natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The fact that the newly installed deoiling capacities are significant shows that Indian and South American suppliers are highly committed to enter the European market.
Dejstvo, da so novo nameščene zmogljivosti za razoljevanje precejšnje, kaže, da so indijski in južnoameriški dobavitelji trdno odločeni vstopiti na evropski trg.
The newly available production capacity for non-GM deoiled lecithin in India and Brazil will exceed the volume of the entire EEA market.
Proizvodne zmogljivosti za GNS razoljeni lecitin, ki so od nedavnega na voljo v Indiji in Braziliji, bodo presegle obseg celotnega trga EGP.
The entry of a relatively large number of companies shows that the entry barriers to the deoiled lecithin market may be significant but are not insurmountable: while it is true that deoiled lecithin is no ‘commodity’ and its production involves technology and know-how, competitors have confirmed that this technology was available on the market (e.g. through engineering firms) and that they were able to produce non-GM deoiled lecithin of a comparable quality level to the market leaders.
Vstop relativno velikega števila družb kaže, da so ovire za vstop na trg razoljenega lecitina verjetno precejšnje, vendar ne nepremostljive. Čeprav je res, da razoljeni lecitin ni „surovina“ in da njegova proizvodnja vključuje tehnologijo, znanje in izkušnje, so tekmeci potrdili, da je ta tehnologija na trgu na voljo (npr. prek podjetij za inženiring) in da so lahko proizvedli GNS razoljeni lecitin na ravni kakovosti, ki je primerljiva z vodilnimi na trgu.
Also the fact that many food customers require a European presence of their supplier is not a significant obstacle for these competitors, since most of them cooperate with established European distributors who can provide the necessary know-how on customers and their individual need.
Tudi dejstvo, da mnogo kupcev z živilskega področja zahteva evropsko navzočnost svojega dobavitelja, za te tekmece ni znatna ovira, saj jih večina sodeluje z uveljavljenimi evropskimi distributerji, ki lahko zagotovijo potrebno znanje in izkušnje o kupcih in njihovih individualnih potrebah.
Many customers have, indeed, confirmed that they are interested in alternative sources of deoiled non-GM lecithin.
Mnogi kupci so dejansko potrdili, da se zanimajo za alternativne vire GNS razoljenega lecitina.
GM lecithin markets
Trgi GS lecitina
The market investigation has not confirmed the existence of competition problems in the markets for GM lecithin.
Preiskava trga ni potrdila obstoja problemov v zvezi s konkurenco na trgih za GS lecitin.
As concerns fluid lecithin, ADM will, even under the assumption of European markets, still be the clear market leader with a share of [40-50] %, followed by the parties, Solae, and a number of smaller competitors.
Glede tekočega lecitina bo ADM, celo pri domnevnih evropskih trgih, še vedno nedvomno vodilni na trgu z deležem [40–50] %, sledijo pa mu stranki, Solae in številni manjši tekmeci.
This suggests that the new entity would have little leeway to increase prices unilaterally or otherwise impede competition.
Iz tega je razbrati, da bi imel novi subjekt bolj malo manevrskega prostora za enostransko povišanje cen ali kakršno koli drugačno oviranje konkurence.
Furthermore Cargill does not focus its lecithin marketing strategy on GM markets.
Poleg tega Cargillova strategija trženja lecitina ni usmerjena v trge GS lecitina.
As for the risk that the merger will elicit coordinated behaviour, the Commission considers that such a risk is negligible, mainly for the same reasons as for non-GM fluid lecithin (no price transparency, asymmetry of market shares etc.).
Glede tveganja, da bo združitev imela za posledico usklajeno ravnanje, Komisija meni, da je takšno tveganje zanemarljivo, večinoma zaradi enakih razlogov kot pri GNS tekočem lecitinu (ni preglednosti cen, nesomernost tržnih deležev itd.).
