natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This Regulation shall enter into force on 6 February 2009.
Ta uredba začne veljati 6. februarja 2009.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 109/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 109/2009
fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to applications for import licences for olive oil lodged from 2 to 3 February 2009 under the Tunisian tariff quota and suspending the issue of import licences for the month of February 2009
o določitvi koeficienta dodelitve, ki se bo uporabil za zahtevke za izdajo uvoznih dovoljenj za oljčno olje, vložene od 2 do 3. februarja 2009 v okviru tunizijske tarifne kvote, in o začasni ukinitvi izdaje uvoznih dovoljenj za mesec februar 2009
Import licence applications have been submitted to the competent authorities under Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1918/2006 in respect of a total quantity exceeding the limit laid down for the month of February in Article 2(2) of that Regulation.
V skladu s členom 3(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1918/2006 so bili pri pristojnih organih vloženi zahtevki za izdajo uvoznih dovoljenj za skupno količino, ki presega mesečno vrednost, ki je v členu 2(2) navedene uredbe določena za mesec februar.
Since the limit for the month of February has been reached, no more import licences can be issued for that month,
Ker je vrednost za mesec februar dosežena, se za zadevni mesec uvozna dovoljenja ne morejo več izdati –
The quantities for which import licence applications were lodged from 2 and 3 February 2009 under Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1918/2006 shall be multiplied by an allocation coefficient of 90,947950 %.
Za zahtevke za izdajo uvoznih dovoljenj, vložene od 2. do 3. februarja 2009 v skladu s členom 3(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1918/2006, se določi koeficient dodelitve 90,947950 %.
The issue of import licences in respect of amounts applied for as from 9 February 2009 shall be suspended for February 2009.
Izdaja uvoznih dovoljenj za količine, zahtevane od 9. februarja 2009, se za februar 2009 začasno ukine.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 111/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 111/2009
This Regulation shall enter into force on 7 February 2009.
Ta uredba začne veljati 7. februarja 2009.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 112/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 112/2009
imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of wire rod originating in the People's Republic of China and the Republic of Moldova
o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz valjane žice s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Republike Moldavije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Article 7 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dumpinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“) in zlasti člena 7 Uredbe,
On 25 March 2008, the Commission received a complaint concerning imports of bars and rods, hot-rolled, in irregularly wound coils, of iron, non-alloy steel or alloy steel other than of stainless steel, (wire rod), originating in the People’s Republic of China (the PRC), the Republic of Moldova (the RM) and Turkey.
Komisija je 25. marca 2008 prejela pritožbo v zvezi z uvozom žice, vroče valjane, v ohlapnih kolobarjih, iz železa, nelegiranega jekla ali legiranega jekla, razen iz nerjavnega jekla („valjana žica“), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (LRK), Republike Moldavije (RM) in Turčije.
The complaint was lodged pursuant to Article 5 of the basic Regulation by EUROFER (the complainant) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 25 %, of the total Community production of wire rod.
Pritožbo je v skladu s členom 5 osnovne uredbe vložilo združenje EUROFER („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo večinski delež, v tem primeru več kot 25 % skupne proizvodnje valjane žice v Skupnosti.
The complaint contained prima facie evidence of dumping and of material injury caused by such dumping which was considered sufficient to justify the opening of a proceeding.
Ta pritožba je vsebovala prima facie dokaze o dampingu in znatni škodi, ki jo je povzročil, kar je zadostovalo za upravičenost začetka postopka.
On 8 May 2008, a proceeding was initiated by the publication of a notice of initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] (the notice of initiation).
Postopek se je začel 8. maja 2008 z objavo obvestila o začetku v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] („obvestilo o začetku“).
The Commission officially advised the exporting producers in the PRC, the RM and Turkey, importers, traders, users and associations known to be concerned, the authorities of the PRC, the RM and Turkey, the complainant Community producers and other Community producers known to be concerned of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je o začetku postopka uradno obvestila proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK, RM in Turčiji, uvoznike, trgovce, uporabnike in združenja, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, organe LRK, RM in Turčije, proizvajalce Skupnosti pritožnike ter druge proizvajalce Skupnosti, za katere je znano, da jih začetek postopka zadeva.
All interested parties who so requested and showed that there were particular reasons why they should be heard were granted a hearing.
Vsem zainteresiranim strankam, ki so zahtevale zaslišanje ter so dokazale, da zanj obstajajo posebni razlogi, je bilo to odobreno.
In order to allow exporting producers to submit a claim for market economy treatment (MET) or individual treatment (IT), if they so wished, the Commission sent claim forms to the Chinese and Moldovan exporting producers known to be concerned and to the authorities of the PRC and RM.
Da bi proizvajalci izvozniki lahko predložili zahtevek za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo („TGO“) ali individualno obravnavo („IO“), če tako želijo, je Komisija kitajskim in moldavskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter organom LRK in RM poslala obrazce za zahtevek.
Two exporting producers from the PRC, both consisting of groups of related companies, and one from the RM, requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, or IT should the investigation establish that they do not meet the conditions for MET.
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika iz LRK, ki sta oba del skupin povezanih družb, in en proizvajalec iz RM so vložili zahtevek za TGO v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe ali IO, če bi preiskava pokazala, da ne izpolnjujejo pogojev za TGO.
In view of the apparent high number of exporting producers in the PRC and Turkey, importers and producers in the Community, the Commission indicated in the notice of initiation that sampling methods might be applied for the determination of dumping and injury, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je glede na očitno veliko število proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK in Turčiji ter uvoznikov in proizvajalcev v Skupnosti v obvestilu o začetku navedla, da bo morda za ugotovitev dampinga in škode v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe uporabila metode vzorčenja.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, all exporting producers in the PRC and in Turkey, Community importers and Community producers were asked to make themselves known to the Commission and to provide, as specified in the notice of initiation, basic information on their activities related to the product concerned.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno in, če je, da bi lahko izbrala vzorec, so se morali vsi proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK in Turčiji ter uvozniki in proizvajalci Skupnosti prijaviti Komisiji in zagotoviti, kot je bilo določeno v obvestilu o začetku, osnovne podatke o svojih dejavnostih, povezanih z zadevnim izdelkom.
Given the limited number of responses to the sampling exercise, it was decided that sampling was not necessary for Chinese and Turkish exporting producers, or for Community producers and importers within the Community.
Glede na omejeno število odgovorov na vzorčenje je bilo odločeno, da vzorčenje za kitajske in turške proizvajalce izvoznike ali za proizvajalce Skupnosti in uvoznike v Skupnosti ni potrebno.
Questionnaires were sent to all companies in the PRC, and Turkey who responded to the sampling exercise, to the sole Moldovan exporting producer, to all Community producers, users and importers who responded to the sampling exercise, and to all other parties known to be concerned.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani vsem družbam v LRK in Turčiji, ki so se odzvale na vzorčenje, edinemu moldavskemu proizvajalcu izvozniku, vsem proizvajalcem Skupnosti, uporabnikom in uvoznikom, ki so se odzvali na vzorčenje, ter vsem drugim strankam, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva.
Replies were received from two groups of exporting producers in the PRC, one exporting producer in the RM, six exporting producers in Turkey, 20 Community producers, one importer and eight users in the Community.
Komisija je prejela odgovore od dveh skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK, enega proizvajalca izvoznika v RM, šestih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Turčiji, 20 proizvajalcev v Skupnosti, enega uvoznika in osmih uporabnikov v Skupnosti.
Exporting producers in the PRC
Proizvajalca izvoznika v LRK
Hunan Valin Xiangtan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd and Hunan Xianggang Huaguang Wire Rod Co. Ltd, Xiangtan, Hunan province, PRC;
Hunan Valin Xiangtan Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. in Hunan Xianggang Huaguang Wire Rod Co. Ltd., Xiangtan, provinca Hunan, LRK
Exporting producer in the RM
Proizvajalec izvoznik v RM
Joint Stock Company Moldova Steel Works (hereinafter MMZ), Rybnitsa, Transnistrian region of the RM; and its related sales company Panfermag Holding Ltd, Limassol, Cyprus, at its premises in Kiev, Ukraine;
Joint Stock Company Moldova Steel Works (v nadaljevanju MMZ), Ribnita, pridnestrska regija RM; ter njegova povezana prodajna družba Panfermag Holding Ltd., Limassol, Ciper, v prostorih v Kijevu, Ukrajina
Çolakoglu Metalurji A.S and its related sales company Çolakoglu dis Ticaret A.S., Karakoy, Turkey,
Çolakoglu Metalurji A.S in njegova povezana prodajna družba Çolakoglu dis Ticaret A.S., Karakoy, Turčija
Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endüstrisi AS, Kartal, Turkey,
Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endüstrisi A.S., Kartal, Turčija
Içdas Çelik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim Sanayi AS, Istanbul, Turkey,
Içdas Çelik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim Sanayi A.S., Istanbul, Turčija
Iskenderun Demir ve Çelik Fabrikalari AS, Iskenderun, Turkey,
Iskenderun Demir ve Çelik Fabrikalari A.S., Iskenderun, Turčija
Kroman Çelik Sanayii AS, Kocaeli, Turkey;
Kroman Çelik Sanayii A.S, Kocaeli, Turčija
Riva Fire SpA, Milan, Italy and its related companies Riva Acier SA, Gargenville, France; Riva Stahl GmbH, Hennigsdorf, Germany and Brandenburgische ElektroStahlwerke (BES) GmbH, Brandenburg, Germany,
Riva Fire S.p.A, Milano, Italija in povezane družbe Riva Acier S.A., Gargenville, Francija; Riva Stahl GmbH, Hennigsdorf, Nemčija ter Brandenburgische ElektroStahlwerke (BES) GmbH, Brandenburg, Nemčija
Global Steel Wire, Santander, Spain,
Global Steel Wire, Santander, Španija
ArcelorMittal Hamburg GmbH, Hamburg, Germany; ArcelorMittal Grandrange, Amneville, France; ArcelorMittal Poland, Katowice, Poland,
ArcelorMittal Hamburg GmbH, Hamburg, Nemčija; ArcelorMittal Grandrange, Amneville, Francija; ArcelorMittal Poland, Katovice, Poljska
Feralpi Siderurgica SpA, Lonato, Italy,
Feralpi Siderurgica S.p.A, Lonato, Italija
Corus, London, United Kingdom,
Corus, London, Združeno kraljestvo
Duferco La Louviere Sales S.A, Manage, Belgium;
Duferco La Louviere Sales S.A, Manage, Belgija
Importers in the Community
Uvoznik v Skupnost
Montan Gesellschaft Voss GmbH, Planegg, Germany;
Montan Gesellschaft Voss GmbH, Planegg, Nemčija
Users in the Community
Uporabnik v Skupnosti
Unifer SpA, Piacenza, Italy.
Unifer S.p.A, Piacenza, Italija
In view of the need to establish a normal value for exporting producers in the PRC and the RM to which MET might not be granted, a verification to establish normal value on the basis of data from an analogue country, Brazil in this case, took place at the premises of the following company:
Zaradi potrebe po določitvi normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK in RM, katerim TGO morda ne bo odobrena, je bil v prostorih naslednje družbe izveden preveritveni obisk z namenom določitve normalne vrednosti na podlagi podatkov iz primerljive države, v tem primeru Brazilije:
Arcelor Mittal Brazil, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Arcelor Mittal Brazil, Belo Horizonte, Brazilija.
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 April 2007 to 31 March 2008 (investigation period or IP).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. aprila 2007 do 31. marca 2008 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2004 to the end of the investigation period (period considered).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2004 do konca obdobja preiskave („obravnavano obdobje“).
The product concerned is bars and rods, hot-rolled, in irregularly wound coils, of iron, non-alloy steel or alloy steel other than of stainless steel originating in the PRC, the RM and Turkey (the product concerned or wire rod), normally declared within CN codes 72131000, 72132000, 72139110, 72139120, 72139141, 72139149, 72139170, 72139190, 72139910, 72139990, 72271000, 72272000, 72279010, 72279050 and 72279095.
Zadevni izdelek je žica, vroče valjana, v ohlapnih kolobarjih, iz železa, nelegiranega jekla ali legiranega jekla, razen iz nerjavnega jekla, s poreklom iz LRK, RM in Turčije („zadevni izdelek“ ali valjana žica), navadno uvrščena pod oznake KN 72131000, 72132000, 72139110, 72139120, 72139141, 72139149, 72139170, 72139190, 72139910, 72139990, 72271000, 72272000, 72279010, 72279050 in 72279095.
The product concerned does not include stainless steel wire rod.
Zadevni izdelek ne vključuje valjane žice iz nerjavnega jekla.
