natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission shall use the amounts referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph of this paragraph as a basis for fixing the ceiling of the Member States concerned for each of the direct payments referred to in Articles 52 and 53 as provided for in paragraph 2 of this Article.’;
Komisija uporabi zneske iz točke (a) prvega pododstavka tega odstavka kot podlago za določitev zgornje meje za zadevno državo članico, kar zadeva vsako neposredno plačilo iz členov 52 in 53, kot je določeno v odstavku 2 tega člena.“;
the following subparagraphs are added to Article 64(2):
v členu 64(2) se dodajo naslednji pododstavki:
‘By way of derogation from the third subparagraph, where a farmer of the sector concerned does not hold any payment entitlement but declares a number of leased payment entitlements in the first year of integration of the coupled support, he shall be allocated a number of payment entitlements corresponding to the difference between the number of eligible hectares he declares and the number of leased payment entitlements he declares.
„Z odstopanjem od tretjega pododstavka, če kmet v zadevnem sektorju nima nobene pravice do plačila in kljub temu prijavi več zakupljenih pravic do plačila v prvem letu vključitve shem vezane podpore, se mu dodeli število pravic do plačila, ki ustreza razliki med številom upravičenih hektarjev, ki jih prijavi, in številu zakupljenih pravic do plačila, ki jih prijavi.
The value of the entitlements allocated shall be established by dividing the amount resulting from the application of paragraph 1 by the number of entitlements to be allocated.
Vrednost dodeljenih pravic se določi z delitvijo zneska, ki izhaja iz uporabe odstavka 1, s številom pravic, ki se morajo dodeliti.
However, the value of each entitlement allocated shall not exceed EUR 5000.
Vendar pa vrednost posamezne dodeljene pravice ne presega 5000 EUR.
In order to ensure the full allocation of the amount resulting from the application of paragraph 1 after application of the fourth subparagraph of this paragraph, the farmer of the sector concerned shall be allocated payment entitlements of a maximum value per entitlement of EUR 5000. By way of derogation from Article 35, these payment entitlements shall give right to an annual support under the single payment scheme without declaration of the corresponding hectares.
Da bi zagotovili celotno dodelitev zneska, ki izhaja iz uporabe odstavka 1, po uporabi četrtega pododstavka tega odstavka, se kmetu iz zadevnega sektorja dodelijo pravice do plačila z največjo vrednostjo posamezne pravice v višini 5000 EUR. Z odstopanjem od člena 35 te pravice do plačila daje pravico do letne pomoči v okviru sheme enotnega plačila brez prijavljanja ustreznega števila hektarjev.
However, the number of payment entitlements activated by use of this derogation shall in a given year not exceed the number of payment entitlements activated by the farmer in accordance with Article 35.
Število pravic do plačila, uveljavljenih z uporabo odstopanja, pa v danem letu ne preseže števila pravic do plačila, ki jih kmet uveljavi v skladu s členom 35.
This derogation shall cease to apply from the first year where, and to the extent to which, the farmer of the sector concerned declares sufficient eligible hectares for activation of the payment entitlements or part thereof in accordance with Article 35.
To odstopanje se preneha uporabljati od prvega leta, če in kolikor kmet iz zadevnega sektorja prijavi zadostno število upravičenih hektarjev za uveljavitev pravic do plačila ali dela pravic do plačila v skladu s členom 35.
Those payment entitlements shall be activated on the available eligible hectares before any payment entitlements are transferred to the farmer, after the allocation of payment entitlement in accordance with the first sentence of this subparagraph.
Navedene pravice do plačila se uveljavijo na razpoložljivih upravičenih hektarjih, preden se kmetu prenesejo kakršne koli pravice do plačila po dodelitvi pravice do plačila v skladu s prvim stavkom tega pododstavka.
In the case of transfer of the payment entitlements resulting from the fifth subparagraph of this paragraph, other than by actual or anticipated inheritance or as a consequence to change in legal status, Article 35 shall apply where the transferee activates those payment entitlements.’;
Pri prenosu pravic do plačila na podlagi petega pododstavka tega odstavka, razen na podlagi dejanske ali pričakovane dediščine ali kot posledica spremembe pravnega statusa, se uporablja člen 35, če prevzemnik uveljavi navedene pravice do plačila.“;
in Article 67, the current text becomes paragraph 1 and the following paragraph is added:
v členu 67 sedanje besedilo postane odstavek 1, doda pa se naslednji odstavek:
Member States having made use only in some parts of their territory of the option provided for in Section 1 of Chapter 5 of Title III of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 to apply the single payment scheme at regional level may apply this Article at the same regional level.
Države članice, ki so le v nekaterih delih svojega ozemlja izkoristile možnost iz oddelka 1 poglavja 5 naslova III Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 o uvedbi sheme enotnega plačila na regionalni ravni, lahko uporabljajo ta člen na enaki regionalni ravni.
Any Member State applying the possibility provided for in the first subparagraph shall submit the following information to the Commission, by 1 December 2009:
Vsaka država članica, ki uporablja možnost iz prvega pododstavka, Komisiji do 1. decembra 2009 predloži naslednje informacije:
The Commission shall use the amounts referred to in point (a) of the second subparagraph of this paragraph as a basis for adjusting the national ceilings referred to in Article 40 for the Member States concerned as provided for in this Article.’;
Komisija uporabi zneske iz točke (a) drugega pododstavka tega odstavka kot podlago za prilagoditev nacionalnih zgornjih mej iz člena 40 za zadevne države članice, kot je določeno v tem členu.“;
Article 69 is amended as follows:
člen 69 se spremeni:
the following subparagraph is added to paragraph 1:
odstavku 1 se doda naslednji pododstavek:
‘The deadline of 1 August 2009 referred to in the previous subparagraph shall be replaced by 1 January 2010 in the case of Member States which decide to grant, from 2010, the support provided for in Article 68(1)(b) of this Regulation in favour of farmers in the dairy sector provided that, by way of derogation from Article 69(6) of this Regulation, the support is financed only by using the amounts of the national reserve.’;
„Rok 1. avgust 2009 iz prejšnjega pododstavka se nadomesti s 1. januarjem 2010, če se država članica odloči od leta 2010 dalje odobriti podporo iz člena 68(1)(b) te uredbe v korist kmetov v sektorju mleka, pod pogojem, da se z odstopanjem od člena 69(6) te uredbe podpora financira le z uporabo zneskov iz nacionalne rezerve.“;
in paragraph 5, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:
v odstavku 5 se prvi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘By way of derogation from paragraph 4, during calendar years 2010 to 2013, where a Member State granted support with regard to suckler cows in accordance with Article 69 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 while not having applied the option provided for in Article 68(2)(a)(i) of that Regulation, and in that connection used more than 50 % of the amounts established in accordance with Article 69 of that Regulation for the beef and veal sector, the limit set out in paragraph 4 of this Article shall be set at 6 % of that Member State’s national ceiling referred to in Article 40 of this Regulation. Furthermore, where more than 60 % of a Member State’s milk production takes place north of the 62nd parallel, that limit shall be set at 10 % of that Member State’s national ceiling referred to in Article 40 of this Regulation.’;
„Z odstopanjem od odstavka 4 se lahko za države članice, ki so dodelile podporo za rejo krav dojilj v skladu s členom 69 Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 in niso uporabile možnosti iz člena 68(2)(a)(i) navedene uredbe ter v zvezi s tem uporabile več kot 50 % zneskov, določenih v skladu s členom 69 navedene uredbe za sektor govejega in telečjega mesa, za obdobje med letoma 2010 in 2013 omejitev iz odstavka 4 tega člena določi na 6 % nacionalne zgornje meje iz člena 40 te uredbe. Poleg tega se za države članice, kjer se več kot 60 % mleka proizvede na območjih, ki ležijo severno od 62. vzporednika, ta omejitev določi na 10 % nacionalne zgornje meje iz člena 40 te uredbe.“;
the following subparagraph is added to Article 131(1):
členu 131(1) se doda naslednji pododstavek:
‘The deadline of 1 August 2009 referred to in the first subparagraph shall be replaced by 1 January 2010 in the case of the new Member States applying the single area payment scheme which decide to grant, from 2010, the support provided for in Article 68(1)(b) in favour of farmers in the dairy sector, provided that the support is financed in accordance with paragraph 3(a) of this Article.’;
„Rok 1. avgust 2009 iz prvega pododstavka se nadomesti s 1. januarjem 2010, če se nova država članica, ki uporablja shemo enotnega plačila na površino, odloči od leta 2010 dalje odobriti podporo iz člena 68(1)(b) v korist kmetov v sektorju mleka, pod pogojem, da se podpora financira v skladu s točko (a) odstavka 3 tega člena.“;
in Chapter 2 of Title VII, the following Article is inserted:
v poglavju 2 naslova VII se doda naslednji člen:
‘Article 146a
„Člen 146
Sheep and goat payments in 2009
Plačila za ovce in koze v letu 2009
In 2009, Member States having granted payments in the sheepmeat and goatmeat sector in accordance with Section 2 of Chapter 5 of Title III of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 may retain up to 50 % of the component of national ceilings referred to in Article 41 of this Regulation corresponding to the sheep and goat payments listed in Annex VI of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003.
Države članice, ki so odobrile plačila v sektorju ovčjega in kozjega mesa v skladu z oddelkom 2 poglavja 5 naslova III Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003, lahko v letu 2009 zadržijo do 50 % sredstev nacionalnih zgornjih meja iz člena 41 te uredbe, ki ustreza plačilom za ovce in koze iz Priloge IV k Uredbi (ES) št. 1782/2003.
In this case and within the limit of the ceiling fixed in accordance with Article 64(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, the Member States concerned shall make, in 2009, an additional payment to farmers.
Zadevna država članica v tem primeru in znotraj zgornje meje iz člena 64(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 leta 2009 kmetom izplača dodatno plačilo.
The additional payment shall be granted to farmers rearing sheep and goats under the conditions provided for in Chapter 11 of Title IV of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003.’;
Dodatno plačilo se odobri kmetom, ki redijo ovce in koze, pod pogoji iz poglavja 11 naslova IV Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003.“;
the second subparagraph of Article 146(1) is replaced by the following:
drugi pododstavek člena 146(1) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘However, Article 20(2), Article 64(2), Articles 66, 68, 68a, 68b and 69, Article 70(1)(b) and (2) and Chapters 1 (durum wheat), 5 (energy crops), 7 (dairy premium), 10 (arable crops area payment), 10b (aid for olive groves), 10c (tobacco production aid) and 10d (hops area payment) of Title IV of that Regulation shall continue to apply for 2009.’.
„Vendar se člen 20(2), člen 64(2), členi 66, 68, 68a, 68b in 69, člen 70(1)(b) in (2) ter poglavje 1 (trda pšenica), poglavje 5 (energetske poljščine), poglavje 7 (mlečna premija), poglavje 10 (plačilo na površino za poljščine), poglavje 10b (pomoč za oljčne nasade), poglavje 10c (pomoč za pridelovanje tobaka) in poglavje 10d (pomoč na površino za hmelj) naslova IV navedene uredbe še naprej uporabljajo za leto 2009.“
However, points 8 and 9 of Article 1 shall apply from 1 January 2009.
Vendar pa se točki 8 in 9 člena 1 uporabljata od 1. januarja 2009.
OJ L 323, 28.11.2002, p. 48.’;
UL L 323, 28.11.2002, str. 48.“;
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1251/2009
Izvedbena Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1251/2009
amending Regulation (EC) No 1911/2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of solutions of urea and ammonium nitrate originating, inter alia, in Russia
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1911/2006 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz raztopin sečnine in amonijevega nitrata s poreklom, med drugim, iz Rusije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Articles 9(4) and 11(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti členov 9(4) in 11(4) Uredbe,
PREVIOUS PROCEDURE
POSTOPEK
By Regulation (EC) No 1995/2000 [2], the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of solutions of urea and ammonium nitrate (‘UAN’) originating, inter alia, in Russia.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1995/2000 [2] je Svet uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz raztopin sečnine in amonijevega nitrata („SAN“) s poreklom, med drugim, iz Rusije.
That Regulation will hereinafter be referred to as ‘the original Regulation’ and the investigation that led to the measures imposed by the original Regulation will be hereinafter referred to as ‘the original investigation’.
Ta uredba se v nadaljnjem besedilu imenuje „prvotna uredba“, preiskava, ki je privedla do ukrepov, uvedenih s prvotno uredbo, pa se v nadaljnjem besedilu imenuje „prvotna preiskava“.
Following an expiry review initiated in September 2005 (‘the expiry review’), the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1911/2006 [3], renewed for five years these measures at their current level.
Po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa, ki se je začel septembra 2005 („pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa“), je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1911/2006 [3] za pet let obnovil te ukrepe na njihovi tedanji ravni.
The measures consist of specific duties.
Ti ukrepi so posebne dajatve.
A request for a new exporter review (‘the present review’) pursuant to Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation was lodged by Joint Stock Company Acron (‘the applicant’), an exporting producer in Russia.
Zahtevek za pregled glede novega izvoznika („sedanji pregled“) je v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe vložila delniška družba Acron („vložnik“), proizvajalka izvoznica v Rusiji.
The applicant alleged that it did not export UAN to the Union during the period of investigation on which the anti-dumping measures were based, that is, the period from 1 June 1998 to 31 May 1999 (‘the original investigation period’) and that it is not related to any of the exporting producers of UAN which are subject to the abovementioned anti-dumping measures.
Vložnik je trdil, da v obdobju preiskave, tj. od 1. junija 1998 do 31. maja 1999 („prvotno obdobje preiskave“), na katerem so temeljili protidampinški ukrepi, ni izvažal SAN v Skupnost, in da ni povezan z nobenim od proizvajalcev izvoznikov SAN, za katere veljajo navedeni protidampinški ukrepi.
The applicant further alleged that it began exporting UAN to the Union after the end of the original investigation period.
Vložnik je še trdil, da je začel izvažati SAN v Skupnost po koncu obdobja prvotne preiskave.
INITIATION OF A ‘NEW EXPORTER’ REVIEW
ZAČETEK PREGLEDA GLEDE „NOVEGA IZVOZNIKA“
After consulting the Advisory Committee and after the Union industry concerned had been given the opportunity to comment, the Commission initiated by Regulation (EC) No 241/2009 [4], a review of Regulation (EC) No 1911/2006 (‘measures in force’) with regard to the applicant.
Potem ko se je Komisija posvetovala s svetovalnim odborom in zadevni industriji Skupnosti dala možnost za pripombe, je z Uredbo (ES) št. 241/2009 [4] začela pregled Uredbe (ES) št. 1911/2006 („veljavni ukrepi“) v zvezi z vložnikom.
Pursuant to Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 241/2009, the anti-dumping duty of 20,11 EUR/tonne imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1911/2006 on imports of UAN produced and sold for export to the Union by the applicant was repealed.
V skladu s členom 2 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 241/2009 je bila razveljavljena protidampinška dajatev v višini 20,11 EUR/tono, uvedena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1911/2006 na uvoz SAN, ki jih je vložnik proizvajal in prodajal za izvoz v Skupnost.
The product concerned by the current review is the same as in the original investigation, i.e. a solution of urea and ammonium nitrate, a liquid fertiliser commonly used in agriculture, originating in Russia (‘the product concerned’).
Zadevni izdelek tega pregleda je izdelek iz prvotne preiskave, tj. raztopina sečnine in amonijevega nitrata, tekoče gnojilo, ki se pogosto uporablja v kmetijstvu, s poreklom iz Rusije („zadevni izdelek“).
The product concerned is currently falling within CN code 31028000.
Zadevni izdelek je sedaj uvrščen v oznako KN 31028000.
PARTIES CONCERNED
ZADEVNE STRANI
The Commission officially informed the applicant, the representatives of the exporting country and the association of Union producers about the initiation of the review.
Komisija je o začetku preiskave uradno obvestila vložnika, predstavnike države izvoznice in združenje proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da predstavijo svoja stališča v pisni obliki in zahtevajo zaslišanje v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
All interested parties, who so requested and showed that there were particular reasons why they should be heard, were granted a hearing.
Vsem zainteresiranim stranem, ki so zahtevale zaslišanje in dokazale, da zanj obstajajo posebni razlogi, je bilo zaslišanje odobreno.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the applicant and its related companies and received replies within the deadlines set for that purpose.
Komisija je vložniku in njegovim povezanim družbam poslala vprašalnike in odgovore prejela v rokih, določenih v ta namen.
JSC Acron, Novgorod, Russia,
delniška družba Acron, Novgorod, Rusija,
Agronova International Inc., Hallandale, USA (‘Agronova’).
Agronova International Inc., Hallandale, ZDA („Agronova“).
REVIEW INVESTIGATION PERIOD
OBDOBJE PREISKAVE V ZVEZI S PREGLEDOM
The ‘new exporter’ review investigation period covered the period from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2008 (‘RIP’).
Obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom glede novega izvoznika je trajalo od 1. januarja 2008 do 31. decembra 2008 („OPP“).
‘NEW EXPORTER’ QUALIFICATION
STATUS „NOVEGA IZVOZNIKA“
The investigation confirmed that the applicant had not exported the product concerned during the original investigation period and that it had begun exporting to the Union after this period.
S preiskavo je bilo potrjeno, da vložnik v obdobju prvotne preiskave zadevnega izdelka ni izvažal in da ga je v Skupnost začel izvažati po tem obdobju.
Furthermore, the applicant was able to demonstrate that it was not related to any of the exporters or producers in Russia which are subject to the anti-dumping measures in force on imports of the product concerned originating in Russia.
Poleg tega je vložnik dokazal, da ni bil povezan z nobenim od izvoznikov v Rusiji, za katere veljajo protidampinški ukrepi za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Rusije.
DETERMINATION OF NORMAL VALUE
DOLOČITEV NORMALNE VREDNOSTI
The applicant had no domestic sales in Russia of the product concerned.
Vložnik ni imel domače prodaje zadevnega izdelka v Rusiji.
In accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, the Commission instead calculated a constructed normal value, as follows:
Zato je Komisija v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe izračunala konstruirano normalno vrednost, kot je pojasnjeno v nadaljevanju.
Normal value was constructed on the basis of the manufacturing costs incurred by the applicant plus a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative costs (‘SG&A costs’) and for profits, in accordance with Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost je bila konstruirana na podlagi proizvodnih stroškov, ki jih je imel vložnik, ter razumnega zneska za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške („PSA-stroški“) in za dobiček, v skladu s členom 2(3) in (6) osnovne uredbe.
Adjustment of natural gas costs on the domestic Russian market
Prilagoditev stroškov za zemeljski plin na ruskem notranjem trgu
Regarding the cost of manufacturing, it should be noted that gas costs represent a major proportion of the manufacturing cost and a significant proportion of the total cost of production.
V zvezi s stroškom proizvodnje je treba navesti, da so stroški za plin velik del proizvodnih stroškov in znaten del vseh stroškov proizvodnje.
In accordance with Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether the costs associated with the production and sales of the product concerned were reasonably reflected in the records of the applicant.
V skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe je bilo proučeno, ali so bili stroški, povezani s proizvodnjo in prodajo zadevnega izdelka, v računovodskih evidencah vložnika ustrezno prikazani.
It was established that the domestic gas prices paid by the applicant were abnormally low.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so bile domače cene plina, ki jih je plačeval vložnik, nenormalno nizke.
By way of illustration, they amounted to between one fourth and one fifth of the export price of natural gas from Russia.
Za ponazoritev, znašale so med eno četrtino in eno petino izvozne cene zemeljskega plina iz Rusije.
In this regard, all available data indicates that domestic gas prices in Russia were regulated prices, which are far below market prices paid in unregulated markets for natural gas.
V zvezi s tem vsi razpoložljivi podatki kažejo, da so bile domače cene plina v Rusiji nadzorovane in precej nižje od tržnih cen, ki se plačujejo na nenadzorovanih trgih zemeljskega plina.
Since gas costs were not reasonably reflected in the applicant’s records, they had to be adjusted accordingly.
Ker stroški za plin niso bili ustrezno prikazani v računovodskih evidencah vložnika, jih je bilo treba temu primerno prilagoditi.
In the absence of any undistorted gas prices relating to the Russian domestic market, and in accordance with Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation, gas prices had to be established on ‘any other reasonable basis, including information from other representative markets’.
Na ruskem notranjem trgu so vse cene plina izkrivljene, zato je bilo treba cene plina v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe določiti na „kateri koli drugi ustrezni podlagi, vključno z informacijami z drugih reprezentativnih trgov“.
The adjusted price was based on the average price of Russian gas when sold for export at the German/Czech border (Waidhaus), net of transport costs and adjusted to reflect local distribution cost.
Prilagojena cena je temeljila na povprečni ceni ruskega plina pri prodaji za izvoz na nemško/češki meji („Waidhaus“) in neto stroških prevoza ter bila prilagojena tako, da je odražala lokalne stroške distribucije.
Waidhaus, being the main hub for Russian gas sales to the Union, which is both the largest market for Russian gas and has prices reasonably reflecting costs, can be considered a representative market within the meaning of Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation.
Waidhaus, glavno vozlišče za prodajo ruskega plina v EU, ki je hkrati največji trg za ruski plin in na katerem cene ustrezno odražajo stroške, se lahko šteje za reprezentativen trg v smislu člena 2(5) osnovne uredbe.
Following disclosure, the applicant submitted several claims linked to the (i) legal basis of the gas adjustment made on the one hand and (ii) to the methodologies applied for the gas adjustment on the other hand.
Po razkritju je vložnik predložil več trditev v zvezi s (i) pravno podlago prilagoditve stroškov za plin in (ii) v zvezi z metodologijami, ki se uporabljajo za prilagoditev stroškov za plin.
Legal basis of the gas adjustment
Pravna podlaga prilagoditve stroškov za plin