natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The report was submitted on 21 October 2005 and emphasised that the principles of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 should be maintained.
Poročilo je bilo predloženo dne 21. oktobra 2005 in poudarja, da bi bilo treba načela Uredbe (ES) št. 1774/2002 ohraniti.
In addition, it highlighted the areas where amendments to that Regulation were considered necessary, in particular clarifications as regards the applicability of the rules to finished products, the relationship with other Community legislation and the classification of certain material.
Poleg tega je izpostavilo področja, za katera so v navedeni uredbi potrebne spremembe, zlasti pojasnitve glede uporabnosti pravil za končne proizvode, povezave z drugo zakonodajo Skupnosti in razvrstitvijo nekaterih snovi.
The findings of a series of fact-finding missions carried out in the Member States by the Food and Veterinary Office of the Commission (FVO) in 2004 and 2005 support those conclusions.
Ugotovitve vrste misij za ugotavljanje dejstev, ki jih je izvedel Urad Komisije za prehrano in veterinarstvo (FVO) v državah članicah v letih 2004 in 2005, podpirajo te sklepe.
According to the FVO, improvements are necessary as regards the traceability of the flow of animal by-products and the effectiveness and harmonisation of official controls.
Po mnenju FVO so potrebna izboljšanja glede sledljivosti toka živalskih stranskih proizvodov ter učinkovitosti in usklajevanja uradnega nadzora.
The Scientific Steering Committee, which was superseded by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in 2002, has adopted a number of opinions concerning animal by-products.
Znanstveni upravljalni odbor, ki ga je leta 2002 nasledila Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (EFSA), je sprejel vrsto mnenj glede živalskih stranskih proizvodov.
Those opinions demonstrate the need to maintain the main principles of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002; in particular that animal by-products derived from animals shown not to be fit for human consumption as a result of a health inspection should not enter the feed chain.
Navedena mnenja kažejo potrebo po ohranitvi glavnih načel Uredbe (ES) št. 1774/2002; zlasti da v krmno verigo ne smejo vstopati živalski stranski proizvodi, pridobljeni iz živali, za katere je bilo ob pregledu zdravstvenega stanja ugotovljeno, da niso primerne za prehrano ljudi.
However, those animal by-products may be recovered and used for the production of technical or industrial products under specified health conditions.
Vendar se navedeni živalski stranski proizvodi lahko predelajo in uporabijo za proizvodnjo tehničnih ali industrijskih proizvodov pod posebnimi zdravstvenimi pogoji.
The conclusions of the Presidency of the Council on the Commission report of 21 October 2005 which were adopted in December 2005, and the subsequent consultations carried out by the Commission, have highlighted that the rules laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 should be improved.
Sklepi predsedstva Sveta o poročilu Komisije z dne 21. oktobra 2005, ki so bili sprejeti decembra 2005, in nadaljnja posvetovanja, ki jih je izvedla Komisija, so poudarili, da bi bilo treba pravila iz Uredbe št. 1774/2002 izboljšati.
The chief objectives of the rules on animal by-products, namely the control of risks to public and animal health and the protection of the safety of the food and feed chain, should be clearly laid down.
Jasno bi bilo treba določiti glavne cilje pravil o živalskih stranskih proizvodih, in sicer glede nadzora tveganja za javno zdravje in zdravje živali ter zaščite varnosti prehranske in krmne verige.
The provisions of this Regulation should permit the achievement of those objectives.
Določbe te uredbe bi morale omogočiti dosego navedenih ciljev.
The rules on animal by-products laid down in this Regulation should apply to products that may not be used for human consumption under Community legislation, in particular where they do not comply with food hygiene legislation or where they may not be placed on the market as food since they are unsafe either because they are injurious to health or unfit for human consumption (animal by-products ‘by law’).
Pravila o živalskih stranskih proizvodih iz te uredbe bi se morala uporabljati za proizvode, ki se po zakonodaji Skupnosti ne smejo uporabljati za prehrano ljudi, zlasti kadar niso v skladu z zakonodajo o higieni živil ali kadar se ne smejo dati na trg kot živila, ker so nevarna zaradi škodljivosti za zdravje ali neprimernosti za prehrano ljudi (živalski stranski proizvodi „po zakonu“).
Those rules should, however, also apply to products of animal origin which do comply with certain rules regarding their possible use for human consumption, or which are raw materials for the production of products for human consumption, even if they are eventually destined for other purposes (animal by-products ‘by choice’).
Navedena pravila pa bi se morala uporabljati tudi za proizvode živalskega izvora, ki so v skladu z določenimi pravili glede njihove možne uporabe za prehrano ljudi ali ki so surovine za proizvodnjo proizvodov za prehrano ljudi, čeprav so navsezadnje namenjeni za druge uporabe (živalski stranski proizvodi „po izbiri“).
In addition, in order to prevent risks arising from wild animals, bodies or parts of bodies of such animals suspected of being infected with a transmissible disease should be subject to the rules laid down in this Regulation.
Poleg tega bi se morala za preprečitev tveganj, ki izhajajo iz prosto živečih živali, za katere se sumi, da so bile okužene s prenosljivimi boleznimi, za telesa ali dele teles teh živali, uporabljati pravila iz te uredbe.
This inclusion should not imply an obligation to collect and dispose of bodies of wild animals that have died or that are hunted in their natural habitat.
Ta vključitev ne bi smela pomeniti obveznosti zbiranja in odstranjevanja teles prosto živečih živali, ki so poginile ali bile ulovljene v svojem naravnem habitatu.
If good hunting practices are observed, intestines and other body parts of wild game may be disposed of safely on site.
Če se upošteva dobra lovska praksa, se lahko črevesje in drugi deli telesa divjadi varno odstranijo na kraju samem.
Such practices for the mitigation of risks are well-established in Member States and are in some cases based on cultural traditions or on national legislation which regulates the activities of hunters.
Takšne prakse za zmanjševanje tveganj so v državah članicah dobro uveljavljene in v nekaterih primerih temeljijo na kulturnih tradicijah ali na nacionalni zakonodaji, ki ureja dejavnosti lovcev.
Community legislation, in particular Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin [4], lays down rules for handling of meat and animal by-products from wild game.
Zakonodaja Skupnosti, zlasti Uredba (ES) št. 853/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o posebnih higienskih pravilih za živila živalskega izvora [4] določa pravila za ravnanje z mesom in živalskimi stranskimi proizvodi divjadi.
Those rules also place the responsibility for the prevention of risks on trained persons such as hunters.
Ta pravila ravno tako prenesejo odgovornost za preprečevanje tveganja na usposobljene osebe, kot so lovci.
In view of the potential risks for the food chain, animal by-products from killed wild game should only be subject to this Regulation in so far as food hygiene legislation applies to the placing on the market of such game and involves operations carried out by game-handling establishments.
Glede na možna tveganja za prehransko verigo naj bi za živalske stranske proizvode ubite divjadi veljala ta uredba le, če se za dajanje na trg takšne divjadi uporablja zakonodaja o higieni živil in vključuje operacije, ki jih opravijo obrati za ravnanje z divjadjo.
In addition, animal by-products for the preparation of game trophies should be covered by this Regulation in order to prevent animal health risks arising from such by-products.
Poleg tega bi morala živalske stranske proizvode za pripravo lovskih trofej urejati ta uredba, da bi se preprečila tveganja za zdravje živali, ki izhajajo iz takih stranskih proizvodov.
The rules laid down in this Regulation should apply to animal by-products derived from aquatic animals, other than material from vessels operating under Community food hygiene legislation.
Pravila iz te uredbe bi se morala uporabljati za živalske stranske proizvode, pridobljene iz vodnih živali, razen snovi z ladij, ki delujejo v skladu zakonodajo Skupnosti o higieni živil.
However, risk-proportionate measures should be adopted as regards the handling and disposal of material which arises on board fishing vessels from the evisceration of fish and which shows signs of disease.
Zlasti bi bilo treba sprejeti ukrepe, ki ustrezajo tveganju v zvezi z ravnanjem in odstranjevanjem snovi, ki nastanejo na krovu ribiških plovil pri odstranitvi notranjih organov rib, ki kažejo znake bolezni.
Such measures for the implementation of this Regulation should be adopted on the basis of a risk assessment carried out by the appropriate scientific institution in view of the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of certain measures to combat the spread of diseases communicable to humans, in particular of certain parasites.
Takšne ukrepe za izvajanje te uredbe bi bilo treba sprejeti na podlagi ocene tveganja, ki jo izvede ustrezna znanstvena ustanova glede na razpoložljive dokaze v zvezi z učinkovitostjo določenih ukrepov za preprečevanje širjenja bolezni, ki se prenašajo na ljudi, zlasti določenih parazitov.
Due to the limited risks arising from materials used as raw pet food on farm or supplied to end users by food businesses, certain activities related to such raw pet food should not be covered by the rules laid down in this Regulation.
Zaradi omejenih tveganj, ki jih povzročajo snovi, uporabljene kot surova hrana za hišne živali na kmetiji, ali ki jih upravljavci živilskih obratov dobavijo končnim porabnikom, se pravila iz te uredbe ne bi smela uporabljati za določene dejavnosti, povezane s to surovo hrano za hišne živali.
It is appropriate to clarify in this Regulation which animals are to be classified as pet animals, so that by-products derived from such animals are not used in feed for farmed animals.
Primerno je v tej uredbi pojasniti, katere živali se razvrstijo kot hišne živali, tako da se živalski stranski proizvodi iz takšnih živali ne uporabijo kot krma za rejne živali.
In particular, animals kept for purposes other than farming, such as for companionship, should be classified as pet animals.
Zlasti živali, ki jih gojijo za namene, ki niso rejni, kot so na primer hišni ljubljenčki, bi se morali šteti za hišne živali.
For the sake of consistency of Community legislation, certain definitions set out in Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies [5] and in Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste [6] should be used in this Regulation.
Zaradi skladnosti zakonodaje Skupnosti bi bilo treba v tej uredbi uporabiti določene opredelitve pojmov iz Uredbe (ES) št. 999/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. maja 2001 o določitvi predpisov za preprečevanje, nadzor in izkoreninjenje nekaterih transmisivnih spongiformnih encefalopatij [5] ter Direktive 2008/98/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. novembra 2008 o odpadkih [6].
The reference to Council Directive 86/609/EEC of 24 November 1986 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes [7] should be clarified.
Treba bi bilo pojasniti sklicevanje na Direktivo Sveta 86/609/EGS z dne 24. novembra 1986 o približevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o varstvu živali, ki se uporabljajo za poskusne in druge znanstvene namene [7].
For the sake of consistency of Community legislation, the definition of ‘aquatic animal’ as laid down in Council Directive 2006/88/EC of 24 October 2006 on animal health requirements for aquaculture animals and products thereof, and on the prevention and control of certain diseases in aquatic animals [8] should be used in this Regulation.
Zaradi skladnosti zakonodaje Skupnosti bi bilo treba v tej uredbi uporabiti opredelitev pojma „vodnih živali“ kot je določena v Direktivi Sveta 2006/88/ES z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o zahtevah za zdravstveno varstvo živali in proizvodov iz ribogojstva ter o preprečevanju in nadzoru nekaterih bolezni pri vodnih živalih [8].
At the same time, aquatic invertebrates which are not covered by that definition and which pose no risk of disease transmission should be subject to the same requirements as aquatic animals.
Hkrati pa bi morale za vodne nevretenčarje, ki niso zajeti v tej opredelitvi in ne predstavljajo tveganja za prenos bolezni, veljati enake zahteve kot za vodne živali.
Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste [9] specifies the conditions for the issuing of a permit for a landfill.
Direktiva Sveta 1999/31/ES z dne 26. aprila 1999 o odlaganju odpadkov na odlagališčih [9] določa pogoje za izdajo dovoljenja za odlagališče.
This Regulation should provide for the disposal of animal by-products on landfills for which such a permit has been issued.
Ta uredba bi morala zagotoviti odstranjevanje živalskih stranskih proizvodov na odlagališčih, za katere je bilo izdano takšno dovoljenje.
The primary responsibility for carrying out operations in accordance with this Regulation should rest with operators.
Glavno odgovornost za izvajanje operacij v skladu s to uredbo bi morali imeti nosilci dejavnosti.
At the same time, the public interest in preventing risks to public and animal health requires that a collection and disposal system is in place to ensure the safe use or the safe disposal of animal by-products which may not be used, or which are not used for economic reasons.
Istočasno pa javni interes pri preprečevanju tveganj za javno zdravje in zdravje živali zahteva vzpostavitev sistema za zbiranje in odstranjevanje za zagotovitev varne uporabe ali varnega odstranjevanja živalskih stranskih proizvodov, ki se ne smejo uporabiti ali se ne uporabljajo iz ekonomskih razlogov.
The scope of the collection and disposal system should take into account the actual amount of animal by-products which accrue in the particular Member State.
Za obseg sistema zbiranja in odstranjevanja bi bilo treba upoštevati dejansko količino živalskih stranskih proizvodov, ki se v posameznih državah članicah povečuje.
It should also reflect, on a precautionary basis, the need for extended disposal capacities in the event of major outbreaks of transmissible diseases or of temporary technical failures in an existing disposal facility.
Previdnostno bi bilo treba upoštevati tudi potrebo po razširjenih odstranjevalnih zmogljivostih v primerih večjih izbruhov prenosljivih bolezni ali začasnih tehničnih okvar v obstoječih objektih za odstranjevanje.
Member States should be permitted to cooperate with each other and third countries provided that the objectives of this Regulation are met.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba dovoliti, da sodelujejo med seboj in tretjimi državami, pod pogojem da so cilji te uredbe doseženi.
It is important to determine the starting point in the life cycle of animal by-products from which the requirements of this Regulation should apply.
Pomembno je, da se v življenjskem ciklusu živalskih stranskih proizvodov določi točka od katere bi se morale začeti uporabljati zahteve te uredbe.
Once a product has become an animal by-product, it should not re-enter the food chain.
Ko proizvod postane živalski stranski proizvod, ne bi smel ponovno vstopiti v prehransko verigo.
Special circumstances apply for the handling of certain raw materials, such as hides, handled in establishments or plants integrated at the same time into the food chain and the animal by-products chain.
Posebne okoliščine se uporabljajo za ravnanje z določenimi surovinami, kot so kože, obdelane v obratih ali objektih, ki so istočasno vključeni v prehransko verigo in verigo živalskih stranskih proizvodov.
In those cases, the necessary measures should be taken by means of segregation to mitigate potential risks for the food chain which can arise from cross-contamination.
V teh primerih bi bilo treba sprejeti potrebne ukrepe, da se s pomočjo ločevanja ublažijo morebitna tveganja za prehransko verigo, ki jih lahko povzroči navzkrižna kontaminacija.
For other establishments, risk-based conditions should be determined to prevent cross-contamination, in particular through separation between the animal by-products chain and the food chain.
Za druge obrate bi bilo treba določiti pogoje, ki temeljijo na tveganju, da bi se zlasti z ločevanjem verige živalskih stranskih proizvodov in prehranske verige preprečila navzkrižna kontaminacija.
For reasons of legal certainty and proper control of potential risks, an end point in the manufacturing chain should be determined for products which no longer have direct relevance for the safety of the feed chain.
Zaradi pravne varnosti in ustreznega nadzora možnih tveganj bi bilo treba določiti končno točko v proizvodni verigi za proizvode, ki nimajo neposrednega pomena za varnost krmne verige.
For certain products regulated under other Community legislation, such an end point should be determined at the stage of manufacturing.
Za določene proizvode, ki jih ureja druga zakonodaja Skupnosti, bi bilo treba takšno končno točko določiti v stopnji proizvodnje.
Products which have reached this end point should be exempt from controls under this Regulation.
Proizvode, ki so dosegli to končno točko, bi bilo treba v skladu s to uredbo izvzeti iz nadzora po tej uredbi.
In particular, products beyond the end point should be allowed to be placed on the market without restriction under this Regulation and to be handled and transported by operators which have not been approved or registered in accordance with this Regulation.
Zlasti bi bilo treba omogočiti, da se proizvode po končni točki lahko da na trg brez omejitev iz te uredbe, z njimi pa ravnajo in jih prevažajo nosilci dejavnosti, ki niso bili odobreni ali registrirani v skladu s to uredbo.
However, it should be possible to modify such an end point, particularly in the case of newly emerging risks.
Vendar pa bi bilo treba omogočiti, da se takšna končna točka lahko spremeni, zlasti v primeru novo-nastajajočih tveganj.
Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 exempts certain products, notably guano, certain hides to which particular forms of treatment such as tanning have been applied, and certain game trophies from its requirements.
Uredba (ES) št. 1774/2002 iz svojih zahtev izvzema določene proizvode, predvsem gvano, določene živalske kože, za katere so bile uporabljene različne oblike obdelave, kot je strojenje, in določene lovske trofeje.
Similar exemptions should be provided for in the implementing measures to be adopted under this Regulation for products such as oleochemical products and the end products resulting from the production of biodiesel, under appropriate conditions.
Podobne izjeme bi bilo treba v skladu z ustreznimi pogoji zagotoviti za izvedbene ukrepe, ki jih je treba sprejeti v skladu s to uredbo za proizvode kot so oleokemični proizvodi in končni proizvodi iz proizvodnje biodizla.
In order to ensure a high level of protection of public and animal health, Member States should continue to take the necessary measures to prevent the dispatch of animal by-products from restricted areas or establishments, in particular in the event of an outbreak of a disease listed in Council Directive 92/119/EEC of 17 December 1992 introducing general Community measures for the control of certain animal diseases and specific measures relating to swine vesicular disease [10].
Za zagotovitev visoke ravni zaščite javnega zdravja in zdravja živali bi morale države članice še naprej sprejemati potrebne ukrepe za preprečevanje odpremljanja živalskih stranskih proizvodov iz območij ali obratov z omejitvami, zlasti v primerih izbruha ene od bolezni, navedenih v Direktivi Sveta 92/119/EGS z dne 17. decembra 1992 o splošnih ukrepih Skupnosti za nadzor nad določenimi živalskimi boleznimi in o posebnih ukrepih v primeru vezikularne bolezni prašičev [10].
Operations with animal by-products which give rise to a considerable degree of risk to public and animal health should only be carried out in establishments or plants which have been approved in advance for such operations by the competent authority.
Operacije z živalskimi stranskimi proizvodi, ki lahko povzročijo visoko stopnjo tveganja za javno zdravje in zdravje živali, bi bilo treba izvajati samo v obratih ali objektih, ki jih je pristojni organ že vnaprej odobrili za takšne operacije.
That condition should apply in particular to processing establishments or plants and other establishments or plants which handle or store animal by-products with a direct relevance for the safety of the feed chain.
Ta pogoj bi se moral uporabljati zlasti za predelovalne obrate ali objekte ter druge obrate ali objekte, ki ravnajo z živalskimi stranskimi proizvodi, ki so neposredno pomembni za varnost krmne verige, ali jih skladiščijo.
It should be permitted for animal by-products of more than one category to be handled in the same establishment or plant provided cross-contamination is prevented.
Treba bi bilo dovoliti, da se v istem obratu ali objektu, če je preprečena navzkrižna kontaminacija, ravna z več kot eno kategorijo živalskih stranskih proizvodov.
It should further be permitted to amend those conditions if the amount of material for disposal and processing rises due to a major outbreak of disease, provided it is ensured that the temporary use under such amended conditions does not lead to the propagation of disease risks.
Treba bi bilo tudi dovoliti, da se ti pogoji spremenijo, če je količina snovi za odstranjevanje in predelavo povečana zaradi večjega izbruha bolezni, pod pogojem, da začasna uporaba pod takšnimi spremenjenimi pogoji ne povzroči širjenja tveganja bolezni.
However, such approvals should not be necessary for establishments or plants which process or handle certain safe materials, such as products processed to such an extent that they no longer pose a risk to public and animal health.
Vendar takšne odobritve ne bi smele biti nujne za obrate ali objekte, ki predelujejo nekatere varne snovi ali ravnajo z njimi, kakor so snovi, ki so predelane do takšnega obsega, da ne povzročajo več tveganja za javno zdravje in zdravje živali.
Such establishments or plants should be registered so as to permit official control over the flow of material and ensure their traceability.
Takšne obrate ali objekte bi bilo treba registrirati, da se tako dovoli uraden nadzor nad tokom snovi in zagotovi njihova sledljivost.
That registration requirement should apply also to operators who transport animal by-products or derived products, unless they are no longer subject to any control since an end point in the chain has been determined.
Ta zahteva po registraciji bi morala veljati tudi za nosilce dejavnosti, ki prevažajo živalske stranske proizvode ali pridobljene proizvode, razen če za njih ne velja več noben nadzor, od kar je določena končna točka v verigi.
Establishments or plants should be approved following the submission of information to the competent authority and following a visit carried out on site which demonstrates that the requirements of this Regulation for the infrastructure and equipment of the establishment or plant will be met, so that any risks to public and animal health arising from the process used will be adequately contained.
Za obrate ali objekte bi bilo treba pristojnim organom za odobritev predložiti informacije in zagotoviti obisk na mestu samem, kar kaže, da bodo izpolnjene zahteve iz te uredbe glede infrastrukture in opreme obrata ali objekta, tako da bodo obvladana vsa tveganja v zvezi z javnim zdravjem in zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki izhajajo iz uporabljene predelave.