natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The requested Central Authority shall, within 6 weeks from the date of receipt of the application, acknowledge receipt in the form set out in Annex 2, and inform the Central Authority of the requesting State what initial steps have been or will be taken to deal with the application, and may request any further necessary documents and information.
Zaprošeni osrednji organ v šestih tednih od datuma prejema zahtevka potrdi njegov prejem na obrazcu, določenem v Prilogi 2, in obvesti osrednji organ države prosilke, kakšni začetni ukrepi so že bili ali bodo sprejeti glede obravnave zahtevka, ter lahko zahteva dodatne potrebne listine in informacije.
Within the same 6-week period, the requested Central Authority shall provide to the requesting Central Authority the name and contact details of the person or unit responsible for responding to inquiries regarding the progress of the application.
V istem časovnem obdobju šestih tednov zaprošeni osrednji organ sporoči osrednjemu organu prosilcu ime in kontaktne podatke osebe ali enote, ki je pristojna odgovoriti na poizvedbe o poteku postopka.
Within 3 months after the acknowledgement, the requested Central Authority shall inform the requesting Central Authority of the status of the application.
V treh mesecih od potrditve prejema zaprošeni osrednji organ obvesti osrednji organ prosilec o poteku postopka.
the person or unit responsible for a particular case;
osebi ali enoti, ki je pristojna za posamezno zadevo;
the progress of the case;
napredku pri obravnavi zadeve
and shall provide timely responses to enquiries.
ter na vsa vprašanja odgovarjata pravočasno.
Central Authorities shall process a case as quickly as a proper consideration of the issues will allow.
Osrednji organi obravnavajo zadevo tako hitro, kot to dopušča strokovna preučitev vprašanj zadeve.
A requested Central Authority may refuse to process an application only if it is manifest that the requirements of the Convention are not fulfilled.
Zaprošeni osrednji organ lahko obravnavo zahtevka zavrne le, če je očitno, da zahteve iz Konvencije niso izpolnjene.
In such case, that Central Authority shall promptly inform the requesting Central Authority of its reasons for refusal.
V tem primeru osrednji organ nemudoma obvesti osrednji organ prosilec o razlogih za zavrnitev.
The requested Central Authority may not reject an application solely on the basis that additional documents or information are needed.
Zaprošeni osrednji organ ne sme zavrniti zahtevka samo zato, ker so potrebne dodatne listine ali dodatne informacije.
However, the requested Central Authority may ask the requesting Central Authority to provide these additional documents or information.
Vendar pa lahko od osrednjega organa prosilca zahteva, da priskrbi te dodatne listine ali informacije.
If the requesting Central Authority does not do so within 3 months or a longer period specified by the requested Central Authority, the requested Central Authority may decide that it will no longer process the application.
Če osrednji organ prosilec tega ne stori v treh mesecih ali v daljšem obdobju, ki ga določi zaprošeni osrednji organ, lahko slednji odloči, da zahtevka ne bo več obravnaval.
In this case, it shall inform the requesting Central Authority of this decision.
V tem primeru zaprošeni osrednji organ svojo odločitev sporoči osrednjemu organu prosilcu.
Means of communication
Način sporazumevanja
Any application made through Central Authorities of the Contracting States in accordance with this Chapter, and any document or information appended thereto or provided by a Central Authority, may not be challenged by the respondent by reason only of the medium or means of communication employed between the Central Authorities concerned.
Nasprotna stranka ne sme izpodbijati zahtevkov, ki so v skladu s tem poglavjem vloženi prek osrednjih organov držav pogodbenic, listin ali informacij, ki so zahtevku priloženi ali jih zagotovi osrednji organ, samo zaradi uporabljenega nosilca ali načina sporazumevanja med zadevnimi osrednjimi organi.
Effective access to procedures
Učinkovit dostop do pravnega varstva
The requested State shall provide applicants with effective access to procedures, including enforcement and appeal procedures, arising from applications under this Chapter.
Zaprošena država vlagateljem zahtevkov zagotovi učinkovit dostop do postopkov, vključno do izvršilnega postopka in pritožbenega postopka v zvezi z zahtevki iz tega poglavja.
To provide such effective access, the requested State shall provide free legal assistance in accordance with Articles 14 to 17 unless paragraph 3 applies.
Za zagotovitev takega učinkovitega dostopa zaprošena država v skladu s členi 14 do 17 nudi brezplačno pravno pomoč, razen če se uporabi odstavek 3.
The requested State shall not be obliged to provide such free legal assistance if and to the extent that the procedures of that State enable the applicant to make the case without the need for such assistance, and the Central Authority provides such services as are necessary free of charge.
Zaprošeni državi ni treba nuditi te brezplačne pravne pomoči, če in v obsegu, v katerem postopki te države vlagatelju omogočajo, da svoje zahtevke uveljavlja brez tovrstne pomoči, in osrednji organ vse potrebne storitve zagotovi brezplačno.
Entitlements to free legal assistance shall not be less than those available in equivalent domestic cases.
Pravica do brezplačne pravne pomoči ne sme biti manjša od pravice do brezplačne pravne pomoči v enakovrednih nacionalnih zadevah.
No security, bond or deposit, however described, shall be required to guarantee the payment of costs and expenses in proceedings under the Convention.
Za zagotovitev poravnave stroškov in izdatkov v postopkih v okviru Konvencije se ne sme zahtevati nikakršna varščina, jamstvo ali polog.
Free legal assistance for child support applications
Brezplačna pravna pomoč za zahtevke za preživnino otrok
The requested State shall provide free legal assistance in respect of all applications by a creditor under this Chapter concerning maintenance obligations arising from a parent-child relationship towards a person under the age of 21 years.
Zaprošena država zagotovi brezplačno pravno pomoč pri vseh zahtevkih upravičenca iz tega poglavja glede preživninskih obveznosti do osebe, mlajše od 21 let, ki izhajajo iz razmerja med staršem in otrokom.
Notwithstanding paragraph 1, the requested State may, in relation to applications other than those under Article 10(1)(a) and (b) and the cases covered by Article 20(4), refuse free legal assistance if it considers that, on the merits, the application or any appeal is manifestly unfounded.
Ne glede na odstavek 1 lahko zaprošena država v zvezi z zahtevki, ki ne izhajajo iz člena 10(1)(a) in (b), ter v primerih iz člena 20(4) zavrne brezplačno pravno pomoč, če po preučitvi dejanskega stanja meni, da zahtevek ali katero koli pravno sredstvo očitno ni utemeljeno.
Declaration to permit use of child-centred means test
Izjava o dovolitvi uporabe preskusa sredstev za otrokovo preživljanje
Notwithstanding Article 15(1), a State may declare, in accordance with Article 63, that it will provide free legal assistance in respect of applications other than under Article 10(1)(a) and (b) and the cases covered by Article 20(4), subject to a test based on an assessment of the means of the child.
Ne glede na člen 15(1) lahko država izjavi, da bo na podlagi preskusa, ki temelji na oceni finančnega položaja otroka, v skladu s členom 63 zagotovila brezplačno pravno pomoč pri zahtevkih, ki ne izhajajo iz člena 10(1)(a) in (b), ter v primerih iz člena 20(4).
A State shall, at the time of making such a declaration, provide information to the Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference on Private International Law concerning the manner in which the assessment of the child’s means will be carried out, including the financial criteria which would need to be met to satisfy the test.
Država bo Stalnemu uradu Haaške konference o mednarodnem zasebnem pravu sočasno z izjavo zagotovila podatke glede oblike, v kateri bo izvedena ocena finančnega položaja otroka, vključno s finančnimi merili, ki bodo morali biti izpolnjeni, da bi bil preskus uspešno opravljen.
An application referred to in paragraph 1, addressed to a State which has made the declaration referred to in that paragraph, shall include a formal attestation by the applicant stating that the child’s means meet the criteria referred to in paragraph 2.
Zahtevek iz odstavka 1, naslovljen na državo, ki je dala izjavo iz navedenega odstavka, vključuje formalno izjavo vlagatelja, da finančni položaj otroka ustreza merilom iz odstavka 2.
The requested State may only request further evidence of the child’s means if it has reasonable grounds to believe that the information provided by the applicant is inaccurate.
Zaprošena država lahko zahteva nadaljnje dokaze o finančnem položaju otroka le, če utemeljeno meni, da so podatki, ki jih je zagotovil vlagatelj zahtevka, netočni.
If the most favourable legal assistance provided for by the law of the requested State in respect of applications under this Chapter concerning maintenance obligations arising from a parent-child relationship towards a child is more favourable than that provided for under paragraphs 1 to 3, the most favourable legal assistance shall be provided.
Če je najugodnejša pravna pomoč, zagotovljena po pravu zaprošene države za zahtevke iz tega poglavja glede preživninske obveznosti, ki izhaja iz razmerja med staršem in otrokom, za otroka ugodnejša, kot jo zagotavljajo odstavki 1 do 3, se zagotovi najugodnejša pravna pomoč.
