natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that the request contained sufficient prima facie evidence, the Commission announced on 13 August 2008 the initiation of a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation by a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3].
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom je Komisija ugotovila, da je zahteva vsebovala zadostne dokaze prima facie, in 13. avgusta 2008 z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3], naznanila začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
The investigation of dumping covered the period from 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2008 (‘the review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava dampinga je zajela obdobje od 1. julija 2007 do 30. junija 2008 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
In order to obtain the information deemed necessary for its investigation, the Commission sent an MET and IT claim form and a questionnaire to the applicant and received replies within the deadlines set for that purpose.
Komisija je, da bi pridobila za preiskavo potrebne informacije, vložniku poslala obrazec zahtevka za TGO in IO ter vprašalnik, ta pa jih je izpolnjene vrnil v določenem roku.
The Commission sought and verified all information deemed necessary for the determination of dumping.
Komisija je zahtevala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za določitev dampinga.
The Commission carried out verification visits at the premises of the applicant and its related company:
Komisija je izvedla preveritvene obiske v poslovnih prostorih vložnika in njegovega povezanega podjetja:
Header Plan Co. Ltd (Header Plan), Binh Hoa County, Vietnam,
Header Plan Co. Ltd („Header Plan“), Binh Hoa County, Vietnam,
Header Plan Inc., Taipei, Taiwan.
Header Plan Inc., Taipei, Tajvan.
In view of the possible need to establish some elements (SG&A cost and profit rate) of the normal value as explained in recitals 22 to 25, verification visits to establish these rates on the basis of data from another country, in this case Taiwan, took place at the premises of the following companies:
Glede na možno potrebo po ugotovitvi nekaterih elementov (PSA-stroški in stopnja dobička) normalne vrednosti, kakor je razloženo v uvodnih izjavah (22) do (25), so bili preveritveni obiski za določitev teh stopenj na podlagi podatkov iz druge države, v tem primeru Tajvana, izvedeni v prostorih naslednjih družb:
The product concerned by the present review is the same as that in the original investigation, that is to say certain SSF (the product concerned).
Izdelek, ki ga zadeva sedanji pregled, je enak kot navedeni v prvotni preiskavi, to je nekateri PENJ („zadevni izdelek“).
It is currently classifiable within CN codes 73181210, 73181410, 73181530, 73181551, 73181561 and 73181570.
Trenutno je uvrščen pod oznake KN 73181210, 73181410, 73181530, 73181551, 73181561 in 73181570.
There are many types of SSF (the most common ones are bolts and screws), each one being defined by its specific physical and technical characteristics and by the grade of stainless steel from which it is made.
Tipov pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov je precej (najbolj običajni so sorniki in vijaki), vsak pa je opredeljen s svojimi posebnimi fizičnimi in tehničnimi lastnostmi ter razredom nerjavnega jekla, iz katerega je izdelan.
The investigation revealed that the applicant did not sell the product concerned on the Vietnamese domestic market.
Preiskava je pokazala, da vložnik zadevnega izdelka ni prodajal na vietnamskem domačem trgu.
It also showed that SSF produced and sold on the Taiwanese domestic market and those exported to the Community from Vietnam have the same physical, chemical and technical characteristics and uses.
Pokazala je tudi, da so imeli PENJ, proizvedeni in prodani na domačem trgu v Tajvanu, in tisti, ki so bili iz Vietnama izvoženi v Skupnost, enake osnovne fizikalne, kemične in tehnične lastnosti in so bili namenjeni enaki uporabi.
Since the present review was limited to the determination of dumping as far as the applicant is concerned, no conclusions were reached with regard to the product produced and sold by the Community industry on the Community market.
Ker je bil sedanji pregled omejen na določitev dampinga glede vložnika, v zvezi z izdelkom, ki ga industrija Skupnosti proizvaja in prodaja na trgu Skupnosti, ni bilo sprejetih sklepnih ugotovitev.
In anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in Vietnam, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of Article 2 of the basic Regulation for those producers which were found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) thereof.
V protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom iz Vietnama se za tiste proizvajalce, ki izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, normalna vrednost določi v skladu z odstavki od 1 do 6 člena 2 osnovne uredbe.
Briefly, and for ease of reference only, the criteria in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, fulfilment of which the applicant companies have to demonstrate, are set out in summarised form below:
Merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, katerih izpolnjevanje morajo družbe vlagateljice dokazati, so na kratko in za lažjo referenco povzeta tako:
business decisions and costs are made in response to market conditions, and without significant State interference,
poslovne odločitve in stroški temeljijo na tržnih razmerah ter brez večjega poseganja države,
accounting records are independently audited in line with international accounting standards and applied for all purposes,
računovodske evidence se neodvisno revidirajo v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi in veljajo za vse namene,
there are no significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system,
odsotnost večjih izkrivljanj, prenesenih iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva,
legal certainty and stability are provided by bankruptcy and property laws,
pravno varnost in stabilnost zagotavljajo zakoni o stečaju in pravo lastninskih razmerij,
The applicant requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation and submitted a claim form for exporting producers.
Vložnik je zahteval TGO v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe ter predložil obrazec zahtevka za proizvajalce izvoznike.
The Commission sought and verified at the premises of the applicant all information submitted in the company’s request and deemed necessary.
Komisija je v prostorih vložnika poiskala in preverila vse informacije, navedene v njegovem zahtevku, za katere je menila, da je to potrebno.
The present investigation revealed that the situation of the applicant changed since the original investigation.
Sedanja preiskava je pokazala, da se je stanje vložnika po prvotni preiskavi spremenilo.
It was found that the applicant now meets all five MET criteria.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da vložnik zdaj izpolnjuje vseh pet meril za TGO.
In particular, the reasons why MET was denied in the original investigation were found to be no longer applicable and no other circumstances were found which could lead to a rejection of the MET claim.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da razlogi za neodobritev TGO v prvotni preiskavi ne veljajo več in da niso bile ugotovljene okoliščine, zaradi katerih bi lahko prišlo do zavrnitve zahtevka za TGO.
Therefore, after consulting the Advisory Committee, the applicant was granted MET.
Zato je bil vložniku po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom TGO odobren.
Both the applicant and the Community industry were given an opportunity to comment on the above findings.
Vložnik in industrija Skupnosti sta dobila možnost, da predložita pripombe na navedene ugotovitve.
The Community industry objected to the above findings by claiming that there would be a risk of circumvention by channelling exports from Taiwan via Vietnam.
Industrija Skupnosti je ugovarjala gornjim ugotovitvam, češ da obstaja tveganje izogibanja ukrepom z usmeritvijo izvoza iz Tajvana preko Vietnama.
It should first be noted that there is no link between granting MET to the applicant and any potential circumvention from Taiwan, since this may even be possible in case no MET is granted to the applicant.
Najprej je treba opozoriti, da ni povezave med odobritvijo TGO vložniku in morebitnim izogibanjem ukrepom preko Tajvana, saj bi to bilo možno celo v primeru, ko TGO vložniku ne bi bil odobren.
Secondly, the Community industry did not come forward with any underlying evidence supporting the allegations made.
Industrija Skupnosti razen tega ni predložila nobenih dokazov za utemeljitev domnev.
Finally, it is underlined that the Community industry did not object to the above findings, that is to say that the applicant fulfilled the criteria listed in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, which are the only relevant criteria to assess whether the company fulfilled the conditions to be granted MET.
Nazadnje je treba poudariti, da industrija Skupnosti ni ugovarjala navedenim ugotovitvam, to je da vložnik izpolnjuje merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, ki so edina ustrezna merila za oceno, ali družba izpolnjuje merila za odobritev TGO.
The claims of the Community industry had therefore to be rejected.
Trditve industrije Skupnosti je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
The applicant had no domestic sales in Vietnam of the product concerned.
Vložnik ni imel domače prodaje zadevnega izdelka v Vietnamu.
Whenever domestic prices cannot be used in order to establish normal value, another method has to be applied.
Kadar koli domačih cen ni mogoče uporabiti za določitev normalne vrednosti, je treba uporabiti drugo metodo.
Normal value was constructed by adding to the applicant’s manufacturing costs a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) and a reasonable margin of profit.
Normalna vrednost je bila konstruirana tako, da so se stroškom proizvodnje, ki jih imel vložnik, prišteli razumni zneski za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške („PSA-stroški“) ter primerna stopnja dobička.
Since the applicant had no domestic sales of the product concerned or of the same general category of product, and because the investigation was limited to one company, SG&A costs and profits could not be established pursuant to the methods set out in Article 2(6)(a) and Article 2(6)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Ker vložnik ni imel domače prodaje zadevnega izdelka ali izdelka iste splošne kategorije izdelka in ker je bila preiskava omejena na eno družbo, PSA-stroški in dobički niso mogli biti določeni na podlagi metod iz člena 2(6)(a) in (b) osnovne uredbe.
Instead, another reasonable method had to be found based on Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Namesto tega je bilo treba v skladu s členom 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe uporabiti drugo sprejemljivo metodo.
In the event that the applicant would be granted MET, it was foreseen in point 5(d) of the notice of initiation, to also use findings concerning the normal value established in an appropriate market economy country, e.g. for the purpose of replacing any unreliable cost or price elements in Vietnam which are needed in establishing the normal value, if reliable required data are not available in Vietnam.
Če bi bil vložniku priznan status TGO, je v točki 5(d) obvestila o začetku določeno, da se uporabijo tudi ugotovitve glede normalne vrednosti, določene v primerni državi s tržnim gospodarstvom, npr. za nadomestitev nezanesljivih stroškovnih ali cenovnih elementov v Vietnamu, ki so potrebni za določitev normalne vrednosti, če v Vietnamu ni na razpolago zanesljivih podatkov.
It was found reasonable to use the SG&A costs and profit rates of exporting producers of the like product in another country, in this case Taiwan, according to Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Presodilo se je, da je razumno uporabiti PSA-stroške in stopnje dobička proizvajalcev izvoznikov podobnega izdelka v drugi državi, v tem primeru Tajvanu, v skladu s členom 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe.
The domestic sales of the Taiwanese producers were found to have been made in the ordinary course of trade.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bila domača prodaja tajvanskih proizvajalcev izvedena v običajnem poteku trgovine.
Consequently, the SG&A costs and profit rates were calculated on their proportion to the total turnover for each product type.
Zato so bili PSA-stroški in stopnje dobička izračunani v sorazmerju s skupnim prometom za vsako vrsto izdelka.
The weighted average SG&A costs and profit rate of the Taiwanese companies were added to the manufacturing cost of the applicant to establish the constructed normal value.
Tehtano povprečje PSA-stroškov in stopnje dobička tajvanskih družb je bilo prišteto vložnikovim proizvodnim stroškom za določitev konstruirane normalne vrednosti.
All sales of the products concerned to the Community during the investigation period were made by a related company in Taiwan.
Vso prodajo zadevnega izdelka v Skupnosti v obdobju preiskave je izvedla povezana družba v Tajvanu.
Export prices were established in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, that is to say using the prices actually paid or payable to the related company by the first independent buyer in the Community in the RIP.
Izvozne cene so bile določene v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe, to je z uporabo cen, ki jih je povezani družbi dejansko plačeval ali jih plačuje prvi neodvisni kupec v Skupnosti med OPP.
Accordingly, adjustments were made for differences in transport, packing, credit cost, bank charges, commissions, rebates and insurance where applicable and supported by verified evidence.
V skladu s tem in kjer je bilo to potrebno ter podprto s preverjenimi dokazi, so bile izvedene prilagoditve za razlike v prevoznih stroških, stroških pakiranja in kreditov, bančnih stroških, provizijah, rabatih in zavarovalnih stroških.
The comparison as described above showed the existence of no dumping.
Primerjava, kakor je opisana zgoraj, je pokazala, da dampinga ni bilo.
Lasting nature of the circumstances prevailing during the RIP
Trajnost okoliščin, ki so prevladovale med OP
In accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether the circumstances on the basis of which the current dumping margin was based have changed and whether such change was of a lasting nature.
V skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe se je preučevalo, ali so se okoliščine, na katerih temelji veljavna stopnja dampinga, spremenile in ali je ta sprememba trajna.
Firstly, it should be noted that the applicant was able to prove that it should be granted MET, and was therefore eligible for its own individual dumping margin.
Prvič, treba je poudariti, da je vložnik dokazal, da mu je treba odobriti TGO, zato je bil upravičen do lastne individualne stopnje dampinga.
There was no indication that this situation would change in the foreseeable future.
Ni bilo nobenega pokazatelja, da bi se to stanje v predvidljivi prihodnosti spremenilo.
The price of the product concerned charged to the Community and to third countries did not differ significantly and followed the same trend between 2005 and the IP.
Cena zadevnega izdelka, zaračunana Skupnosti in tretjim državam, se ni znatno razlikovala in je sledila enakemu gibanju med letom 2005 in OP.
The investigation showed that the behaviour of the applicant, including the circumstances that led to the initiation of the present review, were unlikely to change in the foreseeable future in a manner that would affect the findings of the present review.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se obnašanje vložnika, vključno z okoliščinami, ki so privedle do začetka sedanjega pregleda, v predvidljivi prihodnosti verjetno ne bo tako spremenilo, da bi vplivalo na ugotovitve iz sedanjega pregleda.
This would therefore suggest that the changes concerned were of a lasting nature and therefore the conclusions of the review were long-lasting.
To pomeni, da so zadevne spremembe trajne, zato so sklepi pregleda dolgotrajni.
AMENDMENT OF THE MEASURES
SPREMEMBA UKREPOV
In view of the findings of no dumping as well as the lasting nature of the changed circumstances, it is considered that the continued imposition of the measure on imports from the applicant is not necessary to offset dumping.
Glede na ugotovitve, da dampinga ni bilo, in na trajnost spremenjenih okoliščin se meni, da za preprečevanje dampinga nadaljevanje ukrepov za uvoz vložnika ni več potrebno.
The measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1890/2005 on imports of certain SSF originating in Vietnam should therefore be repealed for HPV by amending that Regulation accordingly.
Ukrepe, ki so bili uvedeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 1890/2005 za uvoz nekaterih PENJ s poreklom iz Vietnama bi bilo treba razveljaviti glede družbe HPV z ustrezno spremembo navedene uredbe.
The applicant as well as the other parties concerned were informed of the facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to propose the repeal of the measures.
Vložnik in druge zainteresirane stranke so bili obveščeni o dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih naj bi se predlagala razveljavitev ukrepov.
No comments were received which would warrant a change in the above conclusions,
Komisija ni prejela nobenih pripomb, ki bi upravičevale spremembo gornjih sklepov –
The part of the table in Article 1(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1890/2005 concerning the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable on imports of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof originating in Vietnam shall be replaced by the following:
Del preglednice v členu 1(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1890/2005 o protidampinški dajatvi na uvoz nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov s poreklom iz Vietnama se nadomesti z naslednjim:
OJ L 302, 19.11.2005, p. 1.
UL L 302, 19.11.2005, str. 1.
OJ C 206, 13.8.2008, p. 12.
UL C 206, 13.8.2008, str. 12.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 769/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 769/2009
of 24 August 2009
z dne 24. avgusta 2009
This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 August 2009.
Ta uredba začne veljati 25. avgusta 2009.
Done at Brussels, 24 August 2009.
V Bruslju, 24. avgusta 2009
Commission Regulation (EC) No 770/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 770/2009
This Regulation shall enter into force on 26 August 2009.
Ta uredba začne veljati 26. avgusta 2009.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 771/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 771/2009
amending Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 as regards certain marketing standards in the fruit and vegetable sector
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1580/2007 v zvezi z nekaterimi tržnimi standardi v sektorju sadja in zelenjave
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) [1], and in particular Article 103a and Article 121(a) in conjunction with Article 4 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 z dne 22. oktobra 2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode („Uredba o enotni SUT“) [1] ter zlasti člena 103a in člena 121(a) v povezavi s členom 4 Uredbe,
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules of Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector [2] has been significantly amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1221/2008 [3] with effect from 1 July 2009 as regards the provisions on marketing standards.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1580/2007 z dne 21. decembra 2007 o določitvi izvedbenih pravil za uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2200/96, (ES) št. 2201/96 in (ES) št. 1182/2007 v sektorju sadja in zelenjave [2] je znatno spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1221/2008 [3], z veljavnostjo od 1. julija 2009, v zvezi z določbami o tržnih standardih.
However, a newly introduced provision on products to be exempted from the general marketing standard should be clarified.
Vendar je treba novo uvedeno določbo o proizvodih, ki se izvzamejo iz splošnih tržnih standardov, natančno opredeliti.
Article 53(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 provides that the value of marketed production for the reference period shall be as calculated under the legislation applicable in the reference period referred to in that Article.
Člen 53(7) Uredbe (ES) št. 1580/2007 določa, da se vrednost tržne proizvodnje za referenčno obdobje izračuna na podlagi zakonodaje, veljavne v referenčnem obdobju iz navedenega člena.
It is desirable to apply this principle also to the value of the marketed production of producer groups.
Zaželeno je, da bi se to načelo uporabljalo tudi za vrednost tržne proizvodnje skupin proizvajalcev.
In 2008 the Working Party on Agricultural Quality Standards of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) revised the UNECE standards on lettuces, curled-leaved endives and broad-leaved (Batavian) endives, pears and tomatoes.
Leta 2008 je delovna skupina za standarde kakovosti v kmetijstvu v okviru Ekonomske komisije Združenih narodov za Evropo (UNECE) popravila standarde UNECE za solato, kodrolistno endivijo in endivijo eskariol, hruške ter paradižnike.
In order to avoid unnecessary barriers to trade, where specific marketing standards for fruit and vegetables exist at Community level, such standards should be the same as the UNECE standards.
Da bi se izognili nepotrebnim oviram pri trgovanju, kadar na ravni Skupnosti obstajajo določeni tržni standardi za sadje in zelenjavo, morajo biti takšni standardi isti kot standardi UNECE.
Therefore, the specific standards for those fruit and vegetables provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 should be aligned with the new UNECE standards.
Zato je treba posebne standarde za navedeno sadje in zelenjavo iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1580/2007 uskladiti z novimi standardi UNECE.
In Article 3(3b), point (a) is replaced by the following:
v členu 3(3b) se točka (a) nadomesti z naslednjim:
non-cultivated mushrooms of CN code 070959’;
negojene gobe z oznako KN 070959“;
In Article 44, the following paragraph 3 is added:
členu 44 se doda naslednji odstavek 3:
The value of the marketed production shall be as calculated under the legislation applicable as regards the period for which the aid is claimed.’;
Vrednost tržne proizvodnje se izračuna na podlagi zakonodaje, veljavne glede na obdobje, za katero se zahteva pomoč.“;
Parts 4, 6 and 10 of Part B of Annex I are replaced by the text in Parts A, B and C in the Annex to this Regulation.
točke 4, 6 in 10 dela B Priloge I se nadomestijo z besedilom v točkah A, B in C iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
OJ L 336, 13.12.2008, p. 1.
UL L 336, 13.12.2008, str. 1.
‘Part 4:
„Točka 4:
Marketing standard for lettuces, curled-leaved endives and broad-leaved (Batavian) endives
Tržni standard za solato, kodrolistno endivijo in endivijo eskariol
Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata L. (head (cabbage) lettuces including crisphead and “Iceberg” type lettuces),
Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata L. (glavnate solate, ki vključujejo mehkolistne in krhkolistne solate),
(cos or romaine lettuces),
(vezivka),
Lactuca sativa L. var. crispa L. (leaf lettuces),
Lactuca sativa L. var. crispa L. (rezivka in berivka),
crosses of these varieties and
za križance teh sort in
curled-leaved endives of varieties (cultivars) grown from Cichorium endivia L. var. crispa Lam., and
sorte (kultivarje) kodrolistne endivije, vzgojene iz rodu Cichorium endivia L. var. crispum Lam. in
broad-leaved (Batavian) endives (escaroles) of varieties (cultivars) grown from Cichorium endivia L. var. latifolium Lam.
sorte (kultivarje) endivije eskariol, vzgojene iz rodu Cichorium endivia L. var. latifolium Lam.,
The purpose of the standard is to define the quality requirements for produce after preparation and packaging.
Namen standarda je opredeliti zahteve kakovosti za proizvode po pripravi in pakiranju.
intact
nepoškodovan,
sound; produce affected by rotting or deterioration such as to make it unfit for consumption is excluded
zdrave; izključene so tiste hruške, ki jih je prizadela gniloba ali katera koli druga bolezen, zaradi česar niso primerne za prehrano,