natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In view of the factors examined in recitals 8 to 13, the condition of direct exposure to competition laid down in Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC should be considered to be met in respect of production and wholesale supply of electricity in the Macro-zone North.
Glede na preučene dejavnike iz uvodnih izjav od (8) do (13) se šteje, da je pogoj neposredne izpostavljenosti konkurenci, določen v členu 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES, izpolnjen glede proizvodnje in veleprodaje električne energije na severnem makro območju.
Furthermore, since the condition of unrestricted access to the market is deemed to be met, Directive 2004/17/EC should not apply when contracting entities award contracts intended to enable electricity production and wholesale supply to be carried out in Macro-zone North nor when they organise design contests for the pursuit of such an activity in that geographical area.
Ker se poleg tega zdi, da je pogoj glede neomejenega dostopa do trga izpolnjen, se Direktiva 2004/17/ES ne uporablja, če naročniki oddajo naročila, katerih namen je omogočanje proizvodnje električne energije in veleprodaje na severnem makro območju, ali če se na tem geografskem območju v ta namen organizirajo natečaji.
In respect of retail sale of electricity to end customers connected to the medium, high and very high voltage grid, in Italy, the situation can thus be summarised as follows: the aggregate market shares of the three biggest retail companies is low, and the degree of switching by withdrawal point is satisfactory and there is no end-user price control.
Glede na maloprodajo električne energije končnim odjemalcem, povezanim s srednjo, visoko in zelo visokonapetostno mrežo v Italiji, se lahko situacija povzame tako: vsota tržnih deležev treh največjih podjetji maloprodaje je nizka in stopnja menjave z umikanjem je zadovoljiva ter končni uporabniki ne nadzirajo cene.
These conclusions are also in line with the opinion of the relevant Italian Authorities whereby this market has been exposed to competition for several years and the resulting degree of competition is satisfactory.
Ti sklepi so tudi v skladu z mnenjem pristojnih italijanskih organov, pri čemer je bil ta trg več let izpostavljen konkurenci in je posledična stopnja konkurence zadovoljiva.
In view of the factors examined in recitals 15 to 18, the condition of direct exposure to competition laid down in Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC should be considered to be met in respect of retail supply of electricity to end customers connected to the medium, high and very high voltage grid on the entire territory of the Italian Republic.
Glede na dejavnike, preučene v uvodnih izjavah od (15) do (18), se šteje, da je pogoj neposredne izpostavljenosti konkurenci, določen v členu 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES, glede maloprodaje električne energije končnim odjemalcem, povezanim s srednjenapetostno, visokonapetostno in zelo visokonapetostno mrežo, na celotnem ozemlju Italijanske republike, izpolnjen.
Furthermore, since the condition of unrestricted access to the market is deemed to be met, Directive 2004/17/EC should not apply when contracting entities award contracts intended to enable retail supply of electricity to end customers connected to the medium, high and very high voltage grid in Italy nor when they organise design contests for the pursuit of such an activity in that geographical area.
Ker se poleg tega zdi, da je pogoj glede neomejenega dostopa do trga izpolnjen, se Direktiva 2004/17/ES ne uporablja, če naročniki oddajo naročila, katerih namen je omogočanje maloprodaje električne energije končnim odjemalcem, povezanim s srednjo, visoko in zelo visokonapetostno mrežo v Italiji, ali če se na tem geografskem območju v ta namen organizirajo natečaji.
In view of the factors examined in recitals 19 to 25 and given the doubts about the existence of sufficient competition at the national level in respect of retail supply to end customers connected to the low voltage grid and moreover in the absence of detailed information on each and every relevant local market, as defined by the Italian authorities, it is not possible to conclude that the conditions for granting an exemption under Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC for the retail supply of electricity to end customers connected to low voltage grid in Italy, are met.
Glede na dejavnike, preučene v uvodnih izjavah od (19) do (25), in glede na dvome o obstoju zadostne konkurence na nacionalni ravni v zvezi z maloprodajo končnim odjemalcem, povezanim z nizkonapetostno mrežo, in poleg tega v odsotnosti podrobnih informacij o vsakem upoštevnem lokalnem trgu, kot so določili italijanski organi, ni mogoče sklepati, da so pogoji za odobritev izjeme po členu 30(1) Direktive za maloprodajo električne energije končnim odjemalcem, povezanim z nizkonapetostno mrežo v Italiji, izpolnjeni.
Consequently, Directive 2004/17/EC continues to apply when contracting entities award contracts intended to enable the retail supply of electricity to end customers connected to low voltage grid, to be carried out in Italy and when they organise design contests for the pursuit of such an activity in Italy.
Zato se Direktiva 2004/17/ES še naprej uporablja v primerih, kadar naročniki oddajo naročila za omogočanje izvajanje maloprodaje električne energije končnim uporabnikom, povezanim z nizkonapetostno mrežo, v Italiji in kadar organizirajo natečaje za izvajanje takšne dejavnosti v Italiji.
As the statistical obligations pursuant to Article 67 will continue to apply, it may be necessary to ensure that the contracting entities concerned take appropriate measures such as managerial and/or accounting separation so as to be able to report correctly on procurement made for the pursuit of the relevant activities which have not been exempted pursuant to the present Decision.
Ker statistične obveznosti v skladu s členom 67 še vedno veljajo, je treba zagotoviti, da zadevni naročniki sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe, kot na primer upravljalno in/ali računovodsko ločevanje, da lahko pravilno poročajo o ukrepih z namenom izvajanja ustreznih dejavnosti, ki niso bile izvzete v skladu s tem sklepom.
Also, it is recalled that contracts covering several activities shall be treated in accordance with Article 9 of Directive 2004/17/EC.
Poleg tega je treba spomniti, da se morajo pogodbe, ki pokrivajo več dejavnosti, obravnavati v skladu s členom 9 Direktive 2004/17/ES.
In the present context this means that when a contracting entity is engaged in ‘mixed’ procurement, that is procurement used to support the performance of both activities exempted from the application of Directive 2004/17/EC and activities not exempted, regard shall be had to the activities for which the contract is principally intended.
V trenutnem kontekstu to pomeni, da kadar naročnik izvaja „mešano“ naročilo, se to naročilo uporabi za podporo učinkovitosti dejavnosti, izvzetih iz uporabe Direktive 2004/17/ES, in dejavnosti, ki niso izvzete, upoštevati je treba dejavnosti, za katere je bila pogodba prvotno namenjena.
In the event of such mixed procurement, where the purpose is principally to support the retail of electricity to end customers connected to the low voltage grid, the provision of Directive 2004/17/EC shall apply.
V primeru takšnega mešanega naročila, kadar je namen v glavnem podpora maloprodaje električne energije končnim odjemalcem, povezanim z nizkonapetostno mrežo, veljajo določbe Direktive 2004/17/ES.
If it is objectively impossible to determine for which activity the contract is principally intended, the contract shall be awarded in accordance with the rules referred to in paragraphs (2) and (3) of Article 9.
Če je objektivno nemogoče določiti, kateri dejavnosti je pogodba prvotno namenjena, se pogodba dodeli v skladu s predpisi iz pododstavkov (2) in (3) člena 9.
Directive 2004/17/EC shall not apply to contracts awarded by contracting entities and intended to enable the following activities to be carried out:
Direktiva 2004/17/ES se ne uporablja za naročila, ki jih oddajo naročniki in ki so namenjena omogočanju izvajanja naslednjih dejavnosti:
production and wholesale supply of electricity in the Macro-zone North;
proizvodnja in veleprodaja električne energije na severnem makro območju;
retail supply of electricity to end customers connected to the medium, high and very high voltage grid in the entire territory of the Italian Republic.
maloprodaja električne energije končnim odjemalcem, povezanim s srednjenapetostno, visokonapetostno in zelo visokonapetostno mrežo na celotnem ozemlju Italijanske republike.
This includes the Zone Nord as well as four smaller zones (Ene, Enw, Turbigo and Monfalcone), as referred to in Annex B to Commission Communication of 10 January 2007‘Inquiry pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 into the European gas and electricity sectors (Final Report)’ (COM(2006) 851 final, ‘Final Report’).
Sem spada severno območje ter štiri manjša območja (ENE, ENW, Turbigo in Monfalcone), kot je navedeno v Prilogi B k Sporočilu Komisije „Preiskava na podlagi člena 17 Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003 v panogi plina in elektroenergetski panogi“ (Končno poročilo) (COM(2006) 851 konč.).
It is to be noted that Directive 2003/54/EC has been replaced by Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC (OJ L 211, 14.8.2009, p. 55), which requires an even higher degree of market opening than the previous two directives.
Treba je upoštevati, da je Direktivo 2003/54/ES nadomestila Direktiva 2009/72/EC Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. julija 2009 o skupnih pravilih notranjega trga z električno energijo in o razveljavitvi Direktive 2003/54/ES (UL L 211 z dne 14.8.2009, str. 55), ki zahteva še večjo stopnjo odpiranja trga od prejšnjih dveh direktiv.
However, as the deadline for its implementation has not yet expired, reference will continue to be made to the legal framework introduced by Directive 2003/54/EC.
Ker pa rok izvajanja še ni potekel, se pravni okvir Direktive 2003/54/ES še vedno navaja.
MERGER COMP M - 4110 E.ON – Endesa, p. 3.
ZDRUŽITEV COMP M-4110, E.ON – ENDESA, str. 3
See Final Report, Annex B, point A1, 2.
Glej Končno poročilo, Priloga B, točka A1, 2.
This includes the Zones Centro Nord, Piombino, Centro Sud, Sud, Rossano, Brindisi and Calabria.
Sem spadajo območja Centro Nord, Piombino, Centro Sud, Sud, Rossano, Brindisi, in Calabria.
This includes the zones Sicilia, Priolo and Calabria.
Sem spadajo območja Sicilia, Priolo in Calabria.
See Commission Decisions 2009/47/EC (OJ L 19, 23.1.2009, p. 57); 2008/585/EC (OJ L 188, 16.7.2008, p. 28); 2008/741/EC (OJ L 251, 19.9.2008, p. 35); 2007/141/EC (OJ L 62, 1.3.2007, p. 23); 2007/706/EC (OJ L 287, 1.11.2007, p. 18); 2006/211/EC (OJ L 76, 15.3.2006, p. 6) and 2006/422/EC (OJ L 168, 21.6.2006, p. 33).
Glej Odločbe Komisije 2009/47/ES (UL L 19, 23.1.2009, str. 57), 2008/585/ES (UL L 188, 16.7.2008, str. 28), 2008/741/ES (UL L 251, 19.9.2008, str. 35), 2007/141/ES (UL L 62, 1.3.2007, str. 23), 2007/706/ES (UL L 287, 1.11.2007, str. 18), 2006/211/ES (UL L 76, 15.3.2006, str. 6) in 2006/422/ES (UL L 168 21.6.2006, str. 33).
Letter 0018212 of 10 May 2010 of the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas.
Pismo 0018212 z dne 10. maja 2010 Italijanskega organa za električno energijo in plin.
Law No 99/2009 of 23 July 2009.
Zakon št. 99/2009 z dne 23. julija 2009.
SEC(2010) 251, hereinafter ‘2010 Communication’.
SEC(2010) 251 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporočilo 2010).
Table 3.1 of the Technical Annex (p. 12) to 2010 Communication.
Tabela 3.1 tehnične priloge (str. 12) k Sporočilu 2010.
Annual Report on the State of Services and the Regulatory Activities of Italian Authority for electricity and Gas (AEEG) of 31 March 2009 (hereinafter the ‘2009 Annual Report of AEEG’), p. 76.
Letno poročilo o stanju storitev in regulatornih dejavnosti italijanskih organov za električno energijo in plin (AEEG) z dne 31. marca 2009 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Letno poročilo AEEG 2009), str. 76.
It corresponds very closely to the level of concentration, 43 %, found on the Swedish retail market (see recital 14 of Decision 2007/706/EC).
Zelo blizu je stopnji koncentracije 43 %, ki jo lahko najdemo na švedskem trgu maloprodaje, glej uvodno izjavo 14 Odločbe 2007/706/ES.
Commission Communication of 15 November 2005‘Report on progress in creating the internal gas and electricity market’ (COM(2005) 568 final, hereinafter ‘2005 Communication’), p. 9.
COM(2005) 568, Poročilo Komisije o napredku pri oblikovanju notranjega trga s plinom in električno energijo str. 9. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporočilo 2005).
Table 2.2 of Technical Annex to 2010 Communication.
Tabela 2.2 tehnične priloge k Sporočilu 2010.
See recital 13 of Decision 2008/585/EC.
Glej uvodno izjavo 13 Odločbe 2008/585/ES.
2009 Annual Report of AEEG.
Letno poročilo AEEG 2009.
See point 328 of the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 28 February 2002 in Case T-395/94 Atlantic Container Line AB and Others v Commission, [2002] ECR II-875.
Glej točko 328 sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 28. februarja 2002 v Zadevi T-395/94 Atlantic Container Line AB in drugi proti Komisiji, str. II-875.
In fact, the regulated prices are set on the basis of prices that are found on the free market.
V bistvu so regulirane cene določene na osnovi cen, ki se pojavljajo na svobodnem trgu.
Letter 0032953 of 20 May 2010 of the Italian Competition Authority.
Pismo 0032953 z dne 20. maja 2010 Italijanskega organa za konkurenco.
This Decision is based on the legal and factual situation as of February to May 2010 as it appears from the information submitted by the Italian Republic, CVA, the 2005 and 2010 Communications and their Technical annexes and the 2007 Staff Document, the Final Report and the 2009 Annual Report of AEEG.
Ta sklep temelji na pravnem in dejanskem stanju iz obdobja od februarja do maja 2010, kot je razvidno iz informacij Italijanske republike, CVA, Sporočil 2005 in 2010 ter njihovih tehničnih prilog in dokumenta služb iz leta 2007 ter končnega poročila in letnega poročila 2009 AEEG.
It may be revised, should significant changes in the legal or factual situation mean that the conditions for the applicability of Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC for wholesale supply of electricity in the Macro-zone North and retail supply to end customers connected to medium, high and very high voltage grid are no longer met,
Lahko se spremeni, če bi pomembne spremembe pravnega ali dejanskega stanja pomenile, da pogoji za uporabo člena 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES za veleprodajo električne energije v severnem makro območju in maloprodajo končnim uporabnikom, povezanim s srednjo, visoko in zelo visokonapetostno mrežo niso več izpolnjeni –
of 12 July 2010
z dne 12. julija 2010
authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation
o odobritvi okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju prava, ki se uporablja za razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 329(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti člena 329(1) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the requests made by the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Latvia, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, Malta, the Republic of Austria, the Portuguese Republic, Romania and the Republic of Slovenia,
ob upoštevanju prošenj Kraljevine Belgije, Republike Bolgarije, Zvezne republike Nemčije, Kraljevine Španije, Francoske republike, Italijanske republike, Republike Latvije, Velikega vojvodstva Luksemburg, Republike Madžarske, Malte, Republike Avstrije, Portugalske republike, Romunije in Republike Slovenije,
The Union has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice in which the free movement of persons is ensured.
Unija si je zastavila cilj ohranjati in razvijati območje svobode, varnosti in pravice, na katerem je zagotovljeno prosto gibanje oseb.
For the progressive establishment of such an area, the Union is to adopt measures relating to judicial cooperation in civil matters with cross-border implications, particularly when necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market.
Za postopno vzpostavitev takega območja bi morala Unija sprejeti ukrepe v zvezi s pravosodnim sodelovanjem v civilnih zadevah s čezmejnimi posledicami, zlasti kadar so ti potrebni za pravilno delovanje notranjega trga.
Pursuant to Article 81 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, those measures are to include promoting the compatibility of the rules applicable in the Member States concerning conflict of laws, including measures concerning family law with cross-border implications.
V skladu s členom 81 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije bi morali ti ukrepi zajemati spodbujanje združljivosti pravil, ki se v državah članicah uporabljajo v primerih kolizije zakonov, vključno z ukrepi na področju družinskega prava s čezmejnimi posledicami.
On 17 July 2006, the Commission adopted a proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 as regards jurisdiction and introducing rules concerning applicable law in matrimonial matters (hereinafter referred to as ‘the proposed Regulation’).
Komisija je 17. julija 2006 sprejela predlog uredbe Sveta o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 2201/2003 glede pristojnosti in o uvedbi pravil v zvezi s pravom, ki se uporablja v zakonskih sporih (v nadaljnjem besedilu: predlog uredbe).
At its meeting on 5 and 6 June 2008 the Council adopted political guidelines which recorded that there was no unanimity to go ahead with the proposed Regulation and insurmountable difficulties existed, making unanimity impossible at the time and in the foreseeable future.
Svet je na zasedanju 5. in 6. junija 2008 sprejel politične smernice, v katerih je bilo ugotovljeno, da ni enotne pripravljenosti za nadaljnja prizadevanja v zvezi s predlogom uredbe in da obstajajo nepremostljive težave, zaradi katerih je bilo tedaj in v bližnji prihodnosti nemogoče doseči soglasje.
It established that the objectives of the proposed Regulation could not be attained within a reasonable period by applying the relevant provisions of the Treaties.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da ciljev predloga uredbe ob uporabi zadevnih določb Pogodb ni mogoče doseči v razumnem času.
In these circumstances, Greece, Spain, Italy, Luxembourg, Hungary, Austria, Romania and Slovenia addressed a request to the Commission by letters dated 28 July 2008 indicating that they intended to establish enhanced cooperation between themselves in the area of applicable law in matrimonial matters and that the Commission should submit a proposal to the Council to that end.
V takih okoliščinah so Grčija, Španija, Italija, Luksemburg, Madžarska, Avstrija, Romunija in Slovenija 28. julija 2008 na Komisijo naslovili prošnje, v katerih so navedli, da hočejo vzpostaviti okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju prava, ki se uporablja v zakonskih sporih, ter jo pozvali, naj v ta namen predloži predlog Svetu.
Bulgaria addressed an identical request to the Commission by letter dated 12 August 2008.
Bolgarija je enako prošnjo na Komisijo naslovila z dopisom dne 12. avgusta 2008.
In total, fourteen Member States have requested enhanced cooperation.
Za okrepljeno sodelovanje je skupno zaprosilo trinajst držav članic.
The enhanced cooperation should provide a clear and comprehensive legal framework in the area of divorce and legal separation in the participating Member States and ensure adequate solutions for citizens in terms of legal certainty, predictability and flexibility and prevent a ‘rush to court’.
Namen okrepljenega sodelovanja je oblikovati jasen in celovit pravni okvir na področju prava, ki se uporablja za razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti v udeleženih državah članicah, zagotoviti ustrezne rešitve za državljane glede pravne varnosti, predvidljivosti in prilagodljivosti ter preprečiti „hitenje na sodišče“.
The conditions laid down in Article 20 of the Treaty on European Union and in Articles 326 and 329 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union are fulfilled.
Izpolnjeni so pogoji iz člena 20 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in členov 326 do 329 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
The area of the enhanced cooperation, namely the law applicable to divorce and legal separation, is identified by Article 81(2)(c) and Article 81(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union as one of the areas covered by the Treaties.
Področje okrepljenega sodelovanja, torej pravo, ki se uporablja za razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti, je opredeljeno s členom 81(2)(c) in (3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije kot eno od področij iz Pogodb.
The requirement of last resort in Article 20(2) of the Treaty on European Union is fulfilled in that the Council established in June 2008 that the objectives of the proposed Regulation cannot be attained within a reasonable period by the Union as a whole.
Zahteva po zadnjem sredstvu iz člena 20(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji je izpolnjena s tem, ko je Svet junija 2008 ugotovil, da Unija kot celota ne more doseči ciljev iz predloga uredbe v razumnem času.
Enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation aims to develop judicial cooperation in civil matters having cross-border implications, based on the principle of mutual recognition of judgments, and to ensure the compatibility of the rules applicable in the Member States concerning conflict of laws.
Namen okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju prava, ki se uporablja za razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti, je razviti pravosodno sodelovanje v civilnih zadevah s čezmejnimi posledicami, ki temelji na načelu vzajemnega priznavanja sodnih odločb, ter zagotoviti združljivost pravil, ki se v državah članicah uporabljajo v primerih kolizije zakonov.
Thus, it furthers the objectives of the Union, protects its interests and reinforces its integration process as required by Article 20(1) of the Treaty on European Union.
Tako uresničuje cilje Unije, ščiti njene interese in krepi njene integracijske procese, kot je določeno v členu 20(1) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
Enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation complies with the Treaties and Union law, and it does not undermine the internal market or economic, social and territorial cohesion.
Okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju prava, ki se uporablja za razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti, je skladno s Pogodbama in pravom Unije ter ne škoduje notranjemu trgu ali ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji.
It does not constitute a barrier to or discrimination in trade between Member States and does not distort competition between them.
Ne pomeni ovire ali diskriminacije v trgovini med državami članicami in ne izkrivlja konkurence med njimi.
Enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation respects the competences, rights and obligations of those Member States that do not participate in it.
Okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju prava, ki se uporablja za razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti, spoštuje pristojnosti, pravice in dolžnosti držav članic, ki v njem ne sodelujejo.
The common conflict-of-law rules in the participating Member States do not affect the rules of the non-participating Member States.
Skupna pravila o koliziji zakonov v udeleženih državah članicah ne vplivajo na pravila neudeleženih držav članic.
The courts of the non-participating Member States continue to apply their existing domestic conflict-of-law rules to determine the law applicable to divorce or legal separation.
Sodišča v neudeleženih državah članicah še naprej uporabljajo svoja nacionalna pravila o koliziji zakonov, da določijo pravo, ki se uporablja za razvezo ali prenehanje življenjske skupnosti.