natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court has consistently held that, where the area of social protection is based on solidarity, it does not constitute an economic activity within the meaning of the Treaty (see paragraph 67 of the decision to initiate the procedure of 10 October 2007) [51].
V skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso Sodišča področje socialne varnosti, kadar temelji na solidarnosti, ni gospodarska dejavnost v smislu Pogodbe (glej točko 67 odločbe o sprožitvi postopka z dne 10. oktobra 2007) [51].
In the light of this case law, the Commission considers that neither the CRP-RATP nor the pension funds serving current and retired RATP employees, i.e. CNAV and AGIRC-ARRCO, are undertakings within the meaning of Community competition law for the following reasons.
Komisija glede na to sodno prakso meni, da niti CRP-RATP niti pokojninski skladi, ki sprejemajo zaposlene in upokojene uslužbence RATP, to je CNAV in AGIRC-ARRCO, niso podjetja v smislu konkurenčnega prava Skupnosti, in sicer iz naslednjih razlogov.
In the present case, the Commission observes firstly that RATP staff are subject to mandatory social protection including an independent old-age pension scheme which pursues a social objective.
Komisija v tej zadevi najprej ugotavlja, da so uslužbenci RATP predmet obveznega socialnega varstva, ki vključuje neodvisen sistem starostnega zavarovanja s socialnim ciljem.
It is intended to provide cover for all the persons to whom it applies against the risks of old age, regardless of their financial status and their state of health at the time of affiliation.
Njegov namen je namreč vsem osebam, ki spadajo v ta sistem, zagotoviti starostno zavarovanje ne glede na njihovo premoženje ali zdravstveno stanje ob sklenitvi zavarovanja.
The Commission further considers that this scheme embodies the principle of solidarity in as much as the contributions paid by active workers finance the pensions of retired workers.
Komisija poleg tega meni, da ta sistem upošteva načelo solidarnosti, saj se s prispevki, ki jih plačujejo zaposleni delavci, financirajo pokojnine upokojenih delavcev.
The Commission also notes that the management of the scheme in question is entrusted under law to the CRP-RATP, the operation of which is subject to State supervision.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je upravljanje zadevnega sistema z zakonom dodeljeno CRP-RATP, katerega dejavnost nadzira država.
In this capacity, it collects the contributions receivable from RATP employees and from RATP itself and is responsible for the calculation and payment of pensions.
Zato država pokriva prihodek od prispevkov, ki jih plačujejo uslužbenci RATP in RATP, ter zagotavlja obračun in izplačilo pokojnin.
The Commission observes that, in accordance with Article L711-1 of the Social Security Code, the CRP-RATP has all the characteristics defined in Article L 111-1 of the said Code, which states, in particular, that the organisation of social security is to be founded on the basis of national solidarity.
Komisija opozarja, da ima CRP-RATP v skladu s členom L.711-1 zakonika o socialni varnosti vse pristojnosti, opredeljene v členu L.111-1 tega zakonika, v katerem je posebej določeno, da organizacija socialne varnosti temelji na načelu nacionalne solidarnosti.
The Commission observes finally that, in the execution of its remit, the CRP-RATP applies the law and cannot influence the amount of the contributions, the use of assets or the fixing of the level of benefits.
Komisija nazadnje ugotavlja, da CRP-RATP pri izvajanju svoje naloge upošteva zakon in nima nobene možnosti vplivati na znesek prispevkov, uporabo sredstev ali določitev višine dajatev.
The benefits paid are statutory benefits which bear no relation to the amount of the contributions.
Izplačane dajatve so zakonsko določene dajatve, ki so neodvisne od zneska prispevkov.
