natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Despite these warnings, the 2006 restructuring plan eventually submitted by Poland in September 2006, with a 2-month delay, did not differ substantially from the first draft.
Kljub tem opozorilom se načrt za prestrukturiranje 2006, ki ga je Poljska z dvomesečno zamudo predložila septembra 2006, ni bistveno razlikoval od prvega osnutka.
The Commission’s main criticisms of the 2006 restructuring plan are described below.
Glavne kritike Komisije v zvezi z načrtom za prestrukturiranje 2006 so opisane spodaj.
At a meeting on 7 December 2006 and by letter of 29 January 2007, the Commission indicated to the Polish authorities that a preliminary examination had concluded that the 2006 restructuring plan did not comply with any of the conditions for the approval of restructuring aid under the current guidelines.
Na sestanku 7. decembra 2006 in v dopisu z dne 29. januarja 2007 je Komisija poljskim organom sporočila, da je bilo v okviru predhodne proučitve ugotovljeno, da načrt za prestrukturiranje 2006 ne izpolnjuje pogojev za odobritev pomoči za prestrukturiranje po veljavnih smernicah.
The Polish authorities announced at that meeting that they intended to re-launch the privatisation of Gdynia Shipyard by way of an open and transparent procedure with a view to attracting a private investor who would take full control over the yard.
Poljski organi so na sestanku napovedali, da nameravajo ponovno začeti privatizacijo ladjedelnice Gdynia z odprtim in preglednim postopkom, z namenom pridobiti zasebnega investitorja, ki bi v celoti prevzel nadzor nad ladjedelnico.
In May 2007 the Polish Government announced that the negotiations had failed and that the privatisation process would be relaunched.
Maja 2007 je poljska vlada naznanila, da pogajanja niso bila uspešna in da se bo postopek privatizacije ponovno začel.
The Commission also warned Poland that, at that point, the conditions that the yard’s long-term viability had to be restored and restructuring had to be financed at least in part from resources free of State aid did not appear to have been met.
Komisija je Poljsko tudi opozorila, da pogoja, da je treba obnoviti dolgoročno sposobnost preživetja ladjedelnice in da se mora prestrukturiranje vsaj delno financirati iz virov, ki ne zajemajo državne pomoči, takrat nista bila izpolnjena.
At the same time, following an agreement reached between Commissioner Kroes and Minister Woźniak in December 2006, the Commission was engaged in intensive discussions with the Polish authorities and Gdynia Shipyard with a view to determining the necessary countervailing measures.
Hkrati, po dogovoru med komisarko Kroesovo in ministrom Woźniakom decembra 2006, je Komisija vodila intenzivne razgovore s poljskimi organi in ladjedelnico Gdynia z namenom določitve nujnih izravnalnih ukrepov.
By letter of 28 February 2007 Poland undertook to close the SD I dock in Gdynia Shipyard after outstanding orders had been processed and the necessary investments in the SD II dry dock had been completed, i.e. as of January 2010.
Z dopisom z dne 28. februarja 2007 se je Poljska zavezala, da bo zaprla dok SD I v ladjedelnici Gdynia, ko bodo odprta naročila obdelana in bodo naložbe v suhi dok SD II zaključene, tj. januarja 2010.
In order to check whether this proposal constituted a genuine countervailing measure, the Commission asked Gdynia Shipyard to provide it with information on a number of matters.
Da bi preverila, ali ta predlog predstavlja pravi izravnalni ukrep, je Komisija ladjedelnico Gdynia zaprosila za vse informacije o več zadevah.
Eventually the Commission informed Poland by letter of 31 July 2007 that it was prepared, on a preliminary basis, to consider the closure of dry dock SD I as a sufficient countervailing measure on condition that the closure entailed scrapping the facility in such a way as to irreversibly disable ship assembly and launching activities and that closure was implemented as of 1 September 2009, or earlier if vessel 8185/04, the last one on the yard’s order book as at 8 March 2007, were launched prior to that date.
Komisija je Poljsko z dopisom z dne 31. julija 2007 obvestila, da je pripravljena predhodno obravnavati zaprtje suhega doka SD I kot zadosten izravnalni ukrep, pod pogojem, da se zmogljivost nepreklicno onemogoči za namene izgradnje in splavitve ladij ter da se zaprtje izvede 1. septembra 2009 ali prej, če se plovilo 8185/04, zadnje v knjigi naročil ladjedelnice na dan 8. marca 2007, splavi pred tem datumom.
In addition, in 2009, dock SD I could only be used to assemble the two vessels currently scheduled for assembly on that dock in 2009 and which could not be transferred to dock SD II (LPG carriers 8185/03 and 8185/04).
Poleg tega je mogoče dok SD I v letu 2009 uporabljati za sestavljanje dveh plovil, ki sta trenutno načrtovani za sestavljanje na tem doku v letu 2009 in ki ju ni mogoče prestaviti na dok SD II (plovili za prevoz UNP 8185/03 in 8185/04).
The basis for the Commission’s conclusion is described below.
Podlaga za sklepno ugotovitev Komisije je opisana spodaj.
As described in the procedure above, the Commission transmitted comments on the information memorandum of which Poland took due account.
Kot je opisano v postopku zgoraj, je Komisija posredovala pripombe v zvezi z informacijskim memorandumom in Poljska jih je upoštevala.
Noting further delays in the privatisation process, the Commission urged Poland by letter of 3 October 2007 to complete privatisation without delay.
Zaradi nadaljnjih zamud pri postopku privatizacije je Komisija Poljsko z dopisom z dne 3. oktobra 2007 pozvala, naj privatizacijo zaključi brez zavlačevanja.
The Commission reiterated its concerns with regard to the delays by letter dated 30 November 2008 and indicated that it expected the new owner of Gdynia Shipyard to submit the first draft of a new restructuring plan by end-February 2008.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 30. novembra 2008 ponovila zaskrbljenost v zvezi z zamudami in navedla, da od novega lastnika ladjedelnice Gdynia pričakuje, da bo do konca februarja 2008 predložil prvi osnutek novega načrta za prestrukturiranje.
This request was subsequently repeated by the Commission on numerous occasions.
To zahtevo je Komisija nato še večkrat ponovila.
The Commission frequently insisted on strict adherence to the privatisation schedule, stating that there did not appear to be any justification for Poland to restart the privatisation process.
Komisija je pogosto vztrajala pri strogem upoštevanju časovnega okvira privatizacije in navedla, da Poljska nima razloga za ponoven začetek postopka privatizacije.
Poland informed the Commission that 11 companies had asked for Gdynia Shipyard’s information memorandum and that four companies had submitted initial offers by the deadline of 1 October 2007.
Poljska je Komisijo obvestila, da je za informacijski memorandum ladjedelnice Gdynia zaprosilo enajst podjetij in da so do roka 1. oktobra 2007 štiri podjetja predložila prve ponudbe.
The four companies were accepted for a due diligence examination.
Ta podjetja so sprejeli za pregled s potrebno skrbnostjo.
Eventually, three binding offers were submitted by the deadline of 20 December 2007.
Do roka 20. decembra 2007 so bile predložene tri zavezujoče ponudbe.
At end-January 2008, Poland decided to enter into negotiations with two of these investors.
Konec januarja 2008 se je Poljska odločila za pogajanja z dvema investitorjema.
In mid-February 2008, Poland announced that the privatisation process of Gdynia Shipyard would be completed by summer 2008, i.e. 1 year later than initially promised by Poland in January 2007.
Sredi februarja 2008 je Poljska naznanila, da bo postopek privatizacije ladjedelnice Gdynia končan do poletja 2008, tj. leto pozneje, kot je Poljska obljubila januarja 2007.
As of 20 March 2008, one of these investors, Amber Sp. z o.o.
marca 2008 so enemu od investitorjev, Amber Sp. z.o.o.
(hereinafter Amber), a subsidiary of Złomrex, a Polish steel trading company, was granted exclusive negotiating rights, which were subsequently extended several times, finally ending on 12 May 2008.
(v nadaljnjem besedilu: Amber), hčerinski družbi Złomrexa, poljskega trgovca z jeklom, dodelili izključne pogajalske pravice, ki so bile nato večkrat podaljšane in dokončno zaključene 12. maja 2008.
Poland forwarded a draft restructuring plan for Gdynia Shipyard prepared by Amber to the Commission on 29 February 2008 [17].
Poljska je Komisiji 29. februarja 2008 posredovala osnutek načrta za prestrukturiranje ladjedelnice Gdynia, ki ga je pripravil Amber [17].
Amber submitted updated financial projections by email dated 9 April 2008.
Amber je predložil posodobljene finančne projekcije z elektronsko pošto dne 9. aprila 2008.
The Commission provided verbal comments on this draft at a meeting with representatives of the Polish authorities, Amber and Gdynia Shipyard held in Warsaw on 10 April 2008, and written comments by letter of 21 April 2008.
Komisija je podala ustne pripombe v zvezi s tem osnutkom na sestanku s predstavniki poljskih organov, podjetja Amber in ladjedelnice Gdynia, ki je 10. aprila 2008 potekal v Varšavi. Pisne pripombe je podala z dopisom z dne 21. aprila 2008.
At a meeting with the Polish authorities on 12 May 2008, Amber announced that it had withdrawn from the privatisation process of Gdynia Shipyard.
Na sestanku s poljskimi organi 12. maja 2008 je Amber naznanil, da se umika iz postopka privatizacije ladjedelnice Gdynia.
Poland informed the Commission of this development on the same day.
Poljska je Komisijo še isti dan obvestila o teh dogodkih.
In the justification for its decision sent to the Treasury, Amber cited as the main reason for its withdrawal the fact that, after an in-depth due diligence examination of the shipyard’s situation, it had concluded that the yard would not become profitable even after restructuring measures, including significant investments, had been implemented.
V utemeljitvi svoje odločitve, ki jo je Amber poslal ministrstvu za finance, je podjetje kot glavni razlog za umik navedlo dejstvo, da je po poglobljenem skrbnem pregledu stanja ladjedelnice ugotovilo, da ladjedelnica ne bo postala dobičkonosno podjetje, četudi se izvedejo ukrepi za prestrukturiranje, vključno z velikimi naložbami.
On 15 May 2008 the Polish authorities decided to close the privatisation process in the form of a public invitation to negotiations with bidders whose offers had been admitted to the procedure started in 2007.
maja 2008 so se poljski organi odločili, da zaključijo postopek privatizacije z javnim pozivom k pogajanjem s ponudniki, katerih ponudbe so sprejeli v postopku, ki se je začel leta 2007.
On 26 May 2008, Poland informed the Commission that the privatisation process had been relaunched.
maja 2008 je Poljska Komisijo obvestila, da je ponovno začela postopek privatizacije.
In subsequent daily reports, the Polish authorities informed the Commission of the actions they had taken to find a buyer for Gdynia Shipyard.
V poznejših dnevnih poročilih so poljski organi Komisijo obveščali o ukrepih, ki so jih sprejeli za iskanje kupca za ladjedelnico Gdynia.
Poland forwarded several letters to the Commission in which potential investors expressed an interest in being kept informed of the ongoing privatisation process and in receiving the information memorandum when available.
Poljska je Komisiji posredovala več dopisov, v katerih so potencialni investitorji izrazili interes, da bi bili obveščeni o tekočem postopku privatizacije in da bi prejeli informacijski memorandum, ko bo ta na voljo.
At the meeting of 10 June 2008 it emerged that the Polish authorities were conducting intensive talks with ISD Polska, the current owner of Gdańsk Shipyard, on the possible purchase of Gdynia Shipyard and a merger of the two yards.
Na sestanku 10. junija 2008 je prišlo na dan, da poljski organi vodijo intenzivne razgovore z ISD Polska, sedanjim lastnikom ladjedelnice Gdańsk, in sicer v zvezi z morebitnim nakupom ladjedelnice Gdynia in združitvijo obeh ladjedelnic.
Poland proposed new countervailing measures and indicated that the new investor had requested additional State aid as a condition for taking part in the privatisation.
Poljska je predlagala nove izravnalne ukrepe in navedla, da je novi investitor zahteval dodatno državno pomoč kot pogoj za udeležbo pri privatizaciji.
Poland also informed the Commission that ISD Polska was preparing a joint restructuring plan for both yards to be submitted to the Commission by 26 June 2008, in line with the information injunction adopted by the Commission with regard to State aid case C 18/05 [18].
Poljska je Komisijo tudi obvestila, da ISD Polska pripravlja skupni načrt za prestrukturiranje obeh ladjedelnic, ki ga bodo Komisiji predložili do 26. junija 2008, v skladu z odredbo o predložitvi podatkov, ki jo je Komisija sprejela v zvezi s primerom državne pomoči C 18/05 [18].
At the request of the Polish authorities, the Commission informed Poland and ISD Polska at the meeting of 10 June 2008 and again at the meeting of 13 June 2008 that certain framework conditions would have to be met if ISD Polska was to purchase Gdynia Shipyard with the intention of operating it jointly with the one in Gdańsk.
Na zahtevo poljskih organov je Komisija na sestanku 10. junija 2008 in ponovno na sestanku 13. junija 2008 Poljsko in ISD Polska obvestila, da bodo morali biti izpolnjeni nekateri okvirni pogoji, če želi ISD Polska kupiti ladjedelnico Gdynia z namenom, da jo upravlja skupaj z ladjedelnico Gdańsk.
These framework conditions were that ISD Polska would have to present a joint restructuring plan for both yards by 26 June 2008, contribute significantly to the restructuring costs and adopt meaningful countervailing measures in accordance with the relevant guidelines.
Ti okvirni pogoji so zahtevali, da ISD Polska do 26. junija 2008 predloži skupni načrt za prestrukturiranje obeh ladjedelnic, da znatno prispeva k stroškom prestrukturiranja in da sprejme smiselne izravnalne ukrepe v skladu z veljavnimi smernicami.
The Commission stated that ISD Polska’s proposed contribution to restructuring costs was insufficient, bearing in mind the amount of State aid that the yard had received in the past and the additional aid that ISD Polska had applied for in connection with privatisation.
Komisija je navedla, da predlagani prispevek ISD Polska k stroškom prestrukturiranja ni zadosten glede na znesek državne pomoči, ki ga je ladjedelnica prejela v preteklosti, in glede na dodatno pomoč, za katero je ISD Polska zaprosil v zvezi s privatizacijo.
By letter of 6 June 2008, Poland informed the Commission that the Government had adopted a decision on 3 June 2008 to contribute capital of PLN 515 million to Gdynia Shipyard, partly to cover anticipated losses on existing shipbuilding contracts.
Z dopisom z dne 6. junija 2008 je Poljska Komisijo obvestila, da je vlada 3. junija 2008 sprejela odločitev, da bo za ladjedelnico Gdynia prispevala znesek v višini 515 milijonov PLN, delno za kritje izgube, ki naj bi jo po pričakovanjih prinesle obstoječe pogodbe.
On 26 June 2008 the Commission received a draft restructuring plan dated June 2008 and prepared by ISD Polska entitled ‘Restructuring Plan of the New Gdańsk-Gdynia Shipyard’, presenting a joint restructuring strategy for the shipyards in Gdańsk and Gdynia (hereinafter the ‘joint restructuring plan (of ISD)’).
junija 2008 je Komisija prejela osnutek načrta za prestrukturiranje iz junija 2008, ki ga je pripravil ISD Polska. Načrt je bil naslovljen „Načrt za prestrukturiranje nove ladjedelnice Gdańsk-Gdynia“, predstavljal pa je skupno strategijo za prestrukturiranje ladjedelnic Gdańsk in Gdynia (v nadaljnjem besedilu: skupni načrt za prestrukturiranje (ISD)).
The Commission also received a draft restructuring plan dated June 2008 and prepared by the Polish Shipbuilding Company entitled ‘Restructuring Plan of Gdynia Shipyard for 2008-2012’ (hereinafter ‘the Restructuring Plan of PSC’).
Komisija je prejela tudi osnutek načrta za prestrukturiranje iz junija 2008, ki ga je pripravila Poljska ladjedelnica. Načrt je bil naslovljen „Načrt za prestrukturiranje ladjedelnice Gdynia za obdobje 2008–2012“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: načrt za prestrukturiranje PSC).
A brief description of the two plans is set out below.
Spodaj je kratek opis obeh načrtov.
By letter of 14 July 2008 Poland informed the Commission that the privatisation of Gdynia Shipyard was continuing and requested additional time for potential investors to finalise the restructuring plan.
Z dopisom z dne 14. julija 2008 je Poljska Komisijo obvestila, da se privatizacija ladjedelnice Gdynia nadaljuje, in zaprosila za več časa, kar bo potencialnemu investitorju omogočilo dokončanje načrta za prestrukturiranje.
Poland undertook to submit a definitive restructuring plan for Gdynia Shipyard by 12 September 2008 at the latest.
Poljska se je zavezala, da bo najpozneje 12. septembra 2008 predložila končni načrt za prestrukturiranje ladjedelnice Gdynia.
The Commission agreed to wait until a decision had been taken to submit a definitive restructuring plan.
Komisija je pristala na to, da počaka na predložitev končnega načrta za prestrukturiranje.
On 12 September 2008, Poland submitted the final restructuring plan prepared by ISD Polska entitled ‘Restructuring Plan of the New Gdańsk-Gdynia Shipyard’ (hereinafter ‘the joint restructuring plan of 12 September’), which is essentially an updated version of the joint restructuring plan of 26 June 2008
septembra 2008 je Poljska predložila končni načrt za prestrukturiranje, ki ga je pripravil ISD Polska, z naslovom „Načrt za prestrukturiranje nove ladjedelnice Gdańsk-Gdynia“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: skupni načrt za prestrukturiranje z dne 12. septembra), kar je pravzaprav posodobljena različica skupnega načrta za prestrukturiranje z dne 26. junija 2008.
2006 RESTRUCTURING PLAN
NAČRT ZA PRESTRUKTURIRANJE 2006
According to the 2006 restructuring plan, the amendments to the 2004 restructuring plan were necessary because of a change in the macroeconomic climate, i.e. the appreciation in the zloty against the US dollar from PLN 4,1 to PLN 3,0 per USD and the rise in the steel price from USD 300/t to USD 700/t, which had adversely affected the shipyard’s economic situation, coupled with insufficient State aid, as a result of which the 2004 restructuring plan could not be implemented in full.
Glede na načrt za prestrukturiranje 2006 so bile spremembe načrta za prestrukturiranje 2004 nujne zaradi spremembe v makroekonomskem okolju, tj. zaradi dviga tečaja zlota v primerjavi z ameriškim dolarjem, in sicer s 4,1 PLN na 3,0 PLN za dolar, in zaradi dviga cen jekla s 300 USD za tono na 700 USD za tono, kar pa je negativno vplivalo na gospodarsko stanje ladjedelnice. K slabemu stanju je prispevala tudi nezadostna državna pomoč, zaradi česar načrta za prestrukturiranje 2004 ni bilo mogoče v celoti uresničiti.
The objectives of the 2006 restructuring plan are to effectively limit operating costs, improve efficiency in the shipyard and ensure that shipbuilding is profitable.
Cilji načrta za prestrukturiranje 2006 so učinkovito omejiti stroške poslovanja, izboljšati storilnost ladjedelnice in zagotoviti, da ladjedelništvo prinaša dobiček.
Sales strategy
Prodajna strategija
The planned sales strategy was to concentrate on standard vessels, which comprised container vessels and car carriers.
Po načrtovani prodajni strategiji naj bi se osredotočili na standardna plovila, to pomeni kontejnerske ladje in ladje za prevoz avtomobilov.
The shipyard also planned to maintain capacity for niche markets if profitable offers arose.
Ladjedelnica je načrtovala tudi ohranjanje zmogljivosti za tržne niše, če se pojavijo dobičkonosne ponudbe.
The main measures are:
Glavni ukrepi so:
IT investments worth EUR 6,6 million are also planned;
Načrtovane so tudi naložbe v IT v višini 6,6 milijona EUR,
Employment restructuring, i.e. elimination of increasingly commonplace fixed-term employment contracts and measures designed to achieve target employment levels.
prestrukturiranje zaposlovanja, tj. odprava vedno pogostejših pogodb o zaposlitvi za določen čas in ukrepi, namenjeni za doseganje ciljnega števila zaposlenih.
Introduction of an incentive scheme.
Uvedba spodbujevalne sheme.
The plan underlined the importance of protecting the yard against the currency risk.
načrt je poudaril pomembnost zaščite ladjedelnice pred tečajnim tveganjem.
To that end; 70 % of the yard’s revenue is to be hedged against the currency risk from 2007 to 2012 by way of foreign exchange transactions;
V ta namen bodo med letoma 2007 in 2012 70 % prihodkov ladjedelnice zavarovali pred tečajnim tveganjem s pomočjo menjalniških poslov,
There will be further spin-offs of subsidiaries (such as Zakładowa Służba Ratownicza, Wydział Technicznej Obsługi Urządzeń Dźwignicowych etc.) and asset sales;
izvedli bodo nadaljnje izločitve hčerinskih družb (na primer Zakładowa Służba Ratownicza, Wydział Technicznej Obsługi Urządzeń Dźwignicowych itd.) z ustanovitvijo neodvisnega podjetja in odprodali sredstva,
Improvements to the design process (standardisation of design solutions).
izboljšave postopka načrtovanja (standardizacija oblikovalskih rešitev).
This also includes an option to spin-off the Design Office which was to be decided in 2007;
To vključuje tudi izločitev oddelka za oblikovanje, o čemer se bo odločalo leta 2007,
Other measures such as contract renegotiation, application of indexation clauses in contracts to hedge against currency risks, employee incentive scheme, process optimisation and financial asset sales.
drugi ukrepi, kot na primer ponovno izpogajanje pogodb, uporaba klavzul o indeksiranju v pogodbah za zaščito pred tečajnimi tveganji, spodbujevalne sheme za zaposlene, optimizacija postopka in prodaja finančnega premoženja.
Financial restructuring measures
Ukrepi finančnega prestrukturiranja
The shipyard should carry out financial restructuring.
Ladjedelnica bi morala izvesti finančno prestrukturiranje.
At end-2005 equity amounted to – PLN 285,4 million.
Konec leta 2005 je lastniški kapital znašal 285,4 milijona PLN.
It was planned to improve the yard’s equity situation in 2006-2007 by way of a capital injection of PLN 1015 million in total: a capital increase of PLN 500 million in 2006 was to be financed by private investors and a capital increase of PLN 515 million in 2007 by a private or public investor.
Načrtovano je bilo, da se bo stanje lastniškega kapitala ladjedelnice v letih 2006–2007 izboljšalo, in sicer s povečanjem kapitala v skupni višini 1015 milijona PLN: leta 2006 naj bi dokapitalizacijo v višini 500 milijonov PLN financirali zasebni investitorji, dokapitalizacijo v letu 2007 v višini 515 milijonov PLN pa zasebni ali javni investitor.
Target figures at the end of restructuring — restoration of long-term viability
Ciljne vrednosti ob koncu prestrukturiranja – obnova dolgoročne sposobnosti preživetja
Production is expected to increase further to 324110 CGT in 2012 (12 vessels).
Pričakuje se, da se bo proizvodnja v letu 2012 povečala na 324110 KBT (12 plovil).
Average employment is to be reduced from 5208 in May 2006 to a target level of 4530 at end-2007.
Povprečno število zaposlenih naj bi se s 5208 maja 2006 zmanjšalo na ciljno raven 4530 konec leta 2007.
The plan includes a sensitivity analysis on the following issues:
Načrt vključuje analizo občutljivosti v zvezi z naslednjimi vprašanji:
Appreciation in the PLN against the USD by PLN 0,05 and 0,1 annually as opposed to a constant exchange rate of PLN/USD 3,00 as in the baseline scenario;
dvig vrednosti PLN v primerjavi z USD za 0,05 in 0,1 PLN na leto v nasprotju s stalnim tečajem PLN/USD 3,00, kot je navedeno v osnovnem scenariju,
Maintaining ship production at the level of 10 ships in 2009-2010, whereas in the baseline scenario 11 ships are to be produced in 2009-2010 and 12 in 2011-2012;
ohranjanje proizvodnje na ravni 10 ladij v letih 2009–2010, pri čemer osnovni scenarij predvideva 11 ladij v letih 2009–2010 in 12 ladij v letih 2011–2012,
Faster growth in various settlement rates (remuneration for work and rates for variable and invariable cooperation) in 2008-2012 than in the baseline scenario;
hitrejša rast različnih poravnav (plačilo za delo ter za občasno in stalno sodelovanje) v letih 2008–2012 v primerjavi z osnovnim scenarijem,