natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The first two steps envisaged by Uruguayan authorities were implemented within the agreed deadlines, but the change of the IMESI structure was delayed until 2007, when, with the Decree No 520/2007 of 27 December 2007, Uruguay introduced a new legislation on its excise taxes.
Prva dva koraka, ki so ju predvideli urugvajski organi, sta bila izvedena v določenih rokih, sprememba strukture IMESI pa je bila odložena do leta 2007, ko je Urugvaj z Odlokom št. 520/2007 z dne 27. decembra 2007 uvedel novo zakonodajo o trošarinah.
In view of the above analysis, it is considered that the examination procedure has led to a satisfactory situation with regard to the obstacles that faced the trade as alleged in the complaint lodged by SWA.
Na podlagi zgornje analize se ugotavlja, da je preiskava privedla do zadovoljivega stanja v zvezi s trgovinskimi ovirami, kakor so bile opredeljene v pritožbi SWA.
The examination procedure should therefore be terminated in accordance with Article 11(1) of the Regulation.
Preiskavo je zato treba ustaviti v skladu s členom 11(1) Uredbe.
The examination procedure concerning measures imposed by the Eastern Republic of Uruguay affecting the importation and sale of whisky in Uruguay is hereby terminated.
Preiskava o ukrepih, ki jih je uvedla Vzhodna republika Urugvaj in vplivajo na uvoz in prodajo viskija v Urugvaju, se ustavi.
as regards the discriminatory requirement to affix strip stamps on imported whisky bottles, Uruguay committed to amend its regulations by 30 June 2005, with an entry force within 90 days;
V zvezi z diskriminatorno zahtevo za uporabo trošarinskih nalepk na uvoženih steklenicah viskija se je Urugvaj zavezal, da bo spremenil predpise do 30. junija 2005 in ti bodo začeli veljati v roku 90 dni.
thirdly, SWA had also claimed that Uruguay’s internal tax arrangements for spirits are in breach of GATT insofar as they are not administered in a uniform, impartial and reasonable manner.
SWA je tudi trdil, da urugvajska notranja davčna ureditev za žgane pijače krši pravila GATT, kolikor jih ne uporablja usklajeno, nepristransko in razumno.
In early 2008 the Commission requested Uruguay a number of clarifications as regards the revisions to the structure of the specific internal tax, which have been provided in May 2009.
V začetku leta 2008 je Komisija od Urugvaja zahtevala več pojasnitev v zvezi z revizijo strukture posebnega notranjega davka.
The clarifications provided by the government of Uruguay confirmed that the Uruguayan system is operating in a manner consistent with the relevant WTO obligations and Uruguay’s engagements in the settlement.
Pojasnitve, ki jih je urugvajska vlada predložila maja 2009, potrjujejo, da urugvajski sistem v tej poravnavi spora deluje v skladu z ustreznimi obveznostmi STO in zavezami Urugvaja.
repealing Directive 2009/124/EC amending Annex I to Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum levels for arsenic, theobromine, Datura sp., Ricinus communis L., Croton tiglium L. and Abrus precatorius L.
o razveljavitvi Direktive 2009/124/ES o spremembi Priloge I k Direktivi 2002/32/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o mejnih vrednostih za arzen, teobromin, Datura sp., Ricinus communis L., Croton tiglium L. in Abrus precatorius L.
(notified under document C(2009) 7705)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 7705)
Having regard to Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission [1], and in particular Article 5a thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za izvrševanje pooblastil za izvajanje, podeljenih Komisiji [1], in zlasti člena 5a Sklepa,
Having regard to Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 May 2002 on undesirable substances in animal feed [2], and in particular Article 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2002/32/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. maja 2002 o nezaželenih snoveh v živalski krmi [2] in zlasti člena 11(3) Direktive,
Article 8 of Directive 2002/32/EC provides that measures adapting Annex I to that Directive are designed to amend non-essential elements of that Directive and are therefore to be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 11(3) thereof.
Člen 8 Direktive 2002/32/ES določa, da so ukrepi za prilagoditev Priloge I k navedeni direktivi namenjeni spremembi nebistvenih elementov navedene direktive in jih je zato treba sprejeti v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 11(3) Direktive.
Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC provides that the draft measures are to be submitted for scrutiny by the European Parliament and the Council and that the period for scrutiny is to be 3 months from the date of referral to them.
Člen 5a Sklepa 1999/468/ES določa, da se osnutki ukrepov predložijo v pregled Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ter da je obdobje za pregled tri mesece od predložitve.
The draft Commission Directive amending Annex I to Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum levels for arsenic, theobromine, Datura sp., Ricinus communis L., Croton tiglium L. and Abrus precatorius L. was referred to the European Parliament and the Council on 28 July 2009.
Osnutek direktive o spremembi Priloge I k Direktivi 2002/32/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o mejnih vrednostih za arzen, teobromin, Datura sp., Ricinus communis L., Croton tiglium L. in Abrus precatorius L. je bil Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predložen 28. julija 2009.
Commission Directive 2009/124/EC of 25 September 2009 amending Annex I to Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum levels for arsenic, theobromine, Datura sp., Ricinus communis L., Croton tiglium L. and Abrus precatorius L. [3] was erroneously adopted before the expiry of the scrutiny period.
Direktiva Komisije 2009/124/ES z dne 25. septembra 2009 o spremembi Priloge I k Direktivi 2002/32/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o mejnih vrednostih za arzen, teobromin, Datura sp., Ricinus communis L., Croton tiglium L. in Abrus precatorius L. [3] je bila pomotoma sprejeta pred iztekom obdobja za pregled.
It is therefore appropriate to repeal Directive 2009/124/EC without delay,
Zato je primerno, da se Direktiva 2009/124/ES nemudoma razveljavi –
Directive 2009/124/EC is repealed.
Direktiva 2009/124/ES se razveljavi.
OJ L 254, 26.9.2009, p. 100.
UL L 254, 26.9.2009, str. 100.
of 2 October 2009
z dne 2. oktobra 2009
setting out the practical arrangements for the exchange of information by electronic means between Member States under Chapter VI of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market
o določitvi praktičnih rešitev za izmenjavo informacij med državami članicami po elektronski poti v skladu s Poglavjem VI Direktive 2006/123/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o storitvah na notranjem trgu
(notified under document C(2009) 7493)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 7493)
Having regard to Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market [1], and in particular the second sentence of Article 36 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2006/123/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o storitvah na notranjem trgu [1] in zlasti drugega stavka člena 36 Direktive,
The obligation of mutual assistance and effective cooperation with one another imposed on Member States under Articles 28 to 36 of Directive 2006/123/EC entails the exchange of information between their competent authorities.
Obveznost medsebojne pomoči in učinkovitega medsebojnega sodelovanja, ki jo državam članicam nalagajo členi 28 do 36 Direktive 2006/123/ES, vključuje izmenjavo informacij med njihovimi pristojnimi organi.
In order to function properly, cooperation between Member States needs to be supported by technical means which enable direct and fast communication between their competent authorities.
Da bi sodelovanje med državami članicami potekalo dobro, mora biti podprto s tehničnimi sredstvi, ki zagotavljajo neposredno in hitro komunikacijo med njihovimi pristojnimi organi.
For this purpose, Directive 2006/123/EC, in its Article 34(1), provides that the Commission, in cooperation with Member States, shall establish an electronic system for the exchange of information between Member States, taking into account existing information systems.
V ta namen Direktiva 2006/123/ES v členu 34(1) določa, da Komisija v sodelovanju z državami članicami vzpostavi elektronski sistem za izmenjavo informacij med državami članicami, pri čemer upošteva obstoječe informacijske sisteme.
The Internal Market Information System (IMI), established pursuant to Decision 2004/387/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on the Interoperable delivery of pan-European eGovernment services to public administrations, businesses and citizens (IDABC) [2], is an electronic tool which is intended to support a number of legislative acts in the field of internal market, which require the exchange of information between Member States' administrations.
Informacijski sistem za notranji trg (IMI), uveden na podlagi Sklepa 2004/387/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o interoperabilnem zagotavljanju vseevropskih e-vladnih storitev javnim upravam, podjetjem in državljanom (IDABC) [2], je elektronski pripomoček, namenjen podpori številnih zakonodajnih aktov s področja notranjega trga, ki zahtevajo izmenjavo informacij med upravami držav članic.
Since IMI allows secure and structured exchange of information between competent authorities by electronic means and since it also enables competent authorities to identify easily the relevant interlocutor in other Member States and to communicate with each other in a fast and efficient way, it is appropriate to use IMI for the exchange of information for the purposes of Directive 2006/123/EC.
Ker IMI omogoča varno in strukturirano izmenjavo podatkov med pristojnimi organi držav članic po elektronski poti ter jim omogoča lahko prepoznavanje ustreznih sogovornikov v drugih državah članicah in hitro ter učinkovito medsebojno sporazumevanje, ga je primerno uporabiti za izmenjavo informacij za namene Direktive 2006/123/ES.
In order to make it possible for the competent authorities of the Member States to efficiently exchange information by electronic means, it is necessary to lay down practical arrangements for such an exchange through IMI.
Da bi se pristojnim organom držav članic omogočila učinkovita izmenjava informacij po elektronski poti, je treba določiti praktične rešitve za takšno izmenjavo prek IMI.
Besides requests for information and to carry out checks, inspections and investigations, as well as replies thereto, Directive 2006/123/EC provides for two specific mechanisms of information exchange: the exchange of information on serious specific acts and circumstances relating to a service activity that could cause serious damage to the health or safety of persons or to the environment (alerts), under Article 29(3) and Article 32(1) of Directive 2006/123/EC, and the exchange of information on exceptional measures relating to the safety of services (case-by-case derogations), under Article 18 and Article 35 of Directive 2006/123/EC.
Poleg zahtev za informacije in izvedbo preverjanj, pregledov in preiskav ter odgovorov na njih določa Direktiva 2006/123/ES dva posebna mehanizma za izmenjavo informacij: izmenjavo informacij o pomembnih posebnih dejanjih ali okoliščinah v zvezi s storitveno dejavnostjo, ki bi lahko resno škodile zdravju ali varnosti oseb ali okolju (opozarjanje), po členih 29(3) in 32(1) Direktive 2006/123/ES in izmenjavo informacij o izjemnih ukrepih v zvezi z varnostjo storitev (odstopanja za posamezne primere) po členih 18 in 35 Direktive 2006/123/ES.
Since alerts concern serious threats to the health or safety of persons or to the environment, close cooperation between the competent authorities in different Member States is essential to put an end to the threat concerned and to keep these authorities adequately informed on the actions taken by the other authorities, as well as on the removal or persistence of the threat.
Ker opozarjanje zadeva resne grožnje zdravju in varnosti oseb ali okolju, je tesno sodelovanje med pristojnimi organi v različnih državah članicah bistvenega pomena za odpravljanje dotične grožnje in za ustrezno obveščenost teh organov o ukrepih, ki so jih izvedli drugi orani, ter o odstranitvi oziroma nadaljnjem trajanju grožnje.
In order to ensure effective supervision by the competent authorities of the providers and the services they provide, as well as adequate protection of personal data contained in alerts, it is necessary to provide for the closure of an alert which has been opened by a Member State in accordance with Directive 2006/123/EC, when the conditions laid down in Article 29(3) and Article 32(1) are no longer met.
Da bi se pristojnim organom omogočil učinkovit nadzor ponudnikov in njihovih storitev ter da bi se zagotovilo ustrezno varstvo osebnih podatkov, vsebovanih v opozorilih, je treba določiti zaključek opozoril, ki so jih države članice odprle skladno z Direktivo 2006/123/ES, kadar pogoji iz člena 29(3) in člena 32(1) niso več izpolnjeni.
It should be made possible for Member States to object to a proposal of closing an alert where the threat of serious damage to the health or safety of persons or to the environment persists.
Državam članicam je treba omogočiti, da, kjer resne grožnje glede škodovanja zdravju ali varnosti oseb ali okolju še naprej obstajajo, ugovarjajo predlogu za zaključek opozorila.
Under Article 43 of Directive 2006/123/EC, the implementation and application of that Directive and, in particular, the provisions on supervision are to respect the rules on the protection of personal data as provided for in Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [3] and Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) [4].
Pri izvajanju in uporabi Direktive 2006/123/ES, zlasti določb o nadzoru, se mora skladno s členom 43 navedene direktive spoštovati predpise o varstvu osebnih podatkov iz Direktive 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [3] ter Direktive 2002/58/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. julija 2002 o obdelavi osebnih podatkov in varstvu zasebnosti na področju elektronskih komunikacij (Direktiva o zasebnosti in elektronskih komunikacijah) [4].
Accordingly, the exchange of information by electronic means between Member States should be carried out in accordance with the rules on the protection of personal data in Directives 95/46/EC and 2002/58/EC.
Zato se mora izmenjava informacij med državami članicami po elektronski poti izvajati skladno s predpisi o varstvu osebnih podatkov iz direktiv 95/46/ES in 2002/58/ES.
The processing of information by the Commission shall be carried out in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [5].
Komisija obdeluje informacije v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [5].
To ensure a high level of protection of personal data with regard to the operation of IMI, the Commission adopted Decision 2008/49/EC of 12 December 2007 concerning the implementation of the Internal Market Information System (IMI) as regards the protection of personal data [6] and Recommendation 2009/329/EC of 26 March 2009 on data protection guidelines for the Internal Market Information System (IMI) [7].
Da bi se v zvezi z delovanjem IMI zagotovila visoka raven varstva osebnih podatkov, je Komisija sprejela Odločbo 2008/49/ES z dne 12. decembra 2007 o izvajanju informacijskega sistema za notranji trg (IMI) v zvezi z varstvom osebnih podatkov [6] in Priporočilo 2009/329/ES z dne 26. marca 2009 o smernicah v zvezi z varstvom podatkov za informacijski sistem za notranji trg (IMI) [7].
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 40 of Directive 2006/123/EC,
Ukrepi, predvideni v tej odločbi, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 40 Direktive 2006/123/ES –
Use of IMI for the exchange of information
Uporaba IMI za izmenjavo informacij
The Internal Market Information System (IMI) shall be used for the exchange of information by electronic means between Member States for the purpose of complying with the provisions on administrative cooperation set out in Chapter VI of Directive 2006/123/EC providing for the following:
Informacijski sistem za notranji trg (IMI) se uporablja za izmenjavo informacij med državami članicami po elektronski poti za izvajanje določb o upravnem sodelovanju iz poglavja VI Direktive 2006/123/ES, ki določajo:
requests for information and to carry out checks, inspections and investigations, as well as replies thereto, under Chapter VI of Directive 2006/123/EC;
zahteve po informacijah in izvedbi preverjanj, pregledov in preiskav ter odgovorih na njih po poglavju VI Direktive 2006/123/ES;
alerts, pursuant to Article 29(3) and Article 32(1) of Directive 2006/123/EC;
opozorila, skladno s členom 29(3) in členom 32(1) Direktive 2006/123/ES;
case-by-case requests and notifications, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 35(2), (3) and (6) of Directive 2006/123/EC.
zahteve in obvestila za posamezne primere v skladu s postopkom iz člena 35(2), (3) in (6) Direktive 2006/123/ES.
IMI coordinators referred to in Article 8 of Decision 2008/49/EC may be designated as liaison points foreseen by Article 28(2) of Directive 2006/123/EC.
Kot točke za stike, predvidene v členu 28(2) Direktive 2006/123/ES, se lahko določi koordinatorje IMI iz člena 8 Odločbe 2008/49/ES.
Functions of IMI in relation to requests for information and to carry out checks, inspections and investigations, as well as replies thereto
Funkcije IMI glede zahtev za informacije in izvedbo preverjanj, pregledov in preiskav ter odgovorov na njih
For the purpose of requests for information and to carry out checks, inspections and investigations, as well as replies thereto, IMI shall provide for the following actions:
Za namene zahtev za informacije in izvedbo preverjanj, pregledov in preiskav ter odgovorov na njih zagotavlja IMI naslednje dejavnosti:
sending requests;
pošiljanje prošenj;
sending and requesting additional information;
pošiljanje dodatnih informacij in zaprošanje zanje;
accepting requests;
sprejemanje prošenj;
forwarding requests;
posredovanje prošenj;
replying to requests.
odgovarjanje na prošnje.
Functions of IMI in relation to alerts
Funkcije IMI glede opozoril
For the purpose of the exchange of information on alerts, IMI shall provide for the following actions:
Za namene izmenjave informacij o opozorilih zagotavlja IMI naslednje dejavnosti:
sending alerts when the conditions laid down in Article 29(3) and Article 32(1) of Directive 2006/123/EC are met;
pošiljanje opozoril, ko so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 29(3) in člena 32(1) Direktive 2006/123/ES;
sending and requesting additional information on alerts;
pošiljanje dodatnih informacij o opozorilih in zaprošanje za njih;
withdrawing alerts which are sent without the conditions laid down in Article 29(3) and Article 32(1) of Directive 2006/123/EC being met;
umikanje opozoril, poslanih ne da bi bili izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 29(3) in člena 32(1) Direktive 2006/123/ES;
correcting information contained in alerts;
popravljanje informacij, vsebovanih v opozorilih;
sending proposals for closure of alerts;
pošiljanje predlogov za zaključek opozoril;
objecting to proposals for closure of alerts;
ugovarjanje predlogom za zaključek opozoril;
closing alerts when the conditions laid down in Article 29(3) and Article 32(1) of Directive 2006/123/EC are no longer met.
zaključevanje opozoril, ko pogoji iz člena 29(3) in člena 32(1) Direktive 2006/123/ES niso več izpolnjeni.
For the purpose of sending alerts and related information to other Member States and of receiving alerts from other Member States, IMI shall provide for the function of alert coordinator.
Za namene pošiljanja opozoril in z njimi povezanih informacij drugim državam članicam oziroma sprejemanja opozoril s strani drugih držav članic določi IMI funkcijo koordinatorja za opozarjanje.
The function of alert coordinator may be carried out by the IMI actors provided for in Articles 7 and 8 of Decision 2008/49/EC.
Funkcijo koordinatorja za opozarjanje lahko vršijo udeleženci IMI iz členov 7 in 8 Odločbe 2008/49/ES.
Prior to erasure from the system according to the procedure laid down in Article 4 of Decision 2008/49/EC, information, including personal data, contained in an alert which has been closed shall no longer be visible to any user in IMI.
Pred izbrisom iz sistema po postopku iz člena 4 Odločbe 2008/49/ES informacije, vključno z osebnimi podatki, vsebovane v zaključenem opozorilu, niso več vidne nobenemu uporabniku IMI.
Functions of IMI in relation to the case-by-case derogation mechanism
Funkcije IMI glede mehanizma pri odstopanju za posamezne primere
For the purpose of the exchange of information on the case-by-case derogations, IMI shall provide for the following actions:
Za namene izmenjave informacij o odstopanjih za posamezne primere zagotavlja IMI naslednje dejavnosti:
sending a request to the Member State of establishment under Article 35(2) of Directive 2006/123/EC;
pošiljanje prošenj državi članici ustanovitve po členu 35(2) Direktive 2006/123/ES;
replying to a request sent under Article 35(2) of Directive 2006/123/EC;
odgovarjanje na prošnje, poslane po členu 35(2) Direktive 2006/123/ES;
sending a notification to the Commission and the Member State of establishment under Article 35(3) and Article 35(6) of Directive 2006/123/EC;
pošiljanje obvestil Komisiji in državi članici ustanovitve po členu 35(3) in členu 35(6) Direktive 2006/123/ES;
informing automatically a coordinator about the actions provided for in points (a), (b) and (c).
avtomatično obveščanje koordinatorja o dejavnostih iz točk (a), (b) in (c).
The processing of personal data for the purpose of the exchange of information by electronic means between Member States shall be carried out in accordance with Directives 95/46/EC and 2002/58/EC.
Obdelava osebnih podatkov za namene izmenjave informacij med državami članicami po elektronski poti se izvaja v skladu z direktivama 95/46/ES in 2002/58/ES.
The processing of personal data by the Commission shall be carried out in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.
Komisija obdeluje osebne podatke v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001.
Done at Brussels, 2 October 2009.
V Bruslju, 2. oktobra 2009
OJ L 100, 18.4.2009, p. 12.
UL L 100, 18.4.2009, str. 12.
granting a derogation to France pursuant to Decision 2008/477/EC on the harmonisation of the 2500-2690 MHz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services in the Community
o odobritvi odstopanja Franciji na podlagi Odločbe 2008/477/ES o uskladitvi frekvenčnega pasu 2500–2690 MHz za prizemne sisteme, ki lahko v Skupnosti zagotavljajo elektronske komunikacijske storitve
(notified under document C(2009) 7514)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 7514)