natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The territory of the Department of Bas-Rhin and Moselle located west of the Rhine and the channel Rhine Marne, north of the motorway A 4, east of the river Sarre and south of the border with Germany and the municipalities Holtzheim, Lingolsheim and Eckbolsheim.
Ozemlje departmajev Bas - Rhin in Moselle, ki leži zahodno od Rena in kanala Ren - Marna, severno od avtoceste A4, vzhodno od reke Sarre in južno od meje z Nemčijo, ter občine Holtzheim, Lingolsheim in Eckbolsheim.
The territory of the county of Nógrád and the territory of the county of Pest located north and east of the Danube, south of the border with Slovakia, west of the border with the county Nógrád and north of the motorway E 71.
Ozemlje okraja Nógrád in ozemlje okraja Pest, ki leži severno in vzhodno od Donave, južno od meje s Slovaško, zahodno od meje z okrajem Nógrád ter severno od avtoceste E 71.
The territory of the District Veterinary and Food Administrations (DVFA) of Žiar nad Hronom (comprising Žiar nad Hronom, Žarnovica and Banská Štiavnica districts), Zvolen (comprising Zvolen, Krupina and Detva districts), Lučenec (comprising Lučenec and Poltár districts), Veľký Krtíš (comprising Veľký Krtíš district), Komárno (comprising the territory located east of the motorway 64, north of the border with Hungary and west of the district Nové Zámky), Nové Zámky (comprising the territory located east of the district Komárno and east of the highway 64, south of highway 75 and north of the border with Hungary) and Levice (comprising the territory located east of the district Nové Zámky and east of the highway 66 (E77), south of highway 75, north of the border with Hungary and west of district Veľký Krtíš).
Ozemlje okrožnih uprav za veterino in prehrano (DVFA) Žiar nad Hronom (okrožja Žiar nad Hronom, Žarnovica in Banská Štiavnica), Zvolen (okrožja Zvolen, Krupina in Detva), Lučenec (okrožji Lučenec in Poltár), Veľký Krtíš (okrožje Veľký Krtíš), Komárno (zajema ozemlja, ki ležijo vzhodno od avtoceste 64, severno od meje z Madžarsko in zahodno od okrožja Nové Zámky), Nové Zámky (zajema ozemlja, ki ležijo vzhodno od okrožja Komárno in vzhodno od avtoceste 64, južno od avtoceste 75 in severno od meje z Madžarsko) ter Levice (zajema ozemlja, ki ležijo vzhodno od okrožja Nové Zámky in vzhodno od avtoceste 66 (E77), južno od avtoceste 75, severno od meje z Madžarsko in zahodno od okrožja Veľký Krtíš).
Political and Security Committee Decision EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU/1/2008
Sklep političnega in varnostnega odbora EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU/1/2008
of 5 March 2008
z dne 5. marca 2008
concerning the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union mission in support of security sector reform in the Republic of Guinea-Bissau, EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU
o imenovanju vodje misije Evropske unije v podporo reforme varnostnega sektorja v Republiki Gvineji Bissau, EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU
(2008/226/CFSP)
(2008/226/SZVP)
Having regard to Council Joint Action 2008/112/CFSP of 12 February 2008 on the European Union mission in support of security sector reform in the Republic of Guinea-Bissau, EU SSR GUINEA BISSAU [1], and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 8(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Skupnega ukrepa Sveta 2008/112/SZVP z dne 12. februarja 2008 o misiji Evropske unije v podporo reforme varnostnega sektorja v Republiki Gvineji Bissau, EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU [1], in zlasti drugega pododstavka člena 8(1) Pogodbe,
Pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 8(1) of Joint Action 2008/112/CFSP, the PSC is authorised, in accordance with Article 25 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU, including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.
Na podlagi drugega pododstavka člena 8(1) Skupnega ukrepa 2008/112/SZVP je PVO pooblaščen za sprejemanje ustreznih odločitev v skladu s členom 25 Pogodbe glede političnega nadzora in strateškega vodenja operacije EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU, vključno s sklepom o imenovanju vodje misije,
The Secretary General/High Representative has proposed the appointment of Mr Juan Esteban Verástegui as the Head of EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU,
Generalni sekretar/visoki predstavnik je predlagal imenovanje g. Juana Estebana Verásteguia za vodjo EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU –
Mr Juan Esteban Verástegui is hereby appointed Head of Mission of the European Union mission in support of security sector reform in the Republic of Guinea-Bissau, EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU.
Juan Esteban Verástegui se imenuje za vodjo misije Evropske unije v podporo reforme varnostnega sektorja v Republiki Gvineji Bissau, EU SSR GUINEA-BISSAU.
It shall apply until the expiry of Council Joint Action 2008/112/CFSP.
Uporablja se do izteka veljavnosti Skupnega ukrepa Sveta 2008/112/SZVP.
Done at Brussels, 5 March 2008.
V Bruslju, 5. marca 2008
OJ L 40, 14.2.2008, p. 11.
UL L 40, 14.2.2008, str. 11.
of 17 March 2008
z dne 17. marca 2008
terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of polyvinyl alcohol originating in the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan and releasing the amounts secured by way of the provisional duties imposed
o zaključku protidampinškega postopka glede uvoza polivinil alkohola s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Tajvana ter sprostitvi zneskov, zavarovanih z uvedeno začasno protidampinško dajatvijo
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“) in zlasti člena 9 Uredbe,
On 19 December 2006, the Commission published a notice [2] initiating an anti-dumping proceeding on imports into the Community of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) originating in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and Taiwan.
Komisija je 19. decembra 2006 objavila sporočilo [2] o začetku protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom polivinil alkohola (PVA) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (LRK) in Tajvana v Skupnost.
On 17 September 2007, the Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 1069/2007 [3] (the provisional Regulation) imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on PVA originating in the PRC.
Komisija je 17. septembra 2007 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1069/2007 [3] („začasna uredba“) uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev na PVA s poreklom iz LRK.
With regard to Taiwan, no provisional measures were imposed.
Glede Tajvana začasni ukrepi niso bili uvedeni.
As set out in recital 13 of the provisional Regulation, the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 October 2005 to 30 September 2006 (IP).
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 13 začasne uredbe, je preiskava dampinga in škode potekala od 1. oktobra 2005 do 30. septembra 2006 („OP“).
With respect to the trends relevant for the injury assessment, the Commission analysed data covering the period from 1 January 2003 to the end of the IP (period considered).
Ob upoštevanju trendov, pomembnih za oceno škode, je Komisija analizirala podatke iz obdobja od 1. januarja 2003 do konca OP („obravnavano obdobje“).
Following the decision to impose provisional anti-dumping duties on imports of PVA originating in the PRC and not to impose such measures on imports from Taiwan, several interested parties submitted comments in writing.
Po odločitvi o uvedbi začasnih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz PVA s poreklom iz LRK in da se enaki ukrepi ne uvedejo za uvoz iz Tajvana, so nekatere zainteresirane stranke predložile pisne pripombe.
The parties who so requested were also granted the opportunity to be heard.
Strankam je bila na zahtevo dana tudi možnost za zaslišanje.
The Commission intensified the investigation with regard to Community interest aspects and exceptionally allowed users pertaining to the paper industry, an important users sector which had not cooperated so far, to file a users’ questionnaire reply.
Komisija je okrepila preiskavo ob upoštevanju vidikov interesa Skupnosti in izjemoma dovolila uporabnikom iz papirne industrije, pomembnega sektorja uporabnikov, ki do sedaj še ni sodeloval, da predložijo izpolnjen vprašalnik za uporabnike.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to terminate the proceeding concerning imports of PVA originating in the PRC and Taiwan and to release the amounts secured by way of the provisional duty.
