natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Financing will generally take the form of direct purchase of goods and services under existing framework contracts.
Financiranje se bo pretežno izvajalo v obliki neposrednega nakupa blaga in storitev na podlagi obstoječih okvirnih pogodb.
It may also take the form of grants.
Lahko je tudi v obliki nepovratnih sredstev.
Information and promotion campaigns including:
Informativne in promocijske kampanje, ki vključujejo:
high visibility events and forums for exchanging experience and good practices,
odmevne dogodke in forume za izmenjavo izkušenj in dobrih praks,
contests with or without prizes,
tekmovanja z nagradami ali brez njih,
cooperation with the private sector, broadcasters and other media as partners for disseminating information on voluntary activities and the European Year,
sodelovanje z zasebnim sektorjem, izdajatelji radijskih in televizijskih programov in drugimi mediji kot partnerji pri razširjanju informacij o prostovoljnih dejavnostih in evropskem letu,
the production of material and tools for media available throughout the EU to stimulate public interest,
pripravo gradiva in pripomočkov za medije, ki bodo na voljo v vsej EU za povečanje zanimanja javnosti,
measures to publicise the results and raise the profile of Community programmes, schemes and initiatives contributing to the objectives of the European Year,
ukrepe za javno objavljanje rezultatov in večjo prepoznavnost programov, projektov in pobud Skupnosti, ki prispevajo k ciljem evropskega leta,
the establishment of an information website on the Europa site, including a portal for promoters of projects on volunteering, to guide them through the various Community programmes and initiatives.
vzpostavitev informacijske strani na spletni strani Europa, vključno s portalom za nosilce projektov v zvezi s prostovoljstvom, ki jih bo vodil po različnih programih in pobudah Skupnosti.
Other initiatives:
Druge pobude:
surveys and studies at Community level to assess and report on the preparation, effectiveness, impact and long-term monitoring of the European Year.
raziskave in študije na ravni Skupnosti za oceno in poročanje o pripravi, učinkovitosti, vplivu in dolgoročnem spremljanju evropskega leta.
CO-FINANCING COMMUNITY INITIATIVES
SOFINANCIRANJE POBUD SKUPNOSTI
High-visibility events on a European scale that aim to raise awareness of the objectives of the European Year, possibly organised in cooperation with the Presidencies in office during 2011, may receive a Community grant of up to 80 % of the total eligible cost.
Odmevni dogodki na evropski ravni, katerih cilj je ozaveščanje o ciljih evropskega leta in ki se po možnosti organizirajo v sodelovanju s predsedujočima državama v letu 2011, lahko prejmejo donacijo Skupnosti, ki znaša največ 80 % skupnih upravičenih stroškov.
CO-FINANCING NATIONAL INITIATIVES
SOFINANCIRANJE NACIONALNIH POBUD
Each national coordinating body shall submit a single application for Community funding.
Vsak nacionalni usklajevalni organ predloži samo en zahtevek za finančna sredstva Skupnosti.
That grant application shall describe the national coordinating body’s work programme or the action to be funded and promote the European Year.
V zahtevku za finančna sredstva je opisan delovni program nacionalnega usklajevalnega organa ali ukrep, ki se bo financiral in je namenjen promociji evropskega leta.
The grant application shall be accompanied by a detailed budget setting out the total costs of the initiatives/work programme proposed and the amount and sources of co-funding.
Zahtevku za donacijo je priložen podroben proračun, ki določa skupne stroške predlaganih pobud/delovnega programa ter znesek in vire sofinanciranja.
The Community grant can cover up to 80 % of the total eligible cost.
Finančna sredstva Skupnosti lahko krijejo največ 80 % skupnih upravičenih stroškov.
The Commission shall determine the indicative amounts available for grants to each national coordinating body and the deadline for submission of the applications.
Komisija določi okvirne zneske, ki so na voljo za donacije posameznim nacionalnim usklajevalnim programom, in rok za predložitev zahtevkov.
The criteria should take into account the population, the cost of living and a fixed amount per Member State to guarantee a minimum level of activities.
V merilih je treba upoštevati prebivalstvo, življenjske stroške in nespremenljiv znesek na državo članico za zagotovitev najnižje stopnje dejavnosti.
The final amounts awarded shall be determined on the basis of the individual grant applications submitted by the national coordinating body.
Končni zneski, ki se bodo dodelili, se določijo na podlagi posameznih zahtevkov za donacije, ki jih predložijo nacionalni usklajevalni organi.
The maximum Community co-financing is set at 80 % of the total eligible cost.
Skupnost sofinancira največ 80 % skupnih upravičenih stroškov.
The work programmes/actions may include:
Delovni programi/ukrepi lahko vključujejo:
meetings and events connected with the objectives of the European Year, including national events to launch and promote the European Year, create a catalyst effect and provide open space for debate on concrete initiatives,
srečanja in dogodke, povezane s cilji evropskega leta, vključno z nacionalnimi dogodki za začetek in promocijo evropskega leta, ustvarjanje spodbujevalnega učinka in zagotovitev odprtega prostora za razpravo o konkretnih pobudah,
conferences and seminars at national, regional and local levels allowing for mutual learning and exchange of good practices,
konference in seminarje na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni, ki omogočajo vzajemno učenje in izmenjavo dobrih praks,
information, research activities and related studies, educational and promotional campaigns at national, regional and local levels, including the organisation of awards and competitions,
informiranje, raziskovalne dejavnosti in s tem povezane študije, izobraževalne in promocijske kampanje na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni, vključno z organizacijo nagrajevanja in tekmovanj,
cooperation with the media.
sodelovanje z mediji.
INITIATIVES NOT RECEIVING ANY COMMUNITY FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
POBUDE, ZA KATERE SE NE DODELI FINANČNA POMOČ SKUPNOSTI
The Community will grant non-financial support, including written authorisation to use the logo, once developed, and other materials associated with the European Year, to initiatives carried out by public or private organisations, in so far as they provide assurances to the Commission that the initiatives in question are or will be carried out during 2011 and are likely to make a significant contribution to achieving the objectives of the European Year.
Skupnost bo odobrila nefinančno podporo, vključno s pisno odobritvijo uporabe logotipa, ko bo oblikovan, in drugega gradiva, povezanega z evropskim letom, za pobude javnih ali zasebnih organizacij, če lahko te organizacije Komisiji zagotovijo, da se bodo te pobude izvajale ali izvedle v letu 2011 in bodo verjetno učinkovito prispevale k uresničevanju ciljev evropskega leta.
on State aid C 20/08 (ex N 62/08) which Italy is planning to implement through a modification of scheme N 59/04 concerning a temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding
o državni pomoči C 20/08 (ex N 62/08), ki jo Italija namerava izvesti v skladu s spremenjeno shemo N 59/04 o začasnem obrambnem mehanizmu za ladjedelništvo
(notified under document C(2008) 6015)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 6015)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [1],
po pozivu zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi določbami [1],
By letter dated 1 February 2008, registered as received at the Commission on the same day, Italy notified the Commission of State aid C 20/08 (ex N 62/08).
Z dopisom z dne 1. februarja 2008, ki ga je Komisija evidentirala istega dne, je Italija Komisiji priglasila državno pomoč C 20/08 (ex N 62/08).
By letter registered as received at the Commission on 18 March 2008, Italy provided the Commission with further information.
Z dopisom, ki ga je Komisija evidentirala 18. marca 2008, je Italija Komisiji predložila dodatne informacije.
By letter dated 30 April 2008 the Commission informed Italy that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid.
Z dopisom z dne 30. aprila 2008 je Komisija sporočila Italiji, da bo v zvezi s pomočjo sprožila postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES.
This decision was notified to Italy on 7 May 2008.
Italija je bila o tej odločitvi uradno obveščena 7. maja 2008.
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the aid.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane stranke, naj predložijo svoje pripombe glede pomoči.
By e-mail of 4 June 2008, registered as received at the Commission on that day (i.e. within the deadline for the submission of comments from Italy laid down in the decision to initiate the procedure), Italy asked for the period for submitting comments to be extended by one month.
Po elektronski pošti z dne 4. junija 2008, ki jo je Komisija evidentirala istega dne (tj. v roku za predložitev pripomb Italije, določenim v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka), je Italija zaprosila za enomesečno podaljšanje obdobja za predložitev pripomb.
The Italian shipyard Cantiere Navale De Poli s.p.a.
Italijanska ladjedelnica Cantiere Navale De Poli s.p.a.
According to the information in the notification, it is one of two shipyards which could potentially benefit from State aid under the scheme mentioned in recital 6 below, provided that the notified aid is approved.
Glede na informacije v uradnem obvestilu je De Poli ena od dveh ladjedelnic, ki bi lahko koristila državno pomoč v skladu s shemo, navedeno v uvodni izjavi 6, če se priglašena pomoč odobri.
De Poli claims that it had only belatedly become aware of the Commission’s decision to initiate the procedure and of Italy’s comments on this decision.
De Poli izjavlja, da je bila prepozno seznanjena z odločitvijo Komisije o sprožitvi postopka in s pripombami Italije glede te odločitve.
Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty requires the Commission to give the parties concerned notice to submit their comments.
V členu 88(2) Pogodbe ES je določeno, da mora Komisija zadevne stranke pozvati k predložitvi pripomb.
However, it does not require the Commission to notify interested parties individually, but to ensure that all potentially interested parties have the opportunity to submit comments.
Vendar od Komisije ne zahteva, da zainteresirane stranke uradno obvešča posamezno, ampak da vsem potencialno zainteresiranim strankam zagotovi možnost predložitve pripomb.
The publication of a notice in the Official Journal is an appropriate means of informing all the parties concerned that a procedure has been initiated [3].
Objava uradnega obvestila v Uradnem listu je ustrezen način obveščanja vseh zadevnih strank o sprožitvi postopka [3].
Consequently, De Poli must be considered to have been given due notice of the decision to initiate the procedure and of the time limit set for submitting comments through the publication cited above.
Zato je treba obravnavati, da je bila De Poli z zgoraj navedeno objavo pravočasno obveščena o odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka in roku, določenim za predložitev pripomb.
Nevertheless, De Poli failed to comply with the prescribed period for the submission of comments provided for in Article 6(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [4] (hereinafter ‘the Procedural Regulation’).
Kljub temu De Poli ni upoštevala predpisanega obdobja za predložitev pripomb iz člena 6(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES [4] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Postopkovna uredba).
The Commission notes that De Poli did not request an extension of the period for submitting comments or indicate any particular reason why its comments should be taken into account despite being submitted after expiry of the deadline.
Komisija ugotavlja, da De Poli ni zaprosila za podaljšanje obdobja za predložitev pripomb ali navedla posebnega razloga, zakaj bi bilo treba njene pripombe upoštevati kljub temu, da so bile predložene po izteku roka.
The Commission will consequently disregard De Poli’s belated comments.
Komisija zato zapoznelih pripomb De Poli ne bo upoštevala.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE AID
NATANČNI OPIS POMOČI
By letter C(2004)1807 final of 19 May 2004 the Commission decided not to raise any objections to an Italian State aid scheme concerning a defensive temporary mechanism for shipbuilding [5] (hereinafter ‘the scheme’).
V dopisu C(2004)1807 konč. z dne 19. maja 2004 je Komisija navedla odločitev, da ne bo ugovarjala italijanski shemi državne pomoči o začasnem obrambnem mehanizmu za ladjedelništvo [5] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: shema).
The Commission considered the scheme to be compatible with the common market since it complied with the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 1177/2002 of 27 June 2002 concerning a temporary defensive mechanism to shipbuilding [6], as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 502/2004 [7] (hereinafter ‘the TDM Regulation’).
Komisija je menila, da je shema združljiva s skupnim trgom, ker je v skladu z določbami Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1177/2002 z dne 27. junija 2002 o začasnem obrambnem mehanizmu za ladjedelništvo [6], kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 502/2004 [7] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Uredba o začasnem obrambnem mehanizmu).
The scheme as notified to and approved by the Commission was allocated a budget of EUR 10 million.
Za shemo, kot je bila priglašena Komisiji in ki jo je Komisija odobrila, je bil dodeljen proračun v višini 10 milijonov EUR.
Italy has notified the Commission of its plans to allocate another EUR 10 million to the scheme’s budget.
Italija je Komisijo uradno obvestila, da namerava za proračun sheme dodeliti dodatnih 10 milijonov EUR.
The Commission initiated the formal investigation procedure under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty because it had doubts as to whether the notified aid was compatible with the common market for the reasons set out below.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES sprožila formalni postopek preiskave, ker je zaradi razlogov, navedenih v nadaljevanju, dvomila o združljivosti priglašene pomoči s skupnim trgom.
In view of Article 1(c) of the Procedural Regulation and Article 4 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [8] (hereinafter ‘the Implementing Regulation’), the Commission considered that the notified budget increase constituted an alteration to the scheme and thus new aid to be notified to the Commission under Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty.
Ob upoštevanju člena 1(c) Postopkovne uredbe in člena 4 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES [8] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Izvedbena uredba), je Komisija menila, da pomeni priglašeno povečanje proračuna spremembo sheme, zaradi česar je treba Komisiji priglasiti novo pomoč v skladu s členom 88(3) Pogodbe ES.
The Commission further considered that the compatibility of the notified aid with the common market had to be assessed in the light of the rules currently applicable.
Komisija je prav tako menila, da je treba združljivost priglašene pomoči s skupnim trgom oceniti ob upoštevanju trenutno veljavnih pravil.
The TDM Regulation ceased to apply on 31 March 2005 and consequently does not provide a legal basis for approving the aid.
Uredba o začasnem obrambnem mehanizmu je prenehala veljati 31. marca 2005, zato ne zagotavlja pravne podlage za odobritev pomoči.
The Commission also noted that the aid did not appear compatible with the common market under any relevant State aid provisions.
Komisija je ugotovila tudi, da pomoč ni bila združljiva s skupnim trgom v skladu z nobeno od ustreznih določb o državni pomoči.
Italy has contested the Commission’s doubts and made the following comments.
Italija je nasprotovala pomislekom Komisije in je predložila naslednje pripombe.
First of all, Italy contests the Commission’s view that the notified measure constitutes new aid.
Na začetku Italija nasprotuje stališču Komisije, da pomeni priglašeni ukrep novo pomoč.
Italy argues that under a proper construction of Article 4 of the Implementing Regulation, classification as new aid should be reserved for increases in the budgets of approved aid schemes that are accompanied by an extension of the time limits within which companies may have access to the relevant benefits, with consequent distortive effects on competition.
Italija trdi, da se mora opredelitev za novo pomoč v skladu z natančno razlago člena 4 Izvedbene uredbe uporabljati za povečanje proračunov odobrenih shem pomoči skupaj s podaljšanjem rokov, v času katerih lahko podjetja dostopijo do pomembnih ugodnosti, kar povzroča učinke izkrivljanja konkurence.
Italy argues that this clearly does not apply in this case, which concerns completing initiatives for which a formal application was made while the TDM Regulation was still in force.
Italija trdi, da navedeno ne velja v tem primeru, ki zadeva izpolnjevanje pobud, za katere se je pripravila uradna vloga še v času veljavnosti Uredbe o začasnem obrambnem mehanizmu.
In this connection Italy also argues that Article 4 of the Implementing Regulation is a procedural provision setting out the procedures for notification of certain alterations of existing aid, which has nothing to do with the assessment of compatibility, and that the Commission cannot therefore draw on this Article to assess the compatibility of the proposed State aid.
V zvezi s tem Italija trdi tudi, da je člen 4 Izvedbene uredbe postopkovna določba, ki določa postopke za priglasitev nekaterih sprememb obstoječe pomoči, kar nima nič skupnega z oceno o združljivosti, in zaradi česar Komisija na podlagi tega člena ne more oceniti združljivosti predlagane državne pomoči.
Italy then comments on the Commission’s view that the TDM Regulation no longer provides a legal basis for the compatibility of the notified aid.
Italija nato navaja pripombe glede stališča Komisije, da Uredba o začasnem obrambnem mehanizmu ne zagotavlja več pravne podlage za združljivost priglašene pomoči.
Italy argues first that this position is inconsistent with the position adopted in the TDM Regulation, which, despite being intended to apply up to 31 March 2004 (later extended to 31 March 2005) had its legal basis in Council Regulation (EC) No 1540/98 of 29 June 1998 establishing new rules on aid to shipbuilding [9] (hereinafter ‘the Shipbuilding Regulation’), which would already expire on 31 December 2003.
Italija najprej trdi, da takšno stališče ni v skladu s stališčem, sprejetim v Uredbi o začasnem obrambnem mehanizmu, ki ima kljub temu, da naj bi veljala do 31. marca 2004 (pozneje se je njena veljavnost podaljšala do 31. marca 2005), pravno podlago v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1540/98 z dne 29. junija 1998 o določitvi novih pravil o pomoči ladjedelništvu [9] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Uredba o ladjedelništvu), ki bi prenehala veljati že 31. decembra 2003.
In addition Italy considers that it is not clear why the TDM Regulation cannot justify ‘updating’ the aid scheme budget, this being simply a financial operation intended to put shipbuilders who made applications in line with the TDM Regulation when it was still in force, but who failed to benefit from the aid because of the budgetary shortfall, on an equal footing with shipbuilders who have already benefited from the aid, in keeping with the general principle of equal treatment.
Poleg tega Italija meni, da ni jasno, zakaj Uredba o začasnem obrambnem mehanizmu ne more upravičiti „posodobitve“ proračuna sheme pomoči, saj je to le finančni posel, katerega namen je v skladu s splošnim načelom enakega obravnavanja določiti enake pogoje za ladjedelničarje, ki so predložili zahtevke v skladu z Uredbo o začasnem obrambnem mehanizmu, ko je še veljala, vendar niso prejeli pomoči zaradi proračunskega primanjkljaja, in ladjedelničarje, ki so že prejeli pomoč.
Italy argues that although the updating of public policy resources designed to correct the effects of time or of cost forecasts that have proved inadequate involves increasing the initial aid, it does not constitute new aid, or is compatible under the legal basis that justified the original aid.
Italija trdi, da posodobitev javnih sredstev za popravo učinkov časa ali napovedi stroškov, ki so se izkazali za neustrezne, čeprav vključuje povečanje začetne pomoči, ne pomeni nove pomoči in je združljiva s pravno podlago, ki upravičuje prvotno pomoč.
In short, for Italy, this is just a question of settling pending cases of requests for aid referring to contracts concluded before 31 March 2005, without this implying an extension of the scheme, a widening of its scope or a change in its fundamental structure.
Na kratko, po mnenju Italije je to le vprašanje reševanja nerešenih primerov zahtevkov za pomoč, ki se nanašajo na pogodbe, sklenjene pred 31. marcem 2005, pri čemer to ne pomeni razširitve sheme, širjenja njenega področja uporabe ali spremembe njene temeljne sestave.
In support of this view, Italy cites the general principles of equal treatment, the need to give due consideration to the legitimate expectations of the beneficiaries and Court of Justice case law (judgments in Cases 223/85 [10] and C-364/90 [11]).
V podporo temu stališču Italija navaja splošna načela enakega obravnavanja, potrebo, da se ustrezno prouči načelo zaupanja v pravo, ki ga imajo upravičenci, in sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti (sodbi v zadevah 223/85 [10] in C-364/90 [11]).
Finally, Italy argues that the notified aid would not conflict with a decision of the World Trade Organisation which found that the TDM Regulation does not comply with WTO rules.
Nazadnje, Italija trdi, da priglašena pomoč ni v nasprotju z odločitvijo Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO), ki je ugotovila, da Uredba o začasnem obrambnem mehanizmu ni v skladu s pravili STO.
State aid classification
Opredelitev državne pomoči
As the measure is of a purely budgetary nature, its compatibility with the common market should be assessed by reference to the measures that it is intended to finance, i.e. to aid under the scheme.
Ker je ukrep popolnoma proračunske narave, je treba njegovo združljivost s skupnim trgom oceniti s sklicevanjem na ukrepe, ki jih namerava financirati, tj. na pomoč v skladu s shemo.
For the reasons set out in the Commission’s abovementioned letter of 19 May 2004, the scheme constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Na podlagi razlogov, navedenih v zgoraj navedenem dopisu Komisije z dne 19. maja 2004, shema pomeni državno pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
Under Article 1(c) of the Procedural Regulation and Article 4 of the Implementing Regulation, increases in the budget of an approved aid scheme constitute new aid if they exceed 20 % of the original budget.
V skladu s členom 1(c) Postopkovne uredbe in členom 4 Izvedbene uredbe pomeni povečanje proračuna odobrene sheme pomoči novo pomoč, če to presega 20 % prvotnega proračuna.
In the present case the notified increase corresponds to 100 % of the original budget and must consequently be assessed as new aid under Article 87 of the EC Treaty.
V tem primeru priglašeno povečanje ustreza 100 % prvotnega proračuna in ga je zato treba oceniti kot novo pomoč v skladu s členom 87 Pogodbe ES.
Italy’s objections in this respect do not change the Commission’s assessment.
Ugovori Italije v zvezi s tem ne spremenijo ocene Komisije.
In relation to the concept of new aid, which is covered by the notification obligation under Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty, the Commission applies the definitions set out in Article 1(c) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999.
V zvezi s konceptom nove pomoči, ki je zajet v obveznosti priglašanja v členu 88(3) Pogodbe ES, uporablja Komisija opredelitve iz člena 1(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999.