natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having regard to Common Position 2006/276/CFSP of 10 April 2006 concerning restrictive measures against certain officials of Belarus and replacing Common Position 2004/661/CFSP [1],
ob upoštevanju Skupnega stališča Sveta 2006/276/SZVP z dne 10. aprila 2006 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti nekaterim uradnikom Belorusije in razveljavitvi Skupnega stališča 2004/661/SZVP [1],
Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 of 18 May 2006 concerning restrictive measures against President Lukashenko and certain officials of Belarus [2] imposed restrictive measures in accordance with Common Position 2006/276/CFSP.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 765/2006 z dne 18. maja 2006 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti predsedniku Lukašenku in nekaterim uradnikom Belorusije [2] je uvedla omejevalne ukrepe v skladu s Skupnim Stališčem 2006/276/SZVP.
It is appropriate to align Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 with recent developments in sanctions practice regarding the identification of competent authorities, liability for certain infringements and public notice regarding procedures for maintenance of certain lists.
Primerno je, da se Uredbo (ES) št. 765/2006 uskladi z nedavnim razvojem praks na področju sankcij v zvezi z določitvijo pristojnih organov, odgovornostjo za nekatere kršitve in javno objavo glede načinov vodenja nekaterih seznamov.
For the sake of clarity, those Articles to which amendments need to be made should be republished in full,
Zaradi jasnosti bi bilo treba tiste člene, ki jih je treba spremeniti, ponovno objaviti v celoti –
Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 is amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 765/2006 se spremeni:
the following Article is inserted:
vstavi se naslednji člen:
The prohibition set out in Article 2(2) shall not give rise to liability of any kind on the part of the natural or legal persons, entities or bodies concerned, if they did not know, and had no reasonable cause to suspect, that their actions would infringe this prohibition.’;
Prepoved iz člena 2(2) ne povzroči nikakršne odgovornosti fizične ali pravne osebe ali zadevnih subjektov ali organov, če niso vedeli ali niso imeli utemeljenega razloga za domnevo, da bi njihovi ukrepi lahko kršili to prepoved.“;
The competent authorities in the Member States, as indicated in the websites listed in Annex II, may authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources or the making available of certain funds or economic resources, under such conditions as they deem appropriate, after having determined that the funds or economic resources concerned are:
Pristojni organi držav članic, kot so navedeni na spletnih straneh iz Priloge II, lahko pod pogoji, ki se jim zdijo ustrezni, dovolijo sprostitev določenih zamrznjenih sredstev ali gospodarskih virov ali dajanje na razpolago določenih sredstev ali gospodarskih virov, potem ko se ugotovi, da so ta sredstva ali gospodarski viri:
necessary to satisfy the basic needs of persons listed in Annex I and their dependent family members, including payments for foodstuffs, rent or mortgage, medicines and medical treatment, taxes, insurance premiums and public utility charges;
nujni za zadovoljevanje osnovnih potreb oseb, navedenih v Prilogi I, in njihovih nepreskrbljenih družinskih članov, vključno s plačili za živila, najemninami ali hipotekami, zdravili in zdravstveno oskrbo, davki, zavarovalnimi premijami in pristojbinami za javne storitve;
intended exclusively for payment of reasonable professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses associated with the provision of legal services;
namenjeni izključno za plačilo razumnih honorarjev in nadomestil za stroške, povezane z zagotavljanjem pravnih storitev;
intended exclusively for payment of fees or service charges for routine holding or maintenance of frozen funds or economic resources; or
namenjeni izključno za plačilo pristojbin ali stroškov za rutinsko hrambo ali upravljanje zamrznjenih sredstev ali gospodarskih virov ali
necessary for extraordinary expenses, provided that the Member State concerned has notified the other Member States and the Commission of the grounds on which it considers that a specific authorisation should be granted, at least two weeks before the authorisation.
nujni za kritje izrednih stroškov, pod pogojem, da zadevna država članica o razlogih, na podlagi katerih meni, da bi bilo treba odobriti posebno dovoljenje, obvesti vse ostale države članice in Komisijo najmanj dva tedna pred odobritvijo.
Member States shall inform the other Member States and the Commission of any authorisation granted under paragraph 1.’;
Države članice obvestijo druge države članice in Komisijo o vseh dovoljenjih, izdanih v skladu z odstavkom 1.“;
immediately supply the competent authorities indicated in the websites listed in Annex II, in the country where they are resident or located, with any information which would facilitate compliance with this Regulation, such as accounts and amounts frozen in accordance with Article 2, and directly or indirectly supply such information to the Commission; and
pristojnim organom, ki so navedeni na spletnih straneh iz Priloge II, v državi, v katerih prebivajo ali se nahajajo, nemudoma predložijo vse informacije, ki bi olajšale izpolnjevanje te uredbe, kot so računi in zneski, zamrznjeni v skladu s členom 2, in neposredno ali posredno posredujejo te informacije Komisiji ter
cooperate with the competent authorities indicated in the websites listed in Annex II in any verification of this information.
sodelujejo s pristojnimi organi, ki so navedeni na spletnih straneh iz Priloge II, pri vsakem preverjanju teh informacij.
Any information provided or received in accordance with this Article shall be used only for the purposes for which it was provided or received.’;
Vse informacije, poslane ali prejete v skladu s tem členom, se uporabljajo samo za namene, za katere so bile poslane ali prejete.“;
Article 8 is replaced by the following:
člen 8 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
amend Annex I on the basis of decisions taken in respect of Annex IV to Common Position 2006/276/CFSP; and
spremembe Priloge I na podlagi odločitev, sprejetih v zvezi s Prilogo IV k Skupnemu stališču 2006/276/SZVP, ter
A notice shall be published regarding the procedures for submitting information in relation to Annex I.’;
O postopkih za predložitev informacij v zvezi s Prilogo I se objavi obvestilo.“;
Member States shall designate the competent authorities referred to in Articles 3, 4(2) and 5 and identify them in the websites listed in Annex II.
Države članice imenujejo pristojne organe iz členov 3, 4(2) in 5 ter jih navedejo na spletnih straneh iz Priloge II.
Member States shall notify the Commission of their competent authorities and the contact details thereof by 31 July 2008 and shall notify it of any subsequent amendment without delay.’;
Države članice do 31. julija 2008 uradno obvestijo Komisijo o svojih pristojnih organih, vključno s kontaktnimi podatki, in jo sproti obveščajo o vseh naknadnih spremembah.“;
Common Position as last amended by Common Position 2008/288/CFSP (OJ L 95, 8.4.2008, p. 66).
Skupno stališče, kakor je bilo nazadnje spremenjeno s Skupnim stališčem 2008/288/SZVP (UL L 95, 8.4.2008, str. 66).
Websites for information on the competent authorities referred to in Articles 3, 4(2) and 5, and address for notifications to the European Commission
Spletne strani za informacije o pristojnih organih iz členov 3, 4(2) in 5 ter naslov za uradno obveščanje Evropske komisije
Address for notifications to the European Commission:
Naslov za uradno obveščanje Evropske komisije:
Crisis Response and Peace Building
Odzivanje na krize in vzpostavljanje miru
B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel (Belgium)
B-1049 Bruselj (Belgija)
Tel. (32 2) 295 55 85
Telefon: (322) 295 55 85
Fax (32 2) 299 08 73’
Telefaks: (32 2) 299 08 73“
Directorate A. Crisis Platform and Policy Coordination in Common Foreign and Security Policy
Direktorat A. Krizna platforma in usklajevanje politike v okviru skupne zunanje in varnostne politike
Unit A2.
Enota A2.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 647/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 647/2008
This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 July 2008.
Ta uredba začne veljati 9. julija 2008.
to Commission Regulation of 8 July 2008 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 8. julija 2008 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 648/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 648/2008
establishing a prohibition of fishing for plaice in ICES zones of VIIh, VIIj and VIIk by vessels flying the flag of Belgium
o prepovedi ribolova na morsko ploščo v območjih ICES VIIh, VIIj in VIIk s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavo Belgije
OJ L 19, 23.1.2008, p. 1, Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 446/2008 (OJ L 134, 23.5.2008, p. 11).
UL L 19, 23.1.2008, str. 1. Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 446/2008 (UL L 134, 23.5.2008, str. 11).
ICES zones VIIh, VIIj and VIIk
Cone ICES VIIh, VIIj in VIIk
BEL
BELGIJA
Council Regulation (EC) No 649/2008
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 649/2008
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of powdered activated carbon originating in the People’s Republic of China
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz aktivnega oglja v prahu s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Articles 9 and 11(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti členov 9 in 11(2) Uredbe,
By Regulation (EC) No 1006/96 [2], following an anti-dumping investigation, the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of EUR 323 per tonne on imports on powdered activated carbon originating in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) (the original investigation).
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1006/96 [2] je Svet po protidampinški preiskavi uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev v višini 323 EUR na tono („prvotna preiskava“) za uvoz aktivnega oglja v prahu s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“).
By Regulation (EC) No 1011/2002 [3], following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Council renewed the imposition of the definitive anti-dumping duty on imports on powdered activated carbon originating in the PRC (the first expiry review investigation).
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1011/2002 [3] je Svet po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe obnovil dokončno protidampinško dajatev za uvoz aktivnega oglja v prahu s poreklom iz LRK („prva preiskava v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepov“).
Request for a review (Present investigation)
Zahtevek za pregled (sedanja preiskava)
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry [4], the Commission received a request on 12 March 2007 for an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Po objavi obvestila o bližajočem se izteku [4] je Komisija 12. marca 2007 prejela zahtevek za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged by the European Chemical Industry Council (CEFIC) (the applicant) on behalf of two producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50 %, of the total Community production of powdered activated carbon.
Zahtevek je vložil Svet evropske kemične industrije (CEFIC) („vložnik“) v imenu dveh proizvajalcev, ki predstavljata glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje aktivnega oglja v prahu v Skupnosti.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury to the Community industry.
Zahtevek je temeljil na izhodišču, da bi se zaradi izteka veljavnosti teh ukrepov damping in škoda za industrijo Skupnosti verjetno nadaljevala ali ponovila.
Having determined, after consulting the advisory committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of the expiry review, the Commission initiated this review on 13 June 2007, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union (the notice of initiation) [5].
Komisija je po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov, zato je 13. junija 2007 z objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije („obvestilo o začetku“) [5] začela s pregledom.
The Commission officially advised the exporters/producers, the representatives of the exporting country, importers, suppliers, producers, users in the Community and the applicant of the initiation of the expiry review.
Komisija je izvoznike/proizvajalce, predstavnike držav izvoznic, uvoznike, dobavitelje, proizvajalce, uporabnike v Skupnosti in vložnika uradno obvestila o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov.
All interested parties, who so requested and showed that there were particular reasons why they should be heard, were granted a hearing.
Vsem zainteresiranem strankam, ki so zahtevale zaslišanje ter dokazale, da zanj obstajajo posebni razlogi, je bilo to odobreno.
Sampling of exporters/producers in the PRC
Vzorčenje izvoznikov/proizvajalcev v LRK
In view of the apparent large number of exporters/producers in the PRC (132 listed in the review request), it was considered appropriate to examine whether sampling should be used in the expiry review in conformity with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi očitno velikega števila izvoznikov/proizvajalcev v LRK (132 navedenih v zahtevku za pregled) je bilo primerno, da se v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe prouči, ali je treba pri pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov uporabiti vzorčenje.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the exporters/producers were requested, pursuant to Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, to make themselves known within 15 days of the initiation of the expiry review and provide the Commission with the information requested in the notice of initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in če je, da bi lahko izbrala vzorec, so bili izvozniki/proizvajalci Skupnosti pozvani, da se v skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe v 15 dneh od začetka pregledov zaradi izteka ukrepov javijo Komisiji in ji predložijo podatke, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku.
However, no exporter/producer replied to the sampling questions or otherwise made itself known in response to the notice of initiation and, thus, sampling for exporters/producers was not at issue.
