natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to point 25(d) of the Guidelines, rescue aid must be restricted to the amount needed to keep the firm in business for the period during which the aid was authorised; the amount necessary should be based on the liquidity needs of the company stemming from losses.
V skladu s točko 25(d) smernic mora biti pomoč za reševanje omejena na znesek, ki je potreben za delovanje podjetja v obdobju, za katerega je odobrena pomoč; potrebni znesek mora temeljiti na likvidnostih potrebah podjetja, ki izvirajo iz dolgov.
The Commission observes that, although the amount of aid complies with the formula set out in the Annex to the Guidelines for determining the liquidity needs of the company, it amounts to over EUR 10 million and the Italian authorities have not provided sufficient elements to explain why this amount corresponded to what was specifically required by Ixfin in order to remain afloat.
Komisija ugotavlja, da znaša znesek pomoči, čeprav je v skladu s formulo iz priloge k smernicam za opredelitev likvidnostnih potreb podjetja, več kot 10 milijonov EUR in da italijanski organi niso zagotovili dovolj dokazov za pojasnitev, zakaj ta znesek ustreza znesku, ki ga je izrecno zahtevalo podjetje Ixfin za preprečitev zadolževanja.
Therefore, the Commission considers that it has not been sufficiently proven that the amount of aid received constitutes the minimum necessary to keep the company in business in the rescue period as required by point 25(d) of the Guidelines.
Zato Komisija meni, da ni dovolj dokazov, da je znesek prejete pomoči najmanjši znesek, ki je potreben za delovanje podjetja v obdobju reševanja iz točke 25(d) smernic.
According to point 25(e) of the Guidelines, aid must be granted in accordance with the ‘one time, last time’ principle as stipulated in points 72 et seq. of the Guidelines.
V skladu s točko 25(e) smernic mora biti pomoč dodeljena v skladu z načelom enkratnosti pomoči, kot je določeno v točki 72 smernic in točkah, ki ji sledijo.
The Italian authorities have submitted that the ‘one time, last time’ principle has been complied with, i.e. that the company did not benefit from any rescue or restructuring aid in the last ten years.
Italijanski organi so navedli, da je bilo upoštevano načelo enkratnosti pomoči, tj. da podjetje v zadnjih desetih letih ni dobilo nobene pomoči za reševanje ali prestrukturiranje.
The Commission, therefore, on the basis of the information at its disposal, considers that the criterion in point 25(e) of the Guidelines has been met.
Zato Komisija na podlagi informacij, ki jih ima na voljo, meni, da je bilo izpolnjeno merilo iz točke 25(e) smernic.
Moreover, the last clause of point 25(c) stipulates that ‘in the case of non-notified aid the Member State must communicate, no later than six months after the first implementation of a rescue aid measure, a restructuring plan or a liquidation plan or proof that the loan has been reimbursed in full and/or that the guarantee has been terminated’.
Poleg tega je v zadnjem delu točke 25(c) določeno, da mora pomoči država v primeru nepriglašene članica najpozneje šest mesecev po prvem izvajanju ukrepa pomoči za reševanje predložiti načrt za prestrukturiranje ali likvidacijo ali dokazilo, da je bilo posojilo v celoti povrnjeno, in/ali da je jamstvo prenehalo veljati.
An exception to the six-month rule exists pursuant to point 26 of the Guidelines, if the Member State submits a restructuring plan or a liquidation plan within the six-month period.
V skladu s točko 26 smernic obstaja izjema od šestmesečnega pravila, če država članica v šestih mesecih predloži načrt za prestrukturiranje ali likvidacijo.
Neither restructuring plan nor liquidation plan was submitted to the Commission within the aforementioned period.
Komisija v zadevnem obdobju ni prejela nobenega načrta za prestrukturiranje ali likvidacijo.
Further, the guarantee was called on 3 July 2006 and Ixfin did not reimburse the loan at all.
Poleg tega je bilo jamstvo unovčeno 3. julija 2006 in podjetje Ixfin sploh ni povrnilo posojila.
Therefore, the rescue aid to Ixfin must be considered as incompatible with the common market.
Zato je treba upoštevati, da pomoč za reševanje za podjetje Ixfin ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
Restructuring aid
Pomoč za reševanje
The Commission cannot consider the rescue aid as a restructuring measure.
Komisija pomoči za reševanje ne more obravnavati kot ukrep prestrukturiranja.
First, no restructuring plan was submitted to the Commission.
Komisiji ni bil predložen noben načrt prestrukturiranja.
Second, the rescue aid does not comply with the requirements of points 31 et seq. of the Guidelines, which lay down the conditions of compatibility of restructuring measures with the common market.
Poleg tega pomoč za reševanje ne izpolnjuje zahtev iz točke 31 smernic in točk, ki ji sledijo in določajo pogoje združljivosti ukrepov prestrukturiranja s skupnim trgom.
The Commission does not therefore possess any more elements that would allow it to regard the rescue aid as compatible as a restructuring measure.
Komisija zato nima nobenih dokazov, ki bi ji omogočili, da šteje pomoč za reševanje za združljivo kot ukrep prestrukturiranja.
As regards the presumed granting of restructuring aid, on the basis of the information submitted to the Commission in the course of the formal investigation procedure, any doubts as to whether restructuring aid (see recital 32 of this Decision) was granted to Ixfin were dispelled.
Kar zadeva domnevno odobritev pomoči za prestrukturiranje, so bili na podlagi informacij, ki so bile predložene Komisiji med formalnim postopkom preiskave, odpravljeni vsi dvomi, da je bila podjetju Ixfin dodeljena pomoč za prestrukturiranje (glej uvodno izjavo 32 te odločbe).
Therefore, since the existence of the restructuring aid has not been confirmed, assessing its compatibility with the common market has become irrelevant.
Zato je postalo ocenjevanje združljivosti pomoči s skupnim trgom nepomembno, ker obstoj pomoči za prestrukturiranje ni bil potrjen.
The Commission terminates the formal investigation procedure initiated by the Decision of 11 December 2007 concerning the unlawfully granted rescue aid and a presumed restructuring aid measure.
Komisija končuje formalni postopek preiskave, ki ga je sprožila z odločitvijo z dne 11. decembra 2007 o nezakonito dodeljeni pomoči za reševanje in domnevnem ukrepu pomoči za prestrukturiranje.
The Commission concludes that the State aid in the form of a guarantee on a loan amounting to EUR 15 million unlawfully granted by Italy to Ixfin SpA, in breach of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty, is incompatible with the common market.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je državna pomoč v obliki jamstva za posojilo v znesku 15 milijonov EUR, ki jo je Italija v nasprotju s členom 88(3) Pogodbe ES dodelila podjetju Ixfin s.p.a., nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
Italy must recover the incompatible aid from the company.
Italija mora nezdružljivo pomoč od podjetja izterjati.
In the light of the severe financial difficulties of Ixfin at the time the guarantee was granted, the Commission considers that it was highly unlikely that the company would have been able to obtain a bank loan on the market without the state intervention; therefore, the Commission concludes that the amount of aid corresponds to the totality of the amount of the loan.
Komisija glede na resne finančne težave podjetja Ixfin ob dodelitvi jamstva meni, da je obstajalo zelo malo možnosti, da bi lahko podjetje pridobilo bančno posojilo na trgu brez posredovanja države; zato Komisija ugotavlja, da znesek pomoči ustreza skupnemu znesku posojila.
The formal investigation regarding the presumed restructuring aid is closed since, during the course thereof, the granting of restructuring aid to Ixfin was not confirmed,
Formalni postopek preiskave v zvezi z domnevno pomočjo za prestrukturiranje je končan, ker med zadevnim postopkom ni bila potrjena dodelitev pomoči za prestrukturiranje podjetju Ixfin –
The State aid in the form of a guarantee, unlawfully granted by Italy in breach of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty, to cover the loan granted by BancApulia on 30 December 2005 to Ixfin, is a State aid measure and is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč v obliki jamstva, ki jo je Italija v nasprotju s členom 88(3) Pogodbe ES nezakonito dodelila za pokritje posojila, ki ga je banka BancApulia 30. decembra 2005 odobrila podjetju Ixfin, je ukrep državne pomoči in je nezdružljiv s skupnim trgom.
Italy shall recover the aid referred to in Article 1 from the beneficiary.
Upravičenec povrne Italiji pomoč iz člena 1.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiary until their actual recovery.
Zneskom, ki jih je treba vrniti, se prištejejo obresti od datuma, ko so bili dani na voljo upravičencu, do datuma njihovega dejanskega vračila.
This interest should be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [13].
Te obresti je treba izračunati z obrestnoobrestnim računom v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 [13].
Italy shall cancel all outstanding payments of the aid referred to in Article 1 with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Italija prekliče vsa neporavnana plačila pomoči iz člena 1 z začetkom od datuma sprejetja te odločbe.
Italy shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of its notification.
Italija zagotovi, da se ta odločba izvede v štirih mesecih od datuma njene priglasitve.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Italy shall submit the following information to the Commission:
V dveh mesecih od priglasitve te odločbe predloži Italija Komisiji naslednje informacije:
the total amount (principal and interest) to be recovered from the beneficiary;
skupni znesek (glavnica in obresti), ki ga mora vrniti upravičenec;
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision;
natančen opis že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepov za uskladitev s to odločbo;
Italy shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 has been completed.
Italija obvešča Komisijo o napredku glede sprejetih nacionalnih ukrepov za izvajanje te odločbe, dokler se vračanje pomoči iz člena 1 ne konča.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Italija takoj predloži vse informacije o že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepih za uskladitev s to odločbo, ki jih zahteva Komisija.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and interest already recovered from the beneficiary.
Zagotovi tudi podrobne informacije o zneskih pomoči in obrestih, ki jih je upravičenec že povrnil.
This Decision is addressed to Italian Republic.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Italijansko republiko.
OJ C 30, 2.2.2008, p. 21.
UL C 30, 2.2.2008, str. 21.
August 2005.
Avgust 2005.
No information available.
Podatki niso na voljo.
Italian OJ 62 of 16.3.2005.
UL Italijanske republike št. 62, 16.3.2005.
Italian OJ 111 of 14.5.2005.
UL Italijanske republike št. 111, 14.5.2005.
The Commission understands from the Italian legislation that ‘procedura fallimentare’ is a court-administered bankruptcy procedure, which is initiated when a company is deemed to be insolvent.
Komisija razume, da je „procedura fallimentare“ v italijanski zakonodaji stečajni postopek, ki ga vodi sodišče in ki se začne, kadar se oceni, da je podjetje plačilno nesposobno.
A bankruptcy judge oversees the proceedings, whereas the ‘curatore’ (administrator) deals with the allocation of the debtor’s assets, and a creditors’ committee represents all creditors.
Stečajni sodnik nadzira postopke, medtem ko „curatore“ (upravitelj) upravlja dodelitev dolžnikovega premoženja, pri čemer odbor upnikov zastopa vse upnike.
Under this procedure, the priority of claims is established according to the rules contained in the Italian Civil Code in order to meet creditors’ claims by disposing of the company assets, which usually leads to the liquidation of the company.
Po tem postopku se določi vrstni red terjatev v skladu s pravili italijanskega civilnega zakonika, da se odplačajo terjatve upnikov s prodajo premoženja podjetja, zaradi česar se podjetje običajno likvidira.
The Commission understands from the Italian legislation in force that ‘amministrazione straordinaria’ constitutes a form of administration proceedings that applies to large insolvent companies (normally with more than 1000 employees) based on ‘restructuring plans’, so as to avoid bankruptcy.
Komisija razume, da „amministrazione straordinaria“ v veljavni italijanski zakonodaji vključuje upravne postopke, ki se uporabljajo za velika plačilno nesposobna podjetja (običajno z več kot 1000 zaposlenimi) na podlagi „načrtov za prestrukturiranje“, da se prepreči stečaj.
It is thus focused on corporate reorganisation rather than liquidation of the company.
Zato je reorganizacija podjetja bolj izpostavljena kot likvidacija podjetja.
See Commission Decision of 4.7.2006 in case NN 16/06, CIT (OJ C 244, 11.10.2006, p. 14).
Glej Odločbo Komisije z dne 4. julija 2006 v zadevi NN 16/06, CIT (UL C 244, 11.10.2006, str. 14).
Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato – Decision No 11479, Pufin/Finmek Automotive-Nicofin, of 5.12.2002.
Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato – Odločba št. 11479, Pufin/Finmek Automotive-Nicofin, z dne 5. decembra 2002.
By letter dated 5 April 2006, the Commission requested further information, which Italy supplied by letter registered as received on 29 May 2006.
Z dopisom z dne 5. aprila 2006 je Komisija pozvala Italijo, naj predloži dodatne informacije, kar je Italija storila z dopisom, evidentiranim 29. maja 2006.
A meeting with the Italian authorities took place on 9 June 2006.
Srečanje z italijanskimi organi je potekalo 9. junija 2006.
By letter registered as received on 9 August 2006, Italy submitted further information confirming that the company had been declared bankrupt by the Naples Court (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Court’) on 5 July 2006.
Z dopisom, evidentiranim 9. avgusta 2006, je Italija predložila dodatne informacije, ki potrjujejo, da je sodišče v Neaplju (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sodišče) 5. julija 2006 uvedlo stečajni postopek zoper podjetje.
Following a request by the Commission for further information dated 29 November 2006, Italy submitted part of the requested information by letter dated 7 December 2006.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 29. novembra 2006 pozvala Italijo, naj predloži dodatne informacije, Italija pa je del zahtevanih informacij predložila z dopisom z dne 7. decembra 2006.
The Commission sent a reminder on 22 December 2006 requesting Italy to submit the missing information while specifying in more detail which information would be needed.
Komisija je 22. decembra 2006 poslala opozorilo, v katerem je Italijo pozvala, naj predloži manjkajoče informacije, in natančneje opredelila, katere informacije potrebuje.
In particular, the Commission asked whether the company might foreseeably be liquidated, involving the cessation of all business activities, at the end of the insolvency proceedings or whether there was any possibility that the company’s business activities might be continued in any form, for instance as the result of a sale as a going concern.
Komisijo je zlasti zanimalo, ali je predvideno, da bo podjetje morda po koncu postopkov zaradi nesolventnosti likvidirano, vključno s prenehanjem opravljanja vseh poslovnih dejavnosti, oziroma ali obstaja kakršna koli možnost za nadaljevanje opravljanja poslovnih dejavnosti podjetja v kateri koli obliki, na primer zaradi prodaje delujočega podjetja.
An extension until 12 February 2008 was granted the same day.
Istega dne je bilo odobreno podaljšanje roka do 12. februarja 2008.
Italy provided only partial information by e-mails of 15 January 2008, 12 March 2008 and 25 March 2008.
Italija je po elektronski pošti z dne 15. januarja 2008, 12. marca 2008 in 25. marca 2008 poslala le delne informacije.
On 20 October 2008 the Commission asked for further information, which Italy provided by letter dated 30 October 2008.
Komisija je 20. oktobra 2008 pozvala Italijo, naj predloži dodatne informacije, kar je Italija storila z dopisom z dne 30. oktobra 2008.
The Italian authorities forwarded the Commission’s request to the Administrator.
Italijanski organi so o zahtevi Komisije obvestili upravitelja.
The Administrator submitted further information on 18 November 2008.
Upravitelj je predložil dodatne informacije 18. novembra 2008.
Since 2003 Ixfin has been controlled by Maxfin Srl, which, in turn, is controlled by Pufin Srl.
Od leta 2003 je podjetje Ixfin pod nadzorom podjetja Maxfin s.r.l., ki ga nadzoruje podjetje Pufin s.r.l.
Pufin Srl, which operates in business services (commercial, administrative, logistic), is the parent company of the Pufin Group, owned by the Pugliese family.
Podjetje Pufin s.r.l., ki je dejavno na področju poslovnih storitev (trgovskih, upravnih, logističnih), je matično podjetje skupine Pufin, ki je v lasti družine Pugliese.
Ixfin controls directly and indirectly four other companies, namely Nicofin Srl (99 %), Uni.com Partecipazioni Srl (100 %), Uni.com SpA.
Ixfin neposredno in posredno nadzoruje štiri druga podjetja, in sicer Nicofin s.r.l. (99 %), Uni.com Partecipazioni s.r.l. (100 %), Uni.com s.p.a.
(100 %) and Uni.com Ricerche Srl (100 %).
(100 %) in Uni.com Ricerche s.r.l. (100 %).
In December 2004 the company, with an additional loss of EUR 20 million, was sold back to the Pufin Group.
Decembra 2004 je bilo podjetje z dodatno izgubo 20 milijonov EUR spet prodano skupini Pufin.
The transaction was carried out for a purely symbolic price.
Posel je bil opravljen za simbolno ceno.
This agreement, signed by the Italian institutions, the unions and the employers’ organisation Confindustria, allowed, by way of various measures, for an investment amounting to between EUR 40 million and EUR 60 million. According to the information available to the Commission at that stage, it appeared that this agreement was aimed at restoring production and preserving employment at the industrial sites in the province of Caserta.
Ta sporazum, ki so ga podpisali italijanski organi, sindikati in organizacija delodajalcev Confindustria, je na podlagi različnih ukrepov omogočil naložbo med 40 milijoni EUR in 60 milijoni EUR. Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je imela Komisija takrat na voljo, se je zdelo, da je bil cilj tega sporazuma obnovitev proizvodnje in ohranitev delovnih mest v industrijskih krajih province Caserta.
As for the Protocollo, the Administrator explained that that agreement was adopted by the Prime Minister’s Office on 20 June 2007.
Upravitelj je v zvezi s sporazumom Protocollo pojasnil, da ga je urad predsednika vlade sprejel 20. junija 2007.
On 25 October 2007, a coordination group met which was supposed to draw up a more precise investment programme.
Skupina za usklajevanje, ki naj bi pripravila natančnejši program naložb, se je sestala 25. oktobra 2007.
First, the Italian authorities confirmed that the guaranteed was limited to a EUR 15 million loan and was thus not raised to EUR 17,3 million. They emphasised, moreover, that the amount of rescue aid had been calculated according to the formula contained in the Annex to the Guidelines.
Italijanski organi so najprej potrdili, da je bilo jamstvo omejeno na posojilo v znesku 15 milijonov EUR in se zato ni povečalo na 17,3 milijona EUR. Poleg tega so poudarili, da se je znesek pomoči za reševanje izračunal na podlagi formule iz priloge k smernicam.
Second, the Ministry, by its submissions dated 21 April 2008 and 30 October 2008, informed the Commission that the Bank had called the guarantee on the EUR 15 million loan plus relevant interest, for a total amount of EUR 15154457,72, on 3 July 2006. The Italian authorities also forwarded a letter of 20 September 2006, on the basis of which the Ministry of the Economy and Finance paid the Bank on 27 September 2006.
Poleg tega je ministrstvo z dopisoma z dne 21. aprila 2008 in 30. oktobra 2008 obvestilo Komisijo, da je banka 3. julija 2006 unovčila jamstvo za posojilo v znesku 15 milijonov EUR skupaj s pripadajočimi obrestmi v skupnem znesku 15154457,72 EUR. Italijanski organi so prav tako predložili dopis z dne 20. septembra 2006, na podlagi katerega je ministrstvo za gospodarstvo in finance 27. septembra 2006 izvršilo plačilo banki.
By this payment, the Ministry obtained the rights as creditor for that amount in respect of Ixfin.
S tem plačilom je ministrstvo pridobilo pravice upnika za ta znesek v zvezi s podjetjem Ixfin.
In the present case, signs of insolvency, namely the inability of the company to fulfil its obligations in a timely manner, appeared as early as September 2004.
V zadevnem primeru so se znaki plačilne nesposobnosti, in sicer nezmožnost podjetja, da pravočasno izpolni svoje obveznosti, pojavili že septembra 2004.
Moreover, Italy claimed that it granted rescue aid before the notification due to urgent liquidity needs of the company.
Poleg tega je Italija trdila, da je odobrila pomoč za reševanje pred priglasitvijo zaradi nujnih likvidnostnih potreb podjetja.
The financial results of Pufin and Maxfin from 2003 to 2005 are shown in Table 2.
Finančni rezultati podjetja Pufin in podjetja Maxfin od leta 2003 do leta 2005 so navedeni v preglednici 2.
In the present case, the period of six months during which rescue aid can be granted according to point 25(c) of the Guidelines started on 30 December 2005 and elapsed on 30 June 2006.
V zadevnem primeru se je obdobje šestih mesecev, v katerem se lahko v skladu s točko 25(c) dodeli pomoč za reševanje, začelo 30. decembra 2005 in končalo 30. junija 2006.
According to the last clause of point 25(a) of the Guidelines, any loan must be reimbursed and any guarantee must come to an end within a period of not more than six months after the disbursement of the first instalment to the firm.
V skladu z zadnjim stavkom točke 25(a) smernic je treba vsako posojilo odplačati, vsako jamstvo pa mora prenehati veljati v obdobju največ šest mesecev po izplačilu prvega obroka podjetju.
In quantifying the amount of aid, the Commission would refer to paragraph 4.1(a) of the Notice, where it is stated that ‘for companies in difficulty, a market guarantor, if any, would, at the time the guarantee is granted charge a high premium given the expected rate of default.
Komisija se pri določitvi zneska pomoči sklicuje na odstavek 4.1(a) obvestila, ki navaja, da „bo tržni porok, če obstaja, podjetjem v težavah v trenutku dodelitve poroštva zaračunal visoko premijo zaradi pričakovane stopnje tveganja neplačila.
If the likelihood that the borrower will not be able to repay the loan becomes particularly high, this market rate may not exist and in exceptional circumstances the aid element of the guarantee may turn out to be as high as the amount effectively covered by that guarantee’.
Če postane verjetnost, da posojilojemalec ne bo mogel odplačati posojila, zelo visoka, mogoče te tržne stopnje ni, v izjemnih okoliščinah pa je lahko element pomoči poroštva celo enak znesku, ki ga dejansko krije navedeno poroštvo“.
Second, after the opening of the formal investigation, the Italian authorities submitted to the Commission the balance sheets of Maxfin of 30 April 2005, 30 April 2006 and 30 June 2006 and balance sheets of Pufin of 30 June 2004, 30 June 2005 and 30 June 2006.
Poleg tega so po sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave italijanski organi Komisiji predložili bilance stanja podjetja Maxfin z dopisi z dne 30. aprila 2005, 30. aprila 2006 in 30. junija 2006 ter bilance stanja podjetja Pufin z dopisi z dne 30. junija 2004, 30. junija 2005 in 30. junija 2006.
on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and Bosnia and Herzegovina on certain aspects of air services
o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo ter Bosno in Hercegovino o nekaterih vidikih zračnega prevoza