natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission, by several notices [9] that were published in the Official Journal of the European Union, has invited interested parties to request the initiation of interim reviews if they submit evidence that the measures would have been significantly different if they were based on information including the new Member States.
Komisija je s posameznimi obvestili [9], objavljenimi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, povabila zainteresirane stranke, da zahtevajo začetek vmesnih pregledov, če predložijo dokaze, da bi bili ukrepi bistveno drugačni, če bi temeljili na podatkih, ki vključujejo nove države članice.
No such requests and substantiated evidence have been submitted to the Commission.
Komisiji niso bile predložene nobeni taki zahtevki in utemeljeni dokazi.
In this regard, it should be noted that enlargement per se, in the absence of such evidence, is not a sufficient basis for a review to be initiated.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da širitev sama po sebi ni zadostna podlaga za začetek pregleda, če takšnih dokazov ni.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of the expiry review, the Commission initiated this review on 14 April 2007 [10].
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek vmesnega pregleda, je Komisija 30. novembra 2005 začela s pregledom 14. aprila 2005 [10].
Parties concerned by the investigations
Stranke, ki jih preiskava zadeva
The interim review investigation is limited in scope to the examination of dumping as far as EuroChem is concerned.
Preiskava v zvezi z vmesnim pregledom je omejena na preučitev vprašanja dampinga, kar zadeva Eurochem.
The Commission officially advised the exporting producer, the representatives of the exporting country and the Community producers of the initiation of the partial interim review.
Komisija je o začetku delnega vmesnega pregleda uradno obvestila proizvajalca izvoznika, predstavnike države izvoznice in proizvajalce Skupnosti.
With regard to the expiry review investigation, the Commission officially advised the exporting producers, the representatives of the exporting country, importers, Community producers, users and the applicant (EFMA) of the initiation of the expiry review.
Glede preiskave v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa je Komisija o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa uradno obvestila proizvajalce izvoznike, predstavnike države izvoznice, uvoznike, proizvajalce Skupnosti, uporabnike in vložnika (EFMA).
Sampling of Community producers
Vzorčenje za proizvajalce Skupnosti
In view of the large number of Community producers (23) and of importers in the Community, it was considered appropriate in the expiry review, in conformity with Article 17 of the basic Regulation, to examine whether sampling should be used.
Glede na veliko število proizvajalcev Skupnosti (23) in uvoznikov v Skupnost se je štelo za primerno, da se v pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe preveri, ali naj se uporabi vzorčenje.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would indeed be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Community producers and importers were requested, pursuant to Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation to make themselves known within 15 days of the initiation of the investigation and to provide the Commission with the information requested in the notice of initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, so bili proizvajalci Skupnosti ter uvozniki v skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe naprošeni, naj se javijo v roku 15 dni od začetka preiskave in Komisiji predložijo informacije, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku.
After examination of the information submitted, and given that 14 Community producers indicated their willingness to cooperate, it was decided that sampling was necessary with regard to Community producers.
Po preučitvi predloženih informacij in ob upoštevanju, da je 14 proizvajalcev Skupnosti izrazilo svojo pripravljenost za sodelovanje, je bilo odločeno, da je potrebno vzorčenje v zvezi s proizvajalci Skupnosti.
Sampling of Community importers
Vzorčenje za uvoznike Skupnosti
Only one importer responded to the notice of initiation and initially expressed its willingness to cooperate.
Na obvestilo o začetku se je odzval samo en uvoznik, ki je najprej izrazil svojo pripravljenost za sodelovanje.
However, this importer eventually did not provide any of the requested information as it stopped importing ammonium nitrate from Russia in 2005.
Vendar ta uvoznik na koncu ni zagotovil nobene izmed zahtevanih informacij, saj je leta 2005 prenehal uvažati amonijev nitrat iz Rusije.
Questionnaires and verification
Vprašalniki in preverjanje
For the interim review a questionnaire was sent to EuroChem, which cooperated by replying to the questionnaire.
Vprašalnik za vmesni pregled je bil poslan Eurochemu, ki je sodeloval tako, da ga je izpolnil.
For the expiry review questionnaires were sent to all known exporting producers in the countries concerned, related importers, the Community producers in the sample, users and the applicant.
Za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa so bili vprašalniki poslani vsem znanim proizvajalcem izvoznikom v zadevnih državah, povezanim uvoznikom, proizvajalcem Skupnosti v vzorcu, uporabnikom in vložniku.
As for the expiry review replies to the questionnaire were received from:
Izpolnjene vprašalnike za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa so predložili
Three Russian exporting producers/distributors.
Trije ruski proizvajalci izvozniki/distributerji.
These companies were: EuroChem, Acron (‘Acron’), and JSC Minudiobreniya (‘Minudiobreniya’).
Te družbe so bile: Eurochem, Acron („Acron“) in JSC Minudiobreniya („Minudiobreniya“).
Four sampled Community producers:
Štirje vzorčeni proizvajalci Skupnosti:
Grande Paroisse Société Anonyme (Paris, France),
Grande Paroisse Société Anonyme (Pariz, Francija),
Terra Nitrogen Limited (Stockton-on-Tees, UK),
Terra Nitrogen Limited (Stockton-on-Tees, Združeno kraljestvo),
Yara (Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands and the UK),
Yara (Belgija, Nemčija, Francija, Italija, Nizozemska in Združeno kraljestvo),
Zakłady Azotowe Puławy (Poland).
Zakłady Azotowe Puławy (Poljska).
From the 55 addressed potential importers of ammonium nitrate into the Community, only three companies replied indicating they had no imports of the product concerned during the period considered.
Od 55 naslovljenih potencialnih uvoznikov amonijevega nitrata v Skupnost so odgovorile 3 družbe, ki so navedle, da med obravnavanim obdobjem niso uvažale zadevnega izdelka.
Written comments were received from the Committee of Professional Agricultural Organisations in the EU (COPA)/General Confederation of Agricultural Cooperatives in the EU (Cogeca), from the National Farmers’ Union of England and Wales and from the Federation of Swedish farmers.
Pisne pripombe so poslali Odbor profesionalnih kmetijskih organizacij v EU (COPA)/Splošna konfederacija kmetijskih zadrug v EU (COGECA), Nacionalna kmečka zveza Anglije in Walesa ter Zveza švedskih kmetov.
In both investigations interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the respective notices of initiation.
Zainteresiranim strankam je bila v obeh preiskavah dana možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča ter zahtevajo zaslišanje v roku, določenem v zadevnih obvestilih o začetku.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for its analysis and carried out verification visits at the premises of the following companies:
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse podatke, za katere je menila, da so potrebni za analizo, ter opravila preveritvene obiske v prostorih naslednjih družb:
EuroChem and its two related companies [11]:
Eurochem in njegovi dve povezani družbi [11]:
OJSC Azot (‘NAK Azot’), Novomoskovsk, Russia, and
OJSC Azot („NAK Azot“), Novomoskovsk, Rusija in
OJSC Nevinnomyssky Azot (‘Nevinka Azot’), Nevinnomyssk, Russia.
OJSC Nevinnomyssky Azot („Nevinka Azot“), Nevinnomyssk, Rusija.
Acron and its three related companies:
Acron in njegove tri povezane družbe:
Yara Société Anonyme (offices visited in Brussels, Belgium; in Paris, France and in Sluiskil, the Netherlands),
Yara Société Anonyme (poslovalnice, obiskane v Bruslju, Belgija; v Parizu, Francija in v Sluiskilu, Nizozemska),
EuroChem GmbH — Zug (Switzerland)
Eurochem GmbH – Zug (Švica)
No verification visits were carried out, because no importer of AN from the country concerned replied to the questionnaire.
Noben preveritveni obisk ni bil opravljen, saj na vprašalnik ni odgovoril noben uvoznik AN iz zadevne države.
The investigation period for the partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation concerning imports from EuroChem covered the period from 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005 (‘interim review investigation period’‘IRIP’).
Obdobje preiskave za delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe, ki se nanaša na uvoz iz Eurochema, je zajemalo obdobje od 1. julija 2004 do 30. junija 2005 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi z vmesnim pregledom“ ali „IRIP“).
The investigation period for the expiry review covered the period from 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2007 (‘expiry review investigation period’ or ‘ERIP’).
Obdobje preiskave za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa je zajemalo obdobje od 1. aprila 2006 do 31. marca 2007 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa“ ali „OPP“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2003 up to the end of the ERIP (‘period considered’).
Proučevanje trendov, ki so pomembni za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovnega pojava škode, je zajemalo obdobje od 1. januarja 2003 do konca OPP („obravnavano obdobje“).
All interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the amendment of the anti-dumping measures imposed on the company EuroChem and to maintain a definitive anti-dumping duty on AN originating in Russia.
Vse zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti sprememba protidampinških ukrepov, ki so bili uvedeni za družbo Eurochem, ter ohraniti dokončna protidampinška dajatev na AN s poreklom iz Rusije.
They were also granted a period within which they could make representations subsequent to the disclosures.
Po teh obvestilih jim je bil dan tudi rok za predložitev stališč.
The product concerned by these reviews is the same as the product defined in Regulation (EC) No 945/2005, i.e. solid fertilisers with an ammonium nitrate content exceeding 80 % by weight, falling within CN codes 31023090, 31024090, ex31022900, ex31026000, ex31029000, ex31051000, ex31052010, ex31055100, ex31055900 and ex31059091 and originating in Russia.
Zadevni izdelek v teh pregledih je enak kot izdelek, določen v Uredbi (ES) št. 945/2005, to so trdna gnojila z vsebnostjo amonijevega nitrata, ki presega 80 mas. %, in ki spadajo pod oznake KN 31023090, 31024090, ex31022900, ex31026000, ex31029000, ex31051000, ex31052010, ex31055100, ex31055900 in ex31059091 in s poreklom iz Rusije.
As in previous investigations, it was found that AN produced and sold on the domestic market in Russia and AN exported to the Community from Russia have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and uses.
Kot v predhodnih preiskavah je bilo ugotovljeno, da ima AN, proizveden in prodan na domačem trgu v Rusiji, enake osnovne fizične in tehnične lastnosti in enako uporabnost kot AN, izvožen iz Rusije v Skupnost.
Therefore, they are like products for the purposes of the present investigations within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato sta ta dva izdelka za namene sedanjih preiskav podobna izdelka v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
The ammonium nitrate produced by the Community industry is a like-product as regards physical and technical characteristics to the ammonium nitrate exported to the Community by Russia.
Amonijev nitrat, ki ga proizvede industrija Skupnosti, je podoben izdelek amonijevemu nitratu, izvoženemu v Skupnost iz Rusije, kar zadeva fizične in tehnične lastnosti.
PARTIAL INTERIM REVIEW: DUMPING
DELNI VMESNI PREGLED: DAMPING
Since all products sold by EuroChem to the Community during the IRIP were exclusively produced by one related producer, NAK Azot, the analysis, as regards normal value and export price, has been carried out in respect of this producer only.
Ker je vse izdelke, ki jih je Eurochem prodal Skupnosti med IRIP, proizvedel izključno en povezan proizvajalec, NAK Azot, je bila analiza v zvezi z normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno izvedena samo v zvezi s tem proizvajalcem.
The resulting dumping margin and duty, if any, to be applied to imports manufactured by NAK Azot should also be applied to the related company, Nevinka Azot.
Ugotovljena stopnja dampinga in morebitna dajatev, uporabljena za uvoz, ki ga proizvaja NAK Azot, se uporablja tudi za povezano družbo, Nevinka Azot.
Only one product type was exported to the Community, therefore normal value was established in relation to this product type.
Samo en tip izdelka je bil izvožen v Skupnost, zato je bila normalna vrednost določena v zvezi s tem tipom izdelka.
It was examined whether sufficient sales had been made in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Preučilo se je, ali je bila v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe med običajnim potekom trgovine prodana zadostna količina.
The domestic selling prices of each transaction were compared to the total cost of production.
Domače prodajne cene vsake transakcije so se primerjale s celotnimi proizvodnimi stroški.
In this respect, it should be noted that energy costs, such as electricity and gas, represent a major proportion of the manufacturing cost and a significant proportion of the total cost of production.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da stroški energije, kot sta elektrika in plin, predstavljajo večji delež proizvodnih stroškov in znatni delež celotnih proizvodnih stroškov.
For the purpose of carrying out the ordinary course of trade test, it had also been examined whether the costs associated with the production and sale of the product under consideration were reasonably reflected in the records of the parties concerned.
Za namene preverjanja vprašanja, ali so bili posli opravljeni v običajnem poteku trgovine, je bilo tudi preverjeno, ali so stroški, ki so povezani s proizvodnjo in prodajo obravnavanega izdelka, v evidencah zadevnih strank ustrezno izraženi.
The investigation showed no indication that the electricity would not be reasonably reflected in the records.
Preiskava ni pokazala nobenih znakov, da elektrika ne bi bila ustrezno izražena v evidencah.
In this context, it is, inter alia, noted that electricity prices paid by EuroChem during the IRIP were in line with international market prices, when compared to other countries, such as Canada and Norway.
V tem smislu je, inter alia, ugotovljeno, da so bile cene električne energije, ki jih je Eurochem plačeval med IRIP, v skladu z mednarodnimi tržnimi cenami v primerjavi z drugimi državami, kot sta Kanada in Norveška.
As concerns gas supplies, in fact, it was established on the basis of data published by internationally recognised sources specialised in energy markets, that the price paid by EuroChem was around one-fifth of the export price of natural gas from Russia.
V zvezi z oskrbo plina je bilo na podlagi podatkov, ki so jih objavili mednarodno priznani viri, specializirani za energetske trge, dejansko ugotovljeno, da je cena, ki jo je plačeval Eurochem, znašala približno eno petino izvozne cene zemeljskega plina iz Rusije.
Moreover, all available data indicates that domestic gas prices in Russia were regulated prices, which are far below market prices paid for natural gas, for example in the USA, Canada, Japan and the EU.
Poleg tega vsi razpoložljivi podatki kažejo, da so bile domače cene plina v Rusiji nadzorovane cene, ki so bistveno nižje od tržnih cen, ki se plačujejo za zemeljski plin na primer v ZDA, Kanadi, na Japonskem in v EU.
These four markets account for a total of 46 % of worldwide gas consumption, and the prevailing domestic price levels in these four markets appear to reasonably reflect costs.
Ti štirje trgi zavzemajo skupaj 46 % svetovne porabe plina in veljavne ravni domačih cen na teh štirih trgih ustrezno odražajo stroške.
These gas markets can therefore considered representative within the meaning of Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se ti trgi s plinom štejejo kot reprezentativni v smislu člena 2(5) osnovne uredbe.
Information available also suggests that domestic sales prices of Russian gas do not even cover costs of the gas supplier, Gazprom.
Razpoložljive informacije tudi kažejo, da domače prodajne cene ruskega plina ne pokrivajo niti stroškov dobavitelja plina, Gazprom.
In view of the above, it was considered that the gas prices paid by NAK Azot during the investigation period could not be used for the purposes of determining the cost of production of the product concerned pursuant to the first sentence of Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu z zgoraj navedenim se sklene, da se cene plina, ki jih je med obdobjem preiskave plačevala družba NAK Azot, ne morejo uporabiti za določanje proizvodnih stroškov zadevnega izdelka v skladu s prvim stavkom člena 2(5) osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, as provided for in Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation, the costs, i.e. in this case, for gas supplies, of NAK Azot had to be adjusted to reflect the costs associated with the production and sale of the like product, during the IRIP.
Zato je bilo treba stroške družbe NAK Azot, tj. v tem primeru za oskrbo s plinom, kot je predvideno v členu 2(5) osnovne uredbe, prilagoditi, da so odražali stroške, povezane s proizvodnjo in prodajo podobnega izdelka med IRIP.
Given that the current review was limited to an examination of the level of dumping by EuroChem, an adjustment on the basis of undistorted prices paid by other producers or exporters in Russia could not be made as no such data was available.
Glede na to, da je bil sedanji pregled omejen na preiskavo stopnje dampinga Eurochema, ni bilo mogoče izvesti prilagoditve na podlagi neizkrivljenih cen, ki jih plačujejo drugi proizvajalci ali izvozniki v Rusiji, saj takšni podatki niso bili na voljo.
In these circumstances, it was considered appropriate to base the adjustment, in accordance with Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation, on information from other representative markets.
V teh okoliščinah se je štelo za primerno, da se prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe utemelji na informacijah iz drugih reprezentativnih trgov.
In this case, the adjusted price was based on the average price of Russian gas when sold for export at the German/Czech border, net of transport costs (‘the adjusted Waidhaus price’).
V tem primeru je prilagojena cena temeljila na povprečni ceni ruskega plina, ki se proda za izvoz na nemško/češki meji, brez prevoznih stroškov („prilagojena Waidhaus cena“).
The production cost provided by NAK Azot was therefore recalculated in order to take account of the adjusted gas prices.
Proizvodni stroški, ki jih je zagotovila družba NAK Azot, so bili zato ponovno izračunani, da bi se upoštevale prilagojene cene plina.
On the basis of this recalculated cost of production, all sales of the domestic product which were directly comparable with the sole product type exported by the company were found to be non-profitable, i.e. not made in the ordinary course of trade.
Na podlagi teh ponovno izračunanih proizvodnih stroškov je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila celotna prodaja domačega izdelka, ki je neposredno primerljiva z edinim tipom izdelka, ki ga je izvažala družba, nedonosna, torej ni bila opravljena v običajnem poteku trgovine.
Therefore, normal value had to be constructed.
Zato je bilo treba normalno vrednost konstruirati.
This was done on the basis of the manufacturing costs of the product type exported to the Community, after the adjustment for the gas cost mentioned above, plus a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative costs (‘SG&A costs’) and for profits, in accordance with Article 2(3) and Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation.
To je bilo narejeno na podlagi proizvodnih stroškov tipa izdelka, izvoženega v Skupnost, po prilagoditvi za zgoraj omenjene stroške plina v skladu s členom 2(3) in 2(6) osnovne uredbe, s prištetim primernim zneskom za prodajne, splošne in upravne stroke („PS&U stroški“) ter za dobiček.
SG&A costs and profit could not be established on the basis of the chapeau of Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation because NAK Azot did not have representative domestic sales of the product concerned in the ordinary course of trade.
PS&U stroškov in dobička ni bilo mogoče določiti na podlagi uvodnega stavka člena 2(6) osnovne uredbe, ker NAK Azot ni imel reprezentativne domače prodaje zadevnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovine.
Article 2(6)(a) of the basic Regulation could not be applied, since there is only one other producer subject to the investigation (Nevinka Azot).
Člena 2(6)(a) osnovne uredbe ni bilo mogoče uporabiti, saj je v preiskavo zajet samo še eden proizvajalec (Nevinka Azot).
Article 2(6)(b) was not applicable either, since the manufacturing cost of NAK Azot for products belonging to the same general category of goods would also need to be adjusted in respect of gas costs, for the reasons indicated above.
Člen 2(6)(b) prav tako ni bil uporaben, saj bi bilo treba zaradi zgoraj navedenih razlogov v zvezi s stroški plina prilagoditi tudi proizvodne stroške NAK Azot za izdelke, ki spadajo v isto splošno kategorijo blaga.
Therefore, SG&A costs and profit were established pursuant to Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Zato so bili PS&U stroški in dobiček določeni v skladu s členom 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation, the SG&A costs were based on a reasonable method.
V skladu s členom 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe so PS&U stroški temeljili na razumni metodi.
The North American market showed a significant volume of domestic sales and a considerable level of competition from both domestic and foreign companies.
Severnoameriški trg je pokazal znaten obseg domače prodaje ter precejšnjo stopnjo konkurence tako domačih kot tujih družb.
In this respect, consideration was given to publicly available information relating to major companies operating in the fertilisers’ business sector.
V tem smislu so bile obravnavane javno dostopne informacije, ki se nanašajo na večje družbe, ki poslujejo v poslovnem sektorju gnojil.
It was found that the corresponding data from North American (USA and Canadian) producers would be the most appropriate for the purpose of the investigation, given the large availability of reliable and complete public financial information from listed companies in this region of the world.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da bi bili za namene preiskave najprimernejši ustrezni podatki severnoameriških (ZDA in Kanada) proizvajalcev zaradi velike razpoložljivosti zanesljivih in popolnih javnih finančnih informacij javnih družb v tej regiji sveta.
Therefore, SG&A costs and profit were established on the basis of the weighted average SG&A costs and profit from three North American producers, which were found to be amongst the largest companies in the nitrogen fertilisers’ sector, with regard to their domestic sales of the same general category of products (nitrogen fertilisers).
Zato so bili PS&U stroški ter dobiček določeni na podlagi tehtanega povprečja PS&U stroškov in dobička treh severnoameriških proizvajalcev, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da so glede na njihovo domačo prodajo enake splošne kategorije izdelkov (dušikova gnojila) med največjimi družbami v sektorju dušikovih gnojil.