natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Because of the severity of the market crisis in some countries in 2006, the Commission authorised the co-financing of 50 % of the cost of market support measures, with national budgets paying the other half.
Komisija je zaradi resnosti krize na trgih nekaterih držav v letu 2006 dovolila sofinanciranje do 50 % stroškov ukrepov za podporo trgu, preostanek pa je se je kril iz državnih proračunov.
The Commission would point out that the slump in prices suffered by the sector is not in itself an exceptional occurrence within the meaning of the Treaty.
Komisija poudarja, da padec cen v sektorju sam po sebi ni izjemen dogodek v smislu Pogodbe.
Rather, it is an economic circumstance well-known in some agricultural sectors, which is caused by various factors including an incorrect planning of supply compared with demand (cyclical falls in price in the pigmeat sector are proof of this), or by purely commercial factors, the origin of which cannot be termed an exceptional occurrence (e.g. the reorientation of consumers’ preferences to alternative products).
Prej gre za konjunkturno okoliščino, ki je dobro poznana v nekaterih kmetijskih sektorjih in je posledica številnih dejavnikov, kot so slabo načrtovanje ponudbe glede na povpraševanje (dokaz za to so ciklična padanja cen v sektorju prašičereje) ali popolnoma gospodarski dejavniki, katerih izvora ni mogoče označiti za izreden dogodek (npr. preusmeritev želja potrošnikov na nadomestne proizvode).
Similarly, the mere existence of a well-known disease such as avian influenza does not constitute an exceptional occurrence.
Tudi sam obstoj bolezni, ki je danes dobro poznana kot aviarna influenca, ne more biti izjemen dogodek.
On the contrary, the spread of the disease and the subsequent crisis of the poultry sector may, in some cases, even be a result of the failure by national authorities to apply rigorously the safety and prevention standards required to control the disease.
Nasprotno, širjenje bolezni in kriza, ki jo je to povzročilo v perutninskem sektorju, bi bila lahko v nekaterih primerih tudi posledica dejstva, da nacionalni organi nedosledno izvajajo varnostne standarde in standarde preprečevanja, ki so predpisani in nujni za nadzor nad boleznijo.
Through the market support measures proposed in the aforementioned regulations, the Commission’s intention was to deal with the problem of the negative consequences of the avian influenza crisis on the market.
Komisija je nameravala z ukrepi podpore trgu, predlaganimi v zgoraj navedenih uredbah, rešiti vprašanje negativnih posledic izbruha ptičje gripe za trg.
The Commission has therefore made very clear its intention to intervene in the crisis, entirely excluding any other measures considered to affect commercial conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Z uporabo takega instrumenta je izrazila trdno namero, da poseže v krizo, pri tem pa popolnoma izključi vsa druga posredovanja, ki naj bi spreminjala trgovinske pogoje v obsegu, ki so v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
However, the Italian authorities have provided no evidence of the reasons why the present case is any different from other cases of avian influenza which were not considered as exceptional occurrences.
Italijanski organi niso pojasnili, zakaj naj bi bil obravnavani primer drugačen od drugih primerov aviarne influence, ki se niso šteli za izjemne dogodke.
As a result, the aid proposed by the Italian authorities cannot be authorised on this legal basis: the derogations referred to in Article 87(2) are not applicable.
Pomoči, ki so jo predlagali italijanski organi, zato na tej pravni podlagi ni mogoče dovoliti: odstopanja iz člena 87(2) se ne uporabljajo.
Specifically, the provisions of paragraph (b), which state that aid to make good damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences are compatible with the common market, do not apply.
Natančneje, ne uporabljajo se določbe točke (b), na podlagi katerih je s skupnim trgom združljiva pomoč za povrnitev škode, ki so jo povzročile naravne nesreče ali izjemni dogodki.
It must be examined whether the measure proposed may be considered to be compatible with the common market within the meaning of Article 87(3) of the Treaty.
Treba je preučiti, ali se lahko predlagani ukrep šteje za združljivega s skupnim trgom v smislu člena 87(3) Pogodbe ES.
The provisions of paragraph (c) are particularly relevant. According to these, aid to facilitate the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic areas may be considered to be compatible with the common market where such aid does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Pomembne so predvsem določbe točke (c), v skladu s katerimi se za združljivo s skupnim trgom šteje pomoč za pospeševanje razvoja določenih gospodarskih dejavnosti ali določenih gospodarskih območij, kadar taka pomoč ne spreminja trgovinskih pogojev v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
Paragraph 11.4 of the guidelines governs State aid to compensate farmers for losses caused by animal diseases.
