natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This regulation — Regulation 50/1998 of the Ministry of Transport and Communications of 13 March 1998 on provable loss in the public line passenger transport (the Regulation) — defines the provable loss in the public line passenger transport as: ‘the difference between the sum of the economically substantiated costs and the adequate profit and between the earned receipts and revenue’ (hereafter losses).
Zadevna uredba – Uredba 50/1998 Ministrstva za promet in zveze z dne 13. marca 1998 o dokazljivi izgubi v javnem potniškem prevozu („Uredba“) – opredeljuje dokazljivo izgubo v javnem potniškem prevozu kot: „razliko med vsoto ekonomsko utemeljenih stroškov in ustreznim dobičkom ter med dobljenimi prejemki in prihodki“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu „izgube“).
Additionally, the provisions of Paragraph 19b(2) and (4) of the Road Transport Law stipulates that ‘the preliminary professional estimate of the proven loss for the whole period for which the public service obligation is imposed, is the mandatory integral part of the public service obligation contract’. The relevant authorities ‘shall settle the proven loss at the maximum level of this preliminary professional estimate increased only by the unforeseen costs.
Poleg tega določbe iz odstavka 19b(2) in (4) Zakona o prevozih v cestnem prometu opredeljujejo, da „je predhodna strokovna ocena dokazane izgube za celotno obdobje, za katero je uvedena obveznost javne službe, obvezen sestavni del pogodbe o obveznosti javne službe.“ Zadevni organi „poravnajo dokazano izgubo na najvišji stopnji zadevne predhodne strokovne ocene, ki se poviša le za nepredvidene stroške.
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management [1], and in particular point 26 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju [1], zlasti točke 26,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund [2], and in particular Article 4(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002 z dne 11. novembra 2002 o ustanovitvi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije, zlasti člena 4(3) uredbe [2],
The European Union has created a European Union Solidarity Fund (the Fund) to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters.
Evropska unija je ustanovila Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije („sklad“), da bi pokazala solidarnost s prebivalstvom območij, ki so jih prizadele nesreče;
The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.
Medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 17. maja 2006 omogoča uporabo sklada do letne zgornje meje v višini 1 milijarde EUR;
Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 contains the provisions whereby the Fund may be mobilised.
Uredba (ES) št. 2012/2002 vsebuje določbe, v skladu s katerimi se sklad lahko uporabi;
In the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009, the European Union Solidarity Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 11785377 in commitment and payment appropriations.
Za splošni proračun Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009 bodo uporabljena sredstva iz Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije, in sicer 11785377 EUR za prevzem obveznosti in za plačila.
Done at Strasbourg, 11 March 2009.
V Strasbourgu, 11. marca 2009
Romania submitted an application to mobilise the Fund, concerning a disaster caused by floods. The Commission considers that the application meets the conditions set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002, and therefore proposes to authorise the corresponding appropriations,
Romunija je predložila vlogo za uporabo sklada v zvezi s škodo, ki so jo povzročile poplave; Komisija meni, da vloga izpolnjuje pogoje iz člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 2012/2002, zato predlaga, da se odobrijo ustrezna sredstva –
of 16 April 2009
z dne 16. aprila 2009
terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan
o zaključku protidampinškega postopka glede uvoza hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, Republike Koreje in Tajvana
On 1 February 2008, pursuant to Article 5 of the basic Regulation, the Commission announced by a notice (notice of initiation) published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2], the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding with regard to imports into the Community of stainless steel cold rolled flat products (SSCR), originating in the People’s Republic of China (PRC), the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan (the countries concerned).
Komisija je 1. februarja 2008 v skladu s členom 5 osnovne uredbe v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] objavila obvestilo o začetku protidampinškega postopka („obvestilo o začetku“) v zvezi z uvozom hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“), Republike Koreje in Tajvana („zadevne države“) v Skupnost.
The proceeding was initiated following a complaint lodged on 21 December 2007 by EUROFER (the complainant) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 25 %, of the total Community production of SSCR.
Postopek se je začel po pritožbi, ki jo je 21. decembra 2007 vložil EUROFER („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo večinski delež, v tem primeru več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla Skupnosti.
The complaint contained prima facie evidence of dumping of SSCR originating in the countries concerned and of material injury resulting therefrom, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of a proceeding.
