natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It follows that, in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, recovery is sought in respect only of the aid granted after 12 November 2005.
Iz tega je razvidno, da se v skladu s členom 14 Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999 vračilo zahteva samo za pomoči, dodeljene po 12. novembru 2005.
This decision concerns the aid scheme in question and must be implemented with immediate effect, in particular so far as concerns the recovery of all the individual aid granted under that scheme, except for that granted to specific projects which, when it was granted, fulfilled all the conditions set in the de minimis Regulation or for an applicable exemption or in an aid scheme approved by the Commission,
Ta odločba se nanaša na zadevno shemo pomoči in jo je treba takoj izvršiti, zlasti kar zadeva vračilo posamičnih pomoči, dodeljenih v okviru te sheme, z izjemo pomoči, namenjenih posebnim projektom, ki so v trenutku dodelitve izpolnjevali pogoje, določene v uredbi de minimis ali za uporabo oprostitve ali v shemi pomoči, ki jo je potrdila Komisija –
The aid scheme set up for the restructuring of cooperatives in the fisheries sector and for their consortia and unlawfully put into effect by Italy, in breach of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty, is incompatible with the common market.
Shema pomoči, uvedena za prestrukturiranje zadrug ribiškega sektorja in njihovih združenj in nezakonito izvršena v Italiji, v nasprotju s členom 88(3) Pogodbe, je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
The individual aid granted to a fisheries cooperative or to one of its consortia under the regime referred to in Article 1 of this Decision is not aid if, at the time at which it was granted, it fulfilled the conditions laid down in the Regulation adopted pursuant to Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 994/98 [15] and applicable at that time.Article 3
Posamične pomoči, dodeljene ribiški zadrugi ali enemu njenih združenj iz naslova sheme iz člena 1(1) te odločbe, niso pomoči, če v trenutku dodelitve izpolnjujejo pogoje, določene z uredbo, sprejeto na podlagi člena 2 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 994/98 [15] in veljavno v tistem času.Člen 3
Individual aid granted under the scheme referred to in Article 1 of this Decision which, at the time at which it was granted, fulfilled the conditions laid down by a regulation adopted pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 994/98 or by any other approved aid scheme is compatible with the common market up to the maximum intensity applicable to that type of aid.
Posamične pomoči, dodeljene iz naslova sheme iz člena 1(1) te odločbe, ki so v trenutku dodelitve izpolnjevale pogoje, določene z uredbo, sprejeto na podlagi člena 1 Uredbe (ES) št. 994/98, ali katero koli drugo potrjeno shemo pomoči, so združljive s skupnim trgom do največje intenzivnosti, ki se uporablja za to vrsto pomoči.
Italy is required to make the beneficiaries repay the incompatible aid referred to in Article 1 granted from 12 November 2005.
Italija je zavezana, da od prejemnikov izterja vračilo nezdružljivih pomoči iz člena 1, dodeljenih po 12. novembru 2005.
Interest shall be paid on the amounts to be repaid, from the date on which they were made available to the beneficiaries until they are actually repaid.
Vsoti, ki se vrne, se prištejejo obresti za obdobje od datuma, ko je bila pomoč dana na voljo prejemnikom, do datuma njenega dejanskega vračila.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [16].
Obresti se izračunajo na podlagi obrestnega računa v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe Komiije (ES) št. 794/2004 [16].
Italy shall cancel all outstanding payments of the aid referred to in Article 1 from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Italija prekliče vsa neporavnana plačila pomoči na podlagi sheme iz člena 1 z dnem sprejetja te odločbe.
Recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 shall be immediate and effective.
Izterjavo pomoči iz člena 1 se opravi takoj in učinkovito.
Italy shall ensure that this Decision is put into effect within four months of the date of its notification.
Italija zagotovi, da se ta odločba izvrši v štirih mesecih od datuma njene priglasitve.
