.
V primeru gospodarskih subjektov, ki imajo poročila o preskusih ali certifikate, ki dokazujejo skladnost in jih je izdal pooblaščen organ za ugotavljanje skladnosti, kjer jih usklajevalna zakonodaja Skupnosti ne zahteva, bi jih morali organi za nadzor trga ustrezno upoštevati, ko preverjajo lastnosti proizvoda.
Cooperation between competent authorities at national level and across borders in exchanging information, investigating infringements and taking action to bring about their cessation, even before the placing on the market of dangerous products, by reinforcing measures to identify them, mainly in seaports, is essential to the protection of health and safety and to guaranteeing the smooth functioning of the internal market.
Sodelovanje med pristojnimi organi tako na nacionalni ravni kot prek meja pri izmenjavi informacij, preiskovanju kršitev ter ukrepanju, da se kršitve prenehajo, še preden se nevarni proizvodi dajo na trg, z izboljšanjem ukrepov za identifikacijo takšnih proizvodov, zlasti v morskih pristaniščih, je bistveno za varovanje zdravja in varnosti ter za zagotavljanje nemotenega delovanja notranjega trga.
National consumer protection authorities should cooperate, at national level, with national market surveillance authorities and should exchange information with them relating to products which they suspect present a risk.
Nacionalni organi za varstvo potrošnikov morajo sodelovati na nacionalni ravni z nacionalnimi organi za nadzor trga in si z njimi izmenjevati informacije v zvezi s proizvodi, za katere domnevajo, da predstavljajo tveganje.