natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is therefore concluded that the possible limited advantages to be enjoyed by users and importers of PSF in the Community if duties were to be repealed, would clearly be disproportionate compared to the serious disadvantages to the Community industry.
Zato se sklene, da bi bile morebitne omejene ugodnosti za uporabnike in uvoznike rezanih poliestrskih vlaken v Skupnosti, če bi se dajatve ukinile, očitno nesorazmerne z resnimi pomanjkljivostmi za industrijo Skupnosti.
Accordingly, it can be concluded that termination of the existing measures on imports from the countries concerned on Community interest grounds would not be justified.
V skladu s tem se lahko sklene, da odprave obstoječih ukrepov na uvoz iz zadevnih držav ni mogoče utemeljiti na podlagi interesov Skupnosti.
I. APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF NON-DISCRIMINATION
I. UPORABA NAČELA NEDISKRIMINACIJE
It has been put forward by a number of interested parties that anti-dumping measures may not be imposed on a discriminatory basis, as stated in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation which provides that ‘an anti-dumping duty shall be imposed in the appropriate amounts in each case, on a non-discriminatory basis on imports of a product from all sources found to be dumped and causing injury, […]’.
Veliko zainteresiranih strank je predložilo izjavo, da se protidampinški ukrepi ne smejo uvesti na diskriminatorni osnovi, kot navaja člen 9(5) osnovne uredbe: „V vsakem primeru se proti dumpinška dajatev uvede v obliki ustreznih zneskov na nepristranski osnovi za uvoz izdelka iz vseh virov, za katere se izkaže, da so dumpinški in da povzročajo škodo, …“.
It has been indicated as well that this principle of non-discrimination is also a fundamental principle of WTO law.
Prav tako je bilo navedeno, da je to načelo nediskriminacije tudi temeljno načelo zakonodaje STO.
According to the interested parties that invoke the application of the principle of non-discrimination, imports of PSF from Taiwan and Malaysia were found to have been dumped and causing injury in Regulation (EC) No 2005/2006.
Po mnenju zainteresiranih strank, ki se sklicujejo na uporabo načela nediskriminacije, je bilo za uvoz RVP iz Tajvana in Malezije v Uredbi (ES) št. 2005/2006 ugotovljeno, da je dampinški in da povzroča škodo.
It has been claimed that ‘the reason why these two sources of PSF imports were not subject to anti-dumping duties is not that the Commission would have subsequently found that imports of PSF from Malaysia and Taiwan were not dumped or were not causing injury […]’.
Navedle so, da „razlog, zakaj se za ta dva vira uvoza RVP niso uvedle protidampinške dajatve, ni ta, da bi Komisija naknadno ugotovila, da uvoz RVP iz Malezije in Tajvana ni dampinški ali ne povzroča škode …“.
Furthermore, it has been argued that the Commission’s Decision not to continue to impose anti-dumping measures on imports of PSF from Malaysia and Taiwan from 22 June 2007 despite the fact that these imports were found to be dumped and causing injury has the effect of invalidating the continued imposition of anti-dumping duties on imports of PSF from other countries.
Poleg tega se je trdilo, da ima odločitev Komisije, da od 22. junija 2007 ne bo več izvajala protidampinških ukrepov na uvoz RVP iz Malezije in Tajvana kljub temu, da je bilo za ta uvoz ugotovljeno, da je dampinški in povzroča škodo, učinek razveljavitve nadaljnjega izvajanja protidampinških dajatev na uvoz RVP iz drugih držav.
First, it is underlined that in the case of Malaysia and Taiwan the complaint was withdrawn and that no definitive finding was made by the Council as to the adequacy of imposing anti-dumping duties.
Prvič, poudarja se, da je bila pritožba v primeru Malezije in Tajvana umaknjena ter da Svet ni oblikoval nobene dokončne ugotovitve v zvezi z ustreznostjo uvedbe protidampinških dajatev.
As a result, there is no discrimination.
Zato ni nobene diskriminacije.
Second, the nature of the legal tests regarding Community interest under Articles 9(1) (applicable in the Taiwan and Malaysia case) and 21 (applicable in the current case) of the basic Regulation is different.
Drugič, značaja pravnih preskusov glede interesa Skupnosti iz člena 9(1) (ki se uporablja za primer uvoza iz Tajvana in Malezije) in člena 21 (ki se uporablja za sedanji primer) osnovne uredbe se razlikujeta.
Under the former, the test is whether the balance of interests at hand is so positive that the Commission should continue the proceedings ex officio even in the absence of a supported complaint.
V prvem primeru preskus preverja, ali je ravnovesje zadevnih interesov tako pozitivno, da mora Komisija nadaljevati s postopki po uradni dolžnosti tudi ob odsotnosti podprte pritožbe.
Under the latter, the test is whether the balance of interests is so negative that measures should be terminated.
V drugem primeru pa preskus preverja, ali je ravnovesje interesov tako negativno, da je treba ukrepe ukiniti.
Therefore, the different nature of the tests implies that there can be no discrimination.
Različen značaj preskusov tako kaže, da diskriminacija ni mogoča.
Third, even in the hypothetical situation of a definitive decision taken by the Council concerning a non-imposition of anti-dumping duties on imports of PSF originating in Malaysia and Taiwan, there would be no discrimination in this case, given that the said principle is applicable only if similar conclusions are reached for different investigations concerning the same product.
Tretjič, tudi če bi Svet hipotetično sprejel dokončno odločitev glede neuvedbe protidampinških dajatev na uvoz RVP iz Malezije in Tajvana, v tem primeru ne bi bilo diskriminacije, ker se navedeno načelo uporablja le, če se oblikujejo podobni sklepi za različne preiskave glede istega izdelka.
In other words, compliance with the principle of non-discrimination as set out in Article 9(5) the basic Regulation and Article 9(2) of the WTO Anti-dumping agreement requires that comparable situations must not be treated differently, and that different situations must not be treated in the same way.
Z drugimi besedami, skladnost z načelom nediskriminacije, kakor je določeno v členu 9(5) osnovne uredbe in členu 9(2) protidampinškega sporazuma STO, zahteva enako obravnavo primerljivih situacij in različno obravnavo različnih situacij.
As explained above, the facts and conclusions in the present investigation are radically different from the facts and conclusions in the case of Malaysia and Taiwan and, consequently, the two situations are not comparable.
Kakor je pojasnjeno zgoraj, so dejstva in zaključki sedanje preiskave bistveno drugačni od dejstev in zaključkov v primeru Malezije in Tajvana, zato teh dveh situacij ni mogoče primerjati.
Having regard to the above the claims put forward in relation to the application of the principle of non-discrimination are rejected.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega se trditve v zvezi z uporabo načela nediskriminacije zavrnejo.
On the basis of the above facts and considerations, it is concluded that, in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the interim review should be terminated and the existing anti-dumping duties imposed on imports of PSF produced and exported to the European Community by the countries concerned should be maintained,
Na podlagi navedenih dejstev in premislekov se sklene, da je treba v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe vmesni pregled zaključiti, obstoječe protidampinške dajatve na uvoz RVP, ki jih zadevne države proizvajajo in izvažajo v Evropsko skupnost, pa ohraniti –
The partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable on imports of synthetic staple fibres of polyesters (PSF) originating in Belarus, the Republic of Korea, Saudi Arabia and the People’s Republic of China normally declared under CN code 55032000, is hereby terminated without amending the anti-dumping measures in force.
Delni vmesni pregled protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz sintetičnih rezanih vlaken iz poliestra (RVP) iz Belorusije, Republike Koreje, Saudove Arabije in Ljudske republike Kitajske, običajno uvrščen pod oznako KN 55032000, se s tem zaključi, ne da bi se spremenili veljavni protidampinški ukrepi.
Case T-221/05.
Zadeva T-221/05.
OJ L 160, 21.6.2007, p. 30.
UL L 160, 21.6.2007, str. 30.
OJ C 202, 30.8.2007, p. 4.
UL C 202, 30.8.2007, str. 4.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2005/2006 of 22 December 2006 imposing provisional anti-dumping duties on imports of synthetic staple fibres of polyesters (PSF) originating in Malaysia and Taiwan (OJ L 379, 28.12.2006, p. 65).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2005/2006 z dne 22. decembra 2006 o uvedbi začasnih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz sintetičnih rezanih vlaken iz poliestra (RVP) s poreklom iz Malezije in Tajvana (UL L 379, 28.12.2006, str. 65).
See footnote 8.
Glej opombo 1 na strani 8.
CIRFS (The International Rayon and Synthetic Fibres Committee, the representative body for the European man-made fibre industry) and IVC (Industrievereinigung Chemiefaser e.V., Association of the German and Austrian Man-Made Fibres Industries).
CIRFS („Mednarodni odbor za rajonska in sintetična vlakna“, predstavniški organ za evropsko industrijo umetnih vlaken) in IVC (Industrievereinigung Chemiefaser e.V., Združenje nemške in avstrijske industrije na področju umetnih vlaken).
Profitability for companies with start-up operations which take place within or during part of the investigation period has not been taken into account to avoid potential distortions in the figures.
Donosnost za podjetja z zagonskimi dejavnostmi, ki potekajo v celotnem ali delnem obdobju preiskave, ni bila upoštevana pri preprečevanju mogočega izkrivljanja podatkov.
In 2005 one Community producer went bankrupt in the UK but new plants based in Poland and Romania have offset the loss of production and employment entailed by this bankruptcy.
Leta 2005 je šel v stečaj en proizvajalec Skupnosti v Združenem kraljestvu, vendar sta nova obrata na Poljskem in v Romuniji pokrila izgubo v proizvodnji in zaposlovanju, ki jo je povzročil ta stečaj.
Libeltex, ORV, PGI Nonwovens, Ziegler, Tharreau, Sandler, Frankenstolz, Lück, TWE Vliesstoffwerke and IMP Comfort.
Libeltex, ORV, PGI Nonwovens, Ziegler, Tharreau, Sandler, Frankenstolz, Lück, TWE Vliestoffwerke in IMP Comfort.
Source: Eurostat.
Vir: EUROSTAT.
It has also been put forward by an association of producers that there has been a sharp increase in prices in June 2008 compared to June 2007.
Prav tako je združenje proizvajalcev predložilo izjavo, da so se junija 2008 v primerjavi z junijem 2007 cene močno zvišale.
This sharp increase corresponds to prices in dollars but if we consider prices in EUR they have remained stable.
To zvišanje velja za cene v dolarjih, če pa upoštevamo cene v EUR, so ostale nespremenjene.
Globally, imports have therefore increased from approximately 370 KT to approximately 400 KT over the period.
Globalno se je zato uvoz v zadevnem obdobju povečal s približno 370 kt na približno 400 kt.
If one uses the investigation period of the previous investigation as a starting point, the increase has been from approximately 380 KT to approximately 400 KT.
Če se kot izhodišče uporabi obdobje prejšnje preiskave, se je uvoz povečal s približno 380 kt na 400 kt.
Capacity Community industry HCS
Zmogljivost industrije Skupnosti za HCS
Price HCS 000 EUR/tonne
Cena HCS '000 EUR/tono
The Community industry has been able to increase its market share by almost 5 percentage points during the period considered. However, this increase took place in a period where consumption decreased by more than 1 %.
Industriji Skupnosti je v zadevnem obdobju uspelo povečati tržni delež za skoraj 5 odstotnih točk Vendar je do tega povečanja prišlo v obdobju, ko se je poraba zmanjšala za več kot 1 %.
Moreover, Korean exports are subject to anti-dumping duties ranging between 0 % and 24,6 % in Japan, Turkey, Pakistan and the USA. If the measures in question, as outlined in recital (4), are repealed, the European Union will be the one of most important markets of some size for which exports from the PRC and Korea would not be subject to anti-dumping measures.
Za izvoz iz Koreje veljajo protidampinške dajatve v višini 0 % do 24,6 % na Japonskem, v Turčiji, v Pakistanu in v ZDA, Če se zadevni ukrepi, kakor so opisani v uvodni izjavi 4, razveljavijo, bo Evropska unija eden najpomembnejših trgov določene velikosti, na katerem se za izvoz iz LRK in Koreje ne bodo uporabljali protidampinški ukrepi.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 894/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 894/2008
This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 September 2008.
Ta uredba začne veljati 16. septembra 2008.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 895/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 895/2008
amending, for the thirteenth time, Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 imposing certain restrictive measures in support of effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
o trinajsti spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1763/2004 o uvedbi določenih omejevalnih ukrepov v podporo učinkovitemu izvajanju mandata Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča za nekdanjo Jugoslavijo (MKSJ)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 imposing certain restrictive measures in support of effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), and in particular Article 10(a) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1763/2004 o uvedbi določenih omejevalnih ukrepov v podporo učinkovitemu izvajanju mandata Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča za nekdanjo Jugoslavijo (MKSJ) in zlasti člena 10(a),
The Commission is empowered to amend that Annex, taking into account Council Decisions implementing Common Position 2004/694/CFSP on further measures in support of the effective implementation of the mandate of ICTY.
Komisija je pooblaščena, da spremeni zadevno Prilogo ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta o izvajanju skupnega stališča 2004/694/SZVP o nadaljnjih ukrepih v podporo učinkovitemu izvajanju mandata MKSJ.
Council Decision 2008/733/CFSP of 15 September 2008 implements that Common Position.
Sklep Sveta 2008/733/SZVP iz 15. septembra 2008 izvaja navedeno skupno stališče.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 896/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 896/2008
fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 September 2008
o določitvi uvoznih dajatev v sektorju žit, ki se uporabljajo od 16. septembra 2008
Import duties should be fixed for the period from 16 September 2008 and should apply until new import duties are fixed and enter into force.
Uvozne dajatve, ki se uporabljajo, dokler ne začne veljati nova določitev, se določijo za obdobje z začetkom 16. septembra 2008.
From 16 September 2008, the import duties in the cereals sector referred to in Article 136(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 shall be those fixed in Annex I to this Regulation on the basis of the information contained in Annex II.
Od 16. septembra 2008 so uvozne dajatve v sektorju žit iz člena 136(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 dajatve, določene v Prilogi I k tej uredbi na podlagi podatkov, navedenih v Prilogi II.
Import duties on the products referred to in Article 136(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 applicable from 16 September 2008
Uvozne dajatve za proizvode iz člena 136(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007, ki se uporabljajo od 16. septembra 2008
Commission Regulation (EC) No 897/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 897/2008
This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 September 2008.
Ta uredba začne veljati 17. septembra 2008.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 898/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 898/2008
amending Regulation (EC) No 896/2008 fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 September 2008
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 896/2008 o določitvi uvoznih dajatev v sektorju žit od 16. septembra 2008
The import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 September 2008 were fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 896/2008 [3].
Uvozne dajatve v sektorju žit, ki se uporabljajo od 16. septembra 2008, so bile določene z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 896/2008 [3].
As the average of the import duties calculated differs by more than EUR 5/tonne from that fixed, a corresponding adjustment must be made to the import duties fixed by Regulation (EC) No 896/2008.
Ker izračunano povprečje uvoznih dajatev za 5 EUR/t odstopa od določene dajatve, je potrebna prilagoditev uvoznih dajatev, določenih v Uredbi (ES) št. 896/2008.
Regulation (EC) No 896/2008 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Uredbo (ES) št. 896/2008 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Annexes I and II to Regulation (EC) No 896/2008 are hereby replaced by the text in the Annex to this Regulation.
Prilogi I in II k Uredbi (ES) št. 896/2008 se nadomestita z besedilom iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
It shall apply from 17 September 2008.
Uporablja se od 17. septembra 2008.
OJ L 247, 16.9.2008, p. 20.
UL L 247, 16.9.2008, str. 20.
Import duties on the products referred to in Article 136(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 applicable from 17 September 2008
Uvozne dajatve za proizvode iz člena 136(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007, ki se uporabljajo od 17. septembra 2008
Commission Regulation (EC) No 899/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 899/2008
establishing a prohibition of fishing for cod in Norwegian waters of I and II by vessels flying the flag of United Kingdom
o prepovedi ribolova na trsko v norveških vodah območij I in II s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavo Združenega kraljestva
Commission Regulation (EC) No 900/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 900/2008
laying down the methods of analysis and other technical provisions necessary for the application of the arrangements for imports of certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products
o določitvi analiznih metod in drugih tehničnih določb, potrebnih za izvajanje uvoznih režimov za nekatero blago, pridobljeno s predelavo kmetijskih proizvodov
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff [1], and in particular Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2658/87 z dne 23. julija 1987 o tarifni in statistični nomenklaturi ter skupni carinski tarifi [1], in zlasti člena 9 Uredbe,
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 4154/87 of 22 December 1987 laying down the methods of analysis and other technical provisions necessary for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3033/80 laying down the trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products [2] has been substantially amended [3].
Uredba Komisije (EGS) št. 4154/87 z dne 22. decembra 1987 o določitvi analiznih metod in drugih tehničnih določb, potrebnih za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3033/80 o tržnem redu, ki se uporablja za nekatero blago, pridobljeno s predelavo kmetijskih proizvodov [2], je bila bistveno spremenjena [3].
In order to ensure that goods subject to Council Regulation (EC) No 3448/93 of 6 December 1993 laying down the trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products [4] receive uniform treatment on import throughout the Community, it is necessary that, when laying down analytic methods and other technical provisions, account should be taken of the scientific and technological evolution of analytical methods.
Za zagotovitev, da je v vsej Skupnosti blago, ki je predmet Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 3448/93 z dne 6. decembra 1993 o trgovinskih režimih za nekatero blago, pridobljeno s predelavo kmetijskih proizvodov [4], pri izvozu deležno enotnega obravnavanja, je treba upoštevati znanstveni in tehnološki razvoj analiznih metod.
This Regulation lays down the methods of analysis necessary for the application of Regulation (EC) No 3448/93 as far as imports are concerned and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1460/96 [5], or, in the absence of a method of analysis, the nature of the analytical operations to be carried out or the principle of a method to be applied.Article 2
Ta uredba določa analizne metode, potrebne zaradi izvajanja Uredbe (ES) št. 3448/93 glede uvoza in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1460/96 [5] ali, če analizne metode ne obstajajo, vrste analiznih postopkov, ki naj se izvajajo, ali princip metode, ki naj se uporablja.Člen 2
In accordance with the definitions set out in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1460/96 concerning starch/glucose content, and sucrose/invert sugar/isoglucose content, and for the purpose of applying Annexes II and III to that Regulation, the following formulae, procedures and methods shall be used for starch/glucose and sucrose/invert sugar/isoglucose content:
V skladu z opredelitvami iz Priloge III k Uredbi (ES) št. 1460/96 se za vsebnost škroba/glukoze in vsebnost saharoze/invertnega sladkorja/izoglukoze, in za namene izvajanja prilog II in III k navedeni uredbi za vsebnosti škroba/glukoze in saharoze/invertnega sladkorja/izoglukoze uporabljajo naslednje formule, postopki in metode:
Starch/glucose content:
Vsebnost škroba/glukoze
(expressed as 100 % anhydrous starch content of the goods as presented)
(izražena kot 100 % vsebnost brezvodnega škroba v izdelku, kakršen je)
if the glucose content is not less than the fructose content; or
če vsebnost glukoze ni nižja od vsebnosti fruktoze; ali
if the glucose content is less than the fructose content
če je vsebnost glukoze nižja od vsebnosti fruktoze,
Z is the glucose content determined by the method set out in Annex I to this Regulation;
Z vsebnost glukoze, določena z metodo iz Priloge I k tej uredbi;
F is the fructose content determined by HPLC (high performance liquid chromatography);
F vsebnost fruktoze, določena s HPLC (tekočinska kromatografija visoke ločljivosti);
G is the glucose content determined by HPLC.
G količina glukoze, določena s HPLC.
In the case of point (a), where the presence of a lactose hydrolysate is declared and/or quantities of lactose and galactose are detected, a glucose content equivalent to the galactose content (determined by HPLC) shall be deducted from the glucose content (Z) before any other calculation is made.
Če se pri (a) deklarira prisotnost hidrolizata laktoze in/ali zaznajo količine laktoze in galaktoze, se pred začetkom izračuna od celotne vsebnosti glukoze (Z) odšteje vsebnost glukoze, ekvivalentno vsebnosti galaktoze (določene s HPLC).
Sucrose/invert sugar/isoglucose content:
Vsebnost saharoze/invertnega sladkorja/izoglukoze
(expressed as sucrose content of the goods as presented)
(izražena kot vsebnost saharoze v izdelku, kakršen je)
if the glucose content is not less than the fructose content;
če vsebnost glukoze ni nižja od vsebnosti fruktoze;
S is the sucrose content determined by HPLC;
S vsebnost saharoze, določena s HPLC;
F is the fructose content determined by HPLC;
F vsebnost fruktoze, določena s HPLC;
Where the presence of a lactose hydrolysate is declared and/or quantities of lactose and galactose are detected, a glucose content equivalent to the galactose content (determined by HPLC) shall be deducted from the glucose (G) content before any other calculation is made.
Če se deklarira prisotnost hidrolizata laktoze in/ali zaznajo količine laktoze in galaktoze, se pred začetkom izračuna od celotne glukoze (G) odšteje vsebnost glukoze, ekvivalentno vsebnosti galaktoze (določene s HPLC).
Milk fat content:
Vsebnost mlečne maščobe
Save as otherwise provided in point (b), the milk fat content by weight of the goods as presented shall be determined by extraction with light petroleum after hydrolysis with hydrochloric acid;
Če v točki (b) ni predvideno drugače, se masni delež vsebnosti mlečne maščobe določi z ekstrakcijo s petroletrom po hidrolizi s klorovodikovo kislino.
Where fats other than milk fats are also declared in the composition of the goods, the following procedure shall be applied:
Če so v sestavi proizvoda deklarirane maščobe, ki niso mlečne, se mora uporabiti naslednji postopek:
the percentage of weight of the total fats in the goods shall be determined as mentioned in point (a),
masni delež vseh maščob v proizvodu se določi, kakor je opredeljeno v točki (a),