natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the above-mentioned judgment in Danske Busvognmænd, the Court of First Instance of the European Communities considered that ‘the contractual relationships established following a tender procedure between the transport undertaking and the competent authority include, by virtue of Article 14(1) and (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69, a specific financing scheme which leaves no room for compensation according to the methods laid down in Sections II, III and IV of that Regulation’ [25].(120) It emerges from this judgment that the concept of ‘public service compensation’ within the meaning of Article 17(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 must be interpreted in a very narrow manner.
V navedeni sodbi Danske Busvognmænd je Sodišče prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti menilo, da „…pogodbeni odnosi, ki nastanejo ob koncu postopka javnega razpisa med prevoznim podjetjem in pristojnim organom, na podlagi člena 14(1) in (2) Uredbe (EGS) št. 1191/69 vključujejo poseben sistem financiranja, ki ne dopušča nobenih nadomestil po metodah iz oddelkov II, III in IV te uredbe“ [25].(120) Iz te sodbe izhaja, da je treba pojem „nadomestilo za opravljanje javne službe“ v smislu člena 17(2) Uredbe (EGS) št. 1191/69 razlagati zelo ozko.
It therefore covers only compensation for public service obligations imposed unilaterally on an undertaking pursuant to Article 2 of the Regulation which are calculated using the method described in Articles 10 to 13 of the Regulation and which do not have to be notified to the Commission under the procedure provided for in Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty.
Ta pojem vključuje le obveznosti javnih služb, ki se podjetju naložijo enostransko na podlagi člena 2 Uredbe in se izračunajo na podlagi metode, opisane v členih od 10 do 13 Uredbe, ter jih ni treba priglasiti Komisiji v skladu s postopkom iz člena 88(3) Pogodbe ES.
However, payments provided for in a transport services contract based on public service oblligations within the meaning of Article 14 of Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 do not constitute compensation within the meaning of Article 17(2) of the Regulation.
Nasprotno pa plačila, določena s pogodbo o izvajanju javne službe v smislu člena 14 Uredbe (EGS) št. 1191/69, niso nadomestila v smislu člena 17(2) te uredbe.
Payments provided for in a transport services contract based on a public service contract within the meaning of Article 14 of Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69, such as in the contract between Verkehrsverbund Tirol and Postbus, are therefore not exempt from the notification requirement provided for in Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty.
Zato plačila, določena s pogodbo o izvajanju javne službe v smislu člena 14 Uredbe (EGS) št. 1191/69, kakršna je pogodba, ki sta jo sklenila Verkehrsverbund Tirol in družba Postbus, niso izvzeta iz obveznosti priglasitve, določene s členom 88(3) Pogodbe ES.
Their compatibility therefore has to be assessed by the Commission.
Zato mora Komisija oceniti združljivost.
Austria has unlawfully implemented the public service contract between Verkehrsverbund Tirol and Postbus which is the subject of this Decision in violation of Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
Ugotoviti je treba, da je Avstrija nezakonito izvedla pogodbo o izvajanju javne službe med Verkehrsverbund Tirol in družbo Postbus, na katero se nanaša ta odločba, in je zato kršila člen 88(3) Pogodbe.
However, the State aid provided for in that contract can be deemed compatible therewith on the basis of Article 73 of the EC Treaty,
Vendar je mogoče državno pomoč, določeno z navedeno pogodbo, razglasiti za združljivo na podlagi člena 73 Pogodbe ES –
The State aid granted by Austria to Postbus under the contract concluded on 12 July 2002 with Verkehrsverbund Tirol is compatible with the common market subject to the conditions and terms set out in Article 2.
Državna pomoč, ki jo Avstrija izvaja v korist družbe Postbus na podlagi pogodbe, ki je bila 12. julija 2002 sklenjena z Verkehrsverbund Tirol, je ob upoštevanju pogojev iz člena 2 združljiva s skupnim trgom.