Within two months of notification of this Decision, Italy shall submit the following information:
V dveh mesecih po priglasitvi te odločbe Italija predloži Komisiji naslednje informacije:
the list of the fisheries cooperatives and their consortia which have received aid under Articles 2 and 3 and the total amount received by each of them;
seznam ribiških zadrug in njihovih združenj, ki so prejeli pomoč na podlagi členov 2 in 3, ter skupni znesek, ki ga je prejel vsak od njih;
the total amount (principal and interest) to be recovered from each beneficiary;
skupni znesek (glavnica in obresti), ki ga mora vrniti vsak prejemnik pomoči;
documents demonstrating that the beneficiaries have been ordered to repay the aid.
dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da je bilo prejemniku pomoči naročeno, naj vrne pomoč.
Italy shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures adopted to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Articles 1, 2 and 3 has been completed.
Italija Komisijo obvešča o napredovanju v zvezi s sprejetimi nacionalnimi ukrepi za izvajanje te odločbe, dokler se vračanje pomoči iz členov 1, 2 in 3 ne zaključi.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and those planned to comply with this Decision.
Italija na podlagi enostavne zahteve Komisije takoj predloži vsako informacijo o že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepih za delovanje v skladu s to odločbo.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and interest already recovered from the beneficiaries.
Prav tako zagotovi podrobne informacije o zneskih pomoči in obrestih, ki so jih prejemniki pomoči že vrnili.
Letter published in OJ C 202, 25.8.2006, p. 11.
Dopis, objavljen v UL C 202, 25.8.2006, str. 11.
The effect of acceptance of appropriate measures by a Member State was clearly set out in the judgment in Case C-313/90 Comité International de la Rayonne et des Fibres Synthétiques and Others v Commission [1993] ECR I-1125: ‘… the rules set out in the discipline and accepted by the Member States themselves have the effect, inter alia, of withdrawing from certain aid falling within its scope the authorisation previously granted and hence of classifying it as new aid and subjecting it to the obligation of prior notification.’ (paragraph 35).
Učinek sprejetja ustreznih ukrepov države članice je bil jasno določen v sodbi z dne 24. marca 1993 v zadevi C-313/90, Comité international de la rayonne et des fibres synthétiques in drugi proti Komisiji: „[…] pravila iz predpisov, ki so jih sprejele države članice, imajo v zvezi z določenimi pomočmi s področja uporabe teh predpisov še zlasti učinek odvzema predhodno danega dovoljenja, tako da te pomoči opredelijo za nove in jih podvržejo obveznosti predhodne priglasitve“ (točka 35).
OJ C 229, 14.9.2004, p. 5.
UL C 229 z dne 14.9.2004, str. 5.
Case C-5/89 Commission v Germany [1990] ECR I-3437, paragraph 14; Case C-169/95 Spain v Commission [1997] ECR I-135, paragraph 51, and Case T-55/99 CETM v Commission [2000] ECR II-3207, paragraph 121.
Zadeva C-5/89, Komisija proti Zvezni republiki Nemčiji (1990) Recueil. I-3437, točka 14, in zadeva C-169/95 Kraljevina Španija proti Komisiji (1997) Recueil I-135, točka 51, zadeva T-55/99 CETM proti Komisiji (2000), Recueil II, točka 121.
Case 265/85 Van den Bergh en Jurgens v Commission [1987] ECR 1155, paragraph 44.
1987, Recueil 1155, točka 44.
Case C-311/94 Ijssel-Vliet v Minister van Economische Zaken [1996] ECR I-5023, paragraphs 36 to 44.
Zadeva C-311/94, Ijssel-Vliet Combinatie BV proti Minister van Economische Zaken (1996), Recueil I-5023, točke od 36 do 44.
OJ C 278, 11.11.2005, p. 14.
UL C 278, 11.11.2005, str. 14.
By letter of 3 March 2005, Italy replied to that injunction.
Italija je na to odredbo odgovorila z dopisom z dne 3. marca 2005.
Another letter was subsequently received by the Commission on 12 July 2005.
