natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Indeed, the investigation showed that most of the injury indicators pertaining to the Community industry, in particular, production, production capacity, sales volume, market share and profitability, deteriorated sharply between 2004 and the IP, namely at the time when the volumes of dumped imports increased most significantly.
Dejansko je preiskava pokazala, da se je večina kazalnikov škode v zvezi z industrijo Skupnosti, zlasti proizvodnja, proizvodna zmogljivost, obseg prodaje, tržni delež in dobičkonosnost, močno poslabšala med letom 2004 in OP, ko se je obseg dampinškega uvoza najbolj povečal.
This is particularly true for the production which decreased by 6 %, the sales volume which decreased by 11 %, the market share which declined by 1,9 percentage points and profitability which declined by 5,7 percentage points between 2004 and the IP.
To velja zlasti za proizvodnjo, ki se je zmanjšala za 6 %, obseg prodaje, ki se je zmanjšal za 11 %, tržni delež, ki se je zmanjšal za 1,9 odstotne točke in dobičkonosnost, ki se je zmanjšala za 5,7 odstotnih točk med letom 2004 in OP.
Moreover, this occurred at a time where dumped imports were significantly undercutting Community industry prices by over 40 %.
Poleg tega se je to zgodilo v obdobju, ko je dampinški uvoz bistveno nelojalno nižal cene industrije Skupnosti za več kot 40 %.
The effect of this unfair pricing behaviour was that the Community industry's prices were suppressed and could not even cover the increase in raw material prices.
To nepošteno oblikovanje cen je preprečilo dvig cen industrije Skupnosti, ki niso zmogle pokriti niti zvišanja cen surovin.
This was further confirmed by the significant losses incurred by the Community industry during the IP.
To se je potrdilo tudi z bistvenimi izgubami, ki jih je imela industrija Skupnosti v OP.
Based on the above facts and considerations, it is evident that the surge in low-priced dumped imports from the countries concerned coincided with the injurious situation of the Community industry.
Iz zgornjih dejstev in razprav je jasno razvidno, da je povečanje nizkocenovnega dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav časovno sovpadlo s stanjem škode industrije Skupnosti.
The negative impact of the dumped imports was particularly pronounced from 2004 up to the IP and had a determining role in the deterioration of the economic situation of the Community industry.
Negativni vpliv dampinškega uvoza je bil izrazit zlasti od leta 2004 do OP in je imel odločilno vlogo pri poslabšanju gospodarskih razmer industrije Skupnosti.
Between 2002 and the IP, the Community consumption increased by more than 3 %.
Med letom 2002 in obdobjem preiskave se je potrošnja Skupnosti povečala za več kot 3 %.
The development of consumption thus has not contributed to the injury suffered by the Community industry.
Razvoj potrošnje tako ni pripomogel k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
To the contrary, under normal market conditions, the Community industry could have expected an increase in its sales volumes.
Nasprotno, v normalnih tržnih razmerah bi lahko industrija Skupnosti pričakovala povečanje obsega svoje prodaje.
Imports from other third countries
Uvozi iz drugih tretjih držav
The imports from third countries not concerned by this investigation showed the following development during the period considered:
Razvoj uvoza iz tretjih držav, ki jih ta preiskava ne zadeva, je v obravnavanem obdobju potekal na naslednji način:
Imports from other countries subject to anti-dumping duties
Uvoz iz drugih držav, za katere veljajo protidampinške dajatve
Table 11
Preglednica 11:
Import volume in tonnes
Obseg uvoza v tonah
0Belarus
0Belorusija
Table 12
Preglednica 12:
Market share of other countries subject to anti-dumping duties
Tržni delež drugih držav, za katere veljajo protidampinške dajatve
As shown in the table above, market share of the countries subject to anti-dumping duties remained stable between 2002 and the IP.
Iz zgornje preglednice je razvidno, da je tržni delež držav, za katere veljajo protidampinške dajatve, ostal nespremenjen med letom 2002 in OP.
They first gained 4 percentage points between 2002 and 2004 and then fall back to the 2002 level.
Najprej so v obdobju 2002–2004 pridobile 4 odstotne točke, nato pa ponovno padle na raven iz leta 2002.
Imports from all countries subject to anti-dumping measures decreased between 2004 and the IP i.e. by 18 % in volume and 4 percentage points in market share.
Uvoz iz vseh držav, za katere veljajo protidampinški ukrepi, se je zmanjšal med letom 2004 in OP, in sicer se je obseg uvoza zmanjšal za 18 %, njegov tržni delež pa za 4 odstotne točke.
In the light of the above, it is provisionally concluded that imports form third countries subject to anti-dumping measures did not have an appreciable effect on the injury of the Community industry.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega se začasno sklene, da uvoz iz tretjih držav, za katere veljajo protidampinški ukrepi, ni občutno vplival na škodo industrije Skupnosti.
Imports from other third countries not subject to anti-dumping duties
Uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav, za katere ne veljajo protidampinške dajatve
Table 13
Preglednica 13:
Unit prices (Euro/mt)
Cene na enoto (EUR/milijonov ton)
Of which Nigeria
od tega Nigerija
prices (Euro/mt)
Cene (EUR/milijonov ton)
Of which Turkey
od tega Turčija
Imports from other third countries not subject to anti-dumping duties slightly decreased between 2002 and 2003 and then increased by 45 % between 2003 and the IP.
Uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav, za katere ne veljajo protidampinške dajatve, se je nekoliko zmanjšal med letoma 2002 in 2003 in nato povečal za 45 % med letom 2003 in OP.
Although their prices decreased by 7 % between 2002 and the IP they remained however 9 % higher than the prices of the countries concerned in the IP.
Čeprav so se cene tega uvoza znižale za 7 % med letom 2002 in OP, so ostale 9 % višje kot cene zadevnih držav v OP.
Only two countries had market share equal or above 2 % i.e. Turkey and Nigeria
Tržni delež samo dveh držav, tj. Turčije in Nigerije, je znašal 2 % ali več.
However, it should be noted that their prices were increasing respectively by 8 % and 15 % between 2002 and the IP and even more significantly between 2004 and the IP respectively by 13 % and 22 % while prices from the countries concerned increased by only 10 % during the same period.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da so se njune cene povečale za 8 % in 15 % med letom 2002 in OP ter še bolj med letom 2004 in OP, in sicer za 13 % in 22 %, medtem ko so se cene uvoza iz zadevnih držav v istem obdobju povečale za samo 10 %.
In addition, their prices were on average 4 % higher than the prices charged by Taiwanese and Malaysian exporters during the IP.
Poleg tega so bile njune cene v povprečju 4 % višje kot cene, ki so jih zaračunali tajvanski in malezijski izvozniki v OP.
Although the volume of Turkish and Nigerian PSF significantly increased between 2002 and the IP, they respectively amount to only 10,1 % and 2,7 % of the imports into the Community and only Turkey gained a small market share between 2002 and the IP i.e. 3 percentage points.
Čeprav se je obseg RVP iz Turčije in Nigerije bistveno povečal med letom 2002 in OP, ti dve državi predstavljata samo 10,1 % in 2,7 % uvoza v Skupnost, samo Turčija pa je med letom 2002 in OP pridobila majhen tržni delež, tj. 3 odstotne točke.
Thus, Nigerian imports could not have contributed to the injury suffered by the Community industry.
Zato uvoz iz Nigerije ni mogel prispevati k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
Regarding Turkey, it should be mentioned that most of the imports of PSF into the Community are made by one of the complainant companies included in the definition of the Community industry, which is related to a Turkish exporting producer.
Glede Turčije je treba omeniti, da je večino RVP v Skupnost uvozila ena od družb pritožnic, ki je zajeta v opredelitev industrije Skupnosti in je povezana s turškim proizvajalcem izvoznikom.
These purchases aimed at supplementing the product range of the Community producer in question in periods of intensive market demand.
Namen teh nakupov je bil dopolniti niz izdelkov zadevnega proizvajalca Skupnosti v obdobjih intenzivnega tržnega povpraševanja.
Furthermore, these imports were not caused by any abandoned or delayed investment projects susceptible of having provoked a reduction in the production capacity of the Community related company.
Nadalje, tega uvoza niso povzročili opusteli ali zastali investicijski projekti, ki bi lahko povzročili zmanjšanje proizvodne zmogljivosti povezane družbe Skupnosti.
It was therefore concluded that the Turkish products completed the product range of the Community industry enabling it to offer a wider choice of models to customers and that they did not affect negatively the situation of the Community industry.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da so turški izdelki dopolnili niz izdelkov industrije Skupnosti in ji omogočili, da strankam ponudi širšo izbiro modelov, niso pa negativno vplivali na razmere industrije Skupnosti.
In the light of the above, it is provisionally concluded that imports form third countries without anti-dumping measures did not have an appreciable effect on the injury of the Community industry.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega se začasno sklene, da uvoz iz tretjih držav, za katere ne veljajo protidampinški ukrepi, ni občutno vplival na škodo industrije Skupnosti.
The other Community producers of the product concerned held a market share of 41 % during the IP.
Drugi proizvajalci Skupnosti zadevnega izdelka so imeli v OP tržni delež v višini 41 %.
During the period considered, their sales volume decreased by 15 % and their market share declined by 9 percentage points.
V obravnavanem obdobju se je njihov obseg prodaje zmanjšal za 15 %, njihov tržni delež pa za 9 odstotnih točk.
This suggests that they are in a similar situation to the Community industry, i.e. that they have suffered injury from the dumped imports.
To nakazuje, da so v podobnem stanju kot industrija Skupnosti, tj. da so zaradi dampinškega uvoza utrpeli škodo.
Therefore, it cannot be concluded that other Community producers caused material injury to the Community industry.
Zato ni mogoče skleniti, da so drugi proizvajalci Skupnosti povzročili znatno škodo industriji Skupnosti.
Since the cost of raw materials is a substantial part of the total cost of production of PSF (about 60 % of total cost of production) it was also examined whether the material injury suffered by the Community industry had been caused by any increase of the raw material prices.
Ker je strošek surovin bistven del celotnih stroškov proizvodnje RVP (približno 60 % celotnih stroškov proizvodnje), je bilo proučeno tudi, ali je znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, povzročilo kakršno koli zvišanje cen surovin.
The production of so called virgin PSF is made out of derivatives of petroleum (mainly mono ethylene glycol — MEG — and purified terephthalic acid — PTA —).
Tako imenovani primarni RVP je proizveden iz derivatov nafte (v glavnem monoetilen glikol (MEG) in prečiščena tereftalna kislina (PTK)).
It can also be produced out of recycled materials (polyethylene terephthalate — PET — bottles and other waste).
Proizvede se lahko tudi iz recikliranih materialov (polietilen tereftalat (PET) – steklenice in drugi odpadki).
Finally, PSF can be made from a combination of both kinds of raw materials, derivatives of petroleum and recycled PET waste.
Nenazadnje je RVP mogoče izdelati s kombinacijo obeh vrst surovin, tj. derivatov nafte in recikliranih odpadkov PET.
Prices of MEG and PTA, as derivatives of petroleum, depend on the price fluctuations of this latter.
Cene MEG in PTK kot derivatov nafte so odvisne od nihanja cen nafte.
In this respect, as already explained in the Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2005 [6], prices of MEG and PTA increased from 2002 until the end of 2003 by 14 %.
Zato so se, kot je razloženo že v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 428/2005 [6], cene MEG in PTK zvišale za 14 % od leta 2002 do konca leta 2003.
In addition, on the basis of different submissions which referred to international sources for the MEG and PTA price evolutions, it was found that prices of MEG and PTA increased from 2003 until the mid of the IP by 25 % and 29 % respectively i.e. an increase of around 40 % between 2002 and mid 2005.
Poleg tega je bilo na podlagi različnih vlog, ki so se glede razvoja cen MEG in PTK oprle na mednarodne vire, ugotovljeno, da so se cene MEG in PTK od leta 2003 do OP zvišale za 25 % in 29 %, kar je povečanje za približno 40 % med letom 2002 in sredino leta 2005.
Extraction from Eurostat even showed a price increase of 36 % between 2002 and the IP for PTA and 75 % for the MEG during the same period.
Izvleček Eurostata celo kaže zvišanje cen za 36 % med letom 2002 in OP za PTK ter za 75 % za MEG v istem obdobju.
This trend was also confirmed by information submitted by the sole supplier of raw materials which cooperated.
Ta trend so potrdile tudi informacije, ki jih je predložil edini sodelujoči dobavitelj surovin.
As can be seen from recital 95 above the full cost of production increased by 17 % between 2002 and the IP.
Kot je razvidno iz uvodne izjave (95), so se celotni stroški proizvodnje povečali za 17 % med letom 2002 in OP.
This shows that rationalisation efforts have been made by the Community industry to improve its efficiency and offset in particular the effect of the raw materials price increase described in recitals 124 and 125 above.
To pomeni, da si je industrija Skupnosti prizadevala za racionalizacijo, da bi izboljšala svojo učinkovitost in zlasti izravnala učinek zvišanja cen surovin, ki je opisan v uvodni izjavi (124) in (125) zgoraj.
This is also confirmed by the gain in productivity as shown in recital 99.
To potrjuje tudi povečanje produktivnosti, kot je razvidno iz uvodne izjave (99).
However, in spite of the rationalisation efforts of the Community industry, this increase in raw materials prices could not be totally reflected in the average sales price of the Community produced PSF which rose by only 9 % from 2002 to the IP, despite the fact that fibres are price sensitive products.
Vendar se kljub prizadevanjem industrije Skupnosti za racionalizacijo to zvišanje cen surovin ni moglo v celoti odraziti v povprečni prodajni ceni RVP, proizvedenega v Skupnosti, ki se je od leta 2002 do OP zvišala za samo 9 %, kljub dejstvu, da so vlakna cenovno občutljivi izdelki.
Moreover, it is worth noting that all producers in the world, thus including those in the countries concerned, were facing similar increase in raw material prices as these are worldwide traded commodity products.
Nadalje je treba opomniti, da so se vsi proizvajalci po svetu, vključno s tistimi v zadevnih državah, soočali s podobnim zvišanjem cen surovin, saj je to blago, ki se trži po vsem svetu.
It is therefore clear that the producers in the countries concerned did not increase significantly their export prices to the Community to reflect that evolution.
Zato je jasno, da proizvajalci iz zadevnih držav niso bistveno zvišali svojih izvoznih cen v Skupnost, da bi odrazili ta razvoj.
It is therefore considered that the low level of export price from the countries concerned has caused a price suppression and led to a situation where the Community Industry could not increase its own sales prices adequately.
Tako se šteje, da je nizka raven izvozne cene iz zadevnih držav preprečila dvig cen in privedla do razmer, v katerih industrija Skupnosti ni mogla ustrezno zvišati svojih lastnih prodajnih cen.
Otherwise the loss in customers and market share would have been greater than the one found.
Sicer bi bila izguba strank in tržnega deleža večja od ugotovljene.
Accordingly, it is considered that even if it may appear that the increase of raw material costs may have contributed to some extent to the injury suffered by the Community industry, it is not the real cause of that injury.
V skladu s tem se šteje, da zvišanje cen surovin ni pravi vzrok omenjene škode, čeprav se morda zdi, da je do določene mere prispevalo k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
Indeed, it is the presence of low-priced dumped imports which prevented the Community industry to adapt their prices to the increased costs and thus have caused the material injury.
Dejansko je bil nizkocenovni dampinški uvoz tisti, ki je industriji Skupnosti preprečil, da bi svoje cene prilagodila povečanim stroškom, ter je tako povzročil znatno škodo.
Fluctuation of exchange rates
Nihanje menjalnih tečajev
Some interested parties argued that the price evolution of the imports concerned was influenced by the evolution of the Euro vis-à-vis the US dollar.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so trdile, da je na razvoj cen zadevnega uvoza vplival razvoj eura v primerjavi z ameriškim dolarjem.
It is true that between 2002 and the IP, the US dollar continuously depreciated, i.e. from 1,06 EUR to 0,79 EUR or – 25 %.
Res je, da je med letom 2002 in OP ameriški dolar nenehno izgubljal vrednost, tj. njegova vrednost je padla z 1,06 EUR na 0,79 EUR oziroma – 25 %.
It is recalled that the investigation has to establish whether the dumped imports (in terms of prices and volume) have caused material injury to the Community industry or whether such material injury was due to other factors.
Treba je opozoriti, da je treba s preiskavo ugotoviti, ali je dampinški uvoz (s svojim obsegom in ceno) povzročil znatno škodo industriji Skupnosti ali pa so jo povzročili drugi dejavniki.
In this respect, Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation states that it is necessary to show that the price level of the dumped imports cause injury.
Glede tega člen 3(6) osnovne uredbe navaja, da je treba dokazati, da raven cen dumpinškega uvoza povzroča škodo.
It therefore merely refers to a difference between price levels, and there is thus no requirement to analyse the factors affecting the level of those prices.
Nanaša se torej le na razliko med ravnmi cen, ne vsebuje pa zahteve za analizo dejavnikov, ki vplivajo na raven teh cen.
In practice, the effect of the dumped imports on the Community industry's prices is essentially examined by establishing price undercutting, price depression and price suppression.
V praksi se učinek, ki ga ima dampinški uvoz na cene industrije Skupnosti, prouči zlasti z ugotavljanjem nelojalnega nižanja cen, padca cen in preprečevanja dviga cen.
For this purpose, the dumped export prices and the Community industry's sales prices are compared, and export prices used for the injury calculations may sometimes need to be converted into another currency in order to have a comparable basis.
V ta namen se primerjajo cene dampinškega uvoza in prodajne cene industrije Skupnosti, izvozne cene, ki se uporabljajo za izračun škode, pa je včasih treba pretvoriti v drugo valuto, da se dobi primerljiva osnova.
Consequently, the use of exchange rates in this context only ensures that the price difference is established on a comparable basis.
Zato v tem okviru uporaba menjalnih tečajev zagotovi le, da se cenovna razlika ugotovi na primerljivi osnovi.
From this, it becomes obvious that the exchange rate can in principle not be another factor of the injury.
Tako je očitno, da menjalni tečaj načeloma ne more biti še en dejavnik škode.
The above is also confirmed by the wording of Article 3(7) of the basic Regulation, which refers to known factors other than dumped imports.
Zgoraj navedeno potrjuje tudi besedilo člena 3(7) osnovne uredbe, ki se nanaša na druge znane dejavnike poleg dampinškega uvoza.
The list of the other known factors in this Article does not make reference to any factor affecting the price level of the dumped imports.
Seznam drugih znanih dejavnikov iz tega člena se ne sklicuje na noben dejavnik, ki vpliva na raven cen dampinškega uvoza.
To summarise, if the exports are dumped, and even if they benefited from a favourable development of exchange rates, it is difficult to see how the development of such exchange rate could be another factor causing injury.
Povedano na kratko, če je izvoz dampinški in tudi če je bil izkoriščen ugoden razvoj menjalnih tečajev, je težko ugotoviti, kako bi bil razvoj takšnega menjalnega tečaja še en dejavnik, ki povzroča škodo.
Thus, the analysis of the factors affecting the level of the prices of the dumped imports, be it exchange rate fluctuations or something else, cannot be conclusive and such analysis would go beyond the requirements of the basic Regulation.
Zato analiza dejavnikov, ki vplivajo na raven cen dampinškega uvoza (naj bodo to nihanja menjalnih tečajev ali kaj drugega), ne more biti dokončna; takšna analiza bi presegla zahteve osnovne uredbe.
In any event, and without prejudice of the above, any allegation of the Euro appreciation in respect of the USD as a cause of injury of the Community industry should be especially valid for the period where said appreciation mainly took place i.e. from 2002 to 2004, and in particular during the first two years, when the differences among both currencies have been more accentuated.
V vsakem primeru in ne glede na zgoraj navedeno mora vsaka trditev, da je povečanje vrednosti eura v primerjavi z USD povzročilo škodo industriji Skupnosti, veljati predvsem za obdobje, ko se je v glavnem ta vrednost večala, tj. od leta 2002 do leta 2004 in zlasti v prvih dveh letih, ko so bile razlike med obema valutama večje.
In that respect, it is noteworthy that imports concerned decreased by 5 % between 2002 and 2003 while the sharpest depreciation of the USD vis-à-vis the Euro took place during the same period (i.e. -16 %).
V zvezi s tem je treba omeniti, da se je zadevni uvoz zmanjšal za 5 % med letoma 2002 in 2003, medtem ko je USD izgubil največ vrednosti v primerjavi z eurom v istem obdobju (tj. – 16 %).
Similarly, while the USD depreciated by 25 % between 2002 and 2004, imports concerned increased by only 16 %, while when the USD depreciated by a further 2 % between 2004 and 2005, imports concerned increased by 75 %.
Podobno se je zadevni uvoz povečal za samo 16 %, ko je USD izgubil 25 % vrednosti med letoma 2002 in 2004, medtem ko se je zadevni uvoz povečal za 75 %, ko je USD izgubil nadaljnja 2 % vrednosti med letoma 2004 in 2005.
Moreover, imports from countries other than those found to be dumping have also benefited from the appreciation of the Euro.
Nadalje je imel korist od povečane vrednosti eura tudi uvoz iz drugih držav in ne samo iz tistih, ki so izvajale damping.
However, their volumes increased much more smoothly than those from the countries concerned and their trend was more in line with the exchange rates fluctuations.
Vendar pa se je njihov obseg povečeval precej počasneje kot obseg iz zadevnih držav in njihov trend je bil bolj skladen z nihanji menjalnih tečajev.
Indeed, they increased by 35 % between 2002 and 2004 when USD depreciated by 25 % (while imports concerned increased by 17 %), and by only 7 % between 2004 and the IP, when the USD depreciated by a further 2 % (while imports concerned increased by 75 %).
Dejansko se je uvoz iz drugih držav povečal za 35 % med letoma 2002 in 2004, ko je USD izgubil 25 % vrednosti (medtem ko se je zadevni uvoz povečal za 17 %), in le za 7 % med letom 2004 in OP, ko je USD izgubil nadaljnja 2 % vrednosti (medtem ko se je zadevni uvoz povečal za 75 %).
The fact that currency exchange rates and imports from the countries concerned followed different trends (between 2002 and 2003) or trends with diverging extent (between 2004 and the IP) indicates that it cannot be considered as a causal factor for the surge of dumped imports from the countries concerned as argued by interested parties.
Dejstvo, da so menjalni tečaji in uvoz iz zadevnih držav sledili različnim trendom (med letom 2002 in 2003) ali nesorazmernim trendom (med letom 2004 in OP), kaže, da menjalni tečaj ne more biti vzročni dejavnik nagle velike rasti dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav, kot so trdile zainteresirane stranke.
Lack of restructuring of the Community industry
Pomanjkanje prestrukturiranja industrije Skupnosti