natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It should therefore be specified that the insurance cover is to remain valid during the whole term of the contract, irrespective of whether the vehicle remains in another Member State for a particular period, without prejudice to the obligations under Member States’ national legislation with respect to the registration of vehicles.
Zato je treba določiti, da brez poseganja v obveznosti glede registracije vozil po nacionalni zakonodaji držav članic zavarovalno kritje ostane veljavno celotno obdobje veljavnosti pogodbe, ne glede na to, ali vozilo ostane določeno obdobje v drugi državi članici.
In the interests of the party insured, every insurance policy should guarantee for a single premium, in each Member State, the cover required by its law or the cover required by the law of the Member State where the vehicle is normally based, when that cover is higher.
V interesu zavarovanca je, da vsaka zavarovalna polica v okviru ene same premije zagotavlja v vsaki državi članici kritje, predpisano po njenem pravu, ali, če je to višje kritje, kritje, ki je predpisano po pravu države članice, s katere ozemlja izvira vozilo.
Steps should be taken to make it easier to obtain insurance cover for vehicles imported from one Member State into another, even though the vehicle is not yet registered in the Member State of destination.
Treba bi bilo sprejeti ukrepe, ki bi olajšali pridobitev zavarovalnega kritja za vozila, uvožena iz ene države članice v drugo, četudi vozilo še ni registrirano v namembni državi članici.
A temporary derogation from the general rule determining the Member State where the risk is situated should be made available.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba začasno odstopanje od splošnega pravila za določanje države članice, v kateri je nevarnost.
In order to ensure due protection for victims of motor vehicle accidents, Member States should not permit insurance undertakings to rely on excesses against an injured party.
Da se zagotovi ustrezna zaščita oškodovancev prometnih nesreč, države članice zavarovalnicam ne smejo dopuščati, da se nasproti oškodovancem sklicujejo na franšize.
In order to facilitate an efficient and speedy settlement of claims and to avoid as far as possible costly legal proceedings, a right of direct action against the insurance undertaking covering the person responsible against civil liability should be provided for victims of any motor vehicle accident.
Za učinkovitejšo in hitrejšo obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov in da se v največji možni meri izogne dragim pravnim postopkom, je pravico do neposrednega zahtevka proti zavarovalnici, ki krije civilno odgovornost povzročitelja nesreče, treba razširiti na vse oškodovance prometnih nesreč.
In order to obtain an adequate level of protection for victims of motor vehicle accidents, a ‘reasoned offer’ procedure should be extended to any kind of motor vehicle accident.
Da bo vsem oškodovancem prometnih nesreč zagotovljeno zadostno varstvo, je postopek „utemeljene ponudbe“ treba razširiti na vse vrste prometnih nesreč.
This same procedure should also apply mutatis mutandis where the accident is settled by the system of national insurers’ bureaux.
Enak postopek je treba smiselno uporabljati v primerih, ko se nesreča obravnava v okviru sistema nacionalnih zavarovalnih birojev.
The green card bureau system ensures the ready settlement of claims in the injured party’s country of residence even where the other party comes from a different European country.
Sistem zelene karte zagotavlja takojšnjo obravnavo odškodninskega zahtevka v državi stalnega prebivališča oškodovanca tudi v tistih primerih, ko druga stranka prihaja iz kakšne druge evropske države.
Parties injured as a result of a motor vehicle accident falling within the scope of this Directive and occurring in a State other than that of their residence should be entitled to claim in their Member State of residence against a claims representative appointed there by the insurance undertaking of the responsible party.
Oškodovancem, ki so, kot določa ta direktiva, utrpeli materialno škodo ali telesno poškodbo v prometni nesreči z motornim vozilom v državi, ki ni država njihovega stalnega prebivališča, mora biti omogočeno, da uveljavijo odškodninski zahtevek v državi članici svojega stalnega prebivališča pri pooblaščencu za obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov, ki ga tam imenuje zavarovalnica stranke, odgovorne za škodo.
This solution would enable damage suffered by injured parties outside their Member State of residence to be dealt with under procedures which are familiar to them.
Skladno s takšno rešitvijo bi bilo možno škodo, ki jo je oškodovanec utrpel izven države članice svojega stalnega prebivališča, obravnavati po postopkih, ki so mu znani.
