natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ikegami Tsushinki Co. Ltd: 200,3 % (TARIC additional code: 8741),
Ikegami Tsushinki Co. Ltd: 200,3 % (dodatna oznaka TARIC 8741),
Sony Corporation: 108,3 % (TARIC additional code: 8742),
Sony Corporation: 108,3 % (dodatna oznaka TARIC 8742),
Hitachi Denshi Ltd: 52,7 % (TARIC additional code: 8743).
Hitachi Denshi Ltd: 52,7 % (dodatna oznaka TARIC 8743).
Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2117/2005 (OJ L 340, 23.12.2005, p. 17).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2117/2005 (UL L 340, 23.12.2005, str. 17).
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1909/2006 (OJ L 365, 21.12.2006, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1909/2006 (UL L 365, 21.12.2006, str. 1).
OJ C 309, 15.12.2004, p. 2.
UL C 309, 15.12.2004, str. 2.
OJ C 117, 18.5.2006, p. 8.
UL C 117, 18.5.2006, str. 8.
Models exempted under the condition that the corresponding triax system or triax-adapter is not sold on the EC market.
Modeli, ki so bili izvzeti pod pogojem, da se ustrezni sistem triax ali adapter triax ne prodajata na trgu ES.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1911/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1911/2006
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of solutions of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Algeria, Belarus, Russia and Ukraine following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz raztopin sečnine in amonijevega nitrata s poreklom iz Alžirije, Belorusije, Rusije in Ukrajine po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation) and in particular Article 11(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 11(2) Uredbe,
On 23 September 2000 the Council imposed, by Regulation (EC) No 1995/2000 [2], definitive anti-dumping measures on imports of solutions of urea and ammonium nitrate (UAN) originating in Algeria, Belarus, Russia, Ukraine and Lithuania.
Svet je 23. septembra 2000 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1995/2000 [2] uvedel dokončne protidampinške ukrepe za uvoz raztopin sečnine in amonijevega nitrata („SAN“) s poreklom iz Alžirije, Belorusije, Rusije, Ukrajine in Litve.
The measures imposed on imports of UAN originating in Lithuania lapsed after enlargement of the European Union on 1 May 2004.
Ukrepi, uvedeni za uvoz SAN iz Litve, so prenehali veljati po širitvi Evropske unije 1. maja 2004.
The investigation that led to these measures will be referred to as ‘the original investigation’.
Preiskava, ki je privedla do teh ukrepov, bo opredeljena kot „prvotna preiskava“.
The measures applying to these imports consisted of specific duties, except for imports from one Algerian exporting producer from which an undertaking was accepted.
Ukrepi, ki se uporabljajo za ta uvoz, so vključevali posebne dajatve, razen v primeru uvoza od enega alžirskega proizvajalca izvoznika, katerega zaveza je bila sprejeta.
On 20 June 2005, a request for an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, was lodged following the publication of a notice of impending expiry on 17 December 2004 [3].
Po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku dne 17. decembra 2004 [3], je bil 20. junija 2005 v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe vložen zahtevek za pregled.
This request was lodged by the European Fertiliser Manufacturers Association (EFMA) (the applicant) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50 % of the total Community production of UAN.
Ta zahtevek je vložilo Evropsko združenje proizvajalcev umetnih gnojil („vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje SAN v Skupnosti.
The applicant alleged and provided sufficient prima facie evidence that there is a likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury to the Community industry with regard to imports of UAN originating in Algeria, Belarus, Russia and Ukraine (the countries concerned).
Vložnik je trdil in predložil zadostne prima facie dokaze o tem, da obstaja verjetnost nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga glede uvoza SAN s poreklom iz Alžirije, Belorusije, Rusije in Ukrajine („zadevne države“) ter verjetnost nadaljevanja ali ponovnega pojava škode za industrijo Skupnosti.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced on 22 September 2005, by a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [4], the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po posvetu s svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov, in zato 22. septembra 2005 z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [4], napovedala pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The investigation of continuation or recurrence of dumping covered the period from 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005 (review investigation period or RIP).
