natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Since all export sales of BRC to the Community were made via related importers, the ex-works export price had to be constructed in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, on the basis of the price at which the imported products were first resold to the first independent buyer in the Community, adjusted for all costs incurred between importation and resale, as well as a reasonable margin for SG&A and for profits.
Celotni izvoz BRC v Skupnost je potekal prek povezanih uvoznikov, zato je morala biti izvozna cena franko tovarna konstruirana v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe na podlagi cene, po kateri so bili uvoženi izdelki prvič prodani naprej prvemu neodvisnemu kupcu v Skupnosti, pri čemer je bila cena ustrezno prilagojena za vse stroške, nastale med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo ter za razumne zneske za PSA-stroške ter dobičke.
In this regard the SG&A costs of the related importers were used.
Glede na to so bili uporabljeni PSA-stroški povezanih uvoznikov.
As regards a reasonable importer’s profit to be used for this purpose, in the absence of data from unrelated importers, since the current interim review is limited to the examination of dumping in relation to one company, i.e. the applicant, the profit margin was based on the profit achieved by a cooperating unrelated importer from the original investigation.
Kar zadeva razumen dobiček uvoznika, ki ga je treba zato uporabiti, je ob odsotnosti podatkov od nepovezanih uvoznikov in dejstvu, da je sedanji vmesni pregled omejen na preiskavo dampinga v zvezi z eno družbo, tj. vložnikom, stopnja dobička temeljila na dobičku sodelujočega nepovezanega uvoznika iz prvotne preiskave.
The average normal value and the average export price for each type of the product concerned were compared on an ex-works basis and at the same level of trade and at the same level of indirect taxation.
Za vsako vrsto zadevnega izdelka sta se primerjali povprečna normalna vrednost in povprečna izvozna cena na podlagi franko tovarna in pri enakem obsegu trgovine ter isti ravni posredne obdavčitve.
In order to ensure a fair comparison between normal value and export price, account was taken, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, of differences in factors which were claimed and demonstrated to affect prices and price comparability.
Zaradi poštene primerjave so se v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe upoštevale razlike v dejavnikih, ki so dokazano vplivali na cene in primerljivost cen.
For this purpose, adjustments for transport costs, insurance, handling charges, credit costs, and actual anti-dumping duties paid were made where applicable and justified.
Zato so bile po potrebi in kadar je bilo upravičeno narejene prilagoditve za stroške prevoza, zavarovanje, manipulativne stroške, stroške kredita in dejansko plačane protidampinške dajatve.
The investigation has established that the VAT paid on export sales was not refunded.
S preiskavo je bilo ugotovljeno, da DDV, plačan pri izvozu, ni bil povrnjen.
In the disclosure which was provided to the applicant pursuant to Article 20 of the basic Regulation, it was therefore indicated that both the export price and the normal value would be established on a VAT paid or payable basis.
V razkritju, ki je bilo predloženo vložniku v skladu s členom 20 osnovne uredbe, je bilo zato navedeno, da bosta tako izvozna cena kot normalna vrednost določeni na podlagi DDV, ki je bil plačan ali se plačuje.
The applicant argued that this approach is not acceptable as it would increase the normal value by an amount exceeding the VAT amount which should have been deducted from the export price.
Vložnik je trdil, da tak pristop ni sprejemljiv, ker bi se normalna vrednost tako zvišala za vrednost nad zneskom z DDV, ki bi moral biti odštet od izvozne cene.
Regarding this argument, it should be noted that during the review investigation period no VAT on export sales was refunded.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da med obdobjem preiskave v zvezi s pregledom DDV na izvoz ni bil povrnjen.
Therefore, no adjustment in respect of VAT, neither to the export price nor to normal value, was necessary.
Zato ni bila potrebna prilagoditev v zvezi z DDV, niti izvozne cene niti normalne vrednosti.
In addition, the method used is neutral.
Poleg tega je uporabljena metoda nevtralna.
Indeed it has the same effect, also if, for instance for certain products or transactions, a company sells to the Community at an export price which does not result in dumping.
