natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Decisions to delegate adopted in accordance with Rule 72(4) above shall specify the scope of the powers delegated, their limits and period of validity, as well as stating whether they may be subdelegated.’
Akti o prenosu v skladu s petim odstavkom tega člena določajo obseg prenesenih pooblastil in njihovo vsebinsko in časovno omejitev ter ali lahko imetniki prenesenih pooblastil to pravico prenesejo naprej.“
The new text entered into force on the day of its adoption.
Novo besedilo je začelo veljati na dan, ko je bilo sprejeto.
The full text of the Rules of Procedure of the Committee with the latest modifications approved in plenary session on 5 July 2006 was published in OJ L 93 of 3 April 2007.
Celotno besedilo poslovnika Odbora z zadnjimi spremembami, sprejetimi na plenarnem zasedanju 5. julija 2006, je bilo objavljeno 3. aprila 2007 v UL L 93.
Amendments to the Practice Directions to Parties
Spremembe Praktičnih navodil za stranke
THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
SODIŠČE PRVE STOPNJE EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI
Having regard to Article 150 of its Rules of Procedure;
ob upoštevanju člena 150 svojega Poslovnika;
Having regard to the Practice Directions to Parties adopted on 5 July 2007;
ob upoštevanju Praktičnih navodil za stranke, sprejetih 5. julija 2007;
HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS TO THE PRACTICE DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES:
SPREJEMA TE SPREMEMBE PRAKTIČNIH NAVODIL ZA STRANKE:
At point 9, the words ‘The first page of’ shall be inserted before the words ‘each copy’, and the word ‘signed’ shall be replaced by the word ‘initialled’.
V točki 9 se besede „Na vsakem prepisu“ nadomestijo z besedami „Prvo stran vsakega prepisa“, beseda „podpiše“ pa se nadomesti z besedo „parafira“.
The following indent and text shall be added to point 10 before the penultimate indent:
V točki 10 se pred predzadnjo alineo doda alinea s tem besedilom:
15 pages for the reply and the rejoinder in appeal cases and in intellectual property cases;’.
15 strani za repliko in dupliko v pritožbenih zadevah in zadevah s področja intelektualne lastnine,“.
The following sentence shall be added at the end of point 15:
Točka 15 se dopolni s tem stavkom:
‘In addition, the pleas in law put forward should ideally each be given a heading to enable them to be identified easily.’
„Poleg tega je zaželeno, da se vsakemu od navedenih tožbenih razlogov doda naslov, da bi bili hitreje prepoznavni.“
The following sentence shall be added at the end of point 19:
Točka 19 se dopolni s tem stavkom:
‘It must be produced separately from the documents annexed in support of the action and must also be sent by email, as an ordinary electronic file, to CFI.Registry@curia.europa.eu, indicating the case to which it relates.’
„Predložiti ga je treba ločeno od dokumentov, priloženih v podporo tožbi, prav tako pa ga je treba z elektronsko pošto, v obliki navadnega elektronskega dokumenta, poslati na naslov CFI.Registry@curia.europa.eu, z navedbo zadeve, na katero se nanaša.“
Point 36(e) shall be replaced by the following:
V točki 36 se besedilo pod točko (e) nadomesti s tem besedilom:
a reference to the date of receipt by the appellant of the decision of the Civil Service Tribunal;’
navedbo datuma, ko je stranka, ki vlaga pritožbo, prejela odločbo Sodišča za uslužbence;“
The following sentence shall be added at the end of point 41:
Točka 41 se dopolni s tem stavkom:
‘It must be produced separately from the documents annexed in support of the appeal and must also be sent by email, as an ordinary electronic file, to CFI.Registry@curia.europa.eu, indicating the case to which it relates.’
„Predložiti ga je treba ločeno od dokumentov, priloženih v podporo tožbi, prav tako pa ga je treba z elektronsko pošto, v obliki navadnega elektronskega dokumenta, poslati na naslov CFI.Registry@curia.europa.eu, z navedbo zadeve, na katero se nanaša.“
Point 44(c) shall be replaced by the following:
V točki 44 se besedilo pod točko (c) nadomesti s tem besedilom:
the date of receipt of the appeal by that party;’
datum, ko je stranka prejela pritožbo;“
At point 51(a), the following words shall be added after the word ‘annex’: ‘(by reference to the pleading to which the documents are annexed, using a letter and a number: for example, Annex A.1, A.2, … for annexes to the application; B.1, B.2, … for annexes to the defence; C.1, C.2, … for annexes to the reply; D.1, D.2, … for annexes to the rejoinder)’ and the final paragraph of point 51 shall be deleted.
Točki 51(a) se za besedo „priloge“ dodajo besede „(z navedbo vloge, kateri so priložene listine, z uporabo črke in številke: na primer priloga A.1, A.2 itd. za priloge k vlogi; B.1, B.2 itd. za priloge k odgovoru na tožbo; C.1, C.2 itd. za priloge k repliki; D.1, D.2 itd. za priloge k dupliki)“, zadnji odstavek točke 51 pa se izbriše.
At point 52, the words ‘The pages of documents annexed to a pleading must be numbered’ shall be replaced by the words ‘The documents annexed to a pleading must be paginated’, and the words ‘page numbering’ shall be replaced by the word ‘pagination’.
V točki 52 se besede „Strani listin, priloženih k vlogi, morajo biti oštevilčene“ nadomestijo z besedami „Listine, priložene k vlogi, morajo biti oštevilčene“, beseda „številčenje“ pa se nadomesti z besedo „oštevilčenje“.
The following shall be added at the end of point 73:
Točka 73 se dopolni s tem besedilom:
‘An application for confidential treatment may not be lodged as a confidential version.’
„Take zahteve po zaupnem obravnavanju ni mogoče vložiti v zaupni različici.“
At point 81, the words ‘2 to 3 pages’ shall be replaced by the words ‘2 pages’.
V točki 81 se besede „od 2 do 3 strani“ nadomestijo z besedami „2 strani“.
New sections ‘L.
Za točko 83 se vstavita nova naslova „L.
Applications for leave to lodge a reply or rejoinder in intellectual property cases’ and ‘M.
Vloge za dovoljenje za vložitev replike ali duplike v zadevah intelektualne lastnine“ in „M.
Applications for hearing of oral argument in intellectual property cases’ shall be inserted after point 83.
Vloge za ustno obravnavo v zadevah intelektualne lastnine“.
Section ‘L.
Naslov „L.
Applications for legal aid’ shall become Section ‘N.
Vloga za pravno pomoč“ postane naslov „N.
Applications for legal aid’.
Vloga za pravno pomoč“.
Points 84 to 87 shall be replaced by the following:
Točke od 84 do 87 se nadomestijo s tem besedilom:
Applications for leave to lodge a reply or rejoinder in intellectual property cases
Vloge za dovoljenje za vložitev replike ali duplike v zadevah s področja intelektualne lastnine
Under Article 135(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the President may, on application within the period prescribed by that provision, allow a reply or a rejoinder to be submitted if it is necessary in order to enable the party concerned to put forward his point of view.
Na podlagi vloge, vložene v roku iz člena 135(2) Poslovnika, lahko predsednik v skladu s to določbo dovoli vložitev replike ali duplike, če je ta potrebna za to, da lahko zadevna stranka zagovarja svoje stališče.
Save in exceptional circumstances, such an application must not exceed 2 pages and must be confined to summarising the precise reasons for which, in the opinion of the party concerned, a reply or a rejoinder is necessary.
Taka vloga ne sme, razen v posebnih okoliščinah, preseči 2 strani in mora vsebovati le povzetek posebnih razlogov, zaradi katerih je, po mnenju zadevne stranke, replika ali duplika potrebna.
The request must be intelligible in itself, without necessitating reference to the main pleadings.
Vloga mora biti sama po sebi razumljiva, tako da se ni treba sklicevati na glavne vloge.
Applications for hearing of oral argument in intellectual property cases
Vloge za ustno obravnavo v zadevah s področja intelektualne lastnine
The Court may decide to rule on the action without an oral procedure, unless one of the parties submits an application to be heard within the period prescribed under Article 135a of the Rules of Procedure.
Sodišče prve stopnje lahko o tožbi odloči brez ustnega postopka, razen če ena od strank vloži vlogo, da želi podati svoja ustna stališča v roku, določenem v členu 135a Poslovnika.
The application must set out the reasons for which the party wishes to be heard.
V vlogi morajo biti navedeni razlogi, zaradi katerih stranka želi biti slišana.
That reasoning must be based on a real assessment of the benefit of a hearing to the party in question and must indicate the elements of the file or arguments which that party considers it necessary to develop or disprove more fully at a hearing.
Ta obrazložitev mora izhajati iz dejanske presoje koristnosti ustne obravnave za zadevno stranko in v njej morajo biti navedeni elementi iz spisa ali iz trditev, ki jih stranka namerava podrobneje podpreti ali izpodbiti na obravnavi.
It is not sufficient to provide a general statement of reasons referring to the importance of the case or of the questions to be decided.’
Splošna obrazložitev, ki se nanaša na pomembnost zadeve ali na vprašanja, ki jih je treba obravnavati, ne zadošča.“
The numbering of subsequent points shall be adjusted accordingly.
Oštevilčenje naslednjih točk se posledično spremeni.
At point 91, now point 95, the reference to point 85 shall be replaced by a reference to point 89.
V točki 91, sedaj točka 95, se sklicevanje na točko 85 nadomesti s sklicevanjem na točko 89.
At point 100, now point 104, the words ‘(in joined cases, each of the main parties will be allowed 15 minutes for each case and each intervener will be allowed 10 minutes for each case)’ shall be inserted after the words ‘10 minutes’.
V točki 100, sedaj točka 104, se za besedami „10 minut“ vstavijo besede „(v združenih zadevah ima vsaka glavna stranka 15 minut za vsako od zadev in vsak intervenient 10 minut za vsako od zadev)“.
At point 102, now point 106, the following sentence shall be added at the end of the first paragraph:
V točki 102, sedaj točka 106, se na koncu prvega odstavka doda stavek:
‘However, in intellectual property cases, the Report for the Hearing is confined to setting out the pleas in law and a succinct summary of the parties' arguments.’
„Vendar so v zadevah s področja intelektualne lastnine v poročilu za obravnavo navedeni le tožbeni razlogi in natančen povzetek trditev strank.“
These amendments to the Practice Directions to Parties shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Te spremembe Praktičnih navodil za stranke se objavijo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Done at Luxembourg, 16 June 2009.
V Luxembourgu, 16. junija 2009
Amendments to the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities
Sprememba poslovnika Sodišča prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti
Having regard to the approval of the Council given on 15 June 2009,
ob upoštevanju odobritve Sveta z dne 15. junija 2009,
HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS TO ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE:
SPREJEMA TE SPREMEMBE SVOJEGA POSLOVNIKA:
The Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 2 May 1991 (OJ L 136 of 30 May 1991, p. 1, with corrigendum OJ L 317 of 19 November 1991, p. 34), amended on 15 September 1994 (OJ L 249 of 24 September 1994, p. 17), 17 February 1995 (OJ L 44 of 28 February 1995, p. 64), 6 July 1995 (OJ L 172 of 22 July 1995, p. 3), 12 March 1997 (OJ L 103 of 19 April 1997, p. 6, with corrigendum OJ L 351 of 23 December 1997, p. 72), 17 May 1999 (OJ L 135 of 29 May 1999, p. 92), 6 December 2000 (OJ L 322 of 19 December 2000, p. 4), 21 May 2003 (OJ L 147 of 14 June 2003, p. 22), 19 April 2004 (OJ L 132 of 29 April 2004, p. 3), 21 April 2004 (OJ L 127 of 29 April 2004, p. 108), 12 October 2005 (OJ L 298 of 15 November 2005, p. 1), 18 December 2006 (OJ L 386 of 29 December 2006, p. 45), 12 June 2008 (OJ L 179 of 8 July 2008, p. 12), 14 January 2009 (OJ L 24 of 28 January 2009, p. 9) and 16 February 2009 (OJ L 60 of 4 March 2009, p. 3), are hereby amended as follows:
Poslovnik Sodišča prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti, sprejet 2. maja 1991 (UL L 136, 30.5.1991, str. 1, in popravek v UL L 317, 19.11.1991, str. 34), kakor je bil spremenjen 15. septembra 1994 (UL L 249, 24.9.1994, str. 17), 17. februarja 1995 (UL L 44, 28.2.1995, str. 64), 6. julija 1995 (UL L 172, 22.7.1995, str. 3), 12. marca 1997 (UL L 103, 19.4.1997, str. 6, in popravek v UL L 351, 23.12.1997, str. 72), 17. maja 1999 (UL L 135, 29.5.1999, str. 92), 6. decembra 2000 (UL L 322, 19.12.2000, str. 4), 21. maja 2003 (UL L 147, 14.6.2003, str. 22), 19. aprila 2004 (UL L 132, 29.4.2004, str. 3), 21. aprila 2004 (UL L 127, 29.4.2004, str. 108), 12. oktobra 2005 (UL L 298, 15.11.2005, str. 1), 18. decembra 2006 (UL L 386, 29.12.2006, str. 45), 12. junija 2008 (UL L 179, 8.7.2008, str. 12), 14. januarja 2009 (UL L 24, 28.1.2009, str. 9) in 16. februarja 2009 (UL L 60, 4.3.2009, str. 3), se spremeni tako:
After Article 121, there shall be inserted the following:
Za členom 121 se vstavi to besedilo:
‘CHAPTER 4a
„POGLAVJE 4a:
DECISIONS OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE GIVEN AFTER ITS DECISION HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND THE CASE REFERRED BACK TO IT
ODLOČBE SODIŠČA PRVE STOPNJE PO PONOVNEM PREIZKUSU IN VRNITVI V NOVO ODLOČANJE
Article 121a
Člen 121a
Where the Court of Justice reviews a judgment or an order of the Court of First Instance and refers the case back to that Court, the latter shall be seised of the case by the judgment so referring it.
Če Sodišče ponovno preizkusi sodbo ali sklep Sodišča prve stopnje in mu vrne zadevo v novo odločanje, se postopek pred Sodiščem prve stopnje začne s sodbo, s katero je bilo odločeno o vrnitvi v novo odločanje.
Article 121b
Člen 121b
Where the Court of Justice refers back to the Court of First Instance a case which was originally heard by a Chamber, the President of the Court of First Instance may assign the case to another Chamber composed of the same number of Judges.
Če Sodišče vrne zadevo v novo odločanje, lahko predsednik Sodišča prve stopnje dodeli zadevo drugemu senatu, ki ga sestavlja enako število sodnikov kot v prvotnem senatu.
Where the Court of Justice refers back to the Court of First Instance a case which was originally heard by the Court of First Instance sitting in plenary session or by the Grand Chamber, the case shall be assigned to that Court or that Chamber as the case may be.
Če Sodišče v novo odločanje vrne zadevo, o kateri je Sodišče prve stopnje odločalo na občni seji ali v velikem senatu, se zadeva dodeli sestavi Sodišča prve stopnje, ki je izdala zadevno odločbo.
In the cases provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, Articles 13(2), 14(1) and 51(1) shall apply.
V primerih iz odstavkov 1 in 2 se uporabljajo členi 13(2), 14(1) in 51(1).
Article 121c
Člen 121c
Within one month of the service of the judgment of the Court of Justice, the parties to the proceedings before the Court of First Instance may lodge their observations on the conclusions to be drawn from that judgment for the outcome of the proceedings.
V roku enega meseca od vročitve sodbe Sodišča lahko stranke iz postopka pred Sodiščem prve stopnje podajo pisna stališča glede učinkov te sodbe na rešitev spora.
This time-limit may not be extended.
Tega roka ni mogoče podaljšati.
The Court of First Instance may, by way of measures of organisation of procedure, invite the parties to the proceedings before it to lodge written submissions and may decide to hear the parties in an oral procedure.
Sodišče prve stopnje lahko stranke iz postopka pred njim v okviru ukrepov procesnega vodstva pozove, naj predložijo vloge, in odloči, da se jih zasliši v ustnem postopku.
Article 121d
Člen 121d
The Court of First Instance shall decide on the costs relating to the proceedings instituted before it following the review of its decision by the Court of Justice.’
Sodišče prve stopnje odloči o stroških postopka, ki poteka pred njim po ponovnem preizkusu.“.
In Article 134(1), the following text shall be added to the sentence after the words ‘Court of First Instance’: ‘by responding to the application in the manner and within the period prescribed.’
V členu 134(1) se za besedo „intervenienti“ doda besedilo: „če v predpisani obliki in pravočasno odgovorijo na tožbo“.
New wording:
Novo besedilo:
The parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal other than the applicant may participate, as interveners, in the proceedings before the Court of First Instance by responding to the application in the manner and within the period prescribed.’
Druge stranke v postopku pred odborom za pritožbe z izjemo tožeče stranke se lahko udeležijo postopka pred Sodiščem prve stopnje kot intervenienti, če v predpisani obliki in pravočasno odgovorijo na tožbo.“
In Article 135(1), the words ‘the interveners referred to in Article 134(1) may submit’ shall be deleted and replaced by the words ‘the parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal other than the applicant shall lodge their’.
V členu 135(1) se besedilo „intervenienti iz člena 134(1) lahko […] odgovorijo“ izbriše in nadomesti z besedilom „druge stranke v postopku pred odborom za pritožbe z izjemo tožeče stranke […] odgovorijo“
‘Article 135
„Člen 135
The Office and the parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal other than the applicant shall lodge their responses to the application within a period of two months from the service of the application.
Urad in druge stranke v postopku pred odborom za pritožbe z izjemo tožeče stranke na tožbo odgovorijo v roku dveh mesecev od njene vročitve.
Article 46 shall apply to the responses.’
Za odgovor na tožbo se uporabi člen 46.“
These amendments to the Rules of Procedure, which are authentic in the languages referred to in Article 35(1) of these Rules, shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall enter into force on the first day of the second month following their publication.
Te spremembe Poslovnika, ki so verodostojne v jezikih iz člena 35(1) Poslovnika, se objavijo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in začnejo veljati prvi dan drugega meseca po njihovi objavi.
Done at Luxembourg, 7 July 2009.
V Luxembourgu, 7. julija 2009 Sodni tajnik
Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2009
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1/2009
amending Regulation (EC) No 1255/96 temporarily suspending the autonomous common customs tariff duties on certain industrial, agricultural and fishery products
o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 1255/96 o začasni opustitvi avtonomnih dajatev skupne carinske tarife za določene industrijske, kmetijske in ribiške proizvode
After reviewing all autonomous tariff suspensions with an expiry date of 31 December 2008, 610 products which are currently listed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1255/96 should be withdrawn from the list because it is no longer in the interest of the Community to maintain the suspension of autonomous common customs tariff duties for those products.
Poleg tega je treba za nekatere proizvode s seznama iz Priloge k Uredbi (ES) št. 1255/96 spremeniti opis zaradi upoštevanja tehničnega razvoja proizvodov in gospodarskih gibanj na trgu. Navedene proizvode je treba obravnavati, kot da bi bili umaknjeni s seznama, zato jih je treba na seznam vključiti kot nove proizvode. Za šest proizvodov je treba dodati dodatno oznako KN za poenostavitev uvoza v okviru zadevnega ukrepa.
For ease of comprehension, in view of the large number of amendments coming into force on 1 January 2009, the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1255/96 should be replaced by a completely new version which has effect from the same date and in which new, amended or prolonged entries are indicated with an asterisk.
Po pregledu vseh avtonomnih tarifnih opustitev, ki potečejo 31. decembra 2008, je treba 610 proizvodov, ki so na seznamu v Prilogi k Uredbi (ES) št. 1255/96, umakniti s tega seznama, saj ohranitev opustitev avtonomnih dajatev skupne carinske tarife ni več v interesu Skupnosti. (4) Za lažje razumevanje in zaradi velikega števila sprememb, ki bodo začele veljati 1. januarja 2009, je treba Prilogo k Uredbi (ES) št. 1255/96 nadomestiti s povsem novo različico, ki začne veljati z istim datumom in v kateri so novi in spremenjeni vnosi označeni z zvezdico.
Experience has shown the need to provide for an expiry date for the suspensions listed in Regulation (EC) No 1255/96 to ensure that account is taken of technological and economic changes.
Izkušnje so pokazale, da je treba določiti datum izteka za opustitve, ki jih navaja Uredba (ES) št. 1255/96, in tako zagotoviti upoštevanje tehnoloških in gospodarskih sprememb.
This should not exclude the premature termination of certain measures or their continuation beyond the suspension period, if economic reasons are submitted, in accordance with the principles laid down in the Commission Communication of 1998 concerning autonomous tariff suspensions and quotas.
To pa ne sme izključevati predčasne ukinitve nekaterih ukrepov ali njihovega nadaljnjega izvajanja po obdobju opustitve, če se v skladu z načeli iz Sporočila Komisije iz leta 1998 o avtonomnih tarifnih opustitvah in tarifnih kvotah za to navedejo gospodarski razlogi.
Regulation (EC) No 1255/96 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 1255/96 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Having regard to the economic importance of this Regulation, it is necessary to rely on the grounds of urgency provided for in point I(3) of the Protocol on the role of national parliaments in the European Union annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaties establishing the European Communities.
Zaradi gospodarskega pomena te uredbe se je treba sklicevati na razloge nujnosti iz točke I(3) Protokola o vlogi nacionalnih parlamentov v Evropski uniji, priloženega k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbam o ustanovitvi Evropskih skupnosti.
Since the suspensions laid down in this Regulation have to take effect from 1 January 2009, this Regulation should apply from the same date and enter into force immediately,
Ker morajo začasne opustitve iz te uredbe začeti učinkovati s 1. januarjem 2009, je treba to uredbo uporabljati od istega datuma in mora začeti veljati takoj –
The temporary suspensions of the autonomous duties of the Common Customs Tariff for the products set out in the Annex shall apply from 1 January 2009.
Začasne opustitve avtonomnih dajatev skupne carinske tarife za proizvode, navedene v Prilogi, se uporabljajo od 1. januarja 2009.
They shall expire on the dates listed in the Annex.
Veljati prenehajo na datume iz navedene priloge.
Red snapper (Lutjanus purpureus), fresh, chilled, for processing [1] [2]
Rdeči hlastač (Lutjanus purpureus), svež, ohlajen, za predelavo [1] [2]
Fillets and meat of dogfish (Squalus acanthias), frozen
Fileti in meso morskih psov (Squalus acanthias), zamrznjeni
Peas in pods, of the species Pisum sativum of the variety Hortense axiphium, frozen, of a thickness of not more than 6 mm, to be used, in their pods, in the manufacture of prepared meals [1] [2]
Stročji grah vrste Pisum sativum, podvrste Hortense axiphium, zamrznjen, debeline ne več kot 6 mm, ki se uporablja skupaj s stroki v proizvodnji pripravljenih jedi [1] [2]
goods of heading No 3401 [1]
izdelkov iz tarifne številke 3401 [1]
Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.), for the processing industry for manufacture into pastes or spreads [1]
Pacifiški losos (Oncorhyncus spp.), za predelovalno industrijo za predelavo v paste ali namaze [1]
Bamboo shoots, prepared or preserved, in immediate packings of a net content of more than 5 kg
Bambusovi vršički, pripravljeni ali konzervirani, v izvirnem pakiranju z neto vsebino več kot 5 kg
Sweet cherries containing added spirit, whether or not with a sugar content of 9 % by weight, of a diameter of not more than 19,9 mm, with stone, for use in chocolate products [1]
Sladke češnje, ki vsebujejo dodan alkohol, z vsebnostjo sladkorja 9 mas. % ali brez, s premerom ne več kot 19,9 mm, s koščico, za uporabo v čokoladnih izdelkih [1]
Mixture of isomers 2.4,4-trimethylpent-1-ene and 2.4,4-trimethylpent-2-ene
Mešanica izomerov 2,4,4-trimetilpent-1-en in 2,4,4-trimetilpent-2-en
Yellow phosphorus
Rumeni fosfor
Silicon dioxide in the form of powder, for use in the manufacture of high performance liquid chromatography columns (HPLC) and sample preparation cartridges [1]
Silicijev dioksid v obliki praška, namenjen za uporabo v proizvodnji kolon za visoko ločljivo tekočinsko kromatografijo (HPLC) in kartuš „cartridge“ za pripravo vzorcev [1]