natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
When the hazards are not covered by one of the two risk acceptance principles described in sections 2.3 and 2.4, the demonstration of the risk acceptability shall be performed by explicit risk estimation and evaluation.
Če nevarnosti niso zajete v enem od dveh načel sprejemanja tveganja iz oddelkov 2.3 in 2.4, se sprejemljivost tveganja dokaže z eksplicitno oceno in ovrednotenjem tveganja.
Risks resulting from these hazards shall be estimated either quantitatively or qualitatively, taking existing safety measures into account.
Tveganja, ki izhajajo iz teh nevarnosti, se ocenijo kvantitativno ali kvalitativno ob upoštevanju obstoječih varnostnih ukrepov.
The acceptability of the estimated risks shall be evaluated using risk acceptance criteria either derived from or based on legal requirements stated in Community legislation or in notified national rules.
Sprejemljivost ovrednotenih tveganj se ovrednoti z uporabo meril sprejemanja tveganja, ki izhajajo iz pravnih zahtev, predvidenih v zakonodaji Skupnosti, ali iz priglašenih nacionalnih pravil oziroma na njih temeljijo.
Depending on the risk acceptance criteria, the acceptability of the risk may be evaluated either individually for each associated hazard or globally for the combination of all hazards considered in the explicit risk estimation.
Glede na merila sprejemanja tveganja se lahko sprejemljivost tveganja oceni posamično za vsako povezano nevarnost ali skupaj za vse nevarnosti, upoštevane pri eksplicitni oceni tveganja.
If the estimated risk is not acceptable, additional safety measures shall be identified and implemented in order to reduce the risk to an acceptable level.
Če ocenjeno tveganje ni sprejemljivo, se določijo in izvajajo dodatni varnostni ukrepi, katerih namen je zmanjšati tveganje na sprejemljivo raven.
When the risk associated with one or a combination of several hazards is considered as acceptable, the identified safety measures shall be registered in the hazard record.
Če velja tveganje, povezano z eno ali več nevarnostmi, za sprejemljivo, se določeni varnostni ukrepi navedejo v evidenci nevarnosti.
Where hazards arise from failures of technical systems not covered by codes of practice or the use of a reference system, the following risk acceptance criterion shall apply for the design of the technical system:
Če nevarnosti nastanejo zaradi odpovedi tehničnih sistemov, ki niso vključeni v kodeks ravnanja, ali iz uporabe referenčnega sistema, se pri zasnovi tehničnega sistema upoštevajo naslednja merila sprejemanja tveganja:
For technical systems where a functional failure has credible direct potential for a catastrophic consequence, the associated risk does not have to be reduced further if the rate of that failure is less than or equal to 10-9 per operating hour.
Pri tehničnih sistemih, kjer ima lahko odpoved v delovanju neposredno katastrofalne posledice, povezanega tveganja ni treba še bolj zmanjšati, če je stopnja pojavnosti odpovedi manjša ali enaka 10-9 na delovno uro.
Without prejudice to the procedure specified in Article 8 of Directive 2004/49/EC, a more demanding criterion may be requested, through a national rule, in order to maintain a national safety level.
Brez poseganja v postopek iz člena 8 Direktive 2004/49/ES se lahko z nacionalnim pravilom zahteva strožje merilo, da se ohrani stopnja nacionalne varnosti.
However, in the case of additional authorisations for placing in service of vehicles, the procedures of Articles 23 and 25 of Directive 2008/57/EC shall apply.
Vendar se v primeru dodatnih dovoljenj za začetek obratovanja vozil uporabijo postopki iz členov 23 in 25 Direktive 2008/57/ES.
If a technical system is developed by applying the 10-9 criterion defined in point 2.5.4, the principle of mutual recognition is applicable in accordance with Article 7(4) of this Regulation.
Če je tehnični sistem razvit z uporabo merila 10-9 iz točke 2.5.4, se načelo vzajemnega priznavanja uporablja v skladu s členom 7(4) te uredbe.
Nevertheless, if the proposer can demonstrate that the national safety level in the Member State of application can be maintained with a rate of failure higher than 10-9 per operating hour, this criterion can be used by the proposer in that Member State.
Če pa lahko predlagatelj dokaže, da se lahko stopnja nacionalne varnosti v državi članici uporabe ohrani na stopnji pojavnosti odpovedi nad 10-9 na delovno uro, lahko predlagatelj to merilo uporabi v državi članici.
The explicit risk estimation and evaluation shall satisfy at least the following requirements:
Eksplicitna ocena in ovrednotenje tveganja morata izpolnjevati vsaj naslednje zahteve:
the methods used for explicit risk estimation shall reflect correctly the system under assessment and its parameters (including all operational modes);
metode, uporabljene pri eksplicitnem ovrednotenju tveganja, ustrezno odražajo sistem, ki se ocenjuje, in njegove parametre (vključno z vsemi obratovalnimi načini);
the results shall be sufficiently accurate to serve as robust decision support, i.e. minor changes in input assumptions or prerequisites shall not result in significantly different requirements.
rezultati so dovolj zanesljivi, da se lahko na njihovi podlagi sprejema odločitve, kar pomeni, da se zaradi manjših sprememb začetnih predpostavk ali predpogojev zahteve ne spremenijo znatno.
DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
DOKAZOVANJE SKLADNOSTI Z VARNOSTNIMI ZAHTEVAMI
Prior to the safety acceptance of the change, fulfilment of the safety requirements resulting from the risk assessment phase shall be demonstrated under the supervision of the proposer.
Preden se potrdi, da je sprememba varna, je treba pod nadzorom predlagatelja dokazati, da so varnostne zahteve, nastale med oceno tveganja, izpolnjene.
This demonstration shall be carried out by each of the actors responsible for fulfilling the safety requirements, as decided in accordance with point 1.1.5.
To morajo dokazati vsi udeleženci, odgovorni za izpolnjevanje varnostnih zahtev, kot je določeno v točki 1.1.5.
The approach chosen for demonstrating compliance with the safety requirements as well as the demonstration itself shall be independently assessed by an assessment body.
Izbrani pristop za dokazovanje skladnosti z varnostnimi zahtevami kot tudi samo dokazovanje neodvisno oceni ocenjevalni organ.
Any inadequacy of safety measures expected to fulfil the safety requirements or any hazards discovered during the demonstration of compliance with the safety requirements shall lead to reassessment and evaluation of the associated risks by the proposer according to section 2.
Če se izkaže, da varnostni ukrepi, katerih namen je izpolniti varnostne zahteve, niso ustrezni, ali se med dokazovanjem skladnosti z varnostnimi zahtevami odkrije kakršna koli nevarnost, mora predlagatelj v skladu z oddelkom 2 povezana tveganja ponovno oceniti in ovrednotiti.
The new hazards shall be registered in the hazard record according to section 4.
Nove nevarnosti se navedejo v evidenci nevarnosti v skladu z oddelkom 4.
HAZARD MANAGEMENT
UPRAVLJANJE Z NEVARNOSTMI
Hazard management process
Postopek upravljanja z nevarnostmi
Hazard record(s) shall be created or updated (where they already exist) by the proposer during the design and the implementation and till the acceptance of the change or the delivery of the safety assessment report.
Predlagatelj vzpostavi in posodablja evidence nevarnosti (če že obstajajo) med zasnovo in izvajanjem do sprejetja spremembe ali prejetja poročila o varnostni oceni.
The hazard record shall track the progress in monitoring risks associated with the identified hazards.
V evidenci nevarnosti se beleži napredek, dosežen pri spremljanju tveganj, povezanih z ugotovljenimi nevarnostmi.
In accordance with point 2(g) of Annex III to Directive 2004/49/EC, once the system has been accepted and is operated, the hazard record shall be further maintained by the infrastructure manager or the railway undertaking in charge with the operation of the system under assessment as an integrated part of its safety management system.
V skladu s točko 2(g) Priloge III k Direktivi 2004/49/ES po tem, ko se sistem sprejme in deluje, evidenco nevarnosti nadalje vzdržuje upravljavec železniške infrastrukture ali prevoznik v železniškem prometu, ki je odgovoren za delovanje ocenjevanega sistema, kot sestavni del svojega sistema varnega upravljanja.
The hazard record shall include all hazards, together with all related safety measures and system assumptions identified during the risk assessment process.
V evidenci nevarnosti so navedene vse nevarnosti, skupaj z vsemi povezanimi varnostnimi ukrepi in predpostavkami glede sistema, odkritimi v postopku ocenjevanja tveganja.
In particular, it shall contain a clear reference to the origin and to the selected risk acceptance principles and shall clearly identify the actor(s) in charge of controlling each hazard.
Zlasti so jasno navedeni izvor in izbrana načela sprejemanja tveganja ter udeleženci, ki so odgovorni za nadzor vsake nevarnosti.
All hazards and related safety requirements which cannot be controlled by one actor alone shall be communicated to another relevant actor in order to find jointly an adequate solution.
O vseh nevarnostih in z njimi povezanih varnostnih zahtevah, ki jih ne more nadzorovati samo en udeleženec, je treba obvestiti drugega ustreznega udeleženca, da skupaj poiščeta primerno rešitev.
The hazards registered in the hazard record of the actor who transfers them shall only be ‘controlled’ when the evaluation of the risks associated with these hazards is made by the other actor and the solution is agreed by all concerned.
Nevarnosti, navedene v evidenci nevarnosti udeleženca, ki jih ta prenese, so „nadzorovane“ le, če drugi udeleženec ovrednoti tveganja, povezana s temi nevarnostmi, in se vse udeležene strani strinjajo z rešitvijo.
EVIDENCE FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS
DOKAZILA O UPORABI POSTOPKA UPRAVLJANJA S TVEGANJI
The risk management process used to assess the safety levels and compliance with safety requirements shall be documented by the proposer in such a way that all the necessary evidence showing the correct application of the risk management process is accessible to an assessment body.
Predlagatelj postopek upravljanja s tveganji, ki je bil uporabljen za oceno ravni varnosti in skladnosti z varnostnimi zahtevami, dokumentira na tak način, da so ocenjevalnemu organu dostopna vsa potrebna dokazila o pravilni uporabi postopka upravljanja s tveganji.
The assessment body shall establish its conclusion in a safety assessment report.
Ocenjevalni organ svoje zaključke navede v poročilu o varnostni oceni.
The document produced by the proposer under point 5.1. shall at least include:
Dokument, ki ga pripravi predlagatelj v skladu s točko 5.1, vključuje vsaj:
description of the organisation and the experts appointed to carry out the risk assessment process;
opis organizacije in strokovnjake, imenovane za izvedbo postopka ocenjevanja tveganj;
results of the different phases of the risk assessment and a list of all the necessary safety requirements to be fulfilled in order to control the risk to an acceptable level.
rezultate različnih faz ocene tveganja in seznam vseh potrebnih varnostnih zahtev, ki jih je treba izpolniti, da se tveganje zmanjša na sprejemljivo raven.
CRITERIA WHICH MUST BE FULFILLED BY THE ASSESSMENT BODIES
MERILA, KI JIH MORAJO IZPOLNJEVATI OCENJEVALNI ORGANI
The assessment body may not become involved either directly or as authorised representatives in the design, manufacture, construction, marketing, operation or maintenance of the system under assessment.
Ocenjevalni organ ne more biti neposredno ali kot pooblaščeni predstavnik udeležen pri zasnovi, proizvodnji, izgradnji, trženju, delovanju ali vzdrževanju sistema, ki se ocenjuje.
This does not exclude the possibility of an exchange of technical information between that body and all the involved actors.
To ne izključuje možnosti izmenjave tehničnih informacij med tem organom in vsemi aktivnimi udeleženci.
The assessment body must carry out the assessment with the greatest possible professional integrity and the greatest possible technical competence and must be free of any pressure and incentive, in particular of a financial type, which could affect their judgement or the results of their assessments, in particular from persons or groups of persons affected by the assessments.
Ocenjevalni organ mora oceno izvesti z največjo možno poklicno integriteto in največjo možno tehnično usposobljenostjo, ne sme biti pod pritiskom ali prejemati spodbud, zlasti finančne narave, ki bi lahko vplivale na njegovo presojo ali rezultate njegovih ocen, zlasti od oseb ali skupin oseb, za katere je ocena pomembna.
