natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Regulation constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latter’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [5], which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of that Agreement [6].
Ta uredba predstavlja za Islandijo in Norveško razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško o pridružitvi obeh k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [5], ki sodijo na področje iz člena 1(A) Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES z dne 17. maja 1999 o nekaterih izvedbenih predpisih za uporabo navedenega sporazuma [6].
As regards Switzerland, this Regulation constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [7], which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decisions 2008/146/EC [8] and 2008/149/JHA [9].
Ta uredba predstavlja za Švico razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [7], ki sodijo na področje iz člena 1(A) Sklepa 1999/437/ES v povezavi s členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2008/146/ES [8] in členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2008/149/PNZ [9].
As regards Liechtenstein, this Regulation constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Protocol signed between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/261/EC [10].
Ta uredba predstavlja za Lihtenštajn razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Protokola med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda, ki sodijo na področje člena 1(A) Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES v povezavi s členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2008/261/ES [10].
Therefore, Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 should be amended accordingly,
Zato bi bilo Uredbo (ES) št. 2252/2004 treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 is hereby amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 2252/2004 se spremeni:
In Article 1, paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be replaced by the following:
V členu 1 se odstavka 1 in 2 nadomestita z naslednjim:
Passports and travel documents issued by Member States shall comply with the minimum security standards set out in the Annex.
Potni listi in potovalni dokumenti, ki jih izdajo države članice, morajo biti skladni z minimalnimi standardi, določenimi v Prilogi.
They shall be issued as individual documents.
Izdajo se kot individualni dokumenti.
The Commission shall present a report on the requirements for children travelling alone or accompanied, crossing the external borders of the Member States not later than 26 June 2012 and propose, if necessary, appropriate initiatives in order to ensure a common approach regarding the rules for the protection of children crossing the external borders of the Member States.
Komisija najkasneje do 26. junija 2012 predloži poročilo o zahtevah za otroke, ki potujejo sami ali v spremstvu in prečkajo zunanje meje držav članic, ter po potrebi predlaga primerne pobude, da se zagotovi skupen pristop glede pravil o zaščiti otrok, ki prečkajo zunanje meje držav članic.
Passports and travel documents shall include a highly secure storage medium which shall contain a facial image.
Potni listi in potovalni dokumenti imajo zelo varen pomnilniški medij, ki vsebuje podobo obraza.
Member States shall also include two fingerprints taken flat in interoperable formats.
Države članice vključijo tudi dva ploska prstna odtisa v interoperabilni obliki.
The following persons shall be exempt from the requirement to give fingerprints:
Od zahteve za dajanje prstnih odtisov so izvzete naslednje osebe:
Children under the age of 12 years.
otroci, mlajši od 12 let.
The age limit of 12 years is provisional.
Starostna meja 12 let je začasna.
The report referred to in Article 5a shall contain a review of the age limit, if necessary accompanied by a proposal to amend the age limit.
Poročilo iz člena 5a vključuje revizijo starostne meje, po potrebi pa se mu priloži predlog za spremembo te meje.
persons, where fingerprinting is physically impossible.
osebe, pri katerih je jemanje prstnih odtisov fizično nemogoče.
Where fingerprinting of the designated fingers is temporarily impossible, Member States shall allow the fingerprinting of the other fingers.
Če odvzem prstnih odtisov prstov, ki so za to predvideni, začasno ni mogoč, države članice dovolijo odvzem prstnih odtisov drugih prstov.
Where it is also temporarily impossible to take fingerprints of any of the other fingers, they may issue a temporary passport having a validity of 12 months or less.’;
Če začasno ni mogoč niti odvzem prstnih odtisov kateregakoli drugega prsta, lahko izdajo začasni potni list, ki je veljaven 12 mesecev ali manj.“
The biometric identifiers shall be taken by qualified and duly authorised staff of the national authorities responsible for issuing passports and travel documents.
Biometrične identifikatorje odvzame usposobljeno in ustrezno pooblaščeno osebje nacionalnih organov, pristojnih za izdajanje potnih listov in potovalnih dokumentov.
Member States shall collect biometric identifiers from the applicant in accordance with the safeguards laid down in the Council of Europe’s Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Države članice zbirajo biometrične identifikatorje prosilcev v skladu z jamstvi iz Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter v Konvenciji Združenih narodov o otrokovih pravicah.
Member States shall ensure that appropriate procedures guaranteeing the dignity of the person concerned are in place in the event of there being difficulties in enrolling.’;
Države članice zagotovijo, da so predvideni ustrezni postopki, s katerimi se zajamči dostojanstvo zadevnih oseb v primeru, da pride do težav pri registraciji.“
Additional technical specifications in accordance with international standards, including in particular the recommendations of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), for passports and travel documents relating to the following shall be established in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 5(2):
V skladu s postopkom iz člena 5(2) se določijo dodatne tehnične zahteve za potne liste in potovalne dokumente v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi, vključno predvsem s priporočili Mednarodne organizacije za civilno letalstvo (ICAO), ki se nanašajo na:
additional security features and requirements, including enhanced anti-forgery, counterfeiting and falsification standards;
dodatne varnostne značilnosti in zahteve, vključno z višjimi standardi zaščite pred prenarejanjem in ponarejanjem;
requirements for quality and common technical standards for the facial image and the fingerprints.’;
zahteve glede kakovosti in skupnih tehničnih standardov za podobo obraza in prstne odtise.“
In Article 4, paragraph 3 shall be replaced by the following:
Člen 4(3) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Biometric data shall be collected and stored in the storage medium of passports and travel documents with a view to issuing such documents.
Biometrični podatki se zberejo in shranijo v pomnilniškem mediju potnih listov in potovalnih dokumentov za namen izdajanja takih dokumentov.
For the purpose of this Regulation the biometric features in passports and travel documents shall only be used for verifying:
Za namene te uredbe se biometrične značilnosti v potnem listu in potovalnih dokumentih uporabljajo samo za preverjanje:
the authenticity of the passport or travel document;
verodostojnosti potnega lista ali potovalnega dokumenta;
the identity of the holder by means of directly available comparable features when the passport or travel document is required to be produced by law;
identitete imetnika s pomočjo neposredno dostopnih primerljivih značilnosti, kadar mora biti potni list ali potovalni dokument izdelan po zakonu.
The checking of the additional security features shall be carried out without prejudice to Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code).
Preverjanje dodatnih varnostnih značilnosti se izvaja ne glede na člen 7(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 562/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. marca 2006 o Zakoniku Skupnosti o pravilih, ki urejajo gibanje oseb prek meja (Zakonik o schengenskih mejah).
The failure of the matching in itself shall not affect the validity of the passport or travel document for the purpose of the crossing of external borders.
Nezmožnost primerjanja sama po sebi ne vpliva na veljavnost potnega lista ali potovalnega dokumenta za namene prečkanja zunanjih meja.
The Commission shall, not later than 26 June 2012, submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report based on a large scale and in-depth study carried out by an independent authority and supervised by the Commission, which shall examine the reliability and technical feasibility, including through an evaluation of the accuracy of the systems in operation, of using the fingerprints of children under the age of 12 for identification and verification purposes, including a comparison of the false rejection rates occurring in each Member State and, based on the results of that study, an analysis of the need for common rules regarding the matching process.
Komisija najkasneje 26. junija 2012 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo, ki temelji na obsežni in poglobljeni študiji, ki jo je izvedel neodvisen organ in nadzorovala Komisija, o zanesljivosti in tehnični izvedljivosti – tudi z oceno natančnosti delujočih sistemov – uporabe prstnih odtisov otrok, mlajših od 12 let, za identifikacijo in preverjanje, vključuje pa tudi primerjavo stopenj zmotnega zavračanja, do katerih prihaja v vsaki državi članici in – na podlagi te študije – analizo o potrebi po skupnih pravilih glede procesa primerjanja.
If necessary, the report shall be accompanied by proposals to adapt this Regulation.’;
Poročilu se po potrebi priložijo predlogi za prilagoditev te uredbe.“
In Article 6, the second subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:
Drugi odstavek člena 6 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Member States shall apply this Regulation:
„Države članice uporabljajo to uredbo:
as regards the facial image: at the latest 18 months;
glede podobe obraza: najkasneje 18 mesecev
as regards fingerprints: at the latest 36 months;
glede prstnih odtisov: najkasneje 36 mesecev
following the adoption of the additional technical specifications referred to in Article 2.
po sprejetju dodatnih tehničnih zahtev iz člena 2.
Opinion of the European Parliament of 14 January 2009 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and Decision of the Council of 27 April 2009.
Mnenje Evropskega parlamenta z dne 14. januarja 2009 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in Sklep Sveta z dne 27. aprila 2009.
OJ L 105, 13.4.2006, p. 1.’;
UL L 105, 13.4.2006, str. 1.“
Without prejudice to the consequences of the application of Article 5a, Member States which, in their national law adopted before 26 June 2009, provide for an age limit below 12 years may apply that limit during a transitional period until 4 years after 26 June 2009.
Ne glede na posledice uporabe člena 5a lahko države članice, ki so v svoji nacionalni zakonodaji, sprejeti pred 26. junijem 2009 določile starostno mejo pod 12 leti, to mejo uporabljajo v prehodnem obdobju, ki traja največ 4 leta po 26. juniju 2009.
However, the age limit during the transitional period may not be below 6 years of age;
Vendar starostna meja v prehodnem obdobju ne sme biti nižja od 6 let;
The second subparagraph of Article 1(1) shall be implemented at the latest on 26 June 2012.
Drugi pododstavek člena 1(1) se začne izvajati najkasneje 26. junija 2012.
However, the initial validity for the holder of the document shall not be affected.’.
Vendar se začetna veljavnost za imetnika dokumenta ne spremeni.“.
Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009
on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community
o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti
Having regard to the Regulations establishing the common organisation of agricultural markets and the Regulations adopted pursuant to Article 308 of the Treaty applicable to goods manufactured from agricultural products, and in particular the provisions of those Regulations which allow for derogation from the general principle that protective measures at frontiers may be replaced solely by the measures provided for in those Regulations,
ob upoštevanju uredb o skupni ureditvi kmetijskih trgov in uredb, sprejetih v skladu s členom 308 Pogodbe, ki se uporabljajo za blago, izdelano iz kmetijskih proizvodov, ter zlasti določb navedenih uredb, ki omogočajo odstopanje od splošnega načela, da se lahko zaščitni ukrepi na mejah nadomestijo samo z ukrepi, predvidenimi z navedenimi uredbami,
Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] has been substantially amended several times [2].
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2026/97 z dne 6. oktobra 1997 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1], je bila večkrat [2] bistveno spremenjena.
The conclusion of the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations led to the establishment of the World Trade Organisation (WTO).
S sklenitvijo urugvajskega kroga večstranskih trgovinskih pogajanj je bila ustanovljena Svetovna trgovinska organizacija („WTO“).
Annex 1A to the Agreement establishing the WTO (hereinafter referred to as the WTO Agreement), approved by Council Decision 94/800/EC of 22 December 1994 concerning the conclusion on behalf of the European Community, as regards matters within its competence, of the agreements reached in the Uruguay Round multilateral negotiations (1986 to 1994) [3], contains, inter alia, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the GATT 1994), an Agreement on Agriculture (hereinafter referred to as the Agreement on Agriculture), an Agreement on implementation of Article VI of the GATT 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the 1994 Anti-Dumping Agreement) and an Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (hereinafter referred to as the Subsidies Agreement).
Priloga 1A k Sporazumu o ustanovitvi WTO („Sporazum WTO“), odobrenemu s Sklepom Sveta 94/800/ES z dne 22. decembra 1994 o sklenitvi sporazumov doseženih v Urugvajskem krogu večstranskih pogajanj (1986–1994), v imenu Evropske skupnosti, v zvezi z zadevami, ki so v njeni pristojnosti [3], vsebuje med drugim Splošni sporazum o carinah in trgovini iz leta 1994 („GATT iz leta 1994“), Sporazum o kmetijstvu („Sporazum o kmetijstvu“), Sporazum o izvajanju člena VI GATT iz leta 1994 (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Protidumpinški sporazum iz leta 1994“) in Sporazum o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih („Sporazum o subvencijah“).
In order to reach greater transparency and effectiveness in the application by the Community of the rules laid down in the 1994 Anti-Dumping Agreement and the Subsidies Agreement respectively, the adoption of two separate Regulations which would lay down in sufficient detail the requirements for the application of each of these commercial defence instruments has been considered as necessary.
Da bi Skupnost dosegla večjo preglednost in učinkovitost pri uporabi pravil iz Protidumpinškega sporazuma iz leta 1994 oziroma Sporazuma o subvencijah, je potrebno sprejetje dveh ločenih uredb, ki bi dovolj podrobno določili zahteve za uporabo vsakega od teh instrumentov trgovinske zaščite.
In order to ensure an adequate and transparent implementation of the rules provided for in those two Agreements, it is appropriate to transpose their language into Community legislation to the best extent possible.
Da bi se zagotovilo ustrezno in pregledno izvajanje pravil iz teh dveh sporazumov, je primerno prenesti njihov jezik v zakonodajo Skupnosti v čim večjem možnem obsegu.
Furthermore, it seems advisable to explain, in adequate detail, when a subsidy shall be deemed to exist, according to which principles it shall be countervailable (in particular whether the subsidy has been granted specifically), and according to which criteria the amount of the countervailable subsidy is to be calculated.
Poleg tega je priporočljivo dovolj podrobno razložiti, kdaj se šteje, da subvencija obstaja, v skladu s katerimi načeli se proti njej lahko uvede izravnalni ukrep (zlasti ali je subvencija dodeljena specifično) in v skladu s katerimi merili se izračuna znesek subvencije, proti kateri se lahko uvede izravnalni ukrep.
In determining the existence of a subsidy, it is necessary to demonstrate that there has been a financial contribution by a government or any public body within the territory of a country, or that there has been some form of income or price support within the meaning of Article XVI of the GATT 1994, and that a benefit has thereby been conferred on the recipient enterprise.
Pri določitvi obstoja subvencije je treba prikazati, da je vlada ali katera koli javna organizacija prispevala sredstva na ozemlju države ali da obstaja neka oblika dohodkovne ali cenovne podpore v smislu člena XVI GATT iz leta 1994 in da je podjetju prejemniku to prineslo ugodnosti.
For the calculation of the benefit to the recipient, in cases where a market benchmark does not exist in the country concerned the benchmark should be determined by adjusting the terms and conditions prevailing in the country concerned on the basis of actual factors available in that country.
Za izračun ugodnosti za prejemnika, kadar v zadevni državi ni merila tržne uspešnosti, bi bilo treba merilo uspešnosti določiti s prilagajanjem pogojev, ki prevladujejo v zadevni državi, na podlagi dejanskih dejavnikov, ki so v tej državi na voljo.
If this is not practicable because, inter alia, such prices or costs do no exist or are unreliable, then the appropriate benchmark should be determined by resorting to terms and conditions in other markets.
Če to ni izvedljivo, med drugim zato, ker takšne cene ali stroški ne obstajajo oziroma so nezanesljivi, bi se ustrezno merilo uspešnosti moralo določiti tako, da se uporabijo pogoji z drugih trgov.
It is desirable to lay down clear and detailed guidance as to the factors which may be relevant for the determination of whether the subsidised imports have caused material injury or are threatening to cause injury.
