natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Three companies belonging to the same group were found to be related to exporting producers in the USA and the group was also itself importing significant quantities of the product concerned from its related exporters in the USA.
Tri družbe, ki spadajo v isto skupino, so bile povezane s proizvajalci izvozniki iz ZDA, pri čemer je tudi sama skupina uvažala velike količine zadevnega izdelka od povezanih izvoznikov v ZDA.
Therefore, these companies were excluded from the notion of Community production within the meaning of Article 9(1) and Article 10(8) of the basic Regulation.
Te družbe so zato bile izključene iz proizvodnje Skupnosti v smislu člena 9(1) in člena 10(8) osnovne uredbe.
It was established that the companies that supported the complaint and agreed to co-operate in the investigation represented more than 60 % of the Community production of biodiesel during the IP indicated in recital (162).
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so družbe, ki so podprle pritožbo in se strinjale s sodelovanjem v preiskavi, predstavljale več kot 60 % proizvodnje biodizla v Skupnosti v OP, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (162).
The company referred in recital (165) below which failed to co-operate with the investigation was not considered as a supporter of the complaint.
Družba iz uvodne izjave (163), ki ni sodelovala v preiskavi, se je obravnavala, kot da pritožbe ni podprla.
It is concluded that the complaint and the investigation are supported by a major proportion of Community production within the meaning of Article 9(1) and Article 10(8) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se je sklenilo, da pritožbo in preiskavo podpira večji delež proizvodnje Skupnosti v smislu člena 9(1) in člena 10(8) osnovne uredbe.
The three companies mentioned in recital (162) were not considered for the sampling exercise for the reasons mentioned in that recital.
Tri družbe iz uvodne izjave (162) niso bile vključene v vzorčenje zaradi razlogov, navedenih v zadevni uvodni izjavi.
From the remaining companies a sample of 11 companies was selected on the basis of the largest representative volume of production and sales within the Community, as indicated in recital (11) above.
Med preostalimi družbami je bil izbran vzorec 11 družb na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega proizvodnje in prodaje v Skupnosti, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (11).
Reference hereafter to ‘Community industry’ or ‘sampled Community producers’ refers to these ten sampled producers.
Sklicevanje na „industrijo Skupnosti“ ali „vzorčene proizvajalce Skupnosti“ se v nadaljnjem besedilu nanaša na teh 10 vzorčenih proizvajalcev.
As mentioned in recital (17) above, the examination of the trends concerning the assessment of injury covered the period from January 2004 to the end of the IP.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (17), je preučitev trendov v zvezi z oceno škode zajela obdobje od januarja 2004 do konca OP.
It was, thus, considered more appropriate to make an analysis based on trends for the period 2005 to the IP (‘period analysed’).
Zato se je zdelo primerneje, da se opravi analiza na podlagi trendov za obdobje od leta 2005 do OP („analizirano obdobje“).
Index 2005=100
Indeks (2005 = 100)
Community consumption was established on the basis of volume of the overall Community production on the Community market of all Community producers, as ascertained in recital (162) above, minus their exports plus imports from the country concerned by this investigation and imports from other third countries.
Potrošnja Skupnosti je bila določena na podlagi obsega celotne proizvodnje Skupnosti vseh proizvajalcev na trgu Skupnosti, kot določa uvodna izjava (162), pri čemer se odšteje njihov izvoz in prišteje uvoz iz države, ki jo zadeva ta preiskava, ter uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav.
However, analysis of this information showed that the Eurostat data could not be used for the purpose of assessing consumption since until the end of 2007 there was no distinct CN code available for the customs classification of the various types of the product concerned.
Vendar je analiza teh informacij pokazala, da se podatki Eurostata ne morejo uporabiti za namene ocenjevanja potrošnje, ker do konca leta 2007 ni bilo jasne oznake KN, ki bi bila na voljo kot carinska oznaka za različne vrste zadevnega izdelka.
Hence, it was considered more appropriate to use the US exports statistics for establishing reliable imports and consumption figures and import trends.
Zato se je zdelo primernejše, da se za določanje zanesljivih podatkov o uvozu in potrošnji ter trendov uvoza uporabijo statistični podatki ZDA o izvozu.
With regard to imports from other countries and exports of the Community producers, in view of the limitation regarding the use of Eurostat data described above, the investigation relied on the data reported in the complaint.
V zvezi z uvozom iz drugih držav in izvozom proizvajalcev Skupnosti se je glede na omejitev v zvezi z uporabo podatkov Eurostata, kot je opisano zgoraj, preiskava oprla na podatke, ki so bili sporočeni v pritožbi.
