natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The excessive deficit procedure (EDP) under Article 126 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, as clarified by Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 of 7 July 1997 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure [1] (which is part of the Stability and Growth Pact), provides for a decision on the existence of an excessive deficit.
Po postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem iz člena 126 PDEU, kot je pojasnjen v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1467/97 z dne 7. julija 1997 o pospešitvi in razjasnitvi izvajanja postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem [1] (ki je del Pakta za stabilnost in rast), je predvidena odločitev o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja.
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 also establishes provisions for the implementation of Article 104 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, which has become Article 126 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
V Uredbi (ES) št. 1467/97 so prav tako določbe o izvajanju člena 104 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti (PES), ki je postal člen 126 PDEU.
The Protocol on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union sets out further provisions relating to the implementation of the EDP.
Protokol o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, ki je priloga k PDEU, vsebuje dodatne določbe glede izvajanja postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem.
Article 104(5) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, which has become Article 126(5) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, required the Commission to address an opinion to the Council if the Commission considered that an excessive deficit in a Member State existed or might occur.
V skladu s členom 104(5) PES, ki je postal člen 126(5) PDEU mora Komisija Svetu predložiti mnenje, če meni, da v državi članici obstaja čezmerni primanjkljaj ali tveganje zanj.
Having taken into account its report in accordance with Article 104(3) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, which has become Article 126(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Financial Committee in accordance with Article 104(4) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, which has become Article 126(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Commission concluded that an excessive deficit existed in Slovenia.
Komisija je na podlagi svojega poročila po členu 104(3) PES, ki je postal 126(3) PDEU, in mnenja Ekonomsko-finančnega odbora po členu 104(4) PES, ki je postal 126(4) PDEU, ugotovila, da v Sloveniji obstaja čezmerni primanjkljaj.
The Commission therefore addressed such an opinion to the Council in respect of Slovenia on 11 November 2009 [3].
Komisija je zato 11. novembra 2009 Svetu predložila zadevno mnenje v zvezi s Slovenijo [3].
Article 126(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union states that the Council should consider any observations which the Member State concerned may wish to make before deciding, after an overall assessment, whether an excessive deficit exists.
V skladu s členom 126(6) PDEU Svet upošteva morebitne pripombe, ki jih želi predložiti zadevna država članica, preden po opravljeni celoviti oceni odloči, ali čezmerni primanjkljaj obstaja.
In the case of Slovenia, this overall assessment leads to the conclusions set out in this Decision.
V primeru Slovenije je Svet na podlagi te celovite ocene podal ugotovitve, kakor izhaja iz tega sklepa.
According to data notified by the Slovenian authorities in October 2009, the general government deficit in Slovenia is planned to reach 5,9 % of GDP in 2009, thus exceeding and not close to the 3 % of GDP reference value.
Po podatkih, ki so jih slovenski organi sporočili oktobra 2009, bo javnofinančni primanjkljaj Slovenije v letu 2009 predvidoma dosegel 5,9 % BDP in tako znatno presegel referenčno vrednost, ki znaša 3 % BDP.
The planned excess over the reference value can be qualified as exceptional within the meaning of the Treaty and the Stability and Growth Pact.
Predvideno preseganje referenčne vrednosti velja za izjemno v smislu Pogodbe ter Pakta za stabilnost in rast.
Real GDP growth, which halved between 2007 and 2008, is projected to be sharply negative in 2009 (– 7,4 %) according to the Commission services’ autumn 2009 forecast.
Realna rast BDP, ki se je v letih 2007 in 2008 prepolovila, bo po napovedi služb Komisije iz jeseni 2009 letos močno negativna, saj bo znašala – 7,4 %.
Although Slovenia’s budgetary outcomes have been good in the recent past when economic conditions were still favourable, thanks to higher-than-budgeted revenue growth, budgetary execution was marked by expenditure overruns.
Čeprav so bili proračunski rezultati Slovenije v prejšnjih letih dobri, saj so bili gospodarski pogoji še vedno ugodni, zlasti zaradi rasti prihodkov, ki je bila višja od načrtovane, so izvrševanje proračuna zaznamovale prekoračitve pri odhodkih.
Furthermore, the planned excess over the reference value cannot be considered temporary since, according to the Commission services’ autumn 2009 forecast, the deficit would widen from 6,3 % of GDP in 2009 to around 7 % of GDP in 2011 on a no-policy change assumption, while real GDP is forecast to recover to moderate positive growth.
Poleg tega predvidene prekoračitve referenčne vrednosti ni mogoče obravnavati kot začasne, saj se bo, ob predpostavki, da se politika ne bo spremenila, na podlagi napovedi služb Komisije iz jeseni 2009 primanjkljaj povečal s 6,3 % BDP leta 2009 na okoli 7 % BDP leta 2011, medtem ko bo realni BDP predvidoma spet začel počasi rasti.
According to data notified by the Slovenian authorities in October 2009, the general government gross debt remains well below the 60 % of GDP reference value and is planned to stand at 34,2 % of GDP in 2009.
Po podatkih, ki so jih slovenski organi sporočili oktobra 2009, bruto javni dolg ostaja precej pod referenčno vrednostjo, ki znaša 60 % BDP, in pričakuje se, da bo leta 2009 dosegel vrednost 34,2 % BDP.
According to the Commission services’ autumn 2009 forecast, the debt ratio would, on a no-policy change basis, rise further, to some 48 % of GDP by 2011.
Glede na napoved služb Komisije iz jeseni 2009 naj bi se delež dolga ob nespremenjeni politiki povečal na 48 % BDP do leta 2011.
According to Article 2(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97, ‘relevant factors’ can only be taken into account in the steps leading to the Council decision on the existence of an excessive deficit in accordance with Article 126(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union if the double condition — that the deficit remains close to the reference value and that its excess over the reference value is temporary — is fully met.
V skladu s členom 2(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1467/97 se „pomembni dejavniki“ v fazah, ki vodijo do odločitve Sveta o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja v skladu s členom 126(6) PDEU, lahko upoštevajo le, če je v celoti izpolnjen dvojni pogoj – da primanjkljaj ostaja blizu referenčne vrednosti in da je referenčna vrednost presežena začasno.
In the case of Slovenia, this double condition is not met.
V primeru Slovenije ta dvojni pogoj ni izpolnjen.
Therefore, relevant factors are not taken into account in the steps leading to this Decision,
Zato v fazah, ki vodijo do te odločitve, pomembni dejavniki niso upoštevani –
From an overall assessment it follows that an excessive deficit exists in Slovenia.
Iz celovite ocene sledi, da v Sloveniji obstaja čezmerni primanjkljaj.
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Slovenia.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Republiko Slovenijo.
All EDP-related documents for Slovenia can be found at the following website: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/netstartsearch/pdfsearch/pdf.cfm?mode = _m2
Vsi dokumenti za Slovenijo, povezani s postopkom v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, so na voljo na spletni strani: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/netstartsearch/pdfsearch/pdf.cfm?mode = _m2
This assumption takes into account that, according to government plans, most measures of extraordinary nature linked to the crisis in line with the European Economic Recovery Plan, amounting to almost 1,25 % of GDP in 2009, will be gradually rolled back in 2010 and 2011.
Ta predpostavka upošteva, da bo v skladu z državnimi načrti večina izjemnih ukrepov za odpravo krize v skladu z evropskim načrtom za oživitev gospodarstva, ki leta 2009 znašajo skoraj 1,25 % BDP, leta 2010 in 2011 postopno zmanjšana.
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/289/EU of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Slovenia
Popravek Sklepa Sveta 2010/289/EU z dne 19. januarja 2010 o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja v Sloveniji
In the contents and on page 46, in the title:
Vsebina in stran 46, naslov:
‘Council Decision of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Slovenia (2010/289/EU)’,
„Sklep Sveta z dne 19. januarja 2010 o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja v Sloveniji (2010/289/EU)“
‘Council Decision of 2 December 2009 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Slovenia (2010/289/EU)’;
„Sklep Sveta z dne 2. decembra 2009 o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja v Sloveniji (2010/289/EU)“.
on page 47, concluding formula:
Stran 47, zaključno besedilo:
Having regard to the observations made by Slovakia,
ob upoštevanju pripomb, ki jih je predložila Slovaška,
Having taken into account its report in accordance with Article 104(3) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, which has become Article 126(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Financial Committee in accordance with Article 104(4) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, which has become Article 126(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Commission concluded that an excessive deficit existed in Slovakia.
Komisija je na podlagi svojega poročila v skladu s členom 104(3) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, ki je postal člen 126(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ter ob upoštevanju mnenja Ekonomsko-finančnega odbora po členu 104(4) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, ki je postal člen 126(4) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ugotovila, da na Slovaškem obstaja čezmerni primanjkljaj.
The Commission therefore addressed such an opinion to the Council in respect of Slovakia on 11 November 2009 [3].
Komisija je zato 11. novembra 2009 Svetu predložila zadevno mnenje v zvezi s Slovaško [3].
In the case of Slovakia, this overall assessment leads to the conclusions set out in this Decision.
V primeru Slovaške ta celovita ocena vodi do zaključkov, ki so izpostavljeni v tem sklepu.
According to data notified by the Slovak authorities in October 2009, the general government deficit in Slovakia is planned to reach 6,3 % of GDP in 2009, thus exceeding and not close to the 3 % of GDP reference value.
Po podatkih, ki so jih slovaški organi sporočili oktobra 2009, bo javnofinančni primanjkljaj Slovaške v letu 2009 predvidoma dosegel 6,3 % BDP in tako znatno presegel referenčno vrednost, ki znaša 3 % BDP.
Furthermore, the planned excess over the reference value cannot be considered temporary, since the Commission services’ 2009 forecast projects the general government deficit to reach 6 % of GDP in 2010 based on the no-policy change assumption.
Poleg tega ni mogoče reči, da je načrtovano preseganje referenčne vrednosti začasno, saj napoved služb Komisije iz leta 2009 predvideva, da bo javnofinančni primanjkljaj dosegel 6 % BDP v letu 2010 ob predpostavki nespremenjene politike.
In line with the provisions in the Stability and Growth Pact, the Commission in its report gave due consideration to systemic pension reforms introducing a multi-pillar system that includes a mandatory, fully-funded pillar.
Komisija je v skladu z določbami iz Pakta za stabilnost in rast v svojem poročilu ustrezno upoštevala reforme pokojninskega sistema, ki uvajajo večstebrni sistem. Ta vključuje obvezen, v celoti naložbeni pokojninski steber.
Since the deficit does not remain close to the reference value in 2009-2011, the cost of the pension reform cannot be taken into account.
Ker primanjkljaj ne ostaja blizu referenčne vrednosti v obdobju 2009–2011, stroškov pokojninske reforme ni mogoče upoštevati.
In the case of Slovakia, this double condition is not met.
V primeru Slovaške dvojni pogoj ni izpolnjen.
From an overall assessment it follows that an excessive deficit exists in Slovakia.
Iz celovite ocene sledi, da na Slovaškem obstaja čezmerni primanjkljaj.
This Decision is addressed to the Slovak Republic.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Slovaško republiko.
All EDP-related documents for Slovakia can be found at the following website: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/netstartsearch/pdfsearch/pdf.cfm?mode = _m2
Vsi dokumenti za Slovaško, povezani s postopkom v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, so na voljo na spletni strani: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/netstartsearch/pdfsearch/pdf.cfm?mode = _m2
The Commission services’ 2009 autumn forecast projects real GDP to contract by 5,8 % in 2009.
Po napovedi služb Komisije iz jeseni 2009 naj bi se realni BDP leta 2009 zmanjšal za 5,8 %.
While the excess over the 3 % reference value mainly reflects the severity of the economic downturn, it also results from the significant deterioration of the structural balance since 2005.
Preseganje referenčne vrednosti 3 % je sicer predvsem posledica močnega upada gospodarske rasti, vendar je nanj vplivalo tudi precejšnje poslabšanje strukturnega salda od leta 2005.
According to data notified by the Slovak authorities in October 2009, the general government gross debt remains well below the 60 % of GDP reference value and is planned to stand at around 30 % of GDP in 2009.
Po podatkih, ki so jih slovaški organi sporočili oktobra 2009, ostaja bruto javni dolg precej pod referenčno vrednostjo 60 % BDP in naj bi v letu 2009 znašal približno 30 % BDP.
According to the Commission services’ autumn forecast, the debt ratio is set to increase rapidly, reaching 42,7 % of GDP in 2011 under the no policy change assumption.
V skladu z jesensko napovedjo služb Komisije naj bi delež dolga hitro naraščal in v letu 2011 dosegel 42,7 % BDP, ob predpostavki nespremenjene politike.
Based on the estimates of the Slovak authorities, the net costs of this reform amount to 1,1 % of GDP in 2009-2011, rising to 1,2 % in 2012.
Na podlagi ocen slovaških organov bodo neto stroški te reforme v obdobju 2009–2011 znašali 1,1 % BDP, leta 2012 pa se bodo zvišali na 1,2 % BDP.
According to the Stability and Growth Pact, these can be taken into account on a linear degressive basis for a transitory period and only in case the deficit remains close to the reference value.
V skladu s Paktom za stabilnost in rast se stroški lahko upoštevajo na linearno degresivni osnovi za prehodno obdobje in le, če primanjkljaj ostaja blizu referenčne vrednosti.
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/290/EU of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Slovakia
Popravek Sklepa Sveta 2010/290/EU z dne 19. januarja 2010 o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja na Slovaškem
In the contents and on page 48, in the title:
Vsebina in stran 48, naslov:
‘Council Decision of 19 January 2010 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Slovakia (2010/290/EU)’,
„Sklep Sveta z dne 19. januarja 2010 o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja na Slovaškem (2010/290/EU)“
‘Council Decision of 2 December 2009 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Slovakia (2010/290/EU)’;
„Sklep Sveta z dne 2. decembra 2009 o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja na Slovaškem (2010/289/EU)“.
on page 49, concluding formula:
Stran 49, zaključno besedilo:
establishing whether effective action has been taken by Greece in response to the Council Recommendation of 27 April 2009
o ugotovitvi, ali je Grčija sprejela učinkovite ukrepe na podlagi Priporočila Sveta z dne 27. aprila 2009
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 126(8) in conjunction with Article 126(13) and Article 136 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 126(8) v povezavi s členom 126(13) in členom 136 Pogodbe,
According to Article 126(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Member States are to avoid excessive government deficits.
V skladu s členom 126(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije se morajo države članice izogibati čezmernemu javnofinančnemu primanjkljaju.
It aimed at ensuring that, in particular, the economic and budgetary background was taken into account fully in all steps in the excessive deficit procedure.
Cilj prenove Pakta je bil zagotoviti, da se v vseh fazah postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem v celoti upošteva predvsem gospodarsko in proračunsko ozadje.
In this way, the Stability and Growth Pact provides the framework supporting government policies for a prompt return to sound budgetary positions taking account of the economic situation.
Tako Pakt za stabilnost in rast zagotavlja okvir, ki podpira politike vlad za hitro ponovno vzpostavitev trdnega proračunskega stanja, pri tem pa upošteva gospodarske razmere.
The Council, acting upon a recommendation by the Commission, decided on 27 April 2009, in accordance with Article 104(6) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, that an excessive deficit existed in Greece [2].
V skladu s členom 104(6) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti je Svet 27. aprila 2009 na podlagi priporočila Komisije sklenil, da je v Grčiji obstajal čezmerni primanjkljaj [2].
On 27 April 2009, the Council, also on the basis of a Commission recommendation, adopted a recommendation [3] in accordance with Article 104(7) of the Treaty establishing the European Community to the Greek authorities calling on them to put an end to the excessive deficit situation by 2010 at the latest, by bringing the general government deficit below 3 % of GDP in a credible and sustainable manner.
V skladu s členom 104(7) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti je Svet 27. aprila 2009, prav tako na podlagi priporočila Komisije, sprejel priporočilo [3], v katerem je grške organe pozval, naj najpozneje do leta 2010 odpravijo sedanje stanje čezmernega primanjkljaja, tako da se javnofinančni primanjkljaj verodostojno in trajnostno zniža pod 3 % BDP.
To that end, the Council established the deadline of 27 October 2009 for the Greek government to take effective action.
V ta namen je Svet določil rok, do katerega morajo grški organi sprejeti učinkovite ukrepe, in sicer 27. oktober 2009.
The progress with improving the collection and processing of statistical data and their reporting, in particular general government data, as requested by the Council, has been deficient.
Napredek pri izboljševanju zbiranja in obdelave statističnih podatkov, zlasti javnofinančnih, kot je zahteval Svet, ni zadovoljiv.
The latest revision of the October 2009 notification has not been validated by Eurostat due to the significant uncertainties over the figures notified by the Greek authorities.
Eurostat zaradi precejšnjih negotovosti glede številk, ki so jih priglasili grški organi, ni potrdil zadnjega popravka obvestila iz oktobra 2009.
The procedures in place to ensure a prompt and correct supply of general government data required by the existing legal framework are manifestly inadequate.
Vzpostavljeni postopki za zagotavljanje hitrih in točnih javnofinančnih podatkov, zahtevanih z veljavnim pravnim okvirom, so očitno neustrezni.