This system of having claims representatives in the injured party’s Member State of residence affects neither the substantive law to be applied in each individual case nor the matter of jurisdiction.
Sistem, po katerem naj bi v državah članicah oškodovančevega stalnega prebivališča imeli pooblaščenca za obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov, ne vpliva na materialno pravo, ki se uporablja v konkretnih primerih, in ne spreminja sodne pristojnosti.
The existence of a direct right of action for the injured party against the insurance undertaking is a logical supplement to the appointment of such representatives and moreover improves the legal position of parties injured as a result of motor vehicle accidents occurring outside their Member State of residence.
Obstoj pravice do neposrednega uveljavljanja zahtevka za izplačilo škode do zavarovalnice za stranko, ki je utrpela materialno škodo ali telesno poškodbo, je logična dopolnitev imenovanja pooblaščencev za obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov, ki nadalje izboljšuje pravni položaj oseb, oškodovanih v prometni nesreči z motornimi vozili, ki se je pripetila zunaj države članice, v kateri ima ta stranka stalno prebivališče.
It should be provided that the Member State where the insurance undertaking is authorised should require that undertaking to appoint claims representatives resident or established in the other Member States to collect all necessary information in relation to claims resulting from such accidents and to take appropriate action to settle the claims on behalf and for the account of the insurance undertaking, including the payment of compensation.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba, da država članica, v kateri je zavarovalnica pridobila dovoljenje, zahteva, da zavarovalnica imenuje pooblaščence za obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov, ki imajo stalno prebivališče ali sedež v drugih državah članicah, ki bodo zbrali potrebne informacije v zvezi z odškodninskimi zahtevki iz takšnih nesreč ter sprejeli ustrezne ukrepe za njihovo obravnavo za ime in za račun zavarovalnice, vključno z ustreznim plačilom odškodnine.
Claims representatives should have sufficient powers to represent the insurance undertaking in relation to persons suffering damage from such accidents, and also to represent the insurance undertaking before national authorities including, where necessary, before the courts, in so far as this is compatible with the rules of private international law on the conferral of jurisdiction.
Ti pooblaščenci za obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov bi morali imeti zadostna pooblastila, da zastopajo zavarovalnico v odnosu do takšnih oškodovancev in pred državnimi organi, po potrebi pa tudi pred sodišči, če je to skladno s predpisi mednarodnega zasebnega in civilnega procesnega prava v zvezi z dodelitvijo sodne pristojnosti.
The activities of the claims representative are not sufficient in order to confer jurisdiction on the courts in the injured party’s Member State of residence if the rules of private international law on the conferral of jurisdiction do not so provide.
Dejavnosti pooblaščencev za obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov ne zadostujejo, da bi sodno pristojnost dodelili sodiščem v državi članici stalnega prebivališča oškodovanca, če to ni predvideno v predpisih mednarodnega zasebnega in civilnega procesnega prava v zvezi z dodelitvijo sodne pristojnosti.
The appointment of representatives responsible for settling claims should be one of the conditions for access to and carrying on the activity of insurance listed in class 10 of point A of the Annex to First Council Directive 73/239/EEC of 24 July 1973 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the taking-up and pursuit of the business of direct insurance other than life assurance [11], except for carriers’ liability.
Imenovanje pooblaščencev za obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov je eden od pogojev za začetek opravljanja in opravljanje zavarovalne dejavnosti v zvezi z zavarovalno vrsto iz točke A Priloge k Prvi direktivi Sveta 73/239/EGS z dne 24. julija 1973 o usklajevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti neposrednega zavarovanja razen življenjskega zavarovanja [11], z izjemo prevozniške odgovornosti.
That condition should therefore be covered by the single official authorisation issued by the authorities of the Member State where the insurance undertaking establishes its head office, as specified in Title II of Council Directive 92/49/EEC of 18 June 1992 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct insurance other than life assurance and amending Directives 73/239/EEC and 88/357/EEC (third non-life insurance Directive) [12].
Ta pogoj bi bilo torej treba zajeti z enotnim uradnim dovoljenjem, ki ga skladno z naslovom II Direktive Sveta 92/49/EGS z dne 18. junija 1992 o spremembah direktiv 73/239/EGS in 88/357/EGS in o uskladitvi zakonov in drugih predpisov o neposrednem zavarovanju razen življenjskega zavarovanja (Tretja direktiva o premoženjskem zavarovanju) [12] izdajo organi države članice, v kateri ima zavarovalnica sedež.
That condition should also apply to insurance undertakings having their head office outside the Community which have secured an authorisation granting them access to the activity of insurance in a Member State of the Community.
Ta pogoj bi moral veljati tudi za zavarovalnice s sedežem zunaj Skupnosti, ki so pridobile dovoljenje za opravljanje zavarovalne dejavnosti v državi članici Skupnosti.
In addition to ensuring that the insurance undertaking has a representative in the State where the injured party resides, it is appropriate to guarantee the specific right of the injured party to have the claim settled promptly.
Poleg tega, da se poskrbi za prisotnost pooblaščenca zavarovalnice v državi, v kateri oškodovanec prebiva, je treba oškodovancu zagotoviti tudi posebno pravico do hitre obravnave odškodninskih zahtevkov.
It is therefore necessary to include in national law appropriate effective and systematic financial or equivalent administrative penalties — such as injunctions combined with administrative fines, reporting to supervisory authorities on a regular basis, on-the-spot checks, publications in the national official journal and in the press, suspension of the activities of the company (prohibition on the conclusion of new contracts for a certain period), designation of a special representative of the supervisory authorities responsible for verifying that the business is run in line with insurance laws, withdrawal of the authorisation for this business line, sanctions to be imposed on directors and management staff — in the event that the insurance undertaking or its representative fails to fulfil its obligation to make an offer of compensation within a reasonable period of time.
Zato bi se morale v nacionalno zakonodajo vključiti ustrezne učinkovite in sistematične finančne ali kake druge enakovredne upravne sankcije – recimo sodne prepovedi v kombinaciji z upravnimi kaznimi, redno obveščanje nadzornih organov, kontrole na samem mestu, objave v nacionalnem uradnem listu in tisku, začasna ustavitev dejavnosti družbe (prepoved sklepanja novih pogodb za določeno obdobje), imenovanje posebnega pooblaščenca nadzornih organov, odgovornega za spremljanje in nadzor tega, ali poslovanje poteka skladno z zavarovalnopravnimi predpisi, odvzem dovoljenja za opravljanje tovrstnih zavarovalnih poslov ter sankcije za direktorje in člane uprave – za primer, da zavarovalnica ali njen pooblaščenec ne izpolnjujeta svoje obveznosti, po kateri bi morala v razumnem roku ponuditi odškodnino.
This should not prejudice the application of any other measure, especially under the law applicable to supervisory matters, which may be considered appropriate.
To ne bi smelo vplivati na uporabo katerega koli drugega ukrepa – zlasti skladno s pravnimi predpisi, ki veljajo za zavarovalni nadzor –, ki velja za primernega.
However, it is a condition that liability and the damage and injury sustained should not be in dispute, so that the insurance undertaking is able to make a reasoned offer within the prescribed period of time.
Vendar pri tem velja pogoj, da tako odgovornost kot povzročena materialna škoda ali telesna poškodba niso sporne, zato lahko zavarovalnica da utemeljeno ponudbo v predpisanem roku.
The reasoned offer of compensation should be in writing and should contain the grounds on the basis of which liability and damages have been assessed.
Takšna ponudba za odškodnino bi morala biti pisna in bi morala vsebovati razloge, na katerih temelji ocena odgovornosti in škode.
In addition to those sanctions, it is appropriate to provide that interest should be payable on the amount of compensation offered by the insurance undertaking or awarded by the court to the injured party when the offer has not been made within the prescribed time limit.
Poleg teh sankcij bi bilo treba predvideti, da se za znesek odškodnine, ki ga zavarovalnica ponudi oškodovancu ali ki mu ga sodišče dodeli, plačajo zamudne obresti, in sicer v primeru, ko ponudba ni predložena v omenjenem predpisanem roku.
If Member States have existing national rules which cover the requirement for late-payment interest, this provision could be implemented by a reference to those rules.
Če v državah članicah že obstajajo nacionalni predpisi z zahtevo po plačilu zamudnih obresti, bi bilo to določbo mogoče izvajati s sklicevanjem na takšne predpise.
Injured parties suffering loss or injury as a result of motor vehicle accidents sometimes have difficulty in establishing the name of the insurance undertaking providing insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles involved in an accident.
Oškodovanci, ki so v prometni nesreči z motornim vozilom utrpeli materialno škodo ali telesno poškodbo, imajo včasih težave z ugotavljanjem imena zavarovalnice, ki krije odgovornost za motorna vozila, udeležena v nesreči.
In the interests of such injured parties, Member States should set up information centres to ensure that such information concerning any accident involving a motor vehicle is made available promptly.
Države članice bi morale v interesu teh oškodovancev vzpostaviti informacijske centre in s tem zagotoviti, da so ustrezne informacije o nesrečah, ki jih je povzročilo motorno vozilo, na voljo pravočasno.
Those information centres should also make available to injured parties information concerning claims representatives.
Ti informacijski centri bi morali oškodovancem dati na voljo tudi informacije v zvezi s pooblaščenci za obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov.
It is necessary that such centres should cooperate with each other and respond rapidly to requests for information about claims representatives made by centres in other Member States.
Informacijski centri bi morali med seboj sodelovati in se hitro odzivati na prošnje, ki jih v zvezi z informacijami o pooblaščencih za obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov dajejo centri v drugih državah članicah.
It seems appropriate that such centres should collect information about the actual termination date of the insurance cover but not about the expiry of the original validity of the policy if the duration of the contract is extended owing to non-cancellation.
Vse kaže, da je primerno, da bi takšni centri zbirali informacije o datumih dejanskega prenehanja zavarovalnega kritja, ne pa informacij o izteku prvotne veljavnosti zavarovalne police, če je bilo trajanje pogodbe podaljšano molče.
Specific provision should be made with respect to vehicles (for example, government or military vehicles) which fall within the exemptions from the obligation to be insured against civil liability.
Sprejeti bi bilo treba posebne določbe glede vozil (recimo vozila državnih organov ali vojaška vozila), za katera ne velja obveznost zavarovanja avtomobilske odgovornosti.
The injured party may have a legitimate interest in being informed about the identity of the owner or usual driver or the registered keeper of the vehicle, for example if he can obtain compensation only from those persons because the vehicle is not duly insured or the damage exceeds the sum insured, in which event this information should also be provided.
Oškodovanec ima lahko upravičen interes, da izve identiteto lastnika ali običajnega voznika ali registriranega imetnika vozila; tako je treba recimo v primerih, v katerih lahko oškodovanec dobi odškodnino le od teh oseb, ker bodisi vozilo ni zavarovano skladno s predpisi bodisi škoda presega zavarovalno vsoto, dati na voljo omenjene informacije.
Certain information provided, such as the name and address of the owner or usual driver of the vehicle and the number of the insurance policy or the registration number of the vehicle, constitutes personal data within the meaning of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [13].
Nekatere dane informacije, kot so ime in naslov lastnika ali običajnega voznika vozila in številka zavarovalne police ali registrska številka vozila, predstavljajo osebne podatke glede na Direktivo 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov ter o prostem pretoku teh podatkov [13].
The processing of such data which is required for the purposes of this Directive should therefore comply with the national measures taken pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC.
Obdelava osebnih podatkov, ki je nujna za namene te direktive, bi morala biti skladna z nacionalnimi ukrepi, sprejetimi po Direktivi 95/46/ES.
The name and address of the usual driver should be communicated only if national legislation provides for such communication.
Ime in naslov običajnega voznika se sme sporočiti le, če to dovoljuje nacionalna zakonodaja.
In order to ensure that the injured party will not remain without the compensation to which he is entitled, it is necessary to make provision for a compensation body to which the injured party may apply where the insurance undertaking has failed to appoint a representative or is manifestly dilatory in settling a claim or where the insurance undertaking cannot be identified.
Da bi oškodovancu zagotovili odškodnino, do katere je upravičen, je treba zagotoviti odškodninski organ, na katerega se lahko obrne, če zavarovalnica ni imenovala pooblaščenca, če očitno zavlačuje z obravnavo ali če je ni mogoče identificirati.
The intervention of the compensation body should be limited to rare individual cases where the insurance undertaking has failed to comply with its duties in spite of the deterrent effect of the potential imposition of penalties.
