natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Domestic sales of a particular product type were considered as sufficiently representative when the volume of that product type sold on the domestic market to independent customers during the IP represented 5 % or more of the total volume of the comparable product type sold for export to the Community.
Domača prodaja posameznih vrst izdelka se je štela za dovolj reprezentativno, če je obseg posamezne vrste izdelka, prodanega neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu v OP, predstavljal 5 % ali več celotnega obsega primerljive vrste izdelka, prodanega za izvoz v Skupnost.
The Commission subsequently examined whether the domestic sales of the companies concerned could be considered as being made in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je nato preučila, ali se lahko domača prodaja zadevnih družb šteje za prodajo v okviru običajnega poteka trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
This was done by establishing for each product type the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market during the investigation period.
To je bilo narejeno z določitvijo deleža dobičkonosne prodaje vsake vrste izdelka neodvisnim strankam na notranjem trgu v obdobju preiskave.
Where the sales volume of a product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of that type, and where the weighted average price of that type was equal to or above the cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price.
Če je obseg prodaje vrste izdelka, prodanega po neto prodajni ceni, enaki ali višji od stroškov proizvodnje, predstavljal več kot 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje navedene vrste in če je tehtana povprečna cena navedene vrste bila enaka ali višja od stroškov proizvodnje, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni.
This price was calculated as a weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales of that type made during the IP, irrespective of whether these sales were profitable or not.
Ta cena je bila izračunana kot tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje navedene vrste v OP, ne glede na to, ali je bila prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne.
Where the volume of profitable sales of a product type represented 80 % or less of the total sales volume of that type, or where the weighted average price of that type was below the cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price, calculated as a weighted average of profitable sales of that type only.
Kadar je obseg dobičkonosne prodaje neke vrste izdelka predstavljal 80 % ali manj celotnega obsega prodaje navedene vrste ali kadar je bila tehtana povprečna cena navedene vrste nižja od stroškov proizvodnje, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtano povprečje dobičkonosne prodaje samo navedene vrste.
In accordance with Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation, the percentage for SG&A and profit margin were based on the weighted average SG&A and profit margin of sales in the ordinary course of trade of the like product of the respective exporting producer.
V skladu s členom 2(6) osnovne uredbe sta odstotek za PSA-stroške in stopnja dobička temeljila na povprečnih PSA-stroških in stopnji dobička od prodaje v običajnem poteku trgovine podobnega izdelka.
The sampled cooperating exporting producer without overall representative domestic sales volume
Vzorčeni sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik, ki ni imel v celoti reprezentativnega obsega domače prodaje
For the cooperating exporting producer without representative domestic sales, normal value was constructed in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation by adding to the company's own manufacturing costs for the product concerned the SG&A expenses and a reasonable profit margin.
Za sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika, ki ni imel reprezentativne domače prodaje, je bila normalna vrednost v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe konstruirana tako, da so bili proizvodnim stroškom družbe za zadevni izdelek prišteti PSA-stroški in razumna stopnja dobička.
In accordance with Article 2(6)(a) of the basic Regulation, the percentage for SG&A and profit margin were based on the weighted average SG&A and profit margin determined for other exporting producers subject to the investigation in respect of their production and sales of the like product on the domestic market.
V skladu s členom 2(6) osnovne uredbe sta odstotek za PSA-stroške in stopnja dobička temeljila na tehtanih povprečnih PSA-stroških in stopnji dobička, ugotovljeni za druge proizvajalce izvoznike, ki so bili preiskani v zvezi s proizvodnjo in prodajo podobnega izdelka na notranjem trgu.
As regards this company, an adjustment was made to take into account its start-up situation, as provided for in Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe je bila za to družbo izvedena prilagoditev zaradi upoštevanja dejstva, da je delovanje družbe v začetni fazi.
An adjustment regarding its overhead costs was made in order to take into account the low capacity utilisation of the production installations during the start-up phase.
Bila je izvedena prilagoditev za njene splošne stroške, da se je upošteval slab izkoristek zmogljivosti proizvodnih obratov v začetni fazi delovanja družbe.
Export sales prices were established on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable for the product concerned in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe so bile izvozne prodajne cene določene na podlagi cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo za zadevni izdelek.
Where export sales to the Community were made through related trading companies located inside or outside the Community, export prices were established on the basis of the resale prices to the first independent customers in the Community, pursuant to Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, duly adjusted for all costs incurred between importation and resale, and profits.
Kadar so se izdelki v Skupnost izvažali prek povezanih trgovinskih družb s sedežem znotraj ali zunaj Skupnosti, so bile izvozne cene določene na podlagi cen pri nadaljnji prodaji prvim neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti, v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe, in prilagojene glede na vse stroške, nastale med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, ter dobičke.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences affecting prices and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Da bi zagotovili pošteno primerjavo med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno, se v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe v obliki prilagoditev ustrezno upoštevajo razlike, ki vplivajo na cene in primerljivost cen.
On this basis, allowances for transport, ocean freight and insurance costs, handling loading and ancillary costs, credit costs and commissions have been made where applicable and justified.
Na podlagi tega so bili izvedeni popravki vrednosti za prevozne stroške, stroške čezmorskega prevoza in zavarovalne stroške, manipulativne stroške, stroške natovarjanja in tozadevne stroške, stroške za kredite in provizije, če je bilo to ustrezno in upravičeno.
For the sampled cooperating exporting producers
Za vzorčene sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike
For the sampled companies, the weighted average normal value of each type of the product concerned exported to the Community was compared with the weighted average export price of the corresponding type of the product concerned, as provided for in Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation.
Za vzorčene družbe se je tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost vsake vrste zadevnega izdelka, izvoženega v Skupnost, primerjala s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno ustrezne vrste zadevnega izdelka, kakor je določeno v členih 2(11) in 2(12) osnovne uredbe.
For the other cooperating exporting producers
Za druge sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike
The weighted average dumping margin of the cooperating exporting producers not included in the sample was calculated in accordance with the provisions of Article 9(6) of the basic Regulation.
Tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki niso bili vključeni v vzorec, je bila izračunana v skladu z določbami člena 9(6) osnovne uredbe.
This margin was calculated on the basis of the margins established for the sampled exporting producers.
Ta stopnja je bila izračunana na podlagi stopenj, ugotovljenih za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike.
On this basis, the dumping margin calculated for the cooperating companies not included in the sample was provisionally set at 33,7 % of the CIF Community frontier price, duty unpaid.
Na tej podlagi je bila stopnja dampinga, izračunana za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso bile vključene v vzorec, začasno določena na 33,7 % cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve.
For the non-cooperating exporting producers
Za nesodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike
With regard to all other exporters in the USA, the Commission first established the level of cooperation.
Za vse ostale izvoznike iz ZDA je Komisija najprej opredelila raven sodelovanja.
A comparison was made between the total export quantities indicated in the sampling replies received from all cooperating exporting producers and the total imports from the USA as derived from US export statistics.
Narejena je bila primerjava med celotnimi izvoznimi količinami, navedenimi v prejetih izpolnjenih vprašalnikih za vzorčenje vseh sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, in celotnim uvozom iz ZDA, kot ga prikazujejo statistični podatki ZDA o izvozu.
The percentage of cooperation found was 81 %.
Ugotovljen odstotek sodelovanja je bil 81 %.
It was therefore considered appropriate to set the dumping margin for the non-cooperating exporting producers at a level corresponding to the one found for the cooperating exporting producer in the sample with the highest individual dumping and injury margin in order to ensure the effectiveness of the measures.
Zato se je zdelo primerno stopnjo dampinga za nesodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike določiti na ravni najvišje ugotovljene stopnje dampinga in škode za vzorčene sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike, da se zagotovi učinkovitost ukrepov.
On this basis, the country-wide level of dumping was provisionally established at 57,3 % of the CIF Community frontier price, duty unpaid.
Na podlagi tega je bila stopnja dampinga na ravni države začasno določena v višini 57,3 % cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve.
Community production and standing
Proizvodnja in položaj Skupnosti
All available information, including information provided in the complaint and data collected from Community producers before and after the initiation of the investigation was used in order to establish total Community production and the support for the investigation.
Za določitev celotne proizvodnje Skupnosti in podporo preiskavi so bile uporabljene vse razpoložljive informacije, vključno z informacijami iz pritožbe in podatki, ki so jih zagotovili proizvajalci Skupnosti pred začetkom preiskave in po njem.
Based on this information it was found that overall Community production was around 5400 thousand tonnes during the IP.
Na podlagi teh informacij je bilo ugotovljeno, da je skupna proizvodnja Skupnosti v OP znašala približno 5400000 ton.
Three companies belonging to the same group were found to be related to exporting producers in the USA and the group was also itself importing significant quantities of the product concerned from its related exporters in the USA.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so bile tri družbe, ki spadajo v isto skupino, povezane s proizvajalci izvozniki iz ZDA, pri čemer je tudi sama skupina uvažala velike količine zadevnega izdelka od svojih povezanih izvoznikov v ZDA.
Therefore, these companies were excluded from the notion of Community production within the meaning of Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation.
Te družbe so zato bile izključene iz proizvodnje Skupnosti v smislu člena 4(1) in člena 5(4) osnovne uredbe.
As a consequence, the production volume on the basis of which standing was established was in the range of 4200 to 4600 thousand tonnes.
Obseg proizvodnje, na podlagi katerega je bil določen položaj Skupnosti, je zato bil med 4200000 do 4600000 ton.
It was established that the companies that supported the complaint and co-operated in the investigation represented more than 60 % of the Community production of biodiesel during the IP indicated in recital (60).
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so družbe, ki so podprle pritožbo in sodelovale v preiskavi, predstavljale več kot 60 % proizvodnje biodizla v Skupnosti v OP, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (60).
The company referred to in recital (63) below which failed to co-operate with the investigation was not considered as a supporter of the complaint.
Za družbo iz uvodne izjave (63), ki ni sodelovala v preiskavi, se je štelo, da pritožbe ni podprla.
It is concluded that the complaint and the investigation are supported by a major proportion of Community production within the meaning of Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da pritožbo in preiskavo podpira večji delež proizvodnje Skupnosti v smislu člena 4(1) in člena 5(4) osnovne uredbe.
Because of the large number of Community producers, it was decided to resort to sampling to establish the existence of material injury.
Zaradi velikega števila proizvajalcev Skupnosti je bilo sklenjeno, da se za ugotovitev obstoja znatne škode uporabi vzorčenje.
Sampling forms were sent to all potential producers of the like product in the Community.
Obrazci za vzorčenje so bili poslani vsem potencialnim proizvajalcem podobnega izdelka v Skupnosti.
Initially more than 40 companies provided meaningful information to the sampling forms and agreed to cooperate with the proceeding.
Jasno izpolnjene obrazce za vzorčenje je prvotno predložilo več kot 40 družb, ki so se strinjale s sodelovanjem v postopku.
The three companies mentioned in recital (60) were not considered for the sampling exercise for the reasons mentioned in that recital.
Tri družbe iz uvodne izjave (60) niso bile vključene v vzorčenje zaradi razlogov iz navedene uvodne izjave.
From the remaining companies a sample of 11 companies was selected on the basis of the largest representative volume of production and sales within the Community, as indicated in recital (11) above.
Med preostalimi družbami je bil izbran vzorec 11 družb na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega proizvodnje in prodaje v Skupnosti, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (11).
One producer originally considered for the sample had to be excluded as it failed to cooperate with the investigation.
Eden od proizvajalcev, prvotno izbranih v vzorec, je bil izključen, ker ni sodeloval v preiskavi.
The remaining ten sampled companies are considered to be representative for the entire Community production.
Preostalih deset vzorčenih družb se šteje za reprezentativne za celotno proizvodnjo Skupnosti.
Reference hereafter to ‘Community industry’ or ‘sampled Community producers’ refers to these ten sampled producers.
Sklicevanje na „industrijo Skupnosti“ ali „vzorčene proizvajalce Skupnosti“ se v nadaljnjem besedilu nanaša na teh deset vzorčenih proizvajalcev.
As mentioned in recital (15) above, the examination of the trends concerning the assessment of injury covered the period from January 2004 to the end of the IP.
Kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (15), je preučitev trendov v zvezi z oceno škode zajela obdobje od januarja 2004 do konca OP.
However the investigation showed that the Community industry was practically starting up in 2004.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da se je industrija Skupnosti dejansko začela razvijati leta 2004.
It was, thus, considered more appropriate to make an analysis based on trends for the period 2005 to the IP (‘period analysed’).
Zato se je zdelo primernejše, da se opravi analiza na podlagi trendov za obdobje od leta 2005 do OP („analizirano obdobje“).
The information collected regarding 2004 is nevertheless also presented in the assessment that follows.
Kljub temu so v oceni v nadaljevanju predstavljene tudi informacije za leto 2004.
Index 2005 = 100
Indeks (2005 = 100)
Community consumption was established on the basis of volume of the overall Community production on the Community market of all Community producers, as ascertained in recital (60) above, minus their exports plus imports from the country concerned by this investigation and imports from other third countries.
Potrošnja Skupnosti je bila določena na podlagi obsega celotne proizvodnje Skupnosti vseh proizvajalcev na trgu Skupnosti, kakor določa uvodna izjava (60), pri čemer se odšteje njihov izvoz in prišteje uvoz iz države, ki jo zadeva ta preiskava, ter uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav.
As to the volumes of imports from the USA, the following sources of information were available:
V zvezi z obsegom uvoza iz ZDA so bili na voljo naslednji viri informacij:
the Eurostat data for the different CN codes under which the product was classified;
podatki Eurostata za različne oznake KN, pod katere je bil izdelek uvrščen,
the USA export statistics;
statistični podatki ZDA o izvozu,
other statistical information of confidential nature on imports provided by interested parties.
druge zaupne statistične informacije o uvozu, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane stranke.
However, analysis of this information showed that the Eurostat data could not be used for the purpose of assessing consumption since until the end of 2007 there was no distinct CN code available for the customs classification of the various types of the product concerned.
Vendar je analiza teh informacij pokazala, da se podatki Eurostata ne morejo uporabiti za oceno potrošnje, ker do konca leta 2007 ni bilo jasne oznake KN, ki bi bila na voljo kot carinska oznaka za različne vrste zadevnega izdelka.
Imports of the product concerned were classified under a number of codes which also contained import data of other products.
Uvoz zadevnega izdelka se je razvrstil pod številne oznake, ki prav tako vključujejo podatke o uvozu drugih izdelkov.
Hence, it was considered more appropriate to use the US exports statistics for establishing reliable imports and consumption figures and import trends.
Zato se je zdelo primerneje, da se za določanje zanesljivih podatkov o uvozu in potrošnji ter trendov uvoza uporabijo statistični podatki ZDA o izvozu.
In using this source of information, account was taken of the shipment time needed for the goods to arrive from the USA to the Community and thus the export statistics were adjusted by one month in order to take account of this time-lag.
Pri uporabi tega vira informacij se je upošteval čas, v katerem blago iz ZDA prispe v Skupnost, pri čemer se je ta zakasnitev upoštevala tako, da so se statistični podatki o izvozu prilagodili za en mesec.
With regard to imports from other countries and exports of the Community producers, in view of the limitation regarding the use of Eurostat data described above, the investigation relied on the data reported in the complaint.
V zvezi z uvozom iz drugih držav in izvozom proizvajalcev Skupnosti se je glede na omejitev v zvezi z uporabo podatkov Eurostata, kakor je opisano zgoraj, preiskava oprla na podatke, ki so bili sporočeni v pritožbi.
Based on the above, it was found that Community consumption of biodiesel increased by 107 % between 2005 and 2007 and then slightly decreased in the IP by 1 percentage point.
Na podlagi navedenega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je potrošnja biodizla v Skupnosti med letoma 2005 in 2007 narasla za 107 % in se nato nekoliko zmanjšala v OP, tj. za eno odstotno točko.
Overall, consumption more than doubled over the period analysed.
Skupno se je potrošnja v analiziranem obdobju več kot podvojila.
The increase in demand was mainly due to the incentives taken by Member States to promote the use of bio-fuels following the adoption of Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 May 2003 on the promotion of the use of bio-fuels or other renewable fuels for transport [12] and Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity [13].
Večje povpraševanje je bilo zlasti posledica spodbud držav članic k pospeševanju rabe biogoriv po sprejetju Direktive 2003/30/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. maja 2003 o pospeševanju rabe biogoriv in drugih obnovljivih goriv v sektorju prevoza [12] ter Direktive Sveta 2003/96/ES z dne 27. oktobra 2003 o prestrukturiranju okvira Skupnosti za obdavčitev energentov in električne energije [13].
Source: USA export statistics.
Vir: statistični podatki ZDA o izvozu.
Imports from USA
Uvoz iz ZDA
Import volumes from the USA increased significantly from around 11500 tonnes in 2005 to around 1137000 tonnes in the IP.
Obseg uvoza iz ZDA se je znatno povečal s približno 11500 ton v letu 2005 na približno 1137000 ton v OP.
Splash and dash is a term used by biodiesel operators to describe a pattern by which biodiesel of allegedly foreign origin is transhipped to the Community via the USA where it is mixed with basically a drop (0,01 % of the final blend) of conventional diesel in order for the blender to avail himself of a subsidy in the USA.
Splash and dash je izraz, ki ga uporabljajo dobavitelji biodizla za opis vzorca, po katerem se biodizel domnevno tujega izvora pretovori v Skupnost prek ZDA, kjer se zmeša z minimalno količino (0,01 % končne mešanice) konvencionalnega dizelskega goriva, tako da je pripravljavec mešanice upravičen do subvencije v ZDA.
US parties have claimed that splash and dash explains the surge of US imports into the Community market, as it allegedly represented 40 % of US imports during the IP.
Ameriške stranke so trdile, da pojav splash and dash pojasnjuje nenadno povečanje uvoza ZDA na trg Skupnosti, saj naj bi predstavljal 40 % uvoza iz ZDA v OP.
These parties have also claimed that because the investigation was initiated against imports of biodiesel originating in the USA, the quantities concerned by the splash and dash should be separated from the injury analysis and treated as imports from other third countries.
Te stranke so trdile tudi, da je treba zaradi preiskave v zvezi z uvozom biodizla s poreklom iz ZDA, količine, ki jih zadeva pojav splash and dash, ločiti od analize škode ter obravnavati kot uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav.
On the other hand the complainant argued that imports of splash and dash, if any, would at most represent 10 % of the US export volumes, and would thus be insignificant and not alter the findings that large quantities of dumped imports from the USA entered the Community market, in particular during the IP.
Po drugi strani je pritožnik trdil, da je morebiten uvoz splash and dash predstavljal največ 10 % obsega ameriškega izvoza in je zato zanemarljiv ter ne vpliva na ugotovitve o velikem obsegu dampinškega uvoza iz ZDA na trg Skupnosti, zlasti v OP.
The investigation has shown that the US export statistics do not allow one to distinguish between any biodiesel exported under the alleged splash and dash process and the other US exports recorded in their ‘Exports’ chapter.
Preiskava je pokazala, da statistični podatki ZDA o izvozu ne omogočajo razlikovanja med biodizlom, izvoženim v okviru domnevnega procesa splash and dash, in drugim ameriškim izvozom, zabeleženim v poglavju „Izvoz“.
In the same statistics there were hardly any quantities found to be declared under the ‘Re-Exports’ chapter.
V istih statističnih podatkih so v poglavju „Ponovni izvoz“ navedene zelo majhne količine.
The US authorities also stated that all quantities included in their ‘Exports’ chapter are products deemed to be originating in the USA.
Ameriški pristojni organi so navedli tudi, da predstavljajo vse količine, vključene v poglavje „Izvoz“, izdelke s poreklom iz ZDA.