natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Prior to allowing a ship to operate, which has been granted the right to fly its flag, the Member State concerned shall take the measures it deems appropriate to ensure that the ship in question complies with the applicable international rules and regulations.
Preden se ladji, ki ji je bila dodeljena pravica za plovbo pod zastavo države članice, dovoli, da lahko začne obratovati, zadevna država članica sprejme po njenem mnenju ustrezne ukrepe, s katerimi zagotovi, da je zadevna ladja skladna z veljavnimi mednarodnimi pravili in predpisi.
In particular, it shall verify the safety records of the ship by all reasonable means.
Država članica z vsemi ustreznimi sredstvi preveri zlasti evidenco o varnosti ladje.
It shall, if necessary, consult with the losing flag State in order to establish whether any outstanding deficiencies or safety issues identified by the latter remain unresolved.
Po potrebi se posvetuje z upravo predhodne države zastave, da bi ugotovila, ali so morebitne pomanjkljivosti ali vprašanja glede varnosti, ki jih je ta uprava odkrila, še vedno nerešena.
Whenever another flag State requests information concerning a ship which was previously flying the flag of a Member State, that Member State shall promptly provide details of outstanding deficiencies and any other relevant safety-related information to the requesting flag State.
Kadar druga država zastave zaprosi za informacije o ladji, ki je prej plula pod zastavo države članice, ta država članica državi zastave, ki to zahteva, nemudoma posreduje podrobnosti o nerešenih pomanjkljivostih in druge z varnostjo povezane informacije.
Detention of a ship flying the flag of a Member State
Zadržanje ladje, ki pluje pod zastavo države članice
When the administration is informed that a ship flying the flag of the Member State concerned has been detained by a port State, it shall, according to the procedures it has established to this effect, oversee the ship being brought into compliance with the relevant IMO Conventions.
Kadar je uprava države članice obveščena, da je ladja, ki pluje pod njeno zastavo, zadržana v državi pristanišča, po postopkih, vzpostavljenih v ta namen, poskrbi, da ladja izpolnjuje ustrezne konvencijami IMO.
Member States shall ensure that at least the following information concerning ships flying their flag is kept and remains readily accessible for the purposes of this Directive:
Države članice zagotovijo, da so za ladje, ki plujejo pod njihovo zastavo, vedno na voljo naslednje informacije za namene te direktive:
particulars of the ship (name, IMO number, etc.);
podrobnosti o ladji (ime, številka IMO, itd.);
dates of surveys, including additional and supplementary surveys, if any, and audits;
datumi pregledov, vključno z morebitnimi dodatnimi in dopolnilnimi pregledi, ter možnih presoj;
identification of the recognised organisations involved in the certification and classification of the ship;
identifikacija priznanih organizacij, vključenih v postopek izdaje spričeval in klasifikacije ladij;
identification of the competent authority which has inspected the ship under port State control provisions and the dates of the inspections;
identifikacija pristojnega organa, ki je v skladu z določbami o nadzoru pomorske inšpekcije ladjo pregledal, in datumi inšpekcijskih pregledov;
outcome of the port State control inspections (deficiencies: yes or no; detentions: yes or no);
rezultat nadzornega pregleda pomorske inšpekcije (pomanjkljivosti: da ali ne, zadržanje: da ali ne);
information on marine casualties;
informacije o pomorskih nesrečah;
identification of ships which have ceased to fly the flag of the Member State concerned during the previous 12 months.
identifikacija ladij, ki so v zadnjih 12 mesecih prenehale pluti pod zastavo zadevne države članice.
Flag State auditing process
Presoja države zastave
Member States shall take the necessary measures for an IMO audit of their administration at least once every seven years, subject to a positive reply of the IMO to a timely request of the Member State concerned, and shall publish the outcome of the audit in accordance with relevant national legislation on confidentiality.
Države članice sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe, da se opravi presoja IMO v njihovih upravah vsaj enkrat na sedem let, v primeru pozitivnega odgovora IMO na pravočasen zahtevek zadevne države članice, in objavijo izid presoje v skladu z ustrezno nacionalno zakonodajo o zaupnosti.
This Article shall expire at the latest on 17 June 2017 or at an earlier date, as established by the Commission in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 10(2), if a mandatory IMO Member State Audit Scheme has entered into force.
