natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
With a view to facilitating trade with those third countries, provided that they have concluded undertakings with the Community which include clauses concerning closer cooperation on the prevention of fraud and that they maintain good trade relations with the Community, it is appropriate to authorise those concerned to consider documents issued by the producers themselves as documents issued by the said bodies or services of the third countries, in a manner similar to that already allowed for wines of Community origin.
Da se olajša trgovina s temi tretjimi državami, če so sklenile dogovore s Skupnostjo, ki vključujejo določbe o tesnejšem sodelovanju pri preprečevanju goljufij, in če vzdržujejo dobre trgovinske odnose s Skupnostjo, je primerno zadevne osebe pooblastiti, da obravnavajo dokumente, ki jih izdajo proizvajalci sami, kot dokumente, ki jih izdajo navedeni organi ali službe tretjih držav podobno, kot je že dovoljeno za vina s poreklom iz Skupnosti.
In those cases, appropriate assurances should be given and proper control over the issue of such documents should be exerted.
V teh primerih je treba dati ustrezno jamstvo in ustrezno nadzorovati izdajanje takih dokumentov.
Lists containing the names and addresses of the agencies and laboratories authorised in third countries to draw up certificates and analysis reports should be made public so that the authorities in the Community which supervise the import of wine products can, where necessary, carry out the requisite checks.
Sezname z imeni in naslovi agencij in laboratorijev, ki so v tretjih državah pooblaščeni za pripravo potrdil in analiznih izvidov, je treba objaviti, tako da lahko organi v Skupnosti, ki nadzorujejo uvoz proizvodov iz grozdja in vina, po potrebi opravijo predpisane preglede.
In order to facilitate controls by the competent authorities of Member States, the form and, where necessary, the content of the certificate and analysis report provided for, and the requirements for their use should be laid down.
Da se olajša nadzor, ki ga izvajajo pristojni organi držav članic, je treba določiti obliko in po potrebi vsebino predvidenega potrdila in analiznega izvida ter zahteve za njuno uporabo.
The certificate and, where appropriate, the analysis report relating to each consignment of an imported product should be checked in order to prevent fraud.
Da se preprečijo goljufije, je treba preveriti potrdilo, in kjer je ustrezno, analizni izvid za vsako pošiljko uvoženega proizvoda.
To this end, the document(s) must accompany each consignment until it is placed under Community control.
V ta namen mora dokument oziroma dokumenta spremljati vsako pošiljko, dokler ne pride pod nadzor Skupnosti.
To take commercial practice into account, where a consignment of wine is split up, the competent authorities should be empowered to have extracts of the certificate and the analysis report drawn up under their supervision to accompany each new consignment resulting from the splitting.
Da se upošteva poslovna praksa, je treba, če se pošiljka vina razdeli, pooblastiti pristojne organe, da dajo pod svojim nadzorom sestaviti izvleček potrdila in analiznega izvida, in ta izvlečka spremljata vsako novo pošiljko, ki nastane z razdelitvijo.
In view of the need to ensure swift and effective protection of consumers, it is essential to provide for the possibility of suspending the new arrangements in the event of fraud or a health risk to consumers.
Ker je treba zagotovitvi hitro in učinkovito varstvo potrošnikov, je bistveno predvideti možnost opustitve novih dogovorov v primeru goljufije ali ogrožanja zdravja potrošnikov.
Simple rules should also be laid down regarding the documents to be produced for imports from a third country other than the country of origin of the wine product, where that product has not undergone substantial processing.
Določiti je treba tudi preprosta pravila o dokumentih, ki jih je treba predložiti za uvoz iz tretje države, ki ni država porekla proizvoda iz grozdja ali vina, če ta proizvod ni bil bistveno predelan.
The task of the exporters and the authorities should be simplified by requiring a statement that the alcohol added to liqueur wines and wines fortified for distillation is of vinous origin to be included in the V I 1 document without requiring a separate document for this statement.
Nalogo izvoznikov in organov je treba poenostaviti z zahtevano izjavo, da alkohol, dodan likerskemu vinu in vinu, obogatenemu za destilacijo, izvira iz vinogradniških proizvodov; izjava se vključi v dokument V I 1, zanjo pa se ne zahteva ločen dokument.
For the same reason, the V I 1 document should be permitted to serve as the certificate testifying to the designation of origin required for imports of wines eligible for a tariff reduction.
