natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The estimation in the original case was a maximum increase of consumer prices by 2 %, or EUR 1 per pair.
Ocena v prvotnem primeru je bila zvišanje potrošniških cen za največ 2 % oz. 1 EUR na par.
The results of the review investigation indeed demonstrate that consumer prices of leather shoes only increased slightly since the imposition of the measures (see recitals 463 et seqq.).
Rezultat preiskave zaradi izteka ukrepov je dejansko pokazal, da so se med uvedbo ukrepov potrošniške cene usnjene obutve le rahlo zvišale (glej uvodne izjave (463) in naprej).
The increase in average shoe retail prices as reported by the national statistical offices of the group of representative Member States mentioned in those recitals and in table 23 is between –0,5 % and +4,1 %, which is lower than the reported inflation in that period.
Zvišanje povprečnih maloprodajnih cen obutve, kakor so ga sporočili nacionalni statistični uradi skupine reprezentativnih držav članic, navedenih v teh uvodnih izjavah in preglednici 23, je med – 0,5 % in + 4,1 %, kar je nižje od sporočene inflacije v zadevnem obdobju.
On the basis of the analysis of import prices, it was also established that prices of leather footwear from the PRC and Vietnam remained relatively low, even after adding the anti-dumping duties (see recital 422 above).
Na podlagi analize uvoznih cen je bilo tudi ugotovljeno, da so cene usnjene obutve iz LRK in Vietnama ostale razmeroma nizke tudi po uvedbi protidampinških dajatev (glej uvodno izjavo (422)).
Therefore, from the information on the file, it does not appear that the measures have harmed consumers to a significant degree.
Zato iz informacij v dokumentaciji ni razvidno, da bi ukrepi bistveno škodili potrošnikom.
Several interested parties argued that the measures were harmful to the consumers, and that they have resulted in higher prices.
Več zainteresiranih strank je trdilo, da so ukrepi škodili potrošnikom in da so se odražali v višjih cenah.
It was also argued by certain importers that the impact of the measures on consumers would become much more noticeable now that they could not longer absorb the duties.
Nekateri uvozniki so tudi trdili, da se bo učinek ukrepov na potrošnike zdaj okrepil, saj ne morejo več absorbirati dajatev.
As mentioned in recital 482 above, there anti-dumping duties appear not to have resulted in a noticeable increase of retail prices.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (482), se ne zdi, da bi protidampinške dajatve povzročile opazno zvišanje maloprodajnih cen.
As regards the alleged inability of importers to absorb the duties, the post-RIP analysis gives already some indications in that respect.
Glede domnevne nezmožnosti uvoznikov, da bi absorbirali dajatve, analiza obdobja po OPP v zvezi s tem že navaja nekaj kazalnikov.
Indeed, as explained in recital 438 above, during the period July 2008 to March 2009 the importers’ purchase prices increased strongly whereas their resale prices remained stable or increased slightly at most.
Kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (438), so se med julijem 2008 in marcem 2009 nabavne cene uvoznikov močno zvišale, medtem ko so njihove cene pri nadaljnji prodaji ostale stabilne ali so se samo rahlo zvišale.
That information suggests that importers would not necessarily need to pass on any cost increase to the next level in the distribution chain.
Ta podatek kaže, da uvoznikom ni bilo treba nujno prenesti zvišanja stroškov na naslednjo raven distribucijske verige.
One interested party claimed that the measures would result/had resulted in a reduced choice of leather footwear for consumers, notably a lack of middle/to low end leather shoes at affordable prices.
Ena zainteresirana stranka je trdila, da so ukrepi privedli do/bodo privedli do zmanjšane ponudbe usnjene obutve za potrošnike zaradi pomanjkanja srednjega do nižjega segmenta usnjene obutve po dostopnih cenah.
This claim had already been made during the original investigation.
Ta trditev je bila podana že med prvotno preiskavo.
The above claim was not substantiated.
Zgornja trditev ni bila ustrezno podkrepljena z dokazi.
Moreover, in view of the stable retail prices over a long period in time, it is unlikely that consumers would loose interest in the product in question for reasons of price evolution.
Poleg tega je zaradi dolgotrajnih stabilnih maloprodajnih cen malo verjetno, da bi potrošniki izgubili zanimanje za zadevni izdelek zaradi gibanja cen.
It is also noted that apart from one association which claimed that measures would have led to less choice for consumers without substantiating this argument by evidence, no other retailer or retail association complained about reduced choice or a shortage of supply.
Prav tako se ugotavlja, da se, razen enega združenja, ki je trdilo, da bi ukrepi privedli do manjše izbire za potrošnika, ni pa svoje trditve utemeljilo z dokazi, noben prodajalec na drobno ali združenje trgovcev na drobno ni pritožilo glede zmanjšane ponudbe ali pomanjkanja ponudbe.
Even if the investigation has confirmed that the choice of consumers has slightly shifted away from the product in question, given the modest decrease of consumption of leather shoes observed during the period considered and the increased demand for textile shoes, this can however be attributed to changing fashion trends rather than to a reduced choice of leather footwear.
Čeprav je preiskava potrdila, da se je izbira potrošnikov rahlo odmaknila od zadevnega izdelka glede na zabeleženo rahlo zmanjšanje potrošnje usnjene obutve v zadevnem obdobju in povečano povpraševanje po tekstilni obutvi, se lahko to pripiše spreminjajočim se modnim trendom in ne zmanjšani ponudbi usnjene obutve.
CONCLUSION ON UNION INTEREST
SKLEP O INTERESU UNIJE
It follows from the above that a significant part of the Union industry producers has improved its situation since the imposition of anti-dumping measures and has proven its viability by adapting their business models to the challenges of the globalised market.
Iz zgoraj navedenega sledi, da je po uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov velik del proizvajalcev industrije Unije izboljšal svoj položaj in dokazal sposobnost preživetja s prilagoditvijo poslovnih modelov na izzive globaliziranega trga.
Should measures be maintained, they will allow for more time to continue this process.
Če bodo ukrepi ohranjeni, bodo omogočili več časa za nadaljevanje tega postopka.
Should measures lapse, the price pressure of the dumped imports on the mid to low end products will likely impact also on the higher end products and eventually affect all leather footwear.
V primeru izteka ukrepov bo cenovni pritisk dampinškega uvoza na izdelke nižje do srednje vrednosti verjetno vplival na izdelke višje vrednosti in nazadnje na vso usnjeno obutev.
In this scenario, it is likely that more Union producers will go into bankruptcy given that due to their predominant small to medium size, they are financially more vulnerable.
Po tem scenariju je verjetno, da bo šlo več proizvajalcev Unije v stečaj, saj gre večinoma za finančno ranljivejša mala in srednje velika podjetja.
On the other hand, the impact of the anti-dumping duties from 2006 until the RIP on importers, retailers/distributors and consumers was not disproportionate.
Po drugi strani vpliv protidampinških dajatev na uvoznike, trgovce na drobno/distributerje in potrošnike od leta 2006 do OPP ni bil nesorazmeren.
Should measures continue and assuming that consumer demand will further weaken in the wake of the economic crisis, the impact of the anti-dumping duties on all players will in all likelihood be higher than in the past.
Če se bodo ukrepi nadaljevali in ob domnevi, da se bo zaradi gospodarske krize povpraševanje potrošnikov še naprej manjšalo, bo učinek protidampinških dajatev na vse akterje verjetno večji kot v preteklosti.
However, given the generally healthy state and proven flexibility of the importers and the general strong market position of retailers/distributors that can diversify their product mix considerably, it can be assumed that those operators will not disproportionately suffer in the short to medium term.
Vendar glede na splošno zdravo stanje in dokazano prilagodljivost uvoznikov ter na splošno močan tržni položaj trgovcev na drobno/distributerjev, ki lahko znatno razširijo svojo ponudbo blaga, se lahko domneva, da ti proizvajalci kratko- do srednjeročno ne bodo nesorazmerno prizadeti.
As regards consumers, there was no noticeable price-increase following the imposition of the anti-dumping duties and, also taking into account the results of the post-RIP analysis, there are no indications that consumer prices will increase disproportionately in the future.
Glede potrošnikov po uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov ni bilo opaznega zvišanja cen in glede na rezultate analize po OPP nič ne kaže, da se bodo potrošniške cene v prihodnosti nesorazmerno zvišale.
To conclude, the review investigation did not bring to light any compelling reasons why the anti-dumping measures should not be maintained.
S preiskavo zaradi izteka ukrepov niso bili ugotovljeni nobeni tehtni razlogi za to, da se protidampinški ukrepi ne bi smeli ohraniti.
After disclosure of the definitive findings, one interested party claimed that it were not the anti-dumping measures that helped the Union industry, but the restructuring efforts only.
Po razkritju dokončnih ugotovitev je ena zainteresirana stranka trdila, da industriji Unije niso pomagali protidampinški ukrepi ampak zgolj njena prizadevanja za prestrukturiranje.