Poseganje odškodninskega organa mora biti omejeno na redke posamezne primere, pri katerih zavarovalnica kljub zastraševalnemu učinku morebitnega izreka sankcij ni upoštevala svojih dolžnosti.
The role played by the compensation body is that of settling the claim in respect of any loss or injury suffered by the injured party only in cases which are capable of objective determination and therefore the compensation body should limit its activity to verifying that an offer of compensation has been made in accordance with the time limits and procedures laid down, without any assessment of the merits.
Ker ima odškodninski organ nalogo, da obravnava odškodninske zahtevke v zvezi z materialno škodo ali telesnimi poškodbami, ki jih je oškodovanec utrpel, le v objektivno določljivih primerih, bi moral omejiti svojo dejavnost na to, da preveri, ali je bila ponudba za odškodnino predložena v predpisanih rokih in skladno s predpisanimi postopki, pri čemer pa primera ne presoja vsebinsko.
Legal persons who are subrogated by law to the injured party in his claims against the person responsible for the accident or the latter’s insurance undertaking (such as, for example, other insurance undertakings or social security bodies) should not be entitled to present the corresponding claim to the compensation body.
Pravne osebe, na katere so po zakonu prešle oškodovančeve pravice do odškodnine proti povzročitelju nesreče ali njegovi zavarovalnici (recimo na druge zavarovalnice ali ustanove socialne varnosti), ne bi smeli biti upravičene do uveljavljanja ustreznega zahtevka za izplačilo škode pri odškodninskem organu.
The compensation body should have a right of subrogation in so far as it has compensated the injured party.
Odškodninski organ bi moral imeti pravico do subrogacije v tolikšnem obsegu, v kolikšnem je oškodovancu povrnil odškodnino.
In order to facilitate enforcement of the compensation body’s claim against the insurance undertaking where the latter has failed to appoint a claims representative or is manifestly dilatory in settling a claim, the body providing compensation in the injured party’s State should also enjoy an automatic right of reimbursement with subrogation to the rights of the injured party on the part of the corresponding body in the State where the insurance undertaking is established.
Da bi zagotovili uveljavitev zahtevka odškodninskega organa do zavarovalnice v primerih, ko slednja ni imenovala pooblaščenca za obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov ali ko očitno zavlačuje z obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov, bi moral imeti odškodninski organ v oškodovančevi državi avtomatsko tudi pravico do povračila, povezano z vstopom v pravice oškodovanca nasproti ustreznemu organu v državi, kjer ima zavarovalnica sedež.
This body is the best placed to institute proceedings for recourse against the insurance undertaking.
Ta organ je najbolj primeren, da predloži regresni zahtevek do zavarovalnice.
Even though Member States may provide that the claim against the compensation body is to be subsidiary, the injured person should not be obliged to present his claim to the person responsible for the accident before presenting it to the compensation body.
Čeprav države članice smejo določiti, da je zahtevek za izplačilo škode do odškodninskega organa lahko subsidiaren, oškodovanec ne bi smel biti prisiljen, da svoj zahtevek do povzročitelja nesreče uveljavlja prej, preden se z njim obrne na odškodninski organ.
In such a case the injured party should be in at least the same position as in the case of a claim against the guarantee fund.
V takem primeru bi morala biti položaj oškodovanca najmanj enaka kot pri zahtevku do škodnega sklada.
This system can be made to function by means of an agreement between the compensation bodies established or approved by the Member States, defining their functions and obligations and the procedures for reimbursement.
Ta sistem lahko začne delovati s sporazumom med odškodninskimi telesi ustanovljenimi in priznanimi v državah članicah, v katerem so opredeljene njihove naloge in obveznosti ter postopki glede povračil.
Where it is impossible to identify the insurer of a vehicle, it should be provided that the ultimate debtor in respect of the damages to be paid to the injured party is the guarantee fund provided for this purpose situated in the Member State where the uninsured vehicle, the use of which has caused the accident, is normally based.
Za primere, ko je nemogoče identificirati zavarovalca vozila, je treba predvideti, da je končni dolžnik v zvezi s plačilom odškodnine oškodovancu škodni sklad, opredeljen v ta namen, iz tiste države članice, v kateri je običajno nezavarovano vozilo, katerega uporaba je povzročila nesrečo.