natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
These duty rates (as opposed to the country-wide duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of products originating in the country concerned and produced by the companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Te stopnje dajatev (v nasprotju z dajatvijo na ravni države, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“) veljajo torej izključno za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz zadevne države, ki jih proizvajajo te družbe, torej navedeni specifični pravni subjekti.
Any claim requesting the application of an individual company countervailing duty rate (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [11] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company’s activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for example, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo stopnje izravnalne dajatve za posamezne družbe (na primer zaradi spremembe imena podjetja ali ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov) se takoj naslovi na Komisijo [11] skupaj z vsemi ustreznimi informacijami, zlasti o vsaki spremembi dejavnosti družbe na področju proizvodnje, domače prodaje in izvoza, povezanimi na primer z navedeno spremembo imena ali spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov.
If appropriate, the Regulation will then be amended accordingly by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual duty rates.
Ta uredba bo nato po potrebi ustrezno spremenjena s posodobitvijo seznama družb, upravičenih do posameznih stopenj dajatve.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of definitive countervailing duties.
Vse stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je bilo predvideno, da se priporoči uvedba dokončnih izravnalnih dajatev.
Certain US cooperating exporting producers offered price undertakings in accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation.
Nekateri sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki iz ZDA so ponudili cenovne zaveze v skladu s členom 13(1) osnovne uredbe.
It is noted that in view of significant price variations of the raw material, the product is not considered suitable for a fixed price undertaking.
Opozarja se, da se glede na močna nihanja v ceni surovin šteje, da izdelek ni primeren za fiksne cenovne zaveze.
In this context, the companies proposed that the minimum import prices (MIPs) are indexed regularly in relation to the fluctuations of the prices of rapeseed oil.
V teh okoliščinah so družbe predlagale, da bi bile najnižje uvozne cene (MIP) redno indeksirane glede na nihanja cen repičnega olja.
Moreover, they offered MIPs for three types to take account of the product variety upon importation (biodiesel obtained from soybean, palm or canola oil) on the basis of the feedstock coefficients established during the IP.
Poleg tega so predlagale MIP za tri vrste izdelkov, da se upošteva različnost izdelkov ob uvozu (biodizel iz sojinega ali palmovega olja ali olja kanole) na podlagi koeficientov za surovine, določenih v OP.
On the basis of the above, and without referring to any further company specific practical issues regarding their acceptance, it was considered that the undertakings had to be rejected as the method to determine the MIPs was inappropriate and that the offered MIPs were not at levels that would eliminate the injurious subsidisation.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega in brez obravnavanja praktičnih vidikov sprejetja zavez s strani posameznih družb se je štelo, da je treba ponudbe za zaveze zavrniti, saj metoda za določitev MIP ni bila pravilna in ker raven predlaganih MIP ne bi zadostovala za odpravo škodljivega subvencioniranja.
Subsequent to the disclosure of final findings, the complainant requested special measures to prevent possible circumvention of the measures in view of the fact that the market concerned is a global commodity market with a fungible product commercialised through various sales channels.
Po razkritju dokončnih ugotovitev je pritožnik zahteval posebne ukrepe za preprečitev možnega izogibanja ukrepom glede na to, da je zadevni trg globalni trg surovin z značilnostmi nadomestljivega izdelka, ki se trži po različnih prodajnih kanalih.
In consideration of the above, it is indeed considered appropriate to monitor closely the imports of biodiesel from all destinations, with a view of facilitating swift appropriate action should the situation so require.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se šteje za ustrezno, da se strogo nadzoruje uvoz biodizla iz različnih virov za omogočenje hitrega in ustreznega ukrepanja, če bi okoliščine to zahtevale.
In view of the magnitude of the subsidy margins found and in the light of the level of the injury caused to the Community industry, it is considered necessary that the amounts secured by way of the provisional countervailing duty, imposed by the provisional Regulation should be definitively collected to the extent of the amount of the definitive duties imposed.
Glede na višino ugotovljenih stopenj subvencije in stopnjo škode, povzročene industriji Skupnosti, se šteje, da je treba zneske, zavarovane z začasno izravnalno dajatvijo, ki je bila uvedena z začasno uredbo, dokončno pobrati v višini zneska uvedenih dokončnih dajatev.
Where the definitive duties are lower than the provisional duties, amounts provisionally secured in excess of the definitive rate of countervailing duties shall be released.
Če so dokončne dajatve nižje od začasnih, se sprostijo začasno zavarovani zneski, ki presegajo dokončno stopnjo izravnalnih dajatev.
Where the definitive duties are higher than the provisional duties, only the amounts secured at the level of the provisional duties shall be definitively collected,
Če so dokončne dajatve višje od začasnih, se dokončno poberejo samo zneski, zavarovani na ravni začasnih dajatev,
A definitive countervailing duty is hereby imposed on imports of fatty-acid mono-alkyl esters and/or paraffinic gasoil obtained from synthesis and/or hydro-treatment, of non-fossil origin, commonly known as ‘biodiesel’, in pure form or in a blend containing by weight more than 20 % of fatty-acid mono-alkyl esters and/or paraffinic gasoil obtained from synthesis and/or hydro-treatment, of non-fossil origin, currently falling within CN codes ex15162098 (TARIC code 1516209820), ex15180091 (TARIC code 1518009120), ex15180099 (TARIC code 1518009920), ex27101941 (TARIC code 2710194120), 38249091, ex38249097 (TARIC code 3824909787), and originating in the United States of America.
Uvede se dokončna izravnalna dajatev na uvoz monoalkilnih estrov maščobnih kislin in/ali parafinskega plinskega olja, pridobljenega s sintezo in/ali hidrotretiranjem, nefosilnega izvora, splošno znanih kot „biodizel“, v čisti obliki ali mešanici, ki vsebujejo več kot 20 masnih % monoalkilnih estrov maščobnih kislin in/ali parafinskega plinskega olja, pridobljenega s sintezo in/ali hidrotretiranjem, nefosilnega izvora, ki so trenutno uvrščeni pod oznake KN ex15162098 (oznaka TARIC 1516209820), ex15180091 (oznaka TARIC 1518009120), ex15180099 (oznaka TARIC 1518009920), ex27101941 (oznaka TARIC 2710194120), 38249091, ex38249097 (oznaka TARIC 3824909787), ter s poreklom iz Združenih držav Amerike.
The rate of the definitive countervailing duty applicable to the products described in paragraph 1 and manufactured by the companies below shall be:
Stopnja dokončne izravnalne dajatve, ki se uporablja za izdelke iz odstavka 1, ki jih proizvajajo družbe, navedene v nadaljevanju, je:
Countervailing duty rate Euro per tonne net
Stopnja izravnalne dajatve v EUR na neto tono
Companies listed in the Annex
družbe s seznama v Prilogi
The countervailing duty on blends shall be applicable in proportion in the blend, by weight, of the total content of fatty-acid mono-alkyl esters and of paraffinic gasoils obtained from synthesis and/or hydro-treatment, of non-fossil origin (biodiesel content).
Stopnja izravnalne dajatve za mešanice se uporablja glede na masni delež skupne vsebnosti monoalkilnih estrov maščobnih kislin in parafinskega plinskega olja, pridobljenih s sintezo in/ali hidrotretiranjem, nefosilnega izvora (vsebnost biodizla), v mešanici.
Amounts secured by way of provisional countervailing duties pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 194/2009 on imports of biodiesel falling within CN codes ex15162098 (TARIC code 1516209820), ex15180091 (TARIC code 1518009120), ex15180099 (TARIC code 1518009920), ex27101941 (TARIC code 2710194120), 38249091, ex38249097 (TARIC code 3824909787), and originating in the United States of America shall be definitively collected.
Zneski, zavarovani z začasnimi izravnalnimi dajatvami v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 194/2009 o uvozu biodizla, uvrščenega pod oznake KN ex15162098 (oznaka TARIC 1516209820), ex15180091 (oznaka TARIC 1518009120), ex15180099 (oznaka TARIC 1518009920), ex27101941 (oznaka TARIC 2710194120), 38249091, ex38249097 (oznaka TARIC 3824909787), in s poreklom iz Združenih držav, se dokončno poberejo.
The amounts secured in excess of the amount of the definitive countervailing duties shall be released.
Zavarovani zneski, ki presegajo znesek dokončnih izravnalnih dajatev, se sprostijo.
Where the definitive duties are higher than the provisional duties, only the amounts secured at the level of the provisional duties shall be definitively collected.
Če so dokončne dajatve višje od začasnih, se dokončno poberejo samo zneski, zavarovani na ravni začasnih dajatev.