Preiskava v zvezi z nadaljevanjem ali ponovitvijo dampinga je zajemala obdobje od 1. julija 2004 do 30. junija 2005 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of a likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 2002 to the end of the review investigation period (period considered).
Proučevanje trendov, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovnega pojava škode, je zajemalo obdobje od leta 2002 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („obravnavano obdobje“).
The Commission officially advised the exporting producers, importers and users known to be concerned and their associations, the representatives of the exporting countries, the complainant and the Community producers of the initiation of the expiry review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa uradno obvestila proizvajalce izvoznike, uvoznike in uporabnike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter njihova združenja, predstavnike držav izvoznic, pritožnika in proizvajalce Skupnosti.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane stranke so imele možnost pisno izraziti svoje stališče in zahtevati zaslišanje v roku, ki je bil naveden v obvestilu o začetku.
All interested parties, who so requested and showed that there were particular reasons why they should be heard, were granted a hearing.
Vsem zainteresiranim strankam, ki so vložile ustrezni zahtevek in dokazale, da obstajajo razlogi, da se jih zasliši, je bilo odobreno zaslišanje.
In view of the large number of Community producers and of importers in the Community not related to an exporting producer in one of the countries concerned, it was considered appropriate, in conformity with Article 17 of the basic Regulation, to examine whether sampling should be used.
Glede na veliko število proizvajalcev in uvoznikov v Skupnosti, ki niso povezani s proizvajalcem izvoznikom v eni od zadevnih držav, se je štelo za primerno, da se v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe prouči, ali je treba uporabiti vzorčenje.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would indeed be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the above parties were requested, pursuant to Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, to make themselves known within 15 days of the initiation of the investigation and to provide the Commission with the information requested in the notice of initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in, če je, izbrala vzorec, so se morale zadevne stranke v skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe javiti Komisiji v 15 dneh od začetka preiskave in ji posredovati podatke, ki se zahtevajo v obvestilu o začetku.
After examination of the information submitted, and given the high number of Community producers which indicated their willingness to cooperate, it was decided that sampling was necessary with regard to Community producers.
Po proučitvi predloženih informacij in ob upoštevanju velikega števila proizvajalcev Skupnosti, ki so bili pripravljeni sodelovati, je bilo odločeno, da je potrebno vzorčenje v zvezi s proizvajalci Skupnosti.
Given the fact that only one importer provided the information requested in the notice of initiation and expressed its willingness to further cooperate with the Commission services, it was decided that sampling was not necessary with regard to importers.
Ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je le eden od uvoznikov posredoval podatke, ki se zahtevajo v obvestilu o začetku, in bil pripravljen še naprej sodelovati s službami Komisije, je bilo odločeno, da vzorčenje v zvezi z uvozniki ni potrebno.
Questionnaires were sent to the four sampled Community producers and to all known exporting producers.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani štirim vzorčenim proizvajalcem Skupnosti in vsem znanim proizvajalcem izvoznikom.
Replies to the questionnaires were received from the four sampled Community producers and six exporting producers in the countries concerned, as well as from their related traders.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike so poslali štirje vzorčeni proizvajalci Skupnosti ter šest proizvajalcev izvoznikov v zadevnih državah in tudi njihovi povezani trgovci.
One producer in the analogue country provided a complete questionnaire reply.
Proizvajalec iz primerljive države je predložil v celoti izpolnjen vprašalnik.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for a determination of the likely continuation or recurrence of dumping and resulting injury and of the Community interest.
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za ugotovitev verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovnega pojava dampinga, posledične škode in interesa Skupnosti.
