natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Taiwan EUR/tonne
Tajvan EUR/tono
Taiwan index
indeks Tajvan
PRC EUR/tonne
LRK EUR/tono
PRC index
indeks LRK
Total countries concerned (EUR/tonne)
Zadevne države skupaj EUR/tono
Total countries concerned (index)
Zadevne države skupaj (indeks)
As far as import volumes are concerned, the findings of recital 111 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed, i.e. the export volume from the USA was significant within the meaning of Article 3(4) of the basic Regulation and showed an increasing trend.
V zvezi z obsegom uvoza se ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 111 začasne uredbe potrdijo, tj. obseg izvoza iz ZDA v smislu člena 3(4) osnovne uredbe je bil znaten in se je povečeval.
Exports from the USA were also significantly dumped and showed substantial undercutting.
Izvoz iz ZDA je bil v znatni meri dampinški in je kazal na znatno nelojalno nižanje cen.
All product types were exported from the USA by the two cooperating exporting producer and half of the exports of KMPS were also made to unrelated customers.
Vse vrste izdelka sta iz ZDA izvozila dva sodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika in polovica KMPS je bila izvožena nepovezanim strankam.
Thus, it was concluded that the product exported from the USA was sold through the same sales channels and to the same type of customers in the Community as the product produced and sold by the Community industry on the Community market and the product imported from the other countries concerned.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da je bil izdelek, izvožen iz ZDA, prodan po istih prodajnih poteh enakim vrstam strank v Skupnosti kot izdelek, ki ga proizvaja in prodaja industrija Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti, ter izdelek, uvožen iz ostalih zadevnih držav.
Nonetheless, even if KMPS sales of the exporting producer concerned made to the related user in the Community were excluded from the analysis, this would not change the overall picture.
Tudi če bi bila prodaja KMPS zadevnega proizvajalca izvoznika povezanemu uvozniku v Skupnosti izključena iz analize, to ne bi spremenilo splošne slike.
Market shares from the USA would still be above the de minimis threshold and would still show an increasing trend.
Tržni delež ZDA bi še vedno bil nad pragom de minimis in bi kazal trend povečanja.
Likewise, import prices would still show a decreasing trend.
Podobno bi uvozne cene še naprej kazale trend nižanja.
On the basis of the above, the two exporting producers' claim to decumulate imports from the USA when assessing the material injury suffered by the Community industry was not warranted and was rejected.
Na podlagi navedenega trditev dveh proizvajalcev izvoznikov, da je treba pri ocenjevanju znatne škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, uvoz iz ZDA dekumulirati, ni bila upravičena in je bila zato zavrnjena.
One importer claimed that imports from its supplier in Taiwan decreased when considering a period longer than the period considered of this investigation.
En proizvajalec je trdil, da se je ob upoštevanju daljšega obdobja, kot je bilo obdobje, zajeto v tej preiskavi, uvoz od njegovega dobavitelja s Tajvana zmanjšal.
This importer did not, however, submit any figure in support of its claim, or any indication of the time period he was referring to.
Vendar uvoznik ni predložil nobenih številk, ki bi potrdile njegovo trditev, niti navedel obdobja, na katerega se je skliceval.
Furthermore, it is the Community institutions' long standing practice to consider a period including the IP plus the preceding three or four years in the trend analysis, which is considered a reasonable period to evaluate trends and there is no objective reason to deviate from this practice.
Poleg tega imajo institucije Skupnosti dolgo prakso, da v analizi trendov upoštevajo obdobje, zajeto v OP, ter tri ali štiri predhodna leta, kar se šteje za primerno obdobje za oceno trendov, zato ni nobenega objektivnega razloga za odstopanje od te prakse.
It is also noted that, as shown in recital 114 of the provisional Regulation (Table 2), imports from Taiwan increased by almost 20 % during the period considered which translated also in a slight increase of market share (see recital 115 of the provisional Regulation) over the period considered.
Treba je tudi opozoriti, kot je prikazano v uvodni izjavi 114 začasne uredbe (tabela 2), da se je med obravnavanim obdobjem uvoz iz Tajvana povečal za skoraj 20 %, kar je med obravnavanim obdobjem pomenilo tudi rahlo povečanje tržnega deleža (glej uvodno izjavo 115 začasne uredbe).
The importer did not put forward any other reason why Taiwan should be decumulated from the remaining countries concerned, nor did the investigation reveal any reason.
Uvoznik ni predložil nobenih drugih razlogov, zakaj bi bilo treba Tajvan dekumulirati od ostalih zadevnih držav, niti ni takega razloga odkrila preiskava.
The importer's claim in this respect has therefore to be rejected.
Trditev uvoznika v zvezi s tem je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
In the absence of any further comments in this particular respect, the findings in recitals 110 to 113 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker glede tega ni bilo nobenih nadaljnjih pripomb, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od 110 do 113 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Imports into the Community from the countries concerned, market share and prices
Uvoz v Skupnost iz zadevnih držav, tržni delež in cene
Given the findings in recitals 31 to 34, export sales of the Chinese exporting producer which were found to be dumped had to be included in the analyses of import volume, market share and prices from the PRC and the figures in Tables 2 to 4 (recitals 114 to 116 of the provisional Regulation had therefore to be adapted accordingly, as follows:
Ob upoštevanju ugotovitev uvodnih izjav od 31 do 34 je bilo v analizo obsega uvoza treba vključiti ugotovljeni dampinški izvoz kitajskega proizvajalca izvoznika in ustrezno prilagoditi tržni delež in cene iz LRK ter vrednosti v tabelah od 2 do 4 (uvodne izjave 114 do 116 začasne uredbe):
Imports from the countries concerned increased by 53 % between 2003 and the IP.
Uvoz iz zadevnih držav se je povečal za 53 % med letom 2003 in OP.
While these imports amounted to 9839 tonnes in 2003 they reached a level of 15065 tonnes during the IP.
Medtem, ko je zadevni uvoz leta 2003 znašal 9839 ton, je med OP dosegel raven 15065 ton.
The increase of imports was particularly marked between 2003 and 2004 since they rose by 38 %.
Povečanje uvoza je bilo še posebej opazno med letoma 2003 in 2004, kjer se je povečal za 38 %.
Market shared of the countries concerned
Tržni delež zadevnih držav
The market share held by the countries concerned increased between 2003 and the IP from 25,3 % to 36,1 %, i.e. by 10,8 percentage points.
Tržni delež zadevnih držav se je med letom 2003 in OP povečal s 25,3 % na 36,1 %, tj. za 10,8 odstotne točke.
The increase was particularly marked between 2003 and 2004 when it went up by 7 percentage points.
Povečanje je bilo zlasti opazno med letoma 2003 in 2004, ko se je za 7 odstotnih točk.
From 2003 to the IP, prices of the imports from the countries concerned decreased by 13 %.
Od leta 2003 do OP so se cene uvoza iz zadevnih držav znižale za 13 %.
Thus, they decreased from EUR 902/tonne in 2003 to EUR 784/tonne in the IP.
Tako so se z 902 EUR/tono leta 2003 znižale na 784 EUR/tono med OP.
In the absence of any other comments in this particular regard the findings and conclusions set out in recitals 114 to 119 of the provisional Regulation, are confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s tem ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se ugotovitve in sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od 114 do 119 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The two exporting producers in the USA claimed that the Community industry realised ‘reasonable’ profit margins during the IP, and in any case was not loss making, and it cannot therefore be concluded that it suffered material injury during the IP.
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika iz ZDA sta trdila, da je med obdobjem OP industrija Skupnosti dosegala „običajne“ stopnje dobička, v vsakem primeru pa ni imela izgube, zato ni mogoče skleniti, da je med OP utrpela znatno škodo.
One of the exporting producers in the USA further claimed that the high profit margins realised in 2003 would also be an indication that the Community industry did not suffer any material injury.
Poleg tega je en proizvajalec izvoznik iz ZDA trdil, da bi tudi visoke stopnje dobička, ustvarjene leta 2003, lahko kazale, da industrija Skupnosti ni utrpela nobene znatne škode.
In accordance with Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, the impact of the dumped imports must include an evaluation of all relevant factors and indices having a bearing on the state of the Community industry.
V skladu s členom 3(5) osnovne uredbe mora učinek dampinškega uvoza vključevati oceno vseh pomembnih dejavnikov in indeksov, ki vplivajo na položaj industrije Skupnosti.
In this respect, none of the factors in isolation can give decisive guidance.
V zvezi s tem ni odločilen noben posamezen dejavnik.
The analysis of the situation of the Community industry is therefore not limited to the profitability of the Community industry alone, but must include all factors listed in that Article.
Analiza stanja industrije Skupnosti zato ni omejena samo na donosnost industrije Skupnosti, ampak mora vključevati vse dejavnike, navedene v navedenem členu.
Furthermore, as outlined in recital 131 of the provisional Regulation, profitability dropped substantially during the period considered, i.e. by 80 %, and as a result the Community industry's financial situation deteriorated dramatically.
Poleg tega, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 131 začasne uredbe, se je med obravnavanim obdobjem donosnost znatno zmanjšala, tj. za 80 %, kar je povzročilo dramatično poslabšanje finančnega stanja industrije Skupnosti.
In this context, it was considered that it was irrelevant whether the Community industry did indeed realise losses during the IP.
V tem smislu ni bilo pomembno, ali je industrija Skupnosti izgube ustvarila med OP.
It is also noted that the profit margin that the Community industry could reasonably expect to achieve in the absence of dumped imports was determined in recital 169 of the provisional Regulation and confirmed in recital 154 with 12 %, i.e. significantly higher than the profit margin realised during the IP.
Prav tako je treba opozoriti, da je bila običajna stopnja dobička, ki bi jo industrija Skupnosti lahko ustvarila brez dampinškega uvoza, določena v uvodni izjavi 169 začasne uredbe ter potrjena v uvodni izjavi 154 v nadaljevanju, in sicer na 12 %, kar je znatno nad stopnjo dobička, ustvarjeno med OP.
With reference to the claim that the high profit margins realised in 2003 would be an indication that the Community industry did not suffer any material injury, it is noted that even if disregarding the profit margins realised in that year, the trend would still be significantly negative.
V zvezi s trditvijo, da bi visoke stopnje dobička, ustvarjenega leta 2003, lahko pomenile, da industrija Skupnosti ni utrpela nobene znatne škode, je treba opozoriti, da bi bil trend še vedno zelo negativen tudi ob neupoštevanju stopenj dobička, ustvarjenih v navedenem letu.
Thus, profits fell between 2004 and the IP by almost 60 %.
Dobiček se je tako med letom 2004 in OP zmanjšal za skoraj 60 %.
This would thus not change the overall conclusions that the Community industry suffered material injury during the IP.
Zato to ne bi spremenilo splošnih sklepnih ugotovitev, da je industrija Skupnosti med OP utrpela znatno škodo.
One exporting producer in the USA alleged that the profitability of Community industry may have decreased because of a EUR 830 million write-off of intangible assets linked to the acquisition of Laporte in 2005.
En proizvajalec izvoznik iz ZDA je trdil, da se je donosnost industrije Skupnosti lahko zmanjšala zaradi 830 milijonov EUR vrednega odpisa neopredmetenih sredstev, povezanih z nakupom Laporta leta 2005.
It should be however noted that the downward trend of the profitability as set out in the provisional Regulation is constant over the period considered and not linked to a specific year.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da je bil v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju trend zmanjševanja donosnosti, opisan v začasni uredbi, stalen in ni bil vezan na določeno leto.
In addition, the investigation revealed that the cost for the acquisition of Laporte was taken by the holding company, not by Degussa Initiators Co. Ltd. This factor did therefore not have any impact on the profitability trends as shown in the provisional Regulation.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da je stroške za nakup Laporta kril holding ne pa Degussa Initiators Co., Ltd. Ta dejavnik torej ni imel nobenega učinka na trend donosnosti, kot je navedeno v začasni uredbi.
Finally, one of the exporting producers in the USA claimed that the injury analysis was based on wrong expectations of the Community industry to obtain profit margins which are above the average of this industry.
Poleg tega je en proizvajalec izvoznik iz ZDA trdil, da je analiza škode temeljila na napačnih pričakovanjih industrije Skupnosti, da bo njena stopnja dobička nad povprečjem te industrije.
With regard to this argument, it should first be noted that, as it becomes apparent from recitals 120 to 139 of the provisional Regulation, the injury analysis was based on the developments of all injury indicators during the period considered and thus on the actual situation of the Community industry during that period, which gave an objective picture based on verified actual data.
V zvezi s to utemeljitvijo je treba najprej opozoriti, da je iz uvodnih izjav 120 do 139 začasne uredbe razvidno, da je analiza škode med obravnavanim obdobjem temeljila na razvoju vseh kazalnikov škode, torej na dejanskem stanju industrije Skupnosti med obravnavanim obdobjem, rezultat pa je bil opis objektivnega stanja, ki je temeljilo na preverjenih dejanskih podatkih.
In other words, the Community expectations as such did not serve as a basis in the injury analysis and this argument was therefore rejected.
Z drugimi besedami, pričakovanja industrije Skupnosti kot taka niso bila podlaga za analizo škode, zato je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
One user alleged that there was no price depression on the Community market, but did not submit any evidence to support this claim.
En uporabnik je trdil, da na trgu Skupnosti ni bilo padca cen, vendar za svojo trditev ni predložil dokazov.
Since the verified information submitted by the exporting producers concerned and the Community industry clearly showed a downward trend in average selling prices during the period considered, this claim had to be rejected.
Ker so preverjene predložene informacije zadevnih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in industrije Skupnosti jasno kazale na padajoči trend povprečnih prodajnih cen med obravnavanim obdobjem, bo trditev treba zavrniti.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the situation of the Community industry, recitals 120 to 139 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi s položajem industrije Skupnosti, se uvodne izjave od 120 do 139 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Effects of dumped imports
Učinki dampinškega uvoza
In the absence of any comments concerning the effects of dumped imports, the findings in recitals 141 to 143 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb v zvezi z učinki dampinškega uvoza, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 141 do 143 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Imports originating in third countries other than the PRC, USA and Taiwan
Uvoz s poreklom iz tretjih držav, razen LRK, ZDA in Tajvana
Both exporting producers in the USA alleged that imports from other countries, and in particular from Turkey, may have caused injury to the Community industry particularly in view of their prices which are allegedly lower than the prices from the USA.
Oba proizvajalca izvoznika iz ZDA sta trdila, da je škodo industriji Skupnosti lahko povzročil uvoz iz drugih držav, predvsem iz Turčije, in sicer zlasti v zvezi s cenami, ki so bile domnevno nižje kot cene v ZDA.
In particular, it was claimed that these imports were made in significant quantities and at dumped prices which undercut significantly the Community industry prices.
Trdila sta predvsem, da je bil navedeni uvoz znaten in po dampinških cenah, ki so nelojalno nižale cene industrije Skupnosti.
Both exporting producers claimed that imports from Turkey had injured the Community industry at least to the same degree as imports from the USA, if not to a larger extent.
Oba proizvajalca izvoznika sta trdila, da je uvoz iz Turčije industriji Skupnosti povzročil vsaj tako škodo kot uvoz iz ZDA, če ne večje.
First, it should be noted that Turkey was not included in the complaint because the complainants had not found any evidence of injurious dumping from Turkey.
Najprej je treba opozoriti, da Turčija ni bila vključena v pritožbo, ker pritožniki niso odkrili nobenega dokaza o škodljivem dampingu iz Turčije.
At the time of the initiation of this proceeding, the Commission did not have any evidence at its disposal that contradicted the complainants' statement.
Komisija na začetku tega postopka ni imela nobenih dokazov, ki bi nasprotovali izjavi pritožnikov.
Secondly, the fact that Turkish export prices may appear to be lower than the prices from the USA when looking at average prices emanating from Eurostat trade statistics may be the result of a different product mix exported by the two countries.
Drugič, ob upoštevanju povprečnih cen iz trgovinske statistike Eurostata se morda lahko zdi, da so turške cene nižje od cen v ZDA, vendar je to lahko posledica razlike med izvoznimi prodajnimi programi obeh držav.
Indeed, on the basis of available information, the exports from the USA consist to a large extent of KMPS whereas, neither at initiation stage nor during the investigation, was any evidence available that Turkish exports to the Community show a similar product mix.
Na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij je bilo ugotovljeno, da je uvoz iz ZDA sestavljen pretežno iz KMPS, medtem ko na začetku postopka niti med preiskavo ni bil predložen noben dokaz, da gre pri izvozu iz Turčije v Skupnost za podoben prodajni program.
Therefore, no meaningful conclusion could be drawn from differences in average Eurostat prices.
Zato na podlagi razlik v povprečnih Eurostatovih cenah ni mogoče sprejeti nobene sklepne ugotovitve.
Finally, it should be recalled that neither was any such evidence provided by the exporting producers concerned.
Nazadnje je treba opozoriti, da tudi proizvajalca izvoznika nista predložila nobenega takega dokaza.
When analysing the situation of the Community industry, the effects of the dumped imports from all three exporting countries concerned were assessed cumulatively for the reasons set out in recitals 48 to 55.
Pri analiziranju stanja industrije Skupnosti so bili učinki dampinškega uvoza iz vseh treh zadevnih držav iz razlogov, navedenih v uvodnih izjavah od 48 do 55, ocenjeni kumulativno.
On this basis, it was considered inappropriate to base the analysis with regard to causation on each country concerned separately.
Na podlagi tega se je štelo za neprimerno, da se analiza vzročne zveze za vsako zadevno državo utemelji posebej.
However, even if considering imports from the USA separately, import trends from the USA and Turkey are different.
Vendar sta, tudi če se uvoz iz ZDA upošteva posebej, uvozna trenda iz ZDA in Turčije različna.
While import volumes of Turkey significantly decreased during the period considered (i.e. by 42 %), import volume and market share from the USA increased.
Medtem ko se je med obravnavanim obdobjem uvoz iz Turčije znatno zmanjšal (tj. za 42 %), sta se uvoz iz ZDA in njen tržni delež povečala.
As far as prices are concerned no evidence of dumping from Turkey was submitted by the exporting producer or was otherwise available.
V zvezi s cenami ni proizvajalec izvoznik predložil nobenega dokaza za damping iz Turčije, pa tudi sicer dokazov za to ni bilo na voljo.
Likewise, as far as undercutting is concerned, on the basis of the evidence available, the product mix exported from Turkey was different from that from the USA; in particular in Turkey there was no production of KMPS.
V zvezi z nelojalnim nižanjem cen je bilo na podlagi dokazov, ki so bili na voljo, ugotovljeno, da je bil izvozni program iz Turčije drugačen od tistega iz ZDA, predvsem pa v Turčiji ni bilo proizvodnje KMPS.
When comparing average prices from the USA excluding exports of KMPS and average export prices from Turkey, it was found that Turkish prices were higher than the prices from the USA.
Primerjava povprečnih cen iz ZDA brez izvoza KMPS ter povprečnih izvoznih cen iz Turčije je razkrila, da so bile turške cene višje kot ameriške.
On the basis of the above, the conclusions as set out in recitals 144 to 148 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Na podlagi navedenega se sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od 144 do 148 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
It was reiterated by several interested Parties that the imports of one Community producer of the product concerned from its related company in PRC were dumped and undercut the Community industry sales prices causing the price depression on the Community market.
Več zainteresiranih strank je ponovilo trditve, da je en proizvajalec Skupnosti zadevni izdelek dampinško uvažal od svoje povezane družbe v LRK in tako nelojalno nižal prodajne cene industrije Skupnosti ter povzročil padec cen na trgu Skupnosti.
Any injury would therefore be a consequence of these imports and thus self-inflicted.
Vsa škoda bi bila zato posledica navedenega uvoza in torej samopovzročena.
Imports of the Community industry from its related company in the PRC only represented a minor part of the Community consumption (less than 4 %) and less than 8 % of the sales of the Community producer in question and were only made to maintain the custom of global customers who would otherwise have purchased the product concerned from the Chinese suppliers at dumped prices.
Uvoz industrije Skupnosti od svoje povezane družbe v LRK je pomenil samo manjši del porabe Skupnosti (manj kot 4 %) in manj kot 8 % prodaje zadevnega proizvajalca Skupnosti ter je bil opravljen zgolj za ohranitev strank po svetu, ki bi sicer zadevni izdelek po dampinških cenah kupile od kitajskih dobaviteljev.
None of the abovementioned interested Parties submitted any evidence or explained how these relatively small quantities (in comparison to the dumped imports made to unrelated customers in the Community) could have been the main factor for the price depression in the Community market and this claim had therefore to be rejected.
Nobena od navedenih zainteresiranih strank ni predložila dokazov ali pojasnila, kako naj bi bila ta relativno majhna količina (v primerjavi z dampinškim uvozom nepovezanim strankam v Skupnosti) glavni dejavnik za padec cen na trgu Skupnosti, zato je bilo treba to trditev zavrniti.
Investments of the Community industry in the PRC
Naložbe industrije Skupnosti v LRK
One of the exporting producers in the USA claimed that the downward trend of the investment activities of the Community industry shown in Table 8 of the provisional Regulation was due to an increased investment activity of one of the Community producers in its related company in the PRC and thus not due to the dumped imports.
En proizvajalec izvoznik iz ZDA je trdil, da za trend zmanjševanja naložbenih dejavnosti industrije Skupnosti, prikazan v tabeli 8 začasne uredbe, ni kriv dampinški uvoz, ampak večja naložbena dejavnost enega od proizvajalcev Skupnosti v svoji povezani družbi v LRK.
It is noted that the spare capacity of the Community industry was high, i.e. reached almost 30 % during the IP.
Treba je opozoriti, da so bile neizkoriščene zmogljivosti industrije Skupnosti visoke, saj so med OP dosegle skoraj 30 %.