natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
 there is information on convictions entered in the criminal record of the person concerned but the convicting Member State intimated that the information about these convictions may not be retransmitted for any purposes other than that of criminal proceedings.
 v kazenski evidenci zadevne osebe so informacije o obsodbah, vendar je država članica izreka obsodbe sporočila, da se informacij o teh obsodbah ne sme posredovati za nobene druge namene, razen za kazenski postopek.
The request for more information may be sent directly to … (please indicate the convicting Member State)
Zahtevek za več informacij se lahko pošlje neposredno … (navedite državo članico izreka obsodbe)
 in accordance with the national law of the requested Member State, requests made for any purposes other than that of criminal proceedings may not be dealt with.
 v skladu z zakonodajo zaprošene države članice ni možno obravnavati zahtevkov, vloženih zaradi drugega namena kot zaradi kazenskega postopka.
Other information (limitations of use of the data concerning requests outside the context of criminal proceedings):
Druge informacije (omejitev uporabe informacij za zahtevke izven okvira kazenskega postopka):
Please indicate the number of pages attached to the reply form:
Prosimo, navedite število priloženih strani:
Signature and official stamp (if appropriate):
Podpis in uradni žig (če je ustrezno):
Name and position/organisation:
Priimek in položaj/organizacija:
If appropriate, please attach a list of convictions and send the complete package to the requesting Member State.
Če je ustrezno, prosimo, da priložite seznam obsodb in vse skupaj pošljite državi članici prosilki.
It is not necessary to translate the form or the list into the language of the requesting Member State.
Obrazca in seznama obsodb ni treba prevajati v jezik države članice prosilke.
To facilitate the identification of the person as much information as possible is to be provided.
Za lažjo identifikacijo osebe je treba vpisati čim več informacij.
Information on convictions handed down in other Member States is currently governed by Articles 13 and 22 of the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters of 20 April 1959.
Informacije o obsodbah, izrečenih v drugih državah članicah, trenutno urejata člena 13 in 22 Evropske konvencije o medsebojni pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah iz leta 1959.
These provisions are not, however, sufficient to meet the present requirements of judicial cooperation in an area such as the European Union.
Vendar pa te določbe niso več zadostne za izpolnjevanje zahtev pravosodnega sodelovanja na območju, kot je Evropska unija.
Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2009/829/PNZ
on the application, between Member States of the European Union, of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention
o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb o nadzornih ukrepih med državami članicami Evropske unije kot alternativi začasnemu priporu
The European Union has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice.
(1) Evropska unija si je postavila za cilj vzdrževanje in razvijanje območja svobode, varnosti in pravice.
According to the Conclusions of the European Council meeting in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999, and in particular point 36 thereof, the principle of mutual recognition should apply to pre-trial orders.
V skladu s Sklepi Evropskega sveta v Tampereju z dne 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 in zlasti s točko 36 Sklepov bi moralo načelo vzajemnega priznavanja veljati tudi za sodne naloge v predsodnem postopku.
The programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition in criminal matters addresses mutual recognition of supervision measures in its measure 10.
Program ukrepov za izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja v kazenskih zadevah obravnava v ukrepu 10 področje vzajemnega priznavanja nadzornih ukrepov.
The measures provided for in this Framework Decision should aim at enhancing the protection of the general public through enabling a person resident in one Member State, but subject to criminal proceedings in a second Member State, to be supervised by the authorities in the State in which he or she is resident whilst awaiting trial.
Ukrepi, predvideni v tem okvirnem sklepu, bi morali izboljšati varstvo širše javnosti, s tem da bi osebi, ki ima prebivališče v eni državi članici, vendar je v kazenskem postopku v drugi državi članici, omogočili, da jo nadzorujejo organi v državi, v kateri prebiva v pričakovanju sojenja.
As a consequence, the present Framework Decision has as its objective the monitoring of a defendants’ movements in the light of the overriding objective of protecting the general public and the risk posed to the public by the existing regime, which provides only two alternatives: provisional detention or unsupervised movement.
Cilj tega okvirnega sklepa je torej spremljanje obtoženčevega gibanja ob upoštevanju pomembnejšega cilja varstva širše javnosti in tveganja za javnost zaradi obstoječega sistema, ki predvideva samo dve možnosti: začasni pripor ali nenadzorovano gibanje.
The measures will therefore give further effect to the right of law-abiding citizens to live in safety and security.
S temi ukrepi se bo torej še bolj uveljavila pravica državljanov, ki spoštujejo zakon, da živijo varno in so zaščiteni.
The measures provided for in this Framework Decision should also aim at enhancing the right to liberty and the presumption of innocence in the European Union and at ensuring cooperation between Member States when a person is subject to obligations or supervision pending a court decision.
Z ukrepi, predvidenimi v tem okvirnem sklepu, bi se obenem morali zavzemati za okrepitev pravice do prostosti in domneve nedolžnosti v Evropski uniji ter zagotovitev sodelovanja med državami članicami, kadar so osebi naložene obveznosti ali ji je odrejen sodni nadzor v obdobju pred izdajo sodne odločbe.
As a consequence, the present Framework Decision has as its objective the promotion, where appropriate, of the use of non-custodial measures as an alternative to provisional detention, even where, according to the law of the Member State concerned, a provisional detention could not be imposed ab initio.
Zato je cilj tega okvirnega sklepa, kjer je primerno, spodbuditi uporabo ukrepov brez odvzema prostosti kot alternativo začasnemu priporu, tudi če po pravu zadevne države članice začasnega pripora ni bilo mogoče odrediti ab initio.
As regards the detention of persons subject to criminal proceedings, there is a risk of different treatment between those who are resident in the trial state and those who are not: a non-resident risks being remanded in custody pending trial even where, in similar circumstances, a resident would not.
V zvezi s priporom oseb v kazenskem postopku obstaja nevarnost različnega obravnavanja tistih oseb, ki imajo prebivališče v državi, kjer poteka sojenje, in oseb, ki nimajo prebivališča v tej državi: osebi, ki nima prebivališča v državi, kjer poteka sojenje, se lahko odvzame prostost v obdobju pred sojenjem tudi takrat, kadar se to v podobnih okoliščinah ne bi zgodilo osebi, ki ima prebivališče v državi, kjer poteka sojenje.
In a common European area of justice without internal borders, it is necessary to take action to ensure that a person subject to criminal proceedings who is not resident in the trial state is not treated any differently from a person subject to criminal proceedings who is so resident.
V skupnem evropskem območju pravice brez notranjih meja je treba sprejeti ukrepe, ki bodo zagotovili, da oseba v kazenskem postopku, ki nima prebivališča v državi, kjer poteka sojenje, ni obravnavana drugače kot oseba v kazenskem postopku, ki ima prebivališče v tej državi.
The certificate, which should be forwarded together with the decision on supervision measures to the competent authority of the executing State, should specify the address where the person concerned will stay in the executing State, as well as any other relevant information which might facilitate the monitoring of the supervision measures in the executing State.
V potrdilu, ki bi ga bilo treba pristojnemu organu države izvršitve posredovati skupaj z odločbo o nadzornih ukrepih, bi moral biti naveden naslov, kjer bo zadevna oseba v državi izvršitve prebivala, pa tudi druge ustrezne informacije, ki bi lahko olajšale spremljanje nadzornih ukrepov v državi izvršitve.
The competent authority in the executing State should inform the competent authority in the issuing State of the maximum length of time, if any, during which the supervision measures could be monitored in the executing State.
Pristojni organ v državi izvršitve bi moral pristojni organ v državi izdaje obvestiti, koliko časa se lahko najdlje spremljajo nadzorni ukrepi v državi izvršitve, če je takšno najdaljše obdobje predpisano.
In Member States in which the supervision measures have to be periodically renewed, this maximum length of time has to be understood as the total length of time after which it is legally not possible anymore to renew the supervision measures.
V državah članicah, kjer je treba nadzorne ukrepe redno podaljševati, se to najdaljše obdobje spremljanja razume kot celotno obdobje, po koncu katerega nadzornih ukrepov pravno ni več mogoče podaljšati.
Any request by the competent authority in the executing State for confirmation of the necessity to prolong the monitoring of supervision measures should be without prejudice to the law of the issuing State, which applies to the decision on renewal, review and withdrawal of the decision on supervision measures.
Nobena zahteva pristojnega organa v državi izvršitve za potrditev, da je podaljšanje spremljanja nadzornih ukrepov nujno, ne bi smela posegati v pravo države izdaje, ki ureja odločbe o podaljšanju, pregledu ali odpravi odločbe o nadzornih ukrepih.
Such a request for confirmation should not oblige the competent authority in the issuing State to take a new decision to prolong the monitoring of supervision measures.
Pristojni organ v državi izdaje zaradi takšne zahteve za potrditev ne bi smel biti dolžan sprejeti nove odločbe o podaljšanju spremljanja nadzornih ukrepov.
The competent authority in the issuing State should have jurisdiction to take all subsequent decisions relating to a decision on supervision measures, including ordering a provisional detention.
Pristojni organ države izdaje bi morali biti pristojen za vse nove odločbe v zvezi z odločbo o nadzornih ukrepih, vključno z odreditvijo začasnega pripora.
Such provisional detention might, in particular, be ordered following a breach of the supervision measures or a failure to comply with a summons to attend any hearing or trial in the course of criminal proceedings.
Takšen začasen pripor se lahko odredi zlasti zaradi kršitve nadzornih ukrepov ali neupoštevanja sodnega poziva za udeležbo na zaslišanju ali sodni obravnavi med kazenskim postopkom.
In order to avoid unnecessary costs and difficulties in relation to the transfer of a person subject to criminal proceedings for the purposes of a hearing or a trial, Member States should be allowed to use telephone- and videoconferences.
Da bi se izognili nepotrebnim stroškom in težavam v zvezi s privedbo osebe v kazenskem postopku za namen zaslišanja ali sojenja, bi moralo biti državam članicam dovoljeno, da uporabljajo telefonske konference in videokonference.
Where appropriate, electronic monitoring could be used for monitoring supervision measures in accordance with national law and procedures.
Po potrebi bi se lahko elektronsko spremljanje uporabilo za spremljanje nadzornih ukrepov v skladu z nacionalnim pravom in postopki.
This Framework Decision should make it possible that supervision measures imposed on the person concerned are monitored in the executing State, while ensuring the due course of justice and, in particular, that the person concerned will be available to stand trial.
Ta okvirni sklep bi moral omogočiti, da se nadzorni ukrepi, izrečeni zoper zadevno osebo, spremljajo v državi izvršitve, medtem ko se zagotavlja nemoteno delo sodišča ter zlasti, da bo zadevna oseba na voljo za sodno obravnavo pred sodiščem.
In case the person concerned does not return to the issuing State voluntarily, he or she may be surrendered to the issuing State in accordance with Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States [2] (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant’).
Če se zadevna oseba ne vrne v državo izdaje prostovoljno, se jo lahko preda državi izdaje v skladu z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2002/584/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami [2] (v nadaljevanju: Okvirni sklep o evropskem nalogu za prijetje).
While this Framework Decision covers all crimes and is not restricted to particular types or levels of crime, supervision measures should generally be applied in case of less serious offences.
Medtem ko so v ta okvirni sklep zajeta vsa kazniva dejanja in okvirni sklep torej ni omejen na določene vrste ali teže kaznivih dejanj, bi se morali nadzorni ukrepi načeloma uporabiti v primeru lažjih kaznivih dejanj.
Therefore all the provisions of the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant, except Article 2(1) thereof, should apply in the situation when the competent authority in the executing State has to decide on the surrender of the person concerned.
Kadar mora pristojni organ v državi izvršitve odločati o predaji zadevne osebe, bi bilo treba torej uporabljati vse določbe iz Okvirnega sklepa o evropskem nalogu za prijetje, razen člena 2(1) Okvirnega sklepa o evropskem nalogu za prijetje.
As a consequence, also Article 5(2) and (3) of the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant should apply in that situation.
To pomeni, da bi bilo treba v takšnem primeru uporabiti tudi člen 5(2) in (3) Okvirnega sklepa o evropskem nalogu za prijetje.
Costs relating to the travel of the person concerned between the executing and issuing States in connection with the monitoring of supervision measures or for the purpose of attending any hearing are not regulated by this Framework Decision.
Ta okvirni sklep ne ureja stroškov potovanja zadevne osebe med državo izvršitve in državo izdaje zaradi spremljanja nadzornih ukrepov ali udeležbe na zaslišanju.
The possibility, in particular for the issuing State, to bear all or part of such costs is a matter governed by national law.
Možnost kritja dela stroškov ali vseh stroškov, zlasti za državo izdaje, ureja nacionalno pravo.
Since the objective of this Framework Decision, namely the mutual recognition of decisions on supervision measures in the course of criminal proceedings, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States acting unilaterally and can therefore, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union and Article 5 of the Treaty establishing the European Community.
Ker cilja tega okvirnega sklepa, torej vzajemnega priznavanja odločb o nadzornih ukrepih med kazenskim postopkom, države članice z enostranskimi ukrepi ne morejo v zadovoljivo doseči in ker je te cilje zaradi njihovega obsega in učinkov lažje doseči na ravni Unije, Unija lahko sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in člena 5 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Framework Decision does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta okvirni sklep ne prekoračuje okvirov, ki so potrebni za doseganje tega cilja.
This Framework Decision respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised, in particular, by Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union and reflected by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Ta okvirni sklep spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, ki jih še posebej priznava člen 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in so podana v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
Nothing in this Framework Decision should be interpreted as prohibiting refusal to recognise a decision on supervision measures if there are objective indications that it was imposed to punish a person because of his or her sex, race, religion, ethnic origin, nationality, language, political convictions or sexual orientation or that this person might be disadvantaged for one of these reasons.
Nič v tem okvirnem sklepu se ne bi smelo razlagati kot prepoved zavrnitve priznanja odločbe o nadzornih ukrepih, če obstajajo objektivni razlogi za domnevo, da je bil naložen z namenom kaznovanja osebe zaradi njenega spola, rase, vere, etničnega izvora, državljanstva, jezika, političnega prepričanja ali spolne usmerjenosti ali da bi lahko bila oseba zaradi katerega od teh razlogov v slabšem položaju.
Personal data processed when implementing this Framework Decision should be protected in accordance with Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters [3] and in accordance with the principles laid down in the Council of Europe Convention of 28 January 1981 for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, which all Member States have ratified,
Osebni podatki, ki se obdelujejo pri izvajanju tega okvirnega sklepa, bi morali biti varovani v skladu z Okvirnim sklepom 2008/977/PNZ z dne 27. novembra 2008 o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah [3], in v skladu z načeli, določenimi v Konvenciji Sveta Evrope z dne 28. januarja 1981 o varstvu posameznikov glede avtomatske obdelave osebnih podatkov, ki so jo ratificirale vse države članice –
This Framework Decision lays down rules according to which one Member State recognises a decision on supervision measures issued in another Member State as an alternative to provisional detention, monitors the supervision measures imposed on a natural person and surrenders the person concerned to the issuing State in case of breach of these measures.
Ta okvirni sklep določa pravila, skladno s katerimi država članica prizna odločbo o nadzornih ukrepih, ki je bila izdana v drugi državi članici kot alternativa začasnemu priporu, spremlja nadzorne ukrepe, izrečene zoper fizično osebo, in v primeru kršitve teh ukrepov državi izdaje preda zadevno osebo.
The objectives of this Framework Decision are:
Cilji tega okvirnega sklepa so:
to ensure the due course of justice and, in particular, that the person concerned will be available to stand trial;
zagotoviti pravilno izvajanje postopka, zlasti pa, da bo zadevna oseba na voljo za sodno obravnavo pred sodiščem;
to promote, where appropriate, the use, in the course of criminal proceedings, of non-custodial measures for persons who are not resident in the Member State where the proceedings are taking place;
po potrebi v kazenskem postopku spodbujati uporabo ukrepov brez odvzema prostosti za osebe, ki nimajo prebivališča v državi članici, v kateri poteka postopek;
to improve the protection of victims and of the general public.
izboljšati varstvo žrtev in širše javnosti.
This Framework Decision does not confer any right on a person to the use, in the course of criminal proceedings, of a non-custodial measure as an alternative to custody.
Ta okvirni sklep ne daje nobene pravice osebi, da med kazenskim postopkom kot alternativo odvzemu prostosti uporabi ukrep brez odvzema prostosti.
This is a matter governed by the law and procedures of the Member State where the criminal proceedings are taking place.
To je zadeva, ki jo urejajo pravo in postopki države članice, v kateri poteka kazenski postopek.
Protection of law and order and the safeguarding of internal security
Varovanje javnega reda in miruter notranje varnosti
This Framework Decision is without prejudice to the exercise of the responsibilities incumbent upon Member States with regard to the protection of victims, the general public and the safeguarding of internal security, in accordance with Article 33 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ta okvirni sklep ne posega v izpolnjevanje obveznosti, ki jih imajo države članice glede varovanja žrtev, širše javnosti in varovanja notranje varnosti v skladu s členom 33 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
‘decision on supervision measures’ means an enforceable decision taken in the course of criminal proceedings by a competent authority of the issuing State in accordance with its national law and procedures and imposing on a natural person, as an alternative to provisional detention, one or more supervision measures;
„odločba o nadzornih ukrepih“ pomeni izvršljivo odločbo pristojnega organa države izdaje, sprejeto med kazenskim postopkom v skladu z njenim nacionalnim pravom in postopki, s katero se fizični osebi, kot alternativa začasnemu priporu, izreče eden ali več nadzornih ukrepov;
‘supervision measures’ means obligations and instructions imposed on a natural person, in accordance with the national law and procedures of the issuing State;
„nadzorni ukrepi“ pomeni obveznosti in navodila, izrečena fizični osebi v skladu z nacionalnim pravom in postopki države izdaje;
‘issuing State’ means the Member State in which a decision on supervision measures has been issued;
„država izdaje“ pomeni državo članico, v kateri je bila izdana odločba o nadzornih ukrepih;
‘executing State’ means the Member State in which the supervision measures are monitored.
„država izvršitve“ pomeni državo članico, v kateri se spremljajo nadzorni ukrepi.
Each Member State shall inform the General Secretariat of the Council which judicial authority or authorities under its national law are competent to act according to this Framework Decision in the situation where that Member State is the issuing State or the executing State.
Vsaka država članica obvesti generalni sekretariat Sveta o tem, kateri pravosodni organ ali pravosodni organi so po njeni nacionalni zakonodaji pristojni za ukrepanje v skladu s tem okvirnim sklepom, če je ta država članica država izdaje sodbe ali država izvršitve.
As an exception to paragraph 1 and without prejudice to paragraph 3, Member States may designate non-judicial authorities as the competent authorities for taking decisions under this Framework Decision, provided that such authorities have competence for taking decisions of a similar nature under their national law and procedures.
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 in brez poseganja v odstavek 3 lahko države članice imenujejo nepravosodne organe kot pristojne organe za odločanje na podlagi tega okvirnega sklepa pod pogojem, da so ti organi v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom in postopki pristojni za sprejemanje podobnih odločb.
Decisions referred to under Article 18(1)(c) shall be taken by a competent judicial authority.
Odločbe iz člena 18(1)(c) sprejme pristojni pravosodni organ.
Recourse to a central authority
Udeležba centralnih organov
Each Member State may designate a central authority or, where its legal system so provides, more than one central authority to assist its competent authorities.
Vsaka država članica lahko imenuje centralni organ ali, kadar tako določa njen pravni sistem, več centralnih organov za pomoč pristojnim organom.
A Member State may, if it is necessary as a result of the organisation of its internal judicial system, make its central authority(ies) responsible for the administrative transmission and reception of decisions on supervision measures, together with the certificates referred to in Article 10, as well as for all other official correspondence relating thereto.
Država članica lahko, kadar je to potrebno zaradi notranje organiziranosti njenega pravosodnega sistema, sklene, da bo(-do) njen(-i) centralni organ(-i) odgovorni za administrativno pošiljanje in prejemanje odločb o nadzornih ukrepih, skupaj s potrdili iz člena 10, in za vso s tem povezano uradno korespondenco.