natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poland submitted information on the progress of the negotiations with Amber by letters of 7 April 2008, registered on 18 April 2008, 23 April 2008, registered on the same day, 25 April 2008, registered on the same day, 28 April 2008, registered on 29 April 2008 and 29 April 2008, registered on 5 May 2008.
Poljska je informacije o napredku pogajanj z Amberjem predložila z dopisi z dne 7. aprila 2008, evidentiranim 18. aprila 2008, z dne 23. aprila 2008, evidentiranim istega dne, z dne 25. aprila 2008, evidentiranim istega dne, z dne 28. aprila 2008, evidentiranim 29. aprila 2008, in z dne 29. aprila 2008, evidentiranim 5. maja 2008.
The Commission requested information by letter of 30 April 2008.
Komisija je zaprosila za informacije z dopisom z dne 30. prila 2008.
Poland also informed the Commission that the Polish authorities were taking action to relaunch the privatisation process with a view to signing privatisation agreements by the end of November 2008.
Poljska je Komisijo obvestila, da nameravajo poljski organi ponovno začeti postopek privatizacije z namenom podpisa privatizacijskih sporazumov do konca novembra 2008.
Starting on 3 June 2008, Poland submitted daily reports to the Commission on the actions taken by interested parties in the relaunched privatisation process.
Od 3. junija 2008 je Poljska Komisiji pošiljala dnevna poročila o ukrepih, ki so jih različne zainteresirane stranke sprejele v ponovnem postopku privatizacije.
Poland submitted additional information concerning State aid granted to the yard by letter of 9 January 2008, registered on 10 January 2008.
Poljska je z dopisom z dne 9. januarja 2008, evidentiranim 10. januarja 2008, predložila dodatne informacije v zvezi z državno pomočjo, dodeljeno ladjedelnici.
Poland informed the Commission about additional measures granted to SSN by letters of 6 December 2007, registered on the same day, 9 January 2008, registered on 10 January 2008, 12 February 2008, registered on 13 February 2008, 26 June 2008, registered on 27 June 2008 and 12 September 2008, registered on the same day.
Poljska je Komisijo obvestila o dodatnih ukrepih za SSN, in sicer z dopisi z dne 6. decembra 2007, evidentiranim istega dne, z dne 9. januarja 2008, evidentiranim 10. januarja 2008, z dne 12. februarja 2008, evidentiranim 13. februarja 2008, z dne 26. junija 2008, evidentiranim 27. junija 2008, in z dne 12. septembra 2008, evidentiranim istega dne.
SSN was created on 25 June 2002 to take over the shipbuilding activities of Stocznia Szczecińska Porta Holding SA (hereinafter SSPH) and its main shipbuilding subsidiary Stocznia Szczecińska (hereinafter SS), which were declared bankrupt on 29 July 2002.
SSN je bila ustanovljena 25. junija 2002, da bi prevzela ladjedelniške dejavnosti ladjedelnice Stocznia Szczecińska Porta Holding S.A.(v nadaljnjem besedilu: SSPH) in njene glavne ladjedelniške hčerinske družbe Stocznia Szczecińska (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SS), ki sta 29. julija 2002 razglasili stečaj.
SSN was established as an empty shell, free of the debts of SSPH and SS relating to their former activity.
SSN je bila ustanovljena kot „prazna lupina“ (empty shell), brez dolgov SSPH in SS v zvezi z njunimi nekdanjimi dejavnostmi.
At that time SSN did not take over the assets of SSPH and SS, but leased them instead from the receiver in bankruptcy until July 2004.
V tistem času SSN ni prevzela sredstev SSPH in SS, temveč jih je od stečajnega upravitelja najela do julija 2004.
On 20 July 2004 SSN signed agreements with the receivers of SSPH and SS under which it acquired these assets.
julija 2004 je SSN podpisala pogodbe z upraviteljema SSPH in SS, s katerimi je pridobila ta sredstva.
ASS took over the employees of SSPH and SS, but the yard gradually reduced its workforce from 8071 in 2001 to 5322 at the end of 2006.
ASS je prevzela zaposlene SSPH in SS, vendar je ladjedelnica postopoma zmanjšala število zaposlenih z 8071 v letu 2001 na 5322 konec leta 2006.
In 2007 there were 4700 employees on average.
Leta 2007 je v povprečju zaposlovala 4700 delavcev.
It drew up the 2003 restructuring plan, which was first approved by its shareholders on 19 December 2002 and later modified in October 2003.
Pripravila je načrt za prestrukturiranje 2003, ki so ga delničarji 19. decembra 2002 odobrili, oktobra 2003 pa spremenili.
The following factors were identified as the main reasons for the bankruptcy of the former shipbuilder in Szczecin: technological problems, design errors, low productivity, high costs and external factors such as the high exchange rate of the Polish zloty and Asian competition.
Kot glavni razlogi za stečaj prejšnje ladjedelnice v Ščečinu (Szczecinu) so bili navedeni naslednji dejavniki: tehnološki problemi, napake pri zasnovi, nizka storilnost, visoki stroški in zunanji dejavniki, kot sta visok menjalni tečaj poljskega zlota in konkurenca iz Azije.
These guarantees relate to ships contracted in 2002.
Te garancije se nanašajo na ladje, za katere so bile pogodbe podpisane leta 2002.
The guarantees for the subsequent ships were to be issued as soon as the previous ships were delivered.
Garancije za naslednje ladje naj bi se izdale takoj po dobavi predhodnih ladij.
The Polish authorities referred to the rollover system, under which a new guarantee is extended when a previous guarantee expires, and argued that this system, and thus all guarantees covered by it, had been approved by the Supervisory Board as part of the 2003 restructuring plan.
Poljski organi so se sklicevali na sistem obnovitve, po katerem se novo jamstvo podaljša, ko poteče prejšnje jamstvo, in navedli, da je ta sistem in s tem vsa jamstva, ki jih sistem zajema, odobril nadzorni svet kot del načrta za prestrukturiranje 2003.
They cited the criteria for assessing whether a guarantee was applicable after accession and considered these criteria to be decisive in determining whether the aid was granted.
Navedli so merila za oceno, ali je jamstvo veljavno tudi po pristopu, in izrazili mnenje, da so ta merila odločilna pri določitvi, ali je bila pomoč dodeljena.
Nevertheless, Poland acknowledged that the yard really did need substantial modernisation investment of at least PLN 200 million and would therefore be sold to a private investor in 2008-2009.
Kljub temu pa je Poljska priznala, da ladjedelnica resnično potrebuje precejšnjo naložbo za posodobitev v višini najmanj 200 milijonov PLN in bo zato v letu 2008–2009 prodana zasebnemu vlagatelju.
At the meeting, the Polish authorities confirmed that a new restructuring plan or a revised version of the 2003 restructuring plan would be submitted to the Commission.
Na sestanku so poljski organi potrdili, da bodo Komisiji predložili nov načrt za prestrukturiranje oziroma spremenjeno različico načrta na prestrukturiranje 2003.
The Polish authorities then confirmed the undertaking to privatise the yard by 30 June 2007 in a letter of 5 January 2007.
Poljski organi so zavezo k privatizaciji ladjedelnice do 30. junija 2007 potrdili v dopisu z dne 5. januarja 2007.
While the privatisation documents were being drawn up, Poland asked the Commission to indicate what compensatory measures it considered necessary for SSN so that potential investors could be informed accordingly.
Med pripravljanjem dokumentov za privatizacijo je Poljska Komisijo zaprosila za navedbo izravnalnih ukrepov, ki se ji zdijo potrebni za SSN, tako da lahko o njih ustrezno obvestijo potencialne investitorje.
Instead Poland undertook to commence negotiations with selected investors as of January 2008.
Poljska se je zavezala, da bo januarja 2008 začela pogajanja z izbranimi vlagatelji.
The Commission reiterated its concern about the delays by letter of 30 November 2007 and specified that it expected the new owner of SSN to submit the first draft of a new restructuring plan by the end of February 2008.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 30. novembra 2008 ponovila zaskrbljenost v zvezi z zamudami in navedla, da od novega lastnika SSN pričakuje, da bo do konca februarja 2008 predložil prvi osnutek novega načrta za prestrukturiranje.
This request was then repeated by the Commission on numerous occasions.
To zahtevo je Komisija nato še večkrat ponovila.
The Commission repeatedly insisted on strict adherence to the privatisation schedule.
Komisija je večkrat vztrajala pri strogem upoštevanju časovnega okvira privatizacije.
Amber submitted updated financial projections by e-mail of 9 April 2008.
Amber je z elektronsko pošto z dne 9. aprila 2008 posredoval posodobljene finančne napovedi.
The Commission provided oral comments on this draft at a meeting in Warsaw on 10 April 2008 between Commission staff, the Polish authorities, the yard and Amber, and sent written comments in a letter of 21 April 2008.
Komisija je v zvezi s tem osnutkom podala svoje ustne pripombe na sestanku v Varšavi 10. aprila 2008 med osebjem Komisije, poljskimi organi, ladjedelnico in Amberjem, z dopisom z dne 21. aprila 2008 pa je posredovala tudi pripombe v pisni obliki.
The amended restructuring plan covered the period 2006-2011.
Spremenjeni načrt za prestrukturiranje je zajemal obdobje med letoma 2006 in 2011.
It had been drawn up in cooperation with the consultancy firm Deloitte and its objective was to complete the restructuring that had started in 2002 on the basis of a plan submitted to the Commission in October 2005, which had been deemed insufficient to restore the undertaking’s viability.
Pripravljen je bil v sodelovanju s svetovalnim podjetjem Deloitte, njegov cilj pa je bil dokončati prestrukturiranje, ki se je začelo leta 2002 na podlagi načrta, ki je bil Komisiji predložen oktobra 2005 in ki je bil ocenjen kot nezadosten za obnovitev sposobnosti preživetja podjetja.
The reduction of the workforce would result in an increase of productivity from 34 CGT/employee in 2003 to 49,3 CGT/employee in 2011.
Z zmanjšanjem števila zaposlenih naj bi se storilnost povečala s 34 KBT na zaposlenega v letu 2003 na 49,3 KBT na zaposlenega v letu 2011.
In terms of man hours/CGT, productivity in 2003 had been 47.
Leta 2003 je bila storilnost 47 delovnih ur na KBT.
The plan referred to financing in the form of additional State Treasury guarantees on loans of USD 35 million for 2006 and 2007 and USD 25 million for 2008 and 2009.
Načrt je navajal financiranje v obliki dodatnih jamstev finančnega ministrstva za posojila v višini 35 milijonov USD za leto 2006 in 2007 ter 25 milijonov USD za leti 2008 in 2009.
It also envisaged replacing KUKE guarantees with guarantees obtained on the market and obtaining commercial loans.
Predvideval je tudi nadomestitev garancij KUKE z garancijami, pridobljenimi na trgu, in pridobitev komercialnih posojil.
The plan assumed restructuring costs of PLN 374,7 million and operational costs during the restructuring period of PLN 11120 million.
Načrt je predvideval stroške za prestrukturiranje v višini 374,7 milijona PLN in stroške poslovanja med obdobjem prestrukturiranja v višini 11120 milijonov PLN.
Both these figures were for the period 2002-2009.
Ti zneski veljajo za obdobje 2002–2009.
The plan envisaged investment of PLN 264 million in 2008-2012 and additional investment of PLN 90 million in 2013-2018.
Načrt je predvideval naložbe v višini 264 milijonov PLN v obdobju 2008–2012 in dodatne naložbe v višini 90 milijonov PLN v obdobju 2013–2018.
The plan listed the investments and estimated savings in terms of man hours and operating costs.
Načrt je navajal naložbe in ocenjene prihranke pri delovnih urah in stroških poslovanja.
This included the capital injection of PLN 145 million by ARP decided upon in June 2008.
To je vključevalo dokapitalizacijo v višini 145 milijonov PLN s strani ARP, o kateri je bila sprejeta odločitev junija 2008.
In addition, the plan envisaged obtaining a loan of USD 32 million (PLN 68 million) from ARP.
Poleg tega je načrt predvideval pridobitev posojila v višini 32 milijonov USD (68 milijonov PLN) od ARP.
The investor had stated that it was willing to inject capital of PLN 149,5 million to finance part of the investment programme for 2008-2012.
Vlagatelj je navedel, da je pripravljen vložiti 149,5 milijona PLN za financiranje dela investicijskega programa za obdobje 2008–2012.
The remaining part of the investment programme for this period was to be financed from the yard’s cash flow.
Preostali del investicijskega programa za to obdobje naj bi se financiral iz denarnega toka ladjedelnice.
Finally, the plan presented financial projections for the restructuring period 2008-2012, showing a return to profitability as of 2010.
V načrtu so bile predstavljene tudi finančne napovedi za obdobje prestrukturiranja 2008–2012 in nakazana dobičkonosnost od leta 2010.
The plan listed, in a general manner and unsupported by evidence, a series of assumptions on the basis of which the financial projections had been elaborated, but did not contain the financial model used to arrive at the estimates.
V načrtu je bil na splošno in brez dokazov naveden niz predpostavk, na podlagi katerih so bile napovedi izdelane, vendar ni vseboval finančnega modela, s pomočjo katerega so nastale ocene.
The restructuring plan of 12 September 2008 was based on assumptions similar to those of the plan of June 2008.
Načrt za prestrukturiranje z 12. septembra 2008 je temeljil na predpostavkah, podobnih tistim v načrtu iz junija 2008.
Diversification of activities remained the most important strategic idea and the success of the restructuring was to be achieved through cooperation between Mostostal and Ulstein, combining their experience in the steel construction and shipbuilding sectors.
Razvejanost dejavnosti je ostala najpomembnejša strateška zamisel, prestrukturiranje pa naj bi bilo uspešno zaradi sodelovanja med Mostostalom in Ulsteinom, z združevanjem njunih izkušenj v sektorjih jeklenih konstrukcij in ladjedelništva.
The reasons for Mostostal investing in the Szczecin shipyard remained the same as in the restructuring plan of June 2008.
Razlog za naložbe Mostostala v ladjedelnico Szczecin je ostal enak kot v načrtu za prestrukturiranje iz junija 2008.
The investor’s aim was to expand its capacity in the production of steel structures and to obtain direct access to water transport, which would decrease its transport costs by allowing the transport of bigger fully assembled structures.
Cilj vlagatelja je bil razširiti zmogljivosti pri proizvodnji jeklenih struktur in pridobiti neposredni dostop do vodnega transporta, kar bi zmanjšalo njegove stroške prevoza, saj bi omogočalo prevoz večjih, v celoti sestavljenih struktur.
The financial projections showed that SSN Ulstein would start activity in 2009 and start to make a profit in 2010.
Finančne napovedi so pokazale, da naj bi SSN Ulstein začel delovati leta 2009, leta 2010 pa naj bi že imel dobičke.
SSN Mostostal and SSN Wspólna were supposed to start operating in 2009 and begin making a profit at once.
SSN Mostostal in SSN Wspólna naj bi začela delovati leta 2009 in takoj ustvarjati dobičke.
SSN Mostostal assumed a return on sales of 6-9 % in 2009-2011 and 11 % in 2012.
SSN Mostostal je v letih 2009 do 2011 predvideval donosnost prodaje v višini med 6 in 9 % in leta 2012 v višini 11 %.
The return on sales for SSN Wspólna and SSN Biuro Projektowe would be marginal: 0,4 % in the whole period for SSN Wspólna and 1,6 % for SSN Biuro Projektowe.
Donosnost prodaje za SSN Wspólna in SSN Biuro Projektowe naj bi bila majhna: 0,4 % za celotno obdobje za SSN Wspólna in 1,6 % za SSN Biuro Projektowe.
Table 3 below shows the measures granted between 1 May 2004, the date of Poland’s accession to the EU, and 30 June 2007.
Spodnja preglednica 3 prikazuje ukrepe, dodeljene med 1. majem 2004, datumom pristopa Poljske k EU, in 30. junijem 2007.
Poland notified these measures by letter of 11 July 2007.
Poljska je te ukrepe priglasila z dopisom z dne 11. julija 2007.
Their nominal value is PLN 259560990.
Njihova nominalna vrednost je 259560990 PLN.
Its primary role was to serve as a vehicle for the consolidation of the three major shipyards in Poland, but this project was abandoned in 2006.
Njegova glavna naloga je bila služiti kot mehanizem za konsolidacijo treh največjih ladjedelnic na Poljskem, vendar je bil ta projekt leta 2006 opuščen.
According to the information provided by Poland in 2006 [14], KPS was to be financed by a capital injection from ARP, a contribution in kind (shares in third companies) provided by ARP and a revolving bank loan guaranteed by ARP, which was specifically designed to support the financing of shipyards.
V skladu z informacijami, ki jih je Poljska predložila leta 2006 [14], naj bi se KPS financiral z dokapitalizacijo s strani ARP, s prispevkom v naravi (delnice v treh podjetjih) s strani agencije in z obnovljivim („revolving“) bančnim posojilom, ki ga je jamčila ARP in je bil posebej določen kot finančna pomoč za ladjedelnice.
Table 4 shows the support provided by ARP and KPS between 30 June 2007 and 15 February 2008 and notified to the Commission after 11 July 2007, by letters of 6 December 2007 and 12 February 2008.
Preglednica 4 prikazuje podporo, ki sta jo ARP in KPS zagotovila med 30. junijem 2007 in 15. februarjem 2008 in ki je bila Komisiji priglašena po 11. juliju 2007, z dopisoma z dne 6. decembra 2007 in 12. februarja 2008.
It also shows additional loans from ARP and KPS about which the Commission learned from the SSN Information Memorandum of June 2008 [16], the restructuring plan of Mostostal submitted in June 2008 [17] and the restructuring plan submitted in September 2008.
Prikazuje tudi dodatna posojila ARP in KPS, o katerih je Komisija izvedela iz informacijskega memoranduma SSN iz junija 2008 [16], načrta za prestrukturiranje Mostostala, predloženega junija 2008 [17], in načrta za prestrukturiranje, predloženega septembra 2008.
The nominal value of these measures is PLN 417531254.
Nominalna vrednost teh ukrepov znaša 417531254 PLN.
Table 5 shows unenforced public-law liabilities in the form of real estate tax arrears of PLN 12402000 for the period from July 2003 to December 2004.
Preglednica 5 prikazuje neizvršene obveznosti po javnem pravu v obliki dolgov za davek na nepremičnine v višini 12402000 PLN za obdobje od julija 2003 do decembra 2004.
This measure corresponds to measures 64-68 in part B of the Annex to the decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure.
Ta ukrep ustreza ukrepom 64 do 68 v delu B priloge k odločitvi o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave.
In its submission of 11 July 2007 Poland informed the Commission that KUKE would continue to grant guarantees to SSN in the period up to the end of 2008.
V dopisu z dne 11. julija 2007 je Poljska Komisijo obvestila, da bo KUKE SSN garancije nudila še do konca leta 2008.
According to the restructuring plan submitted on 12 September 2008, another ten KUKE guarantees had been granted to SSN for a total amount of PLN 429578282 on 26 June.
Kot je navedeno v načrtu za prestrukturiranje, predloženem 12. septembra 2008, je bila 26. junija SSN dodeljena še ena garancija KUKE v skupni vrednosti 429578282 PLN.
Act of 15.9.2000 Commercial Companies Code (Dz.U. No 94, 1037 as amended)
Zakon z dne 15.9.2000, Zakon o gospodarskih družbah (Uradni list št. 94, 1037, kakor je bil spremenjen)
Act of 23.4.1964 Civil code (Dz.U. No 16, 93 as amended)
Zakon z dne 23.4.1964, Civilni zakonik (Uradni list št. 16, 93, kakor je bil spremenjen)
Act of 23.4.1964 Civil Code (Dz.U. No 16, 93 as amended)
Zakon z dne 23.4.1964, Civilni zakonik (Uradni list št. 16, 93, kakor je bil spremenjen)
In the present case, some of the measures were notified to the Commission under the ‘interim mechanism’ provided for in point 3 of Annex IV to the Accession Treaty on 29 April 2004, when the 1999 Guidelines were in force.
V tem primeru so bili nekateri ukrepi Komisiji priglašeni 29. aprila 2004 po „začasnem mehanizmu“ v skladu s točko 3 Priloge IV k Pristopni pogodbi, ko so veljale Smernice iz leta 1999.
However, the Guidelines stipulate that they will apply for the assessment of any rescue or restructuring aid granted without the authorisation of the Commission (unlawful aid) if some or all of the aid is granted after 1 October 2004 (point 104, first subparagraph).
Vendar pa je v Smernicah predvideno, da se te uporabljajo pri ocenjevanju vseh pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje, dodeljenih brez dovoljenja Komisije (nezakonita pomoč), če je bil del ali celoten obseg pomoči odobren po 1. oktobru 2004 (točka 104, prvi pododstavek).
In particular, the Commission has assessed the restructuring plan of June 2008 drawn up by Mostostal, also bearing in mind Mostostal’s presentation of the plan at the meeting of 24 June 2008.
Komisija je zlasti ocenila načrt za prestrukturiranje iz junija 2008, ki ga je pripravil Mostostal, tudi ob upoštevanju predstavitve načrta Mostostala na sestanku 24. junija 2008.
The Commission notes that in many respects this restructuring plan was only an outline serving as a basis for further analytical work to be undertaken by the investor.
Komisija upošteva, da je bil ta načrt z več vidikov samo oris, ki je služil kot podlaga za nadaljnje analitično delo, ki naj bi ga prevzel vlagatelj.
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission considers that the yard’s ability to restore its viability on the basis of the restructuring plan of 12 September 2008 has not been shown.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega Komisija meni, da zmožnost ladjedelnice, da obnovi sposobnost preživetja z načrtom za prestrukturiranje z 12. septembra 2008, ni bila dokazana.
Furthermore, the Commission notes that Ulstein has withdrawn from the SSN privatisation process, which means that the restructuring plan of 12 September cannot be implemented under the conditions assumed in the plan.
Poleg tega Komisija opaža, da se je Ulstein umaknil iz postopka privatizacije SSN, kar pomeni, da načrta za prestrukturiranje z 12. septembra ni mogoče izvesti pod pogoji, navedenimi v načrtu.
In addition, the Commission has to take into account the whole restructuring period, which began in 2002.
Poleg tega mora Komisija upoštevati celotno obdobje prestrukturiranja, ki se je začelo leta 2002.
Considering the substantial State aid from which the yard benefited in this period, the own contribution is still further diluted in relation to total restructuring costs.
Ob upoštevanju znatne državne pomoči, od katere je imela ladjedelnica v tem času koristi, je lastni prispevek, glede na skupni znesek stroškov za prestrukturiranje, še manjši.
Moreover, the Commission has to take into account the whole restructuring period, starting from 2002.
Poleg tega mora Komisija upoštevati celotno obdobje prestrukturiranja, z začetkom leta 2002.
Considering the substantial State aid from which the yard has benefited in this period, the own contribution in relation to the total restructuring costs is even further diluted.
Ob upoštevanju velike državne pomoči, od katere je imela ladjedelnica v tem času koristi, je lastni prispevek v primerjavi s skupnim stroškom za prestrukturiranje še nižji.
Therefore the Commission considers that such a letter cannot be proof of actual and real financing of the September 2008 plan.
Zato Komisija meni, da takšen dopis ne dokazuje dejanskega in resničnega financiranja, navedenega v načrtu iz septembra 2008.
In any event, even if this financing was to be considered actual and real, and even analysing only the planned restructuring costs, the own contribution would amount to not more than 17 % of the restructuring costs [41], i.e. significantly less than required by the Guidelines.
V vsakem primeru pa bi, četudi bi se to financiranje obravnavalo kot dejansko in resnično in bi se analizirali samo načrtovani stroški za prestrukturiranje, lastni prispevek znašal samo 17 % stroškov za prestrukturiranje [41], tj. znatno manj, kot zahtevajo Smernice.
The Commission replied by letter of 15 July 2005.
V dopisu z dne 24. junija 2005 so poljski organi navedli, da odločitev vsebuje zaupne informacije, in zaprosili, naj se te informacije izbrišejo iz javne različice odločitve.
By letter of 4 October 2005, registered on 7 October 2005, the Polish authorities submitted their comments on the decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure.
Komisija je odgovorila z dopisi z dne 12. julija, 2. avgusta in 9. septembra 2005.