natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Gabon Airlines has however responded adequately and in a timely fashion to enquiries by the civil aviation authority of France regarding the safety aspect of its operation.
Vendar se je prevoznik Gabon Airlines primerno in pravočasno odzval na preiskave uprave za civilno letalstvo Francije glede varnostnega vidika svojih dejavnosti.
The competent authorities of Gabon indicated that the aircraft is currently grounded for base maintenance purposes and that they intend to verify the satisfactory closure of these findings before the aircraft with registration marks TR-LHP is eventually returned to service.
Pristojni organi Gabona so navedli, da ima zrakoplov trenutno prepoved letenja zaradi vzdrževanja v bazi in da nameravajo preveriti, če so bile pomanjkljivosti zadovoljivo odpravljene, preden bi se zrakoplov z registrsko oznako TR-LHP vrnil v uporabo.
In view of the above, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Gabon Airlines should remain in Annex B, and that this Annex should be amended to reflect the situation of the aircraft with registration marks TR-LHP and ensure the current level of operations into the Community is preserved.
Glede na navedeno se na podlagi splošnih meril ocenjuje, da bi moral prevoznik Gabon Airlines ostati v Prilogi B in da bi bilo treba to prilogo spremeniti, da bi odražala stanje zrakoplova z registrsko oznako TR-LHP ter da bi se ohranila trenutna raven opravljanja letov v Skupnost.
Afrijet certified in Gabon was allowed since July 2008 to operate in the Community only a number of aircraft of type Falcon 50 with registration marks TR-LGV and TR-LGY as well as aircraft of type Falcon 900 registered TR-AFJ under the conditions presented in the recital (15) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2008 [16].
Prevoznik Afrijet, certificiran v Gabonu, je imel od julija 2008 dovoljenje za opravljanje letov v Skupnosti samo z zrakoplovoma vrste Falcon 50 z registrskima oznakama TR-LGV in TR-LGY ter zrakoplovom Falcon 900 z registrsko oznako TR-AFJ pod pogoji iz uvodne izjave (15) Uredbe (ES) št. 715/2008 [16].
Since then, there is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Afrijet.
Od takrat obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih prevoznika Afrijet.
These deficiencies have been identified by France during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [17].
Te pomanjkljivosti je med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [17], odkrila Francija.
Afrijet has however responded adequately and in a timely fashion to enquiries by the civil aviation authority of France regarding the safety aspect of its operation.
Vendar se je prevoznik Afrijet primerno in pravočasno odzval na preiskave uprave za civilno letalstvo Francije glede varnostnega vidika svojih dejavnosti.
The Commission took note that Afrijet was subject to a recertification audit by the competent authorities of Gabon in January 2009.
Komisija je ugotovila, da so pristojni organi Gabona januarja 2009 pri prevozniku Afrijet opravili revizijo z namenom ponovnega certificiranja.
After the verification of closure of all findings arising from this audit, the carrier was re-issued a new AOC in February 2009, which includes a second aircraft of type Falcon 900 with registration marks TR-AFR.
Po preverjanju, če so bile odpravljene vse pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljene med to revizijo, je bilo letalskemu prevozniku februarja 2009 izdano novo spričevalo, ki vključuje drugi zrakoplov vrste Falcon 900 z registrsko oznako TR-AFR.
In view of the above, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Afrijet should remain in Annex B and that this Annex should be amended to reflect the change of the AOC and ensure that the current level of operations into the Community is preserved.
Glede na navedeno se na podlagi splošnih meril ocenjuje, da bi moral prevoznik Afrijet ostati v Prilogi B in da bi bilo treba to prilogo spremeniti, da bi odražala spremembe spričevala letalskega prevoznika ter da bi se ohranila trenutna raven opravljanja letov v Skupnost.
The Commission also noted that SN2AG was subject to a recertification audit by the competent authorities of Gabon in February 2009.
Komisija je tudi ugotovila, da so pristojni organi Gabona februarja 2009 pri prevozniku SN2AG opravili revizijo z namenom ponovnega certificiranja.
After the verification of closure of all findings arising from this audit, the carrier was re-issued a new AOC in February 2009.
Po preverjanju, če so bile odpravljene vse pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljene med to revizijo, je bilo letalskemu prevozniku februarja 2009 izdano novo spričevalo.
There is verified evidence that certain safety requirements of ICAO have not yet been complied with.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi, da se nekatere varnostne zahteve ICAO še vedno ne upoštevajo.
For instance, at the time of the hearing the carrier has not yet effectively implemented the required Flight Data Monitoring for the aircraft of type Fokker 28-0100 (Fokker 100).
V času zaslišanja prevoznik na primer še ni učinkovito izvedel spremljanja podatkov, zbranih med letom, ki se zahteva za zrakoplov vrste Fokker 28-0100 (Fokker 100).
There is verified evidence of a lack of transparency and timely communication on the part of SN2AG in response to enquiries by the Commission.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o pomanjkanju preglednosti in pravočasnega obveščanja s strani prevoznika SN2AG v odgovor na poizvedbe Komisije.
stated it has not been subject to any reports showing serious deficiencies identified by ramp inspections carried out under the Safety Assessment of Foreign Aircraft (SAFA) programme, whilst several deficiencies had actually been identified by France during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [18].
Prevoznik SN2AG je navedel, da ni bil predmet poročil, ki kažejo na resne pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljene med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi v okviru programa presoje varnosti tujih zrakoplovov (SAFA), čeprav je Francija med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi v okviru programa SAFA [18], odkrila številne pomanjkljivosti.
Consequently, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that SN2AG should remain in Annex A.
Zato se na podlagi splošnih meril ocenjuje, da bi moral prevoznik SN2AG ostati v Prilogi A.
Nevertheless, the Commission is ready to re-examine the situation of this carrier in the light of any new developments providing sufficient evidence that the safety deficiencies have been addressed.
Vendar je Komisija pripravljena ponovno proučiti stanje tega prevoznika na podlagi kakršne koli spremembe, ki bi zagotovila zadostne dokaze, da so bile varnostne pomanjkljivosti odpravljene.
Overall safety oversight of air carriers from Gabon
Splošen nadzor nad varnostjo letalskih prevoznikov iz Gabona
The Commission drew the attention of the competent authorities of Gabon to the fact that, despite increased oversight activities of these authorities, monitoring of the performance of air carriers licensed in Gabon keep showing disquieting results in ramp inspections.
Komisija je pristojne organe Gabona opozorila, da kljub njihovemu okrepljenemu izvajanju nadzora rezultati preverjanj na ploščadi pri spremljanju delovanja prevoznikov, ki jim je bila v Gabonu izdana licenca, še vedno niso zadovoljivi.
The competent authorities of Gabon were invited to provide clarifications and to take the necessary measures, where appropriate.
Pristojni organi Gabona so bili pozvani, da to pojasnijo in po potrebi sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe.
The Commission encourages the efforts of the competent authorities of Gabon to reform the civil aviation system and in particular the on-going recertification of all airlines to ensure full compliance with ICAO safety standards.
Komisija spodbuja prizadevanja pristojnih organov Gabona za reformo sistema civilnega letalstva in zlasti ponovno certificiranje vseh letalskih družb, ki je v teku, da bi se zagotovilo polno upoštevanje varnostnih standardov ICAO.
The Commission is ready to consider a visit on site in due time to verify the progress effectively accomplished.
Komisija je pripravljena razmisliti o obisku na kraju samem, da bi pravočasno preverila uspešno doseženi napredek.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Motor Sich certified in Ukraine.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih prevoznika Motor Sich, certificiranega v Ukrajini.
These deficiencies have been identified by France and an ECAC state (Turkey) during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [19].
Te pomanjkljivosti sta med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [19], odkrili Francija in ena od držav ECAC (Turčija).
The competent authorities of Turkey decided to impose an immediate operating ban of this carrier on 27 November 2008.
Pristojni organi Turčije so se 27. novembra 2008 odločili za takojšnjo uvedbo prepovedi opravljanja letov za tega prevoznika.
Motor Sich responded to the enquiry by the civil aviation authority of Turkey by indicating their decision to stop the operation of aircraft of type AN-24 to this State, which they did.
Prevoznik Motor Sich je v svojem odgovoru na preiskavo uprave za civilno letalstvo Turčije napovedal svojo odločitev, da namerava ukiniti lete zrakoplova vrste AN-24 v to državo, kar je tudi storil.
Motor Sich responded in a timely fashion to an enquiry by the civil aviation authority of France stating what corrective actions had been undertaken by the company following the ramp check carried out on 12 March 2008 France.
Prevoznik Motor Sich se je pravočasno odzval na preiskavo uprave za civilno letalstvo Francije in je navedel korekcijske ukrepe, ki jih je sprejel po preverjanju na ploščadi, ki ga je 12. marca 2008 opravila Francija.
However, this response was not adequate as there has been no supporting evidence material submitted by the carrier.
Vendar ta odziv ni bil primeren, saj prevoznik ni predložil podpornega dokaznega gradiva.
The Commission received information from the competent authorities of Turkey that after non-scheduled inspection of the operator, the decision was taken by the competent authorities of Ukraine to revoke the AOC of this operator.
Komisija je od pristojnih organov Turčije prejela informacije, da so se pristojni organi Ukrajine po nenapovedanem inšpekcijskem pregledu pri tem letalskem prevozniku odločili razveljaviti njegovo spričevalo letalskega prevoznika.
These authorities decided afterwards to authorise the continuation of the operations of Motor Sich to this country with some limitations on the operations of AN-24.
Ti organi so se nato odločili, da prevozniku Motor Sich dovolijo nadaljnje opravljanje letov v to državo z nekaterimi omejitvami pri dejavnostih zrakoplova vrste AN-24.
The competent authorities of Ukraine responded on 16 March 2009 to an enquiry by the Commission regarding the safety oversight of Motor Sich, stating that the AOC of the carrier was revoked on 22 January and that, upon completion of corrective actions by the carrier, the State aviation Administration authorised the continuation of operations except for the aircraft of type AN-24 on its fleet.
Pristojni organi Ukrajine so se 16. marca 2009 odzvali na preiskavo Komisije glede nadzora nad varnostjo prevoznika Motor Sich, pri čemer so navedli, da je bilo spričevalo tega letalskega prevoznika razveljavljeno 22. januarja in da mu je potem, ko je prevoznik izvedel korekcijske ukrepe, državna uprava za letalstvo dovolila nadaljnje opravljanje dejavnosti, z izjemo zrakoplova vrste AN-24 iz njegove flote.
No date has been stated regarding such issuance of an AOC with limitations neither any evidence of inspection of the company to ensure that the relevant safety requirements are respected for any part of the fleet.
V zvezi s to izdajo spričevala letalskega prevoznika z omejitvami ni bi naveden noben datum, niti niso bili predloženi dokazi za inšpekcijski pregled prevoznika, da bi se zagotovilo upoštevanje ustreznih varnostnih zahtev za celotno floto.
Finally, according to the aforementioned correspondence of the State Aviation Administration, these authorities renewed the AOC allowing the carrier to operate with AN-24 after performing inspections with positive results demonstrating that the carrier had eliminated deficiencies on this aircraft.
Poleg tega so, kot je razvidno iz navedene korespondence državne uprave za letalstvo, ti organi obnovili spričevalo letalskega prevoznika in mu tako omogočili opravljanje letov z zrakoplovom vrste AN-24, potem ko so opravili inšpekcijske preglede, iz izsledkov katerih je razvidno, da je prevoznik odpravil pomanjkljivosti v zvezi s tem zrakoplovom.
The information provided in this correspondence is not considered to be an adequate response as the information transmitted therein does not correspond to the information transmitted by the competent authorities of Ukraine on 2 February 2009, according to which the AOC of Motor Sich Airlines was issued on 8 November 2008 with validity until 8 November 2010 and the operation specifications were issued on 23 December 2008 with validity until 8 November 2010.
Informacije iz te korespondence se ne štejejo za primeren odziv, saj ne ustrezajo informacijam, ki so jih pristojni organi Ukrajine predložili 2. februarja 2009, v skladu s katerimi je bilo spričevalo letalskega prevoznika Motor Sich Airlines izdano 8. novembra 2008 z veljavnostjo do 8. novembra 2010, specifikacije dejavnosti pa so bile izdane 23. decembra 2008 z veljavnostjo do 8. novembra 2010.
In view of the above, the Commission considers that the competent authorities of Ukraine have shown an insufficient ability to oversee the operations of the air carrier in accordance with their obligations under the Chicago Convention.
Glede na navedeno Komisija meni, da pristojni organi Ukrajine niso pokazali dovolj sposobnosti za nadzor nad dejavnostmi letalskega prevoznika v skladu z njihovimi obveznostmi iz Čikaške konvencije.
On the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Motor Sich has not shown the ability to take all the required measures to conform to relevant safety standards and should therefore be included in Annex A.
Na podlagi splošnih meril se ocenjuje, da prevoznik Motor Sich ni pokazal sposobnosti za izvedbo vseh zahtevanih ukrepov, da bi izpolnjeval ustrezne varnostne standarde, zato ga je treba vključiti v Prilogo A.
The carrier Ukraine Cargo Airways (UCA) requested to be heard by the Commission and the Air Safety Committee, and did so on 24 March 2009.
Prevoznik Ukraine Cargo Airways (UCA) je zaprosil za zaslišanje pred Komisijo in Odborom za varnost v zračnem prometu in je bil zaslišan 24. marca 2009.
On the basis of documentation submitted by the company to the Commission on 16 March 2009 there is evidence that the company had undertaken measures to redress previously detected deficiencies on its aircraft operated in the Community.
Na podlagi dokumentacije, ki jo je letalski prevoznik 16. marca 2009 predložil Komisiji, obstajajo dokazi, da je sprejel ukrepe za odpravo predhodno ugotovljenih varnostnih pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z zrakoplovom, ki opravlja lete v Skupnosti.
According to the information presented by the company, UCA has been audited by the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine in November 2008.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih predložil prevoznik UCA, je državna uprava za letalstvo Ukrajine novembra 2008 pri tem prevozniku izvedla revizijo.
Furthermore, the carrier has stated in its presentation to the Commission and the Air Safety Committee that it has received written confirmation from various Member States that the safety deficiencies detected by the inspecting authorities of these Member States had been adequately addressed by UCA.
Poleg tega je prevoznik UCA v svoji predstavitvi Komisiji in Odboru za varnost v zračnem prometu navedel, da je od številnih držav članic prejel pisno potrditev, da je ustrezno odpravil varnostne pomanjkljivosti, ki so jih ugotovili inšpekcijski organi teh držav članic.
However, with the exception of one Member State concerning the operation of one aircraft of type AN-12 which was removed from the AOC, the statements of UCA were not affirmed by the other Member States concerned.
Vendar z izjemo ene države članice, pri kateri je šlo za lete enega zrakoplova vrste AN-12, ki je bil umaknjen s spričevala letalskega prevoznika, druge zadevne države članice niso potrdile izjav prevoznika UCA.
The Commission considers that in order to fully assess the ability of the carrier to put in place an appropriate corrective action plan and to implement it effectively it is necessary to perform an on-site visit.
Komisija meni, da je treba izvesti obisk na kraju samem, če se želi v celoti oceniti sposobnosti prevoznika za vzpostavitev primernega načrta korekcijskih ukrepov in njegovo uspešno izvedbo.
Unfortunately such a visit could not take place before the meeting of the Air Safety Committee on 24 March 2009 due to a lack of cooperation of the competent authorities of Ukraine.
Na žalost zaradi nezadostnega sodelovanja pristojnih organov Ukrajine takega obiska ni bilo mogoče organizirati pred sestankom Odbora za varnost v zračnem prometu 24. marca 2009.
During the meeting of the Air Safety Committee on 24 March 2009, the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine expressed its willingness to receive this visit by the Commission and Member States.
Med sestankom Odbora za varnost v zračnem prometu 24. marca 2009 je državna uprava za letalstvo Ukrajine izrazila, da je pripravljena sprejeti obisk Komisije in držav članic.
The Commission will decide any modification of the operating ban imposed on the carrier on the basis of evidence gathered during this future visit.
Komisija se bo na podlagi dokazov, zbranih med tem prihodnjim obiskom, odločila o morebitni spremembi prepovedi opravljanja letov, ki velja za prevoznika.
On the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that, at this stage, this carrier cannot be removed from Annex A.
Na podlagi splošnih meril se ocenjuje, da prevoznika zaenkrat ni mogoče umakniti iz Priloge A.
The carrier Ukrainian Mediterranean Airlines (UMAir) requested to be heard by the Commission and the Air Safety Committee and did so on 24 March 2009.
Prevoznik Ukrainian Mediterranean Airlines (UMAir) je zaprosil za zaslišanje pred Komisijo in Odborom za varnost v zračnem prometu in je bil zaslišan 24. marca 2009.
On the basis of documentation submitted by the company to the Commission on 16 October 2008, there is evidence that the company had undertaken measures to redress previously detected deficiencies on its aircraft operated in the Community.
Na podlagi dokumentacije, ki jo je letalski prevoznik 16. oktobra 2008 predložil Komisiji, obstajajo dokazi, da je sprejel ukrepe za odpravo predhodno ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z zrakoplovom, ki opravlja lete v Skupnosti.
Furthermore, the carrier has stated in its presentation to the Commission and the Air Safety Committee that it has implemented the necessary measures to resolve all safety deficiencies which had led to the imposition of the operating ban in September 2007.
Poleg tega je ta prevoznik v svoji predstavitvi Komisiji in Odboru za varnost v zračnem prometu navedel, da je izvedel ukrepe, potrebne za odpravo vseh varnostnih pomanjkljivosti, zaradi katerih je bila septembra 2007 uvedena prepoved opravljanja letov.
The Commission will decide any modification of the operating ban imposed on the carrier on the basis of evidence gathered during this visit.
Komisija se bo na podlagi dokazov, zbranih med tem obiskom, odločila o morebitni spremembi prepovedi opravljanja letov, ki velja za prevoznika.
The Commission drew the attention of the competent authorities of Ukraine to the fact that, despite increased oversight activities of these authorities, monitoring of the performance of air carriers licensed in Ukraine keep showing disquieting results in ramp inspections.
Komisija je pristojne organe Ukrajine opozorila, da kljub njihovemu okrepljenemu izvajanju nadzora rezultati preverjanj na ploščadi pri spremljanju delovanja prevoznikov, ki jim je bila v Ukrajini izdana licenca, še vedno niso zadovoljivi.
During the meeting of the Air Safety Committee in November 2008, the competent authorities of Ukraine were invited to provide clarifications and to take the necessary measures; also, these authorities had agreed to be subject to a safety assessment to be organised by the Commission in association with Member States.
Med sestankom Odbora za varnost v zračnem prometu novembra 2008 so bili pristojni organi Ukrajine pozvani, da to pojasnijo in sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe, poleg tega so se ti organi strinjali, da se pri njih izvede presoja varnosti, ki jo organizira Komisija skupaj z državami članicami.
However, the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine did not submit to the Commission the progress report on the implementation of the corrective action plan put in place to enhance and reinforce the exercise of safety oversight in the Ukraine, which it is required to submit on a 3-month basis as per Regulation (EC) No 715/2008 [20].
Vendar državna uprava za letalstvo Ukrajine Komisiji ni predložila poročila o napredku pri izvajanju načrta korekcijskih ukrepov, uvedenega zaradi okrepitve in izboljšanja nadzora letalske varnosti v Ukrajini, ki ga mora v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 715/2008 [20] predložiti vsake tri mesece.
Also, the competent authorities showed a lack of cooperation in the preparation of the assessment visit as shown by the absence of submission of the required documentation for airworthiness and the refusal of the visit programme proposed by the Commission.
Pristojni organi so tudi pomanjkljivo sodelovali pri pripravi tega obiska za presojo, saj niso predložili zahtevane dokumentacije za plovnost in so zavrnili program misije, ki ga je predlagala Komisija.
Consequently, the Commission had to cancel the safety assessment visit which was foreseen from 9 to 13 February 2009.
Zato je morala Komisija odpovedati obisk za presojo varnosti, ki je bil predviden med 9. in 13. februarjem 2009.
The Commission takes note of the statements of the competent authorities of Ukraine agreeing to receive a joint visit of the Commission, Member States and EASA and reaffirming their readiness to cooperate for the successful organisation of such safety assessment to demonstrate their ability to carry out the oversight of all air carriers licensed in Ukraine in full compliance with applicable ICAO requirements.
Komisija je seznanjena z izjavami pristojnih organov Ukrajine, ki so se strinjali, da sprejmejo skupni obisk Komisije, držav članic in EASA, ter ponovno poudarili svojo pripravljenost sodelovati pri uspešni organizaciji take presoje varnosti, da bi dokazali svojo sposobnost za izvajanje nadzora nad vsemi letalskimi prevozniki, ki jim je bila v Ukrajini izdana licenca, v popolni skladnosti z veljavnimi zahtevami ICAO.
A team of European experts conducted a fact-finding mission to the Kingdom of Thailand from 10 to 13 March 2009 to obtain factual information about the current safety level of the operating standards of the carrier Bangkok Airways, as well as on oversight activities conducted by the Thai Department of Civil Aviation (DCA) on the air carrier.
Skupina evropskih strokovnjakov je med 10. in 13. marcem 2009 v Kraljevini Tajski izvedla misijo za ugotavljanje dejstev, da bi dobila dejanske informacije glede trenutne stopnje varnosti standardov letenja prevoznika Bangkok Airways ter glede dejavnosti nadzora, ki jih je v zvezi s tem letalskim prevoznikom izvedel tajski oddelek za civilno letalstvo.
In particular, purpose of the mission has been to determine if any aircraft of the carrier are being operated by the carrier Siem Reap Airways International, licensed by the competent authorities of the Kingdom of Cambodia, and which has been included in Annex A of the Community list by Commission Regulation (EC) 1131/2008 of 14 November 2008 [21].
Namen misije je bil zlasti ugotoviti, če katerega koli od zrakoplovov prevoznika upravlja prevoznik Siem Reap Airways International, ki so mu dovoljenje izdali pristojni organi Kraljevine Kambodže in ki je bil z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1131/2008 z dne 14. novembra 2008 [21] vključen v Prilogo A seznama Skupnosti.