natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation, which provides that any extended measure may apply to imports which entered the Community under the registration imposed by the initiating Regulation, duties should be collected on those registered imports of HPT consigned from Thailand.
V skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe, ki določa, da se lahko vsak razširjeni ukrep uporablja za uvoz, za katerega v Skupnosti velja registracija, uvedena z začetno uredbo, bi bilo treba pobirati dajatve za navedeni registrirani uvoz HPT, ki so bili poslani iz Tajske.
It is recalled that during the present investigation no Thai exporter/producer of HPT to the Community was found to exist in Thailand or made itself known to the Commission and cooperated with the proceeding.
Opominja se, da med sedanjo preiskavo na Tajskem ni bil ugotovljen obstoj nobenega tajskega izvoznika/proizvajalca HPT v Skupnost, oziroma nobeden se ni javil Komisiji in sodeloval v postopku.
Notwithstanding the above, any Thai exporter/producer deemed to be concerned which would consider lodging a request for an exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty pursuant to Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation will be required to complete a questionnaire in order to enable the Commission to determine whether an exemption may be warranted.
Ne glede na zgoraj navedeno, bodo morali zadevni izvozniki/proizvajalci, ki nameravajo vložiti zahtevek za izvzetje iz razširjene protidampinške dajatve v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe, izpolniti vprašalnik, da lahko Komisija določi, ali lahko odobri izvzetje.
The Commission would normally also carry out an on-the-spot verification visit.
Komisija običajno izvede tudi preveritveni obisk na kraju samem.
The definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to ‘all other companies’ imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts, i.e. chassis and hydraulics, as defined in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 684/2008, originating in the People’s Republic of China, is hereby extended to hand pallet trucks and their essential parts, i.e. chassis and hydraulics, as defined in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 684/2008, falling within CN code ex84279000 and ex84312000 (TARIC codes 8427900011 and 8431200011), consigned from Thailand whether declared as originating in Thailand or not.
Dokončna protidampinška dajatev, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“, uvedena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1174/2005 na uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov, to sta šasija in hidravlika, kakor so opredeljeni v členu 1 Uredbe (ES) št. 1174/2005, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 684/2008, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, se razširi na ročne vozičke za premeščanje palet in njihove osnovne dele, to sta šasija in hidravlika, kakor so opredeljeni v členu 1 Uredbe (ES) št. 1174/2005, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 684/2008, uvrščene pod oznaki KN ex84279000 in ex84312000 (oznaki TARIC 8427900011 in 8431200011), poslane iz Tajske, s prijavljenim poreklom iz Tajske ali ne.
The duties extended by paragraph 1 shall be collected on imports registered in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 923/2008 and Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96.
Dajatve, razširjene z odstavkom 1, se poberejo za uvožene izdelke, registrirane v skladu s členom 2 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 923/2008 in členoma 13(3) in 14(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96.
Requests for exemption from the duty extended by Article 1 shall be made in writing in one of the official languages of the European Union and must be signed by a person authorised to represent the applicant.
Zahtevki za izvzetje iz dajatve, razširjene s členom 1, se predložijo v pisni obliki v enem od uradnih jezikov Evropske unije in s podpisom osebe, pooblaščene za zastopanje vložnika.
The request must be sent to the following address:
Zahtevek se pošlje na naslov:
In accordance with Article 13(4) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, the Commission, after consulting the Advisory Committee, may authorise by decision the exemption of imports which do not circumvent the anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 from the duty extended by Article 1.
V skladu s členom 13(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 lahko Komisija po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom s sklepom odobri izvzetje od dajatve, razširjene s členom 1, za uvoz, ki se ne izogiba protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim z Uredbo (ES) št. 1174/2005.
Customs authorities are hereby directed to discontinue the registration of imports, established in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 923/2008.
Carinskim organom se naroči, naj ustavijo registracijo uvoza, ki je bila določena v skladu s členom 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 923/2008.
OJ L 252, 20.9.2008, p. 3.
UL L 252, 20.9.2008, str. 3.
With respect to China imports of HPT to the EC increased from 240639 trucks in 2005 to 538271 in 2007 and 584786 during the IP.
