natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Thus, from a legal point of view, the opposite scenario, i.e. letting measures expire, would only need to be further analysed if there are specific indications in the case that this would constitute a disproportionate burden for importers, retailers or consumers.
Nasprotni scenarij, tj. iztek ukrepov, bi bilo tako s pravnega vidika treba nadalje preučiti le, če bi v dokumentaciji obstajali elementi, na podalgi katerih bi se dalo sklepati, da bi bil iztek ukrepov nesorazmerno breme za uvoznike, trgovce na drobno ali potrošnike.
No such indications were found.
Takšnih elementov ni bilo.
However, and for the sake of the argument only, the following could be said about the likely effects on importers, retailers and consumers if measures would lapse.
Vendar je treba, zgolj zaradi argumentiranja, o verjetnih učinkih prenehanja ukrepov na uvoznike, trgovce na drobno in potrošnike povedati naslednje.
As regards importers, the investigation showed that a certain part of their loss of profitability from 2005 until the RIP could be attributed to the anti-dumping duties paid.
V zvezi z uvozniki je preiskava pokazala, da je del zmanjšanja njihove dobičkonosnosti od leta 2005 do OPP mogoče pripisati plačanim protidampinškim dajatvam.
Should measures lapse and all other costs remain stable, these costs would disappear and in that respect, the profit levels might increase to a level higher than the roughly 20 % found during the investigation.
Če ukrepi prenehajo veljati, vsi drugi stroški pa ostanejo nespremenjeni, tega stroška ne bo več, in tako bi lahko stopnja dobička narasla na več kot približno 20 %, kot je bilo ugotovljeno med preiskavo.
For retailers, it is unclear from the information on file whether they would benefit from an expiry of the measures, because the sampled importers did not always adapt their resale prices in case the import prices dropped, as it can be seen by a comparison of the arithmetic average import price and arithmetic average resales price from 2007 to the RIP.
Za trgovce na drobno iz informacij v dokumentaciji ni razvidno, ali bi od prenehanja veljavnosti ukrepov imeli korist, saj vzorčeni uvozniki svojih cen za ponovno prodajo niso vedno prilagodili, če so se uvozne cene znižale, kar je razvidno iz primerjave aritmetične povprečne uvozne cene z aritmetičnimi povprečnimi cenami za ponovno prodajo v obdobju od leta 2007 do OPP.
As regards the effect on consumers, it is even more unlikely that an expiry of the measures would lead to decreasing prices, given that retail prices remained largely stable despite the price movements at import level from 2005 until the RIP.
V zvezi z učinkom na potrošnike je še manj verjetno, da bi prenehanje veljavnosti ukrepov privedlo do znižanja cen, glede na to, da so maloprodajne cene ostale na splošno nespremenjene kljub gibanju cen na ravni uvoza od leta 2005 do OPP.
Moreover, it is unlikely as well that consumers would benefit via an increased choice given that there is no evidence on file demonstrating that the choice for the consumers was affected by the imposition of anti-dumping duties.
Poleg tega prav tako ni verjetno, da bi potrošniki imeli koristi zaradi povečane izbire glede na to, da v dokumentaciji ni dokazov o tem, da so protidampinške dajatve vplivale na izbiro.
In any event, all this cannot alter the overall conclusions that there are no compelling reasons not to maintain the measures.
V nobenem primeru to ne more spremeniti splošnega sklepa, da ni tehtnih razlogov, da se ukrepi ne bi ohranili.
Some importers and their associations claimed that the impact of the crisis was underestimated and that the effects of the downturn will continue to worsen.
Nekaj uvoznikov in njihovih združenj je trdilo, da je bil učinek krize podcenjen in da bodo učinki gospodarskega upada še hujši.
Firstly, these claims have been insufficiently substantiated as not concrete data relating to the product concerned was submitted.
Prvič, te trditve niso bile zadostno utemeljene, saj niso bili predloženi nobeni konkretni podatki v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom.
As stated in recitals 436 et seqq. of the Regulation, the impact of the crisis has been analysed until June 2009 on the basis of best data available i.e. an additional questionnaire was sent out in order to have a look specifically at this issue.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (436) Uredbe in naslednjih, je bil učinek krize preučen do junija 2009 na podlagi najzanesljivejših razpoložljivih podatkov, tj. poslan je bil dodaten vprašalnik, da bi z njim preučili samo to vprašanje.
On the basis of the information collected, a prudent analysis of the data obtained was done and it is clear that this analysis is mainly based on data until June 2009.
Na podlagi zbranih informacij je bila opravljena previdna analiza pridobljenih podatkov, in jasno je, da ta analiza temelji predvsem na podatkih do junija 2009.
It can thus not be ruled out that the impact of the economic crisis on consumption and prices is worse than it was until June 2009, but it can still be concluded that given the profit level well above 15 %, the importers are unlikely to suddenly be disproportionately affected by the isolated effect of anti-dumping duties.
Zato ni mogoče izključiti, da je učinek ekonomske krize na potrošnjo in cene večji, kot je bil do junija 2009, vendar je še vedno mogoče skleniti, da uvozniki glede na stopnjo dobička precej nad 15 % verjetno niso bili nenadno nesorazmerno prizadeti zaradi izoliranega učinka protidampinških dajatev.
This is all the more true as the market situation post June 2009 showed mixed signals with signs of improvement in some Member States.
To še toliko bolj drži, saj je stanje na trgu po juniju 2009 dajalo mešane vtise z znaki izboljšanja v nekaterih državah članicah.
Therefore, it is not apparent at this stage that the impact of the crisis has been seriously underestimated.
Zato se v tej fazi ne zdi, da bi bil učinek krize resno podcenjen.
It is moreover noted that by looking at the above data, the Commission went well beyond their legal obligations as Article 6(1) of the basic Regulation explicitly states that information relating to a period subsequent to the investigation period shall, normally, not be taken into account.
Poleg tega je treba poudariti, da je v zvezi z zgornjimi podatki Komisija bistveno presegla svoje pravne obveznosti, saj člen 6(1) osnovne uredbe izrecno določa, da se informacije v zvezi z obdobjem po obdobju preiskave običajno ne upoštevajo.
Lastly, some parties reiterated their claim that some product types should be excluded from the anti-dumping measures under Union interest aspects as there is only negligible production of notably sports and outdoor footwear left in the Union.
Nazadnje, nekatere stranke so ponovno trdile, da bi nekatere vrste izdelka bilo treba izvzeti iz protidampinških ukrepov zaradi interesa Unije, saj je proizvodnja športne obutve in obutve, ki ni hišna obutev, v Uniji zanemarljiva.
It was alleged that the decline in the Union production would constitute changed circumstance that have to be taken into consideration in the expiry review.
Trdilo se je, da bo upad proizvodnje v Uniji povzročil spremembo okoliščin, ki jo je treba upoštevati pri pregledu zaradi izteka.
It is firstly recalled that it is not possible to modify the scope of the measures in the framework of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation as stated in recital 61 of this Regulation.
Najprej je treba poudariti, da obsega ukrepov ni mogoče spremeniti v okviru pregleda zaradi izteka v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (61).
Even assuming that it would be legally possible, quod non, it is pointed out that this claim of decreasing production was already made in the original investigation and rebutted in recitals 28 and 38 of the definitive Regulation.
Tudi če bi to bilo s pravnega vidika mogoče, quod non, je treba poudariti, da je bila trditev o upadajoči proizvodnji izražena že med prvotno preiskavo in ovržena v uvodnih izjavah (28) in (38) končne uredbe.
As those parties did not submit any new substantiated evidence to demonstrate to what extent the Union production of those footwear types shrank in relation to the original investigation, the claim is rejected and the findings as described in recital 450 of this Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker navedene stranke niso predložile nobenih novih dokazov, s katerimi bi prikazale, koliko se je proizvodnja Unije navedenih vrst obutve zmanjšala v primerjavi s prvotno preiskavo, se trditev zavrne, potrdijo pa se ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (450) te uredbe.
INTEREST OF THE DISTRIBUTORS/RETAILERS
INTERES DISTRIBUTERJEV/TRGOVCEV NA DROBNO
One interested party claimed that the analysis distinguished artificially between importers and retailers and that the interest of integrated companies that have to shoulder the whole burden of the measures was not taken into consideration.
Ena zainteresirana stranka je trdila, da je z analizo prišlo do umetnega razlikovanja med uvozniki in trgovci na drobno in da interes integriranih družb, ki morajo nositi celotno breme ukrepov, ni bil upoštevan.
Firstly, it is noted that the only company which cooperated as a retailer was in fact an integrated importer/retailer, as indicated in recital 460 above, so the specificity of those integrated companies was represented both amongst the sampled importers and in the retailers’ analysis.
Prvič, treba je poudariti, da je samo ena družba, ki je sodelovala kot trgovec na drobno, dejansko integriran uvoznik/trgovec na drobno, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (460), tako da je bila specifičnost navedenih integriranih družb zastopana tako pri analizi vzorčenih uvoznikov kot trgovcev na drobno.
Secondly, all information provided by other retailers which did not fully cooperate in the investigation was also taken into account.
Drugič, upoštevane so bile vse informacije, ki so jih predložili drugi trgovci na drobno, ki niso polno sodelovali v preiskavi.
The Commission thus considered and analysed all available information on integrated companies.
Komisija je tako upoštevala in preučila vse razpoložljive informacije o integriranih družbah.
Considering the above, the claim that the interest of integrated companies had not been taken into account cannot be upheld.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se trditev, da interes integriranih družb ni bil upoštevan, zavrne.
Some interested parties expressed a general criticism claiming that the impact of the measure on retailers was not analysed in sufficient detail.
Nekaj zainteresiranih strank je izrazilo splošno kritiko in trdilo, da učinek ukrepa na trgovce na drobno ni bil dovolj podrobno preučen.
This claim was not substantiated.
Ta trditev ni bila utemeljena.
As described in recitals 459 et seqq., the Commission pro-actively and repeatedly tried to gather information from retailers but apart from one integrated importer/retailer that cooperated as an importer, no retail chain accepted to fully cooperate in the investigation.
Kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi (459) in naslednjih, je Komisija delovala proaktivno in večkrat skušala pridobiti informacije od trgovcev na drobno, vendar razen enega integriranega uvoznika/trgovca na drobno, nobena prodajna veriga ni želela polno sodelovati v preiskavi.
Despite the limited cooperation of retailers, the analysis considered, to the extent possible, all information available on the retail sector such as written submissions by interested parties, information provided in hearings, market intelligence, studies and specialized press.
Kljub omejenem sodelovanju trgovcev na drobno, so bile pri analizi, kolikor je bilo mogoče, upoštevane vse razpoložljive informacije o sektorju prodaje na drobno, kot so pisne pripombe zainteresiranih strank, informacije, pridobljene na zaslišanjih, podatki o trgu, študije in specializirani članki.
In view of the above, the claim that the impact of the measures on retailers was not analysed in sufficient detail must be rejected.
Glede na to je treba trditev, da učinek ukrepov na trgovce na drobno ni bil dovolj podrobno preučen, zavrniti.
A number of parties claimed that the Commission did not take into account publicly available information on retailer profitability.
Številne stranke so trdile, da Komisija ni upoštevala javno dostopnih informacij o dobičkonosnosti trgovcev na drobno.
One party argued that the profitability data collected from publicly available financial reports of major Union retailers shows a deeply worrying situation which the analysis has disregarded.
Ena stranka je trdila, da podatki o dobičkonosnosti, zbrani iz javno dostopnih finančnih poročil večjih trgovcev na drobno v Uniji, odražajo zelo zaskrbljujoče razmere, ki niso bile preučene.
In the same vein, some parties have considered that the severe effects of the economic crisis on the retail sector were not taken into account.
Prav tako so nekatere stranke menile, da zelo negativen učinek gospodarske krize na sektor prodaje na drobno ni bil upoštevan.
It was argued that although one of the largest shoe retail chains reported record profits in 2008, this is the exception to the rule and smaller retailers suffer severely.
Trdilo se je, da je poročanje ene največjih prodajnih verig za čevlje o rekordnem dobičku leta 2008 le izjema k pravilu ter da so manjši trgovci na drobno utrpeli veliko škodo.
In this respect, it is reiterated that there was very limited cooperation from retailers, as only one retailer/importer cooperated fully in the investigation.
V zvezi s tem je treba ponoviti, da je bilo sodelovanje trgovcev na drobno zelo omejeno, saj je samo en trgovec na drobno/uvoznik polno sodeloval v preiskavi.
Moreover, neither before nor after disclosure any specific information was submitted as regards the profit of retailers with regard to leather footwear or the product concerned.
Poleg tega niso bile niti pred razkritjem niti po razkritju predložene nobene posebne informacije glede dobička trgovcev na drobno v zvezi z usnjeno obutvijo ali zadevnim izdelkom.
In spite of this, the Commission took into account and analysed a variety of other sources of information such as submissions from retailers, market information, press reports which pointed to a wide variability of profits in the retail sector: whereas some retailers indeed appeared to have experienced decreasing margins and weakening demand, specialized press reported increasing sales and revenues for others.
Kljub temu je Komisija upoštevala in preučila različne druge vire informacij, kot so pisna mnenja trgovcev na drobno, informacije o trgu, poročila v tiskanih medijih, ki so kazali na raznolikost dobičkov v sektorju trgovine na drobno: medtem ko se zdi, da se je dobiček nekaterih trgovcev na drobno resnično zmanjševal, povpraševanje pa usihalo, so v specializiranih revijah poročali o povečevanju prodaje in dohodkov za druge.
Thus, the publicly available information referred to by the parties above was considered but proved to provide only a partial picture and therefore a variety of other information sources were used which indicated a wider spread of profits.
Javne dostopne informacije, ki jih omenjajo zgoraj navedene stranke, so torej bile upoštevane, vendar so dale le delno sliko, zaradi česar je bilo uporabljenih več različnih virov, ki so pokazali širšo porazdelitev dobička.
Consequently, the impact of the economic downturn on retailers has been analysed to the extent possible on the basis of information available.
Posledično je bil učinek gospodarske krize na trgovce na drobno preučen v obsegu, ki so ga omogočile razpoložljive informacije.
The claim that the profitability of retailers has not been correctly analysed must therefore be rejected.
Trditev, da dobičkonosnost trgovcev na drobno ni bila pravilno preučena, se zato zavrne.
Some parties objected to a reference to the general level of profitability of the retail sector and to a turnover achieved on other footwear as they consider this irrelevant for the investigation.
Nekatere stranke so nasprotovale sklicevanju na splošno stopnjo dobičkonosnosti sektorja trgovine na drobno in na prihodek od druge obutve, saj menijo, da to ni relevantno za preiskavo.
One party argued that if it was stated by the investigation authority that the effect of measures on retailers had been diluted by sales of other products, a similar analysis should have been made for Union producers.
Ena stranka je trdila, da če je preiskovalni organ izjavil, da je bil učinek ukrepov na trgovce na drobno oslabljen s prodajo drugih izdelkov, potem bi se morala podobna analiza opraviti tudi za proizvajalce Unije.
It is noted that retailers and Union producers of the like product are in a different situation insofar as they produce mainly leather footwear while retailers usually have a wider portfolio of other products.
Poudariti je treba, da so trgovci na drobno in proizvajalci Unije podobnega izdelka v različnih položajih, saj slednji proizvajajo zlasti usnjeno obutev, trgovci pa ponujajo širšo paleto drugih izdelkov.
The statements made in recitals 472 et seqq remain therefore valid.
Zato trditve v uvodni izjavi (472) in naslednjih še vedno veljajo.
Some parties questioned the accuracy of the employment figures of the retail sector and considered that more jobs were at stake without substantiating this argument.
Nekatere stranke so podvomile v pravilnost zaposlitvenih številk sektorja trgovine na drobno in menile, da je ogroženih več delovnih mest, vendar svojih pomislekov niso utemeljile.
In this respect, it is to be noted that the employment figure of the retail sector as indicated in recital 459 was calculated on the basis of the verified employment figure, related to the retail function and allocated to the product concerned, of the only cooperating importer/retailer.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da so bile zaposlitvene številke za sektor trgovine na drobno, kot so navedene v uvodni izjavi (459), izračunane na podlagi preverjenih zaposlitvenih številk edinega sodelujočega uvoznika/trgovca na drobno, povezanih s prodajo na drobno in dodeljenih zadevnemu izdelku.
An estimation was then made by extrapolating the above employment figure on the basis of the volumes retailed by this company as compared to total volumes of the product concerned retailed on the Union market.
Ocena je bila nato opravljena z ekstrapolacijo zgornjih zaposlitvenih številk na podlagi količine, ki jo je ta družba prodala na drobno, glede na celotno količino zadevnega izdelka, prodanega na drobno na trgu Unije.
This estimate was then cross-checked with submissions from other parties and with market intelligence sources which confirmed the order of magnitude established by the Commission.
Ta ocena je bila nato primerjana z informacijami, ki so jih predložile druge stranke, ter z viri podatkov o trgu, pri čemer je bila ocena Komisije potrjena.
The above argument is therefore rejected.
Ta trditev se zato zavrne.
It was argued by several parties that it was difficult for retailers to switch sources, in particular for SMEs, as they had long and trusted relationships and the expense of switching suppliers and the delays involved could be prohibitive.
Več strank je trdilo, da je za trgovce na drobno, zlasti MSP, zamenjava dobaviteljev težavna, saj z nekaterimi dobavitelji že dolgo poslovno sodelujejo in imajo odnos zaupanja, stroški zamenjave dobaviteljev in posledične zamude pa bi lahko bili pretirani.
Some parties argued that in the current economic downturn relocation costs were particularly hard to digest for retailers.
Nekatere stranke so trdile, da je za trgovce na drobno v trenutni gospodarski krizi posebno težko sprejeti stroške spremembe sedeža.
In this respect it is recognised that switching sources might cause some problems for some retailers in times of economic crisis.
V zvezi s tem se ugotavlja, da stroški zamenjave dobavitelja v času gospodarske krize lahko povzročijo težave nekaterim trgovcem na drobno.
However, the Commission did not find that the costs and the delays involved in switching sources of supply were prohibitive.
Vendar Komisija ni ugotovila, da bi bili stroški in zamude, povezani z zamenjavo dobavitelja, pretirani.
In fact, information gathered during the investigation suggested that several retailers had looked for alternative supplies and had switched without a disproportionally negative effect.
Pravzaprav informacije, pridobljene med preiskavo, kažejo, da je kar nekaj trgovcev na drobno iskalo druge dobavitelje in jih zamenjalo brez nesorazmernih negativnih učinkov.
The above argument cannot therefore be upheld.
Zato zgornje trditve ni mogoče sprejeti.
One party pointed out that the increased cost of leather footwear from the PRC and Vietnam, in addition to the measures, made it uncompetitive to continue sourcing from these countries.
Ena stranka je poudarila, da zaradi povečanih stroškov usnjene obutve iz Kitajske in Vietnama ter ukrepov dobavljanje iz teh držav ni več konkurenčno.
The argument that sourcing from the countries concerned is no longer competitive was not substantiated and does not seem to be compatible with the finding that imports from the countries concerned still have a combined market share of 28 % during the RIP.
Trditev, da dobavljanje iz zadevnih držav ni več konkurenčno, ni bila utemeljena in se ne zdi skladna z ugotovitvijo, da je imel uvoz iz zadevnih držav med OPP skupaj 28 % tržni delež.
Moreover, the allegation that there are other increasing costs in the countries concerned that have a bearing on sourcing decisions of importers confirms the finding of the Commission in recital 402 et seqq. that there seem to be other factors than the anti-dumping duty which have an impact on the decision of importers/retailers to switch supplies.
Poleg tega trditev, da so še drugi naraščajoci stroški v zadevnih državah, ki vplivajo na odločitve uvoznikov v zvezi z dobavljanjem, potrjuje ugotovitev Komisije v uvodni izjavi (402) in naslednjih, da so verjetno še drugi dejavniki razen protidampinške dajatve, ki vplivajo na odločitev uvoznikov/trgovcev na drobno glede zamenjave dobavitelja.
As there are many other factors in play, it is not possible to attribute all negative impact to the measures.
Ker so v igri še številni drugi dejavniki, vsega negativnega učinka ni mogoče pripisati ukrepom.
Several parties claimed that it had not been sufficiently considered that consumer price points prevented small price increases being passed on to consumers.
Več strank je trdilo, da se ni zadosti upoštevalo, da so cenovne točke preprečile prenos manjših zvišanj cen na potrošnike.
This statement in fact confirmed the finding of the Commission that the price increases to retailers were too small to be translated to any significant extent at consumer level.
Ta trditev je dejansko potrdila ugotovitev Komisije, da je bilo zvišanje cen za trgovce na drobno premajhno, da bi pomembno vplivalo na cene na ravni potrošnika.
In this respect reference is made to recital 477.
V zvezi s tem glej uvodno izjavo (477).
One party held that the analysis did not take into consideration the tough price battle in the retail sector.
Ena stranka je trdila, da pri analizi ni bila upoštevana močna cenovna bitka v sektorju trgovine na drobno.
This argument is rejected as the strong retail competition was considered in the analysis as described in recital 467.
Trditev se zavrne, saj je bila močna konkurenca med trgovci na drobno upoštevana pri analizi, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi (467).
INTEREST OF THE CONSUMERS
INTERES POTROŠNIKOV
Several parties argued that consumer price increases were higher than what was found in the investigation and, if the measures were extended, consumer prices would further increase.
Več strank je trdilo, da je zvišanje cen za potrošnike večje, kot je bilo ugotovljeno s preiskavo, in da se bodo cene še bolj zvišale, če bo veljavnost ukrepov podaljšana.
Others questioned the accuracy of the figures used by the Commission for consumer prices alleging that they did not cover all Member States and included other products than the product concerned.
Druge so podvomile v pravilnost številk, ki jih je Komisija uporabila za potrošniške cene, in trdile, da slednje niso zajemale vseh držav članic, hkrati pa vključevale še druge izdelke poleg zadevnega izdelka.