natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Each Member State shall establish, maintain and publish, in accordance with the technical specifications set out in the Annex, a ‘trusted list’ containing the minimum information related to the certification service providers issuing qualified certificates to the public who are supervised/accredited by them.
Vsaka država članica v skladu s tehničnimi specifikacijami iz Priloge vzpostavi, vzdržuje in objavi „zanesljiv seznam“, ki vsebuje minimalne informacije v zvezi z overitelji, ki izdajajo kvalificirana potrdila javnosti ter so nadzorovani in akreditirani s strani države.
Member States shall establish and publish, as a minimum, a human readable form of the trusted list in accordance with the specifications set out in the Annex.
Države članice v skladu s specifikacijami, določenimi v Prilogi, vzpostavijo in objavijo vsaj zanesljiv seznam v čitljivi obliki.
Member States shall notify to the Commission the body responsible for the establishment, maintenance and publication of the trusted list, the location where the trusted list is published and any changes thereto.
Države članice Komisiji sporočijo, kateri organ je odgovoren za vzpostavitev, vzdrževanje in objavo zanesljivega seznama, kje je zanesljivi seznam objavljen in vse njegove spremembe.
Application
Začetek veljavnosti
This Decision shall apply from 28 December 2009.
Ta odločba začne veljati 28. decembra 2009.
Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2009/767/EC of 16 October 2009 setting out measures facilitating the use of procedures by electronic means through the ‘points of single contact’ under Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market
Popravek Odločbe Komisije 2009/767/ES z dne 16. oktobra 2009 o vzpostavitvi ukrepov za pospeševanje uporabe postopkov po elektronski poti s pomočjo „enotnih kontaktnih točk“ po Direktivi 2006/123/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o storitvah na notranjem trgu
(Official Journal of the European Union L 274 of 20 October 2009)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 274 z dne 20. oktobra 2009)
Decision 2009/767/EC should read as follows:
Odločba 2009/767/ES se glasi:
The Community framework for e-signatures was established in Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures [2].
Okvir Skupnosti za elektronski podpis je bil vzpostavljen z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 1999/93/ES z dne 13. decembra 1999 o okviru Skupnosti za elektronski podpis [2].
Each Member State shall establish, maintain and publish, in accordance with the technical specifications set out in the annex, a ‘trusted list’ containing the minimum information related to the certification service providers issuing qualified certificates to the public who are supervised/accredited by them.
Vsaka država članica v skladu s tehničnimi specifikacijami iz Priloge vzpostavi, vzdržuje in objavi „zanesljiv seznam“, ki vsebuje minimalne informacije v zvezi z overitelji, ki izdajajo kvalificirana potrdila javnosti ter so nadzorovani in akreditirani s strani države.
Member States shall establish and publish, as a minimum, a human readable form of the trusted list in accordance with the specifications set out in the annex.
Države članice v skladu s specifikacijami, določenimi v Prilogi, vzpostavijo in objavijo vsaj zanesljiv seznam v čitljivi obliki.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR A COMMON TEMPLATE FOR THE ‘TRUSTED LIST OF SUPERVISED/ACCREDITED CERTIFICATION SERVICE PROVIDERS’
TEHNIČNE SPECIFIKACIJE ZA SKUPNI MODEL ZA „ZANESLJIVI SEZNAM NADZOROVANIH/AKREDITIRANIH OVERITELJEV“
The purpose of the Common Template for Member States' ‘Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers’ is to establish a common way in which information is provided by each Member State about the supervision/accreditation status of the certification services from Certification Service Providers [1] (CSPs) who are supervised/accredited by them for compliance with the relevant provisions of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Namen skupnega modela za „Zanesljivi seznam nadzorovanih/akreditiranih overiteljev“ držav članic je vzpostaviti skupen način, na katerega države članice zagotovijo informacije o statusu nadzora/akreditacije storitev overjanja s strani overiteljev [1] (CSP), ki so nadzorovani/akreditirani zaradi skladnosti z zadevnimi določbami Direktive 1999/93/ES.
This includes the provision of historical information about the supervision/accreditation status of the supervised/accredited certification services.
To vključuje zagotavljanje preteklih informacij o statusu nadzora/akreditacije nadzorovanih/akreditiranih storitev overjanja.
The mandatory information in the Trusted List (TL) must include a minimum of information on supervised/accredited CSPs issuing Qualified Certificates (QCs) [2] in accordance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC (Art. 3,3, 3,2, and Art 7.1(a)), including information on the QC supporting an electronic signature and whether or not the signature is created by a Secure Signature Creation Device (SSCD) [3].
Obvezne informacije na zanesljivem seznamu (TL) morajo zajemati najmanj informacije o nadzorovanih/akreditiranih overiteljih, ki izdajajo kvalificirana potrdila (QC) [2] v skladu z določbami iz Direktive 1999/93/ES (členi 3.3, 3.2 in 7.1(a)), vključno z informacijami o kvalificiranih potrdilih, ki podpirajo elektronski podpis, in o tem, ali je podpis oblikovan z napravo za varno tvorjenje podpisa (SSCD) [3].
Additional information on other supervised/accredited CSPs not issuing QCs but providing services related to electronic signatures (e.g. CSP providing Time Stamping Services and issuing Time Stamp Tokens, CSP issuing non-Qualified certificates, etc.) may be included in the Trusted List at a national level on a voluntary basis.
Prostovoljno je na nacionalni ravni v zanesljivi seznam mogoče vključiti dodatne informacije o drugih nadzorovanih/akreditiranih overiteljih, ki ne izdajajo kvalificiranih potrdil, vendar nudijo storitve, povezane z elektronskimi podpisi (npr. o overiteljih, ki nudijo storitve časovnega žigosanja in izdajajo žetone časovnega žiga, o overiteljih, ki izdajajo nekvalificirana potrdila itd.).
This information is aimed primarily at supporting the validation of Qualified Electronic Signatures (QES) and Advanced Electronic Signatures (AdES) [4] supported by a Qualified Certificate [5] [6].
Te informacije so namenjene predvsem podpori potrjevanja kvalificiranih elektronskih podpisov (QES) in naprednih elektronskih podpisov (AdES) [4], ki temeljijo na kvalificiranem potrdilu [5] [6].
The proposed Common Template is compatible with an implementation based on the specifications from ETSI TS 102 231 [7] that are used to address the establishment, publication, location, access, authentication and trusting of such kinds of lists.
Predlagani skupni model je skladen z izvajanjem, ki temelji na specifikacijah ETSI TS 102 231 [7], ki se uporabljajo za obravnavanje vzpostavitve, objave, lokacije, dostopa, avtentifikacije in zaupanja v takšne sezname.
Guidelines for editing entries in the TL
Smernice za urejanje vnosov v zanesljivi seznam
A TL focusing on supervised/accredited certification services
Zanesljivi seznam nadzorovanih/akreditiranih storitev overjanja
Relevant Certification Services and Certification Service Providers in a single List
Zadevne storitve overjanja in overitelji na enem seznamu
The Trusted List of a Member State is defined as the ‘Supervision/Accreditation Status List of certification services from Certification Service Providers who are supervised/accredited by the referenced Member State for compliance with the relevant provisions of Directive 1999/93/EC’.
Zanesljivi seznam države članice je opredeljen kot „seznam statusov nadzora/akreditacije storitev overjanja s strani overiteljev, ki jih referenčna država članica nadzoruje/akreditira za skladnost z zadevnimi določbami Direktive 1999/93/ES“.
Such a Trusted List must cover:
Takšen zanesljivi seznam mora zajemati:
all Certification Service Providers, as defined in Article 2.11 of Directive 1999/93/EC, i.e. ‘entity or a legal or natural person who issues certificates or provides other services related to electronic signatures’;
vse overitelje, kot so opredeljeni v členu 2.11 Direktive 1999/93/ES, tj. „subjekt, fizična ali pravna oseba, ki izdaja potrdila ali opravlja druge storitve v zvezi z elektronskim podpisom“,
that are supervised/accredited for compliance with the relevant provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC.
ki so nadzorovani/akreditirani za skladnost z zadevnimi določbami iz Direktive 1999/93/ES.
When considering the definitions and provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC, in particular with regard to the relevant CSPs and their supervision/voluntary accreditation systems, two sets of CSPs can be distinguished, namely the CSPs issuing QCs to the public (CSPQC), and the CSPs not issuing QCs to the public but providing ‘other (ancillary) services related to electronic signatures’:
Pri obravnavi opredelitev in določb iz Direktive 1999/93/ES, zlasti v zvezi z zadevnimi overitelji in njihovimi prostovoljnimi sistemi nadzora/akreditacije, je mogoče razlikovati med dvema skupinama overiteljev, in sicer overitelji, ki izdajajo kvalificirana potrdila javnosti (CSPQC), in overitelji, ki ne izdajajo kvalificiranih potrdil javnosti, temveč zagotavljajo „druge (pomožne) storitve, povezane z elektronskimi podpisi“:
CSPs issuing QCs:
Overitelji, ki izdajajo kvalificirana potrdila:
They must be supervised by the Member State in which they are established (if they are established in a Member State) and may also be accredited for compliance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC, including with the requirements of Annex I (requirements for QCs), and those of Annex II (requirements for CSPs issuing QCs).
Nadzorovati jih mora tista država članica, v kateri imajo sedež (če imajo sedež v državi članici EU), in so lahko akreditirani tudi za skladnost z določbami iz Direktive 1999/93/ES, vključno z zahtevami Priloge I (zahteve za kvalificirana potrdila) in zahtevami Priloge II (zahteve za overitelje, ki izdajajo kvalificirana potrdila).
CSPs issuing QCs that are accredited in a Member State must still fall under the appropriate supervision system of that Member State unless they are not established in that Member State.
Overitelji, ki izdajajo kvalificirana potrdila in so akreditirani v državi članici, morajo še vedno spadati v ustrezen sistem nadzora te države članice, razen če nimajo sedeža v tej državi članici.
The applicable ‘supervision’ system (respectively ‘voluntary accreditation’ system) is defined and must meet the relevant requirements of Directive 1999/93/EC, in particular those laid down in Art. 3,3, Art. 8,1, Art. 11, recital (13) (respectively, Art.2.13, Art. 3,2, Art 7.1(a), Art. 8,1, Art. 11, recitals (4)-(11-13)).
Veljavni sistem „nadzora“ (oziroma prostovoljni sistem „akreditacije“) je opredeljen in mora izpolnjevati ustrezne zahteve Direktive 1999/93/ES, zlasti zahteve v členih 3.3, 8.1 in 11 ter uvodni izjavi 13 (oziroma členih 2.13, 3.2, 7.1(a), 8.1 in 11 ter uvodnih izjavah 4 in 11 do 13).
CSPs not issuing QCs:
Overitelji, ki ne izdajajo kvalificiranih potrdil:
They may fall under a ‘voluntary accreditation’ system (as defined in and in compliance with Directive 1999/93/EC) and/or under a nationally defined ‘recognised approval scheme’ implemented on a national basis for the supervision of compliance with the provisions laid down in the Directive and possibly with national provisions with regard to the provision of certification services (in the sense of Art. 2,11 of the Directive).
Lahko spadajo v prostovoljni sistem „akreditacije“ (kot je opredeljen v Direktivi 1999/93/ES in skladno s to direktivo) in/ali v nacionalno opredeljeno „priznano shemo potrjevanja“, ki se izvaja na nacionalni ravni za nadzor skladnosti z določbami iz Direktive in po možnosti z nacionalnimi določbami v zvezi z zagotavljanjem storitev overjanja (v smislu člena 2.11 Direktive).
Some of the physical or binary (logical) objects generated or issued as a result of the provision of a certification service may be entitled to a specific ‘qualification’ on the basis of their compliance with the provisions and requirements laid down at national level, but the meaning of such a ‘qualification’ is likely to be limited solely to the national level.
Nekateri fizični ali binarni (logični) objekti, ustvarjeni ali izdani kot posledica zagotavljanja storitev overjanja, so lahko upravičeni do posebne „kvalifikacije“ na podlagi njihove skladnosti z določbami in zahtevami na nacionalni ravni, vendar je pomen takšne „kvalifikacije“ verjetno omejen izključno na nacionalno raven.
The Trusted List of a Member State must provide a minimum of information on supervised/accredited CSPs issuing Qualified Certificates to the public in accordance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC (Art. 3,3, 3,2 and Art. 7.1(a)), information on the QC supporting the electronic signature and whether the signature is or not created by a Secure Signature Creation Device.
Zanesljivi seznam države članice mora nuditi najmanj informacije o nadzorovanih/akreditiranih overiteljih, ki izdajajo kvalificirana potrdila (QC) javnosti v skladu z določbami iz Direktive 1999/93/ES (členi 3.3, 3.2 in 7.1(a)), informacije o kvalificiranih potrdilih, ki podpirajo elektronski podpis, in o tem, ali je podpis oblikovan z napravo za varno tvorjenje podpisa (SSCD).
Additional information on other supervised/accredited services from CSPs not issuing QCs to the public (e.g. CSPs providing Time Stamping Services and issuing Time Stamp Tokens, CSPs issuing non-Qualified certificates, etc.) may be included in the Trusted List at national level on a voluntary basis.
Prostovoljno je na nacionalni ravni v zanesljivi seznam mogoče vključiti dodatne informacije o drugih nadzorovanih/akreditiranih storitvah overiteljev, ki ne izdajajo kvalificiranih potrdil javnosti (npr. o overiteljih, ki nudijo storitve časovnega žigosanja in izdajajo žetone časovnega žiga, o overiteljih, ki izdajajo nekvalificirana potrdila itd.).
The Trusted List aims at:
Namen zanesljivega seznama je:
listing and providing reliable information on the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers, who are supervised/accredited by the Member State responsible for establishing and maintaining the List for compliance with the relevant provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC;
popisati in nuditi zanesljive informacije o statusu nadzora/akreditacije storitev overjanja s strani overiteljev, ki jih nadzira/akreditira država članica, ki je odgovorna za pripravo in posodabljanje seznama zaradi skladnosti z zadevnimi določbami iz Direktive 1999/93/ES,
facilitating the validation of electronic signatures supported by the listed supervised/accredited certification services from the listed CSPs.
olajšati potrjevanje elektronskih podpisov, ki temeljijo na navedenih nadzorovanih/akreditiranih storitvah overjanja navedenih overiteljev.
A single set of Supervision/Accreditation status values
Enotna zbirka vrednosti statusa nadzora/akreditacije
One single TL must be established and maintained per Member State to indicate the supervision and/or accreditation status of those certification services from those CSPs that are supervised/accredited by the Member State.
Vsaka država članica mora vzpostaviti in vzdrževati enoten zanesljivi seznam, ki navaja status nadzora in/ali akreditacije tistih storitev overjanja s strani overiteljev, ki jih država članica nadzoruje/akreditira.
The fact that a service is currently either supervised or accredited is part of its current status.
Dejstvo, da je storitev trenutno nadzorovana ali akreditirana, je del trenutnega statusa.
In addition to that, a supervision or accreditation status can be ‘ongoing’, ‘in cessation’, ‘ceased’, or even ‘revoked’.
Poleg tega je lahko status nadzora ali akreditacije „v teku“, „se ukinja“, „ukinjen“ ali celo „preklican“.
Throughout its lifetime, the same certification service may move from a supervision status to an accreditation status and vice versa [8].
V času obstoja storitve overjanja se lahko njen status spremeni iz statusa nadzora v status akreditacije in obratno [8].
The following Figure 1 describes the expected flow, for one single certification service, between possible supervision/accreditation statuses:
Naslednja slika 1 opisuje pričakovani tok za eno storitev overjanja med možnima statusoma nadzora/akreditacije:
Expected supervision/accreditation status flow for a single CSP service
Pričakovani tok statusa nadzora/akreditacije za storitev overitelja
A certification service issuing QCs must be supervised (if it is established in a Member State) and may be voluntarily accredited.
Overitelj, ki izdaja kvalificirana potrdila, mora biti nadzorovan (če ima sedež v državi članici) in je lahko prostovoljno akreditiran.
The status value of such a service when listed in a Trusted List can have any of the above depicted status values as ‘current status value’.
„Trenutna vrednost statusa“ takšne storitve, ki je navedena v zanesljivem seznamu, je lahko katera koli od zgoraj prikazanih vrednosti.
However, it should be noted that ‘Accreditation ceased’ and ‘Accreditation revoked’ must both be ‘transit status’ values only in the case of CSPQC services established in a Member State, as such services must be supervised by default (even when not or no longer accredited).
Vendar pa je treba poudariti, da morata imeti statusa „akreditacija ukinjena“ in „akreditacija preklicana“ vrednosti „tranzitnega statusa“ samo v primeru CSPQC s sedežem v državi članici, saj morajo biti te storitve nadzorovane že same po sebi (tudi če niso oziroma niso več akreditirane).
It is required that Member States establishing or having established a nationally defined ‘recognised approval scheme(s)’ implemented on a national basis for the supervision of compliance of services from CSPs not issuing QCs with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC and with possible national provisions with regard to the provision of certification services (in the sense of Art. 2,11 of the Directive) will categorise such approval scheme(s) under the following two categories:
Zahteva se, da države članice, ki vzpostavljajo ali so vzpostavile nacionalno opredeljeno „priznano shemo potrjevanja“, uvedeno na nacionalni ravni za nadzor skladnosti storitev overiteljev, ki ne izdajajo kvalificiranih potrdil, z določbami iz Direktive 1999/93/ES in z morebitnimi nacionalnimi določbami v zvezi z zagotavljanjem storitev overjanja (v smislu člena 2.11 Direktive), razvrstijo takšne sheme potrjevanja v naslednji kategoriji:
‘voluntary accreditation’ as defined and regulated in Directive 1999/93/EC (Art.2.13, Art. 3,2, Art 7.1(a), Art. 8,1, Art. 11, recitals (4)-(11-13));
„prostovoljna akreditacija“, kot je opredeljena in urejena v Direktivi 1999/93/ES (členi 2.13, 3.2, 7.1(a), 8.1, 11 ter uvodne izjave 4 in 11 do 13),
‘supervision’ as required in Directive 1999/93/EC and implemented by national provisions and requirements in accordance with national laws.
„nadzor“, kot ga zahteva Direktiva 1999/93/ES ter se izvaja z nacionalnimi določbami in zahtevami v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo.
Accordingly, a certification service not issuing QCs may be supervised or voluntarily accredited.
Overitelj, ki ne izdaja kvalificiranih potrdil, je lahko nadzorovan ali prostovoljno akreditiran.
The status value of such a service when listed in a Trusted List can have any of the above depicted status values as its ‘current status value’ (see Figure 1).
„Trenutna vrednost statusa“ takšne storitve, ki je navedena v zanesljivem seznamu, je lahko katera koli od zgoraj prikazanih vrednosti (glej sliko 1).
The Trusted List must contain information about the underlying supervision/accreditation scheme(s), in particular:
Zanesljivi seznam mora vsebovati informacije o osnovni shemi nadzora/akreditacije, zlasti:
Information on the supervision system applicable to any CSPQC;
informacije o sistemu nadzora, ki velja za katerega koli CSPQC,
Information, when applicable, on the national ‘voluntary accreditation’ scheme applicable to any CSPQC;
informacije, kadar je to primerno, o nacionalni „prostovoljni shemi akreditacije“, ki velja za kateri koli CSPQC,
Information, when applicable, on the supervision system applicable to any CSP not issuing QCs;
informacije, kadar je to primerno, o sistemu nadzora, ki velja za katerega koli overitelja, ki ne izdaja kvalificiranih potrdil,
Information, when applicable, on the national ‘voluntary accreditation’ scheme applicable to any CSP not issuing QCs.
informacije, kadar je to primerno, o nacionalni „prostovoljni shemi akreditacije“, ki velja za katerega koli overitelja, ki ne izdaja kvalificiranih potrdil.
The last two sets of information are of critical importance for relying parties to assess the quality and security level of such supervision/accreditation systems applied at national level to CSPs not issuing QCs.
Zadnja dva niza informacij sta izjemno pomembna za to, da stranke ocenijo raven kakovosti in varnosti takšnih sistemov nadzora/akreditacije, ki na nacionalni ravni veljajo za overitelje, ki ne izdajajo kvalificiranih potrdil.
When supervision/accreditation status information is provided in the TL with regard to services from CSPs not issuing QCs, the aforementioned sets of information shall be provided at TL level through the use of ‘Scheme information URI’ (clause 5.3.7 – information being provided by Member States), ‘Scheme type/community/rules’ (clause 5.3.9 – through the use of a text common to all Member States, and optional specific information provided by a Member State) and ‘TSL policy/legal notice’ (clause 5.3.11 – a text common to all Member States referring to Directive 1999/93/EC, together with the ability for each Member State to add Member State specific text/references).
Če je v zanesljivem seznamu podana informacija o statusu nadzora/akreditacije v zvezi s storitvami overiteljev, ki ne izdajajo kvalificiranih potrdil, se zgoraj navedeni nizi informacij vključijo v zanesljivi seznam s pomočjo „Scheme information URI“ (klavzula 5.3.7 – informacije, ki jih zagotovijo države članice), „Scheme type/community/rules“ (klavzula 5.3.9 – s pomočjo besedila, ki je enako za vse države članice, in neobveznih posebnih informacij, ki jih zagotovi država članica) in „TSL policy/legal notice“ (klavzula 5.3.11 – besedilo, ki je enako za vse države članice s sklicevanjem na Direktivo 1999/93/ES, skupaj z možnostjo za vsako državo članico, da doda besedilo/reference, specifične za državo članico).
Additional ‘qualification’ information defined at the level of national supervision/accreditation systems for CSPs not issuing QCs may be provided at the service level when applicable and required (e.g. to distinguish between several quality/security levels) through the use of ‘additionalServiceInformation’ extension (clause 5.8.2) as part of ‘Service information extension’ (clause 5.5.9).
Dodatne informacije o „kvalifikaciji“, opredeljene na ravni nacionalnih sistemov nadzora/akreditacije za overitelje, ki ne izdajajo kvalificiranih potrdil, se lahko zagotovijo na ravni storitve, če je to primerno in potrebno (npr. za razlikovanje med več ravnmi kakovosti/varnosti), s pomočjo razširitve „additionalServiceInformation“ (klavzula 5.8.2) kot dela „Service information extension“ (klavzula 5.5.9).
Further information on the corresponding technical specifications is provided in the detailed specifications in Chapter I.
Dodatne informacije o ustreznih tehničnih specifikacijah so navedene v podrobnih specifikacijah v poglavju I.