natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Regarding condition (d), Bavaria awarded the public service obligation to TGD as a result of an open public procurement procedure as of 1 January 2005.
Bavarska je glede pogoja iz točke (d) na podlagi javnega razpisa za oddajo javnih naročil s 1. januarjem 2005 izpolnjevanje obveznosti javne službe zaupala službi TGD.
As a result of discussions with the Commission, Bavaria initiated the public procurement by launching an EU-wide tender for a service agreement entitled ‘Projektierte Maßnahmen im Bereich der Tiergesundheit landwirtschaftlicher Nutztiere in Bayern’ in June 2004.
Po posvetovanju s Komisijo je po vsej EU objavila razpis za sklenitev sporazuma o zagotavljanju storitev glede „načrtovanih ukrepov na področju dobrega počutja rejnih živali na kmetijah na Bavarskem“.
The overall measures were valued at EUR 8 million per year for a duration of five years.
Stroški splošnih ukrepov za petletno obdobje so bili ocenjeni na 8 milijonov EUR letno.
The call for tender was published in the supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union (S series) [26] and in the Bavarian Government Gazette.
Razpis je bil objavljen v Dopolnilu k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije (serija S) [26] in bavarskem uradnem listu Gesetz- und Verordnungsblatt.
Three competitors took part in the tender.
Na razpisu so sodelovali trije ponudniki.
The five-year contract was awarded to TGD as it was able to provide the requested services in the most cost-effective manner.
Petletna pogodba je bila sklenjena s službo TGD, saj je lahko zahtevane storitve izvajala po najugodnejši ceni.
A new public procurement by tender will be launched in 2009.
Leta 2009 bo objavljen nov razpis.
As regards the second alternative under condition (d), Germany claimed that for the period until 31 December 2004 it is impossible to identify a normal enterprise that is fully comparable to the TGD.
Glede druge možnosti pogoja iz točke (d) je Nemčija priznala, da za obdobje do 31. decembra 2004 ni mogoče navesti nobenega običajnega podjetja, ki bi bilo v celoti primerljivo s službo TGD.
Germany has therefore not demonstrated that for the period 1990 to 2004 the TGD was compensated in accordance with an analysis of the costs of a typical well-run undertaking providing such a public service.
Nemčija tako ni dokazala, da je bilo namestilo, izplačano službi TGD v obdobju od leta 1990 do leta 2004, določeno na podlagi analize stroškov, ki bi jih pri opravljanju zadevnih obveznosti imelo povprečno, dobro vodeno podjetje.
Thus, it can be concluded that, until 31 December 2004, the particular measure in question conferred an economic advantage upon the TGD within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Posledično je mogoče izhajati iz dejstva, da je zadevni ukrep službi TGD do 31. decembra 2004 zagotavljal gospodarsko prednost v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU.
The annual compensation granted to the TGD over the period 1990 to 2004 therefore constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU, whereas the annual compensation granted to the TGD from 1 January 2005 following a public procurement procedure complies with all the conditions cited in the Altmark judgment and therefore does not constitute State aid to the TGD.
Nadomestilo, ki se je v obdobju od leta 1990 do leta 2004 službi TGD letno dodeljevalo, torej pomeni državno pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU, medtem ko letno nadomestilo od 1. januarja 2005, izplačano na podlagi javnega razpisa, ustreza vsem navedenim pogojem iz sodbe Altmark in tako ni državna pomoč v korist službe TGD.
In this context the Commission takes note of the information submitted by Germany concerning the payments to the TGD from 1 January 2005 to end 2008 which shows that these payments did not cover the total costs of the general measures.
V zvezi s tem Komisija ugotavlja, da je iz dokumentov, ki jih je predložila Nemčija, razvidno, da plačila, službi TGD izplačana od 1. januarja 2005 do konca leta 2008, niso v celoti pokrila stroškov splošnih ukrepov.
No specific complaint or third-party observation has been made regarding fulfilment of the conditions set out in the Altmark judgment.