Ta člen preneha veljati najpozneje 17. junija 2017 ali prej, na dan, ki ga določi Komisija v skladu z regulativnim postopkom iz člena 10(2), če začne veljati sistem obveznih presoj držav članic IMO.
Quality management system and internal evaluation
Sistem vodenja kakovosti in notranjega ocenjevanja
By 17 June 2012 each Member State shall develop, implement and maintain a quality management system for the operational parts of the flag State-related activities of its administration.
Do 17. junija 2012 vsaka država članica za operativne dele dejavnosti svoje uprave, ki so povezane z državo zastave, razvije, izvaja in vzdržuje sistem vodenja kakovosti.
Such quality management system shall be certified in accordance with the applicable international quality standards.
Tovrsten sistem vodenja kakovosti se potrdi v skladu z veljavnimi mednarodnimi standardi za kakovost.
Member States which appear on the black list or which appear, for two consecutive years, on the grey list as published in the most recent annual report of the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control (hereinafter the Paris MOU) shall provide the Commission with a report on their flag State performance no later than four months after the publication of the Paris MOU report.
Države članice, ki so na črni listi ali pa dve leti zapored na sivi listi, ki je objavljena v zadnjem letnem poročilu Pariškega memoranduma o soglasju glede nadzora, ki ga opravlja inšpekcija za varnost plovbe (v nadaljevanju „Pariški MOU“), Komisiji najpozneje štiri mesece po objavi poročila Pariškega MOU predložijo poročilo o svojem izvajanju nalog države zastave.
The report shall identify and analyse the main reasons for the lack of compliance that led to the detentions and the deficiencies resulting in black or grey status.
Poročilo opredeli in analizira glavne razloge za pomanjkanje skladnosti, ki je privedlo do zadržanja in pomanjkljivosti, katerih posledica je bil vpis na črno ali sivo listo.
Reports
Poročanje
Every five years, and for the first time by 17 June 2012 the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the application of this Directive.
Komisija vsakih pet let, prvič pa do 17. junija 2012 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predstavi poročilo o uporabi te direktive.
This report shall contain an assessment of the performance of the Member States as flag States.
Poročilu vsebuje oceno delovanja držav članic kot držav zastave.
The Commission shall be assisted by the Committee on Safe Seas and the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (COSS) established by Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 2099/2002.
Komisiji pomaga Odbor za varnost na morju in preprečevanje onesnaževanja z ladij (COSS), ustanovljen s členom 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 2099/2002.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 17 June 2011 at the latest.
Države članice najpozneje do 17. junija 2011 uveljavijo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo.
Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.
Države članice posredujejo Komisiji besedila temeljnih določb predpisov nacionalne zakonodaje, sprejetih na področju, ki ga ureja ta direktiva.
Opinion of the European Parliament of 29 March 2007 (OJ C 27 E, 31.1.2008, p. 140), Council Common Position of 9 December 2008 (OJ C 330 E, 30.12.2008, p. 13) and Position of the European Parliament of 11 March 2009 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje Evropskega parlamenta z dne 29. marca 2007 (UL C 27 E, 31.1.2008, str. 140), Skupno stališče Sveta z dne 9. decembra 2008 (UL C 330 E, 30.12.2008, str. 13) in Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 11. marca 2009 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
Directive 2009/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2009/22/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on injunctions for the protection of consumers' interests
o opustitvenih tožbah zaradi varstva interesov potrošnikov
Directive 98/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 1998 on injunctions for the protection of consumers' interests [3] has been substantially amended several times [4].
Direktiva 98/27/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. maja 1998 o opustitvenih tožbah zaradi varstva interesov potrošnikov [3] je bila večkrat [4] bistveno spremenjena.
Certain Directives, listed in Annex I to this Directive, lay down rules with regard to the protection of consumers' interests.
Nekatere direktive, naštete v Prilogi I k tej direktivi, določajo pravila glede varstva interesov potrošnikov.
Current mechanisms available for ensuring compliance with those Directives, both at national and at Community level, do not always allow infringements harmful to the collective interests of consumers to be terminated in good time.
Trenutni mehanizmi, ki so na voljo na nacionalni ravni in ravni Skupnosti za zagotavljanje skladnosti s temi direktivami, ne omogočajo vedno pravočasne odprave kršitev, ki škodujejo kolektivnim interesom potrošnikov.
Collective interests means interests which do not include the cumulation of interests of individuals who have been harmed by an infringement.
Kolektivni interesi pomenijo interese, ki ne vključujejo preprostega kopičenja interesov posameznikov, oškodovanih zaradi kršitve.
This is without prejudice to individual actions brought by individuals who have been harmed by an infringement.
To ne posega v individualne tožbe posameznikov, oškodovanih zaradi kršitve.
As far as the purpose of bringing about the cessation of practices that are unlawful under the national provisions applicable is concerned, the effectiveness of national measures transposing the Directives in question, including protective measures that go beyond the level required by those Directives, provided they are compatible with the Treaty and allowed by those Directives, may be thwarted where those practices produce effects in a Member State other than that in which they originate.
Glede namena preprečitve ravnanj, ki so v nasprotju z veljavnimi nacionalnimi določbami, je lahko učinkovitost nacionalnih ukrepov za prenos navedenih direktiv, vključno z zaščitnimi ukrepi, ki presegajo zaščitne ukrepe, zahtevane s temi direktivami, kadar so združljivi s Pogodbo in dovoljeni s temi direktivami, ovirana, če imajo ta ravnanja posledice v drugi državi članici in ne v tisti, v kateri imajo izvor.
Those difficulties can disrupt the smooth functioning of the internal market, their consequence being that it is sufficient to move the source of an unlawful practice to another country in order to place it out of reach of all forms of enforcement.
Te težave lahko škodujejo dobremu delovanju notranjega trga, katerih posledice so v tem, da za izognitev kakršni koli obliki uveljavitve zadostuje prestavitev izhodišča nedovoljenega ravnanja v drugo državo.
This constitutes a distortion of competition.
To predstavlja izkrivljanje konkurence.
Those difficulties are likely to diminish consumer confidence in the internal market and may limit the scope for action by organisations representing the collective interests of consumers or independent public bodies responsible for protecting the collective interests of consumers, adversely affected by practices that infringe Community law.
Te težave verjetno zmanjšujejo zaupanje potrošnikov na notranjem trgu in lahko omejijo delovanje organizacij, ki predstavljajo kolektivne interese potrošnikov, ali neodvisnih javnih organov, pristojnih za varstvo kolektivnih interesov potrošnikov, oškodovanih zaradi ravnanj, ki kršijo pravo Skupnosti.
Those practices often extend beyond the frontiers between the Member States.
Ta ravnanja pogosto presegajo meje držav članic.
There is an urgent need for some degree of approximation of national provisions designed to enjoin the cessation of the unlawful practices irrespective of the Member State in which the unlawful practice has produced its effects.
Nujno potrebno je, da se v določeni meri približajo nacionalne določbe o odpravi takšnih nedovoljenih ravnanj ne glede na to, v kateri državi članici je nedovoljeno ravnanje imelo posledice.
With regard to jurisdiction, this is without prejudice to the rules of private international law and the Conventions in force between Member States, while respecting the general obligations of the Member States deriving from the Treaty, in particular those related to the smooth functioning of the internal market.
Ob upoštevanju pristojnosti to ne posega v pravila mednarodnega zasebnega prava in veljavne konvencije med državami članicami, pri čemer spoštuje splošne obveznosti držav članic, ki izhajajo iz Pogodbe, zlasti tiste, ki se nanašajo na dobro delovanje notranjega trga.
The objective of the action envisaged can only be attained by the Community.
Cilj predvidenega ukrepa lahko doseže le Skupnost.
It is therefore incumbent on the Community to act.
Zato je zadolžena za ukrepanje.
The third paragraph of Article 5 of the Treaty makes it incumbent on the Community not to go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objectives of the Treaty.
Tretji pododstavek člena 5 Pogodbe Skupnosti nalaga, da ne sme preseči tistega, kar je potrebno za dosego ciljev Pogodbe.
In accordance with that Article, the specific features of national legal systems must be taken into account to every extent possible by leaving Member States free to choose between different options having equivalent effect.
V skladu z navedenim členom je treba, kolikor je mogoče, upoštevati posebnosti nacionalnih pravnih sistemov in pustiti državam članicam možnost, da izberejo med različnimi opcijami z enakim učinkom.
