natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
At its Nitra establishment, the beneficiary will offer its customers only a ‘complementary’ service in order to ‘maintain the company’s market share, cash flow and economic results’ [13].
V obratu Nitra bo upravičenec svojim strankam ponudil le „dopolnilno“ storitev, da bi „ohranil tržni delež, denarni tok in gospodarske rezultate družbe“ [13].
It seemed difficult to justify aid in a situation where no additional activity is to be carried out.Second, the measure at issue constitutes individual aid, to be granted to a company active in a specific sector of extraction of raw materials.
Zdelo se je, da je težko upravičiti pomoč v razmerah, ko naj se ne bi izvajala nobena dodatna dejavnost.Drugič, zadevni ukrep pomeni individualno pomoč, ki naj bi se dodelila družbi, ki deluje v specifičnem sektorju pridobivanja surovin.
Consequently, this aid measure is to be considered selective with a greater impact on other companies active in the same sector.
Zato bi moral ta ukrep pomoči veljati za selektivno pomoč s precejšnjim vplivom na druga podjetja, ki delujejo v istem sektorju.
According to point 2 of RAG 1998, an individual ad hoc aid made to a single firm, or confined to one area of activity, may have a major impact on competition in the relevant market, and its effects on regional development are likely to be fairly limited.
V skladu s točko 2 SRP 1998 ima lahko individualna pomoč ad hoc, zagotovljena le enemu podjetju ali omejena na eno področje dejavnosti, velik vpliv na konkurenco na zadevnem trgu, poleg tega pa je zelo verjetno, da le malo prispeva k regionalnemu razvoju.
In conclusion, the RAG 1998 take a negative stance towards individual aid measures unless it can be proved that the regional contribution of the aid outweighs the distortion of competition and the effects on trade.
V SRP 1998 je izraženo negativno stališče glede ukrepov individualne pomoči, razen če je mogoče dokazati, da regionalni prispevek pomoči odtehta izkrivljanje konkurence in vplive na trgovino.
In this case, the Commission had doubts whether the limited contribution to regional development can justify the relatively high amount of aid per job created.
V tem primeru je Komisija dvomila, ali lahko omejeni prispevek k regionalnemu razvoju upraviči relativno visok znesek pomoči na ustvarjeno delovno mesto.
It transpires from the information submitted that only 81 direct jobs would be newly created, whereas some 57 direct jobs created by the beneficiary in the past would be maintained by the aided investments.
Iz predloženih informacij je razvidno, da bi bilo z naložbami, ki prejemajo pomoč, na novo ustvarjenih le 81 neposrednih delovnih mest, ohranilo pa bi se približno 57 neposrednih delovnih mest, ki jih je upravičenec ustvaril v preteklosti.
The new jobs would concern only five of the nine establishments of the project (see table above).
Nova delovna mesta bi se odprla le v petih od devetih obratov, vključenih v projekt (glej tabelo zgoraj).
The Commission noted that 34 out of the 81 newly created jobs should be created in the three new establishments envisaged [14].
Komisija je ugotovila, da bi se 34 od 81 na novo ustvarjenih delovnih mest odprlo v predvidenih treh novih obratih [14].
Consequently, the Commission had doubts as to whether the relatively high amount of aid per direct job created, in particular in a low wage sector (the aid per direct job created would correspond to around seven annual salaries), was justified.
Zato je Komisija dvomila, ali je relativno visok znesek pomoči na ustvarjeno neposredno delovno mesto, zlasti v sektorju z nizkimi plačami (pomoč na ustvarjeno neposredno delovno mesto bi ustrezala približno sedmim letnim plačam), upravičen.
Concerning the number of indirect jobs, in their letter dated 17 February 2007 the Slovak authorities initially indicated that 100 indirect jobs would be created.
Glede števila posrednih delovnih mest so slovaški organi v dopisu z dne 17. februarja 2007 najprej navedli, da bi bilo ustvarjenih 100 posrednih delovnih mest.
Later on, in their second letter of 4 June 2007 providing additional information, they referred to the statistics of the European Aggregates Association, claiming that indirect jobs would amount to 414-690.
Pozneje so se v drugem dopisu z dne 4. junija 2007, ki je vseboval dodatne informacije, sklicevali na statistične podatke Evropskega združenja agregatov (European Aggregates Association) in trdili, da bi bilo ustvarjenih 414–690 posrednih delovnih mest.
According to this study, in the sector in which the company is pursuing its business activities, approximately 3-5 jobs are created in respect of each newly created job.
Po tej študiji se v sektorju, v katerem družba deluje, za vsako novo delovno mesto odpre 3–5 delovnih mest.
In the information submission dated 13 August 2007, the Slovak authorities referred finally to a survey furnished to Alas by the University of Leoben (Austria), according to which in the sector of processing of raw materials, each new direct job corresponds to 30-40 indirect jobs [15].
V informacijah, predloženih 13. avgusta 2007, so se slovaški organi sklicevali na raziskavo, ki jo je družbi Alas zagotovila Univerza v Leobenu (Avstrija), po kateri v sektorju predelave surovin vsako novo neposredno delovno mesto pomeni 30–40 posrednih delovnih mest [15].
The Commission had doubts as to whether this general statement on mineral extraction was transferable to the situation of building materials.Moreover, the aid is granted to activities in the extraction industry whose location is determined not by the granting of aid, but by the availability of minerals; this is less affected by the regional handicaps that normally hamper regional development.
Komisija je dvomila, ali je ta splošna izjava za področje pridobivanja mineralnih surovin prenosljiva tudi na področje gradbenih materialov.Poleg tega je pomoč dodeljena dejavnostim v industriji pridobivanja, katere lokacija je določena glede na razpoložljivost mineralnih surovin, ne pa glede na dodelitev pomoči, zato ima regionalna prikrajšanost, ki običajno ovira regionalni razvoj, nanjo manjši vpliv.
Consequently, it can be assumed that it would be possible to exploit the resources even without the aid.
Iz tega se lahko sklepa, da bi bilo vire mogoče izkoriščati tudi brez pomoči.
In addition, since Alas was already operating in most of the establishments on the basis of long-term licences, the incentive effect of additional regional aid was doubtful.
Poleg tega je vprašljiv tudi spodbujevalni učinek dodatne regionalne pomoči, saj je družba Alas v večini obratov že delovala na podlagi dolgoročnih licenc.
Third, the likely limited contribution to regional development has to be balanced against the effect on trade and distortion of competition of the aid measure which, according to the Slovak authorities, is also expected to be small.
Tretjič, verjetnost omejenega prispevka k regionalnemu razvoju je treba primerjati z vplivom ukrepa pomoči na trgovino in izkrivljanje konkurence, ki naj bi bil po trditvah slovaških organov majhen.
The selling radius of the products concerned is limited (approximately 50 km by road or 150 km by rail) owing to their relatively small value with regard to the cost of transport.
Obseg prodaje zadevnih proizvodov je omejen (približno 50 km po cesti ali 150 km po železnici) zaradi njihove relativno majhne vrednosti glede na stroške prevoza.
The Slovak authorities indicated that only one establishment (Hontianske Trsťany — Hrondín) would be in a position to export part of its production (up to 50 thousand tonnes of building stone annually worth SKK 9 million) to Hungary.
Slovaški organi so navedli, da bi bil le en obrat (Hontianske Trsťany – Hrondín) sposoben izvažati del proizvodnje (do 50 tisoč ton gradbenega kamna na leto v vrednosti 9 milijonov SKK) na Madžarsko.
Three other establishments (Veľký Cetín, Okoč and Komjatice) are expected to compete with imports from Hungary.
Za druge tri obrate (Veľký Cetín, Okoč in Komjatice) se pričakuje, da bodo konkurirali uvozu iz Madžarske.
Alas Slovakia, s.r.o. does not expect to compete with other companies mining and processing minerals from Austria or the Czech Republic.
Družba Alas Slovakia, s.r.o., ne pričakuje, da bo konkurirala drugim podjetjem iz Avstrije ali Češke, ki se ukvarjajo s pridobivanjem in predelavo mineralnih surovin.
However, this seemed to be in contradiction with the information contained in the application for the first part of the aid, submitted to the Slovak authorities on 16 April 2003, where potential competitors from these two countries were mentioned.
Vendar pa se je to zdelo v nasprotju z informacijami, vsebovanimi v prošnji za prvi del pomoči, ki so jo slovaški organi predložili 16. aprila 2003, v kateri so bili omenjeni možni konkurenti iz teh dveh držav.
Taking into account the location of the establishments concerned, the Commission had doubts about the extent to which trade with other Member States (e.g. Austria or the Czech Republic) would be distorted.
Ob upoštevanju lokacije zadevnih obratov je Komisija dvomila o obsegu izkrivljanja trgovine z drugimi državami članicami (na primer Avstrija ali Češka).
Finally, as laid down in the Commission notice on the definition of the relevant market for the purposes of Community competition law [16], in certain cases, even if the deliveries from a given plant are limited to a certain area around that plant, the distribution of plants may be such that the areas around the different plants overlap significantly.
Četrtič, kot je določeno v Obvestilu Komisije o opredelitvi upoštevnega trga za namene konkurenčnega prava Skupnosti [16], je v nekaterih primerih, čeprav so dobave iz določene proizvodne enote omejene na določeno območje okoli te proizvodne enote, porazdelitev proizvodnih enot taka, da se območja okoli različnih proizvodnih enot občutno prekrivajo.
If so, it is possible that the pricing of those products would be affected by a chain substitution effect, leading to impacts on a broader geographic market.As a result, the Commission had doubts as to whether the expected contribution of the aid to regional development would offset its negative effects on trade.
V tem primeru je mogoče, da na oblikovanje cen takih proizvodov vpliva učinek verižne zamenljivosti, ki povzroči učinke na širši geografski trg.Zato je Komisija dvomila, ali bi lahko pričakovani prispevek pomoči k regionalnem razvoju odtehtal njegove negativne učinke na trgovino.
No comments were received from the Slovak authorities or from third parties to dispel the doubts raised when the formal investigation was initiated.
Slovaški organi ali tretje stranke niso predložili nobenih pripomb, ki bi odpravile dvome, predstavljene ob sprožitvi uradne preiskave.
By notifying the aid measure with a standstill clause until authorised by the Commission, the Slovak authorities have complied with the procedural requirements of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty.
Ker so slovaški organi priglasili ukrep pomoči s klavzulo o mirovanju, dokler ga ne odobri Komisija, so izpolnili postopkovne zahteve člena 88(3) Pogodbe ES.
The Commission considers that the measure constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty for the following reasons, already indicated in the opening decision.
Komisija meni, da ukrep pomeni državno pomoč po členu 87(1) Pogodbe ES zaradi razlogov, ki so že bili navedeni v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka.
State resources are involved since an exemption from the payment of corporate income tax is provided for.
Vključeni so državni viri, saj je načrtovana oprostitev plačila davka od dobička pravnih oseb.
The measure relieves Alas Slovakia, s.r.o. of costs it would have to bear under normal market conditions.
Ukrep družbo Alas Slovakia, s.r.o., razbremenjuje stroškov, ki bi jih sicer imela v normalnih tržnih pogojih.
It will therefore provide an advantage to Alas Slovakia, s.r.o. over other companies.
Zato bi družbi Alas Slovakia, s.r.o., zagotovil prednost pred drugimi družbami.
The measure is selective since it addresses only one undertaking.
Ukrep je selektiven, saj velja za eno samo podjetje.
Finally, the production covered by the project is subject to trade.
Proizvodnja, zajeta v projektu, je vključena v trgovanje.
Therefore, trade between Member States is affected.
Zato ukrep vpliva na trgovino med državami članicami.
In addition, the advantage granted to Alas Slovakia, s.r.o. and its production distorts competition or is liable to distort competition.
Poleg tega prednost, dodeljena družbi Alas Slovakia, s.r.o. in za njeno proizvodnjo, izkrivlja ali bi lahko izkrivljala konkurenco.
In so far as the measure constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty, its compatibility must be assessed in the light of the exceptions provided for in Article 87(2) and (3) of the EC Treaty.
Če ukrep pomeni državno pomoč po členu 87(1) Pogodbe ES, je treba njegovo združljivost oceniti glede na izjeme iz člena 87(2) in (3) Pogodbe ES.
The measure cannot be considered to be an important project of common European interest or aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the Slovak economy, as provided for by Article 87(3)(b) of the EC Treaty.
Ukrepa ni mogoče obravnavati kot pomembnega projekta skupnega evropskega interesa ali pomoč za odpravljanje resne motnje v gospodarstvu Slovaške, kot je opredeljeno v členu 87(3)(b) Pogodbe ES.
The measure does not qualify either for the exception allowed by Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty that provides for the authorisation of aid to facilitate the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic areas, where such aid does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent that is contrary to the common interest.
Ukrep tudi ne izpolnjuje pogojev za izvzetje, dopuščeno v členu 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES, ki določa odobritev pomoči za pospeševanje razvoja nekaterih gospodarskih dejavnosti ali gospodarskih območij, kadar taka pomoč ne vpliva škodljivo na trgovinske pogoje v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
The regions of Nitra, Trnava and Trenčín (Western Slovakia) are eligible under this derogation.
Regije Nitra, Trnava in Trenčín (zahodna Slovaška) izpolnjujejo pogoje v skladu s tem odstopanjem.
In its decision to open the formal investigation procedure, the Commission explained the reasons, summarised in Section III of this Decision, for which it doubted that the measure under scrutiny could qualify for the derogation under Article 87(3)(a) of the EC Treaty.
V svoji odločitvi o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave je Komisija razložila razloge, povzete v delu III te odločbe, zaradi katerih je dvomila, da bi obravnavani ukrep lahko izpolnil pogoje za odstopanje po členu 87(3)(a) Pogodbe ES.
In the absence of any comments from the Slovak Republic or third parties, the Commission can deem these doubts to be confirmed.
Ker Slovaška in tretje stranke niso predložile nobenih pripomb, lahko Komisija domneva, da so ti dvomi potrjeni.
The Commission finds that the measure notified by the Slovak Republic, as set out in paragraphs 6 to 10 above, is not compatible with the common market under any derogation laid down in the EC Treaty, and must be prohibited.
Komisija ugotavlja, da ukrep, ki ga je priglasila Slovaška, kot je podrobneje razložen v odstavkih 6 do 10 zgoraj, ni združljiv s skupnim trgom po nobenem od odstopanj, opredeljenih v Pogodbi ES, in ga je treba prepovedati.
According to the Slovak authorities, the aid has not yet been granted and, therefore, there is no need for its recovery,
Po trditvah slovaških organov pomoč ni bila dodeljena, zato je ni treba povrniti –
The notified tax concession constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Priglašena davčna ugodnost pomeni državno pomoč po členu 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
The State aid which the Slovak Republic is planning to implement for Alas Slovakia, s.r.o. for up to SKK 100813444 (approximately EUR 2,89 million) is not compatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč, ki jo Slovaška namerava dodeliti družbi Alas Slovakia, s.r.o., v znesku do 100813444 SKK (približno 2,89 milijona EUR), je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
In view of this, the aid may not be implemented.
Zato se pomoč ne sme dodeliti.
The Slovak Republic shall inform the Commission, within two months of notification of this Decision, of the measures taken to comply with the Decision.
Slovaška v dveh mesecih po obvestilu o tej odločbi obvesti Komisijo o sprejetih ukrepih za izpolnitev te odločbe.
OJ C 30, 2.2.2008, p. 13.
UL C 30, 2.2.2008, str. 13.
By letter dated 13 February 2006, the Commission asked the Slovak authorities to submit for evaluation nine different notifications so that it could assess the compatibility of each of the nine projects on the basis of their individual merits.
Z dopisom z dne 13. februarja 2006 je Komisija zaprosila slovaške organe, da v proučitev predložijo devet različnih priglasitev, da bi lahko ocenila združljivost za vsakega od devetih projektov na podlagi individualnih zaslug.
In their reply of 12 March 2007, the Slovak authorities explained to the Commission that Alas Slovakia s.r.o., constituted a single tax entity with several establishments, with a single tax liability.
Slovaški organi so v odgovoru z dne 12. marca 2007 Komisiji razložili, da je družba Alas Slovakia s.r.o en davčni zavezanec, ki ima več obratov z enotno davčno obveznostjo.
The applicable Slovak legislation does not allow taxpayers to calculate the tax base and the corporate tax for each organisational unit separately.
Veljavna slovaška zakonodaja davčnim zavezancem ne dopušča, da davčno osnovo in davek na dohodek pravnih oseb obračunavajo za vsako organizacijsko enoto posebej.
Therefore, the Slovak authorities consider that it is not possible to calculate the amount of aid received by each establishment.
Zato slovaški organi menijo, da ni mogoče obračunavati zneska prejete pomoči za vsak obrat posebej.
In the municipalities of: Nitra, Komjatice, Veľký Cetín, Hontianske Trsťany-Hrondín.
V občinah: Nitra, Komjatice, Veľký Cetín, Hontianske Trsťany-Hrondín.
In the municipalities of: Červeník, Veľký Grob, Okoč.
V občinah: Červeník, Veľký Grob, Okoč.
In the municipalities of: Kamenec pod Vtáčnikom, Prievidza.
V občinah: Kamenec pod Vtáčnikom, Prievidza.
State aid SK 72/2003 — Slovak Republic — ‘Regional State aid map of the Slovak Republic’.
Državna pomoč SK 72/2003 – Slovaška – „Karta regionalnih državnih pomoči Slovaške“.
Expressed at 2007 value and calculated at a reference rate of 5,62 % applicable on the date of the notification.
Izraženo v vrednosti iz leta 2007 in preračunano po referenčni meri 5,62 %, ki je veljala na datum priglasitve.
By notification No 1108/2003 of the Slovak Office for State Aid, issued on 25 August 2003, State aid was approved for Alas Slovakia, s.r.o. (2003 to 2012), in accordance with Section 35a of Act No 472/2002, as amended, and Act No 366/1999, for a maximum level of SKK 87145485.
S priglasitvijo slovaškega urada za državno pomoč št. 1108/2003, ki je bila izdana 25. avgusta 2003, je bila odobrena državna pomoč za Alas Slovakia, s.r.o., (2003–2012) v skladu z oddelkom 35a Zakona št. 472/2002, kot je bil spremenjen, in Zakonom št. 366/1999 za znesek do 87145485 SKK.
Under the interim procedure, this State aid (SK 53/03) was considered ‘existing aid’.
V skladu z začasnim postopkom se je ta državna pomoč (SK 53/03) štela za „obstoječo pomoč“.
Act No 231/1999 Coll. on State aid, as amended, Act No 595/2003 Coll. on income tax, as amended, and Act No 366/1999 Coll. on income taxes, as amended, as in force on 31 December 2003, in particular Section 52(3) of Act No 595/2003 Coll. on income tax, as amended, under the conditions specified in Section 35a of Act No 366/1999 Coll. on income taxes, as amended, as in force on 31 December 2003.
Zakon o državni pomoči št. 231/1999, kot je bil spremenjen, Zakon o davku od dohodkov št. 595/2003, kot je bil spremenjen, in Zakon o davku od dohodkov št. 366/1999, kot je bil spremenjen in kakor je veljal na dan 31. decembra 2003, predvsem oddelek 52(3) Zakona o davku od dohodkov št. 595/2003, kot je bil spremenjen, pod pogoji, določenimi v oddelku 35a Zakona o davku od dohodkov št. 366/1999, kot je bil spremenjen in kakor je veljal na dan 31. decembra 2003.
Letter from the Slovak Ministry of Finance, dated 31 May 2007 (ref. MF/8790/2007-832).
Dopis slovaškega ministrstva za finance z dne 31. maja 2007 (št. MF/8790/2007-832).
In this respect, it should be underlined that 16 new jobs out of 81 should be created at the site of Červeník, for which the permit for extraction has not yet been granted.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da bi bilo 16 od skupaj 81 novih delovnih mest ustvarjenih v občini Červeník, za katero še ni bilo izdano dovoljenje za pridobivanje.
‘Socioeconomic study in the sector of final products made from minerals reveals that the number of jobs created in the sector minerals processing is 30-40 times higher than the number of jobs in the mineral sector’ (quoted on page 31 of the study entitled ‘Survey of minerals planning politics in Europe’ commissioned by DG Enterprise and Industry).
„Socialno-ekonomska študija v sektorju končnih izdelkov iz mineralov je pokazala, da je število delovnih mest, ustvarjenih v sektorju predelave mineralnih surovin, 30–40-krat višje od števila delovnih mest v sektorju pridobivanja nekovinskih mineralnih surovin“ (navedeno na strani 31 študije z naslovom „Survey of minerals planning politics in Europe“ (Raziskava o politiki načrtovanja pridobivanja mineralov v Evropi), ki jo je naročil Generalni direktorat za podjetništvo in industrijo).
The annual concession is limited to 50 % of the corporate tax liability of Alas Slovakia, s.r.o.
Letna ugodnost je omejena na 50 % davčne obveznosti družbe Alas Slovakia, s.r.o.
The total amount of the tax concession is limited to SKK 100813444 at current value [9] (approximately EUR 2,89 million).
Skupni znesek davčne ugodnosti je omejen na 100813444 SKK v sedanji vrednosti [9] (približno 2,89 milijona EUR).
Such aid generally comes within the scope of specific sectoral industrial policies and is not in line with the spirit of regional aid policy as such. The latter must remain neutral towards the allocation of productive resources between the various economic sectors and activities.
Taka pomoč na splošno spada v področje nekaterih sektorskih industrijskih politik in ni v skladu z duhom politike regionalne pomoči, ki mora ostati nepristranska, kar zadeva razdelitev proizvodnih virov med različne gospodarske sektorje in dejavnosti.
of 16 September 2008
z dne 16. septembra 2008
appointing a Commission representative to the Management Board of the European Medicines Agency
o imenovanju predstavnika Komisije v upravo Evropske agencije za zdravila
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency [1], and in particular Article 65 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 726/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o postopkih Skupnosti za pridobitev dovoljenja za promet in nadzor zdravil za humano in veterinarsko uporabo ter o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za zdravila [1] in zlasti člena 65 Uredbe,
Pursuant to Article 65 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, the Management Board of the European Medicines Agency (hereinafter the Agency) is to include two representatives of the Commission.
V skladu s členom 65 Uredbe (ES) št. 726/2004 mora uprava Evropske agencije za zdravila (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) vključevati dva predstavnika Komisije.
Due to reallocation of competences within the Commission it is necessary to appoint one new member of the Management Board of the Agency from the Directorate General for Health and Consumers and an alternate who will replace the member in his absence and vote on his behalf,
Zaradi prerazporeditve pristojnosti znotraj Komisije je treba imenovati enega novega člana uprave Agencije iz Generalnega direktorata za zdravje in potrošnike ter enega namestnika, ki bo člana v njegovi odsotnosti nadomeščal in glasoval v njegovem imenu –