natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To ensure an adequate and reliable system for identification of the agricultural parcels, the provisions concerning the declaration of areas and in particular, the need to indicate the new boundaries of the reference parcels when the pre-printed application form is corrected, needs to be clarified.
Da se zagotovi ustrezen in zanesljiv sistem za identifikacijo enot rabe oziroma poljin, je treba pojasniti določbe v zvezi s prijavo površin in zlasti potrebo po navedbi novih mej referenčnih enot rabe oziroma poljin, kadar je predhodno natisnjeni zahtevek popravljen.
Following the amended rules for payments for energy crops and the introduction of the written declaration provided for in Article 33(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 of 29 October 2004 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 as regards the support schemes provided for in Titles IV and IVa of that Regulation and the use of land set aside for the production of raw materials [3] as amended by Regulation (EC) No 270/2007 [4], Articles 13 and 24 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 should be amended accordingly.
Po spremembi pravil za plačila za energetske rastline in uvedbi pisne izjave iz člena 33(2) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1973/2004 z dne 29. oktobra 2004 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 v zvezi s shemami podpor iz naslova IV in IVa navedene uredbe, glede uporabe zemljišč v prahi za proizvodnjo surovin [3], kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 270/2007 [4], je treba člena 13 in 24 Uredbe (ES) št. 796/2004 ustrezno spremeniti.
To verify the eligibility of certain payments, the farmer is required to send supporting documents when he is making his application.
Za preverjanje upravičenosti nekaterih plačil se od kmeta zahteva, da ob vložitvi zahtevka predloži spremne dokumente.
In order to simplify the administration for the farmer as well as for the national authorities, it should be possible for the national authority to require those documents directly from the source of information.
Da bi se administracija za kmete in nacionalne organe poenostavila, je treba nacionalnim organom omogočiti, da zahtevajo te dokumente neposredno od vira informacij.
The integration of the banana reference amounts into the single payment scheme following the reform in the banana sector, as provided for by Council Regulation (EC) No 2013/2006 of 19 December 2006 amending Regulations (EEC) No 404/93, (EC) No 1782/2003 and (EC) No 247/2006 as regards the banana sector [5], requires flexibility concerning possible additions and amendments to the single application during the year 2007.
Vključitev referenčnih zneskov za banane v shemo enotnih plačil po reformi v sektorju banan, kot je določeno z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2013/2006 z dne 19. decembra 2006 o spremembah uredb (EGS) št. 404/93, (ES) št. 1782/2003 in (ES) št. 247/2006 v zvezi s sektorjem banan [5], zahteva prilagodljivost v zvezi z mogočimi dopolnitvami in spremembami enotnega zahtevka v letu 2007.
However, the dates for the submission of the single application as provided for in Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 should be maintained in order to allow the Member States to organise their respective control programmes in due time.
Vendar je treba ohraniti roke za predložitev enotnega zahtevka, kot je določeno v členu 11 Uredbe (ES) št. 796/2004, da se državam članicam omogoči pravočasna organizacija njihovih kontrolnih programov.
Based on experience, the current provisions for selection of farmers for on-the-spot checks and the control rates should be improved and more flexibility should be given to the Member States.
Na podlagi izkušenj je treba izboljšati sedanje določbe v zvezi z izbiro kmetov, pri katerih je treba opraviti preglede na kraju samem, in stopnje kontrole, državam članicam pa je treba omogočiti več prilagodljivosti.
This can be achieved by setting the requirement of a sample to at least 5 % of the farmers applying for the single payment scheme or the single area payment scheme.
To se lahko doseže z določitvijo zahteve, da je treba opraviti pregled pri najmanj 5 % vseh kmetov, ki zaprosijo za shemo enotnih plačil ali shemo enotnih plačil na površino.
At the same time the Member State should assure that at least 3 % of the farmers applying for the aid schemes provided for under Titles III, IV and IVa of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 are selected for control.
Hkrati morajo države članice zagotoviti, da je za kontrolo izbranih vsaj 3 % kmetov, ki zaprosijo za sheme pomoči iz naslovov III, IV in IVa Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003.
The control rate for farmers whose agricultural parcels are being declared by a producer group applying for hops payments should be adapted accordingly.
Stopnjo kontrole za kmete, katerih kmetijska zemljišča prijavlja skupina proizvajalcev, ki vlaga zahtevek za plačila za hmelj, je treba ustrezno prilagoditi.
For ovine and caprine premia, the introduction of a centralised database for registration of the animals justifies a decrease of the control rate.
V zvezi s premijami za ovce in koze uvedba centralizirane podatkovne baze za registracijo živali upravičuje znižanje stopnje kontrole.
Taking too many pre-defined factors into account when doing the risk analyses to select a sample for on-the-spot controls could have an adverse effect on the sample.
Kadar se pri opravljanju analiz tveganja za izbor vzorca za preglede na kraju samem upošteva preveč predhodno določenih dejavnikov, ima to lahko škodljiv učinek na vzorec.
Therefore it is appropriate to give the responsibility to choose the risk factors to the competent authority as it is in a better position to chose the relevant risk factors.
Zato je ustrezno, da je za izbiro dejavnikov tveganja odgovoren pristojni organ, ker lahko ustrezne dejavnike tveganja izbere lažje.
To assure relevant and efficient risk analyses, the effectiveness of the risk analyses should be assessed and updated on an annual basis taking into account the relevance of each risk factor, comparing the results of randomly and risk based selected samples and the specific situation in the Member State.
Za zagotovitev ustreznih in učinkovitih analiz tveganja je treba vsako leto oceniti in posodobiti učinkovitost analiz tveganja, pri čemer se upošteva ustreznost vsakega dejavnika tveganja s primerjavo rezultatov vzorcev, izbranih naključno na podlagi tveganja, in posameznih razmer v državi članici.
In order to make it possible to start the on-the-spot checks as early as possible in the year also before all information on the application forms is available, it should be possible for the competent authority to make a partial selection of the control sample based on already available information.
Da se omogoči začetek pregledov na kraju samem čim prej v letu in tudi preden so dostopne vse informacije o zahtevkih, je treba pristojnemu organu omogočiti delni izbor kontrolnega vzorca na podlagi že dostopnih informacij.
Rules for identification and registration of ovine and caprine animals have been introduced by Council Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 of 17 December 2003 establishing a system for the identification and registration of ovine and caprine animals and amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and Directives 92/102/EEC and 64/432/EEC [6].
Pravila za identifikacijo in registracijo ovc in koz določa Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 21/2004 z dne 17. decembra 2003 o uvedbi sistema za identifikacijo in registracijo ovc in koz ter o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 in direktiv 92/102/EGS in 64/432/EGS [6].
Those rules also apply on animals for which an aid is applied for.
Ta pravila se uporabljajo tudi za živali, za katere se zaprosi pomoč.
Therefore the relevant provisions in Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 should be updated.
Zato je treba ustrezne določbe iz Uredbe (ES) št. 796/2004 posodobiti.
On-the-spot checks can either be performed by a visit on the farm or via remote sensing.
Pregledi na kraju samem se lahko izvedejo ob obisku kmetije ali prek daljinskega zaznavanja.
The two ways of performing the checks have equal value and that should be clarified by streamlining the rules for the different ways of performing an on-the-spot check.
Oba načina izvajanja pregledov sta enakovredna, kar je treba pojasniti s posodobitvijo pravil za različne načine izvajanja pregledov na kraju samem.
In order to ensure the quality of the on-the-spot checks, provisions to assure a minimum quality of measurements of areas should be introduced and the means used should be proven to assure a quality at least equivalent to that required by applicable technical standard as drawn up at Community level.
Za zagotovitev kakovosti pregledov na kraju samem je treba sprejeti določbe za zagotovitev minimalne kakovosti meritev površin, uporabljena sredstva pa morajo dokazano zagotavljati kakovost, ki je vsaj enakovredna kakovosti, potrebni za veljavni tehnični standard, kot je oblikovan na ravni Skupnosti.
Experience has shown that the use of a perimeter tolerance when measuring parcels is the most appropriate.
Izkušnje so pokazale, da je pri meritvi zemljišč najustreznejša uporaba odstopanja obsega.
Focusing on the perimeter tolerance would furthermore simplify the systems and assure equal treatment of farmers in different Member States.
Večja uporaba odstopanja obsega bi še bolj poenostavila sisteme in zagotovila enakovredno obravnavo kmetov v različnih državah članicah.
Experience gained shows that it is possible to simplify the check of documents during the on-the-spot controls for livestock premia without jeopardising the quality of the check.
Izkušnje kažejo, da je med pregledi na kraju samem mogoče poenostaviti preverjanje dokumentov za premije za živali, ne da bi bila pri tem ogrožena kakovost pregleda.
However, if anomalies are found during the check, the time period for which the documents should be checked should be extended.
Če se med pregledom kljub temu pojavijo nepravilnosti, je treba podaljšati časovno obdobje, v katerem se preverjajo dokumenti.
In relation to applications for area related payments, differences between the total area declared in the application and the total area determined as eligible are often insignificant.
V zvezi z zahtevki za plačila na površino so razlike med skupno površino, prijavljeno v zahtevku, in skupno površino, ugotovljeno kot primerno, pogosto nepomembne.
To avoid a high number of minor adjustments of applications it should be provided that the aid application should not be adjusted to the area determined unless a certain level of differences is exceeded.
Da se prepreči veliko število manjših prilagoditev zahtevkov, je treba določiti, da se zahtevek za pomoč ne prilagodi glede na ugotovljeno površino, razen če se preseže neka stopnja razlik.
The general principle applied is that there is no tolerance when a farmer has intentionally over declared his area.
Uporablja se splošno načelo, da se odstopanje ne upošteva, kadar je kmet namerno prijavil površino, ki presega odstopanje.
This can lead to an undesired reduction of the payment.
To lahko povzroči neželeno zmanjšanje plačila.
A threshold should therefore be introduced also in case of intentional over declaration to assure proportionality when this over declaration is of a limited nature.
Mejno vrednost je treba zato določiti tudi v primeru namerne prijave površine, ki presega odstopanje, da se zagotovi sorazmernost, kadar je ta prijava omejena.
Nevertheless, it is still an intentional act by the farmer and the tolerance should therefore be at very low level.
Kljub temu gre za namerno dejanje kmeta, zato je lahko odstopanje zelo majhno.
When a Member State makes use of the possibility provided for in Article 69 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and the payments are granted for areas or livestock it is appropriate to apply the rules in Title IV of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004.
Kadar država članica izkoristi možnost iz člena 69 Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 in so plačila odobrena za površine ali živali, je ustrezno, da se uporabijo pravila iz naslova IV Uredbe (ES) št. 796/2004.
This needs to be clarified and Article 63 of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 should be amended accordingly.
To je treba pojasniti, člen 63 Uredbe (ES) št. 796/2004 pa je treba ustrezno spremeniti.
In certain cases unduly allocations of entitlements did not affect the total value, but only the number of the entitlements of the farmer.
V nekaterih primerih neupravičene dodelitve pravic niso vplivale na skupno vrednost, ampak le na število pravic kmeta.
In these cases, the Member States should correct the allocation or where appropriate the type of entitlements, without reducing the value hereof.
V teh primerih morajo države članice popraviti dodelitev ali, kadar je ustrezno, vrsto pravic, pri čemer vrednost ne sme biti manjša.
The provision should only apply if the farmer could not have detected the error.
Določba se lahko uporablja le, če kmet ne more odkriti napake.
The reporting requirements for the Member States should be updated to assure an efficient reporting of the checks of the production aids for starch potatoes, seeds and tobacco.
Zahteve po poročanju držav članic je treba posodobiti, da se zagotovi učinkovito poročanje o pregledih pomoči za proizvodnjo škrobnega krompirja, seme in tobak.
Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 796/2004 je treba zato ustrezno spremeniti.
The provision related to the inclusion of banana reference amounts into the single payment scheme provided for in this Regulation concerns aid applications relating to years or premium periods starting from 1 January 2007.
Določba v zvezi z vključitvijo referenčnih zneskov za banane v shemo enotnih plačil iz te uredbe zadeva zahtevke za pomoč, ki zadevajo leta ali premijska obdobja z začetkom 1. januarja 2007.
This also applies for the provision including Bulgaria and Romania in the definition of ‘new Member States’.
To velja tudi za določbo, ki vključuje v opredelitev „novih držav članic“ Bolgarijo in Romunijo.
Those provisions should therefore apply from 1 January 2007.
Te določbe se zato uporabljajo od 1. januarja 2007.
in the first paragraph, point (1)(a) is replaced by the following:
V odstavku 1 se točka 1(a) nadomesti z naslednjim:
“agricultural parcel”: shall mean a continuous area of land on which a single crop group is cultivated by a single farmer; however, where a separate declaration of the use of an area within a crop group is required in the context of this Regulation, that specific use shall further limit the agricultural parcel;’
‚enota rabe oziroma poljina‘: pomeni strnjeno površino kmetijskega zemljišča, na kateri en proizvajalec goji eno skupino posevkov; vendar kadar se v smislu te uredbe zahteva posebna prijava uporabe površine znotraj skupine posevkov, ta posebna uporaba še bolj omeji enoto rabe oziroma poljino;“
the second paragraph is replaced by the following:
Drugi odstavek se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘For the purposes of this Regulation, “new Member States” shall mean Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovenia and Slovakia.’;
„Za namene te uredbe so ‚nove države članice‘ Bolgarija, Češka republika, Estonija, Ciper, Latvija, Litva, Madžarska, Malta, Poljska, Romunija, Slovenija in Slovaška.“
Article 8(2) is replaced by the following:
Člen 8(2) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Where an area is used in common, the competent authorities shall notionally allocate it between the individual farmers in proportion to their use or right of use of it.’;
Kadar je površina skupna, jo pristojni organi teoretično razdelijo med posamezne kmete sorazmerno z njihovo uporabo ali pravico uporabe.“
in the second subparagraph of Article 12(4), the first sentence is replaced by the following:
V drugem pododstavku člena 12(4) se prvi stavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘If the correction relates to the reference parcel area, the farmer shall declare the up-to-date area of each agricultural parcel concerned and where necessary indicate the new boundaries of the reference parcel.’;
„Če se popravek nanaša na referenčno površino enote rabe oziroma poljine, prijavi kmet posodobljeno površino vsake zadevne enote rabe oziroma poljine in po potrebi navede nove meje referenčne enote rabe oziroma poljine.“
In the case of an application for energy crops provided for in Chapter 5 of Title IV of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, the single application shall contain a copy of the contract the applicant has concluded with a collector or a first processor pursuant to Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 or, in case of application of Article 33(2) of that Regulation, a written declaration in accordance with that Article.’;
Pri zahtevku za energetske rastline iz poglavja 5 naslova IV Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 vsebuje enotni zahtevek kopijo pogodbe, ki jo je vlagatelj sklenil z zbiralcem ali prvim predelovalcem v skladu s členom 25 Uredbe (ES) št. 1973/2004, ali v primeru uporabe člena 33(2) navedene uredbe pisno izjavo v skladu z navedenim členom.“
The information required in the supporting documents set out in this Article may, when possible, be requested directly from the source of the information by the competent authority.’;
Informacije, ki se zahtevajo v spremnih dokumentih iz tega člena, lahko pristojni organ, kadar je mogoče, zahteva neposredno od vira informacij.“
in paragraph 1, the third and fourth subparagraphs are replaced by the following:
V odstavku 1 se tretji in četrti pododstavek nadomestita z naslednjim:
‘Where the amendments referred to in the first and second subparagraphs have a bearing on any supporting documents or contracts to be submitted, the related amendments to such documents or contracts shall also be allowed.’;
„Kadar so spremembe iz prvega in drugega pododstavka pomembne za spremne dokumente ali pogodbe, ki jih je treba predložiti, je treba dovoliti tudi s tem povezane spremembe takih dokumentov ali pogodb.“
in paragraph 2, the second subparagraph is replaced by the following:
Drugi pododstavek odstavka 2 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘However, in respect of the year 2007, the amendments made in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article shall be notified to the competent authority by 15 June at the latest in those Member States which apply Article 48c(8) of Regulation (EC) No 795/2004.
„Vendar je treba za leto 2007 spremembe v skladu z odstavkom 1 tega člena v državah članicah, ki uporabljajo člen 48c(8) Uredbe (ES) št. 795/2004, uradno sporočiti pristojnemu organu najpozneje do 15. junija.
In duly justified cases, notifications of such amendments shall be accepted until 20 days following the publication of Regulation (EC) No 972/2007 in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V ustrezno utemeljenih primerih se uradna sporočila sprememb sprejemajo do dvajsetega dneva po objavi Uredbe (ES) št 972/2007 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
in Article 17a(2), the second subparagraph is deleted;
V členu 17a(2) se črta drugi pododstavek.
Article 21(3) is deleted;
Člen 21(3) se črta.
Article 24(1)(f) is replaced by the following:
V členu 24(1) se točka (f) nadomesti z naslednjim:
where supporting documents, contracts, growing declarations or written declarations in accordance with Article 33(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 have to be submitted and where applicable, between the agricultural parcels as declared in the single application and in the supporting documents, contracts, growing declarations or written declarations in accordance with Article 33(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 to verify the eligibility for aid of the area;’
kadar je treba predložiti spremne dokumente, pogodbe, izjave o pridelavi ali pisne izjave v skladu s členom 33(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1973/2004 in, kadar je primerno, med enotami rabe oziroma poljin, kakor so prijavljene v enotnem zahtevku in v spremnih dokumentih, pogodbah, izjavah o pridelavi ali pisnih izjavah v skladu s členom 33(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1973/2004, da bi preverili upravičenost zemljišča do pomoči;“
The total number of on-the-spot checks carried out each year shall cover at least 5 % of all farmers applying for the single payment scheme or the single area payment scheme.
Skupno število pregledov na kraju samem, izvedenih vsako leto, zajema vsaj 5 % vseh kmetov, ki zaprosijo za shemo enotnih plačil ali shemo enotnih plačil na površino.
The Member States shall assure that on-the-spot checks cover at least 3 % of the farmers applying for aid under each of other area related aid schemes provided for under Titles III, IV and IVa of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003.’;
Države članice zagotovijo, da so za preglede na kraju samem izbrani vsaj 3 % kmetov, ki zaprosijo za pomoč v skladu z vsako od shem pomoči na površino iz naslovov III, IV in IVa Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003.“
5 % of all farmers applying for aid under the ovine/caprine aid scheme irrespective of whether the aid applications are being submitted as part of the single application or independently; those on-the-spot checks shall also cover at least 5 % of all animals for which aid is applied for; however, where the computerised database for ovine/caprine animals provided for in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 does not offer the level of assurance and implementation necessary for the proper management of the aid schemes involved, the percentage shall be increased to 10 % of the farmers.’;
5 % vseh kmetov, ki zaprosijo za pomoč v skladu s shemami pomoči za ovce/koze, pri čemer ni pomembno, ali so zahtevki za pomoč vloženi kot del enotnega zahtevka ali neodvisno; prav tako zajemajo ti pregledi na kraju samem vsaj 5 % vseh živali, za katere je bila zaprošena pomoč; kadar računalniška zbirka podatkov za ovce/koze iz člena 8 Uredbe (ES) št. 21/2004 ne ponuja ravni zanesljivosti in izvajanja, ki je potrebna za primerno upravljanje vključenih shem pomoči, zajamejo pregledi 10 % kmetov.“
3 % of all farmers whose agricultural parcels are being declared by a producer group applying for hops payments in accordance with Article 15a.’;
3 % vseh kmetov, katerih kmetijska zemljišča prijavlja skupina proizvajalcev, ki vlaga zahtevek za plačila za hmelj v skladu s členom 15a.“
The first subparagraph of paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
prvi pododstavek odstavka 1 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Control samples for on-the-spot checks under this Regulation shall be selected by the competent authority on the basis of a risk analysis and representativeness of the aid applications submitted.
„Pristojni organ izbere na podlagi analize tveganja in reprezentativnosti vloženih zahtevkov za pomoč kontrolne vzorce za preglede na kraju samem v skladu s to uredbo.
The effectiveness of risk analysis shall be assessed and updated on an annual basis:
Vsako leto se oceni in posodobi učinkovitost analize tveganja z:
by establishing the relevance of each risk factor;
določitvijo pomembnosti vsakega dejavnika tveganja;
by comparing the results of the risk based and randomly selected sample referred to in the second subparagraph;
primerjavo rezultatov naključnih vzorcev, izbranih na podlagi tveganja, iz drugega pododstavka;
by taking into account the specific situation in the Member State.’;
upoštevanjem posameznih razmer v državi članici.“
A partial selection of the control sample may, where appropriate, be made before the end of the application period in question, on the basis of available information.
Delni izbor kontrolnega vzorca se lahko, kadar je potrebno, opravi pred koncem zadevnega obdobja za vložitev zahtevka na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij.
The provisional sample shall be completed when all relevant applications are available.’;
Začasni vzorec se dopolni, ko so na voljo vsi ustrezni zahtevki.“
in Article 28(1), point (d) is replaced by the following:
V členu 28(1) se točka (d) nadomesti z naslednjim: