natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As indicated above this aid is regarded as a grant received as of 1 January 2005 which should, as such, be recovered with interest as specified in recital (133) below.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, velja ta pomoč za subvencijo, prejeto od 1. januarja 2005, ki jo je kot tako treba povrniti z obrestmi, kot je podrobno določeno v uvodni izjavi 132 spodaj.
Given that this aid had similar effects to a debt waiver, the Commission could, however, accept that the Polish authorities proceed with recovery as if the original debt had been waived.
Ker je imela ta pomoč podobne učinke kot oprostitev dolga, bi Komisija lahko dopustila, da poljski organi nadaljujejo izterjavo, kot da je bil prvotni dolg oproščen.
The Commission would also find it acceptable, for the purpose of recovery, for any new debts of TB arising after 2004 to be disregarded, because some repayments were made by TB between the beginning of 2005 and August 2006 to public creditors which more or less neutralised the debts which arose after 2004 [67].
Zaradi izterjave bi bilo za Komisijo tudi sprejemljivo, če bi spregledali kakršne koli nove dolgove TB, nastale po letu 2004, saj je TB med začetkom leta 2005 in avgustom 2006 izvršil nekaj odplačil javnim upnikom, kar je bolj ali manj nevtraliziralo dolgove, nastale po letu 2004 [67].
As indicated in recital (36) above, TB’s total public debts after January 2005 never amounted to less than PLN 20,76 million and by August 2005 they had risen to PLN 22,7 million.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 36 zgoraj, skupni javni dolgovi TB po januarju 2005 nikoli niso bili manjši od 20,76 milijona PLN, do avgusta 2005 pa so se povečali na 22,7 milijona PLN.
As discussed above, repayment of the aid should take into account which companies actually benefited from it.
Kot je bilo obravnavano zgoraj, je treba pri povračilu pomoči upoštevati, katere družbe so dejansko imele korist od nje.
As regards the amount of PLN 20761643, it should be borne in mind that PLN 7,833 million was passed on to BA and PLN 14,81 million to HB (see recitals (117)-(118) above).
Glede zneska 20761643 PLN se je treba zavedati, da je bilo 7,833 milijona PLN prenesenih na BA, 14,81 milijona PLN pa na HB (glej uvodni izjavi 116 in 117 zgoraj).
As the sum of these amounts (PLN 22,643 million) exceeds the amount of aid received, recovery should be limited to the total amount of the aid.
Ker vsota teh zneskov (22,643 milijona PLN) presega znesek prejete pomoči, je treba povračilo omejiti na skupni znesek pomoči.
This limitation should be proportionate, i.e. BA, which received 34,6 % of the total identified benefit, should also pay 34,6 % of the amount to be recovered (PLN 7183528); the remaining 65,4 % (PLN 13578115) should be recovered from HB.
Ta omejitev mora biti sorazmerna, tj. BA, ki je prejel 34,6 % skupne ugotovljene pomoči, naj tudi plača 34,6 % zneska, ki ga je treba povrniti (7183528 PLN); preostalih 65,4 % (13578115 PLN) naj povrne HB.
Furthermore, the misused aid of PLN 1369186 received before 2002 should be recovered from TB, as there is no indication that this aid was passed on to other members of the TB group.
Poleg tega je treba od TB izterjati zlorabljeno pomoč v znesku 1369186 PLN, prejeto pred letom 2002, saj nič ne kaže, da je bila ta pomoč prenesena na druge člane skupine TB.
The amounts to be recovered shall bear interest calculated in accordance with the provisions of the Implementing Regulation.
Zneski, ki jih je treba povrniti, morajo vključevati obresti, izračunane v skladu z določbami Izvedbene uredbe.
In particular, under Article 9(4) of the Implementing Regulation, when five-year inter-bank swap rates are not available, the Commission may, in close cooperation with the Member State concerned, fix a State Aid recovery interest rate using a different method and on the basis of the information available to it.
S členom 9(4) Izvedbene uredbe je predvsem določeno, da lahko Komisija, kadar ni na voljo petletnih medbančnih menjalnih obrestnih mer, v tesnem sodelovanje z zadevno državo članico določi obrestno mero za povrnitev državne pomoči z uporabo drugačne metode in na podlagi informacij, ki so ji na voljo.
As five-year inter-bank swap rates were not available to Poland for the period when the incompatible aid was awarded, the recovery interest rate to be applied should be based on the available interest rate deemed appropriate for that period.
Ker Poljska ni imela na voljo petletnih medbančnih menjalnih obrestnih mer za obdobje, v katerem je bila dodeljena nezdružljiva pomoč, bo uporabljena obrestna mera za povrnitev temeljila na razpoložljivi obrestni meri, ki velja za ustrezno za navedeno obdobje.
To that end, reference may be made to the practice already established between Poland and the Commission [68],
Tu je mogoče sklicevanje na prakso, ki je že bila uveljavljena med Poljsko in Komisijo [68] –
The State Aid of PLN 20761643 unlawfully awarded by Poland to Technologie Buczek Group is in breach of Article 88(3) of the Treaty and is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč v znesku 20761643 PLN, ki jo je Poljska nezakonito dodelila skupini Technologie Buczek, pomeni kršitev člena 88(3) Pogodbe in ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The State Aid of PLN 1369186 awarded by Poland to Technologie Buczek Group between 1997 and 2003 has not been used in accordance with the conditions stipulated in Protocol No 8 to the Accession Treaty and is therefore incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč v znesku 1369186 PLN, ki jo je Poljska dodelila skupini Technologie Buczek med letoma 1997 in 2003, ni bila porabljena v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v Protokolu št. 8 k Pristopni pogodbi, in zato ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
Poland shall recover the aid referred to in Article 1 unlawfully made available to Technologie Buczek Group in particular from the subsidiaries Huta Buczek Sp. z o.o and Buczek Automotive Sp. z o.o, in proportion to the benefit actually obtained by them.
Poljska mora izterjati pomoč iz člena 1, ki je bila nezakonito omogočena skupini Technologie Buczek, zlasti od podružnic Huta Buczek Sp. z o.o in Buczek Automotive Sp. z o.o, sorazmerno s pomočjo, ki sta jo dejansko prejeli.
Accordingly, Poland shall recover PLN 13578115 from Huta Buczek Sp. z o.o and PLN 7183528 from Buczek Automotive Sp. z o.o.
Skladno s tem mora Poljska izterjati 13578115 PLN od družbe Huta Buczek Sp. z o.o in 7183528 PLN od družbe Buczek Automotive Sp. z.o.o.
Poland shall recover the misused aid referred to in Article 2 awarded to Technologie Buczek Group from Technologie Buczek S.A.
Poljska mora povrniti zlorabljeno pomoč iz člena 2, ki jo je skupini Technologie Buczek dodelila družba Technologie Buczek S.A.
The amounts to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were made available to the recipient until their actual recovery.
Zneski, ki jih je treba povrniti, morajo vključevati obresti od datuma, ko so bili zagotovljeni prejemniku, do njihove dejanske povrnitve.
Interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [69].
Obresti se izračunajo z uporabo obrestnoobrestnega računa v skladu s Poglavjem V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES [69].
Recovery of the aid referred to in Articles 1 and 2 shall be immediate and effective.
Pomoč iz členov 1 in 2 mora biti povrnjena takoj in učinkovito.
Poland shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months of the date of notification thereof.
Poljska zagotovi, da se ta odločba izvede v štirih mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tej odločbi.
Within two months of notification of this Decision, Poland shall submit the following information to the Commission:
V dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tej odločbi mora Poljska Komisiji predložiti naslednje informacije:
the total amount (principal and interest) to be recovered from the recipients;
skupni znesek (glavnica in obresti), ki ga je treba izterjati od prejemnikov;
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned with a view to complying with this Decision;
podroben opis že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepov za izpolnitev zahtev te odločbe;
documents demonstrating that the recipients have been ordered to repay the aid.
dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da je bilo prejemnikom naloženo, naj povrnejo pomoč.
Poland shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Articles 1 and 2 has been completed in full.
Poljska mora obveščati Komisijo o napredovanju nacionalnih ukrepov, sprejetih za izvedbo te odločbe, dokler ne bo pomoč, navedena v členih 1 in 2, v celoti povrnjena.
It shall immediately submit, at the request of the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned with a view to complying with this Decision.
Na zahtevo Komisije mora nemudoma predložiti informacije o sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepih za izpolnitev zahtev te odločbe.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and interest already recovered from the recipient.
Zagotoviti mora tudi podrobne informacije o zneskih pomoči in obrestih, ki so že bile izterjane od prejemnika.
OJ C 196, 19.8.2006, p. 23.
UL C 196, 19.8.2006, str. 23.
Assuming that EUR 1 = PLN 4.
Ob predpostavki 1 EUR = 4 PLN.
See for details Decision 2006/937/EC of 5.7.2005 in case C-20/04 Huta Czestochowa, (OJ L 366, 21.12.2006, p. 1, points 23 et seq).
Za podrobnosti glej Odločbo Komisije 2006/937/ES z dne 5. julija 2005 v zadevi C 20/04 Huta Czestochowa, (UL L 366, 21.12.2006, str. 1, točka 23 in naslednje).
State Aid to the steel sector is not allowed in the EU; see Communication from the Commission — Rescue and restructuring aid and closure aid for the steel sector (OJ C 70, 19.3.2002, p. 21).
Državna pomoč za jeklarski sektor v EU ni dovoljena; glej Sporočilo Komisije – Pomoč za reševanje in prestrukturiranje ter zaprtje za jeklarski sektor (UL C 70, 19.3.2002, str. 21).
See Protocol No 8 to the Accession Treaty on the restructuring of the Polish steel industry (OJ L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 948).
Glej Protokol št. 8 k Pristopni pogodbi o prestrukturiranju poljske jeklarske industrije (UL L 236, 23.9.2003, str. 948).
Hereinafter ‘independent monitoring reports’ referring to the year monitored.
V nadaljevanju „neodvisna poročila o spremljanju“, ki se nanašajo na navedeno leto.
See Annex B of the Multisectoral framework (OJ C 70, 19.3.2002, p. 8), which was replaced by Annex I to the Guidelines on national regional aid for 2007-2013 (OJ C 54, 4.3.2006, p. 13).
Glej Prilogo B k Večsektorskemu okviru (UL C 70, 19.3.2002, str. 8), ki je bila nadomeščena s Prilogo I k Smernicam o državni regionalni pomoči za 2007–2013 (UL C 54, 4.3.2006, str. 13).
Information on TB is taken from Huta Buczek's restructuring programme for 2002-2006 (hereinafter ‘2002 IBP’) of March 2002, which was the basis for approving aid following adoption of the NRP.
Informacije o TB so iz programa prestrukturiranja družbe Huta Buczek za obdobje 2002–2006 (v nadaljevanju „IPN 2002“) iz marca 2002, ki je bil podlaga za odobritev pomoči po sprejetju NPP.
For more information see the decision to initiate the procedure (footnote 2).
Za več informacij glej odločitev o sprožitvi postopka (opomba 2).
See 2002 IBP, p. 57.
Glej IPN 2002, str. 57.
See 2002 IBP, p. 74.
Glej IPN 2002, str. 74.
Fundusz Gwarantowanych Świadczeń Pracowniczych (Wage Guarantee Fund) is designed to ensure the payment of employees' claims in the event of an employer going bankrupt.
Fundusz Gwarantowanych Świadczeń Pracowniczych (Plačni jamstveni sklad) je namenjen za zagotavljanje izplačil zahtevkov zaposlenih, če gre delodajalec v stečaj.
See 2002 IBP, p. 30.
Glej IPN 2002, str. 30.
2004 Independent Monitoring Report, April 2005, p. 14.
Neodvisno poročilo o spremljanju 2004, april 2005, str. 14.
This was confirmed by the figures provided by Poland in its bi-annual monitoring report, e.g. for 2003, see OCCP Report No 2, Annex 5, p. 5.
To so potrdili podatki, ki jih je predložila Poljska v svojem poročilu o spremljanju, ki ga je pripravila dvakrat letno; npr. za leto 2003 glej Poročilo UKVP št. 2, Priloga 5, str. 5.
The fact that TB's 2005 business plan indicates a smaller amount which clearly excludes R&D is not acceptable.
Dejstvo, da poslovni načrt TB za leto 2005 navaja manjši znesek, ki jasno izključuje raziskave in razvoj, ni sprejemljivo.
Letter of 2 October 2006.
Dopis z dne 2. oktobra 2006.
See 2002 IBP, p. 73.
Glej IPN 2002, str. 73.
Letter from the Polish authorities of 23.1.2007.
