natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Holder: [Organisation issuing the permit to fly]
Nosilec: [Organizacija, ki je izdala dovoljenje za letenje]
Authorised signature:
Podpis pooblaščene osebe:
Approval Reference No:
Referenčna št. potrdila:
EASA Form 20b
Obrazec EASA 20b
For use by Organisation Approval holder.
Za uporabo nosilca potrdila organizacije.
Sheet B of EASA Form 55 is replaced by the following:
List B Obrazca EASA 55 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Competent authority of a Member State of the European Union or EASA
„Pristojni organ države članice Evropske unije ali EASA
Terms of Approval
Pogoji odobritve
This document is part of Production Organisation Approval No NAA.21G.XXXX issued to
Ta dokument je del potrdila proizvodne organizacije številka NAA.21G.XXXX, izdanega
Company name:
Naziv podjetja
Section 1.
Oddelek 1.
SCOPE OF WORK:
OBSEG DELA
PRODUCTION OF
PROIZVODNJA
PRODUCTS/CATEGORIES
IZDELKI/KATEGORIJE
For details and limitations refer to the Production Organisation Exposition, Section xxx
Za podrobnosti in omejitve si pomagajte s Predstavitvijo proizvodne organizacije, oddelek xxx.
Section 2.
Oddelek 2.
LOCATIONS:
LOKACIJE:
Section 3.
Oddelek 3.
PRIVILEGES:
UGODNOSTI:
[keep only applicable text]
[Obdržite samo veljavno besedilo]
Prior to approval of the design of the product an EASA Form 1 may be issued only for conformity purposes.
Pred odobritvijo projekta za proizvod se lahko za namene skladnosti izda Obrazec EASA 1.
A Statement of Conformity may not be issued for a non-approved aircraft.
Izjava o skladnosti se v primeru neodobrenega zrakoplova lahko ne izda.
Maintenance may be performed, until compliance with maintenance regulations is required, in accordance with the Production Organisation Exposition Section xxx.
Vzdrževanje je mogoče izvajati, vse dokler je potrebna skladnost s predpisi glede vzdrževanja, v skladu z oddelkom xxx Predstavitve proizvodne organizacije.
Permits to fly may be issued in accordance with the Production Organisation Exposition Section yyy.
Dovoljenja za letenje se lahko izdajo v skladu z oddelkom yyy Predstavitve proizvodne organizacije.
Date of original issue:
Datum prvotne izdaje:
Date of this issue:
Datum te izdaje:
For the competent authority or EASA
Za pristojni organ ali EASA
EASA Form 55 — POA Certificate of Approval — Sheet B
Obrazec EASA 55 – Potrdilo o odobritvi POA – List B
The Production Organisation is entitled to exercise, within its Terms of Approval and in accordance with the procedures of its Production Organisation Exposition, the privileges set forth in 21A.163.
Proizvodna organizacija ima pravico do izvajanja, v okviru svojih pogojev odobritve in v skladu s postopki predstavitve proizvodne organizacije, ugodnosti, določenih v 21A.163.
Subject to the following:
Veljajo naslednji pogoji:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 376/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 376/2007
amending Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2042/2003 o stalni plovnosti zrakoplovov in letalskih proizvodov, delov in naprav ter o potrjevanju organizacij in osebja, ki se ukvarjajo s temi nalogami
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2002 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency [1] and in particular Articles 5 and 6 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1592/2002 z dne 15. julija 2002 o skupnih predpisih na področju civilnega letalstva in ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost v letalstvu [1] ter zlasti členov 5 in 6 Uredbe,
Until 28 March 2007, in a transition period during which Member States were fully responsible for all aspects related to the issuance of permit to fly, Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 [2] did not apply to the aircraft flying under such a permit and those aircrafts were therefore maintained in accordance with applicable national rules.
V prehodnem obdobju do 28. marca 2007, v katerem so bile države članice v celoti odgovorne za vse vidike v zvezi z izdajanjem dovoljenja za letenje, se Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2042/2003 [2] ni uporabljala za zrakoplove, ki so leteli na podlagi tega dovoljenja, in ti zrakoplovi so bili zato vzdrževani v skladu z veljavnimi nacionalnimi pravili.
Due to the nature of permits to fly which are issued on a case by case basis for aircraft which cannot comply with the rules for issuance of certificates of airworthiness for various reasons, it is impossible to establish general rules for the maintenance of those aircrafts.
Zaradi narave dovoljenj za letenje, ki se izdajo na podlagi posameznega primera za zrakoplove, ki zaradi različnih razlogov ne morejo izpolnjevati pravil za izdajo spričeval o plovnosti, je nemogoče določiti splošna pravila za vzdrževanje teh letal.
Instead the applicable maintenance provisions should be defined in the flight conditions approved for the particular case.
Namesto tega je treba v pogojih za letenje, odobrenih v posameznem primeru, opredeliti veljavne določbe o vzdrževanju.
It is necessary to complement the adoption of new requirements and administrative procedures in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1702/2003 of 24 September 2003, laying down implementing rules for the airworthiness and environmental certification of aircraft and related products, parts and appliances, as well as for the certification of design and production organisations [3], with regard to the issuance of permits to fly, by amending Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003, in order to exempt the aircraft operating under a permit to fly from the application of that Regulation and referring instead to the maintenance provisions contained in the approved flight conditions associated with the permit to fly.
Sprejetje novih zahtev in upravnih postopkov v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1702/2003 z dne 24. septembra 2003 o določitvi izvedbenih določb za certificiranje zrakoplovov in sorodnih proizvodov, delov in naprav glede plovnosti in okoljske ustreznosti ter potrjevanje projektivnih in proizvodnih organizacij [3] glede izdaje dovoljenj za letenje je treba dopolniti s spremembo Uredbe (ES) št. 2042/2003, da se izvzame zrakoplov, ki obratuje na podlagi dovoljenja za letenje, iz uporabe navedene uredbe in se namesto tega uvede sklicevanje na določbe o vzdrževanju, vsebovane v odobrenih pogojih za letenje, povezanih z dovoljenjem za letenje.
Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 2042/2003 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are based on the opinion issued by the European Aviation Safety Agency [4] in accordance with Articles 12(2)(b) and 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002.
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, temeljijo na mnenjih, ki jih je Agencija za varnost v letalstvu [4] izdala v skladu s členom 12(2)(b) in členom 14(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1592/2002.
In Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003, Article 3(3) is replaced by the following:
V Uredbi (ES) št. 2042/2003 se člen 3(3) nadomesti z naslednjim:
By derogation from paragraph 1, the continuing airworthiness of aircraft holding a permit to fly shall be ensured on the basis of the specific continuing airworthiness arrangements as defined in the permit to fly issued in accordance with the Annex (Part 21) to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1702/2003.’.
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 se stalna plovnost zrakoplovov, ki imajo dovoljenje za letenje, zagotovi s posebnimi nadaljnjimi ureditvami glede plovnosti, kot je določeno v dovoljenju za letenje, izdanemu v skladu s Prilogo (del 21) k Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1702/2003.“
Opinion 02-2007.
Mnenje 02-2007.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 377/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 377/2007
Pursuant to those general rules, the goods described in column 1 of the table set out in the Annex should be classified under the CN code indicated in column 2, by virtue of the reasons set out in column 3.
V skladu z navedenimi splošnimi pravili je treba blago, opisano v stolpcu 1 preglednice iz priloge, uvrstiti pod oznako KN, navedeno v stolpcu 2, zaradi utemeljitev, navedenih v stolpcu 3.
The goods described in column 1 of the table set out in the Annex shall be classified within the Combined Nomenclature under the CN code indicated in column 2.
Blago, opisano v stolpcu 1 preglednice iz priloge, se uvršča v kombinirano nomenklaturo pod oznako KN iz stolpca 2 preglednice.
Hazelnut preparation consisting of a mixture of hazelnuts and sugar, presented in the form of grains (% by weight) [1],
Lešnikov pripravek, sestavljen iz mešanice lešnikov in sladkorja v obliki granulata (v masnih % ), [1]
Hazelnut kernels
lešnikova jedrca
Added sugar
dodan sladkor
Hazelnuts kernels are roasted at 140 °C for 20 to 25 minutes.
Lešnikova jedrca se pražijo 20–25 minut pri 140 °C.
Sugar is roasted separately at the same temperature for 15 to 17 minutes.
Sladkor se ločeno praži 15–17 minut pri isti temperaturi.
Roasted hazelnuts and sugar are then mixed and roasted together for 12 to 15 minutes.
Praženi lešniki in sladkor se nato zmešajo in skupaj pražijo še 12–15 minut.
The preparation is then cooled and chopped into a particle size of 1 to 4 mm. It is then packed in bags of at least 10 kg for wholesale.
Nato se pakira po najmanj 10 kg v vreče za prodajo na veliko.
This preparation is an intermediate product not intended for immediate consumption but used in the manufacture of chocolates, ice-cream, confectionery and pastry.
Pripravek je vmesni proizvod, ki ni primeren za takojšnje uživanje, temveč se uporablja pri proizvodnji čokolade, sladoleda, sladic in peciva.
Classification is determined by General Rules 1 and 6 on the interpretation of the CN, the wording of CN codes 2008, 200819 and 20081919.
Uvrstitev opredeljujeta splošni pravili 1 in 6 za razlago kombinirane nomenklature in besedilo oznak KN 2008, 200819 in 20081919.
This product is not classified in Chapter 17 because it is a sweetened food preparation consisting of a mixture of hazelnuts and sugar (HSEN to Chapter 17, General, paragraph (b)).
Proizvod ni uvrščen v poglavje 17, ker gre za sladkan prehrambeni pripravek, sestavljen iz mešanice lešnikov in sladkorja (pojasnjevalne opombe HS k poglavju 17, splošno, odstavek (b)).
Heading 1704 does not apply to this sweetened hazelnut preparation as it is not marketed or intended for use as sugar confectionery in its own right (HSEN to heading 1704, first paragraph).
Tarifna številka 1704 se ne uporablja za tak sladkan lešnikov pripravek, saj se ne trži in ni namenjen uporabi kot samostojen sladkorni proizvod (pojasnjevalne opombe HS k tarifni številki 1704, prvi odstavek).
This product is covered by Chapter 20 as it is prepared or preserved by a process not specified in Chapter 8 (Note 1(a) to Chapter 20 and CNEN to subheadings 20081110 to 20081999).
Ta proizvod je zajet v poglavju 20, saj je pripravljen ali konzerviran po postopku, ki ni določen v poglavju 8 (opomba 1(a) k poglavju 20 in pojasnjevalne opombe KN k tarifnim podštevilkam 20081110 do 20081999).
Being nuts mixed with sugar and having undergone a preparation (roasting), this product is classified in subheading 20081919 (CNEN to subheadings 20081110 to 20081999).
Pripravek pridobljen s praženjem mešanice lešnikov in sladkorja se uvršča pod tarifno podštevilko 20081919 (pojasnjevalne opombe KN k tarifnim podštevilkam 20081110 do 20081999).
Hazelnut preparation consisting of a mixture of hazelnuts and sugar, presented in the form of powder (% by weight) [2],
Lešnikov pripravek, sestavljen iz mešanice lešnikov in sladkorja v obliki prahu (v masnih %), [2]
The preparation is then cooled and chopped into a particle size of 1 to 4 mm before being ground to a size of 20 to 30 microns.
Pripravek se nato ohladi in seseklja na delce velikosti 1–4 milimetre, preden se zmelje na velikost 20–30 mikronov.
It is then packed in bags of at least 12,5 kg for wholesale.
Nato se pakira po najmanj 12,5 kg v vreče za prodajo na veliko.
Heading 1704 does not apply to this preparation, as it is a semi-manufactured product, which is not transformed solely into a certain type of sugar confectionery of this heading (HSEN to heading 1704, first paragraph and CNEN to subheadings 17049051 to 17049099, 2nd paragraph).
Tarifna številka 1704 se ne uporablja za ta pripravek, saj gre za polizdelek, ki ni neposredno predelan v določeno vrsto sladkornega proizvoda te tarifne številke (pojasnjevalne opombe HS k tarifni številki 1704 prvi odstavek, in pojasnjevalne opombe KN k tarifnim podštevilkam 17049051 do 17049099, drugi odstavek).
Hazelnut preparation consisting of a mixture of hazelnuts and sugar, presented in the form of paste (% by weight) [3],
Lešnikov pripravek, sestavljen iz mešanice lešnikov in sladkorja v obliki paste (v masnih %), [3]
The ground preparation is mixed until it reaches the form of a homogeneous paste.
S pomočjo mešanja zmletega pripravka dobimo homogeno pasto.
It is then packed in bags of at least 20 kg for wholesale.
Nato se pakira po najmanj 20 kg v vreče za prodajo veliko.
Heading 1704 does not apply to this preparation, as it is a semi-manufactured product, which is not transformed solely into a certain type of sugar confectionery of this heading (HSEN to heading 1704, first paragraph, ix, and CNEN to subheadings 17049051 to 17049099, 2nd paragraph).
Tarifna številka 1704 se ne uporablja za ta pripravek, saj gre za polizdelek, ki ni neposredno predelan v določeno vrsto sladkornega proizvoda te tarifne številke (pojasnjevalne opombe HS k tarifni številki 1704 prvi odstavek, in pojasnjevalne opombe KN k tarifnim podštevilkam 17049051 do 17049099, drugi odstavek).
Being nuts mixed with sugar and having undergone a preparation (roasting), this product is classified in subheading 20081919 (CNEN to headings 20081110 to 20081999).
Pripravek pridobljen s praženjem mešanice lešnikov in sladkorja se uvršča pod tarifno podštevilko 20081919 (pojasnjevalne opombe KN k tarifnim podštevilkam 20081110 do 20081999).
Photograph No 1
Fotografija št. 1
Photograph No 2
Fotografija št. 2
Photograph No 3
Fotografija št. 3
Photograph No 1 is purely for information.
Fotografija št. 1 je zgolj informativnega značaja.
Photograph No 2 is purely for information.
Fotografija št. 2 je zgolj informativnega značaja.
Photograph No 3 is purely for information.
Fotografija št. 3 je zgolj informativnega značaja.
Council Regulation (EC) No 378/2007
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 378/2007
laying down rules for voluntary modulation of direct payments provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005
o pravilih za prostovoljno modulacijo neposrednih plačil, predvidenih v Uredbi (ES) št. 1782/2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete ter o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005
Certain Member States are facing particular difficulties in financing their rural development programmes pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) [1].
Nekatere države članice se pri financiranju programov razvoja podeželja v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1698/2005 z dne 20. septembra 2005 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) [1] srečujejo s posebnimi težavami.
With a view to strengthening their rural development policy, these Member States should be given the possibility to apply a system of voluntary modulation.
Zaradi okrepitve njihove politike razvoja podeželja bi bilo treba tem državam članicam dati možnost, da uporabijo sistem prostovoljne modulacije.
This possibility should be offered to those Member States where voluntary modulation is already applied according to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1655/2004 of 22 September 2004 laying down rules for the transition from the optional modulation system established by Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1259/1999 to the mandatory modulation system established by Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 [2], or which were granted a derogation by virtue of Article 70(4a) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 from the requirement to co-finance Community support.
To možnost bi bilo treba nuditi tistim državam članicam, v katerih se prostovoljna modulacija že uporablja v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1655/2004 z dne 22. septembra 2004 o določitvi pravil za prehod iz sistema izbirne modulacije, določenega v členu 4 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1259/1999, v sistem obvezne modulacije, kot je določen z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 [2] ali pa jim je bilo na podlagi člena 70(4a) Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 odobreno odstopanje od zahteve za sofinanciranje podpore Skupnosti.
The voluntary modulation should take the form of reducing direct payments within the meaning of Article 2(d) of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 [3], using the funds corresponding to that reduction for the financing of rural development programmes pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005.
Prostovoljna modulacija naj bi bila v obliki zmanjšanja neposrednih plačil v smislu člena 2(d) Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 [3] z uporabo sredstev, ki ustrezajo navedenemu zmanjšanju za financiranje programov razvoja podeželja v skladu z Uredbo(ES) št. 1698/2005.
Reductions of direct payments applied in respect of voluntary modulation should be additional to those resulting from the application of compulsory modulation provided for in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003.
Zmanjšanja neposrednih plačil, uporabljenih za prostovoljno modulacijo, bi bilo treba dodati zmanjšanjem, ki so posledica uporabe obvezne modulacije, kot je določena v členu 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003.
In order to facilitate its administrative implementation, the rules applicable to voluntary modulation should be aligned to those applicable to compulsory modulation under Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, including the calculation basis.
Da bi olajšali njeno upravno izvajanje, bi bilo treba pravila, ki se uporabljajo za prostovoljno modulacijo, uskladiti s pravili, ki se uporabljajo za obvezno modulacijo iz člena 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003, vključno z osnovo za izračun.
In order to take account of the particular situation of small farmers, an additional amount of aid should be granted in case of application of voluntary modulation as is the case for compulsory modulation.
Da bi upoštevali poseben položaj majhnih kmetov, bi bilo treba v primeru uporabe prostovoljne modulacije dodeliti dodaten znesek pomoči, kar velja tudi v primeru obvezne modulacije.
That additional amount should be equal to the amount resulting from the application of voluntary modulation to the first EUR 5000 of direct payments, within ceilings to be fixed by the Commission.
Navedeni dodaten znesek bi moral biti enak znesku, ki nastane pri uporabi prostovoljne modulacije na prvih 5000 EUR neposrednih plačil, znotraj zgornjih mej, ki jih določi Komisija.
With regard to Member States where voluntary modulation is already used, the new voluntary modulation arrangements laid down in this Regulation should, to the extent possible, refrain from deviating from the existing mechanism so as to avoid triggering unnecessary administrative burden, interfering with implementing arrangements that have been in place for several years and that farmers have adapted to in practice and in economic terms.
Kar zadeva države članice, v katerih se prostovoljna modulacija že uporablja, bi se moral novi sistem prostovoljne modulacije, določen v tej uredbi, v največji možni meri vzdržati odstopanja od obstoječega mehanizma, da se prepreči nastanek nepotrebnih upravnih obremenitev, ki bi posegale v izvedbene postopke, ki se uporabljajo že več let in katerim so se kmetje prilagodili v praksi in v gospodarskem smislu.
Therefore, it appears to be appropriate that Member States applying voluntary modulation upon the entry into force of this Regulation be given the right to maintain certain well-established patterns of their current system, whilst avoiding unjustified unequal treatment between farmers.
Zato se zdi primerno, da se državam članicam, ki začnejo uporabljati prostovoljno modulacijo ob začetku veljavnosti te uredbe, omogoči pravica do ohranitve nekaterih dobro utečenih vzorcev njihovih obstoječih sistemov, ob izogibanju neupravičene neenake obravnave kmetov.
Moreover, to ensure the new arrangements to be consistent with the implementation patterns of the single payment scheme, the application of regionally differentiated voluntary modulation rates should only be available to Member States which apply the single payment scheme at regional level as foreseen in Article 58 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003.
Poleg tega bi se za zagotovitev skladnosti med novim sistemom in načinom izvajanja sheme enotnega plačila uporaba možnosti določitve različnih stopenj prostovoljne modulacije glede na posamezne regije smela omogočiti le državam članicam, ki uporabljajo shemo enotnega plačila na regionalni ravni, kakor je določena v členu 58 Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003.
The use of the funds resulting from the application of voluntary modulation may not be subject to the ceilings of the EAFRD contribution pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005.
Za porabo sredstev, ki izhajajo iz uporabe prostovoljne modulacije, ne smejo veljati zgornje meje prispevka EKSRP v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1698/2005.
Derogation from that Regulation should therefore be provided for.
Zato je treba določiti odstopanje od navedene uredbe.
The prefinancing arrangements applicable to the EAFRD pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy [4] should not apply to those funds.
Ureditev pred-financiranj, ki se uporablja za EKSRP v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1290/2005 z dne 21. junija 2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike [4], se za ta sredstva ne bi smela uporabljati.
In order to take informed decisions on the application of voluntary modulation, Member States should carry out thorough assessments of the potential impact of such modulation, in particular as regards the economic situation of the farmers subject to such modulation and the effect on their comparative position in the agricultural sector.
Za sprejemanje premišljenih odločitev o uporabi prostovoljne modulacije bi morale države članice opraviti temeljite presoje morebitnih vplivov takšne modulacije, zlasti kar zadeva ekonomski položaj kmetov, podvrženih takšni modulaciji, ter učinek na njihov primerjalni položaj v kmetijskem sektorju.
The impact of the implementation of voluntary modulation should be closely monitored by the Member States applying voluntary modulation.
Države članice, ki uporabljajo prostovoljno modulacijo, bi morale vplive izvajanja prostovoljne modulacije natančno spremljati.
The Commission should be informed about the impact assessment and the monitoring results with a view to any further policy developments.
Komisijo bi bilo treba obveščati o presoji vplivov in rezultatih spremljanja zaradi morebitnega nadaljnjega razvoja te politike.
Voluntary modulation should be considered in the broader context of Community funding for rural development.
Prostovoljno modulacijo bi bilo treba obravnavati v širšem kontekstu financiranja razvoja podeželja s strani Skupnosti.
Its contribution should be analysed among others in the light of Member States' impact assessments.
Njen prispevek bi bilo treba med drugim analizirati v luči presoj vplivov, ki jih opravijo države članice.
Based on this analysis, the Commission will submit before the end of 2008 a report to the European Parliament and to the Council presenting the experience gained so far with its implementation.
Na podlagi te analize bo Komisija pred koncem leta 2008 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predložila poročilo, v katerem bo predstavila do sedaj pridobljene izkušnje na področju izvajanja prostovoljne modulacije.