In so far as the CRP-RATP does not constitute an undertaking within the meaning of Community competition law, the Commission considers that the payment by the State of a balancing subsidy to the CRP-RATP and the funding by the State of cash payments in place of the CRP-RATP do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty,
Ker CRP-RATP ni podjetje v smislu konkurenčnega prava Skupnosti, Komisija meni, da državno nakazovanje izravnalnih subvencij CRP-RATP in državno financiranje doplačil namesto CRP-RATP nista državna pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES –
The creation of the pension fund for RATP staff (CRP-RATP) constitutes State aid in accordance with Article 87(1) of the Treaty, granted illegally by France contrary to Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
Ustanovitev Caisse de retraites du personnel de la RATP (CRP-RATP) je državna pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe, ki jo je Francija nezakonito odobrila v nasprotju s členom 88(3) Pogodbe.
This State aid is compatible with the common market under Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty, subject to the full implementation of the reform of the RATP special pension scheme, the objective of which is to bring the scheme into line with the statutory regulations governing the basic schemes of private sector employees and civil servants.
Ta državna pomoč je združljiva s skupnim trgom v smislu člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe, če se bo v celoti izvedla reforma posebnega pokojninskega sistema RATP, katere namen je uskladiti ta sistem s pravili splošnega prava, ki veljajo za osnovne sisteme zaposlenih v zasebnem sektorju in državne uslužbence.
Implementation of the aid is accordingly authorised.
Izvajanje te pomoči se zato odobri.
The payment by the State of a balancing subsidy to the CRP-RATP and the financing by the State of cash payments in place of the CRP-RATP for the affiliation of the basic rights of the special scheme to the statutory schemes do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Državno nakazovanje izravnalnih subvencij CRP-RATP in državno financiranje doplačil namesto CRP-RATP pri naslonitvi osnovnih dajatev iz posebnega sistema na sisteme splošnega prava nista državna pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
OJ C 9, 15.1.2008, p. 13.
UL C 9, 15.1.2008, str. 13.
Journal Officiel de la République française, 26 March and 3 April 1948.
Uradni list Francoske republike z dne 26. marca in 3. aprila 1948.
Article 2 of the amended Order No 59-151 of 7 January 1959 on the organisation of passenger transport in the Paris region (Journal Officiel de la République française, 10 January 1959), which amended the 1948 Law referred to above.
Člen 2 spremenjenega sklepa št. 59-151 z dne 7. januarja 1959 o organizaciji prevoza potnikov v pariški regiji (Uradni list Francoske republike z dne 10. januarja 1959), s katerim je bil spremenjen zgoraj navedeni zakon iz leta 1948.
This is made possible by legislation, subject to the following conditions: ‘Outside of Ile-de-France and abroad, RATP may also, via its subsidiaries, construct, develop and operate public networks and transport lines for travellers, subject to competition rules being complied with on a reciprocal basis. These subsidiaries shall have the status of a limited company. Their financial management will be independent within the framework of the objectives of the group: they may not benefit from aid allocated by the State, the Ile-de-France transport syndicate and other public organisations as regards the operation of and investment in transport in the Ile-de-France region’.
V zakonodaji so za to možnost določeni naslednji pogoji: „Régie autonome des transports parisiens lahko tudi zunaj regije Ile-de-France in v tujini prek hčerinskih družb gradi, ureja in uporablja omrežja in proge javnega potniškega prevoza ob vzajemnem upoštevanju pravil o konkurenci. Te hčerinske družbe imajo status delniške družbe. Njihovo upravljanje je finančno neodvisno v okviru ciljev skupine; predvsem ne morejo prejemati subvencij od države, združenja Syndicat des transport d’Ile-de-France in drugih javnih organov za delovanje prevoza v regiji Ile-de-France in vlaganje v ta prevoz.“
The RATP staff regulations define the principles for classifying staff and the provisions relating to certain situations, the main ones being:termination of employment, which stipulates the rules to be applied in the event of resignation, redundancy or dismissal,leave (annual leave, special leave for family reasons, etc.),promotion.Prior to the reform of the special pension scheme, the RATP staff regulations also provided (in Article 51 thereof), the conditions for retirement, with reference to the pensions regulation.