The courts or administrative authorities competent to rule on the proceedings referred to in this Directive should have the right to examine the effects of previous decisions.
Sodišča ali upravni organi iz te direktive, ki so pristojni za odločanje o pravnih sredstvih, imajo pravico preučiti posledice prejšnjih odločitev.
One option should consist in requiring one or more independent public bodies, specifically responsible for the protection of the collective interests of consumers, to exercise the rights of action set out in this Directive.
Ena opcija bi morala biti v tem, da se enemu neodvisnemu javnemu organu ali več, posebej pristojnemu za varstvo kolektivnih interesov potrošnikov, naloži izvrševanje pooblastil za ukrepanje, ki so predvideni v tej direktivi.
Another option should provide for the exercise of those rights by organisations whose purpose is to protect the collective interests of consumers, in accordance with criteria laid down by national law.
Druga opcija bi morala predvidevati, da ta pooblastila izvršujejo organizacije, katerih cilj je varstvo kolektivnih interesov potrošnikov, v skladu z merili, ki jih določa nacionalno pravo.
Member States should be able to choose between or combine these two options in designating at national level the bodies and/or organisations qualified for the purposes of this Directive.
Državam članicam bi morala biti omogočena izbira ene ali obeh opcij in na nacionalni ravni za namene te direktive imenovanje pristojnih organov in/ali organizacije.
For the purposes of intra-Community infringements the principle of mutual recognition should apply to these bodies and/or organisations.
Zaradi kršitev znotraj Skupnosti se mora za te organe in/ali organizacije uporabljati načelo vzajemnega priznavanja.
The Member States should, at the request of their national entities, communicate to the Commission the name and purpose of their national entities which are qualified to bring an action in their own country according to the provisions of this Directive.
Države članice bi morale na zahtevo njihovih nacionalnih subjektov sporočiti Komisiji ime in namen nacionalnih subjektov, ki so v njihovi državi v skladu z določbami te direktive upravičeni za vložitev tožbe.
It is the business of the Commission to ensure the publication of a list of these qualified entities in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Komisija naj zagotovi objavo seznama teh kvalificiranih subjektov v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Until a statement to the contrary is published, a qualified entity is assumed to have legal capacity if its name is included in that list.
Kvalificirani subjekt se šteje za upravičenega za vložitev tožbe, če je njegovo ime na seznamu, razen v primeru objave nasprotne izjave.
Member States should be able to require that a prior consultation be undertaken by the party that intends to bring an action for an injunction, in order to give the defendant an opportunity to bring the contested infringement to an end.
Države članice lahko predvidijo, da mora stranka, ki namerava vložiti opustitveno tožbo, predhodno izvesti posvetovanje, s čimer se toženi stranki omogoči, da preneha s sporno kršitvijo.
Member States should be able to require that this prior consultation take place jointly with an independent public body designated by those Member States.
Države članice lahko predvidijo zahtevo, da ta posvetovanja potekajo skupaj z neodvisnim javnim organom, ki ga določijo te države članice.
Where the Member States have established that there should be prior consultation, a deadline of two weeks after the request for consultation is received should be set after which, should the cessation of the infringement not be achieved, the applicant shall be entitled to bring an action, without any further delay, before the competent court or administrative authority.
V primeru, če države članice predvidijo predhodno posvetovanje, je treba določiti rok dveh tednov po prejemu zahteve po posvetovanju, po katerem lahko, če se opustitev kršitve ne doseže v tem roku, tožeča stranka brez odlašanja zadevo preda pristojnemu sodišču ali upravnemu organu.
It is appropriate that the Commission report on the functioning of this Directive and in particular on its scope and on the operation of prior consultation.
Primerno je, da Komisija predloži poročilo o delovanju te direktive ter zlasti o njenem področju uporabe in izvedbi predhodnega posvetovanja.
The application of this Directive should not prejudice the application of Community competition rules.
Uporaba te direktive na bi smela posegati v uporabo pravil Skupnosti o konkurenci.
This Directive should be without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States concerning the time limits for transposition and application in national law of the Directives set out in Annex II, Part B,
Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v obveznosti držav članic glede rokov za prenos in uporabo v nacionalnem pravu direktiv, ki so določeni v delu B Priloge II –
The purpose of this Directive is to approximate the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to actions for an injunction referred to in Article 2 aimed at the protection of the collective interests of consumers included in the Directives listed in Annex I, with a view to ensuring the smooth functioning of the internal market.
Namen te direktive je približati zakone in druge predpise držav članic o opustitvenih tožbah, navedenih v členu 2, s ciljem varstva kolektivnih interesov potrošnikov, vključenih v direktive, ki so naštete v Prilogi I, in tako zagotoviti dobro delovanje notranjega trga.
For the purposes of this Directive, an infringement means any act contrary to the Directives listed in Annex I as transposed into the internal legal order of the Member States which harms the collective interests referred to in paragraph 1.
Za namene te direktive kršitev pomeni vsako dejanje, ki je v nasprotju z direktivami, naštetimi v Prilogi I, kakor so bile prenesene v notranji pravni red držav članic, in škoduje kolektivnim interesom, navedenim v odstavku 1.
Actions for an injunction
Opustitvene tožbe
Member States shall designate the courts or administrative authorities competent to rule on proceedings commenced by qualified entities within the meaning of Article 3 seeking:
Države članice določijo sodišča ali upravne organe, pristojna za odločanje o pravnih sredstvih, ki jih vložijo kvalificirani subjekti v smislu člena 3 in se nanašajo:
an order with all due expediency, where appropriate by way of summary procedure, requiring the cessation or prohibition of any infringement;
na opustitev ali prepoved kakršne koli kršitve z zahtevano nujnostjo in po potrebi v okviru skrajšanega postopka;
where appropriate, measures such as the publication of the decision, in full or in part, in such form as deemed adequate and/or the publication of a corrective statement with a view to eliminating the continuing effects of the infringement;
po potrebi na sprejetje ukrepov, kot sta objava odločbe v polnem besedilu ali v izvlečkih v primerni obliki in/ali objava popravkov za odpravo trajajoče posledice kršitve;
in so far as the legal system of the Member State concerned so permits, an order against the losing defendant for payments into the public purse or to any beneficiary designated in or under national legislation, in the event of failure to comply with the decision within a time limit specified by the courts or administrative authorities, of a fixed amount for each day’s delay or any other amount provided for in national legislation, with a view to ensuring compliance with the decisions.
na odredbo, v kolikor to dopušča pravni sistem zadevne države članice, ki v primeru neizpolnitve odločbe v roku, ki ga določijo sodišča ali upravni organi, predvideva, da tožena stranka, ki izgubi, v javno blagajno ali upravičencu, imenovanemu po nacionalni zakonodaji, plača fiksni znesek ali vsako drugo vsoto za vsak dan zamude, ki jo predvideva nacionalna zakonodaja, da se zagotovi izpolnjevanje odločb.
This Directive shall be without prejudice to the rules of private international law with respect to the applicable law, that is, normally, either the law of the Member State where the infringement originated or the law of the Member State where the infringement has its effects.
Ta direktiva ne posega v pravila mednarodnega zasebnega prava glede veljavnega prava, tako da se običajno uporablja pravo države članice, v kateri kršitev izvira, ali pravo države članice, v kateri ima kršitev posledice.
Entities qualified to bring an action
Subjekti, upravičeni za vložitev tožb
For the purposes of this Directive, a ‘qualified entity’ means any body or organisation which, being properly constituted according to the law of a Member State, has a legitimate interest in ensuring that the provisions referred to in Article 1 are complied with, in particular:
V tej direktivi „kvalificiran subjekt“ pomeni vsak organ ali organizacijo, ustanovljen v skladu s pravom države članice, ki ima zakoniti interes, da zagotovi spoštovanje določb, navedenih v členu 1, zlasti:
one or more independent public bodies, specifically responsible for protecting the interests referred to in Article 1, in Member States in which such bodies exist; and/or
v državah članicah, v katerih obstajajo ti organi, en neodvisni javni organ ali več, posebej pristojen za varstvo interesov, navedenih v členu 1; in/ali
organisations whose purpose is to protect the interests referred to in Article 1, in accordance with the criteria laid down by the national law.
organizacije, katerih cilj je varstvo interesov, navedenih v členu 1, v skladu z merili, ki jih določa nacionalno pravo.
Intra-Community infringements
Kršitve znotraj Skupnosti