natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This application does not replace notification to the Commission under Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
Ta zahtevek ne nadomešča obvestila Komisiji v skladu s členom 88(3) Pogodbe.
A positive decision by the Commission on the major project under Regulation (EC) 1083/2006 does not constitute state aid approval.
Pozitivna odločitev Komisije v zvezi z velikim projektom v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1083/2006 ne pomeni odobritve državne pomoči.
The starting date for eligibility of expenditure is the date of receipt of the related draft Operational Programme by the Commission or 1 January 2007, whichever is the earlier.
Opomba: Začetni datum za upravičenost izdatkov je datum, ko Komisija prejme zadevni osnutek operativnega programa, ali 1. januar 2007, kar nastopi prej.
Decision amount, i.e., the ‘amount to which the co-financing rate for the priority axis applies’ (Article 41(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006) (respecting the maximum public contribution according to state aid rules and the exclusion of ineligible expenditure)
Določeni znesek, tj. „znesek, za katerega velja stopnja sofinanciranja za prednostno os“ (člen 41(2)) Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006) (ob upoštevanju največjega javnega prispevka v skladu s pravili o državni pomoči in izključitve neupravičenih izdatkov)
Community contribution (in euro) = (1)*(2)
Prispevek Skupnosti (v EUR) = (1) * (2)
In the light of the results of the grant calculation (H.2.1 consistent with the rules on state aid) the total investment costs of the project shall be met from the following sources:
Glede na rezultate izračuna donacije (H.2.1 skladno s pravili o državni pomoči) se skupni naložbeni stroški projekta plačajo iz naslednjih virov:
Of which (For Information)
Od tega (informativno)
Total investment cost [H.1.10.(A)]
Skupni naložbeni stroški [H.1.10.(A)]
Community assistance [H.2.1.3]
Pomoč Skupnosti [H.2.1.3]
The Community contribution (H.2.1.3) shall be presented in terms of the share of annual programme commitment.
Prispevek Skupnosti (H.2.1.3.) se prikaže kot delež letne programske obveznosti.
Give details of the proposed measures to publicise Community financial assistance (i.e. type of measure, brief description, estimated costs, duration, etc.):
Navedite podatke o predlaganih ukrepih za obveščanje javnosti o finančni pomoči Skupnosti (tj. vrsta ukrepov, kratek opis, predvideni stroški, trajanje itd.):
Has the benefiting undertaking previously been, or is it currently, the subject of a procedure (16)
Ali je bilo ali je zdaj podjetje, ki prejema pomoč, predmet postopka (16) za vračilo pomoči Skupnosti po prenosu proizvodne dejavnosti v državi članici ali v drugo državo članico?
Under Article 57(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006.) to recover Community assistance following the transfer of a productive activity within a Member State or toward another Member State?
V skladu s členom 57(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006.
ANNEX XXI MAJOR PROJECT
PRILOGA XXI
Code Percentage
Koda Odstotek
Categorisation of project activity (2)
Kategorizacija dejavnosti projekta (2)
(in euro, discounted)
(v EUR, diskontirana)
Commission Decision: … of …
Odločba Komisije z dne …
Average duration of these jobs (months) (1) (B)
Povprečno trajanje teh delovnih mest (meseci) (1)
Average duration of these jobs (months) (1) (B) No of jobs directly created:
Povprečno trajanje teh delovnih mest (meseci) (1)
No of jobs indirectly created 3. During implementation phase 4. During operational phase
Št. neposredno ustvarjenih delovnih mest
Date of provisional closure of accounts: … Date of sending to the Commission: …
Datum začasnega zaključka poslovnih knjig: … Datum pošiljanja Komisiji: …
Building and construction 4. Plant and machinery 5. Contingencies (2) 6. Price adjustment (if applicable) (3)
Prilagoditev cene (če je ustrezno) (3)
Council Regulation (EC) No 847/2009
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 847/2009
amending Regulation (EC) No 682/2007 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain prepared or preserved sweetcorn in kernels originating in Thailand
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 682/2007 o dokončni protidampinški dajatvi, uvedeni na uvoz nekaterih vrst pripravljene ali konzervirane sladke koruze v zrnju s poreklom iz Tajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation) and in particular Articles 8 and 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), ter zlasti člena 8 in člena 11(3) Uredbe,
Following an investigation (the original investigation), the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 682/2007 [2] (the original Regulation), imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain prepared or preserved sweetcorn in kernels falling within CN codes ex20019030 and ex20058000 and originating in Thailand.
Po preiskavi (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prvotna preiskava) je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 682/2007 [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prvotna uredba), uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih vrst pripravljene ali konzervirane sladke koruze v zrnju, uvrščene v oznake KN ex20019030 in ex20058000 ter s poreklom iz Tajske.
The measures took the form of an ad valorem duty.
Ukrepi so bili sprejeti kot dajatev ad valorem.
Regulation (EC) No 954/2008 [3] amended Regulation (EC) No 682/2007 with regard to the rate of duty imposed on one company and on ‘all other companies’.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 954/2008 [3] je spremenila Uredbo (ES) št. 682/2007 glede stopnje dajatve, uvedene za eno družbo in „vse druge družbe“.
The duty rates range between 3,1 % and 14,3 %.
Stopnje dajatve se tako gibljejo med 3,1 % in 14,3 %.
Imports from two Thai exporting producers, namely Malee Sampran Public Co. Ltd (Malee) and Sun Sweet Co. Ltd (Sun Sweet), from whom undertakings had been accepted by Commission Decision 2007/424/EC [4] and which fulfilled the conditions set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 682/2007, were exempted from the duty.
Uvoz od dveh tajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, Malee Sampran Public Co. Ltd (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Malee) in Sun Sweet Co. Ltd (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sun Sweet), katerih zavezi sta bili sprejeti s Sklepom Komisije 2007/424/ES [4], izpolnjuje pogoje iz člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 682/2007 in je oproščen dajatev.
Grounds for a review
Razlogi za pregled
At the time of imposition of definitive measures, the Council exceptionally allowed cooperating exporting producers who were not able to submit a sufficiently substantiated undertaking offer within the deadline set in Article 8(2) of the basic Regulation to complete their offer within 10 calendar days from the entry into force of the original Regulation.
Ob uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov je Svet izjemoma dovolil sodelujočim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki niso mogli predložiti dovolj utemeljene ponudbe za zavezo v roku iz člena 8(2) osnovne uredbe, da dopolnijo ponudbo v desetih koledarskih dneh od začetka veljavnosti osnovne uredbe.
Ten further undertaking offers were completed within this deadline.
V navedenem roku so dopolnili še deset ponudb za zavezo.
The two undertaking offers accepted, as well as those 10 further offers, include fixed minimum import prices.
Sprejeti ponudbi za zavezo in deset dodatnih ponudb vključuje fiksne minimalne uvozne cene.
Upon disclosure of the 10 further offers, the Community industry opposed the acceptance of price undertakings by stating that fixed minimum import prices were no longer an effective form of the measure because of the increasing price of the product concerned, as defined in recital 16, as well as of its main raw material and inputs.
Ob razkritju desetih dodatnih ponudb je industrija Skupnosti nasprotovala sprejetju cenovnih zavez, ker da fiksne minimalne uvozne cene niso več učinkovita oblika ukrepa zaradi višanja cen za zadevni proizvod, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 16 ter glavno surovino in vložke zanj.
In order to reassess the appropriateness of undertakings as an effective form of anti-dumping measures, the Commission deemed it necessary to reassess the acceptability and workability of the undertakings offered and of those accepted.
Za ponovno oceno ustreznosti zavez kot učinkovite oblike protidampinškega ukrepa je Komisija menila, da je treba ponovno oceniti sprejemljivost in izvedljivosti ponujenih in sprejetih zavez.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of a partial interim review, the Commission announced on 16 September 2008, by a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [5], the initiation of a partial interim review in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom je Komisija ugotovila, da je dovolj dokazov, ki upravičujejo začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda, zato je 16. septembra 2008 z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [5], napovedala začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
The review was limited in scope to the examination of the form of the measure applicable to the two Thai exporting producers from whom undertakings had been accepted and the 10 Thai exporting producers with pending undertaking offers.
Pregled je bil omejen na preučitev oblike ukrepa za tajska proizvajalca izvoznika, katerih zavezi sta bili sprejeti, in deset tajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, katerih ponudbe za zavezo so še nerešene.
The Commission officially advised the exporting producers, the representatives of the exporting country, the Community producers and their association as well as importers of the initiation of the partial interim review.
Komisija je proizvajalce izvoznike, predstavnike države izvoznice, proizvajalce Skupnosti in njihovo združenje ter uvoznike uradno obvestila o začetku delnega vmesnega pregleda.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane stranke so imele možnost pisno izraziti svoja stališča in zahtevati zaslišanje v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
In order to obtain the information deemed necessary for the investigation, the Commission sent questionnaires to the 12 exporting producers concerned as well as to the Community producers.
Da bi pridobila podatke, ki se zdijo potrebni za preiskavo, je Komisija poslala vprašalnike 12 zadevnim proizvajalcem izvoznikom in proizvajalcem Skupnosti.
The Community producers and seven out of the 12 Thai companies replied to the questionnaire.
Proizvajalci Skupnosti in sedem od 12 tajskih družb je izpolnilo vprašalnik.
Five Thai companies with pending undertaking offers did not reply at all to this review questionnaire and were considered as not cooperating within the meaning of Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Pet tajskih družb z nerešenimi ponudbami za zavezo sploh ni izpolnilo vprašalnika za pregled in se štejejo za nesodelujoče družbe po členu 18 osnovne uredbe.
The information submitted by one Thai company had to be disregarded due to incompleteness of the confidential questionnaire reply.
Podatki, ki jih je predložila ena tajska družba, niso bili upoštevani zaradi nepopolno izpolnjenega zaupnega vprašalnika.
In addition, this company did not provide a meaningful non-confidential version of the questionnaire reply.
Poleg tega navedena družba ni predložila smiselne nezaupne različice izpolnjenega vprašalnika.
The company argued that due to significant structural changes within the company, including a name change, it was difficult to react efficiently to the questionnaire.
Družba je trdila, da se je bilo težko učinkovito odzvati na vprašalnik zaradi bistvenih strukturnih sprememb v družbi, ki vključujejo spremembo imena.
Another Thai company also refused to provide a meaningful non-confidential version of the questionnaire reply.
Druga tajska družba ni hotela predložiti smiselne nezaupne različice izpolnjenega vprašalnika.
The companies concerned were informed about the proposed application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation and were given the opportunity to comment.
Zadevni družbi sta bili obveščeni o predlagani uporabi člena 18 osnovne uredbe in sta imeli možnost za pripombe.
The latter company claimed that it was impossible for it to furnish a meaningful non-confidential reply of its data submitted due to the sensitivity of the information contained.
Nazadnje navedena družba je trdila, da je zanjo nemogoče priskrbeti smiselno nezaupno različico predloženega vprašalnika zaradi občutljivosti vsebovanih podatkov.
It is noted that whereas this argument is acceptable for parts of the questionnaire dealing with the companies costs and prices, this argument cannot be accepted for other parts of the questionnaire such as operating statistics, general information, etc. The first company submitted further confidential information.
Gre omeniti, da čeprav je ta razlog sprejemljiv za dele vprašalnika, ki obravnavajo stroške in cene družb, ga ni mogoče sprejeti za druge dele vprašalnika, kot je statistika o obratovanju, splošne informacije itn. Prva družba je predložila dodatne zaupne podatke.
However, even considering that this first company may be in a phase of restructuring, basic information has to be given in order to allow for an assessment of the situation of the company.
Četudi bi upoštevali, da bi ta prva družba lahko bila v obdobju prestrukturiranja, je treba predložiti osnovne informacije, da se lahko oceni stanje družbe.
Despite the additional information submitted at a later stage, this minimum requirement was not met, given that no details about certain cost items were given.
Kljub dodatnim podatkom, ki so bili predloženi pozneje, ta minimalna zahteva ni bila izpolnjena, ker ni bilo podrobnosti o nekaterih stroškovnih postavkah.
Moreover, no meaningful non-confidential version of the reply was provided.
Poleg tega ni bila predložena smiselna nezaupna različica izpolnjenega vprašalnika.
It was thus considered that no decisive arguments were submitted to reverse the decision to apply Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Zato se je štelo, da niso bili predloženi odločilni razlogi za spremembo odločitve o uporabi člena 18 osnovne uredbe.
All other producing companies cooperated by replying to the questionnaire.
Vse druge družbe proizvajalke so sodelovale z izpolnjenim vprašalnikom.
Several other interested parties submitted comments.
Več drugih zainteresiranih strank je predložilo pripombe.
One importer stated that the imposition of measures was not justified due to the absence of dumping during the original investigation period (original IP), as defined in recital 17, and should therefore be withdrawn.
En uvoznik je navedel, da uvedba ukrepov ni bila upravičena, ker med prvotnim obdobjem preiskave (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prvotno OP), kot je opredeljeno v uvodni izjavi 17, ni bilo dampinga, zaradi česar jih je treba preklicati.
In this regard, it should be recalled that the original investigation established that injurious dumping was taking place.
Glede tega gre omeniti, da je prvotna preiskava ugotovila obstoj škodljivega dampinga.
Moreover, this review focuses on the appropriateness of undertakings as an effective form of anti-dumping measures, and any claims regarding the findings of the original investigation other than the form of the measures cannot be taken into account.
Poleg tega se ta pregled osredotoča na ustreznost zavez kot oblike protidampinških ukrepov in ni mogoče upoštevati nobene trditve o ugotovitvah prvotne preiskave razen oblike ukrepov.
The comment therefore had to be rejected.
Pripomba se zato zavrne.
Another importer submitted a formal request for suspension of the measures.
Drugi uvoznik je vložil uradno zahtevo za opustitev ukrepov.
This request is being assessed outside the current review investigation.
Zahteva se obravnava zunaj sedanje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
Exporting producers in Thailand
proizvajalci izvozniki na Tajskem:
Lampang Food Products Co., Ltd, Bangkok,
Lampang Food Products Co. Ltd, Bangkok,
Malee Sampran Public Co., Ltd, Bangkok,
Malee Sampran Public Co. Ltd, Bangkok,
River Kwai International Food Industry Co., Ltd, Bangkok, and,
River Kwai International Food Industry Co. Ltd, Bangkok, in
Sun Sweet Co., Ltd, Chingmai;
Sun Sweet Co. Ltd, Chingmai;
Community Producers
proizvajalci Skupnosti:
Bonduelle Conserve International, Lille-Villeneuve d’Ascq, France, and,
Bonduelle Conserve International, Lille-Villeneuve d’Ascq, Francija, in
Conserve Italia SCA, San Lazzaro di Savena, Italy.
Conserve Italia SCA, San Lazzaro di Savena, Italija.
The investigation covered the period from 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2008 (‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava je zajela obdobje od 1. julija 2007 do 30. junija 2008 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom ali OPP).
The product concerned is sweetcorn (Zea mays var. saccharata) in kernels, prepared or preserved by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen, currently falling within CN code ex20019030, and sweetcorn (Zea mays var. saccharata) in kernels, prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen, other than products of heading 2006, currently falling within CN code ex20058000, originating in Thailand.
Zadevni proizvod je sladka koruza (Zea mays var. saccharata) v zrnju, pripravljena ali konzervirana v kisu ali ocetni kislini, nezamrznjena, trenutno uvrščena v oznako KN ex20019030, in sladka koruza (Zea mays var. saccharata) v zrnju, pripravljena ali konzervirana drugače kot v kisu ali ocetni kislini, nezamrznjena, razen proizvodov iz tarifne številke 2006, trenutno uvrščena v oznako KN ex20058000, s poreklom iz Tajske.
Evolution of sale prices of the product concerned
Razvoj prodajnih cen zadevnega proizvoda
As a first step, the price developments of the product concerned were examined for the period beginning with the original IP, i.e. from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2005 and ending with the RIP.
Najprej se je preučil razvoj cen zadevnega proizvoda za obdobje, ki se začne s prvotnim OP, tj. od 1. januarja 2005 do 31. decembra 2005, in konča z OPP.
Data for the remainder of 2008 was looked at to cross-check conclusions.
Podatki za ostanek leta 2008 so bili upoštevani za navzkrižno preverjanje ugotovitev.
Import prices for imports from Thailand into the EU by quarter
Uvozne cene pri uvozu iz Tajske v EU po četrtletju
Original IP
Prvotno OP
The overall evolution of the average import price of the product concerned reported by Eurostat, as set out in Table 1, was corroborated by the analysis of the verified sale prices to the EU of a representative can size (12 oz) by the Thai companies.
Skupni razvoj povprečnih uvoznih cen zadevnega proizvoda, ki jih navaja Eurostat, kakor so zapisane v razpredelnici 1, potrjuje analiza preverjenih prodajnih cen v EU za reprezentativno velikost pločevinke (12 oz) tajskih družb.
Indeed, as shown in Table 2, the same trend as that reported by Eurostat could be observed for this can size.
Kot kaže razpredelnica 2, se za to velikost pločevinke namreč lahko opaža isto gibanje kot pri tistem, o katerem poroča Eurostat.
Data available for the second half of 2008 confirm this evolution.
Razpoložljivi podatki za drugo polovico leta 2008 potrjujejo ta razvoj.
Thai sale prices to the EU (euro/t — can size 12 oz — indexed)
Tajske prodajne cene v EU (EUR/t – pločevinka 12 oz – indeksirane)
Source: Investigation.
Vir: Preiskava.
In view of the significant price variation of the product concerned since the original IP, it has to be concluded that price undertakings with fixed minimum import prices are no longer suitable.
Iz občutnih sprememb cene zadevnega proizvoda od prvotnega OP je treba povzeti, da cenovne zaveze s fiksnimi minimalnimi uvoznimi cenami niso več primerne.
Possible indexation of the minimum import prices
Morebitno indeksiranje minimalnih uvoznih cen
Although the pending undertaking offers and the accepted undertaking offers exclusively contain fixed minimum prices, it was also examined whether the two undertakings in force and the 10 pending undertaking offers could exceptionally be maintained, or respectively accepted, through an indexation of the minimum import prices.
Čeprav nerešene ponudbe za zavezo in sprejeti ponudbi za zavezo vsebujejo zgolj fiksne minimalne cene, se je preučilo, ali bi se izjemoma lahko ohranili veljavni zavezi oziroma sprejelo deset nerešenih ponudb za zavezo z indeksiranjem minimalnih uvoznih cen.
It therefore had to be established whether there is a correlation between the price evolution of the sale prices of the product concerned and the purchase prices of the main raw material/inputs used in the production process and, should that be the case, whether they represent a significant part of the total cost of production and whether there is publicly available price information for those components.
Zato je bilo treba ugotoviti, ali obstaja povezava med razvojem prodajnih cen za zadevni proizvod in nakupnimi cenami za glavno surovino/vložke v proizvodnem postopku, in če obstaja, ali te pomenijo znaten del skupnih proizvodnih stroškov in ali so podatki o cenah zanje javno dostopni.
The two main components are sweetcorn and cans, representing each between 30 and 40 % of the cost of production of the product concerned.
Glavna vložka sta sladka koruza in pločevinke, ki ustvarjajo 30 do 40 % proizvodnih stroškov zadevnega proizvoda.
Indexation on the evolution of purchase prices of sweetcorn
Indeksiranje na razvoj nakupnih cen sladke koruze
Data available for the end of 2008 point to an even higher volatility.
Razpoložljivi podatki za konec leta 2008 kažejo še večjo spremenljivost.
Purchase prices of sweetcorn by quarter in euro (indexed)
Nakupne cene sladke koruze po četrtletju v EUR (indeksirane)
Original IP (2005)
Prvotno OP (2005)
Even though it was found that both the sale price of the product concerned and the purchase price of sweetcorn showed an increasing volatility since the original IP, no consistent and stable correlation between both prices could be established.
Čeprav je bilo ugotovljeno, da se tako za prodajne cene zadevnega proizvoda kot nakupne cene sladke koruze kaže čedalje večja spremenljivost vse od prvotnega OP, ni mogoče ugotoviti dosledne in stalne povezave med cenama.
Although between the beginning of 2005 and the end of 2006, it could be argued that the price evolution of sweetcorn is somewhat reflected in the price evolution of the product concerned, this is no longer the case since 2007.
Čeprav je bilo med začetkom leta 2005 in koncem leta 2006 mogoče trditi, da se razvoj cen sladke koruze nekako kaže v razvoju cen za zadevni proizvod, to od leta 2007 ne drži več.
Indeed, as illustrated in Table 4, the purchase price of sweetcorn decreased while the sale price of the product concerned increased and vice versa.
Kot je prikazano v razpredelnici 4, so se nakupne cene sladke koruze namreč znižale, medtem ko so se prodajne cene zadevnega proizvoda povišale in obratno.
Correlation between the sale price of the product concerned and the purchase price of sweetcorn
Povezava med prodajnimi cenami za zadevni proizvod in nakupnimi cenami sladke koruze
Moreover, the analysis showed that there is no homogeneity in the evolution of sweetcorn prices worldwide.
Poleg tega je analiza pokazala, da ni enotnosti v razvoju cen sladke koruze po svetu.
As can be seen in Table 3 above, prices in Thailand and in the Community evolve differently.
Kot je razvidno iz zgornje razpredelnice 3, so se cene na Tajskem in v Skupnosti razvijale drugače.
Due to the absence of a correlation between the sale prices of the product concerned and the purchase price of sweetcorn, and in light of the divergent evolution of sweetcorn prices in Thailand and in the Community, it is evident that an indexation of the minimum import price on the price of sweetcorn is not feasible.
Ker ni povezave med prodajnimi cenami za zadevni proizvod in nakupnimi cenami sladke koruze ter je razvoj cen sladke koruze različen na Tajskem in v Skupnosti, je jasno, da indeksacija minimalne uvozne cene sladke koruze ni izvedljiva.