natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Member of the CNDD (PR to the UN)
Član CNDD (predstavnik pri ZN)
Pass.: R0003212
št. p. l.: R0003212
S-Lt.Cheikh Ahmed TOURÉ
Podporočnik Cheikh Ahmed TOURÉ
Commandant Aboubacar Biro CONDÉ
Major Aboubacar Biro CONDÉ
Pass.: 2443
št. p. l.: 2443
Presidential private office
Kabinet predsednika
Pass.: R0105758
št. p. l.: R0105758
State Secretary with responsibility for Strategic Issues and Sustainable Development
Državni sekretar, odgovoren za misije, strateška vprašanja in trajnostni razvoj
Pass.: R0020803
št. p. l.: R0020803
Special adviser to ‘Toumba’ Diakité
Posebni svetovalec „Toumbe“ Diakitéja
Pass.: R0000968
št. p. l.: R0000968
S Lt Marcel KOIVOGUI
Podporočnik Marcel KOIVOGUI
Deputy to Toumba Diakité
Pribočnik Toumbe Diakitéja
Pass.: R11914
št. p. l.: R11914
CNDD spokesman
Tiskovni predstavnik CNDD
Police Captain Théodore KOUROUMA
Policijski stotnik Théodore KOUROUMA
Pass.: Service R0001204
št. p. l.: Service R0001204
Council Joint Action 2009/795/CFSP
Skupni ukrep Sveta 2009/795/SZVP
repealing Joint Action 2007/677/CFSP on the European Union military operation in the Republic of Chad and in the Central African Republic
o razveljavitvi Skupnega ukrepa 2007/677/SZVP o vojaški operaciji Evropske unije v Republiki Čad in Srednjeafriški republiki
On 15 October 2007, the Council adopted Joint Action 2007/677/CFSP [1].
Svet je 15. oktobra 2007 sprejel Skupni ukrep 2007/677/SZVP [1].
By letter dated 7 July 2009 the EU Operation Commander notified the recovery of the EU force, and therefore Joint Action 2007/677/CFSP should be repealed, in accordance with Article 15(3) thereof.
Poveljnik operacije EU je v pismu z dne 7. julija 2009 obvestil o umiku sil EU in zato bi bilo treba Skupni ukrep 2007/677/SZVP razveljaviti v skladu s členom 15(3) Skupnega ukrepa.
Council Decision 2008/975/CFSP of 18 December 2008 establishing a mechanism to administer the financing of the common costs of European Union operations having military or defence implications (ATHENA) [3] determines the procedures for the audit and presentation of the accounts of an operation,
V Sklepu Sveta 2008/975/SZVP z dne 18. decembra 2008 o določitvi mehanizma za upravljanje financiranja skupnih stroškov operacij Evropske unije, ki so vojaškega ali obrambnega pomena (Athena) [3], so določeni postopki za revizijski pregled in predložitev računov operacije –
Joint Action 2007/677/CFSP is hereby repealed.
Skupni ukrep 2007/677/SZVP se razveljavi.
This repeal shall be without prejudice to the procedures laid down in Decision 2008/975/CFSP regarding the audit and presentation of the accounts of the operation.
Ta razveljavitev ne posega v postopke v zvezi z revizijskim pregledom in predložitvijo računov operacije iz Sklepa 2008/975/SZVP.
OJ L 34, 8.2.2008, p. 39.
UL L 34, 8.2.2008, str. 39.
OJ L 345, 23.12.2008, p. 96.
UL L 345, 23.12.2008, str. 96.
The EU military operation in the Republic of Chad and in the Central African Republic (Operation EUFOR Tchad/RCA) was launched on 28 January 2008 by Council Decision 2008/101/CFSP [2] and ended on 15 March 2009.
Vojaška operacija EU v Republiki Čad in Srednjeafriški republiki (Operacija EUFOR Tchad/RCA) se je začela 28. januarja 2008 s Sklepom Sveta 2008/101/SZVP [2], končala pa 15. marca 2009.
Subsequently all forces have been redeployed from the area of operations.
Nato so bile vse sile prerazporejene z območja operacij.
Council Joint Action 2009/834/CFSP
Skupni ukrep Sveta 2009/834/SZVP
On 20 July 2001 the Council adopted Joint Action 2001/555/CFSP on the establishment of a European Union Satellite Centre [1].
Svet je 20. julija 2001 sprejel Skupni ukrep 2001/555/SZVP o ustanovitvi Satelitskega centra Evropske unije [1].
On 3 September 2009 the Political and Security Committee (PSC) agreed that all members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation should be entitled to be involved in the Centre’s activities and that products of the Centre resulting from requests by the Council could be distributed to third States by decision of the PSC.
Politični in varnostni odbor (PVO) se je 3. septembra 2009 dogovoril, da bi morale imeti vse članice Organizacije Severnoatlantske pogodbe (Nato) pravico do vključitve v dejavnosti centra in da bi se lahko proizvodi centra, ki nastanejo kot posledica zahtev Sveta, s sklepom PVO posredovali tretjim državam.
Joint Action 2001/555/CFSP should be amended accordingly,
Skupni ukrep 2001/555/SZVP bi bilo treba skladno s tem spremeniti –
in Article 5, the following paragraph shall be added:
v členu 5 se doda naslednji odstavek:
The Political and Security Committee may direct the Secretary-General/High Representative to make available products of the Centre resulting from requests made in accordance with Article 2(1) to any designated third State on a case-by-case basis.’;
Politični in varnostni odbor lahko usmeri generalnega sekretarja/visokega predstavnika, da da na voljo proizvode centra, ki izhajajo iz zahtev na podlagi člena 2(1), vsaki določeni tretji državi na podlagi obravnave vsakega primera posebej.“;
Association of third States
Vključevanje tretjih držav
Notwithstanding Article 5, non-EU NATO members and other States which are candidates for accession to the EU shall be entitled to be involved in the Centre’s activities in accordance with the Provisions set out in the Annex.’.
Ne glede na člen 5 imajo članice Nata, ki niso članice EU, in druge države kandidatke za vstop v EU pravico biti udeležene pri dejavnosti centra v skladu z določbami iz Priloge.“
This Joint Action shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.
Ta skupni ukrep začne veljati z dnevom sprejetja.
Council Joint Action 2009/841/CFSP
Skupni ukrep Sveta 2009/841/SZVP
amending and extending Joint Action 2008/112/CFSP on the European Union mission in support of security sector reform in the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU)
o spremembi in podaljšanju Skupnega ukrepa 2008/112/SZVP o misiji Evropske unije v podporo reforme varnostnega sektorja v Republiki Gvineji-Bissau (EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU)
On 12 February 2008, the Council adopted Joint Action 2008/112/CFSP on the European Union Mission in support of security sector reform in the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU) [1].
Svet je 12. februarja 2008 sprejel Skupni ukrep 2008/112/SZVP o misiji Evropske unije v podporo reforme varnostnega sektorja v Republiki Gvineji-Bissau (EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU) [1].
That Joint Action was to apply until 31 May 2009.
Navedeni skupni ukrep naj bi se uporabljal do 31. maja 2009.
On 18 May 2009, the Council adopted Joint Action 2009/405/CFSP [2] amending Joint Action 2008/112/CFSP.
Svet je 18. maja 2009 sprejel Skupni ukrep Sveta 2009/405/SZVP [2] o spremembi Skupnega ukrepa 2008/112/SZVP.
That Joint Action is to apply until 30 November 2009.
Navedeni skupni ukrep naj bi se uporabljal do 30. novembra 2009.
By letter dated 9 October 2009, Guinea-Bissau invited the European Union to extend the Mission for six months until 31 May 2010.
