natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It does not cover PPAs that ended before that date.
Ne vključuje SNEE, ki so se iztekli pred tem datumom.
The price formulae applied in the PPAs are extremely complex; however, they follow the same principles as the methodology applied by the Hungarian Energy Office before January 2004.
Cenovne formule v SNEEh so zelo zapletene, vendar kljub temu sledijo enakim načelom kot metodologija, ki jo je izvajal Madžarski urad za energetiko pred januarjem 2004.
According to the submissions of the Hungarian authorities [22], the annex to the PPAs concerning price definition was drawn up using the formulae and definitions of the above-mentioned Government Decree 1074/1995 on electricity price regulation.
V skladu s predloženimi stališči madžarskih organov [22] je bila priloga k SNEE o določitvi cene zasnovana s pomočjo uporabe formul in opredelitev zgoraj omenjene uredbe vlade 1074/1995 o uravnavanju cen električne energije.
The first new price decree entered into force on 9 December 2006.
Prva uredba o novi ceni je začela veljati 9. decembra 2006.
As of that date, the price regulation of the PPAs was again overwritten by the governmental price formula for a period of approximately one year (until 31 December 2007).
Od tega dne je vladna cenovna formula znova nadomestila uravnavanje cen SNEE za obdobje približno enega leta (do 31. decembra 2007).
Kelenfold:
Kelenföld
Firstly, none of the PPAs entered into force before 10 December 1994.
Prvič, nobeden izmed SNEE ni začel veljati pred 10. decembrom 1994.
Secondly, none of the PPAs had been included on the existing aid list annexed to Annex IV to the Accession Act.
Drugič, nobeden izmed SNEE ni bil vključen na seznam že obstoječe pomoči, ki je priložena Prilogi IV k Aktu o pristopu.
The country took the decision to join the European Union, becoming a full Member State on 1 May 2004.
Država se je odločila, da se bo pridružila Evropski uniji, in je 1. maja 2004 postala polnopravna članica.
It was well aware of its obligation to bring its existing measures into line with the competition rules of the internal market it wished to join, since the Europe Agreement [51], signed by Hungary in 1991, explicitly refers to that obligation.
Dobro se je zavedala svojih obveznosti glede uskladitve svojih že obstoječih ukrepov s pravili konkurence na notranjem trgu, ki se mu je želela pridružiti, saj se Evropski sporazum [51], ki ga je Madžarska podpisala leta 1991, izrecno nanaša na to obveznost.
[…] power plant argues in its comments that ‘The PPAs are an important element for the banks to agree to finance the investment and pre-finance the operating costs on a continuous basis. […] On […], […] asked for the consortium's [i.e. the financial institutions’] view on a potential amendment of the PPAs.
Elektrarna […] v svojih pripombah trdi, da so „SNEE pomemben element za to, da se banke strinjajo s financiranjem naložbe in predplačilom operativnih stroškov[…] […] je […] prosil za mnenje konzorcija [tj. finančnih ustanov] glede možne spremembe SNEE.
An important element to be taken into consideration in this respect is the partial opening of the electricity market in 2003.
Pomemben element, ki ga je v zvezi s tem treba upoštevati, je delno odprtje trga z električno energijo v letu 2003.
On 18 December 2001 the Hungarian Parliament adopted Energy Act II, which allowed large consumers, defined as those which consumed more than 6,5 GW/year, to become ‘eligible consumers’ and therefore be allowed to choose their supplier of electricity.
decembra 2001 je madžarski parlament sprejel Energetski zakon II, ki je omogočal večjim potrošnikom, med katere se prištevajo tisti, ki porabijo več kot 6,5 GW/leto, da postanejo „upravičeni kupci“ in lahko zato sami izberejo svojega dobavitelja električnega toka.
The PPAs expire between the end of 2010 and the end of 2024.
SNEE potečejo med koncem leta 2010 in koncem leta 2024.
The above conditions of MVM's purchase obligation will remain unchanged until the end of the agreements.
Zgornji pogoji glede obveznosti nakupa MVM ostanejo nespremenjeni do izteka sporazumov.
In its Energy Sector Inquiry [98] the Commission also assesses the effects of PPAs on competition and trade.
V raziskavi energetskega sektorja [98] Komisija ocenjuje učinke SNEE na konkurenco in trgovino.
It may even be the case that the guaranteed off-take provided for in the PPAs is increasingly in excess of real MVM needs, in particular after full liberalisation of the energy market in January 2008.
Lahko se zgodi, da zagotovljena količina odjema, ki jo določajo SNEE, vedno bolj presega resnične potrebe MVM-ja, še zlasti po dokončni liberalizaciji trga z električno energijo v januarju 2008.
The electricity surplus may lead to even higher unknown costs, increasing the unpredictability of the State's exact exposure under PPAs still further.
Presežek električne energije lahko vodi do še višjih neopredeljenih stroškov, kar povečuje nepredvidljivost izpostavljenosti države v okviru SNEE.
The PPAs concerned by this Decision entered into force between 1995 and 2001, i.e. before Hungary joined the EU on 1 May 2004.
SNEE, na katere se nanaša ta odločba, so začeli veljati med letoma 1995 in 2001, tj, pred vstopom Madžarske v EU dne 1. maja 2004.
This Decision concerns only the PPAs that were in force at the date of accession.
Ta odločba se nanaša samo na SNEE, ki so bili veljavni na datum pristopa.
Hungary officially applied for accession on 31 March 1994.
Madžarska je uradno zaprosila za pristop 31. marca 1994.
At the time when the parties concluded the PPAs (1995 to 2001), in line with Article 62 of the Europe Agreement Hungary was already required to bring the rules of competition into line with the EC Treaty.
V času, ko so podpisnice sklepale SNEE (od leta 1995 do leta 2001), je morala Madžarska v skladu s členom 62 Evropskega sporazuma že uskladiti pravila konkurence s Pogodbo ES.
From the date of accession, the provisions of the original basic Treaties and those of the secondary legislation became binding in Hungary, in line with Article 2 of the Accession Act.
Od datuma pristopa so določbe originalnih osnovnih pogodb in tiste v okviru sekundarne zakonodaje postale zavezujoče na Madžarskem, v skladu s členom 2 Akta o pristopu.
Adopted by the Commission on 26 July 2001.
Sprejela Komisija dne 26. julija 2001.
The Methodology is available on the Commission's website: http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/state_aid/legislation/specific_rules.html
Metodologija je na voljo na spletni strani Komisije http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/state_aid/legislation/specific_rules.html
They were submitted to the Commission by the Hungarian authorities by letter of 4 June 2004.
Madžarski organi so jih Komisiji posredovali z dopisom z dne 4 Junija 2004.
The same figures appear in the report on the study of the Hungarian electricity market carried out by the Hungarian Competition Authority (15 May 2006).
Iste številke so navedene v poročilu o raziskavi madžarskega trga z električno energijo, ki jo je izvedel madžarski organ za konkurenco (15. maja 2006).
The figures of the table are based on the PPAs as submitted to the Commission by the Hungarian authorities.
Vrednosti v tabeli temeljijo na SNEE, kot so jih Komisiji predložili madžarski organi.
See also the letter of the Hungarian authorities registered on 21 April 2008.
Glej tudi dopis madžarskih organov, evidentiran 21. aprila 2008.
The figures of the table are based on the PPAs as submitted by the Hungarian authorities, the statistics published by the Hungarian Energy Office on its website: www.eh.gov.hu, and the letter of the Hungarian authorities dated 21 April 2008.
Vrednosti v tabeli temeljijo na SNEE, kot so jih Komisiji predložili madžarski organi, statistiki, ki jo je objavil Madžarski energetski urad na svoji spletni strani: www.eh.gov.hu, in dopisu madžarskih organov z dne 21. aprila 2008.
The quantities of guaranteed off-take stipulated in the yearly commercial agreements may differ somewhat from the quantities provided for in the PPAs themselves.
Količine zagotovljenega odjema, določene z letnimi trgovinskimi sporazumi, se lahko razlikujejo od količin v samih SNEE.
The final report of this Energy Sector Inquiry, which was issued on 10 January 2007, is used in this Decision as a source of information concerning main commercial trends and practices on European electricity markets which were already prevailing when Hungary joined the European Union on 1 May 2004.
Končno poročilo te preiskave energetskega sektorja, ki je bilo izdano 10. januarja 2007, se uporablja v tej odločbi kot vir informacij o poglavitnih trgovinskih smernicah in praksah na evropskih trgih z električno energijo, ki so že prevladovale, ko se je Madžarska dne 1. maja 2004 pridružila Evropski uniji.
The report is available at http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/antitrust/others/sector_inquiries/energy/
To poročilo je dostopno na http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/antitrust/others/sector_inquiries/energy/.
The figures in the table are based on the letters from the Hungarian authorities registered on 24 September 2007 and 16 January 2008.
Vrednosti v tabeli temeljijo na dopisih madžarskih organov, ki sta bila evidentirana 24. septembra 2007 in 16. januarja 2008.
There are certain minor differences (of less than 5 %) between the figures provided in the two information letters with regard to the prices for 2006.
Obstajajo manjše razlike (manjše od 5 %) med vrednostmi, zajetimi v dveh dopisih z informacijami glede cen za leto 2006.
Information based on the letter from the Hungarian authorities registered on 24 September 2007.
Podatki, ki temeljijo na dopisu madžarskih organov, evidentiranim dne 24. septembra 2007.
The company E.ON DKCE also sold electricity to the free market in 2005 and 2006.
Podjetje E.ON DKCE je tudi prodajalo električno energijo na prosti trg leta 2005 in 2006.
However, according to information provided by the Hungarian authorities by letter registered on 22 April 2008, the quantities sold were minor, so the Hungarian authorities did not have the corresponding price data.
Kljub temu pa so bile, glede na informacije, ki so jih predložili madžarski organi z dopisom, evidentiranim dne 22. aprila 2008, prodane količine manjše, zato madžarski organi niso imeli ustreznih podatkov o cenah.
Information based on the letters of the Hungarian authorities registered on 24 September 2007 and 16 January 2008.
Podatki, ki temeljijo na dopisih madžarskih organov evidentiranih 24. septembra 2007 in 16. januarja 2008.
There are minor differences (of less than 2 %) between the figures provided in the two information letters.
Med vrednostmi, ki so zajete v te dveh informativnih dopisih, obstajajo manjše razlike (manjše od 2 %).
Published in November 2006.
Objavljeno novembra 2006.
The original title is ‘A hosszú távú áramvásárlási szerződések megszűnésének hatása a villamos energia nagykereskedelmi árára’.
Originalen naslov je „A hosszú távú áramvásárlási szerződések megszűnésének hatása a villamos energia nagykereskedelmi árára“.
The Hungarian authorities notified the measure on 31 March 2004.
Madžarski organi so priglasili ukrep 31. marca 2004.
After an exchange of information, the Commission did not, the parties claim, react to Hungary's letter of 19 October 2004 within a period of 3 months, thereby ruling out classification of the measure as ‘new aid’.
Po izmenjavi informacij se Komisija ni, kot to trdijo stranke, odzvala na pismo z dne 19. oktobra 2004 v roku 3 mesecev in s tem ni upoštevala uvrstitve ukrepa med „novo pomoč“.
In recitals 467 to 473, it concludes that ‘Long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) are another factor which may affect the volumes that are traded on a regular basis on wholesale markets.’ With regard to the PPAs in Poland, it argues that ‘they may well constitute a significant barrier to the development of the Polish wholesale market.’
V uvodnih izjavah od 467 do 473 ugotavlja, da so „dolgoročni sporazumi o nakupu energije (SNEE) še en dejavnik, ki lahko vpliva količine, s katerimi se običajno trguje na veleprodajnih trgih.“ V zvezi s SNEE na Poljskem trdi, da „lahko predstavljajo večjo oviro pri razvoju poljskega veleprodajnega trga.“ Navaja tudi, da „podobno stanje vlada tudi na Madžarskem, kjer je Magyar Villamos Művek (‚MVM‘) trgovec na debelo v sektorju javne porabe in pridobiva električno energijo s pomočjo dolgoročnih SNEE, ki jo nato prodaja lokalnim trgovcem na drobno.
It then goes on to say that ‘A similar situation exists in Hungary, where Magyar Villamos Művek (MVM) is the public utility wholesaler and acquires electricity by means of long-term PPAs that is subsequently sold to the local retailers. The Hungarian PPAs cover the vast majority of that Member State's electricity needs, which may have effects on wholesale trading similar to, or even going further than, those described above in the context of the Polish wholesale market’.
Madžarski SNEE pokrivajo večino potreb omenjene države članice, kar lahko vpliva na veleprodajno trgovino na podoben način ali pa še v večji meri, kot je to opisano v primeru poljskega veleprodajnega trga.“
A comparison between the proposed quantities and successfully auctioned products [99], however, shows that MVM sold all proposed products at nearly each auction. Indeed, in most cases it even needed to use the 10 % maximum additional products it is legally allowed to propose.
Vendar pa primerjava med ponujenimi količinami in uspešno prodanimi proizvodi na avkcijah [99] kaže, da je MVM skoraj na vsaki avkciji prodal vse ponujene proizvode V večini primerov je moral uporabiti celo do 10 % več proizvodov, kot jih je zakonsko dovoljeno ponuditi.
on the measures C 16/04 (ex NN 29/04, CP 71/02 and CP 133/05) implemented by Greece in favour of Hellenic Shipyards
o ukrepih C 16/04 (ex NN 29/04, CP 71/02 in CP 133/05) Grčije za Hellenic Shipyards
(notified under document C(2008) 3118)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 3118)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenima členoma, in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
By letter dated 9 September 2003, the Greek authorities submitted to the Commission an application by Hellenic Shipyards S.A. (hereafter ‘HSY’) for amendments to the investment plan for its restructuring, in favour of which aid was authorised by Commission decision of 15 July 1997 in case N 401/97 (hereafter ‘decision N 401/97’).
Grški ograni so z dopisom z dne 9. septembra 2003 Komisiji predložili prošnjo podjetja Hellenic Shipyards S.A. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: podjetje HSY) za spremembe naložbenega načrta za prestrukturiranje podjetja, na podlagi katerega je bila z odločbo Komisije z dne 15. julija 1997 v zadevi N 401/97 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: odločba N 401/97) odobrena pomoč.
By letter dated 31 October 2003, the Greek authorities explained that the amended plan was communicated to the Commission ‘for its information’, and was not meant to be a notification.
Grški organi so z dopisom z dne 31. oktobra 2003 pojasnili, da so spremenjeni načrt poslali Komisiji „v vednost“, kar pa ni bilo mišljeno kot priglasitev.
By letter dated 18 November 2003, the Commission asked the Greek authorities to clarify whether they intended to grant or disburse aid to HSY for the purposes of the amended investment plan.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 18. novembra 2003 grške organe prosila, naj pojasnijo, ali nameravajo za namene spremenjenega naložbenega načrta pomoč podjetju HSY odobriti ali izplačati.
In the same letter, the Commission reminded the Greek authorities that in such a case, and in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (hereafter ‘Regulation (EC) No 659/1999’) this aid should be notified to the Commission and should not be implemented before the Commission has taken a formal decision in that respect.
V istem dopisu je Komisija opozorila grške organe, da je treba v tem primeru v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Uredba (ES) št. 659/1999) to pomoč priglasiti Komisiji, pomoči pa se ne sme izvajati, dokler Komisija v zvezi s tem ne sprejme uradne odločitve.
By letter dated 16 January 2004 the Greek authorities stated that the aid they intend to grant is ‘existing aid’, covered by the terms of the Commission’s approval decision of 1997, and that the Greek authorities have jurisdiction to approve amendments to the restructuring plan, including the prolongation of the timetable for the plan’s implementation.
Grški organi so v dopisu z dne 16. januarja 2004 navedli, da je pomoč, ki jo nameravajo odobriti, „obstoječa pomoč“, za katero veljajo pogoji odločbe Komisije o odobritvi iz leta 1997, in da so grški organi pristojni za odobritev sprememb načrta prestrukturiranja, vključno s podaljšanjem roka za izvedbo načrta.
By letter dated 20 February 2004, the Commission communicated to the Greek authorities its doubts regarding the validity of the above statements.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 20. februarja 2004 grškim organom sporočila svoje dvome v zvezi z veljavnostjo zgoraj navedenih izjav.
By letter dated 27 February 2004, the Greek authorities stated that no aid had been granted to HSY to that date.
Grški organi so v dopisu z dne 27. februarja 2004 navedli, da do navedenega datuma podjetju HSY ni bila odobrena nikakršna pomoč.
By decision C(2004) 1359 of 20 April 2004 (hereafter ‘the opening decision’), the Commission initiated the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the Treaty with respect to the amendments made to the investment plan which is partly financed by the investment aid authorised by decision N 401/97.
Komisija je z odločbo C(2004) 1359 z dne 20. aprila 2004 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: odločba o sprožitvi postopka) sprožila postopek na podlagi člena 88(2) Pogodbe v zvezi s spremembami naložbenega načrta, ki je delno financiran z naložbeno pomočjo, odobreno z odločbo N 401/97.
The opening decision indicates also that the State-owned bank Hellenic Bank of Industrial Development (hereinafter ‘ETVA’) granted several loans and guarantees to HSY and that the Greek authorities have not provided yearly reports as they should have done.
V odločbi o sprožitvi postopka je navedeno, da je Grška banka za industrijski razvoj v državni lasti (v nadaljnjem besedilu: banka ETVA) podjetju HSY odobrila več posojil in poroštev ter da grški organi še niso predložili letnih poročil, kar bi že morali storiti.
After having requested and received extensions of the deadline to submit comments, Greece submitted comments on the opening decision by letter of 20 October 2004.
Grčija je na podlagi odobrenih odlogov za predložitev pripomb, za katere je zaprosila, pripombe v zvezi z odločbo o sprožitvi postopka predložila z dopisom z dne 20. oktobra 2004.
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Odločba Komisije o sprožitvi postopka je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measures.
Komisija je zainteresirane stranke pozvala, naj predložijo svoje pripombe o ukrepih.
By letter of 29 March 2005, the Commission sent additional comments of Elefsis to Greece, which replied by letter of 23 May 2005.
Dodatne pripombe podjetja Elefsis je Komisija poslala Grčiji z dopisom z dne 29. marca 2005, na katerega je Grčija odgovorila z dopisom z dne 23. maja 2005.
From 2002, the Commission had started to receive letters of complaint from Elefsis, which asserted that HSY has benefited from several unlawful and incompatible aid measures and misused aids authorised by the Commission.
Podjetje Elefsis je začelo leta 2002 Komisiji pošiljati pritožbe, v katerih je trdilo, da je bilo podjetju HSY zagotovljenih več nezakonitih in nezdružljivih ukrepov pomoči ter da je podjetje HSY zlorabilo pomoči, ki jih je odobrila Komisija.
These complaints were registered under the numbers CP 71/02 and CP 133/05.
Te pritožbe so bile evidentirane pod številkama CP 71/02 in CP 133/05.
The Commission met the Greek authorities on 22 March 2006 (on this occasion the Greek authorities were accompanied by representatives of HSY as well as Piraeus Bank and provided the Commission with some additional documents), the complainant on 10 January 2003, 14 January 2005, 10 March 2005, 20 May 2005, 19 October 2005, 8 November 2005 and 23 March 2006, and Thyssen Krupp Marine Systems AG (hereafter ‘TKMS’) on 21 March 2006.
Komisija se je 22. marca 2006 sestala z grškimi organi (ob tej priložnosti so grške organe spremljali predstavniki podjetja HSY in Piraeus Banke, ki so Komisiji predložili nekatere dodatne dokumente), s pritožnikom se je sestala 10. januarja 2003, 14. januarja 2005, 10. marca 2005, 20. maja 2005, 19. oktobra 2005, 8. novembra 2005 in 23. marca 2006, s podjetjem Thyssen Krupp Marine Systems AG (v nadaljnjem besedilu: podjetje TKMS) pa se je sestala 21. marca 2006.
By decision C(2006) 2983 of 4 July 2006 (hereafter the extension decision), the Commission extended the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the Treaty to include several additional measures in favour of HSY.
Komisija je s svojo odločbo C(2006) 2983 z dne 4. julija 2006 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: odločba o podaljšanju postopka) podaljšala postopek iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe, da bi v korist podjetja HSY vključila nekatere dodatne ukrepe.
This extension decision also concludes that several non-notified measures either fall within the scope of Article 296 of the Treaty or do not constitute aid in the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty.
V tej odločbi o podaljšanju postopka je ugotovljeno tudi, da nekaj nepriglašenih ukrepov bodisi spada na področje uporabe člena 296 Pogodbe bodisi ne pomeni pomoči v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe.
This extension of the procedure in case C 16/04 was made without prejudice to any other existing or forthcoming State aid procedure concerning HSY, notably procedure C 40/02.
Podaljšanje postopka v zadevi C 16/04 je bilo izvršeno brez poseganja v katere koli druge obstoječe ali prihodnje postopke za dodelitev državne pomoči, ki se nanašajo na podjetje HSY, zlasti pa v postopek C 40/02.
After having requested and received an extension of the deadline to reply, Greece replied to the extension decision by letter of 5 October 2006.
Grčija je na podlagi odobrenega odloga za odgovor na odločbo o podaljšanju postopka, za katerega je zaprosila, odgovorila z dopisom z dne 5. oktobra 2006.
The Commission decision to extend the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Odločba Komisije o podaljšanju postopka je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The Commission received comments from the following interested parties.
Komisija je prejela pripombe od naslednjih zainteresiranih strank.
A meeting was held on 8 May 2007 between the Commission and TKMS/GNSH as well as HSY’s laywer.
Komisija se je 8. maja 2007 sestala s podjetjema TKMS/GNSH in odvetnikom podjetja HSY.
The meeting took place on 5 March 2008.
Srečanje je potekalo 5. marca 2008.
Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 indicates that the Member State and the other interested parties have a one-month period to submit comments and ‘In duly justified cases, the Commission may extend the prescribed period’.
V členu 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999 je navedeno, da lahko država članica in druge zainteresirane stranke predložijo pripombe v roku enega meseca ter da „[v] ustrezno upravičenih primerih lahko Komisija predpisano obdobje podaljša“.
In the present case, the parties have continued to make submissions (and to request meetings with the Commission) after the expiration of this period.
V tem primeru so stranke pošiljale pripombe (ter zahtevale srečanja s Komisijo) tudi po izteku tega obdobja.