natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If the State had allowed Combus to become bankrupt, it would probably have had a negative impact on interest rates and general loan terms for State-owned companies as regards financial institutions in both Denmark and abroad.
Če bi država dovolila, da gre podjetje Combus v stečaj, bi to verjetno negativno vplivalo na obrestne mere in splošne pogoje posojil za podjetja v državni lasti pri finančnih ustanovah na Danskem in v tujini.
In this respect, the Danish government explains that over the last few years, Denmark has privatised a number of State-owned companies, and plans further privatisations.
V tem oziru danska vlada pojasnjuje, da je v zadnjih nekaj letih Danska privatizirala več državnih podjetij in načrtuje nadaljnje privatizacije.
One of the companies converted into a public limited company with a view to privatisation after the privatisation of Combus is Post Danmark A/S [31].
Eno izmed podjetij, ki je bilo po privatizaciji podjetja Combus preoblikovano v delniško družbo z namenom privatizacije, je Post Danmark A/S [31].
The Danish State has just entered into a conditional agreement for the sale of 25 % of the shares in the company.
Danska država je ravno sklenila pogojni sporazum o prodaji 25 % delnic v tem podjetju.
The selling price for 22 % of the shares (the last 3 % will be offered to employees) which were sold to Post Invest (part of the CVC Group) is DKK 1,27 billion.
Prodajna cena za 22 % delnic (zadnji 3 % bodo na voljo zaposlenim), ki so bile prodane podjetju Post Invest (del skupine CVC Group), znaša 1,27 milijarde DKK.
Prior to the conversion into a public limited company and the partial privatisation, the company’s civil servants were bought out in 2001.
Pred preoblikovanjem v delniško družbo in delno privatizacijo so bili javni uslužbenci podjetja izplačani leta 2001.
At that time, Post Danmark had a total of approx. 30000 employees, approx. 11800 of whom were civil servants.
V tistem času je imelo podjetje Post Danmark skupno okoli 30000 zaposlenih, od tega približno 11800 javnih uslužbencev.
The civil servants were given the offer of moving to employment on a group contract basis, while retaining the right to a civil servant pension.
Slednjim je bilo ponujeno, da preidejo v zaposlitev na podlagi skupinske pogodbe in obenem obdržijo pravico do pokojnine javnih uslužbencev.
A large majority of 96 % accepted this.
Velika večina, 96 %, je to sprejela.
This meant that more than 10500 civil servants chose employment on a group contract basis in accordance with a model that meant a lump sum of DKK 50000 before tax from Post Danmark.
To pomeni, da se je več kot 10500 javnih uslužbencev odločilo za zaposlitev na podlagi skupinske pogodbe po modelu, ki jim od podjetja Post Danmark zagotavlja pavšalno plačilo 50000 DKK pred davki.
At the same time, they accepted a broader interpretation of the duties they could be transferred to.
Obenem so pristali na širšo razlago dolžnosti, ki se jim lahko dodelijo.
The other approx. 650 civil servants wanted employment on a group contract basis in accordance with a model that to all intents and purposes gave them the same terms as their civil servant status.
Okoli 650 preostalih javnih uslužbencev je želelo zaposlitev na podlagi skupinske pogodbe v skladu z modelom, ki jim v tako rekoč vseh vidikih omogoča enake pogoje kot njihov status javnega uslužbenca.
This model did not lead to any lump sums.
Ta model ni zajemal nobenih pavšalnih plačil.
A smaller percentage of the civil servants, approx. 480, wished to retain their civil servant status with the State.
Manjši odstotek javnih uslužbencev, približno 480, je želel ohraniti svoj status državnih javnih uslužbencev.
When Post Danmark A/S was established, they were therefore seconded from the State to the public limited company.
Ko je bila ustanovljeno podjetje Post Danmark A/S, jih je država premestila iz državne v delniško družbo.
In connection with the establishment of Post Danmark A/S, an opening balance of approx. DKK 1,7 billion (DKK 1,190 billion after tax) was set aside for an actuarially calculated lump sum payment to the State to bring down future annual pension contributions from 20 % to 12 % of salaries for former and remaining civil servants for whom the company still had to pay pension contributions, etc. The amount was paid in 2002.
V povezavi z ustanovitvijo podjetja Post Danmark A/S je bilo v začetni bilanci okoli 1,7 milijarde DKK (1,190 milijarde DKK po davkih) namenjenih za aktuarsko izračunano pavšalno plačilo državi, da bi znižali prihodnje letne pokojninske prispevke z 20 % na 12 % plače za nekdanje in preostale javne uslužbence, za katere je podjetje še moralo plačati pokojninske prispevke itd. Znesek je bil plačan leta 2002.
Equality of treatment regarding pensions was thereby achieved between former civil servants and those employed on a group contract basis.
Enaka obravnava, kar zadeva pokojnine, je bila tako dosežena za javne uslužbence in tiste, ki so bili zaposleni na podlagi skupinske pogodbe.
In the Danish Government’s opinion, its negotiating position with the civil servants in Post Danmark would have been extremely difficult, and the outcome of the negotiations much more costly, if the Danish State had allowed Combus to go bankrupt, thereby leading to massive unemployment of those civil servants who had given up their civil servants status prior to the privatisation of Combus.
Po mnenju danske vlade bi bil njen pogajalski položaj pri javnih uslužbencih v podjetju Post Danmark izjemno težak, izid pogajanj pa bistveno dražji, če bi danska država omogočila podjetju Combus stečaj, ki bi privedel do masovne nezaposlenosti tistih javnih uslužbencev, ki so se odrekli svojemu statusu javnega uslužbenca pred privatizacijo podjetja Combus.
In this context, the Danish government points out that employment as a civil servant means that the individual civil servant basically has a guarantee of employment until pension age and a subsequent lifelong pension.
V tem okviru danska vlada poudarja, da zaposlitev v funkciji javnega uslužbenca pomeni, da ima posamezen javni uslužbenec pravzaprav zajamčeno zaposlitev do upokojitvene starosti in zatem dosmrtno pokojnino.
These rights are surrendered in transferring to employment on a group contract basis.
Tem pravicam se pri prehodu v zaposlitev na podlagi skupinske pogodbe odreče.
When State companies are placed under private control, civil servants may regard it as an unjustified transfer and thereby request redundancy.
Ko državna podjetja pridejo pod zasebni nadzor, se javnim uslužbencem to lahko zdi neupravičen prenos in zato zahtevajo odpoved delovnega razmerja.
This triggers off a particularly large amount of compensation to the individual civil servant.
To sproži posebno veliko odpravnino za posameznega javnega uslužbenca.
This makes it extremely important for Denmark, from a financial point of view, that an agreement can be reached with any civil servants on a transfer to employment on a group contract basis in return for a reasonable amount of compensation prior to privatisation of State-owned companies.
Zato je za Dansko s finančnega stališča izjemno pomembno, da se pred privatizacijo državnih podjetij z vsemi javnimi uslužbenci sklene sporazum o prehodu v zaposlitev na podlagi skupinske pogodbe v zameno za razumen znesek odškodnine.
The Danish government considers that the amount of compensation demanded by civil servants is largely dependent on whether they feel reasonable job security after the transfer to employment on a group contract basis.
Danska vlada meni, da je višina odškodnine, ki jo zahtevajo javni uslužbenci, v veliki meri odvisna od tega, ali se jim zdi njihova zaposlitev razmeroma varna po prehodu v zaposlitev na podlagi skupinske pogodbe.
The effect of the State leaving the former civil servants in the lurch by letting the company become bankrupt, shortly after concluding agreements with the civil servants on a transfer to employment on a group contract basis, would most likely be that all civil servants in a similar situation in the future would demand significantly higher compensation before surrendering their status.
