natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Including blends above B20 in the definition of the product concerned had no impact whatsoever on the findings made for companies investigated which are not producing and exporting this product type.
Vključitev mešanic nad B20 v opredelitev zadevnega izdelka nikakor ni vplivala na ugotovitve v zvezi s preiskanimi družbami, ki ne proizvajajo in ne izvažajo te vrste izdelka.
The allegation of the party according to which the rationale of a Court Judgment [10] also applies to the current proceeding and that biodiesel that is not part of blends in very high content cannot be subject to the scope of the investigation is also not founded.
Navedba stranke, da utemeljitev iz sodbe Sodišča [10] velja tudi za sedanji postopek in da biodizla, ki ni del mešanic z zelo visoko vsebnostjo biodizla, ni mogoče vključiti v obseg preiskave, prav tako ni utemeljena.
In fact, for each company investigated, any injury and subsidy margins will exactly match the product concerned and the like product for which subsidy and injury findings were established, namely the relevant products types that contain biodiesel that were sold domestically and exported to the Community by that company.
Za vsako preiskano družbo bodo vse stopnje škode in subvencije dejansko natančno ustrezale zadevnemu izdelku in podobnemu izdelku, za katera so bile sprejete ugotovitve o subvencioniranju in škodi, in sicer za ustrezne vrste izdelka, ki vsebujejo biodizel ter jih je ta družba prodajala na notranjem trgu in izvažala v Skupnost.
Also, the judgment which is invoked by the operator concerned a review of existing anti-dumping measures resulting in their extension to other products than the product concerned, which is not the case in the current investigation.
Mnenje zadevnega nosilca dejavnosti je bilo povezano s pregledom obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov, katerega rezultat je bila razširitev ukrepov na druge izdelke poleg zadevnega izdelka, kar pa ne velja za sedanjo preiskavo.
Although it is considered that the examples provided in a questionnaire intended to collect data for the purpose of an investigation cannot be used to make assumptions as to the conclusion of the investigation, it is noteworthy that the Commission cannot know in advance, namely before its on-spot investigation takes place, which types of products will be produced and sold in the domestic market and for export by the companies concerned at the moment of the drafting of the questionnaire.
Čeprav se šteje, da primeri iz vprašalnika, namenjeni zbiranju podatkov za preiskavo, ne morejo biti podlaga domnevam glede sklepa preiskave, je treba omeniti, da Komisija ob pripravi osnutka vprašalnika ne more vnaprej, tj. pred izvajanjem preiskave na kraju samem, vedeti, katere vrste izdelkov bodo zadevne družbe proizvajale in prodajale na notranjem trgu ter jih izvažale.
According to Article 1 of the basic Regulation, the relevant product types to include in the scope of an anti-subsidy investigation are those considered to be subsidized from a countervailable subsidy.
V skladu s členom 1 osnovne uredbe so ustrezne vrste izdelkov, ki jih je treba vključiti v obseg protisubvencijske preiskave, tiste, za katere se šteje, da so subvencionirane s subvencijami, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi.
In such case a countervailing duty may be imposed for the purpose of offsetting any subsidy granted directly and indirectly for the manufacture, production, export or transport of any product.
V takem primeru se lahko izravnalna dajatev uvede zaradi kompenzacije kakršne koli neposredno ali posredno dodeljene subvencije za izdelavo, proizvodnjo, izvoz ali prevoz katerega koli izdelka.
It is also considered that B100 should not be excluded from the product definition.
Zato se šteje, da se izdelki B100 ne smejo izključiti iz opredelitve izdelka.
CODE), in particular Title 26, $40A, point (d), which clearly defines the term biodiesel, that the whole subsidy scheme was implemented to support the biodiesel industry in the USA.
CODE), zlasti naslova 26, odstavka 40, točke (d), ki jasno opredeljuje izraz biodizel, je razvidno, da je bila celotna subvencijska shema uvedena za podporo industriji biodizla v ZDA.
Secondly, because during the verification visit at the premises of the USG, it appeared that biodiesel even when blended outside the USA by a company having a subsidiary in the USA could benefit from the Federal biodiesel Tax credit of USD 1 per gallon in the USA.
Drugič, ker se je med preveritvenim obiskom v prostorih ameriške vlade zdelo, da so tudi za biodizel, ki ga je zunaj ZDA mešala družba z odvisno družbo v ZDA, veljale ugodnosti iz zvezne sheme davčnih olajšav v višini 1 USD na galono v ZDA.
The investigation has also showed that the production of pure biodiesel by any producer in the USA triggers the issuance of producer certificate mentioned in recital (51) of the provisional Regulation.
