natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The award of contracts concluded in the Member States by contracting entities as referred to in Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors [5] and by contracting authorities as referred to in Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts [6] is subject to compliance with the principles of the Treaty and in particular the free movement of goods, the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services, and with the principles deriving therefrom, such as the principles of equal treatment, non-discrimination, mutual recognition, proportionality and transparency.
Za oddajo naročil, sklenjenih v državah članicah s strani naročnika iz Direktive 2004/17/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil naročnikov v vodnem, energetskem in transportnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev [5] in s strani naročnikov iz Direktive 2004/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil gradenj, blaga in storitev [6], veljajo načela Pogodbe, zlasti prosti pretok blaga, svoboda ustanavljanja in svoboda opravljanja storitev ter načela, ki izhajajo iz njih, kot so načela enakega obravnavanja, nediskriminacije, vzajemnega priznavanja, sorazmernosti in preglednosti.
Transparency and competition obligations for contracts below the application thresholds for this Directive should be determined by Member States in compliance with those principles and taking account, in particular, of situations where there is a cross-border interest.
Države članice bi morale v skladu s temi načeli in ob upoštevanju zlasti situacij, v katerih obstajajo čezmejni interesi, določiti obveznosti v zvezi s preglednostjo in konkurenčnostjo za naročila, ki ne dosegajo praga za uporabo te direktive.
In particular, it is for Member States to determine the most suitable arrangements for awarding such contracts.
Zlasti je naloga držav članic, da določijo najprimernejšo ureditev za oddajo teh naročil.
For contracts above a certain value, it is advisable to draw up provisions for the Community coordination of national procedures for the award of such contracts which are based on these principles so as to guarantee their effects and an effective opening-up of procurement to competition.
Za naročila nad določeno vrednostjo je priporočljivo sprejeti določbe o usklajevanju nacionalnih postopkov za oddajo teh naročil na ravni Skupnosti, ki temeljijo na teh načelih, da bi zagotovili njihove učinke in dejansko odpiranje naročil konkurenci.
These coordinating provisions should therefore be interpreted in accordance with both the above-mentioned rules and principles and with other rules of the Treaty.
Te usklajevalne določbe bi se zato morale razlagati v skladu z zgoraj navedenimi pravili in načeli ter drugimi pravili Pogodbe.
Articles 30, 45, 46, 55 and 296 of the Treaty make provision for specific exceptions to the application of the principles set out in the Treaty and, consequently, to the application of law derived therefrom.
Pogodba v členih 30, 45, 46, 55 in 296 določa posebne izjeme od uporabe načel, ki jih določa, in zato od izvajanja zakonodaje, ki izvira iz nje.
It therefore follows that none of the provisions of this Directive should prevent the imposition or application of any measures considered necessary to safeguard interests recognised as legitimate by these provisions of the Treaty.
Iz tega sledi, da nobena določba te direktive ne sme prepovedati, da se določijo ali izvajajo ukrepi, ki bi se izkazali kot potrebni za zaščito interesov, ki jih te določbe Pogodbe priznavajo kot legitimne.
This means in particular that the award of contracts which fall within the field of application of this Directive can be exempted from the latter where this is justified on grounds of public security or necessary for the protection of essential security interests of a Member State.
To pomeni zlasti, da je oddaja naročil, ki je zajeta v področje uporabe te direktive, lahko iz te izvzeta, kadar to upravičujejo razlogi javne varnosti ali je to potrebno za zaščito bistvenih varnostnih interesov države članice.
This can be the case for contracts in the fields of both defence and security which necessitate such extremely demanding security of supply requirements or which are so confidential and/or important for national sovereignty that even the specific provisions of this Directive are not sufficient to safeguard Member States’ essential security interests, the definition of which is the sole responsibility of Member States.
To lahko velja tako za naročila na področju obrambe kot tudi tista na področju varnosti, za katera so potrebne tako zelo stroge zahteve glede zanesljivosti oskrbe ali ki so tako zaupna in/ali pomembna za nacionalno suverenost, da tudi posebne določbe te direktive ne zadostujejo za varovanje bistvenih varnostnih interesov držav članic, opredelitev teh interesov pa je v izključni pristojnosti držav članic.
Nevertheless, in accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, the possibility of recourse to such exceptions should be interpreted in such a way that their effects do not extend beyond that which is strictly necessary for the protection of the legitimate interests that those Articles help to safeguard.
Vendar je treba v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti možnost uporabe takih izjem razlagati tako, da ne širijo svojih učinkov prek tega, kar je nujno potrebno za zaščito legitimnih interesov, katerih zaščito omogočajo navedeni členi.
Thus, the non-application of this Directive must be proportionate to the aims pursued and cause as little disturbance as possible to the free movement of goods and the freedom to provide services.
Torej, neizvajanje Direktive mora biti hkrati sorazmerno z zastavljenimi cilji in čim manj ovirati prosti pretok blaga in svobodo opravljanja storitev.
Contracts relating to arms, munitions and war material awarded by contracting authorities/entities operating in the field of defence are excluded from the scope of the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) concluded at the World Trade Organization.
Naročila orožja, streliva in vojaških sredstev, ki jih oddajo naročniki, ki delujejo na področju obrambe, so izključena iz področja uporabe Sporazuma o vladnih naročilih (Government Procurement Agreement – GPA), sklenjenega v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organizacije.
The other contracts covered by this Directive are also exempted from the application of the GPA by virtue of Article XXIII thereof.
Druga naročila, ki jih pokriva ta direktiva, so tudi izključena iz izvajanja GPA na podlagi člena XXIII Sporazuma.
Article 296 of the Treaty and Article XXIII(1) of the GPA have a different scope and are subject to different standards of judicial review.
Člen 296 Pogodbe in člen XXIII(1) GPA imata različno področje uporabe in se zato zanju uporabljajo različni standardi sodnega nadzora.
Member States may still rely on Article XXIII(1) of the GPA in situations where Article 296 of the Treaty cannot be invoked.
Države članice se lahko še vedno sklicujejo na člen XXIII(1) GPA, če ne morejo ukrepati na podlagi člena 296 Pogodbe.
The two provisions have therefore to meet different conditions for application.
Določbi morata zato izpolnjevati različne pogoje za uporabo.
This exclusion means also that in the specific context of defence and security markets, Member States retain the power to decide whether or not their contracting authority/entity may allow economic operators from third countries to participate in contract award procedures.
Ta izključitev pomeni tudi, da na specifičnem področju obrambnih in varnostnih trgov države članice zadržijo pristojnost odločanja o tem, ali lahko njihov naročnik dovoli, da gospodarski subjekti iz tretjih držav sodelujejo pri postopkih oddaje naročil.
They should take that decision on grounds of value for money, recognizing the need for a globally competitive European Defence Technological and Industrial Base, the importance of open and fair markets and the obtaining of mutual benefits.
To odločitev bi morale sprejeti na podlagi razmerja med ceno in kakovostjo, ob upoštevanju potrebe po konkurenčni bazi evropske obrambne tehnologije in industrije, pomena odprtih in poštenih trgov ter doseganju medsebojnih koristi.
Member States should press for increasingly open markets.
Države članice bi si morale prizadevati za vse večjo odprtost trgov.
Their partners should also demonstrate openness, on the basis of internationally-agreed rules, in particular as concerns open and fair competition.
Njihove partnerice bi prav tako morale izkazovati odprtost na podlagi mednarodno dogovorjenih pravil, zlasti kar zadeva odprto in pošteno konkurenco.
However, insofar as such works are incidental to the principal subject-matter of the contract, and are only a possible consequence thereof or a complement thereto, the fact that such works are included in the contract does not justify the qualification of the contract as a works contract.
Naročila storitev lahko v nekaterih primerih vključujejo gradnje. Vendar, če so te gradnje dodatne glede na osnovni predmet naročila in so njegova morebitna posledica ali dopolnilo, to ne upravičuje opredelitve naročila kot naročila gradenj.
Defence and security contracts often contain classified information which the laws, regulations or administrative provisions in force in the Member State concerned require, for security reasons, to be protected from unauthorised access.
Naročila na področju obrambe in varnosti pogosto vsebujejo zaupne informacije, za katere zakoni, uredbe ali upravne določbe, ki veljajo v državi članici, določajo, da jih je treba iz varnostnih razlogov zaščititi pred nepooblaščenim dostopom.
In the military field, the Member States have systems for classifying this information for military purposes.
Države članice imajo na vojaškem področju sisteme za klasifikacijo teh informacij za vojaške namene.
However, when it comes to non-military security matters, there is more diversity in Member States’ practice, where other information must similarly be protected.
Vendar pa obstaja na področju nevojaške varnosti več razlik v praksah držav članic, kadar se morajo druge informacijo varovati na podoben način.
Therefore, it is appropriate to make use of a concept which takes into account the diversity of practices in Member States and can encompass both the military and non-military fields.
Zato je primerno uporabiti koncept, ki upošteva raznolikost praks držav članic in omogoča vključitev vojaškega in nevojaškega področja.
At any rate, procurement in these fields should not, where appropriate, affect the obligations arising from Commission Decision 2001/844/EC, ECSC, Euratom of 29 November 2001 amending its internal Rules of Procedure [8] or Council Decision 2001/264/EC of 19 March 2001 adopting the Council’s security regulations [9].
V vsakem primeru oddaja naročil na teh področjih ne bi smela, kadar je primerno, vplivati na obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz Sklepa Komisije 2001/844/ES, ESPJ, Euratom z dne 29. novembra 2001 o spremembah njenega poslovnika [8] ali Sklepa Sveta 2001/264/ES z dne 19. marca 2001 o sprejetju predpisov Sveta o varovanju tajnosti [9].
Moreover, Article 296(1)(a) of the Treaty gives Member States the possibility to exempt contracts in the fields of both defence and security from the rules of this Directive if the application of this Directive would oblige them to supply information, the disclosure of which they consider contrary to the essential interests of their security.
Poleg tega daje člen 296(1)(a) Pogodbe državam članicam možnost, da naročila s področij obrambe in varnosti oprostijo upoštevanja določb te direktive, če bi jih uporaba te direktive obvezovala, da posredujejo informacije, katerih razkritje bi nasprotovalo bistvenim interesom njihove varnosti.
This can be the case in particular where contracts are so sensitive that their very existence must be kept secret.
Do tega lahko pride predvsem v primerih, ko so naročila tako občutljiva, da mora biti njihov obstoj skrivnost.
The contracting authorities/entities should be allowed to use framework agreements, which makes it necessary to provide a definition of framework agreements and specific rules.
Naročnikom bi bilo treba omogočiti uporabo okvirnih sporazumov, zato je treba opredeliti okvirne sporazume in posebna pravila.
Under these rules, when a contracting authority/entity enters into a framework agreement in accordance with the provisions of this Directive relating, in particular, to advertising, time-limits and conditions for the submission of tenders, it may enter into contracts based on this framework agreement during its term of validity either by applying the terms set forth in the framework agreement or, if not all terms have been fixed in advance, by reopening competition between the parties to the framework agreement.
V skladu s temi pravili lahko naročnik, ko sklene okvirni sporazum v skladu z določbami te direktive, ki zadevajo predvsem objavo, roke in pogoje za oddajo ponudb, odda naročila na podlagi tega okvirnega sporazuma med obdobjem njegove veljavnosti bodisi ob uporabi pogojev, določenih v okvirnem sporazumu, ali, če vsi pogoji niso vnaprej tam določeni, s ponovnim odpiranjem natečaja med strankami okvirnega sporazuma v zvezi s tem pogoji.
The reopening of competition should comply with certain rules, the aim of which is to guarantee the required flexibility and compliance with the general principles, in particular the principle of equal treatment.
Ponovno odpiranje natečaja bi moralo biti v skladu z nekaterimi pravili, katerih cilj je zagotoviti potrebno prožnost in spoštovanje splošnih načel, zlasti načela enakega obravnavanja.
For the same reasons, the term of framework agreements should be limited and should not exceed seven years, except in cases that are duly justified by the contracting authorities/entities.
Zaradi teh razlogov mora biti trajanje okvirnih sporazumov omejeno ne bi smelo presegati sedem let, razen v primerih, ki jih naročniki ustrezno utemeljijo.
Contracting authorities/entities may make use of electronic purchasing techniques, providing such use complies with the rules drawn up under this Directive and with the principles of equal treatment, non-discrimination and transparency.
Naročniki lahko uporabijo načine elektronskega nakupovanja, če je slednje v skladu s pravili, ki jih določa ta direktive, ter z načeli enakega obravnavanja, nediskriminacije in preglednosti.
Since use of the technique of electronic auctions is likely to increase, such auctions should be given a Community definition and governed by specific rules in order to ensure that they operate in full accordance with those principles.
Glede na to, da bo elektronskih dražb verjetno vedno več, bi bilo treba te dražbe opredeliti na ravni Skupnosti in urediti s posebnimi pravili, da bi zagotovili njihovo popolno usklajenost z navedenimi načeli.
To that end, provision should be made for such electronic auctions to deal only with contracts for works, supplies or services for which the specifications can be determined with precision.
Zaradi tega bi bilo treba za te elektronske dražbe sprejeti določbo, da naj se uporabljajo samo za naročila gradenj, blaga ali storitev, za katera se razpisna dokumentacija lahko natančno določi.
Such may in particular be the case for recurring supplies, works and service contracts.
To se lahko nanaša zlasti na ponavljajoča se naročila blaga, gradenj in storitev.
With the same objective, it must also be possible to establish the respective ranking of the tenderers at any stage of the electronic auction.
Z istim ciljem je treba tudi omogočiti določanje prednostne razvrstitve ponudnikov v kateri koli fazi elektronske dražbe.
Recourse to electronic auctions enables contracting authorities/entities to ask tenderers to submit new prices, revised downwards, and when the contract is awarded to the most economically advantageous tender, also to improve elements of the tenders other than prices.
Uporaba elektronskih dražb omogoča naročnikom, da od ponudnikov zahtevajo predložitev novih cen, popravljenih navzdol in, če se naročilo odda za ekonomsko najugodnejšo ponudbo, izboljšanje tudi drugih elementov ponudb poleg cen.
In order to guarantee compliance with the principle of transparency, only the elements suitable for automatic evaluation by electronic means, without any intervention and/or appreciation by the contracting authority/entity, may be the object of electronic auctions, that is, only the elements which are quantifiable so that they can be expressed in figures or percentages.
Zaradi zagotovitve skladnosti z načelom preglednosti so lahko predmet elektronske dražbe samo elementi, ki so primerni za avtomatsko oceno z elektronskimi sredstvi brez poseganja in/ali ocenjevanja s strani naročnika, to je samo elementi, ki so merljivi in se lahko izrazijo v številkah ali odstotkih.
On the other hand, those aspects of tenders which imply an appreciation of non-quantifiable elements should not be the object of electronic auctions.
Po drugi strani tisti vidiki ponudbe, ki vključujejo oceno nemerljivih elementov, naj ne bi bili predmet elektronskih dražb.
Consequently, certain works contracts and certain service contracts having as their subject-matter intellectual performances, such as the design of works, should not be the object of electronic auctions.
Posledično nekatera naročila gradenj in nekatera naročila storitev, katerih predmet so intelektualne storitve, kot je načrtovanje gradenj, naj ne bi bila predmet elektronskih dražb.
Centralised purchasing techniques help to increase competition and streamline purchasing.
Centralizirani načini nabav prispevajo k povečanju konkurence in poenostavijo nabavo.
Consequently, Member States should be allowed to provide that contracting authorities/entities may purchase goods, works and/or services through a central purchasing body.
Posledično bi državam članicam moralo biti omogočeno, da določijo, da lahko naročniki nabavijo blago, gradnje in/ali storitve od ali prek centralnega nabavnega organa.
Provision should therefore be made for a Community definition of central purchasing bodies and of the conditions under which, in accordance with the principles of non-discrimination and equal treatment, contracting authorities/entities purchasing works, supplies and/or services through a central purchasing body may be deemed to have complied with this Directive.
Zato bi bilo treba določiti opredelitve Skupnosti za centralne nabavne organe in pogoje, pod katerimi se lahko v skladu z načeloma nediskriminacije in enakopravnosti med ponudniki šteje, da je naročnik, za katerega nabavni organ opravlja nakupe v zvezi z gradnjami, blagom in/ali storitvami, usklajen s to direktivo.
A contracting authority/entity which is bound to apply this Directive should in any event be eligible to act as a central purchasing body.
Naročnik, ki mora uporabljati to direktivo, bi moral v vsakem primeru imeti možnost, da deluje kot centralni nabavni organ.
At the same time, Member States should also be free to designate European public bodies not subject to this Directive, such as the European Defence Agency, as central purchasing bodies, provided that such bodies apply procurement rules compliant with all the provisions of this Directive to those purchases.
Države članice bi istočasno morale imeti možnost, da določijo evropske javne organe, ki jih ne vključuje ta direktiva, kot je denimo Evropska obrambna agencija, za centralne nabavne organe, pod pogojem, da ti organi pri teh nakupih uporabljajo pravila o naročanju, ki so v skladu z določbami te direktive.
Contracting authorities/entities may find themselves obliged to award a single contract for acquisitions which is covered partially by this Directive, with the remaining part either falling within the scope of Directive 2004/17/EC or Directive 2004/18/EC or not being subject to this Directive, Directive 2004/17/EC or Directive 2004/18/EC.
Naročniki se lahko znajdejo v situaciji, ko morajo oddati enotno naročilo za nakup, ki bo deloma zajeto s to direktivo, preostanek pa bo zajet bodisi s področjem uporabe Direktive 2004/17/ES ali Direktive 2004/18/ES, ali ne bo zajet s to direktivo, z Direktivo 2004/17/ES ali Direktivo 2004/18/ES.
This applies when the relevant procurements cannot, for objective reasons, be separated and awarded through separate contracts.
Do tega pride, ko ustreznega naročila iz objektivnih razlogov ni mogoče razdeliti in jih oddati ločeno.
In such cases the contracting authorities/entities should be able to award a single contract, provided that their decision is not taken for the purpose of excluding contracts from the application of this Directive or of Directive 2004/17/EC or Directive 2004/18/EC.
V takih primerih bi morali naročniki imeti možnost oddati enotno naročilo, pod pogojem, da ta odločitev ni sprejeta z namenom izključitve naročil iz uporabe te direktive, Direktive 2004/17/ES ali Direktive 2004/18/ES.
Multiplying the number of thresholds for applying coordinated provisions complicates matters for contracting authorities/entities.
Veliko število pragov za uporabo usklajenih določb zapleta zadeve za naročnike.
Given the average value of contracts in the fields of defence and security, it is appropriate to align the application thresholds of this Directive to the thresholds that already have to be met by contracting entities in applying Directive 2004/17/EC.
Glede na povprečno vrednost naročil na področju obrambe in varnosti, je primerno uskladiti prage za uporabo te direktive s pragi, ki jih morajo naročniki upoštevati za uporabo Direktive 2004/17/ES.
The thresholds of this Directive should also be revised together with those of Directive 2004/17/EC when the latter thresholds are revised.
Prage te direktive bi bilo treba pregledati skupaj s pragi iz Direktive 2004/17/ES ob reviziji slednjih pragov.
In addition, provision should be made for cases where this Directive does not apply because specific rules on the awarding of contracts which derive from international agreements or arrangements between Member States and third countries apply.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba predvideti primere, v katerih se ta direktiva ne uporablja zaradi veljavnosti posebnih pravil o oddaji naročil, ki izhajajo iz mednarodnih sporazumov ali iz dogovorov med državami članicami in tretjimi državami.
The rules under certain agreements relating to the stationing of troops from a Member State in another Member State or a third country, or the stationing of troops from a third country in a Member State, should also preclude the use of award procedures under this Directive.
Določbe nekaterih sporazumov o namestitvi vojaških enot ene države članice v drugo državo članico ali tretjo državo ali o namestitvi vojaških enot tretje države v državo članico, bi prav tako morale onemogočiti uporabo postopkov oddaje iz te direktive.
This Directive should not apply either to contracts awarded by international organisations for their purposes or to contracts which must be awarded by a Member State in accordance with rules that are specific to such organisations.
Ta direktiva se ne bi smela uporabljati niti za naročila, ki jih oddajo mednarodne organizacije za svoje namene, niti za naročila, ki jih mora oddati država članica v skladu z določbami, ki so specifične za te organizacije.
In the fields of defence and security, some contracts are so sensitive that it would be inappropriate to apply this Directive, despite its specificity.
Nekatere pogodbe s področja obrambe in varnosti so tako občutljiva, da zanje ne bi bilo primerno uporabiti to direktivo, kljub njeni specifičnosti.
That is the case for procurements provided by intelligence services, or procurements for all types of intelligence activities, including counter-intelligence activities, as defined by Member States.
To velja za naročila, ki jih ponujajo obveščevalne službe, ali naročila za vse vrste obveščevalnih dejavnosti, vključno s protiobveščevalnimi dejavnostmi, kot jih opredeljujejo države članice.