natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This decision is without prejudice to future conformity decisions pursuant to Article 32(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005.
Ta odločba ne posega v prihodnje odločbe o skladnosti s členom 32(8) Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005.
If that decision has been taken within four years of the primary administrative or judicial finding or within eight years if the recovery is taken to the national courts, 100 % of the financial consequences of the non-recovery should be borne by the Community budget.
Če je takšna odločitev sprejeta v štirih letih po prvi upravni ali sodni ugotovitvi ali v osmih letih, če je izterjava v postopku pred nacionalnimi sodišči, se 100 % finančnih posledic zaradi neizvršene izterjave krije iz proračuna Skupnosti.
In the summary report referred to in Article 32(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, the amounts for which the Member State decided not to pursue recovery and the grounds for the decision are shown.
V poročilu iz člena 32(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 so navedeni zneski, za katere so se države članice odločile, da jih ne bodo izterjale, in razlogi za takšno odločitev.
These amounts are not charged to the Member States concerned and are consequently borne by the Community budget.
Ti zneski niso v breme državam članicam in se zato krijejo iz proračuna Skupnosti.
With the exception of the paying agencies referred to in Article 2, the accounts of the paying agencies of the Member States concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) in respect of the 2008 financial year, are hereby cleared.
Razen plačilnih agencij iz člena 2 se obračuni plačilnih agencij držav članic v zvezi z izdatki, ki jih financira Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad (EKJS) za proračunsko leto 2008, potrdijo.
The amounts which are recoverable from or payable to each Member State pursuant to this Decision, including those resulting from the application of Article 32(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, are set out in Annex I.
Zneski, ki se izterjajo od vsake države članice ali izplačajo vsaki državi članici v skladu s to odločbo, vključno s tistimi, ki izhajajo iz uporabe člena 32(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005, so opredeljeni v Prilogi I.
For the 2008 financial year, the accounts of the Member States' paying agencies in respect of expenditure financed by the EAGF, set out in Annex II, are disjoined from this Decision and shall be the subject of a future clearance of accounts Decision.
Za proračunsko leto 2008 se obračuni plačilnih agencij držav članic za izdatke, ki jih financira EKJS, opredeljeni v Prilogi II, izključijo iz te odločbe in bodo obravnavani v prihodnji odločbi o potrditvi obračunov.
FINANCIAL YEAR 2008
PRORAČUNSKO LETO 2008
NB: Nomenclature 2009: 05 07 01 06, 05 02 16 02, 6701, 6702, 6803.
Opomba: Nomenklatura 2009: 05 07 01 06, 05 02 16 02, 6701, 6702, 6803.
2008 — Expenditure/Assigned Revenue for the Paying Agencies for which the accounts are
2008 – Izdatki/Namenski prejemki za plačilne agencije, za katere so obračuni
Reductions and suspensions for the whole financial year [1]
Zmanjšanja in začasne ustavitve za celotno proračunsko leto [1]
Total including reductions and suspensions
Skupaj, vključno z zmanjšanji in začasnimi ustavitvami
Payments made to the Member State for the financial year
Plačila, izplačana državi članici v proračunskem letu
Amount to be recovered from (-) or paid to (+) the Member State [2]
Znesek, ki ga je treba izterjati (–) od države članice ali plačati (+) državi članici [2]
= total of the expenditure/assigned revenue in the monthly declarations
= celotni izdatki/ namenski prejemki v mesečnih izjavah
Sugar Fund
Sklad za sladkor
Article 32 (=e)
Člen 32 (= e)
Total (=h)
Skupaj (= h)
The reductions and suspensions are those taken into account in the payment system, to which are added in particular the corrections for the non-respect of payment deadlines established in August, September and October 2008.
Gre za zmanjšanja in začasne ustavitve, ki so upoštevani v plačilnem sistemu in h katerim se prištejejo zlasti popravki za nespoštovanje plačilnih rokov za avgust, september in oktober 2008.
For the calculation of the amount to be recovered from or paid to the Member State the amount taken into account is, the total of the annual declaration for the expenditure cleared (col.a) or, the total of the monthly declarations for the expenditure disjoined (col.b).Applicable exchange rate: Article 7(2) of the Regulation (EC) No 883/2006.
