natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The derogation provided for in Article 2 shall apply to the sugar products which are imported into the Community from the Netherlands Antilles from 7 August 2009 to 31 December 2010 within the limits of the annual quantities for import of sugar for 2009 and 2010, laid down in Article 6(4) of Annex III to Decision 2001/822/EC, and for which import licenses for sugar have been allocated to the Netherlands Antilles.
Odstopanje iz člena 2 se uporablja za sladkorne izdelke, ki se iz Nizozemskih Antilov v Skupnost uvažajo od 7. avgusta 2009 do 31. decembra 2010 v okviru omejitev letnih količin za uvoz sladkorja za leti 2009 in 2010 iz člena 6(4) Priloge III k Sklepu 2001/822/ES, ter za katere so bila dodeljena uvozna dovoljenja za sladkor za Nizozemske Antile.
The customs authorities of the Netherlands Antilles shall take the necessary measures to carry out quantitative checks on exports of the products referred to in Article 2.
Carinski organi Nizozemskih Antilov sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za izvajanje količinskih pregledov pri izvozu izdelkov iz člena 2.
All the movement certificates EUR. 1 they issue in relation to those products shall bear a reference to this Decision.
Vsa potrdila o gibanju blaga EUR.1, ki jih izdajo za navedene izdelke, vsebujejo sklic na to odločbo.
The competent authorities of the Netherlands Antilles shall forward to the Commission a quarterly statement of the quantities in respect of which EUR.1 movement certificates have been issued pursuant to this Decision and the serial numbers of those certificates.
Pristojni organi Nizozemskih Antilov Komisiji vsake tri mesece pošljejo izjavo o količinah, za katere so bila v skladu s to odločbo izdana potrdila o gibanju blaga EUR.1, in serijske številke navedenih potrdil.
Box 7 of EUR 1 certificates issued under this Decision shall contain one of the following entries:
Polje 7 potrdil EUR.1, izdanih v skladu s to odločbo, vsebuje eno od naslednjih navedb:
‘Derogation — Decision 2009/699/EC’;
„Derogation — Decision 2009/699/EC“;
This Decision shall apply from 7 August 2009 until 31 December 2010.
Ta odločba se uporablja od 7. avgusta 2009 do 31. decembra 2010.
Done at Brussels, 9 September 2009.
V Bruslju, 9. septembra 2009
OJ L 11, 16.1.2003, p. 50.
UL L 11, 16.1.2003, str. 50.
Case T-101/03, Suproco v Commission ECR [2005] II-3839.
Zadeva T-101/03, Suproco proti Komisiji, ECR [2005] II-3839.
That Decision was annulled by the Court of First Instance of the European Communities, in its judgment of 22 September 2005 [3].
Sodišče prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti je v svoji sodbi 22. septembra 2005 [3] razveljavilo navedeno odločbo.
Consequently, by letter of 18 January 2006 the Commission confirmed that the request was deemed to be accepted according to the original request, thus the derogation was to end on 31 December 2007.
Posledično je Komisija z dopisom 18. januarja 2006 potrdila, da se šteje, da je bil zahtevek sprejet v skladu s prvotnim zahtevkom, zato se mora odstopanje končati 31. decembra 2007.
In that letter, the Commission requested to be kept informed by the competent authorities of the quantities imported and exported by virtue of the derogation.
V navedenem dopisu je Komisija zahtevala, da jo pristojni organi obveščajo o količinah, uvoženih in izvoženih zaradi odstopanja.
On 2 June 2009 the Netherlands requested on behalf of the Netherlands Antilles a new derogation from the rules of origin set out in Annex III to Decision 2001/822/EC for the period from 7 August 2009 until 31 December 2010.
Nizozemska je v imenu Nizozemskih Antilov 2. junija 2009 zaprosila za novo odstopanje od pravil o poreklu iz Priloge III k Sklepu 2001/822/ES za obdobje od 7. avgusta 2009 do 31. decembra 2010.
On 22 June 2009 additional information was provided by the Netherlands Antilles.
Nizozemski Antili so 22. junija 2009 predložili dodatne informacije.
Furthermore, ACP States are increasingly exporting their sugar production directly to the United States and the Community.
Poleg tega države AKP čedalje bolj izvažajo svoj sladkor neposredno v Združene države in Skupnost.
In addition the Community does not produce raw cane sugar which is used for the end product.
Hkrati pa se v Skupnosti ne proizvaja surovega trsnega sladkorja, ki se uporablja za končni izdelek.
Subject to compliance with certain conditions relating to quantities, surveillance and duration, the derogation should be granted within the limits of the annual cumulation quota provided for in Article 6(4) of Annex III, which amount to 14000 tons for 2009 and 7000 tons for 2010.
Ob upoštevanju skladnosti z nekaterimi pogoji glede količin, nadzora in trajanja, se odstopanje odobri v okviru omejitev letnih kumulacijskih kvot iz člena 6(4) Priloge III, kar znaša 14000 ton za leto 2009 in 7000 ton za leto 2010.
For 2009 derogation should be granted for 4439,024 tons of sugar for which import licences have been allocated to the Netherlands Antilles.
Za leto 2009 je treba odobriti odstopanja za 4439,024 ton sladkorja, ki so jim bila dodeljena uvozna dovoljenja za Nizozemske Antile.
of 10 September 2009
z dne 10. septembra 2009
recognising in principle the completeness of the dossier submitted for detailed examination in view of the possible inclusion of bixafen in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC
o načelnem priznavanju popolnosti dokumentacije, predložene v podroben pregled zaradi možne vključitve biksafena v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS
A dossier for the active substance bixafen was submitted by Bayer CropScience to the authorities of the United Kingdom on 8 October 2008 with an application to obtain its inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Družba Bayer CropScience je 8. oktobra 2008 organom Združenega kraljestva predložila dokumentacijo za aktivno snov biksafen z zahtevkom za njeno vključitev v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
The United Kingdom authorities have indicated to the Commission that, on preliminary examination, the dossier for the active substance concerned appears to satisfy the data and information requirements set out in Annex II to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Organi Združenega kraljestva so Komisiji sporočili, da je po predhodnem pregledu dokumentacije za navedeno aktivno snov videti, da dokumentacija izpolnjuje zahteve po podatkih in informacijah iz Priloge II k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
The rapporteur Member State shall pursue the detailed examination for the dossier referred to in Article 1 and shall communicate to the Commission the conclusions of its examination accompanied by a recommendation on the inclusion or non-inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC of the active substance referred to in Article 1 and any conditions for that inclusion as soon as possible and at the latest within a period of 1 year from the date of publication of this Decision in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Država članica poročevalka opravi podroben pregled dokumentacije iz člena 1 ter čim prej in najpozneje v enem letu po objavi te odločbe v Uradnem listu Evropske unije Komisiji sporoči sklepe pregleda in priporočilo o vključitvi ali nevključitvi aktivne snovi iz člena 1 v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS ter morebitne pogoje za navedeno vključitev.
Done at Brussels, 10 September 2009.
V Bruslju, 10. septembra 2009
8 October 2008
8. oktobra 2008
of 7 September 2009
z dne 7. septembra 2009
appointing one Dutch member and one Dutch alternate member of the Committee of the Regions
o imenovanju nizozemskega člana in nizozemskega nadomestnega člana Odbora regij
A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Co VERDAAS.
Zaradi odstopa Coja VERDAASA se je sprostilo mesto člana Odbora regij.
An alternate member’s seat has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Dick BUURSINK, alternate member of the Committee of the Regions,
Zaradi odstopa Dicka BUURSINKA se je sprostilo mesto nadomestnega člana Odbora regij –
Mr Dick BUURSINK, Gedeputeerde van de provincie Gelderland,
Dick BUURSINK, Gedeputeerde in de provincie Gelderland,
Done at Brussels, 7 September 2009.
V Bruslju, 7. septembra 2009
appointing one Austrian member of the Committee of the Regions
o imenovanju avstrijskega člana Odbora regij
A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Erwin MOHR,
Zaradi odstopa Erwina MOHRA se je sprostilo mesto člana Odbora regij –
The following is hereby reappointed to the Committee of the Regions as a member for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2010:
V Odbor regij se za preostanek mandata, tj. do 25. januarja 2010, ponovno imenuje naslednji član:
Mr Erwin MOHR, Gemeinderat in Markt Wolfurt (change of mandate).
Erwin MOHR, Gemeinderat in Markt Wolfurt (sprememba mandata)
of 11 February 2009
z dne 11. februarja 2009
concerning the State aid C 55/07 (ex NN 63/07, CP 106/06) implemented by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland — Crown guarantee to BT
o državni pomoči C 55/07 (ex NN 63/07, CP 106/06) Združenega kraljestva Velika Britanija in Severna Irska – Poroštvo države za družbo BT
(notified under document C(2009) 685)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 685)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to those provisions [1] and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi določbami [1], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
This case concerns State aid put into effect by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (hereinafter the United Kingdom) in favour of BT plc (hereinafter BT, unless otherwise stated).
Ta primer zadeva državno pomoč Združenega kraljestva Velika Britanija in Severna Irska (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Združeno kraljestvo) družbi BT plc (v nadaljnjem besedilu: BT, če ni navedeno drugače).
BT is a public limited company registered in England and Wales.
BT je delniška družba, registrirana v Angliji in Walesu.
British Telecommunications plc is a wholly owned subsidiary of BT Group plc and encompasses virtually all the businesses and assets of the BT group.
British Telecommunications plc je hčerinsko podjetje v popolni lasti družbe BT Group plc ter obsega praktično vse dejavnosti in sredstva družbe BT group plc.
PROCEDURAL ASPECTS
POSTOPKOVNI VIDIKI
On 26 April 2006, one of BT’s competitors, which requested confidentiality, lodged a complaint against a guarantee granted to BT by the Minister of the Crown (Crown guarantee).
Eden od konkurentov družbe BT, ki je zaprosil za zaupnost, je 26. aprila 2006 vložil pritožbo zoper poroštvo, ki ga je državni sekretar odobril družbi BT (v nadaljnjem besedilu: poroštvo države).
By e-mails dated 24 May 2006 and 22 June 2006, this competitor provided further information on the scheme to the Commission.
Z elektronskima dopisoma z dne 24. maja 2006 in 22. junija 2006 je navedeni konkurent Komisiji predložil dodatne informacije v zvezi s shemo.
On 18 May 2006, the Commission sent a request for information to the authorities of the United Kingdom, who replied by letter dated 18 July 2006.
Komisija je 18. maja 2006 organom Združenega kraljestva poslala prošnjo za informacije, na katero so odgovorili z dopisom z dne 18. julija 2006.
On 21 December 2006, the Commission sent a further request for information.
Komisija je 21. decembra 2006 poslala še eno prošnjo za informacije.
After an extension of the deadline, the authorities of the United Kingdom responded by letter dated 27 February 2007.
Po podaljšanju roka so organi Združenega kraljestva odgovorili z dopisom z dne 27. februarja 2007.
On 26 March 2007, a meeting was held with the lawyers representing the trustees of the BT Pension Scheme (BTPS) at the request of the United Kingdom authorities.
Na zahtevo organov Združenega kraljestva je bil 26. marca 2007 organiziran sestanek z odvetniki, ki zastopajo skrbnike pokojninske sheme BT (v nadaljnjem besedilu: BTPS).
Further information was submitted by e-mail dated 10 May 2007.
Dodatne informacije so bile predložene z elektronskim dopisom z dne 10. maja 2007.
On 10 May 2007, the Commission sent a request for information to the authorities of the United Kingdom.
Komisija je 10. maja 2007 organom Združenega kraljestva poslala prošnjo za informacije.
After an extension of the deadline and a meeting which took place on 11 June 2007, the authorities of the United Kingdom responded by letter dated 19 June 2007.
Po podaljšanju roka in sestanku, ki je potekal 11. junija 2007, so organi Združenega kraljestva odgovorili z dopisom z dne 19. junija 2007.
By letter dated 3 August 2007, the Commission requested further information.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 3. avgusta 2007 zaprosila za dodatne informacije.
After an extension of the deadline, the authorities of the United Kingdom responded by letter dated 3 October 2007.
Po podaljšanju roka so organi Združenega kraljestva odgovorili z dopisom z dne 3. oktobra 2007.
On 28 November 2007, the Commission adopted and notified to the United Kingdom a decision concluding that the Crown guarantee, as far as it concerns BT pension liabilities in case of insolvency, did not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty, and at the same opened the formal investigation procedure on certain measures linked to the Crown guarantee granted to BTPS.
Komisija je 28. novembra 2007 sprejela odločitev, da poroštvo države, kar zadeva pokojninske obveznosti BT ob plačilni nezmožnosti, ne pomeni državne pomoči v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES, o čemer je uradno obvestila Združeno kraljestvo, in hkrati sprožila formalen postopek preiskave nekaterih ukrepov, povezanih s poroštvom države, ki je bilo dodeljeno BTPS.
By e-mail dated 30 January 2008, the authorities of the United Kingdom sent their comments on that decision.
Organi Združenega kraljestva so z elektronsko pošto z dne 30. januarja 2008 predložili svoje pripombe na navedeno odločitev.
Following the publication of the decision of 28 November 2007, the Commission received comments from the following interested parties: UK Competitive Telecommunications Association (UKCTA), a trade association representing telecommunication operators competing with BT, the original anonymous complainant, BT and BTPS.
Po objavi odločitve z dne 28. novembra 2007 je Komisija prejela pripombe naslednjih zainteresiranih strani: UK Competitive Telecommunications Association (v nadaljnjem besedilu: UKCTA), trgovinskega združenja telekomunikacijskih operaterjev, ki konkurirajo družbi BT, prvotnega neimenovanega pritožnika, družbe BT in BTPS.
Their observations were sent to the authorities of the United Kingdom on 25 March 2008.
Komisija je 25. marca 2008 te pripombe poslala organom Združenega kraljestva.
By e-mail dated 25 April 2008, the authorities of the United Kingdom sought authorisation to submit the third parties’ comments to BT.
Organi Združenega kraljestva so z elektronskim dopisom z dne 25. aprila 2008 zaprosili za dovoljenje, da družbi BT predložijo pripombe tretjih strani.
After consultation and agreement of the parties concerned, the Commission authorised disclosure of non-confidential versions of these documents to BT.
Po posvetovanju z zadevnimi stranmi in njihovi privolitvi je Komisija dovolila, da se nezaupne različice teh dokumentov razkrijejo družbi BT.
By e-mail dated 30 May 2008, the Commission received the comments of the authorities of the United Kingdom on the third parties’ submissions.
Komisija je z elektronskim dopisom z dne 30. maja 2008 prejela pripombe organov Združenega kraljestva na pripombe tretjih strani.
By e-mail dated 3 June 2008, the Commission received BT’s comments on the third parties’ observations.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 3. junija 2008 prejela pripombe BT na pripombe tretjih strani.
On 22 July 2008, the Commission held a meeting with the authorities of the United Kingdom, which was followed by new clarifications provided by e-mail on 19 September 2008.
Komisija se je 22. julija 2008 sestala z organi Združenega kraljestva, čemur so sledila nova pojasnila, predložena z elektronskim dopisom z dne 19. septembra 2008.
The lawyers of BT and BTPS, at their request, met with the Commission on 6 August 2008 and 28 October 2008.
Odvetniki družbe BT in BTPS so se na svojo zahtevo sestali s Komisijo 6. avgusta 2008 in 28. oktobra 2008.
The relevant measures under examination concern the provisions by which the Government of the United Kingdom guarantees the payment of certain liabilities, in particular pension liabilities, of BT under the Crown guarantee, and relieves BT from obligations laid down in the legal framework which applies to pension schemes in the United Kingdom.
Obravnavani ukrepi zadevajo določbe, na podlagi katerih vlada Združenega kraljestva s poroštvom države zagotavlja plačilo nekaterih obveznosti družbe BT, zlasti pokojninskih obveznosti, in oprosti družbo BT obveznosti, določenih v zakonskem okviru, ki velja za pokojninske sheme Združenega kraljestva.
The Crown guarantee
Poroštvo države
By virtue of the Telecommunications Act 1981, the telecommunications operation which had formerly formed part of the Post Office was transferred to a new public corporation, British Telecommunications.
Na podlagi Zakona o telekomunikacijah iz leta 1981 se je telekomunikacijska dejavnost, ki se je prej izvajala v okviru pošte („Post Office“), prenesla na novo javno družbo British Telecommunications.
The Telecommunications Act 1984 provided for the privatisation of British Telecommunications.
Družba British Telecommunications je bila privatizirana na podlagi Zakona o telekomunikacijah iz leta 1984.
Under section 60 of the Telecommunications Act 1984, the property, rights and liabilities of the public corporation were transferred to the privatised successor company, British Telecommunications plc.
V skladu s členom 60 Zakona o telekomunikacijah iz leta 1984 so se premoženje, pravice in obveznosti javne družbe prenesle na naslednico, in sicer privatizirano družbo British Telecommunications plc.
Included in the transfer were any liabilities of the public corporation in respect of its employees’ pension scheme, which at the time was showing a deficit of GBP 626 million revealed by the 1983 actuarial valuation of the scheme.
V prenos so bile vključene vse obveznosti javne družbe do pokojninske sheme njenih zaposlenih, ki je v tistem trenutku izkazovala primanjkljaj v višini 626 milijonov GBP, kot je pokazala aktuarska ocena sheme, opravljena leta 1983.
Section 68 of the Telecommunications Act 1984 laid down the Crown guarantee:
V členu 68 Zakona o telekomunikacijah iz leta 1984 je določeno poroštvo države:
This section applies where
Ta člen se uporablja, kadar
a resolution has been passed, in accordance with the [Insolvency Act 1986], for the voluntary winding up of the successor company, otherwise than merely for the purpose of reconstruction or amalgamation with another company; or
je v skladu z [Zakonom o plačilni nezmožnosti iz leta 1986] sprejet sklep o prostovoljni likvidaciji družbe naslednice, katerega namen ni zgolj sanacija družbe ali združitev z drugo družbo, ali
without any such resolution having been passed beforehand, an order has been made for the winding up of the successor company by the court under that Act.
brez predhodnega sprejetja takega sklepa sodišče v skladu z navedenim zakonom izda odredbo o likvidaciji družbe naslednice.
The Secretary of State shall become liable on the commencement of the winding up to discharge any outstanding liability of the successor company which vested in that company by virtue of section 60 above.
Državni sekretar je ob začetku likvidacije odgovoren za poravnavo vseh neporavnanih obveznosti družbe naslednice, ki so se prenesle na to družbo na podlagi člena 60.
Where the Secretary of State makes a payment to any person in discharge of what appears to him to be a liability imposed on him by this section, he shall thereupon become a creditor of the successor company to the extent of the amount paid, his claim being treated for the purposes of the winding up as a claim in respect of the original liability.’
