natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(notified under document number C(2009) 3392)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 3392)
It is stipulated in Annex I.2(c) to Directive 2002/56/EC that the number of plants showing symptoms of severe virus infection in the direct progeny must not exceed 10 %.
Priloga I.2(c) k Direktivi 2002/56/ES določa, da število rastlin, ki kažejo simptome težke virusne okužbe v neposrednem potomstvu, ne sme presegati 10 %.
In Sweden the quantity of available seed potatoes of the category ‘certified seed potatoes’ suitable to the national environmental conditions which satisfy the above requirement is insufficient and is therefore not adequate to meet the needs of that Member State.
Na Švedskem je količina razpoložljivega semenskega krompirja kategorije „certificiran semenski krompir“, ki ustreza nacionalnim okoljskim razmeram in izpolnjuje zgornjo zahtevo, nezadostna in zato ne more zadovoljiti potreb navedene države članice.
It is not possible to meet the demand for seed potatoes with seed potatoes from other Member States or from third countries which satisfy all the requirements laid down in Directive 2002/56/EC.
Povpraševanju po semenskem krompirju ni mogoče zadostiti s semenskim krompirjem iz drugih držav članic ali tretjih držav, ki izpolnjujejo vse zahteve iz Direktive 2002/56/ES.
Accordingly, Sweden should be authorised to permit the marketing of seed potatoes subject to less stringent requirements for a period expiring on 30 June 2009.
Zato je treba Švedsko pooblastiti, da do 30. junija 2009 dovoli trženje semenskega krompirja, za katerega bodo veljale manj stroge zahteve.
In addition, other Member States, which are in a position to supply Sweden with seed potatoes irrespective of whether the seed potatoes were harvested in a Member State or in a third country, should be authorised to permit the marketing of such seed potatoes.
Poleg tega je treba druge države članice, ki lahko Švedski dobavijo semenski krompir, pooblastiti, da dovolijo trženje semenskega krompirja, ne glede na to, ali je bil pridelan v državi članici ali v tretji državi.
The marketing in the Community of seed potatoes of the category ‘certified seed potatoes’ which do not satisfy the requirements laid down in Directive 2002/56/EC in respect of the number of plants showing symptoms of severe virus infection in the direct progeny shall be permitted, for a period expiring on 30 June 2009, in accordance with the terms set out in the Annex to this Decision and subject to the following conditions:
Trženje semenskega krompirja kategorije „certificiran semenski krompir“, ki ne izpolnjuje zahtev iz Direktive 2002/56/ES glede števila rastlin s simptomi težke virusne okužbe v neposrednem potomstvu, v Skupnosti se dovoli do 30. junija 2009 pod pogoji iz Priloge k tej odločbi in pod naslednjimi pogoji:
the number of plants showing symptoms of severe virus infection in the direct progeny of seed potatoes of the category ‘certified seed potatoes’ does not exceed the percentage set out in the Annex;
število rastlin semenskega krompirja kategorije „certificiran semenski krompir“ s simptomi težke virusne okužbe v neposrednem potomstvu ne presega deleža, določenega v Prilogi;
the official label states the percentage of plants showing symptoms of severe virus infection in the direct progeny of seed potatoes of the category ‘certified seed potatoes’ ascertained in the official examination pursuant to Article 2(c)(iv) of Directive 2002/56/EC;
uradna oznaka navaja delež rastlin semenskega krompirja kategorije „certificiran semenski krompir“ s simptomi težke virusne okužbe v neposrednem potomstvu, ugotovljen z uradnim pregledom v skladu s členom 2(c)(iv) Direktive 2002/56/ES;
seed potatoes are placed on the market in accordance with Article 2 of this Decision.
semenski krompir se da v promet v skladu s členom 2 te odločbe.
The Member State concerned shall authorise the supplier to place those seed potatoes on the market, unless:
Zadevna država članica dovoli dobavitelju, da navedeni semenski krompir da v promet, razen če:
there is sufficient evidence to doubt whether the supplier is able to place on the market the amount of seed potatoes for which he has applied for authorisation; or
obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi za dvom, da bo dobavitelj lahko dal v promet količino semenskega krompirja, za katero je zaprosil za dovoljenje, ali
The Member States shall assist each other administratively in the application of this Decision.
Države članice si vzajemno nudijo upravno pomoč pri uporabi te odločbe.
Sweden shall act as coordinating Member State in order to ensure that the total amount authorised does not exceed the maximum quantity specified in the Annex.
Švedska prevzame vlogo države članice koordinatorke za zagotovitev, da skupna odobrena količina ne presega največje količine, določene v Prilogi.
Member States shall immediately notify the Commission and the other Member States of the quantities in respect of which they have granted marketing authorisation pursuant to this Decision.
Države članice takoj uradno obvestijo Komisijo in druge države članice o količinah, za katere so izdale dovoljenje za trženje na podlagi te odločbe.
Number of plants showing symptoms of severe virus infection in the direct progeny
Število rastlin s simptomi težke virusne okužbe v neposrednem potomstvu
Potato
krompir
(starch varieties) Seresta
(sorte škrobnega krompirja) Seresta
of 11 May 2009
z dne 11. maja 2009
setting the amounts which, pursuant to Council Regulations (EC) No 1782/2003, (EC) No 378/2007, (EC) No 479/2008 and (EC) No 73/2009 are made available to the EAFRD and the amounts available for EAGF expenditure
o določitvi zneskov, ki bodo na voljo EKSRP v skladu z uredbami Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003, (ES) št. 378/2007, (ES) št. 479/2008 in (ES) št. 73/2009, ter zneskov, ki bodo na voljo za odhodke EKJS
Certain amounts available for the budget years 2007 to 2013 to the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) are set out in the Annex to Commission Decision 2006/410/EC of 24 May 2006 setting the amounts which, pursuant to Articles 10(2), 143d and 143e of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, Article 4(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 378/2007 and Article 23(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 are made available to the EAFRD and the amounts available for EAGF expenditure [2].
Nekateri zneski, dani na voljo Evropskemu kmetijskemu skladu za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) za proračunska leta 2007–2013 v skladu s členi 10(2), 143d in 143e Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003, členom 4(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 378/2007 in členom 23(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 479/2008, so določeni v Prilogi k Sklepu Komisije 2006/410/ES z dne 24. maja 2006 ter bodo na voljo EKSRP in za odhodke EKJS [2].
Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers [3], has been repealed and replaced by Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 [4] as from 1 January 2009.
Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete [3] je s 1. januarjem 2009 razveljavila in nadomestila Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 z dne 19. januarja 2009 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor za kmete v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete, spremembi uredb (ES) št. 1290/2005, (ES) št. 247/2006, (ES) št. 378/2007 in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 [4].
Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 has introduced in its Article 7 new increased rates for compulsory modulation.
V členu 7 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 so uvedene nove povečane stopnje za obvezno modulacijo.
In accordance with Article 1(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 378/2007 of 27 March 2007 laying down rules for voluntary modulation of direct payments [5] the increase in compulsory modulation rates has to be deducted from the voluntary modulation rate.
V skladu s členom 1(5) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 378/2007 z dne 27. marca 2007 o pravilih za prostovoljno modulacijo neposrednih plačil [5] se povečane stopnje za obvezno modulacijo odštejejo od stopenj prostovoljne modulacije.
Consequently, the amounts of voluntary and compulsory modulation to be made available to the EAFRD have changed.
Zato so se zneski prostovoljne in obvezne modulacije, ki bodo na voljo EKSRP, spremenili.
In the interest of clarity Decision 2006/410/EC should be repealed and replaced by a new text,
Zaradi jasnosti je treba Sklep 2006/410/ES razveljaviti in ga nadomestiti z novim besedilom –
The amounts available for the budget years 2007 to 2013 to the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) pursuant to Articles 10(2) and 143d of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 378/2007, Article 23(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 [6] and Articles 9(1), 10(3), 134 and 135 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, as well as the net balance available for European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) expenditure are set out in the Annex to this Decision.Article 2
Zneski, dani na voljo Evropskemu kmetijskemu skladu za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) za proračunska leta 2007–2013 v skladu s členoma 10(2) in 143d Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003, členom 4(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 378/2007, členom 23(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 479/2008 [6] ter členi 9(1), 10(3), 134 in 135 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009, in razpoložljivi neto zneski za odhodke Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada (EKJS) so določeni v Prilogi k temu sklepu.Člen 2
Decision 2006/410/EC is repealed.
Sklep 2006/410/ES se razveljavi.
Done at Brussels, 11 May 2009.
V Bruslju, 11. maja 2009
Article 9(1) and 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009
Člena 9(1) in 10(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009
Article 134 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009
Člen 134 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009
Article 135 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009
Člen 135 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009
on State aid C 22/07 (ex N 43/07) as regards the extension to dredging and cable-laying activities of the regime exempting maritime transport companies from the payment of the income tax and social contributions of seafarers in Denmark
o državni pomoči C 22/07 (ex N 43/07) glede razširitve danskega sistema, v okviru katerega so podjetja za pomorski promet oproščena plačila dohodnine in prispevkov za socialno varnost za pomorščake, na dejavnosti poglabljanja dna in polaganja kablov
(notified under document number C(2008) 8886)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 8886)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provision(s) cited above [1] and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo pripombe v skladu z navedenimi členi [1], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
By letter of 15 January 2007 [2], Denmark notified the Commission of an amendment to the regime exempting ship-owners from the payment in Denmark of the income tax of their seafarers (the so-called DIS regime).
Danska je z dopisom z dne 15. januarja 2007 [2] Komisiji priglasila spremembo sistema, v okviru katerega so lastniki ladij na Danskem oproščeni plačila dohodnine za svoje pomorščake (tako imenovani sistem DIS).
The DIS regime was authorised by Commission decision of 13 November 2002 [3].
Komisija je sistem DIS odobrila z Odločbo z dne 13. novembra 2002 [3].
The notified amendment has been registered under N 43/07.
Priglašena sprememba je bila evidentirana pod referenčno oznako N 43/07.
By letter of 27 March 2007 [4], Denmark transmitted to the Commission new information that was requested by letter of 20 March 2007 [5].
Danska je z dopisom z dne 27. marca 2007 [4] Komisiji poslala nove informacije, ki jih je ta zahtevala v dopisu z dne 20. marca 2007 [5].
By letter dated 10 July 2007 [6], the Commission informed Denmark of the opening of a formal investigation procedure, pursuant to Article 4(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [7] (hereinafter the State Aid Procedure Regulation) Denmark submitted its comments by letter dated 5 September 2007 [8].
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 10. julija 2007 [6] Dansko obvestila o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave v skladu s členom 4(4) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Uredba o postopku državne pomoči) [7]. Danska je pripombe poslala v dopisu z dne 5. septembra 2007 [8].
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [9].
Odločitev Komisije, da sproži postopek, je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [9].
By this decision, the Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measures under examination.
Komisija je pozvala vse zainteresirane strani, naj predložijo pripombe o proučevanih ukrepih.
The Commission received comments from the following interested parties: the European Dredgers’ Association, the European Community Ship-owners Association, the Chamber of British Shipping, the Norwegian Ship-owner association, Armateurs de France, Alcatel-Lucent and the Danish Shipowners’ Association.
Komisija je prejela pripombe naslednjih zainteresiranih strani: Evropskega združenja za čiščenje in poglabljanje morskega dna (EUDA), Združenja ladjarjev Evropske skupnosti (ECSA), britanske pomorske zbornice za ladijski promet (Chamber of British Shipping), združenja norveških ladjarjev, združenja francoskih ladjarjev (Armateurs de France), družbe Alcatel-Lucent in združenja danskih ladjarjev.
The Commission forwarded their respective comments to Denmark, which was given the opportunity to react.
Komisija je njihove pripombe poslala Danski in ji omogočila, da nanje odgovori.
Denmark sent its comments by letter dated 9 January 2008 [10].
Danska je poslala pripombe v dopisu z dne 9. januarja 2008 [10].
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE NOTIFIED MEASURES
PODROBEN OPIS PRIGLAŠENIH UKREPOV
The description of the notified measures was already set out in the aforementioned decision of 10 July 2007.
Priglašeni ukrepi so bili opisani že v navedeni odločbi z dne 10. julija 2007.
Description of the notified amendment to the DIS regime
Opis priglašene spremembe sistema DIS
The main purpose of the notified measures (Bill No L 110 (2006-07), Section 11) is to extend the so-called DIS regime to seafarers working on board cable-layers and dredgers.
Glavni namen priglašenih ukrepov (zakonski predlog št. L 110 (2006–2007), oddelek 11) je razširiti tako imenovani sistem DIS na pomorščake, ki delajo na ladjah za polaganje kablov in plavajočih bagrih.
With respect to cable-laying vessels, their activities have not been so far eligible for the DIS regime, although cable-layers were allowed to register in the DIS register under the Danish legislation.
Dejavnosti plovil za polaganje kablov do zdaj niso bile upravičene do ugodnosti sistema DIS, čeprav je bilo ladje za polaganje kablov v skladu z dansko zakonodajo mogoče vpisati v register DIS.
Denmark wants from now on to extend the full advantage of the DIS regime to cable-layers.
Danska želi od zdaj vse ugodnosti sistema DIS razširiti na ladje za polaganje kablov.
With respect to dredgers, an Executive Order of 27 May 2005 implementing the DIS regime (hereinafter the Executive Order) specifies what can be considered as maritime transport for the dredging industry with a view to establishing rules for the eligibility of dredging activities.
Za plavajoče bagre je v Odredbi z dne 27. maja 2005 o izvajanju sistema DIS (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Odredba) natančno določeno, katere dejavnosti bagrov se lahko štejejo za pomorski prevoz, s čimer so bila uvedena pravila za upravičenost dejavnosti poglabljanja dna.
Pursuant to Section 13 of the Executive Order, the following activities of dredgers are regarded as maritime transport:
V skladu z oddelkom 13 Odredbe se naslednje dejavnosti plavajočih bagrov štejejo za pomorski prevoz:
sailing between the port and the extraction site;
plutje med pristaniščem in krajem izkopavanja;
sailing between the place of extraction and the place where the extracted materials are to be unloaded, including the unloading itself;
plutje med krajem izkopavanja in krajem, kjer se izkopani material raztovarja, vključno s samim raztovarjanjem;
sailing between the place of unloading and the port;
plutje med krajem raztovarjanja in pristaniščem;
sailing at and between places of extraction;
plutje na kraje izkopavanja in med njimi;
sailing to provide assistance at the request of public authorities in connection with clearing up after oil spills etc.
plutje, ki je na zahtevo javnih organov potrebno za nudenje pomoči pri čiščenju po izlitju nafte itn.
Under the current Danish law, sand dredgers cannot be registered in the DIS register.
V skladu s trenutno dansko zakonodajo plavajočih bagrov ni mogoče vpisati v register DIS.
Sand dredgers therefore cannot meet the basic conditions for applying for the DIS regime.
Plavajoči bagri zato ne morejo izpolnjevati osnovnih pogojev za uporabo sistema DIS.
Since, in addition, sand dredgers are to a certain extent used for, e.g. construction work in territorial waters – Denmark has found it difficult to include sand dredgers in the general net wages scheme.
Poleg tega Danska do zdaj plavajočih bagrov ni mogla vključiti v splošni sistem neto plač, saj se ti do določene mere uporabljajo npr. pri gradbenih delih v teritorialnih vodah.
Instead, Denmark decided to tax persons working on board sand dredgers according to the taxation general rules and subsequently to refund the tax to the vessel owners once the conditions for this are met.
Danska se je namesto tega odločila, da bo delavce, ki delajo na plavajočih bagrih, obdavčila v skladu s splošnimi davčnimi pravili in da bo lastnikom plovil vrnila davek, ko bodo pogoji za to izpolnjeni.
So dredging is indirectly covered by the DIS regime and benefits from the same advantages as those benefiting maritime transport companies operating vessels registered in the DIS register.
Tako je poglabljanje dna posredno zajeto v sistemu DIS in upravičeno do enakih ugodnosti, kot so jih deležna podjetja za pomorski promet, ki upravljajo plovila, vpisana v register DIS.
Description of the existing DIS regime
Opis obstoječega sistema DIS
The DIS regime was described in the aforementioned Commission decision of 10 July 2007 [11].
Sistem DIS je bil opisan v navedeni odločbi Komisije z dne 10. julija 2007 [11].
The existing regime consists of an exemption – for ship-owners — from the payment of social contributions and income tax of their seafarers working on board ships registered in the Dansk Internationalt Skibsregister, the Danish International Register of Shipping (hereinafter referred to as the DIS register) when the ships are used for the commercial transport of passengers or goods.
V okviru obstoječega sistema so lastniki ladij oproščeni plačila prispevkov za socialno varnost in dohodnine za pomorščake, ki delajo na ladjah, vpisanih v Danski mednarodni ladijski register (DIS – Dansk Internationalt Skibsregister, v nadaljnjem besedilu: register DIS), če se ladje uporabljajo za komercialni prevoz oseb ali blaga.
It is a condition that the tax exemption is taken into account when the wages are set.
Pogoj je, da se davčna oprostitev upošteva pri določitvi plač.
The tax benefit thus accrues to the shipping company and not to the individual seafarers.
Davčne ugodnosti je torej deležen ladjar in ne posamezni pomorščaki.
The DIS regime was nevertheless approved by the Commission on 13 November 2002.
Komisija je sistem DIS 13. novembra 2002 kljub temu odobrila.
Denmark also applies at present one other scheme in favour of maritime transport operators: the tonnage tax scheme [12].
Danska trenutno izvaja še eno shemo v korist prevoznikov v pomorskem prometu: shemo davka na tonažo [12].
The entire budget of the DIS regime is around DKK 600 million.
Celotni proračun sistema DIS znaša približno 600 milijonov DKK.
REASONS FOR OPENING THE INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE
RAZLOGI ZA SPROŽITEV FORMALNEGA POSTOPKA PREISKAVE
Doubts about the compatibility of the measures concerning cable laying
Dvomi o združljivosti ukrepov v zvezi s polaganjem kablov
In its opening decision, the Commission considered that it should examine the potential economic effects that the extension in question may have on the sector concerned.
Komisija je v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka menila, da mora proučiti morebitne ekonomske učinke, ki bi jih lahko zadevna razširitev imela na zadevni sektor.
The sector concerned is the laying of telecom or energy cables on the sea bed and the repairing of existing cables on the sea bed.
Zadevni sektor obsega polaganje telekomunikacijskih ali energetskih kablov na morsko dno in popravilo obstoječih kablov na morskem dnu.
The Commission considered it impossible to divide a given maritime voyage into a part falling under the notion of maritime transport and a part excluded thereof.
Komisija je menila, da je določeno morsko plovbo nemogoče razčleniti na del, ki se šteje za pomorski prevoz, in del, ki je iz tega izključen.
It supported rather the view that it is necessary for all kinds of maritime activities, to undertake a global assessment in order to conclude whether or not a voyage at sea examined falls entirely within the notion of maritime transport.
Po njenem mnenju je treba vsako pomorsko dejavnost oceniti v širšem smislu, šele nato se lahko sklepa, ali je proučena plovba po morju v celoti zajeta v pojmu pomorskega prevoza.
As a consequence, the Commission expressed in the decision for formal opening of the procedure the opinion that the laying of cables at sea might not be construed as the superposition of a maritime transport service and of the effective laying of cables at sea.
Komisija je zato v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka menila, da se polaganja kablov na morju ne more razčleniti na dejavnosti pomorskega prevoza in dejansko polaganje kablov na morju.
Therefore, cable-laying vessels do not appear to deliver straightforward maritime transport services, within the meaning of these EC Regulations, that is to say the carriage of goods by sea between any port of a Member State and any port or off-shore installation of another Member State.
Zato plovila za polaganje kablov očitno ne zagotavljajo neposrednih storitev pomorskega prevoza v smislu navedenih uredb ES, torej prevoza blaga po morju med katerim koli pristaniščem države članice in katerim koli pristaniščem ali plavajočo napravo druge države članice.
Even if such vessels may occasionally transport goods by sea, as provided for in the Regulations (EEC) No 4055/86 and (EEC) No 3577/92, this activity corresponding to the definition of maritime transport appears to be merely ancillary to their main activity which consists in laying cables.
Čeprav lahko taka plovila občasno prevažajo blago po morju, kot je določeno v uredbah (EGS) št. 4055/86 in (EGS) št. 3577/92, se zdi, da je ta dejavnost, ki ustreza opredelitvi pomorskega prometa, samo pomožna dejavnost ob njihovi glavni dejavnosti, ki obsega polaganje kablov.
In addition, the Commission noted at that stage that it was not yet proven that cable-laying companies established within the Community suffered from the same competitive constraints as those of maritime transport operators on the world market.
Komisija je poleg tega navedla, da še ni dokazano, da so podjetja s sedežem v Skupnosti, ki polagajo kable, izpostavljena enakemu konkurenčnemu pritisku kot pomorski prevozniki na svetovnem trgu.
According to the Commission, it is not clear whether Community cable-layers face a competition, exerted by flags of convenience, of the same intensity as that characterizing maritime transport.
Kot navaja Komisija, ni jasno, ali so ladje Skupnosti za polaganje kablov zaradi ladij, ki plujejo pod zastavo ugodnosti, izpostavljene enako močni konkurenci kot pri pomorskem prevozu.