natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission continued its investigation with regard to Community interest aspects and carried out further analyses of information provided by importers, retailers and trade associations in the Community after the imposition of the provisional anti-dumping measures.
Komisija je nadaljevala preiskavo v zvezi z vidiki interesa Skupnosti in izvedla nadaljnjo analizo informacij, ki so jih po uvedbi začasnih protidampinških ukrepov predložili nekateri uvozniki, trgovci na drobno ter trgovinska združenja v Skupnosti.
The oral and written comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and, where appropriate, the provisional findings were modified accordingly.
Ustne in pisne pripombe, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane stranke, so bile obravnavane, začasne ugotovitve pa po potrebi ustrezno spremenjene.
To this end further verification visits were carried out at the following companies:
V ta namen so bili opravljeni nadaljnji preveritveni obiski v naslednjih družbah:
Unrelated importers in the Community:
nepovezana uvoznika v Skupnosti:
Koopman International BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Koopman International BV, Amsterdam, Nizozemska
Salco Group PLC, Essex, UK
Salco Group PLC, Essex, Združeno kraljestvo
Verification visits were also carried out at the premises of the companies mentioned in recital 31.
Opravljeni so bili tudi preveritveni obiski v prostorih družb iz uvodne izjave 31.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of definitive anti-dumping measures on imports of certain candles, tapers and the like originating in the PRC and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of the provisional duty.
Vse stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in razmislekih, na podlagi katerih je bilo predvideno, da se priporoči uvedba dokončnih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz nekaterih sveč, svečk in podobnega s poreklom iz LRK in dokončno pobiranje zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo.
They were also granted a period within which they could make representations subsequent to this disclosure.
Določeno je bilo tudi obdobje za predložitev njihovih stališč do tega razkritja.
It is recalled that the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2007 (‘investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Treba je spomniti, da je preiskava dampinga in škode zajemala obdobje od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2007 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
With respect to the trends relevant for the injury assessment, the Commission analysed data covering the period from 2004 to the end of the IP (period considered).
V zvezi z gibanji, pomembnimi za oceno škode, je Komisija analizirala podatke za obdobje od leta 2004 do konca OP („obravnavano obdobje“).
Some interested parties argued that the choice of the year 2007 as investigation period was flawed because certain events, such as changing export subsidy and labour policies of the PRC, and fluctuations in exchange rates, which took place in 2007 and 2008, played a role in the injury analysis.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so zatrjevale, da je bila izbira leta 2007 kot obdobja preiskave napačna, ker so nekateri dogodki, in sicer spremenjene izvozne subvencije in politike trga dela LRK ter nihanja v menjalnih tečajih v letih 2007 in 2008, vplivala na analizo škode.
It should be noted that according to Article 6(1) of the basic Regulation, the investigation period should cover a period immediately prior to the initiation of the proceeding.
Omeniti je treba, da mora obdobje preiskave v skladu s členom 6(1) osnovne uredbe zajemati obdobje neposredno pred začetkom postopka.
Consequently, the claim was rejected.
Zato je bila zahteva zavrnjena.
One interested party contested the percentage mentioned in recital 2 of the provisional Regulation which represents the complainants in terms of total Community production.
Ena zainteresirana stranka je izpodbijala odstotek iz uvodne izjave 2 začasne uredbe, ki kaže pritožnike glede na celotno proizvodnjo Skupnosti.
After examination of the claim, it should be noted that the figure of 60 % indicated in recital 2 of the provisional Regulation refers to the overall support for the investigation, including complainants and Community producers who supported the complaint and agreed to cooperate in the investigation, rather than to the percentage of the Community production covered by the complainants only.
Po proučitvi trditve je treba opozoriti, da se odstotek 60 % v uvodni izjavi 2 začasne uredbe nanaša na skupno podporo preiskavi, vključno s pritožniki in proizvajalci Skupnosti, ki so pritožbo podprli in so se strinjali s sodelovanjem v preiskavi, in ne na odstotek proizvodnje Skupnosti, ki zajema zgolj pritožnike.
This is confirmed by recital 92 of the provisional Regulation.
To je potrjeno v uvodni izjavi 92 začasne uredbe.
As to the percentage in recital 2 of the provisional Regulation, this should read ‘34 %’.
Zato se odstotek v uvodni izjavi 2 začasne uredbe mora glasiti „34 %“.
The product concerned was provisionally defined as certain candles, tapers and the like, other than memory lights and other outdoor burners, exported to the Community and originating in the PRC (‘candles’ or ‘product concerned’).
Zadevni izdelek je bil začasno opredeljen kot nekatere sveče, svečke in podobno, razen nagrobnih sveč in drugih zunanjih svetil na gorivo, izvožene v Skupnost in s poreklom iz LRK („sveče“ ali „zadevni izdelek“).
For the purpose of imposing provisional measures, although the various types of candles could differ in size, shape, colour, and other features such as scent, etc., it was considered that all the types of candles included in the definition of the product concerned share the same basic chemical and technical characteristics and uses and they would be to a large extent interchangeable.
Zaradi uvedbe začasnih ukrepov, čeprav se različne vrste sveč lahko razlikujejo po velikosti, obliki, barvi in drugem, kot je vonj itn., se je štelo, da imajo vse vrste sveč, ki jih zajema opredelitev zadevnega izdelka, enake osnovne kemijske in tehnične značilnosti in uporabe ter so večinoma zamenljive.
Comments made at that time by interested parties did not justify the exclusion of certain types of candles from the scope of the investigation, in particular the so-called ‘fancy’ or ‘decorative’ candles.
Takratne pripombe zainteresiranih strank niso opravičile izključitve nekaterih vrst sveč iz preiskave, zlasti t.i. „modnih“ ali „dekorativnih“ sveč.
The parties did not make any submission identifying dividing features which would have allowed to clearly distinguishing between the various types of candles which should be included and those which should be excluded from the scope of the investigation.
Stranke niso predložile informacij o lastnostih, s katerimi bi lahko jasno ločili različne vrste sveč, ki jih je treba vključiti v preiskavo, od tistih, ki jih je treba izključiti iz nje.
In addition, contrary to certain claims, the investigation did not point to findings of dumping and injury within the sampled companies investigated varying significantly according to the types of candles.
Poleg tega preiskava vzorčenih družb v nasprotju z nekaterimi trditvami ni privedla do ugotovitev o dampingu in škodi, ki bi se med seboj zelo razlikovale glede na vrste sveč.
It was therefore provisionally considered that all candle types covered by the present investigation were part of the same product and should be covered by the investigation.
Zato je bilo začasno sklenjeno, da vse vrste sveč, ki jih zajema sedanja preiskava, spadajo v isto skupino izdelkov in jih preiskava mora zajeti.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, it was claimed again that exporting producers in the PRC were producing to a large extent handmade or decorative candles with further refining operations.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov so znova predložili trditve, da proizvajalci izvozniki iz LRK pogosto proizvajajo ročno izdelane ali dekorativne sveče z dodatnimi postopki obdelave.
It was repeated that they were labour-intensive and that they were produced in limited quantities by Community producers.
Ponovno je bilo navedeno, da so delovno intenzivne in da so jih proizvajalci Skupnosti proizvedli v omejenih količinah.
It was also reiterated that the customer perception towards decorative candles was different compared to classical and standard types of candles.
Prav tako pa je bilo poudarjeno, da stranke drugače dojemajo dekorativne sveče v primerjavi s klasičnimi in standardnimi vrstami sveč.
For example, it was argued that unlike classical candles, decorative types are not destined to be burned or used to provide heat but were intended to be kept as decorative items as long as possible unaltered.
Trdilo se je na primer, da z razliko od klasičnih sveč dekorativne vrste niso namenjene izgorevanju ali ogrevanju, temveč naj bi se čim dlje hranile kot dekorativni predmeti v nespremenjenem stanju.
It was also claimed that it would be relatively easy to discern decorative candles from other types of candles, such as tea lights and tapered candles, taking into account that decorative candles have at least one of the following features: (i) are multicoloured and have multiple layers; (ii) have special shapes; (iii) have carved surface with decorations and (iv) have additional decorations of material other than wax/paraffin.
Pojavile so se tudi trditve, da bi bilo relativno lahko razlikovati dekorativne sveče od drugih vrst sveč, kot so čajne svečke in koničaste sveče, če se upošteva ena od naslednjih lastnosti dekorativnih sveč: (i) so večbarvne in večplastne, (ii) posebnih oblik, (iii) z obdelano površino in dekoracijami ter (iv) dodatnimi dekoracijami iz drugih materialov kot vosek/parafin.
Other interested parties claimed that ‘birthday’ candles are not manufactured in the Community but almost exclusively in the PRC and should therefore also be excluded from the present proceeding.
Druge zainteresirane stranke so trdile, da se „rojstnodnevne“ svečke ne proizvajajo v Skupnosti, ampak skoraj izključno v LRK, in bi jih bilo treba zato prav tako izključiti iz sedanjega postopka.
It was also argued that the so-called tea lights could replace candles for the purpose of producing light, but other types of candles could not replace tea lights for the purpose of producing heat.
Prav tako se je trdilo, da bi t.i. čajne svečke lahko nadomestile sveče za razsvetljevanje, vendar druge vrste sveč ne bi mogle nadomestiti čajnih svečk za ogrevanje.
Therefore these two product types would lack interchangeability as is the case between memory lights and other outdoor burners which are not part of the product concerned and other types of candles, including tea lights.
Zato ti dve vrsti izdelka naj ne bi bili zamenljivi kakor nagrobne sveče z drugimi zunanjimi svetili na gorivo, ki niso del zadevnega izdelka, ter druge vrste sveč, ki vključujejo čajne svečke.
Consequently it was claimed that tea lights should also be excluded from the present proceeding.
Posledično se je trdilo, da bi bilo treba čajne svečke prav tako izključiti iz sedanjega postopka.
Concerning the claim on decorative candles, the distinguishing features mentioned by the parties are very general and would not allow for a clear distinction to be made between the types of candles which should be included and those that should be excluded from the scope of the investigation and not made subject to measures.
V zvezi s trditvijo o dekorativnih svečah so razločevalne lastnosti, ki jih navajajo stranke, zelo splošne ter ne bi dopuščale jasnega razločevanja vseh vrst sveč, ki bi jih bilo treba vključiti v preiskavo in izključiti iz nje ter ne bi smele biti predmet ukrepov.
Many standard types of candles have more than one colour, they may have a specific shape or one or more additional decorations, for example on the occasion of specific celebrations during the year.
Mnoge standardne vrste sveč imajo več kot eno barvo, lahko so posebnih oblik ali jih krasi ena ali več dekoracij, na primer glede na priložnost posebnih praznovanj med letom.
In addition, the information provided by the parties and collected in the investigation, in particular on the product types and the product control numbers as they were defined, would not always allow for a clear distinction between the various types of candles based on the above-mentioned features.
Poleg tega informacije, ki so jih predložile stranke in so bile zbrane med preiskavo, zlasti o vrstah izdelka in številčnih oznakah izdelka, kakor so bile opredeljene, ne bi vedno dopuščale jasnega razločevanja med različnimi vrstami sveč na podlagi navedenih lastnosti.
It should be firstly noted that the fact that certain product types are, allegedly, not produced by Community producers would not automatically lead to the exclusion of these types from the definition of the product concerned.
Najprej je treba opozoriti, da samo zato, ker proizvajalci Skupnosti domnevno ne proizvajajo nekaterih vrst izdelka, te ne bodo samodejno izključene iz opredelitve zadevnega izdelka.
Secondly, it cannot be ruled out that certain types of candles are not produced by Community producers because of injurious dumping.
Drugič ni mogoče izključiti, da proizvajalci Skupnosti nekaterih vrst sveč ne proizvajajo zaradi škodljivega dampinga.
In the case of the so-called birthday candles, the parties concerned did not provide any evidence that these types of candles were actually not produced in the Community, nor did they explain the reasons why such candles would not be produced in the Community.
Za t.i. rojstnodnevne svečke zadevne stranke niso predložile dokazov, da te vrste svečk dejansko niso proizvedene v Skupnosti, niti niso pojasnile, zakaj takih svečk v Skupnosti ne bi proizvajali.
In addition, as is the case for the decorative candles, no clear dividing lines between the birthday candles and the other types of candles were provided to allow an eventual exclusion of these product types.
Poleg tega tako kot pri dekorativnih svečah niso predložile jasnih ločnic med rojstnodnevnimi svečkami in drugimi vrstami sveč, ki bi omogočile morebitno izključitev teh vrst izdelka.
These comments are also valid for the so-called handmade candles.
Te pripombe veljajo tudi za t.i. ročno izdelane sveče.
It is noteworthy that, as mentioned in recital 26, the claim that handmade candles are not produced in the Community was not correct.
Opozoriti je treba na nepravilno trditev, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 26, da se ročno izdelane sveče ne proizvajajo v Skupnosti.
Concerning the claim made on the use of certain candles types, namely to produce light and/or heat, it is recalled that in recital 26 of the provisional Regulation it was mentioned that interchangeability between various types of candles existed and that candles were largely used for interior decoration purposes and not for the main purpose of producing heat.
V zvezi s trditvijo o uporabi nekaterih vrst sveč zlasti za razsvetljevanje in/ali ogrevanje je treba spomniti, da je bila v uvodni izjavi 26 začasne uredbe navedena zamenljivost različnih vrst sveč ter da so bile sveče uporabljene predvsem kot notranji okras in ne zlasti za ogrevanje.
No information which would contradict this statement was provided by parties.
Stranke niso predložile informacij, ki bi bile v nasprotju s to izjavo.
Concerning the claims made on memory lights and outdoor candles, it is confirmed that these products can be distinguished from other types of candles on the basis of the technical and chemical criteria mentioned in recital 17 of the provisional Regulation.
V zvezi s trditvami o nagrobnih svečah in zunanjih svetilih na gorivo je potrjeno, da je možno te izdelke razlikovati od drugih vrst sveč na podlagi tehničnih in kemijskih meril iz uvodne izjave 17 začasne uredbe.
In summary, it was considered that the claims made by the parties were not sufficiently specific and were not supported by substantiating evidence showing that the product concerned was not correctly defined in the provisional Regulation.
Če povzamemo, se trditve strank ne zdijo dovolj natančne in niso podprte z utemeljenimi dokazi, da zadevni izdelek ni bil pravilno opredeljen v začasni uredbi.
It is recalled that all types of candles included in the product concerned share the same basic chemical and technical characteristics.
Spomniti je treba, da imajo vse vrste sveč, ki jih zajema zadevni izdelek, enake osnovne kemijske in tehnične značilnosti.
In addition, in the present case, it was found that candles had the same or similar uses and that they are in many instances interchangeable.
Poleg tega je bilo v tem primeru ugotovljeno, da so imele sveče enake ali podobne uporabe ter so večinoma zamenljive.
They are produced by candle producers in the PRC and exported via the same sales channels and are thus part of the same product.
Proizvajajo jih proizvajalci sveč v LRK in se izvažajo po istih prodajnih poteh, tako da spadajo v isto skupino izdelkov.
In the absence of any further comments concerning the definition of the product concerned, recitals 15 to 23 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nadaljnjih pripomb k opredelitvi zadevnega izdelka, se uvodne izjave 15 do 23 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Certain parties contested the findings made in recital 28 of the provisional Regulation where the criteria applied in the determination of the ‘like product’ were mainly based on the technical and chemical characteristics, as well as the end uses or functions of the product.
Nekatere stranke so izpodbijale ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 28 začasne uredbe, v katerih so merila, uporabljena za določitev „podobnega izdelka“, večinoma temeljila na tehničnih in kemijskih značilnostih ter končni uporabi ali funkcijah izdelka.
Other factors, such as the shape, scent, colour or other features stated by the interested party, were not considered to be relevant for the definition of the like product.
Drugi dejavnikih, kot so oblika, vonj, barva ali druge značilnosti, ki jih je navedla zainteresirana stranka, se niso zdeli ustrezni za opredelitev podobnega izdelka.
Indeed, possible variations in terms of size have no incidence on the definition of the product concerned and the like product, in particular because no clear distinction could be made between the product types belonging to the same product in relation to their main basic technical and chemical characteristics, to the end use and to the perception of the users.
Dejansko morebitne razlike glede velikosti ne vplivajo na opredelitev zadevnega izdelka in podobnega izdelka, zlasti ker ni mogoče najti jasnih razlik med vrstami izdelka, ki spadajo v isto skupino izdelkov, v zvezi z njihovimi glavnimi osnovnimi tehničnimi in kemijskimi značilnostmi, končno uporabo in zaznavanjem uporabnikov.
In this context, it should be underlined that the parties did not contest the fact that all types of candles share the same basic chemical and technical characteristics or that all types of candles are all made of the same raw material, mainly wax, that they are produced by the same producers and upon export they are sold via the same sales channels or to similar customers on the Community market.
V tej zvezi je treba poudariti, da stranke niso izpodbijale dejstva, da imajo vse vrste sveč enake osnovne kemijske in tehnične značilnosti ali so iz iste surovine, predvsem voska, da jih proizvaja isti proizvajalec in se ob izvozu prodajajo po istih prodajnih poteh ali podobnim strankam na trgu Skupnosti.
The main arguments made by interested parties relied on the fact that the types of candles produced in the PRC and exported to the Community are not like the types manufactured in the Community by Community producers.
Glavni argument zainteresiranih strank je slonel na dejstvu, da se vrste sveč, proizvedene v LRK in izvožene v Skupnost, razlikujejo od vrst, ki jih proizvajalci Skupnosti proizvajajo v Skupnosti.
All claims were carefully examined, but did not provide any new substantial element in comparison to the claims made and addressed at the provisional stage.
Vse trditve so bile skrbno proučene, vendar niso prinesle novih pomembnih elementov v primerjavi s trditvami, predloženimi v začasni fazi.
The claim stated in recital 14 for the definition of the product concerned was also made in the context of the like product.
Trditev iz uvodne izjave 14 v zvezi z opredelitvijo zadevnega izdelka je enaka trditvi v zvezi s podobnim izdelkom.
It was argued that exporting producers in the PRC produce to a large extent handmade, or labour-intensive decorative candles with further refining operations and various different shapes which are not produced or are produced in limited quantities by Community producers.
Po trditvah proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK pogosto proizvajajo ročno izdelane ali delovno intenzivne dekorativne sveče z dodatnimi postopki obdelave in različnih oblik, ki jih proizvajalci Skupnosti ne proizvajajo ali proizvajajo v omejenih količinah.
Hence, it was claimed that these types of candles are not like those produced by Community producers.
Torej te vrste sveč naj ne bi bile enake tistim, ki jih proizvajajo proizvajalci Skupnosti.
The investigation has shown that this statement is not correct.
Preiskava je pokazala, da ta trditev ne drži.
Whilst the producers included in the definition of the Community industry may be concentrating on the standard candles segment of the market, available information indicates that there are a large number of producers in the Community which produce decorative candles, including handmade and labour-intensive candles, in certain Member States such as Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Poland and Slovenia.
Čeprav se morda proizvajalci, vključeni v opredelitev industrije Skupnosti, osredotočajo na standardni segment trga sveč, pa dosegljive informacije kažejo, da je v Skupnosti v nekaterih državah, kot so Estonija, Francija, Grčija, Italija, Nemčija, Poljska in Slovenija, veliko proizvajalcev, ki proizvajajo dekorativne sveče, tudi ročno izdelane ter delovno intenzivne sveče.
In view of the claims made and the evidence provided by interested parties and all other information available from the investigation, it is considered that the product concerned and candles produced and sold by the exporting producers on their domestic market and by producers in the Community, which also served as an analogue country for the purpose of establishing the normal value with respect to the PRC, could be considered as like products in accordance with Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na trditve in dokaze, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane stranke, in vse druge dostopne informacije v preiskavi se kot podobni izdelki v skladu s členom 1(4) osnovne uredbe štejejo zadevni izdelek in sveče, ki jih proizvajajo in prodajajo proizvajalci izvozniki na notranjem trgu in proizvajalci v Skupnosti, ki se je uporabila tudi primerljiva država za določitev normalne vrednosti za LRK.
These products have essentially the same basic technical and chemical characteristics and the same or similar basic uses.
Ti izdelki imajo predvsem enake osnovne tehnične in kemijske značilnosti ter enako ali podobno osnovno uporabo.
Sampling of Community producers, importers and exporting producers in the PRC
Vzorčenje proizvajalcev Skupnosti, uvoznikov in proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK
In the absence of any comments concerning the sampling of Community producers, importers and exporting producers in the PRC, which would alter the provisional findings, recitals 31 to 40 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker k vzorčenju proizvajalcev Skupnosti, uvoznikov in proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK ni bilo pripomb, ki bi spremenile začasne ugotovitve, se uvodne izjave 31 do 40 začasne uredbe potrdijo.