Za izračun zneska, ki ga je treba izterjati od države članice ali plačati državi članici, se v primeru potrjenih izdatkov (stolpec (a)) upošteva skupna vsota v letnem poročilu, v primeru izključenih izdatkov (stolpec (b)) pa skupna vsota v mesečnih izjavah.Veljavni menjalni tečaj: člen 7(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 883/2006.
If the Assigned revenue part would be in advantage of Member State, it has to be declared under 05 07 01 06.
Če so namenski prejemki v korist državi članici, jih je treba prijaviti pod 05 07 01 06.
If the Assigned revenue part of the Sugar Fund, would be in the advantage of the Member State, it has to be declared under 05 02 16 02.
Če so namenski prejemki iz Sklada za sladkor v korist državi članici, jih je treba prijaviti pod 05 02 16 02.
FINANCIAL YEAR 2008 — EAGF
PRORAČUNSKO LETO 2008 – EKJS
List of the paying agencies for which the accounts are disjoined and are subject of a later clearance decision
Seznam plačilnih agencij, katerih obračuni se izključijo in bodo obravnavani v prihodnji odločbi o potrditvi
Annex III to the said Regulation provides the table that had to be provided in 2009 by the Member States.
V Prilogi III k navedeni uredbi je tabela, ki so jo države članice morale predložiti v letu 2009.
On the basis of the tables completed by the Member States, the Commission should decide on the financial consequences of non-recovery of irregularities older than four or eight years respectively.
Na podlagi tabel, ki jih izpolnijo države članice, mora Komisija odločiti o finančnih posledicah zaradi neizvršenih izterjav, ki so starejše od štirih oziroma osmih let.
of 4 May 2009
z dne 4. maja 2009
fixing for the marketing year 2009/2010 the amounts of the aid for diversification and the additional aid for diversification to be granted under the temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry of the Community
o določitvi zneskov pomoči za diverzifikacijo in dodatne pomoči za diverzifikacijo, ki se odobri v okviru začasne sheme za prestrukturiranje industrije sladkorja Skupnosti za tržno leto 2009/2010
(notified under document number C(2009) 3158)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 3158)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 of 20 February 2006 establishing a temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry in the Community and amending Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 320/2006 z dne 20. februarja 2006 o ustanovitvi začasne sheme za prestrukturiranje industrije sladkorja v Skupnosti in spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike,
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 968/2006 of 27 June 2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 establishing a temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry in the Community, and in particular Article 13(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 968/2006 z dne 27. junija 2006 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 320/2006 o ustanovitvi začasne sheme za prestrukturiranje industrije sladkorja v Skupnosti in zlasti člena 13(1) Uredbe,
The Commission has to fix the amounts attributed to each Member State concerned for the aid for diversification provided for in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 and the additional aid for diversification provided for in Article 7 of that Regulation.
Komisija mora za vsako zadevno državo članico določiti zneske pomoči za diverzifikacijo iz člena 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 320/2006 in dodatne pomoči za diverzifikacijo iz člena 7 navedene uredbe.
The amounts of the aid for diversification and additional aid for diversification are calculated on the basis of the tonnes of sugar quota renounced in the 2009/2010 marketing year in the Member State concerned, as provided for in Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 968/2006,
Zneski pomoči za diverzifikacijo in dodatne pomoči za diverzifikacijo se v skladu s členom 13(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 968/2006 izračunajo na podlagi ton kvote za sladkor, ki je bila v zadevni državi članici opuščena v tržnem letu 2009/2010 –
The amounts per Member State concerned of the aid for diversification and the additional aid for diversification provided for in Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 respectively, as fixed in respect of the quotas renounced in the 2009/2010 marketing year, are set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Zneski pomoči za diverzifikacijo in dodatne pomoči za diverzifikacijo na zadevno državo članico iz členov 6 in 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 320/2006, določeni na podlagi opuščenih kvot v tržnem letu 2009/2010, so navedeni v Prilogi k tej odločbi.
Done at Brussels, 4 May 2009.
V Bruslju, 4. maja 2009
Amounts per Member State of the aid for diversification and the additional aid for diversification 2009/2010 marketing year
Zneski pomoči za diverzifikacijo in dodatne pomoči za diverzifikacijo na posamezno državo članico v tržnem letu 2009/2010
Political and Security Committee Decision ATALANTA/3/2009
Sklep ATALANTA/3/2009 Političnega in varnostnega odbora
on the setting up of the Committee of Contributors for the European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of piracy and armed robbery off the Somali coast (Atalanta)
o vzpostavitvi odbora sodelujočih držav za vojaško operacijo Evropske unije kot prispevku k odvračanju, preprečevanju in zatiranju piratstva in oboroženih ropov pred somalsko obalo (Atalanta)
(2009/369/CFSP)
(2009/369/SZVP)
Having regard to Council Joint Action 2008/851/CFSP of 10 November 2008 on a European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of piracy and armed robbery off the Somali coast [1] (Atalanta), and in particular Article 10(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Skupnega ukrepa Sveta 2008/851/SZVP z dne 10. novembra 2008 o vojaški operaciji Evropske unije kot prispevku k odvračanju, preprečevanju in zatiranju piratstva in oboroženih ropov pred somalsko obalo (Atalanta) [1] in zlasti člena 10(5) Skupnega ukrepa,
Under Article 10(5) of Joint Action 2008/851/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to take relevant decisions on the setting up of a Committee of Contributors (CoC) for Operation Atalanta.
V skladu s členom 10(5) Skupnega ukrepa 2008/851/SZVP je Svet pooblastil Politični in varnostni odbor (PVO), da sprejme ustrezne sklepe o vzpostavitvi odbora sodelujočih držav (OSD) za operacijo Atalanta.
The European Council Conclusions of Nice of 7, 8 and 9 December 2000 and those of Brussels of 24 and 25 October 2002 laid down the arrangements for the participation of third States in crisis management operations and the setting up of a CoC.
V Sklepih Evropskega sveta iz Nice z dne 7, 8 in 9. decembra 2000 in Sklepih Evropskega sveta iz Bruslja z dne 24 in 25. oktobra 2002 so navedene podrobnosti glede sodelovanja tretjih držav v okviru operacij za krizno upravljanje ter vzpostavitve OSD.
The CoC will play a key role in the day-to-day management of Operation Atalanta.
OSD bo imel ključno vlogo pri tekočem vodenju operacije Atalanta.
It will be the main forum where contributing States collectively address questions relating to the employment of their forces in the Operation.
Odbor je glavni forum, na katerega se sodelujoče države skupno obračajo z vprašanji v zvezi z uporabo svojih sil v operaciji.
The PSC, which exercises the political control and strategic direction of the Operation, will take account of the views expressed by the CoC.
PVO, ki politično nadzoruje in strateško vodi operacijo, bo upošteval stališča, ki jih izrazi OSD.
A Committee of Contributors (CoC) for the European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of piracy and armed robbery off the Somali coast (Atalanta) is hereby established.
Ustanovi se odbor sodelujočih držav (OSD) za vojaško operacijo Evropske unije kot prispevku k odvračanju, preprečevanju in zatiranju piratstva in oboroženih ropov pred somalsko obalo (Atalanta).
Its terms of reference are laid down in the European Council Conclusions of Nice of December 2000 and those of Brussels of October 2002.
Njegove naloge in pristojnosti so določene v Sklepih Evropskega sveta iz Nice iz meseca decembra 2000 in Sklepih Evropskega sveta iz Bruslja iz meseca oktobra 2002.
representatives of third States participating in the Operation and providing significant military contributions, as referred to in the Annex,
predstavniki tretjih držav, ki sodelujejo v operaciji in zagotavljajo bistvene vojaške prispevke, kakor je navedeno v Prilogi.
The EU Operation Commander, the Director-General of the European Union Military Staff, or their representatives and representatives of the Commission shall attend the CoC meetings.
Na sestankih OSD so prisotni poveljnik operacije EU, generalni direktor Vojaškega štaba Evropske unije ali njihovi predstavniki in predstavniki Komisije.
Without prejudice to the prerogatives of the Presidency, the CoC shall be chaired by the Secretary-General/High Representative or his representative in close consultation with the Presidency and the Chairman of the European Union Military Committee (CEUMC) or his representative.
Brez poseganja v pristojnosti predsedstva OSD predseduje generalni sekretar/visoki predstavnik ali njegov zastopnik v tesnem sodelovanju s predsedstvom, ki mu pomaga predsednik Vojaškega odbora Evropske unije (PVOEU) ali njegov zastopnik.
Where circumstances require, emergency meetings may be convened on the Chair’s initiative, or at the request of a member.
Če tako zahtevajo okoliščine, se na pobudo predsednika ali na zahtevo člana odbora lahko skličejo nujni sestanki.
unanimity of the representatives of States contributing to the Operation shall be required for the CoC to take decisions on the day-to-day management of the Operation,
pri odločitvah, ki jih OSD sprejema v zvezi s tekočim vodenjem operacije, potrebno soglasje predstavnikov držav, ki sodelujejo v operaciji;
unanimity of the CoC members shall be required for the CoC to make recommendations on possible adjustments to operational planning, including possible adjustments to objectives.
pri oblikovanju priporočil v okviru OSD o možnih prilagoditvah operativnega načrtovanja, vključno z morebitno prilagoditvijo ciljev, potrebno soglasje članov OSD.
Denmark shall not take part in any decision of the CoC.
Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejemanju odločitev OSD.
establishing the European Police Office (Europol)
o ustanovitvi Evropskega policijskega urada (Europol)
(2009/371/JHA)
(2009/371/PNZ)
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 30(1)(b), Article 30(2) and Article 34(2)(c) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji ter zlasti člena 30(1)(b), člena 30(2) in člena 34(2)(c) Pogodbe,
The establishment of a European Police Office (Europol) was agreed in the Treaty on European Union of 7 February 1992, and regulated in the Convention based on Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention) [2].
Ustanovitev Evropskega policijskega urada (Europol) je bila dogovorjena v Pogodbi o Evropski uniji z dne 7. februarja 1992, ureja pa jo Konvencija na podlagi člena K.3 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji o ustanovitvi Evropskega policijskega urada (Konvencija o Europolu) [2].
The Europol Convention has been the subject of a number of amendments enshrined in three protocols which have entered into force after a lengthy process of ratification.
Konvencija o Europolu je bila večkrat spremenjena, in sicer s tremi protokoli, ki so začeli veljati po dolgotrajnem postopku ratifikacije.
Consequently, replacing the Convention by a Decision will ease further amendments as necessary.
Tako bo nadomestitev Konvencije s sklepom olajšala nadaljnje potrebne spremembe.
Simplification and improvement of Europol’s legal framework can be partially achieved by the establishment of Europol as an entity of the Union, funded from the general budget of the European Union, due to the subsequent application of the general rules and procedures.
Pravni okvir Europola se lahko deloma poenostavi in izboljša z ustanovitvijo Europola kot subjekta Unije, ki se financira iz splošnega proračuna Evropske unije v skladu z naknadno uporabo splošnih pravil in postopkov.
Recent legal instruments setting up similar Union entities in the areas covered by Title VI of the Treaty on European Union (Council Decision 2002/187/JHA of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime [3] and Decision 2005/681/JHA of 20 September 2005 establishing the European Police College (CEPOL) [4] have taken the form of Council Decisions, since such Decisions are more easily adaptable to changing circumstances and emerging political priorities.
Nedavni pravni instrumenti, s katerimi so bili na področjih iz naslova VI Pogodbe o Evropski uniji ustanovljeni podobni subjekti Unije (Sklep Sveta 2002/187/PNZ z dne 28. februarja 2002 o ustanovitvi Eurojusta za okrepitev boja proti težjim oblikam kriminala [3] in Sklep Sveta 2005/681/PNZ z dne 20. septembra 2005 o ustanovitvi Evropske policijske akademije (CEPOL) [4], imajo obliko sklepov Sveta, ker se lahko takšni sklepi lažje prilagajajo spremenjenim okoliščinam in novim političnim prednostnim nalogam.
Establishing Europol as an entity of the Union, funded from the general budget of the European Union, will enhance the role of the European Parliament in the control of Europol through the involvement of the European Parliament in the adoption of that budget, including the establishment plan, and the discharge procedure.
Ustanovitev Europola kot subjekta Unije, ki se financira iz splošnega proračuna Evropske unije, bo okrepila vlogo Evropskega parlamenta pri nadzoru nad Europolom, saj Evropski parlament sodeluje pri sprejemanju tega proračuna, vključno s kadrovskim načrtom, ter v postopku razrešnice.
Making Europol subject to the general rules and procedures applicable to similar Union entities will ensure administrative simplification, which will allow Europol to devote more of its resources to its core tasks.
Uporaba splošnih pravil in postopkov, ki veljajo za podobne subjekte Unije, bo za Europol zagotovila administrativno poenostavitev, kar mu bo omogočilo, da več sredstev nameni svojim bistvenim nalogam.
Further simplification and improvement of Europol’s functioning can be achieved through measures aimed at widening the possibilities for Europol’s assisting and supporting the competent law enforcement authorities of the Member States, without providing for executive powers for Europol staff.
Nadaljnja poenostavitev in izboljšanje delovanja Europola se lahko doseže z ukrepi za povečanje možnosti Europola za pomoč in podporo pristojnim organom pregona držav članic, ne da bi se pri tem osebju Europola podelilo izvršilna pooblastila.
One such improvement is to ensure that Europol can assist the competent authorities of the Member States in combating specific forms of serious crime, without the current limitation that there must be factual indications that an organised criminal structure is involved.
Ena od takih izboljšav je zagotoviti, da bo lahko Europol pristojnim organom držav članic pomagal pri boju proti posebnim hujšim oblikam kriminala, brez sedanje omejitve, po kateri morajo obstajati dejanski znaki o vpletenosti organiziranih kriminalnih združb.
The establishment of joint investigation teams should be encouraged and it is important that Europol staff should be able to participate in them.
Spodbujati bi bilo treba ustanavljanje skupnih preiskovalnih enot in pomembno je, da bi v njih lahko sodelovalo tudi osebje Europola.
To ensure that such participation is possible in every Member State, it should be guaranteed that Europol staff do not benefit from the application of immunities while they are participating in a support capacity in joint investigation teams.
Da bi bilo tako sodelovanje mogoče v vseh državah članicah, bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da osebje Europola med sodelovanjem v preiskovalnih enotah v podporni funkciji ne bo uživalo imunitete.
That will be possible after the adoption of a Regulation to that effect on the basis of Article 16 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities.
To bo mogoče po sprejetju uredbe v ta namen na podlagi člena 16 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti.
Europol national units should have direct access to all data in the Europol Information System to avoid unnecessary procedures.
Nacionalne enote Europola bi morale imeti neposreden dostop do vseh podatkov v Europolovem informacijskem sistemu, da bi se izognili nepotrebnim postopkom.
In order to achieve its objectives, Europol processes personal data by automated means or in structured manual files.
Za doseganje svojih ciljev Europol obdeluje osebne podatke avtomatsko ali v strukturiranih ročno vodenih zbirkah.
Accordingly, the necessary steps should be taken to guarantee a level of data protection which corresponds at least to that which results from the application of the principles of the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, signed in Strasbourg on 28 January 1981, together with subsequent amendments thereto, once such amendments are in force between the Member States.
V skladu s tem bi bilo treba sprejeti potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev takšne ravni varstva podatkov, ki je vsaj enakovredna ravni, ki izhaja iz uporabe načel Konvencije Sveta Evrope o varstvu posameznikov glede na avtomatsko obdelavo osebnih podatkov, podpisane v Strasbourgu, dne 28. januarja 1981, in njenih kasnejših sprememb, takoj po njihovi uveljavitvi med državami članicami.
A Council Framework Decision on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters will be applicable to the transfer of personal data by Member States to Europol.
Pri prenosu osebnih podatkov s strani držav članic Europolu se bo uporabljal okvirni sklep Sveta o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah.
The relevant set of data-protection provisions in this Decision will not be affected by that Framework Decision and this Decision should contain specific provisions on the protection of personal data regulating these matters in greater detail because of the particular nature, functions and competences of Europol.
Navedeni okvirni sklep ne bo vplival na ustrezni skupek določb o varstvu podatkov iz tega sklepa in ta sklep bi moral vsebovati posebne določbe o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki bi zaradi posebne narave, nalog in pristojnosti Europola morale podrobneje urejati ta vprašanja.
There is a need for a Data Protection Officer who should be responsible for ensuring, in an independent manner, the lawfulness of data processing and compliance with the provisions of this Decision concerning the processing of personal data, including the processing of personal data on Europol staff which are protected by Article 24 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [5].
Potreben je pooblaščenec za varstvo podatkov, ki bi moral na neodvisen način zagotavljati zakonitost obdelave podatkov in skladnost z določbami tega sklepa o obdelavi osebnih podatkov, vključno z obdelavo osebnih podatkov osebja Europola, ki so zaščiteni v skladu s členom 24 Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [5].