natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission can therefore accept the measures as being necessary for the process of the successful restructuring.
Komisija lahko zato ukrepe sprejme kot potrebne za proces uspešnega prestrukturiranja.
The Polish authorities were also asked to assure the Commission that the restructuring aid to HSW, if approved by the Commission, would not have spillover effects on HSW — Zakład Zespołów Mechanicznych.
Poljski organi so bili pozvani, naj Komisiji zagotovijo dokaze, da pomoč za prestrukturiranje za družbo HSW, če bi jo Komisija odobrila, ne bi imela učinkov prelitja na podjetje HSW–Zakład Zespołów Mechanicznych.
The Polish authorities have assured the Commission that bilateral relations between HSW — Zakład Zespołów Mechanicznych and HSW are based on market terms (including terms of payment and of delivery) and that the companies, as distinct legal entities, keep separate accounts.
Poljski organi so zagotovili Komisiji, da temeljijo dvostranski odnosi med podjetjem HSW–Zakład Zespołów Mechanicznych in družbo HSW na tržnih pogojih (vključno s pogoji plačila in dobave) ter da imata družbi kot samostojni pravni osebi vsaka svoje računovodstvo.
HSW’s sole consideration when choosing HSW — Zakład Zespołów Mechanicznych as a partner for supplying materials was its geographical proximity.
Družba HSW si je za dobavitelja izbrala podjetje HSW–Zakład Zespołów Mechanicznych le zaradi geografske bližine.
In its decision of 23 November 2005 initiating the formal investigation procedure, the Commission raised doubts as to whether the separation between subsidised special military production (cannon) and civil production of construction machinery was sufficient to prevent cross-subsidisation between these two fields of activity.
Komisija je v svoji odločitvi z dne 23. novembra 2005 o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave izrazila dvome, da subvencionirana posebna vojaška proizvodnja (topovi) in civilna proizvodnja gradbenih strojev nista bili zadostno ločeni, zato da bi se preprečilo navzkrižno subvencioniranje med tema dvema področjema dejavnosti.
The Polish authorities have provided information assuring the Commission that the current cost-accounting system permits the clear separation of costs for the two types of activities mentioned above.
Poljski organi so Komisiji predložili podatke, ki potrjujejo, da omogoča sedanji sistem stroškovnega računovodstva jasno ločevanje med stroški teh dveh vrst dejavnosti.
The Commission concludes that the State aid in this case, some of which was granted in breach of the conditions laid down in Article 88(3) of the Treaty, is nevertheless compatible with the common market,
Komisija sklepa, da je v tem primeru državna pomoč, katere del je bil dodeljen v nasprotju s pogoji iz člena 88(3) Pogodbe, kljub temu združljiva s skupnim trgom –
The Decision of the Commission of 20 December 2006 on State aid C44/05 (ex NN 79/05, ex N 439/04) is revoked.
Odločba Komisije z dne 20. decembra 2006 o državni pomoči C 44/2005 (ex NN 79/05, ex N 439/04) se razveljavi.
The State aid in the sum of PLN 66,377 million granted or to be granted in favour of Huta Stalowa Wola SA, some of which was granted in breach of the conditions laid down in Article 88(3) of the Treaty, is compatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč v znesku 66,377 milijona PLN, ki se dodeli ali se bo dodelila podjetju Huta Stalowa Wola S.A. in katere del je bil dodeljen v nasprotju s pogoji iz člena 88(3) Pogodbe, je združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The aid granted to Huta Stalowa Wola SA in the form of a debt-to-equity swap in respect of loans totalling PLN 75 million is also compatible with the common market.
Pomoč, dodeljena podjetju Huta Stalowa Wola S.A. v obliki konverzije dolga v lastniški delež v zvezi s posojili v skupnem znesku 75 milijonov PLN, je prav tako združljiva s skupnim trgom.
OJ L 112, 30.4.2007, p. 67.
UL L 112, 30.4.2007, str. 67.
All amounts provided by the Polish authorities in Polish zloty (PLN) have been converted into euro (EUR) by using the exchange rate of 15 January 2008 of EUR 1 = PLN 4,22.
Vsi zneski, ki so jih poljski organi predložili v poljskih zlotih (PLN), so pretvorjeni v eure (EUR) na podlagi menjalnega tečaja z dne 15. januarja 2008, po katerem je 1 EUR = 4,22 PLN.
It was transmitted to Poland’s competition office (OCCP) on 13 December 2006.
Poljskemu uradu za varstvo konkurence (OCCP) je bil poslan 13. decembra 2006.
OJ C 298, 11.12.2007, p. 10.
UL C 298, 11.12.2007, str. 10.
I.e. the interest accrued on the loans so far and the interest to be accrued in the future until the original date set for the repayment of the loans.
Tj. do zdaj obračunane obresti v zvezi z dolgovoma in obresti, ki se bodo obračunavale do prvotnega datuma, določenega za povrnitev dolgov.
The amount of interest is lower by PLN 1,7 million than presented in the opening decision.
Znesek obresti je za 1,7 milijona PLN manjši od zneska, navedenega v uvodni odločbi.
Poland explained that since the debt-to-equity swap was implemented slightly later than the date originally planned, HSW repaid a higher amount of interest due and the part remaining to be repaid is hence smaller.
Poljska je pojasnila, da je družba HSW zaradi nekoliko poznejše izvedbe konverzije dolga v lastniški delež od prvotno načrtovane povrnila večji znesek zapadlih obresti in je zato znesek za povračilo manjši.
Information covered by professional secrecy.
Podatki so poklicna tajnost.
Compared to PLN 450 million as indicated in the February restructuring plan and PLN 456,9 million in the November plan.
V primerjavi s 450 milijoni PLN, kot je navedeno v februarskem načrtu prestrukturiranja, in 456,9 milijona PLN iz novembrskega načrta.
Poland refers to data provided by the consultancy Off Highway Research.
Poljska navaja podatke, ki jih je zagotovila svetovalna družba Off Highway Research.
This measure was the subject of the debt-to-equity swap implemented in July 2007 and will therefore also be considered in Table 4.
Ta ukrep je zadeval konverzijo dolga v lastniški delež, izvedeno julija 2007, in bo zato upoštevan tudi v tabeli 4.
Ibidem.
Prav tam.
The Polish authorities did not provide information on the aid equivalent of the measure.
Poljski organi niso zagotovili podatkov o protivrednosti ukrepa v obliki pomoči.
This aid amount was calculated assuming that 30,84 % of the liabilities restructured under the amended Act of 30 October 2002 on State aid for enterprises of special significance for the labour market would be paid back to the creditors from the proceeds obtained from the sale of the beneficiary’s assets, in the procedure provided for in that legislation.
Ta znesek pomoči se je izračunal ob predpostavki, da bi se 30,84 % obveznosti, prestrukturiranih na podlagi spremenjenega Zakona z dne 30. oktobra 2002 o državni pomoči za podjetja, ki so posebno pomembna za trg dela, povrnilo upnikom iz prihodka, ki bi ga pridobili s prodajo sredstev upravičenki po postopku iz navedenega zakona.
The aid equivalent is 100 % of the liabilities written off.
Protivrednost pomoči je 100 % odpisanih obveznosti.
Granted in 2005.
Dodeljena leta 2005.
See Case T-109/01 Fleuren Compost v Commission [2004] ECR II-127, para. 74.
Glej zadevo T-109/01, Fleuren Compost proti Komisiji, Recueil 2004, str. II-127, točka 74.
The amount of PLN 147 million includes the loans granted to HSW by the ARP before accession amounting to PLN 75 million.
Znesek 147 milijonov PLN vključuje posojili, ki ju je ARP odobrila HSW pred pristopom in znašajo 75 milijonov PLN.
These two loans were in 2007 converted into equity and are, thus, also featured as a debt-to-equity swap in Table 4.
Ti posojili sta se leta 2007 pretvorili v lastniški delež in se tako v tabeli 4 prikazujeta kot zamenjava terjatev v lastniške deleže.
See cases C 30/98 Wildauer Kubelwelle, Lautex Weberei und Veredlung (OJ C 387, 12.12.1998).
Glej zadevi C 30/98 Wildauer Kubelwelle, Lautex Weberei in Veredlung (UL C 387, 12.12.1998).
These loans appear as measures 8 and 15 in Table 2.
Posojili sta ukrepa 8 in 15 iz tabele 2.
Case T-11/95 BP Chemicals v Commission [1998] ECR II-3235.
Zadeva T-11/95 BP Chemicals proti Komisiji, Recueil 1998, str. II-3235.
See in particular points 85 et seq. of the initial opening decision.
Glej zlasti točko 85 in nasl. točke prvotne uvodne odločbe.
As explained in footnote 18, these amounts should also be reduced slightly as the overall additional cash is equal to 96,2 million.
Kot je navedeno v opombi 18, je treba tudi te zneske nekoliko zmanjšati, saj znašajo dodatna denarna sredstva 96,2 milijona.
It can nevertheless be concluded that it cannot be altered significantly.
Vendar je jasno, da se ne morejo bistveno spremeniti.
See point 40 of the 2004 Guidelines.
Glej točko 40 smernic iz leta 2004.
All three amounts increased compared to the February restructuring plan.
Vsi zneski so večji v primerjavi s februarskim načrtom prestrukturiranja.
The Commission’s decision to initiate the Article 88(2) procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [1].
Odločitev Komisije, da sproži postopek iz člena 88(2), je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [1].
Poland submitted its observations by letter of 7 March 2006, registered on 9 March 2006.
Poljska je predložila svoje pripombe z dopisom z dne 7. marca 2006, evidentiranim 9. marca 2006.
No comments were received from third parties.
Komisija ni prejela nobenih pripomb tretjih oseb.
The Commission had taken the decision of 20 December 2006 on the basis of a restructuring plan of HSW dated February 2006 (the ‘February plan’) and submitted by Poland on 9 March 2006.
Komisija je sprejela odločbo z dne 20. decembra 2006 na podlagi načrta prestrukturiranja družbe HSW iz februarja 2006 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: februarski načrt), ki ga je Poljska predložila 9. marca 2006.
After the decision of 20 December 2006 had been adopted, Poland notified by letter of 2 February 2007 (registered on 4 February 2007) an updated version of the plan dated November 2006 (‘November plan’).
Po sprejetju odločbe z dne 20. decembra 2006 je Poljska z dopisom z dne 2. februarja 2007 (evidentiranim 4. februarja 2007) priglasila posodobljeno različico načrta iz novembra 2006 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: novembrski načrt).
The Commission requested additional information about the modifications of the February plan by letters of 29 March 2007 and 21 May 2007.
Komisija je z dopisoma z dne 29. marca 2007 in 21. maja 2007 pozvala Poljsko, naj predloži dodatne informacije o spremembah februarskega načrta.
The Polish authorities replied respectively by letters of 30 April 2007, registered on that day, and 5 June 2007, registered on that day.
Poljski organi so odgovorili z dopisom z dne 30. aprila 2007, evidentiranim istega dne, in dopisom z dne 5. junija 2007, evidentiranim istega dne.
Comments were submitted by local authorities: the President of Stalowa Wola city by letter of 11 November 2008, the Starosta Powiatu Stalowa Wola by letter of 14 January 2008 and the Voivod of Podkarpackie Region by letter of 15 January 2008.
Pripombe so predložili lokalni organi: predsednik mesta Stalowa Wola z dopisom z dne 11. novembra 2008, guverner okrožja Stalowa Wola z dopisom z dne 14. januarja 2008 in vojvoda Podkarpatske regije z dopisom z dne 15. januarja 2008.
The following suppliers of HSW submitted comments: Clak Hurtownia Artykołow Przemysłowych H. Adamski, J. Lach T. Knie s.j. by letter of 10 January 2008, Kwadrat Sp. z o.o. by letter of 10 January 2008, Odlewnia Staliwa ‘Labedy’ Sp. z o.o by letter of 10 January 2008, Fabryka Maszyn Lubaczow Sp. z o.o. by letter of 11 January 2008 and SigmaKalon Cieszyn SA by letter of 11 January 2008.
Pripombe so predložili tudi naslednji dobavitelji družbe HSW: Clak Hurtownia Artykołow Przemysłowych H. Adamski, J. Lach T. Knie s.j. z dopisom z dne 10. januarja 2008, Kwadrat Sp. z o.o. z dopisom z dne 10. januarja 2008, Odlewnia Staliwa „Labedy“ Sp. z o.o z dopisom z dne 10. januarja 2008, Fabryka Maszyn Lubaczow Sp. z o.o. z dopisom z dne 11. januarja 2008 in SigmaKalon Cieszyn S.A. z dopisom z dne 11. januarja 2008.
The following banks cooperating with HSW submitted comments: Bank Pekao SA by letter of 11 January 2008 and BRE Bank S.A by letter of 14 January 2008.
Poleg tega sta pripombe predložili naslednji banki, ki sodelujeta z družbo HSW: Bank Pekao S.A. z dopisom z dne 11. januarja 2008 in BRE Bank S.A z dopisom z dne 14. januarja 2008.
Finally comments were submitted by ENESTA Sp. z o.o.
Pripombe sta predložila tudi podjetje ENESTA Sp. z o.o.
(energy supplier) by letter of 11 January 2008 and by the Social Insurance Fund by letter of 21 January 2008.
(dobavitelj energije) z dopisom z dne 11. januarja 2008 in Sklad socialnega zavarovanja z dopisom z dne 21. januarja 2008.
The beneficiary submitted comments by letter of 14 January 2008.
Upravičenka je predložila pripombe z dopisom z dne 14. januarja 2008.
In 2002 the beneficiary sought to address these difficulties by drawing up a restructuring plan for the period 2003-07.
Leta 2002 je upravičenka pripravila načrt prestrukturiranja za obdobje 2003–2007, da bi odpravila te težave.
This plan was amended in February 2006 (‘February Plan’).
Ta načrt je bil februarja 2006 spremenjen (v nadaljnjem besedilu: februarski načrt).
By letter of 2 February 2007 Poland informed the Commission of changes made to the restructuring plan in November 2006.
Poljska je z dopisom z dne 2. februarja 2007 Komisijo obvestila o spremembah načrta prestrukturiranja, izvedenih novembra 2006.
Poland feels that these changes will not alter the amount of State aid and are in line with point 52 of the 2004 Guidelines.
Poljska navaja, da te spremembe ne bodo spremenile zneska državne pomoči in da so v skladu s točko 52 smernic iz leta 2004.
By decision of 20 December 2006, the Commission authorised the restructuring aid for HSW on the basis of the company’s restructuring plan of February 2006.
Z odločbo z dne 20. decembra 2006 je Komisija odobrila pomoč za prestrukturiranje družbe HSW na podlagi načrta prestrukturiranja družbe iz februarja 2006.
On 10 October 2007 the Commission decided to initiate a formal investigation procedure following the notification of the November plan, which included additional support for HSW.
Komisija se je 10. oktobra 2007 odločila za sprožitev formalnega postopka preiskave na podlagi priglasitve novembrskega načrta, ki je vključeval dodatno podporo za družbo HSW.
While Poland claimed that HSW planned to reduce production capacity by 20 %, the plan provided for an increase in the use of production capacity from 27,7 % in 2002 to 66 % in 2007.
Čeprav je Poljska trdila, da je družba HSW načrtovala zmanjšanje proizvodne zmogljivosti za 20 %, naj bi se izkoriščenost proizvodne zmogljivosti v skladu z načrtom povečala s 27,7 % leta 2002 na 66 % leta 2007.
Second, the Polish authorities identified two modifications to the aid as originally notified by letter of 8 October 2004.
Poljski organi so opredelili dve spremembi pomoči, kot je bila prvotno priglašena z dopisom z dne 8. oktobra 2004.
The first and most important modification was that part of the planned State aid (a total of PLN 43,5 million) had been partially withdrawn and replaced by two measures, which were claimed not to constitute State aid.
Prva in najpomembnejša sprememba je bila, da je bil del načrtovane državne pomoči (skupno 43,5 milijona PLN) delno umaknjen, pri čemer sta ga nadomestila dva ukrepa, ki glede na navedbe nista bila državna pomoč.
Second, Poland emphasised that the scope of the investigation procedure initiated should encompass only the change to the restructuring plan on the basis of point 52 of the 2004 Guidelines and argued that the Commission should not take steps under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 to revoke the decision of 20 December 2006.
Poljska je prav tako poudarila, da bi moral obseg postopka preiskave, ki je bil sprožen, zajemati le spremembo načrta prestrukturiranja na podlagi točke 52 smernic iz leta 2004, in trdila, da Komisija ne bi smela uporabiti ukrepov iz člena 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999 za razveljavitev odločbe z dne 20. decembra 2006.
Poland invoked the principle of legal certainty in this respect.
Poljska se je sklicevala na načelo pravne varnosti v zvezi s tem.
Third, Poland claimed that the amount of aid had not increased, so there was no need for more extensive compensatory measures under point 52(b) of the 2004 Guidelines.
Poljska je trdila, da se znesek pomoči ni povečal, tako da obsežnejši izravnalni ukrepi iz točke 52(b) smernic iz leta 2004 niso bili potrebni.
Poland believes that the additional cash-flow generated by the debt-to-equity swap is being used by the company solely to maintain its position on the market.
Poljska meni, da uporablja družba dodaten denarni tok, ki se je ustvaril s konverzijo dolga v lastniški delež, le za ohranitev položaja na trgu.
Idem
Isto
The current Community Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty [23] entered into force on 10 October 2004.
Sedanje smernice Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah [23] so začele veljati 10. oktobra 2004.
The previous 1999 rescue and restructuring Guidelines [24] (‘1999 Guidelines’) apply to measures whose notification was registered before this date.
Pri priglasitvi ukrepov, ki je bila evidentirana pred tem datumom, se uporabljajo predhodne smernice za reševanje in prestrukturiranje iz leta 1999 [24] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: smernice iz leta 1999).
The measures described in rows III and IV of Table 5 were all granted after December 2004 and hence after the publication of the 2004 Guidelines.
Ukrepi iz vrstic III in IV tabele 5, so bili vsi odobreni po decembru 2004, torej po objavi smernic iz leta 2004.
Furthermore, the debt-to-equity swap was granted only in July 2007.
Poleg tega je bila konverzija dolga v lastniški delež odobrena samo julija 2007.
The Commission therefore concludes that the 2004 Guidelines apply to the present case with regard to both the notified and the non-notified measures, since they all relate to a single restructuring plan.
Komisija zato ugotavlja, da je treba v tem primeru smernice iz leta 2004 uporabljati za priglašene in nepriglašene ukrepe, ker se nanašajo na isti načrt prestrukturiranja.
HSW achieved a profit for the first time in 2005.
Družba HSW je imela leta 2005 prvič dobiček.
It also made a profit in the first half of 2006.
Dobiček je imela tudi v prvi polovici leta 2006.
The November plan suggested that profits would fall at the end of the restructuring period (2007), due to high restructuring costs and the fact that profits for 2005 were inflated by the one-off sale of assets in that year.
V novembrskem načrtu je navedeno, da se bo dobiček na koncu obdobja prestrukturiranja (2007) zmanjšal zaradi visokih stroškov prestrukturiranja in napihnjenega zneska dobička za leto 2005, ki je posledica enkratne prodaje premoženja v navedenem letu.
The Commission considers this capacity reduction to be insufficient, as the company is anyway planning to use only 66 % of its capacity at the end of the restructuring, i.e. in 2007.
Komisija meni, da tako zmanjšanje zmogljivosti ni zadostno, ker načrtuje družba na koncu obdobja prestrukturiranja, tj. leta 2007, v vsakem primeru uporabiti le 66 % zmogljivosti.
None of the information that the Commission has received from the Polish authorities suggests that the company was actually selling more than 1200 machines before the restructuring began.
Komisija ni od poljskih organov prejela nobenih podatkov, na podlagi katerih bi bilo mogoče potrditi, da je družba pred začetkom prestrukturiranja dejansko prodala več kot 1200 strojev.
The Polish authorities have provided sufficient evidence that HSW will be able to obtain such financing on the market, as it already benefited from private financing amounting to PLN 31,9 million (EUR 7,6 million) between 2003 and 2005.
Poljski organi so zagotovili zadostne dokaze, da je družba HSW zmožna pridobiti takšna finančna sredstva na trgu, saj je v obdobju 2003–2005 že pridobila zasebna finančna sredstva v znesku 31,9 milijona PLN (7,6 milijona EUR).
The Polish authorities claim that the beneficiary will be able to find market financing by the end of the restructuring period.
Poljski organi prav tako trdijo, da bo upravičenka zmožna poiskati finančna sredstva na trgu do konca obdobja prestrukturiranja.
The Commission noted, in the decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure, that HSW — Zakład Zespołów Mechanicznych received restructuring aid granted before accession for the period 2003-2007.
Komisija je v odločitvi o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave opozorila, da je podjetje HSW–Zakład Zespołów Mechanicznych prejelo pomoč za prestrukturiranje, ki je bila dodeljena za obdobje 2003–2007 pred pristopom.
It therefore had to be demonstrated that this restructuring aid had had no spillover effects on the parent company.
Zato je bilo treba dokazati, da pomoč za prestrukturiranje ni imela učinka prelitja na matično družbo.
The new restructuring plan was adopted by HSW’s management on 7 November 2006.
Novi načrt prestrukturiranja je uprava družbe HSW sprejela 7. novembra 2006.
On 8 December 2006 HSW’s supervisory board ratified the plan — at that stage, according to Poland, the plan could be treated as final.
Nadzorni svet družbe HSW je načrt ratificiral 8. decembra 2006, pri čemer bi se lahko načrt po navedbah Poljske tedaj obravnaval kot končni.
The ratio 30,84 % is the figure assumed by the modified restructuring decision of 17 June 2005.
Delež 30,84 % je podatek, ki ga predpostavlja spremenjena Odločba o prestrukturiranju z dne 17. junija 2005.
The amount written-off will then be 69,16 % of the overall liabilities.
Odpisani znesek bi tako znašal 69,16 % vseh obveznosti.
These amounts are PLN 1,7 million lower than those presented in the decision of 10 October 2007.
Ti zneski so za 1,7 milijona PLN manjši od zneskov iz odločbe z dne 10. oktobra 2007.
Poland explained that the debt-to-equity swap was implemented slightly later than initially planned, so HSW had repaid a higher amount of interest due, meaning that less remained to be repaid.
Poljska je pojasnila, da je družba HSW zaradi nekoliko poznejše izvedbe konverzije dolga v lastniški delež od prvotno načrtovane povrnila večji znesek zapadlih obresti, kar pomeni, da je znesek za povračilo manjši.
on State aid C 18/05 (ex N 438/04, N 194/05 and PL 34/04) awarded by Poland to Stocznia Gdańsk
o državni pomoči C 18/05 (ex N 438/04, N 194/05 in PL 34/04) Poljske za Stocznia Gdańsk
(notified under document C(2009) 5685)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 5685)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments [1] pursuant to the provisions cited above and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe [1] v skladu z navedenimi določbami, in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
Pursuant to Article 88(2) EC Treaty, Poland notified by letter of 8 October 2004, registered on the same day, restructuring aid measures extended in favour of Stocznia Gdańsk — Grupa Stoczni Gdynia S.A. (Gdańsk Shipyard).
V skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES je Poljska z dopisom z dne 8. oktobra 2004, evidentiranim istega dne, priglasila ukrepe pomoči za prestrukturiranje, razširjene v korist ladjedelnice Stocznia Gdańsk – Grupa Stoczni Gdynia S.A. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ladjedelnica Gdańsk).
Poland informed the Commission of these measures with a view to obtaining legal certainty that they had been granted before accession and therefore did not constitute new aid which could have been examined by the Commission under Article 88 EC Treaty.
Poljska je o teh ukrepih obvestila Komisijo, s čimer si je želela zagotoviti pravno varnost, da so bili dodeljeni pred pristopom in po pristopu niso pomenili nove pomoči, ki bi jo lahko Komisija obravnavala v skladu s členom 88 Pogodbe ES.
In the event of the Commission finding these measures to be new aid, Poland asked for them to be approved as restructuring aid.
Poljska je Komisijo pozvala, naj te ukrepe odobri kot pomoč za prestrukturiranje, če bo ugotovila, da so nova pomoč.