natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It argued further that since gas is largely available in Russia but not in the Community, domestic prices in Russia would be naturally lower than the price of the exported gas, which should have been taken into account when determining the adjustment to the gas prices paid on the domestic market.
Poleg tega je vložnik trdil, da so domače cene v Rusiji zaradi velike razpoložljivosti plina v Rusiji in majhne razpoložljivosti v Skupnosti logično nižje od cen izvoženega plina, kar pa bi se moralo upoštevati pri določitvi prilagoditve cen plina, plačanih na domačem trgu.
Moreover, the applicant, who has the burden proof, was not able to submit any further information or evidence which showed whether and to what extend distribution cost were indeed included in the Waidhaus price.
Poleg tega vložnik, ki nosi dokazno breme, ni uspel predložiti nobenih dodatnih informacij ali dokazov, ki bi pokazali, ali in v kakšnem obsegu so bili stroški distribucije dejansko vključeni v ceno pri Waidhausu.
However, the Community Institutions also considered that the impact on the calculation of the dumping margin of this specific adjustment may be significant.
Vendar so institucije Skupnosti tudi menile, da bi lahko ta posebna prilagoditev znatno vplivala na izračun stopnje dampinga.
Therefore, given the particular situation described in recital 37, it was considered that if the applicant supplies sufficient verifiable evidence, the Commission may consider the re-opening of the investigation in this regard.
Glede na posebno situacijo, opisano v uvodni izjavi (37), se je zato štelo, da Komisija v zvezi s tem lahko razmisli o ponovnem začetku pregleda, če vložnik predloži zadostne preverljive dokaze.
As far as the claimed comparative advantages are concerned regarding the availability of natural gas in Russia, it should be noted that as mentioned in recital 28, the primary criterion for the choice of Waidhaus prices as a basis on which to establish the gas prices is that they reasonably reflect a price normally payable in undistorted markets.
Kar zadeva navedene naravne primerjalne prednosti v zvezi z dostopnostjo zemeljskega plina v Rusiji, je treba opozoriti tudi, da je, kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi (28), prvo merilo za izbiro cen pri Waidhausu kot osnove, na kateri se določijo cene plina, da te ustrezno odražajo ceno, ki se običajno plačuje na neizkrivljenih trgih.
SG&A costs and profit could not be established on the basis of the chapeau of Article 2(6), first sentence, of the basic Regulation because, after the adjustment for the gas cost mentioned in recital 22, the applicant did not have representative domestic sales of the product concerned in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
PSA-stroškov in dobička ni bilo mogoče določiti na podlagi prvega stavka uvoda člena 2(6),osnovne uredbe, saj po prilagoditvi za strošek plina iz uvodne izjave (22) vložnik ni imel reprezentativne domače prodaje zadevnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
Article 2(6)(b) was not applicable either, since for products belonging to the same general category of goods natural gas is likewise the by far most important raw material and therefore manufacturing costs would very likely also need to be adjusted, for the reasons indicated in recital 21.
Prav tako ni bilo mogoče uporabiti člena 2(6)(b), saj je za izdelke, ki spadajo v isto splošno kategorijo blaga, zemeljski plin daleč najpomembnejša surovina, zaradi česar bi bilo zelo verjetno treba prilagoditi tudi stroške proizvodnje, iz razlogov v zgornji uvodni izjavi (21).
In the framework of this interim review, no information was available to properly quantify such adjustment and to establish SG&A costs and the relevant profit margins when selling these products after such adjustment.
V okviru tega vmesnega pregleda ni bilo na voljo informacij za ustrezno kvantifikacijo takšne prilagoditve in za določitev PSA-stroškov in zadevnih stopenj dobička pri prodaji izdelkov po takšni prilagoditvi.
Therefore, SG&A costs and profit were established pursuant to Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation on the basis of a reasonable method.
Zato so bili PSA-stroški in dobiček določeni v skladu s členom 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe na podlagi ustrezne metode.
It was found that the corresponding data from North American (USA and Canada) producers would be the most appropriate for the purpose of the investigation, given the large availability of reliable and complete public financial information from listed companies in this region of the world.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da bi bili podatki severnoameriških (ZDA in Kanada) proizvajalcev najustreznejši za namene te preiskave glede na veliko dostopnost zanesljivih in popolnoma javnih finančnih informacij družb, ki kotirajo na borzi v tem delu sveta.
Therefore, SG&A costs and profit were established on the basis of the weighted average of SG&A costs and profit from three North American producers, which were found to be amongst the largest companies in the fertilisers sector, with regard to their North American sales of the same general category of products (nitrogen fertilisers).
Zato so bili PSA-stroški in dobiček določeni na podlagi tehtanega povprečja PSA-stroškov in dobička treh severnoameriških proizvajalcev, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da so glede na njihovo domačo prodajo iste splošne kategorije izdelkov (dušikova gnojila) med največjimi proizvajalci v sektorju gnojil.
These three producers were considered to be representative of the nitrogen fertilisers business (on average over 78,15 % of the turnover of the company/business segment) and their SG&A costs and profit as representative of the same type of costs normally incurred by companies operating successfully in that business segment.
Ti trije proizvajalci so se šteli za reprezentativne na področju poslovanja z dušikovimi gnojili (povprečno več kot 78,15 % prometa družbe/poslovnega področja), njihovi PSA-stroški in dobiček pa za reprezentativne običajne stroške in dobiček družb, ki so na tem poslovnem področju uspešne.
Furthermore, there is no indication suggesting that the amount for profit so established exceeds the profit normally realised by Russian producers on sales of products of the same general category on their domestic market.
Poleg tega ni znakov, ki bi kazali na to, da znesek tako določenega dobička presega dobiček, ki ga običajno ustvarijo ruski proizvajalci pri prodaji izdelkov iste splošne kategorije na svojem domačem trgu.
As mentioned in recital 13, the applicant did not have export sales of UAN to the European Community during the RIP.
Kot je navedeno v zgornji uvodni izjavi (13), vložnik med OPP v Evropsko skupnost ni izvažal SAN.
Therefore, for the reasons set out in recitals 14 to 17 it was considered appropriate to examine the pricing behaviour of the applicant to other export markets in order to calculate the dumping margin.
Zato se je zaradi razlogov, navedenih v uvodnih izjavah (14) do (17), štelo za primerno, da se za izračun stopnje dampinga preveri vložnikova cenovna politika na drugih izvoznih trgih.
In the notice of initiation, the USA was envisaged as an appropriate market for comparison purposes, being the applicants major export market representing over 70 % of the applicants export quantities during the RIP.
V obvestilu o začetku so bile ZDA označene kot ustrezen trg za namene primerjave, saj so vložnikov velik izvozni trg, na katerega je vložnik med OPP izvozil več kot 70 % izvoznih količin.
None of the interested parties commented on the choice of the USA as the most appropriate market for comparison purposes.
Nobena izmed zainteresiranih strank ni podala pripomb glede izbire ZDA kot najustreznejšega trga za namene primerjave.
The investigation confirmed that the USA market for UAN is the most appropriate for the purpose of comparison since the European Community and the USA represent the two major UAN markets in the world, which are comparable both in terms of volume and prices.
Preiskava je potrdila, da je trg ZDA za SAN najustreznejši za namen primerjave, saj sta Evropska skupnost in ZDA dva največja trga za SAN na svetu, ki sta primerljiva tako po obsegu kot tudi po cenah.
Since export sales of the applicant to the USA during the RIP were made via a related trader located in Switzerland, the export price had to be established in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Ker je vložnikov izvoz v ZDA med OPP potekal preko povezanega trgovca v Švici, je bilo treba izvozno ceno določiti v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
Thus, the export price was constructed on the basis of prices actually paid or payable to the applicant by the first independent customer in the USA, its major export market.
Tako je bila izvozna cena konstruirana na podlagi cen, ki jih je vložniku dejansko plačala ali jih plačuje prva neodvisna stranka v ZDA, torej na vložnikovem najpomembnejšem izvoznem trgu.
A notional commission corresponding to the mark-up of the related trader, which can be considered similar to the role of an agent acting on a commission basis was deducted from these prices.
Od teh cen je bila odšteta fiktivna provizija, ki ustreza pribitku povezanega trgovca, ki ga je mogoče označiti kot posrednika, ki dela za provizijo.
This comparison showed a dumping margin of 33,95 %, expressed as a percentage of the cif North American frontier price, duty unpaid.
Ta primerjava je pokazala, da je stopnja dampinga 33,95 %, izražena kot odstotek cene CIF meja Severne Amerike, brez plačane dajatve.
Lasting nature of the circumstances prevailing during the RIP
Trajna narava okoliščin, ki so prevladovale med OP
In accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether the circumstances on the basis of which the current dumping margin was based have changed and whether such change was of a lasting nature.
V skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe je bil predmet preiskave ta, ali so se okoliščine, na katerih je temeljila veljavna stopnja dampinga, spremenile in ali je ta sprememba trajna.
There were no indications that the level of the normal value or the export price established for the applicant in the current investigation could not be considered of a lasting nature.
Ni bilo znakov, da stopnje normalne vrednosti ali izvozne cene, določene za vložnika, v sedanji preiskavi ne bi bilo mogoče šteti kot trajne.
Although it could be argued that the evolution of the prices of natural gas as the main raw material could have a significant influence on the normal value, it was considered that the effect of a price increase would affect all actors on the market and therefore have an impact on both the normal value and the export price.
Čeprav bi bilo mogoče trditi, da bi razvoj cen zemeljskega plina kot najpomembnejše surovine znatno vplival na normalno vrednost, se je štelo, da bi učinek zvišanja cen vplival na vse akterje na trgu ter s tem na normalno vrednost in izvozno ceno.
The export price of the applicant to the United States of America, the applicant’s major export market, during the RIP was found to be similar to that of its exports to other countries.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bila v OPP vložnikova izvozna cena v Združene države Amerike, ki so njegov glavni izvozni trg, podobna kot izvozna cena v druge države.
Therefore, there are reasons to consider that the dumping margin found is based on changed circumstances of a lasting nature.
Zato ni razloga, da bi se štelo, da ugotovljena stopnja dampinga temelji na spremenjenih okoliščinah trajne narave.
In addition, the present review did not reveal any indication or evidence that the basis on which the injury elimination level was established during the original investigation will significantly change in the foreseeable future.
Na podlagi sedanjega pregleda ni znakov ali dokazov o tem, da se bo podlaga, na kateri je bila med prvotno preiskavo določena stopnja odprave škode, v bližnji prihodnosti spremenila.
In this regard, it is noted that although the circumstances on the basis of which the determination of dumping was based have changed since the imposition of the definitive duties, which resulted in a higher dumping margin during the RIP as compared to the original IP, and although there are reasons to consider that the dumping margin found is based on changed circumstances of a lasting nature, the level of the anti-dumping duty in force should remain the same.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da mora raven veljavne protidampinške dajatve ostati enaka, čeprav so se okoliščine, na katerih je temeljila določitev dampinga, od uvedbe dokončnih dajatev spremenile, posledica česar je bila višja stopnja dampinga med OPP v primerjavi s prvotnim OP, in čeprav obstajajo razlogi, da se šteje, da ugotovljena stopnja dampinga temelji na spremenjenih okoliščinah trajne narave.
Indeed, as mentioned in recitals 55 and 56, the definitive anti-dumping duties were imposed at the level of the injury elimination level as found during the original investigation.
Kot je omenjeno v spodnjih uvodnih izjavah (55) in (56), so bile dokončne protidampinške dajatve dejansko uvedene na ravni stopnje odprave škode, ugotovljene med prvotno preiskavo.
It is recalled that, in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation and as outlined in recital 49 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1995/2000, the definitive duty in the original investigation was established at the level of the injury margin found, which was lower than the dumping margin because it was found that such lesser duty would be adequate to remove the injury to the Community industry.
Spomniti je treba, da je bila v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe in kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (49) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1995/2000, dokončna dajatev v prvotni preiskavi določena v višini ugotovljene stopnje škode, ki je bila nižja od stopnje dampinga, saj je bilo ugotovljeno, da bi bila takšna nižja dajatev ustrezna za odpravo škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
In the light of the foregoing, the duty established in this review should not be higher than the injury margin established in the original investigation.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega dajatev, določena v tem pregledu, ne sme biti višja od stopnje škode, določene v prvotni preiskavi.
No individual injury margin can be established in this partial interim review, since it is limited to the examination of dumping as far as the applicant is concerned.
V tem delnem vmesnem pregledu ni mogoče določiti posameznih stopenj škode, saj je omejen na pregled dampinga, kolikor ta zadeva vložnika.
Therefore, the dumping margin established in the present review was compared to the injury margin as established in the original investigation.
Zato je bila stopnja dampinga, določena v sedanjem pregledu, primerjana s stopnjo škode, določene v prvotni preiskavi.
Since the latter was lower than the dumping margin found in the present investigation, this review should be terminated without amending the anti-dumping measures in force.
Ker je bila stopnja škode nižja od stopnje dampinga, ugotovljene v sedanji preiskavi, je treba ta pregled zaključiti brez sprememb veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov.
The applicant expressed an interest in offering an undertaking but failed to submit a sufficiently substantiated undertaking offer within the deadlines set in Article 8(2) of the basic Regulation.
Vložnik je izrazil interes, da ponudi zavezo, vendar ni predložil dovolj utemeljene ponudbe za zavezo v rokih, določenih v členu 8(2) osnovne uredbe.
Consequently, no undertaking offer could be accepted by the Commission.
Zato Komisija ne more sprejeti nobene ponudbe za zavezo.
However, it is considered that the complexity of several issues, namely (1) the volatility of the price of the product concerned which would require some form of indexation of minimum prices, while at the same time the volatility is not sufficiently explained by the key cost driver; and (2) the particular market situation for the product concerned (inter alia, that there were no imports from the exporter subject to this review during the RIP) points to the need to further consider whether an undertaking combining an indexed minimum price and a quantitative ceiling would be workable.
Vendar se šteje, da zapletenost nekaterih vprašanj, in sicer (1) nestanovitnosti cene zadevnega izdelka, ki bi zahtevala določeno indeksacijo minimalnih cen, pri čemer pa ključno gonilo stroškov nestanovitnosti ne pojasnjuje v zadostni meri in (2) posebne razmere na trgu za zadevni izdelek (med drugim, da v OPP ni bilo uvoza izvoznika, ki je predmet tega pregleda), nakazuje potrebo po nadaljnjem obravnavanju, ali bi bila zaveza v kombinaciji indeksirane minimalne cene in kvantitativne zgornje meje učinkovita.
As mentioned above, due to this complexity, the applicant could not formulate an acceptable undertaking offer within the statutory deadline.
Kot je omenjeno zgoraj, zaradi te zapletenosti vložnik ni mogel oblikovati sprejemljive ponudbe za zavezo v določenem roku.
In view of the above, the Council considers that the applicant should exceptionally be allowed to complete its undertaking offer beyond the abovementioned deadline but within 10 calendar days from entry into force of this regulation.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega Svet meni, da je treba vložniku izjemoma dovoliti izpolnitev ponudbe za zavezo po zgoraj omenjenem roku, vendar v roku 10 koledarskih dni od začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
The partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of mixtures of urea and ammonium nitrate in aqueous or ammoniacal solution originating in Russia, currently classifiable within CN code 31028000, initiated pursuant to Article 11(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96, is hereby terminated without amending the measures in force.
Delni vmesni pregled protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz mešanic sečnine in amonijevega nitrata v vodni ali amoniakalni raztopini s poreklom iz Rusije, trenutno uvrščenih pod oznako KN 31028000, ki je bil sprožen v skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96, se zaključi brez spremembe veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1675/2003 (OJ L 238, 25.9.2003, p. 4).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1675/2003 (UL L 238, 25.9.2003, str. 4).
Council Regulation (EC) No 239/2008
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 239/2008
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of coke of coal in pieces with a diameter of more than 80 mm (Coke 80+) originating in the People’s Republic of China
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in o dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, naložene za uvoz koksa iz premoga v kosih s premerom nad 80 mm (koks 80+) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation) and in particular Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“) in zlasti člena 9 Uredbe,
On 20 December 2006, the Commission published a notice [2] initiating an anti-dumping proceeding on imports into the Community of coke of coal in pieces with a diameter of more than 80 mm (Coke 80+) originating in the People’s Republic of China (the PRC).
Komisija je 20. decembra 2006 objavila obvestilo [2] o začetku protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom v Skupnost koksa iz premoga v kosih s premerom nad 80 mm (koks 80+) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“).
On 19 September 2007, the Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 1071/2007 [3] (the provisional Regulation) imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of Coke 80+ originating in the PRC.
Komisija je 19. septembra 2007 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1071/2007 [3] („začasna uredba“) za uvoz koksa 80+ s poreklom iz LRK uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev.
It is noted that the proceeding was initiated following a complaint lodged by three Community producers, representing around 40 % of the total Community production of Coke 80+.
Ugotovi se, da je bil postopek sprožen po pritožbi treh proizvajalcev Skupnosti, ki predstavljajo okoli 40 % vse proizvodnje koksa 80+ v Skupnosti.
It is noted that an understated figure of ‘more than 30 %’ was mentioned in recital 2 of the provisional Regulation; however, following further investigation it was found that the complainants in fact represented around 40 % of the total Community production.
Ugotovi se, da je bil v uvodni izjavi 2 začasne uredbe naveden podcenjen podatek „več kot 30 %“; po nadaljnji preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da pritožniki dejansko predstavljajo okoli 40 % celotne proizvodnje Skupnosti.
As set out in recital 12 of the provisional Regulation, the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 October 2005 to 30 September 2006 (investigation period or IP).
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 12 začasne uredbe, je preiskava dampinga in škode zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2005 do 30. septembra 2006 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
With respect to the trends relevant for the injury assessment, the Commission analysed data covering the period from 1 January 2003 to the end of the IP (period considered).
V zvezi z gibanji, pomembnimi za oceno škode, je Komisija analizirala podatke za obdobje od 1. januarja 2003 do konca OP („obravnavano obdobje“).
Following the imposition of provisional anti-dumping duties on imports of Coke 80+ originating in the PRC, several interested parties submitted comments in writing.
Po uvedbi začasnih protidampinških dajatev za uvoz koksa 80+ s poreklom iz LRK je več zainteresiranih strank predložilo pisne pripombe.
The parties who so requested were also granted the opportunity to be heard.
Stranke, ki so to zahtevale, so prav tako lahko izrazile svoja mnenja.
The Commission continued to seek and verify all information it deemed necessary for its definitive findings.
Komisija je še naprej iskala in preverjala vse informacije, za katere je menila, da so nujne za dokončne ugotovitve.
In particular, the Commission intensified the investigation with regard to Community interest aspects.
Komisija je zlasti okrepila preiskavo v zvezi z vidiki interesa Skupnosti.
In this connection, one additional verification visit was carried out after the imposition of the provisional measures at the following company:
V povezavi s tem je bil po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov izveden dodatni preveritveni obisk, in sicer pri naslednjem podjetju:
La Fonte Ardennaise, Vivier-Au-Court, France — user in the Community.
La Fonte Ardennaise, Vivier-Au-Court, Francija – uporabnik v Skupnosti.
In addition, an information-gathering visit was made to the European Foundry Association (CAEF) in Düsseldorf, Germany.
Poleg tega je bil izveden obisk za zbiranje informacij, in sicer pri Odboru združenj evropskih livarn (CAEF) v nemškem Düsseldorfu.
In order to clarify certain alleged implementation problems, a visit was also carried out to customs authorities in Antwerp, Belgium as well as in Duisburg, Germany.
Z namenom razjasnitve nekaterih domnevnih izvedbenih problemov je bil izveden tudi obisk carinskih organov v belgijskem Antwerpnu in nemškem Duisburgu.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of Coke 80+ originating in the PRC and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of the provisional duty.
Vse stranke so bile obveščene o glavnih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je bila načrtovana priporočitev uvedbe dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz koksa 80+ s poreklom iz LRK in dokončnega pobiranja zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo.
They were also granted a period within which they could make representations subsequent to this disclosure.
Strankam je bilo določeno tudi obdobje, v okviru katerega so lahko po tem razkritju podale svoje pripombe.