natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In this case, use of the restricted procedure and the negotiated procedure with the publication of a contract notice would not be feasible, as it would not be possible to define the contract with enough precision to allow candidates to draw up their offers.
V tem primeru ni mogoče uporabiti omejenega postopka in postopka s pogajanji z objavo obvestila o naročilu, ker ne bi bilo mogoče dovolj natančno opredeliti naročila, da bi kandidati lahko pripravili svoje ponudbe.
It is therefore necessary to provide for a flexible procedure ensuring competition between economic operators and allowing the contracting authorities/entities to discuss all aspects of the contract with each candidate.
Zato je treba določiti prilagodljiv postopek, ki hkrati ohranja konkurenco med gospodarskimi subjekti in potrebo naročnikov, da z vsakim kandidatom obravnavajo vse vidike naročila.
However, this procedure must not be used in such a way as to restrict or distort competition, particularly by altering any fundamental aspect of the tender, by imposing substantial new requirements on the successful tenderer or by involving any tenderer other than the one selected as the most economically advantageous.
Vendar se ta postopek ne bi smel uporabljati tako, da omejuje ali izkrivlja konkurenco, zlasti ne s spreminjanjem osnovnih vidikov ponudb ali z uvajanjem bistvenih novih zahtev za uspešnega ponudnika ali z vključitvijo katerega koli drugega ponudnika, razen tistega, ki je izbran kot ekonomsko najugodnejši.
Before launching a procedure for the award of a contract, contracting authorities/entities may, using a technical dialogue, seek or accept advice which may be used in the preparation of specifications, provided, however, that such advice does not have the effect of precluding competition.
Pred začetkom postopka oddaje naročila lahko naročniki v okviru tehničnega dialoga zaprosijo ali prejmejo ali upoštevajo nasvete, ki jih lahko uporabijo pri pripravi razpisne dokumentacije, vendar le pod pogojem, da ti nasveti ne preprečujejo konkurence.
Use of the negotiated procedure with publication of a contract notice could be impossible or entirely inappropriate in certain exceptional circumstances.
V določenih izrednih okoliščinah je lahko uporaba postopka s pogajanji z objavo obvestila o naročilu nemogoča ali povsem neprimerna.
The contracting authorities/entities should thus, in certain very specific cases and circumstances, be able to use the negotiated procedure without publication of a contract notice.
Naročniki bi morali zato imeti možnost, da v nekaterih točno določenih primerih in okoliščinah uporabijo postopek s pogajanji brez objave obvestila o naročilu.
Certain circumstances should be partly the same as those provided for in Directive 2004/18/EC.
Nekatere okoliščine bi morale biti deloma iste, kot jih določa Direktiva 2004/18/ES.
In this respect, consideration should be given in particular to the fact that defence and security equipment is often technically complex.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba zlasti upoštevati, da je obrambna in varnostna oprema pogosto tehnično zapletena.
Consequently, incompatibility or disproportionate technical difficulties in operation and maintenance justifying the use of the negotiated procedure without publication of a contract notice in the case of supply contracts for additional deliveries should be assessed in the light of this complexity and the associated requirements for interoperability and standardisation of equipment.
Posledično bi bilo treba nezdružljivost in nesorazmernost tehničnih težav pri uporabi in vzdrževanju, ki upravičujejo uporabo postopka s pogajanji brez objave v primeru naročil blaga za dodatne dobave, presojati z vidika te zapletenosti ter s tem povezanih zahtev po interoperabilnosti in standardizaciji opreme.
This is the case, for example, for the integration of new components into existing systems or for the modernisation of such systems.
To na primer velja za vključitev novih elementov v obstoječe sisteme ali posodobitev teh sistemov.
It may be the case for certain purchases within the scope of this Directive that only one economic operator is able to execute the contract because it holds exclusive rights, or for technical reasons.
Lahko pride do situacije, ko je pri nekaterih nakupih v okviru te direktive le en gospodarski subjekt lahko izpolni naročilo, ker je imetnik izključne pravice ali iz tehničnih razlogov.
In such cases, the contracting authority/entity should be allowed to award contracts or framework agreements directly to that economic operator.
V takšnih primerih bi moral naročnik imeti možnost, da odda naročilo ali sklene okvirni sporazum neposredno s tem gospodarskim subjektom.
However, technical reasons for only one economic operator being able to execute a contract should be rigorously defined and justified on a case-by-case basis.
Vendar bi morali biti tehnični razlogi, ki upravičujejo dejstvo, da lahko le en gospodarski subjekt izpolni pogodbo, strogo določeni in upravičeni v vsakem primeru posebej.
They could include, for instance, strict technical impracticability for a candidate other than the chosen economic operator to achieve the required goals, or the necessity to use specific know-how, tools or means which only one operator has at its disposal.
Lahko bi denimo vključevali absolutno tehnično nezmožnost, da kandidat, ki ni izbran gospodarski subjekt, doseže zahtevane cilje, ali potrebo po uporabi posebnega znanja, orodij ali sredstev, ki jih ima na razpolago le en gospodarski subjekt.
This may be the case, for example, for the modification or retrofitting of particularly complex equipment.
Do tega lahko pride denimo pri spremembah ali naknadni vgradnji posebej zapletene opreme.
Technical reasons may also derive from specific interoperability or safety requirements which must be fulfilled in order to ensure the functioning of the armed forces or security forces.
Tehnični razlogi lahko izvirajo tudi iz posebnih zahtev glede interoperabilnosti ali varnosti, ki jih je treba izpolniti, da se zagotovi delovanje oboroženih ali varnostnih sil.
The specific nature of the contracts subject to this Directive also demonstrates the need to provide for new circumstances which may arise in the fields covered by it.
Poleg tega posebnost naročil, za katere velja ta direktiva, kaže, da je treba določiti nove okoliščine, ki lahko nastanejo na področjih, ki jih pokriva direktiva.
The armed forces of Member States may, for example, be called on to intervene in crisis situations abroad, for instance as part of peace-keeping operations.
Oborožene sile držav članic lahko na primer posredujejo v kriznih situacijah v tujini, denimo v okviru mirovnih operacij.
At the launch, or during the course, of such an intervention, the security of Member States and their armed forces may necessitate the award of certain contracts at a speed which is incompatible with the usual deadlines imposed by the award procedures laid down by this Directive.
Ob začetku take intervencije ali med njo je lahko zaradi varnosti držav članic in njihovih oboroženih sil treba oddati nekatera naročila, katerih hitrost izvedbe ni združljiva z roki, ki jih nalagajo postopki za oddajo naročil, določeni s to direktivo.
Such emergencies could also arise for the security forces, for example in the case of a terrorist attack on the territory of the Union.
Taki nujni primeri lahko nastanejo tudi za potrebe varnostnih sil, na primer v primeru terorističnega napada na ozemlju Unije.
Stimulating research and development is a key way of strengthening the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base, and the opening-up of procurement helps to achieve this objective.
Spodbujanje raziskovanja in razvoja je ključno sredstvo za krepitev baze obrambne tehnologije in industrije Unije, odpiranje naročil pa prispeva k temu cilju.
The importance of research and development in this specific field justifies maximum flexibility in the award of contracts for research supplies and services.
Pomen raziskav in razvoja na tem posebnem področju upravičuje največjo prožnost pri oddaji naročil za blago in storitve na področju raziskav.
At the same time, however, this flexibility should not preclude fair competition in the later phases of the life cycle of a product.
Istočasno pa ta prožnost ne bi smela preprečiti poštene konkurence za poznejše faze življenjskega ciklusa proizvoda.
Research and development contracts should therefore cover activities only up to the stage where the maturity of new technologies can be reasonably assessed and de-risked.
Naročila za raziskave in razvoj bi zato morala zajemati dejavnosti le do faze, ko je mogoče stopnjo razvoja novih tehnologij razumno oceniti in se zmanjša njihova tveganost.
Research and development contracts should not be used beyond that stage as means of avoiding the provisions of this Directive, including by predetermining the choice of tenderer for the later phases.
Naročila za raziskave in razvoj ne bi smela biti uporabljena preko te faze z namenom izogniti se določbam te direktive, vključno z vnaprejšnjim izbiranjem ponudnika za poznejše faze.
On the other hand, the contracting authority/entity should not have to organise a separate tender for the later phases if the contract which covers the research activities already includes an option for those phases and was awarded through a restricted procedure or a negotiated procedure with the publication of a contract notice, or, where applicable, a competitive dialogue.
Po drugi strani pa naročnik naj ne bi bilo treba organizirati posebne izbire ponudbe za poznejše faze, če naročilo, ki vključuje raziskovalne dejavnosti, že vključuje možnost teh faz in je bilo dodeljeno z omejenim postopkom ali s postopkom s pogajanji z objavo obvestila o naročilu, ali, kjer je to mogoče, s konkurenčnim dialogom.
In order to ensure transparency, provision should be made for rules on publication by the contracting authorities/entities of appropriate information prior to, and at the end of, the award procedure.
Da se zagotovi preglednost, bi bilo treba vključiti določbe o objavi ustreznih informacij s strani naročnika pred in na koncu postopka dodelitve.
In addition, further specific information should be provided to candidates and tenderers regarding the results of that procedure.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba kandidatom in ponudnikom posredovati podrobne informacije o izidu tega postopka.
However, contracting authorities/entities should be allowed to withhold some of the information so required when and insofar as its release would impede law enforcement or otherwise be contrary to the public interest, harm the legitimate commercial interests of economic operators or might prejudice fair competition between them.
Vendar bi moralo biti naročnikom dovoljeno, da izpustijo objavo nekaterih informacij, če bi ovirala izvajanje zakona ali bi bila sicer v nasprotju z javnim interesom, če bi škodila bodisi zakonitim poslovnim interesom javnih ali zasebnih gospodarskih subjektov bodisi posegala v pošteno konkurenco med njimi.
In the light of the nature and the features of the works, supplies and services covered by this Directive, grounds of public interest relating to compliance with national mandatory provisions falling within the scope of national public policy, notably with regard to defence and security, are of particular relevance in this regard.
Glede na naravo gradenj, blaga in storitev, ki jih zajema ta direktiva, so razlogi javnega interesa v zvezi s spoštovanjem nacionalnih zavezujočih določb, ki sodijo v nacionalni javni red, zlasti v zvezi z obrambo in varnostjo, posebej pomembni.
In view of new developments in information and communications technology, and the simplifications these can bring, electronic means should be put on a par with traditional means of communication and information exchange.
Zaradi razvoja informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije ter poenostavitev, ki jih lahko prinesejo, bi bilo treba elektronska sredstva izenačiti z običajnimi komunikacijskimi sredstvi in sredstvi za izmenjavo informacij.
As far as possible, the means and technology chosen should be compatible with the technologies used in other Member States.
Izbrana sredstva in tehnologija bi morala biti, kolikor je mogoče, skladna s tehnologijami, ki se uporabljajo v drugih državah članicah.
To ensure the development of effective competition in the field of procurement covered by this Directive, it is necessary that contract notices drawn up by the contracting authorities/entities of Member States be advertised throughout the Community.
Za zagotovitev razvoja učinkovite konkurence na področju naročil, ki so zajeta s to direktivo, je treba obvestila o naročilih, ki jih pripravijo naročniki iz držav članic, oglaševati po vsej Skupnosti.
The information contained in these notices must enable economic operators in the Community to determine whether the proposed contracts are of interest to them.
Informacije v teh objavah morajo gospodarskim subjektom v Skupnosti omogočati, da ugotovijo, ali so predlagana naročila zanimiva zanje.
For this purpose, they must be given adequate information as regards the subject-matter of the contract and the conditions attached thereto.
Zato jim je treba ponuditi ustrezne informacije o predmetu naročila in o pogojih v zvezi z njim.
Improved visibility should therefore be ensured for public notices by means of appropriate instruments, such as standard contract notice forms and the CPV, which is the reference nomenclature for contracts.
Treba je torej zagotoviti boljšo vidnost javnih razpisov z ustreznimi instrumenti, kot so standardni obrazci za objave o naročilu in CPV, ki je referenčna nomenklatura za naročila.
Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures [11] and Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the internal market (Directive on electronic commerce) [12] should, in the context of this Directive, apply to the transmission of information by electronic means.
Za pošiljanje informacij z elektronskimi sredstvi bi bilo treba v okviru te direktive uporabljati Direktivo 1999/93/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. decembra 1999 o okviru Skupnosti za elektronski podpis [11] in Direktivo 2000/31/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2000 o nekaterih pravnih vidikih storitev informacijske družbe, zlasti elektronskega poslovanja, na notranjem trgu (Direktiva o elektronskem poslovanju) [12].
Procurement procedures require a level of security and confidentiality higher than that required by those Directives.
Postopki za oddajo naročil zahtevajo stopnjo varovanja in zaupnosti, ki je večja od tiste iz navedenih direktiv.
Accordingly, devices for the electronic receipt of offers and requests to participate should comply with specific additional requirements.
Glede na to bi morala biti sredstva za elektronsko sprejemanje prijav za sodelovanje in ponudb v skladu s posebnimi dodatnimi zahtevami.
To this end, the use of electronic signatures, in particular advanced electronic signatures, should be encouraged to as great an extent as possible.
V ta namen bi bilo treba, kolikor je mogoče, spodbujati uporabo elektronskih podpisov, zlasti izpopolnjenega elektronskega podpisa.
Moreover, the existence of voluntary accreditation schemes could constitute a favourable framework for enhancing the level of certification service provision for these devices.
Poleg tega bi lahko prostovoljni sistem akreditacije predstavljal pozitiven okvir za izboljšanje kakovosti storitev potrjevanja v zvezi s temi sredstvi.
The use of electronic means leads to savings in time.
Uporaba elektronskih sredstev prihrani čas.
As a result, provision should be made for reducing the minimum time-limits for receipt of offers and requests to participate where electronic means are used, subject however to the condition that they are compatible with the specific modes of transmission envisaged at Community level.
Zato bi bilo treba predvideti skrajšanje minimalnih rokov za sprejemanje ponudb in prijav za sodelovanje, kadar se uporabljajo elektronska sredstva, pod pogojem, da so uporabljena elektronska sredstva v skladu s posebnim načinom pošiljanja, določenim na ravni Skupnosti.
Verification of the suitability of candidates and the selection thereof should be carried out in transparent conditions.
Preverjanje sposobnosti ponudnikov in njihova izbira bi se morala opraviti na pregleden način.
For this purpose, non-discriminatory criteria should be indicated which the contracting authorities/entities may use when selecting competitors and the means which economic operators may use to prove they have satisfied those criteria.
Zato bi bilo treba navesti nediskriminatorna merila, ki jih lahko naročniki uporabijo pri izbiri tekmecev, in sredstva, ki jih gospodarski subjekti lahko uporabijo kot dokaz, da izpolnjujejo ta merila.
In the same spirit of transparency, the contracting authority/entity should be required, as soon as a contract is put out to competition, to indicate the selection criteria it will use and the level of specific competence it may, where appropriate, demand of economic operators before admitting them to the procurement procedure.
V tem smislu preglednosti bi bilo treba takoj po razpisu naročila od naročnika zahtevati, da navede merila za izbor, ki jih bo uporabil, ter raven posebne usposobljenosti, ki jo, kadar je primerno, lahko zahteva od gospodarskih subjektov za sodelovanje v postopku za oddajo naročila.
A contracting authority/entity may limit the number of candidates in the restricted and negotiated procedures with publication of a contract notice and in a competitive dialogue.
Naročnik lahko omeji število kandidatov v omejenih postopkih in postopkih s pogajanji po objavi obvestila o naročilu ter v konkurenčnem dialogu.
Any reduction in the number of candidates should be performed on the basis of objective criteria indicated in the contract notice.
Vsako zmanjšanje števila kandidatov bi bilo treba izvesti na podlagi objektivnih meril, navedenih v obvestilu o naročilu.
For criteria relating to the personal situation of economic operators, a general reference in the contract notice to the situations set out in this Directive may suffice.
Za merila v zvezi z osebnim položajem gospodarskih subjektov zadostuje splošno sklicevanje v obvestilu o naročilu na razmere, določene v tej direktivi.
The relevant Community rules on the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates or other evidence of formal qualifications apply when evidence of a particular qualification is required for participation in a procurement procedure.
Kadar se za sodelovanje v postopku oddaje naročila zahteva dokazilo o posebni usposobljenosti, veljajo ustrezna pravila Skupnosti o vzajemnem priznavanju diplom, spričeval in drugih dokazil o formalni usposobljenosti.
The award of contracts to economic operators which have participated in a criminal organisation or which have been found guilty of corruption or fraud to the detriment of the financial interests of the European Communities, money laundering, the financing of terrorism or terrorist and terrorism-related offences, should be avoided.
Oddaji naročil gospodarskim subjektom, ki so sodelovali v hudodelski združbi ali ki so bili obtoženi za kazniva dejanja korupcije in goljufije v škodo finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti, pranja denarja ali financiranja terorizma ali terorističnih kaznivih dejanj ali dejanj, povezanih s terorizmom, bi se bilo treba izogibati.
Where appropriate, the contracting authorities/entities should ask candidates or tenderers to supply relevant documents and, where they have doubts concerning the personal situation of a candidate or tenderer, may seek the cooperation of the competent authorities of the Member State concerned.
Kadar je to primerno, bi morali naročniki od kandidatov ali ponudnikov zahtevati, da predložijo ustrezne dokumente, ter lahko v primeru dvomov o osebnem položaju teh kandidatov ali ponudnikov zaprosijo pristojne organe zadevne države članice za sodelovanje.
Such economic operators should be excluded as soon as the contracting authority/entity has knowledge of a judgment concerning such offences rendered in accordance with national law that has the force of res judicata.
Te gospodarske subjekte bi bilo treba izključiti takoj, ko naročnik izve za sodno odločbo v zvezi s takimi dejanji, ki je izdana v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo in je pravnomočna.
If national law contains provisions to this effect, non-compliance with procurement legislation on unlawful agreements which has been the subject of a final judgment or a decision having equivalent effect may be considered an offence concerning the professional conduct of the economic operator concerned or grave misconduct.
Če nacionalna zakonodaja vsebuje določbe v zvezi s tem, se neupoštevanje zakonodaje o nezakonitih dogovorih pri naročilu, za katero je bila izdana pravnomočna sodba ali odločba z enakim učinkom, lahko obravnava kot prekršek v zvezi s poklicnim ravnanjem gospodarskega subjekta ali kot huda kršitev.
It should also be possible to exclude economic operators if the contracting authority/entity has information, where applicable provided by protected sources, establishing that they are not sufficiently reliable so as to exclude risks to the security of the Member State.
Prav tako bi moralo biti mogoče izključiti gospodarske subjekte, če ima naročnik informacije (ki jih po potrebi posredujejo zaupni viri), o tem, da ti subjekti niso dovolj zanesljivi, da bi bilo mogoče izključiti tveganje za varnost države članice.
Such risks could derive from certain features of the products supplied by the candidate, or from the shareholding structure of the candidate.
Takšna tveganja lahko izvirajo iz določenih lastnosti proizvoda, ki ga dobavlja kandidat ali delniška struktura kandidata.
Non-compliance with national provisions implementing Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation [13] and Council Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions [14] which has been the subject of a final judgment or a decision having equivalent effect may be considered an offence concerning the professional conduct of the economic operator concerned or grave misconduct.
Neupoštevanje nacionalnih določb za izvajanje Direktive Sveta 2000/78/ES z dne 27. novembra 2000 o splošnih okvirih enakega obravnavanja pri zaposlovanju in delu [13] in Direktive Sveta 76/207/EGS z dne 9. februarja 1976 o izvrševanju načela enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk v zvezi z dostopom do zaposlitve, poklicnega usposabljanja in napredovanja ter delovnih pogojev [14], ki je bilo predmet pravnomočne sodbe ali odločbe z enakim učinkom, se lahko obravnava kot prekršek, ki zadeva poklicno ravnanje zadevnega gospodarskega subjekta, ali kot huda kršitev.
Given the sensitive nature of the defence and security sectors, the reliability of economic operators to which contracts are awarded is vital.
Zaradi občutljivosti sektorjev obrambe in varnosti je zanesljivost gospodarskih subjektov, ki jim je naročilo oddano, ključnega pomena.
This reliability depends, in particular, on their ability to respond to requirements imposed by the contracting authority/entity with respect to security of supply and security of information.
Ta zanesljivost je zlasti odvisna od njihove zmogljivosti, da izpolnijo zahteve naročnika glede zanesljivosti oskrbe in varovanja informacij.