natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Moreover — and of equal importance — there is no publicly available information on the price of sweetcorn.
Poleg tega je enako pomembno, da ni javno dostopnih podatkov o cenah sladke koruze.
The above data could only be obtained in the framework of a review.
Navedene podatke je bilo mogoče pridobiti samo s pregledom.
An indexation of the minimum price would therefore be impossible, even if a correlation had been established.
Indeksiranje minimalne cene bi bilo zato nemogoče, četudi bi se ugotovila povezava.
Indexation on the evolution of the purchase price of cans
Indeksiranje na razvoj nakupnih cen pločevink
The cost of cans, the other main input, represents a part of the total cost of production that is not significant enough to permit an indexation on can prices alone.
Stroški pločevink, drugega glavnega vložka, so del skupnih proizvodnih stroškov, ki niso dovolj znatni, da bi omogočili indeksiranje samo na cenah pločevink.
In any case, the investigation has shown that can prices remained stable between the original IP and the RIP, i.e. no correlation whatsoever with the price of the product concerned could be established.
V vsakem primeru je preiskava pokazala, da so cene pločevink ostale stabilne med prvotnim OP in OPP, tj. nobene povezave s cenami zadevnega proizvoda ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti.
It is therefore noted that main pre-conditions for indexation, as outlined in recital 23, are not met.
Zato gre omeniti, da ni izpolnjen prvi pogoj za indeksiranje, kot ga navaja uvodna izjava 23.
The possibility to index the minimum import prices to the evolution of the price of cans was therefore not considered further.
Možnost indeksiranja minimalnih uvoznih cen z razvojem cen pločevink se zato ni več upoštevala.
In view of all the elements listed above, the investigation confirmed that there is no possibility to index the minimum import prices in order to address the fluctuating price of the product concerned.
Zaradi vsega navedenega je preiskava potrdila, da ni možnosti za indeksiranje minimalnih uvoznih cen, s čimer bi se zajelo nihanje cen zadevnega proizvoda.
Individual reasons not to accept pending undertaking offers
Posamezni razlogi proti sprejetju nerešenih ponudb za zavezo
Five out of the 10 companies with pending undertaking offers did not reply to the questionnaire and have therefore been considered as non-cooperating in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Od desetih družb z nerešenimi ponudbami za zavezo jih pet ni izpolnilo vprašalnika in se zato štejejo za nesodelujoče po členu 18 osnovne uredbe.
For reasons of general policy, non-cooperation should not be rewarded and thus the pending undertaking offers of those companies cannot be accepted.
Iz razlogov splošne politike se nesodelovanje ne bi smelo nagraditi in zato nerešenih ponudb za zavezo navedenih družb ni mogoče sprejeti.
It was also found that another company absorbed the anti-dumping duties, at least with regard to certain transactions.
Ugotovilo se je tudi, da je ena družba vsaj glede nekaterih transakcij absorbirala protidampinške dajatve.
Such practice negatively affects the relationship of trust which forms the basis for acceptance of price undertakings.
Takšno ravnanje spodkoplje odnos zaupanja, ki je temelj za sprejetje cenovnih zavez.
The undertaking offer of this company is therefore not acceptable.
Ponudba za zavezo navedene družbe zato ni sprejemljiva.
Another company established a related company outside Thailand which produces the product concerned.
Ena družba je zunaj Tajske ustanovila povezano družbo, ki proizvaja zadevni proizvod.
The company offered to include this subsidiary in the undertaking offer.
Družba je ponudila vključitev navedene hčerinske družbe v ponudbo za zavezo.
However, the existence of such a subsidiary constitutes a high risk of cross-compensation.
Vendar je obstoj take hčerinske družbe zelo nevaren za navzkrižno izravnavanje.
The undertaking offer of this company therefore also has to be rejected.
Zato je tudi za navedeno družbo treba zavrniti ponudbo za zavezo.
Another company ceased production of the product concerned and leased the production facilities to a newly established related company.
Ena družba je prenehala proizvajati zadevni proizvod in proizvodne obrate dala v zakup novoustanovljeni povezani družbi.
Individual reasons for withdrawal of an undertaking
Posamezni razlogi za preklic zaveze
The verification at the premises of one of the companies with an existing undertaking revealed a number of breaches, as detailed in Commission Decision 2009/708/EC [6].
Preverjanje prostorov ene družbe s sprejeto zavezo je odkrilo vrsto kršitev, ki so podrobno navedene v Sklepu Komisije 2009/708/ES [6].
On the basis of the above facts and considerations, it is considered that price undertakings with fixed minimum import prices are no longer appropriate to counteract the injurious effect of dumping and that there is no possibility of indexing the minimum import prices in order to address the problem.
Na podlagi teh dejstev in premislekov se šteje, da cenovne zaveze s fiksno minimalno uvozno ceno niso več primerne za izravnavanje škodljivega učinka dampinga in da ni mogoče indeksirati minimalnih uvoznih cen za rešitev težave.
In these circumstances, the undertaking offers should be rejected and the accepted undertakings should be withdrawn.
V teh okoliščinah bi bilo treba ponudbe za zavezo zavrniti in preklicati obstoječi zavezi.
Moreover, eight out of the 10 pending undertaking offers should be rejected due to the individual reasons outlined above.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba od desetih nerešenih ponudb za zavezo zavrniti osem zaradi prej navedenih posameznih razlogov.
In addition, one of the two existing price undertakings should also be withdrawn due to non-compliance with the undertaking.
Preklicati bi bilo treba tudi eno od dveh obstoječih cenovnih zavez zaradi neizpolnjevanja zaveze.
It was therefore concluded that the review investigation limited to the form of the measure should be terminated, that the undertaking offers in question should not be accepted and that the existing undertakings should be withdrawn.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da bi bilo treba končati preiskavo v zvezi s pregledom, omejeno na obliko ukrepa, ter da se zadevne ponudbe za zavezo ne bi smele sprejeti in da bi bilo treba preklicati obstoječi zavezi.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the decision to reject the pending undertaking offers and withdraw the existing undertakings was made and were given the opportunity to comment.
Vse stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta odločitev o zavrnitvi nerešenih ponudb za zavezo in preklicu obstoječih zavez, in so imele možnost predložiti svoje pripombe.
Some parties argued that an undertaking cannot be withdrawn if all clauses of the undertaking have been respected.
Nekatere stranke so trdile, da zaveze ni mogoče preklicati, če so izpolnjeni vsi pogoji zaveze.
Instead, they claim, the company should be given the opportunity to revise its minimum import prices in accordance with the market evolution.
Zahtevali so, da bi morala namesto tega družba imeti možnost, da spremeni svoje minimalne uvozne cene v skladu z razvojem trga.
In response to this argument, it has to be underlined that the existing undertakings have first and foremost to be withdrawn, just like the pending undertaking offers have to be rejected, for general reasons of practicability.
V odgovor na to utemeljitev je treba poudariti, da je treba preklicati obstoječi zavezi, tako kot je treba zavrniti nerešene ponudbe za zavezo najprej in predvsem iz splošnih razlogov izvedljivosti.
As outlined above, the review has shown that sweetcorn is no longer suitable for a price undertaking, regardless of whether or not individual companies complied with the provisions of the undertaking or whether they are willing to revise the minimum import prices.
Kot že navedeno, je pregled pokazal, da sladka koruza ni več primerna za cenovno zavezo, ne glede na to, ali posamezne družbe izpolnjujejo določbe zaveze ali so pripravljene spremeniti minimalne uvozne cene.
In any case, in view of the price volatility established during the review, a revision of the minimum import prices would only be feasible by introducing an indexation formula.
Zaradi spremenljivosti cen, ki jo je ugotovil pregled, bi bila sprememba minimalnih uvoznih cen mogoča samo z uvedbo enačbe za indeksiranje.
However, the review has shown that there is no basis for it.
Vendar je pregled pokazal, da ni pogojev za to.
One company contested that their purchase prices of sweetcorn and their sale prices of the product concerned showed an increasing volatility and upward trend between the original IP and the RIP and claimed that the increase in their sale prices of the product concerned was only caused by the minimum import price.
Ena družba je ugovarjala, da se za njene nakupne cene sladke koruze in prodajne cene zadevnega proizvoda kaže čedalje večja spremenljivost in gibanje navzgor med prvotnim OP in OPP, in je trdila, da je povišanje njenih prodajnih cen zadevnega proizvoda povzročila samo minimalna uvozna cena.
It was therefore argued that there are no reasons to withdraw the acceptance of their price undertaking.
Zato je trdila, da ni razloga za preklic njene cenovne zaveze.
However, data provided by the company do not corroborate the claim.
Podatki, ki jih je predložila družba, pa ne potrjujejo te trditve.
The purchase prices of sweetcorn did show an increasing trend although slightly less than the average.
Za nakupne cene sladke koruze se kaže gibanje navzgor, čeprav nekoliko pod povprečjem.
On the other hand, their sale prices of the product concerned during the RIP were significantly above the relevant minimum import price and showed a further increasing trend in the second half of 2008.
Po drugi strani so bile njene prodajne cene zadevnega proizvoda med OPP občutno nad relevantno minimalno uvozno ceno in se zanje kaže gibanje navzgor v drugi polovici leta 2008.
Some parties argued further that the rejection of the pending price undertaking offers and the withdrawal of the existing price undertakings is not in line with Article 15 of the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement which obliges WTO members to give regard to the special situation of developing countries.
Nekatere stranke so še trdile, da zavrnitev nerešenih ponudb za zavezo in preklic obstoječih cenovnih zavez ni v skladu s členom 15 Protidampinškega sporazuma STO, po katerem člani STO morajo upoštevati posebne razmere v državah v razvoju.
In response to this submission, it has to be stressed that the Commission actively considered, with an open mind, all possible options, including indexation of the fixed minimum import prices, in order to overcome the practicability problems of the undertakings.
V odgovor na to je bilo poudarjeno, da je Komisija dejavno in nepristransko upoštevala vse možnosti, vključno z indeksiranjem fiksnih minimalnih uvoznih cen, da bi rešila vprašanje izvedljivosti zavez.
Thus, possibilities of constructive remedies have been explored in this case.
Tako je preučila vse možnosti konstruktivnih rešitev v tem primeru.
However, the findings of the investigation as set out in recitals 22 to 32 did not give any leeway in this regard.
Vendar ugotovitve preiskave iz uvodnih izjav 22 do 32 ne omogočajo prožnosti pri tem.
Other parties requested formal suspension of the measures as a result of the review findings.
Druge stranke so zahtevale uradni preklic ukrepov zaradi ugotovitev pregleda.
As already outlined in recital 12, such a request is being assessed outside the current review investigation,
Kot že navaja uvodna izjava 12, se taka zahteva obravnava zunaj sedanje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom –
Article 1(3) of Regulation (EC) No 682/2007 shall be deleted.
Člen 1(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 682/2007 se črta.
Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 682/2007 shall be renumbered as Article 1(3).
Člen 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 682/2007 se preštevilči v člen 1(3).
Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 682/2007 shall be deleted.
Člen 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 682/2007 se črta.
Articles 3 and 4 of Regulation (EC) No 682/2007 shall be renumbered as Articles 2 and 3 respectively.
Člena 3 in 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 682/2007 se preštevilčita v člen 2 oziroma 3.
Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 682/2007 shall be deleted.
Priloga II k Uredbi (ES) št. 682/2007 se črta.
The partial interim review of Regulation (EC) No 682/2007 is hereby terminated with the non-acceptance of the undertaking offers.
Delni vmesni pregled Uredbe (ES) št. 682/2007 se konča s tem, da se ponudbe za zavezo ne sprejmejo.
The analysis showed a clear upward trend of import prices of the product concerned from Thailand since the original IP, in particular since the end of 2006.
Analiza je jasno pokazala, da so se uvozne cene zadevnega proizvoda iz Tajske gibale navzgor od prvotnega OP, zlasti od konca leta 2006.
Despite a price decrease during the RIP, prices remained significantly above the price level of the original IP.
Kljub znižanju cen med OPP cene ostajajo občutno nad ravnjo cen iz prvotnega OP.
Data available for 2008 point to yet another increase.
Razpoložljivi podatki za leto 2008 kažejo na novo zvišanje.
Furthermore, an analysis of the Thai prices for the representative can size demonstrated an even higher price fluctuation since the original IP.
Poleg tega je analiza tajskih cen za reprezentativno velikost pločevinke od prvotnega OP pokazala še močnejše nihanje cen.
Sale prices varied by more than 30 % in the period between the first quarter of 2005 and the last quarter of the RIP.
Prodajne cene so se spreminjale za več kot 30 % med prvim četrtletjem leta 2005 in zadnjim četrtletjem OPP.
As can be seen from Table 3, average purchase prices of sweetcorn in Thailand and in the EU increased significantly compared to the original IP.
Kot je razvidno iz razpredelnice 3, so se povprečne nakupne cene sladke koruze na Tajskem in v EU občutno povišale v primerjavi s prvotnim OP.
Prices at the end of the RIP were significantly higher than during the original IP.
Cene so bile na koncu OPP občutno višje kot med prvotnim OP.
Data available for the second half of 2008 confirm the price increase.
Razpoložljivi podatki za drugo polovico leta 2008 potrjujejo povišanje cen.
It is also evident that, other than in the EU, purchase prices in Thailand show an increasing volatility within a given year, in particular since the end of 2006.
Razvidno je tudi, da so razen v EU nakupne cene v posameznem letu čedalje bolj spremenljive, zlasti od konca leta 2006.
The difference between the lowest and the highest price in Thailand varied by almost 40 % in the period between the original IP and the RIP.
Razlika med najnižjo in najvišjo ceno na Tajskem se je spreminjala za skoraj 40 % v času med prvotnim OP in OPP.
Index, Q1/2005 = 100
Indeks, Q1/2005 = 100
Commission Regulation (EC) No 848/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 848/2009
This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 September 2009.
Ta uredba začne veljati 18. septembra 2009.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 849/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 849/2009
These prices and duties have been last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 843/2009 [4].
Navedene cene in dolžnosti so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 843/2009 [4].
OJ L 245, 17.9.2009, p. 9.
UL L 245, 17.9.2009, str. 9.
Amended representative prices and additional import duties applicable to white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 17029095 from 18 September 2009
Spremenjene reprezentativne cene in dodatne uvozne dajatve za beli in surovi sladkor ter proizvode z oznako KN 17029095, ki se uporabljajo od 18. septembra 2009
Commission Regulation (EC) No 850/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 850/2009
Export refunds on milk and milk products applicable from 18 September 2009
Izvozna nadomestila za mleko in mlečne izdelke, ki se uporabljajo od 18. septembra 2009
the destinations referred to in Article 33(1), Article 41(1) and Article 42(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 612/2009 (OJ L 186, 17.7.2009, p. 1).
na destinacije iz odstavka 1 člena 33, odstavka 1 člena 41 in odstavka 1 člena 42 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 612/2009 (UL L 186, 17.7.2009, str. 1).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 851/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 851/2009
Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products [3], and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 15 September 2009.
V skladu s členom 6 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1454/2007 z dne 10. decembra 2007 o določitvi skupnih pravil za uvedbo razpisnega postopka za določitev izvoznih nadomestil za nekatere kmetijske proizvode [3] in po pregledu predloženih ponudb je treba določiti najvišji znesek izvoznega nadomestila za razpisno obdobje, ki se zaključi 15. septembra 2009.
For the standing invitation to tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 619/2008, for the tendering period ending on 15 September 2009, the maximum amount of refund for the products and destinations referred to in Article 1(a) and (b) and in Article 2 respectively of that Regulation shall be as shown in the Annex to this Regulation.
V okviru stalnega razpisa, odprtega z Uredbo (ES) št. 619/2008 za razpisno obdobje, ki se zaključi 15. septembra 2009, je najvišji znesek nadomestila za proizvode in namembne kraje, navedene v členu 1(a) in (b) ter členu 2 navedene uredbe, določen v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 852/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 852/2009
Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products [3] and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 15 September 2009.
V skladu s členom 6 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1454/2007 z dne 10. decembra 2007 o določitvi skupnih pravil za uvedbo razpisnega postopka za določitev izvoznih nadomestil za nekatere kmetijske proizvode [3] in po pregledu predloženih ponudb je treba določiti najvišji znesek izvoznega nadomestila za razpisno obdobje, ki se zaključi 15. septembra 2009.
For the standing invitation to tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 619/2008, for the tendering period ending on 15 September 2009, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(c) and in Article 2 of that Regulation shall be EUR 25,80/100 kg.
V okviru stalnega razpisa, odprtega z Uredbo (ES) št. 619/2008 za razpisno obdobje, ki se zaključi 15. septembra 2009, je najvišji znesek nadomestila za proizvod in namembne kraje iz člena 1(c) in člena 2 navedene uredbe 25,80 EUR/100 kg.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 853/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 853/2009
fixing the maximum buying-in price for skimmed milk powder for the 10th individual invitation to tender within the tendering procedure opened by Regulation (EC) No 310/2009
o določitvi najvišje odkupne cene za posneto mleko v prahu za 10. posamični razpis v okviru razpisnega postopka na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 310/2009
For the 10th individual invitation to tender for the buying-in of skimmed milk powder within the tendering procedure opened by Regulation (EC) No 310/2009, in respect of which the time limit for the submission of tenders expired on 15 September 2009, the maximum buying-in price shall be EUR 167,90/100 kg.
Za 10. posamični razpis za odkup posnetega mleka v prahu v okviru razpisnega postopka za zbiranje ponudb na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 310/2009, katerega rok za vložitev ponudb je pretekel 15. septembra 2009, znaša najvišja odkupna cena 167,90 EUR/100 kg.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 854/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 854/2009
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 614/2009 of 7 July 2009 on the common system of trade for ovalbumin and lactalbumin [2], and in particular Article 3(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 614/2009 z dne 7. julija 2009 o skupnem sistemu trgovine za ovalbumin in laktalbumin [2] ter zlasti člena 3(4) Uredbe,
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 [3] lays down detailed rules for implementing the system of additional import duties and fixes representative prices for poultrymeat and egg products and for egg albumin.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1484/95 [3] navaja podrobna pravila za izvajanje sistema dodatnih uvoznih dajatev in določa reprezentativne cene v sektorjih perutninskega mesa in jajc ter za jajčni albumin.
OJ L 236, 8.9.2009, p. 5.
UL L 236, 8.9.2009, str. 5.
to the Commission Regulation of 17 September 2009 fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 17. septembra 2009 o določitvi reprezentativnih cen v sektorjih perutninskega mesa in jajc ter za jajčni albumin in o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1484/95
Commission Regulation (EC) No 855/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 855/2009
30 July 2009
30. julija 2009
Commission Regulation (EC) No 856/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 856/2009
Rates of the refunds applicable from 18 September 2009 to certain milk products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty [1](EUR/100 kg)
Stopnje nadomestil od 18. septembra 2009 za nekatere mlečne izdelke, izvožene kot blago, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi [1](EUR/100 kg)
The rates set out in this Annex are not applicable to exports to(a) third countries: Andorra, the Holy See (Vatican City State), Liechtenstein, the United States of America and the goods listed in Tables I and II of Protocol 2 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 exported to the Swiss Confederation.(b) territories of EU Member States not forming part of the customs territory of the Community: Ceuta, Melilla, the Communes of Livigno and Campione d’Italia, Heligoland, Greenland, the Faeroe Islands and the areas of the Republic of Cyprus in which the Government of the Republic of Cyprus does not exercise effective control.(c) European territories for whose external relations a Member State is responsible and not forming part of the customs territory of the Community: Gibraltar.(d) the destinations referred to in Article 33(1), Article 41(1) and Article 42(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 612/2009 (OJ L 186, 17.7.2009, p. 1).
Stopnje, določene v tej prilogi, se ne uporabljajo za izvoz(a) v tretje države: Andora, Sveti sedež (Vatikanska mestna država), Lihtenštajn, Združene države Amerike ter za blago iz preglednic I in II Protokola 2 k Sporazumu med Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo z dne 22. julija 1972, izvoženo v Švicarsko konfederacijo;(b) na ozemlje držav članic EU, ki niso del carinskega območja Skupnosti: Ceuta, Melilla, občini Livigno in Campione d'Italia, otok Helgoland, Grenlandija, Ferski otoki in območja Republike Ciper, v katerih vlada Republike Ciper ne izvaja učinkovitega nadzora;(c) na Evropska ozemlja, za zunanje odnose katerih je odgovorna država članica in niso del carinskega območja Skupnosti: Gibraltar;(d) na destinacije iz odstavka 1 člena 33, odstavka 1 člena 41 in odstavka 1 člena 42 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 612/2009 (UL L 186, 17.7.2009, str. 1).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 857/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 857/2009
amending Regulation (EC) No 838/2009 fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 September 2009
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 838/2009 o določitvi uvoznih dajatev v sektorju žit od 16. septembra 2009
The import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 September 2009 were fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 838/2009 [3].
Uvozne dajatve v sektorju žit, ki se uporabljajo od 16. septembra 2009, so bile določene z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 838/2009 [3].