natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, economic interests directly linked to the contract concerned should not constitute overriding reasons.
Vendar pa ekonomski interesi, neposredno povezani z zadevnim naročilom, ne bi smeli predstavljati prevladujočih razlogov.
Furthermore, the need to ensure over time the legal certainty of decisions taken by contracting authorities and contracting entities requires the establishment of a reasonable minimum period of limitation on reviews seeking to establish that the contract is ineffective.
Poleg tega potreba, da se postopoma zagotovi pravna varnost odločitev, ki jih sprejmejo naročniki, zahteva uvedbo razumnega minimalnega zastaralnega roka revizij, s katerimi se ugotavlja, da je pogodba neveljavna.
In order to avoid legal uncertainty which may result from ineffectiveness, Member States should provide for an exemption from any finding of ineffectiveness in cases where the contracting authority or contracting entity considers that the direct award of any contract without prior publication of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Union is permissible in accordance with Directives 2004/18/EC and 2004/17/EC and has applied a minimum standstill period allowing for effective remedies.
Da bi se izognili pravni negotovosti, ki bi lahko nastala zaradi neveljavnosti, bi morale države članice dovoliti izjemo od katere koli ugotovljene neveljavnosti, v primerih, kadar naročnik meni, da je oddaja katerega koli naročila na podlagi neposrednega dogovora brez predhodne objave obvestila o naročilu v Uradnem listu Evropske unije dopustna v skladu z direktivama 2004/18/ES in 2004/17/ES, in je uporabil minimalno obdobje mirovanja, ki omogoča učinkovita pravna sredstva.
The voluntary publication which triggers this standstill period does not imply any extension of obligations deriving from Directive 2004/18/EC or Directive 2004/17/EC.
Takšna prostovoljna objava, ki povzroči obdobje mirovanja, ne pomeni razširitve obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz Direktive 2004/18/ES ali Direktive 2004/17/ES.
As this Directive strengthens national review procedures, especially in cases of an illegal direct award, economic operators should be encouraged to make use of these new mechanisms.
S to direktivo se krepijo nacionalni revizijski postopki zlasti v primerih naročil, oddanih nezakonito na podlagi neposrednega dogovora, zato bi bilo treba gospodarske subjekte spodbujati k uporabi teh novih mehanizmov.
For reasons of legal certainty the enforceability of the ineffectiveness of a contract is limited to a certain period.
Zaradi pravne gotovosti je izvršljivost neveljavnosti naročila omejena na določeno obdobje.
The effectiveness of these time limits should be respected.
Treba je spoštovati veljavnost teh časovnih omejitev.
Strengthening the effectiveness of national review procedures should encourage those concerned to make greater use of the possibilities for review by way of interlocutory procedure before the conclusion of a contract.
Izboljšanje učinkovitosti nacionalnih revizijskih postopkov bi moralo zadevne osebe spodbuditi, da večkrat izkoristijo možnosti revizije z uporabo postopka, ki zadrži nadaljnje aktivnosti naročnika pred sklenitvijo pogodbe.
In those circumstances, the corrective mechanism should be refocused on serious infringements of Community law on public procurement.
V teh okoliščinah bi bilo treba korektivni mehanizem usmeriti na primere hujših kršitev prava Skupnosti na področju javnih naročil.
The voluntary attestation system provided for by Directive 92/13/EEC, whereby contracting entities have the possibility of having the conformity of their award procedures established through periodic examinations, has been virtually unused.
Prostovoljni sistem izdajanja potrdil iz Direktive 92/13/EGS, s katerim imajo naročniki možnost, da ob rednih pregledih ugotovijo skladnost svojih postopkov oddaje javnih naročil, se skoraj ni uporabljal.
It cannot thus achieve its objective of preventing a significant number of infringements of Community law on public procurement.
Tako ne more izpolniti svojega cilja preprečevanja večjega števila kršitev zakonodaje Skupnosti na področju javnih naročil.
On the other hand, the requirement imposed on Member States by Directive 92/13/EEC to ensure the permanent availability of bodies accredited for this purpose can represent an administrative maintenance cost which is no longer justified in the light of the lack of real demand by contracting entities.
Na drugi strani pa lahko obveznost, ki jo državam članicam nalaga Direktiva 92/13/EGS, da morajo zagotoviti, da so stalno na voljo organi, pooblaščeni v ta namen, pomeni upravni strošek vzdrževanja, ki zaradi pomanjkanja dejanskega povpraševanja s strani naročnikov ni več utemeljen.
For these reasons, the attestation system should be abolished.
Zaradi tega bi bilo treba ta sistem izdajanja potrdil odpraviti.
Similarly, the conciliation mechanism provided for by Directive 92/13/EEC has not elicited any real interest from economic operators.
Podobno pomirjevalni postopek, določen v Direktivi 92/13/EGS, ni vzbudil dejanskega zanimanja pri gospodarskih subjektih.
This is due both to the fact that it does not of itself make it possible to obtain binding interim measures likely to prevent in time the illegal conclusion of a contract, and also to its nature, which is not readily compatible with observance of the particularly short deadlines applicable to reviews seeking interim measures and the setting aside of decisions taken unlawfully.
To je posledica tega, da sam po sebi ne omogoča pridobitve zavezujočih začasnih ukrepov, ki bi lahko pravočasno preprečili nezakonito sklenitev pogodbe, kot tudi tega, da je njegova narava težko združljiva z upoštevanjem izredno kratkih rokov revizij, ki se uporabljajo za sprejetje začasnih ukrepov in razveljavitev nezakonitih odločitev.
In addition, the potential effectiveness of the conciliation mechanism has been weakened further by the difficulties encountered in establishing a complete and sufficiently wide list of independent conciliators in each Member State, available at any time and capable of dealing with conciliation requests at very short notice.
Poleg tega so morebitno učinkovitost pomirjevalnega postopka še dodatno oslabile težave, nastale pri sestavljanju popolnega in dovolj obsežnega seznama neodvisnih pomirjevalcev iz vsake države članice, ki so vedno na voljo in lahko v zelo kratkem roku obravnavajo zahteve za pomiritev.
For these reasons, the conciliation mechanism should be abolished.
Zaradi tega bi bilo treba pomirjevalni postopek odpraviti.
The Commission should be entitled to request Member States to provide it with information on the operation of national review procedures proportionate to the objective pursued by involving the Advisory Committee for Public Contracts in determining the extent and nature of such information.
Komisija bi morala imeti pravico, da od držav članic zahteva, da ji pošiljajo podatke o delovanju nacionalnih revizijskih postopkov, sorazmerno s predvidenimi cilji, in sicer tako, da se Svetovalni odbor za javna naročila vključi v postopek določanja obsega in vrste teh podatkov.
Indeed, only by making such information available will it be possible to assess correctly the effects of the changes introduced by this Directive at the end of a significant period of implementation.
Samo razpoložljivost teh podatkov lahko namreč omogoči, da se pravilno ocenijo posledice sprememb, uvedenih s to direktivo ob izteku daljšega obdobja njenega izvajanja.
The Commission should review progress made in the Member States and report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the effectiveness of this Directive no later than three years after its deadline for implementation.
Komisija bi morala pregledati napredek v državah članicah in Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o učinkovitosti te direktive poročati najpozneje tri leta po poteku roka za začetek njenega izvajanja.
The measures necessary for the implementation of Directives 89/665/EEC and 92/13/EEC should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission [8].
Ukrepe, potrebne za izvajanje direktiv 89/665/EGS in 92/12/EGS bi bilo treba sprejeti v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil [8].
Since, for the reasons stated above, the objective of this Directive, namely improving the effectiveness of review procedures concerning the award of contracts falling within the scope of Directives 2004/18/EC and 2004/17/EC, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Ker iz zgoraj navedenih razlogov cilja te direktive, in sicer izboljšanja učinkovitosti revizijskih postopkov oddaje javnih naročil, ki sodijo na področje uporabe direktiv 2004/18/ES in 2004/17/ES, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker te cilje lažje doseže Skupnost, Skupnost lahko sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective, while respecting the principle of the procedural autonomy of the Member States.
Skladno z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne prekoračuje okvirov, ki so potrebni za doseganje navedenega cilja, zlasti ob upoštevanju načela postopkovne avtonomnosti držav članic.
In accordance with point 34 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making [9], Member States should draw up, for themselves and in the interests of the Community, their own tables illustrating the correlation between this Directive and the transposition measures, and make them public.
V skladu s točko 34 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje [9] se države članice poziva, da za lastne potrebe in v interesu Skupnosti pripravijo tabele, ki naj kar najbolj nazorno prikazujejo korelacijo med to direktivo in ukrepi za prenos, ter da te tabele objavijo.
This Directive respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Ta direktiva spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, priznana zlasti v Listini o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije.
In particular, this Directive seeks to ensure full respect for the right to an effective remedy and to a fair hearing, in accordance with the first and second subparagraphs of Article 47 of the Charter.
Ta direktiva želi zlasti zagotoviti polno upoštevanje pravice do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva in poštene obravnave pred sodiščem v skladu s prvim in drugim pododstavkom člena 47 Listine.
Directives 89/665/EEC and 92/13/EEC should therefore be amended accordingly,
Direktivi 89/665/EGS in 92/13/EGS bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Amendments to Directive 89/665/EEC
Spremembe Direktive 89/665/EGS
Directive 89/665/EEC is hereby amended as follows:
Direktiva 89/665/EGS se spremeni:
Articles 1 and 2 shall be replaced by the following:
člena 1 in 2 se nadomestita z naslednjim:
Scope and availability of review procedures
Področje uporabe in zagotovitev revizijskih postopkov
This Directive applies to contracts referred to in Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, unless such contracts are excluded in accordance with Articles 10 to 18 of that Directive.
Ta direktiva se uporablja za javna naročila iz Direktive 2004/18/ES Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil gradenj, blaga in storitev, razen če so takšna naročila izključena v skladu s členi 10 do 18 navedene direktive.
Contracts within the meaning of this Directive include public contracts, framework agreements, public works concessions and dynamic purchasing systems.
Naročila v smislu te direktive zajemajo javna naročila, okvirne sporazume, koncesije za javne gradnje in dinamične nakupovalne sisteme.
Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that, as regards contracts falling within the scope of Directive 2004/18/EC, decisions taken by the contracting authorities may be reviewed effectively and, in particular, as rapidly as possible in accordance with the conditions set out in Articles 2 to 2f of this Directive, on the grounds that such decisions have infringed Community law in the field of public procurement or national rules transposing that law.
Države članice sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe, da se v zvezi z javnimi naročili s področja uporabe Direktive 2004/18/ES zagotovi učinkovita in zlasti čim hitrejša revizija odločitev, ki so jih sprejeli naročniki, skladno s pogoji, določenimi v členih 2 do 2f te direktive, na podlagi obrazložitve, da so takšne odločitve kršile zakonodajo Skupnosti na področju javnih naročil ali nacionalne predpise o izvajanju te zakonodaje.
Member States shall ensure that there is no discrimination between undertakings claiming harm in the context of a procedure for the award of a contract as a result of the distinction made by this Directive between national rules implementing Community law and other national rules.
Države članice zagotovijo, da ni diskriminacije med ponudniki, ki trdijo, da so bili pri izvedbi postopka oddaje javnih naročil oškodovani, zato ker ta direktiva razlikuje med nacionalnimi predpisi, s katerimi se izvaja zakonodaja Skupnosti, in drugimi nacionalnimi predpisi.
Member States shall ensure that the review procedures are available, under detailed rules which the Member States may establish, at least to any person having or having had an interest in obtaining a particular contract and who has been or risks being harmed by an alleged infringement.
Države članice zagotovijo, da so revizijski postopki v skladu z natančnimi pravili, ki jih lahko določi država članica, na voljo vsem osebam, ki imajo ali so imeli interes za pridobitev določenega javnega naročila in ki jim je z domnevno kršitvijo nastala škoda ali bi jim lahko nastala škoda.
Member States may require that the person wishing to use a review procedure has notified the contracting authority of the alleged infringement and of his intention to seek review, provided that this does not affect the standstill period in accordance with Article 2a(2) or any other time limits for applying for review in accordance with Article 2c.
