natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In December 1999, by Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 [2], the Council imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film (the product concerned) falling within CN codes ex39206219 and ex39206290, originating in India.
Svet je decembra 1999 z Uredbo (ES) št. 2597/1999 [2] uvedel dokončno izravnalno dajatev na uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) („zadevni izdelek“), ki se uvršča pod oznaki KN ex39206219 in ex39206290, s poreklom iz Indije.
The measures took the form of an ad valorem countervailing duty, ranging between 3,8 % and 19,1 % imposed on imports from individually named exporters, with a residual duty rate of 19,1 % imposed on imports of the product concerned from all other companies.
Ukrepi v obliki izravnalne dajatve ad valorem v višini od 3,8 % do 19,1 % so bili uvedeni na uvoz poimensko navedenih izvoznikov, na uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz vseh drugih družb pa je bila uvedena stopnja preostale dajatve v višini 19,1 %.
The investigation period of the original investigation was 1 October 1997 to 30 September 1998.
Obdobje prvotne preiskave je trajalo od 1. oktobra 1997 do 30. septembra 1998.
In March 2006, by Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 [3], the Council, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation, maintained the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 on imports of PET film originating in India.
Svet je marca 2006 z Uredbo (ES) št. 367/2006 [3] po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe ohranil dokončno izravnalno dajatev, uvedeno z Uredbo (ES) št. 2597/1999 na uvoz folije iz PET s poreklom iz Indije.
In August 2006, by Regulation (EC) No 1288/2006 [4], the Council, following an interim review concerning the subsidisation of an Indian PET film producer, Garware Polyester Limited (Garware), amended the definitive countervailing duty imposed on Garware by Regulation (EC) No 367/2006.
Svet je po vmesnem pregledu glede subvencioniranja indijskega proizvajalca folije iz PET družbe Garware Polyester Limited („Garware“) avgusta 2006 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1288/2006 [4] spremenil dokončno izravnalno dajatev, uvedeno za Garware z Uredbo (ES) št. 367/2006.
In September 2007, by Regulation (EC) No 1124/2007 [5], the Council, following a partial interim review concerning the subsidisation of another Indian PET film producer, Jindal Poly Films, Limited, formerly known as Jindal Polyester Ltd, (Jindal), amended the definitive countervailing duty imposed on Jindal by Regulation (EC) No 367/2006.
Svet je po delnem vmesnem pregledu glede subvencioniranja drugega indijskega proizvajalca folije iz PET družbe Jindal Poly Films Limited, prej poznane kot Jindal Polyester Ltd (Jindal), septembra 2007 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1124/2007 [5] spremenil dokončno izravnalno dajatev, uvedeno za Jindal z Uredbo (ES) št. 367/2006.
Existing anti-dumping measures
Obstoječi protidampinški ukrepi
In August 2001, by Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 [6], the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating, inter alia, in India.
Svet je avgusta 2001 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1676/2001 [6] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz polietilentereftalatske (PET) folije s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije.
The measures consisted of an ad valorem anti-dumping duty ranging between 0 % and 62,6 % imposed on imports from individually named exporters, with a residual duty rate of 53,3 % on imports from all other companies.
Ti ukrepi so bili v obliki protidampinške dajatve ad valorem v višini od 0 % do 62,6 % uvedeni na uvoz poimensko navedenih izvoznikov, na uvoz vseh drugih družb pa je bila uvedena stopnja preostale dajatve v višini 53,3 %.
In March 2006, by Regulation (EC) No 366/2006 [7], the Council amended the level of dumping margins calculated by Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001.
Svet je marca 2006 z Uredbo (ES) št. 366/2006 [7] spremenil stopnjo dampinga, izračunanega v Uredbi (ES) št. 1676/2001.
The new dumping margins range between 3,2 % and 29,3 % and the new dumping duty range between 0 % and 18 % taking into account the countervailing duties resulting from export subsidies imposed on the same products originating in India, as modified according to Regulation (EC) No 367/2006, which was adopted following an expiry review of Regulation (EC) No 2579/1999 referred to in recital 1 above.
Nove stopnje dampinga znašajo med 3,2 % in 29,3 %, nova dampinška dajatev pa znaša med 0 % in 18 %, pri čemer se upoštevajo izravnalne dajatve zaradi izvoznih subvencij, uvedenih na enake izdelke s poreklom iz Indije, kakor so bile spremenjene v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 367/2006, ki je bila sprejeta po pregledu zaradi prenehanja veljavnosti Uredbe (ES) št. 2597/1999 iz zgornje uvodne izjave (1).
In August 2006, by Regulation (EC) No 1288/2006, the Council, following an interim review concerning the subsidisation of an Indian PET film producer, Garware Polyester Limited (Garware), amended the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on Garware by Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001.
Svet je po vmesnem pregledu glede subvencioniranja indijskega proizvajalca folije iz PET družbe Garware Polyester Limited („Garware“) avgusta 2006 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1288/2006 spremenil dokončno protidampinško dajatev, uvedeno za Garware z Uredbo (ES) št. 1676/2001.
In September 2006, by Regulation (EC) No 1424/2006 [8], the Council, following a new exporting producer request amended Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 in respect of SRF Limited.
Svet je na zahtevo novega proizvajalca izvoznika septembra 2006 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1424/2006 [8] spremenil Uredbo (ES) št. 1676/2001 v zvezi s SRF Limited.
The Regulation established a dumping margin of 15,5 % and a dumping duty rate of 3,5 % for the company concerned taking into account the company’s export subsidy margin as ascertained in the anti-subsidy investigation which led to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 referred to above.
Uredba je za zadevno družbo določila stopnjo dampinga v višini 15,5 % in stopnjo dampinške dajatve v višini 3,5 % ob upoštevanju stopnje izvozne subvencije družbe, kot je bilo ugotovljeno v protisubvencijski preiskavi, na podlagi katere je bila sprejeta navedena Uredba (ES) št. 367/2006.
Since the company did not have an individual countervailing duty, the rate established for all other companies was applied.
Ker za družbo ni veljala individualna izravnalna dajatev, se je uporabila stopnja, ki je bila določena za vse druge družbe.
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007 [9] imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [10] (the basic anti-dumping Regulation).
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 1292/2007 [9] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [10] (osnovna protidampinška uredba).
The same Regulation terminated a partial interim review of such imports limited to one India exporter pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation.
Ista uredba je zaključila delni vmesni pregled v zvezi s takim uvozom, omejen na enega indijskega izvoznika, v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne protidampinške uredbe.
Following the extension of the validity of the definitive countervailing duty in March 2006, the Government of India (GOI) made submissions that the circumstances with regard to two subsidy schemes (the Duty Entitlement Passbook Scheme and the Income Tax Exemption under Section 80 HHC of the Income Tax Act) had changed and that these changes were of a lasting nature.
Po podaljšanju veljavnosti dokončne izravnalne dajatve marca 2006 je indijska vlada („IV“) predložila stališča o tem, da so se okoliščine glede dveh subvencijskih shem (shema za preložitev plačila uvoznih dajatev („duty entitlement passbook scheme“) in oprostitev davka od dohodka v skladu z oddelkom 80 HHC Zakona o davku od dohodkov) spremenile in da so te spremembe trajne narave.
The Commission examined the evidence submitted by the GOI and considered it sufficient to justify the initiation of a review in accordance with the provisions of Article 19 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je preučila dokaze, ki jih je predložila IV, in ugotovila, da zadoščajo za utemeljitev začetka pregleda v skladu z določbami člena 19 osnovne uredbe.
After consultation of the Advisory Committee, the Commission initiated, by a Notice of Initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 12 October 2007 [11], an ex officio partial interim review limited to the level of subsidisation of the countervailing duty in force in respect of imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India.
Komisija je po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije12. oktobra 2007 [11], po uradni dolžnosti začela delni vmesni pregled, omejen na stopnjo subvencioniranja veljavne izravnalne dajatve glede uvoza folije iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije.
The purpose of the partial interim review investigation is to assess the need for the continuation, removal or amendment of the existing measures in respect of those companies which benefited from one or both subsidy schemes that had allegedly changed, where sufficient evidence was provided in line with the relevant provisions of the Notice of Initiation.
Namen preiskave v zvezi z delnim vmesnim pregledom je oceniti potrebo za nadaljevanje, odstranitev ali spremembo obstoječih ukrepov glede tistih družb, ki so imele ugodnosti od ene ali obeh domnevno spremenjenih shem subvencioniranja, kadar je bilo zagotovljenih dovolj dokazov v skladu z ustreznimi določbami obvestila o začetku.
The partial interim review investigation would also assess the need, depending on the review findings, to revise the measures applicable to other companies that cooperated in the investigation that set the level of the existing measures and/or the residual measure applicable for all other companies.
S preiskavo v zvezi z delnim vmesnim pregledom se oceni tudi potreba, odvisno od ugotovitev pregleda, po reviziji ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za druge družbe, sodelujoče v preiskavi, in ki določajo raven obstoječih ukrepov, in/ali preostale ukrepe, ki se uporabljajo za vse druge družbe.
The review was limited to the level of subsidisation of the companies listed in the Annex to the Notice of Initiation as well as to other exporters that were invited to make themselves known under the conditions and within the time limit set out in the Notice of Initiation.
Pregled je bil omejen na stopnjo subvencioniranja družb iz priloge k obvestilu o začetku in druge izvoznike, ki so bili pozvani, naj se javijo v skladu s pogoji in v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
The investigation of the level of subsidisation covered the period from 1 October 2006 to 30 September 2007 (‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava stopnje subvencioniranja je zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2006 do 30. septembra 2007 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
V. Parties concerned by the investigation
V. Stranke, ki jih zadeva preiskava
The Commission officially informed the GOI and those Indian exporting producers who cooperated in the previous investigation, were mentioned under Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 and were listed in the Annex to the Notice of Initiation of the partial interim review, that were found to benefit from any of the two allegedly changed subsidy schemes, as well as Du Pont Tejin Films, Luxembourg, Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Germany, Toray Plastics Europe, France and Nurell, Italy, which represent the overwhelming majority of Community PET film production (hereinafter the Community industry), of the initiation of the partial interim review investigation.
Komisija je o začetku preiskave v zvezi z delnim vmesnim pregledom uradno obvestila IV in tiste indijske proizvajalce izvoznike, ki so sodelovali v prejšnji preiskavi, so bili omenjeni v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 367/2006 in bili navedeni v prilogi k obvestilu o začetku delnega vmesnega pregleda, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da so imeli ugodnosti od katere koli od obeh domnevno spremenjenih shem subvencioniranja, ter Du Pont Tejin Films, Luksemburg, Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Nemčija, Toray Plastics Europe, Francija in Nurell, Italija, ki predstavljajo veliko večino proizvodnje folije iz PET Skupnosti (v nadaljnjem besedilu „industrija Skupnosti“).
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the Notice of Initiation.
Zainteresirane stranke so imele možnost pisno izraziti svoja stališča in v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku, zahtevati zaslišanje.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, exporting producers were requested, pursuant to Article 27 of the basic Regulation, to make themselves known within 15 days of the initiation of the partial interim review and to provide the Commission with the information requested in the Notice of Initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in, če je, izbrala vzorec, so bili proizvajalci izvozniki pozvani, da se v skladu s členom 27 osnovne uredbe javijo Komisiji v 15 dneh od začetka delnega vmesnega pregleda in ji zagotovijo informacije, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku.
After examination of the information submitted, given the number of exporting producers in India indicating their willingness to cooperate, it was decided that sampling was not necessary in this case.
Po preučitvi predloženih informacij in ob upoštevanju števila indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, pripravljenih sodelovati, je bilo sklenjeno, da vzorčenje v tem primeru ni bilo potrebno.
One company, SRF Limited, not listed in the Annex to the Notice of Initiation, made itself known and provided evidence that it fulfilled the eligibility provisions of the scope of the partial interim review investigation as those set out in point 4 of the Notice of Initiation.
Ena družba, SRF Limited, ki ni bila navedena v prilogi k obvestilu o začetku, se je javila in predložila dokaze, da je izpolnila določbe o upravičenosti glede obsega preiskave v zvezi z delnim vmesnim pregledom, kakor so določene v točki (4) obvestila o začetku.
Consequently this company was included in this review investigation.
Zato je bila ta družba vključena v preiskavo v zvezi s pregledom.
One company, Flex Industries Limited, subject to a countervailing duty (Regulation (EC) No 367/2006) and an anti-dumping duty (Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007) has changed its name and is now known as Uflex Limited.
Ena družba, Flex Industries Limited, za katero veljata izravnalna dajatev (Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 367/2006) in protidampinška dajatev (Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1292/2007), je spremenila ime in se zdaj imenuje Uflex Limited.
This change of name does not affect the findings of previous investigations.
Ta sprememba imena ne vpliva na ugotovitve prejšnjih preiskav.
In order to obtain the information necessary for its investigation, the Commission sent questionnaires to the exporting producers which fulfilled the conditions set out in the Notice of Initiation.
Za pridobitev informacij, potrebnih za njeno preiskavo, je Komisija poslala vprašalnike proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki so izpolnjevali pogoje iz obvestila o začetku.
In addition, a questionnaire was sent to the GOI.
Poleg tega je bil vprašalnik poslan IV.
Replies from the questionnaires were received from five Indian exporting producers, and from the GOI.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike je prejela od petih indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in IV.
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of GOI in Delhi, the Government of Maharashtra in Mumbai, the Reserve Bank of India in Mumbai, and the following companies:
Preveritveni obiski so bili opravljeni v prostorih IV v Delhiju, vlade Maharaštre v Bombaju, Indijske centralne banke v Bombaju in v naslednjih podjetjih:
The GOI and the other interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations upon which it was intended to propose to amend the duty rates applicable to the concerned cooperating Indian exporting producers and prolong existing measures for all other companies which did not cooperate with this partial interim review.
IV in druge zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravalo predlagati spremembe stopenj dajatev, ki se uporabljajo za zadevne sodelujoče indijske proizvajalce izvoznike, in podaljšati obstoječe ukrepe za vse druge družbe, ki niso sodelovale pri tem delnem vmesnem pregledu.
The product covered by this review is the same product as the one concerned by Regulation (EC) No 367/2006, namely polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film falling within CN codes ex39206219 and ex39206290 originating in India.
Izdelek, ki ga zajema ta pregled, je enak izdelek, kot ga zadeva Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 367/2006, in sicer folija iz polietilen tereftalata (PET), uvrščena pod oznaki KN ex39206219 in ex39206290 ter s poreklom iz Indije.
On the basis of the information submitted by the GOI and the cooperating Indian exporting producers and the replies to the Commission’s questionnaire, the following schemes, which allegedly involve the granting of subsidies, were investigated:
Na podlagi informacij, ki so jih predložili IV in sodelujoči indijski proizvajalci izvozniki, ter izpolnjenih vprašalnikov Komisije so bile preiskane naslednje sheme, ki domnevno vključujejo dodeljevanje subvencij:
Advance Authorisation Scheme (formerly known as Advance Licence Scheme);
shema vnaprejšnjih odobritev (Advance Authorization Scheme) (prej shema vnaprej pridobljenih dovoljenj – Advance Licence Scheme);
Special Economic Zones/Export Processing Zones/Export Oriented Units;
posebne ekonomske cone (Special Economic Zones)/proste carinske cone (Export Processing Zones)/izvozno usmerjeni obrati (Export Oriented Units);
Income Tax Exemption Scheme;
shema oprostitve davka od dohodka;
Export Credit Scheme;
shema izvoznih kreditov (Export Credit Scheme).
Package Scheme of Incentives (PSI).
Paketna shema spodbud (Package Scheme of Incentives – PSI)
One Export and Import Policy document is relevant to the RIP of this case, i.e. the five-year plan relating to the period 1 September 2004 to 31 March 2009 (EXIM-policy 04-09).
Za OPP tega primera je pomemben en dokument izvozne in uvozne politike, tj. petletni načrt za obdobje od 1. septembra 2004 do 31. marca 2009 („politika EXIM 2004–2009“).
In addition, the GOI also sets out the procedures governing the EXIM-policy 04-09 in a ‘Handbook of Procedures — 1 September 2004 to 31 March 2009, Volume I’ (HOP I 04-09).
Poleg tega IV določa postopke, ki urejajo politiko EXIM 2004–2009, tudi v „Priročniku o postopkih – 1. september 2004 do 31. marec 2009, Zvezek I“ („HOP I 2004–2009“).
The Income Tax Scheme specified above under (e) is based on the Income Tax Act of 1961, which is amended yearly by the Finance Act.
Shema davka od dohodka, navedena zgoraj v točki (e), temelji na Zakonu o davku od dohodkov iz leta 1961, ki ga letno spreminja Zakon o financah.
The scheme specified above under (g) is managed by State authorities in India.
Shemo, navedeno zgoraj v točki (g), upravljajo indijski državni organi.
In accordance with Article 11(10) of the basic Regulation, the Commission invited the GOI for additional consultations with respect to both changed and unchanged schemes with the aim of clarifying the factual situation as regards the alleged schemes and arriving at a mutually agreed solution.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 11(10) osnovne uredbe povabila IV k dodatnim posvetovanjem glede spremenjenih in nespremenjenih shem, da bi se pojasnil dejanski položaj v zvezi s temi shemami in dosegla sporazumna rešitev.
General disclosure comments on subsidisation
Splošne pripombe na razkritje o subvencioniranju
Following disclosure, the GOI and one exporting producer argued that it has not been determined that the schemes investigated confer a benefit to the recipient.
Po razkritju sta IV in eden od proizvajalcev izvoznikov trdila, da ni bilo ugotovljeno, da prejemniki od preiskovanih shem uživajo ugodnosti.
In addressing this claim, it should be noted that for each scheme under investigation, it was established whether any concession is a subsidy within the meaning of Article 2(1)(a) and Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, i.e. a financial contribution of the GOI which conferred a benefit upon the investigated exporting producers.
Pri obravnavi tega zahtevka je treba poudariti, da je bilo za vsako preiskovano shemo določeno, ali je koncesija v smislu člena 2(1)(a) in člena 2(2) osnovne uredbe subvencija, tj. finančni prispevek IV, katerega ugodnosti so uživali preiskovani proizvajalci izvozniki.
Moreover, it has been explained why benefits under the various schemes are considered countervailable.
Poleg tega je bilo pojasnjeno, zakaj se za ugodnosti v nekaterih shemah lahko izvedejo izravnalni ukrepi.
In addition, all cooperating exporting producers have received a detailed calculation sheet explaining how the benefits were established under each scheme.
Hkrati pa so vsi sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki prejeli podroben izračun, ki navaja, kako so bile ugodnosti določene v vsaki shemi.
Consequently, this claim has to be rejected.
Zato se ta zahtevek zavrne.
The detailed description of the scheme is contained in paragraphs 4.1.1 to 4.1.14 of the EXIM-policy 04-09 and chapters 4.1 to 4.30 of the HOP I 04-09.
Shema je podrobno opisana v odstavkih od 4.1.1 do 4.1.14 politike EXIM 2004–2009 in poglavjih od 4.1 do 4.30 priročnika HOP I 2004–2009.
This scheme was called Advance Licence Scheme during the previous review investigation that led to the imposition by Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 of the definitive countervailing duty currently in force.
Ta shema se je med prejšnjo preiskavo v zvezi s pregledom, ki je pripeljala do trenutno veljavne dokončne izravnalne dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 367/2006, imenovala shema vnaprej pridobljenih dovoljenj.
The AAS consists of six sub-schemes, as described in more detail in recital 35.
Shemo AAS sestavlja šest podshem, kakor je podrobneje opisano uvodni izjavi (35).
Main contractors which supply to the ‘deemed export’ categories mentioned in paragraph 8.2 of the EXIM-policy 04-09, such as suppliers of an export oriented unit (EOU), are eligible for AAS deemed export.
Glavni izvajalci, ki dobavljajo za kategorije „predvidenega izvoza“, omenjene v odstavku 8.2 politike EXIM 2004–2009, kot so dobavitelji za izvozno usmerjeno enoto („EOU“), so upravičeni do AAS za predvideni izvoz.
Physical exports: This is the main sub-scheme.
fizični izvoz: to je glavna podshema.
It allows for duty-free import of input materials for the production of a specific resulting export product.
Omogoča dajatev prost uvoz vhodnih materialov za proizvodnjo določenega nastalega izvoznega izdelka.
An import allowance and export obligation including the type of export product are specified in the licence;
Nadomestilo za uvoz in obveznost izvoza, vključno z vrsto izvoznega izdelka, sta določena v dovoljenju;
Annual requirement: Such an authorisation is not linked to a specific export product, but to a wider product group (e.g. chemical and allied products).
letno potrebo: taka odobritev ni vezana na določen izvozni izdelek, temveč na širšo skupino izdelkov (npr. kemični in sorodni izdelki).
It can choose to export any resulting product falling under the product group using such duty-exempt material;
Če uporablja surovine, ki so oproščene dajatev, se lahko odloči za izvoz katerega koli izdelka, ki spada v takšno skupino izdelkov;