natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, for reasons of administrative simplicity, Austria has proposed a solution for the calculation of private use incorporating general statistical data combined with depreciation rules devised for non-harmonised corporate income tax purposes.
Zaradi administrativne poenostavitve pa je Avstrija predlagala rešitev za izračun zasebne rabe z uporabo splošnih statističnih podatkov v povezavi s pravili o amortizaciji, oblikovanimi za neharmonizirane davke od dohodka pravnih oseb.
Since the proposed solution results in a private use element significantly lower than the proportion used by other Member States, it is contradictory to the required uniformity in the calculation of the compensation.
Pri predlagani rešitvi bi bil element zasebne rabe občutno nižji od deleža, ki ga uporabljajo druge države članice, zato je ta rešitev v nasprotju z zahtevano enotnostjo pri izračunavanju nadomestila.
The solution proposed by Austria concerning the calculation of the private use proportion of cars acquired by businesses needs therefore to be declined,
Rešitev, ki jo je predlagala Avstrija za izračun deleža zasebne rabe avtomobilov v podjetjih, je zato treba zavrniti –
The solution proposed by Austria concerning the calculation of the private use proportion of cars acquired by businesses is declined.
Rešitev, ki jo je predlagala Avstrija za izračun deleža zasebne rabe avtomobilov v podjetjih, se zavrne.
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Austria.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Republiko Avstrijo.
Pursuant to Article 13(3) of Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89, the solution proposed by Austria was examined in its entirety by the Advisory Committee on Own Resources at its meeting on 10 December 2009.
V skladu s členom 13(3) Uredbe (EGS, Euratom) št. 1553/89 je Svetovalni odbor za lastna sredstva na seji 10. decembra 2009 v celoti preučil rešitev, ki jo je predlagala Avstrija.
The examination revealed a difference of opinion in the Committee regarding one of the sub-categories of the solution.
Pri pregledu je prišlo do razhajanj v mnenjih članov Odbora glede ene od podkategorij rešitve.
of 27 July 2010
z dne 27. julija 2010
Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 11.6 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Statuta Evropskega sistema centralnih bank in Evropske centralne banke ter zlasti člena 11.6 Statuta,
The thresholds for public tender procedures laid down in Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts [2] have been changed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1177/2009 of 30 November 2009 amending Directives 2004/17/EC, 2004/18/EC and 2009/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council in respect of their application thresholds for the procedures for the award of contracts [3].
Mejne vrednosti javnih razpisnih postopkov, določene v Direktivi 2004/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil gradenj, blaga in storitev [2], so bile spremenjene z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1177/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o spremembi direktiv 2004/17/ES, 2004/18/ES in 2009/81/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede njihovih pragov uporabe za postopke za oddajo naročil [3].
Research and development contracts in the field of banknote security require special security measures and can therefore not be put out to tender.
Pri naročilih za raziskave in razvoj na področju zaščite bankovcev so potrebni posebni varnostni ukrepi, zato za oddajo teh naročil ni mogoče izvesti razpisa.
It should be clarified that such contracts fall under the exception laid down in Article 6(1)(c) of Decision ECB/2007/5 [4].
Treba bi bilo pojasniti, da taka naročila sodijo v okvir izjeme iz člena 6(1)(c) Sklepa ECB/2007/5 [4].
Following a recent judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union [5], it is necessary to clarify that the exemptions for cooperation agreements between the ECB and national central banks (NCBs) and cooperation agreements between the ECB and other Union institutions and bodies, international organisations or government agencies not only cover cooperation in the fulfilment of public tasks, but also auxiliary services for the fulfilment of public tasks.
Glede na nedavno sodbo Sodišča Evropske Unije [5] je treba pojasniti, da izjeme za sporazume o sodelovanju med ECB in nacionalnimi centralnimi bankami (NCB) ter sporazume o sodelovanju med ECB in institucijami in drugimi organi Unije, mednarodnimi organizacijami in državnimi agencijami ne zajemajo samo sodelovanja pri izpolnjevanju javnih nalog, ampak tudi pomožne storitve za izpolnjevanje javnih nalog.
Following recent judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union [6], the time limit for raising objections to the ECB’s requirements needs to be refined further.
Glede na nedavni sodbi Sodišča Evropske unije [6] je treba natančneje določiti rok za vložitev ugovorov na zahteve ECB.
For reasons of transparency, and without prejudice to Decision ECB/2004/3 of 4 March 2004 on public access to European Central Bank documents [7], unsuccessful candidates and tenderers should be entitled to receive copies of all internal documents relating to the evaluation of their application or tender and, under certain conditions, copies of documents relating to the evaluation of the successful tender.
Zaradi preglednosti in brez poseganja v Sklep ECB/2004/3 z dne 4. marca 2004 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropske centralne banke [7] bi morali imeti neizbrani kandidati in ponudniki pravico prejeti kopije vseh internih dokumentov v zvezi z ocenitvijo njihove prijave ali ponudbe, pod določenimi pogoji pa tudi kopije dokumentov v zvezi z ocenitvijo izbrane ponudbe.
It is necessary to clarify that in exceptional, duly justified cases, extensions of a contract may exceed the initial term of a contract.
Treba je pojasniti, da lahko v izjemnih, upravičenih primerih podaljšanja naročila presežejo obdobje prvotnega naročila.
Decision ECB/2007/5 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Sklep ECB/2007/5 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Decision ECB/2007/5 is amended as follows:
Sklep ECB/2007/5 se spremeni:
“research and development contracts in the field of banknote security” means contracts related to theoretical work or practical experimentation, analysis and research carried out under controlled conditions either:
‚naročila za raziskave in razvoj na področju zaščite bankovcev‘ pomenijo naročila v zvezi s teoretičnim delom ali praktičnimi poizkusi, analizami in raziskavami v nadzorovanih pogojih z namenom:
for acquiring new knowledge and inventing new or improving existing materials, manufacturing processes or devices for the origination, production, transport, issuance, authentication and destruction of euro banknotes (including the origination materials of the latter),
pridobivanja novih znanj in razvijanja novih ali izboljševanja obstoječih materialov, postopkov izdelave ali naprav za pripravo za tisk, izdelavo, prevoz, izdajanje, preverjanje pristnosti in uničevanje eurobankovcev (vključno s pripomočki za tiskanje eurobankovcev),
for initiating the manufacture of new or improving existing materials, products or devices for the origination, production, transport, issuance, authentication and destruction of euro banknotes (including the origination materials of the latter).
uvajanja izdelave novih ali izboljševanja obstoječih materialov, izdelkov ali naprav za pripravo za tisk, izdelavo, prevoz, izdajanje, preverjanje pristnosti in uničevanje eurobankovcev (vključno s pripomočki za tiskanje eurobankovcev).
Research and development contracts in the field of banknote security do not include contracts for the pilot printing of euro banknotes.’;
Naročila za raziskave in razvoj na področju zaščite bankovcev ne vključujejo naročil za poskusno tiskanje eurobankovcev.“
paragraph 3(a) is replaced by the following:
Odstavek 3(a) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
cooperation agreements between the ECB and NCBs which serve the fulfilment of Eurosystem/ESCB public tasks;’;
sporazume o sodelovanju med ECB in NCB, ki so namenjeni za izpolnjevanje javnih nalog Eurosistema/ESCB;“
paragraph 3(c) is replaced by the following:
Odstavek 3(c) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
cooperation agreements between the ECB and other Union institutions and bodies, international organisations or government agencies, which serve the fulfilment of public tasks;’;
sporazume o sodelovanju med ECB in drugimi institucijami in organi Unije, mednarodnimi organizacijami ali državnimi agencijami, ki so namenjeni za izpolnjevanje javnih nalog;“
EUR 193000 for supply and service contracts;
193000 EUR za naročila blaga in storitev;
EUR 4845000 for works contracts.’;
4845000 EUR za naročila gradenj.“
paragraph 1(c) is replaced by the following:
Odstavek 1(c) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
when the ECB has classified the contract as secret or when the performance of the contract must be accompanied by special security measures, in accordance with the ECB’s rules on security or when the protection of the ECB’s essential interests so requires.
kadar je ECB označila naročilo kot zaupno ali kadar morajo izvajanje naročila spremljati posebni varnostni ukrepi v skladu s pravili ECB o varnosti ali kadar tako zahteva zaščita temeljnih interesov ECB.
Research and development contracts in the field of banknote security require special security measures and are therefore exempt from the requirements laid down in this Decision.’;
Pri naročilih za raziskave in razvoj na področju zaščite bankovcev so potrebni posebni varnostni ukrepi, zato za ta naročila zahteve iz tega sklepa ne veljajo.“
the following paragraph 2(g) is added:
Doda se naslednji odstavek 2(g):
health and social services.’;
zdravstvene in socialne storitve.“
If a contract is concluded for a fixed term, its term may be extended beyond that initial term under the following conditions:
Če je naročilo sklenjeno za določeno obdobje, se lahko prvotno obdobje podaljša pod naslednjimi pogoji:
the contract notice or, in the case of a procedure under Chapter III, the request for a proposal, provided for the possibility of extensions;
možnost podaljšanja je predvidena v obvestilu o naročilu ali, v primeru postopka iz poglavja III, v opisnem dokumentu;
the possible extensions are duly justified;
možna podaljšanja so upravičena;
the possible extensions were taken into consideration when determining the applicable procedure in accordance with Article 4.
možna podaljšanja so bila upoštevana pri določanju postopka, ki se uporablja, v skladu s členom 4.
The totality of all extensions shall as a rule not exceed the term of the initial contract, except in duly justified cases.’;
Vsa podaljšanja praviloma ne smejo preseči obdobja prvotnega naročila, razen v upravičenih primerih.“
If candidates or tenderers consider that the ECB’s requirements laid down in the contract notice, the invitation to tender or supporting documents are incomplete, inconsistent or illegal or that the ECB or another candidate/tenderer has infringed the applicable procurement rules, they shall notify their objections to the ECB within 15 days.
Če kandidati ali ponudniki menijo, da so zahteve ECB, določene v obvestilu o naročilu, v povabilu k oddaji ponudbe ali v dopolnilnih dokumentih, nepopolne, neusklajene ali nezakonite ali da je ECB ali drug kandidat/ponudnik kršil veljavna pravila za oddajo naročil, morajo svoje ugovore sporočiti ECB v 15 dneh.
If the irregularities affect the invitation to tender or other documents sent by the ECB, the time limit shall start to run from the date of receipt of the documentation.
Če se nepravilnosti nanašajo na povabilo k oddaji ponudbe ali na druge dokumente, ki jih je poslala ECB, začne rok teči od datuma prejema dokumentacije.
In other cases, the time limit shall start to run from the moment the candidates or tenderers become aware of the irregularity or could reasonably have become aware of it.
V drugih primerih začne rok teči od trenutka, ko kandidati ali ponudniki izvejo za nepravilnost ali bi zanjo po razumni domnevi lahko izvedeli.
The ECB may then either correct or supplement the requirements or remedy the irregularity as requested, or reject the request indicating the reasons therefor.
ECB lahko nato bodisi popravi ali dopolni zahteve ali odpravi nepravilnost, kakor je zahtevano, bodisi zavrne zahtevo in navede razloge za zavrnitev.
Objections which are not communicated to the ECB within 15 days may not be raised at a later stage.’;
Ugovorov, ki ECB niso sporočeni v 15 dneh, pozneje ni več mogoče vložiti.“
Article 28(3) is replaced by the following:
Člen 28(3) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Candidates and tenderers may, within 15 days of receipt of the notification, request the ECB to provide the reasons for rejecting their application or their tender and to provide copies of all documents relating to the evaluation of their application or tender.
Kandidati in ponudniki lahko v 15 dneh od prejema obvestila od ECB zahtevajo, da navede razloge za zavrnitev njihove prijave ali ponudbe in predloži kopije vseh dokumentov v zvezi z ocenitvijo njihove prijave ali ponudbe.
Unsuccessful tenderers whose tender was admissible may also ask for the name of the successful tenderer as well as the key characteristics and relative advantage of its tender.
Neizbrani ponudniki, katerih ponudbe so bile sprejemljive, lahko zahtevajo tudi ime izbranega ponudnika ter glavne lastnosti in relativne prednosti njegove ponudbe.
They may also request copies of all documents relating to the evaluation of the successful tender, subject to paragraph 4.’;
Zahtevajo lahko tudi kopije vseh dokumentov v zvezi z ocenitvijo izbrane ponudbe, ob upoštevanju odstavka 4.“
Tenderers may, within 15 days of receipt of the notification, request the ECB to provide the reasons for rejecting their tender and to provide copies of all documents relating to the evaluation of their tender.’
Ponudniki lahko v 15 dneh od prejema obvestila od ECB zahtevajo, da navede razloge za zavrnitev njihove ponudbe in predloži kopije vseh dokumentov v zvezi z ocenitvijo njihove ponudbe.“
This Decision shall enter into force on 1 October 2010.
Ta sklep začne veljati 1. oktobra 2010.
Tender procedures started before the entry into force of this Decision shall be completed in accordance with the provisions of Decision ECB/2007/5 in force at the date when the tender procedure started.
Razpisni postopki, ki so se začeli pred uveljavitvijo tega sklepa, se zaključijo v skladu z določbami Sklepa ECB/2007/5, ki so veljale na dan začetka razpisnega postopka.
For the purpose of this provision a tender procedure is deemed to start on the date on which the contract notice was sent to the Official Journal of the European Union or, in cases where no such notice is required, on the date when the ECB invited one or several suppliers to submit a tender.
Za potrebe te določbe se šteje, da se je razpisni postopek začel na dan, ko je bilo obvestilo o naročilu poslano Uradnemu listu Evropske unije, oziroma, kadar se tako obvestilo ne zahteva, na dan, ko je ECB povabila enega ali več dobaviteljev, da predložijo ponudbo.
Done at Frankfurt am Main, 27 July 2010.
V Frankfurtu na Majni, 27. julija 2010
Case C-480/06 Commission v Germany [2009] ECR I-4747.
Zadeva C-480/06 Komisija proti Nemčiji [2009] PSES I-4747.
Case C-406/08 Uniplex (UK) v NHS Business Services Authority [2010] ECR I-0000 and C-456/08 Commission v Ireland [2010] ECR I-0000.
Zadevi C-406/08 Uniplex (UK) proti NHS Business Services Authority [2010] PSES I-0000 in C-456/08 Komisija proti Irski [2010] ECR I-0000.
OJ L 80, 18.3.2004, p. 42.
UL L 80, 18.3.2004, str. 42.
of 6 January 2010
z dne 6. januarja 2010
on the safety requirements to be met by European standards for bath rings, bathing aids and bath tubs and stands for infants and young children pursuant to Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o varnostnih zahtevah, ki jim v skladu z Direktivo 2001/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta morajo ustrezati Evropski standardi za kopalne obroče, kopalne pripomočke ter kopalne kadi in stojala za kadi za dojenčke in male otroke
(notified under document C(2009) 10290)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 10290)
Having regard to Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety [1], and in particular Article 4(1)(a) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2001/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 3. decembra 2001 o splošni varnosti proizvodov [1] ter zlasti člena 4(1)(a) Direktive,
These standards should ensure that products satisfy the general safety requirement of the Directive.
Ti standardi morajo zagotavljati, da proizvodi izpolnjujejo splošno varnostno zahtevo Direktive.
Under Directive 2001/95/EC a product is presumed safe, as far as the risks and risk categories covered by national standards are concerned, when it conforms to voluntary national standards transposing European standards.
V skladu z Direktivo 2001/95/ES se domneva, da je proizvod varen glede nevarnosti in vrste nevarnosti, zajetih v ustreznih nacionalnih standardih, kadar je v skladu s prostovoljnimi nacionalnimi standardi, ki prevzemajo evropske.
In 2006 the Commission commissioned a study [2] to assess the safety of several child-care articles which are commonly used for the care of infants and young children from 0 until 5 years of age, in cooperation with national authorities, national standardisation bodies, consumer associations, product safety organisations, economic operators and testing laboratories.
Komisija je v sodelovanju z nacionalni organi, nacionalnimi organi za standardizacijo, potrošniškimi združenji, organizacijami za varnost proizvodov, gospodarskimi subjekti in laboratoriji za testiranje leta 2006 naročila študijo [2] za oceno varnosti številnih proizvodov za nego otrok, ki se pogosto uporabljajo pri negi dojenčkov in malih otrok, starih od 0 do 5 let.
For these products, the study collected relevant statistics on accidents and injuries in the EU and worldwide and carried out a complete risk assessment, based on identification of the main hazards and assessment of exposure scenarios.
V študiji so bili za te proizvode zbrani ustrezni statistični podatki o nesrečah in poškodbah v EU in po svetu, opravljena pa je bila tudi celovita ocena nevarnosti, ki je temeljila na opredelitvi glavnih nevarnosti in oceni možnih izpostavljenosti.
Bath rings, bathing aids and bath tubs, whether or not combined with stands, are amongst the products assessed by the study.
Študija je med drugim ocenila kopalne obroče, kopalne pripomočke in kopalne kadi s stojali ali brez njih.
These products are used to bath babies and young children and have been identified as posing serious risks, mainly of drowning accidents which have often resulted in fatalities, due to the young age of the users.
Ti proizvodi se uporabljajo za kopanje dojenčkov in malih otrok, ugotovljeno pa je bilo, da so zelo nevarni predvsem za utopitev, kar je pogosto povzročilo smrtne primere zaradi nizke starosti uporabnikov.
Evidence and statistics gathered from accidents consistently show that the risk of drowning is due to insufficient, inconclusive and inconspicuous warnings and instructions on the safe use of products and to their poor structural integrity and resistance.
Dokazi in statistični podatki, zbrani iz nesreč, dosledno kažejo, da nevarnost za utopitev obstaja zaradi nezadostnih, nejasnih in nevidnih opozoril in navodil za varno uporabo proizvodov ter zaradi slabe strukturne celovitosti in odpornosti proizvodov.
Accidents and statistics have also revealed risks of falling, injury and ingestion of small parts associated with the use of these products and inadequate supervision on the part of the carer.
Nesreče in statistični podatki so tudi razkrili nevarnost za padce, poškodbe in zaužitje majhnih delov pri uporabi teh proizvodov in neustreznem nadzoru negovalcev.
Although there is extensive information worldwide on bath-drowning accidents and injuries in early childhood, a direct correlation between the use of bath-assisting devices and fatalities or accidents in the bath is unconfirmed.
Čeprav obstajajo številne informacije o utopitvah in poškodbah pri kopanju v zgodnjem otroštvu po svetu, neposredna povezava med uporabo pripomočkov za pomoč pri kopanju in smrtnimi primeri ali nesrečami pri kopanju ni potrjena.
Researchers and scientific literature worldwide concur that there is no decisive evidence demonstrating a link between the increase in the number of accidents and the use of bath-assisting devices [3].
Sklep raziskovalcev in svetovne znanstvene literature je, da ni jasnih dokazov, ki bi potrjevali povezavo med naraščajočim številom nesreč in uporabo pripomočkov za kopanje [3].
Some researchers, observing latest trends of the increase in the sales of bath rings and the decrease in bath-related accidents and drowning, have even claimed a ‘small protective effect’ due the use of bath rings [4].
Nekateri raziskovalci so zaradi ugotovljene povezave med počasnejšim naraščanjem prodaje kopalnih obročev in zmanjšanjem nesreč in utopitev pri kopanju celo zagovarjali „majhen varnostni učinek“ pri uporabi kopalnih obročev [4].
No European standards exist for these three types of products.
Za te tri vrste proizvodov ni evropskih standardov.
It is therefore necessary to determine specific requirements under Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 2001/95/EC, with the view to requesting the standardisation bodies to develop standards to reduce the risks associated with the use of bath rings, bath aids and bath tubs (whether or not combined with stands) while bathing babies or young children.
Zato je treba določiti posebne zahteve po členu 4(1)(a) Direktive 2001/95/ES, da se od organov za standardizacijo zahteva, da pripravijo standarde za zmanjšanje nevarnosti pri uporabi kopalnih obročev, kopalnih pripomočkov in kopalnih kadi (s stojali ali brez njih) pri kopanju dojenčkov ali malih otrok.
These standards should be developed according to the procedure laid down in Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services [5].
Te standarde je treba oblikovati po postopku iz Direktive 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. junija 1998 o določitvi postopka za zbiranje informacij na področju tehničnih standardov in tehničnih predpisov o storitvah informacijske družbe [5].
The reference of the standard adopted should be published in the Official Journal of the European Union, in accordance with Article 4(2) of Directive 2001/95/EC.
Sklic na sprejeti standard je treba v skladu s členom 4(2) Direktive 2001/95/ES objaviti v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Once the relevant standards are available, and provided that the Commission decides to publish their reference in the Official Journal, according to the procedure laid down in Article 4(2) of Directive 2001/95/EC, bath rings, bathing aids and bath tubs (whether or not combined with stands) manufactured in compliance with such standards should be presumed to conform to the general safety requirement of Directive 2001/95/EC, as far as the safety requirements covered by the standards are concerned.
Ko bodo zadevni standardi na voljo, če se bo Komisija odločila, da objavi sklic nanje v Uradnem listu, je treba po postopku iz člena 4(2) Direktive 2001/95/ES domnevati, da kopalni obroči, kopalni pripomočki in kopalne kadi (s stojali ali brez njih), proizvedeni v skladu s takšnimi standardi, izpolnjujejo splošne varnostne zahteve Direktive 2001/95/ES glede varnostnih zahtev, ki jih zajemajo standardi.
To improve the current safety levels while using these products, it is necessary to both take action on standards and provide parents and adult caregivers with information on the purpose and safe use of these products.
Za izboljšanje trenutne ravni varnosti pri uporabi teh proizvodov je treba ukrepati glede standardov ter staršem in odraslim negovalcem zagotoviti informacije o namenu in varni uporabi teh proizvodov.