natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As the average of the import duties calculated differs by more than EUR 5/tonne from that fixed, a corresponding adjustment must be made to the import duties fixed by Regulation (EC) No 838/2009.
Ker izračunano povprečje uvoznih dajatev za 5 EUR/t odstopa od določene dajatve, je potrebna prilagoditev uvoznih dajatev, določenih v Uredbi (ES) št. 838/2009.
Regulation (EC) No 838/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Uredbo (ES) št. 838/2009 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Annexes I and II to Regulation (EC) No 838/2009 are hereby replaced by the text in the Annex to this Regulation.
Prilogi I in II k Uredbi (ES) št. 838/2009 se nadomestita z besedilom iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
It shall apply from 18 September 2009.
Uporablja se od 18. septembra 2009.
OJ L 244, 16.9.2009, p. 3.
UL L 244, 16.9.2009, str. 3.
Import duties on the products referred to in Article 136(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 applicable from 18 September 2009
Uvozne dajatve za proizvode iz člena 136(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007, ki se uporabljajo od 18. septembra 2009
Commission Regulation (EC) No 858/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 858/2009
This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 September 2009.
Ta uredba začne veljati 19. septembra 2009.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 859/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 859/2009
amending Regulation (EC) No 244/2009 as regards the ecodesign requirements on ultraviolet radiation of non-directional household lamps
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 244/2009 v zvezi z zahtevami za okoljsko primerno zasnovo glede ultravijoličnega sevanja neusmerjenih svetil v gospodinjstvu
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 244/2009 of 18 March 2009 implementing Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for non-directional household lamps [2],
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 244/2009 z dne 18. marca 2009 o izvajanju Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2005/32/ES v zvezi z zahtevami za okoljsko primerno zasnovo neusmerjenih svetil v gospodinjstvu [2],
According to evidence produced after the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 244/2009, the limit set in Table 5 of the Regulation regarding ultraviolet radiation of the UVC type cannot be met by tungsten halogen lamps without a second lamp envelope (notably mains voltage halogen lamps with G9 and R7s caps but also extra low voltage halogen lamps).
Glede na dokaze, predložene po sprejetju Uredbe (ES) št. 244/2009, volframske/halogenske žarnice brez drugega ovoja sijalke (zlasti halogenske žarnice z vznožkoma G9 in R7s za omrežno napetost kot tudi halogenske žarnice za zelo nizko napetost) ne morejo izpolnjevati zahtev iz preglednice 5 uredbe glede ultravijoličnega sevanja vrste UVC.
This would result in banning those lamps from the internal market from 1 September 2009.
Zaradi tega bi bilo dajanje navedenih žarnic na notranji trg od 1. septembra 2009 prepovedano.
The phasing out of G9 and R7s cap lamps is considered only in a longer term, as they are widely used and there is presently no suitable replacement available that would fit into the luminaires designed for such lamps.
Postopni umik žarnic z vznožkoma G9 in R7s se načrtuje le dolgoročno, saj se široko uporabljajo in trenutno ni na voljo primernega nadomestka, ki bi se prilegal svetilom, namenjenim za tovrstne žarnice.
Recital 21 of Regulation (EC) No 244/2009 states that the requirements of the measure allow halogen lamps of socket G9 and R7s to remain on the market for a limited period of time.
V uvodni izjavi 21 Uredbe (ES) št. 244/2009 je navedeno, da lahko v skladu z zahtevami iz ukrepa halogenska svetila z okovoma G9 in R7s v omejenem obdobju še vedno ostanejo na trgu.
There is no indication in the Regulation of the length of this time period, however it was not the intention to ban these lamps on 1 September 2009 on the basis of UVC radiation, in case they comply with the other requirements of the Regulation.
Dolžina tega obdobja v uredbi ni navedena, vendar ni bilo predvideno, da se ta svetila prepovejo s 1. septembrom 2009 na podlagi sevanja UVC, če izpolnjujejo druge zahteve iz uredbe.
Article 15 of Directive 2005/32/EC requires that the ecodesign requirements should not affect functionality from the user’s perspective, should not entail excessive costs, should not have a significant negative impact on industry’s competitiveness, and should be established taking into account relevant Community legislation.
V skladu s členom 15 Direktive 2005/32/ES zahteve za okoljsko primerno zasnovo ne smejo vplivati na uporabnost z vidika uporabnika, ne smejo povzročati pretiranih stroškov, ne smejo imeti občutnega negativnega vpliva na konkurenčnost industrije ter se morajo določiti ob upoštevanju ustrezne zakonodaje Skupnosti.
It is important to ensure that lamps placed on the EU market are safe for use.
Pomembno je zagotoviti, da so svetila, ki se dajejo na trg EU, varna za uporabo.
Directive 2006/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the harmonisation of the laws of Member States relating to electrical equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits [3] (Low Voltage Directive) regulates the radiation of electrical equipment designed for use with a voltage rating of between 50 and 1000 V for alternating current and between 75 and 1500 V for direct current.
Direktiva 2006/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o uskladitvi zakonodaje držav članic v zvezi z električno opremo, konstruirano za uporabo znotraj določenih napetostnih mej [3] (Direktiva o nizki napetosti) ureja sevanje električne opreme, namenjene za uporabo z napetostjo med 50 in 1000 volti za izmenični tok in med 75 in 1500 volti za enosmerni tok.
UV radiation limits are set in related harmonised standards for both mains voltage and extra low voltage (such as 12 V and 24 V) tungsten halogen lamps, but not for compact fluorescent lamps.
Mejne vrednosti za sevanje UV so določene v ustreznih usklajenih standardih za volframske/halogenske žarnice za omrežno napetost in za zelo nizko napetost (npr. 12 V in 24 V), ne pa za kompaktne fluorescenčne sijalke.
More fundamentally, Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety [4] requires that products placed on the market are safe.
Poleg tega Direktiva 2001/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 3. decembra 2001 o splošni varnosti [4] zahteva, da so proizvodi, ki se dajejo na trg, varni.
It is necessary to ensure coherence between Regulation (EC) No 244/2009 and other Community legislation affecting the UV radiation of non-directional household lamps.
Treba je zagotoviti skladnost med Uredbo (ES) št. 244/2009 in drugo zakonodajo Skupnosti v zvezi s sevanjem UV neusmerjenih svetil v gospodinjstvu.
Regulation (EC) No 244/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Zato je treba Uredbo (ES) št. 244/2009 ustrezno spremeniti.
Amendment to Regulation (EC) No 244/2009
Sprememba Uredbe (ES) št. 244/2009
Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 244/2009 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga II k Uredbi (ES) št. 244/2009 se spremeni, kakor je določeno v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the first day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta uredba začne veljati prvi dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Table 5 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 244/2009 is replaced by the following:
Preglednica 5 Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 244/2009 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Rated lamp lifetime
Ocenjena življenjska doba svetila
Lumen maintenance
Vzdrževanje svetilnosti
Number of switching cycles
Število ciklov vklapljanja in izklapljanja
Starting time
Čas zagona
Lamp warm-up time to 60 % Φ
Čas ogrevanja svetila do 60 % Φ
Premature failure rate
Stopnja prezgodnje odpovedi
Lamp power factor
Faktor moči svetila
Commission Regulation (EC) No 860/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 860/2009
on the issue of licences for importing rice under the tariff quotas opened for the September 2009 subperiod by Regulation (EC) No 1529/2007
o izdaji uvoznih dovoljenj za riž v okviru tarifnih kvot, odprtih z Uredbo (ES) št. 1529/2007 za podobdobje september 2009
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1529/2007 of 21 December 2007 opening and providing for the administration in 2008 and 2009 of import quotas for rice originating in the ACP States which are part of the Cariforum region and the overseas countries and territories (OCTs) [2], and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1529/2007 z dne 21. decembra 2007 o odprtju in upravljanju uvoznih kvot za riž s poreklom iz afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav (AKP), ki so del regije Cariforum, ter čezmorskih držav in ozemelj (ČDO) za leti 2008 in 2009 [2] in zlasti člena 4(1) Uredbe,
Regulation (EC) No 1529/2007 opens and provides for the administration of an annual import tariff quota for 2009 of 250000 tonnes of rice, in husked-rice equivalent, originating in States that are part of the Cariforum region (order number 09.4220), an import tariff quota of 25000 tonnes of rice, in husked-rice equivalent, originating in the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba (order number 09.4189) and an import tariff quota of 10000 tonnes of rice, in husked-rice equivalent, originating in the least-developed OCTs (order number 09.4190).
Uredba (ES) št. 1529/2007 je za leto 2009 odprla in določila letno tarifno kvoto za uvoz 250000 ton riža, izraženo v protivrednosti oluščenega riža, s poreklom iz držav, ki so del regije Cariforum (zaporedna številka 09.4220), tarifno kvoto za uvoz 25000 ton riža, izraženo v protivrednosti oluščenega riža, s poreklom iz Nizozemskih Antilov in Arube (zaporedna številka 09.4189) in tarifno kvoto za uvoz 10000 ton riža, izraženo v protivrednosti oluščenega riža, s poreklom iz najmanj razvitih ČDO (zaporedna številka 09.4190).
The notification sent in accordance with Article 6(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1529/2007 shows that, for the quotas with order numbers 09.4220 – 09.4189 – 09.4190, the applications lodged in the first seven days of September 2009 under Article 2(1) of the Regulation cover a quantity, in husked-rice equivalent, less than that available.
Sporočilo v skladu s členom 6(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 1529/2007 navaja, da zahtevki za kvote z zaporednimi številkami 09.4220 – 09.4189 – 09.4190, predloženi v prvih sedmih dneh meseca septembra 2009 v skladu s členom 2(1) navedene uredbe, zajemajo količino v enakovredni količini oluščenega riža, ki je nižja od razpoložljive količine.
The total quantities available for the following subperiod should therefore be fixed for the quotas with order numbers 09.4189 – 09.4190, in accordance with Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1529/2007,
Za kvoti z zaporednima številkama 09.4189 – 09.4190 je treba v skladu s členom 4(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1529/2007 določiti skupni razpoložljivi količini za naslednje kvotno podobdobje –
Quantities to be allocated for the September 2009 subperiod and quantities available for the following subperiod under Regulation (EC) No 1529/2007
Količine, ki se dodelijo za podobdobje september 2009, in razpoložljive količine za naslednje podobdobje v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1529/2007
Allocation coefficient for the September 2009 subperiod
Koeficient dodelitve za podobdobje september 2009
Quantities available for the October 2009 subperiod (kg)
Skupne razpoložljive količine za podobdobje oktober 2009 (v kg)
States that are part of the Cariforum region (Article 1(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1529/2007)
Države, ki so del regije Cariforum (člen 1(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 1529/2007)
Least-developed OCTs:
manj razvite ČDO
No allocation coefficient applied for this subperiod: No licence applications were sent to the Commission.
Za to podobdobje se koeficient dodelitve ne uporablja: Komisiji ni bil predložen noben zahtevek za izdajo dovoljenja.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 861/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 861/2009
establishing a prohibition of fishing for Spurdog/dogfish in EC and international waters of I, V, VI, VII, VIII, XII and XIV by vessels flying the flag of the Netherlands
o prepovedi ribolova na trneža v vodah ES ter mednarodnih vodah con I, V, VI, VII, VIII, XII in XIV s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavo Nizozemske
Spurdog/dogfish (Squalus acanthias)
trnež (Squalus acanthias)
EC and international waters of I, V, VI, VII, VIII, XII and XIV
vode ES ter mednarodne vode con I, V, VI, VII, VIII, XII in XIV
27 May 2009
maja 2009
Council Regulation (EC) No 862/2009
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 862/2009
terminating the partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1487/2005 on imports of certain finished polyester filament fabrics originating in the People’s Republic of China
o zaključku delnega vmesnega pregleda protidampinških ukrepov, uvedenih z Uredbo (ES) št. 1487/2005 na uvoz nekaterih dokončanih tkanin iz poliestrskih filamentov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Article 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), in zlasti člena 11(3) Uredbe,
By Regulation (EC) No 1487/2005 [2] (the original Regulation), the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain finished polyester filament fabrics (‘PFF’ or ‘the product concerned’) originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’ or ‘the country concerned’).
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1487/2005 [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prvotna uredba) je Svet uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih dokončanih tkanin iz poliestrskih filamentov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: TPF ali zadevni izdelek) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (v nadaljnjem besedilu: LRK ali zadevna država).
The investigation period used in the investigation that led to the aforesaid Regulation (the original investigation) was the period from 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004 (the original IP).
Obdobje preiskave, uporabljeno v preiskavi, ki je privedla do prej navedene uredbe (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prvotna preiskava), je bilo od 1. aprila 2003 do 31. marca 2004 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prvotno OP).
Following an anti-absorption reinvestigation, these measures were amended by Regulation (EC) No 1087/2007 [3].
Po ponovni preiskavi za ugotavljanje absorpcije dajatev so bili ti ukrepi spremenjeni z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1087/2007 [3].
