natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to Mojo and Music Dome, the municipality will receive nothing if the investment does not generate additional income: it will recover its investment only if extra income is indeed generated.
Podjetji Mojo in Music Dome trdita, da občina ne bo ničesar prejela, če naložba ne bo ustvarila dodatnih prihodkov: svojo naložbo bo dobila povrnjeno le, če bo dejansko ustvarjen dodaten prihodek.
With regard to the argument put forward by Mojo and Music Dome here, the Commission cannot exclude the possibility that in its decision to invest in the project the municipality did not behave as a profit-maximising private investor.
V zvezi s to trditvijo podjetij Mojo in Music Dome Komisija ne more izključiti možnosti, da občina pri svoji odločitvi glede naložbe v projekt ni ravnala kot zasebni vlagatelj, ki želi ustvariti čim večji dobiček.
The conditions imposed on the operator regarding the multifunctionality of the complex and the types of events that are to take place there in effect reduce the value of the investment.
Pogoji, ki jih je določila za upravljavca, v zvezi z večnamenskostjo kompleksa in vrstami prireditev, ki bodo v njemu potekale, dejansko zmanjšujejo vrednost naložbe.
However, the Commission’s assessment has demonstrated that the operator did not receive any undue advantage from its contractual relationship with the municipality, taking into account the restrictions imposed in the contracts.
Ocena Komisije je kljub temu pokazala, da upravljavec zaradi svojega pogodbenega razmerja z občino ni pridobil nobene neupravičene prednosti, ob upoštevanju omejitev, določenih v pogodbah.
As explained above, the level of the rent and the price of the shares in Ahoy Rotterdam NV were in line with market conditions.
Kot je obrazloženo zgoraj, sta bili višina najemnine in cena delnic podjetja Ahoy Rotterdam N.V. v skladu s tržnimi pogoji.
The profit-sharing mechanism presents is an additional safeguard to rule out any potential undue advantage if the investment, rather than merely preserving value, were to generate additional value for the operator.
Mehanizem za udeležbo pri dobičku je dodatni zaščitni ukrep, da se prepreči neupravičena prednost, če naložba ne bi le ohranjala vrednosti, ampak bi tudi ustvarjala dodatno vrednost za upravljavca.
Accordingly, taking into account the uncertainty of the potential advantage to the operator resulting from the upgrading/expansion of the Ahoy Arena, as well as the effective safeguard in the form of the profit-sharing arrangement implemented by the municipality, the Commission concludes that the planned investment does not confer on the operator an economic advantage going beyond normal market conditions.
Zato Komisija ob upoštevanju negotovosti glede možne prednosti za upravljavca zaradi nadgradnje/razširitve stadiona Ahoy in učinkovitega zaščitnega ukrepa v obliki dogovora o udeležbi pri dobičku, ki ga je uveljavila občina, ugotavlja, da načrtovana naložba upravljavcu ne omogoča gospodarske prednosti, ki presega običajne tržne pogoje.
An economic advantage conferred on the undertaking carrying out the project
Gospodarska prednost podjetja, ki izvaja projekt
The Dutch authorities have given a commitment that the undertaking or undertakings carrying out the investment project will be selected by public tender in full compliance with Parliament and Council Directive 2004/18/EC [31].
Nizozemski organi so sprejeli obveznost, da bodo podjetje ali podjetja, ki izvajajo naložbeni projekt, izbrana na javnem razpisu, pri čemer so bodo v celoti upoštevale določbe iz Direktive 2004/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [31].
As it said in its decision to initiate the investigation procedure, if this commitment is met the Commission can rule out the possibility that an economic advantage going beyond normal market conditions might be conferred on any such undertaking or undertakings.
Kot je Komisija navedla v svoji odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka preiskave, lahko izloči možnost, da bi bila kateremu koli takemu podjetju ali podjetjem omogočena gospodarska prednost, ki presega običajne tržne pogoje, če je ta obveznost izpolnjena.