Vse stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih naj bi se zaključil postopek v zvezi z uvozom PVA s poreklom iz LRK in Tajvana ter sprostili zneski, zavarovani z začasno dajatvijo.
The same Community user as referred to under recital 16 of the provisional Regulation reiterated and elaborated further its arguments for the exclusion from the product scope of a certain grade (the contested grade) which it called ‘low ash NMWD PVA’ and which it purchased, inter alia, from the PRC.
Isti uporabnik iz Skupnosti, kot je naveden v uvodni izjavi 16 začasne uredbe, je ponovil in še podrobneje opredelil svoje argumente za izvzetje iz opredelitve izdelka določene kakovosti („spodbijana kakovost“), ki jo je poimenoval „nizka stopnja pepela NMWD PVA“ in ki se med drugim dobavlja iz LRK.
This user alleged (i) that the Commission had not given sufficient reasons for considering that the contested grade shared its basic physical and technical characteristics with the other grades falling within the product definition and it further insisted (ii) that this grade had very specific end-uses.
Ta uporabnik je trdil, (i) da Komisija ni podala zadovoljivih utemeljitev za mnenje, da ima izdelek spodbijane kakovosti enake osnovne fizične in tehnične lastnosti kot izdelki drugih kakovosti, ki jih vključuje opredelitev izdelka, in je še vedno vztrajal, (ii) da ima izdelek te kakovosti zelo posebno končno uporabo.
Moreover, it submitted (iii) that the contested grade, according to this user, was a co-polymer and hence would not fall under the product scope.
Poleg tega je trdil, (iii) da je izdelek spodbijane kakovosti po njegovem mnenju kopolimer in zato ne sme biti vključena v opredelitev izdelka.
Before going into the detail of this users claims, it is first to be noted that the ash content in PVA is an impurity; the lower the ash level, the purer the PVA is.
Pred natančnejšo preučitvijo trditev tega uporabnika je treba poudariti, da vsebnost pepela v PVA predstavlja nečistočo; manjša kot je vsebnost pepela, bolj čist je PVA.
Secondly, the notion of ‘low ash PVA’ is subjective.
Poleg tega je pojem „nizke vsebnosti pepela v PVA“ subjektiven.
There is no generally agreed standard for it, which means that each producer has its own ceiling for establishing whether a PVA is low ash or not.
Zanj ni splošno sprejetega standarda, kar pomeni, da ima vsak proizvajalec svoj lastni prag za določitev nizke vsebnosti pepela v PVA.
It was found that in practice, this amounts to significant differences: amongst the producers subject to the investigation the ceiling for low ash PVA could vary from a maximum ash content of 0,09 % to 0,5 %.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da v praksi to povzroča precejšnje razlike: med proizvajalci, ki so bili predmet preiskave, se je prag za določitev nizke vsebnosti pepela v PVA gibal med 0,09 % in 0,5 %.
The user concerned would not be amongst the most restrictive, i.e. its ash ceiling would probably be considered by other interested parties as rather high.
Zadevni uporabnik ne spada med uporabnike z najnižjimi omejitvami, kar pomeni, da bi druge zainteresirane stranke njegov prag za določitev nizke vsebnosti pepela najverjetneje ocenile kot precej visok.
As concerns the issues raised by this party and mentioned under recital 7, they have been seriously considered and can be summarised as follows.
O problemih, ki jih je izpostavila zadevna stranka in so omenjeni v uvodni izjavi 7, se je resno razpravljalo, ugotovitve pa so povzete spodaj.
The contested grade would have different basic physical and technical characteristics
Izdelek spodbijane kakovosti naj bi imel drugačne osnovne fizične in tehnične značilnosti
It is to be recalled that the basic physical and technical characteristics of the product concerned were provisionally defined in recital 14 of the provisional Regulation.
Treba je spomniti, da so bile osnovne fizične in tehnične značilnosti zadevnega izdelka začasno opredeljene v uvodni izjavi 14 začasne uredbe.
The product concerned is therein defined as a specific kind of resin with certain technical parameters.
Zadevni izdelek je v tej uredbi opredeljen kot posebna vrsta smole z določenimi tehničnimi parametri.
The parameters mentioned in this product definition and used to distinguish between product concerned and other grades of PVA refer to viscosity (3 mPas -61 mPas, measured in 4 % solution) and hydrolysis (84,0 mol % -99,9 mol %).
Parametri, ki so bili navedeni pri opredelitvi tega izdelka in uporabljeni za razlikovanje med zadevnim izdelkom in PVA drugih kakovosti, se nanašajo na viskoznost (3 mPas – 61 mPas, izmerjeno v 4 % raztopini) in hidrolizo (84,0 mol % – 99,9 mol %).
All grades falling under the product definition are sometimes referred to as standard grades, which means that they can all be produced on a standard PVA production line and the production costs of these grades are similar.
Vse kakovosti, ki jih zajema opredelitev izdelka, se včasih opredelijo kot standardne kakovosti, kar pomeni, da se lahko izdelajo v standardni proizvodni liniji PVA, proizvodni stroški za izdelke teh kakovosti pa so podobni.
The opposite is true for the grades which fall under the same CN-code but outside the product definition: they cannot be produced on a standard PVA production line, require a different production technology and additional equipment, and the production cost can therefore be very different.
Nasprotno velja za izdelke kakovosti, ki spadajo pod isto oznako KN, vendar niso vključeni v opredelitev izdelka: ni jih mogoče izdelati v standardni proizvodni liniji PVA, zahtevajo različno proizvodno tehnologijo in dodatno opremo, zato so lahko proizvodni stroški zelo različni.
The grades not covered by the product definition have also very different properties when compared to those covered by the product definition.
Izdelki kakovosti, ki jih opredelitev izdelka ne vključuje, imajo tudi zelo drugačne lastnosti v primerjavi s tistimi, ki jih opredelitev izdelka zajema.
As concerns the degree of viscosity and hydrolysis: (i) the low viscosity grades are low molecular weight PVA which are difficult to handle, inter alia, resulting in a low production yield, whereas (ii) the high viscosity grades, which are also difficult to handle, are used for high-end glossy paper coatings, a very special type of application where unwanted cracks which are usually formed have to be avoided; (iii) high degree hydrolysis grades are also mainly used for that application and (iv) PVA grades with a low degree of hydrolysis are not soluble in water or form unstable solutions with water.
Glede stopnje viskoznosti in hidrolize (i) ima PVA z nizkimi stopnjami viskoznosti majhno molekulsko maso in je težko obvladljiv, kar se med drugim odraža v nizkem proizvodnem izkoristku, medtem ko se (ii) PVA z visoko stopnjo viskoznosti, ki je prav tako težko obvladljiv, uporablja za kakovostne svetleče papirne obloge, posebno uporabo, kjer se je treba izogibati nezaželenim razpokam, ki običajno nastanejo; (iii) za navedeno uporabo se uporabljajo zlasti izdelki z visoko stopnjo hidrolize, (iv) PVA z nizko stopnjo hidrolize pa niso topni v vodi in ne tvorijo neobstojnih raztopin z vodo.
Such products are essentially used for the production of suspension PVC and at elevated temperatures such products will fall out of solution.
Tovrstni izdelki se običajno uporabljajo za proizvodnjo suspenzijskega PVC in se pri visokih temperaturah izločijo iz raztopine.
The user submitted that to produce the PVB resin it would need for producing its PVB-film, six characteristics of the PVA were of absolute importance.
Uporabnik je navedel, da je za proizvodnjo smole PVB, ki jo potrebuje za proizvodnjo folije PVB, zelo pomembnih šest lastnosti PVA.
The combination of the parameters for these six characteristics would make the contested grade unique as compared to all other PVA grades on the market.
Kombinacija parametrov za teh šest lastnosti bi povzročila, da bi se spodbijana kakovost razlikovala od vseh ostalih kakovosti PVA na trgu.
Whilst analysing this claim, it was indeed found that for some applications the technical specifications can be more stringent than for others.
Med analizo te trditve je bilo ugotovljeno, da so pri nekaterih uporabah tehnične specifikacije lahko strožje kot pri drugih.
At the same time, however, it was established that as a matter of fact all grades, including the commodity grades falling under the product scope and sometimes referred to as ‘standard grades’, have a unique combination of characteristics.
Hkrati je bilo ugotovljeno, da imajo vse kakovosti, vključno s kakovostjo blaga, ki je vključena v opredelitev izdelka in je v nekaterih primerih obravnavana kot „standardna kakovost“, edinstveno kombinacijo lastnosti.
Depending on the desired application, one or another grade would be chosen.
Glede na želeno uporabo se izbere ena ali druga kakovost.
This is valid not only for the application of the user concerned, but for other applications too.
To ne velja samo za uporabo s strani zadevnega uporabnika, temveč tudi za vse ostale uporabe.
Consequently, the claim had to be dismissed.
Zato je treba trditev ovreči.
The contested grade would have very specific end-uses
Izdelek spodbijane kakovosti ima zelo posebne končne uporabe
The user concerned also contested the Commission’s appreciation of the PVA user market and specifically alleged that the PVB user market would be very diverse.
Zadevni uporabnik je tudi spodbijal stališče Komisije glede uporabniškega trga PVA in izrecno navedel, da naj bi bil uporabniški trg PVB zelo raznolik.
In this respect, as already indicated in the provisional Regulation, the user used this grade of PVA for the production of PVB which is the largest application in the Community, accounting for 25 % to 29 % of PVA consumption, and also the fastest growing application because of the strong increase in demand for PVB-film.
Kot je bilo že navedeno v začasni uredbi, je uporabnik uporabljal PVA te kakovosti za proizvodnjo PVB, kar je najpogostejša uporaba v Skupnosti in predstavlja 25–29 % potrošnje PVA ter je zaradi velikega povečanja povpraševanja po foliji PVB najhitreje rastoča uporaba.
Further down-stream, the investigation has also shown that close to 90 % of the PVB produced in the Community is consequently used for the production of PVB-film, which is also the eventual application by the user concerned (but it is not the only PVB-film producer in the Community).
Nadalje je preiskava pokazala, da se skoraj 90 % PVB, ki se proizvede v Skupnosti, posledično uporabi za proizvodnjo folije PVB, ki jo uporablja tudi zadevni uporabnik (vendar ni edini proizvajalec folije PVB v Skupnosti).
It is therefore confirmed, as mentioned in recital 17 of the provisional Regulation, that the specific use of this interested party is one of the main applications which, in view of its market importance, cannot be characterised as not standard.
Zato je potrjeno, kot je bilo navedeno v uvodni izjavi 17 začasne uredbe, da je posebna uporaba te zainteresirane stranke ena izmed glavnih uporab, ki glede na svoj tržni pomen ne more biti opredeljena kot „nestandardna“.
As concerns its alleged specific use, the user concerned also argued that the contested grade could not be substituted by other models which would illustrate this specific end-use.
Glede na njegovo domnevno posebno uporabo je zadevni uporabnik trdil, da izdelkov spodbijane kakovosti ne morejo nadomestiti drugi modeli, ki bi ponazarjali to posebno končno uporabo.
In this respect, it was firstly established that this user was not buying exclusively from the Chinese producer concerned and already had several alternative sources.
Glede tega je bilo najprej ugotovljeno, da ta uporabnik ni kupoval zgolj od zadevnega kitajskega proizvajalca in je že imel več alternativnih virov.
In fact, during the IP it sourced less than 5 % of its purchases of PVA for which it claimed exclusion from the producer in the PRC.
V OP je izvedel manj kot 5 % nakupov PVA, za katere je zahteval izvzetje od proizvajalca v LRK.
The remaining purchased volumes were sourced from three other producers in different countries.
Preostala dobavljena količina je izvirala od treh drugih proizvajalcev v različnih državah.
Moreover, it was established that although most of the other grades sold on the Community market indeed could indeed not be used as an alternative to the contested grade, the contested grade itself could be used in other applications, too, and it was made available on the Community market at prices similar to those of other grades imported from the PRC.
Nadalje je bilo ugotovljeno, da čeprav večina izdelkov, ki so bili prodani na trgu Skupnosti, dejansko ni mogla biti uporabljena kot alternativa izdelkom spodbijane kakovosti, se je izdelek spodbijane kakovosti lahko uporabljal pri drugih uporabah in je bil na trgu Skupnosti na voljo po cenah, ki so bile podobne cenam izdelkov drugih kakovosti, ki so bili uvoženi iz LRK.
In view of the above, the argument that the contested grade could not be substituted had to be dismissed.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se utemeljitev, da izdelka spodbijane kakovosti ni bilo mogoče nadomestiti, zavrne.
The contested grade would be a co-polymer, not a homopolymer
Izdelek spodbijane stopnje naj bi bil kopolimer in ne homopolimer
Following the imposition of provisional measures, the user claimed that low ash PVA would be a co-polymer and not a homopolymer.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov je uporabnik trdil, da nizka stopnja pepela v PVA predstavlja kopolimer in ne homopolimer.
This claim was based on the fact that it would contain two building blocks.
Ta trditev temelji na dejstvu, da vsebuje dve temeljni sestavini.
This issue was investigated and it was found that PVA is the result of an initial hompolymeric polymerisation.
Ta problem je bil raziskan in ugotovljeno je bilo, da je PVA rezultat začetne homopolimerne polimerizacije.
However, the subsequent hydrolysis process is always incomplete (between 84,0 mol % and 99,9 mol %) and to that extent, it could also be argued that PVA contains two building blocks and can be referred to as co-polymer.
Vendar pa je sledeči postopek hidrolize vedno pomanjkljiv (med 84,0 mol % in 99,9 mol %), zato je v tem smislu mogoče trditi, da PVA vsebuje dve glavni sestavini in se zato prišteva h kopolimerom.
In order to avoid any confusion, it was therefore deemed appropriate to clarify the product scope definition determined in the provisional Regulation.
Da bi se izognili kakršni koli zmedi, je bilo treba razjasniti opredelitve izdelka iz začasne uredbe.
Therefore, the product concerned is definitively defined as certain co-polymeric polyvinyl alcohols (PVA) based on a homopolymeric polymerisation with a viscosity (measured in 4 % solution) of 3 mPas or more but not exceeding 61 mPas and a degree of hydrolysis of 84,0 mol % or more but not exceeding 99,9 mol % originating in the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan and normally declared within CN code ex39053000.
Zato se zadevni izdelek dokončno opredeli kot kopolimerni polivinil alkohol (PVA), ki temelji na homopolimerni polimerizaciji, z viskoznostjo (izmerjeno v 4-odstotni raztopini) 3 mPas ali več, vendar največ 61 mPas, in stopnjo hidrolize 84,0 mol % ali več, vendar največ 99,9 mol %, izvira iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Tajvana ter je običajno deklariran pod oznako KN ex39053000.
With regard to Taiwan, no provisional measures were imposed, because, as stated in recitals 29 and 30 of the provisional Regulation, no dumping was provisionally found regarding imports of the product concerned originating in Taiwan.
Glede Tajvana niso bili uvedeni začasni ukrepi, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 29 in 30 začasne uredbe, in damping glede uvoza zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Tajvana začasno ni bil ugotovljen.