natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The protection afforded by a Community trade mark, the function of which is in particular to guarantee the trade mark as an indication of origin, should be absolute in the case of identity between the mark and the sign and the goods or services.
Varstvo, ki ga zagotovi blagovna znamka Skupnosti in katere funkcija je še posebej v zagotavljanju blagovne znamke kot označbe izvora, bi moralo biti absolutno v primeru enakosti blagovne znamke in znaka ter blaga ali storitev.
The protection should apply also in cases of similarity between the mark and the sign and the goods or services.
Varstvo bi moralo veljati tudi v primerih podobnosti med blagovno znamko in znakom ter blagom ali storitvami.
An interpretation should be given of the concept of similarity in relation to the likelihood of confusion.
Podati je treba razlago pojma podobnosti v zvezi z verjetnostjo zmede.
The likelihood of confusion, the appreciation of which depends on numerous elements and, in particular, on the recognition of the trade mark on the market, the association which can be made with the used or registered sign, the degree of similarity between the trade mark and the sign and between the goods or services identified, should constitute the specific condition for such protection.
Verjetnost zmede, katere ugotavljanje je odvisno od številnih elementov, zlasti od prepoznavnosti blagovne znamke na tržišču, povezovanja, ki ga lahko povzroči uporabljen ali registriran znak, stopnje podobnosti med blagovno znamko ter označenim blagom in storitvami, bi moralo pomeniti poseben pogoj takšnega varstva.
It follows from the principle of free movement of goods that the proprietor of a Community trade mark must not be entitled to prohibit its use by a third party in relation to goods which have been put into circulation in the Community, under the trade mark, by him or with his consent, save where there exist legitimate reasons for the proprietor to oppose further commercialisation of the goods.
Iz načela prostega pretoka blaga izhaja, da imetnik blagovne znamke Skupnosti ne sme imeti pravice, da tretji osebi prepove njeno uporabo v zvezi z blagom, ki ga je imetnik dal v promet v Skupnosti s to blagovno znamko ali se je to zgodilo z njegovim soglasjem, razen če obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi, da imetnik nasprotuje nadaljnji komercializaciji blaga.
There is no justification for protecting Community trade marks or, as against them, any trade mark which has been registered before them, except where the trade marks are actually used.
Ni razloga za varstvo blagovnih znamk Skupnosti ali katere koli blagovne znamke, registrirane pred njimi, razen če se blagovne znamke dejansko uporabljajo.
A Community trade mark is to be regarded as an object of property which exists separately from the undertakings whose goods or services are designated by it.
Blagovna znamka Skupnosti bi se morala obravnavati kot predmet premoženja, ki obstaja ločeno od podjetij, katerih blago ali storitve označuje.
Accordingly, it should be capable of being transferred, subject to the overriding need to prevent the public being misled as a result of the transfer.
V skladu s tem bi morala biti prenosljiva zaradi prevladujoče potrebe po preprečitvi, da bi bila javnost zavedena kot posledica prenosa.
It should also be capable of being charged as security in favour of a third party and of being the subject matter of licences.
Prav tako bi bilo treba omogočiti, da se uporabi kot predmet zavarovanja v korist tretje stranke ter da je predmet licenc.
Administrative measures are necessary at Community level for implementing in relation to every trade mark the trade mark law created by this Regulation.
Upravni ukrepi na ravni Skupnosti so nujni za izvajanje prava o blagovnih znamkah, ustvarjenega s to uredbo, pri vsaki blagovni znamki.
It is therefore essential, while retaining the Community's existing institutional structure and balance of powers, to provide for an Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (trade marks and designs) which is independent in relation to technical matters and has legal, administrative and financial autonomy.
Nujno je torej, da se ob ohranjanju obstoječe institucionalne strukture in ravnovesja moči znotraj Skupnosti predvidi Urad za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (blagovne znamke in modeli), ki je neodvisen pri reševanju tehničnih problemov in je pravno, upravno in finančno samostojen.
To this end it is necessary and appropriate that that Office should be a body of the Community having legal personality and exercising the implementing powers which are conferred on it by this Regulation, and that it should operate within the framework of Community law without detracting from the competencies exercised by the Community institutions.
Torej je potrebno in primerno, da gre za telo Skupnosti s pravno osebnostjo in ki ima izvedbena pooblastila, ki mu jih podeljuje ta uredba, in da naj deluje v okviru zakonodaje Skupnosti, ne da bi se zmanjševale pristojnosti institucij Skupnosti.