Dejansko bi bil dosežen isti učinek tudi, če bi bili na primer nekateri izdelki ali transakcije družbe prodani v Skupnost po izvozni ceni, ki ne bi pomenila dampinga.
In other words, even assuming that the inclusion of VAT on both sides of the equation would increase the difference between the two elements, which would also be the case for those models for which there was no dumping.
Z drugimi besedami, tudi če bi predpostavili, da bi vključitev DDV na obeh straneh enačbe povečala razliko med tema dvema elementoma, bi to veljalo tudi za tiste primere, pri katerih dampinga ni bilo.
This comparison showed no existence of dumping.
Ta primerjava ni pokazala dampinga.
In accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, it was also examined whether the changed circumstances could reasonably be considered to be of a lasting nature.
V skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe se je proučilo tudi, ali se spremenjene okoliščine lahko štejejo za trajne.
In this respect it is recalled that the applicant only sold a limited quantity of magnesia bricks at the end of the IP of the original Regulation and thus did not participate in the original investigation, therefore a residual duty of 39,9 % was applied to it.
S tem v zvezi se opominja, da je vložnik na koncu OP prvotne uredbe prodal le omejeno količino magnezitnih opek in zato ni sodeloval v prvotni preiskavi, zato je zanj veljala preostala dajatev v višini 39,9 %.
Subsequently, BRC which existed during the original investigation was purchased by the Vesuvius Group and it resulted in changes in the corporate structure of BRC.
Nato je BRC, ki je obstajala med prvotno preiskavo, kupila skupina Vesuvius Group, kar je povzročilo spremembe v podjetniški strukturi BRC.
The applicant provided full cooperation in this interim review and the data collected and verified allowed to establish a dumping margin based on its individual export prices to the Community.
Vložnik je v tem vmesnem pregledu v celoti sodeloval in z zbranimi in preverjenimi podatki je bilo mogoče določiti stopnjo dampinga na podlagi njegovih posameznih izvoznih cen v Skupnosti.
The result of this calculation indicates that the continued application of the measure at its current level is no longer justified.
Iz tega izračuna je razvidno, da nadaljevanje ukrepa na sedanji ravni ni več upravičeno.
Evidence obtained and verified during the investigation also showed that the changes in the applicant’s corporate structure are to be considered lasting.
Dokazi, ki so bili poslani in preverjeni med preiskavo, so pokazali tudi, da je treba spremembe v podjetniški strukturi vložnika šteti za trajne.
No element emerged in the course of the investigation that would suggest otherwise.
Med preiskavo se ni pojavilo nič, kar bi temu nasprotovalo.
The circumstances that led to the initiation of this interim review are unlikely to change in the foreseeable future in a manner that would affect the findings of the current review.
Okoliščine, ki so privedle do začetka tega vmesnega pregleda, se v bližnji prihodnosti po vsej verjetnosti ne bodo toliko spremenile, da bi vplivale na ugotovitve iz sedanjega pregleda.
Therefore it is concluded that the changed circumstances are considered to be of a lasting nature.
Zato se sklene, da so spremenjene okoliščine trajne.
In the light of the results of this review investigation, it is considered appropriate to amend the anti-dumping duty applicable to imports of the product concerned from BRC to 0 %.
Glede na rezultate te preiskave v zvezi s pregledom se zdi primerno, da se protidampinška dajatev, ki se uporablja za uvoz zadevnega izdelka družbe BRC, spremeni na 0 %.
Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend an amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1659/2005 and were given an opportunity to comment.
Zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti sprememba Uredbe (ES) št. 1659/2005, in dana jim je bila možnost, da izrazijo pripombe.
The comments were taken into account where appropriate,
Pripombe so bile upoštevane, kjer je bilo ustrezno –
In the table in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1659/2005 the following entry shall be inserted after the entry concerning Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Materials Co. Ltd.
V preglednici iz člena 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1659/2005 se za vnosom v zvezi z Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Materials Co.Ltd vstavi naslednje:
Yingkou 115007, Liaoning Province, PRC
Yingkou 115007, Liaoning Province, LRK
OJ C 146, 12.6.2008, p. 27.
UL C 146, 12.6.2008, str. 27.
Council Regulation (EC) No 826/2009
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 826/2009
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (basic Regulation), and in particular Article 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dumpinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), in zlasti člena 11(3) Uredbe,
Measures in force
Obstoječi ukrepi
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1659/2005 [2] (original Regulation), imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain magnesia bricks originating in the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 1659/2005 [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prvotna uredba) uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz določenih vrst magnezitne opeke s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (v nadaljnjem besedilu: LRK).
In 2008, the Commission received a request for a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation (interim review).
Komisija je leta 2008 prejela zahtevek za delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vmesni pregled).
The request, limited in scope to the examination of dumping, was lodged by a Chinese exporting producer, Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Materials Company Limited (DSRM or the applicant).
Zahtevek, po obsegu omejen na proučitev dampinga, je vložil kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Materials Company Limited (v nadaljnjem besedilu: DSRM ali vložnik).
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to products manufactured by DSRM is 27,7 %.
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve za izdelke, ki jih proizvaja DSRM, je 27,7 %.
In its request for the interim review the applicant claimed that the circumstances on the basis of which the measure was imposed had changed and that these changes were of a lasting nature.
V zahtevku za vmesni pregled je vložnik trdil, da so se okoliščine, na podlagi katerih so bili uvedeni ukrepi, spremenile in da so te spremembe trajne.
The applicant argued that a comparison of its domestic prices and cost of production and export prices to the Community indicates that the dumping margin is substantially lower than the current level of measure.
Trdil je, da primerjava njegovih domačih cen in stroškov proizvodnje z izvoznimi cenami v Skupnost kaže, da je stopnja dampinga bistveno nižja od trenutne ravni ukrepa.
Therefore, it claimed that the continued application of the measure at its current level would no longer be necessary to offset dumping.
Zato naj nadaljevanje ukrepa na sedanji ravni za izravnavanje dampinga ne bi bilo več potrebno.
In particular, the applicant provided prima facie evidence showing that it meets the criteria for market economy treatment (MET).
Vložnik je zlasti predložil prima facie dokaze, da izpolnjuje merila za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: TGO).
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an interim review, the Commission decided to initiate an interim review in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, limited in scope to the examination of dumping as far as DSRM is concerned.
Po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom je Komisija ugotovila, da obstaja dovolj dokazov, ki upravičujejo začetek vmesnega pregleda, zato je sklenila začeti vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe, omejen na proučitev dampinga v zvezi z DSRM.
The product concerned by the interim review is the same as that described in the original Regulation, i.e. chemically bonded, unfired magnesia bricks, the magnesia component of which contains at least 80 % MgO, whether or not containing magnesite, originating in the PRC (product concerned), currently falling within CN codes ex68159100, ex68159910 and ex68159990 (TARIC codes 6815910010, 6815991020 and 6815999020).
Zadevni izdelek vmesnega pregleda je isti kot v prvotni uredbi, tj. kemijsko vezane, nežgane magnezitne opeke, katerih magnezijeva sestavina vsebuje vsaj 80 % MgO, ki vsebujejo magnezit ali ne, s poreklom iz LRK (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevni izdelek), trenutno uvrščen pod oznake KN ex68159100, ex68159910 in ex68159990 (oznake TARIC 6815910010, 6815991020 in 6815999020).
The product produced and sold on the Chinese domestic market and that exported to the Community, as well as that produced and sold in the USA have the same basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics and uses, and are therefore considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Izdelek, proizveden in prodan na kitajskem domačem trgu, ter tisti, ki se izvaža v Skupnost, kakor tudi tisti, ki se proizvaja in prodaja v ZDA, imajo enake osnovne fizikalne, tehnične in kemijske lastnosti ter uporabo, zato se štejejo za podobne v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission officially advised the Community industry, the applicant and the authorities of the exporting country of the initiation of the interim review.
Komisija je industrijo Skupnosti, vložnika in predstavnike države izvoznice uradno obvestila o začetku vmesnega pregleda.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time-limit set out in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane stranke so imele možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo Komisijo za zaslišanje v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
A market economy treatment (MET) claim form and a questionnaire were sent to DSRM and its related companies, all of which replied within the deadlines set for that purpose.
Družbi DSRM in njenim povezanim družbam sta bila poslana obrazec zahtevka za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo (TGO) in vprašalnik in vse so odgovore poslale v predvidenih rokih.
Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Materials Co. Limited (the applicant), Dashiqiao, Liaoning Province,
Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Materials Co. Limited (vložnik), Dashiqiao, Liaoning Province
The investigation of dumping covered the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 March 2008 (investigation period or IP).
Obdobje preiskave dampinga je zajelo obdobje od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. marca 2008 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje preiskave ali OP).
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports from the PRC, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs (1) to (6) of the said Article for those producers which were found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, i.e. where it is shown that market economy conditions prevail in respect of the manufacture and sale of the like product.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe se normalna vrednost v protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom iz LRK določi v skladu z odstavki 1 do 6 člena 2 osnovne uredbe za tiste proizvajalce, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, tj. kjer se izkaže, da pri proizvodnji in prodaji podobnega izdelka prevladujejo pogoji tržnega gospodarstva.
firms have one clear set of basic accounting records which are independently audited in line with International Accounting Standards (IAS) and applied for all purposes,
družbe imajo en jasen sklop osnovnih računovodskih evidenc, ki se neodvisno pregledujejo v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi (v nadaljnjem besedilu: MRS) in se uporabljajo za vse namene,
The information and data presented therein was subsequently subject to an on-spot investigation.
Informacije in podatki iz zahtevka so bili nato preverjeni s preiskavo na kraju samem.
The investigation found that the applicant met all five MET criteria.
S preiskavo je bilo ugotovljeno, da vložnik izpolnjuje vseh pet meril za TGO.
It was found that during the IP, DSRM made its business decisions without any State interference or distortions related to non-market economy conditions.
Med OP je bilo ugotovljeno, da pri poslovnih odločitvah DSRM ni bilo vmešavanja države ali izkrivljanja zaradi razmer netržnega gospodarstva.
DSRM is subject to Chinese bankruptcy and property laws without any derogation.
Za DSRM velja kitajsko stečajno pravo in pravo lastninskih razmerij brez kakršnih koli odstopanj.
The company has one set of independently audited accounting records and accounting system and its practice was found to be in line with internationally accepted general accounting principles and IAS.
Družba ima en jasen sklop računovodskih evidenc, ki se neodvisno pregledujejo, in ustrezen računovodski sistem; ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da je njena praksa v skladu s splošno sprejetimi računovodskimi načeli in MRS.
Costs and prices were found to reflect market values and exchange rate conversions were carried out at market rates.
Stroški in cene odražajo tržne vrednosti in pretvorbe valut se opravljajo po tržnih menjalnih tečajih.
Based on the above facts and considerations, the applicant could be granted MET.
Na podlagi zgornjih dejstev in premislekov se vložniku lahko odobri TGO.
The Community industry, the applicant and the authorities of the exporting country were given an opportunity to comment on the findings concerning MET.
Industrija Skupnosti, vložnik in organi države izvoznice so imeli možnost predložiti pripombe k ugotovitvam v zvezi s TGO.
The Community industry argued that the applicant failed on criterion one because the various export restrictions imposed by the Chinese Government on the main raw material to produce the product concerned led to distorted prices of that raw material on the domestic market.
Industrija Skupnosti je trdila, da vložnik ni izpolnil prvega merila, ker so razne izvozne omejitve, ki jih je kitajska vlada uvedla na glavno surovino za proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka, privedle do izkrivljenih cen surovine na domačem trgu.
As a result, the Chinese producers of magnesia bricks can obtain the raw material at better conditions compared to their competitors in other countries.
Zato so kitajski proizvajalci magnezitnih opek v primerjavi s konkurenti v drugih državah surovino lahko pridobivali po boljših pogojih.
For the investigation of this claim the purchase prices of the main raw material, i.e. magnesia, by DSRM and the publicly quoted prices for Chinese magnesia (source: Price Watch/Industrial minerals) provided by the Community industry were examined.
Za proučitev te trditve so bile preverjene nabavne cene DSRM za glavno surovino, tj. magnezijev oksid, in javno kotirane cene kitajskega magnezijevega oksida (vir: Price Watch/Industrial minerals), ki jih je zagotovila industrija Skupnosti.
Moreover, it could be verified during the investigation that DSRM was free to purchase magnesia from various suppliers, and that prices were negotiated without any State interference.
Poleg tega je bilo med preiskavo ugotovljeno, da je DSRM lahko magnezijev oksid prosto kupoval od različnih dobaviteljev in da so se cene določale brez vmešavanja države.
On that basis, it appears that any distortions concerning raw material prices did not have any significant impact on this specific company during the IP.
Na podlagi tega je očitno, da kakršno koli izkrivljanje cen surovine na to podjetje v OP ni bistveno vplivalo.
On the basis of the above, the findings and the conclusion that MET should be granted to DSRM are confirmed.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega se potrdijo ugotovitve in sklep, da se TGO družbi DSRM odobri.
For the determination of normal value it was first established whether DSRM’s total volume of domestic sales of the like product was representative in comparison with its total volume of export sales to the Community.
Za določanje normalne vrednosti se je najprej ugotavljalo, ali je bila skupna domača prodaja zadevnega izdelka družbe DSRM reprezentativna v primerjavi z njenim celotnim obsegom izvoza v Skupnost.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, domestic sales are considered representative when the total domestic sales volume is at least 5 % of the total volume of corresponding export sales to the Community.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe se domača prodaja šteje za reprezentativno, če predstavlja celotni obseg domače prodaje vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega ustreznega izvoza v Skupnost.
It was found that all sales by DSRM on the domestic market were sold in representative volumes.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bila količina celotne prodaje DSRM na domačem trgu reprezentativna.
Subsequently, those types of the like product sold on the domestic market by DSRM that were identical and directly comparable to the types sold for export to the Community, were identified.
Nato so bile opredeljene vrste podobnega izdelka, ki jih je na domačem trgu prodajal DSRM in so bile enake ali neposredno primerljive z vrstami, prodanimi za izvoz v Skupnost.
For each type sold by DSRM on the domestic market and found to be directly comparable with the type sold for export to the Community, it was established whether domestic sales were sold in representative volume for the purposes of Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Za vsako vrsto, ki jo je DSRM prodal na svojem domačem trgu in za katero je bilo ugotovljeno, da je neposredno primerljiva z vrsto, prodano za izvoz v Skupnost, je bilo ugotovljeno, ali je bila domača prodaja zadostno reprezentativna za namene člena 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
Domestic sales of a particular type were considered sufficiently representative when the total domestic sales volume of that type during the IP represented 5 % or more of the total sales volume of the comparable type exported to the Community.
Domača prodaja določene vrste izdelka se je štela za dovolj reprezentativno, če je celotni obseg domače prodaje te vrste v OP predstavljal 5 % ali več celotnega obsega prodaje primerljive vrste, izvožene v Skupnost.
It was also examined whether the domestic sales of each type could be regarded as having been made in the ordinary course of trade, pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Preverjeno je bilo tudi, ali se lahko domača prodaja vsake vrste izdelka šteje za običajni potek trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
This was done by establishing the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market of each exported type of the product concerned during the IP.
To je bilo izvedeno tako, da se je pri vsaki izvoženi vrsti izdelka določil delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu med OP.
Where the sales volume of a product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of that type, and where the weighted average price of that type was equal to or above the unit cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price.
Če je obseg prodaje vrste izdelka, prodanega po neto prodajni ceni, enaki ali višji od stroškov proizvodnje, predstavljal več kot 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje navedene vrste in če je bila tehtana povprečna cena navedene vrste enaka ali višja od stroškov proizvodnje na enoto, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni.