natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Although it seems that two major Norwegian producers of the product concerned have indeed decided to terminate their production of the product concerned, the investigation also revealed that other producers of both LRT and salmon planned to stop the salmon production and concentrate on the production of LRT.
Čeprav izgleda, da sta se dva največja norveška proizvajalca zadevnega proizvoda dejansko odločila ustaviti proizvodnjo zadevnega proizvoda, je bilo s preiskavo ugotovljeno, da tudi drugi proizvajalci velike amerikanke in lososa načrtujejo ustavitev proizvodnje lososa, da bi se osredotočili na proizvodnjo velike amerikanke.
Production licences issued by the Norwegian government are covering both the product concerned by this review (LRT) and salmon and limit the production volume of these two products.
Dovoljenja za proizvodnjo, ki jih izdaja norveška vlada, zajemajo proizvod, ki ga zadeva ta pregled (velika amerikanka), in lososa, ter določajo zgornje meje obsega proizvodnje teh dveh proizvodov.
Although no new licences are expected to be issued before 2009, individual producers may decide to shift within the same licence from the production of salmon to the production of LRT (and vice versa).
Čeprav nova dovoljena predvidoma ne bodo izdana pred letom 2009, se lahko posamezni proizvajalci odločijo, da v okviru enega in istega dovoljenja proizvodnjo lososa preusmerijo v proizvodnjo velike amerikanke (in obratno).
However, given the relative production volume between salmon and LRT (on average around 90 % within one licence is used for the salmon production while only 10 % for the production of LRT) the impact of a shift from salmon to LRT would be far more significant than the other way round.
Vendar bi bil zaradi razmerja med obsegom proizvodnje lososa in velike amerikanke (v povprečju predstavlja proizvodnja lososa 90 % dovoljenega obsega proizvodnje v okviru enega dovoljenja, proizvodnja velike amerikanke pa samo 10 %) vpliv preusmeritve z lososa na veliko amerikanko veliko večji kot vpliv preusmeritve v obratni smeri.
The Norwegian interested parties claimed that major producers of LRT were switching increasingly to the production of salmon because of the biological differences between LRT and salmon (e.g. harvesting frequency, shorter period for releasing trout smolt), which would make the production of salmon more efficient and therefore more lucrative.
Norveške zainteresirane stranke so trdile, da največji norveški proizvajalci velike amerikanke čedalje bolj preusmerjajo svojo proizvodnjo v proizvodnjo lososa, in sicer zaradi bioloških razlik med veliko amerikanko in lososom (npr. pogostejša letina, krajše obdobje za izpustitev dveletnih postrvi), kar naj bi povečalo učinkovitost proizvodnje lososa in s tem njeno donosnost.
Besides the fact that this argument was not supported by any evidence, it was also not taking into account that LRT has been successfully produced in Norway over many years, while the same biological differences between salmon and LRT have always existed.
Poleg tega, da te trditve niso bile podprte z dokazi, tudi niso upoštevale dejstva, da se velika amerikanka na Norveškem uspešno proizvaja že vrsto let, biološke razlike med lososom in veliko amerikanko pa so vedno obstajale.
It was not explained which exact circumstances had changed which made a change in production strategies now more likely than in the past.
Zainteresirane stranke niso pojasnile, zaradi katerih spremenjenih okoliščin naj bi bile sedaj spremembe v strategijah proizvodnje verjetnejše kot v preteklosti.
It also contradicted the expectations of the Norwegian producers of LRT that consumption would increase worldwide (see recital 63 below).
Poleg tega je bila trditev v nasprotju s pričakovanji norveških proizvajalcev velike amerikanke, da se bo potrošnja na svetovnem trgu povečala (glej uvodno izjavo (63)).
Furthermore, publicly available statistics show that the number of smolts for the production of the product concerned released in 2008 increased significantly, i.e. by at least 20 % in comparison to 2007.
