natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The estimate of the social liability does not take into account the repercussions which IFB's bankruptcy would have had on OCHZ IGE for IFB’s social liability.
V oceni socialnih obveznosti niso zajete posledice, ki bi jih imel stečaj IFB za gospodarsko interesno združenje OCHZ in za socialne obveznosti IFB.
The bankruptcy of a member of an IGE automatically leads to the dissolution of the IGE in question.
Stečaj enega člana gospodarskega interesnega združenja namreč neposredno povzroči razpad zadevnega združenja.
SNCB’s staff regulations do not provide the option of dismissing its statutory personnel, except during the probationary period or within the context of a disciplinary procedure.
Pravila v statutu SNCB namreč ne predvidevajo možnosti odpusta oseb, zaposlenih v skladu s kadrovskimi predpisi, razen med pripravništvom ali v okviru disciplinskega postopka.
This value arises from the discounting of cash-flows linked to provisions of EUR 40,8 million forecast in the balance sheet of 31.12.2002.
Ta vrednosti izhaja iz diskontiranih denarnih tokov, povezanih z rezervacijami v višini 40,8 milijona EUR, predvidenih v bilanci na dan 31.12.2002.
See 1999 guidelines, point 36.
Glej smernice iz leta 1999, točka 36.
See notably the guidelines concerning the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty, OJ C 101, 27.4.2004, p. 97, point 24 in particular.
Glej zlasti smernice o uporabi člena 81(3) Pogodbe, UL C 101, 27.4.2004, str. 97, zlasti točka 24.
The average price increase was obtained by weighting the terminals according to their turnover.
Povprečno zvišanje cen je izračunano s ponderiranjem terminalov glede na njihov promet.
IFB was the owner of 368 wagons and had finalised the long-term lease of 376 other wagons.
IFB je imela v lasti 368 vagonov in je sklenila dolgoročne najemne pogodbe za 376 drugih vagonov.
At the beginning of 2006 IFB was the owner of 204 wagons and had finalised the long-term lease of 173 other wagons.
V začetku leta 2006 je imela IFB v lasti 204 vagone in je sklenila dolgoročne najemne pogodbe za 173 drugih vagonov.
This complete opening-up of the markets, which is provided for in Directive 91/440/EC, was implemented by Royal Decree of 13 December 2005.
To popolno odprtje trgov, ki je določeno z Direktivo 91/440/ES, se je izvedlo s kraljevim odlokom z dne 13. decembra 2005.
Court judgment of 16 May 2002, France v Commission, as cited in footnote 13, paragraph 37.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 16. maja 2002 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji, navedena v opombi 12, točka 37.
Court judgment of 16 May 2002, France v Commission, as cited in footnote 13, paragraphs 52 and 55.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 16. maja 2002 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji, navedena v opombi 12, točki 52 in 55.
Court judgment of 16 May 2002, France v Commission, as cited in footnote 13, paragraphs 53 and 54.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 16. maja 2002 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji, navedena v opombi 13, točki 53 in 54.
Court judgment of 16 May 2002, France v Commission, as cited in footnote 13, paragraphs 55 to 57.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 16. maja 2002 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji, navedena v opombi 13, točke od 55 do 57.
Court of Audits: The correct use of public funds by SNCB; audit carried out in implementation of the Resolution by the Chambre des représentants of 11 May 2000; Brussels, May 2001.
Računsko sodišče: Dobra uporaba javnih sredstev s strani SNCB; revizija, opravljena z izvajanjem sklepa Poslanske zbornice z dne 11. maja 2000; Bruselj, maj 2001.
Court judgment of 2 February 1988, Kwekerij Gebroeders van der Kooy BV e.a. v Commission (Cases C-67/85, C-68/85 and 70/85 [1988] 219).
Sodba Sodišča z dne 2. februarja 1988 v zadevi Kwekerij Gebroeders van der Kooy BV in drugi proti Komisiji (C-67/85, C-68/85 in 70/85, ZOdl. 1988, str. 219).
Court judgments of 21 March 1991, Italy v Commission (Cases C-303/88, [1991] I-1433, and C-305/89 [1991] I-1603).
Sodbe Sodišča z dne 21. marca 1991 v zadevi Italija proti Komisiji (C-303/88, ZOdl. 1991, str. I-1433 in C-305/89, ZOdl. 1991, str. I-1603).
Court judgment of 30 January 1985, Commission v France (Case 290/83 [1985] 439).
Sodba Sodišča z dne 30. januarja 1985 v zadevi Komisija proti Franciji (290/83, ZOdl. 1985, str. 439).
Namely the appointment of the directors by the State for the Commission v Italy judgments; the financing by a public establishment, the grant arrangements which correspond to those of ordinary State aid, the presentation by the government of the aid as forming part of a set of State measures for the Commission v France judgment.
Namreč, država imenuje vodilne v sodbah Komisija proti Italiji; financiranje s strani javnega zavoda, način dodelitve je ustrezal dodelitvi navadne državne pomoči, predstavitev pomoči s strani vlade, kot da je del skupine državnih ukrepov v sodbi Komisija proti Franciji.
Commission Decision of 17 September 2003 relating to State aid awarded by Germany in support of Space Park Development GmbH, OJ L 61 of 27.2.2004, p. 66, recital 30.
Odločba Komisije z dne 17. septembra 2003 o državni pomoči, ki jo je Nemčija dodelila Space Park Development GmbH, UL L 61, 27.2.2004, str. 66, uvodna izjava 30.
As a reminder, Article 4 reads as follows: The Parties confirm their intention to implement the following measures insofar as they conform to a restructuring plan approved by their two Boards of Directors, by Belgium and if necessary by the EC, and subject to approval by the shareholders of IFB.
Naj spomnimo, člen 4 se glasi: Pogodbenici potrjujeta svoj namen, da bosta izvajali naslednje ukrepe, če so v skladu z načrtom za prestrukturiranje, ki so ga odobrili oba upravna odbora, Belgija in, če je treba, ES, in pod pogojem, da so jih potrdili delničarji IFB.
Press articles may constitute evidence of imputability, see ABX Logistics decisions, OJ C 9, 14.1.2004, p. 12; Sniace SA, OJ L 108, 30.4.2003, p. 35.
Prispevki v medijih so lahko kazalec vpletenosti, glej odločbo o ABX Logistics, UL C 9, 14.1.2004, str. 12, in odločbo Sniace SA, UL L 108, 30.4.2003, str. 35.
‘Inter Ferry Boats split into two divisions’, uploaded on 19 May 2003 on www.lalibre.be
„Inter Ferry Boats coupée en 2 branches“ objavljen 19. maja 2003 na spletni strani www.lalibre.be
Judgment of 21 March 1991, Italy v Commission, C-305/89, paragraphs 19 and 20.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 21. marca 1991 v zadevi Italija proti Komisiji (C-305/89, točki 19 in 20).
See Commission decision of 7 December 2005, Case C 53/03, Belgium, Restructuring of the company ABX Logistics, paragraph 196 et seq.
Glej odločbo Komisije z dne 7. decembra 2005, primer C 53/03, Belgija, Prestrukturiranje družbe ABX Logistics, točka 196 in naslednje.
See decision to extend the procedure C 53/03, Belgium, ABX Logistics, paragraph 61.
Glej odločbo o razširitvi postopka C 53/03, Belgija, ABX Logistics, točka 61.
See Commission decision of 7 December 2005, Case C 53/03, Belgium, Restructuring of the company ABX Logistics, paragraph 204 et seq.
Glej odločbo Komisije z dne 7. decembra 2005, primer C 53/03, Belgija, Prestrukturiranje družbe ABX Logistics, točka 204 in naslednje.
Court judgment of 13 March 1985, Kingdom of the Netherlands and Leeuwarder Papierwarenfabriek v Commission, (Joint cases 296/82 and 318/82, Rec. 1985, p. 809), paragraph 24.
Sodbe Sodišča z dne 13. marca 1985 v zadevi Kraljevina Nizozemska in Leeuwarder Papierwarenfabriek proti Komisiji (združeni zadevi 296/82 in 318/82, ZOdl. 1985, str. 809), točka 24.
Decision to initiate the formal examination procedure — State Aid C 46/05, paragraph 240.
Odločba o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave - Državna pomoč C 46/05, točka 240.
See Court judgment of 14 September 1994, Spain v Commission, ‘Hytasa’ judgment (Cases C-278/92, C-279/92 and C 208/92 [1999] I-4103), point 22, and Commission decision of 22 July 1998 in the SDBO affair.
Glej sodbo Sodišča z dne 14. septembra 1994 v zadevi Španija proti Komisiji, sodba, imenovana „Hytasa“ (C-278/92, C-279/92 in C 208/92, ZOdl., str. I-4103), točka 22, in odločbo Komisije z dne 22. julija 1998 v zadevi SDBO.
See Commission decision of 5 December 2005, ABX Logistics, Case C 53/03, paragraph 247.
Glej Odločbo Komisije z dne 5. decembra 2005 v zadevi ABX Logistics, spis C 53/03, točka 247.
The upward variations are explained by the need to finance the work in progress and to absorb the difference between receivables and commercial debts and to maintain sufficient liquidity at the beginning of the restructuring period.
Povečanja pojasnjuje potreba po financiranju del, ki so v teku, ter kritju razlike med poslovnimi terjatvami in obveznostmi in ohranitvi zadostnih likvidnih sredstev na začetku obdobja prestrukturiranja. Do znižanj je prišlo na sredini in koncu obdobja prestrukturiranja.
The downward variations occurred in the middle and at the end of the restructuring period: thus, in 2004 and 2005, IFB freed up around EUR 2,7 million by lowering its working capital requirement.
Tako je družba IFB v letih 2004 in 2005 sprostila približno 2,7 milijona EUR z zmanjšanjem svoje potrebe po gibljivih sredstvih.
This was made possible by the recovery of EUR 0,9 million in working capital from OCHZ at the time of the sale of the 50 % shareholding in that company, along with a reduction in the payment period granted to customers as from 2004 in relation to 2003, in combination with an unchanged supplier payment policy.
To je bilo mogoče zaradi izterjave zneska v višini 0,9 milijona EUR v gibljivih sredstvih združenja OCHZ ob prodaji 50-odstotnega deleža v tem združenju in tudi po skrajšanju plačilnega roka, odobrenega strankam od leta 2004 v primerjavi z letom 2003, v povezavi z nespremenjeno politiko plačevanja dobaviteljem.
This result is obtained as follows: EUR 7,685 million (increase in Belgium) + 8000 (increase in France) EUR – 2,687 million (reduction), see table in section 3, paragraph 184.
Ta rezultat je bilo dosežen na naslednji način: 7,685 milijona EUR (povečanje v Belgiji) + 8,000 (povečanje v Franciji) – 2,687 milijona EUR (zmanjšanje), glej tabelo v delu 3, točka 184.
A bilateral meeting on this subject was held with the Belgian authorities on 12 December 2003.
Na to temo je 12. decembra 2003 potekalo dvostransko srečanje z belgijskimi organi.
At this meeting, the IFB restructuring plan was submitted to the Commission.
Na srečanju je bil Komisiji predložen načrt za prestrukturiranje IFB.
The Belgian authorities replied to the Commission’s letter by letter of 7 January 2004, registered as received by the Commission on 13 January 2004 (TREN/A (04)10708).
Belgijski organi so na dopis Komisije odgovorili z dopisom z dne 7. januarja 2004, evidentiranem pri Komisiji 13. januarja 2004 (TREN/A(04)10708).
This letter stated that the measures notified had been introduced.
Iz dopisa izhaja, da so bili priglašeni ukrepi dovoljeni.
A second meeting was held on 30 April 2004.
Drugo srečanje je bilo 30. aprila 2004.
The Belgian authorities sent the additional documents requested by the Commission at this meeting by letter of 15 June 2004, registered as received by the Commission on 21 June 2004 (TREN/A(04)23691).
Belgijski organi so dodatne dokumente, ki jih je na srečanju zahtevala Komisija, poslali v dopisu z dne 15. junija 2004, evidentiranem pri Komisiji 21. junija 2004 (TREN/A(04)23691).
By letter of 28 January 2005 (SG(2005)A1133), the Belgian authorities informed the Commission of SNCB’s intention to further increase IFB’s capital, this not being provided for in the agreements notified on 12 August 2003.
V dopisu z dne 28. januarja 2005 (SG(2005)A1133) so belgijski organi sporočili Komisiji, da namerava SNCB dodatno povečati kapital IFB, kar ni bilo predvideno v dogovorih, priglašenih 12. avgusta 2003.
The Commission recorded this case as notification N 55/05.
Komisija je ta primer evidentirala kot priglasitev pod številko N 55/2005.
A meeting between the Commission and the Belgian authorities was held on 16 September 2005. At the meeting, the Commission asked the Belgian authorities to provide it with further information.
septembra 2005 je bilo delovno srečanje med Komisijo in belgijskimi organi.
This was sent by email on 21 October 2005, registered as received by the Commission on 24 October 2005 (TREN/A(05)27067).
Na srečanju je Komisija od belgijskih organov zahtevala, da ji predložijo dodatne informacije, ki so bile poslane po elektronski pošti 21. oktobra 2005 in evidentirane pri Komisiji 24. oktobra 2005 (TREN/A(05)27067).
By letter of 5 February 2007 (D (07)302095), the Commission asked the Belgian authorities to provide further information.
V dopisu z dne 5. februarja 2007 (D(07)302095) je Komisija pozvala belgijske organe, da ji predložijo dodatne informacije.
Belgium sent this information by letter of 6 February 2007, registered as received by the Commission on 7 February 2007 (A(07)24246), by letter of 8 February 2007, registered as received by the Commission on 9 February 2007 (A(07)23613), by letter of 13 February 2007, registered as received by the Commission on 15 February 2007 (A(07)24201), and by letter of 15 February 2007, registered as received by the Commission on 16 February 2007 (A(07)24362).
Belgija je te informacije poslala z dopisom z dne 6. februarja 2007, evidentiranim pri Komisiji 7. februarja 2007 (A(07)24246), z dopisom z dne 8. februarja 2007, evidentiranim pri Komisiji 9. februarja 2007 (A(07)23613), z dopisom z dne 13. februarja 2007, evidentiranim pri Komisiji 15. februarja 2007 (A(07)24201) in z dopisom z dne 15. februarja 2007, evidentiranim pri Komisiji 16. februarja 2007 (A(07)24362).
By letter of 15 March 2007 (D (07)306248), and at a meeting held on 16 March 2007, the Commission asked the Belgian authorities to provide further information.
V dopisu z dne 15. marca 2007 (D(07)306248) in na delovnem srečanju 16. marca 2007 je Komisija pozvala belgijske organe, da predložijo dodatne informacije.
Belgium sent this information by letter of 30 March 2007, registered as received by the Commission the same day (A (07)28411).
Belgija je te informacije poslala z dopisom z dne 30. marca 2007, evidentiranim pri Komisiji istega dne (A(07)28411).
The Commission established in the decision initiating the procedure (points 50 to 54) that, for IFB Logistics’ activities, it was necessary to distinguish between two different product markets: the shipping activities and the logistics activities.
Komisija je v odločbi o sprožitvi postopka (točke od 50 do 54) ugotovila, da je treba pri dejavnostih IFB Logistics razlikovati dva trga različnih storitev, to je špedicijskih in logističnih dejavnosti.
These markets have been defined as national markets and IFB Logistics’ market share has been calculated as between 2 % and 5 %.
Ta trga sta bila opredeljena kot nacionalna trga, na katerih je bil izračunani tržni delež IFB Logistics med 2 % in 5 %.
Belgium reformed SNCB’s structure on 1 January 2005.
januarja 2005 je Belgija preoblikovala strukturo SNCB.
It was divided into three distinct companies, namely:
Razdelila jo je na tri ločene družbe:
The Management Board is composed of 10 members, including the Chief Executive.
Upravni odbor sestavlja 10 članov, vključno z generalnim direktorjem.
The directors are appointed by the King, by decree debated in the Council of Ministers.
Člane upravnega odbora z odlokom, o katerem odloča svet ministrov, imenuje kralj.
To this is added an operating loss of EUR 1,2 million at the level of the holding in OCHZ.
K temu se doda še 1,2 milijona EUR izgube iz poslovanja na ravni deleža v OCHZ.
These losses, totalling EUR 13,4 million, constitute 12 % of the total losses.
Te izgube v skupni vrednosti 13,4 milijona EUR so predstavljale 12 % skupne izgube.
75 % of these reductions in value and provisions stemmed from IFB’s holdings.
75 % zmanjšanj vrednosti in rezervacij izhaja iz kapitalskih udeležb IFB.
Of this proportion, 76 % concerned the holdings in France.
Od tega jih 76 % zadeva kapitalske udeležbe v Franciji.
In 2001 and especially in 2002, IFB continued this practice, which SNCB tolerated.
Leta 2001 in zlasti 2002 je IFB nadaljevala s tako prakso, ki jo je SNCB dopuščala.
Thus, at the end of January 2003 IFB found itself with unpaid SNCB invoices with a total value of EUR 63 million. The non-payment of these invoices explains why IFB was able to survive despite serious financial difficulties.
Tako je bila konec januarja 2003 skupna vrednost računov SNCB, ki jih IFB ni plačala, 63 milijonov EUR. Neplačilo računov pojasni, zakaj je IFB lahko preživela kljub hudim finančnim težavam.
During the course of this meeting, SNCB, as the majority shareholder stated its commitment to support IFB for the operational expenses by the means of a cash advance of EUR 2,5 million. This commitment by SNCB was approved by SNCB’s Management Board.
Na skupščini je SNCB kot večinska lastnica predstavila zavezo, da bo zagotovila pomoč IFB za odhodke iz poslovanja v obliki gotovinskega predujma v višini 2,5 milijona EUR. To zavezo SNCB je odobril upravni odbor SNCB.
On the basis of this commitment, the shareholders decided provisionally to continue with IFB’s operations and requested that IFB’s Management Board draw up a complete restructuring plan, including the subsidiaries and the management of the terminals.
Na podlagi te zaveze so se delničarji odločili, naj IFB začasno še opravlja svoje dejavnosti in zahtevali od upravnega odbora, da pripravi popoln načrt za prestrukturiranje, ki bo vključeval hčerinske družbe in upravljanje terminalov.
This set of measures was implemented as of the signing of the framework agreement, on 7 April 2003.
Ti ukrepi so se začeli izvajati s podpisom okvirne pogodbe 7. aprila 2003.
However, IFB did not make use of the recoverable advance.
Vendar pa IFB ni uporabila predujma, ki ga je treba vrniti.
The restructuring plan provided for in Article 4 was communicated to the Commission at a meeting with the Belgian authorities on 12 December 2003.
Načrt za prestrukturiranje iz člena 4 je bil predan Komisiji na srečanju z belgijskimi organi 12. decembra 2003.
Its implementation commenced from 2003, and it was completed at the beginning of 2005.
Njegovo izvajanje se je začelo takoj leta 2003 in končalo v začetku leta 2005.
The table has been based on the accounting Statements of 27 September 2002.
Razpredelnica je bila izdelana na podlagi bilanc stanja na dan 27. septembra 2002.
They distinguish between the following amounts:
V njej so navedeni naslednji zneski:
This last sum of EUR 0,5 million corresponds to the flow of funds between IFB’s French shareholdings and IFB between 27 September 2002 and the end of 2002 and must be included in the table in order to be able to reconcile the actual capital depreciation accounted for at the end of 2002 with the total requirement calculated on the basis of the situation on 27 September 2002.
Zadnji znesek 0,5 milijona EUR ustreza tokovom sredstev med francoskimi kapitalskimi udeležbami IFB in IFB od 27. septembra 2002 do konca leta 2002 in mora biti vključen v razpredelnico, da bi lahko uskladili realne računovodske izgube vrednosti konec leta 2002 s skupno izračunano potrebo na podlagi stanja na dan 27. septembra 2002.
As regards the IFB’s borrowing requirement, there is no reason to take account of this amount; IFB’s borrowing requirement relative to the divestiture of its French shareholdings is therefore EUR 38,6 million.
Tega zneska ni treba upoštevati pri potrebah po financiranju IFB; tako IFB za financiranje dezinvesticij v Franciji potrebuje 38,6 milijona EUR.
In return, IFB contributed to an increase in the capital of NFTI-ou, this having become necessary to allow the company to continue operating, amounting to EUR 1,7 million, and conceded part of its share capital to Port Autonome de Dunkerque for the nominal cost of EUR 1.
V zameno je IFB sodelovala pri povečanju kapitala NFTI-ou v višini 1,7 milijona EUR, kar je postalo nujno za nadaljevanje dejavnosti družbe, in prepustila del svojih kapitalskih deležev Port Autonome de Dunkerque za simbolično ceno en euro.
Following this operation, IFB held only 30 % of the share capital.
Po tej transakciji je imela IFB samo še 30 % kapitala družbe.
Belgium then considered that if the measures in question constituted State aid, they should be analysed on the basis of the 1999 guidelines for rescue and restructuring aid, and not on the basis the 2004 guidelines.
Belgija tudi meni, da bi morali zadevne ukrepe, če bi ti pomenili državno pomoč, analizirati na podlagi Smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah iz leta 1999 in ne na podlagi smernic iz leta 2004.
Furthermore, Belgium considered that the measures are compatible with the common market as rescue and restructuring aid.
Poleg tega meni, da so ukrepi združljivi s skupnim trgom kot pomoč za reševanje in pomoč za prestrukturiranje.
In these circumstances, IFB negotiated with the other shareholder, the Independent Port of Dunkerque (PAD):
V teh okolišcinah je IFB na pogajanjih z drugim delničarjem Port Autonome de Dunkerque („PAD“) dosegla:
An increase in the capital of NFTIou part of which was underwritten by IFB,
povečanje kapitala NFTIou, del katerega je vpisala družba IFB;
The release of IFB from its commitments issued in the letter of intent, and PAD’s commitment to seek a buyer for the balance of IFB’s shareholding in NFTIou, by means of the transfer of a nominal sum to PAD for a part of IFB’s shareholding in NFTIou to be reduced to 30 % (including the shareholding in DPD).
odpravo obveznosti IFB, ki so izhajale iz pisma o nameri, ter zavezo PAD, da bo poiskala kupca za preostali delež IFB v NFTIou, s tem da se za simbolično ceno prenese na PAD del kapitalske udeležbe IFB v NFTIou, da bi se tako znižala na 30 % (vkljucno z deležem, ki ga je imela prek DPD)
The sale of the remaining 30 % shareholding is currently in progress.
Prodaja preostalega 30-odstotnega deleža še poteka.
SSTD: Cession
SSTD: Prenos
Belgium determined IFB’s net current value from IFB’s balance sheet of 31 December 2002.
Belgija je določila neto diskontirano vrednost IFB na podlagi bilance stanja IFB na dan 31. decembra 2002.
According to the Belgian authorities, the value of IFB’s fixed assets which could theoretically have been realised if IFB had filed for bankruptcy in January 2003 included tangible fixed assets and financial fixed assets (shareholdings).
Po mnenju belgijskih organov bi vrednost osnovnih sredstev IFB, ki bi jih lahko vnovčili, če bi družba IFB razglasila stečaj januarja 2003, vsebovala opredmetena osnovna sredstva in finančne naložbe (kapitalske udeležbe).
These liabilities rose to a total of EUR 76,9 million, not counting the debts of EUR 63 million in respect of SNCB for unpaid invoices from the period 2000–02.
Te obveznosti so znašale skupno 76,9 milijona EUR brez dolga do SNCB v višini 63 milijonov EUR, ki je nastal zaradi neplačanih računov v obdobju 2000 – 2002.
They are detailed below:
V nadaljevanju so natančno opisane:
Provisions and deferred taxes: a sum of EUR 34,7 million has been retained, from a total of EUR 40,8 million recorded from liabilities on the balance sheet of 31 December 2002.
rezervacije in odloženi davki: upoštevali so znesek 34,7 milijona EUR od skupno 40,8 milijona EUR bilančnih obveznosti na dan 31. decembra 2002.
This variance is explained by the following items which would not have been a liability in the event of the liquidation of IFB:
Razliko pojasnijo naslednje postavke, ki jih v primeru likvidacije IFB ne bi smeli prevzeti:
On the other hand, around 480 FTE of SNCB whose employment depended on IFB remaining in business.
približno 480 EPDČ v SNCB, katerih dejavnost je bila odvisna od nadaljevanja dejavnosti IFB.
This estimate is obtained from the following calculation.
Ta ocena izhaja iz naslednjega izračuna.
Consequently, the Belgian Government proposed to add the cost of the surplus staff thus generated for SNCB to the direct cost of the negative net value of IFB, at least during the five-year period from 2003 to 2007.
Zato belgijska vlada predlaga, da se neposrednim stroškom negativne neto vrednosti sredstev IFB prištejejo stroški presežnih zaposlenih, ki bi nastali v SNCB v najmanj petih letih od 2003 do 2007.