natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Competition between economic entities active in combined transport of goods is thus developing beyond the boundaries of the different Member States.
Konkurenčnost med gospodarskimi subjekti, ki se ukvarjajo s kombiniranim prevozom blaga, se tako razvija prek meja različnih držav članic.
The geographical position of the Czech Republic makes the development of competition between operators of combined transport within and outside this Member State relatively stronger than in other parts of the Community.
Zaradi geografskega lege Češke se razvoj konkurence med upravljavci kombiniranega prevoza znotraj in zunaj te države članice krepi sorazmerno močneje kot v drugih delih Skupnosti.
The intended measure will support combined transport operators which develop activity within the Czech Republic, in competition with other operators who develop their activity in the neighbouring Member States.
Predvideni ukrep bo spodbujal izvajalce kombiniranega prevoza na Češkem, ki konkurirajo z drugimi upravljavci, ki se s svojo dejavnostjo ukvarjajo v sosednjih državah članicah.
As such, it is liable to distort competition and affects trade between Member States.
Kot tak bi lahko izkrivljal konkurenco in prizadel trgovino med državami članicami.
In view of those facts, the Commission finds that the notified aid scheme involves aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty and is hence, in principle, prohibited by virtue of that Article, unless it may be deemed compatible with the common market by virtue of any of the exemptions provided for in the Treaty or secondary legislation.
Glede na navedena dejstva Komisija meni, da priglašena shema pomoči vključuje pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES in je zato načeloma prepovedana, razen če jo je mogoče šteti za združljivo s skupnim trgom na podlagi izjem, predvidenih v Pogodbi ali sekundarni zakonodaji.
APPRAISAL OF THE COMPATIBILITY OF THE AID MEASURE
OCENA ZDRUŽLJIVOSTI UKREPA POMOČI
In the absence of a more specific provision, the notified scheme can only be assessed upon the basis of Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty.
Ker ni druge posebne določbe, se lahko priglašena shema oceni le na podlagi člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe.
Article 87(3)(c) states that aid to facilitate the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic areas may be considered to be compatible with the common market where such aid does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Člen 87(3)(c) določa, da se pomoč za pospeševanje razvoja določenih gospodarskih dejavnosti ali določenih gospodarskih območij šteje kot združljiva s skupnim trgom, kadar takšna pomoč ne spreminja trgovinskih pogojev v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
The Community has for some time pursued a policy of achieving a balanced intermodal transport system and the fostering of the competitiveness of combined transport vis-à-vis road is part and parcel of this policy.
Skupnost si že nekaj časa prizadeva za politiko uravnoteženega kombiniranega prevoza, katere del je spodbujanje konkurenčnosti kombiniranega prevoza v primerjavi s cestnim prometom.
The aim of EC combined transport policy is to achieve a modal shift from road to other modes of transport.
Cilj politike ES glede kombiniranega prevoza je doseči modalno preusmeritev od cestnega k drugim vrstam prevoza.
Community instruments such as Directive 92/106/EEC aim explicitly at fostering the development of combined transport, as confirmed in the fourth recital of that Directive.
Instrumenti Skupnosti, kot je Direktiva 92/106/EGS, si prizadevajo za spodbujanje razvoja kombiniranega prevoza, kar je potrjeno v četrti uvodni izjavi navedene direktive.
The White Paper on Transport Policy encourages the use of rail and other environmentally friendly modes of transport in order to become competitive alternatives to road haulage.
Bela knjiga o prometni politiki spodbuja uporabo železnice in drugih okolju prijaznih vrst prevoza, da bi postale konkurenčno nadomestilo cestnemu prevozu blaga.
Intermodal policy is an initiative to take the pressure off the road freight sector, and is in line with the conclusions of the European Council of Gothenburg of June 2001 which has declared that measures helping modal shift from road transport to more environmentally friendly modes are at the heart of the policy for sustainable transport.
Intermodalna politika je pobuda za zmanjšanje pritiska na cestni tovorni sektor in je skladna s sklepi, ki jih je sprejel Evropski svet v Gothenburgu junija 2001, v katerih je naznanil, da so ukrepi za modalno preusmeritev cestnega prometa k okolju prijaznejšim vrstam bistvo politike trajnostnega prevoza.
Furthermore, today, Europe’s industry maintains or increases the competitiveness of its Europe-based production largely by advanced logistics, optimising production and distribution, and creating value in the process.
Poleg tega evropska industrija danes ohranja ali povečuje konkurenčnost evropskega dela proizvodnje predvsem z napredno logistiko, optimiziranjem proizvodnje in distribucije ter ustvarjanjem vrednosti v procesu.
These sophisticated supply chains are increasingly vulnerable to the decreasing reliability and increasing costs of road freight.
Te visoko razvite dobavne verige so vse bolj izpostavljene vedno manjši zanesljivosti in vedno večjim stroškom v cestnem tovornem prometu.
Intermodal logistics will thus have to become a prime occupation for Europe’s production industry, in order to maintain productive assets and processes in Europe.
Evropska proizvodna industrija se bo zato morala osredotočiti na intermodalno logistiko, če bo želela ohraniti proizvodne zmogljivosti in proizvodne procese v Evropi.
Intermodal transport is a complex transport option, involving various actors with various business models, in a fragmented and small-scale environment, often still separated by modal cultures and along national lines.
Kombinirani prevoz je kompleksna izbira prevoza, ki vključuje različne akterje z različnimi poslovnimi modeli. Ta trg je zelo razdrobljen in omejen, zanj pa so značilne različne prometne in nacionalne značilnosti.
The Commission recognises that it is in the first place the task of market operators to improve intermodal transport within markets, whose access is free and where the rules of free competition and supply and demand prevail.
Komisija meni, da je prednostna naloga akterjev na trgu izboljšati intermodalni prevoz na trgih, do katerih je dostop prost in na katerih vladajo pravila svobodne konkurence, ponudbe in povpraševanja.
However, in order to fully unleash the potential of intermodal transport, the willingness to take risks inherent in switching from road to the alternative modes, needs to be stimulated.
Da bi popolnoma izkoristili vse možnosti, ki jih nudi intermodalni prevoz, je potrebno spodbujati pripravljenost na tveganje, povezano s prehodom s cestnega na alternativne vrste prevoza.
Many transport companies are operating today in markets in full restructuring.
Veliko prevoznih družb danes deluje na trgih, ki so v procesu prestrukturiranja.
Their margins are low, planning is difficult, and the future uncertain.
Njihovi dobički so majhni, načrtovanje zapleteno, prihodnost pa negotova.
Therefore, practical and market-oriented support programmes need to be devised to help the intermodal sector take risks and respond to the challenge of achieving a sustained and large modal shift, in line with the targets set in the Commission White Paper of 2001.
Zato je treba razviti praktične in tržno naravnane podporne programe, ki bi intermodalnemu sektorju pomagali prevzeti tveganja in odgovoriti na izzive, ki jih prinaša trajen in obsežen prehod prometa, v skladu s cilji Bele knjige 2001.
The proposed aid is intended for the purchase of special railway wagons intended for use only in combined transport, which cannot be used for other rail-transport purposes on account of their special design.
Predlagana pomoč je namenjena nakupu posebnih železniških vagonov, namenjenih uporabi izključno pri kombiniranem prevozu, ki jih zaradi njihove posebne oblike ni mogoče uporabiti za druge namene železniškega prometa.
The Commission considers that the explanations provided by the Czech authorities in their letter dated 9 May 2006, referred to in recitals 20 to 27 of this Decision, clearly indicate that the special wagons are exclusively dedicated to combined transport operations due to their special design (specific construction), adapted exclusively for the carriage of intermodal transport units, which makes it difficult to use these wagons for carrying goods in the same way as other railway wagons.
Komisija meni, da obrazložitve, ki so jih češki organi posredovali v dopisu z dne 9. maja 2006 in so navedene v uvodnih izjavah 20 do 27 te odločbe, jasno kažejo, da so posebni vagoni zaradi posebne zgradbe (posebne oblike), prilagojene izključno za prevozne enote kombiniranega prometa, namenjene izključno kombiniranemu prevozu, kar otežuje uporabo teh vagonov za prevoz blaga na enak način kot drugih železniških vagonov.
The Commission in its practice has considered State aid for the acquisition of equipment designed exclusively for combined transport, in particular wagons of such specific conditions, compatible with Treaty rules.
Komisija je do sedaj državno pomoč za nakup opreme za izključno kombinirani prevoz, zlasti vagonov takšnih posebnih pogojev, štela kot združljivo s pravili Pogodbe.
In addition, the Commission considers that to modernise or renew rolling stock in the field of rail transport is necessary in order to avoid further fall in rail transport’s market share compared with other, less sustainable and more environmentally damaging, transport modes.
Komisija poleg tega meni, da je posodobitev in/ali prenova voznega parka na področju železniškega prevoza nujna za preprečitev nadaljnjega zmanjševanja tržnega deleža železniškega prevoza v primerjavi z drugimi, manj trajnostnimi in okolju bolj škodljivimi načini prevoza.
No affectation of trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest
Trgovinski pogoji niso spremenjeni v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi
The Commission considers that in the line with established practice, the limitation of the planned aid’s intensity to 30 % will ensure that trading conditions are not affected contrary to the common interest.
Komisija meni, da bo omejitev načrtovane intenzivnosti pomoči na 30 % v skladu z ustaljeno prakso zagotovila, da trgovinski pogoji ne bodo spremenjeni v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
Conclusion: compatibility pursuant to Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty
Sklepna ugotovitev: združljivost na podlagi člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES
The Commission therefore concludes that the aid for the purchase of certain types of wagons to be used in combined transport at issue in the present case can be considered compatible with the EC Treaty in accordance with Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty in as much as they will not distort trade in a manner contrary to the common interest,
Komisija zato sklepa, da se pomoč za nakup nekaterih vrst vagonov za uporabo pri kombiniranem prevozu, ki se obravnava v tem primeru, šteje kot združljiva s Pogodbo ES v skladu s členom 87(3)(c) Pogodbe, kolikor ne bo prizadela trgovine na način, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi –
The State aid which the Czech Republic is planning to implement as regards the purchase of certain types of wagons for the use of combined transport is compatible with the common market pursuant to Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty.
Državna pomoč, ki jo namerava izvesti Češka republika za nakup nekaterih vrst vagonov za uporabo pri kombiniranem prevozu, je združljiva s skupnim trgom na podlagi člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES.
Implementation of the aid is accordingly authorised.
Izvedba pomoči se zato odobri.
OJ C 150, 28.6.2006, p. 35.
UL C 150, 28.6.2006, str. 35.
See, in particular, Case 730/79 Philip Morris v Commission [1980] ECR 2671, paragraph 11; Case C-53/00 Ferring [2001] ECR I-9067, paragraph 21; and Case C-372/97 Italy v Commission, [2004] ECR I-3679, paragraph 44.
Glej zlasti zadevo Philip Morris proti Komisiji (730/79, Recueil, str. 2671, točka 11), zadevo Ferring (C-53/00, 53/00, Recueil, str. I-9067, točka 21) in zadevo Italija proti Komisiji (C-372/97, Recueil, str. I-3679, točka 44).
White Paper; European transport policy for 2010: time to decide, COM(2001) 370.
Bela knjiga; Evropska prometna politika za leto 2010: čas odločitev, COM(2001) 370.
Accessible at the following web link: http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/docs/key_docs/goteborg_concl_en.pdf (point 29).
Dostopno na spletni strani: http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/docs/key_docs/goteborg_concl_en.pdf (točka 29).
Decision of 22 December 2006, Case N 575/06 — Italy (OJ C 139, 23.6.2007, p. 11); Decision of 6 April 2006, Case N 132/05 — Czech Republic (OJ C 150, 28.6.2006, p. 35); Decision of 8 September 2004, Case N 140/04 — Austria (OJ C 126, 25.5.2005, p. 10); Decision of 19 February 2002, Case N 566/02 — Belgium (OJ C 248, 16.10.2003, p. 3); Decision of 11 November 2003, Case N 134/01 — Italy (OJ C 311, 20.12.2003, p. 18); Decision of 24 July 2002, Case N 833/01 — Italy (OJ C 242, 8.10.2002, p. 8); Decision of 22 October 1997, Case N 79/97 — The Netherlands (OJ C 377, 12.12.1997, p. 3); Decision of 4 May 1999, C 21/98 — Italy (OJ L 227, 28.8.1999, p. 12); Decision of 21 December 2000, N 508/99 — Italy (OJ C 71, 3.3.2001, p. 21); and Decision of 8 July 1999, Case N 121/99 — Austria (OJ C 245, 28.8.1999, p. 2).
Odločba z dne 22. decembra 2006, zadeva N 575/06 – Italija (UL C 139, 23.6.2007, str. 11); odločba z dne 6. aprila 2006, zadeva N 132/05 – Češka republika (UL C 150, 28.6.2006, str. 35); odločba z dne 8. septembra 2004, zadeva N 140/04 – Avstrija (UL C 126, 25.5.2005, str. 10); odločba z dne 19. februarja 2002, zadeva N 566/02 – Belgija (UL C 248, 16.10.2003, str. 3); odločba z dne 11. novembra 2003, zadeva N 134/01 – Italija (UL C 311, 20.12.2003, str. 18); odločba z dne 24. julija 2002, zadeva N 833/01 – Italija (UL C 242, 8.10.2002, str. 8); odločba z dne 22. oktobra 1997, zadeva N 79/97 – Nizozemska (UL C 377, 12.12.1997, str. 3); odločba z dne 4. maja 1999, C 21/98 – Italija (UL L 227, 28.8.1999, str. 12); odločba z dne 21. decembra 2000, N 508/99 – Italija (UL C 71, 3.3.2001, str. 21), odločba z dne 8. julija 1999, zadeva N 121/99 – Avstrija (UL C 245, 28.8.1999, str. 2).
Decision of 27 February 2002, Case C 644/01 — Austria (OJ C 88, 12.4.2002, p. 16).
Odločba z dne 27. februarja 2002, zadeva C 644/01 – Avstrija (UL C 88, 12.4.2002, str. 16).
See also Decision of 12 September 2007, Case N 76/07 — Austria (not yet published in the Official Journal of the European Union).
Glej tudi Odločbo z dne 12. septembra 2007, zadeva N 76/07 – Avstrija, ki še ni objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Decision of 20 December 2006, Case C 46/04 (ex NN 65/04) — France, recitals 176 and 177 (OJ L 112, 30.4.2007, p. 41).
Odločba dne 20. decembra 2006, zadeva C 46/04 (ex NN 65/04) – Francija, uvodni izjavi 176 in 177 (UL L 112, 30.4.2007, str. 41).