Applications not qualifying under Article 15 or Article 16
Zahtevki, ki ne izpolnjujejo meril iz členov 15 ali 16
In the case of all applications under this Convention other than those under Article 15 or Article 16:
Kadar gre za zahtevke v okviru te konvencije, ki ne izhajajo iz členov 15 ali 16:
the provision of free legal assistance may be made subject to a means or a merits test;
so lahko določbe brezplačne pravne pomoči odvisne od preskusa finančnega položaja vlagatelja zahtevka ali utemeljenosti;
an applicant, who in the State of origin has benefited from free legal assistance, shall be entitled, in any proceedings for recognition or enforcement, to benefit, at least to the same extent, from free legal assistance as provided for by the law of the State addressed under the same circumstances.
je vlagatelj zahtevka, ki mu je bila v državi izvora odobrena brezplačna pravna pomoč, v postopku priznanja ali izvršitve upravičen vsaj do enakega obsega brezplačne pravne pomoči, kot jo v enakih okoliščinah dopušča pravo države naslovnice.
RESTRICTIONS ON BRINGING PROCEEDINGS
OMEJITVE GLEDE ZAČETKA POSTOPKOV
Limit on proceedings
Omejitev postopkov
Where a decision is made in a Contracting State where the creditor is habitually resident, proceedings to modify the decision or to make a new decision cannot be brought by the debtor in any other Contracting State as long as the creditor remains habitually resident in the State where the decision was made.
Če je odločba izdana v državi pogodbenici, v kateri ima upravičenec običajno prebivališče, zavezanec ne more vložiti zahtevka za spremembo odločbe ali izdajo nove odločbe v nobeni drugi državi pogodbenici, dokler ima upravičenec običajno prebivališče v državi, v kateri je bila izdana odločba.
where, except in disputes relating to maintenance obligations in respect of children, there is agreement in writing between the parties to the jurisdiction of that other Contracting State;
če med strankama obstaja pisni dogovor o pristojnosti te druge države pogodbenice, razen v sporih v zvezi s preživninskimi obveznostmi v korist otrok;
where the creditor submits to the jurisdiction of that other Contracting State either expressly or by defending on the merits of the case without objecting to the jurisdiction at the first available opportunity;
če se upravičenec spusti v postopek pred sodiščem te druge države pogodbenice izrecno ali pri obravnavanju zadeve ob prvi priložnosti ne ugovarja njeni pristojnosti;
where the competent authority in the State of origin cannot, or refuses to, exercise jurisdiction to modify the decision or make a new decision; or
če pristojni organ v državi izvora ne more izvajati pristojnosti za spremembo odločbe ali izdajo nove odločbe ali to pristojnost zavrne ali
where the decision made in the State of origin cannot be recognised or declared enforceable in the Contracting State where proceedings to modify the decision or make a new decision are contemplated.
če odločbe, izdane v državi izvora, ni mogoče priznati ali razglasiti za izvršljivo v državi pogodbenici, v kateri se preučuje procesne možnosti za izdajo nove ali spremenjene odločbe.
RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT
PRIZNAVANJE IN IZVRŠITEV
Scope of the Chapter
Področje uporabe poglavja
This Chapter shall apply to a decision rendered by a judicial or administrative authority in respect of a maintenance obligation.
To poglavje se uporablja za odločbe, ki jih glede preživninske obveznosti izda sodni ali upravni organ.
The term ‘decision’ also includes a settlement or agreement concluded before or approved by such an authority.
Izraz „odločba“ obsega tudi poravnavo ali sporazum, sklenjen pred takšnim organom ali z njegove strani potrjen.
A decision may include automatic adjustment by indexation and a requirement to pay arrears, retroactive maintenance or interest and a determination of costs or expenses.
Odločba lahko vključuje samodejno indeksacijo in zahtevo za plačilo izostalih plačil, preživnine za nazaj ali obresti in določitev stroškov.
If a decision does not relate solely to a maintenance obligation, the effect of this Chapter is limited to the parts of the decision which concern maintenance obligations.
Če odločba ne ureja le preživninske obveznosti, je uporaba tega poglavja omejena na dele odločbe, ki se nanašajo na preživninske obveznosti.
For the purpose of paragraph 1, ‘administrative authority’ means a public body whose decisions, under the law of the State where it is established:
Za namene odstavka 1 „upravni organ“ pomeni organ javne uprave, katerega odločbe so po pravu države, v kateri je ustanovljen:
may be made the subject of an appeal to or review by a judicial authority; and
lahko predmet pravnih sredstev, ki jih obravnava sodni organ, ter
have a similar force and effect to a decision of a judicial authority on the same matter.
imajo podobno veljavnost in učinek kot odločba sodnega organa v isti zadevi.
This Chapter also applies to maintenance arrangements in accordance with Article 30.
To poglavje se uporablja tudi za sporazume o preživnini v skladu s členom 30.
The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to a request for recognition and enforcement made directly to a competent authority of the State addressed in accordance with Article 37.
Določbe tega poglavja se uporabljajo za zahtevke za priznanje in izvršitev, vložene neposredno pri pristojnem organu države naslovnice v skladu s členom 37.
Bases for recognition and enforcement
Podlaga za priznavanje in izvršitev
A decision made in one Contracting State (‘the State of origin’) shall be recognised and enforced in other Contracting States if:
Odločba, izdana v eni državi pogodbenici (v nadaljnjem besedilu: država izvora), se prizna in izvrši v drugih državah pogodbenicah, če:
the respondent was habitually resident in the State of origin at the time proceedings were instituted;
je imela nasprotna stranka v času uvedbe postopka običajno prebivališče v državi izvora;
the respondent has submitted to the jurisdiction either expressly or by defending on the merits of the case without objecting to the jurisdiction at the first available opportunity;
se je nasprotna stranka spustila v postopek izrecno ali če pri obravnavanju zadeve ni ugovarjala pristojnosti;
the creditor was habitually resident in the State of origin at the time proceedings were instituted;
je imel upravičenec v času uvedbe postopka običajno prebivališče v državi izvora;
the child for whom maintenance was ordered was habitually resident in the State of origin at the time proceedings were instituted, provided that the respondent has lived with the child in that State or has resided in that State and provided support for the child there;
je imel otrok, za katerega je bila določena preživnina, v času uvedbe postopka običajno prebivališče v državi izvora, pod pogojem, da je nasprotna stranka živela z otrokom v navedeni državi ali prebivala v navedeni državi in tam otroka tudi preživljala;
except in disputes relating to maintenance obligations in respect of children, there has been agreement to the jurisdiction in writing by the parties; or
med strankama obstaja pisni dogovor o pristojnosti, razen v sporih v zvezi s preživninskimi obveznostmi v korist otrok, ali
the decision was made by an authority exercising jurisdiction on a matter of personal status or parental responsibility, unless that jurisdiction was based solely on the nationality of one of the parties.
je odločbo izdal organ, ki je pristojen za postopke v zvezi s statusom osebe ali starševske odgovornosti, razen če je navedena pristojnost temeljila izključno na državljanstvu ene od strank.
A Contracting State may make a reservation, in accordance with Article 62, in respect of paragraph 1(c), (e) or (f).
Država pogodbenica lahko v skladu s členom 62 vloži pridržek glede odstavka 1(c), (e) ali (f).
A Contracting State making a reservation under paragraph 2 shall recognise and enforce a decision if its law would in similar factual circumstances confer or would have conferred jurisdiction on its authorities to make such a decision.
Država pogodbenica, ki v okviru odstavka 2 vloži pridržek, prizna in izvrši odločbo, če njeno pravo v podobnih dejanskih okoliščinah prenese ali bi preneslo pristojnost za izdajo takšne odločitve na njene organe.
A Contracting State shall, if recognition of a decision is not possible as a result of a reservation under paragraph 2, and if the debtor is habitually resident in that State, take all appropriate measures to establish a decision for the benefit of the creditor.
Če priznanje odločbe kot posledica pridržka v okviru odstavka 2 ni mogoče in če ima zavezanec običajno prebivališče v državi pogodbenici, navedena država sprejme vse ustrezne ukrepe za izdajo odločbe v korist upravičenca.
The preceding sentence shall not apply to direct requests for recognition and enforcement under Article 19(5) or to claims for support referred to in Article 2(1)(b).
Predhodni stavek se ne uporablja za neposredne zahtevke za priznanje in izvršitev v okviru člena 19(5) ali za preživninske zahtevke iz člena 2(1)(b).
A decision in favour of a child under the age of 18 years which cannot be recognised by virtue only of a reservation in respect of paragraph 1(c), (e) or (f) shall be accepted as establishing the eligibility of that child for maintenance in the State addressed.
Odločba v korist otroka, mlajšega od 18 let, ki je ni mogoče priznati samo zaradi pridržka v skladu z odstavkom 1(c), (e) ali (f), se upošteva kot odločba o upravičenosti navedenega otroka do preživnine v državi naslovnici.
A decision shall be recognised only if it has effect in the State of origin, and shall be enforced only if it is enforceable in the State of origin.
Odločba se prizna le, če ima učinek v državi izvora, in se izvrši le, če je v državi izvora izvršljiva.
Severability and partial recognition and enforcement
Ločljivost in delno priznavanje in izvršitev
If the State addressed is unable to recognise or enforce the whole of the decision, it shall recognise or enforce any severable part of the decision which can be so recognised or enforced.
Če država naslovnica ne more priznati ali izvršiti celotne odločbe, prizna ali izvrši ločljivi del odločbe, ki se ga lahko prizna ali izvrši.
Partial recognition or enforcement of a decision can always be applied for.
Delno priznanje ali izvršitev odločbe se lahko vedno zahtevata.
Grounds for refusing recognition and enforcement
Podlaga za zavrnitev priznanja ali izvršitve
Recognition and enforcement of a decision may be refused if:
Priznanje ali izvršitev odločbe je mogoče zavrniti, če:
recognition and enforcement of the decision is manifestly incompatible with the public policy (‘ordre public’) of the State addressed;
sta priznanje in izvršitev odločbe v očitnem neskladju z javnim redom („ordre public“) države naslovnice;
the decision was obtained by fraud in connection with a matter of procedure;
je bila odločba izdana na podlagi namerne kršitve postopkovnih določb;
proceedings between the same parties and having the same purpose are pending before an authority of the State addressed and those proceedings were the first to be instituted;
postopek v isti zadevi med istima strankama že poteka pred organom države naslovnice in je bil navedeni postopek uveden prvi;
the decision is incompatible with a decision rendered between the same parties and having the same purpose, either in the State addressed or in another State, provided that this latter decision fulfils the conditions necessary for its recognition and enforcement in the State addressed;
je odločba v neskladju z odločbo, izdano v isti zadevi med istima strankama v državi naslovnici ali drugi državi, če ta kasneje izdana odločba izpolnjuje pogoje, potrebne za njeno priznanje in izvršitev v državi naslovnici;
in a case where the respondent has neither appeared nor was represented in proceedings in the State of origin:
se nasprotna stranka ni spustila v postopek v državi izvora in je tudi nihče ni zastopal:
when the law of the State of origin provides for notice of proceedings, the respondent did not have proper notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to be heard; or
če pravo države izvora določa obveznost obveščanja o poteku postopka, pa nasprotna stranka ni bila primerno obveščena o poteku postopka in možnosti, da se izjavi, ali
when the law of the State of origin does not provide for notice of the proceedings, the respondent did not have proper notice of the decision and an opportunity to challenge or appeal it on fact and law; or
če pravo države izvora ne določa obveznosti obveščanja o poteku postopka, pa nasprotna stranka ni bila primerno obveščena o odločbi in možnosti, da vloži pravno sredstvo zaradi napačne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja in nepravilne uporabe prava, ali
the decision was made in violation of Article 18.
je bila odločba sprejeta s kršitvijo člena 18.
Procedure on an application for recognition and enforcement
Postopek v zvezi z zahtevkom za priznanje in izvršitev
Subject to the provisions of the Convention, the procedures for recognition and enforcement shall be governed by the law of the State addressed.
Ob upoštevanju določb Konvencije postopke priznanja in izvršitve ureja pravo države naslovnice.
Where an application for recognition and enforcement of a decision has been made through Central Authorities in accordance with Chapter III, the requested Central Authority shall promptly either:
Kadar je zahtevek za priznanje in izvršitev odločbe vložen pri osrednjih organih v skladu s poglavjem III, zaprošeni osrednji organ nemudoma:
refer the application to the competent authority which shall without delay declare the decision enforceable or register the decision for enforcement; or
odstopi zahtevek pristojnemu organu, ki brez odlašanja razglasi odločbo za izvršljivo ali zavede odločbo za izvršitev, ali
if it is the competent authority take such steps itself.
če je za to pristojen, sam opravi navedena dejanja.
Where the request is made directly to a competent authority in the State addressed in accordance with Article 19(5), that authority shall without delay declare the decision enforceable or register the decision for enforcement.
Kadar je zahtevek vložen neposredno pri pristojnem organu v državi naslovnici v skladu s členom 19(5), navedeni organ brez odlašanja razglasi odločbo za izvršljivo ali evidentira odločbo za izvršitev.
A declaration or registration may be refused only on the ground set out in Article 22(a).
Razglasitev ali evidentiranje se lahko zavrneta le iz razlogov, določenih v členu 22(a).
At this stage neither the applicant nor the respondent is entitled to make any submissions.
Na tej stopnji ne vlagatelj zahtevka ne nasprotna stranka nista upravičena do nikakršne predložitve.