natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to them, disregarding the effect of the subsidy granted both on domestic and export sales resulted in the understatement of revenues, affecting both the normal value for the like product and the export price determination for the product concerned.
Glede na njihove trditve je neupoštevanje učinka subvencije, dodeljene za domačo prodajo in izvoz, vodilo k navedbi prenizkih prihodkov, kar je vplivalo na normalno vrednost podobnega izdelka in določitev izvozne cene zadevnega izdelka.
Consequently, the normal value was affected since the ordinary course of trade test was determined based on sales prices that did not take into account the revenue generated by sales of the product benefiting from the subsidy whilst the export price was equally understated for the same reason.
To je vplivalo na normalno vrednost, saj se je običajni potek trgovine ugotavljal na podlagi prodajnih cen, pri katerih se ni upošteval prihodek od prodaje izdelka, ki je bil subvencioniran, medtem ko se je iz enakih razlogov prenizko določila tudi izvozna cena.
These parties further alleged that the non-adjustment of the subsidy constituted a manifest error in the application of Articles 2(4) and 2(10) of the basic Regulation because it contributed to the use of constructed normal values whilst the production and sales of the product concerned were in reality profitable if account was taken of the subsidies.
Poleg tega so te stranke navedle, da je neprilagoditev subvencije pomenila očitno napako pri izvajanju člena 2(4) in 2(10) osnovne uredbe, saj je prispevala k uporabi konstruiranih normalnih vrednosti, medtem ko sta bili ob upoštevanju subvencij proizvodnja in prodaja zadevnega izdelka dejansko donosni.
It is recalled that according to the findings of the investigation, the US authorities granted a so-called blender's credit of 1 USD per gallon of pure biodiesel present in the blend of biodiesel with mineral diesel.
Spomniti je treba, da so ameriški organi v skladu z ugotovitvami iz preiskave dodelili tako imenovano davčno olajšavo za pripravljavce mešanice v višini 1 USD na galono čistega biodizla v mešanici biodizla in mineralnega dizla.
Accordingly NBB claimed that in order to ensure a fair comparison and functional symmetry between normal value and export price under Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, the blender's credit should be added not only to the normal value but also to the export price.
Nacionalni odbor za biodizel je v skladu s tem trdil, da je za zagotovitev pravične primerjave in funkcionalne simetrije med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno na podlagi člena 2(10) osnovne uredbe treba normalni vrednosti in tudi izvozni ceni prišteti davčno olajšavo za pripravljavce mešanice.
As explained in recital (38) of the provisional Regulation, the circumstances in which a subsidy could lead to an adjustment as claimed by NBB to avoid a double remedy in the case of parallel anti-subsidy and anti-dumping investigations for the same product are expressly provided in Article 24(1) of the anti-subsidy basic Regulation which states that no product shall be subject to both anti-dumping and countervailing duties for the purpose of dealing with one and the same situation arising from dumping or from export subsidisation.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (38) začasne uredbe, so okoliščine, v katerih bi subvencija lahko vodila k prilagoditvi, ki jo zahteva NBB, za preprečevanje dvojne pomoči v primeru vzporednih protisubvencijskih in protidampinških preiskav istega izdelka, izrecno določene v členu 24(1) protisubvencijske osnovne uredbe, v katerem je navedeno, da za noben izdelek ne smejo hkrati veljati protidampinške in izravnalne dajatve za obravnavanje enih in istih razmer, ki izhajajo iz dampinga ali subvencioniranja izvoza.
Such circumstances do not arise in the current case.
Takih okoliščin v tem primeru ni.
Indeed, the blender's credit is a subsidy available for both domestic and export sales exactly in the same way and for the same amount and does not therefore constitute export subsidisation within the meaning of Article 24(1).
Davčna olajšava za pripravljavce mešanice je dejansko subvencija, ki je na voljo za domačo prodajo in izvoz na enak način in v enakem znesku, zato ni izvozna subvencija v smislu člena 24(1).
This was not challenged by NBB.
Temu NBB ni nasprotoval.
Therefore, the claim that the blender's credit should be ‘adjusted’ in the dumping calculations was considered unwarranted and was therefore rejected.
Zato se je trditev, da je treba davčno olajšavo za pripravljavce mešanice „prilagoditi“ v izračunih dampinga, štela za neutemeljeno in je bila zato zavrnjena.
In the absence of any other comments which would alter the provisional findings in this respect, recitals (36) to (38) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb, ki bi spremenile začasne ugotovitve v zvezi s tem, se uvodne izjave od (36) do (38) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Following the disclosure of the provisional findings, one exporting producer pointed to a clerical error in the calculation of the normal value of a certain product type based on the domestic sales price.
Eden od proizvajalcev izvoznikov je po razkritju začasnih ugotovitev opozoril na pisno napako pri izračunu normalne vrednosti določene vrste izdelka na podlagi domače prodajne cene.
This clerical error was corrected.
Ta napaka je bila popravljena.
Another exporting producer, which had no representative domestic sales, disputed the use of the weighted average profit margin of other exporting producers subject to the investigation in respect of their production and sales of the like product on the domestic market, when constructing the normal value.
Drug proizvajalec izvoznik, ki ni imel reprezentativne domače prodaje, je nasprotoval uporabi tehtane povprečne stopnje dobička drugih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, vključenih v preiskavo v zvezi s svojo proizvodnjo in prodajo podobnega izdelka na notranjem trgu, pri določanju normalne vrednosti.
It claimed that instead of using the average profit margin of the two integrated producers which were profitable on their domestic sales in the IP, the average profit used should have been that of the non-integrated producers.
Trdil je, da je treba namesto povprečne stopnje dobička dveh integriranih proizvajalcev, ki sta v OP dosegala dobičke pri domači prodaji, uporabiti povprečni dobiček neintegriranih proizvajalcev.
Given that the company acquired its feedstock in the open market, it claimed that it could not be compared with the two fully integrated producers, which it claimed were not representative of the market conditions of all other sampled exporting producers.
Ker je surovine kupoval na odprtem trgu, je trdil, da se ne more primerjati z dvema popolnoma integriranima proizvajalcema, ki naj ne bi ustrezno predstavljala tržnih razmer za druge vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike.
The above claim was considered warranted, since indeed it can be argued that the situation of the two integrated producers may not be directly comparable to that of the other sampled producers in that they are fully integrated and have access to their own feedstock.
Zgornja trditev se je štela za utemeljeno, ker je dejansko mogoče ugotoviti, da položaj obeh integriranih proizvajalcev morda ni neposredno primerljiv s položaji drugih vzorčenih proizvajalcev, ker sta popolnoma integrirana in imata dostop do lastnih surovin.
However, the suggestion to use the average profit margins of the non-integrated producers was not possible since none of these producers were profitable on their domestic sales in the IP.
Vendar predlog, naj se uporabijo povprečne stopnje dobička neintegriranih proizvajalcev, ni bil izvedljiv, saj nobeden od njih v OP ni ustvaril dobička pri domači prodaji.
It was therefore considered reasonable, in accordance with Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation, to base the profit on the profitable domestic sales transactions of all sampled exporting producers with domestic sales instead.
Zato se je v skladu s členom 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe štelo za razumno, da dobiček namesto tega temelji na donosnih domačih prodajnih transakcijah vseh vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki prodajajo na notranjem trgu.
This profit was then used for constructing the normal value of the said exporting producer.
Ta dobiček se je nato uporabil za določitev normalne vrednosti za navedenega proizvajalca izvoznika.
Following final disclosure, one exporting producer group claimed that the profit margin used for constructing the normal value of the product types which were not sold on the domestic market in the IP was not reasonable.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ena skupina proizvajalka izvoznica trdila, da stopnja dobička, ki se je uporabila za določitev normalne vrednosti vrst izdelka, ki se niso prodajale na notranjem trgu v OP, ni bila razumna.
It argued that the normal value should have been established based on the product types for which the normal value was not constructed, applying an adjustment for physical differences, in accordance with Article 2(10)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Trdila je, da bi morala biti normalna vrednost določena na podlagi vrst izdelkov, za katere normalna vrednost ni bila določena, ob uporabi prilagoditev za fizikalne razlike v skladu s členom 2(10)(a) osnovne uredbe.
It further claimed that the adjustments made in the context of calculating the injury margins should have been applied also for the calculation of the normal value.
Trdila je še, da bi se morale prilagoditve, narejene pri izračunu stopenj škode, uporabiti tudi pri izračunu normalne vrednosti.
In this respect it is noted that the purpose of the adjustments mentioned in Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation is to allow a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price and not to establish normal value.
V zvezi s tem se opozarja, da je namen prilagoditev iz člena 2(10) osnovne uredbe omogočiti pošteno primerjavo med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno, ne pa določitev normalne vrednosti.
The purpose of the adjustment made in the injury calculations was to make the imports of US biodiesel comparable with the biodiesel produced and sold by the Community industry on the Community market.
Prilagoditve pri izračunu škode so bile narejene zato, da bi bilo možno uvoz ameriškega biodizla primerjati z biodizlom, ki ga proizvaja in prodaja industrija Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti.
As described in recital 46 of the provisional Regulation, the profit used for the constructed normal value is determined in accordance with Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation.
Kakor je opisano v uvodni izjavi 46 začasne uredbe, se dobiček, ki se uporabi za konstruirano normalno vrednost, določi v skladu s členom 2(6) osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, this claim was not considered warranted and had to be rejected.
Zato ta trditev ni bila upoštevana in jo je bilo treba zavreči.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the normal value, which would alter the provisional findings, recitals (39) to (48) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb k normalni vrednosti, ki bi spremenile začasne ugotovitve, se uvodne izjave od (39) do (48) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One exporting producer contested the determination of the profit margin for its related importer in the Community, claiming that certain costs, such as ocean freight and insurance costs were not included in the cost of goods sold.
Eden od proizvajalcev izvoznikov je nasprotoval določitvi stopnje dobička za svojega povezanega uvoznika v Skupnosti, pri čemer je trdil, da nekateri stroški, kot so stroški čezmorskega prevoza in zavarovanja, niso bili vključeni v ceno prodajanega blaga.
This claim was found to be warranted and the cost of goods sold of the related importer was revised based on the FOB purchase price to which all costs in obtaining the product concerned were added, such as commissions, transport, insurance and handling costs, and customs duties paid.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je ta trditev utemeljena, zato se je cena blaga, ki ga prodaja povezani izvoznik, pregledala na podlagi nakupne cene FOB, ki so se ji prišteli vsi stroški za pridobivanje zadevnega izdelka, kot so provizije, prevozni, zavarovalni in manipulativni stroški ter plačane carinske dajatve.
The same exporting producer claimed that the results of certain settled hedging operations at the level of the same related importer were unjustly apportioned to the operational result of the product concerned, whereas they were strictly related to operations on the acquisition and sale of another product.
Isti proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da so bili rezultati nekaterih ustaljenih dejavnosti za varovanje pred tveganjem na ravni istega povezanega uvoznika nepravično pripisani poslovnemu rezultatu zadevnega izdelka, pri čemer so bili strogo povezani z dejavnostmi nabave in prodaje drugega izdelka.
The company provided evidence showing that the results of the settled hedging operations referred exclusively to individual sales contracts regarding a product that was not the product concerned and consequently did not influence the SG&A expenses related to the product concerned.
Družba je predložila dokaze, da so bili rezultati ustaljenih dejavnosti za varovanje pred tveganjem povezani izključno s posameznimi prodajnimi pogodbami za izdelek, ki ni bil zadevni izdelek, zato niso vplivali na prodajne, splošne in upravne stroške, povezane z zadevnim izdelkom.
In view of the above, since these operations were found not to relate to the product concerned it was decided not to incorporate these results in the determination of the SG&A expenses of the related importer.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega in ugotovitve, da te dejavnosti niso bile povezane z zadevnim izdelkom, je bilo odločeno, da se ti rezultati ne bodo upoštevali pri določanju prodajnih, splošnih in upravnih stroškov povezanega uvoznika.
Following final disclosure, one exporting producer group disputed the exclusion from the calculations of the part of its biodiesel exports to the Community that had been further blended with other non-US biodiesel and resold in the Community as a blend of both origins.
Po dokončnem razkritju se ena skupina proizvajalka izvoznica ni strinjala, da je bil iz izračuna izključen del biodizla, izvoženega v Skupnost, ki je bil nato nadalje mešan z drugimi vrstami neameriškega biodizla in se naprej prodajal v Skupnosti kot mešanica z obema porekloma.
In the light of the comments received and the alternative method proposed by the exporting producer group in question to establish a reliable export price from the blends resold in the Community, the Commission re-assessed the determination of the export price.
Glede na prejete pripombe in alternativno metodo, ki jo je predlagala zadevna skupina proizvajalka izvoznica za določitev zanesljive izvozne cene na podlagi mešanic, ki so se nadalje prodajale v Skupnosti, je Komisija ponovno preverila določitev izvozne cene.
The method put forward by the group could not be followed as it failed to individually identify the relevant export price for the imported biodiesel components of the blend that was subsequently resold on the Community market.
Metode, ki jo je predlagala skupina, ni bilo možno uporabiti, saj ni omogočala posamične opredelitve zadevne izvozne cene uvoženih biodizelskih sestavin, ki so sestavni del mešanice, ki se je nato nadalje prodajala na trgu Skupnosti.
However, in line with the methodology applied in the injury calculations, the resale price of the blend sold on the Community market was brought to rapeseed feedstockequivalent and the ex-works export price was constructed on that basis, by deducting all costs incurred between importation and resale, in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Vendar je bila v skladu z metodologijo, uporabljeno pri izračunih škode, cena nadaljnje prodaje mešanice, ki se je prodajala na trgu Skupnosti, izražena v ekvivalentih surovine repičnega semena in bila podlaga za konstruiranje izvozne cene franko tovarna, pri čemer so se v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe odšteli vsi stroški, nastali med uvozom in ponovno prodajo.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the export price, which would alter the provisional findings, recitals (49) to (50) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb k izvozni ceni, ki bi spremenile začasne ugotovitve, se uvodni izjavi (49) in (50) začasne uredbe potrdita.
Two exporting producers contested the adjustments in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation in respect of freight, handling and warehousing costs that occurred between the location of the production facilities and the terminal from which the product concerned was shipped for sale.
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika sta nasprotovala prilagoditvam v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe v zvezi s prevoznimi in manipulativnimi stroški ter stroški skladiščenja, ki so nastali med sedežem proizvodnega obrata in terminalom, s katerega je bil zadevni izdelek odpremljen za prodajo.
Furthermore, one of the exporting producers claimed that in the terminal the product loses its individual identity since it is blended with other material and that as a consequence the abovementioned expenses should not be considered to be directly related to the sale.
Poleg tega je eden od proizvajalcev izvoznikov trdil, da izdelek na terminalu izgubi svoje individualne lastnosti, ker se meša z drugimi materiali, zato se zgoraj navedeni stroški ne smejo šteti za neposredno povezane s prodajo.
It should be stressed that for the calculation of the dumping margins only biodiesel produced by the exporting producers investigated was taken into account, whether in a pure form or blended.
Poudariti je treba, da se je pri izračunu stopenj dampinga upošteval le biodizel, ki so ga proizvedli preiskovani proizvajalci izvozniki, ne glede na to, ali je bil v čisti obliki ali mešanici.
Therefore disregarding certain costs that occurred after the production of the B100 base product is not considered warranted.
Zato se neupoštevanje nekaterih stroškov, ki so nastali po proizvodnji osnovnega izdelka B100, ne šteje za utemeljeno.
Consequently these costs should be deducted to bring the export price to unrelated parties of all own-produced biodiesel, whether in pure form or blended, back to the ex-works level.
Te stroške je zato treba odšteti, da se izvozna cena vsega biodizla iz samoproizvodnje za nepovezane stranke, ne glede na to, ali je biodizel v čisti obliki ali mešanici, spet vrne na raven cene franko tovarna.
The fact that the transport of biodiesel takes place from the factory to a terminal outside the factory does not mean that the own-produced part of the final blend would not have been subject to transport, handling and warehousing costs.
Dejstvo, da se biodizel transportira od tovarne do terminala zunaj tovarne, ne pomeni, da pri delu končne mešanice, ki ga stranke proizvedejo same, ne bi nastali prevozni in manipulativni stroški ter stroški skladiščenja.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the comparison, which would alter the provisional findings, recitals (51) to (53) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb k primerjavi, ki bi spremenile začasne ugotovitve, se uvodne izjave od (51) do (53) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The definitive dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Community frontier price, duty unpaid, are the following:
Dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, so:
Co-operating non-sampled
sodelujoče nevzorčene družbe
In view of the changes in the dumping margins of the sampled companies, the weighted average dumping margin of the cooperating exporting producers not included in the sample was recalculated in accordance with the methodology described in recital (56) of the provisional Regulation.
Tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki niso bili vključeni v vzorec, se je ob upoštevanju spremenjenih stopenj dampinga vzorčenih družb znova izračunala v skladu z metodologijo, opisano v uvodni izjavi (56) začasne uredbe.
As indicated above, it was set at 33,5 % of the CIF Community frontier price, duty unpaid.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, je bila ta stopnja določena na 33,5 % cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve.
The basis for establishing the country-wide dumping margin was set out in recital (57) of the provisional Regulation.
Podlaga za določitev stopnje dampinga na ravni države je bila določena v uvodni izjavi (57) začasne uredbe.
On the same basis, the county-wide dumping margin was definitely set at 39,2 %.
Na isti podlagi je bila stopnja dampinga na ravni države dokončno določena na 39,2 %.
One interested party contested the exclusion from the assessment of total Community production of the group of producers related to an exporting producer in the USA mentioned in recital (60) of the provisional Regulation on the basis of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation.
Ena od zainteresiranih strank je nasprotovala izključitvi skupine proizvajalcev, povezanih s proizvajalcem izvoznikom v ZDA, kot je navedena v uvodni izjavi (60) začasne uredbe, iz ocene celotne proizvodnje Skupnosti na podlagi člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe.
The relevant provisions of the basic Regulation to assess standing or the support for the investigation are Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation.
Ustrezne določbe osnovne uredbe za oceno položaja ali podpore za preiskavo so navedene v členu 4(1) in členu 5(4) osnovne uredbe.
For information, the relevant provisions of the Anti-Dumping Agreement (ADA) concerning the definition of the domestic industry are contained in Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation.
Zgolj v vednost, ustrezne določbe protidampinškega sporazuma v zvezi z opredelitvijo domače industrije so vključene v člen 4(1) osnovne uredbe.
In this regard it is noted that the total Community production figure indicated in recital (60) of the provisional Regulation does indeed take into account the production volume of biodiesel in blends above B20.
V zvezi s tem se ugotavlja, da je pri vrednosti celotne proizvodnje Skupnosti, navedeni v uvodni izjavi (60) začasne uredbe, dejansko upoštevan obseg proizvodnje biodizla v mešanicah nad B20.
It can further be clarified that according to available information, the production in the Community of blends containing between 21 % (B21) and 99 % (B99) of biodiesel has been very limited during the IP.
Poleg tega je mogoče pojasniti, da je bila glede na razpoložljive informacije proizvodnja mešanic, ki vsebujejo od 21 % (B21) do 99 % (B99) biodizla, v Skupnosti v OP zelo majhna.
The only production of blends in this range was concentrated on blends of B30 and did not exceed 60000 tonnes in terms of biodiesel content.
Edina proizvodnja mešanic v tem razponu je bila osredotočena na mešanice B30 in ni presegla 60000 ton v smislu vsebnosti biodizla.
Moreover, the Commission has contacted known producers of B30 after the imposition of provisional measures and the responses received from two of the producers indicate that they support the complaint.
Poleg tega je Komisija po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov stopila v stik z znanimi proizvajalci B30, prejeta odgovora dveh zadevnih proizvajalcev pa kažeta, da podpirajo pritožbo.
In the absence of any other comments recitals (59) to (61) of the provisional Regulation concerning the definition of Community production, Community industry and standing are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave od (59) do (61) začasne uredbe v zvezi z opredelitvijo proizvodnje, industrije in položaja Skupnosti potrdijo.
It was claimed that this producer was not injured during the IP and that best facts available should be used in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Trdila je, da ta proizvajalec v OP ni bil oškodovan in da je treba v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe uporabiti najboljša dostopna dejstva.
In this regard, the party suggested, using the publicly available financial data of this producer for 2007 and 2008, for the examination of injury to the Community industry.
V zvezi s tem je stranka predlagala, naj se uporabijo javno dostopni finančni podatki o tem proizvajalcu za leti 2007 in 2008, da se prouči škoda za industrijo Skupnosti.