Iz istega razloga je treba dovoliti, da se dokument V I 1 uporablja kot potrdilo o označbi porekla, ki se zahteva za uvoz vina po znižani carinski stopnji.
However, no certificate or analysis report is required in the case of some wines, provided a certificate of designation of origin is presented.
Potrdilo ali analizni izvid se ne zahtevata za nekatere vrste vina, če se predloži potrdilo o označbi porekla.
It should be permitted to use the V I 1 document to certify the designation of origin of the said liqueur wines and the section relating to the analysis report need not be completed.
Dovoliti je treba uporabo dokumenta V I 1 kot potrdila o označbi porekla za navedeno likersko vino, rubrike, ki se nanaša na analizni izvid, pa naj ne bi bilo treba izpolniti.
Wine imports under concessions provided for in agreements with certain third countries are subject to the presentation of attestations, issued by official bodies or bodies officially recognised by both contracting parties and appearing on lists drawn up jointly, to the effect that the wine in question meets the conditions for access to the concessions.
Uvoz vina s koncesijami, predvidenimi v sporazumih z nekaterimi tretjimi državami, je dovoljen na podlagi potrdil, ki jih izdajo uradni organi ali organi, ki jih uradno priznata obe pogodbenici in so vključeni na sezname, ki jih pogodbenici sestavita skupaj za potrditev, da zadevno vino izpolnjuje pogoje za dostop do koncesij.
The Member States should send the Commission the lists of official or officially recognised bodies that they propose should issue such attestations, so that the Commission can draw up and exchange those lists with the third countries concerned.
Države članice bi morale poslati Komisiji sezname uradnih ali uradno priznanih organov, ki jih predlagajo za izdajanje takih potrdil, da Komisija lahko te sezname sestavi in jih izmenja z zadevnimi tretjimi državami.
To facilitate the tasks of such bodies, the lists should be provided in a suitable form and on a suitable medium.
Da se tem organom olajša opravljanje njihovih nalog, je treba zagotoviti sezname v ustrezni obliki in na ustreznem mediju.
Articles 85 and 86 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provide for the treatment of unlawful plantings.
V členih 85 in 86 Uredbe (ES) št. 479/2008 je določena obravnava nezakonitih zasaditev.
It is necessary to lay down detailed rules concerning the penalties applicable to producers who do not comply with the new regularisation or grubbing-up obligation concerning vineyards planted without a corresponding planting right before 1 September 1998 and the communications to be transmitted by Member States to the Commission in this context.
Treba je določiti podrobna pravila o kaznih za proizvajalce, ki ne upoštevajo nove zakonske ureditve, ali obveznost izkrčitve vinogradov, zasajenih brez ustrezne pravice do zasaditve pred 1. septembrom 1998, in sporočila, ki jih v zvezi s tem države članice pošljejo Komisiji.
Without prejudice to earlier penalties imposed by the Member States, the penalty applicable in case of failure to comply with the obligation to grub up the unlawful area should be sufficiently high so as to incite producers to comply with the obligation.
Ne glede na prejšnje kazni, ki so jih naložile države članice, mora biti kazen v primeru neizpolnitve obveznosti izkrčitve nezakonito zasajenega območja dovolj visoka, da spodbudi proizvajalce k izpolnitvi obveznosti.
Therefore, the penalty should be at least the equivalent of twice the average value of the grubbing-up premium.
Zato bi morala kazen znašati vsaj toliko kot dvakratna povprečna vrednost premije za izkrčitev.
Article 87(1) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 foresees that proofs of non-circulation should be required whenever products of an unlawful vineyard may be put into circulation only for the purpose of distillation.
V členu 87(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 479/2008 je določeno, da je treba zahtevati dokazila o nedajanju v promet, če se proizvodi iz nezakonitih vinogradov lahko dajo v promet samo za destilacijo.
In order to strengthen control, the possible ways of non-circulation should be limited to three cases, namely to delivery for distillation or green harvesting at the expense of the producer concerned or family consumption, if the total vineyard area of a producer does not exceed 0.1 hectare.
Da se okrepi nadzor, je treba mogoče načine nedajanja v promet omejiti na tri primere, in sicer na dostavo za destilacijo, zeleno trgatev na stroške zadevnega proizvajalca ali porabo v družini proizvajalca, če skupna vinogradniška površina proizvajalca ne presega 0,1 hektarja.
It is appropriate to fix a deadline for the submission of the distillation contracts foreseen in that Article.
Primerno je določiti rok za predložitev pogodb o destilaciji iz navedenega člena.
To be able to effectively organise control, producers carrying out green harvesting should inform the competent authorities about their intention in due time.
Da se omogoči učinkovito organiziranje nadzora, bi morali proizvajalci, ki izvajajo zeleno trgatev, o svoji nameri pravočasno obvestiti pristojne organe.
In the interest of better controllability, Member States should have the possibility to foresee obligatory advance notification from the part of the producers as to which of the three ways of non-circulation they intend to use and also to further limit the choices of the producers concerning the possible ways of non-circulation.
Da se zagotovi boljši nadzor, morajo imeti države članice možnost določiti, da morajo proizvajalci obvezno predhodno sporočiti, katerega od treh načinov nedajanja v promet nameravajo uporabiti, in tudi dodatno omejiti izbiro proizvajalcev glede mogočih načinov nedajanja v promet.
To ensure fair and controllable use of Community budget, penalties with financial consequences should be foreseen in case Member States do not comply with communication obligations related to unlawful plantings.
Da se zagotovi poštena in nadzorovana poraba proračuna Skupnosti, je treba predvideti kazni s finančnimi posledicami za države članice, ki ne izpolnjujejo obveznosti poročanja o nezakonitih zasaditvah.
Article 91(1) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides for the grant of new planting rights in the case of measures for land consolidation or measures concerning compulsory purchase in the public interest.
V členu 91(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 479/2008 je predvidena dodelitev pravic do nove zasaditve pri ukrepih za komasacijo ali ukrepih v zvezi z obveznim odkupom v javnem interesu.
These new planting rights should not exceed those necessary to plant an area equivalent to 105 % of that lost to producers as a result of those measures, so as to avoid undermining the prohibition on planting contained in Article 90(1) of that Regulation.
Te pravice do nove zasaditve naj ne bi presegale pravic, potrebnih za zasaditev površine, ki ustreza 105 % površine, ki so jo proizvajalci izgubili zaradi teh ukrepov, s čimer se prepreči razvrednotenje prepovedi zasaditve iz člena 90(1) navedene uredbe.
Article 91(1) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 also provides for the grant of new planting rights in the case of experiments and graft nurseries.
V členu 91(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 479/2008 je predvidena tudi dodelitev pravic do nove zasaditve v primeru poskusov ali nasadov matičnih trt za cepiče.
The areas planted in pursuance of such grants of new planting rights should only be used for the specified purposes, and wine-sector products made from grapes coming from such areas should not be marketed.
Površine, zasajene v skladu s takimi dodelitvami pravic do nove zasaditve, bi se morale uporabljati samo za točno določene namene, proizvodi vinskega sektorja, proizvedeni iz grozdja s takih površin, pa se ne bi smeli dajati v promet.
Existing wine-growing experiments and graft nurseries should be allowed to continue, subject to the existing rules.
Obstoječi vinogradniški poskusi in nasadi matičnih trt za cepiče bi se morali dovoliti še naprej v skladu z veljavnimi predpisi.
Article 91(1) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 also provides for the grant of new planting rights in the case of areas whose wine or vine products are intended solely for the consumption of the vine grower’s family.
V členu 91(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 479/2008 je predvidena tudi dodelitev pravic do nove zasaditve za površine, katerih vinogradniško-vinarski proizvodi so namenjeni izključno za porabo v vinogradnikovi družini.
However, this could sometimes lead to an excessive administrative burden being imposed due to the large number of such cases in certain Member States.
To pa bi včasih lahko povzročilo čezmerno upravno obremenitev zaradi velikega števila takšnih primerov v nekaterih državah članicah.
Accordingly, Member States should be permitted to also allow such areas to exist even if no planting rights have been granted in respect of them, provided that, in order to prevent disturbance of the market balance, the areas concerned are small and that the vine grower is not engaged in commercial wine production.
Skladno s tem bi države članice lahko dovolile obstoj takšnih površin, čeprav niso bile zanje dodeljene pravice do zasaditve, če so zadevne površine, da se preprečijo motnje tržnega ravnotežja, majhne in če se vinogradnik ne ukvarja s proizvodnjo vina za trg.
The areas and producers concerned should be subject to appropriate monitoring and sanctions, including the grubbing up of such areas, in cases where the provisions are not observed.
Zadevne površine in proizvajalce bi bilo zato treba ustrezno nadzorovati, zanje pa naj bi veljale sankcije, vključno z izkrčitvijo takšnih površin ob neupoštevanju določb.
No replanting rights should be granted in respect of areas which have been compulsorily grubbed up owing to a breach of the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008.
Pravice do vnovične zasaditve se ne bi smele dodeljevati za tiste površine, ki so bile obvezno izkrčene zaradi kršitve zahtev iz Uredbe (ES) št. 479/2008.
To the same end, no replanting rights should be granted in respect of the grubbing-up of areas for which new planting rights have been granted for purposes other than the commercial production of wine.
Iz istega razloga se ne bi smele dodeljevati pravice do vnovične zasaditve za tiste izkrčene površine, za katere so bile dodeljene pravice do zasaditve za vse druge namene, razen za proizvodnjo vina za trg.
Article 92(2) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides for the grant of replanting rights to producers who undertake to grub up an area of vines in the future.
V členu 92(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 479/2008 je predvidena dodelitev pravic do vnovične zasaditve tistim proizvajalcem, ki se obvežejo, da bodo izkrčili vinogradniško površino.
Such a grant should only be made if the producer concerned does not possess sufficient planting rights to plant an area corresponding to the surface he intends to grub up.
Takšna dodelitev se lahko izvede samo, če zadevni proizvajalec nima dovolj pravic do zasaditve, da bi zasadil površino, ustrezajočo površini, ki jo namerava izkrčiti.
Any such grant of replanting rights on the basis of such an undertaking should be accompanied by the lodging of a security to ensure that the undertaking to grub up is carried out.
Vsako takšno dodelitev pravic do vnovične zasaditve na podlagi takšne obveze bi moral spremljati tudi polog varščine, s katerim bi se zagotovila izpolnitev obveznosti glede izkrčitve.
During the period of coexistence of the newly planted area and the area to be grubbed up, in order to avoid disturbance of market balance, only one such area should be permitted to produce wine to be marketed.
Med sočasnim obstajanjem novozasajene površine in površine, ki jo je treba izkrčiti, bi bilo treba vino, namenjeno trženju, proizvajati izključno samo na eni od teh površin, da se preprečijo motnje tržnega ravnotežja.
Article 93 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides for the creation or maintenance of national and/or regional reserves in order to improve the management of production potential.
V členu 93 Uredbe (ES) št. 479/2008 je predvidena ustanovitev ali vzdrževanje nacionalnih in/ali regionalnih rezerv, da bi se izboljšalo upravljanje obsega vinogradniških površin.
In order to avoid disturbance of the market balance, the transfer of rights via a reserve system should not lead to an overall increase in production potential on the territory of the Member States.
Da se preprečijo motnje tržnega ravnotežja, prenos pravic na podlagi sistema rezerv ne bi smel povzročiti skupnega povečanja obsega vinogradniških površin na ozemlju držav članic.
A similar prohibition of increasing the production potential has already been provided for in the case of transfer of rights between holdings in Article 92(5) of that Regulation.
Podobna prepoved povečanja obsega vinogradniških površin je bila predvidena že v členu 92(5) navedene uredbe za prenos pravic med gospodarstvi.
In these situations, Member States may apply a reduction coefficient in respect of transfers of rights.
V teh primerih lahko države članice pri prenosu pravic uporabijo koeficient zmanjšanja.
Article 93(5) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides that Member States are not to implement the reserve system if they can show that an effective system for managing planting rights exists throughout their territory.
V členu 93(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 479/2008 je določeno, da državam članicam ni treba izvajati sistema rezerv, če lahko dokažejo, da imajo na svojem celotnem ozemlju vzpostavljen učinkovit sistem upravljanja pravic do zasaditve.
In this situation a Member State may provide for the implementation of the reserve system in parts of its territory and another effective system in other parts of its territory.
V tem primeru lahko država članica za nekatere dele svojega ozemlja predvidi izvajanje sistema rezerv, za druge pa drug učinkovit sistem.
Member States wishing to use the option under that Article should be able to prove that such a system exists and to demonstrate the need for any derogation from the provisions of Chapter I of Title V of that Regulation.
Države članice, ki želijo izkoristiti možnost na podlagi navedenega člena, morajo biti sposobne dokazati obstoj takšnega sistema in potrebo po kakršnih koli odstopanjih od določb poglavja I naslova V navedene uredbe.
Article 90(6) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 provides that Member States may decide to maintain the prohibition of planting of vines of wine grape varieties until 31 December 2018 at the latest.
V členu 90(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 479/2008 je določeno, da se države članice lahko odločijo obdržati prepoved sajenja sort vinske trte najpozneje do 31. decembra 2018.
It is appropriate to foresee that Member States intending to avail themselves of this possibility communicate this to the Commission in due time.
Primerno je predvideti, da države članice, ki nameravajo izkoristiti to možnost, to pravočasno sporočijo Komisiji.
Article 100 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 foresees that grubbing-up premium may only be granted to areas which are tended.
V členu 100 Uredbe (ES) št. 479/2008 je predvideno, da se premija za izkrčitev lahko dodeli samo za negovane površine.
To enable authorities to verify whether an area is properly tended, beyond the obligatory on-the-spot checks, proofs about the production of the given vineyard should be foreseen.
Da se organom omogoči preveritev, ali je neka površina ustrezno negovana, je treba poleg obveznih pregledov na kraju samem predvideti tudi dokazila o proizvodnji določenega vinograda.
This should be done through the presentation of harvest declarations of the preceding years, or, if the harvest declaration is not available due to well justifiable reasons, by other means foreseen by the Member States for this purpose, the trustworthiness of which has to be thoroughly verified by the Member States.
To bi bilo treba narediti s predložitvijo prijav pridelka za predhodna leta, ali če prijava pridelka iz upravičenih razlogov ni na voljo, na druge načine, ki jih za to predvidijo države članice, ki morajo tudi preveriti zanesljivost teh načinov.
(5 9) According to Article 104(4) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008, Member States may exempt mountain or steep slope areas from the grubbing-up scheme.
V skladu s členom 104(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 479/2008 lahko države članice iz sheme za izkrčitev izvzamejo površine v gorah in na strmih pobočjih.
This exemption should cover terraces established for reasons of steepness of the slope which would make cultivation without terraces too difficult or would lead to serious erosion problems.
Ta izjema mora zajemati terase, urejene zaradi strmine pobočja, brez katerih bi bila pridelava preveč otežena ali bi prišlo do resnih težav z erozijo.
It is appropriate to lay down criteria for areas that may be subject to such exclusions, based on generally accepted professional standards.
Primerno je, da se na podlagi splošno sprejetih strokovnih standardov določijo merila za površine, ki se lahko tako izvzamejo.
Furthermore, according to Article 104(5) and (6) of that Regulation, Member States may also exempt areas based on environmental concerns and Greece may exempt areas planted with vines on the Aegean islands and the Greek Ionian islands, with the exception of Crete and Eubia.
V skladu s členom 104(5) in (6) navedene uredbe lahko države članice izvzamejo površine tudi na podlagi okoljskih razlogov, Grčija pa lahko izvzame površine, zasajene z vinsko trto, na egejskih in grških jonskih otokih, razen na Kreti in Eubii.
These exemptions should be well founded and regularly communicated to the Commission.
Te izjeme je treba ustrezno utemeljiti in redno sporočati Komisiji.
In view of the experience gained under the application of the former permanent abandonment measure, the system of the scales of the premium should be retained.
Na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih pri uporabi prejšnjega ukrepa za trajno opustitev, je treba obdržati sistem lestvic za premije.
The new scales of the grubbing-up premium are related to the scales of the premium valid under the scheme before the entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 479/2008, by adding +20 % to them in 2009, +10 % in 2010 and 0 % in 2011.
Nove lestvice za premije za izkrčitev so povezane z lestvicami za premije, ki so veljale na podlagi sheme pred začetkom veljavnosti Uredbe (ES) št. 479/2008, s tem da se povišajo za + 20 % leta 2009, + 10 % leta 2010 in 0 % leta 2011.
In view of subsidiarity, Member States should be made responsible for the administrative arrangements concerning the application procedure for the grubbing-up premium.
Zaradi subsidiarnosti bi morale biti države članice odgovorne za upravne dogovore o postopku prijave za premije za izkrčitev.
They should be free to determine the date until which they request producers to complete the grubbing-up measure, so as to have sufficient time for the necessary control before payments, which have to take place by 15 October.
Morale bi svobodno določiti datum, do katerega morajo proizvajalci dokončati ukrep izkrčitve, da imajo na voljo dovolj časa za potrebna preverjanja pred izplačili, ki morajo biti izvedena do 15. oktobra.