Gvineja-Bissau je v pismu z dne 9. oktobra 2009 pozvala Evropsko unijo, naj misijo podaljša za šest mesecev, to je do 31. maja 2010.
Joint Action 2008/112/CFSP is hereby amended as follows:
Skupni ukrep 2008/112/SZVP se spremeni:
The European Union (EU) hereby establishes an EU Mission in support of security sector reform in the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (hereinafter referred to as “EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU” or the “Mission”), comprising a preparatory phase beginning on 26 February 2008 and with an implementation phase beginning no later than 1 May 2008.
Evropska unija (EU) ustanovi misijo EU v podporo reformi varnostnega sektorja v Gvineji-Bissau (v nadaljnjem besedilu ‚EU SSR GUINEA- BISSAU‘ ali ‚misija‘), ki obsega pripravljalno fazo, ki se začne 26. februarja 2008, in izvedbeno fazo, ki se začne najpozneje 1. maja 2008.
The duration of the Mission will be up to 24 months from the declaration of initial operational capability.’;
Misija bo trajala do 24 mesecev od izjave o pripravljenosti za začetek delovanja.“
The financial reference amount to cover the expenditure related to the Mission for the period from 26 February 2008 to 30 November 2009 shall be EUR 5650000.
Referenčni finančni znesek za kritje stroškov, povezanih z misijo za obdobje od 26. februarja 2008 do 30. novembra 2009, je 5650000 EUR.
The financial reference amount to cover the expenditure related to the Mission for the period from 1 December 2009 to 31 May 2010 shall be EUR 1530000.’;
Referenčni finančni znesek za kritje stroškov, povezanih z misijo za obdobje od 1. decembra 2009 do 31. maja 2010, je 1530000 EUR.“
in Article 17, the second subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:
V členu 17 se drugi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘It shall apply until 31 May 2010.’
„Uporablja se do 31. maja 2010.“
OJ L 128, 27.5.2009, p. 60.
UL L 128, 27.5.2009, str. 60.
Council Joint Action 2009/842/CFSP
Skupni ukrep Sveta 2009/842/SZVP
Council Decision 2008/884/CFSP of 21 November 2008 implementing Joint Action 2007/369/CFSP on the establishment of the European Union Police Mission in Afghanistan (EUPOL AFGHANISTAN) [2] provided a financial reference amount to cover expenditure related to the Mission from 1 December 2008 until 30 November 2009.
V Sklepu Sveta 2008/884/SZVP z dne 21. novembra 2008 o izvajanju Skupnega ukrepa 2007/369/SZVP o ustanovitvi policijske misije Evropske unije v Afganistanu (EUPOL AFGHANISTAN) [2] je določen finančni referenčni znesek za kritje odhodkov, povezanih z misijo v obdobju od 1. decembra 2008 do 30. novembra 2009.
That financial reference amount should be increased to cover the expenditure related to EUPOL AFGHANISTAN until 30 May 2010.
Navedeni finančni referenčni znesek bi bilo treba povečati za kritje odhodkov, povezanih z EUPOL AFGHANISTAN do 30. maja 2010.
EUPOL AFGHANISTAN should have a project cell for identifying and implementing projects, and provision should be made for establishing such a project cell.
EUPOL AFGHANISTAN bi moral imeti projektno enoto za določitev ter izvajanje projektov; sprejeti bi bilo treba določbo za vzpostavitev takšne projektne enote.
Paragraph 3 of Article 4 is replaced by the following:
V členu 4 se odstavek 3 nadomesti z naslednjim:
EUPOL AFGHANISTAN shall have a project cell for identifying and implementing projects.
EUPOL AFGHANISTAN ima projektno enoto za določitev in izvajanje projektov.
EUPOL AFGHANISTAN shall, as appropriate, coordinate, facilitate and provide advice on projects implemented by Member States and third states under their responsibility, in areas related to the Mission and in support of its objectives.’;
EUPOL AFGHANISTAN po potrebi poskrbi za usklajevanje, lažji potek in zagotavljanje svetovanja v zvezi s projekti, ki jih izvajajo države članice in tretje države pod njihovo odgovornostjo na področjih, povezanih z misijo, in v podporo njenim ciljem.“
Paragraph 2 of Article 13 is replaced by the following:
V členu 13 se odstavek 2 nadomesti z naslednjim:
The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUPOL AFGHANISTAN for the period from 1 December 2008 until 30 May 2010 shall be EUR 81400000.’.
Referenčni finančni znesek za kritje odhodkov v zvezi z misijo EUPOL AFGHANISTAN za obdobje od 1. decembra 2008 do 30. maja 2010 je 81400000 EUR.“
OJ L 316, 26.11.2008, p. 21.
UL L 316, 26.11.2008, str. 21.
Council Joint Action 2009/854/CFSP
Skupni ukrep Sveta 2009/854/SZVP
On 10 November 2008, the Council adopted Joint Action 2008/862/CFSP [2] amending and extending Joint Action 2005/889/CFSP until 24 November 2009.
Svet je 10. novembra 2008 sprejel Skupni ukrep 2008/862/SZVP [2] o spremembi in podaljšanju Skupnega ukrepa 2005/889/SZVP do 24. novembra 2009.
Joint Action 2005/889/CFSP should be further extended until 24 May 2010,
Skupni ukrep 2005/889/SZVP bi bilo treba podaljšati do 24. maja 2010 –
Article 13(1) is replaced by the following:
člen 13(1) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mission for the period from 25 November 2009 to 24 May 2010 shall be EUR 1120000’;
Referenčni finančni znesek za kritje odhodkov, povezanih z misijo, znaša za obdobje od 25. novembra 2009 do 24. maja 20101120000 EUR.“;
second paragraph of Article 16 is replaced by the following:
drugi odstavek člena 16 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘It shall expire on 24 May 2010.’;
„Veljati preneha 24. maja 2010.“;
Article 17 is replaced by the following:
člen 17 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
This Joint Action shall be reviewed by 15 April 2010.’.
Ta skupni ukrep se pregleda do 15. aprila 2010.“.
OJ L 306, 15.11.2008, p. 98.
UL L 306, 15.11.2008, str. 98.
Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2009/299/PNZ
amending Framework Decisions 2002/584/JHA, 2005/214/JHA, 2006/783/JHA, 2008/909/JHA and 2008/947/JHA, thereby enhancing the procedural rights of persons and fostering the application of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions rendered in the absence of the person concerned at the trial
o spremembi okvirnih sklepov 2002/584/PNZ, 2005/214/PNZ, 2006/783/PNZ, 2008/909/PNZ in 2008/947/PNZ zaradi krepitve procesnih pravic oseb ter spodbujanja uporabe načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb, izdanih na sojenju v odsotnosti zadevne osebe
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(1)(a) and Article 34(2)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti členov 31(1)(a) in 34(2)(b) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the initiative of the Republic of Slovenia, the French Republic, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Sweden, the Slovak Republic, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Federal Republic of Germany [1],
ob upoštevanju pobude Republike Slovenije, Francoske republike, Češke republike, Kraljevine Švedske, Slovaške republike, Združenega kraljestva in Zvezne republike Nemčije [1],
The right of an accused person to appear in person at the trial is included in the right to a fair trial provided for in Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights.
Pravica obtoženca, da je osebno navzoč na sojenju, je zagotovljena s pravico do poštenega sojenja iz člena 6 Konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, kakor jo razlaga Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice.
The Court has also declared that the right of the accused person to appear in person at the trial is not absolute and that under certain conditions the accused person may, of his or her own free will, expressly or tacitly but unequivocally, waive that right.
Prav tako je Sodišče določilo, da pravica obtoženca do tega, da je osebno navzoč na sojenju, ni absolutna ter da se lahko obtoženec pod nekaterimi pogoji po lastni volji izrecno ali molče, vendar nedvoumno, odpove tej pravici.
The various Framework Decisions implementing the principle of mutual recognition of final judicial decisions do not deal consistently with the issue of decisions rendered following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person.
Vprašanja odločb, izdanih v sojenju, na katerem zadevna oseba ni bila osebno navzoča, različni okvirni sklepi o izvajanju načela vzajemnega priznavanja pravnomočnih sodnih odločb ne obravnavajo enotno.
This diversity could complicate the work of the practitioner and hamper judicial cooperation.
Ta raznolikost bi lahko otežila delo pravnikov in ovirala pravosodno sodelovanje.
Solutions provided by these Framework Decisions are not satisfactory as regards cases where the person could not be informed of the proceedings.
Rešitve iz teh okvirnih sklepov niso zadovoljive, ko gre za primere, kjer oseba ni mogla biti obveščena o sodnem postopku.
Framework Decisions 2005/214/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties [2], 2006/783/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders [3], 2008/909/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union [4] and 2008/947/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments and probation decisions with a view to the supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions [5] allow the executing authority to refuse the execution of such judgments.
Okvirni sklepi 2005/214/PNZ o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja denarnih kazni [2], 2006/783/PNZ o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja odredb o zaplembi [3], 2008/909/PNZ o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja sodb v kazenskih zadevah, s katerimi so izrečene zaporne kazni ali ukrepi, ki vključujejo odvzem prostosti, za namen njihovega izvrševanja v Evropski uniji [4] in 2008/947/PNZ o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja sodb in pogojnih odločb zaradi zagotavljanja nadzorstva nad spremljevalnimi ukrepi in alternativnimi sankcijami [5] dopuščajo izvršitvenemu organu, da zavrne izvršitev takšnih sodb.
Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States [6] allows the executing authority to require the issuing authority to give an assurance deemed adequate to guarantee the person who is the subject of the European arrest warrant that he or she will have an opportunity to apply for a retrial of the case in the issuing Member State and to be present when the judgment is given.
Okvirni sklep 2002/584/PNZ o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami [6] dopušča izvršitvenemu organu, da od odreditvenega pravosodnega organa zahteva, naj z ustreznim zagotovilom zajamči, da bo oseba, za katero je izdan evropski nalog za prijetje, imela možnost zaprositi za ponovno sojenje zadeve v državi članici izdajateljici in biti navzoča pri izreku sodbe.
The adequacy of such an assurance is a matter to be decided by the executing authority, and it is therefore difficult to know exactly when execution may be refused.
Ustreznost takšnega zagotovila določi izvršitveni organ, zato je težko natančno vedeti, kdaj se izvršitev lahko zavrne.
It is therefore necessary to provide clear and common grounds for non-recognition of decisions rendered following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person.
Zato je treba določiti jasne in skupne razloge za zavrnitev priznanja odločb, izdanih v sojenju, na katerem zadevna oseba ni bila osebno navzoča.
This Framework Decision is aimed at refining the definition of such common grounds allowing the executing authority to execute the decision despite the absence of the person at the trial, while fully respecting the person’s right of defence.
Namen tega okvirnega sklepa je natančneje določiti opredelitev skupnih razlogov, ki bi izvršitvenemu organu omogočili, da izvrši odločbo kljub temu, da oseba ni bila navzoča na sojenju, pri tem pa v celoti spoštuje njeno pravico do obrambe.
This Framework Decision is not designed to regulate the forms and methods, including procedural requirements, that are used to achieve the results specified in this Framework Decision, which are a matter for the national laws of the Member States.
Ta okvirni sklep ni namenjen urejanju oblik in načinov ter procesnih zahtev, ki se uporabijo za dosego rezultatov, opredeljenih v tem okvirnem sklepu, saj se za njihovo določitev uporabljajo nacionalna prava držav članic.
Such changes require amendment of the existing Framework Decisions implementing the principle of mutual recognition of final judicial decisions.
Takšne spremembe zahtevajo spremembo obstoječih okvirnih sklepov o izvajanju načela vzajemnega priznavanja pravnomočnih sodnih odločb.
The new provisions should also serve as a basis for future instruments in this field.
Nove določbe bi morale biti tudi podlaga za prihodnje instrumente na tem področju.
The provisions of this Framework Decision amending other Framework Decisions set conditions under which the recognition and execution of a decision rendered following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person should not be refused.
Določbe tega okvirnega sklepa, ki spreminjajo druge okvirne sklepe, določajo pogoje, pod katerimi se priznanje in izvršitev odločbe, izdane v sojenju, na katerem zadevna oseba ni bila osebno navzoča, ne bi smela zavrniti.
These are alternative conditions; when one of the conditions is satisfied, the issuing authority, by completing the corresponding section of the European arrest warrant or of the relevant certificate under the other Framework Decisions, gives the assurance that the requirements have been or will be met, which should be sufficient for the purpose of the execution of the decision on the basis of the principle of mutual recognition.
Ti pogoji so alternativni; če je eden izmed pogojev izpolnjen, odreditveni organ z izpolnitvijo ustrezne rubrike evropskega naloga za prijetje ali potrdila, priloženega drugim okvirnim sklepom, jamči, da so bile ali bodo izpolnjene zahteve, ki naj bi zadostovale za izvršitev odločbe na podlagi načela vzajemnega priznavanja.
The recognition and execution of a decision rendered following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person should not be refused if either he or she was summoned in person and thereby informed of the scheduled date and place of the trial which resulted in the decision, or if he or she actually received, by other means, official information of the scheduled date and place of that trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he or she was aware of the scheduled trial.
Priznanje in izvršitev odločbe, izdane v sojenju, na katerem zadevna oseba ni bila osebno navzoča, se ne bi smela zavrniti, če je bila oseba osebno povabljena in s tem obveščena o predvidenem datumu in kraju sojenja, ki se je zaključilo z odločbo, ali če je bila zadevna oseba kako drugače uradno obveščena o predvidenem datumu in kraju sojenja, in sicer tako, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila ta oseba seznanjena z načrtovanim sojenjem.
In this context, it is understood that the person should have received such information ‘in due time’, meaning sufficiently in time to allow him or her to participate in the trial and to effectively exercise his or her right of defence.
V zvezi s tem se razume, da bi morala biti zadevna oseba o tem obveščena „pravočasno“, kar pomeni dovolj zgodaj, da se je lahko udeležila sojenja in učinkovito uveljavila svojo pravico do obrambe.
The right to a fair trial of an accused person is guaranteed by the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights.
Pravico obtoženca do poštenega sojenja zagotavlja Konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, kakor jo razlaga Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice.
This right includes the right of the person concerned to appear in person at the trial.
Ta pravica zajema pravico zadevne osebe, da je osebno navzoča na sojenju.
In order to exercise this right, the person concerned needs to be aware of the scheduled trial.
Da pa lahko zadevna oseba uveljavlja to pravico, mora biti seznanjena s predvidenim sojenjem.
Under this Framework Decision, the person’s awareness of the trial should be ensured by each Member State in accordance with its national law, it being understood that this must comply with the requirements of that Convention.
Po tem okvirnem sklepu bi morale države članice osebo seznaniti s sojenjem v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, pri čemer se razume, da je treba pri tem upoštevati zahteve iz navedene konvencije.
In accordance with the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, when considering whether the way in which the information is provided is sufficient to ensure the person’s awareness of the trial, particular attention could, where appropriate, also be paid to the diligence exercised by the person concerned in order to receive information addressed to him or her.
V skladu s sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice pa bi lahko pri ugotavljanju, ali je bil način obveščanja ustrezen, da se je oseba seznanila s sojenjem, posebno pozornost po potrebi namenili tudi prizadevanju zadevne osebe, da prejme informacije, ki so nanjo naslovljene.