natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
People’s Republic of China (PRC) and Ukraine
Ljudska republika Kitajska („LRK“) in Ukrajina
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC and Ukraine, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of the said Article for those producers which were found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe se v protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz LRK in Ukrajine normalna vrednost določi v skladu z odstavki 1 do 6 navedenega člena za tiste proizvajalce, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo merila, določena v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
business decisions and costs are made in response to market conditions and without significant State interference;
poslovne odločitve in stroški nastanejo kot odziv na tržne razmere in brez večjega poseganja države;
firms have one clear set of basic accounting records which are independently audited in line with international accounting standards and are applied for all purposes;
podjetja imajo jasno določeno zbirko računovodskih evidenc, ki se pregledujejo neodvisno v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi in se uporabljajo v vse namene;
there are no significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system;
odsotnost znatnih izkrivljanj, prenesenih iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva;
bankruptcy and property laws guarantee legal certainty and stability;
stečajno pravo in pravo lastninskih razmerij zagotavljata pravno varnost in stabilnost;
One exporting producer in the PRC requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation and replied to the MET claim form for exporting producers within the given deadline.
En proizvajalec izvoznik iz LRK je zahteval TGO v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe in je v danem roku izpolnil obrazec zahtevka za TGO za proizvajalce izvoznike.
The Commission sought and verified at the premises of this company all necessary information submitted in its MET application as deemed necessary.
Komisija je v prostorih te družbe poiskala in preverila vse potrebne informacije, navedene v njenem zahtevku za TGO, za katere je menila, da je to potrebno.
The investigation revealed that the MET claim had to be rejected for this company as the company did not meet the requirements of the above-mentioned criteria one, two and three.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je bilo treba zahtevek za TGO za to družbo zavrniti, ker ni izpolnila zahtev zgoraj navedenih meril ena, dva in tri.
Due to the fact that the main shareholders are State-owned enterprises and that the directors appointed by these shareholders hold a disproportionate and controlling number of positions in the Board of Directors, it was found that the State could exert significant influence on the company’s business decisions regarding day to day management as well as on profit distribution, issuing of new shares, capital increases, amendment of the Articles of Association and the dissolution of the company, and that therefore, such decisions were not made in response to market signals.
Ker so glavni delničarji državna podjetja in imajo direktorji, ki so jih ti delničarji imenovali, nesorazmerno veliko število sedežev v nadzornem svetu in s tem tudi nadzor, je bilo ugotovljeno, da bi država v veliki meri uveljavljala svoj vpliv na poslovne odločitve družbe glede vsakodnevnega upravljanja ter razdeljevanje dobička, izdajanja novih delnic, večanja kapitala, spreminjanja statuta ter popolnega prenehanja družbe in da zato take odločitve niso bile sprejete kot odziv na tržne razmere.
In addition, the company’s accounts did not reflect the true financial situation since the company made some reallocations for the depreciation of fixed assets without justification, which constitutes a violation of IAS 1-13.
Poleg tega računovodske evidence družbe niso odražale pravilnega finančnega stanja, saj je družba neupravičeno porazdelila amortizacijo stalnih sredstev, kar pomeni kršitev IAS 1–13.
This, together with the fact that the auditors of the company did not express any reservations or explanations about the practices found, constituted a clear violation of international accounting standards.
S tem in ker revizorji družbe niso izrazili nobenih zadržkov ali pojasnil v zvezi z ugotovljenimi praksami, so bili jasno kršeni mednarodni računovodski standardi.
With regard to the valuation of initial assets, the company was not able to provide any explanation as to the basis on which such a valuation was made.
Glede na vrednotenje začetnih sredstev družba ni mogla zagotoviti kakršnih koli pojasnil o osnovi, na kateri je bila ta ocena opravljena.
Finally, the company could not provide any proof of payment of the rent of the office building.
Družba tudi ni mogla zagotoviti kakršnih koli dokazov o plačilu najemnine za poslovno stavbo.
Both deficiencies indicated that there were significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system.
Obe nepravilnosti kažeta na znatna izkrivljanja, prenesena iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva.
The Advisory Committee was consulted and the parties directly concerned were given an opportunity to comment on the above findings.
Komisija se je posvetovala s svetovalnim odborom, stranke, ki jih to neposredno zadeva, pa so dobile možnost, da dajo pripombe na zgornje ugotovitve.
However, no comments were received.
Vendar te niso predložile nobenih pripomb.
The Community industry was also given the opportunity to comment, and agreed with the MET determination.
Tudi industriji Skupnosti je bila dana možnost za pripombe in ta se je strinjala z določitvijo TGO.
Following the above, it was concluded that MET should not be granted to the Chinese exporting producer.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je bilo sklenjeno, da se TGO kitajskemu proizvajalcu izvozniku ne odobri.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation a country-wide duty, if any, is established for countries falling under that Article, except in those cases where companies are able to demonstrate that they meet all criteria set out in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation for receiving individual treatment.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe se za države, ki jih zajema navedeni člen, uvede dajatev na ravni države, če sploh, razen v primerih, ko lahko družbe dokažejo, da izpolnjujejo vsa merila za individualno obravnavo, določena v členu 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
The Chinese exporting producer to which MET could not be granted also claimed IT in the event it was not granted MET.
Kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik, kateremu TGO ni bilo mogoče odobriti, je v primeru, da mu ta ne bi bil odobren, zahteval IO.
However, as described in recital 51, the State was found to exert, via its representatives in the company’s Board of Directors, significant influence with regard to export prices and quantities, as well as conditions and terms of sale, in such a way that these could not be considered to be freely determined.
Vendar je bilo, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 51, ugotovljeno, da je država prek svojih predstavnikov v nadzornem odboru družbe izvajala znaten vpliv v zvezi z izvoznimi cenami in količinami ter pogoji prodaje, tako da se zanje ne more šteti, da so prosto oblikovane.
In addition, such State interference, relating to the day-to-day management of the company, meant that the risk of circumvention could not be excluded, if this exporter was to be given an individual duty rate.
Takšno vmešavanje države, povezano z vsakodnevnim upravljanjem družbe, je pomenilo, da tveganja izogibanja ni bilo mogoče izključiti, če bi bila temu izvozniku dodeljena individualna stopnja dajatve.
Consequently, and since it was found that the Chinese exporting producer did not meet all of the requirements to be granted IT in accordance with Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation, IT had to be rejected.
Zato in ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik ni izpolnil vseh zahtev za odobritev IO v skladu s členom 9(5) osnovne uredbe, mu je bilo treba IO zavrniti.
The sole cooperating exporting producer in Ukraine, not having claimed MET, requested only IT.
Edini sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik v Ukrajini, ki ni zahteval TGO, je zahteval le IO.
However, there is no other known producer of penta in Ukraine, which is confirmed by the fact that exports of penta from Ukraine to the Community reported by the cooperating exporting producer were equivalent to the quantities indicated by Eurostat.
Vendar v Ukrajini ni nobenega drugega znanega proizvajalca pentaeritritola, kar potrjuje tudi dejstvo, da je izvoz pentaeritritola iz Ukrajine v Skupnost, o katerem je poročal sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik, ustrezal količinam, ki jih je navedel Eurostat.
Therefore, it was considered unnecessary to make a determination whether this exporting producer should be granted IT since a single country-wide duty would be imposed in any event.
Zato se ni zdelo potrebno odločiti, ali naj se temu proizvajalcu izvozniku IO odobri, saj bi bila v vsakem primeru uvedena ena dajatev za celotno državo.
According to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, normal value for the exporting producers not granted MET has to be established on the basis of the prices or a constructed normal value in an analogue country.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe mora biti normalna vrednost za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim TGO ni bil odobren, določena na podlagi cen ali konstruirane normalne vrednosti v primerljivi državi.
In the notice of initiation, the Commission indicated its intention to use Japan as an appropriate analogue country for the purpose of establishing normal value for the PRC and Ukraine and interested parties were invited to comment on this.
V obvestilu o začetku je Komisija navedla, da namerava za določitev normalne vrednosti za LRK in Ukrajino uporabiti Japonsko kot ustrezno primerljivo državo, zainteresirane stranke pa so bile pozvane, da predložijo svoje pripombe v zvezi s tem.
The Commission contacted the known producer of penta in Japan and asked for its cooperation in the present proceeding.
Komisija je stopila v stik z znanim japonskim proizvajalcem pentaeritritola in ga prosila za sodelovanje v tem postopku.
However, no cooperation could be obtained.
Vendar ta ni želel sodelovati.
Initially, countries concerned by the present proceeding were not selected because there was either no cooperation or because their domestic market could be distorted because of the dumping being practised.
Prvotno države, ki jih zadeva ta postopek, niso bile izbrane bodisi zaradi nesodelovanja ali zaradi verjetnosti, da je damping izkrivil njihov domač trg.
Therefore the Commission sought cooperation from all other known producers in Chile, Taiwan, Brazil and the Republic of Korea, the other countries where production of penta takes place.
Zato je Komisija zaprosila za sodelovanje druge znane proizvajalce v Čilu, Tajvanu, Braziliji, Republiki Koreji in v drugih državah, kjer proizvajajo pentaeritritol.
Only the producer in Chile agreed to cooperate.
Samo proizvajalec iz Čila je pristal na sodelovanje.
Although there was just one producer in Chile, the Chilean domestic market of penta was subject to significant competition during the IP due to imports from China, Taiwan, USA, Sweden and the Republic of Korea, as there are neither quotas nor any other quantitative import restrictions in place.
Čeprav je v Čilu samo en proizvajalec pentaeritritola, je bila na čilenskem domačem trgu pentaeritritola v OP zaradi uvoza iz Kitajske, Tajvana, ZDA, Švedske in Republike Koreje velika konkurenca, saj ta država nima določenih kvot ali drugih količinskih omejitev uvoza.
In view of the foregoing it was provisionally concluded that Chile was the most appropriate and reasonable analogue country in accordance with Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se je začasno sklenilo, da predstavljajo Čile najbolj primerno in smiselno primerljivo državo v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe.
A questionnaire was therefore sent to this producer requesting information on domestic sales prices and cost of production of the like product and the data submitted in its reply were verified on the spot.
Temu proizvajalcu je bil zato poslan vprašalnik, v katerem so se zahtevale informacije o domačih prodajnih cenah in stroških proizvodnje podobnega izdelka, podatki, ki jih je predložil, pa so bili preverjeni na kraju samem.
However, the investigation revealed that no dumping was practised by the cooperating Turkish exporting producer.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da sodelujoči turški proizvajalec izvoznik ni izvajal dampinga.
There were no apparent distortions of the Turkish market of penta and the production process and raw materials used by the Turkish producer are more similar to those of the Chinese and Ukrainian exporting producers.
Ni prihajalo do očitnih izkrivljanj turškega trga pentaeritritola, proizvodni proces in surovine, ki jih uporablja turški proizvajalec, so bolj podobni tistim, ki jih uporabljajo kitajski in ukrajinski proizvajalci izvozniki.
Therefore, it was concluded that Turkey could be regarded as a reasonable analogue country for the purpose of this proceeding.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da se Turčija lahko šteje za smiselno primerljivo državo za namen tega postopka.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, normal value for the exporting producers not granted MET was established on the basis of verified information received from the producer in the analogue country.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe je bila normalna vrednost za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim TGO ni bil odobren, določena na podlagi preverjenih informacij proizvajalca iz primerljive države.
Normal value was determined as described above in recitals 32 to 35.
Normalna vrednost je bila določena, kot je opisano v uvodnih izjavah 32 do 35.
All export sales to the Community by the Chinese and Ukrainian exporting producers were made directly to independent customers in the Community and therefore, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable.
Celoten izvoz kitajskih in ukrajinskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Skupnost je bil opravljen neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti, zato je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe, namreč na podlagi cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo.
Since an average normal value for the whole IP was found not to be representative, for the reasons explained above in recitals 33 to 37, monthly average export prices were established.
Ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da povprečna normalna vrednost v celotnem OP ni bila reprezentativna, so bile zaradi razlogov, navedenih v uvodnih izjavah 33 do 37, določene mesečne povprečne izvozne cene.
Adjustments were made in respect of transport, insurance, handling and ancillary costs, packing, credit and bank charges where applicable and justified.
Opravljene so bile prilagoditve v zvezi s stroški prevoza, zavarovanja, manipulativnimi stroški in drugimi tozadevnimi stroški, stroški pakiranja, kredita in bančnimi stroški, kadar je bilo to ustrezno in upravičeno.
For each of the exporting producers not granted MET, the monthly weighted average normal value established for the analogue country was compared with the monthly weighted average export price to the Community, as provided under Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation.
Za vsakega od proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki jim TGO ni bil odobren, se je mesečna tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost, določena za primerljivo državo, primerjala z mesečno tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno v Skupnost, kot je določeno v členu 2(11) osnovne uredbe.
In the case of PRC, the volume of penta exported by the cooperating exporting producer represented significantly less than 70 % of the total volume of penta imported during the IP from that country, according to Eurostat data.
V primeru LRK je po podatkih Eurostata količina pentaeritritola, ki ga je izvozil sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik, predstavljala manj kot 70 % celotne količine pentaeritritola, uvoženega med OP iz navedene države.
Thus, for non-cooperating exporting producers in the PRC, the dumping margin had to be established on the basis of facts available, pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Torej je bilo treba v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe za nesodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK stopnjo dampinga določiti na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev.
Hence, it was considered necessary that the dumping margin be determined on the basis of the highest dumped transactions for the cooperating producer.
Zato se je zdelo potrebno, da se stopnja dampinga določi na podlagi najvišjih dampinških transakcij, ugotovljenih za sodelujočega proizvajalca.
Therefore a countrywide average dumping margin was calculated using as a weighing factor the cif-value of both group of exporters, i.e. cooperators and non-cooperators.
Zato je bila povprečna stopnja dampinga na ravni države izračunana z uporabo vrednosti CIF, kot dejavnika tehtanja, za vsako skupino izvoznikov, tj. sodelujočih in nesodelujočih.
In the case of Ukraine, as explained above in recital 59, due to the high level of cooperation it was considered appropriate to establish the country-wide dumping margin at the same level as the one found for the cooperating exporting producer.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 59, se je v primeru Ukrajine zaradi visoke ravni sodelovanja zdelo primerno, da se določi stopnja dampinga na ravni države na isti ravni kot stopnja za sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika.
The dumping margin, expressed as a percentage of the cif import price at the Community border, duty unpaid, is as follows:
Stopnji dampinga, izraženi kot odstotek uvozne cene CIF meja Skupnosti, brez plačane dajatve, sta:
Russia and the United States of America (USA)
Rusija in Združene države Amerike (ZDA)
None of the producers in Russia and the United States of America cooperated in this investigation.
Nobeden od proizvajalcev iz Rusije ali ZDA ni sodeloval v tej preiskavi.
Consequently, and in the absence of any other more appropriate basis, the country-wide dumping margin was provisionally established on the basis of facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, i.e. data derived from the complaint.
Zato in ker ni na voljo druge primernejše osnove, je bila stopnja dampinga na ravni države začasno določena na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe, tj. podatkov iz pritožbe.
The dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the cif import price at the Community border, duty unpaid, are as follows:
Stopnji dampinga, izraženi kot odstotek uvozne cene CIF meja Skupnosti, brez plačane dajatve, sta:
The investigation established that the like product is manufactured by five producers in the Community, one of which has two production sites.
S preiskavo je bilo ugotovljeno, da podobni izdelek trenutno proizvaja pet proizvajalcev v Skupnosti, eden od njih ima dva proizvodna obrata.
The complaint was lodged on behalf of two of these producers.
Pritožba je bila vložena v imenu dveh od teh proizvajalcev.
After the initiation, a third producer decided to support the proceeding by cooperating fully in the investigation.
Po začetku postopka se je tretji proizvajalec odločil za podporo postopka in v celoti sodeloval pri preiskavi.
Of the remaining two producers, both of which supplied general data on production and sales, both expressed their support for the proceeding.
Oba preostala proizvajalca, ki sta predložila splošne podatke o proizvodnji in prodaji, sta izrazila podporo postopku.
Hence, the volume of Community production for the purpose of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation has been provisionally calculated by adding together the production volume of the three cooperating Community producers and the production volume of the two other producers, according to the data supplied by them.
Zato je bil obseg proizvodnje Skupnosti za namen člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe začasno izračunan tako, da sta se seštela obseg proizvodnje treh sodelujočih proizvajalcev Skupnosti in obseg proizvodnje ostalih dveh proizvajalcev v skladu s podatki, ki sta jih slednja predložila.
On this basis, the total Community production of the like product amounted to 115609 tonnes in the IP.
Na podlagi tega je celotna proizvodnja Skupnosti podobnega izdelka v OP znašala 115609 ton.
The production of the three Community producers that fully cooperated in the investigation represents 94 % of the like product produced in the Community.
Proizvodnja treh proizvajalcev Skupnosti, ki so v celoti sodelovali v preiskavi, predstavlja 94 % podobnega izdelka, proizvedenega v Skupnosti.
They are therefore considered to constitute the Community industry within the meaning of Articles 4(1) and 5(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se šteje, da predstavljajo industrijo Skupnosti v smislu členov 4(1) in 5(4) osnovne uredbe.
Community consumption was established on the basis of the sales volumes of the known producers in the Community plus imports from all third countries under the relevant CN code according to Eurostat.
Po podatkih Eurostata je bila potrošnja Skupnosti določena na podlagi obsega prodaje znanih proizvajalcev v Skupnosti ter uvoza iz vseh tretjih držav pod ustrezno oznako KN.
In this respect it should be noted that only one of the two non-complainant Community producers provided sales figures for the whole period considered.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je le eden od dveh nesodelujočih proizvajalcev Skupnosti predložil podatke za celotno obravnavano obdobje.
Therefore sales of the other producer were not taken into account, as they were only provided for the IP.
Zato se prodaja drugega proizvajalca ni upoštevala, saj je bila posredovana samo za OP.
Since these sales volumes were low, excluding them does not affect the overall picture.
Ker je bil ta obseg prodaje majhen, njegova izključitev ne vpliva na splošno sliko.
As shown in the table below, the Community consumption of the product concerned and the like product decreased by 12 % over the period considered.
Kot je prikazano v spodnji preglednici, se je potrošnja Skupnosti zadevnega in podobnega izdelka v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšala za 12 %.
The demand was stable between 2003 and 2004 whereas in the IP it dropped by 9 % compared to the previous year.
Povpraševanje med letoma 2003 in 2004 je bilo stabilno, v OP pa se je v primerjavi s prejšnjim letom zmanjšalo za 9 %.
Imports into the Community from the countries concerned
Uvoz iz zadevnih držav v Skupnost
The Commission considered whether the effects of imports of penta originating in the PRC, USA, Turkey, Russia and Ukraine should be assessed cumulatively in accordance with Article 3(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je nadalje proučila, ali naj se učinki uvoza pentaeritritola s poreklom iz LRK, ZDA, Turčije, Rusije in Ukrajine ocenijo kumulativno v skladu s členom 3(4) osnovne uredbe.
It is recalled that imports from Turkey were not found to be made at dumped prices and therefore the proceeding should be terminated as regards imports from that country.
Opozoriti je treba, da je bilo ugotovljeno, da se uvoz iz Turčije ni izvajal po dampinških cenah, zato je treba postopek v zvezi z uvozom iz navedene države zaključiti.
The average dumping margins established for each of the four remaining countries, after excluding Turkey, are above the de minimis threshold as defined in Article 9(3) of the basic Regulation, and the volume of imports from each country is not negligible in the sense of Article 5(7) of the basic Regulation, their respective market shares attaining 1,8 % for the PRC, 1,5 % for Russia, 3,7 % for Ukraine and 1,9 % for the USA in the IP.
Splošne stopnje dampinga, določene za vsako od preostalih štirih držav po izključitvi Turčije, so nad pragom de minimis, kot je opredeljeno v členu 9(3) osnovne uredbe, obseg uvoza iz vsake države pa v smislu člena 5(7) osnovne uredbe ni zanemarljiv, njihovi zadevni deleži so namreč v OP dosegli 1,8 % za LRK, 1,5 % za Rusijo, 3,7 % za Ukrajino in 1,9 % za ZDA.