Austria shall each year compare the compensation payment with the average costs as determined in the sector on the basis of the methods set out in section 3.3. of this Decision and shall demand repayment of any overcompensation paid.
Avstrija vsako leto na podlagi metod iz oddelka 3.3 te odločbe primerja nadomestila s povprečnimi stroški, ugotovljenimi v zadevnem sektorju, in zahteva vračilo kakršnega koli prekomernega nadomestila, ki bi bilo lahko ugotovljeno.
OJ C 162, 14.7.2007, p. 19.
UL C 162, 14.7.2007, str. 19.
Registered under Reference TREN (2002) A/63803.
Registriran je pod referenčno oznako TREN (2002) A/63803.
Registered under Reference TREN (2002) A/68846.
Registriran je pod referenčno oznako TREN (2002) A/68846.
Registered under Reference TREN (2005) D/113701.
Registriran je pod referenčno oznako TREN (2005) D/113701.
Registered under Reference TREN (2006) A/15295.
Registriran je pod referenčno oznako TREN (2006) A/15295.
Registered under Reference C (2007) 2209 final.
Registriran je pod referenčno oznako C(2007) 2209 konč.
Registered under Reference TREN (2007) A/38864.
Registriran je pod referenčno oznako TREN (2007) A/38864.
Registered under Reference TREN (2007) A/39395.
Registriran je pod referenčno oznako TREN (2007) A/39395.
These criteria have been established by the ECJ in its judgement of 24 July 2003, Altmark, case C-280/00, ECR I-7747 to assess whether a public service compensation constitutes State aid or not.
Ta merila je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti opredelilo v sodbi z dne 24. julija 2003 v zadevi Altmark (C-280/00, Recueil, str. I-7747), v kateri je odločalo, ali je nadomestilo za izvajanje javne službe državna pomoč ali ne.
For the explanations given by Austria in this regard at the stage of the preliminary assessment, see points 98 and 99 of the decision to initiate the procedure.
Za pojasnila, ki jih je dala Avstrija glede tega na stopnji predhodne ocene, glej točki 98 in 99 odločitve o sprožitvi postopka.
The figure of 21 km can be obtained by dividing the total number of kilometres by the number of driving hours: 1157568 km: 54290 hours = 21,32 km per hour.
Številko 21 km dobimo, če delimo skupno število kilometrov s številom ur vožnje: 1157568 km: 54290 ur = 21,32 km/h.
54290 hours × […] EUR/hour = […] EUR.
54290 ur × […] EUR/h = […] EUR.
EUR […] (all other costs per item) × […] % = EUR […].
[…] EUR (stroški na enoto) × […] % = […] EUR.
Case C 280/00, Altmark Trans [2003] ECR I-7747, as referred to above.
Sodba Sodišča v zadevi „Altmark Trans“ (C-280/00, Recueil I-7747).
Case C 280/00, Altmark Trans GmbH [2003] ECR I-7747, paragraphs 101, 106, 107, Regulation (EEC) No 1107/70 of the Council (OJ L 130, 15.6.1970, p. 1).
Sodba Sodišča v zadevi „Altmark Trans“ (C-280/00, Recueil I-7747), točke 101, 106 in 107. Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 1107/70 ( UL L 130, 15.6.1970, str. 1).
Case T-157/01 Danske Busvognmænd, ECR [2004] II-917, points 77 to 79.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 16. marca 2004 v zadevi Danske Busvognmænd (T-157/01, Recueil II-917, točke 77–79).
This amount is composed as follows: the 2002 Austrian collective agreement for employees in private-law governed bus undertakings provided for a net average hourly rate of EUR 7,55. To this amount, one has to add as a first step surcharges for Sunday and holiday work; overtime payment; taxes and social security.
Z avstrijsko kolektivno pogodbo iz leta 2002 za zaposlene v zasebnopravnih avtobusnih podjetjih je določena povprečna neto urna postavka v višini 7,55 EUR. K temu znesku je treba najprej prišteti dodatke za nedeljsko in praznično delo ter plačilo nadur, davkov in prispevkov za socialno varnost.
Maintenance costs are estimated at EUR […] per bus (personnel and material costs), totalling EUR […] for 25 buses.
Predvideni stroški vzdrževanja znašajo […] EUR na avtobus (stroški dela in materialni stroški), tj. skupaj […] EUR za 25 avtobusov.
The costs for fuel and maintenance together equal EUR […].
Stroški goriva in vzdrževanja skupaj znašajo […] EUR.
Verkehrsverbund Tirol based the calculation of driver costs on 28 drivers which, according to Austria, is a low base figure for 25 buses, if holidays, non-working periods due to sick leave etc. are taken into account.
Verkehrsverbund Tirol je kot osnovo za izračun stroškov za voznika upošteval 28 voznikov, kar je po mnenju Avstrije – ob upoštevanju dopusta, nedejavnih obdobij zaradi bolniške odsotnosti itd. – nizka osnova za 25 avtobusov.
Although the Austrian collective agreement for employees in private-law governed bus undertakings provides for an annual gross wage of EUR […] (without any surcharges or taxes), Verkehrsverbund Tirol assumed only EUR […]. Hence, the personnel costs amount to EUR […].
Čeprav je z avstrijsko kolektivno pogodbo za zaposlene v zasebnopravnih avtobusnih podjetjih predvidena letna bruto plača v višini […] EUR (brez kakršnih koli dodatkov ali davkov), je Verkehrsverbund Tirol predvidel le […] EUR. Stroški dela torej znašajo […] EUR.
Concerning the other personnel costs for the personnel in administration, planning and garage services, Verkehrsverbund Tirol assumed an annual gross wage of EUR […] per employee.
Kar zadeva druge stroške dela za upravno osebje ter razpolaganje in garažne storitve, je Verkehrsverbund Tirol prav tako predpostavil, da bo letna bruto plača znašala […] EUR na zaposlenega.
The number of employees was set at 8.
Predvideno je bilo, da bo zaposlenih osem oseb.
Austria stated that the gross hourly rate for a driving hour (including all duties, taxes, garage, maintenance, administration and additional personnel costs) is valued at EUR […].
Avstrija je navedla, da je bruto urna postavka za uro vožnje (skupaj z dajatvami in davki ter stroški garažiranja, vzdrževanja, upravljanja in dodatnega osebja) ocenjena na […] EUR. Ta znesek je sestavljen na podlagi spodaj navedenega.
Any undertaking which intends to discontinue or make substantial modifications to a transport service which it provides to the public on a continuous and regular basis and which is not covered by the contract system or the public service obligation shall notify the competent authorities of the Member State thereof at least three months in advance. The competent authorities may decide to waive such notification.
Vsako podjetje, ki namerava ustaviti ali bistveno dopolniti prevozno storitev, ki jo izvaja za javnost neprekinjeno in redno ter ni vključena v pogodbeni sistem ali v obveznost javne službe, o tem obvesti pristojne organe države članice vsaj tri mesece vnaprej.
See the Court judgment in Case C 280/00, Altmark Trans, concerning a German public service contract [2003] ECR I-7747. This did not prevent the Court from assessing whether or not aid was involved on the basis of the content and not the type of instrument; See also Article 4 of Commission Decision 2005/842/EC of 28 November 2005 on the application of Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest (OJ L 312, 29.11.2005, p. 67), which also disregards the type of instrument.
Glede tega glej sodbo Sodišča v zadevi Altmark Trans (C-280/00, Recueil I-7747), ki je zadevala nemško pogodbo o izvajanju javne službe, vendar se Sodišče zaradi tega ni odpovedalo analizi vprašanja, ali gre za pomoč ali ne, na podlagi vsebine pogodbe, in ne oblike zadevnega instrumenta; glej člen 4 Odločbe Komisije 2005/842/ES z dne 28. novembra 2005 o uporabi člena 86(2) Pogodbe ES za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, dodeljene nekaterim podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena (UL L 312, 29.11.2005, str. 67), ki prav tako zaobide obliko instrumenta.
Part X(2) fixes the payment for the Bestandsleistungen at EUR 1690000 for the year 2002. Part X(3) provides that this remuneration is made up as follows:
V delu X(2) je za leto 2002 za Bestandsleistungen določeno plačilo v višini 1690000 EUR. V delu X(3) je določeno, da je navedeno plačilo sestavljeno iz:
of 20 November 2009
z dne 20. novembra 2009
Annex X/01 to that decision lists the codes for the veterinary regions in Germany.
V Prilogi X/01 k navedeni odločbi so navedene kode za veterinarske regije v Nemčiji.
Germany has adjusted the names and boundaries of their veterinary regions.
Nemčija je prilagodila imena in meje svojih veterinarskih regij.
It is therefore appropriate to amend Annex X/01 to Decision 2005/176/EC accordingly.
Zato je primerno, da se Priloga X/01 k Odločbi 2005/176/ES ustrezno spremeni.
Annex X/01 to Decision 2005/176/EC is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga X/01 k Odločbi 2005/176/ES se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge k tej odločbi.
Done at Brussels, 20 November 2009.
V Bruslju, 20. novembra 2009
on measures C 20/07 (ex NN 31/07) implemented by Spain in favour of Pickman
o ukrepih št. C 20/07 (ex NN 31/07) Španije za podjetje Pickman
Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 62(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru in zlasti člena 62(1) Sporazuma,
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments [1] pursuant to the article cited above and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe [1] v skladu z navedenim členom, in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
Following allegations made by a complainant by letter registered on 5 April 2006 that the Spanish authorities had granted State aid to Pickman — La Cartuja de Sevilla SA (hereinafter ‘Pickman’ or ‘the company’), the European Commission (hereinafter ‘the Commission’) requested information from the Spanish authorities by letters dated 12 April 2006 and 12 February 2007, to which the Spanish authorities replied by letters registered on 7 June 2006, 30 August 2006 and 18 April 2007.
Zaradi obtožb, ki jih je pritožnik navedel v dopisu, evidentiranem 5. aprila 2006, da so španski organi dodelili državno pomoč podjetju Pickman — La Cartuja de Sevilla S.A. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Pickman/podjetje), je Evropska komisija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Komisija) v dopisih z dne 12. aprila 2006 in 12. februarja 2007 zaprosila španske organe, naj predložijo informacije; španski organi so odgovorili z dopisi, evidentiranimi 7. junija 2006, 30. avgusta 2006 in 18. aprila 2007.
On 27 June 2007, the Commission informed the Spanish authorities that it had decided to initiate proceedings and received their comments by letters of 15 September 2007 and 26 November 2007.
Komisija je 27. junija 2007 španske organe obvestila, da se je odločila sprožiti postopek, pri čemer je njihove pripombe prejela v dopisih z dne 15. septembra 2007 in 26. novembra 2007.
Following the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union on 10 October 2007 of the Decision to initiate proceedings pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (hereinafter ‘the opening Decision’), in which it invited the interested parties to submit their comments, the Commission received comments from the aid beneficiary, by letters registered on 26 November 2007 and 7 April 2008.
Po objavi odločitve o sprožitvi postopka v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe (v nadaljnjem besedilu: uvodna odločitev) v Uradnem listu Evropske unije10. oktobra 2007, v kateri je zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj predložijo svoje pripombe, je Komisija v dopisih, evidentiranih 26. novembra 2007 in 7. aprila 2008, prejela pripombe upravičenca do pomoči.
On 12 February 2008 and 11 April 2008, these comments were forwarded to the Spanish authorities, who replied on 2 April 2008.
Te pripombe so bile 12. februarja 2008 in 11. aprila 2008 poslane španskim organom, ki so odgovorili z dopisom z dne 2. aprila 2008.
No observations from third parties were received.
Komisija ni prejela nobenih pripomb tretjih oseb.
Pickman is a producer of dishes and chinaware established in Seville since 1841.
Podjetje Pickman, ki ima od leta 1841 sedež v Sevilli, je proizvajalec posode in porcelana.
The company has traditionally focused on the production of high-range artisanal products, and their direct marketing to hotels, restaurants and catering companies or through collaborating retail outlets.
Podjetje se je običajno osredotočalo na proizvodnjo umetnoobrtnih izdelkov visoke kakovosti ter njihovo neposredno trženje hotelom, restavracijam ter podjetjem za pripravo in dostavo hrane ali prek sodelujočih maloprodajnih mest.
Recently, it has diversified its activities into the market of corporate gifts and hostelry.
Podjetje je nedavno razširilo svoje dejavnosti na trge za poslovna darila in hotelirstvo.
Pickman currently employs some 140 workers, and in 2005 its turnover was EUR 4,28 million. It must therefore be regarded as a medium-sized enterprise [2].
Podjetje Pickman zaposluje zdaj okoli 140 delavcev, njegov promet pa je leta 2005 znašal 4,28 milijona EUR. Zato se šteje za srednje veliko podjetje [2].
Pickman operates in the ceramics market, which as a whole records total sales of approximately EUR 26 billion, estimated to constitute one third of total global production, and employs 222000 people.
Podjetje Pickman deluje na trgu keramike, na katerem se proda skupno za približno 26 milijard EUR izdelkov ter ki po ocenah predstavlja eno tretjino svetovne proizvodnje keramike in zaposluje 222000 ljudi.
More specifically, the segment of that market defined as ‘table and ornamental ware’ has certain specific characteristics, namely being very labour-intensive, closely linked to the end-consumer and manifesting a great need to compete on design and quality.
Del tega trga, ki je opredeljen kot trg za „namizni pribor in okrasje“, ima nekatere posebne lastnosti, in sicer je zelo delovno intenziven, tesno povezan s končnim potrošnikom ter potrebuje konkurenco v zvezi z oblikovanjem in kakovostjo.
This market is open to intra-Community trade, where the United Kingdom and Germany are the main producing and consuming countries, while Spain’s share is less than 5 %, and there is competition between manufacturers.
Ta trg je odprt za trgovanje znotraj Skupnosti, pri čemer sta Združeno kraljestvo in Nemčija glavni državi proizvajalki in porabnici, medtem ko je delež Španije manj kot 5-odstoten, med proizvajalci pa obstaja konkurenca.
At national level, there are 11 companies active in Spain, with some 3000 workers and a total annual sales volume of 60 million items with a total annual value of EUR 84 million [3].
Na nacionalni ravni je v Španiji dejavnih 11 podjetij, ki zaposlujejo približno 3000 delavcev, na leto pa se proda skupno 60 milijonov izdelkov, kar znaša skupaj 84 milijonov EUR na leto [3].
The measures forming the subject matter of the opening Decision are the following [4]:
Ukrepi, ki jih zadeva uvodna odločitev, so [4]:
Measure 2: a waiver of Pickman’s Social Security debt of EUR 3,29 million by means of a special agreement concluded on 11 April 2000 which differed from the general agreement for creditors,
ukrep 2: odpis 3,29 milijona EUR dolga podjetja Pickman za socialno varnost s posebnim sporazumom, sklenjenim 11. aprila 2000, ki se je razlikoval od splošnega sporazuma za upnike,
Measures 3 to 6: a series of participation loans totalling EUR 1,87 million and subsidies intended for tangible and intangible investments totalling EUR 2,59 million provided for in a restructuring plan submitted by Pickman to the Junta de Andalucía [Regional Government of Andalusia], which approved it on 2 March 2004 as detailed in paragraphs 50, 51 and 52 of the opening Decision,
ukrepi 3 do 6: niz sindiciranih posojil v skupni vrednosti 1,87 milijona EUR ter subvencije za opredmetene in neopredmetene naložbe v skupni vrednosti 2,59 milijona EUR, predvidene v načrtu za prestrukturiranje, ki ga je podjetje Pickman predložilo regionalni vladi Andaluzije (Junta de Andalucía), pri čemer ga ja ta odobrila 2. marca 2004, kot je podrobneje navedeno v odstavkih 50, 51 in 52 uvodne odločitve,
Measure 7: a guarantee granted by the Agencia de Innovación y Desarrollo de Andalucía [Andalusian Innovation and Development Agency] (hereinafter ‘IDEA’), covering EUR 1,3 million, i.e. 80 % of a EUR 1,65 million loan negotiated by Pickman with a bank and concluded by the parties on 28 December 2005.
ukrep 7: poroštvo, ki ga je odobrila Andaluzijska agencija za inovacije in razvoj (Agencia de Innovación y Desarrollo de Andalucía) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: IDEA) in znaša 1,3 milijona EUR, kar je 80 % posojila v vrednosti 1,65 milijona EUR, o katerem se je podjetje Pickman 28. decembra 2005 dogovorilo z banko.
The guarantee has not been enforced.
Poroštvo ni bilo uveljavljeno.
In the opening Decision, the Commission’s interim conclusion was that measures 2 to 7 might constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Komisija je v uvodni odločitvi sprejela vmesni sklep, da ukrepi 2 do 7 morda pomenijo državno pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
As the primary objective of the measures appeared to be to assist a company in difficulty, the Commission took the view that the Community Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty [5] (hereinafter ‘the 2004 Guidelines’) applied, since measure 7, in the event that it were to constitute State aid, was adopted after those guidelines entered into force.
Ker se je zdelo, da je glavni cilj ukrepov pomoč podjetju v težavah, je Komisija menila, da se za zadevo uporabljajo Smernice Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah [5] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Smernice za reševanje in prestrukturiranje iz leta 2004), saj je bil ukrep 7, če pomeni državno pomoč, sprejet po začetku veljavnosti teh smernic.
In particular, the Commission’s preliminary assessment was that:
Predhodna ocena Komisije je bila zlasti, da:
the measures cannot be regarded as rescue aid, taking into account both their form and their duration,
ukrepov ni mogoče šteti za pomoč za reševanje ob upoštevanju njihove oblike in trajanja,
Pickman could have benefited from restructuring aid but, in the absence of a restructuring plan, it would not be possible to assess whether the measure would restore the company’s long-term viability.
bi lahko podjetje Pickman izkoristilo pomoč za prestrukturiranje, vendar brez načrta za prestrukturiranje ne bi bilo mogoče oceniti, ali bi ukrep obnovil dolgoročno sposobnost podjetja za preživetje.
On the basis of the information available, the Commission decided to initiate the formal investigation procedure in order to allay its doubts both as to the nature of the measures at issue as State aid and their compatibility with the common market.
Na podlagi informacij, ki so bile na voljo, se je Komisija odločila sprožiti formalni postopek preiskave, da odpravi dvome o značilnostih zadevnih ukrepov z vidika državne pomoči in o njihovi združljivosti s skupnim trgom.
After being informed of the opening Decision, the Spanish authorities sent the following observations on the individual measures at issue.
Ko so bili španski organi obveščeni o uvodni odločitvi, so poslali naslednje pripombe glede posameznih zadevnih ukrepov.
Measure 2: Waiver of debt to the Tesorería de la Seguridad Social [Social Security Treasury]
Ukrep 2: odpis dolga organu socialne varnosti (Tesorería de la Seguridad Social)
As regards measure 2, the Spanish authorities point out that the Social Security Treasury, as a preferential creditor, took priority over ordinary creditors, being ranked immediately after creditors with guarantees and debts owed to the company’s staff.
Glede ukrepa 2 španski organi poudarjajo, da ima organ socialne varnosti kot prednostni upnik prednost pred navadnimi upniki, ker je razvrščen neposredno za upniki s poroštvi in dolgovi do delavcev podjetja.