natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
amending Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 on the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2869/95 o pristojbinah, ki se plačujejo Uradu za harmonizacijo notranjega trga (blagovne znamke in modeli), in Uredbe (ES) št. 2868/95 za izvedbo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 40/94 o znamki Skupnosti
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark [1] and in particular Articles 139 and 157 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 40/94 z dne 20. decembra 1993 o znamki Skupnosti [1] in zlasti členov 139 in 157 Uredbe,
Article 139(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 lays down that the amounts of the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market, hereinafter ‘the Office’, are to be fixed at such a level as to ensure that the revenue in respect thereof is sufficient to ensure that its budget is balanced.
Člen 139(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 40/94 določa, da se zneski pristojbin, ki se plačujejo Uradu za harmonizacijo notranjega trga, v nadaljnjem besedilu „Urad“, določijo na višini, ki zagotavlja, da prihodki iz njih načeloma zadoščajo za uravnotežen proračun Urada.
The Office is generating substantial cash reserves.
Urad ustvarja znatne denarne rezerve.
A further increase in the revenue of the Office and, as a consequence, budgetary surplus of the Office is expected.
Pričakuje se dodatno zvišanje dohodkov Urada in posledično njegov proračunski presežek.
This is in particular the result of the payment of application and registration fees for Community trade marks.
To je zlasti posledica plačil pristojbin za prijavo in registracijo blagovnih znamk Skupnosti.
A reduction in fees would therefore be one of the measures for ensuring that the budget is balanced, while fostering access to the Community trade mark system for users.
Posledično bi bilo lahko zmanjšanje pristojbin eden od možnih ukrepov za zagotavljanje proračunskega ravnotežja ob krepitvi dostopa uporabnikov do sistema blagovnih znamk Skupnosti.
In order to reduce the administrative burden on both the users and the Office the fee structure should be simplified by fixing the amount of the registration fee for a Community trade mark at zero.
Za zmanjšanje upravnega bremena tako za uporabnike kot za Urad bi bilo treba sistem pristojbin poenostaviti tako, da se višina pristojbine za registracijo blagovne znamke Skupnosti določi na vrednost nič.
Hence, only the payment of the application fee will be required and the processing time for the registration can be considerably reduced if no registration fee has to be paid before registering a Community trade mark.
Tako bo potrebno le plačilo pristojbine za prijavo in čas, potreben za registracijo, se bo lahko znatno zmanjšal, če pred registracijo znamke Skupnosti ne bo potrebno plačilo registracijske pristojbine.
In relation to international registrations designating the European Community the fixing of the amount of the registration fee for a Community trade mark at zero implies that the amount of the fee to be refunded pursuant to Article 149(4) or Article 151(4) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 has to be set to zero as well.
V zvezi z mednarodnimi registracijami, ki označujejo Evropsko skupnost, odločitev, da se višina pristojbine za registracijo blagovne znamke Skupnosti določi na vrednost nič, pomeni, da se tudi višina pristojbine, ki se povrne v skladu s členom 149(4) ali 151(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 40/94, določi na vrednost nič.
The reduction in fees should ensure a proper balance between the Community and national trade mark systems, taking into account the future development of the relations between the Office and industrial property offices of Member States, including the remuneration for services rendered by the offices of Member States.
Z znižanjem pristojbin bi bilo treba zagotoviti ustrezno ravnovesje med sistemom znamke Skupnosti in nacionalnimi sistemi, pri čemer je treba upoštevati prihodnji razvoj odnosov med Uradom in uradi za industrijsko lastnino držav članic, vključno s povrnitvijo stroškov storitev, ki jih nudijo uradi v državah članicah.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 of 13 December 1995 on the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) [2] and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark [3] should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 2869/95 z dne 13. decembra 1995 o pristojbinah, ki se plačujejo Uradu za harmonizacijo notranjega trga (blagovne znamke in modeli) [2], in Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 2868/95 z dne 13. decembra 1995 za izvedbo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 40/94 o znamki Skupnosti [3] bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
A transitional provision is required to ensure legal certainty while providing maximum benefit to both the users and the Office.
