natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‘The agreement concluded on 5 November 1993 between the undertaking Sociedad Nacional de Industrias y Aplicaciones de Celulosa Española SA (SNIACE) and the Fondo de Garantía Salarial (FOGASA) did not constitute, on the date on which it was concluded, State Aid for the purposes of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.’
„Sporazum, podpisan dne 5. novembra 1993 med podjetjem Nacionalna družba za industrijo in celulozne obloge Španije d.o.o. (SNIACE) in Skladom za jamčenje plač (skladom FOGASA), na dan podpisa ni predstavljal državne pomoči v skladu s členom 87(1) Pogodbe o ES.“;
after the first paragraph, the following paragraph shall be inserted:
za prvim odstavkom se doda naslednji odstavek:
‘The following State Aid implemented by Spain in favour of SNIACE is incompatible with the common market:
„Državne pomoči, ki jih je podelila Španija v korist podjetja SNIACE in so neskladne s skupnim trgom, so:
the debt rescheduling agreement concluded on 8 March 1996 (as amended by the agreement of 7 May 1996 and subsequently by the agreement of 30 September 1997) between SNIACE and the Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social;
sporazum, podpisan dne 8. marca 1996 (spremenjen s sporazumom z dne 7. maja 1996 in kasneje s sporazumom z dne 30. septembra 1997) med podjetjem SNIACE in Javno blagajno za socialno varnost glede reprogramiranja dolgov;
the implementation of the agreement concluded on 5 November 1993 between SNIACE and FOGASA;
izvršitev sporazuma, podpisanega dne 5. novembra 1993 med podjetjem SNIACE in skladom FOGASA;
the agreement concluded on 31 October 1995 between SNIACE and FOGASA.’
sporazum, podpisan dne 31. oktobra 1995 med podjetjem SNIACE in skladom FOGASA.“;
Articles 2 and 3 shall be replaced by the following text:
člena 2 in 3 se nadomestita z naslednjimi:
Spain shall obtain from the recipient the repayment of the aid specified in the second paragraph of Article 1.
Španija mora od upravičenca prejeti vračilo podeljenih pomoči, določenih v členu 1(2).
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were made available to the recipient until the date of their actual recovery.
Znesek vračila je povečan za obresti, ki se plačajo od datuma, ko je bil znesek dodeljen upravičencu do datuma vračila.
The recovery of the aid specified in the second paragraph of Article 1 shall be immediate and effective.
Vračilo pomoči, določenih v členu 1(2), mora biti izvedeno takoj in učinkovito.
Spain shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months of the date of its notification.
Španija je odgovorna za nadzor nad to odločbo, ki mora biti izvedena v roku štirih mesecev od datuma njene razglasitve.
Spain shall submit the following information to the Commission within two months of notification of this Decision:
V roku dveh mesecev od razglasitve te odločbe mora Španija posredovati Komisiji naslednje informacije:
the total amount (principal and interest) to be recovered from the recipient;
celoten znesek (glavnico in obresti), ki ga mora vrniti upravičenec;
a detailed description of the measures already adopted and planned for the purpose of complying with this Decision;
podroben opis že izvedenih in predvidenih ukrepov za izpolnjevanje te odločbe;
the documents proving that the recipient has been ordered to repay the aid.
dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da je bilo upravičencu odrejeno, da povrne pomoči.
Spain shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures adopted pursuant to this Decision until the recovery of the aid specified in the second paragraph of Article 1 has been concluded.
Španija bo Komisijo obveščala o poteku nacionalnih ukrepov, sprejetih za izvedbo te odločbe do povračila celotnega zneska pomoči, določenih v členu 1(2).
At the Commission’s request, it shall immediately submit information on the measures already adopted and planned for the purpose of complying with this Decision.
Na prošnjo Komisije bo nemudoma predložila informacije o že izvedenih in predvidenih ukrepih za izpolnjevanje te odločbe.
It shall also provide detailed information on the amounts of aid and interest already recovered from the recipient.’
Prav tako bo zagotovila podrobne informacije o že prejetih zneskih pomoči in obresti, ki jih je vrnil upravičenec.“
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Spain
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Kraljevino Španijo.
OJ L 149, 16.6.1999, p. 40.
UL L 149, 16.6.1999, str. 40.
Paragraph 48 of the Tubacex judgment.
Odstavek 48 sodbe „Tubacex“.
OJ C 110, 15.4.2000, p. 33.
UL C 110, 15.4.2000, str. 33.
OJ L 11, 16.1.2001, p. 46.
UL L 11, 16.1.2001, str.46.
Recital 30.
Odstavek 30.
Case C-525/04 [2007] ECR I-9947.
Zadeva C-525/04. Priporočilo Rec 2007, str. I-9947.
BOE (Boletín Oficial del Estado — Official State Gazette) No 92, 17.4.1985, p. 10203.
Ur. l. Španije št. 92, 17.4.1985, str. 10203.
BOE No 154, 20.6.1994, p. 20658.
Ur. l. Španije št. 154, 20.6.1994, str. 20658.
Letter from FOGASA dated 22 August 2008, p. 2, sent by the Spanish authorities.
Dopis FOGASA z dne 22. avgusta 2008, str. 2, predložena s strani španskih oblasti.
Paragraph 32.
Odstavek 32.
Letter from the Spanish authorities of 4 July 2005, Annex I.
Dopis španskih oblasti z dne 4. julija 2005, Priloga I.
Spain’s letter of 21 March 2000: ‘the interest applied as a consequence of the rescheduling protects the creditor from the loss that it will incur as the money loses value over time’.
Dopis Španije z dne 21. marca 2000: „Obrestna mera, uporabljena v primeru odložitve ščiti upnika pred devalvacijo, do katere lahko pride zaradi pretečenega časovnega obdobja“.
The Spanish authorities’ reply of 4 July 2005: ‘Neither FOGASA nor the [TGSS] have sufficient data to estimate the value of the undertaking’s properties at that time.’
Odgovor španskih oblasti z dne 4. julija 2005: „Ne FOGASA ne [TGSS] nimata zadostnih podatkov, da bi ocenili vrednost imetja podjetja v tistem obdobju.“
The Spanish authorities’ reply of 29 September 2005.
Odgovor španskih oblasti z dne 29. septembra 2005.
The Spanish authorities informed the Commission (letter of 28 February 2005 in reply to the Commission’s letter of 3 December 2004) that a number of meetings had been organised between SNIACE and the TGSS.
Španske oblasti so Komisijo obvestile (dopis z dne 28. februarja 2005 kot odgovor na dopis Komisije z dne 3. decembra 2004), daje med podjetjem SNIACE in TGSS potekalo več sestankov.
Point 31 of the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (OJ C 288, 9.10.1999, p. 2).
Točka 31 Smernic Skupnosti o državnih pomočeh za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah (UL C 288, 9.10.1999, str. 2).
Point 34 of the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (OJ C 244, 1.10.2004, p. 2).
Točka 34 Smernic Skupnosti o državnih pomočeh za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah (UL C 244, 1.10.2004, str. 2).
See point 3.2.2(i) of the 1994 Guidelines: ‘… aid must be linked to a viable restructuring/recovery programme …’.
Glej točko 3.2.2(i) Smernic iz leta 1994: „[…] pomoč mora biti povezana s programom prestrukturiranja in oživitve […]“
Letter of the Spanish authorities sent by fax on 30 June 1997, p. 2.
Dopis španskih oblasti, posredovan po faksu dne 30. junija 1997, str. 2.
Second paragraph of point 4 of the Commission Communication on regional aid systems (OJ C 31, 3.2.1979, p. 9).
Drugi odstavek točke 4 Obvestila Komisije o sistemih regionalnih pomoči (UL C 31, 3.2.1979, str. 9).
Point 4.15 of the Guidelines on national regional aid (OJ C 74, 10.3.1998, p. 9).
Točka 4.15 Smernic o regionalnih pomočeh (UL C 74, 10.3.1998, str. 9).
OJ C 346, 30.12.1992, p. 2 and OJ C 94, 30.3.1996, p. 11.
UL C 346, 30.12.1992, str. 2 in UL C 94, 30.3.1996, str. 11.
(Awaiting publication).
(Čaka na objavo.)
Paragraph 83.
Odstavek 83.
The beneficiary of the measures is SNIACE, an undertaking founded in 1939.
Prejemnik pomoči je podjetje SNIACE, ustanovljeno leta 1939.
The undertaking produces cellulose, paper, viscose fibres, synthetic fibres and sodium sulphate.
To podjetje proizvaja celulozo, papir, viskozna vlakna, sintetična vlakna in natrijev sulfat.
The principal corresponded to arrears in payment of social security contributions from February 1991 to February 1997.
Glavnica je bila skladna z zamudo pri plačilu prispevkov za socialno zavarovanje od februarja 1991 do februarja 1997.
Payment was to be made in 120 monthly instalments. During the first two years, only the interest, calculated at the statutory rate of 7,5 %, was payable, whereas in years three to 10 both principal and interest were to be repaid at annual repayment rates of 5 % (from October 1999 to September 2001), 10 % (from October 2001 to September 2003), 15 % (from October 2003 to September 2005) and 20 % (from October 2005 to September 2007).
Plačilo je bilo potrebno izvesti v 120 mesečnih obrokih, pri čemer se je prvi dve leti odplačevalo le obresti po 7,5-odstotni zakoniti obrestni meri, medtem ko se je glavnica odplačevala od tretjega do desetega leta skupaj z obrestmi, skladnimi z letno izravnavo, ki je znašala 5 % (od oktobra 1999 do septembra 2001), 10 % (od oktobra 2001 do septembra 2003), 15 % (od oktobra 2003 do septembra 2005) in 20 % (od oktobra 2005 do septembra 2007).
As has been mentioned in recital (13), the TGSS concluded an agreement with SNIACE on 8 March 1996, which was amended on 7 May 1996 and 30 September 1997.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 21, je TGSS podpisala sporazum s podjetjem SNIACE dne 8. marca 1996, ta pa je bil spremenjen dne 7. maja 1996 in 30. septembra 1997.
Although it was concluded approximately 18 months after the first agreement was concluded, the final agreement related to the same debts.
Kljub temu, da je bil podpisan približno 18 mesecev po prvem sporazumu, se je končni sporazum nanašal na iste dolgove.
Moreover, the Spanish authorities were unable to respond favourably to the Commission’s request (letter of 7 August 2008 D/53117) that it be provided with the minutes of the meetings that took place between the TGSS and SNIACE in 1994 [18].
Poleg tega španske oblasti niso mogle pozitivno odgovoriti na prošnjo Komisije (dopis z dne 7. avgusta 2008 D/53117), naj ji predložijo zapisnike sestankov, ki so potekali med TGSS in podjetjem SNIACE v letu 1994 [18].
Those records would have enabled the Commission to determine the context of the negotiations and assess the TGSS’s opinion on SNIACE’s actual prospects of fulfilling its commitments both past and future.
Ti dokumenti bi namreč Komisiji omogočili, da bi se seznanila s kontekstom pogajanj in ocenila mnenje TGSS glede resničnih možnosti, da se podjetje SNIACE sooči s svojimi obveznostmi, tako tistimi, ki se nanašajo na preteklost kot tudi na prihodnje.
A programme of that kind must include, inter alia, internal restructuring measures and compensatory measures, as required by the Eighth Report of the Commission on Competition Policy of 1979 (points 227 and 228) and the guidelines adopted from 1994 [21].
Tovrsten načrt mora med drugim vsebovati notranje ukrepe za prestrukturiranje in kompenzacijske ukrepe, tako kot zahteva Osmo poročilo o politiki konkurenčnosti iz leta 1979 (točki 227 in 228) in smernice, sprejete od leta 1994 dalje [21].
The absence of a restructuring plan confirms that the sole purpose of the aid was to keep the firm operating without requiring any restructuring measures in return.
Dejstvo, da tega načrta ni, potrjuje, da je bil edini cilj pomoči ohranitev poslovanja podjetja, ne da bi se zahtevalo kakršno koli kompenzacijo v smislu prestrukturiranja.
ECR I-2459.
Priporočilo Rec. 1999, str. I-2459.
ECR II-3597.
Priporočilo Rec. 2004, str. II-3597.
Point 227 of the Eighth Report of the European Commission on Competition Policy of 1979.
Točka 227 Osmega poročila Evropske komisije o politiki konkurenčnosti iz leta 1979.
Point 3.2.2(i) of the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (OJ C 368, 31.12.1994, p. 12).
Točka 3.2.2(i) Smernic Skupnosti o državnih pomočeh za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah (UL C 368, 31.12.1994, str. 12).
on the measures C 7/07 (ex NN 82/06 and NN 83/06) implemented by the United Kingdom in favour of Royal Mail
o ukrepih C 7/07 (ex NN 82/06 in NN 83/06) Združenega kraljestva v korist družbe Royal Mail
(Notified under document C(2009) 2486)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 2486)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provision(s) cited above [1] and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenim členom ali členi [1], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
On 3 December 2002, Deutsche Post AG (hereinafter ‘DP’) lodged a complaint against alleged cross-subsidies granted to the parcel activities of Royal Mail Group plc (‘Royal Mail’ or ‘RM’).
Družba Deutsche Post AG (v nadaljnjem besedilu: DP) je 3. decembra 2002 vložila pritožbo zoper domnevne navzkrižne subvencije, odobrene dejavnostim pošiljanja paketov družbe Royal Mail Group plc (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Royal Mail ali RM).
On 27 May 2003, the Commission approved a series of measures in favour of Post Office Limited (‘POL’) which is a subsidiary of RM (case N 784/02) [2].
Komisija je 27. maja 2003 odobrila vrsto ukrepov v korist podjetja Post Office Limited (v nadaljnjem besedilu: POL), ki je odvisna družba družbe RM (zadeva N 784/02) [2].
Under these measures, compensation was granted to POL, financed through a reserve (‘the mails reserve’) constituted from surplus cash generated by RM.
Na podlagi teh ukrepov je bilo družbi POL dodeljeno nadomestilo, ki se je financiralo prek rezerve (v nadaljevanju: poštne rezerve), sestavljene iz presežnih denarnih sredstev, ki jih je ustvarila družba RM.
On 22 February 2006 the Commission raised no objection to the continuation of one of these measures (rural network support) for a further period (case N 166/05) [3].
Komisija 22. februarja 2006 ni vložila ugovora zoper nadaljevanje enega od teh ukrepov (podpora podeželske mreže) za nadaljnje obdobje (zadeva N 166/05) [3].
On 8 October 2003, DP lodged an action for annulment (T-343/03) against the N 784/02 Commission Decision, arguing that this decision had implicitly rejected its CP 206/02 complaint.
Družba DP je 8. oktobra 2003 vložila tožbo za razglasitev ničnosti (T-343/03) Odločbe Komisije N 784/02, v kateri je trdila, da je bila s to odločbo implicitno zavrnjena pritožba CP 206/02 te družbe.
On 16 November 2005, the Court of First Instance rejected the action of DP saying that the N 784/02 Decision did not imply the rejection of the complaint and that the Commission was carrying on investigations (as demonstrated by the correspondence presented before the Court).
Sodišče prve stopnje je 16. novembra 2005 zavrnilo tožbo družbe DP in navedlo, da Odločba N 784/02 ne pomeni, da je pritožba zavrnjena, ter da Komisija izvaja preiskave (kot je bilo pred Sodiščem dokazano s korespondenco).
On 10 August 2006, DP sent a letter which invited the Commission to take a position on its complaint of 2002 within the period of two months, on the basis of Article 232 of the Treaty.
Družba DP je 10. avgusta 2006 poslala dopis, v katerem je Komisijo pozvala, naj na podlagi člena 232 Pogodbe v dveh mesecih oblikuje stališče do pritožbe te družbe.
The same letter contained information concerning a series of alleged new State aid measures.
Isti dopis je vseboval informacije v zvezi z vrsto domnevnih novih ukrepov državne pomoči.
These measures are distinct from those which were the subject of the complaint of 2002 and the complaint against them was therefore treated as a separate complaint which was attributed the reference CP 221/06, subsequently NN 83/06.
Ti ukrepi se razlikujejo od ukrepov, obravnavanih v pritožbi iz leta 2002, zato je bila pritožba zoper njih obravnavana kot ločena pritožba in ji je bila dodeljena številka CP 221/06, pozneje spremenjena v NN 83/06.
The alleged measures were as follows:
Domnevni ukrepi so bili:
a transfer of GBP 850 million to a special account dedicated to finance RM’s pensions;
prenos 850 milijonov GBP na poseben račun, namenjen financiranju pokojnin družbe RM;
decision by Department of Trade and Industry to increase the amount of a loan granted to RM from GBP 844 million to GBP 900 million;
odločitev ministrstva za trgovino in industrijo (Department of Trade and Industry), da poveča znesek posojila družbi RM z 844 milijonov GBP na 900 milijonov GBP;
violation of the Commission’s decision in case N 166/05 concerning support for POL’s rural network, since GBP 150 million was transferred to POL directly from the State budget and not, as approved by the Decision, from a special, ring-fenced reserve.
kršitev odločbe Komisije v zadevi N 166/05 v zvezi s podporo podeželske mreže družbe POL, saj je bilo 150 milijonov GBP družbi POL nakazanih neposredno iz državnega proračuna, in ne iz posebne namenske rezerve, kot je bilo odobreno v odločbi.
By letter of 27 October 2006, the Mail Competition Forum (MCF), a body representing entrants to the postal market in the UK, submitted a complaint about the special account dedicated to finance RM’s pensions also covered by DP’s second complaint.
Mail Competition Forum (MCF), organ, ki zastopa subjekte, ki vstopajo na poštni trg v Združenem kraljestvu, je z dopisom z dne 27. oktobra 2006 predložil pritožbo v zvezi s posebnim računom, namenjenim financiranju pokojnin družbe RM, ki ga zajema tudi druga pritožba družbe DP.
The complaint of MCF was attributed the reference CP 164/06, subsequently NN 82/06.
Pritožbi MCF je bila dodeljena številka CP 164/06, pozneje NN 82/06.
By letter of 7 December 2006, the Commission informed DP that it did not find sufficient grounds for continuing the investigation concerning complaint CP 206/02, and that if it did not hear from DP within 20 working days, the complaint would be considered withdrawn.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 7. decembra 2006 obvestila družbo DP, da ni našla zadostnih razlogov za nadaljevanje preiskave v zvezi s pritožbo CP 206/02 in da bo štela pritožbo za umaknjeno, če od družbe DP ne prejme odgovora v 20 delovnih dneh.
No response was received within the deadline.
V tem roku ni bil prejet noben odgovor.
That complaint was therefore considered withdrawn.
Pritožba se je tako štela za umaknjeno.
On 7 December 2006, the UK notified the proposed extension of another of the measures in favour of POL (debt payment funding) covered by N 784/02 which was otherwise due to expire in 2007. The Commission authorised this aid under reference N 822/06 by decision of 7 March 2007 [4].
Združeno kraljestvo je 7. decembra 2006 poslalo obvestilo o predlaganem podaljšanju drugega od ukrepov v korist družbe POL (financiranje plačila dolgov), ki ga zajema zadeva N 784/02 in ki naj bi se sicer iztekel v letu 2007 [4].
On 8 February 2007, the UK communicated to the Commission the terms of an announcement concerning ‘the pensions measure’, the GBP 900 million loan facility and also a new loan of GBP 300 million to Royal Mail.
Združeno kraljestvo je 8. februarja 2007 Komisiji sporočilo pogoje obvestila v zvezi s „pokojninskim ukrepom“, posojilom v višini 900 milijonov GBP in tudi novim posojilom družbi Royal Mail v višini 300 milijonov GBP.
On 21 February 2007, the Commission opened an investigation procedure on the following measures:
Komisija je 21. februarja 2007 začela postopek preiskave v zvezi z naslednjimi ukrepi:
a GBP 500 million loan granted in 2001, repayable after 2021 and granted at a fixed interest rate, which financed Royal Mail’s overseas acquisitions;
posojilom v višini 500 milijonov GBP, odobrenim v letu 2001 in vračljivim po letu 2021 po fiksni obrestni meri, s katerim so se financirali čezmorski prevzemi družbe Royal Mail;
GBP 1 billion of loan facilities made available to Royal Mail from State sources in 2003, of which GBP 900 million was to be extended after 2007;
posojilnimi sredstvi v višini 1 milijarde GBP, ki so bila dana na voljo družbi Royal Mail iz državnih sredstev v letu 2003, od katerih naj bi se posojilo v višini 900 milijonov GBP podaljšalo po letu 2007;
‘The pensions measure’: placing GBP 850 million in an ‘escrow account’ which will lengthen the period over which Royal Mail needs to address the current deficit in its pension fund and will therefore reduce the contributions it makes in the initial years of the period;
„pokojninskim ukrepom“: dodelitvijo 850 milijonov GBP sredstev na „depozitni račun“, s čimer se bo podaljšalo obdobje, v katerem mora družba Royal Mail ukrepati v zvezi s sedanjim primanjkljajem v svojem pokojninskem skladu, in s čimer bo tako zmanjšala prispevke v prvih letih tega obdobja;
the loan of GBP 300 million announced on 8 February 2007.
posojilom v višini 300 milijonov GBP, ki je bilo napovedano 8. februarja 2007.
The decision of 21 February confirmed the withdrawal of complaint CP 206/02 and confirmed that the Commission raised no objection to the funding of the authorised measures for POL from the State budget rather than from the mails reserve.
V odločbi z dne 21. februarja je bil potrjen umik pritožbe CP 206/02, potrjeno pa je bilo tudi, da Komisija ni nasprotovala financiranju dovoljenih ukrepov za družbo POL iz državnega proračuna namesto iz poštnih rezerv.
By letter dated 22 February 2007, the Commission notified the United Kingdom of its decision to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the Treaty in respect of the measures listed in recital 11.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 22. februarja 2007 Združenemu kraljestvu sporočila odločitev, da bo sprožila postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES v zvezi z ukrepi iz uvodne izjave 11.
The Commission’s decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [5].
Odločitev Komisije, da sproži postopek, je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [5].
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measures.
Komisija je pozvala vse zainteresirane stranke, naj predložijo svoje pripombe k ukrepom.
The beneficiary of the alleged State aid
Upravičenec do domnevne državne pomoči
The beneficiary of the alleged State aid is Royal Mail Group plc, subsequently Royal Mail Group Ltd (‘RM’) which (through a holding company, Royal Mail Holdings plc) is a 100 % State-owned company.
Upravičenec do domnevne državne pomoči je družba Royal Mail Group plc, pozneje Royal Mail Group Ltd („RM“), ki je (prek holdinške družbe Royal Mail Holdings plc) v 100-odstotni državni lasti.
RM is the UK’s main postal operator and had a legal monopoly over most basic letter services until the end of 2005.
Družba RM je glavni poštni operater v Združenem kraljestvu in je imela zakonski monopol nad večino osnovnih storitev pisemske pošte vse do konca leta 2005.
The post office network is operated by POL, which is a subsidiary of RM.
Poštno mrežo upravlja družba POL, ki je hčerinska družba RM.
In 2003, a part of the parcels activity (including the provision of a universal service for parcels handed in at post offices) was transferred from Parcelforce to the letters division of RM and is now operated through that infrastructure.
Del dejavnosti pošiljanja paketov (vključno s ponudbo univerzalne storitve za pakete, ki se oddajo na pošti) je bil leta 2003 prenesen z družbe Parcelforce na enoto za pošiljanje pisem v družbi RM in se zdaj vodi prek njene infrastrukture.
Today, Parcelforce only handles time-critical parcels.
Danes Parcelforce pošilja samo nujne pakete.
Financial regime of the beneficiary and relationship with the State
Finančna ureditev upravičenca in njegovo razmerje z državo
Under the regime in existence before the incorporation and transfers of 2001, there was no requirement for The Post Office Corporation to pay any dividends to the UK authorities and it did not do so.
Na podlagi ureditve, ki je obstajala pred registracijo družbe in prenosi v letu 2001, družbi The Post Office Corporation ni bilo treba plačevati dividend organom Združenega kraljestva in tega tudi ni počela.