natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If a technological process has been developed by an individual, an application checked by the competent authority should be examined by EFSA before such authorisation is granted, in order to ensure that an assessment of the risk reduction potential of the process is carried out and that the rights of individuals, including the confidentiality of business information, is preserved.
Če je tehnološki postopek oblikoval posameznik, bi morala vlogo, ki jo je preveril pristojni organ, pred izdajo takšnega dovoljenja pregledati EFSA za zagotovitev, da je ocena možnega zmanjšanja tveganja postopka izvedena in da so ohranjene pravice posameznikov, vključno z zaupnostjo poslovnih informacij.
In order to provide advice to applicants a standard format for application should be adopted.
Treba bi bilo sprejeti standarden format za vlogo, da bi vložnikom zagotovili nasvete.
Since that document is intended only to be indicative it should be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure in collaboration with EFSA.
Ker pa je navedeni dokument samo okviren, ga bi bilo treba sprejeti v skladu s svetovalnim postopkom v sodelovanju z EFSA.
It is appropriate to clarify the requirements applicable to the placing on the market of animal by-products and derived products intended for feeding purposes and of organic fertilisers and soil improvers, so as to ensure the protection of the food and feed chain.
Primerno je, da se pojasnijo zahteve, ki se uporabljajo za dajanje na trg živalskih stranskih proizvodov in pridobljenih proizvodov, namenjenih za krmo ali organska gnojila ter sredstva za izboljšanje rodovitnosti tal, da se zagotovi varstvo prehranske in krmne verige.
Only Category 3 material should be used for feeding farmed animals other than fur animals.
Samo snovi kategorije 3 bi se smele uporabljati za krmo rejnih živali, ki niso kožuharji.
Fertilisers produced on the basis of animal by-products may affect the safety of the feed and food chain.
Gnojila, proizvedena iz živalskih stranskih proizvodov, lahko vplivajo na varnost krmne in prehranske verige.
Where they have been manufactured from meat-and-bone meal derived from Category 2 material or from processed animal protein, a component, such as an inorganic or an indigestible substance, should be added in order to prevent their direct use for feeding purposes.
Kadar so proizvedeni iz mesno-kostne moke iz snovi kategorije 2 ali iz predelanih živalskih beljakovin, bi bilo treba dodati komponento, kot je anorganska ali neprebavljiva snov, da se prepreči njihova neposredna uporaba za namene krmljenja.
Such mixing should not be required if the composition or packaging of products, in particular of products destined for use by the final consumer, prevents the misuse of the product for feeding purposes.
Takšnega mešanja se ne bi smelo zahtevati, če sta sestava ali pakiranje proizvodov, zlasti proizvodov, namenjenih končnim potrošnikom, takšna, da preprečujeta zlorabo proizvodov za namene krmljenja.
When determining the components, different circumstances regarding climate and soil and the objective for the use of particular fertilisers should be taken into account.
Pri določanju sestavin bi bilo treba upoštevati različne okoliščine v zvezi s podnebjem in zemljo ter cilj uporabe določenih gnojil.
Regulation (EC) No 1523/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007 banning the placing on the market and the import to, or export from, the Community of cat and dog fur, and products containing such fur [22] lays down a general prohibition on the placing on the market and the import and export of cat and dog fur and products containing such fur.
Uredba (ES) št. 1523/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. decembra 2007 o prepovedi dajanja v promet ter uvoza v Skupnost ali izvoza iz Skupnosti krzna mačk in psov ter izdelkov, ki vsebujejo tako krzno [22], določa splošno prepoved dajanja v promet ter uvoza in izvoza krzna mačk in psov ter izdelkov, ki vsebujejo takšno krzno.
However, that prohibition should not affect the obligation under this Regulation to dispose of animal by-products from cats and dogs, including fur.
Vendar ta prepoved ne bi smela vplivati na obveznost iz te uredbe, da je treba odstranjevati živalske stranske proizvode mačk in psov, vključno s krznom.
The promotion of science and research, and artistic activities may require the use of animal by-products or derived products of all categories, sometimes in quantities below the scale of commercial exchanges.
Spodbujanje znanosti, raziskav in umetniških dejavnosti lahko zahteva uporabo živalskih stranskih proizvodov ali pridobljenih proizvodov vseh kategorij, včasih v količinah, ki so manjše od tistih v trgovinski menjavi.
In order to facilitate the import and use of such animal by-products or derived products, the competent authority should be able to fix the conditions for such operations on a case-specific basis.
Za olajšanje uvoza in uporabe takšnih živalskih stranskih proizvodov ali pridobljenih proizvodov bi moral pristojni organ imeti možnost, da določi pogoje za takšne operacije na podlagi posameznega primera.
Harmonised conditions should be laid down where action at a Community level is necessary.
Kadar je potrebno ukrepanje na ravni Skupnosti, bi bilo treba določiti usklajene pogoje.
Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 contains detailed provisions which allow, by way of derogation, the feeding of Category 2 and Category 3 materials to zoo animals.
Uredba (ES) št. 1774/2002 vsebuje podrobne določbe, ki z odstopanjem dovoljujejo, da se s snovmi kategorije 2 in kategorije 3 krmi nekatere živali v živalskih vrtovih.
Similar provisions should be laid down in this Regulation and the feeding of certain Category 1 material should be allowed and complemented by the possibility to lay down detailed rules to control any possible risks arising to public or animal health.
Podobne določbe bi bilo treba določiti v tej uredbi in odobriti snovi kategorije 1 za hranjenje ter jih dopolniti z možnostjo določitve podrobnih pravil za nadzor vseh možnih tveganj za javno zdravje in zdravje živali.
Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 allows for the feeding of Category 1 material to endangered or protected species of necrophagous birds and other species living in their natural habitat, for the promotion of biodiversity.
Uredba (ES) št. 1774/2002 dovoljuje snovi kategorije 1 za hranjenje ogroženih ali zaščitenih ptic iz vrst mrhovinarjev ali drugih vrst v njihovem naravnem habitatu za spodbujanje biotske raznovrstnosti.
In order to provide an adequate tool for the preservation of those species, that feeding practice should continue to be permitted under this Regulation, in accordance with conditions laid down to prevent the spread of diseases.
Da bi zagotovili ustrezen način za ohranitev teh vrst, bi bilo treba to prakso hranjenja dovoliti še naprej v okviru te uredbe v skladu s pogoji, določenimi za preprečevanje širjenja bolezni.
At the same time, health conditions should be laid down in the implementing measures permitting the use of such Category 1 material for feeding purposes in extensive grazing systems and for feeding to other carnivore species, such as bears and wolves.
Hkrati bi bilo treba v izvedbenih ukrepih določiti pogoje za zdravje, ki dovoljujejo uporabo takšnih snovi kategorije 1 za hranjenje v obsežnih sistemih za pašo in za hranjenje drugih mesojedih vrst, kot so medvedi in volkovi.
It is important that such health conditions take into account the natural consumption patterns of the species concerned as well as Community objectives for the promotion of biodiversity as referred to in the Communication from the Commission of 22 May 2006 entitled ‘Halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010 – and beyond’.
Pomembno je, da ti pogoji za zdravje upoštevajo naravne prehranjevalne vzorce teh vrst kot tudi cilje Skupnosti za spodbujanje biotske raznovrstnosti, kot je omenjeno v sporočilu Komisije z dne 22. maja 2006 z naslovom „Omejitev upada biološke raznovrstnosti do leta 2010 in v obdobju po njem“.
Burial and burning of animal by-products, in particular of dead animals may be justified in specific situations, in particular in remote areas, or in disease control situations requiring the emergency disposal of the animals killed as a measure to control an outbreak of a serious transmissible disease.
Zakopavanje in sežiganje živalskih stranskih proizvodov, zlasti mrtvih živali, se lahko upraviči v posebnih okoliščinah, zlasti v oddaljenih območjih ali v razmerah obvladovanja bolezni, ki zahtevajo nujno odstranitev živali, ubitih v okviru ukrepa za obvladovanje izbruha nevarne prenosljive bolezni.
In particular, disposal on site should be allowed under special circumstances, since the available rendering or incinerator capacity within a region or a Member State could otherwise be a limiting factor in the control of a disease.
Zlasti bi bilo treba odobriti odstranjevanje na mestu samem pod posebnimi pogoji, ker v posamezni regiji ali državi članici ni kafilerije ali sežigalnice, lahko to pomeni omejitev možnosti obvladovanja bolezni.
The current derogation concerning burial and burning of animal by-products should be extended to areas where access is not practically possible or presents a risk to the health and safety of the collection personnel.
Sedanje odstopanje v zvezi z zakopavanjem in sežiganjem živalskih stranskih proizvodov bi bilo treba razširiti na območja, do katerih je dostop skoraj nemogoč ali pomeni tveganje za zdravje in varnost osebja, ki takšne proizvode zbira.
Experience gained with the application of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 and with natural disasters such as forest fires and floods in certain Member States has shown that under such exceptional circumstances, disposal by burial or burning on site can be justified so as to ensure the swift disposal of animals and to avoid the propagation of disease risks.
Izkušnje, pridobljene pri uporabi Uredbe (ES) št. 1774/2002 in na podlagi naravnih nesreč, kot so gozdni požari in poplave v določenih državah članicah, so pokazale, da je odstranitev z zakopavanjem ali sežiganjem na kraju samem v takšnih izrednih razmerah lahko upravičeno, da se zagotovi hitra odstranitev živali in preprečitev širjenja nevarnosti bolezni.
The overall size of remote areas in a Member State should be limited, on the basis of the experience gained with the application of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 so as to ensure that the general obligation to have in place a proper disposal system which complies with the rules laid down in this Regulation is fulfilled.
Celoten obseg oddaljenih območij v posamezni državi članici bi bilo treba omejiti na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih z uporabo Uredbe (ES) št. 999/2001, tako da se zagotovi upoštevanje splošne obveznosti razpolaganja na kraju samem z ustreznim sistemom za odstranjevanje, ki je v skladu s pravili iz te uredbe.
Certain establishments or plants which handle only small quantities of animal by-products which do not pose a risk to public and animal health should be allowed to dispose of such by-products by means other than disposal in accordance with this Regulation, under official supervision.
Določenim obratom, ki ravnajo samo z majhnimi količinami živalskih stranskih proizvodov, ki ne pomenijo tveganja za javno zdravje in zdravje živali, bi bilo treba dovoliti, da takšne živalske stranske proizvode pod uradnim nadzorom odstranjujejo na druge načine, ki niso odstranjevanje v skladu s to uredbo.
However, the criteria for such exceptional circumstances should be laid down at Community level, so as to ensure their uniform application, based on the actual situation of certain sectors and the availability of other disposal systems in certain Member States.
Vendar pa bi bilo treba merila za takšne izjemne okoliščine določiti na ravni Skupnosti, da se zagotovi njihova enotna uporaba na podlagi dejanskega stanja določenih sektorjev in razpoložljivosti drugih sistemov za odstranjevanje v določenih državah članicah.
The possible courses of action which the competent authority can take when carrying out official controls should be specified in order to ensure legal certainty, in particular regarding the suspension or permanent prohibition of operations or the imposition of conditions to ensure the proper application of this Regulation.
Za zagotovitev pravne varnosti bi bilo treba natančno določiti možne ukrepe, ki jih pristojni organ lahko sprejme pri izvajanju uradnega nadzora, zlasti glede začasne ali dokončne prepovedi delovanja ali izvajanja pogojev za zagotovitev ustrezne uporabe te uredbe.
These official controls should be carried out in the framework of multi-annual control plans under Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules [23].
Ta uradni nadzor bi bilo treba izvajati v okviru večletnih načrtov za nadzor v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 882/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o izvajanju uradnega nadzora, da se zagotovi preverjanje skladnosti z zakonodajo o krmi in živilih ter s pravili o zdravstvenem varstvu živali in zaščiti živali [23].
In order to ensure that Member States may control the quantity of material which is introduced for disposal into their territory, the competent authority should authorise the receipt of such material to its territory.
Za zagotovitev, da lahko država članica nadzoruje količino snovi, ki je za odstranjevanje vnesena na njeno ozemlje, bi moral pristojni organ dovoliti prejem takšnih snovi na njeno ozemlje.
Pressure sterilisation and auxiliary transport conditions may be imposed so as to ensure the control of possible risks.
Za zagotovitev obvladovanja možnih tveganj se lahko določita sterilizacija pod pritiskom ali dodatni prevozni pogoji.
In order to ensure traceability and cooperation between the competent authorities of Member States controlling the dispatch of animal by-products or derived products, the Traces system introduced by Commission Decision 2004/292/EC [24] should be used to provide information on the dispatch of Category 1 and Category 2 materials and meat-and-bone meal or animal fat derived from Category 1 and Category 2 materials, and processed animal protein derived from Category 3 material.
