natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Bromuconazole shall not be included as active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Bromukonazol se ne vključi kot aktivna snov v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
authorisations for plant protection products containing bromuconazole are withdrawn by 3 May 2009;
se registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo bromukonazol, prekličejo do 3. maja 2009;
no authorisations for plant protection products containing bromuconazole are granted or renewed from the date of publication of this Decision.
se od datuma objave te odločbe nobene registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo bromukonazol, ne odobrijo ali podaljšajo.
Any period of grace granted by Member States in accordance with the provisions of Article 4(6) of Directive 91/414/EEC, shall be as short as possible and shall expire on 3 May 2010 at the latest.
Morebitno podaljšanje roka, ki ga odobrijo države članice v skladu z določbami člena 4(6) Direktive 91/414/EGS, je čim krajše in traja najpozneje do 3. maja 2010.
Done at Brussels, 3 November 2008.
V Bruslju, 3. novembra 2008
EFSA Scientific Report (2008) 136, Conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance bromuconazole, finalised 26 March 2008.
Znanstveno poročilo EFSA (2008) 136, Sklep o strokovnem pregledu ocene tveganja pesticidov z aktivno snovjo bromukonazol, pripravljen 26. marca 2008.
Political and Security Committee Decision EUPM/1/2008
Sklep EUPM/1/2008 Političnega in varnostnega odbora
concerning the appointment of the Head of Mission/Police Commissioner of the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina
o imenovanju vodje policijske misije/policijskega komisarja Policijske misije Evropske Unije (EUMP) v Bosni in Hercegovini
(2008/835/CFSP)
(2008/835/SZVP)
Having regard to Joint Action 2007/749/CFSP of 19 November 2007 on the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) [1], and in particular Article 10(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Skupnega ukrepa 2007/749/SZVP z dne 19. novembra 2007 o Policijski misiji Evropske unije (EUMP) v Bosni in Hercegovini [1] in zlasti člena 10(1) Skupnega ukrepa,
Under Article 10(1) of Joint Action 2007/749/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance with Article 25 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions, including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission/Police Commissioner.
Politični in varnostni odbor (PVO) je na podlagi člena 10(1) Skupnega ukrepa 2007/749/SZVP pooblaščen, da v skladu s členom 25 Pogodbe sprejema ustrezne odločitve vključno s sklepom o imenovanju vodje policijske misije/policijskega komisarja.
The Secretary-General/High Representative has proposed to the PSC that Mr Stefan FELLER should be appointed as Head of Mission of the EUPM,
Generalni sekretar/visoki predstavnik je PVO predlagal, da se za vodjo misije EUPM imenuje g. Stefan FELLER –
Mr Stefan FELLER is hereby appointed Head of Mission/Police Commissioner of the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina with effect from 1 November 2008.
Stefan FELLER se s 1. novembrom 2008 imenuje za vodjo policijske misije/policijskega komisarja Policijske misije Evropske unije (EUPM) v Bosni in Hercegovini.
It shall apply until 31 December 2009.
Uporablja se od 31. decembra 2009.
of 29 October 2008
z dne 29. oktobra 2008
authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified LLCotton25 (ACS-GHØØ1-3) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o odobritvi dajanja na trg proizvodov, ki vsebujejo gensko spremenjeni bombaž LLCotton25 (ACS-GHØØ1-3), so iz njega sestavljeni ali proizvedeni, v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1829/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(notified under document number C(2008) 6204)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 6204)
On 3 March 2005, Bayer CropScience AG submitted to the competent authority of the Netherlands an application, in accordance with Articles 5 and 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, for the placing on the market of foods, food ingredients, and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from LLCotton25 (the application).
Bayer CropScience AG je 3. marca 2005 v skladu s členoma 5 in 17 Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 pristojnim organom Nizozemske predložil vlogo za dajanje na trg živil, živilskih sestavin in krme, ki vsebujejo bombaž LLCotton25, so iz njega sestavljeni ali proizvedeni („vloga“).
The application also covers the placing on the market of other products containing or consisting of LLCotton25 for the same uses as any other cotton with the exception of cultivation.
Vloga prav tako zajema dajanje na trg drugih proizvodov, ki vsebujejo bombaž LLCotton25 ali so iz njega sestavljeni, za enake uporabe kot katera koli druga vrsta bombaža, razen za gojenje.
Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of Articles 5(5) and 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, it includes the data and information required by Annexes III and IV to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC [2] and information and conclusions about the risk assessment carried out in accordance with the principles set out in Annex II to Directive 2001/18/EC.
Zato vključuje vloga v skladu z določbami členov 5(5) in 17(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 podatke in informacije iz prilog III in IV k Direktivi 2001/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. marca 2001 o namernem sproščanju gensko spremenjenih organizmov v okolje in razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 90/220/EGS [2] ter informacije in sklepe ocene tveganja, ki je bila izvedena v skladu z načeli iz Priloge II k Direktivi 2001/18/ES.
On 16 April 2007, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) gave a favourable opinion in accordance with Articles 6 and 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and concluded that it is unlikely that the placing on the market of the products containing, consisting of, or produced from LLCotton25 as described in the application (the products) will have any adverse effects on human or animal health or the environment in the context of their intended uses [3].
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane („EFSA“) je 16. aprila 2007 dala ugodno mnenje v skladu s členoma 6 in 18 Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 in sklenila, da ni verjetno, da bo dajanje na trg proizvodov, ki vsebujejo bombaž LLCotton25, so iz njega sestavljeni ali proizvedeni, kakor je opisano v vlogi („proizvodi“), imelo škodljive učinke na zdravje ljudi ali živali ali na okolje v okviru predvidenih uporab [3].
In its opinion, EFSA considered all the specific questions and concerns raised by the Member States in the context of the consultation of the national competent authorities as provided for by Articles 6(4) and 18(4) of that Regulation.
EFSA je v svojem mnenju preučila vsa specifična vprašanja in pomisleke držav članic v okviru posvetovanja z nacionalnimi pristojnimi organi, kakor je določeno v členih 6(4) in 18(4) navedene uredbe.
In particular, EFSA concluded that the comparative compositional analysis and agronomic analyses show that LLCottton25 is substantially equivalent to its non-genetically modified counterpart and, as a consequence, that no additional safety studies with laboratory animals (e.g. a 90-day toxicity study in rats) are needed.
EFSA je zlasti sklenila, da primerjalna analiza sestave in agronomske analize kažejo, da je bombaž LLCottton25 snovno enakovreden gensko nespremenjenemu bombažu in zato niso potrebne dodatne varnostne študije s poskusnimi živalmi (npr. 90-dnevna študija toksičnosti na podganah).
In its opinion, EFSA also concluded that the environmental monitoring plan, consisting of a general surveillance plan, submitted by the applicant is in line with the intended use of the products.
EFSA je v svojem mnenju tudi sklenila, da je načrt za spremljanje okolja, sestavljen iz splošnega načrta za spremljanje, ki ga je predložil vlagatelj, v skladu z nameravano uporabo proizvodov.
However, due to the physical characteristics of cotton seeds and methods of transportation, EFSA recommended that, within general surveillance, specific measures are introduced to actively monitor the occurrence of feral cotton plants in areas where seed spillage is likely to occur.
Vendar je EFSA zaradi fizikalnih značilnosti bombažnega semena in načinov prevoza priporočila, da se v okviru splošnega spremljanja uvedejo posebni ukrepi za dejavno spremljanje pojava divjih rastlin bombaža na območjih, kjer je verjetna razpršitev semena.
The monitoring plan submitted by the applicant has been modified to comply with this EFSA recommendation.
Načrt za spremljanje, ki ga je predložil vlagatelj, je bil usklajen s tem priporočilom EFSA.
Taking into account those considerations, authorisation should be granted for the products.
Ob upoštevanju navedenih vidikov je treba za proizvode izdati odobritev.
On the basis of the EFSA opinion, no specific labelling requirements other than those provided for in Articles 13(1) and 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, appear to be necessary for the foods, food ingredients and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from LLCotton25.
V skladu z mnenjem EFSA za živila, živilske sestavine in krmo, ki vsebujejo bombaž LLCotton25, so iz njega sestavljeni ali proizvedeni, niso potrebne nobene posebne zahteve za označevanje, razen tistih, določenih v členih 13(1) in 25(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003.
However, in order to ensure the use of the products within the limits of the authorisation provided by this Decision, the labelling of feed containing or consisting of the GMO and other products than food and feed containing or consisting of the GMO for which authorisation is requested should be complemented by a clear indication that the products in question must not be used for cultivation.
Vendar mora biti iz oznak krme, ki vsebuje gensko spremenjene organizme ali je sestavljena iz njih, ter drugih proizvodov, ki niso živila in krma ter vsebujejo ali so sestavljeni iz gensko spremenjenih organizmov, za katere je predložena vloga za odobritev, jasno razvidno, da se zadevni proizvodi ne smejo uporabljati za gojenje, tako da se zagotovi uporaba proizvodov v okviru odobritve iz te odločbe.
Similarly, the EFSA opinion does not justify the imposition of specific conditions or restrictions for the placing on the market and/or specific conditions or restrictions for the use and handling, including post-market monitoring requirements, or of specific conditions for the protection of particular ecosystems/environment and/or geographical areas, as provided for in point (e) of Articles 6(5) and 18(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
Na podlagi mnenja EFSA tudi ni utemeljena uvedba posebnih pogojev ali omejitev za dajanje na trg in/ali posebnih pogojev ali omejitev za uporabo in ravnanje, vključno z zahtevami za spremljanje po dajanju na trg, ali posebnih pogojev za zaščito posebnih ekosistemov/okolja in/ali geografskih območij, kakor je določeno v točki (e) člena 6(5) in točki (e) člena 18(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003.
This decision is to be notified through the Biosafety Clearing House to the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, pursuant to Articles 9(1) and 15(2)(c), of Regulation (EC) No 1946/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2003 on transboundary movements of genetically modified organisms [6].
O tej odločbi je treba prek Urada za izmenjavo informacij o biološki varnosti obvestiti pogodbenice Kartagenskega protokola biološke varnosti h Konvenciji o biološki raznovrstnosti v skladu s členom 9(1) in členom 15(2)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 1946/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. julija 2003 o čezmejnem gibanju gensko spremenjenih organizmov [6].
The Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health has not delivered an opinion within the time limit laid down by its Chairman; the Commission has therefore submitted a proposal to the Council on 30 April 2008 in accordance with Article 5 of the Council Decision 1999/468/EC [7], the Council being required to act within three months.
Stalni odbor za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ni dal mnenja v roku, ki ga je določil njegov predsednik; zato je Komisija 30. aprila 2008 Svetu predložila predlog v skladu s členom 5 Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES [7], Svet pa bi moral ukrepati v treh mesecih.
However, the Council has not acted within the required time limit; a Decision should now be adopted by the Commission,
Svet se ni odzval v zahtevanem roku; Komisija mora zato sprejeti odločbo –
Genetically modified cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) LLCotton25, as specified in point (b) of the Annex to this Decision, is assigned the unique identifier ACS-GHØØ1-3, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 65/2004.
Gensko spremenjenemu bombažu (Gossypium hirsutum) LLCotton25, kakor je opredeljen v točki (b) Priloge k tej odločbi, se dodeli enotni identifikator ACS-GHØØ1-3, kakor je določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 65/2004.
foods and food ingredients containing, consisting of, or produced from ACS-GHØØ1-3 cotton;
živila in živilske sestavine, ki vsebujejo bombaž ACS-GHØØ1-3, so iz njega sestavljeni ali proizvedeni;
feed containing, consisting of, or produced from ACS-GHØØ1-3 cotton;
krma, ki vsebuje bombaž ACS-GHØØ1-3, je iz njega sestavljena ali proizvedena;
products other than food and feed containing or consisting of ACS-GHØØ1-3 cotton for the same uses as any other cotton with the exception of cultivation.
proizvodi, ki niso živila in krma ter vsebujejo bombaž ACS-GHØØ1-3 ali so iz njega sestavljeni, za enako uporabo kot kateri koli drugi bombaž, razen za gojenje.
For the purposes of the labelling requirements laid down in Articles 13(1) and 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘cotton’.
Za namene zahtev za označevanje iz členov 13(1) in 25(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 ter člena 4(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1830/2003 je „ime organizma“„bombaž“.
The words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in documents accompanying products containing or consisting of ACS-GHØØ1-3 cotton referred to in Article 2(b) and (c).
Besede „ni za gojenje“ se navedejo na oznakah proizvodov in v dokumentih, priloženih k proizvodom, ki vsebujejo bombaž ACS-GHØØ1-3 ali so iz njega sestavljeni in so navedeni v členu 2(b) in (c).
The information in the Annex to this Decision shall be entered in the Community register of genetically modified food and feed, as provided for in Article 28 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
Informacije iz Priloge k tej odločbi se vnesejo v register Skupnosti za gensko spremenjena živila in krmo, kakor je določeno v členu 28 Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003.
The authorisation holder shall be Bayer CropScience AG.
Imetnik odobritve je Bayer CropScience AG.
This Decision is addressed to Bayer CropScience AG, Alfred-Nobel-Strasse 50, D-40789 Monheim am Rhein, Germany
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Bayer CropScience AG, Alfred-Nobel-Straße 50, D-40789 Monheim am Rhein, Nemčija
Done at Brussels, 29 October 2008.
V Bruslju, 29. oktobra 2008
Name Bayer CropScience AG
Ime Bayer CropScience AG
Address Alfred-Nobel-Strasse 50, D-40789 Monheim am Rhein, Germany .
Naslov Alfred-Nobel-Strasse 50, D–40789 Monheim am Rhein, Nemčija
The genetically modified ACS-GHØØ1-3 cotton, as described in the application, expresses the PAT protein which confers tolerance to the herbicide glufosinate-ammonium.
Gensko spremenjeni bombaž ACS-GHØØ1-3, kakor je opisan v vlogi, proizvaja beljakovino PAT, zaradi katere je odporen na herbicid glufosinat-amonij.
For the purposes of the specific labelling requirements laid down in Articles 13(1) and 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, and in Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, the ‘name of the organism’ shall be ‘cotton’.
Za namene zahtev za posebno označevanje iz členov 13(1) in 25(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 ter člena 4(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1830/2003, je „ime organizma“„bombaž“.
The words ‘not for cultivation’ shall appear on the label of and in documents accompanying products containing or consisting of ACS-GHØØ1-3 cotton referred to in Article 2(b) and (c) of this Decision.
Besede „ni za gojenje“ se navedejo na oznakah proizvodov in v dokumentih, priloženih k proizvodom, ki vsebujejo bombaž ACS-GHØØ1-3 ali so iz njega sestavljeni in so navedeni v členu 2(b) in (c) te odločbe.
event specific real-time PCR-based method for the quantification of ACS-GHØØ1-3 cotton,
Kvantitativna, za pojav specifična metoda, ki temelji na polimerazni verižni reakciji (PCR) v realnem času, za bombaž ACS-GHØØ1-3
validated on seeds by the Community reference laboratory established under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, published at http://gmo-crl.jrc.it/statusofdoss.htm
Na podlagi semen potrdi referenčni laboratorij Skupnosti, ustanovljen v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1829/2003, potrditev se objavi na spletni strani http://gmo-crl.jrc.it/statusofdoss.htm
reference material: AOCS 0306-A and AOCS 0306-E accessible via the American Oil Chemists Society at http://www.aocs.org/tech/crm/bayer_cotton.cfm
Referenčni material: AOCS 0306-A in AOCS 0306-B, na voljo pri American Oil Chemists Society (AOCS) na strani http://www.aocs.org/tech/crm/bayer_cotton.cfm
Biosafety Clearing House, Record ID: see [to be completed when notified].
Biosafety Clearing House (Posredovalnica informacij o biološki varnosti), številka zapisa: glej [izpolniti po obvestilu]
Monitoring plan for environmental effects conforming with Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC.
Načrt spremljanja učinkov na okolje v skladu s Prilogo VII k Direktivi 2001/18/ES
[Link: plan published on the Internet.]
[Povezava: načrt je objavljen na spletu]
Post-market monitoring requirements for the use of the food for human consumption:
Zahteve za spremljanje po dajanju na trg, kadar se uporabljajo kot živila za prehrano ljudi:
Note: Links to relevant documents may need to be modified over time.
Opomba: Povezave do ustreznih dokumentov bo treba sčasoma verjetno spremeniti.
concerning preventive vaccination against low pathogenic avian influenza in mallard ducks in Portugal and certain measures restricting the movements of such poultry and their products
o preventivnem cepljenju proti nizko patogeni aviarni influenci pri racah mlakaricah na Portugalskem in nekaterih ukrepih, ki omejujejo premike takšne perutnine in njenih proizvodov
(notified under document number C(2008) 6348)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 6348)
Having regard to Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC [1], and in particular Article 57(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2005/94/ES z dne 20. decembra 2005 o ukrepih Skupnosti za obvladovanje aviarne influence in razveljavitvi Direktive 92/40/EGS [1] ter zlasti člena 57(2) Direktive,
Directive 2005/94/EC sets out certain preventive measures relating to the surveillance and the early detection of avian influenza and increasing the level of the competent authorities’ and the farming community's awareness of, and preparation for, the risks of that disease.
Direktiva 2005/94/ES določa nekatere preventivne ukrepe v zvezi s sistematičnim nadzorom in zgodnjim odkrivanjem aviarne influence ter povečanjem ravni ozaveščenosti in pripravljenosti pristojnih organov in kmečkega prebivalstva na nevarnosti navedene bolezni.
A risk assessment carried out by Portugal identified that holdings keeping mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) intended for re-stocking supplies of game (mallard ducks) could pose a significant and immediate threat of spreading avian influenza within Portugal or into other Member States.
Portugalska je opravila oceno tveganja in ugotovila, da bi gospodarstva, ki gojijo race mlakarice (Anas platyrhynchos), namenjene za obnovo populacije divjih ptic („race mlakarice“), lahko pomenila veliko in takojšnjo nevarnost širjenja aviarne influence na Portugalskem ali v druge države članice.
Portugal decided therefore to introduce emergency vaccination in order to contain the outbreak.
Zato se je Portugalska odločila uvesti cepljenje v nujnih primerih, da bi obvladala izbruh.
Commission Decision 2008/285/EC [2] approved the emergency vaccination plan submitted by Portugal.
Z Odločbo Komisije 2008/285/ES [2] je bil potrjen načrt cepljenja v nujnih primerih, ki ga je predložila Portugalska.
That Decision also provided for certain measures to be applied in a holding where vaccinated mallard ducks are kept and in unvaccinated poultry holdings, including movement restrictions on vaccinated mallard ducks, their hatching eggs and mallard ducks hatched from such eggs in accordance with the approved vaccination plan.
Navedena odločba določa tudi nekatere ukrepe, ki se izvajajo na gospodarstvih, kjer se gojijo race mlakarice, in na gospodarstvih z necepljeno perutnino, vključno z omejitvami za premike cepljenih rac mlakaric, njihova valilna jajca ter race mlakarice iz takšnih jajc v skladu z odobrenim načrtom cepljenja.
The implementation of the emergency vaccination plan applied by Portugal has been completed by 31 July 2008.
Izvajanje načrta za cepljenje v nujnih primerih, ki ga je uporabila Portugalska, je bilo zaključeno 31. julija 2008.
In accordance with Article 8 of Decision 2008/285/EC, Portugal has submitted a report on the implementation of the emergency vaccination plan and has reported to the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health.
Portugalska je v skladu s členom 8 Odločbe 2008/285/ES predložila poročilo o izvajanju načrta cepljenja v nujnih primerih in je poročala Stalnemu odboru za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali.
On the basis of the information provided by Portugal, it appears that the outbreak has been successfully contained.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložila Portugalska, se zdi, da so bili izbruhi uspešno obvladani.
Based on a further risk assessment, Portugal deems that on the holding the high value mallard breeding ducks are still exposed to the potential risk of avian influenza infection, in particular by possible indirect contact with wild birds.
Na podlagi nadaljnje ocene tveganja Portugalska meni, da so dragocene vzrejne race mlakarice na gospodarstvih še vedno izpostavljene možnemu tveganju okužbe z aviarno influenco, predvsem pri možnem posrednem stiku z divjimi pticami.
Portugal has therefore decided to continue vaccination against avian influenza as a long-term measure by implementing a preventive vaccination plan on the holding at risk in the region of Lisboa e Vale do Tejo, Ribatejo Norte, Vila Nova da Barquinha that keeps such mallard ducks.
Zato se je Portugalska odločila nadaljevati s cepljenjem proti aviarni influenci kot dolgotrajnim ukrepom z izvajanjem načrta za preventivno cepljenje na gospodarstvu, izpostavljenemu tveganju, v regiji Lisboa e Vale do Tejo, Ribatejo Norte, Vila Nova da Barquinha, ki goji takšne race mlakarice.
Portugal has by letter dated 10 September 2008 submitted a preventive vaccination plan to the Commission for approval.
Zato je Portugalska v pismu z dne 10. septembra 2008 predložila Komisiji v odobritev načrt za preventivno cepljenje.
According to that preventive vaccination plan, Portugal intends to introduce preventive vaccination which is to be applied until 31 July 2009.
Portugalska namerava v skladu z navedenim načrtom za preventivno cepljenje uvesti preventivno cepljenje, ki se izvaja do 31. julija 2009.
In its scientific opinions on the use of vaccination to control avian influenza issued by the European Food Safety Authority in 2005 [3], 2007 [4] and 2008 [5], the Animal Health and Welfare Panel stated that emergency and preventive vaccination against avian influenza is a valuable tool to complement the control measures for that disease.
Svet za zdravje in dobro počutje živali je v svojih znanstvenih mnenjih o uporabi cepljenja za nadzor aviarne influence, ki jih je izdala Evropska agencija za varnost hrane leta 2005 [3], 2007 [4] in 2008 [5], navedel, da cepljenje v nujnih primerih in preventivno cepljenje proti aviarni influenci uspešno dopolnjujeta nadzorne ukrepe za navedeno bolezen.