natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For those product types where more than 80 %, by volume, of sales on the domestic market were not below unit costs, i.e. where the average sales price of the product type concerned was equal to or higher than the average production cost for the product type concerned, normal value was calculated as the average price of all domestic sales of the product type in question irrespective of whether these sales were profitable or not.
Za tiste vrste izdelka, pri katerih več kot 80 % obsega prodaje na domačem trgu ni bilo nižje od stroškov na enoto, se pravi, kjer je bila povprečna prodajna cena zadevne vrste izdelka enaka ali višja od povprečnih proizvodnih stroškov za zadevno vrsto izdelka, je bila normalna vrednost izračunana kot povprečna cena vse domače prodaje zadevne vrste izdelka, ne glede na to, ali je bila ta prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne.
For those product types where at least 10 % but no more than 80 %, by volume, of sales on the domestic market were not below unit costs, normal value was calculated as the weighted average sales price of those transactions which were made at or above unit costs of the type in question.
Za tiste vrste izdelka, pri katerih najmanj 10 %, vendar ne več kot 80 % obsega prodaje na domačem trgu ni bilo nižje od stroškov na enoto, je bila normalna vrednost izračunana kot tehtano povprečje prodajne cene tistih poslov, ki so bili izvedeni po ceni, enaki ali višji od stroškov na enoto zadevne vrste.
For those product types where less than 10 %, by volume, was sold on the domestic market at a price not below unit cost, it was considered that the product type concerned was not sold in the ordinary course of trade and therefore, normal value had to be constructed in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
Za tiste vrste izdelka, pri katerih manj kot 10 % obsega prodaje na domačem trgu ni bilo nižje od stroškov na enoto, se je štelo, da zadevna vrsta izdelka ni bila prodana v običajnem poteku trgovine in zato je bilo treba normalno vrednost konstruirati v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe.
In the cases where normal values had to be constructed, they were constructed in accordance with Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation, i.e. on the basis of the manufacturing cost of the type concerned, to which was added an amount of selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses and a margin of profit.
V primerih, kjer je bilo treba normalne vrednosti računsko konstruirati, so bile te konstruirane v skladu s členom 2(6) osnovne uredbe, tj. na podlagi proizvodnih stroškov zadevne vrste, h katerim je bil prištet znesek prodajnih, splošnih in administrativnih stroškov (PSA-stroški) in stopnja dobička.
The amount of SG&A was that incurred by the exporting producer for the like product and the amount of profit equated to the average profit realised by the exporting producer on sales of the like product in the ordinary course of trade.
Znesek PSA-stroškov, ki jih je imel proizvajalec izvoznik s podobnim izdelkom in znesek dobička sta bila enaka povprečnemu dobičku, ki ga ima proizvajalec izvoznik s prodajo podobnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovine.
In all cases where the product concerned was exported to independent customers in the Community, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, namely on the basis of export prices actually paid or payable.
V vseh primerih izvoza zadevnega izdelka neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe, namreč na podlagi izvoznih cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo.
In cases where sales were made via a related importer or trader, the export price was constructed on the basis of the resale prices of that related importer to independent customers.
V primerih, ko je prodaja potekala prek povezanega uvoznika ali trgovca, je bila izvozna cena konstruirana na podlagi cen pri nadaljnji prodaji tega povezanega uvoznika neodvisnim strankam.
Adjustments were made for all costs incurred between importation and resale including sales, general and administrative expenses, and a reasonable profit margin, in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Prilagoditve so bile opravljene za vse stroške, ki so nastali med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, vključno s prodajnimi, splošnimi in administrativnimi stroški in ustrezno stopnjo dobička v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
The appropriate profit margin was established on the basis of information provided by unrelated cooperating traders/importers operating on the Community market.
Ustrezna stopnja dobička je bila določena na podlagi informacij, ki so jih zagotovili nepovezani sodelujoči trgovci/uvozniki, ki poslujejo na trgu Skupnosti.
The normal value and export price were compared on an ex-works basis.
Normalna vrednost in izvozna cena sta se primerjali na podlagi franko tovarna.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences affecting the price and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Za zagotovitev poštene primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno so se v obliki prilagoditev ustrezno upoštevale razlike, ki vplivajo na ceno in primerljivost cen v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
Appropriate adjustments were granted in all cases where they were found to be reasonable, accurate and supported by evidence.
Ustrezne prilagoditve so bile opravljene v vseh primerih, kjer je bilo ugotovljeno, da so razumne, točne in podprte z dokazi.
In accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation, a dumping margin was calculated for each cooperating exporting producer, by comparing the weighted average normal value with the weighted average export price.
V skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe je bila stopnja dampinga izračunana za vsakega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika s primerjavo tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno.
For those countries where the level of cooperation was found to be high (above 80 % of all volumes imported to the Community during the RIP), and where there was no reason to believe that any exporting producer abstained from cooperating, the residual dumping margin was set at the level of the cooperating exporting producer with the highest dumping margin in order to ensure the effectiveness of the measures.
Za tiste države, kjer je bila ugotovljena visoka raven sodelovanja (nad 80 % vsega obsega uvoza v Skupnost med OPP) in kjer ni bilo razloga za domnevo, da se je kateri koli proizvajalec izvoznik vzdržal sodelovanja, je bila preostala stopnja dampinga določena na ravni sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika z najvišjo stopnjo dampinga, da bi zagotovili učinkovitost ukrepov.
For those countries where the level of cooperation was found to be low (less than 80 % of all volumes imported to the Community during the RIP), the residual dumping margin was determined in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, i.e. on the basis of facts available.
Za tiste države, kjer je bila ugotovljena nizka raven sodelovanja (manj kot 80 % vsega obsega uvoza v Skupnost med OPP), je bila preostala stopnja dampinga določena v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe, tj. na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev.
Dumping of imports during the investigation period — Country specific findings
Damping uvoza med obdobjem preiskave – ugotovitve glede posameznih držav
Three out of five known exporting producers cooperated with the investigation.
V preiskavi so sodelovali trije od petih znanih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
The two non-cooperating companies account for more than 80 % of India's total PET production and around 25 % of India's exports to the Community.
Dve nesodelujoči družbi sta predstavljali več kot 80 % celotne indijske proizvodnje PET in približno 25 % indijskega izvoza v Skupnost.
The share of Indian exports to the Community in relation to Community consumption amounted to 0,3 % in the RIP.
Delež indijskega izvoza v Skupnost glede na potrošnjo Skupnosti je v OPP znašal 0,3 %.
Two of the three cooperating exporters hold price undertakings with respect to their PET exports to the Community, which were concluded pursuant to the original investigation.
Dva od treh sodelujočih izvoznikov sta imela za svoj izvoz PET v Skupnost cenovne zaveze, ki so bile sklenjene na podlagi prvotne preiskave.
With regards to two cooperating companies it was found that their Community export prices were in compliance with the minimum prices set by the undertakings.
Pri dveh sodelujočih družbah je bilo ugotovljeno, da so njune izvozne cene za Skupnost v skladu z najnižjimi cenami, določenimi v zavezah.
These prices clearly exceeded the ones charged for sales to third countries' markets.
Te cene so očitno presegale cene, zaračunane za prodajo na trgih tretjih držav.
The latter sales were made in much larger quantities than Community exports.
Količine v prodaji na teh trgih so bile veliko večje kot pri izvozu v Skupnost.
This indicates that the prices charged to Community customers do not reflect the normal pricing behaviour of the Indian price undertaking holders.
To pomeni, da cene, ki se zaračunajo strankam v Skupnosti, ne odražajo normalnega obnašanja indijskih nosilcev cenovne zaveze pri določanju cen.
With respect to exports to the Community, the dumping margins of the three cooperating exporting producers were found to be in a range between no dumping and 17 %.
V zvezi z izvozom v Skupnost je bila pri treh sodelujočih proizvajalcih izvoznikih ugotovljena stopnja dampinga v razponu od nič do 17 %.
It should be noted that the exporting producer with no dumping holds a price undertaking and that the quantity of its Community exports was very small (less than 10 %) in proportion to its third country exports.
Treba je opozoriti, da je sklenil proizvajalec izvoznik, ki ne izvaja dampinga, cenovno zavezo in da je bila količina njegovega izvoza v Skupnost zelo majhna (manj kot 10 %) glede na njegov izvoz v tretje države.
In the original investigation including subsequent reviews dumping margins were in a range between 14,7 % and 51,5 % [8].
V prvotni preiskavi, vključno z naknadnimi pregledi, so bile stopnje dampinga v razponu med 14,7 % in 51,5 % [8].
However, as the imported quantities were indeed very small, the main focus of the analysis is on the likelihood of recurrence of dumping.
Glede na to, da so bile uvožene količine res zelo majhne, je glavni poudarek analize na verjetnosti ponovitve dampinga.
As it was thus impossible to verify whether the data submitted by the third company in the questionnaire reply was correct, this company did not cooperate properly in the investigation within the meaning of Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Ker je bilo tako nemogoče preveriti, ali so bili podatki, ki jih je tretja družba predložila v izpolnjenem vprašalniku, pravilni, ta družba v smislu člena 18 osnovne uredbe ni ustrezno sodelovala v preiskavi.
The company was informed accordingly and was given the opportunity to comment on this finding.
Družba je bila ustrezno obveščena in je dobila možnost, da predloži pripombo na to ugotovitev.
One of the cooperating companies had a very small quantity of sales to the EU market but these were made to one specialist user in the medical sector.
Ena od sodelujočih družb je imela zelo majhno količino prodaje na trgu EU, vendar je bila ta opravljena za enega specializiranega uporabnika v medicinskem sektorju.
Therefore, neither the volume nor the unit price of these sales was considered to be representative.
Zato se obseg in cena na enoto pri tej prodaji nista štela za reprezentativno.
Apart from this very small volume, no other sales were recorded in Eurostat on the EU market originating from Indonesia.
Poleg tega zelo majhnega obsega Eurostat ni zabeležil nobene druge prodaje na trgu EU s poreklom iz Indonezije.
Normal value, export price and dumping margin
Normalna vrednost, izvozna cena in stopnja dampinga
As the two cooperating companies made no representative sales on the EU market in the RIP, and the Eurostat import statistics showed that there were no further imports from Indonesia, no dumping margin could be established.
Ker dve sodelujoči družbi v OPP nista imeli reprezentativne prodaje na trgu EU in je statistika Eurostata o uvozu pokazala, da ni bilo nadaljnjega uvoza iz Indonezije, stopnje dampinga ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti.
Total imports of the product concerned from Malaysia were small, i.e. in the range of 2000 to 4000 tonnes when compared to the Community market as a whole.
Skupen uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Malezije je bil zelo majhen, in sicer v razponu od 2000–4000 ton v primerjavi s trgom Skupnosti kot celoto.
For the exporting producer with exports to the Community in the RIP, domestic sales of the like product were representative.
Za proizvajalca izvoznika z izvozom v Skupnost v OPP je bila domača prodaja podobnega izdelka reprezentativna.
Normal value was based on prices paid or payable, in the ordinary course of trade, by independent customers in Malaysia, in accordance with Article 2(1) of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost je temeljila na cenah, ki so jih neodvisne stranke v Maleziji plačevale ali jih plačujejo v običajnem poteku trgovine v skladu s členom 2(1) osnovne uredbe.
The investigation revealed that the company's reported cost of manufacturing was underestimated as factory overhead costs (including depreciation, rent expenses, salaries and maintenance) actually incurred during the RIP were reclassified to SG&A expenses.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so bili proizvodni stroški družbe podcenjeni kot režijski stroški tovarne (vključno z amortizacijo, stroški najemnin, plač in vzdrževanja), ki so dejansko nastali v OPP in so bili prerazporejeni v PSA-stroške.
The company argued that this practise was made in order to reflect the low capacity utilisation rate of its production facilities.
Družba je trdila, da je to prakso izvajala zato, da bi se odrazila nizka stopnja izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti njenih proizvodnih obratov.
However, actual costs incurred do also include the reclassified factory overhead costs.
Kakor koli, dejanski nastali stroški vključujejo tudi prerazporejene režijske stroške tovarne.
The fact that the company operated at a fraction of its full capacity of production does not mean that costs arising from such facilities are not incurred.
Dejstvo, da je družba uporabila le del svoje polne zmogljivosti proizvodnje, ne pomeni, da te zmogljivosti niso povzročile stroškov.
Indeed, such costs were listed in the company's accounting records and since they were directly linked to production of the like product, a correction of the reported cost of manufacturing had to be completed.
Taki stroški so bili dejansko navedeni v računovodskih evidencah družbe in ker so bili neposredno povezani s proizvodnjo podobnega izdelka, je bilo treba dopolniti popravek sporočenih proizvodnih stroškov.
