natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Romania submitted documentation showing that the incompatible privatisation aid of EUR 27 million [24] and accruing interest was reimbursed by Ford Motor Company on 27 June 2008.
Romunija je predložila dokumentacijo z dokazi, da je družba Ford Motor Company 27. junija 2008 vrnila nezdružljivo pomoč za privatizacijo v višini 27 milijonov EUR [24] in pripadajoče obresti.
As a consequence, Romania considers that the notified aid is in compliance with the so-called Deggendorf principle.
Zato Romunija meni, da je priglašena pomoč skladna s tako imenovanim načelom Deggendorf.
Ford emphasises that a considerable part of this comprehensive training programme is financed from own resources – up to EUR 128,5 million of the estimated total cost of EUR 185,5 million for the entire project. Moreover, training that is either legally required and/or necessary for the operation of the plant has not been declared eligible for aid, and will be entirely financed by the company.
Družba Ford poudarja, da se precejšen del tega celovitega programa usposabljanja financira iz njenih sredstev, in sicer do 128,5 milijona EUR od ocenjenih skupnih stroškov za celotni projekt v višini 185,5 milijona EUR. Poleg tega usposabljanje, ki je zakonsko zahtevano in/ali nujno za obratovanje tovarne, ni bilo razglašeno kot upravičeno do pomoči in ga bo v celoti financirala družba.
Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 on Training Aid [33] was replaced by the GBER [34] twenty days after its publication on 9 August 2009.
Uredbo (ES) št. 68/2001 o pomoči za usposabljanje [33] je zamenjala Uredba o splošnih skupinskih izjemah [34] dvajset dni po njeni objavi 9. avgusta 2009.
Pursuant to recitals 29 and 32 and Article 6(1)(g) of the GBER, individual training aid exceeding EUR 2 million per project, irrespective of whether granted ad hoc or under a scheme, should be individually assessed by the Commission, according to the criteria resulting from the applicable Union instruments.
Skladno z uvodnima izjavama 29 in 32 ter členom 6(1)(g) Uredbe o splošnih skupinskih izjemah mora Komisija individualno pomoč za usposabljanje, ki presega 2 milijona EUR na projekt, ne glede na to, ali je dodeljena ad hoc ali v okviru sheme, oceniti individualno na podlagi meril iz veljavnih instrumentov Unije.
The Commission therefore concludes that Romania and Ford have shown to a satisfactory level that the skills conveyed by the additional general training should be valuable for the employees beyond their current job, possibly in other future occupations, in their social life, or for their well-being – in the sense of Point 9.2.(d) in the 2009 Training Aid Communication.
Zato Komisija ugotavlja, da sta Romunija in družba Ford zadovoljivo dokazali, da morajo biti znanja, pridobljena z dodatnim splošnim usposabljanjem, za delavce koristna tudi zunaj njihovega trenutnega delovnega mesta, tj. morda na prihodnjih delovnih mestih, v njihovem družbenem življenju ali za njihovo blaginjo, v smislu točke 9.2(d) sporočila o pomoči za usposabljanje iz leta 2009.
This finding is reinforced by the evidence submitted by Ford and Romania (see recital 16 above) to show that a good part of the trainers involved in the programme (up to 90 %) will be external trainers from specialised training centres, and that a considerable part of the training will be offered outside the premises of the factory (see also in this sense eligible travel expenses for both trainers and trainees at recital 18 of the Decision).
To ugotovitev podpirajo dokazi, ki sta jih predložili družba Ford in Romunija (glej uvodno izjavo 16 zgoraj), da bo večina vodij usposabljanja, vključenih v program (do 90 %), najetih iz zunanjih specializiranih izobraževalnih središč ter da se bo znaten delež usposabljanj zagotavljal zunaj prostorov tovarne (v zvezi s tem glej tudi upravičene potne stroške vodij in udeležencev usposabljanj v uvodni izjavi 18 tega sklepa).
Furthermore, Ford submitted detailed estimates of training costs, budgets, participants, content and scheduling for the proposed training programme at the Craiova plant, and sufficient equivalent information on the training programme which had been offered at the Saint Petersburg plant – elements which must be verified by the Commission under Point 15(a) of the 2009 Training Aid Communication.
Poleg tega je družba Ford predložila podrobne ocene stroškov usposabljanja, proračunov, udeležencev, vsebine in časovnega razporeda za predlagani program usposabljanja v tovarni v Craiovi ter zadostne enakovredne informacije o programu usposabljanja, ki je bil zagotovljen v tovarni v Saint Petersburgu, pri čemer mora njihove elemente Komisija preveriti na podlagi točke 15(a) sporočila o pomoči za usposabljanje iz leta 2009.
The company also submitted extensive evidence making it possible to distinguish between courses which are obligatory to give under the existing EU and/or Romanian regulation — in the sense of Point 15(b) of the 2009 Training Aid Communication.
Družba je predložila tudi podrobne dokaze, na podlagi katerih je mogoče razlikovati med programi, ki so obvezni na podlagi veljavnih predpisov EU in/ali romunskih predpisov – v smislu točke 15(b) sporočila o pomoči za usposabljanje iz leta 2009.
The costs budgeted for the additional, ‘eligible’ part of the training programme are credible by comparison to the costs allocated for the company-specific (non-eligible) part of the training programme, which was already started in Summer 2009.
Stroški za dodatni „upravičeni“ del programa usposabljanja so upravičeni v primerjavi s stroški za del programa usposabljanja za namene družbe (torej neupravičen) in se je začel izvajati že poleti 2009.
Thus the criterion laid down at Point 15(c) of the 2009 Training Aid Communication is also considered to be met.
Zato se šteje, da je izpolnjeno tudi merilo iz točke 15(c) sporočila o pomoči za usposabljanje iz leta 2009.
However, the considerations made above concerning the necessity of the training offered under this block for the beneficiary mitigate this concern, and make it possible to conclude that the relationship between the Industrial Skills training and the beneficiary’s activity is not of a nature to indicate lack of incentive effect within the meaning of Point 15(d) of the 2009 Training Aid Communication.
Vendar zgornje ugotovitve glede nujnosti usposabljanja, zagotovljenega v okviru tega sklopa, za upravičenca odpravljajo te pomisleke in omogočajo ugotovitev, da odnos med usposabljanjem na področju industrijskih spretnosti in dejavnostjo prejemnika pomoči ne kaže na odsotnost spodbujevalnega učinka v smislu točke 15(d) sporočila o pomoči za usposabljanje iz leta 2009.
This finding is reinforced by the fact that Romania and Ford provided evidence indicating that a good part of the training will be offered outside the premises of the factory itself, and by external trainers recruited from specialised external training centres (see recitals 16 and 76 above).
To ugotovitev potrjuje, da sta Romunija in družba Ford zagotovili dokaze, ki kažejo, da se bo pomemben del usposabljanja zagotavljal zunaj prostorov tovarne in ga bodo opravljali zunanje vodje usposabljanja, najeti pri specializiranih zunanjih izobraževalnih središčih (glej uvodni izjavi 16 in 76 zgoraj).
At the same time, the Commission notes that Romania and the beneficiary have not submitted evidence to substantiate that the beneficiary will not include in the eligible costs those costs that might eventually be recovered by the beneficiary as a consequence of benefiting from the skills acquired by the employees though training — as required by Point 16, last paragraph (with accompanying footnote 1) of the 2009 Training Aid Guidelines.
Komisija hkrati ugotavlja, da Romunija in upravičenec nista predložila dokazov za utemeljitev, da upravičenec med upravičene stroške ne bo vključil stroškov, ki bi se upravičencu lahko sčasoma povrnili zaradi koristi znanj, ki jih delavci pridobijo med usposabljanjem – kot je določeno v zadnjem odstavku točke 16 (in povezani opombi št. 1) smernic o pomoči za usposabljanje iz leta 2009.
