natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
a ‘recognised organisation-related detention’ means that the ship’s recognised organisation that carried out the relevant survey or that issued a certificate had a responsibility in relation to the deficiencies which, alone or in combination, led to detention, as defined in the applicable instructions of the relevant port State control scheme;
„zadržanje, povezano s priznano organizacijo“ pomeni, da je priznana organizacija ladje, ki je izvedla zadevni nadzor ali izdala spričevalo, odgovorna za pomanjkljivosti, ki so same ali skupaj z drugimi dejavniki privedle do zadržanja, kot je opredeljeno v veljavnih navodilih zadevnega sistema inšpekcije za varnost plovbe;
a ‘marine casualty’ means a marine casualty as defined in IMO resolution A. 849(20).
„pomorska nezgoda“ pomeni pomorsko nezgodo, kot je opredeljena v Resoluciji IMO A. 849(20);
The criteria to be followed in order to decide when the performance of an organisation acting on behalf of a flag State can be considered an unacceptable threat to safety and the environment are set out in Annex I.
Merila za odločanje, kdaj lahko učinkovitost organizacije, ki deluje v imenu države zastave, pomeni nesprejemljivo nevarnost za varnost in okolje, so določena v Prilogi I.
The Commission, in determining whether an organisation acting on behalf of a flag State must be considered an unacceptable threat to safety and the environment may, in addition to the criteria set out in Annex I, take into account the cases that come to its knowledge where:
Komisija lahko pri ugotavljanju, ali organizacija, ki deluje v imenu države zastave, pomeni nesprejemljivo nevarnost za varnost in okolje, poleg meril, določenih v Prilogi I, upošteva tudi primere, s katerimi je seznanjena, če:
it has been proven in a court of law or in an arbitration procedure that a marine casualty involving a ship in the class of a recognised organisation has been caused by a wilful act or omission or gross negligence of such recognised organisation, its bodies, employees, agents or others who act on its behalf; and
je bilo na sodišču ali v arbitražnem postopku dokazano, da je do pomorske nezgode, v kateri je bila udeležena ladja iz razreda priznane organizacije, prišlo zaradi namernega dejanja, opustitve ali velike malomarnosti priznane organizacije, njenih organov, zaposlenih, predstavnikov ali drugih, ki delujejo v njenem imenu, in
it can be considered, based on the information available to the Commission, that such wilful act, omission or gross negligence has been due to shortcomings in the organisation’s structure, procedures and/or internal control.
se glede na podatke, ki so na voljo Komisiji, lahko šteje, da je takšno namerno dejanje, opustitev ali velika malomarnost posledica pomanjkljivosti v strukturi organizacije, postopkih in/ali notranjem nadzoru.
The Commission shall take into account the gravity of the case, and shall seek to determine whether recurrence or any other circumstances reveal the organisation’s failure to remedy the shortcomings referred to in paragraph 1 and improve its performance.
Komisija upošteva težo primera in si prizadeva ugotoviti, ali ponovna nezgoda ali katera koli druga okoliščina kaže, da organizacija ni uspela odpraviti pomanjkljivosti iz odstavka 1 in izboljšati svoje učinkovitosti.
Three years after the entry into force of this Decision, the Commission shall evaluate the criteria set out in Annex I.
Komisija tri leta po začetku veljavnosti te odločbe oceni merila, določena v Prilogi I.
Where appropriate it shall, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 7(2) of Directive 94/57/EC, amend Annex I in order to:
Komisija po potrebi v skladu s postopkom iz člena 7(2) Direktive 94/57/ES spremeni Prilogo I, da bi:
adjust the said criteria to ensure their usefulness and fairness;
prilagodila navedena merila ter zagotovila njihovo uporabnost in poštenost;
define thresholds triggering the application of the measures provided for in Articles 9(1) and 10(2) of the said Directive.
opredelila mejne primere, za katere se uporabljajo ukrepi iz členov 9(1) in 10(2) navedene direktive.
