natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Has your Member State established a monitoring programme on the presence of dioxins, furans and PCBs in the environment?
Ali je vaša država članica vzpostavila program za spremljanje in nadzor prisotnosti dioksinov, furanov in PCB v okolju?
If the answer to question 1 is ‘Yes’, please specify the name of the substance(s) for which you have monitoring data.
Če je odgovor na vprašanje 1 „da“, navedite imena snovi, za katere imate podatke o spremljanju in nadzoru.
For each specified substance and each monitoring programme, specify the period and objectives of the monitoring programme, the type of sampling point (e.g., hot spots, accidents, background situation), the geographical location, the analytical method applied, the compartments in which the substance was sampled, the values found (mean, median, maximum, minimum, number of samples) and how to access these data.
Za vsako navedeno snov in vsak program spremljanja in nadzora navedite obdobje in cilje programa za spremljanje in nadzor, vrsto vzorčevalnih mest (npr. vroče točke, nesreče, vrednost ozadja), geografski položaj, uporabljeno analitsko metodo, del okolja, kjer je bila snov vzorčena, ugotovljene vrednosti (povprečna, srednja, največja, najnižja, število vzorcev) in kako priti do teh podatkov.
Section VI: Information exchange
Oddelek VI: Izmenjava informacij
Has your Member State established an information exchange mechanism?
Ali je vaša država članica vzpostavila mehanizem za izmenjavo informacij?
If the answer to question 1 is ‘Yes’ and if the information exchange mechanism is not part of your NIP, please describe it.
Če je odgovor na vprašanje 1 „da“ in če mehanizem za izmenjavo informacij ni sestavni del vašega nacionalnega izvedbenega načrta, ga opišite.
Has your Member State taken any measure to promote and facilitate awareness programmes with regard to persistent organic pollutants?
Ali je vaša država članica že sprejela kakršne koli ukrepe za spodbujanje in krepitev programov ozaveščanja o obstojnih organskih onesnaževalih?
If the answer to question 2 is ‘No’, please explain why.
Če je odgovor na vprašanje 2 „ne“, navedite razloge.
If the answer to question 2 is ‘Yes’, please describe the measures taken.
Če je odgovor na vprašanje 2 „da“, opišite sprejete ukrepe.
If the answer to question 3 is ‘No’, please explain why.
Če je odgovor na vprašanje 3 „ne“, navedite razloge.
If the answer to question 3 is ‘Yes’, please describe the measures taken.
Če je odgovor na vprašanje 3 „da“, opišite sprejete ukrepe.
Has your Member State taken any measure to promote and facilitate the training of workers, scientists, educators and technical and managerial personnel with regard to persistent organic pollutants?
Ali je vaša država članica že sprejela kakršne koli ukrepe za spodbujanje in krepitev usposabljanja delavcev, znanstvenikov, vzgojiteljev ter tehničnega in vodilnega osebja o obstojnih organskih onesnaževalih?
If the answer to question 4 is ‘No’, please explain why.
Če je odgovor na vprašanje 4 „ne“, navedite razloge.
If the answer to question 4 is ‘Yes’, please describe the measures taken.
Če je odgovor na vprašanje 4 „da“, opišite sprejete ukrepe.
Section VII: Technical assistance
Oddelek VII: Tehnična pomoč
Has your Member State provided to other country(ies) technical and financial assistance to develop and strengthen their capacity to fully implement their obligation under the Stockholm Convention on persistent organic pollutants?
Ali je vaša država članica zagotovila drugim državam tehnično in finančno pomoč za razvoj in krepitev njihove sposobnosti za polno izpolnjevanje njihovih obveznosti glede obstojnih organskih onesnaževal po Stockholmski konvenciji?
If the answer to question 1 is ‘Yes’, please specify the country/ies and kind of assistance.
Če je odgovor na vprašanje 1 „da“, navedite države in vrsto pomoči.
Section VIII: Penalties
Oddelek VIII: Kazni
How does your Member State lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 850/2004?
Kako vaša država članica določa predpise o kaznih, ki se uporabljajo za kršitve določb Uredbe (ES) št. 850/2004?
What are the measures taken to ensure the implementation of the rules on penalties?
Kateri ukrepi so bili sprejeti, da se zagotovi izvajanje predpisov o kaznih?
Infringement procedure
Postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev
Has your Member State initiated an infringement procedure for breach of Regulation (EC) No 850/2004?
Ali je vaša država članica sprožila postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev v zvezi s kršitvijo določb Uredbe (ES) št. 850/2004?
If the answer to question 2.1 is ‘Yes’, please specify the Article of that to which the infringement relates, describe briefly the infringement and indicate the penalty set for the offender.
Če je odgovor na vprašanje 2.1 „da“, navedite člen Uredbe, ki je bil kršen, na kratko opišite kršitev in navedite kazen, določeno za kršitelja.
World Health Organization Toxic Equivalency Factors for polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans and coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls.
Faktorji toksične ekvivalence Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije za poliklorirane dibenzo-p-dioksine in dibenzofurane ter koplanarne poliklorirane bifenile.
Has your Member State taken any measure to promote and facilitate the provision of public information with regards to persistent organic pollutants? (Yes/No)
Ali je vaša država članica že sprejela kakršne koli ukrepe za spodbujanje in krepitev zagotavljanja informacij za javnost o obstojnih organskih onesnaževalih?
establishing, in accordance with Article 104(8), that the action taken by the Czech Republic in response to the Recommendation of the Council in accordance with Article 104(7) of the Treaty establishing the European Community is proving to be inadequate
o ugotovitvi, v skladu s členom 104(8), da so se ukrepi, ki jih je sprejela Češka republika kot odgovor na priporočilo Sveta v skladu s členom 104(7) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, izkazali za nezadostne
Having regard to the Recommendation from the Commission,
ob upoštevanju priporočila Komisije,
According to Article 104 of the Treaty, Member States are to avoid excessive government deficits.
Člen 104 Pogodbe določa, da se morajo države članice izogibati čezmernemu javnofinančnemu primanjkljaju.
The Stability and Growth Pact is based on the objective of sound government finances as a means of strengthening the conditions for price stability and for strong sustainable growth conducive to employment creation.
Pakt stabilnosti in rasti temelji na cilju zdravih javnih financ kot sredstvu za izboljšanje pogojev za stabilnost cen in za močno trajnostno rast, ki prispeva k ustvarjanju delovnih mest.
The Stability and Growth Pact includes Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 of 7 July 1997 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure [1] which was adopted to further the prompt correction of excessive general government deficits.
Pakt stabilnosti in rasti vključuje Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1467/97 dne 7. julija 1997 o pospešitvi in razjasnitvi izvajanja postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem [1], ki je bila sprejeta, da pospeši takojšnje zmanjšanje čezmernega splošnega javnofinančnega primanjkljaja.
By Council Decision 2005/185/EC [2], it was decided, following a recommendation from the Commission in accordance with Article 104(6) of the Treaty, that an excessive deficit existed in the Czech Republic.
Z Odločbo Sveta 2005/185/ES [2] je bilo po priporočilu Komisije v skladu s členom 104(6) Pogodbe odločeno, da v Češki republiki obstaja čezmerni primanjkljaj.
On 5 July 2004, in accordance with Article 104(7) of the Treaty and Article 3(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97, the Council, based on a recommendation from the Commission, adopted a recommendation to the Czech authorities with a view to bringing the excessive deficit situation to an end as rapidly as possible and to taking action in a medium-term framework to achieve the objective of bringing the deficit below 3 % of GDP by 2008 in a credible and sustainable manner, in accordance with the path for deficit reduction specified in the convergence programme submitted by the authorities in May 2004 and endorsed in the Council Opinion of 5 July 2004 on the Convergence Programme of the Czech Republic, 2004-2007 [3], with the following intermediate annual targets: 5,3 % of GDP in 2004, 4,7 % of GDP in 2005, 3,8 % of GDP in 2006, 3,3 % of GDP in 2007.