Based on the above, it was found that Community consumption of biodiesel increased by 107 % between 2005 and 2007 and then slightly decreased in the IP by one percentage point.
Na podlagi navedenega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je potrošnja biodizla v Skupnosti med letoma 2005 in 2007 narasla za 107 % in se nato nekoliko zmanjšala v OP, tj. za eno odstotno točko.
The increase in demand was mainly due to the incentives taken by Member States to promote the use of bio-fuels following the adoption of Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 May 2003 on the promotion of the use of bio-fuels or other renewable fuels for transport [16] and Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity [17].
Večje povpraševanje je bilo zlasti posledica spodbud držav članic k pospeševanju rabe biogoriv po sprejetju Direktive 2003/30/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. maja 2003 o pospeševanju rabe biogoriv in drugih obnovljivih goriv v sektorju prevoza [16] ter Direktive Sveta 2003/96/ES z dne 27. oktobra 2003 o prestrukturiranju okvira Skupnosti za obdavčitev energentov in električne energije [17].
During the period analysed, the subsidised imports from the USA continuously increased their share of the Community market from 0,4 % in 2005 to 17,2 % in the IP.
V analiziranem obdobju se je delež subvencioniranega uvoza iz ZDA na trgu Skupnosti stalno povečeval, tj. z 0,4 % v letu 2005 na 17,2 % v OP.
Therefore, there has been a significant increase in subsidised imports both in absolute terms and in relative terms compared to the Community consumption over that period.
Zato se je v primerjavi s potrošnjo Skupnosti v zadevnem obdobju subvencionirani uvoz bistveno povečal v absolutnih in relativnih vrednostih.
On the other hand the complainant argued that imports of splash and dash, if any, would at most represent 10 % of the US export volumes, and would thus be insignificant and not alter the findings that large quantities of subsidised imports from the USA entered the Community market, in particular during the IP.
Po drugi strani je pritožnik trdil, da je morebiten uvoz splash and dash predstavljal največ 10 % obsega ameriškega izvoza in je zato zanemarljiv ter ne vpliva na ugotovitve o velikem obsegu subvencioniranega uvoza iz ZDA na trg Skupnosti, zlasti v OP.
In the same statistics there were hardly any quantities found to be declared under the ‘Re-Exports’ chapter.
V istih statističnih podatkih je v poglavju Ponovni izvoz navedenih zelo malo količin.
On the basis of the above and taking into account, in particular, that splash and dash exports, if any, were declared with a US origin and deemed as originating in the USA by the US authorities, it was considered that there was no ground to treat them as non-US imports.
Na podlagi navedenega in ob upoštevanju zlasti tega, da je bil morebiten izvoz splash and dash prijavljen kot izvoz s poreklom iz ZDA in so ga ameriški pristojni organi obravnavali kot izvoz s poreklom iz ZDA, se je sklenilo, da ni razloga za obravnavanje tega izvoza kot neameriškega uvoza.
Prices of the subsidised imports and price undercutting
Cene subvencioniranega uvoza in nelojalno nižanje cen
Price in EUR/tonne
Cene v EUR/tono
The US export statistics were also used to establish the price trends of the subsidised imports originating in the USA, in particular for 2007 and the IP.
Statistični podatki ZDA o izvozu so se uporabili tudi za določitev gibanja cen subvencioniranega uvoza s poreklom iz ZDA, zlasti za leto 2007 in OP.
For the purposes of analysing price undercutting, the weighted average sales prices of the sampled Community producers charged to unrelated customers on the Community market, adjusted to an ex-works level, were compared to the corresponding weighted average prices of the imports from the USA, established on a cif basis for the sampled exporting producers in the USA.
Za analizo nelojalnega nižanja cen so se tehtane povprečne prodajne cene vzorčenih proizvajalcev Skupnosti, ki se zaračunavajo nepovezanim strankam na trgu Skupnosti in ki so prilagojene na raven cene franko tovarna, primerjale z ustreznimi tehtanimi povprečnimi cenami za uvoz iz ZDA, določenimi na podlagi CIF za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike v ZDA.
Whilst the main feedstock used in the Community is rapeseed, the US producers use other feedstock such as soybeans, canola, palm, etc. Given that feedstock is by far the main raw material for the production of the product concerned, it was considered that an adjustment for feedstock difference should be granted.
Medtem ko je glavna surovina, ki se uporablja v Skupnosti, repično seme, proizvajalci ZDA uporabljajo druge surovine, kot so soja, kanola, palma itd. Ob upoštevanju, da so te surovine najprimernejše za proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka, je bilo sklenjeno, da je treba odobriti prilagoditev za razliko v surovinah.