Exporting producer in Russia
proizvajalec izvoznik v Rusiji
JSC Mineral and Chemical Company (Eurochem), Moscow, Russia, and its two related manufacturing companies:
JSC Mineral and Chemical Company (Eurochem), Moskva, Rusija, in njeni povezani proizvodni družbi:
PJSC Azot (NAK Azot), Novomoskovsk, Russia, and
PJSC Azot (NAK Azot), Novomoskovsk, Rusija, in
PJSC Nevinnomyssky Azot (Nevinka Azot), Nevinnomyssk, Russia;
PJSC Nevinnomyssky Azot (Nevinka Azot), Nevinnomyssk, Rusija;
Related trader to Eurochem
povezani trgovec Eurochem
Eurochem Trading GmbH, Zug, Switzerland – (Eurochem Trading);
Eurochem Trading GmbH, Zug, Švica – (Eurochem Trading);
Related trader to the Ukrainian producer Stirol
povezani trgovec ukrajinskega proizvajalca Stirol
Sampled Community producers
vzorčeni proizvajalci Skupnosti
Grande Paroisse SA, Paris, France,
Grande Paroisse SA, Pariz, Francija,
SKW Stickstoffwerke Piesteritz GmbH, Wittenberg, Germany,
SKW Stickstoffwerke Piesteritz GmbH, Wittenberg, Nemčija,
Yara SA, Brussels, Belgium and its related producer Yara Sluiskil BV, Sluiskil, The Netherlands.
Yara SA, Bruselj, Belgija, in povezani proizvajalec Yara Sluiskil BV, Sluiskil, Nizozemska.
Ten Community producers properly completed the sampling form within the deadline and formally agreed to cooperate further in the investigation.
Deset proizvajalcev Skupnosti je obrazec za vzorčenje pravilno izpolnilo v roku in se uradno strinjalo, da bodo pri preiskavi še naprej sodelovali.
With regard to those 10 Community producers, the Commission selected, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation, a sample based on the largest representative volume of production and sales of UAN in the Community which can reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Komisija je v zvezi z navedenimi desetimi proizvajalci Skupnosti v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe izbrala vzorec na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega proizvodnje in prodaje SAN v Skupnosti, ki ga je mogoče ustrezno preiskati v razpoložljivem času.
The four sampled Community producers accounted for 63 % of the total Community industry production during the RIP, whilst the above 10 Community producers accounted for 75 % of the total Community production during the RIP.
Štirje vzorčeni proizvajalci Skupnosti so predstavljali 63 % celotne proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti v OPP, deset zgoraj omenjenih proizvajalcev Skupnosti pa 75 % celotne proizvodnje Skupnosti v OPP.
In accordance with Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, the parties concerned were consulted on the sample chosen and raised no objection thereto.
Komisija se je v skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe posvetovala z zadevnimi strankami, ki pa niso imele pripomb.
The product concerned is the same as in the original investigation, i.e. a solution of urea and ammonium nitrate, a liquid fertiliser commonly used in agriculture, originating in the countries concerned.
Zadevni izdelek je izdelek iz prvotne preiskave, tj. raztopina sečnine in amonijevega nitrata, tekoče gnojilo, ki se pogosto uporablja v kmetijstvu, s poreklom iz zadevnih držav.
It consists of a mixture of urea, ammonium nitrate and water.
Sestavljen je iz mešanice sečnine, amonijevega nitrata in vode.
The nitrogen (N) content is the most significant ‘feature’ of the product, and it can vary between 28 % and 32 %.
Vsebnost dušika (N) je najpomembnejša „značilnost“ izdelka in lahko niha med 28 % in 32 %.
Such variation can be obtained by adding more or less water to the solution.
Nihanje nastane zaradi dodajanja več ali manj vode v raztopino.
Most of the imported UAN was 32 % N, which is more concentrated, and therefore cheaper to ship.
Večina uvoženega SAN je vsebovala 32 % N, kar je pomenilo bolj koncentrirano raztopino in zato cenejši prevoz.
However, whatever their nitrogen content, all solutions of urea and ammonium nitrate are considered to have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and therefore constitute a single product for the purpose of this investigation.
Vseeno se ne glede na vsebnost dušika šteje, da imajo vse raztopine sečnine in amonijevega nitrata enake fizikalne in kemijske lastnosti, zato se v tej preiskavi štejejo za en izdelek.
The product concerned falls within CN code 31028000.
Zadevni izdelek spada pod oznako KN 31028000.
As established in the original investigation, this review investigation confirmed that UAN is a pure commodity product, and its quality and basic physical characteristics are identical whatever the country of origin.
Kot je pokazala prvotna preiskava, je ta preiskava v zvezi s pregledom potrdila, da je SAN čist izdelek, njegova kakovost in osnovne fizikalne lastnosti pa so enake ne glede na državo porekla.
The product concerned and the products manufactured and sold by the exporting producers on the domestic market in the countries concerned, as well as those manufactured and sold by the Community producers on the Community market and by the producer in the analogue country on the domestic market of the analogue country have thus been found to have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and essentially the same uses and are therefore considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Za zadevni izdelek in izdelke, ki jih proizvajajo in prodajajo proizvajalci izvozniki na domačem trgu zadevnih držav, pa tudi izdelke, ki jih proizvajajo in prodajajo proizvajalci Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti in proizvajalec primerljive države na domačem trgu te države, je bilo tako ugotovljeno, da imajo enake osnovne fizikalne in kemijske lastnosti ter enako uporabo, zato se v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe štejejo za podobne izdelke.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether the expiry of the measures would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping.
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe se je proučilo, ali je verjetno, da bi iztek ukrepov povzročil nadaljevanje ali ponovitev dampinga.
During the RIP, exports to the Community of UAN originating in the countries concerned only took place from Algeria.
V OPP se je SAN s poreklom iz zadevnih držav izvažal v Skupnost le iz Alžirije.
Thus, a dumping calculation to examine whether there was likelihood of continuation of dumping was carried out for the two cooperating Algerian exporting producers.
Zato je bil izračun dampinga, da se prouči, ali je nadaljevanje dampinga verjetno, opravljen za sodelujoča alžirska proizvajalca izvoznika.
For the other cooperating exporting producers in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine, the investigation focused on the likelihood of recurrence of dumping.
Pri drugih sodelujočih proizvajalcih izvoznikih iz Belorusije, Rusije in Ukrajine se je preiskava osredotočila na verjetnost ponovitve dampinga.
The only two Algerian producers of UAN, Fertalge and Fertial, cooperated in the investigation.
Pri preiskavi sta sodelovala le dva alžirska proizvajalca SAN, Fertalge in Fertial.
These two producers represented the totality of exports of UAN originating in Algeria to the Community during the RIP, which corresponded to 177383 tonnes.
Ta dva proizvajalca sta predstavljala celoten izvoz SAN s poreklom iz Alžirije v Skupnost v OPP, kar je ustrezalo 177383 tonam.
Imports into the Community of the product concerned originating in Algeria represented 4,8 % of Community consumption which was 3694531 tonnes in the RIP.
Uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Alžirije v Skupnost je predstavljal 4,8 % potrošnje Skupnosti v OPP, kar je ustrezalo 3694531 tonam v OPP.
Imports from Algeria thus went up from 116461 tonnes by 52 % in comparison to the original investigation period.
V primerjavi z obdobjem prvotne preiskave se je tako uvoz iz Alžirije s 116461 ton povečal za 52 %.
Therefore, the examination of dumping based on the information provided by these two cooperating exporting producers was considered to also be representative for the country as a whole.
Zato se je proučitev dampinga na podlagi informacij, ki sta jih predložila sodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika, štela kot reprezentativna za celotno državo.
It was first established for each of the two cooperating exporting producers whether its total domestic sales of UAN were representative in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, i.e. whether they accounted for 5 % or more of the total sales volume of the product concerned exported to the Community.
Komisija je za vsakega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika najprej preverila, ali je njegova celotna domača prodaja SAN reprezentativna v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe, tj. ali zajema vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega prodaje zadevnega izdelka, ki se izvaža v Skupnost.
The investigation showed that both companies only sold one type of UAN to the Community and that this type was not sold in representative quantities on the domestic market.
Preiskava je pokazala, da sta obe družbi prodajali v Skupnosti le eno vrsto SAN in da se ta vrsta na domačem trgu ni prodajala v reprezentativnih količinah.
Therefore, for both exporting producers normal value could not be based on domestic sales and had to be constructed pursuant to Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation by adding to each exporter's cost of manufacturing of the product exported to the Community a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative costs (SG&A costs) and a reasonable profit margin.
Zato normalna vrednost za oba proizvajalca izvoznika ni mogla temeljiti na domači prodaji, ampak jo je bilo treba določiti v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe tako, da sta bila stroškom vsakega izvoznika za proizvodnjo izdelka, ki se izvaža v Skupnost, prišteta ustrezen znesek za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške („PSA-stroški“) ter ustrezna stopnja dobička.
Regarding the cost of manufacturing, it should be noted that energy costs, such as electricity and gas, represent a major proportion of the manufacturing cost and a significant proportion of the total cost of production.
V zvezi s proizvodnimi stroški je treba poudariti, da stroški energije, kot sta elektrika in plin, predstavljajo glavni delež proizvodnih stroškov in znaten delež skupnih proizvodnih stroškov.
In accordance with Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether the costs associated with the production and sales of the product under consideration were reasonably reflected in the records of the parties concerned.
V skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe se je proučilo, ali so bili stroški proizvodnje in prodaje obravnavanega izdelka v računovodskih evidencah zadevnih strank ustrezno prikazani.
The investigation showed no indication that the electricity would not be reasonably reflected in the records of the exporting producers.
Preiskava ni pokazala, da električna energija v evidencah proizvajalcev izvoznikov ne bi bila realno prikazana.
In this context, it is inter alia noted that electricity prices paid by the Algerian producers during the RIP were in line with international market prices, when compared to other countries, such as Canada and Norway.
V zvezi s tem je bilo med drugim ugotovljeno, da so bile cene električne energije, ki so jih v OPP plačevali alžirski proizvajalci, v skladu z mednarodnimi tržnimi cenami, kar je pokazala primerjava z drugimi državami, kot sta Kanada in Norveška.
However, the same could not be said with regard to gas prices.
Vendar to ne velja za cene plina.
As concerns gas supplies, in fact, it was established on the basis of data published by internationally recognised sources specialised in energy markets, that the price paid by the Algerian producer was less than one fifth of the export price of natural gas from Algeria.
V zvezi z oskrbo s plinom je bilo na podlagi podatkov, ki so jih objavili mednarodno priznani viri, specializirani za energetske trge, dejansko ugotovljeno, da je bila cena, ki jo je plačeval alžirski proizvajalec, nižja od ene petine izvozne cene zemeljskega plina iz Alžirije.
In addition, all available data indicates that domestic gas prices in Algeria were regulated prices, which are far below market prices paid for natural gas, for example in the USA, Canada, Japan and the EU.
Poleg tega vsi razpoložljivi podatki kažejo, da so bile domače cene plina v Alžiriji nadzorovane in so precej nižje od tržnih cen za zemeljski plin, ki veljajo na primer v ZDA, Kanadi, na Japonskem in v EU.
These four markets account for a total of 46 % of worldwide gas consumption, and the prevailing domestic price levels in these four markets appear to reasonably reflect costs.
Ti štirje trgi zajemajo skupaj 46 % svetovne potrošnje plina, prevladujoče ravni domačih cen na teh trgih pa ustrezno odražajo stroške.
Moreover, the price of gas paid by the companies concerned was significantly lower than the gas price paid by the Community producers.
Poleg tega je bila cena plina, ki so jo plačevale zadevne družbe, znatno nižja od cene plina, ki so jo plačevali proizvajalci Skupnosti.
In view of the above, it was considered that the gas prices paid in Algeria during the review investigation period could not reasonably reflect the costs associated with the production and distribution of gas.
Ob upoštevanju zgornjega je prevladalo mnenje, da cene plina v Alžiriji v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom niso mogle ustrezno odražati stroškov proizvodnje in distribucije plina.
Therefore, as provided for in Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation, the gas costs borne by one cooperating exporting producer, Fertial, were adjusted on the basis of information from other representative markets.
Zato so bili stroški plina, ki jih je imel sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik Fertial, v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe prilagojeni na podlagi informacij z drugih reprezentativnih trgov.