natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The sum to be recovered shall bear interest for the entire period running from the date it was put into effect until the date of its recovery.
Znesku, ki ga je treba vrniti, se pripišejo obresti za celotno obdobje od datuma, ko ga je upravičenec dobil na voljo, do datuma njegovega vračila.
The interest shall be calculated as capitalised interest in conformity with Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Obresti se izračunajo kot obresti, pripisane glavnici, v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004.
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months of the date of its notification.
Združeno kraljestvo Velika Britanija in Severna Irska zagotovi, da se ta odločba izvede v štirih mesecih po tem, ko je bilo o njej obveščeno.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland shall submit the following information to the Commission:
Združeno kraljestvo Velika Britanija in Severna Irska v dveh mesecih po tem, ko je bilo obveščeno o tej odločbi, Komisiji predloži naslednje informacije:
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision; and
podroben opis že sprejetih ali načrtovanih ukrepov za uskladitev s to odločbo in
documentary evidence that the beneficiary has been ordered to repay the aid.
dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da je bilo upravičencu odrejeno, naj vrne pomoč.
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 has been completed.
Združeno kraljestvo Velika Britanija in Severna Irska Komisijo obvešča o napredku v zvezi s sprejetimi nacionalnimi ukrepi za izvajanje te odločbe, dokler se vračanje pomoči iz člena 1 ne konča.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Na jasno zahtevo Komisije takoj predloži informacije o že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepih za uskladitev s to odločbo.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest recovered from the beneficiary.
Predloži tudi podrobne informacije o zneskih pomoči in obrestih za vračilo, ki jih je upravičenec že vrnil.
Done at Brussels, 11 February 2009.
V Bruslju, 11. februarja 2009
OJ C 15, 22.1.2008, p. 8.
UL C 15, 22.1.2008, str. 8.
See Commission Decision of 28 November 2007, paragraphs 42-60.
Glej odločitev Komisije z dne 28. novembra 2007, odstavki 42 do 60.
See http://www.btplc.com/Report/Report08/pdf/AnnualReport2008.pdf
Glej http://www.btplc.com/Report/Report08/pdf/AnnualReport2008.pdf
See http://www.btplc.com/Report/Report08/pdf/AnnualReport2008.pdf.
Glej http://www.btplc.com/Report/Report08/pdf/AnnualReport2008.pdf.
See also, OFCOM Notice under section 155(1) of the Enterprise Act 2002 of 30 June 2005, at http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/sec155/sec155.pdf and Final statements on the strategic review of telecommunications, and undertakings in lieu of a reference under the Enterprise Act 2002, 22 September 2005, at: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/statement_tsr/statement.pdf
Glej tudi Notice under section 155(1) of the Enterprise Act 2002 (obvestilo OFCOM v skladu s členom 155(1) Zakona o družbah iz leta 2002) z dne 30. junija 2005 na spletnem naslovu http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/sec155/sec155.pdf ter Final statements on the Strategic Review of Telecommunications, and undertakings in lieu of a reference under the Enterprise Act 2002 (končno poročilo o strateškem pregledu telekomunikacij in izjave namesto sklicevanja v skladu z Zakonom o družbah iz leta 2002) z dne 22. septembra 2005 na spletnem naslovu: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/statement_tsr/statement.pdf
Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 (now Article 88) of the EC Treaty (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 (zdaj člena 88) Pogodbe ES (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1).
The successor to the statutory corporation British Telecommunications, it was incorporated in England and Wales as a public limited company, wholly owned by the Government of the United Kingdom, as a result of the Telecommunications Act 1984.
Kot naslednica po zakonu ustanovljenega podjetja British Telecommunications je bila na podlagi Zakona o telekomunikacijah iz leta 1984 registrirana v Angliji in Walesu kot delniška družba v celoti v lasti vlade Združenega kraljestva.
Between November 1984 and July 1993, the Government of the United Kingdom sold all of its shareholding in British Telecommunications plc in three public offerings.
Od novembra 1984 do julija 1993 je vlada Združenega kraljestva na treh javnih ponudbah prodala vse svoje deleže v delniški družbi British Telecommunications plc.
The Crown guarantee covered all outstanding liabilities of the corporation transferred to BT in 1984.
Poroštvo države je krilo vse neporavnane obveznosti družbe, ki so bile leta 1984 prenesene na družbo BT.
Although the authorities of the United Kingdom state that they do not have complete information on the total amount of liabilities that were covered other than pension liabilities, they note that the 1983/1984 financial statements of British Telecom provide some information as to the position on 31 March 1984:
Čeprav organi Združenega kraljestva navajajo, da nimajo popolnih informacij o celotnem znesku kritih obveznosti, temveč le o pokojninskih obveznostih, poudarjajo, da računovodski izkazi British Telecom za leti 1983 in 1984 vsebujejo določene informacije o stanju na dan 31. marec 1984:
The authorities of the United Kingdom indicate that they are unable to specify the value of the liabilities that would be covered by the guarantee.
Organi Združenega kraljestva navajajo, da ne morejo natančno navesti vrednosti obveznosti, ki naj bi jih krilo poroštvo.
Indeed, the outstanding liabilities would depend on the number of members to be covered and on the assets of the BT pension scheme if and when BT became insolvent and was wound up.
Neporavnane obveznosti bi bile dejansko odvisne od števila članov, ki naj bi jih krile, ter od sredstev pokojninske sheme družbe BT, če in ko bi družba BT postala plačilno nezmožna in bi bil zanjo opravljen postopek likvidacije.
According to the recovery plan, the scheme should return to full funding by 2015.
V skladu s sanacijskim načrtom se bo popolno kritje sheme doseglo do leta 2015.
BT agreed to pay GBP 280 million per annum for 10 years, which, combined with investment returns, is anticipated to fully pay off the deficit.
Družba BT se je strinjala, da bo deset let plačevala 280 milijonov GBP na leto, kar naj bi skupaj z donosom naložb v celoti pokrilo primanjkljaj.
The Pension Protection Fund was created in April 2005.
Pokojninski zaščitni sklad je bil oblikovan aprila 2005.
Its function is to pay compensation to members of eligible pension schemes whose sponsor employers have suffered insolvency leaving insufficient assets in the scheme to provide their members with protection equivalent to the level of compensation payable by the Pension Protection Fund.
Njegov namen je plačati nadomestilo članom upravičenih pokojninskih shem, katerih sponzorski delodajalci so postali plačilno nezmožni, zaradi česar so v shemi ostala nezadostna sredstva, da bi se njenim članom zagotovila zaščita, enaka ravni nadomestila, ki ga plačuje pokojninski zaščitni sklad.
Finally, part 3 of the Pensions Act 2004 introduced new scheme funding requirements (Statutory funding objectives) which replaced the 1995 minimum funding requirements.
V 3. delu Pokojninskega zakona iz leta 2004 so določeni novi predpisi o financiranju sheme („zakonsko predpisano financiranje“), ki so zamenjali predpise o minimalnem financiranju iz leta 1995.
Section 222 of the Act provides that schemes are subject to a requirement to hold sufficient and appropriate assets to cover their technical provisions.
V členu 222 navedenega zakona je določeno, da morajo imeti sheme zadostna in ustrezna sredstva za kritje svojih tehničnih rezervacij.
The authorities of the United Kingdom further underlined that this mandatory funding requirement has been fully respected by the BTPS, as illustrated by the statements prepared by the BTPS trustees indicating that the 2004 funding requirement had been fully applied in respect of the recovery plan associated with the 2005 valuation.
Organi Združenega kraljestva so poudarili tudi, da je BTPS v celoti upošteval predpise o financiranju, kot je razvidno iz izkazov, ki so jih pripravili skrbniki BTPS in ki kažejo, da so se predpisi o financiranju iz leta 2004 v celoti upoštevali v sanacijskem načrtu v zvezi z oceno iz leta 2005.
The authorities of the United Kingdom also indicated that the pensions regulator was satisfied that the guarantee was not used to extend the recovery period or affect the key assumptions in the actuarial valuation or recovery plan.
Organi Združenega kraljestva so navedli tudi, da je zakonodajalec na področju pokojnin ugotovil, da se poroštvo ni uporabilo za podaljšanje sanacijskega obdobja ali vplivanje na glavne domneve v aktuarski oceni ali sanacijskem načrtu.
It argues that these two measures (Crown guarantee and the resulting exemption from the Pension Protection Fund levy) are intrinsically linked to the 1984 pension package.
Po njegovih trditvah sta ta dva ukrepa (poroštvo države in posledično izvzetje od plačila dajatve za pokojninski zaščitni sklad) dejansko povezana s pokojninskim paketom iz leta 1984.
This package has imposed a considerable financial burden on BT.
Ta paket je družbi BT naložil precejšnje finančno breme.
They always state that the investment policy of BTPS had regard to the minimum funding requirements laid down in the Pensions Act 1995.
V teh je vedno navedeno, da se pri naložbeni politiki BTPS upoštevajo predpisi o minimalnem financiranju iz Pokojninskega zakona iz leta 1995.
The authorities of the United Kingdom claim that, in effect, BT funded BTPS as if the minimum funding requirements laid down in the Pensions Act 1995 and the Pensions Act 2004 fully applied to it.
Organi Združenega kraljestva trdijo, da je družba BT dejansko financirala BTPS, kot če bi zanjo v celoti veljali predpisi o minimalnem financiranju iz Pokojninskega zakona iz leta 1995 in Pokojninskega zakona iz leta 2004.
The allegation by BT and BTPS that the creation of the obligation to contribute is exogenous to the Crown guarantee disregards the fact that the nature of the benefit and the beneficiary are not the same in 1984 and in 2004.
Družba BT in BTPS v svoji trditvi, da se obveznost plačevanja prispevkov uvede, kadar ni poroštva države, ne upoštevata dejstva, da narava koristi in upravičenec nista bila enaka v letih 1984 in 2004.
The coverage of pension rights in case of BT insolvency is a benefit for pre-privatisation employees in that it guarantees the payment of the rights which accrue to them.
Kritje pokojninskih pravic ob plačilni nezmožnosti družbe BT pomeni korist za zaposlene pred privatizacijo, saj jim zagotavlja plačilo pridobljenih pravic.
The Commission also rejects the argument that no advantage is present on the grounds that this guarantee has already been paid by BT’s shareholders in the overall price that they paid for the company in 1984.
Komisija se tudi ne strinja s trditvijo, da prednosti ni, ker so to poroštvo že plačali delničarji družbe BT v celotni ceni, ki so jo plačali za družbo leta 1984.
As explained in the decision of 28 November 2007, the Commission concluded on the basis of the information available that the Crown guarantee in itself, as far as it covers BT’s pension liabilities, did not confer any advantage to BT at the time it was granted and there is therefore no reason to assume that BT’s shareholders paid a premium for an advantage for certain employees that would only materialise in the event of BT’s insolvency.
Kot je razloženo v odločitvi z dne 28. novembra 2007, je Komisija na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij sklenila, da samo poroštvo države, če krije pokojninske obveznosti družbe BT, družbi BT ni prineslo nobene prednosti v času, ko je bilo dodeljeno, zato ni razloga, da se domneva, da so delničarji družbe BT plačali premijo za prednost, ki bi jo imeli nekateri zaposleni in ki bi se uresničila le ob plačilni nezmožnosti družbe BT.
relating to State aid C 29/04 (ex N 328/03) that Italy is considering granting to the Villasor sugar refinery owned by Sadam ISZ
o državni pomoči C 29/04 (ex N 328/03), ki jo Italija namerava odobriti sladkorni rafineriji iz Villasorja v lasti družbe Sadam ISZ
having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community and, in particular, Article 88(2)(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 88(2) Pogodbe,
having given interested parties notice to submit their comments pursuant to that Article, and having regard to those comments,
po pozivu zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z zgoraj navedeno določbo, in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
By letter dated 22 July 2003, Italy notified the Commission of the aid to the Villasor sugar refinery owned by Sadam ISZ.
Italija je z dopisom z dne 22. julija 2003 Komisiji priglasila pomoč v korist sladkorne rafinerije iz Villasorja v lasti družbe Sadam ISZ.
By letters dated 19 September 2003 and 30 March 2004, Italy submitted the additional information to the Commission.
Italija je z dopisoma z dne 19. septembra 2003 in 30. marca 2004 Komisiji poslala dodatne informacije.
By letter dated 8 September 2004, the Commission informed Italy of its decision to initiate the procedure referred to in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid in question.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 8. septembra 2004 obvestila Italijo o odločitvi, da bo sprožila postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe proti zadevni pomoči.
By letters dated 13 October 2004 and 7 April 2005, Italy forwarded to the Commission the Italian authorities’ comments concerning the decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure.
Italija je z dopisoma z dne 13. oktobra 2004 in 7. aprila 2005 Komisiji poslala pripombe italijanskih organov glede odločitve o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave.
The Commission called on interested parties to submit their comments on the aid in question.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane stranke, naj predložijo pripombe glede zadevne pomoči.
The Commission received comments on this subject from interested parties.
Komisija je od zainteresiranih strank prejela zadevne pripombe.
It forwarded them to Italy, giving it the opportunity to comment on them, and received Italy’s comments by letter dated 18 May 2005.
Posredovala jih je Italiji in ji dala možnost odgovora nanje, Italija pa je odgovorila z dopisom z dne 18. maja 2005.
By letters dated 31 January 2008 and 14 April 2008, the Italian authorities forwarded to the Commission the information requested by letter dated 29 March 2007.
Italijanski organi so z dopisoma z dne 31. januarja 2008 in 14. aprila 2008 Komisiji poslali informacije, ki jih je zahtevala z dopisom z dne 29. marca 2007.
The recipient firm — the Villasor sugar refinery owned by Sadam ISZ — is a sugar beet processing facility. It is the only one in Sardinia (one of the largest islands in the Mediterranean).
Upravičeno podjetje, sladkorna rafinerija iz Villasorja, ki je v lasti družbe Sadam ISZ, je edini obrat za predelavo sladkorne pese na ozemlju Sardinije (eden od največjih otokov v Sredozemlju).
The Italian authorities are making EUR 3,5 million available to the refinery in order partially to compensate it for the losses it sustained following the slump in sugar production caused by the fall in sugar beet supplies following the drought in 2001-2002.
Italijanski organi tej rafineriji dajejo na razpolago 3,5 milijona EUR za delno nadomestilo izgub, utrpelih zaradi padca proizvodnje sladkorja, ki ga je povzročilo zmanjšanje dobave pese zaradi suše v letih 2001 in 2002.
Regarding sugar beet production, the competent authorities provided data showing a decrease in regional production and, consequently, of sugar beet supplies.
Kar zadeva pridelavo pese, so pristojni organi predložili podatke, ki kažejo zmanjšanje regionalne pridelave in posledično dobav rafineriji.
Compared with the 1998-2000 reference period, the fall was 39 % in 2001 and 68 % in 2002 [2].
Pridelava se je v primerjavi z referenčnim obdobjem 1998–2000 leta 2001 zmanjšala za 39 %, leta 2002 pa za 68 % [2].
The competent authorities calculated the loss sustained by the Villasor refinery on the basis of the data extracted from the company’s balance sheets for the financial years 1998 to 2002 and estimated it at EUR 6858448 [3]. The method for calculating the loss was as follows.
Pristojni organi so škodo, ki jo je utrpela rafinerija iz Villasorja, izračunali na podlagi izvlečkov iz bilanc družbe za poslovna leta od 1998 do 2002 in jo ocenili na 6858448 EUR [3].
The authorities calculated the proportion of the fixed costs in relation to one tonne of sugar during one reference period (1998-2000) and compared this figure to the ratio of fixed costs per tonne of sugar during the years 2001 and 2002.
Metoda izračuna škode je naslednja: organi so izračunali delež fiksnih stroškov na tono sladkorja v referenčnem obdobju (1998–2000) in to številko primerjali z razmerjem fiksnih stroškov na tono sladkorja v letih 2001 in 2002.
For 2001-2002, the same calculation process gave rise to the following results: the effect of fixed costs on the product in 2001 was EUR 287,95/tonne [6] and, in 2002, EUR 569,18/tonne [7].
Isti postopek izračuna za leti 2001 in 2002 privede do naslednjih rezultatov: fiksni stroški na proizvod so leta 2001 znašali 287,95 EUR/t [6], leta 2002 pa 569,18 EUR/t [7].
The major effect of the fixed costs in relation to the reference period was obtained by subtracting the effect of the fixed costs for the reference period from the effect of the fixed costs for 2001 and 2002.
Večji vpliv fiksnih stroškov v primerjavi z referenčnim obdobjem je bil izračunan tako, da se je vpliv fiksnih stroškov za referenčno obdobje odštel od vpliva fiksnih stroškov za leti 2001 in 2002.
The result in 2001 was EUR 121,34/tonne and, in 2002, EUR 402,58/tonne [8].
Rezultat je 121,34 EUR/t za leto 2001 in 402,58 EUR/t za leto 2002 [8].
In order to calculate the total loss sustained, total sugar production in 2001 and 2002 was multiplied by the index shown above.
Za izračun skupne utrpele škode je bila skupna proizvodnja sladkorja v letih 2001 in 2002 pomnožena z zgoraj opredeljenim indeksom.
In 2001, the loss was quantified at EUR 2427278 and, in 2002, at EUR 4431170 [9], i.e. a total of EUR 6858448.
Leta 2001 je bila škoda ocenjena na 2427278 EUR, leta 2002 pa na 4431170 EUR [9], kar je skupaj 6858448 EUR.
The amount of EUR 3,5 million granted by the Italian authorities would therefore correspond to 51 % of the loss sustained.
Znesek 3,5 milijona, ki so ga dodelili italijanski organi, naj bi torej ustrezal 51 % utrpele škode.
The Italian authorities explained that the amount of the aid was dictated by budgetary imperatives.
Italijanski organi so pojasnili, da znesek pomoči opredeljujejo proračunske omejitve.
This aid is not to be paid in conjunction with other forms of aid.
Te pomoči ni mogoče kumulirati z drugimi pomočmi.
In order to demonstrate the exceptional nature of the drought affecting Sardinia in 2001-2002, the Italian authorities submitted a dossier, drawn up by Sardinia’s Regional Agro-Meteorological Service (Italian acronym: SAR) [10]. These data indicate, for example, the duration of the drought and the level of water reserves.
Italijanski organi so predložili dokument s povzetimi vremenskimi podatki za zadnjih 10 let, ki ga je za Sardinijo pripravila Service Agrométéorologique Régional (SAR) [10], da bi dokazali izjemno naravo suše, ki je prizadela otok v letih 2001 in 2002.
There are also data concerning the agro-climatological situation in Sardinia in 2001-2002.
Iz teh podatkov med drugim izhajajo trajanje suše, raven vodnih rezerv in podatki o agro-podnebnih razmerah na Sardiniji v letih 2001 in 2002.
The Italian authorities also indicated that sugar beet growing had benefited from aid on a number of occasions.
Italijanski organi so poleg tega navedli, da je bila pomoč za gojenje pese že večkrat odobrena.
During the period 1990-2002, aid had been granted in 1995, 2000, 2001 and 2002.
V obdobju 1990–2002 je bila pomoč dodeljena v letih 1995, 2000, 2001 in 2002.
The Italian authorities considered the aid to be compatible with the common market under the terms of point 11.3.1 of the Community Guidelines for State aid in the agriculture sector for the period 2000-2006 (henceforth referred to as the Guidelines) [11] since, in their view, such aid is designed to make good the loss sustained by the sugar refinery following a decrease in sugar beet production caused by an adverse weather condition assimilated to a natural disaster.
Italijanski organi so menili, da je pomoč združljiva s skupnim trgom v skladu s točko 11.3.1 Smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči v kmetijskem sektorju za obdobje 2000–2006 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Smernice) [11], ker je po njihovem mnenju namenjena povrnitvi škode, ki jo je sladkorna rafinerija utrpela zaradi zmanjšanja pridelave pese, ki ga je povzročil vremenski pojav, enak naravni nesreči.
The Italian authorities considered that this interpretation was in line with Commission practice in such matters [12] in cases where primary agricultural production and the procedures of agricultural processing were closely interdependent, and particularly in an instance where the agricultural processing undertaking concerned had no alternative sources of supply available to it.
Italijanski organi so menili, da je ta razlaga v skladu s prakso Komisije na tem področju [12], kadar obstaja tesna medsebojna odvisnost med osnovno kmetijsko pridelavo in postopkom agro-industrijske predelave in zlasti če zadevno agro-industrijsko podjetje nima alternativnih virov za oskrbo.
It also has to be transported to the processing facility quickly (within 36 hours of being harvested), otherwise it loses its sugar content and is attacked by fungi, making it unusable.
Italijanski organi trdijo, da je treba peso, ki se prideluje v Sredozemlju, zaradi njenih fizioloških lastnosti pobrati v kratkem razdobju, ko je vsebnost sladkorja najvišja, in jo je treba hitro (v 36 urah po spravilu) prepeljati v predelovalni obrat, sicer lahko izgubi vsebnost sladkorja in jo napadejo glive, zaradi česar postane neuporabna.
For these reasons, supply basins are usually situated within a radius of 80 to 100 kilometres from processing facilities, and harvesting and processing periods are very short.
Bazeni za oskrbo so zato običajno v radiju 80/100 km od predelovalnih obratov, čas za spravilo in predelavo pa je zelo kratek.
The source of supply closest to the Villasor refinery is in continental Italy, more than 250 km away (including 180 km across the sea).
Najbližji vir za oskrbo rafinerije iz Villasorja je v celinski Italiji, oddaljen več kot 250 km (od tega 180 km po morju).
The Italian authorities pointed out that sugar production is regulated at Community level by the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (sugar CMO Regulation) [13]. This stipulates that, in order to benefit from prices and revenues guaranteed by the CMO, refineries must enter into contracts with their supply basin’s sugar beet producers for the ‘A + B’ sugar production quotas granted to them by the State.
Italijanski organi so opozorili, da je proizvodnja sladkorja na ravni Skupnosti urejena s skupno ureditvijo trgov za sladkor (Uredba o skupni ureditvi trgov (SUT) za sladkor) [13], s katero je določeno, da morajo rafinerije skleniti pogodbe s pridelovalci pese iz svojega bazena za oskrbo za proizvodne kvote sladkorja „A + B“, ki jim jih dodeli država, da bi lahko izkoriščali cene in prihodke, ki jih zagotavlja SUT.