The duty rates currently in force range from 14,1 % to 74,8 %.
Trenutno veljavne stopnje dajatev se gibljejo med 14,1 % do 74,8 %.
On 1 April 2008, the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation to initiate a partial interim review to examine whether certain product types fall within the scope of the current anti-dumping measures.
Komisija je 1. aprila 2008 prejela zahtevek v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe za začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda, da bi preverila, ali nekatere vrste izdelka spadajo v obseg trenutno veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov.
The request was lodged by Hüpeden GmbH & Co. KG (the applicant), an importer located in Germany.
Zahtevek je vložila družba Hüpeden GmbH & Co. KG (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vložnik), uvoznik iz Nemčije.
The applicant alleged that the product it imports is only used to produce a special adhesive tape for insulation of cables within the wiring harnesses of engines, mainly engines of cars (hereinafter ‘tape’ grade), and that the technical and chemical characteristics of this ‘tape’ grade are different from those of the product concerned as defined in the original investigation.
Vložnik je trdil, da se izdelek, ki ga uvaža, domnevno uporablja samo za proizvodnjo posebnega lepilnega traku za izolacijo kablov v žični napeljavi motorjev, predvsem avtomobilskih (v nadaljnjem besedilu: izdelek kakovosti „trak“), ter da se tehnične in kemične lastnosti izdelka kakovosti „trak“ razlikujejo od lastnosti zadevnega izdelka, kot je bil opredeljen v prvotni preiskavi.
In particular, the tensile strength and the colouring of ‘tape’ grade seemed to be different.
Zlasti naj bi se izdelek kakovosti „trak“ razlikoval po natezni trdnosti in barvi.
The applicant alleged that ‘tape’ grade should therefore be considered as being outside the scope of the original investigation and thus not be subject to the abovementioned measures.
Vložnik je trdil, da zato izdelka kakovosti „trak“ ne bi smeli šteti v obseg prvotne preiskave in tako zanj ne bi smeli veljati zgoraj navedeni ukrepi.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed to justify the initiation of a partial interim review, the Commission announced by a notice published on 26 June 2008 in the Official Journal of the European Union [4] the initiation of a partial interim review in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, limited to the examination of the product scope.
Po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom je Komisija ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi, ki upravičujejo začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda, zato je z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije26. junija 2008 [4], začela delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe, ki je bil omejen na preiskavo obsega izdelka.
In particular, the review had to determine whether or not ‘tape’ grade is part of the product concerned as defined in the original investigation.
Zlasti je bilo treba s pregledom ugotoviti, ali izdelek kakovosti „trak“ spada v zadevni izdelek, kakor je bil opredeljen v prvotni preiskavi.
The Commission officially advised the authorities of the PRC, and all other parties known to be concerned, namely exporting producers in the country concerned, producers as well as users and importers in the Community, of the initiation of the partial interim review investigation.
Komisija je o začetku delnega vmesnega pregleda uradno obvestila organe LRK in vse druge znane zadevne stranke, tj. proizvajalce izvoznike v zadevni državi ter proizvajalce, uporabnike in uvoznike v Skupnosti.
In view of the scope of the review, no investigation period was set for the purpose of this review.
Glede na obseg pregleda zanj ni bilo določeno obdobje preiskave.
The information received in the questionnaire replies covered the period from 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2008 (the period considered).
Informacije v izpolnjenih vprašalnikih so zajele obdobje od 1. julija 2007 do 30. junija 2008 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obravnavano obdobje).
For the period considered, information concerning sales/purchases volume and value, production volume and capacity for ‘tape’ grade and all PFF types was requested.
Za izdelek kakovosti „trak“ in vse vrste TPF je bilo treba predložiti informacije o obsegu in vrednosti prodaje/nabave, obsegu proizvodnje in zmogljivosti v obravnavanem obdobju.
In addition, the parties concerned were asked to comment on any differences or similarities between ‘tape’ grade and other types of PFF with respect to their production process, technical characteristics, end-uses, interchangeability, etc.
Poleg tega so bile zadevne stranke pozvane k predložitvi pripomb o kakršnih koli razlikah ali podobnostih med izdelkom kakovosti „trak“ in drugimi TPF glede na proizvodni postopek, tehnične značilnosti, končne uporabe, zamenljivost itd.
Questionnaire replies were received from the applicant, one Chinese exporting producer of ‘tape’ grade, one Community producer of ‘tape’ grade, two Community producers of other types of PFF and one user of ‘tape’ grade.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike so poslali vložnik, en kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik izdelka kakovosti „trak“, en proizvajalec izdelka kakovosti „trak“ iz Skupnosti, dva proizvajalca Skupnosti, ki proizvajata druge vrste TPF, ter en uporabnik izdelka kakovosti „trak“.
The Commission sought and verified all information deemed necessary for the purpose of the assessment as to whether there was a need for amendment of the scope of the existing anti-dumping measures and carried out verification visits at the premises of the following companies:
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za oceno, ali je treba spremeniti obseg obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov, in opravila preveritvene obiske v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Hüpeden GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany,
Hüpeden GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg, Nemčija,
TFE Textil, Nüziders, Austria,
TFE Textil, Nüziders, Avstrija,
Wujiang Glacier Fabrics, Wujiang, PRC.
Wujiang Glacier Fabrics, Wujiang, LRK.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the conclusions of the present review investigation were drawn (final disclosure).
Vse stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih so bili sprejeti sklepi sedanje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom (v nadaljnjem besedilu: dokončno razkritje).
The oral and written comments submitted by the parties have been duly considered and replied to in the recitals that follow.
Ustne in pisne pripombe, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane stranke, so bile ustrezno obravnavane in odgovori so navedeni v uvodnih izjavah v nadaljevanju.
The product concerned is, as defined in the original Regulation, woven fabrics of synthetic filament yarn containing 85 % or more by weight of textured and/or non textured polyester filament, dyed (including dyed white) or printed, originating in the PRC, currently falling within CN codes ex54075100, 54075200, 54075400, ex54076110, 54076130, 54076190, ex54076910, and ex54076990.
Zadevni izdelek, kakor je opredeljen v prvotni uredbi, so tkanine iz preje iz sintetičnih filamentov, ki vsebujejo 85 % ali več mas. % teksturiranih in/ali neteksturiranih poliestrskih filamentov, barvanih (vključno z beljenimi) ali potiskanih, s poreklom iz LRK, trenutno uvrščene pod oznake KN ex54075100, 54075200, 54075400, ex54076110, 54076130, 54076190, ex54076910 in ex54076990.
It was first examined whether ‘tape’ grade falls within the scope of the measures imposed on certain finished polyester filament fabrics originating in the PRC as described in the original Regulation.
Najprej se je preverilo, ali spada izdelek kakovosti „trak“ v obseg ukrepov, uvedenih na nekatere dokončane tkanine iz poliestrskih filamentov s poreklom v LRK, kakor so opisane v osnovni uredbi.
It was subsequently examined whether the product scope could be amended on the ground that ‘tape’ grade and the other types of PFF do not form a single product.
Nato se je proučilo, ali se lahko obseg izdelka spremeni na podlagi dejstva, da izdelek kakovosti „trak“ in druge vrste TPF ne predstavljajo enega samega izdelka.
Scope of the original investigation
Obseg prvotne preiskave
It is recalled that PFF are produced by weaving yarns of polyester into a fabric and applying a finishing to this fabric.
Spomniti je treba, da se TPF izdelujejo s tkanjem preje iz poliestra v tkanino, ki se nato dokončno obdela.
The yarns can be pre-dyed or not.
Preja je lahko predbarvana ali pa tudi ne.
The finishing consists generally of printing or dyeing the woven fabrics but further finishing can be applied to produce a peach skin effect or make the fabric, for instance, water-repellent.
Dokončna obdelava na splošno zajema tiskanje ali barvanje tkanine, vendar se tkanina lahko še dodatno obdela, da se ustvari učinek breskvinega olupka ali da se doseže na primer vodoodbojnost tkanine.
In recital 8 of the original Regulation it is mentioned that the product concerned should be distinguished from woven PFF of yarns of different colours, for which pre-dyed yarn is woven into cloth, and the design is created by weaving the pattern.
V uvodni izjavi 8 prvotne uredbe je navedeno, da je treba zadevni izdelek razlikovati tudi od TPF iz raznobarvne preje, pri katerih je predbarvana preja stkana v tkanino, oblika pa se ustvari s tkanjem vzorca.
These fabrics fall within CN codes 54075300 and 54076150 and are excluded from the scope of the product and thus from the anti-dumping measures in force.
Te tkanine se uvrščajo pod oznaki KN 54075300 in 54076150 in so izključene iz obsega izdelka ter s tem iz veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov.