natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Protection for those substances, listed in Part B of the register, is limited to a maximum period of five years following the date of receipt of the notification.
Varstvo snovi, navedenih v delu B registra, je omejeno na največ pet let od datuma prejema uradnega obvestila.
That period has now expired for the four remaining substances which should consequently be transferred to Part A of the register.
Navedeno obdobje se je izteklo za 4 preostale snovi, ki jih je zato treba prenesti v del A registra.
The first paragraph of the Annex to Decision 1999/217/EC, which reads as follows, should be deleted:
Črtati je treba prvi odstavek Priloge k Odločbi 199/217/ES:
‘The register of chemically defined flavouring substances has been divided into two distinct parts.
„Register kemijsko opredeljenih aromatičnih snovi je razdeljen v dva ločena dela.
Part A lists the substances according to their FL numbers.
V delu A so navedene snovi razvrščene po njihovih številkah FL.
Part B lists those substances for which confidentiality has been requested by a Member State in order to protect the intellectual property rights of the manufacturer.’
V delu B so navedene tiste snovi, za katere so države članice zahtevale zaupnost, da bi s tem zaščitile pravice intelektualne lastnine proizvajalca.“
Part A of the Annex to Decision 1999/217/EC is amended as follows:
Del A Priloge k Odločbi 1999/217/ES se spremeni:
The rows set out in the table for the substances attributed with the following FL numbers are deleted:
Vrstice v razpredelnici za snovi, ki so jim dodeljene naslednje številke FL, se črtajo:
The following rows are inserted in the table:
V razpredelnico se vstavijo naslednje vrstice:
FL No
FL št.
L-Monomenthyl glutarate
L-monomentil glutarat
1-Ethoxyethylacetate
1-etoksietilacetat
2-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy chromanone
2-(4-hidroksi-3-metoksifenil)-5,7-dihidroksi kromanon
Part B of the Annex to Decision 1999/217/EC is deleted.
Del B Priloge k Odločbi 1999/217/ES se črta.
amending the Decision of 27 March 2000 authorising the Director of Europol to enter into negotiations on agreements with third States and non-EU-related bodies
o spremembi Sklepa z dne 27. marca 2000 o pooblastilu direktorju Europola za začetek pogajanj o sporazumih s tretjimi državami in organi, ki niso povezani z EU
Having regard to Article 42(2), Article 10(4) and Article 18 of the Convention on the establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention) [1],
ob upoštevanju člena 42(2), člena 10(4) in člena 18 Konvencije o ustanovitvi Evropskega policijskega urada (Konvencija o Europolu) [1],
Having regard to the Council Act of 3 November 1998 laying down rules governing Europol’s external relations with third States and non-European Union related bodies [2], and in particular Article 2 of that Act,
ob upoštevanju Akta Sveta z dne 3. novembra 1998 o pravilih Europolovih zunanjih odnosov s tretjimi državami in organi, ki niso povezani z Evropsko unijo [2], in zlasti člena 2 Akta,
Having regard to the Council Act of 3 November 1998 laying down rules concerning the receipt of information by Europol from third parties [3], and in particular Article 2 of that Act,
ob upoštevanju Akta Sveta z dne 3. novembra 1998 o pravilih za sprejemanje podatkov od tretjih oseb pri Europolu [3] in zlasti člena 2 Akta,
On 27 March 2000 the Council adopted the Decision authorising the Director of Europol to enter into negotiations on agreements with third States and non-EU-related bodies [5].
marca 2000 je Svet sprejel Sklep o pooblastilu direktorju Europola za začetek pogajanj o sporazumih s tretjimi državami in organi, ki niso povezani z EU [5].
There are operational interests that require that India be added to the list of third States with which the Director of Europol is authorised to start negotiations.
Zaradi operativnih interesov bi bilo treba Indijo dodati na seznam tretjih držav, s katerimi je direktor Europola pooblaščen začeti pogajanja.
The Decision of 27 March 2000 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Zato bi bilo treba Sklep z dne 27. marca 2000 ustrezno spremeniti –
The Decision of 27 March 2000 is hereby amended as follows:
Sklep z dne 27. marca 2000 se spremeni:
In Article 2(1), under the heading ‘Third States’, the following State shall be added to the alphabetical list:
v členu 2(1) se pod naslovom „Tretje države“ v abecedni seznam doda naslednja država:
India’.
Indija“.
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 167 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo in zlasti člena 167,
Having regard to Council Decision 2006/524/EC, Euratom of 11 July 2006 appointing Czech, German, Estonian, Spanish, French, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Luxembourgish, Hungarian, Maltese, Austrian, Slovenian and Slovak members of the European Economic and Social Committee [1],
ob upoštevanju Sklepa 2006/524/ES, Euratom o imenovanju čeških, nemških, estonskih, španskih, francoskih, italijanskih, latvijskih, litovskih, luksemburških, madžarskih, malteških, avstrijskih, slovenskih in slovaških članov Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora [1],
Whereas a member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Erhard OTT,
ker se je zaradi odstopa Erharda OTTA sprostilo mesto člana Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora –
Mr Armin DUTTINÉ, Ver.di-Bundesvorstand — Leiter EU Verbindungsbüro, is hereby appointed to the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2010.
Armin DUTTINÉ, Ver.di Bundesvorstand – Leiter EU Verbindungsbüro, se za preostanek mandata, ki se izteče 20. septembra 2010, imenuje za člana Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora.
amending the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities as regards the language arrangements applicable to appeals against decisions of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal
o spremembi Poslovnika Sodišča prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti glede jezikovne ureditve v pritožbah zoper odločbe Sodišča za uslužbence Evropske unije
In accordance with the procedure laid down in the second subparagraph of Article 245 of the Treaty establishing the European Community and the second subparagraph of Article 160 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,
v skladu s postopkom, določenim v drugem odstavku člena 245 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in drugem odstavku člena 160 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo,
Having regard to the request of the Court of Justice of 24 September 2008,
ob upoštevanju zahteve Sodišča z dne 24. septembra 2008,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament of 13 January 2009,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega parlamenta z dne 13. januarja 2009,
Having regard to the opinion of the Commission of 18 November 2008,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije z dne 18. novembra 2008,
Whereas the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance should specify the language of the case in an appeal against a decision of the Civil Service Tribunal, as referred to in Articles 9 and 10 of the Annex to the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice,
ker je treba v Poslovniku Sodišča prve stopnje določiti jezik postopka v primeru pritožbe zoper odločbo Sodišča za uslužbence, kot je predvidena v členih 9 in 10 Priloge k Protokolu o Statutu Sodišča –
The Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 2 May 1991 (OJ L 136, 30.5.1991, p. 1, as corrected by OJ L 317, 19.11.1991, p. 34), amended on 15 September 1994 (OJ L 249, 24.9.1994, p. 17), 17 February 1995 (OJ L 44, 28.2.1995, p. 64), 6 July 1995 (OJ L 172, 22.7.1995, p. 3), 12 March 1997 (OJ L 103, 19.4.1997, p. 6, as corrected by OJ L 351, 23.12.1997, p. 72), 17 May 1999 (OJ L 135, 29.5.1999, p. 92), 6 December 2000 (OJ L 322, 19.12.2000, p. 4), 21 May 2003 (OJ L 147, 14.6.2003, p. 22), 19 April 2004 (OJ L 132, 29.4.2004, p. 3), 21 April 2004 (OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 108), 12 October 2005 (OJ L 298, 15.11.2005, p. 1), 18 December 2006 (OJ L 386, 29.12.2006, p. 45) and 12 June 2008 (OJ L 179, 8.7.2008, p. 12), are hereby amended as follows:
Poslovnik Sodišča prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti z dne 2. maja 1991 (UL L 136, 30.5.1991, str. 1, in popravek v UL L 317, 19.11.1991, str. 34), kakor je bil spremenjen 15. septembra 1994 (UL L 249, 24.9.1994, str. 17), 17. februarja 1995 (UL L 44, 28.2.1995, str. 64), 6. julija 1995 (UL L 172, 22.7.1995, str. 3), 12. marca 1997 (UL L 103, 19.4.1997, str. 6, in popravek v UL L 351, 23.12.1997, str. 72), 17. maja 1999 (UL L 135, 29.5.1999, str. 92), 6. decembra 2000 (UL L 322, 19.12.2000, str. 4), 21. maja 2003 (UL L 147, 14.6.2003, str. 22), 19. aprila 2004 (UL L 132, 29.4.2004, str. 3), 21. aprila 2004 (UL L 127, 29.4.2004, str. 108), 12. oktobra 2005 (UL L 298, 15.11.2005, str. 1), 18. decembra 2006 (UL L 386, 29.12.2006, str. 45) in 12. junija 2008 (UL L 179, 8.7.2008, str. 12), se spremeni:
before Article 137, there shall be inserted in ‘TITLE 5 — APPEALS AGAINST DECISIONS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL’ an Article 136a, to be worded as follows:
pred člen 137 se pod „NASLOV V: PRITOŽBE ZOPER ODLOČBE SODIŠČA ZA USLUŽBENCE EVROPSKE UNIJE“ vstavi člen 136a z naslednjim besedilom:
‘Article 136a
„Člen 136a
Without prejudice to the arrangements laid down in Article 35(2)(b) and (c) and the fourth subparagraph of Article 35(3) of these Rules, in appeals against decisions of the Civil Service Tribunal as referred to in Articles 9 and 10 of the Annex to the Statute of the Court of Justice, the language of the case shall be the language of the decision of the Civil Service Tribunal against which the appeal is brought.’
Če je zoper odločbo Sodišča za uslužbence na podlagi členov 9 in 10 Priloge k Statutu Sodišča vložena pritožba, je jezik postopka tisti jezik, ki je bil jezik postopka pred Sodiščem za uslužbence, brez poseganja v člen 35(2)(b) in (c) ter v četrti pododstavek člena 35(3) tega poslovnika.“
This Decision shall enter into force on the first day of the second month following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta sklep začne veljati prvi dan drugega meseca po njegovi objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
amending Annex 2, Schedule A, to the Common Consular Instructions on visas for the diplomatic missions and consular posts, in relation to visa requirements for holders of Indonesian diplomatic and service passports
o spremembi Seznama A iz Priloge 2 k Skupnim konzularnim navodilom o vizumih za diplomatsko-konzularna predstavništva v zvezi z vizumskimi obveznostmi za imetnike indonezijskih diplomatskih in službenih potnih listov
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 789/2001 of 24 April 2001 reserving to the Council implementing powers with regard to certain detailed provisions and practical procedures for examining visa applications [1], and in particular Article 1(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 789/2001 z dne 24. aprila 2001, s katero se Svetu pridržijo izvedbena pooblastila v zvezi z nekaterimi podrobnejšimi predpisi in praktičnimi postopki preverjanja prošenj za vizume [1] in zlasti člena 1(1) Uredbe,
Having regard to the initiative of Austria,
ob upoštevanju pobude Avstrije,
Annex 2, Schedule A, to the Common Consular Instructions on visas for the diplomatic missions and consular posts [2] contains the list of countries whose nationals are not subject to a visa requirement in one or more Schengen States when they are holders of diplomatic, official or service passports, but who are subject to this requirement when they are holders of ordinary passports.
V Seznamu A iz Priloge 2 k Skupnim konzularnim navodilom o vizumih za diplomatsko-konzularna predstavništva [2] so navedene države, katerih državljani ne potrebujejo vizuma v eni ali več schengenskih državah, če so imetniki diplomatskega ali službenega potnega lista, vendar pa vizum potrebujejo, če so imetniki navadnega potnega lista.
Austria wishes to exempt holders of Indonesian diplomatic and service passports from visa requirements.
Avstrija želi, da se imetnike indonezijskih diplomatskih ali službenih potnih listov izvzame iz vizumske obveznosti.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision, and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te odločbe, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja.
Given that this Decision builds upon the Schengen acquis under the provisions of Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark shall, in accordance with Article 5 of the said Protocol, decide within a period of six months after the Council has adopted this Decision whether it will implement it in its national law.
Ker ta odločba nadgrajuje schengenski pravni red v skladu z določbami naslova IV tretjega dela Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, se Danska v skladu s členom 5 navedenega protokola v šestih mesecih od sprejetja te odločbe odloči, ali bo to odločbo prenesla v svoje notranje pravo.
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded between the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters’ association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [3], which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point B of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of that Agreement [4].
Ta odločba predstavlja za Islandijo in Norveško razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško o pridružitvi obeh k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [3], ki sodijo na področje iz točke B člena 1 Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES z dne 17. maja 1999 o nekaterih izvedbenih predpisih za uporabo navedenega sporazuma [4].
This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [5]; the United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Ta odločba predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, pri katerem Združeno kraljestvo ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/365/ES z dne 29. maja 2000 o prošnji Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [5]; Združeno kraljestvo torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega akta, ki zanj ni zavezujoč in se v njem ne uporablja.
This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland’s request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [6]; Ireland is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Ta odločba predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, pri katerem Irska ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2002/192/ES z dne 28. februarja 2002 o prošnji Irske, da sodeluje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [6]; Irska torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega akta, ki zanjo ni zavezujoč in se v njej ne uporablja.
As regards Switzerland, this Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [7] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point B of Decision 1999/437/EC, read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/146/EC [8].
Ta odločba predstavlja za Švico razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [7], ki sodijo na področje iz točke B člena 1 Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES, v povezavi s členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2008/146/ES [8].
As regards Liechtenstein, this Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point B of Decision 1999/437/EC, read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/261/EC [9].
Ta odločba predstavlja za Lihtenštajn razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Protokola, med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda, ki sodijo na področje iz točke B člena 1 Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES v povezavi s členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2008/261/ES [9].
As regards Cyprus, this Decision constitutes an act building upon the Schengen acquis or otherwise related to it within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the 2003 Act of Accession.
Ta odločba za Ciper predstavlja akt, ki temelji na schengenskem pravnem redu oziroma je z njim kako drugače povezan v smislu člena 3(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2003.
This Decision constitutes an act building upon the Schengen acquis or otherwise related to it within the meaning of Article 4(2) of the 2005 Act of Accession,
Ta odločba predstavlja akt, ki temelji na schengenskem pravnem redu oziroma je z njim kako drugače povezan v smislu člena 4(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2005 –
In Annex 2, Schedule A, to the Common Consular Instructions, the letters ‘D’ and ‘S’ shall be inserted in the ‘AT’ column against the entry for Indonesia.
V Seznamu A iz Priloge 2 k Skupnim konzularnim navodilom se v stolpcu „AT“ za Indonezijo vneseta črki „D“ in „S“.
This Decision shall apply from 1 March 2009.
Ta odločba se uporablja od 1. marca 2009.
adapting Annex VIII to the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania
o prilagoditvi Priloge VIII k Aktu o pristopu Bolgarije in Romunije
Article 70 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) establishes the rates of the Community financial contribution for each axis.
S členom 70 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1698/2005 z dne 20. septembra 2005 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) je odstotek finančnega prispevka Skupnosti določen na ravni osi.
Section IV of Annex VIII to the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania, as amended by Council Decision 2006/664/EC of 19 June 2006 adapting Annex VIII to the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania, establishes, by way of derogation from Article 70 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, the rates per axis of the Community support granted in Bulgaria and Romania for rural development under the EAFRD.
V oddelku IV Priloge VIII k Aktu o pristopu Bolgarije in Romunije, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom Sveta 2006/664/ES z dne 19. junija 2006 o prilagoditvi Priloge VIII k Aktu o pristopu Republike Bolgarije in Romunije, so z odstopanjem od člena 70 Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 po osi določeni odstotki prispevka Skupnosti, ki se v okviru EKSRP dodeli Bolgariji in Romuniji za razvoj podeželja.
Such contribution may amount to 80 % for axis 1 and axis 3 as well as for technical assistance, and to 82 % for axis 2.
Takšen prispevek lahko znaša do 80 % za osi 1 in 3 ter tehnično pomoč ter do 82 % za os 2.
The co-financing rates specified per axis cannot apply to the amounts that, as provided for in Section I, sub-section E, of Annex VIII to the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania, may be granted to farmers eligible for complementary national direct payments or aids under Article 143c of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers.
Stopnje sofinanciranja na ravni osi se ne morejo uporabljati za zneske, ki se – kot je določeno v pododdelku E oddelka I Priloge VIII k Aktu o pristopu Bolgarije in Romunije – dodelijo kmetom, upravičenim do dopolnilnih nacionalnih neposrednih plačil ali pomoči v skladu s členom 143c Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete.
The maximum financial contribution of the Community to complements to direct payments amounts needs to be specified also for the purpose of applying Commission Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 of 15 December 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), Annex II to which provides for an indicative financial breakdown by rural development axis and measure, including the measure ‘complements to direct payments’.
Najvišji finančni prispevek Skupnosti k dopolnilom k zneskom neposrednih plačil je treba določiti tudi za uporabo Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1974/2006 z dne 15. decembra 2006 o podrobnih pravilih glede uporabe Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1698/2005 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP), ki v Prilogi II določa okvirno finančno razčlenitev po osi in ukrepu za razvoj podeželja, vključno z ukrepom „dopolnila k neposrednim plačilom“.
With a view to maintain the results of the accession negotiations and the consistency of the co-financing rates system after technical adaptations has been done to the regulations concerning rural development, the maximum financial contribution of the Community to complements to direct payments amounts should be fixed at the same percentage as for axis 1 and 3 as well as for the technical assistance,
Da bi ohranili rezultate pristopnih pogajanj in usklajenost sistema stopenj sofinanciranja po tehničnih prilagoditvah predpisov v zvezi z razvojem podeželja, je treba najvišji finančni prispevek Skupnosti k dopolnilom k neposrednim plačilom določiti pri enakih odstotkih za os 1 in 3 ter za tehnično pomoč.
In Annex VIII to the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania, Section IV shall be replaced by the following:
V Prilogi VIII Akta o pristopu Bolgarije in Romunije se IV. oddelek nadomesti z:
‘By way of derogation from Article 70(3)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, the financial contribution of the Community may amount to 80 % for axis 1 and 3, the technical assistance measure and the complements to direct payments.
„Z odstopanjem od člena 70(3)(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 lahko finančni prispevek Skupnosti znaša do 80 % za osi 1 in 3, tehnično pomoč kot tudi za dopolnila k neposrednim plačilom.
By way of derogation from Article 70(3)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, the financial contribution of the Community may amount to 82 % for axis 2.’
Z odstopanjem od člena 70(3)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 lahko finančni prispevek Skupnosti za os 2 znaša do 82 %.“
OJ L 277, 9.10.2006, p. 4.
UL L 277, 9.10.2006, str. 4.