natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If, within three weeks following the submission of a proposal, a Member State representative has not cast a negative vote, he shall be deemed to have voted in favour of the proposal.
Če predstavnik države članice ne poda negativnega glasu v treh tednih po predložitvi predloga, se šteje, da je glasoval za predlog.
If discussion at a meeting of the Committee is specifically requested by one of its members not later than five working days before expiry of the three-week period referred to in the paragraph 2, the proposal shall be submitted in the next scheduled meeting of the Committee.
Če član odbora najkasneje pet delovnih dni pred potekom tritedenskega roka iz odstavka 2 posebej zahteva, da se o predlogu razpravlja na seji odbora, se predlog prenese na naslednjo načrtovano sejo odbora.
In exceptional cases of particular urgency, the Bank may then request that an extraordinary meeting of the Committee be convened by the Chairman pursuant to Article 2.
Izjemoma, kadar gre za posebej nujne primere, lahko Banka zahteva, da predsednik skliče izredno sejo odbora v skladu s členom 2.
Without prejudice to Article 13(6) of the Implementing Regulation, the Committee’s approval or favourable opinion may be granted subject to any comment specified by the Committee.
Brez poseganja v člen 13(6) Izvedbene uredbe se lahko odobritev ali pozitivno mnenje odbora poda s pridržkom zaradi morebitne pripombe, ki jo podrobneje pojasni odbor.
The Committee may ask for the appraisal of a request or proposal to be supplemented in certain respects.
Odbor lahko zahteva, da se ocena prošnje ali predloga dopolni z določenih vidikov.
In such an event, the request or the proposal can be put before the Committee a second time.
V takšnem primeru se lahko zahteva ali predlog ponovno predloži odboru.
The opinions delivered by the Committee shall be forwarded to the Bank’s decision making bodies.
Mnenja, ki jih poda odbor, se posredujejo organom odločanja Banke.
A record of the main conclusions of each meeting of the Committee and the main standpoints adopted by the members of the Committee shall be drawn up by the secretariat under the responsibility of the Chairman within two weeks of the date of the meeting.
Sekretariat pod odgovornostjo predsednika v dveh tednih od dneva seje sestavi zapisnik o glavnih zaključkih vsake seje odbora in glavnih stališčih, ki so jih sprejeli člani odbora.
The secretariat shall likewise record the opinions and votes cast under written procedure.
Sekretariat na enak način sestavi zapisnik o mnenjih in glasovih, podanih v okviru pisnega postopka.
These records shall be sent to the members of the Committee.
Ta zapisnik se pošljejo članom odbora.
The record shall be deemed final once approved by the Committee, whether by written procedure or at a subsequent meeting.
Zapisnik velja za dokončnega, ko ga potrdi odbor bodisi s pisnim postopkom bodisi na naslednji seji.
Correspondence concerning the Committee shall be addressed to the secretariat, for the attention of the Chairman of the Committee.
Pošta, naslovljena na odbor, se pošilja sekretariatu odbora, v roke predsednika odbora.
All representatives and observers attending meetings of the Committee shall observe the confidentiality of the Committee’s work and deliberations.
Vsi predstavniki in opazovalci, ki se udeležijo seje odbora, spoštujejo zaupnost njegovega dela in razprav.
Documents relating to such work and deliberations shall be for the use of those to whom they are addressed, who shall be responsible for their safekeeping and the preservation of their confidentiality.
Dokumenti, povezani s takšnim delom in razpravami, so namenjeni osebam, na katere so naslovljeni, te pa so odgovorne za njihovo varovanje in zaupnost.
The operating expenditure of the Committee, including travel expenses for one representative of each Member State, shall be borne by the Bank.
Stroške delovanja odbora, vključno s potnimi stroški po enega predstavnika vsake posamezne države članice, nosi Banka.
The Bank shall place at the disposal of the Committee the premises and equipment necessary for its work.
Prostore in opremo, ki jih odbor potrebuje za svoje delo, zagotovi Banka.
All notices, correspondence or documents to be transmitted pursuant to these Rules may be so transmitted using electronic mail or facsimile machine.
Vsa obvestila, dopisi ali dokumenti, ki jih je treba posredovati v skladu s tem poslovnikom, se lahko posredujejo z elektronsko pošto ali faksom.
of 29 September 2008
z dne 29. septembra 2008
establishing, pursuant to Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, a common methodology for the calculation of annual sales of portable batteries and accumulators to end-users
o vzpostavitvi skupne metodologije za izračun letne prodaje prenosnih baterij in akumulatorjev končnim uporabnikom v skladu z Direktivo 2006/66/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(notified under document number C(2008) 5339)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 5339)
Having regard to Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators and repealing Directive 91/157/EEC [1], and in particular point (b) of Article 10(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2006/66/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. septembra 2006 o baterijah in akumulatorjih ter odpadnih baterijah in akumulatorjih in razveljavitvi Direktive 91/157/EGS [1], in zlasti točke (b) člena 10(4) Direktive,
The annual sales of portable batteries and accumulators to end-users should be expressed as the weight of the portable batteries and accumulators placed on the market in the territory of the Member State in the year concerned, excluding any portable batteries and accumulators that have left the territory of that Member State in that year before being sold to end-users.
Letna prodaja prenosnih baterij in akumulatorjev končnim uporabnikom se izrazi z maso prenosnih baterij in akumulatorjev, dano na trg na ozemlju države članice v zadevnem letu, iz katere so izvzete vse prenosne baterije in akumulatorji, ki so pred prodajo končnim uporabnikom zapustili ozemlje tiste države članice v zadevnem letu.
Member States should base the calculation of annual sales of portable batteries and accumulators to end-users on collected data.
Države članice opravijo izračun letne prodaje prenosnih baterij in akumulatorjev končnim uporabnikom na podlagi zbranih podatkov.
Statistically significant estimates based on the collected data may also be used for the calculation.
Pri izračunu se lahko uporabijo tudi statistično pomembne ocene, pridobljene iz zbranih podatkov.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 18(1) of Directive 2006/12/EC of the European Parliament and the Council [2],
Ukrepi, predvideni s to odločbo, so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 18(1) Direktive 2006/12/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] –
Member States shall calculate the annual sales of portable batteries and accumulators to end-users in a given year, as the weight of portable batteries and accumulators placed on the market in the territory of the Member State in the year concerned, excluding any portable batteries and accumulators that have left the territory of that Member State in that year before being sold to the end-users.
Države članice izračunajo letno prodajo prenosnih baterij in akumulatorjev končnim uporabnikom v zadevnem letu na podlagi mase prenosnih baterij in akumulatorjev, dane na trgu na ozemlju države članice v zadevnem letu, iz katere so izvzete vse prenosne baterije in akumulatorji, ki so pred prodajo končnim uporabnikom zapustili ozemlje tiste države članice v zadevnem letu.
The placing on the market of each battery shall be counted once.
Dajanje v promet posamezne baterije se šteje samo enkrat.
The calculation provided for in Article 1 shall be based on collected data or statistically significant estimates based on collected data.
Izračun iz člena 1 temelji na zbranih podatkih ali statistično pomembnih ocenah, pridobljenih iz zbranih podatkov.
Done at Brussels, 29 September 2008.
V Bruslju, 29. septembra 2008
of 30 September 2008
z dne 30. septembra 2008
concerning the non-inclusion of dicofol in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance
o nevključitvi dikofola v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o preklicu registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo navedeno snov
(notified under document number C(2008) 5105)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 5105)
That list includes dicofol.
Navedeni seznam vključuje dikofol.
For dicofol the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed in accordance with the provisions laid down in Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 and (EC) No 1490/2002 for a range of uses proposed by the notifier.
Vplivi dikofola na zdravje ljudi in okolje so bili ocenjeni v skladu z določbami uredb (ES) št. 451/2000 in (ES) št. 1490/2002 za vrste uporab, ki jih je predlagal prijavitelj.
For dicofol the rapporteur Member State was Spain and all relevant information was submitted on 18 September 2006.
Država članica poročevalka za dikofol je bila Španija, vse ustrezne informacije pa so bile predložene 18. septembra 2006.
The Commission examined dicofol in accordance with Article 11a of Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002.
Komisija je preučila dikofol v skladu s členom 11a Uredbe (ES) št. 1490/2002.
During the examination of this active substance by the Committee, taking into account comments received from Member States, it was concluded that there are clear indications that it may be expected that it has harmful effects on human health and in particular on both operators and workers, because the exposure is greater than 100 % of the AOEL and data gaps in the consumer risk assessment.
Odbor je med preučevanjem te aktivne snovi ob upoštevanju pripomb držav članic ugotovil, da obstajajo jasni znaki, na podlagi katerih se lahko pričakuje, da ima aktivna snov škodljive učinke na zdravje ljudi in zlasti na izvajalce tretiranja in delavce, saj je izpostavljenost večja od 100 % AOEL in so podatki o oceni tveganja za potrošnike pomanjkljivi.
Moreover, other concerns which were identified by the rapporteur Member States in its assessment report are included in the review report for the substance.
Poleg tega so drugi pomisleki, ki so jih države članice poročevalke izrazile v poročilu o oceni, vključenem v poročilo o pregledu za to snov.
The Commission invited the notifier to submit its comments on the results of the examination of dicofol and on its intention or not to further support the substance.
Komisija je prijavitelja pozvala, naj predloži pripombe o rezultatih preučitve dikofola in sporoči, ali bo še naprej vztrajal pri vključitvi navedene snovi na seznam.
However, despite the arguments put forwards by the notifier, the concerns identified could not be eliminated, and assessments made on the basis of the information submitted have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing dicofol satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Toda kljub argumentom, ki jih je prijavitelj predložil, se navedenih pomislekov ni dalo odpraviti, po ocenah na podlagi predloženih informacij pa ne kaže pričakovati, da bi lahko fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo dikofol, pod predvidenimi pogoji uporabe na splošno izpolnjevala zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
Dicofol should therefore not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Dikofol se zato ne sme vključiti v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Measures should be taken to ensure that authorisations granted for plant protection products containing dicofol are withdrawn within a fixed period of time and are not renewed and that no new authorisations for such products are granted.
Sprejeti je treba ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo dikofol, prekličejo v predpisanem roku in se ne podaljšajo ali izdajo nove registracije takih sredstev.
Any period of grace granted by a Member State for the disposal, storage, placing on the market and use of existing stocks of plant protection products containing dicofol should be limited to 12 months in order to allow existing stocks to be used in one further growing season, which ensures that plant protection products containing dicofol remain available for 18 months from the adoption of this Decision.
Če države članice odobrijo podaljšanje roka za odstranjevanje, skladiščenje, dajanje v promet in uporabo obstoječih zalog fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo dikofol, ga je treba omejiti na obdobje 12 mesecev, da se omogoči uporaba obstoječih zalog v naslednji rastni sezoni, s čimer se zagotovi, da fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo dikofol, ostanejo na razpolago 18 mesecev po sprejetju te odločbe.
This Decision does not prejudice the submission of an application for dicofol in accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I [4], in view of a possible inclusion in its Annex I.
Ta odločba ne vpliva na predložitev zahtevka za dikofol v skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS in Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 33/2008 z dne 17. januarja 2008 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS glede rednega in pospešenega postopka za oceno aktivnih snovi, ki so bile del delovnega programa iz člena 8(2) navedene direktive, vendar niso bile vključene v Prilogo I [4], zaradi morebitne vključitve v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi.
Dicofol shall not be included as an active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Dikofol se ne vključi kot aktivna snov v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
authorisations for plant protection products containing dicofol are withdrawn by 30 March 2009;
se registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo dikofol, prekličejo do 30. marca 2009;
no authorisations for plant protection products containing dicofol are granted or renewed from the date of publication of this Decision.
se od datuma objave te odločbe nobene registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo dikofol, ne odobrijo ali podaljšajo.
Any period of grace granted by Member States in accordance with the provisions of Article 4(6) of Directive 91/414/EEC, shall be as short as possible and shall expire on 30 March 2010 at the latest.
Morebitno podaljšanje roka, ki ga odobrijo države članice v skladu z določbami člena 4(6) Direktive 91/414/EGS, je čim krajše in traja največ do 30. marca 2010.
Done at Brussels, 30 September 2008.
V Bruslju, 30. septembra 2008
on the aid No C 7/06 (ex NN 83/05) implemented by Finland for Tieliikelaitos/Destia
o pomoči C 7/06 (ex NN 83/05), ki jo je Finska dodelila podjetju Tieliikelaitos/Destia
(notified under document number C(2007) 6073)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 6073)
(Only the Finnish and the Swedish version is authentic)
(Besedilo v finskem in švedskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above, and having regard to their comments,
ob pozivu zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo pripombe v skladu z navedenimi določbami, in ob upoštevanju njihovih pripomb,
On 22 February 2006, the Commission took a decision to open the formal investigation procedure (C(2006) 461 final) following several complaints by two Finnish industry associations, alleging that the Finnish authorities, during the process of divesting Tieliikelaitos from the Finnish national administration as a State enterprise, had violated a number of EC Treaty provisions, including those on State aids.
Komisija se je 22. februarja 2006 odločila, da po več pritožbah dveh finskih gospodarskih interesnih združenj, ki sta trdili, da so finski organi med postopkom odprodaje podjetja Tieliikelaitos od finskega državnega upravnega organa kot državnega podjetja kršili več določb Pogodbe ES, vključno z določbami o državni pomoči, sproži formalni postopek preiskave (C(2006) 461 konč.).
In a letter dated 23 February 2006, the Commission informed Finland of its decision to initiate the procedure, giving the Finnish authorities the opportunity to present their observations within a period of one month.
Komisija je v dopisu z dne 23. februarja 2006 Finsko obvestila o svoji odločitvi, da sproži postopek, in finskim organom omogočila, da v enem mesecu predložijo pripombe.
In a letter dated 3 May 2006, the Commission transmitted a copy of the decision to initiate the procedure to the complainants, giving them the opportunity to provide comments on the decision within a period of one month.
Komisija je v dopisu z dne 3. maja 2006 pritožnikom poslala izvod odločitve o sprožitvi postopka in jim omogočila, da v enem mesecu predložijo pripombe v zvezi z odločitvijo.
The Commission received Finland’s response to the Commission’s decision to initiate the procedure with letter of 31 May 2006, after having twice prolonged the time period for submitting the reply.
Komisija je odgovor Finske na odločitev o sprožitvi postopka prejela v dopisu z dne 31. maja 2006, potem ko je dvakrat podaljšala rok za predložitev odgovora.
In a letter dated 22 June 2006, the complainants transmitted their comments on the Commission’s decision to initiate the procedure.
Pritožniki so v dopisu z dne 22. junija 2006 predložili pripombe na odločitev Komisije o sprožitvi postopka.
The Commission transmitted these comments by letter of 6 July 2006 to the Finnish authorities, giving them an opportunity to respond within a period of one month.
Komisija je te pripombe predložila finskim organom v dopisu z dne 6. julija 2006 in jim omogočila, da nanje odgovorijo v enem mesecu.
The Commission received Finland’s response to the complainants’ comments by letter of 27 September 2006.
Komisija je v dopisu z dne 27. septembra 2006 prejela odgovor Finske na pripombe pritožnikov.
Following the meeting of 7 September 2006 between the Finnish authorities and the Commission, additional information was submitted by the Finnish authorities on 6 February 2007.
Po srečanju finskih organov in Komisije 7. septembra 2006 so finski organi 6. februarja 2007 predložili dodatne informacije.
On 20 April 2007 the Commission sent to the Finnish authorities a letter requesting further clarifications.
Komisija je 20. aprila 2007 finskim organom poslala dopis in zahtevala dodatna pojasnila.
The response of the Finnish authorities was received on 22 May 2007.
Odgovor finskih organov je Komisija prejela 22. maja 2007.
In its letters dating from 4 July and 27 July 2007 the Commission asked the Finnish authorities to provide the outstanding information that was necessary for the adoption of the final decision.
Komisija je v dopisih z dne 4. julija in 27. julija 2007 finske organe prosila, da zagotovijo manjkajoče informacije, ki so nujne za sprejetje končne odločitve.
The replies were received on 10 August and 29 August 2007, respectively.
Komisija je odgovore prejela 10. avgusta oziroma 29. avgusta 2007.
Tieliikelaitos is a Finnish State Enterprise, which is active in, on the one hand, road design, road construction and road maintenance, and, on the other hand, ferry services.
Podjetje Tieliikelaitos je finsko državno podjetje, ki je dejavno na področju načrtovanja, gradnje in vzdrževanja cest ter na področju trajektnih storitev.
Although since 14 February 2007 the undertaking’s name has been changed to Destia, for reasons of continuity the Commission will use throughout the text of the present decision the entity’s initial name, i.e. Tieliikelaitos.
