natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Other information: He is subject to Tribunale di Milano Custody Order number 36601/2001 R.G.N.R. of 17 May 2005 — 7464/2001 R.G.GIP. Fugitive.’ under the heading ‘Natural persons’ shall be replaced by:
„Merai Zoghbai (tudi (a) Mohamed Lebachir, (b) Meri Albdelfattah Zgbye, (c) Zoghbai Merai Abdul Fattah, (d) Lazrag Faraj, (e) Larzg Ben Ila, (h) Muhammed El Besir, (f) F’raji di Singapore, (g) F’raji il Libico, (h) Farag, (i) Fredj).
The entry ‘Barakaat Telecommunications Co. Somalia, Ltd, PO Box 3313, Dubai, UAE ’ under the heading ‘Legal persons, groups and entities’ shall be replaced by:
Vnos „Barakaat Telecommunications Co. Somalia, Ltd, PO Box 3313, Dubaj, ZAE.“ pod naslovom „Pravne osebe, skupine in subjekti“ se nadomesti z:
Detained in Italy as of September 2007.’ under the heading ‘Natural persons’ shall be replaced by: ‘Said Ben Abdelhakim Ben Omar Al-Cherif (alias (a) Djallal, (b) Youcef, (c) Abou Salman).
Od septembra 2007 zaprt v Italiji.“ pod naslovom „Fizične osebe“ se nadomesti z naslednjim:
, (previous address as at 17.12.2001); (b) Via Manzoni 33, Cinisello Balsamo (MI); Italy (previous address as at March 2004).
, (prejšnji naslov na dan 17. 12. 2001); (b) Via Manzoni 33, Cinisello Balsamo (MI); Italija (prejšnji naslov iz marca 2004).
The entry ‘Maxamed Cabdullaah CIISE, Via Quaranta (mosque), Milan, Italy . Place of birth: Somalia. Date of birth: 8 October1974.’ under the heading ‘Natural persons’ shall be replaced by:
Vnos „Maxamed Cabdullaah CIISE, Via Quaranta (mošeja), Milano, Italija. Kraj rojstva: Somalija. Datum rojstva: 8. oktober 1974.“ pod naslovom „Fizične osebe“ se nadomesti z naslednjim:
, (b) Piazza Trieste 11, Mortara, Italy (domicile as of October 2002).
, (b) Piazza Trieste 11, Mortara, Italija (bivališče od oktobra 2002).
; (b) Sitio Banga Maiti, Barangay Tranghawan, Lambunao, Iloilo, Philippines (previous).
; (b) Sitio Banga Maiti, Barangay Tranghawan, Lambunao, Iloilo, Filipini (prej).
The entry ‘Mohamed Moumou (alias (a) Mohamed Mumu, (b) Abu Shrayda, (c) Abu Amina, (d) Abu Abdallah, (e) Abou Abderrahman). Address: (a) Storvretsvagen 92, 7 TR. C/O Drioua, 142 31 Skogas, Sweden
Vnos „Mohamed Moumou (alias (a) Mohamed Mumu, (b) Abu Shrayda, (c) Abu Amina, (d) Abu Abdallah, (e) Abou Abderrahman. Naslov: (a) Storvretsvagen 92, 7 TR. C/O Drioua, 142 31 Skogas, Švedska
The entry ‘Al-Hamati, Muhammad (aka Al-Ahdal, Mohammad Hamdi Sadiq; aka Al-Makki, Abu Asim), Yemen’ under the heading ‘Natural persons’ shall be replaced by: ‘Muhammad Hamdi Sadiq Al-Ahdal (alias (a) Al-Hamati, Muhammad, (b) Muhammad Muhammad Abdullah Al-Ahdal, (c) Abu Asim Al-Makki).