As concerns GM deoiled lecithin, Solae would hold [50-60] % of a European market, followed by DFI, but with a limited increment through the addition of Cargill.
Glede GS razoljenega lecitina bi imela družba Solae [50–60] % evropskega trga, sledil pa bi ji DFI, vendar z omejenim povečanjem zaradi Cargillovega dodatka.
There are a number of other competitors on the market (e.g. ADM).
Na trgu so številni drugi tekmeci (npr. ADM).
Consequently, the overlap in the markets for GM deoiled lecithin is very limited.
Posledično je prekrivanje na trgih za GS razoljeni lecitin zelo omejeno.
The parties’ combined market share for pectin does not exceed 25 %, neither on a worldwide nor on an EEA-wide basis, with only a very limited increment.
Skupni tržni delež strank za pektin niti v svetovnem obsegu niti v obsegu EGP ne presega 25 %, z zelo omejenim povečanjem.
The position of the market leader, CP Kelco and the current number 2 (Danisco) will not be affected by the merger.
Združitev ne bo vplivala na položaj vodilnega (CP Kelco) in trenutno drugega (Danisco) na trgu.
This assessment would not change when alternative markets (e.g. worldwide markets, markets for apple/citrus or markets according to the methoxyl content) were to be distinguished, because Cargill’s position on these markets would be even weaker.
Presoja se ne bi spremenila, četudi bi ločevali med alternativnimi trgi (npr. svetovni trgi, trgi za pektin iz jabolk/agrumov ali trgi glede na vsebnost metoksila), saj bi bil Cargillov položaj na teh trgih še šibkejši.
Vertical effects (crude seed oil)
Vertikalni učinki (surovo semensko olje)
Although, on the basis of a hypothetical definition of an upstream market for crude soy oil in the EEA, the proposed transaction technically gives rise to a vertically affected market, it does not raise any vertical concerns, mainly because DFI and Cargill buy ready-made fluid non-GM lecithin from third parties and do not use non-GM raw material from their own production to produce non-GM lecithin.
Čeprav na podlagi hipotetične opredelitve trga v zgornjem delu verige vrednosti za surovo semensko olje v EGP predlagana transakcija vodi do vertikalno prizadetega trga, ne povzroča nobenih vertikalnih pomislekov, predvsem zato, ker DFI in Cargill kupujeta pripravljen GNS tekoči lecitin od tretjih strank in za proizvodnjo GNS lecitina ne uporabljata GNS surovin iz lastne proizvodnje.
The decision, therefore, concludes that, the proposed concentration will not significantly impede effective competition in the Common Market or in a substantial part of it.
Odločba zato ugotavlja, da predlagana koncentracija ne bo občutno ovirala učinkovite konkurence na skupnem trgu oziroma na njegovem znatnem delu.
Consequently, the decision declares the concentration compatible with the Common Market and the EEA Agreement, in accordance with Articles 2(2) and Article 8(1) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement.
Zato odločba razglaša, da je koncentracija združljiva s skupnim trgom in Sporazumom EGP, v skladu s členom 2(2) in členom 8(1) Uredbe o združitvah ter členom 57 Sporazuma EGP.
Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and the Council on 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed (OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 1) and Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amended by Directive 2001/18/EC (OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 24).
Uredba (ES) št. 1829/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o gensko spremenjenih živilih in krmi (UL L 268, 18.10.2003, str. 1) , Uredba (ES) št. 1830/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o sledljivosti in označevanju gensko spremenjenih organizmov ter sledljivosti živil in krme, proizvedenih iz gensko spremenjenih organizmov, ter o spremembi Direktive 2001/18/ES (UL L 268, 18.10.2003, str. 24).
There are also some forms of modified/customised ‘special lecithins’, which, however, account only for a negligible part of the market.
Obstajajo tudi nekatere oblike spremenjenih/prilagojenih „posebnih lecitinov“, ki pa predstavljajo le zanemarljiv del trga.
declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement
o razglasitvi združljivosti koncentracije s skupnim trgom in delovanjem Sporazuma EGP
(Case COMP/M.4504 — SFR/Télé 2 France)
(Zadeva št. COMP/M.4504 – SFR/Télé 2 France)
(notified under document number C(2007) 3443)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 3443)
On 18 July 2007 the Commission adopted a Decision in a merger case under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings [1], and in particular Article 8(2) of that Regulation.
Komisija je 18. julija 2007 na podlagi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 139/2004 z dne 20. januarja 2004 o nadzoru koncentracij podjetij [1] in zlasti člena 8(2) navedene uredbe sprejela odločbo glede združitve.
A non-confidential version of the full Decision can be found in the authentic language of the case and in the working languages of the Commission on the website of the Directorate-General for Competition, at the following address: http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/index_en.htmlSUMMARY
Različica celotne odločbe, ki ni zaupna, je na voljo v verodostojnem jeziku zadeve in v delovnih jezikih Komisije na spletni strani Generalnega direktorata za konkurenco na naslednjem naslovu: http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/index_en.htmlPOVZETEK
On 28 November 2006 the Commission received a notification, pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (the Merger Regulation), of a proposed concentration by which SFR S.A. (SFR, France), an undertaking jointly controlled by Vivendi S.A. (Vivendi, France) and Vodafone Group plc (Vodafone, UK), acquires, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, sole control of the Internet access and fixed telephony business of the undertaking Télé 2 France (Télé 2, France, a subsidiary of the Télé 2 group) by way of a purchase of shares.
Komisija je 28. novembra 2006 prejela priglasitev predlagane koncentracije v skladu s členom 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 139/2004 („Uredba ES o združitvah“), s katero podjetje SFR S.A. („SFR“, Francija), ki je pod skupnim nadzorom Vivendi SA („Vivendi“, Francija) in Vodafone Group plc („Vodafone“, Združeno kraljestvo), z nakupom delnic pridobi izključni nadzor nad poslovno dejavnostjo internetnega dostopa in fiksne telefonije podjetja Télé 2 France („Télé 2“, Francija, podružnica skupine Télé 2) v smislu člena 3(1)(b) Uredbe.
The transaction does not concern Télé 2’s business in mobile telephony services.
Ta transakcija ne zadeva storitev mobilne telefonije podjetja Télé 2.
SFR is a French company operating in the mobile telephony sector in France.
SFR je francoska družba, ki deluje v sektorju mobilne telefonije v Franciji.
It is controlled by Vivendi and Vodafone.
Nadzorujeta jo družbi Vivendi in Vodafone.
Vivendi is the parent company of a French group engaged in the media and telecommunications sectors.
Vivendi je matična družba francoske skupine, ki deluje v sektorju medijev in telekomunikacij.
The Vivendi group is chiefly engaged in the pay-TV (via the Canal+ group), cinema, music, interactive games and telecommunications sectors.
Skupina Vivendi je prisotna predvsem v sektorju plačljive televizije (prek skupine Canal+), kinematografije, glasbe, interaktivnih iger in telekomunikacij.
Vodafone is the parent company of a British group which is active as an operator of mobile telephony networks and provider of other telecommunications services in various EU Member States and non-EU countries.
Vodafone je matična družba britanske skupine, ki deluje kot operater mobilnega telefonskega omrežja ter izvajalec drugih telekomunikacijskih storitev v različnih državah članicah Evropske unije in zunaj nje.
Télé 2 France (Télé 2) is the French subsidiary of the Télé 2 group.
Télé 2 France (Télé 2) je francoska podružnica skupine Télé 2.
It is engaged in the sectors of fixed telephony, Internet access provision, and also pay-TV since DSL [2] television services were launched in June 2006.
Deluje v sektorju fiksne telefonije, zagotavljanja internetnega dostopa in od uvedbe ponudbe televizijske storitve DSL [2] junija 2006 tudi v sektorju plačljive televizije.
Télé 2 is also engaged in the mobile telephony sector.
Podjetje Télé 2 je prav tako dejavno v sektorju mobilne telefonije.
The market survey showed that the transaction as notified is liable to weaken significantly the competitive pressure exercised by DSL operators on all the pay-TV markets in France and thus, in the longer term, to raise the prices and lower the quality of supply.
Tržna raziskava je pokazala, da bi bila lahko posledica priglašene transakcije občutna oslabitev konkurenčnega pritiska, ki ga izvajajo operaterji DSL na vse trge plačljive televizije v Franciji ter tako sčasoma porast cen in padec kakovosti ponudbe.
There are therefore serious concerns that the transaction as notified might significantly impede effective competition in the common market or in a substantial part of it.
Zato obstajajo resni dvomi, da bi priglašena transakcija lahko močno ovirala učinkovito konkurenco na skupnem trgu ali njegovem znatnem delu.
SFR and Vivendi have, however, proposed appropriate remedies which overcome these concerns.
Podjetji SFR in Vivendi sta vseeno predlagali ustrezne rešitve, s katerimi bi lahko ovrgli te dvome.
I. MARKET DEFINITIONS
I. OPREDELITEV TRGOV
The transaction at hand concerns the pay-TV sector in France.
Zadevna transakcija zadeva sektor plačljive televizije v Franciji.
This sector is organised essentially as follows.
Če poenostavimo, je ta sektor organiziran na naslednji način.
Upstream are the holders of rights to broadcast programmes (films, series, sports events, etc.).
Na zgornjem delu tržne verige so imetniki pravic do razširjanja programov (filmi, nadaljevanke, športne prireditve itd.).
At the intermediate level, channel producers produce their own programmes internally and/or acquire the broadcasting rights for the programmes (films, series, sports events, etc.) that are to constitute the channel content.
Na vmesni ravni izdajatelji programov interno izdelajo svoje programe in/ali pridobijo pravice do razširjanja programov (filmi, nadaljevanke, športne prireditve itd.), da oblikujejo vsebino svojih kanalov.
Downstream, distributors purchase from producers the right to broadcast their channels and offer subscription-based pay-TV channel packages.
Na spodnjem delu tržne verige distributerji od izdajateljev odkupijo pravice do razširjanja njihovih kanalov in oblikujejo ponudbe plačljive televizije v obliki paketov kanalov, dostopnih proti plačilu naročnine.
Pay-TV offerings can be delivered to final consumers by various means, the main ones in France being cable, satellite, DSL and terrestrial (analogue and digital).
Distribucija ponudb plačljive televizije končnim uporabnikom se lahko zagotovi z različnimi načini prenosa, pri čemer so v Franciji glavni načini kabelski, satelitski, DSL in (analogni in digitalni) prizemni.
Product markets
Proizvodni trgi
‘Upstream’ markets for the acquisition of broadcasting rights
Zgornji deli tržne verige pridobitve pravic do razširjanja avdiovizualnih programov
The main criteria for the breakdown and differentiation of broadcasting rights are:
Glavna merila za delitev in razločevanje pravic do razširjanja avdiovizualnih programov so:
the nature of the programme: films and recent series; sports events; other broadcasting content (stock and flow programmes);
vrsta programa: kinematografska dela in najnovejše nadaljevanke; športne prireditve; druge avdiovizualne vsebine (programi na zalogi in tekoči programi);
the distribution platform: cable, satellite, DSL and terrestrial (analogue and digital); and
distribucijska platforma: kabelska, satelitska, DSL ter analogna prizemna in digitalna prizemna;
the form of delivery: conventional (linear) TV channels and ‘non-linear’ TV services (pay per view (PPV) and video on demand (VoD)).
vrsta razširjanja: klasični linearni televizijski kanali in nelinearne televizijske storitve (plačaj, kolikor gledaš (Pay Per View – „PPV“) in video na zahtevo (Video on Demand – „VoD“)).
On upstream markets, DSL television operators in France are engaged mainly in the purchase of VoD broadcasting rights.
Na zgornjih delih tržne verige so operaterji DSL-televizije v Franciji predvsem dejavni na področju nakupa pravic do razširjanja v obliki videa na zahtevo.
Although it did not produce a VoD service prior to the transaction, Télé 2 was nevertheless a potential entrant to the market for purchase of VoD broadcasting rights.
Čeprav podjetje Télé 2 pred transakcijo ni izdajalo storitve videa na zahtevo, je bilo kljub temu novi potencialni tekmec na trgu odkupa pravic do razširjanja v obliki videa na zahtevo.
For purposes of the competition assessment of the transaction at hand and on the basis of the findings of the market survey, a separate market must be defined for the acquisition of VoD broadcasting rights to films.
Zaradi potreb po konkurenčni presoji zadevne transakcije in na podlagi rezultatov tržne raziskave je treba opredeliti samostojni trg za pridobitev pravic do kinematografskih del, namenjenih razširjanju v obliki videa na zahtevo.
‘Intermediate’ markets for the distribution of channels
„Vmesni“ trgi trženja kanalov
These intermediate markets bring together TV channel producers and distributors of pay-TV services.
Ti vmesni trgi povezujejo izdajatelje televizijskih programov in distributerje storitev plačljive televizije.
Commission decisions have consistently drawn a distinction between free channels, which are chiefly financed by advertising revenues (public channels may also be financed by public funds), and pay-TV channels, which are mainly financed by the fees paid by distributors.
V skladu s stalno prakso odločanja Komisije obstaja razlika med brezplačnimi kanali, ki se večinoma financirajo z oglaševalskimi sredstvi (ki jih v primeru javnih kanalov po potrebi dopolnjujejo javna sredstva), in plačljivimi kanali, ki se zlasti financirajo s sredstvi, pridobljenimi s pristojbinami, ki jih plačajo distributerji.
The Commission has on several occasions considered a breakdown based on the themes of the channels (in particular premium and sports channels), but has not yet reached a definite decision on this issue.
Komisija je večkrat predvidela delitev glede na tematiko različnih kanalov (zlasti premium in športni kanali), pri čemer dejansko ni razrešila tega vprašanja.
Although it is not necessary to reach a definitive conclusion on this question, the Commission’s analysis is that an attractive package is a ‘basic’ package made up of several main themes (premium, film, youth, sport and news) plus a number of other themes that are more or less substitutable for one another.
Ne da bi bilo treba razrešiti to vprašanje, je bilo v analizi Komisije ugotovljeno, da je zanimiv paket kanalov „osnovni“ paket, ki ga sestavljajo različne glavne tematike (premium, filmi, mladinske oddaje, šport, informativni program), tega pa dopolnjuje več drugih tematik, ki so med seboj bolj ali manj zamenljive.
In principle the competition authorities do not apply a breakdown by technical means of delivery, i.e. do not distinguish between different broadcasting platforms such as cable, satellite or, more recently, DSL, since in principle producers want their channels to be distributed as widely as possible in order to maximise revenues and, at the very least, to have a presence on all the broadcasting platforms through exclusive rights for more than one platform.
Ne nazadnje, organi za konkurenco načeloma ne opravljajo delitve glede na tehnični postopek distribucije (to pomeni z razlikovanjem različnih platform razširjanja, kot so kabelska, satelitska ali pred kratkim DSL), saj želijo izdajatelji načeloma čim bolje tržiti svoje kanale, da bi dobili čim večje plačilo in vsaj bili prisotni na vseh platformah razširjanja prek izključnih multiplatformnih pravic.
The downstream market for retail distribution of pay-TV services
Spodnji del tržne verige maloprodajne distribucije storitev plačljive televizije
The Commission’s consistent practice has been to consider distribution of pay TV and free TV as two separate product markets.
V skladu s stalno prakso Komisije sta distribucija plačljive in brezplačne televizije dva samostojna proizvodna trga.
Pay TV and free TV service offerings are not very substitutable from the standpoint of demand.
Ponudbe plačljive in brezplačne televizije je namreč z vidika povpraševanja težko nadomestiti z drugimi.
The investigation of the case at hand does not challenge this basic distinction.
Preiskava zadevne transakcije ni sprožila vprašanja o tej osnovni delitvi.
The market survey carried out in connection with the transaction tends to confirm that it is not necessary to segment the market according to the different means of broadcasting pay TV (cable, satellite, DSL, terrestrial), particularly in view of the growing convergence of different platforms in terms of content.
Vendar naj bi tržna raziskava, izvedena v okviru transakcije, potrdila, da ni treba opravljati delitve trga glede na različne načine razširjanja plačljive televizije (kabelski, satelitski, DSL, prizemni), zlasti če upoštevamo vedno večje zbliževanje različnih platform na ravni vsebine.
Nor, for the purposes of the case at hand, is it necessary to give an opinion on whether the emerging TV services via mobile telephony platforms form a separate market, since, on the one hand, SFR is a mobile telephony operator prior to the transaction and, on the other, Télé 2’s mobile telephony business is not involved in the transaction.
Poleg tega se zaradi potreb te zadeve ni treba izreči o vprašanju, ali storitve, ki izhajajo iz televizijske distribucije prek platform mobilne telefonije, pomenijo samostojni trg, pod pogojem, da je, na eni strani, podjetje SFR že pred izvedbo transakcije operater mobilne telefonije in da, na drugi strani, transakcija ne zadeva dejavnosti mobilne telefonije podjetja Télé 2.
Geographic markets
Geografski trgi
In line with the position consistently taken in its decisions, the Commission has applied a national dimension to all the markets defined above.
V zvezi z vsemi zgoraj opredeljenimi trgi Komisija v skladu s svojo ustaljeno prakso odločanja upošteva nacionalno razsežnost.
As regards the acquisition of content (rights or channels), the negotiations between providers and customers are organised on a national basis regardless of whether the rights are over national or foreign content.
V zvezi z nakupom vsebin (pravic ali kanalov) so pogajanja med ponudniki in povpraševalci organizirana na nacionalni podlagi (če gre za pravice do nacionalnih ali tujih vsebin).
With regard to the downstream pay-TV market, the different means of delivery either cover the whole of the national territory (satellite) or are gradually covering all or a large part of it (DTT, DSL and cable).
Kar zadeva spodnji del tržne verige distribucije storitev plačljive televizije, je treba opozoriti, da različni načini razširjanja zajemajo vse nacionalno ozemlje (satelit) oziroma da naj bi postopoma zajemali celotno ozemlje ali njegov velik del (digitalna prizemna, DSL ali kabelska televizija).
It should also be noted that pay-TV distributors have a uniform tariff policy for the whole of the country.
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da imajo distributerji plačljive televizije enotno cenovno politiko na vsem ozemlju.
Operation of the market before the notified transaction
Delovanje trga pred priglašeno transakcijo
At present, before the transaction, the Vivendi group distributes pay TV in France direct by satellite and by terrestrial transmission.
Pred transakcijo je bila skupina Vivendi neposredno dejavna na področju distribucije plačljive televizije v Franciji prek satelita in prizemnega prenosa.
Vivendi’s channel packages are also available by DSL.
Podjetje Vivendi ponuja pakete kanalov tudi prek tehnologije DSL.
But without the transaction Vivendi has no DSL infrastructure of its own, and to distribute these channels it has to make use of DSL operators’ networks.
Ker pa podjetje Vivendi pred transakcijo ni imelo infrastrukture DSL, mora za distribucijo teh paketov uporabiti omrežje operaterjev DSL.