natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the PPAs constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty, with the exception of the PPA with Żarnowiecka Elektrownia Gazowa Sp. z o.o., and that this state aid is incompatible with the common market;
pogodbe PNE pomenijo državno pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES, razen pogodbe PNE z družbo Żarnowiecka Elektrownia Gazowa Sp. z o. o., in da ta državna pomoč ni združljiva s skupnim trgom;
the Act constitutes state aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty, and that this state aid is compatible with the common market in application of Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty.
Zakon pomeni državno pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES in da je ta državna pomoč združljiva s skupnim trgom na podlagi člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES.
As was explained in point 7.1.1, the state aid element provided for in the PPAs consists principally of the fact that the PPAs guarantee the purchase by PSE of a certain volume of electricity at a price covering all generation costs.
Kot je pojasnjeno v točki 7.1.1, je element državne pomoči, ki je predviden v pogodbah PNE, predvsem to, da pogodbe PNE zagotavljajo, da PSE odkupi določeno količino električne energije po ceni, ki pokriva vse proizvodne stroške.
Since the state aid is incompatible with the EC Treaty, it must be ended.
Ker je državna pomoč nezdružljiva s Pogodbo ES, jo je treba odpraviti.
Since the guaranteed collection and cost-covering guarantee provisions are the core provisions of the PPAs, the Commission concludes that ending the state aid can only be achieved by ending the PPAs themselves.
Ker so določbe o zajamčenem prevzemu in jamstvu za kritje stroškov bistvene določbe pogodb PNE, Komisija ugotavlja, da se lahko državna pomoč odpravi samo tako, da se zaključijo same pogodbe PNE.
The Commission takes the view that ending the PPAs will entail significant work on the part of the parties, particularly as regards agreement on the terms governing the termination of the PPAs.
Komisija meni, da bodo imele stranke zaradi zaključka pogodb PNE precej dela, zlasti kar zadeva dogovor o pogojih, ki urejajo prenehanje teh pogodb.
The Commission takes the view that it is necessary to allow a reasonable time for this process to take place in order to ensure that security of electricity supply remains adequate and that the transition to a fully liberalised market in Poland takes place in good conditions.
Komisija meni, da je treba za uresničitev tega procesa omogočiti primeren rok, da se tako zagotovi, da se ohrani ustrezna zanesljivost oskrbe z električno energijo in da se prehod na popolnoma liberaliziran trg na Poljskem opravi v dobrih razmerah.
These objectives are also in the interest of the Community.
Ti cilji so tudi v interesu Skupnosti.
While drafting the Act within the framework of its national legislative process, Poland consulted all the interested parties on technical matters linked to the voluntary termination of the PPAs.
Poljska se je pri pripravi Zakona v okviru nacionalnega zakonodajnega postopka posvetovala z vsemi zainteresiranim strankami o tehničnih vprašanjih, povezanih s prostovoljnim prenehanjem pogodb PNE.
The Commission takes the view that, pursuant to Article 5 of the Act, the PPAs will be actually terminated on the first day of the month after a period of 210 days has elapsed, starting on the day on which the Act entered into force (i.e. 1 April 2008).
Komisija meni, da bodo v skladu s členom 5 Zakona pogodbe PNE dejansko prenehale prvi dan v mesecu po izteku obdobja 210 dni, ki se začne na dan začetka veljavnosti Zakona (torej 1. aprila 2008).
Accordingly, as indicated in recitals 356 and 375, amounts of aid received by beneficiaries as of 1 May 2004 are caught by the Act and are therefore deemed compatible with the common market,
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 356 in 375, so skladno s tem zneski pomoči, ki so jih upravičenci prejeli od 1. maja 2004, zajeti z Zakonom in torej štejejo za združljive s skupnim trgom.
In the specific case of Żarnowiecka Elektrownia Gazowa Sp. z o.o. the Commission concludes that the plant did not benefit from any aid under its PPA.
V posebnem primeru družbe Żarnowiecka Elektrownia Gazowa Sp. z o. o. Komisija ugotavlja, da ta elektrarna ni imela koristi od pomoči v skladu s svojo pogodbo PNE.
The Power Purchase Agreements between Polskie Sieci Elektroenergetyczne S.A. and the companies indicated in Annex 1 to the Act on the rules governing the covering of costs incurred by enterprises in connection with the early termination of Power Purchase Agreements constitutes state aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty to electricity generators.
Pogodbe o nakupu energije med družbo Polskie Sieci Elektroenergetyczne S. A. in družbami, navedenimi v Prilogi 1 k Zakonu o pravilih glede kritja stroškov, ki bremenijo podjetja v zvezi s predčasnim prenehanjem pogodb o nakupu energije, pomenijo državno pomoč za proizvajalce energije v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
The state aid referred to in Article 1(1) was awarded unlawfully and is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč iz člena 1(1) je bila dodeljena nezakonito in je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
Poland shall terminate the Power Purchase Agreements referred to in Article 1.
Poljska bo prekinila pogodbe o nakupu energije iz člena 1.
The termination agreements for the Power Purchase Agreements shall be concluded by 1 January 2008 and shall enter into force not later than 1 April 2008.
Sporazumi o prenehanju pogodb o nakupu energije bodo sklenjeni do 1. januarja 2008, veljati pa bodo začeli najpozneje 1. aprila 2008.
The Power Purchase Agreement between Polskie Sieci Elektroenergetyczne S.A. and Żarnowiecka Elektrownia Gazowa Sp. z o.o. does not constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Pogodba o nakupu energije med družbo Polskie Sieci Elektroenergetyczne S. A. in družbo Żarnowiecka Elektrownia Gazowa Sp. z o. o. ne pomeni državne pomoči v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
The compensation provided for in the Act constitutes state aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty to the electricity generators listed in Appendix 2 to that Act.
Nadomestilo, ki je predvideno v Zakonu, pomeni državno pomoč za proizvajalce električne energije, naštete v Dodatku 2 k temu zakonu, v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
The state aid referred to in Article 4(1) is compatible with the common market on the basis of the Stranded Costs Methodology.
Državna pomoč iz člena 4(1) je združljiva s skupnim trgom na podlagi metodologije za nasedle stroške.
The maximum amount of compensation provided for in the Act shall be the amount following deduction of the total revenue generated by the assets under the PPAs and which is available to cover investment costs.
Najvišji znesek nadomestila, določen v Zakonu, je znesek po odbitku skupnega prihodka, ki so ga ustvarile naložbe v skladu s pogodbami PNE in je na voljo za kritje stroškov naložb.
The Polish authorities shall inform the Commission by 31 January 2008 of the measures taken by Poland to implement this Decision.
Poljski organi do 31. januarja 2008 obvestijo Komisijo o ukrepih, ki jih je Poljska sprejela za izvajanje te odločbe.
The Polish authorities shall submit to the Commission annual reports on implementation of the Act.
Poljski organi predložijo Komisiji letna poročila o izvajanju Zakona.
OJ C 52, 2.3.2006, p. 8.
UL C 52, 2.3.2006, str. 8.
Adopted by the Commission on 26 July 2001.
Komisija ga je sprejela 26. julija 2001.
In the light of Annex IV to the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic, and the amendments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded (the Accession Act), which forms an integral part of the Treaty of Accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union (the Accession Treaty) (OJ L 236 of 23.9.2003), aid awarded before 10 December 1994 is regarded as existing aid.
Glede na Prilogo IV k Aktu o pogojih pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Cipra, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike in spremembah pogodb, na katerih temelji Evropska unija („Pristopni akt“), ki je sestavni del Pogodbe o pristopu Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Cipra, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike k Evropski uniji ( „Pristopna pogodba“) ( UL L 236, 23.9.2003), pomoč, dodeljena pred 10. decembrom 1994, šteje za obstoječo pomoč.
This PPA was not signed as the result of the tendering procedure.
Ta PNE ni bila podpisana na podlagi postopka javnega razpisa.
this table is based on the documentation provided by the Polish authorities in Appendix 1 to their letter of 2 June 2005, which contains more information than the original notification of the Bill.
