natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Due to the high level of technological innovation and highly dynamic markets in the electronic communications sector, there is a need to adapt regulation rapidly in a coordinated and harmonised way at Community level, as experience has shown that divergence among the national regulatory authorities in the implementation of the EU regulatory framework may create a barrier to the development of the internal market.
Zaradi visoke ravni tehnoloških inovacij in zelo dinamičnih trgov v sektorju elektronskih komunikacij bi morali na ravni Skupnosti ureditev hitro in usklajeno prilagoditi, saj izkušnje kažejo, da bi razlike med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi pri izvajanju regulativnega okvira EU lahko ovirale razvoj notranjega trga.
One important task assigned to BEREC is to adopt opinions in relation to cross-border disputes where appropriate.
Ena od pomembnih nalog, dodeljenih BERECu, je sprejemanje mnenj o čezmejnih sporih.
National regulatory authorities should therefore take account of any opinions of BEREC in such cases.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi zato v takih primerih morali upoštevati morebitna mnenja BERECa.
Experience in the implementation of the EU regulatory framework indicates that existing provisions empowering national regulatory authorities to impose fines have failed to provide an adequate incentive to comply with regulatory requirements.
Izkušnje pri izvajanju regulativnega okvira EU kažejo, da obstoječe določbe, s katerimi so nacionalni regulativni organi pooblaščeni za nalaganje denarnih kazni, niso zagotovile ustrezne spodbude za skladnost z regulativnimi zahtevami.
Adequate enforcement powers can contribute to the timely implementation of the EU regulatory framework and therefore foster regulatory certainty, which is an important driver for investment.
Ustrezna izvršilna pooblastila lahko prispevajo k pravočasnemu izvajanju regulativnega okvira in tako spodbujajo regulativno predvidljivost, ki je pomembno gonilo naložb.
The lack of effective powers in the event of non-compliance applies across the regulatory framework.
Pomanjkanje učinkovitih pooblastil v primeru neskladnosti je značilno za celoten regulativni okvir EU.
The introduction of a new provision in Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive) to deal with breaches of obligations under the Framework Directive and Specific Directives should therefore ensure the application of consistent and coherent principles to enforcement and penalties for the whole EU regulatory framework.
Nova določba v Direktivi 2002/ES/ES (Okvirni direktivi) o obravnavi kršitev obveznosti iz Okvirne direktive in posebnih direktiv naj bi zato zagotovila uporabo skladnih in doslednih načel za izvrševanje in kazni za celoten regulativni okvir EU.
The existing EU regulatory framework includes certain provisions to facilitate the transition from the old regulatory framework of 1998 to the new 2002 framework.
Obstoječi regulativni okvir EU vključuje nekatere določbe za pospeševanje prehoda s starega regulativnega okvira iz leta 1998 na nov okvir iz leta 2002.
This transition has been completed in all Member States and these measures should be repealed as they are now redundant.
Ta prehod je bil izveden v vseh državah članicah, te določbe pa bi bilo treba razveljaviti, saj sedaj niso več potrebne.
Both efficient investment and competition should be encouraged in tandem, in order to increase economic growth, innovation and consumer choice.
Učinkovite naložbe in konkurenco bi bil treba spodbujati skupaj, da se povečajo gospodarska rast, inovacije in možnosti izbire za potrošnike.
Competition can best be fostered through an economically efficient level of investment in new and existing infrastructure, complemented by regulation, wherever necessary, to achieve effective competition in retail services.
Konkurenca se lahko najbolje spodbuja z ekonomsko učinkovito ravnijo vlaganj v novo in obstoječo infrastrukturo, ki so po potrebi dopolnjena z urejanjem, da se doseže učinkovita konkurenca maloprodajnih storitev.
An efficient level of infrastructure-based competition is the extent of infrastructure duplication at which investors can reasonably be expected to make a fair return based on reasonable expectations about the evolution of market shares.
Učinkovita raven konkurence, ki temelji na infrastrukturi, je stopnja podvajanja infrastrukture, pri kateri se lahko ob upoštevanju razumnih pričakovanj glede razvoja tržnih deležev, razumno pričakuje, da bodo vlagatelji dobili pošteno povračilo.
National regulatory authorities should, when imposing obligations for access to new and enhanced infrastructures, ensure that access conditions reflect the circumstances underlying the investment decision, taking into account, inter alia, the roll-out costs, the expected rate of take up of the new products and services and the expected retail price levels.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali pri določanju obveznosti za dostop do novih in izboljšanih infrastruktur zagotoviti, da pogoji dostopa odražajo okoliščine, na katerih temelji naložbena odločitev, in da se pri tem med drugim upoštevajo stroški za postavitev, pričakovana hitrost uveljavitve novih proizvodov in storitev ter pričakovane ravni maloprodajnih cen.
Moreover, in order to provide planning certainty to investors, national regulatory authorities should be able to set, if applicable, terms and conditions for access which are consistent over appropriate review periods.
Poleg tega bi morali nacionalni regulativni organi, da bi zagotovili gotovost načrtovanja za vlagatelje, imeti možnost, da po potrebi določijo pogoje za dostop, ki ostanejo koherentni v ustreznih obdobjih pregleda.
Such terms and conditions may include pricing arrangements which depend on volumes or length of contract in accordance with Community law and provided they have no discriminatory effect.
Ti pogoji lahko vključujejo dogovore o cenah, ki so odvisne od obsega ali dolžine pogodbe, v skladu s pravom Skupnosti in pod pogojem, da nimajo diskriminatornega učinka.
Any access conditions imposed should respect the need to preserve effective competition in services to consumers and businesses.
Vsi naloženi pogoji za dostop bi morali spoštovati potrebo po ohranitvi učinkovite konkurence pri storitvah za uporabnike in podjetja.
When assessing the proportionality of the obligations and conditions to be imposed, national regulatory authorities should take into account the different competitive conditions existing in the different areas within their Member States.
Pri ocenjevanju sorazmernosti obveznosti in pogojev, ki bodo naloženi, bi morali nacionalni regulativni organi upoštevati razlike v konkurenčnih pogojih, ki obstajajo med različnimi območji v njihovi državi članici.
When imposing remedies to control prices, national regulatory authorities should seek to allow a fair return for the investor on a particular new investment project.
Pri nalaganju ukrepov za nadzor nad cenami bi si morali nacionalni regulativni organi prizadevati, da vlagatelji omogočijo pošteno povračilo pri posameznem novem naložbenem projektu.
In particular, there may be risks associated with investment projects specific to new access networks which support products for which demand is uncertain at the time the investment is made.
Zlasti lahko obstajajo tveganja, povezana z naložbenimi projekti za nova dostopovna omrežja, ki podpirajo proizvode, po katerih je v času naložbe povpraševanje negotovo.
Any Commission decision under Article 19(1) of Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive) should be limited to regulatory principles, approaches and methodologies.
Vse odločitve Komisije v skladu s členom 19(1) Direktive 2002/21/ES (Okvirne direktive) bi morale biti omejene na regulativna načela, pristope in metodologije.
For the avoidance of doubt, it should not prescribe detail which will normally need to reflect national circumstances, and it should not prohibit alternative approaches which can reasonably be expected to have equivalent effect.
Da ne bi bilo dvomov, takšna odločitev ne bi smela predpisovati podrobnosti, ki bi praviloma morale odražati nacionalne okoliščine, in ne bi smela prepovedovati alternativnih pristopov, za katere se lahko razumno pričakuje, da bodo imeli enakovreden učinek.
Such a decision should be proportionate and should not have an effect on decisions taken by national regulatory authorities that do not create a barrier to the internal market.
Takšna odločitev bi morala biti sorazmerna in ne bi smela vplivati na odločitve, ki jih sprejemajo nacionalni regulativni organi in ki ne predstavljajo ovir za notranji trg.
Annex I to Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive) identified the list of markets to be included in the Recommendation on relevant product and service markets which may warrant ex-ante regulation.
V Prilogi I k Direktivi 2002/21/ES (Okvirni direktivi) je opredeljen seznam trgov, ki jih je treba vključiti v priporočilo o upoštevnih trgih izdelkov in storitev, ki so lahko predmet ex ante urejanja.
This Annex should be repealed since its purpose of serving as a basis for drawing up the initial version of the Recommendation on Relevant Product and Service Markets has been fulfilled.
To prilogo bi bilo treba razveljaviti, saj je bil njen namen služiti kot podlaga za pripravo prvotne različice Priporočila o upoštevnih trgih proizvodov in storitev izpolnjen.
It may not be economically viable for new entrants to duplicate the incumbent's local access network in part or in its entirety within a reasonable period of time.
Za nove udeležence na trgu morda ne bi bilo ekonomsko izvedljivo v razumnem roku deloma ali v celoti podvojiti infrastrukturo krajevnega dostopovnega omrežja prvotnega obratovalca.
In this context, mandating unbundled access to the local loop or sub-loop of operators enjoying significant market power may facilitate market entry and increase competition in retail broadband access markets.
V tem smislu bi obveznost razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke ali krajevne podzanke za obratovalce, ki imajo znatno tržno moč, lahko poenostavila vstop na trg in povečala konkurenco na maloprodajnih trgih širokopasovnega dostopa.
In circumstances where unbundled access to local loop or sub-loop is not technically or economically feasible, relevant obligations for the provision of non-physical or virtual network access offering equivalent functionality may apply.
Če razvezan dostop do krajevne zanke ali krajevne podzanke tehnično ali ekonomsko ni izvedljiv, se lahko uporabljajo ustrezne obveznosti v zvezi z zagotavljanjem dostopa do nefizičnih oziroma virtualnih omrežij, ki zagotavljajo enakovredno delovanje.
The purpose of functional separation, whereby the vertically integrated operator is required to establish operationally separate business entities, is to ensure the provision of fully equivalent access products to all downstream operators, including the operator’s own vertically integrated downstream divisions.
Namen funkcionalne ločitve, pri kateri mora vertikalno integriran obratovalec ustanoviti operativno ločene poslovne subjekte, je zagotoviti popolnoma enakovredne dostopovne izdelke vsem podobratovalcem, vključno z lastnimi podenotami vertikalno integriranega obratovalca.
Functional separation has the capacity to improve competition in several relevant markets by significantly reducing the incentive for discrimination and by making it easier to verify and enforce compliance with non-discrimination obligations.
Funkcionalna ločitev lahko izboljša konkurenco na več upoštevnih trgih, in sicer z zmanjšanjem spodbud za diskriminacijo ter z olajšanjem preverjanja in uveljavljanja skladnosti z obveznostmi nediskriminacije.
In exceptional cases, functional separation may be justified as a remedy where there has been persistent failure to achieve effective non-discrimination in several of the markets concerned, and where there is little or no prospect of infrastructure competition within a reasonable time-frame after recourse to one or more remedies previously considered to be appropriate.
V izjemnih primerih je funkcionalno ločitev mogoče upravičeno uporabiti kot sredstvo za izboljšanje položaja, kadar nikakor ni mogoče doseči dejanske nediskriminacije na mnogih zadevnih trgih in kadar obstaja majhna možnost ali pa je sploh ni za konkurenco na področju infrastrukture v razumnem časovnem obdobju po uporabi enega ali več teh sredstev, ki so se prej zdeli primerni.
However, it is very important to ensure that its imposition preserves the incentives of the concerned undertaking to invest in its network and that it does not entail any potential negative effects on consumer welfare.
Vendar je zelo pomembno zagotoviti, da uvedba funkcionalne ločitve ne odvrne zadevnega podjetja od naložb v svoje omrežje in nima neugodnega učinka na blaginjo potrošnika.
Its imposition requires a coordinated analysis of different relevant markets related to the access network, in accordance with the market analysis procedure set out in Article 16 of Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive).
Uvedba funkcionalne ločitve zahteva usklajeno analizo različnih upoštevnih trgov, povezanih z dostopovnim omrežjem, v skladu s postopkom analize trga, določenim v členu 16 Direktive 2002/21/ES (Okvirne direktive).
When undertaking the market analysis and designing the details of this remedy, national regulatory authorities should pay particular attention to the products to be managed by the separate business entities, taking into account the extent of network roll-out and the degree of technological progress, which may affect the substitutability of fixed and wireless services.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali biti pri izvajanju analize trga in oblikovanju podrobnosti tega ukrepa posebej pozorni na izdelke, ki naj jih upravljajo ločeni poslovni subjekti, ob upoštevanju obsega razvoja omrežja in stopnje tehnološkega napredka, ki lahko vplivata na zamenljivost fiksnih in brezžičnih storitev.
In order to avoid distortions of competition in the internal market, proposals for functional separation should be approved in advance by the Commission.
Da bi se izognili izkrivljanju konkurence na notranjem trgu, bi morala predloge za funkcionalno ločitev predhodno odobriti Komisija.
The implementation of functional separation should not prevent appropriate coordination mechanisms between the different separate business entities in order to ensure that the economic and management supervision rights of the parent company are protected.
Funkcionalno ločevanje ne bi smelo preprečiti ustreznih mehanizmov usklajevanja med različnimi ločenimi poslovnimi subjekti za zagotovitev varstva pravic gospodarskega in upravljavskega nadzora matičnega podjetja.
Continued integration of the internal market for electronic communications networks and services requires better coordination in the application of the ex-ante regulation provided for under the EU regulatory framework for electronic communications.
Zaradi nenehnega povezovanja notranjega trga za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve je potrebno boljše usklajevanje pri izvajanju ex ante ureditve, ki jo določa regulativni okvir EU za elektronske komunikacije.
Where a vertically integrated undertaking chooses to transfer a substantial part or all of its local access network assets to a separate legal entity under different ownership or by establishing a separate business entity for dealing with access products, the national regulatory authority should assess the effect of the intended transaction on all existing regulatory obligations imposed on the vertically integrated operator in order to ensure the compatibility of any new arrangements with Directive 2002/19/EC (Access Directive) and Directive 2002/22/EC (Universal Service Directive).
Če se vertikalno integrirano podjetje odloči, da bo prodalo znatni del ali vsa sredstva krajevnega dostopnega omrežja ločeni pravni osebi z drugim lastnikom ali z ustanovitvijo ločenega poslovnega subjekta za upravljanje izdelkov z dostopom, bi moral nacionalni regulativni organ oceniti učinek načrtovane transakcije na vse obstoječe regulativne obveznosti, naložene vertikalno integriranemu operaterju za zagotovitev združljivosti nove ureditve z Direktivo 2002/19/ES (Direktiva o dostopu) in Direktivo 2002/22/ES (Direktiva o univerzalnih storitvah).
The national regulatory authority concerned should undertake a new analysis of the markets in which the segregated entity operates, and impose, maintain, amend or withdraw obligations accordingly.
Zadevni nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali izvesti novo analizo trgov, na katerih deluje ločena pravna oseba, in skladno s tem uvesti, ohraniti, spremeniti ali odpraviti obveznosti.
To this end, the national regulatory authority should be able to request information from the undertaking.
Zaradi tega bi moral biti nacionalni regulativni organ sposoben, da od podjetja zahteva informacije.
While it is appropriate in some circumstances for a national regulatory authority to impose obligations on operators that do not have significant market power in order to achieve goals such as end-to-end connectivity or interoperability of services, it is however necessary to ensure that such obligations are imposed in conformity with the EU regulatory framework and, in particular, its notification procedures.
Čeprav je v določenih okoliščinah sicer primerno, da nacionalni regulativni organ naloži obveznosti obratovalcem, ki nimajo pomembne tržne moči, da bi se dosegli cilji, kot je povezljivost ali medobratovalnost storitev med koncema, pa je treba zagotoviti tudi, da se take obveznosti naložijo v skladu z regulativnim okvirom EU in zlasti njegovimi postopki priglašanja.
The Commission should be empowered to adopt implementing measures with a view to adapting the conditions for access to digital television and radio services set out in Annex I to market and technological developments.
Komisija bi bilo treba podeliti pooblastila za sprejetje izvedbenih ukrepov za prilagoditev pogojev dostopa do digitalne televizije in radijskih storitev iz Priloge I tržnemu in tehnološkemu razvoju.
This is also the case for the minimum list of items in Annex II that must be made public to meet the obligation of transparency.
To velja tudi za minimalni seznam zadev iz Priloge II, ki jih je treba javno objaviti ter tako izpolniti obveznost zagotavljanja preglednosti.
Facilitating access to radio frequency resources for market players will contribute to removing the barriers to market entry.
Olajšanje dostopa do virov radijskih frekvenc za akterje na trgu bo prispevalo k odstranitvi ovir za vstop na trg.
Moreover, technological progress is reducing the risk of harmful interference in certain frequency bands and therefore reducing the need for individual rights of use.
Poleg tega tehnološki napredek zmanjšuje tveganje škodljivega motenja v določenih frekvenčnih pasovih in s tem zmanjšuje potrebo po individualnih pravicah do uporabe.
Conditions for the use of spectrum to provide electronic communication services should therefore normally be laid down in general authorisations unless individual rights are necessary, considering the use of the spectrum, to protect against harmful interference, to ensure technical quality of service, to safeguard efficient use of the spectrum or to meet a specific general interest objective.
Pogoji za uporabo spektra za zagotovitev elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev bi se zato načeloma morali določiti v splošnih odobritvah, razen če so zaradi uporabe spektra potrebne individualne pravice za zaščito pred škodljivim motenjem, za zagotovitev tehnične kakovosti storitve, varovanje učinkovite uporabe spektra ali za doseganje cilja posebnega splošnega interesa.
Decisions on the need for individual rights should be made in a transparent and proportionate manner.
Odločitve v zvezi s potrebo po individualnih pravicah se sprejmejo na pregleden in sorazmeren način.
The introduction of the requirements of service and technology neutrality in granting rights of use, together with the increased possibility to transfer rights between undertakings, should increase the freedom and means to deliver electronic communications services to the public, thereby also facilitating the achievement of general interest objectives.
Uvedba zahtev po nevtralnosti storitev in tehnološki nevtralnosti pri dodeljevanju pravic do uporabe bi skupaj s povečano možnostjo za prenos pravic med podjetji morala povečati svobodo in sredstva za zagotavljanje storitev elektronskih komunikacij javnosti, s čimer bi pospešila tudi doseganje ciljev splošnega interesa.
However, certain general interest obligations imposed on broadcasters for the delivery of audiovisual media services may require the use of specific criteria for the granting of rights of use when it appears to be essential to meet a specific general interest objective set out by Member States in conformity with Community law.
Vendar pa določene obveznosti splošnega interesa, naložene radiodifuzijskim hišam za zagotavljanje avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev, lahko zahtevajo uporabo posebnih meril za dodeljevanje pravic do uporabe, kadar se zdi, da je bistvenega pomena, da se izpolni posebni cilj splošnega interesa, ki ga določijo države članice v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti.
Procedures associated with the pursuit of general interest objectives should in all circumstances be transparent, objective, proportionate and non-discriminatory.
Postopki, povezani z doseganjem ciljev splošnega interesa, bi morali biti vedno pregledni, objektivni, sorazmerni in nediskriminatorni.
Considering its restrictive impact on free access to radio frequencies, the validity of an individual right of use that is not tradable should be limited in time.
Glede na omejevalni vpliv individualne pravice uporabe na prost dostop do radijskih frekvenc bi morala biti veljavnost te pravice, s katero ni mogoče trgovati, časovno omejena.
Where rights of use contain provision for renewing their validity, competent national authorities should first carry out a review, including a public consultation, taking into account market, coverage and technological developments.
Če pravice uporabe vsebujejo določbe za podaljšanje veljavnosti, bi morali pristojni nacionalni organi najprej izvesti pregled in javno posvetovanje ter pri tem upoštevati trg, obseg in tehnološki razvoj.
In view of spectrum scarcity, individual rights granted to undertakings should be regularly reviewed.
Glede na pomanjkanje spektra bi bilo treba individualne pravice, podeljene podjetjem, redno pregledovati.
In carrying out this review, competent national authorities should balance the interests of the rights holders with the need to foster the introduction of spectrum trading as well as the more flexible use of spectrum through general authorisations where possible.
Pri tem pregledu bi morali pristojni nacionalni organi uskladiti interese imetnikov pravic s potrebo po pospeševanju uvedbe trgovanja s spektrom in prožnejši uporabi spektra s splošnimi odobritvami, če je to mogoče.
Minor amendments to rights and obligations are those amendments which are mainly administrative, do not change the substantial nature of the general authorisations and the individual rights of use and thus cannot cause any comparative advantage to the other undertakings.
Manjše spremembe pravic in obveznosti so tiste spremembe, ki so večinoma upravne, ne spreminjajo narave splošnih odobritev in individualnih pravic uporabe in zato ne morejo povzročiti primerjalne prednosti do drugih podjetij.
Competent national authorities should have the power to ensure effective use of spectrum and, where spectrum resources are left unused, to take action to prevent anti-competitive hoarding, which can hinder new market entry.
Pristojni nacionalni organi bi morali biti pooblaščeni za zagotovitev učinkovite uporabe spektra in v primeru neizkoriščenega spektra za sprejetje ukrepov za preprečevanje protikonkurenčnega kopičenja, ki lahko ovira nove vstope na trg.