natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As indicated in recitals 41 to 43 of the provisional Regulation a request for individual examination (IE) pursuant to Article 17(3) of the basic Regulation by one exporting producer could not be accepted at the provisional stage as it would have prevented the timely completion of the investigation at that stage.
Kakor je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 41 do 43 začasne uredbe, zahteve enega proizvajalca izvoznika za individualno preiskavo („IP“) v skladu s členom 17(3) osnovne uredbe v začasni fazi ni bilo mogoče sprejeti, saj bi to onemogočilo, da se preiskava pravočasno konča.
However, in the circumstances of the case, it was considered administratively possible to satisfy this sole substantiated request after the imposition of the provisional measures.
Vendar glede na okoliščine primera je bilo upravno mogoče zadovoljiti to edino utemeljeno zahtevo po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov.
Therefore, a verification visit was carried out at the premises of the following company in the PRC:
Zato je bil opravljen preveritveni obisk v prostorih naslednje družbe v LRK:
Moreover, verification visits were carried out to its following related importers in the Community:
Poleg tega sta bila opravljena preveritvena obiska v naslednjih z njo povezanih družbah v Skupnosti:
Müller Fabryka Świec S.A., Grudziądz, Poland
Müller Fabryka Świec S.A., Grudziądz, Poljska
Müller Kerzenfabrik AG, Straelen, Germany
Müller Kerzenfabrik AG, Straelen, Nemčija
Subsequent to the provisional disclosure, the company to which Article 18 of the basic Regulation was applied contested the Commission findings.
Družba, za katero se je uporabil člen 18 osnovne uredbe, je po začasnem razkritju spodbijala ugotovitve Komisije.
It essentially reiterated its claims made at the provisional stage without providing any substantiated evidence that could justify changes to the provisional findings.
V glavnem je ponovila svoje trditve iz začasne faze, ne da bi predložila utemeljene dokaze, ki bi lahko upravičili spremembe začasnih ugotovitev.
In view of the above, recitals 44 to 47 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Glede na navedeno se uvodne izjave 44 do 47 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Following the provisional disclosure, five Chinese exporting producers which were not granted MET contested the provisional findings.
Po začasnem razkritju je pet kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki jim TGO ni bila odobrena, spodbijalo začasne ugotovitve.
In the case of the exporter that could not demonstrate that it met criteria 1 and 3 set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, it was submitted that criterion 1 of that provision would be fulfilled since a financial contribution received from the State to construct for instance a technology centre by a small and medium size company would also be available in market economy countries.
V primeru izvoznika, ki ni mogel dokazati, da izpolnjuje merili 1 in 3 člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, je bilo zatrjeno, da naj bi bilo merilo 1 iz te določbe izpolnjeno, ker bi tudi v državah s tržnim gospodarstvom bil na voljo finančni prispevek države malemu in srednje velikemu podjetju (MSP) za gradnjo na primer tehnološkega centra.
It also claimed that in another anti-dumping case, subsidies received by another company did not deprive the company of its MET status.
Ta izvoznik je prav tako trdil, da v drugem protidampinškem primeru prejete subvencije druge družbe niso prikrajšale njenega statusa TGO.
With regard to the first claim it has to be noted that the Community institutions conduct the MET assessment on the basis of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation rather than on general comparisons of market conditions of companies operating in the PRC and firms operating in market economy countries.
Glede prve trditve je treba opomniti, da institucije Skupnosti opravijo oceno TGO na osnovi člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe in ne na osnovi splošnih primerjav tržnih razmer družb, ki delujejo v LRK in podjetij v državah s tržnim gospodarstvom.
With regard to the second claim, it has to be underlined that the investigation of each anti-dumping case is conducted separately and that the conclusions of each investigation are drawn in the context and circumstances of the particular case.
Glede druge trditve je treba poudariti, da se preiskava za vsak protidampinški primer izvaja ločeno in se ugotovitveni sklepi vsake preiskave sprejmejo glede na posamezen primer in njegove okoliščine.
Furthermore, the nature, the frequency and the economic environment in which the State contributions were given in the present case showed that criterion 1 of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation was not fulfilled.
Poleg tega so narava, pogostost in gospodarsko okolje dodeljenih prispevkov države, v tem primeru pokazali, da merilo 1 iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne Uredbe ni bilo izpolnjeno.
Therefore the argument had to be rejected.
Trditev je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
The same exporter claimed that in relation to criterion 3 of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation all relevant documents provided would have demonstrated that the price paid for the land use rights would have been the result of a free negotiation with the local authorities and therefore, the price would be based on market values.
Isti izvoznik je trdil, da naj bi v zvezi z merilom 3 člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe vsi ustrezni predloženi dokumenti pokazali, da je bila plačana cena za pravico do rabe zemljišča določena s svobodnimi pogajanji z lokalnimi organi in zato temelji na tržni vrednosti.
In this regard it has to be noted that the relevant documents on which the purchase price of the land use rights were based date back to 1997 and enabled this exporter to acquire these rights for an indefinite period of time at a price fixed at that date.
Glede tega je treba navesti, da so ustrezni dokumenti, na katerih je temeljila nakupna cena za pravico do rabe zemljišča, iz leta 1997 in da so izvozniku omogočili pridobitev teh pravic za neomejeno obdobje za takrat določeno ceno.
By not taking into account any price increase between 1997 and the date of the actual transfer of the land use rights and in the absence of any land appraisal or evaluation report, this exporter could not explain on what basis the transfer price for the land use rights was established.
Brez upoštevanja povišanja cene med letom 1997 in datumom dejanskega prenosa pravice do rabe zemljišča ter brez vsakršne cenitve zemljišča ali poročila o oceni ta izvoznik ne bi mogel pojasniti, kako je bila določena cena prenosa pravice do rabe zemljišča.
From the above it is concluded that for this exporter neither criteria 1 nor 3 of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation are met and that therefore the conclusions reached at the provisional stage have to be confirmed.
Na podlagi navedenega se sklene, da ta izvoznik ni izpolnil meril 1 in 3 člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe in je zato treba potrditi sklepne ugotovitve iz začasne faze.
One exporter that did not meet criterion 2 of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, claimed that it did meet that criterion since the financial contributions given to two members of the management should not be considered as ‘loans’ contrary to what was established at the provisional stage (recital 53 of the provisional Regulation).
En izvoznik, ki ni izpolnjeval merila 2 člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, je trdil, da je to merilo izpolnil, saj se finančni prispevki, dodeljeni dvema članoma uprave, ne morejo šteti za „posojila“, kot je bilo to ugotovljeno v začasni fazi (uvodna izjava 53 začasne uredbe).
Rather, these contributions, it claimed, should be regarded as reserve funds.
Te prispevke je treba raje razumeti kot sredstva rezervnega sklada.
In this regard it should be noted that a reserve fund is a type of account on a balance sheet that is reserved for long-term capital investment projects or any other large and anticipated expenses that will be incurred in the future.
Glede tega je treba opozoriti, da je rezervni sklad vrsta postavke na bilanci stanja, ki je rezervirana za investicijske projekte z dolgoročnim kapitalom ali katere koli druge velike in pričakovane stroške, ki se bodo pojavili v prihodnosti.
Once recorded on the balance sheet, these funds are only to be spent on the capital expenditure projects for which they were initially intended, excluding any unforeseen circumstances.
Sredstva iz tega sklada, ko so enkrat navedena v bilanci stanja, se lahko porabijo samo za projekte naložb v kapital, za kar so bila na začetku namenjena, kar pa ne vključuje nepredvidenih okoliščin.
From the minutes of the Board of Directors meeting it is clear that such purposes were not intended.
Iz zapisnika seje članov uprave je jasno, da takšni nameni niso bili načrtovani.
Moreover, the respective entries have been booked in the balance sheet under ‘other receivables’ which is normally used for short-term owner and employee loans and advances.
Poleg tega se je zadevni vnos v postavki bilance zavedel kot „druge terjatve“, kar se ponavadi uporablja za kratkoročna posojila in predujme lastnikov in zaposlenih.
Therefore it can be concluded that the financial means provided to two individuals were not destined to serve as capital reserve, but to provide money without any proper legal basis, in particular without a contract specifying any dates of repayments or interests incurred.
Zato se lahko sklene, da finančna sredstva, dana posameznikoma, niso bila namenjena za kapitalsko rezervo, ampak pomenijo dajanje denarja brez vsakršne primerne pravne podlage, zlasti brez pogodbe, ki bi določala datume poplačil ali nastalih obresti.
In any event such a transaction has to be considered as a financial instrument within the meaning of international accounting standard (IAS) 32.
V vsakem primeru se takšna transakcija šteje kot finančni instrument v smislu mednarodnih računovodskih standardov (MRS) 32.
Moreover, the disclosure of these transactions was not made in accordance with IAS 24, as the financial statements of the company did not disclose (i) the amount of transactions, (ii) their terms and conditions, including whether they are secured, and (iii) the nature of the consideration to be provided in the settlement and details of any guarantees given or received.
Poleg tega te transakcije niso bile razkrite v skladu z MRS 24, saj finančni izkazi družbe niso razkrili (i) zneska transakcij, (ii) njihovih pogojev, vključno s tem, ali so zavarovani, ter (iii) narave vsakega nadomestila pri poravnavi in podrobnosti o vseh izdanih ali prejetih jamstvih.
From the above it is concluded that this exporter failed to meet criterion 2 of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation and therefore the conclusions reached at the provisional stage are hereby confirmed.
Na podlagi navedenega se sklene, da ta proizvajalec izvoznik ni izpolnil merila 2 člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe in je zato treba potrditi ugotovitve iz začasne faze.
The other exporter that did not meet the requirements of criterion 2 of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation did not contest the fact that errors in its accounting books took place, but considered that some were of minor importance and that others that took place in previous years did not affect the clarity of the company’s accounts.
Drugi izvoznik, ki ni izpolnil zahtev iz merila 2 iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, ni izpodbijal dejstva o napakah v njegovih računovodskih knjigah, vendar so se mu nekatere napake zdele manj pomembne in nekatere druge iz lanskega leta brez vpliva na jasnost računovodskih izkazov družbe.
In this regard it should be noted that the mistakes were found on randomly selected bookkeeping documents and were not mentioned by the auditors in the audit report which casts serious doubts as to whether the whole accounting records were audited in line with IAS.
Glede tega je treba opomniti, da so bile napake odkrite v naključno izbranih računovodskih dokumentih in jih revizorji v revizijskem poročilu, v katerem so resno podvomili o tem, da je računovodska evidenca pregledana v skladu z MRS, niso navedli.
In addition, the erroneous booking of fixed assets in previous years continues to distort the cost structure of the company and cannot be considered as being in line with IAS 1 and 38.
Poleg tega napačno knjiženje osnovnih sredstev v prejšnjem letu še naprej izkrivlja strukturo stroškov družbe in se ne more šteti za skladno z MRS 1 in 38.
Consequently, the determination made at the provisional stage that this exporting producer did not meet criterion 2 of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Posledično se določitev iz začasne faze, da ta proizvajalec izvoznik ni izpolnil merila 2 iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, potrdi.
The cooperating exporter whose MET claim was rejected because it could not demonstrate that it met criterion 1 of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, provided a written confirmation issued by Chinese local authorities which, according to the exporter, proved that the company was not subject to any restrictions in its purchasing and selling activities.
Sodelujoči izvoznik, katerega zahtevek za TGO je bil zavrnjen, ker ni mogel dokazati, da je izpolnil merilo 1 iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, je predložil pisno potrdilo kitajskih lokalnih organov, ki je po besedah izvoznika dokazovalo, da družba nima omejitev pri svojih nabavnih in prodajnih dejavnosti.
However, since the confirmation provided is in contradiction with the Articles of Association (AoA) of this particular exporting producer and the evidence provided could no longer be verified, the MET claim has also to be rejected at the definitive stage.
Ker pa je predloženo potrdilo v nasprotju s statutom tega posameznega proizvajalca izvoznika in predloženih dokazov ni bilo več mogoče preveriti, je bilo treba zahtevek za TGO zavrniti tudi v dokončni fazi.
The cooperating exporter for which it was established that it did not meet criteria 1 to 3 of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, claimed regarding criterion 1 of that provision that the purchasing and selling restrictions in its AoA were not followed by the company in practice.
Sodelujoči izvoznik, za katerega je bilo ugotovljeno, da ni izpolnil meril 1 do 3 iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, je v zvezi z merilom 1 iz navedene določbe trdil, da omejitev nabavnih in prodajnih dejavnosti v njegovem statutu družba v praksi ni upoštevala.
Regarding criterion 2 of that provision, it did not contest the findings but claimed that the accounting errors of the company were due to incorrect practices of its accountants and/or instructions from the local tax authorities.
Glede merila 2 iz navedene določbe ugotovitev ni izpodbijal, trdil pa je, da so računovodske napake družbe posledica nepravilnih praks njegovih računovodij in/ali navodil lokalnih davčnih organov.
Regarding criterion 3 of that provision, while the company provided certain explanations concerning the discount received by the State which was considered as an improper evaluation of land use rights, it did not submit any evidence that it met the conditions for the discount.
Glede merila 3 iz navedene določbe pa družba, medtem ko je predložila nekaj pojasnil v zvezi s prejetimi državnimi popusti, ki so se štela za neustrezno ocenitev pravice do uporabe zemljišč, ni predložila dokazov o izpolnitvi pogojev za popust.
With regard to criterion 1 of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, it is noted that Chinese Company Law provides that the AoA of companies are binding on the company, shareholders, directors, supervisors and senior management and, therefore, the comments of the company were rejected.
V zvezi z merilom 1 iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe je treba navesti, da so v skladu s kitajskim pogodbenim pravom statuti družb zavezujoči za družbo, delničarje, direktorje, nadzornike in vodstveno osebje, zato so bile pripombe družbe zavrnjene.
Moreover, with regard to criteria 2 and 3 of that provision, the comments of the company could not justify a change of the relevant provisional findings.
Poleg tega pripombe družbe glede meril 2 in 3 iz navedene določbe ne bi mogle upravičiti sprememb ustreznih začasnih ugotovitev.
Therefore, recital 54 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Zato se uvodna izjava 54 začasne uredbe potrdi.
In relation to recital 57 of the provisional Regulation, it is noted that the analysis of the information received after the disclosure of MET findings does not justify any change in the determination of the companies that were granted MET.
V zvezi z uvodno izjavo 57 začasne uredbe je treba navesti, da analiza prejetih informacij po razkritju ugotovitev v zvezi s TGO ne upravičuje različne določitve družb, ki jim je bil dodeljen TGO.
The company to which IE was granted demonstrated that it fulfilled the criteria of Article 2(7)(c) and could, therefore, be granted MET.
Družba, ki ji je bila odobrena IO, je dokazala, da izpolnjuje merila iz člena 2(7)(c), in se ji tako lahko dodeli TGO.
One interested party claimed that anti-competitive practices and State interference would encourage circumvention of the measures and therefore none of the Chinese producers should be granted IT.
Ena od zainteresiranih strank je trdila, da protikonkurenčne prakse in vmešavanje države spodbujajo izogibanje ukrepom in zato nobenemu izmed kitajskih proizvajalcev ne bi smeli odobriti IO.
In this regard it is noted that this party did not provide any substantiated evidence with regard to its claim.
Glede tega je treba opozoriti, da ta stranka ni predložila nobenega utemeljenega dokaza, povezanega z njeno trditvijo.
However, in order to minimise the risks of circumvention due to the significant difference in duty rates, it is considered that special measures are needed in this case to ensure the proper application of the anti-dumping duties (see recitals 149 and 150).
Vendar se za manjšo nevarnost za izogibanje ukrepom zaradi znatne razlike v stopnjah dajatve šteje, da so v tem primeru potrebni posebni ukrepi za zagotovitev ustrezne uporabe protidampinških dajatev (glej uvodni izjavi 149 in 150).
In the absence of any other comments with regard to IT, recitals 58 to 60 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z IO ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 58 do 60 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
For the company in the PRC to which IE and subsequently MET was granted (the ‘IE company’) it was established that it had no sales on the domestic market.
Za družbo v LRK, ki ji je bila odobrena IO in nato še TGO („družba IO“), je bilo ugotovljeno, da ni prodajala na notranjem trgu.
Therefore, normal value for this company was constructed in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation by applying the same methodology for cooperating exporters without representative domestic sales as described in recitals 67 to 69 of the provisional Regulation.
Zato je bila normalna vrednost za to družbo oblikovana v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe z isto metodologijo kot za sodelujoče izvoznike brez reprezentativne domače prodaje, kakor je opredeljeno v uvodnih izjavah 67 do 69 začasne uredbe.
In the absence of any other comments with regard to normal value for exporters granted MET, recitals 61 to 69 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb k normalni vrednosti za izvoznike, ki jim je bila odobrena TGO, se uvodne izjave 61 do 69 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Certain parties contested the choice of the Community industry as an analogue country mainly due to the fact that there are differences in the labour markets and thus in labour cost.
Nekatere stranke so izpodbijale odločitev, da je bila za primerljivo državo izbrana industrija Skupnosti, zlasti zaradi razlik med trgi dela in s tem v stroških dela.
As explained in detail in recitals 70 to 76 of the provisional Regulation, considerable efforts were exerted in order to obtain cooperation from an analogue country.
Kakor je podrobno pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 70 do 76 začasne uredbe, je bilo vloženega precej truda za ohranitev sodelovanja primerljive države.
Given the absence of cooperation, it was considered that the data available for the Community industry could be used for the purpose of establishing normal value in a market economy country.
Glede na pomanjkljivo sodelovanje se je zdelo primerno razpoložljive podatke za industrijo Skupnosti uporabiti za določitev normalne vrednosti v državi s tržnim gospodarstvom.
The argument concerning differences in the labour market is not relevant in the context of the data in the analogue country.
Trditev glede razlik na trgu dela ni v zvezi s podatki v primerljivi državi.
Moreover, the arguments and remarks by these parties were provided without any substantiation or any concrete alternative proposals regarding the choice of the analogue country.
Poleg tega so bile trditve in pripombe teh strank predložene brez vseh utemeljitev in dejanskih alternativnih predlogov za izbiro primerljive države.
Hence, these comments had to be disregarded and the provisional findings can be confirmed.
Torej se te pripombe ne smejo upoštevati, začasne ugotovitve pa se potrdijo.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the analogue country, recitals 70 to 76 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb k primerljivi državi, se uvodne izjave 70 do 76 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
As the IE company was making its export sales to the Community through related companies located in the Community, sales export prices were established on the basis of the resale prices to the first independent customers in the Community, pursuant to Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Ker je družba IO v Skupnost izvažala po povezanih družbah s sedežem v Skupnosti, so bile izvozne cene določene na podlagi cen pri nadaljnji prodaji prvim neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti, v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
In the absence of any comments concerning the export price, which would alter the provisional findings, recitals 77 and 78 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb k izvozni ceni, ki bi spremenile začasne ugotovitve, se uvodni izjavi 77 in 78 začasne uredbe potrdita.
For the IE company the adjustments as described in recitals 81 to 83 of the provisional Regulation were made for the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Za družbo IO je bila izvedena prilagoditev iz uvodnih izjav 81 do 83 začasne uredbe, da se je zagotovila poštena primerjava med izvozno ceno in normalno vrednostjo v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
One exporting producer requested a currency conversion adjustment to its export price in accordance with Article 2(10)(j) of the basic Regulation.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je zahteval prilagoditev preračuna valut njegovi izvozni ceni v skladu s členom 2(10)(j) osnovne uredbe.
It quantified this adjustment as the net exchange losses (resulting as the difference from its exchange gains and losses) incurred during the IP for its export sales of the product concerned to the Community.
Prilagoditev je količinsko opredelil kot neto izgube zaradi tečajnih razlik (rezultat pozitivnih in negativnih tečajnih razlik), ki so se pojavile med OP pri njegovi izvozni prodaji zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost.
However, since this exporter failed to substantiate that there was a sustained movement in exchange rates during the IP, the claim had to be disregarded.
Ker pa izvoznik ni dokazal pomembnejših premikov menjalnih tečajev med OP, se zahteva ni smela upoštevati.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the comparison, which would alter the provisional findings, recitals 79 to 83 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb k primerjavi, ki bi spremenile začasne ugotovitve, se uvodni izjavi 79 do 83 začasne uredbe potrdita.
Subsequent to the provisional disclosure, certain exporting producers which were granted IT claimed that according to Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, all their export transactions should have been used to establish their dumping margin.
Po začasnem razkritju so nekateri proizvajalci izvozniki, ki jim je bila odobrena IO, trdili, da bi bilo v skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe treba za določitev njihove stopnje dampinga vključiti vse njihove izvozne transakcije.