natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This new paragraph 2, which was added to Article 124 of Law No 32/2000 to replace the existing paragraph that the Italian authorities had undertaken to amend (see recital 20), reads as follows:
V novem odstavku 2, ki je bil vstavljen v člen 124 zakona št. 32/2000 namesto obstoječega odstavka, ki so ga italijanski organi spremenili (glej uvodno izjavo 20), je določeno:
‘In compliance with Article 14 of Regulation (EEC) No 1035/72, the maximum amount of such aid shall be 5 % (for the first and second years), 4 % (for the third year), 3 % (for the fourth year) and 2 % (for the fifth year) of the value of the marketed production covered by the activity of the producers’ organisation.
„Taka pomoč bo v skladu s členom 14 Uredbe (EGS) št. 1035/72 obsegala največ 5 % (za prvo in drugo leto), 4 % (za tretje leto), 3 % (za četrto leto) in 2 % (za peto leto) vrednosti tržne proizvodnje, zajete v dejavnost organizacije proizvajalcev.
The amount of the aid may in no case exceed the organisation’s real establishment and administrative operation costs.
Znesek pomoči nikakor ne sme preseči dejanskih stroškov ustanovitve in upravnega delovanja organizacije.
No aid may be paid in respect of costs incurred after the fifth year or more than seven years after recognition.’
Izplačati ni mogoče nobene pomoči v zvezi s stroški, nastalimi po petem letu ali več kot sedem let po priznanju.“
In their letter received on 26 October 2005, the Italian authorities stated that Article 99(2)(a) of Law No 32/2000 had been repealed by Article 23 of Regional Law No 11 of 21 September 2005 and announced the withdrawal of the relevant notification.
Italijanski organi so v dopisu, ki ga je Komisija prejela 26. oktobra 2005, navedli, da je bil člen 99(2)(a) zakona št. 32/2000 razveljavljen s členom 23 regionalnega zakona št. 11 z dne 21. septembra 2005, in sporočili, da umikajo ustrezno priglasitev.
Under Article 87(1) of the Treaty, any aid granted by a Member State or through State resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods is, in so far as it affects trade between Member States, incompatible with the common market.
V členu 87(1) Pogodbe je določeno, da je vsaka pomoč, ki jo dodeli država članica, ali kakršna koli vrsta pomoči iz državnih sredstev, ki izkrivlja ali bi lahko izkrivljala konkurenco z dajanjem prednosti posameznim podjetjem ali proizvodnji posameznega blaga, nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom, kolikor prizadene trgovino med državami članicami.
The measures examined in the matter at hand fulfil this definition, in that they are financed from public resources, favour the production of certain goods (e.g. fruit and vegetables) and could affect trade given Italy’s position on those markets (in 2005, Italy produced 11443000 tonnes of fruit, excluding citrus fruit, making it the largest fruit producer in the European Union).
Ukrepi, ki se preučujejo v obravnavani zadevi, so skladni s tako opredelitvijo, saj se financirajo iz državnih sredstev, dajejo prednost proizvodnji posameznega blaga (na primer sadja in zelenjave) in bi glede na položaj Italije na teh trgih lahko prizadeli trgovino (v letu 2005 je Italija brez agrumov proizvedla 11443000 ton sadja in s tem zasedla mesto največjega proizvajalca sadja v Evropski uniji).
However, in cases covered by Article 87(2) and (3) of the Treaty, some measures may enjoy derogations and be considered compatible with the common market.
Vendar so za nekatere ukrepe iz primerov, vključenih v člen 87(2) in (3) Pogodbe, mogoča odstopanja ter jih lahko štejemo za združljive s skupnim trgom.
Taking account of the measures described above, the only possible derogation in the matter at hand is that laid down in Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty, according to which aid may be considered compatible with the common market if it is found to facilitate the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic areas, where such aid does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj opisanih ukrepov je v obravnavanem primeru mogoče uporabiti le odstopanje iz člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe, v katerem je določeno, da je mogoče kot združljivo s skupnim trgom šteti pomoč za pospeševanje razvoja določenih gospodarskih dejavnosti ali določenih gospodarskih območij, kadar takšna pomoč ne spreminja trgovinskih pogojev v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
The Commission notes, first of all, that Article 99(2)(a) of Law No 32/2000 was repealed without being applied (given the suspensive effect linked to initiation of the procedure under Article 88(2) of the Treaty) and that the Italian authorities have withdrawn the relevant notification.
Komisija nadalje ugotavlja, da je bil člen 99(2)(a) zakona št. 32/2000 razveljavljen, ne da bi bil kdaj uporabljen (glede na odložilni učinek, povezan z začetkom postopka iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe), in da so italijanski organi umaknili ustrezno priglasitev.
This renders superfluous any examination of the applicability of the provisions of the derogation provided for by Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty.
Zato je preučevanje upoštevnosti določb v zvezi z odstopanjem iz člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe odveč.
With regard to the aid under Article 124(1) and (2) of Law No 32/2000, the Commission notes that the procedures for granting the aid were brought into line with Regulation (EEC) No 1035/72, as amended by Article 3 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3284/83 of 14 November 1983 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1035/72 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables as regards producers’ organisations [14], by means of the provisions of the new paragraph 2 of Article 124 of Law No 32/2000, which was introduced by Article 12 of Law No 15/2004.
Komisija glede pomoči iz člena 124(1) in (2) zakona št. 32/2000 ugotavlja, da so bili postopki za dodelitev pomoči usklajeni z Uredbo (EGS) št. 1035/72, kot je bila spremenjena s členom 3 Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3284/83 z dne 14. novembra 1983 o spremembi Uredbe (EGS) št. 1035/72 o skupni ureditvi trga za sadje in zelenjavo [14], in sicer z določbami novega odstavka 2 člena 124 zakona št. 32/2000, ki je bil vstavljen s členom 12 zakona št. 15/2004.
As at the date of adoption of this law, aid to producers’ organisations was governed by Regulation (EC) No 2200/96.
Na datum sprejetja tega zakona je bila pomoč organizacijam proizvajalcev urejena z Uredbo (ES) št. 2200/96.
As indicated in recital 27, Article 53 of Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 lays down that any rights acquired by producers’ organisations prior to the entry into force of the Regulation, pursuant to Article 14 and Title IIa of Regulation (EEC) No 1035/72, are maintained until they are exhausted, provided that the conditions of Article 14 are met.
Kot je bilo navedeno v uvodni izjavi 27, se na podlagi člena 53 Uredbe (ES) št. 2200/96 vse pravice, ki so jih organizacije proizvajalcev pridobile pred začetkom veljavnosti navedene uredbe na podlagi člena 14 in naslova IIa Uredbe (EGS) št. 1035/72, ohranijo, dokler niso izčrpane, če so izpolnjeni vsi pogoji iz člena 14.
The provisions of the new Article 124(2) of Law No 32/2002, as introduced by Article 12 of Law No 15/2004, comply with the conditions of Article 14 and, in practice, ensure that any producers’ association that does not satisfy these conditions is excluded.
Določbe novega člena 124(2) zakona št. 32/2002, kot so bile vstavljene s členom 12 zakona št. 15/2004, se skladajo s pogoji iz člena 14 in v praksi zagotavljajo izključitev vseh organizacij proizvajalcev, ki ne izpolnjujejo teh pogojev.
Since, in Regulation (EEC) No 1035/72, the rules on State aid applied only within the limits set by the Council and the Regulation itself contained, in Article 14, a directly applicable provision that authorised the payment of national aid conditional upon compliance with certain conditions that were satisfied at the time, the national aid in question must no longer be subject to examination in the light of the rules applicable to State aid.
