natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(AustroMechana), BMG Music Publishing International Ltd, Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte (GEMA), Mechanical-Copyright Protection Society Limited (MCPS), Mechanical-Copyright Protection Society Ireland (MCPSI), Nordic Copyright Bureau (NCB), Société Belge des Auteurs Compositeurs et Editeurs (SABAM), Société pour l’Administration du Droit de Reproduction Mécanique des Auteurs, Compositeurs et Editeurs (SDRM), Sociedad General Autores y Editores (SGAE), Società Italiana degli Autori ed Editori (SIAE), Sony/ATV Music Publishing Europe, Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores (SPA), Stichting Stemra (STEMRA), Schweizerische Gesellschaft für die Rechte der Urheber musikalischer Werke (SUISA), Universal Music Publishing Group and Warner Chappell Music Ltd, hereafter referred to as ‘the parties to the Cannes Extension Agreement’.
(AustroMechana), BMG Music Publishing International Ltd, Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte (GEMA), Mechanical-Copyright Protection Society Limited (MCPS), Mechanical-Copyright Protection Society Ireland (MCPSI), Nordic Copyright Bureau (NCB), Société Belge des Auteurs Compositeurs et Editeurs (SABAM), Société pour l’Administration du Droit de Reproduction Mécanique des Auteurs, Compositeurs et Editeurs (SDRM), Sociedad General Autores y Editores (SGAE), Società Italiana degli Autori ed Editori (SIAE), Sony/ATV Music Publishing Europe, Sociedade Portuguesa de Autores (SPA), Stichting Stemra (STEMRA), Schweizerische Gesellschaft für die Rechte der Urheber musikalischer Werke (SUISA), Universal Music Publishing Group in Warner Chappell Music Ltd, v nadaljnjem besedilu „stranke Sporazuma o podaljšanju iz Cannesa“.
The subject matter of the procedure was the Cannes Extension Agreement, an agreement among the 18 companies (13 of which are copyright collecting societies managing mechanical copyright in music and five major music publishers, members of these collecting societies) concerning the relations between them in the management of mechanical copyright of music licensed to record companies for the reproduction of sound recordings on physical carriers.
Predmet postopka je bil Sporazum o podaljšanju iz Cannesa, sporazum med osemnajstimi družbami (od katerih je trinajst evropskih kolektivnih organizacij za upravljanje mehaničnih glasbenih avtorskih pravic ter pet velikih glasbenih založnikov, ki so člani teh kolektivnih organizacij) o odnosih med njimi pri upravljanju mehaničnih glasbenih avtorskih pravic, licenčno podeljenih glasbenim založbam za reprodukcijo zvočnih zapisov na fizične nosilce.
In its preliminary assessment, the Commission expressed concerns under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and 53 of the EEA Agreement about two clauses of the Cannes Extension Agreement.
V svoji predhodni oceni je Komisija v skladu s členom 81 Pogodbe ES in členom 53 Sporazuma EGP izrazila pomisleka glede dveh določb Sporazuma o podaljšanju iz Cannesa.
The first was a clause that provided that before granting a rebate to a record company in the context of a Central Licensing Agreement, a collecting society needed the written consent of ‘the relevant member’.
Prva je bila določba, da mora kolektivna organizacija pred odobritvijo rabata glasbeni založbi v okviru Sporazuma o centraliziranem dodeljevanju licenc pridobiti pisno soglasje „ustreznega člana“.
The second was a clause that provided that collecting societies may never enter either the music publishing or the record production markets.
Druga je bila določba, da kolektivne organizacije ne smejo nikoli delovati na trgih glasbenega založništva ali proizvodnje glasbenih nosilcev.
The Commission’s competition concerns were that the first clause could have the effect of making it very difficult or even impossible for collecting societies to grant rebates to record companies and that the second clause could prevent potential competition by collecting societies in the music publishing and record production markets.
Pomisleka Komisije v zvezi s konkurenco sta bila, da bi prva določba lahko zelo oteževala ali onemogočala kolektivnim organizacijam, da glasbenim založbam odobrijo rabate, druga določba pa bi lahko preprečevala morebitno konkurenco med kolektivnimi organizacijami na trgih glasbenega založništva in proizvodnje glasbenih nosilcev.
The Commission considers that the commitments offered by the parties to the Cannes Extension Agreement are sufficient to address the identified competition concerns.
Komisija meni, da so zaveze, ki jih dale stranke Sporazuma o podaljšanju iz Cannesa, zadostne za obravnavo pomislekov Komisije v zvezi s konkurenco.
In particular the parties have reformulated the clause referring to rebates to the effect that a collecting society may decide to offer a rebate paid out of the administrative expenses that it retains from royalties due to its members by a simple decision of its competent body with no need to obtain the written consent of the ‘relevant member’.
Zlasti so stranke spremenile določbo, ki se nanaša na rabate, na način, da se kolektivna organizacija lahko odloči in ponudi rabat, ki se plača iz upravnih stroškov, zadržanih od licenčnin, ki jih izplačuje svojim članom, s preprostim sklepom njenega pristojnega organa, ne da bi morala pridobiti pisno soglasje „ustreznega člana“.
The parties have deleted the clause preventing collecting societies from entering the music publishing and the record production markets and have undertaken not to enter into a similar agreement in the future.
Stranke so črtale določbo, ki je kolektivnim organizacijam prepovedovala vstopati na trg glasbenega založništva in proizvodnje glasbenih nosilcev, in so se obvezale, da v prihodnosti ne bodo sklepale podobnih sporazumov.
The decision finds, in view of the commitments made binding on the parties to the Cannes Extension Agreement, that there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission.
Komisija v odločbi ugotavlja, da glede na zaveze, ki so jih dale stranke Sporazuma o podaljšanju iz Cannesa, vzrokov za ukrepanje Komisije ni več.
The Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions issued a favourable opinion on 18 September 2006.
Svetovalni odbor za omejevalna ravnanja in prevladujoče položaje je dne 18. septembra 2006 podal pozitivno mnenje.
amending Annex II to Council Decision 79/542/EEC as regards the list of third countries and parts thereof from which imports into the Community of certain fresh meat is authorised
o spremembi Priloge II k Odločbi Sveta 79/542/EGS o seznamu tretjih držav ali delov teh držav, iz katerih je odobren uvoz nekaterih vrst svežega mesa v Skupnost
(notified under document number C(2007) 5365)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 5365)
Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries [2], and in particular Article 22(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 97/78/ES z dne 18. decembra 1997 o določitvi načel o organizaciji veterinarskih pregledov proizvodov, ki vstopajo v Skupnost iz tretjih držav [2], in zlasti člena 22(6) Direktive,
Having regard to Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption [3], and in particular the introductory phrase of Article 8, the first subparagraph of Article 8(1) and Article 8(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2002/99/ES z dne 16. decembra 2002 o predpisih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki urejajo proizvodnjo, predelavo, distribucijo in uvoz proizvodov živalskega izvora, namenjenih prehrani ljudi [3], in zlasti uvodnega stavka člena 8, prvega pododstavka točke 1 člena 8 in točke 4 člena 8 Direktive,
Part 1 of Annex II to Council Decision 79/542/EEC of 21 December 1976 drawing up a list of third countries or parts of third countries, and laying down animal and public health and veterinary certification conditions, for importation into the Community of certain live animals and their fresh meat [4] sets out a list of third countries and parts thereof from which Member States are authorised to import fresh meat of certain animals.
Del 1 Priloge II k Odločbi Sveta 79/542/EGS z dne 21. decembra 1979 o seznamu tretjih držav ali delov teh držav in o pogojih za zdravstveno varstvo živali, javno zdravstveno varstvo in izdajanje veterinarskih spričeval za uvoz nekaterih živih živali in njihovega svežega mesa v Skupnost [4] določa seznam tretjih držav ali delov teh držav, iz katerih države članice lahko uvažajo sveže meso nekaterih živali.
That Annex indicates the time periods for which importation into the Community is authorised or not authorised, in relation to dates of slaughter or killing of the animals from which the meat was obtained.
Ta priloga določa časovna obdobja, za katera je uvoz v Skupnost dovoljen ali prepovedan glede na datume zakola/ubitja živali, iz katerih je bilo meso pridobljeno.
Those periods are indicated in order to allow the importation of fresh meat produced before the animal health restrictions were applied to certain third countries or parts thereof.
Ta obdobja so določena, da se dovoli uvoz svežega mesa, ki je bilo pridelano, preden so začele veljati omejitve za nekatere tretje države ali dele teh držav glede zdravstvenega varstva živali.
However, to guarantee a high level of health protection in the Community, it is appropriate to provide that imports of fresh meat obtained in a third country from animals slaughtered on or before the date of application of restrictive measures are only allowed for a limited period of time, namely 90 days.
Kljub temu je za zagotovitev visoke ravni varovanja zdravja v Skupnosti primerno določiti, da je uvoz svežega mesa živali, zaklanih v tretjih držav na ali pred datumom začetka veljavnosti omejevalnih ukrepov, dovoljen le omejeno časovno obdobje 90 dni.
In case of consignments certified on or before the date of application of an import ban and transported on high seas at the moment in which the ban enters into force, that period should be 40 days.
Če se spričevalo za pošiljko izda na ali pred datumom začetka veljavnosti prepovedi uvoza in če se pošiljka prevaža na odprtem morju v trenutku začetka veljavnosti prepovedi, naj bi bilo to obdobje 40 dni.
The date from which imports into the Community of fresh meat from a certain third country or parts thereof are authorised, or banned, should be inserted in Annex II to Decision 79/542/EEC in order to avoid imports of fresh meat produced in a period in which an animal health risk was present in such country or part thereof.
Datum, ko se uvoz svežega mesa iz določene tretje države ali delov te države odobri ali prepove, je treba vstaviti v Prilogo II k Odločbi 79/542/EGS, da bi se izognili uvozu svežega mesa, pridelanega v obdobju, ko je v tej državi ali delu te države bilo prisotno tveganje za zdravje živali.
The existing indications of time periods in that Annex have also created practical problems, both as regards the Community border inspection posts when checking the health certificates for imports of such meat and for the competent services in the exporting third countries when preparing those certificates.
Obstoječe navedbe časovnih obdobij v navedeni prilogi so povzročile praktične težave mejnim kontrolnim točkam Skupnosti, ko preverjajo veterinarska spričevala za uvoz takšnega mesa, in tudi pristojnim organom v tretjih državah izvoznicah, ko pripravljajo ta spričevala.
As a consequence, in order to achieve a high level of protection of health and in order to ensure clarity, coherence and transparency as regards the list of third countries from which imports of fresh meat into the Community are authorised, it is appropriate to amend Annex II to Decision 79/542/EEC and to delete the references to those periods.
Zaradi tega je, da bi se doseglo visoko raven varovanja zdravja in zagotovilo jasnost, skladnost in preglednost glede seznama tretjih držav, iz katerih je dovoljen uvoz svežega mesa v Skupnost, primerno spremeniti Prilogo II k Odločbi 79/542/EGS in črtati sklicevanja na navedena obdobja.
In addition, entries concerning certain countries, in particular Paraguay and Brazil, should be updated.
Poleg tega je treba posodobiti podatke, ki zadevajo nekatere države, zlasti Paragvaj in Brazilijo.
In order to allow the imports of stocks of fresh meat currently authorised to be imported into the Community from certain third countries or parts thereof under Decision 79/542/EEC, but which no longer will be authorised after the date of application of the present Decision, it is appropriate to provide for a transitional period of 90 days.
Da se dovoli uvoz zalog svežega mesa, ki jim je odobren uvoz v Skupnost iz nekaterih tretjih držav ali delov teh držav na podlagi Odločbe 79/542/EGS, vendar ne bo več odobren po datumu začetka veljavnosti te odločbe, je primerno zagotoviti prehodno obdobje 90 dni.
Due to two outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease in Argentina in February 2006, Commission Decision 2006/259/EC of 27 March 2006 amending Annex II to Council Decision 79/542/EEC as regards regionalisation for Argentina and the model certificates relating to the importation of bovine fresh meat from Argentina [5] prohibited imports of de-boned and matured bovine meat from eight departments in the province of Corrientes.
Zaradi dveh izbruhov slinavke in parkljevke v Argentini februarja 2006 je Odločba Komisije 2006/259/ES z dne 27. marca 2006 o spremembi Priloge II k Odločbi Sveta 79/542/EGS v zvezi z regionalizacijo za Argentino in obrazci spričeval za uvoz svežega govejega mesa iz Argentine [5] prepovedala uvoz izkoščenega in zorjenega govejega mesa iz osmih departmajev province Corrientes.
A recent Community inspection in Argentina showed that the current animal health restrictions in the eight departments concerned, in particular as regards foot and mouth disease, are no longer necessary.
Na nedavnem inšpekcijskem pregledu v Argentini je bilo ugotovljeno, da veljavne omejitve glede zdravstvenega varstva živali v osmih zadevnih departmajih, zlasti glede slinavke in parkljevke, niso več potrebne.
Those restrictions should therefore no longer apply to those areas of Argentina, as requested by that country.
Zato naj za navedena območja te omejitve ne bi več veljale, kakor je zahtevala Argentina.
The inspection also showed that the production of de-boned and matured deer meat in Argentina fulfils the animal health requirements provided for in Decision 79/542/EEC.
Na inšpekcijskem pregledu je bilo prav tako ugotovljeno, da proizvodnja izkoščenega in zorjenega jelenovega mesa iz Argentine izpolnjuje zahteve za zdravstveno varstvo živali iz Odločbe 79/542/EGS.
It is therefore appropriate to authorise imports into the Community of de-boned and matured deer meat from Argentina.
Zato je primerno odobriti uvoz izkoščenega in zorjenega jelenovega mesa iz Argentine v Skupnost.
Due to two outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease in Botswana in April 2006, Council Decision 79/542/EEC, as amended by Commission Decision 2006/463/EC [6], prohibited imports of de-boned and matured bovine meat from a part of Botswana.
Zaradi dveh izbruhov slinavke in parkljevke v Bocvani aprila 2006 je Odločba Sveta 79/542/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo Komisije 2006/463/ES [6], prepovedala uvoz izkoščenega in zorjenega govejega mesa iz dela Bocvane.
The documentation received from Botswana and the favourable outcome of a Community inspection carried out in that country in March 2007 show that the measures taken by Botswana have been effective in controlling and eliminating the disease.
Prejeta dokumentacija iz Bocvane in ugoden izid inšpekcijskega pregleda Skupnosti, opravljenega marca 2007 v tej državi, kažeta na to, da so bili ukrepi, ki jih je sprejela Bocvana, učinkoviti pri nadzoru in odpravi bolezni.
Accordingly, the current animal health restrictions in the concerned part of Botswana should no longer apply.
Zato sedanje omejitve glede zdravstvenega varstva živali v zadevnem delu Bocvane naj ne bi več veljale.
In addition, the Community inspection considered favourably two other regions of Botswana that have been recognised by the OIE as free of FMD without vaccination.
Inšpekcijski pregled Skupnosti je poleg tega ugodno ocenil dve drugi regiji Bocvane, ki ju je Svetovna organizacija za zdravje živali (OIE) ocenila kot regiji brez slinavke in parkljevke, kjer cepljenje ni bilo opravljeno.
It is therefore opportune to allow these areas to export to the EU de-boned and matured bovine, ovine and farmed and wild game meat.
Zato je primerno tem območjem dovoliti izvoz izkoščenega in zorjenega govejega in ovčjega mesa ter mesa gojene in prostoživeče divjadi v EU.
Parts of Colombia are listed in Part 1 of Annex II to Decision 79/542/EEC as parts of a third country from which imports of fresh bovine meat into the Community are authorised.
V delu 1 Priloge II k Odločbi 79/542/EGS so navedeni deli Kolumbije kot deli tretje države, iz katere je odobren uvoz svežega govejega mesa v Skupnost.
However, Colombia has not submitted any residue monitoring plan for fresh bovine meat in accordance with Commission Decision 2004/432/EC of 29 April 2004 on the approval of residue monitoring plans submitted by third countries in accordance with Council Directive 96/23/EC [7].
Toda Kolumbija ni predložila nobenega programa nadzora nad ostanki škodljivih snovi za sveže goveje meso v skladu z Odločbo Komisije 2004/432/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o odobritvi programov nadzora nad ostanki škodljivih snovi, predloženih s strani tretjih držav v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 96/23/ES [7].
In addition, no establishments are authorised for export of fresh meat to the Community.
Tudi noben organ ni pooblaščen za izvoz svežega mesa v Skupnost.
Therefore imports of fresh bovine meat from Colombia should no longer be authorised and the necessary amendment made to Part 1 of Annex II to Decision 79/542/EEC.
Zato uvoz svežega govejega mesa iz Kolumbije ne bi smel biti več odobren, treba pa je spremeniti del 1 Priloge II k Odločbi 79/542/EGS.
In order to give the possibility to the relevant stakeholders to adapt to the new import regime it is appropriate to provide that the present Decision applies from 1 December 2007.
Da se ustreznim zainteresiranim stranem omogoči možnost, da se prilagodijo novemu uvoznemu režimu, je primerno zagotoviti, da Odločba začne veljati 1. decembra 2007.
Commission Decision 96/367/EC of 13 June 1996 concerning protection measures in relation to foot-and-mouth disease in Albania [8] and Commission Decision 96/414/EC of 4 July 1996 concerning protective measures with regard to imports of animals and animal products from the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia due to outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease [9] are obsolete as the provisions provided for therein are now laid down in other Community acts.
Odločba Komisije 96/367/ES z dne 13. junija 1996 o zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi s slinavko in parkljevko v Albaniji [8] in Odločba Komisije z dne 4. julija 1996 o ukrepih zaščite v zvezi z uvozom živali in živalskih proizvodov iz Nekdanje jugoslovanske republike Makedonije zaradi izbruhov slinavke in parkljevke [9] sta zastareli, saj so zdaj določbe iz teh odločb vključene v druge akte Skupnosti.
In the interests of clarity and legal certainty, those Decisions should be expressly repealed.
Zaradi jasnosti in pravne varnosti je treba ti odločbi izrecno razveljaviti.
Decisions 96/367/EC and 96/414/EC are repealed.
Odločbi 96/367/ES in 96/414/ES se razveljavita.
Imports of fresh meat to the EU which were authorised under Decision 79/542/EEC which are no longer authorised by the application of the present Decision shall continue to be authorised for a transitional period of 90 days following the date of application.
Uvoz svežega mesa v EU, odobrenega na podlagi Odločbe 79/542/EGS in katerega odobritev preneha z veljavnostjo te odločbe, bo odobren za prehodno obdobje 90 dni po datumu začetka veljavnosti.
This Decision shall apply from 1 December 2007.
Ta odločba se začne uporabljati 1. decembra 2007.
OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 65.
UL L 93, 31.3.2006, str. 65.
OJ L 183, 5.7.2006, p. 20.
UL L 183, 5.7.2006, str. 20.
OJ L 154, 30.4.2004, p. 44. Corrected version (OJ L 189, 27.5.2004, p. 33).
UL L 154, 30.4.2004, str. 44.
Decision as last amended by Decision 2007/362/EC (OJ L 138, 30.5.2007, p. 18).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2007/362/ES (UL L 138, 30.5.2007, str. 18).
OJ L 145, 19.6.1996, p. 17.
UL L 145, 19.6.1996, str. 17.
Decision as amended by Decision 98/373/EC (OJ L 170, 16.6.1998, p. 62).
Odločba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo 98/373/ES (UL L 170, 16.6.1998, str. 62).
OJ L 167, 6.7.1996, p. 58.
UL L 167, 6.7.1996, str. 58.
Decision as amended by Decision 98/373/EC.
Odločba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo 98/373/ES.
LIST OF THIRD COUNTRIES OR PARTS THEREOF [1]• Certificates in accordance with the agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products, OJ L 114, 30.4.2002, p. 132.
SEZNAM TRETJIH DRŽAV ALI DELOV TEH DRŽAV [1]• Spričevala v skladu s sporazumom med Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o trgovini s kmetijskimi proizvodi (UL L 114, 30.4.2002, str. 132).
No certificate laid down and fresh meat imports are prohibited (except for those species where indicated in the line for the whole country).
Spričevalo ni določeno in uvoz svežega mesa je prepovedan (razen za vrste, ki so navedene v vrstici, ki se nanaša na celotno območje države).
Closing date [2]
Končni datum [2]
Opening date [3]
Začetni datum [3]
The Provinces of: Buenos Aires, Catamarca, Corrientes (except the departments of Berón de Astrada, Capital, Empedrado, General Paz, Itati, Mbucuruyá, San Cosme and San Luís del Palmar), Entre Ríos, La Rioja, Mendoza, Misiones, Neuquen, Rio Negro, San Juan, San Luis, Santa Fe, Tucuman, Cordoba, La Pampa, Santiago del Estero, Chaco Formosa, Jujuy and Salta, excluding the buffer area of 25 km from the border with Bolivia and Paraguay that extends from the Santa Catalina District in the Province of Jujuy, to the Laishi District in the Province of Formosa
La Pampa, Santiago del Estero, Chaco Formosa, Jujuy in Salta, razen varovalnega pasu 25 km od meje z Bolivijo in Paragvajem, ki se razteza od okraja Santa Catalina v provinci Jujuy do okraja Laishi v provinci Formosa
18 March 2005
marec 2005
1 December 2007
december 2007
1 March 2002
marec 2002
Corrientes: the departments of Berón de Astrada, Capital, Empedrado, General Paz, Itati, Mbucuruyá, San Cosme and San Luís del Palmar
Corrientes: departmaji Berón de Astrada, Capital, Empedrado, General Paz, Itati, Mbucuruyá, San Cosme in San Luís del Palmar
Part of the State of Minas Gerais (except regional delegations of Oliveira, Passos, São Gonçalo de Sapucai, Setelagoas and Bambuí), State of Espíritu Santo, State of Goias, Part of the State of Mato Grosso comprising the regional units of:
Del zvezne države Minas Gerais (razen regijskih okrožij Oliveira, Passos, São Gonçalo de Sapucai, Setelagoas in Bambuí); Zvezna država Espíritu Santo; Zvezna država Goias; del zvezne države Mato Gross, vključno z območnimi enotami:
Cuiaba (except for the municipalities of San Antonio de Leverger, Nossa Senhora do Livramento, Pocone and Barão de Melgaço),
Cuiaba (razen občin San Antonio de Leverger, Nossa Senhora do Livramento, Pocone in Barão de Melgaço),
Caceres (except for the municipality of Caceres),
Caceres (razen občine Caceres),
Rondonopolis (except for the municipality of Itiquiora),
Rondonopolis (razen občine Itiquiora), Barra do Garça,
Barra do Burgres, State of Rio Grande do Sul
Zvezna država Rio Grande do Sul
A and I
A in I
The veterinary disease control zones 3c, 4b, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 18
Območja pod veterinarskim nadzorom bolezni št. 3c, 4b, 5, 6, 8, 9 in 18
7 March 2002
marec 2002
ME — Montenegro
ME – Črna gora
MK — Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [4]
MK – Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija [4]
RS — Serbia [5]
RS – Srbija [5]
Region of Murmansk, Yamolo-Nenets autonomous area
Regija Murmansk, avtonomno območje Yamolo-Nenets