natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A full questionnaire was forwarded to the Member States concerned, whose replies were recorded, and verification and evaluation visits were made to those Member States, in accordance with the applicable Schengen evaluation procedures as set out in the Decision of the Executive Committee setting up a Standing Committee on the evaluation and implementation of Schengen (SCH/Com-ex (98) 26 def.)
Najprej so zadevnima državama članicama poslali obsežen vprašalnik, njuni odgovori pa so se zabeležili; nato so bili v skladu s schengenskimi postopki ocenjevanja na področju varstva podatkov, kakor so določeni v Sklepu Izvršnega odbora o ustanovitvi stalnega odbora Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma (SCH/Com-ex (98) 26 def.)
[2], in the area of Data Protection.(3) On 26 April 2010, the Council concluded that the conditions in this area had been fulfilled by the Member States concerned.
[2], opravljeni obiski zadevnih držav članic zaradi preveritve in ocene.(3) Svet je 26. aprila 2010 sklenil, da zadevni državi članici izpolnjujeta pogoje s tega področja.
It is therefore possible to set a date from which the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System (SIS) may apply in those Member States.
Zato je mogoče določiti datum, s katerim se schengenski pravni red, ki se navezuje na schengenski informacijski sistem (SIS), v teh dveh državah članicah lahko začne uporabljati.
The entry into force of this Decision should allow for real SIS data to be transferred to the Member States concerned.
Začetek veljavnosti tega sklepa bi moral omogočiti, da se pravi podatki SIS posredujejo zadevnima državama članicama.
Once these evaluations have been carried out, the Council should decide on the lifting of checks at the internal borders with those Member States.
Ko bo to ocenjevanje opravljeno, bi moral Svet odločiti o odpravi kontrol na notranjih mejah z zadevnima državama članicama.
A separate Council Decision should be adopted setting a date for the lifting of checks at internal borders.
Treba bi bilo sprejeti ločeni sklep Sveta, s katerim bi določili datum za odpravo kontrol na notranjih mejah.
Until the date set out in that Decision, certain restrictions on the use of the SIS should be imposed.
Do datuma, določenega s tem sklepom, bi bilo treba uvesti nekatere omejitve glede uporabe SIS.
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters’ association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [3] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point G, of Council Decision 1999/437/EC [4] on certain arrangements for the application of that Agreement.
Ta sklep predstavlja za Islandijo in Norveško razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško o pridružitvi obeh k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [3], ki sodijo na področje iz točke G člena 1 Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES [4] o nekaterih izvedbenih predpisih za uporabo navedenega sporazuma.
As regards Switzerland, this Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [5], which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point G of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999, read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/149/JHA [6] and with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/146/EC [7],
Ta sklep predstavlja za Švico razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [5], ki sodijo na področje iz točke G člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES, v povezavi s členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2008/149/PNZ [6] in členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2008/146/ES [7] –
From 15 October 2010, the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the SIS, as referred to in Annex I, shall apply to the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania amongst themselves and in their relations with the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the Republic of France, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden as well as the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway and the Swiss Confederation.
Določbe schengenskega pravnega reda, ki se navezujejo na SIS, navedene v Prilogi I, se od 15. oktobra 2010 uporabljajo v Republiki Bolgariji in Romuniji med tema državama in v njunih odnosih s Kraljevino Belgijo, Češko republiko, Kraljevino Dansko, Zvezno republiko Nemčijo, Republiko Estonijo, Helensko republiko, Kraljevino Španijo, Francosko republiko, Italijansko republiko, Republiko Latvijo, Republiko Litvo,Velikim vojvodstvom Luksemburg, Republiko Madžarsko, Malto, Kraljevino Nizozemsko, Republiko Avstrijo, Republiko Poljsko, Portugalsko republiko, Republiko Slovenijo in Slovaško republiko, Republiko Finsko in Kraljevino Švedsko ter Republiko Islandijo, Kraljevino Norveško in Švicarsko konfederacijo.
The provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the SIS, as referred to in Annex II, shall apply from the date specified therein to the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania amongst themselves and in their relations with the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the Republic of France, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden as well as the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway and the Swiss Confederation.
