natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It should be possible to grant the approvals conditionally in order to allow operators to rectify deficiencies before the establishment or plant obtains full approval.
Treba bi bilo omogočiti pogojno izdajanje odobritev, da bi se nosilcem dejavnosti omogočilo, da odpravijo pomanjkljivosti preden obrat ali objekt dobi popolno odobritev.
Establishments or plants whose operations have already been approved in accordance with Community legislation on food hygiene should not be required to be approved or registered under this Regulation, as approvals or registrations under that Community legislation already take into account the objectives of this Regulation.
Za obrate ali objekte, katerih delovanje je že bilo odobreno v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti o higieni živil, ni bi smela biti potrebna odobritev ali registracija v skladu s to uredbo, ker so že v odobritvah ali registracijah po zakonodaji Skupnosti upoštevani cilji te uredbe.
However, establishments or plants which have been approved or registered under hygiene legislation should be obliged to comply with the requirements of this Regulation and subject to official controls carried out for the purposes of verifying compliance with the requirements of this Regulation.
Vendar pa bi morali obrati in objekti, ki so bili odobreni ali registrirani v skladu z zakonodajo o higieni živil, izpolnjevati zahteve te uredbe in biti pod uradnim nadzorom z namenom preverjanja, ali izpolnjujejo zahteve te uredbe.
Animal by-products and derived products should be classified into three categories which reflect the degree of risk that they pose to public and animal health, on the basis of risk assessments.
Živalski stranski proizvodi in pridobljeni proizvodi bi morali biti razvrščeni v tri kategorije, ki na podlagi ocen tveganja odražajo stopnjo tveganja za javno zdravje in zdravje živali.
While animal by-products and derived products posing a high risk should only be used for purposes outside the feed chain, their use posing a lower risk should be permitted under safe conditions.
Medtem ko se živalski stranski proizvodi in pridobljeni proizvodi, ki pomenijo veliko tveganje, lahko uporabijo samo za namene zunaj krmne verige, bi bilo treba za te proizvode, ki pomenijo manjše tveganje, dovoliti uporabo v skladu z varnimi pogoji.
Progress in science and technology may lead to the development of processes which eliminate or minimise the risks to public and animal health.
Napredek znanosti in tehnologije lahko privede do razvoja postopkov, ki izločijo ali čim bolj zmanjšajo tveganja za javno zdravje in zdravje živali.
Amendments to the lists of animal by-products set out in this Regulation should be possible, in order to take account of such progress.
Možne bi morale biti spremembe seznamov živalskih stranskih proizvodov, določenih v tej uredbi, da se takšen napredek lahko upošteva.
Prior to any such amendments, and in accordance with the general principles of Community legislation aimed at ensuring a high level of protection of public and animal health, a risk assessment should be carried out by the appropriate scientific institution, such as EFSA, the European Medicines Agency or the Scientific Committee for Consumer Products, depending on the type of animal by-products for which risks are to be assessed.
Pred vsakimi takšnimi spremembami in v skladu s splošnimi načeli zakonodaje Skupnosti, katere cilj je zagotoviti visoko raven zaščite javnega zdravja in zdravstvenega varstva živali, bi morala ustrezna znanstvena ustanova, kot so Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (EFSA), Evropska agencija za zdravila ali Znanstveni odbor za potrošniške proizvode, izvesti oceno tveganja, odvisno od živalskih stranskih proizvodov, za katero je treba tveganje oceniti.
However, it should be clear that once animal by-products of different categories are mixed, the mixture should be handled in accordance with the standards laid down for the proportion of the mixture belonging to the highest risk category.
Vendar bi moralo biti jasno, da je treba z mešanico živalskih stranskih proizvodov različnih kategorij ravnati v skladu s standardi, določenimi za delež v mešanici, ki sodi v kategorijo največjega tveganja.
Due to the high risk to public health, animal by-products giving rise to a risk of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) should, in particular, not be used for feed.
Zaradi velikega tveganja za javno zdravje se živalski stranski proizvodi, ki pomenijo tveganje za transmisivne spongiformne enecefalopatije (TSE), zlasti ne bi smeli uporabiti za krmo.
This restriction should also apply to wild animals through which a communicable disease may be transmitted.
Ta omejitev bi se morala uporabljati tudi za prosto živeče živali, preko katerih se lahko nalezljiva bolezen prenaša.
The restriction on the feeding of animal by-products giving rise to a TSE risk should be without prejudice to the feeding rules laid down in Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.
Omejitev glede uporabe živalskih stranskih proizvodov, ki pomenijo tveganje TSE, v krmi ne bi smela posegati v pravila za krmljenje iz Uredbe (ES) št. 999/2001.
Animal by-products from animals used for experiments as defined in Directive 86/609/EEC should also be excluded from use in feed, due to the potential risks arising from those animal by-products.
Živalski stranski proizvodi iz živali, uporabljenih v preizkusih, opredeljenih v Direktivi 86/609/EGS, bi prav tako morali biti izključeni iz uporabe v krmi zaradi možnih tveganj, ki jih povzročajo ti živalski stranski proizvodi.
However, Member States may allow the use of animal by-products from animals which have been used for experiments to test new feed additives, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition [11].
Vendar države članice lahko dovolijo uporabo živalskih stranskih proizvodov iz živali, ki so bile uporabljene v preizkusih za testiranje novih krmnih dodatkov v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1831/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. septembra 2003 o dodatkih za uporabo v prehrani živali [11].
The use of certain substances and products is unlawful under Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 of 26 June 1990 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in food stuffs of animal origin [12] and Council Directive 96/22/EC of 29 April 1996 concerning the prohibition on the use in stockfarming of certain substances having a hormonal or thyrostatic action and of ß agonists [13].
Uporaba določenih snovi in proizvodov je v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 2377/90 z dne 26. junija 1990 o določitvi postopka Skupnosti za določanje najvišjih mejnih vrednosti ostankov zdravil za uporabo v veterinarski medicini v živilih živalskega izvora [12] in Direktivo Sveta 96/22/ES z dne 29. aprila 1996 o prepovedi uporabe v živinoreji določenih snovi, ki imajo hormonalno ali tirostatično delovanje, in beta-agonistov [13] nezakonita.
In addition, Council Directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products [14] lays down further rules on the monitoring of certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products.
Poleg tega Direktiva Sveta 96/23/ES z dne 29. aprila 1996 o ukrepih za spremljanje nekaterih snovi in njihovih ostankov v živih živalih in v živalskih proizvodih [14] določa nadaljnja pravila o spremljanju nekaterih snovi in njihovih ostankov v živih živalih in v živalskih proizvodih.
Directive 96/23/EC also lays down rules which apply where the presence of residues of authorised substances or contaminants exceeding certain permitted levels has been established.
Direktiva 96/23/ES tudi določa pravila, ki se uporabljajo, kadar je ugotovljena prisotnost ostankov dovoljenih snovi in kontaminantov, ki presega določene dovoljene ravni.
In order to ensure the coherence of Community legislation, products of animal origin in which substances are detected in breach of Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 and Directives 96/22/EC and 96/23/EC should be classified as Category 1 or Category 2 material, as appropriate, in view of the risk they pose to the food and feed chain.
Za zagotovitev skladnosti zakonodaje Skupnosti, bi morali biti proizvodi živalskega izvora, v katerih so ugotovljene snovi, ki so v nasprotju z Uredbo (EGS) št. 2377/90 ter direktivama 96/22/ES in 96/23/ES, razvrščeni, kadar je to ustrezno, kot snovi kategorije 1 ali kategorije 2, glede na tveganje, ki ga povzročajo za prehransko in krmno verigo.
Manure and digestive tract content should not need to be disposed of, provided that proper treatment ensures that diseases are not transmitted during their application to land.
Gnoja in vsebine prebavnega trakta ne bi bilo treba odstranjevati, pod pogojem da se z ustrezno obdelavo zagotovi, da se med njihovo uporabo na zemljišču ne prenašajo bolezni.
Animal by-products from animals that die on farm and animals killed for the eradication of diseases should not be used in the feed chain.
Živalski stranski proizvodi iz živali, ki poginejo na kmetiji, in živali, ki so ubite zaradi izkoreninjenja bolezni, se ne bi smele uporabljati v krmni verigi.
This restriction should also apply to imported animal by-products which are allowed into the Community, where they do not comply with Community legislation upon inspection at the Community border post, and to products which do not comply with the applicable requirements during checks carried out within the Community.
Ta omejitev bi se morala uporabljati tudi za uvožene živalske stranske proizvode, ki so dovoljeni v Skupnosti, če na podlagi inšpekcijskega pregleda na mejnem prehodu Skupnosti niso v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti, ter za proizvode, ki med pregledi, izvedenimi znotraj Skupnosti, niso v skladu z veljavnimi zahtevami.
Non-compliance with Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs [15] and with Regulation (EC) No 767/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the placing on the market and use of feed [16] should not result in the exclusion from the feed chain of products presented for border inspection.
Neupoštevanje Direktive 2000/13/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. marca 2000 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o označevanju, predstavljanju in oglaševanju živil [15] ter Uredbe (ES) št 767/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. julija 2009 o dajanju krme na trg in njeni uporabi [16] ne bi smelo povzročati izključevanje proizvodov, predstavljenih za mejno kontrolo, iz krmne verige.
Since the date of entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002, the classification of certain animal by-products by default as Category 2 material limits their possible uses severely, while not necessarily being proportionate to the risks involved.
Od začetka veljavnosti Uredbe (ES) št. 1774/2002 avtomatična razvrstitev nekaterih živalskih stranskih proizvodov v kategorijo 2 resno omejuje njihove možne uporabe, čeprav niso nujno sorazmerne s tveganjem.
Accordingly those animal by-products should be reclassified as Category 3 material, so as to allow their use for certain feeding purposes.
Navedene živalske stranske proizvode bi zato bilo treba ustrezno prerazvrstiti v snovi kategorije 3, tako da se omogoči njihova uporaba za nekatere namene krmljenja.
For any other animal by-products which are not listed under one of the three categories, the categorisation by default as Category 2 material should be maintained for precautionary reasons, in particular to reinforce the general exclusion of such material from the feed chain for farmed animals, other than fur animals.
Za vse druge živalske stranske proizvode, ki niso na seznamu v eni od treh kategorij, bi bilo treba avtomatično razvrstitev med snovi kategorije 2 ohraniti iz previdnostnih razlogov, predvsem zato, da se poveča splošna izključitev takšnih snovi iz krmne verige rejnih živali, ki niso kožuharji.
Other legislation which has entered into force following the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety [17], namely Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs [18], Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 183/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 January 2005 laying down requirements for feed hygiene [19], and to which Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 is complementary, places the primary duty of complying with Community legislation, aimed at protecting public and animal health, on the food and feed business operators.
Druga zakonodaja, ki je začela veljati po sprejetju Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2002 o določitvi splošnih načel in zahtevah živilske zakonodaje, ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost hrane in postopkih, ki zadevajo varnost hrane [17], in sicer Uredba (ES) št. 852/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o higieni živil [18], Uredba (ES) št. 853/2004 in Uredba (ES) št. 183/2005 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. januarja 2005 o zahtevah glede higiene krme [19], ki jih dopolnjuje Uredba (ES) št. 1774/2002, določa, da imajo nosilci živilske dejavnosti in dejavnosti proizvodnje krme glavno odgovornost za usklajevanje z zakonodajo Skupnosti, katere cilj je zaščita javnega zdravja in zdravja živali.
In line with that legislation, operators carrying out activities under this Regulation should also be primarily responsible for ensuring compliance with this Regulation.
V skladu z navedeno zakonodajo bi morali nosilci dejavnosti, ki opravljajo dejavnosti v skladu s to uredbo, imeti tudi glavno odgovornost za zagotavljanje usklajenosti s to uredbo.
That obligation should be further clarified and specified as regards the means by which traceability is ensured, such as separate collection and channelling of animal by-products.
Navedeno obveznost bi bilo treba še nadalje pojasniti in podrobno določiti glede sredstev, s katerimi se zagotavlja sledljivost, kot je ločeno zbiranje in usmerjanje živalskih stranskih proizvodov.
Established systems ensuring traceability for products exclusively circulating at national level by other means should continue to operate, if they provide equivalent information.
Vzpostavljeni sistemi, ki na druge načine zagotavljajo sledljivost za proizvode, ki krožijo izključno na nacionalni ravni, bi morali še naprej delovati, če zagotavljajo enakovredne informacije.
Every effort should be made to promote the use of electronic and other means of documentation which do not involve paper records, as long as they ensure full traceability.
Treba bi si bilo močno prizadevati za spodbujanje elektronskih in drugih načinov dokumentacije, ki ne vključujejo pisne oblike, če zagotavljajo sledljivost.
A system of own checks is necessary to ensure that, within an establishment or plant, the requirements of this Regulation are fulfilled.
Potreben je sistem lastnih pregledov za zagotovitev, da so zahteve te uredbe izpolnjene znotraj obrata ali objekta.
During official controls the competent authorities should take into account the performance of own checks.
Med uradnimi nadzori bi morali pristojni organi upoštevati izvajanje lastnih pregledov.
In certain establishments or plants own checks should be carried out through a system based on the hazard analysis and critical control points (HACCP) principles.
Lastne preglede bi bilo treba v določenih obratih ali objektih izvajati prek sistema, ki temelji na načelih analize tveganj in kritičnih nadzornih točk (HACCP).
The HACCP principles should be based on the experience of their implementation under Community legislation on food and feed hygiene.
Načela HACCP bi morala temeljiti na izkušnjah izvajanja v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti o higieni živil in krme.
In this respect, national guides to good practice could serve as a useful tool to facilitate the practical implementation of the HACCP principles, and of other aspects of this Regulation.
V zvezi s tem bi lahko bile nacionalne smernice za dobro prakso koristno orodje za pospeševanje izvajanja načel HACCP in drugih vidikov te uredbe.
Animal by-products should only be used if the risks to public and animal health are minimised in the course of their processing and the placing on the market of derived products manufactured on the basis of animal by-products.
Živalski stranski proizvodi bi se morali uporabljati samo, če so tveganja za javno zdravje in zdravje živali zmanjšana na minimum med njihovo predelavo in dajanjem na trg pridobljenih proizvodov, izdelanih iz živalskih stranskih proizvodov.
If this option is not available, the animal by-products should be disposed of under safe conditions.
Če ta možnost ni izvedljiva, bi bilo treba živalske stranske proizvode odstraniti pod varnimi pogoji.
The options available for the use of animal by-products of the different categories should be clarified in coherence with other Community legislation.
Možnosti, ki so na voljo za uporabo živalskih stranskih proizvodov različnih kategorij, bi bilo treba pojasniti v skladu z drugo zakonodajo Skupnosti.
In general, the options for a higher risk category should be available for the lower risk categories as well, unless special considerations apply in view of the risk attached to certain animal by-products.
Na splošno bi morale biti možnosti za kategorije največjega tveganja razpoložljive tudi za kategorije manjšega tveganja, razen če se uporabljajo posebne okoliščine glede tveganja, povezanega z določenimi živalskimi stranskimi proizvodi.
Disposal of animal by-products and derived products should take place in accordance with environmental legislation regarding landfilling and waste incineration.
Odstranjevanje živalskih stranskih proizvodov in pridobljenih proizvodov bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z okoljsko zakonodajo v zvezi z odlaganjem in sežiganjem odpadkov.
In order to ensure consistency, incineration should take place in accordance with Directive 2000/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2000 on the incineration of waste [20].
Za zagotovitev doslednosti bi bilo treba sežiganje izvajati v skladu z Direktivo 2000/76/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. decembra 2000 o sežiganju odpadkov [20].
Co-incineration of waste – either as a recovery or disposal operation – is subject to similar conditions regarding approval and operation to those regarding waste incineration, in particular as to air emission limit values, waste water and residue discharge, control and monitoring and measurement requirements.
Pri sosežiganju odpadkov – kot predelavi ali kot odstranjevanju – se upoštevajo podobni pogoji glede odobritve in delovanja kot za sežiganje odpadkov, zlasti mejne vrednosti emisij v zrak, izpust odpadnih voda in ostankov, zahteve v zvezi z nadzorom, spremljanjem ter merjenjem.
Consequently, direct co-incineration, without prior processing, of all three categories of materials should be permitted.
Zato bi bilo treba neposredno sosežiganje brez prehodne predelave dovoliti za snovi vseh treh kategorij.
In addition, specific provisions should be enacted for the approval of low and high-capacity incineration plants.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba določiti posebne določbe, da bi se odobrile sežigalnice z nizko in visoko zmogljivostjo.
The use of animal by-products or derived products as a fuel in the combustion process should be authorised and should not be considered as a waste disposal operation.
Uporabo živalskih stranskih proizvodov ali pridobljenih proizvodov, kot so goriva v postopku zgorevanja, bi bilo treba dovoliti in se je ne bi smelo obravnavati kot odstranjevanje odpadkov.
However, such use should take place under conditions which ensure the protection of public and animal health, as well as the appropriate environmental standards.
Vendar bi bilo treba takšno uporabo izvajati pod pogoji, ki zagotavljajo zaščito javnega zdravja in zdravja živali, kakor tudi ustrezne okoljske standarde.
This Regulation should provide for the possibility to lay down parameters for processing methods regarding time, temperature and pressure for animal by-products, in particular for the methods currently referred to as methods 2 to 7 under Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002.
Ta uredba bi morala zagotoviti možnost določitve parametrov za metode predelave živalskih stranskih proizvodov glede časa, temperature in pritiska, zlasti za metode, znane kot metode od 2 do 7 iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1774/2002.
Shells from shellfish from which the soft tissue or flesh have been removed, should be excluded from the scope of the Regulation.
Lupine lupinarjev, iz katerih je bilo odstranjeno mehko tkivo ali meso, bi bilo treba izključiti iz področja uporabe te uredbe.
Due to the various practices in the Community regarding the removal of such soft tissue or flesh from shells, it should be possible to use shells from which the entire soft tissue or flesh has not been removed, provided such use does not lead to a risk arising to public and animal health.
Zaradi različnih praks v Skupnosti glede odstranitve takšnega mehkega tkiva ali mesa iz lupin, bi bilo treba omogočiti uporabo lupin, iz katerih ni bilo v celoti odstranjeno mehko tkivo ali meso, če takšna uporaba ne povzroča tveganja v zvezi z javnim zdravjem in zdravjem živali.
National guides to good practice could assist in the dissemination of knowledge regarding proper conditions under which such use would be possible.
Nacionalna navodila za dobro prakso lahko prispevajo k razširjanju znanja glede ustreznih pogojev, pod katerimi bi bila takšna uporaba možna.
In view of the limited risk to public or animal health arising from such products, the competent authority should be able to authorise the preparation and application to land of biodynamic preparations, on the basis of Category 2 and Category 3 materials, as referred to in Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products [21].
Glede na omejeno tveganje za javno zdravje in zdravje živali zaradi takšnih proizvodov bi moral pristojni organ imeti možnost, da dovoli pripravo biodinamičnih pripravkov iz snovi kategorije 2 in kategorije 3 iz Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 834/2007 z dne 28. junija 2007 o ekološki pridelavi in označevanju ekoloških proizvodov [21].
Novel technologies which are being developed offer advantageous ways of generating energy on the basis of animal by-products or of providing for the safe disposal of such products.
Nove tehnologije, ki se razvijajo, omogočajo ugodne načine za proizvajanje energije na podlagi živalskih stranskih proizvodov ali za zagotavljanje varnega odstranjevanja takšnih proizvodov.
Safe disposal may take place through a combination of methods for the safe containment of animal by-products on site with established disposal methods, and through a combination of authorised processing parameters with new standards which have been favourably assessed.
Varno odstranjevanje lahko poteka s kombinacijo metod za varno izoliranje živalskih stranskih proizvodov na kraju samem z uveljavljenimi metodami odstranjevanja in z združevanjem odobrenih pridelovalnih parametrov z novimi standardi, ki so bili pozitivno ocenjeni.
In order to take account of the related progress in science and technology, such technologies should be authorised as alternative methods for the disposal or use of animal by-products throughout the Community.
Da bi se upošteval znanstveni in tehnološki napredek na tem področju, bi bilo treba takšne tehnologije dovoliti kot alternativne metode za odstranjevanje ali uporabo živalskih stranskih proizvodov po vsej Skupnosti.