natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, the examination of the dossiers is still ongoing and it will not be possible to complete the evaluation within the timeframe provided for in Directive 91/414/EEC, read in conjunction with Commission Decision 2008/724/EC [6] (pinoxaden).
Zato pregled dokumentacij še traja in ocenjevanja ne bo mogoče zaključiti v roku, določenem v Direktivi 91/414/EGS, ki se razlaga skupaj z Odločbo Komisije 2008/724/ES [6] (pinoksaden).
As the evaluation so far has not identified any reason for immediate concern, Member States should be given the possibility of prolonging provisional authorisations granted for plant protection products containing the active substances concerned for a period of 24 months in accordance with the provisions of Article 8 of Directive 91/414/EEC so as to enable the examination of the dossiers to continue.
Ker dosedanja ocena še ni razkrila razlogov za skrb, je treba državam članicam zagotoviti možnost podaljšanja začasnih registracij za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo zadevne aktivne snovi, za 24 mesecev, v skladu z določbami člena 8 Direktive 91/414/EGS, in tako omogočiti nadaljnje pregledovanje dokumentacij.
It is expected that the evaluation and decision-making process with respect to a decision on a possible inclusion in Annex I to that Directive for amisulbrom, chlorantraniliprole, meptyldinocap and pinoxaden will have been completed within 24 months.
Pričakuje se, da bosta ocena in postopek odločanja o morebitni vključitvi amisulbroma, klorantraniliprola, meptildinokapa in pinoksadena v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi zaključena v 24 mesecih.
Member States may extend provisional authorisations for plant protection products containing amisulbrom, chlorantraniliprole, meptyldinocap or pinoxaden for a period ending on 30 June 2012 at the latest.
Države članice lahko podaljšajo začasne registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo aktivne snovi amisulbrom, klorantraniliprol, meptildinokap ali pinoksaden, najpozneje do 30. junija 2012.
This Decision shall expire on 30 June 2012.
Ta sklep preneha veljati 30. junija 2012.
OJ L 274, 18.10.2007, p. 15.
UL L 274, 18.10.2007, str. 15.
OJ L 213, 15.8.2007, p. 29.
UL L 213, 15.8.2007, str. 29.
OJ L 245, 13.9.2008, p. 15.
UL L 245, 13.9.2008, str. 15.
of 25 June 2010
z dne 25. junija 2010
amending Decision 2008/855/EC as regards animal health control measures relating to classical swine fever in feral pigs
o spremembi Odločbe 2008/855/ES glede nadzornih ukrepov za zdravje živali v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo pri divjih prašičih
(notified under document C(2010) 4170)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 4170)
Commission Decision 2008/855/EC of 3 November 2008 concerning animal health control measures relating to classical swine fever in certain Member States [3] lays down certain control measures in relation to classical swine fever in the Member States or regions thereof set out in the Annex to that Decision.
Odločba Komisije 2008/855/ES z dne 3. novembra 2008 glede nadzornih ukrepov v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo v nekaterih državah članicah [3] določa nekatere nadzorne ukrepe za zdravje živali v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo v državah članicah ali njihovih regijah, določenih v Prilogi k navedeni odločbi.
The Annex to Decision 2008/855/EC comprises three parts, depending on the epidemiological situation in the areas listed therein.
Priloga k Odločbi 2008/855/ES obsega tri dele, odvisno od epidemiološkega stanja območij, ki so v njej navedena.
Parts I and II of that Annex list the areas in the Member States where the epidemiological situation with regard to feral pigs is considered to be most favourable.
V delih I in II navedene priloge so navedena območja v državah članicah, kjer se epidemiološko stanje v zvezi z divjimi prašiči šteje kot najugodnejše.
Although feral pigs are included in the scope of Decision 2008/855/EC, the control measures provided for in that Decision are primarily targeting pigs from holdings and products derived therefrom.
Čeprav so divji prašiči vključeni v področje delovanja Odločbe 2008/855/ES, so nadzorni ukrepi iz navedene odločbe prvenstveno usmerjeni k prašičem z gospodarstev in proizvodom, ki iz njih izvirajo.
Commission Decision 2002/106/EC [4] sets out the diagnostic procedures, sampling methods and criteria for evaluation of the laboratory tests for the confirmation of classical swine fever.
