natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
where the creditor submits to the jurisdiction of the courts of that other Member State pursuant to Article 5;
če se upravičenec v skladu s členom 5 spusti v postopek pred sodiščem te druge države članice;
where the competent authority in the 2007 Hague Convention Contracting State of origin cannot, or refuses to, exercise jurisdiction to modify the decision or give a new decision; or
če pristojni organ v državi izvora, ki je država pogodbenica Haaške konvencije iz leta 2007, ne more sprejeti pristojnosti za spremembo sodne odločbe ali izdajo nove odločbe ali to pristojnost zavrne, ali
where the decision given in the 2007 Hague Convention Contracting State of origin cannot be recognised or declared enforceable in the Member State where proceedings to modify the decision or to have a new decision given are contemplated.
če se sodna odločba, izdana v državi izvora, ki je država pogodbenica Haaške konvencije iz leta 2007, ne more priznati ali razglasiti za izvršljivo v državi članici, v kateri se preučuje možnost postopka za novo ali spremenjeno odločbo.
Seising of a court
Začetek postopka
For the purposes of this Chapter, a court shall be deemed to be seised:
Za namene tega poglavja se šteje, da se postopek pred sodiščem začne:
at the time when the document instituting the proceedings or an equivalent document is lodged with the court, provided that the claimant has not subsequently failed to take the steps he was required to take to have service effected on the defendant; or
v trenutku, ko je pisanje, s katerim se začne postopek ali enakovredno pisanjevloženo na sodišču, pod pogojem da tožeča stranka pozneje ni opustila dejanj, ki bi jih morala opraviti v zvezi z vročitvijo pisanja toženi stranki, ali
if the document has to be served before being lodged with the court, at the time when it is received by the authority responsible for service, provided that the claimant has not subsequently failed to take the steps he was required to take to have the document lodged with the court.
če je treba pisanje vročiti še pred vložitvijo na sodišče, v trenutku, ko ga prejme organ, ki je odgovoren za vročitev, pod pogojem da tožeča stranka pozneje ni opustila dejanj, ki bi jih morala opraviti v zvezi z vložitvijo pisanja na sodišče.
Examination as to jurisdiction
Preizkus pristojnosti
Where a court of a Member State is seised of a case over which it has no jurisdiction under this Regulation it shall declare of its own motion that it has no jurisdiction.
Če se pred sodiščem države članice začne postopek v zadevi, za katero to sodišče po tej uredbi ni pristojno, se po uradni dolžnosti izreče za nepristojno.
Examination as to admissibility
Preizkus dopustnosti
Where a defendant habitually resident in a State other than the Member State where the action was brought does not enter an appearance, the court with jurisdiction shall stay the proceedings so long as it is not shown that the defendant has been able to receive the document instituting the proceedings or an equivalent document in sufficient time to enable him to arrange for his defence, or that all necessary steps have been taken to this end.
Če se tožena stranka, ki nima običajnega prebivališča v državi, v kateri proti njej poteka postopek, ne spusti v postopek, pristojno sodišče zadrži postopek, dokler se ne ugotovi, ali je bilo toženi stranki omogočeno prejeti listino o začetku postopka ali enakovredno listino pravočasno, da je lahko pripravila obrambo, ali da je bilo za to storjeno vse potrebno.
Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 shall apply instead of the provisions of paragraph 1 of this Article if the document instituting the proceedings or an equivalent document had to be transmitted from one Member State to another pursuant to that Regulation.
Namesto določbe odstavka 1 tega člena se uporabi člen 19 Uredbe (ES) št. 1393/2007, če je morala država članica v skladu z navedeno uredbo poslati listino o začetku postopka ali enakovredno listino drugi državi članici.
Where the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 are not applicable, Article 15 of the Hague Convention of 15 November 1965 on the service abroad of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters shall apply if the document instituting the proceedings or an equivalent document had to be transmitted abroad pursuant to that Convention.
Če se določbe Uredbe (ES) št. 1393/2007 ne uporabljajo, se uporabi člen 15 Haaške konvencije z dne 15. novembra 1965 o vročitvi sodnih in zunajsodnih listin v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah v tujini, če je bilo treba listino o začetku postopka ali enakovredno listino v skladu s to konvencijo vročiti v tujini.
Lis pendens
Litispendenca
Where proceedings involving the same cause of action and between the same parties are brought in the courts of different Member States, any court other than the court first seised shall of its own motion stay its proceedings until such time as the jurisdiction of the court first seised is established.
Če pred sodišči različnih držav članic tečejo postopki z istim zahtevkom med istima strankama, vsa sodišča razen tistega, ki je prvo začelo postopek, po uradni dolžnosti prekinejo postopke, vse dokler se ne ugotovi pristojnost sodišča, ki je prvo začelo postopek.
Where the jurisdiction of the court first seised is established, any court other than the court first seised shall decline jurisdiction in favour of that court.
Ko se ugotovi pristojnost sodišča, ki je prvo začelo postopek, se vsa sodišča razen tistega, ki je prvo začelo postopek, izrečejo za nepristojna v korist tega sodišča.
Related actions
Sorodne pravde
Where related actions are pending in the courts of different Member States, any court other than the court first seised may stay its proceedings.
Če tečejo sorodne pravde pred sodišči različnih držav članic, lahko vsa sodišča, razen tistega, ki je prvo začelo postopek, prekinejo postopek.
Where these actions are pending at first instance, any court other than the court first seised may also, on the application of one of the parties, decline jurisdiction if the court first seised has jurisdiction over the actions in question and its law permits the consolidation thereof.
Če tečejo te pravde na prvi stopnji, se lahko vsa sodišča, razen tistega, ki je prvo začelo postopek, na zahtevo ene od strank izrečejo za nepristojna, če je sodišče, ki je prvo začelo postopek, pristojno za odločanje v zadevnih postopkih in če zakon dovoljuje združitev pravd.
For the purposes of this Article, actions are deemed to be related where they are so closely connected that it is expedient to hear and determine them together to avoid the risk of irreconcilable judgments resulting from separate proceedings.
Za namene tega člena se šteje, da so pravde sorodne, če so tako tesno povezane med seboj, da se zdita njihova skupna obravnava in odločanje o njih smiselni, da bi se s tem izognili nevarnosti nezdružljivih sodnih odločb, ki bi izhajale iz ločenih postopkov.
Provisional, including protective, measures
Začasni ukrepi in ukrepi zavarovanja
Application may be made to the courts of a Member State for such provisional, including protective, measures as may be available under the law of that State, even if, under this Regulation, the courts of another Member State have jurisdiction as to the substance of the matter.
Pri sodiščih države članice se lahko vloži zahteva za začasne ukrepe ali ukrepe zavarovanja, ki jih predvideva pravo te države članice, tudi v primeru, ko so po tej uredbi za odločanje o glavni stvari pristojna sodišča druge države članice.
Determination of the applicable law
Določitev prava, ki se uporablja
The law applicable to maintenance obligations shall be determined in accordance with the Hague Protocol of 23 November 2007 on the law applicable to maintenance obligations (hereinafter referred to as the 2007 Hague Protocol) in the Member States bound by that instrument.
Pravo, ki se uporablja za preživninske obveznosti, se določi v skladu s Haaškim protokolom z dne 23. novembra 2007 o pravu, ki se uporablja za preživninske obveznosti (v nadaljnjem besedilu: „Haaški protokol iz leta 2007“) v državah članicah, ki jih ta instrument zavezuje.
RECOGNITION, ENFORCEABILITY AND ENFORCEMENT OF DECISIONS
PRIZNAVANJE, IZVRŠLJIVOST IN IZVRŠEVANJE SODNIH ODLOČB
Scope of application of this Chapter
Področje uporabe tega poglavja
This Chapter shall govern the recognition, enforceability and enforcement of decisions falling within the scope of this Regulation.
To poglavje ureja priznavanje, izvršljivost in izvrševanje vseh sodnih odločb, ki spadajo v področje uporabe te uredbe.
Section 1 shall apply to decisions given in a Member State bound by the 2007 Hague Protocol.
Oddelek 1 se uporablja za sodne odločbe, izdane v državi članici, ki jo zavezuje Haaški protokol iz leta 2007.
Section 2 shall apply to decisions given in a Member State not bound by the 2007 Hague Protocol.
Oddelek 2 se uporablja za sodne odločbe, izdane v državi članici, ki je Haaški protokol iz leta 2007 ne zavezuje.
Section 3 shall apply to all decisions.
Oddelek 3 se uporablja za vse sodne odločbe.
Decisions given in a Member State bound by the 2007 Hague Protocol
Sodne odločbe, izdane v državi članici, ki jo zavezuje Haaški protokol iz leta 2007
Abolition of exequatur
Odprava exequatur
A decision given in a Member State bound by the 2007 Hague Protocol shall be recognised in another Member State without any special procedure being required and without any possibility of opposing its recognition.