Zaželeno je, da se določijo jasne in podrobne smernice glede dejavnikov, ki so lahko primerni za ugotovitev, ali je subvencionirani uvoz povzročil znatno škodo ali grozil, da bo povzročil škodo.
In demonstrating that the volume and price levels of the imports concerned are responsible for injury sustained by a Community industry, attention should be given to the effect of other factors and in particular prevailing market conditions in the Community.
Pri dokazovanju, da so obseg in ravni cen zadevnega uvoza odgovorni za škodo, povzročeno industriji Skupnosti, bi bilo treba posvetiti pozornost učinkom drugih dejavnikov in zlasti prevladujočim tržnim pogojem v Skupnosti.
It is advisable to define the term ‘Community industry’ and to provide that parties related to exporters may be excluded from such industry, and to define the term ‘related’.
Priporočljivo je, da se opredeli izraz „industrija Skupnosti“ in določi, da so stranke, povezane z izvozniki, lahko izključene iz take industrije, ter da se opredeli izraz „povezan“.
It is also necessary to provide for countervailing duty action to be taken on behalf of producers in a region of the Community and to lay down guidelines on the definition of such region.
Predvideti je treba tudi uvedbo izravnalnih dajatev, ki jih je treba sprejeti v imenu proizvajalcev v regiji Skupnosti, in določiti smernice za opredelitev take regije.
It is necessary to lay down who may lodge a countervailing duty complaint, including the extent to which it should be supported by the Community industry, and the information on countervailable subsidies, injury and causation which such complaint should contain.
Treba je določiti, kdo lahko vloži pritožbo glede izravnalne dajatve, vključno z obsegom, v katerem bi jo morala podpreti industrija Skupnosti, in informacijami o subvencijah, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, škodi in vzročnosti, ki bi jih morala taka pritožba vsebovati.
It is also expedient to specify the procedures for the rejection of complaints or the initiation of proceedings.
Primerno je tudi določiti postopke za zavrnitev pritožb ali pobud za začetek postopka.
It is necessary to lay down the manner in which interested parties should be given notice of the information which the authorities require, and should have ample opportunity to present all relevant evidence and to defend their interests.
Treba je določiti način obveščanja zainteresiranih strank o informacijah, ki jih organi zahtevajo, in način, po katerem bi imele zadostne možnosti, da predstavijo vse ustrezne dokaze in branijo svoje interese.
It is also desirable to set out clearly the rules and procedures to be followed during the investigation, in particular the rules whereby interested parties are to make themselves known, present their views and submit information within specified time limits, if such views and information are to be taken into account.
Zaželeno je tudi, da se jasno določijo pravila in postopki, ki jih je treba upoštevati med preiskavo, zlasti pravila, na podlagi katerih se morajo zainteresirane stranke javiti, predstaviti svoje poglede in predložiti informacije v določenih rokih, če naj bi se taki pogledi in informacije upoštevali.
It is also appropriate to set out the conditions under which an interested party may have access to, and comment on, information presented by other interested parties.
Primerno je tudi določiti pogoje, v skladu s katerimi imajo zainteresirane stranke lahko dostop do informacij, ki jih predložijo druge zainteresirane stranke, ali dajo k njim svoje pripombe.
There should also be cooperation between the Member States and the Commission in the collection of information.
Države članice in Komisija bi morale sodelovati pri zbiranju informacij.
It is necessary to lay down the conditions under which provisional duties may be imposed, including conditions whereby they may be imposed no earlier than 60 days from initiation and no later than nine months thereafter.
Treba je določiti pogoje, v skladu s katerimi se lahko uvedejo začasne dajatve, vključno s pogoji, v skladu s katerimi se začasne dajatve lahko uvedejo ne prej kakor 60 dni in najpozneje devet mesecev po začetku.
Such duties may in all cases be imposed by the Commission only for a four-month period.
Komisija lahko take dajatve v vsakem primeru uvede le za obdobje štirih mesecev.