natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Generally, authors transfer copyrights of their works (publishing rights) to music publishers and receive from the latter payments of advances and a share of the royalties generated by the commercial exploitation of their works.
Avtorji ponavadi prenesejo avtorske pravice za svoja dela („založniške pravice“) na glasbene založnike, za kar od njih prejmejo predplačila in del avtorskih honorarjev, ki so se zbrali s komercialno izrabo njihovih del.
Music publishers exploit the rights received from authors by granting licences to right users.
Glasbeni založniki izrabljajo pravice, ki so jim jih predali avtorji, s tem da podeljujejo licence uporabnikom pravic.
The users pay royalties for the use of these musical works.
Uporabniki plačajo avtorske pravice za uporabo teh glasbenih del.
Depending on the specific types of rights, the licences are granted to right users either by the publishers directly or via collecting societies.
Glede na določeno vrsto pravic podeljujejo licence uporabnikom pravic neposredno založniki, ali pa kolektivne organizacije.
The market investigation to define the relevant product markets confirmed that as to the exploitation of music publishing rights, different categories of rights need to be distinguished, i.e. mechanical rights, performance rights, synchronisation rights, print rights and online rights.
Tržna raziskava glede opredelitve upoštevnih proizvodnih trgov je potrdila, da je treba glede izrabe pravic glasbenega založništva razlikovati med različnimi vrstami pravic, t. j. mehanskimi pravicami, pravicami izvajanja, sinhronizacijskimi pravicami, pravicami tiskanja in spletnimi pravicami.
These categories of rights apply to different forms of use of music, e.g. mechanical rights are needed for the recording of CDs; performance rights need to be acquired if music is played on the radio and in bars; synchronisation rights are needed if music is used in films; print rights allow the user to produce sheet music; and online rights are necessary in order to sell music via the Internet and mobile telephony.
Te vrste pravic veljajo za različne oblike uporabe glasbe, npr. mehanske pravice so potrebne za snemanje zgoščenk; pravice izvajanja je treba pridobiti za predvajanje glasbe na radiu ali v lokalih; sinhronizacijske pravice so potrebne za uporabo glasbe v filmih; pravice tiskanja dovoljujejo uporabniku grafično izdelati glasbeno delo; spletne pravice pa so potrebne za prodajo glasbe prek interneta in mobilne telefonije.
These categories of rights therefore constitute separate markets.
Te vrste pravic zato sestavljajo ločene trge.
With respect to the provision of music publishing services to authors, the market investigation confirmed that no further distinction has to be made since the authors normally do not use different publishers for the categories of rights.
Glede zagotavljanja storitev izdajanja glasbenih zapisov za avtorje je tržna raziskava potrdila, da ni potrebe po dodatnem razlikovanju, saj avtorji ponavadi ne uporabljajo različnih založnikov za različne vrste pravic.
The market investigation showed that the geographic scope with respect to the market for the provision of music publishing services to authors, and the markets for the exploitation of performance, mechanical, synchronisation, print and online rights appear to be national.
Tržna raziskava je pokazala, da se zdi geografski obseg trga za zagotavljanje storitev izdajanja glasbenih zapisov za avtorje ter trgov za izrabo pravic izvajanja, mehanskih in sinhronizacijskih pravic, pravic tiskanja in spletnih pravic nacionalen.
For online rights it is likely that an EEA-wide market will develop in the future.
Za spletne pravice je verjetno, da se bo v prihodnosti razvil trg na celotnem EGP.
The exact geographic scope of all relevant product markets can be left open since the conclusions of the analysis are the same, irrespective of the geographic dimension of the markets.
Natančni geografski obseg upoštevnih proizvodnih trgov lahko ostane nedoločen, saj so končne ugotovitve analize enake, ne glede na geografsko razsežnost trgov.
The notified concentration affects the market for the provision of music publishing services to authors, and the markets for the exploitation of performance, mechanical, synchronisation, print and online rights in several countries in the EEA as well as on EEA-wide level.
Priglašena koncentracija zadeva trg zagotavljanja storitev izdajanja glasbenih zapisov za avtorje ter trge za izrabo pravic izvajanja, mehanskih, sinhronizacijskih pravic, pravic tiskanja ter spletnih pravic v več državah v EGP in tudi na celotnem EGP.
The market investigation has shown that the concentration does not lead to competition concerns in any of the affected markets except for those for online rights.
Tržna raziskava je pokazala, da koncentracija ne vodi v pomisleke glede konkurence na prizadetih trgih, razen pri trgih za izrabo spletnih pravic.
In the markets for the provision of music publishing services to authors the market investigation has shown that authors will continue to have a sufficient number of alternatives to the merged entity.
Na trgih za zagotavljanje storitev izdajanja glasbenih zapisov za avtorje je tržna raziskava pokazala, da bodo imeli avtorji še naprej dovolj veliko število drugih možnosti poleg združenega podjetja.
The merger, therefore, does not create competition concerns in any of the affected markets for music publishing services to authors.
Združitev torej ne ustvarja pomislekov glede konkurence v katerem koli od prizadetih trgov za storitve izdajanja glasbenih zapisov za avtorje.
With respect to the exploitation of music publishing rights the market investigation has shown that the merger is unlikely to create competition concerns in the markets for mechanical, performance, synchronisation and print rights.
Glede izrabe pravic glasbenega založništva je tržna raziskava pokazala, da ni verjetno, da bi združitev ustvarjala pomisleke glede konkurence na trgih za mehanske pravice, pravice izvajanja, sinhronizacijske pravice in pravice izdajanja.
In those markets, where collecting societies play a predominant role (mechanical and performance rights), the merger will not have a significant effect since the collecting societies take the pricing decisions and grant licences on a non-discriminatory basis to users.
Na trgih, kjer imajo združena podjetja prevladujočo vlogo (mehanske pravice in pravice izvajanja), združitev ne bo imela bistvenega vpliva, saj združena podjetja odločajo o cenah in podeljujejo licence uporabnikom na nediskriminatorni podlagi.
In the markets where the publishers administer the rights without the involvement of collecting societies (synchronisation and print rights), the market investigation confirmed that the customers will after the merger continue to have sufficient alternatives to the merged entity.
Na trgih, kjer založniki upravljajo pravice brez vključitve združenih podjetij (sinhronizacijske pravice in pravice tiskanja), je tržna raziskava potrdila, da bodo imeli kupci po združitvi še naprej dovolj drugih možnosti poleg združenega podjetja.
It is therefore unlikely that Universal will after the merger be able to increase prices for performance, mechanical, synchronisation and print rights.
Zato ni verjetno, da bo podjetje Universal po združitvi lahko zvišalo cene za pravice izvajanja, mehanske in sinhronizacijske pravice ter pravice tiskanja.
In the market for online rights, the publishers have recently started to withdraw their respective rights for Anglo-American repertoires from the traditional collecting societies system.
Na trgu za spletne pravice so založniki pred kratkim začeli umikati svoje pravice za anglo-ameriške repertoarje od tradicionalnega sistema združenih podjetij.
They have started to transfer their rights to selected collecting societies acting as agents for the individual publisher — a possibility which has been reaffirmed by a Commission Recommendation issued in 2005.
Začeli so prenašati svoje pravice na izbrana združena podjetja, ki delujejo kot predstavniki za posameznega založnika – možnost, ki je bila ponovno potrjena s priporočilom Komisije, izdanim v letu 2005.
The market investigation has shown that, following the withdrawal, the pricing power shifts from the collecting societies to the publishers.
Tržna raziskava je pokazala, da se je po preklicu moč oblikovanja cen premaknila od združenih podjetij na založnike.
In this new environment, Universal will after the merger be able to exert control over a large percentage of titles either via its (fully or partly-owned) copyrights in the authors’ works or via its rights in the individual recordings.
V tem novem okolju bo lahko podjetje Universal po združitvi izvajalo nadzor nad velikim odstotkom naslovov prek svojih avtorskih pravic (ki jih ima v celoti ali delno v lasti) v delih avtorjev, ali pa prek svojih posameznih snemanj.
In Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Poland, and the United Kingdom as well as on EEA-wide level, Universal would even control 50 % or more of the chart hits and thereby become a ‘must-have’ product for all online and mobile music services whose possibilities to circumvent Universal will be significantly reduced by the merger.
V Avstriji, Češki, Nemčiji, Poljski in Združenem kraljestvu ter na območju celotnega EGP bo podjetje Universal nadzorovalo celo 50 % ali več uspešnic na glasbenih lestvicah, zaradi česar bodo postali izdelek, ki ga morajo „nujno imeti“ vse spletne in mobilne glasbene storitve, ki se jim bodo možnosti, da se podjetju Universal izognejo, zaradi združitve bistveno zmanjšale.
The Commission had therefore concerns that the merger would give Universal the possibility and the incentive to increase prices for online rights in Anglo-American repertoire.
Komisija je zato imela pomisleke, da bo združitev omogočila podjetju Universal, da poviša cene za spletne pravice v anglo-ameriškem repertoarju.
It therefore can be concluded that the proposed concentration in its notified form would likely to lead to a significant impediment of effective competition in the market for online rights in Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Poland, and the United Kingdom as well as on EEA-wide level.
Zato se lahko sklepa, da bi lahko predlagana koncentracija in njena priglašena oblika bistveno ovirali učinkovito konkurenco na trgu za spletne pravice v Avstriji, Češki, Nemčiji, Poljski in Združenem kraljestvu ter na območju celotnega EGP.
In order to remove the Commission’s concerns, Universal committed to divest a number of important catalogues covering Anglo-American-copyrights and contracts with authors.
Da bi odpravilo pomisleke Komisije glede konkurence, se je podjetje Universal zavezalo k opustitvi številnih pomembnih katalogov, ki vključujejo anglo-ameriške avtorske pravice in pogodbe z avtorji.
These catalogues include the EEA-activities of Zomba UK, 19 Music, 19 Songs, BBC music publishing, Rondor UK as well as an EEA-licence for the catalogue of Zomba U.S.
Ti katalogi vključujejo dejavnosti EGP Zomba UK, 19 Music, 19 Songs, katalog glasbenega založništva BBC, Rondor UK, pa tudi licence EGP za kataloge Zomba U.S.
These catalogues contain many bestselling titles and several successful authors such as The Kaiser Chiefs, Justin Timberlake and R. Kelly.
Ti katalogi vsebujejo veliko naslovov, ki se zelo dobro prodajajo, in več uspešnih avtorjev, kot so The Kaiser Chiefs, Justin Timberlake in R. Kelly.
Even though the concerns only relate to online rights, for reasons of viability the commitments have to cover the complete copyrights (i.e. also mechanical, performance, synchronisation and print rights).
Čeprav se pomisleki nanašajo le na spletne pravice, morajo zaveze zaradi uporabnosti vključevati celotne avtorske pravice (t. j. tudi mehanske pravice, pravice izvajanja, sinhronizacijske pravice in pravice tiskanja).
The parties significantly improved the package of remedies twice responding to the results of two market tests.
Stranki sta dvakrat znatno izboljšali zaveze, v skladu z ugotovitvami dveh tržnih raziskav.
In the light of the quality of the finally proposed catalogues, the Commission concludes that the commitments remove the competition concerns.
Zaradi kakovosti končnih predlaganih katalogov Komisija sklepa, da so zaveze odpravile pomisleke glede konkurence.
It can therefore be concluded that, on the basis of the commitments submitted by the Parties, the notified concentration will not lead to a significant impediment of effective competition in the common market or in a substantial part of it on the market for online rights.
Zato se lahko sklepa, da na podlagi zavez, ki sta jih dali stranki, priglašena koncentracija ne bo velika ovira za učinkovitost konkurence na skupnem trgu ali na njegovem znatnem delu na trgu za spletne pravice.
Hence, the proposed concentration was to be declared compatible with the common market pursuant to Articles 8(2), 10(2) of the Merger Regulation and to Article 57 of the EEA Agreement.
Predlagana koncentracija se zato razglasi za združljivo z načeli skupnega trga v skladu s členoma 8(2), 10(2) Uredbe o združitvah in členom 57 Sporazuma EGP.
Universal is a subsidiary of Vivendi which is an international media company.
Podjetje Universal je hčerinsko podjetje podjetja Vivendi, ki je mednarodno medijsko podjetje.
Its worldwide activities include music recording and publishing.
Njegove dejavnosti po vsem svetu vključujejo snemanje in izdajanje glasbe.
concerning the non-inclusion of guazatine triacetate in Annex I, IA or IB to Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market
o nevključitvi guazatin triacetata v Prilogo I, IA ali IB k Direktivi 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dajanju biocidnih pripravkov v promet
(notified under document number C(2007) 3979)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 3979)
That list includes guazatine triacetate.
Navedeni seznam vključuje guazatin triacetat.
Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 2032/2003, guazatine triacetate has been evaluated in accordance with Article 11(2) of Directive 98/8/EC for use in product-type 8, wood preservatives, as defined in Annex V to Directive 98/8/EC.
Na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 2032/2003 je bila v skladu s členom 11(2) Direktive 98/8/ES opravljena presoja guazatin triacetata glede uporabe v 8. vrsti izdelkov, pripravkih za zaščito lesa, kot je opredeljena v Prilogi V k Direktivi 98/8/ES.
The United Kingdom was designated as Rapporteur Member State and submitted the competent authority report, together with a recommendation, to the Commission on 22 September 2006 in accordance with Article 10(5) and (7) of Regulation (EC) No 2032/2003.
Združeno kraljestvo, ki je bilo imenovano za državo članico poročevalko, je 22. septembra 2006 v skladu s členom 10(5) in (7) Uredbe (ES) št. 2032/2003 Komisiji poslalo poročilo pristojnega organa in priporočilo.
The competent authority report was reviewed by the Member States and the Commission.
Države članice in Komisija so pregledale poročilo pristojnega organa.
In accordance with Article 11(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2032/2003, the findings of the review were incorporated in an assessment report by the Standing Committee on Biocidal Products at its meeting of 16 March 2007.
V skladu s členom 11(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 2032/2003 je Stalni odbor za biocidne pripravke na svojem sestanku 16. marca 2007 vključil ugotovitve pregleda v poročilo o oceni.
In the absence of critical data on leaching from a treated surface, on reproductive effects of guazatine in Daphnia magna and on degradation rates in water-sediment systems and soil, it is not possible to include guazatine triacetate in Annex I, IA or IB to Directive 98/8/EC for product-type 8.
Ker ni bilo na voljo ključnih podatkov o spiranju z obdelanih površin, vplivih guazatina na reprodukcijo vodnih bolh Daphnia magna ter stopnjah razgradljivosti v vodno-sedimentnih sistemih in zemlji, guazatin triacetata ni mogoče vključiti v Prilogo I, IA ali IB k Direktivi 98/8/ES za 8. vrsto izdelkov.
In addition, the United Kingdom competent authority carried out an environmental risk assessment using a realistic worst-case approach, which showed unacceptable risks to the environment.
Poleg tega je pristojni organ Združenega kraljestva napravil oceno okoljskega tveganja na podlagi pristopa za realno najslabši možni primer, ki je pokazala nesprejemljiva tveganja za okolje.
The review of guazatine triacetate did not reveal any open questions or concerns to be addressed by the Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks.
Pregled guazatin triacetata ni pokazal nobenih odprtih vprašanj ali razlogov za zaskrbljenost, ki bi jih moral obravnavati Znanstveni odbor za zdravstvena in okoljska tveganja.
Guazatine triacetate (CAS number 115044-19-4) shall not be included in Annexes I, IA or IB to Directive 98/8/EC for product-type 8.
Guazatin triacetat (številka CAS 115044-19-4) se ne vključi v Prilogo I, IA ali IB k Direktivi 98/8/ES za 8. vrsto izdelkov.
For the purposes of the third subparagraph of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2032/2003, this Decision shall apply from the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Za namene tretjega pododstavka člena 4(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2032/2003 se ta odločba začne uporabljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2007/20/EC (OJ L 94, 4.4.2007, p. 23).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Komisije 2007/20/ES (UL L 94, 4.4.2007, str. 23).
of 28 August 2007
z dne 28. avgusta 2007
concerning measures to prevent the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza to other captive birds kept in zoos and approved bodies, institutes or centres in the Member States
o ukrepih za preprečevanje širjenja visoko patogene aviarne influence na druge ptice v živalskih vrtovih in odobrenih ustanovah, inštitutih ali središčih v državah članicah
(notified under document number C(2007) 3987)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 3987)
Having regard to Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992 laying down animal health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of animals, semen, ova and embryos not subject to animal health requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A(I) to Directive 90/425/EEC [1], and in particular the first paragraph of Article 22 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 92/65/EGS z dne 13. julija 1992 o zahtevah zdravstvenega varstva živali za trgovino in za uvoz v Skupnost živali, semena, jajčnih celic in zarodkov, za katere ne veljajo zahteve zdravstvenega varstva živali, določene v posebnih pravilih Skupnosti iz Priloge A(I) k Direktivi 90/425/EGS [1], in zlasti prvega odstavka člena 22 Direktive,
Having regard to Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC [2], and in particular Articles 56(3), 57(2) and 63(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2005/94/ES z dne 20. decembra 2005 o ukrepih Skupnosti za obvladovanje aviarne influence in razveljavitvi Direktive 92/40/EGS [2] ter zlasti členov 56(3), 57(2), in 63(3) Direktive,
Directive 2005/94/EC sets out certain preventive measures relating to the surveillance and the early detection of avian influenza and the minimum control measures to be applied in the event of an outbreak of that disease in poultry or other captive birds.
Direktiva 2006/94/ES določa nekatere preventivne ukrepe v zvezi z nadzorom in zgodnjim odkrivanjem aviarne influence ter minimalne ukrepe za obvladovanje, ki se morajo izvajati v primeru izbruha navedene bolezni pri perutnini ali drugih pticah v ujetništvu.
Directive 2005/94/EC also lays down rules for the introduction of preventive vaccination against avian influenza of poultry and other captive birds, such as other captive birds kept in zoos and approved bodies, institutes or centres, and provides for detailed rules thereof to be established by the Commission.
Direktiva 2005/94/ES tudi določa pravila za uvedbo preventivnega cepljenja proti aviarni influenci za perutnino in druge ptice v ujetništvu, na primer ptice v živalskih vrtovih in odobrenih ustanovah, inštitutih ali središčih, ter predvideva podrobna pravila za preventivno cepljenje, ki jih določi Komisija.
Commission Decision 2006/474/EC of 6 July 2006 concerning measures to prevent the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza caused by influenza A virus of subtype H5N1 to birds kept in zoos and approved bodies, institutes and centres in the Member States and repealing Decision 2005/744/EC [3] lays down rules to prevent the spread of avian influenza caused by highly pathogenic influenza A virus of subtype H5N1 from birds living in the wild to birds kept in zoos and approved bodies, institutes or centres.
Odločba Komisije 2006/474/ES z dne 6. julija 2006 o ukrepih za preprečevanje širjenja visoko patogene aviarne influence, ki jo povzroča virus influence A podtipa H5N1, na ptice v živalskih vrtovih in odobrenih ustanovah, inštitutih ali središčih v državah članicah ter o razveljavitvi Odločbe 2005/744/ES [3] določa pravila za preprečitev širjenja aviarne influence, ki jo povzroča visoko patogeni virus influence A podtipa H5N1, s ptic, ki živijo v divjini, na ptice v živalskih vrtovih in odobrenih ustanovah, inštitutih ali središčih.
It also lays down rules for the vaccination of birds kept in zoos and approved bodies, institutes or centres and provides for detailed rules for the submission by the Member States to the Commission of their vaccination plans.
Prav tako določa pravila za cepljenje ptic v živalskih vrtovih in odobrenih ustanovah, inštitutih ali središčih in tudi podrobna pravila, v skladu s katerimi države članice Komisiji predložijo svoje načrte cepljenja.
For the purposes of such preventive vaccination, only vaccines authorised in accordance with Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products [4] or Regulation No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency [5] should be used.
Za namen takega preventivnega cepljenja se uporabljajo le cepiva, odobrena na podlagi Direktive 2001/82/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. novembra 2001 o zakoniku Skupnosti o zdravilih za uporabo v veterinarski medicini [4] ali Uredbe (ES) št. 726/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o postopkih Skupnosti za pridobitev dovoljenja za promet in nadzor zdravil za humano in veterinarsko uporabo ter o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za zdravila [5].
Council Directive 1999/22/EC of 29 March 1999 relating to the keeping of wild animals in zoos [6] defines zoos which are covered by that Directive.
Direktiva Sveta 1999/22/ES z dne 29. marca 1999 o zadrževanju prosto živečih živali v živalskih vrtovih [6] določa živalske vrtove, ki jih zajema navedena direktiva.
In the interests of consistency of Community legislation, that definition should be taken into account for the purposes of this Decision.
Zaradi skladnosti zakonodaje Skupnosti je treba navedeno opredelitev upoštevati za namene te odločbe.
Pursuant to Decision 2006/474/EC, the Commission has approved 17 preventive vaccination plans against avian influenza for birds kept in zoos submitted by Member States.
V skladu z Odločbo 2006/474/ES je Komisija odobrila 17 načrtov preventivnega cepljenja proti aviarni influenci za ptice v živalskih vrtovih, ki so jih predložile države članice.
Vaccination plans have been implemented by 14 Member States.
Načrte cepljenja je izvajalo 14 držav članic.
In general no adverse reactions in almost 45000 vaccinated birds have been observed and most bird species have produced a significant immune response following two administrations of the vaccines.
Na splošno pri 45000 cepljenih pticah ni bilo opaženih škodljivih reakcij in pri večini vrst ptic je bil po dveh odmerkih uporabljenega cepiva viden znaten imunski odziv.