natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Replies were received from the five complainant Community producers, one Community producer who supported the complaint and cooperated fully, seven unrelated importers, three raw material suppliers, eight users, and one association of users.
Komisija je prejela odgovore petih pritožnikov proizvajalcev iz Skupnosti, enega proizvajalca iz Skupnosti, ki je podprl pritožbo in v celoti sodeloval, sedmih nepovezanih uvoznikov, treh proizvajalcev surovin, osmih uporabnikov in enega združenja uporabnikov.
With regard to the countries concerned by this investigation the Commission received replies from three exporters in the PRC, two exporters in Egypt, one exporter in Kazakhstan, one exporter in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and two exporters in Russia.
V zvezi z državami, ki jih zadeva ta preiskava, je Komisija prejela odgovore treh izvoznikov v LRK, dveh izvoznikov v Egiptu, enega izvoznika v Kazahstanu, enega izvoznika v Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji in dveh izvoznikov v Rusiji.
The Kazakh exporter subsequently did not allow an on-the-spot verification of its MET claim and questionnaire reply.
Kazahstanski izvoznik nato ni dovolil preveritve zahtevka za TGO in izpolnjenega vprašalnika na kraju samem.
Due to this non-cooperation in the meaning of Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation, its data could not be verified and had to be disregarded.
Zaradi tega nesodelovanja v smislu člena 18(1) osnovne uredbe se njegovih podatkov ni dalo preveriti in zato niso bili upoštevani.
The company was informed accordingly.
Družba je bila o tem obveščena.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for a provisional determination of dumping, resulting injury and Community interest.
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za začasno ugotovitev dampinga, škode, ki je zaradi tega nastala, in interesa Skupnosti.
Producers located in the Community:
proizvajalci v Skupnosti:
Ferroatlantica, Cee, Dumbria and Madrid, Spain
Ferroatlantica, Cee, Dumbria in Madrid, Španija
Ferropem, Laudun and Chambéry, France
Ferropem, Laudun in Chambéry, Francija
Vargön Alloys, Vargön, Sweden
Vargön Alloys, Vargön, Švedska
OFZ, Istebné, Slovakia
OFZ, Istebné, Slovaška
Huta Laziska, Laziska Gorne, Poland
Huta Laziska, Laziska Gorne, Poljska
TDR Metalurgija, Ruse, Slovenia.
TDR Metalurgija, Ruše, Slovenija;
Community user:
uporabnik Skupnosti:
Thyssen Krupp Steel AG, Germany.
Thyssen Krupp Steel AG, Nemčija;
Exporting producers and related companies in the exporting countries:
proizvajalci izvozniki in povezane družbe v državah izvoznicah:
Lanzhou Good Land Ferroalloy Factory Co., Ltd, Xicha Town, and Rich Trading Co. Ltd. (related exporter), Lanzhou City,
Lanzhou Good Land Ferroalloy Factory Co., Ltd, Xicha Town, in Rich Trading Co. Ltd (povezani izvoznik), Lanzhou City
Erdos Xijin Kuangye Co., Ltd, Qipanjing Town, and Inner Mongolia Erdos International Trade Co., Ltd (related exporter), Dangshen Town.
Erdos Xijin Kuangye Co., Ltd, Qipanjing Town, in Inner Mongolia Erdos International Trade Co., Ltd (povezani izvoznik), Dangshen Town
The Egyptian Ferroalloys Company, Cairo,
The Egyptian Ferroalloys Company, Kairo
Egyptian Chemical Industries KIMA, Cairo and Aswan.
Egyptian Chemical Industries KIMA, Kairo in Aswan
Chemk Group (Chelyabinsk Electrometallurgical Integrated Plant and Kuznetsk Ferroalloy Works), Novokuznetsk,
Chemk Group (Chelyabinsk Electrometallurgical Integrated Plant in Kuznetsk Ferroalloy Works), Novokuznetsk
ICT Group of Companies (Bratsk Ferroalloy Plant and its related trading companies: TD North West Ferro Alloy Company and Bakersfield Marketing Ltd), Bratsk and Saint Petersburg.
ICT Group of Companies (Bratsk Ferroalloy Plant in njene povezane trgovinske družbe: TD North West Ferro Alloy Company in Bakersfield Marketing Ltd), Bratsk in Sankt Peterburg;
Related importer in the Community:
povezani uvoznik v Skupnosti
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 October 2005 to 30 September 2006 (IP).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2005 do 30. septembra 2006 (OP).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from January 2003 to the end of the IP (period considered).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajela obdobje od januarja 2003 do konca OP (obravnavano obdobje).
FeSi is a ferro-alloy containing by weight more than 8 % and less than 95 % silicon and at least 4 % iron.
Fero-silicij je fero zlitina, ki vsebuje po teži več kot 8 % in manj kot 95 % silicija in vsaj 4 % železa.
Production of FeSi takes place in electric arc furnaces by means of reducing quartz using carbon-bearing products.
Fero-silicij se proizvaja v elektroobločnih pečeh z redukcijo kremena s pomočjo izdelkov, ki vsebujejo ogljik.
The product is essentially used as a deoxidiser and as an alloying component in the iron and steel industry.
Izdelek se uporablja predvsem kot dezoksidant in zlitinski element v železarski in jeklarski industriji.
FeSi is sold in the form of lumps, grains or powder and exists in various qualities depending on the silicon and the impurity content (e.g. aluminium).
Fero-silicij se prodaja v obliki grudic, zrn ali prahu in v različnih količinah glede na vsebnost silicija in nečistoč (npr. aluminija).
FeSi with a silicon content of 70 % and higher was considered as high purity, with a silicon content of more than 55 % and less than 70 % as medium purity, and with a silicon content of less than 55 % as low purity FeSi.
Fero-silicij z vsebnostjo silicija 70 % in več je veljal za fero-silicij z visoko stopnjo čistosti, z vsebnostjo silicija več kot 55 % in manj kot 70 % s srednjo stopnjo čistosti ter z vsebnostjo silicija manj kot 55 % z nizko stopnjo čistosti.
FeSi exported to the EC and originating in the PRC, Egypt, Kazakhstan, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Russia (the product concerned) is normally declared within CN codes 72022100, 72022910 and 72022990.
Fero-silicij, izvožen v ES in s poreklom iz LRK, Egipta, Kazahstana, Nekdanje jugoslovanske republike Makedonije in Rusije („zadevni izdelek“), je običajno uvrščen pod oznake KN 72022100, 72022910 in 72022990.
In the course of the investigation it was alleged by several exporters that slag, which often contains significantly less then 45 % silicon, should be excluded from the scope of the investigation, because of an alleged lack of the same basic physical characteristic and the same basic uses.
Med preiskavo so številni izvozniki trdili, da bi bilo treba žlindro, ki pogosto vsebuje precej manj kot 45 % silicija, zaradi domnevnega pomanjkanja enakih osnovnih fizikalnih lastnosti in enake osnovne uporabe izločiti iz obsega preiskave.
However, this issue needs to be clarified further.
Vendar pa je to vprašanje treba dodatno pojasniti.
In this context interested parties are invited to submit information as to whether the basic physical characteristics and usages of low purity FeSi (i.e. slag) differ substantially from other types of FeSi and to which extent the exclusion of slag could significantly increase the risk of circumvention of measures.
V zvezi s tem se zainteresirane stranke poziva, da predložijo podatke glede tega, ali se osnovne fizikalne lastnosti in uporaba fero-silicija z nizko stopnjo čistosti (tj. žlindre) znatno razlikujejo od drugih vrst fero-silicija in v kolikšni meri bi izločitev žlindre znatno povečala tveganje izogibanja ukrepom.
However, on the basis of information received so far, it is provisionally determined that low purity FeSi should be considered as product concerned.
Vendar pa je na podlagi do zdaj prejetih informacij začasno določeno, da se fero-silicij z nizko stopnjo čistosti obravnava kot zadevni izdelek.
No differences were found between the product concerned and the FeSi produced and sold on the domestic market in the countries concerned, to the extent domestic sales were verified, and in Norway, which served as an analogue country for the purpose of establishing the normal value with respect to imports from the PRC and Kazakhstan.
Med zadevnim izdelkom in fero-silicijem, proizvedenim in prodajanim na domačem trgu zadevnih držav (v obsegu, v katerem so bile domače prodaje proučene) in na Norveškem, ki je v namen določitve normalne vrednosti glede na uvoz iz LRK in Kazahstana predstavljala primerljivo državo, ni bilo ugotovljenih razlik.
Indeed, FeSi has the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and uses compared with that exported from the countries concerned to the Community.
Fero-silicij ima dejansko enake osnovne fizikalne in kemijske lastnosti ter uporabo v primerjavi s fero-silicijem, ki je bil izvožen iz zadevnih držav v Skupnost.
Likewise, no differences were found between the product concerned and the FeSi produced by the Community industry and sold on the Community market.
Prav tako niso bile ugotovljene razlike med zadevnim izdelkom in fero-silicijem, ki ga proizvaja industrija Skupnosti in se prodaja na trgu Skupnosti.
It is therefore provisionally concluded that all types of FeSi are considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se začasno sklene, da so si vse zadevne vrste fero-silicija podobne v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports inter alia originating in the PRC and in Kazakhstan, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of the said Article for those exporting producers which were found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, i.e. where it is shown that market economy conditions prevail in respect of the manufacture and sale of the like product.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe se v protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom inter alia iz LRK in iz Kazahstana normalna vrednost določi v skladu z odstavki 1 do 6 navedenega člena za tiste proizvajalce izvoznike, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, tj. kjer se izkaže, da v zvezi s proizvodnjo in prodajo podobnega izdelka veljajo pogoji tržnega gospodarstva.
Briefly, and for ease of reference only, these criteria are set out in a summarised form below:
Ta merila so na kratko navedena spodaj v strnjeni obliki, zaradi boljše preglednosti:
accounting records are independently audited, in line with International Accounting Standards (IAS) and applied for all purposes;
računovodski izkazi so neodvisno revidirani v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi (MRS) in se uporabljajo za vse namene;
there are no significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system;
ni večjih izkrivljanj, ki bi še ostala iz bivšega sistema netržnega gospodarstva;
Three Chinese and one Kazakh exporting producers requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation and replied to the MET claim form within the given deadlines.
Trije kitajski in en kazahstanski proizvajalec izvoznik so zahtevali TGO v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe in so v danih rokih izpolnili obrazec zahtevka za TGO.
One Chinese producer demonstrated during an on-the-spot verification visit that it meets all five MET criteria.
En kitajski proizvajalec je med preveritvenim obiskom na kraju samem dokazal, da izpolnjuje vseh pet meril za TGO.
Consequently its MET claim was accepted and the dumping and injury analysis were based on its data.
Zato je bil njegov zahtevek za TGO sprejet, analiza dampinga in škode pa je bila narejena na podlagi njegovih podatkov.
For the other two Chinese exporting producers, it was established during the verification visit that MET was not warranted.
Za druga dva kitajska izvoznika je bilo med preveritvenim obiskom ugotovljeno, da TGO ni utemeljen.
The verification established that one Chinese exporting producer did not meet criteria one to three.
Na podlagi preveritve je bilo ugotovljeno, da en kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik ni izpolnjeval prvega, drugega in tretjega merila.
Firstly, it did not demonstrate to be free from State interference, inter alia because the Communist party, which was not a shareholder, interfered in basic company decisions and the organisational responsibility for profit distribution decisions remained unclear (criterion one).
Prvič, ni dokazal, da ni prišlo do vmešavanja državnih organov, inter alia ker se je komunistična partija, ki ni bila delničarka, vmešavala v osnovne odločitve družbe, organizacijska odgovornost za odločitve o razdeljevanju dobička pa je ostala nejasna (prvo merilo).
Secondly, it did not substantiate that it had one clear set of basic accounting records which were prepared and audited in compliance with IAS, because its depreciation technique was neither in line with IAS nor Chinese accounting principles and led to the overstating of costs.
Drugič, ni dokazal, da ima jasen seznam osnovnih računovodskih evidenc, ki bi bile pripravljene in revidirane v skladu z MRS, ker njegova metoda amortiziranja ni bila ne v skladu z MRS ne s kitajskimi predpisi o računovodstvu, kar je imelo za posledico precenitev stroškov.
Furthermore, as the above breaches of IAS were not mentioned in the audit report, the company did not demonstrate that its records were audited in line with the international accounting standards, (criterion two).
Ker poleg tega zgoraj navedene kršitve MRS niso bile omenjene v revizijskem poročilu, družba ni dokazala, da so bile njene evidence revidirane v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi (drugo merilo).
Finally, it did not demonstrate to be free from significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy, in particular because it obtained from the State land use rights without payment and its assets evaluation during the foundation process of the company remained unclear (criterion three).
Nazadnje tudi ni dokazal, da ni bilo znatnih izkrivljanj, prenesenih iz prejšnjega netržnega gospodarstva, zlasti ker mu je država dodelila pravice do rabe zemljišč brez plačila in ker je ocena premoženja med postopkom ustanovitve družbe ostala nejasna (tretje merilo).
Another Chinese exporting producer was unable to demonstrate that it had one clear set of basic accounting records which were prepared and audited in line with IAS: it changed its estimates regarding the useful lives of its assets between two financial years without clear notice, which led to the understating of costs, a practice which is neither in compliance with IAS nor Chinese accounting principles.
Drugi kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik ni mogel dokazati, da ima jasen seznam osnovnih računovodskih evidenc, ki bi bile pripravljene in revidirane v skladu z MRS: brez jasnega opozorila je spremenil svoje ocene glede življenjske dobe svojih sredstev med dvema finančnima letoma, kar je povzročilo podcenitev stroškov; takšna praksa ni v skladu ne z MRS ne s kitajskimi predpisi o računovodstvu.
Moreover, it failed to disclose in its financial statements, and for any class of its assets, the depreciation methods used and the useful lives of the assets or the depreciation rates used.
Poleg tega v svojih finančnih izkazih za nobeno kategorijo svojih sredstev ni razkril uporabljenih metod amortiziranja in življenjske dobe sredstev ali uporabljenih stopenj amortiziranja.
Finally, as this incompliance of IAS was not mentioned in the audit report, it did not demonstrate that its records were audited in line with the international accounting standards (criterion two).
To neupoštevanje MRS nenazadnje tudi ni bilo omenjeno v revizijskem poročilu, zaradi česar družba ni dokazala, da so bile njene evidence revidirane v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi (drugo merilo).
Consequently, it was concluded that both Chinese exporting producers did not fulfil the conditions set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da ta dva kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika nista izpolnila pogojev iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
The Kazakh exporter did not allow an on-the-spot verification visit to verify its MET claim.
Kazahstanski izvoznik ni dovolil preveritvenega obiska na kraju samem, ki bi omogočil preveritev njegovega zahtevka za TGO.
Consequently its MET claim had to be disregarded.
Zato njegov zahtevek za TGO ni bil upoštevan.
In this regard, it is noted that even if the exporting producer in Kazakhstan would appear to meet the MET criteria in an anti-dumping proceeding regarding other alloy products, in the absence of cooperation and in particular in view of the lack of information concerning the decisions of the company regarding prices, costs and inputs, including raw materials, the Commission is not in a position to transpose the MET determination of the other investigation to this proceeding.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da tudi če bi se izkazalo, da proizvajalec izvoznik v Kazahstanu izpolnjuje merila TGO v protidampinškem postopku glede drugih zlitin, Komisija zaradi nesodelovanja in zlasti zaradi pomanjkanja informacij glede odločitev družbe v zvezi s cenami ne more prenesti določitve TGO druge preiskave na ta postopek.
Comments were received from all three companies that were not granted MET.
Predložene so bile pripombe vseh treh družb, ki jim TGO ni bil odobren.
One Chinese exporting producer and the Kazakh exporting producer did not provide any new evidence that would change the findings regarding their MET determination.
En kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik in kazahstanski proizvajalec izvoznik nista predložila nobenih novih dokazil, ki bi spremenila ugotovitve glede njune določitve TGO.
The other Chinese exporting producer claimed that the effect of the change in the estimated useful life of its assets was immaterial (around 1 %) when expressed as a percentage of turnover and was therefore not noted in its financial statements nor in the audit report.
Drugi kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da je učinek spremembe ocenjene življenjske dobe njegovih sredstev, izražene kot odstotek prometa, neznaten (približno 1 %) in zato ni bil evidentiran v njegovih finančnih izkazih ali v revizijskem poročilu.
However, the investigation showed that indeed the materiality of the change was significant when compared to the operating or the net profit of the company (over 20 %).
Vendar pa je preiskava pokazala, da je pomen spremembe v primerjavi s poslovanjem ali neto dobičkom družbe velik (čez 20 %).
Moreover the company provided contradicting information as regards to materiality thresholds allegedly used by the various audit firms.
Poleg tega je družba predložila nasprotujoče si podatke glede pragov pomembnosti, ki naj bi jih bile uporabile različne revizorske družbe.
On this basis the claim of the company was rejected.
Na tej podlagi je bil zahtevek družbe zavrnjen.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, a countrywide duty, if any, is established for countries falling under that Article, except in those cases where companies are able to demonstrate that they meet all criteria set out in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe se za države, ki jih zajema navedeni člen, uvede dajatev na ravni države, če sploh, razen v primerih, ko lahko družbe dokažejo, da izpolnjujejo vsa merila za individualno obravnavo, določena v členu 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
As far as the PRC is concerned, both exporting producers which did not meet the MET criteria had also claimed IT in the event that they were not granted MET.
Oba proizvajalca izvoznika v LRK, ki nista izpolnila meril za TGO, sta zahtevala tudi IP, če jima TGO ne bi bil odobren.
On the basis of information available it was found that one of these Chinese exporting producers did not meet all the requirements for IT as set forth in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation, specifically it did not demonstrate to be sufficiently free from State interference.
Na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij je bilo ugotovljeno, da eden od teh kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ni izpolnil vseh zahtev za IO, kakor so določene v členu 9(5) osnovne uredbe; predvsem ni dokazal, da je dovolj neodvisen od vmešavanja države.
It was therefore concluded that IT should not be granted to this exporting producers in the PRC.
Na podlagi tega je bilo zaključeno, da se IO temu proizvajalcu izvozniku v LRK ne odobri.
The other Chinese exporter which did not meet the MET criteria, however, demonstrated that it met all the requirements for IT as set forth in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Drugi kitajski izvoznik, ki ni izpolnil meril za TGO, pa je dokazal, da izpolnjuje vse zahteve za IO, kakor so določene v členu 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
As far as Kazakhstan is concerned, the exporting producer who requested MET also claimed IT in the event that it was not granted MET.
Proizvajalec izvoznik v Kazahstanu, ki je zahteval TGO, je prav tako zahteval IO, če mu TGO ne bi bil odobren.
However, this company did not allow an on-the-spot verification of its IT request, which therefore had to be rejected.
Vendar pa ta družba ni dovolila preveritve svojega zahtevka za IO na kraju samem, ki je bil zato zavrnjena.
According to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, in economies in transition normal value for exporting producers not granted MET has to be established on the basis of the price or constructed value in a market economy third country (analogue country).
Na podlagi člena 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe se mora v gospodarstvih v tranziciji normalna vrednost za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim TGO ni bil odobren, določiti na podlagi cene ali konstruirane vrednosti v tržnem gospodarstvu tretje države (primerljive države).
In the notice of initiation Norway was proposed as an appropriate analogue country for the purpose of establishing normal value for the PRC and Kazakhstan.
V obvestilu o začetku je bila Norveška predlagana kot ustrezna primerljiva država za namen ugotovitve normalne vrednosti za LRK in Kazahstan.
The Commission invited all interested parties to comment on this proposal.
Komisija je vse zainteresirane stranke pozvala k predložitvi pripomb o tem predlogu.
Only one interested party submitted comments proposing as alternative analogue countries Brazil, South Africa or, but conditional on not making energy price adjustments to the normal value, Russia.
Samo ena zainteresirana stranka je predložila pripombe, v katerih je kot možne primerljive države predlagala Brazilijo, Južno Afriko ali, pod pogojem, da ne pride do prilagoditve normalne vrednosti zaradi cen za energijo, Rusijo.
The Commission contacted known companies in Brazil and South Africa.
Komisija je stopila v stik z znanimi družbami v Braziliji in Južni Afriki.
However, no questionnaire replies or any meaningful comments were received from producers in Brazil or South Africa.
Vendar pa proizvajalci v Braziliji ali Južni Afriki niso izpolnili nobenega vprašalnika in niso predložili nobenih koristnih pripomb.
With regard to Russia, it is noted that in one case an energy price adjustment turned out to be necessary in accordance with Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation.
V zvezi z Rusijo je treba opozoriti, da se je v enem primeru izkazalo, da je treba prilagoditi ceno energije v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe.
Moreover, in line with consistent practice a country engaged in injurious dumping is not taken as an analogue country.
Poleg tega je stalna praksa, da se država, ki je vpletena v škodljivi damping, ne obravnava kot primerljiva država.
Therefore, the suggested alternatives to Norway have not been pursued further.
Zato se predlagane alternative za Norveško niso nadalje preverjale.
In any event, Norway is worldwide one of the biggest FeSi producers with a competitive market and the three Norwegian major FeSi producers fully cooperated, apply state-of-the-art production techniques and have good access to input materials.
Poleg tega je Norveška s konkurenčnim trgom ena od največjih proizvajalk fero-silicija v svetovnem merilu in trije veliki norveški proizvajalci fero-silicija so v celoti sodelovali, uporabljajo najsodobnejše proizvodne tehnike in imajo dober dostop do surovin.