natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The highest average value shall constitute the result of the test.’
Najvišja povprečna vrednost pomeni rezultat preskusa.“
AMENDMENT TO ANNEX IV OF CHAPTER 9 OF DIRECTIVE 97/24/EC
SPREMEMBA PRILOGE IV K POGLAVJU 9 DIREKTIVE 97/24/ES
Annex IV of Chapter 9 of Directive 97/24/EC is amended as follows:
Priloga IV k poglavju 9 Direktive 97/24/ES se spremeni:
an electrical energy storage device (e.g.: battery, capacitor, flywheel/generator etc.)….’
naprave za shranjevanje električne energije (npr.: akumulator, kondenzator, vztrajnik/generator itd.)“
The following point 2.2.4.5 is inserted:
Vstavi se naslednja točka 2.2.4.5:
Condition A: Batteries shall be at their maximum state of charge; if more than one “hybrid mode” is available, the most electric hybrid mode shall be selected for the test
Pogoj A: akumulatorji so v stanju maksimalne napolnjenosti; če je na voljo več kot en ‚hibridni način‘, se za preskus izbere najbolj električni hibridni način;
The following point 2.2.5.5 is inserted:
Vstavi se naslednja točka 2.2.5.5:
If the average of four results of Condition A and if thes average of four results of Condition B do not exceed the maximum permissible level for the category to which the vehicle being tested belongs, the limits laid down in point 2.2.1 shall be deemed as being complied with.
Če povprečje štirih rezultatov pogoja A in povprečje štirih rezultatov pogoja B ne presega maksimalne dovoljenje ravni za kategorijo, v katero spada preskušano vozilo, velja, da so izpolnjene zahteve za mejne vrednosti iz točke 2.2.1.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 30 April 2010 at the latest.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne zaradi uskladitve s to direktivo, najpozneje do 30. aprila 2010.
To measure the electric driving range the end of the test criteria is reached when the vehicle is not able to meet the target curve, up to 50 km/h, or the maximum speed in pure electric mode, as declared by manufacturer, or when an indication from the standard on-board instrumentation is given to the driver to stop the vehicle or when the electrical energy storage device has reached its minimum level of charge.
Za merjenje električnega dosega med vožnjo je konec preskusa dosežen, kadar vozilo ne more doseči ciljne krivulje do 50 km/h ali maksimalne hitrosti v povsem električnem načinu delovanja, kakor jo je opredelil proizvajalec, ali kadar standardni vgrajeni instrumenti voznika opozorijo, naj ustavi vozilo, ali kadar je naprava za shranjevanje električne energije dosegla stanje minimalne napolnjenosti.
Then the vehicle shall be slowed down to 5 km/h by releasing the accelerator handle, without touching the brake and then stopped by braking.
V tem primeru je treba vozilo upočasniti na 5 km/h, tako da se popusti ročica za plin brez dotikanja zavore, in ga nato ustaviti z zaviranjem.
Directive 2009/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2009/109/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Council Directives 77/91/EEC, 78/855/EEC and 82/891/EEC, and Directive 2005/56/EC as regards reporting and documentation requirements in the case of mergers and divisions
o spremembi direktiv Sveta 77/91/EGS, 78/855/EGS in 82/891/EGS ter Direktive 2005/56/ES glede zahtev za poročanje in dokumentiranje v primeru združitev in delitev
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
EVROPSKI PARLAMENT IN SVET EVROPSKE UNIJE STA,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 44(2)(g) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti točke (g) člena 44(2) Pogodbe,
The European Council agreed, at its meeting on 8 and 9 March 2007, that administrative burdens on companies should be reduced by 25 % by the year 2012 in order to enhance the competitiveness of companies in the Community.
Evropski svet se je na zasedanju 8. in 9. marca 2007 dogovoril, da je treba upravne obremenitve družb do leta 2012 zmanjšati za 25 %, da bi se izboljšala konkurenčnost družb v Skupnosti.
Company law has been identified as one area imposing on companies numerous information obligations, some of which seem outdated or excessive.
Pravo družb je opredeljeno kot področje, ki nalaga družbam številne obveznosti obveščanja, od katerih se zdijo nekatere zastarele ali pretirane.
It is therefore appropriate to review those obligations and, where appropriate, to reduce the administrative burdens weighing on companies within the Community to the minimum needed in order to protect the interests of other stakeholders.
Te obveznosti je torej treba pregledati in, če je to primerno, zmanjšati upravne obremenitve družb v Skupnosti na najmanjšo raven, ki je nujna za zagotavljanje zaščite interesov drugih zainteresiranih strani.
The scope of Second Council Directive 77/91/EEC of 13 December 1976 on coordination of safeguards which, for the protection of the interests of members and others, are required by Member States of companies within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 58 of the Treaty, in respect of the formation of public limited liability companies and the maintenance and alteration of their capital, with a view to making such safeguards equivalent [3], and of Third Council Directive 78/855/EEC of 9 October 1978 based on Article 54(3)(g) of the Treaty concerning mergers of public limited liability companies [4], should be adapted in order to reflect changes in Finnish company law.
Področje uporabe Druge direktive Sveta 77/91/EGS z dne 13. decembra 1976 o uskladitvi zaščitnih ukrepov za varovanje interesov družbenikov in tretjih oseb, ki jih države članice zahtevajo od gospodarskih družb v skladu z drugim odstavkom člena 58 Pogodbe glede ustanavljanja delniških družb ter ohranjanja in spreminjanja njihovega kapitala, zato da se oblikujejo zaščitni ukrepi z enakim učinkom v vsej Skupnosti [3], in Tretje direktive Sveta 78/855/EGS z dne 9. oktobra 1978 o združitvi delniških družb, ki temelji na členu 54(3)(g) Pogodbe [4], je treba prilagoditi v skladu s spremembami finskega prava družb.
Company websites or other websites offer, in certain cases, an alternative to publication via the companies registers.
Spletne strani družb ali druge spletne strani v nekaterih primerih nudijo alternativno možnost za objavo v registru družb.
Member States should be able to designate those other websites which companies may use free of charge for such publication, such as websites of business associations or chambers of commerce or the central electronic platform referred to in First Council Directive 68/151/EEC of 9 March 1968 on coordination of safeguards which, for the protection of the interests of members and others, are required by Member States of companies within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 58 of the Treaty, with a view to making such safeguards equivalent throughout the Community [5].
Državam članicam bi morali omogočiti, da določijo tista druga internetna spletišča, ki jih lahko družbe brezplačno uporabljajo za takšno objavljanje, to pa so na primer spletišča poslovnih združenj, gospodarskih zbornic ali osrednja elektronska platforma iz Prve direktive Sveta 68/151/EGS z dne 9. marca 1968 o uskladitvi zaščitnih ukrepov za varovanje interesov družbenikov in tretjih oseb, ki jih države članice zahtevajo od gospodarskih družb v skladu z drugim odstavkom člena 58 Pogodbe, da se oblikujejo zaščitni ukrepi z enakim učinkom v vsej Skupnosti [5].
Where the possibility exists of using company or other websites for publication of draft terms of merger and/or division and of other documents that have to be made available to shareholders and creditors in the process, guarantees relating to the security of the website and the authenticity of the documents should be met.
Če obstaja možnost uporabe spletnih strani družbe ali drugih internetnih spletnih strani za objavo načrta združitve in/ali delitve in drugih dokumentov, ki jih je treba dati na voljo delničarjem in upnikom v postopku, je treba izpolniti pogoje za zagotovitev varnosti spletne strani in pristnosti dokumentov.
The requirements concerning disclosure of draft terms of merger in cross-border mergers pursuant to Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies [6] should be similar to those applicable to domestic mergers and divisions pursuant to Directive 78/855/EEC and Sixth Council Directive 82/891/EEC of 17 December 1982 based on Article 54(3)(g) of the Treaty, concerning the division of public limited liability companies [7].
Zahteve po razkritju v zvezi z načrti čezmejnih združitev v skladu z Direktivo 2005/56/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. oktobra 2005 o čezmejnih združitvah kapitalskih družb [6] bi morale biti podobne tistim, ki veljajo za domače združitve in delitve v skladu z Direktivo 78/855/EGS in Šesto direktivo Sveta 82/891/EGS z dne 17. decembra 1982 o delitvi delniških družb, ki temelji na členu 54(3)(g) Pogodbe [7].
Member States should be able to provide that the extensive reporting or information requirements relating to the merger or division of companies, laid down in Article 9 and Article 11(1)(c) of Directive 78/855/EEC and in Article 7 and Article 9(1)(c) of Directive 82/891/EEC, need not be complied with if all the shareholders of the companies involved in the merger or division agree that such compliance may be dispensed with.
Državam članicam bi morali omogočiti, da določijo, da ni treba izpolnjevati obsežnih zahtev za poročanje in obveščanje glede združitve ali delitve družb, kot je določeno v členu 9 in točki (c) člena 11(1) Direktive 78/855/EGS ter členu 7 in točki (c) člena 9(1) Direktive 82/891/EGS, če se s tem strinjajo vsi delničarji družb, udeleženih pri združitvi ali delitvi.
Any modification of Directives 78/855/EEC and 82/891/EEC allowing such agreement by shareholders should be without prejudice to the systems of protection of the interests of creditors of the companies involved and to rules aimed at ensuring the provision of necessary information to the employees of those companies and to public authorities, such as tax authorities, controlling the merger or division in accordance with existing Community law.
Kakršne koli spremembe direktiv 78/855/EGS in 82/891/EGS, ki dovoljujejo takšen dogovor delničarjev, ne smejo posegati v sisteme zaščite interesov upnikov udeleženih družb, pa tudi ne v pravila za zagotavljanje potrebnih informacij zaposlenim v teh družbah in javnim organom, kot so davčni organi, ki nadzirajo združitve ali delitve v skladu z veljavnim pravom Skupnosti.
It is not necessary to impose the requirement to draw up an accounting statement where an issuer whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market publishes half-yearly financial reports in accordance with Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market [8].
Zahteva za pripravo bilance stanja ni potrebna, če izdajatelj vrednostnih papirjev, ki kotirajo na borzi, objavlja polletna računovodska poročila v skladu z Direktivo 2004/109/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. decembra 2004 o uskladitvi zahtev v zvezi s preglednostjo informacij o izdajateljih, katerih vrednostni papirji so sprejeti v trgovanje na reguliranem trgu [8].
An independent expert’s report as provided for under Directive 77/91/EEC is often not needed where an independent expert’s report protecting the interests of shareholders or creditors also has to be drawn up in the context of the merger or the division.
Poročilo neodvisnega izvedenca, kot je določeno v Direktivi 77/91/EGS, pogosto ni potrebno, če je treba pripraviti poročilo neodvisnega izvedenca za zaščito interesov delničarjev ali upnikov tudi v okviru združitve ali delitve.
Member States should therefore have the possibility in such cases of dispensing companies from the reporting requirement under Directive 77/91/EEC or of providing that both reports may be drawn up by the same expert.
V takih primerih je treba državam članicam omogočiti, da družbe izvzamejo iz zahteve za poročanje iz Direktive 77/91/EGS ali da določijo, da lahko obe poročili pripravi isti izvedenec.
Mergers between parent companies and their subsidiaries have a reduced economic impact on shareholders and creditors where the parent company’s holding in the subsidiary amounts to 90 % or more of the shares and other securities conferring the right to vote.
Združitve med matičnimi in hčerinskimi družbami imajo manjši ekonomski vpliv na delničarje in upnike, če lastništvo matične družbe znaša 90 % ali več delnic in drugih vrednostnih papirjev v hčerinski družbi, ki dajejo glasovalno pravico.
The same applies to certain divisions, in particular when companies are split into new companies that are owned by the shareholders in the proportion to their rights in the company being divided.
Enako velja za nekatere delitve, zlasti ko so družbe razdeljene v nove družbe, katerih lastniki so delničarji v sorazmerju s svojimi pravicami v družbi, ki se deli.
In those cases, the reporting requirements laid down by Directives 78/855/EEC and 82/891/EEC should therefore be reduced.
V takih primerih je treba zato zmanjšati zahteve za poročanje iz Direktive 78/855/EGS in Direktive 82/891/EGS.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely to reduce administrative burdens relating in particular to publication and documentation obligations of public limited liability companies within the Community, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States and can therefore, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Ker ciljev te direktive, in sicer zmanjšanja upravnih obremenitev zlasti v zvezi z dolžnostmi glede objave in dokumentiranja za delniške družbe v Skupnosti, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in jih je zato zaradi obsega in učinkov lažje doseči na ravni Skupnosti, lahko Skupnost sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.
Directives 77/91/EEC, 78/855/EEC, 82/891/EEC and 2005/56/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Zato je treba direktive 77/91/EGS, 78/855/EGS, 82/891/EGS in 2005/56/ES ustrezno spremeniti.
In accordance with point 34 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on better lawmaking [9], Member States are encouraged to draw up, for themselves and in the interests of the Community, their own tables illustrating, as far as possible, the correlation between this Directive and the transposition measures, and to make them public,
V skladu s točko 34 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje [9] se države članice spodbuja, da za svoje potrebe in v interesu Skupnosti pripravijo in objavijo tabele, ki bodo kar najbolj prikazale primerjavo med to direktivo in ukrepi za njen prenos –
Amendments to Directive 77/91/EEC
Spremembe Direktive 77/91/EGS
in Article 1(1), the fourteenth indent is replaced by the following:
v členu 1(1) se štirinajsta alinea nadomesti z:
in Finland: julkinen osakeyhtiö/publikt aktiebolag’;
na Finskem: julkinen osakeyhtiö/publikt aktiebolag“;
in Article 10, the following paragraph is added:
v členu 10 se doda naslednji odstavek:
Member States may decide not to apply this Article to the formation of a new company by way of merger or division where an independent expert’s report on the draft terms of merger or division is drawn up.
Države članice se lahko odločijo, da tega člena ne uporabijo za ustanovitev nove družbe z združitvijo ali delitvijo, če neodvisen izvedenec pripravi poročilo o načrtu združitve ali delitve.
Where Member States decide to apply this Article in the cases referred to in the first subparagraph, they may provide that the report under this Article and the independent expert’s report on the draft terms of merger or division may be drawn up by the same expert or experts.’;
Če se države članice v primerih iz prvega pododstavka odločijo za uporabo tega člena, lahko določijo, da lahko poročilo iz tega člena in poročilo neodvisnega strokovnjaka o načrtu združitve ali delitve pripravijo isti izvedenci.“;
Article 27(3) is replaced by the following:
v členu 27 se odstavek 3 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Member States may decide not to apply paragraph 2 in the event of an increase in subscribed capital made in order to give effect to a merger, a division or a public offer for the purchase or exchange of shares and to pay the shareholders of the company which is being absorbed or divided or which is the object of the public offer for the purchase or exchange of shares.
Države članice se lahko odločijo, da ne uporabijo odstavka 2 v primeru, ko se vpisani kapital poveča zaradi izvedbe združitve, delitve ali javne ponudbe za nakup ali zamenjavo delnic ter zaradi plačila delničarjem družbe, ki se prevzema, deli ali ki je predmet javne ponudbe za nakup ali zamenjavo delnic.
In the case of a merger or a division, however, Member States shall apply the first subparagraph only where an independent expert’s report on the draft terms of merger or division is drawn up.
Vendar se v primeru združitve ali delitve prvi pododstavek uporablja le, če neodvisen izvedenec pripravi poročilo o načrtu združitve ali delitve.
Where Member States decide to apply paragraph 2 in the case of a merger or a division, they may provide that the report under this Article and the independent expert’s report on the draft terms of merger or division may be drawn up by the same expert or experts.’.
Če se države članice v primeru združitve ali delitve odločijo za uporabo odstavka 2, lahko določijo, da poročilo iz tega člena in poročilo neodvisnega strokovnjaka o načrtu združitve ali delitve pripravijo isti izvedenci.“.
Amendments to Directive 78/855/EEC
Spremembe Direktive 78/855/EGS
Finland: julkinen osakeyhtiö/publikt aktiebolag’;
na Finskem: julkinen osakeyhtiö/publikt aktiebolag“;
in Article 6, the following paragraphs are added:
v členu 6 se dodajo naslednji odstavki:
‘Any of the merging companies shall be exempt from the publication requirement laid down in Article 3 of Directive 68/151/EEC if, for a continuous period beginning at least one month before the day fixed for the general meeting which is to decide on the draft terms of merger and ending not earlier than the conclusion of that meeting, it makes the draft terms of such merger available on its website free of charge for the public.
„Vse družbe, vključene v delitev, so izvzete od zahteve po objavi iz člena 3 Direktive 68/151/EGS, če za neprekinjeno obdobje z začetkom najmanj en mesec pred predvidenim datumom skupščine delničarjev, ki odloča o načrtu združitve in se ne konča pred zaključkom skupščine, na svoji spletni strani zagotovijo dostop do načrta takšne združitve, ki je javen in brezplačen.
Member States shall not subject that exemption to any requirements or constraints other than those which are necessary in order to ensure the security of the website and the authenticity of the documents, and may impose such requirements or constraints only to the extent that they are proportionate in order to achieve those objectives.
Države članice za to izvzetje ne določijo nikakršnih zahtev ali omejitev, razen tistih, ki so nujne za zagotovitev varnosti spletne strani in pristnosti dokumentov ter le do take mere, da so te zahteve in omejitve sorazmerne z izpolnitvijo teh ciljev.
By way of derogation from the second paragraph, Member States may require that publication be effected via the central electronic platform referred to in Article 3(4) of Directive 68/151/EEC.
Z odstopanjem od drugega odstavka lahko države članice zahtevajo, da se razkritje iz omenjenega odstavka objavi na osrednji elektronski platformi iz člena 3(4) Direktive 68/151/EGS.
Member States may alternatively require that such publication be made on any other website designated by them for that purpose.
Države članice lahko zahtevajo možnost objave na kateri koli drugi spletni strani, ki jo za ta namen določijo.
Where Member States avail themselves of one of those possibilities, they shall ensure that companies are not charged a specific fee for such publication.
Če država članica uporabi katero koli od teh možnosti, potem zagotovi, da se družbam za to objavo ne zaračuna posebne pristojbine.
Where a website other than the central electronic platform is used, a reference giving access to that website shall be published on the central electronic platform at least one month before the day fixed for the general meeting.
Če se uporabi spletna stran, ki ni osrednja elektronska platforma, se sklic, ki omogoča dostop do te spletne strani, objavi na osrednji elektronski platformi najmanj mesec dni pred predvidenim datumom skupščine delničarjev.
That reference shall include the date of publication of the draft terms of merger on the website and shall be accessible to the public free of charge.
Ta sklic vključuje datum objave načrta združitve na spletni strani in je brezplačno dostopen za javnost.
Companies shall not be charged a specific fee for such publication.
Družbam se za to objavo ne zaračuna posebne pristojbine.
The prohibition precluding the charging to companies of a specific fee for publication, laid down in the third and fourth paragraphs, shall not affect the ability of Member States to pass on to companies the costs in respect of the central electronic platform.
Prepoved iz tretjega in četrtega odstavka, v skladu s katero se družbam za objavo ne sme zaračunati posebne pristojbine, ne vpliva na možnost držav članic, da na družbe prenesejo stroške v zvezi z osrednjo elektronsko platformo.
Member States may require companies to maintain the information for a specific period after the general meeting on their website or, where applicable, on the central electronic platform or the other website designated by the Member State concerned.
Države članice lahko od družb zahtevajo, da informacije ohranijo določen čas po generalni skupščini na njihovi spletni strani ali po potrebi na osrednji elektronski platformi oziroma drugi spletni strani, ki jo določi zadevna država članica.
Member States may determine the consequences of temporary disruption of access to the website or to the central electronic platform, caused by technical or other factors.’;
Države članice lahko opredelijo posledice začasno onemogočenega dostopa do spletne strani in začasnih motenj osrednje elektronske platforme zaradi tehničnih ali drugih dejavnikov.“;
‘For the purposes of point (b) of the first paragraph, Article 11(2), (3) and (4) shall apply.’;
„Za namene točke (b) prvega odstavka se uporablja člen 11(2), (3) in (4).“
Article 9 is replaced by the following:
člen 9 se nadomesti:
The administrative or management bodies of each of the merging companies shall draw up a detailed written report explaining the draft terms of merger and setting out the legal and economic grounds for them, in particular the share exchange ratio.
Upravni ali poslovodni organi posameznih družb, ki se združujejo, pripravijo podrobno pisno poročilo, v katerem je obrazložen načrt združitve ter ki opredeljuje pravne in ekonomske razloge načrta, zlasti menjalno razmerje delnic.
That report shall also describe any special valuation difficulties which have arisen.
V poročilu so prav tako opisane morebitne posebne težave, ki so se pojavile pri vrednotenju.