natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 160 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo in zlasti drugega pododstavka člena 160 Pogodbe,
Having regard to the request of the Court of Justice of 11 July 2007,
ob upoštevanju pobude Sodišča z dne 11. julija 2007,
Having regard to the opinion of the Commission of 20 November 2007,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije z dne 20. novembra 2007,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament of 29 November 2007,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega parlamenta z dne 29. novembra 2007,
Provision should be made to allow derogations from certain provisions of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice with regard to the procedure governing urgent references for a preliminary ruling concerning the area of freedom, security and justice, and it is appropriate, for the sake of good order, that the provision authorising such derogations should also refer to the expedited and accelerated procedures laid down in the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice,
Predvideti bi bilo treba možnost odstopanja od nekaterih določb Protokola o statutu Sodišča v okviru postopka uvedbe nujnega postopka za obravnavanje predlogov za sprejetje predhodnih odločb, ki se nanašajo na območje svobode, varnosti in pravice; v določbi, ki dovoljuje ta odstopanja, pa bi bilo treba zaradi urejenosti navesti tudi sklicevanje na hitri postopek, ki ga določa Poslovnik Sodišča –
The following Article shall be inserted after Article 23 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice:
V Protokolu o statutu Sodišča se za členom 23 vstavi nov člen:
The Rules of Procedure may provide for an expedited or accelerated procedure and, for references for a preliminary ruling relating to the area of freedom, security and justice, an urgent procedure.
S Poslovnikom se lahko predvidi hitri postopek, za obravnavanje predlogov za sprejetje predhodnih odločb, ki se nanašajo na območje svobode, varnosti in pravice, pa nujni postopek.
Those procedures may provide, in respect of the submission of statements of case or written observations, for a shorter period than that provided for by Article 23, and, in derogation from the fourth paragraph of Article 20, for the case to be determined without a submission from the Advocate General.
Pri teh postopkih se lahko za predložitev vlog ali pisnih stališč predvidi rok, ki je krajši od roka, določenega v členu 23, z odstopanjem od četrte alinee člena 20 pa se lahko predvidi tudi, da ni sklepnih predlogov generalnega pravobranilca.
In addition, the urgent procedure may provide for restriction of the parties and other interested persons mentioned in Article 23, authorised to submit statements of case or written observations and, in cases of extreme urgency, for the written stage of the procedure to be omitted.’
V nujnem postopku se lahko poleg tega predvidi tudi omejitev strank in drugih udeležencev iz člena 23 Statuta, ki lahko predložijo vloge ali pisna stališča, in da se v izjemno nujnih primerih pisni postopek ne opravi.“
This Decision shall enter into force on the first day of the second month following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta sklep začne veljati prvi dan drugega meseca po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
(Official Journal of the European Union L 131 of 28 May 2009)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 131 z dne 28. maja 2009)
On page 14, Article 6(1):
Stran 14, člen 6(1):
In addition to the measures taken under Article 5, the Commission may, in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 12(2), impose fines on a recognised organisation:
Komisija lahko v skladu s svetovalnim postopkom iz člena 12(2) poleg ukrepov, sprejetih na podlagi člena 5, naloži globe priznanim organizacijam:
whose serious or repeated failure to fulfil the minimum criteria set out in Annex I or its obligations under Articles 8(4), 9, 10 and 11,
katerih resno ali večkratno neizpolnjevanje minimalnih meril iz Priloge I ali svojih obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz členov 8(4), 9, 10 in 11
which has deliberately provided incorrect, incomplete or misleading information to the Commission in the course of its assessment pursuant to Article 8(1) or otherwise obstructed that assessment.’,
ki so Komisiji v času ocenjevanja v skladu s členom 8(1) namenoma predložile netočne, nepopolne ali zavajajoče informacije ali so kako drugače ovirale ocenjevanje.“
whose worsening performance
katerih zmanjšana učinkovitost
reveals serious shortcomings in its structure, systems, procedures or internal controls; or
razkriva resne hibe v njihovi organiziranosti, sistemih, postopkih ali notranjih nadzorih; ali
which has deliberately provided incorrect, incomplete or misleading information to the Commission in the course of its assessment pursuant to Article 8(1) or otherwise obstructed that assessment.’.
ki so Komisiji v času ocenjevanja v skladu s členom 8(1) namenoma predložile netočne, nepopolne ali zavajajoče informacije ali so kako drugače ovirale ocenjevanje.“
Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations
Popravek Uredbe (ES) št. 391/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o skupnih pravilih in standardih za organizacije za tehnični nadzor in pregled ladij
(Recast)
(prenovitev)
whose worsening performance reveals serious shortcomings in its structure, systems, procedures or internal controls;
katerih zmanjšana učinkovitost razkriva resne hibe v njihovi organiziranosti, sistemih, postopkih ali notranjih nadzorih,
concerning national provisions notified by the Republic of Austria on certain fluorinated greenhouse gases
o nacionalnih določbah o nekaterih fluoriranih toplogrednih plinih, o katerih je Republika Avstrija poslala uradno obvestilo
(notified under document number C(2007) 6646)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 6646)
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 842/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on certain fluorinated greenhouse gases [1], and in particular Article 9(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 842/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. maja 2006 o določenih fluoriranih toplogrednih plinih [1] in zlasti člena 9(3) Uredbe,
On 29 June 2007, the Republic of Austria informed the Commission, pursuant to Article 9(3)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 842/2006 on certain fluorinated greenhouse gases, about national measures adopted in 2002 (BGBl.
Republika Avstrija je 29. junija 2007 v skladu s členom 9(3)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 842/2006 o določenih fluoriranih toplogrednih plinih obvestila Komisijo o nacionalnih ukrepih, sprejetih leta 2002 (BGBl.
II No 447/2002 — Ordinance of the Federal Minister for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management on bans and restrictions for partly fluorinated and fully fluorinated hydrocarbons and sulphur hexafluoride (HFC-PFC-SF6 Ordinance), published in the Federal Law Gazette on 10 December 2002) as subsequently amended by Ordinance BGBl.
II št. 447/2002 – Odredba zveznega ministra za kmetijstvo, gozdarstvo, okolje in upravljanje z vodami o prepovedih in omejitvah za delno in popolnoma fluorirane ogljikovodike in žveplov heksafluorid (Odredba o HFC-PFC-SF6), objavljena v Zveznem uradnem listu 10. decembra 2002), kakor je bila pozneje spremenjena z Odredbo iz BGBl.
II No 139/2007, 21.6.2007.
II št. 139/2007 z dne 21. junija 2007.
In this letter the Austrian Government points out that the Republic of Austria intends to maintain its national provisions which are more stringent than the Regulation, in accordance with Article 9(3)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 842/2006 until 31 December 2012.
V tem dopisu avstrijska vlada poudarja, da namerava Republika Avstrija do 31. decembra 2012 ohraniti svoje nacionalne določbe, ki so strožje od določb Uredbe (ES) št. 842/2006, v skladu s členom 9(3)(a) navedene uredbe.
ARTICLE 95(4), (5) AND (6) OF THE EC TREATY
ČLEN 95(4), (5) IN (6) POGODBE ES
Article 95(4) of the EC Treaty provides that ‘If, after the adoption by the Council or by the Commission of a harmonisation measure, a Member State deems it necessary to maintain national provisions on grounds of major needs referred to in Article 30, or relating to the protection of the environment or the working environment, it shall notify the Commission of these provisions as well as the grounds for maintaining them.’