Odločba Komisije 2002/106/ES [4] določa diagnostične postopke, metode vzorčenja in merila za ocenjevanje rezultatov laboratorijskih preiskav za potrjevanje klasične prašičje kuge.
In order to better control the spread of classical swine fever, it is appropriate to provide for certain animal health control measures targeting the feral pig population affected by that disease.
Za boljši nadzor razširjenosti prašičje kuge je primerno zagotoviti nekatere nadzorne ukrepe za zdravje živali, usmerjene na populacijo divjih prašičev, okuženo z navedeno boleznijo.
In particular, a prohibition on the dispatch from the areas listed in the Annex to Decision 2008/855/EC of consignments of live feral pigs and of fresh meat, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing such meat should be laid down.
Zlasti je treba določiti prepoved za odpošiljanje pošiljk z območij iz Priloge k Odločbi 2008/855/ES živih divjih prašičev in svežega mesa, mesnih pripravkov in mesnih izdelkov, ki so sestavljeni iz takšnega mesa ali ga vsebujejo.
It is however appropriate to permit that consignments of fresh meat of feral pigs, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing such meat be dispatched from those areas to other areas not listed in the Annex to Decision 2008/855/EC, provided that virological tests are performed in accordance with Decision 2002/106/EC, that the results of those tests are negative and that the competent veterinary authority of the place of destination gives its prior approval.
Vendar je primerno dovoliti, da se pošiljke svežega mesa divjih prašičev, mesnih pripravkov in mesnih izdelkov, ki so sestavljeni iz takšnega mesa ali ga vsebujejo, odpošljejo z navedenih območij na druga območja, ki niso navedena v Prilogi k Odločbi 2008/855/ES, pod pogojem, da so virološki testi opravljeni v skladu z Odločbo 2002/106/ES, da so rezultati navedenih testov negativni in da pristojni veterinarski organ namembnega kraja izda predhodno odobritev.
The following Article 8b is inserted in Decision 2008/855/EC:
V Odločbo 2008/855/ES se vstavi naslednji člen 8b:
‘Article 8b
„Člen 8b
Measures relating to live feral pigs, fresh meat, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing meat from feral pigs
Ukrepi v zvezi z živimi divjimi prašiči, svežim mesom, mesnimi pripravki in mesnimi izdelki, ki so sestavljeni iz mesa divjih prašičev ali ga vsebujejo
The Member States concerned with areas listed in the Annex shall ensure that:
Zadevne države članice z območji iz Priloge zagotovijo, da:
no live feral pigs from the areas listed in the Annex are dispatched to other Member States or to other areas in the territory of the same Member State;
se nobeni živi divji prašiči z območij iz Priloge ne odpošljejo v druge države članice ali na druga območja ozemlja iste države članice;
no consignments of fresh meat of feral pigs, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing such meat from the areas listed in the Annex are dispatched to other Member States or to other areas in the territory of the same Member State.
se nobene pošiljke svežega mesa divjih prašičev, mesnih pripravkov in mesnih izdelkov, ki so sestavljeni iz takšnega mesa ali ga vsebujejo, z območij iz Priloge ne odpošljejo v druge države članice ali na druga območja ozemlja iste države članice.
By way of derogation from paragraph 1(b), the Member States concerned with areas listed in Parts I and II of the Annex may authorise the dispatch of consignments of fresh meat of feral pigs, meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing such meat from those areas to other areas not listed in the Annex, provided that:
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1(b) lahko zadevne države članice z območji iz delov I in II Priloge dovolijo odpošiljanje pošiljk svežega mesa divjih prašičev, mesnih pripravkov in mesnih izdelkov, ki so sestavljeni iz takšnega mesa ali ga vsebujejo, z navedenih območij na druga območja, ki niso navedena v Prilogi, pod pogojem, da:
the pigs have been tested with negative results for classical swine fever according to any of the diagnostic procedures described in Part A(1), Part B or Part C of Chapter VI of the Annex to Decision 2002/106/EC;
je bil na prašičih opravljen test z negativnimi izvidi na klasično prašičjo kugo v skladu s kakršnimi koli diagnostičnimi postopki, opisanimi v delu A(1), delu B ali delu C poglavja VI Priloge k Odločbi 2002/106/ES;
the competent authority of the place of destination gives its prior approval.’
pristojni organ namembnega kraja izda predhodno odobritev.“
Done at Brussels, 25 June 2010.
V Bruslju, 25. junija 2010
concerning the non-inclusion of trifluralin in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC
o nevključitvi trifluralina v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS
(notified under document C(2010) 4199)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 4199)
By Commission Decision 2007/629/EC [2] it was decided not to include the active substance trifluralin in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Z Odločbo Komisije 2007/629/ES [2] je bilo odločeno, da se aktivna snov trifluralin ne vključi v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/ES.
That Decision was taken within the framework of the second stage of the programme of work provided for in Commission Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 [3] and (EC) No 703/2001 [4] which lay down the detailed rules for the implementation of the second stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and which establish a list of active substances to be assessed, with a view to their possible inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Navedena odločba je bila sprejeta v okviru druge faze delovnega programa, določenega v uredbah Komisije (ES) št. 451/2000 [3] in (ES) št. 703/2001 [4], ki določata podrobna pravila za izvajanje druge faze delovnega programa iz člena 8(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS in seznam aktivnih snovi, ki jih je treba oceniti zaradi njihove možne vključitve v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
The original notifier submitted a new application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I [5].
Prvotni prijavitelj je vložil nov zahtevek v skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 33/2008 z dne 17. januarja 2008 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS glede rednega in pospešenega postopka za oceno aktivnih snovi, ki so bile del delovnega programa iz člena 8(2) navedene direktive, vendar niso bile vključene v Prilogo I [5].
It requested the application of the accelerated procedure pursuant to Articles 13 to 19 of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 and submitted an updated dossier.
Zahteval je uporabo pospešenega postopka v skladu s členoma 13 in 19 Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008 in predložil posodobljeno dokumentacijo.
The application was submitted to Greece, which had been designated rapporteur Member State by Regulation (EC) No 451/2000.
Zahtevek je bil predložen Grčiji, ki je bila z Uredbo (ES) št. 451/2000 določena kot država poročevalka.
That application complies with the substantive and procedural requirements of Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 and was submitted within the time period provided for in the second sentence of Article 13 of that Regulation.
Navedeni zahtevek izpolnjuje vsebinske in postopkovne zahteve iz člena 15 Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008 in je bil predložen v roku iz drugega stavka člena 13 navedene uredbe.
Greece evaluated the new information and data submitted by the notifier and prepared an additional report on 7 January 2009.
Grčija je ocenila nove informacije in podatke, ki jih je predložil prijavitelj, in 7. januarja 2009 predložila dodatno poročilo.
The additional report was peer reviewed by the Member States and the European Food Safety Authority, hereinafter EFSA, and presented to the Commission on 14 July 2009 in the format of the EFSA Scientific Report for trifluralin [6].
Dodatno poročilo so pregledali strokovnjaki držav članic in Evropske agencije za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EFSA) ter ga 14. julija 2009 predstavili Komisiji v obliki znanstvenega poročila EFSA o trifluralinu [6].
This report was reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 11 May 2010 in the format of the Commission review report for trifluralin.
To poročilo so države članice in Komisija pregledale v okviru Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter končno različico pripravile 11. maja 2010 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu glede trifluralina.
The new assessment by the rapporteur Member State and the new conclusion by the EFSA concentrated on the concerns that lead to the non-inclusion, which were due to the high risk for aquatic organisms, especially fish, the toxicity of metabolites to sediment dwelling organisms, the consumer exposure for non-cereal applications, the high persistence in soil, the high potential for bioaccumulation, and the potential for long range transport via air.
V novi oceni države članice poročevalke in sklepih EFSA so bili analizirani predvsem razlogi za nevključitev trifluralina, kot so visoko tveganje za vodne organizme, zlasti ribe, toksičnost metabolitov za organizme, ki živijo v usedlinah, izpostavljenost potrošnikov pri uporabi na rastlinah razen žita, dolga prisotnost v zemlji, visoka možnost kopičenja v organizmih in možnost prenosa po zraku na dolge razdalje.
New data and information were submitted by the notifier in the updated dossier, in particular as regards the aquatic risk assessment, especially fish, the toxicity of metabolites to sediment dwelling organisms, the high persistence in soil and the high potential for bioaccumulation.
Prijavitelj je v posodobljeni dokumentaciji predložil nove podatke in informacije, predvsem glede ocene vodnega tveganja, zlasti za ribe, toksičnosti metabolitov za organizme, ki živijo v usedlinah, dolge prisotnosti v zemlji in visoke možnosti za kopičenje v organizmih.
In order to reduce the risk to consumers, the notifier, in the context of the resubmission, only supported applications on oil seed rape.
Za zmanjšanje tveganja za potrošnike je prijavitelj v novi vlogi predlagal le uporabo na semenih oljne ogrščice.
As regards the potential for long range transport via air, the submitted data simply reproduced a monitoring report which already figured in the original dossier.
Glede možnosti prenosa po zraku na dolge razdalje so bili predloženi podatki iz poročila o spremljanju, ki so bili že v prvotni dokumentaciji.
A new assessment was performed, as included in the additional report and in the EFSA Scientific Report for trifluralin.
Opravljena je bila nova ocena, ki je bila vključena v dodatno poročilo in znanstveno poročilo EFSA o trifluralinu.
However, the additional data and information provided by the notifier did not permit to eliminate all the specific concerns that led to the non-inclusion.
Vendar dodatni podatki in informacije, ki jih je predložil prijavitelj, ne omogočajo odprave vseh posebnih pomislekov, ki so bili razlog za nevključitev.
In particular, the concern on potential high risk for aquatic organisms, especially fish, could not be solved due to shortcomings in the newly submitted studies.
Zlasti pomislek glede morebitnega visokega tveganja za vodne organizme, zlasti ribe, ni bil odpravljen zaradi pomanjkljivosti v nanovo predloženih študijah.
As a consequence, the surface water risk assessment could not be finalised.
Zato ni bilo mogoče dokončati ocene tveganja za površinske vode.
Furthermore, the potential for long range transport via air has not been adequately elucidated by the produced information which was of an obsolete nature.
Poleg tega možnost prenosa po zraku na dolge razdalje ni bila ustrezno preučena zaradi zastarelosti predloženih informacij.
The Commission invited the notifier to submit its comments on the results of the peer review.
Komisija je prijavitelja pozvala, naj predloži pripombe k rezultatom pregleda strokovnjakov.
Furthermore, in accordance with Article 21(1) to Regulation (EC) No 33/2008, the Commission invited the notifier to submit comments on the draft review report and in particular on the remaining concerns for the aquatic risk and the potential for long range transport.
Poleg tega je Komisija prijavitelja v skladu s členom 21(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008 pozvala, naj predloži pripombe k osnutku poročila o pregledu, zlasti glede neodpravljenih pomislekov za vodno tveganje in možnosti za prenos na dolge razdalje.
The notifier submitted its comments, which have been carefully examined.
Prijavitelj je predložil pripombe, ki so bile natančno pregledane.
However, despite the arguments put forward by the notifier, the concerns identified could not be eliminated, and assessments made on the basis of the information submitted and evaluated during the EFSA expert meetings have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing trifluralin satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Toda kljub argumentom, ki jih je prijavitelj predložil, se navedenih pomislekov ni dalo odpraviti, po ocenah na podlagi predloženih informacij, preučenih na srečanjih strokovnjakov EFSA, pa ne kaže pričakovati, da bi lahko fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo trifluralin, pod predvidenimi pogoji uporabe na splošno izpolnjevala zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
Decision 2007/629/EC should be repealed.
Odločbo 2007/629/ES je treba razveljaviti.
This Decision does not prejudice the submission of a further application for trifluralin pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008.
Ta sklep ne vpliva na ponovno predložitev zahtevka za trifluralin v skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS in poglavjem II Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008.
Trifluralin shall not be included as active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Trifluralin se ne vključi kot aktivna snov v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Decision 2007/629/EC is repealed.
Odločba 2007/629/ES se razveljavi.
OJ L 255, 29.9.2007, p. 42.
UL L 255, 29.9.2007, str. 42.
EFSA Scientific Report (2009) 327 — Conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance trifluralin (re-issued on 14 July 2009).
Znanstveno poročilo EFSA (2009) 327 – Sklep o strokovnem pregledu ocene nevarnosti pesticidov z aktivno snovjo trifluralin (ponovno izdano 14. julija 2009).
(notified under document C(2010) 4225)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 4225)
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in March 1998 Spain received an application from BASF SE for the inclusion of the active substance profoxydim in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
V skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS je Španija marca 1998 od podjetja BASF SE prejela zahtevek za vključitev aktivne snovi profoksidim v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Confirmation of the completeness of the dossier was necessary in order to allow it to be examined in detail and to allow Member States the possibility of granting provisional authorisations, for periods of up to 3 years, for plant protection products containing the active substance concerned, while complying with the conditions laid down in Article 8(1) of Directive 91/414/EEC and, in particular, the condition relating to the detailed assessment of the active substance and the plant protection products in the light of the requirements laid down by that Directive.
Potrditev popolnosti dokumentacije je bila potrebna zato, da se omogoči njen podroben pregled in da se državam članicam, ob upoštevanju pogojev iz člena 8(1) Direktive 91/414/EGS in zlasti pogoja v zvezi s podrobno oceno aktivne snovi in fitofarmacevtskega sredstva glede na zahteve iz navedene direktive, zagotovi možnost izdaje začasnih registracij za največ tri leta za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo zadevno aktivno snov.
For this active substance, the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed, in accordance with the provisions of Article 6(2) and (4) of Directive 91/414/EEC, for the uses proposed by the applicant.
V skladu z določbami člena 6(2) in (4) Direktive 91/414/EGS so bili za uporabe, ki jih je predlagal vlagatelj, ocenjeni vplivi te aktivne snovi na zdravje ljudi in na okolje.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment report to the Commission on 28 March 2001.
Država članica poročevalka je Komisiji 28. marca 2001 predložila osnutek poročila o oceni.
Therefore, the examination of the dossier is still ongoing and it will not be possible to complete the evaluation within the timeframe provided for in Directive 91/414/EEC, read in conjunction with Commission Decision 2008/564/EC [3].
Zato pregled dokumentacije še traja in ocenjevanja ne bo mogoče zaključiti v roku, iz Direktive 91/414/EGS, ki se razlaga skupaj z Odločbo Komisije 2008/564/ES [3].
It is expected that the evaluation and decision-making process with respect to a decision on a possible inclusion in Annex I to that Directive for profoxydim will have been completed within 24 months.
Pričakuje se, da bo postopek ocenjevanja in odločanja o morebitni vključitvi profoksidima v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi zaključen v 24 mesecih.
Member States may extend provisional authorisations for plant protection products containing profoxydim for a period ending on 30 June 2012 at the latest.
Države članice lahko podaljšajo začasne registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo profoksidim, za obdobje, ki se zaključi najpozneje do 30. junija 2012.
OJ L 181, 10.7.2008, p. 47.
UL L 181, 10.7.2008, str. 47.
on the State aid C 39/08 (ex N 148/08) planned by Romania for training by Ford Craiova
o državni pomoči C 39/08 (ex N 148/08), ki jo namerava Romunija izvajati za usposabljanje v družbi Ford Craiova
(notified under document C(2009) 9350)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 9350)
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 108(2) Pogodbe,
Romania notified to the Commission by letter of 1 April 2008 an ad hoc individual training aid for the amount of EUR 57 million in favour of car producer Ford Romania SA, located in Craiova.
Romunija je z dopisom z dne 1. aprila 2008 Komisijo obvestila o ad hoc individualni pomoči za usposabljanje v znesku 57 milijonov EUR za avtomobilskega proizvajalca Ford Romania SA s sedežem v Craiovi.
By letter dated 10 September 2008, the Commission informed Romania that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (now Article 108(2) TFEU) [2] with respect to the notified aid, and called on interested parties to submit comments [3].
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 10. septembra 2008 Romunijo obvestila, da se je v zvezi s priglašeno pomočjo odločila za sprožitev postopka iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe ES (zdaj člen 108(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije) [2], pri čemer je zainteresirane stranke pozvala, naj predložijo svoje pripombe [3].
By letter of 26 November 2008, the Commission accepted the beneficiary’s request to extend the deadline for submitting its comments.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 26. novembra 2008 odobrila prošnjo upravičenca za podaljšanje roka za predložitev pripomb.
The Commission did not receive comments from other interested third parties.
Komisija ni prejela pripomb drugih zainteresiranih tretjih strank.