Poleg tega je iz javno dostopnih statistik razvidno, da se je število dveletnih amerikank za proizvodnjo zadevnega proizvoda v letu 2008 znatno povečalo, tj. za najmanj 20 % v primerjavi z letom 2007.
An increasing trend in production is also illustrated by other statistics (SSB — Statistics Norway) which show a significant increase in production (+ 42 %) and sales (+ 53 %) of LRT juveniles over the period 2003-2006.
Naraščajoč trend v proizvodnji je razviden tudi iz drugih statistik (SSB – Statistics Norway), ki kažejo na znatno povečanje proizvodnje (+ 42 %) in prodaje (+ 53 %) mlade velike amerikanke v obdobju 2003–2006.
Finally, the evidence submitted by the Norwegian interested parties in support of their arguments, i.e. that there was a decrease in the biomass level and roe production indicating lower outputs in the future, was incomplete and based on many assumptions.
Nenazadnje so bili dokazi, ki so jih predložile norveške zainteresirane stranke v podporo svojim trditvam, tj. da se je raven biomase znižala in je na podlagi proizvodnje iker možno sklepati o zmanjšanju proizvodnje v prihodnosti, nepopolni in so temeljili na številnih domnevah.
It was therefore not considered as conclusive.
Zato se niso šteli za odločilne.
On the basis of the above, the argument of the Norwegian interested parties that production volumes in Norway will decrease overall therefore had to be rejected.
Glede na zgornje navedbe je bilo treba trditve norveških zainteresiranih strank o zmanjšanju celotnega obsega proizvodnje na Norveškem zavrniti.
The CI claimed that the production in Norway is expected to increase even further following the likely issuance of new production licences in 2009.
IS je trdila, da se bo proizvodnja na Norveškem po predvideni izdaji novih dovoljenj za proizvodnjo v letu 2009 verjetno še bolj povečala.
As mentioned above in recital 54, it is not expected that any new licences will be issued before 2009.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (54), nova dovoljenja predvidoma ne bodo izdana pred letom 2009.
In this respect, it was considered that even if new licences were to be issued in 2009, the additional number of licences and thus additional production volume is yet unknown.
V zvezi s tem se je štelo, da je izdaja novih dovoljenj v letu 2009 sicer možna, vendar pa njihovo število in zato tudi obseg dodatne proizvodnje sedaj še nista znana.
Furthermore, licences cover both the production of salmon and the production of trout and at this stage it is not possible to forecast with sufficient degree of certainty how much of each licence will be used either for salmon or for trout.
Poleg tega dovoljenja veljajo hkrati za proizvodnjo lososa in proizvodnjo postrvi, zaradi česar na tej stopnji ni možno dovolj zanesljivo predvideti, kolikšen del vsakega posameznega novega dovoljenja se bo uporabljal za proizvodnjo lososa in kolikšen del za proizvodnjo postrvi.
Finally, it should be noted that even if new licences were to be issued, and given the relatively long production cycles, this does not translate immediately in an increase of production.
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da se proizvodnja tudi v primeru izdaje novih dovoljenj zaradi sorazmerno dolgega proizvodnega cikla ne bo takoj povečala.
The Norwegian Seafood Federation and Association contested that production volume of trout would have increased or would increase further in future claiming that the total biomass and the number of fish in April 2008 was significantly lower when compared to April 2007.
Norveška zveza in združenje za ribe in morske sadeže (The Norwegian Seafood Federation and Association) sta nasprotovala trditvi, da se je obseg proizvodnje postrvi povečal in da se bo v prihodnosti še naprej povečeval ter trdila, da sta celotna biomasa in število rib aprila 2008 bila znatno nižja v primerjavi z aprilom 2007.
These allegations could however not be verified and had to be rejected.
Vendar teh trditev ni bilo možno preveriti in jih je zato bilo treba zavrniti.
On the basis of the above, it is concluded that production volumes of LRT in Norway are likely to increase in the foreseeable future.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega se šteje, da se bo obseg proizvodnje velike amerikanke na Norveškem v predvidljivi prihodnosti verjetno povečal.
Evolution of the Community consumption
Gibanje potrošnje Skupnosti
It is noted that this investigation was limited to dumping and therefore precise data on the Community industry’s production and sales of LRT on the Community market during the RIP were not available.
Treba je opozoriti, da je bila preiskava omejena na damping in da zato natančnih podatkov o proizvodnji industrije Skupnosti in prodaji velike amerikanke na trgu Skupnosti v OPP ni bilo na voljo.
However, several sources confirmed that worldwide demand for fish products including LRT is expected to increase by 5 % on a yearly basis in the future.
Vendar so različni viri potrdili, da se pričakuje 5-odstotno letno povečanje povpraševanja po proizvodih iz rib, vključno z veliko amerikanko, na svetovnem trgu.
This expanding trend is also likely to be observed in the Community even though demand in the Community is not expected to absorb the entirety of the additional LRT volumes produced in Norway.
Ta naraščajoč trend se lahko pričakuje tudi za Skupnost, čeprav povečano povpraševanje predvidoma ne bo v celoti absorbiralo dodatnega obsega proizvodnje velike amerikanke na Norveškem.
Subsequent to disclosure, the Finnish Fish Farmers’ Association (‘FFFA’) objected to the above conclusion stating that, even if worldwide fish demand is expected to increase, there would be no additional demand for Norwegian LRT in the Community.
Po razkritju je Finsko združenje ribogojcev (Finnish Fish Farmers’ Association – „FFFA“) nasprotovalo zgornji sklepni ugotovitvi in trdilo, da se kljub pričakovanemu povečanju povpraševanja po ribah na svetovnem trgu povpraševanje po norveških velikih amerikankah v Skupnosti ne bo povečalo.
FFFA further claimed that any additional demand would be directed to new and exotic fish species rather than trout.
FFFA je nadalje trdil, da bo dodatno povpraševanje povezano z novimi, eksotičnimi ribjimi vrstami in ne s postrvjo.
It should be noted that as mentioned in recital 63 above, several sources indicated an increase in consumption of LRT, which was also confirmed by other interested parties representing farmers located in several Member States but also in Norway.
Opozoriti je treba, da so, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (63), nekateri viri navedli povečanje potrošnje velike amerikanke, ki so ga potrdile tudi druge zainteresirane stranke, ki zastopajo ribogojce nekaterih držav članic in tudi Norveške.
As FFFA did not submit any information or evidence which could substantiate its allegations, they had to be rejected.
Ker FFFA ni predložil informacij ali dokazov, ki bi potrdili njegove trditve, je te bilo treba zavrniti.
Evolution of export prices and volumes to third country markets
Gibanje cen in obsega izvoza na trge tretjih držav
The investigation showed that Norway’s main export markets are Russia and to a lesser extent Japan, where, in total, about 57 % of the Norwegian exports of LRT were destined, while only 13 % of Norwegian exports were destined to the Community market in 2007.
S preiskavo je bilo ugotovljeno, da sta glavna izvozna trga Norveške Rusija in v manjši meri Japonska, kamor je bilo v letu 2007 v celoti odpravljenega 57 % norveškega izvoza velike amerikanke, na trg Skupnosti pa samo 13 %.
Around 14 % of total Norwegian exports of LRT were also destined to Ukraine and Taiwan in the same year.
Približno 14 % celotnega norveškega izvoza velike amerikanke je bilo v istem letu odpravljenega tudi v Ukrajino in na Tajvan.
Norwegian exports on the world market are in competition with Chilean exports; Chile being the biggest global player, its production and export volumes exceed those of Norway.
Norveškemu izvozu na svetovnem trgu konkurira čilski izvoz; Čile je največji svetovni proizvajalec izvoznik zadevnega proizvoda, obseg njegove proizvodnje in izvoza presegata obseg proizvodnje in izvoza Norveške.
