natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The investigation of dumping covered the period from 1 April 2006 – 30 September 2007 (review investigation period or RIP).
Preiskava dampinga je zajela obdobje od 1. aprila 2006 do 30. septembra 2007 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“).
The questionnaire response indicated a number of export sales transactions which were identical to the information submitted in the application for the review and which were allegedly destined for the Community.
V izpolnjenem vprašalniku je bilo navedenih več izvoznih transakcij, ki so bile v skladu z informacijami v zahtevku za pregled in so bile domnevno namenjene v Skupnost.
The investigation showed that the applicant did not directly export the product concerned (defined in section 2.3 above) during the RIP.
Preiskava je pokazala, da vložnik ni neposredno izvažal zadevnega izdelka (opredeljenega v oddelku 2.3) med obdobjem preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
The export transactions were in fact made by an independent trader in the PRC, to which the applicant issued a domestic invoice.
Izvozne transakcije je dejansko izvajal neodvisni trgovec v Ljudski republiki Kitajski, kateremu je vložnik izdal račun.
The applicant could only provide customs declaration forms which showed that the goods were exported from the PRC but which did not indicate the export destination.
Vložnik je lahko predložil le obrazce carinske deklaracije, iz katerih je bilo razvidno, da je bilo blago izvoženo iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ni pa bil naveden namembni kraj izvoza.
A further investigation was carried out at the premises of this trader in order to obtain and verify the necessary evidence of the alleged exports to the Community.
V prostorih tega trgovca je bila izvedena nadaljnja preiskava za pridobitev in preveritev potrebnih dokazov domnevnega izvoza v Skupnost.
The verification of the export documentation did not show that the goods had been released for free circulation in the Community.
Preverjanje izvozne dokumentacije ni pokazalo, da je bilo blago sproščeno v prosti promet v Skupnosti.
The goods were unloaded in two Community ports, but the invoices were addressed to a customer located in a third country outside the Community.
Blago je bilo raztovorjeno v dveh pristaniščih Skupnosti, toda računi so bili naslovljeni na stranko s sedežem v tretji državi zunaj Skupnosti.
The trader confirmed that the final destination of the goods was outside the Community, where the final customer was located.
Trgovec je potrdil, da je bil končni namembni kraj blaga zunaj Skupnosti, kjer je bil sedež končne stranke.
Eurostat import statistics of tartaric acid were also analysed.
Prav tako je bila analizirana Eurostatova statistika uvoza vinske kisline.
The analysis of the import statistics confirmed that the goods exported by the applicant were not released for free circulation within the Community.
Analiza statistike uvoza je potrdila, da blago, ki ga je izvažal vložnik, ni bilo sproščeno v prosti promet v Skupnosti.
On the basis of the above findings, it was concluded that the applicant could not demonstrate that it met the criteria for being considered a new exporter within the meaning of Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenih ugotovitev je bilo sklenjeno, da vložnik ne more dokazati, da izpolnjuje merila, v skladu s katerimi bi ga bilo mogoče obravnavati kot novega izvoznika v smislu člena 11(4) osnovne uredbe.
The purpose of the present review was to determine the individual margin of dumping of the applicant, which was allegedly different from the current residual margin applicable to imports of the product concerned from the PRC.
Namen sedanjega pregleda je določiti individualno stopnjo dampinga za vložnika, ki se je domnevno razlikovala od preostale stopnje, ki se trenutno uporablja za uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
The request was mainly based on the allegation that the applicant had started to export tartaric acid to the Community after the end of the investigation period of the original investigation and that it had such exports to the Community during the RIP.
Zahtevek je temeljil predvsem na domnevi, da je vložnik začel izvažati vinsko kislino v Skupnost po koncu obdobja prvotne preiskave in da jo je izvažal v Skupnost med obdobjem preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
The investigation concluded that, in the absence of exports to the Community during the RIP, the Commission could not establish that the applicant’s individual dumping margin was indeed different from the residual dumping margin established in the original investigation.
Sklep preiskave je bil, da Komisija v odsotnosti izvoza v Skupnost med obdobjem preiskave v zvezi s pregledom ne more ugotoviti, ali se je vložnikova individualna stopnja dampinga dejansko razlikovala od preostale stopnja dampinga, ugotovljene v prvotni preiskavi.
Therefore, the request made by the applicant should be rejected and the new exporter review terminated.
Zato je treba zahtevek vložnika zavrniti, pregled glede novega izvoznika pa zaključiti.
The residual anti-dumping duty found during the original investigation, i.e. 34,9 %, should consequently be maintained as far as the applicant is concerned.
Preostalo protidampinško dajatev v višini 34,9 %, ugotovljeno v prvotni preiskavi, je zato v zvezi z vložnikom treba ohraniti.
In the light of the above findings, the anti-dumping duty applicable to the applicant shall be levied retroactively on imports of the product concerned, which have been made subject to registration pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1406/2007.
Glede na zgornje ugotovitve se protidampinška dajatev, ki velja za vložnika, retroaktivno obračuna za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, za katerega velja registracija v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 1406/2007.
The applicant, the Community industry and the representatives of the exporting country were informed of the essential facts and considerations leading to the above conclusions and were given an opportunity to comment.
Vložnik, industrija Skupnosti in predstavniki države izvoznice so bili obveščeni o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, ki vodijo do zgoraj navedenih sklepov, dana pa jim je bila tudi možnost, da predložijo pripombe.
No comments which were of a nature to change the above conclusions were received.
Prejeta ni bila nobena pripomba, zaradi katere bi se spremenili zgoraj navedeni sklepi.
This review does not affect the date on which the measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 130/2006, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 150/2008, will expire pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation,
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe ta pregled ne vpliva na datum izteka veljavnosti ukrepov, uvedenih z Uredbo (ES) št. 130/2006, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 150/2008 –
The new exporter review initiated by Regulation (EC) 1406/2007 is hereby terminated and the anti-dumping duty applicable, according to Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 130/2006, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 150/2008, to ‘all other companies’ in the People’s Republic of China is hereby imposed on imports identified in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1406/2007.
Pregled glede novega izvoznika, začet z Uredbo (ES) 1406/2007, se zaključi, protidampinška dajatev, ki se v skladu s členom 1 Uredbe (ES) št. 130/2006, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 150/2008, uporablja za „vse druge družbe“ v Ljudski republiki Kitajski, pa se uvede za uvoz, opredeljen v členu 1 Uredbe (ES) št. 1406/2007.
The anti-dumping duty applicable, according to Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 130/2006, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 150/2008, to ‘all other companies’ in the People’s Republic of China is hereby levied with effect from 1 December 2007 on imports of tartaric acid which have been registered pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1406/2007.
Protidampinška dajatev, ki se v skladu s členom 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 130/2006, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 150/2008, uporablja za „vse druge družbe“ v Ljudski republiki Kitajski, se z učinkom od 1. decembra 2007 obračuna za uvoz vinske kisline, ki je bil registriran v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 1406/2007.
The customs authorities are hereby directed to cease the registration carried out pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1406/2007.
Carinskim organom se dajo navodila, da prenehajo z registracijo, ki se izvaja v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 1406/2007.
Unless otherwise specified, the provisions in force concerning customs duties shall apply.
Uporabljajo se veljavne določbe o carinskih dajatvah, če ni določeno drugače.
OJ L 48, 22.2.2008, p. 1.
UL L 48, 22.2.2008, str. 1.
OJ L 312, 30.11.2007, p. 12.
UL L 312, 30.11.2007, str. 12.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 728/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 728/2008
This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 July 2008.
Ta uredba začne veljati 29. julija 2008.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 729/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 729/2008
entering certain designations in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (Czwórniak (TSG), Dwójniak (TSG), Półtorak (TSG), Trójniak (TSG))
o vpisu nekaterih imen v Register zajamčenih tradicionalnih posebnosti (Czwórniak (ZTP), Dwójniak (ZTP), Półtorak (ZTP), Trójniak (ZTP))
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 of 20 March 2006 on agricultural products and foodstuffs as traditional specialities guaranteed [1], and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 9(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 509/2006 z dne 20. marca 2006 o zajamčenih tradicionalnih posebnostih kmetijskih proizvodov in živil [1] ter zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 9(4) Uredbe,
In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006, and pursuant to Article 19(3) of the same Regulation, Poland’s applications to enter the designations ‘Czwórniak’, ‘Dwójniak’, ‘Półtorak’ and ‘Trójniak’ in the register was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 8(2) in členom 19(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 509/2006 so bile vloge Poljske za registracijo imen „Czwórniak“, „Dwójniak“, „Półtorak“ in „Trójniak“ objavljene v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
As no objection under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has been received by the Commission, these names should be entered in the register.
Ker Komisija ni prejela nobenega ugovora v skladu s členom 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 509/2006, je treba navedena imena registrirati.
Protection as referred to in Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has not been requested,
Zaščita, kot jo navaja člen 13(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 509/2006, ni bila zahtevana –
The names in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby entered in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed.
Imena iz Priloge k tej uredbi se registrirajo.
OJ C 266, 8.11.2007, p. 27, corrected in OJ C 83, 2.4.2008, p. 10 (Czwórniak), OJ C 268, 10.11.2007, p. 22, corrected in OJ C 43, 16.2.2008, p. 37 (Dwójniak), OJ C 267, 9.11.2007, p. 40, corrected in OJ C 83, 2.4.2008, p. 10 (Półtorak), OJ C 265, 7.11.2007, p. 29, corrected in OJ C 83, 2.4.2008, p. 10 (Trójniak).
UL C 266, 8.11.2007, str. 27, kakor je bila popravljena v UL C 83, 2.4.2008, str. 10 (Czwórniak), UL C 268, 10.11.2007, str. 22, kakor je bila popravljena v UL C 43, 16.2.2008, str. 37 (Dwójniak), UL C 267, 9.11.2007, str. 40, kakor je bila popravljena v UL C 83, 2.4.2008, str. 10 (Półtorak), UL C 265, 7.11.2007, str. 29, kakor je bila popravljena v UL C 83, 2.4.2008, str. 10 (Trójniak).
Products of Annex I to the EC Treaty intended for human consumption:
Proizvodi iz Priloge I k Pogodbi ES, namenjeni za prehrano ljudi:
Class 1.8. Other products of Annex I to the Treaty
Skupina 1.8 Drugi proizvodi iz Priloge I k Pogodbi
Czwórniak (TSG)
Czwórniak (ZTP)
Dwójniak (TSG)
Dwójniak (ZTP)
Półtorak (TSG)
Półtorak (ZTP)
Trójniak (TSG)
Trójniak (ZTP)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 730/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 730/2008
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Carnalentejana (PDO))
o odobritvi večjih sprememb specifikacije za ime, registrirano v registru zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Carnalentejana (ZOP))
In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 9(1), and pursuant to Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the Commission has examined Portugal’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification of the protected designation of origin ‘Carnalentejana’ registered on the basis of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 [2].
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 9(1) in členom 17(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 je Komisija proučila vlogo Portugalske za odobritev sprememb specifikacije za zaščiteno označbo porekla „Carnalentejana“, registrirano v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1107/96 [2].
Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union [3] as required by the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of that Regulation.
Ker zadevne spremembe niso manjše v smislu člena 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006, je Komisija v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 6(2) navedene uredbe vlogo za spremembe objavila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3].
OJ C 255, 27.10.2007, p. 58.
UL C 255, 27.10.2007, str. 58.
Carnalentejana (PDO)
Carnalentejana (ZOP)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 731/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 731/2008
derogating from Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 as regards the additional security required for the import of high-quality common wheat
o odstopanju od Uredbe (ES) št. 1249/96 glede zahtevane dodatne varščine za uvoz navadne pšenice visoke kakovosti
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) [1], and in particular Article 143(b) thereof, in conjunction with Article 4 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 z dne 22. oktobra 2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode („Uredba o enotni SUT“) [1] in zlasti člena 143(b) v povezavi s členom 4 Uredbe,
Article 5(1), first subparagraph, point (b) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 of 28 June 1996 on rules of application (cereal sector import duties) for Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 [2], lays down the principle of a specific security for imports of high-quality common wheat, in addition to that required under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1342/2003 of 28 July 2003 laying down special detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences for cereals and rice [3].
Točka (b) prvega pododstavka člena 5(1) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1249/96 z dne 28. junija 1996 o pravilih za uporabo (uvoznih dajatev za sektor žit) Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 1766/92 [2] v primeru uvoza navadne pšenice visoke kakovosti predvideva načelo posebne dodatne varščine poleg varščin, ki so določene z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1342/2003 z dne 28. julija 2003 o posebnih podrobnejših pravilih za uporabo sistema uvoznih in izvoznih dovoljenj za žita in riž [3].
This additional security of EUR 95 per tonne is justified by the different customs duties on imports in force for different categories of common wheat depending on whether the wheat is of high quality or low and medium quality.
Navedena dodatna varščina v višini 95 EUR za tono je upravičena zaradi različnih uvoznih carin, ki se uporabljajo za različne kategorije navadne pšenice glede na to, ali gre za navadno pšenico visoke kakovosti ali za pšenico nizke in srednje kakovosti.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 608/2008 suspended customs duties on imports of certain cereals for the 2008/09 marketing year [4], which ends on 30 June 2009, while allowing them to be reintroduced before that date should the market situation so warrant.
Z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 608/2008 [4] so se začasno opustile uvozne carine za nekatera žita v tržnem letu 2008/2009, ki se konča 30. junija 2009, z možnostjo njihove ponovne uvedbe pred navedenim datumom, če to upravičijo razmere na trgu.
The temporary suspension of customs duties in respect of imports carried out on the basis of import licences issued from 1 July 2008, in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 608/2008, has meant the temporary removal of the specific circumstances justifying the establishment of a system of specific securities additional to those inherent in import licences.
Začasna opustitev carin, ki se uporablja za uvoze, opravljene na podlagi uvoznih dovoljenj, ki so bila izdana od 1. julija 2008 dalje v skladu s členom 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 608/2008, je začasno odpravila posebne okoliščine, ki poleg varščin iz uvoznega dovoljenja upravičujejo vzpostavitev dodatnega sistema posebnih varščin.
In view of those new conditions applicable to imports of common wheat since the entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 608/2008, the additional security of EUR 95 per tonne as provided for in the second subparagraph of Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 can no longer be justified until such time as customs duties on imports are reinstated.
Glede na navedene nove pogoje, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz navadne pšenice od začetka veljavnosti Uredbe (ES) št. 608/2008, dodatna varščina 95 EUR za tono iz drugega pododstavka člena 5(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1249/96 ni več upravičena, dokler se ponovno ne uvedejo uvozne carine.
Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 should therefore be derogated from and this Regulation should apply on the same date as that established for the suspension of custom duties (i.e. 1 July 2008), to avoid operators having to lodge the additional security.
Zato je treba uvesti odstopanje od Uredbe (ES) št. 1249/96 in določiti, da se ta uredba uporablja od datuma, ki je določen za začasno opustitev carin, tj. od 1. julija 2008, da prosilcem ne bi bilo treba položiti dodatne varščine.
By way of derogation from Article 5(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96, the additional security referred to in the said provision shall not be required during the period of suspension of customs duties on imports of common wheat as established by Regulation (EC) No 608/2008.
Z odstopanjem od člena 5(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 1249/96 se dodatna varščina iz navedene določbe ne zahteva v obdobju opustitve uvoznih carin za navadno pšenico, kot je določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 608/2008.
Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 732/2008
applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011 and amending Regulations (EC) No 552/97, (EC) No 1933/2006 and Commission Regulations (EC) No 1100/2006 and (EC) No 964/2007
o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov v obdobju od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2011 in spremembah uredb (ES) št. 552/97, (ES) št. 1933/2006 in uredb Komisije (ES) št. 1100/2006 in (ES) št. 964/2007
The Community’s common commercial policy is to be consistent with and to consolidate the objectives of development policy, in particular the eradication of poverty and the promotion of sustainable development and good governance in the developing countries.
Skupna trgovinska politika Skupnosti mora biti skladna s cilji razvojne politike in jih mora krepiti, zlasti cilje izkoreninjenja revščine in spodbujanja trajnostnega razvoja ter dobrega upravljanja v državah v razvoju.
It is to comply with WTO requirements, and in particular with the GATT ‘enabling clause’ of 1979 according to which WTO Members may accord differential and more favourable treatment to developing countries.
Biti mora v skladu z zahtevami STO, zlasti z Razvojno klavzulo (Enabling clause) GATT iz leta 1979, v skladu s katero lahko države članice STO dodelijo državam v razvoju različno in ugodnejšo obravnavo.
The Communication of 7 July 2004 from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee, entitled ‘Developing countries, international trade and sustainable development: the function of the Community’s generalised system of preferences (GSP) for the 10-year period from 2006 to 2015’, sets out the guidelines for the application of the scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period 2006 to 2015.
Sporočilo Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru z dne 7. julija 2004 z naslovom „Države v razvoju, mednarodna trgovina in trajnostni razvoj: Vloga Splošnega sistema preferencialov Skupnosti (GSP) v desetletju 2006–2015“ določa smernice za uporabo sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov za obdobje od 2006 do 2015.
Council Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 [2] applies the scheme of generalised tariff preferences until 31 December 2008.
Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 980/2005 [2] se shema splošnih tarifnih preferencialov uporablja do 31. decembra 2008.
Thereafter, the scheme should continue to apply until 31 December 2011, in accordance with the guidelines.
Po tem datumu bi bilo treba shemo v skladu s smernicami uporabljati do 31. decembra 2011.
The scheme of generalised tariff preferences (hereinafter referred to as the scheme) should consist of a general arrangement, granted to all beneficiary countries and territories, and two special arrangements taking account of the various development needs of countries in similar economic situations.
Shema splošnih tarifnih preferencialov (v nadaljnjem besedilu „shema“) bi morala vsebovati splošni režim, dodeljen vsem državam upravičenkam in ozemljem, za katere veljajo ugodnosti, ter dva posebna režima, ki upoštevata različne razvojne potrebe držav v podobnem gospodarskem položaju.
The general arrangement should be granted to all those beneficiary countries which are not classified by the World Bank as high-income countries and which are not sufficiently diversified in their exports.
Splošni režim bi bilo treba dodeliti vsem državam upravičenkam, ki jih Svetovna banka ne uvršča med države z visokim dohodkom in njihov izvoz ni dovolj raznovrsten.
The special incentive arrangement for sustainable development and good governance is based on the integral concept of sustainable development, as recognised by international conventions and instruments such as the 1986 UN Declaration on the Right to Development, the 1992 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, the 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, the 2000 UN Millennium Declaration, and the 2002 Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development.
Posebni spodbujevalni režim za trajnostni razvoj in dobro upravljanje temelji na celostni zasnovi trajnostnega razvoja, kot ga priznavajo mednarodne konvencije in instrumenti, kot so Deklaracija ZN o pravici do razvoja iz leta 1986, Deklaracija iz Ria o okolju in razvoju iz leta 1992, Deklaracija Mednarodne organizacije dela o temeljnih načelih in pravicah iz dela iz leta 1998, Milenijska deklaracija ZN iz leta 2000 in Deklaracija iz Johannesburga o trajnostnem razvoju iz leta 2002.
Consequently, additional tariff preferences should be granted to those developing countries which, due to a lack of diversification and insufficient integration into the international trading system, are vulnerable while assuming the special burdens and responsibilities resulting from the ratification and effective implementation of core international conventions on human and labour rights, environmental protection and good governance.
Zato bi bilo treba dodatne tarifne preferenciale dodeliti državam v razvoju, ki so zaradi pomanjkanja raznovrstnosti in nezadostne vključenosti v mednarodni trgovinski sistem ranljive, pri tem pa zaradi ratifikacije in učinkovitega izvajanja osnovnih mednarodnih konvencij o človekovih pravicah in pravicah delavcev, varstvu okolja in dobrem upravljanju, prevzemajo posebna bremena in odgovornosti.
These preferences should be designed to promote further economic growth and, thereby, to respond positively to the need for sustainable development.
Ti preferenciali naj bi spodbudili nadaljnjo gospodarsko rast in tako pozitivno vplivali na potrebo po trajnostnem razvoju.