natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the letter of 2 July 2004, the Italian authorities also asked whether, in the case in point, as regards the rescue and restructuring of firms in difficulty, it would be possible for the aid paid between 1998 and 2000 [11] for loans in place as at 5 December 1994 to be covered by point 2.5 of the 1997 Guidelines, according to which ‘the guidelines are also without prejudice to the application of aid schemes authorized for other purposes than rescues or restructuring, such as regional development the development of SMEs’, given that the measures provided for by Law No 52/94 had been approved as measures intended to facilitate the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic areas, without adversely affecting trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest.
V dopisu z dne 2. julija 2004 so italijanski organi tudi vprašali, ali bi bilo glede reševanja in prestrukturiranja podjetij v težavah v tem primeru možno, da se za pomoč, dodeljeno med letoma 1998 in 2000 [11], namenjeno za posojila, ki so obstajala 5. decembra 1994, uporablja točka 2.5 smernic iz leta 1997, v skladu s katero „smernice ne posegajo v izvajanje shem pomoči, odobrenih za druge namene, kot sta reševanje in prestrukturiranje, na primer za regionalni razvoj [in] razvoj MSP“, glede na to, da so bili ukrepi, predvideni z zakonom št. 52/94, odobreni kot ukrepi za pomoč pri razvoju določenih dejavnosti ali gospodarskih področij, kadar takšna pomoč ne spreminja trgovine v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
Finally, in reply to point 29 of the letter of 11 December 2003 (see footnote 1), in which the Commission asked the Italian authorities to send it a series of Decisions of Lazio Regional Authority and extracts of all the Finance Laws adopted with effect from 1 January 1998, so as to enable it to establish the exact value of the allocations earmarked each year to fund the scheme in question, the Italian authorities explained that:
Nazadnje so italijanski organi v odgovoru na točko 29 dopisa z dne 11. decembra 2003 (glej opombo 1), v katerem je Komisija prosila italijanske organe, naj pošljejo serijo regionalnih odločb ter izvlečke vseh finančnih zakonov, sprejetih po 1. januarju 1998, na podlagi katerih bi Komisija lahko ugotovila točen znesek nakazil za vsako leto za financiranje zadevne sheme pomoči, pojasnili:
the only funding laid down for Law No 52/94 was that provided for in the law itself and reproduced in the 1995 regional budget [12];
edino plačilo, predvideno v zakonu št. 52/94, je bilo plačilo, predvideno v samem zakonu in vključeno v deželni proračun leta 1995 [12];
the expenditure commitments became effective only in 1996, after the law had been approved by the Commission;
obveznosti glede izdatkov so začele veljati šele leta 1996, tj. po odobritvi zakona s strani Komisije;
subsequently, the aid to undertakings that satisfied the conditions of Law No 52/94 were financed through funds that had been freed up thanks to savings resulting from the reduction in interest rates and the rigorous implementation of the law, without there being any need to have recourse to supplementary budgetary appropriations;
posledično so bile pomoči za podjetja, ki so izpolnjevala pogoje iz zakona št. 52/94, financirane iz skladov, sproščenih zaradi prihrankov, nastalih z znižanjem obrestnih mer in strogim izvajanjem zakona, pri čemer niso bila potrebna dodatna proračunska sredstva;
the aid from Lazio Region to agricultural holdings concerned only bank loans that were linked to the making of investments and were in place as at 5 December 1994, bearing in mind that, in 1994, as in previous years, Italy had one of the highest interest rates among the Member States of the Union.
pomoč dežele Lazio za kmetijska podjetja je zadevala le bančna posojila, ki so bila povezana z izvajanjem naložb in so obstajala 5. decembra 1994, z upoštevanjem, da je imela Italija leta 1994, tako kot v letih pred tem, eno od najvišjih obrestnih mer v primerjavi z drugimi državami članicami Unije.
In the letter sent to the Commission on 3 April 2009, the Italian authorities clarified that all the aid applications under the scheme had been submitted prior to 1 January 1998.
V dopisu, poslanem Komisiji 3. aprila 2009, so italijanski organi pojasnili, da so bile vse prošnje za pomoč v okviru sheme predložene pred 1. januarjem 1998.
According to Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty, any aid granted by a Member State or through State resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods is, in so far as it affects trade between Member States, incompatible with the common market.
V skladu s členom 87(1) Pogodbe ES je, če vpliva na trgovino med državami članicami, s skupnim trgom nezdružljiva tista pomoč, ki jo v kakršni koli obliki odobrijo države ali se izplačuje iz državnih virov in ki zaradi dajanja prednosti nekaterim podjetjem ali proizvajalcem izkrivlja konkurenco ali pomeni tveganje za njeno izkrivljanje.
The measure in question meets this definition, insofar as it favours certain undertakings (those with onerous debts in the agricultural sector) and can affect trade, given Italy’s position in the agricultural production sector (by way of example, in 2006 Italy was the third-largest beef and veal producer and the largest tomato producer in the Union).
Zadevni ukrep je v skladu s to opredelitvijo, saj daje prednost določenim podjetjem (tistim z velikimi dolgovi v kmetijskem sektorju), kar lahko vpliva na trgovino med državami članicami glede na položaj Italije v sektorju kmetijske proizvodnje (na primer: leta 2006 je bila Italija tretja največja proizvajalka govedine in največja proizvajalka paradižnika v Uniji).
However, in the cases provided for in Article 87(2) and (3) of the EC Treaty, such measures may, by derogation, be considered compatible with the common market.
V primerih, predvidenih v členu 87(2) in (3) Pogodbe ES, so lahko nekateri ukrepi izjemoma združljivi s skupnim trgom.
In the present case, given the type of scheme in question, the only derogation that may be invoked is that laid down in Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty, according to which aid may be considered compatible with the common market if it is intended to facilitate the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic areas, provided that it does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest.
V tem primeru se lahko glede na vrsto zadevne sheme sklicuje le na odstopanje iz člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES, ki določa, da je pomoč v skladu s skupnim trgom, če je namenjena za razvoj določenih gospodarskih dejavnosti ali določenih gospodarskih območij, kadar takšna pomoč ne spreminja trgovine med državami članicami v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
Before examining the applicability of that derogation, the Commission would point out that, in their letter of 2 July 2004 following initiation of the procedure under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty, the Italian authorities stated that the procedure to repeal Article 257 of Law No 10/01 had been launched and that no aid had been paid out pursuant to that article.
Pred proučitvijo veljavnosti navedenega odstopanja Komisija poudarja, da so italijanski organi v dopisu z dne 2. julija 2004, prejetem po začetku postopka iz odstavka 88(2) Pogodbe ES, sporočili, da so sprožili postopek za razveljavitev člena 257 deželnega zakona št. 10/01 in da ni bila dodeljena nobena pomoč v skladu s tem členom.
By telex dated 20 September 2005, the Commission asked the Italian authorities to supply proof that Article 257 of Law No 10/01 had been repealed.
Po teleksu z dne 20. septembra 2005 so službe Komisije zaprosile italijanske organe, naj predložijo dokazilo o razveljavitvi člena 257 zakona št. 10/01.
The Commission received a reply to that telex by letter dated 16 July 2008 confirming the repeal, by means of Article 27(2) of Regional Law No 4 of 28 April 2006, of the disputed provisions contained in Article 257 of Law No 10/01, the application of which had in any case been on hold since the procedure under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty had been initiated.
Službe Komisije so prejele odgovor na navedeni teleks v dopisu z dne 16. julija 2008, ki v skladu z odstavkom 2 zakona št. 4 z dne 28. aprila 2006 potrjuje razveljavitev člena 257 zakona št. 10/01, katerega izvajanje je bilo ustavljeno s sprožitvijo postopka iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe ES.
Moreover, the Italian authorities announced the withdrawal of the notification of the aforementioned Article 257 in their letter of 2 July 2004.
Poleg tega so italijanski organi z dopisom z dne 2. julija 2004 obvestili Komisijo o preklicu priglasitve navedenega člena 257
In view of the foregoing, the Commission has no reason to continue its investigations into the provisions of Article 257 of Law No 10/01 and can close its examination procedure.
Z upoštevanjem teh dejstev Komisija nima razloga za nadaljevanje preiskave določb člena 257 zakona št. 10/01 in lahko zaključi postopek preiskave.
As regards the applicability of the derogation under Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty in relation to the aid granted between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2000 (see footnote 11), the Commission notes that, in the comments made after the procedure under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty was initiated and during the subsequent meeting, the Italian authorities clarified that the aid in question was funded exclusively from the sums entered in the budget for scheme C 43/95, which was approved by the Commission (see recital 24).
Kar zadeva veljavnost odstopanja iz člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES v zvezi s pomočmi, dodeljenimi med 1. januarjem 1998 in 31. decembrom 2000 (glej opombo 11), službe Komisije poudarjajo, da so italijanski organi v mnenjih, ki so jih predstavili po sprožitvi postopka iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe ES in med sledečimi srečanji, pojasnili, da je bila zadevna pomoč dodeljena samo iz proračunskih zneskov za shemo C 43/95, ki jo je odobrila Komisija (glej uvodno izjavo 24).
It is also inferred from the letter of 3 April 2009 from the Italian authorities that all the aid applications were submitted prior to 1 January 1998 (see recital 25).
Iz dopisa italijanskih organov z dne 3. aprila 2009 se tudi sklepa, da so bili vsi zahtevki za pomoč predloženi pred 1. januarjem 1998 (glej uvodno izjavo 25).
Since these clarifications demonstrate that the sums used between 1998 and 2000 were already covered by a Commission decision and that no applications were submitted subsequent to the date after which any new application had to be in line with the new provisions on aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (see recital 17), the Commission no longer has any reason to take a new decision, in the light of these provisions, on the applicability of the derogation under Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty to the aid granted between 1998 and 2000, which, in practice, is the continuation of the funding resulting from aid applications submitted prior to 1 January 1998 that complied with the conditions referred to in recital 15, and that were already approved by the Commission (see recital 14).
Iz navedenih pojasnitev izhaja, da je o zneskih, izplačanih v obdobju 1998–2000, Komisija že sprejela odločitev in da po datumu, po katerem bi morala biti vsaka nova vloga v skladu z novimi določbami o pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah (glej uvodno izjavo 17), ni bila predložena nobena vloga, zato Komisija, z ozirom na navedene določbe, nima več razloga za sprejetje nove odločitve o veljavnosti izvzetja iz člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES za pomoči, dodeljene v obdobju 1998–2000, ki je dejansko nadaljevanje financiranja, izhajajoče iz zahtev za pomoč pred 1. januarjem 1998, ki so v skladu s pogoji iz uvodne izjave 15 in jih je Komisija že odobrila (glej uvodno izjavo 14).
The procedure initiated in relation to the aid granted between 1998 and 2000 may thus also be closed,
Postopek, sprožen v zvezi s pomočjo, dodeljeno med letoma 1998 in 2000, se torej lahko zaključi –
The procedure under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty that was launched by letter dated 11 December 2003 [13] in relation to the abovementioned scheme is hereby closed owing to having become redundant, since Italy withdrew the notification on 2 July 2004 and has not pursued the proposed aid.
Postopek iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe ES, sprožen z dopisom z dne 11. decembra 2003 [13] v zvezi z zgoraj navedeno shemo, se zaključi, ker je postal brezpredmeten, potem ko je Italija 2. julija 2004 umaknila priglasitev in ni nadaljevala s projektom pomoči.
The procedure under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty that was launched in relation to the aid granted by Italy (Lazio Region) between 1998 and 2000 under the scheme based on the provisions of Law No 52/94, as amended by Law No 13/96, and which has become redundant, is hereby closed.
Postopek iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe ES, sprožen v zvezi s pomočmi, ki jih je Italija (dežela Lazio) dodelila v obdobju 1998–2000 v okviru sheme, ki temelji na določbah zakona št. 52/94, kot je bil spremenjen z zakonom št. 13/96, in ki je postal brezpredmeten, se zaključi.
Letter SG (2003) D/233340.
Dopis SG (2003) D/233340.
OJ C 15, 21.1.2004, p. 28.
UL C 15, 21.1.2004, str. 28.
Case No C 43/95 (ex NN 73/94) (OJ C 327, 7.12.1995, p. 9).
Dosje C 43/95 (ex NN 73/94) - UL C 327, 7.12.1995, str. 9.
OJ L 128, 19.5.1975, p. 1.
UL l 128, 19.5.1975, str. 1.
OJ L 91, 6.4.1990, p. 1.
UL L 91, 6.4.1990, str. 1.
OJ L 163, 29.6.1990, p. 71.
UL L 163, 29.6.1990, str. 71.
OJ L 222, 20.9.1995, p. 19.
UL L 222, 20.9.1995, str. 19.
Letter SG (96) D/3465 of 29 March 1996.
Dopis SG (96) D/3465 z dne 29. marca 1996.
OJ C 283, 19.9.1997, p. 2.
UL C 283, 19.9.1997, str. 2.
The Italian authorities referred to 2000 and not to 2001 since no aid was granted after 2000.
Italijanski organi se sklicujejo na leto 2000 in ne na leto 2001, saj po letu 2000 ni bila dodeljena nobena pomoč.
This figure was ITL 4000000000 (EUR 2061856).
4000000000 ITL (2061856 EUR).
Between 1998 and 2000 the total value of the aid granted was ITL 1400000000 (EUR 721650).
V obdobju 1998–2000 je bil skupni znesek pomoči 400000000 ITL (721650 EUR).
It also modifies Article 2 of Law No 52/94 by extending the possibility of receiving the aid provided for by that law to onerous debts existing as at 31 December 2000.
Spreminja tudi člen 2 zakona št. 52/94, in sicer z razširitvijo možnosti za pridobitev pomoči, predvidenih v tem zakonu, za velike dolgove, obstoječe 31. decembra 2000.
Lastly, it includes a clause under which the aid provided for can be implemented only after publication, in the Bollettino ufficiale della Regione Lazio [Official Bulletin of Lazio Region] of the positive outcome of the examination carried out by the Commission pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty.
Poleg tega vsebuje določbo, s skladu s katero se predvidene pomoči dodelijo šele po objavi pozitivnih zaključkov preverjanja, ki ga opravi Komisije v skladu s členoma 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES, v Bollettino ufficiale della Regione Lazio (Uradni list dežele Lazio).
on the paying-up of the increase of the European Central Bank’s capital by the national central banks of Member States whose currency is the euro
o vplačilu povečanja kapitala Evropske centralne banke s strani nacionalnih centralnih bank držav članic, katerih valuta je euro
Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank (hereinafter the ‘Statute of the ESCB’), and in particular Article 28.3 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Statuta Evropskega sistema centralnih bank in Evropske centralne banke (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Statut ESCB) ter zlasti člena 28.3 Statuta ESCB,
Decision ECB/2008/24 of 12 December 2008 laying down the measures necessary for the paying-up of the European Central Bank’s capital by the participating national central banks [1] determined how and to what extent the national central banks (NCBs) of the Member States whose currency is the euro were under an obligation to pay up the capital of the European Central Bank (ECB) on 1 January 2009.
Sklep ECB/2008/24 z dne 12. decembra 2008 o določitvi ukrepov, potrebnih za vplačilo kapitala Evropske centralne banke s strani sodelujočih nacionalnih centralnih bank [1], je določil način in višino, v katerih so bile nacionalne centralne banke (NCB) držav članic, katerih valuta je euro, obvezane vplačati kapital Evropske centralne banke (ECB) na 1. januar 2009.
Pursuant to Article 1 of Decision ECB/2010/26 of 13 December 2010 on the increase of the European Central Bank’s capital [2] the ECB’s capital has been increased by EUR 5000 million from EUR 5760652402,58 to EUR 10760652402,58 with effect from 29 December 2010.
V skladu s členom 1 Sklepa ECB/2010/26 z dne 13. decembra 2010 o povečanju kapitala Evropske centralne banke [2] se je kapital ECB povečal za 5000 milijonov EUR, in sicer s 5760652402,58 EUR na 10760652402,58 EUR, z učinkom od 29. decembra 2010.
Decision ECB/2008/23 of 12 December 2008 on the national central banks’ percentage shares in the key for subscription to the European Central Bank’s capital [3] lays down the key for subscription to the ECB’s capital in accordance with Article 29.3 of the Statute of the ESCB and establishes with effect from 1 January 2009 the weightings assigned to each NCB in the capital key (hereinafter the ‘capital key weightings’).
Sklep ECB/2008/23 z dne 12. decembra 2008 o odstotnih deležih nacionalnih centralnih bank v ključu za vpis kapitala Evropske centralne banke [3] določa ključ za vpis kapitala ECB v skladu s členom 29.3 Statuta ESCB in z učinkom od 1. januarja 2009 vzpostavlja ponderje, določene za vsako NCB v kapitalskem ključu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ponderji v kapitalskem ključu).
Pursuant to Article 28.3 of the Statute of the ESCB the Governing Council, acting by the qualified majority provided for in Article 10.3 of the Statute of the ESCB, has the competence to determine the extent to which and the form in which the capital is to be paid up.
V skladu s členom 28.3 Statuta ESCB Svet ECB s kvalificirano večino iz člena 10.3 Statuta ESCB določi, koliko kapitala in v kakšni obliki se vplača.
Pursuant to Article 1 of Council Decision 2010/416/EU of 13 July 2010 in accordance with Article 140(2) of the Treaty on the adoption by Estonia of the euro on 1 January 2011 [4], Estonia fulfils the necessary conditions for adoption of the euro and the derogation granted to it pursuant to Article 4 of the 2003 Act of Accession [5] will be abrogated with effect from 1 January 2011.
Po členu 1 Sklepa Sveta 2010/416/EU z dne 13. julija 2010 v skladu s členom 140(2) Pogodbe o uvedbi eura v Estoniji 1. januarja 2011 [4] Estonija izpolnjuje izpolnjuje potrebne pogoje za uvedbo eura, odstopanje v njeno korist v skladu s členom 4 Akta o pristopu iz leta 2003 [5] pa bo razveljavljeno s 1. januarjem 2011.
In accordance with Decision ECB/2010/34 of 31 December 2010 on the paying-up of capital, transfer of foreign reserve assets and contributions by Eesti Pank to the European Central Bank’s reserves and provisions [6] Eesti Pank is under an obligation to pay up the remaining share of its subscription to the ECB’s capital with effect from 1 January 2011, taking into account the increase of the ECB’s capital with effect from 29 December 2010 and the form in which the capital is to be paid up,
V skladu s Sklepom ECB/2010/34 z dne 31. decembra 2010 o vplačilu kapitala, prenosu deviznih rezerv in prispevkih v rezerve in rezervacije Evropske centralne banke s strani centralne banke Eesti Pank [6] je Eesti Pank obvezana vplačati preostali delež svojega vpisanega kapitala v kapital ECB z učinkom od 1. januarja 2011, ob upoštevanju povečanja kapitala ECB z učinkom od 29. decembra 2010 in oblike, v kateri ga je treba vplačati –
Extent and form of subscribed and paid-up capital
Višina in oblika vpisanega in vplačanega kapitala
Each NCB shall pay up the additional amount shown next to its name in the following table:
Vsaka NCB vplača dodatni znesek, ki je prikazan poleg njenega imena v spodnji tabeli:
NCBs shall pay to the ECB the amounts specified in paragraph 2 by means of a separate transfer via the Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross settlement Express Transfer system (TARGET2).
NCB plačajo Evropski centralni banki zneske, navedene v odstavku 2, z ločenim prenosom preko transevropskega sistema bruto poravnave v realnem času (sistem TARGET2).
Each NCB shall pay up its increased capital share in three equal annual instalments.
Vsaka NCB vplača svoj povečani kapitalski delež v treh enakih letnih obrokih.
The first instalment shall be paid on 29 December 2010, and the following instalments shall be paid 2 business days before the last TARGET2 operating day of the following 2 years.
Prvi obrok je treba plačati 29. decembra 2010, nadaljnja obroka pa je treba plačati dva delovna dneva pred zadnjim delovnim dnem sistema TARGET2 v naslednjih dveh letih.
OJ L 21, 24.1.2009, p. 69.
UL L 21, 24.1.2009, str. 69.
OJ L 21, 24.1.2009, p. 66.
UL L 21, 24.1.2009, str. 66.
Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded (OJ L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 33).
Akt o pogojih pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Cipra, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike in prilagoditvah Pogodb, na katerih temelji Evropska unija (UL L 236, 23.9.2003, str. 33).
Taking into account the capital key weightings set out in Article 2 of Decision ECB/2008/23 and the increase of the ECB’s capital in accordance with Article 1 of Decision ECB/2010/26, each NCB shall have a total subscribed capital of the amount shown next to its name in the following table:
Ob upoštevanju ponderjev v kapitalskem ključu, določenih v členu 2 Sklepa ECB/2008/23, in povečanja kapitala ECB v skladu s členom 1 Sklepa ECB/2010/26 ima vsaka NCB skupni vpisani kapital v znesku, ki je prikazan poleg njenega imena v spodnji tabeli:
amending the list of herbal substances, preparations and combinations thereof for use in traditional herbal medicinal products
o spremembi seznama rastlinskih snovi, pripravkov in njihovih kombinacij za uporabo v tradicionalnih zdravilih rastlinskega izvora
(notified under document C(2009) 5804)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 5804)
Having regard to the opinions of the European Medicines Agency, formulated on 10 January 2008 and 6 March 2008 by the Committee for Herbal Medicinal Products,
ob upoštevanju mnenj Evropske agencije za zdravila, ki jih je 10. januarja 2008 in 6. marca 2008 oblikoval Odbor za zdravila rastlinskega izvora,
Calendula officinalis L and Pimpinella anisum L comply with the requirements set out in Directive 2001/83/EC.
Calendula officinalis L. in Pimpinella anisum L. izpolnjujeta zahteve iz Direktive 2001/83/ES.
Calendula officinalis L and Pimpinella anisum L can be considered as herbal substances, herbal preparations or combinations thereof.
Calendula officinalis L. in Pimpinella anisum L. se lahko štejeta za rastlinski snovi, pripravka ali njuni kombinaciji.
It is therefore appropriate to include Calendula officinalis L and Pimpinella anisum L in the list of herbal substances, preparations and combinations thereof for use in traditional herbal medicinal products established in Annex I to Commission Decision 2008/911/EC [2].
Zato je primerno, da se Calendula officinalis L. in Pimpinella anisum L. vključita v seznam rastlinskih snovi, pripravkov in njihovih kombinacij za uporabo v tradicionalnih zdravilih rastlinskega izvora, določenim v Prilogi I k Odločbi Komisije 2008/911/ES [2].
Decision 2008/911/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 2008/911/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Decision 2008/911/EC is amended as follows:
Odločba 2008/911/ES se spremeni:
Annex I is amended in accordance with Annex I to this Decision.
Priloga I se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo I k tej odločbi.