natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Including those not subject to individual notification, the number of projects funded through the scheme in the period under assessment is well above 100.
Vključno s tistimi, ki jih ni treba individualno priglasiti, je število projektov, ki so se financirali prek programa v ocenjevalnem obdobju, precej nad 100.
Third, the fact that the lists include numerous military projects has increased the confusion.
Tretjič, dejstvo, da seznami vključujejo številne vojaške projekte, je povečalo zmedo.
The Commission notes that even in a report by the Italian Court of Auditors there was some confusion as to the nature of the projects.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je bilo celo v poročilu italijanskega računskega sodišča nekaj nejasnosti v zvezi z naravo projektov.
The information available on the projects supported was piecemeal and often confused, not least because the reporting from the Government itself to the Italian Parliament was in terms of a list of future projects rather than projects actually supported.
Informacije, ki so bile na voljo o posameznih podprtih projektih, so bile razdrobljene in pogosto nejasne, nenazadnje zato, ker je vlada italijanskemu parlamentu poročala v smislu seznama prihodnjih projektov in ne projektov, ki se dejansko podpirajo.
There are lists submitted by the anonymous third party, and others referred to directly by the Commission, such as the 13 projects specified in the first initiating decision and the list of projects cited in the second initiating decision.
Nekatere sezname je predložila anonimna tretja stranka, druge pa je neposredno navedla Komisija, kar velja za 13 projektov, določenih v prvi odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka, in seznam projektov, navedenih v drugi odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka.
The report of the Court of Auditors did not contain a list of the projects, but only overall figures, graphs and tables.
Poročilo računskega sodišča ni vsebovalo seznama projektov, temveč le skupne zneske, grafe in tabele.
However, the Word version of the document, available on the Courts website in 2005, allowed the underlying data to be extracted from the overall graphs.
Vendar je različica dokumenta v programu Word, ki je bila leta 2005 na voljo na spletni strani sodišča, omogočila pridobitev osnovnih podatkov iz skupnih grafov.
In its submission of 11 November 2005 the anonymous third party included these data.
Anonimna tretja stranka je 11. novembra 2005 predložila tudi te podatke.
In its request for information of 23 May 2006 the Commission referred to most of the projects entered on the list submitted by the anonymous third party to point out to Italy that in all likelihood there were still a number of non-notified projects on which Italy had not provided the requested information.
Komisija se je v svoji zahtevi po informacijah z dne 23. maja 2006 sklicevala na večino projektov, navedenih na seznamu, ki ga je predložila anonimna tretja stranka, da je Italijo opozorila na to, da je zelo verjetno še veliko nepriglašenih projektov, o katerih Italija ni zagotovila potrebnih informacij.
Italy denied that the list could be attributed to the Court of Auditors: it had been derived from the information system of the Court by a person unknown.
Italija je zanikala, da bi seznam lahko pripisali računskemu sodišču: iz informacijskega sistema sodišča ga je pridobila neznana oseba.
It would be misleading, therefore, to attribute the list to the Court itself, since it was the result of manipulation of data by a third party.
Zato bi bilo zavajajoče, če bi seznam pripisali sodišču, ker ga je z manipulacijo podatkov naredila tretja stranka.
It contained a number of errors and inaccuracies, and it would be wrong to imagine that the Court of Auditors itself was responsible for it.
Vseboval je številne napake in nenatančne podatke in napačno bi bilo meniti, da je bilo zanj odgovorno računsko sodišče.
Ultimately Italy decided that it would itself provide a complete list of individual projects that were subject to individual notification, so that it is not necessary for the Commission to state a view on the accuracy of the information received previously.
Končno se je Italija odločila, da bo zagotovila celoten seznam posameznih projektov, ki so bili predmet individualne priglasitve, tako da Komisiji ni treba izraziti stališča o točnosti predhodno prejetih informacij.
The discussion on the list of non-notified projects was difficult, but after about two years, it enabled the Italian authorities and the Commission to identify a number of individual projects that Italy had failed to notify.
Razprava o seznamu nepriglašenih projektov je bila težka, vendar so po približno dveh letih italijanski organi in Komisija lahko opredelili številne individualne projekte, ki jih Italija ni priglasila.
As requested in the second initiating decision, Italy also provided a list of the projects below the thresholds for individual notification that had been approved after 20 November 2002.
Kot je bilo zahtevano v drugi odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka, je Italija zagotovila tudi seznam projektov pod pragom za individualno priglasitev, ki je bil potrjen po 20. novembru 2002.
The Commission finds that that list matches the overall budget for Law No 808/1985 in the period concerned, and that it does refer to projects below the thresholds for individual assessment.
Komisija meni, da seznam ustreza skupnemu proračunu za Zakon št. 808/1985 v zadevnem obdobju in da se sklicuje na projekte pod pragom za individualno oceno.
Assessment of the final list of civilian projects
Ocena končnega seznama civilnih projektov
The list of projects that Italy failed to notify individually to the Commission contains 17 projects.
Seznam projektov, ki jih Italija ni individualno priglasila Komisiji, vsebuje 17 projektov.
The list comprises the projects on which the Commission is able to reach a final conclusion regarding compatibility with the Treaty, but that leaves open the possibility that the Commission may in future take measures in respect of other projects that have not been notified and of which it is not currently aware, or projects of which it is aware but for which it does not possess information sufficient for purposes of a decision, either because the information available is not complete or because the information indicates that the project is currently below the threshold for notification, whereas fresh information may modify this assessment.
Seznam zajema projekte, v zvezi s katerimi lahko Komisija sprejme končni sklep glede združljivosti s Pogodbo, vendar to dopušča možnost, da lahko Komisija v prihodnosti sprejme ukrepe v zvezi z drugimi projekti, ki niso bili priglašeni in jih zdaj še ne pozna, ali ukrepi, ki jih pozna, vendar o njih nima dovolj informacij za oblikovanje sklepa, ker so razpoložljive informacije nepopolne ali ker je na podlagi informacij jasno, da je projekt trenutno pod pragom za priglasitev, pri čemer lahko nove informacije to oceno spremenijo.
For each project the Commission has the initial schedule for disbursement and reimbursement laid down at the time the aid was granted and the real figures for payments by the State and reimbursement by the recipients.
Komisiji so za vsak projekt znani prvotni časovni razporedi za izplačila in vračila, ki so bili določeni v času dodelitve pomoči, ter dejanski zneski plačil s strani države in vračil s strani prejemnikov.
The schedules incorporate the corrections imposed by the methodology described above.
Časovni razporedi vključujejo popravke zaradi opisane metodologije.
On the basis of the information available on the projects, and bearing in mind that all the projects are individual applications of the same aid scheme, the Commission has no evidence that would lead it to suspect that the aid was aimed at supporting activities that did not qualify as R & D activities under the R & D frameworks.
Na podlagi informacij, ki so na voljo o projektih, in ob upoštevanju, da gre pri vseh projektih za individualno pomoč istega programa pomoči, Komisija nima dokazov, na podlagi katerih bi lahko sklepala, da je bila pomoč namenjena za podporne dejavnosti, ki niso izpolnjevale pogojev za raziskovalne in razvojne dejavnosti v skladu z okviri za raziskave in razvoj.
As regards the incentive effect, the Commission would note, first of all, that point 8.2 of the 1986 Framework required only that the aid should encourage additional effort in the field of R & D or enable the recipients to respond to exceptional conditions for which their own resources were too limited.
V zvezi s spodbujevalnim učinkom Komisija najprej ugotavlja, da točka 8.2 Okvira iz leta 1986 zahteva le, da mora pomoč spodbujati dodatno prizadevanje na področju raziskav in razvoja ali omogočiti prejemnikom, da se odzovejo na izjemne razmere, za katere so njihova lastna sredstva preveč omejena.
