natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Guard band between broadcasting band edge at 790 MHz and FDD downlink band edge [5]
Zaščitni pas med radiodifuzijskim robom pasu pri 790 MHz in robu pasu pri navzdolnji povezavi [5]
Guard band between broadcasting band edge at 790 MHz and TDD band edge
Zaščitni pas med radiodifuzijskim robom pasu pri 790 MHz in robu pasu TDD
Guard band between FDD downlink band edge and FDD uplink band edge (duplex gap) [6]
Zaščitni pas med radiodifuzijskim robom pasu in robom pasu pri navzgornji povezavi FDD (dupleksni razmik) [6]
Guard band between FDD downlink band edge and TDD band edge
Zaščitni pas med robom pasu pri navzdolnji povezavi FDD in robom pasu TDD
Guard band between FDD uplink band edge and TDD band edge
Zaščitni pas med robom pasu pri navzgornji povezavi in robom pasu TDD
Baseline requirements — BS BEM out-of-block EIRP limits over frequencies below 790 MHz
Osnovne zahteve – Omejitve EIRP zunaj bloka BEM baznih postaj prek frekvenc pod 790 MHz
Condition on base station in-block EIRP, P
Pogoj za EIRP znotraj bloka bazne postaje
For TV channels where broadcasting is protected
Za televizijske programe z zaščiteno radiodifuzijo
For TV channels where broadcasting is subject to an intermediate level of protection
Za televizijske programe s srednjo stopnjo zaščite
For TV channels where broadcasting is not protected
Za televizijske programe brez zaščitene radiodifuzije
Cases A, B, and C listed in Table 4 can be applied per broadcasting channel and/or per region so that the same broadcasting channel may have different levels of protection in different geographic areas and different broadcasting channels may have different levels of protection in the same geographic area.
Primeri A, B in C iz tabele 4 se lahko uporabljajo za radiodifuzijski program in/ali za območje, tako da ima lahko isti radiodifuzijski program v različnih geografskih območjih različne stopnje zaščite, različni radiodifuzijski programi pa imajo lahko v istem geografskem območju različne stopnje zaščite.
Member States shall apply the baseline requirement in case A in circumstances where digital terrestrial broadcasting channels are in use at the time of deployment of terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services.
Države članice upoštevajo osnovne zahteve v primeru A, če se ob uvedbi prizemnih sistemov, ki lahko zagotavljajo elektronske komunikacijske storitve, uporabljajo prizemni radiodifuzijski programi.
Member States may apply the baseline requirements in cases A, B or C in circumstances where the relevant broadcasting channels are not in use at the time of deployment of terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services.
Države članice upoštevajo osnovne zahteve v primerih A, B ali C, če se ob uvedbi prizemnih sistemov, ki lahko zagotavljajo elektronske komunikacijske storitve, ustrezni prizemni radiodifuzijski programi ne uporabljajo.
They shall take into account that cases A and B reserve the option of bringing relevant broadcasting channels into use for digital terrestrial broadcasting at a future date, while case C is appropriate where there are no plans to bring the relevant broadcasting channels into use.
Pri tem upoštevajo, da primera A in B dopuščata možnost, da se bodo lahko ustrezni radiodifuzijski programi začeli uporabljati pozneje, medtem ko v primeru C uporaba ustreznih radiodifuzijskih programov ni načrtovana.
Technical conditions for FDD or TDD terminal stations (TS)
Tehnični pogoji za terminalske postaje FDD ali TDD
In-block requirements — TS BEM in-block emission limit over frequencies of FDD uplink and TDD
Zahteve znotraj bloka – Omejitev oddajanja znotraj bloka BEM terminalske postaje prek frekvenc navzgornje povezave FDD in TDD
Maximum mean in-block power
Najvišja srednja moč znotraj bloka
Member States may relax the limit in Table 5 for specific deployments, e.g. fixed terminal stations in rural areas, provided that protection of other services, networks and applications is not compromised and cross-border obligations are fulfilled.
Države članice lahko sprostijo omejitev iz tabele 5 za določene uporabe, npr. fiksne terminalske postaje v podeželskih območjih, če s tem ne prizadenejo zaščite drugih storitev, omrežij in naprav in če so izpolnjene obveznosti, nastale s čezmejnim sodelovanjem.
TRP is a measure of how much power the antenna actually radiates.
TRP je mera za dejansko moč sevanja antene.
The TRP is defined as the integral of the power transmitted in different directions over the entire radiation sphere.
Opredeljen je kot integral moči, oddane v različne smeri v celotnem območju sevanja.
The actual measurement bandwidth of the measurement equipment used for purposes of compliance testing may be smaller than the measurement bandwidth provided in the tables.
Pasovna širina merilne frekvence opreme, uporabljene za merjenje, je lahko manjša od pasovne širine merilne frekvence iz zgornjih tabel.
For one to four antennas.
Za eno do štiri antene.
790 MHz to 791 MHz for the frequency arrangement described in Part A(1).
790 MHz do 791 MHz za frekvenčne ureditve iz dela A(1).
821 MHz to 832 MHz for the frequency arrangement described in Part A(1).
821 MHz do 832 MHz za frekvenčne ureditve iz dela A(1).
This power limit is specified as EIRP for terminal stations designed to be fixed or installed and as TRP for terminal stations designed to be mobile or nomadic.
Ta omejitev moči je določena kot EIRP za fiksne in vgrajene terminalske postaje ter kot TRP za mobilne ali nomadske terminalske postaje.
EIRP and TRP are equivalent for isotropic antennas.
EIRP in TRP sta enaki za izotropne antene.
It is recognised that this value is subject to a tolerance of up to + 2 dB, to take account of operation under extreme environmental conditions and production spread.
Za to vrednost velja toleranca do + 2 dB, da se upoštevata obratovanje pod izjemnimi okoljskimi pogoji in razpršitev.
The Commission Communication ‘Transforming the digital dividend into social benefits and economic growth’ [2] stressed the importance of coherent opening of the 790-862 MHz band (the ‘800 MHz band’) for electronic communications services by adopting technical conditions of use.
Komisija je v sporočilu z naslovom „Kako digitalno dividendo pretvoriti v družbeno korist in gospodarsko rast“ [2] poudarila, da je pomembno, da se skladno odprtje pasu 790-862 MHz (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pas 800 MHz) za elektronske komunikacijske storitve zagotovi tako, da se sprejmejo tehnični pogoji za uporabo.
The 800 MHz band is part of the digital dividend, i.e. radio frequencies that are freed up as a result of more efficient spectrum use through the switchover from analogue to digital terrestrial TV.
Pas 800 MHz je del digitalne dividende, tj. radijskih frekvenc, ki so sproščene zaradi učinkovitejše rabe spektra s prehodom z analogne na digitalno prizemno televizijo.
Noting the strong impact of broadband communications on growth, the Economic Recovery Plan [4] has set a target of 100 % broadband coverage by between 2010 and 2013 [5].
Zaradi velikega vpliva širokopasovnih komunikacij na rast je bil v načrtu za oživitev gospodarstva [4] določen cilj 100-odstotne širokopasovne pokritosti do leta 2010 oziroma leta 2013 [5].
This cannot be achieved without a significant role being played by wireless infrastructures, including in the provision of broadband to rural areas, part of which can be done by giving early access to the digital dividend to the benefit of such areas.
Če brezžična infrastruktura pri tem ne bo imela pomembne vloge, vključno pri zagotavljanju širokopasovnih povezav v podeželskih območjih, kar se lahko deloma zagotovi s pravočasnim dostopom do digitalne dividende v korist takih območij, tega ne bo mogoče doseči.
the assigned block sizes shall be in multiples of 5 MHz;
Dodeljeni bloki so večkratniki 5 MHz.
