natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Two cooperating users were concerned about the negative impact that measures could have both on competition and on stimulating innovative solutions but no concrete evidence was provided that could substantiate this claim.
Dva sodelujoča uporabnika sta bila zaskrbljena zaradi negativnega vpliva, ki bi ga ukrepi lahko imeli na konkurenco in spodbujanje inovativnih rešitev, vendar nista predložila nobenih konkretnih dokazov za podkrepitev te trditve.
In this respect it should also be noted that any imposition of anti-dumping measures aims at correcting unfair trade practices and not halting competition.
V zvezi s tem je treba tudi poudariti, da je cilj kakršne koli uvedbe protidampinških ukrepov popraviti nepoštene trgovinske prakse, ne pa ovirati konkurenco.
Furthermore, the number of players involved in this particular market and the type of products produced (‘know-how intensive’) ensure that innovation will remain one of the most important priorities of the market players.
Poleg tega število akterjev, udeleženih na zadevnem trgu, in vrsta proizvedenih izdelkov („ki zahtevajo veliko znanja in izkušenj“) zagotavljata, da bodo inovacije še naprej ena najpomembnejših prednostnih nalog akterjev na trgu.
The main general concern of Community users is that measures might have a negative impact on their budgets and increase the cost of investment by Customs administrations.
Uporabnike Skupnosti na splošno predvsem skrbi, da bi ukrepi negativno vplivali na njihove proračune in zvišali stroške naložb carinskih uprav.
However some users report that any customs-related procedures and, thus, any anti-dumping duties should be born by the seller of the product concerned.
Vendar nekateri uporabniki poročajo, da mora za kakršne koli postopke, povezane s carino, in tako kakršne koli protidampinške dajatve poskrbeti prodajalec zadevnega izdelka.
This could constitute absorption pursuant to Article 12 of the basic Regulation.
To bi lahko pomenilo absorpcijo v skladu s členom 12 osnovne uredbe.
In any event, the overall share of the product concerned in the users’ budget would be low.
Vsekakor bi bil celotni delež zadevnega izdelka v proračunu uporabnikov majhen.
Furthermore, the product concerned is considered as a fixed asset investment because of its long useful life period (normally more than 10 years).
Poleg tega zadevni izdelek zaradi dolge življenjske dobe (običajno več kot 10 let) velja za naložbo v osnovna sredstva.
Thus, any anti-dumping duties paid should be spread over the useful life of the cargo scanner.
Tako se kakršne koli plačane protidampinške dajatve razdelijo po življenjski dobi pregledovalnika tovora.
The investigation has not shown any evidence suggesting that measures would have an impact on the activities of users or on the number of staff operating this type of systems, on customs personnel or on personnel responsible for any ancillary services.
Preiskava ni pokazala nobenih dokazov, da bi ukrepi vplivali na dejavnosti uporabnikov oziroma število osebja, ki upravlja to vrsto sistemov, carinskega osebja ali osebja, odgovornega za kakršne koli pomožne storitve.
It was also argued that public authorities within the EU abide by strict public procurement rules which ensure transparent selection procedures.
Navedeno je bilo tudi, da javni organi v EU spoštujejo stroga pravila javnega naročanja, ki zagotavljajo preglednost izbirnih postopkov.
To this extent it should be noted that public procurement procedures are not designed to counteract dumping practices.
Glede tega je treba poudariti, da postopki javnih naročil niso namenjeni boju proti dampinškim praksam.
To the contrary, the existence of an indeed transparent market makes evident any attempt of unfair trade practices and enforces the need to correct the level playing field in the market.
Nasprotno, na resnično preglednem trgu je jasno viden vsak poskus nepoštenih trgovinskih praks, hkrati pa se krepi potreba po vzpostavitvi enotnih trgovskih pogojev.
The Community industry would clearly be in a position to benefit from any measures by increased economies of scale because of an increase in production and sales.
Industrija Skupnosti bi nedvomno uživala ugodnosti kakršnih koli ukrepov zaradi povečane ekonomije obsega kot posledice večje proizvodnje in prodaje.
Account taken of the above, it is considered that, under the current circumstances, the imposition of measures against the PRC will not affect the Community users significantly.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega velja, da v trenutnih okoliščinah uvedba ukrepov proti LRK ne bo znatno vplivala na uporabnike Skupnosti.
Having examined the various interests involved, it is provisionally concluded that, from an overall Community interest perspective, no interest outweighs the Community industry’s interest to provisionally impose measures with the aim to eliminate trade distorting effects resulting from dumped imports.
Po proučitvi različnih vključenih interesov se začasno sklene, da z vidika splošnega interesa Skupnosti noben interes ne prevladuje nad interesom industrije Skupnosti za začasno uvedbo ukrepov, da bi odpravili izkrivljajoče učinke trgovanja, ki so posledica dampinškega uvoza.
In view of the conclusions reached above with regard to dumping, resulting injury and Community interest, provisional measures on imports of the product concerned from the PRC should be imposed in order to prevent further injury being caused to the Community industry by dumped imports.
Ob upoštevanju sklepnih ugotovitev v zvezi z dampingom, posledično škodo in interesom Skupnosti je treba uvesti začasne ukrepe, da se prepreči, da bi dampinški uvoz še naprej povzročal škodo industriji Skupnosti.
The level of the provisional anti-dumping measures should be sufficient to eliminate the injury to the Community industry caused by the dumped imports, without exceeding the dumping margins found.
Stopnja začasnih protidampinških ukrepov mora zadoščati za odpravo škode, ki jo je industriji Skupnosti povzročil dampinški uvoz, ne da bi presegla ugotovljeno stopnjo dampinga.
When calculating the amount of duty necessary to remove the effects of the injurious dumping, it was considered that any measures should allow the Community industry to cover its costs and obtain a profit before tax that could be reasonably achieved under normal conditions of competition, i.e. in the absence of dumped imports.
Pri izračunu zneska dajatve, potrebne za odpravo učinkov škodljivega dampinga, je bilo upoštevano, da morajo ukrepi industriji Skupnosti omogočati, da pokrije svoje stroške in pred obdavčitvijo skupno doseže dobiček, ki bi bil lahko razumno dosežen v običajnih konkurenčnih razmerah, tj. če dampinškega uvoza ne bi bilo.
The pre-tax profit margin used for this calculation was in the range of 12 to 16 % (exact figure can not be disclosed for reasons of confidentiality) of turnover.
Stopnja dobička pred obdavčitvijo, uporabljena za ta izračun, je bila v razponu od 12 do 16 % (točnega podatka zaradi zaupnosti ni mogoče razkriti) prometa.
It was demonstrated that this was the profit level that could reasonably be expected in the absence of injurious dumping since this type of profit margins rests in line with what the Community industry was able to achieve before the appearance of Chinese imports into the Community.
Pokazalo se je, da bi to stopnjo dobička lahko razumno pričakovali, če ne bi bilo škodljivega dampinga, saj je ta vrsta stopnje dobička v skladu s tistim, ki ga je bila industrija Skupnosti zmožna doseči pred pojavom kitajskega uvoza v Skupnosti.
On this basis, a non-injurious price was calculated for the Community industry of the like product.
Na tej podlagi je bila izračunana neškodljiva cena za industrijo Skupnosti, ki proizvaja podobni izdelek.
The non-injurious price has been obtained by adding the above mentioned profit margin to the cost of production.
Neškodljiva cena je bila določena tako, da se je stroškom proizvodnje prištela zgoraj navedena stopnja dobička.
The necessary price increase was then determined on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average import price, as established for the undercutting calculations, with the average non-injurious price of products sold by the Community industry on the Community market.
Potrebno zvišanje cen je bilo potem določeno na podlagi primerjave med tehtano povprečno uvozno ceno, kakor je bila določena za izračun nelojalnega nižanja cen, in povprečno neškodljivo ceno izdelkov, ki jih je industrija Skupnosti prodajala na trgu Skupnosti.
Any difference resulting from this comparison was then expressed as a percentage of the average import CIF value.
Razlika, ki izhaja iz te primerjave, je bila potem izražena kot delež povprečne uvozne vrednosti CIF.
This difference was for the sole Chinese cooperating exporting producer above the dumping margin found.
Ta razlika je bila za edinega kitajskega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika nad ugotovljeno stopnjo dampinga.
In the light of the foregoing, and in accordance with Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation, it is considered that the provisional anti-dumping measures should be imposed on imports originating in the PRC at the level of the dumping margin found.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno in v skladu s členom 7(2) osnovne uredbe se šteje, da je treba za uvoz s poreklom iz LRK uvesti začasne protidampinške ukrepe na ravni ugotovljene stopnje dampinga.
On the basis of the above, the rate of the provisional anti-dumping duty for the PRC is 36,6 %.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je stopnja začasne protidampinške dajatve za LRK 36,6 %.
It recalled that the market in the European Union is governed mainly by public tendering processes with a rather small market size and number of players involved it.
Spomniti je treba, da se trg v Evropski uniji upravlja predvsem s postopki javnih razpisov, njegov obseg je precej majhen, malo pa je tudi udeležencev na njem.
Thus, for reasons of enhanced transparency and careful monitoring of the effectiveness of the measures, it is considered appropriate to request the relevant authorities of the Member States to provide to the Commission on a confidential and periodic basis information concerning awards of tenders.
Zaradi večje preglednosti in skrbnega spremljanja učinkovitosti ukrepov se tako šteje za primerno od ustreznih organov držav članic zahtevati, da Komisiji zaupno in redno zagotavljajo informacije o dodelitvi naročil.
In the interest of sound administration, a period should be fixed within which the interested parties which made themselves known within the time limit specified in the notice of initiation may make their views known in writing and request a hearing.
Zaradi dobrega upravljanja bi bilo treba opredeliti obdobje, v katerem lahko zainteresirane strani, ki so se javile v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku, v pisni obliki izrazijo stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
Furthermore, it should be stated that the findings concerning the imposition of duties made for the purposes of this Regulation are provisional and may have to be reconsidered for the purpose of any definitive duty,
Poleg tega je treba navesti, da so sklepi v zvezi z uvedbo dajatev za namene te uredbe začasni in jih je mogoče znova proučiti za namen katere koli dokončne dajatve –
A provisional anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on systems for scanning of cargo, based on the use of neutron technology or based on the use of X-rays with an X-ray source of 250 KeV or more or based on the use of alpha, beta or gamma radiations, currently falling within CN codes ex90221900, ex90222900, ex90278017 and ex90301000 (TARIC codes 9022190010, 9022290010, 9027801710 and 9030100091) and motor vehicles equipped with such systems currently falling within CN code ex87059090 (TARIC code 8705909010) originating in the People’s Republic of China.
Uvede se začasna protidampinška dajatev za sisteme za preglede tovora z uporabo nevtronske tehnologije ali rentgenskih žarkov z virom rentgenskega sevanja najmanj 250 KeV ali z uporabo alfa, beta ali gama žarkov, uvrščene v oznake KN ex90221900, ex90222900, ex90278017 in ex90301000 (oznake TARIC 9022190010, 9022290010, 9027801710 in 9030100091), ter motorna vozila, opremljena s takimi sistemi, uvrščenimi v oznako KN ex87059090 (oznaka TARIC 8705909010), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
The rate of the provisional anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-European Union-frontier price, before duty, of the products described in paragraph 1 shall be 36,6 %.
Stopnja začasne protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko meja Evropske unije pred plačilom dajatve, za izdelke iz odstavka 1 je 36,6 %.
The release for free circulation in the European Union of the product referred to in paragraph 1 shall be subject to the provision of a security equivalent to the amount of the provisional duty.
Sprostitev izdelka iz odstavka 1 v prosti promet v Evropski uniji je predmet varščine, ki je enaka znesku začasne dajatve.
Without prejudice to Article 20 of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96, interested parties may request disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which this Regulation was adopted, make their views known in writing and apply to be heard orally by the Commission within one month of the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Brez poseganja v člen 20 Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 lahko zainteresirane strani v enem mesecu od začetka veljavnosti te uredbe zahtevajo razkritje bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta ta uredba, ter v pisni obliki izrazijo svoja stališča in prosijo za ustno zaslišanje pred Komisijo.
Pursuant to Article 21(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96, the parties concerned may comment on the application of this Regulation within one month of the date of its entry into force.
V skladu s členom 21(4) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 lahko zadevne strani predložijo pripombe glede uporabe te uredbe v enem mesecu od datuma njenega začetka veljavnosti.
OJ C 63, 18.3.2009, p. 20.
UL C 63, 18.3.2009, str. 20.
in the case of wholly or partly foreign owned firms or joint ventures, exporters are free to repatriate capital and profits;
v primeru družb ali skupnih družb, ki so v celoti ali deloma v tuji lasti, lahko izvozniki svobodno vrnejo kapital in dobičke v domovino;
export prices and quantities, and conditions and terms of sale are freely determined;
izvozne cene in količine ter prodajni pogoji so svobodno določeni;
Index: 2004=100
Indeks: 2004 = 100
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1243/2009
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1243/2009
amending Regulation (EU) No 1231/2009 fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 December 2009
o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 1231/2009 o določitvi uvoznih dajatev v sektorju žit od 16. decembra 2009
The import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 December 2009 were fixed by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1231/2009 [3].
Uvozne dajatve v sektorju žit, ki se uporabljajo od 16. decembra 2009, so bile določene z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 1231/2009 [3].
As the average of the import duties calculated differs by more than EUR 5/tonne from that fixed, a corresponding adjustment must be made to the import duties fixed by Regulation (EU) No 1231/2009.
Ker izračunano povprečje uvoznih dajatev za 5 EUR/t odstopa od določene dajatve, je potrebna prilagoditev uvoznih dajatev, določenih v Uredbi (EU) št. 1231/2009.
Regulation (EU) No 1231/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Uredbo (EU) št. 1231/2009 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Annexes I and II to Regulation (EU) No 1231/2009 are hereby replaced by the text in the Annex to this Regulation.
Prilogi I in II k Uredbi (EU) št. 1231/2009 se nadomestita z besedilom iz prilog k tej uredbi.
It shall apply from 17 December 2009.
Uporablja se od 17. decembra 2009.
OJ L 330, 16.12.2009, p. 65.
UL L 330, 16.12.2009, str. 65.
Import duties on the products referred to in Article 136(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 applicable from 17 December 2009
Uvozne dajatve za proizvode iz člena 136(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007, ki se uporabljajo od 17. decembra 2009
Council Regulation (EC) No 1244/2009
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1244/2009
The composition of the lists of third countries in Annexes I and II to Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 [2] should be, and should remain, consistent with the criteria laid down in recital 5 thereto.
Sestava seznamov tretjih držav v prilogah I in II k Uredbi (ES) št. 539/2001 [2] bi morala biti in ostati še naprej skladna z merili iz uvodne izjave 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 539/2001.
Some third countries, for which the situation has changed as regards these criteria, should be transferred from one Annex to the other.
Nekatere tretje države, v zvezi s katerimi so se razmere glede teh meril spremenile, bi bilo treba prenesti iz ene priloge v drugo.
With five Western Balkan countries — Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia — Visa Facilitation Agreements entered into force on 1 January 2008, as a first concrete step forward along the path set out by the Thessaloniki agenda towards a visa-free travel regime for the citizens of Western Balkan countries.
Sporazumi o poenostavitvi vizumskih postopkov s petimi državami Zahodnega Balkana – Albanijo, Bosno in Hercegovino, Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Črno goro in Srbijo – so začeli veljati 1. januarja 2008, kar je bil prvi konkreten korak na poti, določeni v Solunski agendi glede režima potovanj brez vizumov za državljane držav Zahodnega Balkana.
With each of these countries, a visa liberalisation dialogue was opened in 2008 and roadmaps for visa liberalisation have been established.
Z vsako od teh držav se je leta 2008 začel dialog o liberalizaciji vizumskega režima in določeni so bili časovni načrti za liberalizacijo tega režima.
In its assessment of the implementation of the roadmaps of May 2009, the Commission considered that the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia had met all the benchmarks set out in its roadmap and, in its assessment of November 2009, that Montenegro and Serbia also meet all the benchmarks set out in their respective roadmaps.
Komisija je maja 2009 v oceni izvajanja časovnih načrtov menila, da Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija izpolnjuje vsa merila iz časovnega načrta, v svoji oceni iz maja 2009 pa, da tudi Črna gora in Srbija izpolnjujeta vsa merila iz svojih časovnih načrtov.
Therefore the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia should be transferred to Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 539/2001.
Zato bi bilo treba Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Črno goro in Srbijo prenesti v Prilogo II k Uredbi (ES) št. 539/2001.
The visa requirement exemption should only apply to holders of biometric passports issued by each of the three countries concerned.
Izvzetje iz vizumske obveznosti bi se moralo uporabljati le za imetnike biometričnih potnih listov, ki jih izda vsaka od treh zadevnih držav.
For persons residing in Kosovo as defined by the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 of 10 June 1999 (referred to as Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)) and persons whose citizenship certificate has been issued for the territory of Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a specific Coordination Directorate in Belgrade will be in charge of collecting their passport applications and the issuance of passports.
Kar zadeva osebe, ki prebivajo na Kosovu, kot je opredeljen v Resoluciji Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov 1244 z dne 10. junija 1999 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Kosovo (RVSZN 1244)), in osebe, katerih potrdilo o državljanstvu je bilo izdano za ozemlje Kosova (RVSZN 1244), bo za zbiranje njihovih vlog za potne liste in izdajanje potnih listov pristojen poseben usklajevalni urad v Beogradu.
However, in view of security concerns regarding in particular the potential for illegal migration, the holders of Serbian passports issued by that specific Coordination Directorate should be excluded from the visa-free regime for Serbia.
Vendar pa bi zaradi vprašanja varnosti zlasti glede možnosti nezakonite migracije morali biti imetniki srbskih potnih listov, ki jih izda ta posebni usklajevalni urad, izključeni iz brezvizumskega režima za Srbijo.
For reasons of legal clarity and security, and in accordance with Article 1(3) of Regulation (EC) No 539/2001, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) should be added to Annex I to that Regulation.
Zaradi pravne jasnosti in varnosti ter v skladu s členom 1(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 539/2001 bi bilo treba Kosovo (RVSZN 1244) dodati v Prilogo I k navedeni uredbi.
This is without prejudice to the status of Kosovo (UNSCR 1244).
To ne vpliva na status Kosova (RVSZN 1244).
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Regulation constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded between the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters’ association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [3] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point B, of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of that Agreement [4].
Ta uredba predstavlja za Islandijo in Norveško razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško o pridružitvi obeh k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [3], ki sodijo na področje točke B člena 1 Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES z dne 17. maja 1999 o nekaterih izvedbenih predpisih za uporabo tega sporazuma [4].
As regards Switzerland, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [5], which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point B, of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 4(1) of Decision 2008/146/EC [6].
Ta uredba predstavlja za Švico razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [5], ki sodijo na področje iz točke B člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES, v povezavi s členom 4(1) Sklepa 2008/146/ES [6].
As regards Liechtenstein, this Regulation constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point B, of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Decision 2008/261/EC [7].
Ta uredba predstavlja za Lihtenštajn razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Protokola med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda, ki sodijo na področje iz točke B člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES v povezavi s členom 3 Sklepa 2008/261/ES [7].
This Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [8].
Ta uredba predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, pri katerem Združeno kraljestvo ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/365/ES z dne 29. maja 2000 o prošnji Združenega kraljestva Velika Britanija in Severna Irska za sodelovanje pri nekaterih določbah schengenskega pravnega reda [8].