Sodna odločba, izdana v državi članici, ki jo zavezuje Haaški protokol iz leta 2007, se prizna tudi v drugi državi članici, ne da bi bilo treba začeti poseben postopek in brez možnosti ugovora njenemu priznanju.
A decision given in a Member State bound by the 2007 Hague Protocol which is enforceable in that State shall be enforceable in another Member State without the need for a declaration of enforceability.
Sodna odločba, izdana v državi članici, ki jo zavezuje Haaški protokol iz leta 2007, in izvršljiva v tej državi, je izvršljiva tudi v drugi državi članici, ne da bi jo bilo treba razglasiti za izvršljivo.
Protective measures
Ukrepi zavarovanja
An enforceable decision shall carry with it by operation of law the power to proceed to any protective measures which exist under the law of the Member State of enforcement.
Izvršljiva sodna odločba po samem zakonu vključuje pooblastilo za ukrepe zavarovanja, ki obstajajo po zakonodaji države članice izvršitve.
Right to apply for a review
Pravica do zahteve za ponovno preučitev
A defendant who did not enter an appearance in the Member State of origin shall have the right to apply for a review of the decision before the competent court of that Member State where:
Tožena stranka, ki se ne spusti v postopek v državi članici izvora, ima pravico, da zahteva ponovno preučitev sodne odločbe na pristojnem sodišču te države članice, če:
he was not served with the document instituting the proceedings or an equivalent document in sufficient time and in such a way as to enable him to arrange for his defence; or
ji listina o začetku postopka ali enakovredna listina ni bila vročena pravočasno in na način, ki bi ji omogočil pripravo obrambe, ali
he was prevented from contesting the maintenance claim by reason of force majeure or due to extraordinary circumstances without any fault on his part;
ni mogla ugovarjati preživninskemu zahtevku zaradi višje sile ali izrednih okoliščin, ki so nastopile brez njene krivde,
unless he failed to challenge the decision when it was possible for him to do so.
razen če ni začela postopka za izpodbijanje sodne odločbe, čeprav je to možnost imela.
The time limit for applying for a review shall run from the day the defendant was effectively acquainted with the contents of the decision and was able to react, at the latest from the date of the first enforcement measure having the effect of making his property non-disposable in whole or in part.
Rok za vložitev zahteve za ponovno preučitev začne teči od dneva, ko je bila tožena stranka dejansko seznanjena z vsebino sodne odločbe in je bila sposobna ukrepati, vendar najkasneje od dneva prvega izvršilnega ukrepa, zaradi katerega njeno premoženje v celoti ali delno postane nerazpoložljivo.
The defendant shall react promptly, in any event within 45 days.
Tožena stranka ukrepa nemudoma, v vsakem primeru pa v roku 45 dni.
No extension may be granted on account of distance.
Ta rok se ne sme podaljšati zaradi velike razdalje.
If the court rejects the application for a review referred to in paragraph 1 on the basis that none of the grounds for a review set out in that paragraph apply, the decision shall remain in force.
Če sodišče zavrne zahtevo za ponovno preučitev iz odstavka 1, ker za to ni podan noben od tam navedenih razlogov, ostane sodna odločba veljavna.
If the court decides that a review is justified for one of the reasons laid down in paragraph 1, the decision shall be null and void.
Če sodišče odloči, da je zahteva za ponovno preučitev utemeljena zaradi enega od razlogov iz odstavka 1, je sodna odločba nična in neveljavna.
However, the creditor shall not lose the benefits of the interruption of prescription or limitation periods, or the right to claim retroactive maintenance acquired in the initial proceedings.
Vendar upravičenec ne izgubi pravic, ki izhajajo iz prekinitve prekluzivnih ali zastaralnih rokov ali pravice, da za nazaj zahteva preživnino, pridobljeno v prejšnjnem postopku.
Documents for the purposes of enforcement
Listine za namene izvršitve
For the purposes of enforcement of a decision in another Member State, the claimant shall provide the competent enforcement authorities with:
Za namene izvršitve sodne odločbe v drugi državi članici vlagatelj predloži organom, pristojnim za izvršitev:
a copy of the decision which satisfies the conditions necessary to establish its authenticity;
izvod sodne odločbe, ki izpolnjuje pogoje, potrebne za ugotovitev njegove verodostojnosti;
the extract from the decision issued by the court of origin using the form set out in Annex I;
izvleček sodne odločbe, ki ga izda pristojni organ države članice izvora na obrazcu iz Priloge I;
where appropriate, a document showing the amount of any arrears and the date such amount was calculated;
po potrebi dokument o stanju zakasnelih plačil z navedbo datuma izračuna;
where necessary, a transliteration or a translation of the content of the form referred to in point (b) into the official language of the Member State of enforcement or, where there are several official languages in that Member State, into the official language or one of the official languages of court proceedings of the place where the application is made, in accordance with the law of that Member State, or into another language that the Member State concerned has indicated it can accept.
po potrebi transliteracija ali prevod vsebine obrazca iz točke (b) v uradni jezik države članice izvršitve ali, če v tej državi članici obstaja več uradnih jezikov, v uradni jezik ali enega od uradnih jezikov sodnega postopka v kraju, kjer se vloži zahtevek, v skladu s pravom te države članice, ali v drugi jezik, ki ga je država članica izvršitve označila za sprejemljivega.
Each Member State may indicate the official language or languages of the institutions of the European Union other than its own which it can accept for the completion of the form.
Vsaka država članica lahko navede uradni jezik ali uradne jezike institucij Evropske unije, drugačne od njenega lastnega, ki ga oziroma jih lahko sprejme za izpolnitev obrazca.
The competent authorities of the Member State of enforcement may not require the claimant to provide a translation of the decision.
Pristojni organi države članice izvršitve ne smejo zahtevati prevoda sodne odločbe od stranke, ki zahteva izvršitev.
However, a translation may be required if the enforcement of the decision is challenged.
Prevod pa se sme zahtevati, če se izpodbija izvršitev sodne odločbe.
Any translation under this Article must be done by a person qualified to do translations in one of the Member States.
Prevod iz naslova tega člena mora opraviti oseba, ki je v eni od držav članic pooblaščena za prevajanje.
Refusal or suspension of enforcement
Zavrnitev ali prekinitev izvršitve
The grounds of refusal or suspension of enforcement under the law of the Member State of enforcement shall apply in so far as they are not incompatible with the application of paragraphs 2 and 3.
Razlogi za zavrnitev ali prekinitev izvršitve v skladu s pravom države članice izvršitve se upoštevajo, če niso nezdružljivi z uporabo odstavkov 2 in 3.
The competent authority in the Member State of enforcement shall, on application by the debtor, refuse, either wholly or in part, the enforcement of the decision of the court of origin if the right to enforce the decision of the court of origin is extinguished by the effect of prescription or the limitation of action, either under the law of the Member State of origin or under the law of the Member State of enforcement, whichever provides for the longer limitation period.
Na zahtevo zavezanca pristojni organ v državi članici izvršitve zavrne – v celoti ali delno – izvršitev odločbe sodišča izvora, če je pravica izvršitve odločbe sodišča izvora zastarala, bodisi po pravu države članice izvora ali po pravu države članice izvršitve, glede na to, katero od njiju določa daljši rok za zastaranje.
Furthermore, the competent authority in the Member State of enforcement may, on application by the debtor, refuse, either wholly or in part, the enforcement of the decision of the court of origin if it is irreconcilable with a decision given in the Member State of enforcement or with a decision given in another Member State or in a third State which fulfils the conditions necessary for its recognition in the Member State of enforcement.
Nadalje lahko pristojni organ v državi članici izvršitve na zahtevo zavezanca v celoti ali delno zavrne izvršitev odločbe sodišča izvora, če je ta nezdružljiva z odločbo, izdano v državi članici izvršitve, ali z odločbo, izdano v drugi državi članici ali tretji državi, ki izpolnjuje pogoje, potrebne za priznanje v državi članici izvršitve.
A decision which has the effect of modifying an earlier decision on maintenance on the basis of changed circumstances shall not be considered an irreconcilable decision within the meaning of the second subparagraph.
Odločba, ki spreminja predhodno preživninsko odločbo na podlagi spremenjenih okoliščin, ne velja za nezdružljivo odločbo v smislu drugega pododstavka.
The competent authority in the Member State of enforcement may, on application by the debtor, suspend, either wholly or in part, the enforcement of the decision of the court of origin if the competent court of the Member State of origin has been seised of an application for a review of the decision of the court of origin pursuant to Article 19.
Pristojni organ v državi članici izvršitve lahko na zahtevo zavezanca v celoti ali delno prekine izvršitev odločbe sodišča izvora, če je pristojno sodišče države članice izvora začelo postopek na podlagi zahteve za ponovno preučitev odločbe sodišča izvora v skladu s členom 19.
Furthermore, the competent authority of the Member State of enforcement shall, on application by the debtor, suspend the enforcement of the decision of the court of origin where the enforceability of that decision is suspended in the Member State of origin.
Poleg tega pristojni organ države članice izvršitve na zahtevo zavezanca prekine izvršitev odločbe sodišča izvora, če se izvršljivost te odločbe začasno razveljavi v državi članici izvora.
No effect on the existence of family relationships
Neučinkovanje na obstoj družinskih razmerij
The recognition and enforcement of a decision on maintenance under this Regulation shall not in any way imply the recognition of the family relationship, parentage, marriage or affinity underlying the maintenance obligation which gave rise to the decision.
Priznanje in izvršitev sodne odločbe v preživninskih zadevah po tej uredbi nikakor ne pomeni priznanja družinskega razmerja, starševstva, zakonske zveze ali svaštva, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta sodna odločba o preživninski obveznosti.
Decisions given in a Member State not bound by the 2007 Hague Protocol
Sodne odločbe, izdane v državi članici, ki je Haaški protokol iz leta 2007 ne zavezuje
A decision given in a Member State not bound by the 2007 Hague Protocol shall be recognised in the other Member States without any special procedure being required.
Sodna odločba, izdana v državi članici, ki je Haaški protokol iz leta 2007 ne zavezuje, se v drugih državah članicah prizna, ne da bi bilo potrebno za priznanje začeti kakršen koli poseben postopek.
Any interested party who raises the recognition of a decision as the principal issue in a dispute may, in accordance with the procedures provided for in this Section, apply for a decision that the decision be recognised.
Vsaka zainteresirana stranka, ki kot glavni predmet spora uveljavlja priznanje sodne odločbe, lahko v skladu s postopki iz tega oddelka zahteva, da se sodna odločba prizna.
If the outcome of proceedings in a court of a Member State depends on the determination of an incidental question of recognition, that court shall have jurisdiction over that question.
Če je izid postopka pred sodiščem države članice odvisen od odločitve o priznanju kot o predhodnem vprašanju, lahko o priznanju odloča to sodišče.
Grounds of refusal of recognition
Razlogi za zavrnitev priznanja
A decision shall not be recognised:
Sodna odločba se ne prizna:
if such recognition is manifestly contrary to public policy in the Member State in which recognition is sought.
če bi bilo njeno priznanje v očitnem nasprotju z javnim redom v državi članici, v kateri se zahteva priznanje.
The test of public policy may not be applied to the rules relating to jurisdiction;
Preizkus javnega reda se ne sme uporabiti glede pravil o pristojnosti;
where it was given in default of appearance, if the defendant was not served with the document which instituted the proceedings or with an equivalent document in sufficient time and in such a way as to enable him to arrange for his defence, unless the defendant failed to commence proceedings to challenge the decision when it was possible for him to do so;
če toženi stranki, ki se ni spustila v postopek, ni bilo vročeno pisanje o začetku postopka ali enakovredno pisanje pravočasno in na tak način, da bi lahko pripravila obrambo, razen če tožena stranka ni začela postopka za izpodbijanje sodne odločbe, čeprav je imela to možnost;
if it is irreconcilable with a decision given in a dispute between the same parties in the Member State in which recognition is sought;
če je nezdružljiva s sodno odločbo, izdano v sporu med istima strankama v državi članici, v kateri se zahteva priznanje;
if it is irreconcilable with an earlier decision given in another Member State or in a third State in a dispute involving the same cause of action and between the same parties, provided that the earlier decision fulfils the conditions necessary for its recognition in the Member State in which recognition is sought.
če je nezdružljiva s predhodno sodno odločbo, izdano v drugi državi članici ali v tretji državi glede istega zahtevka med istima strankama, pod pogojem, da predhodna sodna odločba izpolnjuje pogoje za priznanje v državi članici, v kateri se zahteva priznanje.
A decision which has the effect of modifying an earlier decision on maintenance on the basis of changed circumstances shall not be considered an irreconcilable decision within the meaning of points (c) or (d).
Odločba, ki na podlagi spremenjenih okoliščin spreminja predhodno preživninsko odločbo, ne velja za nezdružljivo odločbo v smislu točk (c) in (d).
Staying of recognition proceedings
Prekinitev postopka
A court of a Member State in which recognition is sought of a decision given in a Member State not bound by the 2007 Hague Protocol shall stay the proceedings if the enforceability of the decision is suspended in the Member State of origin by reason of an appeal.
Sodišče države članice, v kateri se zahteva priznanje odločbe, ki jo izda sodišče države članice, ki je Haaški protokol iz leta 2007 ne zavezuje, prekine postopek, če je izvršljivost odločbe v državi članici izvora začasno razveljavljena zaradi odločanja o pravnem sredstvu.