natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Xinhui Alida Polythene Limited, Xinhui, China,
Xinhui Alida Polythene Limited, Xinhui, Kitajska,
British Polythene Industries plc, Stockton-on-Tees, United Kingdom,
British Polythene Industries plc, Stockton-on-Tees, Združeno kraljestvo,
Thai Plastic Bags Industries Co., Ltd, Nakonpathom, Thailand,
Thai Plastic Bags Industries Co., Ltd, Nakonpathom, Tajska,
Thai Griptech Co., Ltd, Samae-Dum, Bangkok, Thailand,
Thai Griptech Co., Ltd, Samae-Dum, Bangkok, Tajska,
Sahachit Watana Co., Ltd, Nongkaem, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sahachit Watana Co., Ltd, Nongkaem, Bangkok, Tajska.
The investigation of dumping covered the period from 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006 (the review investigation period or RIP).
Preiskava je zajela obdobje od 1. julija 2005 do 30. junija 2006 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“).
The product concerned by the current review is the same as that in the original investigation, i.e. plastic sacks and bags, containing at least 20 % by weight of polyethylene and of sheeting of a thickness not exceeding 100 micrometres (μm); originating in the PRC; and currently classifiable within CN codes ex39232100, ex39232910 and ex39232990 (TARIC codes 3923210020, 3923291020 and 3923299020).
Izdelek, ki je predmet trenutnega pregleda, je enak kot izdelek iz prvotne preiskave, tj. vreče in vrečke iz plastičnih mas, ki vsebujejo najmanj 20 mas. % polietilena, katerih debelina plasti ne presega 100 mikrometrov (μm), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznake KN ex39232100, ex39232910 in ex39232990 (oznake TARIC 3923210020, 3923291020 in 3923299020).
The current review has shown that Xinhui Alida made no sales on the Chinese domestic market and therefore no like product was produced.
Sedanji pregled je pokazal, da družba Xinhui Alida ni izvajala prodaje na kitajskem domačem trgu, zato ni bil proizveden noben podobni izdelek.
MARKET ECONOMY TREATMENT (MET)
TRŽNOGOSPODARSKA OBRAVNAVA („TGO“)
In all anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC, normal value for exporting producers found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of Article 2 of the basic Regulation.
Pri protidampinških preiskavah glede uvoza s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske se normalna vrednost za tiste proizvajalce izvoznike, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 2(7)(c), določi v skladu z odstavki 1 do 6 člena 2 osnovne uredbe.
business decisions and costs are made in response to market conditions and without significant State interference,
poslovne odločitve in stroški temeljijo na tržnih pogojih, brez večjega vmešavanja države,
accounting records are independently audited, in line with international accounting standards and applied for all purposes,
računovodska dokumentacija se revidira neodvisno v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi in uporablja v vse namene,
there are no significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system,
ni večjih izkrivljanj, ki bi se prenesla iz prejšnjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva,
legal certainty and stability is provided by bankruptcy and property laws,
stečajno pravo in pravo lastninskih razmerij zagotavljata pravno varnost in stabilnost,
currency exchanges are carried out at the market rate.
menjave valute se izvajajo po tržni obrestni meri.
The Commission’s services concluded that Xinhui Alida demonstrated that they fulfilled the five criteria of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, and proposed therefore that they be granted MET.
Službe Komisije so sklenile, da je družba Xinhui Alida pokazala, da izpolnjuje pet kriterijev člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, ter predlagale, da se ji TGO odobri.
Both Xinhui Alida and the Community industry were given an opportunity to comment on the above findings.
Xinhui Alida in industriji Skupnosti je bila dana možnost, da predložita pripombe na navedene ugotovitve.
The Community industry contested the granting of MET to Xinhui Alida, stating that the governance of the company was unclear and that the company had destroyed certain documents required for them to prove their eligibility for MET.
Industrija Skupnosti je ugovarjala odobritvi TGO za Xinhui Alida in pri tem navedla, da je upravljanje družbe nejasno in da je družba uničila nekatere dokumente, ki so pomembni kot dokaz za primernost družbe za TGO.
The Articles of Association of the company provide for the nomination of directors by the shareholders in proportion to their shareholding in Xinhui Alida, but, at present, the two shareholders appoint the same number of directors, despite not having the same number of shares.
