natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‘First version of the SSN restructuring plan with business plan for SSN for 2008-2012 taking into account the information obtained in the course of the due diligence process carried out in the shipyard’ and ‘Additional explanations, outline of the restructuring programme and declared commitments concerning the purchase of SSN submitted by Amber’ of 29 February 2008.
„Prva različica načrta za prestrukturiranje za SSN s poslovnim načrtom za SSN za obdobje 2008-2012, ob upoštevanju informacij, pridobljenih med skrbnim postopkom, izvedenim v ladjedelnici“, in „Dodatna pojasnila, okvirni program prestrukturiranja in izjava o zavezanosti glede nakupa SSN, ki jo je predložil Amber“ z dne 29. februarja 2008.
Parts of this text have been deleted in order not to divulge confidential information; they are indicated by a series of dots between square brackets.
Deli tega besedila so bili izbrisani, da se ne bi razkrile zaupne informacije; zaupne informacije so nakazane s pikami v oglatem kvadratnem oklepaju.
Letter of 11 July 2007.
Dopis z dne 11. julija 2007.
Letter of 9 January 2008, p. 15.
Dopis z dne 9. januarja 2008, str. 15.
Letter of 17 February 2006.
Dopis z dne 17. februarja 2006.
A strategy for the shipbuilding sector (maritime construction shipyards) in Poland 2006-2010, adopted in August 2006, p. 30.
Strategija za ladjedelniški sektor (ladjedelnice za pomorske gradnje) na Poljskem med letoma 2006 in 2010, sprejeta avgusta 2006, str. 30.
Annex 1 to letter of 6 June 2008.
Priloga 1 k dopisu z dne 6. junija 2008.
Letter of 26 June 2008.
Dopis z dne 26. junija 2008.
The list of these guarantees was provided by Poland in Annex 11 to the restructuring plan of Mostostal submitted on 26 June 2008.
Seznam teh garancij je Poljska navedla v Prilogi 11 k načrtu za prestrukturiranje Mostostala, ki je bil predložen 26. junija 2008.
See, also, Commission Decision of 18 July 2007 in case N 105/07, Guarantee scheme for export contracts, summary notice (OJ C 214, 13.9.2007, p. 3).
Glej tudi Odločbo Komisije z dne 18. julij 2007 v zadevi N 105/2007, Jamstvena shema za izvozne pogodbe, povzetek v UL C 214, 13.9.2007, str. 3.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-109/01 Fleuren Compost v Commission, cited above, paragraph 74.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje v zadevi T-109/01, Fleuren Compost proti Komisiji, omenjena zgoraj, odstavek 74.
Opinion of Advocate-General Jacobs in Case C-256/97 DM Transport [1999] ECR I-3915; Case C-480/98 Spain v Commission (‘Magefesa’) [2000] ECR I-8717.
Sklepni predlogi generalnega pravobranilca Jacobsa, zadeva C-256/97 DM Transport, Recueil 1999, str. I-3915, zadeva C-480/98 Španija proti Komisiji („Magefesa“), Recueil 2000, str. I-8717.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-109/01 Fleuren Compost v Commission, paragraph 74.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje v zadevi T-109/01, Fleuren Compost proti Komisiji, odstavek 74.
This measure was included in part A of the Annex to the decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure as a measure put into effect before accession.
Ta ukrep je bil vključen v del A priloge k odločitvi o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave kot ukrep, ki je začel veljati pred pristopom.
Opinion of Advocate-General Jacobs, Case C-256/97, DM Transport [1999] ECR I-3915, Case C-480/98, Spain v Commission (‘Magefesa’) [2000] ECR I-8717.
Sklepni predlogi generalnega pravobranilca Jacobsa, zadeva C-256/97 DM Transport, Recueil 1999, str. I-3915, zadeva C-480/98 Španija proti Komisiji („Magefesa“), Recueil 2000, str. I-8717.
A strategy for the shipbuilding sector (maritime construction shipyards) in Poland 2006-2010, adopted in August 2006, p. 7.
Strategija za ladjedelniški sektor (ladjedelnice za pomorske gradnje) na Poljskem med letoma 2006 in 2010, sprejeta avgusta 2006, str. 7.
Decision in case N 105/07.
Odločba v zadevi N 105/07.
Article 3(1)(1) of Resolution 111/2006 of the Export Insurance Policy Committee of 20 December 2006.
Člen 3(1)(1) Sklepa 111/2006 Odbora izvozno-kreditne agencije z dne 20. decembra 2006.
OJ C 71, 11.3.2001, p. 14.
UL C 71, 11.3.2001, str. 14.
OJ C 317, 30.12.2003, p. 12.
UL C 317, 30.12.2003, str. 12.
Letter of 4 October 2005 containing Poland’s comments on the decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure.
Dopis z dne 4. oktober 2006, ki vsebuje pripombe Poljske k odločitvi o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave.
Amber indicated that its analysis showed that the yard would not become profitable after the restructuring which Amber envisaged implementing.
Amber je navedel, da je njegova analiza pokazala, da ladjedelnica ne bo postala dobičkonosna po prestrukturiranju, ki ga je Amber načrtoval.
See point 43 of the Guidelines.
Glej točko 43 Smernic.
Part of these liabilities were swapped for equity in August 2008 (PLN 131,5 million; see recital 201) and part remains to be paid back (PLN 66 million).
Del teh obveznosti je bil zamenjan za kapital avgusta 2008 (131,5 milijona PLN; glej uvodno izjavo 201), del pa je treba še odplačati (66 milijonov PLN).
In addition, the Commission notes that according to one of the annexes to the restructuring plan of 12 September 2008, which presents the general assumptions of the restructuring process, the value of this land was initially estimated at PLN […] million.
Poleg tega Komisija upošteva, da je bila v skladu z eno izmed prilog k načrtu za prestrukturiranje z 12. septembra 2008, ki predstavlja splošna predvidevanja načrta za prestrukturiranje, vrednost tega zemljišča prvotno ocenjena na […] milijonov PLN.
This is similar to the Automobile Craiova case (case No 46/07), in which the Commission concluded that under the Automobile Craiova privatisation process the Romanian authorities had imposed certain conditions upon the buyer (with regard to minimum employment and the level of investment in the undertaking sold) in exchange for a reduced sales price, which constituted State aid to the benefit of the undertaking sold.
To je podobno kot v zadevi Automobile Craiova (zadeva št. 46/07), v kateri je Komisija sklenila, da so v postopku privatizacije Automobile Craiova romunski organi kupcu postavili nekaj pogojev (v zvezi z najmanjšim številom zaposlenih in ravnjo naložb v prodanem podjetju) v zameno za znižanje prodajne cene, kar je pomenilo državno pomoč v korist prodanemu podjetju.
The Commission notes that after completing the existing contracts and implementing the planned restructuring measures, SSN Nowa is supposed to be wound up and if there is any extra cash left it is supposed to be equally divided between Mostostal and the State.
Komisija upošteva, da naj bi SSN Nowa po dokončanju obstoječih pogodb in izvedbi načrtovanih ukrepov za prestrukturiranje prenehala poslovati, morebiten preostanek denarja pa naj bi se enakomerno razdelil med Mostostal in državo.
The Commission considers that this might at most lead to a reduction of the State aid granted under the privatisation process, but would not alter the fact that the transfer of the assets at below their market value had been ‘polluted’ with State aid and therefore their sale cannot serve as an own contribution free of State aid.
Komisija meni, da lahko to v najboljšem primeru pomeni zmanjšanje državne pomoči, dodeljene v postopku privatizacije, vendar to ne bo spremenilo dejstva, da je prenos sredstev pod njihovo tržno vrednostjo „okužen“ z državno pomočjo, in zato njihova prodaja ne more predstavljati lastnega prispevka, ki ne vsebuje državne pomoči.
At the meeting on 10 September 2008 it became clear that the restructuring plan was drafted by Mostostal and not Ulstein.
Na sestanku 10. septembra 2008 je postalo jasno, da je načrt za prestrukturiranje pripravil Mostostal in ne Ulstein.
Ulstein had not even seen the draft sent to the Commission on 3 September 2008 and was surprised to hear that its capital commitment was supposed to be PLN 114 million.
Ulstein osnutka, ki je bil poslan Komisiji 3. septembra 2008, sploh ni videl, in je bil presenečen, da naj bi njegova kapitalska obveza znašala 114 milijonov PLN.
Assuming USD 1 = PLN 2,3.
Ob predpostavki menjalnega tečaja 1 USD = 2,3 PLN.
Commission notice on the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 273, 9.9.1997, p. 3).
Obvestilo Komisije o metodi določanja referenčnih/diskontnih stopenj (UL C 273, 9.9.1997, str. 3).
See, for example, Commission notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees (2000/C 71/07) (OJ C 71, 11.3.2000, p. 14).
Glej na primer Obvestilo Komisije o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES za državno pomoč v obliki poroštev (2000/C 71/07) (UL C 71, 11.3.2000, str. 14).
Point 3.2 of the notice states that where, at the time the loan is granted, there is a strong probability that the borrower will default, e.g. because he is in financial difficulty, the value of the guarantee may be as high as the amount effectively covered by the guarantee.
Točka 3.2 Obvestila navaja, da če v času dodelitve posojila obstaja velika verjetnost, da ga posojilojemalec ne bo mogel odplačati, npr. ker je v finančnih težavah, je lahko vrednost jamstva enako visoka kot znesek, ki ga jamstvo dejansko krije.
Recital 68 of Commission Decision 2005/827/EC of 16 June 2004 on the measures implemented by Spain for Siderúrgica Añón SA (OJ L 311, 26.11.2005, p. 22); recital 42 of Commission Decision 2003/284/EC of 11 December 2002 on the State aid implemented by Spain for Sniace SA (OJ L 108, 30.4.2003, p. 35).
Uvodna izjava 68 Odločbe Komisije 2005/824/ES z dne 16. junija 2004 o ukrepih, ki jih izvaja Španija za podjetje Siderúrgica Añón SA (UL L 311, 26.11.2005, str. 22); uvodna izjava 42 Odločbe Komisije 2003/284/ES z dne 11. decembra 2002 o državni pomoči Španije za Sniace SA (UL L 108, 30.4.2003, str. 35).
See, for example, Commission Decision of 23 October 2007 on State aid C 23/06 which Poland has implemented for the steel producer Technologie Buczek Group (not yet published).
Glej na primer Odločbo Komisije z dne 23. oktobra 2007 o državni pomoči C 23/06, ki jo je Poljska dodelila za proizvajalko jekla Technologie Buczek Group (še ni objavljeno).
See, for example, Commission Decision 2005/652/EC of 20 October 2004 on State aid C 38/03 implemented by Spain (further restructuring aid to the public Spanish shipyards) (OJ L 240, 16.9.2005, p. 45).
Glej na primer Odločbo Komisije 2005/652/ES z dne 20. oktobra 2004 o državni pomoči C 38/03, ki jo izvaja Španija (nadaljnja pomoč za prestrukturiranje španskih javnih ladjedelnic) (UL L 240, 16.9.2005, str. 45).
See Case C-277/00 Germany v Commission (‘SMI’) [2004] ECR I-3925 and Cases C-328/99 and C-399/00 Italy and SMI 2 Multimedia Spa v Commission [2003] ECR I-4035.
Glej zadevo C-277/00 Nemčija proti Komisiji („SMI“), Recueil 2004, str. I-3925 ter zadevi C-328/99 in C-399/00 Italija in SMI 2 Multimedia Spa proti Komisiji, Recueil 2003, str. I-4035.
INFORMATION REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRESENT DECISION
INFORMACIJE O IZVAJANJU TE ODLOČBE
Please provide the following details on the amount of unlawful State aid that has been put at the disposal of the beneficiary:
Prosimo, navedite naslednje podatke o znesku nezakonite državne pomoči, ki je bila dodeljena upravičencu:
Please explain in detail how the interest to be paid on the amount of aid to be recovered will be calculated.
Prosimo, natančno pojasnite, kako se obračunavajo obresti za terjani znesek pomoči.
Measures planned and already taken to recover the aid
Načrtovani in že sprejeti ukrepi za izterjavo
Please describe in detail what measures are planned and what measures have already been taken to effect an immediate and effective recovery of the aid.
Prosimo, natančno opišite, kateri ukrepi so načrtovani in kateri so že bili sprejeti za izvršitev takojšnje in učinkovite izterjave pomoči.
Please also indicate where relevant the legal basis for the measures taken/planned.
Kjer je to primerno, navedite pravno podlago za sprejete ali načrtovane ukrepe.
When will recovery of the aid be completed?
Kdaj bo postopek izterjave pomoči zaključen?
Recovery already effected
Že izterjana pomoč
Please attach proof of the repayment of the aid amounts specified in the table under point 3.1 above.
Prosimo, priložite dokazila o vračilu zneskov, navedenih v zgornji preglednici pod točko 3.1.
Date(s) on which (individual instalments of) the aid was (were) put at the disposal of the beneficiary.
Datum(-i), ko je bila pomoč (ali posamezni obroki) dodeljena upravičencu.
Amount of aid put at the disposal of the beneficiary (in gross aid equivalents).
Znesek pomoči, ki je bil dodeljen upravičencu (v bruto ekvivalentih pomoči).
Date(s) on which the aid was repaid.
Datum(-i), ko je bila pomoč vrnjena.
These were provided on 16 June 2004.
Poljska jih je posredovala 16. junija 2004.
The Commission requested further information by letters of 12 August 2004, 18 November 2004 and 4 March 2005, to which Poland replied by letters of 24 September 2004, registered on that day, of 28 January 2005, registered on 2 February 2005, of 30 March 2005, registered on 1 April 2005 and of 18 April 2005, registered on 20 April 2005 respectively.
Komisija je za dodatne informacije zaprosila z dopisi z dne 12. avgusta 2004, 18. novembra 2004 in 4. marca 2005, na katere je Poljska odgovorila z dopisi z dne 24. septembra 2004, evidentiranim istega dne, z dne 28. januarja 2005, evidentiranim 2. februarja 2005, z dne 30. marca 2005, evidentiranim 1. aprila 2005, in z dne 18. aprila 2005, evidentiranim 20. aprila 2005.
Meetings with the Polish authorities took place on the following dates: 9 November 2004, 17 November 2004 and 3 March 2005.
Sestanki s poljskimi organi so potekali 9. novembra 2004, 17. novembra 2004 in 3. marca 2005.
Poland asked for an extension of the deadline for submission of comments on the decision opening the procedure by letters of 30 June 2005, registered on 1 July 2005, 26 July, registered on 27 July 2005, and 30 August 2005, registered on 1 September 2005.
Komisija je odgovorila z dopisom z dne 15. julija 2005.
The Commission replied by letters of 12 July, 2 August and 9 September 2005 respectively.
Poljska je zaprosila za podaljšanje roka za predložitev pripomb glede odločitve o sprožitvi postopka z dopisi z dne 30. junija 2005, evidentiranim 1. julija 2005, z dne 26. julija, evidentiranim 27. julija 2005, in z dne 30. avgusta 2005, evidentiranim 1. septembra 2005.
The Commission forwarded these comments to Poland by letter of 27 October 2005.
Komisija je te pripombe posredovala Poljski z dopisom z dne 27. oktobra 2005.
The Polish authorities replied by letter of 21 November 2005.
Poljski organi so odgovorili z dopisom z dne 21. novembra 2005.
The Commission sought the assistance of an external consultant for the evaluation of the 2003 restructuring plan.
Komisija je poiskala pomoč zunanjega svetovalca, ki je ocenil načrt za prestrukturiranje 2003.
The consultant submitted his report to the Commission in March 2006.
Svetovalec je poročilo Komisiji predložil marca 2006.
Following the meeting, the Commission asked Poland for additional information by letters of 8 March 2006, 30 March 2006, 12 April 2006 and 28 April 2006.
Po sestanku je Komisija Poljsko zaprosila za dodatne informacije, in sicer z dopisi z dne 8. marca 2006, 30. marca 2006, 12. aprila 2006 in 28. aprila 2006.
The Polish authorities replied by letters of 13 March 2006, registered on the same day, 29 March 2006, registered on 30 March 2006, 6 April 2006, registered on 10 April 2006, 19 April 2006, registered on 20 April 2006, and 26 May 2006, registered on 30 May 2006.
Poljski organi so odgovorili z dopisi z dne 13. marca 2006, evidentiranim istega dne, z dne 29. marca 2006, evidentiranim 30. marca 2006, z dne 6. aprila 2006, evidentiranim 10. aprila 2006, z dne 19. aprila 2006, evidentiranim 20. aprila 2006, in z dne 26. maja 2006, evidentiranim 30. maja 2006.
By letter of 23 June 2006, registered on 26 June 2006, the yard’s consultant submitted a draft restructuring plan entitled ‘Development plan for Stocznia Szczecińska Nowa Sp. z o.o. for 2006-2011’ to the Commission for consultation purposes.
Z dopisom z dne 23. junija 2006, evidentiranim 26. junija 2006, je svetovalec ladjedelnice Komisiji predložil osnutek načrta za prestrukturiranje z naslovom „Razvojni načrt za Stocznia Szczecinska Nowa Sp. z o.o. za obdobje 2006–2011“, in sicer za namene posvetovanja.
The Polish authorities submitted information concerning the SSN restructuring process in a letter of 13 July 2006, registered on 17 July 2006.
Poljski organi so z dopisom z dne 13. julija 2006, evidentiranim 17. julija 2006, predložili informacije v zvezi s postopkom prestrukturiranja SSN.
By letter of 17 July 2006 the Commission asked the Polish authorities to submit additional information.
Z dopisom z dne 17. julija 2006 je Komisija poljske organe zaprosila za dodatne informacije.
Mr Wozniak stated that Poland was determined to relaunch the privatisation process for SSN by means of an open and transparent procedure, which was to be finalised by June 2007.
Minister je navedel, da je Poljska odločena ponovno začeti postopek privatizacije za SSN s pomočjo odprtega in preglednega postopka, ki naj bi se zaključil do junija 2007.
Poland confirmed this statement by letter of 27 December 2006, registered on 4 January 2007, referring to the decision of the Polish Council of Ministers of 19 December 2006, which adopted a document entitled ‘Information on the state of the shipbuilding industry’.
Poljska je to izjavo potrdila z dopisom z dne 27. decembra 2006, evidentiranim 4. januarja 2007, in se sklicevala na odločbo poljskega sveta ministrov z dne 19. decembra 2006, ki je sprejel dokument z naslovom „Informacije o stanju ladjedelniške industrije“.
Following the meeting, the Commission requested a range of data from SSN by letters of 29 March 2007, 27 April 2007 and 30 May 2007.
Po sestanku je Komisija SSN zaprosila za vrsto podatkov, in sicer z dopisi z dne 29. marca 2007, z dne 27. aprila 2007 in 30. maja 2007.
The yard replied by letters of 18 April 2007, registered on 27 April 2007, 8 May 2007, registered on 10 May 2007, and 4 June 2007, registered on 5 June 2007.
Ladjedelnica je odgovorila z dopisi z dne 18. aprila 2007, evidentiranim 27. aprila 2007, z dne 8. maja 2007, evidentiranim 10. maja 2007, in z dne 4. junija 2007, evidentiranim 5. junija 2007.
On 8 June a meeting took place between Commission staff, the Polish authorities and representatives of the yard.
junija so se sestali osebje Komisije, poljski organi in predstavniki ladjedelnice.
The Polish authorities provided information concerning the privatisation and restructuring of SSN in letters of 5 January 2007, registered on the same day, and 9 January 2007, registered on 11 January 2007.
Poljski organi so informacije o privatizaciji in prestrukturiranje SSN posredovali z dopisoma z dne 5. januarja 2007, evidentiranim istega dne, in z dne 9. januarja 2007, evidentiranim 11. januarja 2007.
The Commission replied by letter of 29 January 2007.
Komisija je odgovorila z dopisom z dne 29. januarja 2007.
In a letter of 28 February 2007, registered on the same day, the Polish authorities undertook to choose an investor for the yard and sign a privatisation agreement by the end of June 2007.
V dopisu z dne 28. februarja 2007, evidentiranem istega dne, so se poljski organi zavezali k izbiri vlagatelja za ladjedelnico in podpisu privatizacijskega sporazuma do konca junija 2007.
The Commission requested further clarifications concerning the privatisation of SSN by letters of 29 May 2007, 28 June 2007 and 30 July 2007.
Komisija je z dopisi z dne 29. maja 2007, 28. junija 2007 in 30. julija 2007 zaprosila za dodatna pojasnila v zvezi s privatizacijo SSN.
Poland provided information in this respect by letter of 1 June 2007, registered on 4 June 2007, which contained a list of enterprises to which an invitation to submit offers for the purchase of SSN had been sent.
Poljska je v zvezi s tem posredovala informacije v dopisu z dne 1. junija 2007, evidentiranem 4. junija 2007, ki je vseboval seznam podjetij, ki jim je bilo poslano povabilo k oddaji ponudbe za nakup SSN.
The Commission requested clarifications by letter of 4 September 2007.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 4. septembra 2007 zahtevala pojasnila.
The Polish authorities replied by letters of 7 September 2007, registered on 10 September 2007, and 11 September 2007, in which Poland submitted the new version of the Information Memorandum and informed the Commission that invitations to submit offers had been sent to 221 potential investors.
Poljski organi so odgovorili z dopisoma z dne 7. septembra 2007, evidentiranim 10. septembra 2007, in z dne 11. septembra 2007, s katerim je Poljska predložila novo različico informacijskega memoranduma in Komisijo obvestila, da je bilo povabilo k oddaji ponudbe poslano 221 potencialnim investitorjem.
The Commission asked for additional information by letter of 12 September 2007.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 12. septembra 2007 zaprosila za dodatne informacije.
The Commission gave its comments on the Information Memorandum and asked for clarifications by letters of 14 September 2007 and 3 October 2007.
Komisija je podala pripombe v zvezi z informacijskim memorandumom in za pojasnila zaprosila z dopisoma z dne 14. septembra 2007 in 3. oktobra 2007.
The Polish authorities replied by letter of 12 October 2007, registered on 16 October 2007, stating that six potential investors had requested a copy of the yard’s Information Memorandum.
Poljski organi so odgovorili z dopisom z dne 12. oktobra 2007, evidentiranim 16. oktobra 2007, v katerem so navedli, da je šest potencialnih investitorjev zaprosilo za kopijo informacijskega memoranduma ladjedelnice.
Poland provided further information on the privatisation process by letters of 11 December 2007, registered on 13 December 2007, and 19 December 2007, registered on 20 December 2007.
Poljska je posredovala dodatne informacije o postopku privatizacije z dopisoma z dne 11. decembra 2007, evidentiranim 13. decembra 2007, in z dne 19. decembra 2007, evidentiranim 20. decembra 2007.
By letter of 21 December 2007, registered on the same day, Poland informed the Commission that on 20 December 2007 Amber Sp. z o.o.
Z dopisom z dne 21. decembra 2007, evidentiranim istega dne, je Poljska obvestila Komisijo, da je bil dne 20. decembra 2007 Amber Sp. z o.o.
Following the meeting, the Commission asked the Polish authorities to submit additional information concerning the privatisation process by letters of 17 January 2008, 30 January 2008, 28 February 2008, 18 March 2008 and 2 April 2008.
Po tem sestanku je Komisija poljske organe zaprosila, naj predložijo dodatne informacije v zvezi s postopkom privatizacije, in sicer z dopisi z dne 17. januarja 2008, 30. januarja 2008, 28. februarja 2008, 18. marca 2008 in 2. aprila 2008.
The Polish authorities answered the Commission’s requests by letters of 23 January 2008, registered on 24 January 2008, 25 January 2008, registered on 28 January 2008, and 30 January 2008, registered on 31 January 2008.
Poljski organi so na dopise Komisije odgovorili z dopisi z dne 23. januarja 2008, evidentiranim 24. januarja 2008, z dne 25. januarja 2008, evidentiranim 28. januarja 2008, in z dne 30. januarja 2008, evidentiranim 31. januarja 2008.
By letter of 8 February 2008, registered on the same day, Poland submitted a copy of Amber’s binding offer.
Z dopisom z dne 8. februarja 2008, evidentiranim istega dne, je Poljska posredovala kopijo zavezujoče ponudbe Amberja.
By letter of 28 March 2008, registered on the same day, the Polish authorities stated that the exclusivity period granted to Amber for negotiations had been extended to 15 April 2008.
V dopisu z dne 28. marca 2008, evidentiranem istega dne, so poljski organi navedli, da so obdobje ekskluzivnosti, odobreno Amberju za pogajanja, podaljšali do 15. prila 2008.
Following an invitation from the Polish authorities in a letter of 4 April 2008, registered on 7 April 2008, a meeting took place on 10 April 2008 between the Polish authorities, representatives of SSN, Amber and Commission staff.
Na povabilo poljskih organov v dopisu z dne 4. aprila 2008, evidentiranem 7. aprila 2008, so se sestali poljski organi, predstavniki SSN, Amber in osebje Komisije.