natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The scheduled date of a trial may for practical reasons initially be expressed as several possible dates within a short period of time.
Predvideni datum sojenja se lahko iz praktičnih razlogov prvotno opredeli kot več možnih datumov v krajšem časovnem obdobju.
The recognition and execution of a decision rendered following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person should not be refused where the person concerned, being aware of the scheduled trial, was defended at the trial by a legal counsellor to whom he or she had given a mandate to do so, ensuring that legal assistance is practical and effective.
Priznanje in izvršitev odločbe, izdane v sojenju, na katerem zadevna oseba ni bila osebno navzoča, se ne bi smela zavrniti, če je zadevno osebo, ki je bila seznanjena z načrtovanim sojenjem, na sojenju zastopal pravni zastopnik, ki ga je za to pooblastila, pri čemer mora biti zagotovljeno, da je pravna pomoč praktična in učinkovita.
In this context, it should not matter whether the legal counsellor was chosen, appointed and paid by the person concerned, or whether this legal counsellor was appointed and paid by the State, it being understood that the person concerned should deliberately have chosen to be represented by a legal counsellor instead of appearing in person at the trial.
V zvezi s tem ne bi smelo biti pomembno, ali je pravnega zastopnika izbrala, določila in plačala zadevna oseba ali ga je določila in plačala država, pri čemer se razume, da se je zadevna oseba zavestno odločila, da jo zastopa pravni zastopnik, namesto da se sama udeleži sojenja.
The appointment of the legal counsellor and related issues are a matter of national law.
Za imenovanje pravnega zastopnika in s tem povezana vprašanja se uporablja nacionalno pravo.
Common solutions concerning grounds for non-recognition in the relevant existing Framework Decisions should take into account the diversity of situations with regard to the right of the person concerned to a retrial or an appeal.
V skupnih rešitvah glede razlogov za zavrnitev priznanja v obstoječih zadevnih okvirnih sklepih bi morala biti upoštevana raznolikost razmer v zvezi s pravico zadevne osebe do ponovnega sojenja ali pritožbe.
Such a retrial, or appeal, is aimed at guaranteeing the rights of the defence and is characterised by the following elements: the person concerned has the right to be present, the merits of the case, including fresh evidence are re-examined, and the proceedings can lead to the original decision being reversed.
Namen takšnega ponovnega sojenja ali pritožbe je zagotoviti pravico do obrambe, zanju pa so značilni naslednji elementi: zadevna oseba ima pravico, da je prisotna, vsebina zadeve bo skupaj z novimi dokazi ponovno preučena in rezultat postopka je lahko sprememba prvotne odločbe.
The right to a retrial or appeal should be guaranteed when the decision has already been served as well as, in the case of the European arrest warrant, when it had not yet been served, but will be served without delay after the surrender.
Pravica do ponovnega sojenja ali pritožbe bi se morala zagotoviti, ko je odločba že vročena, v primeru evropskega naloga za prijetje pa tudi, ko še ni bila vročena, a bo vročena takoj po predaji.
The latter case refers to a situation where the authorities failed in their attempt to contact the person, in particular because he or she sought to evade justice.
Pri slednjem gre za primer, ko organi osebe niso mogli obvestiti, zlasti ker se je poskušala izogniti roki pravice.
In case a European arrest warrant is issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence or detention order and the person concerned has not previously received any official information about the existence of the criminal proceedings against him or her, nor has been served with the judgment, this person should, following a request in the executing Member State, receive a copy of the judgment for information purposes only.
Če se evropski nalog za prijetje izda za izvršitev zaporne kazni ali ukrepa, ki vključuje odvzem prostosti, zadevna oseba pa predhodno ni prejela uradnega obvestila o kazenskem postopku zoper njo niti ji ni bila vročena sodba, bi morala ta oseba na podlagi zahteve v državi članici izvršiteljici prejeti izvod sodbe zgolj v informativne namene.
The issuing and executing judicial authorities should, where appropriate, consult each other on the need and existing possibilities to provide the person concerned with a translation of the judgment, or of essential parts thereof, in a language that the person understands.
Odreditveni in izvršitveni pravosodni organ bi se morala po potrebi posvetovati o potrebi in obstoječih možnostih, da se osebi zagotovi prevod sodbe ali njenih bistvenih delov v jezik, ki ga razume.
Such provision of the judgment should neither delay the surrender procedure nor delay the decision to execute the European arrest warrant.
Taka izročitev sodbe ne bi smela povzročiti odložitve postopka predaje niti odložitve odločitve o izvršitvi evropskega naloga za prijetje.
This Framework Decision is limited to refining the definition of grounds for non-recognition in instruments implementing the principle of mutual recognition.
Ta okvirni sklep je omejen na natančnejšo opredelitev razlogov za zavrnitev priznanja iz instrumentov, ki izvajajo načelo vzajemnega priznavanja.
Therefore, provisions such as those relating to the right to a retrial have a scope which is limited to the definition of these grounds for non-recognition.
Zato imajo na primer določbe v zvezi s pravico do ponovnega sojenja področje uporabe, ki je omejeno na opredelitev teh razlogov za zavrnitev priznanja.
They are not designed to harmonise national legislation.
Te določbe niso namenjene usklajevanju nacionalnih zakonodaj.
This Framework Decision is without prejudice to future instruments of the European Union designed to approximate the laws of the Member States in the field of criminal law.
Ta okvirni sklep ne posega v prihodnje instrumente Evropske unije, katerih cilj je približevanje zakonodaje držav članic na področju kazenskega prava.
The grounds for non-recognition are optional.
Razlogi za nepriznavanje niso obvezni.
However, the discretion of Member States for transposing these grounds into national law is particularly governed by the right to a fair trial, while taking into account the overall objective of this Framework Decision to enhance the procedural rights of persons and to facilitate judicial cooperation in criminal matters,
Vendar pa diskrecijsko pravico držav članic pri prenašanju teh razlogov v nacionalno zakonodajo ureja zlasti pravica do poštenega sojenja, pri čemer je treba upoštevati splošni cilj tega okvirnega sklepa, in sicer okrepitev procesnih pravic oseb in izboljšanje pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah –
The objectives of this Framework Decision are to enhance the procedural rights of persons subject to criminal proceedings, to facilitate judicial cooperation in criminal matters and, in particular, to improve mutual recognition of judicial decisions between Member States.
Cilji tega okvirnega sklepa so okrepiti procesne pravice oseb, zoper katere poteka kazenski postopek, poenostaviti pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah ter zlasti izboljšati vzajemno priznavanje sodnih odločb med državami članicami.
This Framework Decision shall not have the effect of modifying the obligation to respect fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles as enshrined in Article 6 of the Treaty, including the right of defence of persons subject to criminal proceedings, and any obligations incumbent upon judicial authorities in this respect shall remain unaffected.
Ta okvirni sklep ne spreminja niti obveznosti spoštovanja temeljnih pravic in temeljnih pravnih načel iz člena 6 Pogodbe, vključno s pravico do obrambe oseb, zoper katere poteka kazenski postopek, niti obveznosti, ki so v tem smislu naložene pravosodnim organom.
This Framework Decision establishes common rules for the recognition and/or execution of judicial decisions in one Member State (the executing Member State) issued by another Member State (the issuing Member State) following proceedings at which the person concerned was not present, pursuant to the provisions of Article 5(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, of Article 7(2)(g) of Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA, of Article 8(2)(e) of Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA, of Article 9(1)(i) of Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA and of Article 11(1)(h) of Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA.
Ta okvirni sklep določa skupna pravila za priznavanje in/ali izvrševanje sodnih odločb v eni državi članici (država članica izvršiteljica), ki jih izda druga država članica (država članica izdajateljica) v postopku, ki je potekal brez navzočnosti zadevne osebe, v skladu z določbami člena 5(1) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/PNZ, člena 7(2)(g) Okvirnega sklepa 2005/214/PNZ, člena 8(2)(e) Okvirnega sklepa 2006/783/PNZ, člena 9(1)(i) Okvirnega sklepa 2008/909/PNZ in člena 11(1)(h) Okvirnega sklepa 2008/947/PNZ.
Amendments to Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA
Spremembe Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/PNZ
Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA is hereby amended as follows:
Okvirni sklep 2002/584/PNZ se spremeni:
Decisions rendered following a trial at which the person did not appear in person
Odločbe, izdane na podlagi sojenja, na katerem zadevna oseba ni bila osebno navzoča
The executing judicial authority may also refuse to execute the European arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence or a detention order if the person did not appear in person at the trial resulting in the decision, unless the European arrest warrant states that the person, in accordance with further procedural requirements defined in the national law of the issuing Member State:
Izvršitveni sodni organ lahko prav tako zavrne izvršitev evropskega naloga za prijetje, ki je bil izdan za izvršitev zaporne kazni ali ukrepa, ki vključuje odvzem prostosti, če oseba ni bila osebno navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odločbo, razen če je v evropskem nalogu za prijetje navedeno, da je bila oseba v skladu z dodatnimi procesnimi zahtevami, določenimi v nacionalnem pravu odreditvene države članice:
in due time:
pravočasno
either was summoned in person and thereby informed of the scheduled date and place of the trial which resulted in the decision, or by other means actually received official information of the scheduled date and place of that trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he or she was aware of the scheduled trial;
osebno povabljena in tako obveščena o predvidenem datumu in kraju sojenja, ki se je zaključilo z odločbo, ali če je bila zadevna oseba dejansko kako drugače uradno obveščena o predvidenem datumu in kraju sojenja, in sicer tako, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila ta oseba seznanjena z načrtovanim sojenjem,
was informed that a decision may be handed down if he or she does not appear for the trial;
obveščena, da se odločba lahko izreče, če se sojenja ne udeleži,
being aware of the scheduled trial, had given a mandate to a legal counsellor, who was either appointed by the person concerned or by the State, to defend him or her at the trial, and was indeed defended by that counsellor at the trial;
je bila seznanjena z načrtovanim sojenjem in je pooblastila pravnega zastopnika, ki ga je imenovala sama ali ga je imenovala država, da jo zastopa na sojenju, in jo je ta zastopnik na sojenju dejansko zastopal,
after being served with the decision and being expressly informed about the right to a retrial, or an appeal, in which the person has the right to participate and which allows the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, to be re-examined, and which may lead to the original decision being reversed:
potem ko ji je bila vročena odločba in je bila izrecno obveščena o pravici do ponovnega sojenja ali pritožbe, v kateri ima pravico sodelovati, ki omogoča, da se vsebina zadeve skupaj z novimi dokazi ponovno preučijo, in ki lahko privede do spremembe prvotne odločbe:
expressly stated that he or she does not contest the decision;
izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe,
did not request a retrial or appeal within the applicable time frame;
ni zahtevala ponovnega sojenja ali vložila pritožbe v ustreznem roku;
was not personally served with the decision but:
ji odločba ni bila osebno vročena, ampak:
will be personally served with it without delay after the surrender and will be expressly informed of his or her right to a retrial, or an appeal, in which the person has the right to participate and which allows the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, to be re-examined, and which may lead to the original decision being reversed;
ji bo osebno vročena nemudoma po predaji in bo izrecno obveščena o pravici do ponovnega sojenja ali pritožbe, v kateri ima pravico sodelovati, ki omogoča, da se vsebina zadeve skupaj z novimi dokazi ponovno preučijo, in ki lahko privede do spremembe prvotne odločbe,
will be informed of the time frame within which he or she has to request such a retrial or appeal, as mentioned in the relevant European arrest warrant.
bo obveščena o roku, v katerem mora zahtevati ponovno sojenje ali vložiti pritožbo, kakor je navedeno v zadevnem evropskem nalogu za prijetje.
In case the European arrest warrant is issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence or detention order under the conditions of paragraph 1(d) and the person concerned has not previously received any official information about the existence of the criminal proceedings against him or her, he or she may, when being informed about the content of the European arrest warrant, request to receive a copy of the judgment before being surrendered.
Če se evropski nalog za prijetje izda za izvršitev zaporne kazni ali ukrepa, ki vključuje odvzem prostosti, pod pogoji iz odstavka 1(d), zadevna oseba pa predhodno ni prejela uradnega obvestila o kazenskem postopku zoper njo, lahko ta oseba, ko je obveščena o vsebini evropskega naloga za prijetje, pred predajo zahteva izvod sodbe.
Immediately after having been informed about the request, the issuing authority shall provide the copy of the judgment via the executing authority to the person sought.
Takoj ko je odreditveni organ obveščen o zahtevi, prek izvršitvenega organa iskani osebi zagotovi izvod sodbe.
The request of the person sought shall neither delay the surrender procedure nor delay the decision to execute the European arrest warrant.
Postopek predaje ali izdaja sklepa o izvršitvi evropskega naloga za prijetje se zaradi takšne zahteve s strani iskane osebe ne odloži.
The provision of the judgment to the person concerned is for information purposes only; it shall neither be regarded as a formal service of the judgment nor actuate any time limits applicable for requesting a retrial or appeal.
Sodba se zadevni osebi izroči zgolj v informativne namene; ta izročitev se ne šteje za uradno vročitev sodbe niti ne vpliva na roke v zvezi z zahtevo za ponovno sojenje ali vložitvijo pritožbe.
In case a person is surrendered under the conditions of paragraph (1)(d) and he or she has requested a retrial or appeal, the detention of that person awaiting such retrial or appeal shall, until these proceedings are finalised, be reviewed in accordance with the law of the issuing Member State, either on a regular basis or upon request of the person concerned.
Če se oseba preda pod pogoji iz odstavka 1(d) in če je ta oseba zahtevala ponovno sojenje ali je vložila pritožbo, se pridržanje osebe, ki čaka na ponovno sojenje ali postopek pritožbe, pregleduje redno ali na njeno zahtevo, in sicer v skladu s pravom odreditvene države članice, dokler ni postopek ponovnega sojenja ali pritožbe zaključen.
Such a review shall in particular include the possibility of suspension or interruption of the detention.
Takšen pregled zlasti vključuje možnost opustitve ali prekinitve pridržanja.
The retrial or appeal shall begin within due time after the surrender.’;
Ponovno sojenje ali postopek pritožbe se začne po preteku ustreznega časa od po predaje.“
in Article 5, paragraph 1 shall be deleted;
V členu 5 se črta odstavek 1.
in the Annex (EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT), point (d) shall be replaced by the following:
V Prilogi (EVROPSKI NALOG ZA PRIJETJE) se točka (d) nadomesti z naslednjim:
Indicate if the person appeared in person at the trial resulting in the decision:
Navedite, ali je bila oseba osebno navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odločbo:
Yes, the person appeared in person at the trial resulting in the decision.
Da, oseba je bila osebno navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odločbo.
No, the person did not appear in person at the trial resulting in the decision.
Ne, oseba ni bila osebno navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odločbo.
If you have ticked the box under point 2, please confirm the existence of one of the following:
Če ste označili polje pod točko 2 zgoraj, prosimo, potrdite obstoj ene od naslednjih možnosti:
the person was summoned in person on … (day/month/year) and thereby informed of the scheduled date and place of the trial which resulted in the decision and was informed that a decision may be handed down if he or she does not appear for the trial;
oseba je bila osebno povabljena dne … (dan/mesec/leto) in tako obveščena o predvidenem datumu in kraju sojenja, ki se je zaključilo z odločbo, in je bila obveščena, da se odločba lahko izreče, če se sojenja ne udeleži;
the person was not summoned in person but by other means actually received official information of the scheduled date and place of the trial which resulted in the decision, in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he or she was aware of the scheduled trial, and was informed that a decision may be handed down if he or she does not appear for the trial;
oseba ni bila osebno povabljena, temveč je bila kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o predvidenem datumu in kraju sojenja, ki se je zaključilo z odločbo, in sicer tako, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila zadevna oseba seznanjena z načrtovanim sojenjem, obveščena je bila tudi, da se odločba lahko izreče, če se sojenja ne udeleži;
being aware of the scheduled trial, the person had given a mandate to a legal counsellor, who was either appointed by the person concerned or by the State, to defend him or her at the trial, and was indeed defended by that counsellor at the trial;
oseba je bila seznanjena z načrtovanim sojenjem in je pooblastila pravnega zastopnika, ki ga je imenovala sama ali ga je imenovala država, da jo zastopa na sojenju, in jo je ta zastopnik na sojenju dejansko zastopal;
the person was served with the decision on … (day/month/year) and was expressly informed about the right to a retrial or appeal, in which he or she has the right to participate and which allows the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, to be re-examined, and which may lead to the original decision being reversed, and
osebi je bila odločba vročena dne … (dan/mesec/leto) in je bila izrecno obveščena o pravici do ponovnega sojenja ali pritožbe, v kateri ima pravico sodelovati, ki omogoča, da se vsebina zadeve skupaj z novimi dokazi ponovno preučijo, in ki lahko privede do spremembe prvotne odločbe, in
the person expressly stated that he or she does not contest this decision,
oseba je izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe;
the person did not request a retrial or appeal within the applicable time frame;
oseba v ustreznem roku ni zahtevala ponovnega sojenja ali ni vložila pritožbe;
the person was not personally served with the decision, but
osebi odločba ni bila osebno vročena, ampak
the person will be personally served with this decision without delay after the surrender, and
bo osebi ta odločba osebno vročena nemudoma po predaji, in
when served with the decision, the person will be expressly informed of his or her right to a retrial or appeal, in which he or she has the right to participate and which allows the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, to be re-examined, and which may lead to the original decision being reversed, and
bo oseba po vročitvi odločbe izrecno obveščena o pravici do ponovnega sojenja ali pritožbe, v kateri ima pravico sodelovati, ki omogoča, da se vsebina zadeve skupaj z novimi dokazi ponovno preučijo, in ki lahko privede do spremembe prvotne odločbe, in
the person will be informed of the time frame within which he or she has to request a retrial or appeal, which will be … days.
bo oseba obveščena o roku, v katerem mora zahtevati ponovno sojenje ali vložiti pritožbo, ki znaša … dni.
If you have ticked the box under points 3.1b, 3.2 or 3.3 above, please provide information about how the relevant condition has been met:
Če ste označili polje pod točko 3.1b, 3.2 ali 3.3 zgoraj, prosimo, da navedete informacije o tem, kako je bil izpolnjen zadevni pogoj:
Amendments to Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA
Spremembe Okvirnega sklepa 2005/214/PNZ
Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA is hereby amended as follows:
Okvirni sklep 2005/214/PNZ se spremeni:
Article 7(2) is hereby amended as follows:
Člen 7(2) se spremeni:
according to the certificate provided for in Article 4, the person concerned, in case of a written procedure, was not, in accordance with the law of the issuing State, informed personally or via a representative, competent according to national law, of his/her right to contest the case and of the time limits for such a legal remedy’;
glede na potrdilo iz člena 4 zadevna oseba v pisnem postopku v skladu s pravom države izdajateljice ni bila obveščena osebno ali prek zastopnika, pooblaščenega v skladu z nacionalnim pravom, o pravici, da izpodbija odločbo, in o rokih za takšno pravno sredstvo“;
according to the certificate provided for in Article 4, the person did not appear in person at the trial resulting in the decision, unless the certificate states that the person, in accordance with further procedural requirements defined in the national law of the issuing State:
če glede na potrdilo iz člena 4 oseba ni bila osebno navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odločbo, razen če je v potrdilu navedeno, da je bila oseba v skladu z dodatnimi procesnimi zahtevami, določenimi v nacionalnem pravu države izdajateljice:
either was summoned in person and thereby informed of the scheduled date and place of the trial which resulted in the decision, or by other means actually received official information of the scheduled date and place of that trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he or she was aware of the scheduled trial,
osebno povabljena in tako obveščena o predvidenem datumu in kraju sojenja, ki se je zaključilo z odločbo, ali če je bila zadevna oseba dejansko kako drugače uradno obveščena o predvidenem datumu in kraju sojenja, in sicer tako, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila ta oseba seznanjena z načrtovanim sojenjem,
after being served with the decision and being expressly informed of the right to a retrial, or an appeal, in which he or she has the right to participate and which allows the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, to be re-examined, and which may lead to the original decision being reversed:
potem ko ji je bila vročena odločba in je bila izrecno obveščena o pravici do ponovnega sojenja ali pritožbe, v kateri ima pravico sodelovati, ki omogoča, da se vsebina zadeve skupaj z novimi dokazi ponovno preučijo, in ki lahko privede do spremembe prvotne odločbe:
expressly stated that he or she does not contest the decision,
izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe,
according to the certificate provided for in Article 4, the person did not appear in person, unless the certificate states that the person, having been expressly informed about the proceedings and the possibility to appear in person in a trial, expressly waived his or her right to an oral hearing and has expressly indicated that he or she does not contest the case.’;
v skladu s potrdilom iz člena 4 oseba ni bila osebno navzoča na sojenju, razen če je na potrdilu navedeno, da je oseba po tem, ko je bila izrecno obveščena o postopkih in možnosti, da je lahko osebno navzoča na sojenju, izrecno izjavila, da se odpoveduje pravici do ustne obravnave, in je izrecno navedla, da ne bo izpodbijala odločbe.“