The assessment body must possess the means required to perform adequately the technical and administrative tasks linked with the assessments; it shall also have access to the equipment needed for exceptional assessments.
Ocenjevalni organ mora imeti sredstva, potrebna za pravilno izvajanje tehničnih in upravnih nalog, povezanih z ocenami. Imeti mora tudi dostop do opreme, ki je potrebna za izredne ocene.
The staff responsible for the assessments must possess:
Osebje, odgovorno za oceno, mora izpolnjevati naslednje pogoje:
proper technical and vocational training,
ima primerno tehnično in poklicno izobrazbo,
a satisfactory knowledge of the requirements relating to the assessments that they carry out and sufficient practice in those assessments,
ima zadovoljivo znanje o zahtevah za ocene, ki jih opravlja, in zadostno prakso na tem področju,
the ability to draw up the safety assessment reports which constitute the formal conclusions of the assessments conducted.
je sposobno pripraviti poročila o varnostni oceni, ki predstavljajo uradne zaključke opravljene ocene.
The independence of the staff responsible for the independent assessments must be guaranteed.
Neodvisnost zaposlenih, ki so odgovorni za neodvisne ocene, mora biti zajamčena.
No official must be remunerated either on the basis of the number of assessments performed or of the results of those assessments.
Noben uradnik ne sme biti plačan na podlagi števila opravljenih ocen ali na podlagi rezultatov navedenih ocen.
Where the assessment body is external to the proposer’s organisation must have its civil liability ensured unless that liability is covered by the State under national law or unless the assessments are carried out directly by that Member State.
Če ocenjevalni organ ni del predlagateljeve organizacije, mora imeti sklenjeno zavarovanje za civilnopravno odgovornost, razen če v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo to odgovornost krije država ali če ocenjevanje neposredno opravi ta država članica.
Where the assessment body is external to the proposer’s organisation its staff are bound by professional secrecy with regard to everything they learn in the performance of their duties (with the exception of the competent administrative authorities in the State where they perform those activities) in pursuance of this Regulation.
Če ocenjevalni organ ni del predlagateljeve organizacije, so njegovi zaposleni zavezani k poklicni molčečnosti o vsem, kar izvejo med opravljanjem svojih dolžnosti v skladu s to uredbo (razen do pristojnih upravnih organov v državi, kjer izvajajo te dejavnosti).
As a formalised risk-based approach is relatively new in some Member States, the CSM on risk evaluation and assessment should remain voluntary with respect to operational or organisational changes until 1 July 2012.
Ker je formaliziran pristop na podlagi tveganj v nekaterih državah članicah razmeroma nov, naj bi bil SVM za ovrednotenje in ocenjevanje tveganja v zvezi z operativnimi in organizacijskimi spremembami do 1. julija 2012 prostovoljen.
This should allow the European Railway Agency to assist such applications, where possible, and to propose improvements, if appropriate, to that CSM before 1 July 2012.
Tako naj bi Evropska železniška agencija lahko v okviru možnosti pomagala pri uporabi in do 1. julija 2012 po potrebi predlagala izboljšave tega SVM.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 353/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 353/2009
amending Council Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 renewing and strengthening the restrictive measures in respect of Burma/Myanmar
o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 194/2008 o obnovitvi in okrepitvi omejevalnih ukrepov v zvezi z Burmo/Mjanmarom
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 of 25 February 2008 renewing and strengthening the restrictive measures in respect of Burma/Myanmar and repealing Regulation (EC) No 817/2006 [1], and in particular Article 18(1)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 194/2008 z dne 25. februarja 2008 o obnovitvi in okrepitvi omejevalnih ukrepov v zvezi z Burmo/Mjanmarom in o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 817/2006 [1] ter zlasti člena 18(1)(b) Uredbe,
Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 is hereby replaced by the text of Annex I to this Regulation.
Priloga VI k Uredbi (ES) št. 194/2008 se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge I k tej uredbi.
Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 is hereby replaced by the text of Annex II to this Regulation.
Priloga VII k Uredbi (ES) št. 194/2008 se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge II k tej uredbi.
List of members of the Government of Burma/Myanmar and persons, entities and bodies associated with them referred to in Article 11
Seznam članov vlade Burme/Mjanmara ter z njimi povezanih oseb, subjektov in organov iz člena 11
Aliases or variations in spelling are denoted by “a.k.a.”.
Vzdevki ali spremembe pri črkovanju so označeni s ‚tudi‘.
means date of birth.
pomeni kraj rojstva.
If not stated otherwise, all passport and ID cards are those of Burma/Myanmar.
Vsi potni listi in osebne izkaznice so dokumenti Burme/Mjanmara, razen če ni navedeno drugače.
Identifying data and reason for listing (function/title, date and place of birth, passport/id number, spouse or son/daughter of …)
Podatki za ugotavljanje identitete in razlogi za vključitev na seznam (funkcija/naziv, datum in kraj rojstva, številka potnega lista (št.p.l.)/osebne izkaznice (št.o.i.), soprog(a) ali sin/hči …)
Since 23.6.2008.
Sagaing, Magwe, Mandalay) od 23.6.2008 (prej B9a)
Identifying information (including Command or other reason for listing)
Podatki za ugotavljanje identitete (vključno s poveljstvom ali drugim razlogom za vključitev na seznam)
Eastern (Shan State (South))
Vzhodna država Shan (jug), (prej G23a)
Western (Rakhine State)
Zahodna država (Rakhine) (prej B2a)
Identifying information (including Ministry or other reason for listing)
Podatki za ugotavljanje identitete (vključno z ministrstvom ali drugim razlogom za vključitev na seznam)
Agriculture and Irrigation (since 18.9.2004) (formerly Cooperatives since 25.8.2003), Secretary-General of the Union Solidarity and Development Association
Kmetijstvo in namakanje (od 18.9.2004) (prej Zadruge od 25.8.2003), generalni sekretar USDA
Son of Aung Thaung (married to Nandar Aye). Director IGE Co. Ltd
Sin Aung Thaunga (poročen z A2c), direktor IGE Co.Ltd
Industry 2 (since June 2008)
Industrija 2 (od junija 2008) (prej G38a)
Brig-Gen Kyaw Myint
Brigadni general Kyaw Myin
Identifying information (including post held or other reason for listing)
Podatki za ugotavljanje identitete (vključno s položajem ali drugimi razlogi za vključitev na seznam)
Identifying information (including function or other reason for listing)
Podatki za ugotavljanje identitete (vključno s funkcijo ali drugim razlogom za vključitev na seznam)
Director of Artillery & Armour, Board member Union of Myanmar Economic Holdings Ltd
Direktor topniškega in oklopnega oddelka, član uprave UMEHL
Director of Procurement and Managing Director Union of Myanmar Economic Holdings
Direktor za javna naročila in generalni direktor Union of Myanmar Economic Holdings (prej generalmajor Win Hlaing, K1a)
Adjutant General (promoted from South Western Regional Command)
Generalov pribočnik (prej B8a, napredoval iz jugozahodnega regionalnega poveljništva)
Vice Mayor of Yangon City Development I (Member of the Central Executive I)
Podžupan mesta Yangon, Oddelek za razvoj I (član centralnega izvršilnega odbora I)
Identifying information (including company or other reason for listing)
Podatki za ugotavljanje identitete (vključno s podjetjem ali drugim razlogom za vključitev na seznam)
Formerly Managing Director, Union of Myanmar Economic Holdings Ltd, Myawaddy Bank
Nekdanji generalni direktor, Union of Myanmar Economic Holdings, Myawaddy Bank
Managing Director Union of Myanmar Economic Holding Ltd
Generalni direktor Union of Myanmar Economic Holding LTD (UMEH)
Board of Directors, Union of Myanmar Economic Holdings Ltd
Upravni svet, Union of Myanmar economic holdings Ltd
Departmental Managing Director, Myawaddy Trading
Generalni direktor oddelka, Myawaddy trading
Governor of Central Bank of Myanmar M
Guverner Centralne banke Mjanmara
General Manager of Myanmar Investment and Commercial Bank
Generalni direktor MICB
List of enterprises owned or controlled by the Government of Burma/Myanmar or its members or persons associated with them, referred to in Article 15
Seznam podjetij, ki so v lasti ali pod nadzorom vlade Burme/Mjanmara ali njenih članov ali z njimi povezanih oseb, iz člena 15
Joint ventures
Skupna podjetja
Government owned commercial enterprises
Trgovinska podjetja v lasti vlade
Others
Druga podjetja
Tun Myint Naing a.k.a. Steven Law (J4a, Annex VI)
Tun Myint Naing tudi Steven Law (J4a, Priloga VI)
Chairman/Director: Tun Myint Naing a.k.a. Steven Law (J4a, Annex VI)
predsednik/direktor: Tun Myint Naing tudi Steven Law (J4a, Priloga VI)
Directors: “Dagon” Win Aung and Daw Moe Mya Mya
direktorja: ‚Dagon‘ Win Aung in Daw Moe Mya Mya
Directors, “Dagon” Win Aung, Daw Moe Mya Mya and Ei Hnin Pwint a.k.a. Chistabelle Aung
Direktorji: ‚Dagon‘ Win Aung, Daw Moe Mya Mya in Ei Hnin Pwint tudi Chistabelle Aung
Directors Nay Aung (D15e Annex VI) and Pyi (Pye) Aung (D15g Annex VI) and Managing Director Win Kyaing
direktorja Nay Aung (D15e, Priloga VI) in Pyi (Pye) Aung (D15g, Priloga VI) ter generalni direktor Win Kyaing
Owned by Maj-Gen Hla Htay Win (A9a Annex VI)
v lasti generalmajorja Hlaja Htaya Wina (A9a, Priloga VI)
Owner Aung Zaw Ye Myint (Previously A9d Annex VI) son of General Ye Myint (Previously A9a)
lastnik Aung Zaw Ye Myint (prej A9d, Priloga VI), sin generala Yeja Myinta (prej A9a)
Owner: Kyaing San Shwe(A1h Annex VI) son of Senior General Than Shwe (A1a)
lastnik Kyainga Sana Shwea (A1h, Priloga VI), sin vrhovnega poveljnika generala Thana Shwea (A1a)
Shareholder Kyaw Myo Nyunt (J8c Annex VI) son of Maj-Gen Nyunt Tin, Minister of Agriculture (Retired) (J8a Annex VI)
delničar Kyaw Myo Nyunt (J8c, Priloga VI), sin generalmajorja Nyunta Tina, minister za kmetijstvo (v pokoju) (J8a, Priloga VI)
Part Owner: Aung Soe Tha (D20e Annex VI)
delni lastnik: Aung Soe Tha (D20e, Priloga VI)
Owner: Yin Win Thu, Partner: Nandar Aye (A2c Annex VI)
lastnik Yin Win Thu, partnerka: Nandar Aye (A2c, Priloga VI)
Common Position 2009/351/CFSP of 27 April 2009 [2] amends Annexes II and III to Common Position 2006/318/CFSP of 27 April 2006.
S Skupnim stališčem 2009/351/SZVP z dne 27. aprila 2009 [2] sta se spremenili prilogi II in III k Skupnemu stališču 2006/318/SZVP z dne 27. aprila 2006.
Annexes VI and VII to Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 should, therefore, be amended accordingly.
Prilogi VI in VII k Uredbi (ES) št. 194/2008 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Chief of Armed Forces Training, Since 23.6.2008. Owner of Htay Co. (logging and timber)
Načelnik usposabljanja oboroženih sil, od 23.6.2008, (prej B1a), lastnik Htay Co. (sečnja in les)
Steven Law Asia World Co., d.o.b.
Stewen Law Asia World Co., d.r.
and/or Parami Road, South Okkalapa, Yangon
in/ali Parami Road, South Okkalapa, Yangon
Tel: 01-650021 654463
Telefon.: 01- 650021 654463
Since June 2008. Board member UMEHL
Glavni poveljnik (mornarica) od junija 2008, član uprave UMEHL (prej G39a)
E-mail: kyawtha.wl@mptmail.net.mm
E-naslov: kyawtha.wl@mptmail.net.mm
Commission Regulation (EC) No 354/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 354/2009
This Regulation shall enter into force on 30 April 2009.
Ta uredba začne veljati 30. aprila 2009.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 355/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 355/2009