natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
derogating from certain provisions of Decision 2006/923/EC on a Community financial contribution for 2006 and 2007 to cover expenditure incurred by Portugal for the purpose of combating Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner et Buhrer) Nickle et al. (pinewood nematode)
o odstopanju od nekaterih določb Odločbe 2006/923/ES o finančnem prispevku Skupnosti za leti 2006 in 2007 za kritje izdatkov, ki so nastali na Portugalskem, za boj proti borovi ogorčici Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner et Buhrer) Nickle et al.
(notified under document number C(2008) 1444)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 1444)
Having regard to Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community [1], and in particular Article 23(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2000/29/ES z dne 8. maja 2000 o varstvenih ukrepih proti vnosu organizmov, škodljivih za rastline ali rastlinske proizvode, v Skupnost in proti njihovemu širjenju v Skupnosti [1] ter zlasti člena 23(6) Direktive,
Commission Decision 2006/923/EC [2] approved a financial contribution from the Community for a programme of measures introduced by Portugal aiming in 2006 and 2007 at controlling the spread of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner et Buhrer) Nickle et al. (pinewood nematode) to other Member States.
Odločba Komisije 2006/923/ES [2] je drugim državam članicam odobrila finančni prispevek Skupnosti za program ukrepov, ki jih je uvedla Portugalska za nadzor nad širjenjem borove ogorčice Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner et Buhrer) Nickle et al. za leti 2006 in 2007.
The measures consisted of the creation of a barrier free from all host trees of the pinewood nematode vector, hereinafter the ‘clear cut belt’.
Ukrepi so zajemali vzpostavitev ovire brez dreves gostiteljev vektorja borove ogorčice, v nadaljnjem besedilu „golosek“.
Since the adoption of Decision 2006/923/EC, Portugal has faced several adverse and exceptional circumstances, leading to a delay in the execution of the measures.
Od sprejetja Odločbe 2006/923/ES se je Portugalska soočala z različnimi neugodnimi in izrednimi okoliščinami, ki so podaljšale izvedbo ukrepov.
Those circumstances were explained in a letter from Portugal to the Commission dated 28 September 2007.
Portugalska je navedene okoliščine pojasnila v dopisu Komisiji z dne 28. septembra 2007.
In particular, whilst the initial programme was based on an estimate of 700000 pine trees to be felled, it became necessary to fell 980000 in total.
Medtem ko je bil na začetku programa načrtovan posek 700000 borov, pa se izkazalo, da je bilo nujno posekati skupno 980000 dreves.
In addition, 3700000 young pine trees had also to be eliminated.
Poleg tega je bilo treba uničiti tudi 3700000 mladih borov.
The Portuguese authorities explained the difference in the number of trees by the fact that the sole data available at that time, the national forest inventory from 1995, appeared to be outdated and underestimated young trees, isolated trees and trees located in broadleaf dominated mixed stands.
Portugalski organi so pojasnili razliko v številu dreves z dejstvom, da je bil nacionalni seznam gozdov iz leta 1995 kot edini podatek takrat na voljo verjetno zastarel, število mladih dreves, posameznih dreves ter dreves v mešanih gozdovih s prevladujočimi listavci pa zato podcenjeno.
Notwithstanding the adverse circumstances, the Commission has verified by its missions in Portugal that the Portuguese authorities were able to meet the objectives laid down in Article 1 of Decision 2006/923/EC in an appropriate way.
Ne glede na neugodne okoliščine je Komisija s svojo misijo na Portugalskem preverila, ali so portugalski organi uspeli ustrezno uresničiti cilje iz člena 1 Odločbe 2006/923/ES.
Inevitably the cumulative delays prevented them fully delivering the expected results within the strict deadline laid down in the Decision for the completion of the measures.
Zamude, ki so se kopičile, so neizogibno preprečile, da se v celoti dosežejo pričakovani rezultati v strogem roku, ki ga za izvedbo ukrepov določa Odločba.
