natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In particular, ETVA can not, on the one hand, not implement the part of the September 1995 contract concerning the payment of the purchase price (i.e. not seeking to receive the corresponding annual payments) and, on the other hand, claim that on the basis of the same contract it was obliged to participate to the capital increases.
Zlasti banka ETVA ne more na eni strani sprejeti odločitve, da ne bo izvajala dela pogodbe iz septembra 1995, ki se nanaša na plačilo nakupne cene (tj. da ne bo zahtevala plačila ustreznega letnega obroka), na drugi strani pa trditi, da je morala biti na podlagi iste pogodbe udeležena v dokapitalizacijah.
In other words, since ETVA and Greece had decided not to implement correctly major provisions of the contract, they can not at the same time selectively invoke other provisions of this contract to pretend that ETVA was contractually obliged to do certain things (i.e. participate in the capital increases).
Z drugimi besedami, ker sta se banka ETVA in Grčija odločili, da ne bosta pravilno izvršili glavnih določb pogodbe, se ne moreta obenem selektivno sklicevati na druge določbe te pogodbe, da bi ustvarjali vtis, da je bila banka ETVA pogodbeno zavezana k določenim ravnanjem (tj. k udeležbi v dokapitalizacijah).
HSY’s employees participated in the capital increase.
Zaposleni v podjetju HSY so bili udeleženi v dokapitalizaciji.
However, they did not find themselves in the same situation as ETVA.
Vendar niso bili v enakem položaju kot banka ETVA.
Indeed, they had already breached the September 1995 contract as they were not paying the purchase price to ETVA.
Pogodbo iz septembra 1995 so dejansko že prekršili, saj banki ETVA niso odplačevali nakupne cene.
Moreover, they were in a different situation than ETVA and than a market economy investor.
Razen tega je bil njihov položaj drugačen tako od položaja banke ETVA kot od položaja vlagatelja iz tržnega gospodarstva.
Indeed, they were concerned by the preservation of their jobs, what incites them to invest in HSY, even if the expected financial return is insufficient to convince a market economy investor to invest.
Dejansko jih je skrbelo za ohranitev delovnih mest, kar jih je spodbudilo, da vlagajo v podjetje HSY tudi, če bi bil pričakovan finančni donos premajhen, da bi prepričal vlagatelja iz tržnega gospodarstva.
Greece provided a copy of this law as Annex 10 of its letter of 5 October 2006.
Grčija je izvod tega zakona predložila v Prilogi 10 k dopisu z dne 5. oktobra 2006.
It is not totally clear from Greece’s and HSY’s submissions (including the first Deloitte report) whether the premium amounted to 0,4 % annually, but paid on a quarterly basis, or amounted to 0,4 % per quarter.
Iz dopisov, ki sta jih predložila Grčija in podjetje HSY (vključno s prvim poročilom revizijske hiše Deloitte), ni povsem jasno, ali je premija znašala 0,4 % letno in je bila plačana po trimesečjih, ali pa je znašala 0,4 % na trimesečje.
While this is important in the framework of the recovery procedure, this does not change the conclusion in the present decision.
To je sicer pomembno v okviru postopka povrnitve, vendar pa se s tem ne spremeni ugotovitev iz te odločbe.
This list was provided on pages 3–11 and 3–12 of the report, in the framework of the analysis of the GRD 10 billion loan that benefited from a State guaranteed granted on the basis of Law 2322/1995 (measure E14 of the present decision).
Seznam je bil naveden na straneh 3–11 in 3–12 poročila v okviru analize posojila v višini 10 milijard GRD, ki mu je bilo zagotovljeno državno poroštvo, odobreno na podlagi Zakona 2322/1995 (ukrep E14 te odločbe).
The Commission has authorised aid free guarantee schemes for shipbuilding in Germany (OJ C 62, 11.3.2004, p. 3), the Netherlands (OJ C 228, 17.9.2005, p. 10), France (OJ C 259, 27.10.2006, p. 14) and Finland (OJ C 152, 6.7.2007, p. 6).
Komisija je odobrila poroštvene sheme brez elementa pomoči za ladjedelništvo v Nemčiji (UL C 62, 11.3.2004, str. 3), na Nizozemskem (UL C 228, 17.9.2005, str. 10), v Franciji (UL C 259, 27.10.2006, str. 14) in na Finskem (UL C 152, 6.7.2007, str. 6).
The two latter schemes explicitly include guarantees on advance payments.
Zadnji dve shemi izrecno vključujeta poroštva za predplačila.
Since the State owned 100 % of ETVA when the latter granted the down payments guarantees, the guarantee premium paid by HSY to ETVA was already a remuneration for the State.
Ker je imela država v lasti 100-odstotni delež banke ETVA, ko je ta odobrila poroštva za predujme, je poroštvena premija, ki jo je podjetje HSY plačalo banki ETVA že pomenila nadomestilo državi.
The amendments were as follows:Programme Agreement 33a – SD 33a (Supply of 20 HA/A): the penalties were calculated up to 31.12.2002 and recorded in the amendments as established amounts.
Spremembe so bile:Sporazum o programu 33a – SD 33a (Dobava 20 HA/A): kazni so bile izračunane do 31. decembra 2002 in v spremembah navedene kot opredeljeni zneski.
It was agreed that those amounts should be paid in 10 instalments, with the first instalment being payable when the first vehicle was delivered and the other nine instalments being payable when each of the last nine electric trains was delivered.
Dogovorjeno je bilo, da se morajo ti zneski plačati v 10 obrokih, pri čemer bi prvi obrok zapadel ob dobavi prvega vozila, ostalih devet pa bi zapadlo ob dobavi vsakega izmed ostalih devet električnih vlakov.
It was agreed that the evolution of the penalties would stop from 1.10.2003, provided that the consortia (Siemens AG, Siemens SA and HSY) supplied OSE with equivalent rolling stock.
Dogovorjeno je bilo, da bi se rast kazni ustavila 1. oktobra 2003 pod pogojem, da bo konzorcij (Siemens AG, Siemens SA in HSY) podjetju OSE dobavil enakovreden železniški vozni park.
The consortia met that condition only partially, and thus OSE calculated and claimed the penalty amounts for the entire period.Programme Agreement 39 – SD 39 (Supply of 24 electric locomotives): the penalties were calculated up to 31.12.2002 and recorded in the amendments as established amounts.
Konzorciji so ta pogoj izpolnili le delno in tako je podjetje OSE izračunalo in zahtevalo kazni za celotno obdobje.Sporazum o programu 39 – SD 39 (Dobava 24 električnih lokomotiv): kazni so bile izračunane do 31. decembra 2002 in v spremembah navedene kot opredeljeni zneski.
It was agreed that those amounts should be paid in 10 instalments, the first instalment being payable when the first vehicle was delivered and the other nine instalments being payable when of each of the last nine deliveries was made.
Dogovorjeno je bilo, da se morajo ti zneski plačati v 10 obrokih, pri čemer bi prvi obrok zapadel ob dobavi prvega vozila, ostalih devet pa bi zapadlo ob vsaki izmed zadnjih devet dobav.
A penalty-free period was granted as an extension of the delivery time.
Podaljšanje roka dobave je bilo odobreno kot obdobje, v katerem se kazni ne bodo zaračunavale.
No provision was made with regard to equivalent rolling stock in the case of PA 39 SD 39, but the delivery timetable was amended.
V sporazumu PA 39 SD 39 ni bilo nobenih določb v zvezi z enakovrednim železniškim voznim parkom, bili pa so spremenjeni roki za dobavo.
OSE claimed the penalty clause amounts that had been established by 31.12.2002 and collected them from the consortia (Siemens AG, Siemens SA and HSY).Programme Agreement 35 – SD 35 (Supply of 29 rail buses): a penalty-free period was not granted, and therefore OSE claimed and collected the penalty clause amounts.
Podjetje OSE je zahtevalo zneske iz kazenskih klavzul, ki so bili opredeljeni do 31. decembra 2002 in jih je konzorcijem (Siemens AG, Siemens SA in HSY) tudi zaračunalo.Sporazum o programu 35 – SD 35 (Dobava 29 vagonov): obdobje, v katerem se ne bi zaračunavale kazni, ni bilo odobreno, zato je podjetje OSE zahtevalo in zaračunalo zneske iz kazenskih klavzul.
Default interest on the penalty amounts was charged and claimed for the period for which the amounts were not paid.
Zamudne obresti na kazenske zneske so bile zaračunane in zahtevane za obdobje, ko zneski niso bili plačani.
Up to the time of Greece’s letter of 5 October 2006, the sum of EUR 9932511,99 has been withheld and the sum of EUR 826556 remained to be withheld.
Do dopisa Grčije z dne 5. oktobra 2006 je bil izterjan znesek v višini 9932511,99 EUR, znesek v višini 826556 EUR pa naj bi bil izterjan pozneje.
The consortium for the programme agreement consisted of HSY, Siemens AG and ABB Daimler-Benz Transportation (Bombardier Transportation from 1.5.2001).
Konzorcij v sporazumu o programu so sestavljala podjetja HSY, Siemens AG in ABB Daimler-Benz Transportation (Bombardier Transportation od 1. maja 2001).
The implementation percentages for the agreement were 22,06 % of the total final price paid for HSY and 77,94 % for the other companies.
Odstotki izvajanja sporazuma so bili 22,06 % skupne končne plačane cene za podjetje HSY in 77,94 % za druga podjetja.
That agreement also provided for the configuration and installation of an automatic train protection and identification system in 50 multiple units.
V tem sporazumu sta bila predvidena tudi konfiguracija in namestitev avtomatske zaščite vlakov in identifikacijskega sistema v 50 večdelnih enotah.
Consequently, there was no ground to impose penalties and interest on account of this delay.
Zato ni bilo razloga, na podlagi katerega bi se lahko naložile kazni in obresti zaradi tega odloga.
It is not totally clear from the submission of Greece and HSY (including the first Deloitte report) whether the loan was initially denominated in drachma or in euro.
Iz dopisov Grčije in podjetja HSY (vključno s prvim poročilom revizijske hiše Deloitte) ni povsem jasno, ali je bilo posojilo v začetku izraženo v drahmah ali evrih.
Greece’s answer to the opening decision only gives amounts in Euro and indicates an interest rate based on 3 months Euribor.
V odgovoru Grčije na odločitev o sprožitvi postopka so navedeni samo zneski v evrih in trimesečna obrestna mera EURIBOR.
Conversely, the first Deloitte report indicates that the loan amounted to GRD 16,92 billion and the interest rate was based on Libor.
Nasprotno je v prvem poročilu Deloitte navedeno, da je posojilo znašalo 16,92 milijard GRD, obrestna mera pa je bila LIBOR.
This issue can be clarified in the framework of the recovery procedure.
To vprašanje se lahko pojasni v okviru postopka povrnitve.
In their letter of 21 June 2007, TKMS and GNSH submitted the second Deloitte report.
Podjetji TKMS in GNSH sta v svojem dopisu z dne 21. junija 2007 predložili drugo poročilo revizijske hiše Deloitte.
In the letters dated 21 October 2004 and 17 December 2004 in the case CP 71/02, the Greek authorities confirmed that HSY applied to receive operating aid of 9 % for the two ships, which was accepted by the competent Ministry.
Z dopisoma z dne 21. oktobra 2004 in 17. decembra 2004 v zadevi CP 71/02 so grški organi potrdili, da je podjetje HSY prosilo za pomoč za tekoče poslovanje v višini 9 % za obe ladji, čemur je pristojno ministrstvo ugodilo.
The Greek authorities however confirmed that finally no aid was paid out since HSY did not complete the construction of the ships.
Vendar so grški organi potrdili, da na koncu ni bila podjetju HSY izplačana nobena pomoč, saj podjetje HSY ni dokončalo gradnje ladij.
The granting decisions were finally revoked.
Odločbe o odobritvi so bile na koncu razveljavljene.
Measure 13(c) of the extension decision deals with this topic.
Na to temo se nanaša ukrep 13(c) odločbe o podaljšanju postopka.
See footnote 127.
Glej opombo 127.
The following press article suggests that the ship repair activity was not significantly disturbed: ‘Contracts — Hellenic declares business as usual after Athens earthquake’, Lloyd’s List International, 14 September 1999.
V naslednjem časopisnem članku je navedeno, da dejavnosti v zvezi s popravilom ladij niso bile v večji meri prekinjene: „Pogodbe – Podjetje Hellenic Shipyards po potresu v Atenah posluje brez sprememb“, Lloyd ' s List International, 14. september 1999.
The letter by which Greece made comments on the opening decision.
Dopis, s katerim je Grčija predložila pripombe v zvezi z odločbo o sprožitvi postopka.
Figure from the letter of Greece dated 29 June 2007.
Podatek iz dopisa Grčije z dne 29. junija 2007.
On 19 May 1999, this credit line was converted from USD into EUR.
Ta kreditna linija je bila 19. maja 1999 pretvorjena iz USD v EUR.
As regards the possibility to collect money before the delivery of the products, the Commission refers to the document quoted in footnote 128, which is also referred to in footnote 123.
Kar zadeva možnost izterjave denarja pred dobavo proizvodov, se Komisija sklicuje na dokument, citiran v opombi 128, kar je navedeno tudi v opombi 123.
This due diligence report refers to a period after the reimbursement of the loans currently assessed.
To poročilo se nanaša na obdobje po odplačilu posojil, ki jih tukaj ocenjujemo.
However, it is useful to illustrate that before the delivery of a product, nearly no money is collectible.
Vendar pa je treba opozoriti, da pred dobavo proizvodov ni mogoče izterjati skoraj nobenega zneska.
This due diligence report shows in particular that on 31 December 2000, nearly no money was collectible from Strintzis, the Greek Navy, OSE and ISAP.
To poročilo kaže zlasti, da 31. decembra 2000 od podjetij Stintzis, OSE in ISAP ter od grške mornarice ni bilo mogoče izterjati skoraj nobenega denarja.
See Commission notice on the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 273, 9.9.1997, p. 3).
Glej Obvestilo Komisije o metodi določanja referenčnih obrestnih mer in diskontnih stopenj (UL C 273, 9.9.1997, str. 3).
This balance sheet appears in the documents submitted by TKMS and GNSH, described in footnote 128 of the present decision.
Ta bilanca stanja je vključena v dokument, ki sta ga predložili podjetji TKMS in GNSH, naveden v opombi 128 v tej odločbi.
In the case of the submarines, the conditions put by the Greek State lead to the result that the first submarine will be entirely built in Kiel (Germany) while the two following ones will be assembled in HSY (see recital 44 of the present decision).
V primeru podmornic bo zaradi pogojev, ki jih je določila grška država, prva podmornica v celoti zgrajena v Kielu (Nemčija), drugi dve pa bosta sestavljeni v podjetju HSY (glej uvodno izjavo 44 te odločbe).
It would most likely have been cheaper and more efficient to produce all three submarines in Germany.
Najverjetneje bi bilo ceneje in bolj učinkovito, če bi bile vse tri podmornice zgrajene v Nemčiji.
It would also have been more rationale not to include HSY, which was a firm in difficulty and in addition had no experience with submarines, within the consortium.
Bilo bi tudi bolj smiselno, da se podjetje HSY ne bi vključilo v konzorcij, saj je bilo v težavah, poleg tega pa ni imelo nikakršnih izkušenj s podmornicami.
At a point in time, these funds must have been necessary to cover the costs generated by the execution of the military contracts concerned.
V določenem trenutku so ta sredstva morala zadostovati za pokritje stroškov, ki so nastali pri izvrševanju zadevnih vojaških naročil.
At that point in time, the funds were not available anymore to finance other activities of HSY.
V tem trenutku ta sredstva niso bila več na razpolago za financiranje drugih dejavnosti podjetja HSY.
In other words, at that point in time, a part of the advantage granted by the State was withdrawn.
Z drugimi besedami, v tem trenutku je bil del prednosti, ki jih je odobrila država, ukinjen.
The remaining advantage was that during the preceding quarters, the yard has had at its disposal the funds for free, whereas it could not have borrowed that money from banks.
Preostala prednost je bila v tem, da je lahko v predhodnih trimesečjih ladjedelnica s sredstvi razpolagala zastonj, medtem ko si ni mogla izposoditi denarja od bank.
Page 30 of the letter of 30 October 2006.
Stran 30 dopisa z dne 30. oktobra 2006.
E.g. the very large debt waiver related to military activities was mentioned in decision C 10/94 but not assessed under State aid rules, the closure expenses related to military activities were mentioned in decision N 513/01 but not assessed under State aid rules, and the same was done with several measures in the extension decision.
Npr. odpis zelo visokega dolga, povezanega z vojaškimi dejavnostmi, je bil omenjen v odločbi C 10/94, vendar ni bil ocenjen na podlagi pravil o državni pomoči, stroški zaprtja, povezani z vojaškimi dejavnostmi, so bili omenjeni v odločbi N 513/01, vendar niso bili ocenjeni na podlagi pravil o državni pomoči, enako pa velja tudi za nekaj ukrepov iz odločbe o podaljšanju postopka.
For instance, the invitation to submit binding offers for the acquisition of shares of Hellenic Shipyards S.A. dated 2 July 2001 indicates that ‘It is stipulated that in the event that a fine is imposed pursuant to a potential breach of EC regulations regarding State aid, the highest bidder will not be responsible for the payment of such fine.
Na primer, v pozivu k oddaji ponudb za prevzem delnic podjetja Hellenic Shipyards S.A. z dne 2. julija 2001 je navedeno naslednje: „Določeno je, da v primeru kazni, naložene na podlagi potencialne kršitve predpisov ES v zvezi z državno pomočjo, najboljši ponudnik ne bo zadolžen za plačilo te kazni.
This assurance will take precedence over the transfer of the Shares’.
Ta zagotovitev ima prednost pred prenosom delnic“.
The minutes of the meeting held on 14 September 2001, which were signed by the parties, indicates that ‘It is agreed that EU-clearance will be a condition precedent to the closing of the contract subsequent to its signature.
V zapisniku s srečanja, ki je potekalo 14. septembra 2001, ki so ga podpisale vse stranke, je navedeno: „Dogovorjeno je, da bo opustitev s strani EU pogoj, ki bo imel prednost pred sklenitvijo pogodbe po podpisu le-te.
Alternatively, in the event that such a decision is delayed by the EU […] or it is not satisfactory, the parties agreed that ETBAbank will undertake the obligation to provide a guarantee to HDW-Ferrostaal in relation to any outstanding issues related to EU, regarding past and present state subsidies, if any, related to HSY’.
V kolikor pa bi EU s takšno odločitvijo zamujala […] ali ta odločitev ne bi bila zadovoljiva, so se stranke dogovorile, da bo banka ETVA prevzela dolžnost za zagotovitev poroštva konzorciju HDW/Ferrostaal za vse nedospele posle, povezane z EU v zvezi z morebitnimi preteklimi in tekočimi državnimi subvencijami, povezanimi s podjetjem HSY“.
Bank Pireaus submitted several press articles relating to the period October 2001 to May 2002 illustrating that the government was directly involved in the privatisation process of HSY.
Banka Piraeus Bank je predložila več časopisnih člankov, ki se nanašajo na obdobje od oktobra 2001 do maja 2002 in iz katerih je razvidno, da je bila vlada neposredno vpletena v proces privatizacije podjetja HSY.
The letter of 23 May 2005 indicates:‘The sale of HSY was conducted with the procedure of denationalisation (Law 2001/1990).
V dopisu z dne 23. maja 2005 je navedeno:„Prodaja podjetja HSY je bila opravljena s postopkom denacionalizacije (Zakon 2001/1990).
Consequently, as it is also underlined in the letter of 17.12.2004, it concerns not only a legal and financially common condition, but also a condition which is included in the negotiations for the privatisation of the Shipyard from the outset and, in particular, in the form of a critical (sine qua non) condition, without which the completion of the sale of HSY’s shares would not have been possible.
Zato, kar je tudi poudarjeno z dopisom z dne 17.12.2004, ta ne zadeva samo pravnega in finančnega splošnega pogoja, temveč je to tudi pogoj, ki je že od samega začetka vključen v pogajanja o privatizaciji podjetja Hellenic Shipyards, zlasti pa je to ključen pogoj (osnovni pogoj), brez katerega dokončanje prodaje delnic podjetja HSY ne bi bilo mogoče.
It is characteristic that, as it has been mentioned above, this condition, with different stipulations but always with the same objective, i.e. the reasonable facilitation of the transaction in the framework of the market rules, appears from the beginning of the privatisation procedure in the following texts:The Declaration of the AdvisorThe Invitation for the Submission of Binding OffersThe Offer of the Purchasing Joint Venture (particularly without being included in the Declaration of Quitting from its condition)In the texts of the Negotiations and, lastly,In the Share Purchasing Agreement of 11 October 2001.Consequently, the declaration of guarantee that is included to the addition of the guarantee contract of 31.5.2002 was addressed to the candidate bidder from the outset and therefore does not constitute state aid to the final purchaser.
Značilno je, da se, kot je bilo že omenjeno, ta pogoj, z različnimi določbami, vendar vedno z istim ciljem, tj. ustrezno pospeševanje transakcije v okviru tržnih pravil, pojavlja že od samega začetka postopka privatizacije v naslednjih besedilih:Izjava svetovalcaPoziv k oddaji zavezujočih ponudbPonudba nabavne mešane družbe (zlasti če ni vključena v Izjavo o odstopanju od njenih pogojev)V besedilih pogajanj inV Sporazumu o nakupu delnic z dne 11. oktobra 2001.Zaradi tega je izjava o poroštvu, ki je vključena v dodatek k pogodbi o poroštvu z dne 31. maja 2002, bila naslovljena na kandidata ponudnika že na samem začetku in za končnega kupca ne pomeni državne pomoči.
The same condition would have been valid for every bidder, since, as it has already been mentioned, it has been included in the procedure of denationalisation.
Isti pogoj bi veljal za vsakega ponudnika, saj je bil, kot je bilo že omenjeno, vključen v postopek denacionalizacije.
It is also self-evident that, since the procedure of denationalisation began in February 2001 (at a time when the main shareholder of the then selling Bank ETVA was the Greek State), the State, as a seller of ETVA to Bank Piraeus, ought to also provide and did actually provide its own guarantee to the purchaser of its shares in ETVA (Bank of Piraeus), regarding the asset that was for sale, i.e. the Shipyards, because the seller had to provide such a guarantee.
Samoumevno je tudi, glede na to, da se je postopek denacionalizacije pričel februarja 2001 (v času, ko je glavni delničar banke ETVA, ki se je v tistem času prodajala, bila grška država), da je država kot prodajalka banke ETVA banki Piraeus Bank tudi morala ponuditi in je dejansko res ponudila lastno poroštvo kupcu njenih delnic v banki ETVA (banka Piraeus Bank) v zvezi s premoženjem, ki je bilo naprodaj, tj. ladjedelnico, saj je prodajalec moral dati takšno poroštvo.
These guarantees, which, as it has already been stressed, are included with absolute transparency and clarity in all the contractual texts of the denationalisation and mainly in the promissory contract of 11.10.2001, pertain to the character of the transaction (sale of a definite asset), are valid for all candidate bidders and do not confer any additional benefit to anyone.
Ta poroštva, ki so, kot je bilo že poudarjeno, popolnoma pregledno in jasno vključena v vsa besedila pogodb o denacionalizaciji in predvsem v zadolžno pogodbo z dne 11. oktobra 2001, in ki se nanašajo na lastnost transakcije (prodaja točno določenega premoženja), so veljavna za vse ponudnike in nikomur ne prinašajo nikakršnih dodatnih koristi.