natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
That objective is to be achieved by preventing and combating crime through closer cooperation between law enforcement authorities in the Member States, while respecting the principles and rules relating to human rights, fundamental freedoms and the rule of law on which the Union is founded and which are common to the Member States.
Ta cilj je treba doseči s preprečevanjem kaznivih dejanj in bojem proti njim na podlagi tesnejšega sodelovanja med organi kazenskega pregona v državah članicah, pri čemer se spoštujejo načela in pravila v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami, temeljnimi svoboščinami in pravno državo, na katerih temelji Unija in so skupna državam članicam.
Exchange of information and intelligence on crime and criminal activities is crucial for the possibility for law enforcement authorities to successfully prevent, detect and investigate crime or criminal activities.
Izmenjava informacij in obveščevalnih podatkov o kaznivih dejanjih ali kriminalni dejavnosti je ključnega pomena, da lahko organi kazenskega pregona uspešno odkrivajo, preprečujejo in preiskujejo kazniva dejanja ali kriminalne dejavnosti.
Common action in the field of police cooperation under Article 30(1)(a) of the Treaty entails the need to process relevant information which should be subject to appropriate provisions on the protection of personal data.
Skupni ukrepi na področju policijskega sodelovanja v skladu s členom 30(1)(a) Pogodbe pomenijo, da je potrebna obdelava ustreznih informacij, ki bi morala biti urejena z ustreznimi določbami o varstvu osebnih podatkov.
The intensified exchange of information regarding forensic evidence and the increased use of evidence from one Member State in the judicial processes of another, highlights the need to establish common standards for forensic service providers.
Zaradi bolj intenzivne izmenjave informacij o forenzičnih dokazih in večje uporabe dokazov iz ene države članice v sodnih postopkih v drugi državi članici je treba določiti skupne standarde za izvajalce forenzičnih dejavnosti.
Information originating from forensic processes in one Member State may currently be associated with a level of uncertainty in another Member State regarding the way in which an item has been handled, what methods have been used and how the results have been interpreted.
Za informacije, pridobljene v forenzičnih postopkih v eni državi članici, lahko trenutno obstaja v drugi državi članici določena stopnja negotovosti glede obravnavanja kako je bil uporabljen določeni predmet, uporabljenih metod in interpretiranja rezultatov.
In point 3.4 (h) of the Council and Commission Action Plan implementing The Hague Programme on strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union [2] Member States stressed the need for a definition of the quality standards of forensic laboratories by 2008.
Države članice so v točki 3.4(h) Akcijskega načrta Sveta in Komisije o izvajanju Haaškega programa za krepitev svobode, varnosti in pravice v Evropski uniji [2] poudarile, da je treba do leta 2008 opredeliti standarde kakovosti sodnomedicinskih laboratorijev.
It is particularly important to introduce common standards for forensic service providers relating to such sensitive personal data as DNA profiles and dactyloscopic data.
Posebej pomembno je uvesti skupne standarde za izvajalce forenzičnih dejavnosti v zvezi z občutljivimi osebnimi podatki, kot so profili DNK in daktiloskopski podatki.
Pursuant to Article 7(4) of Council Decision 2008/616/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the implementation of Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime [3], Member States shall take the necessary measures to guarantee the integrity of DNA profiles made available or sent for comparison to other Member States and to ensure that these measures comply with international standards, such as EN ISO/IEC 17025 ‘General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories’ (hereinafter ‘EN ISO/IEC 17025’).
V skladu s členom 7(4) Sklepa Sveta 2008/616/PNZ z dne 23. junija 2008 o izvajanju Sklepa 2008/615/PNZ o poglobitvi čezmejnega sodelovanja, zlasti na področju boja proti terorizmu in čezmejnemu kriminalu [3] sprejmejo države članice potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev integritete profilov DNK, do katerih so omogočile dostop drugim državam članicam ali so jim jih poslale za primerjavo, in zagotovijo skladnost teh ukrepov z mednarodnimi standardi, denimo z EN ISO/IEC 17025 – „Splošne zahteve za usposobljenost preskuševalnih in kalibracijskih laboratorijev“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: „EN ISO/IEC 17025“).
DNA profiles and dactyloscopic data are not only used in criminal proceedings but are also crucial for the identification of victims, particularly after disasters.