S preiskavo je bilo tudi ugotovljeno, da se za čisti biodizel, ki ga proizvede kateri koli proizvajalec v ZDA, izda potrdilo proizvajalca iz uvodne izjave (51) začasne uredbe.
This certificate is transferable and must be presented to the US Government when the claim for subsidy is introduced.
To potrdilo je prenosljivo in se mora predložiti vladi ZDA ob vložitvi zahtevka za subvencijo.
Based on the above facts and considerations, it is confirmed that all types of biodiesel and the biodiesel in the blends covered by this investigation, namely pure biodiesel (B100) and blends above B20, despite possible differences in terms of raw material used for the production, or variances in the production process, have the same or very similar basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and are used for the same purposes.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenih dejstev in premislekov je potrjeno, da imajo vse vrste biodizla in biodizel v mešanicah, ki so vključeni v to preiskavo, tj. čisti biodizel (B100) in mešanice nad B20, kljub mogočim razlikam v surovinah, uporabljenih pri proizvodnji, ali razlikam v proizvodnem postopku enake ali zelo podobne osnovne fizikalne, kemične in tehnične lastnosti ter se uporabljajo v enake namene.
It was provisionally found that the products produced and sold on the domestic market of the USA, which are covered by this investigation, have similar basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and uses as those exported from this country to the Community market.
Začasno je bilo ugotovljeno, da imajo izdelki, proizvedeni in prodani na notranjem trgu ZDA, ki so vključeni v to preiskavo, podobne osnovne fizikalne, kemične in tehnične lastnosti ter uporabo kot izdelki, ki se iz ZDA izvažajo na trg Skupnosti.
Similarly, the products manufactured by the Community industry and sold on the Community market have similar basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and uses when compared to those exported to the Community from the country concerned.
Podobno imajo izdelki, ki jih proizvajalci Skupnosti proizvajajo in prodajajo na trgu Skupnosti, podobne osnovne fizikalne, kemične in tehnične lastnosti ter uporabo kot izdelki, ki se iz zadevne države izvažajo v Skupnost.
Therefore no differences were found between the various types of the product concerned and the Community product types sold on the Community market which would lead to the conclusion that the product types produced and sold on the Community market are not like products, sharing the same or very similar basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics as to the types of the product concerned produced in the USA and exported to the Community.
Med različnimi vrstami zadevnega izdelka in vrstami izdelka, ki se prodajajo na trgu Skupnosti, torej niso bile ugotovljene nobene razlike, na podlagi katerih bi se lahko sklenilo, da izdelki, ki se proizvajajo in prodajajo na trgu Skupnosti, niso podobni izdelki z enakimi ali zelo podobnimi osnovnimi fizikalnimi, kemičnimi in tehničnimi lastnostmi, kot jih imajo vrste zadevnega izdelka, ki se proizvajajo v ZDA in izvažajo v Skupnost.
It was therefore concluded that all types of biodiesel covered by this investigation are considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(5) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se je sklenilo, da se vse vrste biodizla, ki jih zadeva ta preiskava, obravnavajo kot podobni izdelki v smislu člena 1(5) osnovne uredbe.
One party claimed that the definition of the like product is intricately linked to the identification of the product concerned and must be established in term of physical characteristics and end-use of the product.
Ena od strank je trdila, da je opredelitev podobnega izdelka neločljivo povezana z opredelitvijo zadevnega izdelka ter jo je treba oblikovati v smislu fizikalnih lastnosti in končne uporabe izdelka.
They basically said that B20 is not used for consumption in the EU but rather an even lower blend which is B5.
Dejansko je menila, da se v EU za potrošnjo ne uporablja B20, ampak mešanica s še nižjo vsebnostjo biodizla, tj. B5.
Hence the like product was wrongly defined.
Zato je bil podobni izdelek napačno opredeljen.
They also claimed that the definition of the product concerned cannot be changed whilst maintaining a different like product.
Trdila je tudi, da opredelitve zadevnega izdelka ni mogoče spremeniti, če se hkrati ohrani drugačen podobni izdelek.
As it clearly appears in recital (31) to (37) of the provisional Regulation, the definition of the like product is linked to the identification of the product concerned and was mainly established in term of physical characteristics of the product.
Kot je jasno navedeno v uvodnih izjavah od (31) do (37) začasne uredbe, je opredelitev podobnega izdelka povezana z opredelitvijo zadevnega izdelka ter je bila oblikovana zlasti v smislu njegovih fizikalnih lastnosti.
The actual end-use of the products was also taken into account and it was considered that the threshold of B20 should also be maintained for the definition of the like product.
Upoštevala se je tudi dejanska končna uporaba izdelkov, pri čemer je bilo ugotovljeno, da je treba tudi za opredelitev podobnega izdelka ohraniti prag B20.
In this case, the number of product types covered by the definition of the like product has also been reduced to match with the definition of the product concerned.
V tem primeru se je za ujemanje z opredelitvijo zadevnega izdelka zmanjšalo tudi število vrst izdelka, ki jih vključuje podobni izdelek.
Hence, the claims of the parties that the definition of the like product was incorrect have to be rejected and the provisional definition of the like product can be confirmed.
Zato je treba trditve strank, da je bila opredelitev podobnega izdelka nepravilna, zavrniti, začasna opredelitev podobnega izdelka pa se lahko potrdi.
One company claimed that the reasons set out in recital 9 of the Provisional Regulation for its exclusion from the sample were known to the Commission when it originally chose the sample.
Ena družba je trdila, da so bili razlogi za njeno izključitev iz vzorca, navedeni v uvodni izjavi 9 začasne uredbe, Komisiji znani ob prvotni izbiri vzorca.
On this basis, the company should not have been excluded from the sample.
Zato družba ne bi smela biti izključena iz vzorca.
In regard to this claim, it is noted that, whether or not the company is included in the sample has no material impact on the company in terms of the outcome of the investigation.
V zvezi s to trditvijo se opozarja, da to, ali je družba vključena v vzorec ali ne, ne vpliva bistveno na rezultate preiskave.
If it were to be included in the sample, the company would have its own individual countervailing duty rate established as was done at provisional stage even though the company was excluded from the sample.
Čeprav je bila družba izključena iz vzorca, je bila zanjo v začasni preiskavi določena individualna stopnja izravnalne dajatve, kakor bi bila, če bi bila družba vključena v vzorec.
The current Regulation also establishes an individual countervailing duty rate for the company.
Ta uredba določa tudi individualno stopnjo izravnalne dajatve za to družbo.
Following final disclosure of these findings, the company claimed that its ‘de-facto exclusion’ from the sampled exporters prevented it from some substantive rights, including rights resulting from specific calculations as applied to data provided by the sampled exporters.
Po dokončnem razkritju teh ugotovitev je družba trdila, da so ji bile zaradi „dejanske“ izključitve iz vzorca izvoznikov odvzete nekatere bistvene pravice, vključno s pravicami, povezanimi s posebnimi izračuni, ki se uporabljajo za podatke, ki jih predložijo vzorčeni izvozniki.
In reply to this, it is noted that a specific calculation was made of the level of subsidisation of this company.
V odgovoru na to se opozarja, da se je poseben izračun uporabil za določitev stopnje subvencioniranja za to družbo.
In regard to the injury margin for this company, this was established as set out in recitals (173) to (175) below, i.e. on the basis of facts available under Article 28 of the basic Regulation given that the company did not provide the requested information in regard to its export sales and resales in the Community.
Stopnja škode za to družbo je bila določena, kakor je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah od (167) do (169), tj. na podlagi dostopnih dejstev v skladu s členom 28 osnovne uredbe glede na to, da družba ni predložila zahtevanih informacij o izvozu in nadaljnji prodaji v Skupnosti.
In these circumstances, the company’s claim is rejected.
Zato je bila trditev družbe zavrnjena.
One company claimed that the countervailing duty rate appeared to have been calculated on the basis of domestic sales in addition to export sales.
Ena družba je trdila, da se je zdelo, da je bila podlaga za izračun izravnalne dajatve poleg izvoza še domača prodaja.
The company asked that the calculations be corrected accordingly.
Družba je zahtevala, da se izračun ustrezno popravi.
In regard to this claim, it is noted that all of the subsidy schemes that are being countervailed have been found to be domestic subsidies, i.e. they equally benefit domestic as well as export sales.
V zvezi s to trditvijo se opozarja, da je bilo ugotovljeno, da so vse subvencijske sheme, ki se jih izravnava, domače subvencije, tj. se uporabljajo tako za domačo prodajo kot za izvoz.
In line with standard practice the amount of benefit from each scheme in the IP has been allocated over total sales of the product concerned (i.e. domestic plus export sales).
V skladu s standardno prakso so bile subvencije v OP v okviru vsake posamezne sheme dodeljene glede na celotno prodajo zadevnega izdelka (tj. domačo prodajo in izvoz).
The company’s claim is therefore rejected.
Trditev družbe se zato zavrne.
This company as well as another company also pointed out that the CIF values used for calculating the countervailing duty rate are not the same as the ones used for the injury and dumping calculations.
Ta družba ter ena druga družba sta prav tako poudarili, da vrednosti CIF, uporabljene za izračun stopnje izravnalne dajatve, niso bile iste kot vrednosti, uporabljene za izračun škode in dampinga.
The companies consider that, in order to ensure consistency, the correct CIF values which have been used for the dumping and injury calculations should also be used for the countervailing duty rate calculations.
Družbi menita, da bi zaradi doslednosti morale biti za izračun stopnje izravnalne dajatve prav tako uporabljene pravilne vrednosti CIF, ki so bile uporabljene za izračun dampinga in škode.
In regard, to this claim, it must again be pointed out that, as mentioned in recital (51) above, all of the subsidy schemes that are being countervailed have been found to be domestic subsidies.
V zvezi s to trditvijo se ponovno poudarja, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (50), da so vse subvencijske sheme, ki se jih izravnava, domače subvencije.
In these circumstances, the denominator used in establishing the benefit in the IP is total sales unlike in anti-dumping proceedings where the denominator is export sales to the EU only.
Zato je imenovalec, ki se uporablja za izračun ugodnosti v OP, celotna prodaja, v nasprotju s protidampinškim postopkom, v katerem je imenovalec le izvoz v EU.
In these circumstances, this claim is rejected.
Trditev se zato zavrne.
A number of companies and the National Biodiesel Board (NBB) argued that a countervailing duty should not be levied on imports of B100 on the grounds that the subsidy and injury margins have been calculated without including sales of B100.
Številne družbe in nacionalni odbor za biodizel so trdili, da se izravnalna dajatev ne bi smela uporabljati za uvoz B100, ker pri izračunu stopnje subvencije in stopnje škode ni bila upoštevana prodaja B100.
In regard to this claim, it is noted that sales of B100 produced by the sampled companies have been taken into account in calculating the amount of countervailable subsidies as well as in the calculation of the injury margin.
V zvezi s to trditvijo se opozarja, da je bila prodaja B100, ki ga proizvajajo vzorčene družbe, upoštevana pri izračunu zneska subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, ter pri izračunu stopnje škode.
One company claimed that the amount of benefit that it received under the federal excise tax/income tax credit in the investigation period (IP), would be less than USD 1 per gallon if the benefit were to be calculated by spreading it over the total sales volume in the IP.
Ena družba je trdila, da je bil znesek ugodnosti, ki jih je v OP prejela v okviru zveznih olajšav pri plačilu trošarine oziroma davčnih olajšav na prihodek, nižji od 1 USD na galono, če se ugodnosti računajo glede na celoten obseg prodaje v OP.
In regard to the benefit received under the excise tax/income tax credit scheme, this was calculated, as stated in recital (59) of the provisional Regulation, on the basis of USD 1 per gallon of neat biodiesel sold in the IP, whether sold as pure biodiesel (B100) or in a blend.
Ugodnosti, prejete v okviru sheme olajšav pri plačilu trošarine oziroma davčnih olajšav na prihodek, so bile - kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (59) - izračunane na osnovi 1 USD na galono čistega biodizla, ki je bil prodan v OP kot čisti biodizel (B100) ali kot mešanica.
This benefit was reflected in the level of provisional countervailing duty imposed.
Te ugodnosti so bile upoštevane pri izračunu stopnje začasne izravnalne dajatve.
The provisional duty, and indeed the definitive duty now to be imposed by this regulation, provides that the countervailing duty on blends shall be applicable in proportion in the blend of the total content of biodiesel.
Začasna stopnja in dokončna stopnja, ki jo uvaja ta uredba, pomenita, da je treba izravnalno dajatev za mešanice uporabljati glede na razmerje skupne vsebnosti biodizla v mešanici.
In these circumstances, it is considered that a duty based on USD 1 per gallon of neat biodiesel correctly reflects the benefit in the IP as a lesser duty is imposed on, for example, imports of B99 given that it contains less biodiesel.
Zato se šteje, da dajatev na osnovi 1 USD za galono čistega biodizla pravilno odraža ugodnosti, prejete v OP, ker je na primer za uvoz B99 uvedena nižja dajatev, saj je vsebnost biodizla v B99 manjša.
In these circumstances, the company’ claim is rejected.
Zato je bila trditev družbe zavrnjena.
A number of companies and the NBB claimed that, as no federal excise tax/income tax credit is available on sales of B100, there is no basis to consider that such sales have benefited from this tax credit.
Številne družbe in nacionalni odbor za biodizel so trdili, da zaradi nerazpoložljivosti zveznih olajšav pri plačilu trošarine oziroma davčnih olajšav na prihodek ni mogoče sklepati, da so bile pri prodaji B100 prejete ugodnosti.
One of these companies argued in particular that, for their sales of B100 in the IP, it had not been demonstrated that they had been the indirect recipient of the USD 1 per gallon tax credit.
Ena od družb je trdila zlasti, da ni bilo dokazano, da bi za prodajo B100 v OP posredno prejela davčno olajšavo v višini 1 USD na galono.
In addressing these claims, it should be recalled that the US Code provides that the biodiesel mixture credit will not be granted unless the company (blender) that makes the mixture of biodiesel and mineral diesel obtains a certificate (‘Certificate for Biodiesel’) from the producer of the biodiesel in which the producer certifies the quantity of biodiesel to which the certificate relates.
Pri proučitvi teh trditev je treba opozoriti, da se v skladu z Zakonikom ZDA olajšava za mešanico biodizla odobri le, če družba, ki pripravlja mešanice biodizla in mineralnega dizla, dobi potrdilo („potrdilo za biodizel“) proizvajalca biodizla, v katerem proizvajalec potrdi količino biodizla, na katerega se potrdilo nanaša.
The biodiesel certificate is transferable, entitling the holder to a USD 1 per gallon tax credit for the number of gallons of biodiesel used by the claimant in producing any biodiesel mixture.
To potrdilo za biodizel je prenosljivo in imetnika upravičuje do davčne olajšave v višini 1 USD na galono za toliko galon biodizla, kolikor jih upravičenec uporabi pri pripravi katere koli mešanice biodizla.
In regard to sales of B100 by the investigated companies in the IP, there is a benefit to the companies as the biodiesel certificate confers a right to a USD 1 per gallon tax credit.
Preiskane družbe so pri prodaji B100 v OP prejele ugodnosti, saj potrdilo za biodizel daje pravico do davčne olajšave v višini 1USD na galono.
Following final disclosure, some parties argued that the benefit from the blender’s tax credit is obtained by the blender of the biodiesel and that there has been no determination that for sales of pure biodiesel (B100), the benefit would be received by the producer/seller of the B100.
Po dokončnem razkritju so nekatere stranke trdile, da davčne olajšave pripadajo pripravljavcu mešanice biodizla in da ni bilo ugotovljeno, da bi bil proizvajalec oziroma prodajalec B100 pri prodaji čistega biodizla (B100) upravičen do olajšave.
In reply to this, it should be noted that, as explained above, the biodiesel certificate is transferable.
V odgovor na to je treba opozoriti, da je potrdilo za biodizel prenosljivo, kakor je pojasnjeno zgoraj.
In effect, therefore, the holder of the certificate knows that the certificate has a value of USD 1 per gallon.
Torej imetnik potrdila ve, da je to vredno 1 USD na galono.
The USG considered that, as it was stated in recital 44 of the Provisional Regulation that in order to be eligible for the biodiesel mixture credit a company must create a mixture of biodiesel and diesel fuel, the amount of benefit should not be established on the basis of pure biodiesel or in a blend as stated in recital (59) of the Provisional Regulation.
Ameriška vlada je menila, da znesek davčne olajšave ne bi smel biti določen na podlagi čistega biodizla ali biodizla v mešanici, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (59) začasne uredbe, saj je pogoj za upravičenost do olajšave za mešanico biodizla, da družba pripravlja mešanice biodizla in dizelskega goriva, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 44 začasne uredbe.
In this regard, it is pointed out that, for the reasons mentioned in recital (58) above and as addressed in recitals (54) to (55) of the Provisional Regulation, it is considered that all biodiesel is subsidised.
V zvezi s tem se opozarja, da se iz razlogov iz uvodne izjave (58) ter uvodnih izjav (54) in (55) začasne uredbe šteje, da so subvencionirane vse vrste biodizla.
In these circumstances, it is considered that sales of B100 have been found to confer a benefit to the producers of this product and the claims in recitals (57) to (60) are therefore rejected.
V takšnih okoliščinah se šteje, da je bilo ugotovljeno, da so proizvajalci B100 za prodajo tega izdelka prejemali subvencije, zaradi česar se trditve iz uvodnih izjav od (56) do (59) zavrnejo.
Some companies and the NBB argued that a countervailing duty should not be levied on imports of B100, since such sales to the EU cannot benefit from the biodiesel tax credit.
Nekatere družbe in nacionalni odbor za biodizel so trdili, da se izravnalna dajatev ne bi smela uporabljati za uvoz B100, saj za prodajo B100 EU niso na voljo davčne olajšave za biodizel.