natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
There are many different parameters defining the properties of a tube, which explains why most of the SPT are made upon customers’ order.
Obstaja veliko različnih parametrov, ki določajo lastnosti cevi, zato je večina BC izdelanih po naročilu strank.
The investigation has shown that, despite differences in final applications of various types of seamless pipes and tubes, the different types of the product concerned all share the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo vsi tipi zadevnega izdelka kljub razlikam v končni uporabi različnih vrst brezšivnih cevi enake osnovne fizikalne, kemijske in tehnične lastnosti.
They are therefore considered to constitute one single product.
Zato se šteje, da sestavljajo en izdelek.
An association of Chinese producers claimed that OCTG pipes and tubes should be excluded from the definition of product concerned because they have different uses, different specifications, and different characteristics and are not interchangeable with other pipes and tubes, and the volumes of export from the PRC to the EU are limited.
Združenje kitajskih proizvajalcev je ugotovilo, da je treba cevi OCTG izključiti iz opredelitve zadevnega izdelka, ker imajo različne uporabe, različne specifikacije in različne lastnosti ter niso zamenljive z drugimi cevmi, obseg izvoza iz LRK v EU pa je omejen.
However, the investigation showed that OCTG pipes and tubes have, inter alia, comparable chemical characteristics to other SPT types since they all fall within the 0,86 CEV threshold.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da imajo cevi OCTG med drugim kemijske lastnosti, primerljive s kemijskimi lastnostmi drugih vrst BC, saj za vse velja prag 0,86 CEV.
Furthermore, they share other basic characteristics with the remaining SPT types, such as outside diameter and wall thickness.
Poleg tega imajo druge skupne osnovne lastnosti s preostalimi vrstami BC, kot sta na primer zunanji premer in debelina sten.
As far as the end-uses of the OCTG pipes and tubes are concerned, it was found that certain OCTG pipes and tubes are interchangeable with other non-alloy steel tubes.
V zvezi s končnimi uporabami cevi OCTG je bilo ugotovljeno, da so nekatere cevi OCTG zamenljive z drugimi nelegiranimi jeklenimi cevmi.
Given that OCTG pipes and tubes have the same essential characteristics as other seamless pipes and tubes and they are interchangeable to a certain extent, it was provisionally concluded that there were no grounds to exclude this type from the product definition.
Glede na to, da imajo cevi OCTG enake osnovne lastnosti kot druge brezšivne cevi in so delno medsebojno zamenljive, je bilo začasno sklenjeno, da ni razloga za izključitev te vrste iz opredelitve izdelka.
The product concerned and the seamless pipes and tubes produced and sold on the domestic market of the PRC, and on the domestic market of the USA, which served provisionally as an analogue country, as well as the seamless pipes and tubes produced and sold in the Community by the Community industry were found to have the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and uses.
Za zadevni izdelek in brezšivne cevi, proizvedene in prodane na notranjem trgu LRK ter na notranjem trgu ZDA, ki so bile začasno uporabljene kot primerljiva država, ter brezšivne cevi, ki jih industrija Skupnosti proizvede in proda v Skupnosti, je bilo ugotovljeno, da imajo enake osnovne fizikalne, kemijske in tehnične lastnosti in uporabe.
Therefore, these products are provisionally considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se začasno šteje, da so ti izdelki podobni v skladu s členom 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
Briefly, and for ease of reference only, these criteria are set out in summarised form below:
Ta merila so zaradi večje jasnosti povzeta tako:
business decisions and costs are made in response to market conditions and without significant State interference;
poslovne odločitve in stroški so odziv na tržne pogoje in država se vanje pretirano ne vmešava;
In the present investigation, three of the sampled exporting producers requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation and replied to the MET claim form within the given deadlines:
Trije vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki so v tej preiskavi zahtevali TGO v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe in so v predpisanih rokih izpolnili obrazec zahtevka za TGO:
For the abovementioned cooperating exporting producers, the Commission sought all information deemed necessary and verified the information submitted in the MET claim at the premises of the companies in question as deemed necessary.
Komisija je pridobila vse potrebne informacije o zgoraj navedenih sodelujočih proizvajalcih izvoznikih in po potrebi preverila informacije, navedene v zahtevku za TGO, v prostorih zadevnih družb.
The investigation revealed that MET could not be granted to any of the three Chinese company groups as none of them fulfilled all the criteria set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, for the following reasons.
Preiskava je pokazala, da TGO ni mogoče odobriti nobeni od treh skupin kitajskih družb, saj nobena ni izpolnjevala vseh meril iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe iz naslednjih razlogov.
All three (groups of) companies failed to demonstrate that they fulfil criterion 3 and significant distortions appear to have been carried over from the former non-market economy system – i.e. all three (groups of) companies benefited form preferential tax treatment and two (groups of) companies obtained assets below market value.
Nobena od treh (skupin) družb ni dokazala, da izpolnjuje merilo 3, in zdi se, da so se iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva prenesla znatna izkrivljanja – tj. vse tri družbe (skupine družb) so imele ugodnosti od preferenčne davčne obravnave, dve družbi (skupini družb) sta dobili sredstva pod tržno vrednostjo.
Following disclosure of the MET findings two (groups of) companies claimed that the fact that they enjoyed special tax benefits could not be in contradiction with regard to criterion 3 as tax reductions would be applied in market economy countries as well.
Po razkritju ugotovitev TGO sta dve družbi (skupini družb) trdili, da dejstvo, da sta imeli posebne davčne ugodnosti, ne more biti v nasprotju z merilom 3, saj bi se znižanja davkov uporabljala tudi v državah s tržnim gospodarstvom.
The third (group of) company(-ies) claimed that the tax benefit they enjoyed is not applicable anymore since 1 January 2008 and that it was a one-off tax reduction scheme that could not have any impact on the company costs in the following years and that on top of it the tax exemption was very minor.
Tretja družba (skupina družb) je trdila, da davčna ugodnost, ki jo je imela, od 1. januarja 2008 ne velja več in da je bilo znižanje davkov izvedeno na podlagi enkratne davčne ureditve, ki ni mogla vplivati na stroške podjetja v naslednjih letih, ter da je bila poleg tega davčna oprostitev zelo majhna.
It is noted that this group of companies benefited from the tax reduction for domestically bought machinery in 2006 as well as in 2007 (i.e. during the IP).
Ta skupina družb je imela koristi od znižanja davkov za stroje, kupljene na notranjem trgu v letih 2006 in 2007 (tj. v OP).
The benefit received cannot be considered insignificant and consequently it is concluded that it clearly had an important impact on costs and prices during the IP.
Prejete ugodnosti ni mogoče obravnavati kot zanemarljive, zato se ugotavlja, da je zagotovo pomembno vplivala na stroške in cene v OP.
In addition, two (groups of) companies did not fulfil criterion 2 concerning accounting as one was found to offset accounts payable and receivables and the other had no complete financial statements and accrual principle was not applied consistently.
Poleg tega dve družbi (skupini družb) nista izpolnjevali merila 2 v zvezi z računovodstvom, saj je bilo ugotovljeno, da je ena družba opravila pobotanje obveznosti in terjatev računovodskih izkazov, druga družba pa ni imela popolnih računovodskih izkazov, pri čemer se obračunsko načelo ni dosledno uporabljalo.
Following disclosure of the MET findings one company claimed that because of its small size, the fact that it is not stock listed and that it is placed in a rural area, International Accounting Standards (IAS) would not be binding.
Po razkritju ugotovitev TGO je ena družba trdila, da zaradi majhnosti, dejstva, da ne kotira na borzi, in sedeža na podeželju zanjo mednarodni računovodski standardi niso zavezujoči.
This claim however has to be rejected as the breaches found were very serious, notably the audited accounts were incomplete in important areas and the accrual principle was not respected.
Vendar je treba ta zahtevek zavrniti, saj so bile ugotovljene zelo resne kršitve, zlasti so bila revidirana letna poročila nepopolna na pomembnih področjih, prav tako pa ni bilo upoštevano obračunsko načelo.
These rather basic accounting principles have to be respected regardless of the legal status of the company, its size and location.
Ta osnovna računovodska načela je treba upoštevati ne glede na pravni status, velikost in sedež družbe.
The other group of companies claimed that the auditor insured that the balance sheet in the audited financial statement is in line with IAS and re-classified the already offset accounts as receivables and payables.
Druga skupina družb je trdila, da je revizor zagotovil, da je bilanca stanja v revidiranem računovodskem izkazu v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi in je znova razvrstila že pobotane računovodske izkaze kot terjatve in obveznosti.
It is noted that this claim was not made before the disclosure and in particular not during the verification visit and consequently cannot be verified.
Ugotavlja se, da ta zahtevek ni bil vložen pred razkritjem in zlasti ne med preveritvenim obiskom, zato ga ni mogoče preveriti.
It is moreover noted that the said group of companies does not deny the offsetting practice, which in itself is simply not in line with IAS.
Poleg tega se ugotavlja, da navedena skupina družb ne zanika prakse pobotanja, ki že sama po sebi ni v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi.
Consequently, the argument is rejected.
Ta zahtevek se zato zavrne.
Moreover, two groups of companies have not shown that decisions regarding their costs and inputs are made in response to market signals and without significant State interference, and therefore have not demonstrated that criterion 1 is fulfilled.
Poleg tega dve skupini družb nista dokazali, da odločitve v zvezi s stroški in vlaganji sprejemata kot odgovor na tržne signale in brez večjega vmešavanja države, zato nista dokazali, da izpolnjujeta merilo 1.
Following disclosure, one company argued that the reasons invoked to reject the fulfilment of this criterion would not be based on objective evidence as the company would be free in its sales and pricing decision despite the stipulation found in its audited financial statements regarding pricing policy between associated parties.
Ena družba je po razkritju trdila, da navedeni razlogi za neizpolnjevanje tega merila ne temeljijo na objektivnih dokazih, saj naj bi bila družba svobodna pri odločanju o prodaji in cenah kljub določbi v njenih revidiranih računovodskih izkazih v zvezi s cenovno politiko med povezanimi strankami.
The company argued that this was not a restriction, but rather a disclosure requirement to the auditor when reviewing transactions amongst ‘associated parties’.
Družba je trdila, da to ni omejitev, ampak zahteva za razkritje podatkov revizorju pri pregledu transakcij med „povezanimi strankami“.
However, this statement is not a sufficient explanation for an explicit stipulation in the audited financial statements that ‘where the price is determined by the state commodity department, then price of the state commodity department should prevail’.
Vseeno ta izjava ni zadostna razlaga za izrecno določbo v revidiranih računovodskih izkazih, v kateri je navedeno, da „če ceno določi državni blagovni oddelek, mora prevladati cena tega oddelka“.
The other company claimed that despite the fact that they are majority State-owned, it is in fact mainly controlled by a private enterprise and is free from State interference.
Druga družba je trdila, da jo kljub dejstvu, da je večinoma v lasti države, dejansko nadzoruje zasebno podjetje brez vmešavanja države.
The company, however, did not provide any new arguments that could alter the conclusion that considering the actual composition of the board of directors with majority of directors representing State-owned enterprises, the State interference cannot be excluded and that the company has not shown that the decisions are made without significant State interference and consequently failed this criterion.
Vendar družba ni navedla nobenih novih argumentov, ki bi lahko spremenili odločitev, da glede na dejansko sestavo sveta direktorjev, pri čemer večina direktorjev zastopa državna podjetja, vmešavanje države ne more biti izključeno, in da družba ni dokazala, da se odločitve sprejemajo brez večjega vmešavanja države, zato ni izpolnila tega merila.
It is also noted that the disclosure of the MET findings for this group of companies included an example of a decision taken not in response to market signals and possibly under undue State influence (rental of land use right for free) and the company did not comment.
Ugotavlja se tudi, da je razkritje ugotovitev TGO za to skupino družb vključevalo primer odločitve, ki ni bila sprejeta kot odgovor na tržne signale, ampak morda pod prevelikim vplivom države (brezplačen najem pravice do uporabe zemljišč), družba pa ni imela nobenih pripomb.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, a countrywide duty, if any, is established for countries falling under that Article, except in those cases where companies are able to demonstrate that they meet all criteria set out in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe se za države, ki jih zajema navedeni člen, po potrebi vzpostavi dajatev na ravni države, razen v primerih, ko lahko družbe dokažejo, da izpolnjujejo vsa merila iz člena 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
All three Chinese companies or company groups, which requested MET, also claimed IT in the event that they would not be granted MET.
Vse tri kitajske družbe ali skupine družb, ki so zahtevale TGO, so zahtevale tudi IO, če jim ne bi bil odobren TGO.
On the basis of the information available, it was found that two of the three companies or company groups demonstrated that they cumulatively met all the requirements for IT as set forth in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij je bilo ugotovljeno, da sta dve družbi ali skupini družb od treh dokazali, da v celoti izpolnjujeta vse zahteve za IO iz člena 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
As far as the third company or company group is concerned, the majority of its shares are owned by the State.
Večina delnic tretje družbe ali skupine družb je v lasti države.
In addition, given the majority shareholding of the State, and its significant influence on the Chinese steel industry, possible circumvention cannot be excluded.
Tudi zato, ker je večina delnic v lasti države, ki ima velik vpliv na kitajsko jeklarstvo, mogočega izogibanja ni mogoče izključiti.
It was therefore concluded that IT should be granted to the following two exporting companies only:
Na podlagi tega je bilo sklenjeno, da se IO odobri le naslednjima dvema družbama izvoznicama:
In accordance with Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, normal value for companies to which MET could not be granted was established on the basis of the prices or constructed value in an analogue country.
V skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe je bila normalna vrednost za družbe, ki jim TGO ni bilo mogoče odobriti, določena na podlagi cen ali konstruirane vrednosti v primerljivi državi.
In the notice of initiation, the Commission indicated its intention to use the USA as an appropriate analogue country for the purpose of establishing normal value for the PRC and invited interested parties to comment on this.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku navedla, da namerava uporabiti ZDA kot ustrezno primerljivo državo za določitev normalne vrednosti za LRK, in pozvala zainteresirane stranke, da predložijo svoje pripombe v zvezi s tem.
One interested party commented on the choice of analogue country and suggested that Ukraine or India would be more appropriate for establishing a normal value.
Ena zainteresirana stranka je komentirala izbiro primerljive države in predlagala, da bi bili Ukrajina ali Indija primernejši za določitev normalne vrednosti.
The Ukraine was claimed to be a more appropriate choice as besides having free competition on its market, the production process and access to raw material would be similar to the situation in the PRC.
Ukrajina naj bi bila primernejša izbira, saj bi bila proizvodni proces in dostop do surovin poleg svobodne konkurence na njenem trgu podobna razmeram v LRK.
It is noted that since 30 June 2006, there are anti-dumping duties imposed on imports of SPT originating in the Ukraine ranging between 12,3 % and 25,7 %.
Ugotavlja se, da so bile 30. junija 2006 uvedene protidampinške dajatve na uvoz BC s poreklom iz Ukrajine, ki se gibljejo med 12,3 % in 25,7 %.
Although there are several producers on the Ukrainian market, the fact that dumping was found in 2006 points to possibly distorted market conditions and it appears doubtful to use those domestic prices and costs.
Čeprav je na ukrajinskem trgu več proizvajalcev, dejstvo, da je bil leta 2006 ugotovljen damping, kaže, da so morda tržne razmere izkrivljene, zato bi bilo dvomljivo uporabljati te domače cene in stroške.
In any event, no Ukrainian producer cooperated with the investigation.
Vsekakor noben ukrajinski proizvajalec ni sodeloval pri preiskavi.
The same interested party claimed that India would also be a better alternative than the USA and provided the name of an Indian producer of the like product.
Ista zainteresirana stranka je trdila, da bi bila tudi Indija boljša nadomestna možnost kot ZDA, ter navedla ime indijskega proizvajalca podobnega izdelka.
This producer, however, was not willing to cooperate.
Vendar ta proizvajalec ni želel sodelovati.
Considering that there is no cooperation offered by Indian producers, India cannot be selected as analogue country.
Glede na to, da indijski proizvajalci niso želeli sodelovati, Indije ni mogoče izbrati za primerljivo državo.
Moreover, the size of the US market, the number of domestic producers and the significant quantities of imports indicate that the US market is competitive and therefore provisionally selected as the most appropriate analogue country.
Poleg tega velikost trga ZDA, število domačih proizvajalcev in velik obseg uvoza nakazujejo, da je trg ZDA konkurenčen, zato so bile ZDA začasno izbrane za najustreznejšo primerljivo državo.
As indicated under recital 10 above, one US producer cooperated with the investigation and provided all necessary information.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 10 zgoraj, je en proizvajalec iz ZDA sodeloval pri preiskavi in predložil vse potrebne informacije.
Another US producer also provided some incomplete information which in general confirmed the information submitted by the cooperating US producer.
Drug proizvajalec iz ZDA je predložil nekaj nepopolnih informacij, ki so na splošno potrdile informacije, ki jih je predložil sodelujoči proizvajalec iz ZDA.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, normal value for the exporting producers not granted MET was established on the basis of the verified information received from the producer in the analogue country, in accordance with the methodology set out below.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe je bila normalna vrednost za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim TGO ni bila odobrena, opredeljena na podlagi preverjenih informacij proizvajalca iz primerljive države, in sicer v skladu s spodaj opredeljeno metodologijo.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first established for the producer in the analogue country whether its total domestic sales of the product in question were representative during the IP, i.e. whether the total volume of such sales represented at least 5 % of Chinese export sales of the product concerned to the Community.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe najprej za vsakega proizvajalca v primerljivi državi preverila, ali je njegova domača prodaja zadevnega izdelka reprezentativna v OP, to je ali celotni obseg te prodaje predstavlja vsaj 5 % kitajskega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost.
Next, for each type of the product in question sold by the US producer on its domestic market and found to be directly comparable with the type of product concerned sold for export to the Community, it was established whether domestic sales were sufficiently representative for the purposes of Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega se je za vsako vrsto zadevnega izdelka, ki jo je proizvajalec iz ZDA prodal na notranjem trgu in za katero je bilo ugotovljeno, da je neposredno primerljiva z vrsto zadevnega izdelka, ki je bila prodana za izvoz v Skupnost, ugotavljalo, ali je domača prodaja dovolj reprezentativna za namene člena 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
Domestic sales of a particular product type were considered sufficiently representative when the volume of that product type sold on the domestic market to independent customers during the IP represented at least 5 % of the total volume of the comparable product type sold by Chinese producers for export to the Community.
Domača prodaja neke vrste izdelka se je štela za dovolj reprezentativno, če je obseg prodaje te vrste izdelka neodvisnim strankam na notranjem trgu med IO predstavljal najmanj 5 % celotnega obsega prodaje primerljive vrste izdelka, ki so jo kitajski proizvajalci prodali za izvoz v Skupnost.
The Commission subsequently examined whether each type of the product concerned sold domestically in representative quantities could be considered as being sold in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je naknadno preverila, ali se lahko za vsako vrsto zadevnega izdelka, ki je bila prodana na notranjem trgu v reprezentativnih količinah, šteje, da je bila prodana v običajnem poteku trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
This was done by establishing for each product type the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market during the IP.
Pri tem je bil za vsako vrsto izdelka opredeljen delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam na notranjem trgu v OP.
Where the sales volume of a product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of that type, and where the weighted average price of that type was equal to or above the cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price.
Kadar je obseg prodaje vrste izdelka, prodane po neto prodajni ceni, ki je bila enaka ali višja kot izračunani stroški proizvodnje, predstavljal več kot 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje navedene vrste in kadar je bila tehtana povprečna cena navedene vrste enaka ali višja kot stroški proizvodnje, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni.
Where the volume of profitable sales of a product type represented 80 % or less of the total sales volume of that type, or where the weighted average price of that type was below the cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price, calculated as a weighted average of profitable sales of that type only.
Kadar je obseg dobičkonosne prodaje neke vrste izdelka predstavljal 80 % ali manj celotnega obsega prodaje navedene vrste ali kadar je bila tehtana povprečna cena navedene vrste nižja od stroškov proizvodnje, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtano povprečje dobičkonosnih prodaj le navedene vrste.