natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
in point 16, under the heading ‘GERMANY-HUNGARY’, the text is replaced by the following:
besedilo pod točko 16, pod naslovom „NEMČIJA-MADŽARSKA“ se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 40(1)(b) of the Convention on Social Security of 2 May 1998;
Člen 40(1)(b) Konvencije o socialni varnosti z dne 2. maja 1998;
point 16 of the Closing Protocol to the said Convention.’;
točka 16 Zaključnega protokola omenjene konvencije.“;
in point 28, under the heading ‘HUNGARY-AUSTRIA’, the text is replaced by the following:
besedilo pod točko 28, pod naslovom „MADŽARSKA-AVSTRIJA“ se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Article 36(3) of the Convention on Social Security of 31 March 1999.’;
„Člen 36(3) Konvencije o socialni varnosti z dne 31. marca 1999.“;
‘Part 2, Chapter 17, of the Social Welfare Consolidation Act 2005.’;
„Del 2 poglavja 17 Social Welfare Consolidation Act 2005 (Prečiščeni zakon o socialni varnosti iz leta 2005).“;
under the heading ‘R.
besedilo pod naslovom „R.
NETHERLANDS’, the following point is added:
NIZOZEMSKA“ se doda naslednja točka:
de Wet werk en inkomen naar arbeidsvermogen (the Work and Income according to Labour Capacity Act) (WIA) of 10 November 2005.’;
de Wet werk en inkomen naar arbeidsvermogen – WIA (Zakon o delu in plači glede na sposobnost za delo) z dne 10. novembra 2005.“;
‘None.’;
„Jih ni.“;
under the heading ‘S.
pod naslovom „S.
AUSTRIA’, the text is replaced by the following:
AVSTRIJA“ se nadomesti z naslednjim:
All applications for benefit under the Allgemeines Sozialversicherungsgesetz (Act on General Social Security) (ASVG), the Gewerbliches Sozialversicherungsgesetz (Act on Social Security for Persons Engaged in Industry) (GSVG) and the Bauern-Sozialversicherungsgesetz (Act on Social Security for Farmers) (BSVG), in so far as Articles 46b and 46c of the Regulation do not apply.
Vsi zahtevki za dajatve po Allgemeines Sozialversicherungsgesetz – ASVG (Splošni zakon o socialni varnosti), po Gewerbliches Sozialversicherungsgesetz – GSVG (Zakon o socialni varnosti za osebe v industriji) ter po Bauern-Sozialversicherungsgesetz – BSVG (Zakon o socialni varnosti za kmete), v kolikor se ne uporabljata člena 46b in 46c Uredbe.
All applications for the following benefits on the basis of a pension account under the Allgemeines Pensionsgesetz (Act on the General Pensions) (APG), in so far as Articles 46b and 46c of the Regulation do not apply:
Vsi zahtevki za naslednje dajatve na podlagi pokojninskega računa v skladu s Allgemeines Pensionsgesetz – APG (Splošni pokojninski zakon) z dne 18. novembra 2004, v kolikor se ne uporabljata člena 46b in 46c Uredbe:
old-age pensions;
starostne pokojnine;
invalidity pensions;
invalidske pokojnine;
survivors' pensions, save that no increase of benefit is to be calculated on the basis of additional insurance months under Article 7(2) of the APG.’;
pokojnine preživelih oseb, z izjemo, da se ne izračuna povišanje na podlagi dodatnih mesecev zavarovanja v skladu s členom 7(2) APG.“;
under the heading ‘D.
besedilo pod naslovom „D.
DENMARK’, the text is amended as follows:
DANSKA“ se spremeni
in point 6, the words ‘of 20 December 1989’ are deleted;
v točki 6 se črta besedilo „z dne 20. decembra 1989“;
point 11 is replaced by the following:
točka 11 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The intermediate benefit paid to unemployed persons who have benefited from the “flexjob” scheme (ledighedsydelse) (pursuant to the Active Social Policy Act) comes under Title III, Chapter 6 (unemployment benefits).
Začasna dajatev za brezposelne osebe, ki so vključene v program ‚prožne zaposlitve‘ (ledighedsydelse) (v skladu z Zakonom o aktivni socialni politiki), je zajeta s poglavjem 6 naslova III (dajatve za brezposelnost).
As far as unemployed persons going to another Member State are concerned, the provisions of Articles 69 and 71 of the Regulation apply when the Member State concerned has similar schemes for the same category of persons.’;
Za brezposelne osebe, ki odidejo v drugo državo članico, se uporabljajo določbe členov 69 in 71 Uredbe, če ima zadevna država članica podobne programe zaposlovanja za isto kategorijo oseb.“;
NETHERLANDS’, the text is amended as follows:
NIZOZEMSKA“ se spremeni:
point 1(a)(ii) is replaced by the following:
točka 1(a)(ii) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
in so far as they are not already included under point (i), members of the family of active military personnel who are living in another Member State and persons who are resident in another Member State and who under the Regulation are entitled to health care in their state of residence, the costs being borne by the Netherlands.’;
kolikor niso vključeni že v točko (i), družinski člani aktivnega vojaškega osebja, ki živijo v drugi državi članici, in osebe, ki imajo stalno prebivališče v drugi državi članici in so v skladu z Uredbo upravičene do zdravstvenega varstva v državi njihovega stalnega prebivališča, pri čemer stroške krije Nizozemska.“;
point 1(c) is replaced by the following:
točka 1(c) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The provisions of the Zorgverzekeringswet (Health Care Insurance Act) and the Algemene Wet Bijzondere Ziektekosten (General Act on Exceptional Medical Expenses) concerning liability for the payment of contributions shall apply to the persons referred to in point (a) and the members of their families.
Določbe Zorgverzekeringswet (Zakon o zdravstvenem zavarovanju) in Algemene Wet Bijzondere Ziektekosten (Splošni zakon o izrednih zdravstvenih stroških) se v zvezi z obveznostjo plačila prispevkov uporabljajo za osebe iz točke (a) in njihove družinske člane.
In respect of family members, the contributions shall be levied on the person from whom the right to health care is derived with the exception of the members of the family of military personnel living in another Member State, on whom they shall be levied directly.’;
V primeru družinskih članov se prispevki obračunajo osebi, od katere izvira pravica do zdravstvenega varstva, razen za družinske člane vojaškega osebja, ki živijo v drugi državi članici, ki se jim prispevki obračunajo neposredno.“;
Application of the Dutch laws relating to incapacity for work
Uporaba nizozemske zakonodaje o nezmožnosti za delo
Any employed or self-employed person who is no longer insured under the Algemene arbeidsongeschiktheidswet (General Disability Act) (AAW) of 11 December 1975, the Wet arbeidsongeschiktheidsverzekering zelfstandigen (Self-employed Persons Disablement Benefits Act) (WAZ) of 24 April 1997, the Wet op de arbeidsongeschiktheidsverzekering (Disability Insurance Act) (WAO) of 18 February 1966 or the Wet werk en inkomen naar arbeidsvermogen (Work and Income according to Labour Capacity Act) (WIA) of 10 November 2005 is considered to be so when the risk materialises, for the purposes of the application of the provisions of Chapter 3 of Title III of the Regulation, if that person is insured under the legislation of another Member State for the same risk or, failing that, if a benefit is due for the same risk in pursuance of the legislation of another Member State.
Vsaka zaposlena ali samozaposlena oseba, ki ni več zavarovana v skladu z Algemene arbeidsongeschiktheidswet – AAW (Splošni zakon o nezmožnosti za delo) z dne 11. decembra 1975, Wet arbeidsongeschiktheidsverzekering zelfstandigen – WAZ (Zakon o dajatvah za samozaposlene osebe, ki so nezmožne za delo) z dne 24. aprila 1997, Wet op de arbeidsongeschiktheidsverzekering – WAO (Zakon o zavarovanju za primer nezmožnosti za delo) z dne 18. februarja 1966 ali z Wet werk en inkomen naar arbeidsvermogen – WIA (Zakon o delu in plači glede na sposobnost za delo) z dne 10. novembra 2005, se za namene določb poglavja 3 naslova III Uredbe v trenutku nesreče še vedno šteje za zavarovano, če je zavarovana za primer enake nesreče v skladu z zakonodajo druge države članice ali, če temu ni tako, če je v primeru enake nesreče upravičena do dajatve v skladu z zakonodajo druge države članice.
The latter condition shall be considered to be fulfilled, however, in the case referred to in Article 48(1).
Slednji pogoj se šteje za izpolnjen v primerih iz člena 48(1).
If, pursuant to point (a), the person concerned is entitled to a Dutch invalidity benefit, such benefit shall be paid in accordance with the rules laid down in Article 46(2) of the Regulation:
Če ima oseba v skladu s točko (a) pravico do nizozemske invalidnine, se ta dajatev izplača po pravilih iz člena 46(2) Uredbe:
in accordance with the provisions laid down in the WAO if, prior to the occurrence of the incapacity for work, the person concerned was last engaged in work as an employed person within the meaning of Article 1(a) of the Regulation, if the incapacity for work occurred before 1 January 2004; if the incapacity for work occurred on or after 1 January 2004, the amount of the benefit is calculated on the basis of the WIA;
v skladu z določbami WAO, če je oseba, preden je postala nezmožna za delo, delala kot zaposlena oseba v smislu člena 1(a) Uredbe, če je postala nezmožna za delo pred 1. januarjem 2004; če je postala nezmožna za delo 1. januarja 2004 ali po tem datumu, se višina dajatve izračuna na podlagi WIA;
in accordance with the provisions laid down in the WAZ if, prior to the occurrence of the incapacity for work, the person concerned was last engaged in work in a capacity other than that of an employed person within the meaning of Article 1(a) of the Regulation.
v skladu z določbami WAZ, če je oseba pred nastopom nezmožnosti za delo delala v drugem svojstvu kot zaposlena oseba v smislu člena 1(a) Uredbe.
For the calculation of the benefits paid in accordance with the WAO, the WIA or the WAZ, the Dutch institutions shall take account of:
Pri izračunu plačila dajatev v skladu z WAO ali WIA ali WAZ nizozemske ustanove upoštevajo:
periods of paid employment and periods treated as such completed in the Netherlands before 1 July 1967,
dobe plačane zaposlitve in dobe, ki se obravnavajo kot dobe plačane zaposlitve, dopolnjene na Nizozemskem pred 1. julijem 1967,
periods of insurance completed under the WAO,
zavarovalne dobe, dopolnjene po WAO,
periods of insurance completed by the person concerned after the age of 15 years under the AAW in so far as these do not coincide with the periods of insurance completed under the WAO,
zavarovalne dobe, ki jih osebe dopolnijo po dopolnjenem 15. letu starosti po AAW, pod pogojem, da ne sovpadajo z zavarovalnimi dobami, dopolnjenimi po WAO,
periods of insurance completed in accordance with the WAZ,
zavarovalne dobe, dopolnjene po WAZ,
periods of insurance completed in accordance with the WIA.
zavarovalne dobe, dopolnjene po WIA.
In the calculation of the Dutch invalidity benefit pursuant to Article 40(1) of the Regulation, the Dutch institutions do not take into account any supplements granted under the provisions of the Law on Supplements.
Pri izračunu nizozemske invalidnine v skladu s členom 40(1) Uredbe nizozemski organi ne upoštevajo morebitnih dodatkov, dodeljenih v skladu z Zakonom o dodatkih.
The right to the supplement and the amount thereof are calculated only on the basis of the Law on Supplements.’;
Pravica do dodatka in njegova višina se izračunavata izključno na podlagi Zakona o dodatkih.“;
AUSTRIA’, the following point is added:
AVSTRIJA“ se doda naslednja točka:
To calculate the theoretical amount in respect of benefits based on a pension account under the Allgemeines Pensionsgesetz (Act on the General Pensions) (APG) for the purposes of Article 46(2)(a) of the Regulation, the competent institution takes into account, for each insurance month completed under other Member States' legislation, that portion of the total credit determined in accordance with the APG on the reference date which corresponds to the quotient of the total credit and the number of insurance months on which the total credit is based.’;
Za izračun teoretičnega zneska dajatev za namene člena 46(2)(a) Uredbe, ki temeljijo na pokojninskem računu v skladu z Allgemeines Pensionsgesetz – APG (Splošni pokojninski zakon), pristojna ustanova za vsak dopolnjen mesec zavarovanja v skladu z zakonodajo drugih držav članic upošteva tisti delež skupnega kredita, določenega na referenčni datum v skladu z APG, ki ustreza količniku med skupnim kreditom in številom mesecev zavarovanja, na katerih temelji skupni kredit.“;
in Annex VIII, under the heading ‘J.
v Prilogi VIII se besedilo pod naslovom „J.
‘Child benefit, guardian's payment (contributory) and increases of widow's (contributory) pension and widower's (contributory) pension payable in respect of children eligible under the Social Welfare Consolidation Act 2005 and subsequent amending legislation.’.
„Dajatev za otroka, plačilo za skrbnika (za katerega se plačujejo prispevki) ter dodatki k vdovski pokojnini (za katere se plačujejo prispevki) in vdovska pokojnina (za katero se plačuje prispevek), ki se izplačajo otrokom, upravičenim po Social Welfare Consolidation Act 2005 (Prečiščeni zakon o socialni varnosti iz leta 2005) in po zakonodaji o spremembi tega zakona.“
Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (ES) št. 593/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I)
o pravu, ki se uporablja za pogodbena obligacijska razmerja (Rim I)
The Community has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice.
Skupnost si je zastavila cilj ohranjati in razvijati območje svobode, varnosti in pravice.
For the progressive establishment of such an area, the Community is to adopt measures relating to judicial cooperation in civil matters with a cross-border impact to the extent necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market.
Za postopno vzpostavitev takšnega območja Skupnost sprejema ukrepe na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih zadevah s čezmejnimi posledicami, kolikor so potrebni za pravilno delovanje notranjega trga.
According to Article 65, point (b) of the Treaty, these measures are to include those promoting the compatibility of the rules applicable in the Member States concerning the conflict of laws and of jurisdiction.
V skladu s členom 65(b) Pogodbe so med temi ukrepi tudi tisti, ki spodbujajo združljivost predpisov, ki se uporabljajo v državah članicah glede kolizije zakonov in sporov o pristojnosti.
The European Council meeting in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999 endorsed the principle of mutual recognition of judgments and other decisions of judicial authorities as the cornerstone of judicial cooperation in civil matters and invited the Council and the Commission to adopt a programme of measures to implement that principle.
Evropski svet je na zasedanju v Tampereju dne 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 potrdil načelo vzajemnega priznavanja sodb in drugih odločb pravosodnih organov kot temelj pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih zadevah ter pozval Svet in Komisijo, naj sprejmeta program ukrepov za izvajanje tega načela.
On 30 November 2000 the Council adopted a joint Commission and Council programme of measures for implementation of the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in civil and commercial matters.
Svet je 30. novembra 2000 sprejel Skupni program ukrepov Komisije in Sveta za izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah.
The programme identifies measures relating to the harmonisation of conflict-of-law rules as those facilitating the mutual recognition of judgments.
Program ukrepe za usklajevanje kolizijskih pravil opredeljuje kot ukrepe, ki olajšujejo vzajemno priznavanje sodnih odločb.
The Hague Programme, adopted by the European Council on 5 November 2004, called for work to be pursued actively on the conflict-of-law rules regarding contractual obligations (Rome I).
S Haaškim programom, sprejetim dne 5. novembra 2004, je Evropski svet pozval k dejavnemu nadaljevanju dela na področju kolizijskih pravil za pogodbena obligacijska razmerja („Rim I“).
The proper functioning of the internal market creates a need, in order to improve the predictability of the outcome of litigation, certainty as to the law applicable and the free movement of judgments, for the conflict-of-law rules in the Member States to designate the same national law irrespective of the country of the court in which an action is brought.
Pravilno delovanje notranjega trga zaradi večje predvidljivosti izida pravde, gotovosti o tem, katero pravo se uporablja, ter prostega pretoka sodnih odločb zahteva, da kolizijska pravila držav članic določajo uporabo istega nacionalnega prava ne glede na državo sodišča, kjer je vložena tožba.
The substantive scope and the provisions of this Regulation should be consistent with Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Brussels I) and Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II).
Vsebinsko področje uporabe in določbe te uredbe morajo biti skladne z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah („Bruselj I“) in Uredbo (ES) št. 864/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. julija 2007 o pravu, ki se uporablja za nepogodbene obveznosti (Rim II).
Family relationships should cover parentage, marriage, affinity and collateral relatives.
Družinska razmerja bi morala zajemati starševstvo, zakonsko zvezo, svaštvo in sorodstvo v stranski vrsti.
The reference in Article 1(2) to relationships having comparable effects to marriage and other family relationships should be interpreted in accordance with the law of the Member State in which the court is seised.
Sklicevanje v členu 1(2) na razmerja, ki imajo primerljive učinke kot zakonska zveza, in na druga družinska razmerja bi se moralo razlagati v skladu s pravom države članice, v kateri je sodišče, pred katerim poteka postopek.
Obligations under bills of exchange, cheques and promissory notes and other negotiable instruments should also cover bills of lading to the extent that the obligations under the bill of lading arise out of its negotiable character.
Obveznosti iz menic, čekov in zadolžnic ter iz drugih prenosljivih vrednostnih papirjev bi morale zajemati tudi nakladnico, kolikor obveznosti iz nakladnice izhajajo iz njene prenosljive narave.
Obligations arising out of dealings prior to the conclusion of the contract are covered by Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 864/2007.
Obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz pogajanj pred sklenitvijo pogodbe, ureja člen 12 Uredbe (ES) št. 864/2007.
Such obligations should therefore be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Takšne obveznosti bi bilo treba zato izvzeti iz področja uporabe te uredbe.
The parties' freedom to choose the applicable law should be one of the cornerstones of the system of conflict-of-law rules in matters of contractual obligations.
Svoboda pogodbenih strank, da izberejo pravo, ki naj se uporablja, bi morala biti temelj sistema kolizijskih pravil na področju pogodbenih obligacijskih razmerij.
An agreement between the parties to confer on one or more courts or tribunals of a Member State exclusive jurisdiction to determine disputes under the contract should be one of the factors to be taken into account in determining whether a choice of law has been clearly demonstrated.
Pri ugotavljanju, ali je izbira prava, ki naj se uporablja, nedvoumna, bi bilo treba kot enega izmed elementov upoštevati dogovor med pogodbenima strankama, da ima za odločanje v sporih v zvezi s pogodbo izključno pristojnost eno ali več sodišč države članice.
This Regulation does not preclude parties from incorporating by reference into their contract a non-State body of law or an international convention.
Ta uredba pogodbenim strankam ne preprečuje, da se v pogodbi sklicujeta na nedržavno pravo ali mednarodno konvencijo.
Should the Community adopt, in an appropriate legal instrument, rules of substantive contract law, including standard terms and conditions, such instrument may provide that the parties may choose to apply those rules.
Če bi Skupnost v ustreznem pravnem aktu določila pravila materialnega pogodbenega prava, vključno s standardnimi splošnimi pogoji, ta akt lahko predvidi, da se pogodbeni stranki lahko odločita, da se uporabljajo ta pravila.
Where a choice of law is made and all other elements relevant to the situation are located in a country other than the country whose law has been chosen, the choice of law should not prejudice the application of provisions of the law of that country which cannot be derogated from by agreement.
Če je bilo pravo izbrano in se vsi drugi elementi, pomembni za primer, navezujejo na državo, katere prava pogodbeni stranki nista izbrali, izbira prava ne bi smela vplivati na uporabo določb prava te države, od katerih ni dovoljeno odstopanje z dogovorom.
This rule should apply whether or not the choice of law was accompanied by a choice of court or tribunal.
To pravilo bi se moralo uporabljati ne glede na to, ali je bilo poleg prava izbrano tudi sodišče.
Whereas no substantial change is intended as compared with Article 3(3) of the 1980 Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (the Rome Convention), the wording of this Regulation is aligned as far as possible with Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 864/2007.
Ker namen te uredbe ni vsebinsko odstopanje od člena 3(3) Konvencije iz leta 1980 o uporabi prava v pogodbenih obligacijskih razmerjih („Rimska konvencija“), bi moralo biti besedilo te uredbe, kolikor je mogoče, usklajeno s členom 14 Uredbe (ES) št. 864/2007.
To contribute to the general objective of this Regulation, legal certainty in the European judicial area, the conflict-of-law rules should be highly foreseeable.
Da bi kolizijska pravila prispevala k doseganju splošnega cilja te uredbe - k pravni varnosti v evropskem pravosodnem prostoru - bi morala biti zelo predvidljiva.
The courts should, however, retain a degree of discretion to determine the law that is most closely connected to the situation.
Vendar bi morala imeti sodišča kljub temu določeno stopnjo diskrecije pri določanju prava, ki je najtesneje povezano s primerom.
As far as the applicable law in the absence of choice is concerned, the concept of ‘provision of services’ and ‘sale of goods’ should be interpreted in the same way as when applying Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 in so far as sale of goods and provision of services are covered by that Regulation.
Če pogodbeni stranki nista izbrali prava, bi se v zvezi s pravom, ki naj se uporabi, koncepta „opravljanja storitev“ in „prodaje blaga“ morala razlagati na enak način kot pri uporabi člena 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 44/2001, če prodaja blaga in opravljanje storitev sodita na področje uporabe navedene uredbe.
Although franchise and distribution contracts are contracts for services, they are the subject of specific rules.
Čeprav so franšizne pogodbe in pogodbe o distribuciji pogodbe o storitvah, veljajo zanje posebna pravila.
As far as the applicable law in the absence of choice is concerned, multilateral systems should be those in which trading is conducted, such as regulated markets and multilateral trading facilities as referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments, regardless of whether or not they rely on a central counterparty.
Če pogodbeni stranki nista izbrali prava, bi morali biti v zvezi s pravom, ki naj se uporabi, večstranski sistemi tisti, v katerih poteka trgovanje, kot so na primer organizirani trgi in večstranski sistemi trgovanja iz člena 4 Direktive 2004/39/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o trgih finančnih instrumentov, ne glede na to, ali se opirajo na osrednjo nasprotno stranko ali ne.
Where there has been no choice of law, the applicable law should be determined in accordance with the rule specified for the particular type of contract.
Če pogodbeni stranki nista izbrali prava, bi bilo treba pravo, ki se uporabi, določiti v skladu s pravilom, ki velja za posamezno vrsto pogodbe.