natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Without prejudice to any wider scope that may be given in national laws or regulations or collective agreements, the on-board procedures may be used by seafarers to lodge complaints relating to any matter that is alleged to constitute a breach of the requirements of the Convention (including seafarers’ rights).
Postopek na krovu ladje omogoča pomorščakom, da vložijo pritožbo v zvezi s katero koli zadevo, ki domnevno pomeni kršitev zahtev te konvencije (vključno s pravicami pomorščakov), in sicer brez poseganja v kateri koli širši obseg pravic, ki ga lahko ponujajo nacionalni zakoni ali predpisi ali kolektivni sporazumi.
Each Member State shall ensure that, in its laws or regulations, appropriate on-board complaint procedures are in place to meet the requirements of Regulation 5.1.5.
Vsaka država članica s svojimi zakoni ali predpisi zagotovi, da se na krovu ladje izvaja ustrezen pritožbeni postopek, usklajen z zahtevami predpisa 5.1.5.
Such procedures shall seek to resolve complaints at the lowest level possible.
Ta postopek si prizadeva rešiti pritožbo na najnižji možni ravni.
However, in all cases, seafarers shall have a right to complain directly to the master and, where they consider it necessary, to appropriate external authorities.
Vendar pa lahko pomorščaki v vseh primerih vložijo pritožbo neposredno kapitanu in ustreznemu zunanjemu organu, če menijo, da je to potrebno.
The on-board complaint procedures shall include the right of the seafarer to be accompanied or represented during the complaints procedure, as well as safeguards against the possibility of victimisation of seafarers for filing complaints.
Pritožbeni postopek na krovu ladje vključuje tudi pravico pomorščaka, da med pritožbenim postopkom dobi spremljevalca ali zastopnika, ter tudi zaščito pred morebitnim šikaniranjem, do katerega lahko pride zaradi vložene pritožbe.
The term ‘victimisation’ covers any adverse action taken by any person with respect to a seafarer for lodging a complaint which is not manifestly vexatious or maliciously made.
Izraz „šikaniranje“ zajema vsa dejanja katere koli osebe, ki so sovražna do pomorščaka, ker je vložil pritožbo, ki očitno ni bila vložena z namenom, da nadleguje ali škoduje.
In addition to a copy of their seafarers’ employment agreement, all seafarers shall be provided with a copy of the on-board complaint procedures applicable on the ship.
Poleg izvoda pogodbe o zaposlitvi pomorščakov se vsem pomorščakom zagotovi izvod opisa pritožbenega postopka, ki se uporablja na ladji.
This shall include contact information for the competent authority in the flag State and, where different, in the seafarers’ country of residence, and the name of a person or persons on board the ship who can, on a confidential basis, provide seafarers with impartial advice on their complaint and otherwise assist them in following the complaint procedures available to them on board the ship.
Priloženi izvod vsebuje informacije o stiku s pristojnim organom v državi zastave in v državi bivanja pomorščakov ter ime osebe ali imena oseb na ladji, ki lahko na podlagi zaščite zaupnosti pomorščakom nepristransko svetujejo o njihovi pritožbi in jim tudi drugače pomagajo, da se bolje seznanijo s pritožbenim postopkom, ki jim je na voljo na ladji.
Subsequent to any amendments to any of the provisions of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, and if requested by either one of the Parties to this Agreement, a review of the application of this Agreement shall be carried out.
Po kakršnih koli spremembah določb iz Konvencije o delovnih standardih v pomorstvu iz leta 2006 ali če tako zahteva katera izmed strank v tem sporazumu, se izvede pregled uporabe tega sporazuma.
The social partners make this Agreement on condition that it shall not enter into force until the date when the ILO Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 enters into force, such date being 12 months after the date on which there have been registered with the International Labour Office ratifications by at least 30 Members with a total share in the world gross tonnage of ships of 33 per cent.
Socialni partnerji sprejmejo ta sporazum pod pogojem, da ne začne veljati pred datumom začetka veljavnosti Konvencije ILO o delovnih standardih v pomorstvu iz leta 2006, ta datum pa je 12 mesecev po dnevu, ko se z ratifikacijo pri Mednarodni organizaciji dela registrira vsaj 30 članic, katerih delež skupne bruto tonaže znaša 33 % svetovne bruto tonaže.
Member States and/or the social partners can maintain or introduce more favourable provisions for seafarers than set out in this Agreement.
Države članice in/ali socialni partnerji lahko ohranijo ali uvedejo določbe za pomorščake, ki so ugodnejše od določb iz tega sporazuma.
This Agreement shall be without prejudice to any more stringent and/or specific existing Community legislation.
Ta sporazum ne posega v nobeno strožjo in/ali specifično veljavno zakonodajo Skupnosti.
This Agreement shall not affect any law, custom or agreement which provides for more favourable conditions for the seafarers concerned.
Ta sporazum ne vpliva na noben zakon, navado ali sporazum, ki zadevnim pomorščakom omogoča ugodnejše razmere.
For example, the terms of this Agreement are without prejudice to Council Directive 89/391/EEC on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work, to Council Directive 92/29/EEC on the minimum safety and health requirements for improved medical treatment on board vessels and to Council Directive 1999/63/EC concerning the Agreement on the organisation of working time of seafarers (to be amended in accordance with Annex A to this Agreement).
Na primer, določbe iz tega sporazuma ne posegajo v Direktivo Sveta 1989/391/EGS o uvajanju ukrepov za spodbujanje izboljšav varnosti in zdravja delavcev pri delu, Direktivo Sveta 92/29/EGS o minimalnih varnostnih in zdravstvenih zahtevah za izboljšanje medicinske oskrbe na ladjah ter Direktivo Sveta 1999/63/ES o sporazumu o razporejanju delovnega časa pomorščakov (se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo A k temu sporazumu).
Implementation of this Agreement shall not constitute valid grounds for reducing the general level of protection afforded to seafarers in the field of the Agreement.
Izvajanje tega sporazuma ni tehten razlog za znižanje splošne ravni zaščite za pomorščake na področju, ki ga zajema Sporazum.
EUROPEAN TRANSPORT WORKERS’ FEDERATION (ETF)
EVROPSKA FEDERACIJA DELAVCEV V PROMETU (ETF)
EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SHIPOWNERS’ ASSOCIATIONS (ECSA)
ZDRUŽENJE LADJARJEV EVROPSKE SKUPNOSTI (ECSA)
CHAIRPERSON MARITIME TRANSPORT SECTORAL DIALOGUE COMMITTEE
PREDSEDNIK ODBORA ZA DIALOG V SEKTORJU POMORSKEGA PROMETA
BRUSSELS, 19 MAY 2008.
BRUSELJ, 19. MAJA 2008
AMENDMENTS TO THE AGREEMENT ON THE ORGANISATION OF WORKING TIME OF SEAFARERS CONCLUDED ON 30 SEPTEMBER 1998
SPREMEMBE K SPORAZUMU O ORGANIZACIJI DELOVNEGA ČASA POMORŠČAKOV Z DNE 30. SEPTEMBRA 1998
In their discussions leading to the conclusion of their Agreement on the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, the social partners additionally reviewed the Agreement on the Organisation of Working Time of Seafarers concluded on 30 September 1998, in order to verify that it was consistent with corresponding provisions of the Convention and agree any necessary amendments.
Socialni partnerji so pri razpravah, ki so vodile do Sporazuma o Konvenciji o delovnih standardih v pomorstvu iz leta 2006, dodatno pregledali Sporazum o razporejanju delovnega časa pomorščakov z dne 30. septembra 1998, da so preverili njegovo skladnost z ustreznimi določbami iz Konvencije ter se dogovorili o nujnih spremembah.
As a result, the social partners have agreed the following amendments to the Agreement on the Organisation of Working Time of Seafarers:
Kot posledica so se socialni partnerji strinjali z naslednjimi spremembami Sporazuma o razporejanju delovnega časa pomorščakov:
Clause 1
Določba 1
Insert new paragraph 3:
Doda se nova točka 3:
Clause 2(c)
Določba 2(c)
Replace Clause 2(c) with:
Določba 2(c) se nadomesti z:
the term “seafarer” means any person who is employed or engaged or works in any capacity on board a ship to which this Agreement applies;’;
izraz ‚pomorščak‘ pomeni vsako osebo, ki je zaposlena ali najeta ali dela v kakršni koli vlogi na ladji, na katero se Sporazum nanaša;“.
Clause 2 (d)
Določba 2(d)
Replace Clause 2(d) with:
Določba 2(d) se nadomesti z:
Clause 6
Določba 6
Replace Clause 6 with:
Določba 6 se nadomesti z:
Clause 13
Določba 13
Replace Clause 13(1) first sentence with:
Nadomesti se prvi stavek določbe 13(1):
A medical certificate issued in accordance with the requirements of STCW shall be accepted by the competent authority, for the purpose of paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Clause.
Zdravniško spričevalo, izdano v skladu z zahtevami iz STCW, sprejme pristojni organ za namene iz točk 1 in 2 te določbe.
The medical certificates for seafarers working on ships ordinarily engaged on international voyages must as a minimum be provided in English.’
Zdravniška spričevala za pomorščake na ladjah, ki običajno opravljajo mednarodne plovbe, morajo biti vsaj v angleškem jeziku.“
The subsequent sentences of Clause 13(1) and paragraph 13(2) become paragraphs 13 to 15;
Naslednji stavki določbe 13(1) in določba 13(2) postanejo točke 13 do 15.
Clause 16:
Določba 16
Replace first sentence with:
Prvi stavek se nadomesti z:
The annual leave with pay entitlement shall be calculated on the basis of a minimum of 2,5 calendar days per month of employment and pro rata for incomplete months.’.
Plačan letni dopust se izračuna na podlagi najmanj 2,5 koledarskega dne na mesec zaposlitve in sorazmerno za nedokončane mesece.“
Night work of seafarers under the age of 18 shall be prohibited. For the purposes of this Clause, “night” shall be defined in accordance with national law and practice.
Prepove se nočno delo pomorščakov, mlajših od 18 let.
Directive 2009/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2009/14/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Directive 94/19/EC on deposit-guarantee schemes as regards the coverage level and the payout delay
o spremembah Direktive 94/19/ES o sistemih zajamčenih vlog glede stopnje kritja in rokov za izplačilo
The Council agreed on 7 October 2008 that it is a priority to restore confidence and proper functioning of the financial sector.
Svet se je 7. oktobra 2008 dogovoril, da je prednostna naloga ponovno vzpostaviti zaupanje in pravilno delovanje finančnega sektorja.
It undertook to take all necessary measures to protect the deposits of individual savers and welcomed the intention of the Commission to bring forward urgently an appropriate proposal to promote convergence of deposit-guarantee schemes.
Zavezal se je, da bo sprejel vse potrebne ukrepe, da bi zaščitil vloge posameznih varčevalcev, in pozdravil namen Komisije, da bo takoj predložila ustrezni predlog za spodbujanje konvergence sistemov zajamčenih vlog.
Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] already provides for basic coverage for depositors.
Direktiva 94/19/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] že zagotavlja osnovno kritje za vlagatelje.
However, the ongoing financial turmoil necessitates an improvement of that coverage.
Vendar je treba to kritje zaradi sedanjih pretresov na finančnih trgih izboljšati.
The current minimum coverage level provided for in Directive 94/19/EC is set at EUR 20000 with the option for Member States to determine higher coverage.
Sedanja najnižja stopnja kritja je v Direktivi 94/19/ES določena pri 20000 EUR, pri čemer lahko države članice določijo višje kritje.
However, this has proved not to be adequate for a large number of deposits in the Community.
Vendar se je izkazalo, da za veliko vlog v Skupnosti to ne zadostuje.
In order to maintain depositor confidence and attain greater stability on the financial markets, the minimum coverage level should therefore be increased to EUR 50000. By 31 December 2010, coverage for the aggregate deposits of each depositor should be set at EUR 100000, unless a Commission impact assessment, submitted to the European Parliament and the Council by 31 December 2009, concludes that such an increase and such harmonisation are inappropriate and are not financially viable for all Member States in order to ensure consumer protection and financial stability in the Community and to avoid distortions of competition between Member States.
Da bi ohranili zaupanje vlagateljev in večjo stabilnost na finančnih trgih, bi morali najnižjo stopnjo kritja zato povišati na 50000 EUR. Da bi zavarovali potrošnike in zagotovili finančno stabilnost v Skupnosti ter se izognili izkrivljanju konkurence med državami članicami, bi se moralo kritje celotnih vlog do 31. decembra 2010 določiti na 100000 EUR, razen če Komisija v oceni učinka, ki jo do 31. decembra 2009 predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, ugotovi, da takšno povišanje in uskladitev nista ne ustrezna ne finančno izvedljiva za vse države članice.
In the event that the impact assessment reveals that such an increase and such harmonisation are inappropriate, the Commission should submit appropriate proposals to the European Parliament and the Council.
Če bi ocena učinka pokazala, da povišanje in uskladitev nista primerna, mora Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predložiti ustrezne predloge.
The same coverage level should apply to all depositors regardless of whether a Member State’s currency is the euro or not.
Za vse vlagatelje se mora uporabljati enaka raven kritja, ne glede na to, ali je v državi članici valuta euro.
Member States outside the euro area should have the possibility to round off the amounts resulting from the conversion without compromising the equivalent protection of depositors.
Države članice zunaj euro območja bi morale imeti možnost, da zneske po valutni pretvorbi zaokrožijo, pri čemer pa ne smejo ogroziti enake zaščite vlagateljev.
A report to be submitted to the European Parliament and to the Council by the Commission should analyse all related issues such as set-offs and counterclaims, the determination of contributions to schemes, the scope of products and depositors covered, the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation between deposit-guarantee schemes and the link between deposit-guarantee schemes and alternative means for reimbursing depositors, such as emergency payout mechanisms.
V poročilu, ki ga Komisija predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, bi bilo treba preučiti vsa zadevna vprašanja, kot so poravnava in protiterjatve, določitev prispevkov za programe, obseg proizvodov in vlagateljev, ki so kriti, učinkovitost čezmejnega sodelovanja med sistemi zajamčenih vlog ter povezava med sistemi zajamčenih vlog in drugimi načini povračila vlagateljem, kot so mehanizmi nujnih izplačil.
For the purpose of that report, Member States should collect the relevant data and submit them to the Commission on request.
Države članice za namene tega poročila zberejo ustrezne podatke in jih predložijo Komisiji na zahtevo.
Some Member States have established deposit-guarantee schemes under Directive 94/19/EC which provide full coverage for certain kinds of long-term deposits, such as claims on pensions.
Nekatere države članice so vzpostavile sisteme zajamčenih vlog v skladu z Direktivo 94/19/ES, ki v celoti krijejo določene vrste dolgoročnih vlog, kot so izplačila pokojnin.
It is necessary to respect the rights and expectations of the depositors in such schemes.
Pravice in pričakovanja vlagateljev v teh sistemih je treba spoštovati.
Some Member States have established or plan to establish deposit-guarantee schemes under Directive 94/19/EC which provide full coverage for certain temporarily increased account balances.
Nekatere države članice so vzpostavile ali nameravajo vzpostaviti sisteme zajamčenih vlog v skladu z Direktivo 94/19/ES, ki v celoti krijejo nekatere primere začasno povečanega stanja sredstev na računu.
The Commission should assess, by 31 December 2009, whether full coverage for certain temporarily increased account balances should be maintained or introduced.
Komisija bi morala do 31. decembra 2009 oceniti, ali bi bilo treba ohraniti oziroma uvesti popolno kritje začasno povečanega stanja na računu.
The functioning of systems which protect the credit institution itself and, in particular, ensure its liquidity and solvency, thus guaranteeing protection for depositors at least equivalent to that provided by a deposit-guarantee scheme, and voluntary systems of depositors compensation which are not introduced or officially recognised by a Member State should not be affected by this Directive.
Ta direktiva ne sme vplivati na delovanje sistemov, ki ščitijo samo kreditno institucijo, še zlasti zagotavljajo njeno solventnost in likvidnost, s tem pa tudi zaščito vlagateljev, ki je najmanj enakovredna zaščiti v sistemih zajamčenih vlog, ter na prostovoljne sisteme za izplačevanje odškodnin vlagateljem, ki jih ni uvedla ali uradno priznala država članica.
Member States should encourage deposit-guarantee schemes to consider entering into agreements or improving existing agreements concerning their respective obligations.
Države članice bi morale sisteme zajamčenih vlog spodbujati, da sklenejo sporazume oziroma izboljšajo veljavne sporazume v zvezi s svojimi obveznostmi.
The payout delay of three months currently provided for, which can be extended to nine months, runs counter to the need to maintain depositor confidence and does not meet their needs.
Obdobje izplačila, ki sedaj znaša tri mesece in ga je mogoče podaljšati na devet mesecev, ne prispeva k ohranjanju zaupanja vlagateljev in ne zadovoljuje njihovih potreb.
The payout delay should therefore be reduced to a period of 20 working days.
Zato bi bilo treba rok za izplačilo zmanjšati na dvajset delovnih dni.
That period should be extended only under exceptional circumstances and after approval by the competent authorities.
To obdobje bi se lahko podaljšalo le v izrednih okoliščinah in po privolitvi ustreznih organov.
Two years after the entry into force of this Directive the Commission should submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the effectiveness and delays of the payout procedures assessing whether a further reduction of the delay to 10 working days would be appropriate.
Komisija bi morala dve leti po začetku veljavnosti te direktive predložiti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poročilo o učinkovitosti in rokih v postopkih izplačila, v katerem bo ocenila, ali bi bilo ustrezno rok nadalje skrajšati na deset delovnih dni.
Furthermore, in cases where the payout is triggered by a determination of the competent authorities, the decision period of 21 days currently provided for should be reduced to five working days in order not to impede rapid payout.
Poleg tega je treba v primerih, ko odločitev pristojnih organov sproži izplačilo, rok za odločitev, ki je sedaj 21 dni, skrajšati na pet delovnih dni, da hitro izplačilo ne bo ovirano.
The competent authorities should, however, first be satisfied that a credit institution has failed to repay deposits which are due and payable.
Vendar bi se morali pristojni organi najprej prepričati, da kreditna institucija ni povrnila zapadlih in vračljivih vlog.
That assessment should be subject to the judicial or administrative procedures of the Member States.
Takšna ocena mora biti sprejeta v sodnih in upravnih postopkih držav članic.
Deposits may be considered unavailable once early intervention or reorganisation measures have been unsuccessful.
Lahko se šteje, da vloge niso na voljo, če zgodnji intervencijski ukrepi ali ukrepi prestrukturiranja niso bili uspešni.
This should not prevent competent authorities from making further restructuring efforts during the payout delay.
To pa pristojnih organov ne bi smelo odvrniti od nadaljnjega prizadevanja za prestrukturiranje v obdobju izplačila.
Member States should aim at ensuring the continuity of banking services and access to liquidity of banks, in particular in periods of financial turmoil.
Države članice bi si morale prizadevati za nemotenost bančnih storitev in dostop do likvidnosti bank, še posebej v času finančne krize.
For this purpose, Member States are encouraged to make arrangements as soon as possible for ensuring emergency payouts of appropriate amounts upon the application of the affected depositor, within no more than three days of such application.
Zato se države članice opogumlja, da čim prej sprejmejo predpise za zagotovitev nujnih izplačil ustreznih zneskov na zahtevo prizadetega vlagatelja v roku največ treh dni po zahtevi.
Since the reduction of the current payout delay of three months will have a positive impact on depositor confidence and the proper functioning of the financial markets, Member States and their deposit-guarantee schemes should ensure that the payout delay is as short as possible.
Ker bo skrajšanje sedanjega trimesečnega roka pri izplačilih povečalo zaupanje vlagateljev in pripomoglo k ustreznemu delovanju finančnih trgov, bi morale države članice in njihovi sistemi zajamčenih vlog zagotoviti, da so roki za izplačilo kar se da kratki.
Directive 94/19/EC provides the possibility for Member States to limit coverage to a specified percentage.
Direktiva 94/19/ES predvideva možnost, da lahko države članice kritje omejijo na določen odstotek.
That option has been demonstrated to undermine depositor confidence and should thus be discontinued.
Izkazalo se je, da ta možnost zmanjšuje zaupanje vlagateljev in jo je treba odpraviti.
The measures necessary for the implementation of Directive 94/19/EC should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission [4].
Ukrepi, potrebni za izvajanje Direktive 94/19/ES, se sprejmejo v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil [4].
In particular, the Commission should be empowered to adjust the coverage level according to inflation in the European Union on the basis of changes in the harmonised index of consumer prices published by the Commission.
Zlasti je treba Komisijo pooblastiti za prilagajanje stopnje kritja v skladu z inflacijo v Evropski uniji na osnovi sprememb v harmoniziranem indeksu cen življenjskih potrebščin, ki ga objavi Komisija.
Since that measure is of general scope and is designed to amend non-essential elements of Directive 94/19/EC, it must be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC.
Ker je ta ukrep splošnega obsega in je namenjen spreminjanju nebistvenih določb Direktive 94/19/ES, ga je treba sprejeti v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 5a Sklepa 1999/468/ES.
Since the objectives of this Directive, namely the harmonisation of coverage levels and of payout delays, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States because of the multitude of different rules existing in the legal systems of the various Member States and can therefore be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Ker ciljev te direktive, in sicer uskladitve stopnje kritja in rokov za izplačila, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči zaradi številnih različnih pravil, ki obstajajo v pravnih sistemih posameznih držav članic, in ker se lažje dosežejo na ravni Skupnosti, lahko Skupnost sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za dosego navedenih ciljev.
Directive 94/19/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Direktivo 94/19/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.