natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
in Romanian Aplicarea Regulamentului (CE) nr. 950/2006, zahăr APE suplimentar.
v romunščini Aplicarea Regulamentului (CE) nr. 950/2006, zahăr APE suplimentar.
in Finnish Asetuksen (EY) N:o 950/2006 soveltaminen, talouskumppanuussopimuksen mukainen lisäsokeri.
v finščini Asetuksen (EY) N:o 950/2006 soveltaminen, talouskumppanuussopimuksen mukainen lisäsokeri.
in Swedish Tillämpning av förordning (EG) nr 950/2006, tilläggssocker enligt ekonomiskt partnerskapsavtal (EPA).
v švedščini Tillämpning av förordning (EG) nr 950/2006, tilläggssocker enligt ekonomiskt partnerskapsavtal (EPA).
“delivery period” means the period defined in Article 4 of the ACP Protocol and Article 4 of the Agreement with India. However, in respect of the delivery period beginning on 1 July 2009, “delivery period” means the period between 1 July 2009 and 30 September 2009, the date on which the ACP Protocol and the Agreement with India cease to bind the Community;’;
‚obdobje dobave‘ pomeni obdobje, določeno v členu 4 Protokola AKP in členu 4 Sporazuma z Indijo; obdobje dobave, ki se začne 1. julija 2009, pa se konča 30. septembra 2009, potem ko Protokol AKP in Sporazum z Indijo prenehata biti zavezujoča za Skupnost;“;
[poradové číslo sa vkladá podľa prílohy I] —
[poradové číslo sa vkladá podľa prílohy I]
950/2006, dodatni sladkor v okviru sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu.
v slovenščini Uporaba Uredbe (ES) št. 950/2006, dodatni sladkor v okviru sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu.
Council Regulation (EC) No 893/2008
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 893/2008
maintaining the anti-dumping duties on imports of polyester staple fibres originating in Belarus, the People’s Republic of China, Saudi Arabia and Korea following a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96
o ohranitvi protidampinških dajatev pri uvozu rezanih vlaken iz poliestra s poreklom iz Belorusije, Ljudske republike Kitajske, Saudove Arabije in Koreje po delnem vmesnem pregledu v skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Article 11(3),
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske Skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“) ter zlasti člena 11(3),
Measures in force and subject to review
Veljavni ukrepi, ki so predmet pregleda
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 428/2005 [2] imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyester staple fibres (PSF as defined in more detail in recital (15)) originating in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and Saudi Arabia and amended Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000 [3] imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyester staple fibres originating in the Republic of Korea (Korea).
Svet je z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 428/2005 [2] uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve pri uvozu rezanih vlaken iz poliestra („RVP“, kakor so natančneje opredeljena v uvodni izjavi 15) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) in Saudove Arabije ter spremenil Uredbo (ES) št. 2852/2000 [3] o uvedbi dokončnih protidampinških dajatev pri uvozu rezanih vlaken iz poliestra s poreklom iz Republike Koreje („Koreja“).
On 8 July 2008, the Court of First instance annulled Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 428/2005, to a limited extent, in relation to the anti-dumping duty imposed on exports into the European Community of goods produced and exported by the Korean company Huvis Corp [4].
Sodišče prve stopnje je 8. julija 2008 v omejenem obsegu razveljavilo člen 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 428/2005 v zvezi s protidampinškimi dajatvami pri izvozu blaga, ki ga proizvaja in izvaža korejsko podjetje Huvis Corp, v Evropsko skupnost [4].
Measures expired and subject to review
Ukrepi, ki so prenehali veljati in so predmet pregleda
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1799/2002 [5] imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of imports of PSF originating in Belarus.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 1799/2002 [5] uvedel dokončne protidampinške carine pri uvozu rezanih poliestrskih vlaken iz Belorusije.
The measures imposed by that Regulation expired on 11 October 2007.
Ukrepi, uvedeni z navedeno uredbo, so prenehali veljati 11. oktobra 2007.
Previous investigation concerning imports of PSF originating in Malaysia and Taiwan
Prejšnja preiskava v zvezi z uvozom RVP s poreklom iz Malezije in Tajvana
Following a withdrawal of the complaint, the Commission, by Decision 2007/430/EC [6] (the termination Decision) terminated an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of PSF originating in Malaysia and Taiwan (the previous investigation).
Komisija je po umiku pritožbe s Sklepom 2007/430/ES [6] („sklep o zaključku“) zaključila protidampinški postopek v zvezi z uvozom RVP s poreklom iz Malezije in Tajvana („prejšnja preiskava“).
In accordance with Article 9(1) of the basic Regulation it was considered that the termination of anti-dumping duties on imports from Malaysia and Taiwan was not against the Community interest.
V skladu s členom 9(1) osnovne uredbe se je štelo, da odprava protidampinških dajatev na uvoz iz Malezije in Tajvana ne nasprotuje interesu Skupnosti.
Having determined that there was sufficient prima facie evidence that the measures in force at the time could be no longer appropriate because their maintenance could be against the Community interest, the Commission initiated, on its own initiative, on 30 August 2007, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [7], a partial interim review of the measures, in force on that date, applicable to imports of PSF originating in Belarus, Korea, Saudi Arabia and the PRC (the countries concerned).
Komisija je 30. avgusta 2007 po tem, ko je ugotovila, da obstaja dovolj dokazov prima facie, da takrat veljavni ukrepi niso več ustrezni, saj bi bilo lahko njihovo ohranjanje proti interesu Skupnosti, na lastno pobudo in z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [7], sprožila delni vmesni pregled takrat veljavnih ukrepov v zvezi z uvozom RVP iz Belorusije, Koreje, Saudove Arabije in LRK („zadevne države“).
The review is limited to the examination of whether or not the continued imposition of measures is not against the Community interest, with the decision thereon possibly having retroactive effect as of 22 June 2007, i.e. the entry into force of the termination Decision.
Pregled je omejen na preiskavo v zvezi s tem, ali je nadaljnje izvajanje ukrepov v nasprotju z interesom Skupnosti ali ne, odločitev o tem pa bi lahko imela retroaktivni učinek od 22. junija 2007, tj. začetka veljavnosti sklepa o zaključku.
As mentioned above, the anti-dumping measures imposed on imports originating in Belarus lapsed on 11 October 2007.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, so protidampinški ukrepi pri uvozu iz Belorusije prenehali veljati 11. oktobra 2007.
As a consequence, the review concerning Belarus has been discontinued.
Zato je bil prekinjen pregled v zvezi z Belorusijo.
However, it was formally conducted until that date and the Commission considered in particular the question of retroactive repeal of measures in force between 22 June 2007 and 11 October 2007, should the conclusions warrant this.
Vendar se je do navedenega datuma uradno izvajal, Komisija pa je zlasti obravnavala vprašanje retroaktivne razveljavitve ukrepov, ki so veljali med 22. junijem 2007 in 11. oktobrom 2007, če sklepi to utemeljujejo.
The Commission officially advised the Community producers, the suppliers, the importers and users as well as associations of users and producers, exporters, and representatives of the countries concerned of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je o začetku postopka uradno obvestila proizvajalce, dobavitelje, uvoznike in uporabnike v Skupnosti ter združenja uporabnikov in proizvajalcev, izvoznike in zastopnike zadevnih držav.
All interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing.
Vse zainteresirane stranke so dobile priložnost, da izrazijo svoja stališča v pisni obliki in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
Complete questionnaire replies were received from 12 producers, 10 users, three importers, one European association of producers, one Austrian-German association of producers, one German federation of users, two associations belonging to this federation and one European association of users.
V celoti izpolnjene vprašalnike je poslalo dvanajst proizvajalcev, deset uporabnikov, trije uvozniki, eno evropsko združenje proizvajalcev, eno avstrijsko-nemško druženje proizvajalcev, ena nemška zveza uporabnikov, dve združenji iz te federacije ter eno evropsko združenje uporabnikov.
Further, the Commission received submissions from other producers, users and importers which did not provide a complete answer to the questionnaire.
Poleg tega je Komisija prejela ugotovitve drugih proizvajalcev, uporabnikov in uvoznikov, ki vprašalnika niso v celoti izpolnili.
Among the producers and users that participated in the investigation there are two vertically integrated groups that produce PSF (in part or in whole) for captive consumption.
Med proizvajalci in uporabniki, ki so sodelovali pri preiskavi, obstajata dve vertikalno integrirani skupini, ki proizvajata RVP (delno ali v celoti) za domačo porabo.
Finally, one association of Chinese exporters and two Korean exporters, assisted by their Authorities, have made their views known.
Stališča so s pomočjo svojih nacionalnih organov izrazili tudi eno kitajsko združenje izvoznikov in dva korejska izvoznika.
Exporters from Belarus and Saudi Arabia did not make their views known.
Izvozniki iz Belorusije in Saudove Arabije niso izrazili svojih stališč.
In addition, no parties made comments regarding the measures in relation to these two countries.
Poleg tega nobena stranka ni izrazila pripomb o ukrepih v zvezi s tema dvema državama.
The Commission sought and verified all information it deemed necessary to determine whether or not the continued imposition of the measures is against the Community interest.
Komisija je zahtevala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za ugotovitev, ali je nadaljnje izvajanje ukrepov v nasprotju z interesom Skupnosti ali ne.
Silon (Czech Republic),
Silon (Češka),
Trevira GmbH (Germany),
Trevira GmbH (Nemčija),
Advansa (Germany),
Advansa (Nemčija),
Wellman International Ltd (Ireland);
Wellman International Ltd (Irska);
PGI Nonwovens B.V (The Netherlands),
PGI Nonwovens B.V (Nizozemska),
Libeltex BVBA (Belgium),
Libeltex BVBA (Belgija),
Lück GmbH (Germany);
Lück GmbH (Nemčija);
Community user and producer
Uporabnik in proizvajalec Skupnosti:
ORV Manufacturing SpA (Italy);
ORV Manufacturing SpA (Italija);
associations of users
Združenji uporabnikov:
Gesamtverband Textil + Mode (Confederation of the German Textile and Fashion Industry),
Gesamtverband Textil + Mode (združenje nemške tekstilne in modne industrije),
Edana (European Disposables And Non-woven Applications).
Edana (evropski izdelki za enkratno uporabo in netkani izdelki).
The review investigation period (RIP) covered the period from 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007.
Obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („OPP“) je trajalo od 1. julija 2006 do 30. junija 2007.
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment covered the period from 1 January 2004 to the end of the RIP (the period considered).
Preučevanje gibanj, pomembnih za oceno, je zajemalo obdobje od 1. januarja 2004 do konca OPP („zadevno obdobje“).
It is recalled that in the previous investigation, the investigation period covered the period from 1 January to 31 December 2005 and the examination of trends relevant for the assessment covered the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2005.
Opozoriti je treba, da je obdobje prejšnje preiskave trajalo od 1. januarja do 31. decembra 2005, preučevanje gibanj, pomembnih za oceno, pa je zajemalo obdobje od 1. januarja 2002 do 31. decembra 2005.
The product concerned is the same as in the investigations mentioned in recitals (1) to (3): synthetic staple fibres of polyesters, not carded, combed or otherwise processed for spinning.
Zadevni izdelek je enak kot pri preiskavah iz uvodnih izjav od 1 do 3: sintetična rezana vlakna iz poliestra, nemikana, nečesana in ne drugače pripravljena za predenje.
It is currently classifiable within CN code 55032000.
Zdaj se uvrščajo pod oznako KN 55032000.
It is commonly referred to as polyester staple fibres (PSF).
Ponavadi se za ta izdelek uporablja ime rezana vlakna iz poliestra („RVP“).
The product is a basic material used at various stages of the manufacturing process of textile products.
Izdelek se uporablja kot osnovni material v proizvodnji tekstilnih izdelkov in se predeluje v različnih fazah proizvodnega postopka.
Consumption in the Community
Poraba v Skupnosti
The determination of total Community consumption was based on the import and export statistics from Eurostat and the production of the Community industry (as defined in recital (26)), and other Community producers.
Določitev celotne porabe Skupnosti je temeljila na statističnih podatkih Eurostata o uvozu in izvozu ter proizvodnji industrije Skupnosti (kot opredeljuje uvodna izjava 26) in drugih proizvajalcih Skupnosti.
As shown in the table above, consumption of PSF has slightly decreased during the period considered.
Kot prikazuje zgornja tabela, se je poraba RVP v zadevnem obdobju rahlo zmanjšala.
This trend is in clear contrast with the situation examined in the previous investigation where consumption in the Community, as indicated in the Regulation imposing provisional duties [8], increased by 3 % during the period considered in that investigation (2002 to 2005).
To gibanje jasno nasprotuje stanju, ki je bilo ugotovljeno v obdobju prejšnje preiskave (2002–2005), ko se je poraba Skupnosti, kot navaja Uredba o uvedbi začasnih protidampinških dajatev [8], povečala za 3 %.
Imports from Belarus, the PRC, Saudi Arabia and Korea: volume, market share and import prices
Uvoz iz Belorusije, LRK, Saudove Arabije in Koreje: količina, tržni delež in uvozne cene
The volume of imports into the Community from the countries concerned decreased by 28 % between 2004 and the RIP and the market share went from 24,4 % to 18 % whereas prices increased by 16 %.
Količina uvoza v Skupnost iz zadevnih držav se je med letom 2004 in OPP zmanjšala za 28 %, tržni delež se je zmanjšal s 24,4 % na 18 %, cene pa so se povišale za 16 %.
The data are based on Eurostat statistics.
Podatki temeljijo na statistiki Eurostata.
Prices 000 EUR/tonne
Cene '000 EUR/tono
The sharp increase of imports from Korea during the RIP was mainly due to the imposition of provisional anti-dumping duties on Taiwanese imports during the first semester of 2007 [9].
K močnemu povečanju uvoza iz Koreje v OPP je zlasti prispevala uvedba začasnih protidampinških ukrepov pri uvozu iz Tajvana v prvem polletju 2007 [9].
Both Korea and Taiwan are the main suppliers of Low Melt Polyester (LMP) and Hollow Conjugated Siliconised polyester (HCS).
Koreja in Tajvan sta glavna dobavitelja poliestra z nizkim tališčem („LMP“) in votlega konjugata silikoniziranega poliestra („HCS“).
Since the level of provisional duties imposed on Taiwanese imports reached 29,5 % for certain companies, Community importers decided to source LMP and HCS from Korea where the level of anti-dumping duties was significantly lower.
Ker je stopnja začasnih dajatev na uvoz iz Tajvana dosegla 29,5 % za nekatera podjetja, so uvozniki Skupnosti sklenili, da uvozijo LMP in HCS iz Koreje, kjer je stopnja protidampinških dajatev bistveno nižja.
Imports from other third countries: volume, market share and import prices
Uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav: količina, tržni delež in uvozne cene
During the period considered imports from other third countries have increased by 49 %.
V zadevnim obdobju se je uvoz iz tretjih držav povečal za 49 %.
The reason for such increase is linked to the imposition in March 2005 of anti-dumping duties on imports from Saudi Arabia and the PRC and the repeal of anti-dumping measures on imports from Indonesia, Thailand and India in October 2006.
Razlog za to povečanje je povezano z uvedbo protidampinških dajatev na uvoz iz Saudove Arabije in LRK marca 2005 in razveljavitev protidampinških ukrepov pri uvozu iz Indonezije, Tajske in Indije oktobra 2006.
During the RIP, PSF was manufactured by 19 producers in the Community.
V OPP je RVP proizvajalo 19 proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
Cooperation from Community producers was very high in this investigation.
Stopnja sodelovanja proizvajalcev Skupnosti pri tej preiskavi je bila zelo visoka.
Amongst the 19 community producers, 12 producers accounting for 70 % of production have fully cooperated.
Od 19 proizvajalcev Skupnosti je popolnoma sodelovalo 12 proizvajalcev, ki pokrivajo 70 % proizvodnje.
Other Community producers have made submissions in relation to the investigation but have not provided full cooperation.
Drugi proizvajalci Skupnosti so predložili ugotovitve v zvezi s preiskavo, vendar niso popolnoma sodelovali.
Moreover, two associations of producers (CIRFS and IVC) [10] have also submitted their comments.
Poleg tega sta dve združenji (CIRFS in IVC) [10] predložili tudi svoje pripombe.
In addition, all Community producers have provided information on their production.
Poleg tega so vsi proizvajalci Skupnosti predložili informacije o svoji proizvodnji.
If all submissions received (individual producers and associations) are taken into account, it can be concluded that Community producers accounting for 88 % of Community production have made their views known and are against the termination of the measures.
Če se upoštevajo vse prejete ugotovitve (posameznih proizvajalcev in združenj), se lahko sklene, da so proizvajalci Skupnosti, ki pokrivajo 88 % proizvodnje Skupnosti, izrazili svoja stališča in nasprotujejo razveljavitvi ukrepov.
This level of cooperation is significantly higher than in the previous investigation where only three companies accounting for slightly more than 25 % of Community production and one association of producers (CIRFS) cooperated with the Commission and subsequently withdrew the complaint.
Ta stopnja sodelovanja je bistveno višja kot pri prejšnji preiskavi, pri kateri so s Komisijo sodelovala le tri podjetja, ki pokrivajo malo več kot 25 % proizvodnje Skupnosti, in eno združenje proizvajalcev (CIRFS), nazadnje pa so pritožbo umaknili.
The Commission examined all relevant economic factors and indices having a bearing on the situation of the Community producers.
Komisija je preučila vse ustrezne gospodarske dejavnike in kazalnike, ki vplivajo na položaj proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
As indicated above, during the RIP, PSF was manufactured by 19 producers in the Community.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, je RVP v OPP proizvajalo 19 proizvajalcev v Skupnosti.
These 19 producers thus constitute the total Community production within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation.
Teh 19 proizvajalcev se tako šteje za celotno proizvodnjo Skupnosti v smislu člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe.
Twelve Community producers (Advansa GmbH, Fibracat Europa S.L., Fidion S.r.l., Frana Polifibre SpA, Greenfiber International S.A., IMP Comfort Sp.z o.o., Märkische Faser, Nurel S.A., ORV Manufacturing SpA, Silon s.r.o., Trevira GmbH and Wellman International Ltd) fully cooperated in the investigation.
Pri preiskavi je popolnoma sodelovalo 12 proizvajalcev Skupnosti (Advansa GmbH, Fibracat Europa S.L., Fidion S.r.l., Frana Polifibre SpA, Greenfiber International S.A., IMP Comfort Sp.z o.o., Märkische Faser, Nurel S.A., ORV Manufacturing SpA, Silon s.r.o., Trevira GmbH in Wellman International Ltd).
During the RIP they produced 347640 tonnes and they account for 70 % of Community production.
V OPP so proizvedli 347640 ton in pokrivajo 70 % proizvodnje Skupnosti.
Accordingly they represented a major proportion of the total Community production of the product concerned during the RIP.
Tako so v OPP prispevali velik delež celotne proizvodnje Skupnosti zadevnega izdelka.
It was therefore considered that the 12 Community producers that have fully cooperated with the investigation represented the Community industry within the meaning of Articles 4(1) and 5(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se je obravnavalo, da je 12 proizvajalcev Skupnosti, ki so popolnoma sodelovali pri preiskavi, predstavljalo industrijo Skupnosti v smislu členov 4(1) in 5(4) osnovne uredbe.