Profili DNK in daktiloskopski podatki se ne uporabljajo le v kazenskih postopkih, ampak so izjemno pomembni tudi pri ugotavljanju identitete žrtev, zlasti po katastrofah.
The accreditation of forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities is an important step towards a safer and more effective exchange of forensic information within the Union.
Akreditacija izvajalcev forenzičnih dejavnosti, ki opravljajo laboratorijske dejavnosti, je pomemben korak k varnejši in učinkovitejši izmenjavi forenzičnih informacij v Uniji.
Accreditation is granted by the national accreditation body which has exclusive competence to assess if a laboratory meets the requirements set by harmonised standards.
Akreditacijo podeli nacionalni akreditacijski organ, ki ima izključno pristojnost, da oceni, ali laboratorij izpolnjuje zahteve, določene na podlagi usklajenih standardov.
An accreditation body derives its authority from the State.
Akreditacijski organ dela v skladu s pooblastili, ki mu jih dodeli država.
Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products [4] contains detailed provisions on the competence of such national accreditation bodies.
Uredba (ES) št. 765/2008 Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. julija 2008 o določitvi zahtev za akreditacijo in nadzor trga v zvezi s trženjem proizvodov [4] vsebuje natančne določbe o pristojnostih nacionalnih akreditacijskih organov.
Inter alia, Article 7 of that Regulation regulates cross-border accreditation in cases where accreditation may be requested from another national accreditation body.
Med drugimi člen 7 navedene uredbe ureja čezmejno akreditacijo v primerih, ko za akreditacijo lahko zaprosi drug nacionalni akreditacijski organ.
The absence of an agreement to apply a common accreditation standard for the analysis of scientific evidence is a deficiency that should be remedied; it is, therefore, necessary to adopt a legally binding instrument on the accreditation of all forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities.
Sporazum o uporabi skupnega akreditacijskega standarda za analizo znanstvenih dokazov še ne obstaja, kar je pomanjkljivost, ki bi jo bilo treba odpraviti; zato je treba sprejeti pravno zavezujoč instrument o akreditaciji vseh izvajalcev forenzičnih dejavnosti, ki opravljajo laboratorijske dejavnosti.
Accreditation offers the necessary guarantees that laboratory activities are performed in accordance with relevant international standards, in particular EN ISO/IEC 17025, as well as relevant applicable guidelines.
Z akreditacijo je zagotovljeno, da so laboratorijske dejavnosti izvedene v skladu z ustreznimi mednarodnimi standardi, zlasti EN ISO/IEC 17025, ter v skladu z ustreznimi veljavnimi smernicami.
An accreditation standard allows any Member State to require, if it wishes, complementary standards in laboratory activities within its national jurisdiction.
Akreditacijski standard vsaki državi članici omogoča, da na lastno željo v svoji nacionalni zakonodaji zahteva izpolnjevanje dopolnilnih standardov pri laboratorijskih dejavnostih.
Accreditation will help establish mutual trust in the validity of the basic analytic methods used.
Akreditacija bo pomagala vzpostaviti medsebojno zaupanje v veljavnost osnovnih analitičnih metod, ki se uporabljajo.
However, accreditation does not state which method to use, only that the method used has to be suitable for its purpose.
Vendar pa akreditacija ne določa, katera metoda se mora uporabiti; navaja le, da mora uporabljena metoda ustrezati svojemu namenu.
Any measure taken outside a laboratory is beyond the scope of this Framework Decision.
Vsak ukrep, ki je sprejet izven laboratorija, ne sodi v področje uporabe tega okvirnega sklepa.
For example, the taking of dactyloscopic data or measures taken at the scene of incident, the scene of crime or forensic analyses carried out outside laboratories are not included in its scope.
V področje uporabe tega okvirnega sklepa na primer ni vključeno jemanje daktiloskopskih podatkov, kakor tudi ukrepi, sprejeti na kraju dogodka, ali kraju kaznivega dejanja, ali forenzične analize, opravljene zunaj laboratorija.
This Framework Decision does not aim to harmonise national rules regarding the judicial assessment of forensic evidence.
Namen tega okvirnega sklepa ni uskladiti nacionalna pravila glede sodne presoje forenzičnih dokazov.
This Decision does not affect the validity, established in accordance with national applicable rules, of the results of laboratory activities carried out prior to its implementation, even if the forensic service provider was not accredited to comply with EN ISO/IEC 17025,
Ta sklep ne vpliva na veljavnost rezultatov laboratorijskih dejavnosti, opravljenih pred njegovim izvajanjem, če je bila veljavnost ugotovljena v skladu z veljavnimi nacionalnimi pravili, tudi če izvajalec forenzičnih dejavnosti ni bil akreditiran kot ustrezen EN ISO/IEC 17025 –
The purpose of this Framework Decision is to ensure that the results of laboratory activities carried out by accredited forensic service providers in one Member State are recognised by the authorities responsible for the prevention, detection and investigation of criminal offences as being equally reliable as the results of laboratory activities carried out by forensic service providers accredited to EN ISO/IEC 17025 within any other Member State.
Namen tega okvirnega sklepa je zagotoviti, da organi, pristojni za preprečevanje, odkrivanje in preiskovanje kaznivih dejanj, priznajo rezultate laboratorijskih dejavnosti, ki jih opravijo izvajalci forenzičnih dejavnosti v eni državi članici, za enako zanesljive kot rezultate laboratorijskih dejavnosti, ki jih opravijo izvajalci forenzičnih dejavnosti, akreditiranih po EN ISO/IEC 17025 v vseh drugih državah članicah.
This purpose is achieved by ensuring that forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities are accredited by a national accreditation body as complying with EN ISO/IEC 17025.
V ta namen nacionalni akreditacijski organ akreditira izvajalce forenzičnih dejavnosti, ki opravljajo laboratorijske dejavnosti, kot skladne z EN ISO/IEC 17025.
This Framework Decision shall apply to laboratory activities resulting in:
Ta okvirni sklep se uporablja za laboratorijske dejavnosti, katerih rezultat so:
DNA-profile; and
profil DNK; in
dactyloscopic data.
daktiloskopski podatki.
‘laboratory activity’ means any measure taken in a laboratory when locating and recovering traces on items, as well as developing, analysing and interpreting forensic evidence, with a view to providing expert opinions or exchanging forensic evidence;
„laboratorijska dejavnost“ pomeni vse ukrepe, sprejete v laboratoriju pri lokalizaciji in pridobivanju sledi na predmetih, pa tudi pri pripravi, analizi in interpretaciji forenzičnih dokazov zaradi priprave izvedenskega mnenja ali izmenjave forenzičnih dokazov;
‘results of laboratory activities’ means any analytical outputs and directly associated interpretation;
„rezultati laboratorijskih dejavnosti“ pomenijo vse analitične ugotovitve in z njimi neposredno povezane interpretacije;
‘forensic service provider’ means any organisation, public or private, that carries out forensic laboratory activities at the request of competent law enforcement or judicial authorities;
„izvajalec forenzičnih dejavnosti“ pomeni vsako javno ali zasebno organizacijo, ki opravlja forenzične laboratorijske dejavnosti na zahtevo pristojnih organov kazenskega pregona ali pristojnih sodnih organov;
‘national accreditation body’ means the sole body in a Member State that performs accreditation with authority derived from the State as referred to in Regulation (EC) No 765/2008;
„nacionalni akreditacijski organ“ pomeni edini organ v državi članici, ki podeljuje akreditacijo v skladu s pooblastili, ki mu jih dodeli država v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 765/2008;
‘DNA-profile’ means a letter or number code which represents a set of identification characteristics of the non-coding part of an analysed human DNA sample, i.e. the particular molecular structure at the various DNA locations (loci);
„profil DNK“ pomeni črkovno ali številčno kodo, ki predstavlja niz razločevalnih značilnosti nekodirajočega dela analiziranega vzorca človeške DNK, tj. posebno molekularno strukturo različnih področij DNK (lokusov);
‘dactyloscopic data’ means fingerprint images, images of fingerprint latents, palm prints, palm print latents and templates of such images (coded minutiae).
„daktiloskopski podatki“ pomenijo prstne odtise, sledi prstnih odtisov, odtise dlani, sledi odtisov dlani in template (vzorce) takšnih podob (kodirane minucije).
Member States shall ensure that their forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities are accredited by a national accreditation body as complying with EN ISO/IEC 17025.
Države članice zagotovijo, da je njihove izvajalce forenzičnih dejavnosti, ki opravljajo laboratorijske dejavnosti, akreditiral nacionalni akreditacijski organ kot skladne z EN ISO/IEC 17025.
Recognition of results
Priznanje rezultatov
Each Member State shall ensure that the results of accredited forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities in other Member States are recognised by its authorities responsible for the prevention, detection, and investigation of criminal offences as being equally reliable as the results of domestic forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities accredited to EN ISO/IEC 17025.
Vsaka država članica zagotovi, da njeni organi, pristojni za preprečevanje, odkrivanje in preiskovanje kaznivih dejanj, priznajo rezultate akreditiranih izvajalcev forenzičnih dejavnosti, ki opravljajo laboratorijske dejavnosti v drugih državah članicah, za enako zanesljive kot rezultate domačih izvajalcev forenzičnih dejavnosti, ki opravljajo laboratorijske dejavnosti, akreditiranih po EN ISO/IEC 17025.
This Framework Decision does not affect national rules on the judicial assessment of evidence.
Ta okvirni sklep ne vpliva na nacionalna pravila glede sodne presoje dokazov.
Each Member State shall bear any public costs resulting from this Framework Decision in accordance with national arrangements.
Vsaka država članica v skladu z nacionalnimi predpisi plača vse javne stroške, ki so nastali na podlagi tega okvirnega sklepa.
The Commission shall examine the means to provide financial support from the general budget of the European Union for national and transnational projects intended to contribute to the implementation of this Framework Decision, inter alia for the exchange of experience, dissemination of know-how and proficiency testing.
Komisija preuči načine za zagotovitev finančne podpore iz splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za nacionalne in čeznacionalne projekte, katerih namen je prispevati k izvajanju tega okvirnega sklepa, med drugim za izmenjavo izkušenj, razširjanje znanja in preverjanje usposobljenosti.
Member States shall take the necessary steps to comply with the provisions of this Framework Decision in relation to DNA-profiles by 30 November 2013.
Države članice sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za uskladitev z določbami tega okvirnega sklepa v zvezi s profili DNK v 30. novembra 2013.
Member States shall take the necessary steps to comply with the provisions of this Framework Decision in relation to dactyloscopic data by 30 November 2015.
Države članice sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za uskladitev z določbami tega okvirnega sklepa v zvezi z daktiloskopskimi podatki v 30. novembra 2015.
Member States shall forward to the General Secretariat of the Council and to the Commission the text of the provisions transposing into their national laws the obligations imposed on them under this Framework Decision by 30 May 2016 at the latest.
Države članice najkasneje do 30. maja 2016 pošljejo generalnemu sekretariatu Sveta in Komisiji besedila določb predpisov, ki v nacionalno zakonodajo prenašajo obveznosti iz tega okvirnega sklepa.
On the basis of the information referred to in paragraph 3 and other information provided by the Member States on request, the Commission shall, before 1 July 2018, submit a report to the Council on the implementation and application of this Framework Decision.
Na podlagi informacij iz odstavka 3, ki jih države članice posredujejo na zahtevo, Komisija pred 1. julijem 2018 Svetu predloži poročilo o izvajanju in uporabi tega okvirnega sklepa.
The Council shall, by the end of 2018, assess the extent to which Member States have complied with this Framework Decision.
Svet do konca leta 2018 oceni, v kolikšnem obsegu države članice upoštevajo ta okvirni sklep.
This Framework Decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta okvirni sklep začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
OJ C 174, 28.7.2009, p. 7.
UL C 174, 28.7.2009, str.7.
Council Framework Decision 2009/948/JHA
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2009/948/PNZ
on prevention and settlement of conflicts of exercise of jurisdiction in criminal proceedings
o preprečevanju in reševanju sporov o izvajanju pristojnosti v kazenskih postopkih
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(1)(c) and (d) and Article 34(2)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti člena 31(1)(c) in (d) ter člena 34(2)(b) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the initiative of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and of the Kingdom of Sweden,
ob upoštevanju Pobude Češke republike, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije, Slovaške republike in Kraljevine Švedske,
The European Union has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice.
(1) Evropska unija si je za cilj postavila vzdrževanje in razvijanje območja svobode, varnosti in pravice.
The Hague Programme [1] on strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union, which was approved by the European Council at its meeting on 4 and 5 November 2004, requires Member States to consider legislation on conflicts of jurisdiction, with a view to increasing the efficiency of prosecutions while guaranteeing the proper administration of justice, so as to complete the comprehensive programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters.
Haaški program [1] o krepitvi svobode, varnosti in pravice v Evropski uniji, ki je bil odobren na zasedanju Evropskega sveta 4. in 5. novembra 2004, od držav članic zahteva, da preučijo zakonodajo glede sporov o pristojnosti zaradi povečanja učinkovitosti sodnih pregonov in hkrati zagotovijo pravično sojenje, da bi zaključili celovit program ukrepov za izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja sodnih odločb v kazenskih zadevah.
The measures provided for in this Framework Decision should aim to prevent situations where the same person is subject to parallel criminal proceedings in different Member States in respect of the same facts, which might lead to the final disposal of those proceedings in two or more Member States.
Cilj ukrepov iz tega okvirnega sklepa bi moral biti preprečitev primerov, ko zoper isto osebo na podlagi istih dejstev poteka vzporedni kazenski postopek v različnih državah članicah, kar lahko povzroči pravnomočno odločbo v postopku v dveh ali več državah članicah.
The Framework Decision therefore seeks to prevent an infringement of the principle of ‘ne bis in idem’, as set out in Article 54 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders [2] as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Communities.
Namen okvirnega sklepa je tako preprečevanje kršitve načela „ne bis in idem“, kakor je določeno v členu 54 Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma z dne 14. junija 1985 med vladami držav Gospodarske unije Beneluks, Zvezne republike Nemčije in Francoske republike o postopni odpravi kontrol na skupnih mejah [2], kakor ga razlaga Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti.
There should be direct consultations between competent authorities of the Member States with the aim of achieving a consensus on any effective solution aimed at avoiding the adverse consequences arising from parallel proceedings and avoiding waste of time and resources of the competent authorities concerned.
Obstajati bi moralo neposredno posvetovanje med pristojnimi organi držav članic, z namenom doseči soglasje o učinkoviti rešitvi, da bi se izognili škodljivim posledicam vzporednih postopkov in izgubi časa ter sredstev zadevnih pristojnih organov.
Such effective solution could notably consist in the concentration of the criminal proceedings in one Member State, for example through the transfer of criminal proceedings.
Taka učinkovita rešitev bi lahko predstavljala koncentracijo kazenskih postopkov v eni državi članici, na primer s prenosom kazenskih postopkov.
It could also consist in any other step allowing efficient and reasonable handling of those proceedings, including concerning the allocation in time, for example through a referral of the case to Eurojust when the competent authorities are not able to reach consensus.
Lahko bi tudi predstavljala kateri koli drug korak, ki bi omogočal učinkovito in razumno vodenje postopka, tudi glede časovne dodelitve postopka, kot na primer odstop zadeve Eurojustu, v primeru, da pristojni organi ne morejo doseči soglasja.
In this respect, specific attention should be paid to the issue of gathering the evidence which can be influenced by the parallel proceedings being conducted.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba posebno pozornost nameniti vprašanju zbiranja dokazov, na kar lahko vpliva vodenje vzporednih postopkov.
When a competent authority in a Member State has reasonable grounds to believe that parallel criminal proceedings are being conducted in another Member State in respect of the same facts involving the same person, which could lead to the final disposal of those proceedings in two or more Member States, it should contact the competent authority of that other Member State.
Če pristojni organ v državi članici utemeljeno domneva, da se vodi vzporedni kazenski postopek v drugi državi članici na podlagi istih dejstev zoper isto osebo, kar bi lahko povzročilo pravnomočno odločbo v postopku v dveh ali več državah članicah, bi moral zadevni organ vzpostaviti stik s pristojnim organom v drugi državi članici.
The question whether or not reasonable grounds exist should be examined solely by the contacting authority.
Vprašanje, ali utemeljena domneva obstaja ali ne, bi moral preučiti izključno organ, ki vzpostavi stik.