Vnos „Al-Hamati, Muhammad (tudi Al-Ahdal, Mohammad Hamdi Sadiq; tudi Al- Makki, Abu Asim), Jemen.“ pod naslovom „Fizične osebe“ se nadomesti z:
Date of birth: 19.11.1971. Address: Jamal street, Al-Dahima alley, Al-Hudaydah, Yemen . Place of birth: Medina, Saudi Arabia. Nationality: Yemeni. Passport No: 541939 (Yemeni passport issued in Al-Hudaydah, Yemen, issued on 31.7.2000 in the name of Muhammad Muhammad Abdullah Al-Ahdal). National identification No: 216040 (Yemeni identity card number). Date of designation referred to in Article 2a (4) (b): 17.10.2001.’
„Muhammad Hamdi Sadiq Al-Ahdal (tudi (a) Al-Hamati, Muhammad, (b) Muhammad Muhammad Abdullah Al-Ahdal, (c) Abu Asim Al-Makki). Datum rojstva: 19. 11. 1971. Naslov: Jamal street, Al-Dahima alley, Al-Hudaydah, Jemen. Kraj rojstva: Medina, Saudova Arabija. Državljanstvo: jemensko. Št. potnega lista: 541939 (jemenski potni list, izdan 31. 7. 2000 v kraju Al-Hudaydah, Jemen, na ime Muhammad Muhammad Abdullah Al-Ahdal). Nacionalna identifikacijska št.: 216040 (številka jemenske osebne izkaznice). Datum določitve iz člena 2a(4)(b): 17. 10. 2001.“
Date of designation referred to in Article 2a(4)(b): 10.12.2008.’ under the heading ‘Natural persons’ shall be replaced by: ‘Hafiz Muhammad Saeed (alias (a) Hafiz Muhammad, (b) Hafiz Saeed, (c) Hafiz Mohammad Sahib, (d) Hafez Mohammad Saeed, (e) Hafiz Mohammad Sayeed, (f) Hafiz Mohammad Sayid, (g) Tata Mohammad Syeed, (h) Mohammad Sayed, (i) Hafiz Ji (k) Muhammad Saeed).
Datum določitve iz člena 2a(4)(b): 10. 12.
(location as at May 2008). Date of birth: 5.6.1950. Place of birth: Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan. Nationality: Pakistani. National identification No: 3520025509842-7 (Pakistan). Date of designation referred to in Article 2a (4) (b): 10.12.2008.’
„Hafiz Muhammad Saeed (tudi (a) Hafiz Muhammad, (b) Hafiz Saeed, (c) Hafiz Mohammad Sahib, (d) Hafez Mohammad Saeed, (e) Hafiz Mohammad Sayeed, (f) Hafiz Mohammad Sayid, (g) Tata Mohammad Syeed, (h) Mohammad Sayed, (i) Hafiz Ji (k) Muhammad Saeed). Naslov: hišna št. 116E, Mohalla Johar, Lahore, Tehsil, mesto Lahore, okrožje Lahore, Pakistan (bivališče maja 2008). Datum rojstva: 5. 6. 1950. Kraj rojstva: Sargodha, Pandžab, Pakistan. Državljanstvo: pakistansko. Nacionalna identifikacijska št.: 3520025509842-7 (Pakistan). Datum določitve iz člena 2a(4)(b): 10. 12. 2008.“
; (b) Via Cefalonia 11, Milan, Italy (domicile, last known address).
; (b) Via Cefalonia 11, Milano, Italija (bivališče, zadnji znan naslov).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1103/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1103/2009
establishing a prohibition of fishing for herring in EC and international waters of Vb and VIb and VIaN by vessels flying the flag of the United Kingdom
o prepovedi ribolova na atlantskega sleda v vodah ES in mednarodnih vodah con Vb, VIb in VIaN s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavo Združenega kraljestva
EC and international waters of Vb and VIb and VIaN
Vode ES in mednarodne vode con Vb, VIb in VIaN
15 October 2009
15. oktober 2009
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1104/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1104/2009
These prices and duties have been last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1084/2009 [4].
Navedene cene in dolžnosti so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1084/2009 [4].
OJ L 295, 12.11.2009, p. 9.
UL L 295, 12.11.2009, str. 9.