This claim was not only without further substantiation, but it also ignores the objective findings of this review investigation.
Ta trditev ne le ni utemeljena, ampak tudi ne upošteva objektivnih ugotovitev te preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
Notably, it ignores the coincidence in time between the imposition of the anti-dumping measures and the stabilisation process of the Union industry.
Poudariti je treba, da ne upošteva sovpadanja uvedbe protidampinških ukrepov in procesa stabilizacije industrije Unije.
Indeed, since the imposition of the measures, the massive increase of low priced, dumped imports stopped and combined imports fell from a market share of 35,5 % to 28,7 %.
Od uvedbe ukrepov se je masovno povečevanje poceni dampinškega uvoza resnično ustavilo, kombiniran uvoz pa se je v smislu tržnega deleža zmanjšal s 35,5 % na 28,7 %.
This decrease of dumped imports on the Union market alleviated the price pressure exerted by those low priced footwear and helped the Union industry to continue with its restructuring efforts.
To zmanjšanje dampinškega uvoza na trg Unije je sprostilo pritisk cen, ki ga je povzročila cenena obutev ter industriji Unije pomagalo pri prestrukturiranju.
It was also reiterated that the Union cannot mass produce and due to the consequent missing economies of scale it would not be able to satisfy the strong demand in the Union of cheaper shoes.
Ponovno je bilo poudarjeno, da Unija ne more masovno proizvajati in da zaradi posledično odsotne ekonomije obsega ne more zadostiti velikemu povpraševanju po cenejši obutvi v Uniji.
Firstly, it is pointed out that this claim was not substantiated.
Prvič, poudarja se, da ta trditev ni bila utemeljena.
Secondly, amongst the Union producers, there are also a number of bigger producers of lower segment shoes with lower sales prices, some of them having been analysed in the sample.
Drugič, med proizvajalci Unije so tudi številni večji proizvajalci obutve nižjega razreda z nižjimi prodajnimi cenami, od katerih so bili nekateri vključeni v vzorec.
Moreover, with regard to the claim that the Union industry would not be in a position to deliver the required volumes, it is noted that the investigation showed that most of the larger importers selected in the sample do not only order from one single supplier, but also source relatively smaller volumes from several suppliers.
Poleg tega je treba v zvezi s trditvijo, da industrija Unije ne more zagotoviti potrebnih količin, poudariti, da je preiskava pokazala, da večina večjih uvoznikov, izbranih v vzorec ne dobavlja samo od enega samega dobavitelja, ampak relativno majhne količine kupuje tudi od več drugih dobaviteljev.
This, together with the effects of the ‘clustering model’ as set out in section E.2., whereby work forces of several smaller companies are combined, should logically also enable the Union industry to produce bigger volumes.
To bi skupaj z učinki „grozdnega modela“, kot je opisan v poglavju E.2., kjer se združuje delovna sila več manjših družb, posledično moralo industriji Unije omogočiti proizvodnjo večjih količin.
Two interested parties claimed that the situation of globally outsourcing Union producers was not analysed in the same detail as was done for the sampled Union producers.
Dve zainteresirani stranki sta trdili, da položaj proizvajalcev Unije, ki delo oddajajo globalno, ni bil preučen tako podrobno kot je bil preučen za vzorčene proizvajalce Unije.
It is however noted that the analysis included an assessment of all interested parties to the extent that they cooperated in the investigation.
Vendar se poudarja, da je analiza vključevala oceno vseh zainteresiranih strank, tako da so slednje sodelovale v preiskavi.
For example, the interest of a large Union producer who was excluded from the definition of the Union industry because of its import volumes, see recitals 402 et seqq, was examined in quite some detail.
Interes večjega proizvajalca Unije, ki je bil izključen iz opredelitve industrije Unije zaradi uvoznih količin, glej uvodno izjavo (402) in naslednje, je bil na primer preučen enako podrobno.
It should also be noted that companies in the Union which have outsourced the majority of their production to third countries are to be technically considered in anti-dumping investigations as importers and the situation of importers has fully been taken into account and analysed in recitals 409 et seqq.
Poudariti je treba tudi, da je treba družbe v Uniji, ki so oddale večino svoje proizvodnje v tretje države, v protidampinških preiskavah tehnično šteti kot uvoznike in da je bil položaj uvoznikov v celoti upoštevan in preučen v uvodni izjavi (409) in naslednjih.
One party pointed out that there was a wrong assessment of the interests of formerly sampled Union producers as some of them were allegedly against the continuation of measures.
Ena stranka je poudarila, da je bila opravljena temeljita ocena interesa prvotno vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, saj so bili nekateri izmed njih domnevno proti nadaljevanju ukrepov.
This is however not correct, as even the company that did not see the benefit for itself claimed that measures helped to curb dumped imports.
To ne drži, saj je celo družba, ki zase ni videla koristi, trdila, da so ukrepi pomagali zmanjšati dampinški uvoz.
One other company only mentioned that it is difficult for them in the economic crisis to foresee the exact effect of anti-dumping duties in the future, but this company did not mention that the duties were without merit.
Neka druga družba je samo omenila, da je zanjo v času gospodarske krize težko predvideti, kakšen točno bo učinek protidampinških dajatev v prihodnosti, ni pa omenila, da dajatve nimajo nobenih zaslug.
Thus, even the parties that did not explicitly mention that they directly benefited from measures have pointed out that measures have brought the indirect benefit of curbing imports from the PRC and Vietnam.
Tako so tudi stranke, ki niso izrecno omenile, da so imele neposredno korist od ukrepov, poudarile, da so ukrepi posredno pripomogli k zmanjšanju uvoza iz Kitajske in Vietnama.
It is therefore definitely confirmed that overall the Union producers benefited from the measures and showed their capacity to improve their situation once measures mitigated the effects of injurious dumping.
Zato se dokončno potrjuje, da so proizvajalci Unije na splošno imeli korist od ukrepov ter pokazali sposobnost za izboljšanje svojega položaja, ko so ukrepi ublažili učinke škodljivega dampinga.
Several interested parties criticised in general that the interests of anonymous complainants would be protected whereas the interests of importers, other economic operators as well as consumers would have been largely disregarded.
Več zainteresiranih strank je izrazilo splošno kritiko, da so bili interesi, izraženi v anonimnih pritožbah, zaščiteni, interesi uvoznikov, drugih subjektov in potrošnikov pa se niso upoštevali.
It is noted that the imposition of the anti-dumping duties was overall found to be beneficial for the Union producers and not found to be disproportionately negative for the other relevant operators.
Opozarja se, da je bila uvedba protidampinških dajatev splošno ocenjena kot koristna za proizvajalce Unije in ne kot nesorazmerno škodljiva za druge relevantne subjekte.
The allegation of discrimination between those parties is however strongly rejected as the same treatment was offered to all parties in the investigation and all interests of cooperating economic operators such as importers, retailers, outsourcing Union producers and consumers were carefully considered and analysed in the investigation.
Trditev glede diskriminacije med navedenimi strankami se strogo zavrača, saj je bila enaka obravnava ponujena vsem strankam v preiskavi, vsi interesi sodelujočih gospodarskih subjektov, kot so uvozniki, trgovci na drobno, proizvajalci Unije, ki dela oddajajo podizvajalcem, in potrošniki, pa so bili natančno preučeni v okviru preiskave.
Several parties claimed that the importers’ profits would not be high enough to shoulder increased import costs, exchange rate developments, cost of switching to other sources of supply and anti-dumping duties.
Več strank je trdilo, da dobiček uvoznikov ne bi zadostoval za prevzem bremena povečanih stroškov uvoza, sprememb v zvezi z deviznim tečajem, stroškov preusmerjanja na druge dobavitelje in protidampinških dajatev.
This claim has however not been sufficiently substantiated.
Vendar ta trditev ni bila zadostno utemeljena.
As shown in table 22, the order of magnitude of the profit of importers, i.e. around 20 %, is such that it appears that they still have room to shoulder the aforementioned costs.
Kot je prikazano v preglednici 22, je dobiček uvoznikov, tj. 20 %, tak, da se zdi, da ti še vedno lahko nosijo breme navedenih stroškov.
It has been claimed that the employment figure given for importers, i.e. around 23000 people, is too low as it would not include ‘value adding jobs’ in the Union.
Trdilo se je, da je številka zaposlitev za uvoznike, tj. približno 23000 ljudi, prenizka, saj ne vključuje „del z dodano vrednostjo“ v Uniji.
This is however not true.
Vendar to ne drži.
The employment figure of importers has been calculated on the basis of the verified employment figures of the sampled importers which also included high value adding jobs, such as design, marketing, R&yD, branding etc., attributable to the product concerned.
Številka zaposlitev za uvoznike je bila izračunana na podlagi preverjenih številk zaposlitev vzorčenih uvoznikov, ki so vključevale tudi dela z visoko dodano vrednostjo, kot so oblikovanje, marketing, raziskave in razvoj, trženje blagovne znamke itn., povezana z zadevnim izdelkom.
All verified employment figures were added and put into relation to the import volume of the product concerned of the sampled importers.
Vse preverjene številke zaposlitev so bile dodane in primerjane s količino uvoza zadevnega izdelka vzorčenih uvoznikov.
Then, this result was extrapolated to the overall import volume from the countries concerned.
Nato se je na podlagi tega rezultata sklepalo za celotno količino uvoza iz zadevnih držav.
Thus, it the employment figure established included also significant ‘value adding jobs’ in the Union.
Tako je končna številka zaposlitev vključevala tudi pomemben delež „del z dodano vrednostjo“ v Uniji.
Some parties have claimed that the argument that importers could easily switch sources of supply is factually incorrect and simplistic.
Nekatere stranke so trdile, da je trditev, da so uvozniki lahko preprosto prešli z enega dobavitelja na drugega, dejansko napačna in preveč poenostavljena.
One interested party claimed that there were no alternative sources of supply.
Ena zainteresirana stranka je trdila, da nima nobenih drugih dobaviteljev.
In this respect, it is noted that it was never stated that switching sources of supply would be easy.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da se nikoli ni trdilo, da je zamenjava dobaviteljev enostavna.
The Commission does not deny that switching suppliers might entail extra costs and requires time and that some importers have long terms relationships with their suppliers.
Komisija ne zanika, da zamenjava dobaviteljev lahko pomeni dodatne stroške in zahteva čas, ter da nekateri uvozniki dolgoročno sodelujejo s svojimi dobavitelji.
Based on the information gathered from the sampled importers and another non-sampled importer, it could however be concluded in recital 452 of the Regulation that a significant degree of flexibility existed and that any additional efforts to switch sources were not such as to prevent those operators from doing so.
Na podlagi informacij, pridobljenih od vzorčenih uvoznikov, in še enega nevzorčenega uvoznika je bilo v uvodni izjavi (452) Uredbe možno skleniti, da je prožnost velika in da morebitna dodatna prizadevanja, potrebna za zamenjavo dobaviteljev, niso tako velika, da bi navedenim subjektom to onemogočala.
Indeed, those importers significantly increased their supply from third countries as shown in table 19.
Kot je prikazano v preglednici 19, so navedeni uvozniki dejansko bistveno povečali svojo dobavo iz tretjih držav.
The same trend was observed for non-sampled importers, given that Eurostat shows an increase of 4 percentage points as regards imports from third countries (table 7).
Enak trend je bilo zaznati pri nevzorčenih uvoznikih, glede na to, da Eurostat poroča o povečanju uvoza iz tretjih držav (preglednica 7) za 4 odstotne točke.
Some interested parties argued that the continuation of measures will intensify job decline in the Union, certainly with regard to importers and retailers.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so trdile, da bo nadaljevanje ukrepov spodbudilo izgubo delovnih mest v Uniji, in sicer zagotovo v zvezi z uvozniki in trgovci na drobno.
This claim was not substantiated by the interested parties.
Te trditve zainteresirane stranke niso utemeljile.
Moreover, the file shows that, as concerns the sampled importers, employment related to the product concerned increased by 6 % from 2005 to the RIP.
Poleg tega je iz dokumentacije o vzorčenih uvoznikih mogoče razbrati, da se je zaposlenost, povezana z zadevnim izdelkom v obdobju od 2005 do OPP povečala za 6 %.
It was claimed that an analysis of potential benefits of discontinuation of measures to importers was missing.
Trdilo se je, da analiza možnih koristi ukinitve ukrepov za uvoznike ni bila izvedena.
In this regard, it is noted that based on the wording of Article 21 of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, it has to be analysed if there are compelling reasons not to impose anti-dumping measures.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da je treba na podlagi besedila člena 21 osnovne protidampinške uredbe preučiti, ali obstajajo tehtni razlogi za neuvedbo ukrepov.
In the framework of an expiry review this means that it has to be analysed if there exist compelling reasons not to maintain the measures, i.e. negative effects of a prolongation of those measures have to be identified and those effects have to be balanced against the benefits of the Union industry in order to assess if those negative effects are disproportionate.
V okviru pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov to pomeni, da je treba preučiti, ali obstajajo tehtni razlogi za neohranitev ukrepov, tj. opredeliti je treba negativne učinke podaljšanja navedenih ukrepov, navedene učinke pa je treba primerjati s koristmi industrije Unije, da se lahko oceni, ali bi bili negativni učinki nesorazmerni.