natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Between 4749,6 and 5049,6 MW.
Med 4749,6 in 5049,6 MW.
Between 4724,7 and 5024,7 MW.
Med 4724,7 in 5024,7 MW.
The actual off-take figures cover all the sales of the power plant concerned to MVM.
Dejanske vrednosti odjema vključujejo celotno prodajo zadevne elektrarne MVM.
The total generated electricity and own consumption data also cover the blocks of these plants which are not under PPA.
Podatki o celotni proizvedeni električni energiji in lastni porabi vključujejo bloke tistih elektrarn, ki ne sodijo v okvir SNEE.
Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded; OJ L 236, 23.9.2003.
Akt o pogojih pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Cipra, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike in prilagoditvah pogodb, na katerih temelji Evropska unija; UL L 236, 23.9.2003.
Case C-482/99 French Republic v Commission [2002] ECR I-04397.
Primer C-482/99 Francoska republika proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti [2002] ZOdl. I-04397.
Decision of 16 May 2002.
Odločitev z dne 16. maja 2002.
Reference is made to Case T-366/00, Scott S.A.
Sklicevanje na primer T-366/00, Scott S.A.
OJ C 34, 7.2.2004, p. 8.
UL C 34, 7.2.2004, str. 8.
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, and Oberbundesanwalt beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht [2003] ECR I-07747.
Primer C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg proti Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, in Oberbundesanwalt beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht [2003] ECR I-07747.
Directive 2003/54/EC.
Direktiva 2003/54/ES.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 June 2000 in Joined Cases T-298/97, T-312/97, T-313/97, T-315/97, T-600/97 to T-607/97, T-1/98, T-3/98 to T-6/98 and T-23/98.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 15. junija 2000 v združenih primerih T-298/97, T-312/97, T-313/97, T-315/97, T-600/97 do T-607/97, T-1/98, T-3/98 do T-6/98 in T-23/98.
Letter registered on 19 December 2006.
Dopis, evidentiran 19. decembra 2006.
The judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 June 2000 in the Alzetta Mauro case referred to by Budapest power plant also confirms that the measure needs to be assessed in the light of the new market circumstances after liberalisation when recognising that the measure which may not have constituted State aid before liberalisation becomes (existing or new) aid.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 15. junija 2000 v primeru Alzetta Mauro, na katero se sklicuje elektrarna Budapest, potrjuje, da je ukrep treba oceniti v okviru okoliščin novega trga po liberalizaciji, ko ukrep, ki pred liberalizacijo morda ni predstavljal državne pomoči, postane (obstoječa ali nova) pomoč.
Europe Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Hungary, of the other part, signed on 16 December 1991.
Evropski sporazum o pridružitvi med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani in Republiko Madžarsko na drugi strani, podpisan dne 16. decembra 1991.
Quotation from point 3 of the generator's comments.
Citat iz točke 3 pripomb proizvajalca.
Irrespective of whether the price is based on the price formula contained in the PPAs or on pricing decrees, given that both are based on principles similar to pricing regulation.
Ne glede na to, ali cena temelji na cenovni formuli iz SNEE ali na uredbah o določanju cen, saj obe temeljita na načelih, ki so podobna uredbi o oblikovanju cen.
Joined cases C-328/99 and C-399/00 Italy and SIM 2 Multimedia v Commission [2003] ECR I-4035, paragraph 83.
Združena primera C-328/99 P in C-399/OO Italija in SIM 2 Multimedia proti Komisiji [2003] ECR I-4035, odstavek 83.
In June 2005 the Commission opened an inquiry into the operation of the European gas and electricity markets.
Junija 2005 je Komisija odprla preiskavo glede delovanja evropskih trgov za plin in električno energijo.
Short-run marginal costs are the costs that power generators can avoid by choosing to stop generating electricity in the short term.
Kratkoročni mejni stroški so stroški, ki se jim lahko proizvajalci energije izognejo tako, da prenehajo kratkoročno proizvajati električno energijo.
These costs are more or less equal to variable costs, since both are primarily driven by fuel costs.
Ti stroški so bolj ali manj enaki variabilnim, saj gre pri obeh vrstah stroškov predvsem za stroške goriva.
The fact that the supplier commits to deliver the quantity set in the contract may be regarded as equivalent to capacity reservation.
Dejstvo, da se dobavitelj obveže k dostavi količine, ki je določena v pogodbi, se lahko šteje za enakovredno rezervaciji zmogljivosti.
15 % of contracted capacities in 2005.
15 % pogodbenih zmogljivosti v letu 2005.
Owing to the annual tenders, the amount of capacity that can be offered to the TSO and the price obtained vary on an annual basis and may decrease if the TSO's needs decrease and/or if lower prices or larger amounts are offered by other suppliers.
Zaradi letnih ponudnikov količina zmogljivosti, ki se lahko ponudi UPO, in dosežena cena nihata na letni osnovi in se lahko znižata, če se potrebe UPO zmanjšajo in/ali če drugi dobavitelji ponudijo nižje cene ali večje količine.
The Hungarian legislation requires MVM and the regional distribution companies to buy the electricity produced in cogeneration or from waste or renewable energy sources at regulated prices.
Madžarska zakonodaja od MVM in regionalnih distribucijskih podjetij zahteva, da kupujejo električno energijo, proizvedeno s soproizvodnjo, iz odpadkov ali iz obnovljivih energetskih virov po reguliranih cenah.
See amongst others the website http://www.mvm.hu
Glej med drugim spletno stran http://www.mvm.hu
Resulting from the regulated tariffs, which depend on the level of consumption.
Posledica reguliranih cen, ki so odvisne od ravni porabe.
Directive 2003/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 96/92/EC, OJ L 176, p. 37-55.
Direktiva 2003/54/ES.
Governmental Decree 183/2002.
Uredba vlade 183/2002.
See the letter of the Hungarian authorities registered on 4 June 2004.
Glej dopis madžarskih organov, evidentiran 4. junija 2004.
Capacity auctions, capacity tenders and MVM Marketplace.
Avkcije zmogljivosti, javni razpisi za zmogljivosti in trg MVM-ja.
The quantities sold are below 1000 MWh.
Prodane količine so manjše od 1000 MWh.
The Commission considers that the price for such limited quantities does not constitute an adequate basis for comparison with PPA prices.
Komisija meni, da cena za tako omejene količine ne predstavlja ustrezne osnove za primerjavo s cenami SNEE.
This Decision is based on the most recent information (letter of 16 January 2008).
Ta odločba temelji na najnovejših podatkih (dopis z dne 16. januarja 2008).
The imports by MVM are also based on long-term agreements; those agreements are not covered by the present procedure.
Uvoz MVM temelji na dolgoročnih sporazumih, ti sporazumi pa niso vključeni v zadevni postopek.
Name of import partner company.
Naziv uvoznega partnerskega podjetja.
The average weighted price of all electricity imports covered in this table was 9,14 HUF/kWh in 2004, 10,41 HUF/kWh in 2005, and 11,49 HUF/kWh in 2006.
Povprečna ponderirana cena vseh uvozov električne energije, vključenih v to tabelo, je bila 9,14 HUF/kWh leta 2004, 10,41 HUF/kWh leta 2005 in 11,49 HUF/kWh leta 2006.
See recital 32 of this Decision.
Glej uvodno izjavo 32 te odločbe.
The average prices represent indicative weighted prices.
Povprečne cene predstavljajo indikativne ponderirane cene.
The quantities sold are between 25000 and 2000000 MWh per type of product (off-peak/base/peak).
Prodane količine znašajo med 25000 in 2000000 MWh na vrsto proizvoda (nizka/osnovna/konična).
According to the Hungarian authorities, in the absence of PPAs the various generators currently under PPAs would achieve maximum profit in the following way: the Paks and Pécs power plants would sell 100 % of their production in the form of base load products, the Mátra, Dunament G2, Kelenfold, Ujpest and Kispest power plants would sell approximately 50 % of their produced electricity as base and 50 % as peak products, while the Csepel, Dunament F block and Tisza II power plants would sell mostly peak electricity (approximately 70 %).
Po mnenju madžarskih organov bi ob odsotnosti SNEE različni proizvajalci, ki so trenutno v okviru SNEE, dosegli največji dobiček na naslednji način: Elektrarni Paks in Pécs bi prodali 100 % svoje proizvodnje v obliki proizvodov osnovne obremenitve, elektrarne Mátra, Dunament G2, Kelenfold, Ujpest in Kispest bi prodale približno 50 % svoje proizvedene električne energije v obliki proizvodov osnovne obremenitve in 50 % v obliki proizvodov konične obremenitve, medtem ko bi elektrarne Csepel, Dunament F blok in Tisza II prodajale večinoma konično električno energijo (približno 70 %).
See Commission decisions in cases N 34/99 (OJ C 5, 8.1.2002, p. 2), NN 49/99 (OJ C 268, 22.9.2001, p. 7), N 6/A/2001 (OJ C 77, 28.3.2002, p. 25) and C 7/05 (not yet published).
Glej odločbe Komisije v primerih N 34/99 (UL C 5, 8.1.2002, str. 2), NN 49/99 (UL C 268, 22.9.2001, str. 7), N 6/A/2001 (UL C 77, 28.3.2002, str. 25) in C 7/2005 (še ni objavljeno v UL).
These are actually the second and third criteria of the Altmark judgment.
To sta drugo in tretje merilo iz razsodbe Altmark.
Case T-55/99 of the Court of First Instance of 29 September 2000, CETM v Commission, paragraphs 40 and 52.
Primer T-55/99 Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 29. septembra 2000, CETM proti Komisiji, odstavka 40 in 52.
Case 203/82 of the Court of 14 July 1983, Commission v Italy, paragraph 4.Case 173/73 of the Court of 2 July 1973, Italy v Commission, paragraph 18.
Primer 203/82 Sodišča z dne 14. julija 1983, Komisija proti Italijanski republiki, odstavek 4.Primer 173/73 Sodišča z dne 2. julija 1973, Komisija proti Italijanski republiki, odstavek 18.
Case C-379/98 of the Court of Justice of 13 March 2001.
Primer C-379/98 Sodišča z dne 13. marca 2001.
Case C-482/99 of 16 May 2002 of the Court of Justice.
Primer C-482/99 Sodišča z dne 16. marca 2002.
See e.g. the letter of the Hungarian authorities registered on 25 July 2005.
Glej tudi dopis madžarskih organov, evidentiran 25. julija 2005.
Page 5 of the comments.
Stran 5 opomb.
Letter registered on 25 July 2005.
Dopis, evidentiran 25. julija 2005.
‘A szerződés mintegy átemelte a Kormányhatározatban szereplő képleteket, meghatározásokat.’ Letter of the Hungarian authorities registered on 25 July 2005.
„A szerződés mintegy átemelte a Kormányhatározatban szereplő képleteket, meghatározásokat.“ Dopis madžarskih organov, evidentiran 25. julija 2005.
Letter dated 20 July 2005 registered on 25 July 2005.
Dopis z dne 20. julija 2005, evidentiran 25. julija 2005.
The text of the Joint Guidelines was submitted to the Commission in English only.
Besedilo skupnih smernic je bilo Komisiji predloženo samo v angleškem jeziku.
Forwarded to the Commission by the Hungarian authorities on 20 October 2004 and, in respect of Dunament, on 25 July 2005.
Posredovano Komisiji s strani madžarskih organov dne 20. oktobra 2004, v zvezi z elektrarno Dunament, dne 25. julija 2005.
Annex 3 to […]’s submissions.
Priloga 3 pripomb […].
Name of power generator.
Naziv proizvajalca energije.
See in particular the judgement of the Court of First Instance of 13 June 2000 in Joint Cases T-204/97 and T-270/97 EPAC v Commission [2000] ECR II-02267.
Glej zlasti sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 13. junija 2000 v združenih primerih T-204/97 in T-270/97 EPAC proti. Komisiji [2000] ECR II-02267.
Published on 15 May 2006.
Objavljeno 15. maja 2006.
Point 24 of the Conclusions (Összefoglalás) of the Report.
Točka 24 sklepov (Összefoglalás) poročila.
Quotation from point 2 of the Study: ‘összeegyeztethetetlen a versenypiaci működés elveivel’.
Citat iz točke 2 raziskave: „összeegyeztethetetlen a versenypiaci működés elveivel.“
10 January 2007; http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/antitrust/others/sector_inquiries/energy/
januarja 2007; http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/antitrust/others/sector_inquiries/energy/.
The information is available on the website of the Hungarian Energy Office: www.eh.gov.hu
Informacije so na voljo na spletni strani Madžarskega energetskega urada: www.eh.gov.hu
Study by Dr Theon van Dijk, March 2006.
Raziskava Dr. Theona van Dijka, marec 2006.
E.g. see the Commission decision of 28 January 2004 on State aid, CZ 14/2003 – Czech Republic ‘Česka spořitelna, a.s.’.
Glej odločbo Komisije z dne 28. januarja 2004 o državni pomoči, CZ 14/2003 – Češka republika „Česka spořitelna, a.s.“.
See footnote 32.
Glej sprotno opombo 32.
Regional aid map of Hungary, approved by the Commission on 13 September 2006 and published in OJ C 256, 24.10.2006, p. 7.
Zemljevid regionalne pomoči Madžarske, ki ga je odobrila Komisija dne 13. septembra 2006 in je bil objavljen v UL C 256, 24.10.2006, str. 7.
Point 4.15 of the old and point 5 of the new Regional Aid Guidelines.
Točka 4.15 starih in točka 5 novih smernic o regionalni pomoči.
The quotation is from point 5 of the new Regional Aid Guidelines.
Citat je iz točke 5 novih smernic o regionalni pomoči.
Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection, OJ C 37, 3.2.2001, p. 3.
Smernice Skupnosti o državni pomoči za varovanje okolja, UL C 37, 3.2.2001, str. 3.
See the introductory provisions of the Methodology.
Glej uvodne določbe Metodologije.
The date of liberalisation of the electricity market, which for Hungary was 1 May 2004.
Datum liberalizacije trga z električno energijo, ki je bil za Madžarsko 1. maja 2004.
Case C-70/72, Commission v Germany, [1973] ECR 00813, point 13.
Primer C-70/72, Komisija proti Nemčiji, [1973] ECR 00813, točka 13.
Joined Cases C-278/92, C-279/92 and C-280/92 Spain v Commission, [1994] ECR I-4103, point 75.
Združeni primeri C-278/92, C-279/92 in C-280/92 Španija proti Komisiji, [1994] ECR I-4103, točka 75.
Case C-75/97, Belgium v Commission, [1999] ECR I-030671 points 64-65.
Primer C-75/97, Belgija proti Komisiji, [1999] ECR I-030671, točke 64-65.
Case C-75/97, Belgium v Commission, [1999] ECR I-030671 point 68, Case C-142/87 Belgium v Commission, [1990] ECR I-00959 point 66, and Joined Cases C-278/92 to C-280/92 Spain v Commission, [1994] ECR I-04103, point 75.
Primer C-75/97, Belgija proti Komisiji, [1999] ECR I-030671, točka 68, Primer C-142/87 Belgija proti Komisiji, ECR I-00959 [1990], točka 66, in združeni primeri C-278/92 to C-280/92 Španija proti Komisiji, [1994] ECR I-04103, točka 75.
Defined as a fictitious scenario whereby no PPA was in force between 1 May 2004 and the date of termination of the PPAs.
Opredeljen kot fiktivni scenarij, pri katerem nobeden izmed SNEE ne bi veljal med 1. majem 2004 in datumom razveljavitve SNEE.
The ‘actual scenario’ is what actually happened owing to the existence of the PPAs.
„Dejanski scenarij“ je, kar se je dejansko zgodilo zaradi obstoja SNEE.
This parameter is expressed in MW and is commonly called ‘system load’.
Ta parameter je izražen v MW in se običajno imenuje „obremenitev sistema“.
Periods of high demand are commonly called ‘peak load’ periods, as opposed to ‘base load’ periods.
Obdobja visokega povpraševanja so imenovana „konična“ obdobja v nasprotju z „obdobji osnovne obremenitve“ obdobji.
See, in particular, Case C-480/98 Spain v Commission [2000] ECR I-8717, point 25, and Case C-415/03, Commission v Greece, [2005] ECR I-03875, point 39.
Glej zlasti primer C-480/98 Španija proti Komisiji [2000] ECR I-8717, točka 25, in primer C-415/03, Komisija proti Grčiji, [2005] ECR I-3875, točka 39.
In perfectly competitive conditions, all the generation units necessary to meet demand at each point in time are those which have the lowest short run marginal costs and are able to supply the network with all the power needed to meet demand.
V popolnih konkurenčnih pogojih so vse proizvodne enote, ki so potrebne za zadostitev povpraševanja v vsakem trenutku, tiste enote, ki imajo najnižji kratkoročni mejni strošek in so sposobne oskrbovati mrežo z vso potrebno energijo, da zadostijo povpraševanju.
Power generation units can be ranked according to their short run marginal costs.
Enote za proizvodnjo električne energije lahko razvrstimo glede na njihove kratkoročne mejne stroške.
Their access to the market at each point in time depends on their ranking in this ‘merit order’, on the system load and on the power supplied by the generation units that have a higher ranking in the merit order.
Njihov dostop do trga v vsakem trenutku je odvisen od njihove razvrstitve v „vrstnem redu zaslug“, sistemske obremenitve in od energije, ki jo proizvedejo proizvodne enote, ki so glede na vrstni red zaslug višje uvrščene.
E.g. the ratio is 5 % in France, 11 % in the United Kingdom, 44 % in Italy and 84 % in Spain.
Npr. razmerje je 5 % v Franciji, 11 % v Veliki Britaniji, 44 % v Italiji in 84 % v Španiji.
Whether under PPA or not.
V okviru SNEE ali izven okvira SNEE.
Taking due account of the losses on the transmission and distribution networks.
Odvzem zaradi izgube prenosnih in distribucijskih omrežij.
The actual scenario corresponds to the market as it has stood since 1 May 2004 with the existence of the PPAs.
Sedanji scenarij ustreza trgu, kot se je oblikoval od 1. maja 2004 naprej, vključno z obstojem SNEE.
Which would have remained in force under the counterfactual scenario.
Ki bi ostali veljavni v primeru obratnega scenarija.
This amount corresponds to the power actually consumed by consumers on the regulated segment and an additional amount needed owing to losses on the transmission and distribution networks.
Ta količina ustreza energiji, ki so jo potrošniki dejansko porabili v reguliranem segmentu, in dodatni količini, ki je bila potrebna zaradi izgube na prenosnih in distribucijskih omrežjih.
Between 1 May 2004 and the actual termination of the PPAs.
Med 1. majem 2004 in dejanskim prenehanjem SNEE.
These revenues are to be computed on the basis of the prices actually paid by MVM.
Te prihodke je treba izračunati na podlagi cen, ki jih je dejansko plačalo MVM.
For the period when regulated prices overrode the price formulae of the PPAs (between 9 December 2006 and 31 December 2007), regulated prices should be taken into account for that calculation.
Za obdobje, ko so regulirane cene nadomestile cenovne formule SNEE (med 9. decembrom 2006 in 31. decembrom 2007), je treba pri izračunu upoštevati regulirane cene.
The Member States concerned were Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom, which are among the largest wholesale markets in Europe.
Zadevne države članice so bile Belgija, Francija, Nemčija, Italija, Nizozemska, Španija in Velika Britanija, ki so med največjimi veleprodajnimi trgi v Evropi.
See Case C-94/87 Commission v Germany [1989] ECR-175, point 9 and Case C-348/93 Commission v Italy [1995] ECR-673, point 17.
Glej primer C-94/87 Komisija proti Nemčiji [1989] ECR -175, točka 9, in primer C-348/93, Komisija proti Italiji, [1995] ECR-673, točka 17.
The company names listed are those that applied at the time of signature of the PPAs.
Našteta podjetja so tista, ki so se prijavila v času podpisa SNEE.
The reply, dated 20 July 2005, was registered by the Commission on 25 July 2005.
Odgovor z dne 20. julija 2005 je Komisija evidentirala 25. julija 2005.
Further information was provided by the Hungarian authorities by letter dated 28 September 2005, registered on 30 September 2005.
Madžarski organi so dodatne informacije predložili z dopisom z dne 28. septembra 2005, evidentiranim 30. septembra 2005.
The Commission sent a request for further information on 23 April 2007.
Komisija je dne 23. aprila 2007 poslala zahtevo po dodatnih informacijah.
Hungary replied on 5 June 2007 and sent additional information on 6 August 2007.
Madžarska je odgovorila 5. junija 2007 in poslala dodatne informacije dne 6. avgusta 2007.
In the context of the liberalisation process, the new Act on Electric Energy [12] was published on 2 July 2007 and entered into force partially on 15 October 2007 and partially on 1 January 2008.
V okviru procesa liberalizacije je bil 2. julija 2007 objavljen nov zakon o električni energiji [12], ki je delno začel veljati 15. oktobra 2007 in delno 1. januarja 2008.
By letter of 25 July 2007, the Hungarian Government informed the Commission of the achievements of the new Electricity Act as regards the opening up of the Hungarian electricity market.
Z dopisom z dne 25. julija 2007 so madžarski organi obvestili Komisijo o dosežkih novega zakona o električni energiji glede odpiranja madžarskega trga z električno energijo.
The Hungarian authorities replied on 4 and 13 March 2008.
Madžarski organi so odgovorili 4. in 13. marca 2008.
In response to Dunament power plant's explicit request, the Hungarian authorities attached to their reply letters sent by Dunament to the Ministry of Finance and to the Hungarian Energy Office dated 14 May 2007, 21 August 2007, 13 September 2007, 7 December 2007, 14 January 2008 and 20 February 2008.
V odgovor na izrecno prošnjo elektrarne Dunament so madžarski organi v svojem odgovoru priložili dopise, ki jih je elektrarna Dunament poslala Ministrstvu za finance in Madžarskemu uradu za energetiko dne 14. maja 2007, 21. avgusta 2007, 13. septembra 2007, 7. decembra 2007, 14. januarja 2008 in 20. februarja 2008.
The Hungarian authorities had not forwarded a copy of these letters to the Commission at an earlier stage [13]; however, in their replies to the Commission's questions throughout the procedure they had included the information they found relevant.
Madžarski organi na začetni stopnji Komisiji niso posredovali kopije omenjenih dopisov [13]; vendar pa so v svoje odgovore na vprašanja Komisije med postopkom vključili vse informacije, ki so se jim zdele pomembne.
The Commission asked for the confirmation of certain data by the Hungarian Government in a letter dated 7 April 2008.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 7. aprila 2008 madžarsko vlado zaprosila za potrditev nekaterih podatkov.
The Hungarian authorities provided the requested information by letter registered on 22 April 2008.
Madžarski organi so zahtevane informacije predložili z dopisom, evidentiranim 22. aprila 2008.
In their letter of 20 May 2008, the Hungarian authorities informed the Commission that the PPA of the Paks power plant had been terminated by the parties on 31 March 2008.
Z dopisom z dne 20. maja 2008 so madžarski organi Komisijo obvestili, da so podpisniki dne 31. marca 2008 prekinili SNEE elektrarne Paks.
Although the Csepel and Pannon power plants signed termination agreements in April 2008, the entry into force of the agreements is, at the date of this Decision, still dependent on approval by shareholders and banking institutions.
Kljub temu, da sta elektrarni Csepel in Pannon aprila 2008 podpisali sporazum o prenehanju, je datum začetka veljavnosti omenjenih sporazumov na dan te odločbe še vedno odvisen od odobritve delničarjev in bančnih ustanov.
Act CX of 2001 on Electric Energy (‘Energy Act II’, replacing Energy Act I) entered into force on 1 January 2003.
Zakon CX iz leta 2001 o električni energiji („Zakon o električni energiji II“, ki nadomešča Zakon o električni energiji I) je začel veljati 1. januarja 2003.
It established a dual model of the Hungarian electricity market which remained in force until 1 January 2008, when Act LXXXVI of 2007 on Electric Energy (‘Energy Act III’, replacing Energy Act II) entered into force.
Vzpostavlja dvojni model madžarskega trga električne energije, ki je veljal do 1. januarja 2008, ko je začel veljati Zakon LXXXVI iz leta 2007 o električni energiji („Zakon o električni energiji II“, ki nadomešča Zakon o električni energiji II).
This Decision concerns only those PPAs that were in force on 1 May 2004.
Ta odločba se nanaša samo na tiste SNEE, ki so bili veljavni 1. maja 2004.