natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Aerodrome service providers: organisations in charge of ground handling of aircraft, including fuelling, servicing, loadsheet preparation, loading, de-icing and towing at an aerodrome, as well as rescue and fire fighting, or other emergency services
Izvajalci letaliških storitev: organizacije, ki se ukvarjajo z zemeljsko oskrbo zrakoplovov, vključno z oskrbo z gorivom, servisiranjem, pripravo dokumentacije o obremenitvi in uravnoteženosti, natovarjanjem, razledenitvijo in vleko na letališču ter z reševanjem in gašenjem požarov ali drugimi storitvami ukrepanja ob nesrečah
Aviation training organisations
Organizacije za usposabljanje na področju letalstva
Third-country organisations: governmental aviation authorities and accident investigation bodies from third countries
Organizacije iz tretjih držav: državni letalski organi in organi za preiskovanje nesreč iz tretjih držav
International aviation organisations
Mednarodne organizacije na področju letalstva
Research: public or private research laboratories, centres or entities; or universities engaged in aviation safety research or studies
Raziskave: javni ali zasebni raziskovalni laboratoriji, centri in subjekti; ali univerze, ki sodelujejo pri raziskavah ali študijah o letalski varnosti.
List of interested parties which may receive information on the basis of a case by case decision in accordance with Articles 6(2) and 6(3)
Seznam zainteresiranih strank, ki lahko prejmejo informacije na podlagi odločitve za vsak primer posebej po členu 6(2) in 6(3)
Pilots (on personal basis)
Piloti (na osebno pobudo)
Air traffic controllers (on personal basis) and other ATM/ANS staff carrying out safety related tasks
Kontrolorji zračnega prometa (na osebno pobudo) ali drugo osebje ATM/ANS, ki izvaja naloge v zvezi z varnostjo
Engineers/technicians/air traffic safety electronics personnel/aviation (or aerodrome) managers (on personal basis)
Inženirji/tehniki/osebje, ki skrbi za varnostno elektroniko v zračnem prometu/managerji na področju letalstva (ali managerji, ki upravljajo z letališči) (na osebno pobudo)
Professional representative bodies of staff carrying out safety-related tasks
Strokovni predstavniški organi osebja, ki izvaja naloge v zvezi z varnostjo.
REQUEST FOR DATA FROM EUROPEAN OCCURRENCES DATABASE
ZAHTEVEK ZA PRIDOBITEV PODATKOV IZ EVROPSKE PODATKOVNE BAZE O DOGODKIH
Function/position:
Funkcija/položaj:
Company:
Podjetje:
Nature of Business:
Poslovno področje:
Category of interested party you fall into (see Annex I of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1330/2007 of 24 September 2007 implementing Directive 2003/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2003 on occurrence reporting in civil aviation laying down measures for the dissemination to interested parties of information on civil aviation occurrences):
Kategorija zainteresirane stranke, v katero ste razvrščeni (glej Prilogo I k Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1330/2007 z dne 24. septembra 2007 o izvajanju Direktive 2003/42/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. junija 2003 o poročanju o dogodkih v civilnem letalstvu, ki določa ukrepe za razširjanje informacij o dogodkih v civilnem letalstvu zainteresiranim strankam):
Data requested (please be as specific as possible in your request, stating the relevant date/period over which you are interested):
Zahtevani podatki (prosimo, da čim podrobneje opišete svojo zahtevo in navedete zadevni datum/obdobje, ki vas zanima):
Reason for the request:
Razlog za vložitev zahtevka:
Explain the purpose the information will be used for:
Opis namena, za katerega bodo informacije uporabljene:
Date by which the data is requested:
Datum, do katerega se nanašajo zahtevani podatki:
Completed form should be sent, via e-mail, to: (point of contact)
Izpolnjen obrazec je treba poslati po e-pošti na naslov: (točka za stike)
Access to data:
Dostop do podatkov
The point of contact is not required to make available any requested data.
Točki za stike ni treba dati na voljo katerega koli od zahtevanih podatkov.
It may do so only if it is confident that the request is compatible with Directive 2003/42/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1330/2007.
To lahko naredi samo takrat, ko je povsem prepričana, da je zahtevek združljiv z Direktivo 2003/42/ES in Uredbo (ES) št. 1330/2007.
The requestor commits itself and its organisation to restrict the use of the data to the purpose it has described under point 4.
Vložnik zavezuje sebe in svojo organizacijo, da bo uporabo podatkov omejil na namen, ki ga je opisal pod točko 4.
It is also recalled that data provided on the basis of this request are made available only for the purposes of flight safety as provided in Directive 2003/42/EC and not for other purposes including attributing blame or liability or commercial purposes.
Treba je tudi opozoriti, da se podatki, posredovani na podlagi tega zahtevka, dajejo na voljo samo za potrebe varnosti letenja, kakor to določa Direktiva 2003/42/ES, in se ne dajejo za druge namene, vključno s pripisovanjem krivde ali odgovornosti ali za uporabo v komercialne namene.
The requestor is not allowed to disclose data provided to it to anyone without written consent of the provider.
Brez pisnega dovoljenja dobavitelja vložnik ne sme razkrivati podatkov, ki so mu bili posredovani.
Failure to meet the above requirements may lead to the denial of access to further information from the European occurrences database and to any sanction where applicable.
Zaradi neupoštevanja naštetih zahtev se lahko prepove dostop do nadaljnjih informacij iz Evropske podatkovne baze o dogodkih in uvede sankcije, kadar je to mogoče.
Date, place and signature:
Datum, kraj in podpis:
Council Regulation (EC) No 1331/2007
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1331/2007
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of dicyandiamide originating in the People’s Republic of China
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz diciandiamida s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 9 Uredbe,
On 3 July 2006 the Commission received a complaint lodged pursuant to Article 5 of the basic Regulation by AlzChem GmbH (‘the complainant’) representing 100 % of the Community production of 1-cyanoguanidine (dicyandiamide) (‘DCD’).
Komisija je 3. julija 2006 prejela pritožbo, ki jo je v skladu s členom 5 osnovne uredbe vložil AlzChem GmbH („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo 100 % proizvodnje 1-cianogvanidina (diciandiamida) („DCD“) Skupnosti.
This complaint contained evidence of dumping of DCD from the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’) and of material injury resulting there from which was considered sufficient to justify the opening of a proceeding.
Ta pritožba je vsebovala dokaze o dampingu DCD s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) in znatni škodi, ki je zaradi njega nastala, kar je zadostovalo za upravičenost začetka postopka.
On 17 August 2006 the proceeding was opened by the publication of a notice of initiation [2] in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Postopek se je začel 17. avgusta 2006 z objavo obvestila o začetku postopka [2] v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Parties concerned by the proceeding and verification visits
Stranke v postopku in preveritveni obiski
The Commission officially advised the complainant Community producer, the exporting producers, importers, users, suppliers and associations known to be concerned and the representatives of the exporting country concerned of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je pritožnika proizvajalca Skupnosti, proizvajalce izvoznike, uvoznike, uporabnike, dobavitelje in združenja, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter predstavnike zadevne države izvoznice uradno seznanila z začetkom postopka.
The complainant Community producer, exporting producers, importers and users made their views known.
Pritožnik proizvajalec Skupnosti, proizvajalci izvozniki, uvozniki in uporabniki so izrazili svoja stališča.
In order to allow exporting producers in the PRC to submit a claim for market economy treatment (‘MET’) or individual treatment (‘IT’), if they so wished, the Commission sent claim forms to the Chinese exporting producers known to be concerned.
Da bi proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK lahko predložili zahtevek za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo („TGO“) ali individualno obravnavo („IO“), če tako želijo, je Komisija kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, poslala obrazce za zahtevek.
Three exporting producers in the PRC requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation and IT, should the investigation establish that they do not meet the conditions for MET.
Trije proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK so vložili zahtevek za TGO v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe ali IO, če bi preiskava pokazala, da ne izpolnjujejo pogojev za TGO.
In view of the apparent high number of exporting producers in the PRC, in the notice of initiation the Commission indicated that sampling might be applied in this investigation for the determination of dumping in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je glede na očitno veliko število proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK v obvestilu o začetku navedla, da bo morda v tej preiskavi za ugotovitev dampinga v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe uporabila vzorčenje.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, all exporting producers in the PRC were asked to make themselves known to the Commission and provide, as specified in the notice of initiation, basic information on their activities related to the product concerned during the investigation period (1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006).
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, so bili vsi proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK pozvani, naj se javijo Komisiji in predložijo osnovne informacije o svojih dejavnostih, povezanih z zadevnim izdelkom med obdobjem preiskave (1. julij 2005 do 30. junij 2006), kot je določeno v obvestilu o začetku.
However, given that only three exporting producers cooperated in the investigation, it was decided that sampling was not required.
Ker so v preiskavi sodelovali samo trije proizvajalci izvozniki, je bilo sklenjeno, da vzorčenje ni potrebno.
Replies were received from the three cooperating exporting producers in the PRC and from the sole Community producer, as well as from two users and four importers.
Prejeti so bili izpolnjeni vprašalniki od treh sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK, edinega proizvajalca Skupnosti in dveh uporabnikov ter štirih uvoznikov.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for the determination of dumping, resulting injury and Community interest and carried out verifications at the premises of the following companies:
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, potrebne za ugotovitev dampinga, posledične škode in interesa Skupnosti, ter izvedla preveritvene obiske v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Community producer
Proizvajalec Skupnosti
AlzChem GmbH, Germany,
AlzChem GmbH, Nemčija
Ningxia Darong Chemical & Metallurgy Co., Ltd., PRC,
Ningxia Darong Chemical & Metallurgy Co., Ltd., LRK
Ningxia Xingping Fine Chemical Co., Ltd., PRC,
Ningxia Xingping Fine Chemical Co., Ltd., LRK
Ningxia Yinglite Chemicals Co., Ltd, PRC,
Ningxia Yinglite Chemicals Co., Ltd., LRK
Lanxess GmbH, Germany,
Lanxess GmbH, Nemčija
Helm AG, Germany,
Helm AG, Nemčija
Merck Santé, France,
Merck Santé, Francija
Lanxess GmbH, Germany.
Lanxess GmbH, Nemčija
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006 (‘investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. julija 2005 do 30. junija 2006 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2002 to the end of the investigation period (‘period considered’).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2002 do konca obdobja preiskave („obravnavano obdobje“).
The product concerned is 1-cyanoguanidine (dicyandiamide) (‘DCD’), falling within CN code 29262000.
Zadevni izdelek je 1-cianogvanidin (diciandiamid) („DCD“), uvrščen pod oznako KN 29262000.
It is a solid substance in the form of a fine, white, crystalline powder, usually odourless.
Je trdna snov v obliki drobnega, belega kristalinčnega praha, običajno brez vonja.
It is produced from quick lime and carbon black, and appears after several production steps.
Proizveden je iz živega apna in ogljenih saj in v več proizvodnih korakih.
DCD is usually used as an intermediate to produce a broad range of other chemical intermediates, such as pharmaceuticals, various industrial applications — water, pulp and paper, textile, leather — and diverse fields of epoxy applications.
DCD se običajno uporablja kot vmesni izdelek za proizvodnjo širokega spektra drugih kemijskih vmesnih izdelkov, kot so farmacevtski izdelki, za različne uporabe v industriji – voda, pulpa in papir, tekstil, usnje – in različna področja uporabe epoksija.
It is a key element of the nitrogen — carbon — nitrogen (NCN) chain, with niche end-products such as guanidine nitrate and other NCN derivatives.
Je bistven element verige dušik-ogljik-dušik (NCN), z nišnimi končnimi izdelki, kot so gvanidin nitrat in drugi derivati NCN.
More than 90 % of the DCD sold on the Community market is standard.
Več kot 90 % DCD, ki je prodan na trgu Skupnosti, je standardnega.
The rest, so-called micro DCD, is of a smaller particle size.
Ostalo je tako imenovani mikro DCD, ki ima manjše delce.
The Chinese exporting producers provided data for the standard type only.
Kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki so predložili samo podatke za standardni tip.
One importer argued that the standard type of DCD produced by the Community industry is of higher quality than that produced by the Chinese exporting producers, since the water content of the Chinese DCD is significantly higher and more volatile compared to the water content of the DCD produced in the Community.
En uvoznik je trdil, da je standardna vrsta DCD, ki jo proizvaja industrija Skupnosti, boljše kakovosti, kot tista, ki jo proizvajajo kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, ker je vsebnost vode v kitajskem DCD znatno večja in bolj spremenljiva v primerjavi z vsebnostjo vode DCD, proizvedenega v Skupnosti.
Allegedly, the Chinese DCD also has a higher content of impurities.
Domnevno ima kitajski DCD tudi večjo vsebnost nečistoč.
The investigation showed, however, that while there may be certain quality differences, these cannot be quantified and moreover, do not affect the basic chemical, physical and technical characteristics of DCD produced and sold by the Community industry in the Community, and DCD imported into the Community from the PRC, which were found to be the same and to have the same end-uses.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da sicer lahko obstajajo določene razlike v kakovosti, ki jih ni mogoče količinsko opredeliti, vendar te ne vplivajo na osnovne kemijske, fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti DCD, ki ga industrija Skupnosti proizvaja in prodaja na trgu Skupnosti, ter DCD, uvoženim v Skupnost iz LRK, za katera je bilo ugotovljeno, da sta enaka in imata enako končno uporabo.
It was therefore concluded that these products are alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da sta si ta izdelka podobna v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of the said Article for those producers which were found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe se v protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz LRK normalna vrednost določi v skladu z odstavki 1 do 6 navedenega člena za tiste proizvajalce, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
Three exporting producers in the PRC requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation and replied to the MET claim form for exporting producers within the given deadline.
Trije proizvajalci izvozniki iz LRK so zahtevali TGO v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe in so v danem roku izpolnili obrazec zahtevka za TGO za proizvajalce izvoznike.
The Commission sought and verified at the premises of these companies all necessary information submitted in the MET applications as deemed necessary.
Komisija je v prostorih teh družb poiskala in preverila vse potrebne informacije, navedene v zahtevkih za TGO, za katere je menila, da je to potrebno.
The investigation revealed that the MET claim had to be rejected for all three exporting producers.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je bilo treba zahtevek za TGO zavrniti za vse tri proizvajalce izvoznike.
The determination for the companies against each of the five criteria set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation showed that the companies did not meet the requirements of criteria one, two and three.
Obravnava družb na podlagi petih meril, določenih v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, je pokazala, da družbe ne izpolnjujejo zahtev meril ena, dve in tri.
As the main shareholder is in one case a State-owned enterprise and in the second a member of the People’s Congress, it was found that the State could exert significant influence over the companies’ business decisions relating to management decisions such as profit distribution, the issuing of new shares, capital increases and the amendment of the Articles of Association, therefore such decisions were not made in response to market signals.
Ker je v enem primeru glavni delničar podjetje v državni lasti, v drugem pa član Narodnega kongresa, je bilo ugotovljeno, da bi država lahko v veliki meri uveljavljala svoj vpliv na poslovne odločitve družbe glede vsakodnevnega upravljanja ter razdeljevanje dobička, izdajanja novih delnic, večanja kapitala, spreminjanja statuta in da zato take odločitve ne bi bile sprejete kot odziv na tržne razmere.
Significant differences in the electricity unit consumption and unit price between the three companies were found and none of the three companies could demonstrate that its electricity costs are the result of supply and demand, and that they substantially reflect market values.
Ugotovljene so bile znatne razlike v porabi električne energije na enoto in ceni na enoto med tremi družbami, nobena od treh družb pa ni mogla dokazati, da so njeni stroški električne energije rezultat ponudbe in povpraševanja ter da v glavnem odražajo tržne vrednosti.
Furthermore, in all three cases, the companies’ accounts failed to reflect the true financial situation.
Poleg tega računovodske evidence niso odražale dejanskega finančnega stanja v nobeni od treh družb.
In particular, there were numerous breaches of basic accounting principles which are part of the International Accounting Standards (IAS) and as none of these issues were mentioned in the auditor’s report, the companies cannot be considered to have one clear set of accounts in line with IAS and to be independently audited in line with IAS.
Predvsem so bile ugotovljene številne kršitve osnovnih računovodskih načel, ki so del mednarodnih računovodskih standardov (MRS), in ker nobeden od teh problemov ni bil naveden v revizijskem poročilu, se šteje, da družbe nimajo preglednih računov v skladu z IAS in bi jih bilo treba neodvisno revidirati v skladu z IAS.
As to the valuation of initial assets, the three companies were unable to provide any explanation of the basis on which such valuation was made.
Glede na vrednotenje začetnih sredstev nobena od treh družb ni mogla zagotoviti kakršnih koli pojasnil o osnovi, na kateri je bila ta ocena opravljena.
Finally, in two cases, the companies were unable to provide proof of all payments for land-use rights.
Dve družbi pa nista mogli zagotoviti dokazov o plačilu pravic do rabe zemljišča.
Both deficiencies indicated that there were significant distortions carried over from the non-market economy system.
Obe nepravilnosti kažeta na znatna izkrivljanja, prenesena iz sistema netržnega gospodarstva.
The Community industry and the three exporting producers all received disclosure of the MET assessment and were given the opportunity to comment.
Industrija Skupnosti in vsi trije proizvajalci izvozniki so prejeli razkritje ocene v zvezi s TGO in so imeli možnost predložiti pripombe.
The exporting producers made a number of comments against the findings and the Commission replied to them without, however, amending the overall assessment.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je na ugotovitve predložil številne pripombe in Komisija je nanje odgovorila, ne da bi spremenila skupno oceno.
The exporting producers claimed in particular that their business decisions were free of State intervention.
Proizvajalci izvozniki so trdili zlasti, da so bile njihove poslovne odločitve sprejete brez vmešavanja države.
Furthermore, they objected to specific findings concerning costs and evaluation of assets.
Poleg tega so nasprotovali ugotovitvam glede stroškov in oceni sredstev.
However, no evidence was submitted to substantiate the claims, which had therefore to be rejected.
Vendar pa ni bilo predloženega nobenega dokaza za utemeljitev teh trditev, zato so bile te zavrnjene.
Following the above, it was concluded that MET should not be granted to the PRC producers.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je bilo sklenjeno, da se TGO proizvajalcem izvoznikom iz LRK ne odobri.
Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation provides that, where Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation applies, an individual duty shall be specified for companies that are able to demonstrate that they meet all criteria set out in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation for receiving individual treatment.
Člen 9(5) osnovne uredbe določa, da se v primerih iz člena 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe za družbe, ki dokažejo, da izpolnjujejo vsa merila za individualno obravnavo, določena v členu 9(5) osnovne uredbe, določi individualna dajatev.
The PRC producers to which MET could not be granted also claimed IT in the event that they were not granted MET.
Proizvajalci izvozniki iz LRK, ki jim TGO ni bilo mogoče odobriti, so za primer, če jim TGO ne bi bil odobren, zahtevali tudi IO.
However, the State was found to exert significant influence in such a way that, in two cases, company decisions could not be considered to be taken freely and State interference could be such that there would be a high risk of circumvention.
Vendar je bilo ugotovljeno, da je v dveh primerih država imela znaten vpliv, zato odločitve družbe niso bile svobodne, državno vmešavanje pa bi lahko pomenilo veliko tveganje izogibanja.
As far as the third, collectively-owned, former State-owned company is concerned, there are strong indications that there is still substantial potential interference from the State leading to possible risks of circumvention.
Glede tretje družbe, ki je v skupni lasti, nekdanje državne družbe, so na voljo tehtni dokazi, da še vedno obstajajo možnosti, ki zajemajo vse od znatnega vmešavanja državnega vodstva do možnega tveganja izogibanja.
The latter exporting producer claimed that potential State interference would not be sufficient reason to reject individual treatment because such conclusion would be merely based on assumptions.
Slednji proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da potencialno državno vmešavanje ne bi bil zadosten razlog za zavrnitev individualne obravnave, ker bi taki sklepi temeljili samo na domnevah.