natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Classification is determined by General Rules 1 and 6 for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature, Note 3 to Chapter 87 and by the wording of CN codes 8704, 870423 and 87042391.
Uvrstitev opredeljujejo splošni pravili 1 in 6 za razlago kombinirane nomenklature, opomba 3 k poglavju 87 ter besedilo k oznakam KN 8704, 870423 in 87042391.
A motor chassis fitted with a cabin, on which different kinds of transport construction equipment or agricultural machinery can be mounted (not forming an integral mechanical unit), cannot be classified in Chapter 84.
Šasija z motorjem, ki je opremljena s kabino za voznika in na katero je mogoče namestiti transportno gradbeno opremo ali kmetijske priključke (ki ne tvorijo celostne mehanske enote), se ne more uvrstiti v poglavje 84.
In accordance with Note 3 to Chapter 87, it is classifiable under heading 8704.
V skladu z opombo 3 k poglavju 87 se uvršča pod tarifno številko 8704.
See also the HS Explanatory Notes to headings 8432, 8704 and 8705.
Glej tudi pojasnjevalne opombe harmoniziranega sistema k tarifnim številkam 8432, 8704 in 8705.
A spreader for solid substances (working machinery) for agricultural purposes is mounted on the chassis.
Na šasijo je v kmetijske namene nameščen trosilnik za trdne snovi (delovni priključek).
The vehicle may also be driven on the public road.
Vozilo se lahko vozi tudi po javni cesti.
Classification is determined by General Rules 1 and 6 for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature and by the wording of CN codes 8705, 870590 and 87059090.
Uvrstitev opredeljujejo splošni pravili 1 in 6 za razlago kombinirane nomenklature ter besedilo k oznakam KN 8705, 870590 in 87059090.
The vehicle is not a self-propelled wheeled machine of heading 8432 because several types of working machinery can be mounted on the motor chassis.
Vozilo ni stroj na lastni pogon s kolesi pod tarifno številko 8432, ker se lahko na šasijo z motorjem namesti več vrst delovnih priključkov.
Since the motor chassis fitted with a cabin and the working machinery do not form an integral mechanical unit, the vehicle is considered to be a special purpose motor vehicle of heading 8705.
Ker šasija z motorjem s kabino za voznika in delovnimi priključki ne tvori celostne mehanske enote, se vozilo šteje k motornim vozilom za posebne namene pod tarifno oznako 8705.
See also the HS Explanatory Notes to headings 8432 and 8705.
Glej tudi pojasnjevalne opombe harmoniziranega sistema k tarifnima številkama 8432 in 8705.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 167/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 167/2007
Import licence applications for rice falling within CN code 1006 lodged from 1 September 2006 to 8 February 2007 cover a quantity of 32994 tonnes while the maximum quantity to be made available is 32000 tonnes of rice falling within the above code.
Zahtevki za uvozna dovoljenja za riž, ki spadajo pod oznako KN 1006, vloženi od 1. septembra 2006 do 8. februarja 2007, se nanašajo na količino 32994 ton, največja količina, ki se lahko uvozi pod oznako KN 1006, pa je 32000 ton riža.
A single reduction percentage, as provided for in Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 196/97, should therefore be set for the import licence applications lodged on 8 February 2007 and benefiting from the reduced customs duties provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2184/96.
Zato je treba opredeliti odstotek znižanja iz člena 4(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 196/97 za zahtevke za uvozna dovoljenja, ki so bili vloženi 8. februarja 2007 in za katere velja znižanje carine iz Uredbe (ES) št. 2184/96.
Import licence applications for rice falling within CN code 1006 and benefiting from the reduced customs duties provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2148/96, lodged on 8 February 2007 and notified to the Commission, shall give rise to the issue of licences for the quantities applied for multiplied by a reduction percentage of 80,123148 %.
Za zahtevke za uvozna dovoljenja za riž, ki spadajo pod oznako KN 1006 in za katere velja znižanje carine iz Uredbe (ES) št. 2184/96, vložene 8. februarja 2007, o čemer je obveščena Komisija, se izda dovoljenje za zahtevane količine z odstotkom znižanja za 80,123148.
Import licences under Regulation (EC) No 2148/96 shall no longer be issued in respect of licence applications for rice falling within CN code 1006 submitted on or after 9 February 2007.
Za zahtevke za uvozna dovoljenja za riž, ki spadajo pod oznako KN 1006, vložene po 9. februarju 2007, se ne izdajo več uvozna dovoljenja po Uredbi (ES) št. 2184/96.
Council Regulation (EC) No 168/2007
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 168/2007
establishing a European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights
o ustanovitvi Agencije Evropske unije za temeljne pravice
The European Union is founded on the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law, which are common values to the Member States.
Evropska unija temelji na načelih svobode, demokracije, spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter pravne države, ki so skupna vsem državam članicam.
The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union [2], bearing in mind its status and scope, and the accompanying explanations, reflects the rights as they result, in particular, from the constitutional traditions and international obligations common to the Member States, the Treaty on European Union, the Community Treaties, the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the social charters adopted by the Community and by the Council of Europe and the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities and of the European Court of Human Rights.
Upoštevajoč njen status in njeno področje uporabe ter k njej priložena pojasnila, Listina o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije [2] opredeljuje pravice, ki izhajajo zlasti iz skupnih ustavnih tradicij in skupnih mednarodnih obveznosti držav članic, iz Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, pogodb Skupnosti, Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, socialnih listin, ki sta ju sprejela Skupnost in Svet Evrope, ter iz sodne prakse Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice.
The Community and its Member States must respect fundamental rights when implementing Community law.
Pri izvajanju prava Skupnosti morajo Skupnost in njene države članice spoštovati temeljne pravice.
Greater knowledge of, and broader awareness of, fundamental rights issues in the Union are conducive to ensuring full respect of fundamental rights.
Temeljitejše poznavanje in večja osveščenost o vprašanjih s področja temeljnih pravic vodita k zagotavljanju polnega spoštovanja temeljnih pravic v Uniji.
It would contribute to the attainment of this objective to establish a Community agency whose tasks would be to provide information and data on fundamental rights matters.
Ustanovitev agencije Skupnosti, ki bi zagotavljala informacije in podatke o zadevah v zvezi s temeljnimi pravicami, bi prispevala k uresničitvi tega cilja.
Moreover, developing effective institutions for the protection and promotion of human rights is a common value of the international and European societies, as expressed by Recommendation No R (97) 14 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe of 30 September 1997.
Poleg tega je razvijanje učinkovitih institucij za varstvo in promocijo človekovih pravic skupna vrednota mednarodnih in evropskih družb, kar je bilo izraženo v Priporočilu št. R (97) 14 Odbora ministrov Sveta Evrope z dne 30. septembra 1997.
The Representatives of the Member States, meeting within the European Council on 13 December 2003, agreed to build upon the existing European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia established by Regulation (EC) No 1035/97 [3] and to extend its mandate to make it a Human Rights Agency.
Predstavniki držav članic, ki so se 13. decembra 2003 sestali v okviru Evropskega sveta, so se dogovorili, da bodo nadgradili obstoječi Evropski center za spremljanje rasizma in ksenofobije, ustanovljen z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1035/97 [3], in razširili njegov mandat tako, da bo postal Agencija za človekove pravice.
They also decided on that occasion that the seat of the Agency should remain in Vienna.
Ob tej priložnosti so se tudi odločili, da sedež Agencije ostane na Dunaju.
The Commission agreed and indicated its intention of presenting a proposal to amend Regulation (EC) No 1035/97 in that respect.
Komisija se je strinjala in navedla, da namerava v zvezi s tem predložiti predlog za spremembo Uredbe (ES) št. 1035/97.
The Commission subsequently issued its Communication of 25 October 2004 on the Fundamental Rights Agency, on the basis of which a large public consultation was carried out.
Komisija je nato objavila Sporočilo z dne 25. oktobra 2004 o Agenciji za temeljne pravice, na podlagi katerega so bila izvedena obsežna javna posvetovanja.
A European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights should accordingly be established, building upon the existing European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia, to provide the relevant institutions and authorities of the Community and its Member States when implementing Community law with information, assistance and expertise on fundamental rights in order to support them when they take measures or formulate courses of action within their respective spheres of competence to fully respect fundamental rights.
Agencija Evropske unije za temeljne pravice bi tako morala biti ustanovljena kot nadgradnja obstoječega Evropskega centra za spremljanje rasizma in ksenofobije in naj bi zadevnim institucijam in organom Skupnosti ter njenim državam članicam pri izvajanju prava Skupnosti zagotavljala informacije, pomoč in strokovno znanje o temeljnih pravicah v podporo polnemu spoštovanju temeljnih pravic pri sprejemanju ukrepov ali pri oblikovanju poteka dejavnosti v okviru njihovih pristojnosti.
It is recognised that the Agency should act only within the scope of application of Community law.
Priznano je, da bi morala Agencija delovati le v okviru področja uporabe prava Skupnosti.
The Agency should refer in its work to fundamental rights within the meaning of Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union, including the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and as reflected in particular in the Charter of Fundamental Rights, bearing in mind its status and the accompanying explanations.
Pri svojem delovanju bi se morala Agencija sklicevati na temeljne pravice v smislu člena 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, vključno z Evropsko konvencijo o človekovih pravicah in temeljnih svoboščinah, in kot so odražene predvsem v Listini o temeljnih pravicah, ob upoštevanju njenega statusa in priloženih pojasnil.
The close connection to the Charter should be reflected in the name of the Agency.
Tesna povezava z Listino bi morala biti razvidna iz imena Agencije.
As the Agency is to be built upon the existing European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia, the work of the Agency should continue to cover the phenomena of racism, xenophobia and anti-Semitism, the protection of rights of persons belonging to minorities, as well as gender equality, as essential elements for the protection of fundamental rights.
Ker bo Agencija ustanovljena kot nadgradnja Evropskega centra za spremljanje rasizma in ksenofobije, bi morala tudi v prihodnje obravnavati pojave rasizma, ksenofobije in antisemitizma, zaščito pravic pripadnikov manjšin in enakost spolov kot bistvene elemente zaščite temeljnih pravic.
The thematic areas of activity of the Agency should be laid down in the Multiannual Framework, thus defining the limits of the work of the Agency.
Tematska področja dejavnosti Agencije bi bilo treba določiti v večletnem okviru in s tem določiti meje delovnih nalog Agencije.
Due to the political significance of the Multiannual Framework, it is important that the Council itself should adopt it, after consulting the European Parliament on the basis of a Commission proposal.
Zaradi političnega pomena večletnega okvira je pomembno, da ga Svet sprejme po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom in na podlagi predloga Komisije.
The Agency should collect objective, reliable and comparable information on the development of the situation of fundamental rights, analyse this information in terms of causes of disrespect, consequences and effects and examine examples of good practice in dealing with these matters.
Agencija bi morala zbirati objektivne, zanesljive in primerljive informacije o razvoju razmer na področju temeljnih pravic, te informacije analizirati, da bi ugotovila vzroke in posledice nespoštovanja temeljnih pravic, ter preučevati primere dobre prakse za reševanje teh problemov.
The Agency should have the right to formulate opinions to the Union institutions and to the Member States when implementing Community law, either on its own initiative or at the request of the European Parliament, the Council or the Commission, without interference with the legislative and judicial procedures established in the Treaty.
Agencija bi morala imeti pri izvajanju prava Skupnosti brez poseganja v zakonodajne in sodne postopke iz Pogodbe pravico, da na lastno pobudo ali na zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta ali Komisije oblikuje mnenja za institucije Unije in države članice.
Nevertheless, the institutions should be able to request opinions on their legislative proposals or positions taken in the course of legislative procedures as far as their compatibility with fundamental rights are concerned.
Institucijam bi moralo biti kljub temu omogočeno, da zahtevajo mnenja o svojih zakonodajnih predlogih ali stališčih, sprejetih v okviru zakonodajnih postopkov, kolikor ta mnenja zadevajo skladnost teh zakonodajnih predlogov s temeljnimi pravicami.
The Agency should present an annual report on fundamental rights issues covered by the areas of the Agency's activity, also highlighting examples of good practice.
Agencija bi morala predložiti letno poročilo o vprašanjih s področja temeljnih pravic, ki sodijo v področje dejavnosti Agencije, ki bi moralo izpostaviti tudi primere dobre prakse.
Furthermore, the Agency should produce thematic reports on topics of particular importance to the Union's policies.
Poleg tega bi morala Agencija pripravljati tematska poročila o temah posebnega pomena za politike Unije.
The Agency should take measures to raise the awareness of the general public about their fundamental rights, and about possibilities and different mechanisms for enforcing them in general, without, however, dealing itself with individual complaints.
Agencija bi morala sprejeti ukrepe za povečanje osveščenosti širše javnosti o njenih temeljnih pravicah ter o možnostih in različnih mehanizmih za njihovo uveljavljanje na splošno, ne da bi se ob tem sama ukvarjala s posameznimi pritožbami.
The Agency should work as closely as possible with all relevant Union institutions as well as the bodies, offices and agencies of the Community and the Union in order to avoid duplication, in particular as regards the future European Institute for Gender Equality.
Agencija bi morala čim tesneje sodelovati z vsemi zadevnimi institucijami Unije ter organi, uradi in agencijami Skupnosti in Unije, zlasti z bodočim Evropskim inštitutom za enakost spolov, s čimer bi se izognili podvajanju.
Since cooperation with the Member States is an essential element for the successful performance of the tasks of the Agency, it should cooperate closely with the Member States through its different bodies, for the purpose of which the Member States should nominate National Liaison Officers, as primary contact points for the Agency in the Member States.
Ker je sodelovanje z državami članicami ključnega pomena za uspešno izvajanje nalog Agencije, bi morala Agencija s pomočjo svojih različnih organov tesno sodelovati z državami članicami, države članice pa bi morale v ta namen imenovati nacionalne uradnike za zvezo, ki bodo glavne kontaktne točke Agencije v državah članicah.
The Agency should, in particular, communicate with the National Liaison Officers as regards reports and other documents drawn up by the Agency.
Predvsem mora Agencija komunicirati z nacionalnimi uradniki za zvezo glede poročil in drugih dokumentov, ki jih pripravi.
The Agency should collaborate closely with the Council of Europe.
Agencija bi morala tesno sodelovati s Svetom Evrope.
Such cooperation should guarantee that any overlap between the activities of the Agency and those of the Council of Europe is avoided, in particular by elaborating mechanisms to ensure complementarity and added value, such as the conclusion of a bilateral cooperation agreement and the participation of an independent person appointed by the Council of Europe in the management structures of the Agency with appropriately defined voting rights.
S takšnim sodelovanjem bi se izognili prekrivanju med dejavnostmi Agencije in dejavnostmi Sveta Evrope, zlasti z oblikovanjem mehanizmov za zagotavljanje dopolnjevanja in dodane vrednosti, kakršni sta sklenitev dvostranskega sporazuma o sodelovanju in sodelovanje neodvisne osebe, ki bi jo v upravno strukturo Agencije imenoval Svet Evrope in bi imela ustrezno določene glasovalne pravice.
Recognising the important role of civil society in the protection of fundamental rights, the Agency should promote dialogue with civil society and work closely with non-governmental organisations and with institutions of civil society active in the field of fundamental rights.
Ob priznavanju pomembne vloge civilne družbe pri varstvu temeljnih pravic bi morala Agencija spodbujati dialog s civilno družbo in tesno sodelovati z nevladnimi organizacijami in institucijami civilne družbe, dejavnimi na področju temeljnih pravic.
It should set up a cooperation network called the ‘Fundamental Rights Platform’ with a view to creating a structured and fruitful dialogue and close cooperation with all relevant stakeholders.
Agencija bi morala vzpostaviti mrežo sodelovanja, imenovano „platforma za temeljne pravice“, da bi ustvarili strukturiran in ploden dialog ter tesno sodelovanje z vsemi zadevnimi interesnimi skupinami.
Given the particular functions of the Agency, each Member State should appoint one independent expert to the Management Board.
Glede na posebne naloge Agencije bi morala vsaka država članica v upravni odbor imenovati po enega neodvisnega strokovnjaka.
Having regard to the principles relating to the status and functioning of national institutions for the protection and promotion of human rights (the Paris Principles), the composition of that Board should ensure the Agency's independence from both Community institutions and Member State governments and assemble the broadest possible expertise in the field of fundamental rights.
Ob upoštevanju načel glede statusa in delovanja nacionalnih institucij za varstvo in promocijo človekovih pravic („Pariška načela“) bi morala sestava upravnega odbora zagotavljati neodvisnost Agencije od institucij Skupnosti in vlad držav članic ter v kar največjem možnem obsegu združevati strokovno znanje s področja temeljnih pravic.
In order to ensure the high scientific quality of the work of the Agency, the Agency should avail itself of a Scientific Committee in order to guide its work by means of scientific objectivity.
Da se zagotovi visoka znanstvena kakovost dela Agencije, bi moral v okviru Agencije delovati znanstveni odbor, ki bi z znanstveno objektivnostjo usmerjal njeno dejavnost.
The authorities appointing members of the Management Board, the Executive Board and the Scientific Committee should aim to achieve a balanced participation between women and men on these bodies.
Organi, ki imenujejo člane upravnega odbora, izvršilnega odbora in znanstvenega odbora, bi si morali prizadevati doseči uravnoteženo zastopanost žensk in moških v teh organih.
Particular attention should also be given to the balanced representation of women and men on the staff of the Agency.
Posebno pozornost bi bilo treba posvetiti tudi uravnoteženi udeležbi žensk in moških v osebju Agencije.
Considering the significant role played by the European Parliament in the defence, mainstreaming and promotion of fundamental rights, it should be involved in the activities of the Agency, including the adoption of the Multiannual Framework for the Agency, and, given the exceptional nature and task of the Agency, the selection of the candidates proposed for the post of the Director of the Agency without setting a precedent for other Agencies.
Glede na pomembno vlogo, ki jo Evropski parlament igra pri varstvu, vključevanju temeljnih pravic v vse politike in njihovi promociji, bi bilo Evropski parlament treba vključiti v dejavnosti Agencije, vključno v sprejemanje večletnega okvira za Agencijo – ter glede na izredno naravo in naloge Agencije – v izbiro kandidatov, ki so predlagani za direktorja Agencije, ne da bi to pomenilo precedens za druge agencije.
The Agency should apply the relevant Community legislation concerning public access to documents as set out in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents [4], the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data as set out in Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [5], and concerning languages as set out in Regulation No 1 of 15 April 1958 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community [6] and Regulation (EC) No 2965/94 of 28 November 1994 setting up a Translation Centre for bodies of the European Union [7].
Agencija bi morala uporabljati ustrezno zakonodajo Skupnosti o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov, kakor je določen v Uredbi (ES) št. 1049/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 30. maja 2001 [4] o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov, kakor je določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 [5] o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov, in o jezikih, kakor so določeni v Uredbi št. 1 z dne 15. aprila 1958 o določitvi jezikov, ki se uporabljajo v Evropski gospodarski skupnosti [6], in v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 2965/94 z dne 28. novembra 1994 o ustanovitvi Prevajalskega centra za organe Evropske unije [7].
Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 23 December 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [8] should apply to the Agency, as well as Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Antifraud Office (OLAF) [9].
Za Agencijo bi bilo treba uporabljati Uredbo Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 z dne 23. decembra 2002 o okvirni finančni uredbi za organe iz člena 185 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [8] ter Uredbo (ES) št. 1073/1999 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. maja 1999 o preiskavah, ki jih izvaja Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) [9].
The Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities, the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the European Communities and the rules adopted jointly by the European Community institutions for the purpose of applying these Staff Regulations and Conditions of Employment should apply to the staff and to the Director of the Agency, including their rules relating to the dismissal of the Director.
Za osebje in direktorja Agencije bi se morali uporabljati Kadrovski predpisi za uradnike Evropskih skupnosti, Pogoji za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev v Evropskih skupnostih in pravila, ki jih skupaj sprejmejo institucije Evropskih skupnosti za izvajanje teh kadrovskih predpisov in pogojev za zaposlitev, vključno s pravili za razrešitev direktorja.