Dne 5. julija 2004 je Svet v skladu s členom 104(7) Pogodbe in členom 3(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1467/97 na podlagi priporočila Komisije sprejel priporočilo za češke organe, da čimprej končajo stanje čezmernega primanjkljaja in da v okviru srednjeročnega obdobja ukrepajo na verodostojen in trajnosten način z namenom doseči cilj zmanjšanja primanjkljaja pod 3 % BDP v letu 2008, v skladu s potjo za zmanjšanje primanjkljaja, kakor je določeno v konvergenčnem programu, ki so ga organi predložili maja 2004 in ga je Svet potrdil v Mnenju Sveta z dne 5. julija 2004 o konvergenčnem programu za Češko republiko 2004–2007 [3], z naslednjimi vmesnimi letnimi cilji: 5,3 % BDP v letu 2004, 4,7 % BDP v letu 2005, 3,8 % BDP v letu 2006 in 3,3 % BDP v letu 2007.
The Council established the deadline of 5 November 2004 to take effective action ‘regarding the measures envisaged to achieve the 2005 deficit target’.
Svet je kot rok za sprejetje učinkovitih ukrepov „ki so bili predvideni za dosego ciljnega primanjkljaja za leto 2005,“ določil 5. november 2004.
The Czech Republic agreed to make the recommendation public.
Češka republika se je strinjala, da priporočila objavi.
After the expiry of the deadline of 5 November 2004, the Commission concluded, in its Communication to the Council of 14 December 2004 [4], that no further steps were necessary under the excessive deficit procedure for the Czech Republic as the Czech government had taken effective action regarding the measures envisaged to achieve the 2005 deficit target.
Po izteku roka 5. novembra 2004 je Komisija v svojem sporočilu Svetu z dne 14. decembra 2004 [4] sklenila, da niso potrebni nadaljnji ukrepi v okviru postopka za čezmerni primanjkljaj za Češko republiko, saj je češka vlada učinkovito ukrepala v zvezi z ukrepi, predvidenimi za dosego ciljnega primanjkljaja za leto 2005.
The November 2005 update of the convergence programme indicated a deficit of 2,7 % of GDP for 2008 which was endorsed by the Council on 24 January 2006.
Dopolnitev konvergenčnega programa iz novembra 2005 je navedla primanjkljaj v višini 2,7 % BDP za leto 2008, ki ga 24. januarja 2006 potrdil Svet.
The assessment of the action taken by the Czech Republic to correct the excessive deficit by 2008 in response to the Council recommendation under Article 104(7) leads to the following conclusions:
Ocena ukrepov, ki jih je sprejela Češka republika za zmanjšanje čezmernega primanjkljaja do leta 2008 kot odgovor na priporočilo Sveta na podlagi člena 104(7), vodi do naslednjih sklepov:
on 15 March 2007, the Czech Republic submitted the most recent update of the convergence programme, covering the period until 2009.
Češka republika je 15. marca 2007 predložila najnovejšo dopolnitev konvergenčnega programa za obdobje do leta 2009.
The programme contained the following annual deficit projections: 4,0 % of GDP for 2007, 3,5 % of GDP for 2008 and 3,2 % of GDP for 2009.
Program je vključeval naslednje letne projekcije primanjkljaja: 4 % BDP za leto 2007, 3,5 % BDP za leto 2008 in 3,2 % BDP za leto 2009.
The programme also included an additional ‘declaration of the new government’ aiming to reduce the general deficit to 3,2 % of GDP in 2008 and 2,8 % of GDP in 2009 based on a wide range of as yet unknown policy measures,
Program je tudi vseboval dodatno „izjavo nove vlade“ za zmanjšanje javnofinančnega primanjkljaja na 3,2 % BDP v letu 2008 in 2,8 % BDP v letu 2009, ki temelji na širokem spektru še neznanih ukrepov politike.
the Commission services’ spring 2007 forecast, which projects that the deficit will reach 3,9 % of GDP and 3,6 % of GDP in 2007 and 2008 respectively on a no-policy change basis, confirms that, on current policies, the targets set in the Council recommendation under Article 104(7) for 2007 (3,3 % of GDP) and 2008 (below 3 % of GDP) will be missed. In structural terms (i.e. in cyclically-adjusted terms net of one-off and other temporary measures), the deficit would widen by 11 4
Napoved služb Komisije iz pomladi 2007, ki predvideva, da bo primanjkljaj dosegel 3,9 % BDP in v letu 2007 in 3,6 % BDP v letu 2008 na podlagi nespremenjenih politik, potrjuje, da ob trenutnih politikah, cilji, določeni v priporočilu Sveta v skladu s členom 104(7) za leto 2007 (3,3 % BDP) in za leto 2008 (pod 3 % BDP), ne bodo doseženi.
percentage points of GDP in 2007, after deteriorations in both 2005 and 2006,
V strukturnem smislu (tj. glede na ciklično prilagojeni proračunski saldo brez enkratnih in drugih začasnih ukrepov) naj bi se po zmanjšanjih v letih 2005 in 2006 primanjkljaj v letu 2007 povečal za 1,25 % odstotne točke BDP.
the higher 2007 deficit comes against much stronger growth than forecast at the time of the Council recommendation and is mainly due to increases in social spending decided before the 2006 parliamentary elections.
Višji primanjkljaj v letu 2007 temelji na veliko močnejši rasti, kot je bila predvidena v času priporočila Sveta, in je nastal zlasti zaradi povišanj socialnih stroškov, sklenjenih pred parlamentarnimi volitvami leta 2006.
The higher 2007 deficit is projected to occur against the background of much lower deficits in the preceding years than foreseen in the Council recommendation.
Za leto 2007 se pričakuje višji primanjkljaj glede na primanjkljaje v prejšnjih letih, ki so bili veliko nižji od predvidenih v priporočilu Sveta.
This was due mainly to better than expected growth rather than durable cuts in expenditure.
To se je zgodilo zlasti zaradi rasti, ki je bila boljša od pričakovane, in ne toliko zaradi trajnega znižanja odhodkov.
This leads to the conclusion that, while the Czech Republic has so far overachieved the budgetary targets for 2004-2006 of the consolidation path set in the Council recommendation of 5 July 2004, the 2007 deficit will be well above the target set by the Council and the 2008 deficit will on current policies clearly exceed the 3 % of GDP threshold.
Iz tega se lahko sklepa, da medtem ko je Češka republika do zdaj v veliki meri dosegala proračunske cilje poteka konsolidacije za obdobje 2004–2006, določene s priporočilom Sveta z dne 5. julija 2004, bo leta 2007 primanjkljaj precej nad ciljem, ki ga je določil Svet, leta 2008 bo primanjkljaj ob trenutnih politikah vidno presegel prag v višini 3 % BDP.
The Czech authorities’ budgetary targets are not in line with the recommendations of the Council for a correction of the excessive deficit by the 2008 deadline.
Proračunski cilji čeških organov niso skladni s priporočili Sveta za zmanjšanje čezmernega primanjkljaja do leta 2008.
No unexpected adverse economic events with major unfavourable consequences for government finances as meant in Article 3(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 have occurred since the adoption of the recommendation.
Od sprejetja priporočila ni bilo nepričakovanih škodljivih gospodarskih dogodkov s hujšimi neugodnimi posledicami za javne finance, kot je mišljeno v členu 3(5) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1467/97.
On the contrary, developments in the economy relevant for public finances have been significantly more favourable than expected,
Nasprotno, razvoj v gospodarstvu, ki je pomemben za javne finance, je bolj ugoden od pričakovanega.
The action taken by the Czech Republic in response to the Council Recommendation of 5 July 2004 under Article 104(7) of the Treaty is proving to be inadequate to correct the excessive deficit within the deadline fixed by the Recommendation.
Ukrepi, ki jih je sprejela Češka republika kot odgovor na priporočilo z dne 5. julija 2004 na podlagi člena 104(7) Pogodbe, so se izkazali za nezadostne za zmanjšanje čezmernega primanjkljaja do roka, določenega s priporočilom.
OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 20.
UL L 62, 9.3.2005, str. 20.
OJ C 320, 24.12.2004, p. 1.
UL C 320, 24.12.2004, str. 1.
Communication from the Commission to the Council: The action taken by the Czech Republic, Cyprus, Malta, Poland and Slovakia in response to the Council recommendations under the excessive deficit procedure — SEC(2004) 1630, 22.12.2004.
Sporočilo Komisije Svetu: Ukrepi Češke republike, Cipra, Malte, Poljske in Slovaške kot odgovor na priporočila Sveta v zvezi s postopkom čezmernega primanjkljaja, SEC(2004) 1630, 22.12.2004.
of 1 October 2007
z dne 1. oktobra 2007
on the conclusion of consultations with the Republic of the Fiji Islands under Article 96 of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement and Article 37 of the Development Cooperation Instrument
o zaključku posvetovanj z Republiko Fidži na podlagi člena 96 Sporazuma o partnerstvu AKP-ES in člena 37 Instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje
Having regard to the Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000 [1] as revised in Luxembourg on 25 June 2005 [2] (hereinafter referred to as ‘the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement’), and in particular Article 96 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o partnerstvu med članicami skupine afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi, podpisan v Cotonouju dne 23. junija 2000 [1], kakor je bil revidiran v Luxembourgu, dne 25. junija 2005 [2] (v nadaljevanju „Sporazum o partnerstvu AKP-ES“), in zlasti člena 96 Sporazuma,
Having regard to the Internal Agreement between the representatives of the governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on measures to be taken and procedures to be followed for the implementation of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement [3], and in particular Article 3 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Notranjega sporazuma predstavnikov vlad držav članic, ki so se sestali na Svetu, o ukrepih in postopkih, ki jih je treba sprejeti in upoštevati pri izvajanju Sporazum o partnerstvu AKP-ES [3], in zlasti člena 3 Sporazuma,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation [4] (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Development Cooperation Instrument’), and in particular Article 37 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1905/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja [4] (v nadaljevanju „Instrument za razvojno sodelovanje“) in zlasti člena 37 Instrumenta,
The essential elements referred to in Article 9 of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement have been violated.
Kršeni so bili bistveni elementi iz člena 9 Sporazuma o partnerstvu AKP-ES.
The values referred to in Article 3 of the Development Cooperation Instrument have been violated.
Kršene so bile vrednote iz člena 3 Instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje.
On 18 April 2007, pursuant to Article 96 of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement and Article 37 of the Development Cooperation Instrument, formal consultations began with the ACP countries and the Republic of the Fiji Islands during which the Fijian authorities gave specific commitments to remedy the problems identified by the European Union and to implement them.
V skladu s členom 96 Sporazuma o partnerstvu AKP-ES in člena 37 Instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje so se 18. aprila 2007 začela uradna posvetovanja z državami AKP in Republiko Fidži, med katerimi so fidžijski organi podali posebne zaveze za odpravo težav, ki jih je ugotovila Evropska unija, ter za uresničitev teh zavez.
Some substantive initiatives have been taken in respect of some of the commitments referred to above; nevertheless many important commitments concerning essential elements of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement and the Development Cooperation Instrument have yet to be implemented,
V zvezi z nekaterimi zgornjimi zavezami so bile začete pomembne pobude; vendar pa številne pomembne zaveze glede bistvenih elementov Sporazuma o partnerstvu AKP-ES in Instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje še niso izvedene –
Consultations with the Republic of the Fiji Islands under Article 96 of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement and Article 37 of the Development Cooperation Instrument are hereby concluded.
Posvetovanja z Republiko Fidži na podlagi člena 96 Sporazum o partnerstvu AKP-ES in člena 37 Instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje se zaključijo.
The appropriate measures set out in the annexed letter are hereby adopted as appropriate measures under Article 96(2)(c) of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement and Article 37 of the Development Cooperation Instrument.
Ustrezni ukrepi, določeni v pismu iz Priloge, se sprejmejo kot ustrezni ukrepi v okviru člena 96(2)(c) Sporazuma o partnerstvu AKP-ES in člena 37 Instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje.
It shall expire on 1 October 2009.
Veljati preneha 1. oktobra 2009.
It shall be reviewed regularly at least once every six months.
Redno se pregleda vsaj vsakih šest mesecev.
Done at Luxembourg, 1 October 2007.
V Luxembourgu, 1. oktobra 2007
Ratu Josefa ILOILO
Njegova ekscelenca Ratu Josefa ILOILO
President of the Republic of the Fiji Islands
Predsednik Republike Fidži
Excellency,
Vaša ekscelenca,
The European Union attaches great importance to the provisions of Article 9 of the Cotonou Agreement and Article 3 of the Development Cooperation Instrument.
Evropska unija pripisuje velik pomen členu 9 Sporazuma iz Cotonouja in členu 3 Instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje.
The ACP-EC partnership is founded on respect for human rights, democratic principles and the rule of law, which form the essential elements of the Cotonou Agreement, and form the basis of our relations.
Partnerstvo AKP-ES temelji na spoštovanju človekovih pravic, demokratičnih načel in načel pravne države, ki so bistveni elementi Sporazuma iz Cotounuja in so temelj naših medsebojnih odnosov.
On 11 December 2006 the Council of the European Union condemned the military takeover in Fiji.
Svet Evropske unije je 11. decembra 2006 obsodil vojaški prevzem oblasti na Fidžiju.
Under Article 96 of the Cotonou Agreement, and considering that the military takeover which took place on 5 December 2006 constituted a violation of the essential elements listed in Article 9 of that Agreement, the EU invited Fiji to consultations in order, as provided for in the Agreement, to thoroughly examine the situation and, where necessary, take steps to remedy it.
Na podlagi člena 96 Sporazuma iz Cotonouja in ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je vojaški prevzem oblasti, ki se je zgodil 5. decembra 2006, pomenil kršitev bistvenih elementov iz člena 9 Sporazuma, je EU povabila Fidži k posvetovanjem, da bi, kot določa Sporazum, temeljito proučila položaj in, če bi se izkazalo za potrebno, sprejela ukrepe za njegovo izboljšanje.
The formal part of those consultations began in Brussels on 18 April 2007.
Uradni del teh posvetovanj se je začel 18. aprila 2007 v Bruslju.
The Interim Government of Fiji made a presentation based on a submission dated 18 April 2007 on the reasons for the military takeover of 5 December 2006, on developments in the country’s situation since the takeover, and on the Interim Government’s programme for the transitional period.
Začasna vlada Fidžija je pripravila predstavitev na osnovi predloga z dne 18. aprila 2007 o razlogih za vojaški prevzem oblasti dne 5. decembra 2006, o razvoju razmer v državi od tega prevzema oblasti in o programu začasne vlade za prehodno obdobje.
The EU took note of the Interim Government’s submission of 18 April 2007 to the EU.
EU se je seznanila s predlogom začasne vlade z dne 18. aprila 2007.