V točki 11.4 Smernic so urejene državne pomoči za nadomestila kmetovalcem, ki so utrpeli izgube zaradi bolezni živali.
These state that where a farmer loses livestock as a result of animal disease, or where his crops are affected by plant disease, this does not normally constitute a natural disaster or an exceptional occurrence within the meaning of the Treaty.
Določeno je, da če kmet izgubi živino zaradi bolezni živali, ali če njegov pridelek prizadene bolezen rastlin, to običajno ni naravna nesreča ali izjemni dogodek v smislu Pogodbe.
In such cases, aid provided in compensation for the losses incurred and aid to prevent future losses may only be permitted by the Commission on the basis of Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty, which provides that aid to facilitate the development of certain activities may be considered compatible with the common market provided that it does not affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest.
V takih primerih lahko Komisija dovoli nadomestila za izgube in pomoč za preprečevanje prihodnjih izgub le na podlagi člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe. Ta člen določa, da se lahko za združljivo s skupnim trgom šteje pomoč za pospeševanje razvoja določenih gospodarskih dejavnosti, kadar takšna pomoč ne spreminja trgovinskih pogojev v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
For this derogation to apply, the Member State must demonstrate that all the conditions for the compatibility of the proposed measures are fulfilled.
To odstopanje se lahko uporabi samo, če država članica dokaže, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za združljivost predvidenih ukrepov.
According to paragraph 1.1.4 of the guidelines, the Commission considers that the payment of aid to farmers to compensate for losses resulting from animal or plant diseases may only be accepted as part of an appropriate programme at Community, national or regional level for the prevention, control or eradication of the disease concerned.
Komisija v skladu s točko 11.4 Smernic meni, da se lahko plačilo pomoči kmetom kot nadomestilo za izgube zaradi bolezni živali ali rastlin odobri le, če je del primernega programa na ravni Skupnosti, državni ali regionalni ravni za preprečevanje, nadzor in izkoreninjenje zadevne bolezni.
Aid which simply compensates farmers for losses incurred without taking any steps to remedy the problem at source must be considered as pure operating aid, which is incompatible with the common market.
Pomoč, s katero se kmetom samo nadomestijo izgube, ni pa namenjena odpravljanju vzroka težav, je treba šteti za pomoč za tekoče poslovanje, ki je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
The Commission considers, however, that the Italian authorities did not provide sufficient evidence to justify the application of such derogation in the light of the rules applicable to State aid, in particular paragraph 11.4 of the guidelines.
Vendar Komisija meni, da italijanski organi niso zagotovili zadostnih dokazov, ki bi upravičili uporabo takega odstopanja z vidika pravil, ki se uporabljajo za državno pomoč, zlasti zgoraj navedene točke 11.4 Smernic.
Accordingly, the aid proposed by the Italian authorities cannot be authorised on this legal basis.
Zato pomoči, ki so jo predlagali italijanski organi, ni mogoče dovoliti na tej pravni podlagi.
The Italian authorities did not indicate any other measures as a legal basis for the aid.
Italijanski organi kot pravne podlage za pomoč niso navedli drugih ukrepov.
Even though the Italian authorities never referred to the application of the rescue and restructuring guidelines, for the sake of completeness, the Commission examined whether the Community Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty [22] do not apply in the present case.
Čeprav se italijanski organi niso nikjer sklicevali na uporabo smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje, bo Komisija zaradi izčrpnosti preučila, ali se v obravnavanem primeru ne uporabljajo Smernice Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah [22].
The first condition in order to qualify for rescue or restructuring aid is that the firm in question is regarded as being in difficulty within the meaning of the aforementioned guidelines.
Prvi pogoj za upravičenost do pomoči za reševanje ali prestrukturiranje je, da se za zadevno podjetje šteje, da je v težavah v smislu zgoraj navedenih smernic.
Based on the information at the Commission’s disposal, it does not appear that the firms concerned were in difficulty within the meaning of the aforementioned guidelines.
Iz informacij, ki jih ima Komisija, ne izhaja, da bi bila zadevna podjetja v težavah v smislu zgoraj navedenih smernic.
In any event, the Commission would point out that, in order to fulfil its duty to cooperate with the Commission, the Member State concerned must provide all the information necessary to enable the Commission to verify that the conditions for the derogation from which it seeks to benefit are satisfied [23].
Komisija vsekakor poudarja, da mora zadevna država članica, da bi izpolnila dolžnost sodelovanja s Komisijo, predložiti vse dokaze, na podlagi katerih lahko ta institucija preveri, ali so izpolnjeni pogoji za odstopanje, ki ga želi uporabiti.
