natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The competent authorities of Kazakhstan have not demonstrated that they exercise an appropriate oversight of this carrier in accordance with their obligations under the Chicago Convention.
Pristojni organi Kazahstana niso dokazali, da so opravili ustrezen nadzor nad tem prevoznikom v skladu s svojimi obveznostmi iz Čikaške konvencije.
In view of the above, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Sayat Air does not meet the relevant safety standards and should therefore be included in Annex A.
Glede na navedeno se na podlagi splošnih meril ocenjuje, da prevoznik Sayat Air ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov in ga je zato treba vključiti v Prilogo A.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Scat certified in Kazakhstan.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih prevoznika Scat, certificiranega v Kazahstanu.
In particular, aircraft of type Yak-42 with registration marks UP-Y4205 is not equipped with TAWS (E-GPWS) as required by ICAO provisions.
Zlasti zrakoplov vrste Yak-42 z registrsko oznako UP-Y4205 ni opremljen s TAWS (E-GPWS), kot zahtevajo določbe ICAO.
These deficiencies have been identified by an ECAC state during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [12].
Te pomanjkljivosti je med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [12], odkrila ena od držav ECAC.
The Commission, having regard to the above mentioned deficiencies, has entered into consultation with the competent authorities of Kazakhstan, expressing serious concerns about the safety of the operations of Scat and asking for clarifications regarding the actions undertaken by the competent authorities to respond to these deficiencies.
Komisija je ob upoštevanju navedenih pomanjkljivosti začela posvetovanja s pristojnimi organi Kazahstana, na katerih je izrazila resne pomisleke glede varnosti dejavnosti prevoznika Scat ter zahtevala pojasnila v zvezi z ukrepi, ki so jih pristojni organi sprejeli v odgovor na te pomanjkljivosti.
The competent authorities of Kazakhstan provided evidence that they removed from the register the aircraft of type Yak-42 with registration marks UP-Y4205.
Pristojni organi Kazahstana so predložili dokaze, da so zrakoplov vrste Yak-42 z registrsko oznako UP-Y4205 umaknili iz registra.
Scat requested to be heard by the Air Safety Committee and, during its hearing on 24 March 2009, confirmed that this aircraft was not operated anymore.
Prevoznik Scat je zaprosil za zaslišanje pred Odborom za varnost v zračnem prometu in med zaslišanjem dne 24. marca 2009 potrdil, da ta zrakoplov ne opravlja več letov.
In view of that, the Commission considers that no further action is needed with regard to this carrier.
Glede na to Komisija meni, da nadaljnji ukrepi v zvezi s tem prevoznikom niso potrebni.
Overall safety oversight of air carriers from the Republic of Kazakhstan
Splošen nadzor nad varnostjo letalskih prevoznikov iz Republike Kazahstan
The Commission drew the attention of the competent authorities of Kazakhstan to the fact that the monitoring of the performance of a number of other air carriers licensed in Kazakhstan keeps showing disquieting results in ramp inspections.
Komisija je pristojne organe Kazahstana opozorila, da rezultati preverjanj na ploščadi pri spremljanju delovanja številnih drugih letalskih prevoznikov, ki jim je bila v Kazahstanu izdana licenca, še vedno niso zadovoljivi.
The competent authorities of Kazakhstan were invited to provide clarifications and to take the necessary measures, where appropriate.
Pristojni organi Kazahstana so bili pozvani, da to pojasnijo in po potrebi sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe.
The competent authorities of Kazakhstan communicated a series of enforcement measures taken on a number of Kazakh carriers.
Pristojni organi Kazahstana so sporočili vrsto izvršilnih ukrepov, ki so jih sprejeli v zvezi s številnimi kazahstanskimi prevozniki.
These authorities informed in particular that they restricted on 4 February 2009 the operations of Investavia, Skybus and Aytirau Aye Zholy to outside the European airspace.
Ti organi so sporočili zlasti, da so 4. februarja 2009 omejili dejavnosti prevoznikov Investavia, Skybus in Aytirau Aye Zholy na območje zunaj evropskega zračnega prostora.
The Commission will launch urgent consultations with the Kazakh authorities and will initiate the procedure provided in Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 in relation to these carriers.
Komisija bo začela nujna posvetovanja s kazahstanskimi organi, v zvezi s temi prevozniki pa bo sprožila postopek iz člena 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 2111/2005.
The Commission strongly requests the competent authorities of Kazakhstan to increase their efforts to reform the civil aviation system and strengthen the safety oversight of all carriers certified in this country.
Komisija od pristojnih organov Kazahstana odločno zahteva, da povečajo svoja prizadevanja za reformo sistema civilnega letalstva in okrepijo nadzor nad varnostjo vseh prevoznikov, certificiranih v tej državi.
The Commission will continue the consultations with these authorities to evaluate the situation of Kazakh carriers and is ready to assess, together with the Member States, all evidence provided in a timely fashion in that respect.
Komisija se bo še naprej posvetovala s temi organi, da bi ocenila stanje kazahstanskih prevoznikov, in je pripravljena skupaj z državami članicami oceniti vse pravočasno predložene dokaze v zvezi s tem.
Orient Thai Airlines and One Two Go Airlines
Orient Thai Airlines in One Two Go Airlines
Following the accident of One Two Go flight OG 269 in Phuket on 16 September 2007, which resulted in the total loss of the aircraft, an MD-80, and to 90 fatalities, including many European passengers, the Commission started the consultation with the competent authorities of Thailand in charge of the safety oversight of this carrier.
Po nesreči leta OG 269 prevoznika One Two Go v Phuketu 16. septembra 2007, pri kateri je bil popolnoma uničen zrakoplov vrste MD-80 in je življenje izgubilo 90 ljudi, vključno s številnimi evropskimi potniki, je Komisija začela posvetovanja s pristojnimi organi Tajske, odgovornimi za nadzor nad varnostjo tega prevoznika.
The Commission sent on 5 March 2009 a letter to these carriers pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005.
Komisija je 5. marca 2009 tema dvema prevoznikoma poslala dopis v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 2111/2005.
The competent authorities of Thailand (the Thai Department of Civil Aviation – Thai DCA) informed the Commission that investigations conducted after the accident revealed that both Orient Thai and its subsidiary One Two Go violated the law on air navigation, in particular by the falsification of Pilot Proficiency Checks of nine pilots of the carriers.
Pristojni organi Tajske (tajski oddelek za civilno letalstvo) so Komisijo obvestili, da so preiskave, ki so bile opravljene po nesreči, pokazale, da sta prevoznik Orient Thai in njegova hčerinska družba One Two Go kršila predpise o zračni plovbi, predvsem s ponaredbo preverjanj usposobljenosti za osem pilotov prevoznikov.
Consequently, the Thai DCA suspended the MD-80 operations of One Two Go and Orient Thai and requested these carriers carry out a series of corrective actions.
Zato je tajski oddelek za civilno letalstvo začasno ukinil lete zrakoplova vrste MD-80 prevoznikov One Two Go in Orient Thai ter od njiju zahteval, da izvedeta vrsto korekcijskih ukrepov.
The Thai DCA has also informed the Commission that it decided on 25 November 2008 to re-activate the AOC of One Two Go.
Poleg tega je tajski oddelek za civilno letalstvo obvestil Komisijo, da se je 25. novembra 2008 odločil ponovno aktivirati spričevalo letalskega prevoznika One Two Go.
Its parent company Orient Thai had already been authorised to restart its operations with aircraft of type MD-80 since 7 October 2008.
Njegova matična družba Orient Thai ima dovoljenje za ponovno opravljanje letov z zrakoplovom vrste MD-80 že od 7. oktobra 2008.
A team of European experts conducted a fact-finding visit to the Kingdom of Thailand from 10 to 13 March 2009 covering the areas of Flight Operations and Flight Crew Licenses, so as to verify the implementation by the air carriers of corrective actions meant to address the safety deficiencies previously identified by the Thai DCA.
Skupina evropskih strokovnjakov je od 10. do 13. marca 2009 v Kraljevini Tajski izvedla obisk za ugotavljanje dejstev na področju letalskih dejavnosti in licenc za letalsko osebje, da bi preverila, če so letalski prevozniki izvedli korekcijske ukrepe za odpravo varnostnih pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je predhodno ugotovil tajski oddelek za civilno letalstvo.
The visiting team could assess that One Two Go does not conduct any aircraft operations.
Skupina, ki je opravila obisk, je lahko ocenila, da prevoznik One Two Go ne opravlja letalskih dejavnosti.
One Two Go is responsible for retailing flights which are actually operated by Orient Thai under a wet-lease agreement, whereby One Two Go is the lessee and Orient Thai the lessor.
Prevoznik One Two Go je odgovoren za trženje letov, ki jih dejansko upravlja prevoznik Orient Thai, na podlagi zakupne pogodbe, pri čemer je One Two Go zakupnik, Orient Thai pa zakupodajalec.
Orient Thai provides aircraft, complete crew, maintenance, and insurance to One Two Go.
Prevoznik Orient Thai prevozniku One Two Go zagotovi zrakoplov, celotno posadko, vzdrževanje in zavarovanje.
All staff involved in Orient Thai operations on behalf of One Two Go are employed by Orient Thai.
Celotno osebje, vključeno v dejavnosti prevoznika Orient Thai v imenu prevoznika One Two Go, je zaposleno pri prevozniku Orient Thai.
The report of the fact-finding visit also shows that corrective actions have been taken to date by the carrier Orient Thai, as well as measures taken by the Thai DCA to resolve the safety deficiencies detected previously.
Iz poročila o obisku za ugotavljanje dejstev je razvidno tudi, da je do zdaj prevoznik Orient Thai sprejel korekcijske ukrepe, tajski oddelek za civilno letalstvo pa ukrepe za odpravo predhodno ugotovljenih varnostnih pomanjkljivosti.
The Commission will closely monitor the safety situation of Orient Thai.
Komisija bo natančno spremljala stanje glede varnosti prevoznika Orient Thai.
To this end, the Thai DCA should provide the Commission, within a period not exceeding two months, with all the necessary information regarding the effectiveness of the said measures.
Zato mora tajski oddelek za civilno letalstvo Komisiji v obdobju, ki ni daljše od dveh mesecev, predložiti vse potrebne informacije glede učinkovitosti navedenih ukrepov.
On 19 March 2009, the Thai DCA informed the Commission that One Two Go has the intention to conduct own air operations by the month of July 2009.
Tajski oddelek za civilno letalstvo je 19. marca 2009 obvestil Komisijo, da namerava prevoznik One Two Go en: julija 2009 začeti opravljati lastne letalske dejavnosti.
However, the report of the EU team shows that the Thai DCA granted One Two Go an AOC, despite the fact that it was not in a position to properly assess the capability of the company to safely conduct aircraft operations, since this carrier never produced the detailed evidence documents, requested under Thai Regulations which implement ICAO standards.
Vendar je iz poročila skupine EU razvidno, da je tajski direktorat za civilno letalstvo letalskemu prevozniku One Two Go dodelil spričevalo kljub temu, ni mogel ustrezno oceniti, ali je prevoznik spodoben varno opravljati letalske dejavnosti, saj ta prevoznik ni predloži podrobne dokazne dokumentacije, ki je v skladu s tajskimi predpisi potrebna za izvajanje standardov ICAO.
The Thai DCA also announced its intention to revoke the AOC of One Two Go on 29 March 2009; however, the carrier would continue chartering scheduled flights from Orient Thai by virtue of its Air Operator Licence.
Poleg tega je tajski direktorat za civilno letalstvo 29. marca 2009 sporočil, da namerava razveljaviti spričevalo letalskega prevoznika One Two Go, vendar bi imel prevoznik na podlagi svoje licence letalskega prevoznika še naprej v zakupu redne lete prevoznika Orient Thai.
In view of the above, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that the carrier One Two Go does not meet the relevant safety standards.
Glede na navedeno se na podlagi splošnih meril ocenjuje, da prevoznik One Two Go ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov.
This carrier should be subject to an operating ban and therefore included in Annex A.
Zanj bi morala veljati prepoved opravljanja letov in ga je zato treba vključiti v Prilogo A.
Air carriers from the Republic of Benin
Letalski prevozniki iz Republike Benin
There is verified evidence of lack of ability of the authorities responsible for the oversight of air carriers licensed in Benin to address safety deficiencies, as demonstrated by the results of the audit of Benin carried out by ICAO in the framework of the Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme (USOAP) in March 2007.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o pomanjkanju sposobnosti organov, pristojnih za nadzor nad letalskimi prevozniki, ki jim je bila v Beninu izdana licenca, za odpravo varnostnih pomanjkljivosti, kar je razvidno iz izsledkov revizije, ki jo je marca 2007 v Beninu opravil ICAO v okviru revizijskega programa splošnega pregleda varnostnih standardov (Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme – USOAP).
This audit reported a large number of significant deficiencies with regard to the capability of the civil aviation authorities of Benin to discharge their air safety oversight responsibilities.
Pri tej reviziji so bile ugotovljene številne resne pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z zmožnostjo organov civilnega letalstva Benina za izvajanje njihovih pristojnosti za nadzor nad varnostjo v zračnem prometu.
At the time of the completion of the ICAO audit, 80,22 % of ICAO standards were not implemented.
Ob zaključku svoje revizije je ICAO ugotovil, da se več kot 80,22 % standardov ICAO ne izvaja.
On certain critical elements such as the provision for qualified technical personnel, more than 98 % of ICAO standards were not effectively implemented.
Na nekaterih ključnih področjih, kot je zagotovitev usposobljenega tehničnega osebja, več kot 98 % standardov ICAO ni bilo učinkovito izvedenih.
Regarding the resolution of safety concerns, more than 93 % of ICAO standards were not effectively implemented.
Glede odpravljanja varnostnih pomanjkljivosti pa ni bilo učinkovito izvedenih več kot 93 % standardov ICAO.
There is evidence of insufficient ability from the competent authorities of Benin to remedy effectively the non-compliance findings made by ICAO, as demonstrated by the fact that ICAO considers in its final report dated December 2007 that a significant part of the corrective actions proposed or implemented by these authorities do not actually address the deficiencies observed.
Obstajajo dokazi o pomanjkanju sposobnosti pristojnih organov Benina za učinkovito odpravo kršitev, ki jih je ugotovil ICAO, na kar kaže dejstvo, da ICAO v svojem končnem poročilu iz decembra 2007 meni, da velik del korekcijskih ukrepov, ki so jih predlagali ali jih izvajajo ti organi, dejansko ne obravnava ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti.
In the area of aircraft operations in particular, 50 % of the actions proposed by Benin were not considered as fully acceptable by ICAO.
Predvsem na področju letalskih dejavnosti 50 % ukrepov, ki jih je predlagal Benin, po mnenju ICAO ni bilo v celoti sprejemljivih.
The Commission, having regard to the ICAO final report, has entered into consultation with the competent authorities of Benin, expressing serious concerns about the safety of the operations of air carriers licensed in the country, and asking for clarifications regarding the actions undertaken by the competent authorities of Benin to respond to ICAO findings and observations on the acceptability of the remedial actions.
Komisija je ob upoštevanju končnega poročila ICAO začela posvetovanja s pristojnimi organi Benina, na katerih je izrazila resne pomisleke glede varnosti dejavnosti letalskih prevoznikov z dovoljenji v tej državi ter zahtevala pojasnila v zvezi z ukrepi, ki so jih pristojni organi Benina sprejeli v odgovor na ugotovitve ICAO ter pripombe glede sprejemljivosti korekcijskih ukrepov.
During the hearing before the Air Safety Committee on 25 March 2009, the competent authorities of Benin indicated that the implementation of the corrective actions whose completion was expected in 2008 has been actually postponed to August/December 2009.
Med zaslišanjem pred Odborom za varnost v zračnem prometu 25. marca 2009 so pristojni organi Benina navedli, da se je izvajanje korekcijskih ukrepov, ki naj bi se zaključilo leta 2008, dejansko prestavilo na avgust/december 2009.
The documentation presented by the competent authorities of Benin provides evidence that the AOC issued to carriers certified in Benin do not comply with ICAO standards for international flights, which confirms that the ICAO findings made have not been yet effectively addressed.
Dokumentacija, ki so jo predložili pristojni organi Benina, dokazuje, da spričevala letalskega prevoznika, izdana prevoznikom, certificiranim v Beninu, ne izpolnjujejo standardov ICAO za mednarodne lete, kar potrjuje, da se ugotovitve ICAO še ne obravnavajo učinkovito.
A review of the situation of the AOCs and attached operations specifications of the air carriers Aero Benin, Africa Airways, Benin Golf Air, Benin Littoral Airways, Cotair, Royal Air and Trans Air Benin reveals serious concerns.
Pregled stanja spričeval ter priloženih specifikacij dejavnosti letalskih prevoznikov Aero Benin, Africa Airways, Benin Golf Air, Benin Littoral Airways, Cotair, Royal Air in Trans Air Benin povzroča resne pomisleke.
The AOC of Africa Airways was not provided.
Spričevalo letalskega prevoznika Africa Airways ni bilo predloženo.
The other AOCs do not mention the applicable regulations used as a basis for the certification, and the area of operations permits worldwide operations although the competent authorities of Benin affirm that these are limited to Benin and/or the sub-region.
Druga spričevala letalskega prevoznika ne navajajo veljavnih predpisov, ki so bili uporabljeni kot podlaga za certificiranje, področje dejavnosti pa omogoča opravljanje letov po celem svetu, čeprav pristojni organi Benina trdijo, da je to omejeno na Benin in/ali podregijo.
Furthermore, the operations of Aero Benin, Benin Golf Air, Benin Littoral Airways, Cotair and Trans Air Benin appear to be limited to visual flight rules (VFR), which would be inadequate to operate safely in Europe, and do not include the necessary specific authorisations RVSM, RNAV and RNP, as appropriate for the navigation into European airspace.
Poleg tega se zdi, da je opravljanje letov prevoznikov Aero Benin, Benin Golf Air, Benin Littoral Airways, Cotair in Trans Air Benin omejeno na pravila vizualnega letenja (VFR), s katerimi ni mogoče zagotoviti varnega opravljanja letov v Evropi, ter ne vključuje ustreznih posebnih dovoljenj RVSM, RNAV in RNP, ki so potrebna za zračno plovbo v evropskem zračnem prostoru.
The competent authorities of Benin have indicated that they have limited the validity of the AOC to 6 months and intend to clarify the situation rapidly.
Pristojni organi Benina so navedli, da so omejili veljavnost spričevala letalskega prevoznika na šest mesecev in da nameravajo stanje hitro pojasniti.
The Commission considers that, pending the expected re-certification of these carriers in full compliance with ICAO standards, on the basis of the common criteria, they should be subject to an operating ban and therefore included in Annex A.
Komisija na podlagi splošnih meril meni, da mora za te prevoznike do pričakovanega ponovnega certificiranja, ki bi v celoti upoštevalo standarde ICAO, veljati prepoved opravljanja letov in jih je zato treba vključiti v Prilogo A.
The carrier Alafia Jet requested to be heard by the Air Safety Committee; it was so given the opportunity to make oral presentations to the Air Safety Committee on 24 March 2009 and transmitted documentation regarding its operations in writing.
Prevoznik Alafia Jet je zaprosil za zaslišanje pred Odborom za varnost v zračnem prometu, tako je imel 24. marca 2009 možnost ustne predstavitve pred Odborom za varnost v zračnem prometu in predložitve pisne dokumentacije v zvezi s svojimi dejavnostmi.
The carrier stated during its presentation that it operates flights into the European Union limited to on-demand emergency medical services, and provided information on a series of actions it has undertaken to respond to the deficiencies identified by France during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [13].
Prevoznik je v svoji predstavitvi navedel, da je njegovo opravljanje letov v Evropsko unijo omejeno na nujne zdravstvene storitve na zahtevo, ter predložil informacije o številnih ukrepih, ki jih je sprejel v odgovor na pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi v okviru programa SAFA [13], odkrila Francija.
However, the repetition of significant safety deficiencies during ramp checks on aircraft operated into the Community indicates that there are systemic safety deficiencies affecting the operations of that carrier.
Vendar ponavljanje večjih varnostnih pomanjkljivosti, odkritih med preverjanji na ploščadi, opravljenimi na zrakoplovu, ki je letel v Skupnost, kažejo na sistemske varnostne pomanjkljivosti, ki vplivajo na dejavnosti navedenega prevoznika.
The actions taken by the company to date have not been able to remedy these deficiencies.
Z ukrepi, ki jih je prevoznik do zdaj sprejel, teh pomanjkljivosti ni bilo mogoče odpraviti.
Taking into account the numerous and repeated safety deficiencies detected during ramp checks of aircraft operated by Alafia Jet and the insufficient ability of the competent authorities of Benin to exercise appropriately oversight of carriers certified in Benin, the Commission considers that the continuation of operations of the carrier Alafia Jet into the Community should not be permitted.
Ob upoštevanju številnih in ponavljajočih se varnostnih pomanjkljivosti, odkritih med preverjanji na ploščadi, opravljenimi na zrakoplovu, ki ga upravlja prevoznik Alafia Jet, ter nesposobnosti pristojnih organov Benina za ustrezen nadzor nad prevozniki, certificiranimi v Beninu, Komisija meni, da se ne sme dovoliti nadaljnjega opravljanja letov prevoznika Alafia Jet v Skupnost.
On the basis of the common criteria, it is therefore assessed that Alafia Jet should be included in Annex A.
Na podlagi splošnih meril se torej ocenjuje, da je treba prevoznika Alafia Jet vključiti v Prilogo A.
The Commission fully supports the efforts undertaken by the competent authorities of Benin to improve the safety oversight of its carriers, and considers that the substantial donation announced by the World Bank in favour of the Republic of Benin will pave the way for substantial progress towards compliance with ICAO standards.
Komisija v celoti podpira prizadevanja pristojnih organov Benina za izboljšanje nadzora nad varnostjo njegovih prevoznikov in meni, da bo obsežna donacija, ki jo je Svetovna banka napovedala v korist Republike Benin, omogočila velik napredek pri izpolnjevanju standardov ICAO.
Air Carriers from the Republic of Gabon
Letalski prevozniki iz Gabonske republike
Gabon Airlines was allowed since July 2008 to operate in the EU only with the aircraft of type Boeing 767-200 with registration marks TR-LHP under the conditions presented in the recital (15) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2008 [14].
Prevoznik Gabon Airlines je imel od julija 2008 dovoljenje za opravljanje letov v EU samo z zrakoplovom vrste Boeing 767-200 z registrsko oznako TR-LHP pod pogoji iz uvodne izjave (15) Uredbe (ES) št. 715/2008 [14].
Since then, there is verified evidence of safety deficiencies on the part of Gabon Airlines certified in Gabon.
Od takrat obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o varnostnih pomanjkljivostih prevoznika Gabon Airlines, certificiranega v Gabonu.
These deficiencies have been identified by France during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [15].
Te pomanjkljivosti je med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [15], odkrila Francija.