natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A third company was not able to show that it met criteria 1 to 3.
Tretja družba ni mogla dokazati, da izpolnjuje merila od 1 do 3.
Firstly, the investigation showed that there was a serious overcapacity both in terms of labour and production, despite which the company continued to invest in additional capacity.
Prvič, preiskava je pokazala, da je bil presežek zmogljivosti glede delovne sile in proizvodnje precejšen, vendar pa je družba še naprej vlagala v dodatne zmogljivosti.
It was also considered that the relatively short period of validity of its business licence could represent an obstacle for long-term business decisions and planning and is an indication of indirect interference by the State.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da bi relativno kratka veljavnost njenega obrtnega dovoljenja lahko ovirala dolgoročne poslovne odločitve in načrtovanje ter da kaže na posredno vmešavanje države.
Secondly, it was established that the accounting system of this company made no provision for bad debts; there was no clear policy regarding different fixed assets categories; there were errors in the depreciation amounts; unjustified provisions were found; and there were loans which were not supported by evidence.
Drugič, ugotovljeno je bilo, da računovodski sistem te družbe ni urejal problematičnih terjatev, da ni bilo jasne politike glede različnih kategorij osnovnih sredstev, da so se pojavile napake v amortizacijskih zneskih, da so bile ugotovljene neutemeljene rezervacije in da so obstajala posojila, ki niso bila podprta z dokazili.
All of these clearly influenced the company’s costs.
Vse to je jasno vplivalo na stroške družbe.
However, none of these issues were mentioned in the auditor’s report, thus rendering the company’s accounts and the work performed by the auditors unreliable.
Vendar pa nobena od teh zadev ni bila navedena v revizijskem poročilu, zato so se računovodska poročila družbe in delo revizorjev izkazali za nezanesljive.
The company also failed to demonstrate that it met criterion 3, where it was found that there are significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system.
Družbi tudi ni uspelo dokazati, da izpolnjuje tretje merilo, saj so bila ugotovljena precejšnja izkrivljanja, prenesena iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva.
In particular, the company failed to produce any evidence concerning its land-use rights, loans, origin of fixed assets, paid-in capital and capital increase.
Družba predvsem ni predložila nobenih dokazov glede pravic do uporabe zemljišč, posojil, izvora osnovnih sredstev, vplačanega kapitala in povečanja kapitala.
A fourth exporting producer, comprising a group of related companies could not be granted MET because it was found that the group did not fulfil criteria 1 to 3.
Četrti proizvajalec izvoznik je bila skupina povezanih družb, ki jim ni bilo mogoče odobriti TGO, saj je bilo ugotovljeno, da skupina ne izpolnjuje meril od 1 do 3.
In particular the group failed to prove that its decision-making process was free from significant State interference.
Družbi zlasti ni uspelo dokazati, da se država ni znatno vmešavala v njen postopek odločanja.
Additionally, the accounting records were not in line with international accounting standards and several accounting errors were detected which made the external audit unreliable.
Poleg tega računovodske evidence niso bile v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi, odkritih pa je bilo tudi več računovodskih napak, zaradi katerih je bila zunanja revizija nezanesljiva.
Furthermore, there were distortions carried over from the non-market economy system, in particular regarding transfer of ownership and land-use rights.
Poleg tega so obstajala izkrivljanja, prenesena iz sistema netržnega gospodarstva, zlasti glede prenosa lastništva in pravic do uporabe zemljišč.
The submission made by the group after disclosure did not provide any new information or evidence to change these findings, therefore they are provisionally confirmed.
Utemeljitev družbe, predložena po razkritju, ni prinesla nobenih novih informacij ali dokazov, ki bi spremenili te ugotovitve, zato so te začasno potrjene.
Consequently, it was concluded that no Chinese exporting producer demonstrated that it fulfilled the conditions set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Posledično je bilo sklenjeno, da noben kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik ni dokazal izpolnjevanja pogojev iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, a countrywide duty, if any, is established for countries falling under the provisions of that Article, except in those cases where companies are able to demonstrate that they meet all criteria set out in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation to be granted IT.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe se za države, zajete v navedenem členu, določi dajatev na ravni države, če sploh, razen če lahko družbe dokažejo, da izpolnjujejo vsa merila iz člena 9(5) osnovne uredbe za odobritev IO.
