natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to a 29 September 2004 notification of the MP Government, companies or persons investing in new captive power plants of more than 10 KW capacity can obtain from the MP Electrical Inspectorate a certificate of exemption from electricity duty.
V skladu z obvestilom Vlade MP z dne 29. septembra 2004 lahko družbe ali osebe, ki vlagajo v nove elektrarne za lastno porabo energije z zmogljivostjo več kot 10 KW, od Inšpektorata za elektriko MP prejmejo potrdilo o oprostitvi dajatve za elektriko.
The exemption is only given for electricity generated for self-consumption, and only if the new captive power plant is not a replacement of an older one.
Oprostitev se odobri samo za elektriko, proizvedeno za lastno porabo in samo, če nova elektrarna za lastno porabo energije ni nadomestilo za staro.
The exemption is granted for a period of five years.
Oprostitev se odobri za pet let.
A notification from the MP Government dated of 5 April 2005 exempted the new power plant established by one of the cooperating exporting producers in this investigation from electricity duty for a period of 10 years.
Z obvestilom Vlade MP z dne 5. aprila 2005 je bila nova elektrarna, ki jo je ustanovil eden od proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz te preiskave, oproščena plačila dajatve za elektriko za deset let.
The cooperating exporter who was granted an exemption from electricity duty claimed that the EDE scheme is not specific, and is applied without discrimination to all eligible companies.
Sodelujoči izvoznik, ki mu je bila odobrena oprostitev dajatve za elektriko, je trdil, da shema EDE ni specifična in se uporablja brez diskriminacije za vse upravičene družbe.
According to that exporter, the initial policy of granting an exemption for five years was subsequently revised by the Government of Madhya Pradesh to confer an exemption for ten years.
Po mnenju navedenega izvoznika je vlada Madhja Pradeš naknadno pregledala prvotno politiko odobritve oprostitve za pet let, da bi dodelila oprostitev za deset let.
However, no published notification of such a policy change was submitted either by the cooperating exporter or by the GOI in their replies.
Vendar niti sodelujoči izvoznik niti vlada Indije v svojih odgovorih nista predložila nobenega uradnega obvestila o takšni spremembi politike.
Conclusion on EDE Scheme
Sklep o shemi EDE
It constitutes a financial contribution by the MP Government, since this incentive decreases the state revenues which would be otherwise due.
Pomeni finančni prispevek Vlade MP, ker ta spodbuda znižuje prihodke države, ki bi sicer zapadli v plačilo.
In addition, it confers a benefit upon the recipient company.
Poleg tega družbi prejemnici prinaša koristi.
Although the Industrial Promotion Policy of 2004 and the 29 September 2004 notification of the MP Government foresee a period of exemption of five years, the exporting producer in question was granted an exemption of ten years.
Čeprav politika spodbujanja industrije iz leta 2004 in obvestilo z dne 29. septembra 2004 Vlade MP predvidevata obdobje oprostitve pet let, je bila zadevnemu proizvajalcu izvozniku odobrena oprostitev za deset let.
Therefore, this incentive does not appear to be granted according to criteria and conditions clearly set out by law, regulation, or other official document.
Zato se zdi, da ta spodbuda ni bila odobrena v skladu z merili in pogoji, jasno določenimi z zakoni, predpisi ali drugimi uradnimi dokumenti.
In accordance with Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation, the amount of subsidy (numerator) has then been allocated over total sales during the review investigation period (denominator), because it relates to all sales, domestic and export, and it was not granted by reference to the quantities manufactured, produced, exported or transported.
V skladu s členom 7(2) osnovne uredbe je ta višina subvencije (števec) dodeljena na skupno prodajo v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom (imenovalec), ker se subvencija nanaša na celotno prodajo, domačo in izvozno, in ni bila dodeljena v sorazmerju z izdelanimi, proizvedenimi, izvoženimi ali prepeljanimi količinami.
A subsidy margin of 0,7 % was thus established for one company which received benefits under the EDE.
Za družbo, ki je bila deležna ugodnosti v okviru EDE, je bila ugotovljena stopnja subvencije v višini 0,7 %.
It is recalled that in Regulation (EC) No 1628/2004 the amount of countervailable subsidies, expressed ad valorem, was found to be 15,7 % and 7 % respectively for the two exporting producers cooperating with the present partial interim review.
Znano je, da je bil v Uredbi (ES) št. 1628/2004 znesek subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, izražen ad valorem, 15,7 % in 7 %, v tem zaporedju, za oba proizvajalca izvoznika, ki sodelujeta v tem delnem vmesnem pregledu.
During the present partial interim review the amounts of countervailing subsidies, expressed ad valorem, were found to be as listed hereunder:
Med tem delnim vmesnim pregledom so bili ugotovljeni zneski izravnalnih subvencij, izraženi ad valorem, kakor je navedeno v nadaljevanju:
In line with the provisions of Article 19 of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation and the grounds of this partial interim review stated under point 3 of the notice of initiation, it is established that the level of subsidisation with regard to the cooperating producers has changed and, therefore, the rate of countervailing duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1628/2004 has to be amended accordingly.
V skladu z določbami člena 19 osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe in razlogi za ta delni vmesni pregled iz točke 3 obvestila o začetku je ugotovljeno, da se je stopnja subvencioniranja za sodelujoča proizvajalca spremenila in je izravnalno dajatev, uvedeno z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1628/2004, zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The countervailing duty under review resulted from parallel anti-subsidy and anti-dumping investigations (the original investigations).
Pregledana izravnalna dajatev izhaja iz vzporednih protisubvencijskih in protidampinških preiskav („prvotne preiskave“).
According to Article 24(1) of the basic Regulation and Article 14(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Communities [5] the anti-dumping duties imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1629/2004, were adjusted to the extent that the subsidy amounts and the dumping margins arose from the same situation.
V skladu s členom 24(1) osnovne uredbe in členom 14(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropskih skupnosti [5], so bile protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 1629/2004, prilagojene tako, da so zneski subvencij in stopnje dampinga izhajali iz enakega izhodišča.
The subsidy schemes investigated and found to be countervailable in the current review proceeding, with the exception of EDE, constituted export subsidies within the meaning of Article 3(4)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Subvencijske sheme, ki so bile predmet raziskave in se je zanje ugotovilo, da so izravnalne v tem postopku pregleda, so, z izjemo EDE, pomenile izvozne subvencije v smislu člena 3(4)(a) osnovne uredbe.
It is therefore appropriate that the anti-dumping duty be readjusted to reflect the new levels of subsidisation found in the present review, as far as export subsidies are concerned.
Zato je primerno, da se protidampinška dajatev ponovno prilagodi, tako da bo, kar zadeva izvozne subvencije, odražala nove stopnje subvencioniranja, ugotovljene v tem pregledu.
Moreover, in accordance with Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation, the level of countervailing duties should not be higher than the injury elimination margin found in the original investigation.
Poleg tega v skladu s členom 15(1) osnovne uredbe raven izravnalnih dajatev ne sme biti višja od stopnje odprave škode, ugotovljene v prvotni preiskavi.
As in the original investigation, given that the level of cooperation was high (100 %) the residual subsidy margin was set at the level of the company with the highest individual margin.
Kakor v prvotni preiskavi, je bila preostala subvencijska stopnja glede na to, da je bila stopnja sodelovanja visoka (100 %), določena na ravni družbe z najvišjo individualno stopnjo.
Accordingly, the levels of countervailing and anti-dumping duties should be adjusted as follows:
V skladu s tem je treba stopnje izravnalnih in protidampinških dajatev prilagoditi:
Subsidy margin
Stopnja subvencije
All others
Vse ostale družbe
One cooperating exporter claimed that since the present partial interim review was limited to the level of subsidisation, the anti-dumping duties should not be modified.
En sodelujoči izvoznik je trdil, da se zaradi omejitve obstoječega delnega vmesnega pregleda na raven subvencioniranja protidampinške dajatve ne smejo spremeniti.
In this respect, it is recalled that the notice of initiation of the present review stated that ‘for those companies which are subject to both anti-dumping and countervailing measures, the anti-dumping measure may be adjusted accordingly should there be a change in the countervailing measure.’
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je bilo v obvestilu o začetku obstoječega pregleda navedeno, da „se za tiste družbe, ki so predmet protidampinških in izravnalnih ukrepov, protidampinški ukrep lahko ustrezno prilagodi, če se spremeni izravnalni ukrep“.
The change in the anti-dumping duties is not the result of any new findings concerning the level of dumping, but an automatic consequence of the fact that the original dumping margins had been adjusted to reflect the level of export subsidies found, and that the latter have now been revised.
Sprememba protidampinških dajatev ni rezultat nobenih novih ugotovitev, ki zadevajo stopnjo dampinga, ampak avtomatična posledica dejstva, da so bile prvotne stopnje dampinga prilagojene, tako da odražajo ugotovljeno stopnjo izvoznih subvencij, in da so bile slednje zdaj spremenjene.
Imports of the product concerned manufactured by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and shall be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga je izdelala druga družba, ki ni izrecno omenjena v operativnem delu te uredbe, vključno s subjekti, ki so povezani z izrecno omenjenimi, ne more uporabljati teh stopenj dajatev in zanj velja stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za „vse ostale družbe“.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual countervailing duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [6] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company's activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for instance, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo teh individualnih stopenj izravnalne dajatve družbe (npr. zaradi spremembe imena družbe ali zaradi ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov) je treba takoj vložiti pri Komisiji [6], skupaj z vsemi potrebnimi informacijami, zlasti o vsaki spremembi dejavnosti družbe na področju proizvodnje ter domače in izvozne prodaje, povezani na primer z omenjeno spremembo imena ali omenjeno spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov.
If appropriate, and after consultation of the Advisory Committee, the Commission is hereby empowered to amend the Regulation accordingly by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual duty rates,
Če je primerno, Komisija po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom uredbo ustrezno spremeni z dopolnitvijo seznama družb, ki so upravičene do individualnih stopenj dajatev –
Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1628/2004 shall be replaced by the following:
Člen 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1628/2004 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘The rate of the definitive countervailing duty applicable to the net free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, for products produced by the companies listed below shall be as follows:
Stopnja dokončne izravnalne dajatve na neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti, pred plačilom dajatev, za izdelke, ki jih izdelajo družbe, navedene v nadaljevanju:
Hindustan Electro Graphite (HEG) Limited, Bhilwara Towers, A-12, Sector- 1, Noida — 201301, Uttar Pradesh
Hindustan Electro Graphite (HEG) Limited, Bhilwara Towers, A-12, Sector-1, Noida – 201301, Uttar Pradesh
Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1629/2004 shall be replaced by the following:
Člen 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1629/2004 se nadomesti z naslednjim: „2.
‘The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, for products produced by the companies listed below shall be as follows:
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve na neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti, pred plačilom dajatev, za izdelke, ki jih izdelajo družbe, navedene v nadaljevanju:
Hindustan Electro Graphite (HEG) Limited, Bhilwara Towers, A-12, Sector — 1, Noida — 201301, Uttar Pradesh
Hindustan Electro Graphite (HEG) Limited, Bhilwara Towers, A-12, Sector-1, Noida – 201301, Utar Pradesh
OJ C 230, 2.10.2007, p. 9.
UL C 230, 2.10.2007, str. 9.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade, Directorate H, Office N-105 4/92, 1049 Brussels, Belgium.
Evropska Komisija, Generalni direktorat za trgovino, Direktorat H, Pisarna N-105 4/92, 1049 Bruselj, Belgija.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1355/2008
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1355/2008
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins, etc.) originating in the People’s Republic of China
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih pripravljenih ali konzerviranih agrumov (mandarin itd.) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the ‘basic Regulation’) and in particular Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 9 Uredbe,
On 20 October 2007 the Commission announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Community of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins, etc.) originating in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) [2].
Komisija je 20. oktobra 2007 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, napovedala začetek protidampinškega postopka glede uvoza nekaterih pripravljenih ali konzerviranih agrumov (mandarin itd.) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) [2] v Skupnost.
On 4 July 2008, the Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 642/2008 [3] (the ‘provisional Regulation’) imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits originating in the PRC.
Komisija je 4. julija 2008 z Uredbo (ES) št. 642/2008 [3] („začasna uredba“) uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih pripravljenih ali konzerviranih agrumov s poreklom iz LRK.
The proceeding was initiated as a result of a complaint lodged on 6 September 2007 by the Spanish National Federation of Associations of Processed Fruit and Vegetables (FNACV) (the complainant) on behalf of producers representing 100 % of the total Community production of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins etc.).
Postopek se je začel na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 6. septembra 2007 vložila španska Nacionalna zveza združenj za predelano sadje in zelenjavo (FNACV) („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo 100-odstotni delež celotne proizvodnje nekaterih pripravljenih ali konzerviranih agrumov (mandarin itd.) v Skupnosti.
The complaint contained evidence of dumping of the product concerned and of material injury resulting there from, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of a proceeding.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze o dampingu zadevnega proizvoda in o znatni škodi, ki je zaradi tega nastala, kar je zadostovalo, da se upraviči začetek postopka.
As set out in recital 12 of the provisional Regulation, the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 October 2006 to 30 September 2007 (IP).
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 12 začasne uredbe, je preiskava dampinga in škode zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2006 do 30. septembra 2007 („OP“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 October 2002 to the end of the investigation period (period considered).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2002 do konca obdobja preiskave („obravnavano obdobje“).
On 9 November 2007, the Commission made imports of the same product originating in the PRC subject to registration by Regulation (EC) No 1295/2007 [4].
Komisija je 9. novembra 2007 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1295/2007 [4] odredila registracijo za uvoz istega proizvoda s poreklom iz LRK.
It is recalled that safeguard measures were in force against the same product until 8 November 2007.
Spomniti je treba, da so za isti proizvod do 8. novembra 2007 veljali zaščitni ukrepi.
The Commission imposed provisional safeguard measures against imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins, etc.) by Regulation (EC) No 1964/2003 [5].
Komisija je z Uredbo (ES) št. 1964/2003 [5] uvedla začasne zaščitne ukrepe proti uvozu nekaterih pripravljenih ali konzerviranih agrumov (mandarin itd.).
Definitive safeguard measures followed by Regulation (EC) No 658/2004 (the ‘safeguard Regulation’) [6].
Dokončni zaščitni ukrepi so bili uvedeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 658/2004 („uredba o zaščitnih ukrepih“) [6].
Both the provisional and definitive safeguard measures consisted of a tariff rate quota i.e. a duty was only due once the volume of duty free imports had been exhausted.
Začasni in dokončni zaščitni ukrepi so bile tarifne kvote, kar pomeni, da je bilo dajatev treba plačati šele, ko je bil obseg dajatve prostega uvoza izčrpan.
Following the imposition of provisional anti-dumping duties on imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC; several interested parties submitted comments in writing.
Po uvedbi začasnih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz zadevnega proizvoda s poreklom iz LRK je več zainteresiranih strank predložilo pisne pripombe.
The Commission continued to seek and verify all information it deemed necessary for its definitive findings.
Komisija je še naprej zahtevala in preverjala vse informacije, za katere je menila, da so nujne za dokončne ugotovitve.
In particular, the Commission completed the investigation with regard to Community interest aspects.
Komisija je zaključila preiskavo v zvezi z vidiki interesa Skupnosti.
In this respect, verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following unrelated importers in the Community:
V zvezi s tem so bili izvedeni preveritveni obiski v prostorih naslednjih nepovezanih uvoznikov v Skupnosti:
Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft International (GmbH & Co KG), Hamburg, Germany,
Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft International (GmbH & Co KG), Hamburg, Nemčija,
Hüpeden & Co (GmbH & Co), Hamburg, Germany,
Hüpeden & Co (GmbH & Co), Hamburg, Nemčija,
(GmbH & Co), Hamburg, Germany,
(GmbH & Co), Hamburg, Nemčija,
Zumdieck GmbH, Paderborn, Germany,
Zumdieck GmbH, Paderborn, Nemčija,
Gaston spol. s r.o., Zlin, Czech Republic.
Gaston spol. s r.o., Zlin, Češka.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of the provisional duty.
Vse stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti uvedba dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz zadevnega proizvoda s poreklom iz LRK in dokončnega pobiranja zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo.
They were also granted a period of time within which they could make representations subsequent to this disclosure.
Za stranke se je določilo tudi obdobje, v katerem so lahko po tem razkritju navedle svoje pripombe.
Some importers proposed a joint meeting of all interested parties, pursuant to Article 6(6) of the basic Regulation; however the request was refused by one of them.
Nekateri uvozniki so v skladu s členom 6(6) osnovne uredbe predlagali skupno srečanje vseh zainteresiranih strank, vendar je eden od njih zahtevo zavrnil.
The oral and written comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and taken into account where appropriate.
Ustne in pisne pripombe, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane stranke, so bile ustrezno obravnavane in upoštevane.
Two unrelated EC importers argued that certain types of mandarins should be excluded from the definition of the product concerned either because of their sweetness level or because of their packing when exported.
Dva nepovezana uvoznika iz Skupnosti sta trdila, da je treba nekatere vrste mandarin izključiti iz opredelitve zadevnega proizvoda zaradi sladkosti ali embalaže za izvoz.
In this respect, it is noted that these claims were not accompanied with any type of verifiable information and data proving that these types have characteristics that differentiate them from the product concerned.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da tem trditvam niso bile priložene nikakršne preverljive informacije in podatki, ki bi dokazovali, da se te vrste zaradi svojih značilnosti razlikujejo od zadevnega proizvoda.
It is also noted that differences in packing cannot be considered as a critical element when defining product concerned, especially when formats of packing were already taken into account when defining the product concerned as set out in recital 16 of the provisional Regulation.
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da se drugačna embalaža ne more šteti za bistven element pri opredelitvi zadevnega proizvoda, zlasti ker so oblike embalaže že upoštevane pri opredelitvi zadevnega proizvoda iz uvodne izjave 16 začasne uredbe.
These arguments are therefore rejected.
Te utemeljitve se zato zavrnejo.
Two unrelated EC importers disputed that the Chinese exporting producers selected for the sample represented 60 % of the total exports to the Community.
Dva nepovezana uvoznika iz Skupnosti se nista strinjala, da kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, ki so bili izbrani za vzorec, predstavljajo 60 % celotnega izvoza v Skupnost.
Nevertheless, they were not able to provide any verifiable information that could undermine the accuracy of the sampling information submitted by the cooperating Chinese exporting producers and largely confirmed in the course of the further investigation.
Vendar nista predložila preverljivih informacij, s katerimi bi lahko ovrgla natančnost informacij za vzorčenje, ki so jih predložili sodelujoči kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki in so bile z nadaljnjo preiskavo večinoma potrjene.
Three Chinese cooperating exporting producers submitted representations claimed that their related companies were exporting producers of the product concerned and should therefore be included in the Annex of cooperating exporting producers.
Trije kitajski sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki so predložili pripombe in trdili, da so njihove povezane družbe proizvajalci izvozniki zadevnega proizvoda in bi zato morali biti vključeni v prilogo za sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike.
These claims were considered warranted and it was decided to revise the relevant Annex accordingly.
Te trditve so se štele za upravičene, zato je bilo odločeno, da se zadevna priloga ustrezno popravi.