natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
although the use of vaccines against Newcastle disease which do not fulfil the specific requirements of Annex VI (II) to Regulation (EC) No 798/2008 is not prohibited in:
[da čeprav uporaba cepiv proti atipični kokošji kugi, ki ne izpolnjujejo posebnih zahtev iz Priloge VI(II) k Uredbi (ES) št. 798/2008, ni prepovedana:
the day-old chicks described in this certificate are transported in disposable boxes used for the first time and:
da se enodnevni piščanci, opisani v tem spričevalu, prevažajo v škatlah za enkratno uporabo, ki so uporabljene prvič in:
The containers and vehicles in which the boxes mentioned above have been transported have been cleansed and disinfected before loading in accordance with the instructions of the competent authority.
da so bili zabojniki in vozila, v katerih so se prevažale navedene škatle, pred natovarjanjem očiščeni in razkuženi v skladu z navodili pristojnega organa.
Box I.8: provide the code for the zone or the compartment of origin, if necessary, as defined under code in column 2 of Part 1 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 798/2008.
Rubrika I.8: po potrebi navedite oznako za območje ali kompartment izvora, kot je določeno z oznako v stolpcu 2 dela 1 Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 798/2008.
“Day-old chicks” as defined in Regulation (EC) No 798/2008.
‚Enodnevni piščanci‘, kot so opredeljeni v Uredbi (ES) št. 798/2008.
Code of the territory as it appears in column 2 of Part 1 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 798/2008.
Oznaka ozemlja, kot je navedena v stolpcu 2 dela 1 Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 798/2008.
flocks of breeding poultry: Salmonella Hadar, Salmonella Virchow and Salmonella Infantis;
jate matične perutnine: Salmonella Hadar, Salmonella Virchow in Salmonella Infantis;
This option only applies for Canada.
Ta možnost se uporablja le za Kanado.
Name (in capital letters):
Ime (z velikimi tiskanimi črkami)::
The model veterinary certificate for hatching eggs of poultry other than of ratites (HEP) is replaced by the following:
vzorec veterinarskega spričevala za valilna jajca perutnine razen valilnih jajc ratitov (HEP) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
IIdentification number
Identifikacijska številka
Where the flocks from which the hatching eggs come were imported into the country, territory, zone or compartment of origin, this took place in accordance with veterinary conditions at least as strict as the relevant requirements of Directive 90/539/EEC and any subsidiary Decisions;
Če so bile jate, iz katerih izvirajo valilna jajca, uvožene v državo, na ozemlje, območje ali v kompartment izvora, so bile uvožene v skladu z veterinarskimi pogoji, ki so najmanj enako strogi kot ustrezne zahteve iz Direktive 90/539/EGS, vključno z vsemi morebitnimi dopolnilnimi odločbami;
(2)(3)(10) or [the territory of code …, excluding any area under official restrictions for low pathogenic avian influenza as defined in Regulation (EC) No 798/2008;]
(2)(3)(10) ali [z ozemlja z oznako …, ki so bili v času izdaje tega spričevala prosti visoko in nizko patogene aviarne influence v skladu z opredelitvijo iz Uredbe (ES) št. 798/2008;]
have been examined at the date of issue of this certificate and showed no clinical signs of or grounds for suspecting any disease;
so bile najmanj šest tednov pred uvozom v Skupnost v obratih, določenih v rubriki I.11 dela I,
have been kept for at least six weeks immediately prior to import to the Community in the establishment(s) defined in Box I.11 of Part I, officially approved in accordance with requirements that are at least equivalent to those laid down in Annex II to Directive 90/539/EEC:
ki so bili uradno odobreni v skladu z zahtevami, enakovrednimi vsaj zahtevam iz Priloge II k Direktivi 90/539/EGS: za katere dovoljenje ni bilo preklicano ali razveljavljeno;
and/or [(f) have been vaccinated using officially approved vaccines
in/ali [(f) so bile cepljene z uradno odobrenimi cepivi
have been disinfected in accordance with my instructions, using … (name of the product and active substance) for … (time in minutes);
da so bila razkužena v skladu z mojimi navodili z … (ime proizvoda in aktivne snovi) za… (čas v minutah);
if the Member State of destination is Finland or Sweden, the hatching eggs come from flocks which have tested negative in accordance with the rules laid down in Commission Decision 2003/644/EC.]
če je namembna država članica Finska ali Švedska, valilna jajca izvirajo iz jat, na katerih so bili opravljeni preskusi v skladu s pravili iz Odločbe Komisije 2003/644/ES, katerih rezultati so negativni.]
the hatching eggs are transported in perfectly clean disposable boxes used for the first time and which:
da se valilna jajca prevažajo v popolnoma čistih škatlah za enkratno uporabo, ki so uporabljene prvič in:
the word “hatching”,
beseda ‚valilna‘,
the containers and vehicles in which the boxes mentioned above have been transported have been cleansed and disinfected before loading in accordance with the instructions of the competent authority
da so bili zabojniki in vozila, v katerih so se prevažale navedene škatle, pred natovarjanjem očiščeni in razkuženi v skladu z navodili pristojnega organa.
Box I.28 (Category): select one of the following: Pure line/grandparents/parents/laying pullets/eggs of turkeys for consumption/others; (Identification system & Identification number): introduce the egg mark.
Rubrika I.28 (kategorija): izberite eno od naslednjih: čistopasemska/stari starši/starši/mlade kokoši nesnice/jajca puranov za prehrano/drugo; (identifikacijski sistem in identifikacijska številka): vpišite oznako jajc.
At the time of consignment the eggs must be individually marked in accordance with Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1868/77, including the approval number of the breeding establishment, in indelible black ink; such markings must be in legible writing and in at least one Community language.
V času odpreme mora biti vsako posamezno jajce označeno v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (EGS) št. 1868/77, vključno s številko odobritve reprodukcijskega centra, z neizbrisnim črnim črnilom; takšne oznake morajo biti v čitljivi pisavi in v najmanj enem uradnem jeziku Skupnosti.
The model veterinary certificate for egg products (EP) is replaced by the following:
vzorec veterinarskega spričevala za jajčne izdelke (EP) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Model veterinary certificate for egg products (EP)
„Vzorec veterinarskega spričevala za jajčne izdelke (EP)
I, the undersigned official veterinarian, hereby certify that the egg products described in this certificate were produced from eggs coming from an establishment which at the date of issue of the certificate is free from highly pathogenic avian influenza as defined in Regulation (EC) No 798/2008 and
Spodaj podpisani uradni veterinar potrjujem, da so bili jajčni izdelki iz tega spričevala proizvedeni iz jajc, ki izvirajo iz obrata, ki je bil v času izdaje tega spričevala prost visoko patogene aviarne influence v skladu z opredelitvijo iz Uredbe (ES) št. 798/2008 in
[within a 10km radius of which, including, where appropriate, the territory of a neighbouring country, there has been no outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza or Newcastle disease for at least the previous 30 days.]
[okoli katerega na območju s polmerom 10 km, vključno s sosednjo državo, kadar je to ustrezno, ni bilo nobenega izbruha visoko patogene aviarne influence ali atipične kokošje kuge najmanj zadnjih 30 dni.]
[the egg products were processed:
so bili jajčni izdelki obdelani:
either [liquid egg white was treated:
ali [tekoči jajčni beljak je bil obdelan:
either [with 55,6 °C for 870 seconds.]
ali [pri 55,6 °C 870 sekund.]
or [with 56,7 °C for 232 seconds.]
ali [pri 56,7 °C 232 sekund.]
or [10 % salted yolk was treated with 62,2 °C for 138 seconds.]
ali [10-odstotni slani rumenjak je bil obdelan pri 62,2 °C 138 sekund.]
or [dried egg white was treated:
ali [sušeni jajčni beljak je bil obdelan:
either [with 67 °C for 20 hours.]
ali [pri 67 °C 20 ur.]
or [with 54.4 °C for 513 hours.]
ali [pri 54,4 °C 513 ur.]
I, the undersigned, official veterinarian/official inspector declare that I am aware of the relevant provisions of Regulations (EC) Nos 178/2002, 852/2004 and 853/2004 and hereby certify that the egg products described in this certificate have been obtained in accordance with those requirements, and in particular that:
Spodaj podpisani uradni veterinar/uradni inšpektor izjavljam, da sem seznanjen z ustreznimi določbami uredb (ES) št. 178/2002, 852/2004 in 853/2004, ter potrjujem, da so jajčni izdelki iz tega spričevala pridobljeni v skladu z navedenimi zahtevami ter zlasti da:
the guarantees covering live animals and products thereof provided by the residue plans submitted in accordance with Directive 96/23/EC, and in particular Article 29 thereof, are fulfilled.
so izpolnjena jamstva, ki veljajo za žive živali in živalske proizvode ter so določena v načrtih o ostankih, predloženih v skladu z Direktivo 96/23/ES in zlasti s členom 29 navedene direktive.
Box I.8: provide the code for the zone or the compartment of origin, if necessary, as defined under code of column 2 of Part 1 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 798/2008.
Rubrika I.8: po potrebi navedite oznako za območje ali kompartment izvora, kakor je določeno z oznako v stolpcu 2 dela 1 Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 798/2008.
Box I.28: Nature of commodity: specify the egg content percentage.
Rubrika I.28: Vrsta blaga: navedite odstotek jajčnega deleža.
In Part I of Annex III, point 4 is replaced by the following:
točka 4 v delu I Priloge III se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Chapter III of Annex II to Directive 90/539/EEC; or
poglavje III Priloge II k Direktivi 90/539/EGS ali
Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals of the World Organisation for animal Health (OIE).’
Priročnik diagnostičnih preskusov in cepiv za kopenske živali, ki ga je izdala Svetovna organizacija za zdravje živali (OIE).“
Annex XI is replaced by the following:
Priloga XI se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(as referred to in Article 18(2))
(kakor je navedeno v členu 18(2))
Transit/storage of specified pathogen-free eggs, meat, minced meat and mechanically separated meat of poultry, ratites and wild game-birds, eggs and egg products
Tranzit/skladiščenje jajc, prostih specificiranih patogenih organizmov, mesa, mletega mesa in mehansko izkoščenega mesa perutnine, ratitov in divjih ptic, jajc in jajčnih izdelkov
complies (comply) with the relevant animal health conditions laid down in the animal health attestation in the model certificates in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 798/2008.
da izpolnjujejo ustrezne pogoje v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali iz potrdila o zdravstvenem stanju živali v vzorcih spričeval iz Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 798/2008.
Specified pathogen-free eggs, meat, minced meat and mechanically separated meat of poultry, ratites and wild game-birds, eggs and egg products as laid down in Part 1 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 798/2008.
Jajca, prosta specificiranih patogenih organizmov, meso, mleto meso in mehansko izkoščeno meso perutnine, ratitov in divjih ptic ter jajca in jajčni izdelki, kot so določeni v delu 1 Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 798/2008..
the approval of which has not been suspended or withdrawn; which is (are) not subject to any animal health restriction;
za katere ne veljajo nobene omejitve v zvezi z zdravstvenim stanjem živali;
Council Regulation (EC) No 412/2009
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 412/2009
amending Regulation (EC) No 428/2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyester staple fibres originating in the People’s Republic of China and Saudi Arabia, amending Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyester staple fibres originating in the Republic of Korea and terminating the anti-dumping proceeding in respect of such imports originating in Taiwan
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 428/2005 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve pri uvozu rezanih vlaken iz poliestra s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Saudove Arabije, o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2852/2000 o uvedbi dokončnih protidampinških dajatev pri uvozu rezanih vlaken iz poliestra s poreklom iz Republike Koreje in o zaključku protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom teh izdelkov s poreklom iz Tajvana
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 233 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 233 Pogodbe,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti pred dampinškim uvozom iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 9(4) Uredbe,
In October 1999, the Commission initiated an investigation [2] with regards to imports of polyester staple fibres (‘PSF’) originating in the Republic of Korea (‘original investigation’).
Komisija je oktobra 1999 začela preiskavo [2] v zvezi z uvozom rezanih vlaken iz poliestra s poreklom iz Republike Koreje („prvotna preiskava“).
In July 2000 provisional anti-dumping duties were imposed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1472/2000 [3] and in December 2000 definitive anti-dumping duties were imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000 [4].
Z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1472/2000 [3] so bile julija 2000 uvedene začasne protidampinške dajatve, z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2852/2000 [4] pa so bile decembra 2000 uvedene dokončne protidampinške dajatve.
Pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the Commission initiated [5]. an interim review (‘review investigation’) of the anti-dumping duties on imports of PSF originating, inter alia, in the Republic of Korea in December 2003.
Komisija je decembra 2003 v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe začela vmesni pregled [5] („preiskava v zvezi s pregledom“) protidampinških dajatev na uvoz rezanih vlaken iz poliestra s poreklom med drugim iz Republike Koreje.
The duties on imports from the Republic of Korea were amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2005 [6], hereinafter ‘Regulation 428/2005’.
Dajatve na uvoz iz Republike Koreje so bile spremenjene z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 428/2005 [6] (v nadaljevanju „Uredba 428/2005“).
On 10 June 2005, Huvis Corporation (‘Huvis’) lodged a request [7] before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (‘CFI’) to annul Article 2 of Regulation 428/2005 as far as the anti-dumping duty rate with regard to Huvis was concerned.
Huvis Corporation („Huvis“) je 10. junija 2005 na Sodišče prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti vložil zahtevek [7] za razveljavitev člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 428/2005 v zvezi s protidampniško stopnjo dajatve za Huvis.
On 8 July 2008, the CFI [8] annulled Article 2 of Regulation 428/2005 with regard to Huvis.
Sodišče prve stopnje ES [8] je 8. julija 2008 razveljavilo člen 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 428/2005 v zvezi s Huvisom.
The CFI found, inter alia, that the Institutions did not sufficiently justify the use of different methodologies applied in the original investigation on the one hand and the review investigation on the other hand when calculating Huvis’ individual duty rate.
Sodišče prve stopnje je med drugim ugotovilo, da institucije pri izračunu individualne stopnje dajatve za Huvis niso zadostno upravičile uporabe različnih metodologij iz prvotne preiskave in preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
The findings of the Institutions in this regard were therefore considered inconsistent with Article 11(9) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se je štelo, da ugotovitve institucij v zvezi s tem niso v skladu s členom 11(9) osnovne uredbe.
Article 2 of Regulation 428/2005 was consequently annulled to the extent to which the anti-dumping duty imposed on exports into the European Community of goods produced and exported by Huvis exceeded that which would be applicable if the method applied in the original investigation had been used.
Člen 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 428/2005 je bil razveljavljen, ker je bila protidampinška dajatev, uvedena na izvoz v Evropsko skupnost, za blago, ki ga je proizvajal in izvažal Huvis, večja od dajatve, ki bi se uporabljala po metodi iz prvotne preiskave.
It is recognised by the Courts [9] that, in cases where a proceeding consists of several steps, the annulment of one of these steps does not annul the complete proceeding.
Sodišča [9] priznavajo, da v postopkih, ki so sestavljeni iz več delov, razveljavitev enega dela ne razveljavi celotnega postopka.
The anti-dumping proceeding is an example of such a multi-step proceeding.
Protidampinški postopek je primer takega postopka v več delih.
Consequently, the annulment of parts of the definitive anti-dumping Regulation does not imply the annulment of the entire procedure prior to the adoption of the Regulation in question.
Torej delna razveljavitev dokončne protidampinške uredbe ne pomeni razveljavitve celotnega postopka, ki je potekal pred sprejetjem zadevne uredbe.
On the other hand, according to Article 233 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, the Community institutions are obliged to comply with the Judgment of the Courts of the European Communities.
Po drugi strani pa morajo institucije Skupnosti v skladu s členom 233 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti upoštevati Sodbo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti.
Accordingly, the Community Institutions, in so complying with the Judgment, have the possibility to remedy the aspects of the contested Regulation which led to its annulment, while leaving unchanged the uncontested parts which are not affected by the Judgment [10].
V zvezi s tem imajo institucije Skupnosti pri upoštevanju Sodbe možnost odpraviti tiste vidike izpodbijane uredbe, ki so privedli do razveljavitve, neizpodbijane dele, ki jih Sodba [10] ne zadeva, pa pustijo nespremenjene.
This Regulation seeks to correct the aspects of the Regulation 428/2005 found to be inconsistent with the basic Regulation, and which thus led to the annulment of parts of that Regulation.
Ta uredba popravlja vidike Uredbe (ES) št. 428/2005, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da niso skladni z osnovno uredbo, kar je privedlo do razveljavitve delov navedene uredbe.
It also draws, regarding exporters in the Republic of Korea that were willing to cooperate in the investigation that led to Regulation 428/2005, the consequences from Article 9(6) of the Basic Regulation.
Ta uredba v zvezi z izvozniki iz Republike Koreje, pripravljenimi sodelovati v preiskavi, ki je privedla do sprejetja Uredbe (ES) št. 428/2005, navaja posledice na podlagi člena 9(6) osnovne uredbe.
All other findings made in Regulation 428/2005, which were not contested within the time limits for a challenge and thus were not considered by the CFI and did not lead to the annulment of the contested Regulation, remain valid.
Vse druge ugotovitve iz Uredbe (ES) št. 428/2005, ki se niso izpodbijale v določenih rokih in jih Sodišče prve stopnje zato ni upoštevalo ter niso privedle do razveljavitve izpodbijane uredbe, ostanejo veljavne.
Therefore, in accordance with Article 233 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, the anti-dumping duty rate for Huvis was re-calculated on the basis of the judgment of the CFI.
Zato je bila v skladu s členom 233 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti protidampinška stopnja dajatve za Huvis ponovno izračunana na podlagi sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje.
NEW ASSESSMENT OF THE FINDINGS BASED ON THE JUDGMENT OF THE CFI
NOVA OCENA UGOTOVITEV, NAREJENA NA PODLAGI SODBE SODIŠČA PRVE STOPNJE
In this Regulation, the aspect of the judgment that is addressed is the calculation of the dumping margin, more specifically the calculation of the adjustment made to the normal value for differences between the export price and the normal value in import charges in accordance with Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation.
V tej uredbi je vidik sodbe, ki se obravnava, izračun stopnje dampinga, natančneje izračun prilagoditve normalne vrednosti uvozne cene, upoštevajoč razlike med izvozno ceno in normalno vrednostjo v skladu s členom 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe.
As outlined in recitals (127) and (128) of the Regulation 428/2005, different methodologies were used to calculate the adjustment on the normal value in the original investigation on the one hand and in the above mentioned interim review on the other hand.
Kakor je bilo opisano v uvodnih izjavah 127 in 128 Uredbe (ES) št. 428/2005, so bile v prvotni preiskavi in zgoraj navedenem vmesnem pregledu uporabljene različne metodologije za izračun prilagoditve normalne vrednosti.
Without ruling on the legality as such of the method used in the interim review to calculate the abovementioned adjustment, the CFI in its Judgment found that the Community Institutions had not demonstrated the existence of a change in circumstances which could justify a use of a different method from the one used in the original investigation, as required by Article 11(9) of the basic Regulation.
Ne glede na to, da Sodišče prve stopnje ni dalo mnenja o zakonitosti metode iz vmesnega pregleda za izračun zgoraj navedene prilagoditve, je ugotovilo, da institucije Skupnosti niso dokazale, da so se okoliščine spremenile, kar bi upravičilo uporabo drugačne metode od tiste iz prvotne preiskave, kakor je določeno v členu 11(9) osnovne uredbe.
It therefore annulled Article 2 of Council Regulation 428/2005 to the extent to which the anti-dumping duty imposed on exports into the Community of goods produced and exported by Huvis exceeded that which would be applicable if the method, used in the initial investigation, had been used to calculate the adjustment to the normal value for import charges.
Člen 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 428/2005 je bil razveljavljen, ker je bila protidampinška dajatev, uvedena na izvoz v Evropsko skupnost, za blago, ki ga je proizvajal in izvažal Huvis, večja od dajatve, ki bi se uporabljala, če bi bila metoda iz prvotne preiskave uporabljena za izračun prilagoditve normalne vrednosti za uvozne dajatve.
Therefore, the adjustment to the normal value for import duties was re-calculated on the basis of the method used in the original investigation.
Zato je bila prilagoditev normalne vrednosti za uvozne dajatve ponovno izračunana na podlagi metode iz prvotne preiskave.
The comparison of the thus calculated weighted average normal value with the weighted average export price as found during the interim review by product type on an ex-factory basis showed the existence of dumping.
Primerjava tako izračunane tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno po vrsti izdelka na osnovi franko tovarna je pokazala prisotnost dampinga, kakor je bilo ugotovljeno v vmesnem pregledu.
The dumping margin established, expressed as a percentage of the CIF import price at the Community frontier, duty unpaid is 3,9 %.
Ugotovljena stopnja dampinga, izražena kot odstotek uvozne cene CIF na meji Skupnosti, brez plačane dajatve, je 3,9 %.
The individual rate calculated for Huvis had formed part of the basis for calculating the weighted average duty that should apply to non-sampled cooperating Korean exporters.
Individualna stopnja za Huvis Corporation je predstavljala del osnove za izračun tehtanega povprečja dajatve, ki bi se morala uporabljati za nevzorčene sodelujoče korejske izvoznike.
Therefore the dumping margin for cooperating companies not included in the sample was recalculated.
Zato je bila stopnja dampinga za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso bile vključene v vzorec, ponovno izračunana.
The new dumping margin for cooperating exporting producers not included in the sample established on the basis of a weighted average dumping margin is 4,4 %.
Nova stopnja dampinga za nevzorčene sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike, ki je bila določena na podlagi tehtane povprečne stopnje dampinga, je 4,4 %.
One company, Woongjin Chemical Co., Ltd (formerly Saehan Industries Inc.), contacted the Commission and argued that its duty, too, should be adapted.
Eno podjetje, in sicer Woongjin Chemical Co., Ltd. (nekdaj Saehan Industries Inc.), se je javilo Komisiji in trdilo, da bi bilo treba spremeniti tudi dajatev zanj.
However, since that company has not asked for annulment of its duty by the CFI its duty has become definitive.
Ker navedeno podjetje Sodišča prve stopnje ni zaprosilo za razveljavitev dajatve, je njegova dajatev postala dokončna.