Člen 95(4) Pogodbe ES določa, da „če po tem, ko Svet ali Komisija sprejme usklajevalni ukrep, država članica meni, da mora ohraniti nacionalne določbe zaradi pomembnih potreb iz člena 30 ali določbe, ki zadevajo varstvo okolja ali delovnega okolja, o teh določbah pa tudi o razlogih za njihovo ohranitev uradno obvesti Komisijo“.
Article 95(5) of the EC Treaty provides that ‘[…], without prejudice to paragraph 4, if, after the adoption by the Council or by the Commission of a harmonisation measure, a Member State deems it necessary to introduce national provisions based on new scientific evidence relating to the protection of the environment or the working environment on grounds of a problem specific to that Member State arising after the adoption of the harmonisation measure, it shall notify the Commission of the envisaged provisions as well as the grounds for introducing them’.
Člen 95(5) Pogodbe ES določa: „Brez poseganja v odstavek 4 pa država članica, če po tem, ko Svet ali Komisija sprejme usklajevalni ukrep, meni, da mora na podlagi novih znanstvenih spoznanj o varstvu okolja ali delovnega okolja uvesti nacionalne določbe zaradi problema, ki je specifičen zanjo in je posledica sprejetja usklajevalnega ukrepa, o načrtovanih določbah pa tudi o razlogih za njihovo uvedbo uradno obvesti Komisijo“.
According to Article 95(6), the Commission shall, within six months of the notification, approve or reject the national provisions involved after having verified whether or not they are a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States and whether or not they shall constitute an obstacle to the functioning of the internal market.
Komisija v skladu s členom 95(6) v šestih mesecih po uradnih obvestilih odobri ali zavrne nacionalne določbe, potem ko preveri, ali so morda sredstvo samovoljne diskriminacije ali prikrita omejitev trgovine med državami članicami in ali ovirajo delovanje notranjega trga.
REGULATION (EC) No 842/2006
UREDBA (ES) ŠT. 842/2006
Regulation (EC) No 842/2006 on certain fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-gases) aims at preventing and containing the emissions of certain F-gases (HFCs, PFCs and SF6) covered by the Kyoto Protocol.
Uredba (ES) št. 842/2006 o določenih fluoriranih toplogrednih plinih (F-plinih) je namenjena preprečevanju in omejevanju emisij nekaterih F-plinov (HFC, PFC in SF6), ki jih zajema Kjotski protokol.
It also contains a limited number of use bans and placing on the market prohibitions when alternatives were considered available and cost effective at Community level and where improvement of containment and recovery were regarded as not feasible.
Uredba vsebuje tudi omejeno število prepovedi uporabe in prepovedi dajanja v promet, kadar je ugotovljeno, da so na ravni Skupnosti na voljo stroškovno učinkovite nadomestne snovi in da izboljšanje omejitve in rekuperacije emisij ni izvedljivo.
The Regulation has a double legal basis, Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty with respect to all provisions and Article 95 of the EC Treaty for Articles 7, 8 and 9, due to their implications in terms of free circulation of goods within the EC single market.
Uredba ima dvojno pravno podlago, vse določbe temeljijo na členu 175(1) Pogodbe ES, členi 7, 8 in 9 pa zaradi svojega vpliva na prost pretok blaga na enotnem trgu ES temeljijo na členu 95 Pogodbe ES.
Article 9 of the Regulation governs the placing on the market and, more precisely, prohibits the marketing of a number of products and equipment containing, or whose functioning relies upon, F-gases covered by the Regulation.
Člen 9 Uredbe ureja dajanje v promet in natančneje prepoveduje trženje številnih izdelkov in opreme, ki vsebujejo F-pline, ki jih vključuje Uredba, ali katerih delovanje je od njih odvisno.
In its paragraph 3(a) it stipulates that Member States that have, by 31 December 2005, adopted national measures which are stricter than those laid down in the Article and which fall under the scope of the Regulation may maintain those national measures until 31 December 2012.
V odstavku 3(a) navedenega člena je določeno, da lahko države članice, ki so do 31. decembra 2005 sprejele nacionalne ukrepe, ki so strožji od tistih iz navedenega člena in spadajo na področje uporabe Uredbe, ohranijo navedene nacionalne ukrepe do 31. decembra 2012.
In accordance with its paragraph 3(b), these measures and their justification shall be notified to the Commission and they shall be compatible with the Treaty.
Zadevne države članice v skladu z odstavkom 3(b) navedenega člena Komisijo uradno obvestijo o navedenih ukrepih in njihovi utemeljitvi, pri čemer morajo biti ti ukrepi združljivi s Pogodbo.
NATIONAL PROVISIONS NOTIFIED
URADNO OBVESTILO O NACIONALNIH PREDPISIH
The national provisions notified by the Republic of Austria were introduced by Ordinance No 447/2002 of 10 December 2002 and amended by Ordinance No 139/2007 of 21 June 2007.
Nacionalne določbe, o katerih je Republika Avstrija poslala uradno obvestilo, so bile uvedene z Odredbo št. 447/2002 z dne 10. decembra 2002 in spremenjene z Odredbo št. 139/2007 z dne 21. junija 2007.
Ordinance No 447/2002 as amended by Ordinance No 139/2007 (hereafter the Ordinance) concerns greenhouse gases classified under the Kyoto Protocol, most of which have high global warming potentials: hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs) and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6), with a view of meeting Austria’s emission reduction targets.
Odredba št. 447/2002, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odredbo št. 139/2007 (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Odredba“), zadeva toplogredne pline, ki so navedeni v Kjotskem protokolu in od katerih ima večina velik potencial globalnega segrevanja, in sicer fluorirani ogljikovodiki (HFC), perfluorirani ogljikovodiki (PFC) in žveplov heksafluorid (SF6), ter je bila izdana z namenom, da bi Avstrija izpolnila cilje zmanjšanja emisij.
The Ordinance bans the placing on the market and use of the abovementioned greenhouse gases and their use in certain equipment, units and products, unless they are used for research, development and analytical purposes.
Odredba prepoveduje dajanje v promet in uporabo zgoraj navedenih toplogrednih plinov ter njihovo uporabo v nekateri opremi, enotah in proizvodih, razen če se uporabljajo v raziskovalne, razvojne in analitične namene.
The detailed provisions on bans and the conditions of permissibility are laid down in Articles 4 to 17 of the Ordinance.
Podrobne določbe o prepovedi in pogojih dopustnosti so določene v členih od 4 do 17 Odredbe.
The amendment in 2007 takes into account the decision of the Austrian Constitutional Court to annul (in decisions of 9 June 2005 and 1 December 2005, published in the Federal Law Gazette on 9 August 2005 and 24 February 2006 respectively) the limit value of Global Warming Potential 3000 for HFC laid down in Article 12(2) line 3 of Ordinance No 447/2002, as well as the exception clause laid down in Article 12(2) line 3(a) thereof, with the reason of their being unlawful.
S spremembo iz leta 2007 je upoštevana odločitev avstrijskega ustavnega sodišča, ki je razveljavilo (v odločbah z dne 9. junija 2005 in 1. decembra 2005, objavljenih v Zveznem uradnem listu 9. avgusta 2005 in 24. februarja 2006) mejno vrednost potenciala globalnega segrevanja za HFC, določeno na 3000 v vrstici 3 člena 12(2) Odredbe št. 447/2002, in določbo o izjemi iz točke a) vrstice 3 člena 12(2) Odredbe, ker naj bi bili nezakoniti.
Furthermore, the amendment in 2007 introduced relaxations of the restrictions relating to the refrigeration and air-conditioning sector bringing them into line with provisions under Regulation (EC) No 842/2006.
Poleg tega so bile s spremembo iz leta 2007 uvedene manjše omejitve v zvezi s sektorjema opreme za hlajenje in klimatizacijo, s čimer se ju je uskladilo z določbami iz Uredbe (ES) št. 842/2006.
Mobile refrigeration and air-conditioning are no longer covered by the amended Ordinance.
Spremenjena odredba ne velja več za premično opremo za hlajenje in klimatizacijo.
As regards stationary applications, the bans only apply to small plug in units with a refrigerant charge of 150 g or less and to stand alone equipment with a refrigerant charge of 20 kg or over.
Glede nepremičnih aplikacij se prepoved uporablja samo za majhne vstavljive enote s 150 g hladilnega plina ali manj in za samostojne naprave z 20 kg hladilnega plina ali več.
For other applications technical parameters are defined ensuring that no more refrigerants are used than necessary in accordance with the state of art. Changes have also been made with respect to the treatment of aerosols containing HFCs and the use of SF6 to bring them in line with EU legislation.
Za druge aplikacije so opredeljeni tehnični parametri, s katerimi je zagotovljeno, da se ne uporablja več hladilnega plina, kot je potrebno v skladu s tehničnimi zahtevami. Uvedene so bile tudi spremembe v zvezi z ravnanjem z aerosoli, ki vsebujejo HFC, in uporabo žveplovega heksafluorida, da se ju je uskladilo z zakonodajo EU.
By letter of 1 August 2007 the Commission informed the Austrian Government that it had received the notification and that the six-month period for its examination under Article 95(6) started on 30 June 2007, the day following the day on which the notification was received.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 1. avgusta 2007 obvestila avstrijsko vlado, da je prejela uradno obvestilo in da se je šestmesečno obdobje preverjanja iz člena 95(6) začelo 30. junija 2007, dan po prejemu uradnega obvestila.
By letter of 12 October 2007, the Commission informed the other Member States of the notification providing them a period of 30 days to submit any comments.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 12. oktobra 2007 druge države članice obvestila o uradnem obvestilu in jim dala na voljo 30 dni za predložitev pripomb.
The Commission also published a notice regarding the notification in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] in order to inform other interested parties of Austria’s national provisions, as well as the grounds invoked to that effect.
Komisija je uradno obvestilo tudi objavila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2], da bi druge zainteresirane strani obvestila o nacionalnih določbah Avstrije in razlogih zanje.
The present notification has been examined in the light of Article 95(4) and (5) of the EC Treaty and in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 842/2006.
Sedanje uradno obvestilo je bilo pregledano ob upoštevanju člena 95(4) in (5) Pogodbe ES in v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 842/2006.
Article 95(4) concerns cases where, after the adoption of a harmonisation measure, a Member State deems it necessary to maintain national provisions on grounds of major needs referred to in Article 30, or relating to the protection of the environment or the working environment.
Člen 95(4) zadeva primere, ko država članica po sprejetju usklajevalnega ukrepa meni, da mora ohraniti nacionalne določbe zaradi pomembnih potreb iz člena 30 ali določbe, ki zadevajo varstvo okolja ali delovnega okolja.
However, since the measures adopted in 2002 have been amended in 2007 it is appropriate to examine if Article 95(5) applies with regard to such provisions of the Ordinance which were modified after adoption of Regulation (EC) No 842/2006.
Ker pa so bili ukrepi, sprejeti leta 2002, spremenjeni leta 2007, je ustrezno, da se prouči, ali se člen 95(5) uporablja v zvezi z določbami Odredbe, ki so bile spremenjene po sprejetju Uredbe (ES) št. 842/2006.
If such provisions had changed the substance of those already enacted before the harmonisation act, they should have been notified to the Commission before adoption and justified on the basis of on new scientific evidence on grounds of a problem specific to that Member State arising after the adoption of the harmonisation measure.
Če bi bile te določbe bistveno spremenile vsebino določb, sprejetih pred usklajevalnim ukrepom, bi bilo o njih treba obvestiti Komisijo pred njihovim sprejetjem in jih utemeljiti z novimi znanstvenimi dokazi na osnovi problema, ki je specifičen za zadevno državo članico in posledica sprejetja usklajevalnega ukrepa.
The analysis of the amending act concluded that the amendments introduced in 2007 aimed either at deleting provisions (points 10, 12 of the amending Ordinance), reducing their scope to more specific products or applications without adding new requirements (points 1, 3 and 10 of the amending Ordinance), or at introducing additional possibilities to derogate from restriction imposed by the 2002 Ordinance (points 6, 7 of the amending Ordinance).
Z analizo akta o spremembi je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bil namen sprememb, uvedenih leta 2007, črtanje določb (točki 10 in 12 Odredbe o spremembi), zmanjšanje njihovega področja uporabe na bolj specifične izdelke ali aplikacije brez dodajanja novih zahtev (točke 1, 3 in 10 Odredbe o spremembi) ali uvedba dodatnih možnosti za odstopanje od omejitev, določenih z Odredbo iz leta 2002 (točki 6 in 7 Odredbe o spremembi).
Furthermore, references to Regulation (EC) No 842/2006 and explicit requirements taking account of the harmonisation measures were introduced (points 1, 8, 9 of the amending Ordinance).
Poleg tega je bilo dodano sklicevanje na Uredbo (ES) št. 842/2006 in izrecne zahteve, pri katerih so upoštevani usklajevalni ukrepi (točke 1, 8 in 9 Odredbe o spremembi).
No measures were identified which changed the substance of the measures enacted before the adoption of the harmonisation measure in a way that additional restrictions were introduces.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da ni nobenih ukrepov, ki bi vsebino ukrepov, sprejetih pred sprejetjem usklajevalnega ukrepa, spreminjali tako, da bi uvajali dodatne omejitve.
Thus this amendment did not contain new measures which have to be considered as more stringent than Regulation (EC) No 842/2006, but reduced their impact on the internal market.
Ta sprememba torej ni vsebovala novih ukrepov, ki bi veljali za strožje od ukrepov iz Uredbe (ES) št. 842/2006, temveč je na podlagi spremembe zmanjšan njihov vpliv na notranji trg.
Therefore, it is appropriate to apply Article 95(4) for the evaluation of all provisions of the Ordinance, also to those amended in 2007.
Zato je ustrezno, da se za oceno vseh določb Odredbe, tudi tistih, ki so bile spremenjene leta 2007, uporablja člen 95(4).
The Ordinance continues to consists, however, of more stringent provisions than Regulation (EC) No 842/2006 since it contains bans on the import, sale and use of new products containing F-gases after 1 January 2006 as well as a ban on the import, sale and use of F-gases, new and recovered, after 1 January 2006, while the Regulation contains a less restrictive ban on the placing on the market since it only applies to products as listed in its Annex II.
Vendar odredba vsebuje določbe, ki so strožje od določb iz Uredbe (ES) št. 842/2006, saj vsebuje prepoved uvoza, prodaje in uporabe novih izdelkov, ki vsebujejo F-pline, po 1. januarju 2006 ter prepoved uvoza, prodaje in uporabe F-plinov, novih in pridobljenih z rekuperacijo, po 1. januarju 2006, medtem ko Uredba vsebuje manj omejujočo prepoved dajanja v promet, saj velja samo za izdelke, navedene v Prilogi II.
Furthermore, the Regulation imposes restrictions on the use only on SF6, while the Austrian measure controls also the use of HFCs and PFCs.
Poleg tega Uredba določa omejitve samo pri uporabi SF6, medtem ko je pri avstrijskem ukrepu predviden tudi nadzor uporabe HFC in PFC.
By going further in terms of placing on the market and control of use, the Ordinance is more stringent than the legislation now in force at Community level.
Odredba je tako s svojo zahtevnostjo glede dajanja v promet in nadzora uporabe strožja kot zakonodaja na ravni Skupnosti, ki je zdaj v veljavi.