Določbe schengenskega pravnega reda, ki se navezujejo na SIS, navedene v Prilogi II, se od datuma, določenega v teh določbah, uporabljajo v Republiki Bolgariji in Romuniji med tema državama in v njunih odnosih s Kraljevino Belgijo, Češko republiko, Kraljevino Dansko, Zvezno republiko Nemčijo, Republiko Estonijo, Helensko republiko, Kraljevino Španijo, Francosko republiko, Italijansko republiko, Republiko Latvijo, Republiko Litvo, Velikim vojvodstvom Luksemburg, Republiko Madžarsko, Malto, Kraljevino Nizozemsko, Republiko Avstrijo, Republiko Poljsko, Portugalsko republiko, Republiko Slovenijo in Slovaško republiko, Republiko Finsko in Kraljevino Švedsko ter Republiko Islandijo, Kraljevino Norveško in Švicarsko konfederacijo.
From 29 June 2010 real SIS data may be transferred to the Member States concerned.
Pravi SIS podatki se zadevnima državama članicama lahko posredujejo od 29. junija 2010.
From 15 October 2010, the Member States concerned, like the Member States in respect of which the Schengen acquis has already been implemented, shall be able to enter data into the SIS and use SIS data, subject to the provisions of paragraph 4.
Zadevni državi članici od 15. oktobra 2010 tako kot države članice, v katerih se schengenski pravni red že izvaja, lahko vnašata podatke v SIS in podatke SIS uporabljali ob upoštevanju določb odstavka 4.
Until the date of the lifting of checks at internal borders with the Member States concerned, those Member States:
Do datuma odprave kontrol na notranjih mejah z zadevnima državama članicama ti državi članici:
shall not be obliged to refuse entry to their territory or to expel nationals of third States for whom a SIS alert has been issued by another Member State for the purposes of refusing entry;
nimata obveznosti zavrniti vstopa na svoje ozemlje držaljno tretjih držav, za katere je druga država članica v SIS razpisala ukrep zavrnitve vstopa, ali jih izgnati;
shall refrain from entering the data covered by the provisions of Article 96 of the Convention of 19 June 1990 implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the governments of the States of Benelux economic union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders (hereinafter the ‘Schengen Convention’) [8].
ne dostopata do podatkov, ki jih urejajo določbe člena 96 Konvencije z dne 19. junija 1990 o izvajanju schengenskega sporazuma z dne 14. junija 1985 med vladami držav Gospodarske unije Beneluks, Zvezne republike Nemčije in Francoske republike o postopni odpravi kontrol na skupnih mejah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Schengenska konvencija) [8].
This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta sklep se objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije
Done at Luxembourg, 29 June 2010.
V Luxembourgu, 29. junija 2010
Opinion delivered on 17 June 2010 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 17. junija 2010 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
List of the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the SIS within the meaning of Article 4(2) of the 2005 Act of Accession to be rendered applicable to the Member States concerned
Seznam določb schengenskega pravnega reda, ki se navezujejo na SIS v smislu člena 4(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2005 in ki se v zadevnih državah članicah uporabljajo
Article 64 and Articles 92 to 119 of the Schengen Convention;
člen 64 ter členi 92 do 119 Schengenske konvencije;
Decisions of the Executive Committee established by the Schengen Convention:
sklepi Izvršnega odbora, ustanovljenega s Schengensko Konvencijo:
Decision of the Executive Committee of 15 December 1997 amending the financial regulation on C. SIS (SCH/Com-ex(97)35) [1];(b) Declarations of the Executive Committee established by the Schengen Convention:
Sklep Izvršnega odbora z dne 15. decembra 1997 o spremembi finančne uredbe o C.SIS (SCH/Com-ex (97) 35) [1];(b) izjave Izvršnega odbora, ustanovljenega s Schengensko konvencijo:
Declaration of the Executive Committee of 18 April 1996 defining the concept of an alien (SCH/Com-ex (96) decl. 5) [2],
Izjava Izvršnega odbora z dne 18. aprila 1996 o opredelitvi koncepta tujca (SCH/Com/Ex (96) decl 5) [2];
Council Decision 2000/265/EC of 27 March 2000 on the establishment of a financial regulation governing the budgetary aspects of the management by the Deputy Secretary-General of the Council, of contracts concluded in his name, on behalf of certain Member States, relating to the installation and the functioning of the communication infrastructure for the Schengen environment, ‘Sisnet’ [4],
Sklep Sveta 2000/265/ES z dne 27. marca 2000 o vzpostavitvi finančne uredbe za urejanje proračunskih vidikov upravljanja pogodb s strani namestnika generalnega sekretarja Sveta, sklenjenih v imenu nekaterih držav članic v zvezi s postavitvijo in delovanjem komunikacijske infrastrukture za schengensko okolje „Sisnet“ [4];
Article 5(4)(a) and the provisions of Title II and the annexes thereto referring to the Schengen Information System (SIS) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) [9],
Člen 5(4)(a) in določbe naslova II ter prilog, ki se nanašajo na schengenski informacijski sistem (SIS), Uredbe (ES) št. 562/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. marca 2006 o Zakoniku Skupnosti o pravilih, ki urejajo gibanje oseb prek meja (Zakonik o schengenskih mejah) [9];
Council Regulation (EC) No 1104/2008 of 24 October 2008 on migration from the Schengen Information System (SIS 1+) to the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) [10],
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1104/2008 z dne 24. oktobra 2008 o migraciji s schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS 1+) na drugo generacijo schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) [10];
Council Decision 2008/839/JHA of 24 October 2008 on migration from the Schengen Information System (SIS 1+) to the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) [11].
Sklep Sveta (ES) št. 2008/839/PNZ z dne 24. oktobra 2008 o migraciji s schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS 1+) na drugo generacijo schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) [11].
The manual was amended by Commission Decisions 2006/757/EC (OJ L 317, 16.11.2006, p. 1) and 2006/758/EC (OJ L 317, 16.11.2006, p. 41).
Priročnik je bil spremenjen s Sklepom Komisije 2006/757/ES (UL L 317, 16.11.2006, str. 1) in Sklepom Komisije 2006/758/ES (UL L 317, 16.11.2006, str. 41).
List of the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the SIS within the meaning of Article 4(2) of the 2005 Act of Accession to be rendered applicable to the Member States concerned from the date provided in those provisions
Seznam določb schengenskega pravnega reda, ki se navezujejo na SIS v smislu člena 4(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2005 in ki se v zadevnih državah članicah uporabljajo od datuma, določenega v teh določbah
Decision 2007/533/JHA of the Council of 12 June 2007 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) [3].
Sklep Sveta 2007/533/PNZ z dne 12. junija 2007 o vzpostavitvi, delovanju in uporabi druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) [3].
appointing one Romanian member of the Committee of the Regions
o imenovanju romunskega člana Odbora regij
A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of term of Mr Cristian ANGHEL,
Zaradi izteka mandata Cristiana ANGHELA se je sprostilo mesto člana Odbora regij –
The following is hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions as member for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:
Za preostanek mandata, ki se izteče 25. januarja 2015, se za člana Odbora regij imenuje:
on the implementation by Member States of surveillance programmes for avian influenza in poultry and wild birds
o izvajanju programov nadzora za aviarno influenco pri perutnini in divjih pticah v državah članicah
(notified under document C(2010) 4190)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 4190)
Directive 2005/94/EC sets out measures for the control of outbreaks, in poultry and other captive birds, of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) and low pathogenic avian influenza caused by avian influenza viruses of the H5 and H7 subtypes (LPAI), as defined in that Directive.
Direktiva 2005/94/ES določa ukrepe za obvladovanje izbruhov visoko patogene aviarne influence (HPAI) in nizko patogene aviarne influence (LPAI), ki ju povzročijo virusi aviarne influence podtipov H5 in H7, kot je opredeljeno v navedeni direktivi, pri perutnini in drugih pticah v ujetništvu.
Directive 2005/94/EC also provides for certain preventive measures relating to the surveillance and the early detection of avian influenza viruses.
Direktiva 2005/94/ES določa tudi nekatere preventivne ukrepe v zvezi z nadzorom in zgodnjim odkrivanjem virusov aviarne influence.
Directive 2005/94/EC provides that compulsory surveillance programmes are to be implemented by the Member States.
Direktiva 2005/94/ES določa, da države članice izvajajo obvezne programe nadzora.
Those surveillance programmes aim at identifying the circulation of LPAI viruses in poultry, in particular in waterfowl poultry species, before they become widespread in the poultry population, so that control measures can be taken to possibly prevent a mutation into a HPAI virus which might have devastating consequences.
Cilj navedenih programov nadzora je opredelitev kroženja virusov LPAI pri perutnini, zlasti pri vodnih vrstah perutnine, preden se razširijo med populacijo perutnine, tako da se lahko sprejmejo nadzorni ukrepi za morebitno preprečitev mutacije v virus HPAI, kar bi lahko imelo hude posledice.
Directive 2005/94/EC also provides for surveillance programmes to be carried out in wild birds in order to contribute, on the basis of a regularly updated risk assessment, to the current knowledge on the threats posed by wild birds in relation to any influenza virus of avian origin in birds.
Direktiva 2005/94/ES določa tudi programe nadzora, ki jih je treba izvajati pri divjih pticah, da se na podlagi redno posodobljene ocene tveganja prispeva k obstoječemu znanju o tveganjih, ki jih predstavljajo divje ptice v zvezi s katerim koli virusom influence aviarnega izvora pri pticah.
Commission Decision 2007/268/EC of 13 April 2007 on the implementation of surveillance programmes for avian influenza in poultry and wild birds to be carried out in the Member States and amending Decision 2004/450/EC [3] was adopted in order to lay down guidelines for the implementation of such surveillance programmes.
Odločba Komisije 2007/268/EC z dne 13. aprila 2007 o izvajanju programov nadzora za aviarno influenco pri perutnini in divjih pticah v državah članicah ter o spremembi Odločbe 2004/450/ES [3] je bila sprejeta z namenom določitve smernic za izvajanje takih programov nadzora.
Since the date of adoption of that Decision, the experience gained in the Member States in carrying out surveillance programmes and advances in scientific knowledge and research conclusions, indicate that certain poultry species and poultry production categories are at a higher risk of becoming infected with avian influenza viruses than others, also taking into account the location of the holding and other risk factors.
Izkušnje, pridobljene z izvajanjem programov nadzora v državah članicah, ter nova znanstvena dognanja in ugotovitve raziskav od datuma sprejetja navedene odločbe kažejo, da za nekatere vrste perutnine in kategorije reje perutnine v primerjavi z drugimi velja višja raven tveganja okužbe z virusi aviarne influence, tudi ob upoštevanju lege kmetijskega gospodarstva in drugih dejavnikov tveganja.
The threat of the introduction of the HPAI virus of the H5N1 subtype from South East Asia to Europe by its westward spread during 2005 has prompted the adoption of additional measures for preparedness and early detection of that virus type in poultry and wild birds.
Zaradi nevarnosti vnosa virusa HPAI podtipa H5N1 iz jugovzhodne Azije v Evropo ob njegovi širitvi proti zahodu leta 2005 so bili sprejeti dodatni ukrepi za pripravljenost na bolezen in zgodnje odkrivanje navedenega tipa virusa pri perutnini in divjih pticah.
Commission Decision 2005/731/EC of 17 October 2005 laying down additional requirements for the surveillance of avian influenza in wild birds [4] requires that Member States arrange for the notification to the competent authorities of any abnormal mortality or significant disease outbreaks occurring in wild birds and in particular wild water birds.
Odločba Komisije 2005/731/ES z dne 17. oktobra 2005 o določitvi dodatnih zahtev za nadzor aviarne influence pri prosto živečih pticah [4] zahteva, da države članice zagotovijo, da se pristojni organi uradno obvestijo o vsaki nenormalni umrljivosti ali večjih izbruhih bolezni, ki se pojavijo pri divjih pticah in zlasti divjih vodnih pticah.
Sampling and laboratory testing for avian influenza virus must also be carried out.
Prav tako je treba izvesti vzorčenje in laboratorijsko testiranje prisotnosti virusa aviarne influence.
It is appropriate to include the requirements laid down in Decision 2005/731/EC in the present Decision.
V ta sklep je primerno vključiti zahteve iz Odločbe 2005/731/ES.
From 2006 to 2009, more than 350000 wild birds have been sampled and tested for avian influenza.
Od leta 2006 do leta 2009 je bilo za aviarno influenco vzorčenih in testiranih več kot 350000 divjih ptic.
On average, surveillance in Member States was carried out by sampling 75 % of live birds and 25 % of sick or dead birds.
V povprečju je bil v državah članicah nadzor izveden z vzorčenjem 75 % živih ptic in 25 % bolnih ali mrtvih ptic.
More than 1000 birds found dead or sick have tested positive for HPAI of the H5N1 subtype, while only about five birds sampled as healthy live birds tested positive for that virus during that 4-year period.
Testi za HPAI podtipa H5N1 so bili pri več kot 1000 mrtvih ali bolnih pticah pozitivni, medtem ko so bili v navedenem štiriletnem obdobju testi za navedeni virus pozitivni samo pri petih pticah, ki so bile vzorčene kot zdrave žive ptice.
LPAI subtypes were almost exclusively isolated from samples taken from live birds.
Podtipi LPAI so bili skoraj izključno izolirani od vzorcev, odvzetih živim pticam.
The conclusions drawn up in the annual reports on avian influenza surveillance [5] in the Union compiled by the EU Reference Laboratory (EURL) for avian influenza, the scientific opinions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) [6], [7], [8] and the work of the recently established Task Force on Animal Disease Surveillance (TFADS) have highlighted that certain amendments to the current surveillance strategy in poultry and wild birds should be introduced to further foster a risk-based approach which is deemed the most suitable surveillance strategy to inform competent authorities for disease prevention and control purposes aimed at protecting poultry and other captive bird holdings.
Ugotovitve iz letnih poročil o nadzoru aviarne influence [5] v Uniji, ki jih pripravlja referenčni laboratorij EU za aviarno influenco, znanstvena mnenja Evropske agencije za varnost hrane (EFSA) [6] [7] [8] ter delo nedavno ustanovljene delovne skupine za nadzor bolezni živali (TFADS) so poudarili, da je treba uvesti nekatere spremembe sedanje strategije nadzora pri perutnini in divjih pticah, da se nadalje spodbudi pristop, ki temelji na analizi tveganja in se šteje za najprimernejšo strategijo nadzora za obveščanje pristojnih organov za namene preprečevanja in obvladovanja bolezni, da se zaščitijo gospodarstva za rejo perutnine in drugih ptic v ujetništvu.
Risk-based surveillance should complement early detection systems for avian influenza infection in poultry, such as those already provided for in Article 2 of Commission Decision 2005/734/EC of 19 October 2005 laying down biosecurity measures to reduce the risk of transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza caused by Influenza virus A subtype H5N1 from birds living in the wild to poultry and other captive birds and providing for an early detection system in areas at particular risk [9] and in Chapter II(2) of the Annex to Commission Decision 2006/437/EC of 4 August 2006 approving a Diagnostic Manual for avian influenza as provided for in Council Directive 2005/94/EC [10].
Z nadzorom, ki temelji na analizi tveganja, je treba dopolniti sisteme zgodnjega odkrivanja okužbe z aviarno influenco pri perutnini, na primer tiste, ki so že določeni v členu 2 Odločbe Komisije 2005/734/ES z dne 19. oktobra 2005 o določitvi ukrepov biološke varnosti za zmanjšanje tveganja prenosa visoko patogene aviarne influence, ki jo povzroča virus influence A H5N1, s ptic, ki živijo v divjini, na perutnino in druge ptice v ujetništvu ter zagotavljanje sistema zgodnjega odkrivanja na območjih z izrazitim tveganjem [9], ter v poglavju II(2) Priloge k Odločbi Komisije 2006/437/ES z dne 4. avgusta 2006 o odobritvi diagnostičnega priročnika za aviarno influenco v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 2005/94/ES [10].
The guidelines for surveillance for avian influenza in poultry and wild birds laid down in Decision 2007/268/EC should therefore be reviewed in the light of experience and scientific insight gained and replaced by the guidelines laid down in this Decision.
Smernice za nadzor aviarne influence pri perutnini in divjih pticah iz Odločbe 2007/268/ES je zato glede na pridobljene izkušnje in znanstveni vpogled treba pregledati ter jih nadomestiti s smernicami iz tega sklepa.