natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This concerned only one Community producer for sales during the first year of the period considered.
Ta prodaja je zadevala le enega proizvajalca Skupnosti v prvem letu obravnavanega obdobja.
It was therefore considered that this had only a negligible, if any, impact at all on the overall situation.
Zato se je štelo, da je bil njen morebiten učinek na celotno stanje neznaten.
As far as the determination of the total Community consumption is concerned, it was considered that the methodology used at provisional stage was reasonable and has given a fairly complete picture of the actual situation.
V zvezi z določitvijo skupne potrošnje Skupnosti se je štelo, da je bila metoda iz začasne faze ustrezna, in da je dala dokaj popolno sliko dejanskega stanja.
The Armenian exporting producer did not explain in what way the methodology used by the Community institutions was not reasonable and would, as a consequence, lead to unreliable results.
Armenski proizvajalec izvoznik ni pojasnil, zakaj bi bila metoda, ki so jo uporabile institucije Skupnosti, neprimerna in zakaj bi bili njeni rezultati nezanesljivi.
The study quoted by the Armenian Exporting producer was not found to be directly relevant as it referred to different types of aluminium foil and included data for non-EU companies which could not be verified.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da študija, ki jo je navedel armenski proizvajalec izvoznik, ni bila neposredno relevantna, saj se je nanašala na različne vrste aluminijaste folije in vsebovala podatke za družbe izven EU, ki jih ni bilo mogoče preveriti.
Furthermore, the provisional findings for the total Community consumption included in Table 1 under recital 90 of the provisional Regulation were confirmed by other interested parties, including importers unrelated to the CI.
Poleg tega so druge zainteresirane stranke, vključno z uvozniki, ki niso povezani z industrijo Skupnosti, potrdili začasne ugotovitve glede celotne potrošnje Skupnosti iz preglednice 1 uvodne izjave 90 začasne uredbe.
On the basis of the above, it was concluded that the total Community consumption as established in the provisional Regulation gives a reliable picture of the actual situation.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je bilo sklenjeno, da daje celotna potrošnja Skupnosti, določena v začasni uredbi, zanesljivo sliko dejanskega stanja.
In the absence of any other comments concerning Community consumption, recitals 88 to 90 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s potrošnjo Skupnosti ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave od 88 do 90 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Subsequent to the provisional disclosure, the Brazilian exporting producer reiterated that the product originating in Brazil meets higher quality standards, such as a minimum tensile strength and elongation requirements allowing for a wider range of applications and sales to a wider range of customers compared to the product exported by the other two countries concerned.
Po začasnem razkritju je brazilski proizvajalec izvoznik ponovil, da izdelek s poreklom iz Brazilije, izpolnjuje višje standarde kakovosti, na primer zahteve glede najmanjše natezne trdnosti in raztezka, ki omogočajo širši razpon uporabe in prodajo širšemu krogu strank v primerjavi z izdelkom, ki ga izvažata drugi dve zadevni državi.
Thus, it was alleged that there were different market segments for aluminium foil depending on the quality of the product and that only the Brazilian product meets the standards to be sold in the high end market of branded products.
Tako naj bi obstajali različni tržni segmenti za aluminijasto folijo glede na kakovost in samo brazilski izdelek naj bi ustrezal standardom za prodajo na končnih trgih visokokakovostnih izdelkov blagovnih znamk.
The Brazilian exporter also reiterated that sales channels and distribution methods for its products were different.
Brazilski izvoznik je ponovil tudi, da imajo njegovi izdelki različne prodajne poti in načine distribucije.
In particular, it was argued that the Brazilian exports were mainly made via traders while the Armenian and Chinese exporting producers sell directly to the rewinders in the Community.
Zlasti je trdil, da se Brazilija izvaža predvsem prek trgovcev, medtem ko armenski in kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki prodajajo neposredno previjalcem v Skupnosti.
It was also claimed that the Brazilian exporter has long standing and stable business relationships with specific customers in the Community, while the exporters from Armenia and the PRC have only just recently entered the Community market.
Brazilski izvoznik naj bi domnevno imel tudi dolgoletne in trdne poslovne odnose z določenimi strankami v Skupnosti, medtem ko naj bi izvoznika iz Armenije in LRK šele pred kratkim vstopila na trg Skupnosti.
Finally, the same exporting producer argued that trends concerning import volumes and market shares were different from those of the other exporting countries which would show that the conditions of competition were indeed different.
Nazadnje je isti proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da se gibanja glede obsega uvoza in tržnega deleža razlikujejo od gibanj drugih držav izvoznic, kar kaže, da so konkurenčni pogoji dejansko različni.
With regard to the first allegation, i.e. the difference in quality standards, the investigation revealed that despite quality differences, the aluminium foil market was mainly price driven and quality differences played only a minor role in the choice of a supplier.
Glede prve trditve, tj. o različnih standardih kakovosti, je preiskava pokazala, da je na trgu z aluminijasto folijo kljub razlikam v kakovosti najpomembnejša cena in da imajo te razlike pri izbiri dobavitelja le manjšo vlogo.
These findings were confirmed by the cooperating importers and users concerned.
Te ugotovitve so potrdili sodelujoči uvozniki in zadevni uporabniki.
Thus, the unsubstantiated allegation of the Brazilian exporting producer, i.e. that the aluminium foil market was divided into several segments according to quality differences of the product, could not be confirmed during the present investigation and the claim made in this regard had to be rejected.
Neutemeljena trditev brazilskega proizvajalca izvoznika, da je trg aluminijaste folije razdeljen na več segmentov glede na razlike v kakovosti izdelka, med sedanjo preiskavo torej ni mogla biti potrjena in zahtevek s tem v zvezi je bilo treba zavrniti.
As far as the alleged different sales channels and distribution methods are concerned, it is noted that the Brazilian exporting producer does not contest that it sold its products both via an unrelated trader and directly to rewinders in the Community.
Kar zadeva domnevne različne prodajne poti in načine distribucije, se opozarja, da brazilski proizvajalec izvoznik ne ugovarja, da je prodajal svoje izdelke tako prek nepovezanega trgovca kot neposredno previjalcem v Skupnosti.
On this basis, it was considered that sales channels were the same.
Na podlagi tega se je štelo, da so prodajne poti iste.
The fact that the Brazilian exporter would have built up long standing business relations during the past years does not preclude, as such, those products being under the same conditions of competition with products of competitors newly entering a market.
Dejstvo, da je brazilski izvoznik v preteklosti vzpostavil dolgoročne poslovne odnose, samo po sebi ne pomeni, da takšni izdelki ne bi mogli imeti enakih konkurenčnih pogojev kot izdelki konkurentov, ki so pravkar vstopili na trg.
Indeed, the exporting producer did not claim or show that its customers would not switch to other suppliers should they consider it suitable.
Proizvajalec izvoznik dejansko ni trdil ali dokazal, da njegove stranke ne bi prešle k drugim dobaviteljem, če bi se jim zdelo to primerno.
Therefore, the fact, that the Brazilian exporter has a long presence on the Community market does not allow the conclusion that its products are in different conditions of competition than the products imported from Armenia and the PRC.
Zato na podlagi dejstva, da je brazilski izvoznik na trgu Skupnosti že dolgo prisoten, ni mogoče sklepati, da imajo njegovi izdelki drugačne konkurenčne pogoje od izdelkov, uvoženih iz Armenije in LRK.
The claim made in this regard was consequently rejected.
Zahtevek s tem v zvezi je bil zato zavrnjen.
Finally, regarding different import trends, the Brazilian exporting producer did not submit any additional information or evidence and the provisional findings as set out in recital 93 are thus hereby confirmed.
Nazadnje pa v zvezi z različnimi uvoznimi gibanji brazilski proizvajalec izvoznik ni predložil nobenih dodatnih informacij ali dokazov in začasne ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 93 se tako potrdijo.
Subsequent to the provisional disclosure, the Armenian exporting producer argued that Armenian imports should be decumulated for the purpose of the injury analysis given the low import volumes, its low market share and the flat import trends as well as the allegedly significant quality differences between the product exported from Armenia and the ones exported from Brazil and the PRC.
Po začasnem razkritju je armenski proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da se pri analizi škode armenski uvoz ne bi smel kumulirati glede na majhen obseg uvoza, njegov majhen tržni delež in neživahno gibanje uvoza ter domnevno znatne razlike med izdelkom, izvoženim iz Armenije, ter izdelkoma iz Brazilije in LRK.
This claim could not be accepted because it was found that all conditions for cumulation as set out in Article 3(4) of the basic Regulation were met:
Ta trditev ni mogla biti sprejeta, ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da so izpolnjeni vsi pogoji za kumulacijo iz člena 3(4) osnovne uredbe:
as provisionally established and as confirmed above in recitals 38 to 39, the dumping margin established for Armenia was above the de minimis threshold as defined in Article 9(3) of the basic Regulation,
kot je bilo začasno ugotovljeno in potrjeno v uvodnih izjavah 38 in 39, je bila ugotovljena stopnja nad pragom de minimis, kakor je opredeljen v členu 9(3) osnovne uredbe,
the volume of imports from Armenia was not negligible in the sense of Article 5(7) of the basic Regulation, i.e. its market shares attained 5,26 % as outlined in recital 96 (Table 4) of the provisional Regulation.
obseg uvoza iz Armenije ni bil zanemarljiv v smislu člena 5(7) osnovne uredbe, saj je njegov tržni delež znašal 5,26 %, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 96 (preglednica 4) začasne uredbe.
It was also found that imports from Armenia grew significantly from 2006 to the end of the IP despite the re-entry of imports from the PRC and the significant imports from Brazil during the period considered,
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da se je uvoz iz Armenije od leta 2006 do konca OP bistveno povečal kljub ponovnemu uvozu iz LRK in znatnemu uvozu iz Brazilije v obravnavanem obdobju,
with regard to the conditions of competition between the imported products from the countries concerned and, in particular, with regard to the arguments made in relation to significant quality differences between the products imported, as set out above in recital 52, it was found that the products from Armenia have similar basic physical and technical characteristics and were used in the same basic applications regardless of their specific quality.
glede na konkurenčne pogoje med uvoženimi izdelki iz zadevnih držav in zlasti glede na argumente v zvezi z znatnimi razlikami v kakovosti med uvoženimi izdelki v skladu z uvodno izjavo 52, je bilo ugotovljeno, da imajo izdelki iz Armenije enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter da se uporabljajo za iste osnovne načine uporabe, ne glede na njihovo kakovost.
It is also noted that this exporting producer stated its intention to shift production to even higher quality converter foils which indicates that the argument concerning the allegedly bad quality of products produced may be exaggerated.
Opozoriti je tudi treba, da je ta proizvajalec izvoznik izjavil, da namerava preusmeriti proizvodnjo na konvertersko aluminijasto folijo še višje kakovosti, kar kaže, da je argument glede domnevno slabe kakovosti proizvedenih izdelkov morda pretiran.
The claims made in this regard by the Armenian exporting producer were therefore rejected.
Trditve armenskega proizvajalce izvoznika v zvezi s tem so bile zato zavrnjene.
In the absence of any other comments made in relation to the cumulative assessment of the effects of the imports concerned in accordance with Article 3(4) of the basic Regulation, the provisional conclusions as set out in recitals 91 to 94 of the provisional Regulation are herewith confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb glede kumulativne ocene učinkov zadevnega uvoza v skladu s členom 3(4) osnovne uredbe, se potrdijo začasni sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 91 do 94 začasne uredbe.
Volume and market share of the countries concerned
Obseg in tržni delež zadevnih držav
In the absence of any comments with regard to the imports from the countries concerned, the findings as set out in recitals 95 and 96 of the provisional Regulation are herewith confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb glede uvoza iz zadevnih držav, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 95 in 96 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments with regard to the prices of the imports concerned, the findings as set out in recital 97 of the provisional Regulation are herewith confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb glede cen zadevnega uvoza, se ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 97 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The exporting producer in Brazil contested the methodology used to calculate the undercutting margin applicable to it.
Proizvajalec izvoznik v Braziliji je nasprotoval metodologiji izračuna zanj veljavne stopnje nelojalnega nižanja cen.
In this regard, the exporting producer claimed that the calculation of the undercutting margins was not made on the same level of trade.
S tem v zvezi je proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da izračun nelojalnega nižanja cen ni bil narejen na isti stopnji trgovine.
Thus, it was claimed that export sales from Brazil were mainly made to an unrelated importer which resells the product to rewinders whereas the CI’s sales were made directly to the rewinders.
Trdil je, da se iz Brazilije izvaža in prodaja predvsem nepovezanemu uvozniku, ki izdelek prodaja naprej previjalcem, medtem ko industrija Skupnosti prodaja previjalcem neposredno.
Therefore, it was claimed that SG&A and profit of the trader should have been added to the export price.
Zato naj bi bilo po njegovih trditvah izvozni ceni treba prišteti PSA-stroške in dobiček trgovca.
The investigation has revealed that contrary to what was alleged by the Brazilian exporting producer, exports sales were not mainly made to an unrelated importer as over 70 % of its exports sales were made directly to the rewinders.
Preiskava je pokazala, da v nasprotju s trditvami brazilskega proizvajalca izvoznika izvoz ni bil prodan predvsem nepovezanemu uvozniku, saj je bilo 70 % izvoza prodanega neposredno previjalcem.
Likewise, the investigation has revealed that the CI sold the product concerned predominantly to rewinders, albeit some sales were made to traders.
Prav tako je preiskava razkrila, da je industrija Skupnosti zadevni izdelek sicer prodajala pretežno previjalcem, vendar je bilo nekaj prodanega tudi trgovcem.
Therefore, it was decided, also in order to ensure that the comparison was nevertheless made on the same level of trade, to exclude sales made to the trader, and base the calculation of the price undercutting solely on direct sales to rewinders.
Zato, in da bi bila primerjava vendarle narejena na isti ravni trgovine, je bilo sklenjeno, da se izključi prodaja trgovcem in se pri izračunu nelojalnega nižanja cen upošteva samo neposredna prodaja previjalcem.
Since these sales represented more than 70 % of the exporting producer’s total sales to the Community, this was considered as representative.
To se je štelo za reprezentativno, saj ta prodaja predstavlja več kot 70 % skupne prodaje proizvajalca izvoznika v Skupnost.
Another argument put forward by the same exporting producer in Brazil was that an adjustment taking into consideration quality differences between the imported product and the CI product should have been made.
Drugi argument istega proizvajalca izvoznika v Braziliji je bil, da je potrebna prilagoditev, s katero bi se upoštevale razlike v kakovosti med uvoženim izdelkom in izdelkom industrije Skupnosti.
However, the investigation clearly showed that the issue of quality is not a determining factor, as the end user choice is more determined by the price and not by eventual differences in quality (e.g. thickness of the foil).
Vendar je preiskava jasno pokazala, da vprašanje kakovosti ni odločilen dejavnik, saj se končni uporabnik odloča na podlagi cene in ne morebitnih razlik v kakovosti (npr. debeline folije).
On the basis of the above, the weighted average price undercutting, expressed as a percentage of the CI’s sales prices to independent customers on an ex-works level, was 9,6 % for Brazil.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega, je tehtano povprečje nelojalnega nižanja cen, izraženo kot odstotek prodajnih cen industrije Skupnosti neodvisnim strankam na ravni franko tovarna, za Brazilijo znašalo 9,6 %.
In the absence of any other comments with regard to the undercutting, the findings as set out in recitals 98 to 100 of the provisional Regulation are herewith confirmed.
Ker glede nelojalnega nižanja cen ni bilo drugih pripomb, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od 98 do 100 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
As mentioned in recital 42, the injury factors were determined on the basis of the verified information of five Community producers.
Kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi 42, so bili dejavniki škode določeni na podlagi preverjenih informacij petih proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
A sixth Community producer submitted a questionnaire reply after the provisional determination which could, however, no longer be verified and was therefore not taken into consideration in the definitive determination.
Šesti proizvajalec Skupnosti je predložil izpolnjeni vprašalnik po sprejetju začasne ugotovitve, ki pa ga ni bilo več mogoče preveriti in zato ni bil upoštevan pri dokončni ugotovitvi.
Following the completion of all on-the-spot verification visits, some of the injury factors had to be revised on the basis of the evidence found in the visited companies.
Po koncu vseh preveritvenih obiskov na kraju samem, je bilo treba na podlagi dokazov, najdenih v obiskanih družbah, nekatere dejavnike škode pregledati in popraviti.
Therefore, in accordance with Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, the examination of the impact of the dumped imports on the CI and the evaluation of all economic factors having a bearing on the state of the CI during the period considered had to be revised accordingly.
Zato je bilo treba v skladu s členom 3(5) osnovne uredbe proučitev vpliva dampinškega uvoza na industrijo Skupnosti in oceno vseh gospodarskih dejavnikov, ki so vplivali na stanje industrije Skupnosti v obravnavanem obdobju, ustrezno pregledati.
Table 1:
Preglednica 1:
As can be seen from the table above, production volume from the CI still showed a clearly negative trend between 2005 and the IP.
Kot je razvidno iz gornje preglednice, je obseg proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti med letom 2005 in OP kazal jasno negativen trend.
As far as the overall production capacity is concerned, the definitive findings confirmed the decrease of the capacity utilisation during the period considered.
Kar zadeva skupno proizvodno zmogljivost, so dokončne ugotovitve v obravnavanem obdobju potrdile padec izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti.
The table below shows the CI performance in relation to its sales to independent customers in the Community.
Spodnja preglednica prikazuje zmogljivost industrije Skupnosti pri prodaji neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti.
Table 2:
Preglednica 2:
Unit prices in EUR/tonne
Cene na enoto v EUR/tono
As provisionally established, while Community consumption increased by 4 % during the period considered, the CI’s sales volume decreased by 30 %, i.e. the CI could not benefit from the increased consumption.
Kot je bilo začasno ugotovljeno, se je potrošnja Skupnosti v obravnavanem obdobju povečala za 4 %, medtem ko se je obseg prodaje industrije Skupnosti znižal za 30 %, kar pomeni, da industrija Skupnosti ni mogla imeti koristi od povečanja potrošnje.
Consequently, the CI’s market share decreased from 48 % in 2005 to 33 % in the IP.
Zato se je tržni delež industrije Skupnosti zmanjšal z 48 % v 2005 na 33 % v OP.
Thus, as far as the CI performance in relation to its sales to independent customers in the Community is concerned, the definitive findings did not significantly change the situation provisionally found.
Kar zadeva uspešnost industrije Skupnosti pri prodaji neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti, dokončne ugotovitve bistveno niso spremenile začasno ugotovljenega stanja.
Table 3:
Preglednica 3:
As mentioned in recital 107 of the provisional Regulation, the investigation revealed that stocks cannot be considered as a meaningful injury factor since the vast majority of production is made in response to orders.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 107 začasne uredbe, je preiskava pokazala, da zalog ni mogoče šteti za pomemben dejavnik škode, saj je velika večina proizvodnje opravljena na podlagi naročil.
Although the definitive findings now show a significant increase of 32 % of stock levels, this was found to be due to a spot light stock by one company and therefore not representative of any trend.
Kljub temu pa dokončne ugotovitve kažejo znatno povečanje ravni zalog, in sicer za 32 %, ki je bilo po ugotovitvah posledica zaloge že prodanega, a še nedobavljenega blaga ene družbe in zato ne more biti reprezentativno za kakršno koli gibanje.
Investment of the CI decreased significantly; i.e. the trend established in the provisional Regulation in recital 108 is confirmed.
Naložbe industrije Skupnosti so se znatno zmanjšale, zato se gibanje, ugotovljeno v uvodni izjavi 108 začasne uredbe, potrdi.
In the absence of any significant change and comments with regard to investments made by the CI between 2005 and the IP, the findings as set out in recital 108 of the provisional Regulation are therefore herewith confirmed.
Ker ni bilo znatnih sprememb in pripomb glede naložb industrije Skupnosti med 2005 in OP, se ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 108 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Table 5:
Preglednica 5:
The table above shows that the profitability of the CI has slightly improved during the period considered, albeit remaining negative in the IP and in particular well below the target profit of 5 %.
Zgornja preglednica kaže, da se je dobičkonosnost industrije Skupnosti med obravnavanim obdobjem rahlo izboljšala, vendar je v OP kljub temu ostala negativna, predvsem pa znatno pod ciljnim dobičkom 5 %.
As shown in Tables 1 and 2 above, the investigation revealed that the deterioration of the CI was mainly translated in a significant decrease of the CI’s production volume and sales volume.
Kot je razvidno iz preglednic 1 in 2 zgoraj, je preiskava razkrila, da se je oslabitev industrije Skupnosti odrazila predvsem v znatnem zmanjšanju obsega proizvodnje in prodaje industrije Skupnosti.
This indicates that the CI, faced with dumped imports, has lost sales volumes and market shares in an effort to eliminate losses.
To kaže, da se je industrija Skupnosti, soočena z dampinškim uvozom, odpovedala obsegu prodaje in tržnemu deležu, da bi zmanjšala izgube.
In conclusion, despite the CI achieving marginal profits in 2007, it again made small losses in the IP, and therefore, the CI can be regarded as having suffered material injury.
Če povzamemo, industrija Skupnosti je kljub majhnemu dobičku leta 2007 imela v OP spet majhno izgubo, zato se šteje, da je utrpela znatno škodo.
The revised findings on profitability did not alter the provisional conclusions in this respect and the definitive findings do not detract from the conclusion that overall profitability remained very low, if not negative despite the fact that consumption increased substantially in 2007 and during the IP.
Revidirane ugotovitve glede dobičkonosnosti v zvezi s tem niso spremenile začasnih sklepnih ugotovitev in dokončne ugotovitve ne spreminjajo sklepa, da je splošna dobičkonosnost ostala zelo nizka, če ne negativna, kljub temu da je se je potrošnja leta 2007 in v OP znatno povečala.