The Italian authorities never submitted any document enabling the Commission to examine the information in the light of the guidelines, despite the indications given by the Commission in paragraph 24 of the initiation decision (paragraph 30 of the final decision).
Italijanski organi niso nikoli predložili nobenega dokumenta, na podlagi katerega bi lahko Komisija preučila podatke z vidika teh smernic, in to kljub navedbam Komisije v odstavku 24 odločitve o sprožitvi postopka (odstavek 30 končne odločbe).
In light of the foregoing, the Commission may conclude that the aid which Italy proposes granting to the poultry sector constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1), which cannot benefit from any derogation provided for in Article 87(2) and (3).
Komisija lahko ob upoštevanju navedenega ugotovi, da pomoč, ki jo Italija namerava izvesti v korist perutninskega sektorja, pomeni državno pomoč v smislu člena 87(1), ki ni upravičena do nobenega odstopanja iz člena 87(2) in (3).
Since the measure has been notified in accordance with Article 88(3) of the Treaty and the Italian authorities have not granted it, there is no need to request recovery of the aid,
Ker je bila pomoč priglašena v skladu s členom 88(3) Pogodbe in ker je italijanski organi niso izvedli, ni treba zahtevati vračila pomoči –
The State aid which Italy proposes granting in order to prevent the avian influenza is not compatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč, ki jo Italija namerava izvesti za preprečevanje aviarne influence, ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
Accordingly, the granting of the aid is not authorised.
Izvajanje navedene pomoči zato ni dovoljeno.
OJ C 233, 28.9.2006, p. 5.
UL C 233, 28.9.2006, str. 5.
Official Gazette of the Italian Republic of 30.11.2005, general series No 279, p. 44.
Uradni list Italijanske republike z dne 30. novembra 2005, splošna serija št. 279, str. 44.
Official Gazette of the Italian Republic of 26.1.2006, general series No 21, p. 50.
Uradni list Italijanske republike z dne 26. januarja 2006, splošna serija št. 21, str. 50.
Official Gazette of the Italian Republic of 11.3.2006, ordinary supplement No 58.
Uradni list Italijanske republike z dne 11. marca 2006; redni dodatek št. 58.
By letter C(2007) 3249 of 10.7.2007 for component A and by letter D(2008) 13797 of 13.5.2008 for component B (ref. AGR 11275).
Del A z dopisom C(2007) 3249 z dne 10. julija 2007 in del B z dopisom D(2008) 13797 z dne 13. maja 2008 (ref. AGR 11275).
By letter D(2005) 38372 of 12.12.2005 (ref. AGR 31606), by telex D(2006) 9256 of 20.3.2006 (ref. AGRI 7800) and by letter D(2006) 1927 of 12.4.2006 (Directorate-General for Development).
Z dopisom D(2005) 38372 z dne 12. decembra 2005 (ref. AGR 31606), s telefaksom D(2006) 9256 z dne 20. marca 2006 (ref. AGRI 7800) in z dopisom D(2006) 1927 z dne 12. aprila 2006 (Generalni direktorat za razvoj).
OJ L 119, 4.5.2006, p. 1.
UL L 119, 4.5.2006, str. 1.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 September 1980 in Case C-730/79, [1980] ECR 2671, paragraphs 11 and 12.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 17. septembra 1980, zadeva C-730/79, Recueil 1980, str. 2671, točki 11 in 12.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 21 March 1990 in Case C-142/87, [1990] ECR I-959, paragraph 43, and Judgment of 14 September 1994 in Joined Cases C-278/92 and C-280/92, [1994] ECR I-4103, paragraphs 40 to 42.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 21. marca 1990, zadeva C-142/87, Recueil 1990, str. I-959, točka 43, in sodba z dne 14. septembra 1994, združeni zadevi C-278/92 in C-280/92, Recueil 1994, str. I-4103, točke od 40 do 42.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 11 November 2004 in Case C-73/03 Spain v Commission paragraph 37, and Judgment of 23 February 2006 in Joined Cases C-346/03 and C-529/03 Giuseppe Atzeni and Others, paragraph 79.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 11. novembra 2004 v zadevi Španija proti Komisiji, C-73/03, točka 37, in sodba z dne 23. februarja 2006 v združenih zadevah Giuseppe Atzeni in drugi, C-346/03 in C-529/03, točka 79.
In particular for aid to farmers affected by the BSE crisis. See letter D(2001) 290558 of 27.7.2001 (ref. AGR 25807) case NN46/01, letter D(2001) 292096 of 9.11.2001 (ref. AGR 37860) case N 657/01, and letter D(2001) 290526 of 27.7.2001 (ref. AGR 25798) case N 437/01.
Zlasti pri pomočeh rejcem, ki jih je prizadela kriza zaradi BSE – glej dopis D(2001) 290558 z dne 27. julija 2001 (ref. AGR 25807) zadeva NN46/01, dopis D(2001) 292096 z dne 9. novembra 2001 (ref. AGR 37860) zadeva N 657/01, in dopis D(2001) 290526 z dne 27. julija 2001 (ref. AGR 25798) zadeva N 437/01.
Avian influenza is also an International Office of Epizootics (OIE) listed disease.
Navedena je tudi med „Boleznimi s seznama Svetovne organizacije za zdravje živali (OIE)“.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 June 2005 in Case T-171/02 Regione autonoma della Sardegna v Commission [2005] ECR II-2123, paragraph 129.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 15. junija 2005 v zadevi Regione autonoma della Sardegna proti Komisiji, T-171/02, ZOdl., str. II-2123, točka 129.
EUR/kg
zamrznjenega mesa
The Italian authorities did not provide any information to justify these measures in the light of State aid rules, in particular paragraph 11.4 of the guidelines [12] and the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty. [13] The Commission could not therefore rule out the possibility of this aid constituting operating aid, i.e. aid designed to relieve an undertaking of costs which it would normally have to pay in the course of its day-to-day business or its normal activities.
Italijanski organi niso predložili informacij, s katerimi bi bilo mogoče navedene ukrepe upravičiti z vidika pravil, ki veljajo na področju državnih pomoči, zlasti z vidika točke 11.4 Smernic [12] in Smernic Skupnosti o državnih pomočeh za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah [13] Komisija zato ni mogla izključiti, da bi lahko načrtovana pomoč pomenila pomoč za tekoče poslovanje, povedano drugače, pomoč, katere namen je podjetje razbremeniti stroškov, ki bi jih navadno imelo v okviru tekočega poslovanja oziroma rednih dejavnosti.
amending Decision 2004/211/EC as regards the entries for Bahrain and Brazil in the list of third countries and parts thereof from which the introduction into the European Union of live equidae and semen, ova and embryos of the equine species are authorised
o spremembi Odločbe 2004/211/ES glede vnosov za Bahrajn in Brazilijo na seznamu tretjih držav in delov tretjih držav, iz katerih je dovoljen vnos živih kopitarjev in semena, jajčnih celic in zarodkov vrste kopitarji v Evropsko unijo
(notified under document C(2010) 3665)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 3665)
Having regard to Council Directive 90/426/EEC of 26 June 1990 on animal health conditions governing the movement and import from third countries of equidae [1], and in particular Article 12(1) and (4), and the introductory phrase of Article 19 and Article 19(i) and (ii) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 90/426/EGS z dne 26. junija 1990 o pogojih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki ureja premike in uvoz kopitarjev iz tretjih držav [1], in zlasti člena 12(1) in (4), uvodnega stavka člena 19 ter točk (i) in (ii) člena 19 Direktive,
Directive 90/426/EEC lays down animal health conditions for the importation into the Union of live equidae.
Direktiva 90/426/EGS določa pogoje v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali pri uvozu živih kopitarjev v Unijo.
It provides that imports of equidae into the Union are only authorised from third countries or parts of the territory thereof, which have been free from glanders for a period of at least 6 months.
Direktiva določa, da je uvoz kopitarjev v Unijo dovoljen le iz tretjih držav ali delov tretjih držav, kjer vsaj 6 mesecev ni smrkavosti.
Commission Decision 2004/211/EC of 6 January 2004 establishing the list of third countries and parts of territory thereof from which Member States authorise imports of live equidae and semen, ova and embryos of the equine species [3] establishes a list of third countries, or parts thereof where regionalisation applies, from which Member States authorise the importation of equidae and semen, ova and embryos thereof, and indicates the other conditions applicable to such imports.
Z Odločbo Komisije 2004/211/ES z dne 6. januarja 2004 o uvedbi seznama tretjih držav in delov njihovega ozemlja, s katerih države članice dovolijo uvoz živih kopitarjev in semena, jajčnih celic in zarodkov vrste kopitarji [3], je bil uveden seznam tretjih držav ali delov tretjih držav v primeru regionalizacije, iz katerih države članice dovolijo uvoz kopitarjev in semena, jajčnih celic in zarodkov vrste kopitarji, v njej pa so navedeni tudi drugi pogoji za takšen uvoz.
Glanders occurs in parts of the territory of Brazil and therefore imports of equidae, and, as a consequence, of their semen, ova and embryos, are only authorised from the disease-free parts of the territory of that third country listed in column 4 of Annex I to Decision 2004/211/EC.
Ker se smrkavost pojavlja na nekaterih območjih Brazilije, je uvoz kopitarjev ter posledično njihovega semena, jajčnih celic in zarodkov dovoljen le s tistih območij navedene tretje države, ki so prosta bolezni in so navedena v stolpcu 4 Priloge I k Odločbi 2004/211/ES.
The State of Goiás is listed in that column.
Država Goiás je v navedenem stolpcu.
The Distrito Federal is a distinct administrative entity situated within the State of Goiás.
Distrito Federal je posebna upravna enota v državi Goiás.
From an epidemiological point of view it has been considered part of the State of Goiás and not been specifically mentioned in that column.
Z epidemiološkega vidika je ta predel veljal za del države Goiás in ni bil posebej omenjen v navedenem stolpcu.
In April 2010 Brazil notified the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) of the confirmation of a case of glanders in a horse in Distrito Federal.
Brazilija je aprila 2010 obvestila Svetovno organizacijo za zdravje živali (OIE), da je bil potrjen primer smrkavosti pri konju iz Distrito Federal.
Since Distrito Federal is no longer free from glanders, Annex I to Decision 2004/211/EC should be amended in order to indicate that the introduction into the Union of equidae and of semen, ova and embryos of animals of the equine species are no longer authorised from that region.
Ker Distrito Federal ni več prost smrkavosti, je treba spremeniti Prilogo I k Odločbi 2004/211/ES, da se navede, da vnos kopitarjev in semena, jajčnih celic in zarodkov vrste kopitarji v Unijo z navedenega območja ni več dovoljen.
In addition, the Commission has received a report about confirmed cases of glanders in Bahrain.
Komisija je poleg tega prejela poročilo o potrjenih primerih smrkavosti v Bahrajnu.
The introduction of registered horses and of semen thereof from Bahrain should therefore no longer be authorised.
Vnos registriranih konj in njihovega semena iz Bahrajna zato ne sme biti več dovoljen.
Decision 2004/211/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 2004/211/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
the entry for Bahrain is replaced by the following:
vnos za Bahrajn se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Political and Security Committee Decision EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU/1/2010
Sklep Političnega in varnostnega odbora EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU/1/2010
of 15 June 2010
z dne 15. junija 2010
concerning the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union mission in support of security sector reform in the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU)
o imenovanju vodje misije Evropske unije v podporo reforme varnostnega sektorja v Republiki Gvineji-Bissau (EU RVS GUINEA-BISSAU)
(2010/334/CFSP)
(2010/334/SZVP)
Having regard to Council Joint Action 2008/112/CFSP of 12 February 2008 on the European Union mission in support of security sector reform in the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU) [1], and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 8(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Skupnega ukrepa Sveta 2008/112/SZVP z dne 12. februarja 2008 o misiji Evropske unije v podporo reforme varnostnega sektorja v Republiki Gvineji-Bissau (EU RVS GUINEA-BISSAU) [1], zlasti drugega pododstavka člena 8(1) Skupnega ukrepa,
Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Joint Action 2008/112/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (hereinafter referred to as ‘PSC’), in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of the EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU mission, including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.
Na podlagi člena 8(1) Skupnega ukrepa 2008/112/SZVP je Svet v skladu s členom 38 Pogodbe pooblastil Politični in varnostni odbor (PVO), da sprejeme ustrezne odločitve glede političnega nadzora in strateškega vodenja misije EU RVS GUINEA-BISSAU, vključno z odločitvijo, da se imenuje vodja misije.
On 5 March 2008, upon a proposal by the Secretary General of the Council, High Representative for the common foreign and security policy, the PSC appointed by Decision EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU/1/2008 [2] Mr Juan Esteban VERASTEGUI as Head of Mission of the European Union mission EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU.
PVO je 5. marca 2008 na predlog generalnega sekretarja Sveta/visokega predstavnika za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko s Sklepom EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU/1/2008 [2] za vodjo misije Evropske unije EU RVS GUINEA-BISSAU imenoval g. Juana Estebana VERASTEGUIJA.
The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has proposed that Mr Fernando AFONSO be appointed to replace Mr Juan Esteban VERASTEGUI as Head of Mission of the European Union mission EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU from 1 July 2010,
Visoka predstavnica Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko je predlagala, da se za vodjo misije Evropske unije EU RVS GUINEA-BISSAU imenuje g. Fernando AFONSO, ki bo na tem mestu s 1. julijem 2010 zamenjal g. Juana Estebana VERASTEGUIJA –