natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
When awarding contracts, the parties shall in all circumstances propose terms consistent with those of the framework agreement.
Stranke pri oddaji naročil v vseh okoliščinah predlagajo pogoje, skladne s pogoji iz okvirnega sporazuma.
Framework agreements may not be used improperly or in such a way as to prevent, restrict or distort competition.
Okvirni sporazumi se ne smejo uporabljati neustrezno ali tako, da preprečujejo, omejujejo ali izkrivljajo konkurenco.
For the award of subcontracts which have a value, excluding VAT, estimated to be less than the thresholds laid down in Article 8, successful tenderers apply the principles of the Treaty regarding transparency and competition.
Za oddajo naročil podizvajalcem, katerih vrednost brez DDV je ocenjena na manj, kot določajo pragovi iz člena 8, izbrani ponudniki uporabijo načela Pogodbe glede preglednosti in konkurenčnosti.
Article 9 shall apply to the calculation of the estimated value of subcontracts.
Za izračun ocenjene vrednosti naročil podizvajalcem se uporablja člen 9.
In the subcontract notice, the successful tenderer shall indicate the criteria for qualitative selection prescribed by the contracting authority/entity, as well as any other criteria it will apply for the qualitative selection of subcontractors.
V obvestilu o naročilu za podizvajalce izbrani ponudnik navede merila za priznanje sposobnosti, ki jih določi naročnik, ter vsa druga merila, ki jih bo uporabil za priznanje sposobnosti podizvajalcem.
All these criteria shall be objective, non-discriminatory and consistent with the criteria applied by the contracting authority/entity for the selection of the tenderers for the main contract.
Ta merila so nepristranska, nediskriminatorna in skladna z merili, ki jih je uporabil naročnik za izbiro ponudnikov za glavno naročilo.
The capabilities required must be directly related to the subject of the subcontract, and the levels of ability required must be commensurate with it.
Zahtevane sposobnosti morajo biti neposredno povezane s predmetom naročila za podizvajalce, zahtevane stopnje sposobnosti pa morajo biti temu primerne.
The successful tenderer shall not be required to subcontract if it proves to the satisfaction of the contracting authority/entity that none of the subcontractors participating in the competition or their proposed bids meet the criteria indicated in the subcontract notice and thereby would prevent the successful tenderer from fulfilling the requirements set out in the main contract.
Izbrani ponudnik ni obvezan k oddaji naročil za podizvajalce, če dokaže na način, ki je sprejemljiv za naročnika, da nobeden od podizvajalcev, ki so sodelovali na razpisu, oziroma nobena od njihovih predlaganih ponudb ne izpolnjuje meril, navedenih v obvestilu o naročilu za podizvajalce, in tako izbranemu ponudniku preprečuje izpolnitev zahtev iz glavnega naročila.
Where successful tenderers are contracting authorities/entities, they shall comply with the provisions on main contracts laid down in Titles I and II when they award subcontracts.
Če so izbrani ponudniki naročniki, pri oddaji naročil za podizvajalce upoštevajo določbe o glavnih naročilih iz naslovov I in II.
RULES TO BE APPLIED TO REVIEWS
PRAVILA, KI SE NAJ UPORABIJO ZA REVIZIJO
The review procedures provided for in this Title apply to the contracts referred to in Article 2, subject to the exceptions provided for in Articles 12 and 13.
Revizijski postopki, določeni v tem naslovu, veljajo za naročila iz člena 2, ob upoštevanju izjem iz členov 12 in 13.
Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that decisions taken by the contracting authorities/entities may be reviewed effectively and, in particular, as rapidly as possible in accordance with the conditions set out in Articles 56 to 62, on the grounds that such decisions have infringed Community law in the field of procurement or national rules transposing that law.
Države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, potrebne za zagotovitev učinkovite in zlasti čim hitrejše revizije odločitev naročnikov v skladu s pogoji, opredeljenimi v členih 56 do 62, na podlagi obrazložitve, da so takšne odločitve kršile bodisi pravo Skupnosti na področju naročil bodisi nacionalne predpise za izvajanje tega prava.
Member States shall ensure that there is no discrimination between undertakings claiming harm in the context of a procedure for the award of a contract as a result of the distinction made in this Title between national rules implementing Community law and other national rules.