Kadar državni sekretar opravi plačilo kateri koli osebi za poravnavo obveznosti, za katere meni, da so mu naložene v skladu s tem členom, postane upnik družbe naslednice v višini plačanega zneska, pri čemer se njegova terjatev za namene likvidacije obravnava kot terjatev v zvezi s prvotno obveznostjo.“
short-term liabilities falling due within one year totalled GBP 1909 million.
kratkoročne obveznosti, ki zapadejo v plačilo v enem letu, so znašale 1909 milijonov GBP.
They comprised short term borrowings, trade creditors, value added tax and payroll taxes, other creditors, accruals and deferred income,
Vključevale so kratkoročna posojila, obveznosti do dobaviteljev, davek na dodano vrednost in davke na izplačane plače, druge kratkoročne obveznosti ter pasivne časovne razmejitve,
long-term liabilities totalled GBP 458 million in foreign loans, which were reimbursed 10 years later.
dolgoročne obveznosti so znašale 458 milijonov GBP tujih posojil, ki so bila vrnjena deset let pozneje.
The Communication Act 2003 repealed section 60 and amended section 68(2) of the Telecommunications Act 1984, which now provides that ‘the Secretary of State shall become liable on the commencement of the winding up to discharge any outstanding liability of the successor company for the payment of pensions which vested in that company by virtue of section 60 above’ (emphasis added).
Z Zakonom o komunikacijah iz leta 2003 je razveljavljen člen 60 in spremenjen člen 68(2) Zakona o telekomunikacijah iz leta 1984, v katerem je zdaj določeno, da je „državni sekretar ob začetku likvidacije odgovoren za poravnavo vseh neporavnanih obveznosti družbe naslednice za plačilo pokojnin, ki so se prenesle na to družbo na podlagi člena 60“ (poudarek je dodan).
The Crown guarantee requires the Government of the United Kingdom to discharge any liability of the public corporation for payments of pensions transferred to BT in respect of employees who were members of the public corporation’s employee pension scheme before 6 August 1984, provided BT is insolvent and is being wound up and only if the liability is wholly or partly outstanding at the beginning of the winding up.
Poroštvo države določa, da mora vlada Združenega kraljestva poravnati vse obveznosti javne družbe za plačilo pokojnin, prenesenih na družbo BT v zvezi z zaposlenimi, ki so bili člani pokojninske sheme javne družbe pred 6. avgustom 1984, če je družba BT plačilno nezmožna in je v postopku likvidacije ter samo, če je obveznost v celoti ali delno neporavnana na začetku postopka likvidacije.
This presupposes that the assets of BT’s pension scheme are insufficient to cover its liabilities regarding the rights accrued to those employees.
Pri tem se domneva, da sredstva pokojninske sheme družbe BT ne zadostujejo za kritje obveznosti v zvezi s pravicami, ki so jih pridobile navedene zaposlene osebe.
Although the Telecommunications Act 1984 is not clear on this point, the authorities of the United Kingdom are of the opinion that the Crown guarantee covers not only the pension rights acquired by these employees before the privatisation but also those acquired after it.
Čeprav Zakon o telekomunikacijah iz leta 1984 glede tega ni jasen, organi Združenega kraljestva menijo, da poroštvo države krije pokojninske pravice, ki so jih zaposleni pridobili ne le pred privatizacijo, temveč tudi po njej.
Prior to the privatisation and given its status as public corporation, BT could not be wound up except by an Act of Parliament.
Pred privatizacijo likvidacija družbe BT glede na njen status javne družbe ni bila mogoča, razen na podlagi zakona.
As far as pension liabilities are concerned, the Crown guarantee was allegedly provided to allay the concerns of the public corporation’s employees who would no longer enjoy State protection for their pensions.
Kar zadeva pokojninske obveznosti, naj bi bil namen poroštva države pomiriti zaposlene v javni družbi, ki jim država ne bo več jamčila za njihove pokojnine.