Države članice lahko zahtevajo, da mora oseba, ki želi uporabiti revizijski postopek, naročnika obvestiti o domnevni kršitvi in o svoji nameri, da bo zahtevala revizijo, pod pogojem, da to ne vpliva na obdobje mirovanja v skladu s členom 2a(2) oziroma katere koli druge časovne omejitve za vložitev zahtevka za revizijo v skladu s členom 2c.
Member States may require that the person concerned first seek review with the contracting authority.
Države članice lahko zahtevajo, da zadevna oseba revizijo najprej vloži pri naročniku.
In that case, Member States shall ensure that the submission of such an application for review results in immediate suspension of the possibility to conclude the contract.
V tem primeru države članice zagotovijo, da se s predložitvijo takšnega zahtevka za revizijo takoj začasno prekine možnost sklenitve pogodbe.
Member States shall decide on the appropriate means of communication, including fax or electronic means, to be used for the application for review provided for in the first subparagraph.
Države članice se odločijo glede primernega načina obveščanja, vključno s faksom ali v elektronski obliki, ki se uporabi za zahtevek za revizijo, predvideno v prvem pododstavku.
The suspension referred to in the first subparagraph shall not end before the expiry of a period of at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contracting authority has sent a reply if fax or electronic means are used, or, if other means of communication are used, before the expiry of either at least 15 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contracting authority has sent a reply, or at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date of the receipt of a reply.
Začasna prekinitev iz prvega pododstavka se ne konča pred potekom roka, ki ne sme biti krajši od 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko je naročnik poslal svoj odgovor, če je za to uporabil faks ali elektronska komunikacijska sredstva, oziroma, če so bila uporabljena druga komunikacijska sredstva, pred potekom roka, ki ne sme biti krajši od 15 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko je naročnik poslal svoj odgovor, ali od roka 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu prejema odgovora.
Member States shall ensure that the measures taken concerning the review procedures specified in Article 1 include provision for powers to:
Države članice zagotovijo, da sprejeti ukrepi v zvezi z revizijskimi postopki, določenimi v členu 1, vključujejo zagotovitev pooblastil, da:
take, at the earliest opportunity and by way of interlocutory procedures, interim measures with the aim of correcting the alleged infringement or preventing further damage to the interests concerned, including measures to suspend or to ensure the suspension of the procedure for the award of a public contract or the implementation of any decision taken by the contracting authority;
se kar najbolj zgodaj in z začasnimi postopki sprejmejo začasni ukrepi, s katerimi naj bi se odpravile domnevne kršitve ali preprečilo nadaljnje škodovanje zadevnim interesom, vključno z ukrepi, s katerimi se začasno prekine ali zagotovi začasna prekinitev postopka oddaje javnih naročil ali izvajanje katere koli odločitve, ki jo sprejme naročnik;
either set aside or ensure the setting aside of decisions taken unlawfully, including the removal of discriminatory technical, economic or financial specifications in the invitation to tender, the contract documents or in any other document relating to the contract award procedure;
se razveljavi ali zagotovi razveljavitev protizakonito sprejetih odločitev, vključno z odpravo diskriminatornih tehničnih, ekonomskih ali finančnih specifikacij v razpisu, razpisni dokumentaciji ali v katerih koli drugih dokumentih, ki se nanašajo na postopek oddaje javnega naročila;
award damages to persons harmed by an infringement.
se dodeli nadomestilo za škodo osebam, ki so bile oškodovane zaradi kršitve.
The powers specified in paragraph 1 and Articles 2d and 2e may be conferred on separate bodies responsible for different aspects of the review procedure.
Pooblastila, navedena v odstavku 1 ter členih 2d in 2e, se lahko prenesejo na ločene organe, ki so pristojni za različne vidike revizijskega postopka.
When a body of first instance, which is independent of the contracting authority, reviews a contract award decision, Member States shall ensure that the contracting authority cannot conclude the contract before the review body has made a decision on the application either for interim measures or for review.
Če prvostopenjski organ, ki je neodvisen od naročnika, opravi revizijo odločitve o oddaji javnega naročila, države članice zagotovijo, da naročnik ne more skleniti pogodbe, dokler revizijski organ ne sprejme odločitve glede zahtevka za začasne ukrepe ali za revizijo.
The suspension shall end no earlier than the expiry of the standstill period referred to in Article 2a(2) and Article 2d(4) and (5).
Začasna prekinitev se ne sme končati pred potekom obdobja mirovanja iz člena 2a(2) in člena 2d(4) in (5).
Except where provided for in paragraph 3 and Article 1(5), review procedures need not necessarily have an automatic suspensive effect on the contract award procedures to which they relate.
Razen v primerih iz odstavka 3 in člena 1(5) ni nujno, da imajo revizijski postopki sami po sebi samodejni suspenzivni učinek na postopke oddaje javnega naročila, na katere se nanašajo.
Member States may provide that the body responsible for review procedures may take into account the probable consequences of interim measures for all interests likely to be harmed, as well as the public interest, and may decide not to grant such measures when their negative consequences could exceed their benefits.
Države članice lahko predvidijo, da lahko organ, pristojen za revizijske postopke, upošteva verjetne posledice začasnih ukrepov za vse interese, ki se jim lahko povzroči škoda, in javni interes, ter odloči, da takšnih ukrepov ne uvede, če obstaja možnost, da bi njihove negativne posledice presegale njihove prednosti.
A decision not to grant interim measures shall not prejudice any other claim of the person seeking such measures.
Odločitev, da se začasni ukrepi ne odobrijo, ne posega v druge zahtevke osebe, ki zahteva takšne ukrepe.
Member States may provide that where damages are claimed on the grounds that a decision was taken unlawfully, the contested decision must first be set aside by a body having the necessary powers.
Države članice lahko predvidijo, da mora organ s potrebnimi pooblastili, kadar se nadomestilo za škodo zahteva na podlagi protizakonito sprejete odločitve, najprej razveljaviti izpodbijano odločitev.
Except where provided for in Articles 2d to 2f, the effects of the exercise of the powers referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article on a contract concluded subsequent to its award shall be determined by national law.
Razen v primerih, določenih v členih 2d do 2f, se učinki izvajanja pooblastil iz odstavka 1 tega člena na pogodbo, ki se sklene po oddaji naročila, določijo v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo.
Furthermore, except where a decision must be set aside prior to the award of damages, a Member State may provide that, after the conclusion of a contract in accordance with Article 1(5), paragraph 3 of this Article or Articles 2a to 2f, the powers of the body responsible for review procedures shall be limited to awarding damages to any person harmed by an infringement.
Poleg tega lahko država članica, razen kadar je treba odločitev razveljaviti pred dodelitvijo nadomestila za škodo, predvidi, da se po sklenitvi pogodbe v skladu s členom 1(5), odstavkom 3 tega člena ali členi 2a do 2f, pooblastila organa, pristojnega za revizijske postopke, omejijo na dodelitev odškodnine vsem osebam, ki so bile oškodovane zaradi kršitve.
Member States shall ensure that decisions taken by bodies responsible for review procedures can be effectively enforced.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se odločitve, ki jih sprejmejo organi, pristojni za revizijske postopke, lahko učinkovito izvajajo.
Where bodies responsible for review procedures are not judicial in character, written reasons for their decisions shall always be given.
Kadar organi, pristojni za revizijske postopke, po svoji naravi niso sodni, se vedno navedejo pisni razlogi za njihove odločitve.
Furthermore, in such a case, provision must be made to guarantee procedures whereby any allegedly illegal measure taken by the review body or any alleged defect in the exercise of the powers conferred on it can be the subject of judicial review or review by another body which is a court or tribunal within the meaning of Article 234 of the Treaty and independent of both the contracting authority and the review body.
Poleg tega je v takšnem primeru treba določiti postopke, s katerimi je kakršen koli domnevno nezakonit ukrep, ki ga sprejme revizijski organ, ali domnevna napaka pri izvrševanju pooblastil, ki so mu podeljena, lahko predmet sodnega postopka ali revizije s strani drugega organa, ki je sodišče v smislu člena 234 Pogodbe in je neodvisen od naročnika in tudi od revizijskega organa.
The members of such an independent body shall be appointed and leave office under the same conditions as members of the judiciary as regards the authority responsible for their appointment, their period of office, and their removal.
Člani takšnega neodvisnega organa so imenovani in razrešeni pod istimi pogoji kakor člani sodstva, kar zadeva organ oblasti, odgovoren za njihovo imenovanje, mandat in razrešitev.