In point 6 of the 1996 Framework, the incentive effect was to be verified on the basis of quantifiable factors, or other relevant factors indicated by the Member State, showing that the same R & D project would not have taken place without the aid, or that it would have been less ambitious, or that it would not have been carried out at the same pace.
V skladu s točko 6 Okvira iz leta 1996 je treba spodbujevalni učinek preveriti na podlagi izmerljivih dejavnikov ali drugih ustreznih dejavnikov, ki jih določi država članica, pri čemer naj bi ti pokazali, da enak projekt za raziskave in razvoj ne bi bil mogoč brez pomoči ali bi bil manj ambiciozen ali se ne bi izvajal enako hitro.
The Commission has no reason to doubt the incentive effect of the aid under assessment.
Komisija nima razloga za pomisleke glede spodbujevalnega učinka pomoči, ki se ocenjuje.
The aid allowed the recipients to engage in R & D activities additional to their normal research, and to undertake R & D projects they would not have been able to undertake alone.
Pomoč je prejemnikom omogočila, da izvajajo raziskovalne in razvojne dejavnosti poleg svojih običajnih raziskav ter da izvajajo projekte za raziskave in razvoj, ki jih sicer ne bi mogli.
Furthermore, consistently with its assessment of similar projects in the aeronautical industry, the Commission finds that the aid to the projects under assessment allowed the recipients to engage in risky projects which they would not have been able to finance alone.
Poleg tega Komisija glede na svojo oceno podobnih projektov v letalski industriji ugotavlja, da je pomoč za projekte, ki se ocenjujejo, prejemnikom omogočila, da izvajajo tvegane projekte, ki jih sami ne bi mogli financirati.
Finally, the Commission notes that most of the projects were international projects that required additional collaborative efforts.
Končno Komisija ugotavlja, da je bila večina projektov mednarodnih, za kar je potrebno dodatno sodelovanje.
Each project is described below with its overall eligible costs and the amount of aid received.
Za vse projekte so v nadaljevanju navedeni skupni upravičeni stroški in znesek prejete pomoči.
For the six projects regarding which the first initiating decision expressed doubts, the assessment also covers the information available on the eligible activities and the incentive effect.
Za šest projektov, v zvezi s katerimi so bili v prvi odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka izraženi pomisleki, ocena zajema tudi razpoložljive informacije o dejavnostih, ki so upravičene do pomoči, in spodbujevalnem učinku.
For all the projects the consequences of the application of the methodology are detailed in recital 257.
Za vse projekte so posledice uporabe metodologije podrobno navedene v uvodni izjavi 257.
List of projects to which this Decision relates
Seznam projektov, na katere se nanaša ta odločba
Aero structure
sestavni deli zrakoplovov
1988 to 1994 (5 projects)
1988 do 1994 (5 projektov)
Cabins
Kabine
D/E/F project carried out by Agusta
Projekt A109 D/E/F, ki ga je izvajala družba Agusta
The project concerned a helicopter, and was carried out by Agusta; it consisted in the development of different versions of the A109, adapting it to different engines in order to satisfy the most stringent criteria in terms of security, flight performance and environmental impact.
Projekt je zadeval helikopter, izvajala pa ga je družba Agusta; vključeval je razvoj več različic A109 za prilagoditev različnim motorjem, da bi izpolnjeval najstrožja merila v smislu varnosti, delovanja med poletom in vpliva na okolje.
The D, E and F versions corresponded to engines provided by Allison, Pratt & Whitney and Turbomeca.
Različice D, E in F so ustrezale motorjem, ki so jih dobavile družbe Allison, Pratt & Whitney in Turbomeca.
The D and E versions, according to Italy, were never developed.
Različici D in E po navedbah Italije nista bili nikoli razviti.
The project was listed in the first initiating decision as project No 4.
