natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Council, following an anti-dumping investigation (the original investigation), by Regulation (EC) No 85/2006 [2] imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of farmed salmon originating in Norway.
Svet je po protidampinški preiskavi („prvotna preiskava“) z Uredbo (ES) št. 85/2006 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz gojenega lososa s poreklom iz Norveške.
The definitive duty was imposed in the form of a minimum import price (MIP).
Končna dajatev je bila uvedena v obliki minimalne uvozne cene („MUC“).
Request for review and initiation
Zahtevek za pregled in njegov začetek
On 20 February 2007, the Commission received a request for a partial interim review lodged by the following Member States: Italy, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal and Spain (the applicants) pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je 20. februarja 2007 prejela zahtevek za delni vmesni pregled, ki so ga vložile naslednje države članice: Italija, Litva, Poljska, Portugalska in Španija („vložniki“) v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
The applicants have provided prima facie evidence that the basis on which the measures were established has changed and that these changes are of a lasting nature.
Vložniki so predložili prima facie dokaze, da so se okoliščine, na podlagi katerih so bili uvedeni ukrepi, spremenile, in da so te spremembe trajne.
The applicants alleged and provided prima facie evidence showing that a comparison between a constructed normal value and export prices would lead to a reduction of dumping significantly below the level of the current measures.
Vložniki so trdili in predložili prima facie dokaze, da bi primerjava konstruirane normalne vrednosti z izvoznimi cenami pomenila zmanjšanje dampinga na raven, ki bi bila znatno nižja od ravni sedanjih ukrepov.
Therefore, the continued imposition of measures at the existing levels is no longer necessary to offset dumping.
Zato nadaljevanje izvajanja ukrepov na obstoječih ravneh ni več potrebno za izravnavanje dampinga.
This evidence was considered sufficient to justify the opening of a proceeding.
Ocenjeno je bilo, da ti dokazi zadostujejo za začetek postopka.
Accordingly, after having consulted the Advisory Committee, the Commission on 21 April 2007 initiated, by the publication of a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union [3], a partial interim review of anti-dumping measures in force on imports of farmed salmon originating in Norway in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation (the notice of initiation).
V skladu s tem je Komisija 21. aprila 2007, po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom, z objavo obvestila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3] začela delni vmesni pregled veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov na uvoz gojenega lososa s poreklom iz Norveške v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe („obvestilo o začetku“).
This review was limited in scope to the aspects of dumping with the objective of assessing the need for the continuation, removal or amendment of the existing measures.
Ta pregled je bil po obsegu omejen na damping, njegov namen pa je bil oceniti potrebo po nadaljevanju, odpravi ali spremembi obstoječih ukrepov.
The Commission officially advised all known exporters/producers in Norway, traders, importers and associations known to be concerned, and representatives of the Kingdom of Norway, of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je o začetku postopka uradno obvestila vse znane proizvajalce/izvoznike na Norveškem, trgovce, uvoznike in združenja, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in predstavnike Kraljevine Norveške.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane stranke so imele možnost pisno izraziti svoja stališča in zahtevati zaslišanje v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
Section 5(a) of the notice of initiation indicated that the Commission may decide to apply sampling in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
V skladu z oddelkom 5(a) obvestila o začetku se lahko Komisija odloči za uporabo vzorčenja v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In response to the request pursuant to Section 5(a)(i) of the notice of initiation, 267 companies provided the information requested within the specified deadline.
Informacije, zahtevane v točki 5(a)(i) obvestila o začetku, je v določenem roku zagotovilo 267 družb.
Of these, 169 were exporting producers of farmed salmon.
Med temi družbami je bilo 169 proizvajalcev izvoznikov gojenega lososa.
Exports were made either directly or indirectly via related and independent traders.
Uvoz se je izvajal neposredno ali posredno prek povezanih in samostojnih trgovcev.
In view of the large number of companies involved, it was decided to make use of the provisions for sampling and, for this purpose, a sample of producing companies, with the largest export volumes to the Community (exporting producers) was chosen, in consultation with the representatives of the Norwegian industry.
Zaradi velikega števila vpletenih podjetij je bilo odločeno, da se bo uporabilo določbe o vzorčenju, zaradi česar je bil v posvetovanju s predstavniki norveške industrije izbran vzorec družb proizvajalk z največjim obsegom izvoza v Skupnost (proizvajalci izvozniki).
The representatives of the Norwegian industry proposed to include into the sample (i) a producing company which did not export on its own but only via unrelated traders in Norway and (ii) two exporters but not producers of the product concerned.
Predstavniki norveške industrije so predlagali, da se v vzorec vključi (i) eno družbo proizvajalko, ki ni izvažala sama, ampak samo prek nepovezanih trgovcev na Norveškem, in (ii) dva izvoznika, ki nista proizvajalca zadevnega proizvoda.
This could not be accepted because as far as the producing company is concerned there were no sufficient guarantees that export sales to the Community via unrelated traders could indeed be identified.
Tega ni bilo možno sprejeti, saj v zvezi z družbo proizvajalko ni bilo zadostnih jamstev, da bi se dejansko dalo ugotoviti izvoz v Skupnost prek nepovezanih trgovcev.
As for the exporters without own production of salmon, no normal value could be established and therefore no duty could be determined for these companies.
V zvezi z izvozniki brez lastne proizvodnje lososa pa ni bilo možno določiti normalne vrednosti in zato tudi ne dajatev za te družbe.
In accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation, the selected sample covered the largest possible representative volume of exports that could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Izbrani vzorec je v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe zajel največji reprezentativni obseg izvoza, ki ga je bilo možno ustrezno preiskati v razpoložljivem času.
The exporting producers selected in the final sample represented almost 60 % of the reported volume of the product concerned exported to the Community.
Proizvajalci izvozniki, izbrani v končni vzorec, so predstavljali skoraj 60 % navedene količine zadevnega proizvoda, izvoženega v Skupnost.
As far as importers are concerned, and in order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling is necessary, Section 5(a)(ii) of the notice of initiation requested importers in the Community to submit the information specified in this section.
Da bi Komisija lahko v zvezi z uvozniki odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, so uvozniki v Skupnosti morali predložiti informacije iz točke 5(a)(ii) obvestila o začetku.
Only four importers in the Community replied to the sampling form.
Le štirje uvozniki v Skupnosti so izpolnili obrazec za vzorčenje.
Given this low number of cooperating importers no sampling was necessary in this case.
Zaradi majhnega števila sodelujočih uvoznikov vzorčenje v tem primeru ni bilo potrebno.
The Commission sought and verified all information deemed necessary for the determination of dumping.
Komisija je zahtevala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za ugotovitev dampinga.
To this end, the Commission invited all parties known to be concerned and all other parties which made themselves known within the deadlines set out in the notice of initiation to cooperate in the present proceeding and to fill in the relevant questionnaires.
V ta namen je Komisija vse stranke, za katere se ve, da jih to zadeva, in vse druge stranke, ki so se javile v rokih iz obvestila o začetku, povabila k sodelovanju v postopku in jih pozvala, naj odgovorijo na ustrezne vprašalnike.
In this regard, 267 producers and exporters in Norway, the representatives of the Community salmon producers and the Governments of Ireland and Scotland cooperated with the Commission and made their views known.
S Komisijo je sodelovalo in izrazilo svoja stališča 267 proizvajalcev in izvoznikov iz Norveške, predstavniki proizvajalcev lososa Skupnosti ter irska in škotska vlada.
Furthermore, four importers and the six sampled Norwegian exporting producers submitted full questionnaire replies within the deadlines set.
Poleg tega so štirje uvozniki in šest vzorčenih norveških proizvajalcev izvoznikov predložili izpolnjene vprašalnike v določenih rokih.
The Commission carried out verifications at the premises of the following companies:
Komisija je izvedla preveritvene obiske v prostorih naslednjih družb:
importers/processors/users
Uvozniki/predelovalci/uporabniki
Laschinger GmbH, Bischofmais, Germany,
Laschinger GmbH, Bischofmais, Nemčija
Gottfried Friedrichs KG (GmbH & Co.), Hamburg, Germany,
Gottfried Friedrichs KG (GmbH & Co.), Hamburg, Nemčija
Rodé Vis B.V., Urk, The Netherlands,
Rodé Vis B.V., Urk, Nizozemska
Hätälä Oy, Oulu, Finland;
Hätälä Oy, Oulu, Finska
Exporting producers in Norway (Group level)
Proizvajalci izvozniki na Norveškem (skupine družb)
Marine Harvest AS, Bergen, Norway,
Marine Harvest AS, Bergen, Norveška
Hallvard Leroy AS, Bergen, Norway.
Hallvard Leroy AS, Bergen, Norveška
The two largest Norwegian exporting producers, i.e. Marine Harvest AS and Hallvard Leroy AS represented over 44 % of the total production reported by the cooperating Norwegian producers and 45 % of the Norwegian exports to the Community.
Dva največja norveška proizvajalca izvoznika, tj. Marine Harvest AS in Hallvard Leroy AS, sta predstavljala več kot 44 % celotne proizvodnje, ki so jo prijavili sodelujoči norveški proizvajalci, in 45 % norveškega izvoza v Skupnost.
The information supplied by the other four companies selected in the sample was subject to an in-depth desk analysis and it was found that their costs of production and export prices were generally in line with those of the visited companies.
Narejena je bila poglobljena teoretična analiza informacij, ki so jih predložile ostale štiri družbe, izbrane v vzorec, in ugotovljeno je bilo, da se njihovi proizvodni stroški in izvozne cene na splošno ujemajo s proizvodnimi stroški in izvoznimi cenami obiskanih podjetij.
The investigation of dumping covered the period from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2006 (review investigation period or RIP).
Preiskava dampinga je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2006 do 31. decembra 2006 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The product under review is the same as in the original investigation, i.e. farmed (other than wild) salmon, whether or not filleted, fresh, chilled or frozen, originating in Norway (the product concerned).
Proizvod, ki se pregleduje, je enak proizvodu iz prvotne preiskave, tj. gojeni (razen divjega) losos, v filetih ali v drugačni obliki, svež, ohlajen ali zamrznjen, s poreklom iz Norveške („zadevni proizvod“).
The definition excludes other similar farmed fish products such as large (salmon) trout, biomass (live salmon) as well as wild salmon and further processed types such as smoked salmon.
Iz te opredelitve so izključene vse druge podobne gojene ribe, kot so na primer morska postrv (lososova postrv), biomasa (živ losos) in tudi divji losos ter nadalje predelane vrste, kot je na primer prekajeni losos.
The product is currently classifiable within CN codes ex03021200, ex03031100, ex03031900, ex03032200, ex03041913 and ex03042913 corresponding to different presentations of the product (fresh or chilled fish, fresh or chilled fillets, frozen fish and frozen fillets).
Proizvod je sedaj uvrščen pod oznake KN ex03021200, ex03031100, ex03031900, ex03032200, ex03041913 in ex03042913, ki ustrezajo različnim oblikam proizvoda (sveža ali ohlajena riba, sveži ali ohlajeni fileti, zamrznjena riba ali zamrznjeni fileti).
As established in the original investigation and confirmed by this investigation, the product concerned and the product produced and sold on the domestic market in Norway were found to have the same basic physical characteristics and had the same use.
Kot je bilo ugotovljeno v prvotni preiskavi in potrjeno s to preiskavo, imata zadevni proizvod in proizvod, proizveden na Norveškem in prodan na norveškem notranjem trgu, iste osnovne fizikalne značilnosti in isto uporabo.
They were therefore considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se štejeta za podobna proizvoda v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
Since the present review was limited to dumping, no conclusions were reached with regard to the product produced and sold by the Community industry in the Community market.
Ker je bil ta pregled omejen na ugotavljanje dampinga, niso bile v zvezi s proizvodom, ki ga industrija Skupnosti proizvaja in prodaja na trgu Skupnosti, sprejete nobene sklepne ugotovitve.
The Norwegian producers of farmed salmon were making sales of the product concerned to the Community either directly, or via related and unrelated traders.
Norveški proizvajalci gojenega lososa so zadevni proizvod prodajali v Skupnost neposredno ali prek povezanih in nepovezanih trgovcev.
Only identifiable sales destined for the Community market made directly or via related companies based in Norway were used to calculate an export price at the level of the producer.
Pri izračunu izvozne cene na ravni proizvajalca je bila upoštevana samo prodaja, namenjena trgu Skupnosti, ki jo je bilo možno določiti in ki je bila izvedena neposredno ali prek povezanih družb s sedežem na Norveškem.
For the determination of normal value the Commission first established, for each of the exporting producers included in the sample, whether its total domestic sales of farmed salmon were representative in comparison with its total export sales to the Community.
Za določitev normalne vrednosti je Komisija za vsakega proizvajalca izvoznika, vključenega v vzorec, najprej ugotavljala, ali je njegova celotna domača prodaja gojenega lososa reprezentativna v primerjavi z njegovim celotnim izvozom v Skupnost.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, domestic sales were considered representative when the total domestic sales volume of each exporting producer was at least 5 % of its total export sales volume to the Community.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe se je domača prodaja štela za reprezentativno, če je celotni obseg domače prodaje vsakega proizvajalca izvoznika predstavljal vsaj 5 % obsega njegovega celotnega izvoza v Skupnost.
In order to determine whether domestic sales were representative, sales to unrelated traders located in Norway and owning an export licence during the RIP were disregarded since the final destination of these sales could not be established with certainty.
Pri ugotavljanju reprezentativnosti domače prodaje se prodaja nepovezanim trgovcem s sedežem na Norveškem, ki so v OPP imeli izvozno licenco, ni upoštevala, saj ni bilo mogoče z gotovostjo določiti končne destinacije te prodaje.
Indeed, the investigation indicated that these sales were overwhelmingly destined for export to third country markets and therefore not sold for domestic consumption.
Dejansko je bilo s preiskavo ugotovljeno, da je bil velik del te prodaje namenjen izvozu na trge tretjih držav in ne domači potrošnji.
The Commission subsequently identified those product types sold domestically by the companies having overall representative domestic sales, which were identical or directly comparable with the types sold for export to the Community.
Komisija je nato ugotavljala, katere vrste proizvodov, ki so jih družbe z reprezentativno domačo prodajo prodajale na notranjem trgu, so bile enake ali neposredno primerljive z vrstami, prodanimi za izvoz v Skupnost.
Domestic sales of a particular product type were considered as sufficiently representative when the volume of that product type sold on the domestic market to independent customers during the investigation period represented 5 % or more of the total volume of the comparable product type sold for export to the Community.
Domača prodaja posamezne vrste proizvoda se je štela za dovolj reprezentativno, če je obseg prodaje navedene vrste proizvoda neodvisnim strankam na notranjem trgu v obdobju preiskave predstavljal 5 % ali več celotnega obsega prodaje za izvoz v Skupnost primerljive vrste proizvoda.
An examination was also made as to whether the domestic sales of each type of the product concerned sold domestically in representative quantities could be regarded as having been made in the ordinary course of trade in accordance with Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation, by establishing the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers of the type in question.
Prav tako se je z ugotavljanjem deleža dobičkonosne prodaje zadevne vrste neodvisnim kupcem v preiskavi ugotavljalo, ali se domača prodaja posamezne vrste zadevnega proizvoda, prodanega na notranjem trgu v reprezentativnih količinah, lahko šteje za prodajo v običajnem poteku trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
This was done by establishing the proportion of profitable domestic sales to independent customers of each exported product type, on the domestic market during the investigation period, as follows:
To je Komisija izvedla z določitvijo deleža dobičkonosne domače prodaje neodvisnim kupcem za vsako posamezno vrsto izvoženega proizvoda na notranjem trgu v obdobju preiskave.
Where the sales volume of a product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of that type, and where the weighted average price of that type was equal to or above the cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic prices.
Kadar je obseg prodaje določene vrste proizvoda, prodanega po neto prodajni ceni, enaki ali višji od izračunanih proizvodnih stroškov, predstavljal več kot 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje navedene vrste in kadar je bila tehtana povprečna cena navedene vrste enaka ali višja od proizvodnih stroškov, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanskih domačih cenah.
This price was calculated as a weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales of that type made during the RIP, irrespective of whether these sales were profitable or not.
Ta cena je bila izračunana kot tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje navedene vrste v OPP, ne glede na to, ali je bila ta prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne.
Where the volume of profitable sales of a product type represented 80 % or less of the total sales volume of that type, or where the weighted average price of that type was below the cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price, calculated as weighted average of profitable sales of that type only, provided that these sales represented 10 % or more of the total sales volume of that type.
Kadar je obseg dobičkonosne prodaje določene vrste proizvoda predstavljal 80 % ali manj celotnega obsega prodaje navedene vrste ali kadar je bila tehtana povprečna cena navedene vrste nižja od proizvodnih stroškov, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtano povprečje dobičkonosne prodaje izključno navedene vrste, če je ta prodaja predstavljala 10 % ali več celotnega obsega prodaje navedene vrste.
Where the volume of profitable sales of any product type represented less than 10 % of the total sales volume of that type, it was considered that this particular type was sold in insufficient quantities for the domestic price to provide an appropriate basis for the establishment of the normal value.
Kadar je obseg dobičkonosne prodaje katere koli vrste proizvoda predstavljal manj kot 10 % celotnega obsega prodaje navedene vrste, se je štelo, da je bila ta določena vrsta prodana v nezadostnih količinah, da bi bila lahko domača cena primerna podlaga za določitev normalne vrednosti.
Wherever domestic prices of a particular product type sold by an exporting producer could not be used in order to establish normal value, another method had to be applied.
Kadar domačih cen določene vrste proizvoda, ki ga je prodal proizvajalec izvoznik, ni bilo možno uporabiti za določitev normalne vrednosti, je bilo treba uporabiti drugo metodo.
First, it was examined whether normal value could be established on the basis of domestic prices of other producers in Norway in accordance with Article 2(1) of the basic Regulation.
Proučeno je bilo, ali je normalno vrednost možno določiti na podlagi domačih cen drugih proizvajalcev na Norveškem v skladu s členom 2(1) osnovne uredbe.
Since in this case, no more reliable prices of other producers were available, the constructed normal value was used in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
Ker v tem primeru ni bilo na razpolago zanesljivih domačih cen drugih proizvajalcev, je bila v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe uporabljena konstruirana normalna vrednost.
Therefore, in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, the Commission instead calculated a constructed normal value as follows.
Zato je Komisija v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe namesto tega izračunala konstruirano normalno vrednost.
Normal value was constructed by adding to each exporting producer’s manufacturing costs of the exported types, adjusted where necessary, a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) and a reasonable margin of profit.
Normalna vrednost je bila konstruirana tako, da so se po potrebi popravljenim proizvodnim stroškom izvoženih vrst proizvoda posameznega proizvajalca izvoznika prišteli primerni zneski za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške („PSA-stroški“) ter primerna stopnja dobička.
To this end, the Commission examined whether the SG&A incurred and the profit realised by each of the exporting producers concerned on the domestic market constituted reliable data.
V ta namen je Komisija proučila, ali so PSA-stroški ter dobiček, ki ga je ustvaril vsak posamezen zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik na notranjem trgu, zanesljivi.
None of the six exporting producers concerned for which the normal value had to be constructed had representatives domestic sales.
Nobeden od šestih zadevnih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, za katere je bilo treba normalno vrednost konstruirati, ni imel reprezentativne domače prodaje.
Therefore, the method as described in Article 2(6) chapeau could not be used.
Zato metode iz uvoda člena 2(6) ni bilo mogoče uporabiti.
Article 2(6)(a) could not be applied since none of the exporting producers concerned had representative domestic sales.
Člena 2(6)(a) ni bilo možno uporabiti, ker noben zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik ni imel reprezentativne domače prodaje.
Article 2(6)(b) was not applicable either, because sales of the general category of products on the domestic markets were found not to be made in the ordinary course of trade.
Prav tako ni bilo mogoče uporabiti člena 2(6)(b), ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da prodaja proizvodov splošne kategorije na notranjih trgih ni bila izvedena v običajnem poteku trgovine.
Therefore, SG&A and profits were established pursuant to Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation, i.e. on the basis of any other reasonable method.
Zato so bili PSA-stroški in dobiček določeni v skladu s členom 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe, tj. na podlagi katere koli druge primerne metode.