Glede izpolnjevanja pogojev iz sodbe Altmark niso bile predložene niti posebna pritožba niti izjave drugih zainteresiranih strani.
Compatibility of the aid with Article 106(2) TFEU
Združljivost pomoči s členom 106(2) PDEU
In order to assess the compatibility of the public service compensation granted to the TGD with the TFEU, the provisions in force at the time the aid was granted to the TGD should be taken into account.
Za oceno združljivosti nadomestila, službi TGD dodeljenega za izpolnjevanje obveznosti javne službe, s PDEU je treba uporabiti določbe, ki so veljale ob dodelitvi pomoči.
In the Commission Communication on services of general economic interest in Europe [27] (hereinafter the Communication) which is applicable under point 26(b) of the Community framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation [28] for non-notified cases, the question of State compensation should be examined in the light of three principles:
V skladu s Sporočilom Komisije o storitvah splošnega interesa v Evropi [27] (v nadaljevanju: Sporočilo), ki se uporablja za nepriglašene pomoči v skladu s točko 26(b) okvira Skupnosti za državne pomoči, dodeljene kot nadomestilo za opravljanje javnih storitev [28], je treba vprašanje državnih nadomestil preveriti v skladu z naslednjimi tremi načeli:
neutrality as regards the public or private ownership of companies,
nepristranskost glede javnega in zasebnega lastništva podjetij,
freedom of Member States to define what they regard as public services,
države članice imajo pravico, da same opredelijo storitev splošnega interesa,
proportionality, requiring that the restriction of competition and limitation of the freedom of the single market do not exceed what is necessary to guarantee effective fulfilment of the general interest mission.
sorazmerje, ki zagotavlja, da omejitve konkurence in svoboščin skupnega trga ne presegajo tistega, kar je potrebno za zagotovitev učinkovite izpolnitve naloge v javnem interesu.
The first principle, neutrality, means that the Commission does not indicate whether undertakings responsible for providing general interest services should be public or private.
Prvo načelo, nepristranskost, pomeni, da Komisija ne določa, ali storitve splošnega interesa izvajajo javna ali zasebna podjetja.
Compliance with this principle is not called into question in the present case.
V obravnavanem primeru se o spoštovanju tega načela ne dvomi.
The freedom of Member States to define a service of general economic interest means that Member States are primarily responsible for defining what they regard as services of general economic interest on the basis of the specific features of activities.
Pravica držav članic, da same opredelijo storitev splošnega interesa, pomeni, da so za opredelitev tistega, kar naj na podlagi posebnih značilnosti neke dejavnosti obvelja kot storitev splošnega gospodarskega interesa, pristojne predvsem države članice.
The Commission intervenes in respect of this definition only in the event of abuses or manifest errors.
Glede te opredelitve poseže Komisija samo v primeru zlorabe pri uporabi oziroma očitnih napakah.
In every case, however, for the exceptions in Article 106(2) TFEU to apply, the public service mission needs to be clearly defined and explicitly entrusted through an act of a public authority (including contracts).
Določbe o izjemah iz člena 106(2) PDEU se v posamičnem primeru vendarle lahko uporabljajo le takrat, kadar je obveznost opravljanja storitev jasno opredeljena in izrecno prenesena z oblastvenim aktom (vključno s pogodbami).
This is necessary to ensure legal certainty and public transparency and is essential for the Commission to carry out its proportionality assessment.
Iz razlogov pravne gotovosti in preglednosti v razmerju do javnosti je to nujno in tudi potrebno, da lahko Komisija preveri sorazmernost ukrepa.
The general measures entrusted to the TGD qualify as a service of general economic interest and were clearly defined and entrusted to the TGD, as stated in recital 92.
Splošne ukrepe, prenesene na službo TGD, je mogoče opredeliti kot storitev splošnega gospodarskega interesa in so bili, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 92, jasno opredeljeni in preneseni na službo TGD.
In view of the proportionality principle, Article 106(2) TFEU should be taken as meaning that the means used to fulfil the general interest mission must not create unnecessary distortion of trade or exceed what is necessary to guarantee actual fulfilment of the mission.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti je treba člen 106(2) PDEU razlagati tako, da sredstva, uporabljena za izpolnitev obveznosti opravljanja storitev, ne povzročajo nepotrebnega izkrivljanja trgovine in presegajo tistega, kar je nujno potrebno za dejansko izpolnitev obveznosti.
In line with point 26 of the Communication and the Court’s case law at the time, the compensation should not exceed the net extra costs of the particular task entrusted to the undertaking.
Nadomestilo v skladu s točko 26 Sporočila in sedanjo sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije ne sme presegati neto dodatnih stroškov, povezanih z zaupano obveznostjo.
The performance of the general interest service must be ensured and the undertaking entrusted with such a task must be able to bear the specific additional cost of the task.
Zagotovljeno mora biti opravljanje storitev splošnega pomena, podjetja, ki jim je to zaupano, pa morajo biti sposobna nositi dodatne stroške, povezane z izvajanjem te obveznosti.
It is therefore necessary in this case to quantify the net extra costs of the public service obligation (general measures) imposed on the TGD by the two agreements and then compare these costs with the State aid.
V obravnavanem primeru je torej treba obračunati neto dodatne stroške, ki jih je imela TGD zaradi opravljanja javne storitve (splošnih ukrepov) na podlagi obeh dogovorov, rezultat pa nato primerjati z državnimi pomočmi.
If the compensation granted to the TGD is not higher than the additional costs of the public service obligation, the proportionality principle can be regarded as having been fulfilled.
Če nadomestilo, dodeljeno službi TGD, ne presega dodatnih stroškov zaradi obveznosti opravljanja storitev, se lahko načelo sorazmernosti šteje za izpolnjeno.
Over the relevant period of 1990 to 2004, the additional costs arising from the general measures exceeded the aid granted to the TGD (see Annex to this Decision).
V obdobju od leta 1990 do leta 2004, ki je pomembno za odločanje, so dodatni stroški zaradi splošnih ukrepov presegali pomoči, dodeljene službi TGD, kot je razvidno iz Priloge k temu sklepu.
As a consequence, the payments the TGD received for the general measures that are the object of this Decision did not lead to overcompensation of the additional costs it incurred in carrying out the measures.
Zato plačila, ki jih je TGD prejela za splošne ukrepe, ki so predmet tega sklepa, ne pomenijo čezmerne izravnave dodatnih stroškov, ki jih je TGD imela z izvajanjem teh ukrepov.
Accordingly, the public service compensation granted to the TGD over the period 1990 to 2004 constitutes State aid under Article 107(1) TFEU which is compatible with Article 106(2) TFEU.
V skladu z navedenim pomeni nadomestilo za izvajanje javnih storitev, ki ga je TGD prejela v obdobju 1990–2004, državno pomoč v smislu člena 107(1), ki je združljiva s členom 106(2) PDEU.
The Commission notes in this respect, however, that it is difficult to see how the State compensation that did not even cover the total additional costs of the public service obligation could have been used to subsidise the profit-oriented activities of the TGD, as alleged by the plaintiff.
Komisija v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da ni razvidno, kako bi lahko državno nadomestilo, s katerim niso bili pokriti niti vsi dodatni stroški obveznosti opravljanja storitev, uporabili za subvencioniranje pridobitne dejavnosti službe TGD, kot je navedel pritožnik.
In addition, the plaintiff’s claim that the veterinary surgeons employed by the TGD provide certain clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic services at up to 90 % below cost price has not been proven, either by the plaintiff or by another concerned party.
Poleg tega niti pritožnik niti druge zainteresirane strani niso dokazali, da so pri službi TGD zaposleni veterinarji nekatere klinične, diagnostične in terapevtske storitve opravljali po cenah, ki so bile do 90 % nižje od osnovnih stroškov.
Because of this claim, Germany carried out a specific audit of the TGD.
Zaradi te trditve je Nemčija opravila posebno revizijo službe TGD.
There was no evidence to confirm the claim.
Najden ni bil noben dokaz, ki bi potrdil to trditev.
Should any concrete data confirming any such claim arise, Germany has requested to be informed so that it can investigate the case individually.
Zato je Nemčija zaprosila, naj bo obveščena, če se bodo pojavile konkretne informacije v zvezi s tem, da bi lahko preverila vsak posamičen primer.
The Commission also notes that the Bayerische Landestierärztekammer (Bavarian Association of Independent Veterinarians) and the Bundesverband praktizierender Tierärzte — Landesverband Bayern (Bavarian branch of the Federal Association of Veterinary Practitioners) support the activities of the TGD — including the profit-oriented elements.
Komisija poleg tega ugotavlja, da sta bavarska deželna veterinarska zbornica (Bayerische Landestierärztekammer) in zvezno združenje veterinarjev praktikov – deželno združenje Bavarske (Bundesverband praktizierender Tierärzte – Landesverband Bayern) podpirala delo službe TGD, vključno z njegovo pridobitno dejavnostjo.
The Commission concludes that Germany granted the aid in question in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je Nemčija z dodelitvijo zadevne pomoči kršila člen 108(3) PDEU.
On the basis of its assessment, however, it has decided that the State aid in the form of ‘general measures’ for farmers (as from 1990), as referred to in recitals 13 and 14, and the State compensation granted to TGD to discharge the related public service obligation entrusted to it during the period 1990 to 2004, as referred to in recital 17 and 18, are compatible with the TFEU.
Komisija na podlagi ocene sprejema sklepno ugotovitev, da sta državna pomoč iz uvodnih izjav 13 in 14, dodeljena kmetom v obliki „splošnih ukrepov“ (od leta 1990), in državna pomoč iz uvodnih izjav 17 in 18, dodeljena službi TGD za izvajanje javne storitve v obdobju od leta 1990 do leta 2004, združljivi s PDEU.
In fact, as explained above, part of it does not even constitute State aid.
Kot je navedeno, deloma dejansko to sploh ni državna pomoč.
The annual compensation referred to in recitals 17 and 18, granted to the TGD from 1 January 2005 to discharge a public service obligation, complies with all the conditions of the Altmark judgment and therefore does not constitute State aid,
Letno nadomestilo iz uvodnih izjav 17 in 18, ki je bilo od 1. januarja 2005 službi TGD odobreno za izvajanje javnih storitev, ustreza vsem predpostavkam iz sodbe Altmark in tako ne pomeni državne pomoči –
The aid granted to farmers and fishermen by Germany in the form of general measures is compatible with the internal market.
Pomoč, ki jo je Nemčija dodelila kmetom in ribičem v obliki splošnih ukrepov, je združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The aid granted to the Animal Health Service (TGD) by Germany in the period 1990 to 2004 in the form of compensation for the TGD’s discharging of the general measures is compatible with the internal market.
Pomoč, ki jo je Nemčija odobrila veterinarski službi TGD v obdobju od leta 1999 do leta 2004 v obliki nadomestila za izvajanje „splošnih ukrepov“ prek te veterinarske službe, je združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The compensation granted to the Animal Health Service since 1 January 2005 for discharging the general measures does not represent aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Nadomestilo, dodeljeno veterinarski službi od 1. januarja 2005 za izvajanje „splošnih ukrepov“, ni državna pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU.
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Zvezno republiko Nemčijo.
On 1 December 2009, Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty were replaced by Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Namesto členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES od 1. decembra 2009 veljata člena 107 in 108 PDEU.
The two sets of provisions are, in substance, identical.
Člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES sta v bistvu enaka členoma 107 in 108 PDEU.
For the purposes of this Decision, references to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU should be understood as references to Articles 87 and 88, respectively, of the EC Treaty where appropriate.
V tem sklepu je treba sklicevanja na člena 107 in 108 PDEU razumeti kot sklicevanja na člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES, kadar je to primerno.
OJ C 244, 11.10.2006, p. 15.
UL C 244, 11.10.2006, str. 15.
Judgment in Case C-39/94 SFEI [1996] ECR I-3547, paragraph 60.
Sodba z dne 11. julija 1996 v zadevi SFEI, C-39/94, Recueil 1996, str. I-3547, točka 60.
Judgment in Case C-301/87 France v Commission [1990] ECR I-307, paragraph 41.
Sodba z dne 14. februarja 1990 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji, C-301/87, Recueil 1990, str. I-307, točka 41.
According to European Court of Justice case-law, the strengthening of an undertaking’s position vis-à-vis its competitors as a result of financial aid granted by a Member State is an indication of a distortion of competition (Judgment in Case C-730/79 Philip Morris v Commission [1980] ECR 2671, paragraphs 11 and 12).
Iz sodne prakse Sodišča je razvidno, da krepitev položaja podjetja v primerjavi z drugimi tekmeci zaradi finančne pomoči, ki jo je odobrila država članica, na splošno pomeni izkrivljanje konkurence (sodba z dne 17. septembra 1980 v zadevi Philip Morris proti Komisiji, C-730/79, Recueil 1980, str. 2671, točki 11 in 12).
In 2007, the value of German intra-EU trade in agricultural products was EUR 45327 million (imports) and EUR 37514 million (exports) (Source: Eurostat).
Vrednost trgovine Nemčije s kmetijskimi proizvodi v Skupnosti je leta 2007 znašala 45327 milijonov EUR (uvoz) oziroma 37514 milijonov EUR (izvoz) (vir: Eurostat).
Commission working document No VI/5934/86 of 10 November 1986.
Delovni dokument Komisije št. VI/5934/86 z dne 10. novembra 1986.
State aids NN 23/97, N 426/03 and N 81/04 (still in force).
Glej državne štátnej pomoči NN 23/97, N 426/03 in N 81/04 (še velja).
See letter E of the Guidelines for the examination of State aid to fisheries and aquaculture from 1988 (OJ C 313, 8.12.1988, p. 21); point 2.5 of those from 1992 (OJ C 152, 17.6.1992, p. 2); point 2.9 of those from 1994 (OJ C 260, 17.9.1994, p. 3); point 2.9 of those from 1997 (OJ C 100, 27.3.1997, p. 12); point 2.8 of those from 2001 (OJ C 19, 20.1.2001, p. 7).
Glej točko E Smernic za pregled državnih pomoči za ribištvo in ribogojstvo iz leta 1988 (UL C 313, 8.12.1988, str. 21), točko 2.5 smernic iz leta 1992 (UL C 152, 17.6.1992, str. 2), točko 2.9 smernic iz leta 1994 (UL C 260, 17.9.1994, str. 3), točko 2.9 smernic iz leta 1997 (UL C 100, 27.3.1997, str. 12) in točko 2.8 smernic iz leta 2001 (UL C 19, 20.1.2001, str. 7).
Judgments in Case C-280/00 Altmark [2003] ECR I-7747 and Joined Cases C-34/01 to C-38/01 Enirisorse [2003] ECR I-14243.
Sodba z dne 24. julija 2003 v zadevi Altmark, C-280/00, Recueil 2003, str. I-7747, in sodba z dne 27. novembra 2003 v združenih zadevah Enirisorse, od C-34/01 do C-38/01, Recueil 2003, str. I-14243.
Cost of the general measures
Znesek stroškov skupnih ukrepov
Payments from Land of Bavaria (LwFöG)
Plačila Svobodna dežela Bavarska
Payments from the Bavarian Animal Disease Fund
(LwFöG) Plačila BTSK
Payments from Land of Bavaria and the Bavarian Animal Disease Fund
Plačila Svobodna dežela Bavarska in BTSK
Share of total payments in costs of general measures
Skupni delež plačil v celotnih stroških ukrepov
In reply to these letters, Germany submitted information in letters dated 4 July 2000, 22 December 2000, 22 November 2002, 10 April 2003, 1 December 2003 and 27 June 2005.
Nemčija je v odgovor nanje predložila informacije v dopisih z dne 4. julija 2000, 22. decembra 2000, 22. novembra 2002, 10. aprila 2003, 1. decembra 2003 in 27. junija 2005.
A meeting with German officials took place on 17 July 2003.
Sestanek s predstavniki Nemčije je bil organiziran 17. julija 2003.
The measure had been in operation since 1974.
Ukrep se je izvajal od leta 1974.
Despite enquiries, it was not possible to find proof of the measure having been notified.
Kljub poizvedovanju priglasitve ukrepa ni bilo mogoče dokazati.
The Commission investigation started in 2000.
Komisija je postopek preiskave sprožila leta 2000.
The ten-year period laid down in Article 15(2) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 therefore goes back to 1990.
Tako desetletni rok, predviden v členu 15(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999, zajema obdobje do leta 1990.
Therefore, aid paid before this period will not be investigated further.
Na tej podlagi pomoči, izplačane pred navedenim letom, niso predmet nadaljnje preiskave.
The Commission bases its examination of aid to prevent and combat animal diseases on point 11.4 of the Community Guidelines.
Komisija se pri presoji pomoči za preprečevanje in zatiranje kužnih bolezni živali opira na točko 11.4 okvira Skupnosti.
Such aid is regarded as compatible with Articles 107 and 108 TFEU if the following conditions are met.
Taka pomoč velja za združljivo s členoma 107 in 108 PDEU, kadar so izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji.
The Community Guidelines are based on the same principles as the Commission working document of 10 November 1986.
Okvir Skupnosti temelji na enakih načelih kot delovni dokument Komisije z dne 10. novembra 1986.
Therefore, the same assessment also applies to the aid given to farmers from 1990 to 1999, which also has to be considered in line with these principles.
Posledično velja enaka presoja tudi za pomoči, kmetom dodeljene od leta 1990 do leta 1999, ki jih je torej treba obravnavati kot združljive z navedenimi načeli.
Were the aid to farmers to cover consultancy costs, this would constitute technical support within the meaning of point 103 of the Guidelines.
Če pomoč v korist kmetov vključuje stroške svetovanja, je to zagotovitev tehnične pomoči v smislu točke 103 okvirne ureditve.
In line with this point, the Commission will declare State aid for technical support compatible with Article 107(3)(c) TFEU if it fulfils the conditions of Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006.
Temu primerno Komisija razglasi državne pomoči za zagotovitev tehnične pomoči za združljive s členom 107(3)(c) PDEU, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 15 Uredbe (ES) št. 1857/2006.
In respect of the aid in question, the conditions under these Regulations and the general principles under point 3 of the 2008 Guidelines have remained the same in terms of substance as the provisions that applied to the aid granted before 1 April 2008.
Glede zadevnih pomoči so preostali pogoji teh uredb in splošna načela točke 3 smernic iz leta 2008 vsebinsko enaki predpisom, ki so veljali za pomoči, dodeljene pred 1. aprilom 2008.
Therefore the assessment carried out for that aid can also be applied to the aid granted after 1 April 2008.
Zato je mogoče vrednotenje teh pomoči uporabiti tudi za pomoči, dodeljene po 1. aprilu 2008.
As the aid granted before 1 April 2008 is compatible with the applicable provisions and as the aid and the way in which it was granted remained unchanged after 1 April 2008, the Commission concludes that the aid meets the conditions under the provisions applying in the fisheries and aquaculture sector.
Ker so pomoči, dodeljene pred 1. aprilom 2008, združljive z veljavnimi predpisi ter ker so pomoči in način njihovega dodeljevanja po 1. aprilu 2008 ostali nespremenjeni, Komisija posledično ugotavlja, da pomoči izpolnjujejo zahteve predpisov, ki veljajo za ribištvo in ribogojstvo.