Statut družbe določa, da delničarji imenujejo direktorje glede na svoj delež v Xinhui Alida, toda trenutno oba delničarja imenujeta enako število direktorjev, kljub temu, da nimata istega števila delnic.
This does not, however, make the governance of the company unclear.
Vendar upravljanje družbe ni nejasno zaradi tega.
The smaller shareholder is majority-owned by the larger one, thus the composition of the Board of Directors reflects the actual ownership of Xinhui Alida.
Večji delničar je večinski lastnik manjšega, tako da sestava upravnega odbora odraža dejansko lastništvo Xinhui Alida.
In addition, it was argued that the company was unable to provide original bank transfer slips for the original payment of capital, the payment of the land use right, and the payment to the State for their shareholding when the company became entirely privately owned, since it is not company policy to retain documents for more than seven years.
Poleg tega se je trdilo, da družba ni predložila izvirnih izpiskov bančnih nakazil za izvirno plačilo kapitala, plačilo pravice do rabe zemljišča in plačilo državi za njihove deleže, ko je družba v celoti postala družba v zasebni lasti, ker družba v skladu s svojo politiko dokumentov ne shranjuje več kot 7 let.
However, the company was able to provide evidence from audited sources regarding these transactions and, given the passage of time since they took place, the absence of the original bank transfer slips was not considered exceptional.
Vendar je družba v zvezi s temi nakazili predložila dokaze iz revidiranih virov, zato odsotnost izvirnih izpiskov bančnih nakazil glede na pretečeni čas od njihove izvedbe ni bila obravnavana kot izjemna.
These arguments were considered, but, as no evidence was submitted to change the Commission’s decision to grant the company MET, the arguments of the Community industry were therefore rejected.
Ti argumenti so bili obravnavani, vendar niso bili predloženi dokazi, ki bi spremenili odločitev Komisije, da za družbo odobri TGO, zato so bili argumenti industrije Skupnosti zavrnjeni.
The Advisory Committee was consulted and the parties directly concerned were informed accordingly.
Posvetovanje je potekalo s svetovalnim odborom, neposredno vpletene stranke pa so bile o tem ustrezno obveščene.
The main arguments raised by the Community industry have already been addressed above.
Glavni argumenti, ki jih je izrazila industrija Skupnosti, so že bili obravnavani zgoraj.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, it was first examined whether the domestic sales of the like product to independent customers by the exporting producer were representative, i.e. whether the total volume of such sales was equal to or greater than 5 % of the total volume of the corresponding export sales to the Community.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe je bilo najprej preučeno, ali je bila domača prodaja podobnega izdelka izvoznika proizvajalca neodvisnim strankam reprezentativne, tj. ali je bil celoten obseg take prodaje enak ali večji od 5 % celotnega obsega ustreznega izvoza v Skupnost.
Given that Xinhui Alida had no domestic sales during the RIP the normal value of the company was constructed in accordance with Article 2(3) as described below.
Glede na to, da družba Xinhui Alida v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom ni izvajala domače prodaje, je bila normalna vrednost družbe konstruirana v skladu s členom 2(3), kot je opisano v nadaljnjem besedilu.
Given the absence of any domestic sales, normal value was constructed on the basis of the provisions of Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation by adding selling, general and administrative (SGA) expenses incurred and weighted average profit to the average manufacturing cost of Xinhui Alida during the RIP.
Glede na odsotnost domače prodaje je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana na podlagi določb iz člena 2(3) osnovne uredbe z dodajanjem prodajnih, splošnih in upravnih odhodkov in tehtanega povprečnega dobička k povprečnim proizvodnim stroškom družbe Xinhui Alida v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
Xinhui Alida claimed that their cost of manufacturing should be adjusted to take into account the difference in depreciation policy between them and their parent company in the United Kingdom, British Polythene Industries plc (‘BPI’) with whom their accounts are consolidated.
Družba Xinhui Alida je trdila, da je treba njene proizvodne stroške prilagoditi, tako da se upošteva razlika v amortizaciji med njo in njeno matično družbo v Združenem kraljestvu, British Polythene Industries plc („BPI“), s katero se konsolidira njena bilanca.
Xinhui Alida provided evidence to show that BPI adjusted the depreciation of their assets as part of the consolidation process and also claimed that the depreciation rates in China were fixed by law, thereby stopping the company from aligning their depreciation policies.
Xinhui Alida je predložila dokaze, da je družba BPI prilagodila amortizacijo sredstev kot del procesa konsolidiranja, ter prav tako trdila, da so amortizacijske stopnje na Kitajskem določene z zakonom, kar je družbi preprečilo uskladitev amortizacije.
This claim was rejected, partially because the law in China changed in 2001 and no longer fixes depreciation rates, and partially because the cost of manufacturing of Xinhui Alida for the RIP is that set out in their audited accounts, and not a cost adjusted to allow consolidation to take place in the United Kingdom.
Ta trditev je bila zavrnjena, deloma zato, ker se je zakon na Kitajskem leta 2001 spremenil in amortizacijske stopnje niso več določene, in deloma zato, ker so proizvodni stroški Xinhui Alida za obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom stroški iz njenih revidiranih računovodskih izkazov in ne stroški, prilagojeni zato, da se omogoči konsolidacija v Združenem kraljestvu.
Moreover, the assets concerned were also examined and found to be mainly still in use after 10 years.
Poleg tega so bila preučena tudi zadevna sredstva, pri čemer je bilo ugotovljeno, da se jih večina po 10 letih še vedno uporablja.
Xinhui Alida also claimed that the cost of raw materials should be adjusted to take account of the fact that part of the amount paid to their supplier, Horneman Chemplas (Far East) Limited, was in fact paid to their holding company Venture Hong Kong, which is part-owned by Horneman Chemplas and the remainder by British Polythene Industries plc (BPI).
Xinhui Alida je prav tako trdila, da je treba prilagoditi stroške surovin, da se upošteva dejstvo, da je bil del zneska, plačanega njenemu dobavitelju Horneman Chemplas (Far East) Limited, dejansko plačan njeni krovni družbi Venture Hong Kong, del katere je v lasti Horneman Chemplas, preostanek pa v lasti British Polythene Industries plc (BPI).
This claim was also rejected.
Ta trditev je bila prav tako zavrnjena.
Firstly, although Horneman Chemplas and Xinhui Alida are related parties, the price charged by Horneman Chemplas to Xinhui Alida was found to be a reasonable market price, including a small mark-up by Horneman on the price at which it had purchased the goods in order to cover its costs.
Prvič, čeprav sta Horneman Chemplas in Xinhui Alida povezani stranki, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila cena, ki jo je Xinhui Alida plačala Horneman Chemplas, razumna tržna cena, vključno z majhnim pribitkom, ki ga je družba Horneman za pokritje svojih stroškov dodala k ceni, za katero je kupila blago.
Moreover, the amounts were not paid straight back by Horneman to Xinhui Alida in the form of e.g. a volume rebate or credit notes, but to Venture Hong Kong which transferred them to Xinhui Alida as capital injection(s) and other payments.
Poleg tega družba Horneman zneskov ni plačala nazaj neposredno Xinhui Alida v obliki npr. količinskega rabata ali dobropisov, temveč družbi Venture Hong Kong, ki jih je prenesla na Xinhui Alida kot dokapitalizacijo in druga plačila.
They therefore can not be qualified as a standard price rebate granted by a seller to a buyer.
Zato se ne morejo obravnavati kot standardni rabat, ki ga prodajalec odobri kupcu.
The data for selling, general and administrative expenses and weighted average profit were taken from companies who responded to a questionnaire sent to companies in the analogue country as set out below.
Podatki o prodajnih, splošnih in upravnih odhodkih ter tehtanem povprečnem dobičku so bili zbrani od družb, ki so se odzvale na vprašalnik, poslan družbam v primerljivi državi, kot je navedeno v nadaljnjem besedilu.
Data from the analogue country was used to construct the normal value for Xinhui Alida given the absence of domestic sales, in line with the provisions of Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Podatki iz primerljive države so bili zaradi odsotnosti domače prodaje uporabljeni za konstruiranje normalne vrednosti za Xinhui Alida v skladu z določbami člena 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe.
The Notice of Initiation made provision for Malaysia to be the analogue country, but no companies agreed to cooperate with the investigation.
V obvestilu o začetku je bila za primerljivo državo določena Malezija, vendar se nobena družba ni strinjala s sodelovanjem pri preiskavi.
However, cooperation was received from three companies in Thailand who had domestic sales.
Sodelovale pa so tri družbe iz Tajske, ki so izvajale domačo prodajo.
Weighted average SGA and profit was calculated from data received from them and verified at their premises.
Tehtani povprečni prodajni, splošni in upravni odhodki ter dobiček so bili izračunani s pomočjo podatkov, dobljenih od teh družb in preverjenih v njihovih prostorih.
Whenever the exports of Xinhui Alida were made directly to independent customers in the Community, the export price was established on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable for the product concerned in the RIP in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Kadar je družba Xinhui Alida izvažala neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti, so bile izvozne cene določene na podlagi cen, ki so se dejansko plačale ali se plačujejo za zadevni izdelek v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
However, the vast majority of sales by Xinhui Alida were either to their related company in Hong Kong, Horneman Chemplas, for final onward sale to the Community, or to their related company in the United Kingdom, BPI, for final sale within the Community.
Vendar je Xinhui Alida svoje blago večinoma prodajala povezani družbi v Hongkongu, Horneman Chemplas, za končno nadaljnjo prodajo Skupnosti, ali povezani družbi v Združenem kraljestvu, BPI, za končno prodajo znotraj Skupnosti.
As regards these export sales to the Community, the export price was established on the basis of Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, i.e. using the resale prices actually paid or payable to the related company by the first independent buyer in the Community in the RIP adjusted for all costs incurred between importation and resale and for profits.
Za izvoz v Skupnost je bila izvozna cena določena na podlagi člena 2(9) osnovne uredbe, tj. z uporabo maloprodajnih cen, ki jih je prvi neodvisni kupec v Skupnosti dejansko plačal ali jih plačuje povezani družbi za obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom, prilagojenih za vse stroške, ki so nastali med uvozom in maloprodajo, ter za dobiček.
The comparison between the normal value and the export price was made on an ex-factory basis and at the same level of trade.
Primerjava med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno je bila izvedena na podlagi cene franko tovarna in na enaki ravni trgovine.
On this basis, allowances for differences in discounts, rebates, commissions, transport costs, insurance, handling charges, packaging, credit costs, bank charges and import duties were made where applicable and justified.
Na podlagi tega so bila po potrebi odobrena in utemeljena nadomestila za razlike v popustih, rabatih, provizijah, stroških prevoza, zavarovanju, manipulativnih stroških, stroških pakiranja, stroških kredita, bančnih stroških in uvoznih dajatvah.
As the related importer in the United Kingdom has functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis, an adjustment to the export price for a commission was made in accordance with Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation.
Ker ima povezani uvoznik v Združenem kraljestvu podobne funkcije kot zastopnik, ki dela na podlagi provizij, so bile provizije za izvozno ceno prilagojene v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) osnovne uredbe.
The level of the commission was calculated based on direct evidence pointing to the existence of a mark-up and selling expenses related to such functions.
Stopnja provizije je bila izračunana na podlagi neposrednih dokazov, ki so kazali na obstoj pribitka in prodajnih odhodkov, povezanih s takšnimi funkcijami.
As provided for under Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, the weighted average normal value by type was compared with the weighted average export price of the corresponding type of the product concerned.
V skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe je bila tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost glede na vrsto primerjana s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno ustrezne vrste zadevnega izdelka.
Xinhui Alida’s dumping margin expressed as a percentage of the net, free-a-Community-frontier price, duty unpaid, was found to be 4,3 %.
Stopnja dampinga za Xinhui Alida, izražena kot odstotek za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti, dajatev neplačana, je bila 4,3 %.
In accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, it was also examined whether the changed circumstances could reasonably be said to be of a lasting nature.
V skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe se je preučevalo tudi, ali se spremenjene okoliščine lahko obravnavajo kot trajne.
Firstly, it should be noted that the company was able to prove that it should be granted MET, and was therefore eligible for its own individual dumping margin.
Prvič, treba je poudariti, da je družba dokazala, da ji je treba odobriti TGO, zato je bila upravičena do lastne individualne stopnje dampinga.
The grounds on which they were granted MET are to be considered lasting as they refer to the long-term structure and business model of the company.
Razlogi za odobritev TGO za družbo se obravnavajo kot trajni, ker se nanašajo na dolgoročno strukturo in poslovni model družbe.
Secondly, information was requested regarding the evolution of product types and price fluctuation after the end of the RIP in June 2006.
Drugič, zahtevane so bile informacije v zvezi z razvojem vrst izdelkov in nihanjem cen po koncu obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom junija 2006.
The company provided evidence to show that raw material prices increased in the latter half of 2006, falling back to the end of 2006 but still above their level during the RIP.
Družba je predložila dokaze, da so se cene surovin zvišale v drugi polovici leta 2006 in se spet znižale ob koncu leta 2006, vendar so bile še vedno nad ravnjo iz obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
Given the parent company’s policy on transfer pricing between Xinhui Alida and themselves, it is clear that during the latter half of 2006 the transfer price remained stable whilst raw material prices rose substantially.
Glede na politiko matične družbe v zvezi s transferno ceno med Xinhui Alida in to družbo je jasno, da je transferna cena v drugi polovici leta 2006 ostala stabilna, medtem ko se je cena surovin znatno zvišala.
BPI have also demonstrated that their onward sales prices remained stable during the latter half of 2006, making the dumping margin calculated for the RIP clearly valid for the remainder of the calendar year 2006.
Družba BPI je prav tako pokazala, da so v drugi polovici leta 2006 cene nadaljnje prodaje ostale stabilne, zaradi česar je stopnja dampinga, izračunana za obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom, očitno veljavna za preostanek koledarskega leta 2006.
The company alleged that their sales pattern, both in terms of quantity and destination, changed in a lasting way since the original investigation period of April 2004 to March 2005.
Družba je prav tako trdila, da se je vzorec prodaje družbe v smislu količine in namembnega kraja trajno spremenil od prvotnega obdobja preiskave od aprila 2004 do marca 2005.
Evidence obtained during the investigation showed that the behaviour of the company, including the circumstances that led to the initiation of this review, were unlikely to change in the foreseeable future in a manner that would affect the findings of the current review.
Dokazi, pridobljeni med preiskavo, so pokazali, da se obnašanje družbe, vključno z okoliščinami, ki so privedle do začetka tega pregleda, v predvidljivi prihodnosti verjetno ne bo tako spremenilo, da bi vplivalo na ugotovitve iz sedanjega pregleda.
This would therefore suggest that the changes concerned were of a lasting nature and therefore the conclusions of the review were long-lasting.
To tako pomeni, da so zadevne spremembe trajne, zato so sklepi pregleda dolgotrajni.
In the light of the results of the investigation, it is considered appropriate to amend the anti-dumping duty applicable to imports of the product concerned from Xinhui Alida to 4,3 %.
Glede na rezultate preiskave se zdi primerno spremeniti protidampinško dajatev, ki se uporablja za uvoz zadevnega izdelka družbe Xinhui Alida, na 4,3 %.
Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend an amendment to Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 and were given an opportunity to comment.
Zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravalo priporočiti spremembo Uredbe (ES) št. 1425/2006, dana pa jim je bila možnost, da dajo pripombe.
The company contested the findings disclosed where various adjustments claimed by the company had been rejected, being the calculation of depreciation in China, the treatment of an exchange rate gain made in the United Kingdom and an alleged raw material rebate.
Družba je spodbijala razkrite ugotovitve, s katerimi so bile zavrnjene zahteve družbe po različnih spremembah, in sicer v zvezi z izračunom amortizacije na Kitajskem, obravnavo prihodkov od razlik v menjalnih tečajih v Združenem kraljestvu in domnevnem rabatu na surovine.
However, the company provided no new evidence to substantiate their claims and therefore these claims were again rejected.
Vendar družba ni predložila novih dokazov, s katerimi bi utemeljila svoje trditve, zato so bile te trditve ponovno zavrnjene.
The Community industry requested further information regarding the calculation of the constructed normal value using data from Thailand, but provided no evidence to dispute or contest the calculation or methodology used,
Industrija Skupnosti je zahtevala nadaljnje informacije v zvezi z izračunom konstruirane normalne vrednosti z uporabo podatkov iz Tajske, vendar ni predložila dokazov, s katerimi bi spodbijala izračun ali uporabljeno metodologijo –
The table in Article 1(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Preglednici iz člena 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1425/2006 se doda naslednje:
The list of companies in Annex I of Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 is hereby amended by removing the following:
Seznamu družb v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 1425/2006 se doda naslednje:
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1356/2007 (OJ L 304, 22.11.2007, p. 5).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1356/2007 (UL L 304, 22.11.2007, str. 5).
OJ C 54, 9.3.2007, p. 5.
UL C 54, 9.3.2007, str. 5.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 250/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 250/2008
This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 March 2008.
Ta uredba začne veljati 19. marca 2008.