10 to – 5 MHz from lower block edge– block EIRP limits per antenna [3]over frequencies of FDD downlink and TDD
10 do – 5 MHz od spodnjega roba bloka– ka BEM baznih postaj na anteno prek frekvenc [3]navzdolnje povezave FDD ali TDD
5 to 0 MHz from lower block edge– e
5 do 0 MHz od spodnjega roba bloka– a
the duplex mode of operation shall be FDD with the following arrangements. The duplex spacing shall be 41 MHz with base station transmission (down link) located in the lower part of the band starting at 791 MHz and finishing at 821 MHz and terminal station transmission (up link) located in the upper part of the band starting at 832 MHz and finishing at 862 MHz.
Dupleksni način obratovanja je FDD z naslednjo ureditvijo: Dupleksni razmik znaša 41 MHz, pri čemer se oddajanje bazne postaje (navzdolnja povezava) v spodnjem delu pasu začne pri 791 MHz in konča pri 821 MHz, oddajanje terminalske postaje (navzgornja povezava) v zgornjem delu pa se začne pri 832 MHz in konča pri 862 MHz.
concerning the aid awarded for Farm Dairy Flevoland (C 45/08)
o pomoči za Farm Dairy C 45/08
(notified under document C(2010) 1240)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 1240)
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) [1], and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) [1] in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 108(2) te pogodbe,
After having, in accordance with this article, invited the interested parties to present their observations and having regard to these observations,
po pozivu zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo pripombe v skladu s tem členom, in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
I. Procedure
I. Postopek
When examining a fact sheet sent in relation to an application for exemption based on Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid [2], the Commission came across information regarding aid granted or to be granted to Farm Dairy Flevoland.
Ob pregledu podatkov, ki so bili poslani v okviru zahtevka za izvzetje na podlagi Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 68/2001 z dne 12. januarja 2001 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES pri pomoči za usposabljanje [2], je Komisija pridobila informacije o pomoči, ki je bila ali bi bila dodeljena podjetju Farm Dairy Flevoland.
By letter of 29 June 2004 (ref. AGR/16887), the Commission asked the Netherlands for information on this measure.
Z dopisom z dne 29. junija 2004 (ref. AGR/16887) je Komisija Nizozemsko zaprosila za informacije o tem ukrepu.
The Dutch authorities replied by letter of 28 November 2005, registered as received on 29 November 2005.
Nizozemski organi so odgovorili z dopisom z dne 28. novembra 2005, evidentiranim 29. novembra 2005.
By letter of 22 May 2007 the Commission asked for further information; the Netherlands replied by letter of 22 June 2007, registered as received on 25 June 2007.
Z dopisom z dne 22. maja 2007 je Komisija zaprosila za dodatne informacije; Nizozemska je odgovorila z dopisom z dne 22. junija 2007, evidentiranim 25. junija 2007.
The measure was entered in the register of unnotified aid under number NN 97/05.
Ukrep je bil vpisan v register nepriglašenih pomoči pod številko NN 97/05.
The Commission decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure was taken on 26 November 2008 and published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3].
Odločitev Komisije, da začne postopek, je bila sprejeta 26. novembra 2008 in objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3].
The Commission called on the other Member States and interested third parties to submit their comments on the aid in question.
Komisija je ostale države članice in zainteresirane tretje strani pozvala, naj predložijo pripombe o zadevnih pomočeh.
The Netherlands sent their comments by letter dated 19 January 2009, registered on the same day.
Nizozemska je pripombe poslala z dopisom z dne 19. januarja 2009, evidentiranim istega dne.
Farm Dairy sent the Commission its observations as an interested third party by letter of 18 May 2009.
Komisija je pripombe Farm Dairy kot zainteresirane tretje strani prejela z dopisom z dne 18. maja 2009.
The Commission asked the Netherlands some additional questions by letter dated 18 September 2009.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 18. septembra 2009 Nizozemski postavila dodatna vprašanja.
Background of the measure
Okoliščine ukrepa
Farm Dairy manufactures dairy products.
Farm Dairy je podjetje za proizvodnjo mlečnih izdelkov.
It moved to its current location in Lelystad, Flevoland, which is a region classified as objective No 1.
Preselilo se je na sedanjo lokacijo v Lelystadu v pokrajini Flevoland, ki je zajeta v Cilju 1.
On 24 August 1998 Farm Dairy applied for investment aid pursuant to point 3.3 of the Flevoland Province SPD (Single Programming Document or ‘Enig Programmeringsdocument’).
Farm Dairy je 24. avgusta 1998 zaprosil za pomoč za naložbe v skladu s točko 3.3 enotnega programskega dokumenta (EPD) pokrajine Flevoland.
The company intended to create both direct and indirect jobs in the region.
Ob ustanovitvi podjetja je bilo predvideno, da bo ustvarilo neposredna in posredna delovna mesta v regiji.
On 23 September 1998, the Province gave a favourable opinion to this application for aid.
Pokrajina je 23. septembra 1998 dala ugodno mnenje za zahtevek za pomoč.
In this decision, the Province based itself, inter alia on the favourable outlook in terms of job creation, environment, reduction of milk transport costs (up to then the milk produced in Flevoland was processed outside of Flevoland and even as far away as Belgium) and the company’s prospects of profitability.
Pri svoji odločitvi se je med drugim oprla na dobre možnosti za ustvarjanje delovnih mest, koristi za okolje, znižanje stroškov prevoza mleka (do tedaj se je mleko, proizvedeno v Flevolandu, predelovalo zunaj pokrajine in celo v Belgiji) in predvideno donosnost podjetja.
Farm Dairy anticipated having contracts with the milk producers of Flevoland and agreements with a well-known supermarket chain, which would ensure the sale of the dairy products.
Farm Dairy je namreč nameraval skleniti pogodbe s proizvajalci mleka v Flevolandu in ugledno verigo veleblagovnic, kar bi zagotovilo prodajo mlečnih izdelkov.
Farm Dairy planned to handle 48 million kilos of milk a year.
Farm Dairy je predvideval, da bo letno predelal 48 milijonov kilogramov mleka.
The Province applied to the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture [Ministerie voor Landbouw, Natuur and Voedselkwaliteit — LNV] for co-financing and an assessment of the project.
Pokrajina je na ministrstvu za kmetijstvo (Ministerie voor Landbouw, Natuur and Voedselkwaliteit, LNV) vložila zahtevek za sofinanciranje in zahtevek za oceno projekta.
There seemed to have been a difference of opinions between the Province and the ‘Directie Noordwest’ of the Ministry of Agriculture concerning the application for co-financing, in particular with regard to the innovative character of the project.
Mnenji pokrajine in ministrstva LNV o zahtevku za sofinanciranje sta se razhajali zlasti v zvezi z inovativnostjo projekta.
For this reason, IKC gave a second opinion.
Zato je IKC izdal drugo mnenje.
This second opinion, issued on 17 December 1998, noted the project’s qualities with regard to employment, outlets and profitability.
V tem drugem mnenju, predloženem 17. decembra 1998, so kot dobre strani projekta navedeni zaposlovanje, prodajne možnosti in rentabilnost.
However, it concluded that the innovative character of the project was poor.
Vendar je v tem mnenju presojeno, da projekt ni zelo inovativen.
The production process itself was not innovative, although it used the most advanced techniques, but the project contained market innovations.
Proizvodni postopek sam po sebi namreč ni bil inovativen, čeprav je uporabljal najnovejšo tehnologijo, zato pa je projekt vseboval tržne inovacije.
This second opinion took several criteria into consideration, such as the development of the region and the financial outlook for the project.
To drugo mnenje upošteva več meril, kot na primer razvoj regije in finančne obete projekta.
In view of the fact that the project would be particularly beneficial at provincial level (and less at national level), the usual scale for distributing the co-financing of subsidies was revised downwards, which meant that the provincial quota share was increased.