The exporting producers which did not meet the MET criteria had also all claimed IT in the event that they were not granted MET.
Vsi proizvajalci izvozniki, ki niso izpolnjevali meril TGO, so prav tako zaprosili za IO, če jim ne bi bila odobrena TGO.
On the basis of information available, it was found that three Chinese exporting producers met all the requirements for IT as set out in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij je bilo ugotovljeno, da trije kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki izpolnjujejo vse zahteve za IO iz člena 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
However, it was concluded that the fourth exporting producer could not be granted IT, as potential State interference in its price setting could not be ruled out.
Sklenjeno pa je bilo, da četrtemu proizvajalcu izvozniku ni mogoče odobriti IO, saj pri njegovem oblikovanju cen ni bilo mogoče izključiti možnosti vmešavanja države.
According to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, in economies in transition, normal value for exporting producers not granted MET has to be established on the basis of the price or constructed value in a market economy third country (analogue country).
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe se v gospodarstvih v prehodu normalna vrednost za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim TGO ni bila odobrena, določi na podlagi cene ali konstruirane vrednosti v tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom („primerljiva država“).
In the notice of initiation, Turkey was proposed as an appropriate analogue country for the purpose of establishing normal value for the PRC.
V obvestilu o začetku postopka je bila kot ustrezna primerljiva država za določitev normalne vrednosti za LRK predlagana Turčija.
The Commission invited all interested parties to comment on this proposal.
Komisija je pozvala vse zainteresirane stranke, naj predložijo pripombe o tem predlogu.
One interested party submitted comments proposing Thailand as an alternative analogue country.
Ena zainteresirana stranka je predložila pripombe, v katerih je za alternativno primerljivo državo predlagala Tajsko.
They argued that since there was only one producer in Turkey, which was protected by anti-dumping measures, this producer had a quasi-monopoly position on the Turkish market.
Trdila je, da ker je bil v Turčiji samo en proizvajalec, ki je bil zaščiten s protidampinškimi ukrepi, je imel ta kvazimonopolen položaj na turškem trgu.
The Commission contacted known companies in Thailand as well as other third countries known to have producers of the like product.
Komisija se je obrnila na znane družbe na Tajskem in v drugih tretjih državah, za katere je bilo znano, da proizvajajo podobni izdelek.
However, no questionnaire replies were received from those producers.
Vendar pa od teh proizvajalcev ni prejela nobenih odgovorov na vprašalnik.
The producer in Turkey cooperated fully with the investigation by submitting a full questionnaire response and accepting a verification visit.
Proizvajalec v Turčiji je v celoti sodeloval v preiskavi, tako da je predložil popolnoma izpolnjen vprašalnik sprejel preveritveni obisk.
The Commission examined the claim of the interested party and concluded that Turkey met the criteria for an appropriate analogue country.
Komisija je preučila trditev zainteresirane stranke in ugotovila, da je Turčija izpolnjevala merila za ustrezno primerljivo državo.
Indeed, even though there is only one producer of the like product in this country and there are anti-dumping measures in force for imports from the PRC and Russia, imports from a variety of third countries into Turkey are substantial and account for more than 50 % of the Turkish market, thus ensuring conditions of competition on this market.
Čeprav je v tej državi le en proizvajalec podobnega izdelka in kljub protidampinškim ukrepom, ki veljajo za uvoz iz LRK in Rusije, je uvoz iz različnih tretjih držav v Turčijo precejšen in zajema več kot 50 % turškega trga ter tako zagotavlja pogoje za konkurenco na tem trgu.
In view of the above, it is therefore provisionally concluded that Turkey constitutes an appropriate analogue country in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se začasno sklene, da je Turčija ustrezna primerljiva država v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, normal value for the PRC was established on the basis of verified information received from the cooperating producer in the analogue country.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe je bila normalna vrednost za LRK določena na podlagi preverjenih informacij, ki jih je poslal sodelujoči proizvajalec v primerljivi državi.
An examination was made as to whether the domestic sales of each type of the product concerned sold in the analogue country could be regarded as having been made in the ordinary course of trade in accordance with Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation, by establishing the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers of the type in question.