Opomba: Ta preglednica temelji na dokumentaciji, ki so jo poljski organi predložili v Dodatku 1 k dopisu z dne 2. junija 2005, in vsebuje več informacij kot prvotna priglasitev osnutka zakona.
Point 3(1)(i) of the decision to initiate the procedure.
Točka 3(1)(i) odločitve o sprožitvi postopka.
OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1
UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1.
Case C-482/99 France v Commission [2002] ECR I-04397.
Zadeva C-482/99, Francija proti Komisiji, Recueil 2002, str. I-04397.
See point 3 (1) (ii) of the decision to initiate the procedure.
Glej točko 3(1)(ii) odločitve o sprožitvi postopka.
Comment submitted by BOT, ENS, ECZG, ECK, ELCHO and PAK.
Pripombe, ki so jih predložili BOT, ENS, ECZG, ECK, ELCHO in PAK.
See footnote 3 above.
Glej opombo 3.
Commission decisions CZ 52/2003 (Universal Banka), CZ 58/2003 (Evrobanka), CZ 46/2003 (Investicni a postowni banka).
Odločitve Komisije CZ 52/03 (Universal Banka), CZ 58/03 (Evrobanka), CZ 46/03 (Investicni a postowni banka).
Comment submitted by ECZG, ECK and the Banks.
Pripombe, ki so jih predložili ECZG, ECK in banke.
Judgement of the Court of First Instance of 15 June 2000 in Joined Cases T-298/97, T-312/97, T-313/97, T-315/97, T-600/97 to T-607/97, T-1/98, T-3/98 to T-6/98 and T-23/98.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 15. junija 2000 v združenih zadevah T-298/97, T-312/97, T-313/97, T-315/97, T-600/97 do T-607/97, T-1/98, T-3/98 do T-6/98 in T-23/98.
Comments submitted by BOT, ENS, ECZG, ECK, ELCHO, Rzeszów, the Banks, PAK, Electrabel and PSE.
Pripombe, ki so jih predložili BOT, ENS, ECZG, ECK, ELCHO, Rzeszów, banke, PAK, Electrabel in PSE.
Wording used by the interested parties.
Izraz, ki so ga uporabile zainteresirane stranke.
Reference to the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Joined Cases P&O European Ferries (Vizcaya), SA (T-116/01) and Diputación Foral de Vizcaya (T-118/01) v Commission [2003] ECR II-02957, point 118.
Sklicevanje na sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje v združenih zadevah P&O European Ferries (Vizcaya), SA (T-116/01) in Diputación Foral de Vizcaya (T-118/01) proti Komisiji, Recueil 2003, str. II-02957, točka 118.
Reference is made to the Court judgments in cases C-83/1 P, C-93/1 P and C-64/01 P Chronopost and others v Ufex and others [2003] ECR I-06993, paragraphs 38 and 39.
Sklicevanje na sodbe Sodišča v zadevah C-83/1 P, C-93/1 P in C-64/01 P, Chronopost in drugi proti Ufex in drugim, Recueil 2003, str. I-06993, odstavka 38 in 39.
The Polish authorities did not maintain this argument in their comments.
Poljski organi v pripombah niso zagovarjali tega argumenta.
Comments submitted by BOT, ENS, ACZG, ECK, ELCHO, PAK and PSE.
Pripombe, ki so jih predložili BOT, ENS, ACZG, ECK, ELCHO, PAK in PSE.
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, and Oberbundesanwalt beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht [2003] ECR I-07747.
Zadeva C-280/00, Altmark Trans GmbH in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg proti Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, ob udeležbi Oberbundesanwalt beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht, Recueil 2003, str. I-07747.
Comments submitted by BOT, ENS, ECZG, ELCHO and the Banks.
Pripombe, ki so jih predložili BOT, ENS, ECZG, ELCHO in banke.
Judgment of the Court of 2 February 1988, joined cases 67, 68 and 70/85 Van der Kooy BV and others v Commission [1988] ECR 00219.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 2. februarja 1988, združene zadeve 67, 68 in 70/85, Van der Kooy BV in drugi proti Komisiji, Recueil 1988, str. 00219.
Comments submitted by BOT, ENS, ECK, ELCHO, the Banks and PAK.
Pripombe, ki so jih predložili BOT, ENS, ECK, ELCHO, banke in PAK.
Comments submitted by BOT, ENS, ELCHO and PAK.
Pripombe, ki so jih predložili BOT, ENS, ELCHO in PAK.
Comments submitted by ELCHO, PAK and PSE.
Pripombe, ki so jih predložili ELCHO, PAK in PSE.
Comments submitted by BOT, ENS, ELCHO, PAK and PSE.
Pripombe, ki so jih predložili BOT, ENS, ELCHO, PAK in PSE.
Comments submitted by ELCHO, the Banks and PAK.
Pripombe, ki so jih predložili ELCHO, banke in PAK.
Commission Decision of 3 February 2004 in state aid case PL 1/03 — Poland — Compensations of stranded costs in Poland.
Odločitev Komisije z dne 3. februarja 2004 v primeru državne pomoči PL 1/03 – Poljska – Nadomestila za nasedle stroške na Poljskem.
Letter C(2004) 167fin dated 3 February 2004.
Dopis C(2004) 167 konč. z dne 3. februarja 2004.
Comments submitted by Rzeszów and West LB AG London Branch
Pripombe, ki sta jih predložili družba Rzeszów in banka West LB AG London Branch.
Rzeszów failed to substantiate this argument in greater detail.
Družba Rzeszów ni podrobneje utemeljila tega argumenta.
However, in its additional comments, West LB AG London Branch (cf. footnote 11) states that; although the bill on the early termination of PPAs provides for PPAs to be terminated voluntarily, in practice the Act will make such termination mandatory.
Vendar pa banka West LB AG London Branch v dodatnih pripombah (prim. opombo 11) navaja, da bo Zakon določal obvezno prenehanje PNE, čeprav predlog zakona o predčasnem prenehanju PNE predvideva prostovoljno prekinitev PNE.
In addition, as a result of liquidation of the adjustment component of the system charges, PSE will no longer receive funds to discharge its obligations under the PPAs after the Act enters into force — which is likely to result in PSE having significant difficulties in discharging its obligations under the PPAs.
Poleg tega PSE zaradi odprave elementa prilagoditve sistemskih stroškov ne bo več prejemal sredstev za izpolnjevanje svojih obveznosti v skladu s PNE po začetku veljavnosti Zakona – zaradi česar bo imel PSE verjetno precejšnje težave pri izpolnjevanju svojih obveznosti v skladu s PNE.
Therefore, if power generators fail to terminate the contract voluntarily, the risk of not receiving the total amount of funding for contract implementation is greatly increased.
Če torej proizvajalci energije pogodbe ne prekinejo prostovoljno, se precej poveča tveganje, da ne prejmejo celotnega zneska sredstev za izvajanje pogodbe.
According to West LB AG London Branch, the way in which the compensation for stranded costs is calculated and paid practically deprives financial institutions of the source of repayment of loans negotiated under the PPAs.
Po trditvah banke West LB AG London Branch ostanejo finančne ustanove zaradi načina izračunavanja in izplačevanja nadomestila za nasedle stroške v praksi brez vira za vračilo posojil, dogovorjenih na podlagi PNE.
Financial institutions would be deprived of their rights without compensation.
Finančnim ustanovam bi bile brez nadomestila odvzete njihove pravice.
West LB argues that the bill should therefore — as a minimum — provide for sufficient compensation to ensure that financial institutions can obtain immediate repayment of all funding granted to power generators.
Banka West LB trdi, da bi moral predloga zakona zato – najmanj – predvideti zadostno nadomestilo, da se tako zagotovi, da lahko finančne ustanove prejmejo takojšnje povračilo vseh sredstev, dodeljenih proizvajalcem energije.
Judgment of the Court of 27 September 1988 in joined cases C-106 to 120/87 Asteris AE and others v Greece and European Economic Community [1988] ECR 05515, paragraphs 23 and 24.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 27. septembra 1988 v združenih zadevah C-106 to 120/87, Asteris AE in drugi proti Grčiji in Evropski gospodarski skupnosti, Recueil 1988, str. 05515, odstavka 23 in 24.
Case C-379/98 PreussenElektra AG v Schleswag AG [2001] ECR I-02099.
Zadeva C-379/98, PreussenElektra AG proti Schleswag AG, Recueil 2001, str. I-02099.
Judgment of the Court of 16 May 2002 in case C-482/99 France v Commission [2002] ECR I-04397.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 16. maja 2002 v zadevi C-482/99, Francija proti Komisiji, Recueil 2002, str. I-04397.
Electrabel's comments on the procedure, point 45, fourth sentence.
Pripomba družbe Electrabel o postopku, četrti stavek točke 45.
Green electricity may be a limited exception since some customers may be prepared to pay more for electricity which is certified to have been generated from renewable energy sources.
Električna energija iz obnovljivih virov je lahko omejena izjema, ker so nekateri odjemalci lahko pripravljeni plačati več za električno energijo, ki potrjeno izhaja iz obnovljivih energetskih virov.
However, none of the power plants benefiting from PPAs uses these energy sources.
Vendar pa nobena od elektrarn, ki izkoriščajo PNE, ne uporablja teh energetskih virov.
Source: Polish Power Exchange statistics.
Vir: Statistični podatki poljske borze električne energije.
Short-run marginal costs are the costs that power generators can avoid by choosing to stop generating electricity in the short term.
Kratkoročni mejni stroški so stroški, ki se jim proizvajalci energije lahko izognejo, če se odločijo za kratkoročno ustavitev proizvodnje električne energije.
These costs are more or less equal to variable costs, since both notions are primarily driven by fuel costs.
Ti stroški so približno enakovredni spremenljivim stroškom, ker so oboji odvisni predvsem od stroškov goriva.
ELCHO's comments on the procedure, paragraph 1.4.1, third sentence.
Pripombe družbe ELCHO o postopku, tretji stavek odstavka 1.4.1.
Source: URE.
Vir: URE.
The latest version of this Directive is Directive 2001/80/EC (see footnote 34).
Najnovejša različica te direktive je Direktiva 2001/80/ES (glej opombo 34).
The directive was adopted on 19 December 1996 and had been under discussion since the presentation by the Commission of its draft proposal on 14 March 1992.
Direktiva je bila sprejeta 19. decembra 1996, razprava o njej pa je potekala od 14. marca 1992, ko je Komisija predstavila osnutek predloga zanjo.
Joined cases C-328/99 and C-399/00 Italy and SIM 2 Multimedia v Commission [2003] ECR I-4035, paragraph 83.
Združeni zadevi C-328/99 in C-399/00, Italija in SIM 2 Multimedia proti Komisiji, Recueil 2003, str. I-4035, odstavek 83.
Judgment of the Court of 10 December 1991 in Case C-179/90 Merci convenzionali porto di Genova SpA v Siderurgica Gabrielli SpA [1991] ECR I-05889, paragraph 27.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 10. decembra 1991 v zadevi C-179/90, Merci convenzionali porto di Genova SpA proti Siderurgica Gabrielli SpA, Recueil 1991, str. I-05889, odstavek 27.
See Commission decisions in cases N 34/99 (OJ C 5, 8.1.2002, p. 2), NN 49/99 (OJ C 268, 22.9.2001, p. 7), N 6/A/01 (OJ C 77, 28.3.2002, p. 26) and C 7/05 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Glej odločitve Komisije v zadevah N 34/99 (UL C 5, 8.1.2002, str. 2), NN 49/99 (UL C 268, 22.9.2001, str. 7), N 6/A/01 (UL C 77, 28.3.2002, str. 26) in C 7/05 (še ni objavljena v Uradnem listu).
Journal of Laws 1997/54, item 348, as amended.
Uradni list 1997/54, točka 348, kakor je bila spremenjena.
These are actually the second and third criteria of the Altmark Judgement.
To sta dejansko drugo in tretje merilo iz sodbe Altmark.
Union for the Coordination of Transmission of Electricity, an association of transmission system operators cooperating within the interconnected network of continental Europe.
Zveza za koordinacijo prenosa električne energije je združenje upravljavcev prenosnih omrežij, ki sodelujejo v povezanem omrežju celinskega dela Evrope.
PSE's 2005 Annual Report, available at http://www.pse-operator.pl/uploads/kontener/Annual_Report_2005.pdf.
Letno poročilo PSE za leto 2005, na voljo na spletnem naslovu http://www.pse-operator.pl/uploads/kontener/Annual_Report_2005.pdf.
See, for example, Commission decision of 28 January 2004 state aid CZ 14/2003 — Czech Republic ‘Česka spořitelna, a.s.’.
Glej na primer odločitev Komisije z dne 28. januarja 2004, državna pomoč CZ 14/03 – Češka, „Česka spořitelna, a. s.“.
With which the PPA was signed on 26 August 1994, as indicated by BOT in its comments on the procedure.
Z njim je bila PNE podpisana 26. avgusta 1994, kot navaja BOT v svojih pripombah o postopku.
See footnote 16.
Glej opombo 16.
PL 1/03 — Stranded costs — Poland, cf. footnote 36.
PL 1/03 – Nasedli stroški – Poljska, prim. opombo 36.
An exception to this rule was provided for in point 4.16 of the Regional Guidelines, but only for outermost regions and regions of low population density, which excludes the regions in which the power generators benefiting from PPAs are located.
Izjema od tega pravila je bila predvidena v točki 4.16 regionalnih smernic, vendar samo za najbolj oddaljene regije in regije z nizko gostoto prebivalstva, kar izključuje regije, v katerih so proizvajalci energije, ki izkoriščajo PNE.
The Regional Guidelines are based on both Article 87(3)(a) and Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty.
Regionalne smernice temeljijo na členu 87(3)(a) in na členu 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES.
They provide for the same type of assessment for both Articles.
Predvidevajo enak način ocenjevanja za oba člena.
The difference in the application of these two Articles is linked to the areas where they apply and the admissible aid intensities.
Razlika pri uporabi teh dveh členov je povezana s področji, za katera se uporabljata, in sprejemljivo intenzivnostjo pomoči.
Point 4.8 of the Stranded Costs Methodology.
Točka 4.8 metodologije za nasedle stroške.
Letter from the Polish authorities of 6 June 2007.
Dopis poljskih organov z dne 6. junija 2007.
See for instance case N 161/04 — Portugal (OJ C 250, 8.10.2005, p. 9).
Glej na primer zadevo N 161/04 – Portugalska (UL C 250, 8.10.2005, str. 9).
See for instance the judgment of 2 July 1974 in case C-173/73 Italy v Commission [1974] ECR 709 and the judgment of 22 March 1977 in case C-78/76 Steinike & Weinlig v Germany [1977] ECR 595.
Glej na primer sodbo z dne 2. julija 1974 v zadevi C-173/73, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1974, str. 709, in sodbo z dne 22. marca 1977 v zadevi C-78/76, Steinike & Weinlig proti Nemčiji, Recueil 1977, str. 595.
See in particular case NN 49/99 — Stranded costs in Spain (OJ C 268, 22.9.2001, p. 7).
Glej zlasti zadevo NN 49/99 – Nasedli stroški v Španiji (UL C 268, 22.9.2001, str. 7).
State aid case N 133/2001 — Stranded costs in Greece (OJ C 9, 15.1. 2003, p. 6).
Primer državne pomoči N 133/01 – Nasedli stroški v Grčiji (UL C 9, 15.1.2003, str. 6).
Following a request by the Polish authorities dated 7 July 2006, registered on 12 July 2006, most of the comments were translated into Polish and transmitted to the Polish authorities by letter of 23 February 2007.
Po zahtevi poljskih organov z dne 7. julija 2006, evidentirani 12. julija 2006, je bila večina pripomb prevedena v poljščino in poslana poljskim organom z dopisom z dne 23. februarja 2007.
In reply to that letter, by letter dated 12 March 2007, registered on the same day, the Polish authorities informed the Commission that it was no longer necessary to translate the remaining comments.
Poljski organi so na ta dopis odgovorili z dopisom z dne 12. marca 2007, evidentiranim istega dne, v katerem so Komisijo obvestili, da preostalih pripomb ni več treba prevesti.