However, following increasing demand, Norwegian exports to Russia but also to Ukraine have increased significantly during the past years; i.e. from 8600 tonnes in 2002 to 31500 tonnes in total in 2007.
Vendar pa se je zaradi povečanega povpraševanja norveški izvoz v Rusijo in tudi v Ukrajino v zadnjih letih znatno povečal, tj. z 8600 ton v letu 2002 na skupaj 31500 ton v letu 2007.
This trend is confirmed by recent statistics, which show that significant additional volumes of Chilean and Norwegian LRT are exported to Russia.
Ta trend potrjujejo najnovejše statistike, ki kažejo, da se v Rusijo izvaža znatno povečan obseg čilske in norveške velike amerikanke.
As stated in recital 65, the investigation showed that Russia has become the main export market for Norwegian producers.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (65), je bilo s preiskavo ugotovljeno, da je Rusija postala glavni izvozni trg norveških proizvajalcev.
On top of the significant export volume increase to Russia, a switch from sales of frozen trout to fresh trout could also be observed in 2007.
Poleg znatnega povečanja obsega izvoza v Rusijo je bilo v letu 2007 možno opaziti tudi preusmeritev z zamrznjene postrvi k sveži postrvi.
This switch shows the will by Norwegian producers to satisfy the needs of their Russian customers who prefer fresh products, thus indicating the strong interest of the Norwegian exporting producers in the booming Russian market.
Ta preusmeritev odraža prizadevanja norveških proizvajalcev za upoštevanje povpraševanja svojih ruskih kupcev, ki imajo raje sveže proizvode iz rib, in torej močan interes norveških proizvajalcev izvoznikov za hitro rastoč ruski trg.
Norwegian exports to Japan show a downward trend between 2006 and 2007, i.e. they decreased by 39 % from 10877 to 6661 tonnes.
V zvezi z norveškim izvozom na Japonsko je bil za obdobje med letoma 2006 in 2007 ugotovljen nazadujoč trend, tj. izvoz se je zmanjšal za 39 %, in sicer z 10877 na 6661 ton.
As in the case of Russia, Norwegian imports are in competition with Chilean imports on the Japanese market.
Kot v primeru Rusije, norveškemu izvozu na japonskem trgu konkurira čilski izvoz.
Chile was able to increase significantly its export volumes to Japan.
Čilu je uspelo znatno povečati obseg svojega izvoza na Japonsko.
However, in order to draw more definitive conclusions a wider time-span should be looked at.
Vendar bi za sprejetje dokončnih sklepnih ugotovitev gibanje izvoza bilo treba spremljati daljše obdobje.
On the basis of the data available to the Commission services, such conclusion could however not be drawn.
Na podlagi podatkov, ki so jih imele na voljo službe Komisije, takšnih sklepnih ugotovitev ni bilo možno sprejeti.
Norwegian export prices were found to be higher to third country markets than to the Community (on average by 8,6 %) during the RIP.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so bile v OPP norveške izvozne cene višje za trge tretjih držav kot za Skupnost (v povprečju za 8,6 %).
However, statistics referring to the period after the RIP show a decreasing price trend also in Norway’s traditional export markets.
Vendar statistike v zvezi z obdobjem po OPP kažejo na nazadujoč trend cen tudi na norveških tradicionalnih izvoznih trgih.
Average export prices from Norway to Russia have fluctuated between 2006 and 2007 from NOK 34,70 per kg to NOK 24,22 per kg, which is explained to a great extent by the switch from frozen trout to fresh trout, which was less expensive, but also by the international competition.
Povprečne izvozne cene z Norveške v Rusijo so se med letoma 2006 in 2007 znižale s 34,70 NOK/kg na 24,22 NOK/kg, kar je v veliki meri možno razložiti s preusmeritvijo z zamrznjene postrvi k sveži postrvi, ki je bila cenejša, in tudi z mednarodno konkurenco.
Likewise, export prices to Japan moved from an average NOK 33,26 per kg in 2006 to NOK 29,79 per kg.
Podobno so se izvozne cene na Japonsko znižale s povprečno 33,26 NOK/kg na 29,79 NOK za kg.
Despite this decrease, export prices to the EC in 2007 were still on average 4 % below the export prices to Japan and Russia.
Kljub temu znižanju so bile izvozne cene v ES v letu 2007 še zmeraj v povprečju za 4 % nižje od izvoznih cen na Japonsko in v Rusijo.
This trend is also confirmed for the beginning of 2008.
Ta trend je bilo možno potrditi tudi za začetek leta 2008.
In a situation of global increasing demand, given the attractiveness (higher prices) of the main expanding market (Russia) and given the steady increasing demand of other markets such as Ukraine and Far East countries where exports of LRT originating in Norway have been increasing over the past years, it is likely that supplementary volumes of LRT will be mostly channelled to and absorbed by these markets.
Zaradi naraščanja svetovnega povpraševanja je zaradi privlačnosti (višje cene) glavnih rastočih trgov (Rusija) in zaradi stalnega naraščanja povpraševanja drugih trgov, kot so Ukrajina in države Daljnega Vzhoda, kjer izvoz velike amerikanke s poreklom iz Norveške zadnjih deset let narašča, se pričakuje, da bodo dodaten obseg proizvodnje velike amerikanke v glavnem uvozili in absorbirali ti trgi.
Subsequent to disclosure the CI claimed that there are high stock levels of frozen LRT in Norway which should be taken into consideration in the analysis of the likely development of export volumes into the Community.
Po razkritju je IS trdila, da so ravni zalog zamrznjene velike amerikanke na Norveškem visoke, kar je treba upoštevati pri analizi verjetnega gibanja obsega izvoza v Skupnost.
However, the CI did not submit any evidence pointing to the existence of high stock levels.
Vendar IS ni predložila dokazov, iz katerih bi bile razvidne visoke ravni zalog.
This claim was therefore considered as speculative.
Zato se je to trditev štelo za nezanesljivo.
It is also noted that verification visits took place at the premises of the largest exporting producers of LRT in Norway and that no such high stock levels could be found.
Treba je tudi opozoriti, da so bili izvedeni preveritveni obiski v prostorih največjih proizvajalcev izvoznikov velike amerikanke na Norveškem in da tako visoke ravni zalog niso bile ugotovljene.
The CI further claimed the existence of increasing Russian production of LRT and the likely introduction of additional customs duties by the Russian authorities on Norwegian LRT to protect the Russian LRT production.
IS je tudi trdila, da se je ruska proizvodnja velike amerikanke povečala in da bodo ruski organi verjetno uvedli dodatne carinske dajatve na norveško veliko amerikanko, da bi zaščitili rusko proizvodnjo velike amerikanke.
Other LRT producers claimed that Norwegian LRT producers were dependent on the Russian market and that, should market access to Russia be limited due to the unpredictability of this market, significant volumes of LRT would be directed to the Community.
Drugi proizvajalci velike amerikanke so trdili, da so norveški proizvajalci odvisni od ruskega trga in da bi bile v primeru morebitne omejitve dostopa do tega trga zaradi njegove nepredvidljivosti znatne količine velike amerikanke usmerjene v Skupnost.
Likewise, these allegations were not supported by any evidence and were considered purely speculative.
Tudi te trditve niso bile potrjene z dokazi in se jih je zaradi tega štelo za nezanesljive.
Thus, there were no reasons to assume that the currently expanding Russian market would limit access to Norwegian exports.
Zato ni bilo razlogov za sklepanje o omejitvi dostopa norveškega izvoza do ruskega trga.
It is also noted that, as mentioned above in recital 65, other third country markets such as Ukraine and the Far East are also expanding and that exports from Norway have indeed increased to these countries.
Treba je tudi opozoriti, da se, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (65), širijo tudi trgi drugih tretjih držav, kot so Ukrajina ali države Daljnega Vzhoda in da se je izvoz z Norveške v te države povečal.
The argument that Norway depends solely on exports to Russia had therefore to be rejected.
Trditev, da je Norveška odvisna samo od izvoza v Rusijo, je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
Evolution of export prices and volumes to the Community
Gibanje cen in obsega izvoza v Skupnost
Price data available on export sales to the Community have shown that between 2006 and 2007 the average export prices have moved from an average of EUR 4,02 per kg in 2006 to an average EUR 2,87 per kg in 2007.
Iz razpoložljivih podatkov o cenah izvoza v Skupnost je razvidno, da so se med letoma 2006 in 2007 povprečne izvozne cene znižale s povprečno 4,02 EUR/kg v letu 2006 na povprečno 2,87 EUR/kg v letu 2007.
However, since the last quarter of 2007 up to the beginning of 2008, statistics show that this trend stopped and that prices have stabilised.
Vendar pa je iz statistik v zvezi z obdobjem od zadnjega četrtletja leta 2007 do začetka leta 2008 razvidno, da se je ta trend ustavil in da so se cene stabilizirale.
As the above analysis shows in recital 71, in a situation of growing markets, it is unlikely that the increased production volume of LRT in Norway will be fully directed to the Community should measures be allowed to lapse.
Kot je razvidno iz zgoraj navedene analize v uvodni izjavi (71) zaradi širitve ni verjetno, da bi bil povečan obseg proizvodnje velike amerikanke na Norveškem v celoti usmerjen v Skupnost, če bi se ukrepi odpravili.
Indeed, demand is increasing worldwide and Norwegian exports are already well established in several third country markets and are expected to increase further.
Povpraševanje se vendar povečuje tudi na svetovnem trgu, norveški izvoz je že dobro uveljavljen na trgih tretjih držav in pričakuje se, da se bo še povečal.
Despite the competition with Chilean exports, and although in relative terms Norway has lost market shares to Chile in some markets, its exports to most of these countries in absolute terms have increased and are expected to increase further given the world market situation.
Kljub konkurenci s čilskim izvozom in kljub temu, da je, sorazmerno gledano, Čile od Norveške prevzel tržne deleže na nekaterih trgih, se je izvoz Norveške v večino teh držav absolutno gledano povečal in se pričakuje, da se bo glede na položaj svetovnega trga še naprej povečeval.
With regard to the Community market, as mentioned above in recital 63, consumption for LRT is likely to increase and thus the Community market will be able to absorb increased import quantities without necessarily experiencing significant price pressure.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (63), je v zvezi s trgom Skupnosti verjetno, da se bo potrošnja velike amerikanke povečala, zato bo ta trg lahko absorbiral povečano količino uvoza, ne da bi to nujno povzročilo močan cenovni pritisk.
It is also noted that the competition between Norwegian and Chilean imports is not only strong in other third country markets, but also in the Community market.
Opozarja se tudi, da konkurenca med norveškim in čilskim uvozom ni močna samo na trgih tretjih držav ampak tudi na trgu Skupnosti.
There are therefore no clear indications that import volumes from Norway into the Community will indeed increase significantly should measures be allowed to lapse.
Ni jasnih znakov za dejansko znatno povečanje obsega uvoza iz Norveške v Skupnost, če bi se ukrepi odpravili.
Given the expected increase in consumption, and the situation in the world market as described above, it cannot be concluded that there is a risk of oversupply in the Community market with consequent significant price drops.
Zaradi pričakovanega povečanja potrošnje in položaja svetovnega trga, kot je opisan zgoraj, ni možno skleniti, da obstaja tveganje presežka ponudbe na trgu Skupnosti in torej znatnega padca cen.
Therefore, it was concluded that the situation as it was during the RIP with regard to the export prices and production volume is of a lasting nature.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da je položaj v zvezi z izvoznimi cenami in obsegom proizvodnje, ugotovljen v OPP, trajen.