To produce wire rod, steel billets produced from an electric arc furnace (EAC) or a blast furnace melt shop are rolled through a rolling mill. Billets are progressively reduced in cross-section by passing through a series of rolls and then coiled.
Za proizvodnjo valjane žice se jeklene palice, ki se proizvedejo v električni obločni peči ali plavžu, zvaljajo v valjarni. Palicam se prečni prerez postopno manjša, tako da gredo skozi več valjev, nato pa se zvijejo v kolobarje.
The EAC process uses metal scrap, while the blast furnace process uses metal scrap and iron ore.
Pri postopku v električni obločni peči se uporabljajo odpadne kovine, medtem ko se pri postopku v plavžih uporabljajo odpadne kovine in železova ruda.
Wire rod is used for welded mesh in the construction industry (pre- or post-stressing wires and wire strands used for reinforcement of concrete), and has many other uses after been drawn into wire, including in the tyre industry (tyre cord), in the nut and bolt industry (fasteners), fencing products, supermarket trolleys, steel cord, electrodes, cables, bed springs, suspension springs and welding wire.
Valjana žica se uporablja za varjene mreže v gradbeni industriji (žice in pletene žične vrvi za pred- in ponapenjanje, ki se uporabljajo za armirani beton) in ima še veliko drugih uporab, ko se raztegne v žico, vključno z uporabo v industriji pnevmatik (materiali za avtomobilske plašče), industriji matic in sornikov (pritrdilni elementi), pri izdelavi ograj, trgovinskih vozičkov, jeklenih vrvi, elektrod, kablov, posteljnih vzmeti ter za vzmetenje in varjene vzmeti.
The investigation showed that the wire rod produced and sold by the Community industry in the Community, wire rod produced and sold on the domestic market in Brazil, which served as an analogue country, and wire rod produced in the PRC, the RM and Turkey and sold to the Community and sold on the domestic Turkish market have essentially the same basic physical and technical characteristics and the same basic use.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti valjanih žic, ki jih v Skupnosti proizvaja in prodaja industrija Skupnosti, valjanih žic, proizvedenih in prodajanih na domačem trgu v Braziliji, ki je primerljiva država, ter valjanih žic, ki se proizvajajo v LRK, RM in Turčiji ter prodajajo v Skupnost in na domačem turškem trgu, v bistvu enake in da je enaka tudi njihova osnovna uporaba.
All the aforementioned wire rod is therefore considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se obravnava, da so vse navedene vrste žic podobne v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
One Chinese exporting producer submitted a sampling form, MET claim and answer to the anti-dumping questionnaire in due time, but failed to reply to the deficiency letter of the Commission, even after receiving a reminder.
Obrazec za vzorčenje, zahtevek za TGO in izpolnjen vprašalnik o protidampingu je pravočasno predložil en kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik, kljub temu pa ni uspel odgovoriti na pismo o pomanjkljivostih, čeprav je prejel opomin.
The company was informed about the proposed application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation and was given the opportunity to comment.
Družba je bila obveščena o predlagani uporabi člena 18 osnovne uredbe in je imela možnost za izražanje pripomb.
The company claimed that the Commission had granted them too short deadlines for them to be able to submit full information in their submissions and to cooperate.
Družba je trdila, da je bil rok, ki ga je določila Komisija, prekratek, da bi lahko v odgovorih predložila informacije v celoti in sodelovala.
Based on the fact that the company did not indicate to the Commission any time constraints within the applied deadlines, it was considered that no decisive arguments were submitted or evidence provided to reverse the decision to apply Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi dejstva, da družba Komisiji ni navedla nobenih ovir v zvezi z uporabljenimi roki, se je obravnavalo, da se odločilni argumenti ali dokazi, s katerimi bi se lahko razveljavila odločitev o uporabi člena 18 osnovne uredbe, niso predložili.
The company made an appeal to the Hearing Officer.
Družba se je pritožila pooblaščencu za zaslišanje.
After hearing the arguments of the company and the observations of the Hearing Officer, it was confirmed that the company did not signal in good time any time constraints and consequently did not cooperate with sufficient diligence in the investigation.
Glede na argumente, ki jih je navedla družba, in ugotovitve pooblaščenca za zaslišanje je bilo potrjeno, da družba ni pravočasno sporočila nikakršnih časovnih ovir in torej v preiskavi ni sodelovala dovolj prizadevno.
It has been therefore considered appropriate to reject the information submitted by this company and base the findings on facts available.
Zato se je štelo za ustrezno, da se informacije, ki jih je predložila ta družba, zavrnejo in da ugotovitve temeljijo na razpoložljivih dejstvih.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC and the RM, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of the said Article for those producers which are found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe se v protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz LRK in RM normalna vrednost določi v skladu z odstavki 1 do 6 navedenega člena za tiste proizvajalce, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
business decisions and costs are made in response to market signals and without significant State interference; costs of major inputs substantially reflect market values,
poslovne odločitve in stroški odražajo tržne signale in se oblikujejo brez večjega vmešavanja države; stroški večjih vlaganj v glavnem odražajo tržne vrednosti,
firms have one clear set of basic accounting records which are independently audited in line with international accounting standards (IAS) and are applied for all purposes,
podjetja imajo en sam jasen seznam osnovnih računovodskih evidenc, ki se neodvisno pregledujejo v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi („MRS“) in se uporabljajo za vse namene,
there are no significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system,
odsotnost znatnih izkrivljanj, prenesenih iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva,
bankruptcy and property laws guarantee legal certainty and stability,
stečajno pravo in pravo lastninskih razmerij zagotavljata pravno varnost in stabilnost,
Following the initiation of the proceeding, two Chinese and one Moldovan exporting producers requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation and replied to the MET claim form within the given deadline.
Po začetku postopka so dva kitajska in en moldavski proizvajalec izvoznik zahtevali TGO v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe in so v danih rokih izpolnili obrazec zahtevka za TGO.
For one Chinese exporting producer, Article 18 of the basic Regulation had to be applied (see recitals (19) to (23)), and therefore its claim for MET was rejected.
Pri enem kitajskem proizvajalcu izvozniku je bilo treba uporabiti člen 18 osnovne uredbe (glej uvodne izjave (19) do (23)), zato je bil njegov zahtevek za TGO zavrnjen.
As regards the remaining Chinese exporting producer, the company could not demonstrate that it met criteria 2 and 3.
Kar zadeva drugega kitajskega proizvajalca izvoznika, družba ni mogla dokazati, da izpolnjuje merili 2 in 3.
Regarding criterion 2, it was found that several accounting policies of the company were not in line with IAS.
V zvezi z merilom 2 je bilo ugotovljeno, da več vrst računovodskih usmeritev družbe ni bilo v skladu z MRS.
These problems were found to be systemic and were not reflected in the auditors' report.
Te težave so se opredelile kot sistemske in se niso odražale v poročilu revizorjev.
Regarding criterion 3, it was found that the company was not paying the principal of certain loans, long after the term initially foreseen in the loan contracts.
V zvezi z merilom 3 je bilo ugotovljeno, da družba ni plačevala glavnice nekaterih posojil še dolgo po roku, ki je bil prvotno predviden v posojilnih pogodbah.
The company was also found to benefit from significant income tax reductions during the IP.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bila družba upravičena tudi do znatnih znižanj davka od prihodka v času OP.
Consequently, it was concluded that the Chinese exporting producer did not demonstrate that it fulfilled the conditions set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da ta kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik ni dokazal, da izpolnjuje pogoje iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
Following disclosure of the MET analysis, the Chinese exporting producer submitted a response where the company agreed on non-compliance with criterion 2 but disagreed with the negative conclusion on criterion 3.
Po razkritju analize TGO je kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik predložil odgovor, v katerem se je družba strinjala o neskladnosti z merilom 2, ni se pa strinjala z negativnim sklepom o merilu 3.
In particular, the company argued that non-repayment of the principal of a loan did not constitute a distortion carried over from the non-market economy system but a sign that the company enjoyed high credit rating.
Družba je zlasti trdila, da neodplačilo glavnice dolga ni predstavljalo izkrivljanja, prenesenega iz sistema netržnega gospodarstva, vendar je bil znak, da je družba uživala visoko bonitetno stopnjo.
After detailed examination it was found that, during the IP, the loans in question were not covered by any contract, therefore the company was under no legal obligation to pay either interest or principal.
Po podrobni proučitvi je bilo ugotovljeno, da v času OP zadevna posojila niso bila zajeta v nobeni pogodbi, zato za družbo ni bilo pravno obvezno, da plača obresti ali glavnico.