natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
it has actually exported to the Community the product concerned after the investigation period on which the measures are based, or it has entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export a significant quantity of the product concerned to the Community (the third criterion);
so dejansko izvažali zadevne izdelke v Skupnost po obdobju preiskave, na katerem temeljijo ukrepi, ali so sklenili nepreklicno pogodbeno obveznost o izvozu velike količine zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost (tretje merilo);
it operates under market economy conditions defined in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation or alternatively that it fulfils the requirements to have an individual duty applied in accordance with Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation (the fourth criterion).
delujejo pod pogoji tržnega gospodarstva, opredeljenimi v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe ali izpolnjujejo zahteve za individualno dajatev v skladu s členom 9(5) osnovne uredbe (četrto merilo).
Since the fourth criterion implies that the applicants submit a claim for Market Economy Treatment (‘MET’) and/or Individual Treatment (‘IT’), the Commission sent MET and IT claim forms to all Chinese applicants.
Ker četrto merilo določa, da vložniki predložijo zahtevek za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo („TGO“) in/ali individualno obravnavo („IO“), je Komisija poslala obrazce za zahtevke TGO in IO vsem kitajskim vložnikom.
Five Chinese applicant companies requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe je TGO zahtevalo pet kitajskih vložnikov.
One company requested only IT pursuant to Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 9(5) osnovne uredbe je ena družba zahtevala zgolj IO.
Questionnaires were sent to all applicants who were asked to supply evidence to demonstrate that they met the criteria mentioned above.
Vsem vložnikom je bil poslan vprašalnik, obenem pa so bili pozvani, da predložijo dokaze o izpolnjevanju zgoraj navedenih meril.
Exporting producers fulfilling these criteria may, pursuant to Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005, be granted either the 0 % duty rate applicable to companies to whom MET was granted in accordance with Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, or the weighted average duty rate of 28,6 % applicable to companies to whom individual IT was granted in accordance with Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki so izpolnili ta merila, se lahko v skladu s členom 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1212/2005 odobri bodisi 0-odstotna dajatev, ki se uporablja za družbe z odobreno TGO v skladu s členom 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, bodisi tehtana povprečna stopnja dajatve v višini 28,6 %, ki se uporablja za družbe z odobreno IO v skladu s členom 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission sought and verified all information it deemed necessary for the purpose of the determination of the fulfilment of the four criteria set out in Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005.
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, potrebne za določitev izpolnjevanja štirih meril iz člena 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1212/2005.
The examination of the requests established that two companies did not export the product concerned to the Community after the investigation period on which the measures are based, nor did they enter into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export the product concerned to the Community.
S preučitvijo zahtevkov je bilo ugotovljeno, da dve družbi nista izvažali zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost po obdobju preiskave, na katerem temeljijo ukrepi, niti nista sklenili nepreklicne pogodbene obveznosti o izvozu zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost.
These companies did not meet the third criterion mentioned in recital (5) above and therefore could not be granted NEPT.
Ti družbi nista izpolnili tretjega merila, navedenega v uvodni izjavi 5 in zato jima SNPI ni bil dodeljen.
Two Chinese exporting producers could not show that they were not related to exporters or producers in the People’s Republic of China which are subject to the anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005; indeed they could not successfully rebut evidence pointing to such a relationship.
Dva kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika nista mogla dokazati, da nista povezana z izvozniki ali proizvajalci v Ljudski republiki Kitajski, za katere veljajo protidampinški ukrepi, uvedeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 1212/2005; dokazov, ki so nakazovali takšen odnos, namreč nista mogla uspešno ovreči.
These companies did not meet the second criterion mentioned in recital (5) above and therefore could not be granted NEPT.
Ti družbi nista izpolnili drugega merila iz uvodne izjave 5, zato jima SNPI ni bil odobren.
One Chinese exporting producer, Weifang Stable Casting, that only requested IT, provided sufficient evidence to prove that it meets all the four criteria mentioned at recital (5) above.
En kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik, Weifang Stable Casting, ki je zahteval le IO, je predložil zadostne dokaze o izpolnjevanju vseh štirih meril iz uvodne izjave 5.
This company in fact could prove that i) it did not export to the Community the product concerned during the period 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004, ii) it is not related to any of the exporters or producers in the People’s Republic of China which are subject to the anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005, iii) it actually exported a significant quantity of the product concerned to the Community starting from the year 2008, iv) it fulfils all the requirements for IT and can therefore be granted an individual duty in accordance with Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Ta družba je dejansko lahko dokazala, da i) v obdobju od 1. aprila 2003 do 31. marca 2004 v Skupnost ni izvažala zadevnega izdelka, ii) ni povezana z nobenim izvoznikom ali proizvajalcem v Ljudski republiki Kitajski, za katerega veljajo protidampinški ukrepi, uvedeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 1212/2005, iii) je od leta 2008 v Skupnost dejansko izvažala znatno količino zadevnega izdelka, iv) izpolnjuje vse zahteve za IO in se ji zato lahko odobri individualna dajatev v skladu s členom 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, this producer could be granted the weighted average duty rate for companies granted IT applicable to the cooperating companies not included in the sample (i.e. 28,6 %) in accordance with Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005, and be added to the list of exporting producers in Article 1(2) of that Regulation.
Zato se temu proizvajalcu lahko odobri tehtana povprečna stopnja dajatve za družbe, katerim je bil odobren IO, ki se uporablja za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec (tj. 28,6 %), v skladu s členom 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1212/2005, in se ga doda na seznam proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz člena 1(2) navedene uredbe.
In consideration of the findings of the investigation as indicated in recital (12) above, it is concluded that the company Weifang Stable Casting should be added to the list of companies individually mentioned under Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005 with a duty rate of 28,6 %.
Glede na ugotovitve preiskave iz uvodne izjave 12 se ugotavlja, da je treba družbo Weifang Stable Casting dodati na seznam družb s stopnjo dajatve 28,6 %, posamično navedenih v členu 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1212/2005.
All the applicants and the Community Industry have been informed of the findings of the investigation and have had the opportunity to submit their comments.
Vložniki in industrija Skupnosti so bili obveščeni o ugotovitvah preiskave in so imeli možnost predložiti svoje pripombe.
Their comments were taken into account where appropriate,
Njihove pripombe so bile upoštevane, kjer je bilo to primerno –
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, for products described in paragraph 1 and produced in the People’s Republic of China by the companies listed below shall be as follows:
Stopnja veljavne dokončne protidampinške dajatve za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti pred plačilom dajatev, za izdelke, opisane v odstavku 1, in ki jih spodaj navedene družbe proizvajajo v Ljudski republiki Kitajski, je:
Hebei; Baoding 072350, PRC
Hebei; Baoding 072350, LRK
Fangzi District, Weifang City, Shandong Province, PRC
Fangzi District, Weifang City, Shandong Province, LRK
Council Regulation (EC) No 283/2009
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 283/2009
amending Regulation (EC) No 1858/2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of steel ropes and cables originating, inter alia, in India
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1858/2005 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, submitted following consultation with the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga, predloženega po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom,
On 12 August 1999, by Regulation (EC) No 1796/1999 [2] (the original investigation), the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of steel ropes and cables (the product concerned) originating, inter alia, in India (the country concerned).
avgusta 1999 je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1796/1999 [2] („prvotna preiskava“) uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov („zadevni izdelek“) s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije („zadevna država“).
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the products manufactured by Usha Martin Limited (UML) was set at 23,8 %.
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za izdelke, ki jih izdeluje družba Usha Martin Limited („UML“), je bila določena na 23,8 %.
By Decision 1999/572/EC [3] the Commission accepted a price undertaking from UML and as a result imports of the product concerned of Indian origin, produced by UML and covered by the undertaking, were exempt from the abovementioned definitive anti-dumping duty rate.
S Sklepom 1999/572/ES [3] je Komisija sprejela cenovno zavezo od družbe UML in zato je bil uvoz zadevnega izdelka indijskega porekla, ki ga proizvaja družba UML in ki je zajet v zavezi, izvzet iz zgoraj navedene dokončne protidampinške dajatve.
On 8 November 2005, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1858/2005 [4], decided that the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of steel ropes and cables originating, inter alia, in India should be maintained (the expiry investigation).
Svet je 8. novembra 2005, po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe, z Uredbo (ES) št. 1858/2005 [4] sklenil, da se protidampinški ukrepi, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije, ohranijo („preiskava v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa“).
On 23 January 2006, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 121/2006 [5], amended Regulation (EC) No 1858/2005 in view of a breach of the abovementioned price undertaking, and the acceptance of the undertaking was withdrawn on 22 December 2005 by Commission Decision 2006/38/EC [6].
Svet je 23. januarja 2006 z Uredbo (ES) št. 121/2006 [5] spremenil Uredbo (ES) št. 1858/2005 zaradi kršitve zgoraj navedene cenovne zaveze, sprejetje zaveze pa je bilo umaknjeno s sklepom Komisije 2006/38/ES [6].
In 2007, the Commission received a request for a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation (interim review).
Komisija je leta 2007 prejela zahtevek za delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe („vmesni pregled“).
The request, limited in scope to the examination of dumping, was lodged by UML.
Zahtevek, po obsegu omejen na proučitev dampinga, je vložila družba UML.
UML claimed that its export prices to the Community had increased at a more rapid pace than the domestic prices in India, as confirmed by the decrease of the dumping margin.
UML je trdil, da so se njegove izvozne cene za Skupnost zvišale hitreje kot domače cene v Indiji, kar potrjuje znižanje stopnje dampinga.
Thus UML argued that the circumstances on the basis of which measures were established had changed and that these changes were of a lasting nature.
UML je trdil, da so se okoliščine, na podlagi katerih so bili uvedeni ukrepi, spremenile in da so te spremembe trajne.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an interim review, the Commission decided to initiate a partial interim review in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, limited in scope to the examination of dumping as far as UML is concerned.
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom je Komisija ugotovila, da obstaja dovolj dokazov, ki upravičujejo začetek vmesnega pregleda, zato je sklenila začeti delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe, omejen na damping, ki se nanaša na UML.
The Commission published a Notice of initiation on 9 January 2008 in the Official Journal of the European Union [7] and commenced an investigation.
Komisija je 9. januarja 2008 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije objavila Obvestilo o začetku preiskave [7] in začela preiskavo.
The Commission officially advised UML, the authorities of the exporting country and the representative organisation of the Community producers, the Liaison Committee of EU Wire Ropes Industries (EWRIS), of the initiation of the partial interim review.
Komisija je o začetku delnega vmesnega pregleda uradno obvestila UML, pristojne organe države izvoznice, predstavniško organizacijo proizvajalcev Skupnosti in Povezovalni odbor industrije žičnatih vrvi Evropske unije („EWRIS“).
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane stranke so imele možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo Komisijo za zaslišanje v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
Questionnaires and verification visits
Vprašalniki in preveritveni obiski
Questionnaires were sent to UML and its related companies, all of which replied within the deadlines set for that purpose.
Komisija je družbi UML in njenim povezanim družbam poslala vprašalnike in vse odgovore prejela v rokih, določenih v ta namen.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for its analysis and carried out verification visits at the premises of the following companies:
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so se ji zdele potrebne za analizo ter opravila preveritvene obiske v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Usha Martin Limited (UML), Ranchi;
Usha Martin („UML“), Ranchi
United Arab Emirates (UAE)
Združeni arabski emirati (ZAE)
Usha Martin UK Ltd (UMUK), Worksop.
Usha Martin UK Ltd. („UMUK“), Worksop.
The review investigation period of dumping covered the period from 1 October 2006 to 30 September 2007 (RIP).
Obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom dampinga je zajemalo obdobje od 1. oktobra 2006 do 30. septembra 2007 („OPP“).
The product concerned by this partial interim review is commonly called steel wire rope (SWR) and is the same as that defined in the original and the expiry investigations which led to the imposition of measures currently in force.
Zadevni izdelek tega delnega vmesnega pregleda je splošno znan pod imenom jeklena žičnata vrv („JŽV“) in je isti kot izdelek, opredeljen v začetni preiskavi in preiskavi zaradi izteka ukrepa, na podlagi katerih so bili uvedeni trenutno veljavni ukrepi.
It consists of steel ropes and cables, including locked coil ropes, excluding ropes and cables of stainless steel, with a maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeding 3 mm originating in India, currently classifiable within CN codes ex73121081, ex73121083, ex73121085, ex73121089 and ex73121098.
Izdelek so jeklene vrvi in kabli, vključno z zaprtimi svitki vrvi, razen vrvi in kablov iz nerjavnega jekla, s prečnim prerezom največ 3 mm in s poreklom iz Indije, trenutno uvrščeni pod oznake KN ex73121081, ex73121083, ex73121085, ex73121089 in ex73121098.
It was found that SWR produced by UML and sold on the Indian domestic market and that exported by UML to the Community share the same basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics and uses.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da imajo JŽV, ki jih proizvaja družba UML in ki se prodajajo na indijskem domačem trgu, ter JŽV, ki jih družba UML izvaža v Skupnost, enake osnovne fizikalne, tehnične in kemijske značilnosti ter uporabe.
These products are therefore considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Torej se ti izdelki v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe štejejo za podobne izdelke.
For a proper comprehension of the product concerned and the like product, it should be recalled that the process to produce SWR consists of closing a number of steel strands, which themselves are composed of a bundle of steel wires from steel wire rods.
Za pravilno razumevanje zadevnega izdelka in podobnega izdelka je treba opozoriti, da postopek proizvodnje JŽV sestoji iz spajanja več jeklenih pramenov, sestavljenih iz omotka jeklenih žic iz jeklenih žičnatih palic.
It is common practice in investigations to define product control numbers (PCN), which take into account detailed product characteristics, in order to differentiate amongst the various product types produced and sold by the exporting producer on the domestic market of the country concerned and those exported to the Community.
Običajna praksa v preiskavi je določitev številčnih oznak izdelka („ŠOI“), v katerih so upoštevane podrobne značilnosti izdelka, da se omogoči razlikovanje med različnimi vrstami izdelka, ki jih proizvaja proizvajalec izvoznik in jih prodaja na domačem trgu zadevne države, ter tistimi, ki se izvažajo v Skupnost.
The Community industry claimed that two key elements were not taken into account in the definition of the proposed PCNs for the dumping calculations, namely the type of core and the tensile strength of the wire component.
Industrija Skupnosti je trdila, da pri opredelitvi predlaganih ŠOI za izračun dampinga nista bila upoštevana dva ključna elementa, in sicer vrsta stržena in natezna trdnost žičnega sestavnega dela.
However, for the purpose of establishing a dumping margin for UML, the PCNs were established in accordance with the company’s own product coding system, in order to ensure that the physical characteristics of the products sold on the domestic market were comparable to those of the products exported to the Community.
Vendar so bile v namen ugotovitve stopnje dampinga za družbo UML ŠOI določene v skladu s sistemom šifrskih oznak družbe same, da se zagotovi primerljivost fizikalnih značilnosti izdelkov, prodanih na domačem trgu, z izdelki, izvoženimi v Skupnost.
In the light of the above, it was not considered necessary to modify the PCNs and therefore the claim had to be rejected.
Glede na zgornje se ni štelo za potrebno spremeniti ŠOI in zato je bilo treba to trditev zavreči.
UML argued that closely resembling product types should be included in the comparison of exported types with those sold on their domestic market, taking into account alleged minimal differences in the rope diameter, such as the arrangements of wires in the strands, the number of strands in combinations of strand/wire, or wire characteristics, such as galvanised as opposed to non-galvanised wires.
UML je trdil, da bi zelo podobne vrste izdelkov morale biti vključene v primerjavo izvoženih izdelkov s tistimi, prodanimi na njegovem domačem trgu ob upoštevanju domnevnih minimalnih razlik v premeru žičnate vrvi, kot so razporeditev žic v pramenih, število pramenov v kombinaciji prameni/žice ali značilnosti žic, kot je obdelava z galvanizacijo ali ne.
It was however considered that the investigation reviewing alleged changed circumstances should be carried out as much as possible following the same parameters as those used in the previous investigations.
Vendar se je štelo, da je treba pri izvedbi preiskave za pregled domnevnih spremenjenih okoliščin čimbolj uporabljati iste parametre kot v prejšnjih preiskavah.
Moreover, the examination of the claim showed that the possible impact on the findings of the investigation would have been insignificant.
Poleg tega je proučitev zahtevka pokazala, da bi bil možen vpliv na ugotovitve preiskave zanemarljiv.
This claim was therefore rejected.
Zahteva je bila zato zavrnjena.
For the determination of normal value it was first established whether UML’s total volume of domestic sales of the like product were representative in comparison with its total export sales volume to the Community.
Za določanje normalne vrednosti se je najprej ugotavljalo, ali je bila skupna domača prodaja zadevnega izdelka družbe UML reprezentativna v primerjavi s skupnim izvozom družbe v Skupnost.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, domestic sales is considered representative when the total domestic sales volume is at least 5 % of the total volume of corresponding export sales to the Community.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe se domača prodaja šteje za reprezentativno, če predstavlja celotni obseg domače prodaje vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega izvoza v Skupnost.
It was found that all UML’s sales were sold in the domestic market in representative volumes.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so bili izdelki družbe UML na domačem trgu prodani v reprezentativnem obsegu.
Subsequently, those types of the product concerned sold on the domestic market by UML that were identical and directly comparable to the types sold for export to the Community, were identified.
Nato so bile opredeljene vrste zadevnega izdelka, ki jih je na domačem trgu prodajala UML in ki so bile enake ali neposredno primerljive vrstam, prodanim za izvoz v Skupnost.
For each type sold by UML on the domestic market and found to be directly comparable with the types sold for export to the Community, it was established whether domestic sales were sold in representative volume for the purposes of Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Za vsako vrsto, ki jo je družba UML prodala na domačem trgu in za katero se je izkazalo, da je neposredno primerljiva z vrstami, prodanimi za izvoz v Skupnost, se je ugotavljalo, ali je bila domača prodaja dovolj reprezentativna po obsegu za namene člena 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
It was also examined whether the domestic sales of each type could be regarded as having been made in the ordinary course of trade, pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Proučevalo se je tudi, ali bi v zvezi z domačo prodajo vsake vrste izdelka lahko veljalo, da se je prodajala v običajnem poteku trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
This was done by establishing the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market of each exported type of the product concerned during the RIP.
To je bilo izvedeno tako, da je bil ugotovljen delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu med OPP za vsako izvoženo vrsto izdelka.
For those product types where more than 80 %, by volume, of sales on the domestic market were not below unit costs, i.e. where the average sales price of the product type concerned was equal to or higher than the average production cost for the product type concerned, normal value was calculated as the average price of all domestic sales of the product type in question irrespective of whether these sales were profitable or not.
Za tiste vrste izdelka, pri katerih cena več kot 80 % obsega prodaje na domačem trgu ni bila nižja od stroškov na enoto, se pravi, kadar je bila povprečna prodajna cena zadevne vrste izdelka enaka ali višja od povprečnih proizvodnih stroškov za zadevno vrsto izdelka, je bila normalna vrednost izračunana kot povprečna cena vse domače prodaje zadevne vrste izdelka, ne glede na to, ali je bila ta prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne.
For those product types where no more than 80 %, by volume, of sales on the domestic market were not below unit costs, normal value was calculated as the weighted average sales price of those transactions which were made at or above unit costs of the type in question.
Za tiste vrste izdelka, pri katerih cena ne več kot 80 % obsega prodaje na domačem trgu ni bila pod stroški na enoto, je bila normalna vrednost izračunana kot tehtano povprečje prodajnih cen tistih transakcij, ki so bile izvedene po stroških ali nad stroški na enoto zadevne vrste izdelka.