natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the cases referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2(c), (g), (i) and (j), before deciding not to recognise and to execute a decision, either totally or in part, the competent authority in the executing State shall consult the competent authority in the issuing State, by any appropriate means, and shall, where appropriate, ask it to supply any necessary information without delay.’;
Preden pristojni organ v državi izvršiteljici v primerih iz odstavkov 1 ter 2(c), (g), (i) in (j) odloči, da bo bodisi v celoti bodisi delno zavrnil priznanje in izvršbo odločbe, se na kakršen koli primeren način posvetuje s pristojnim organom v državi izdajateljici in ga, kadar je to ustrezno, zaprosi, da mu brez odlašanja posreduje informacije, ki jih potrebuje.“
in point (h) of the Annex (CERTIFICATE), point 3 is replaced by the following:
V točki (h) Priloge (POTRDILO) se točka 3 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Indicate if the person concerned appeared in person at the trial resulting in the decision:
Navedite, ali je bila oseba osebno navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odločbo:
the person, having been expressly informed about the proceedings and the possibility to appear in person in a trial, expressly waived his or her right to an oral hearing and has expressly indicated that he or she does not contest the case.
oseba je, potem ko je bila izrecno obveščena o postopkih in možnosti, da je lahko osebno navzoča na sojenju, izrecno izjavila, da se odpoveduje pravici do ustne obravnave, in je izrecno navedla, da ne bo izpodbijala odločbe.
If you have ticked the box under points 3.1b, 3.2, 3.3 or 3.4 above, please provide information about how the relevant condition has been met:
Če ste označili polje pod točko 3.1b, 3.2 ali 3.3 zgoraj, prosimo, da navedete informacije o tem, kako je bil izpolnjen zadevni pogoj
Amendments to Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA
Spremembe Okvirnega sklepa 2006/783/PNZ
Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA is hereby amended as follows:
Okvirni sklep 2006/783/PNZ se spremeni:
in Article 8(2), point (e) shall be replaced by the following:
V členu 8(2)se točka (e) nadomesti z naslednjim:
according to the certificate provided for in Article 4(2), the person did not appear in person at the trial resulting in the confiscation order, unless the certificate states that the person, in accordance with further procedural requirements defined in the national law of the issuing State:
glede na potrdilo iz člena 4(2) oseba ni bila osebno navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odredbo o zaplembi, razen če je v potrdilu navedeno, da je bila oseba v skladu z dodatnimi procesnimi zahtevami, določenimi v nacionalnem pravu države izdajateljice:
either was summoned in person and thereby informed of the scheduled date and place of the trial which resulted in the confiscation order, or by other means actually received official information of the scheduled date and place of that trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he or she was aware of the scheduled trial,
osebno povabljena in tako obveščena o predvidenem datumu in kraju sojenja, ki se je zaključilo z odredbo o zaplembi, ali če je bila zadevna oseba dejansko kako drugače uradno obveščena o predvidenem datumu in kraju sojenja, in sicer tako, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila ta oseba seznanjena z načrtovanim sojenjem,
was informed that such a confiscation order may be handed down if he or she does not appear for the trial;
obveščena, da se odredba o zaplembi lahko izreče, če se sojenja ne udeleži,
after being served with the confiscation order and being expressly informed of the right to a retrial, or an appeal, in which the person has the right to participate and which allows the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, to be re-examined, and which may lead to the original decision being reversed:
potem ko ji je bila vročena odredba o zaplembi in je bila izrecno obveščena o pravici do ponovnega sojenja ali pritožbe, v kateri ima pravico sodelovati, ki omogoča, da se vsebina zadeve skupaj z novimi dokazi ponovno preučijo, in ki lahko privede do spremembe prvotne odločbe:
expressly stated that he or she does not contest the confiscation order,
je oseba izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odredbe o zaplembi,
did not request a retrial or appeal within the applicable time frame.’;
ni zahtevala ponovnega sojenja ali vložila pritožbe v ustreznem roku.“
in the Annex (CERTIFICATE), point (j) shall be replaced by the following:
V Prilogi (POTRDILO) se točka (j) nadomesti z naslednjim:
Indicate if the person appeared in person at the trial resulting in the confiscation order:
Navedite, ali je bila oseba osebno navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odredbo o zaplembi:
Yes, the person appeared in person at the trial resulting in the confiscation order.
Da, oseba je bila osebno navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odredbo o zaplembi.
No, the person did not appear in person at the trial resulting in the confiscation order.
Ne, oseba ni bila osebno navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odredbo o zaplembi.
the person was summoned in person on … (day/month/year) and thereby informed of the scheduled date and place of the trial which resulted in the confiscation order and was informed that a decision may be handed down if he or she does not appear for the trial;
oseba je bila osebno povabljena dne … (dan/mesec/leto) in tako obveščena o predvidenem datumu in kraju sojenja, ki se je zaključilo z odredbo o zaplembi, in je bila obveščena, da se odločba lahko izreče, če se sojenja ne udeleži;
the person was not summoned in person but by other means actually received official information of the scheduled date and place of the trial which resulted in the confiscation order, in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he or she was aware of the scheduled trial, and was informed that a decision may be handed down if he or she does not appear for the trial;
oseba ni bila osebno povabljena, temveč je bila kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o predvidenem datumu in kraju sojenja, ki se je zaključilo z odredbo o zaplembi, in sicer tako, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila zadevna oseba seznanjena z načrtovanim sojenjem, obveščena je bila tudi, da se odločba lahko izreče, če se sojenja ne udeleži;
the person was served with the confiscation order on … (day/month/year) and was expressly informed about the right to a retrial or appeal, in which he or she has the right to participate and which allows the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, to be re-examined, and which may lead to the original decision being reversed, and
osebi je bila odredba o zaplembi vročena dne … (dan/mesec/leto) in je bila izrecno obveščena o pravici do ponovnega sojenja ali pritožbe, v kateri ima pravico sodelovati, ki omogoča, da se vsebina zadeve skupaj z novimi dokazi ponovno preučijo, in ki lahko privede do spremembe prvotne odločbe, in
the person expressly stated that he or she does not contest the decision,
oseba je izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe;
the person did not request a retrial or appeal within the applicable time frame.
oseba v ustreznem roku ni zahtevala ponovnega sojenja ali ni vložila pritožbe.
Amendments to Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA
Spremembe Okvirnega sklepa 2008/909/PNZ
Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA is hereby amended as follows:
Okvirni sklep 2008/909/PNZ se spremeni:
in Article 9(1), point (i) shall be replaced by the following:
V členu 9(1) se točka (i) nadomesti z naslednjim:
being aware of the scheduled trial had given a mandate to a legal counsellor, who was either appointed by the person concerned or by the State, to defend him or her at the trial, and was indeed defended by that counsellor at the trial;
je bila seznanjena z načrtovanim sojenjem in je pooblastila pravnega zastopnika, ki ga je imenovala sama ali ga je imenovala država, da jo zastopa na sojenju, in jo je ta zastopnik na sojenju dejansko zastopal,
after being served with the decision and being expressly informed of the right to a retrial, or an appeal, in which the person has the right to participate and which allows the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, to be re-examined, and which may lead to the original decision being reversed:
potem ko ji je bila vročena odločba in je bila izrecno obveščena o pravici do ponovnega sojenja ali pritožbe, v kateri ima pravico sodelovati, ki omogoča, da se vsebina zadeve skupaj z novimi dokazi ponovno preučijo, in ki lahko privede do spremembe prvotne odločbe:
in point (i) of Annex I (CERTIFICATE), point 1 shall be replaced by the following:
V točki (k) Priloge (POTRDILO) se točka 1 nadomesti z naslednjim:
being aware of the scheduled trial the person had given a mandate to a legal counsellor, who was either appointed by the person concerned or by the State, to defend him or her at the trial, and was indeed defended by that counsellor at the trial;
oseba je bila seznanjena z načrtovanim sojenjem in je pooblastila pravnega zastopnika, ki ga je imenovala sama ali ga je imenovala država, da jo zastopa na sojenju, in jo je ta zastopnik na sojenju dejansko zastopal;
Amendments to Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA
Spremembe Okvirnega sklepa 2008/947/PNZ
Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA is hereby amended as follows:
Okvirni sklep 2008/947/PNZ se spremeni:
in Article 11(1), point (h) shall be replaced by the following:
Točka (h) člena 11(1) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
according to the certificate provided for in Article 6, the person did not appear in person at the trial resulting in the decision, unless the certificate states that the person, in accordance with further procedural requirements defined in the national law of the issuing State:
če glede na potrdilo iz člena 6 oseba ni bila osebno navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odločbo, razen če je v potrdilu navedeno, da je bila oseba v skladu z dodatnimi procesnimi zahtevami, določenimi v nacionalnem pravu države izdajateljice:
in Annex I (CERTIFICATE), point (h) shall be replaced by the following:
V Prilogi (POTRDILO) se točka (h) nadomesti z naslednjim:
Implementation and transitional provisions
Izvajanje in prehodne določbe
Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with the provisions of this Framework Decision by 28 March 2011.
Države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, potrebne za uskladitev z določbami tega okvirnega sklepa do 28. marca 2011.
This Framework Decision shall apply as from the date mentioned in paragraph 1 to the recognition and enforcement of decisions rendered in the absence of the person concerned at the trial.
Ta okvirni sklep se od dne iz odstavka 1 uporablja za priznavanje in izvrševanje odločb, izrečenih v odsotnosti zadevne osebe.
If a Member State has declared, on the adoption of this Framework Decision, to have serious reasons to assume that it will not be able to comply with the provisions of this Framework Decision by the date referred to in paragraph 1, this Framework Decision shall apply as from 1 January 2014 at the latest to the recognition and enforcement of decisions, rendered in the absence of the person concerned at the trial which are issued by the competent authorities of that Member State.
Če je država članica ob sprejetju tega okvirnega sklepa izjavila, da ima resne razloge za dvom, da do datuma iz odstavka 1 ne bo mogla upoštevati določb tega okvirnega sklepa, se ta okvirni sklep za priznavanje in izvrševanje odločb, izrečenih v odsotnosti zadevne osebe in izdanih s strani pristojnih organov te države članice, začne uporabljati najpozneje 1. januarja 2014.
Any other Member State may require that the Member State having made such a declaration shall apply the relevant provisions of the Framework Decisions referred to in Articles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 in the versions in which they were adopted originally to the recognition and enforcement of decisions, rendered in the absence of the person concerned at the trial, which were issued by such other Member State.
Katera koli druga država članica lahko zahteva, da država članica, ki je podala takšno izjavo, uporablja za priznavanje in izvrševanje odločb, izrečenih v odsotnosti zadevne osebe in izdanih s strani te države članice, ustrezne določbe okvirnih sklepov iz členov 2, 3, 4, 5 in 6 v prvotno sprejetih različicah.
Until the dates mentioned in paragraphs 1 and 3, the relevant provisions of the Framework Decisions referred to in Articles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 shall continue to apply in the versions in which they were adopted originally.
Do datumov iz odstavkov 1 in 3 se še naprej uporabljajo ustrezne določbe okvirnih sklepov iz členov 2, 3, 4, 5 in 6, in sicer v prvotno sprejetih različicah.
A declaration made in accordance with paragraph 3 shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Izjava, podana v skladu z odstavkom 3, se objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
It may be withdrawn at any time.
Izjava se lahko kadar koli umakne.
Member States shall transmit to the General Secretariat of the Council and to the Commission the text of the provisions transposing into their national law the obligations imposed on them under this Framework Decision.
Države članice pošljejo generalnemu sekretariatu Sveta in Komisiji besedila določb predpisov, ki v nacionalno zakonodajo prenašajo obveznosti iz tega okvirnega sklepa.
By 28 March 2014, the Commission shall draw up a report on the basis of the information received from the Member States pursuant to Article 8(6).
Komisija do 28. marca 2014 na podlagi informacij, ki jih je v skladu s členom 8(6) prejela od držav članic, pripravi poročilo.
On the basis of the report referred to in paragraph 1, the Council shall assess:
Svet na podlagi poročila iz odstavka 1 oceni:
the extent to which Member States have taken the necessary measures in order to comply with this Framework Decision; and
v kakšnem obsegu so države članice sprejele ukrepe, potrebne za upoštevanje določb tega okvirnega sklepa, in
The report referred to in paragraph 1 shall be accompanied, where necessary, by legislative proposals.
Poročilo iz odstavka 1 po potrebi spremljajo zakonodajni predlogi.
This Framework Decision shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta okvirni sklep začne veljati na dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
OJ C 52, 26.2.2008, p. 1.
UL C 52, 26.2.2008, str. 1.
Framework Decision of 24 February 2005 (OJ L 76, 22.3.2005, p. 16).
Okvirni sklep z dne 24. februarja 2005 (UL L 76, 22.3.2005, str. 16).
Framework Decision of 6 October 2006 (OJ L 328, 24.11.2006, p. 59).
Okvirni sklep z dne 6. oktobra 2006 (UL L 328, 24.11.2006, str. 59).
Framework Decision of 27 November 2008 (OJ L 327, 5.12.2008, p. 27).
Okvirni sklep z dne 27. novembra 2008 (UL L 327, 5.12.2008, str. 27).
Framework Decision of 27 November 2008 (OJ L 337, 16.12.2008, p. 102).
Okvirni sklep z dne 27. novembra 2008 (UL L 337, 16.12.2008, str. 102).
Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 (OJ L 190, 18.7.2002, p. 1).
Okvirni sklep z dne 13. junija 2002 (UL L 190, 18.7.2002, str. 1).
Council Framework Decision 2009/315/JHA
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2009/315/PNZ
on the organisation and content of the exchange of information extracted from the criminal record between Member States
o organizaciji in vsebini izmenjave informacij iz kazenske evidence med državami članicami
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission and the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium,
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije in pobude Kraljevine Belgije,
The European Union has set itself the objective of providing citizens with a high level of safety within the area of freedom, security and justice.
Evropska unija si je za cilj postavila, da evropskim državljanom zagotovi visoko raven varstva v območju svobode, varnosti in pravice.
This objective presupposes the exchange between the competent authorities of the Member States of information extracted from criminal records.
Ta cilj predpostavlja, da si pristojni organi držav članic izmenjujejo informacije iz kazenske evidence.
On 29 November 2000 the Council, in accordance with the conclusions of the Tampere European Council of 15 and 16 October 1999, adopted a programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters [2].
V skladu s sklepi Evropskega sveta z zasedanja v Tampereju 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 je Svet 29. novembra 2000 sprejel Program ukrepov za izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb na področju kazenskih zadev [2].
This Framework Decision contributes to achieving the goals provided for by measure 3 of the programme, which calls for the establishment of a standard form like that drawn up for the Schengen bodies, translated into all the official languages of the Union, for criminal records requests.
Ta okvirni sklep prispeva k doseganju ciljev, predvidenih z ukrepom št. 3 Programa, ki poziva k uvedbi enotnega obrazca, prevedenega v vse uradne jezike Unije, ki bi bil podoben enotnemu obrazcu, oblikovanemu za schengenske organe.
The Final Report on the first evaluation exercise on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters [3] called on the Member States to simplify the procedures for transferring documents between States, using, if necessary, standard forms to facilitate mutual legal assistance.
V Končnem poročilu o prvi oceni medsebojne pravne pomoči v kazenskih zadevah [3] so bile države članice pozvane, naj poenostavijo postopke posredovanja dokumentov med državami, če je potrebno z uporabo enotnih obrazcev za olajšanje medsebojne pravne pomoči.
The need to improve the quality of information exchanged on convictions was prioritised in the European Council Declaration on Combating Terrorism of 25 and 26 March 2004 and was reiterated in the Hague Programme [4], adopted by the European Council on 4 and 5 November 2004, which called for greater exchange of information from national conviction and disqualification registers.
Potreba po izboljšanju kakovosti izmenjanih informacij o obsodbah je bila določena kot prednostna naloga v Deklaraciji Evropskega sveta o boju proti terorizmu z dne 25. in 26. marca 2004 ter potrjena v Haaškem programu [4], ki ga je sprejel Evropski svet 4. in 5. novembra 2004 in ki poziva k izboljšanju izmenjave informacij iz nacionalnih registrov obsodb in prepovedi.
These objectives are reflected in the Action Plan jointly adopted by the Council and the Commission on 2 and 3 June 2005 with a view to carrying out the Hague Programme.
Ti cilji se odražajo v Akcijskem načrtu za izvedbo Haaškega programa, ki sta ga 2. in 3. junija 2005 sprejela skupaj Svet in Komisija.
With a view to improving the exchange of information between Member States on criminal records, projects developed with the aim to achieve this objective are welcomed, including the existing project for the interconnection of national criminal registers.
Za boljšo izmenjavo informacij iz kazenskih evidenc med državami članicami so dobrodošli projekti, ki so bili zasnovani za dosego tega cilja, vključno z obstoječim projektom za medsebojno povezavo nacionalnih kazenskih evidenc.
The experience gathered from these activities has encouraged the Member States to further enhance their efforts and showed the importance to continue streamlining the mutual exchange of information on convictions between the Member States.
Izkušnje iz teh dejavnosti so spodbudile države članice, da še bolj okrepijo svoja prizadevanja, in so pokazale, da se je pomembno še naprej osredotočati na medsebojno izmenjavo informacij o obsodbah med državami članicami.
This Framework Decision is a response to the wishes expressed by the Council on 14 April 2005, following the publication of the White Paper on exchanges of information on convictions and the effect of such convictions in the European Union and the subsequent general discussion thereof.
Ta okvirni sklep je odgovor na pričakovanja, ki jih je izrazil Svet dne 14. aprila 2005, po objavi Bele knjiga o izmenjavi podatkov o kazenskih obsodbah in učinku le-teh v Evropski uniji ter splošni razpravi, ki je temu sledila.
Its main aim is to improve the exchange of information on convictions and, where imposed and entered in the criminal records of the convicting Member State, on disqualifications arising from criminal conviction of citizens of the Union.
Glavni cilj tega okvirnega sklepa je izboljšati izmenjavo informacij o obsodbah in o prepovedih zaradi obsodbe državljanov Evropske unije, če so bile take prepovedi naložene in vpisane v kazensko evidenco države članice izreka obsodbe.
The application of the mechanisms established by this Framework Decision only to the transmission of information extracted from criminal records concerning natural persons should be without prejudice to a possible future broadening of the scope of application of such mechanisms to the exchange of information concerning legal persons.
Uporaba mehanizmov, vzpostavljenih s tem okvirnim sklepom zgolj za pošiljanje informacij glede fizičnih oseb iz kazenske evidence, ne bi smela posegati v morebitno kasnejšo širitev področja uporabe teh mehanizmov na informacije o pravnih osebah.
As between the Member States, this Framework Decision should replace Article 22 of the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters.
Med državami članicami bi moral ta okvirni sklep nadomestiti člen 22 Evropske konvencije o medsebojni pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah.
In addition to the obligations of a convicting Member State to transmit information to the Member States of the person’s nationality concerning convictions handed down against their nationals which this Framework Decision incorporates and further defines, an obligation on the Member States of the person’s nationality to store information so transmitted is also introduced, in order to ensure that they are able to reply fully to requests for information from other Member States.
Poleg obveznosti države članice izreka obsodbe, da državi članici državljanstva sporoča informacije o obsodbah, izrečenih zoper njene državljane, ki jo ta okvirni sklep vključuje in nadalje opredeljuje, se uvaja tudi obveznost hrambe tako sporočenih informacij za države članice državljanstva, da bi lahko te države članice podale celovite odgovore na zahtevke za informacije iz drugih držav članic.
This Framework Decision should be without prejudice to the possibility of judicial authorities’ directly requesting and transmitting information from criminal records pursuant to Article 13 in conjunction with Article 15(3), of the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters and without prejudice to Article 6(1) of the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union, established by Council Act of 29 May 2000 [5].
Ta okvirni sklep ne bi smel vplivati na možnost pravosodnih organov, da v skladu s členom 13 v povezavi s členom 15(3) Evropske konvencije o medsebojni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah in brez poseganja v člen 6(1) Konvencije o medsebojni pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah med državami članicami Evropske unije, ustanovljene z Aktom Sveta z dne 29. maja 2000 [5], neposredno zaprosijo in si pošiljajo informacije iz kazenskih evidenc.
Improving the circulation of information on convictions is of little benefit if Member States are not able to take transmitted information into account.
Izboljšano kroženje informacij o obsodbah ni koristno, če države članice ne morejo upoštevati posredovanih informacij.
On 24 July 2008, Council adopted Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA on taking account of convictions in the Member States of the European Union in the course of new criminal proceedings [6].
Svet je 24. julija 2008 sprejel Okvirni sklep 2008/675/PNZ o upoštevanju obsodb med državami članicami Evropske unije v novem kazenskem postopku [6].