They are herein referred to as the ‘Community industry’.
V tej uredbi so opredeljeni kot „industrija Skupnosti“.
Between 2004 and the RIP, production and market share of the Community industry evolved as follows:
Med letom 2004 in OPP sta se proizvodnja in tržni delež industrije Skupnosti razvijala, kot sledi:
Production volume (tonnes)
Obseg proizvodnje (v tonah)
After a decrease in 2005, Community production has increased by 10 % compared to the situation in 2004.
Po zmanjšanju leta 2005 se je proizvodnja Skupnosti povečala za 10 % v primerjavi z razmerami leta 2004.
This increase is linked, inter alia, to the setting up of new PSF plants in Poland and Romania in 2006.
To povečanje je med drugim povezano z namestitvijo novih obratov za RVP na Poljskem in v Romuniji leta 2006.
It is expected that production will continue to grow in the future with the consolidation of the activities of the new abovementioned plants and the starting up of another plant in Bulgaria with an annual capacity of between 12000 and 14500 tonnes.
Proizvodnja se bo po pričakovanjih v prihodnosti povečevala s konsolidacijo dejavnosti zgoraj omenjenih novih obratov in z namestitvijo novega obrata v Bolgariji z letno zmogljivostjo med 12000 in 14500 tonami.
As for market share, it also decreased in 2005 and rose in 2006 and 2007.
Tudi tržni delež se je leta 2005 zmanjšal, leta 2006 in 2007 pa povečal.
If we compare this table with production of the Community industry of the previous investigation (as defined in recital (70) of the Regulation imposing provisional duties) [11] during the period considered in that investigation (2002 to 2005), the trend has changed.
Če primerjamo to tabelo s proizvodnjo industrije Skupnosti iz prejšnje preiskave (kot je opredeljeno v uvodni izjavi 70 Uredbe o uvedbi začasnih dajatev) [11], se je gibanje v zadevnem obdobju te preiskave (2002–2005) spremenilo.
Indeed, between 2002 and 2005, the production of that Community industry decreased by 9 % whereas during the period considered in this investigation production of Community industry has increased by 10 %.
Dejansko se je med letoma 2002 in 2005 proizvodnja navedene industrije Skupnosti zmanjšala za 9 %, medtem ko se je v zadevnem obdobju te preiskave proizvodnja industrije Skupnosti povečala za 10 %.
As regards market share the situation is different as well.
Tudi tržni delež se je spremenil.
Indeed, market share of the Community industry in the previous investigation decreased by 2,3 percentage points whereas in the present investigation the market share of the Community industry has increased by almost 5 percentage points.
Dejansko se je tržni delež industrije Skupnosti iz prejšnje preiskave zmanjšal za 2,3 odstotni točki, medtem ko se je tržni delež industrije Skupnosti iz sedanje preiskave povečal za skoraj 5 odstotnih točk.
Between 2004 and 2005 there was a decrease in capacity of 6 %.
Med letoma 2004 in 2005 se je zmogljivost zmanjšala za 6 %.
As from 2006 capacity started to increase and reached a level of almost 413000 tonnes during the RIP (almost 13 % higher than in 2004).
Od leta 2006 se je zmogljivost začela povečevati in je v OPP dosegla raven skoraj 413000 ton (skoraj 13 % višjo raven kot leta 2004).
This increase was mainly due to the fact that two of the cooperating producers have installed new plants in Poland and Romania that started to operate in 2006.
K temu povečanju je zlasti prispevalo dejstvo, da sta dva sodelujoča proizvajalca namestila nova obrata na Poljskem in v Romuniji, ki sta začela delovati leta 2006.
As for capacity utilisation, it decreased by 2,4 percentage points during the period considered.
Izkoriščenost zmogljivosti se je v zadevnem obdobju zmanjšala za 2,4 odstotni točki.