OJ L 288, 21.10.1997, p. 1.
UL L 288, 21.10.1997, str. 1
OJ L 67, 12.3.2009, p. 50.
UL L 67, 12.3.2009, str. 50.
OJ L 67, 12.3.2009, p. 22.
UL L 67, 12.3.2009, str. 22.
Article 28(1) of the basic Regulation states: ‘In cases in which any interested party refuses access to, or otherwise does not provide, necessary information within the time limits provided in this Regulation, or significantly impedes the investigation, provisional or final findings, affirmative or negative, may be made on the basis of the facts available.
Člen 28(1) osnovne uredbe določa: „V primerih, ko katera koli stranka ne dovoli dostopa do informacij ali na kak drug način ne dobavi potrebnih informacij v rokih, ki jih navaja ta uredba, ali pa močno ovira preiskavo, se lahko začasne ali dokončne ugotovitve, bodisi pozitivne ali negativne, naredijo na osnovi dostopnih dejstev.
Unlike those companies which received a sampling form but did not return it.
V nasprotju z družbami, ki so prejele obrazec za vzorčenje, a ga niso izpolnile in poslale nazaj.
Heading number 3826 00 to cover ‘biodiesel and mixtures thereof, not containing or containing less than 70 % by weight of petroleum oils or oils obtained from bituminous minerals’.
Tarifna številka 3826 00, ki bo vključevala „biodizel in njegove mešanice, ki ne vsebujejo naftnega olja ali olj, pridobljenih iz bituminoznih mineralov, ali ga vsebujejo manj kot 70 mas %“.
‘Mixtures composite goods consisting of different materials or made of different components and goods put in sets for retail sales, which cannot be classified by reference to 3(a), shall be classified as if they consisted of the material or component which gives them their essential character in so far as this criterion is applicable.’
„Mešanice, sestavljeni proizvodi, ki vsebujejo različne materiale ali so izdelani iz različnih sestavin, ter proizvodi, pripravljeni v sklopih za prodajo na drobno, ki se ne morejo uvrstiti s sklicevanjem na točko 3(a), se uvrstijo, kot da so iz materiala ali sestavine, ki jim daje bistven značaj, če je to merilo uporabno.“
HTS codes 38 24 90 40 00 and 38 24 90 40 20.
Oznaki HTS 38 24 90 40 00 in 38 24 90 40 20.
Case T-348/05: JSC Kirovo-Chepetsky Khimichesky Kombinat v Council, 10 September 2008, paras 61-63.
Zadeva T-348/05: JSC Kirovo-Chepetsky Khimichesky Kombinat proti Svetu, 10. september 2008, točke od 61 do 63.
US co-operating exporting producers not sampled
Sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki iz ZDA, ki niso bili vključeni v vzorec
Certain parties commented on the representativity of the sample of Community producers.
Nekatere stranke so predložile pripombe k reprezentativnosti vzorca proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
These comments are addressed in recitals (77) to (81) below.
Te pripombe so obravnavane v uvodnih izjavah od (77) do (81) spodaj.
It should be clarified that the subsidy and the injury findings of each company investigated were exclusively based on the relevant product types which were produced and sold by the relevant company during the IP.
Treba je pojasniti, da so ugotovitve o subvencioniranju in škodi za vsako preiskano družbo temeljile izključno na zadevnih vrstah izdelkov, ki jih je zadevna družba proizvajala in prodajala v OP.
Claiming that the definition of the product concerned including blends above B20 would affect unduly US producers is not founded and cannot lead to the conclusion that the product concerned should be limited to the products that contain 100 % of biodiesel (B100) even if composed of biodiesel of different feedstock or a blend composed of 99 % of biodiesel (B99).
Trditev, da bi opredelitev zadevnega izdelka, ki vključuje mešanice nad B20, neupravičeno prizadela ameriške proizvajalce, ni utemeljena in ne more biti podlaga sklepu, da je treba zadevni izdelek omejiti na izdelke, ki vsebujejo 100 % biodizla (B100), tudi če je biodizel pridobljen iz različnih surovin, ali mešanico iz 99 % biodizla (B99).
In this regard it is recalled that as mentioned in recital (75) above, the Community production of biodiesel blends between B20 and B99 has been very limited during the IP.
V zvezi s tem se opozarja, da je bila proizvodnja mešanic biodizla med B20 in B99 v OP zelo omejena, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (75).
