natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Organisations with sites located in one or more Member States should be able to register all or a number of those sites under one single registration.
Organizacije z lokacijami v eni ali več državah članicah bi morale imeti možnost, da z eno samo registracijo registrirajo eno ali več lokacij.
The mechanism for establishing an organisation's compliance with all applicable legal requirements relating to the environment should be strengthened in order to enhance the credibility of EMAS and, in particular, to enable Member States to reduce the administrative burden of registered organisations by way of deregulation or regulatory relief.
Treba bi bilo okrepiti mehanizem za ugotovitev, ali organizacija izpolnjuje veljavne zakonske zahteve v zvezi z okoljem, da se okrepi verodostojnost sistema EMAS in zlasti da se državam članicam omogoči, da z deregulacijo ali oprostitvijo uporabe zakonskih določb zmanjšajo upravno breme registriranih organizacij.
The process of implementation of EMAS should include involvement of employees and workers of the organisation as this increases job satisfaction, as well as knowledge of environmental issues which can be replicated in and outside the work environment.
Postopek izvajanja sistema EMAS bi moral vključevati udeležbo zaposlenih in delavcev organizacije, saj to povečuje zadovoljstvo pri delu, pa tudi poznavanje okoljskih vprašanj, ki se lahko razširja v delovnem okolju in zunaj njega.
The EMAS logo should be an appealing communication and marketing tool for organisations, which raises the awareness of buyers and other stakeholders to EMAS.
Logotip sistema EMAS bi moral biti privlačno komunikacijsko in tržniško orodje za organizacije, ki bi lahko povečevalo ozaveščenost kupcev in drugih zainteresiranih strani sistema EMAS.
Rules for the use of the EMAS logo should be simplified by the use of one single logo and existing restrictions should be removed save for those relating to the product and packaging.
Pravila za uporabo logotipa sistema EMAS bi morala biti poenostavljena z uporabo enotnega logotipa, sedanje omejitve pa bi bilo treba odpraviti, razen tistih za proizvode in embalažo.
There should be no confusion with environmental product labels.
Ne bi smelo prihajati do zamenjav z znaki za okolje za proizvode.
Costs and fees for registration under EMAS should be reasonable and proportionate to the size of the organisation and the work to be done by the Competent Bodies.
Stroški in registracijske pristojbine v okviru sistema EMAS bi morali biti razumni in sorazmerni z velikostjo organizacije in delom, ki ga mora pristojni organ opraviti.
Without prejudice to the rules of the Treaty on State aid, exemptions or reductions of fees should be considered for small organisations.
Za majhne organizacije bi bilo treba proučiti izjeme ali zmanjšanje pristojbine brez poseganja v pravila o državni pomoči iz Pogodbe.
Organisations should produce and make publicly available periodic environmental statements providing the public and other interested parties with information on their compliance with applicable legal requirements relating to the environment and their environmental performance.
Organizacije bi morale narediti in dati na voljo javnosti redne okoljske izjave, ki bi javnosti in drugim zainteresiranim stranem zagotavljale informacije o izpolnjevanju veljavnih zakonskih zahtev v zvezi z okoljem in o njihovi okoljski uspešnosti.
In order to ensure relevance and comparability of the information, reporting on the organisations’ environmental performance should be on the basis of generic and sector-specific performance indicators focusing on key environmental areas at the process and product level using appropriate benchmarks and scales.
Za zagotovitev ustreznosti in primerljivosti informacij bi moralo poročanje o okoljski uspešnosti organizacij temeljiti na splošnih, za posamezno panogo značilnih kazalnikih uspešnosti, osredotočenih na ključna okoljska področja na ravni procesa in proizvoda ob uporabi ustreznih meril in lestvic.
This should help organisations compare their environmental performance both over different reporting periods and with the environmental performance of other organisations.
Tako bi lahko organizacije laže primerjale svojo okoljsko uspešnost v različnih obdobjih poročanja in z okoljsko uspešnostjo drugih organizacij.
Reference documents including best environmental management practice and environmental performance indicators for specific sectors should be developed through information exchange and collaboration between Member States.
Z izmenjavo informacij in sodelovanjem med državami članicami bi bilo treba razviti referenčne dokumente, ki vključujejo najboljše prakse okoljskega ravnanja in kazalnike okoljske uspešnosti za posebne sektorje.
Those documents should help organisations better focus on the most important environmental aspects in a given sector.
S pomočjo teh dokumentov bi se lahko organizacije bolje osredotočale na najpomembnejše okoljske vidike določenega sektorja.
Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products [6] organises accreditation at the national and European levels and sets the overall framework for accreditation.
Uredba (ES) št. 765/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. julija 2008 o določitvi zahtev za akreditacijo in nadzor trga v zvezi s trženjem izdelkov [6] ureja akreditacijo na nacionalni in evropski ravni ter določa splošni okvir za akreditacijo.
This Regulation should complement those rules in so far as necessary, while taking into account the specific features of EMAS such as the need to ensure a high level of credibility towards stakeholders, especially Member States and, where appropriate, should set more specific rules.
Ta uredba bi morala dopolnjevati ta pravila, kolikor je to potrebno, ob upoštevanju posebnih lastnosti sistema EMAS, kakor npr. potrebe po zagotovitvi visoke stopnje verodostojnosti med interesnimi skupinami, zlasti državami članicami, in, kadar je to primerno, določi natančnejša pravila.
The EMAS provisions should ensure and steadily improve the competence of environmental verifiers by providing for an independent and neutral accreditation or licensing system, training and an appropriate supervision of their activities and thus guarantee the transparency and credibility of organisations participating in EMAS.
Določbe EMAS bi morale zagotavljati in nenehno izboljševati usposobljenost okoljskih preveriteljev z zagotovitvijo neodvisnega in nevtralnega sistema za akreditiranje ali licenciranje, usposabljanjem in ustreznim nadzorom njihovih dejavnosti ter tako zagotavljati preglednost in verodostojnost organizacij, ki sodelujejo v sistemu EMAS.
When a Member State decides not to use accreditation for EMAS, Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 should apply.
Če se država članica odloči, da ne bo uporabila akreditacij za sistem EMAS, bi moral veljati člen 5(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 765/2008.
Promotion and support activities should be undertaken by both the Member States and the Commission.
Dejavnosti spodbujanja in podpore bi morale izvajati tako države članice kot tudi Komisija.
Without prejudice to the rules of the Treaty on State aid, incentives should be given by Member States to registered organisations such as access to funding or tax incentives in the framework of schemes supporting environmental performance of industry, provided that organisations are able to demonstrate an improvement of their environmental performance.
Brez poseganja v pravila o državni pomoči iz Pogodbe bi morale države članice registriranim organizacijam dajati spodbude, kot so dostop do sredstev ali davčne spodbude v okviru sistemov, ki podpirajo okoljsko uspešnost panoge, če lahko te organizacije dokažejo izboljšavo svoje okoljske uspešnosti.
Member States and the Commission should develop and implement specific measures aimed at greater participation in EMAS by organisations, in particular small organisations.
Države članice in Komisija bi morale razviti in izvajati posebne ukrepe, katerih namen bi bilo večje sodelovanje organizacij, zlasti majhnih, v sistemu EMAS.
With the aim of ensuring a harmonised application of this Regulation, the Commission should produce sectoral reference documents in the area covered by this Regulation following a priority programme.
Komisija bi morala za zagotovitev usklajene uporabe te uredbe po prednostnem programu oblikovati sektorske referenčne dokumente na področju, ki ga zajema ta uredba.
This Regulation should be revised, if appropriate, within five years of its entry into force in the light of experience gained.
To uredbo bi bilo treba glede na pridobljene izkušnje pregledati v petih letih od začetka njene veljavnosti, če se to zdi primerno.
This Regulation replaces Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 which should therefore be repealed.
Ta uredba nadomešča Uredbo (ES) št. 761/2001, ki bi jo zato bilo treba razveljaviti.
Given that useful elements of Commission Recommendation 2001/680/EC of 7 September 2001 on guidance for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council allowing voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) [7] and of Commission Recommendation 2003/532/EC of 10 July 2003 on guidance for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council allowing voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) concerning the selection and use of environmental performance indicators [8] are included in this Regulation, those acts should no longer be used as they are superseded by this Regulation.
Ker ta uredba vsebuje koristne elemente Priporočila Komisije 2001/680/ES z dne 7. septembra 2001 o smernicah za izvajanje Uredbe (ES) št. 761/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. marca 2001 o prostovoljnem sodelovanju organizacij v Sistemu Skupnosti za okoljsko ravnanje in presojo (EMAS) [7] in Priporočila Komisije 2003/532/ES z dne 10. julija 2003 o smernicah za izvajanje Uredbe (ES) št. 761/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prostovoljnem sodelovanju organizacij v Sistemu Skupnosti za okoljsko ravnanje in presojo (EMAS) glede izbire in uporabe kazalnikov okoljske uspešnosti [8], se ta akta ne bi smela več uporabljati, saj ju nadomešča ta uredba.
Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely to create a single credible scheme and avoid the establishment of different national schemes, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Ker ciljev te uredbe, in sicer vzpostavitve enotnega verodostojnega sistema in preprečitev vzpostavitve različnih nacionalnih sistemov, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ju zaradi obsega in učinkov ukrepov laže doseže Skupnost, lahko Skupnost sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.
In particular the Commission should be empowered to establish procedures for the peer evaluation of Competent Bodies, to develop sectoral reference documents, to recognise existing environmental management systems, or parts thereof, as complying with corresponding requirements of this Regulation and to amend Annexes I to VIII.
Zlasti bi bilo treba Komisiji podeliti pooblastila za vzpostavitev postopkov za medsebojno ocenjevanje pristojnih organov, za razvoj sektorskih referenčnih dokumentov ter za priznavanje obstoječih sistemov okoljskega ravnanja ali njihovih delov v skladu z ustreznimi zahtevami te uredbe ter spremeniti priloge I do VIII.
Since those measures are of general scope and are designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation, inter alia, by supplementing it with new non-essential elements, they must be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC.
Ker so ti ukrepi splošnega obsega in so namenjeni spreminjanju nebistvenih določb te uredbe, med drugim z njenim dopolnjevanjem z novimi nebistvenimi določbami, jih je treba sprejeti v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 5(a) Sklepa 1999/468/ES.
Since a period of time is required to ensure that the framework for the proper functioning of this Regulation is in place, Member States should have a period of 12 months following the date of entry into force of this Regulation to modify the procedures followed by Accreditation Bodies and Competent Bodies under the corresponding provisions of this Regulation.
Ker je za zagotovitev, da je uveden okvir za ustrezno delovanje te uredbe, potrebno določeno obdobje, bi morale države članice imeti možnost, da v 12 mesecih po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe spremenijo postopke za akreditacijske organe in pristojne organe na podlagi ustreznih določb te uredbe.
Within that 12-month period, Accreditation Bodies and Competent Bodies should be entitled to continue to apply the procedures established under Regulation (EC) No 761/2001,
V teh 12 mesecih bi morali akreditacijski organi in pristojni organi imeti možnost, da še naprej uporabljajo postopke iz Uredbe (ES) št. 761/2001 –
A Community eco-management and audit scheme, hereinafter referred to as ‘EMAS’, is hereby established, allowing voluntary participation by organisations located inside or outside the Community.
Ustanavlja se Sistem Skupnosti za okoljsko ravnanje in presojo, v nadaljnjem besedilu „EMAS“, ki dovoljuje prostovoljno udeležbo organizacij s sedežem znotraj ali zunaj Skupnosti.
The objective of EMAS, as an important instrument of the Sustainable Consumption and Production and Sustainable Industrial Policy Action Plan, is to promote continuous improvements in the environmental performance of organisations by the establishment and implementation of environmental management systems by organisations, the systematic, objective and periodic evaluation of the performance of such systems, the provision of information on environmental performance, an open dialogue with the public and other interested parties and the active involvement of employees in organisations and appropriate training.
Cilj sistema EMAS kot pomembnega instrumenta akcijskega načrta za trajnostno potrošnjo in proizvodnjo ter trajnostno industrijsko politiko je spodbujati nenehne izboljšave pri okoljski uspešnosti organizacij, in sicer z vzpostavitvijo in izvajanjem sistemov okoljskega ravnanja s strani organizacij, sistematskim, objektivnim in rednim vrednotenjem uspešnosti takih sistemov, zagotavljanjem informacij o okoljski uspešnosti, odprtim dialogom z javnimi in drugimi zainteresiranimi stranmi ter dejavnim vključevanjem zaposlenih v organizacijah in ustreznim usposabljanjem.
‘environmental policy’ means the overall intentions and direction of an organisation relating to its environmental performance as formally expressed by top management including compliance with all applicable legal requirements relating to the environment and also a commitment to continuous improvement of environmental performance.
„okoljska politika“ pomeni splošne namene in usmeritev organizacije v zvezi z njeno okoljsko uspešnostjo, kot jih javno predstavi najvišje vodstvo organizacije, kar vključuje skladnost z vsemi veljavnimi zakonskimi zahtevami v zvezi z okoljem in tudi zavezanost nenehnemu izboljševanju okoljske uspešnosti.
It provides a framework for action and for the setting of environmental objectives and targets;
Oblikuje tudi okvir za delovanje in zastavljanje okoljskih ciljev;
‘environmental performance’ means the measurable results of an organisation's management of its environmental aspects;
„okoljska uspešnost“ pomeni merljive rezultate upravljanja okoljskih vidikov organizacije;
‘legal compliance’ means full implementation of applicable legal requirements, including permit conditions, relating to the environment;
„skladnost z zakonodajo“ pomeni izvajanje veljavnih zakonskih zahtev v zvezi z okoljem v celoti, vključno s pogoji za dovoljenja;
‘environmental aspect’ means an element of an organisation's activities, products or services that has or can have an impact on the environment;
„okoljski vidik“ pomeni element dejavnosti, proizvodov ali storitev organizacije, ki vpliva ali lahko vpliva na okolje;
‘significant environmental aspect’ means an environmental aspect that has or can have a significant environmental impact;
„znaten okoljski vidik“ pomeni okoljski vidik, ki znatno vpliva ali lahko znatno vpliva na okolje;
‘direct environmental aspect’ means an environmental aspect associated with activities, products and services of the organisation itself over which it has direct management control;
„neposredni okoljski vidiki“ pomeni okoljske vidike, povezani z dejavnostmi, proizvodi in storitvami samih organizacij, nad katerimi imajo neposreden upravljavski nadzor;
‘indirect environmental aspect’ means an environmental aspect which can result from the interaction of an organisation with third parties and which can to a reasonable degree be influenced by an organisation;
„posredni okoljski vplivi“ pomeni okoljske vplive, ki so lahko posledica povezav organizacije s tretjimi osebami in na katere lahko do razumne meje vpliva organizacija;
‘environmental impact’ means any change to the environment, whether adverse or beneficial, wholly or partially resulting from an organisation's activities, products or services;
„vpliv na okolje“ pomeni vsako spremembo v okolju, bodisi škodljivo ali koristno, ki je v celoti ali deloma posledica dejavnosti, proizvodov ali storitev organizacije;
‘environmental review’ means an initial comprehensive analysis of environmental aspects, environmental impacts and environmental performance related to an organisation's activities, products and services;
„okoljski pregled“ pomeni začetno celovito analizo okoljskih vidikov, vplivov in uspešnosti, povezanih z dejavnostmi, proizvodi in storitvami organizacije;
‘environmental programme’ means a description of the measures, responsibilities and means taken or envisaged to achieve environmental objectives and targets and the deadlines for achieving the environmental objectives and targets;
„okoljski program“ pomeni opis ukrepov, odgovornosti in sredstev, sprejetih ali predvidenih za doseganje splošnih in posamičnih okoljskih ciljev, ter rokov za doseganje splošnih in posamičnih okoljskih ciljev;
‘environmental objective’ means an overall environmental goal, arising from the environmental policy, that an organisation sets itself to achieve, and which is quantified where practicable;
„splošni okoljski cilj“ pomeni celoten okoljski cilj, ki izhaja iz okoljske politike in ki si ga določi organizacija sama ter je količinsko opredeljen, kadar je to izvedljivo;
‘environmental target’ means a detailed performance requirement, arising from the environmental objectives, applicable to an organisation or parts thereof, and that needs to be set and met in order to achieve those objectives;
„posamični okoljski cilj“ pomeni podrobno opredeljeno zahtevo glede uspešnosti, ki izhaja iz okoljskih ciljev ter se nanaša na organizacijo ali dele te organizacije in jo je treba določiti in izpolniti, da bi bili ti cilji doseženi;
‘environmental management system’ means the part of the overall management system that includes the organisational structure, planning activities, responsibilities, practices, procedures, processes and resources for developing, implementing, achieving, reviewing and maintaining the environmental policy and managing the environmental aspects;
„sistem okoljskega ravnanja“ pomeni del celotnega sistema vodenja, ki vključuje organizacijsko strukturo, dejavnosti načrtovanja, odgovornosti, prakso, postopke, procese in vire za razvoj, izvedbo, doseganje, pregledovanje in vzdrževanje okoljske politike ter upravljanje okoljskih vidikov;
‘best environmental management practice’ means the most effective way to implement the environmental management system by organisations in a relevant sector and that can result in best environmental performance under given economic and technical conditions;
„najboljše prakse okoljskega ravnanja“ pomeni najuspešnejši način za izvajanje sistema okoljskega ravnanja s strani organizacij iz zadevnega sektorja in lahko v določenih gospodarskih in tehničnih pogojih pripomorejo k največji okoljski uspešnosti;
‘substantial change’ means any change in an organisation's operation, structure, administration, processes, activities, products or services that has or can have a significant impact on an organisation's environmental management system, the environment or human health;
„znatna sprememba“ pomeni spremembo v delovanju, strukturi, upravi, postopkih, dejavnostih, proizvodih ali storitvah organizacije, ki ima ali bi lahko imela znaten vpliv na sistem okoljskega ravnanja organizacije, okolje ali zdravje ljudi;
‘internal environmental audit’ means a systematic, documented, periodic and objective evaluation of the environmental performance of an organisation, management system and processes designed to protect the environment;
„notranja okoljska presoja“ pomeni sistematično, dokumentirano, redno in objektivno vrednotenje okoljske uspešnosti organizacije, sistema vodenja in postopkov za varstvo okolja;
‘auditor’ means an individual or group of individuals, belonging to an organisation itself or a natural or legal person external to that organisation, acting on behalf of that organisation, carrying out an assessment of, in particular, the environmental management system in place and determining conformity with the organisation's environmental policy and programme, including compliance with the applicable legal requirements relating to the environment;
„presojevalec“ pomeni posameznika ali skupino posameznikov, ki pripada sami organizaciji, ali fizično ali pravno osebo zunaj organizacije, ki deluje v imenu organizacije ter izvaja presojo zlasti vzpostavljenega sistema okoljskega vodenja in ugotavlja skladnost okoljske politike in okoljskega programa organizacije, ki vključuje skladnost z veljavnimi zakonskimi zahtevami v zvezi z okoljem;
‘environmental statement’ means the comprehensive information to the public and other interested parties regarding an organisation's:
„okoljska izjava“ pomeni celovite informacije za javnost in druge zainteresirane strani v zvezi z naslednjim:
structure and activities;
strukturo in dejavnostmi organizacije;
environmental policy and environmental management system;
okoljsko politiko organizacije in njenim sistemom okoljskega ravnanja;
environmental aspects and impacts;
okoljskimi vidiki in vplivi organizacije;
environmental programme, objectives and targets;
okoljskim programom ter splošnimi in posameznimi cilji organizacije,
environmental performance and compliance with applicable legal obligations relating to the environment as set out in Annex IV;
okoljsko uspešnostjo ter izpolnjevanjem veljavnih zakonskih zahtev v zvezi z okoljem, kot je določeno v Prilogi IV;
‘updated environmental statement’ means the comprehensive information to the public and other interested parties containing updates of the last validated environmental statement, only with regard to an organisation's environmental performance and compliance with applicable legal obligations relating to the environment as set out in Annex IV;
„posodobljena okoljska izjava“ pomeni celovite informacije za javnost in druge zainteresirane strani ter vsebuje posodobitve nazadnje potrjene okoljske izjave izključno v zvezi z okoljsko uspešnostjo organizacije in njenim izpolnjevanjem veljavnih zakonskih obveznosti v zvezi z okoljem, kot je določeno v Prilogi IV;
‘environmental verifier’ means:
„okoljski preveritelj“ pomeni:
a conformity assessment body as defined in Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 or any association or group of such bodies, which has obtained accreditation in accordance with this Regulation; or
organ za presojo skladnosti, kakor je določen v Uredbi (ES) št. 765/2008, ali vsako združenje ali skupino takih organov, ki pridobi akreditacijo v skladu s to uredbo, ali