Pritožba je vsebovala prima facie dokaze o dampingu hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz zadevnih držav in znatni škodi, ki je zaradi tega nastala, kar je zadostovalo za uvedbo postopka.
The Commission officially advised the complainant, all the Community producers, importer/traders and users known to be concerned and their associations, as well as the exporting producers and the authorities of the countries concerned of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je o začetku postopka uradno obvestila pritožnika, vse proizvajalce Skupnosti, uvoznike/trgovce in uporabnike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter njihova združenja, in proizvajalce izvoznike ter pristojne organe zadevnih držav.
In order to allow exporting producers in the PRC to submit a claim for market economy treatment (MET) or individual treatment (IT), if they so wished, the Commission sent claim forms to the exporting producers known to be concerned as well as to the authorities of the PRC.
Da bi proizvajalci izvozniki iz LRK lahko vložili zahtevek za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo („TGO“) ali individualno obravnavo („IO“), če tako želijo, je Komisija proizvajalcem izvoznikom, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in organom LRK poslala obrazce za zahtevek.
Four groups of companies in the PRC claimed MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation or IT, should the investigation establish that they did not meet the conditions for MET.
Štiri skupine družb v LRK so zahtevale MET v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe ali pa IT, če bi preiskava pokazala, da pogojev za MET ne izpolnjujejo.
In view of the apparent large number of exporting producers in the PRC, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan, of importers in the Community, and of Community producers, sampling for those parties was envisaged in the notice of initiation in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi očitno velikega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK, Republiki Koreji in na Tajvanu, uvoznikov v Skupnosti in proizvajalcev Skupnosti je bilo v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje za navedene stranke.
However, for the PRC and the Republic of Korea, given that the investigation of all the cooperating companies or company groups was considered feasible within the deadlines and not unduly burdensome, it was subsequently decided that sampling would not be necessary.
Vendar pa je bilo v primeru LRK in Republike Koreje, glede na to, da se je preiskava vseh sodelujočih družb ali skupin družb štela za izvedljivo v rokih in ne pretirano obremenilna, naknadno odločeno, da vzorčenje ni potrebno.
For Taiwan, out of the 10 companies or company groups (one group consisted of two companies) which had replied to the sampling questions, a sample of four companies or company groups was selected.
V primeru Tajvana je bil od desetih družb ali skupin družb (ena skupina je bila sestavljena iz dveh družb), ki so odgovorile na vprašanja o vzorčenju, izbran vzorec štirih družb ali skupin družb.
However, one of them subsequently withdrew its cooperation; therefore the final sample consists of three companies or company groups.
Vendar pa je ena izmed teh družb pozneje sodelovanje preklicala; zato končni vzorec sestavljajo tri družbe ali skupine družb.
Finally, one non-sampled Taiwanese company requested individual examination pursuant to Article 17(3) of the basic Regulation.
Končno je ena nevzorčena tajvanska družba zahtevala individualno preiskavo v skladu s členom 17(3) osnovne uredbe.
However, since it did not submit sufficient information, it was considered as non-cooperating.
Ker pa ni predložila dovolj informacij, se je štela za nesodelujočo.
As concerns the importers of SSCR, the Commission requested all known importers to provide information concerning imports and sales of the product concerned.
Kar zadeva uvoznike hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla je Komisija zaprosila vse znane uvoznike, da zagotovijo informacije o uvozu in prodaji zadevnega izdelka.
The five major importers in terms of volume of imports were selected for the sample.
Za vzorec je bilo izbranih pet največjih uvoznikov glede na obseg uvoza.
These importers represent around 16 % of total Community imports from the countries concerned.
Ti uvozniki predstavljajo okrog 16 % celotnega uvoza Skupnosti iz zadevnih držav.
However, three of the selected importers eventually did not submit a questionnaire reply and decided not to cooperate further with the investigation.
Vendar pa trije izbrani uvozniki na koncu niso predložili izpolnjenih vprašalnikov in so se odločili, da v nadaljnji preiskavi ne bodo sodelovali.
The two remaining importers represented 2 to 4 % of the total Community imports from the countries concerned during the investigation period.
Ostala dva uvoznika sta med obdobjem preiskave predstavljala 2–4 % celotnega uvoza Skupnosti iz zadevnih držav.
As inclusion of some of the other importers which had offered cooperation would only slightly affect the representativity of the sample, it was decided not to replace the three sampled importers which ceased their cooperation with the investigation.
Ker bi vključitev nekaterih drugih uvoznikov, pripravljenih sodelovati, le neznatno vplivala na reprezentativnost vzorca, je bilo odločeno, da se treh vzorčenih uvoznikov, ki so prekinili svoje sodelovanje, ne nadomesti.
With regard to the Community producers, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation, a sample was selected based on the largest representative volume of production and EC sales of SSCR in the Community, which could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
V skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe je za proizvajalce Skupnosti vzorec izbran na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega proizvodnje in prodaje ES hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla v Skupnosti, ki ga je bilo mogoče ustrezno preiskati v razpoložljivem času.
On the basis of the information received from the producers in the Community, the Commission selected four companies (two groups of related companies) having the largest volume of production and sales in the Community.
Komisija je na podlagi informacij, ki so jih predložili proizvajalci v Skupnosti, izbrala štiri družbe (dve skupini povezanih družb) z največjim obsegom proizvodnje in prodaje v Skupnosti.
In terms of Community production, the sampled companies represented 62 % of the estimated total production of SSCR in the Community and 99 % of the sales volume in the Community of the producers that offered cooperation.
Vzorčene družbe v smislu proizvodnje Skupnosti predstavljajo 62 % ocenjene celotne proizvodnje hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla v Skupnosti in 99 % obsega prodaje v Skupnosti proizvajalcev, pripravljenih sodelovati.
In addition, the remaining Community producers were requested to provide certain general data for the injury analysis.
Od ostalih proizvajalcev Skupnosti se je zahtevalo, da predložijo nekatere splošne podatke za analizo škode.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the sampled exporting producers, Community producers and importers, and to all known users and user associations.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike vzorčenim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, proizvajalcem in uvoznikom Skupnosti ter vsem znanim uporabnikom in združenjem uporabnikov.
Full questionnaire replies were received from four Community producers, 25 companies belonging to four company groups in the PRC, eight companies belonging to three company groups in the Republic of Korea, three sampled exporting producers in Taiwan, one company in Taiwan requesting individual examination, two importers and five users in the Community.
Popolnoma izpolnjene vprašalnike je prejela od štirih proizvajalcev Skupnosti, 25 družb, ki spadajo v štiri skupine družb v LRK, osmih družb, ki spadajo v tri skupine družb v Republiki Koreji, treh vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Tajvanu, ene družbe v Tajvanu, ki je zahtevala individualno preiskavo, dveh uvoznikov in petih uporabnikov v Skupnosti.
In addition six remaining Community producers provided the requested general data.
Poleg tega je šest preostalih proizvajalcev Skupnosti predložilo zahtevane splošne podatke.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for the purpose of examining the MET/IT claims in the case of the PRC, and for a determination of dumping, resulting injury and Community interest for the countries concerned.
Komisija je zahtevala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za namene proučitve zahtevkov za TGO/IO v primeru LRK in ugotovitev dampinga, škode, ki je zaradi njega nastala, ter interesa Skupnosti za vse zadevne države.