Nevertheless, the delays were not such as to prevent the measures from being deployed to their full effect and, due to the weather conditions in spring 2007 in Portugal, not favourable to the flying of the insect vector of the pinewood nematode, did not result in an increased phytosanitary risk.
Vendar zamude niso preprečile celovitega učinka ukrepov, zaradi vremenskih razmer pomladi 2007 na Portugalskem, ki niso bile ugodne za let vektorja borove ogorčice, pa niso povzročile povečanega fitosanitarnega tveganja.
Decision 2006/923/EC laid down penalties, in the form of progressive reductions of the Community financing, in case of non-implementation or late implementation of the measures.
Odločba 2006/923/ES določa kazni v obliki postopnega zmanjševanja financiranja Skupnosti v primeru neizvajanja ali prepoznega izvajanja ukrepov.
The application of such reductions and sanctions would be disproportionate given the exceptional circumstances.
Glede na izjemne okoliščine bi bila uporaba takih zmanjšanj in sankcij nesorazmerna.
The documentation to be provided by Portugal has to be such that it enables the Commission to conclude that the conditions for the payment of the balance of the Community financial contribution laid down in Decision 2006/923/EC are met.
Dokumentacija, ki jo mora predložiti Portugalska, mora Komisiji omogočiti sklep, da so pogoji za plačilo preostanka finančnega prispevka Skupnosti iz Odločbe 2006/923/ES izpolnjeni.
As the exceptional circumstances faced by Portugal have also delayed the payments by Portugal to the private companies having executed the clear cut belt, the deadline for submitting the appropriate documentation should be extended.
Ker je Portugalska zaradi izjemnih okoliščin zamujala tudi s plačili zasebnim podjetjem, ki so izvedla posek, je treba podaljšati rok za predložitev ustrezne dokumentacije.
By way of derogation from Article 4 of Decision 2006/923/EC, the balance of the Community financial contribution referred to in Article 2 of that Decision shall be paid once the following conditions have been satisfied:
Z odstopanjem od člena 4 Odločbe 2006/923/ES se izvede plačilo preostanka finančnega prispevka Skupnosti iz člena 2 navedene odločbe, ko bodo izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji:
the measures necessary to the creation of a clear-cut belt as an area free from pinewood nematode vector hosts have been implemented by Portugal in an acceptable way and meet the objectives referred to in Article 1 of Decision 2006/923/EC;
Portugalska izvede ukrepe, potrebne za posek območja brez gostiteljev vektorjev borove ogorčice, na sprejemljiv način in izpolni cilje iz člena 1 Odločbe 2006/923/ES;
Portugal has submitted to the Commission a financial report, including registered invoices or receipts, and a final technical report as provided for in Article 5 of Decision 2006/923/EC.
Portugalska Komisiji predloži finančno poročilo, vključno z evidentiranimi računi ali potrdili ter končno tehnično poročilo, kot je določeno v členu 5 Odločbe 2006/923/ES.
Article 7 of Decision 2006/923/EC shall not apply if the Commission is satisfied, on the basis of evidence provided by Portugal, that delays in the implementation of the measures have not affected the effectiveness of the measures.
Člen 7 Odločbe 2006/923/ES se ne uporablja, če se Komisija na podlagi dokazil Portugalske prepriča, da zamude pri izvajanju ukrepov niso zmanjšale njihove učinkovitosti.
Done at Brussels, 21 April 2008.
V Bruslju, 21. aprila 2008
OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 42.
UL L 354, 14.12.2006, str. 42.
amending the Decision of the Executive Committee set up by the 1990 Schengen Convention, amending the Financial Regulation on the costs of installing and operating the technical support function for the Schengen Information System (C.SIS)
o spremembi Sklepa Izvršnega odbora, ustanovljenega s Schengensko konvencijo iz leta 1990 o spremembi Finančne uredbe o stroških postavitve in delovanja za tehnični podporni del schengenskega informacijskega sistema (C.SIS)
Having regard to Article 119 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders (the 1990 Schengen Convention) [1],
ob upoštevanju določb člena 119 Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma z dne 14. junija 1985 med vladami držav Gospodarske unije Beneluks, Zvezne republike Nemčije in Francoske republike o postopni odpravi kontrol na skupnih mejah (Schengenska konvencija iz leta 1990) [1],
The provisions of Article 119 of the 1990 Schengen Convention provide that the costs arising from the installation and operation of C.SIS, referred to in the provisions of Article 92(3), shall be borne jointly by the Contracting Parties.