It is necessary to ensure that parties who are affected by decisions made by the Office are protected by the law in a manner which is suited to the special character of trade mark law.
Potrebno je zagotoviti, da so stranke, ki jih zadevajo odločitve Urada, pravno varovane na način, prilagojen posebni naravi prava blagovnih znamk.
To that end provision is made for an appeal to lie from decisions of the examiners and of the various divisions of the Office.
Tako je poskrbljeno za pritožbo zoper odločitve preizkuševalcev in oddelkov Urada.
If the department whose decision is contested does not rectify its decision it is to remit the appeal to a Board of Appeal of the Office, which is to decide on it.
Oddelek, katerega odločitev se izpodbija, v primeru, da odločitve ne spremeni, naj preda pritožbo odborom za pritožbe Urada, ki o njej odloča.
Decisions of the Boards of Appeal are, in turn, amenable to actions before the Court of Justice of the European Communities, which has jurisdiction to annul or to alter the contested decision.
Odločitve odborov za pritožbe so podvržene postopkom pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti, ki je pristojno za razveljavitev ali spremembo izpodbijane odločitve.
Under the first subparagraph of Article 225(1) of the EC Treaty the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has jurisdiction to hear and determine at first instance the actions referred to in particular in Article 230 of the EC Treaty with the exception of those assigned to a judicial panel and those reserved in the Statute to the Court of Justice.
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 225(1) Pogodbe ES ima Sodišče prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti na prvi stopnji pristojnosti, ki jih Sodišču evropskih skupnosti podeljujejo pogodbe o ustanovitvi Skupnosti glede vloženih pritožb – zlasti po členu 230 Pogodbe ES, razen tistih, ki so dodeljeni sodnemu oddelku, in tistih, ki so v skladu s Statutom pridržani za Sodišče.
The jurisdiction which this Regulation confers on the Court of Justice to cancel and alter decisions of the Boards of Appeal should accordingly be exercised at first instance by the Court.
Pristojnost, ki jo ta uredba podeljuje Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti v zvezi z razveljavitvijo in spreminjanjem odločb pritožbenih sodišč, Sodišče ustrezno izvaja na prvi stopnji.
In order to strengthen the protection of Community trade marks the Member States should designate, having regard to their own national system, as limited a number as possible of national courts of first and second instance having jurisdiction in matters of infringement and validity of Community trade marks.
Države članice bi morale zaradi krepitve varstva blagovnih znamk Skupnosti ob upoštevanju lastnega nacionalnega sistema oblikovati kar najbolj omejeno število nacionalnih sodišč prve in druge stopnje s pristojnostmi v zadevah o kršitvah in veljavnosti blagovnih znamk Skupnosti.
Decisions regarding the validity and infringement of Community trade marks must have effect and cover the entire area of the Community, as this is the only way of preventing inconsistent decisions on the part of the courts and the Office and of ensuring that the unitary character of Community trade marks is not undermined.
Odločitve o veljavnosti in kršitvi blagovnih znamk Skupnosti morajo učinkovati in pokrivati celotno področje Skupnosti, saj je to edini način preprečevanja nedoslednih odločitev sodišč in Urada ter zagotavljanja, da enotna narava blagovnih znamk Skupnosti ni razvrednotena.
The provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters should apply to all actions at law relating to Community trade marks, save where this Regulation derogates from those rules.
Določbe, ki jih vsebuje Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah, bi morale veljati za vsa dejanja pred sodišči, povezana z blagovnimi znamkami Skupnosti, razen če ta uredba od te uredbe odstopa.
Contradictory judgments should be avoided in actions which involve the same acts and the same parties and which are brought on the basis of a Community trade mark and parallel national trade marks.
Izogniti se je treba nasprotujočim sodbam v tožbah, ki zadevajo ista dejanja in iste stranke in ki so vložene na podlagi blagovne znamke Skupnosti in paralelnih nacionalnih blagovnih znamk.
For this purpose, when the actions are brought in the same Member State, the way in which this is to be achieved is a matter for national procedural rules, which are not prejudiced by this Regulation, whilst when the actions are brought in different Member States, provisions modelled on the rules on lis pendens and related actions of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 appear appropriate.
Način doseganja tega namena, ko so tožbe vložene v isti državi članici, je stvar nacionalne procesne zakonodaje, na katero ta uredba ne vpliva, medtem ko se takrat, ko so tožbe vložene v različnih državah članicah, zdijo primerne določbe, izoblikovane na podlagi pravil o litispendenci in sorodnih tožbah iz Uredbe (ES) št. 44/2001.
In order to guarantee the full autonomy and independence of the Office, it is considered necessary to grant it an autonomous budget whose revenue comes principally from fees paid by the users of the system.
Za zagotovitev polne samostojnosti in neodvisnosti Urada velja, da mu je potrebno dodeliti samostojni proračun, katerega prihodki izvirajo predvsem iz pristojbin, ki jih plačujejo uporabniki sistema.
However, the Community budgetary procedure remains applicable as far as any subsidies chargeable to the general budget of the European Communities are concerned.
Proračunski postopek Skupnosti pa se uporablja pri subvencijah iz splošnega proračuna Evropskih skupnosti.
Moreover, the auditing of accounts should be undertaken by the Court of Auditors.
Poleg tega mora revizijo računovodskih izkazov izvajati Računsko sodišče.
Measures necessary for the implementation of this Regulation should be adopted, particularly as regards fees regulations and an Implementing Regulation, in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission,
Ukrepe, potrebne za izvajanje te uredbe, zlasti v zvezi s sprejetjem pravilnika o pristojbinah in izvedbene uredbe, se sprejme v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil -
Community trade mark
Blagovna znamka Skupnosti
A trade mark for goods or services which is registered in accordance with the conditions contained in this Regulation and in the manner herein provided is hereinafter referred to as a ‘Community trade mark’.
Blagovna znamka za blago ali storitve, ki je registrirana v skladu s pravili iz te uredbe in na način, predpisan s to uredbo, je v nadaljnjem besedilu „blagovna znamka Skupnosti“.
A Community trade mark shall have a unitary character.
Blagovna znamka Skupnosti je enotnega značaja.
It shall have equal effect throughout the Community: it shall not be registered, transferred or surrendered or be the subject of a decision revoking the rights of the proprietor or declaring it invalid, nor shall its use be prohibited, save in respect of the whole Community.
Na celotnem območju Skupnosti ima enak učinek: ne more se registrirati, prenesti, odpovedati ali biti predmet odločitve, ki razveljavlja pravice imetnika ali ugotavlja njeno ničnost, niti njena uporaba ne more biti prepovedana, razen za celotno območje Skupnosti.
This principle shall apply unless otherwise provided in this Regulation.
To načelo se uporablja v celoti, razen če je s to uredbo drugače določeno.
An Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (trade marks and designs), hereinafter referred to as ‘the Office’, is hereby established.
Ustanovi se Urad za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (blagovne znamke in modeli), v nadaljnjem besedilu „Urad“.
Capacity to act
Poslovna in procesna sposobnost
For the purpose of implementing this Regulation, companies or firms and other legal bodies shall be regarded as legal persons if, under the terms of the law governing them, they have the capacity in their own name to have rights and obligations of all kinds, to make contracts or accomplish other legal acts and to sue and be sued.
Za namene izvajanja te uredbe se gospodarske družbe ali podjetja in drugi pravni subjekti štejejo kot pravne osebe, če so po zakonu, ki ureja njihovo delovanje, sposobne v lastnem imenu imeti pravice in obveznosti vseh vrst, sklepati pogodbe ali izvajati druga pravna dejanja ter sposobne biti stranka v postopku.
THE LAW RELATING TO TRADE MARKS
PRAVO V ZVEZI Z BLAGOVNIMI ZNAMKAMI
Definition of a Community trade mark and obtaining a Community trade mark
Opredelitev in pridobitev blagovne znamke skupnosti
Signs of which a Community trade mark may consist
Znaki, ki lahko sestavljajo blagovno znamko Skupnosti
A Community trade mark may consist of any signs capable of being represented graphically, particularly words, including personal names, designs, letters, numerals, the shape of goods or of their packaging, provided that such signs are capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings.
Blagovna znamka Skupnosti je lahko sestavljena iz kakršnih koli znakov, ki jih je mogoče grafično predstaviti, kot so besede, vključno z osebnimi imeni, slike, črke, števila, oblika blaga ali njegove embalaže, če se s pomočjo teh znakov blago in storitve nekega podjetja lahko razlikujejo od blaga in storitev drugih podjetij.