Če bi država nekdanje javne uslužbence pustila na cedilu in dopustila, da gre podjetje v stečaj kmalu zatem, ko bi z javnimi uslužbenci sklenila pogodbe o prehodu v zaposlitev na podlagi skupinske pogodbe, bi to najverjetneje povzročilo, da bi vsi javni uslužbenci v podobni situaciji v prihodnosti zahtevali bistveno višjo odškodnino, preden bi se odrekli svojemu statusu.
In this context, the Danish government also mentions the example of the sale of certain divisions of Banedanmark [32].
V tem okviru danska vlada omenja tudi primer prodaje določenih sektorjev podjetja Banedanmark [32].
Banedanmark’s Advisory Division was sold to WS Atkins International Limited on 1 July 2001 [33].
Svetovalni sektor podjetja Banedanmark je bil prodan podjetju WS Atkins International Limited 1. julija 2001 [33].
The cash selling price was DKK 70 million.
Gotovinska prodajna cena je znašala 70 milijonov DKK.
In addition to the selling price, the State acquired a cash payment of approx. DKK 35 million.
Poleg prodajne cene je država pridobila tudi plačilo v višini približno 35 milijonov DKK.
Banedanmark’s advisory division employed 326 employees, 66 of whom were civil servants.
Svetovalni sektor podjetja Banedanmark je zaposloval 326 delavcev, od tega 66 javnih uslužbencev.
In the transfer of the Advisory Division, the civil servants basically remained civil servants in Banedanmark, as, according to their status as civil servants, they had no obligation to transfer to the new employer.
Pri prenosu svetovalnega sektorja so javni uslužbenci v osnovi ostali javni uslužbenci v podjetju Banedanmark, saj zaradi statusa javnih uslužbencev niso bili obvezani preiti k novemu delodajalcu.
There was, however, the option of the individual civil servants voluntarily being seconded to the buyer.
Obstajala pa je možnost, da se posamezne javne uslužbence prostovoljno premesti h kupcu.
Civil servants who wanted to transfer to employment on a group contract basis with the buyer were offered 15 months’ salary from Banedanmark at the time of severance.
Javnim uslužbencem, ki so želeli prestopiti v delovno razmerje na podlagi skupinske pogodbe s kupcem, je ob prekinitvi delovnega razmerja podjetje Banedanmark ponudilo znesek v višini 15 mesečnih plač.
The offer to buy them out applied for up to a year after the date of transfer.
Ponudba za njihovo izplačilo je veljala še eno leto po datumu prestopa.
The cost of buying out the civil servants, which was to be defrayed from the proceeds of the sale, could have come to DKK 23 million if all the civil servants had transferred to employment on a group contract basis.
Stroški izplačila javnih uslužbencev, ki naj bi se pokrili iz izkupička od prodaje, bi lahko znašali 23 milijonov DKK, če bi se vsi javni uslužbenci odločili za delovno razmerje na podlagi skupinske pogodbe.
At the moment, Denmark is aiming at the total sale of Banedanmark’s Civil Engineering Division [34].
Trenutno podjetje Denmark namerava prodati celoten gradbeni sektor podjetja Banedanmark [34].
The civil engineering division had a turnover of approx. DKK 1,3 million in 2004 and employed about 1470 staff at the end of the year, 740 of whom were civil servants.
Ta sektor je leta 2004 ustvaril promet v višini okoli 1,3 milijona DKK in zaposloval konec leta približno 1470 delavcev, od tega 740 javnih uslužbencev.
In the event of a sale of the civil engineering division, the civil servants would not be obliged to transfer to employment with the buyer and a solution to the civil servant issue will therefore have to be found, as with other privatisations.
V primeru prodaje gradbenega sektorja javni uslužbenci ne bi bili obvezani prestopiti v delovno razmerje s kupcem, zato bo kot pri drugih privatizacijah treba najti rešitev za javne uslužbence.
Another option for privatisation under consideration is the sale of the Danish railway company DSB.
Druga možnost za zadevno privatizacijo je prodaja danskega železniškega podjetja DSB.
DSB is an independent public company that operates passenger transport as a public service after negotiations on the basis of a transport contract entered into with the Danish State.
DSB je neodvisno javno podjetje, ki opravlja dejavnost potniškega prevoza kot javno službo po pogajanjih na podlagi pogodbe o prevozu, sklenjene z dansko državo.
Around half of the company’s 8500 employees are civil servants.
Okoli polovica od njegovih 8500 zaposlenih je javnih uslužbencev.
The privatisation of DSB would mean the transfer to group contract conditions for all these civil servants.
Privatizacija podjetja DSB bi pomenila, da bodo vsi ti javni uslužbenci prestopili v pogoje skupinske pogodbe.
Denmark considers that, if the State had allowed Combus to become bankrupt after having compensated the civil servants for transferring to group contracts, it would have been impossible to persuade civil servants to go over to group contracts instead of civil service employment in the event of future privatisations.
Po mnenju Danske bi v primeru, da bi država dopustila, da gre podjetje Combus v stečaj zatem, ko je izplačalo nadomestilo javnim uslužbencem za prestop k skupinskim pogodbam, bilo javne uslužbence v primeru prihodnjih privatizacij nemogoče prepričati, da prestopijo k skupinskim pogodbam, namesto zaposlitvi v javni službi.
The State would thereby be prevented from, or in any case have significantly reduced options for privatising State-owned companies with civil servants.
Tako bi bile državi onemogočene ali vsaj bistveno zmanjšane možnosti privatizacije državnih podjetij z javnimi uslužbenci.
Denmark considers that at best, bankruptcy of Combus would have damaged the State’s credibility and the civil servants would, as a result, have demanded better terms in the form of significantly higher amounts of compensation to transfer to employment on a group contract basis and renounce their civil servant rights.
Danska meni, da bi v najboljšem primeru stečaj podjetja Combus škodil verodostojnosti države in da bi zato javni uslužbenci zahtevali boljše pogoje v obliki bistveno višjih zneskov nadomestila za prestop v zaposlitev na podlagi skupinske pogodbe in odrek pravicam, ki jih imajo kot javni uslužbenci.
Using Post Danmark as an example, a doubling of the amount of compensation to individual civil servants in relation to that company alone would have meant a further outlay for the Danish State of DKK 500 million.
Primer podjetja Post Danmark kaže, da bi podvojitev zneska nadomestila posameznim javnim uslužbencem že samo v primeru navedenega podjetja pomenila dodatnih 500 milijonov DKK izdatkov za dansko državo.
The Danish government also points out in this context that it had already allowed a company, converted to a public limited company a short time before, to become bankrupt, namely Statens Konfektion, which was converted into a public limited company in 1992.
V tem okviru danska vlada tudi izpostavlja, da je že dovolila podjetju, ki je bilo malo pred tem preoblikovano v delniško družbo, da gre v stečaj, in sicer gre za podjetje Statens Konfektion, ki je postalo delniška družba leta 1992.
Prior to the conversion, all the civil servants were offered employment on a group contract basis in return for financial compensation.
Pred to spremembo je bila vsem javnim uslužbencem ponujena možnost zaposlitve na podlagi skupinske pogodbe v zameno za finančno nadomestilo.
When the Armed Forces, which were the company’s biggest customer, subsequently decided to invite tenders for their supply contracts, the company’s business base disappeared.
Ko se je vojska, ki je bila največja stranka podjetja, pozneje odločila, da bo pogodbe o dobavi oddajala prek razpisov, je poslovna baza podjetja izginila.
The company therefore went bankrupt in 1992, which led to harsh criticism of the Danish government including by those now employed on a group contract basis.
Podjetje je tako leta 1992 šlo v stečaj, zaradi česar je bila danska vlada deležna strogih kritik, tudi s strani tistih, ki so zdaj zaposleni na podlagi skupinske pogodbe.
The Danish government considers that in the light of experiences from Statens Konfektion, it had no choice in connection with the sale of Combus, as yet another bankruptcy would have been devastating for negotiations with civil servants in connection with preparations for future privatisations.
Danska vlada meni, da glede na izkušnje s podjetjem Statens Konfektion ni imela nobene možnosti pri prodaji podjetja Combus, saj bi še en stečaj pogubno vplival na pogajanja z javnimi uslužbenci glede priprav na prihodnje privatizacije.
The Danish government furthermore explains that if it is not possible to transfer civil servants to a group contract in connection with privatisation, making the civil servants redundant is often the only real alternative because it would not be possible to offer them other work within their areas of employment which they would be obliged to accept.
Danska vlada nadalje pojasnjuje, da če pri privatizaciji javnih uslužbencev ni mogoče premestiti v zaposlitev na podlagi skupinske pogodbe, je pogosto edina še realna možnost njihova odpustitev, saj jim ni mogoče ponuditi drugega dela v okviru področja zaposlitve, ki bi ga morali sprejeti.
It has been estimated in connection with the sale of shares in Post Danmark that it costs DKK 2 million to make a civil servant redundant.
V zvezi s prodajo delnic podjetja Post Danmark je bilo ocenjeno, da stroški odpustitve javnega uslužbenca znašajo 2 milijona DKK.
Such expenditure per civil servant for future privatisations would be devastating for the State’s privatisation plans and the expenditure on this would, to a great extent, undermine the financial benefits of privatisation.
Takšni izdatki na posameznega javnega uslužbenca bi bili v prihodnjih privatizacijah pogubni za državne privatizacijske načrte, tovrstni izdatki pa bi v veliki meri izničili finančne koristi privatizacije.
It is clear that such expenditure would far exceed the financial burden to the State of the capital injections into Combus.
Jasno je, da bi bili ti izdatki bistveno večji od finančnega bremena države, ki ga predstavljajo kapitalski vložki v podjetje Combus.
Beyond the issue of changing the status of civil servants in order to prepare companies for privatisation, Denmark considers that a bankruptcy of Combus would have damaged the State’s reputation as a responsible investor and would have had a negative influence on all the State’s financial activities and future investment options.
Če odmislimo spremembo statusa javnih uslužbencev, da bi pripravili podjetja za privatizacijo, Danska meni, da bi stečaj podjetja Combus škodil ugledu države kot odgovorne vlagateljice in bi imel negativen vpliv na vse finančne dejavnosti države in njene prihodnje možnosti naložb.
In particular, the Danish government considers that a bankruptcy would have had a negative effect on interest rates and general loan terms for other State-owned companies.
Danska vlada je predvsem mnenja, da bi stečaj negativno vplival na obrestne mere in splošne pogoje posojil za druga podjetja v državni lasti.
In conclusion, it is the Danish government’s view that the State — particularly in the light of the special problem that manifested itself in relation to the civil servants — would not have been acting as a responsible and loyal investor if it had chosen to allow Combus to become bankrupt.
Stališče danske vlade torej je, da država – zlasti glede na posebno težavo, ki se je pokazala v zvezi z javnimi uslužbenci – ne bi delovala kot odgovorna in zvesta vlagateljica, če bi se bila odločila, da lahko gre podjetje Combus v stečaj.
With respect to recital 88 of the decision to initiate the procedure, where the Commission stated that the ECJ only accepts consideration for the State’s reputation as grounds for an injection of capital if there is a prospect of the company becoming profitable enough to convince a private investor in the same situation to assume the risk at the time of carrying it out, the Danish government observes that Arriva actually assumed the risk for the undertaking when the company purchased Combus.
Ob upoštevanju uvodne izjave 88 odločitve o sprožitvi postopka, kjer je Komisija navedla, da Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti sprejme pomisleke glede ugleda države kot razlog za kapitalski vložek, samo če obstaja možnost, da bo podjetje postalo dovolj donosno, da se zasebnega vlagatelja v enakem položaju prepriča, da prevzame tveganje v času izvedbe kapitalskega vložka, danska vlada ugotavlja, da je podjetje Arriva dejansko prevzelo tveganje, ko je kupilo podjetje Combus.
COMPATIBILITY WITH THE 1999 RESTRUCTURING GUIDELINES
ZDRUŽLJIVOST S SMERNICAMI O PRESTRUKTURIRANJU IZ LETA 1999
The Danish government considers that the contested measures fulfil all conditions set out in the 1999 restructuring guidelines.
Po mnenju danske vlade izpodbijani ukrepi izpolnjujejo vse pogoje, določene v smernicah o prestrukturiranju iz leta 1999.
With respect to the points where the Commission had raised doubts in its decision to initiate the formal proceedings, the Danish government presents the following observations:
Kar zadeva točke, v katerih je Komisija izrazila dvom v svoji odločitvi o sprožitvi formalnega postopka, danska vlada predstavlja naslednje ugotovitve:
One time, last time aid
Načelo enkratnosti pomoči
As regards the question of whether the aid measures in 1999 and 2001 respectively constitute one or two separate measures, the Danish government asserts that the measures were connected so closely chronologically and in purpose that they should be regarded as one aid measure.
Glede vprašanja, ali ukrepa pomoči v letih 1999 in 2001 pomenita enega ali dva ločena ukrepa, danska vlada trdi, da sta si časovno in po namenu tako blizu, da bi ju morali šteti kot en ukrep pomoči.
As a result of this, the 1999 restructuring guidelines should apply to this aid measure.
Zato morajo za ta ukrep pomoči veljati smernice o prestrukturiranju iz leta 1999.
Denmark justifies this point of view with several arguments.
Danska to stališče utemeljuje z več trditvami.
The CFI judgement does not annul point 3.4.6 of the initial decision
Sodba SPS ne razveljavlja točke 3.4.6 prvotne odločbe
The Danish government notes in connection with this that the Commission stated the following in point 3.4.6 of the initial decision with regard to the question of ‘one time, last time’ aid: ‘In the case of Combus, the chronology and the purpose of the capital injections made by the Danish government, as well as Combus’ situation also suggest that the two measures should be treated as part of a continuing restructuring process.
V zvezi s tem danska vlada navaja, da je Komisija v točki 3.4.6 prvotne odločbe glede vprašanja „načela enkratnosti“ pomoči napisala naslednje:
In particular, the first injection of capital in 1999 served to reduce the debts of the company that had resulted from the heavy losses in previous years. There had also been efforts to modify drivers’ contracts. The clear intention was the privatisation of the company, which forms the final part of the restructuring strategy.’
„V primeru podjetja Combus časovno zaporedje in namen kapitalskih vložkov, ki jih je izvedla danska vlada, ter položaj podjetja Combus kažejo, da bi bilo treba ta dva ukrepa obravnavati kot del neprekinjenega postopka prestrukturiranja. Zlasti prvi kapitalski vložek leta 1999 je bil namenjen zmanjšanju dolgov podjetja, ki so bili posledica velikih izgub v preteklih letih. Prizadevali so si tudi spremeniti pogodbe voznikov. Očiten namen je bila privatizacija podjetja, ki je končen del strategije prestrukturiranja.“
The Commission maintained this opinion in paragraphs 50 and 54 of the defence it submitted to the CFI.
Komisija je vztrajala pri tem mnenju v odstavkih 50 in 54 zagovora, ki ga je predložila SPS.
In this connection, the Danish government would point out that the Commission’s assessment of the measures as being ‘one time, last time’ does not appear to have given rise to criticism in the Combus judgment [35].
V zvezi s tem želi danska vlada poudariti, da s tem, ko je Komisija ukrepe ocenila kot skladne z „načelom enkratnosti pomoči“, očitno ni povzročila kritik v sodbi Combus [35].