natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to the information supplied by Sweden Post ‘… the market is dominated by DHL, Schenker, DSV and [Sweden Post], with [Sweden Post] and DSV competing for third place.
Sodeč po informacijah, ki jih je predložila Švedska pošta, „(…) trg obvladujejo DHL, Schenker, DSV in [Švedska pošta], pri čemer [Švedska pošta] in DSV tekmujeta za tretje mesto.
In addition, there are both local and nationwide haulage firms which offer transportation of pallets.
Poleg tega obstajajo lokalna in tudi vsedržavna prevozna podjetja, ki nudijo prevoz palet.
There are some 14000 companies in the transport sector in Sweden and it is not possible to say how many of them also include a pallet service in their product range.’ These factors should therefore be taken as an indication of direct exposure to competition.
V transportnem sektorju na Švedskem je okrog 14000 družb in ni mogoče reči, koliko jih v svojo ponudbo izdelkov uvršča tudi paletno storitev.“ Te dejavnike je zato treba obravnavati kot znak neposredne izpostavljenosti konkurenci.
Third and fourth party logistics
Logistika tretje in četrte stranke
On the market for third and fourth party logistics as defined under recital 2(k), Sweden Post’s market share is fairly negligible at less than [… %], with ‘a large number of Swedish and international players operating on the Swedish market, such as DHL, Schenker, DSV and Green Cargo.
Na trgu za logistiko tretje in četrte stranke, kot je opredeljena v uvodni izjavi (2)(k) zgoraj, je tržni delež Švedske pošte z manj kot (… %) precej zanemarljiv, pri čemer „na švedskem trgu deluje veliko število švedskih in mednarodnih akterjev, kot so DHL, Schenker, DSV in Green Cargo.
In addition, there are companies which were originally in the shipping and forwarding industry with their own global networks, such as Maersk and Tradimus’, according to the information supplied by Sweden Post.
Poleg tega so tu še družbe, ki so bile sprva v sektorju odpreme in špediterstva, s svojimi lastnimi globalnimi omrežji, kot sta Maersk in Tradimus“, če sodimo po informacijah, ki jih je predložila Švedska pošta.
Other players that offer newly issued stamps on the philately market in Sweden are locally established Swedish post operators and foreign, mainly Nordic, post operators.
Drugi akterji, ki nudijo novo izdane poštne znamke na filatelističnem trgu na Švedskem, so lokalni švedski poštni operaterji in tuji, pretežno nordijski poštni operaterji.
However, the philately market is not limited to stamps offered by post operators but also comprises sales of stamps through auctioneers, stamp traders and sales on the Internet through different sales- and auction sites.
Toda filatelistični trg ni omejen na poštne znamke, ki jih nudijo poštni operaterji, temveč vključuje tudi prodajo poštnih znamk prek dražbarjev, trgovcev z znamkami in prodajo na internetu prek različnih prodajnih in avkcijskih spletnih strani.
Sweden Post’s estimated market share on the overall market for philatelic services in Sweden, whether provided by dealers or auction houses, is estimated at [… %], auctioneers hold a joint market share of [… %], stamp traders jointly [… %], sales on the Internet jointly [… %] and other post operators in Sweden [… %] all together.
Ocenjeni tržni delež Švedske pošte na celotnem trgu za filatelistične storitve na Švedskem, ki jih opravljajo trgovci ali borzne hiše, znaša (… %), dražbarji imajo (… %) skupni tržni delež, trgovci z znamkami skupaj (… %), prodaja na internetu skupaj (… %), vsi drugi poštni operaterji na Švedskem pa skupaj (… %).
The estimated aggregate shares of the three largest auctioneers ([… %]) is somewhat greater than that of Sweden Post.
Ocenjeni skupni delež treh največjih dražbarjev ((… %)) je nekoliko večji od deleža Švedske pošte.
In view of the factors examined in recitals 2 to 23, the condition of direct exposure to competition laid down in Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC should be considered to be met in Sweden in respect of the following services:
Glede na dejavnike, preučene v uvodnih izjavah (2) do (23), je treba pogoj neposredne izpostavljenosti konkurenci, določen v členu 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES, šteti za izpolnjenega na Švedskem za naslednje storitve:
large sorted non-priority shipments in metropolitan areas;
velike sortirane neprednostne pošiljke v okoljih velemest;
domestic standard business to business parcel services;
medpodjetniške storitve standardne paketne pošte v domovini;
domestic standard business to consumer parcel services;
storitve standardne paketne pošte od podjetij do potrošnika v domovini;
domestic pallet services (also called light goods services);
paletne storitve (imenovane tudi storitve za lahko blago) v domovini;
third and fourth party logistics;
logistika tretje in četrte stranke;
philatelic services; and
filatelistične storitve ter
international parcel services.
storitve paketne pošte v tujini.
Since the condition of unrestricted access to the market is deemed to be met, Directive 2004/17/EC should not apply when contracting entities award contracts intended to enable the services listed in points (a) to (h) of recital 24 to be carried out in Sweden, nor when design contests are organised for the pursuit of such an activity in Sweden.
Ker se zdi, da je pogoj neomejenega dostopa do trga izpolnjen, se Direktiva 2004/17/ES ne bi smela uporabljati, če naročniki oddajajo naročila, katerih namen je omogočiti izvedbo storitev, navedenih v točkah (a) do (h) uvodne izjave (24), na Švedskem ali če so organizirani natečaji za opravljanje te dejavnosti na Švedskem.
This Decision is based on the legal and factual situation as of June to September 2008 as it appears from the information submitted by Sweden Post and the Kingdom of Sweden.
Ta odločba temelji na pravnih in dejanskih razmerah od junija do septembra 2008, kot je razvidno iz informacij, ki sta jih predložila Švedska pošta in Kraljevina Švedska.
Directive 2004/17/EC shall not apply to contracts awarded by contracting entities and intended to enable the following services to be carried out in Sweden:
Direktiva 2004/17/ES se ne uporablja za javna naročila, ki jih oddajo naročniki in so namenjena omogočanju izvajanja naslednjih storitev na Švedskem:
Defined as certain postal code areas pertaining to larger cities and environs, such as Stockholm, Gothenburg, Malmö and Västerås.
Opredeljena kot določena območja poštnih številk, ki se nanašajo na večja mesta in okolice, kot so Stockholm, Göteborg, Malmö in Västerås.
On average 0,40 SEK — in comparison, the price for a non-priority letter of up to 20 g (single item) is 4,0 SEK and the price for non-priority letters in large sorted shipments outside of the metropolitan areas is 2,84 SEK.
V povprečju 0,40 SEK – za primerjavo, cena za neprednostno pismo do 20 g (posamezna enota) je 4,0 SEK, cena za neprednostna pisma v velikih sortiranih pošiljkah zunaj okolij velemest pa 2,84 SEK.
On average, the price in metropolitan areas is 16,39 % cheaper for non-priority letters in large sorted shipments.
V povprečju je v okoljih velemest cena za neprednostna pisma v velikih sortiranih pošiljkah za 16,39 % nižja.
Note of 28.2.2008, Dnr 656/2007.
Opomba z dne 28.2.2008, Dnr 656/2007.
Measured by value, the markets shares were [… %] for, respectively, 2005, 2006 and 2007, whereas the corresponding markets shares measured in terms of volume for the same years were respectively [… %].
Tržni deleži za leta 2005, 2006 in 2007, izmerjeni v vrednosti, so bili (… %), medtem ko so bili ustrezni tržni deleži za ista leta, izmerjeni v količini (… %).
See the request, point 3.1, C, p. 25-26.
Glej zahtevo, točka 3.1, C, str. 25.
For instance, roughly one quarter of Swedish households are not connected to the Internet.
Na primer, približno ena četrtina švedskih gospodinjstev nima povezave z internetom.
Furthermore, the part of the Swedish population that pays its bills via internet is stated to be ‘slightly over half’, which, conversely, means that almost half do not do so.
Ob tem naj bi tisti del švedskega prebivalstva, ki plačuje račune prek interneta, predstavljal „nekaj več kot polovico“, kar pomeni, da skoraj polovica tega ne počne.
See also the conclusion in the same sense set out in recital 10 of Commission Decision 2007/564/EC of 6 August 2007 exempting certain services in the postal sector in Finland, excluding the Åland Islands, from the application of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (OJ L 215, 18.8.2007, p. 21).
Glej tudi sklepno ugotovitev v istem smislu, navedeno v uvodni izjavi 10 Odločbe Komisije 2007/564/ES z dne 6. avgusta 2007 o izvzetju nekaterih storitev v poštnem sektorju na Finskem, z izjemo Ålandskih otokov, iz uporabe Direktive 2004/17/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil naročnikov v vodnem, energetskem in transportnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev (UL L 215 z dne 18.8.2007, str. 21).
2005: [confidential] 2006: [confidential].
2005: (… %), 2006: (… %).
European Court reports 2002 Page II-00875.
Zbirka odločb 2002, stran II-00875.
Population density was not considered to be a relevant factor in reaching the just-mentioned Decision 2007/564/EC concerning Finland, whose population density — 17,4 inhabitants per km2 as of 1 January 2007 — is lower than the Swedish population density, 22,2 inhabitants per km2 as of 1 January 2007.
Gostota poseljenosti se ni štela kot pomemben dejavnik pri sprejemanju pravkar omenjene Odločbe Komisije 2007/564/ES, ki zadeva Finsko, gostota poseljenosti katere – 17,4 prebivalca na km2 na dan 1.1.2007 – je nižja kot gostota poseljenosti Švedske, 22,2 prebivalca na km2 na dan 1.1.2007.
Including its addressed direct mail, which, however, is deemed by Sweden Post in its request to be part of the addressed physical message market, ‘taking into consideration, inter alia, the division of postal services made in the Utilities Directive.’
Vključno z njeno naslovljeno direktno pošto, ki pa jo Švedska pošta v svoji zahtevi šteje kot del trga naslovljenih fizičnih sporočil, „med drugim ob upoštevanju delitve poštnih storitev iz Direktive o javnih gospodarskih službah.“
See point 11 of Commission Decision of 8 April 2005 (Case No IV/M.3648 — GRUNER + JAHR/MPS).
Glej točko 11 Odločbe Komisije z dne 8. aprila 2005 (zadeva št. IV/M.3648 – GRUNER + JAHR/MPS).
The media concerned were publicity in periodicals, television, Radio and internet.
Zadevni mediji so bili reklama v periodičnem tisku, na televiziji, radiu in internetu.
See in the same sense, point 15 of Commission Decision of 24 January 2005 (Case No IV/M.3579 — WPP/GREY), which, inter alia, states ‘… it rather appears that different media types are complementary rather than interchangeable, since different media can address different audiences in different ways.’
Glej v istem smislu točko 15 Odločbo Komisije z dne 24. januarja 2005 (zadeva št. IV/M.3579 – WPP/GREY), ki med drugim navaja: „… bolj se zdi, da se različne vrste medijev dopolnjujejo, kot da so medsebojno zamenljive, saj različni mediji lahko nagovarjajo različne publike na različne načine.“
According to a study provided by Sweden Post and accompanying its request, Sweden Post ‘in fact makes no distinction between the two types of service.
Glede na raziskavo, ki jo je posredovala Švedska pošta in je priložena njeni zahtevi, Švedska pošta „pravzaprav ne razlikuje med obema vrstama storitev.
Whether the parcel is C2C or C2B, the service is provided under the same product name (“Postpaket”).
Ne glede na to, ali je paket namenjen od potrošnika do potrošnika ali od potrošnika do podjetij, se storitev opravlja pod istim imenom proizvoda („Postpaket“).
Because of this close substitutability on the supply-side, it is appropriate to treat these services as one C2X service.
Zaradi te bližnje nadomestljivosti na strani ponudbe je primerno, da se te storitve obravnava kot eno storitev C2X.
’ This is also consistent with analysis adopted for Finland in Decision 2007/564/EC.
“ To je tudi skladno z analizo, ki je bila privzeta za Finsko v Odločbi 2007/564/ES.
However, according to Sweden Post, the relevant market to evaluate its markets position against, would be a larger ‘Messages Market’, which, in addition to addressed letters of all categories and types, priority and non-priority newspapers and periodicals as well as addressed direct mail, would include ‘all electronic alternatives to physical distribution of postal items.
Toda po mnenju Švedske pošte bi bil upoštevni trg, v primerjavi s katerim bi ocenili položaj njenih trgov, večji „trg sporočil“, ki bi poleg naslovljenih pisemskih pošiljk vseh kategorij in vrst, prednostnih in neprednostnih časopisov in periodičnega tiska ter naslovljene direktne pošte vključeval „vse elektronske alternative fizični dostavi poštnih pošiljk.
(…) Examples include e-mail, EDI, communication via websites (with information submission, transaction execution, etc.), business systems (which generate communication and service applications, such as e-invoicing systems) and telephony services (in the form of SMS and MMS).’ On a market thus defined Sweden Post would have ‘a limited market share’.
(…) Med drugim gre za elektronsko pošto, elektronsko izmenjavo podatkov, komunikacijo prek spletnih strani (s pošiljanjem informacij, izvajanjem transakcij itd.), poslovne sisteme (ki proizvajajo komunikacijske in storitvene aplikacije, kot so sistemi za elektronsko izdajanje računov) in telefonske storitve (v obliki SMS in MMS).“ Na tako opredeljenem trgu bi Švedska pošta imela „omejen tržni delež“.
That is the situation when there is a market share of 50 %’.
Taka je situacija, kadar je tržni delež 50 %“.
In view of the high level of concentration [… %] on this market and in the absence of any other indicators to the contrary, it should therefore be concluded that non-priority letter services in general are not directly exposed to competition in Sweden.
Glede na visoko stopnjo koncentracije ((… %)) na tem trgu in ob pomanjkanju kakršnih koli drugih nasprotnih kazalcev je zato treba zaključiti, da storitve neprednostnih pisemskih pošiljk nasploh niso neposredno izpostavljene konkurenci na Švedskem.
Case T-395/94.
Zadeva T-395/94.
For the purposes of this Decision, philatelic services are defined as ‘sales of stamps and stamp related products mainly to collectors of stamps and, to a limited extent, to gift- and souvenir buyers.’ According to the information given, Sweden Post is the largest company that continuously issues new stamps in Sweden.
V tej odločbi so filatelistične storitve opredeljene kot „prodaja poštnih znamk in z njimi povezanih izdelkov zlasti zbiralcem znamk ter, v določenem obsegu, kupcem daril in spominkov.“ Sodeč po predstavljenih informacijah je Švedska pošta največja družba, ki vseskozi izdaja nove poštne znamke na Švedskem.
See point 328 of the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2002.
Glej točko 328 sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje (tretji senat) z dne 28. februarja 2002.
Atlantic Container Line AB and Others v Commission of the European Communities.
Atlantic Container Line AB in drugi v. Komisija Evropskih skupnosti.
The request is accompanied by the conclusions of the independent national authority, Konkurrensverket [4] (the Swedish Competition Authority), whose main comments and conclusions are as follows: ‘Konkurrensverket does not have any decisive objections against the way in which [Sweden Post] has delimited the relevant markets. (…) The picture of an existing and increasing competition against [Sweden Post] from new companies within the postal sector is correct, this applies in particular to the more densely populated areas.
Zahtevi so priloženi zaključki neodvisnega nacionalnega organa, Konkurrensverket [4] (švedski organ za konkurenco), čigar glavne pripombe in zaključki so naslednji: „Konkurrensverket nima nobenih bistvenih ugovorov zoper način, na katerega je (Švedska pošta) razmejila upoštevne trge … Slika trenutne in vse večje konkurence, ki jo (Švedski pošti) predstavljajo nove družbe v poštnem sektorju, je pravilna; to še posebej velja za gosteje naseljena območja.
establishing that Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors is not applicable to the production of electricity in the Czech Republic
o neuporabi člena 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil naročnikov v vodnem, energetskem in transportnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev pri proizvodnji električne energije v Češki republiki
(notified under document number C(2008) 8569)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 8569)
Having regard to the request submitted by the Czech Republic by e-mail received on 3 July 2008,
ob upoštevanju zahtevka, ki ga je Češka poslala po elektronski pošti, prejeti 3. julija 2008,
On 3 July 2008, the Commission received a Czech request pursuant to Article 30(4) of Directive 2004/17/EC, transmitted to the Commission by e-mail.
Komisija je 3. julija 2008 prejela zahtevek Češke v skladu s členom 30(4) Direktive 2004/17/ES, ki je bil Komisiji poslan po elektronski pošti.
The Commission requested additional information by e-mail of 26 September 2008, which was transmitted by the Czech authorities by e-mail of 9 October 2008.
Komisija je v elektronski pošti z dne 26. septembra 2008 zahtevala dodatne informacije, ki so jih češki organi poslali po elektronski pošti 9. oktobra 2008.
The request submitted by the Czech Republic concerns production of electricity.
Zahtevek Češke republike se nanaša na proizvodnjo električne energije.
The request is accompanied by a letter from an independent national authority, (Energetický regulační úřad, the Czech energy regulatory authority), and by a letter from another independent authority (Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže, the Czech Office for the Protection of Competition).
Zahtevku je priloženo pismo neodvisnega nacionalnega organa (Energetický regulační úřad, češki organ za upravljanje energije) in pismo drugega neodvisnega organa (Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže, češki urad za varstvo konkurence).
Both of these authorities analyse the conditions of access to he relevant market, finding it to be unrestricted, while none of them establish that the further condition relating to the direct exposure to competition is met in respect of electricity production in the Czech Republic.
Oba organa analizirata pogoje za dostop do zadevnega trga in ugotavljata, da je ta neomejen, pri čemer ni nihče od njiju ugotovil, da bi bili dodatni pogoji v zvezi z neposredno izpostavljenostjo konkurenci izpolnjeni, kar zadeva proizvodnjo električne energije v Češki republiki.
Direct exposure to competition is assessed on the basis of objective criteria, taking account of the specific characteristics of the sector concerned.
Neposredna izpostavljenost konkurenci se oceni na podlagi objektivnih meril ob upoštevanju posebnih značilnosti zadevnega sektorja.
This legislation is listed in Annex XI to Directive 2004/17/EC, which, for the electricity sector, refers to Directive 96/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 1996 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity [2].
Ta zakonodaja je navedena v Prilogi XI k Direktivi 2004/17/ES, ki se v zvezi z elektroenergetskim sektorjem sklicuje na Direktivo 96/92/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. decembra 1996 o skupnih pravilih notranjega trga z električno energijo [2].
The Czech Republic has implemented and applied not only Directive 96/92/EC but also Directive 2003/54/EC, opting for legal and organisational unbundling for transmission and distribution networks except for the smallest distribution companies, which, while continuing to be subject to accounting unbundling, are exempted from the requirements of legal and organisational unbundling having less than 100000 customers or serving electricity systems with consumption lower than 3 TWh in 1996.
Češka republika ne izvaja in uporablja le Direktive 96/92/ES, ampak tudi Direktivo 2003/54/ES, pri čemer je izbrala pravno in organizacijsko ločevanje za prenosna in distribucijska omrežja, razen za najmanjša distribucijska podjetja, ki so, medtem ko zanje še vedno velja ločevanje računovodskih izkazov, izvzeta iz zahteve pravnega in organizacijskega ločevanja ter imajo manj kot 100000 odjemalcev ali oskrbujejo elektroenergetske sisteme, katerih poraba je bila leta 1996 manjša od 3 TWh.
Furthermore, the transmission system operator, CEPS, has been ownership unbundled.
Razen tega ima upravljavec prenosnega omrežja, CEPS, ločeno lastništvo.
Direct exposure to competition should be evaluated on the basis of various indicators, none of which are, per se, decisive.
Neposredno izpostavljenost konkurenci je treba oceniti na podlagi različnih kazalnikov, od katerih ni nobeden odločilen.
In respect of the markets concerned by this decision, the market share of the main players on a given market constitutes one criterion which should be taken into account.
V zvezi s trgi, na katere se nanaša ta odločba, je eno od meril, ki ga je treba upoštevati, tržni delež glavnih akterjev na določenem trgu.
Given the characteristics of the markets concerned, further criteria should also be taken into account such as the functioning of the balancing mechanism, price competition and the degree of customer switching.
Glede na značilnosti zadevnih trgov bi bilo treba upoštevati tudi druga merila, kot so delovanje izravnalnega mehanizma, cenovna konkurenca in stopnja menjave dobavitelja.
The request submitted by the Czech Republic concerns production of electricity in the Czech Republic.
Zahtevek Češke se nanaša na proizvodnjo električne energije na Češkem.
The Czech request considers that the relevant geographical market would be a market larger than the national territory, incorporating the territories of the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia, Austria and Germany.
Zahtevek Češke navaja, da bi zadevni geografski trg bil trg, večji od nacionalnega ozemlja, ki bi vključeval ozemlja Češke, Poljske, Slovaške, Avstrije in Nemčije.
It is argued that a main reason for this market definition is the high share of interconnection capacity (with several Member States) as compared to domestic generation and demand.
Glavni razlog za to opredelitev trga naj bi bil visok delež zmogljivosti medsebojnih povezav (z več državami članicami) v primerjavi z domačo proizvodnjo in povpraševanjem.
According to the information given by the Czech authorities in their answer of 9 October 2008, 25,6 TWh were exported in 2007 and 9,5 TWh imported during the same year.
Po informacijah čeških organov iz odgovora z dne 9. oktobra 2008 se je leta 2007 izvozilo 25,6 TWh, medtem ko se je v istem letu uvozilo 9,5 TWh.
The Czech Republic is thus a net exporter of electricity with net exports amounting to 16,1 TWh, equivalent to almost 20 % [4] of the total, net electricity generation (81,4 TWh).
Češka je zato neto izvoznik električne energije z neto izvozom 16,1 TWh, kar znaša približno 20 % [4] celotne neto proizvodnje električne energije (81,4 TWh).
A further argument submitted with respect to the existence of a wider geographic market is a development towards price convergence between the national market within the Czech Republic and the one in Germany as well as the growing role of the PXE Prague energy Exchange.
Dodatno pojasnilo, predloženo v zvezi z obstojem širšega geografskega trga, je premik proti cenovni konvergenci med nacionalnim češkim trgom in nemškim trgom ter tudi vse večja vloga praške energetske borze PXE.
However, relatively high interconnection capacity and price convergence are not sufficient to delineate a relevant market.
Vendar sorazmerno visoka zmogljivost medsebojnih povezav in cenovne konvergence nista dovolj za določitev zadevnega trga.