Dne 12. julija 2005 je Komisija prejela še en dopis.
The Commission could not share Italy’s view, even though it had in fact decided in favour of aid scheme NN 24/98 concerning the scheme laid down by the Decree of 10 February 1998.
Komisija se ne more strinjati s stališčem Italije, čeprav se je dejansko izrekla v korist sheme pomoči NN 24/98 v zvezi s shemo iz odloka z dne 10. februarja 1998.
However, the aid measure which had been analysed by the Commission concerned the implementation of the restructuring plans for the years 1997 to 1999 and, by decision of 11 March 1999, the Commission had pointed out to the Italian authorities that they had to inform the Commission, in accordance with Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty, of any plans to refinance, extend or alter that aid measure.
Vendarle se je ukrep pomoči, ki ga je Komisija preučila, nanašal na izvajanje načrtov za prestrukturiranje v letih od vključno 1997 do vključno 1999, z odločbo z dne 11. marca 1999 pa je Komisija opomnila italijanske oblasti, da ji morajo v skladu s členom 88(3) Pogodbe ES priglasiti osnutek vsakega refinanciranja, podaljšanja ali spremembe tega ukrepa pomoči.
By letter of 21 December 2000, in accordance with point 3.2 of the 2001 Fisheries Guidelines, the Commission proposed, under the appropriate measures mechanism, that Member States amend their existing aid schemes relating to aids in the fishery sector by 1 July 2001 at the latest.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 21. decembra 2000 v skladu s točko 3.2 smernic za ribištvo iz leta 2001 državam članicam v okviru mehanizma ustreznih ukrepov predlagala, naj spremenijo obstoječe sheme pomoči za ribištvo do 1. julija 2001.
The Member States were invited to confirm that they accept that proposal in writing by 1 March 2001 at the latest.
Države članice so bile pozvane, naj dajo pisno soglasje k temu predlogu pred 1. marcem 2001.
Italy did not reply to the Commission’s letter of 21 December 2000.
Italija na dopis Komisije z dne 21. decembra 2000 ni odgovorila.
By letter of 7 May 2001, the Commission drew Italy’s attention to the wording of that letter, informing it that, from that time the Commission considered that Italy’s failure to indicate its disagreement in writing meant that it had accepted the proposal for appropriate measures.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 7. maja 2001 opomnila Italijo na pogoje iz zgoraj navedenega dopisa in jo obvestila, da bo za Komisijo od tistega trenutka naprej odsotnost negativnega odgovora pomenila soglasje k predlogu glede zadevnih ukrepov.
The Commission carried out a preliminary analysis of that aid scheme in the light of both the 2001 and 2004 Fisheries Guidelines.
Komisija je začela predhodno analizo te nezakonite sheme pomoči ob upoštevanju smernic za ribištvo iz leta 2001 in leta 2004.
Pursuant to the second paragraph of point 5.3 of the Guidelines for the examination of State aid to fisheries and aquaculture [7] of 2004 (the 2004 Fisheries Guidelines), those Guidelines are applicable in the case of aid granted from 1 November 2004, whereas for aid granted prior to that date the 2001 Guidelines apply.
V skladu z drugim odstavkom točke 5.3 smernic za pregled državnih pomoči za ribištvo in ribogojstvo [7] iz leta 2004 (v nadaljnjem besedilu smernice za ribištvo iz leta 2004) se te smernice uporabljajo za pomoči, dodeljene po 1. novembru 2004, medtem ko se za pomoči, dodeljene pred tem datumom, uporabljajo smernice iz leta 2001.
The criteria for recognising what constitutes ‘difficulty’ are set out in points 4 to 8 of the 1999 Restructuring Guidelines and in points 9 to 13 of the 2004 Restructuring Guidelines.
Merila za prepoznavo obstoja težav so opisana v točkah od 4 do 8 smernic za prestrukturiranje iz leta 1999 oziroma v točkah od 9 do 13 smernic za prestrukturiranje iz leta 2004.
The Commission observed that the Decree of 10 February 1998 did not serve to check fulfilment of those criteria.
Komisija je menila, da odlok z dne 10. februarja 1998 ni omogočal preverjanja izpolnjevanja teh meril.
For aid granted up to 9 October 2004, the 1999 Restructuring Guidelines apply and for aid granted from 10 October 2004, the 2004 Restructuring Guidelines apply.
Za pomoči, dodeljene do 9. oktobra 2004, se uporabljajo smernice za prestrukturiranje iz leta 1999, za tiste, dodeljene po 10. oktobru 2004, pa smernice za prestrukturiranje iz leta 2004.
It is also important to recall that, in the specific case of firms whose principal activity is fishing at sea, the Fisheries Guidelines add that that aid may be granted only when a plan designed to reduce fleet capacity has been submitted to the Commission.
Pomembno je še poudariti, da za poseben primer podjetij, katerih glavna dejavnost je morsko ribištvo, smernice za ribištvo dodajajo, da se sme te pomoči dodeliti samo, če je bil Komisiji predstavljen načrt za zmanjšanje zmogljivosti flote.
The same conditions, in accordance with point 82(a), are restated in points 34 to 37 of the 2004 Restructuring Guidelines.
Enaki pogoji, v skladu s točko 82(a), so določeni v točkah od 34 do 37 smernic za prestrukturiranje iz leta 2004.
According to those provisions, the restructuring plan must, inter alia, restore the long-term viability of the firm within a reasonable timescale and on the basis of realistic assumptions, it must describe the circumstances that led to the firm’s difficulties and must provide for a turnaround that will enable the firm, after completing its restructuring, to cover all its costs; the grant of the aid is possible only if the restructuring plan submitted contains all of those elements.
V skladu s temi določbami mora načrt za prestrukturiranje zlasti omogočiti ponovno vzpostavitev dolgoročne donosnosti podjetja v razumnem času in na podlagi realističnih predpostavk, opisati mora okoliščine, ki so podjetju povzročile težave, in predlagati tako preoblikovanje, ki bo podjetju po prestrukturiranju omogočilo poravnavanje vseh lastnih stroškov; dodelitev pomoči je mogoča le, če predstavljeni načrt za prestrukturiranje vsebuje vse te elemente.
However, Article 14(1) states that ‘the Commission shall not require recovery of the aid if this would be contrary to a general principle of Community law.’
Vendar navedeni prvi odstavek poudarja, da „Komisija ne zahteva vračila pomoči, če bi bilo to v nasprotju s splošnim načelom prava Skupnosti“.
In this case, it is appropriate to examine whether a general principle of Community law, such as the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations or legal certainty, might apply to preclude the recovery of the unlawful and incompatible aid from the beneficiaries.
Dobro je preveriti, ali bi se v tem primeru splošno načelo prava Skupnosti, kot je načelo zaupanja v pravo oziroma pravno varnost, lahko uporabilo z namenom izključitve vrnitve nezakonitih in nezdružljivih pomoči prejemnikov.
In order to adapt existing aid in line with the new 2001 Fisheries Guidelines, the Commission proposed that Member States amend their existing aid schemes relating to aids in the fishery sector by 1 July 2001 at the latest.
Komisija je za prilagoditev obstoječih pomoči novim smernicam za ribištvo iz leta 2001 predlagala državam članicam, naj spremenijo obstoječe sheme pomoči za ribiški sektor pred 1. julijem 2001.
The case-law [13] confirmed that such a proposal set out in the Guidelines is one element of the regular, periodic cooperation with which the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, is to keep under constant review the systems of aid existing and propose to them any appropriate measures required.
Sodna praksa [13] je potrdila, da tak predlog iz smernic pomeni element rednega in jasnega sodelovanja, v okviru katerega Komisija z državami članicami redno preverja vse obstoječe sheme pomoči in državam članicam predlaga ustrezne ukrepe.
In the Commission’s opinion, the measure was existing aid only up to 30 June 2001.
Po mnenju Komisije je bil ukrep obstoječa pomoč le do 30. junija 2001.
In that respect, as stated above, the Commission observes that Italy, under the appropriate measures mechanism, accepted the proposal to amend their existing aid schemes in the fisheries and aquaculture sector after the adoption of both the 2001 Fisheries Guidelines and the 2004 Fisheries Guidelines.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, Komisija v zvezi s tem meni, da je Italija v okviru mehanizma ustreznih ukrepov sprejela predlog za spremembo shem pomoči, ki so obstajale v ribištvu in ribogojstvu, tako po sprejetju smernic za ribištvo iz leta 2001 kot smernic za ribištvo iz leta 2004.
From 1 July 2001 the aid therefore became new aid, in view of the fact that it should have been adapted in line with the new 2001 Fisheries Guidelines.
Od 1. julija 2001 je pomoč torej postala nova pomoč, ker bi jo bilo treba prilagoditi novim smernicam za ribištvo iz leta 2001.
Article 26 stipulates that the Commission must publish ‘a summary notice of the decisions which it takes pursuant to …. Article 18 in conjunction with Article 19(1).’
Člen 26 dejansko določa, da mora Komisija objaviti „povzetek odločb, sprejetih na podlagi […] člena 18 v povezavi s členom 19(1)“.
Under Article 18 of that Regulation, ‘where the Commission … concludes that the existing aid scheme is not, or is no longer, compatible with the common market, it shall issue a recommendation proposing appropriate measures to the Member State concerned.’
Na podlagi člena 18 navedene Uredbe, „če Komisija […] ugotovi, da veljavna shema pomoči ni ali ni več združljiva s skupnim trgom, izda priporočilo, v katerem zadevni državi članici predlaga ustrezne ukrepe“.
The Commission did not publish in the Official Journal of the European Communities each Member State’s acceptance of the appropriate measures it proposed for the implementation of the new 2001 Fisheries Guidelines.
Komisija sprejetja ustreznih ukrepov, ki jih je predlagala za izvršitev novih smernic za ribištvo iz leta 2001, s strani vsake države članice ni objavila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
It is therefore difficult for the Commission to prove that the beneficiaries were correctly informed of the acceptance of the Italian Government and the change in the status of the aid which resulted.
Komisija zato le stežka dokaže, da so bili prejemniki pravilno obveščeni o sprejetju s strani italijanske vlade in posledični spremembi statusa pomoči.
on the European Year of Voluntary Activities Promoting Active Citizenship (2011)
o evropskem letu prostovoljnih dejavnosti za spodbujanje aktivnega državljanstva (2011)
The Treaty establishes citizenship of the European Union (EU), which complements national citizenship of the respective Member States and is an important element in strengthening and safeguarding the process of European integration.
Pogodba uvaja državljanstvo Evropske unije (EU), ki dopolnjuje nacionalno državljanstvo zadevnih držav članic in je pomemben element krepitve in varovanja procesa evropske integracije.
Encouraging active citizenship is a key element in strengthening cohesion and the development of democracy.
Spodbujanje aktivnega državljanstva je bistvenega pomena za krepitev povezanosti državljanov in razvoj demokracije.
The European Year of Voluntary Activities promoting active citizenship will contribute to showing that volunteering is one of the key dimensions of active citizenship and democracy, putting European values such as solidarity and non-discrimination into action and as such contributing to the harmonious development of European societies.
„Evropsko leto prostovoljnih dejavnosti za spodbujanje aktivnega državljanstva“ bo pomagalo ponazoriti, da je prostovoljstvo ena od ključnih razsežnosti aktivnega državljanstva in demokracije, s katero se uresničujejo evropske vrednote, kot sta solidarnost in nediskriminacija, in ki prispeva k usklajenemu razvoju evropskih družb.
Voluntary activities constitute a rich learning experience, enable the development of social skills and competences and contribute to solidarity.
Prostovoljne dejavnosti prinašajo bogato učno izkušnjo, omogočajo razvoj družbenih veščin in kompetenc ter prispevajo k solidarnosti.
Actions carried out by volunteers of all ages are crucial to the development of democracy, one of the founding principles of the EU.
Delo, ki ga opravljajo prostovoljci vseh starosti, je ključno za razvoj demokracije, ki je eno temeljnih načel EU.
Voluntary activities have the potential to contribute to the well-being of individuals and the harmonious development of European societies.
Prostovoljne dejavnosti lahko prispevajo k blaginji posameznikov in usklajenemu razvoju evropskih družb.
Having due regard to the particularities of the situation in each Member State and all forms of volunteering, the term ‘voluntary activities’ refers to all types of voluntary activity, whether formal, non-formal or informal which are undertaken of a person’s own free will, choice and motivation, and is without concern for financial gain.
Ob ustreznem upoštevanju posebnih razmer v vsaki državi članici in vseh oblik prostovoljstva pomeni izraz „prostovoljne dejavnosti“ vse oblike prostovoljnih dejavnosti, bodisi formalne, neformalne ali priložnostne, ki jih oseba opravlja po svoji svobodni volji in izbiri in na podlagi lastne motiviranosti ter je ne zanima finančni dobiček.
They benefit the individual volunteer, communities and society as a whole.
Takšne dejavnosti koristijo posameznemu prostovoljcu, skupnostim in družbi kot celoti.
They are also a vehicle for individuals and associations to address human, social, intergenerational or environmental needs and concerns, and are often carried out in support of a non-profit organisation or community-based initiative.
Z njimi se lahko posamezniki in združenja odzovejo na človeške, družbene, medgeneracijske ali okoljske potrebe in skrbi, pogosto pa so namenjene podpori neprofitnih pobud organizacij ali skupnosti.
Voluntary activities do not replace professional, paid employment opportunities but add value to society.
Prostovoljne dejavnosti ne nadomeščajo poklicnih, plačanih zaposlitvenih priložnosti, temveč dodajajo vrednost družbi.
In fast-changing societies there is a need to ensure effective support measures for voluntary activities to allow more people to engage in voluntary activities.
V hitro spreminjajočih se družbah je treba zagotoviti učinkovite podporne ukrepe za prostovoljne dejavnosti, da bi lahko pri njihovem izvajanju sodelovalo več ljudi.
It is therefore important to support peer learning and the exchange and development of good practices at local, regional, national and Community levels.
Zato je pomembno podpirati vzajemno učenje ter izmenjavo in razvoj dobrih praks na lokalni, regionalni in nacionalni ravni ter na ravneh Skupnosti.
The 1997 Intergovernmental Conference adopted Declaration 38 on voluntary activities, which was attached to the Final Act of the Treaty of Amsterdam and recognises the important contribution made by voluntary service activities to developing social solidarity.
Na medvladni konferenci leta 1997 je bila sprejeta Deklaracija 38 o prostovoljnih dejavnostih, ki je bila priložena Sklepni listini Amsterdamske pogodbe in priznava pomemben prispevek prostovoljnih dejavnosti k razvoju družbene solidarnosti.
In its Communication of June 1997 on promoting the role of voluntary organisations and foundations in Europe, the Commission emphasised three aspects of voluntary organisations and foundations: the economic aspect of creating jobs; the social aspect of helping to define social policies and thereby contributing to social progress; and the political aspect, fostering democracy, citizenship and civic participation.
Komisija je v Sporočilu iz junija 1997 o podpiranju vloge prostovoljnih organizacij in ustanov v Evropi poudarila tri vidike prostovoljskih organizacij in ustanov: gospodarski vidik v smislu odpiranja delovnih mest, socialni vidik kot prispevek k opredelitvi socialne politike in s tem k družbenemu napredku ter politični vidik glede krepitve demokracije, državljanstva in državljanske udeležbe.