Economic advantage conferred on undertakings using the complex
Gospodarska prednost podjetij, ki uporabljajo kompleks
It must be concluded that the investment will not confer any economic advantage beyond normal market conditions on undertakings using the services provided by the operator of Ahoy.
Sklepati je treba, da naložba podjetjem, ki uporabljajo storitve upravljavca kompleksa Ahoy, ne bo omogočila nobene gospodarske prednosti, ki presega običajne tržne pogoje.
Since the investment is focused on the renovation and development of the Ahoy Arena, the undertakings concerned will be organisers of concerts, festivals, and sports and social events.
Ker je naložba osredotočena na obnovo in nadgradnjo stadiona Ahoy, bodo zadevna podjetja organizatorji koncertov, festivalov ter športnih in družabnih prireditev.
Given that the operator of the Ahoy complex is a private undertaking, there is no reason to doubt that its clients will be charged a market price.
Glede na to, da je upravljavec kompleksa Ahoy zasebno podjetje, ni razloga za dvom, da bo njegovim strankam zaračunana tržna cena.
Economic advantage conferred on specific economic activities
Gospodarska prednost posameznih gospodarskih dejavnosti
In the decision initiating the procedure, the Commission made an initial finding, on the basis of the information in its possession, that no selective advantage would be conferred on any specific undertaking or group of undertakings or on any specific activity, given the multipurpose layout of the complex and the obligations imposed on the operator in the lease regarding the nature and promotion of its multifunctional character.
Komisija je v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka na podlagi informacij, s katerimi je razpolagala, navedla prvotno ugotovitev, da nobeno posamezno podjetje ali skupina podjetij ali posamezna dejavnost ne bo deležna selektivne prednosti glede na večnamensko razporeditev kompleksa ter obveznosti upravljavca iz najemne pogodbe v zvezi z naravo in spodbujanjem njegove večnamenskosti.
The comments submitted by the Dutch authorities in the course of the investigation have confirmed the multifunctional nature of the Ahoy complex and the variety of activities carried on there.
Pripombe, ki so jih med preiskavo predložili nizozemski organi, potrjujejo večnamenskost kompleksa Ahoy in raznolikost dejavnosti, ki se v njem izvajajo.
The lease requires the operator to guarantee that the facility will continue to be available for different users and activities.
Najemna pogodba od upravljavca zahteva zagotovitev, da bo objekt še naprej na voljo različnim uporabnikom in dejavnostim.
The Commission would observe that the investment in the Ahoy Arena aims at maintaining the multifunctional character of the complex, so as to provide facilities for various types of activity which are not for the benefit of specific undertakings or specific activities.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je cilj naložbe v stadion Ahoy ohraniti večnamenskost kompleksa, da se zagotovijo objekti za različne vrste dejavnosti, ki ne dajejo prednosti posameznim podjetjem ali dejavnostim.
In addition, the investment in the Arena is intended to provide a venue at which activities will take place that are aimed at the general public.
Poleg tega je namen naložbe v stadion zagotoviti kraj, na katerem bodo potekale dejavnosti za širšo javnost.
The provision of a sports venue of this type can be regarded as a matter for which the authorities are responsible to the general public, provided its multifunctional character is maintained.
Zagotovitev športnega centra te vrste se lahko obravnava kot zadeva, v zvezi s katero so javni organi odgovorni širši javnosti, da se ohranja njegova večnamenskost.
In addition, there is nothing to suggest that with regard to other activities and events the Ahoy complex would not be operated on market terms.
Poleg tega nič na kaže na to, da se kompleks Ahoy v zvezi z drugimi dejavnostmi in prireditvami ne bi upravljal po tržnih pogojih.
The Commission takes the view, therefore, that the investment will not favour specific undertakings or economic activities, and is consequently not selective.
Zato Komisija meni, da naložba ne bo dajala prednosti posameznim podjetjem ali gospodarskim dejavnostim in torej ni selektivna.
Conclusion on economic advantage
Sklepna ugotovitev o gospodarski prednosti
The Commission accordingly finds that neither the planned investment in the Ahoy complex nor the related sale of the operation and lease of the Ahoy complex by the municipality confer an economic advantage going beyond normal market conditions on the operator of the complex or on any other undertaking.
V skladu s tem Komisija ugotavlja, da niti načrtovana naložba v kompleks Ahoy niti s tem povezani prodaja pravic do opravljanja dejavnosti in oddaja kompleksa Ahoy v najem s strani občine upravljavcu kompleksa ali kateremu koli drugemu podjetju ne bodo omogočile gospodarske prednosti, ki presega običajne tržne pogoje.
The Commission also finds that the investment does not selectively favour specific undertakings or economic activities.
Komisija prav tako ugotavlja, da naložba ne daje selektivne prednosti posameznim podjetjem ali gospodarskim dejavnostim.
OVERALL CONCLUSION
SPLOŠNA SKLEPNA UGOTOVITEV
Since the initiation of the formal investigation procedure, the doubts that the Commission expressed in the initiating decision have been addressed in a satisfactory manner by the Dutch authorities and the independent consultant.
Po sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave so nizozemski organi in neodvisni svetovalec ustrezno obravnavali dvome, ki jih je Komisija izrazila v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka.
In particular, further information has been provided with respect to the design of the profit-sharing arrangement, which has enabled the Commission to assess the mechanism in depth.
Zlasti so bile predložene dodatne informacije v zvezi z oblikovanjem dogovora o udeležbi pri dobičku, ki so Komisiji omogočile podrobno oceno mehanizma.
Furthermore, the Commission has assessed the reliability of the Deloitte valuations which served as a direct basis for the sale of the operation of Ahoy Rotterdam NV and the lease of the Ahoy complex, and has confirmed that these transactions were consistent with the market.
Poleg tega je Komisija ocenila zanesljivost vrednotenj podjetja Deloitte, ki so bila podlaga za prodajo pravic do opravljanja dejavnosti podjetja Ahoy Rotterdam N.V. in oddaje v najem kompleksa Ahoy, ter potrdila, da so bile te transakcije v skladu s trgom.
The Commission concludes, therefore, that neither the notified investment in the renovation and upgrading/expansion of the Ahoy complex, nor the related sale of the operation of Ahoy NV and lease of the complex, constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty,
Zato Komisija ugotavlja, da niti priglašena naložba v obnovo in nadgradnjo/razširitev kompleksa Ahoy niti z njo povezani prodaja pravic do opravljanja dejavnosti podjetja Ahoy N.V. in oddaja kompleksa v najem ne pomenijo državne pomoči v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES –
The investment by the municipality of Rotterdam in the Ahoy complex, notified to the Commission by letter of 22 February 2007, with subsequent amendments, does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Naložba občine Rotterdam v kompleks Ahoy, priglašena Komisiji z dopisom z dne 22. februarja 2007, s poznejšimi spremembami, ne pomeni državne pomoči v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
The measure may accordingly be implemented.
Zato se ukrep lahko izvede.
OJ C 68, 13.3.2008, p. 14.
UL C 68, 13.3.2008, str. 14.
In a letter sent and registered as outgoing mail on 30 May 2008.
Z dopisom, ki je bil poslan in evidentiran kot izhodna pošta 30. maja 2008.
By letter registered as incoming mail on 30 April 2008, following an extension of the deadline for comments on the Commission decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure.
Z dopisom, ki je bil evidentiran kot prejeta pošta 30. aprila 2008, po podaljšanju roka za pripombe v zvezi z odločitvijo Komisije o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave.
By letter registered as incoming mail on 21 April 2008, following an extension of the deadline for comments on the Commission decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure.
Z dopisom, ki je bil evidentiran kot prejeta pošta 21. aprila 2008, po podaljšanju roka za pripombe v zvezi z odločitvijo Komisije o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave.
By letter registered as incoming mail on 27 March 2008.
Z dopisom, ki je bil evidentiran kot prejeta pošta 27. marca 2008.