In view of this limited quantity, which represents less than 2 % of total Community production of the like product in the IP, it can be concluded that the selection of the sample which was mainly based on the largest volume of production and sales within the Community was representative.
Ob upoštevanju te omejene količine, ki znaša manj kot 2 % celotne proizvodnje podobnega izdelka v Skupnosti v OP, je mogoče sklepati, da je bil izbor vzorca, ki je temeljil zlasti na največjem obsegu proizvodnje in prodaje v Skupnosti, reprezentativen.
The analysis of the import volume from the USA was therefore deficient.
Zato je bila analiza obsega uvoza iz ZDA pomanjkljiva.
The same interested party proposed that the trends established for the investigated US producers be used instead.
Ista zainteresirana stranka je predlagala, naj se namesto tega uporabijo trendi, ugotovljeni za ameriške proizvajalce, ki se preiskujejo.
Moreover, in view of the fact that between 2007 and the IP the market share of the Community industry increased by 2,8 percentage points, would indeed support the conclusion reached in recital (223) of the provisional Regulation that injury suffered by the Community industry cannot be attributed to this slight contraction in demand between 2007 and the IP.
Poleg tega se lahko ob upoštevanju dejstva, da se je tržni delež industrije Skupnosti med letom 2007 in OP povečal za 2,8 odstotne točke, dejansko podpre sklep iz uvodne izjave (223) začasne uredbe, da škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, ni mogoče pripisati temu zanemarljivemu zmanjšanju povpraševanja med letom 2007 in OP.
Therefore, in the absence of any other comments concerning the development of demand on the Community market recital (223) of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb v zvezi z gibanjem povpraševanja na trgu Skupnosti ni bilo, se zato uvodna izjava (223) začasne uredbe potrdi.
In relation to the offers of the co-operating exporting producers it is noted that the basis to establish an indexed MIP was on average between 7-8 % lower than the non injurious price established during the IP.
V zvezi s ponudbami sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov se opozarja, da je bila osnova za določitev indeksirane MIP v povprečju med 7 in 8 % nižja od neškodljive cene, določene med OP.
Moreover, the proposed coefficients to arrive at adjusted MIPs for the types mentioned above were inappropriate as they related to the IP.
Poleg tega so bili koeficienti, predlagani za izračun prilagojenih MIP za zgoraj navedene vrste neustrezni, ker so se nanašali na OP.
Indeed, in view of the fact that these coefficients, which depend on the difference in price between the feedstock, continuously fluctuate, these coefficients may have considerably changed in relation to the situation observed during the IP.
Glede na to, da ti koeficienti, odvisni od razlike v ceni med surovinami, stalno nihajo, bi se lahko močno spremenili glede na ugotovljene okoliščine v OP.
Therefore, the proposed indexation of MIPs for soybean biodiesel or palm oil biodiesel on the basis of price fluctuations of the rapeseed oil was considered inappropriate as it would be based on the evolution of prices of raw material different to the ones used for the production of the exported product concerned.
Zato se je štelo, da je predlagana indeksacija MIP za biodizel iz sojinega ali palmovega olja na podlagi nihanja cen repičnega olja, neustrezna, saj bi temeljila na gibanju cen surovin, ki so drugačne od surovin, uporabljenih za proizvodnjo zadevnega izvoženega izdelka.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade, Directorate H, Office N105 04/092, 1049 Brussels, Belgium.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade, Directorate H, Office N105 04/092, 1049 Bruselj, Belgija.
Firstly, because B100 or pure biodiesel is the core product for which the US subsidies were established.
Prvič, ker je B100 ali čisti biodizel glavni izdelek, za katerega so bile uvedene subvencije v ZDA.
This is clear from the US Internal Revenue Code (US.
Iz notranjega davčnega zakonika ZDA (US.
Council Regulation (EC) No 599/2009
Uredba sveta (ES) št. 599/2009
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of biodiesel originating in the United States of America
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz biodizla s poreklom iz Združenih držav Amerike
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the ‘basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), in zlasti člena 9 Uredbe,
The Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 193/2009 [2] (the ‘provisional Regulation’) imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of biodiesel originating in the United States of America (‘USA’ or ‘country concerned’).
Komisija je z Uredbo (ES) št. 193/2009 [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: začasna uredba) uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz biodizla s poreklom iz Združenih držav Amerike (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ZDA ali zadevna država).
In the parallel anti-subsidy proceeding, the Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 194/2009 [3] imposed a provisional countervailing duty on imports of biodiesel originating in the United States of America.
Komisija je v vzporednem protisubvencijskem postopku z Uredbo (ES) št. 194/2009 [3] uvedla začasno izravnalno dajatev na uvoz biodizla s poreklom iz Združenih držav Amerike.
Subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was decided to impose provisional anti-dumping measures (‘provisional disclosure’), several interested parties made written submissions making their views known on the provisional findings.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta odločitev za uvedbo začasnih protidampinških ukrepov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: začasno razkritje), je več zainteresiranih strank predložilo pisna stališča v zvezi z začasnimi ugotovitvami.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of definitive anti-dumping measures on imports of biodiesel originating in the USA and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of the provisional duty (‘final disclosure’).
Vse stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je bila predvidena priporočitev uvedbe dokončnih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz biodizla s poreklom iz ZDA in dokončnega pobiranja zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: dokončno razkritje).
The US Government (USG) and other interested parties expressed their disappointment with the decision to grant only sixteen days to provide comments on the provisional disclosure and also with the decision to decline the requests of certain parties for a meaningful extension of time to file those comments.
Vlada Združenih držav (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ameriška vlada) in druge zainteresirane stranke so bile razočarane zaradi odločitve, da se za predložitev pripomb k začasnem razkritju dovoli le šestnajst dni, in odločitve, da se zavrnejo prošnje nekaterih strank za smiselno podaljšanje roka za predložitev teh pripomb.
Article 20(1) of the basic Regulation provides that interested parties may be provided with the details underlying the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which provisional measures have been imposed.
Člen 20(1) osnovne uredbe določa, da lahko zainteresirane stranke zahtevajo razkritje podrobnosti, na katerih temeljijo bistvena dejstva in premisleki, na podlagi katerih so bili uvedeni začasni ukrepi.
In this regard, it is the Commission's practice to provide disclosure to all interested parties to a proceeding upon publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of a regulation imposing provisional measures and to provide a period of time within which parties may provide comments thereon.
Praksa Komisije v zvezi s tem je, da vsem zainteresiranim strankam v postopku razkrije informacije po objavi uredbe o uvedbi začasnih ukrepov v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in določi rok, v katerem lahko stranke predložijo pripombe.
In this proceeding, it was considered that a period of sixteen days (subsequently extended to seventeen days) be granted given the complexity of the proceeding and the need to respect the requirement in Article 11(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation that the investigation be concluded within thirteen months of initiation.
V tem postopku se je dovolilo 16-dnevno obdobje (ki se je pozneje podaljšalo na 17 dni), in sicer zaradi zapletenosti postopka in potrebe po izpolnitvi zahteve iz člena 11(9) osnovne uredbe, da je treba preiskavo končati v 13 mesecih po njenem začetku.
Further to the disclosure of the provisional findings in the parallel anti-subsidy proceeding, the USG commented on the duty rate established for ‘all other companies’.
Ameriška vlada je v zvezi z razkritjem začasnih ugotovitev v vzporednem protisubvencijskem postopku predložila pripombe k stopnji dajatve, ki je bila določena za „vse druge družbe“.
The same method was also applied in the anti-dumping proceeding.
Enaka metoda se je uporabila tudi v protidampinškem postopku.
The rate of the anti-dumping duty so established was as set out in Article 1(2) of the provisional Regulation (‘all other companies’ rate of EUR 182,4 per tonne).
Tako določena stopnja protidampinške dajatve je bila enaka stopnji iz člena 1(2) začasne uredbe (stopnja za „vse druge družbe“ v višini 182,4 EUR na tono).
The USG considers that this rate of duty is a rate improperly calculated on the basis of the facts available.
Ameriška vlada meni, da je ta stopnja dajatve nepravilno izračunana na podlagi dostopnih dejstev.
The USG considers that, in order to rely on facts available under Article 18 of the basic Regulation, it must first be determined that an interested party has refused or failed to provide the ‘necessary information’ [4].
Meni, da je treba za zanesljivo uporabo dostopnih dejstev na podlagi člena 18 osnovne uredbe naprej ugotoviti, da zainteresirana stranka ni dovolila dostopa do „potrebnih informacij“ [4] ali jih ni predložila.