natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of sulphanilic acid originating in India following an expiry review pursuant to Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 and a partial interim review pursuant to Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 and amending Regulation (EC) No 1000/2008 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of sulphanilic acid originating in the People’s Republic of China and India following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96
o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve pri uvozu sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Indije po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 18 Uredbe (ES) št. 2026/97 in delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 19 Uredbe (ES) št. 2026/97 ter o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1000/2008 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve pri uvozu sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Indije po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Articles 15, 18 and 19 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2026/97 z dne 6. oktobra 1997 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), ter zlasti členov 15, 18 in 19 Uredbe,
In July 2002, by Regulation (EC) No 1338/2002 [2], the Council imposed a definitive countervailing duty (the existing measures) of 7,1 % on imports of sulphanilic acid falling within CN code ex29214210 (TARIC code 2921421060) originating in India.
Svet je julija 2002 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1338/2002 [2] uvedel dokončno izravnalno dajatev („obstoječi ukrepi“) pri 7,1 % uvoza sulfanilne kisline, ki spada pod oznako KN ex29214210 (oznaka TARIC 2921421060) s poreklom iz Indije.
The measures imposed had been based on the findings of an antisubsidy proceeding initiated pursuant to Article 10 of the basic Regulation (the original investigation).
Uvedeni ukrepi temeljijo na ugotovitvah glede protisubvencijskega postopka v skladu s členom 10 osnovne uredbe („prvotna preiskava“).
At the same time, by Regulation (EC) No 1339/2002 [3], the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of 18,3 % on imports of the same product originating in India.
Hkrati je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1339/2002 [3] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev v višini 18,3 % na uvoz navedenega izdelka s poreklom iz Indije.
Within the framework of the above-mentioned countervailing and anti-dumping proceedings, the Commission, by Decision 2002/611/EC [4] accepted a price undertaking offered by the Indian exporting producer, Kokan Synthetics and Chemicals Pvt.
Komisija je v okviru zgoraj omenjenih izravnalnih in protidampinških postopkov s Sklepom 2002/611/ES [4] sprejela cenovno zvezo, ki jo je ponudil indijski izvozni proizvajalec Kokan Synthetics and Chemicals Pvt.
Accordingly, the Commission Decision accepting the undertaking was repealed by Decision 2004/255/EC [5].
V skladu s tem je bil Sklep Komisije o sprejetju zaveze razveljavljen s Sklepom Komisije 2004/255/ES [5].
In April 2005, following a request lodged by Kokan, the Commission initiated [6] a partial interim review pursuant to Article 19 of the basic Regulation and Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 [7] (the basic anti-dumping Regulation) respectively, limited in scope to the examination of the acceptability of an undertaking to be offered by the company.
Komisija je aprila 2005 po zahtevi, ki jo je vložilo podjetje Kokan, začela [6] delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe in členom 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 [7] („osnovna protidampinška uredba“), omejena pa je bila na področje proučitve sprejemljivosti zaveze, ki jo je ponudila družba.
Following an investigation, in December 2005, by Decision 2006/37/EC [8], the Commission accepted an undertaking offered by Kokan in connection with the anti-dumping and countervailing proceedings concerning imports of sulphanilic acid originating in India.
Komisija je po preiskavi decembra 2005 s sklepom 2006/37/ES [8] sprejela zavezo, ki jo je ponudilo podjetje Kokan v zvezi s protidampinškimi in izravnalnimi postopki, ki so povezani z uvozom sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Indije.
In January 2006, as a result of the investigation referred to above in recital 6, by Council Regulation (EC) No 123/2006 [9], Regulation (EC) No 1338/2002 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of sulphanilic acid originating in India and Regulation (EC) No 1339/2002 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of sulphanilic acid originating, inter alia, in India, were amended to take into account the acceptance of the said undertaking.
Januarja 2006 so bile kot posledica preiskave iz uvodne izjave 6 z namenom upoštevanja omenjene zaveze spremenjene Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 123/2006 [9], Uredba (ES) št. 1338/2002 o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve na uvoz sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Indije ter Uredba (ES) št. 1339/2002 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz sulfanilne kisline s poreklom med drugim iz Indije.
Following a review in accordance with the provisions of Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1000/2008 [10], imposed an anti-dumping duty on imports of sulphanilic acid originating in the People’s Republic of China and India.
Svet je po reviziji v skladu z določbami člena 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1000/2008 [10], uvedel protidampinške dajatve pri uvozu sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Indije.
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry [11] of the existing measures, the Commission, on 24 April 2007, received a request for an expiry review pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku [11] obstoječih ukrepov 24. aprila 2007 prejela zahtevek za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
The request for an expiry review was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in the continuation or recurrence of subsidisation and injury to the Community industry.
Zahtevek za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov je bil utemeljen s tem, da bi se zaradi izteka teh ukrepov subvencioniranje in škoda za industrijo Skupnosti verjetno nadaljevala ali ponovila.
The Commission examined the evidence submitted by the applicants and considered it sufficient to justify the initiation of a review in accordance with the provisions of Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je proučila dokaze, ki sta jih predložila vlagatelja, in ugotovila, da zadoščajo za utemeljitev začetka pregleda v skladu z določbami člena 18 osnovne uredbe.
After consultation of the Advisory Committee, the Commission announced on 24 July 2007, by a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [12], the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom 24. julija 2007 s sporočilom o začetku, ki je bil objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [12], najavila začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
It should be noted that prior to the initiation of the expiry review, and in accordance with Articles 10(9) and 22(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission notified the Government of India (hereinafter referred to as GOI) that it had received a properly documented review request and invited the GOI for consultations with the aim of clarifying the situation as regards the contents of the complaint and arriving at a mutually agreed solution.
Treba je poudariti, da je Komisija pred začetkom pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa in v skladu s členoma 10(9) in 22(1) osnovne uredbe uradno obvestila vlado Indije, da je prejela ustrezno dokumentiran zahtevek za pregled, ter jo povabila k posvetovanjem, da bi pojasnili položaj glede vsebine pritožbe in da bi dosegli vzajemno dogovorjeno rešitev.
The GOI did not react to this offer of consultations.
Vlada Indije se ni odzvala na povabilo k posvetovanjem.
Consultations were likewise offered and held with the Indian authorities in the context of the partial interim review referred to below.
Na posvetovanja glede spodaj omenjenega delnega vmesnega pregleda so bili na enak način povabljeni indijski organi, ki so se odzvali.
These consultations did not arrive at a mutually agreed solution that would have warranted that the review not be initiated.
Posvetovanja niso pripeljala do skupne rešitve, s katero bi se pregled štel za neupravičenega.
Partial interim review
Delni vmesni pregled
By a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 29 September 2007 [13] (the Article 19 notice of initiation), the Commission, pursuant to Article 19 of the basic Regulation, initiated on its own initiative a partial interim review limited to the level of subsidisation, since there was sufficient prima facie evidence available to the Commission that the circumstances with regard to subsidisation on the basis of which measures had been established have changed and that these changes were of a lasting nature.
Komisija je z obvestilom o začetku, ki je bilo objavljeno v Uradnem listu Evropske unije29. septembra 2007 [13] („obvestilo o začetku v skladu s členom 19“), v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe na lastno pobudo začela delni vmesni pregled, saj je Komisija imela na voljo zadostne prima facie dokaze, da so se okoliščine glede subvencioniranja, na podlagi katerih so bili določeni ukrepi, spremenile in da so te spremembe trajne.
The review was limited to the level of subsidisation of the company Kokan listed in the Annex to the Article 19 notice of initiation as well as to other exporters that were invited to make themselves known under the conditions and within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation.
Pregled se je omejil na raven subvencioniranja podjetja Kokan, ki je bilo navedeno v Prilogi k členu 19 obvestila o začetku, prav tako pa tudi na druge izvoznike, ki so bili vabljeni, da se javijo v okviru pogojev in časovnega roka, ki so bili navedeni v obvestilu o začetku.
The investigation of continuation or recurrence of subsidisation covered the period from 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2007 (review investigation period or RIP).
Preiskava glede nadaljevanja ali ponovnega pojava subvencioniranja in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. aprila 2006 do 31. marca 2007 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
This period was also used for the examination of the alleged changed circumstances that led to the initiation of the partial interim review.
V tem obdobju se je hkrati izvedla preiskava domnevnih spremenjenih okoliščin, zaradi katerih se je začel delni vmesni pregled.
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of a likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 2003 to the end of the review investigation period (the period considered).
Proučevanje trendov, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovnega pojava škode, je zajemalo obdobje od leta 2003 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („zadevno obdobje“).
The Commission officially advised the exporting producers, importers and users known to be concerned and their associations, the representatives of the exporting country, the applicant and the Community producers of the initiation of the expiry review and the partial interim review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa in delnega vmesnega pregleda uradno obvestila proizvajalce izvoznike, uvoznike in uporabnike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter njihova združenja, predstavnike držav izvoznic, vlagatelja in proizvajalce Skupnosti.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresiranim stranem je bila dana možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo Komisijo za zaslišanje v roku, ki je naveden v obvestilu o začetku.
Questionnaires were sent in the expiry review to all parties known to be concerned, namely to the two Community producers, to the exporting producer in India and to the known importers and users and to the GOI.
Vsem znanim zadevnim strankam so bili pri pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa poslani vprašalniki, tj. dvema proizvajalcema Skupnosti, proizvajalcu izvozniku v Indiji in znanim uvoznikom ter uporabnikom in vladi Indije.
In regard to the partial interim review, questionnaires were sent to the exporting producer in India and to the GOI.
Ob upoštevanju delnega vmesnega pregleda so bili vprašalniki poslani izvoznemu proizvajalcu v Indiji in vladi Indije.
Replies to the questionnaires were received from the GOI, both of the Community producers and the exporting producer from the country concerned, as well as from four users.
Vlada Indije je vrnila izpolnjen vprašalnik, prav tako pa tudi oba proizvajalca Skupnosti, proizvajalec izvoznik iz zadevne države in štirje uporabniki.
None of the importers replied to the questionnaire and no other importers supplied the Commission with any information or made themselves known in the course of the investigations.
Vendar pa vprašalnika ni izpolnil nihče izmed uvoznikov, prav tako pa Komisiji niso predložili kakršnih koli informacij ali se oglasili v času preiskave.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for a determination of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of subsidisation and resulting injury and of the Community interest as well as of alleged changed level of subsidisation.
Komisija je poiskala in preverila informacije, ki jih je štela za potrebne pri ugotavljanju možnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovnega pojava subvencioniranja in nastale škode ter interesov Skupnosti, prav tako pa tudi domnevno spremenjene ravni subvencioniranja.
In this regard the Commission carried out verification visits at the premises of the GOI in Delhi, the Government of Maharashtra in Mumbai, the Reserve Bank of India in Mumbai, and the following companies:
Zato je Komisija opravila preveritvene obiske v prostorih vlade Indije v Delhiju, vlade Maharaštre v Bombaju, Indijske centralne banke v Bombaju in v naslednjih podjetjih:
Exporting producer in India:
proizvajalec izvoznik iz Indije:
Kokan Synthetics & Chemicals Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India;
Kokan Synthetics & Chemicals Pvt Ltd., Bombaj, Indija;
Ardenity, Givet, France,
Ardenity, Givet, Francija,
Kemira Germany GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany,
Kemira Germany GmbH, Leverkusen, Nemčija,
The product under review is sulphanilic acid originating in India (the product concerned), currently classifiable within CN code ex29214210 (TARIC 2921421060).
Izdelek, ki se pregleduje, je sulfanilna kislina s poreklom iz Indije („zadevni izdelek“), ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznako KN ex29214210 (oznaka TARIC 2921421060).
In addition, the purified grade is sometimes commercialised in the form of a salt of sulphanilic acid.
Kislina očiščene kakovosti je včasih na trgu prisotna v obliki soli sulfanilne kisline.
While there are different uses of sulphanilic acid, all grades and forms are perceived by users to be reasonably substitutable, are used interchangeably in most applications and are therefore, treated, as was the case in the original investigation, as one single product.
Ker obstajajo različne rabe sulfanilne kisline in lahko uporabniki vse stopnje in oblike nadomestijo ter enakovredno uporabljajo, se jih torej kot pri prvotni preiskavi šteje za zgolj en izdelek.
As established in the original investigation, these review investigations confirmed that sulphanilic acid and its salts are pure commodity products, and their quality and basic physical characteristics are identical whatever the country of origin.
Kot je pokazala prvotna preiskava, so te preiskave v zvezi s pregledom potrdile, da so sulfanilna kislina in njene soli čist izdelek, njihova kakovost in osnovne fizikalne lastnosti pa so enake ne glede na državo porekla.
The product concerned and the products manufactured and sold by the exporting producer concerned on its domestic market and exported to third countries, as well as those manufactured and sold by the Community producers on the Community market have thus been found to have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and essentially the same uses and are therefore considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(5) of the basic Regulation.
Zadevni izdelek in izdelki, ki jih proizvede in proda zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik na svojem domačem trgu ter izvozi v tretje države, prav tako pa tudi izdelki, ki jih proizvedejo in prodajo proizvajalci Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti, imajo enake osnovne fizikalne in kemične lastnosti ter v osnovi enako uporabo ter se jih zato šteje za podobne izdelke v smislu člena 1(5) osnovne uredbe.
On the basis of the information contained in the review request and the replies to the Commission’s questionnaire, the following schemes, which allegedly involve the granting of subsidies, were investigated:
Na podlagi informacij iz zahtevka za pregled in odgovorov na vprašalnik Komisije so bile preiskane naslednje sheme, ki domnevno vključujejo dodeljevanje subvencij:
Subsidy schemes investigated in original investigation:
Sheme subvencioniranja, ki so bile preiskane v prvotni preiskavi
Nationwide schemes:
Državne sheme
Export Processing Zones Scheme (EPZS)/Special Economic Zones Scheme (SEZS)/Export Oriented Units Scheme (EOUS);
Shema proste carinske cone („SPCC“)/Shema posebnih ekonomskih con („SPEC“)/Shema izvozno usmerjenih enot („SIUE“)
Duty Entitlement Passbook Scheme (DEPBS);
Shema za preložitev plačila uvoznih dajatev („DEPB“)
Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme (EPCGS);
Shema spodbujanja izvoza investicijskega blaga („SSIIB“)
Income Tax Exemption Scheme (ITES);
Shema oprostitve davka na dohodek od izvoza („ITES“)
Advance Licence Scheme (ALS)/Advance Authorisation Scheme (AAS),
Shema vnaprejšnjih dovoljenj („ALS“)/Shema za vnaprejšnjo pripustitev naročil („ARO“)
Regional schemes:
Regionalne sheme
Package Scheme of Incentives (PSI) of the Government of Maharashtra,
Paketna shema spodbud („PSI“) vlade Maharaštre
Subsidy schemes not investigated in original investigation:
Sheme subvencioniranja, ki so bile preiskane v prvotni preiskavi
Export Credit Scheme (pre-shipment and post-shipment) (ECS).
Shema izvoznih kreditov (pred odpremo in po odpremi) („SIK“)
The schemes (a), (b), (c) and (e) specified above are based on the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act 1992 (No 22 of 1992) which entered into force on 7 August 1992 (Foreign Trade Act).
Zgoraj navedene sheme (a), (b), (c) in (e) temeljijo na Zakonu o zunanjetrgovinskem poslovanju (razvoj in predpisi) iz leta 1992 (št. 22 iz leta 1992), ki je začel veljati 7. avgusta 1992 („Zakon o zunanjetrgovinskem poslovanju“).
The Foreign Trade Act authorises the GOI to issue notifications regarding the export and import policy.
Zakon o zunanjetrgovinskem poslovanju pooblašča vlado Indije, da izdaja uradna obvestila glede izvozne in uvozne politike.
These are summarised in ‘Export and Import Policy’ documents, which, since 1 September 2004, has been named ‘Foreign Trade Policy’, and are issued by the Ministry of Commerce every five years and updated regularly.
Ta so povzeta v dokumentih „Izvozna in uvozna politika“, ki se od 1. septembra 2004 imenujejo „Zunanjetrgovinska politika“ in jih vsakih pet let izda Ministrstvo za trgovino ter jih redno posodablja.
One Export and Import Policy document is relevant to the review investigation period of this case, i.e. the five-year plan relating to the period 1 September 2004 to 31 March 2009 (EXIM-policy 2004-2009).
Za obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom tega primera je pomemben en dokument Izvozne in uvozne politike, tj. petletni načrt za obdobje od 1. septembra 2004 do 31. marca 2009 („politika EXIM 2004–2009“).
In addition, the GOI also sets out the procedures governing the EXIM-policy 2004-2009 in a ‘Handbook of Procedures — 1 September 2004 to 31 March 2009, Volume I’ (HOP I 2004-2009).
Poleg tega vlada Indije določi postopke, ki urejajo politiko EXIM 2004–2009, v „Priročniku postopkov – od 1. septembra 2004 do 31. marca 2009, Zvezek I“ („HOP I 2004–2009“).
The Income Tax Exemption Scheme specified above under (d) is based on the Income Tax Act of 1961, which is amended yearly by the Finance Act.
Sheme oprostitve davka na dohodek, navedene zgoraj pod točko (d), temeljijo na Zakonu o davku na dohodek iz leta 1961, ki ga letno spreminja Zakon o financah.
The scheme (f) is managed by the State of Maharashtra and is based on resolutions of the Government of Maharashtra Industries, Energy and Labour Department.
S shemo (f) upravlja država Maharaštra in temelji na resolucijah Ministrstva vlade Maharaštre za industrijo, energijo in delo.
The Export Credit Scheme specified above under (g) is based on Sections 21 and 35A of the Banking Regulation Act 1949, which allows the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to direct commercial banks in the field of export credits.
Shema izvoznih kreditov, navedena zgoraj pod točko (g), temelji na oddelkih 21 in 35A Zakona o bančništvu iz leta 1949, ki Indijski centralni banki („ICB“) dovoljuje usmerjanje komercialnih bank na področju izvoznih kreditov.
Export Processing Zones Scheme (EPZS)/Special Economic Zones Scheme (SEZS)/Export Oriented Units Scheme (EOUS)
Shema proste carinske cone („SPCC“)/Shema posebnih ekonomskih con („SPEC“)/Shema izvozno usmerjenih enot („SIUE“)
It was found that the cooperating exporting producer was not located in an SEZS nor in an EPZS.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da se sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik ni nahajal v SPEC niti v SPCC.
However, the cooperating exporting producer had been set up under the EOUS and received countervailable subsidies in the RIP.
Kljub temu se je sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik vključil v SIUE in je prejel izravnalne subvencije v OPP.
The description and assessment below is therefore limited to the EOUS.
Opis in presoja spodaj je torej omejena na SIUE.
The details of the EOUS are contained in chapter 6 of the EXIM-policy 2004-2009 and the HOP I 2004-2009.
Natančni podatki o SIUE se nahajajo v poglavju 6 politike EXIM 2004–2009 in v HOP I 2004–2009.
With the exception of pure trading companies, all enterprises which, in principle, undertake to export their entire production of goods or services may be set up under the EOUS.
Z izjemo izključno trgovskih družb so lahko v SIUE ali SPEC vključene vse družbe, ki izvažajo svojo celotno proizvodnjo blaga in storitev.
Undertakings in industrial sectors have to fulfil a minimum investment threshold in fixed assets (INR 10 million) to be eligible for the EOUS.
Podjetja v industrijskem sektorju morajo izpolnjevati minimalen investicijski prag fiksnih sredstev (10 milijonov indijskih rupij), da so lahko upravičena do SIUE.
EOUS can be located and established anywhere in India.
SIUE se lahko nahaja in ustanovi kjer koli v Indiji.
An application for EOUS status must include details for the next five years of, inter alia, planned production quantities, projected value of exports, import requirements and indigenous requirements.
Vloga za status SIUE mora vsebovati podatke za prihodnjih pet let o med drugim načrtovanih proizvodnih količinah, pričakovani vrednosti izvoza, uvoznih zahtevah in domačih potrebah.
Upon acceptance by the authorities of the company’s application, the terms and conditions attached to this acceptance will be communicated to the company.
Če organi sprejmejo vlogo podjetja, se pogoji za sprejem posredujejo podjetju.
The agreement to be recognised as a company under the EOUS is valid for a five-year period.
Sporazum o priznanju statusa SIUE podjetja velja pet let.
A crucial obligation of an EOUS as set out in the EXIM-policy 2004-2009 is to achieve net foreign exchange (NFE) earnings, i.e. in a reference period (five years) the total value of exports has to be higher than the total value of imported goods.
Ključna obveznost SIUE, kot je določeno v politiki EXIM 2004–2009, je doseči neto devizni zaslužek („NDZ“), kar pomeni, da mora biti v referenčnem obdobju (pet let) skupna vrednost izvoza višja od skupne vrednosti uvoza blaga.