natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, company 2 was found to have provided false information with regard to the ownership of its shares and the privatisation process, thereby hiding significant State interference.
Glede na ugotovitve naj bi družba 2 tudi predložila napačne informacije v zvezi z lastništvom delnic in postopkom privatizacije ter na ta način prikrila občutno vmešavanje države.
As to company 3, there were strong indications that capital used to start the company was obtained from the village-owned and collectively-owned enterprises managed by the current Chairman of the company and the company was not able to explain and demonstrate the origin of the capital.
Za družbo 3 so obstajali tehtni dokazi, da so začetni kapital družbe zagotovile družbe v lasti vasi in v skupni lasti, ki jo je upravljal sedanji direktor družbe; družba ni mogla pojasniti izvora kapitala.
Moreover, all three companies’ accounts were not kept in line with IAS, and signs of serious negligence in the audit of those accounts were found.
Poleg tega nobena od treh družb svojih računovodskih evidenc ni vodila v skladu z MRS, ugotovljena pa je bila tudi velika malomarnost pri njenih revizijah.
Finally, distortions carried over from the non-market economy system were found to affect the costs for both companies, in particular with regard to cost of the land-use rights acquired (companies 1 and 3) or assets transferred during the privatisation (company 2).
Nazadnje je bilo ugotovljeno, da vplivajo izkrivljanja, prenesena iz sistema netržnega gospodarstva, na stroške obeh družb, zlasti na stroške za pridobitev pravic do rabe zemljišča (družbi 1 in 3) oziroma stroške prenosa sredstev med privatizacijo (družba 2).
With regard to the three other cooperating exporting producers it was initially concluded that the companies met all five criteria.
Prvotno je bilo sklenjeno, da izpolnjujejo preostali trije proizvajalci izvozniki vseh pet meril.
However, after the disclosure to the interested parties, which were given an opportunity to comment on the above findings, the Community industry claimed that two of the three exporting producers for which it was proposed to grant MET should be denied MET (hereunder referred to as company 4 and company 5).
Vendar je industrija Skupnosti po seznanitvi zainteresiranih strank, ki so lahko predložile pripombe na zgornje ugotovitve, trdila, da je treba dvema od treh proizvajalcev izvoznikov predlagano odobritev TGO zavrniti (v nadaljevanju „družba 4“ in „družba 5“).
They alleged for company 4 that there was State interference in the management as well as in the financing of the company.
Za družbo 4 je industrija Skupnosti trdila, da se država vmešava v njeno upravljanje in financiranje.
For company 5 the Community industry stated that they had understated their number of employees, and queried the payment of the original capital.
Za družbo 5 pa je industrija Skupnosti trdila, da so navedli premajhno število zaposlenih in da je vprašljivo plačilo osnovnega kapitala.
They also queried the losses made by a related trading company.
Vprašljive naj bi bile tudi izgube povezane trgovske družbe.
With regard to company 4, it was not possible to conclude at this stage whether the allegations constituted sufficient grounds to deny MET.
V tej fazi ni bilo mogoče skleniti, ali domneve v zvezi z družbo 4 zadostujejo za zavrnitev TGO.
Whereas the allegations are considered to be serious, there is at present uncertainty about the facts underlying these allegations.
Argumenti so sicer močni, vendar pa za zdaj obstaja negotovost glede dejstev, na katerih temeljijo ti argumenti.
Further analyses of the information submitted by the company as well as additional investigations are necessary before a final decision is reached.
Za končno odločitev je potrebna nadaljnja proučitev informacij, ki jih je predložila družba, in dodatna preiskava.
In these particular circumstances, in order not to impede the rights of defence of interested parties, it was therefore considered appropriate to grant MET to company 4 at this stage and to continue the investigation regarding its MET claim.
V teh posebnih okoliščinah se je zato zdelo primerno, da se v tej fazi družbi 4 TGO odobri, vendar pa je treba nadaljevati preiskavo v zvezi z zahtevkom za TGO, da ne bi bila kršena pravica do zagovora zainteresiranih strank.
As regards the allegations made against company 5, these were merely assumptions.
Argumenti proti družbi 5 so zgolj domneve.
The Commission verified the information submitted by this exporting producer and concluded that the allegations were not substantiated.
Komisija je preverila informacije, ki jih je predložil ta proizvajalec izvoznik in sklenila, da domneve niso utemeljene.
The Commission's findings as regards this company are thus maintained.
Zato se ugotovitve Komisije v zvezi s to družbo ohranijo.
Following disclosure of the Commission's findings, all three companies denied MET submitted that the determination was incorrect, that they met all five MET criteria and that they should be granted MET as a consequence.
Po razkritju ugotovitev Komisije so vse tri družbe, ki jim je bil TGO zavrnjen, trdile, da je bila odločitev, da so vse družbe izpolnile merila TGO, nepravilna in jim je treba zato TGO odobriti.
In particular, company 1 contended that it had submitted the proof of the payment in cash for the shares to the Commission and denied any State influence on its decision-making process.
Družba 1 je trdila, da je Komisiji predložila dokazila o plačilu delnic v gotovini in zanikala vsakršno vmešavanje države v njeno odločanje.
It also argued that its accounts were kept in line with IAS and that the cost of the land-use right was in line with market values.
Trdila je še, da je svoje računovodske evidence vodila v skladu z MRS in da so stroški za pridobitev pravic do rabe zemljišča ustrezali tržnim vrednostim.
Company 2 contested that membership in the Communist Party of its top management should lead to the conclusion that there is State interference in the company's decision process, and said that it submitted supporting evidence for the payment of the shares during its privatisation process.
Družba 2 je menila, da članstvo najvišjega vodstva v komunistični stranki ne more biti razlog za sklep, da se je država vmešavala v odločitve družbe, ter zatrdila, da je predložila ustrezna dokazila o plačilu delnic v postopku privatizacije.
The company further argued that, despite breaching some of the IAS, its accounts were in line with the Chinese Accounting Standards.
Družba je nadalje trdila, da so njene računovodske evidence kljub kršitvi nekaterih načel MRS v skladu s kitajskimi računovodskimi standardi.
Company 3 stated that the capital used to start the company was sourced from other companies owned by the same shareholder, that the accounts were in line with IAS, and that their land-use right prices were similar to other companies in the same area and at market prices.
Družba 3 je trdila, da so začetni kapital družbe zagotovile družbe, ki so v lasti istega delničarja, da so računovodske evidence v skladu z MRS, cene za pridobitev pravic do rabe zemljišča pa da so tržne in podobne cenam drugih družb na istem območju.
Indeed, company 1 merely alleged that bank statements were not commonly used in China, but it could not give any supporting evidence that the shares for its privatisation were effectively paid for.
Družba 1 je zgolj navedla, da bančni izpiski na Kitajskem niso običajni, vendar pa vseeno ni mogla dokazati, da je delnice za privatizacijo dejansko plačala.
The company did not either contest the fact that the management structure of the company was the same as prior to privatisation nor that the Chairman was a member of the Communist Party.
Družba ni zanikala, da je vodstvo družbe isto kot pred privatizacijo, niti, da je bil direktor član komunistične stranke.
The fact that the main shareholders were not represented in the Board of Directors was also not contested.
Prav tako ni zanikala dejstva, da glavni delničarji niso bili zastopani v upravnem odboru.
Therefore it was found that the company had not sufficiently demonstrated that it was not subject to significant State interference.
Zato je bilo ugotovljeno, da družba ni zadovoljivo dokazala, da se država v njeno poslovanje ni vmešavala.
Furthermore, no new elements were provided to reject the findings and support the claim that accounts complied with IAS and that land-use rights costs were within market conditions.
Poleg tega niso predložili novih navedb, s katerimi bi zavrnili ugotovitve in dokazali trditev, da so bile računovodske evidence v skladu z MRS, stroški za pridobitev pravic do rabe zemljišča pa v skladu s tržnimi pogoji.
Company 2 disputed the conclusion reached by the Commission but did not deny the facts on which they were based.
Družba 2 je nasprotovala sklepu Komisije, ni pa zanikala dejstev, na podlagi katerih je bil ta sprejet.
Concerning the privatisation process and the payment of the shares, the company argued that it provided supporting evidence but did not address the fact that these documents were false, as admitted by the General Manager during the verification visit.
Družba je trdila, da je predložila ustrezna dokazila o postopku privatizacije in plačilu delnic, ni pa omenila dejstva, da so bili ti dokumenti napačni, kar je med preveritvenim obiskom priznal generalni direktor.
The company also confirmed that the key management positions were occupied by members of the Communist Party.
Družba je tudi potrdila, da so bili na ključnih vodstvenih mestih člani komunistične stranke.
Moreover, no new elements were provided to support the claim that accounts complied with IAS, the company's statement only being that they were in line with the Chinese Accounting Standards.
Poleg tega družba ni predložila novih navedb v podporo trditvi, da so bile računovodske evidence v skladu z MRS, navedla je le, da so bile v skladu s kitajskimi računovodskimi standardi.
For company 3, the Commission continued to doubt the origin of the capital of the company.
Komisija je še naprej dvomila o izvoru kapitala družbe 3.
Indeed, company 3 merely stated that the capital was sourced from related companies belonging to the Chairman of company 3 through loans which were repaid within a few months.
Ta je namreč zgolj navedla, da so kapital zagotovile povezane družbe, katerih lastnik je direktor družbe 3, in sicer s posojili, ki jih je družba poplačala v nekaj mesecih.
This new information was not only found to contradict the statements made by representatives of company 3 during the verification at the premises of the company, where no documented evidence was made available for inspection, but is also clearly deficient as it does not provide any indication of the origin of the funds used to repay those loans.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je ta nova informacija v nasprotju z izjavami predstavnikov družbe 3 med preveritvenim obiskom v njihovih prostorih, ko niso predložili pisnih dokazil, ter da je nezadostna, ker ne navaja izvora sredstev, s katerimi so bila posojila poplačana.
The company furthermore restated that its accounts were kept in line with IAS and that the discrepancies identified during the investigation were in fact reconcilable.
Družba je ponovno trdila, da so bile njene računovodske evidence vodene v skladu z MRS, med preiskavo ugotovljena razhajanja pa naj bi služila samo uskladitvi z MRS.
However, it provided only partial information to document the alleged reconciliation, accounting merely for a minor part of the differences found.
Vendar pa je družba predložila le delne dokaze o tem, da naj bi domnevno usklajevanje pomenilo le majhen del ugotovljenih razhajanj.
In any case, this new information was submitted only after the investigation and at such a late stage that it would be impractical to verify it.
Poleg tega so bile nove informacije predložene šele po preiskavi, torej prepozno, da bi bila njihova proučitev še izvedljiva.
Furthermore, the company also did not demonstrate that their low land-use right price was actually a market price.
Družba tudi ni dokazala, da je bila njihova nizka cena za pridobitev pravice do rabe zemljišča dejansko določena v skladu s tržnimi pogoji.
On this basis, MET is granted to three exporting producers:
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega se TGO odobri naslednjim trem proizvajalcem izvoznikom:
Individual treatment (‘IT’)
Individualna obravnava (IO)
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, a countrywide duty, if any, is to be established for countries falling under that Article, except in those cases where companies are able to demonstrate that they meet all criteria set out in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation and are therefore granted individual treatment (‘IT’).
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe se za države, ki jih zajema navedeni člen, uvede dajatev na ravni države, če sploh, razen v primerih, ko lahko družbe dokažejo, da izpolnjujejo vsa merila za individualno obravnavo, določena v členu 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
The exporting producers to which MET could not be granted also claimed IT in the event that they were not granted MET.
Proizvajalci izvozniki, ki jim TGO ni bilo mogoče odobriti, so za primer, če jim TGO ne bi bil odobren, zahtevali tudi IO.
However, the companies’ claim for individual treatment was also rejected as they failed to meet the criteria set out in Article 9(5)(b), namely that export prices and quantities were freely determined and that State interference would not be such as to permit circumvention of measures if individual exporters are given different rates of duty.
Vendar pa je bil zavrnjen tudi zahtevek za individualno obravnavo, ker niso izpolnili merila iz člena 9(5)(b), namreč, da se izvozne cene in količine določajo prosto in da vmešavanje države ni tolikšno, da bi omogočalo izogibanje ukrepom, če se posameznim izvoznikom določijo različne stopnje dajatve.
Determination of normal value for the exporting producers granted MET
Določitev normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim je bil odobren TGO
For the three cooperating exporting producers granted MET, the total volume of domestic sales of the like product was representative as defined in recital 21 above.
Za tri proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim je bil TGO odobren, je bil celoten obseg domače prodaje podobnega izdelka reprezentativen, kot je opredeljeno v uvodni izjavi 21.
For some of the product types normal value was based on prices paid or payable, in the ordinary course of trade, by independent customers in the PRC, as explained in recitals 25 and 26, and for the product types for which the domestic sales were insufficient to be considered representative or they were not made in the ordinary course of trade, normal value was constructed as described in recitals 27 to 30.
Za nekatere vrste izdelkov je normalna vrednost temeljila na cenah, ki so jih plačale ali jih plačujejo neodvisne stranke v LRK v običajnem poteku trgovine, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 25 in 26; za tiste vrste izdelka, za katere domača prodaja ni bila zadostna, da bi se lahko štela za reprezentativno, ali ni bila izvedena v običajnem poteku trgovine, pa je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana tako, kot je opisano v uvodnih izjavah 27 do 30.
In the cases where the normal value had to be constructed, the margins for SG&A expenses and profit referred to in recitals 29 and 30 were based on the actual SG&A and profit made by the exporting producer for its domestic sales, in the ordinary course of trade, of the like product on the domestic market, in accordance with the first sub-paragraph of Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation.
Pri konstruiranju normalne vrednosti so v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 2(6) osnovne uredbe stopnje za PSA-stroške in dobiček iz uvodnih izjav 29 in 30 temeljile na dejanskih PSA-stroških in dobičku proizvajalca izvoznika pri njegovi domači prodaji v običajnem poteku trgovine.
According to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, normal value for the exporting producers not granted MET has to be established on the basis of the domestic prices or constructed normal value in an analogue country.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe mora biti normalna vrednost za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim TGO ni bil odobren, določena na podlagi domačih cen ali konstruirane normalne vrednosti v primerljivi državi.
In the notice of initiation, the Commission indicated its intention to use Japan as an appropriate analogue country for the purpose of establishing normal value and interested parties were invited to comment on this.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku izrazila svoj namen, da uporabi Japonsko kot ustrezno primerljivo državo za določitev normalne vrednosti, in pozvala zainteresirane stranke, da predložijo svoje pripombe v zvezi s tem.
However, no comment was received.
Vendar te niso predložile nobenih pripomb.
All known producers of persulphates in Japan were contacted, but none agreed to cooperate.
Komisija je vzpostavila stik z vsemi znanimi proizvajalci persulfatov, vendar nihče ni želel sodelovati.
The Commission then contacted and sent questionnaires to all known producers of persulphates in the other countries where the Commission was aware that such producers existed, namely India and Turkey.
Nato je Komisija vzpostavila stik še z vsemi znanimi proizvajalci persulfatov iz drugih držav, za katere je vedela, da taki proizvajalci obstajajo, namreč v Indiji in Turčiji, ter jim poslala vprašalnike.
No response was received from the Indian companies contacted but one producer in Turkey replied to the questionnaire.
Indijske družbe se niso odzvale, vprašalnik je izpolnil le en turški proizvajalec.
The Commission then examined whether Turkey was a reasonable choice of analogue country.
Nato je Komisija proučila, ali bi bila Turčija ustrezna primerljiva država.
It was concluded that Turkey, despite having only one producer of the product concerned, was an open market with a low import duty and significant imports from third countries.
Sklenjeno je bilo, da je Turčija kljub temu, da ima le enega proizvajalca zadevnega izdelka, odprt trg z nizko uvozno dajatvijo in znatnim uvozom iz tretjih držav.
Furthermore, the investigation showed no reason, such as excessively high cost of raw materials or energy, to consider that Turkey was not adequate for the purpose of establishing normal value.
S preiskavo tudi ni bilo ugotovljeno, da bi bila Turčija neprimerna za določitev normalne vrednosti, denimo zaradi izredno visokih stroškov surovin ali energije.
The data submitted in the cooperating Turkish producer's reply was verified on the spot and was found to be reliable information on which a normal value could be based.
Podatki, ki jih je sodelujoči turški proizvajalec navedel v vprašalniku, so bili preverjeni na kraju samem in ugotovljeno je bilo, da so zanesljivi in primerni za določitev normalne vrednosti.
It is therefore provisionally concluded that Turkey is an appropriate and reasonable analogue country in accordance with Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se začasno sklene, da je Turčija ustrezna in smiselna primerljiva država v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, normal value for the exporting producers not granted MET was established on the basis of verified information received from the producer in the analogue country, i.e. on the basis of prices paid or payable on the Turkish market for comparable product types, in accordance with the methodology set out above.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe je bila normalna vrednost za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim TGO ni bil odobren, določena na podlagi preverjenih informacij, ki jih je predložil proizvajalec iz primerljive države, tj. na podlagi cen, ki so se plačevale ali se plačujejo na turškem trgu za primerljive vrste izdelka, v skladu z zgoraj navedeno metodologijo.
Since sales on the domestic market to unrelated customers were representative and overall profitable, normal value was established on the basis of all prices paid or payable on the Turkish market for comparable product types, for sales in the ordinary course of trade as described in recitals 25 and 26.
Ker je bila prodaja nepovezanim strankam na domačem trgu reprezentativna in na splošno dobičkonosna, je bila normalna vrednost določena na podlagi vseh cen, ki so se na turškem trgu plačale ali se plačujejo za primerljive vrste izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovine, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 25 in 26.
All cooperating exporting producers made export sales to the Community either directly to independent customers in the Community; or through related or unrelated companies located in the PRC, in Hong Kong or in the Community.
Vsi proizvajalci izvozniki so v Skupnost izvažali bodisi neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti ali prek povezanih oziroma nepovezanih družb v LRK, Hongkongu ali Skupnosti.
Where the product concerned was directly exported to independent customers in the Community, the export prices were based on the prices actually paid or payable for the product concerned, in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Kadar je bil zadevni izdelek izvožen neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti, so bile v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe izvozne cene določene na podlagi cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo za zadevni izdelek.
Where sales were made via a related company in the Community the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Kadar je prodaja potekala prek povezane družbe v Skupnosti, je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
Where sales were made via a related company outside the Community the export price was established on the basis of the method set out in recital 33.
Kadar je prodaja potekala prek povezane družbe izven Skupnosti, je bila izvozna cena določena na podlagi metode iz uvodne izjave 33.
Adjustments were made, where appropriate, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, in respect of transport, insurance, handling and ancillary costs, packing, credit, bank charges and commissions were granted in all cases where they were found to be reasonable, accurate and supported by verified evidence.
V skladu s členom 2(10) so bile prilagoditve v zvezi s stroški prevoza, zavarovanja, manipulativnimi in drugimi tozadevnimi stroški, stroški pakiranja, kredita in bančnimi stroški ter provizijami po potrebi opravljene v vseh primerih, kjer je bilo ugotovljeno, da so smiselne, točne in podprte z dokazi.
For the sales channelled through related trading companies, an adjustment was applied in accordance with Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation, where these companies have been shown to perform functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis.
Za prodajo prek povezanih trgovinskih družb je bila uporabljena prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) osnovne uredbe, če so te družbe opravljale svojo dejavnost podobno kot zastopnik, ki dela na podlagi provizije.
In this respect, the allocation of SG&A expenditure provided by the related company was found to be reliable and this adjustment was based on that amount of SG&A expenses plus a profit margin of 5 %, being a reasonable profit margin in the absence of any meaningful data from cooperating unrelated importers or traders in the Community.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so podatki povezane družbe o porazdelitvi PSA-stroškov zanesljivi, zato je ta prilagoditev temeljila na navedenem znesku PSA-stroškov in 5-odstotni stopnji dobička, kar je primerna stopnja dobička, če sodelujoči nepovezani uvozniki ali trgovci v Skupnosti ne predložijo ustreznejših podatkov.
The comparison between the normal value and the export price showed that for two of the three exporters concerned the dumping margin was below 2 %, i.e. de minimis.
Primerjava med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno je pokazala, da je bila pri dveh od treh zadevnih izvoznikov stopnja dampinga nižja od 2 %, tj. de minimis.
The dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the cif import price at the Community border, duty unpaid, are thus provisionally the following:
Stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek uvozne cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, so začasno naslednje: