natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Two-digit capacity growth in the next 2 years is expected in a variety of regions especially in China, India, Brazil and the Middle East.
V številnih regijah, zlasti na Kitajskem, v Indiji, Braziliji in na Bližnjem vzhodu se pričakuje dvoštevilčna rast proizvodne zmogljivosti.
China, the most important country in terms of increasing capacity, represents today about 40 % of the world crude steel making capacity and about three times the EU’s yearly consumption of steel.
Kitajska, ki je glede povečevanja proizvodne zmogljivosti na prvem mestu, ima 40 % svetovnih zmogljivosti za proizvodnjo surovega jekla in letno potrošnjo jekla, ki je približno trikrat večja od letne potrošnje jekla v EU.
Given the fact that the EU is an important market for steel in terms of size and price, especially in the context of a strong currency, it is likely that once the market recovers and the demand on the Union market improves, any excess in steel capacity would be re-directed to the EU.
EU je pomemben trg za jeklo glede na velikost in cene, zlasti zaradi močne valute, zato bo presežek jekla verjetno preusmerjen v EU, ko bo njen trg okreval in se bo povpraševanje povečalo.
In comparison, access to third country markets has been reduced to a various extent recently as countries in several geographical areas (such as Americas, Asia, Middle East) have taken measures to protect or support their steel industry.
Dostop do trgov tretjih držav je bil v zadnjem času v različni meri omejen, saj so države z več geografskih območij (obe Ameriki, Azija, Bližnji vzhod) sprejele ukrepe za zaščito svoje jeklene industrije ali za pomoč tej industriji.
These measures took different forms, including tariff increases, licensing requirement, buy local requirements, and concern markets with a significant share of the global consumption.
Ti ukrepi so bili različni, na primer povečanje tarif, uvedba zahtev po dovoljenjih, zahtev po kupovanju od lokalnih proizvajalcev, in so bili uvedeni na trgih z velikim deležem svetovne potrošnje.
The production of crude steel and stainless steel flat products in the EU reached the highest level in 2007 and 2006 respectively, and then started decreasing in 2008.
Proizvodnja surovega jekla in ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla v EU je bila največja v letih 2007 in 2006, nato pa se je leta 2008 začela zmanjševati.
During the first semester 2009 there was a contraction of 43,2 % compared to the first semester of 2008 as opposed to a contraction in world steel output of 22,4 % during the same period.
V prvi polovici leta 2009 se je zmanjšala za 43,2 % v primerjavi s prvo polovico leta 2008 in v nasprotju s padcem svetovne proizvodnje jekla za 22,4 % v istem obdobju.
The crisis has had an impact on all the largest steel producing countries of the EU, and as a reaction steel producers have reduced the number of days of production, thus increasing the idle capacity.
Kriza je vplivala na vse največje države proizvajalke jekla v EU in zato so proizvajalci jekla zmanjšali število proizvodnih dni, s tem pa so se povečale neizkoriščene zmogljivosti.
All producers have significantly reduced employment.
Vsi proizvajalci so znatno zmanjšali zaposlenost.
In June 2009 around 40 % of the work force in the EU steel sector was affected by the economic crises in the form of permanent or temporary lay-offs and short-time working.
Junija 2009 je gospodarska kriza prizadela približno 40 % delovne sile v jeklarskem sektorju EU, kar se je pokazalo v stalnih ali začasnih odpuščanjih in zaposlovanju za skrajšan delovni čas.
On the basis of recent trends in imports of steel products, of the current vulnerable situation of the EU industry, the continuing weak demand on the EU market and of the likelihood that current and future excess capacity would be re-directed to EU if demand would recover, a threat of injury to Union producers pursuant to Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 260/2009 can therefore be deemed to exist.
Na podlagi nedavnih gibanj uvoza jeklenih izdelkov, sedanje občutljivosti industrije EU, še vedno slabega povpraševanja na trgu EU in verjetnosti, da bo ob povečanju povpraševanja presežek proizvodnje v prihodnosti preusmerjen v EU, se lahko torej šteje, da obstaja tveganje škode za proizvajalce Unije v skladu s členom 11 Uredbe (ES) št. 260/2009.
Thus, the Union interest requires that imports of certain steel products should continue to be subject to prior surveillance in order to provide advanced statistical information permitting rapid analysis of import trends.
Zato je v interesu Unije, da se predhodni nadzor nad uvozom nekaterih jeklenih izdelkov ohrani za zagotovitev izčrpnih statističnih podatkov za hitro analizo uvoznih gibanj.
Rapid and anticipated trade data is necessary to deal with the vulnerability of the European steel market to sudden changes on world steel markets.
Zaradi občutljivosti evropskega trga jekla na nenadne spremembe na svetovnih trgih jekla so potrebne hitro dostopne napovedi o gibanju trgovine.
This is particularly important in the present crisis situation marked by uncertainties as to whether the demand will structurally pick up and whether the EU industry will actually benefit from it.
To je še zlasti pomembno v sedanji krizi, ko vlada negotovost v zvezi s strukturnim povečanjem povpraševanja in dejanskih koristi industrije EU od takšnega povečanja.
Furthermore, in view of the developments on the market of flat stainless steel products and large welded tubes and the situation of the industries at stake, and given that similar steel import monitoring systems include these products, it is appropriate that the scope of this system includes the products listed in Annex I.
Poleg tega je glede na gibanje trga ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla in širokih varjenih cevi ter stanjem zadevne industrije, ter zato, ker podobni nadzorni sistemi za uvoz jekla zajemajo te izdelke, ustrezno, da ta sistem vključuje izdelke iz Priloge I.
Taking into account the developments mentioned above, and taking into consideration that other major steel producing countries such as Canada and the United States of America have recently decided to extend their similar steel import monitoring systems (extended until 31 August 2011 and 21 March 2013, respectively), it is appropriate that this system should continue until 31 December 2012.
Ob upoštevanju omenjenega razvoja in dejstva, da so druge večje države proizvajalke jekla, kot so Kanada in Združene države Amerike, nedavno sklenile podaljšati veljavnost svojih podobnih nadzornih sistemov (do 31. avgusta 2011 oziroma 21. marca 2013), je primerno ta sistem ohraniti do 31. decembra 2012.
In order to minimise unnecessary constraints and not disturb excessively the activities of companies close to the borders, the net weight of imports that are excluded from the application of this Regulation remains at 2500 kilograms,
Za zmanjšanje nepotrebnih omejitev in da ne bi preveč motili dejavnosti družb blizu meja, je neto teža uvoza, ki je izključen iz uporabe te uredbe, še naprej 2500 kilogramov –
Regulation (EC) No 76/2002 is amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 76/2002 se spremeni:
the scope of the prior surveillance shall be extended to the products listed in Annex I;
obseg predhodnega nadzora se razširi na izdelke iz Priloge I;
in Article 6 delete ‘31 December 2009’ and substitute with ‘31 December 2012’;
v členu 6 se črta „31. decembra 2009“ in nadomesti z „31. decembra 2012“;
the list of competent national authorities shall be replaced by the list in Annex II.
seznam pristojnih nacionalnih organov se nadomesti s seznamom iz Priloge II.
OJ L 84, 31.3.2009, p. 1.
UL L 84, 31.3.2009, str. 1.
OJ L 185, 17.7.2009, p. 1.
UL L 185, 17.7.2009, str. 1.
List of products to be added to the list of products subject to prior surveillance
Izdelki, ki jih je treba dodati na seznam izdelkov, za katere velja predhodni nadzor
Complete CN heading 7305
Celotna tarifna številka KN 7305
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1242/2009
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1242/2009
imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain cargo scanning systems originating in the People’s Republic of China
o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih sistemov za preglede tovora s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (‘the basic Regulation’) [1], and in particular Article 7 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba) [1] in zlasti člena 7 Uredbe,
On 18 March 2009, the European Commission announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] (‘notice of initiation’), the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Community of certain cargo scanning systems originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’).
(1) Evropska komisija je 18. marca 2009 z objavo obvestila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obvestilo o začetku) napovedala začetek protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom v Skupnost nekaterih sistemov za preglede tovora s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (v nadaljnjem besedilu: LRK).
The anti-dumping proceeding was initiated following a complaint lodged on 2 February 2009 by the Community producer Smiths Detection Group Limited (‘the complainant’), representing a major proportion, in this case more than 80 % of the total Community production of certain cargo scanning systems.
Protidampinški postopek se je začel po tem, ko je proizvajalec Skupnosti Smiths Detection Group Limited (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pritožnik), ki predstavlja glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 80 % celotne proizvodnje nekaterih sistemov za preglede tovora v Skupnosti, 2. februarja 2009 vložil pritožbo.
This complaint contained evidence of dumping and of material injury resulting therefrom, which was considered sufficient to justify the opening of a proceeding.
Ta pritožba je vsebovala dokaze o dampingu in z njim povezani znatni škodi, ki so veljali za zadostne, da upravičijo začetek postopka.
The Commission officially advised the complainant, other known producers in the Community, the sole known exporting producer in the PRC, the representatives of the exporting country concerned, and producers in the United States of America (‘USA’), which was envisaged as analogue country.
Komisija se je uradno posvetovala s pritožnikom, drugimi znanimi proizvajalci v Skupnosti, edinim znanim proizvajalcem izvoznikom v LRK, predstavniki zadevne države izvoznice in proizvajalci v Združenih državah Amerike (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ZDA), ki so bile predvidene kot primerljiva država.
In addition, the Commission contacted all known Community users of the product concerned/like product.
Komisija je poleg tega vzpostavila stik z vsemi znanimi uporabniki zadevnega izdelka/podobnega izdelka v Skupnosti.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost pisno izraziti svoja stališča in zahtevati zaslišanje v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
All interested parties who so requested and showed that there were particular reasons why they should be heard were granted a hearing.
Vsem zainteresiranim stranem, ki so zahtevale zaslišanje in dokazale, da zanj obstajajo posebni razlogi, je bilo to odobreno.
In order to allow the sole known exporting producer in the PRC to submit a claim for market economy treatment (‘MET’) or individual treatment (‘IT’), if it so wished, the Commission sent claim forms to the exporting producer known to be concerned and to the authorities of the PRC.
Da bi edini znani proizvajalec izvoznik v LRK lahko predložil zahtevek za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: TGO) ali individualno obravnavo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: IO), če bi tako želel, je Komisija proizvajalcu izvozniku, za katerega je znano, da ga to zadeva, in organom LRK poslala obrazce zahtevkov.
The sole known exporting producer in the PRC did not request MET pursuant to Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation but requested IT.
Edini znani proizvajalec izvoznik v LRK ni zahteval TGO v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe, temveč je zahteval IO.
The Commission sent questionnaires to all parties known to be concerned and to all other parties that requested so within the deadlines set out in the notice of initiation.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike vsem stranem, za katere je bilo znano, da jih to zadeva, in vsem drugim stranem, ki so to zahtevale v rokih iz obvestila o začetku.
Questionnaire replies were received from the sole known Chinese exporting producer, from two Community producers, from one producer in the USA which was envisaged as analogue country and from nine Community users.
Prejeti so bili izpolnjeni vprašalniki edinega znanega kitajskega proizvajalca izvoznika, dveh proizvajalcev Skupnosti, enega proizvajalca v ZDA, ki so bile predvidene kot primerljiva država, in devetih uporabnikov Skupnosti.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for the purpose of MET/IT and for a provisional determination of dumping, resulting injury and Community interest.
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so se ji zdele potrebne za TGO/IO in začasno ugotovitev dampinga, nastale škode in interesa Skupnosti.
Community producers
proizvajalca Skupnosti:
Smiths Heimann SAS, Vitry (France) and Smiths Heimann GmbH, Wiesbaden (Germany), both related companies of Smiths Detection Group Limited
Smiths Heimann SAS, Vitry (Francija), in Smiths Heimann GmbH, Wiesbaden (Nemčija), oba povezani družbi družbe Smiths Detection Group Limited;
Exporting producer in the PRC
proizvajalec izvoznik v LRK:
Nuctech Company Limited, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
Nuctech Company Limited, Beijing, Ljudska republika Kitajska.
In view of the need to establish a normal value for the exporting producer in the PRC which did not claim MET, a verification visit to establish normal value on the basis of data from an analogue country, the USA in this case, took place at the premises of the following company:
Zaradi potrebe po določitvi normalne vrednosti za proizvajalca izvoznika v LRK, ki ni zahteval TGO, je bil preveritveni obisk z namenom določitve normalne vrednosti na podlagi podatkov iz primerljive države, v tem primeru ZDA, opravljen v prostorih naslednje družbe:
Rapiscan Systems Inc., Torrance, CA, USA
Rapiscan Systems Inc., Torrance, CA, ZDA.
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2007 to 31 December 2008 (the ‘investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. julija 2007 do 31. decembra 2008 („obdobje preiskave“ ali OP).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2004 to the end of the IP (‘the period considered’).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2004 do konca OP („obravnavano obdobje“).
With respect to the length of the IP it is noted that the 18-month period was selected due to the specific particularities of the product concerned/like product market, i.e. the existence of public procurement/tendering processes which entail long lead time periods for the materialisation of a transaction and the existence of relatively few transactions.
Glede na dolžino OP se ugotavlja, da je bilo 18-mesečno obdobje izbrano zaradi posebnih značilnosti trga zadevnega izdelka/podobnega izdelka, tj. obstoja postopkov javnih naročil/razpisnih postopkov, zaradi česar so obdobja do uresničitve posla dolga in je uresničenih razmeroma malo poslov.
The product concerned is systems for scanning of cargo, based on the use of neutron technology or based on the use of X-rays with an X-ray source of 250 KeV or more or based on the use of alpha, beta or gamma radiations, currently falling within CN codes ex90221900, ex90222900, ex90278017 and ex90301000 and motor vehicles equipped with such systems currently falling within CN code ex87059090 originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘the product concerned’).
Zadevni izdelek so sistemi za preglede tovora z uporabo nevtronske tehnologije ali rentgenskih žarkov z virom rentgenskega sevanja najmanj 250 KeV ali z uporabo alfa, beta ali gama žarkov, trenutno uvrščeni v oznake KN ex90221900, ex90222900, ex90278017 in ex90301000, ter motorna vozila, opremljena s takimi sistemi, uvrščenimi v oznako KN ex87059090, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („zadevni izdelek“).
Those scanners constitute advanced technology screening systems for monitoring freight.
Ti pregledovalniki so tehnološko napredni pregledovalni sistemi za nadzorovanje tovora.
They help enhancing security and safety by detecting shipments of, inter alia, explosives, weapons, radioactive materials, narcotics, contraband and counterfeited goods.
Pomagajo povečati zaščito in varnost, tako da odkrivajo pošiljke, ki med drugim vključujejo eksplozive, orožje, radioaktivne snovi, mamila, tihotapsko in ponarejeno blago.
They are a key tool for customs administrations and port authorities, as well as for certain air cargo companies and other private actors specialised in safety and security matters, to identify suspect goods in unopened loads transiting by sea, road, air or rail.
So ključno orodje za carinske uprave in pristaniške organe ter nekatere družbe za zračni prevoz tovora in druge zasebne akterje, specializirane za vprašanja varnosti in zaščite, pri odkrivanju sumljivega blaga v neodprtih tovorih, ki se prevažajo po morju, cestah, zraku ali železnici.
The product concerned exists in different configurations depending on the item to be scanned and whether they have to be mobile or static.
Zadevni izdelek obstaja v različnih konfiguracijah, odvisno od tega, kakšen predmet se pregleduje in ali mora biti izdelek premičen ali statičen.
The main configurations are the following: stationary systems (that are permanently installed on a dedicated site), relocatable systems (that are light scanning systems that move on rails and can be relocated), rail systems, mobile systems (that have scanners incorporated in a motor vehicle), pass-through systems and portal systems.
Glavne konfiguracije so: nepremični sistemi (ti so stalno nameščeni na določenem mestu), premestljivi sistemi (to so lahki sistemi za preglede, ki se premikajo po tirih in jih je mogoče premeščati), tirni sistemi, premični sistemi (ti imajo pregledovalnike vključene v motorno vozilo), prehodni sistemi in portalni sistemi.
Within the same configuration, cargo scanning systems share the same general physical, technological and performance characteristics, serve for exactly the same purposes in terms of uses, are sold exclusively to end users and are produced using the same type of equipment.
Sistemi za preglede tovora iz enake konfiguracije imajo enake splošne fizične, tehnološke in storilnostne značilnosti, v smislu uporabe so predvideni za popolnoma enake namene, prodajajo se izključno končnim uporabnikom in so proizvedeni z enako vrsto opreme.
The sole cooperating Chinese exporting producer claimed that the product scope of the product concerned should be radically reduced and should only include a certain part of the X-ray cargo scanning systems, i.e. non-mobile cargo scanning systems based on the use of X-rays (with an X-ray source of more than 450 KeV), excluding cargo scanning systems containing Interlaced Dual-Energy (IDE), binocular stereoscopic (BS) and fast-scan technologies.
Edini sodelujoči kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da bi bilo treba obseg izdelka pri zadevnem izdelku korenito zmanjšati in da bi moral vključevati le določen del sistemov za preglede tovora z rentgenskimi žarki, tj. nepremičnih sistemov za preglede tovora, ki temeljijo na uporabi rentgenskih žarkov (z virom rentgenskih žarkov najmanj 450 KeV), brez sistemov za preglede tovora, ki vsebujejo tehnologijo prepletene dvojne energije (Interlaced Dual-Energy (IDE)), binokularno stereoskopsko tehnologijo (BS) in tehnologijo hitrega skeniranja.
It was submitted that certain technologies are not scientifically or technically suitable for cargo scanners.
Glede na navedbe nekatere tehnologije znanstveno ali tehnično niso primerne za pregledovalnike tovora.
It was argued that, in some cases, technologies, end uses and consumer perception are different.
V nekaterih primerih naj bi bili tehnologije, končne uporabe in potrošnikovo zaznavanje različni.
The company claimed that alpha or beta radiation technologies are not scientifically or technically capable of being used with cargos scanners.
Družba je trdila, da tehnologije z alfa ali beta žarki znanstveno ali tehnično niso primerne za uporabo pri pregledovalnikih tovora.
It also argued that cargo scanners with neutron and gamma technology are not produced within the Community.
Trdila je tudi, da se pregledovalniki tovora z nevtronsko in gama tehnologijo ne proizvajajo v Skupnosti.
Furthermore, it submitted that certain scanners are different (i.e. mobile cargo scanners, cargo scanners with fast-scan technology, cargo scanners with IDE technology and cargo scanners containing BS technology, cargo scanners with a certain energy level) and thus cannot be treated as the product concerned.
Poleg tega je navedla, da so nekateri pregledovalniki drugačni (tj. premični pregledovalniki tovora, pregledovalniki tovora s tehnologijo hitrega skeniranja, pregledovalniki tovora s tehnologijo IDE in pregledovalniki tovora s tehnologijo BS, pregledovalniki tovora z določeno ravnjo energije) in jih tako ni mogoče obravnavati kot zadevni izdelek.
It was finally claimed that certain product types are different and that some product types are not produced in the PRC or the Community
Na koncu je trdila, da so nekatere vrste izdelka drugačne in da se nekatere vrste izdelka ne proizvajajo v LRK ali Skupnosti.
The investigation has shown that all technologies covered by the product scope can be used in cargo scanners and that all product types serve the same purpose which is to scan cargo by using the same main principal feature, i.e. the emission of radiation concentrated in scanning cargo.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je mogoče v pregledovalnikih tovora uporabiti vse tehnologije, zajete v obsegu izdelka, in da se vse vrste izdelka uporabljajo za enak namen, ki je pregledovanje tovora z uporabo enake glavne značilnosti, tj. emisije žarkov, usmerjenih v pregledovanje tovora.
This is the reason why changes in the source or level of energy and also the better suitability of some technologies for specific types of the items to be scanned (e.g. organic items) could not warrant the exclusion of a certain product type.
Iz tega razloga spremembe v viru ali ravni energije in tudi večja primernost nekaterih tehnologij za določene vrste predmetov, ki jih je treba pregledati (na primer organskih predmetov), ne upravičujejo izključitve določene vrste izdelka.
At the same time all product types, irrespectively of technologies, serve to satisfy the same sole aim pursued by the user of the product which is none other than to scan cargo.
Hkrati so vse vrste izdelka, ne glede na tehnologijo, namenjene uresničevanju istega cilja, ki si ga je zadal uporabnik izdelka in ki je pregledovati tovor.
Furthermore, the calls for tender in the European Union typically do not exclude any type of technology, irrespectively of where the corresponding product is produced.
Poleg tega je za javne razpise v Evropski uniji značilno, da ne izključujejo nobene vrste tehnologije, ne glede na to, kje je ustrezni izdelek proizveden.
It also appears that alpha and beta radiation technologies can be used for scanning certain type of cargo.
Zdi se tudi, da je tehnologijo z alfa in beta žarki mogoče uporabiti za pregledovanje nekaterih vrst tovora.
In respect to product types not produced in the European Union, it is noted that this is not relevant as such.
Glede vrst izdelkov, ki niso proizvedene v Evropski uniji, se ugotavlja, da to kot tako ni pomembno.