Ker bo projekt koristil predvsem pokrajini (in manj državi kot celoti), je bil običajni porazdelitveni ključ za sofinanciranje nepovratnih sredstev spremenjen tako, da se je delež pokrajine povečal.
In view of this position adopted by the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, the Province issued a decision granting Farm Dairy a total amount of NLG 1575000 (EUR 715909), informing Farm Dairy on 3 March 1999 of its intention to provide this grant.
Po odločitvi LNV je pokrajina izdala odločbo, s katero Farm Dairy dodeljuje nepovratna sredstva v skupni višini 1575000 NLG (tj. 715909 EUR), in podjetju Farm Dairy sporočila, da mu bo nepovratna sredstva dodelila 3. marca 1999.
The grant was to be financed by contributions from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), the central Government and the Province.
Nepovratna sredstva bi se financirala iz prispevkov Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (EKUJS), države in pokrajine.
Following doubts concerning the possibilities of obtaining authorisation for the aid from the European Commission, the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture decided not to grant the public financing, informing the Province of this by letter of 14 September 1999.
LNV se je zaradi dvoma, ali bo Evropska komisija odobrila pomoč, odločil, da ne dodeli javnih sredstev, in to sporočil pokrajini v dopisu z dne 14. septembra 1999.
DG Agriculture conducted an inspection and decided that the project could not be financed via the SPD, and that consequently the part of the financing to come from the EAGGF would not be granted.
Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo je po opravljenem pregledu odločil, da se projekt ne more financirati na podlagi EPD in da zato ne bo dodeljen delež sredstev iz EKUJS.
It informed the Province of this decision by letter of 25 June 1999.
Komisija je pokrajini to odločitev sporočila v dopisu z dne 25. junija 1999.
The Province nevertheless decided to finance the project exclusively out of its own funds.
Pokrajina se je vseeno odločila, da bo projekt financirala izključno iz pokrajinskih sredstev.
Farm Dairy was informed of the final award and payment of the aid by letter of 20 November 2000.
Farm Dairy je bil z dopisom z dne 20. novembra 2000 obveščen o dokončni dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev in njihovem izplačilu.
On 23 February 2001 an informal meeting was held between DG Agriculture officials and representatives of Flevoland Province, at the latter’s request.
Na pobudo pokrajine Flevoland so se njeni predstavniki 23. februarja 2001 neuradno sestali z uradniki GD za kmetijstvo.
At this meeting the officials pointed out that the aid to Farm Dairy was not compatible with the common market and would have to be recovered or allocated to another project.
Na srečanju so uradniki pojasnili, da Farm Dairy ni upravičen do pomoči, zato jo mora vrniti, da se sredstva lahko porabijo za kak drug projekt.
The Province decided to grant the aid in the form of compensation to Farm Dairy for the damage suffered as a result of the withdrawal of the decision granting the aid.
Pokrajina se je odločila, da bo podjetju Farm Dairy dodelila pomoč v obliki odškodnine zaradi preklica odločitve o dodelitvi pomoči.
The compensation was equal to the amount which Farm Dairy would have received if the aid had been authorised.
Višina odškodnine je bila enaka znesku, ki bi ga Farm Dairy prejel, če bi bila pomoč odobrena.
The Province estimated that as the award decision did not provide for the possibility of the aid being withdrawn, it was bound by this decision and obliged to award the aid, or risk Farm Dairy taking legal action against it.
Ker odločba o dodelitvi ni določala možnosti preklica pomoči, je pokrajina namreč ocenila, da jo ta odločba zavezuje in da mora dodeliti pomoč, sicer lahko Farm Dairy proti njej sproži sodni postopek.
Originally, the aid had been awarded under the SPD for Flevoland Province as aid for investment under point 3.3 of the SPD.
Sprva je bila pomoč dodeljena v okviru EPD pokrajine Flevoland kot pomoč za naložbe na podlagi točke 3.3 EPD.
Subsequently, and for the reasons explained above, the aid was granted as compensation for the losses suffered as a result of the decision to withdraw the granting of the aid.
Nato je bila iz zgoraj navedenih razlogov pomoč dodeljena kot nadomestilo za izgubo zaradi odločitve o preklicu dodelitve pomoči.
The aid amounts to NLG 1575000 or EUR 715909. This amount corresponds to 8,5 % of the amount of the total investments, namely NLG 18597000 or EUR 8438951.
Pomoč znaša 1575000 NLG ali 715909 EUR. To je 8,5 % vseh naložb, ki znašajo 18597000 NLG ali 8438951 EUR.
The beneficiary is Farm Dairy Holding B.V. situated in Lelystad.
Upravičenec je Farm Dairy Holding B.V. iz Lelystada.
This is a company which produces dairy products (including yoghurts and other milk-based desserts).
To je podjetje za proizvodnjo mlečnih izdelkov (tj. jogurtov in drugih mlečnih sladic).
The aid was awarded for the period from 1 October 1998 to 1 May 2000, corresponding to the start and end dates of the Farm Dairy project.
Pomoč je bila dodeljena za obdobje od 1. oktobra 1998 do 1. maja 2000, ki se ujema z začetkom in koncem projekta Farm Dairy.
The award decision as such was taken on 3 March 1999.
Odločba o dodelitvi je bila sprejeta 3. marca 1999.
The Commission initiated the investigation procedure provided for under Article 108(2) of the TFEU because it had serious doubts as to the compatibility of this aid with the internal market.
Komisija je sprožila postopek pregleda iz člena 108(2) PDEU, ker je resno dvomila v združljivost teh pomoči z notranjim trgom.
In particular, the Commission has, in a preliminary fashion, examined the compatibility of the measures in question from the perspective of aid for investment and aid for compensation of damage.
Komisija je predhodno zlasti proučila združljivost zadevnih ukrepov z vidika pomoči za naložbe in nadomestila za škodo.
In the case of the aid for investment, the Commission applied the rules applicable at the time of granting the aid, i.e. the guidelines for State aid in connection with investments in the processing and marketing of agricultural products [4] (hereinafter ‘the guidelines’), given that it related to an investment.
Glede pomoči za naložbe je Komisija uporabila pravila, ki so veljala ob dodelitvi, tj. okvir za državno pomoč za naložbe v sektorju predelave in trženja kmetijskih proizvodov [4] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: okvir), ker je šlo za naložbo.
These guidelines exclude, in a general way, aid for investment in the sector of cow’s milk and products of this milk, except in the case of one of the exceptions referred to in point 2.3 of the Annex to Commission Decision 94/173/EC of 22 March 1994 on the selection criteria to be adopted for investments for improving the processing and marketing conditions for agricultural and forestry products [5].
Ta okvir na splošno izključuje pomoči za naložbe v sektorju kravjega mleka in izdelkov iz tega mleka, razen za izjeme iz točke 2.3 Priloge k Odločbi Komisije 94/173/ES z dne 22. marca 1994 o merilih izbora za naložbe za izboljšanje pogojev predelave in trženja kmetijskih in gozdnih proizvodov [5].
These exceptions include investments with a major innovative element.
Te izjeme med drugim zadevajo naložbe z velikim deležem inovacij.
In this regard, in the decision to open the investigation procedure, the Commission concluded that there were not enough elements to be able to conclude that the aid in question met the conditions to benefit from one of the exceptions.
V zvezi s tem je Komisija v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka ugotovila, da nima dovolj podatkov za sklep, da zadevna pomoč izpolnjuje pogoje za uveljavljanje ene od predvidenih izjem.
Point 3 d) of the guidelines provides for the possibility of declaring certain aid compatible if it is eligible for co-financing.
Točka 3(d) okvira pa določa, da je nekatere pomoči mogoče razglasiti za združljive, če so upravičene do sofinanciranja.