Dopis poljskih organov z dne 23.1.2007.
See 2005 IBP, p. 69.
Glej IPN 2005, str. 69.
See 2003 Independent Monitoring Report, January 2004, p. 7.
Glej Neodvisno poročilo o spremljanju 2003, januar 2004, str. 7.
See fourth Polish report for 2004, March 2005, p. 168.
Glej 4. poljsko poročilo za leto 2004, marec 2005, str. 168.
See 2003 Independent Monitoring Report, January 2004.
Glej Neodvisno poročilo o spremljanju 2003, januar 2004.
See 2003 Independent Monitoring Report, January 2004, p. 16.
Glej Neodvisno poročilo o spremljanju 2003, januar 2004, str. 16.
In its 2004 report, it was even noted that the 2003 performance was significantly worse than that estimated after 10 months (from the date of the first monitoring exercise).
V poročilu za leto 2004 je bilo celo navedeno, da so bili rezultati poslovanja v letu 2003 precej slabši od pričakovanih po 10 mesecih (od datuma prvega spremljanja).
See the third Polish report for January to June 2004, January 2004.
Glej 3. poljsko poročilo za obdobje od januarja do junija 2004, januar 2004.
See 2004 Independent Monitoring Report, May 2005.
Glej Neodvisno poročilo o spremljanju 2004, maj 2005.
See 2004 Independent Monitoring Report, May 2005, p. 1.
Glej Neodvisno poročilo o spremljanju 2004, maj 2005, str. 1.
See fifth Polish report, 9.9.2005, p. 18.
Glej 5. poljsko poročilo, 9.9.2005, str. 18.
The plan was never submitted to the Commission but was reproduced in the letter from the Polish authorities of 14.2.2006.
Načrt nikoli ni bil predložen Komisiji, temveč ponovno predstavljen v dopisu poljskih organov z dne 14.2.2006.
See seventh Polish report, 10.9.2006, p. 15.
Glej 7. poljsko poročilo, 10.9.2006, str. 15.
See Decision 2006/937/EC.
Glej Odločbo 2006/937/ES.
See OJ C 320, 17.10.1998, p. 3.
Glej UL C 320, 17.10.1998, str. 3.
See Annex B to the Multisectoral framework (OJ C 70, 19.3.2002, p. 8), which was replaced by Annex I to the Guidelines on national regional aid for 2007-2013 (OJ C 54, 4.3.2006, p. 13).
Glej Prilogo B k Večsektorskemu okviru (UL C 70, 19.3.2002, str. 8), ki je bila nadomeščena s Prilogo I k Smernicam o državni regionalni pomoči za 2007–2013 (UL C 54, 4.3.2006, str. 13).
Case C-256/97 DMT [1999] ECR I-3913, point 21.
Zadeva C-256/97 DMT [1999] PSES I-3913, točka 21.
Case T-36/99 Lenzing [2004] ECR II-3597, point 146.
Zadeva T-36/99 Lenzing [2004] PSES II-3597, točka 146.
See C-342/96 Tubacex [1999] ECR I-2459, point 46, C-256/97 DMT [1999] ECR I-3913, point 21, C-480/98 Magefesa [2000] ECR I-8717, T-152/99 HAMSA [2002] ECR II-3049 point 167.
Glej C-342/96 Tubacex [1999] PSES I-2459, točka 46, C-256/97 DMT [1999] PSES I-3913, točka 21, C-480/98 Magefesa [2000] PSES I-8717, T-152/99 HAMSA [2002] PSES II-3049 točka 167.
Case T-11/95 BP Chemicals [1998] ECR II-3235, points 170 and 179, in which the Court held that a capital injection cannot be regarded in isolation from an ongoing restructuring.
Zadeva T-11/95 BP Chemicals [1998] PSES II-3235, točki 170 in 179, v kateri je sodišče menilo, da dokapitalizacije ni mogoče obravnavati ločeno od tekočega prestrukturiranja.
In other words, it held that where restructuring aid has already been provided to a company in difficulty, other financial support should not normally pass the private investor test.
Z drugimi besedami, menilo je, da v primeru, ko je bila podjetju v težavah že zagotovljena pomoč za prestrukturiranje, druga finančna podpora običajno ne bi smela opraviti preizkusa zasebnega vlagatelja.
See Case T-126/96 and T-127/96 BFM and EFIM [1998] ECR II-3437, point 86.
Glej zadevi T-126/96 in T-127/96 BFM in EFIM [1998] PSES II–3437, točka 86.
Also Case T- 318/00 Freistaat Thüringen v. Commission (CDA Alrechts) [2005] ECR II-4179, points 200 and 248: ‘Given the disastrous situation of PA when the restructuring agreement was concluded, any reasonably diligent investor acting in a market economy would first have made an in-depth study of the undertaking's financial situation and required a viable restructuring plan to be drawn up before granting it such sizeable loans and a fortiori before acquiring it.’
Tudi zadevo T-318/00 Freistaat Thüringen proti Komisiji (CDA Alrechts) [2005] PSES II-4179, točki 200 in 248: „Glede na katastrofalen položaj PA ob sklenitvi sporazuma o prestrukturiranju bi vsak ustrezno prizadeven vlagatelj, ki deluje v tržnem gospodarstvu, najprej opravil poglobljeno študijo finančnega položaja podjetja in zahteval pripravo rentabilnega načrta prestrukturiranja, preden bi podjetju odobril takšna precejšnja posojila in še zlasti preden bi ga pridobil.“
Similarly: case T-36/99 Lenzing [2004] ECR II-3597 points 140 et seq.
Podobno: zadeva T-36/99 Lenzing [2004] PSES II-3597, točka 140 in naslednje.
Case T-152/99 HAMSA [2002] ECR II-3049 point 170.
Zadeva T-152/99 HAMSA [2002] PSES II-3049, točka 170.
Similarly, case T-36/99 Lenzing [2004] ECR II-3597, point 160, in which the CFI held that a public creditor with good securities has no reason to delay too long before applying collective enforcement measures.
Podobno: zadeva T-36/99 Lenzing [2004] PSES II-3597, točka 160, v kateri je Sodišče prve stopnje menilo, da javni upnik z dobrimi jamstvi nima razloga, da bi predolgo odlašal z uporabo kolektivnih izvršilnih ukrepov.
The same conclusions should be reached when considering that the non-enforcement of debt is a debt deferral, which has an effect equivalent to a loan, given that the recipient would normally need to borrow money on the capital market to prevent enforcement of the debt.
Do enakih sklepov bi morali priti, če upoštevamo, da je neizterjava dolga dejansko odlog dolga, ki ima enak učinek kot posojilo, saj bi si moral prejemnik običajno izposoditi denar na trgu kapitala, da bi preprečil izterjavo dolga.
However, because TB had lost its creditworthiness, such a loan would have had an aid element of 100 % (see the Communication on public undertakings in the manufacturing sector, OJ C 307, 13.11.1993, p. 3, point 41, applied in the Commission Decision of 7.7.2004 in case C-58/2003 Alstom, OJ L 150, 10.6.2005, p. 24, points 132 and 133).
Ker pa je TB izgubil svojo kreditno sposobnost, bi imelo takšno posojilo 100-odstotni element pomoči (glej Sporočilo o javnih podjetjih v proizvodnem sektorju, UL C 307, 13.11.1993, str. 3, točka 41, uporabljeno v Odločbi Komisije z dne 7.7.2004 v zadevi C-58/2003 Alstom, UL L 150, 10.6.2005, str. 24, točki 132 in 133).
It should also be noted that the assumption of a 100 % subsidy does not require a concrete transfer of state resources but is an assumption from an ex ante perspective.
Omeniti je treba tudi, da za domnevo 100-odstotne subvencije ni nujno potreben konkretni prenos državnih sredstev, temveč gre za domnevo z vidika ex ante.
It is thus irrelevant if a loan is later repaid contrary to the original assumption.
Tako ni pomembno, ali je posojilo v nasprotju s prvotno domnevo pozneje odplačano.
This is also true in the event of non-enforcement of debt, where the question of what a hypothetical private creditor is able to enforce should not be relevant.
To velja tudi v primeru neizterjave dolga, pri kateri vprašanje, kaj bi lahko izterjal hipotetični zasebni upnik, ne bi smelo biti pomembno.
See 2004 Independent Monitoring Report, April 2005, p. 13.
Glej Neodvisno poročilo o spremljanju 2004, april 2005, str. 13.
See 2004 Independent Monitoring Report, April 2005, p. 15.
Glej Neodvisno poročilo o spremljanju 2004, april 2005, str. 15.
This can be inferred from the Commission's practice under the 1999 rescue and restructuring guidelines which were applicable when Protocol No 8 came into effect (Community Guidelines on State Aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty, OJ C 288, 9.10.1999, p. 2).
To je mogoče povzeti iz prakse Komisije v skladu s smernicami za reševanje in prestrukturiranje iz leta 1999, ki so se uporabljale, ko je začel veljati Protokol št. 8 (Smernice Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah, UL C 288, 9.10.1999, str. 2).
This would not be allowed any longer under point 20 of the 2004 Community Guidelines on State Aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (OJ C 244, 1.10.2004, p. 2).
To ne bi bilo več dovoljeno v skladu s točko 20 Smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah iz leta 2004 (UL C 244, 1.10.2004, str. 2).
Although they do not apply directly as steel is in principle excluded, the Commission may in the exceptional case that restructuring aid is allowed at least draw inspiration from these guidelines.
Čeprav se ne uporabljajo neposredno, saj je jeklo načeloma izključeno, lahko Komisija v izjemnem primeru odobritve pomoči za prestrukturiranje vsaj črpa navdih iz teh smernic.
Official Journal L 338, 28.12.1996 p. 42.
UL L 338, 28.12.1996, str. 42.
According to point 44 of the Communication from the Commission concerning certain aspects of the treatment of competition cases resulting from the expiry of the ECSC Treaty (OJ C 152, 26.6.2002, p. 5) ‘when taking decisions after 23 July 2002 in respect of State Aid put into effect on or before that date without prior Commission approval, the Commission will proceed in accordance with the Commission notice on the determination of the applicable rules for the assessment of unlawful State Aid.’
V skladu s točko 44 Sporočila Komisije o določenih vidikih obravnavanja zadev konkurence, ki izhajajo iz prenehanja veljavnosti Pogodbe ESPJ (UL C 152, 26.6.2002, str. 5), „kadar se po 23. juliju 2002 sprejemajo odločitve o državni pomoči, ki je začela veljati na ta datum ali pred njim, brez predhodne odobritve Komisije, bo Komisija ravnala v skladu z obvestilom Komisije o določitvi veljavnih pravil za oceno nezakonite državne pomoči“.
This Communication (see OJ C 119, 22.5.2002, p. 22), stipulates that unlawful aid must be assessed in accordance with the text in force at the time when the aid was awarded.
S tem sporočilom (glej UL C 119, 22.5.2002, str. 22) je določeno, da je treba nezakonito pomoč oceniti v skladu z besedilom, veljavnim v času dodelitve pomoči.
OJ C 72, 10.3.1994, p. 3, applied in accordance with Article 3 of the Steel Aid Code (since replaced, OJ C 37 of 3.2.2001, p. 3).
UL C 72, 10.3.1994, str. 3, uporabljeno v skladu s členom 3 Kodeksa o jeklarski pomoči (odkar je nadomeščen – UL C 37, 3.2.2001, str. 3).
If more investments were made in 2005 and 2006 as indicated in recital (45) these should also be considered.
Če je bilo v letih 2005 in 2006 več naložb, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 45, je treba te ravno tako upoštevati.
It is established case-law that aid must, in principle, be recovered from the undertaking which has had the actual use thereof, in order to eliminate the distortion of competition caused by the competitive advantage afforded by that aid, see Joined Cases T-111/01 and T-133/01 Saxonia Edelmetalle [2005] II-1579, point 115.
Po uveljavljeni sodni praksi je treba pomoč načeloma dobiti povrnjeno od podjetja, ki je imelo dejansko korist od nje, da bi se izognili izkrivljanju konkurence, ki bi ga povzročila konkurenčna prednost, pridobljena s tako pomočjo, glej združeni zadevi T-111/01 in T-133/01 Saxonia Edelmetalle [2005] II-1579, točka 115.
This argument is also put forward by Advocate General Geelhoed in Joined Cases C-328/99 and C-399/00 Seleco [2003] ECR I-4035, points 79 and 84.
Tako utemeljitev je predložil tudi generalni pravobranilec Geelhoed v združenih zadevah C-328/99 in C-399/00 Seleco [2003] PSES I-4035, točki 79 in 84.