natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‘However, in no case shall the total amount of Community support under the measures referred to in Article 69(4) of that Regulation and State aid exceed the ceiling referred to in Article 69(4) and (5).’.
„Vendar pa v nobenem primeru skupni znesek podpore Skupnosti v okviru ukrepov iz člena 69(4) navedene uredbe in državne pomoči ne presega zgornje meje iz člena 69(4) in (5)“.
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 72/2009 of 19 January 2009 on modifications to the common agricultural policy by amending Regulations (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 320/2006, (EC) No 1405/2006, (EC) No 1234/2007, (EC) No 3/2008 and (EC) No 479/2008 and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 1883/78, (EEC) No 1254/89, (EEC) No 2247/89, (EEC) No 2055/93, (EC) No 1868/94, (EC) No 2596/97, (EC) No 1182/2005 and (EC) No 315/2007
Popravek Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 72/2009 z dne 19. januarja 2009 o spremembah skupne kmetijske politike s spremembo uredb (ES) št. 247/2006, (ES) št. 320/2006, (ES) št. 1405/2006, (ES) št. 1234/2007, (ES) št. 3/2008 in (ES) št. 479/2008 in razveljavitvi uredb (EGS) št. 1883/78, (EGS) št. 1254/89, (EGS) št. 2247/89, (EGS) št. 2055/93, (ES) št. 1868/94, (ES) št. 2596/97, (ES) št. 1182/2005 in (ES) št. 315/2007
On page 10, Article 4 (Amendments to Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007), the following point is to be inserted:
Stran 10, člen 4 (Spremembe Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007), vstavi se naslednja točka:
‘39a)
„39(a)
Point A.II of Annex XI shall be amended as follows:
Točka A.II. Priloge XI se spremeni:
“Apportionment of the maximum guaranteed quantity for each marketing year from 2009/2010 to 2011/2012 for short flax and hemp fibre among the Member States referred to in Article 94(1a)”;
‚Razdelitev maksimalnih zajamčenih količin za vsako tržno leto od 2009/2010 do 2011/2012 za kratka lanena vlakna in vlakna konoplje med državami članicami iz člena 94(1a)‘;
5000 tonnes to be apportioned in national guaranteed quantities for each marketing year from 2009/2010 to 2011/2012 among Denmark, Ireland, Greece, Italy and Luxembourg.
5000 ton se razdeli v nacionalnih zajamčenih količinah za vsako tržno leto od 2009/2010 do 2011/2012 med Dansko, Irsko, Grčijo, Italijo in Luksemburgom.
Such apportionment shall be determined on the basis of the areas which were the subject of one of the contracts or commitments as referred to in Article 91(1).” ’.
Taka razdelitev se določi na podlagi površin, ki so bile del ene od pogodb ali obveznosti iz člena 91(1).‘ “
“(b)
‚(b)
Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009
establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003
o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor za kmete v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete, spremembi uredb (ES) št. 1290/2005, (ES) št. 247/2006, (ES) št. 378/2007 in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 36 and 37 and Article 299(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti členov 36, 37 in 299(2) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the 1979 Act of Accession, and in particular paragraph 6 of Protocol No 4 on cotton attached thereto,
ob upoštevanju Akta o pristopu iz leta 1979 in zlasti odstavka 6 Protokola št. 4 o bombažu, priloženega Aktu
The reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) agreed in 2003 and 2004 included provisions to gauge their effectiveness.
Reforme skupne kmetijske politike (SKP), dogovorjene v letih 2003 in 2004, so vsebovale določbe za merjenje njihove učinkovitosti.
In this context the Commission presented a Communication to the European Parliament and the Council entitled ‘Preparing for the’ Health Check ‘of the CAP reform’ on 20 November 2007.
S zvezi s tem je Komisija 20. novembra 2007 Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu predstavila sporočilo z naslovom „Priprava na ‚pregled zdravstvenega stanja‘ reforme SKP“.
That Communication and the subsequent discussions of its main elements by the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, as well as numerous contributions arising from public consultation should be taken into account.
To sporočilo in nadaljnje razprave Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta, Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora in Odbora regij o njegovih glavnih prvinah, kakor tudi številna mnenja, ki izhajajo iz posvetovanj z javnostjo, bi bilo treba upoštevati.
Experience drawn from the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes [4] in particular shows that certain elements of the support mechanism need to be adjusted.
Izkušnje, pridobljene pri izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor [4], zlasti kažejo, da je treba nekatere prvine mehanizma podpor prilagoditi.
In particular, the decoupling of direct support should be extended and the functioning of the single payment scheme should be simplified.
Zlasti bi bilo treba razširiti proizvodno nevezanost neposredne podpore in poenostaviti delovanje sheme enotnega plačila.
Furthermore, Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 has been substantially amended on several occasions.
Uredba (ES) št. 1782/2003 je bila tudi večkrat znatno spremenjena.
In the light of these developments and in the interest of clarity, it should be repealed and replaced by this Regulation.
Ob upoštevanju tega razvoja in zaradi jasnosti bi jo bilo treba razveljaviti in nadomestiti s to uredbo.
Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 established the principle that farmers who do not comply with certain requirements in the areas of public, animal and plant health, environment and animal welfare are subject to reductions of or exclusion from direct support.
Uredba (ES) št. 1782/2003 je uvedla načelo, da za kmete, ki ne izpolnjujejo nekaterih zahtev na področjih javnega zdravja, zdravja živali in rastlin, okolja in dobrega počutja živali, veljajo znižanja ali izključitve iz neposredne podpore.
This ‘cross compliance’ system forms an integral part of Community support under direct payments and should therefore be maintained.
Ta sistem „navzkrižne skladnosti“ je sestavni del podpore Skupnosti v okviru neposrednih plačil in bi ga bilo treba zaradi tega ohraniti.
However, experience has shown that a number of the requirements within the scope of cross compliance are not sufficiently relevant to farming activity or farm land or concern national authorities rather than farmers.
Vendar pa so izkušnje pokazale, da številne zahteve, ki spadajo v področje uporabe navzkrižne skladnosti, niso dovolj pomembne za kmetijsko dejavnost ali kmetijsko zemljišče ali pa zadevajo bolj nacionalne organe kot kmete.
It is therefore appropriate to adjust the scope of cross compliance.
Zaradi tega je primerno, da se prilagodi področje uporabe navzkrižne skladnosti.
Furthermore, in order to avoid agricultural land being abandoned and to ensure that it is maintained in good agricultural and environmental condition, Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 established a Community framework within which Member States adopt standards taking account of the specific characteristics of the areas concerned, including soil and climatic conditions and existing farming systems, land use, crop rotation, farming practices and farm structures.
Nadalje, da bi se izognili opuščanju kmetijskih zemljišč in da bi zagotovili, da se ta obdelujejo v skladu z dobrimi kmetijskimi in okoljskimi pogoji, je Uredba (ES) št. 1782/2003 vzpostavila okvir Skupnosti, v katerem države članice sprejmejo standarde ob upoštevanju posebnih značilnostih zadevnih območij, vključno s pogoji tal in podnebja ter obstoječimi sistemi kmetovanja, rabo zemljišč, kolobarjenjem, načini kmetovanja, in strukturami kmetijskih gospodarstev.
This framework should be maintained.
To okvir bi bilo treba ohraniti.
Experience has shown nevertheless that the relevance and beneficial effects of certain standards are not sufficient to justify their implementation by all Member States.
Izkušnje pa so pokazale, da se izvajanje nekaterih standardov v vseh državah članicah ne more utemeljevati zgolj z njihovim pomenom in pozitivnimi učinki.
Such standards should therefore become optional for Member States.
Uporaba takšnih standardov za države članice zato ne bi smela biti obvezna.
However, to ensure that the framework is as consistent as possible, a standard should not be optional where before 2009 the Member State concerned already defined a minimum requirement on the basis of such a standard or where national rules which address such a standard are in place.
Vendar se za zagotovitev čim večje skladnosti okvira standard ne bi smel opredeliti za neobveznega, če je država članica pred letom 2009 na njegovi podlagi predpisala minimalno zahtevo ali če so dogovorjena nacionalna pravila, ki urejajo ta standard.
The abolition, in accordance with this Regulation, of compulsory set aside within the single payment scheme could in certain cases have adverse effects on the environment, in particular as regards certain landscape features.
Ukinitev obvezne prahe v okviru sheme enotnega plačila v skladu s to uredbo bi lahko v nekaterih primerih imela škodljive posledice za okolje, zlasti glede nekaterih krajinskih značilnosti.
It is therefore appropriate to reinforce the Community provisions aimed at protecting specified landscape features.
Zato je primerno okrepiti določbe Skupnosti, katerih cilj je varovanje navedenih krajinskih značilnosti.
In specific situations it should also be possible for a Member State to provide for the establishment and/or retention of habitats.
V posebnih okoliščinah bi poleg tega moralo biti državi članici omogočeno, da predvidi vzpostavljanje in/ali ohranjanje habitatov.
Protection and management of water in the context of agricultural activity has increasingly become a problem in certain areas.
Zaščita in gospodarjenje z vodnimi viri v zvezi s kmetijsko dejavnostjo je na nekaterih območjih vedno večji problem.
The Community framework for good agricultural and environmental condition should therefore also be reinforced with the aim of protecting water against pollution and run-off and of managing the use of water.
Okvir Skupnosti za dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje bi bilo treba okrepiti tudi z namenom varovanja voda pred onesnaževanjem in odpadnimi vodami ter upravljanja uporabe vode.
Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 recognised the positive environmental effect of permanent pasture.
Uredba (ES) št. 1782/2003 potrjuje ugoden učinek trajnih pašnikov na okolje.
The measures in that Regulation aimed at encouraging the maintenance of existing permanent pasture to ensure against mass conversion to arable land should be maintained.
Ohraniti bi morali ukrepe iz navedene uredbe, namenjene spodbuditvi ohranjanja obstoječih trajnih pašnikov, da bi preprečili množično spreminjanje njihove namembnosti v orna zemljišča.
In order to achieve a better balance between policy tools designed to promote sustainable agriculture and those designed to promote rural development, a system of compulsory progressive reduction of direct payments (‘modulation’) was introduced by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003.
Da bi dosegli boljšo uravnoteženost med tistimi instrumenti politike, katerih namen je spodbuditi trajnostno kmetijstvo, in tistimi, katerih namen je spodbuditi razvoj podeželja, je bil z Uredbo (ES) št. 1782/2003 uveden sistem postopnega obveznega zmanjševanja neposrednih plačil („modulacija“).
That system should be maintained and should include the exemption of direct payments of up to EUR 5000.
Ta sistem bi bilo treba ohraniti, vključevati pa bi moral izvzetje neposrednih plačil do 5000 EUR.
The savings made through modulation are used to finance measures under the rural development policy.
Prihranki, dobljeni z modulacijo, se uporabljajo za financiranje ukrepov v okviru politike razvoja podeželja.
Since Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 was adopted, the agricultural sector has been faced with a number of new and demanding challenges such as climate change and the increasing importance of bio-energy, as well as the need for better water management and more effective protection of biodiversity.
Od sprejetja Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 se je kmetijski sektor soočil s številnimi novimi in zahtevnimi izzivi, kot so podnebne spremembe in čedalje večji pomen bioenergije, pa tudi potreba po boljšem gospodarjenju z vodo in učinkovitejšem varstvu biotske raznovrstnosti.
The Community, as party to the Kyoto Protocol [5], has been called upon to adapt its policies in the light of climate change considerations.
Skupnost kot pogodbenica Kjotskega protokola [5] je bila pozvana, da svoje politike prilagodi glede na vprašanja, povezana s podnebnimi spremembami.
Furthermore, following serious problems relating to water scarcity and droughts, the Council, in its Conclusions ‘Water Scarcity and Drought’ of 30 October 2007, considered that water management issues in agriculture should be further addressed.
Poleg tega je zaradi resnih težav, povezanih s pomanjkanjem vode in sušami, Svet v sklepih o pomanjkanju vode in suši z dne 30. oktobra 2007 menil, da bi bilo treba dodatno pozornost posvetiti vprašanjem gospodarjenja z vodo v kmetijstvu.
Furthermore, the Council emphasised, in its Conclusions ‘Halting the Loss of Biodiversity’ of 18 December 2006, that protecting biodiversity remains a major challenge and while important progress has been made, the attainment of the Community's biodiversity target for 2010 will require additional efforts.
Poleg tega je Svet v sklepih o Zaustavitvi izgube biotske raznovrstnosti z dne 18. decembra 2006 poudaril, da varovanje biotske raznovrstnosti ostaja glavni izziv; čeprav je bil dosežen pomemben napredek, pa si bo za dosego cilja Skupnosti na področju biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010 treba še prizadevati.
Moreover, since innovation can, in particular, contribute to the development of new technologies, products and processes, it will underpin the efforts to tackle these new challenges.
Ker inovacije lahko v veliki meri prispevajo k razvoju novih tehnologij, proizvodov in procesov, bi zato morale podkrepiti prizadevanja za obravnavanje omenjenih novih izzivov.
The expiry of the milk quota regime in 2015 in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products [6] will require specific efforts on the part of dairy farmers to adapt to changing conditions, particularly in disadvantaged regions.
Režim mlečnih kvot bo leta 2015 v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 z dne 22. oktobra 2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode [6] prenehal veljati, zato si bodo morali proizvajalci mleka posebej prizadevati, da bi se prilagodili spremenljivim razmeram, zlasti v manj razvitih območjih.
It is therefore appropriate that this particular situation should also be defined as a new challenge which Member States should be able to address with a view to ensuring a ‘soft-landing’ of their dairy sectors.
Zato je primerno, da se tudi ta specifična situacija uvrsti med nove izzive, ki bi jih morale biti države članice sposobne obravnavati, da bi zagotovile „mehak pristanek“ svojih sektorjev mleka in mlečnih izdelkov.
The Community acknowledges the need to tackle these new challenges in the framework of its policies.
Skupnost priznava, da se je treba spopadasti s temi novimi izzivi v okviru njenih politik.
In the area of agriculture, rural development programmes adopted under Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) [7] are an appropriate tool for dealing with them.
Na področju kmetijstva so primerno orodje za spoprijemanje z njimi programi za razvoj podeželja, sprejeti na podlagi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1698/2005 z dne 20. septembra 2005 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) [7].
To enable Member States to revise their rural development programmes accordingly without being required to reduce their current rural development activities in other areas, additional funding needs to be made available.
Da bi državam članicam omogočili, da ustrezno revidirajo svoje programe razvoja podeželja brez zmanjšanja svoje sedanje dejavnosti razvoja podeželja na drugih področjih, bi bilo treba dati na voljo dodatna finančna sredstva.
However, the financial perspective for the period 2007 to 2013 does not provide for the financial means to reinforce the Community's rural development policy as necessary.
Vendar finančna perspektiva za obdobje 2007–2013 ne zagotavlja finančnih sredstev za krepitev politike Skupnosti na področju razvoja podeželja glede na potrebe.
Under these circumstances, a large part of the financial resources needed should be mobilised by providing for a gradual increase in the reduction of direct payments through modulation.
V teh okoliščinah bi bilo treba sprostiti velik del potrebnih finančnih sredstev z zagotavljanjem postopnega večjega zniževanja neposrednih plačil z modulacijo.
The distribution of direct income support among farmers is characterised by the allocation of a large quantity of payments to a rather small number of large beneficiaries.
Za razdelitev neposredne dohodkovne podpore med kmete je značilno dodeljevanje velike količine plačil razmeroma majhnemu številu velikih upravičencev.
It is clear that larger beneficiaries do not require the same level of unitary support for the objective of income support to be efficiently attained.
Jasno je, da veliki upravičenci ne potrebujejo enake ravni enotne podpore, da bi bil cilj dohodkovne podpore učinkovito dosežen.
Moreover, the potential to adapt makes it easier for larger beneficiaries to operate with lower levels of unitary support.
Vrh tega so se veliki upravičenci sposobni prilagajati trgu tudi ob nižjih ravneh enotne podpore.
It is therefore fair to expect farmers with large amounts of support to make a special contribution to the financing of rural development measures addressing new challenges.
Zato je pravično pričakovati, da kmetje z visokimi zneski podpore posebej prispevajo k financiranju ukrepov razvoja podeželja, namenjenih spopadanju z novimi izzivi.
Therefore, it is appropriate to establish a mechanism providing for an increased reduction in the larger payments, the proceeds of which are to be used to address the new challenges in the framework of rural development.
Zaradi tega je primerno uvesti mehanizem, ki določa večje znižanje večjih plačil, katerih iztržek je treba uporabiti za spopadanje z novimi izzivi v okviru razvoja podeželja.
The particular geographical situation of the outermost regions as well as their insularity, small size, mountainous terrain and climate impose additional burdens on their agricultural sectors.
Zaradi posebnega geografskega položaja najbolj oddaljenih regij, pa tudi njihove otoške lege, majhnosti, goratega terena ter klime so njihovi kmetijski sektorji dodatno obremenjeni.
In order to mitigate such burdens and constraints, a derogation from the obligation to apply the modulation reduction to farmers in the outermost regions should be provided for.
Da bi take obremenitve in omejitve omilili, bi moralo obstajati odstopanje od obveznosti uporabe znižanja plačil z modulacijo za kmete v najbolj oddaljenih regijah.
The increased rates of compulsory modulation need to be taken into account by those Member States that opted to apply a system of voluntary modulation.
Povečane stopnje obvezne modulacije bi morale upoštevati tiste države članice, ki so se odločile za uporabo sistema prostovoljne modulacije.
Council Regulation (EC) No 378/2007 of 27 March 2007 laying down rules for voluntary modulation of direct payments provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers [8] should be therefore amended accordingly.
Ustrezno bi bilo treba spremeniti Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 378/2007 z dne 27. marca 2007 o pravilih za prostovoljno modulacijo neposrednih plačil, predvidenih v Uredbi (ES) št. 1782/2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete [8].
The amounts resulting from the application of 5 percentage points corresponding to the modulation reductions determined in Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 should be allocated amongst Member States according to the same criteria established under that Regulation, that is in accordance with objective criteria, while establishing that a certain percentage of the amounts is to remain in the Member States where they were generated.
Zneske, ki jih dobimo z uporabo 5 odstotnih točk, ki ustrezajo znižanjem na podlagi modulacije, določenih v Uredbi (ES) št. 1782/2003, bi bilo treba razdeliti med države članice na podlagi enakih meril, določenih z navedeno uredbo, in sicer v skladu z objektivnimi merili, obenem pa določiti, da se določen odstotek teh zneskov zadrži v državah članicah, kjer so bili ustvarjeni.
In view of the structural adjustments resulting from the abolition of rye intervention, the specific measures for certain rye production regions to be financed with part of the amounts generated by modulation should be maintained.
Glede na strukturne prilagoditve, ki izhajajo iz odprave intervencije za rž, bi bile treba določiti posebne ukrepe za nekatere regije pridelovalke rži, ki se financirajo z delom zneskov, ustvarjenih z modulacijo.
Moreover, the amounts raised by applying any further modulation reduction should be made available to the Member States in which they were generated.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba dati zneske, zbrane z uporabo kakršnega koli dodatnega znižanja na podlagi modulacije, na voljo državam članicam, v katerih so bili ustvarjeni.
In order to facilitate the functioning of modulation, notably with regard to the procedures for granting direct payments to farmers, and the transfers to the rural development programmes, net ceilings should be determined for each Member State to limit the payments to be made to farmers following the application of modulation.
Da bi olajšali delovanje modulacije, predvsem glede postopkov za odobritev neposrednih plačil kmetom, in prenosov na programe razvoja podeželja, bi bilo treba določiti neto zgornje meje za vsako državo članico, da bi se omejili zneski, ki jih je treba kmetom izplačati po uporabi modulacije.
To take into account the specificities of CAP support in the outermost regions and the fact that direct payments are not subject to modulation, the net ceiling for the Member States concerned should not include the direct payments in these regions.
Da bi upoštevali posebnosti pomoči SKP v najbolj oddaljenih regijah in dejstvo, da se modulacija ne uporablja za neposredna plačila, neto zgornja meja za zadevne države članice ne bi smela vključevati neposrednih plačil v teh regijah.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy [9] should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1290/2005 z dne 21. junija 2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike [9] bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Farmers in the new Member States which acceded to the European Union on or after 1 May 2004 receive direct payments following a phasing-in mechanism provided for in the respective Acts of Accession.
Kmetje v novih državah članicah, ki so pristopile k Evropski uniji 1. maja 2004 ali pozneje, prejemajo neposredna plačila v okviru mehanizma za postopno uvajanje, določenega v aktih o pristopu za posamezno državo članico.