(The information omitted here is covered by the obligation of business secrecy).
[…] (*) ((*) Za izpuščene podatke velja obveznost varovanja poklicne skrivnosti.)
Under clause 4.1 of the lease, the programme carried out in years 2003/2004 and 2004/2005 (public and trade exhibitions, events etc.) is to be continued for the duration of the contract.
V skladu s klavzulo 4.1 najemne pogodbe se program, ki se je izvajal v letih 2003/2004 in 2004/2005 (javne in prodajne razstave, prireditve itd.), nadaljuje v času pogodbe.
The lease states that the rent is to be adjusted on the basis of the most recent monthly consumer price index published by the Central Statistical Office.
Najemna pogodba določa, da se najemnina prilagaja na podlagi najnovejšega mesečnega indeksa cen življenjskih potrebščin, ki ga objavlja Centralni statistični urad.
The comments submitted by the individual person were not directly relevant for the assessment of the measure, but focused instead on the motives behind the complaint lodged by Mojo and Music Dome.
Predložene pripombe posameznika niso bile neposredno pomembne za oceno ukrepa, ampak so se osredotočile na motive za pritožbo, ki sta jo vložili podjetji Mojo in Music Dome.
For this reason they are not considered further in this Decision.
Zato v tej odločbi niso nadalje obravnavane.
According to Ahoy Rotterdam NV, under the current plans maintenance and renovation accounted for 83 % of the cost of the investment, and the increase in capacity for 17 %.
Po navedbah podjetja Ahoy Rotterdam N.V. sta v okviru sedanjih načrtov vzdrževanje in obnova predstavljala 83 % stroškov naložbe, povečanje zmogljivosti pa 17 %.
Mojo and Music Dome referred to Annex 3 to the lease (years 2003/2004 and 2004/2005) and provided an overview for the period 2003/2004–2007/2008.
Podjetji Mojo in Music Dome sta se sklicevali na Prilogo 3 k najemni pogodbi (za leti 2003/2004 in 2004/2005) ter predložili pregled za obdobje 2003/2004–2007/2008.
The complainants submitted the calculations leading to this result.
Pritožnika sta predložila izračune, ki so vodili do tega rezultata.
They also provided other calculations using different multiples to show that if Deloitte had carried out an accurate forecast of the expected result for the financial year 2005/2006, the value of the company would have been considerably higher.
Predložila sta tudi druge izračune z različnimi večkratniki, da bi dokazala, da bi bila vrednost podjetja določena bistveno višje, če bi podjetje Deloitte točno napovedalo pričakovani rezultat za poslovno leto 2005/2006.
Examples being Europort Maritime, Industrial Maintenance and InfraTech.
Takšne prireditve so npr. Europort Maritime, Industrial Maintenance in InfraTech.
One report, entitled ‘Project Nadal’, valued the shares in Ahoy Rotterdam NV at EUR 1,7 million; the other, ‘Waardering Ahoy’, put the market level of rent for the Ahoy complex at EUR 2,6 million.
Eno poročilo z naslovom „Project Nadal“ je vrednost delnic podjetja Ahoy Rotterdam N.V. ocenilo na 1,7 milijona EUR; drugo, z naslovom „Waardering Ahoy“, je višino najemnine za kompleks Ahoy na tržni ravni ocenilo na 2,6 milijona EUR.
DZT’s ‘Taxatiereport’ valued the market level of rent for the Ahoy complex at EUR 3,9 million.
Poročilo podjetja DTZ „Taxatiereport“ je višino najemnine za kompleks Ahoy na tržni ravni ocenilo na 3,9 milijona EUR.
The consultant did not accept that the DTZ report provided a better indication, because in the consultant’s view the Ahoy complex could not be classed as ‘easily marketable’ ( goed courant) and the methods used by DTZ were based on unclear comparisons and less appropriate or less developed assumptions.
Svetovalec se ni strinjal z višjo vrednostjo v poročilu podjetja DTZ, ker po njegovem mnenju kompleksa Ahoy ni mogoče opredeliti kot kompleksa, ki ga je „enostavno tržiti“ (goed courant), ter ker so metode, ki jih je uporabilo podjetje DTZ, temeljile na nejasnih primerjavah in manj ustreznih ali manj razvitih predpostavkah.
The independent consultant’s report took account of the forecasting period, the dynamics of the events market, the possibility of new competitors and the related uncertainties and risks.
Poročilo neodvisnega svetovalca je upoštevalo obdobje napovedi, dinamiko trga za organizacijo prireditev, možnost novih konkurentov ter s tem povezanih negotovosti in tveganj.
The independent consultant also indicated that as a defensive strategy the renovation and expansion of the complex was not unique.
Neodvisni svetovalec je tudi navedel, da obnova in razširitev kompleksa nista edina defenzivna strategija.
The independent consultant also observed that it was reasonable for Deloitte to make use among other things of information provided by the management.
Neodvisni svetovalec je ugotovil, da je bilo razumljivo, da je podjetje Deloitte med drugim uporabilo informacije, ki jih je predložila uprava.
Deloitte had not relied on this information only, but also used independent market research.
Podjetje Deloitte se ni zanašalo le na te informacije, ampak je uporabilo tudi neodvisne tržne raziskave.
The discounted cash flow (DCF) method is a commonly used method of valuing a project, company or asset by calculating the present value of a future cash flow, taking into account both the risk and the time expected to elapse before the cash is received.
Metoda diskontiranega denarnega toka je pogosto uporabljena metoda za vrednotenje projekta, podjetja ali premoženja z izračunom sedanje vrednosti prihodnjega denarnega toka ob upoštevanju tveganja in časa, za katerega se pričakuje, da bo potekel, preden bo prejet denar.
The complainants argue that given that the valuation was carried out in the middle of the financial year 2005/2006, the forecast should have been more accurate.
Pritožnika trdita, da bi morale biti napovedi točnejše glede na to, da je bilo vrednotenje izvedeno v sredini poslovnega leta 2005/2006.
In particular the expansion of the capacity of the Arena by the addition of extra seats.
Zlasti razširitev zmogljivosti stadiona z dodatnimi sedeži.
This assumption was used in the Deloitte report determining a market rent for the Ahoy complex.
Ta predpostavka je bila uporabljena v poročilu podjetja Deloitte o določitvi tržne najemnine za kompleks Ahoy.
According to the independent consultant, Amsterdam RAI, for example, was investing up to EUR 105 million in upgrading its complex in the period 2003–2008.
Po besedah neodvisnega svetovalca je na primer Amsterdam RAI v obdobju 2003–2008 v nadgradnjo svojega kompleksa vložil do 105 milijonov EUR.
These gross margins are based on the assumption that the investment will only maintain the value of the complex to the operator, and will not produce additional revenues.
Te bruto marže temeljijo na predpostavki, da bo naložba le ohranila vrednost kompleksa za upravljavca in mu ne bo prinesla dodatnih prihodkov.
See recital 16.
Glej uvodno izjavo 16.
The additional rent is calculated as follows: 50 % × EUR 1,5 million + 35 % × EUR 3 million + 20 % × EUR 4 million = EUR 2,6 million.
Dodatna najemnina se izračuna na naslednji način: 50 % × 1,5 milijona EUR + 35 % × 3 milijoni EUR + 20 % × 4 milijoni EUR = 2,6 milijona EUR.
The independent consultant’s report confirms that it is reasonable to structure the mechanism in this fashion.
Poročilo neodvisnega svetovalca potrjuje, da je strukturiranje mehanizma na ta način smiselno.
The Dutch authorities submitted their comments on 20 June 2007.
Nizozemski organi so svoje pripombe predložili 20. junija 2007.
The Commission wrote to the Dutch authorities requesting additional information on 10 August and 16 November 2007.
Komisija je 10. avgusta in 16. novembra 2007 od nizozemskih organov pisno zahtevala dodatne informacije.
By letter of 28 February, the Dutch authorities requested an extension to 1 April 2008 of the deadline for an answer to the Commission’s initiating decision.
Nizozemski organi so z dopisom z dne 28. februarja zaprosili za podaljšanje roka za odgovor na odločitev Komisije o sprožitvi postopka do 1. aprila 2008.
The Commission agreed to this extension by letter sent and registered as outgoing mail on 12 March 2008.
Komisija je to podaljšanje odobrila z dopisom, ki je bil poslan in evidentiran kot izhodna pošta 12. marca 2008.
The non-confidential version of the report prepared by the independent consultant was forwarded to the Dutch authorities by letter registered as outgoing mail on 24 June 2008.
Različica poročila neodvisnega svetovalca, ki ni zaupna, je bila nizozemskim organom posredovana z dopisom, ki je bil evidentiran kot izhodna pošta 24. junija 2008.
The Dutch authorities commented in a letter registered as incoming mail on 14 July 2008.
Nizozemski organi so pripombe predložili z dopisom, ki je bil evidentiran kot prejeta pošta 14. julija 2008.
Following a decision to separate ownership and operations, the municipality kept the ownership of the complex, but on 1 July 2006 sold the operation of Ahoy Rotterdam NV, via a management buy-out, for EUR 1,7 million. In the absence of a public tender, the sale price was based directly on a market valuation performed by the independent consultant, Deloitte Financial Advisory Services BV, Real Estate Valuation in Rotterdam (Deloitte).
Občina je po odločitvi o ločitvi lastništva in opravljanja dejavnosti ostala lastnica kompleksa, vendar je 1. julija 2006 v okviru menedžerskega odkupa pravico do opravljanja dejavnosti podjetja Ahoy Rotterdam N.V. prodala za 1,7 milijona EUR. Ker ni bilo javnega razpisa, je prodajna cena temeljila neposredno na tržnem vrednotenju, ki ga je izvedel neodvisni svetovalec, podjetje Deloitte Financial Advisory Services BV, Real Estate Valuation v Rotterdamu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: podjetje Deloitte).
At the same time, the municipality leased the Ahoy complex to the now privatised Ahoy Rotterdam NV for a period of 15 years (with an option for extension), starting on 1 July 2006.
Hkrati je občina kompleks Ahoy oddala v najem zdaj privatiziranemu podjetju Ahoy Rotterdam N.V. za obdobje 15 let (z možnostjo podaljšanja), ki se je začelo 1. julija 2006.
The lease imposed strict obligations on the lessee regarding the preservation and promotion of the multifunctional nature of the Ahoy complex [8].
Z oddajo v najem so se najemojemalcu naložile stroge obveznosti v zvezi z ohranitvijo in spodbujanjem večnamenskosti kompleksa Ahoy [8].
As part of the lease, the municipality committed to invest up to EUR 42 million in the renovation and upgrading/expansion of the Ahoy Arena. This investment is the subject of the project notified.
V okviru najemne pogodbe se je občina Rotterdam zavezala, da bo v obnovo in nadgradnjo/razširitev stadiona vložila do 42 milijonov EUR. Ta naložba je predmet priglašenega projekta.
This surcharge would be due if the gross margin, less the rent payable for the relevant year, exceeded EUR 16,5 million. The surcharge would be determined in accordance with the following table:
To doplačilo bi bilo potrebno, če bi bruto marža brez najemnine, plačane za zadevno leto, presegla 16,5 milijona EUR. Doplačilo bi se določilo v skladu z naslednjo preglednico:
The municipality of Rotterdam plans to invest up to EUR 42 million in the renovation and expansion of the Ahoy Arena, which forms part of the Ahoy complex. Since a municipality is a public authority, the investment must be considered an investment using State resources within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Občina Rotterdam namerava v obnovo in razširitev stadiona Ahoy, ki je del kompleksa Ahoy, vložiti do 42 milijonov EUR. Ker je občina javni organ, se mora naložba v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES šteti kot naložba, ki uporablja državna sredstva.