natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where the contract cannot be categorised as being one of the specified types or where its elements fall within more than one of the specified types, it should be governed by the law of the country where the party required to effect the characteristic performance of the contract has his habitual residence.
Če se pogodba ne more šteti za eno od opredeljenih vrst pogodbe oziroma če se njeni sestavni deli uvrščajo v več kot eno opredeljeno vrsto pogodbe, bi se moralo zanjo uporabljati pravo države, v kateri ima pogodbena stranka, ki je dolžna opraviti za pogodbo značilno izpolnitev, običajno prebivališče.
In the case of a contract consisting of a bundle of rights and obligations capable of being categorised as falling within more than one of the specified types of contract, the characteristic performance of the contract should be determined having regard to its centre of gravity.
Če pogodba sestoji iz skupka pravic in obveznosti, ki jih je možno uvrstiti v več kot le eno opredeljeno vrsto pogodbe, bi bilo treba značilno izpolnitev pogodbe določiti glede na njeno težišče.
Where the contract is manifestly more closely connected with a country other than that indicated in Article 4(1) or (2), an escape clause should provide that the law of that other country is to apply.
Kadar je pogodba očitno tesneje povezana z državo, na katero člen 4(1) ali (2) ne napotuje, zaščitna klavzula omogoča, da se uporabi pravo te države.
In order to determine that country, account should be taken, inter alia, of whether the contract in question has a very close relationship with another contract or contracts.
Da bi se določilo to državo, bi bilo treba med drugim upoštevati, ali je zadevna pogodba zelo tesno povezana s kakšno drugo pogodbo oziroma pogodbami.
In the absence of choice, where the applicable law cannot be determined either on the basis of the fact that the contract can be categorised as one of the specified types or as being the law of the country of habitual residence of the party required to effect the characteristic performance of the contract, the contract should be governed by the law of the country with which it is most closely connected.
Če pogodbeni stranki nista izbrali prava in prava, ki naj se uporabi, ni mogoče določiti niti z uvrstitvijo pogodbe v eno od opredeljenih vrst pogodb, niti na podlagi običajnega prebivališča pogodbene stranke, ki je dolžna opraviti za pogodbo značilno izpolnitev, bi moralo pogodbo urejati pravo države, s katero je najtesneje povezana.
As regards the interpretation of contracts for the carriage of goods, no change in substance is intended with respect to Article 4(4), third sentence, of the Rome Convention.
Glede razlage pogodb o prevozu blaga namen te uredbe ni nikakršno vsebinsko odstopanje od tretjega stavka člena 4(4) Rimske konvencije.
Consequently, single-voyage charter parties and other contracts the main purpose of which is the carriage of goods should be treated as contracts for the carriage of goods.
Zato se pogodbe o najemu vozila za en sam prevoz in druge pogodbe, katerih glavni namen je prevoz blaga, obravnavajo kot pogodbe o prevozu blaga.
For the purposes of this Regulation, the term ‘consignor’ should refer to any person who enters into a contract of carriage with the carrier and the term ‘the carrier’ should refer to the party to the contract who undertakes to carry the goods, whether or not he performs the carriage himself.
Za namene te uredbe se bi moral izraz „pošiljatelj“ nanašati na katero koli osebo, ki s prevoznikom vstopa v pogodbo o prevozu, izraz „prevoznik“ pa bi se moral nanašati na pogodbeno stranko, ki prevaža blago, če to opravlja sama ali ne.
As regards contracts concluded with parties regarded as being weaker, those parties should be protected by conflict-of-law rules that are more favourable to their interests than the general rules.
V pogodbah, pri katerih velja ena pogodbena stranka za šibkejšo, bi morala biti ta šibkejša pogodbena stranka zaščitena s kolizijskimi pravili, ki so za varstvo njenih interesov ugodnejša od splošnih pravil.
With more specific reference to consumer contracts, the conflict-of-law rule should make it possible to cut the cost of settling disputes concerning what are commonly relatively small claims and to take account of the development of distance-selling techniques.
Zlasti kar zadeva potrošniške pogodbe, bi moralo kolizijsko pravilo omogočati zmanjšanje stroškov reševanja sporov, ki so večinoma spori majhne vrednosti, in upoštevati razvoj tehnik prodaje na daljavo.
Consistency with Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 requires both that there be a reference to the concept of directed activity as a condition for applying the consumer protection rule and that the concept be interpreted harmoniously in Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 and this Regulation, bearing in mind that a joint declaration by the Council and the Commission on Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 states that ‘for Article 15(1)(c) to be applicable it is not sufficient for an undertaking to target its activities at the Member State of the consumer's residence, or at a number of Member States including that Member State; a contract must also be concluded within the framework of its activities’.
Zaradi usklajenosti z Uredbo (ES) št. 44/2001 bi moral biti po eni strani pogoj za uporabo pravila za varstvo potrošnika sklicevanje na koncept usmerjanja dejavnosti, po drugi strani pa bi bilo treba ta koncept v Uredbi (ES) št. 44/2001 in tej uredbi usklajeno razlagati, ob upoštevanju, da Skupna izjava Sveta in Komisije v zvezi s členom 15 Uredbe (ES) št. 44/2001 navaja, da za uporabo člena 15(1)(c) „ni dovolj, da podjetje usmerja svojo dejavnost v državo članico, v kateri ima potrošnik stalno prebivališče, ali v več držav, vključno s to državo članico, poleg tega mora pogodba spadati v okvir te dejavnosti“.
The declaration also states that ‘the mere fact that an Internet site is accessible is not sufficient for Article 15 to be applicable, although a factor will be that this Internet site solicits the conclusion of distance contracts and that a contract has actually been concluded at a distance, by whatever means.
Ta izjava opozarja tudi, da „samo dejstvo, da je spletna stran dostopna, ni dovolj za uporabo člena 15, saj je poleg tega potrebno še, da ta spletna stran vabi k sklepanju pogodb na daljavo in da je bila na tak ali drugačen način pogodba dejansko sklenjena na daljavo.
In this respect, the language or currency which a website uses does not constitute a relevant factor.’.
V tem pogledu jezik ali valuta, uporabljena na spletni strani, nista pomembna elementa“.
Consumers should be protected by such rules of the country of their habitual residence that cannot be derogated from by agreement, provided that the consumer contract has been concluded as a result of the professional pursuing his commercial or professional activities in that particular country.
Potrošniki bi morali biti zaščiteni s takšnimi pravili države njihovega običajnega prebivališča, od katerih ni dovoljeno odstopanje z dogovorom, pod pogojem, da je bila potrošniška pogodba sklenjena kot rezultat opravljanja gospodarskih in poklicnih dejavnosti podjetnika v tej državi.
The same protection should be guaranteed if the professional, while not pursuing his commercial or professional activities in the country where the consumer has his habitual residence, directs his activities by any means to that country or to several countries, including that country, and the contract is concluded as a result of such activities.
Enako varstvo bi moralo biti zagotovljeno, če podjetnik pri opravljanju gospodarskih ali poklicnih dejavnosti, vendar ne v državi, kjer potrošnik običajno prebiva, na kakršen koli način usmerja svoje dejavnosti v to državo ali v več držav, vključno s to državo, in je pogodba sklenjena kot rezultat teh dejavnosti.
For the purposes of this Regulation, financial services such as investment services and activities and ancillary services provided by a professional to a consumer, as referred to in sections A and B of Annex I to Directive 2004/39/EC, and contracts for the sale of units in collective investment undertakings, whether or not covered by Council Directive 85/611/EEC of 20 December 1985 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS), should be subject to Article 6 of this Regulation.
Za namene te uredbe bi moralo za finančne storitve, kot so naložbene storitve in dejavnosti ter pomožne storitve, ki jih za potrošnika opravi podjetnik, iz oddelkov A in B Priloge I k Direktivi 2004/39/ES, in za pogodbe za prodajo enot v kolektivnih naložbenih podjemih, ne glede na to, ali so zajeti v Direktivi Sveta 85/611/EGS z dne 20. decembra 1985 o usklajevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov o kolektivnih naložbenih podjemih za vlaganja v prenosljive vrednostne papirje (KNPVP), veljati člen 6 te uredbe.
Consequently, when a reference is made to terms and conditions governing the issuance or offer to the public of transferable securities or to the subscription and redemption of units in collective investment undertakings, that reference should include all aspects binding the issuer or the offeror to the consumer, but should not include those aspects involving the provision of financial services.
Kadar gre za sklicevanje na pogoje izdajanja ali ponudbe prenosljivih vrednostnih papirjev javnosti ali sklicevanje na vpis in odkup enot v kolektivnih naložbenih podjemih, bi zato morala ta sklicevanja vključevati vse vidike, ki izdajatelja ali ponudnika zavezujejo v razmerju do potrošnika, ne bi pa smela vključevati vidikov, ki se nanašajo na opravljanje finančnih storitev.
Various exceptions should be made to the general conflict-of-law rule for consumer contracts.
Za potrošniške pogodbe bi bilo treba omogočiti različne izjeme od splošnega kolizijskega pravila.
Under one such exception the general rule should not apply to contracts relating to rights in rem in immovable property or tenancies of such property unless the contract relates to the right to use immovable property on a timeshare basis within the meaning of Directive 94/47/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 1994 on the protection of purchasers in respect of certain aspects of contracts relating to the purchase of the right to use immovable properties on a timeshare basis.
V skladu z eno od takih izjem se splošno pravilo ne bi smelo uporabljati za pogodbe, katerih predmet so stvarna pravica na nepremičnini ali najemne pravice na takšni lastnini, razen za pogodbe, katerih predmet je pravica do uporabe nepremičnine na podlagi časovnega zakupa v smislu Direktive 94/47/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. oktobra 1994 o varstvu nakupov v zvezi z nekaterimi vidiki pogodb o nakupu pravice do uporabe nepremičnin na podlagi časovnega zakupa.
It is important to ensure that rights and obligations which constitute a financial instrument are not covered by the general rule applicable to consumer contracts, as that could lead to different laws being applicable to each of the instruments issued, therefore changing their nature and preventing their fungible trading and offering.
Pomembno je zagotoviti, da za pravice in obveznosti v zvezi s finančnim instrumentom ne velja splošno pravilo, ki se uporablja za potrošniške pogodbe, saj bi to lahko povzročilo, da bi se za vsak izdan instrument uporabljalo drugo pravo, s čimer bi se spremenil njegov značaj ter izničila njegova zamenljivost pri trgovanju in ponudbi.
Likewise, whenever such instruments are issued or offered, the contractual relationship established between the issuer or the offeror and the consumer should not necessarily be subject to the mandatory application of the law of the country of habitual residence of the consumer, as there is a need to ensure uniformity in the terms and conditions of an issuance or an offer.
Prav tako, kadar se izdajo ali ponudijo takšni instrumenti, za pogodbeno razmerje med izdajateljem ali ponudnikom in potrošnikom ne bi smela veljati obvezna uporaba prava države običajnega prebivališča potrošnika, saj je za izdajanje ali ponudbo treba zagotoviti enotne pogoje.
The same rationale should apply with regard to the multilateral systems covered by Article 4(1)(h), in respect of which it should be ensured that the law of the country of habitual residence of the consumer will not interfere with the rules applicable to contracts concluded within those systems or with the operator of such systems.
Enako bi moralo veljati za večstranske sisteme iz člena 4(1)(h), pri katerih bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da pravo države običajnega prebivališča potrošnika ne bi posegalo v pravila, ki se uporabljajo za pogodbe, sklenjene v okviru teh sistemov ali z upravljavcem takšnih sistemov.
For the purposes of this Regulation, references to rights and obligations constituting the terms and conditions governing the issuance, offers to the public or public take-over bids of transferable securities and references to the subscription and redemption of units in collective investment undertakings should include the terms governing, inter alia, the allocation of securities or units, rights in the event of over-subscription, withdrawal rights and similar matters in the context of the offer as well as those matters referred to in Articles 10, 11, 12 and 13, thus ensuring that all relevant contractual aspects of an offer binding the issuer or the offeror to the consumer are governed by a single law.
Za namene te uredbe bi morala sklicevanja na pravice in obveznosti, ki so sestavni del pogojev izdajanja, ponudb javnosti ali javnih prevzemnih ponudb prenosljivih vrednostnih papirjev, ter sklicevanja na vpis in odkup enot v kolektivnih naložbenih podjemih vključevati pogoje, ki med drugim urejajo razporejanje vrednostnih papirjev ali enot, pravice v primeru prekomernega vpisa, pravico do umika in podobne zadeve v okviru ponudbe, pa tudi zadeve iz členov 10, 11, 12 in 13, da bi se zagotovilo, da bo vse ustrezne pogodbene vidike ponudbe, ki izdajatelja ali ponudnika zavezujejo v odnosu do potrošnika, urejalo eno pravo.
For the purposes of this Regulation, financial instruments and transferable securities are those instruments referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2004/39/EC.
Za namene te uredbe so finančni instrumenti in prenosljivi vrednostni papirji instrumenti iz člena 4 Direktive 2004/39/ES.
Nothing in this Regulation should prejudice the operation of a formal arrangement designated as a system under Article 2(a) of Directive 98/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 1998 on settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems.
Nič v tej uredbi ne bi smelo posegati v delovanje formalnega dogovora, zasnovanega kot sistem, v skladu s členom 2(a) Direktive 98/26/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. maja 1998 o dokončnosti poravnave pri plačilih in sistemih poravnave vrednostnih papirjev.
Owing to the particular nature of contracts of carriage and insurance contracts, specific provisions should ensure an adequate level of protection of passengers and policy holders.
Glede na poseben značaj prevoznih in zavarovalnih pogodb bi morale posebne določbe zagotoviti zadostno raven zaščite potnikov in zavarovalcev.
Therefore, Article 6 should not apply in the context of those particular contracts.
Zato se člen 6 ne bi smel uporabljati za te posebne pogodbe.
Where an insurance contract not covering a large risk covers more than one risk, at least one of which is situated in a Member State and at least one of which is situated in a third country, the special rules on insurance contracts in this Regulation should apply only to the risk or risks situated in the relevant Member State or Member States.
Kadar zavarovalna pogodba, ki ne vključuje velike nevarnosti, vključuje več kot eno nevarnost, od katere se vsaj ena nahaja v državi članici in vsaj ena v tretji državi, se bi morala posebna pravila o zavarovalnih pogodbah v tej uredbi nanašati zgolj na nevarnost ali nevarnosti, navzoče v ustrezni državi članici oziroma državah članicah.
The rule on individual employment contracts should not prejudice the application of the overriding mandatory provisions of the country to which a worker is posted in accordance with Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services.
Pravilo o individualnih pogodbah o zaposlitvi ne bi smelo posegati v uporabo prevladujočih obveznih določb države, v katero je delavec napoten v skladu z Direktivo 96/71/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 1996 o napotitvi delavcev na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev.
Employees should not be deprived of the protection afforded to them by provisions which cannot be derogated from by agreement or which can only be derogated from to their benefit.
Delavcev se ne bi smelo prikrajšati za zaščito, ki jim jo zagotavljajo določbe, od katerih ni dovoljeno odstopanje z dogovorom ali od katerih je dovoljeno odstopanje le v njihovo korist.
As regards individual employment contracts, work carried out in another country should be regarded as temporary if the employee is expected to resume working in the country of origin after carrying out his tasks abroad.
Kar zadeva pogodbe o zaposlitvi se opravljanje dela v drugi državi obravnava kot začasno, če se pričakuje, da bo delavec nadaljeval s svojim delom v državi izvora, ko bo opravil svoje naloge v tujini.
The conclusion of a new contract of employment with the original employer or an employer belonging to the same group of companies as the original employer should not preclude the employee from being regarded as carrying out his work in another country temporarily.
Sklenitev nove pogodbe o zaposlitvi s prvotnim delodajalcem ali delodajalcem, ki pripada isti skupini družb kot prvotni delodajalec, ne bi smelo izključevati tega, da se delavec obravnava, kot da začasno opravlja svoje delo v drugi državi.
Considerations of public interest justify giving the courts of the Member States the possibility, in exceptional circumstances, of applying exceptions based on public policy and overriding mandatory provisions.
Upoštevanje javnega interesa upravičuje, da se sodiščem držav članic v izjemnih okoliščinah da možnost uporabiti izjeme na podlagi javnega reda in prevladujočih obveznih določb.
The concept of ‘overriding mandatory provisions’ should be distinguished from the expression ‘provisions which cannot be derogated from by agreement’ and should be construed more restrictively.
Koncept „prevladujoče obvezne določbe“ bi bilo treba razlikovati od izraza „določbe, od katerih ni dovoljeno odstopanje z dogovorom,“ ter ga razlagati bolj restriktivno.
In the context of voluntary assignment, the term ‘relationship’ should make it clear that Article 14(1) also applies to the property aspects of an assignment, as between assignor and assignee, in legal orders where such aspects are treated separately from the aspects under the law of obligations.
V kontekstu odstopa terjatve bi moral izraz „razmerje“ pojasniti, da se člen 14(1) uporablja tudi za stvarnopravne vidike odstopa terjatve med odstopnikom in prevzemnikom v pravnih redih, v katerih so stvarnopravni in obligacijski vidiki obravnavani ločeno.
However, the term ‘relationship’ should not be understood as relating to any relationship that may exist between assignor and assignee.
Vendar se izraz „razmerje“ ne bi smel razlagati v smislu, da se nanaša na vsako razmerje, ki lahko obstaja med odstopnikom in prevzemnikom.
In particular, it should not cover preliminary questions as regards a voluntary assignment or a contractual subrogation.
Zlasti ne bi smel zajemati predhodnih vprašanj v zvezi z odstopom terjatev s pogodbo.
The term should be strictly limited to the aspects which are directly relevant to the voluntary assignment or contractual subrogation in question.
Izraz bi se moral nanašati samo na vidike, ki so neposredno relevantni za zadevni odstop terjatve s pogodbo.
For the sake of legal certainty there should be a clear definition of habitual residence, in particular for companies and other bodies, corporate or unincorporated.
Zaradi pravne varnosti je potrebna jasna opredelitev običajnega prebivališča, zlasti za družbe in druge subjekte, s pravno osebnostjo ali brez nje.
Unlike Article 60(1) of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, which establishes three criteria, the conflict-of-law rule should proceed on the basis of a single criterion; otherwise, the parties would be unable to foresee the law applicable to their situation.
Za razliko od člena 60(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 44/2001, v katerem so določena tri merila, bi moralo biti pravilo o izbiri prava vezano na eno samo merilo, sicer bi bilo pogodbenima strankama onemogočeno, da predvidita, katero pravo se bo uporabljalo za njuno zadevo.
A situation where conflict-of-law rules are dispersed among several instruments and where there are differences between those rules should be avoided.
Treba bi se bilo izogibati stanju, ko so kolizijska pravila razpršena med več instrumentov, ter razlikam med temi pravili.
This Regulation, however, should not exclude the possibility of inclusion of conflict-of-law rules relating to contractual obligations in provisions of Community law with regard to particular matters.
Vendar pa ta uredba ne izključuje možnosti vključitve kolizijskih pravil za pogodbena obligacijska razmerja v predpise prava Skupnosti v zvezi s posebnimi zadevami.
This Regulation should not prejudice the application of other instruments laying down provisions designed to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market in so far as they cannot be applied in conjunction with the law designated by the rules of this Regulation.
Ta uredba ne bi smela vplivati na uporabo drugih instrumentov, ki opredeljujejo določbe, katerih namen je prispevati k pravilnemu delovanju notranjega trga, če se te določbe ne morejo uporabljati skupaj s pravom, ki ga določajo pravila te uredbe.
The application of provisions of the applicable law designated by the rules of this Regulation should not restrict the free movement of goods and services as regulated by Community instruments, such as Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on electronic commerce).(41) Respect for international commitments entered into by the Member States means that this Regulation should not affect international conventions to which one or more Member States are parties at the time when this Regulation is adopted.
Uporaba določb prava, določenega s pravili te uredbe, ne bi smela omejevati prostega pretoka blaga in storitev, kot ga urejajo instrumenti Skupnosti, kakršen je Direktiva 2000/31/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2000 o nekaterih pravnih vidikih storitev informacijske družbe, zlasti elektronskega poslovanja na notranjem trgu (Direktiva o elektronskem poslovanju).(41) Zaradi spoštovanja mednarodnih obveznosti, ki so jih prevzele države članice, ta uredba ne bi smela vplivati na mednarodne konvencije, katerih pogodbenice so ena ali več držav članic v trenutku, ko se sprejme ta uredba.
The Commission will make a proposal to the European Parliament and to the Council concerning the procedures and conditions according to which Member States would be entitled to negotiate and conclude, on their own behalf, agreements with third countries in individual and exceptional cases, concerning sectoral matters and containing provisions on the law applicable to contractual obligations.
Komisija bo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predložila predlog v zvezi s postopki in pogoji, v skladu s katerimi bi se lahko države članice same v posameznih in izjemnih primerih v zvezi s področnimi zadevami pogajale in sklenile sporazume s tretjimi državami, ki bi vsebovali določbe o pravu, ki se uporablja za pogodbena obligacijska razmerja.