natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
When regulating wholesale termination charges, NRAs should neither preclude nor inhibit operators from moving to alternative arrangements for the exchange of terminating traffic in the future to the extent that these arrangements are consistent with a competitive market.
Pri reguliranju veleprodajnih cen zaključevanja klicev NRO operaterjev ne bi smeli ovirati niti jim preprečevati, da v prihodnosti izberejo alternativne rešitve za izmenjavo zaključevanja prometa, pod pogojem da so te rešitve v skladu s konkurenčnim trgom.
A period of transition until 31 December 2012 should be considered long enough to allow NRAs to put the cost model in place and for operators to adapt their business plans accordingly while, on the other hand, recognising the pressing need to ensure that consumers derive maximum benefits in terms of efficient cost-based termination rates.
Prehodno obdobje, ki traja do 31. decembra 2012, bi moralo biti dovolj dolgo, da NRO uvedejo model izračunavanja stroškov in da operaterji v skladu z njim prilagodijo svoje poslovne načrte ter hkrati upoštevajo nujno potrebo uporabnikov, da čim bolj izkoristijo ugodnosti, ki jih imajo učinkovite cene zaključevanja klicev, ki temeljijo na stroških.
For NRAs with limited resources, an additional transitional period may exceptionally be needed in order to prepare the recommended cost model.
NRO z omejenimi sredstvi lahko izjemoma potrebujejo dodatno prehodno obdobje za pripravo priporočenega modela izračunavanja stroškov.
Any such outcome resulting from alternative methodologies should not exceed the average of the termination rates set by NRAs implementing the recommended cost methodology.
Rezultati, pridobljeni z nadomestnimi metodami, ne smejo presegati povprečnih cen zaključevanja klicev, ki jih NRO določajo z izvajanjem priporočene metode za izračunavanje stroškov.
This Recommendation has been subject to a public consultation,
O tem priporočilu je potekala javna razprava –
When imposing price control and cost-accounting obligations in accordance with Article 13 of Directive 2002/19/EC on the operators designated by National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) as having significant market power on the markets for wholesale voice call termination on individual public telephone networks (hereinafter referred to as ‘fixed and mobile termination markets’) as a result of a market analysis carried out in accordance with Article 16 of Directive 2002/21/EC, NRAs should set termination rates based on the costs incurred by an efficient operator.
Kadar nacionalni regulativni organi (NRO) v skladu s členom 13 Direktive 2002/19/ES operaterjem, ki jih NRO na podlagi tržne analize, izvedene v skladu s členom 16 Direktive 2002/21/ES, štejejo za operaterje s pomembno tržno močjo na trgih veleprodajnega zaključevanja govornih klicev v posameznih javnih telefonskih omrežjih (v nadaljnjem besedilu: trgi zaključevanja klicev v fiksnih in mobilnih omrežjih), naložijo obveznosti cenovnega nadzora in stroškovnega računovodstva, bi morali NRO določiti cene zaključevanja klicev, ki temeljijo na stroških učinkovitega operaterja.
This implies that they would also be symmetric.
To pomeni, da bi bile te cene tudi simetrične.
In doing so, NRAs should proceed in the way set out below.
Pri tem bi morali NRO upoštevati naslednji postopek.
It is recommended that the evaluation of efficient costs is based on current cost and the use of a bottom-up modelling approach using long-run incremental costs (LRIC) as the relevant cost methodology.
Priporoča se, da ocenjevanje dejanskih stroškov temelji na tekočih stroških in da se uporabi model „od spodaj navzgor“ z dolgoročnimi prirastnimi stroški (LRIC) kot ustrezna metoda za izračunavanje stroškov.
NRAs may compare the results of the bottom-up modelling approach with those of a top-down model which uses audited data with a view to verifying and improving the robustness of the results and may make adjustments accordingly.
NRO lahko primerjajo rezultate uporabe modela „od spodaj navzgor“ z rezultati uporabe modela „od zgoraj navzdol“, pri katerem se uporabljajo revidirani podatki, da se preveri in izboljša robustnost rezultatov ter da se opravijo ustrezne prilagoditve.
The cost model should be based on efficient technologies available in the time frame considered by the model.
Model izračunavanja stroškov bi moral temeljiti na učinkovitih tehnologijah, ki se lahko zagotovijo v obdobju, ki ga model obravnava.
Therefore the core part of both fixed and mobile networks could in principle be Next-Generation-Network (NGN)-based.
Osrednji del fiksnih in mobilnih omrežij bi torej lahko načeloma temeljil na omrežjih naslednje generacije.
The access part of mobile networks should also be based on a combination of 2G and 3G telephony.
Tudi dostop do mobilnih omrežij bi moral temeljiti na telefoniji druge in tretje generacije.
The different cost categories referred to herein should be defined as follows:
Različne navedene stroškovne kategorije bi morale biti opredeljene, kot sledi:
‘Incremental costs’ are those costs that can be avoided if a specific increment is no longer provided (also known as avoidable costs);
„prirastni stroški“ so stroški, ki se jim je mogoče izogniti, če se določen prirast ne zagotavlja več (navedeni tudi kot stroški, ki se jim je mogoče izogniti);
‘Traffic-related costs’ are all those fixed and variable costs which rise with increased levels of traffic.
„stroški, ki so odvisni od prometa“, so vsi stalni in spremenljivi stroški, ki se povečajo, ko se poveča promet.
Within the LRIC model, the relevant increment should be defined as the wholesale voice call termination service provided to third parties.
V modelu LRIC bi bilo treba ustrezni prirast opredeliti kot veleprodajno storitev zaključevanja govornih klicev za tretje stranke.
This implies that in evaluating the incremental costs NRAs should establish the difference between the total long-run cost of an operator providing its full range of services and the total long-run costs of this operator in the absence of the wholesale call termination service being provided to third parties.
To pomeni, da bi morali NRO pri ocenjevanju prirastnih stroškov ugotoviti razliko med celotnimi dolgoročnimi stroški, ki jih ima operater, ko zagotavlja vse svoje storitve, in celotnimi dolgoročnimi stroški tega operaterja, ko ne zagotavlja veleprodajnih storitev zaključevanja klicev tretjim strankam.
A distinction needs to be made between traffic-related costs and non-traffic-related costs, whereby the latter costs should be disregarded for the purpose of calculating wholesale termination rates.
Treba je razlikovati med stroški, ki so odvisni od prometa, in stroški, ki niso odvisni od prometa, pri čemer je treba pri izračunavanju cen veleprodajnega zaključevanja klicev zanemariti stroške, ki niso odvisni od prometa.
The recommended approach to identifying the relevant incremental cost would be to attribute traffic-related costs firstly to services other than wholesale voice call termination, with finally only the residual traffic-related costs being allocated to the wholesale voice call termination service.
Priporočeni pristop za opredelitev ustreznih prirastnih stroškov bi bil, da se stroške, odvisne od prometa, pripiše najprej storitvam, ki niso storitve zaključevanja klicev, pri čemer se samo preostali stroški, odvisni od prometa, dodelijo veleprodajni storitvi zaključevanja klicev.
This implies that only those costs which would be avoided if a wholesale voice call termination service were no longer provided to third parties should be allocated to the regulated voice call termination services.
To pomeni, da bi se reguliranim storitvam zaključevanja klicev dodelili samo stroški, ki se jim je mogoče izogniti, če se tretjim strankam storitev zaključevanja klicev ne zagotavlja več.
Principles for calculating the wholesale voice call termination service increment in fixed and mobile termination networks respectively are further elaborated in the Annex.
Načela izračunavanja prirastnih stroškov veleprodajne storitve zaključevanja govornih klicev v fiksnih in mobilnih omrežjih so za obe vrsti omrežij natančneje opredeljena v Prilogi.
The recommended approach for asset depreciation is economic depreciation wherever feasible.
Priporočeni pristop za amortizacijo sredstev je ekonomska amortizacija, kadar je ta izvedljiva.
When deciding on the appropriate efficient scale of the modelled operator, NRAs should take into account the principles for defining the appropriate efficient scale in fixed and mobile termination networks as set out in the Annex.
Pri odločanju o primernem učinkovitem obsegu operaterja, pri katerem je uporabljen model, bi morali NRO upoštevati načela za opredeljevanje primernega učinkovitega obsega v fiksnih in mobilnih omrežjih zaključevanja klicev, kot je določeno v Prilogi.
Any determination of efficient cost levels which deviates from the principles set out above should be justified by objective cost differences which are outside the control of the operators concerned.
Vsako opredelitev ravni dejanskih stroškov, ki odstopajo od zgoraj določenih načel, je treba utemeljiti z objektivnimi razlikami v stroških, na katere zadevni operaterji ne morejo vplivati.
Such objective cost differences may emerge in mobile termination markets due to uneven spectrum assignments.
Take objektivne razlike v stroških se lahko pojavijo na trgih zaključevanja mobilnih klicev zaradi neenakih dodelitev spektra.
To the extent that additional spectrum acquired to provide wholesale call termination is included in the cost model, NRAs should review any objective cost differences regularly, taking into account, inter alia, whether on a forward-looking basis additional spectrum is likely to be made available through market-based assignment processes which might erode any cost differences arising from existing assignments or whether this relative cost disadvantage decreases over time as the volumes of the later entrants increase.
Če je dodatni spekter, ki je bil pridobljen za zagotavljanje veleprodajnega zaključevanja klicev, vključen v model izračunavanja stroškov, morajo NRO redno preverjati morebitne objektivne razlike v stroških in pri tem med drugim upoštevati, ali je mogoče predvideti, da bo dodatni spekter postal na voljo v tržno zasnovanih postopkih dodeljevanja, kar bi lahko znižalo morebitne razlike v stroških, ki izhajajo iz obstoječih dodelitev, oziroma ali se ta relativna stroškovna pomanjkljivost sčasoma zmanjšuje s povečanjem tržnega deleža novih udeležencev na trgu.
In case it can be demonstrated that a new mobile entrant operating below the minimum efficient scale incurs higher per-unit incremental costs than the modelled operator, after having determined that there are impediments on the retail market to market entry and expansion, the NRAs may allow these higher costs to be recouped during a transitional period via regulated termination rates.
Če je mogoče dokazati, da ima novi udeleženec na trgu mobilne telefonije, ki posluje pod minimalnim učinkovitim obsegom, višje prirastne stroške na enoto kot operater, pri katerem je uporabljen model, lahko NRO – potem ko so ugotovili, da na maloprodajnem trgu pri vstopu na trg in njegovi širitvi obstajajo ovire – dovolijo, da se ti višji stroški kompenzirajo v prehodnem obdobju z reguliranimi cenami zaključevanja klicev.
Any such period should not exceed four years after market entry.
To obdobje ne sme presegati štirih let po vstopu na trg.
This Recommendation is without prejudice to previous regulatory decisions taken by NRAs in respect of the matters raised herein.
To priporočilo ne posega v prejšnje regulativne odločitve NRO v zvezi s tukaj obravnavanimi zadevami.
Notwithstanding this, NRAs should ensure that termination rates are implemented at a cost-efficient, symmetric level by 31 December 2012, subject to any objective cost differences identified in accordance with points 9 and 10.
Kljub temu morajo NRO zagotoviti, da so cene zaključevanja klicev do 31. decembra 2012 stroškovno učinkovite in simetrične, pri čemer so odvisne od morebitnih objektivnih razlik v stroških, ugotovljenih v skladu s točkama 9 in 10.
In exceptional circumstances where an NRA is not in a position, in particular due to limited resources, to finalise the recommended cost model in a timely manner and where it is able to demonstrate that a methodology other than a bottom-up LRIC model based on current costs results in outcomes consistent with this Recommendation and generates efficient outcomes consistent with those in a competitive market, it could consider setting interim prices based on an alternative approach until 1 July 2014.
V izjemnih okoliščinah, če NRO zlasti zaradi omejenih sredstev ne more pravočasno dokončati priporočenega modela izračunavanja stroškov in kadar lahko dokaže, da metoda, ki ni model LRIC „od spodaj navzgor“, je pa zasnovana na tekočih stroških, zagotavlja rezultate, ki so skladni s tem priporočilom in konkurenčnim trgom, lahko NRO do 1. julija 2014 določi začasne cene, ki temeljijo na alternativnem pristopu.
Where it would be objectively disproportionate for those NRAs with limited resources to apply the recommended cost methodology after this date, such NRAs may continue to apply an alternative methodology up to the date for review of this Recommendation, unless the body established for cooperation among NRAs and the Commission, including its related working groups, provides sufficient practical support and guidance to overcome this limitation of resources and, in particular, the cost of implementing the recommended methodology.
Kadar je za NRO z omejenimi viri objektivno nesorazmerno, da po tem datumu uporabljajo priporočeno metodo izračunavanja stroškov, lahko ti NRO do datuma pregleda te uredbe še naprej uporabljajo nadomestno metodo, razen če organ, ustanovljen za sodelovanje med NRO in Komisijo, vključno z njegovimi delovnimi skupinami, zagotavlja zadostno praktično podporo in jih usmerja pri premoščanju/reševanju problema omejenih virov in zlasti stroškov, nastalih pri izvajanju priporočene metode.
This Recommendation will be reviewed not later than four years after the date of application.
To priporočilo se pregleda najpozneje štiri leta po dnevu začetka uporabe.
Done at Brussels, 7 May 2009.
V Bruslju, 7. maja 2009
Principles for the calculation of wholesale termination rates in fixed networks
Načela izračunavanja veleprodajnih cen zaključevanja klicev v fiksnih omrežjih
The relevant incremental costs (i.e. avoidable costs) of the wholesale call termination service are the difference between the total long-run costs of an operator providing its full range of services and the total long-run costs of that operator not providing a wholesale call termination service to third parties.
Ustrezni prirastni stroški (tj. stroški, ki se jim je mogoče izogniti) veleprodajnega zaključevanja klicev so razlika med skupnimi dolgoročnimi stroški operaterja, ko izvaja vse svoje storitve, in skupnimi dolgoročnimi stroški istega operaterja, ko tretjim strankam ne zagotavlja veleprodajne storitve zaključevanja klicev.
A distinction needs to be made between traffic-related costs and non-traffic-related costs to ensure the appropriate attribution of those costs.
Treba je razlikovati med stroški, ki so odvisni od prometa, in stroški, ki niso odvisni od prometa, da bi zagotovili primerno pripisovanje teh stroškov.
The non-traffic-related costs should be disregarded for the purpose of calculating wholesale termination rates.
Stroške, ki niso odvisni od prometa, je treba zanemariti za namen izračuna veleprodajnih cen zaključevanja klicev.
From the traffic-related costs only those costs which would be avoided in the absence of a wholesale call termination service being provided should be allocated to the relevant termination increment.
Med stroški, ki so odvisni od prometa, je treba ustrezni prirasti zaključevanja klicev dodeliti samo tiste stroške, ki bi se jim lahko izognili, če ne bi zagotavljali veleprodajne storitve zaključevanja klicev.
These avoidable costs may be calculated by allocating traffic-related costs first to services other than wholesale call termination (e.g. call origination, data services, IPTV, etc.) with only the residual traffic-related costs being allocated to the wholesale voice call termination service.
Ti stroški, ki se jim je mogoče izogniti, se lahko izračunajo tako, da se stroški, odvisni od prometa, dodelijo najprej storitvam, ki niso veleprodajne storitve zaključevanja klicev (npr. vzpostavljanju povezave, podatkovnim storitvam, IPTV itd.), veleprodajni storitvi zaključevanja govornih klicev pa se dodelijo samo preostali stroški, odvisni od prometa.
The default demarcation point between traffic- and non-traffic-related costs is typically where the first point of traffic concentration occurs.
Privzeta razmejitvena točka med stroški, ki so odvisni od prometa, in stroški, ki niso odvisni od prometa, je običajno pri prvi koncentraciji prometa.
In a PSTN network this is normally deemed to be the upstream side of the line card in the (remote) concentrator.
V javnem telefonskem omrežju (PSTN) je to običajno stran priključne kartice v (oddaljenem) koncentratorju v povratnem vodu.
The broadband NGN equivalent is the line card in the DSLAM/MSAN [1].
Kartica DSLAM/MSAN [1] ustreza širokopasovnemu omrežju nove generacije.
Where the DSLAM/MSAN is located in a street cabinet, then it needs to be considered whether the former loop between the cabinet and the exchange/MDF is a shared medium and should be treated as part of the traffic-sensitive cost category, in which case the traffic-/non-traffic-related demarcation point will be located in the street cabinet.
Kadar je DSLAM/MSAN v zunanji omarici, je treba upoštevati, ali se prejšnja zanka med omarico in centralo/glavnim razdelilnikom uporablja skupno in jo je treba obravnavati kot del stroškovne kategorije, ki je odvisna od prometa. V tem primeru je razmejitvena točka med stroški, ki so odvisni od prometa, in stroški, ki niso odvisni od prometa, v zunanji omarici.
If dedicated capacity is allocated to the voice call termination service irrespective of the technology deployed, then the demarcation point remains at the level of the (remote) concentrator.
Če je namenska zmogljivost dodeljena storitvi zaključevanja glasovnih klicev ne glede na uporabljeno tehnologijo, ostane razdelitvena točka na ravni (oddaljenega) koncentratorja.
Following the approach outlined above, examples of costs which would be included in the termination service increment would include additional network capacity needed to transport additional wholesale termination traffic (e.g. additional network infrastructure to the extent that it is driven by the need to increase capacity for the purposes of carrying the additional wholesale termination traffic) as well as additional wholesale commercial costs directly related to the provision of the wholesale termination service to third parties.
Po zgoraj opisanem pristopu bi primeri stroškov, ki bi bili zajeti v prirastu storitve zaključevanja klicev, vključevali dodatno zmogljivost omrežja, ki je potrebna za prenos dodatnega veleprodajnega prometa zaključevanja klicev (npr. dodatna omrežna infrastruktura, če je potrebna za povečanje zmogljivosti za izvajanje dodatnega veleprodajnega prometa zaključevanja klicev) ter dodatne veleprodajne stroške iz prodaje, ki nastanejo neposredno pri zagotavljanju veleprodajne storitve zaključevanja klicev tretjim strankam.
To determine the efficient scale of an operator for the purposes of the cost model, NRAs should take into account that in fixed networks operators have the opportunity to build their networks in particular geographic areas and to focus on high-density routes and/or to rent relevant network inputs from the incumbents.
NRO morajo pri določanju učinkovitega obsega operaterja za namene modela izračunavanja stroškov upoštevati, da lahko operaterji v fiksnih omrežjih svoja omrežja zgradijo na posebnih geografskih območjih in se usmerijo na povezave z veliko prometa in/ali pa najamejo ustrezne povezave pri glavnem operaterju.
When defining the single efficient scale for the modelled operator, NRAs should therefore take into account the need to promote efficient entry while also recognising that under certain conditions smaller operators can produce at low unit costs in smaller geographic areas.
NRO morajo torej pri določanju enotnega učinkovitega obsega operaterja, pri katerem je uporabljen model, upoštevati, da je treba spodbujati učinkovit vstop na trg, obenem pa priznati, da imajo manjši operaterji pod nekaterimi pogoji na manjših geografskih območjih nižje stroške na enoto.
Furthermore, smaller operators that cannot match the largest operators′ scale advantages over broader geographic areas can be assumed to purchase wholesale inputs rather than self-provide termination services.
Poleg tega se za manjše operaterje, ki na večjih geografskih območjih nimajo prednosti, ki jih imajo večji operaterji, lahko domneva, da bodo veleprodajno storitev kupili in da ne bodo sami zagotavljali storitve zaključevanja klicev.
Principles for the calculation of wholesale termination rates in mobile networks
Načela izračunavanja veleprodajnih cen zaključevanja klicev v mobilnih omrežjih
The relevant incremental costs (i.e. avoidable costs) of the wholesale call termination service are the difference between the total long-run costs of an operator providing its full range of services and the total long-run costs of an operator not providing a wholesale call termination service to third parties.
Ustrezni prirastni stroški (tj. stroški, ki se jim je mogoče izogniti) veleprodajnega zaključevanja klicev so razlika med skupnimi dolgoročnimi stroški operaterja, ko izvaja vse svoje storitve, in skupnimi dolgoročnimi stroški istega operaterja, ko tretjim strankam ne zagotavlja veleprodajne storitve zaključevanja klicev.
These avoidable costs may be calculated by allocating traffic-related costs first to services other than wholesale call termination (e.g. call origination, SMS, MMS, etc.) with only the residual traffic-related costs being allocated to the wholesale voice call termination service.
Ti stroški, ki se jim je mogoče izogniti, se lahko izračunajo tako, da se stroški, odvisni od prometa, dodelijo najprej storitvam, ki niso veleprodajne storitve zaključevanja klicev (npr. vzpostavljanju povezave, storitvam SMS in MMS itd.), veleprodajni storitvi zaključevanja govornih klicev pa se dodelijo samo preostali stroški, odvisni od prometa.
The costs of the handset and the SIM card are not traffic-related and should be excluded from any costing model for wholesale voice call termination services.
Stroški telefonskega aparata in kartice SIM niso odvisni od prometa in jih je treba izključiti iz modelov izračunavanja stroškov za veleprodajne storitve zaključevanja govornih klicev.
Coverage can be best described as the capability or option to make a single call from any point in the network at a point in time, and capacity represents the additional network costs which are necessary to carry increasing levels of traffic.
Pokritost je mogoče najbolje opisati kot sposobnost ali možnost, da se v določenem trenutku opravi klic s katere koli točke v omrežju, medtem ko zmogljivost predstavlja dodatne omrežne stroške, ki nastanejo pri povečanem prometu.
The need to provide such coverage to subscribers will cause non-traffic-related costs to be incurred which should not be attributed to the wholesale call termination increment.
Zaradi zagotavljanja take pokritosti naročnikom bodo nastali stroški, ki niso odvisni od prometa in se ne smejo pripisati prirasti veleprodajnega zaključevanja klicev.
Investments in mature mobile markets are more driven by capacity increases and by the development of new services and this should be reflected in the cost model.
Povečanje zmogljivosti in razvoj novih storitev bolj spodbujata vlaganja v zrele trge mobilne telefonije, kar bi se moralo upoštevati tudi v modelu izračunavanja stroškov.