natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Any amount received under insurance schemes and costs not incurred because of the disease must be deducted from the eligible cost and losses (Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006).
Kakršen koli znesek, prejet iz sistemov zavarovanj, in stroške, ki jih bolezen ni povzročila in ki bi sicer nastali, je treba odšteti od zneska stroškov ali izgube, upravičene do pomoči (člen 10(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1857/2006).
Payments must be made in relation to diseases or pests for which EU or national legislative or administrative provisions exist.
Plačila je treba izvršiti glede na bolezni živali, rastlin ali škodljivce, za katere obstajajo določbe Skupnosti ali nacionalne določbe, ki so določene v zakonih ali drugih predpisih.
Payments must thus be made as part of a public programme at EU, national or regional level for the prevention, control or eradication of the disease or pest concerned.
Zato morajo biti plačila izvršena kot del javnega programa na ravni Skupnosti, nacionalni ali regionalni ravni za preprečevanje, nadzor ali izkoreninjanje zadevne kužne bolezni, bolezni ali škodljivcev.
The diseases or pest infestation must be clearly identified in the programme, which must also contain a description of the measures concerned (Article 10(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006).
Kužna bolezen, bolezen ali napad škodljivcev morajo biti v programu jasno opredeljeni, kar mora vsebovati tudi opis zadevnih ukrepov (člen 10(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1857/2006).
The aid must not relate to disease in respect of which EU legislation provides for specific charges for control measures or that the cost of such measures is to be borne by the agricultural holding, unless the cost of such measures is entirely offset by compulsory charges on producers (Article 10(5) and (6) of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006).
Pomoč se ne sme nanašati na kužno bolezen, za katero zakonodaja Skupnosti predpisuje posebne dajatve za nadzorne ukrepe, ali na ukrepe, za katere zakonodaja Skupnosti določa, da stroški takšnih ukrepov bremenijo kmetijsko gospodarstvo, razen če se stroški takšnih ukrepov pomoči v celoti nadomestijo z obveznimi dajatvami proizvajalcev (člen 10(5) in (6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1857/2006).
As regards animal diseases, the aid must be granted in respect of diseases mentioned in the list of animal diseases established by the World Organisation for Animal Health and/or in the Annex to Council Decision 90/424/EEC of 26 June 1990 on expenditure in the veterinary field [15] (Article 10(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006).
Glede kužnih bolezni živali mora biti pomoč dodeljena za bolezni, omenjene na seznamu bolezni živali Mednarodnega urada za kužne bolezni žival in/ali v Prilogi k Odločbi Sveta 90/424/EGS [15] z dne 26. junija 1990 o odhodkih na področju veterine (člen 10(7) Uredbe (ES) št. 1857/2006).
The aid must be paid out within four years following the occurrence (Article 10(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006).
Pomoč mora biti plačana v štirih letih po nastanku (člen 10(8) Uredbe (ES) št. 1857/2006).
These conditions are met as follows:
Ti pogoji so izpolnjeni, kot sledi:
As described above in recital 14, the aid relates to a variety of measures (continuous monitoring, sampling and (laboratory/serial) analyses, veterinary advice, drawing up prevention and eradication plans and developing vaccination programmes), whose direct purpose is the prevention of diseases.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 14, pomoč zajema različne ukrepe (sprotno spremljanje, preiskave in (laboratorijske/sistematske) preglede, veterinarsko svetovanje, izdelavo načrtov za preprečevanje oziroma sanacijskih programov in razvoj programov cepljenja), katerih neposredni cilj je preprečevanje bolezni.
Germany confirmed by letter of 9 February 2009 that the aid is given in the form of subsidised services.
Nemčija je z dopisom z dne 9. februarja 2009 potrdila, da se pomoč izvaja v obliki subvencioniranih storitev.
Therefore aid for such costs can be authorised under Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006.
Posledično so pomoči za tovrstne stroške v skladu s členom 10(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1857/2006 dopustne.
Germany confirmed by letter of 9 February 2009 that where the projects concern animal diseases, these diseases are contained in the list established by the World Organisation for Animal Health and/or in the Annex to Council Decision 90/424/EEC.
Nemčija je z dopisom z dne 9. februarja 2009 potrdila, da so pri projektih, povezanih z kužnimi boleznimi živali, zadevne bolezni navedene na seznamu Mednarodnega urada za kužne bolezni živali in/ali v Prilogi k Odločbi Sveta 90/424/EGS.
Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 is not relevant as aid is granted for preventive measures only.
Člen 10(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1857/2006 ni upošteven, saj se dodeljujejo le pomoči za preventivne ukrepe.
Where specific ailments are concerned, the aid is given under a regional programme in which the diseases and/or illnesses and corresponding measures are clearly identified.
Pri plačilih, ki se nanašajo na določene bolezni, so pomoči del regionalnega programa, v katerem so jasno navedeni zadevna kužna bolezen oziroma bolezen in ustrezni ukrepi.
Article 10(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 is therefore satisfied.
Zahteve člena 10(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1857/2006 so torej izpolnjene.
Costs that the producers have to pay themselves under EU legislation are not eligible.
Stroški, ki v skladu z zakonodajo Unije bremenijo proizvajalce, niso subvencionirani.
Article 10(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 is therefore satisfied.
Zahteve člena 10(5) in (6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1857/2006 so torej izpolnjene.
Expenses incurred before the services are given are not eligible.
Stroški, nastali pred opravljanjem storitev, niso upravičeni do pomoči.
Article 10(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 is therefore satisfied.
Zahteve člena 10(8) Uredbe (ES) št. 1857/2006 so torej izpolnjene.
Germany has not excluded that the measures referred to in recital 14 may relate to other animal health aspects than specific and identified diseases, illnesses or pests, for instance to production hygiene.
Nemčija ni izključila možnosti, da bi bili ukrepi, navedeni v uvodni izjavi 14, lahko povezani tudi z drugimi vidiki dobrega počutja živali, kot so posebne in jasno navedene kužne bolezni, bolezni ali škodljivci (npr. higiena proizvodnje).
Hence measures would constitute aid for consultancy where the advice and plans are adapted to the situation of certain farmers or groups of farmers.
Temu primerno bi bili ukrepi svetovalne storitve, na podlagi katerih bi bili priporočila in načrti prilagojeni položaju določenih kmetov ali skupin kmetov.
Article 15(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 allows aid to cover the fees for consultancy services, provided by third parties, which do not constitute a continuous or periodic activity nor relate to the enterprise’s usual operating expenditure, such as routine tax consultancy services, regular legal services, or advertising.
V skladu s členom 15(2)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 1857/2006 se pomoči lahko odobrijo za pokritje svetovalnih storitev, ki jih opravijo tretje strani, honorarjev za storitve, ki ne spadajo med trajne ali občasne dejavnosti niti niso v zvezi z običajnimi operativnimi stroški podjetja, na primer rutinsko davčno svetovanje, redne pravne storitve ali oglaševanje.
Article 15(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 provides that the aid may cover up to 100 % of the eligible costs and must be given in the form of subsidised services.
V členu 15(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1857/2006 je predvideno, da lahko pomoč pokrije do 100 % tovrstnih stroškov, dodeli pa se v obliki subvencioniranih storitev.
It appears from the documentation submitted by Germany (see recital 14) that the subsidised consultancy services are in the form of projects that relate to specific one-off animal health issues of public interest.
Iz dokumentov, ki jih je predložila Nemčija (glej uvodno izjavo 14), izhaja, da so bile subvencionirane svetovalne storitve opravljene v obliki projektov, povezanih s posebnimi in točno določenimi vprašanji dobrega počutja živali v splošnem interesu.
Although certain measures may require continuous monitoring or testing, these appear to be linked to the particular project and not to represent routine ongoing veterinary or quality controls of the stock.
Čeprav bi bili za določene ukrepe nujno potrebni neprekinjeno spremljanje ali redni testi, se zdi, da se ti pripišejo projektu in ne pomenijo stalnega veterinarskega nadzora ali nadzora nad kakovostjo živalske populacije.
Neither can the cost of such measures be considered as usual operating expenditure within the meaning of Article 15(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006, as costs of routine visits for prevention and treatment by a veterinary specialist are not eligible for aid.
Stroškov takih ukrepov niti ni mogoče obravnavati kot običajne operativne stroške podjetja v smislu člena 15(2)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 1857/2006, saj stroški rutinskih obiskov veterinarjev, namenjeni preventivi ali zdravljenju, niso upravičeni do pomoči.
All aid is given in the form of subsidised services and limited to 100 % of the eligible costs.
Skupna pomoč se dodeli v obliki subvencioniranih storitev in lahko znaša največ 100 % dopustnih stroškov.
Aid granted in the fish farming sector
Pomoči, dodeljene v ribogojstvu
The measures have also been carried out in the fish farming sector.
Ukrepi so bili izvedeni tudi v ribogojstvu.
The Guidelines for the examination of State aid to fisheries and aquaculture from 1988, 1992, 1994, 1997 and 2001, which correspond to the Guidelines for agriculture, establish the following conditions for deeming State aids in the veterinary and health fields compatible with the internal market [16]: A public authority must combat a disease so as to ensure that action is taken in the common interest and not only in a particular interest.
V smernicah za preučitev državnih pomoči na področju ribištva in ribogojstva iz let 1988, 1992, 1994, 1997 in 2001, ki ustrezajo okvirni ureditvi, so določena naslednja merila za združljivost državnih pomoči s skupnim trgom na veterinarskem področju in področju zdravja [16]: organ mora proti bolezni ukrepati tako, da se zagotovi, da ravnanje ni le v nekem določenem interesu, temveč je v splošnem interesu.
The objectives of the aid measures must be either preventive or compensatory or both.
Ukrepi pomoči morajo biti namenjeni preprečevanju, imeti za cilj nadomestilo oziroma povezovati preprečevanje z nadomestilom.
The TGD was put in charge of the measures by the Land Bavaria and executes them on its own initiative, as stated in another context in recital 16.
Dežela Bavarska je službi TGD zaupala izvedbo ukrepov, TGD pa jih, kot je v nekem drugem okviru že navedeno v uvodni izjavi 16, samostojno izvaja.
The measures serve preventive objectives.
Ti ukrepi so namenjeni preprečevanju.
The State aids granted between 1 November 2004 and 31 March 2008 are assessed case-by-case in accordance with point 3.10 of the Guidelines for the examination of State aid to fisheries and aquaculture [17] (hereinafter 2004 Guidelines), which refers to Article 4 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1595/2004 [18], which in turn refers to Article 15(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999 of 17 December 1999 laying down the detailed rules and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries sector [19].
Državne pomoči, dodeljene med 1. novembrom 2004 in 31. marcem 2008, se posamično preverjajo v skladu s točko 3.10 Smernic za preučitev državnih pomoči na področju ribištva in ribogojstva [17] (v nadaljevanju: smernice iz leta 2004), ki se sklicujejo na člen 4 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1595/2004 [18], ta pa se dalje sklicuje na člen 15(3) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2792/1999 z dne 17. decembra 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil in sporazumov glede strukturne pomoči Skupnosti v ribiškem sektorju [19].
Examples of such operations are listed in Article 15(3)(e) and (l).
Primeri takih ukrepov so navedeni v členu 15(3)(e) in (l).
The Commission notes firstly that the purpose of the ‘general measures’ meets with the aims of those examples.
Prvič, Komisija meni, da je namen „splošnih ukrepov“ skladen s cilji teh primerov.
Secondly, the TGD carries out those activities on its own initiative and not at the farmers’ request.
Drugič, TGD izvaja te dejavnosti na lastno pobudo, in ne na zahtevo kmetov.
Moreover (see point 3.4 of the 2004 Guidelines), the farmers would not necessarily have taken the measures under pure market conditions.
Poleg tega ni nujno, da kmetje ukrepe izvajajo pod čisto tržnimi pogoji – glej točko 3.4 smernic iz leta 2004.
Finally, the measures also lea d to lasting improvements in the sector within the meaning of point 3.5 of the 2004 Guidelines.
In zadnjič, ti ukrepi tudi vodijo v trajne izboljšave za sektor v smislu točke 3.5 smernic iz leta 2004.
By letter of 9 February 2009, Germany confirmed that the aid is still paid in the agriculture sector and gave examples of typical projects.
Nemčija je z dopisom z dne 9. februarja 2009 potrdila, da se pomoči v kmetijstvu še vedno dodeljujejo, in navedla primere značilnih projektov.
These do not include projects in the fisheries sector.
Med njimi ni bilo nobenega iz ribiškega sektorja.
As it cannot be ruled out that aid may be granted for the aquaculture sector after 1 April 2008, it must be examined whether such aid would be compatible with the provisions applicable to the agriculture and fisheries sector after that date.
Ker pa ni izključeno, da bodo po 1. aprilu 2008 pomoči dodeljene sektorju ribogojstva, je treba preučiti, ali bi bile take pomoči združljive s predpisi, ki trenutno veljajo za kmetijstvo in ribištvo.
In connection with aid falling within the scope of other provisions, point 4.2 of the 2008 Guidelines refers to the respective conditions under those provisions, in this case under Commission Regulation (EC) No 736/2008 of 22 July 2008 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of fisheries products [21].
Točka 4.2 smernic iz leta 2008 se glede pomoči na področju veljavnosti drugih predpisov sklicuje na pogoje teh predpisov, v tem primeru na pogoje Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 736/2008 z dne 22. julija 2008 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe za državne pomoči malim in srednje velikim podjetjem, ki se ukvarjajo s proizvodnjo, predelavo in trženjem ribiških proizvodov [21].
The relevant provision for aid for veterinary measures is Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 736/2008.
V zvezi s pomočmi za veterinarske ukrepe je pomemben člen 14 Uredbe (ES) št. 736/2008.
This provides that aid for veterinary measures is compatible with the internal market provided it meets the conditions under Articles 28 and 32 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 [22] and Article 12 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 498/2007 [23].
V skladu z navedenim členom so pomoči za veterinarske ukrepe združljive s skupnim trgom, če izpolnjujejo pogoje členov 28 in 32 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1198/2006 [22] ter člena 12 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 498/2007 [23].
It follows from the above that the State aid granted to farmers under the measure under investigation meets the conditions set out in the relevant EU rules in the agriculture and fisheries sector.
V skladu z navedenim državne pomoči, dodeljene kmetom v okviru ukrepa, ki ga je Komisija preverila, izpolnjujejo pogoje, določene v veljavnih predpisih Unije za sektor kmetijstva in ribištva.
The Commission notes in this respect that neither the plaintiffs nor the other parties concerned have substantiated any infringement of the relevant EU provisions.
Komisija v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da niti pritožnik niti druge zainteresirane strani niso dokazali kršitve zadevnih predpisov.
Presence of aid to the TGD
Obstoj pomoči v korist službe TGD
To constitute a State aid, a measure must confer on recipients an advantage.
Če naj bi bil ukrep državna pomoč, mora ukrep prejemnikom zagotoviti prednost.
It is apparent from the case-law of the European Court of Justice that public service compensation does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU if it fulfils certain conditions [24].
Iz sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije izhaja, da nadomestilo za opravljanje javnih storitev ne pomeni pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU, kadar so izpolnjeni določeni pogoji.
However, if these conditions are not fulfilled but the general criteria for the applicability of Article 107(1) TFEU are nevertheless satisfied, such compensation constitutes State aid.
Če ti pogoji niso upoštevani, izpolnjena pa so splošna merila za uporabo člena 107(1) PDEU, je tako nadomestilo državna pomoč.
In the Altmark judgment, the Court laid down the conditions under which public service compensation does not constitute State aid as follows (principle 3):
Sodišče Evropske unije je v sodbi Altmark navedlo, pod katerimi pogoji nadomestilo za opravljanje javnih storitev ne pomeni državne pomoči (teza 3):
First, the recipient undertaking must actually have public service obligations to discharge, and the obligations must be clearly defined.
„Prvič, podjetje, ki prejema nadomestilo, mora dejansko izpolnjevati obveznosti javne službe, te obveznosti pa morajo biti jasno opredeljene.“
Second, the parameters on the basis of which the compensation is calculated must be established in advance in an objective and transparent manner […].
„Drugič, merila, na podlagi katerih se izračuna nadomestilo, morajo biti določena vnaprej ter objektivno in pregledno […]“
Third, the compensation cannot exceed what is necessary to cover all or part of the costs incurred in the discharge of public service obligations, taking into account the relevant receipts and a reasonable profit for discharging those obligations.
„Tretjič, nadomestilo ne sme presegati tistega, kar je potrebno za kritje vseh ali dela stroškov, ki so nastali z izpolnjevanjem obveznosti javne službe ob upoštevanju realiziranih prejemkov in razumnega dobička zaradi izpolnjevanja teh obveznosti.“
Fourth, where the undertaking which is to discharge public service obligations, in a specific case, is not chosen pursuant to a public procurement procedure which would allow for the selection of the tenderer capable of providing those services at the least cost to the community, the level of compensation needed must be determined on the basis of an analysis of the costs which a typical undertaking, well run and adequately provided with means […] so as to be able to meet the necessary public service requirements, would have incurred in discharging these obligations, taking into account the relevant receipts and a reasonable profit from discharging the obligations.’
„Četrtič, če podjetje, ki se mu naloži izpolnjevanje obveznosti javne službe, v konkretnem primeru ni izbrano s postopkom oddaje javnega naročila, ki omogoča, da se izbere tisti ponudnik, ki lahko te storitve opravlja z najnižjimi stroški za skupnost, se mora raven potrebnega nadomestila določiti na podlagi analize stroškov, ki bi jih povprečno, dobro vodeno podjetje, ki je ustrezno opremljeno […], zato da lahko zadosti zahtevam javne službe, imelo pri izpolnjevanju teh obveznosti ob upoštevanju realiziranih prejemkov in razumnega dobička zaradi izpolnjevanja teh obveznosti.“
Where these four criteria are met, public service compensation does not constitute State aid and Articles 107(1) and 108 TFEU do not apply.
Če so navedeni pogoji izpolnjeni, nadomestilo za opravljanje javnih storitev ni državna pomoč, tako da se člen 107(1) in člen 108 PDEU ne uporabita.
If the Member States do not respect these conditions and if the general criteria for the applicability of Article 107(1) TFEU are met, the public service compensation constitutes State aid, which must be notified to the Commission pursuant to Article 108(3) TFEU.
Če države članice ne spoštujejo teh pogojev in so izpolnjena splošna merila za uporabo člena 107(1) PDEU, nadomestilo za opravljanje javnih storitev pomeni državno pomoč, ki jo je v skladu s členom 108(3) PDEU treba priglasiti Komisiji.
When the procedure was opened, there was some doubt as to whether conditions (c) and (d), in particular, were met.
Pri sprožitvi postopka so obstajali dvomi predvsem o tem, ali so bili izpolnjeni pogoji iz točk (c) in (d).
Regarding condition (a), the Commission recalls that Article 14(1) LwFöG provides for a public service obligation in that it specifies a clear objective (healthy nutrition) and the means to reach it (high quality of foodstuffs) via a number of measures (see recital 14).
Glede pogoja iz točke (a) se Komisija sklicuje na dejstvo, da je v členu 14(1) LwFöG predvideno izpolnjevanje obveznosti javnih storitev, tako da so določeni jasen cilj (zdrava prehrana) in možnosti za dosego tega cilja z vrsto ukrepov (glej uvodno izjavo 14).
Under its statutes, the TGD promotes animal welfare for the safe production of animal-based food products and for the protection of both consumers and animals.
TGD si v skladu s statutom prizadeva spodbujati in zagotavljati dobro počutje živali, predvsem v interesu proizvodnje zdravstveno neoporečnih živil živalskega izvora ter varstva potrošnikov in živali.
To fulfil its aims, it uses its own staff and its own facilities.
Združenje ima za uresničitev tega namena lastno osebje in je samostojna ustanova.
The measures it takes are laid down in agreement No R1-4010/1393 of 1974 and framework agreement No T-7482-100 of 13 July 1993 between the Land of Bavaria and the TGD.
Ukrepi, ki jih izvaja TGD, so opredeljeni v sporazumu št. R1-4010/1393 iz leta 1974 in okvirnem sporazumu št. T-7482-100 z dne 13. julija 1993, ki sta bila sklenjena med deželo Bavarska in TGD Bayern.
The details are established every year in yearly agreements and administrative decisions.
Podrobnosti se vsako leto določajo z letnimi sporazumi in upravnimi odločbami.
Regarding condition (b), it should be noted that each of the individual activities was established in advance and that the financial compensation was calculated using a points system based on the anticipated time and costs.
Glede pogoja iz točke (b) je treba ugotoviti, da je bila vsaka posamezna dejavnost vnaprej opredeljena, nadomestilo pa obračunano s točkovnim sistemom na podlagi predvidljive porabe časa in stroškov.
This was also the case for new services added in subsequent years.
V naslednjih letih se je enako ravnalo z novo dodanimi storitvami.
It should be noted in this regard that the operations of the TGD have been audited and approved by the Bavarian High Court of Auditors (Bayerischer Oberster Rechnungshof).
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je vrhovno bavarsko računsko sodišče revidiralo in potrdilo dejavnost službe TGD.
The accounts have been also audited and approved by independent auditing companies for the period covered by this Decision.
Poleg tega so revizijo poročil za obdobje, ki ga pokriva obravnavani sklep, opravile neodvisne revizorske družbe.
Regarding condition (c), Germany has submitted data proving that the costs incurred in discharging the public service obligations have not been overcompensated (see annex).
Nemčija je glede pogoja iz točke (c) predložila informacije, iz katerih izhaja, da nadomestilo ni preseglo stroškov izpolnjevanja obveznosti javne službe (glej Prilogo).
Indeed, the data show that the TGD did not make a profit in the years 1990 to 2004.
Številke dejansko kažejo, da TGD v letih od 1990 do 2004 ni imela dobičkov.
The costs of the general measures are calculated using a point-based calculation, the points representing a certain value in euro.
Stroški splošnih ukrepov so bili ugotovljeni na podlagi točkovnega sistema, v skladu s katerim je ena točka ustrezala določeni vrednosti v evrih.
This calculation method is the outcome of an initiative of the Bavarian Court of Auditors.
Ta metoda izračunavanja je bila razvita na pobudo bavarskega računskega sodišča.
It is comparable to the method by which services in human medicine are calculated.
Primerljiva je z metodo za obračunavanje storitev humane medicine.
Germany has stated that the method used since 2002 fulfils the requirements of Commission Directive 2005/52/EC [25].
Nemčija je sporočila, da metoda izračunavanja, ki se uporablja od leta 2002, izpolnjuje zahteve Uredbe Komisije 2005/52/ES [25].