V določbah člena 119 Schengenske konvencije iz leta 1990 je določeno, da stroški postavitve in delovanja C.SIS, navedeni v določbah člena 92(3), bremenijo vse pogodbenice.
The financial obligations arising from the installation and operation of the C.SIS are regulated by a specific Financial Regulation, as modified by the Decision of the Schengen Executive Committee of 15 December 1997 amending the Financial Regulation on C.SIS [2] (hereinafter C.SIS Financial Regulation).
Finančne obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz postavitve in delovanja C.SIS, so urejene v posebni Finančni uredbi, kakor je bila spremenjena s Sklepom schengenskega Izvršnega odbora z dne 15. decembra 1997 o spremembi finančne uredbe o C.SIS [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Finančna uredba o C.SIS“).
The C.SIS Financial Regulation applies to Denmark, Finland and Sweden, and to Iceland and Norway by virtue of Council Decision 2000/777/EC [3], as well as to the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic by virtue of Council Decision 2007/471/EC [4].
Finančna uredba o C.SIS se na podlagi Sklepa Sveta 2000/777/ES [3] uporablja za Dansko, Finsko in Švedsko ter za Islandijo in Norveško, na podlagi Sklepa Sveta 2007/471/ES [4] pa tudi za Češko republiko, Republiko Estonijo, Republiko Latvijo, Republiko Litvo, Republiko Madžarsko, Republiko Malto, Republiko Poljsko, Republiko Slovenijo in Slovaško republiko.
The Swiss Confederation is to participate in the provisions of the Schengen acquis related to the Schengen Information System from a date to be set by the Council in accordance with Article 15(1) of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [5] (hereinafter the Agreement).
Švicarska konfederacija bo sodelovala pri določbah schengenskega pravnega reda, povezanih s schengenskim informacijskim sistemom, od datuma, ki ga bo določil Svet v skladu s členom 15(1) Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [5] (v nadaljevanju „Sporazum“).
From that date onwards the Swiss Confederation should participate in the C.SIS Financial Regulation.
Od tega datuma naprej bi morala Švicarska konfederacija sodelovati pri Finančni uredbi o C.SIS.
It is reasonable that the Swiss Confederation contributes to historical C.SIS costs.
Primerno je, da Švicarska konfederacija prispeva k stroškom C.SIS, nastalim v preteklosti.
However, since the Agreement was signed on 26 October 2004, it is considered appropriate that it should contribute historical costs in relation to the installation of the C.SIS from 1 January 2005.
Ker pa je Sporazum bil podpisan 26. oktobra 2004, se zdi primerno, da k stroškom, nastalim v preteklosti v zvezi s postavitvijo C.SIS, prispeva od 1. januarja 2005.
It is also considered reasonable that it contribute to operating costs from 1 January 2008.
Prav tako se zdi primerno, da k stroškom delovanja prispeva od 1. januarja 2008.
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters’ association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [6] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point G, of Council Decision 1999/437/EC [7] on certain arrangements for the application of that Agreement.
Kar zadeva Islandijo in Norveško, ta sklep predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma, sklenjenega med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško, v zvezi s pridružitvijo teh dveh držav k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [6], ki sodijo na področje iz člena 1(G) Sklepa 1999/437/ES [7] o nekaterih izvedbenih predpisih za uporabo tega sporazuma.
As regards Switzerland, this Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement, which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point G, of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decisions 2008/146/EC [8] and 2008/149/JHA [9].
Kar zadeva Švico, ta sklep predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma, ki sodijo na področje iz člena 1(G) Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES v povezavi s členom 3 sklepov 2008/146/ES [8] in 2008/149/PNZ [9].
As regards Liechtenstein, this Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Protocol signed between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement, which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point G, of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decisions 2008/261/EC [10] and 2008/262/JHA [11].
Kar zadeva Lihtenštajn, ta sklep predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Protokola, podpisanega med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu, ki sodijo na področje iz člena 1(G) Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES v povezavi s členom 3 sklepov Sveta 2008/261/ES [10] in 2008/262/PNZ [11].
The United Kingdom is taking part in this Decision, in accordance with Article 5 of the Protocol integrating the Schengen acquis into the framework of the European Union annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, and Article 8(2) of Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [12].
Združeno kraljestvo se pridružuje temu sklepu v skladu s členom 5 Protokola o vključitvi schengenskega pravnega reda v okvir Evropske unije, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, ter s členom 8(2) Sklepa Sveta 2000/365/ES z dne 29. maja 2000 o prošnji Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [12].
Ireland is taking part in this Decision, in accordance with Article 5 of the Protocol integrating the Schengen acquis into the framework of the European Union annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, and Article 6(2) of Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland's request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [13].
Irska se pridružuje temu sklepu v skladu s členom 5 Protokola o vključitvi schengenskega pravnega reda v okvir Evropske unije, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, ter s členom 6(2) Sklepa Sveta 2002/192/ES z dne 28. februarja 2002 o prošnji Irske za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [13].
As regards the Republic of Cyprus, this Decision constitutes an act building on the Schengen acquis or otherwise related to it within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the 2003 Act of Accession.
Kar zadeva Republiko Ciper, ta sklep predstavlja predpis, temelječ na schengenskem pravnem redu ali kako drugače z njim povezan v smislu člena 3(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2003.
This Decision constitutes an act building on the Schengen acquis or otherwise related to it within the meaning of Article 4(2) of the 2005 Act of Accession,
Ta sklep predstavlja predpis, temelječ na schengenskem pravnem redu ali kako drugače z njim povezan v smislu člena 4(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2005 –
In Title I, point 3 of the C.SIS Financial Regulation, the following indent shall be added:
V točki 3 naslova I Finančne uredbe o C.SIS se doda naslednja alinea:
in the case of the Swiss Confederation, the contribution shall only be calculated on the basis of the costs incurred for the installation of the C.SIS from 1 January 2005.
kar zadeva Švicarsko konfederacijo, se ta prispevek izračuna le na podlagi stroškov, nastalih za postavitev C. SIS po 1. januarju 2005.
The Swiss Confederation shall also contribute to the operating costs of the C.SIS from 1 January 2008.’
Švicarska konfederacija prispeva tudi sredstva za stroške delovanja C.SIS od 1. januarja 2008.“
OJ L 309, 9.12.2000, p. 24.
UL L 309, 9.12.2000, str. 24.
Council Decision of 28 January 2008 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis (OJ L 53, 27.2.2008, p. 1).
Sklep Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2008 o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda v imenu Evropske skupnosti (UL L 53, 27.2.2008, str. 1).
Council Decision of 28 January 2008 on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis (OJ L 53, 27.2.2008, p. 50).
Sklep Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2008 o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda v imenu Evropske unije (UL L 53, 27.2.2008, str. 50).
OJ L 83, 26.3.2008. p. 3.
UL L 83, 26.3.2008, str. 3.
OJ L 83, 26.3.2008. p. 5.
UL L 83, 26.3.2008, str. 5.
requiring Member States to ensure that magnetic toys placed or made available on the market display a warning about the health and safety risks they pose
o zahtevi, da države članice zagotovijo, da imajo magnetne igrače, ki se dajejo na trg ali se dajo na voljo na trgu, opozorilo glede tveganj za zdravje in varnost, ki jih povzročajo
(notified under document number C(2008) 1484)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 1484)
Having consulted the Member States,
po posvetovanju z državami članicami,
Pursuant to Directive 2001/95/EC and Council Directive 88/378/EEC of 3 May 1988 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning the safety of toys [2], as amended by Council Directive 93/68/EEC [3], producers are obliged to place only safe toys on the market.
V skladu z Direktivo 2001/95/ES in Direktivo Sveta 88/378/EGS z dne 3. maja 1988 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic v zvezi z varnostjo igrač [2], kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo Sveta 93/68/EGS [3], so proizvajalci dolžni dajati v promet le varne igrače.
Directive 88/378/EEC lays down the essential safety requirements that toys must meet to ensure the safety objectives of the Directive.
Direktiva 88/378/EGS določa bistvene varnostne zahteve, ki jih morajo igrače izpolnjevati za zagotavljanje ciljev glede varnosti iz Direktive.
In addition, the Directive provides that, in order to facilitate the proof of conformity with the essential safety requirements, European standards concerning the design and composition of toys should be drawn up by the standardisation bodies.
Poleg tega Direktiva določa, da morajo organi za standardizacijo za lažje dokazovanje usklajenosti z bistvenimi varnostnimi zahtevami pripraviti evropske standarde o obliki in sestavi igrač.
Currently the risk posed by magnets is covered by the general safety requirement of Directive 88/378/EEC, but the Directive does not lay down particular safety requirements dealing with the risk posed by magnets.
Trenutno je tveganje v zvezi z magneti zajeto v splošnih varnostnih zahtevah Direktive 88/378/EGS, vendar Direktiva ne določa posebnih varnostnih zahtev, ki obravnavajo tveganje v zvezi z magneti.
The European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) issued European standard EN 71-1:2005 ‘Safety of toys — Part I: mechanical and physical properties’ which is a consolidated version of harmonised standard EN 71-1:1998 and its 11 amendments.
Evropski odbor za standardizacijo (CEN) je objavil evropski standard EN 71-1:2005 „Varnost igrač – del I: mehanske in fizikalne lastnosti“, ki je prečiščeno besedilo harmoniziranega standarda EN 71-1:1998 in njegovih 11 sprememb.
Toys complying with the standard are presumed to be in conformity with the essential requirements of Directive 88/378/EEC, as far as the specific requirements covered by the standard are concerned.
Za igrače, ki so v skladu s standardom, se predvideva, da so glede posebnih zahtev, ki jih zajema standard, v skladu z bistvenimi zahtevami Direktive 88/378/EGS.
The standard does not currently contain technical requirements for magnetic toys.
Standard trenutno ne vključuje tehničnih zahtev za magnetne igrače.
In accordance with Article 8(2)(a) of Directive 88/378/EEC, producers must have recourse to EC type-examination when a harmonised standard does not cover all the risks that a toy may present.
V skladu s členom 8(2)(a) Direktive 88/378/EGS morajo proizvajalci pridobiti ES pregled tipa, če harmonizirani standard ne zajema vseh tveganj v zvezi z igračo.
In order to address the specific risks of magnetic toys, on 25 May 2007 the Commission gave a mandate to CEN [4], in accordance with Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations [5], to revise the European standard EN 71-1:2005 within 24 months.
Za obravnavo posebnih tveganj magnetnih igrač je Komisija 25. maja 2007 v skladu z Direktivo 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. junija 1998 o določitvi postopka za zbiranje informacij na področju tehničnih standardov in tehničnih predpisov [4] CEN [5] podelila mandat za revizijo evropskega standarda EN 71-1:2005 v roku 24 mesecev.
Pending the drawing up and entry into force of the revised standard, it is necessary to address immediately the risks posed by magnetic toys in order to minimise further accidents to children caused by these toys by improving the knowledge of the risks.
Do priprave in začetka veljavnosti revidiranega standarda je treba nemudoma obravnavati tveganja v zvezi z magnetnimi igračami z izboljšanjem znanja o tveganjih, da se čim bolj zmanjša število nadaljnjih nesreč pri otrocih, ki jih povzročajo te igrače.
In addition to Directive 88/378/EEC, the safety of toys is covered by Directive 2001/95/EC which sets out the market surveillance framework for consumer products.
Poleg Direktive 88/378/EGS je varnost igrač pokrita z Direktivo 2001/95/ES, ki določa okvir nadzora trga za potrošniške proizvode.