natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is therefore considered that the circumstances that led to the initiation of this review are unlikely to change in the foreseeable future in a manner that would affect the findings of the current review.
V skladu s tem se okoliščine, ki so privedle do začetka tega pregleda, v predvidljivi prihodnosti verjetno ne bodo toliko spremenile, da bi vplivale na ugotovitve iz sedanjega pregleda.
Therefore the changes are considered to be of a lasting nature.
Zato se spremembe štejejo za trajne.
In the light of the results of the investigation, it is considered appropriate to amend the anti-dumping duty applicable to imports of the product concerned from TMK to 27,2 %.
Glede na rezultate preiskave se zdi primerno spremeniti protidampinško dajatev, ki se uporablja za uvoz zadevnega izdelka družbe TMK, na 27,2 %.
The amended anti-dumping duty should be set at the level of the dumping margin found, as it is lower than the injury margin established in the original investigation.
Spremenjeno protidampinško dajatev je treba določiti na ravni ugotovljene stopnje dampinga, saj je nižja od stopnje škode, ugotovljene s prvotno preiskavo.
Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend an amendment of Regulation (EC) No 954/2006 and were given an opportunity to comment.
Zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravalo priporočiti spremembo Uredbe (ES) št. 954/2006, in dana jim je bila možnost, da izrazijo pripombe.
Following the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend amending the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to imports of the product concerned from TMK, the group offered a price undertaking in accordance with Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in ugotovitev, na podlagi katerih se je nameravalo priporočiti spremembo dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz zadevnega izdelka TMK, je skupina ponudila cenovno zavezo v skladu s členom 8(1) osnovne uredbe.
The undertaking offered by TMK did not alter the Commission’s initial conclusion that the product concerned is not suitable for an undertaking as set out in recitals 248 to 250 of Regulation (EC) No 954/2006.
Zaveza, ki jo je ponudila družba, ni spremenila prvotnega sklepa Komisije iz uvodnih izjav 248–250 Uredbe (ES) št. 954/2006, da zadevni izdelek ni primeren za zavezo.
Indeed, the Commission considers that TMK’s current undertaking offer does not address the technical difficulties relating to the product concerned as stated in recital 248 of the above mentioned Regulation to an extent that would make the offered price undertaking practicable,
Komisija meni, da sedanja ponudba TMK za zavezo ne obravnava v zadostni meri tehničnih omejitev v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom iz uvodne izjave 248 zgoraj omenjene uredbe, da bi ponujena cenovna zaveza bila izvedljiva –
The following is added to the table in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 954/2006:
V preglednici iz člena 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 954/2006 se doda naslednje:
OAO Volzhsky Pipe Plant, OAO Taganrog Metallurgical Works, OAO Sinarsky Pipe Plant and OAO Seversky Tube Works
OAO Volzhsky Pipe Plant, OAO Taganrog Metallurgical Works, OAO Sinarsky Pipe Plant in OAO Seversky Tube Works
OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 4.
UL L 175, 29.6.2006, str. 4.
OJ C 138, 22.6.2007, p. 37.
UL C 138, 22.6.2007, str. 37.
As presently defined in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1214/2007 of 20 September 2007 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 286, 31.10.2007, p. 1).
V skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1214/2007 z dne 20. septembra 2007 o spremembi Priloge I k Uredbi Sveta (EGS) št. 2658/87 o carinski in statistični nomenklaturi in o skupni carinski tarifi (UL L 286, 31.10.2007, str. 1).
The product coverage is determined in combining the product description in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 954/2006 and the product description of the corresponding CN codes taken together.
Seznam izdelkov je določen z združitvijo opisa izdelka iz člena 1(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 954/2006 in opisa izdelka ustreznih oznak KN.
Council Regulation (EC) No 813/2008
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 813/2008
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1],
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2026/97 z dne 6. oktobra 1997 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1],
Having regard to Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 74/2004 of 13 January 2004 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of cotton-type bed linen originating in India [2],
ob upoštevanju člena 2 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 74/2004 z dne 13. januarja 2004 o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve na uvoz bombažnega posteljnega perila s poreklom iz Indije [2],
By Regulation (EC) No 74/2004 (the original Regulation), the Council imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports into the Community of cotton-type bedlinen falling within CN codes ex63022100 (TARIC codes 6302210081, 6302210089), ex63022290 (TARIC code 6302229019), ex63023100 (TARIC code 6302310090) and ex63023290 (TARIC code 6302329019), originating in India.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 74/2004 („prvotna uredba“) uvedel dokončno izravnalno dajatev na uvoz bombažnega posteljnega perila s poreklom iz Indije v Skupnost, ki se uvršča pod oznake KN ex63022100 (oznaki TARIC 6302210081, 6302210089), ex63022290 (oznaka TARIC 6302229019), ex63023100 (oznaka TARIC 6302310090) in ex63023290 (oznaka TARIC 6302329019).
Given the large number of cooperating exporting producers of the product concerned in India, a sample of Indian exporting producers was selected in accordance with Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 (the basic Regulation) and individual duty rates ranging from 4,4 % to 10,4 % were imposed on the companies included in the sample, while other cooperating companies not included in the sample were attributed a duty rate of 7,6 %.
Glede na veliko število sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov zadevnega izdelka v Indiji je bil vzorec proizvajalcev izvoznikov izbran v skladu s členom 27 Uredbe (ES) št. 2026/97 („osnovna uredba“), individualna stopnja dajatve v višini od 4,4 % do 10,4 % pa je bila uvedena za družbe, vključene v vzorec, medtem ko je bila drugim sodelujočim družbam, ki niso bile vključene v vzorec, določena stopnja dajatve v višini 7,6 %.
Article 2 of the original Regulation stipulates that where any new exporting producer in India provides sufficient evidence to the Commission that it did not export to the Community the products described in Article 1(1) of that Regulation during the investigation period (1 October 2001 to 30 September 2002) (the first criterion), that it is not related to any of the exporters or producers in India which are subject to the anti-subsidy measures imposed by that Regulation (the second criterion) and that it has actually exported to the Community the products concerned after the investigation period on which the measures are based, or that it has entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export a significant quantity of the product concerned to the Community (the third criterion), then Article 1(3) of that Regulation may be amended by granting the new exporting producers the duty rate applicable to the cooperating companies not included in the sample, i.e. 7,6 %.
Člen 2 prvotne uredbe določa, da kadar kateri koli nov proizvajalec izvoznik v Indiji Komisiji zagotovi zadostne dokaze, da v obdobju preiskave (od 1. oktobra 2001 do 30. septembra 2002) ni izvažal izdelkov iz člena 1(1) navedene uredbe (prvi pogoj) v Skupnost, da ni povezan z nobenim izvoznikom ali proizvajalcem v Indiji, za katerega veljajo protisubvencijski ukrepi iz navedene uredbe (drugi pogoj), in da je v Skupnost dejansko izvažal zadevne izdelke po obdobju preiskave, na katerem temeljijo ukrepi, ali je prevzel nepreklicno pogodbeno obveznost za izvoz znatne količine zadevnih izdelkov v Skupnost (tretji pogoj), potem se člen 1(3) navedene uredbe lahko spremeni tako, da se novim proizvajalcem izvoznikom dodeli stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec, to je 7,6 %.
The original Regulation has been amended three times, by Council Regulation (EC) No 2143/2004 [3], Council Regulation (EC) No 122/2006 [4] and Council Regulation (EC) No 1840/2006.
Prvotna uredba je bila trikrat spremenjena, in sicer z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2143/2004 [3], Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 122/2006 [4] in Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1840/2006.
All three Regulations have added to the Annex the names of companies exporting the product concerned, which met the criteria set out in the original Regulation.
V vseh teh treh uredbah so v prilogo dodana imena družb, ki izvažajo zadevni izdelek in so izpolnile merila iz prvotne uredbe.
NEW EXPORTER/PRODUCER REQUESTS
ZAHTEVKI NOVIH IZVOZNIKOV/PROIZVAJALCEV
Twenty Indian companies applied to be granted the same status as the companies cooperating in the original investigation not included in the sample (newcomer status) since the publication of the previous amending Regulation.
Dvajset indijskih družb je po objavi predhodne uredbe o spremembi vložilo zahtevek za odobritev istega statusa, kot ga imajo družbe, ki so sodelovale v preiskavi, vendar niso bile vključene v vzorec („status novinca“).
The 20 applicants were:
Teh 20 vložnikov je:
Applicant company
Vložnik
Eleven companies did not reply to the questionnaire intended to verify whether they met the conditions set out in Article 2 of the original Regulation and their requests therefore had to be rejected.
Enajst družb ni izpolnilo vprašalnika, s katerim naj bi se preverilo, ali izpolnjujejo pogoje iz člena 2 prvotne uredbe, zato je bilo treba njihove zahtevke zavrniti.