Ker so se v Uredbi (EGS) št. 1035/72 pravila glede državne pomoči uporabljala le v okviru, ki ga je določil Svet, in je ta uredba v členu 14 vsebovala določbo, ki se je uporabljala neposredno in s katero je bilo odobreno plačilo državne pomoči, če se je ta skladala z nekaterimi pogoji, ki so bili v danem trenutku izpolnjeni, zadevne državne pomoči ni mogoče več preučevati z vidika pravil, ki se uporabljajo za državno pomoč.
In consequence, the other doubts expressed by the Commission when the procedure was opened have also become redundant.
Zato so postali brezpredmetni tudi drugi dvomi, ki jih je izrazila Komisija ob začetku postopka.
Since Article 99(2)(a) of Law No 32/2000 has been repealed, the Commission does not need to rule on the compatibility with the common market of the aid provided for therein.
Ker je bil člen 99(2)(a) zakona št. 32/2000 razveljavljen, Komisiji ni treba odločati o tem, ali je pomoč, določena v tem členu, združljiva s skupnim trgom.
Accordingly, the procedure opened in relation to these provisions has become redundant and may be closed.
Zato je postal postopek, začet v zvezi s temi določbami, brezpredmeten in se lahko zaključi.
Given that Article 124(2) of Law No 32/2000, as amended by Article 12 of Law No 15/2004, brings the aid laid down for producers’ organisations into line with the provisions of Article 14 of Regulation (EEC) No 1035/72 and that, accordingly, such aid is considered automatically compatible with the rules governing the common organisation of the market and must no longer be subject to examination in the light of the rules applicable to State aid, the procedure opened in this connection has become redundant and may also be closed,
Ker je bila s členom 124(2) zakona št. 32/2000, kot je bil spremenjen s členom 12 zakona št. 15/2004, pomoč organizacijam proizvajalcev usklajena z določbami člena 14 Uredbe (EGS) št. 1035/72 ter se zato taka pomoč samodejno šteje za združljivo s pravili, ki se uporabljajo za skupno ureditev trga, in je torej ni več mogoče preučevati z vidika pravil, ki se uporabljajo za državno pomoč, je postal postopek, ki je bil začet v zvezi s tem, brezpredmeten in se prav tako lahko zaključi –
The procedure under Article 88(2) of the Treaty initiated in relation to the aid under Article 99(2)(a) (as regards the agriculture sector) of Sicilian Regional Law No 32 of 23 December 2000 is hereby closed owing to having become redundant, since Italy has withdrawn the notification.
Postopek na podlagi člena 88(2) Pogodbe, ki je bil začet v zvezi s pomočjo iz člena 99(2)(a) (glede kmetijskega sektorja) regionalnega zakona Sicilije št. 32 z dne 23. decembra 2000, se zaključi, ker je postal odvečen, saj je Italija umaknila priglasitev.
The procedure under Article 88(2) of the Treaty, which was initiated in relation to the aid under Article 124(1) and (2) (as amended) of Sicilian Regional Law No 32 of 23 December 2000 but which has become redundant, is hereby closed.
Postopek na podlagi člena 88(2) Pogodbe, ki je bil začet v zvezi s pomočjo iz člena 124(1) in (2) (kot je bil spremenjen) regionalnega zakona Sicilije št. 32 z dne 23. decembra 2000, vendar je postal odvečen, se zaključi.
Letter SG(2002) D/233133 of 18.12.2002.
Dopis SG (2002) D/233133 z dne 18. decembra 2002.
Letter SG-Greffe (2004) D/202440 of 21.6.2004.
Dopis SG-Greffe (2004) D/202440 z dne 21. junija 2004.
Letter SG-Greffe (2004) D/203974 of 10.9.2004.
Dopis SG-Greffe (2004) D/203974 z dne 10. septembra 2004.
However, the decision contains recommendations concerning this Article.
Vendar odločba vsebuje priporočila glede tega člena.
Article 124 of Law No 32/2000 also contained an aid measure in paragraph 3, but the Commission established that it was a national aid measure explicitly authorised by a Regulation establishing a common organisation of the market and that, as a result, it should not be examined any further.
Tudi člen 124(3) zakona št. 32/2000 je vseboval ukrep pomoči, vendar je Komisija ugotovila, da ga je treba opredeliti kot ukrep državne pomoči, izrecno dovoljen na podlagi Uredbe o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve trga, in ga zato ni mogoče še naprej preučevati.
OJ C 52, 2.3.2005, p. 23.
UL C 52, 2.3.2005, str. 23.
These provisions apply to both the agricultural and fishing sectors.
Te določbe se uporabljajo za kmetijski in ribiški sektor.
Reference is made only to the agriculture sector in the decision to initiate the procedure provided for by Article 88(2) of the Treaty and in this decision because, in the letter of 24 May 2005 referred to in recital 12, the Sicilian Fisheries Department stated that, at a later date, a separate notification would be made for the fishing sector.
V odločitvi o začetku postopka na podlagi člena 88(2) Pogodbe in v tej odločbi se obravnava le kmetijski sektor, saj je sicilski oddelek za ribištvo v dopisu z dne 24. maja 2005, navedenem v uvodni izjavi 12, pojasnil, da bo pozneje predložena ločena priglasitev za ribiški sektor.
These criteria are not set out in Article 99 but were notified in the additional information supplied by the Italian authorities.
Ta merila niso določena v členu 99, ampak so jih italijanski organi sporočili naknadno.
This approach had already been followed in relation to the aid provided for at national level for producers pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EEC) No 1035/72 – see aid dossier N 157/02, which was closed by letter SG(2001) D/288558 of 16.5.2001.
Tak pristop je bil uporabljen že v zvezi s pomočjo, določeno na državni ravni za proizvajalce v skladu s členom 14 Uredbe (EGS) št. 1035/72; glej dokumentacijo o pomoči N 157/2000, ki je bila zaključena z dopisom SG(2001) D/288558 z dne 16. maja 2001.
OJ L 325, 22.11.1983, p. 1.
UL L 325, 22.11.1983, str. 1.
By letter dated 13 August 2003, registered as received on 18 August 2003, the Italian Permanent Representation to the European Union sent the Commission the Italian authorities’ reply to the letter of 2 May 2003.
Stalno predstavništvo Italije pri Evropski uniji je z dopisom z dne 13. avgusta 2003, evidentiranim 18. avgusta 2003, Komisiji poslalo odgovor italijanskih organov na dopis z dne 2. maja 2003.
In this, the Italian authorities announced that Article 111 of Law No 32/2000 was being withdrawn and asked the Commission to adopt a separate decision for some of the articles of the Law.
V tem odgovoru so italijanski organi Komisijo obvestili o umiku člena 111 zakona št. 32/2000 in jo prosili, naj sprejme ločeno odločbo v zvezi z nekaterimi členi zadevnega zakona.
Council Decision 2010/156/CFSP
Sklep Sveta 2010/156/SZVP
of 16 March 2010
z dne 16. marca 2010
On 17 October 2005, the Council adopted Joint Action 2005/724/CFSP [1] appointing Mr Erwan FOUÉRÉ European Union Special Representative (EUSR) in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
Svet je 17. oktobra 2005 sprejel Skupni ukrep 2005/724/SZVP [1] o imenovanju g. Erwana FOUÉRÉJA za posebnega predstavnika Evropske unije (PPEU) v Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji.
On 15 September 2009, the Council adopted Joint Action 2009/706/CFSP [2] extending the mandate of the EUSR until 31 March 2010.
Svet je 15. septembra 2009 sprejel Skupni ukrep 2009/706/SZVP [2] o podaljšanju mandata PPEU do 31. marca 2010.
Policy objective
Politični cilji
The EUSR’s mandate shall be based on the policy objective of the European Union in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, which shall be to contribute to the consolidation of the peaceful political process and the full implementation of the Ohrid Framework Agreement, thereby facilitating further progress towards European integration through the Stabilisation and Association Process.
Mandat PPEU temelji na političnem cilju Evropske unije v Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji, to je prispevati k utrjevanju mirnega političnega procesa in izvajanju Ohridskega okvirnega sporazuma v celoti ter s tem omogočiti nadaljnji napredek v smeri evropskega združevanja prek stabilizacijskega in pridružitvenega procesa.
In order to achieve the policy objective, the mandate of the EUSR shall be to:
Da bi dosegel politične cilje, ima PPEU naslednje naloge:
offer the Union’s advice and facilitation in the political process;
nuditi nasvete in pomoč Unije v političnem procesu;
follow closely, and report on, security and inter-ethnic issues and liaise with all relevant bodies to that end;
budno spremljati vprašanja o varnosti in odnosih med etičnimi skupinami ter poročati o njih, v ta namen pa vzpostaviti stike z vsemi zadevnimi organi;
contribute to the development and consolidation of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, in accordance with EU human rights policy and EU guidelines on human rights.
sodelovati pri razvoju in utrjevanju spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin v Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji, in sicer v skladu s politiko in smernicami EU na področju človekovih pravic.
The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mandate of the EUSR in the period from 1 April 2010 to 31 August 2010 shall be EUR 340000.
Referenčni finančni znesek za kritje odhodkov, povezanih z nalogami PPEU, za obdobje od 1. aprila 2010 do 31. avgusta 2010 znaša 340000 EUR.
The salary of personnel who are seconded by a Member State or an institution of the Union to the EUSR shall be covered by the Member State or the institution of the Union concerned.
Plače osebja, ki ga PPEU začasno dodeli država članica ali institucija Unije, krije zadevna država članica ali zadevna institucija Unije.
All seconded personnel shall remain under the administrative authority of the sending Member State or Union institution and shall carry out their duties and act in the interest of the mandate of the EUSR.
Vse začasno dodeljeno osebje ostane pod upravno pristojnostjo države članice ali institucije Unije, ki ga pošilja, ter opravlja svoje obveznosti in ravna v interesu mandata PPEU.
The privileges, immunities and further guarantees necessary for the completion and smooth functioning of the mission of the EUSR and the members of his staff shall be agreed with the host party/parties as appropriate.
Po potrebi se o privilegijih, imunitetah in dodatnih jamstvih, potrebnih za izpolnitev in tekoče izvajanje misije PPEU ter članov njegovega osebja, sklene dogovor s pogodbenico gostiteljico oziroma pogodbenicami gostiteljicami.
In accordance with the Union’s policy on the security of personnel deployed outside the Union in an operational capacity under Title V of the Treaty, the EUSR shall take all reasonably practicable measures, in conformity with his mandate and the security situation in his geographical area of responsibility, for the security of all personnel under his direct authority, notably by:
V skladu s politiko Unije o varnosti osebja, ki je v okviru operativnih zmogljivosti iz naslova V Pogodbe razporejeno zunaj Unije, PPEU v skladu s svojimi nalogami in z varnostnimi razmerami na geografskem območju, za katerega je zadolžen, sprejme vse ukrepe za varnost vsega osebja v njegovi neposredni pristojnosti, ki so v razumnih mejah izvedljivi, zlasti tako, da:
The EUSR shall promote overall Union political coordination.
PPEU se zavzema za splošno politično usklajevanje na ravni Unije.
The activities of the EUSR shall be coordinated with those of the Commission, as well as those of other EUSRs active in the region as appropriate.
Dejavnosti PPEU so po potrebi usklajene z dejavnostmi Komisije, pa tudi z dejavnostmi drugih PPEU, ki delujejo v tej regiji.
The implementation of this Decision and its consistency with other contributions from the Union to the region shall be kept under regular review.
Izvajanje tega sklepa in njegova skladnost z drugimi prispevki Unije za zadevno območje se redno preverjata.
The EUSR shall present the HR, the Council and the Commission with a comprehensive mandate implementation report at the end of the mandate.
Ob izteku mandata PPEU predloži VP, Svetu in Komisiji izčrpno poročilo o izvedbi nalog.
Done at Brussels, 16 March 2010.
V Bruslju, 16. marca 2010
OJ L 244, 16.9.2009, p. 25.
UL L 244, 16.9.2009, str. 25.
However, the mandate of the EUSR may be terminated earlier, if the Council so decides, on a recommendation of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR) following the entry into force of the decision establishing the European External Action Service,
Mandat PPEU pa vendar lahko predčasno preneha, če tako odloči Svet na priporočilo visokega predstavnika Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko (VP) po začetku veljavnosti sklepa o ustanovitvi Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje –
The mandate of Mr Erwan FOUÉRÉ as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is hereby extended until 31 August 2010.
Erwanu FOUÉRÉJU se mandat posebnega predstavnika Evropske unije (PPEU) v Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji podaljša do 31. avgusta 2010.
The expenditure financed by the amount stipulated in paragraph 1 shall be eligible as from 1 April 2010.
Odhodki, ki se financirajo iz zneska, določenega v odstavku 1, so upravičeni od 1. aprila 2010.
(notified under document C(2010) 1314)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 1314)
Decision 2006/502/EC was adopted in accordance with the provisions of Article 13 of Directive 2001/95/EC, which restricts the validity of the Decision to a period not exceeding 1 year, but allows it to be confirmed for additional periods none of which shall exceed 1 year.
Odločba 2006/502/ES je bila sprejeta v skladu z določbami člena 13 Direktive 2001/95/ES, ki omejuje veljavnost Odločbe na največ eno leto, a dopušča njeno podaljšanje za dodatna obdobja, ki pa nikoli ne smejo biti daljša od enega leta.
Decision 2006/502/EC was amended three times, firstly by Decision 2007/231/EC [3] which prolonged the validity of the Decision until 11 May 2008, secondly by Decision 2008/322/EC [4] which prolonged the validity of the Decision until 11 May 2009 and thirdly by Decision 2009/298/EC [5] which prolonged the validity of the Decision for a further year until 11 May 2010.
Odločba 2006/502/ES je bila spremenjena trikrat, prvič z Odločbo 2007/231/ES [3], ki je podaljšala veljavnost Odločbe do 11. maja 2008, drugič z Odločbo 2008/322/ES [4], ki je podaljšala veljavnost Odločbe do 11. maja 2009, in tretjič z Odločbo 2009/298/ES [5], ki je podaljšala veljavnost Odločbe za nadaljnje leto do 11. maja 2010.
In Article 6 of Decision 2006/502/EC, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:
V členu 6 Odločbe 2006/502/ES se odstavek 2 nadomesti z naslednjim:
This Decision shall apply until 11 May 2011.’
Ta odločba se uporablja do 11. maja 2011.“
Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with this Decision by 11 May 2010 at the latest and shall publish those measures.
Države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, potrebne za uskladitev s tem sklepom, najpozneje do 11. maja 2010 in jih objavijo.
concerning certain interim protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N1 in poultry in Romania
o nekaterih začasnih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi z visoko patogeno aviarno influenco podtipa H5N1 pri perutnini v Romuniji
(notified under document C(2010) 1862)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 1862)
Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza [4] sets out measures for the control of both the low pathogenic and highly pathogenic forms of avian influenza.
Direktiva 2005/94/ES z dne 20. decembra 2005 o ukrepih Skupnosti za obvladovanje aviarne influence [4] določa ukrepe za nadzor nizko patogene in visoko patogene aviarne influence.