natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The structure of the HR form SHOULD reflect the logical model described in section 5.1.2 of ETSI TS 102 231;
Struktura berljive oblike MORA odražati logični model, opisan v oddelku 5.1.2 ETSI TS 102 231.
Every present field SHOULD be displayed and provide:
Vsako polje MORA biti prikazano in navajati:
The title of the field (e.g. ‘Service type identifier’);
naziv polja (npr. „Service type identifier“),
The value of the field (e.g. ‘CA/QC’);
vrednost polja (npr. „CA/QC“),
The meaning (description) of the value of the field, when applicable and in particular as provided in Annex D of ETSI TS 102 231 or in the present specifications for registered URIs (e.g. ‘A Certification authority issuing public key certificates.’);
pomen (opis) vrednosti polja, kadar je to primerno in zlasti, kot je navedeno v Prilogi D k ETSI TS 102 231 ali v teh specifikacijah za registrirane URI (npr. „overitelj potrdil, ki izdaja potrdila javnega ključa“),
Multiple natural languages versions as provided in the TSL implementation of the Trusted List, when applicable.
več različic v naravnih jezikih, kot je opredeljeno v izvajanju TSL zanesljivega seznama, kadar je to primerno.
The following fields and corresponding values of the digital certificates present in the ‘Service digital identity’ field SHOULD be at a minimum displayed in the HR form:
Naslednja polja in ustrezne vrednosti digitalnih potrdil, navedene v polju „digitalna identiteta storitve“, MORAJO biti prikazani v berljivi obliki:
Version,
Različica
Serial number,
Serijska številka
Signature algorithm,
Algoritem za podpis
Issuer,
Izdajatelj
Valid from,
Velja od
Valid to,
Velja do
Subject,
Imetnik
Public key,
Javni ključ
Certificate Policies,
Politika, pod katero je bilo izdano potrdilo
Subject Key Identifier,
Identifikator imetnikovega ključa
CRL Distribution Points,
Distribucijske točke registra preklicanih potrdil
Authority Key Identifier,
Identifikator izdajateljevega ključa
Key Usage,
Uporaba ključa
Basic constraints,
Osnovne omejitve
Thumbprint algorithm,
Algoritem za razpoznavni odtis
Thumbprint,
Razpoznavni odtis
The HR form SHOULD be easily printable,
Berljiva oblika MORA biti enostavna za tiskanje.
As defined in Art. 2,11 of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Kot je opredeljeno v členu 2.11 Direktive 1999/93/ES.
As defined in Art. 2,10 of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Kot je opredeljeno v členu 2.10 Direktive 1999/93/ES.
As defined in Art. 2,6 of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Kot je opredeljeno v členu 2.6 Direktive 1999/93/ES.
As defined in Art. 2,2 of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Kot je opredeljeno v členu 2.2 Direktive 1999/93/ES.
For an AdES supported by a QC the acronym ‘AdESQC’ is used throughout the present document.
Za napredni elektronski podpis, ki temelji na kvalificiranem potrdilu, se v nadaljevanju uporablja kratica „AdESQC“.
Note that there are a number of electronic services based on simple AdES whose cross-border use would also be facilitated, provided that the supporting certification services (e.g. issuing of non-qualified certificates) are part of the supervised/accredited services covered by a Member State in the voluntary information part of their Trusted List.
Obstaja več elektronskih storitev, ki temeljijo na enostavnem AdES, katerih čezmejna uporaba bi prav tako bila pospešena, pod pogojem, da so podporne storitve overjanja (npr. izdajanje nekvalificiranih potrdil) del nadzorovanih/akreditiranih storitev, ki jih država članica vključi v prostovoljni del informacij v zanesljivem seznamu.
E.g. a certification service provider established in a Member State that provides a certification service that is initially supervised by the Member State (Supervisory Body), can, after a certain time, decide to pass a voluntary accreditation for the currently supervised certification service.
