natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Reference is made to comments made under recital 55.
Sklicuje se tudi na pripombe iz uvodne izjave 55.
The general methodology used to calculate dumping (set out in recitals 31 to 46 above) has been applied to all exporting producers in Turkey.
Splošna metodologija za izračun dampinga (določena v zgornjih uvodnih izjavah 31 do 46), se je uporabljala za vse proizvajalce izvoznike v Turčiji.
It differs from the methodology applied in the original investigation, which was used exceptionally for some exporters due to significant currency fluctuations during the original investigation period.
Razlikuje se od metodologije iz prvotne preiskave, ki se je izjemoma uporabljala za nekatere izvoznike zaradi znatnih tečajnih nihanj med obdobjem prvotne preiskave.
Due to these fluctuations, it was considered more appropriate in the original investigation to make a comparison between the monthly weighted average normal value and the monthly weighted average export price.
Zaradi teh nihanj je bilo v prvotni preiskavi primerneje primerjati mesečno tehtano povprečno normalno vrednost in mesečno tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno.
However, these exceptional circumstances were absent in the current investigation and the standard methodology, as described in recitals 31 to 46 above, was applied instead.
Vendar teh izjemnih okoliščin v sedanji preiskavi ni bilo, zato je bila uporabljena standardna metodologija, kot je opisano v zgornjih uvodnih izjavah 31 do 46.
Thus, in the current investigation, the dumping margin for the exporting producers in Turkey was established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with a weighted average export price.
V sedanji preiskavi je bila stopnja dampinga za proizvajalce izvoznike v Turčiji torej določena na podlagi primerjave med tehtano povprečno normalno vrednostjo in tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno.
The following companies: Cayirova Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret AS, Istanbul, Yücel Boru ve Profil Endüstrisi AS, Istanbul, and Noksel Çelik Boru Sanayi AȘ, Ankara, each of whose individual dumping margin in the original investigation was zero, were initially investigated in the review and chosen as part of the sample.
Družbe Cayirova Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret AS, Istanbul, Yücel Boru ve Profil Endüstrisi AS, Istanbul in Noksel Çelik Boru Sanayi AȘ, Ankara, katerih individualna stopnja dampinga je bila pri prvotni preiskavi nič, so bile prvotno preiskane med pregledom in izbrane kot del vzorca.
However, although Article 9(3) of the basic Regulation provides that companies with a zero or de minimis margin in the original investigation may be included in a review, it does not oblige the Community institutions to include such companies.
Čeprav člen 9(3) osnovne uredbe določa, da se lahko družbe z nično ali de minimis stopnjo dampinga pri prvotni preiskavi vključijo v pregled, institucij Skupnosti ne zavezuje, da vključijo takšne družbe.
Moreover, after the adoption of the basic Regulation, in the case Mexico-Beef and Rice, the WTO dispute settlement body has interpreted the relevant provision of the ADA as prohibiting reviews of such companies.
Poleg tega je po sprejetju osnovne uredbe v primeru mehiške govedine in riža (Mexico-Beef and Rice) Organ STO za reševanje sporov obravnaval ustrezno določbo protidampinškega sporazuma ADA kot prepoved pregledov takih družb.
Therefore, the Community institutions concluded that it is appropriate not to use data gathered during the review concerning these three companies.
Zato so institucije Skupnosti sklenile, da je primerno, da se podatki, zbrani med pregledom glede teh treh družb, ne uporabijo.
Consequently, these companies were excluded from the sample.
Posledično so bile te družbe izključene iz vzorca.
Moreover, in this Regulation, it is assumed that none of these companies are currently engaged in dumping.
Poleg tega se na podlagi te uredbe sklepa, da nobena od teh družb zdaj ne izvaja dampinga.
Sampling forms were sent out to 15 potential producers/exporters in Turkey and 8 of them responded.
Obrazci za vzorčenje so bili poslani 15 potencialnim proizvajalcem/izvoznikom v Turčiji, od katerih se jih je odzvalo osem.
Three companies/groups, which account for 41 % of the total Turkish imports into the Community, were selected for the sample.
Za vzorec so bile izbrane tri družbe/skupine, ki pomenijo 41 % skupnega turškega uvoza v Skupnost.
As mentioned above the normal value was either constructed or established on the basis of prices paid or payable, in the ordinary course of trade, by independent customers in Turkey.
Kot je bilo navedeno, se je normalna vrednost konstruirala ali določila na podlagi cen, ki so jih neodvisne stranke v Turčiji plačale ali jih plačujejo v okviru običajnega poteka trgovine.
Some of the adjustments claimed by the exporting producers have been rejected or amended.
Nekatere prilagoditve, ki so jih zahtevali proizvajalci izvozniki, so bile zavrnjene ali spremenjene.
Credit costs
Stroški kredita
Following the disclosure of the Commission's findings some of the exporters claimed that credit costs should be established on the basis of the actual payment terms agreed between the producers and their customers.
Po razkritju ugotovitev Komisije so nekateri izvozniki trdili, da je treba stroške kredita določiti na podlagi dejanskih pogojev plačila, dogovorjenih med proizvajalci in njihovimi strankami.
These claims were accepted.
Te trditve so bile sprejete.
Duty drawback
Povračilo dajatve
Certain companies claimed an allowance for duty drawbacks on the grounds that import charges were levied on the raw material used for the like product when intended for consumption in Turkey but were refunded when the product was sold for export to the Community.
Nekatere družbe so vložile popravek za prilagoditev dajatve na podlagi tega, da so uvozne dajatve šle v breme surovin za podobni izdelek, če je bil namenjen za potrošnjo v Turčiji, te pa so bile povrnjene, če je bil izdelek prodan za izvoz v Skupnost.
In one case, the amount claimed was found to be higher than the amount of duty levied on materials physically incorporated in the like product sold in the domestic market.
V enem primeru je bilo ugotovljeno, da je navedeni znesek višji od zneska dajatve, ki gre v breme materiala, fizično vgrajenega v podobni izdelek, ki se prodaja na domačem trgu.
It was established that the duty burden was less because that company/group of companies used in their domestic production not only coils imported with a duty but also coils imported with 0 % duty rate, as well as locally purchased coils.
Ugotovilo se je, da je bilo breme dajatve manjše, ker družba/skupina družb v domači proizvodnji ni uporabljala le tuljav, uvoženih z dajatvijo, ampak tudi tuljave, uvožene z 0-odstotno stopnjo dajatev, ter tuljave, kupljene na domačem trgu.
Consequently, the allowances were adjusted accordingly.
Zato so bile izvedene ustrezne prilagoditve.
Another company for which the allowance was originally rejected claimed that it should have been allowed as their domestically sold products did bear the burden of the duty.
Druga družba, za katero je bil popravek prvotno zavrnjen, je trdila, da bi popravek moral biti odobren, saj se je za izdelke, prodane na domačem trgu, zaračunavala dajatev.
The claim was partly accepted.
Trditev je bila delno sprejeta.
In this context, it was claimed by the Community industry that this would be a countervailable subsidy.
V zvezi s tem je industrija Skupnosti trdila, da bi bila to subvencija, proti kateri se lahko uvede izravnalni ukrep.
However, it has to be noted that the present proceeding is an anti-dumping investigation.
Vendar je treba poudariti, da je sedanji postopek protidampinška preiskava.
Therefore, this allegation has not been analysed.
Zato se ta obtožba ni analizirala.
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A)
Prodajni, splošni in administrativni stroški (PSA)
One of the Turkish exporters, for those of its sales for which the normal value had to be constructed, claimed negative SG&A.
Eden od turških izvoznikov, za čigar prodajo je bilo treba konstruirati normalno vrednost, je uveljavljal negativne stroške PSA.
This was due to the fact that their foreign currency exchange gains were substantial and higher than the total amount of SG&A.
Do tega je prišlo zaradi dejstva, ker je bil dobiček od pretvorbe menjalnih tečajev znaten in višji od skupnega zneska PSA.
In this case those financial gains were disregarded.
V tem primeru se ta finančni dobiček ni upošteval.
Only financial costs related to the companies' loans were taken into account.
Upoštevali so se le finančni stroški, povezani s posojili podjetij.
The SG&A were thus adjusted accordingly.
Zato so se stroški PSA ustrezno prilagodili.
Thus, for all exporters, the export price was based on the prices paid or payable by unrelated customers in the Community, pursuant to Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Tako je izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe za vse izvoznike temeljila na cenah, ki so jih plačale ali jih plačujejo nepovezane stranke v Skupnosti.
Accordingly, adjustments were made for rebates, discounts, transport, handling, charging costs, bank charges and insurance and credit costs, where appropriate and supported by verified evidence.
Glede na to so bile prilagoditve izvedene za rabate, popuste, prevoz, rokovanje, zaračunavanje stroškov, bančne stroške in zavarovanje ter stroške kredita, kjer je bilo to ustrezno in podprto s preverjenimi dokazi.
The dumping margin for the exporting producers in Turkey was established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with a weighted average export price, in accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe je bila za proizvajalce izvoznike v Turčiji določena stopnja dampinga na podlagi primerjave med tehtano povprečno normalno vrednostjo in tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno.
The comparison of weighted average export prices with a weighted average normal value showed the following dumping margins:
Primerjava med tehtanimi povprečnimi izvoznimi cenami in tehtano povprečno normalno vrednostjo je pokazala, da obstajajo naslednje stopnje dampinga:
Erbosan Erciyas Boru Sanayii ve Ticaret AȘ, Kayseri (‘Erbosan’) 0,5 %,
Erbosan Erciyas Boru Sanayii ve Ticaret AȘ, Kayseri („Erbosan“) 0,5 %,
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ, Istanbul (‘Borusan’) 1,4 %,
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ, Istanbul („Borusan“) 1,4 %,
Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi AS, Iskenderun (‘Toscelik’) 0,9 %.
Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi AS, Iskenderun („Toscelik“) 0,9 %.
Two companies declared their intention to cooperate but were not included in the sample.
Dve družbi sta izrazili namero o sodelovanju, vendar nista bili vključeni v vzorec.
Given that the dumping margins determined for all the companies in the sample were de minimis and the cooperation in the investigation was very high, the countrywide dumping margin was also considered to be de minimis.
Ker so bile stopnje dampinga, določene za vse družbe iz vzorca, de minimis, raven sodelovanja v preiskavi pa je bila zelo visoka, se je stopnja dampinga na ravni države tudi štela za de minimis.
Therefore, it is concluded that there was no continuation of dumping in case of Turkey.
Zato se sklene, da v primeru Turčije ni šlo za nadaljevanje dampinga.
The further analysis in the framework of Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation will therefore solely concentrate on the likelihood of recurrence of dumping.
Nadaljnja analiza v okviru člena 11(3) osnovne uredbe bo zato osredotočena samo na verjetnost ponovitve dampinga.
Likelihood analysis
Analiza verjetnosti
The EU market is undeniably a very attractive market for the Turkish producers.
Trg EU je nedvomno zelo privlačen za turške proizvajalce.
This is due to a number of factors, the first of which is size.
Na to vpliva več dejavnikov, prvi je velikost.
Size pertains not only to the large consumption, but also to the fact that most Turkish exports to other third country markets are fragmented — i.e. small quantities being shipped to many different destinations.
Velikost se ne nanaša le na veliko potrošnjo, ampak tudi na dejstvo, da je večina turškega izvoza na druge trge tretjih držav razdrobljena, kar pomeni, da se majhne količine pošljejo v več različnih namembnih krajev.
In that sense the Community is more attractive as a single destination with large absorption capacity.
V tem smislu je Skupnost bolj privlačna namembni kraj z veliko absorpcijsko sposobnostjo.
Geographical proximity is another important factor, as transportation costs for these products are not insignificant.
Geografska bližina je drug pomemben dejavnik, saj stroški prevoza teh izdelkov niso majhni.
The Community is also a traditional market for Turkish exporters who have well established distribution channels and a wide range of clients.
Skupnost je tudi tradicionalni trg za turške izvoznike, ki imajo dobro razvite distribucijske poti in velik razpon strank.
Share of exports to the EU and pricing practices
Delež izvoza v EU in prakse oblikovanja cen
Despite the measures in force exports from Turkey continued throughout the IP.
Kljub veljavnim ukrepom se je izvoz iz Turčije nadaljeval skozi celotno OP.
However, no dumping was found for any of the sampled companies.
Vendar damping ni bil ugotovljen za nobeno od vzorčenih družb.
It should be noted that the sampled companies and the non-sampled companies that cooperated in the current reviews as well as those whose margin in the original investigation was found to be zero or de minimis cover around 90 % of total Turkish exports to the Community.
Treba je poudariti, da vzorčene družbe ter nevzorčene družbe, ki so sodelovale v sedanjih pregledih, in družbe, katerih stopnja v prvotni preiskavi je bila nič ali de minimis, pokrivajo približno 90 % celotnega turškega izvoza v Skupnost.
The market for these Turkish exports appears to be stable and there is no indication that the companies would change their pricing strategies.
Trg za ta turški izvoz se zdi stabilen in nič ne kaže na to, da bi te družbe spreminjale svoje strategije oblikovanja cen.
Furthermore, the three sampled companies as well as those three whose dumping margin in the original investigation was found to be zero or de minimis are by far the biggest players on the market and price leaders.
Poleg tega so tri vzorčene družbe in družbe, katerih stopnja dampinga je bila v prvotni preiskavi nič ali de minimis, daleč najpomembnejši akterji na trgu in odločilno vplivajo na cene.
Therefore, it is likely that any other company would rather follow their pricing practices.
Zato je verjetno, da bi se katera koli druga družba zgledovala po njihovih praksah oblikovanja cen.
It thus appears unlikely that dumping would recur for Turkey.
Zdi se torej neverjetno, da bi se damping za Turčijo ponovil.
Nevertheless, for the sake of completeness, the factors below were also examined.
Kljub temu so bili zaradi popolnosti preučeni tudi spodnji dejavniki.
Unused capacity in Turkey
Neizkoriščene zmogljivosti v Turčiji
The investigation established a total spare capacity of about 143000 tonnes in the IP for the cooperating producers, including sampled and non-sampled companies.
Na podlagi preiskave je bila med OP za sodelujoče proizvajalce, vključno z vzorčenimi in nevzorčenimi družbami, ugotovljena skupna neizkoriščena zmogljivost približno 143000 ton.
This quantity would correspond to around 10 % of the total Community consumption (as defined in recital 231) of welded tubes.
Ta količina bi ustrezala približno 10 % celotne potrošnje varjenih cevi v Skupnosti (kot je določeno v uvodni izjavi 231).
Possible absorption capacity of third country markets
Možna absorpcijska sposobnost trgov tretjih držav
The largest third-country market for the product concerned (the USA) has antidumping measures in place for Turkish exports ranging up to 14,7 %.
Največji trg tretje države za zadevni izdelek (ZDA) izvaja protidampinške ukrepe, ki veljajo za turški izvoz v razponu do 14,7 %.
This would imply that, other things being equal, the USA would not be likely to absorb significant additional export quantities from Turkey.
To bi pomenilo, da ZDA pod enakimi pogoji verjetno ne bi absorbirala veliko dodatnih izvoznih količin iz Turčije.
However, the fact that the exports to third countries are fragmented with shipments to many different destinations appears to indicate that the Turkish exporters are actively in the process of exploring new markets, and it is therefore not unlikely that third country markets could absorb some of the capacities.
Vendar dejstvo, da je izvoz v tretje države razdrobljen na pošiljke mnogim različnim namembnim krajem, kaže na to, da turški izvozniki aktivno raziskujejo nove trge, zato ni neverjetno, da bi trgi tretjih držav lahko absorbirali določene zmogljivosti.
In addition, taking into account the actual ratio of Turkish exports to the Community and to third countries (70/30), the same ratio can reasonably be expected if the currently unused capacities were sold.
Poleg tega je ob upoštevanju dejanskega razmerja turškega izvoza v Skupnost in v tretje države (70/30) razumno pričakovati isto razmerje, če bi se sedanje neizkoriščene zmogljivosti prodale.
This would then amount to an additional import into the Community of around 100000 tonnes, which would correspond to an additional market share of 7 %, based on the IP consumption figures.
To bi pomenilo, da bi bilo v Skupnost dodatno uvoženih približno 100000 ton, kar bi glede na podatke o potrošnji med OP ustrezalo dodatnemu tržnemu deležu 7 %.
It has to be noted, however, that this would be the maximum theoretical increase of sales based on the assumption that the spare capacity is used at the rate of 100 %, which is rare in such industry.
Vendar je treba poudariti, da bi bilo to največje teoretično povečanje prodaje ob predpostavki, da se neizkoriščena zmogljivost porabi 100-odstotno, kar se v tej industriji dogaja redko.
Price factors
Dejavniki cen
The price differences between Turkish exports to the Community and to third countries have not been significant and depended on the company concerned.
Razlike v cenah med turškim izvozom v Skupnost in v tretje države niso bile velike in so bile odvisne od zadevne družbe.
After further analysis subsequent to the disclosure, it was established that the Turkish export prices to third countries were slightly higher than those to the Community.
Po nadaljnji analizi, ki je sledila razkritju, je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile turške izvozne cene za tretje države malenkost višje kot za Skupnost.
Given that no dumping was established for Turkey in respect of their exports to the Community, it can be assumed that generally exports to third countries were not made at dumped prices.
Ker za Turčijo v zvezi z izvozom v Skupnost ni bil ugotovljen damping, je mogoče domnevati, da izvoz v tretje države na splošno ni potekal po dampinških cenah.
There are also no other indications that Turkish exporters would change their price strategy.
Ravno tako nič ne kaže na to, da bi turški izvozniki spremenili svojo strategijo oblikovanja cen.
Nothing in the circumstances of the market or the situation of the exporters as a whole showed that they were likely to change their overall market behaviour.
Nobene druge razmere na trgu ali stanje izvoznikov v celoti niso kazali na to, da so izvozniki nameravali spremeniti splošno tržno obnašanje.
In view of the foregoing it is concluded that dumping is not likely to recur for imports originating in Turkey.
Na podlagi navedenega se sklene, da se damping v zvezi z uvozom iz Turčije verjetno ne bo ponovil.
TURKEY (ii): ARTICLE 11(3) ASPECTS
TURČIJA (ii): VIDIKI ČLENA 11(3)
The complainant claimed that the measures in force did not prevent the continuation of dumped imports and that the level of measures was no longer sufficient to counteract the injurious dumping by imports of the product concerned from Turkey.
Pritožnik je trdil, da veljavni ukrepi niso preprečili nadaljevanja dampinškega uvoza in da raven ukrepov ni več zadostovala za preprečitev škodljivega dampinga v zvezi z uvozom zadevnega izdelka iz Turčije.
As found above, imports from Turkey no longer continued to be made at dumped prices.
Kot je ugotovljeno zgoraj, se uvoz iz Turčije ni več nadaljeval po dampinških cenah.
Indeed, all levels of dumping established in the present investigation are below the de minimis threshold.
Vse stopnje dampinga, ugotovljene v sedanji preiskavi, so dejansko pod pragom de minimis.
In particular, this is true for three companies, which originally were found to be dumping.
Zlasti to velja za tri družbe, za katere je bil prvotno ugotovljen damping.
The Community market will, as mentioned, most likely remain an attractive market for the Turkish exporters in terms of prices as well as well-established and long-lasting commercial relations.
Trg Skupnosti bo, kot je omenjeno, najverjetneje ostal privlačen trg za turške izvoznike glede na cene ter dobro razvite in dolgotrajne trgovinske odnose.
At the same time, Turkish producers sell significant volumes on their domestic market.
Turški proizvajalci hkrati prodajajo ogromne količine na domačem trgu.
These quantities are sold at competitive and relatively low prices, when compared to other major markets, including the EU and USA.
Te količine se prodajajo po konkurenčnih in relativno nizkih cenah, če jih primerjamo z drugimi velikimi trgi, vključno z EU in ZDA.
Indeed, domestic prices and subsequently normal values were at such levels that dumping in respect to exports to the Community has disappeared entirely.
Domače cene in posledično normalne vrednosti so bile dejansko na takšnih ravneh, da je damping v zvezi z izvozom v Skupnost v celoti izginil.
The investigation has not detected any other circumstances which would suggest that the price and dumping are likely to change if measures are allowed to lapse.
S preiskavo niso bile odkrite nobene druge razmere, ki bi nakazovale, da se bosta cena in damping verjetno spremenila, če se bo dovolilo prenehanje ukrepov.
For the companies that have been subject to zero-duties since the original investigation, the considerations based on the Mexico Beef and Rice report, as explained above in recital 143 will continue to apply.
Za družbe, za katere so se od prvotne preiskave uporabljale dajatve nič, bodo premisleki na podlagi poročila Mexico Beef and Rice, kot so obrazloženi v uvodni izjavi 143, veljali še naprej.
As regards the other companies, the present investigation indeed showed that circumstances have changed, as they were found not be dumping any more.
V zvezi z drugimi družbami je sedanja preiskava dejansko pokazala, da so se razmere spremenile, saj je bilo ugotovljeno, da več ne izvajajo dampinga.
In addition, no compelling reasons are at hand that would indicate that such changed circumstances are not of a lasting nature.
Poleg tega ni nobenih prepričljivih razlogov, ki bi kazali na to, da takšne spremenjene razmere niso trajne.
Moreover, all investigated companies made exports to third countries in 2006 and the IP at prices higher than export prices to the Community.
Vse preiskovane družbe so leta 2006 in med OP celo izvažale v tretje države po cenah, ki so bile višje od izvoznih cen v Skupnost.
In the same periods, exports to the Community were made at prices exceeding domestic sale prices.
V istih obdobjih se je izvoz v Skupnost izvajal po cenah, ki so presegale domače prodajne cene.
This clearly indicates that the changed circumstances (exports no longer dumped) are of a lasting nature.
To jasno kaže, da so spremenjene razmere (z izvozom brez dampinga) trajne.
It can therefore be concluded that, should the measures be allowed to lapse, the exports to the Community will not be likely to be made at dumped prices.
Zato je mogoče skleniti, da se izvoz v Skupnost verjetno ne bo nadaljeval po dampinških cenah, če se bo dovolilo prenehanje veljavnosti ukrepov.
Also, the changed circumstances with respect to the original investigation regarding the lack of dumping can reasonably be considered to be of a lasting nature.
Tudi spremenjene razmere glede na prvotno preiskavo v zvezi z odsotnostjo dampinga se lahko razumno obravnavajo kot trajne.