Države članice zagotovijo, da ni diskriminacije med podjetji, ki trdijo, da so bila pri izvedbi postopka oddaje naročil oškodovana, zato ker ta naslov razlikuje med nacionalnimi predpisi, s katerimi se izvaja pravo Skupnosti, in drugimi nacionalnimi predpisi.
Member States shall ensure that review procedures are available, under detailed rules which Member States may establish, at least to any person having or having had an interest in obtaining a particular contract who has been or risks being harmed by an alleged infringement.
Države članice zagotovijo, da so revizijski postopki v skladu z natančnimi pravili, ki jih lahko določi država članica, na voljo vsaj vsem osebam, ki imajo ali so imele interes za pridobitev določenega naročila in ki jim je z domnevno kršitvijo nastala škoda ali bi jim lahko nastala škoda.
Member States may require that the person wishing to use a review procedure has notified the contracting authority/entity of the alleged infringement and of his intention to seek review, provided that this does not affect the standstill period in accordance with Article 57(2) or any other time-limits for applying for review in accordance with Article 59.
Države članice lahko zahtevajo, da oseba, ki želi uporabiti revizijski postopek, naročnika obvesti o domnevni kršitvi in o svoji nameri, da bo zahtevala revizijo, pod pogojem, da to ne vpliva na obdobje mirovanja v skladu s členom 57(2) oziroma katere koli druge časovne omejitve za vložitev zahtevka za revizijo v skladu s členom 59.
Member States may require that the person concerned first seek review with the contracting authority/entity.
Države članice lahko zahtevajo, da zadevna oseba zahtevo za revizijo najprej vloži pri naročniku.
Member States shall decide on the appropriate means of communication, including fax or electronic means, to be used for the application for review provided for in the first subparagraph.
Države članice določijo primeren način obveščanja, vključno s faksom ali elektronskimi komunikacijskimi sredstvi, ki se uporabi za zahtevek za revizijo iz prvega pododstavka.
The suspension referred to in the first subparagraph shall not end before the expiry of a period of at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contracting authority/entity has sent a reply if fax or electronic means are used, or, if other means of communication are used, before the expiry of either at least 15 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contracting authority/entity has sent a reply, or at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date of the receipt of a reply.
Začasna prekinitev iz prvega pododstavka se ne konča pred potekom roka, ki ne sme biti krajši od 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko je naročnik poslal svoj odgovor, če je za to uporabil faks ali elektronska komunikacijska sredstva, oziroma, če so bila uporabljena druga komunikacijska sredstva, pred potekom roka, ki ne sme biti krajši od 15 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko je naročnik poslal svoj odgovor, ali od roka 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu prejema odgovora.
Member States shall ensure that the measures taken concerning the review procedures specified in Article 55 include provision for powers:
Države članice zagotovijo, da sprejeti ukrepi v zvezi z revizijskimi postopki iz člena 55 vključujejo zagotovitev pooblastil:
to take, at the earliest opportunity and by way of interlocutory procedures, interim measures with the aim of correcting the alleged infringement or preventing further injury to the interests concerned, including measures to suspend or to ensure the suspension of the procedure for the award of a contract or the implementation of any decision taken by the contracting authority/entity, and to set aside or ensure the setting aside of decisions taken unlawfully, including the removal of discriminatory technical, economic or financial specifications in the invitation to tender, the contract documents or in any other document relating to the contract award procedure in question; or
zato, da bi kakor hitro mogoče in z vmesnim postopkom sprejeli prehodne ukrepe za odpravo domnevne kršitve ali za preprečitev nadaljnje škode za zadevne interese, vključno z ukrepi za začasno prekinitev ali zagotovitev začasne prekinitve postopka oddaje naročila ali izvajanja katere koli odločitve, ki jo je sprejel naročnik; in da se razveljavi ali zagotovi razveljavitev nezakonito sprejetih odločitev, vključno z odpravo diskriminacijskih tehničnih, ekonomskih ali finančnih specifikacij v povabilu k predložitvi ponudb, dokumentaciji o oddaji naročila ali v katerih koli drugih dokumentih, ki se nanašajo na zadevni postopek oddaje naročila; ali
to take, at the earliest opportunity, if possible by way of interlocutory procedures and if necessary by a final procedure on the substance, measures other than those provided for in point (a) with the aim of correcting any identified infringement and preventing injury to the interests concerned; in particular, making an order for the payment of a particular sum, in cases where the infringement has not been corrected or prevented.
zato, da bi kakor hitro mogoče, po možnosti z vmesnim postopkom in po potrebi v dokončnem postopku o zadevi, sprejeli ukrepe, ki niso predvideni v točki (a), za odpravo vseh ugotovljenih kršitev in za preprečitev škode za zadevne interese; zlasti zato, da bi lahko izdali nalog za plačilo določene vsote, če kršitev ni bila odpravljena ali preprečena.
In both the above cases, the powers provided for shall include the power to award damages to persons injured by the infringement.
V obeh zgornjih primerih podeljena pooblastila vključujejo pooblastilo za dodelitev nadomestila škode osebam, ki jim je bila s kršitvijo povzročena škoda.
The powers specified in paragraph 1 and Articles 60 and 61 may be conferred on separate bodies responsible for different aspects of the review procedure.
Pooblastila, navedena v odstavku 1 ter členih 60 in 61, se lahko prenesejo na ločene organe, ki so pristojni za različne vidike revizijskega postopka.
When a body of first instance, which is independent of the contracting authority/entity, reviews a contract award decision, Member States shall ensure that the contracting authority/entity cannot conclude the contract before the review body has made a decision on the application either for interim measures or for review.
Če prvostopenjski organ, ki je neodvisen od naročnika, opravi revizijo odločitve o oddaji naročila, države članice zagotovijo, da naročnik ne more skleniti pogodbe, dokler revizijski organ ne sprejme odločitve glede zahtevka za začasne ukrepe ali za revizijo.
The suspension shall end no earlier than the expiry of the standstill period referred to in Article 57(2) and Article 60(4) and (5).
Začasna prekinitev se ne konča pred potekom obdobja mirovanja iz člena 57(2) in člena 60(4) in (5).
Except where provided for in paragraph 3 of this Article and Article 55(6), review procedures need not necessarily have an automatic suspensive effect on the contract award procedures to which they relate.
Razen v primerih iz odstavka 3 tega člena in člena 55(6) ni nujno, da imajo revizijski postopki sami po sebi samodejni suspenzivni učinek na postopke oddaje naročila, na katere se nanašajo.
Member States may provide that the body responsible for review procedures may take into account the probable consequences of interim measures for all interests likely to be harmed, as well as the public interest, in particular defence and/or security interests, and may decide not to grant such measures when their negative consequences could exceed their benefits.
Države članice lahko določijo, da lahko organ, pristojen za revizijske postopke, upošteva verjetne posledice začasnih ukrepov za vse interese, ki se jim lahko povzroči škoda, in javni interes, zlasti obrambne in/ali varnostne interese, ter odloči, da takšnih ukrepov ne uvede, če obstaja možnost, da bi njihove negativne posledice presegale njihove prednosti.
A decision not to grant interim measures shall not prejudice any other claim of the person seeking such measures.
Odločitev o tem, da se začasni ukrepi ne uvedejo, ne posega v nobene druge pravice osebe, ki te ukrepe zahteva.
Member States may provide that where damages are claimed on the grounds that a decision was taken unlawfully, the contested decision must first be set aside by a body having the necessary powers.
Države članice lahko določijo, da mora organ s potrebnimi pooblastili, kadar se nadomestilo za škodo zahteva na podlagi protizakonito sprejete odločitve, najprej razveljaviti izpodbijano odločitev.
Except where provided for in Articles 60 to 62, the effects of the exercise of the powers referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article on a contract concluded subsequent to its award shall be determined by national law.
Razen v primerih, določenih v členih 60 do 62, se učinki izvajanja pooblastil iz odstavka 1 tega člena na pogodbo, ki se sklene po oddaji naročila, določijo v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo.
Furthermore, except where a decision must be set aside prior to the award of damages, a Member State may provide that, after the conclusion of a contract in accordance with Article 55(6), paragraph 3 of this Article or Articles 57 to 62, the powers of the body responsible for review procedures shall be limited to awarding damages to any person harmed by an infringement.
Poleg tega lahko država članica, razen kadar je treba odločitev razveljaviti pred dodelitvijo nadomestila za škodo, določi, da se po sklenitvi pogodbe v skladu s členom 55(6), odstavkom 3 tega člena ali členi 57 do 62, pooblastila organa, pristojnega za revizijske postopke, omejijo na dodelitev odškodnine vsem osebam, ki so bile oškodovane zaradi kršitve.
Where bodies responsible for review procedures are not judicial in character, written reasons for their decisions shall always be given.
Kadar organi, pristojni za revizijske postopke, po svoji naravi niso sodni, vedno navedejo pisne razloge za svoje odločitve.
Furthermore, in such a case, provision must be made to guarantee procedures whereby any allegedly illegal measure taken by the review body or any alleged defect in the exercise of the powers conferred on it can be the subject of judicial review or review by another body which is a court or tribunal within the meaning of Article 234 of the Treaty and independent of both the contracting authority/entity and the review body.
Poleg tega je v takem primeru treba določiti postopke, s katerimi je kakršen koli domnevno nezakoniti ukrep, ki ga sprejme revizijski organ, ali vsaka domnevna napaka pri izvrševanju dodeljenih pristojnosti lahko predmet sodnega postopka ali revizije drugega organa, ki je sodišče v smislu člena 234 Pogodbe ter neodvisen od naročnika in tudi od revizijskega organa.
At least the President of this independent body shall have the same legal and professional qualifications as members of the judiciary.
Vsaj predsednik tega neodvisnega organa ima enake pravne in strokovne kvalifikacije kot sodniki.
The decisions taken by the independent body shall, by means determined by each Member State, be legally binding.
Sklepi neodvisnega organa so pravno zavezujoči na načine, ki jih določi vsaka država članica.
Member States shall ensure that the bodies responsible for review procedures guarantee an adequate level of confidentiality of classified information or other information contained in the files transmitted by the parties, and act in conformity with defence and/or security interests throughout the procedure.
Države članice zagotovijo, da za revizijo pristojni organi jamčijo zadostno raven tajnosti zaupnih podatkov ali drugih podatkov v dosjejih, ki so jih posredovale stranke, ter da od začetka do konca postopka ravnajo v skladu z obrambnimi in/ali varnostnimi interesi.
To this end, Member States may decide that a specific body has sole jurisdiction for the review of contracts in the fields of defence and security.
V ta namen lahko države članice odločijo, da ima določen organ izključno pristojnost za revizijo naročil na področju obrambe in varnosti.
In any case, Member States may provide that only the members of review bodies personally authorised to deal with classified information may examine applications for review involving such information.
V vsakem primeru lahko države članice določijo, da lahko le člani revizijskih organov, ki so osebno pooblaščeni za ravnanje z zaupnimi podatki, pregledajo zahtevke za revizijo, ki vsebujejo takšne podatke.
They may also impose specific security measures concerning the registration of applications for review, the reception of documents and the storage of files.
Uvedejo lahko tudi določene varnostne ukrepe v zvezi z registracijo zahtevkov za revizijo, vložitvijo dokumentov in hrambo dosjejev.
Member States shall determine how review bodies are to reconcile the confidentiality of classified information with respect for the rights of the defence, and, in the case of a judicial review or of a review by a body which is a court or tribunal within the meaning of Article 234 of the Treaty, shall do so in such a way that the procedure complies, as a whole, with the right to a fair trial.
Države članice določijo, kako revizijski organi uskladijo tajnost zaupnih podatkov s spoštovanjem pravic obrambe, ter v primeru sodnega postopka ali revizije s strani organa, ki je sodišče v smislu člena 234 Pogodbe, to določijo tako, da je postopek v celoti skladen s pravico do pravičnega in poštenega sojenja.
Member States shall ensure that the persons referred to in Article 55(4) have sufficient time for effective review of the contract award decisions taken by contracting authorities/entities, by adopting the necessary provisions respecting the minimum conditions set out in paragraph 2 of this Article and in Article 59.
Države članice zagotovijo, da imajo osebe iz člena 55(4) na voljo primerne roke, ki jim omogočajo učinkovita pravna sredstva zoper odločitve naročnikov o oddaji naročila, in sicer tako, da sprejmejo potrebne določbe, ki upoštevajo minimalne pogoje, navedene v odstavku 2 tega člena in členu 59.
A contract may not be concluded following the decision to award a contract falling within the scope of this Directive before the expiry of a period of at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contract award decision is sent to the tenderers and candidates concerned if fax or electronic means are used or, if other means of communication are used, before the expiry of a period of either at least 15 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contract award decision is sent to the tenderers and candidates concerned or at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date of the receipt of the contract award decision.
Do sklenitve pogodbe, ki sledi odločitvi o oddaji naročila s področja uporabe te direktive, ne sme priti pred potekom roka, ki ne sme biti krajši od 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko se zadevnim ponudnikom in kandidatom po faksu ali po elektronskih komunikacijskih sredstvih pošlje odločitev o oddaji naročila oziroma, če so bila uporabljena druga komunikacijska sredstva, pred potekom roka, ki ne sme biti krajši od 15 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko je bilo zadevnim ponudnikom in kandidatom poslano obvestilo o odločitvi o oddaji naročila, ali od roka 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu prejema odločitve o oddaji naročila.
An exclusion is definitive if it has been notified to the tenderers concerned and either has been considered lawful by an independent review body or can no longer be subject to a review procedure.
Izključitev je dokončna, če je bil zadevni ponudnik o njej obveščen in jo neodvisni revizijski organ šteje za zakonito ali če izključitev ne more več biti predmet revizijskega postopka.
Candidates shall be deemed to be concerned if the contracting authority/entity has not made available information about the rejection of their application before the notification of the contract award decision to the tenderers concerned.
Zadevni kandidati so tisti, ki jim naročnik ni zagotovil informacij o zavrnitvi njihovih prošenj pred objavo odločitve o oddaji naročila zadevnim ponudnikom.
a summary of the relevant reasons as set out in Article 35(2), subject to Article 35(3), and,
povzetek ustreznih razlogov, navedenih v členu 35(2), ob upoštevanju določb člena 35(3), in
a precise statement of the exact standstill period applicable pursuant to the provisions of national law transposing this paragraph,
natančna navedba obdobja mirovanja, ki se uporablja na podlagi določb nacionalnega prava, ki prenašajo določbe iz tega odstavka.
Member States may provide that the periods referred to in Article 57(2) do not apply in the following cases:
Države članice lahko določijo, da se roki iz člena 57(2) ne uporabljajo v naslednjih primerih:
where this Directive does not require prior publication of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Union;
kadar ta direktiva ne zahteva predhodne objave obvestila o naročilu v Uradnem listu Evropske unije;
where the only tenderer concerned within the meaning of Article 57(2) is the one which is awarded the contract and there are no candidates concerned;
kadar je edini zadevni ponudnik v smislu člena 57(2) tisti ponudnik, ki mu je naročilo oddano, in to ne zadeva nobenega kandidata;
in the case of a contract based on a framework agreement as provided for in Article 29.
kadar gre za naročila, ki temeljijo na okvirnem sporazumu, kakor določa člen 29.
If this derogation is invoked, Member States shall ensure that the contract is ineffective in accordance with Articles 60 and 62 where:
Če se uporablja to odstopanje, države članice zagotovijo, da je pogodba v skladu s členoma 60 in 62 neveljavna, kadar:
there is an infringement of the second indent of the second subparagraph of Article 29(4), and,
gre za kršitve druge alinee drugega pododstavka člena 29(4), in
the contract value is estimated to be equal to or to exceed the thresholds set out in Article 8,
se ocenjuje, da je vrednost naročila enaka ali višja od pragov, navedenih v členu 8.
Where a Member State provides that any application for review of a decision of a contracting authority/entity taken in the context of, or in relation to, a contract award procedure falling within the scope of this Directive must be made before the expiry of a specified period, this period shall be at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the decision of the contracting authority/entity is sent to the tenderer or candidate if fax or electronic means are used or, if other means of communication are used, this period shall be either at least 15 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the decision of the contracting authority/entity is sent to the tenderer or candidate or at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date of the receipt of the decision of the contracting authority/entity.
Če države članice določijo, da je treba vse zahtevke za revizijo zoper naročnikovo odločitev, sprejeto v okviru ali v zvezi s postopkom oddaje naročila s področja uporabe te direktive, vložiti pred iztekom določenega roka, znaša ta rok vsaj 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko je bila ponudniku ali kandidatu po faksu ali elektronsko poslana naročnikova odločitev, oziroma, če se uporabijo druga komunikacijska sredstva, vsaj 15 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko je ponudniku ali kandidatu poslana naročnikova odločitev ali vsaj 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu prejema naročnikove odločitve.