Projekt je bil v prvi odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka naveden kot projekt št. 4.
Investments were carried out in the period 1996 to 1998.
Naložbe so se izvajale v obdobju 1996–1998.
In the first initiating decision the Commission expressed doubts regarding the classification of R & D activities and the incentive effect.
Komisija je v prvi odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka izrazila pomisleke o razvrstitvi raziskovalnih in razvojnih dejavnosti ter spodbujevalnem učinku.
As regards the R & D activities, the Italian authorities have provided more detailed information on the work packages.
V zvezi z raziskovalnimi in razvojnimi dejavnostmi so italijanski organi predložili podrobnejše informacije o delovnih paketih.
The Commission would observe, first, that several prototypes were developed, and that the D and E versions were not completed or marketed.
Komisija ugotavlja, prvič, da je bilo razvitih več prototipov ter da različici D in E nista bili dokončani ali trženi.
Second, the Commission notes that the technologies more directly concerned — new engine and skids — were certified only in June 2001.
Drugič, Komisija ugotavlja, da so bile tehnologije, ki jih postopek bolj neposredno zadeva, – nov motor in sanišča – certificirane šele junija 2001.
According to Italy, the developments in the rotor still have to be incorporated into the final product, even though the result of the R & D was successful.
Po navedbah Italije je treba razvoj rotorja vseeno vključiti v končni izdelek, čeprav je bil rezultat raziskav in razvoja uspešen.
The sequence of events would seem to indicate that the aid for the R & D project carried out in the period 1996-1998 enabled Agusta to introduce new technologies, with a time horizon of more than 30 months.
Zaporedje dogodkov kaže, da je pomoč za projekt za raziskave in razvoj, izveden v obdobju 1996–1998, družbi Agusta omogočila uvedbo novih tehnologij v obdobju več kot 30 mesecev.
The aid consequently had an incentive effect on Agusta.
Zato je imela pomoč za družbo Agusta spodbujevalni učinek.
The eligible investment was ITL 69790 million.
Upravičene naložbe so bile 69790 milijonov ITL.
The amount of aid in the form of interest forgone by the State was ITL 24450 million.
Znesek pomoči v obliki obresti, ki se jim odreče država, je bil 24450 milijonov ITL.
Thus, the initial aid intensity was 35,03 %, as compared with a theoretical maximum intensity of 31 % allowed by the 1996 Framework.
Tako je bila začetna intenzivnost pomoči 35,03 %, v primerjavi s teoretično največjo intenzivnostjo 31 %, ki je dovoljena v skladu z Okvirom iz leta 1996.
The year in which the cumulative intensity reached the maximum 31 % allowed was 2004.
Skupna intenzivnost je dovoljeno največjo vrednost 31 % dosegla leta 2004.
In 2007, therefore, Agusta has immediately to repay the outstanding principal (ITL 19300 million) plus the ITL 7811 million called for in the reimbursement schedule for the year.
Zato je leta 2007 družba Agusta morala takoj odplačati neporavnano glavnico (19300 milijonov ITL) skupaj s 7811 milijoni ITL, zahtevanih v odplačilnem roku.
Interest has also to be paid from 2005 onwards, amounting on 31 December 2007 to ITL […] million.
Od leta 2005 naprej je bilo treba plačevati tudi obresti, ki so 31. decembra 2007 znašale […] milijonov ITL.
The Commission concludes, therefore, that the aid can be considered compatible under the 1996 Framework, since it concerned R & D activities and had an incentive effect on Agusta, on the condition that Agusta immediately reimburses the outstanding principal and the compound interest.
Zato Komisija ugotavlja, da se lahko pomoč šteje za združljivo z Okvirom iz leta 1996, ker je zadevala raziskovalne in razvojne dejavnosti ter je imela spodbujevalni učinek za družbo Agusta, pod pogojem, da družba Agusta takoj vrne neporavnano glavnico in obrestne obresti.
X project carried out by Agusta
Projekt A109 X, ki ga je izvajala družba Agusta
The project concerned an Agusta helicopter.
Projekt je zadeval helikopter družbe Agusta.
It was listed in the first initiating decision as project No 2.
V prvi odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka je bil naveden kot projekt št. 2.
The Commission expressed doubts regarding the classification of R & D activities and the incentive effect.
Komisija je izrazila pomisleke o razvrstitvi raziskovalnih in razvojnih dejavnosti ter spodbujevalnem učinku.
According to Italy, the project, carried out in the period 1999-2001, aimed at developing an entirely new helicopter, to enter the market after 2009.
Po navedbah Italije je bil cilj projekta, izvedenega v obdobju 1999–2001, razvoj povsem novega helikopterja, ki bi bil dan na trg po letu 2009.
The helicopter would be in the range between 3 and 3,5 tonnes, and would also be used for developments in the military market.
Helikopter bi imel maso med 3 in 3,5 tonami ter bi se uporabljal tudi za razvoj na vojaškem trgu.
Italy was able to demonstrate that the A109 X was a project totally different from the A109 D/E/F, A109 Power and A119 Koala.
Italija je lahko dokazala, da je bil projekt A109 X povsem drugačen od projektov A109 D/E/F, A109 Power in A119 Koala.
The main technological differences related to the five-blade rotor, the tail rotor, and the transmission using face gears.
Glavna tehnološka razlika je zadevala petkraki rotor, repni rotor in prenos moči z valjastimi zobniki.
On the incentive effect, Italy was able to show that the A109 X was a new project, which would not be finalised before 2009.
V zvezi s spodbujevalnim učinkom je Italija lahko dokazala, da je bil A109 X nov projekt, ki ne bi bil končan pred letom 2009.
The aid thus enabled Agusta to engage in R & D activities which were very distant from the market and were very risky from a technological point of view.
Pomoč je družbi Agusta tako omogočila, da izvaja raziskovalne in razvojne dejavnosti, ki na trgu niso bile razširjene in so bile zelo tvegane v tehnološkem smislu.
Eligible investment by the company was worth ITL 67144 million.
Upravičene naložbe družbe so znašale 67144 milijonov ITL.
Aid received in the form of interest forgone was ITL 13902 million, giving an intensity of 20,70 %, which is below the maximum initial intensity of 33 % allowable under the 1996 Framework.
Pomoč, prejeta v obliki opuščenih obresti, je znašala 13902 milijonov ITL, pri čemer je bila intenzivnost 20,70 %, kar je manj od začetne največje intenzivnosti 33 %, dovoljene v skladu z Okvirom iz leta 1996.
The reimbursement schedule has nevertheless been adjusted to take account of the fact that the aid was disbursed in a manner different from what was foreseen, and the fact that the loan was smaller.
Kljub temu so bili odplačilni roki prilagojeni, tako da so upoštevali dejstvo, da je bila pomoč izplačana drugače, kot je bilo predvideno, in dejstvo, da je bilo posojilo manjše.
Reimbursements for this project will follow the adjusted schedule until 2018.
Pri vračilih za ta projekt se bodo do leta 2018 upoštevali prilagojeni roki.
The Commission can therefore conclude that the aid is compatible with the 1996 Framework, since it concerned R & D activities and had an incentive effect, on the condition that that the reimbursement plan is completed in 2018.
Zato lahko Komisija ugotovi, da je pomoč združljiva z Okvirom iz leta 1996, ker je zadevala raziskovalne in razvojne dejavnosti ter je imela spodbujevalni učinek, pod pogojem, da se odplačilni načrt konča leta 2018.
Koala project carried out by Agusta
Projekt A119 Koala, ki ga je izvajala družba Agusta
The project concerned the development of a helicopter by Agusta.
Projekt je zadeval razvoj helikopterja družbe Agusta.
The A119 Koala is the utility version of an eight-seat helicopter, powered by a single turboshaft engine, and produced for the civilian market.
Koala je večnamenska različica helikopterja z osmimi sedeži, ki ga poganja enojen turbinski motor za pogon helikopterjev in je namenjen civilnemu trgu.
It was listed in the first initiating decision as project No 3.
V prvi odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka je bil naveden kot projekt št. 3.
On the basis of the information available at that time, the Commission there took the view that the project was not subject to individual notification to the Commission, so that it fell outside the scope of that decision.
Na podlagi takrat dostopnih informacij je Komisija menila, da ni šlo za individualno priglasitev Komisije, zato je bil projekt v odločitvi ni bil obravnavan.
Subsequently, it appeared that the amount of eligible investment and the amount of aid were in fact such that the project should have been notified individually to the Commission.
Potem se je izkazalo, da sta bila znesek upravičenih naložb in znesek pomoči dejansko takšna, da bi bilo treba projekt individualno priglasiti Komisiji.
Aid was granted in 1997 for eligible investment of ITL 58137 million in the period 1997-1999.
Pomoč je bila dodeljena leta 1997 za upravičene naložbe v višini 58137 milijonov ITL v obdobju 1997–1999.
The aid received had an intensity of 26,92 %, which was below the initial maximum intensity of 32 % allowable under the 1996 Framework.
Prejeta pomoč je imela intenzivnost 26,92 %, kar je bilo manj od začetne največje intenzivnosti 32 %, dovoljene v skladu z Okvirom iz leta 1996.
The reimbursements for this project will thus follow the schedule until 2009.
Pri vračilih za ta projekt se bodo tako upoštevali roki do leta 2009.
The Commission can therefore conclude that the A119 Koala project carried out by Agusta is compatible with the 1996 Framework provided that the reimbursement schedule is adhered to.
Zato Komisija ugotavlja, da je projekt A119 Koala, ki ga je izvedla družba Agusta, združljiv z Okvirom iz leta 1996, pod pogojem, da se upoštevajo odplačilni roki.
project carried out by Aermacchi
Projekt DO328, ki ga je izvajala družba Aermacchi
This project concerned the basic version of the DO328 and was carried out by Aermacchi.
Zadevni projekt je vključeval osnovno različico DO328 in ga je izvedla družba Aermacchi.
The DO328 is a regional jet developed by Dornier.
je regionalno reaktivno letalo, ki ga je razvila družba Dornier.
Aermacchi was entrusted with the development of two segments of the fuselage and the assembly of the entire fuselage, made up of 13 panels produced for Dornier by the Korean company Daewoo.
Naloga družbe Aermacchi je bilo razviti dva dela trupa zrakoplova in sestaviti celoten trup zrakoplova, ki sestoji iz 13 plošč, ki jih je za Dornier izdelala korejska družba Daewoo.
The R & D project allowed Aermacchi to acquire the knowledge necessary to develop the two segments and to assemble the fuselage.
Projekt za raziskave in razvoj je družbi Aermacchi omogočil, da je pridobila znanje, potrebno za razvoj dveh delov trupa zrakoplova in njegovo sestavo.
These activities were new to the company, which until then had concentrated on military training aircraft.
Te dejavnosti so bile za družbo nove, saj se je do takrat ukvarjala predvsem z zrakoplovi za vojaško usposabljanje.
The eligible activities were carried out in 1990 and 1991.
Dejavnosti, ki so upravičene do pomoči, so se izvajale v letih 1990 in 1991.
The project was listed in the first initiating decision as project No 10.
Projekt je bil v prvi odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka naveden kot projekt št. 10.
The Commission there decided to raise no objection to the project because, based on the information available, it considered it to be compatible.
Komisija takrat ni izrazila nobenih pomislekov glede projekta, ker je na podlagi dostopnih informacij menila, da je združljiv.