natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the interests of clarity and administrative efficiency, therefore, Regulation (EC) No 2090/2002 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 3122/94 of 20 December 1994 laying down criteria for risk analysis as regards agricultural products receiving refunds [5] should be repealed and replaced by a new coherent set of rules.
Zaradi jasnosti in upravne učinkovitosti je torej treba Uredbo (ES) št. 2090/2002 in Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 3122/94 z dne 20. decembra 1994 o določitvi meril za analizo tveganja v zvezi s kmetijskimi proizvodi, za katere se dobijo izvozna nadomestila [5], razveljaviti in nadomestiti z novimi skladnimi predpisi.
Commission Regulations (EC) No 793/2006 of 12 April 2006 laying down certain detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 247/2006 laying down specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union [6], (EC) No 967/2006 of 29 June 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 as regards sugar production in excess of the quota [7], and (EC) No 1914/2006 of 20 December 2006 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1405/2006 laying down specific measures for agriculture in favour of the smaller Aegean islands [8] refer to the application of physical checks in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 386/90 whilst export refunds are not involved.
Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 793/2006 z dne 12. aprila 2006 o nekaterih podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 247/2006 o posebnih ukrepih za kmetijstvo v najbolj oddaljenih regijah Unije [6], (ES) št. 967/2006 z dne 29. junija 2006 o podrobnih izvedbenih pravilih za Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 318/2006 glede proizvodnje izvenkvotnega sladkorja v sektorju sladkorja [7] in (ES) št. 1914/2006 z dne 20. decembra 2006 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1405/2006 o posebnih ukrepih za kmetijstvo v korist manjših egejskih otokov [8] se sklicujejo na uporabo fizičnih pregledov v skladu z Uredbo (EGS) št. 386/90, medtem ko izvozna nadomestila niso vključena.
It is therefore appropriate to specify that physical checks on operations involving other amounts and related to financial measures under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development may be carried out in accordance with this new coherent set of rules.
Zato je treba določiti, da se lahko fizični pregledi postopkov, ki se nanašajo na druge zneske ter so povezani s finančnimi ukrepi v okviru Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada in Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja, opravijo v skladu s temi novimi skladnimi predpisi.
Account should be taken of existing inspection measures, in particular those introduced by Commission Regulations (EC) No 800/1999 of 15 April 1999 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products [9] and (EC) No 2298/2001 of 26 November 2001 laying down detailed rules for the export of products supplied as food aid [10].
Upoštevati je treba obstoječe inšpekcijske ukrepe, zlasti tiste, ki sta jih uvedli uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 800/1999 z dne 15. aprila 1999 o skupnih podrobnih pravilih za uporabo sistema izvoznih nadomestil za kmetijske proizvode [9] in (ES) št. 2298/2001 z dne 26. novembra 2001 o podrobnih pravilih za izvoz proizvodov, dobavljenih kot pomoč v hrani [10].
In order to improve and harmonise the measures taken by the Member States, a Community monitoring system should stay in place, based in particular on physical spot checks of products at the time of export, including products exported under a simplified procedure, and on the scrutiny of the payment application files by the paying agencies.
Za izboljšanje in uskladitev ukrepov, ki jih sprejmejo države članice, je treba ohraniti nadzorni sistem Skupnosti, ki temelji zlasti na naključnih fizičnih pregledih proizvodov pri izvozu, vključno s proizvodi, izvoženimi po poenostavljenem postopku, in na natančnem pregledu dokumentacije za izvedbo plačil pri agencijah, ki opravljajo plačila.
To tackle the risk of substitution in the case of export declarations accepted by an internal customs office within a Member State, a minimum number of ‘substitution checks’ should be carried out by the customs office of exit from the Community.
Da bi rešili problem tveganja zamenjave, kadar izvozne deklaracije sprejme notranji carinski urad v državi članici, mora carinski urad izstopa iz Skupnosti opraviti najmanjše število „pregledov zamenjave“.
Having regard to the place where such substitution checks are carried out, they should take the form of simplified checks.
Ob upoštevanju kraja, kjer se opravljajo taki pregledi zamenjave, bi morali biti to poenostavljeni pregledi.
In order to decide whether substitution checks or specific substitution checks are required the customs office of exit should actively check that the seals are in place and not broken.
Da se odloči, ali so potrebni pregledi zamenjave ali posebni pregledi zamenjave, mora carinski urad izstopa aktivno preveriti, ali so carinske oznake pritrjene in niso zlomljene.
To ensure that customs offices of exit or the customs offices to which the T5 control copy is sent follow a uniform practice, and to avoid doubts as to the identity of the products, which is a precondition for the granting of refunds, there should be provision for a specific substitution check in cases where these customs offices have found that the seals affixed on departure have been removed other than under customs supervision or have been broken or that no dispensation from sealing has been granted.
Da bi carinski uradi izstopa ali carinski uradi, ki jim je poslan kontrolni izvod T5, izvajali enotno prakso in da bi se izognili dvomom glede istovetnosti proizvodov, kar je predpogoj za dodeljevanje izvoznih nadomestil, bi bilo treba zagotoviti poseben pregled zamenjave v primerih, ko so ti carinski uradi ugotovili, da so bile carinske oznake, pritrjene ob odhodu, odstranjene brez carinskega nadzora ali so bile zlomljene ali ni bila odobrena oprostitev označevanja.
Since in those cases there is clear suspicion of substitution, the specific substitution checks require increased attention which may include, where appropriate, a physical check on the products.
Ker v teh primerih obstaja utemeljen sum zamenjave, se ob posebnih pregledih zamenjave zahteva povečana pozornost, kar lahko zajema fizični pregled proizvodov, kadar je to primerno.
The number of physical checks should be proportionate to the number of customs export declarations per year.
Število fizičnih pregledov bi moralo biti sorazmerno s številom carinskih izvoznih deklaracij na leto.
Experience has shown that physical checks on a minimum of 5 % of export declarations is an effective, proportionate and dissuasive level, whilst allowing Member States to choose on the basis of risk management whether to attribute the minimum norm of 5 % per product sector or to all sectors with a minimum of 2 % per product sector.
Izkušnje kažejo, da so fizični pregledi pri najmanj 5 % izvoznih deklaracij učinkoviti, sorazmerni in odvračilni, države članice pa se lahko na podlagi obvladovanja tveganja odločijo, ali bodo najnižjo stopnjo 5 % uporabile za posamezni proizvodni sektor ali za vse sektorje z najmanj 2 % za posamezni proizvodni sektor.
In order to ensure full coverage of the regime, customs offices of export with very low numbers of export declarations per product sector should nevertheless ensure that each product sector is subject to at least one check.
Da se zagotovi popolna pokritost sistema, morajo carinski uradi izvoza z zelo majhnim številom izvoznih deklaracij na proizvodni sektor vseeno zagotoviti, da se za vsak proizvodni sektor opravi vsaj en pregled.
The share of export refunds allocated to goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty does not represent a high level of risk, while the number of export declarations in this sector is high.
Delež izvoznih nadomestil, dodeljen blagu, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi, ne predstavlja visoke ravni tveganja, medtem ko je število izvoznih deklaracij v tem sektorju visoko.
In order to make better use of the means of control the minimum control rate for goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty should therefore be reduced.
Da bi bolje izkoristili sredstva nadzora, je za blago, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi, treba zmanjšati najnižjo stopnjo pregledov.
For the same reason, Member States should also have the possibility to disregard export declarations relating to small quantities or an amount of refund limited to EUR 1000.
Iz istega razloga bi morale imeti države članice tudi možnost, da ne upoštevajo izvoznih deklaracij, ki se nanašajo na majhne količine ali znesek nadomestila v višini največ 1000 EUR.
Experience suggests that a minimum level of 10 % of checks on seals is effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Izkušnje kažejo, da je najmanj 10 % pregledov carinskih oznak učinkovitih, sorazmernih in odvračilnih.
The number of substitution checks and specific substitution checks by customs offices of exit should be proportionate to the number of customs guidance documents per year.
Število pregledov zamenjave in posebnih pregledov zamenjave v carinskih uradih izstopa bi moralo biti sorazmerno z letnim številom izbranih carinskih dokumentov.
Experience suggests that a minimum of 8 % of all customs guidance documents is effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Izkušnje kažejo, da je najmanj 8 % vseh izbranih carinskih dokumentov učinkovitih, sorazmernih in odvračilnih.
According to Article 4f of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code [11], customs authorities are to undertake risk management to differentiate between the levels of risk associated with products subject to customs control or supervision and to determine whether or not, and if so where, the products will be subject to specific customs controls.
V skladu s členom 4f Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 z dne 2. julija 1993 o določbah za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [11] carinski organi izvajajo obvladovanje tveganja, da se razlikuje med ravnmi tveganja v zvezi s proizvodi, ki so predmet carinske kontrole ali nadzora, ter da se določi, ali bodo proizvodi predmet posebne carinske kontrole in če bodo, kje.
Risk management includes analysis of risks as defined in Article 4(26) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92.
Obvladovanje tveganja vključuje analizo tveganja iz člena 4(26) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2913/92.
According to Article 592e of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 the competent customs office is, upon receipt of the customs declaration, to carry out appropriate risk analysis and customs controls, prior to release of the products for export.
V skladu s členom 592e Uredbe (EGS) št. 2454/93 pristojni carinski urad po prejemu carinske deklaracije in pred prepustitvijo proizvodov za izvoz izvede ustrezne analize tveganja in carinske kontrole.
Risk management is to obligatorily apply from 1 July 2009, by electronic means, according to Article 3(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1875/2006 of 18 December 2006 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code [12].
Obvladovanje tveganja se v skladu s členom 3(3) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1875/2006 z dne 18. decembra 2006 o spremembi Uredbe (EGS) št. 2454/93 o določbah za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [12] v elektronski obliki obvezno uporablja od 1. julija 2009.
Consequently customs control on export declarations as referred to in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 should from that date be subject to risk analysis.
Posledično se za carinski nadzor nad izvoznimi deklaracijami iz člena 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 800/1999 od tega datuma uporablja analiza tveganja.
Risk analysis as an optional control instrument for physical checks on export declarations was introduced in 1994 by Article 3(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 386/90, and for substitution checks in 1995 by Article 9 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2221/95 of 20 September 1995 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 386/90 as regards physical checks carried out at the time of export of agricultural products qualifying for refunds [13].
Analiza tveganja je bila kot neobvezni instrument nadzora za fizične preglede izvoznih deklaracij uvedena leta 1994 s členom 3(2) Uredbe (EGS) št. 386/90, za preglede zamenjave pa leta 1995 s členom 9 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 2221/95 z dne 20. septembra 1995 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 386/90 glede fizičnih pregledov, opravljenih pri izvozu kmetijskih proizvodov, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za plačilo izvoznih nadomestil [13].
A choice of criteria to be taken into account was laid down in Regulation (EC) No 3122/94.
Izbira meril, ki jih je treba upoštevati, je bila določena v Uredbi (ES) št. 3122/94.
The application of risk analysis is subject to data protection referred to in Article 6 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92.
Pri uporabi analize tveganja je treba upoštevati določbe o varovanju podatkov iz člena 6 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2913/92.
The specific experience built up by applying risk analysis in the framework of checks on export refunds should be maintained following the generalised introduction of risk management.
Posebne izkušnje, pridobljene z uporabo analize tveganja v okviru pregledov izvoznih nadomestil, bi bilo treba po splošni uvedbi obvladovanja tveganja ohraniti.
The organisation which, in principle, would afford the best safeguards without giving rise to economic constraints and administrative costs outweighing the prospective gains for Community finances would be one which combined physical checks on export and the auditing of accounts.
Organizacija, ki bi načelno omogočila najboljši nadzor brez povečevanja ekonomskih omejitev in upravnih stroškov, ki presegajo pričakovane koristi za finance Skupnosti, bi bila tista, ki bi združila fizične preglede pri izvozu in revidiranje računovodskih izkazov.
For this reason Member States should coordinate the physical checks with the audit to be conducted ex post facto in the undertakings concerned by the competent bodies governed by Council Regulation (EC) No 485/2008 of 26 May 2008 on scrutiny by Member States of transactions forming part of the system of financing by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund [14].
Zato bi morale države članice uskladiti fizične preglede z revizijo, ki naj bi jo v zadevnih podjetjih za nazaj opravili pristojni organi in jo ureja Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 485/2008 z dne 26. maja 2008 o pregledu transakcij, ki so del sistema financiranja Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada, s strani držav članic [14].
Commission Regulation (EC) No 159/2008 of 21 February 2008 amending Regulations (EC) No 800/1999 and (EC) No 2090/2002 as regards physical checks carried out when agricultural products qualifying for refunds are exported [15] replaced certain checking and reporting thresholds of EUR 200 by EUR 1000. It is appropriate to make EUR 1000 the threshold for relevant existing checking and reporting requirements.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 159/2008 z dne 21. februarja 2008 o spremembi uredb (ES) št. 800/1999 in (ES) št. 2090/2002 glede fizičnih pregledov, opravljenih pri izvozu kmetijskih proizvodov, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za nadomestila [15], je nekatere mejne vrednosti zneskov za preverjanje in poročanje v višini 200 EUR nadomestila s 1000 EUR. Primerno je, da se 1000 EUR določi kot mejna vrednost za ustrezne obstoječe zahteve glede preverjanja in poročanja.
For the purpose of evaluating the effectiveness of risk analysis and the application of this Regulation, the Member States are required to draft reports of the checks and to submit annual evaluations on the implementation and effectiveness of the checks carried out pursuant to this Regulation and of the procedures applied to selecting the products subject to physical checks.
Za oceno učinkovitosti analize tveganja in uporabe te uredbe morajo države članice pripraviti poročila o pregledih ter predložiti letne ocene o izvajanju in učinkovitosti pregledov, opravljenih na podlagi te uredbe, in postopkov, uporabljenih pri izbiri proizvodov, ki so podvrženi fizičnim pregledom.
Given the progress in information technology, the requirement to submit the annual report on an ISO 9660 compatible CD-ROM or equivalent data medium should be reformulated as an electronic medium which precludes rewriting of the data.
Glede na napredek informacijske tehnologije je treba zahtevo po predložitvi letnega poročila na CD-ROM-u, ki ustreza standardu ISO 9660, ali na enakovrednem elektronskem podatkovnem nosilcu preoblikovati v zahtevo po predložitvi letnega poročila na elektronskem nosilcu, ki ne omogoča ponovnega zapisa podatkov.
The application of risk management will be obligatory under the Customs Code from 1 July 2009 but some Member States may apply it earlier.
Uporaba obvladovanja tveganja bo v skladu z carinskim zakonikom obvezna od 1. julija 2009, nekatere države članice pa jo bodo morda začele uporabljati že prej.
Where appropriate risk management is in place, it is justified to permit the application of flexible control norms.
Če se uporablja primerno obvladovanje tveganja, je upravičeno dovoliti uporabo prožnih norm glede nadzora.
Member States should, therefore, be permitted to apply flexible control norms as soon as they apply appropriate risk management and notify the Commission accordingly.
Državam članicam je zato treba dovoliti uporabo prožnih norm glede nadzora, takoj ko začnejo uporabljati primerno obvladovanje tveganja in o tem ustrezno obvestijo Komisijo.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural markets,
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so skladni z mnenjem Upravljalnega odbora za skupno ureditev kmetijskih trgov –
This Regulation lays down certain procedures for monitoring whether operations conferring entitlement to the payment of export refunds and all other amounts as defined in Article 2(a) have been carried out correctly.
Ta uredba določa nekatere postopke za spremljanje, ali so bili postopki ugotavljanja upravičenosti do plačila izvoznih nadomestil in vseh drugih zneskov, kakor so opredeljeni v členu 2(a), pravilno izvedeni.
It shall apply without prejudice to the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999.
Uporablja se brez poseganja v določbe Uredbe (ES) št. 800/1999.
This Regulation shall not apply to exports involving Community or national food aid covered by Regulation (EC) No 2298/2001.
Ta uredba se ne uporablja za izvoz, ki vključuje pomoč v hrani Skupnosti ali nacionalno pomoč v hrani, zajeto v Uredbi (ES) št. 2298/2001.
‘other amounts’ means operations related to financial measures under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development pursuant to Regulations (EC) No 793/2006, (EC) No 967/2006 and (EC) No 1914/2006;
„drugi zneski“ pomenijo postopke, povezane s finančnimi ukrepi v okviru Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada in Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja v skladu z uredbami (ES) št. 793/2006, (ES) št. 967/2006 in (ES) št. 1914/2006;
‘products’ means products as defined in first indent of Article 2(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999;
„proizvodi“ pomenijo proizvode, kakor so opredeljeni v prvi alinei člena 2(1)(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 800/1999;
‘customs office of export’ means the customs office referred to in Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999;
„carinski urad izvoza“ pomeni carinski urad iz člena 5(7)(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 800/1999;
‘customs office of exit’ means the customs office referred to in Article 793(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93;
„carinski urad izstopa“ pomeni carinski urad iz člena 793(2) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2454/93;
‘customs office to which the T5 control copy is sent’ means the customs office of destination referred to in Article 912c of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 including a customs office to which an equivalent document is sent;
„carinski urad, ki mu je poslan kontrolni izvod T5“, pomeni namembni carinski urad iz člena 912c Uredbe (EGS) št. 2454/93, vključno s carinskim uradom, ki mu je poslan enakovreden dokument;
‘physical check’ means verification that the export declaration, or for other amounts documents as set out in Regulations (EC) No 793/2006, (EC) No 967/2006 and (EC) No 1914/2006, including documents submitted in support thereof, corresponds with the products as regards quantity, nature and characteristics under the conditions set out in Article 5;
„fizični pregled“ pomeni preverjanje, ali se izvozna deklaracija oziroma za druge zneske dokumenti iz uredb (ES) št. 793/2006, (ES) št. 967/2006 in (ES) št. 1914/2006, vključno s predloženo dodatno dokumentacijo, ujemajo s količino, vrsto in lastnostmi proizvodov v skladu s pogoji iz člena 5;
‘substitution check’ means a check carried out by means of a visual check, that the products correspond to the document which accompanied them from the customs office of export to the customs office of exit or the office to which the T5 control copy is sent under the conditions set out in Article 8;
„pregled zamenjave“ pomeni pregled, ki se opravi tako, da se vizualno pregleda, ali so proizvodi skladni z dokumenti, ki so jih spremljali od carinskega urada izvoza do carinskega urada izstopa ali urada, ki mu je poslan kontrolni izvod T5, v skladu s pogoji iz člena 8;
‘specific substitution check’ means a substitution check which may vary from a visual check to a physical check, to be carried out if there are doubts as to the integrity of the sealing of the export products under the conditions set out in Article 9;
„posebni pregled zamenjave“ pomeni pregled zamenjave, ki se lahko izvede kot vizualni ali fizični pregled in se opravi, kadar obstaja dvom glede neoporečnosti carinskih oznak izvoznih proizvodov, v skladu s pogoji iz člena 9;
‘visual check’ means a check by sensory perception including such checks using technical equipment;
„vizualni pregled“ pomeni pregled s čutnim zaznavanjem, ki se lahko izvede tudi s pomočjo tehnične opreme;
‘document’ means a paper, or an electronic medium approved under Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92, Commission Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 [16] or Regulation (EC) No 450/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council [17], bearing information relevant in the framework of this Regulation;
„dokument“ pomeni dokument na papirju ali elektronskem mediju, odobrenem v skladu z Uredbo (EGS) št. 2913/92, Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 885/2006 [16] ali Uredbo (ES) št. 450/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [17], na katerem so podatki, ki so pomembni v okviru te uredbe;
‘equivalent document’, in relation to a T5 control copy, means the national document referred to in Articles 8, 8a and 9 of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999, used where a national procedure is applied pursuant to Article 912a(5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93;
„enakovredni dokument“ glede na kontrolni izvod T5 pomeni nacionalni dokument iz členov 8, 8a in 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 800/1999, ki se uporabi, kadar se uporablja nacionalni postopek iz člena 912a(5) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2454/93;
‘product sectors’ are the sectors as set out in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, with the exception of cereals and rice covered by Parts I and II of Annex I to that Regulation which shall be treated as a single product sector, and goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, which shall be treated as a single product sector.
„proizvodni sektorji“ pomenijo sektorje, kakor so določeni v členu 1 Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007, razen sektorja žit in sektorja riža iz delov I in II Priloge I k navedeni uredbi, ki se obravnavata kot en sam proizvodni sektor, in blaga, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi, ki se obravnava kot en sam proizvodni sektor.
Types of checks
Vrste pregledov
Member States shall carry out:
Države članice opravljajo: