natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Concerning gas, the United Kingdom has also implemented not only Directive 98/30/EC, but also Directive 2003/55/EC.
Tudi v zvezi s plinom Združeno kraljestvo izvaja ne le Direktivo 98/30/ES, ampak tudi Direktivo 2003/55/ES.
Consequently, and in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 30(3), access to the market should be deemed not to be restricted, both in respect of electricity and gas.
Na podlagi tega in v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 30(3) dostop do trga za električno energijo in plin ne sme biti omejen.
Direct exposure to competition should be evaluated on the basis of various indicators, none of which are, per se, decisive.
Neposredno izpostavljenost konkurenci je treba ocenjevati na podlagi različnih pokazateljev, od katerih sam po sebi ni nobeden odločilen.
In the 2005 Report, the Commission stated that ‘many national markets display a high degree of concentration of the industry, impeding the development of effective competition’ [8].
Komisija je v Poročilu iz leta 2005 navedla, da „mnogo nacionalnih trgov kaže visoko stopnjo koncentracije industrije, ki ovira razvoj učinkovite konkurence“ [8].
Consequently, it considered that ‘one indicator for the degree of competition on national markets is the total market share of the biggest three producers (electricity) and wholesale suppliers (gas)’ [9].
Zato je menila, da je „eden od pokazateljev stopnje konkurence na nacionalnih trgih skupni tržni delež treh največjih proizvajalcev (električna energija) in grosistov (plin)“ [9].
According to the latest available information, the aggregate market share of the three largest electricity generators of the total production is 39 % [10], while the aggregate market share of the three largest gas shippers in percentage of the wholesale market is 36 % [11].
Glede na zadnje razpoložljive podatke je skupni tržni delež treh največjih proizvajalcev električne energije v celotni proizvodnji električne energije 39 % [10], medtem ko je skupni tržni delež treh največjih dobaviteljev plina v odstotkih na grosističnem trgu 36 % [11].
Both these levels must be considered to be at a satisfactorily low level and should be taken as an indication of direct exposure to competition.
Obe stopnji je treba obravnavati kot zadovoljivo nizki in ju upoštevati kot znak neposredne izpostavljenosti konkurenci.
The degree of liquidity is also a good indicator of competition, as the conditions of competition in electricity and gas supply are greatly influenced by liquidity in wholesale markets.
Stopnja likvidnosti je prav tako dober pokazatelj konkurence, ker na pogoje konkurence pri oskrbi z električno energijo in plinom močno vpliva likvidnost grosističnih trgov.
The United Kingdom wholesale market for electricity is characterised by being a bilateral trading market, with brokered deals.
Za grosistični trg Združenega kraljestva za električno energijo je značilno, da je dvostranski trg z borznoposredniškimi posli.
There is also more than one power exchange, although UKPX has the largest volume.
Obstaja več kot ena energetska borza, čeprav ima borza UKPX največji obseg poslovanja.
Some of the principal actors on the wholesale market are the owners of generation capacity, with ownership of generation capacity being rather diverse with eight companies sharing around 70 % of capacity.
Nekateri od glavnih udeležencev na grosističnem trgu so lastniki proizvodnih zmogljivosti, pri čemer je lastništvo proizvodne zmogljivosti zelo raznoliko, ker si 8 podjetij deli približno 70 % zmogljivosti.
For the United Kingdom, liquidity multiple term trading amounts to around three times the amount consumed [12].
V Združenem kraljestvu je likvidnostno trgovanje pod različnimi pogoji približno dvakrat večje od porabe [12].
This degree of liquidity should be considered as being satisfactory, i.e. it is such as to constitute an indicator of a well-functioning and competitive wholesale market.
Ta stopnja likvidnosti se mora obravnavati kot zadovoljiva, kar pomeni, da je pokazatelj dobro delujočega in konkurenčnega grosističnega trga.
For the gas sector, liquidity multiple term trading should also be considered to be at a satisfactory level, as it also amounts to two to three times total consumption [13].
Tudi za plinski sektor je likvidnostno trgovanje pod različnimi pogoji na zadovoljivi ravni, ker je prav tako 2–3-krat večje od skupne porabe [13].
At the retail levels as well, there are a sufficient number of actors, as there are six main suppliers active in the household market with additional companies active in the large user sector.
Na maloprodajnih ravneh je prav tako zadostno število udeležencev, ker obstaja šest glavnih dobaviteljev, ki oskrbujejo gospodinjstva, in dodatna podjetja, ki so dejavna v sektorju večjih uporabnikov [14].
The gas markets are also characterised by a sufficient number of active players and can be summarised as follows: ‘The (United Kingdom) gas market has a high level of competition with around 10 companies active in the wholesale market.
Tudi za trge s plinom je značilno zadostno število dejavnih udeležencev, kar izraža naslednji povzetek: „Na trgu s plinom (Združenega kraljestva) prevladuje močna konkurenca s približno 10 podjetji, ki so dejavna na grosističnem trgu.
As with electricity, six companies account for the majority of the domestic supply market … (of which) … five are new entrants to the gas supply market.
Na področju električne energije predstavlja 6 podjetij večino trga domače oskrbe … (od katerih) … je pet podjetij šele vstopilo na trg oskrbe s plinom.
Larger users buy direct from the wholesale market, which also includes many major oil companies’ [15]. These factors should therefore be taken as an indication of direct exposure to competition.
Večji uporabniki kupujejo neposredno na grosističnem trgu, vključno s številnimi večjimi naftnimi družbami.“ [15] Te dejavnike je treba zato upoštevati kot pokazatelja neposredne izpostavljenosti konkurenci.
The workings of the balancing markets should also be considered as indicators, not only in respect of production but also for the wholesale and retail markets.
Delovanje izravnalnih trgov je treba prav tako šteti za pokazatelja, ne le v zvezi s proizvodnjo, ampak tudi za grosistične in maloprodajne trge.
In fact, ‘any market participant who cannot easily match its generation portfolio to the characteristics of its customers may find itself exposed to the difference between the price at which the TSO (transmission system operator) will sell imbalance energy, and the price at which it will buy back excess production.
Dejansko „je lahko vsak udeleženec na trgu, ki svoj proizvodni portfelj težko prilagodi lastnostim svojih strank, izpostavljen razliki med ceno, po kateri bo upravljavec prenosnega sistema prodajal izravnalno električno energijo, in ceno, po kateri bo odkupil presežno proizvodnjo.
These prices may either be directly imposed by the regulator on the TSO; or alternatively a market based mechanism will be used in which the price is determined by bids from other producers to regulate their production upwards or downwards … a key difficulty for small market participants arises where there is the risk of a large spread between the buying price from the TSO and the selling price.
Te cene lahko upravljavcu prenosnega sistema neposredno predpiše regulatorni organ ali pa se kot nadomestna rešitev uporabi mehanizem na tržni podlagi, po katerem se cena določi na podlagi ponudb drugih proizvajalcev, ki lahko tako svojo proizvodnjo popravijo navzgor ali navzdol. (…) Glavna težava za male udeležence na trgu se pojavi, kadar obstaja nevarnost velike razlike med nakupno ceno upravljavca prenosnega sistema in prodajno ceno.
This occurs in a number of Member States and is likely to be detrimental to the development of competition.
To se pojavlja v več državah članicah in lahko škodi razvoju konkurence.
A high spread may be indicative of an insufficient level of competition in the balancing market which may be dominated by only one or two main generators.
Velika razlika je lahko pokazatelj nezadostne stopnje konkurence na izravnalnem trgu, na katerem lahko prevladujeta samo eden ali dva glavna proizvajalca.
Such difficulties are made worse where network users are unable to adjust their positions close to real time’ [16]. Since the introduction of the British Electricity Trading and Transmission Arrangements (BETTA) there has been a unified balancing market for England, Scotland and Wales.
Takšne težave so lahko še hujše, če uporabniki omrežij niso sposobni prilagoditi stanja realnemu času.“ [16] Od uvedbe britanskega sistema za trgovanje z električno energijo in njen prenos (British Electricity Trading and Transmission Arrangements – BETTA) obstaja enotni izravnalni trg za Anglijo, Škotsko in Wales.
Furthermore, its main characteristics (market based pricing, half-hourly gate closures and a fairly low spread) are such that it should be taken as an indicator of direct exposure to competition.
Poleg tega so njegove glavne značilnosti (tržno določanje cen, možnost prilagajanja vsake pol ure in sorazmerno nizke cenovne razlike) takšne, da lahko veljajo kot pokazatelj neposredne izpostavljenosti konkurenci.
Similarly for gas, balancing prices are derived on the basis of a market mechanism operated by the TSO.
Podobno so tudi za plin izravnalne cene določene na podlagi tržnega mehanizma, ki ga upravlja upravljavec prenosnega sistema.
Imbalances are settled on a daily basis and there is not usually a significant spread between the buy and sell price.
Neskladnosti se izravnavajo vsak dan, kupna in prodajna cena pa se običajno ne razlikujeta veliko.
This non discriminatory mechanism does not act as a barrier to suppliers.
Ta nediskriminacijski mehanizem ne ovira dobaviteljev.
Given the characteristics of the products concerned here (electricity and gas) and the scarcity or unavailability of suitable substitutable products or services, price competition and price formation assume greater importance when assessing the competitive state of the electricity and gas markets.
Ob upoštevanju značilnosti zadevnih proizvodov (električna energija in plin) ter pomanjkanja ali odsotnosti primernih nadomestnih proizvodov ali storitev je treba cenovni konkurenci in oblikovanju cen pri ocenjevanju stanja konkurence na trgih električne energije in plina pripisati večjo pomembnost.
The number of customers switching supplier is an indicator of genuine price competition and, thus, indirectly, ‘a natural indicator of the effectiveness of competition.
Število odjemalcev, ki menjajo dobavitelja, je pokazatelj resnične cenovne konkurence in zato posredno „naravni pokazatelj učinkovitosti konkurence.
If few customers are switching, there is likely to be a problem with the functioning of the market, even if the benefits from the possibility of renegotiating with the historical supplier should not be ignored’ [17].
Če menja dobavitelja malo odjemalcev, obstaja verjetno problem pri delovanju trga, čeprav ne smemo prezreti koristi, ki jih prinaša možnost ponovnega pogajanja s prejšnjim dobaviteljem“ [17]. Poleg tega „obstoj reguliranih cen za končne uporabnike nedvomno bistveno vpliva na vedenje odjemalcev.
In the UK, the degree of switching for the three categories of users of electricity — large and very large industrial users, small and medium-sized industrial and business, and very small business and household users — is above 70 % for the first two groups and close to 50 % for the last category [19] and end-user price control was abolished in respect of electricity in 2002 [20].
V Združenem kraljestvu je stopnja menjav pri treh skupinah uporabnikov električne energije – velikih in zelo velikih industrijskih uporabnikih, malih in srednje velikih industrijskih in poslovnih uporabnikih ter zelo majhnih poslovnih in gospodinjskih uporabnikih – nad 70 % pri prvih dveh skupinah in skoraj 50 % pri zadnji skupini [19], medtem ko je bil nadzor nad cenami električne energije za končne uporabnike leta 2002 ukinjen [20].
Concerning gas, the degree of switching for the three categories of users — large and very large industrial users including power plants, small and medium-sized industrial and business, and very small business and households — is above 70 % for the first two groups and close to 50 % for the last category [21].
V zvezi s plinom je stopnja menjav pri treh skupinah uporabnikov – velikih in zelo velikih industrijskih uporabnikih, vključno z elektrarnami, malih in srednje velikih industrijskih in poslovnih uporabnikih ter zelo majhnih poslovnih in gospodinjskih uporabnikih – nad 70 % pri prvih dveh skupinah in skoraj 50 % pri zadnji skupini [21].
Price controls for all end users have been removed since 2002.
Nadzor nad cenami za vse končne uporabnike je bil leta 2002 ukinjen.
In view of these indicators and given the overall picture of this sector in England, Scotland and Wales — in particular the extent to which networks have been unbundled from generation/supply and the effective regulation of network access — that emerges from the information submitted by the United Kingdom, the 2005 Report and the Technical Annex thereto as well as from the Preliminary Report, the condition of direct exposure to competition laid down in Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC should be considered to be met in respect of electricity and gas supply in England, Scotland and Wales.
Ob upoštevanju pokazateljev in splošnega stanja v tem sektorju v Angliji, na Škotskem in v Walesu – zlasti glede na obseg, v katerem so bila omrežja ločena od proizvodnje/oskrbe, in učinkovito ureditev dostopa do omrežja – ki je razvidno iz informacij Združenega kraljestva, Poročila za leto 2005 in Tehnične priloge k Poročilu ter predhodnega poročila, se šteje, da je pogoj v zvezi z neposredno izpostavljenostjo konkurenci iz člena 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES glede oskrbe z električno energijo in plinom v Angliji, na Škotskem in v Walesu izpolnjen.
As noted in recital 7, the further condition of free access to the activity must be deemed to be met.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj v uvodni izjavi 7, je treba šteti, da je naslednji pogoj za prost dostop do dejavnosti izpolnjen.
Consequently, Directive 2004/17/EC should not apply when contracting entities award contracts intended to enable the supply of electricity and/or gas generation to be carried out in these geographical areas nor when they organise design contests for the pursuit of such an activity there.
Zato se Direktiva 2004/17/ES ne sme uporabljati niti v primerih, kadar naročniki oddajo naročila za omogočanje oskrbe z električno energijo in/ali proizvodnjo plina na teh zemljepisnih območjih, niti kadar organizirajo natečaje za tamkajšnje izvajanje takšne dejavnosti.
It is recalled that contracts awarded for the pursuit of other activities, such as the distribution of electricity and gas, continue to be subject to the provisions of Directive 2004/17/EC.
Opozoriti je treba, da za pogodbe, sklenjene za izvajanje drugih dejavnosti, kot je distribucija električne energije in plina, še naprej veljajo določbe Direktive 2004/17/ES.
This Decision is based on the legal and factual situation as of November 2006 as it appears from the information submitted by the United Kingdom, the 2005 Report and the Technical Annex thereto.
Ta odločba temelji na pravnem in dejanskem stanju iz novembra 2006, kot je razvidno iz informacij Združenega kraljestva, Poročila za leto 2005 in Tehnične priloge k Poročilu.
Directive 2004/17/EC shall not apply to contracts awarded by contracting entities and intended to enable them to carry out electricity and/or gas supply in England, Scotland and Wales.
Direktiva 2004/17/ES se ne uporablja za naročila, ki naročnikom omogočajo oskrbo z električno energijo in/ali plinom v Angliji, na Škotskem in v Walesu.
Directive as last amended by Commission Decision 2006/653/EC (OJ L 270, 29.9.2006, p. 72).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo Komisije 2006/653/ES (UL L 270, 29.9.2006, str. 72).
OJ L 204, 21.7.1998, p. 1.
UL L 204, 21.7.1998, str. 1.
Of the order of approximately 4 % of peak demand in the case of electricity.
V primeru električne energije približno 4 % največjega povpraševanja.
See p. 2. See also the ‘Report from the Commission: Annual Report On The Implementation Of The Gas And Electricity Internal Market’, COM(2004) 863 final of 5.1.2005, p. 4.
Glej opombo 7.
See the 2005 Report, p. 7.
Prim. Poročilo 2005, str. 7.
See Commission Staff Working Document, Technical Annex to the 2005 Report, SEC(2005)1448, p. 44, table 4.1.
Glej Delovni dokument osebja Komisije, Tehnična priloga k Poročilu za leto 2005, SEC(2005) 1448, str. 44, tabela 4.1.
Hereafter referred to as Technical Annex.
V nadaljnjem besedilu Tehnična priloga.
Technical Annex, p. 55, table 5.1.
Tehnična priloga, str. 55, tabela 5.1.
See the Preliminary Report of the Sector Inquiry into Competition in Gas and Electricity Markets (in the following referred to as ‘Preliminary Report’), Figure 42, p. 113.
Glej Predhodno poročilo preiskave sektorja v zvezi s konkurenco na trgu s plinom in električno energijo (v nadaljevanju „Predhodno poročilo“), slika 42, str. 113.
Preliminary Report, point 64, p. 25.
Predhodno poročilo, odstavek 64, str. 25.
Technical Annex, p. 177.
Tehnična priloga, str. 177.
Technical Annex, p. 178.
Tehnična priloga, str. 178.
2005 Report, p. 9.
Poročilo 2005, str. 9.
2005 Report p. 10.
Poročilo 2005, str. 10.
Technical Annex p. 177.
Tehnična priloga, str. 177.
In respect of gas, it should also be concluded that the relevant geographic market is Great Britain, since, as noted by the British Office of Fair Trade, ‘this is the limit of the gas trading regime: although gas is traded with continental Europe through the Bacton-Zeebrugge interconnector, quantities traded are relatively small.’ The same applies to quantities traded between Great Britain and Northern Ireland (not covered by this Decision) and Ireland.
V zvezi s plinom je treba prav tako skleniti, da je zadevni geografski trg Velika Britanija, ker je v skladu z ugotovitvijo Britanskega urada za pravično trgovino „to meja za ureditev trgovanja s plinom; čeprav trgovanje s plinom s celinsko Evropo poteka po povezovalnem daljnovodu Bacton-Zeebrugge, so količine, s katerimi se trguje, sorazmerno majhne.“ Isto velja tudi za količine, s katerimi se trguje med Veliko Britanijo in Severno Irsko (ki ni vključena v to odločbo) ter Republiko Irsko.
Furthermore, ‘the existence of regulated end-user prices is clearly a key determinant of customer behaviour … Although the retaining of controls may be justified in a period of transition, these will increasingly cause distortions as the need for investment approaches’ [18].
(…) Čeprav je v prehodnem obdobju ohranitev nadzora mogoče upravičiti, bo ta povzročal še večje izkrivljanje, ko se bo pojavila potreba po naložbah“ [18].
of 28 February 2007
z dne 28. februarja 2007
establishing a Community Veterinary Emergency Team to assist the Commission in supporting Member States and third countries in veterinary matters relating to certain animal diseases
o vzpostavitvi veterinarske skupine Skupnosti za izredne dogodke, ki bi Komisiji pomagala pri podpiranju držav članic in tretjih držav pri veterinarskih zadevah, povezanih z nekaterimi boleznimi živali
In the event of outbreaks of certain animal diseases or suspicion thereof, the Commission is required to provide assistance to the Member States and to third countries by means of highly experienced veterinary epidemiology expertise.
V primeru izbruhov nekaterih bolezni živali ali suma izbruha se od Komisije zahteva, da državam članicam in tretjim državam zagotovi pomoč z visoko usposobljenimi veterinarsko epidemiološkimi izvedenskimi mnenji.
Veterinary expertise availability has also been raised in the context of the Agriculture and Fisheries Council.
Vprašanje dostopnosti izvedenskih mnenj s področja veterine je bilo obravnavano v okviru Sveta za kmetijstvo in ribištvo.
The prompt availability of sound technical expertise in the veterinary field is necessary for the Commission to be able to fulfil its tasks, notably in the event of major outbreaks of those animal diseases.
Da bi Komisija lahko izpolnjevala svoje naloge, potrebuje hiter dostop do dobrega tehničnega izvedenskega mnenja na področju veterine, predvsem v primerih velikih izbruhov navedenih bolezni živali.
Expertise and support are more efficiently provided by a specialised team of experts, such as a Community Emergency Veterinary Team, whose Members make themselves available to the Commission on request.
Specializirana skupina strokovnjakov, kot je veterinarska skupina Skupnosti za izredne dogodke, katere člani so na voljo Komisiji na njeno zahtevo, učinkoviteje zagotavlja izvedenska mnenja in podporo.
Such a team should be established and their role and tasks be defined.
Tako skupino je treba ustanoviti in opredeliti njeno vlogo in naloge.
For the Community Emergency Veterinary Team to be able to provide the Commission with the veterinary technical assistance required, its members may be sent to the Member States or third countries concerned.
Da bi bila veterinarska skupina Skupnosti za izredne dogodke sposobna zagotavljati Komisiji zahtevano veterinarsko tehnično pomoč, so lahko njeni člani napoteni v države članice ali zadevne tretje države.
In that case the members should operate in cooperation with the competent authorities of the Member State or third country concerned.
V navedenem primeru morajo člani delovati v sodelovanju s pristojnimi organi zadevne države članice ali tretje države.
The Community Emergency Veterinary Team should work, as appropriate, in close cooperation with other international expert groups, such as the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), and the World Health Organisation (WHO) in order to ensure that the available expertise are used in the most effective way,
Veterinarska skupina Skupnosti za izredne dogodke mora, kadar je primerno, delovati v tesnem sodelovanju z drugimi mednarodnimi izvedenskimi skupinami, kot so Evropski center za preprečevanje in obvladovanje bolezni (ECDC), Svetovna organizacija za zdravstveno varstvo živali (OIE), Organizacija za prehrano in kmetijstvo (FAO) in Svetovna zdravstvena organizacija (WHO), da bi zagotovila najučinkovitejši način uporabe razpoložljivih izvedenskih mnenj –
A Community Veterinary Emergency Team composed of experts is created (the team) for veterinary technical assistance on control measures relating to the diseases subject to notification listed in Annex I to Council Directive 82/894/EEC [1] (the diseases).
Vzpostavi se veterinarska skupina Skupnosti za izredne dogodke, sestavljena iz strokovnjakov („skupina“), za veterinarsko tehnično pomoč pri nadzornih ukrepih v zvezi z boleznimi, ki jih je treba prijaviti in so naštete v Prilogi I k Direktivi Sveta 82/894/EGS [1] („bolezni“).
Members of the team shall be designated from among experts in the field of veterinary epidemiology, virology, wildlife, management of eradication programmes, laboratory diagnostics, organisation of veterinary services and regulatory framework, risk communication, management and any other relevant field for animal disease control.
Za člane skupine so imenovani strokovnjaki s področij veterinarske epidemiologije, virologije, prosto živečih živali, programov upravljanja izkoreninjenja, laboratorijske diagnostike, organizacije veterinarskih služb in regulativnega okvira, sporočanja tveganja, upravljanja in katerega koli drugega ustreznega področja za nadzor bolezni živali.
The team shall assist the Commission in technical veterinary matters relating to the animal disease control measures to be taken in the event of outbreaks of the diseases or suspicion thereof.
Skupina pomaga Komisiji pri tehničnih veterinarskih zadevah v zvezi z nadzornimi ukrepi bolezni živali, ki jih je treba uporabiti v primeru izbruhov bolezni ali suma bolezni.
Such assistance shall include in particular:
Taka pomoč vsebuje zlasti: