natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
While the price of low-carbon imports from Norway may undercut Community industry prices to some extent, given that this quality of product only represents a small part (roughly 5 %) of the total production of the Community industry, and in view of the absence of overall undercutting and the decrease in both import volumes and market share, it was considered that imports from Norway did not contribute to the material injury suffered by the Community industry.
Cena uvoza z nizko vsebnostjo ogljika iz Norveške sicer lahko do neke mere nelojalno niža cene industrije Skupnosti, vendar glede na to, da izdelek te kakovosti predstavlja samo majhen del (približno 5 %) celotne proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti, in glede na odsotnost splošnega nelojalnega nižanja in zmanjšanja obsega uvoza in tržnega deleža, je bilo sklenjeno, da uvoz iz Norveške ni prispeval k znatni škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
Price of imports (EUR/tonne)
Cena uvoza (EUR/tono)
Imports from India increased by over 300 %, and the market share of those imports increased by 7,3 percentage points (IP = 9,7 %), during the period considered.
Uvoz iz Indije se je v obravnavanem obdobju povečal za 300 %, tržni delež tega uvoza pa se je povečal za 7,3 odstotne točke (OP = 9,7 %).
At the same time the average price of imports from India was slightly higher than those of the Community industry (i.e. no undercutting).
Istočasno je bila povprečna cena uvoza iz Indije rahlo višja od cene industrije Skupnosti (tj. brez nelojalnega nižanja).
In view of the absence of undercutting by imports from India, it is considered that there is no clear evidence that imports from India contributed to the injury suffered by the Community industry.
Glede na odsotnost nelojalnega nižanja cen uvoza iz Indije se sklene, da ni jasnih dokazov, da je uvoz iz Indije prispeval k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
Imports from South Africa decreased by around 38 %, and the market share of those imports decreased by 2,5 percentage points (IP = 3,2 %) during the period considered.
Uvoz iz Južne Afrike se je v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal za 38 %, tržni delež tega uvoza pa se je zmanjšal za 2,5 odstotne točke (OP = 3,2 %).
The average price of imports from South Africa was below that of the Community industry and similar to that practiced by the countries concerned.
Povprečna cena uvoza iz Južne Afrike je bila nižja od cene industrije Skupnosti in podobna ceni, ki velja v zadevnih državah.
It is therefore considered that imports from South Africa may have contributed to the injury suffered by the Community industry.
Zato se šteje, da bi uvoz iz Južne Afrike lahko prispeval k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
However, given the significant overall decrease in imports from South Africa and their small market share, it is considered not sufficient to break the causal link between the material injury suffered by the Community industry and dumped imports from the PRC and Kazakhstan.
Vendar se glede na znatno celotno zmanjšanje obsega uvoza iz Južne Afrike in njegov majhen tržni delež ta uvoz ne šteje kot zadosten za prekinitev vzročne zveze med znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, in dampinškim uvozom iz LRK in Kazahstana.
Market share of imports from S Africa
Tržni delež uvoza iz Južne Afrike
Price of imports from S Africa
Cena uvoza iz Južne Afrike
Imports from other third countries, including Brazil, decreased by around 59 %, and the market share of those imports decreased by around 6,4 percentage points (IP = 3,8 %), during the period considered.
Uvoz iz ostalih tretjih držav, vključno z Brazilijo, se je v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal za 59 %, tržni delež tega uvoza pa se je zmanjšal za 6,4 odstotne točke (OP = 3,8 %).
At the same time, the average price of imports from other third countries was higher than that of the Community industry (i.e. no undercutting).
Istočasno je bila povprečna cena uvoza iz ostalih tretjih držav višja od cene industrije Skupnosti (tj. brez nelojalnega nižanja).
In view of the absence of undercutting by those imports and their decreasing trend, it is considered that they did not contribute to the material injury suffered by the Community industry.
Glede na odsotnost nelojalnega nižanja cen tega uvoza in njegovega padajočega trenda se šteje, da ni prispeval k znatni škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
Other third countries (including Brazil)
Druge tretje države (vključno z Brazilijo)
As indicated in recital 91 above, one Community producer did not cooperate with the investigation.
Kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 90 zgoraj, en proizvajalec Skupnosti ni sodeloval v preiskavi.
Based on information obtained in the course of the investigation from cooperating Community producers, it is estimated that its sales volume in the Community was around 30000 tonnes throughout the period considered.
Na podlagi informacij, ki so jih med preiskavo predložili sodelujoči proizvajalci Skupnosti, se ocenjuje, da je njegov obseg prodaje v Skupnosti v obravnavanem obdobju znašal približno 30000 ton.
Similarly, the corresponding market share was stable throughout the period considered at around 3 %.
Podobno je bil tržni delež v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju stabilen in je znašal približno 3 %.
The other Community producer therefore did not gain any sales volume and market share at the expense of the Community industry.
Zato drugi proizvajalec Skupnosti ni povečal obsega prodaje in tržnega deleža na račun industrije Skupnosti.
No information was available concerning the prices of this Community producer.
Informacije o cenah tega drugega proizvajalca Skupnosti niso bile na voljo.
Source: Investigation, complaint.
Vir: Preiskava, pritožba.
EC Sales volume of the other Community producers (tonnes)
Obseg prodaje drugih proizvajalcev Skupnosti v ES (v tonah)
Market share of the other Community producers
Tržni delež drugih proizvajalcev Skupnosti (v tonah)
Given the above, and given the absence of information to the contrary, it is concluded that the other Community producer has not contributed to the injury suffered by the Community industry.
Glede na navedeno in zaradi pomanjkanja informacij o nasprotnem se sklene, da drugi proizvajalec Skupnosti ni prispeval k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
Cost of production (raw materials)
Proizvodni stroški (surovine)
The main elements in the total cost of production are raw materials (around 45 % to 55 %) and electricity (around 20 % to 30 %).
Glavni elementi v celotnih proizvodnih stroških so surovine (približno 45 % do 55 %) in elektrika (približno 20 % do 30 %).
Direct labour accounts for around 5 % of costs.
Neposredni stroški dela predstavljajo približno 5 % stroškov.
The cost of production of the Community industry increased by 12 % between 2002 and the IP.
Proizvodni stroški industrije Skupnosti so se med letom 2002 in OP povečali za 12 %.
Unit cost of production (EUR/tonne)
Proizvodni stroški na enoto (EUR/tono)
Some interested parties claimed that the injury suffered by the Community industry was attributable to the increases in the cost of production.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so trdile, da je škodo industrije Skupnosti povzročilo povišanje proizvodnih stroškov.
In respect of raw material costs, since these are generally commodity products which, in principle, are traded on the international market, it is considered that the price increase has affected all producers of SiMn, which would normally be forced to increase their sales prices across the board.
Surovine so na splošno bazični proizvodi, s katerimi se trguje na mednarodnem trgu, zato je povišanje cen vplivalo na vse proizvajalce SiMn, ki bi bili običajno svoje prodajne cene prisiljeni zvišati.
The injury was thus not caused by the general increase in raw material prices as such but by the fact that, due to the dumped imports which were undercutting the Community industry's prices, the Community industry was unable to sell at a level that would have allowed it to realise a sufficient profit margin.
Škode torej ni povzročilo splošno povišanje cen surovin kot takšno, ampak dejstvo, da je bila industrija Skupnosti zaradi dampinškega uvoza, ki je nelojalno nižal cene industrije Skupnosti, nezmožna prodajati po cenah, ki bi ji omogočile zadostno stopnjo dobička.
As for labour costs, as indicated in recital 115 above, data concerning productivity show that, overall, the Community industry has managed to offset increases in costs with increases in efficiency and productivity.
Kar zadeva stroške dela, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 115, podatki o produktivnosti kažejo, da je industrija Skupnosti na splošno uspela nadomestiti povišanje stroškov s povečanjem učinkovitosti in produktivnosti.
Some parties referred to electricity costs as the main reason why Community industry would have suffered injury.
Nekatere stranke so se sklicevale na stroške elektrike kot na glavni razlog, zaradi katerega bi industrija Skupnosti utrpela škodo.
In this respect, it was established that the electricity prices for the industrial users in the countries where the Community industry is based were in line with the prices in other major markets in the world and consequently may not be considered as a source of a self-inflicted injury.
V zvezi s tem je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile cene elektrike za industrijske uporabnike v državah, v katerih ima industrija Skupnosti sedež, usklajene s cenami na ostalih pomembnejših trgih v svetu in jih zato ni mogoče šteti kot vzrok samopovzročene škode.
The electricity costs may have had some impact on the overall performance, but only in the case of one Community producer that experienced shortages of the electricity supply due to important increases in the electricity prices and the related dispute with the energy supplier.
Stroški elektrike bi lahko nekoliko vplivali na celotno učinkovitost, vendar samo pri enem proizvajalcu Skupnosti, ki je doživel pomanjkanje oskrbe z električno energijo zaradi znatnega povišanja cen elektrike in s tem povezanega spora z dobaviteljem energije.
It is concluded that, overall, increases in the cost of production have not contributed to the injury suffered by the Community industry.
Sklenjeno je, da povišanje proizvodnih stroškov na splošno ni prispevalo k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
Self-inflicted injury
Samopovzročena škoda
As the investment of one Community producer increased significantly between 2004 and the 2005 (see recital 121), it was examined if the injury was self-inflicted.
Ker je en proizvajalec Skupnosti med letoma 2004 in 2005 znatno povečal naložbe (glej uvodno izjavo 121, je bilo proučeno, ali je bila škoda samopovzročena.
This investment had a direct impact on the cost of production and therefore the profitability of the Community industry.
Te naložbe so neposredno vplivale na proizvodne stroške in zato na dobičkonosnost industrije Skupnosti.
However, the analysis has shown that due to limited weight of this investment in the total cost of production, the impact on the profitability was marginal.
Vendar je analiza pokazala, da je bil vpliv na dobičkonosnost zaradi omejenega pomena teh naložb v celotnih proizvodnih stroških neznaten.
Therefore, it is concluded that the investment of one Community producer may have contributed to the injury suffered by the Community industry but not to an extent to break the causal link.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da bi naložbe enega proizvajalca Skupnosti sicer lahko prispevale k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, vendar ne v tolikšni meri, da bi prekinile vzročno zvezo.
Downturn in the market for silico-manganese due to the cycle in steel production
Upadanje povpraševanja na trgu silicij-mangana zaradi cikla proizvodnje jekla
Some parties claimed that the drop in the demand for steel, and the consequent drop in demand for SiMn, which occurred during the second half of 2004 and the first half of 2005, following the unprecedented increase in demand described in recital 89, contributed to the bad state of the Community industry.
Nekatere stranke so trdile, da je k slabemu stanju industrije Skupnosti prispevalo zmanjšanje povpraševanja po jeklu in posledično zmanjšanje povpraševanja po SiMn, ki se je pojavilo v drugi polovici leta 2004 in v prvi polovici leta 2005, po neprimerljivem povečanju povpraševanja, opisanem v uvodni izjavi 89.
However, the investigation has shown that over the full period considered Community consumption increased overall by 9 %.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da se je v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju potrošnja Skupnosti na splošno povečala za 9 %.
In view of this, the argument is rejected.
Glede na to se trditev zavrne.
The coincidence in time between, on the one hand, the increase in dumped imports from the PRC and Kazakhstan, the increase in market shares and the undercutting found and, on the other hand, the deterioration in the situation of the Community industry, leads to the conclusion that the dumped imports caused the material injury suffered by the Community industry within the meaning of Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation.
Istočasno povečanje dampinškega uvoza iz LRK in Kazahstana ter njunega tržnega deleža ter ugotovljeno nelojalno nižanje cen na eni strani in poslabšanje stanja industrije Skupnosti na drugi strani vodi v sklep, da je dampinški uvoz industriji Skupnosti povzročil znatno škodo v smislu člena 3(6) osnovne uredbe.
Other factors were analysed but were found not to be a determining reason for the injury suffered.
Drugi dejavniki so bili analizirani, vendar je bilo ugotovljeno, da niso odločilni razlog za utrpelo škodo.
As concerns Ukraine, which represents 23 % of market share, since there is no undercutting overall, it is considered that its imports did not contribute to the injury of the Community industry.
Kar zadeva Ukrajino, ki predstavlja 23 % tržnega deleža, se zaradi splošne odsotnosti nelojalnega nižanja šteje, da njen uvoz ni prispeval k škodi industrije Skupnosti.
Imports from South Africa may have contributed to the injury suffered by the Community industry, but given their small market share and declining volumes not to an extent sufficient to break the causal link established with the imports from the PRC and Kazakhstan.
Uvoz iz Južne Afrike bi lahko prispeval k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, toda glede na majhen tržni delež in zniževanje obsega ne bi zadoščal za prekinitev vzročne zveze, vzpostavljene z uvozom iz LRK in Kazahstana.
Due to the lack of undercutting, the import volumes and trend figures, there is also no evidence that imports from India or other third counties (including Brazil) have contributed to the injury suffered by the Community industry.
Glede na odsotnost nelojalnega nižanja, obseg uvoza in podatke o gibanjih, tudi ni nobenega dokaza, da je uvoz iz Indije ali ostalih tretjih držav (vključno z Brazilijo) prispeval k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
The investment of one Community producer may have contributed to the injury suffered by the Community industry; however, due to limited weight of this investment, not to an extent to break the causal link.
Naložbe enega proizvajalca Skupnosti bi lahko prispevale k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, vendar zaradi omejenega pomena teh naložb ne v tolikšni meri, da bi se prekinila vzročna zveza.
Moreover, no other known factor, i.e. the export performance of the Community industry, competition from the other Community producer, the increase in cost of production or the market cycle for steel, has contributed to the injury of the Community industry.
Poleg tega ni noben znan dejavnik, tj. izvoz industrije Skupnosti, konkurenca drugega proizvajalca Skupnosti, naložbe enega proizvajalca Skupnosti ali gospodarski cikel trga za jeklo, prispeval k škodi industrije Skupnosti.
Based on the above analysis, which has properly distinguished and separated the effects of all known factors having an effect on the situation of the Community industry from the injurious effect of the dumped imports, it is concluded that the imports from the PRC and Kazakhstan have caused material injury to the Community industry within the meaning of Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi zgoraj omenjene analize, ki je ustrezno opredelila in ločila učinke vseh znanih dejavnikov, ki vplivajo na stanje industrije Skupnosti, od škodljivih učinkov dampinškega uvoza, se sklene, da je uvoz iz LRK in Kazahstana industriji Skupnosti povzročil znatno škodo v smislu člena 3(6) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission examined whether, despite the conclusions on dumping, injury and causation, compelling reasons existed which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to adopt measures in this particular case.
Komisija je proučila, ali morda kljub sklepom o dampingu, škodi in vzročni zvezi obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi, zaradi katerih bi bilo mogoče sklepati, da sprejetje ukrepov v tem konkretnem primeru ni v interesu Skupnosti.
For this purpose, and pursuant to Article 21(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission considered the likely impact of measures on all parties involved as well as the likely consequences of not taking measures.
V ta namen in v skladu s členom 21(1) osnovne uredbe je Komisija proučila možni vpliv ukrepov za vse vključene stranke in tudi morebitne posledice nesprejetja ukrepov.
In the light of the foregoing, measures would be imposed on imports from the PRC and Kazakhstan.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno bi se uvedli ukrepi za uvoz iz LRK in Kazahstana.
It is expected that the imposition of these measures would lead to an increase in prices for SiMn from those countries and would provide the Community industry with an opportunity to improve its situation through increased prices and possibly through increased sales volumes and market share.
Pričakuje se, da bi uvedba teh ukrepov povišala cene SiMn iz teh držav in bi industriji Skupnosti zagotovila možnost, da z višjimi cenami in morda s povečanim obsegom uvoza in tržnega deleža izboljša svoje stanje.
In the absence of measures, it is expected that imports would continue at low prices from the PRC and Kazakhstan and that the Community industry would not have the opportunity to improve its situation.
Ob neuvedbi ukrepov se pričakuje, da bi bila cena uvoza iz LRK in Kazahstana še naprej nizka in industrija Skupnosti ne bi imela priložnosti za izboljšanje stanja.
As for the low-carbon product, this represents only 5 % of the production of the Community industry and is imported mainly from Norway, but also from the PRC.
Izdelek z nizko vsebnostjo ogljika predstavlja samo 5 % proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti in se uvaža večinoma iz Norveške, pa tudi iz LRK.
While it is considered that, should measures be imposed, the quantities presently coming from the PRC could be to some extent substituted by imports from Norway, the measures would provide the Community industry with the opportunity to increase its own production and sales of low-carbon product in order to meet demand.
Medtem ko se ugotavlja, da bi se količine, ki trenutno prihajajo iz LRK, ob uvedbi ukrepov lahko v določeni meri nadomestile z uvozom iz Norveške, pa bi ti ukrepi za industrijo Skupnosti pomenili priložnost za povečanje proizvodnje in prodaje izdelka z nizko vsebnostjo ogljika, da se zadosti povpraševanju.
In the absence of cooperation from this producer, and thus of precise data concerning its activity, it is estimated, based on information from cooperating Community producers, that this manufacturer's production is around 10 % to 15 % of that of the Community industry.
Ker ta proizvajalec ni sodeloval in torej ni predložil natančnih podatkov v zvezi s svojo dejavnostjo, se na podlagi informacij sodelujočih proizvajalcev Skupnosti ocenjuje, da njegova proizvodnja predstavlja 10 % do 15 % proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti.
Should anti-dumping measures be imposed, the same type of developments, as set out in recitals 149 and 150 for the Community industry, can be expected for this other Community producer as well.
Če bodo uvedeni protidampinški ukrepi, se lahko tudi za tega drugega proizvajalca Skupnosti pričakuje enak pozitivni razvoj, kakor je za industrijo Skupnosti navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 149 in 150.
Two independent importers of the product concerned cooperated in the proceeding by completing and submitting questionnaires.
Dva neodvisna uvoznika zadevnega izdelka sta sodelovala v postopku, tako da sta izpolnila in predložila vprašalnik.
These importers expressed concern, should measures be imposed, regarding (i) the negative impact on the supply situation within the Community, given that the total production capacity within the Community amounted to only approximately one third of the consumption, and (ii) the adverse effect any measures would have on the cost of the product concerned, which, as a fundamental raw material for the production of steel, would affect overall Community steel production.
Navedena uvoznika sta izrazila zaskrbljenost, če bi bili ti ukrepi uvedeni, v zvezi z (i) negativnim vplivom na stanje zalog znotraj Skupnosti, glede na to, da je skupna proizvodna zmogljivost znotraj Skupnosti znašala približno eno tretjino potrošnje, in (ii) škodljivim učinkom, ki bi ga imel kakršen koli ukrep na strošek zadevnega izdelka, ki bi kot osnovna surovina za proizvodnjo jekla vplival na celotno proizvodnjo jekla Skupnosti.
As concerns the supply situation within the Community, it is true that consumption is around three times the current Community production capacity and that the Community industry only supplied around 25 % of Community demand during the IP.
Kar zadeva stanje zalog znotraj Skupnosti, je res, da je potrošnja približno trikrat tolikšna, kot je trenutna proizvodna zmogljivost Skupnosti, in da je industrija Skupnosti v OP pokrila samo okoli 25 % povpraševanja Skupnosti.
However, the Community industry was operating at around 70 % capacity utilisation during the IP, and at between 70 % and 80 % capacity utilisation over the period considered.
Vendar je industrija Skupnosti v OP delovala s približno 70 % izkoriščenostjo zmogljivosti, v obravnavanem obdobju pa z od 70 % do 80 % izkoriščenostjo zmogljivosti.
It is therefore in a position to significantly increase its current production.
Zato lahko znatno poveča svojo trenutno proizvodnjo.
Also, given the relatively limited quantities of imports which will be subject to measures (as indicated at recitals 149 and 150 above) and that the possible reduction of imports from the countries concerned could be compensated by exports from other countries, it is considered that the imposition of duties would not have any sizeable impact on the availability of supplies for importers.
Prav tako je glede na sorazmerno omejene količine uvoza, za katere bodo veljali ukrepi (kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 149 in 150 zgoraj), in glede na to, da bi se morebitno zmanjšanje uvoza iz zadevnih držav lahko nadomestilo z izvozom iz drugih držav, ugotovljeno, da uvedba dajatev ne bi imela večjega učinka na razpoložljivost ponudbe za uvoznike.
Also, in addition to supplies from Community producers and from the countries concerned by the investigation, the Community market is also supplied, to the extent of almost 40 % of consumption, by imports from other countries, notably Norway, India, South Africa and Brazil.
Poleg ponudbe proizvajalcev Skupnosti in držav, ki jih preiskava zadeva, 40 % potrošnje trga Skupnosti pokriva tudi uvoz iz drugih držav, zlasti Norveške, Južne Afrike in Brazilije.
Those countries have cumulatively in the past supplied higher quantities to the Community.
Te države so v preteklosti Skupnosti kumulativno dobavile velike količine.
It is recognised that if measures were introduced, there may be some short-term disruption due to possible delays with increasing Community production and if it proves necessary for some users to arrange new or alternative supplies.
Priznava se, da bi v primeru uvedbe ukrepov lahko prišlo do kratkoročne motnje zaradi morebitnih zamud pri povečanju proizvodnje Skupnosti, in če se izkaže, da bi si morali nekateri uporabniki priskrbeti nove ali nadomestne zaloge.