Z ugotavljanjem deleža dobičkonosne prodaje zadevne vrste neodvisnim strankam se je preiskovalo, ali se domača prodaja posamezne vrste zadevnega izdelka, prodanega v primerljivi državi, lahko šteje za prodajo v običajnem poteku trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
For most of the product types, it was considered that the domestic price of those types does not provide an appropriate basis for the establishment of the normal value, since the volume of the profitable sales represented less than 10 % of the total sales volume.
Za večino vrst izdelkov je obveljalo mnenje, da domača cena teh vrst ne zagotavlja ustrezne podlage za določitev normalne vrednosti, saj je bil obseg dobičkonosne prodaje manj kot 10 % celotnega obsega prodaje.
For those types, in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, the normal value was constructed on the basis of the producer’s own cost of manufacturing plus a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative (SG&A) costs and for profit.
V skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe je bila normalna vrednost teh vrst oblikovana na podlagi proizvajalčevih lastnih stroškov proizvodnje, povečanih za ustrezni znesek za prodajne, splošne in upravne (PSA) stroške ter za dobiček.
The latter was based on the SG&A and profit for the same general category of products sold in the domestic market by the Turkish producer, according to Article 2(6)(b) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(6)(b) osnovne uredbe je normalna vrednost temeljila na prodajnih, splošnih in upravnih stroških ter dobičku za isto splošno kategorijo izdelkov, ki jih je na domačem trgu prodajal turški proizvajalec.
For one product type, for which the volume of profitable sales of a product type represented less than 80 % but more than 10 % of the total sales volume, normal value was based on the actual domestic price, calculated as weighted average of profitable sales of that type.
Za eno vrsto izdelka, pri kateri je bil obseg dobičkonosne prodaje vrste izdelka manj kot 80 %, vendar več kot 10 % celotnega obsega prodaje, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtano povprečje dobičkonosnih prodaj te vrste.
In all cases where the product concerned was exported to independent customers in the Community, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, namely on the basis of export prices actually paid or payable.
V vseh primerih, v katerih se je zadevni izdelek izvažal neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti, je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe, in sicer na podlagi izvoznih cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo.
One exporting producer made some export sales via a related importer in the Community.
Eden od proizvajalcev izvoznikov je opravil nekaj izvoza prek povezanega uvoznika v Skupnosti.
In this case the export price was constructed, pursuant to Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, on the basis of the price at which the imported products were first resold to an independent buyer, duly adjusted for all costs incurred between importation and resale, as well as a reasonable margin for SG&A and profits.
V tem primeru je bila izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe konstruirana na podlagi cene, po kateri so bili uvoženi izdelki najprej prodani neodvisnemu kupcu in bila ustrezno prilagojena za vse stroške, ki so nastali med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, ter na podlagi ustrezne stopnje za prodajne, splošne in upravne stroške in dobiček.
The related importer’s own SG&A costs were used, but the profit margin was established on the basis of the information available from cooperating unrelated importers.
Uporabljeni so bili lastni prodajni, splošni in upravni stroški povezanega uvoznika, stopnja dobička pa je bila določena na podlagi informacij, ki so jih dali na voljo sodelujoči nepovezani uvozniki.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences affecting prices and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe so se za zagotovitev poštene primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno v obliki prilagoditev ustrezno upoštevale razlike, ki vplivajo na cene in primerljivost cen.
For all investigated companies (cooperating exporting producers and the producer in the analogue country) allowances for differences in transport costs, freight and insurance costs, VAT, bank charges, packing costs, credit costs and commissions were granted where applicable and justified.
Za vse preiskane družbe (sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike in proizvajalca v primerljivi državi) so bile odobrene prilagoditve za razlike v prevoznih stroških, stroških, zavarovanju in prevoznini, DDV, bančnih stroških, stroških pakiranja ter stroških posojil in provizij, kadar je bilo to primerno in upravičeno.
Cooperating producers granted IT
Sodelujoči proizvajalci, ki jim je bila odobrena IO
The provisional weighted average dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the CIF Community frontier price, duty unpaid, are:
Začasne tehtane povprečne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, znašajo:
All other exporting producers
Vsi drugi proizvajalci izvozniki
With regard to all other Chinese exporters, the Commission first established the level of cooperation.
Komisija je v zvezi z vsemi drugimi kitajskimi izvozniki najprej ugotavljala raven sodelovanja.
A comparison was made between the total export quantities indicated in the questionnaire replies of the cooperating exporting producers and total imports from the PRC as derived from Eurostat import statistics.
Narejena je bila primerjava med celotnim obsegom izvoza, ki so ga sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki navedli v odgovorih na vprašalnike, in celotnim obsegom uvoza iz LRK, kakor je naveden v uvozni statistiki Eurostata.
The level of cooperation was found to be low, i.e. 24 %.
Ugotovljena stopnja sodelovanja je bila nizka, tj. 24-odstotna.
It was therefore considered appropriate to determine the countrywide dumping margin as the weighted average of (i) the dumping margin found for the cooperating exporter to which neither MET nor IT was granted, and (ii) the highest dumping margins for representative product types of the same exporter, since there were no indications that the non-cooperating exporting producers dumped at a lower level.
Zato je veljalo za primerno, da se stopnja dampinga na ravni države določi kot tehtano povprečje (i) stopnje dampinga, ugotovljene za sodelujočega izvoznika, ki mu nista bila odobrena niti TGO niti IO, in (ii) najvišjih stopenj dampinga za reprezentativne vrste izdelke istega izvoznika, saj ni bilo nobenih znakov, da bi proizvajalci izvozniki, ki niso sodelovali, izvajali damping po nižji stopnji.
On this basis, the countrywide level of dumping was provisionally established at 50,2 % of the CIF Community frontier price, duty unpaid.
Na tej podlagi je bila stopnja dampinga na ravni države začasno določena na 50,2 % cene CIF meja Skupnosti, brez plačane dajatve.
Given the definition of Community industry (CI) as set out in Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation, the output of the following Community producers was considered for establishing the volume of Community production:
Po definiciji industrije Skupnosti (IS) iz člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe je bila za določitev obsega proizvodnje Skupnosti upoštevana proizvodnja naslednjih proizvajalcev Skupnosti:
eleven producers on whose behalf the complaint was lodged,
enajstih proizvajalcev, v imenu katerih je bila vložena pritožba,
seven producers which supported the proceeding,
sedmih proizvajalcev, ki so podprli postopek,
four other Community producers listed in the complaint, which provided data on their production and sales but were neither complainants nor supporting the proceeding but did not oppose the present investigation.
štirih drugih proizvajalcev Skupnosti, navedenih v pritožbi, ki so zagotovili podatke o svoji proizvodnji in prodaji, a niso bili niti pritožniki niti niso podprli postopka, niso pa nasprotovali sedanji preiskavi.
Consequently, CI consists of these 22 companies for the purpose of the injury analysis as a whole.
IS za namene celotne analize škode tako vključuje teh 22 družb.
Seven companies among the 11 Community producers supporting the complaint were selected for the sample on the basis of the representativeness of their sales volumes, their various product types and their location in the Community.
Med enajstimi proizvajalci Skupnosti, ki so podprli pritožbo, je bilo za vzorec izbranih sedem družb na podlagi reprezentativnosti njihovega obsega prodaje, raznolikosti njihovih vrst izdelkov in njihove lokacije v Skupnosti.
However, one of the companies originally selected for the sample did not cooperate with the sampling exercise by completing the questionnaire sent to them.
Vendar pa ena od prvotno izbranih družb za vzorec ni sodelovala pri vzorčenju, saj ni izpolnila vprašalnika, ki ji je bil poslan.
They were therefore excluded from the sample and were replaced by a company supporting the complaint, which was the third most representative company in terms of sales volumes.
Zato je bila izključena iz vzorca in nadomeščena z družbo, ki je podprla pritožbo in je bila tretja najbolj reprezentativna družba glede na obseg prodaje.
These seven cooperating Community producers accounted for 51 % of the total production of the Community industry.
Teh sedem sodelujočih proizvajalcev Skupnosti je knjižilo 51 % celotne proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti.
In view of the fact that sampling was used with regard to the Community industry, injury has been assessed on the basis of trends concerning production, production capacity, capacity utilisation, employment, productivity, sales, market share and growth collected at the level of the total Community industry and trends concerning prices, profitability, cash flow, ability to raise capital and investments, stocks, return on investment and wages collected at the level of the sampled Community producers.
Upoštevajoč dejstvo, da je bilo za industrijo Skupnosti uporabljeno vzorčenje, je bila škoda ocenjena na podlagi gibanj v zvezi s proizvodnjo, proizvodno zmogljivostjo, izkoriščenostjo zmogljivosti, zaposlovanjem, produktivnostjo, prodajo, tržnim deležem in rastjo, zbranih na ravni celotne industrije Skupnosti, in gibanj v zvezi s cenami, dobičkonosnostjo, denarnim tokom, zmožnostjo zbiranja kapitala in naložb, zalogami, dobičkonosnostjo naložb in plačami, zbranih na ravni vzorčenih proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
Community consumption was established on the basis of the sales volumes of the sampled Community industry, the sales data provided by the supporting Community producers, the sales data provided by the other Community producers and the import volume data on the Community market obtained from Eurostat.
Potrošnja Skupnosti je bila določena na podlagi obsega prodaje vzorčene industrije Skupnosti, podatkov o prodaji, ki so jih predložili spremljajoči proizvajalci Skupnosti, in podatkov o obsegu uvoza na trg Skupnosti, pridobljenih od Eurostata.
Community consumption in tonnes
Potrošnja Skupnosti v tonah
During the period considered, Community consumption increased by 17 % from 903541 tonnes in 2004 to 1054236 tonnes in the IP.
V obravnavanem obdobju se je potrošnja Skupnosti povečala za 17 % z 903541 ton v letu 2004 na 1054236 ton v OP.
The rise in Community consumption may be explained by the increasing demand in the construction sector and the recovery of the steel sector itself.
To povečanje potrošnje Skupnosti je mogoče razložiti z večjim povpraševanjem v gradbenem sektorju in oživitvijo samega jeklarskega sektorja.
Imports from the PRC in tonnes
Uvoz iz LRK v tonah
During the period considered, the volume of imports of the product concerned into the Community increased massively, growing from 3940 tonnes in 2004 to 86918 tonnes in the IP, reflecting an increase of 2106 %.
V obravnavanem obdobju se je obseg uvoza zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost močno povečal s 3940 ton v letu 2004 na 86918 ton v OP, kar je odsevalo 2106-odstotno povečanje.
The period from 2005 to 2006 showed the biggest increase where imports grew by a massive 271 %.
V obdobju od leta 2005 do leta 2006 je bila rast največja, saj se je uvoz povečal za precejšnjih 271 %.
The market share of the Chinese imports, expressed as a percentage of the Community consumption, increased from 0,4 % to 8,2 % in the IP.
Tržni delež kitajskega uvoza, izražen kot odstotek potrošnje Skupnosti, se je v OP z 0,4 % povečal na 8,2 %.
Average import price from the PRC EUR/tonne
Povprečna uvozna cena iz LRK v EUR/tono
Over the period considered, the average import price of the product concerned from the PRC decreased sharply from EUR 1238/tonne in 2004 to EUR 683/tonne in the IP, i.e. by over 45 %.
V obravnavanem obdobju se je povprečna uvozna cena zadevnega izdelka iz LRK v OP močno znižala s 1238 EUR/tono v letu 2004 na 683 EUR/tono, tj. za več kot 45 %.
A comparison between the sampled Community industry’s ex-works prices to unrelated customers on the Community market with the CIF Community frontier prices of exporting producers in the PRC, duly adjusted for unloading and customs clearance costs, showed price undercutting of 18 % on average.
Primerjava med franko cenami vzorčene industrije Skupnosti za nepovezane stranke na trgu Skupnosti in cenami CIF meja Skupnosti proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK, ustrezno prilagojenimi glede na stroške raztovarjanja in carine, je pokazala v povprečju 18-odstotno nelojalno nižanje cen.
Pursuant to Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, the examination of the impact of the dumped imports from the PRC on the Community industry included an analysis of all relevant economic factors having a bearing on the state of the industry from 2004 to the IP.
V skladu s členom 3(5) osnovne uredbe je proučitev učinka dampinškega uvoza iz LRK na industrijo Skupnosti vključevala analizo vseh ustreznih gospodarskih dejavnikov, ki zadevajo stanje industrije od leta 2004 do OP.
Production volume in tonnes
Obseg proizvodnje v tonah
Capacity utilisation in %
Izkoriščenost zmogljivosti v %