The Commission nevertheless acknowledges that such effects might be difficult to quantify and demonstrate ex ante in the particular circumstances of the training programme proposed in this case, where a large part of the additional training proposed is of a general nature, which in principle benefits the beneficiary only indirectly, and the very nature and content of the training proposed excludes the hypothesis that it could be conducted in the context of the current tasks or jobs performed by the employees.
Komisija vseeno priznava, da je lahko take vplive zapleteno količinsko opredeliti in naknadno dokazati v posebnih okoliščinah programa usposabljanja, predlaganega v tem primeru, pri katerem je velik delež predlaganega dodatnega usposabljanja splošen, kar upravičencu načeloma koristi le posredno, pri čemer same lastnosti in vsebina predlaganega usposabljanja izključujejo predpostavko, da bi ga bilo mogoče opravljati v okviru sedanjih nalog ali poklicev delavcev.
The categories of eligible costs claimed by Romania for the additional ‘eligible’ part of the training programme (see recital 18 above) fulfil the conditions of Article 39(4) in the GBER and therefore of Point 16 in the 2009 Training Aid Communication.
Kategorije upravičenih stroškov, ki jih je Romunija priglasila za dodatni „upravičeni“ del programa usposabljanja (glej uvodno izjavo 18 zgoraj), izpolnjujejo pogoje iz člena 39(4) Uredbe o splošnih skupinskih izjemah in torej pogoje iz točke 16 Sporočila o pomoči za usposabljanje iz leta 2009.
In particular, Romania and the beneficiary submitted separate cost estimates for the company-specific (non-eligible), and respectively the ‘eligible’ general and specific parts of the training programme, distinguishing in the latter case between the following categories: trainers’ personnel costs; trainers and trainees’ travel expenses (including accommodation); depreciation of tools and equipment used exclusively for the training project; guidance and counselling related to the training project; and trainees’ wage compensation limited to the hours/days of training foreseen to be undertaken.
Natančneje, Romunija in upravičenec sta predložila ločene ocene stroškov za (neupravičene) dele programa usposabljanja za namene družbe ter „upravičene“ splošne in posebne dele, pri čemer se v zadnjem primeru razlikuje med naslednjimi kategorijami: stroški za osebje vodij usposabljanja, potni stroški vodij in udeležencev usposabljanj (vključno z nastanitvijo), amortizacija orodij in opreme, ki se uporabljajo izključno za projekt usposabljanja, usmerjanje in svetovanje v zvezi s projektom usposabljanja ter nadomestila plač vodij usposabljanja, ki so omejena na predvidene ure/dneve usposabljanja.
The regional aid approved in April 2008 related to eligible initial investment expenditure (machinery, plant, buildings) in compliance with Point 4.2 of the 2006 Regional Aid Guidelines [46].
Regionalna pomoč, ki je bila odobrena aprila 2008, se je nanašala na upravičene stroške za začetne naložbe (stroje, tovarno, poslopja) na podlagi točke 4.2 Smernic o regionalni pomoči iz leta 2006 [46].
In the present case, the notified eligible expenses cover entirely different categories of expenditure: trainer personnel costs, trainer and trainees’ travel expenses, materials and supplies, depreciation of materials and tools used for training, guidance and counselling, wage compensation for trainees exclusively related to the time spent in training.
V tej zadevi priglašeni upravičeni stroški vključujejo popolnoma različne kategorije izdatkov: stroški za osebje vodje usposabljanja, potni stroški vodij in udeležencev usposabljanj, gradivo in potrebščine, amortizacija gradiva in orodij, uporabljenih pri usposabljanju, usmerjanje in svetovanje, nadomestila plač za udeležence usposabljanj, ki so izključno povezana s časom, porabljenim za usposabljanje.
The Commission concludes from the observations made at recital 94 that, based on the submitted information, it can be considered that the proportionality conditions resulting from Article 39(2) of the GBER (establishing the applicable aid intensities), Article 39(4) of the GBER (defining the categories of eligible costs that may be taken into calculation), and Point 16 of the 2009 Training Aid Communication are satisfied.
Komisija na podlagi ugotovitev iz odstavka 94 ugotavlja, da je glede na predložene informacije mogoče skleniti, da so izpolnjeni pogoji glede sorazmernosti iz člena 39(2) Uredbe o splošnih skupinskih izjemah (kjer je določena veljavna intenzivnost pomoči), člena 39(4) Uredbe o splošnih skupinskih izjemah (kjer so določene kategorije upravičenih stroškov, ki jih je mogoče upoštevati pri izračunu) in točke 16 Sporočila o pomoči za usposabljanje iz leta 2009.
In particular, as regards the trainees’ wage costs, only those costs related to the time spent in training have been taken into consideration, in compliance with the conditions resulting from Article 39(4)(f) of the GBER.
Zlasti kar zadeva stroške za honorarje vodij usposabljanja, so bili upoštevani le stroški, povezani s časom, porabljenim za usposabljanje, skladno s pogoji iz člena 39(4)(f) Uredbe o splošnih skupinskih izjemah.
This is the case, for example, regarding the total number of employees to be covered by the proposed training project, which includes estimates of a total workforce of 9000 people by 2012.
Tako je na primer v zvezi s skupnim številom delavcev, ki bodo vključeni v predlagani program usposabljanja, kar vključuje ocene celotne delovne sile v številu 9000 delavcev do leta 2012.
A similar reasoning applies to estimates of eligible costs by categories of expenditure according to Article 39(4) of the GBER.
Podobno sklepanje se uporablja za ocene upravičenih stroškov po kategorijah izdatkov v skladu s členom 39(4) Uredbe o splošnih skupinskih izjemah.
The Commission estimated relevant market shares over the period 2007-2012 at EEA and worldwide levels, and concluded that the highest possible relevant market share reached by Ford was of 16,8 % at EEA level in 2007, with a tendency to slightly decrease over time towards 2013.
Komisija je ocenila ustrezne tržne deleže v obdobju 2007–2012 na ravni EGP in svetovni ravni, pri čemer je ugotovila, da je bil najvišji možni ustrezni tržni delež, ki ga je dosegla družba Ford, 16,8 % na ravni EGP v letu 2007, pri čemer naj bi se ta delež do leta 2013 postopno nekoliko zmanjšal.
Companies producing vehicles with very similar characteristics to B-MAV and the IVS vehicles are Renault and Opel, and respectively, Renault, Citroen, Fiat and Volkswagen.
Družbe, ki proizvajajo vozila z zelo podobnimi značilnostmi, kot jih imajo vozila B-MAV in IVS, so Renault in Opel oziroma Renault, Citroen, Fiat ter Volkswagen.
The legislative act shall also stipulate an obligation for the beneficiary to exclude from the eligible costs claimed those costs that would eventually be recovered as a consequence of benefiting from the skills acquired by the employees through training, in the sense of the last paragraph of Point 16 of the 2009 Training Aid Communication.
V zakonodajnem dokumentu je določena tudi obveznost upravičenca, da iz priglašenih upravičenih stroškov izključi tiste stroške, ki bi se lahko sčasoma vrnili zaradi koristi znanj, ki jih delavci pridobijo med usposabljanjem, v smislu zadnjega odstavka točke 16 Sporočila o pomoči za usposabljanje iz leta 2009.
The legislative act shall be communicated to the Commission within the shortest delay.
Zakonodajni dokument se čim prej predloži Komisiji.
Points 27-28 of the 1998 Training Aid Framework.
Točki 27 in 28 Okvira pomoči za usposabljanje iz leta 1998.
Point 28, for example, stated that: ‘To determine the incentive effect, the Commission will consider whether training aid has the effect of encouraging firms to do more in the way of training than they would normally do or to spend more than they would normally spend on training.
V točki 28 je bilo na primer navedeno: „Komisija bo za ugotovitev spodbujevalnega učinka upoštevala, ali pomoč za usposabljanje vpliva tako, da podjetja spodbuja k večjemu prizadevanju v smislu usposabljanja kot sicer ali večjim stroškom za usposabljanje kot običajno.
on the State aid C 27/08 (ex N 426/05) which Germany implemented for Sovello AG (formerly EverQ GmbH)
o državni pomoči C 27/08 (ex N 426/05), ki jo je Nemčija odobrila podjetju Sovello AG (prej EverQ GmbH)
(notified under document C(2010) 172)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 172)
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) of the latter,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 108(2) Pogodbe,
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [1],
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenima določbama [1],
By letter dated 29 August 2005, registered as received on 1 September 2005, Germany notified the Commission of aid to be granted in the form of a SME bonus to EverQ GmbH (hereinafter: Sovello [2]).
Z dopisom z dne 29. avgusta 2005, ki je bil evidentiran 1. septembra 2005, je Nemčija Komisijo obvestila o nameravani odobritvi pomoči v obliki dodatka za MSP podjetju EverQ GmbH (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sovello [2].
By letters dated 28 October 2005, 24 January 2006 and 4 April 2006, registered as received on the same day, Germany provided the Commission with further information.
Z dopisi z dne 28. oktobra 2005, 24. januarja 2006 in 4. aprila 2006, od katerih je bil vsak evidentiran istega dne, je Nemčija Komisiji posredovala dodatne informacije.
On 7 June 2006, the Commission approved, under reference C(2006) 2092 final, the SME bonus for Sovello (State aid case N 426/05 [3]).
Pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 2092 konč. je Komisija 7. junija 2006 družbi Sovello odobrila dodatek za MSP (državna pomoč N 426/05 [3].
During its examination of another notified aid measure for Sovello (State aid case C 21/08 [4] — ex N 864/06), the Commission uncovered evidence that the decision on State aid case N 426/2005 may have been based on incomplete/incorrect information submitted during the notification procedure.
Med preiskavo drugega priglašenega ukrepa pomoči v prid družbi Sovello (državna pomoč C 21/08 [4] – ex N 864/06) se je Komisija oprla na domnevo, da je Odločba o državni pomoči št. N 426/05 temeljila na nepopolnih oziroma nepravilnih podatkih, predloženih ob priglasitvi.
By letter dated 17 March 2008, the Commission gave Germany the opportunity to comment on the intention of the Commission to open the formal investigation procedure before possibly revoking its decision of 7 June 2006, in line with Article 9 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [5].
Z dopisom z dne 17. marca 2008 je Komisija v skladu s členom 9 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES [5] Nemčiji dala možnost, da sprejme stališče glede nameravanega začetka formalnega postopka preiskave pred morebitnim preklicem Odločbe Komisije z dne 7. junija 2006.
Germany submitted its comments by letters dated 15 April 2008, registered as received on 15 and 16 April 2008 respectively.
Nemčija je svoje stališče posredovala z dopisoma z dne 15. aprila 2008, ki sta bila evidentirana 15. oziroma 16. aprila 2008.
By letter dated 17 June 2008, with reference C(2008) 2669 final, the Commission informed Germany that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) TFEU in respect of the SME bonus granted to Sovello.
Z dopisom z dne 17. junija 2008 (C(2008) 2669 konč.) je Komisija Nemčijo obvestila o svoji odločitvi, da bo v zvezi z dodatkom za MSP, ki je bil odobren družbi Sovello, začela postopek v skladu s členom 108(2) PDEU.
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [6].
Odločitev Komisije, da sproži postopek, je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [6].
The Commission called on interested parties to submit their comments.
Komisija je vse zainteresirane stranke pozvala, naj predložijo svoje pripombe.
Germany submitted its comments by letter dated 10 September 2008, registered as received on the same day.
Nemčija je svoje pripombe predložila z dopisom z dne 10. septembra 2008, evidentiranim istega dne.
Germany submitted further comments by letters dated 20 March, 13 May, and 16 November 2009, registered as received on the same day respectively.
Nemčija je nadaljnje opombe posredovala z dopisi z dne 20. marca, 13. maja in 16. novembra 2009, od katerih je bil vsak evidentiran istega dne.
Meetings between the Commission services and the German authorities took place on 2 April and 13 October 2009.
Srečanji med predstavniki služb Komisije in predstavniki Nemčije sta potekali 2. aprila in 13. oktobra 2009.
The Commission did not receive any comments from third parties.
Komisija ni prejela pripomb tretjih strank.
The purpose of the overall aid project (regional aid granted under approved aid schemes plus the notified SME bonus) was to build a new 30 MWp plant (Sovello1) to manufacture solar modules (ProdCom code 32.10.52.37) based on the String-Ribbon technology [7].
V okviru projekta (subvencioniranega z regionalno pomočjo na podlagi odobrenih shem pomoči, vključno s priglašenim dodatkom za MSP) naj bi bil zgrajen obrat z močjo 30 MWp (Sovello 1) za izdelavo solarnih modulov (ProdCom-Code 32.10.52.37) na podlagi tehnologije „string ribbon“ [7].
The new plant was Sovello’s first production site.
Pri novem obratu je šlo za prvi proizvodni obrat družbe Sovello.
The beneficiary of the notified aid is Sovello.
Upravičenec do priglašene pomoči je družba Sovello.
Sovello was established as a joint venture in December 2004 by Q-Cells SE [9] (hereinafter Q-Cells) — owning 24,9 % of the shares — and the US firm Evergreen Solar Inc. (hereinafter: Evergreen) — owning 75,1 %.
Decembra 2004 sta podjetji Q-Cells SE [9] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Q-Cells; s 24,9-odstotnim deležem) in Evergreen Solar Inc. iz ZDA (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Evergreen; s 75,1-odstotnim deležem) ustanovili skupno podjetje Sovello.
This situation is reflected in the initial master joint venture agreement [10] dated 14 January 2005 (hereinafter: MJVA1) between Evergreen and Q-Cells.
To je razvidno iz prve okvirne pogodbe o skupnem podjetju, ki sta jo 14. januarja 2005 sklenili podjetji Evergreen in Q-Cells [10] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SSP1).
The name of the shelf-company was changed to EverQ on 11 February 2005.
Navidezno podjetje se je 11. februarja 2005 preimenovalo v EverQ.
Evergreen is a producer of solar modules and owns a patent on the String-Ribbon technology.
Podjetje Evergreen izdeluje solarne module in je imetnik patenta „string ribbon“.
Q-Cells is one of the largest producers of solar cells in the world.
Podjetje Q-Cells med največjimi proizvajalci sončnih celic na svetu.
The aim of the joint venture Sovello was to first test the economic viability of the production of solar modules — based on the String-Ribbon technology brought in by Evergreen, and the cell manufacturing know-how and experience on the German market of Q-Cells — and at a later stage to enable industrial manufacturing of String-Ribbon modules.
V skupnem podjetju Sovello naj bi se najprej preizkušala ekonomičnost proizvodnje solarnih modulov, ki temelji na tehnologiji string ribbon podjetja Evergreen in znanju podjetja Q-Cells pri proizvodnji sončnih celic ter njegovih izkušnjah na nemškem trgu, pozneje pa omogočila industrijska proizvodnja modulov s tehnologijo string ribbon.