Persons who can be proprietors of Community trade marks
Osebe, ki so lahko imetniki blagovnih znamk Skupnosti
Any natural or legal person, including authorities established under public law, may be the proprietor of a Community trade mark.
Imetnik blagovne znamke Skupnosti je lahko vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba, vključno z organi, ustanovljenimi po javnem pravu.
Means whereby a Community trade mark is obtained
Načini pridobivanja blagovne znamke Skupnosti
A Community trade mark shall be obtained by registration.
Blagovna znamka Skupnosti se pridobi z registracijo.
Absolute grounds for refusal
Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev
The following shall not be registered:
Kot blagovna znamka se ne registrirajo:
signs which do not conform to the requirements of Article 4;
znaki, ki ne ustrezajo zahtevam iz člena 4;
trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character;
znamke, ki so brez slehernega razlikovalnega učinka;
trade marks which consist exclusively of signs or indications which may serve, in trade, to designate the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, geographical origin or the time of production of the goods or of rendering of the service, or other characteristics of the goods or service;
znamke, ki jih sestavljajo izključno znaki ali podatki, ki lahko v gospodarskem prometu označujejo vrsto, kakovost, količino, namen, vrednost, geografski izvor ali čas proizvodnje blaga ali opravljanja storitve ali druge lastnosti blaga ali storitve;
trade marks which consist exclusively of signs or indications which have become customary in the current language or in the bona fide and established practices of the trade;
znamke, ki jih sestavljajo izključno znaki ali označbe, ki so postali običajni v jezikovni rabi ali v dobroverni ustaljeni praksi trgovanja;
the shape which results from the nature of the goods themselves;
oblike, ki izhaja iz same narave blaga, ali
the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result;
oblike blaga, ki je nujna za doseg tehničnega učinka, ali
the shape which gives substantial value to the goods;
oblike, ki blagu da bistveno vrednost;
trade marks which are contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality;
znamke, ki nasprotujejo javnemu redu ali sprejetim moralnim načelom;
trade marks which are of such a nature as to deceive the public, for instance as to the nature, quality or geographical origin of the goods or service;
znamke, ki zavajajo javnost, na primer glede narave, kakovosti ali geografskega izvora blaga ali storitve;
trade marks which have not been authorised by the competent authorities and are to be refused pursuant to Article 6ter of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Paris Convention’;
znamke, za katere ni bilo izdano dovoljenje pristojnih organov in morajo biti zavrnjene na podlagi člena 6ter Pariške konvencije za zaščito industrijske lastnine (v nadaljevanju Pariška konvencija);
trade marks which include badges, emblems or escutcheons other than those covered by Article 6ter of the Paris Convention and which are of particular public interest, unless the consent of the competent authority to their registration has been given;
znamke, ki vsebujejo znamenja, embleme ali grbe, ki niso zajeti v členu 6ter Pariške konvencije in ki imajo poseben javni pomen, razen če so pristojni organi zanje izdali dovoljenje za registracijo;
trade marks for wines which contain or consist of a geographical indication identifying wines or for spirits which contain or consist of a geographical indication identifying spirits with respect to such wines or spirits not having that origin;
znamke za vina, ki vsebujejo ali sestojijo iz geografske označbe za vina, ali znamke za žgane pijače, ki vsebujejo ali sestojijo iz geografske označbe za žgane pijače, če se nanašajo na vina ali žgane pijače, ki nimajo takega izvora;
trade marks which contain or consist of a designation of origin or a geographical indication registered in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs when they correspond to one of the situations covered by Article 13 of the said Regulation and regarding the same type of product, on condition that the application for registration of the trade mark has been submitted after the date of filing with the Commission of the application for registration of the designation of origin or geographical indication.
znamke, ki v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 510/2006 z dne 20. marca 2006 o zaščiti geografskih označb in označb porekla za kmetijske proizvode in živila, vsebujejo registrirano označbo porekla ali geografsko označbo ali so iz nje sestavljene, če ustrezajo enemu od dejanskih stanj iz člena 13 navedene uredbe in se nanašajo na isto vrsto proizvoda, pod pogojem, da je bila prijava za registracijo znamke predložena po datumu vložitve prijave za registracijo označbe porekla ali geografske označbe pri Komisiji.
Paragraph 1 shall apply notwithstanding that the grounds of non-registrability obtain in only part of the Community.
Odstavek 1 se uporablja ne glede na to, da razlogi proti registraciji obstajajo le v delu Skupnosti.
Paragraph 1(b), (c) and (d) shall not apply if the trade mark has become distinctive in relation to the goods or services for which registration is requested in consequence of the use which has been made of it.
Odstavek 1(b), (c) in (d) se ne uporablja, če je znamka z uporabo pridobila razlikovalni učinek za blago ali storitve, za katere se zahteva registracija.
Relative grounds for refusal
Relativni razlogi za zavrnitev
Upon opposition by the proprietor of an earlier trade mark, the trade mark applied for shall not be registered:
Ob ugovoru imetnika prejšnje blagovne znamke se znamka, za katero je vložena prijava, ne registrira v naslednjih primerih:
if it is identical with the earlier trade mark and the goods or services for which registration is applied for are identical with the goods or services for which the earlier trade mark is protected;
če je enaka prejšnji blagovni znamki in če so blago in storitve, za katere je registracija zahtevana, enaki blagu ali storitvam, za katere je varovana prejšnja blagovna znamka;
if because of its identity with, or similarity to, the earlier trade mark and the identity or similarity of the goods or services covered by the trade marks there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public in the territory in which the earlier trade mark is protected; the likelihood of confusion includes the likelihood of association with the earlier trade mark.
če zaradi enakosti ali podobnosti s prejšnjo blagovno znamko in enakosti ali podobnosti blaga ali storitev, ki jih označujejo blagovne znamke, obstaja verjetnost zmede v javnosti na ozemlju, na katerem je varovana prejšnja blagovna znamka; verjetnost zmede zajema verjetnost povezovanja s prejšnjo blagovno znamko.
For the purposes of paragraph 1, ‘earlier trade marks’ means:
Za namen odstavka 1 izraz „prejšnje blagovne znamke“ pomeni:
trade marks of the following kinds with a date of application for registration which is earlier than the date of application for registration of the Community trade mark, taking account, where appropriate, of the priorities claimed in respect of those trade marks:
blagovne znamke naslednje vrste z datumom zahtev za registracijo, ki predhodi datumu zahteve za registracijo blagovne znamke Skupnosti, ob upoštevanju, če je to primerno, predhodnih pravic, ki se zahtevajo v zvezi s to blagovno znamko:
trade marks registered in a Member State, or, in the case of Belgium, the Netherlands or Luxembourg, at the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property;
blagovne znamke, registrirane v državi članici, oziroma v primeru Belgije, Nizozemske ali Luksemburga, v Uradu Beneluksa za intelektualno lastnino (Office Benelux de la Propriété intellectuelle);
trade marks registered under international arrangements which have effect in a Member State;
blagovne znamke, registrirane po mednarodnih sporazumih, ki veljajo v državi članici;
trade marks registered under international arrangements which have effect in the Community;
blagovne znamke, ki so predmet mednarodne registracije z učinkom v Skupnosti;
applications for the trade marks referred to in subparagraph (a), subject to their registration;
prijave znamk iz pododstavka (a), če so registrirane;
trade marks which, on the date of application for registration of the Community trade mark, or, where appropriate, of the priority claimed in respect of the application for registration of the Community trade mark, are well known in a Member State, in the sense in which the words ‘well known’ are used in Article 6bis of the Paris Convention.
blagovne znamke, ki so na dan vložitve zahteve za registracijo blagovne znamke Skupnosti, ali, če je to primerno, zahteve za priznanje prednostne pravice v zvezi z zahtevo za registracijo blagovne znamke Skupnosti, ki je v državi članici znana v smislu izraza „znan“ v členu 6bis Pariške konvencije.
Upon opposition by the proprietor of the trade mark, a trade mark shall not be registered where an agent or representative of the proprietor of the trade mark applies for registration thereof in his own name without the proprietor's consent, unless the agent or representative justifies his action.
Ob ugovarjanju imetnika blagovne znamke se blagovna znamka ne registrira, če posrednik ali zastopnik imetnika blagovne znamke zahteva njeno registracijo v lastnem imenu brez imetnikovega soglasja, razen če posrednik ali zastopnik svoje ravnanje upraviči.