natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‘risk evaluation’ means a procedure based on the risk analysis to determine whether the acceptable risk has been achieved;
„ovrednotenje tveganja“ pomeni postopek, ki temelji na analizi tveganja, s katerim se ugotovi, ali je bilo doseženo sprejemljivo tveganje;
‘risk assessment’ means the overall process comprising a risk analysis and a risk evaluation;
„ocena tveganja“ pomeni celovit postopek, ki obsega analizo tveganja in ovrednotenje tveganja;
‘safety’ means freedom from unacceptable risk of harm;
„varnost“ pomeni odsotnost nesprejemljivih tveganj ali nevarnosti;
‘risk management’ means the systematic application of management policies, procedures and practices to the tasks of analysing, evaluating and controlling risks;
„upravljanje s tveganji“ pomeni sistematično uporabo politik, postopkov in praks upravljanja za analizo, ovrednotenje in nadzor tveganj;
‘interfaces’ means all points of interaction during a system or subsystem life-cycle, including operation and maintenance where different actors of the rail sector will work together in order to manage the risks;
„vmesniki“ pomenijo vse točke, kjer v življenjskem ciklu sistema ali podsistema prihaja do interakcij, vključno z delovanjem in vzdrževanjem, na katerih različni udeleženci v železniškem sektorju sodelujejo zaradi upravljanja s tveganji;
‘actors’ means all parties which are, directly or through contractual arrangements, involved in the application of this Regulation pursuant to Article 5(2);
„udeleženci“ pomenijo vse strani, ki neposredno ali prek pogodbenih dogovorov sodelujejo pri uporabi te uredbe v skladu s členom 5(2);
‘safety requirements’ means the safety characteristics (qualitative or quantitative) of a system and its operation (including operational rules) necessary in order to meet legal or company safety targets;
„varnostne zahteve“ pomenijo potrebne varnostne značilnosti (kvalitativne ali kvantitativne) sistema in njegovega delovanja (vključno z operativnimi predpisi), da ustrezajo pravnim varnostnim ciljem ali varnostnim ciljem družbe;
‘safety measures’ means a set of actions either reducing the rate of occurrence of a hazard or mitigating its consequences in order to achieve and/or maintain an acceptable level of risk;
„varnostni ukrepi“ pomenijo skupino ukrepov za zmanjševanje stopnje pojavnosti nevarnosti ali blažitev njenih posledic, da se doseže in/ali ohrani sprejemljiva raven tveganja;
‘proposer’ means the railway undertakings or the infrastructure managers in the framework of the risk control measures they have to implement in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 2004/49/EC, the contracting entities or the manufacturers when they invite a notified body to apply the ‘EC’ verification procedure in accordance with Article 18(1) of Directive 2008/57/EC or the applicant of an authorisation for placing in service of vehicles;
„predlagatelj“ pomeni prevoznike v železniškem prometu ali upravljavce železniške infrastrukture pri izvajanju ukrepov za nadzorovanje tveganja v skladu s členom 4 Direktive 2004/49/ES, podpisnike pogodbe ali proizvajalce, če v skladu s členom 18(1) Direktive 2008/57/ES priglašeni organ povabijo, da začne postopek za ES-verifikacijo, ali prosilca za dovoljenje za začetek obratovanja vozil;
‘safety assessment report’ means the document containing the conclusions of the assessment performed by an assessment body on the system under assessment;
„poročilo o varnostni oceni“ pomeni dokument, ki vsebuje zaključke, do katerih je prišel ocenjevalni organ med oceno sistema;
‘hazard’ means a condition that could lead to an accident;
„nevarnost“ pomeni stanje, ki bi lahko privedlo do nesreče;
‘assessment body’ means the independent and competent person, organisation or entity which undertakes investigation to arrive at a judgement, based on evidence, of the suitability of a system to fulfil its safety requirements;
„ocenjevalni organ“ pomeni neodvisno in pristojno osebo, organizacijo ali subjekt, ki na podlagi dokazov preveri, ali sistem izpolnjuje varnostne zahteve, in o tem sprejme odločitev;
‘risk acceptance criteria’ means the terms of reference by which the acceptability of a specific risk is assessed; these criteria are used to determine that the level of a risk is sufficiently low that it is not necessary to take any immediate action to reduce it further;
„merila sprejemanja tveganja“ pomenijo merila za ocenjevanje sprejemljivosti določenega tveganja; ta merila se uporabljajo za to, da se ugotovi, ali je raven tveganja dovolj nizka, da niso potrebni takojšnji ukrepi za njegovo zmanjšanje;
‘hazard record’ means the document in which identified hazards, their related measures, their origin and the reference to the organisation which has to manage them are recorded and referenced;
„evidenca nevarnosti“ pomeni dokument, v katerem so navedene ugotovljene nevarnosti, z njimi povezani ukrepi, njihov izvor ter organizacija, ki upravlja z njimi;
‘hazard identification’ means the process of finding, listing and characterising hazards;
„ugotavljanje nevarnosti“ pomeni postopek za prepoznavanje, navajanje in opredelitev nevarnosti;
‘risk acceptance principle’ means the rules used in order to arrive at the conclusion whether or not the risk related to one or more specific hazards is acceptable;
„načelo sprejemanja tveganja“ pomeni pravila, na podlagi katerih se zaključi, ali je tveganje, povezano z eno ali več nevarnostmi, sprejemljivo;
‘code of practice’ means a written set of rules that, when correctly applied, can be used to control one or more specific hazards;
„kodeks ravnanja“ pomeni niz napisanih pravil, s katerimi je mogoče ob pravilni uporabi nadzorovati eno ali več posebnih nevarnosti;
‘reference system’ means a system proven in use to have an acceptable safety level and against which the acceptability of the risks from a system under assessment can be evaluated by comparison;
„referenčni sistem“ pomeni sistem, za katerega se je v praksi izkazalo, da je njegova stopnja varnosti sprejemljiva in v primerjavi s katerim je mogoče ovrednotiti sprejemljivost tveganj v sistemu, ki se ocenjuje;
‘risk estimation’ means the process used to produce a measure of the level of risks being analysed, consisting of the following steps: estimation of frequency, consequence analysis and their integration;
„ocenjevanje tveganj“ pomeni postopek merjenja ravni analiziranih tveganj, ki vključuje naslednje stopnje: oceno pogostosti, analizo posledic in njihovo integracijo;
‘technical system’ means a product or an assembly of products including the design, implementation and support documentation; the development of a technical system starts with its requirements specification and ends with its acceptance; although the design of relevant interfaces with human behaviour is considered, human operators and their actions are not included in a technical system; the maintenance process is described in the maintenance manuals but is not itself part of the technical system;
„tehnični sistem“ pomeni proizvod ali skupino proizvodov, vključno z zasnovo, uvedbo in podporno dokumentacijo; razvoj tehničnega sistema se prične z določitvijo zahtev, konča pa z njegovo odobritvijo; čeprav se upošteva zasnova ustreznih vmesnikov s človeškim vedenjem, človeški izvajalci in njihova dejanja niso vključena v tehnični sistem; postopek vzdrževanja je opisan v priročnikih za vzdrževanje, vendar ni del tehničnega sistema;
‘catastrophic consequence’ means fatalities and/or multiple severe injuries and/or major damages to the environment resulting from an accident;
„katastrofalne posledice“ pomeni smrtne žrtve in/ali več težje ranjenih in/ali veliko škodo za okolje, ki jih povzroči nesreča;
‘safety acceptance’ means status given to the change by the proposer based on the safety assessment report provided by the assessment body;
„potrditev varnosti“ pomeni status, ki ga spremembi dodeli predlagatelj na podlagi poročila o varnostni oceni, ki ga je pripravil ocenjevalni organ;
‘system’ means any part of the railway system which is subject to a change;
„sistem“ pomeni kateri koli del železniškega sistema, ki je predmet spremembe;
‘notified national rule’ means any national rule notified by Member States under Council Directive 96/48/EC [4], Directive 2001/16/EC of the European Parliament and the Council [5] and Directives 2004/49/EC and 2008/57/EC.
„priglašeni nacionalni predpis“ pomeni kateri koli nacionalni predpis, ki ga države članice priglasijo v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 96/48/ES [4], Direktivo 2001/16/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5] in direktivama 2004/49/ES in 2008/57/ES.
Significant changes
Pomembne spremembe
If there is no notified national rule for defining whether a change is significant or not in a Member State, the proposer shall consider the potential impact of the change in question on the safety of the railway system.
Če ni priglašenega nacionalnega predpisa, ki bi določal, ali je sprememba v državi članici pomembna ali ne, predlagatelj pretehta morebitni učinek zadevne spremembe na varnost železniškega sistema.
When the proposed change has no impact on safety, the risk management process described in Article 5 does not need to be applied.
Kadar predlagana sprememba ne vpliva na varnost, ni treba uporabiti postopka upravljanja s tveganji iz člena 5.
When the proposed change has an impact on safety, the proposer shall decide, by expert judgement, the significance of the change based on the following criteria:
Kadar predlagana sprememba vpliva na varnost, predlagatelj strokovno oceni pomembnost spremembe na podlagi naslednjih meril:
failure consequence: credible worst-case scenario in the event of failure of the system under assessment, taking into account the existence of safety barriers outside the system;
posledice odpovedi: verjeten najslabši možni potek dogodkov v primeru odpovedi ocenjevanega sistema, pri čemer se upoštevajo obstoječi varnostni ukrepi zunaj sistema;
novelty used in implementing the change: this concerns both what is innovative in the railway sector, and what is new just for the organisation implementing the change;
novosti, ki se uvede s spremembo: to se nanaša tako na inovacije v železniškem sektorju kot tudi na novosti v organizaciji, ki uvaja spremembo;
complexity of the change;
kompleksnosti spremembe;
monitoring: the inability to monitor the implemented change throughout the system life-cycle and take appropriate interventions;
spremljanja: nezmožnost spremljanja uvedenih sprememb v življenjskem ciklu sistema in sprejetja primernih ukrepov;
reversibility: the inability to revert to the system before the change;
reverzibilnosti: nezmožnost ponovne uporabe sistema, kakršen je bil pred spremembo;
additionality: assessment of the significance of the change taking into account all recent safety-related modifications to the system under assessment and which were not judged as significant.
dodajnosti: ocena pomembnosti spremembe, pri čemer se upoštevajo vse nedavne z varnostjo povezane prilagoditve ocenjevanega sistema, ki ne veljajo za pomembne.
The proposer shall keep adequate documentation to justify his decision.
Predlagatelj vodi ustrezno dokumentacijo, ki vsebuje utemeljitev njegove odločitve.
Risk management process
Postopek upravljanja s tveganji
The risk management process described in Annex I shall apply:
Postopek upravljanja s tveganji iz Priloge I se uporablja:
for a significant change as specified in Article 4, including the placing in service of structural subsystems as referred to in Article 2(2)(b);
za pomembne spremembe, kot je določeno v členu 4, vključno z začetkom obratovanja strukturnih podsistemov iz člena 2(2)(b);
where a TSI as referred to in Article 2(2)(a) refers to this Regulation in order to prescribe the risk management process described in Annex I.
če TSI iz člena 2(2)(a) vsebuje sklic na to uredbo in predvideva uporabo postopka upravljanja s tveganji iz Priloge I.
The risk management process described in Annex I shall be applied by the proposer.
Postopek upravljanja s tveganji iz Priloge I uporablja predlagatelj.
The proposer shall ensure that risks introduced by suppliers and service providers, including their subcontractors, are managed.
Predlagatelj zagotovi upravljanje s tveganji, ki jih povzročijo dobavitelji in ponudniki storitev, vključno z njihovimi podizvajalci.
To this end, the proposer may request that suppliers and service providers, including their subcontractors, participate in the risk management process described in Annex I.
V ta namen lahko predlagatelj zahteva, da dobavitelji in ponudniki storitev, vključno z njihovimi podizvajalci, sodelujejo v postopku upravljanja s tveganji iz Priloge I.
An independent assessment of the correct application of the risk management process described in Annex I and of the results of this application shall be carried out by a body which shall meet the criteria listed in Annex II.
Neodvisno ocenjevanje pravilne uporabe postopka upravljanja s tveganji iz Priloge I in rezultatov te uporabe opravi organ, ki izpolnjuje merila iz Priloge II.
Where the assessment body is not already identified by Community or national legislation, the proposer shall appoint its own assessment body which may be another organisation or an internal department.
Kadar v zakonodaji Skupnosti ali nacionalni zakonodaji še ni določen ocenjevalni organ, predlagatelj določi svoj ocenjevalni organ, ki je lahko druga organizacija ali notranji oddelek.
Duplication of work between the conformity assessment of the safety management system as required by Directive 2004/49/EC, the conformity assessment carried out by a notified body or a national body as required by Directive 2008/57/EC and any independent safety assessment carried out by the assessment body in accordance with this Regulation, shall be avoided.
Treba se je izogibati podvajanju dela med ocenjevanjem skladnosti sistema varnega upravljanja v skladu z Direktivo 2004/49/ES, ocenjevanjem skladnosti v skladu z Direktivo 2008/57/ES, ki ga izvede priglašeni organ ali nacionalni organ, in kakršnim koli neodvisnim varnostnim ocenjevanjem, ki ga izvede ocenjevalni organ v skladu s to uredbo.
The safety authority may act as the assessment body where the significant changes concern the following cases:
Varnostni organ ima lahko vlogo ocenjevalnega organa, če pomembne spremembe zadevajo naslednje primere:
where a vehicle needs an authorisation for placing in service, as referred to in Articles 22(2) and 24(2) of Directive 2008/57/EC;
kadar vozilo potrebuje dovoljenje za začetek obratovanja v skladu s členoma 22(2) in 24(2) Direktive 2008/57/ES;
where a vehicle needs an additional authorisation for placing in service, as referred to in Articles 23(5) and 25(4) of Directive 2008/57/EC;
kadar vozilo potrebuje dodatno dovoljenje za začetek obratovanja v skladu s členoma 23(5) in 25(4) Direktive 2008/57/ES;
where the safety certificate has to be updated due to an alteration of the type or extent of the operation, as referred to in Article 10(5) of Directive 2004/49/EC;
kadar je treba varnostno spričevalo podaljšati zaradi spremembe vrste ali obsega dejavnosti v skladu s členom 10(5) Direktive 2004/49/ES;
where the safety certificate has to be revised due to substantial changes to the safety regulatory framework, as referred to in Article 10(5) of Directive 2004/49/EC;
kadar je treba varnostno spričevalo zaradi bistvene spremembe varnostnega regulativnega okvira revidirati v skladu s členom 10(5) Direktive 2004/49/ES;
where the safety authorisation has to be updated due to substantial changes to the infrastructure, signalling or energy supply, or to the principles of its operation and maintenance, as referred to in Article 11(2) of Directive 2004/49/EC;
kadar je treba varnostno pooblastilo podaljšati zaradi bistvene spremembe železniške infrastrukture, signalizacije, oskrbe z energijo ali načel za njeno delovanje in vzdrževanje v skladu s členom 11(2) Direktive 2004/49/ES;
where the safety authorisation has to be revised due to substantial changes to the safety regulatory framework, as referred to in Article 11(2) of Directive 2004/49/EC.
kadar je treba varnostno pooblastilo zaradi bistvene spremembe varnostnega regulativnega okvira revidirati v skladu s členom 11(2) Direktive 2004/49/ES.
Where the significant changes concern a structural subsystem that needs an authorisation for placing in service as referred to in Article 15(1) or Article 20 of Directive 2008/57/EC, the safety authority may act as the assessment body unless the proposer already gave that task to a notified body in accordance with Article 18(2) of that Directive.
Kadar pomembne spremembe zadevajo strukturni podsistem, za katerega je potrebno dovoljenje za začetek obratovanja v skladu s členom 15(1) in členom 20 Direktive 2008/57/ES, ima varnostni organ lahko vlogo ocenjevalnega organa, razen če ni predlagatelj naloge že zaupal priglašenemu organu v skladu s členom 18(2) navedene direktive.
Safety assessment reports
Poročila o varnostni oceni
The assessment body shall provide the proposer with a safety assessment report.
Ocenjevalni organ predlagatelju zagotovi poročilo o varnostni oceni.
In the case referred to in point (a) of Article 5(1), the safety assessment report shall be taken into account by the national safety authority in its decision to authorise the placing in service of subsystems and vehicles.
V primeru iz točke (a) člena 5(1) nacionalni varnostni organ pri svoji odločitvi o odobritvi začetka obratovanja podsistemov in vozil upošteva poročilo o varnostni oceni.
In the case referred to in point (b) of Article 5(1), the independent assessment shall be part of the task of the notified body, unless otherwise prescribed by the TSI.
V primeru iz točke (b) člena 5(1) je neodvisna ocena del nalog priglašenega organa, razen če je v TSI določeno drugače.
If the independent assessment is not part of the task of the notified body, the safety assessment report shall be taken into account by the notified body in charge of delivering the conformity certificate or by the contracting entity in charge of drawing up the EC declaration of verification.
Če neodvisna ocena ni del nalog priglašenega organa, priglašeni organ, odgovoren za izdajo potrdila o skladnosti, ali naročnik, odgovoren za pripravo izjave ES o verifikaciji, upošteva poročilo o varnostni oceni.
When a system or part of a system has already been accepted following the risk management process specified in this Regulation, the resulting safety assessment report shall not be called into question by any other assessment body in charge of performing a new assessment for the same system.
Kadar je bil sistem ali del sistema že sprejet na podlagi postopka upravljanja s tveganji iz te uredbe, poročila o varnostni oceni, ki nastane na tej podlagi, ne more izpodbijati noben drug ocenjevalni organ, odgovoren za ponovno ocenjevanje istega sistema.
The recognition shall be conditional on demonstration that the system will be used under the same functional, operational and environmental conditions as the already accepted system, and that equivalent risk acceptance criteria have been applied.
Pogoj za priznavanje je, da se dokaže, da se bo sistem uporabljal pod enakimi funkcionalnimi, operativnimi in okoljskimi pogoji kot že potrjeni sistem ter da so bila pri tem upoštevana ekvivalentna merila sprejemanja tveganja.
Risk control management/internal and external audits
Upravljanje nadzorovanja tveganja/notranje in zunanje revizije
The railway undertakings and infrastructure managers shall include audits of application of the CSM on risk evaluation and assessment in their recurrent auditing scheme of the safety management system as referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2004/49/EC.
Prevozniki v železniškem prometu in upravljavci železniške infrastrukture v svoje redne programe revizij sistema varnega upravljanja v skladu s členom 9 Direktive 2004/49/ES vključijo revizijo SVM, uporabljenih pri ovrednotenju in ocenjevanju tveganja.
Within the framework of the tasks defined in Article 16(2)(e) of Directive 2004/49/EC, the national safety authority shall monitor the application of the CSM on risk evaluation and assessment.
V okviru nalog iz člena 16(2)(e) Direktive 2004/49/ES nacionalni varnostni organ spremlja SVM, uporabljene pri ovrednotenju in ocenjevanju tveganja.
Feedback and technical progress
Povratne informacije in tehnični napredek
Each infrastructure manager and each railway undertaking shall, in its annual safety report referred to in Article 9(4) of Directive 2004/49/EC, report briefly on its experience with the application of the CSM on risk evaluation and assessment.
Vsak upravljavec železniške infrastrukture in vsak prevoznik v železniškem prometu v svojem letnem varnostnem poročilu iz člena 9(4) Direktive 2004/49/ES kratko poroča o svojih izkušnjah s SVM, uporabljenih pri ovrednotenju in ocenjevanju tveganja.
The report shall also include a synthesis of the decisions related to the level of significance of the changes.
Poročijo vsebuje tudi sintezo odločitev, povezanih s stopnjo pomembnosti sprememb.
Each national safety authority shall, in its annual safety report referred to in Article 18 of Directive 2004/49/EC, report on the experience of the proposers with the application of the CSM on risk evaluation and assessment, and, where appropriate, its own experience.
Vsak nacionalni varnostni organ v svojem letnem varnostnem poročilu iz člena 18 Direktive 2004/49/ES poroča o izkušnjah predlagateljev s SVM, uporabljenih pri ovrednotenju in ocenjevanju tveganja, po potrebi pa tudi o svojih lastnih izkušnjah.
The European Railway Agency shall monitor and collect feedback on the application of the CSM on risk evaluation and assessment and, where applicable, shall make recommendations to the Commission with a view to improving it.
3. Evropska železniška agencija spremlja uporabo SVM za ovrednotenje in oceno tveganja in zbira povratne informacije v zvezi z njimi ter Komisiji po potrebi svetuje, kako jih izboljšati.
The European Railway Agency shall submit to the Commission by 31 December 2011 at the latest, a report which shall include:
4. Evropska železniška agencija Komisiji najpozneje 31. decembra 2011 predloži poročilo, ki vsebuje:
an analysis of the experience with the application of the CSM on risk evaluation and assessment, including cases where the CSM has been applied by proposers on a voluntary basis before the relevant date of application provided for in Article 10;
analizo izkušenj uporabe SVM za ovrednotenje in oceno tveganja, vključno s primeri, kjer predlagatelji uporabljajo SVM prostovoljno pred datumom začetka uporabe, določenim v členu 10;
an analysis of the experience of the proposers concerning the decisions related to the level of significance of the changes;
analizo izkušenj predlagateljev v zvezi z odločitvami, povezanimi s stopnjo pomembnosti sprememb;
an analysis of the cases where codes of practice have been used as described in section 2.3.8 of Annex I;
analizo primerov, v katerih je bil uporabljen kodeks ravnanja, kot je opisano v oddelku 2.3.8 Priloge I;
an analysis of overall effectiveness of the CSM on risk evaluation and assessment.
analizo splošne učinkovitosti SVM za vrednotenje in oceno tveganja.
The safety authorities shall assist the Agency by identifying cases of application of the CSM on risk evaluation and assessment.
Varnostni organi pomagajo agenciji z identifikacijo primerov uporabe SVM za vrednotenje in oceno tveganja.
This Regulation shall apply from 1 July 2012.
Ta uredba se uporablja od 1. julija 2012.
However, it shall apply from 19 July 2010:
Vendar se uporablja od 19. julija 2010:
to all significant technical changes affecting vehicles as defined in Article 2(c) of Directive 2008/57/EC;
pri vseh pomembnih tehničnih spremembah, ki se nanašajo na vozila, kot so opredeljena v členu 2(c) Direktive 2008/57/ES;
to all significant changes concerning structural subsystems, where required by Article 15(1) of Directive 2008/57/EC or by a TSI.
pri vseh pomembnih tehničnih spremembah, ki se nanašajo na strukturne podsisteme, kadar je to zahtevano v členu 15(1) Direktive 2008/57/ES ali v TSI.
GENERAL PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE TO THE RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS
SPLOŠNA NAČELA, KI SE UPORABLJAJO V POSTOPKU UPRAVLJANJA S TVEGANJI
General principles and obligations
Splošna načela in obveznosti