Vendar noben izvoznik/proizvajalec ni odgovoril na vprašanja o vzorčenju ali se drugače odzval na obvestilo o začetku postopka in zato vzorčenje za izvoznike/proizvajalce ni bilo sporno.
In view of the apparent large number of importers in the Community (33 listed in the review request), it was considered appropriate to examine whether sampling should be used in the expiry review in conformity with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi očitno velikega števila uvoznikov v LRK (33 navedenih v zahtevku za pregled) je bilo primerno, da se v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe prouči, ali je treba pri pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov uporabiti vzorčenje.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, importers in the Community were requested, pursuant to Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, to make themselves known within 15 days of the initiation of the expiry review and provide the Commission with the information requested in the notice of initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in če je, da bi lahko izbrala vzorec, so bili uvozniki v Skupnosti pozvani, da se v skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe v 15 dneh od začetka pregledov zaradi izteka ukrepov javijo Komisiji in ji predložijo podatke, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku.
However, since only three out of the 33 importers which were contacted replied to the sampling questions and agreed to cooperate, it was decided that sampling was not warranted in this case.
Vendar, ker so samo trije od 33 uvoznikov, s katerimi je Komisija vzpostavila stik, odgovorili na vprašanja o vzorčenju in privolili v sodelovanje, je bilo odločeno, da vzorčenje v tem primeru ni upravičeno.
Questionnaires were sent to the representatives of the exporting country and to all known importers, suppliers, producers, users in the Community and producers in the analogue country, the United States of America (USA) (see recitals 22 to 24).
Vprašalniki so bili poslani predstavnikom države izvoznice in vsem znanim uvoznikom, dobaviteljem, proizvajalcem, uporabnikom v Skupnosti in proizvajalcem v primerljivi državi, Združenih državah Amerike („ZDA“) (glej uvodne izjave 22 do 24 spodaj).
Complete replies to the questionnaires were received from three suppliers of raw materials to the Community industry, three users, two Community producers supporting the request for the review, one additional producer opposing the proceeding and one producer in the analogue country.
Vprašalnike so v celoti izpolnili trije dobavitelji surovin industriji Skupnosti, trije uporabniki, dva proizvajalca Skupnosti, ki podpirata zahtevek za pregled, en dodatni proizvajalec, ki nasprotuje postopku, in en proizvajalec v primerljivi državi.
No exporting producer in the PRC cooperated.
Sodeloval ni noben proizvajalec izvoznik v LRK.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for its analysis and carried out verification visits at the premises of the following companies:
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za njeno analizo, ter opravila preveritvene obiske v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Norit BV, Amersfoort, the Netherlands, and Glasgow, United Kingdom,
Norit B.V., Amersfoort, Nizozemska, in Glasgow, Združeno kraljestvo
CECA SA, Paris and Bordeaux, France,
CECA S.A., Pariz in Bordeaux, Francija
Other producer
Drug proizvajalec
Chemviron Carbon SA, Feluy, Belgium,
Chemviron Carbon S.A., Feluy, Belgija
Community suppliers
Dobavitelji Skupnosti
Klasmann & Deilmann GmbH, Geeste, Niedersachsen, Germany,
Klasmann & Deilmann GmbH, Geeste, Niedersachsen, Nemčija
Rheinbraun Brennstoff GmbH, Cologne, Germany,
Rheinbraun Brennstoff GmbH, Köln, Nemčija
WTL International Ltd, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom,
WTL International Ltd., Macclesfield, Cheshire, Združeno kraljestvo
The investigation of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2007 (review investigation period or RIP).
Preiskava glede verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. aprila 2006 do 31. marca 2007 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2003 up to the end of the RIP (period considered).
Preučevanje trendov, ki so pomembni za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajemalo obdobje od 1. januarja 2003 do konca OPP („obravnavano obdobje“).
The product under consideration is the same as in the original investigation and the subsequent expiry review, i.e. powdered activated carbon (PAC) currently classifiable within CN code ex38021000.
Zadevni izdelek je enak kot v prvi preiskavi in naknadnem pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov, to je aktivno oglje v prahu, trenutno uvrščen pod oznako KN ex38021000.
PAC is a micro-porous form of carbon, obtained from a variety of raw materials such as coal, lignite, peat, wood, olive stones or coconut shells, which are activated by means of steam or chemical processes.
Aktivno oglje v prahu je mikroporozna oblika oglja, pridobljenega iz različnih surovin, kot so premog, šota, les, olivne koščice ali kokosove lupine, ki se aktivirajo s paro ali kemijskim postopkom.
PAC is a very fine powder.
Aktivno oglje v prahu je zelo fin prah.
Activated carbons are also sold in granular forms (granulated activated carbon GAC) which are not covered by the measures in force or by this review.
Aktivna oglja se prodajajo tudi v zrnatih oblikah (granulirano aktivno oglje), ki niso zajete v veljavnih ukrepih niti v tem pregledu.
As confirmed by the previous expiry review PAC is defined as consisting of at least 90 % by mass (% m/m) of particles with a size less than 0,5 mm.
Kot je bilo potrjeno v prejšnjem pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov, je aktivno oglje v prahu sestavljeno iz najmanj 90 masnih odstotkov (% m/m) delcev velikosti manj kot 0,5 mm.
The general applications of PAC are water treatment (potable water as well as treatment of waste water), gas and air purification, solvent recovery, decolourisation of sugar, vegetable oils and fats, deodorisation and purification of different products in the chemical (i.e. organic acids), pharmaceutical (i.e. gastrointestinal capsules) and food industries (i.e. alcoholic and soft drinks).
Aktivno oglje v prahu se splošno uporablja za obdelavo vode (obdelava pitne vode in odpadne vode), čiščenje plinov in zraka, zajem topil, razbarvanje sladkorja, rastlinskih olj in maščob, odstranjevanje smradu in čiščenje različnih izdelkov v kemični (npr. organskih kislin), farmacevtski (npr. kapsul za prebavni trakt) in živilski industriji (npr. alkoholne in brezalkoholne pijače).
The present investigation has confirmed that PAC produced and sold by Community producers and PAC imported from the PRC as well as PAC produced and sold in the analogue country (USA) share the same basic physical and technical characteristics and are in all respects identical.
Sedanja preiskava je potrdila, da imajo aktivno oglje v prahu, ki ga proizvajajo in prodajajo proizvajalci Skupnosti, in aktivno oglje v prahu, uvoženo iz LRK, kot tudi aktivno oglje v prahu, ki ga proizvajajo in prodajajo v primerljivi državi (ZDA) enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti in so v vseh pogledih enaki.
Therefore, they are considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Navedeni izdelki se zato štejejo za podobne izdelke v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the purpose of an expiry review is to determine whether the expiry of the measures is likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping.
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe je namen pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov ugotoviti, ali je verjetno, da se bo zaradi izteka veljavnosti ukrepov damping nadaljeval ali ponovil.
At the outset, the volumes exported to the Community during the RIP were examined.
Na začetku je bil preučen obseg izvoza v Skupnost med OPP.
It should be noted that, since none of the Chinese exporting producers or any importer in the Community cooperated with the present investigation, export data were established in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, i.e. on the basis of information available.
Treba je opomniti, da so bili izvozni podatki določeni v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe, to je na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij, saj v sedanji preiskavi ni sodeloval nobeden od kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov niti nobeden uvoznik v Skupnosti.
In this respect, it is recalled that no Chinese exporting producer or Community importer had also cooperated with the first expiry review investigation.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da tudi v prvi preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepov ni sodeloval noben kitajski izvoznik ali uvoznik Skupnosti.
However, since the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty in 1996, Eurostat statistics have been available for imports of PAC.
Vendar je bila po uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve v letu 1996 na voljo statistika Eurostata o uvozu aktivnega oglja v prahu.
These statistics have been confirmed by market research information submitted by the Community industry.
Zadevne statistične podatke so potrdile tudi informacije iz tržnih raziskav, ki jih je predložila industrija Skupnosti.