In accordance with Article 8(5) of the basic Regulation, the examination of the impact of subsidised imports on the Community industry included an evaluation of all economic indicators established for the Community industry over the period analysed.
V skladu s členom 8(5) osnovne uredbe je preučitev vpliva subvencioniranega uvoza na industrijo Skupnosti vključevala oceno vseh gospodarskih kazalcev, ki so bili v analiziranem obdobju določeni za industrijo Skupnosti.
In line with the evolution of consumption, the volume of sales made by the Community industry on the Community market increased steadily, recording an overall increase of 143 % during the period analysed.
V skladu z razvojem potrošnje se je obseg prodaje industrije Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti stalno večal, pri čemer se je v analiziranem obdobju skupno povečal za 143 %.
The increase in prices was justified in view of the increase of costs of raw materials and other inputs.
Zvišanje cen je bilo upravičeno ob upoštevanju povečanja stroškov surovin in drugih materialov.
During the same time, subsidised imports managed to gain over 16 percentage points of market share.
V istem obdobju je subvencioniranemu uvozu uspelo pridobiti več kot 16 odstotnih točk tržnega deleža.
However, it is considered that because biodiesel cannot be stored for a period of time exceeding 6 months (on average the storage period is only around three months), data related to stocks have only limited value for assessing the economic situation of the Community industry.
Vendar se ocenjuje, da imajo podatki v zvezi z zalogami le omejeno vrednost za oceno gospodarskega položaja industrije Skupnosti, ker biodizla ni mogoče skladiščiti več kot 6 mesecev (povprečno obdobje skladiščenja je le približno tri mesece).
This period coincides with the surge of subsidised imports in the Community market.
To obdobje sovpada z nenadnim povečanjem subvencioniranega uvoza na trg Skupnosti.
It is considered that the deterioration of the return on investments is a clear indication of the deterioration of the economic situation of the Community industry.
Ocenjuje se, da zmanjšanje donosnosti naložb jasno kaže na poslabšanje gospodarskega položaja industrije Skupnosti.
Between 2006 and the IP, however, cash flow has shown a decrease of 15 % signifying a downturn in the latter part of the period analysed when subsidised imports were more present in the Community market.
Vendar se je stopnja denarnega toka med letom 2006 in OP zmanjšala za 15 %, kar kaže na zmanjšanje v zadnjem delu analiziranega obdobja, v katerem je bila prisotnost subvencioniranega uvoza na trgu Skupnosti večja.
Employment — Full time equivalent (FTE)
Zaposlenost – ekvivalent polnega delovnega časa (FTE)
(tonnes/FTE)
(ton/FTE)
Magnitude of the actual margin of subsidisation and recovery from past subsidisation
Višina dejanske stopnje subvencioniranja in okrevanje od preteklega subvencioniranja
The subsidisation margins for exporting producers in the USA are specified above in the subsidisation section and are significantly above de minimis.
Stopnje subvencioniranja za proizvajalce izvoznike v ZDA so navedene zgoraj v oddelku o subvencioniranju in so veliko višje od stopnje de minimis.
Furthermore, given the volumes and the prices of the subsidised imports, the impact of the actual margin of subsidisation cannot be considered to be negligible.
Poleg tega učinka dejanske stopnje subvencioniranja glede na obseg in cene subvencioniranega uvoza ni mogoče obravnavati kot zanemarljivega.
The analysis of data pertaining to the Community market suggested that Community producers other than those included in the sample and the ones mentioned in recital (162) lost considerable market share over the period analysed on the sales of their own produced biodiesel on the Community market.
Analiza podatkov o trgu Skupnosti je pokazala, da so proizvajalci Skupnosti, razen vzorčenih proizvajalcev in proizvajalcev iz uvodne izjave (162), v analiziranem obdobju izgubili znaten tržni delež v prodaji biodizla, ki so ga sami proizvedli, na trgu Skupnosti.
From the information provided by the complainant, it appeared that many of these companies either ceased or reduced their biodiesel activity and were not able to adequately cooperate with the investigation.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je zagotovil pritožnik, se zdi, da so številne te družbe ukinile ali zmanjšale proizvodnjo biodizla in zato niso mogle ustrezno sodelovati v preiskavi.
The above data relating to producers not included in the sample would reinforce the conclusions regarding injury suffered by the sampled Community producers.
Navedeni podatki v zvezi s proizvajalci, ki niso bili zajeti v vzorec, bi okrepili sklepne ugotovitve glede škode, ki so jo utrpeli vzorčeni proizvajalci Skupnosti.
In the context of a growing demand, the investigation showed that the situation of the sampled Community producers improved with regard to volume indicators such as production (+150 %), production capacity (+174 %) and sales volume (+143 %) over the period analysed.
V okviru povečanega povpraševanja je preiskava pokazala, da se je položaj vzorčenih proizvajalcev Skupnosti v analiziranem obdobju izboljšal v zvezi s kazalci obsega, kot so proizvodnja (+150 %), proizvodna zmogljivost (+174 %) in obseg prodaje (+143 %).
The investigation also showed that the sampled Community producers experienced a sharp increase in their costs between 2005 and 2007 (+ 36 %) and between 2005 and the IP (+ 42 %), because of increases in the feedstock prices (mainly rapeseed and soy bean oil), which represent close to 80 % of the full costs of biodiesel.
Preiskava je tudi pokazala, da so se stroški vzorčenih proizvajalcev Skupnosti občutno povečali med letoma 2005 in 2007 (+36 %) ter med letom 2005 in OP (+42 %) zaradi zvišanja cen surovin (zlasti repičnega in sojinega olja), ki predstavljajo skoraj 80 % celotnih stroškov proizvodnje biodizla.
In the light of the foregoing it can be concluded that the Community industry as a whole has suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 8(5) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na navedeno je mogoče sklepati, da je industrija Skupnosti kot celota utrpela znatno škodo v smislu člena 8(5) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 8(6) and Article 8(7) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether the subsidised imports originating in the USA have caused injury to the Community industry to a degree that enables it to be classified as material.
V skladu s členom 8(6) in členom 8(7) osnovne uredbe se je preučilo, ali je subvencionirani uvoz s poreklom iz ZDA povzročil industriji Skupnosti takšno škodo, da jo je mogoče opredeliti kot znatno.
Known factors other than the subsidised imports, which could at the same time be injuring the Community industry, were also examined to ensure that possible injury caused by these other factors was not attributed to the subsidised imports.
Poleg subvencioniranega uvoza so se preučili še drugi faktorji, ki bi istočasno lahko povzročili škodo proizvajalcem Skupnosti, da bi se zagotovilo, da se možna škoda, ki bi jo lahko povzročili ti faktorji, ni pripisala subvencioniranemu uvozu.
The investigation showed that low-priced subsidised imports from the USA significantly increased in terms of volume, namely by 100 times, during the period analysed.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se je obseg poceni subvencioniranega uvoza iz ZDA v analiziranem obdobju znatno povečal, in sicer za 100-krat.
In order to demonstrate the significance of the impact that the surge of the subsidised imports from the USA had on the Community, it is noted that an increase in market share of 16,8 percentage points was achieved within a period of 15 months.
Za ponazoritev pomembnosti učinka nenadnega povečanja subvencioniranega uvoza iz ZDA na Skupnost, je treba poudariti, da je bilo povečanje tržnega deleža za 16,8 odstotne točke doseženo v 15 mesecih.
The average prices of the subsidised imports increased by 7 % between 2005 and the IP, but were significantly lower than those of the Community industry during the same period.
Povprečne cene subvencioniranega uvoza so se med letom 2005 in OP povečale za 7 %, vendar so bile znatno nižje od cen industrije Skupnosti v istem obdobju.
Hence, the prices of the subsidised imports significantly undercut Community industry prices with an average undercutting margin of 25 % during the IP.
Torej so cene subvencioniranega uvoza znatno nelojalno nižale cene industrije Skupnosti, pri čemer je povprečna stopnja nelojalno znižanih cen v OP znašala 25 %.
The pressure exercised by the surge of low-priced subsidised imports on the Community market did not allow the Community industry to set its sales prices in line with market conditions and the cost increases.
Pritisk, ki se je izvajal z nenadnim povečanjem poceni subvencioniranega uvoza na trg Skupnosti, je industriji Skupnosti preprečeval, da bi svoje prodajne cene določala v skladu s tržnimi razmerami in povečanjem stroškov.
However, as shown in recital (211) above these increases in costs were not reflected in the prices of the subsidised imports.
Vendar to povečanje stroškov ni vplivalo na cene subvencioniranega uvoza, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (211).
In order to further demonstrate the causal link between the surge of low-priced subsidised imports from the USA and the injury suffered by the Community industry, the situation on the Community market in the period 2005 to 2006, when subsidised imports were not present, was compared to the situation prevailing in the market between 2006 to the IP, when the surge of low-priced subsidised imports took place.
Da bi se dodatno pokazala vzročna zveza med nenadnim povečanjem poceni subvencioniranega uvoza iz ZDA in škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, so se razmere na trgu Skupnosti v obdobju 2005–2006, ko subvencionirani uvoz ni bil prisoten, primerjale s prevladujočimi razmerami na trgu med letom 2006 in OP, ko se je poceni subvencionirani uvoz nenadno povečal.
In the period from 2005 to 2006, when subsidised imports were absent from the Community market, consumption increased by around 1,8 million tonnes.
V obdobju 2005–2006, ko subvencionirani uvoz ni bil prisoten na trgu Skupnosti, se je potrošnja povečala za približno 1,8 milijona ton.
Low-priced subsidised imports from the USA started to penetrate the market.
Na trg je začel prodirati poceni subvencionirani uvoz iz ZDA.
Although the market continued to expand by 1,6 million tonnes, most of this market increase (over 1 million tonnes) was taken by the subsidised imports from the USA.
Čeprav se je trg še naprej širil za 1,6 milijona ton, je večino tega povečanja (več kot 1 milijon ton) predstavljal subvencionirani uvoz iz ZDA.
Based on the above, it is provisionally concluded that the low-priced subsidised imports from the USA, which significantly undercut the prices of the Community industry during the IP and which also significantly increased in volume, have had a determining role in the material injury suffered by the Community industry, which is reflected in particular in the deterioration of its financial situation during the IP.
Na podlagi navedenega se začasno sklene, da je bil poceni subvencionirani uvoz iz ZDA, ki je znatno nelojalno znižal cene industrije Skupnosti v OP in se je tudi znatno povečal v obsegu, odločilen za znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti in ki se odraža zlasti v poslabšanju finančnega položaja industrije Skupnosti v OP.
Import volumes from third countries could not be accurately assessed in the investigation for the reasons explained in recital (171) above.
Obsega uvoza iz tretjih držav v preiskavi ni bilo mogoče natančno oceniti iz razlogov, ki so navedeni v uvodni izjavi (171).
It was therefore provisionally concluded that imports from other third countries cannot have made more than negligible contribution to the injury suffered by the Community industry.
Zato se je začasno sklenilo, da uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav ni znatno prispeval k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
In view of the significant growth in demand over the period considered and the period analysed, the material injury suffered by the Community industry during the IP cannot be attributed to the negligible contraction in demand (–0,5 %) observed on the Community market between 2007 and the IP.
Ob upoštevanju znatnega povečanja povpraševanja v obravnavanem in analiziranem obdobju znatne škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti v OP, ni mogoče pripisati zanemarljivemu zmanjšanju povpraševanja na trgu Skupnosti (–0,5 %), ki je bilo ugotovljeno med letom 2007 in OP.
One interested party alleged that the reintroduction of energy taxes in Germany for biodiesel [19], would have negatively influenced the economic situation of Community producers supplying that particular Member State.
Ena od zainteresiranih strank je trdila, da je ponovna uvedba davkov na energijo za biodizel [19] v Nemčiji negativno vplivala na gospodarski položaj proizvajalcev Skupnosti, ki dobavljajo tej državi članici.
Based on the above, it is considered that decisions taken by public authorities in the Community cannot break the casual link between the subsidised imports and the material injury suffered by the Community industry.
Na podlagi navedenega se ocenjuje, da odločitve javnih organov v Skupnosti ne morejo prekiniti vzročne zveze med subvencioniranim uvozom in znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
Even if it is a fact that the production capacity of the Community industry increased (+ 189 %) relatively more than the demand (+ 106 %), it is noteworthy that the main cost drivers in the biodiesel production are the variable costs.
Kljub dejstvu, da se je proizvodna zmogljivost industrije Skupnosti povečala razmeroma bolj (+189 %) kot povpraševanje (+106 %), je treba omeniti, da so spremenljivi stroški glavni stroški proizvodnje biodizla.
Indeed, as mentioned in recital (211) above, raw material for the production of biodiesel represents 80 % of full costs.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (211), surovine za proizvodnjo biodizla predstavljajo 80 % celotnih stroškov.
In addition, it is noteworthy that as mentioned in Table 4 above, the capacity utilisation rate of the sampled Community producers was 80 % during the IP.
Poleg tega je treba omeniti, da je stopnja izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti vzorčenih proizvajalcev Skupnosti v OP znašala 80 %, kot je navedeno v preglednici 4.