natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, Alitalia’s very precarious financial situation as at the date of granting of the measure in question demonstrates the failure of the restructuring plan notified to the Commission in 2004, which was the subject of the latter’s decision of 7 June 2005 [48].
Zelo ogrožen finančni položaj družbe Alitalia na dan odobritve zadevnega ukrepa poleg tega dokazuje neuspeh načrta za prestrukturiranje, ki je bil Komisiji priglašen leta 2004 in je bil predmet njene odločbe z dne 7. junija 2005 [48].
The support measures granted to Alitalia by the Italian authorities in recent years are further proof of the recurrent nature of this precarious financial situation (see section 7 above) [49].
Ukrepi podpore, ki so jih italijanski organi v zadnjih letih odobrili družbi Alitalia, poleg tega kažejo na ponavljajoče se finančne težave družbe (glej oddelek 7 zgoraj) [49].
In this context, the very difficult situation facing the air transport sector, which is linked in particular to an acceleration in the increase in the price of oil during the first six months of 2008, does not, on its own, explain the particularly precarious financial situation of Alitalia for many years.
V teh okoliščinah sedanje težke gospodarske razmere v letalskem sektorju, povezane predvsem z vse hitrejšo rastjo cen nafte v prvi polovici leta 2008, ne morejo pojasniti izjemno težavnega finančnega položaja, v katerem je družba Alitalia že vrsto let.
It should be recalled, in this connection, that, according to the aforementioned Decree-Law No 80 of 23 April 2008, the reason for granting the loan was the company’s financial situation and its immediate liquidity need and that Decree-Law No 93 was adopted as a result of the company’s worsening financial situation and was intended to enable it to safeguard its value, thereby ensuring that it remained in business [50].
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da sta, sodeč po zgoraj navedenem zakonskem odloku št. 80 z dne 23. aprila 2008, razloga za odobritev zadevnega posojila finančni položaj družbe in njena takojšnja potreba po likvidnih sredstvih ter da je bil zakonski odlok št. 93 sprejet zaradi poslabšanja finančnega položaja družbe ter za zagotovitev ohranjanja njene vrednosti in nadaljevanja dejavnosti [50].
While there is thus no doubt that the current economic situation is contributing to accentuating the difficulties facing Alitalia, the fact remains that its economic difficulties existed earlier and, moreover, that the current situation affects all air carriers.
Čeprav ni nobenega dvoma, da so težave družbe Alitalia še večje zaradi sedanjih gospodarskih razmer, pa tudi drži, da je imela gospodarske težave že prej in da so zaradi teh gospodarskih razmer prizadeti vsi letalski prevozniki.
Accordingly, in the case in point, it is not possible to derogate from the ‘one time, last time’ principle of the 2004 guidelines.
Iz tega sledi, da v okoliščinah tega primera ni mogoče odstopati od načela o enkratni pomoči iz smernic iz leta 2004.
Italy’s reference to the Bull Decision does not cast doubt on this analysis.
Sklicevanje Italije na odločbo o družbi Bull te ugotovitve ne more ovreči.
In that Decision, the Commission considered that, in the specific circumstances of the case in point, the ‘one time, last time’ principle did not prevent authorisation of the aid notified by France, even though the period of ten years before granting of new restructuring aid had not passed.
V navedeni odločbi je Komisija menila, da v posebnih okoliščinah obravnavanega primera merilo o enkratni pomoči („one time, last time“) ne nasprotuje odobritvi pomoči, ki jo je priglasila Francija, čeprav pogoj desetletnega roka pred dodelitvijo nove pomoči za prestrukturiranje ni bil izpolnjen.
According to the Commission in that Decision, the philosophy of that principle, namely to prevent any unfair support, had been respected, since France had not propped Bull up artificially in the face of difficulties of a recurrent nature.
Po mnenju Komisije je bila v navedeni odločbi osnovna misel tega načela, to je preprečiti kakršno koli zlorabo podpore, upoštevana, saj Francija družbe Bull ni umetno ohranjala pri življenju, čeprav naj bi se njene težave ponavljale.
The Commission also points out that, under the 2004 guidelines, in order to prevent firms from being unfairly assisted when they can survive only thanks to repeated State support, rescue or restructuring aid should be granted once only (see paragraph 72).
Komisija poudarja tudi, da iz smernic iz leta 2004 izhaja, da se za preprečitev krivične pomoči podjetjem, ki lahko preživijo zgolj zaradi ponavljajoče se državne podpore, pomoč za reševanje ali prestrukturiranje lahko dodeli le enkrat (glej odstavek 72).
Furthermore, unlike the specific circumstances of the Bull case [52], the difficulties facing Alitalia and used to justify granting of the measure in question are not, as has previously been noted, linked to the current unfavourable situation in the air transport sector.
Poleg tega v nasprotju s posebnimi okoliščinami zadeve Bull [52] težave, s katerimi se je srečevala družba Alitalia in ki so bile razlog za odobritev zadevne pomoči, niso, kot je bilo predhodno ugotovljeno, povezane s sedanjimi gospodarskimi razmerami, ki so neugodne za sektor letalskega prometa.
Moreover, these difficulties are undoubtedly of the same nature as those which the company previously faced, as demonstrated by the description of its financial situation since 1997 (see recitals 57 and 58 above) and, unlike the facts in the Bull case [53], are recurrent in nature.
Poleg tega so te težave enake tistim, s katerimi se je podjetje že srečevalo, kot izhaja iz opisa finančnega položaja od leta 1997 (glej uvodni izjavi 57 in 58), in se v nasprotju z dejanskim stanjem v zadevi Bull [53] ponavljajo.
Lastly, contrary to what the Commission noted in the Bull Decision [54], Alitalia received both restructuring aid and rescue aid in the form of a State guarantee, and the period which has been running since the granting of these aid measures is not close to completion.
Alitalia je v nasprotju s tem, kar je Komisija ugotovila v odločbi o družbi Bull [54], hkrati prejela pomoč za prestrukturiranje in pomoč za reševanje v obliki poroštva države, pogoj izteka desetletnega roka od odobritve teh pomoči pa še zdaleč ni izpolnjen.
It follows from this that, even supposing that the other cumulative conditions under the 2004 guidelines allowing the loan in question to be considered rescue aid had been satisfied — which is not the case — the condition linked to the ‘one time, last time’ principle has not been satisfied in the case in point and it is not possible to derogate therefrom by applying one of the exceptions provided for in paragraph 73 of the guidelines.
Iz tega sledi, da tudi ob predpostavki, da so drugi kumulativni pogoji iz smernic iz leta 2004, na podlagi katerih je zadevno posojilo mogoče šteti za pomoč za reševanje, izpolnjeni, kar v tem primeru ne velja, ni izpolnjen pogoj v zvezi z načelom o enkratni pomoči, od njega pa ni mogoče odstopati z uporabo ene od izjem iz točke 73 navedenih smernic.
It follows from all of the foregoing that the aid measure in question is not compatible with the common market.
Iz zgoraj navedenega izhaja, da zadevna pomoč ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The Commission would point out that, pursuant to Article 14(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 (now Article 88) of the EC Treaty [55], any aid which is unlawful and incompatible with the common market must be recovered from the beneficiary.
Komisija opozarja, da mora upravičenec na podlagi člena 14(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (zdaj člen 88 Pogodbe) [55] vrniti vsako nezakonito pomoč, ki je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
Since the measure in question was granted unlawfully to Alitalia and is incompatible with the common market, it must be recovered from it [56].
Ker je bila zadevna pomoč družbi Alitalia odobrena nezakonito in ker je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom, jo mora Alitalia vrniti [56].
The Commission would point out again that, given Alitalia’s very precarious financial situation and the conditions for granting of the measure in question, a private investor would not have agreed to grant it any loan, much less a loan the value of which is to be counted as part of its capital.
Komisija opozarja, da glede na resne finančne težave družbe Alitalia in pogoje odobritve zadevne pomoči zasebni vlagatelj ne bi privolil v odobritev nikakršnega posojila tej družbi in sploh pa ne posojila, katerega znesek se vključi v njen lastniški kapital.
Given the nature of the measure in question and the circumstances of its granting, the Commission believes that the aid to be recovered is the entirety of the loan.
Ob upoštevanju narave zadevnega ukrepa in okoliščin njegove odobritve Komisija meni, da je treba vrniti celotno posojilo.
For the purposes of such recovery, account must also be taken of interest, from the date on which the aid in question was made available to the company, i.e. 22 April 2008, until the date of actual recovery [57].
Za namen tega vračila je poleg tega treba upoštevati obresti, ki tečejo od dneva, ko je bila zadevna pomoč dana na razpolago družbi, to je od 22. aprila 2008, do njene dejanske izterjave [57].
The Commission finds that Italy has unlawfully implemented an aid measure comprising a loan of EUR 300 million granted to Alitalia, which can be counted as part of the company’s capital, contrary to Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je Italija v nasprotju s členom 88(3) Pogodbe družbi Alitalia nezakonito odobrila pomoč v obliki posojila v višini 300 milijonov EUR, ki se lahko vključi v njen lastniški kapital.
In consequence, Italy must take all the necessary measures to recover this State aid which is incompatible with the common market.
Zato mora Italija sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za vračilo te državne pomoči, ki je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
It must recover this aid from its beneficiary, namely Alitalia,
Pomoč mora vrniti njen upravičenec, to je družba Alitalia –
The EUR 300 million loan granted to Alitalia and capable of being counted as part of its capital, which was implemented by Italy contrary to Article 88(3) of the Treaty, is incompatible with the common market.
Posojilo v višini 300 milijonov EUR, ki ga je Italija v nasprotju s členom 88(3) Pogodbe odobrila družbi Alitalia in ga ta lahko vključi v lastniški kapital, je nezdružljivo s skupnim trgom.
Italy shall recover the aid referred to in Article 1 from the beneficiary.
Italija od upravičenca izterja pomoč iz člena 1.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were made available to the beneficiary until they are actually recovered.
Za zneske, ki jih je treba izterjati, se od datuma, ko so bili dani na razpolago upravičencem, do datuma dejanske izterjave zaračunavajo obresti.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Obresti se izračunajo na podlagi obrestnoobrestnega računa v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004 in Uredbo (ES) št. 271/2008 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004.
Recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 shall be immediate and effective.
Izterjava pomoči iz člena 1 je takojšnja in učinkovita.
Italy shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of its notification.
Italija zagotovi, da se ta odločba izvede v štirih mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tej odločbi.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Italy shall notify the following information to the Commission:
Italija v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tej odločbi Komisiji predloži naslednje podatke:
the total amount (principal and interest) to be recovered from the beneficiary;
skupni znesek (glavnica in obresti na terjatev), ki ga je treba izterjati od upravičenca;
a detailed description of the measures already taken and those planned to comply with this Decision;
podroben opis že sprejetih ali načrtovanih ukrepov za uskladitev s to odločbo;
Italy shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until complete recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1.
Italija obvešča Komisijo o napredku nacionalnih ukrepov, sprejetih za izvajanje te odločbe, do dokončne izterjave pomoči iz člena 1.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, any information on the measures already taken and those planned to comply with this Decision.
Na zahtevo Komisije takoj predloži informacije o že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepih za uskladitev s to odločbo.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and interest already recovered from the beneficiary.
Prav tako predloži podrobne podatke o zneskih pomoči in obresti na terjatev, ki so bili od upravičenca že izterjani.
OJ C 184, 22.7.2008, p. 34.
UL C 184, 22.7.2008, str. 34.
Decreto-legge no 80, Misure urgenti per assicurare il pubblico servizio di trasporto aereo (Official Gazette of the Italian Republic No 97, 24.4.2008).
Decreto-legge no80, Misure urgenti per assicurare il pubblico servizio di trasporto aereo (GU No 97 del 24/04/2008). (Zakonski odlok št. 80 – Nujni ukrepi za zaščito zračnega prometa (Uradni list št. 97 z dne 24. 4 2008)).
Decreto-legge no 93, Misure urgenti per assicurare il pubblico servizio di trasporto aereo (Official Gazette of the Italian Republic No 127, 28.5.2008).
Decreto-legge no 93, Disposizioni urgenti per salvaguardare il potere di acquisto delle famiglie (GU No 127 del 28/05/2008). (Zakonski odlok št. 93 – Nujni ukrepi za ohranitev kupne moči družin (Uradni list št. 127 z dne 28.5.2008)).
OJ C 319, 29.12.2007, p. 6.
UL C 319, 29.12.2007, str. 6.
The measure covered by this Decision is based on the aforementioned Decree-Laws Nos 80 and 93.
Ukrep, ki je predmet te odločbe, temelji na zgoraj navedenih zakonskih odlokih št. 80 in 93.
Commission Decision of 11 June 2008, previously cited, recital 7.
Odločitev Komisije z dne 11. junija 2008, glej uvodno izjavo 7.
OJ L 342, 24.12.2005, p. 81.
UL L 342, 24.12.2005, str. 81.
OJ L 322, 25.11.1997, p. 44.
UL L 322, 25.11.1997, str. 44.
OJ L 271, 12.10.2001, p. 28.
UL L 271, 12.10.2001, str. 28.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 December 2000 in Case T-296/97, Alitalia v Commission (ECR II-3871).
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 12. decembra 2000 v zadevi Alitalia proti Komisiji (T-296/97, Recueil, str. II-3871).
The appeal lodged by Alitalia against the Commission Decision of 18 July 2001 was rejected by the Court of First Instance in its judgment of 9 July 2008 in Case T-301/01, Alitalia v Commission (not yet published in the ECR).
Sodišče prve stopnje je tožbo, ki jo je družba Alitalia vložila zoper odločbo Komisije z dne 18. julija 2001, zavrnilo s sodbo z dne 9. julija 2008 v zadevi Alitalia proti Komisiji, T-301/01 (še neobjavljeno v ZOdl.).
An action for annulment of this Decision has been submitted by Air One and is currently pending before the Court of First Instance (Case T-344/02).
Družba Air One je vložila ničnostno tožbo zoper to odločbo, postopek pred Sodiščem prve stopnje pa še teče (zadeva T-344/02).
OJ L 69, 8.3.2006, p. 1.
UL L 69, 8.3.2006, str. 1.
See, for example, the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-222/04, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze v Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze (ECR I-289, paragraph 129).
Glej na primer sodbo Sodišča z dne 10. januarja 2006 v zadevi Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze proti Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze (C-222/04, ZOdl., str. I-289, točka 129).
See, inter alia, the judgment of the Court of Justice of 14 September 1994 in Cases C-278/92, C-279/92 and C-280/92, Spain v Commission (ECR I-4103, paragraphs 20 to 22).
Glej zlasti sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 14. septembra 1994 v zadevi Španija proti Komisiji C-278/92, C-279/92 in C-280/92, Recueil, str. I-4103, točke od 20 do 22.
See, for example, the judgment of the Court of Justice of 21 March 1991 in Case C-303/88, Italy v Commission (ECR I-1433, paragraphs 21 and 22).
Glej na primer sodbo Sodišča z dne 21. marca 1991 v zadevi Italija proti Komisiji C-303/88, Recueil, str. I-1433, točki 21 in 22.
See, for example, the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 October 2005 in case T-318/00, Freistaat Thüringen v Commission (ECR II-4179, paragraph 125).
Glej na primer sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 19. oktobra 2005 v zadevi Freistaat Thüringen proti Komisiji T-318/00, ZOdl., str. II-4179, točka 125.
Data sent by the Italian authorities in their letter of 30 May 2008 to the Commission.
Podatki, ki so jih italijanski organi poslali Komisiji v dopisu z dne 30. maja 2008.
See the financial results available on Alitalia’s website (http://corporate.alitalia.com/en/investors/financial/index.aspx).
Glej finančne rezultate, ki so na voljo na spletni strani družbe Alitalia (http://corporate.alitalia.com/en/investors/financial/index.aspx).
Decreto-legge no 97, Disposizioni urgenti in materia di monitoraggio e trasparenza dei meccanismi di allocazione della spesa pubblica, nonché in materia fiscale e di proroga di termini (Official Gazette of the Italian Republic No 128 of 3 June 2008).
Decreto-legge no97, Disposizioni urgenti in materia di monitoraggio e trasparenza dei meccanismi di allocazione della spesa pubblica, nonche’ in materia fiscale e di proroga di termini (GU No128 del 3/06/2008). (Zakonski odlok št. 97 – Nujni ukrepi v zvezi s spremljanjem in preglednostjo mehanizmov za dodelitev javnih sredstev ter v zvezi z davki in podaljšanjem rokov (Uradni list št. 128 z dne 3.6.2008)).
See paragraph 9 of the letter from the Italian authorities to the Commission dated 12 July 2008.
Glej odstavek 9 dopisa italijanskih organov Komisiji z dne 12. julija 2008.
See recital 12 above.
Glej uvodno izjavo 12.
See recital 5 above.
Glej uvodno izjavo 5.
Previously cited, see footnote 6.
Navedeno v opombi 6.
See footnote 6.
Navedeno v opombi 6.
A public share swap offer was submitted to Alitalia on 14 March 2008 and approved by its management board on 16 March 2008.
Družba Alitalia je dobila ponudbo za prevzem z zamenjavo delnic 14. marca 2008, upravni odbor pa jo je odobril 16. marca 2008.
See the previously cited letter from the Italian authorities to the Commission dated 30 May 2008.
Glej zgoraj navedeni dopis italijanskih organov Komisiji z dne 30. maja 2008.
As stated in the Alitalia press release of 13 May 2008: ‘The Board expressed its appreciation for the communication from Mr Bruno Ermolli and awaits a clear statement of intent which proves to be in line with the above indications in order to agree to the requested due diligence’ (http://corporate.alitalia.com/en/press/press/index.aspx).
V sporočilu družbe Alitalia za javnost z dne 13. maja 2008 je navedeno: „The Board expressed its appreciation for the communication from Mr Bruno Ermolli and awaits a clear statement of intent which proves to be in line with the above indications in order to agree to the requested due diligence.“ ( „Upravni svet ceni sporočilo gospoda Bruna Ermollija in pričakuje jasno izjavo o nameri, ki ustreza zgornjim navedbam, za privolitev v zahtevani preskus o potrebni skrbnosti.“) (http://corporate.alitalia.com/en/press/press/index.aspx).
See, for example, judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 September 1998 in Cases T-126/96 and T-127/96, Breda Fucine Meridionali v Commission (ECR II-3437, paragraph 79).
Glej na primer sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 15. septembra 1998 v zadevi Breda Fucine Meridionali proti Komisiji (T-126/96 in T-127/96, Recueil, str. II-3437, točka 79).
See, for example, judgment of the Court of Justice of 11 July 1996 in Case C-39/94, SFEI (ECR 3547, paragraph 60).
Glej na primer sodbo Sodišča z dne 11. julija 1996 v zadevi SFEI (C-39/94, Recueil, str. II-3547, točka 60).
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 of 23 July 1992 on licensing of air carriers, Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community carriers to intra-Community air routes, Council Regulation (EEC) No 2409/92 of 23 July 1992 on fares and rates for air services (OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1).
Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2407/92 z dne 23. julija 1992 o licenciranju letalskih prevoznikov, št. 2408/92 z dne 23. julija 1992 o dostopu letalskih prevoznikov Skupnosti do letalskih prog znotraj Skupnosti in št. 2409/92 z dne 23. julija 1992 o prevozninah in tarifah za zračni prevoz (UL L 240, 24.8.1992, str. 1).
See paragraph 25(b) of the 2004 guidelines.
Glej točko 25(b) smernic iz leta 2004.
See paragraph 25(c) of the 2004 guidelines.
Glej točko 25(c) smernic iz leta 2004.
See section 3.1.1, paragraph 25(e) and section 3.3 of the 2004 guidelines.
Glej točko 25(e) oddelka 3.1.1 in oddelek 3.3 smernic iz leta 2004.
Commission Decision of 18 July 2001 (previously cited, recital 47).
Odločba Komisije z dne 18. julija 2001 (navedena v uvodni izjavi 47).
Commission Decision of 20 July 2004 (previously cited, recital 47).
Odločba Komisije z dne 20. julija 2004 (navedena v uvodni izjavi 47).
The Decision of 18 July 2001 states the following: ‘[F]or, despite the improvements following adjustments to the restructuring plan in February and June 1997, as notified to the Commission on 26 June 1997, Alitalia must still be considered a company with a very high specific risk.
Tako je v odločbi z dne 18. julija 2001 navedeno naslednje: „Kljub izboljšanju po prilagoditvah načrta februarja in junija 1997, ki so bile Komisiji priglašene 26. junija 1997, je družbo Alitalia še vedno treba šteti za podjetje z zelo velikim posebnim tveganjem.
In this respect, it should be noted that: […] the company is in an extremely difficult and precarious financial situation.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da: (…) je družba v zelo težkem in negotovem finančnem položaju.
With its own resources at virtually zero at the beginning of 1996 and a high level of indebtedness, the company only avoided bankruptcy thanks to a capital injection of ITL 1000 billion in June 1996. Considering the size of the company and the anticipated amount of the investment, this insecure financial situation is a factor which may in itself discourage any investor operating according to the principles of the market economy.’
Samo dokapitalizacija v višini 1000 milijard ITL junija 1996 ji je namreč omogočila, da se je izognila stečaju, saj so bila njena lastna sredstva spomladi 1996 praktično nična, njena zadolženost pa velika.
It can also be seen from the Decision of 20 July 2004 that, after 2001, Alitalia’s financial situation continued to be worrying, and that an indication of the increasing seriousness of the situation was that the company’s shares were suspended on 4 May 2004 after falling by 15 % to EUR 0,1995 and that Alitalia’s auditors had noted a deterioration in its financial situation and indicated that, in the absence of incisive and appropriate measures, this financial situation would mean that a new solution, including possibly liquidation, would have to be found.
Ob upoštevanju velikosti družbe in predvidenega zneska naložbe lahko tako neravnovesje finančne strukture podjetja samo po sebi odvrne vlagatelja, ki deluje po načelih tržnega gospodarstva.“ Poleg tega iz odločbe z dne 20. julija 2004 izhaja, da položaj družbe Alitalia od leta 2001 še naprej vzbuja skrb, da je znak vse večje resnosti položaja, da je bilo trgovanje z delnicami ustavljeno v torek, 4. maja 2004, potem ko so padle za 15 % na 0,1995 EUR, in da je revizorska družba družbe Alitalia ugotovila poslabšanje njenega finančnega položaja in navedla, da bo, če ne bodo sprejeti ostri in ustrezni ukrepi, ta finančni položaj zahteval nove rešitve, vključno z likvidacijo.
Lastly, see the Decision of 7 June 2005, where the company’s situation as at July 2004 is referred to again.
Glej nazadnje odločbo z dne 7. junija 2005, v kateri je predstavljen položaj družbe iz julija 2004.