Potrebna bo prehodna določba, da se zagotovita pravna gotovost in čim večja korist tako za uporabnike kot za Urad.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Fees, Implementation Rules and the Procedure of the Boards of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs),
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za pristojbine, pravila izvajanja ter postopke odbora za pritožbe Urada za harmonizacijo na notranjem trgu (znamke in modeli) –
The table in Article 2 is amended as follows:
Razpredelnica iz člena 2 se spremeni:
Basic fee for the application for an individual mark (Article 26(2), Rule 4(a))
Osnovna pristojbina za prijavo posamezne znamke [člen 26(2), pravilo 4(a)]
point 1b is replaced by the following:
točka 1b se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Basic fee for the application for an individual mark by electronic means (Article 26(2), Rule 4(a))
Osnovna pristojbina za elektronsko prijavo za posamezno znamko [člen 26(2), pravilo 4(a)]
Basic fee for the application for a collective mark (Article 26(2) and Article 64(3), Rule 4(a) and Rule 42)
Osnovna pristojbina za prijavo za kolektivno znamko [člen 26(2) in člen 64(3), pravilo 4(a) in pravilo 42]
points 7 to 11 are replaced by the following:
točke 7 do 11 se nadomestijo z naslednjimi:
Basic fee for the registration of an individual mark (Article 45)
Osnovna pristojbina za registracijo posamezne znamke [člen 45]
Fee for each class of goods and services exceeding three for an individual mark (Article 45)
Pristojbina za vsak razred blaga in storitev, ki presega tri razrede za posamezno znamko [člen 45]
Basic fee for the registration of a collective mark (Article 45 and Article 64(3))
Osnovna pristojbina za registracijo kolektivne znamke [člen 45 in člen 64(3)]
Fee for each class of goods and services exceeding three for a collective mark (Article 45 and Article 64(3))
Pristojbina za vsak razred blaga in storitev, ki presega tri razrede, za kolektivno znamko [člen 45 in člen 64(3)]
Additional fee for the late payment of the registration fee (point 2 of Article 157(2))
Dodatna pristojbina za prepozno plačilo registracijske pristojbine (točka 2 člena 157(2))
for an individual mark: EUR 870 plus, where applicable, EUR 150 for each class of goods and services exceeding three;
za posamezno znamko: 870 EUR plus, kjer je to primerno, 150 EUR za vsak razred blaga ali storitev, ki presega tri;
for a collective mark as referred to in Rule 121(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95: EUR 1620 plus, where applicable, EUR 300 for each class of goods or services exceeding three.’
za kolektivno znamko iz pravila 121(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 2868/95: 1620 EUR plus, kjer je to primerno, 300 EUR za vsak razred blaga ali storitev, ki presega tri.“
Refund of fees following refusal of protection
Vračilo pristojbin po zavrnitvi zaščite
Where the refusal is either for all or only part of the goods and services contained in the designation of the European Community, the amount of the fee to be refunded pursuant to Article 149(4) or Article 151(4) of the Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 shall be:
Kadar je zavrnitev za vse blago in storitve, vsebovane v oznaki Evropske skupnosti, ali le za del tega blaga in storitev, znaša višina vračila pristojbine v skladu s členom 149(4) ali členom 151(4) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 40/94
for an individual mark: an amount corresponding to the fee mentioned in point 7 of the table in Article 2 plus an amount corresponding to the fee mentioned in point 8 of that table for each class of goods and services contained in the international registration exceeding three;
za posamezno znamko: znesek, enak pristojbini iz točke 7 v razpredelnici iz člena 2, plus znesek, enak pristojbini iz točke 8 navedene razpredelnice, za vsak razred blaga in storitev v mednarodni registraciji, ki presega tri razrede;
for a collective mark: an amount corresponding to the fee mentioned in point 9 of the table in Article 2 plus an amount corresponding to the fee mentioned in point 10 of that table for each class of goods and services contained in the international registration exceeding three.
za kolektivno znamko: znesek, enak pristojbini iz točke 9 v razpredelnici iz člena 2, plus znesek, enak pristojbini iz točke 10 navedene razpredelnice, za vsak razred blaga in storitev v mednarodni registraciji, ki presega tri razrede.
The refund shall be made once the communication to the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 113(2)(b) and (c) or Rule 115(5)(b), (c) and (6) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 has been issued.
Povračilo se izvede, potem ko je bilo izdano sporočilo mednarodnemu uradu v skladu s pravilom 113(2)(b) in (c) ali pravilom 115(5)(b), (c) in (6) Uredbe (ES) št. 2868/95.
The refund shall be made to the holder of the international registration or his representative.’
Vračilo se izplača imetniku mednarodne registracije ali njegovemu zastopniku.“
In Rule 13a(3) point (c) is deleted.
V pravilu 13a(3) se črta točka (c).
Rule 23 is replaced by the following:
Pravilo 23 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Rule 23
„Pravilo 23
Registration of the trade mark
Registracija znamke
Where no opposition has been entered or where any opposition entered has been finally disposed of by withdrawal, rejection or other disposition, the trade mark applied for and the particulars referred to in Rule 84(2) shall be recorded in the Register of Community trade marks.
Če ni vložen ugovor ali pa je bil vloženi ugovor dokončno rešen z umikom, zavrženjem ali kako drugače, se znamka, za katero je vložena prijava, in podrobni podatki iz pravila 84(2) vnesejo v Register blagovnih znamk Skupnosti.
The registration shall be published in the Community Trade Marks Bulletin.’
Registracija se objavi v Biltenu za blagovne znamke Skupnosti.“
A Community trade mark application in respect of which a notification described in Rule 23(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 in its version in force before the date of entry into force of this Regulation has been sent before that date shall continue to be subject to Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 and Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 in their versions in force before the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Prijava za blagovno znamko Skupnosti, za katero je bilo obvestilo, opisano v pravilu 23(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2868/95, v obliki, kakršna je veljala pred datumom začetka veljave te uredbe, poslano pred navedenim datumom, se še vedno obravnava v skladu z uredbama (ES) št. 2868/95 in št. 2869/95 v oblikah, v kakršnih sta veljali pred datumom začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
An international application or a request for territorial extension designating the European Community which has been filed before the day on which the amounts mentioned in Article 11(3), points (a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 in its version as amended by this Regulation take effect according to Article 8(7)(b) of the Madrid Protocol shall continue to be subject to Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 in its version in force before the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Mednarodna prijava ali zahtevek za ozemeljsko razširitev, ki označuje Evropsko skupnost, vložen pred datumom, na katerega začnejo veljati zneski iz točk (a) in (b) člena 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 2869/95, kakor je bila spremenjena s to uredbo, se v skladu s členom 8(7)(b) Madridskega protokola še naprej obravnava v skladu s členom 13 Uredbe (ES) št. 2869/95 v obliki, v kakršni je veljala pred datumom začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 356/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 356/2009
initiating a ‘new exporter’ review of Council Regulation (EC) No 452/2007 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ironing boards originating, inter alia, in the People’s Republic of China, repealing the duty with regard to imports from one exporter in this country and making these imports subject to registration
o začetku pregleda Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 452/2007 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz likalnih desk s poreklom med drugim iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („pregled glede novega izvoznika“), odpravi dajatve na uvoz od enega izvoznika iz te države in uvedbi prijave takšnega uvoza
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation) and in particular Article 11(4).
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 11(4) Uredbe,
The Commission has received an application for a ‘new exporter’ review pursuant to Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je prejela zahtevek za pregled glede „novega izvoznika“ v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe.
The application was lodged by Greenwood Houseware (Zuhai) Ltd (the applicant), an exporting producer in the People’s Republic of China (the country concerned).
Zahtevek je vložila družba Greenwood Houseware (Zuhai) Ltd („vložnik“), proizvajalka izvoznica iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („zadevna država“).
The product under review is ironing boards, whether or not free-standing, with or without a steam soaking and/or heating top and/or blowing top, including sleeve boards, and essential parts thereof, i.e. the legs, the top and the iron rest originating in the People’s Republic of China (the product concerned), currently classifiable within CN codes ex39249090, ex44219098, ex73239390, ex73239991, ex73239999, ex85167970 and ex85169000.
Izdelek, ki se pregleduje, so likalne deske, prostostoječe ali ne, s sistemom za vsrkavanje odvečne pare in/ali ogrevalnim sistemom in/ali sistemom za pihanje zraka ali brez navedenih sistemov, vključno z rokavniki in njihovimi bistvenimi deli, tj. podnožjem, prevleko in odlagalno površino za likalnik, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („zadevni izdelek“) in trenutno uvrščene v oznake KN ex39249090, ex44219098, ex73239390, ex73239991, ex73239999, ex85167970 in ex85169000.
The measures currently in force are a definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 452/2007 [2], under which imports into the Community of the product concerned originating in the People’s Republic of China, including the product concerned produced by the applicant, are subject to a definitive antidumping duty of 38,1 % with the exception of several companies expressly mentioned which are subject to individual duty rates.
Trenutno veljavni ukrep je dokončna protidampinška dajatev, uvedena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 452/2007 [2], v skladu s katero velja dokončna protidampinška dajatev 38,1 % za uvoz v Skupnost zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, vključno z zadevnim izdelkom, ki ga proizvaja vložnik, razen za izrecno navedene družbe, za katere veljajo individualne stopnje dajatev.
The applicant alleges that it operates under market economy conditions as defined in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation or alternatively claims individual treatment in conformity with Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Vložnik trdi, da deluje v razmerah tržnega gospodarstva, kot določa člen 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, oziroma zahteva individualno obravnavo v skladu s členom 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
It further alleges that it did not export the product concerned to the Community during the period of investigation on which the anti-dumping measures were based, i.e., the period from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2005 (the original investigation period) and that it is not related to any of the exporting producers of the product which are subject to the abovementioned anti-dumping measures.
Trdi tudi, da v obdobju preiskave, tj. od 1. januarja 2005 do 31. decembra 2005 („prvotno obdobje preiskave“), na katerem je temeljila uvedba protidampinških ukrepov, ni izvažal zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost, in ni povezan z nobenim od proizvajalcev izvoznikov izdelka, za katere veljajo navedeni protidampinški ukrepi.
The applicant further alleges that it began exporting the product concerned to the Community after the end of the original investigation period.
Vložnik poleg tega trdi, da je začel izvažati zadevni izdelek v Skupnost po koncu obdobja prvotne preiskave.
Community producers known to be concerned have been informed of the above application and have been given and opportunity to comment.
Proizvajalci Skupnosti, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, so bili obveščeni o zgornjem zahtevku in imeli možnost predložiti svoje pripombe.
Having examined the evidence available, the Commission concludes that there is sufficient evidence to justify the initiation of a ‘new exporter’ review, pursuant to Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation.
Po proučitvi razpoložljivih dokazov Komisija ugotavlja, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda glede „novega izvoznika“ v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe.
Upon receipt of the claim mentioned below under 8(c), it will be determined whether the applicant operates under market economy conditions as defined in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation or alternatively whether the applicant fulfils the requirements to have an individual duty established in accordance with Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Po prejemu zahtevka iz točke 8(c) se bo določilo, ali vložnik deluje v razmerah tržnega gospodarstva iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe ali pa izpolnjuje zahteve za določitev individualne dajatve v skladu s členom 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
If so, the applicant’s individual margin of dumping shall be calculated and, should dumping be found, the level of the duty to which its imports of the product concerned into the Community should be subject shall be determined.
Če vložnik izpolnjuje zahteve za individualno stopnjo dampinga, se ta izračuna in se v primeru ugotovitve dampinga določi raven dajatve, ki se mora uporabljati za uvoz zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost.
If it is determined that the applicant fulfils the requirements to have an individual duty established, it may be necessary to amend the rate of duty currently applicable to imports of the product concerned from companies not individually mentioned in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 452/2007.
Če se ugotovi, da vložnik izpolnjuje zahteve za določitev individualne dajatve, bo morda treba prilagoditi trenutno veljavno stopnjo dajatve za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga proizvajajo družbe, ki niso posamično navedene v členu 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 452/2007.
In order to obtain the information it deems necessary for its investigation, the Commission will send a questionnaire to the applicant.
Komisija bo vložniku poslala vprašalnik, da bi dobila informacije, za katere meni, da so potrebne za njeno preiskavo.
Attention is drawn to the fact that the exercise of most procedural rights set out in the basic Regulation depends on the parties making themselves known within the period provided for by the present Regulation.
Opozoriti je treba, da je uveljavljanje večine postopkovnih pravic iz osnovne uredbe odvisno od tega, ali se stranka javi v roku iz te uredbe.
In the event that the applicant provides sufficient evidence that it operates under market economy conditions, i.e. that it meets the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, normal value will be determined in accordance with Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Če vložnik predloži dovolj dokazov, da deluje v razmerah tržnega gospodarstva, tj. da izpolnjuje merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, bo normalna vrednost določena v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission will send claim forms to the applicant, as well as to the authorities of the People’s Republic of China.
Komisija bo vložniku in pristojnim organom Ljudske republike Kitajske poslala obrazce zahtevka.
This claim form may also be used by the applicant to claim individual treatment, i.e. that it meets the criteria laid down in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Vložnik lahko uporabi obrazec zahtevka tudi za zahtevek za individualno obravnavo, tj. da izpolnjuje merila iz člena 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
In the event that the applicant is not granted market economy treatment but fulfils the requirements to have an individual duty established in accordance with Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation, an appropriate market economy country will be used for the purpose of establishing normal value in respect of the People’s Republic of China in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Kadar se vložniku ne odobri tržnogospodarska obravnava, vendar izpolnjuje zahteve za določitev individualne dajatve v skladu s členom 9(5) osnovne uredbe, se bo za določitev normalne vrednosti za Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe uporabila primerna država s tržnim gospodarstvom.
The Commission envisages using Turkey again for this purpose as was done in the investigation which led to the imposition of measures on imports of the product concerned from the People’s Republic of China.
Komisija namerava v ta namen ponovno uporabiti Turčijo, kakor je storila že med preiskavo, ki je privedla do uvedbe ukrepov za uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
Interested parties are hereby invited to comment on the appropriateness of this choice within the specific time limit set in Article 4(2) of this Regulation.
Zainteresirane stranke so vabljene, da v roku iz člena 4(2) te uredbe predložijo pripombe k ustreznosti te izbire.
The Commission envisages using Turkey also for this purpose.
Komisija namerava uporabiti Turčijo tudi v ta namen.
Pursuant to Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation, the anti-dumping duty in force should be repealed with regard to imports of the product concerned which are produced and sold for export to the Community by the applicant.
V skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe je treba razveljaviti veljavno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga vložnik proizvaja in prodaja za izvoz v Skupnost.
At the same time, such imports should be made subject to registration in accordance with Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation, in order to ensure that, should the review result in a finding of dumping in respect of the applicant, anti-dumping duties can be levied retroactively from the date of the initiation of this review.
Hkrati je treba tak uvoz registrirati v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe, s čimer se zagotovi obračun protidampinških dajatev za nazaj od datuma začetka tega pregleda, če se pri pregledu ugotovi damping s strani vložnika.
TIME LIMITS
IN ROKI
interested parties may make themselves known to the Commission, present their views in writing and submit the replies to the questionnaire mentioned in recital 8(a) of this Regulation or provide any other information to be taken into account during the investigation;
se zainteresirane stranke lahko javijo Komisiji, pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in predložijo izpolnjene vprašalnike iz uvodne izjave 8(a) te uredbe ali zagotovijo katere koli druge informacije, ki naj bi se upoštevale med preiskavo;