In submitting reports to the Commission and to the other Member States in accordance with Article 12 of Directive 94/57/EC, the Member States shall make use of the harmonised form set out in Annex II.
Države članice pri pošiljanju poročil Komisiji in drugim državam članicam v skladu s členom 12 Direktive 94/57/ES uporabijo enotni obrazec iz Priloge II.
PORT STATE CONTROL
INŠPEKCIJA ZA VARNOST PLOVBE
Number of recognised organisation-related detentions in relation to total inspections over a three-year period
Število zadržanj, povezanih s priznano organizacijo, glede na skupno število inšpekcijskih pregledov v obdobju treh let
n number of recognised organisation-related detentions
n število zadržanj, povezanih s priznano organizacijo
threshold low to medium performance
prag nizke do srednje učinkovitosti
threshold medium to high performance
prag srednje do visoke učinkovitosti
N total number of inspections (minimum number = 60)
N skupno število inšpekcijskih pregledov (najmanjše število = 60)
p fixed yardstick = 0,02
p stalno merilo = 0,02
z statistical significance factor = 1,645
z koeficient statistične značilnosti = 1,645
Paris MOU
Pariški MOU
6 points
6 točk
0 points
0 točk
US Coast Guard [1]
Obalna straža Združenih držav [1]
3 point
3 točke
Tokyo MOU
Tokijski MOU
If Uh < 0, then it is considered that Uh = 0.
Če je Uh < 0, se šteje, da je Uh = 0.
If n = 0, then 0 points will be given, irrespective of the Uh value.
Če je n = 0, se ne dodeli nobene točke, ne glede na vrednost Uh.
Percentage of recognised organisation-related detentions in relation to total number of inspections
Odstotek zadržanj, povezanih s priznano organizacijo, glede na skupno število inšpekcijskih pregledov
Annual — compared to previous three years
Letno – v primerjavi s prejšnjimi tremi leti
increase
porast
unchanged
nespremenjeno
0 point
0 točk
decrease
upad
US Coast Guard [1] When using US Coast Guard data, the total number of distinct vessels arrivals may be considered instead of the total number of inspections if data on the later are not available.
Obalna straža Združenih držav [1] Pri uporabi podatkov Obalne straže Združenih držav se lahko upošteva skupno število prihodov določenih ladij namesto skupnega števila inšpekcijskih pregledov, če podatki o teh niso na voljo.
When a recognised organisation presents a 0 % detention rate for two consecutive periods, it will be considered a positive performance and the same number of points as for a decrease in the detention rates will be given.
Kadar je stopnja zadržanj priznane organizacije 0 % dve obdobji zapored, se to šteje kot pozitivna učinkovitost in dodeli se enako število točk kot za upad stopenj zadržanj.
Number of detentions in relation to total number of inspections over a three-year period
Število zadržanj glede na skupno število inšpekcijskih pregledov v obdobju treh let
n number of detentions
n število zadržanj
threshold low performance
prag nizke učinkovitosti
p fixed yardstick = 0,05
p stalno merilo = 0,05
Two recognised organisation-related detentions of the same ship over the last 12 months (annual; as per Paris MOU, US Coast Guard and Tokyo MOU)
Dve s priznano organizacijo povezani zadržanji iste ladje v zadnjih 12 mesecih (letno; na podlagi Pariškega MOU, Obalne straže Združenih držav in Tokijskega MOU)
Number of cases
Število primerov
points
točke
1 per ship
1 na ladjo
2 per ship
2 na ladjo
3 per ship
3 na ladjo
Two recognised organisation-related detentions of the same ship over the last 24 months (annual, for the last 24 months; as per Paris MOU, US Coast Guard and Tokyo MOU)
Dve s priznano organizacijo povezani zadržanji iste ladje v zadnjih 24 mesecih (letno, za zadnjih 24 mesecev; na podlagi Pariškega MOU, Obalne straže Združenih držav in Tokijskega MOU)
1 point for every ship.
1 točka za vsako ladjo.
Occurrences already counted under 1.4 are excluded.
Primeri, že upoštevani pod točko 1.4, so izključeni.
Three or more recognised organisation-related detentions of the same ship over the last 24 months (annual, for the last 24 months; as per Paris MOU, US Coast Guard and Tokyo MOU)
Tri ali več s priznano organizacijo povezanih zadržanj iste ladje v zadnjih 24 mesecih (letno, za zadnjih 24 mesecev; na podlagi Pariškega MOU, Obalne straže Združenih držav in Tokijskega MOU)
3 points for every ship — adding to points allocated under 1.4 or 1.5
3 točke za vsako ladjo – prištejejo se točkam, dodeljenim pod točko 1.4 ali 1.5.
Difference in performance for black listed and white listed flags (recognised organisation-related detentions — rate as per Paris MOU)
Razlika v učinkovitosti zastav na črni ali beli listi (zadržanja, povezana s priznano organizacijo – stopnja na podlagi Pariškega MOU)
Percentage point difference
Razlika v odstotnih točkah
+ 3 points
+ 3 točke
+ 2 points
+ 2 točki
+ 1 point
+ 1 točka
1 point– erence in performance for black listed and white listed flags (recognised organisation-related detentions — rate as per Paris MOU)
1 točka– a v učinkovitosti zastav na črni ali beli listi (zadržanja, povezana s priznano organizacijo – stopnja na podlagi Pariškega MOU)
Where there is not sufficient data for the calculation of the difference in performance for a recognised organisation, then 0 points will be attributed.
Kadar za izračun razlike v učinkovitosti za priznano organizacijo ni zadostnih podatkov, se ne dodeli nobene točke.
REPORTS FROM MEMBER STATES
Poročila držav članic
1 point for every reported case up to a maximum of 3 points.
1 točka za vsak sporočen primer do največ 3 točk.
When using US Coast Guard data, the total number of distinct vessels arrivals may be considered instead of the total number of inspections if data on the later are not available.
Pri uporabi podatkov Obalne straže Združenih držav se lahko upošteva skupno število prihodov določenih ladij namesto skupnega števila inšpekcijskih pregledov, če podatki o teh niso na voljo.
in accordance with Article 12 of Council Directive 94/57/EC
v skladu s členom 12 Direktive Sveta 94/57/ES
‘In exercising their obligations as port States, Member States shall report to the Commission and other Member States, and inform the flag State concerned, the discovery of the issue of valid certificates by organisations acting on behalf of a flag States to a ships which does not fulfil the relevant requirements of the international conventions, or of any failure of a ship carrying a valid class certificate and relating to items covered by that certificate.
„Pri uresničevanju pravic in dolžnosti inšpekcijskega pregleda, ki pripadajo državam pristanišča, države članice poročajo Komisiji in drugim državam članicam ter obvestijo zadevno državo zastave o odkritju veljavnih spričeval, ki so jih izdale organizacije, delujoče v imenu države zastave, za ladjo, ki ne izpolnjuje ustreznih predpisov mednarodnih konvencij, ali o katerih koli pomanjkljivostih ladje, ki ima veljavno klasifikacijsko spričevalo, v zvezi s postavkami, za katere to spričevalo velja.
Only cases of ships representing a serious threat to safety and the environment or showing evidence of particularly negligent behaviour of the organisations shall be reported for the purpose of this Article.
Za namene tega člena se poroča samo o tistih ladjah, ki predstavljajoresnonevarnost za varnost in okolje ali kažejo znake posebno malomarnega ravnanja organizacij.
The recognised organisation concerned shall be advised of the case at the time of the initial inspection so that it can take appropriate follow-up action immediately.’
Zadevna priznana organizacija je obveščena o primeru v trenutku začetnega inšpekcijskega pregleda, da lahko takoj sprejme ustrezne nadaljnje ukrepe.“
For the purpose of identifying the cases in which failures by the recognised organisation (hereinafter RO) to detect serious defects in the conditions of the surveyed vessels shall be reported to the Commission, the other Members States and the flag State concerned, the following criteria shall be applied:
Za določitev primerov, v katerih se Komisiji, drugim državam članicam in zadevni državi zastave poroča, da priznana organizacija (v nadaljevanju PO) ni uspela odkriti resnih okvar nadzorovanih plovil, se uporabljajo naslednja merila:
the failure is related to statutory surveys performed by the RO and is manifestly due to gross negligence, recklessness or omission by the RO,
neuspeh je povezan s predpisanimi inšpekcijskimi pregledi, ki jih je izvedla PO, in je očitno posledica velike malomarnosti, brezbrižnosti ali opustitve PO;
defects not properly addressed by the RO involve structural elements of the hull and/or machinery and/or safety equipment and are serious enough to result in:
okvare, ki jih PO ni ustrezno obravnavala, so na strukturnih elementih trupa in/ali motorja in/ali varnostne opreme in so dovolj resne, da lahko vodijo v:
suspension, withdrawal or conditional endorsement of the safety certificate by the flag State; or
začasni ali stalni odvzem ali pogojno potrditev varnostnega spričevala s strani države zastave, ali
prevention of operation under Council Directive 1999/35/EC [1] or a detention order under Council Directive 95/21/EC [2] being issued by the host or the port State where deficiencies cannot be repaired in less than five days.
prepoved delovanja v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 1999/35/ES [1] ali odločbo o zadržanju v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 95/21/ES [2], ki jo izda država gostiteljica ali država pristanišča, če pomanjkljivosti ni mogoče odpraviti v manj kot petih dneh.
The report shall include an account of the case detailing why the above criteria were considered met.
V poročilu je pri opisu primera tudi navedeno, zakaj se šteje, da so bila navedena merila izpolnjena.
The following evidence material should also be attached where applicable:
Kadar je to ustrezno, se priložijo naslednja dokazila:
copy of the safety certificates;
kopija varnostnih spričeval;
documents related to the statutory work performed by the RO before the defects were detected;
dokumenti v zvezi s predpisanim delom, ki ga je izvedla PO pred odkritjem okvar;
evidence of the action taken by the flag State, port State or host State;
dokazila o ukrepih države zastave, države pristanišča ali države gostiteljice,
copy of the class survey report issued as a result of the class attending the vessel after the defects were detected;
kopija poročila o predpisanem pregledu, ki opravi klasifikacijski zavod po odkritju okvar na plovilu;
digital photographs of the defective areas.
digitalne fotografije okvarjenih delov.
The attached format shall be used for reporting.
Za poročanje se uporabi priloženi obrazec.
The report shall be forwarded to the European Commission, EMSA and all Member States.
Poročilo se pošlje Evropski komisiji, Evropski agenciji za pomorsko varnost in vsem državam članicam.
submitted by (State reporting authority)
predložil (navedite poročevalni organ države)
I. General particulars
I. Splošne navedbe
IMO number:
Številka IMO
Recognised organisation:
Priznana organizacija
Type of inspection:
Vrsta inšpekcijskega pregleda
Port of inspection:
Pristanišče inšpekcijskega pregleda
Date of inspection:
datum inšpekcijskega pregleda
Follow up action:
Nadaljnji ukrepi
Duration of detention:
Trajanje zadržanja
Duration of the prevention of operation:
Trajanje prepovedi delovanja:
Detailed account of the inspection and/or port State control inspection report
Podrobne navedbe inšpekcijskega pregleda in/ali poročilo o inšpekcijskem pregledu inšpekcije o varnosti plovbe
Considerations on the behaviour of the recognised organisation
Pripombe k ravnanju priznane organizacije
Follow-up action by the inspecting State, the flag State and the recognised organisation
Nadaljnji ukrepi države, ki izvaja pregled, države zastave in priznane organizacije
V. Documentary evidence provided
V. Predložena dokazila
OJ L 138, 1.6.1999, p. 1.
UL L 138, 1.6.1999, str. 1.
on a Community financial contribution towards Trust Fund 911100MTF/INT/003/EEC (TFEU 970089129) to assist the campaign against foot-and-mouth disease outside the Community
o finančnem prispevku Skupnosti k Odškodninskemu skladu 911100MTF/INT/003/EGS (TFEU 970089129) za pomoč pri boju proti slinavki in parkljevki zunaj Skupnosti
Having regard to Council Decision 90/424/EEC of 26 June 1990 on expenditure in the veterinary field [1], and in particular Article 13 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 90/424/EGS z dne 26. junija 1990 o odhodkih na področju veterine [1] in zlasti člena 13 Odločbe,
That Decision provides that any measure decided by the Community to assist the campaign against foot-and-mouth disease outside the Community, in particular with the view to protect areas at risk within the Community, may receive a Community financial contribution.
Navedena odločba določa, da finančni prispevek Skupnosti lahko prejme kateri koli ukrep, ki ga določi Skupnost za boj proti slinavki in parkljevki zunaj Skupnosti, zlasti za zaščito ogroženih območij znotraj Skupnosti.
In the context of major epidemics of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in the late 1950s both within the Community and in neighbouring countries, the European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease (EUFMD) was founded within the framework of the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) of the United Nations.
Zaradi hude epidemije slinavke in parkljevke (FMD) v poznih petdesetih letih prejšnjega stoletja v Skupnosti in sosednjih državah je bila ustanovljena Evropska komisija za obvladovanje slinavke in parkljevke (EUFMD) v okviru Organizacije Združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo (FAO).
In the 1960s, due to increased threats from the introduction of exotic strains of FMD into Europe, the Member Countries of the EUFMD were called to establish a Trust Fund aimed at emergency measures to be carried out in the Balkans, the main entrance route of the disease.
V šestdesetih letih prejšnjega stoletja so bile države članice EUFMD zaradi vse večje nevarnosti vnosa eksotičnih sevov FMD v Evropo pozvane, da ustanovijo odškodninski sklad za nujne ukrepe na Balkanu kot največji vstopni poti te bolezni.
That fund was later divided into Trust Fund 911100MTF/003/EEC supported by those Member Countries that were at the same time Member States of the Community and Trust Fund 909700MTF/004/MUL supported by member countries of EUFMD which at that time were not or are still not Member States of the Community.
Pozneje se je navedeni sklad razdelil na Odškodninski sklad 911100MTF/003/EGS, ki ga podpirajo tiste države članice, ki so bile hkrati države članice Skupnosti, in Odškodninski sklad 909700MTF/004/MUL, ki ga podpirajo države članice EUFMD, ki takrat niso bile ali še vedno niso države članice Skupnosti.
Article 4 of Council Directive 90/423/EEC [2] provided for the cessation of prophylactic vaccination against FMD throughout the Community in 1991.
Člen 4 Direktive Sveta 90/423/EGS [2] določa ukinitev preventivnega cepljenja proti FMD po vsej Skupnosti v letu 1991.
Council Directive 2003/85/EC of 29 September 2003 on Community measures for the control of foot-and-mouth disease [3] reconfirmed the prohibition of prophylactic vaccination while extending the possibility for the use of emergency vaccination against FMD.
Direktiva Sveta 2003/85/ES z dne 29. septembra 2003 o ukrepih Skupnosti za obvladovanje slinavke in parkljevke [3] je ponovno potrdila prepoved preventivnega cepljenja, hkrati pa razširila možnost uporabe cepljenja proti FMD v nujnih primerih.
A number of outbreaks of FMD reported since 1992, in particular in parts of the Community adjacent to endemically infected third countries, and a major epidemic in certain Member States in 2001 necessitate a high level of disease awareness and preparedness, including international cooperation.
Številni izbruhi FMD, prijavljeni od leta 1992, zlasti v delih Skupnosti, ki mejijo na endemično okužene tretje države, in huda epidemija v nekaterih državah članicah leta 2001 zahtevajo visoko stopnjo ozaveščenosti glede bolezni in pripravljenosti, vključno z mednarodnim sodelovanjem.
In addition, outbreaks and, in some cases, severe epidemics have been recorded in third countries neighbouring the Member States during recent years which are liable to threaten the health status of Community susceptible livestock.
Poleg tega so bili v zadnjih letih v tretjih državah, ki mejijo na države članice, prijavljeni izbruhi, v nekaterih primerih pa hude epidemije, ki lahko ogrozijo zdravstveno stanje dovzetne živine v Skupnosti.
The Community and the United Nations signed on 29 April 2003 a Financial and Administrative Framework Agreement, which provided the enabling environment for the Agreement between the Commission of the European Communities and the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, signed on 17 July 2003.
Skupnost in Združeni narodi so 29. aprila 2003 podpisali Finančni in upravni okvirni sporazum, ki je omogočil sporazum med Komisijo Evropskih skupnosti in Organizacijo Združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo, podpisan 17. julija 2003.
In accordance with Commission Decision 2005/436/EC of 13 June 2005 on Community cooperation with the Food and Agriculture Organisation with particular regard to activities carried out by the European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease [4] the Commission concluded the ‘Implementing Agreement MTF/INT/003/EEC911100 (TFEU970089129) on EC Funded Permanent Activities carried out by the FAO European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease’ which was signed on 1 September 2005 and operated from 1 January 2005 until 31 December 2008.
V skladu s Sklepom Komisije 2005/436/ES z dne 13. junija 2005 o sodelovanju Skupnosti z Organizacijo Združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo zlasti glede dejavnosti, ki jih izvaja Evropska komisija za obvladovanje slinavke in parkljevke [4], je Komisija sklenila „Izvedbeni sporazum MTF/INT/003/EGS911100 (TFEU970089129) o stalnih aktivnostih, ki jih financira ES in izvaja Evropska komisija FAO za obvladovanje slinavke in parkljevke“, ki je bil podpisan 1. septembra 2005 in se je uporabljal od 1. januarja 2005 do 31. decembra 2008.
It is appropriate to renew that Implementing Agreement and fix the Community contribution to the Trust Fund 911100MTF/INT/003/EEC.
Primerno je obnoviti navedeni izvedbeni sporazum in določiti prispevek Skupnosti k Odškodninskemu skladu 911100MTF/INT/003/EGS.
In view of the successive enlargements of the European Union of 2004 and 2007, it is appropriate that that Community contribution be fixed at a maximum level of EUR 8000000 for a period of four years.
Glede na zaporedni širitvi Evropske unije v letih 2004 in 2007 je prispevek Skupnosti primerno določiti v znesku največ 8000000 EUR za obdobje štirih let.
The balance of Trust Fund 911100MTF/INT/003/EEC (TFEU 970089129) (the Trust Fund) as at 31 December 2008 shall be fixed at EUR 677855.
Stanje Odškodninskega sklada 911100MTF/INT/003/EGS (TFEU 970089129) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Odškodninski sklad) z dne 31. decembra 2008 je določeno pri 677855 EUR.
The financial contribution from the Community to the Trust Fund shall be set at a maximum of EUR 8000000 for a period of four years from 1 January 2009.
Finančni prispevek Skupnosti k Odškodninskemu skladu se določi v znesku največ 8000000 EUR za obdobje štirih let od 1. januarja 2009.
The first instalment of the amount referred to in paragraph 2 for the year 2009 shall be made up of:
Prvi obrok zneska iz odstavka 2 za leto 2009 se sestavi iz:
the balance referred to in paragraph 1;
stanja iz odstavka 1;
a Community contribution of the amount necessary to bring the total amount of the Trust Fund to an equivalent in USD of EUR 2000000.
prispevka Skupnosti, potrebnega za skupni znesek, enakovreden 2000000 EUR v USD.