Uvoz HPT iz Kitajske v ES pa se je povečal z 240639 vozičkov v letu 2005 na 538271 v letu 2007 ter 584786 med OP.
According to the available information, this increase is mainly attributed to increased exports of the sole Chinese exporting producer, which has the lowest anti-dumping duty rate.
Po razpoložljivih informacijah je to povišanje povezano predvsem s povečanim izvozom edinega kitajskega proizvajalca izvoznika z najnižjo stopnjo protidampinške dajatve.
Council Regulation (EC) No 500/2009
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 500/2009
amending Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain castings originating in the People’s Republic of China
o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1212/2005 o uvedbi dokončnih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz nekaterih ulitkov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Article 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“ in zlasti člena 11(3) Uredbe,
By Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005 [2] the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain castings originating in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) (definitive measures Regulation).
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1212/2005 [2] je Svet uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih ulitkov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (LRK) („uredba o uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov“).
Individual duty rates ranged from 0 % to 37,9 %, and the residual duty level was set at 47,8 %.
Individualne stopnje dajatev so se gibale med 0 % in 37,9 %, preostala stopnja dajatev pa je bila 47,8 %.
A joint undertaking offer was accepted from a number of companies together with the China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products (CCME) by Commission Decision 2006/109/EC [3] and Council Regulation (EC) No 268/2006 [4].
S Sklepom Komisije 2006/109/ES [3] in Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 268/2006 [4] je več družb in kitajska gospodarska zbornica za uvoz in izvoz strojev ter elektronskih izdelkov (China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products - CCME) sprejelo ponudbo za sklenitev skupne zaveze.
In view of several new exporting producer requests, the definitive measures Regulation was amended from time to time — most recently in April 2009 [5].
Zaradi zahtevkov novih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je bila uredba o uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov večkrat spremenjena, zadnjič aprila 2009 [5].
INITIATION OF REVIEW INVESTIGATION AND PROCEDURE
ZAČETEK PREISKAVE V ZVEZI S PREGLEDOM IN POSTOPEK
On 8 November 2007, the Commission received a request for an interim review, pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je 8. novembra 2007 prejela zahtevek za vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged by Eurofonte (the applicant), acting on behalf of nine European producers.
Zahtevek je vložila družba Eurofonte („vložnik“) v imenu devetih evropskih proizvajalcev.
The applicant alleged that there was a lack of clarity as to the scope of the measure as set out in the definitive measures Regulation.
Vložnik je trdil, da je obseg ukrepa, kakor je določen v uredbi o uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov, nejasen.
The applicant alleged that the product scope should be clarified as far as castings of ductile iron are concerned and in particular whether this kind of castings should fall within the definition of the product concerned.
Vložnik je trdil, da je treba pojasniti obseg izdelka, kar zadeva ulitke iz nodularne litine in zlasti, ali opredelitev zadevnega izdelka zajema te vrste ulitkov.
Having determined that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of a partial interim review, and after consulting the Advisory Committee, the Commission, by a notice (the review Notice of initiation) published in the Official Journal of the European Union [6], initiated an investigation in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Po ugotovitvi, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda, in posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom je Komisija z obvestilom („obvestilo o začetku pregleda“), objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [6], začela preiskavo v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
The investigation was limited in scope to the definition of the product subject to the measures in force.
Preiskava je bila po obsegu omejena na opredelitev izdelka, za katerega veljajo ukrepi.
The Commission advised the known Community producers, importers and users, the representatives of the exporting country as well as all known exporters in the PRC of the initiation of the review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda obvestila znane proizvajalce Skupnosti, uvoznike in uporabnike, predstavnike države izvoznice ter vse znane izvoznike v LRK.
The Commission requested information from all abovementioned parties and from those other parties who made themselves known within the time limit set in the review Notice of initiation.
Komisija je zahtevala informacije od vseh navedenih strank in tistih strank, ki so se odzvale v roku iz obvestila o začetku pregleda.
The Commission also gave interested parties the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing.
Poleg tega je dala vsem zainteresiranim strankam možnost, da pisno predstavijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
Fifteen Community producers, nine importers in the Community unrelated to Chinese exporting producers, one Community user and 17 Chinese exporting producers submitted a questionnaire reply.
Odgovore na vprašalnik je poslalo 15 proizvajalcev Skupnosti, 9 uvoznikov Skupnosti, nepovezanih s kitajskimi proizvajalci izvozniki, en uporabnik Skupnosti in 17 kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Hearings were granted upon request to six interested parties: to the applicant, one Community producer and four importers.
Šestim zainteresiranim strankam je bilo na zahtevo zagotovljeno zaslišanje, in sicer vložniku, enemu proizvajalcu Skupnosti in štirim uvoznikom.
The product concerned, as defined in Article 1 of the definitive measures Regulation, is castings of non-malleable cast iron of a kind used to cover and/or give access to ground or sub-surface systems, and parts thereof, whether or not machined, coated or painted or fitted with other materials, excluding fire hydrants, originating in the PRC and falling within CN codes 73251050, 73251092 and ex73251099 (Taric code 7325109910).
Zadevni izdelek iz člena 1 uredbe o uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov so ulitki iz netempranega litega železa, ki se uporabljajo za pokritje in/ali dostop do površinskih ali podpovršinskih sistemov in njihovih delov, strojno ali ročno obdelani, premazani ali prevlečeni ali drugače obdelani z materialom, razen požarnih hidrantov, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ter uvrščeni v oznake KN 73251050, 73251092 in ex73251099 (oznaka Taric 7325109910).
In the product definition part of the same Regulation, notably in recital 18, it is mentioned that castings are made of grey or ductile iron and that despite certain differences described in recitals 20 to 21, it is concluded in recitals 22 and 29 that all types of castings have the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics, they are basically used for the same purposes and can be regarded as different types of the same product.
V opredelitvi izdelka v isti uredbi, in sicer v uvodni izjavi 18, je navedeno, da so ulitki narejeni iz sive ali nodularne litine in da se kljub nekaterim razlikam, opisanim v uvodnih izjavah 20 in 21, v uvodnih izjavah 22 in 29 ugotavlja, da imajo vse vrste ulitkov iste osnovne fizikalne, kemične in tehnične značilnosti, iste osnovne uporabe in se lahko štejejo za različne vrste istega izdelka.
According to several parties, the term used in Article 1 of the definitive measures Regulation to describe the product subject to the measures (castings of non-malleable cast iron) does not cover castings made of ductile iron.
Po mnenju več strank izraz iz člena 1 uredbe o uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov za opis izdelka, za katerega veljajo ukrepi („ulitki iz netempranega litega železa“) ne zajema ulitkov iz nodularne litine.
Some parties made reference to another CN subheading concerning tube or pipe fittings of malleable cast iron (CN code 73071910) where the relevant explanatory note of the Combined Nomenclature states that spheroidal cast iron (ductile iron) is malleable.
Nekatere stranke so se sklicevale na drugo podštevilko KN v zvezi s cevmi iz netempranega litega železa (oznaka KN 73071910), pri kateri ustrezna pojasnjevalna opomba Kombinirane nomenklature navaja, da je sferoidno lito železo (nodularna litina) netemprano.
It was therefore claimed that castings made of ductile iron would not be covered by the Regulation, even if in the descriptive part of that Regulation it is stated that all types of castings can be regarded as different types of the same product.
Zato se je trdilo, da uredba ne zajema ulitkov iz nodularne litine, čeprav je v opisnem delu uredbe navedeno, da se vse vrste izdelka lahko štejejo kot različne vrste enega in istega izdelka.
Preliminary comments
Uvodne opombe
Several interested parties claimed that a product scope review would not be the appropriate investigation to tackle the above issue, but that the Commission would have to initiate either a new anti-dumping investigation pursuant to Article 5 of the basic Regulation or an anti-circumvention review pursuant to Article 13 of the basic Regulation.
Več zainteresiranih strank je trdilo, da pregled obsega izdelka ni ustrezen način preiskave za odgovor na navedeno vprašanje in da bi Komisija morala začeti novo protidampinško preiskavo v skladu s členom 5 osnovne uredbe ali pregled proti izogibanju v skladu s členom 13 osnovne uredbe.
Given that the purpose of the investigation is primarily to examine the scope of the original investigation and to adapt, if necessary, the operative part accordingly, a review of the product scope based on Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation is in this particular case the appropriate procedure.
Ker je namen preiskave zlasti proučitev obsega prvotne preiskave in po potrebi ustrezno spremeniti operativni del uredbe, je v tem primeru ustrezen postopek pregled obsega izdelka v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
A new investigation pursuant to Article 5 of the basic Regulation and an anti-circumvention investigation pursuant to Article 13 of the basic Regulation each address different circumstances.
Nova preiskava v skladu s členom 5 osnovne uredbe in preiskava proti izogibanju v skladu s členom 13 osnovne uredbe se uporabljata v drugačnih okoliščinah.
The former may, inter alia, be used to launch an investigation into a product which was not investigated in the original investigation (for example by using a different product definition or originating in countries not subject to measures).
Prva se lahko med drugim uporabi za začetek preiskave izdelka, ki v prvotni preiskavi ni bil preiskan (ker je bila na primer uporabljena drugačna opredelitev izdelka ali ker je bilo poreklo izdelka država, za katero ukrepi niso veljali).
The latter may be used as the basis for an investigation of whether there is circumvention with regard to a product subject to measures.
Druga pa se lahko uporabi kot podlaga za proučitev, ali gre pri izdelku, za katerega veljajo ukrepi, za izogibanje tem ukrepom.
These two types of investigation are therefore not appropriate in the present circumstances.
Ti dve vrsti preiskave zato v sedanjih okoliščinah nista ustrezni.
The initiation of this review was therefore warranted to ensure the proper application of the anti-dumping measures.
Začetek tega pregleda je bil torej upravičen zaradi zagotovitve pravilnega izvajanja protidampinških ukrepov.
Analysis of the original investigation
Analiza prvotne preiskave
In a first step, the original investigation was analysed in order to determine if that investigation had fully covered not only castings made of grey iron, but also those made of ductile cast iron.
Najprej je bila proučena prvotna preiskava, da se ugotovi, ali je navedena preiskava v celoti zajemala ne le ulitke iz sive litine ampak tudi iz nodularne litine.
It is firstly noted that in the Notice of initiation of the original investigation [7], the product is described as ‘certain articles of non-malleable cast iron of a kind used to cover and/or to give access to ground or sub-surface systems, (…) originating in the People’s Republic of China (…), normally declared within CN codes 73251050, 73251092 and 73251099’.
Najprej se opozarja, da je v obvestilu o začetku prvotne preiskave [7] izdelek opisan kot „nekateri izdelki iz netempranega litega železa, ki se uporabljajo za pokritje in/ali dostop do površinskih ali podpovršinskih sistemov […] s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske […], običajno prijavljeni pod oznakami KN 73251050, 73251092 in 73251099.“
The words ‘normally declared under’ clarify that the CN codes mentioned in the Notice of initiation were — as they usually are — given ‘for information only’.
Besede „običajno prijavljeni pod“ pojasnjujejo, da so bile oznake KN iz obvestila o začetku, kakor je to običajno, „zgolj informativne“.
Thus, interested parties could not assume that only products covered by those CN codes would form part of the investigation.
Zato torej zainteresirane stranke niso mogle trditi, da bodo preiskani le izdelki iz navedenih oznak KN.
Complementary to the information on the product scope given in the Notice of initiation, the information in the non-confidential version of the original complaint that was accessible to all interested parties of the proceeding and that was sent to all exporting producers, importers and users listed in the complaint contained further information.
Poleg informacij o obsegu izdelka, navedenih v obvestilu o začetku, je nezaupna različica prvotne pritožbe, dostopne vsem zainteresiranim strankam v postopku in poslane vsem proizvajalcem izvoznikom, uvoznikom in uporabnikom iz pritožbe, vključevala še druge informacije.
In the non-confidential version of the complaint, the definition of the product concerned is exactly the one published in the Notice of initiation.
V nezaupni različici pritožbe je opredelitev zadevnega izdelka popolnoma enaka opredelitvi iz obvestila o začetku.
Further explanations of that general description follow in points 3.2-3.7 of the complaint.
Dodatna razlaga navedenega splošnega opisa sledi v točkah od 3.2 do 3.7 pritožbe.
It follows from various elements in those points that the complaint covered products made of both grey and ductile cast iron.
Iz različnih elementov iz navedenih točk izhaja, da je pritožba zajemala izdelke tako iz sive kot nodularne litine.
For instance, in point 3.5, it is mentioned that ‘the product is made of non-malleable cast iron, which can be grey or ductile cast iron’.
Na primer v točki 3.5 je navedeno, da „je izdelek narejen iz netempranega litega železa, ki je lahko siva ali nodularna litina“.
Furthermore, the production process of castings made of both grey and ductile cast iron is described in point 3.4 of the non-confidential version of the complaint.
Proizvodni proces ulitkov iz sive in nodularne litine je opisan v točki 3.4 nezaupne različice pritožbe.
Moreover, there was no indication that the Notice of initiation was intended to be more limited than the scope of the complaint.
Poleg tega ni nič kazalo, da bi bilo obvestilo o začetku po obsegu bolj omejeno kot pritožba.
Furthermore, during the original investigation, dumping and injury data was collected concerning castings made from both grey and ductile cast iron.
Poleg tega so bili med prvotno preiskavo zbrani podatki glede dampinga in škode v zvezi z ulitki iz sive in nodularne litine.
In particular, in the questionnaires that were sent to known interested parties and to those interested parties who made themselves known and requested a questionnaire, both types were included in the description of the product types which had to be reported in the product classification (product control numbers).
V vprašalnikih, poslanih znanim zainteresiranim strankam in tistim zainteresiranim strankam, ki so se javile in zahtevale vprašalnik, sta bili obe vrsti vključeni v opis vrst izdelka, ki so morale biti navedene v razvrstitvi izdelka (kontrolne številke izdelka).
Therefore, it was clear to all cooperating parties that received a questionnaire that castings made of grey and of ductile cast iron were covered by the investigation.
Zato je bilo vsem sodelujočim strankam, ki so prejele vprašalnik, jasno, da je preiskava zajemala ulitke iz sive ali nodularne litine.
Moreover, the fact that the product classification contained both types ensured that all findings concerning dumping, injury, causality and Community interest of the original investigation related to castings made of grey and ductile cast iron.
Poleg tega je bilo zaradi dejstva, da je razvrstitev izdelka vključevala obe vrsti, jasno, da so se vse ugotovitve prvotne preiskave v zvezi z dampingom, škodo, vzročnostjo in interesom Skupnosti nanašale na ulitke iz sive in nodularne litine.
In addition, the final disclosure text sent to all interested parties and the definitive measures Regulation mentioned at several points that castings can either be made of grey or of ductile cast iron (see in particular recitals 18, 20 and 21).
Hkrati je bilo v dokumentu o končnem razkritju, poslanemu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, in uredbi o uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov večkrat navedeno, da so ulitki lahko narejeni iz sive ali nodularne litine (glej zlasti uvodne izjave 18, 20 in 21).
The differences between both types of castings were examined and explained (see aforementioned recitals).
Razlike med obema vrstama ulitkov so bile proučene in pojasnjene (glej iste uvodne izjave).
Finally, the conclusion drawn in the definitive measures Regulation as stipulated in recital 22 is that the investigation had shown that despite the differences in terms of grey or ductile cast iron, all types of castings share the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics, that they are basically used for the same purposes and that they can be regarded as different types of the same product.
Končno je v uredbi o uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 22, navedeno, da je bilo s preiskavo ugotovljeno, da imajo vse vrste ulitkov kljub razlikam zaradi uporabe sive ali nodularne litine podobne osnovne fizikalne, kemične in tehnične značilnosti, iste osnovne uporabe ter se lahko štejejo za različne vrste enega samega izdelka.
In the light of the foregoing, it can be concluded that the original investigation covered both castings made of grey and of ductile cast iron.
Glede na to se lahko sklene, da je prvotna preiskava zajemala ulitke iz sive in nodularne litine.