natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is recalled that even with anti-dumping measures in place, imports from the countries concerned had a market share of 24,6 % in the RIP.
Tudi ob izvajanju protidampinških ukrepov je imel uvoz iz zadevnih držav v OPP tržni delež 24,6 %.
The investigation showed that the cooperating Indian exporting producer has significant spare capacity, corresponding to more than 30 % of Community consumption.
Preiskava je pokazala, da ima sodelujoči indijski proizvajalec izvoznik veliko prostih zmogljivosti, ki ustrezajo več kot 30 % potrošnje Skupnosti.
In addition, information available to the Commission showed that the existing production of sulphanilic acid in the PRC is around 22000 tonnes, which corresponds to more than double the Community consumption.
Nadalje so informacije, ki so na voljo Komisiji, pokazale, da je obstoječa proizvodnja sulfanilne kisline v LRK približno 22000 ton, kar ustreza več kot polovici potrošnje Skupnosti.
On the basis of the same information, it also appears that Chinese producers are able to easily switch production from speciality dyes and chemicals to sulphanilic acid.
Na podlagi enakih informacij lahko sklepamo, da kitajski proizvajalci brez težav preidejo s proizvodnje posebnih barvil in kemikalij na sulfanilno kislino.
These capacities, which may be available in the countries concerned, indicate that the exporting producers have the possibility to increase their current production and thus also to increase their exports of sulphanilic acid to the Community.
Zmogljivosti, ki bi bile morda na voljo v zadevnih državah, nakazujejo, da lahko omenjeni proizvajalci izvozniki povečajo trenutno proizvodnjo in s tem izvoz sulfanilne kisline v Skupnost.
It is also noted that Community consumption slightly decreased over the period considered and it is not expected that the demand in the next few years will be such as to absorb the potential increase in imports from the PRC and India should the measures be terminated.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da se je potrošnja Skupnosti v obravnavanem obdobju nekoliko zmanjšala, ob tem pa se ne pričakuje, da bo potreba v naslednjih letih tako velika, da bo prišlo v primeru, da se ukrepi ne izvajajo več, do absorpcije potencialnega povečanja uvoza iz LRK in Indije.
In this scenario, exports of sulphanilic acid from the PRC and India would very likely replace a large share of the sales made by the Community industry, as the prices of imports are likely to be lower.
V tem primeru bo izvoz sulfanilne kisline iz LRK in Indije verjetno nadomestil velik prodajni delež industrije Skupnosti, saj bodo cene uvoza zelo verjetno nižje kot cene industrije Skupnosti.
The investigation established that the Community market remains attractive for both Chinese and Indian exporting producers.
S preiskavo je bilo ugotovljeno, da trg Skupnosti ostaja privlačen za kitajske in indijske proizvajalce izvoznike.
Indeed, as mentioned in recitals 57 and 62 above, it was found that the average export price of Indian and Chinese sales to other third countries was significantly below the average export price to the Community.
Kot je bilo navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 57 in 62, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je povprečna izvozna cena indijske in kitajske prodaje ostalim tretjim državam veliko nižja od povprečne izvozne cene v Skupnost.
Despite the fact that no price undercutting was found to exist for Chinese and Indian export prices when adjusted by the current anti-dumping and normal customs duties, the Chinese and Indian CIF export prices were found, on average, to be considerably lower (around 18 %) than the average price of the Community industry.
Kljub dejstvu, da nelojalno nižanje cen pri kitajskih in indijskih izvoznih cenah pri uskladitvi s trenutnimi protidampinškimi in normalnimi carinskimi dajatvami ni bilo ugotovljeno, so bile kitajske in indijske CIF cene v povprečju občutno nižje (približno 18 %) kot povprečne cene v Skupnosti.
Therefore, without any measures in place, imports of sulphanilic acid from the countries concerned into the Community are likely to significantly increase in the light of (i) the unused capacities (namely in India), (ii) the re-direction of exports to other third countries into the Community market, (iii) the possibility to switch production from speciality dyes and chemicals to sulphanilic acid (namely in the PRC), at price levels significantly below the current price levels in the Community.
Zato se bo uvoz sulfanilne kisline iz zadevnih držav v Skupnost brez ukrepov najverjetneje zelo povečal v smislu (i) neizkoriščenih zmogljivosti (tj. v Indiji), (ii) preusmeritve izvoza iz ostalih tretjih držav na trg Skupnosti, (iii) možnosti preusmeritve proizvodnje iz posebnih barvil in kemikalij na proizvodnjo sulfanilne kisline (tj. LRK) ob cenah, ki bodo znatno nižje od trenutnih cen v Skupnosti.
On the basis of the foregoing, it can be concluded that, should measures lapse, imports into the Community market from the countries concerned would very likely occur in significant volumes and at dumped prices which would be below the Community industry’s prices.
Na podlagi prej navedenega lahko sklepamo, da bi v primeru izteka veljavnosti ukrepov uvoz na trg Skupnosti iz zadevnih držav potekal v velikih količinah in ob dampinških cenah, ki bi bile nižje od cen industrije Skupnosti.
This would in all likelihood have the effect of introducing a price-depressive trend on the Community market, with an expected negative impact on the economic situation of the Community industry.
Vse to bi najverjetneje povzročilo učinek trenda nižanja cen na trgu Skupnosti, kar bi po pričakovanjih negativno vplivalo na gospodarski položaj industrije Skupnosti.
This would, in particular, reverse the recovery that was achieved over the period considered, leading to a likely recurrence of injury.
To bi še zlasti negativno vplivalo na obnovo, do katere je delno prišlo med obravnavanim obdobjem, ter vodilo do ponovnega pojava škode.
According to Article 21 of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether maintenance of the existing anti-dumping measures would be against the interest of the Community as a whole.
V skladu s členom 21 osnovne uredbe je bilo proučeno, ali bi bila ohranitev obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov v nasprotju z interesom Skupnosti kot celote.
The determination of the Community interest was based on an appreciation of all various interests involved.
Pri določitvi interesa Skupnosti so bili upoštevani vsi različni s tem povezani interesi.
On this basis, it was examined whether, despite the conclusions on the likelihood of recurrence of injurious dumping, compelling reasons existed which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case.
Na podlagi tega je bilo proučeno, ali so kljub sklepom o verjetnosti ponovitve škodljivega dampinga obstajali utemeljeni razlogi za sklep, da ohranitev ukrepov v tem konkretnem primeru ni v interesu Skupnosti.
It can reasonably be expected that the Community industry will continue to benefit from the measures currently imposed and further recover by regaining market share and improving its profitability.
Smiselno je pričakovati, da bo industrija Skupnosti imela še naprej koristi od trenutno veljavnih ukrepov in bo njen tržni delež še naprej rasel ter da bo izboljšala svojo dobičkonosnost.
Should the measures not be maintained, it is likely that the Community industry will again begin to suffer injury as a result of increased imports at dumped prices from the countries concerned and that its currently fragile financial situation will deteriorate.
V primeru, da se ukrepi ne ohranijo, obstaja verjetnost, da bo industrija Skupnosti ponovno utrpela škodo zaradi povečanega uvoza po dampinških cenah iz zadevnih držav in da se bo trenutno ranljivo finančno stanje še poslabšalo.
On this basis, it can be concluded that maintaining the measures would be in the interest of the Community industry.
Na splošno je mogoče skleniti, da bi bilo nadaljevanje ukrepov jasno v interesu industrije Skupnosti.
It is recalled that in the original investigation, it was found that the imposition of measures would not have a serious impact on Community traders of sulphanilic acid.
Treba je poudariti, da je bilo med prvotno preiskavo ugotovljeno, da izvajanje ukrepov ne bi imelo večjega vpliva na trgovce Skupnosti s sulfanilno kislino.
As indicated above, no importer cooperated in this investigation; therefore, no compelling reasons were presented to suggest that the imposition of measures would be against the interest of importers.
Kot je bilo navedeno zgoraj, noben uvoznik ni sodeloval v preiskavi, zato ni utemeljenih razlogov, ki bi nakazovali, da bi bilo izvajanje ukrepov v nasprotju z interesom uvoznikov.
The Commission sent questionnaires to all 31 known users, of which only four submitted a questionnaire reply.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike vsem 31 znanim uporabnikom, od katerih so samo štirje vrnili izpolnjen vprašalnik.
Three questionnaire replies were received from Community companies producing optical brighteners and one questionnaire reply from a company producing dyes.
Tri vrnjene vprašalnike so poslale družbe Skupnosti, ki proizvajajo optična belila in en vprašalnik družba, ki proizvaja barvila.
However, the information provided by these users regarding the effect of the measures and the proportion that sulphanilic acid represented in their manufacturing costs was not meaningful.
Kljub temu pa informacije, ki so jih posredovali omenjeni uporabniki glede učinka ukrepov in deleža, ki ga je sulfanilna kislina predstavljala pri njihovih proizvodnih stroških, niso bile pomembne.
The volumes of the product concerned imported by these four users represented 47,3 % of the total imports in the Community.
Obseg zadevnega izdelka, ki so ga uvažali omenjeni štirje uporabniki, je predstavljal 47,3 % celotnega uvoza v Skupnosti.
Moreover, as these four users purchase significant volumes of sulphanilic acid from the Community industry, they accounted overall for around 40 % of Community consumption in the RIP.
Ker so omenjeni štirje uporabniki sulfanilno kislino kupovali od industrije Skupnosti v velikih količinah, so predstavljali približno 40 % celotne potrošnje Skupnosti v OPP.
Three users have made the same comments opposing the maintenance of the measures on the grounds that the production capacity of the Community industry is insufficient to meet domestic demand and on the grounds that the measures harm their competitiveness on the downstream products.
Trije uporabniki so navedli enake razloge za nasprotovanje nadaljevanju izvajanja ukrepov, saj naj bi bile proizvodne zmogljivosti industrije Skupnosti nezadostne za potrebe domačega povpraševanja, ukrepi pa škodijo konkurenčnosti nadaljnjih izdelkov.
The fourth user remained silent on whether it was in favour or against the maintenance of the measures.
Četrti uporabnik ni podal mnenja in se ni izrazil, ali je za ali proti ohranjanju ukrepov.
Regarding the supply situation on the Community market, it is to be noted that the current production capacity of the Community industry could satisfy in the region of 80 % of Community consumption.
V zvezi s stanjem dobave na trgu Skupnosti je treba opozoriti, da bi lahko sedanja proizvodna zmogljivost industrije Skupnosti zadovoljila približno 80 % povpraševanja Skupnosti.
It should also be stressed that the Community industry has invested in new facilities in order to increase its output of pure grade sulphanilic acid.
Treba je tudi poudariti, da je industrija Skupnosti investirala v nove objekte da bi povečala donos čiste sulfanilne kisline.
In any event, the purpose of the measures is not to prevent imports from the countries concerned entering the Community market but to ensure that they are made at non-dumped and non-injurious prices.
Kakor koli, namen ukrepov ni zapreti trg Skupnosti za uvoz iz zadevnih držav, temveč zagotoviti, da poteka uvoz po nedampinških in neškodljivih cenah.
It is therefore expected that imports from the countries concerned will continue to enter the market, as has been the case following the imposition of measures in 2002.
Zato se pričakuje, da se bo uvoz iz zadevnih držav še naprej pojavljal tem na trgu kot do sedaj po uveljavitvi ukrepov leta 2002.
It should also be noted that sulphanilic acid production outside the Community is now restricted to a few countries in the world, such as India, the PRC and the US.
Treba je tudi upoštevati, da je proizvodnja sulfanilne kisline zunaj Skupnosti zdaj omejena na nekaj držav, kot so Indija, LRK in ZDA.
It is therefore important that the Community industry is allowed to operate under effective competition conditions so that domestic supplies of the product continue to be available to all users in the Community.
Zato je pomembno, da se industriji Skupnosti omogoči, da deluje v okviru učinkovitih konkurenčnih pogojev, da so lahko domače zaloge izdelka še vedno dostopne vsem uporabnikom v Skupnosti.
Regarding the competitiveness of the users, it should be noted that, despite the lack of information obtained from the users in the framework of this investigation, it was shown in the original investigation that anti-dumping measures would increase the full costs of optical brighteners and of dyes containing sulphanilic acid by less than 1 %.
Glede konkurenčnosti uporabnikov je treba upoštevati, da je bilo kljub pomanjkanju informacij, ki so jih podali uporabniki v okviru te preiskave, v prvotni preiskavi dokazano, da se bodo zaradi protidampinških ukrepov skupni stroški optičnih belil in barvil, ki vsebujejo sulfanilno kislino, zvišali za manj kot 1 %.
On the basis of the above, it is also considered, in the framework of this expiry review investigation, that the maintenance of measures would not have a major adverse impact on the situation of users.
Na podlagi zgoraj opisanega se v okviru pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov šteje, da ohranitev ukrepov nima večjega neželenega učinka na položaj uporabnikov.
They were also granted a period during which to make representations and to comment.
Odobreno jim je bilo tudi obdobje, v katerem so lahko podale svoje pritožbe in stališča.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to the likelihood of continuation of dumping regarding imports of sulphanilic acid from the PRC, the likelihood of recurrence of dumping in regard to imports from India, the likelihood of recurrence of injury and Community interest, the anti-dumping measures on imports of sulphanilic acid should be maintained in order to prevent a recurrence of injury being caused to the Community industry by the dumped imports.
Glede na sklepe v zvezi z možnim nadaljevanjem dampinga glede uvoza sulfanilne kisline iz LRK, verjetnostjo ponovitve dampinga pri uvozu iz Indije, verjetnostjo ponovitve škode in interesom Skupnosti je treba protidampinške ukrepe na uvoz sulfanilne kisline ohraniti, da se prepreči, da bi dampinški uvoz ponovno povzročal škodo industriji Skupnosti.
The duty rate will not be applicable for imports of the product concerned which are manufactured and sold for export to the Community by one Indian company from which an undertaking has been accepted by Commission Decision 2006/37/EC,
Stopnja dajatve se ne bo uporabljala za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga za izvoz v Skupnost proizvaja in prodaja ena indijska družba, od katere je bila sprejeta zaveza s Sklepom Komisije 2006/37/ES –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of sulphanilic acid falling within CN codes ex29214210 (TARIC code 2921421060) originating in the People’s Republic of China and India.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz sulfanilne kisline, ki spada pod oznako KN ex29214210 (oznaka TARIC 2921421060) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Indije.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net free-at-Community frontier price, before duty, for the products described in paragraph 1, shall be as follows:
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja pred obračunom dajatev za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti za izdelke iz odstavka 1, je naslednja:
Notwithstanding paragraph 1, the definitive anti-dumping duty shall not apply to imports released for free circulation in accordance with Article 2.
Ne glede na odstavek 1 se dokončna protidampinška dajatev ne uporablja pri uvozu, ki se sprosti v prosti promet v skladu s členom 2.
Imports declared for release into free circulation which are invoiced by companies from which undertakings are accepted by the Commission and whose names are listed in Decision 2006/37/EC, as from time to time amended, shall be exempt from the anti-dumping duty imposed by Article 1, on condition that:
Uvoženo blago, deklarirano za sprostitev v prosti promet in fakturirano v družbah, katerih zaveze je Komisija sprejela in katerih imena so navedena v občasno spremenjenem Sklepu 2006/37/ES, se oprosti protidampinških dajatev, uvedenih na podlagi člena 1, pod pogojem, da:
they are manufactured, shipped and invoiced directly by the said companies to the first independent customer in the Community, and
ga izdelajo, odpravijo in fakturirajo omenjene družbe neposredno prvi neodvisni stranki v Skupnosti in
such imports are accompanied by an undertaking invoice which is a commercial invoice containing at least the elements and the declaration stipulated in the Annex of this Regulation, and
je takemu uvozu priložen račun na podlagi zaveze, tj. trgovinska faktura, ki vsebuje vsaj podatke in izjavo, predvidene v Prilogi k tej uredbe, in
A customs debt shall be incurred at the time of acceptance of the declaration for release into free circulation whenever it is established, in respect of goods described in Article 1 and exempted from the duties under the conditions listed in paragraph 1, that one or more of such conditions is not fulfilled.
Carinski dolg nastane ob sprejetju deklaracije za sprostitev v prosti promet, če se izkaže, da blago, opisano v členu 1 in izvzeto iz dajatev v skladu s pogoji, navedenimi v odstavku 1, ne izpolnjuje enega ali več navedenih pogojev.
The condition set out in the second indent of paragraph 1 shall be considered as not being fulfilled where the undertaking invoice is found not to comply with the provisions of the Annex or found not to be authentic or where the Commission has withdrawn the acceptance of the undertaking pursuant to Article 8(9) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 or Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation in a Regulation or Decision which refers to (a) particular transaction(s) and declares the relevant undertaking invoice(s) as invalid.
Pogoj iz druge alinee odstavka 1 ni izpolnjen, kadar račun na podlagi zaveze ni v skladu z določbami iz Priloge ali ni pristen ali kadar Komisija umakne sprejetje zaveze v skladu s členom 8(9) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 ali členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe s sklepom ali uredbo, ki zadeva konkretne transakcije ter razglasi ustrezne račune na podlagi zaveze za neveljavne.
Importers shall accept as a normal trade risk the fact that the non-fulfilment, by any party, of one or more of the conditions listed in paragraph 1 and further defined in paragraph 2, may give rise to a customs debt incurred under Article 201 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code [15].
Uvozniki kot običajno poslovno tveganje sprejmejo dejstvo, da lahko neizpolnjevanje enega ali več pogojev s strani katere koli stranke, navedene v odstavku 1 in podrobneje opredeljene v odstavku 2, povzroči nastanek carinskega dolga v skladu s členom 201 Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 z dne 12. oktobra 1992 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [15].
OJ C 101, 27.4.2005, p. 34.
UL C 101, 27.4.2005, str 34.
OJ L 22, 26.1.2006, p. 52.
UL L 22, 26.1.2006, str. 52.
OJ L 22, 26.1.2006, p. 5.
UL L 22, 26.1.2006, str. 5.
OJ C 272, 9.11.2006, p. 18.
UL C 272, 9.11.2006, str. 18.
OJ C 171, 24.7.2007, p. 18.
UL C 171, 24.7.2007, str. 18.
OJ C 171, 24.7.2007, p. 14.
UL C 171, 24.7.2007, str. 14.
OJ C 229, 29.9.2007, p. 9.
UL C 229, 29.9.2007, str. 9.
The following elements shall be indicated in the commercial invoice accompanying the company’s sales of sulphanilic acid to the Community which are subject to an undertaking:
Trgovinska faktura za prodajo sulfanilne kisline v Skupnost, za katero velja zaveza, vsebuje naslednje podatke:
The heading ‘COMMERCIAL INVOICE ACCOMPANYING GOODS SUBJECT TO AN UNDERTAKING’.
naslov „TRGOVINSKA FAKTURA, KI SPREMLJA BLAGO, KI JE PREDMET ZAVEZE“;
The name of the company, mentioned in Article 1 of Commission Decision 2006/37/EC accepting the undertaking, issuing the commercial invoice.
ime družbe, ki izdaja trgovinsko fakturo in je omenjena v členu 1 Sklepa Komisije 2006/37/ES, ki sprejema zavezo in izdaja trgovinsko fakturo;
the product code number (PCN) used for the purpose of the undertaking (e.g. PA99, PS85 or TA98),
številčno oznako izdelka (PCN), ki se uporablja za namene zaveze (npr. „PA99“, „PS85“ ali „TA98“),
the technical/physical specifications of the PCN, i.e. for ‘PA99’ and ‘PS85’ white free-flowing powder, and for ‘TA98’ grey free-flowing powder,
tehničnimi/fizikalnimi specifikacijami številčne kode izdelka, to je za „PA99“ in „PS85“ beli zelo sipek prah, za „TA98“ pa sivi zelo sipek prah,
the company product code number (CPC) (if applicable),
številčno kodo izdelka družbe (CPC) (če se uporablja),
The name of the official of the company that has issued the commercial invoice and the following signed declaration:
ime uradnika družbe, ki izda trgovinsko fakturo, in naslednjo podpisano izjavo:
‘I, the undersigned, certify that the sale for direct export to the European Community of the goods covered by this invoice is being made within the scope and under the terms of the Undertaking offered by [COMPANY], and accepted by the European Commission through Decision 2006/37/EC.
„Podpisani potrjujem, da se prodaja blaga za neposredni izvoz v Evropsko skupnost, zajetega s to fakturo, opravlja v obsegu in po pogojih zaveze, ki jo je ponudila [DRUŽBA] in sprejela Evropska komisija s Sklepom 2006/37/ES.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1001/2008
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1001/2008
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain tube and pipe fittings, of iron or steel, originating in the Republic of Korea and Malaysia following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterega železnega ali jeklenega pribora (fitingov) za cevi s poreklom iz Republike Koreje in Malezije po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96
In August 2002, definitive anti-dumping measures on imports of certain tube and pipe fittings (‘TPFs’ or the ‘product concerned’) originating, inter alia, in the Republic of Korea and Malaysia (the ‘countries concerned’) were imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1514/2002 [2] (the ‘original investigation’).
Avgusta 2002 so bili z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1514/2002 [2] („prvotna preiskava“) uvedeni dokončni protidampinški ukrepi na uvoz nekaterega pribora (fitingov) za cevi („zadevni izdelek“) s poreklom med drugim iz Republike Koreje in Malezije („zadevni državi“).
The anti-dumping duties in force for Malaysia are: 59,2 % for Anggerik Laksana Sdn Bhd and 75 % for all other companies; for the Republic of Korea the duty is 44 % for all companies.
Veljavne protidampinške dajatve za Malezijo so 59,2 % za Anggerik Laksana Sdn Bhd in 75 % za vse druge družbe, za Republiko Korejo pa dajatev za vse družbe znaša 44 %.
Outside the scope of this proceeding, anti-dumping measures are currently in force imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 964/2003 [3] on exports from the People’s Republic of China (58,6 %) and Thailand (58,9 %), with the exception of two companies in Thailand, and those consigned from Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Taiwan or not.
Ta postopek ne zajema trenutno veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov, uvedenih z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 964/2003 [3] na izvoz iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (58,6 %) in Tajske (58,9 %), z izjemo dveh družb, ter izvoz, poslan s Tajske, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran s poreklom s Tajske ali ne.