natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The four criteria are as follows:(i) the recipient undertaking must actually have public service obligations to discharge and the obligations must be clearly defined;(ii) The parameters on the basis of which the compensation is calculated must be established beforehand in an objective and transparent manner to avoid their affording an economic advantage which could favour the beneficiary firm over competing firms;(iii) the compensation cannot exceed what is necessary to cover all or part of the costs incurred in the discharge of public service obligations, taking into account the relevant receipts and a reasonable profit for discharging those obligations;(iv) where the undertaking which is to discharge public service obligations, in a specific case, is not chosen pursuant to a public procurement procedure which would allow for the selection of the tenderer capable of providing those services at the least cost to the community, the level of compensation needed must be determined on the basis of an analysis of the costs which a typical undertaking, well run and adequately provided with means of transport so as to be able to meet the necessary public service requirements, would have incurred in discharging those obligations, taking into account the relevant revenues and a reasonable profit for discharging the obligations.
Štiri merila sodbe Altmark so:(i) upravičeno podjetje mora biti dejansko pooblaščeno za izvajanje obveznosti javne službe in te obveznosti morajo biti jasno opredeljene;(ii) parametri, na podlagi katerih se izračuna nadomestilo, morajo biti vnaprej objektivno in pregledno določeni za preprečitev, da bi nadomestilo privedlo do ekonomske ugodnosti, ki bi upravičenemu podjetju lahko dajala prednost pred konkurenčnimi podjetji;(iii) nadomestilo ne sme presegati tistega, kar je potrebno za pokritje vseh ali dela stroškov, nastalih pri izvajanju obveznosti javne službe, ob upoštevanju s tem povezanih prihodkov in primernega dobička za izvajanje teh obveznosti;(iv) kadar podjetje, ki bi mu bilo treba poveriti obveznosti javne službe, v konkretnem primeru ni bilo izbrano s postopkom oddaje javnih naročil, ki bi omogočil izbiro kandidata, sposobnega opravljati te storitve po najnižjih stroških za skupnost, je treba raven potrebnega nadomestila opredeliti na podlagi analize stroškov, ki bi jih povprečno podjetje, ki je dobro vodeno in ustrezno opremljeno s prevoznimi sredstvi, da lahko izpolnjuje zahteve javne službe, imelo z izvajanjem teh obveznosti, ob upoštevanju s tem povezanih prihodkov in primernega dobička za izvajanje teh obveznosti.
In that regard, the French authorities also note that the compensation was calculated on the specific basis of obligations (number of crossings, seats available, means of substitution, maximum fares, and so on) and therefore of the parameters in the five-year public service agreements signed in 1991 and 1996 between SNCM and the competent public authority and that those agreements also provided for an adjustment of the compensation on the basis of revenue received.
V zvezi s tem francoski organi opozarjajo tudi, da so bila nadomestila izračunana na natančni podlagi obveznosti (število prevozov, razpoložljiva mesta, nadomestno sredstvo, najvišje cene itd.) in torej parametrov iz petletnih pogodb o javni službi, sklenjenih v letih 1991 in 1996 med družbo SNCM in pristojno javno skupnostjo, ter da so bile v navedenih pogodbah določene tudi prilagoditve nadomestila glede na ustvarjene prihodke.
In particular, the French authorities supplied, in their letter of 8 October 2002 (TREN/A/10050), evidence to show that the structure of SNCM’s operating costs for the period 1991 to 2001 was comparable to that of similar sea passenger transport undertakings such as Brittany Ferries, Seafrance and CMN.
Zlasti so francoski organi v dopisu z dne 8. oktobra 2002 (TREN/A/10050) predložili elemente, ki naj bi dokazovali, da je struktura stroškov poslovanja družbe SNCM v obdobju 1991–2001 primerljiva s strukturo stroškov podobnih podjetij za pomorski potniški prevoz, kot so Brittany Ferries, Seafrance in CMN.
As regards the latter, the French authorities assessed SNCM’s efficiency by comparing activity of cargo and passenger vessels.
Kar zadeva zadnje podjetje, naj bi francoski organi presodili učinkovitost družbe SNCM s primerjavo dejavnosti mešanih tovorov.
Those two companies operate in a similar context, with almost equivalent vessels (3 cargo and passenger vessels for CMN and 4 cargo and passenger vessels for SNCM) and to equivalent destinations.
Ti družbi naj bi namreč delovali v podobnih razmerah s skoraj enakovrednimi ladjami (tri za mešani tovor za CMN in štiri za mešani tovor za SNCM) in enakimi destinacijami.
The data gathered from 1991-2001 made it possible to verify that the productivity ratios (link between salary costs on one hand, and turnover, crossings and vessels on the other) for cargo and passenger vessel activity which are different in 1993, get appreciably closer over the period examined.
Podatki, zbrani za obdobje 1991–2001, naj bi omogočali ugotovitev, da so si razmerja produktivnosti (razmerja med stroški zaposlovanja na eni strani ter prometom, prevozi in ladjami na drugi strani) za dejavnost mešanih tovorov, ki se leta 1993 razlikujejo, v obravnavanem obdobju zelo podobna.
Accordingly, that data shows that during that period, SNCM’s productivity ratios became reconciled with those of an average undertaking in the sector.
Ti podatki naj bi torej kazali, da naj bi se v tem obdobju razmerja produktivnosti družbe SNCM približala razmerjem produktivnosti povprečnega podjetja v sektorju.
OJ L 50, 21.2.2002, p. 66.
UL L 50, 21.2.2002, str. 66.
The French authorities note that, following the expert report referred to by the Commission concerning the accounting and management data submitted by the French authorities, the latter concluded in paragraph 68 of its decision of 30 October 2001 that ‘the public service subsidies did not serve to offset the costs of SNCM’s competitive activities.
Francoski organi namreč opozarjajo, da je Komisija na podlagi poročila strokovnjaka, ki ga je imenovala, o računovodskih podatkih in podatkih o vodenju, ki so jih predložili francoski organi, v odstavku 98 odločbe z dne 30. oktobra 2001 ugotovila, da se „subvencije za javno službo niso uporabile za izravnavo stroškov konkurenčnih dejavnosti družbe SNCM.
The separation of accounts concerning the supply of that service and the audits carried out by the regional and national audit bodies also guarantee that the annual accounts relating to the use of the territorial continuity subsidy give a true picture of the cost of the supply of the public service’.
Ločeno računovodstvo v zvezi z opravljanjem navedene službe in revizije, ki so jih opravili regionalni in nacionalni revizijski organi, zagotavljajo tudi, da so letni računovodski izkazi, ki prikazujejo uporabo subvencije za ozemeljsko kontinuiteto, zanesljiv prikaz stroškov opravljanja javne službe.“
In 2002 the French authorities had championed the strategic nature of SNCM’s holding in Sud-Cargos.
Francoski organi so leta 2002 zagovarjali strateški značaj deleža družbe SNCM v družbi Sud-Cargos.
The development of goods traffic (container growth to the detriment of Roll-On Roll-Off), the repurchase of Delams, another shareholder of Sud-Cargos, by CMA CGM and the economic difficulties of Sud-Cargos are equally factors which explain that that holding was no longer considered as strategic and could be sold in 2005 by SNCM.
Razvoj blagovnega prometa (razvoj zabojnikov v škodo prometa ro-ro), odkup družbe Delmas, druge delničarke družbe Sud-Cargos, ki ga je opravila skupina CMA CGM, ter ekonomske težave družbe Sud-Cargos so dejavniki, ki pojasnjujejo, zakaj ta delež ni več veljal za strateškega in ga je družba SNCM leta 2005 lahko prodala.
Case C-334/99 Federal Republic of Germany v Commission [2003] ECR I-1139.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 28. januarja 2003 v zadevi Zvezna republika Nemčija proti Komisiji (334/99, Recueil, str. I-1139).
Commission Decision of 7 December 2005 on the State aid implemented by Belgium for ABX Logistics (No C 53/03 (ex NN 62/03)), OJ L 383, 28.12.2006, p. 21.
Odločba Komisije z dne 7. decembra 2005 o državni pomoči Belgije za ABX Logistics (št. C 53/2003 (prej NN 62/2003)) – UL L 383, 28.12.2006, str. 21.
