natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Tar emitted during the coke production process is stored at a temperature of 70 °C.
Katran, ki se izloča med koksanjem, se ohranja pri temperaturi 70 °C.
The hot tar releases carcinogenic gases.
Iz vročega katrana se izločajo kancerogeni plini.
Lucchini decided to invest ITL 1427 billion (about EUR 700000) in an installation for collecting and burning these carcinogenic gas emissions.
Družba Lucchini je načrtovala naložbo v znesku 1,427 milijarde ITL (kar je približno 0,7 milijona EUR) za napravo za zbiranje in sežiganje kancerogenih izpustov plina.
The investment has no effect on the level of production.
Naložba ne vpliva na raven proizvodnje.
As a result of the investments in the gas purification system, there is a slight increase in the amount and value of the chemical substances that are extracted and sold.
Kar zadeva naložbe v sistem za prečiščevanje plinov, količina in vrednost izločenih in prodanih kemičnih spojin počasi narašča.
On the other hand, the constant monitoring needed for the new system generates much higher costs.
Nasprotno pa stalni nadzor, ki ga potrebuje nova naprava, pomeni veliko višje stroške.
There is therefore no overall production benefit that might have to be deducted.
Torej ni opaziti splošnih koristi za proizvodnjo, ki bi jih bilo treba odšteti.
Measurement of SO2 emissions
Merjenje izpustov SO2
An SO2 emission measurement system had to be installed to monitor SO2 emissions in the air.
Za nadzor izpustov SO2 v zrak je bilo treba namestiti napravo za merjenje teh izpustov.
The investment was undertaken for solely environmental purposes, and cost ITL 138 million (about EUR 70000).
Naložba je bila izvedena izključno iz okoljevarstvenih razlogov in je znašala 138 milijonov ITL (kar je približno 70000 EUR).
The measure had no effect on production.
Ukrep ni vplival na proizvodnjo.
Measures which would have been carried out in any event
Ukrepi, ki bi bili izvedeni v vsakem primeru
The Commission has concluded that the measures described below would have been carried out in any event, and consequently are not eligible for environmental aid.
Glede ukrepov, ki so opisani v nadaljevanju je Komisija ugotovila, da bi bili opravljeni v vsakem primeru in zato niso dopustni kot pomoči za varstvo okolja.
The investments represent a total of ITL 8,52 billion which cannot be approved as environmental aid since it did not have had any incentive effect.
Omenjene naložbe v višini 8,52 milijarde ITL zato ne morejo biti odobrene kot okoljevarstvene, saj nimajo nikakršnega spodbujevalnega učinka.
Sealing or partially or fully replacing the oven chambers
Zatesnitev ali delna oziroma popolna zamenjava opek v notranjosti peči
Lucchini decided to invest ITL 4241 billion (about EUR 2100000) in the repair of the oven chambers by resealing them or by partially or fully replacing the bricks.
Družba Lucchini se je odločila za naložbo v višini 4,241 milijarde ITL (kar znaša približno 2,1 milijona EUR) za popravilo notranjosti peči, z zatesnitvijo ali delno oziroma popolno zamenjavo opek.
The Commission considers that this investment was carried out for production reasons.
Po mnenju Komisije je bila naložba izvedena zaradi proizvodnih koristi.
In the first place, the Commission would point out that the battery itself is not part of the environmental equipment but is the very core of the installation.
Na prvem mestu Komisija ugovarja, da koksarniška baterija ni del „okoljevarstvene opreme“, ampak je jedro obrata.
Second, repair by sealing the bricks is part of the ordinary maintenance of a coking battery.
Na drugem mestu popravilo z zatesnitvijo opek sodi med običajna vzdrževalna dela na koksarniški bateriji.
When the company decided in 1999 to renovate the battery, the aim was to ensure that it continued to work for at least another 10 years.
Ko se je leta 1999 odločila za preureditev baterije, je družba nameravala zagotoviti njeno delovanje vsaj še naslednjih 10 let.
If rebricking was found necessary, rather than straightforward sealing, it can be assumed that the deterioration of the walls was already far advanced.
Če se je pokazala potreba po zamenjavi opek namesto njihove zatesnitve, lahko domnevamo, da je propadanje sten zelo napredovalo.
If the oven walls were in bad condition, there was a risk, for example, that they might bend inwards, so that the pushers would no longer be able to pass and push the coke out of the oven chamber.
Ker so bile stene komor peči v slabem stanju, je obstajala nevarnost, da bi se na primer upognile proti notranjosti in stroj za praznjenje peči ne bi mogel skozi, da bi potisnil koks iz peči.
The chamber would have become unusable.
V tem primeru peči ne bi več mogli uporabljati.
Such bending would also endanger the stability of the roof.
Deformacija bi ogrozila tudi stabilnost zgornjega dela peči.
Italy explained that the rebricking of the oven wall had an environmental aim.
Italija je trdila, da je bil namen posegov na opekah okoljevarstvene narave.
Where gas can circulate between the oven chamber and the burning chamber, gas entering the burning chamber alters the burning gas composition, and black smoke is emitted from the chimney.
Če bi plin prehajal iz peči v sežigalno komoro, bi se spremenila sestava plina za kurjenje in iz dimnikov bi se dvigal črn dim.
For the reasons set out above, the Commission takes the view that the investments would have been carried out in any event.
Komisija nasprotno meni, da bi bile naložbe uresničene v vsakem primeru zaradi zgoraj navedenih razlogov.
In its letter of 3 October 2007 the Commission gave Italy the opportunity to rebut the Commission’s observations, but Italy did not do so.
Z dopisom z dne 3. oktobra 2007 je imela Italija možnost ugovora na pripombe Komisije, vendar tega ni storila.
The Commission therefore considers that the rebricking of the oven walls would have been carried out in any event for economic reasons, in order to ensure continued production of coke on the site.
Komisija zato meni, da bi bili posegi na opekah na stenah peči opravljeni v vsakem primeru iz gospodarskih razlogov, oziroma, da bi zagotovili nadaljevanje proizvodnje koksa v obratu.
Reserve power generator
Namestitev rezervnega generatorja električne energije
It is true that power cuts have a negative impact on the environment, but the Commission considers that the installation of a fall-back generator was undertaken primarily for reasons linked to production.
Tudi če drži, da prekinitve toka slabo vplivajo na okolje, Komisija meni, da je bila namestitev rezervnega generatorja izvedena predvsem iz razlogov, ki se nanašajo na proizvodnjo.
Power cuts have a substantial impact on production, and a reserve generator would have been installed in any event.
Prekinitve toka imajo negativne učinke na proizvodnjo, zaradi česar bi bil rezervni generator nameščen v vsakem primeru.
The investment cost ITL 1,8 billion (about EUR 900000).
Znesek naložbe je bil 1,8 milijarde ITL (kar je približno 0,9 milijona EUR).
Filters for quenching emissions
Filtri za onesnažujoče izpuste, proizvedene med hlajenjem
Lucchini spent ITL 220 million (about EUR 110000) on new filters to filter the steam generated by the process of quenching the hot coke after it comes out of the ovens.
Družba Lucchini je potrošila 220 milijonov ITL (kar je približno 110000 EUR) za nakup novih filtrov za filtriranje pare, ki nastaja med hlajenjem koksa iz peči.
The Commission considers that the filters would have been replaced in any event, because they had reached the end of their useful life (20 years), as was confirmed by Italy during the on-site visit.
Po mnenju Komisije bi bili ti filtri zamenjani v vsakem primeru, saj so dosegli konec predvidene življenjske dobe (20 let), kar je Italija potrdila med ogledom na kraju samem.
Automation of coal levelling in the oven chambers
Avtomatizacija poravnave premoga v peči
Coal levelling in the oven chambers has environmental benefits.
Poravnava premoga v peči ima pozitiven vpliv na okolje.
But the investment involved here consisted only in the automation of a measure which had previously been carried out manually.
Zadevna naložba pa se je nanašala le na preprosto avtomatizacijo postopka, ki so ga prej opravljali ročno.
Automation has hardly any impact on the emissions.
Taka avtomatizacija nima praktično nikakršnega vpliva na onesnažujoče izpuste.
The measure would have been taken in any event, for economic reasons.
Ukrep bi bil opravljen v vsakem primeru iz gospodarskih razlogov.
The notified cost of the investment was ITL 1,5 billion (about EUR 750000).
Priglašeni znesek naložbe je bil 1,5 milijarde ITL (kar je približno 750000 EUR).
New pipework carrying gas to the burning chamber
Nove cevi za prenos plina v sežigalne komore
The gas pipe bringing gas to the chambers in which the gas is burnt to heat the ovens was leaking, allowing gas to escape.
Cev, po kateri plin potuje proti sežigalni komori za zagrevanje peči je puščala, zaradi česar je prihajalo do izpustov plina v zrak.
It would have had to be replaced in any event, because the gas is highly explosive and the leaks represented a serious danger to the workers.
Cev bi morali zamenjati v vsakem primeru, saj je plin visoko eksploziven in so izpusti pomenili resno tveganje za delavce.
The investment cost ITL 761 million (about EUR 380000).
Znesek naložbe je bil 761 milijonov ITL (kar je približno 380000 EUR).
Before the investment, the plant’s water and sewerage system complied with the mandatory thresholds in force.
Pred izvedbo naložbe je bil sistem za dovajanje in odvajanje vode v skladu z zavezujočimi standardi.
The amount of water taken from and returned to the sea was 36800000 m3 before the investment, and 26000000 m3 after the investment.
Količina zajete morske vode, ki se je potem stekala nazaj v morje, je pred naložbo obsegala 36800000 m3, zdaj pa obsega 26000000 m3.
The investment consisted essentially in building a connection to the local authority water purification plant, and changing the piping system so as to reduce the volume of water needed.
Naložba je bila v glavnem namenjena gradnji cevi za povezavo s komunalno čistilno napravo in zamenjavi sistema cevi, da bi se zmanjšala količina uporabljene vode.
The Commission considers that the measure had a genuinely environmental aim.
Komisija meni, da ima ta ukrep pristen okoljevarstveni namen.
The investment reduced pumping costs by EUR 206712 annually.
Naložba je omogočila zmanjšanje stroškov črpanja za 206712 EUR letno.
Thus there are no production benefits which might have to be deducted.
Vendar pa ni opaziti splošnih koristi za proizvodnjo, ki bi jih bilo treba odšteti.
In view of the above, the Commission has concluded that, for the coking plant, investments amounting to ITL 29,93 billion have a genuine environmental objective (72 % of the total amount invested in the coking plant), and are thus eligible under the Guidelines in force at the time (recital 15 above) [17].
Na podlagi navedenega je Komisija ugotovila, da imajo naložbe v koksarno v višini 29,93 milijarde ITL (kar je 72 % vseh naložb) pristen okoljevarstveni namen in so zato dopustne v skladu s Smernicami o državnih pomočeh za varstvo okolja iz leta 1994, ki so bile tedaj veljavne (glej uvodno izjavo 15) [17].
There are no production benefits.
Gospodarskih koristi za proizvodnjo ni.
Italy notified an aid intensity of 7 %.
Italija je priglasila pomoč v višini 7 %.
The corresponding sum in aid, ITL 2,095 billion (equal to EUR 1081977,2), can therefore be found compatible.
Navedeni znesek pomoči v višini 2,095 milijarde ITL (kar je 1081977,20 EUR) je torej združljiv.
The Commission has concluded that the remaining investments in the coking plant, amounting to ITL 8,52 billion (EUR 4300000), would have been carried out in any event, either for economic reasons or for reasons to do with the useful life of the plant.
Glede preostalih naložb v koksarno v znesku 8,52 milijarde ITL (kar je približno 4,3 milijona EUR) je Komisija ugotovila, da bi bile izvedene v vsakem primeru iz gospodarskih razlogov ali zaradi življenjske dobe naprav.
As regional aid to investment is not permitted in the steel industry, the aid corresponding to this investment, amounting to ITL 0,596 billion (EUR 307808,31), is incompatible.
Glede na to, da deželne pomoči za naložbe v jeklarski panogi niso dovoljene, pomoč v višini 0,596 milijarde ITL (kar je 307808,31 EUR) ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The entire measure in respect of the water and sewerage system can be considered to have a genuine environmental objective.
Glede sistema za dovajanje in odvajanje vode lahko rečemo, da je ukrep v celoti in pristno namenjen varovanju okolja.
Since there are no production benefits, the full amount of aid can be approved: at an aid intensity of 7 %, this amounts to ITL 1,379 billion (EUR 712184,06),
Ker ni nikakršnih koristi za proizvodnjo, se celoten znesek pomoči v višini 1,379 milijarde ITL (712184,06 EUR) lahko odobri (7 % pomoči) –
The State aid which Italy plans to grant to the steel undertaking Lucchini Siderurgica SpA consisting of EUR 1081977,2 (ITL 2095 billion) for environmental investments in the coking plant and EUR 712184,06 (ITL 1379 billion) for environmental investments in the water and sewerage system is compatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč, ki jo želi Italija nameniti jeklarskemu podjetju Lucchini Siderurgica S.p.A v višini 1081977,20 EUR (2095 milijard ITL) za naložbe v koksarno z namenom varovanja okolja in v višini 712184,06 EUR (1379 milijard ITL) za naložbe v sistem za dovajanje in odvajanje vode z namenom varovanja okolja, je združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The State aid which Italy plans to grant to the steel undertaking Lucchini Siderurgica SpA consisting of EUR 307808,31 (ITL 0,596 billion) for investments in the coking plant other than those referred to in Article 1 is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč, ki jo želi Italija nameniti jeklarskemu podjetju Lucchini Siderurgica S.p.A v višini 307808,31 EUR (0,569 milijarde ITL) za drugačne naložbe v koksarno od tistih iz člena 1, ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
Consequently, this aid may not be granted.
Omenjene pomoči zato ni mogoče izplačati.
OJ L 163, 20.6.2001, p. 24.
UL L 163, 20.6.2001, str. 24.
Case T-166/01 Lucchini v Commission [2006] ECR II-2875.
Zadeva T-166/01, Lucchini proti Komisiji, Zodl. 2006, str. II-2875.
The on-site visit was carried out by two DG Competition officials and one steel expert from DG Enterprise and Industry.
Ogled na kraju proizvodnje sta opravila dva funkcionarja Generalnega direktorata za konkurenco in strokovnjak za jeklarstvo Generalnega direktorata za podjetništvo in industrijo.
Judgment, paragraphs 112 et seq.
Točka 112 in naslednje v obrazložitvi sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje.
Commission Decision No 2496/96/ECSC of 18 December 1996 establishing Community rules for State aid to the steel industry, (OJ L 338, 1996, p. 42).
Odločba Komisije št. 2496/96/ESPJ z dne 18. decembra 1996 o določitvi pravil Skupnosti za državno pomoč jeklarski industriji (UL L 338/1996, str. 42).
Judgment, paragraph 59.
Točka 59 in naslednje v obrazložitvi sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje.
Judgment, paragraph 92.
Točka 92 in naslednje v obrazložitvi sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje.
Ibid.
Prav tam.
Judgment, paragraph 103.
Točka 103 in naslednje v obrazložitvi sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje.
For instance, the Court upheld the Commission decision with respect to the investment in the blast furnace.
Na primer, Sodišče prve stopnje je potrdilo odločbo Komisije o naložbah v plavž.
The Commission had found that the modernisation of the furnace had made the original environmental equipment redundant, so that it would have had to be replaced in any event for production reasons.
Komisija je ugotovila, da so zaradi posodobitve plavža dotedanje naprave za varstvo okolja postale tako neuporabne, da bi jih morali zamenjati v vsakem primeru zaradi same proizvodnje.
Judgment, paragraphs 107 et seq.
Točka 107 in naslednje v obrazložitvi sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje.
Second part of the Annex to the Code, point (a): ‘In the case of firms which decide to improve significantly on mandatory standards, in addition to complying with the criteria in point (b)(ii) above, the investor will have to demonstrate that a clear decision was taken to opt for higher standards which necessitated additional investment, that is, that a lower-cost solution existed which would meet the new environmental standards.
Priloga k Pravilom o pomoči jeklarstvu, drugi del, odstavek (a): V primeru podjetij, ki nameravajo zavezujoče okoljske standarde znatno preseči, mora investitor poleg izpolnitve meril pod črko (b)(ii) dokazati, da se je jasno odločil za višje okoljske standarde, ki terjajo dodatne naložbe, kar pomeni, da bi bila za zadostitev okoljskih zahtev mogoča stroškovno ugodnejša rešitev.
In any event, the higher aid level (30 %, as opposed to the 15 % that could be granted at the time or meeting mandatory standards) will only apply to the additional environmental protection achieved’.
Vsekakor velja višja raven pomoči [30 % v primerjavi s 15 %, kolikor je bilo v tistem času mogoče dodeliti za doseganje zavezujočih standardov] le za dodatno doseženo raven varstva okolja.
Judgment, paragraphs 104 et seq.
Točka 104 in naslednje v obrazložitvi sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje.
Irrespective of whether they improve on best available techniques, which is a requirement under the current Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection (OJ C 82, 1.4.2008, p. 1).
To ne vpliva na vprašanje, ali bodo izboljšali najboljše razpoložljive tehnološke postopke, kot je predvideno v veljavnih Smernicah o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja (glej UL C 82, 1.4.2008, str. 1).
On 9 August 2007, the Commission sent Italy a request for information, which was answered by letter dated 5 September 2007.
Z dopisom z dne 9. avgusta 2007 je Komisija poslala Italiji zahtevo po informacijah, na katero je ta odgovorila z dopisom z dne 5. septembra 2007.
Further information was gathered in an on-site visit to the production plant in Piombino, Tuscany, on 10 September 2007 [4].
Več informacij je bilo zbranih 10. septembra 2007 med ogledom [4] proizvodnega obrata v Piombinu v Toskani.
The battery on which the notified investments were carried out was built in 1971.
Koksarniška baterija, ki je predmet priglašenih naložb, je bila zgrajena leta 1971.
At that time, Lucchini Piombino had three coke oven batteries, one of which had 27 ovens, one 43, and one 45.
V tistem času je imela družba Lucchini Piombino tri koksarniške baterije, sestavljene iz 27, 43 in 45 peči.
The investment began in 1998.
Z naložbami so začeli leta 1998.
The other two coking batteries were shut down for dismantling.
Drugi dve bateriji so zaprli in zanje odredili uničenje.
Further, Italy informed the Commission that the interruption of the working of the coking battery in 1992-1993 sped up its degradation. It thus reduced the useful life of the battery.
Poleg tega je Italija Komisijo obvestila, da je prekinitev del na bateriji v obdobju 1992–1993 pospešila propadanje naprave in skrajšala njeno življenjsko dobo.
The Commission accepts Italy’s explanation regarding the need for hermetic closure between the two chambers. But the Commission does not believe that this shows that the investor had taken a clear decision to opt for higher standards.
Komisija sprejema pojasnila Italije o nujnosti neprepustne zapore med pečjo in sežigalno komoro, vendar meni, da ta pojasnila ne dokazujejo, da se je investitor jasno odločil za izbiro višjih okoljevarstvenih standardov.
On the other hand, water from the local authority purification plant is not free of charge, but costs EUR 0,15 per m3, which results in additional costs of EUR 226200 annually. The new system consequently costs Lucchini EUR 19488 annually more that the old one.
Voda iz čistilne naprave pa se ne dobavlja zastonj, ampak stane 0,15 EUR na m3, tako da dodatni stroški znašajo 226200 EUR. Tako družba Lucchini za novi sistem plačuje 19448 EUR več kot za prejšnjega.
The coking process has a specific duration of around 24 hours. Any speeding up of the process before or during coke production will not speed up production overall or increase the amount of coke produced in a specific time.
Postopek koksanja traja približno 24 ur. Morebitna pospešitev postopka pred ali med proizvodnjo koksa ne povzroči splošne pospešitve proizvodnje ter ne poveča količine proizvedenega koksa na enoto časa.
As regards eligibility, the Code states that ‘new investment which would have been necessary in any event on economic grounds or due to the age of the existing plant or equipment will not be eligible for aid. The existing plant must have significant useful life left (at least 25 %) for the new investment to be eligible for aid’ [10].
Kar zadeva dopustnost, je v pravilih o pomoči jeklarski panogi opredeljeno, da se naložbe izvedejo „v vsakem primeru“ ali „zaradi gospodarskih razlogov ali upoštevajoč starost naprave ali obstoječe opreme […] Za pridobitev pomoči za nove naložbe mora imeti naprava ali oprema dovolj dolgo preostalo življenjsko dobo (najmanj 25 %)“ [10].
of 18 May 2009
z dne 18. maja 2009
establishing the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Community, within the International Grains Council as regards the extension of the Grains Trade Convention 1995
o stališču, ki naj bo v imenu Skupnosti sprejeto v Mednarodnem svetu za žita v zvezi s podaljšanjem Konvencije o trgovanju z žiti iz leta 1995
The Grains Trade Convention 1995 was concluded by the Community by Council Decision 96/88/EC [1] and was regularly extended for further periods of two-year.
Konvencijo o trgovanju z žiti iz leta 1995 je sklenila Skupnost s Sklepom Sveta 96/88/ES [1] in je bila redno podaljšana za nadaljnja obdobja dveh let.
The Commission, which represents the Community in the Grains Trade Convention, should therefore be authorised to vote in favour of such extension,
Komisija, ki zastopa Skupnost v Konvenciji o trgovanju z žiti, bi zato morala biti pooblaščena, da glasuje za tako podaljšanje –
The European Community's position within the International Grains Council shall be to vote in favour of the extension of the Grains Trade Convention 1995 for a further period of up to two years.
Stališče Skupnosti v Mednarodnem svetu za žita je glasovati za podaljšanje Konvencije o trgovanju z žiti iz leta 1995 za nadaljnje obdobje do dveh let.
The Commission is hereby authorised to express this position within the International Grains Council.
Ta sklep pooblašča Komisijo, da izrazi to stališče v Mednarodnem svetu za žita.
Done at Brussels, 18 May 2009.
V Bruslju, 18. maja 2009
It was last extended by decision of the International Grains Council in June 2007 and remains into force until 30 June 2009.
Nazadnje je bila podaljšana s sklepom Mednarodnega sveta za žita junija 2007 in ostaja v veljavi do 30. junija 2009.
establishing the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Community, within the International Sugar Council as regards the extension of the International Sugar Agreement 1992
o stališču, ki naj bo v imenu Skupnosti sprejeto v Mednarodnem svetu za sladkor glede podaljšanja Mednarodnega sporazuma o sladkorju iz leta 1992
The Commission, which represents the Community in the International Sugar Council, should therefore be authorised to vote in favour of such extension,
Komisija, ki zastopa Skupnost v Mednarodnem svetu za sladkor, bi zato morala biti pooblaščena, da glasuje za tako podaljšanje –
The Community's position within the International Sugar Council shall be to vote in favour of the extension of the International Sugar Agreement 1992 for a further period up to two years.
Stališče Skupnosti v Mednarodnem svetu za sladkor je glasovati za podaljšanje Mednarodnega sporazuma o sladkorju iz leta 1992 za nadaljnje obdobje do dveh let.
The Commission is hereby authorised to express this position within the International Sugar Council.
Ta sklep pooblašča Komisijo, da izrazi to stališče v Mednarodnem svetu za sladkor.
The International Sugar Agreement 1992 was concluded by the Community by Council Decision 92/580/EEC [1] and entered into force on 1 January 1993 for a period of three years until 31 December 1995.
Mednarodni sporazum o sladkorju iz leta 1992 je Skupnost sklenila s Sklepom 92/580/EGS [1] in je stopil v veljavo 1. januarja 1993 za tri leta do 31. decembra 1995.