Čeprav se je 14. februarja 2007 podjetje preimenovalo v podjetje Destia, bo Komisija zaradi doslednosti v celotnem besedilu te odločbe uporabljala prvotno ime podjetja, tj. Tieliikelaitos.
Under Finnish administrative law, a State Enterprise is a State-owned entity that is not incorporated and that carries out business activities.
Državno podjetje je po finskem upravnem pravu podjetje v državni lasti, ki sicer ni vpisano v register, vendar opravlja poslovne dejavnosti.
State Enterprises are governed by the provisions of the State Enterprise Act.
Državna podjetja urejajo določbe iz Zakona o državnih podjetjih.
The status of a State Enterprise is a hybrid status between an administrative agency and a State-owned company.
Državno podjetje ima hkrati status upravnega organa in podjetja v državni lasti.
A State Enterprise operates in accordance with business principles, however, Parliament, the Government and the relevant Ministries have decision-making and steering powers over it.
Državno podjetje deluje v skladu s poslovnimi načeli, vendar so parlament, vlada in zadevna ministrstva pristojna za sprejemanje odločitev v zvezi z njimi in njihovo usmerjanje.
Although its annual turnover figure has been decreasing over the last 6 years (15 % decrease), with the annual turnover of EUR 474,1 million in 2006, Tieliikelaitos remains an important market player in the infrastructure sector of the Finnish civil engineering market.
Čeprav se je v zadnjih šestih letih letni promet podjetja Tieliikelaitos zmanjšal (15-odstotno zmanjšanje), je podjetje z letnim prometom 474,1 milijona EUR, ki ga je doseglo leta 2006, še vedno pomemben akter na trgu sektorja infrastrukture finskega gradbeniškega trga.
The most important components of its turnover are construction services (47 %), maintenance services (31 %), surfacing and mineral aggregates services (asphalt works, road marking services, mineral aggregates production — 11 %).
Najpomembnejši del prometa tega podjetja so gradbene storitve (47 %), vzdrževanje (31 %) ter prekrivanje in mineralni agregati (asfaltiranje, označevanje cest, proizvodnja mineralnih agregatov – 11 %).
Tieliikelaitos provides services to the Finnish Road Administration (68 % of Tieliikelaitos’ turnover), commercial enterprises (15 %), municipalities and cities (13 %), other government agencies (2 %), etc.
Podjetje Tieliikelaitos zagotavlja storitve finski cestni upravi (68 % prometa podjetja Tieliikelaitos), trgovskim podjetjem (15 %), občinam in mestom (13 %) ter drugim vladnim službam (2 %).
Tieliikelaitos’ 2006 operating profit amounted to EUR 10,6 million. Its average number of employees stood at 2469 in 2006.
Dobiček iz poslovanja podjetja Tieliikelaitos je leta 2006 znašal 10,6 milijona EUR. Povprečno število zaposlenih je leta 2006 znašalo 2469.
Road services and ferry services reform in Finland
Reforma cestnih in trajektnih storitev na Finskem
Until the end of 2000, the maintenance of the Finnish network of State roads was carried out mainly by the Finnish Road Service.
Do konca leta 2000 je finsko omrežje državnih cest vzdrževala finska cestna služba.
The Road Service also partially carried out the design and the construction of new State roads.
Cestna služba je delno izvajala tudi načrtovanje in gradnjo novih državnih cest.
In this context it has to be mentioned that in Finland there are 78000 km of State roads, 26000 km of municipal streets and 350000 km of private (low grade) ‘forest’ roads.
Pri tem je treba omeniti, da je na Finskem 78000 km državnih cest, 26000 km občinskih cest in 350000 km zasebnih (nižje kategorije) gozdnih poti.
The Road Service was a State agency, which was responsible for managing and maintaining public roads and developing road traffic conditions and related service activities.
Cestna služba je bila državen organ, pristojen za upravljanje in vzdrževanje javnih cest ter za izboljšanje razmer v cestnem prometu ter z njimi povezanih storitev.
Under Finnish administrative law, a State agency is a department of the national administration, which does not have legal personality on its own, but which is part of the State.
Državna agencija je po finskem upravnem pravu oddelek državnega upravnega organa, ki ni samostojna pravna oseba, ampak del države.