natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
for each Member State and for each of the risk categories whose respective NRV is higher than the corresponding CST, the CST shall represent the maximum tolerable level of the risk to which it refers.
za vsako državo članico in vsako kategorijo tveganja, katere NRV je višja od ustreznega SVC, predstavlja SVC najvišjo dovoljeno raven tveganja, na katero se nanaša.
The assessment of achievement of the CST shall be carried out in compliance with the requirements deriving from the impact assessment and, where applicable, the timetable for gradual implementation of the CST, according to Article 7(3) of Directive 2004/49/EC.
Doseganje SVC se oceni v skladu z zahtevami, ki izhajajo iz ocene učinka, in po potrebi s časovnim okvirom za postopno izvajanje SVC ob upoštevanju člena 7(3) Direktive 2004/49/ES.
For each Member State, and for each of the risk categories, the assessment of achievement of the NRV and CST shall be carried out annually by the Agency, taking into consideration the most recent four preceding reported years.
Za vsako državo članico in vsako kategorijo tveganja mora Agencija vsako leto oceniti doseganje NRV in SVC, pri čemer je treba upoštevati zadnja štiri poročevalna leta.
No later than 31 March each year the Agency shall report to the Commission on the overall results of the assessment of achievement of NRVs and CSTs.
Agencija mora vsako leto najpozneje do 31. marca Komisiji poročati o skupnih rezultatih ocene doseganja NRV in SVC.
Taking into account the provisions laid down in point 1.1.3, from 2012 onwards the assessment of achievement of the NRVs and CSTs shall be carried out annually by the Agency taking into consideration the most recent five preceding reported years.
Glede na določbe iz točke 1.1.3 Agencija od leta 2012 naprej vsako leto oceni doseganje NRV in SVC, pri čemer upošteva zadnjih pet poročevalnih let.
The outcome of the assessment of achievement referred to in point 3.1.1 shall be classified as follows:
Rezultati ocene doseganja iz točke 3.1.1 se opredelijo na naslednji način:
acceptable safety performance;
sprejemljiva raven varnosti;
possible deterioration of safety performance;
možnost znižanja ravni varnosti;
probable deterioration of safety performance.
verjetnost znižanja ravni varnosti.
Stepwise description of the procedure referred to in point 3.1.1(a)
Postopen opis postopka iz točke 3.1.1(a)
The procedure for the assessment of achievement of NRVs is composed of four different steps as described in the following points.
Postopek za oceno doseganja NRV obsega štiri različne korake, ki so opisani v naslednjih točkah.
The overall decisional flowchart of the procedure is shown in Appendix 2, where positive and negative decisional arrows correspond respectively to a ‘passed’ and a ‘failed’ result of the different assessment steps.
Celoten prikaz delovnih postopkov za odločanje je prikazan v Dodatku 2, pri čemer puščice z DA in NE ustrezajo pozitivnim in negativnim rezultatom različnih korakov ocenjevanja.
The first assessment step shall verify whether the observed safety performance is complying with the NRV or not.
S prvim korakom ocenjevanja se preveri, ali je ugotovljena raven varnosti skladna z NRV ali ne.
The observed safety performance shall be measured by using the measurement units listed in Appendix 1 and the data referred to in section 1.1, with time series which shall include the most recent years of observations as specified in section 3.1.
Ugotovljena raven varnosti se izmeri z uporabo merskih enot iz Dodatka 1 in podatkov iz oddelka 1.1, skupaj s časovnimi vrstami, ki vključujejo zadnja leta opazovanja, kot določa oddelek 3.1.
The observed safety performance shall be expressed in terms of:
Ugotovljena raven varnosti mora biti izražena v smislu:
safety performance observed in the single most recent reported year;
ugotovljene ravni varnosti v zadnjem poročevalnem letu,
moving weighted average (MWA), as specified in section 3.3.
tehtanega drsečega povprečja (MWA), kot je opredeljeno v oddelku 3.3.
The values returned by applying points (a) and (b) shall then be compared with the NRV, and if one of these values does not exceed the NRV the safety performance shall be considered acceptable.
Rezultati uporabe točk (a) in (b) se nato primerjajo z NRV in če nobena od teh vrednosti ne presega NRV, velja raven varnosti za sprejemljivo.
If this is not the case, the procedure shall continue with the second assessment step.
V nasprotnem primeru se postopek nadaljuje z drugim korakom ocenjevanja.
The second assessment step shall consider the safety performance as acceptable if the MWA does not exceed the NRV plus a 20 % range of tolerance.
Z drugim korakom ocenjevanja se raven varnosti oceni kot sprejemljiva, če tehtano drseče povprečje ne presega NRV, ki se ji doda 20-odstotni razpon dovoljenega odstopanja.
If this condition is not satisfied, the Agency shall ask the safety authority of the Member State concerned to provide the specifics of the single highest-consequence accident (in terms of FWSIs) in the most recent years of observation as referred to in section 3.1, excluding the years used to set the NRV.
Če ta pogoj ni izpolnjen, mora Agencija prositi varnostni organ zadevne države članice, da navede posebnosti nesreče z največjimi posledicami (v smislu smrtnih primerov in težkih poškodb) v zadnjih letih opazovanja, kot je navedeno v oddelku 3.1, razen v letih, ki so se uporabila za določitev NRV.
If this single accident is more severe, in terms of consequences, than the most severe single accident included in the data used for setting the NRV, it shall be excluded from the statistics.
Če ima ta nesreča hujše posledice kot najhujša nesreča, vključena v podatke, na podlagi katerih se določi NRV, jo je treba izključiti iz statističnih podatkov.
The MWA is then recalculated to check whether it lies within the abovementioned range of tolerance.
Nato se tehtano drseče povprečje izračuna ponovno, da se preveri, ali spada v naveden razpon dovoljenega odstopanja.
If this is the case, the safety performance shall be considered acceptable.
V tem primeru velja raven varnosti za sprejemljivo.
If this is not the case, the procedure shall continue with the third assessment step.
V nasprotnem primeru se postopek nadaljuje s tretjim korakom ocenjevanja.
The third assessment step shall verify whether it is the first time in the last 3 years that the second assessment step did not return evidence of acceptable safety performance.
S tretjim korakom ocenjevanja se preveri, ali se je v obdobju treh let prvič zgodilo, da se z drugim korakom niso zagotovili dokazi o sprejemljivi ravni varnosti.
If this is the case, the outcome of the third assessment step shall be classified as ‘passed’.
V tem primeru velja rezultat tretjega koraka ocenjevanja za pozitivnega.
The procedure shall continue with the fourth step, whatever the outcome of the third step may be.
Postopek se ne glede na rezultat tretjega koraka nadaljuje s četrtim korakom.
The fourth assessment step shall verify whether the number of significant accidents per train-km, with respect to the previous years, remained stable (or decreased).
S četrtim korakom ocenjevanja se preveri, ali je število hudih nesreč na vlakovni kilometer glede na prejšnja leta ostalo enako (ali se je zmanjšalo).
The criteria for this appraisal shall be whether there has been a statistically significant increase in the number of relevant significant accidents per train-km.
Pri merilih za to oceno se upošteva, ali se je število hudih nesreč na vlakovni kilometer v statističnem smislu znatno povečalo.
This shall be evaluated by using an upper Poisson tolerance bound which will determine the acceptable variability based on the number of accidents that occurred in the different Member States.
To se oceni z uporabo Poissonove zgornje meje dovoljenega odstopanja, s katero se določi sprejemljiva spremenljivost, ki temelji na številu nesreč v različnih državah članicah.
If the number of significant accidents per train-km does not exceed the abovementioned tolerance bound, it is assumed that there has not been a statistically significant increase, and the outcome of this assessment step shall be classified as ‘passed’.
Če število hudih nesreč na vlakovni kilometer ne presega navedene meje dovoljenega odstopanja, se šteje, da se število hudih nesreč v statističnem smislu ni zelo povečalo in da mora rezultat tega koraka ocenjevanja veljati za pozitivnega.
Depending on the risk category to which the different NRVs under assessment of achievement refer, the significant accidents to be considered for carrying out this assessment step are as follows:
Glede na kategorijo tveganja, na katero se nanašajo različne NRV v okviru ocene doseganja, se pri tem koraku ocenjevanja upoštevajo naslednje hude nesreče:
risks to passengers: all relevant significant accidents;
tveganje za potnike: vse pomembne hude nesreče;
risks to staff or employees, including the staff of contractors: all relevant significant accidents;
tveganje za osebje ali zaposlene, vključno z osebjem izvajalcev: vse pomembne hude nesreče;
risks to level crossing users: all relevant significant accidents included in the category ‘accidents involving level crossings’;
tveganje za uporabnike nivojskih prehodov: vse pomembne hude nesreče, ki spadajo v kategorijo „nesreče na nivojskih prehodih“;
risks to unauthorised persons on railway premises: all relevant significant accidents included in the category ‘accidents to persons caused by rolling stock in motion’;
tveganje za nepooblaščene osebe v železniških prostorih: vse pomembne hude nesreče, vključene v kategorijo „nesreče oseb, ki jih povzročijo premikajoča se železniška vozna sredstva“;
risks to others: all relevant significant accidents;
tveganje za druge osebe: vse pomembne hude nesreče;
risk to society as a whole: all significant accidents.
tveganje za družbo kot celoto: vse hude nesreče.
Moving weighted averaging process for the annual assessment of achievement of NRVs
Postopek določanja tehtanega drsečega povprečja za letno oceno doseganja NRV
For each Member State and for each of the risk categories to which the Moving Weighted Averaging (MWA) is applied for carrying out, in each year Y (starting from Y = 2010 onwards), the assessment steps described in section 3.2, the following phases shall be applied for calculating the MWAY:
Za vsako državo članico in vsako kategorijo tveganja, za katero se pri izvajanju korakov ocenjevanja, opisanih v oddelku 3.2, vsako leto Y (od začetnega leta Y = 2010 naprej) uporabi tehtano drseče povprečje (MWA), je treba pri izračunu MWAY upoštevati naslednje stopnje:
calculation of the annual observations OBSi returned by the corresponding indicators listed in Appendix 1, after providing as input the data available from the sources referred to in section 1.1 for the relevant years (the index i takes the values as defined in the formula below);
izračun letnih opazovanj OBSi z ustreznimi kazalniki iz Dodatka 1 po zagotovitvi podatkov, ki so za ustrezna leta na voljo v virih iz oddelka 1.1 (znak i pomeni vrednosti, kot so opredeljene v spodnji formuli);
calculation of the arithmetic n-year average (AV) of annual observations OBSi [initially n = 4; from 2012 onwards n = 5];
izračun aritmetičnega povprečja (AV) letnih opazovanj OBSi za leto n [na začetku je n = 4; od leta 2012 naprej je n = 5];
calculation of the weight Wi, by taking the inverse of ABSDIFFi;
izračun teže Wi z uporabo obratne vrednosti ABSDIFFi;
calculation of the MWAY as follows:
izračun MWAY:
if Y = 2010 or 2011: x = Y – 5; N = Y – 2
if Y = 2010 ali 2011: x = Y – 5; N = Y – 2
of 12 June 2009
z dne 12. junija 2009
Pursuant to Article 65 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, the Management Board of the European Medicine Agency (hereinafter ‘the Agency’) is to include two representatives of the Commission.
V skladu s členom 65 Uredbe (ES) št. 726/2004 mora uprava Evropske agencije za zdravila (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) vključevati dva predstavnika Komisije.
Due to the expiry on 2 June 2009 of the current mandate of the Commission representative and alternate from the Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry, it is necessary to appoint a member of the Management Board of the Agency from the Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry and an alternate who will replace the member in his/her absence and vote on his/her behalf,
Ker se 2. junija 2009 izteče sedanji mandat predstavnika Komisije in namestnika iz Generalnega direktorata za podjetništvo in industrijo, je treba imenovati člana uprave Agencije iz Generalnega direktorata za podjetništvo in industrijo ter namestnika, ki bo člana v njegovi odsotnosti nadomeščal in glasoval v njegovem imenu –
Director-General of the Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry.
generalni direktor Generalnega direktorata za podjetništvo in industrijo.
Director heading the Directorate which is responsible for the authorisation of medicinal products on the basis of the work program of the Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry.
direktor na čelu Direktorata, ki je pristojen za odobritev zdravil na podlagi delovnega programa Generalnega direktorata za podjetništvo in industrijo.
The Director-General of the Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry shall inform the Executive Director of the European Medicines Agency of the names of the persons occupying the positions referred to in Article 1, and any changes thereof.
Generalni direktor Generalnega direktorata za podjetništvo in industrijo izvršnemu direktorju Evropske agencije za zdravila sporoči imena oseb, ki zasedajo položaje iz člena 1, in kakršne koli spremembe imen.
Done at Brussels, 12 June 2009.
V Bruslju, 12. junija 2009
derogating from point 1(d) of the Annex to Decision 2006/133/EC, as amended by Decision 2009/420/EC, as regards the date of application in relation to susceptible wood originating outside the demarcated areas
o odstopanju od točke 1(d) Priloge k Odločbi 2006/133/ES, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo 2009/420/ES, glede datuma začetka veljavnosti v zvezi z občutljivim lesom s poreklom zunaj razmejenih območij
(notified under document number C(2009) 4515)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 4515)
That Decision introduced in Commission Decision 2006/133/EC [3], as from 16 June 2009, the obligation that susceptible wood packaging material not originating from the demarcated areas undergoes one of the approved treatments specified in Annex I to FAO International Standard for Phytosanitary measures No 15 and is marked according to Annex II to the said Standard before being moved from the demarcated areas to other areas in Member States or in third countries as well as from part of the demarcated area in which the pine wood nematode is known to occur to the part of the demarcated area designated as a buffer zone.
S to Odločbo je bila v Odločbi Komisije 2006/133/ES [3] uvedena obveznost, da se od 16. junija 2009 občutljiva lesena embalaža, ki ne izvira iz razmejenih območij, obdela po enem od potrjenih postopkov iz Priloge I k Mednarodnemu standardu za fitosanitarne ukrepe št. 15 FAO in se označi v skladu s Prilogo II navedenega standarda, preden se premesti iz razmejenega območja na druga območja v državah članicah ali tretjih državah ter iz dela razmejenega območja, v katerem je znan pojav borove ogorčice, v del razmejenega območja, določen kot varovalni pas.
Wood packaging material is required for the transport of many goods of all kinds.
Lesena embalaža se zahteva za prevoz številnih vrst blaga.
However, until now the production and use of susceptible wood packaging material treated and marked in accordance with the Annexes I and II to FAO International Standard for Phytosanitary measures No 15 is not generalised in the Community.
Vendar doslej proizvodnja in uporaba občutljive lesene embalaže, obdelane in označene v skladu s prilogama I in II Mednarodnega standarda za fitosanitarne ukrepe št. 15 FAO v Skupnosti nista splošno razširjena.
It appears in particular that not enough wood packaging material complying with the FAO International Standard for Phytosanitary measures No 15 can be made available at short time to cover the needs of the economic operators trading goods from Portugal to other Member States or third countries.
Zlasti se zdi, da ni dovolj lesene embalaže, ki bi ustrezala Mednarodnem standardu za fitosanitarne ukrepe št. 15 FAO in bila lahko v kratkem času na razpolago za pokritje potreb gospodarskih subjektov, ki trgujejo z blagom iz Portugalske v druge države članice ali tretje države.
To avoid risks of disproportionate disruption of trade, it appears necessary to provide for a derogation as regards the date of application of the requirements set out in Decision 2006/133/EC, as amended by Decision 2009/420/EC, which refer to the obligation to treat and mark in accordance with Annexes I and II to FAO International Standard for Phytosanitary measures No 15 susceptible wood packaging material not originating from demarcated areas before moving it from the demarcated areas in Portugal to other areas.
Da bi se izognili tveganju nesorazmernih motenj trgovine, se zdi potrebno določiti odstopanje v zvezi z datumom začetka veljavnosti zahtev iz Odločbe 2006/133/ES, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo 2009/420/ES, ki se nanaša na obveznost, da se občutljiva lesena embalaža, ki ne izvira iz razmejenih območij, pred premestitvijo iz razmejenih območij na Portugalskem na druga območja obdela in označi v skladu s prilogama I in II k Mednarodnemu standardu za fitosanitarne ukrepe št. 15 FAO.
Point 1(d) of the Annex to Decision 2006/133/EC, as amended by Decision 2009/420/EC, shall not apply to susceptible wood originating outside the demarcated areas.
Točka 1(d) Priloge k Odločbi 2006/133/ES, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo 2009/420/ES, se ne uporablja za občutljiv les s poreklom zunaj razmejenih območij.
This Decision shall apply from 16 June 2009 until 31 December 2009.
Ta odločba se uporablja od 16. junija 2009 do 31. decembra 2009.
OJ L 135, 30.5.2009, p. 29.
UL L 135, 30.5.2009, str. 29.
On 28 May 2009, the Commission adopted Decision 2009/420/EC amending Decision 2006/133/EC requiring Member States temporarily to take additional measures against the dissemination of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner et Buhrer) Nickle et al. (the pine wood nematode) as regards areas in Portugal, other than those in which it is known not to occur [2].
Komisija je 28. maja 2009 sprejela Odločbo 2009/420/ES o spremembi Odločbe 2006/133/ES o zahtevi, da države članice začasno sprejmejo dodatne ukrepe proti širjenju borove ogorčice Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner in Buhrer) Nickle et al. na območjih Portugalske razen območij, kjer je znano, da se ne pojavlja [2].
on a Community Position concerning a Decision of the EU-Albania Stabilisation and Association Council adopting its Rules of Procedure including the Rules of Procedure of the Stabilisation and Association Committee
o stališču Skupnosti glede Sklepa Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega sveta EU-Albanija o sprejetju svojega poslovnika, vključno s poslovnikom Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega odbora
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo,
Having regard to Council and Commission Decision of 26 February 2009 on the conclusion of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Albania, of the other part [1], of the other part, and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta in Komisije z dne 26. februarja 2009 o sklenitvi Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega sporazuma med Evropskima skupnostma in njunimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Albanijo na drugi strani [1], in zlasti člena 2(1) Sklepa,
Article 116 of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Albania, of the other part [2] (hereinafter referred to as ‘Agreement’) establishes a Stabilisation and Association Council.
Člen 116 Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega sporazuma med Evropskima skupnostma in njunimi državami članicami na eni strani in Republiko Albanijo na drugi strani [2] ( v nadaljevanju „Sporazum“) ustanavlja Stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni svet.
Article 117(2) of the Agreement provides that the Stabilisation and Association Council shall establish its own rules of procedure.
Člen 117(2) Sporazuma določa, da bo Stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni svet sprejel svoj poslovnik.
Article 120(1) of the Agreement provides that the Stabilisation and Association Council in the performance of its duties shall be assisted by a Stabilisation and Association Committee.
Člen 120(1) Sporazuma določa, da bo Stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni odbor pomagal Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenemu svetu pri opravljanju njegovih nalog.
Article 120(2) and (3) of the Agreement provides that the Stabilisation and Association Council shall, in its rules of procedure, determine the duties of the Stabilisation and Association Committee and that the Stabilisation and Association Council may delegate any of its powers to the Stabilisation and Association Committee,
Člen 120(2) in (3) Sporazuma določa, da bo Stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni svet v svojem poslovniku določil naloge Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega odbora in da lahko Stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni svet prenese svoja pooblastila na Stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni odbor –
The position to be adopted by the Community within the Stabilisation and Association Council established by the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Albania, of the other part, in relation to the rules of procedure of the said Stabilisation and Association Council and to the delegation of its powers to the Stabilisation and Association Committee shall be based on the draft decision of the Stabilisation and Association Council, attached to this Decision.
Stališče, ki ga sprejema Skupnost v okviru Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega sveta, ustanovljenega s Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenim sporazumom med Evropskima skupnostma in njunimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Albanijo na drugi strani, v zvezi s poslovnikom navedenega stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega sveta in prenosom njegovih pooblastil na Stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni odbor, temelji na osnutku sklepa Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega sveta, priloženega k temu sklepu.
Minor amendments to this draft decision may be accepted without further decision of the Council and of the Commission.
Brez nadaljnjih sklepov Sveta in Komisije se lahko sprejmejo manjše spremembe k temu osnutku sklepa.
OJ L 107, 28.4.2009, p. 165.
UL L 107, 28.4.2009, str. 165.
DECISION No 1 OF THE EU-ALBANIA STABILISATION AND ASSOCIATION COUNCIL
SKLEP št. 1 STABILIZACIJSKO-PRIDRUŽITVENEGA SVETA EU-ALBANIJA
Having regard to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Albania [1] (hereinafter referred to as ‘Albania’), of the other part, and in particular Articles 116 and 117 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega sporazuma med Evropskima skupnostma in njunimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Albanijo [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Albanija) na drugi strani in zlasti členov 116 in 117 Sporazuma,
Whereas that Agreement entered into force on 1 April 2009,
ob upoštevanju, da je Sporazum začel veljati 1. aprila 2009 –
The Stabilisation and Association Council shall be presided over alternately for periods of 12 months by a representative of the Council of the European Union, on behalf of the Communities and their Member States, and by a representative of the Government of Albania.
Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenemu svetu v obdobjih 12 mesecev izmenično predsedujeta predstavnik Sveta Evropske unije v imenu Skupnosti in njunih držav članic ter predstavnik vlade Albanije.