natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On 17 April 2007, Bayer CropScience AG submitted to the Commission an application, in accordance with Articles 8(4) and 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, for the authorisation of existing products produced from T45 oilseed rape (food additives and feed materials produced from T45 oilseed rape).
Bayer CropScience AG je 17. aprila 2007 Komisiji v skladu s členoma 8(4) in 20(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 predložil vlogo za izdajo dovoljenja za obstoječe proizvode iz oljne ogrščice T45 (aditivi za živila in posamična krmila iz oljne ogrščice T45).
The applicant indicated in its applications and in communications to the Commission that the commercialisation of T45 oilseed rape seeds was stopped after the 2005 planting season.
Vložnik je v svojih vlogah in v sporočilih Komisiji navedel, da je bilo trženje semen oljne ogrščice T45 prekinjeno po setveni sezoni 2005.
Therefore, the only purpose of these applications is to cover the presence of T45 oilseed rape resulting from its past cultivation in third countries.
Zato je edini namen teh vlog, da se zajame prisotnost oljne ogrščice T45, ker se je v preteklosti gojila v tretjih državah.
On 5 March 2008, the European Food Safety Authority (‘EFSA’) gave a single comprehensive favourable opinion for both applications in accordance with Articles 6 and 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and concluded that it is unlikely that the placing on the market of the products containing or produced from T45 oilseed rape as described in the applications (‘the products’) will have any adverse effects on human or animal health or the environment in the context of their intended uses [3].
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane („Agencija“) je 5. marca 2008 v skladu s členoma 6 in 18 Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 dala enotno celovito pozitivno mnenje za obe vlogi in sklenila, da ni verjetno, da bi dajanje na trg proizvodov, ki vsebujejo oljno ogrščico T45 ali so iz nje proizvedeni, kakor je opisano v vlogah („proizvodi“), v okviru predvidene uporabe [3] škodljivo vplivalo na zdravje ljudi, živali ali okolje.
In its opinion, EFSA considered all the specific questions and concerns raised by the Member States in the context of the consultation of the national competent authorities as provided for by Articles 6(4) and 18(4) of that Regulation.
Agencija je v svojem mnenju preučila vsa specifična vprašanja in pomisleke držav članic v okviru posvetovanja s pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi, kakor je določeno v členih 6(4) in 18(4) navedene uredbe.
In particular, EFSA concluded that as no indication of biologically relevant compositional and agronomical changes was identified for seeds from T45 oilseed rape except the presence of the PAT protein, no further animal safety studies with the whole food/feed (e.g. a 90-day toxicity study in rats) are needed.
Agencija je sklenila, da za nobena živila/krmo niso potrebne nadaljnje študije varnosti na živalih (npr. 90-dnevna študija o toksičnosti pri podganah), ker v semenih oljne ogrščice T45 niso bile najdene biološko pomembne spremembe v sestavi niti agronomske spremembe, razen prisotnost proteina PAT.
In its opinion, EFSA also concluded that the environmental monitoring plan, consisting of a general surveillance plan, submitted by the applicant is in line with the intended use of the products.
Agencija je v svojem mnenju tudi ugotovila, da je načrt za spremljanje okolja, sestavljen iz splošnega načrta za spremljanje, ki ga je predložil vložnik, v skladu z nameravano uporabo proizvodov.
However, due to the physical characteristics of oilseed rape seeds and methods of transportation, EFSA recommended that appropriate management systems should be in place to minimise accidental loss and spillage of transgenic oilseed rape during transportation, storage, handling and processing.
Vendar je Agencija zaradi fizikalnih lastnosti semen oljne ogrščice in načinov prevoza priporočila uvedbo ustreznih sistemov upravljanja, ki bodo čim bolj zmanjšali nenamerno izgubo in razsutje transgene oljne ogrščice med prevozom, skladiščenjem, uporabo in predelavo.
The monitoring plan submitted by the applicant has been modified to take into account this EFSA recommendation.
Načrt spremljanja, ki ga je predložil vložnik, je bil spremenjen tako, da je bilo upoštevano to priporočilo Agencije.
In order to monitor the phasing out of T45 oilseed rape, its presence in imported products should be regularly reported.
Zaradi spremljanja postopne odprave oljne ogrščice T45 je treba redno poročati o njeni prisotnosti v uvoženih proizvodih.
Taking into account those considerations, it is appropriate to grant an authorisation to cover the presence in products of T45 oilseed rape resulting from the commercialisation of T45 oilseed rape seeds in third countries until 2005.
Ob upoštevanju teh pomislekov je primerno izdati dovoljenje, da se zajame prisotnost oljne ogrščice T45 v proizvodih, ker so se do leta 2005 v tretjih državah tržila semena oljne ogrščice T45.
A unique identifier should be assigned to each GMO as provided for in Commission Regulation (EC) No 65/2004 of 14 January 2004 establishing a system for the development and assignment of unique identifiers for genetically modified organisms [4].
Vsakemu gensko spremenjenemu organizmu je treba dodeliti poseben identifikator, kakor določa Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 65/2004 z dne 14. januarja 2004 o vzpostavitvi sistema za razvijanje in dodeljevanje posebnih identifikatorjev za gensko spremenjene organizme [4].
On the basis of the EFSA opinion, no specific labelling requirements other than those provided for in Articles 13(1) and 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, appear to be necessary for foods, food ingredients and feed containing, or produced from T45 oilseed rape.
Po mnenju Agencije za živila, živilske sestavine in krmo, ki vsebujejo oljno ogrščico T45 ali so iz nje proizvedeni, niso potrebne nobene posebne zahteve za označevanje, razen tistih iz členov 13(1) in 25(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003.
However, in order to ensure the use of the products within the limits of the authorisation provided for by this Decision, the labelling of feed containing the GMO and other products than food and feed containing the GMO for which authorisation is requested should be complemented by a clear indication that the products in question must not be used for cultivation.
Vendar mora biti iz oznak krme, ki vsebuje gensko spremenjene organizme, in drugih proizvodov, ki niso živila in krma ter vsebujejo gensko spremenjene organizme in za katere je predložen zahtevek za izdajo dovoljenja, jasno razvidno, da se zadevni proizvodi ne smejo uporabljati za gojenje, tako da se zagotovi uporaba proizvodov v okviru dovoljenja iz te odločbe.
Similarly, the EFSA opinion does not justify the imposition of specific conditions or restrictions for the placing on the market and/or specific conditions or restrictions for the use and handling, including post-market monitoring requirements, or of specific conditions for the protection of particular ecosystems/environment and/or geographical areas, as provided for in point (e) of Articles 6(5) and 18(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
Na podlagi mnenja Agencije tudi ni utemeljena uvedba posebnih pogojev ali omejitev za dajanje na trg in/ali posebnih pogojev ali omejitev za uporabo in ravnanje, vključno z zahtevami za spremljanje po začetku trženja, ali posebnih pogojev za zaščito posebnih ekosistemov/okolja in/ali geografskih območij, kakor je določeno v točki (e) členov 6(5) in 18(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003.
All relevant information on the authorisation of the products should be entered in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
Vse ustrezne informacije iz dovoljenja za proizvode je treba vnesti v register Skupnosti za gensko spremenjena živila in krmo, kakor določa Uredba (ES) št. 1829/2003.
This Decision is to be notified through the Biosafety Clearing-House to the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity pursuant to Articles 9(1) and 15(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1946/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2003 on transboundary movements of genetically modified organisms [6].
O tej odločbi je treba prek Urada za izmenjavo informacij o biološki varnosti obvestiti podpisnice Kartagenskega protokola biološke varnosti h Konvenciji o biološki raznovrstnosti v skladu s členom 9(1) in členom 15(2)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 1946/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. julija 2003 o čezmejnem gibanju gensko spremenjenih organizmov [6].
The applicant has been consulted on the measures provided for in this Decision.
O ukrepih, predvidenih v tej odločbi, je bil opravljen posvet z vložnikom.
The Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health has not delivered an opinion within the time limit laid down by its Chairman; the Commission has therefore submitted a proposal to the Council on 30 October 2008 in accordance with Article 5 of the Council Decision 1999/468/EC [7], the Council being required to act within three months.
Stalni odbor za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ni izdal mnenja v roku, ki ga je določil njegov predsednik, zato je Komisija 30. oktobra 2008 Svetu predložila predlog v skladu s členom 5 Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES [7], Svet pa bi moral ukrepati v treh mesecih.
However, the Council has not acted within the required time limit; a Decision should now be adopted by the Commission,
Vendar Svet ni ukrepal v določenem roku; Odločbo mora zdaj sprejeti Komisija –
Genetically modified organism and unique identifier
Gensko spremenjeni organizem in posebni identifikator
Genetically modified oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)
Gensko spremenjeni oljni ogrščici (Brassica napus L.)
T45, as specified in point (b) of the Annex to this Decision, is assigned the unique identifier ACS-BNØØ8-2, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 65/2004.
T45, opredeljeni v točki (b) Priloge k tej odločbi, se dodeli posebni identifikator ACS-BNØØ8-2, kakor je določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 65/2004.
The purpose of this Decision is to grant an authorisation covering, for the products referred to in paragraph 2, the presence of ACS-BNØØ8-2 oilseed rape resulting directly or indirectly from the commercialisation, until 2005, of ACS-BNØØ8-2 oilseed rape seeds in third countries.
Namen te odločbe je izdati dovoljenje, ki bo za proizvode iz odstavka 2 zajemalo neposredno ali posredno prisotnost oljne ogrščice ACS-BNØØ8-2 zaradi trženja njenih semen v tretjih državah do leta 2005.
The following products are authorised for the purposes of Articles 4(2) and 16(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 in accordance with the conditions set out in this Decision:
Za namene členov 4(2) in 16(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 se v skladu s pogoji iz te odločbe izdajo dovoljenja za naslednje proizvode:
foods and food ingredients containing or produced from ACS-BNØØ8-2 oilseed rape;
živila in živilske sestavine, ki vsebujejo oljno ogrščico ACS-BNØØ8-2 ali so iz nje proizvedeni;
feed containing or produced from ACS-BNØØ8-2 oilseed rape;
krma, ki vsebuje oljno ogrščico ACS-BNØØ8-2 ali je iz nje proizvedena;
products other than food and feed containing ACS-BNØØ8-2 oilseed rape for the same uses as any other oilseed rape with the exception of cultivation.
proizvodi, ki niso živila in krma ter vsebujejo oljno ogrščico ACS-BNØØ8-2 za enako uporabo kot katera koli druga oljna ogrščica, razen za gojenje.
For the purposes of the labelling requirements laid down in Articles 13(1) and 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘oilseed rape’.
Za namene zahtev za označevanje iz členov 13(1) in 25(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 ter člena 4(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1830/2003 je „ime organizma“„oljna ogrščica“.
The words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in documents accompanying products containing ACS-BNØØ8-2 oilseed rape referred to in Article 2(2)(b) and (c).
Besede „ni za gojenje“ se navedejo na oznakah proizvodov iz člena 2.2(b) in (c), ki vsebujejo oljno ogrščico ACS-BNØØ8-2, in v dokumentih, priloženih k navedenim proizvodom.
The authorisation holder shall ensure that the monitoring plan for environmental effects, as set out in point (h) of the Annex, is put in place and implemented.
Imetnik dovoljenja zagotovi, da se načrt za spremljanje vplivov na okolje uvede in izvaja, kakor je opredeljeno v točki (h) Priloge.
The authorisation holder shall submit to the Commission annual reports on the implementation and the results of the activities set out in the monitoring activities.
Imetnik dovoljenja Komisiji predloži letna poročila o izvajanju in rezultatih dejavnosti, navedenih v dejavnostih spremljanja.
Monitoring of the phasing out
Spremljanje postopne odprave
The authorisation holder shall ensure that shipments of oilseed rape imported in the European Union from a third country in which ACS-BNØØ8-2 oilseed rape seeds were commercialised until 2005 are sampled and tested for the presence of ACS-BNØØ8-2 oilseed rape.
Imenik dovoljenja zagotovi, da se pošiljke oljne ogrščice, uvožene v Evropsko unijo iz tretje države, v kateri so se do leta 2005 tržila semena oljne ogrščice ACS-BNØØ8-2, vzorčijo in testirajo na prisotnost oljne ogrščice ACS-BNØØ8-2.
The method used for the sampling of oilseed rape shall be internationally recognised.
Za vzorčenje oljne ogrščice se uporabi mednarodno priznana metoda.
The testing shall be made in a duly accredited laboratory and in accordance with the validated method of detection as set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Testiranje se opravi v ustreznem pooblaščenem laboratoriju in v skladu s potrjeno metodo za odkrivanje iz Priloge k tej odločbi.
The authorisation holder shall submit to the Commission, together with the reports referred to in Article 4(2), annual reports on the monitoring activities for the presence of ACS-BNØØ8-2 oilseed rape.
Imetnik dovoljenja mora Komisiji skupaj s poročili iz člena 4(2) predložiti letno poročilo o spremljanju dejavnosti za odkrivanje prisotnosti oljne ogrščice ACS-BNØØ8-2
The authorisation holder shall be Bayer CropScience AG.
Imetnik dovoljenja je Bayer Cropscience AG.
This Decision is addressed to Bayer CropScience AG, Alfred-Nobel-Straße 50, 40789 Monheim am Rhein, Germany.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Bayer CropScience AG, Alfred-Nobel-Straße 50, 40789 Monheim am Rhein, Nemčija.
Done at Brussels, 10 March 2009.
V Bruslju, 10. marca 2009
Address Alfred-Nobel-Straße 50, 40789 Monheim am Rhein, Germany .
Naslov Alfred-Nobel-Straße 50, 40789 Monheim am Rhein, Nemčija
Foods and food ingredients containing or produced from ACS-BNØØ8-2 oilseed rape.
živila in živilske sestavine, ki vsebujejo oljno ogrščico ACS-BNØØ8-2 ali so iz nje proizvedeni;
Feed containing or produced from ACS-BNØØ8-2 oilseed rape.
krma, ki vsebuje oljno ogrščico ACS-BNØØ8-2 ali je iz nje proizvedena;
Products other than food and feed containing ACS-BNØØ8-2 oilseed rape for the same uses as any other oilseed rape with the exception of cultivation.
proizvodi, ki niso živila in krma ter vsebujejo oljno ogrščico ACS-BNØØ8-2 za enako uporabo kot katera koli druga oljna ogrščica, razen za gojenje.
The genetically modified ACS-BNØØ8-2 oilseed rape, as described in the application, expresses the PAT protein which confers tolerance to the glufosinate-ammonium herbicide.
Gensko spremenjena oljna ogrščica ACS-BNØØ8-2, kakor je opisana v vlogi, izloča beljakovino PAT, zaradi katere je odporna na herbicid glufosinat-amonij.
For the purposes of the specific labelling requirements laid down in Articles 13(1) and 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘oilseed rape’.
Za namene zahtev za posebno označevanje iz členov 13(1) in 25(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 ter člena 4(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1830/2003, je „ime organizma“„oljna ogrščica“.
The words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in documents accompanying products containing ACS-BNØØ8-2 oilseed rape referred to in Article 2(2)(b) and (c) of this Decision.
Besede „ni za gojenje“ se navedejo na oznakah proizvodov iz člena 2.2(b) in (c) te odločbe, ki vsebujejo oljno ogrščico ACS-BNØØ8-2, in v dokumentih, priloženih k tem proizvodom.
Event specific real-time PCR-based method for the quantification of ACS-BNØØ8-2 oilseed rape.
za pojav specifična metoda, ki temelji na polimerazni verižni reakciji (PCR) v realnem času za kvantifikacijo oljne ogrščice ACS-BNØØ8-2,
Validated on seeds by the Community reference laboratory established under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, published at http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/statusofdoss.htm
na podlagi semen jo je potrdil referenčni laboratorij Skupnosti, ustanovljen z Uredbo (ES) št. 1829/2003, objavljena pa je na spletni strani http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/statusofdoss.htm
Reference Material: AOCS 0208-A accessible via the American Oil Chemists Society at http://www.aocs.org/tech/crm/bayer_canola.cfm
referenčni material: AOCS 0208-A na voljo pri American Oil Chemists Society (AOCS) na spletni strani http://www.aocs.org/tech/crm/bayer_canola.cfm
Biosafety Clearing-House, Record ID: see (to be completed when notified)
Urad za izmenjavo informacij o biološki varnosti, številka vpisa: glej (izpolniti po obvestilu)
Monitoring plan for environmental effects conforming with Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC
Načrt spremljanja vplivov na okolje v skladu s Prilogo VII k Direktivi 2001/18/ES
(Link: plan published on the Internet)
(Povezava: načrt je objavljen na spletu)
Note: links to relevant documents may need to be modified over time.
Opomba: Povezave do ustreznih dokumentov bo morda treba sčasoma spremeniti.
http://registerofquestions.efsa.europa.eu/roqFrontend/questionLoader?question = EFSA-Q-2005-278
http://registerofquestions.efsa.europa.eu/roqFrontend/questionLoader?question=EFSA-Q-2005-278
on State aid C 60/07 granted by Italy to Fluorite di Silius SpA
o državni pomoči C 60/07 Italije za Fluorite di Silius s.p.a.
(notified under document number C(2008) 7805)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 7805)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [1], and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi členi [1], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
On 11 December 2007 the Commission informed Italy that it had decided to initiate the formal investigation procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of aid granted to Fluorite di Silius SpA.
Komisija je 11. decembra 2007 sporočila Italiji, da bo sprožila formalni postopek preiskave v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES v zvezi s pomočjo, ki je bila odobrena družbi Fluorite di Silius s.p.a.
The Commission’s Decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
Odločitev Komisije, da sproži postopek, je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
The Commission asked interested parties to submit their comments.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane stranke, naj predložijo svoje pripombe.
On 17 January 2008 the Commission received observations from Italy on the opening of the formal investigation.
Komisija je 17. januarja 2008 prejela pripombe Italije o sprožitvi formalne preiskave.
On 20 February 2008 the Commission forwarded the opening decision to the three companies which had commented on the initiation of a formal investigation in the related case C 16/06 Nuova Mineraria Silius [3].
Komisija je 20. februarja 2008 posredovala uvodno odločbo trem družbam, ki so predložile pripombe o sprožitvi formalne preiskave v povezanem primeru C 16/06 Nuova Mineraria Silius [3].
On 18 March 2008, a meeting was held between the Commission and the Italian authorities.
Komisija in italijanski organi so se srečali 18. marca 2008.
On 15 May 2008, Italy was sent a request for information; Italy replied in a letter recorded as incoming mail on 10 June 2008.
Italija je 15. maja 2008 prejela zahtevo po informacijah, na katero je odgovorila v dopisu, ki je bil evidentiran 10. junija 2008.
On 8 February 2007 the Commission received a complaint alleging that the Region of Sardinia was planning: (i) to issue an invitation to tender for a mining concession in respect of the Genna Tres Montis mine, which had been given up by Nuova Mineraria Silius on 25 July 2006; (ii) to set up a new company, Fluorite di Silius SpA, which would take part in the tender; and (iii) to transfer all the former employees of Nuova Mineraria Silius to Fluorite di Silius.