See Commission Decision of 22 December 2006, Case N 575/06 — Italy — Region of Friuli-Venezia Giulia — prolongation of the existing authorised aid scheme N 134/01 — Italy — Region of Friuli-Venezia Giulia — Draft Law No 06/1-A — Aid for the establishment of infrastructure and services in the goods transport sector, for the restructuring of road haulage and the development of combined transport (not yet published); Commission Decision of 13 September 2006, Case N 196/06 — Austria — Guidelines on aid for transhipment systems in intermodal transport (OJ C 280, 18.11.2006); Decision of 6 April 2006, State aid N 132/05 — Czech Republic (OJ C 150, 28.6.2006, p. 35); Commission Decision of 25 January 2006, Case N 247/04 — Belgium — Aide au transport combiné de Région wallonne (OJ C 136, 3.6.2005, p. 43); Commission Decision of 25 January 2006, N 160/05 — Poland — Aid scheme for development of intermodal systems (OJ C 272, 9.11.2006, p. 10); Commission Decision of 16 March 2005, Case N 238/04 — Germany — Aid scheme for funding of new combined transport traffic (OJ C 136, 3.6.2005, p. 43); Commission Decision of 19 February 2002, N 566/02 — Belgium — Decision of the Flemish Government on aid for combined transport in the context of economic expansion legislation (OJ C 248, 16.10.2003); Commission Decision of 9 December 1998, Case N 598/98 — The Netherlands (OJ C 29, 4.2.1999, p. 13); Commission Decision of 8 July 1999, Case N 121/99 — Austria (OJ C 245, 28.8.1999, p. 2); Commission Decision of 4 May 1999, Case N 508/99 — Italy — Region of Bozen-Alto Adige — Law 4/97 (OJ C 71, 3.3.2001, p. 21); Commission Decision of 15 November 2000, Case N 755/99 — Italy — Region of Bozen-Alto Adige — Law No 8/98 (OJ C 71, 3.3.2001, p. 19).
Glej Odločbo Komisije z dne 22.12.2006, zadeva N 575/06 – Italija – dežela Furlanija-Julijska krajina – podaljšanje obstoječe odobrene sheme pomoči N 134/01– Italija – dežela Furlanija-Julijska krajina – osnutek zakona št. 106/1-A – Pomoč za vzpostavitev infrastrukture in storitev v sektorju prevoza blaga, prestrukturiranje cestnega prevoza tovora in razvoj kombiniranega prevoza (še ni objavljena); Odločbo Komisije z dne 13. septembra 2006, zadeva N 196/06 – Avstrija – Smernice o pomoči za sisteme pretovarjanja v kombiniranem prevozu (UL C 280, 18.11.2006); Odločbo z dne 6. aprila 2006, državna pomoč N 132/05 – Češka republika (UL C 150, 28.6.2006, str. 35); Odločbo Komisije z dne 25. januarja 2006, zadeva N 247/04 – Belgija – Aide au transport combiné de Région wallonne (UL C 136, 3.6.2005, str. 43); Odločbo Komisije z dne 25. januarja 2006, N 160/05 – Poljska – Shema pomoči za razvoj intermodalnih sistemov (UL C 272, 9.11.2006, str. 10); Odločbo Komisije z dne 16. marca 2005, zadeva N 238/04 – Nemčija – Shema pomoči za financiranje prometa novega kombiniranega prevoza (UL C 136, 3.6.2005, str. 43); Odločbo Komisije z dne 19. februarja 2002, N 566/02 – Belgija – Odločba flamske vlade o pomoči za kombinirani prevoz v okviru zakonodaje za pospeševanje gospodarske rasti (UL C 248, 16.10.2003); Odločbo Komisije z dne 9. decembra 1998, zadeva N 598/98 – Nizozemska (UL C 29, 4.2.1999, str. 13).
By letter dated 19 May 2005 the Commission asked further questions regarding this scheme to which the Czech authorities replied by letter registered by DG TREN on 11 July 2005.
V dopisu z dne 19. maja 2005 je Komisija predložila nadaljnja vprašanja v zvezi s to shemo, na katera so češki organi odgovorili z dopisom, ki ga je GD TREN prejel 11. julija 2005.
A technical meeting between the Czech authorities and the Commission services took place on 14 June 2005.
Dne 14. junija 2005 so imeli češki organi in službe Komisije tehnični sestanek.
The reply to this request was sent by the Czech authorities by letter dated on 5 October 2005.
Odgovor na to zahtevo so češki organi poslali v dopisu z dne 5. oktobra 2005.
A third request of information was sent by letter on 1 December 2005.
Tretja zahteva za predložitev informacij je bila poslana v dopisu z dne 1. decembra 2005.
Additional information was submitted to the Commission on 27 April 2007.
Dodatne informacije so Komisiji predložili 27. aprila 2007.
By letter of 28 June 2007, the Czech authorities informed the Commission on new modifications introduced in the scheme as regards the purchase of certain types of wagons for the use of combined transport.
Češki organi so v dopisu z dne 28. junija 2007 obvestili Komisijo o novih spremembah sheme za nakup nekaterih vrst vagonov za uporabo pri kombiniranem prevozu.
According to the UIC international letter marking system, these are wagons in the S category, or possibly the L category. Category ‘S’ means a flat, bogie wagon of a specific construction, while category ‘L’ means a flat, two-axle wagon of a specific construction.
V skladu z mednarodnim sistemom črkovnih oznak UIC se ti vagoni uvrščajo v kategorijo S ali morda kategorijo L. Kategorija „S“ pomeni raven vagon na kolesih s posebno zgradbo, medtem ko kategorija „L“ pomeni raven, dvoosni vagon s posebno zgradbo.
Council Directive 92/106/EEC of 7 December 1992 on the establishment of common rules for certain types of combined transport of goods between Member States has liberalised the combined transport operations referred to in its Article 1 from all quota systems and systems of authorisation since 1 July 1993.
V skladu z Direktivo Sveta 92/106/EGS z dne 7. decembra 1992 o določitvi skupnih pravil za nekatere vrste kombiniranega prevoza blaga med državami članicami, je kombinirani prevoz, naveden v členu 1, od 1. julija 1993 izvzet iz vseh sistemov kvot in dovoljenj.
Since then, undertakings are progressively becoming active in several Member States, and intra-community trade has started to develop.
Od takrat dalje postopoma postajajo podjetja dejavna v več državah članicah, trgovina v Skupnosti pa se je začela razvijati.
As regards the condition of use of State resources, the measure envisaged establishes that the selected beneficiaries will receive a State contribution. The State is responsible for the provision of such financial contributions.
V zvezi s pogojem uporabe državnih sredstev predvideni ukrep določa, da bodo izbrani upravičenci prejeli državna sredstva, ki jih mora zagotoviti država.
of 10 March 2009
z dne 10. marca 2009
authorising the placing on the market of products containing or produced from genetically modified oilseed rape T45 (ACS-BNØØ8-2) resulting from the commercialisation of this oilseed rape in third countries until 2005 pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o izdaji dovoljenja za dajanje na trg proizvodov, ki vsebujejo gensko spremenjeno oljno ogrščico T45 (ACS-BNØØ8-2) ali so iz nje proizvedeni, zaradi trženja te oljne ogrščice v tretjih državah do leta 2005 v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1829/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(notified under document number C(2009) 1541)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 1541)
On 28 October 2005, Bayer CropScience AG submitted to the competent authority of the United Kingdom an application, in accordance with Articles 5 and 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, for the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients, and feed containing or produced from T45 oilseed rape.
Bayer CropScience AG je 28. oktobra 2005 v skladu s členoma 5 in 17 Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 pristojnemu organu Združenega kraljestva predložil vlogo za dajanje na trg živil, živilskih sestavin in krme, ki vsebujejo oljno ogrščico T45 ali so iz nje proizvedeni.
The application also covers the placing on the market of other products containing T45 oilseed rape for the same uses as any other oilseed rape with the exception of cultivation.
Vloga prav tako zajema dajanje na trg drugih proizvodov, ki vsebujejo oljno ogrščico T45 za enako uporabo kot katera koli druga vrsta oljne ogrščice, razen za gojenje.
Therefore, in accordance with Articles 5(5) and 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, it includes the data and information required by Annexes III and IV to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC [2] and information and conclusions about the risk assessment carried out in accordance with the principles set out in Annex II to Directive 2001/18/EC.
Zato vloga v skladu s členoma 5(5) in 17(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 vključuje podatke in informacije iz prilog III in IV k Direktivi 2001/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. marca 2001 o namernem sproščanju gensko spremenjenih organizmov v okolje in razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 90/220/EGS [2] ter informacije in sklepe ocene tveganja, ki je bila izvedena v skladu z načeli iz Priloge II k Direktivi 2001/18/ES.