natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Subsequently, in response to Commission requests regarding the sale of certain of Sandretto’s assets to Romi Italia, the Italian authorities provided the following information.
Italijanski organi so nato v odgovor na zahteve Komisije v zvezi s prodajo določenega premoženja podjetja Sandretto podjetju Romi Italia predložili naslednje informacije.
Romi Italia had acquired part of the assets of Sandretto for EUR 7,9 million.
Podjetje Romi Italia je za 7,9 milijona EUR odkupilo del premoženja podjetja Sandretto.
That price was lower than the one at which the company had been valued in June 2007, but it was the highest price to emerge after the failure of several public offers of sale.
Ta cena je bila nižja od tiste, na katero je bilo podjetje ocenjeno junija 2007, vendar je bila najvišja ponujena cena po več neuspelih javnih razpisih za prodajo.
According to the Italian authorities, it should therefore be considered to reflect the market value of the assets concerned.
Po navedbah italijanskih organov je torej treba šteti, da odraža tržno vrednost zadevnih sredstev.
Since 29 July 2008 Sandretto had ceased trading entirely, following an order made by the District Court of Turin, and would disappear as a legal person as soon as its assets were divided among its creditors.
Podjetje Sandretto je 29. julija 2008 povsem prenehalo poslovati, in sicer na podlagi odredbe okrožnega sodišča v Torinu, kot pravna oseba pa bo prenehalo obstajati takoj, ko bo njegovo premoženje razdeljeno med upnike.
The Italian authorities also underlined that Romi Italia had not taken over any of Sandretto’s existing liabilities.
Italijanski organi so še poudarili, da podjetje Romi Italia ni prevzelo nobene od obstoječih obveznosti podjetja Sandretto.
Sandretto had ended all contracts of employment with its employees, and Romi Italia had concluded new and different contracts, only some of them with former Sandretto employees.
Podjetje Sandretto je prekinilo vse pogodbe o zaposlitvi s svojimi zaposlenimi, zato je podjetje Romi Italia sklenilo nove in drugačne pogodbe, samo nekatere (od njih) z nekdanjimi zaposlenimi v podjetju Sandretto.
Romi Italia had not stepped into Sandretto’s place in any relationship with former agents, suppliers or clients of Sandretto, but had merely taken over contracts strictly necessary to the running of the business (contracts for the supply of gas and electricity or maintenance and security services).
Podjetje Romi Italia ni prevzelo vloge podjetja Sandretto v njegovih odnosih z nekdanjimi zastopniki, dobavitelji ali strankami, temveč je prevzelo samo pogodbe, nujno potrebne za poslovanje (pogodbe o dobavi plina in električne energije oziroma storitvah vzdrževanja in varovanja).
The Commission considers that the rescue aid measure constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Komisija meni, da ukrep pomoči za reševanje pomeni državno pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
The measure takes the form of guarantees which constitute an advantage financed by state resources.
Ukrep ima obliko jamstev, ki pomenijo ugodnost, financirano iz državnih sredstev.
The measure is selective, as it is limited to Sandretto, and it is likely to distort competition by providing Sandretto with an advantage over other competitors not receiving aid.
Ukrep je selektiven, saj je omejen na podjetje Sandretto, in lahko povzroči izkrivljanje konkurence, ker podjetju Sandretto daje prednost pred drugimi konkurenti, ki ne prejemajo pomoči.
Finally, there is extensive trade between Member States in the market in which Sandretto operates [8].
In nazadnje, na trgu, na katerem deluje podjetje Sandretto, poteka obsežna trgovinska menjava med državami članicami [8].
Compatibility of the rescue aid
Združljivost pomoči za reševanje
According to point 25(a) of the Guidelines, rescue aid must come to an end within a period of not more than six months after the disbursement of the first instalment to the firm.
V skladu s točko 25(a) Smernic mora pomoč za reševanje prenehati v obdobju največ šestih mesecev po izplačilu prvega obroka podjetju.
However, Italy never did submit a plan for the restructuring (or liquidation) of the company.
Vendar ni Italija nikoli predložila načrta za prestrukturiranje (ali likvidacijo) podjetja.
The conditions for extension laid down in point 26 of the Guidelines are not fulfilled either.
Izpolnjeni niso niti pogoji za podaljšanje, določeni v točki 26 Smernic.
Point 26 of the Guidelines states that rescue aid may be extended until the Commission has adopted a decision on a restructuring plan, if such a plan is submitted within the six-month period, which is not the case here.
V točki 26 Smernic je navedeno, da se lahko pomoč za reševanje podaljša za toliko časa, da Komisija sprejme odločitev o načrtu za prestrukturiranje, če se tak načrt predloži v šestih mesecih, kar pa v tem primeru ni bilo storjeno.
Finally, an extension of the guarantee beyond six months cannot be regarded as (unlawful) restructuring aid either, since there has been no notification of a restructuring plan, or of any measure that might meet the conditions in points 34 et seq. of the Guidelines.
In nazadnje, podaljšanja jamstva čez šestmesečni rok niti ni mogoče šteti za (nezakonito) pomoč za prestrukturiranje, saj ni bil priglašen načrt za prestrukturiranje ali kakršen koli ukrep, ki bi lahko izpolnjeval pogoje iz točke 34 in naslednjih v Smernicah.
It must be concluded, therefore, that the rescue aid has been used in breach of the authorising decision, and cannot be considered to be compatible restructuring aid, since none of the conditions in the Guidelines have been complied with.
Zato je treba ugotoviti, da se je pomoč za reševanje uporabila v nasprotju z odločbo o odobritvi in da je ni mogoče šteti za združljivo pomoč za prestrukturiranje, saj ni bil izpolnjen nobeden od pogojev iz Smernic.
In addition, the company continued to benefit from the rescue aid at the end of the six months indicated in the authorising decision, and the Commission accordingly finds that from 24 January 2008 onward the aid measure was being misused within the meaning of Article 1(g) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [10] (the Procedural Regulation), since it was used by the beneficiary in contravention of a decision taken pursuant to Article 4(3) of that Regulation.
Poleg tega je podjetje prejemalo pomoč za reševanje tudi po koncu šestmesečnega obdobja, navedenega v odločbi o odobritvi, zato Komisija ugotavlja, da se je ukrep pomoči po 24. januarju 2008 zlorabil v smislu člena 1(g) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES [10] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: postopkovna uredba), saj jo je prejemnik uporabil v nasprotju z odločbo, sprejeto na podlagi člena 4(3) navedene uredbe.
Recital 15 of the Procedural Regulation states that misuse of aid may have effects on the functioning of the internal market which are similar to those of unlawful aid and should thus be treated according to similar procedures.
V uvodni izjavi 15 postopkovne uredbe je navedeno, da zloraba pomoči lahko vpliva na delovanje notranjega trga, učinki pa so podobni učinkom nezakonite pomoči in jih je torej treba obravnavati po podobnih postopkih.
Article 14 of the Procedural Regulation states that where a negative decision is taken in a case of unlawful aid, the Commission is to decide that the Member State concerned must take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary.
Člen 14 postopkovne uredbe določa, da če se v primeru nezakonite pomoči sprejme negativna odločba, Komisija odloči, da mora zadevna država članica sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, da upravičenec vrne pomoč.
Article 16 states that Article 14 applies mutatis mutandis in cases of misuse of aid.
Člen 16 določa, da se člen 14 v primerih zlorabe pomoči uporablja smiselno.
By reason of the misuse after 24 January 2008 of the aid granted to Sandretto, therefore, Italy must take all necessary measures to recover the aid, with interest payable from the date on which the aid misused was at the disposal of the beneficiary until the date of its recovery.
Ker se je pomoč, dodeljena podjetju Sandretto, po 24. januarju 2008 zlorabila, mora Italija sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za vračilo pomoči, skupaj z obrestmi, ki se plačajo od datuma, ko je bila zlorabljena pomoč na razpolago upravičencu, do datuma vračila.
After the granting of the aid there was a sale of the assets, in full accordance with the liquidation procedure provided for in Italian law [11], so that the Commission has to verify whether the advantage may have been passed on to the buyer.
Po dodelitvi pomoči je bilo premoženje prodano – v skladu z likvidacijskim postopkom, določenim z italijansko zakonodajo [11] – zato mora Komisija preveriti, ali je ugodnost morda prešla na kupca.
The Commission must accordingly examine whether the assets were sold at a market price.
Komisija mora torej proučiti, ali je bilo premoženje prodano po tržni ceni.
If it should prove that the assets were in fact sold at a price below their market value, the recovery order must be extended to encompass the buyer [12].
Če bi dokazala, da je bilo premoženje v resnici prodano po nižji ceni od tržne, bi bilo treba nalog za izterjavo razširiti na kupca [12].
At the Commission’s request, the Italian authorities informed the Commission [13] that Romi Italia had acquired most of the assets of Sandretto for a total of EUR 7,9 million, made up of EUR 2,48 million for holdings in companies abroad and EUR 5,42 million for other tangible and intangible assets (buildings, machineries, trade marks).
Italijanski organi so Komisiji na njeno zahtevo sporočili [13], da je podjetje Romi Italia odkupilo večino premoženja podjetja Sandretto, in sicer za skupni znesek 7,9 milijona EUR, od tega 2,48 milijona EUR za holdinge in družbe v tujini ter 5,42 milijona EUR za druga opredmetena in neopredmetena sredstva (zgradbe, stroje, blagovne znamke).
The price obtained for the tangible and intangible assets (EUR 5,42 million) was lower than the price at which they were valued in June 2007 (EUR 7,5 million).
Dosežena cena za opredmetena in neopredmetena sredstva (5,42 milijona EUR) je bila nižja od cene, na katero so bila ovrednotena junija 2007 (7,5 milijona EUR).
Nevertheless, this price was higher than any other offer made in the course of the liquidation procedure.
Vendar je bila cena višja od katere koli druge ponudbe med likvidacijskim postopkom.
In view of all the considerations set out above, the Commission has concluded that Romi Italia is not de facto continuing the business of Sandretto.
Komisija je ob upoštevanju navedenega ugotovila, da podjetje Romi Italia v resnici ne nadaljuje dejavnosti podjetja Sandretto.
Consequently, the Commission considers that the operation was a sale of assets, and not of a going concern.
Komisija zato meni, da se je posel nanašal na prodajo premoženja in ne na prodajo delujočega podjetja.
On the basis of the information available to it at the time of adopting the present decision, the Commission has no reason to believe that the price paid by Romi Italia was not a market price.
Komisija na podlagi informacij, ki jih ima na voljo ob sprejetju te odločbe, ne more trditi, da cena, ki jo je plačalo podjetje Roma Italia, ni bila tržna cena.
The Commission therefore takes the view that the aid conferred an advantage only on Sandretto, and that the benefit was not transferred to Romi Italia.
Komisija zato meni, da je pomoč prinesla prednost samo podjetju Sandretto in da se ugodnost ni prenesla na podjetje Romi Italia.
Recovery should therefore be made directly from Sandretto.
Pomoč je torej treba izterjati neposredno od podjetja Sandretto.
The Commission finds that the rescue aid of EUR 5 million, which was extended beyond 24 January 2008 and benefited Sandretto until it ceased trading entirely on 29 June 2009, has been misused, that it cannot be considered compatible with the common market, and that it must be recovered by Italy from the beneficiary, Sandretto,
Komisija ugotavlja, da je bila pomoč za reševanje v višini 5 milijonov EUR, ki se je podaljšala čez 24. januar 2008 in jo je podjetje Sandretto prejemalo do popolnega prenehanja poslovanja 29. junija 2009, zlorabljena, da je ni mogoče šteti za združljivo s skupnim trgom in da jo mora Italija izterjati od upravičenca, tj. podjetja Sandretto –
The State aid amounting to EUR 5 million which was granted by Italy and which was misused in that it remained at the disposal of Sandretto Industrie srl after 24 January 2008 is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč v višini 5 milijonov EUR, ki jo je dodelila Italija in je bila zlorabljena, ker je podjetje Sandretto Industrie srl z njo razpolagalo tudi po 24. januarju 2008, je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiary until their actual recovery.
Zneskom, ki jih je treba izterjati, se pripišejo obresti od datuma, ko so bili dani na razpolago upravičencu, do njihove dejanske izterjave.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 as amended [14].
Obresti se izračunajo na podlagi obrestnoobrestnega računa, v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004, kakor je bila spremenjena [14].
Italy shall cancel all outstanding payments of the aid referred to in Article 1 with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Italija z dnem sprejetja te odločbe prekliče vsa neporavnana plačila pomoči iz člena 1.
Italy shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of notification of this Decision.
Italija zagotovi, da se ta odločba začne izvajati v štirih mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tej odločbi.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Italy shall submit the following information to the Commission:
Italija v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tej odločbi Komisiji predloži naslednje podatke:
the total amount (principal and interest) to be recovered from the beneficiary;
skupni znesek (glavnica in obresti), ki ga je treba izterjati od upravičenca;
a detailed description of the measures already taken and the measures planned in order to comply with this Decision;
podroben opis že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepov za uskladitev s to odločbo;
documents demonstrating that the beneficiary has been ordered to repay the aid.
dokumente, iz katerih je razvidno, da se je od upravičenca zahtevalo vračilo pomoči.
Italy shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 has been completed.
Italija Komisijo do dokončne izterjave pomoči iz člena 1 obvešča o napredku nacionalnih ukrepov, sprejetih za izvajanje te odločbe.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and the measures planned in order to comply with this Decision.
Na zahtevo Komisije takoj predloži podatke o že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepih za uskladitev s to odločbo.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and interest already recovered from the beneficiary.
Zagotovi tudi podrobne podatke o zneskih pomoči in obresti, ki so bili od upravičenca že izterjani.
Decision N 802/06 (OJ C 43, 27.2.2007, p. 2).
Odločitev v zadevi N 802/06 (UL C 43, 27.2.2007, str. 2).
OJ C 137, 4.6.2008, p. 12.
UL C 137, 4.6.2008, str. 12.
Article 54 of Legislative Order (decreto legislativo) No 270 of 1999, see footnote 4 below.
Člen 54 Zakonodajne odredbe (decreto legislativo) št. 270 iz leta 1999, glej opombo 4 spodaj.
Laying down new rules on the extraordinary administration of large enterprises in a state of insolvency under Section 1 of Act No 274 of 30 July 1998, published in Gazzetta ufficiale della Repubblica italiana No 185, 9.8.1999.
O določitvi novih predpisov za izredno upravljanje velikih podjetij, plačilno nesposobnih na podlagi oddelka 1 Akta št. 274 z dne 30. julija 1998, objavljenega v Gazzetta ufficiale della Repubblica italiana št. 185, 9.8.1999.
The remaining assets consist essentially of the Sandretto museum, which displays numerous exhibits illustrating design in plastics.
Preostalo premoženje v glavnem obsega muzej Sandretto, v katerem so razstavljeni številni eksponati, ki prikazujejo modele iz plastike.
See recital 17.
Glej uvodno izjavo 17.
Paragraphs 4-6 of the authorising decision cited in footnote 1.
Odstavki 4–6 odločitve o odobritvi, navedene v opombi 1.
Paragraphs 16-18 of the opening decision.
Odstavki 16–18 odločitve o sprožitvi postopka.
Recital 9 above.
Uvodna izjava 9 zgoraj.
Commission notice, ‘Towards an effective implementation of Commission decisions ordering Member States to recover unlawful and incompatible State aid’, paragraphs 32-35 ( OJ C 272, 15.11.2007, p. 4).
Obvestilo Komisije „Za učinkovito izvajanje odločb Komisije, ki od držav članic zahtevajo dosego vračila nezakonite in nezdružljive državne pomoči“, odstavki 32–35 ( UL C 272, 15.11.2007, str. 4).
Recital 7 above.
Uvodna izjava 7 zgoraj.
Although the rescue aid was approved on 29 January 2007, the credit lines, amounting to EUR 5 million, were granted almost six months after the date of authorisation, one on 24 July 2007 and the other on 13 August 2007.
Čeprav je bila pomoč za reševanje odobrena 29. januarja 2007, sta bili kreditni liniji v višini 5 milijonov EUR dodeljeni skoraj šest mesecev po datumu odobritve, prva 24. julija 2007 in druga 13. avgusta 2007.
According to Italy, the administrators needed this time to select the private banks that would grant the credit and to agree with them on the terms of financing.
Kot je navedla Italija, je toliko časa trajalo, da so upravitelji izbrali zasebni banki, ki bi odobrili posojilo, in se z njima dogovorili o pogojih financiranja.
According to Italy, the guarantee connected to the first instalment of aid was called on 24 January 2008.
Kot je navedla Italija, je bilo jamstvo, povezano s prvim obrokom pomoči, unovčeno 24. januarja 2008.
Italy did not submit a plan for the restructuring of the company (or its liquidation) within the six month following the authorising decision.
Italija v šestih mesecih po odločbi o odobritvi ni predložila načrta za prestrukturiranje podjetja (ali njegovo likvidacijo).
In the present case, the first instalment of the aid was disbursed on 24 July 2007.
V obravnavanem primeru je bil prvi obrok pomoči izplačan 24. julija 2007.
Therefore, the guarantee should have been terminated by 24 January 2008, as acknowledged by the Italian authorities in their submission dated 2 February 2008 [9].
Jamstvo bi tako moralo prenehati najpozneje 24. januarja 2008, kot so italijanski organi potrdili v dopisu z dne 2. februarja 2008 [9].
Rather, at the expiry of the prescribed six months, the guarantee was called, so that Sandretto now had a EUR 5 million debt to the State. So far, Italy has not shown that this debt to the State has been repaid.
Po izteku predpisanih šestih mesecev pa je bilo unovčeno jamstvo, tako da je dolg podjetja Sandretto do države narasel na 5 milijonov EUR. Italija še ni dokazala, da je bil ta dolg do države poplačan.
A review of the contracts between Sandretto and Romi Italia and of the submissions of the Italian authorities shows that Romi Italia did not take over any of Sandretto’s liabilities.
Iz pogodbe med podjetjema Sandretto in Romi Italia ter dopisov italijanskih organov izhaja, da podjetje Romi Italia ni prevzelo nobenih obveznosti podjetja Sandretto.
Sandretto has ended all contracts of employment and Romi Italia has concluded new contracts of employment, only some of them with former Sandretto employees.
Podjetje Sandretto je prekinilo vse pogodbe o zaposlitvi, zato je podjetje Romi Italia sklenilo nove, samo nekatere od njih z nekdanjimi zaposlenimi v podjetju Sandretto.
Romi Italia has not stepped into Sandretto’s place in any relationship with former agents, suppliers or clients of Sandretto, confining itself to taking over contracts necessary to the running of the business.
Podjetje Romi Italia ni prevzelo vloge podjetja Sandretto v njegovih odnosih z nekdanjimi zastopniki, dobavitelji ali strankami, ampak se je omejilo samo na prevzem pogodb, nujno potrebnih za poslovanje.
of 14 April 2010
z dne 14. aprila 2010
amending Directive 2009/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on statistical returns in respect of carriage of goods and passengers by sea
o spremembi Direktive 2009/42/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o statističnih poročilih glede prevoza blaga in potnikov po morju
Having regard to Directive 2009/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on statistical returns in respect of carriage of goods and passengers by sea [1], and in particular Article 3 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2009/42/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. maja 2009 o statističnih poročilih glede prevoza blaga in potnikov po morju [1] in zlasti člena 3 Direktive,
In the production of European Statistics there should be a balance between the needs of the users and the burden on respondents.
Pri pripravi evropske statistike je treba vzpostaviti ravnotežje med potrebami uporabnikov in obremenitvijo dajalcev podatkov.
A technical analysis of the existing data collected under the European legislation on statistical returns in respect of carriage of goods and passengers by sea and of the dissemination policy has been carried out at European level in order to propose possible technical solutions to simplify, as much as possible, the various activities necessary for the statistical production, while keeping the final output in line with present and foreseeable users’ needs.
Na evropski ravni je bila izvedena tehnična analiza obstoječih podatkov, zbranih na podlagi evropske zakonodaje o statističnih poročilih glede prevoza blaga in potnikov po morju in glede politike razširjanja, zaradi priprave predlogov možnih tehničnih rešitev za čim večjo poenostavitev različnih dejavnosti, potrebnih za statistično proizvodnjo, ob ohranjanju skladnosti končnega rezultata s sedanjimi in predvidljivimi potrebami uporabnikov.
As a result of this analysis, the existing quarterly statistics on passenger transport in the main European ports and the existing quarterly statistics on vessel traffic in the main European ports should be transmitted to the Commission (Eurostat) and disseminated on an annual basis, while the variable related to the classification dimension ‘nationality of registration of vessels’ in the existing quarterly statistics on passenger transport in the main European ports should be collected by Member States on a voluntary basis.
Iz te analize sledi, da je treba Komisiji (Eurostatu) poslati in letno razširiti obstoječo četrtletno statistiko prevoza potnikov v glavnih evropskih pristaniščih in obstoječo četrtletno statistiko ladijskega prometa v glavnih evropskih pristaniščih, medtem ko naj bi spremenljivko, povezano z dimenzijo klasifikacije „država registracije plovila“ v obstoječi četrtletni statistiki prevoza potnikov v glavnih evropskih pristaniščih, države članice zbirale prostovoljno.
Directive 2009/42/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Direktivo 2009/42/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the European Statistical System Committee, set up by Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on European statistics [2],
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za evropski statistični sistem, ustanovljenega z Uredbo (ES) št. 223/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. marca 2009 o evropski statistiki [2] –
Annexes IV, V and VIII to Directive 2009/42/EC are replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Priloge IV, V in VIII k Direktivi 2009/42/ES se nadomestijo z besedilom iz Priloge k temu sklepu.
The first reference year for the application of this Decision shall be 2009, covering the 2009 data.
Prvo referenčno leto za uporabo tega sklepa je leto 2009, ki zajema podatke za leto 2009.
Done at Brussels, 14 April 2010.
V Bruslju, 14. aprila 2010