Amended representative prices and additional import duties applicable to white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 17029095 from 18 November 2009
Spremenjene reprezentativne cene in dodatne uvozne dajatve za beli in surovi sladkor ter proizvode z oznako KN 17029095, ki se uporabljajo od 18. novembra 2009
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1105/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1105/2009
of 18 November 2009
z dne 18. novembra 2009
This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 November 2009.
Ta uredba začne veljati 19. novembra 2009.
Done at Brussels, 18 November 2009.
V Bruslju, 18. novembra 2009
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1106/2009
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1106/2009
An acceptance percentage should therefore be set for quantities applied for on 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 November 2009.
Odstotek sprejetja je zato treba določiti za količine, ki se uporabljajo dne 9., 10., 11., 12. in 13. novembra 2009.
All export-licence applications for sugar lodged after 13 November 2009 should accordingly be rejected and the lodging of export-licence applications should be suspended,
Vse zahtevke za izvozna dovoljenja za sladkor, ki so bili vloženi po 13. novembra 2009, je treba v skladu s tem zavrniti in začasno odložiti vlaganje zahtevkov za izvozna dovoljenja –
Export licences for out-of-quota sugar for which applications were lodged from 9 November to 13 November 2009 shall be issued for the quantities applied for, multiplied by an acceptance percentage of 56,540299 %.
Za izvenkvotni sladkor, za katerega so bili od 9. novembra 2009 do 13. novembra 2009 vloženi zahtevki, se izdajo izvozna dovoljenja za količine iz zahtevkov, pomnožene z odstotkom sprejetja, ki znaša 56,540299 %.
Applications for out-of-quota sugar export licences submitted on 16 November, 17 November, 18 November, 19 November and 20 November 2009 are hereby rejected.
Zahtevki za izvozna dovoljenja za izvenkvotni sladkor, ki so bili predloženi 16. novembra, 17. novembra, 18. novembra, 19. novembra in 20. novembra 2009, se zavrnejo.
The lodging of applications for out-of-quota sugar export licences shall be suspended for the period 23 November 2009 to 30 September 2010.
Vlaganje zahtevkov za izvozna dovoljenja za izvenkvotni sladkor se začasno odloži za obdobje od 23. novembra 2009 do 30. septembra 2010.
Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC
o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet in razveljavitvi direktiv Sveta 79/117/EGS in 91/414/EGS
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 37(2), Article 95 and Article 152(4)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti ter zlasti člena 37(2), člena 95 in člena 152(4)(b) Pogodbe,
Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market [4] provides for rules governing plant protection products and the active substances contained in those products.
Direktiva Sveta 91/414/EGS z dne 15. julija 1991 o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet [4] določa pravila, ki urejajo fitofarmacevtska sredstva in aktivne snovi, ki jih ta sredstva vsebujejo.
Following the progress report presented by the Commission under Directive 91/414/EEC, the European Parliament by its Resolution of 30 May 2002 [5] and the Council in its Conclusions of 12 December 2001 asked the Commission to review Directive 91/414/EEC and identified a number of issues for the Commission to address.
V skladu s poročilom o napredku, ki ga je predstavila Komisija v skladu z Direktivo 91/414/EGS, sta Evropski parlament z Resolucijo z dne 30. maja 2002 [5] in Svet v svojih sklepih z dne 12. decembra 2001 pozvala Komisijo, naj pregleda Direktivo 91/414/EGS, in opredelila številna vprašanja, ki jih mora Komisija obravnavati.
In the light of the experience gained from the application of Directive 91/414/EEC and of recent scientific and technical developments, that Directive should be replaced.
Na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih pri uporabi Direktive 91/414/EGS, ter najnovejših znanstvenih in tehničnih spoznanj bi bilo treba navedeno direktivo nadomestiti.
By way of simplification, the new act should also repeal Council Directive 79/117/EEC of 21 December 1978 prohibiting the placing on the market and use of plant protection products containing certain active substances [6].
Zaradi poenostavitve bi moral novi akt razveljavljati tudi Direktivo Sveta 79/117/EGS z dne 21. decembra 1978 o prepovedi prometa in uporabe fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo določene aktivne snovi [6].
To simplify application of the new act and to ensure consistency throughout the Member States, it should take the form of a Regulation.
Za poenostavitev uporabe novega akta in zagotovitev usklajenosti med državami članicami, bi moral biti ta akt v obliki uredbe.
Plant production has a very important place in the Community.
Rastlinska pridelava ima v Skupnosti zelo pomembno mesto.
One of the most important ways of protecting plants and plant products against harmful organisms, including weeds, and of improving agricultural production is the use of plant protection products.
Uporaba fitofarmacevtskih sredstev je eden od najpomembnejših načinov za varstvo rastlin in rastlinskih proizvodov pred škodljivimi organizmi, vključno s plevelom, ter za izboljšanje kmetijske proizvodnje.
Plant protection products can however also have non-beneficial effects on plant production.
Vendar lahko fitofarmacevtska sredstva tudi neugodno vplivajo na rastlinsko pridelavo.
Their use may involve risks and hazards for humans, animals and the environment, especially if placed on the market without having been officially tested and authorised and if incorrectly used.
Njihova uporaba lahko vključuje tveganje in nevarnost za ljudi, živali in okolje, zlasti če se dajo v promet, ne da bi jih predhodno uradno testirali in registrirali, ter če se nepravilno uporabljajo.
The purpose of this Regulation is to ensure a high level of protection of both human and animal health and the environment and at the same time to safeguard the competitiveness of Community agriculture.
Namen te uredbe je zagotoviti visoko raven varstva zdravja ljudi in živali in varovanja okolja ter hkrati varovati konkurenčnost kmetijstva Skupnosti.
Particular attention should be paid to the protection of vulnerable groups of the population, including pregnant women, infants and children.
Posebno pozornost bi bilo treba nameniti varstvu ranljivih skupin prebivalstva, vključno z nosečnicami, dojenčki in otroki.
The precautionary principle should be applied and this Regulation should ensure that industry demonstrates that substances or products produced or placed on the market do not have any harmful effect on human or animal health or any unacceptable effects on the environment.
Veljati bi moralo previdnostno načelo, ta uredba pa bi morala zagotoviti, da industrija dokaže, da snovi ali sredstva, proizvedeni ali dani v promet, nimajo nobenega škodljivega vpliva na zdravje ljudi ali živali ali nobenega nesprejemljivega vpliva na okolje.
In order to remove as far as possible obstacles to trade in plant protection products existing due to the different levels of protection in the Member States, this Regulation should also lay down harmonised rules for the approval of active substances and the placing on the market of plant protection products, including the rules on the mutual recognition of authorisations and on parallel trade.
Da bi čim bolje odstranili ovire pri trgovanju s fitofarmacevtskimi sredstvi, ki so nastale zaradi različnih ravni varovanja v državah članicah, bi bilo treba s to uredbo določiti tudi usklajene predpise za odobritev aktivnih snovi in dajanje fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet, vključno s predpisi za vzajemno priznavanje registracij in vzporedno trgovanje.
The purpose of this Regulation is thus to increase the free movement of such products and availability of these products in the Member States.
Namen te uredbe je zato povečati prosti pretok teh sredstev in njihovo razpoložljivost v državah članicah.
Substances should only be included in plant protection products where it has been demonstrated that they present a clear benefit for plant production and they are not expected to have any harmful effect on human or animal health or any unacceptable effects on the environment.
Snovi bi se smele vključiti v fitofarmacevtska sredstva le takrat, kadar se dokaže, da nedvomno koristijo rastlinski pridelavi in se ne pričakuje, da bi imeli kakršen koli škodljiv vpliv na zdravje ljudi ali živali ali kakršen koli nesprejemljiv vpliv na okolje.
In order to achieve the same level of protection in all Member States, the decision on acceptability or non-acceptability of such substances should be taken at Community level on the basis of harmonised criteria.
Da se doseže enaka raven varstva v vseh državah članicah, bi bilo treba odločitev o sprejemljivosti ali nesprejemljivosti takšnih snovi na podlagi usklajenih meril sprejeti na ravni Skupnosti.
These criteria should be applied for the first approval of an active substance under this Regulation.
Ta merila bi bilo treba uporabljati za prvo odobritev aktivne snovi na podlagi te uredbe.
For active substances already approved, the criteria should be applied at the time of renewal or review of their approval.
Za že odobrene aktivne snovi bi se ta merila morala uporabljati ob podaljšanju ali pregledu njihove odobritve.
The development of non-animal test methods should be promoted in order to produce safety data relevant to humans and to replace animal studies currently in use.
Treba bi bilo spodbujati razvoj preskusnih metod, pri katerih se ne uporabljajo živali, za pridobitev varnostnih podatkov, ki bi bili relevantni za ljudi, ter nadomestiti študije na živalih, ki se trenutno uporabljajo.
In the interest of predictability, efficiency and consistency, a detailed procedure should be laid down for assessing whether an active substance can be approved.
Zaradi predvidljivosti, učinkovitosti in skladnosti bi bilo treba določiti podroben postopek za oceno, ali se aktivna snov lahko odobri.
The information to be submitted by interested parties for the purposes of approval of a substance should be specified.
Navesti bi bilo treba informacije, ki jih morajo predložiti zainteresirane strani za odobritev snovi.
In view of the amount of work connected with the approval procedure, it is appropriate that the evaluation of such information be performed by a Member State acting as a rapporteur for the Community.
Glede na obseg dela v zvezi s postopkom odobritve je primerno, da oceno takšne informacije izvede država članica, ki je v vlogi poročevalke za Skupnost.
To ensure consistency in evaluation, an independent scientific review should be performed by the European Food Safety Authority established by Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety [7] (the Authority).
Za zagotovitev skladnosti pri ocenjevanju bi morala Evropska agencija za varnost hrane, ustanovljena z Uredbo (ES) št. 178/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2002 o določitvi splošnih načel in zahtevah živilske zakonodaje, ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost hrane in postopkih, ki zadevajo varnost hrane [7] (Agencija) izvesti neodvisen znanstveni pregled.
It should be clarified that the Authority performs a risk assessment whilst the Commission should perform the risk management role and take the final decision on an active substance.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da Agencija izvaja oceno tveganja, medtem ko bi morala Komisija izvajati obvladovanje tveganja in sprejeti dokončno odločitev o aktivni snovi.
Provisions should be included to ensure the transparency of the evaluation process.
Vključiti bi bilo treba določbe za zagotovitev preglednosti postopka ocenjevanja.
For ethical reasons, the assessment of an active substance or a plant protection product should not be based on tests or studies involving the deliberate administration of the active substance or plant protection product to humans with the purpose of determining a human ‘no observed effect level’ of an active substance.
Zaradi etičnih razlogov ocena aktivne snovi ali fitofarmacevtskega sredstva ne bi smela temeljiti na preskusih ali študijah, ki vključujejo namerno uporabo aktivne snovi ali fitofarmacevtskega sredstva na ljudeh z namenom določitve „vrednosti neopaženega učinka“ aktivne snovi pri ljudeh.
Similarly, toxicological studies carried out on humans should not be used to lower the safety margins for active substances or plant protection products.
Prav tako se toksikološke študije, izvedene na ljudeh, ne bi smele uporabiti za znižanje mej varnosti za aktivne snovi ali fitofarmacevtska sredstva.
To speed up the approval of active substances, strict deadlines should be established for the different procedural steps.
Za pospešitev odobritve aktivnih snovi bi bilo treba določiti stroge roke za različne stopnje postopka.
In the interest of safety, the approval period for active substances should be limited in time.
Zaradi varnosti bi moralo biti obdobje odobritve aktivnih snovi časovno omejeno.
The approval period should be proportionate to the possible risks inherent in the use of such substances.
Obdobje odobritve bi moralo biti sorazmerno z možnimi tveganji, ki nastanejo z uporabo takšnih snovi.
Experience gained from the actual use of plant protection products containing the substances concerned and any developments in science and technology should be taken into account when any decision regarding the renewal of an approval is taken.
Pri kakršni koli odločitvi v zvezi z obnovitvijo odobritve bi bilo treba upoštevati izkušnje, dobljene pri dejanski uporabi fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo zadevne snovi, ter kakršne koli dosežke na področju znanosti in tehnologije.
The renewal of the approval should be for a period not exceeding 15 years.
Obnovitev odobritve bi morala veljati največ petnajst let.
The possibility of amending or withdrawing the approval of an active substance in cases where the criteria for approval are no longer satisfied, or where compliance with Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy [8] is compromised, should be provided for under certain conditions.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba možnost spremembe ali preklica odobritve aktivne snovi pod določenimi pogoji, kadar zadevna snov ne izpolnjuje več meril za odobritev ali kadar je ogrožena skladnost z Direktivo 2000/60/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2000 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju vodne politike [8].
The evaluation of an active substance may reveal that it presents considerably less of a risk than other substances.
Ocena aktivne snovi lahko razkrije, da ta snov predstavlja znatno manjše tveganje kot druge snovi.
In order to favour the inclusion of such a substance in plant protection products, it is appropriate to identify such substances and to facilitate the placing on the market of plant protection products containing them.
Da bi pospešili vključitev takšne snovi v fitofarmacevtska sredstva, je primerno, da se takšne snovi opredelijo in olajša dajanje fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo te snovi, v promet.
Incentives should be given for the placing on the market of low-risk plant protection products.
Treba bi bilo dati pobude, da se dajo v promet fitofarmacevtska sredstva z majhnim tveganjem.
Certain substances which are not predominantly used as plant protection products may be of value for plant protection, but the economic interest of applying for approval may be limited.
Nekatere snovi, ki se pretežno ne uporabljajo kot fitofarmacevtska sredstva, so lahko pomembne za varstvo rastlin, vendar je gospodarski interes zahtevka za odobritev lahko omejen.
Therefore, specific provisions should ensure that such substances, as far as their risks are acceptable, may also be approved for plant protection use.
Zato bi bilo treba s posebnimi določbami zagotoviti, da se tudi te snovi, če so tveganja sprejemljiva, lahko odobrijo za uporabo v fitofarmacevtskih sredstvih.
Some active substances with certain properties should be identified at Community level as candidates for substitution.
Nekatere aktivne snovi z določenimi lastnostmi bi bilo treba opredeliti na ravni Skupnosti kot kandidatke za zamenjavo.
Member States should regularly examine plant protection products containing such active substances with the aim of replacing them by plant protection products containing active substances which require less risk mitigation or by non-chemical control or prevention methods.
Države članice bi morale redno pregledovati fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo takšne aktivne snovi, da bi jih nadomestili s fitofarmacevtskimi sredstvi z aktivnimi snovmi, ki zahtevajo manj ukrepov za zmanjšanje tveganja, ali z nekemičnimi ali preventivnimi metodami varstva rastlin.
In certain Member States non-chemical control or prevention methods, which are significantly safer for human and animal health and for the environment, have been established and generally applied for certain uses.
V nekaterih državah članicah so bile vzpostavljene nekemične ali preventivne metode varstva rastlin, ki so bistveno varnejše za zdravje ljudi, živali in za okolje, ter se splošno uporabljajo za določene namene.
In exceptional cases Member States should also be able to apply the comparative assessment when granting authorisation for plant protection products.
V izjemnih primerih bi moralo biti državam članicam dovoljeno, da pri dodeljevanju registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva uporabijo primerjalno oceno.
In addition to active substances, plant protection products may contain safeners or synergists for which similar rules should be provided.
Poleg aktivnih snovi lahko fitofarmacevtska sredstva vsebujejo varovala ali sinergiste, za katere bi bilo treba zagotoviti podobna pravila.