The assessment of the action taken by Greece to correct the excessive deficit by 2010 in response to the Council Recommendation under Article 104(7) of the Treaty establishing the European Community leads to the following conclusions:
Na podlagi ocene ukrepov, ki jih je sprejela Grčija za zmanjšanje čezmernega primanjkljaja do leta 2010 na podlagi priporočila Sveta v skladu s členom 104(7) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, se sklene naslednje:
subsequent to the Council Recommendation under Article 104(7) in April 2009, the Greek authorities implemented the deficit-reducing measures included in the 2009 budget law, the January 2009 update of the stability programme and the March 2009 additional package of fiscal measures.
po priporočilu Sveta v skladu s členom 104(7) PES iz aprila 2009 so grški organi izvedli ukrepe za zmanjšanje primanjkljaja, ki so bili vključeni v zakon o proračunu za leto 2009, dopolnitev programa stabilnosti iz januarja 2009 in dodatni paket fiskalnih ukrepov iz marca 2009.
However, although the deterioration in macroeconomic conditions has been more pronounced than anticipated by the authorities, public finances have worsened much beyond what could have been expected as a result of the stronger-than-projected downturn and to a large extent as a result of budgetary policies implemented by the Greek government.
Čeprav je bilo poslabšanje makroekonomskih pogojev izrazitejše od pričakovanj organov, pa so bile javne finance precej bolj oslabljene, kot bi bilo mogoče pričakovati zaradi upada, ki je bil večji od napovedanega, in v precejšnji meri zaradi proračunskih politik, ki jih je izvedla grška vlada.
Notably, on the expenditure side, the 2009 budget execution points to sizeable expenditure overruns in 2009 of which more than half is attributed to higher-than-budgeted outlays for compensation of employees and increased capital spending.
Izvajanje proračuna za leto 2009 zlasti na strani odhodkov kaže na precejšnje prekoračitve v letu 2009, katerih več kot polovica se pripisuje izdatkom za nadomestila za zaposlene, ki so višji od predvidenih v proračunu, in povečani kapitalski porabi.
On the revenue side, the 2009 budget execution points to important shortcomings in the tax collection system, including tax compliance,
Na strani prihodkov kaže izvajanje proračuna za leto 2009 bistvene primanjkljaje v sistemu pobiranja davkov, vključno z izpolnjevanjem fiskalnih obveznosti,
on 25 June 2009, the Greek authorities announced additional deficit-reducing discretionary measures, with an estimated budgetary impact of some 1,25 % percentage points of GDP.
grški organi so 25. junija 2009 napovedali dodatne diskrecijske ukrepe za zmanjšanje primanjkljaja, katerih proračunski vpliv naj bi po ocenah znašal približno 1,25 odstotne točke BDP.
However, the majority of the measures have not been implemented by the Greek authorities so far and almost one percentage point of GDP was temporary in nature (one-offs), targeting additional revenue, hence not in line with the Council recommendations to strengthen fiscal adjustment in 2009 through permanent measures, mainly on the expenditure side,
Vendar grški organi do danes večine teh ukrepov niso izvedli, ukrepi za skoraj eno odstotno točko BDP pa so bili začasni (enkratni) in usmerjeni v dodatne prihodke ter torej v nasprotju s priporočili Sveta, naj se prilagoditev proračuna v letu 2009 okrepi s trajnimi ukrepi, zlasti na strani odhodkov,
the large projected increase in the debt-to-GDP ratio exceeds the impact of the deterioration in the general government’s net borrowing position, indicating insufficient efforts to control factors other than net borrowing, which contribute to the change in debt levels.
veliko zvišanje deleža dolga glede na BDP, ki je bilo napovedano, presega učinek poslabšanja stanja javnofinančnega neto zadolževanja, kar kaže na nezadostna prizadevanja za nadzor dejavnikov poleg neto zadolževanja, ki prispevajo k spremembi stopenj dolga.
This leads to the conclusion that significant revenue shortfalls and expenditure overruns have led to a strong deterioration in Greece’s budgetary position in 2009, which can only partly be attributed to the deterioration of the macroeconomic conditions and, hence, are mainly due to an insufficient response by the Greek authorities to the April 2009 Council Recommendation under Article 104(7) of the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Iz navedenega je mogoče sklepati, da so precejšnji primanjkljaji prihodkov in prekoračitve odhodkov privedli do velikega poslabšanja proračunskega stanja Grčije v letu 2009, ki ga je mogoče samo delno pripisati poslabšanju makroekonomskih pogojev, zato je vzrok zanj predvsem nezadosten odgovor grških organov na priporočilo Sveta aprila 2009 v skladu s členom 104(7) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti –