natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Results of controls on consignments of crustaceans from India as regards nitrofurans and their metabolites
Rezultati pregleda pošiljk rakov iz Indije v zvezi z nitrofurani in njihovimi metaboliti
Type of crustaceans
Vrsta rakov
CCα of the confirmatory method
CC-alfa potrditvene metode
Decision (Rejected/Redispatched/Destroyed/Placed on the Market)
Odločitev (zavrnitev/ponovna odprema/uničenje/dano v promet)
extending without limitations the Community recognition of the Polish Register of Shipping
o podaljšanju priznanja poljskemu registru ladij (Polski Rejestr Statków) s strani Skupnosti brez omejitev
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations [1], and in particular Article 15 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 391/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o skupnih pravilih in standardih za organizacije za tehnični nadzor in pregled ladij [1] in zlasti člena 15 Uredbe,
By Decision 2006/660/EC [2], the Commission granted the Polish Register of Shipping a limited recognition for a period of three years.
Z Odločbo 2006/660/ES [2] je Komisija dodelila poljskemu registru ladij (Polski Rejestr Statków) omejeno priznanje za tri leta.
This recognition is granted to organisations known as classification societies, which fulfil all criteria other than those set out under paragraphs 2 and 3 of the ‘General Minimum Criteria’ section A of the Annex to Council Directive 94/57/EC of 22 November 1994 on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations [3].
To priznanje se dodeljuje organizacijam, poznanim kot klasifikacijski zavodi, ki izpolnjujejo vsa merila, razen tistih, določenih v odstavkih 2 in 3 oddelka A „Splošne minimalne zahteve“ iz Priloge k Direktivi Sveta 94/57/ES z dne 22. novembra 1994 o skupnih predpisih in standardih za organizacije, pooblaščene za inšpekcijski pregled in nadzor ladij ter za ustrezne ukrepe pomorskih uprav [3].
The effects of this recognition were limited to the Czech Republic, Cyprus, Lithuania, Malta, Poland and Slovakia.
Ta omejena priznanja so veljala izključno za Češko, Ciper, Litvo, Malto, Poljsko in Slovaško.
The Commission assessed the Polish Register of Shipping in accordance with Article 11(3) of Directive 94/57/EC.
Komisija je ocenila poljski register ladij (Polski Rejestr Statków) v skladu s členom 11(3) Direktive 94/57/ES.
The assessment was based on the results of four fact-finding inspections performed in 2007 by experts of the European Maritime Safety Agency in accordance with Article 2(b)(iii) of Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4].
Ta ocena temelji na ugotovitvah štirih inšpekcijskih pregledov, ki so jih v letu 2007 opravili strokovnjaki Evropske agencije za pomorsko varnost v skladu s členom 2(b)(iii) Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1406/2002 [4].
The Czech, Cypriot, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish and Slovak administrations were invited to take part in the assessment.
Češka, ciprska, litovska, malteška, poljska in slovaška uprava so bile povabljene k sodelovanju pri ocenjevanju.
The Commission has also taken into consideration the findings of two further inspections carried out by the European Maritime Safety Agency in April and May 2009 in order to examine the activities of the Polish Register of Shipping in the supervision of new ship construction and to verify the corrective action implemented by the Polish Register of Shipping in response to the Commission’s assessment.
Komisija je upoštevala tudi ugotovitve dveh nadaljnjih inšpekcijskih pregledov, ki jih je opravila Evropska agencija za pomorsko varnost v aprilu in maju 2009, da bi pregledala dejavnosti poljskega registra ladij pri nadzoru gradnje novih ladij in preverila korektivne ukrepe, ki jih je ta opravil kot odziv na oceno Komisije.
Where shortcomings have been identified, the Polish Register of Shipping has promptly implemented appropriate and sufficient corrective action in most cases.
Polski Rejestr Statków je v večini primerov, v katerih so bile ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti, nemudoma izvedel ustrezne in zadostne korektivne ukrepe.
The outstanding shortcomings mainly concern the implementation of its rules and procedures, particularly as regards the control of the quality of shipyards and verification of new constructions, the training and qualification of surveyors and transfer of class.
Preostale pomanjkljivosti so večinoma na področju izvajanje pravil in postopkov, zlasti pri nadzoru kakovosti ladjedelnic in preverjanju novih gradenj, usposabljanja in kvalifikacij inšpektorjev ter prenosa ladij.
The Polish Register of Shipping has therefore been invited to implement further corrective action in this respect.
V zvezi s tem je bil zato Polski Rejestr Statków pozvan, da izvede nadaljnje korektivne ukrepe.
Despite their seriousness, these shortcomings do not at present warrant calling into question the overall quality of the organisation’s main systems and control mechanisms.
Kljub resnim pomanjkljivostim te za zdaj ne puščajo dvoma v celovito kakovost glavnih sistemov in nadzornih mehanizmov organizacije.
In the meantime, Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 has entered into force.
V tem času je začela veljati tudi Uredba (ES) št. 391/2009.
It provides that the organisations which, at the date of its entry into force, have been granted recognition in accordance with Directive 94/57/EC shall retain their recognition.
Uredba določa, da lahko organizacije, ki so bile ob začetku njene veljavnosti priznane v skladu z Direktivo 94/57/ES, ostanejo priznane.
Those recognitions have to be examined by the Commission by 17 June 2010, with a view to deciding whether the limitations are to be replaced by others or removed.
Ta priznanja mora do 17. junija 2010 pregledati Komisija, da odloči, ali bodo omejitve zamenjane z drugačnimi ali odpravljene.
The information available to the Commission based on the assessment and inspections made shows that the Polish Register of Shipping in general complies with the requirements and obligations laid down in Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 in all trades and for all kinds of ships.
Informacije, ki so na voljo Komisiji in temeljijo na oceni in opravljenih inšpekcijskih pregledih, kažejo, da poljski register ladij večinoma izpolnjuje zahteve in obveznosti iz Uredbe (ES) št. 391/2009 za vse vrste prevoza in vse vrste ladij.
Based on the data last published by the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State control, which concern the inspections carried out by the signatory parties until 2008, the rate of detention of ships for reasons relating to the certificates delivered to them by the Polish Register of Shipping in the period 2006-2008 remained at 0,77 % of the total number of inspections, while the average rate for recognised organisations was 0,34 %.
Glede na podatke, ki jih je nazadnje objavil Pariški memorandum o soglasju glede nadzora, ki ga opravlja inšpekcija za varnost plovbe države pristanišča, v zvezi z inšpekcijskimi pregledi, ki so jih do leta 2008 opravile njegove podpisnice, je bil delež ladij, zadržanih iz razlogov, povezanih z njihovimi spričevali, ki jih je izdal Polski Rejester Statków v obdobju 2006–2008, 0,77 % vseh inšpekcijskih pregledov, povprečni delež pri priznanih organizacijah pa je bil 0,34 %.
An extension of the Community recognition of the Polish Register of Shipping should enter into force on 29 September 2009 in order to ensure its continuity.
Podaljšanje priznanja poljskemu registru ladij (Polski Rejestr Statków) s strani Skupnosti bi moralo začeti veljati 29. septembra 2009, da bi se tako zagotovila njegova neprekinjenost.
The Community recognition of the Polish Register of Shipping is hereby extended without limitations with effect from 29 September 2009.
Skupnost s tem podaljšuje priznanje poljskemu registru ladij (Polski Rejestr Statków) brez omejitev z učinkom od 29. septembra 2009.
OJ L 131, 28.5.2009, p. 11.
UL L 131, 28.5.2009, str. 11.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the COSS Committee set up by Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009,
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za varnost na morju in preprečevanje onesnaževanja z ladij (COSS), ustanovljenega v skladu s členom 12 Uredbe (ES) št. 391/2009 –
on State Aid C 11/2007 which Italy has implemented in favour of the company Ottana Energia Srl
o državni pomoči C 11/2007 Italije za podjetje Ottana Energia S.r.l.
(notified under document C(2008) 3117)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 3117)
On 23 February 2006, the Italian authorities notified the Commission a rescue aid to Ottana Energia Srl (Ottana Energia), which had been put into effect on 29 December 2005, i.e. before the notification.
Italijanski organi so Komisiji 23. februarja 2006 priglasili pomoč za reševanje družbe Ottana Energia S.r.l. (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Ottana Energia“), ki je bila dodeljena 29. decembra 2005, to je pred priglasitvijo.
On 14 July 2006, the Italian authorities notified a restructuring plan.
Italijanski organi so 14. julija 2006 priglasili načrt prestrukturiranja.
Such plan would have automatically resulted in the prolongation of the rescue aid pursuant to point 26 of the guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty [2] (hereinafter guidelines).
Ta načrt bi bil samodejno uresničen s podaljšanjem pomoči za reševanje, skladno s točko 26 Smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu „smernice“).
On 6 December 2006, the Commission with decision C(2006) 5829 (hereafter the rescue decision) indicated that it had no objections against the rescue aid.
Komisija je 6. decembra 2006 v Odločbi C(2006) 5829 (v nadaljnjem besedilu „odločba o reševanju“) navedla, da ne nasprotuje pomoči za reševanje.
As the restructuring plan appeared however not credible the decision rejected its capability to prolong the rescue aid and ruled that the rescue aid should end on 8 January 2007.
Kljub temu je menila, da načrt prestrukturiranja, ki ni ustrezal dogovorjenim namenom, ni bil upravičen do podaljšanja pomoči za reševanje, in izjavila, da je treba 8. januarja 2007 pomoč ustaviti.
As the rescue aid was not terminated, the Commission on the basis of point 27 needed to follow up on the illegal rescue aid.
Ker pomoči za reševanje niso ustavili, je morala Komisija ukrepati zaradi nezakonite pomoči za reševanje na podlagi točke 27 smernic.
By letter dated 4 April 2007 the Commission informed Italy that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in this respect.
Z dopisom z dne 4. aprila 2007 je Komisija Italijo obvestila o odločitvi, da bo začela postopek o zadevi v smislu člena 88(2) Pogodbe.
The Commission also raised doubts about the compatibility of the restructuring aid.
Poleg tega je Komisija v dopisu izrazila dvome o združljivosti pomoči za prestrukturiranje.
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3].
Odločba Komisije o začetku postopka je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3].
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the aid/measure.
Komisija je pozvala vse zainteresirane stranke, naj predložijo svoje pripombe glede pomoči.
The Commission received no comments from interested parties.
Vendar zainteresirane stranke niso poslale nobenih pripomb.
Italy submitted observations by letter dated 22 May 2007.
Italija je svoje pripombe poslala v dopisu z dne 22. maja 2007.
Additional information was requested by letters of 11 July 2007 and 17 October 2007 and 20 December 2007 which was submitted on 31 August 2007, 12 November 2007 and 13 March 2008.
Druge informacije je Komisija zahtevala v dopisih z dne 11. julija, 17. oktobra in 20. decembra 2007. Zahtevane informacije so bile poslane 31. avgusta in 12. novembra 2007 ter 13. marca 2008.
In addition, a meeting was held between Commissions services and the Italian authorities on 7 December 2007.
Poleg tega so se 7. decembra 2007 sestali Komisija in italijanski organi. Potekala je tudi izmenjava elektronske pošte.
In addition, several e-mail exchanges took place; the latest replies by Italy were provided on 14 May 2008 and 28 May 2008.
Italija je zadnje odgovore poslala 14. in 28. maja 2008.
Ottana Energia is a local utility company situated in the province of Nuoro in Sardinia [4].
Ottana Energia je družba za lokalne javne storitve v pokrajini Nuoro na Sardiniji [4].
It is owned by PC holding, which is a holding company for Ottana Energia by a private person and has no significant other activities.
Zdaj je v lasti družbe PC Holding, ki vodi finančno poslovanje družbe Ottana Energia, njena lastnica pa je fizična oseba, ki ne opravlja drugih pomembnejših dejavnosti.
Ottana Energia has about 115 employees and in rescue decision it was held that it can be considered SME [5].
V družbi Ottana Energia je približno 115 zaposlenih in v odločbi o reševanju je bilo ugotovljeno, da jo je mogoče uvrstiti v kategorijo MSP [5].
Given that it has more than 50 employees it is however not a small enterprise.
Glede na to, da ima več kot 50 zaposlenih, to ni malo podjetje.
Ottana Energia operates a thermoelectric power station which was built to meet the electrical and thermal needs of the Ottana industrial site.
Družba Ottana Energia upravlja termoelektrarno, ki je bila zgrajena, da bi industrijsko cono Ottana oskrbovala z električno in toplotno energijo.
Therefore it is active in electricity generation and provides pressurised steam, water, nitrogen and compressed air.
Tako proizvaja električno energijo in dobavlja parni tlak, vodo, dušik in stisnjen zrak.
The plant comprises essentially two identical boilers for the production of superheated high pressure steam and two turbo alternators for the production of electrical energy and of process steam at two different pressure levels.
Elektrarno v glavnem sestavljajo dva enaka ogrevalna kotla za proizvodnjo vodne pare pri visokih temperaturah ter dve turbini za proizvodnjo električne energije in pare pri dveh različnih stopnjah tlaka.
In the electricity market Ottana Energia was active on the Borsa Elettrica selling on the MGP (Day before market) segment mainly at peak hours.
Na trgu električne energije je Ottana Energia prodajala na borzi z električno energijo v segmentu DT (dnevni trg) predvsem v času konic.
It has a capacity of 140 MW of which it sold an average of around 30 MW.
Družba Ottana Energia ima zmogljivost 140 MW, od katere je prodajala povprečno 30 MW.
The Commission understands that Ottana Energia’s market share is 5 % in terms of capacity and 4 % in terms of production the Sardinian electricity market.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je tržni delež družbe Ottana Energia 5 % zmogljivosti in 4 % proizvodnje na sardinskem trgu električne energije.
In 2005 Ottana Energia experienced financial difficulties resulting mainly from a shortage of funds to pay fuel oil.
Leta 2005 se je Ottana Energia znašla v finančnih težavah zlasti zaradi pomanjkanja sredstev za plačilo goriva.
Therefore, it was estimated that for the first half of 2006 about EUR 5 million were needed to keep the company afloat.
Tako je bilo izračunano, da je bilo v prvi polovici leta 2006 potrebnih približno 5 milijonov EUR za ohranitev dejavnosti družbe.
On 29 December 2005, Ottana Energia received a guarantee for a loan by the Ministry for Economic Development amounting to EUR 5 million. In August 2006, the Ministry later prolonged the same guarantee for a loan on the basis of a restructuring plan as restructuring aid.
Ottana Energia je 29. decembra 2005 prejela poroštvo Ministrstva za gospodarski razvoj za posojilo v višini 5 milijonov EUR. Avgusta leta 2006 je ministrstvo naknadno podaljšalo to poroštvo za posojilo, namenjeno pomoči za prestrukturiranje na podlagi načrta prestrukturiranja.
The Italian authorities indicated in the meantime that the loan would be reimbursed over five years as of 2009 until 2014 by EUR 1 million per annum.
Italijanski organi so medtem napovedali, da bo posojilo vrnjeno v petih letih, v obdobju od 2009 do 2014, po 1 milijon EUR na leto.
On 9 January 2007 it was approved.
Tedaj je bil načrt predložen v potrditev deželi Sardiniji in sindikatom ter potrjen 9. januarja 2007.
The approval comprises a commitment from the Sardinia region to endeavour to release the necessary authorisations for ‘step two’ as soon as possible.
Potrditev izraža prizadevanje dežele Sardinije za čim hitrejšo izdajo potrebnih pooblastil za „fazo 2“.
The plan is based on a feasibility study from Electrowatt-Econo-Poyry, a well known consultancy firm which explored several repowering options.
Načrt temelji na študiji izvedljivosti, ki jo je opravila znana družba za svetovanje Electrowatt-Eccono-Poyry, ki je proučila različne možnosti obnove (repowering).
Moreover it has in the meantime been supplemented by a market study.
Ta študija je bila medtem dopolnjena s tržno raziskavo.
The plan identifies as a main reason for failure its dependence on fuel oil and the inability to pass on price increases in fuel oil via the electricity price.
V načrtu sta kot glavni razlog težav družbe Ottana Energia navedeni njena odvisnost od kurilnega olja in nezmožnost prenosa zvišanja cene kurilnega olja na ceno električne energije.
Indeed the Sardinian Electricity reserve is made up of coal power plants which have lower costs than oil.
Sardinske rezerve električne energije namreč sestavljajo termoelektrarne na premog, ki obratujejo z nižjimi stroški od tistih na nafto.
Therefore Ottana Energia aims at reducing direct costs, particularly those connected to fuel and related transport charges.
Zato želi družba Ottana znižati neposredne stroške, predvsem tiste, ki so povezani s ceno goriva in prevoza.
The company prepared a conversion plan for the power plant.
Družba je pripravila načrt preusmeritve za elektrarno.
To this end, the Italian authorities provided the Commission with a perspective of the future development of the company which indicates two main restructuring steps, while a third step remains optional and will not neither be subjected to State aid nor to any financing indicated in the present restructuring plan.
Zaradi tega so italijanski organi Komisiji predložili razvojni načrt podjetja, v katerem sta opisani dve glavni fazi prestrukturiranja, medtem ko je tretja neobvezna in ne bo ne predmet državnih pomoči ne drugih oblik financiranja, opredeljenih v načrtu prestrukturiranja.
The Commission thus considers that the restructuring will concentrate on the first and second phase and that the restructuring period ends in 2014 when the aid is reimbursed.
Zato bo po mnenju Komisije prestrukturiranje osredotočeno na fazo 1 in fazo 2, končalo pa se bo leta 2014, ko bo pomoč že vrnjena.
Step one, which is currently ongoing is the re-powering of one boiler of the power plant to use of liquid coal (carbone fluido) while the other continues to run on fuel oil.
Faza 1, ki poteka, obsega obnovo enega ogrevalnega kotla elektrarne za uporabo utekočinjenega premoga, medtem ko bo drugi še naprej deloval na kurilno olje.
In addition an automatic control system has been constructed for electrical loads for enabling operation on the secondary regulation services market.
Poleg tega je bil izdelan sistem za samodejni nadzor električne obremenitve, ki omogoča delovanje na trgu storitev sekundarne regulacije.
Moreover also an inverse osmosis plant is foreseen.
Predvidena je tudi namestitev sodobnega sistema obratne osmoze.
With regard to the provision of electrical and thermal utilities, Ottana Energia has attempted to shift its own production to utilities with a higher added value.
Kar zadeva dobavo električne in toplotne energije, je Ottana Energia poskušala preusmeriti proizvodnjo na storitve z višjo dodano vrednostjo.
With regard to electricity generation, Ottana Energia has also shifted its own electricity production from day-ahead [6] to the balancing market [7], where the assets traded are services provided by the Ottana Energia electricity power station to the national transmission network manager to control the frequency and voltage of the network itself.
V okviru pridobivanja električne energije je družba Ottana Energia spremenila proizvodnjo s prenosom z dnevnega trga [6] na trg prednostnega dispečiranja [7], kjer poteka trgovanje s storitvami, ki jih elektrarna Ottana Energia dobavlja upravljavcu državnega prenosnega omrežja, da ta lahko nadzira frekvenco in napetost samega omrežja.
The balancing market is normally more profitable for electricity producers due to high concentration in the market and long term provisions on supply.
Trg prednostnega dispečiranja je za proizvajalce električne energije običajno donosnejši zaradi večje koncentracije in dolgoročnih pogodb o dobavi.
Step two concerns the conversion of the second generator from fuel oil to vegetable oil.
„Faza 2“ zajema preusmeritev drugega generatorja in nadomestitev kurilnega olja z rastlinskim.
In this way a reduction of the emissions is envisaged which can be utilised to acquire and sell ‘green certificates’.
S tem se namerava doseči zmanjšanje izpustov, ki se lahko uporabi za nakup in prodajo „zelenih certifikatov“.
This seems indispensable for the success of the plan so as to set off the higher prices of bio-fuels compared to fossil fuels, which can at least for the time being not be equalised by excise tax rebates as no authorisation to this respect has been obtained.
To je nujno za uspešno izvedbo načrta, saj bi tako pokrili višje cene biogoriv v primerjavi s fosilnimi gorivi, ki jih vsaj za zdaj še ni mogoče izenačiti s povračilom trošarin, saj v ta namen doslej niso prejeli še nobene odobritve.
The technical restructuring envisages installing new equipment in the power plant to enable electricity generation from vegetable oil.
Tehnično prestrukturiranje zajema namestitev nove naprave za pridobivanje električne energije na rastlinsko olje.
The EUR 8,5 million is made up of EUR 1,4 million from PC Holding and a EUR 7,1 million cash transfer from AE-EW.
Znesek v višini 8,5 milijona EUR sestavlja 1,4 milijona EUR iz družbe PC Holding in 7,1 milijona EUR iz gotovinskega prenosa iz družbe AE-EW.
PC Holding will thus have the 51 % share for about 10 % and Ottana Energia about 41 %.
Tako bo družba PC Holding nadzorovala družbo Biopower s svojim neposrednim 10-odstotnim deležem in 41-odstotno udeležbo družbe Ottana Energia.
The equity is equivalent to 25 % of the project total in conformity with the request of the financial institution.
Lastniškega kapitala je 25 % celotnega projekta v skladu z zahtevo ustanove, ki je zagotovila finančna sredstva.
The agreement with the Sardinia region and trade unions provides also for a reduction of 45 jobs.
V sporazumu z deželo Sardinijo in sindikati je predvidena tudi odprava 45 delovnih mest.
It is envisaged to take advantage of an ‘early retirement’ scheme.
Predvideno je predčasno upokojevanje.
Altogether the restructuring costs for phase 1 and 2 are as following:
Skupni stroški prestrukturiranja v fazah 1 in 2 so:
Table 1
Tabela
Overview restructuring costs
Pregled stroškov prestrukturiranja
Restructuring action
Dejavnosti prestrukturiranja
Estimated cost
Ocenjeni stroški
Modernisation of plant
Posodobitev elektrarne
Self-financed
Samofinanciranje
Severance pay
Zmanjšanje števila zaposlenih
Phase 1: Use of coal water
Faza 1 – uporaba utekočinjenega premoga
Phase 2: Vegetable-oil engines
Faza 2 – motorji na rastlinsko olje
25 % Equity, of which:
25 % lastniškega kapitala, od tega:
75 % Bank financing
75 % bančnih posojil
Italy submits that the 2 phase will have a very high internal rate of return (almost 25 %) and a significant net present value.
Italija trdi, da bo za fazo 2 značilna posebno visoka notranja donosnost (25 %) in visoka neto sedanja vrednost.
Moreover, as regards the prospects for viability the Italian authorities have updates their financial projections.
Poleg tega so italijanski organi posodobili svoje finančne napovedi glede pričakovanih donosov.