For the same exporting producer, export prices were established on the basis of the prices actually paid by unrelated customers in the Community in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Za istega proizvajalca izvoznika so bile izvozne cene ugotovljene na podlagi cen, ki so jih nepovezane stranke dejansko plačale v Skupnosti v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
To ensure a fair comparison, allowances were made for differences in transport, insurance, handling, loading and ancillary cost and credit costs where applicable and justified.
Da bi zagotovili pošteno primerjavo, so bili izvedeni popravki za razlike v stroških prevoza in zavarovanja, manipulativnih stroških, stroških natovarjanja in tozadevnih stroških ter stroških kredita, kjer je bilo to primerno in utemeljeno.
To calculate the dumping margin, the weighted average normal values were compared to the weighted average export price to the Community of the product concerned.
Za izračun stopnje dampinga so se tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti primerjale s tehtano povprečno ceno izvoza v Skupnost za zadevni izdelek.
This comparison showed the existence of dumping of around 5 % for the one exporting producer that exported to the Community in the RIP.
Ta primerjava je pokazala obstoj približno 5-odstotnega dampinga za enega proizvajalca izvoznika, ki je v OPP izvažal v Skupnost.
It is recalled that the interim review was limited to dumping as concerns Daehan Synthetic Fiber Co. Ltd, SK Chemicals Co. Ltd and KP Chemicals Corp. Full questionnaire replies were received from these three companies.
Treba je opozoriti, da je bil vmesni pregled omejen na damping pri družbah Daehan Synthetic Fiber Co Ltd., SK Chemicals Co Ltd. in KP Chemicals Corp. Te tri družbe so poslale v celoti izpolnjene vprašalnike.
Moreover, companies related to one of the aforementioned exporting producers also made themselves known.
Poleg tega so se javile tudi družbe, povezane z enim od prej omenjenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Thus, questionnaire replies were also received from the exporting producers Honam Petrochemicals and Huvis Corp.
Tako sta tudi proizvajalca izvoznika Honam Petrochemicals in Huvis Corp izpolnila vprašalnika.
Prior to the on-the-spot investigation, Daehan Synthetic Fiber Co Ltd. informed the Commission of its decision to cease the production of PET in the Republic of Korea.
Pred preverjanjem na kraju samem je Daehan Synthetic Fiber Co Ltd. obvestil Komisijo o svoji odločitvi, da preneha proizvodnjo PET v Republiki Koreji.
Consequently, the company decided to cancel the planned verification visit.
Zato se je družba odločila, da odpove načrtovani preveritveni obisk.
Since this company thus failed to cooperate within the meaning of Article 18 of the basic Regulation, it should be subject to the residual dumping margin.
Ker ta družba tako ni sodelovala v smislu člena 18 osnovne uredbe, bi morala zanjo veljati preostala stopnja dampinga.
Out of the other five non-cooperating producers, one had cooperated with the Commission in the original investigation.
Od drugih petih nesodelujočih proizvajalcev je eden sodeloval s Komisijo v prvotni preiskavi.
The export volumes of the four cooperating exporting producers plus the unverified quantities exported by Daehan Synthetic Fiber Co. Ltd. represented close to 100 % of all Korean exports during the RIP from the Republic of Korea to the Community as recorded by Eurostat.
Obseg izvoza štirih sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov plus nepreverjene količine, ki jih je izvozila družba Daehan Synthetic Fiber Co Ltd., je predstavljal skoraj 100 % vsega korejskega izvoza v OPP iz Republike Koreje v Skupnost, ki ga je zabeležil Eurostat.
As seen from recitals 16 and 17, the four cooperating exporting producers that fully cooperated in the investigation were the following:
Kot je razvidno iz uvodnih izjav (16) in (17), so bili štirje sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki, ki so v celoti sodelovali v preiskavi, naslednji:
Huvis Corp., Seoul (related to SK Chemicals Co. Ltd),
Huvis Corp., Seoul (povezan s SK Chemicals Co Ltd.),
Honam Petrochemicals Corp., Seoul (related to KP Chemicals Co. Ltd).
Honam Petrochemicals Corp., Seoul (povezan s KP Chemicals Co Ltd).
In order to avoid any circumvention in the future, dumping margins have been calculated on a group-wide basis.
Da bi v prihodnje preprečili morebitno izogibanje, so bile stopnje dampinga izračunane na ravni skupine.
For all types of PET exported by the Korean exporting producers, it was possible to establish normal value on the basis of the prices paid or payable in the ordinary course of trade by independent customers on the domestic market, in accordance with Article 2(1) of the basic Regulation.
Za vse vrste PET, ki so jih izvažali korejski proizvajalci izvozniki, je bilo normalno vrednost mogoče določiti na podlagi cen, ki so jih plačevale ali jih plačujejo neodvisne stranke na domačem trgu, v skladu s členom 2(1) osnovne uredbe.
Two of the Korean exporting producers made export sales to the Community directly to independent customers, via related companies located in the Republic of Korea and related importers located in the Community.
Dva korejska proizvajalca izvoznika sta v Skupnost izvažala neposredno neodvisnim strankam prek povezanih družb v Republiki Koreji in povezanih uvoznikov v Skupnosti.
Consequently, in the latter situation, a constructed export price has been established pursuant to Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bila v tem primeru konstruirana izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
Allowances for differences in transport, insurance, handling charges, commissions, credit, packing, customs duties (duty drawback) and bank charges have been granted where justified and duly supported by evidence.
Popravki za razlike v prevoznih stroških, stroških zavarovanja, manipulativnih stroških, stroških provizij, kredita, pakiranja, carin (vračila dajatev) in bančnih stroških so bili odobreni, kjer je bilo to upravičeno in ustrezno podprto z dokazi.
Allowance for duty draw back and credit cost
Popravek za vračila dajatev in stroške kredita
Two of the Korean exporting producers made a claim for duty drawback on the grounds that import charges were borne by the like product when intended for consumption in the exporting country but were refunded when the product was sold for export to the Community.
Dva korejska proizvajalca izvoznika sta zahtevala povračilo dajatev z utemeljitvijo, da so uvozne dajatve bremenile podobni izdelek, ko je bil namenjen za potrošnjo v državi izvoznici, vendar so bile povrnjene, ko je bil izdelek izvožen v Skupnost.
In each case, the amount claimed was found to be higher than the amount of duty borne by the like product in the domestic market and therefore, the allowances were adjusted accordingly.
V obeh primerih je bilo ugotovljeno, da je zahtevani znesek višji od zneska dajatve za podobni izdelek na domačem trgu, zato so bili popravki ustrezno prilagojeni.
The methodology used in the present investigation was compatible with the conditions set out in Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation in so far as it accurately reflected the actual import level of duties borne by the like product.
Metodologija, uporabljena v sedanji preiskavi, je bila združljiva s pogoji, določenimi v členu 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe, če je točno odražala dejansko raven uvoznih dajatev za podobni izdelek.
In addition, both exporting producers claimed credit costs on the basis of the actual credit period taken by customers under the ‘open account’ payment system used on the Korean domestic market.
Poleg tega sta oba proizvajalca izvoznika zahtevala stroške kredita na podlagi dejanskega obdobja kreditiranja, ki so si ga stranke uveljavile na podlagi plačilnega sistema „odprtega računa“, ki se uporablja na korejskem domačem trgu.
It was found that under such a system, generally, the exporting producers did not actually grant specific credit periods and furthermore, the credit periods taken could not be accurately determined, as receipts could not be linked to specific invoices.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da proizvajalca izvoznika po tem sistemu večinoma nista dejansko odobrila nobenega posebnega obdobja kreditiranja, poleg tega pa obdobij kreditiranja ni bilo mogoče natančno določiti, ker se prejemkov ni dalo povezati z posebnimi računi.
In these circumstances, these allowances could not be granted.
V teh okoliščinah teh popravkov ni bilo mogoče odobriti.
As provided by Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation, the weighted average normal values of each type of the product concerned exported to the Community were compared to the weighted average export price of each corresponding type of the product concerned.
Kot je predvideno v členu 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe, so se tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti vsake vrste zadevnega izdelka, izvožene v Skupnost, primerjale s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno vsake ustrezne vrste zadevnega izdelka.
This comparison showed the existence of de minimis dumping for the exporting producers that exported to the Community in the RIP.
Ta primerjava je pokazala obstoj dampinga de minimis za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki so v OPP izvažali v Skupnost.
Two out of four known exporting producers cooperated with the investigation.
V preiskavi sta sodelovala dva od štirih znanih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.