V kadrovskih predpisih RATP so opredeljena načela za razvrstitev zaposlenih, vsebujejo pa tudi določbe o nekaterih položajih, med katerimi so glavni naslednji:prenehanje delovnega razmerja, ki določa pravila, ki se uporabijo v primeru odstopa, odpusta ali odstranitve z delovnega mesta,dopusti (letni dopusti, posebni družinski dopusti …),pravila za napredovanje.Pred reformo posebnega pokojninskega sistema so bili v členu 51 kadrovskih predpisov RATP določeni tudi pogoji za upokojitev, ob upoštevanju uredbe o pokojninah.
The pensions regulation was repealed as of 1 July 2008 (Article 52 of French Decree No 2008-637 of 30 June 2008).
Ta člen je bil razveljavljen 1. julija 2008 (člen 52 odloka št. 2008-637 z dne 30. junija 2008).
Journal officiel de la République française, 10 January 1959.
Uradni list Francoske republike z dne 10. januarja 1959.
Journal officiel de la République française, 24 September 1959.
Uradni list Francoske republike z dne 24. septembra 1959.
Law No 2003-775 of 21 August 2003 reforming pension schemes.
Zakon št. 2003-775 z dne 21. avgusta 2003 o reformi pokojnin.
Decree No 2008-48 of 15 January 2008 regarding the special pension scheme for RATP staff.
Odlok št. 2008-48 z dne 15. januarja 2008 o posebnem pokojninskem sistemu za uslužbence Régie autonome des transports parisiens.
Decree No 2008-637 of 30 June 2008 regulating the pension scheme for RATP staff.
Odlok št. 2008-637 z dne 30. junija 2008 o uredbi o pokojninah za uslužbence Régie autonome des transports parisiens.
Decree No 2008-1514 of 30 December 2008 regarding certain special social security schemes and the pension scheme supplementing Social Security for non-statutory employees of the State and public bodies.
Odlok št. 2008-1514 z dne 30. decembra 2008 o nekaterih posebnih sistemih socialne varnosti in dopolnilnem pokojninskem sistemu socialnih zavarovanj za začasne uslužbence države in javnih organov.
A pay-as-you-go pension scheme is financed on the basis of significant solidarity between generations.
Financiranje dokladnega pokojninskega sistema temelji na veliki solidarnosti med generacijami.
Its financial equilibrium is dependent on the ratio between the number of contributors and the number of pensioners.
Njegovo finančno ravnovesje je odvisno od razmerja med številoma zavarovancev in upokojencev.
The rates by which revenue and the active employed population increase therefore constitute the two main factors in its development.
Stopnji rasti prihodkov in zaposlenega aktivnega prebivalstva sta zato glavna dejavnika sprememb.
Decree No 2005-1635 of 26 December 2005 regarding the pension fund for RATP staff.
Odlok št. 2005-1635 z dne 26. decembra 2005 o pokojninskem skladu za uslužbence Régie autonome des transports parisiens.
Decree No 2005-1638 of 26 December 2005 setting the rates of contributions payable to the pension fund for RATP staff.
Odlok št. 2005-1638 z dne 26. decembra 2005 o določitvi stopenj prispevkov v pokojninski sklad za uslužbence Régie autonome des transports parisiens.
CNAV: Caisse Nationale d'Assurance Vieillesse (National Old-Age Pension Fund).
CNAV: Caisse Nationale d’Assurance Vieillesse (nacionalni sklad starostnega zavarovanja).
AGIRC: Association générale des institutions de retraite des cadres (General association of pension institutions for managers).
AGIRC: Association générale des institutions de retraite des cadres (Splošno združenje pokojninskih ustanov za vodstvene delavce).
ARRCO: Association pour le régime de retraite complémentaire des salariés (Association for the supplementary retirement scheme for salaried employees).
ARRCO: Association pour le régime de retraite complémentaire des salariés (Združenje za dopolnilni pokojninski sistem za zaposlene).
The financial affiliation maintains the special scheme and its rules.
Finančna naslonitev ohranja posebni sistem in njegova pravila taka, kot so.
Its objective is remove pension commitments from the budgets of the companies concerned by the transaction.
Cilj je izločiti pokojninske obveznosti iz bilance podjetij, ki jih ta transakcija zadeva.
Unlike inclusion, under affiliation there is no direct link with statutory schemes and the companies, employees and pensioners from the affiliated group.
Naslonitev v nasprotju z vključitvijo izključuje vse neposredne povezave med sistemi splošnega prava ter podjetji, zaposlenimi in upokojenci v naslonjeni skupini.
A ‘screen’ structure set up between the companies and the employees from the affiliated sector on the one hand and the statutory schemes on the other makes it possible to ensure that the affiliation process only regulates global financial flows, based on ‘virtual’ transactions.
Prek „navidezne“ strukture, vzpostavljene med podjetji in zaposlenimi v naslonjenem sektorju na eni strani ter sistemi splošnega prava na drugi strani, se pri naslonitvi izvajajo samo splošni finančni tokovi, ki temeljijo na „virtualnih“ transakcijah.
These are virtual, in so far as staff have no legal or administrative connection with the receiving scheme’s institutions and also in so far as the regulation of the special scheme continues to be the only one used for establishing their pension entitlements and revaluing paid pensions.
Te so virtualne, ker zaposleni niso niti pravno niti upravno neposredno povezani z ustanovami sprejemnega sistema in ker zanje še naprej veljajo samo predpisi o posebnem sistemu za določitev njihovih pokojninskih pravic in prevrednotenje izplačanih pokojnin.
The entitlements specific to the special scheme or ‘special’ entitlements correspond to no more than the difference between the pension entitlements acquired under the RATP special scheme and the portion and corresponding to the benefits provided by statutory provisions or basic rights.
Dajatve iz posebnega sistema ali „posebne“ dajatve po strukturi ustrezajo razliki med pridobljenimi pokojninskimi dajatvami, izplačanimi iz posebnega sistema RATP, in deležem, ki ustreza dajatvam, izplačanim po splošnem pravu, ali osnovnim dajatvam.
The ‘special’ entitlements to the RATP special scheme therefore correspond to the pension rights which are greater than the rights usually provided on a statutory basis.
„Posebne“ dajatve iz posebnega sistema RATP torej ustrezajo pokojninskim dajatvam, ki presegajo dajatve, ki se običajno izplačajo iz sistemov splošnega prava.
The entitlements specific to the special scheme, or which also will have to be gradually removed in accordance with the reform of special pension schemes (see recital 21 of this Decision) will continue to be the responsibility of the CRP-RATP.
Dajatve iz posebnega sistema, ki naj bi se sicer postopoma odpravile v okviru reforme posebnih pokojninskih sistemov (glej uvodno izjavo 21 te odločbe), bo še naprej kril CRP-RATP.
The difference between the cost ratio under the two schemes depends on differences in the level and structure of pay (which has an impact on pension costs) and also demographic differences (for example, a basis of contribution which is proportionally more limited will have an impact on the amount of contributions).
Razlike med razmerji obveznosti obeh sistemov so odvisne po eni strani od različne ravni in strukture osebnih prejemkov (ki vplivajo na pokojninske obveznosti) in po drugi strani od demografskih razlik (na primer sorazmerno manjša baza zavarovancev, ki vpliva na znesek prispevkov).
This information is confidential.
Informacija, za katero velja poslovna skrivnost.
Court of Justice judgment in Case C-251/97 France v Commission [1999] ECR I-6639.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 5. oktobra 1999 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji, C-251/97, Recueil, str. I-6639, točka 40.
Court of First Instance judgment in Case T-157/01, Danske Busvognmaend v Commission [2004] ECR II-917.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 16. marca 2004 v zadevi Danske Busvognmaend proti Komisiji, T-157/01, Recueil, str. II-917.
Court of Justice judgment in Case C-237/04, Enirisorse SpA v SotaCRP-RATPbo SpA [2006] ECR I-2843.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 23. marca 2006 v zadevi Enirisorse SpA proti SotaCRP-RATPbo SpA, C-237/04, ZOdl., str. I-2843.
According to the information report presented by Mr Bertrand Auban, Senator, on behalf of the French national committee for finance, budgetary monitoring and economic accounts on 9 July 2008, these pension commitments are assessed at EUR 21 billion.
Glede na informativno poročilo senatorja Bertranda Aubana v imenu odbora za finance, proračunski nadzor in računovodske evidence z dne 9. julija 2008 so te pokojninske obveznosti ocenjene na 21 milijard EUR.
Commission Decision 2008/204/EC of 10 October 2007 on the State aid implemented by France in connection with the reform of the arrangements for financing the retirement pensions of civil servants working for La Poste (OJ L 63, 7.3.2008, p. 16).
Odločba Komisije 2008/204/ES z dne 10. oktobra 2007 o državni pomoči Francije v zvezi z reformo financiranja pokojnin državnih uslužbencev, zaposlenih pri La Poste (UL L 63, 7.3.2008, str. 16).
Case C-301/87 France v Commission [1990] ECR I-307, paragraph 41.
Sodba z dne 14. februarja 1990 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji, C-301/87, Recueil, str. I-307, točka 41.
See to this effect Case T-55/99 Spain v Commission [2000] ECR II-3207, paragraph 82.
Glej v tem smislu sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 20. septembra 2000 v zadevi Španija proti Komisiji, T-55/99, Recueil, str. II-3207, točka 82.
See in this context Decision 2008/204/EC mentioned above and the Commission Decision of 10 October 2007 regarding the reform of the financing arrangements for retirement pensions in the banking sector in Greece (OJ C 308, 19.12.2007, p. 9).
Glej v tem smislu zgoraj navedeno Odločbo 2008/204/ES in Odločbo Komisije z dne 10. oktobra 2007 o reformi financiranja pokojninskega sistema v bančnem sektorju v Grčiji (UL C 308, 19.12.2007, str. 9).
See in this context the decisions referred to in the footnote 6.
Glej v tem smislu odločbi, navedeni v opombi 6.
See in particular parts 2 and 3 of this decision.
Glej zlasti oddelka 2 in 3 te odločbe.
Case C-34/01 Enirisorse SpA v Ministero delle Finanze [2003] ECR I-14243.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 27. novembra 2003 v Zadevi Enirisorse SpA proti Ministero delle Finanze, C-34/01, Recueil, str. I-14243.
See paragraph 63 of the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (OJ C 244, 1.10.2004, p. 2).
Glej točko 63 Smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah (UL C 244, 1.10.2004, str. 2).
Case T-157/01, Danske Busvognmænd v Commission, ECR II-917.
Sodba z dne 16. marca 2004 v zadevi Danske Busvognmænd proti Komisiji, T-157/01, Recueil, str. II-917.
Case 173/73 Italy v Commission [1974] ECR 709, paragraph 13; Case 310/85 Deufil v Commission [1987] ECR 901, paragraph 8; Case C-241/94 France v Commission ECR I-4551, paragraph 20.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 2. julija 1974 v zadevi Italija proti Komisiji, 173/73, Recueil, str. 709, točka 13; sodba Sodišča z dne 24. februarja 1987 v zadevi Deufil proti Komisiji, C-310/85, Recueil, str. 901, točka 8; sodba Sodišča z dne 26. septembra 1996 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji, C-241/94, Recueil, str. I-4551, točka 20.
C-387/92 Banco Exterior [1994] ECR I-877, paragraph 13; aforementioned judgment in Case C-241/94, paragraph 34.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 15. marca 1994 v zadevi Banco Exterior, C-387/92, Recueil, str. I-877, točka 13; zgoraj navedena sodba v zadevi C-241/94, točka 34.
Case C-5/01 Belgium v Commission [2002] ECR I-1191, paragraph 39.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 12. decembra 2002 v zadevi Belgija proti Komisiji, C-5/01, Recueil, str. I-1191, točka 39.
Case 30/59 Gezamenlijke Steenkolenmijnen in Limburg v High Authority [1961] ECR 3, paragraphs 29 and 30; aforementioned judgment in Case C-173/73, paragraphs 12 and 13; aforementioned judgment in Case C-241/94, paragraphs 29 and 35; Case C-251/97 France v Commission [1999] ECR I-6639, paragraphs 40, 46 and 47.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 23. februarja 1961 v zadevi Gezamenlijke Steenkolenmijnen in Limburg proti Visoki oblasti, 30/59, Recueil, str. 3, točki 29 in 30; sodba, navedena v zadevi C-173/73, točki 12 in 13; sodba, navedena v zadevi C-241/94, točki 29 in 35; sodba Sodišča z dne 5. oktobra 1999 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji, C-251/97, Recueil, str. I-6639, točke 40, 46 in 47.
See Case C-156/98 Germany v Commission [2000] ECR I-6857, paragraph 30, and the case law cited therein.
Glej sodbo z dne 19. septembra 2000 v zadevi Nemčija proti Komisiji, C-156/98, Recueil, str. I-6857, točka 30, in navedeno sodno prakso.
See, for example, Case 730/79 Philip Morris v Commission ECR 2671, paragraphs 11 and 12; and Case T-214/95 Vlaams Gewest v Commission [1998] ECR II-717, paragraphs 48-50.
Glej predvsem sodbo Sodišča z dne 17. septembra 1980 v zadevi Philip Morris proti Komisiji, C-730/79, Recueil, str. 2671, točki 11 in 12 in sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 30. aprila 1998 v zadevi Vlaams Gewest proti Komisiji, T-214/95, Recueil, str. II-717, točke od 48 do 50).
Case T-222/04 Alitalia v Commission [2009], paragraph 45.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 11. junija 2009 v zadevi Italija proti Komisiji, T-222/04, točka 45.
Where a Member State grants aid to an undertaking, domestic production may for that reason be maintained or increased with the result that undertakings established in other Member States have less chance of entering the market in that Member State.
Ko država članica dodeli pomoč podjetju, se lahko dejansko ohranja ali spodbuja domača dejavnost, kar podjetjem s sedežem v drugih državah članicah zmanjšuje možnosti, da vstopijo na trg te države članice.
Moreover, the strengthening of an undertaking which, until then, did not take part in intra-Community trade may enable it to enter the market of another Member State (see to this effect, in particular, Case C-310/99 Italy v Commission [2002] ECR I-2289, paragraph 84).
Poleg tega lahko krepitev podjetja, ki do zdaj ni bilo udeleženo v trgovini znotraj Skupnosti, ustvari položaj, ko je temu podjetju omogočen vstop na trg druge države članice (v zvezi s tem glej zlasti sodbo z dne 7. marca 2002 v zadevi Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil, str. I-2289, točka 84).
See recital 21 of the present decision.
Glej uvodno izjavo 21 te odločbe.
See to this effect the joint Council and Commission report on adequate and sustainable pensions (CS/7165/03), 18 March 2003.
Glej v tem smislu Skupno poročilo Komisije in Sveta o sprejemljivih in primernih pokojninah (CS/7165/03) z dne 18. marca 2003.
Commission communication relating to the methodology for analysing State aid linked to stranded costs, (Commission letter SG (2001) D/290869 of 6.8.2001).
Sporočilo Komisije o metodologiji za analizo državne pomoči v zvezi z nasedlimi stroški (dopis Komisije SG (2001) D/290869 z dne 6. avgusta 2001).