Za zagotovitev sledljivosti in sodelovanja med pristojnimi organi držav članic, ki nadzirajo odpremo živalskih stranskih proizvodov ali iz njih pridobljenih proizvodov, bi bilo treba uporabljati sistem Traces, uveden z Odločbo Komisije 2004/292/ES [24] za zagotovitev informacij o odpremah snovi kategorije 1 in kategorije 2, mesno-kostne moke ali živalske maščobe, pridobljenih iz snovi kategorije 1 in kategorije 2, in predelanih živalskih beljakovin, pridobljenih iz snovi kategorije 3.
For materials typically sent in small quantities for research, educational, artistic or diagnostic use, special conditions should be laid down to facilitate the movement of such materials within the Community.
Za snovi, ki so običajno poslane v manjših količinah za raziskovalne, izobraževalne, umetniške ali diagnostične namene, bi bilo treba določiti posebne pogoje za lažji premik teh snovi znotraj Skupnosti.
Bilateral arrangements facilitating the control of materials moved between the Member States sharing a common border should be permitted under special circumstances.
Dvostranske sporazume za poenostavljanje nadzora snovi, ki se prenašajo med državami članicami, ki si delijo skupno mejo, bi bilo treba dovoliti v posebnih okoliščinah.
In order to facilitate the transport of consignments through third countries neighbouring more than one Member State, a special regime for the dispatch of consignments from the territory of one Member State to another through the territory of a third country should be introduced in order to ensure, in particular, that consignments re-entering Community territory are subject to veterinary checks in accordance with Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market [25].
Za olajšanje prevoza pošiljk prek tretjih držav, ki mejijo na več kot eno državo članico, bi bilo treba uvesti posebno ureditev odpremljanja pošiljk z ozemlja ene države članice v drugo prek ozemlja tretje države, zlasti za zagotovitev, da so pošiljke ob ponovnem vstopu na ozemlje Skupnosti veterinarsko pregledane v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 89/662/EGS z dne 11. decembra 1989 o veterinarskih pregledih v trgovini znotraj Skupnosti glede na vzpostavitev notranjega trga [25].
For the sake of coherence of Community legislation, it is necessary to clarify the relationship between the rules laid down in this Regulation and Community legislation on waste.
Zaradi skladnosti zakonodaje Skupnosti je treba pojasniti odnos med pravili iz te uredbe in zakonodajo Skupnosti glede odpadkov.
In particular, consistency should be ensured with the prohibitions on waste exports laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 on shipments of waste [26].
Zlasti bi bilo treba zagotoviti skladnost s prepovedmi izvoza odpadkov iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1013/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 14. junija 2006 o pošiljkah odpadkov [26].
In order to prevent potentially detrimental effects for the environment, the export of animal by-products and derived products destined for disposal by incineration and by landfill should be prohibited.
Za preprečitev možnih škodljivih posledic za okolje bi bilo treba prepovedati izvoz živalskih stranskih proizvodov in iz njih pridobljenih proizvodov, namenjenih za odstranjevanje s sežiganjem in odlaganjem na odlagališčih.
The export of animal by-products and derived products should also be prevented where the objective is to use them in a biogas or composting plant to third countries which are not members of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), in order to prevent potentially adverse environmental impacts and risks to public and animal health.
Izvoz živalskih stranskih proizvodov in pridobljenih proizvodov bi bilo treba tudi preprečiti, kadar so namenjeni za uporabo v objektih za pridobivanje bioplina ali kompostiranje v tretjih državah, ki niso članice Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj (OECD), da se preprečijo možni škodljivi vplivi na okolje in tveganja za javno zdravje in zdravje živali.
When applying the provisions to derogate from the export ban, the Commission is obliged to fully respect in its decisions the Basel Convention on the control of transboundary movements of hazardous waste and their disposal, as concluded, on behalf of the Community, by Council Decision 93/98/EEC [27], and the amendment to this Convention laid down in Decision III/1 of the Conference of the Parties, as approved, on behalf of the Community, by Council Decision 97/640/EC [28], and implemented by Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006.
Pri uporabi določb za odstopanje od prepovedi izvoza bi morala Komisija v svojih sklepih v celoti upoštevati Baselsko konvencijo o nadzoru prehoda nevarnih odpadkov preko meja in njihovega odstranjevanja, kot je sklenila Skupnost v Sklepu Sveta 93/98/EGS [27] ter spremembo te konvencije v Odločbi III/1 konference pogodbenic, kakor ju je odobrila Skupnost s Sklepom Sveta 97/640/ES [28] ter izvedla z Uredbo (ES) št. 1013/2006.
In addition, it should be ensured that animal by-products mixed or contaminated with hazardous waste, as listed in Commission Decision 2000/532/EC of 3 May 2000 replacing Decision 94/3/EC establishing a list of wastes pursuant to Article 1(a) of Council Directive 75/442/EEC on waste and Council Decision 94/904/EC establishing a list of hazardous waste pursuant to Article 1(4) of Council Directive 91/689/EEC on hazardous waste [29] are only imported, exported or dispatched between Member States in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da so živalski stranski proizvodi, mešani ali kontaminirani z nevarnimi odpadki, kakor so navedeni v Odločbi Komisije 2000/532/ES z dne 3. maja 2000 o nadomestitvi Odločbe 94/3/ES o oblikovanju seznama odpadkov skladno s členom 1(a) Direktive Sveta 75/442/EGS o odpadkih in Odločbe Sveta 94/904/ES o oblikovanju seznama nevarnih odpadkov skladno s členom 1(4) Direktive Sveta 91/689/EGS o nevarnih odpadkih [29], uvoženi, izvoženi ali odpremljeni samo med državami članicami v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1013/2006.
It is also necessary to lay down rules concerning the dispatch of such material within a Member State.
Poleg tega je treba tudi določiti pravila o odpremah takšnih snovi znotraj države članice.
The Commission should be able to carry out controls in Member States.
Komisiji bi moralo biti omogočeno izvajanje nadzora v državah članicah.
Community controls in third countries should be carried out in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 882/2004.
Nadzor Skupnosti v tretjih državah bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 882/2004.
The import of animal by-products and derived products into the Community and the transit of such material should take place in accordance with rules which are at least as strict as those applicable within the Community.
Uvoz živalskih stranskih proizvodov in pridobljenih proizvodov v Skupnost ter tranzit takšnih snovi bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu s pravili, ki so vsaj tako stroga kot tista, ki veljajo znotraj Skupnosti.
Alternatively, the rules applicable to animal by-products and derived products in third countries may be recognised to be equivalent to the rules laid down in Community legislation.
Druga možnost je, da se pravila, ki veljajo za živalske stranske proizvode in pridobljene proizvode v tretjih državah, lahko priznajo kot enakovredna pravilom iz zakonodaje Skupnosti.
Due to the potential risk arising from them, a simplified set of import rules should be applicable to products which are destined for uses outside the feed chain.
Za proizvode, ki so namenjeni za uporabo zunaj krmne verige, bi se moral uporabljati poenostavljen sklop pravil za uvoz zaradi možnega tveganja, ki ga povzročajo.
Community legislation on the manufacture of derived products intended for use as cosmetic products, medicinal products or medical devices comprises a comprehensive framework for the placing on the market of such products: Council Directive 76/768/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products [30], Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use [31], Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products [32], Council Directive 90/385/EEC of 20 June 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable medical devices [33], Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices [34] and Directive 98/79/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 1998 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices [35] (the specific Directives).
Zakonodaja Skupnosti o izdelavi pridobljenih proizvodov, namenjenih za uporabo kot kozmetični izdelki, zdravila ali medicinski pripomočki, vsebuje celovit okvir za dajanje takšnih proizvodov na trg: Direktiva Sveta 76/768/EGS z dne 27. julija 1976 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic v zvezi s kozmetičnimi izdelki [30], Direktiva 2001/83/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. novembra 2001 o zakoniku Skupnosti o zdravilih za uporabo v humani medicini [31], Direktiva 2001/82/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. novembra 2001 o zakoniku Skupnosti o zdravilih za uporabo v veterinarski medicini [32], Direktiva Sveta 90/385/EGS z dne 20. junija 1990 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o aktivnih medicinskih pripomočkih za vsaditev [33], Direktiva Sveta 93/42/EGS z dne 14. junija 1993 o medicinskih pripomočkih [34] in Direktiva 98/79/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. oktobra 1998 o in vitro diagnostičnih medicinskih pripomočkih [35] („posebne direktive“).