natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Any changes of names and flags and additional information on the vessels are available on the NEAFC website: www.neafc.org’.
Kakršne koli spremembe imen in zastav ter dodatne informacije o plovilih so na voljo na spletni strani NEAFC: www.neafc.org“.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1129/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1129/2008
imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain pre- and post-stressing wires and wire strands of non-alloy steel (PSC wires and strands) originating in the People’s Republic of China
o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih vrst žic in pletenih žičnih vrvi iz nelegiranega jekla za pred- in ponapenjanje (žice in pletene žične vrvi PSC) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
On 3 January 2008, the Commission received a complaint concerning imports of certain pre- and post-stressing wires and wire strands of non-alloy steel (PSC wires and strands) originating in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) lodged pursuant to Article 5 of the basic Regulation by Eurostress Information Service (ESIS) (the complainant) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 57 %, of the total Community production of PSC wires and strands.
Komisija je 3. januarja 2008 prejela pritožbo v zvezi z uvozom nekaterih vrst žic in pletenih žičnih vrvi iz nelegiranega jekla za pred- in ponapenjanje (žice in pletene žične vrvi PSC) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (LRK), ki jo je v skladu s členom 5 osnovne uredbe vložil Eurostress Information Service (ESIS) (pritožnik) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo večji delež, v tem primeru več kot 57 %, celotne proizvodnje žic in pletenih žičnih vrvi PSC Skupnosti.
The complaint contained prima facie evidence of dumping and of material injury caused by such dumping which was considered sufficient to justify the opening of a proceeding.
Ta pritožba je vsebovala prima facie dokaze o dampingu in znatni škodi, ki jo je povzročil, kar se je štelo za zadostno za upravičenost začetka postopka.
On 16 February 2008, a proceeding was initiated by the publication of a notice of initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] (the ‘notice of initiation’).
Postopek se je začel 16. februarja 2008 z objavo obvestila o začetku v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] („obvestilo o začetku“).
The Commission officially advised the exporting producers in the PRC, importers, traders, users and associations known to be concerned, the authorities of the PRC, the complainant Community producers and other Community producers known to be concerned of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je o začetku postopka uradno obvestila proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK, uvoznike, trgovce, uporabnike in združenja, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, organe LRK, proizvajalce Skupnosti pritožnike in druge proizvajalce Skupnosti, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva.
All interested parties who so requested and showed that there were particular reasons why they should be heard were granted a hearing.
Vsem zainteresiranim strankam, ki so zahtevale zaslišanje in dokazale, da zanj obstajajo posebni razlogi, je bilo to odobreno.
In order to allow exporting producers to submit a claim for market economy treatment (MET) or individual treatment (IT), if they so wished, the Commission sent claim forms to the Chinese exporting producers known to be concerned and to the authorities of the PRC.
Da bi proizvajalci izvozniki lahko predložili zahtevek za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo (TGO) ali individualno obravnavo (IO), če tako želijo, je Komisija kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in organom LRK poslala obrazce za zahtevek.
Eight exporting producers, including groups of related companies, requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, or IT should the investigation establish that they do not meet the conditions for MET.
Osem proizvajalcev izvoznikov, vključno s skupinami povezanih družb, je vložilo zahtevek za TGO v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe ali IO, če bi preiskava pokazala, da ne izpolnjujejo pogojev za TGO.
In view of the apparent high number of exporting producers in the PRC, importers and producers in the Community, the Commission indicated in the notice of initiation that sampling methods might be applied for the determination of dumping and injury, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je glede na očitno veliko število proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK ter uvoznikov in proizvajalcev v Skupnosti v obvestilu o začetku navedla, da bo morda za ugotovitev dampinga in škode v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe uporabila metode vzorčenja.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, all exporting producers in the PRC, Community importers and Community producers were asked to make themselves known to the Commission and to provide, as specified in the notice of initiation, basic information on their activities related to the product concerned during the investigation period (1 January 2007 to 31 December 2007).
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in če bi bilo, izbrala vzorec, so bili vsi proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK ter uvozniki in proizvajalci v Skupnosti zaprošeni, naj se javijo Komisiji in predložijo, kakor je določeno v obvestilu o začetku, osnovne informacije o svojih dejavnostih, povezanih z zadevnim izdelkom v obdobju preiskave (od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2007).
Given the limited number of responses to the sampling exercise, it was decided that sampling was not necessary for Chinese exporting producers nor importers within the Community.
Glede na omejeno število odgovorov na vzorčenje je bilo odločeno, da vzorčenje za kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike in uvoznike v Skupnosti ni potrebno.
With regard to the Community producers, given the number of responses received to the sampling exercise, the Commission decided to select a sample in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na število prejetih odgovorov na vzorčenje se je Komisija v zvezi s proizvajalci Skupnosti odločila izbrati vzorec v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
This sample of seven companies located in seven Member States was based on the largest representative volume of production and sales of the Community industry which could be reasonably investigated within the time available.
Ta vzorec sedmih družb iz sedmih držav članic je temeljil na največjem reprezentativnem obsegu proizvodnje in prodaje industrije Skupnosti, ki bi ga lahko razumno preiskali v razpoložljivem času.
Questionnaires were sent to all companies in the PRC and all users and importers in the Community who responded to the sampling exercise, and those Community producers selected for sampling and to all other parties known to be concerned.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani vsem družbam v LRK, vsem uporabnikom in uvoznikom v Skupnosti, ki so se odzvali na vzorčenje, tistim proizvajalcem Skupnosti, ki so bili izbrani za vzorčenje, ter vsem drugim strankam, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva.
Replies were received from seven exporting producers and groups of exporting producers in the PRC, from all sampled producers in the Community, four importers and seven users.
Komisija je prejela odgovore od sedmih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK, vseh vzorčenih proizvajalcev v Skupnosti, štirih uvoznikov in sedmih uporabnikov.
Carrington Wire Limited (Carrington), Elland, UK
Carrington Wire Limited (Carrington), Elland, Združeno kraljestvo
DWK Drahtwerk Koln GmbH, (DWK), Köln, Germany
DWK Drahtwerk Köln GmbH, (DWK), Köln, Nemčija
Fapricela — Indústria de Trefilaria, SA (Fapricela), Anca, Portugal
Fapricela – Indústria de Trefilaria, SA (Fapricela), Anca, Portugalska
Italcables, Spa (Italcables) Brescia, Italy
Italcables, Spa (Italcables) Brescia, Italija
Nedri Spanstaal, BV (Nedri), Venlo, Netherlands
Nedri Spanstaal, BV (Nedri), Venlo, Nizozemska
(Tycsa), Santander, Spain
(Tycsa), Santander, Španija
Voestalpine Austria Draht, GMBH (Voestalpine), Brück, Austria
Voestalpine Austria Draht, GMBH (Voestalpine), Brück, Avstrija
Kiswire Qingdao, Ltd, Qingdao
Kiswire Qingdao, Ltd, Čingdao
Liaoning Tongda Building Material Industry Co., Ltd, Liaoyang
Liaoning Tongda Building Material Industry Co., Ltd, Liaojang
Ossen MaanShan Steel Wire and Co. Ltd, Maanshan, and Ossen Jiujiang Steel Wire Cable Co. Ltd, Jiujiang
Ossen MaanShan Steel Wire and Co. Ltd, Maanshan, in Ossen Jiujiang Steel Wire Cable Co. Ltd, Džiudžiang
Silvery Dragon PC Steel Products Group Co., Ltd, Tianjin
Silvery Dragon PC Steel Products Group Co., Ltd, Tiandžin
Tianjin Shengte Prestressed Concretes Steel Strand Co., Ltd, Tianjin
Tianjin Shengte Prestressed Concretes Steel Strand Co., Ltd, Tiandžin
Wuxi Jinyang Metal Products Co., Ltd, Jangyian
Wuxi Jinyang Metal Products Co., Ltd, Džangjian
Importers in the Community
Uvozniki v Skupnosti
Ibercordones Pretensados SL, Madrid, Spain
Ibercordones Pretensados SL, Madrid, Španija
Megasteel LLP (Megasteel), Malmesbury, UK
Megasteel LLP (Megasteel), Malmesbury, Združeno kraljestvo
Tarmac Ltd (Tarmac), Wolverhampton, UK
Tarmac Ltd (Tarmac), Wolverhampton, Združeno kraljestvo
Vanguard Hormigon (Vanguard), Madrid, Spain.
Vanguard Hormigon (Vanguard), Madrid, Španija
In view of the need to establish a normal value for exporting producers in the PRC to which MET might not be granted, a verification to establish normal value on the basis of data from an analogue country, Turkey in this case, took place at the premises of the following company:
Zaradi potrebe po določitvi normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK, katerim TGO morda ne bo odobrena, je bil v prostorih naslednje družbe izveden preveritveni obisk z namenom določitve normalne vrednosti na podlagi podatkov iz analogne države, v tem primeru Turčije:
Çelik Halat ve Tel Sanayii A.Ș., Izmit, Turkey.
Çelik Halat ve Tel Sanayii A.Ș., Izmit, Turčija.
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2007 (‘investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2007 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2004 to the end of the investigation period (period considered).
Preučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2004 do konca obdobja preiskave (obravnavano obdobje).
The product concerned is certain wire of non-alloy steel (not plated or not coated or plated or coated with zinc) and stranded wire of non-alloy steel (whether or not plated or coated), containing by weight 0,6 % or more of carbon, with a maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeding 3 mm, originating in the People’s Republic of China (the product concerned), normally declared within CN codes ex72171090, ex72172090, ex73121061, ex73121065 and ex73121069.
Zadevni izdelek so nekatere vrste žic iz nelegiranega jekla (neplatirane ali neprevlečene ali platirane ali prevlečene s cinkom) in pletene žične vrvi iz nelegiranega jekla (platirane ali prevlečene ali ne), ki vsebujejo 0,6 mas. % ali več ogljika, z največjo dimenzijo prečnega prereza 3 mm ali več, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (zadevni izdelek), navadno uvrščene pod oznake KN ex72171090, ex72172090, ex73121061, ex73121065 in ex73121069.
The products are commercially known as pre- or post-stressing wires and wire strands (PSC wires and strands).
Izdelki so na tržišču znani kot žice ali žične vrvi za pred- in ponapenjanje (žice in pletene žične vrvi PSC).
The most common applications for PSC wires and strands are for concrete reinforcement, for suspension elements and for stay-cable bridges.
Žice in pletene žične vrvi PSC se najpogosteje uporabljajo za armirani beton, vzmetne elemente in napete mostove (s poševnimi visečimi vrvmi).
The product is made by drawing of wire of high carbon steel.
Izdelek se proizvaja z vlečenjem vrvi iz jekla z visoko vsebnostjo ogljika.
The Community wire rope importers association requested that the product scope be reduced by excluding plated or coated strands, strands of more than seven wires, and strands of a diameter below 6,8 mm and above 15,7 mm on the grounds that the complainants would not suffer any material injury due to imports of these types of products since the market share represented by these types of products as a whole does not exceed 3 % of the total production in the Community.
Združenje uvoznikov žične vrvi v Skupnosti je zahtevalo zmanjšanje obsega izdelka, tako da bi izključili platirane ali prevlečene pletene žične vrvi, pletene žične vrvi z več kot sedmimi žicami in pletene žične vrvi s premerom, manjšim od 6,8 mm in večjim od 15,7 mm, z utemeljitvijo, da pritožniki ne bi utrpeli nobene znatne škode zaradi uvoza teh vrst izdelkov, saj celotni tržni delež, ki ga imajo te vrste izdelkov, ne presega 3 % celotne proizvodnje v Skupnosti.
However, those product types cannot be excluded merely on the grounds that they represent a small share of the production.
Vendar pa teh vrst izdelkov ni mogoče izključiti zgolj z utemeljitvijo, da pomenijo majhen delež proizvodnje.
The investigation found that these and other types of the product concerned all share the same basic physical and technical characteristics and are basically used for the same purposes.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo te in druge vrste zadevnega izdelka enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter da se v osnovi uporabljajo v enake namene.
Furthermore, depending on the producing company, the share in production of the types mentioned above can be substantially higher.
Poleg tega je, delež v proizvodnji zgoraj navedenih vrst lahko precej višji, odvisno od družbe proizvajalke.
It is therefore provisionally concluded that all types of PSC wires and strands as described in the notice of initiation constitute a single product for the purpose of this investigation.
Zato se začasno sklene, da za namen te preiskave vse vrste žic in pletenih žičnih vrvi PSC, kakor so opisane v obvestilu o začetku, za namen te preiskave pomenijo en sam izdelek.
The investigation showed that the basic physical and technical characteristics of the PSC wires and strands produced and sold by the Community industry in the Community, PSC wires and strands produced and sold on the domestic market in Turkey, which served as an analogue country, and PSC wires and strands produced in the PRC and sold to the Community have essentially the same basic physical and technical characteristics and the same basic use.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti žic in pletenih žičnih vrvi PSC, ki jih v Skupnosti proizvaja in prodaja industrija Skupnosti, žic in pletenih žičnih vrvi PSC, proizvedenih in prodajanih na domačem trgu v Turčiji, ki je bila uporabljena kot primerljiva država, ter žic in pletenih žičnih vrvi PSC, ki se proizvajajo v LRK in prodajajo v Skupnost, v bistvu enake in da je enaka tudi njihova osnovna uporaba.
One Community importer claimed that it is currently importing an innovative product type (Spiral Ribbed Wire) which is not produced in the Community.
Eden od uvoznikov Skupnosti je trdil, da trenutno uvaža inovativno vrsto izdelka (spiralno rebrasto žico), ki se v Skupnosti ne proizvaja.
This claim was investigated and it was found that:
Ta trditev je bila proučena in ugotovljeno je bilo, da:
the imported product type and the Community produced PSC wires and strands both serve the same or similar end-uses.
so uvoženo vrsto izdelka ter žice in pletene žične vrvi PSC, proizvedene v Skupnosti, uporabljali isti ali podobni končni uporabniki.
All the aforementioned PSC wires and strands are therefore considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Vse zgoraj navedene žice in pletene žične vrvi PSC se torej štejejo za podobne v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
In the case of two exporting producers it was found that false and misleading information was provided in their Market Economy Treatment (MET) claims and during the inspection at their premises.
V primeru dveh proizvajalcev izvoznikov je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile v njunih zahtevkih za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo (TGO) in med preiskavo v njunih prostorih dane napačne in zavajajoče informacije.
One other exporting producer failed to reply to the anti-dumping questionnaire after the MET verification visit at the premises of the company.
En drugi proizvajalec izvoznik ni odgovoril na protidampinški vprašalnik po preveritvenem obisku za TGO v prostorih družbe.
All three companies were informed about the proposed application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation and were given the opportunity to comment.
Vse tri družbe so bile obveščene o predlagani uporabi člena 18 osnovne uredbe in so dobile priložnost za pripombe.
Two of the companies that had provided false and misleading information failed to submit any decisive arguments or to provide evidence which might reverse the decision to apply this Article.
Družbi, ki sta dali napačne in zavajajoče informacije, nista predložili nobenih odločilnih argumentov oziroma dokazov, ki bi lahko spremenili odločitev o uporabi tega člena.
The Commission therefore has considered it appropriate to reject the MET claims of these companies and base its findings on facts available.
Zato je Komisija ugotovila, da je zahtevka teh dveh družb za TGO primerno zavrniti in svoje ugotovitve utemeljiti na razpoložljivih dejstvih.
The third company did not react to the above disclosure.
Tretja družba se ni odzvala na zgornje razkritje.
It was concluded that the company no longer wished to cooperate with the proceeding, and findings will therefore be based on facts available.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da družba ne želi več sodelovati v postopku, zato bodo ugotovitve temeljile na razpoložljivih dejstvih.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC, normal value shall be determined in accordance with points 1 to 6 of the said Article for those producers which are found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe se v protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz LRK normalna vrednost določi v skladu s točkami od 1 do 6 navedenega člena za tiste proizvajalce, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
Briefly, and for ease of reference only, the MET criteria are set out in summarised form below:
Merila za TGO so na kratko in samo zaradi lažjega sklicevanja povzeta tako:
firms have one clear set of basic accounting records which are independently audited in line with international accounting standards and are applied for all purposes;
družbe imajo jasno določeno zbirko računovodskih evidenc, ki se neodvisno pregledujejo v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi in uporabljajo v vse namene;
Following the initiation of the proceeding, seven Chinese exporting producers requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation and replied to the MET claim form within the given deadline.
Sedem kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je po začetku postopka zahtevalo TGO v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe in v navedenih rokih izpolnilo obrazec zahtevka za TGO.
For three Chinese exporting producers, Article 18 of the basic Regulation had to be applied (see recitals 23 to 25 above), and therefore their claims for MET were rejected.
Za tri kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike je bilo treba uporabiti člen 18 osnovne uredbe (glej zgornje uvodne izjave od 23 do 25), zato so bili njihovi zahtevki za TGO zavrnjeni.
As regards the remaining four companies or groups of Chinese exporting producers, it was established that none of them met all five MET criteria.
Glede preostalih štirih družb ali skupin kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je bilo ugotovljeno, da nobena ni izpolnjevala vseh petih meril za TGO.
The investigation established that one Chinese exporting producer could not show that it met criterion 3 as it was found that the price paid by the company for land-use rights did not substantially reflect market values and thus represented a significant distortion carried over from the former non-market economy system which influenced the company’s financial situation.
Preiskava je pokazala, da en kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik ni mogel dokazati, da izpolnjuje tretje merilo, saj je bilo ugotovljeno, da cena, ki jo je družba plačala za pravice do uporabe zemljišč, ni bistveno odražala tržnih vrednosti in je tako pomenila znatno izkrivljanje, preneseno iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva, kar je vplivalo na finančni položaj družbe.
After disclosure of the above findings, the company submitted that the low land-use price was a relatively small part of the cost of production and therefore criterion 3 should be considered as fulfilled.
Po razkritju zgornjih ugotovitev je družba utemeljevala, da je bila nizka cena uporabe zemljišča relativno majhen del proizvodnih stroškov, zato bi moralo tretje merilo veljati za izpolnjeno.
However, it is considered that the arbitrary valuation of land-use rights indicates that there are significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system.
Vendar pa velja, da poljubno vrednotenje pravic do uporabe zemljišča kaže na znatna izkrivljanja, prenesena iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva.
Therefore, in the absence of further evidence that the land-use price was representative for the market or that it was set according to business considerations, the argument is provisionally rejected.
Zato je bil argument ob odsotnosti nadaljnjih dokazov o tem, da je bila cena uporabe zemljišč reprezentativna za trg ali da je bila določena v skladu s poslovnimi premisleki, začasno zavrnjen.
A second company could not show that it met criteria 1 to 3.
Druga družba ni mogla dokazati, da izpolnjuje merila od 1 do 3.
Firstly, its decisions regarding sales were not made in response to market signals reflecting supply and demand and without significant State interference.
Prvič, njene odločitve glede prodaje niso bile sprejete kot odgovor na tržne signale, ki odražajo ponudbo in povpraševanje, in brez znatnega vmešavanja države.
In particular, the company was found to benefit from an income tax reduction conditional upon exporting at least 70 % of the production.
Za družbo je bilo še zlasti ugotovljeno, da je imela koristi od znižanja davka od dohodka, ki je bilo pogojeno z izvozom vsaj 70 % proizvodnje.
Secondly, the accounting system of the company was found not to be in line with generally accepted accounting standards.
Drugič, ugotovljeno je bilo, da računovodski sistem družbe ni bil skladen s splošno sprejetimi računovodskimi standardi.
In particular, the depreciation of fixed assets was not correctly applied: the company began the depreciation of assets only in 1997, including of assets that were acquired in 1994.
Predvsem ni bila pravilno uporabljena amortizacija osnovnih sredstev: družba je začela amortizirati sredstva šele leta 1997, vključno s sredstvi, pridobljenimi leta 1994.
Finally, the company failed to prove the absence of possible distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system.
Nazadnje, družba ni dokazala odsotnosti morebitnih izkrivljanj, prenesenih iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva.
In particular, the company could not provide any evidence during the verification regarding the conditions under which their assets had been obtained, and that they had been valued, transferred, accounted for (including write-offs) and depreciated according to their market value.
Zlasti pa med preverjanjem ni mogla predložiti nobenih dokazov o pogojih, pod katerimi je pridobila sredstva, in da so bila ta sredstva ovrednotena, prenesena, knjižena (vključno z odpisi) in amortizirana v skladu s svojo tržno vrednostjo.
The submission provided by the company after disclosure did not provide any new information or evidence to alter these findings, therefore they are provisionally confirmed.
Utemeljitev družbe, predložena po razkritju, ni prinesla nobenih novih informacij ali dokazov, ki bi spremenili te ugotovitve, zato so te začasno potrjene.