Npr. overitelj s sedežem v državi članici, ki nudi storitve overjanja in ga na začetku nadzoruje država članica (nadzorni organ), se lahko po določenem času odloči za prostovoljno akreditacijo za trenutno nadzorovane storitve overjanja.
Conversely, a certification service provider in another Member State can decide not to stop an accredited certification service but to move it from an accreditation status to a supervision status, e.g. for business and/or economic reasons.
Nasprotno se lahko overitelj v drugi državi članici odloči, da ne bo prenehal opravljati akreditiranih storitev overjanja, temveč da bo status akreditacije zamenjal s statusom nadzora, npr. zaradi poslovnih in/ali gospodarskih razlogov.
Refer to ETSI TS 101 862 — Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI): Qualified Certificate Profile.
Glej ETSI TS 101 862 – Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI): Qualified Certificate Profile.
i.e., and as a minimum, an X.509 v3 certificate of the issuing QCA or of an upper CA in the certification path.
Tj., najmanj, potrdilo X.509v3 izdajatelja QCA ali višjega CA v verigi overjanja.
IETF RFC 2119: ‘Key words for use in RFCs to indicate Requirements Levels’.
IETF RFC 2119: „Key words for use in RFCs to indicate Requirements Levels“.
i.e., the ‘Supervision/Accreditation Status List of certification services from Certification Service Providers, which are supervised/accredited by the referenced Member State for compliance with the relevant provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC’ (in short the ‘Trusted List’).
Tj. seznam statusa nadzora/akreditacije storitev overjanja overiteljev, ki jih referenčna država članica nadzira/akreditira zaradi skladnosti z zadevnimi določbami iz Direktive 1999/93/ES (na kratko „zanesljivi seznam“).
Meaning the fields specified by ETSI TS 102 231 — Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI): Provision of harmonized Trust-service status information and ‘profiled’ by the present specifications to specify the establishment of the Member States ' Trusted List.
Pomeni polja, podrobno opredeljena v ETSI TS 102 231 – Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI): Provision of harmonized Trust-service status information in „profilirana“ s temi specifikacijami za opredelitev priprave zanesljivega seznama držav članic.
The last two sets of information are of critical importance for relying parties to assess the quality and security level of such supervision/accreditation systems.
Zadnja dva sklopa informacij sta izjemno pomembna za to, da odvisne stranke ocenijo raven kakovosti in varnosti takšnih sistemov nadzora/akreditacije.
Those sets of information shall be provided at TL level through the use of the present ‘Scheme information URI’ (clause 5.3.7 — information being provided by Member State), ‘Scheme type/community/rules’ (clause 5.3.9 — through the use of a text common to all Member States) and ‘TSL policy/legal notice’ (clause 5.3.11 — a text common to all Member States referring to Directive 1999/93/EC, together with the ability for each Member State to add Member State specific text/references).
Ta dva sklopa informacij se zagotovita na ravni zanesljivega seznama s pomočjo trenutne „Scheme information URI“ (klavzula 5.3.7 – informacije, ki jih zagotovi država članica), „Scheme type/community/rules“ (klavzula 5.3.9 – s pomočjo besedila, ki je enako za vse države članice) in „TSL policy/legal notice“ (klavzula 5.3.11 – besedilo, ki je enako za vse države članice s sklicevanjem na Direktivo 1999/93/ES, skupaj z možnostjo, da vsaka država članica doda besedilo/reference, specifične za državo članico).
Additional information on national supervision/accreditation systems for CSPs not issuing QCs may be provided at service level when applicable and required (e.g. to distinguish between several quality/security levels) through the use of ‘Scheme service definition URI’ (clause 5.5.6).
Dodatne informacije o nacionalnih sistemih nadzora/akreditacije za overitelje, ki ne izdajajo kvalificiranih potrdil, se lahko zagotovijo na ravni storitve, če je to primerno in potrebno (npr. za razlikovanje med več ravnmi kakovosti/varnosti) s pomočjo „Scheme service definition URI“ (klavzula 5.5.6).
Using a RootCA X.509v3 certificate as ‘Sdi’ value for a listed service, will force the Scheme Operator to consider the whole set of certification services under such a Root CA as a whole with regards to the ‘supervision/accreditation status’.
Zaradi uporabe potrdila X.509v3 korenskega CA kot vrednosti „Sdi“ za navedeno storitev bo moral upravljavec sheme upoštevati celoten sklop storitev overjanja pod takšnim korenskim CA kot celoto v zvezi s „statusom nadzora/akreditacije“.
E.g. any status change required from one single CA under the listed root hierarchy, will force the whole hierarchy to take-on that status change.
Vsaka sprememba statusa, ki se zahteva od enega CA po navedeni korenski hierarhiji, bo npr. zahtevala prevzem te spremembe statusa v celotni hierarhiji.
This can be the certificate of a CA issuing end-entity certificates (e.g. CA/PKC, CA/QC) or the certificate of a trusted root CA from which a path can be found down to end-entity qualified certificates.
To je lahko potrdilo CA, ki izdaja potrdila končnim entitetam (npr. CA/PKC, CA/QC) ali potrdilo zaupanja vrednega overitelja korenskih potrdil, od katerega je mogoče najti pot do kvalificiranih potrdil končne entitete.
Depending on whether or not this information and the information to be found in every end-entity certificate issued under this trusted root can be used to unambiguously determine the appropriate characteristics of any qualified certificate, this information (Service digital identity) may need to be completed by ‘Service information extensions’ data (see clause 5.5.9).
To informacijo („Service digital identity“) bo morda treba dopolniti s „Service information extensions“) (klavzula 5.5.9), odvisno od tega, ali je te informacije in informacije, ki so navedene v vsakem potrdilu končne entitete, izdanem po tem zaupanja vrednem overitelju korenskih potrdil, mogoče uporabiti za nedvoumno določitev ustreznih lastnosti katerega koli kvalificiranega potrdila.
Note that this accredited CSP may be established in another Member State than the one identified in the ‘Scheme territory’ of the TSL implementation of the TL or in a third country (see Art.7.1(a) of Directive 1999/93/EC).
Ta akreditiran CSP ima lahko sedež v drugi državi članici, ki ni opredeljena v „Scheme territory“ pri izvajanju TSL zanesljivega seznama, ali v tretji državi (glej člen 7.1(a) Direktive 1999/93/ES).
See section 2.2 of the present document.
Glej oddelek 2.2 tega dokumenta.
This refers to an appropriate combination of ETSI defined QcCompliance statement, QcSSCD statements [ETSI TS 101 862] or a QCP/QCP + ETSI defined OID [ETSI TS 101 456].
To se nanaša na ustrezno kombinacijo v ETSI opredeljene izjave QcCompliance, izjave QcSSCD (ETSI TS 101 862) ali QCP/QCP+ v ETSI opredeljene OID (ETSI TS 101 456).
While the implementation of their TL in full compliance with the ETSI TS 102 231, and thus electronically signed, can be considered as the ideal target for all Member States, in order to guarantee a truly interoperable, online and machine-processable framework to facilitate the validation and cross-border use of QES and AdESQC, Member States will be allowed, for practical reasons, to implement intermediate forms of their TL according to the present technical specifications provided that they ensure the dissemination of those TL intermediate forms through secure channels.
Medtem ko je izvajanje njihovih zanesljivih seznamov, ki so v celoti skladni z ETSI TS 102 231 in zato elektronsko podpisani, mogoče obravnavati kot idealni cilj za vse države članice, pa bo državam članicam omogočeno, da za zagotovitev resnično interoperabilnega, spletnega in strojno obdelovalnega okvira za pospeševanje potrjevanja in čezmejne uporabe QES in AdESQC ter iz praktičnih razlogov izvedejo vmesne oblike zanesljivih seznamov, v skladu s temi tehničnimi specifikacijami, pod pogojem, da zagotovijo razširjanje teh vmesnih oblik zanesljivih seznamov po varnih kanalih.
It is mandatory to protect the Scheme Operator signing certificate with the signature in one of the ways specified by ETSI TS 101 733 or ETSI TS 101 903 respectively.
Obvezno je zaščititi upravljavca sheme, ki podpisuje potrdilo, s podpisom, izdelanim na enega izmed načinov, opredeljenih v ETSI TS 101 733 oziroma ETSI TS 101 903.
Despite the fact that separate bodies of a Member State may be in charge of the supervision and accreditation of certification services in that Member State, it is expected that only one entry shall be used for one single certification service (identified by its ‘Service digital identity’ as per ETSI TS 102 231 [9] and that its supervision/accreditation status will be updated accordingly.
Čeprav so lahko za nadzor in akreditacijo storitev overjanja pristojni različni organi države članice, se pričakuje, da bo za posamezno storitev overjanja uporabljen samo en vnos (opredeljen s „Service digital identity“ po ETSI TS 102 231 [9] in da bo njen status nadzora/akreditacije posodobljen v skladu s tem.
The meaning of the above depicted statuses is described in the related clause 5.5.4 of the detailed technical specifications in Chapter I.
Pomen zgoraj opisanih statusov je opisan v zadevni klavzuli 5.5.4 podrobnih tehničnih specifikacij v poglavju I.
TL entries aiming at facilitating the validation of QES and AdESQC
Vnosi v zanesljivi seznam, ki so namenjeni olajšanju potrjevanja QES in AdESQC
The most critical part of the creation of the TL is the establishment of the mandatory part of the TL, namely the ‘List of services’ per CSP issuing QCs, in order to correctly reflect the exact issuing situation of each such QC-issuing certification service and to ensure that the information provided in each entry is sufficient to facilitate the validation of QES and AdESQC (when combined with the content of the end-entity QC issued by the CSP under the certification service listed in this entry).
Najpomembnejši del priprave zanesljivega seznama je vzpostavitev obveznega dela zanesljivega seznama, in sicer „seznama storitev“ za overitelja, ki izdaja kvalificirana potrdila, da se pravilno odraža natančno stanje izdajanja vsakega overitelja, ki izdaja kvalificirana potrdila, in da se zagotovi, da so informacije, posredovane pri vsakem vnosu, zadostne za olajšanje potrjevanja kvalificiranih elektronskih podpisov in AdESQC (ko so združene z vsebino kvalificiranega potrdila končne entitete, ki ga izda overitelj po storitvi overjanja, navedeni v tem vnosu).
Ideally each issued QC should include the ETSI defined QcCompliance [10] statement when it is claimed that it is a QC and should include the ETSI defined QcSSCD statement when it is claimed that it is supported by an SSCD to generate eSignatures, and/or that each issued QC includes one of the QCP/QCP + certificate policy Object Identifiers (OIDs) defined in ETSI TS 101 456 [11].
Najbolje bi bilo, da bi vsako izdano kvalificirano potrdilo vsebovalo s strani ETSI opredeljeno izjavo QcCompliance [10], kadar naj bi šlo za QC, in da bi vključevalo s strani ETSI opredeljeno izjavo QcSSCD, kadar naj bi bilo podprto s SSCD za ustvarjanje e-podpisov, in/ali da bi vsako izdano kvalificirano potrdilo vključevalo eno od identifikacijskih oznak (OID) politike potrdila QCP/QCP+, opredeljeno v ETSI TS 101 456 [11].
The use by CSPs issuing QCs of different standards as references, the wide degree of interpretation of those standards as well as the lack of awareness of the existence and precedence of some normative technical specifications or standards has resulted in differences in the actual content of currently issued QCs (e.g. the use or not of those QcStatements defined by ETSI) and consequently are preventing the receiving parties from simply relying on the signatory’s certificate (and associated chain/path) to assess, at least in a machine readable way, whether or not the certificate supporting an eSignature is claimed to be a QC and whether or not it is associated with an SSCD through which the eSignature has been created.
Ker so overitelji, ki izdajajo kvalificirana potrdila, za reference uporabljali različne standarde, ker so bili ti standardi zelo različno tolmačeni in zaradi pomanjkanja ozaveščenosti o obstoju in prednostne razvrstitve nekaterih normativnih tehničnih specifikacij ali standardov, je prišlo do razlik v dejanski vsebini trenutno izdanih QC (npr. uporaba oziroma neuporaba s strani ETSI opredeljenih izjav QC), kar pa posledično strankam prejemnicam preprečuje, da bi se zanesle na potrdilo podpisnika (in povezano verigo/pot) za oceno, vsaj v strojno berljivi obliki, ali je potrdilo, ki podpira e-podpis, kvalificirano potrdilo in ali je povezano s SSCD, s katero je bil e-podpis ustvarjen.
to indicate the SSCD support:
navedba podpore SSCD:
‘QCWithSSCD’ qualifier value meaning ‘QC supported by an SSCD’, or
vrednost kvalifikatorja „QCWithSSCD“ pomeni „QC, podprt s SSCD“, ali
The number of entries in the list per recognised CSP might be reduced where one or several Upper CA services exist, e.g. in the context of a commercial hierarchy of CAs from a Root CA down to issuing CAs.
Število vnosov na seznamu za priznanega CSP je mogoče zmanjšati, kjer obstaja ena ali več storitev višjih CA, npr. v okviru komercialne hierarhije CA od korenskih CA pa vse do CA izdajateljev.
However even in those cases, the principle of ensuring the unambiguous link between a CSPQC certification service and the set of certificates meant to be identified as QCs has to be maintained and ensured.
Vendar pa je treba celo v teh primerih ohraniti in zagotoviti jasno povezavo med storitvijo overjanja CSPQC in nizom potrdil, namenjenih opredelitvi kot QC.
The HR form MAY be signed electronically.
Berljivo obliko je MOGOČE podpisati elektronsko.
When signed it MUST be signed by the Scheme Operator according to the same signature specifications as for the TSL implementation of the Trusted List.
Ko je podpisana, jo MORA podpisati upravljavec sheme v skladu z enakimi specifikacijami za podpis, kot veljajo za izvajanje TSL zanesljivega seznama.
establishing standard reporting formats for presenting the monitoring results of the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, as or in products, for the purpose of placing on the market, pursuant to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o določitvi standardnih obrazcev za poročanje o rezultatih spremljanja namernega sproščanja gensko spremenjenih organizmov v okolje, kot proizvodov ali v proizvodih, namenjenih dajanju v promet, v skladu z Direktivo 2001/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(notified under document C(2009) 7680)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 7680)
Having regard to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC [1], and in particular the second sentence of the first paragraph of Annex VII thereto,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2001/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. marca 2001 o namernem sproščanju gensko spremenjenih organizmov v okolje in razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 90/220/EGS [1] ter zlasti drugega stavka prvega odstavka Priloge VII k navedeni direktivi,
In accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC, before a Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) is placed on the market, a notification shall be submitted to the competent authority of the Member State where the GMO is to be placed on the market for the first time.
Preden se gensko spremenjeni organizem (GSO) da v promet, je treba v skladu z Direktivo 2001/18/ES pristojnemu organu države članice, v kateri naj bi se GSO prvič dal v promet, predložiti prijavo.
That notification shall contain a plan for monitoring in accordance with Annex VII to that Directive.
Prijava vsebuje načrt spremljanja v skladu s Prilogo VII k navedeni direktivi.
In accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC, the notifier may proceed with the placing on the market only when he has received the written consent of the competent authority, and in conformity with any conditions required in that consent.
Prijavitelj lahko v skladu z Direktivo 2001/18/ES začne dajanje v promet šele po prejemu pisne odobritve pristojnega organa in pod pogoji iz odobritve.
The written consent for the placing on the market of a GMO shall explicitly specify monitoring requirements in accordance with Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC, including obligations to report to the Commission and competent authorities.
Pisna odobritev za dajanje GSO v promet mora izrecno vsebovati zahteve glede spremljanja v skladu s Prilogo VII k Direktivi 2001/18/ES, vključno z obveznostmi glede poročanja Komisiji in pristojnim organom.
In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed [2], in the case of GMOs or food and feed containing or consisting of GMOs, the application for authorisation shall also be accompanied by a monitoring plan for environmental effects conforming with Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC.
V skladu z Uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1829/2003 z dne 22. septembra 2003 o gensko spremenjenih živilih in krmi [2] pri GSO ali živilu in krmi, ki vsebujeta GSO ali sta iz njega sestavljena, vlogo za odobritev spremlja tudi načrt spremljanja učinkov na okolje, skladen s Prilogo VII k Direktivi 2001/18/ES.
Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC describes in general terms the objectives to be achieved and the general principles to be followed when designing the monitoring plan.
V Prilogi VII k Direktivi 2001/18/ES so na splošno opisani cilji, ki jih je treba doseči, in splošna načela, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri pripravi načrta spremljanja.
In accordance with that Annex technical guidance notes may be developed in accordance with the regulatory procedure laid down in Article 30(2) of Directive 2001/18/EC in order to provide explanations concerning Annex VII and thus facilitate the implementation of that Annex.
V skladu z navedeno prilogo se lahko na podlagi regulativnega postopka iz člena 30(2) Direktive 2001/18/ES pripravijo tehnična navodila, ki bodo v pomoč pri razlagi in izvajanju Priloge VII.
Council Decision 2002/811/EC [3] sets out guidance notes supplementing the information provided in Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC.
Odločba Sveta 2002/811/ES [3] določa navodila, ki dopolnjujejo informacije iz Priloge VII k Direktivi 2001/18/ES.
In order to ensure that the objectives of Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC are fulfilled in the most consistent, transparent and thorough manner, it is appropriate to further supplement that Annex by adopting formats for the presentation of monitoring results for the placing on the market of GMOs, with a particular focus on genetically modified higher plants.
Za zagotovitev, da so cilji iz Priloge VII k Direktivi 2001/18/ES izpolnjeni kar najbolj usklajeno, pregledno in natančno, je primerno, da se navedena priloga dopolni s sprejetjem obrazcev za predstavitev rezultatov spremljanja dajanja gensko spremenjenih organizmov v promet, zlasti gensko spremenjenih višjih rastlin.
Given the different requirements for monitoring the cultivation of GMOs and monitoring the import and processing and food and feed uses of GMOs, separate formats should be established.
Ker se zahteve za spremljanje gojenja gensko spremenjenih organizmov, za spremljanje uvoza in predelave ter za uporabo gensko spremenjenih organizmov za prehrano ljudi in živali razlikujejo, bi bilo treba določiti ločene obrazce.
In view of the need to consider adverse effects in the light of the crop, the new trait, the receiving environment as well as the conclusions of the environmental risk assessment, the reports should take into consideration the non-exhaustive list of effects, consequences and outcomes that could result in adverse environmental effects as listed in the explanatory notes.
Ker je treba škodljive učinke presojati glede na pridelek, novo značilnost, prejemno okolje ter glede na ugotovitve ocene tveganja za okolje, bi bilo treba v poročilih upoštevati nepopoln seznam učinkov, posledic in rezultatov, ki bi lahko imeli škodljive učinke na okolje, navedene v pojasnjevalnih opombah.