ArcelorMittal, Genk, Belgium,
ArcelorMittal, Genk, Belgija,
ArcelorMittal, Paris, France,
ArcelorMittal, Pariz, Francija,
ThyssenKrupp Nirosta, Krefeld, Germany,
ThyssenKrupp Nirosta, Krefeld, Nemčija,
ThyssenKrupp Terni, Terni, Italy;
ThyssenKrupp Terni, Terni, Italija;
YUSCO Group (Yieh United Steel Corporation and related companies), Kaohsiung;
skupina YUSCO (Yieh United Steel Corporation in povezane družbe), Kaohsiung;
Exporting producers in the Republic of Korea
Proizvajalci izvozniki v Republiki Koreji
The group of BNG Steel Co., Ltd and Hyundai Steel Company; Changwon and Seoul,
skupina BNG Steel Co., Ltd in Hyundai Steel Company; Changwon in Seoul,
The group of POSCO and Daimyung TMS CO., Ltd; Seoul;
skupina POSCO in Daimyung TMS CO., Ltd; Seoul;
POSCO China Group, (group of eight companies); Zhangjiagang, Qingdao and Hong Kong SAR,
skupina POSCO China, (skupina 8 družb); Zhangjiagang, Qingdao in Hong Kong SAR,
STSS Group (Shanxi Taigang Stainless Steel Co., Ltd and 14 related companies); Taiyuan, Tianjin, Wuxi, Foshan, Hong Kong SAR and Willich, Germany;
skupina STSS (Shanxi Taigang Stainless Steel Co. Ltd in 14 povezanih družb); Taiyuan, Tianjin, Wuxi, Foshan, Hong Kong SAR in Willich, Nemčija;
Minmetals Germany GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany,
Minmetals Germany GmbH, Düsseldorf, Nemčija,
Nord Est Metalli Srl, San Vito al Tagliamento, Italy;
Nord Est Metalli Srl, San Vito al Tagliamento, Italija;
BSH Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH, München, Germany,
BSH Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH, München, Nemčija,
Eberspächer GmbH & Co. KG, Neunkirchen, Germany,
Eberspächer GmbH & Co. KG, Neunkirchen, Nemčija,
Lowara Srl, Montecchio Maggiore, Italy.
Lowara Srl, Montecchio Maggiore, Italija.
In light of the need to establish a normal value for the exporting producers in the PRC to which MET might not be granted, a verification in the provisionally selected analogue country, the USA, took place at the premises of the following producers:
Glede na potrebo po določitvi normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK, ki jim TGO morda ne bo odobrena, so bili opravljeni preveritveni obiski v začasno izbrani primerljivi državi, ZDA, v prostorih naslednjih družb:
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2007 (the investigation period or IP).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2007 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2004 to the end of the investigation period (period considered).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2004 do konca obdobja preiskave („obravnavano obdobje“).
The product allegedly being dumped is flat-rolled products of stainless steel, not further worked than cold-rolled (cold-reduced), originating in the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan (the product concerned), normally declared within CN codes 72193100, 72193210, 72193290, 72193310, 72193390, 72193410, 72193490, 72193510, 72193590, 72202021, 72202029, 72202041, 72202049, 72202081 and 72202089.
Izdelek, ki se domnevno uvaža po dampinških cenah, so valjani ploščati izdelki iz nerjavnega jekla, hladno valjani (hladno deformirani), brez nadaljnje obdelave, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, Republike Koreje in Tajvana („zadevni izdelek“), navadno uvrščeni pod oznake KN 72193100, 72193210, 72193290, 72193310, 72193390, 72193410, 72193490, 72193510, 72193590, 72202021, 72202029, 72202041, 72202049, 72202081 in 72202089.
SSCR is used in a wide range of consumer industries and final applications.
Hladno valjani ploščati izdelki iz nerjavnega jekla se uporabljajo v različnih potrošnih industrijah in končnih aplikacijah.
Examples of these are:
Primeri teh uporab so naslednji:
car manufacturing: exhaust systems, decoration, safety and structural components,
avtomobilska proizvodnja: izpušni sistemi, dekoracija, varnostni in strukturni elementi,
equipment for the chemicals, petrochemicals, papermaking, food processing and pharmaceuticals industries,
naprave za kemično, petrokemično, papirno, živilskopredelovalno in farmacevtsko industrijo,
domestic appliances, kitchen utensils, tableware and cutlery,
gospodinjski aparati, kuhinjski pripomočki, namizni pribor in rezila,
manufacture of medical equipment,
proizvodnja medicinske opreme,
public lighting and street furniture equipment,
javna razsvetljava in cestna oprema,
manufacture of tubes for fluids transport, decoration, structural applications, heat exchangers,
proizvodnja cevi za prevoz tekočin, dekorativne in strukturne elemente, toplotne izmenjalnike,
shipbuilding,
ladjedelništvo,
desalination plants,
obrati za razsoljevanje,
manufacture of railway trucks and carriages, road tankers, refrigerated containers,
proizvodnja železniških vagonov, avtocistern, hladilnih zabojnikov,
decoration and structural applications in building industry.
dekorativni in strukturni elementi v gradbeni industriji.
Interim report and subsequent procedure
Vmesno poročilo in nadaljnji postopek
On 4 November 2008 the Commission disclosed to interested parties an Interim Report setting out its provisional findings with respect to this proceeding, i.e. the fact that the investigation established provisionally the existence of dumping but it did not conclude on the existence of a material link between dumped imports and any injury suffered by the Community industry and underlined the need to investigate further the situation as well as the aspect of possible threat of injury.
Komisija je 4. novembra 2008 zainteresiranim strankam razkrila vmesno poročilo, ki navaja začasne ugotovitve v zvezi s tem postopkom, tj. dejstvo, da je bil s preiskavo začasno ugotovljen obstoj dampinga, ne pa dejanska zveza med dampinškim uvozom in kakršno koli škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, ter poudarila potrebo po nadaljnji preiskavi zadeve in morebitne grožnje škode.
On the basis of the provisional findings it was considered appropriate not to impose any provisional measures but to continue the investigation.
Na podlagi začasnih ugotovitev se je zdelo primerno, da se začasni ukrepi ne uvedejo, ampak da se preiskava nadaljuje.
All parties were given an opportunity to submit relevant evidence and comments on the provisional findings.
Vse stranke so imele možnost, da v zvezi z začasnimi ugotovitvami predložijo ustrezne dokaze in pripombe.
The parties which so requested were also granted the opportunity to be heard.
Stranke, ki so to zahtevale, so prav tako lahko izrazile svoja mnenja.
The Commission continued to seek and verify all information it deemed necessary for its final findings.
Komisija je ponovno zahtevala in preverila informacije, za katere je menila, da so potrebne za sprejetje dokončnih ugotovitev.
By a letter dated 4 March 2009 addressed to the Commission, the complainant formally withdrew its complaint.
Pritožnik je v pismu Komisiji z dne 4. marca 2009 uradno umaknil svojo pritožbo.
According to the complainant, this withdrawal was prompted by the fact that the current market situation for the Community industry differs significantly from the market situation in which the complaint was filed, given that the real and apparent demand has recently collapsed in the EU and this has also led to a decline in imports.
Pojasnil je, da so umik sprožile trenutne razmere na trgu za industrijo Skupnosti, ki se zelo razlikujejo od razmer, v katerih je bila pritožba vložena, saj je dejansko in očitno povpraševanje v EU nedavno usahnilo, kar je prav tako vplivalo na padec uvoza.
In view of these market turbulences, the complainant does not want to pursue its current case which was based on an analysis of historic data that no longer fully reflect the current market conditions.
Zaradi teh pretresov na trgu ne želi nadaljevanja obravnave svojega primera na podlagi analize preteklih podatkov, ki ne odražajo več v celoti trenutnih tržnih pogojev.
According to the complainant, it is preferable to respond in these circumstances to any unfair injurious trade practices by way of a new case – in case a future situation would warrant such action – which could fully address the totality of the issues.
Po njegovem mnenju se je v teh okoliščinah bolje odzvati na nepoštene in škodljive trgovinske prakse z novim primerom – če bi nadaljnje razmere upravičile takšno ravnanje – ki bi v celoti obravnaval vsa vprašanja.
The complainant also argued that should the import volumes surge again, these imports could in the prevailing circumstances cast the viability of the Community industry into doubt.
Pritožnik je tudi trdil, da je vprašanje, če bi industrija Skupnosti v trenutnih okoliščinah lahko preživela ponovno povečanje obsega uvoza.
It should be noted that the current situation with respect to the product concerned both in the EU and in the countries concerned is characterised by an unprecedented change of the fundamental economic parameters.
Treba je opozoriti, da so trenutne razmere v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom v EU in v zadevnih državah zaznamovane s spremembami osnovnih gospodarskih dejavnikov, kakršnih še ni bilo.
While in these circumstances it is difficult to make reasoned assumptions as to the development of the market in the short to medium-term, it would also seem that the economic situation is volatile and that the appearance of injurious dumping could not be excluded.
V takšnih okoliščinah je težko postavljati razumne domneve glede kratkoročnega do srednjeročnega razvoja trga in poleg tega se zdi, da so gospodarske razmere spremenljive in da se pojava škodljivega dampinga ne da izključiti.