Commission Decision of 8 July 1999 on State aid granted by Germany to Gröditzer Stahlwerke GmbH and its subsidiary Walzwerk Burg GmbH, OJ L 292, 13.11.1999.
Odločba Komisije z dne 8. julija 1999 o državni pomoči Nemčije za Gröditzer Stahlwerke GmbH in njeno hčerinsko družbo Walzwrk Burg GmbH, UL L 292, 13.11.1999.
That report was sent to the Commission in March 2006 and was drawn up by CGMF with the assistance of Ernst & Young, SNCM’s legal auditor (the CGMF report).
To poročilo je bilo Komisiji poslano marca 2006, pripravila pa ga je družba CGMF s podporo družbe Ernst & Young, zakonitega revizorja družbe SNCM (v nadaljnjem besedilu: poročilo CGMF).
The report drawn up on 29 March 2006 by Oddo Corporate Finance and the firm Paul Hastings (Oddo report) was sent to the Commission on 7 April 2006.
Poročilo, ki sta ga 29. marca 2006 pripravili družba Oddo Corporate Finance in odvetniška pisarna Paul Hastings (poročilo Oddo), je bilo 7. aprila 2006 poslano Komisiji.
It consists of a critical review, requested by the Agence des Participations de l’Etat (APE), the CGMF reports and an approach based on the liquidation costs deemed acceptable at the Community level.
Vsebuje kritičen pregled poročil družbe CGMF, ki ga je zahtevala Agence des Participations de l’Etat (APE), in pristop na podlagi likvidacijskih stroškov, ki na ravni Skupnosti štejejo za sprejemljive.
Joined Cases C-278/92, C-279/92 and C-280/92 Spain v Commission [1994] ECR I-4103.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 14. septembra 1994 v zadevi Španija proti Komisiji (278/92, 279/92 in 280/92, Recueil, str. I-4103).
Case Aspocomp Group Oyj; Judgment of the Court of Appeal of Rouen of 22 March 2005.
Zadeva Aspocomp Group Oyj; sodba pritožbenega sodišča v Rouenu z dne 22. marca 2005.
By comparison, the rates of return of an OAT (Obligation Assimilable du Trésor, a bond issued by the State) on maturity after 30 years, 10 years, 5 years and 2 years respectively are 3,95 %, 3,82 %, 3,75 % and 3,72 % at 31 October 2006.
Za primerjavo, stopnja donosa OAT (Obligation Assimilable du Trésor, obveznica, ki jo izda francoska država) z ročnostjo 30 let, deset let, pet let in dve leti je 3,95 %, 3,82 %, 3,75 % oziroma 3,72 % na dan 31. oktobra 2006.
Commission Decision of 17 July 2002, Société Française de Production, C(2002) 2593 final — OJ C 71, 25.3.2003, p. 3.
Odločba Komisije z dne 17. julija 2002, Société Française de Production, C(2002) 2593 konč. – UL C 71, 25.3.2003, str. 3.
According to an independent market study submitted by France in that regard, CFF currently has almost […] % of the passenger market whereas SNCM went from 82 % market share in 2000 to […] % in 2005 and saw very strong growth on the freight market in which SNCM is still the main carrier owing to its holding in CMN.
Glede na neodvisno tržno študijo, ki jo je v zvezi s tem poslala Francija, ima družba CFF trenutno skoraj […] % trga potnikov, medtem ko je družba SNCM prešla z 82-odstotnega tržnega deleža leta 2000 na […]-odstotni tržni delež leta 2005 in doživela veliko rast na trgu tovora, na katerem je družba SNCM zaradi svojega deleža v družbi CMN še vedno glavni prevoznik.
CFF points out that the public service delegation contract allocates a public grant to the company of EUR 64,3 million on average a year, making a total of EUR 321,5 million over five years.
CFF opozarja, da pogodba o prenosu pooblastil javne službe družbi zagotavlja državno subvencijo v višini povprečno 64,3 milijona EUR na leto, kar je skupaj 321,5 milijona EUR za pet let.
The decision to initiate the procedure indicated that one of the measures laid down in the restructuring plan was ‘the closure of the Bastia-Livorno line with dedicated equipment’.
V odločbi o uvedbi postopka je bilo navedeno, da je v načrtu za prestrukturiranje med drugim predvideno „zaprtje linije Bastia–Livorno z namensko opremo“.
CFF’s criticism relates to the following points: no actual reduction in staff, no realisation of SNCM’s shareholdings for the restructuring effort, no account taken of appreciation on vessels.
Kritike družbe CFF se nanašajo na naslednje točke: neobstoj dejanskega zmanjšanja števila zaposlenih, neobstoj mobilizacije deležev družbe SNCM za prestrukturiranje, neupoštevanje povečanja vrednosti ladij.
It argues that EUR 76 million corresponds to the FRF 500 million which the company would lose from its territorial continuity grant for the new period 2002 to 2006.
Znesek v višini 76 milijonov EUR naj bi po mnenju družbe CFF ustrezal 500 milijonom francoskih frankov (FRF), ki bi jih družba morala izgubiti pri svoji subvenciji za ozemeljsko kontinuiteto za novo obdobje 2002–2006.
Compared to the ratios which it itself found in a sample group of 10 shipping companies.
Glede na razmerja, ki jih je sama ugotovila pri desetih pomorskih družbah.
Those ratios vary from 23,69 % (for Moby Lines) through 49,7 % for CMN to 55,09 % (for Grimaldi).
Ta razmerja segajo od 23,69 % (za Moby Lines) do 55,09 % (za Grimaldi) in do 49,7 % za CMN.
CFF cites the shareholding of 50 % in the shipping company Sud-Cargos, the holding of 13 % in Amadeus, an undertaking specialised in air transport reservation systems, the holding in CMN and CGTH’s property assets.
CFF navaja 50-odstotni delež v pomorski družbi Sud-Cargos, 13-odstotni delež v podjetju Amadeus, ki je specializirano za sisteme rezervacij v zračnem prevozu, delež v družbi CMN in nepremičninsko premoženje družbe CGTH.
Key shareholder in CMN.
Glavni delničar družbe CMN.
For the record, the OTC is, together with the Corsican regional and local authorities, the awarding authority in respect of the public service delegation contract.
Da spomnimo, OTC je skupaj z ozemeljsko skupnostjo Korzike organ, ki podeljuje koncesije za pogodbe o prenosu pooblastil javne službe.
As regards the public service delegation for Marseille-Corsica services, the majority of CFF’s observations relate to the procedure for granting the new public service delegation for the period 2007-2012/2013 and the contentious proceedings initiated by CFF before the national courts, which were subsequently dismissed by the national courts.
V zvezi s PPJS za povezave Marseille–Korzika se večina pripomb družbe CFF nanaša na postopke dodelitve nove PPJS za obdobje 2007–2012/2013 in sodne postopke na pobudo družbe CFF pred nacionalnimi prvostopenjskimi sodišči, ki so jih nacionalna sodišča nato zavrnila.
In that regard, CFF notes that, in the second six-month period of 2005, an emergency procedure was initiated before the Tribunal de commerce of Marseille and that voluntary liquidation could have been intended for autumn 2005 in respect of the losses estimated at EUR million in 2005.
V zvezi s tem CFF opozarja, da je bil v drugi polovici leta 2005 sprožen opozorilni postopek pred trgovinskim sodiščem v Marseillu in da bi bilo od jeseni 2005 mogoče predvideti prijavo stečaja zaradi izgub, ocenjenih na 30 milijonov EUR leta 2005.
According to CFF, the Court of Cassation, in the case of Mines et produits chimiques de Salsignes, does not refer at all to the direct liability of the State shareholder in the event of liquidation of the undertaking of which it is the shareholder but rather the possibility of conducting an action for payment of social debts against a public company of an industrial and commercial nature and the fact that it is impossible for their managers to escape from their obligations by relying on action by the public authorities.As regards the non-application to the present case of the case-law of the Court of Appeal of Rouen in the Aspocomp case, CFF submits that the subject-matter of that case-law, relating to an order that a parent company pay to the employees of a subsidiary social benefits for ‘failure to comply with an agreement’ ratified by the former, is very different from the facts of the SNCM file.
Po mnenju družbe CFF namreč kasacijsko sodišče v zadevi Mines et produits chimiques de Salsignes nikjer ne navaja neposredne odgovornosti države delničarke v primeru likvidacije podjetja, katerega delničarka bi bila, ampak možnost vložitve tožbe za plačilo dolgov za socialno varnost zoper javno ustanovo industrijskega in trgovinskega značaja ter nezmožnost, da se njeni vodje izognejo svojim obveznostim s sklicevanjem na posredovanje javnih oblasti.Kar zadeva uporabo sodne prakse pritožbenega sodišča v Rouenu v zadevi Aspocomp za obravnavani primer, CFF trdi, da je predmet te sodbe, ki se nanaša na obsodbo matične družbe na izplačilo socialnih nadomestil zaposlenim v hčerinski družbi zaradi „neupoštevanja sporazuma“, ki ga je potrdila matična družba, daleč od okoliščin zadeve SNCM.
There is therefore no definite risk that CGMF or the State will be ordered to pay the redundancy payments in the event of compulsory liquidation.
Ne obstaja torej zanesljivo tveganje, da bi bila družba CGMF ali država obsojena na plačilo odpravnin v primeru sodne likvidacije.
However, CFF doubts the estimated figure for the other social costs on account of the fact that they seem to differ depending on the experts asked to provide them.
Poleg tega CFF dvomi o številčni oceni drugih stroškov za socialno varnost, ker se zdi, da se razlikujejo glede na strokovnjake, ki so bili pozvani, naj jih ocenijo.
In that regard, CFF considers that the actual value of the vessels as stated by SNCM at the time it made its bid under the public service delegation ought to have been taken into account in the valuation of SNCM’s assets made in the Oddo and CGMF reports.
V zvezi s tem CFF meni, da bi morala biti realna vrednost ladij, kot jo je navedla družba SNCM ob predložitvi svoje ponudbe na podlagi PPJS, upoštevana pri oceni sredstev družbe SNCM, opravljeni v poročilih Oddo in CGMF.
According to CFF, France emphasises the essential nature of all of the services to Corsica, the maintenance of the fleet at the current level and the alleged strategic nature of SNCM’s shareholding in the CMN group.
Po navedbah družbe CFF Francija vztraja pri bistveni naravi celovitosti povezave z Nico, ohranitvi ladjevja na sedanji ravni in domnevno strateškem značaju deleža družbe SNCM v skupini CMN.
On 1 January 2007, with the arrival of Superfast X.
S 1. januarjem 2007 s prihodom Superfast X.
CFF proposes to restrict to 2005 levels capacity available on each of the competitive markets (Nice, Tunisia and Algeria), to refrain from opening any new routes and to reconfigure the Marseille-Corsica route to cargo and passenger vessels in order to reduce costs.
CFF predlaga, naj se zmogljivosti, ki so na voljo na vsakem od konkurenčnih trgov (Nica, Tunizija in Alžirija), omejijo na ravni iz leta 2005, naj se ne odpre nobena nova linija in naj se povezava Marseille–Korzika preoblikuje v povezavo za mešani tovor, da se znižajo stroški.
Finally, SNCM has had an aggressive tariff policy since 2003 with prices lower than those applied by CFF in breach of Article 4 of that decision (tickets up to 30 % cheaper for identical or comparable services).
Nazadnje naj bi družba SNCM od leta 2003 izvajala agresivno cenovno politiko z nižjimi cenami od cen, ki jih uporablja CFF, kar je v nasprotju s členom 4 navedene odločbe (do 30 % cenejše vozovnice za enake ali podobne storitve).
Owing, on the one hand, to the lack of knowledge of the respective methods of accounting and analytical allocation of the two companies and, secondly, to the fact that CMN did not participate in such a study.
Zaradi po eni strani pomanjkanja poznavanja zadevnih računovodskih metod in analitičnega pripisa obeh družb ter po drugi strani nesodelovanja družbe CMN pri taki študiji.
According to STIM, SNCM deliberately underestimated its financial results.
Po mnenju družbe STIM naj bi SNCM namerno podcenila svoje finančne rezultate.
According to the audit of an independent expert on behalf of the Office des Transports de Corse, the overall deficit of the Corsican network amounts to FF 125 million (approximately EUR 19 million) for the years 1996–2001, excluding the exceptional results of 2001.
Po oceni neodvisnega strokovnjaka za račun Office des Transports de Corse naj bi akumulirani primanjkljaj korziške mreže družbe SNCM znašal 125 milijonov FRF (približno 19 milijonov EUR) v obdobju 1996–2001, brez izrednega rezultata iz leta 2001.
Joined Cases C-328/99 and C-399/00 Italy and SIM 2 Multimedia v Commission [2003] ECR I-4035.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 8. maja 2003 v zadevi Italija in SIM 2 Multimedia proti Komisiji (328/99 in 399/00, Recueil, str. I-4035).
Among the facts relied on by that report, it appears that […]
Iz dejstev, navedenih v tem poročilu, izhaja, da […].
In support of the report of the Court of Auditors, the report refers, for example, to […]
V podporo poročilu Računskega sodišča je v poročilu navedeno na primer, da […].
The State, for example […]
Država ima na primer […].
The report severely criticises, inter alia, the following acts of mismanagement: […]
V poročilu so med drugim izpostavljene naslednje napake pri upravljanju: […].
The number of vessels has been reduced and the programme for the disposal of assets is going ahead according to the industrial plan.
Navtična sredstva so bila zmanjšana, program odprodaje sredstev pa poteka v skladu z industrijskim načrtom.
The 0,497 ratio announced by Corsica Ferries for CMN in 2001 is incorrect because it fails to take account of liquid assets on the balance sheet.
Razmerje 0,497, ki ga je napovedala družba Corsica Ferries za družbo CMN leta 2001, je netočno, saj niso upoštevana likvidna sredstva v bilančnih sredstvih.
With the appropriate correction, CMN’s ratio is 0,557.
Popravljeno razmerje družbe CMN je 0,557.
According to the French authorities, that level is in any event still insufficient for CMN and the cash-flow problems which CMN came up against in 2002 illustrates that.
Po mnenju francoskih organov ta raven vsekakor ostaja nezadostna za družbo CMN, kar ponazarja težak likvidnostni položaj družbe CMN leta 2002.
In fact CMN had to borrow up to EUR 8 million from STEF-TFE to finance a cash deficit not covered by its banks.
CMN si je namreč morala pri skupini Stef-TFE sposoditi do 8 milijonov EUR za financiranje gotovinskega primanjkljaja, ki ga njene banke niso krile.
In its letter of 9 January 2003, the regional council of Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur cited the market study which had been sent to the Commission in connection with the notification, of which it obviously had a copy, pointing out the following finding: ‘Supply [of services between Corsica and mainland France] is in excess of demand.
Regionalni svet Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur je v dopisu z dne 9. januarja 2003 namreč navajal tržno študijo, ki je bila Komisiji poslana na podlagi priglasitve in kopijo katere je očitno imel, pri čemer je poudaril naslednjo ugotovitev: „Ponudba [glede povezave med Korziko in francosko celino] je preobsežna glede na povpraševanje.
The passenger rate of vessels varies on average from 20 % in winter to 50 % in summer’.
Povprečna stopnja zasedenosti ladij je od 20 % pozimi do 50 % poleti.“
In particular, it refutes STIM’s estimated value of the undertaking of nearly EUR 350 million which takes into account only the items of the balance sheet which improve the value from accounting capital (special depreciation, residual gains from vessels and so on) without taking account of liabilities which then reduce it.
Zlasti izpodbija oceno vrednosti podjetja na skoraj 350 milijonov EUR, ki jo je opravila družba STIM in v kateri se upoštevajo samo bilančne postavke, ki izboljšujejo valorizacijo na podlagi knjigovodskega lastniškega kapitala (pospešene amortizacije, preostali dobiček od ladij itd.), ne da bi upoštevali obveznosti, ki jo zmanjšujejo.