The remaining nine companies submitted complete replies to the questionnaire and were therefore considered for newcomer status.
Preostalih devet družb je predložilo v celoti izpolnjene vprašalnike, zato so bile njihove vloge za status novinca obravnavane.
The evidence provided by two of the abovementioned Indian exporting/producers is considered sufficient to show that they fulfil the criteria set out in the original Regulation and therefore to grant them the rate of duty applicable to the cooperating companies not included in the sample (i.e. 7,6 %) and consequently to add them to the list of exporting producers in the Annex to the original Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2143/2004, Regulation (EC) No 122/2006 and Regulation (EC) No 1840/2006.
Dokazi o izpolnjevanju pogojev iz prvotne uredbe, ki sta jih priskrbela dva od zgoraj navedenih indijskih izvoznikov/proizvajalcev, se štejejo za zadostne, zato se jima odobri stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec (tj. 7,6 %), in se ju doda na seznam izvoznikov proizvajalcev v Prilogi k prvotni uredbi, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 2143/2004, Uredbo (ES) št. 122/2006 in Uredbo (ES) št. 1840/2006.
The remaining seven companies had their applications for new exporting producer status rejected for the following reasons.
Vloge za status novega proizvajalca izvoznika za preostalih sedem družb so bile zavrnjene iz naslednjih razlogov.
Two companies failed to provide evidence that they had exported the product concerned to the Community after the investigation period or that they had irrevocable contractual obligations to export the product concerned in significant quantities to the Community.
Dve družbi nista zagotovili dokazov, da sta zadevni izdelek izvažali v Skupnost po obdobju preiskave ali da sta prevzeli nepreklicno pogodbeno obveznost, da izvozita znatne količine zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost.
Thus they did not fulfil the third criterion.
Zato ne izpolnjujeta tretjega pogoja.
One company failed to provide the sales ledger for the period considered and was thus unable to show that it had not exported the product concerned during the investigation period.
Ena družba ni zagotovila glavne knjige prodaje za zadevno obdobje in zato ni mogla dokazati, da med obdobjem preiskave ni izvažala zadevnih izdelkov.
Another company was found to have exported the product concerned during the investigation period.
Za drugo družbo je bilo ugotovljeno, da je izvažala zadevni izdelek med obdobjem preiskave.
These companies therefore did not fulfil the first criterion.
Ti družbi zato nista izpolnili prvega pogoja.
One company sent the reply to the questionnaire after the deadline and crucial documents were missing from the application.
Ena družba je izpolnjeni vprašalnik poslala po izteku roka, poleg tega pa so v vlogi manjkali ključni dokumenti.
One other company did not reply to a deficiency letter requesting more information.
Druga družba ni odgovorila na pismo o pomanjkljivostih, v katerem je zahtevanih več informacij.
These two companies had thus not provided sufficient evidence to show that they fulfilled the criteria set out in the original Regulation.
Ti dve družbi tako nista zagotovili zadostnih dokazov, da izpolnjujeta pogoje iz prvotne uredbe.
Finally, one company was found to be related to one that was named in the original Regulation and its application for newcomer status was therefore rejected as it failed the second criterion.
Za eno družbo je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila povezana z družbo, ki je bila navedena v prvotni uredbi, in je bila zato njena vloga za status novinca zavrnjena, ker ni izpolnjevala drugega pogoja.
Companies for which newcomer status was not granted were informed of the reasons for this decision and given an opportunity to make their views known in writing.
Družbe, ki jim status novinca ni bil odobren, so bile obveščene o razlogih za to odločitev in dana jim je bila možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča.
The following companies shall be added to the list of producers from India listed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 74/2004:
Naslednje družbe se dodajo na seznam proizvajalcev iz Indije iz Priloge k Uredbi (ES) št. 74/2004:
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1840/2006 (OJ L 355, 15.12.2006, p. 4).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1840/2006 (UL L 355, 15.12.2006, str. 4).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 814/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 814/2008
This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 August 2008.
Ta uredba začne veljati 15. avgusta 2008.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 815/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 815/2008
on a derogation from Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 in respect of the definition of the concept of originating products used for the purposes of the scheme of generalised preferences to take account of the special situation of Cape Verde regarding exports of certain fisheries products to the Community
o odstopanju od Uredbe (EGS) št. 2454/93 glede opredelitve pojma „izdelek s poreklom“, ki se uporablja za splošno shemo preferencialov, z namenom, da se upošteva posebni položaj Zelenortskih otokov glede izvoza nekaterih ribiških proizvodov v Skupnost
By Council Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 of 27 June 2005 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences [3], the Community granted generalised tariff preferences to Cape Verde.
Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 980/2005 z dne 27. junija 2005 o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov [3] je Skupnost Zelenortskim otokom podelila splošne tarifne preferenciale.
Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 establishes the definition of the concept of originating products to be used for the purposes of the scheme of generalised tariff preferences (GSP).
Uredba (EGS) št. 2454/93 uvaja opredelitev pojma „izdelek s poreklom“, ki se uporablja za namene sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov (GSP).
Article 76 of that Regulation provides for derogations from that definition in favour of least-developed beneficiary countries benefiting from the GSP which submit an appropriate request to that effect to the Community.
Člen 76 navedene uredbe predvideva odstopanje od navedene opredelitve v prid najmanj razvitih držav uporabnic splošnega sistema preferencialov, ki Skupnosti za ta namen predložijo ustrezen zahtevek.
From 1 March 2005 Cape Verde benefited from Decision No 2/2005 of the ACP-EC Customs Cooperation Committee of 1 March 2005 derogating from the concept of ‘originating products’ to take account of the special situation of the ACP States regarding the production of preserved tuna and of tuna loins (HS heading ex1604) [4].
Zelenortski otoki so od 1. marca 2005 deležni koristi iz Sklepa št. 2/2005 Odbora za carinsko sodelovanje AKP-ES z dne 1. marca 2005 o odstopanju od pojma „izdelki s poreklom“ zaradi upoštevanja posebnega položaja držav AKP glede proizvodnje konzerviranih tunov in filetov tuna (številka HS ex1604) [4].
However, these arrangements ceased to apply after 31 December 2007 and Cape Verde has not yet concluded an Economic Partnership Agreement with the Community.
Vendar se te ureditve po 31. decembru 2007 ne uporabljajo več, Zelenortski otoki pa še niso sklenili sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu s Skupnostjo.
Consequently, the only preferential trade arrangement available to Cape Verde since 1 January 2008 is the GSP.
Zato je GSP edini preferencialni trgovinski sporazum, ki ga imajo Zelenortski otoki na razpolago od 1. januarja 2008.
By letter dated 27 November 2007 Cape Verde submitted a request for a derogation from GSP rules of origin in accordance with Article 76 of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93.
Z dopisom z dne 27. novembra 2007 so Zelenortski otoki predložili zahtevek za odstopanje od pravil o poreklu za namene GSP v skladu s členom 76 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2454/93.
By letter dated 27 February 2008, it submitted complementary information in support of this request.
Z dopisom z dne 27. februarja 2008 so v podporo temu zahtevku predložili dodatne informacije.
The derogation request concerns a total annual quantity of 1561 tonnes of three species of prepared or preserved fish, two of which were not covered by the derogation granted by Decision No 2/2005: frigate tuna or frigate mackerel, mackerel and tuna.
Zahtevek o odstopanju obsega skupno letno količino 1561 ton za tri vrste pripravljenih ali konzerviranih rib, od katerih dve nista bili zajeti z odstopanjem iz Sklepa št. 2/2005: fregatni trupec ali trupec ter skuša in tun.
The derogation request has been considered by the Commission and has been found to be complete and duly substantiated.
Komisija je obravnavala predložen zahtevek o odstopanju in presodila, da je popoln in ustrezno utemeljen.
The derogation is required in order to ensure continuity of supply throughout the year and thus secure a substantial investment by a firm having already shown its commitment to supporting the development of the activity concerned in Cape Verde.
Odstopanje se zahteva, zato da podjetje, ki je že dokazalo pripravljenost podpirati razvoj navedene dejavnosti na Zelenortskih otokih, zagotovi kontinuiteto dobave skozi celo leto in tako zavaruje znatno naložbo.
This investment would not only have a direct impact on the Cape Verde fishing industry with regard to the species for which the derogation is requested, but also a substantial indirect, beneficial effect on the revitalisation of Cape Verde’s fishing fleet generally.
Ta naložba ne bi le neposredno vplivala na ribištvo Zelenortskih otokov v zvezi z vrstami, za katere je podan zahtevek, ampak bi imela tudi velik posreden učinek, ki bi na splošno ugodno vplival na oživitev ribiške flote Zelenortskih otokov.
With more Cape Verde vessels being operational, the ability to supply originating fish would gradually increase.
Ker bo na Zelenortskih otokih v uporabi več plovil, bo možnost dobave rib s poreklom postopoma narasla.
The derogation should be sufficiently long to ensure the investment and general predictability for operators, but it may not in any event go beyond 31 December 2010, when Cape Verde will no longer benefit from the special arrangement for least developed countries within GSP.
Odstopanje mora trajati dovolj dolgo, da upraviči naložbo in splošno predvidljivost za operaterje, vendar v nobenem primeru ne dlje od 31. decembra 2010, ko Zelenortski otoki ne bodo več upravičeni do posebne ureditve za najmanj razvite države znotraj sheme GSP.
After that the viability of the Cape Verde canning industry should be ensured within the framework of an Economic Partnership Agreement.
Po tem bo treba obstoj konzervne industrije Zelenortskih otokov zagotoviti v okviru sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu.
Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 lays down rules relating to the management of tariff quotas.
Uredba (EGS) št. 2454/93 določa pravila v zvezi z upravljanjem tarifnih kvot.
In order to ensure efficient management carried out in close cooperation between the authorities of Cape Verde, the customs authorities of the Community and the Commission, those rules should apply mutatis mutandis to the quantities imported under the derogation granted by this Regulation.
Zaradi učinkovitega upravljanja, ki ga v tesnem sodelovanju izvajajo organi z Zelenortskih otokov, carinski organi Skupnosti in Komisija, bi se morala pravila smiselno uporabljati za količine, uvožene v skladu z odstopanjem, ki je odobreno s to uredbo.
In order to allow more efficient monitoring of the operation of the derogation, the authorities of Cape Verde should communicate regularly to the Commission details of certificates of origin issued.
Zaradi učinkovitejšega spremljanja izvajanja odstopanja morajo organi Zelenortskih otokov Skupnosti redno sporočati podrobnosti o izdanih potrdilih o poreklu.
In their request, the authorities of Cape Verde indicated that the firm concerned would probably not have the production capacity to use the whole amount of the quotas requested in the first year of operation after the investment was made.
Organi Zelenortskih otokov so v zahtevku navedli, da navedeno podjetje verjetno ne bo imelo proizvodne zmogljivosti, da bi uporabilo vse kvote, ki se zahtevajo v prvem letu delovanja po naložbi.
Consequently, while the requested quantities should be granted in full for the years 2009 and 2010, the quotas should be reduced pro rata for the period in which the derogation will apply in the year 2008.
Zato morajo biti zahtevane količine za leti 2009 in 2010 dodeljene v celoti, kvote v letu 2008 pa sorazmerno manjše za obdobje, v katerem bo veljalo odstopanje.
By way of derogation from Articles 67 to 97 of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93, prepared or preserved mackerel, frigate tuna and frigate mackerel and tuna of CN codes ex160415, ex160419 and ex160414 produced in Cape Verde from non-originating fish shall be regarded as originating in Cape Verde in accordance with the arrangements set out in Articles 2, 3 and 4.
Z odstopanjem od členov 67 do 97 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2454/93 se pripravljene ali konzervirane skuše, fregatni trupec, trupec ter tuna s tarifnimi oznakami KN ex160415, ex160419 in ex160414, ki so bili proizvedeni na Zelenortskih otokih iz rib brez porekla, obravnavajo kot ribe s poreklom z Zelenortskih otokov v skladu z ureditvami iz členov 2, 3 in 4.
The derogation provided for in Article 1 shall apply to products transported directly from Cape Verde and imported into the Community during the period from 1 September 2008 until 31 December 2010, up to the annual quantities listed in the Annex against each product.
Odstopanje od člena 1 velja za proizvode, prepeljane neposredno z Zelenortskih otokov in uvožene v Skupnost v obdobju od 1. septembra 2008 do 31. decembra 2010, do višine v Prilogi navedenih letnih količin za vsak proizvod.
The customs authorities of Cape Verde shall take the necessary steps to carry out quantitative checks on exports of the products referred to in Article 1.
Carinski organi Zelenortskih otokov sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za izvajanje količinskih pregledov pri izvozu proizvodov iz člena 1.
The following shall be entered in box 4 of certificates of origin form A issued by the competent authorities of Cape Verde pursuant to this Regulation: ‘Derogation — Regulation (EC) No 815/2008’.
Na potrdilo o poreklu Obrazec A, ki ga v skladu s to uredbo izdajo pristojni organi Zelenortskih otokov, se v polje 4 vpiše: „Derogation – Regulation (EC) No. 815/2008“.