natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Given the Member States’ notifications to the Commission, the interest rates applicable for the 2009 EAGF accounting year should be fixed taking the various factors into account.
Glede na sporočila držav članic Komisiji je obrestne mere za obračunsko leto 2009 EKJS treba določiti ob upoštevanju teh različnih elementov.
For expenditure relating to the financial costs incurred by Member States in mobilising funds to buy in products chargeable to the 2009 accounting year of the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF), the interest rates provided for in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 884/2006 in accordance with Article 4(1)(a) of that Regulation shall be:
Za izdatke za finančne stroške, ki so jih države članice imele pri mobilizaciji sredstev za odkup intervencijskih proizvodov, nastale v obračunskem letu 2009 Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada (EKJS), se obrestne mere iz Priloge IV k Uredbi (ES) št. 884/2006 ob uporabi člena 4(1)(a) navedene uredbe določijo na:
4,1 % in the case of the specific interest rate applicable in France, Ireland and the Czech Republic;
4,1 % za posebno obrestno mero, ki se uporablja v Franciji, na Irskem in Češkem;
4,3 % in the case of the specific interest rate applicable in Slovakia;
4,3 % za posebno obrestno mero, ki se uporablja na Slovaškem;
4,4 % in the case of the specific interest rate applicable in the Netherlands and Sweden;
4,4 % za posebno obrestno mero, ki se uporablja na Nizozemskem in Švedskem;
4,5 % in the case of the specific interest rate applicable in Greece;
4,5 % za posebno obrestno mero, ki se uporablja v Grčiji;
5,0 % in the case of the uniform interest rate for the Community applicable to those Member States for which no specific interest rate has been fixed.
5,0 % za enotno obrestno mero za Skupnost, ki se uporablja v državah članicah, za katere posebna obrestna mera ni bila določena.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1000/2008
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1000/2008
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of sulphanilic acid originating in the People’s Republic of China and India following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Indije na podlagi pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov na podlagi člena 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Articles 9 and 11(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), ter zlasti členov 9 in 11(2) Uredbe,
Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga, ki ga je Komisija dala po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom,
In July 2002, by Regulation (EC) No 1339/2002 [2], the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty (the existing measures) of 21 % on imports of sulphanilic acid falling within CN codes ex29214210 (TARIC code 2921421060) originating in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and a residual duty rate of 18,3 % on imports originating in India.
Svet je julija 2002 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1339/2002 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev („obstoječi ukrepi“) v višini 21 % na uvoz sulfanilne kisline, ki se uvršča pod oznako KN ex29214210 (oznaka TARIC 2921421060) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) in s preostalo stopnjo dajatve v višini 18,3 % na uvoz iz Indije.
The measures imposed had been based on the results of an anti-dumping proceeding initiated pursuant to Article 5 of the basic Regulation (the original investigation).
Uvedeni ukrepi temeljijo ugotovitvah glede protidampinškega postopka v skladu s členom 5 osnovne uredbe („prvotna preiskava“).
At the same time, by Regulation (EC) No 1338/2002 [3], the Council imposed a definitive countervailing duty of 7,1 % on imports of the same product originating in India.
Svet je hkrati z Uredbo (ES) št. 1338/2002 [3] uvedel dokončno izravnalno dajatev v višini 7,1 % na uvoz enakega izdelka s poreklom iz Indije.
Within the framework of the abovementioned anti-dumping and countervailing proceedings, the Commission, by Decision 2002/611/EC [4] accepted a price undertaking offered by one Indian exporting producer, Kokan Synthetics and Chemicals Pvt.
Komisija je v okviru zgoraj omenjenih protidampinških in izravnalnih postopkov s Sklepom 2002/611/ES [4] sprejela cenovno zvezo, ki jo je ponudil indijski proizvajalec izvoznik Kokan Synthetics and Chemicals Pvt.
Ltd (Kokan).
Ltd („Kokan“).
In February 2004, following an anti-absorption reinvestigation pursuant to Article 12 of the basic Regulation, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 236/2004 [5], increased the rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to imports of sulphanilic acid originating in the PRC from 21 % to 33,7 %.
Svet je februarja 2004 po ponovni preiskavi za ugotavljanje absorpcije dejstev v skladu s členom 12 osnovne uredbe z Uredbo (ES) št. 236/2004 [5] zvišal stopnjo dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz sulfanilne kisline iz LRK iz 21 % na 33,7 %.
In December 2003, Kokan informed the Commission that it wished to withdraw its undertaking voluntarily.
Kokan je decembra 2003 obvestil Komisijo, da želi prostovoljno umakniti svojo zavezo.
In April 2005, following a request lodged by Kokan, the Commission initiated [7] a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation and Article 19 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 [8] on protection against subsidized imports from countries not members of the European Community (the basic anti-subsidy Regulation), limited in scope to the examination of the acceptability of a subsequent undertaking to be offered by Kokan.
Komisija je aprila 2005 po zahtevi, ki jo je vložilo podjetje Kokan, začela [7] delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne Uredbe in členom 19 Uredbe (ES) št. 2026/97 [8] o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske Skupnosti („osnovna protisubvencijska uredba“), po obsegu omejen na proučitev sprejemljivosti naknadne zaveze, ki jo je ponudilo podjetje Kokan.
By Decision 2006/37/EC [9], the Commission accepted the subsequent undertaking offered by Kokan in connection with the anti-dumping and countervailing proceedings concerning imports of sulphanilic acid originating in India.
Komisija je s Sklepom 2006/37/ES [9] sprejela naknadno zavezo, ki jo je ponudilo podjetje Kokan v zvezi s protidampinškimi in izravnalnimi postopki, ki so povezani z uvozom sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Indije.
At the same time, Regulation (EC) No 1338/2002 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of sulphanilic acid originating in India and Regulation (EC) No 1339/2002 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of sulphanilic acid originating, inter alia, in India, were amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 123/2006 [10], to take into account the acceptance of the said undertaking.
Hkrati sta bili Uredba (ES) št. 1338/2002 o dokončni izravnalni dajatvi na uvoz sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Indije in Uredba (ES) št. 1339/2002 o dokončni protidampinški dajatvi na uvoz sulfanilne kisline s poreklom med drugim iz Indije z namenom upoštevanja omenjene zaveze spremenjeni z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 123/2006 [10].
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry [11], the Commission, on 24 April 2007, received a request for an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku ukrepov [11]24. aprila 2007 prejela zahtevek za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
This request was lodged by two Community producers (the applicants) representing 100 % of the Community production of sulphanilic acid.
Ta zahtevek sta vložila dva proizvajalca Skupnosti („vlagatelja“), ki predstavljata 100 % proizvodnje sulfanilne kisline v Skupnosti.
The applicants alleged and provided sufficient prima facie evidence that there was a likelihood of continuation and/or recurrence of dumping and recurrence of injury to the Community industry with regard to imports of sulphanilic acid originating in the PRC and India (the countries concerned).
Vlagatelja sta trdila in predložila zadostne prima facie dokaze o tem, da obstaja verjetnost nadaljevanja in/ali ponovitve dampinga in ponovnega pojava škode za industrijo Skupnosti glede uvoza sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz LRK in Indije („zadevni državi“).
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced on 24 July 2007, by a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [12], the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po posvetu s Svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov, in zato 24. julija 2007 z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [12], napovedala pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
Parallel investigations
Vzporedne preiskave
By a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 24 July 2007 [13], the Commission also initiated an expiry review investigation pursuant to Article 18 of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation on the countervailing measures in force on imports of sulphanilic acid originating in India.
Komisija je z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije24. julija 2007 [13], začela s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 18 osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe o veljavnih izravnalnih ukrepih glede uvoza sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Indije.
This investigation is still on-going.
Ta preiskava v zvezi s pregledom še poteka.
By a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 29 September 2007 [14], the Commission initiated on its own initiative a partial interim review limited to the level of subsidisation, pursuant to Article 19 of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, since there was sufficient prima facie evidence available to the Commission that the circumstances with regard to subsidisation, on the basis of which measures had been established, had changed and that these changes were of a lasting nature.
Komisija je z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije29. septembra 2007 [14], v skladu s členom 19 protisubvencijske uredbe na lastno pobudo začela delni vmesni pregled, ki je bil omejen na raven subvencioniranja, saj je Komisija imela na voljo dovolj prima facie dokazov za to, da so se okoliščine glede subvencioniranja, na podlagi katerih so bili določeni ukrepi, spremenile in da so omenjene spremembe trajne.
The investigation of continuation or recurrence of dumping covered the period from 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2007 (the review investigation period or RIP).
Preiskava glede nadaljevanja ali ponovnega pojava dampinga je zajela obdobje od 1. aprila 2006 do 31. marca 2007 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 2003 to the end of the review investigation period (the period considered).
Proučevanje trendov, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovnega pojava škode, je zajemalo obdobje od leta 2003 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („zadevno obdobje“).
The Commission officially advised the exporting producers, importers and users known to be concerned, the representatives of the exporting countries and the applicants, of the initiation of the expiry review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa uradno obvestila proizvajalce izvoznike, uvoznike in uporabnike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter predstavnike držav izvoznic in vlagateljev, ki so zahtevali začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov.
Questionnaires were sent to all parties known to be concerned, namely to the two Community producers and to all known exporting producers, importers and users.
Vsem strankam, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, so bili poslani vprašalniki, tj. dvema proizvajalcema Skupnosti in vsem znanim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, uvoznikom in uporabnikom.
Replies to the questionnaires were received from the two Community producers and from one exporting producer in India, as well as from four users.
Odgovore na vprašalnike sta poslala dva proizvajalca Skupnosti in en proizvajalec izvoznik v Indiji, prav tako pa tudi štirje uporabniki.
None of the exporting producers in the PRC and none of the importers replied to the questionnaire nor made themselves known in the course of this investigation.
Nobeden izmed proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK in nobeden izmed uvoznikov ni poslal izpolnjenega vprašalnika in se ni oglasil med navedeno preiskavo.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for a determination of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and resulting injury and of the Community interest.
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za ugotovitev verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovnega pojava dampinga, posledične škode in interesa Skupnosti.
In this regard, the Commission carried out verification visits at the premises of the following companies:
Komisija je izvedla preveritvene obiske v poslovnih prostorih naslednjih družb:
Exporting producer in India:
proizvajalec izvoznik v Indiji:
Kokan Synthetics & Chemicals Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India;
Kokan Synthetics & Chemicals Pvt Ltd, Bombaj, Indija;
Community producers:
proizvajalca Skupnosti:
Ardenity, Givet, France, and
Ardenity, Givet, Francija,
CUF Químicos Industriais, Estarreja, Portugal;
CUF Químicos Industriais, Estarreja, Portugalska;
Users:
uporabnika:
Kemira Germany GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany, and
Kemira Germany GmbH, Leverkusen, Nemčija,
Robama SA, Palafolls, Spain.
Robama SA, Palafolls, Španija.
The product under review is the same as that of the original investigation, namely sulphanilic acid currently classifiable within CN code ex29214210.
Izdelek, ki se pregleduje, je enak kot v prvotni preiskavi, tj. sulfanilna kislina, ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznako KN ex29214210.
There are basically two grades of sulphanilic acid, which are determined according to their purity: a technical grade and a purified grade.
V osnovi obstajata dve stopnji sulfanilne kisline, ki se ločita glede na čistost: kislina tehnične kakovosti in kislina očiščene kakovosti.
In addition, the purified grade is sometimes commercialised in the form of a salt of sulphanilic acid.
Poleg tega je kislina očiščene kakovosti včasih na trgu prisotna v obliki soli sulfanilne kisline.
Sulphanilic acid is used as a raw material in the production of optical brighteners, concrete additives, food colourants and speciality dyes.
Sulfanilna kislina se uporablja kot surovina v proizvodnji optičnih belil, dodatkov za beton, barvil za hrano in posebnih barvil.
While there are different uses of sulphanilic acid, all grades and forms are perceived by users to be reasonably substitutable, are used interchangeably in most applications and are, therefore, treated, as was the case in the original investigation, as one single product.
Ker obstajajo različne rabe sulfanilne kisline, lahko uporabniki vse stopnje in oblike nadomestijo ter enakovredno uporabljajo in se jih lahko kot pri prvotni preiskavi šteje za en izdelek.
As established in the original investigation, this review confirmed that sulphanilic acid is a pure commodity product and its quality and basic physical characteristics are identical, whatever the country of origin.
Kot je pokazala prvotna preiskava, je ta preiskava v zvezi s pregledom potrdila, da je sulfanilna kislina čist izdelek, njena kakovost in osnovne fizikalne lastnosti pa so enake ne glede na državo porekla.
The product concerned and the products manufactured and sold by the exporting producer in India on its domestic market and to third countries, as well as those manufactured and sold by the Community producers on the Community market, have thus been found to have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and essentially the same uses, and are therefore considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zadevni izdelek in izdelki, ki jih proizvede in proda zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik v Indiji na domačem trgu ter izvozi v tretje države, prav tako pa tudi izdelki, ki jih proizvedejo in prodajo proizvajalci Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti, imajo enake osnovne fizikalne in kemične lastnosti ter v osnovi enako uporabo in se jih zato šteje za podobne izdelke v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether dumping was taking place during the RIP and whether or not the expiry of the measures would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping.
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe je bilo proučeno, ali je bil damping prisoten v OPP in ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo zaradi izteka veljavnosti ukrepov nadaljeval ali ponovil.
It should be noted that, as the Community expanded to 25 Member States in 2004 and to 27 Member States in 2007, export volumes and market shares of imports in the previous investigation and in the current expiry review cannot be directly compared.
Treba je upoštevati, da se je Skupnost leta 2004 razširila na 25 držav članic in leta 2007 na 27 držav članic in se zato obseg izvoza in tržni deleži uvoza v predhodni preiskavi in trenutnem pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov ne morejo neposredno primerjati.
In order to respect confidential business information and in view of the fact that Kokan represents 100 % of imports originating in India, it has been necessary to present the relevant information in ranges or in indexed form.
Z namenom upoštevanja zaupnih poslovnih informacij in glede na to, da Kokan predstavlja 100 % uvoza, ki izhaja iz Indije, je bilo pomembne informacije potrebno predstaviti v stopnjah ali v indeksirani obliki.
This examination was based on the verified questionnaire reply from the cooperating exporting producer in India that fully cooperated with the investigation.
Ta preiskava temelji na preverjenih odgovorih na vprašalnik sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika v Indiji, ki je sodeloval pri preiskavi.
It appears from the information provided by the company and available Eurostat data that all imports of the product concerned during the RIP were accounted for by this exporting producer.
Iz informacij, ki sta jih posredovala družba in Eurostat, je razvidno, da je celoten uvoz izdelka med OPP izvedel omenjeni proizvajalec izvoznik.
It was found that during the RIP around 800 to 1000 tonnes of sulphanilic acid were imported from India into the Community, i.e. approximately 8-10 % of Community consumption.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bilo v OPP v Skupnost uvoženo od 800 do 1000 ton sulfanilne kisline iz Indije, tj. približno 8–10 % potrošnje Skupnosti.
In the original investigation, imports from India amounted to 1712 tonnes.
Pri prvotni preiskavi je uvoz iz Indije znašal 1712 ton.
In the absence of cooperation from any of the Chinese exporting producers, the examination of whether or not dumping was currently taking place had to be based on the information available to the Commission from other sources.
Ker ni sodeloval nobeden od kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, je preiskava, s katero se je ugotavljal obstoj dampinga, temeljila na informacijah, ki jih je Komisija dobila iz drugih virov.
In this respect, and in accordance with the provisions of Article 18 of the basic Regulation, official Eurostat data was used in order to establish import quantities and prices.
Glede tega in v skladu z določbami iz člena 18 osnovne uredbe, so bile uporabljene uradne informacije Eurostata z namenom določanja količine uvoza in cen.
On the basis of available data, it was found that during the RIP, 1482 tonnes of sulphanilic acid were imported from the PRC into the Community, i.e. approximately 15 % of the Community consumption.
Glede na razpoložljive podatke je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bilo v OPP iz LRK v Skupnost uvoženih 1482 ton sulfanilne kisline, tj. približno 15 % potrošnje Skupnosti.
In the original investigation period, imports from the PRC amounted to 2950 tonnes.
Pri prvotni preiskavi je uvoz iz LRK znašal 2950 ton. B:
In accordance with Article 11(9) of the basic Regulation, the same methodology as in the previous investigation was used to establish the dumping margin.
V skladu s členom 11(9) osnovne uredbe je bila uporabljena ista metodologija pri določanju stopnje dampinga kot pri prejšnji preiskavi.
It is recalled that in the original investigation a dumping margin of 24,6 % was established.
Treba je upoštevati, da je bila v prvotni preiskavi določena stopnja dampinga 24,6 %.
For the determination of normal value, it was first established for the cooperating exporting producer whether its total domestic sales of the product concerned were representative in comparison with its export sales to the Community.
Za določanje normalne vrednosti se je za vsakega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika najprej ugotovilo, ali je bila njegova skupna domača prodaja zadevnega izdelka reprezentativna v primerjavi z njegovo skupno izvozno prodajo v Skupnost.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, domestic sales were considered representative when the total domestic sales volume was at least 5 % of its total export sales to the Community.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe se domača prodaja šteje za reprezentativno, če predstavlja celotni obseg domače prodaje vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega izvoza v Skupnost.
The investigation showed that the domestic sales were representative.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je bila prodaja na notranjem trgu reprezentativna.
Subsequently, those types of the product concerned sold domestically by the exporting producer having overall representative domestic sales, and which were identical or directly comparable to the types sold for export to the Community, were identified.
Nato so bile opredeljene tiste vrste zadevnega izdelka, ki so jih na domačem trgu prodali proizvajalci izvozniki, ki imajo v celoti reprezentativno domačo prodajo, in so enake ali neposredno primerljive z vrstami, prodanimi za izvoz v Skupnost.
The criteria used for the identification of the different product types were the grade (pure or technical), the form (acid powder or sodium salt) and the acid concentration.
Merila, ki so bila uporabljena pri identifikaciji različnih vrst izdelkov, so bila stopnja (očiščena ali tehnična), oblika (kislina v prahu ali natrijeva sol) in koncentracija kisline.
For each product type sold by the exporting producer on its domestic market which was found to be directly comparable with the type sold for export to the Community, it was established whether domestic sales were sufficiently representative for the purposes of Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Za vsako vrsto izdelka, ki ga proizvajalec izvoznik prodaja na notranjem trgu in je primerljiv z vrsto izdelka, ki se prodaja za izvoz v Skupnost, je bilo ugotovljeno, ali je obseg prodaje na notranjem trgu dovolj reprezentativen za namene člena 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
Domestic sales of a particular product type were considered sufficiently representative when the total domestic sales volume of that type during the RIP represented 5 % or more of the total sales volume of the comparable product type exported to the Community.
Domača prodaja posamezne vrste izdelka se je štela za dovolj reprezentativno, ko je obseg skupne domače prodaje te vrste med OPP predstavljal 5 % ali več skupnega obsega prodaje primerljive vrste izdelka, izvoženega v Skupnost.
The investigation showed that out of the three types exported by the exporting producer concerned, two were sold in representative quantities on the domestic market.
Preiskava je pokazala, da sta se od treh vrst, ki jih je izvažal zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik, dve prodajali v reprezentativnih količinah na domačem trgu.