natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the present case, the Commission was notified of some of the measures on 29 April 2004 under the interim mechanism pursuant to Annex IV, point 3 to the Accession Treaty, when the 1999 Guidelines were in force.
V tem primeru je bila Komisija o nekaterih ukrepih obveščena 29. aprila 2004 po začasnem mehanizmu v skladu s točko 3 Priloge IV k Pristopni pogodbi, ko so veljale Smernice iz leta 1999.
However, the Guidelines also stipulate that they will apply for the assessment of any rescue or restructuring aid granted without the authorisation of the Commission (unlawful aid) if some of or all the aid is granted after 1 October 2004 (point 104, first subparagraph).
Vendar pa Smernice tudi določajo, da se Smernice uporabljajo pri ocenjevanju vseh pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje, odobrenih brez dovoljenja Komisije (nezakonita pomoč), če je bil del ali celoten obseg pomoči odobren po 1. oktobru 2004 (točka 104, prvi pododstavek).
ISD Polska lists Gdańsk Shipyard’s existing contracts for steel structures, including one contract for oil-storage facilities for about 5000 tons per annum in 2008 and 2009.
ISD Polska navaja obstoječe pogodbe ladjedelnice Gdańsk za jeklene strukture, vključno s pogodbo za zmogljivosti za skladiščenje približno 5000 ton nafte na leto za leti 2008 in 2009.
Under the plan, output of this particular product would be 16000 tons by 2010, rising to 36000 tons in 2012.
Po tem načrtu bi bila proizvodnja tega proizvoda 16000 ton do leta 2010 in 36000 ton leta 2012.
The merged yards expect to receive new guarantees by end-2008.
Združeni ladjedelnici pričakujeta, da bosta do konca leta 2008 prejeli nova jamstva.
In following years too, at least until the end of the restructuring period in 2012, Export Credit Insurance Corporation guarantees should cover the shipbuilding process virtually in full.
Tudi v naslednjih letih, najmanj do konca obdobja prestrukturiranja leta 2012, naj bi izvozno-kreditna agencija z jamstvi skoraj v celoti krila ladjedelniške dejavnosti.
In addition, the Commission has to take into account the whole restructuring period, starting from 2002.
Poleg tega mora Komisija upoštevati celotno obdobje prestrukturiranja z začetkom leta 2002.
Considering the substantial State aid which the yard has benefited from in this period, the own contribution as a percentage of restructuring costs is even lower.
Ob upoštevanju obsežne državne pomoči, ki jo je ladjedelnica prejela v tem času, je lastni prispevek, izražen kot odstotni delež stroškov za prestrukturiranje, še nižji.
Considering the substantial State aid which the yard has benefited from in this period, the own contribution as a percentage of total restructuring costs is even lower.
Ob upoštevanju obsežne državne pomoči, ki jo je ladjedelnica prejela v tem času, je lastni prispevek, izražen kot odstotni delež vseh stroškov za prestrukturiranje, še nižji.
Situation as at 31 March 2007.
Stanje na dan 31. marca 2007.
See also Commission decision of 18 July 2007 in case N 105/07, Guarantee scheme for export contracts, summary notice in OJ C 214, 13.9.2007.
Glej tudi Odločbo Komisije z dne 18. julija 2007 v zadevi N 105/07, Jamstvena shema za izvozne pogodbe, povzetek v UL C 214, 13.9.2007.
By this decision the Commission approved as free of State aid the guarantee scheme run by the Export Credit Insurance Corporation for companies not in financial difficulty.
S to odločbo je Komisija jamstveno shemo, ki jo izvozno-kreditna agencija uporablja za podjetja, ki niso v finančnih težavah, označila kot jamstveno shemo brez državne pomoči.
The plan then envisages a portfolio comprising off-shore vessels and large C6600 car carriers.
Načrt je nato predvideval portfelj, ki zajema plovila za plovbo na odprtem morju in velike ladje za prevoz avtomobilov C6600.
Under the joint restructuring plan, after June the merged yards were to conclude contracts for 13 vessels in 2008 (3 container vessels, 5 off-shore vessels and 5 car carriers), 16 vessels in 2009 (2 container vessels, 8 off-shore vessels and 6 car carriers), 15 vessels in 2010 and 2011 (1 container vessel, 7 off-shore vessels and 7 car carriers), 17 vessels in 2012 (10 off-shore vessels and 7 car carriers) and 18 vessels in 2013 and 2014 (14 off-shore vessels and 4 car carriers).
Po skupnem načrtu za prestrukturiranje naj bi po juniju združeni ladjedelnici leta 2008 sklenili pogodbe za 13 plovil (3 kontejnerske ladje, 5 plovil za plovbo na odprtem morju in 5 ladij za prevod avtomobilov), leta 2009 za 16 plovil (2 kontejnerski ladji, 8 plovil za plovbo na odprtem morju in 6 ladij za prevoz avtomobilov), leta 2010 in 2011 za 15 plovil (1 kontejnerska ladja, 7 plovil za plovbo po odprtem morju in 7 ladij za prevoz avtomobilov), leta 2012 za 17 plovil (10 plovil za plovbo na odprtem morju in 7 ladij za prevoz avtomobilov) ter leta 2013 in 2014 za 18 plovil (14 plovil za plovbo na odprtem morju in 4 ladje za prevoz avtomobilov).
Various submissions by Poland on the operation of the Export Credit Insurance Corporation guarantee system [49] indicate that these guarantees were granted to Gdynia Shipyard in the following way. First, a contract was signed with the shipowner, which was typically conditional on the yard proving within a certain period of time that financing of production would be guaranteed by the Export Credit Insurance Corporation.
Različne trditve Poljske glede delovanja sistema jamstev [49] izvozno-kreditne agencije nakazujejo, da so bila ta jamstva ladjedelnici Gdynia dodeljena na naslednji način: najprej je bila podpisana pogodba z lastnikom ladje; pogodba je bila običajno pogojena s tem, da je morala ladjedelnica v določenem času dokazati, da bo za financiranje proizvodnje jamčila izvozno-kreditna agencija.
In its decision to open the formal investigation, the Commission concluded, on the basis of the information provided by Poland, that a series of measures of which it had been notified on 29 April 2004 actually constituted new aid, either unlawful or notified, because it was granted after 1 May 2004, the date of Poland’s accession to the EU. The comments provided by Poland and third parties after the investigation was opened did not lead the Commission to alter its conclusion.
V svoji odločitvi o sprožitvi formalne preiskave je Komisija na podlagi informacij, ki jih je posredovala Poljska, sklenila, da je vrsta ukrepov, o katerih je bila obveščena 29. aprila 2004, dejansko pomenila novo pomoč, nezakonito ali priglašeno, saj so bili ti ukrepi dodeljeni po 1. maju 2004, tj. po datumu pristopa Poljske k EU.
This nominal value is set out in Table 1 below. (212) The loans benefiting from the Treasury guarantees listed in Table 1 were granted at an interest rate equal to LIBOR 1M + 100 basis points, whereas the risk of default when the guarantees were issued was estimated by the Polish authorities at 60-70 %.
Posojila z jamstvi finančnega ministrstva iz razpredelnice 1 so bila dodeljena z obrestno mero LIBOR 1M + 100 bazičnih točk, tveganje neplačila v času izdaje jamstev pa so poljski organi ocenili na 60–70 %.
Virtually all shipbuilding from 1 May 2004 was financed thanks to these guarantees. In total, between 1 May 2004 and 12 June 2008 Gdynia Shipyard received 108 guarantees for a total value of PLN 3095529638 for vessels built at Gdynia (not at Gdańsk Shipyard, which was previously a subsidiary of Gdynia Shipyard) [48].
Skupaj je ladjedelnica Gdynia med 1. majem 2004 in 12. junijem 2008 prejela 108 jamstev v skupni vrednosti PLN 3095529638 PLN za plovila, izdelana v ladjedelnici Gdynia (ne v ladjedelnici Gdańsk, ki je bila prej hčerinska družba ladjedelnice Gdynia [48].
Table 1 State aid granted to Gdynia Shipyard between 1 May 2004 and 30 June 2007, according to the information provided by the Polish authorities
Državna pomoč, dodeljena ladjedelnici Gdynia med 1. majem 2004 in 30. junijem 2007, v skladu z informacijami, ki so jih posredovali poljski organi
Treasury Guarantee — vessel No 8276/1
Jamstvo – plovilo št. 8276/1
determining the first regions for the start of operations of the Visa Information System (VIS)
o določitvi prvih regij za začetek delovanja vizumskega informacijskega sistema (VIS)
(notified under document C(2009) 8542)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 8542)
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 concerning the Visa Information System (VIS) and the exchange of data between Member States on short-stay visas (VIS Regulation) [1], and in particular Article 48(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 767/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. julija 2008 o vizumskem informacijskem sistemu (VIS) in izmenjavi podatkov med državami članicami o vizumih za kratkoročno prebivanje (Uredba VIS) [1] ter zlasti člena 48(4) Uredbe,
Article 48 of Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 provides for a progressive implementation of the VIS operations.
Člen 48 Uredbe (ES) št. 767/2008 določa postopno uvajanje sistema VIS.
Accordingly, it is necessary to determine the first regions where the data to be processed in the VIS, including photographs and fingerprint data, shall be collected and transmitted to the VIS for all visa applications in the region concerned, during the first phases of the progressive implementation.
Zato je treba določiti prve regije, v katerih se bodo v prvih fazah postopnega uvajanja podatki, obdelani v sistemu VIS, vključno s fotografijami in prstnimi odtisi, zbirali in pošiljali v sistem VIS za vse vloge za izdajo vizumov v zadevni regiji.
Article 48(4) of Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 provides for the determination of these regions based on the following criteria: the risk of illegal immigration, threats to the internal security of the Member States and the feasibility of collecting biometrics from all locations in this region.
V členu 48(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 767/2008 je navedeno, da se te regije določijo na podlagi naslednjih meril: tveganja nezakonitega priseljevanja, grožnje nacionalni varnosti držav članic in izvedljivost zbiranja biometričnih podatkov z vseh lokacij te regije.
The Commission has made an assessment for the different regions as defined in 2005 by the Member States’ experts for the progressive implementation of the VIS, and taking into account, notably for the first criterion, elements such as the average visa refusal and entry refusal rates for each of the regions concerned, and, for the third criterion, the fact that consular presence or representation should be increased in certain regions in order to efficiently implement the VIS in these regions.
Komisija je opravila oceno za različne regije, ki so jih leta 2005 določili strokovnjaki držav članic za postopno uvajanje sistema VIS, pri čemer je zlasti pri prvem merilu upoštevala elemente, kot so povprečne stopnje zavrnitve izdaje vizuma in vstopa za posamezne zadevne regije, ter pri tretjem dejstvo, da je treba v nekaterih regijah okrepiti konzularna predstavništva, da bi se sistem VIS v teh regijah učinkovito uvedel.
According to this assessment, the first region where the collection and transmission of visa data to the VIS should start for all visa applications should be North Africa.
Na podlagi te ocene naj bi bila prva regija, v kateri bi se začelo zbiranje podatkov in njihovo pošiljanje v sistem VIS za vse vloge za izdajo vizumov, severna Afrika.
The second region where the collection and transmission of visa data to the VIS should start for all visa applications should be the Near East, with the exception of the occupied Palestinian territory due to the serious technical difficulties that might be encountered in the equipping of the consular posts or offices concerned.
Druga regija, v kateri bi se začelo zbiranje podatkov in njihovo pošiljanje v sistem VIS za vse vloge za izdajo vizumov, naj bi bil Bližnji vzhod, razen zasedenega palestinskega ozemlja zaradi resnih tehničnih težav, do katerih bi lahko prišlo pri opremljanju zadevnih konzularnih predstavništev ali uradov.
At a later stage a decision should be adopted concerning the start of operations of the VIS in this territory.
Na poznejši stopnji naj bi bila sprejeta odločitev glede začetka delovanja sistema VIS na tem ozemlju.
The third region where the collection and transmission of visa data to the VIS should start for all visa applications should be the Gulf Region.
Tretja regija, v kateri naj bi se začelo zbiranje podatkov in njihovo pošiljanje v sistem VIS za vse vloge za izdajo vizumov, naj bi bila zalivska regija.
To avoid a gap when fighting illegal immigration and protecting internal security, the Schengen border crossing points should be designated as a separate region for the roll-out in order to cover the visa applications lodged at the external borders.
Da se prepreči vrzel med bojem proti nezakonitemu priseljevanju in zaščito notranje varnosti, bi morali biti schengenski mejni prehodi v fazi zagona ločena regija, tako da bi bile zajete tudi vloge za izdajo vizumov, vložene na zunanjih mejah.
Member States should endeavour to start collecting and transmitting the data to the VIS at the external border crossing points as soon as possible in order to avoid that the roll-out in the regions is circumvented by third country nationals of these regions, lodging their applications at the external borders.
Države članice bi si morale prizadevati, da se začnejo podatki na zunanjih mejnih prehodih zbirati in pošiljati v sistem VIS čim prej, da se prepreči, da bi se državljani tretjih držav iz teh regij izognili vnosu podatkov v sistem VIS z vložitvijo vloge na zunanji meji.
The starting date of the operations in each of these regions is to be determined by the Commission pursuant to Article 48(1) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 767/2008.
Začetek delovanja sistema VIS v teh regijah določi Komisija v skladu s členom 48(1) in (3) Uredbe (ES) št. 767/2008.
For the determination of the further regions, subsequent decisions should be taken at a later stage on the basis of an additional and up-dated assessment of these other regions in accordance with the relevant criteria and the experience with the implementation in the first regions defined by this Decision.
Odločitev o določitvi nadaljnjih regij se sprejme na poznejši stopnji na podlagi dodatne in posodobljene ocene teh regij v skladu z ustreznimi merili in izkušnjami pri izvajanju v prvih regijah, določenih v tej odločbi.
In accordance with Article 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark did not take part in the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 and is not bound by it nor subject to its application.
V skladu s členom 2 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priloga k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, Danska ni sodelovala pri sprejetju Uredbe (ES) št. 767/2008, ki zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja.
This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [2].
Ta odločba pomeni razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, v katerem Združeno kraljestvo ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/365/ES z dne 29. maja 2000 o prošnji Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [2].
This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland’s request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [3].
Ta odločba pomeni razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, v katerem Irska ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2002/192/ES z dne 28. februarja 2002 o prošnji Irske, da sodeluje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [3].
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters’ association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [4], which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point B of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of that Agreement [5].
Kar zadeva Islandijo in Norveško, ta odločba pomeni razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško o pridružitvi obeh k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [4], ki sodijo v področje iz točke B člena 1 Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES z dne 17. maja 1999 o nekaterih izvedbenih predpisih za uporabo navedenega sporazuma [5].
As regards Switzerland, this Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [6], which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point B of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of the Council Decisions 2008/146/EC [7] and 2008/149/JHA [8].
Kar zadeva Švico, ta odločba pomeni razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [6], ki sodijo v področje iz točke B člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES v povezavi s členom 3 sklepov Sveta 2008/146/ES [7] in 2008/149/PNZ [8].
As regards Liechtenstein, this Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement signed between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the association of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point B of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of the Council Decisions 2008/261/EC [9] and 2008/262/EC [10].
Kar zadeva Lihtenštajn, ta odločba pomeni razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda, ki sodijo v področje iz točke B člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES v povezavi s členom 3 sklepov Sveta 2008/261/ES [9] in 2008/262/ES [10].
As regards Cyprus, this Decision constitutes provisions building on the Schengen acquis or otherwise related to it within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the 2003 Act of Accession.
Kar zadeva Ciper, ta odločba pomeni določbe, ki temeljijo na schengenskem pravnem redu ali so z njim kako drugače povezane v smislu člena 3(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2003.
As regards Bulgaria and Romania, this Decision constitutes provisions building on the Schengen acquis or otherwise related to it within the meaning of Article 4(2) of the 2005 Act of Accession.
Kar zadeva Bolgarijo in Romunijo, ta odločba pomeni določbe, ki temeljijo na schengenskem pravnem redu ali so z njim kako drugače povezane v smislu člena 4(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2005.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee set up by Article 51(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) [11],
Ukrepi, določeni v tej odločbi, so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega na podlagi člena 51(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1987/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o vzpostavitvi, delovanju in uporabi druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) [11] –
The regions where the collection and transmission of data to the Visa Information System (VIS) shall start according to Article 48(1)(c) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 are the following:
Regije, v katerih se začne zbiranje podatkov in njihovo pošiljanje v vizumski informacijski sistem (VIS) v skladu s členom 48(1)(c) in (3) Uredbe (ES) št. 767/2008, so:
The first region:
prva regija:
Algeria,
Alžirija,
Egypt,
Egipt,
Libya,
Libija,
Mauritania,
Mavretanija,
Tunisia.
Tunizija,
The second region:
druga regija:
Jordan,
Jordanija,
Syria.
Sirija,
The third region:
tretja regija:
Bahrain,
Bahrajn,
Saudi Arabia,
Saudova Arabija,
United Arab Emirates,
Združeni arabski emirati,
External border crossing points, as defined by Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) [12], constitute a separate region.
Zunanji mejni prehodi v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 562/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. marca 2006 o Zakoniku Skupnosti o pravilih, ki urejajo gibanje oseb prek meja (Zakonik o schengenskih mejah) [12] pomenijo ločeno regijo.
For visa applications lodged at the external borders, the collection and transmission of the data to the VIS shall start according to Article 48(3) of Regulation (EC) No 767/2008.Article 3
Zbiranje podatkov in njihovo pošiljanje v sistem VIS se za vloge za izdajo vizumov, vložene na zunanjih mejah, začne v skladu s členom 48(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 767/2008.Člen 3
of 25 January 2010
z dne 25. januarja 2010
amending Annex 2, Schedule A, to the Common Consular Instructions on visas for the diplomatic missions and consular posts, in relation to visa requirements for holders of diplomatic passports from Saudi Arabia
o spremembi Seznama A iz Priloge 2 k Skupnim konzularnim navodilom o vizumih za diplomatsko-konzularna predstavništva v zvezi z vizumskimi obveznostmi za imetnike diplomatskih potnih listov Saudove Arabije
Having regard to the initiative of French Republic,
ob upoštevanju pobude Francoske republike,
Annex 2, Schedule A, to the Common Consular Instructions [2] contains the list of countries whose nationals are not subject to a visa requirement in one or more Schengen States when they are holders of diplomatic, official or service passports, but who are subject to this requirement when they are holders of ordinary passports.
V Seznamu A iz Priloge 2 k Skupnim konzularnim navodilom [2] so navedene države, katerih državljani ne potrebujejo vizuma v eni ali več državah članicah schengenskega prostora, če so imetniki diplomatskega ali službenega potnega lista, vendar pa vizum potrebujejo, če so imetniki navadnega potnega lista.
France wishes to exempt holders of diplomatic passports from Saudi Arabia from the visa requirement.
Francija želi, da se imetnike diplomatskih potnih listov Saudove Arabije izvzame iz vizumske obveznosti.
This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [3]; the United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Ta sklep predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, pri katerem Združeno kraljestvo ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/365/ES z dne 29. maja 2000 o prošnji Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [3]. Združeno kraljestvo torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega akta, ki zanj ni zavezujoč in se v njem ne uporablja.