Komisija je 8. februarja 2007 prejela pritožbo, v skladu s katero regija Sardinija domnevno namerava: (i) objaviti javni razpis za dodelitev rudarske koncesije za rudnik Genna Tres Montis, ki jo je družba Nuova Mineraria Silius 25. julija 2006 opustila; (ii) ustanoviti novo družbo Fluorite di Silius s.p.a., ki bi se prijavila na ta razpis; in (iii) prenesti vse nekdanje zaposlene iz družbe Nuova Mineraria Silius v družbo Fluorite di Silius.
In June 2006 the Region of Sardinia drew up a business plan (Programma di intervento e gestione) for the continuation of mining at Genna Tres Montis.
Regija Sardinija je junija 2006 pripravila poslovni načrt (Programma di intervento e gestione) za nadaljnje rudarjenje v rudniku Genna Tres Montis.
In September 2006 a feasibility study was carried out by Banca CIS, which concluded that the plan was economically viable.
Kreditna institucija Banca CIS je septembra 2006 izvedla študijo izvedljivosti, na podlagi katere je ugotovila, da je načrt ekonomsko upravičen.
On the basis of this study, the Region decided on 4 October 2006 to set up a company which would bid for the mining concession in the tendering procedure [4].
Na podlagi te študije se je regija Sardinija 4. oktobra 2006 odločila ustanoviti družbo, ki bi se prijavila na razpis za dodelitev rudarske koncesije [4].
Fluorite di Silius was set up thereafter; it was wholly owned by the Region of Sardinia.
Temu je sledila ustanovitev družbe Fluorite di Silius, ki je bila v celoti v lasti regije Sardinije.
The core business of the new company, like the core business of Nuova Mineraria Silius, was the production and marketing of fluorite [5] and galena [6].
Glavni poslovni dejavnosti nove družbe sta bili enaki kot glavni poslovni dejavnosti družbe Nuova Mineraria Silius, tj. proizvodnja in trženje fluorita [5] in galenita [6].
The business plan for Fluorite di Silius was based on the extraction of some 2,23 million tonnes of ore, which according to current estimates would exhaust the existing reserves of the mine [7].
Poslovni načrt za družbo Fluorite di Silius je temeljil na pridobivanju približno 2,23 milijona ton rude, s čimer bi se v skladu s trenutnimi ocenami izčrpale obstoječe rezerve rudnika [7].
As had been the case with Nuova Mineraria Silius, most of the output would be sold to Fluorsid SpA, a supplier of hydrofluoric acid, in which the Region of Sardinia had a 40 % holding.
Tako kot v primeru družbe Nuova Mineraria Silius bi bila večina rude prodana družbi Fluorsid s.p.a., dobavitelju fluorovodikove kisline, ki je v 40-odstotni lasti regije Sardinije.
The Commission decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the Treaty in respect of the abovementioned measures on three grounds.
Komisija se je ob upoštevanju navedenih ukrepov odločila sprožiti postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe iz treh razlogov.
Firstly, the call for tenders made it a condition that all the workers employed by Nuova Mineraria Silius before it was put into liquidation, including staff covered by the laid-off workers′ mobility scheme, were to be hired for at least five years, and their ranking and wages maintained.
Prvič, pogoj javnega razpisa je bil, da se vsi delavci, ki so bili zaposleni v družbi Nuova Mineraria Silius pred njeno likvidacijo, vključno z osebjem, vključenim v program mobilnosti za odpuščene delavce, zaposlijo vsaj za pet let ter da se ohranijo njihovi položaji in njihove plače.
The Commission takes the view that tenders that include non-market conditions of that kind do not comply with the market economy investor test.
Komisija meni, da javni razpisi, ki vključujejo takšne netržne pogoje, niso v skladu z načelom vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu.