natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Part A of Annex I to Decision 2009/177/EC sets out the list of Member States, zones and compartments subject to approved surveillance programmes and Part C of that Annex sets out the list of Member States, zones and compartments declared disease-free with regard to one or more non-exotic diseases.
Del A Priloge I k Odločbi 2009/177/ES določa seznam držav članic, območij in kompartmentov, za katere se uporabljajo odobreni programi za nadziranje, del C navedene priloge pa določa seznam držav članic, območij in kompartmentov, ki so razglašeni za proste ene ali več neeksotičnih bolezni.
Ireland and Hungary have submitted to the Commission applications for the approval of multiannual surveillance programmes as regards Koi herpes virus (KHV) disease.
Irska in Madžarska sta Komisiji predložili vloge za odobritev večletnih programov za nadziranje bolezni, ki jo povzroča Koi herpes virus (KHV).
Those programmes comply with the requirements for approval laid down in Directive 2006/88/EC and Decision 2009/177/EC.
Navedeni programi so v skladu z zahtevami za odobritev iz Direktive 2006/88/ES in Odločbe 2009/177/ES.
Accordingly, they should be approved and included in the list in Part A of Annex I to Decision 2009/177/EC.
Zato jih je treba odobriti in jih vključiti na seznam v delu A Priloge I k Odločbi 2009/177/ES.
The whole territory of Ireland, except Cape Clear Island, is currently listed in Part C of Annex I to Decision 2009/177/EC as declared disease-free for viral haemorrhagic septicaemia (VHS).
Celotno ozemlje Irske, razen otoka Cape Clear, je trenutno na seznamu v delu C Priloge I k Odločbi 2009/177/ES razglašeno za prosto virusne hemoragične septikemije (VHS).
Ireland has notified to the Commission a declaration of freedom from that disease for Cape Clear Island.
Irska je Komisijo obvestila o izjavi o razglasu statusa brez navedene bolezni za otok Cape Clear.
Accordingly, the whole territory of Ireland should be declared free of VHS.
Zato je treba celotno ozemlje Irske razglasiti za prosto bolezni VHS.
Part C of Annex I to Decision 2009/177/EC should be amended accordingly.
Del C Priloge I k Odločbi 2009/177/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Annex I to Decision 2009/177/EC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga I k Odločbi 2009/177/ES se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tem sklepu.
Geographical demarcation of the area under a surveillance programme (Member State, zones or compartments)
Geografska meja območja, za katero se uporablja program za nadziranje (država članica, območje ali kompartment)
All continental areas within its territory
Vsa celinska območja na njegovem ozemlju
the municipalities of Uusikaupunki, Pyhäranta and Rauma
občin Uusikaupunki, Pyhäranta in Rauma
All continental and coastal areas within Great Britain, Northern Ireland, Guernsey, the Isle of Man and Jersey
Vsa celinska in obalna območja znotraj Velike Britanije, Severne Irske, Guerneseyja ter otokov Man in Jersey
All continental and coastal areas within Great Britain, Northern Ireland, Guernsey, the Isle of Man and Jersey except South West Shetland Islands
Vsa celinska in obalna območja znotraj Velike Britanije, Severne Irske, Guerneseyja ter otokov Man in Jersey, razen jugozahodnih Shetlandskih otokov
The whole coastline of Great Britain.
Celotna obala Velike Britanije
The whole coastline of Northern Ireland.
Celotna obala Severne Irske
The whole coastline of Guernsey and Herm.
Celotna obala Guernseyja in Herma
The whole coastline of the Isle of Man.
Celotna obala otoka Man
Galway Bay;
Galway Bayja,
Lough Swilly.
Lough Swillyja
the area containing West Loch Tarbert north east of a line drawn east south east at Ardpatrick Point NR 734578 to North Dunskeig Bay at NR 752568.
območja, ki vključuje West Loch Tarbert, severovzhodno od črte, potegnjene vzhodno jugovzhodno pri Ardpatrick Pointu NR 734578 do North Dunskeig Bayja pri NR 752568
The whole coastline of Northern Ireland, except:
Celotna obala Severne Irske, razen:
Strangford Lough.
Strangford Lougha
The whole coastline of Guernsey, Herm and the Isle of Man.
Celotna obala Guernseyja, Herma in otoka Man
The coastal area of the States of Jersey: the area consists of the intertidal and immediate coastal area between the mean high-water mark on the Island of Jersey and an imaginary line drawn three nautical miles from the mean low water mark of the Island of Jersey.
Obalno območje Jerseyja sestavljata bibavični pas in neposredno obalno območje med srednjim nivojem visoke vode na otoku Jersey in navidezno črto, potegnjeno tri morske milje od srednjega nivoja nizke vode na otoku Jersey.
That declaration was added to the agenda of the meeting of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal health on 12 January 2010.
Izjavi je bila priložena agenda za sestanek Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali za dan 12. januarja 2010.
The declaration complies with the requirements for a declaration of freedom of disease laid down in Directive 2006/88/EC and Decision 2009/177/EC.
Izjava je v skladu z zahtevami za izjave o razglasu statusa brez bolezni iz Direktive 2006/88/ES in Odločbe 2009/177/ES.
(notified under document C(2010) 1707)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 1707)
Having regard to Directive 1999/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 February 1999 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning foods and food ingredients treated with ionising radiation [1], and in particular Article 9(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 1999/2/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. februarja 1999 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o živilih in živilskih sestavinah, obsevanih z ionizirajočim sevanjem [1], ter zlasti člena 9(2) Direktive,
The Commission received an application for approval of three irradiation facilities in India through their competent authorities.
Komisija je od indijskih pristojnih organov prejela vlogo za odobritev treh objektov za obsevanje v Indiji.
Commission experts inspected the irradiation facilities in order to check whether they comply with the requirements of Directive 1999/2/EC and in particular whether official supervision guarantees that they comply with the requirements of Article 7 of that Directive.
Strokovnjaki Komisije so pregledali objekte za obsevanje in preverili, ali izpolnjujejo zahteve iz Direktive 1999/2/ES in zlasti ali uradni nadzor zagotavlja izpolnjevanje zahtev iz člena 7 navedene direktive.
The facilities in India complied with most of the requirements of Directive 1999/2/EC.
Objekti v Indiji so izpolnjevali večino zahtev iz Direktive 1999/2/ES.
The shortcomings identified by the Commission have been adequately addressed by the Indian competent authorities.
Pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je Komisija ugotovila, so indijski pristojni organi ustrezno odpravili.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
Ukrepi, predvideni s tem sklepom, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali –
The Annex to Decision 2002/840/EC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga k Odločbi 2002/840/ES se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k temu sklepu.
The following facilities are added to the list in the Annex to Decision 2002/840/EC:
Na seznam v Prilogi k Odločbi 2002/840/ES se dodajo naslednji objekti:
Reference No: EU-AIF 09-2010
Referenčna št.: EU-AIF 09-2010
Navi Mumbai — 400 705 (Maharashtra)
Navi Mumbai - 400 705 (Maharashtra)
E-mail: chief@britatom.gov.in cebrit@vsnl.net
E-naslov: chief@britatom.gov.in; cebrit@vsnl.net
Reference No: EU-AIF 10-2010
Referenčna št.: EU-AIF 10-2010
Mumbai — 400 085 (Maharashtra)
Mumbai - 400 085 (Maharashtra)
Reference No: EU-AIF 11-2010
Referenčna št.: EU-AIF 11-2010
Bengalooru — 562 106 (Karnataka)
Bengalooru - 562 106 (Karnataka)
E-mail: vikram@microtrol-india.com
E-naslov: vikram@microtrol-india.com
amending Decision 2008/457/EC laying down rules for the implementation of Council Decision 2007/435/EC establishing the European Fund for the Integration of third-country nationals for the period 2007 to 2013 as part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’ as regards Member States management and control systems, the rules for administrative and financial management and the eligibility of expenditure on projects co-financed by the Fund
o spremembi Odločbe 2008/457/ES o določitvi pravil za izvajanje Odločbe Sveta 2007/435/ES o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za vključevanje državljanov tretjih držav za obdobje 2007–2013 v okviru splošnega programa „Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov“ glede sistemov upravljanja in nadzora držav članic, pravil za upravno in finančno upravljanje ter upravičenosti izdatkov za projekte, ki jih sofinancira Sklad
(notified under document C(2010) 1713)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 1713)
Having regard to Council Decision 2007/435/EC of 25 June 2007 establishing the European Fund for the Integration of third-country nationals for the period 2007 to 2013 as part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’ [1], and in particular Article 21 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 2007/435/ES z dne 25. junija 2007 o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za vključevanje državljanov tretjih držav za obdobje 2007–2013 v okviru splošnega programa „Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov“ [1] ter zlasti člena 21 Odločbe,
Decision 2007/435/EC has been implemented by Commission Decision 2008/457/EC [2].
Odločba 2007/435/ES se izvaja z Odločbo Komisije 2008/457/ES [2].
Decision 2008/457/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,
Odločbo 2008/457/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Decision 2008/457/EC is amended as follows:
Odločba 2008/457/ES se spremeni:
With reference to Article 37(3) and (4) of the basic act, the cumulative total of pre-financing payments made to a Member State shall not exceed 90 % of the total amount allocated to such Member State in the financing decision approving the annual programme.
V zvezi s členom 37(3) in (4) temeljnega akta skupni znesek predhodnega financiranja, ki se plača državam članicam, ne presega 90 % skupnega zneska, dodeljenega državi članici v sklepu o financiranju, s katerim se odobri letni program.
Where a Member State has nationally committed less than the total amount allocated by the financing decision approving the annual programme, the cumulative total of the pre-financing payments shall not exceed 90 % of the nationally committed amount.’
Če država članica na nacionalni ravni prevzame obveznosti za manj, kot je skupni znesek, dodeljen s sklepom o financiranju, s katerim se odobri letni program, potem skupni znesek predhodnega financiranja ne presega 90 % zneska, za katerega so bile prevzete obveznosti na nacionalni ravni.“.
on the State aids C 43/07 (ex N 64/07) and C 44/05 (ex NN 79/05, ex N 439/04) granted by Poland to Huta Stalowa Wola SA
o državnih pomočeh C 43/07 (ex N 64/07) in C 44/05 (ex NN 79/05, ex N 439/04) Poljske za Huta Stalowa Wola S.A.
(notified under document C(2009) 1480)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 1480)
(Only the Polish text is authentic)
(Besedilo v poljskem jeziku je edino verodostojno.)
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 88(2) thereof,
Ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 88(2) Pogodbe,
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above,
po pozivu zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi določbami,
By letter of 8 October 2004, Poland informed the Commission about measures granted in support of the restructuring of Huta Stalowa Wola SA (hereinafter referred to as ‘HSW’, ‘the beneficiary’ or ‘the company’), with a view to obtaining legal certainty that they had been granted before accession and were not applicable after accession, and that they did not therefore constitute new aid which could be examined by the Commission under Article 88 of the EC Treaty.
Z dopisom z dne 8. oktobra 2004 je Poljska obvestila Komisijo o ukrepih, odobrenih za prestrukturiranje družbe Huta Stalowa Wola S.A. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba HSW, upravičenka ali družba), s čimer si je želela zagotoviti pravno varnost, da so bili ukrepi dodeljeni pred pristopom in se po pristopu ne uporabljajo ter da zato niso bili nova pomoč, ki bi jo lahko Komisija obravnavala v skladu s členom 88 Pogodbe ES.
In the event that the Commission were to find these measures to be new aid, Poland asked that they be approved as restructuring aid.
Poljska je Komisijo pozvala, naj te ukrepe odobri kot pomoč za prestrukturiranje, če bo ugotovila, da so nova pomoč.
The Commission requested Poland to provide further information by letters of 11 November 2004, 1 March 2005, 27 April 2005 and 26 July 2005, to which Poland replied, respectively, by letters of 31 January 2005, registered on 2 February 2005, of 4 April 2005, registered on 8 April 2005, of 7 June 2005, registered on 9 June 2005 and of 2 September 2005, registered on 6 September 2005.
Komisija je Poljsko pozvala, naj posreduje dodatne informacije, z dopisi z dne 11. novembra 2004, 1. marca 2005, 27. aprila 2005 in 26. julija 2005, na katere je Poljska odgovorila z dopisi z dne 31. januarja 2005 (evidentiran 2. februarja 2005), 4. aprila 2005 (evidentiran 8. aprila 2005), 7. junija 2005 (evidentiran 9. junija 2005), in 2. septembra 2005 (evidentiran 6. septembra 2005).
In the course of this exchange of information it emerged that some of the notified measures had been implemented in contravention of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty.
Med to izmenjavo informacij se je pokazalo, da so bili nekateri priglašeni ukrepi izvedenih v nasprotju s členom 88(3) Pogodbe ES.
By letter of 23 November 2005, the Commission informed Poland that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of those measures.
Z dopisom z dne 23. novembra 2005 je Komisija sporočila Poljski, da bo glede navedenih ukrepov sprožila postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES.
By decision of 20 December 2006 the Commission concluded the formal investigation by declaring restructuring aid in favour of HSW compatible with the common market (‘decision of 20 December 2006’) [2].
Z odločbo z dne 20. decembra 2006 je Komisija končala formalno preiskavo in razglasila pomoč za prestrukturiranje družbe HSW za združljivo s skupnim trgom (v nadaljnjem besedilu: odločba z dne 20. decembra 2006) [2].
The Commission’s examination showed that some aid was granted before Poland’s accession to the EU (PLN 157 million or EUR 37,2 million [3], and some after accession (PLN 66 million or EUR 15,6 million).
Preverjanje, ki ga je opravila Komisija, je pokazalo, da je bil del pomoči dodeljen pred pristopom Poljske k EU (157 milijonov PLN ali 37,2 milijona EUR [3], del pa po pristopu (66 milijonov PLN ali 15,6 milijona EUR).
Poland argued that for internal administrative reasons it had been unable to notify the Commission of the modified plan earlier [4].
Poljska je trdila, da zaradi notranjih upravnih razlogov [4] spremenjenega načrta ni bilo mogoče priglasiti Komisiji pred tem datumom.
On 7 June 2007 a meeting was held between the Polish authorities, the Commission services and HSW’s management.
Poljski organi, službe Komisije in uprava družbe HSW so se srečali 7. junija 2007.
Following the meeting the Commission, by letter of 22 June 2007, requested further information.
Po srečanju je Komisija z dopisom z dne 22. junija 2007 pozvala Poljsko, naj predloži dodatne informacije.
Poland replied by letter of 13 July 2007, registered on that day.
Poljska je odgovorila z dopisom z dne 13. julija 2007, evidentiranim istega dne.
On 10 October 2007, the Commission decided to initiate a formal investigation procedure on the basis of Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty owing to doubts as to whether the modified restructuring plan fulfilled all the conditions set out in the Community Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (‘the 2004 Guidelines’) [5].
Komisija se je 10. oktobra 2007 odločila, da sproži formalni postopek preiskave na podlagi člena 88(2) Pogodbe ES, ker je imela pomisleke, da je spremenjeni načrt prestrukturiranja izpolnjeval vse pogoje iz smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: smernice iz leta 2004) [5].
In this decision the Commission also mentioned the possibility of revoking the decision of 20 December 2006 pursuant to Article 9 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 [6].
Komisija je v tej odločitvi navedla tudi možnost za razveljavitev odločbe z dne 20. decembra 2006 v skladu s členom 9 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 [6].
The Commission’s decision to initiate an investigation procedure under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [7].
Odločitev Komisije, da sproži postopek preiskave v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES, je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [7].
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measure.
Komisija je zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v zvezi z ukrepom.
After being granted an extension of the deadline for the submission of its comments (requests of 30 October 2007 and 6 December 2007, to which the Commission replied in letters of 20 November 2007 and 19 December 2007 respectively), Poland submitted its comments by letter of 15 January 2008, registered on that day.
Poljska je svoje pripombe predložila z dopisom z dne 15. januarja 2008, evidentiranim istega dne, in sicer po odobritvi podaljšanega roka za predložitev pripomb (zahtevka z dne 30. oktobra 2007 in 6. decembra 2007, na katera je Komisija odgovorila z dopisoma z dne 20. novembra 2007 in 19. decembra 2007).
The Commission has also received comments from 13 third parties, including the beneficiary.
Komisija je prejela tudi pripombe 13 tretjih oseb, vključno z upravičenko.
The Commission forwarded the comments received from third parties to Poland by letter of 28 January 2008.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 28. januarja 2008 Poljski posredovala pripombe, ki jih je prejela od tretjih oseb.
On 9 and 14 April 2008, the Polish authorities sent letters to Commissioner Neelie Kroes, to which the Commissioner replied on 28 April 2008, requesting additional information.
Poljski organi so 9. in 14. aprila 2008 poslali dopisa komisarki Neelie Kroes, na katera je odgovorila 28. aprila 2008, pri čemer je zaprosila za dodatne informacije.
Those letters were answered by letters of the Polish authorities dated 4 July 2008, registered on 9 July 2008.
Poljski organi so na ta dopisa odgovorili z dopisoma z dne 4. julija 2008, evidentiranima 9. julija 2008.
By letter of 7 November 2008, registered on that day, Poland submitted additional information.
Poljska je predložila dodatne informacije z dopisom z dne 7. novembra 2008, evidentiranim istega dne.
On 1 December 2008, the Commission sent a request for information to which Poland replied by letter of 22 December 2008, registered on that day.
Komisija je 1. decembra 2008 poslala zahtevek za informacije, na katerega je Poljska odgovorila z dopisom z dne 22. decembra 2008, evidentiranim istega dne.
The Company
Družba
HSW, the beneficiary of the aid and the parent company of the HSW group, is based in Stalowa Wola, which is situated in the Podkarpackie voivodship.
Družba HSW, upravičenka do pomoči in matična družba skupine HSW, ima sedež v Stalowi Woli v Podkarpatskem vojvodstvu.
In February 2006, the group included eight companies in which HSW held at least 51 % of shares (thereby controlling these companies) and 10 in which it held less than 51 %.
Februarja 2006 je skupino sestavljalo osem podjetij, v katerih je imela družba HSW vsaj 51-odstotni delež (s katerim je nadzorovala ta podjetja), in 10 podjetij, v katerih je imela ta družba manj kot 51-odstotni delež.
Companies belonging to the HSW capital group supply each other with materials and services.
Podjetja, ki so vključena v kapitalsko skupino HSW, si vzajemno dobavljajo material in zagotavljajo storitve.
After the parent company, the companies with the highest share capital in the group are HSW-Zakład Zespołów Napędowych Sp. z o.o and HSW-Zakład Zespołów Mechanicznych Sp. z o.o.
Poleg matične družbe sta podjetji z največjim osnovnim kapitalom v skupini podjetje HSW-Zakład Zespołów Napędowych Sp. z o.o in podjetje HSW-Zakład Zespołów Mechanicznych Sp. z o.o.
Sales to companies belonging to the capital group account for 20-30 % of HSW’s total sales.
Prodaja podjetjem iz kapitalske skupine znaša 20–30 % celotne prodaje.
HSW was created in 1937 and initially produced cannon and high alloy steel.
Družba HSW je bila ustanovljena leta 1937 ter je najprej proizvajala tope in visokolegirano jeklo.
Unlike its subsidiary HSW — Zakład Metalurgiczny, it is not a steel producer.
V nasprotju s hčerinskim podjetjem HSW-Zakład Metalurgiczny ne proizvaja jekla.
In 1991 it became a joint-stock company.
Leta 1991 se je preoblikovala v delniško družbo.
The State still owns 76 % of the shares, 9 % belong to employees, and the remaining public and private shareholders hold no more than 5 % each.
Država ima še vedno v lasti 76 % delnic, 9 % jih pripada zaposlenim, drugi javni in zasebni delničarji pa imajo v lasti vsak po največ 5 % delnic.
HSW manufactures construction machinery and military equipment (cannon, howitzers etc.).
Družba HSW proizvaja gradbene stroje in vojaško opremo (tope, havbice itd.).
In 2005 HSW had about 2400 employees, down from 3173 in 2002.
Leta 2002 je imela družba HSW 3173 zaposlenih, leta 2005 pa se je njihovo število zmanjšalo na 2400.
One of the subsidiaries of HSW is the distribution company Dressta Sp. z o.o.
Eno od hčerinskih podjetij družbe HSW je distribucijsko podjetje Dressta Sp. z o.o.
(hereafter ‘Dressta’).
(v nadaljnjem besedilu: podjetje Dressta).
Since September 2006, the latter has been fully controlled by HSW.
Od septembra 2006 podjetje Dressta v celoti pod nadzorom družbe HWS.
Previously, however, 51 % of the shares of Dressta were owned by Komatsu American International Company USA (hereinafter referred to as KAIC), a competitor of HSW.
Vendar je imelo v preteklosti 51 % njegovih delnic v lasti podjetje Komatsu American International Company USA (v nadaljnjem besedilu: KAIC), ki je bilo tekmec družbe HSW.
In 1995 HSW transferred licenses and assets relating to its sales on foreign markets to Dressta for a period of 12 years.
Leta 1995 je družba HSW dovoljenja in sredstva, ki se nanašajo na prodajo njenega blaga na tujih trgih, za 12 let prenesla na podjetje Dressta.
Difficulties of the Company
Težave družbe
The beneficiary’s difficulties began in 2002, when its turnover dropped from PLN 494,9 million (EUR 117,3 million) in 2000 to PLN 352,6 million (EUR 83,5 million), a fall of 29 %.
Težave upravičenke so se začele leta 2002, ko se je njen prihodek zmanjšal s 494,9 milijona PLN (117,3 milijona EUR) leta 2000 na 352,6 milijona PLN (83,5 milijona EUR), kar je zmanjšanje za 29 %.
Its exports fell from PLN 505 million (EUR 119,7 million) to PLN 279 million (EUR 66,1 million).
Njen izvoz se je zmanjšal s 505 milijonov PLN (119,7 milijona EUR) na 279 milijonov PLN (66,1 milijon EUR).
The fall in turnover on foreign markets was primarily attributable to the recession and to the fact that Dressta, under the influence of its principal shareholder (a major competitor of HSW), significantly reduced its sales of HSW’s products on the North American market.
Prihodek na tujih trgih je bil manjši predvsem zaradi recesije in dejstva, da je podjetje Dressta pod vplivom glavnega delničarja (pomembnega konkurenta družbe HSW) znatno zmanjšalo prodajo izdelkov družbe HSW na severnoameriškem trgu.
In 2002 the beneficiary made an operating loss of PLN 33,9 million (EUR 8,03 million), mostly due to underuse of its production capacity.
Leta 2002 je poslovna izguba upravičenke znašala 33,9 milijona PLN (8,03 milijona EUR), predvsem zaradi neizkoriščene proizvodne zmogljivosti.