natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
to refuse or reduce the liability referred to in the first paragraph of Article 3 or the guarantee obligation referred to in Article 7 in cases where the employee, on his or her own or together with his or her close relatives, was the owner of an essential part of the employer’s undertaking or business and had a considerable influence on its activities.
zavrniti ali zmanjšati odgovornost iz člena 3 ali obveznost jamstva iz člena 7 v primerih, ko je bil delavec sam ali skupaj s svojimi bližnjimi sorodniki lastnik bistvenega deleža delodajalčevega podjetja ali obrata in je imel znaten vpliv na dejavnosti podjetja.
Member States shall notify the Commission and the other Member States of the types of national insolvency proceedings falling within the scope of this Directive, and of any amendments relating thereto.
Države članice obvestijo Komisijo in druge države članice o vrstah nacionalnih postopkov v primeru plačilne nesposobnosti, ki sodijo v področje uporabe te direktive, in o morebitnih spremembah v zvezi z njo.
The Commission shall publish these communications in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Komisija objavi ta obvestila v Uradnem listu Evropske Unije.
Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.
Države članice Komisijo obvestijo o besedilu določb zakonov in drugih predpisov, ki jih sprejmejo na področju, ki ga ureja ta direktiva.
By 8 October 2010 at the latest, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the implementation and application in the Member States of Articles 1 to 4, 9 and 10, Article 11, second paragraph, Article 12, point (c), and Articles 13 and 14.
Komisija predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu najpozneje do 8. oktobra 2010 poročilo o izvajanju in uporabi členov 1 do 4, členov 9 in 10, drugega odstavka člena 11, točke (c) člena 12 ter členov 13 in 14 v državah članicah.
Directive 80/987/EEC, as amended by the acts listed in Annex I, is repealed, without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States relating to the time-limits for transposition into national law and application of the Directives set out in Annex I, Part C.
Direktiva 80/987/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena z akti, navedenimi v Prilogi I, je razveljavljena, brez poseganja v obveznosti držav članic glede rokov za prenos v nacionalno pravo in začetka uporabe direktiv, ki so določeni v delu C Priloge I.
References to the repealed Directive shall be construed as references to this Directive and shall be read in accordance with the correlation table in Annex II.
Sklici na razveljavljeno direktivo se upoštevajo kot sklici na to direktivo in se berejo v skladu s korelacijsko tabelo v Prilogi II.
OJ C 161, 13.7.2007, p. 75.
UL C 161, 13.7.2007, str. 75.
Opinion of the European Parliament of 19 June 2007 (OJ C 146 E, 12.6.2008, p. 71) and Council Decision of 25 September 2008.
Mnenje Evropskega parlamenta z dne 19. junija 2007 (UL C 146 E, 12.6.2008, str. 71) in Sklep Sveta z dne 25. septembra 2008.
See Annex I, Parts A and B.
Glej Prilogo I, Dela A in B.
OJ L 14, 20.1.1998, p. 9.
UL L 14, 20.1.1998, str. 9.
OJ L 175, 10.7.1999, p. 43.
UL L 175, 10.7.1999, str. 43.
Council Directive 80/987/EEC
Direktiva Sveta 80/987/EGS
(OJ L 283, 28.10.1980, p. 23).
(UL L 283, 28.10.1980, str. 23).
Council Directive 87/164/EEC
Direktiva Sveta 87/164/EGS
(OJ L 66, 11.3.1987, p. 11).
(UL L 66, 11.3.1987, str. 11).
Directive 2002/74/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2002/74/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(OJ L 270, 8.10.2002, p. 10).
(UL L 270, 8.10.2002, str. 10).
Non-repealed amending act
Nerazveljavljeni akt o spremembi
1994 Act of Accession
Akt o pristopu iz leta 1994
Time-limits for transposition into national law and application
Roki za prenos v nacionalno pravo in začetek uporabe
80/987/EEC
80/987/EGS
23 October 1983
oktober 1983
87/164/EEC
87/164/EGS
7 October 2005
oktober 2005
Directive 80/987/EEC
Direktiva 80/987/EGS
Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2008/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks
o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic v zvezi z blagovnimi znamkami
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 95 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, zlasti člena 95 Pogodbe,
The content of Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks [3] has been amended [4].
Direktiva Sveta 89/104/EGS z dne 21. decembra 1988 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic v zvezi z blagovnimi znamkami [3] je bila spremenjena [4].
The trade mark laws applicable in the Member States before the entry into force of Directive 89/104/EEC contained disparities which may have impeded the free movement of goods and freedom to provide services and may have distorted competition within the common market.
Zakonodaja o blagovnih znamkah, ki se je uporabljala v državah članicah pred začetkom veljavnosti Direktive 89/104/EGS, je vsebovala neskladnosti, ki so lahko ovirale prost pretok blaga in storitev ter izkrivljale konkurenco na skupnem trgu.
It was therefore necessary to approximate the laws of the Member States in order to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market.
Za dobro delovanje notranjega trga je zato bilo treba približati zakonodaje držav članic.
It is important not to disregard the solutions and advantages which the Community trade mark system may afford to undertakings wishing to acquire trade marks.
Pomembno je upoštevati rešitve in prednosti, ki jih sistem blagovnih znamk Skupnosti lahko zagotovi podjetjem, ki želijo pridobiti blagovne znamke.
It does not appear to be necessary to undertake full-scale approximation of the trade mark laws of the Member States.
Ne zdi se nujno lotiti popolnega približevanja zakonov o blagovnih znamkah v državah članicah.
It will be sufficient if approximation is limited to those national provisions of law which most directly affect the functioning of the internal market.
Zato bo dovolj, če se približevanje omeji na nacionalne določbe zakona, ki najbolj neposredno vplivajo na delovanje notranjega trga.
This Directive should not deprive the Member States of the right to continue to protect trade marks acquired through use but should take them into account only in regard to the relationship between them and trade marks acquired by registration.
Ta direktiva državam članicam ne bi smela odvzeti pravice do nadaljnjega varstva blagovnih znamk, pridobljenih z uporabo, temveč bi morala urejati le razmerje med njimi in blagovnimi znamkami, pridobljenimi z registracijo.
Member States should also remain free to fix the provisions of procedure concerning the registration, the revocation and the invalidity of trade marks acquired by registration.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost še naprej prosto določiti postopek v zvezi z registracijo, razveljavitvijo in neveljavnostjo blagovnih znamk, pridobljenih z registracijo.
They can, for example, determine the form of trade mark registration and invalidity procedures, decide whether earlier rights should be invoked either in the registration procedure or in the invalidity procedure or in both and, if they allow earlier rights to be invoked in the registration procedure, have an opposition procedure or an ex officio examination procedure or both.
Določijo lahko na primer način registracije blagovne znamke in postopkov za ugotavljanje neveljavnosti, odločajo o tem, ali naj se prejšnje pravice uveljavljajo v postopku registracije ali v postopku za ugotavljanje neveljavnosti ali v obeh, in, če omogočajo uveljavljanje prejšnjih pravic v postopku registracije, postopek ugovora ali preizkus pogojev po uradni dolžnosti ali oboje.
Member States should remain free to determine the effects of revocation or invalidity of trade marks.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost še naprej prosto določiti učinke razveljavitve ali neveljavnosti blagovnih znamk.
This Directive should not exclude the application to trade marks of provisions of law of the Member States other than trade mark law, such as the provisions relating to unfair competition, civil liability or consumer protection.
Ta direktiva ne more izključiti uporabe drugih predpisov držav članic, ki niso predpisi o blagovnih znamkah, na primer predpisov v zvezi z nelojalno konkurenco, civilnopravno odgovornostjo ali varstvom potrošnikov.
Attainment of the objectives at which this approximation of laws is aiming requires that the conditions for obtaining and continuing to hold a registered trade mark be, in general, identical in all Member States.
Doseganje ciljev, h katerim je usmerjeno približevanje zakonodaje, zahteva, da so pogoji pridobivanja in ohranjanja registrirane blagovne znamke na splošno enaki v vseh državah članicah.
To this end, it is necessary to list examples of signs which may constitute a trade mark, provided that such signs are capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings.
V ta namen, bi bilo treba izdelati seznam znakov, ki lahko sestavljajo blagovno znamko, ob pogoju, da je zaradi takšnih znakov mogoče razlikovati blago ali storitve enega podjetja od blaga ali storitev drugega.
The grounds for refusal or invalidity concerning the trade mark itself, for example, the absence of any distinctive character, or concerning conflicts between the trade mark and earlier rights, should be listed in an exhaustive manner, even if some of these grounds are listed as an option for the Member States which should therefore be able to maintain or introduce those grounds in their legislation.
Treba bi bilo izčrpno navesti razloge za zavrnitev ali neveljavnost v zvezi s samo blagovno znamko, na primer odsotnost vsakega razlikovalnega značaja, ali v zvezi s kolizijami med blagovno znamko in prejšnjimi pravicami, tudi če so nekateri od teh razlogov navedeni kot izbira držav članic, ki torej te razloge lahko ohranijo ali uvedejo v svojih zakonih.
Member States should be able to maintain or introduce into their legislation grounds of refusal or invalidity linked to conditions for obtaining and continuing to hold a trade mark for which there is no provision of approximation, concerning, for example, the eligibility for the grant of a trade mark, the renewal of the trade mark or rules on fees, or related to the non-compliance with procedural rules.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da v svojih zakonih ohranijo ali uvedejo razloge za zavrnitev ali neveljavnost, povezane s pogoji za pridobivanje in nadaljnje lastništvo blagovne znamke, za katere ni določb o približevanju, ki zadevajo na primer upravičenost do dodelitve blagovne znamke, podaljšanje blagovne znamke, pristojbine ali neizpolnjevanje pravil postopka.
In order to reduce the total number of trade marks registered and protected in the Community and, consequently, the number of conflicts which arise between them, it is essential to require that registered trade marks must actually be used or, if not used, be subject to revocation.
Za zmanjšanje skupnega števila blagovnih znamk, registriranih in varovanih v Skupnosti, in posledično števila sporov, ki se med njimi pojavljajo, je treba zahtevati, da se registrirane blagovne znamke dejansko uporabljajo ali v primeru, da se ne, razveljavijo.
It is necessary to provide that a trade mark cannot be invalidated on the basis of the existence of a non-used earlier trade mark, while the Member States should remain free to apply the same principle in respect of the registration of a trade mark or to provide that a trade mark may not be successfully invoked in infringement proceedings if it is established as a result of a plea that the trade mark could be revoked.
Treba je poskrbeti, da se blagovne znamka ne more razveljaviti na podlagi obstoja neuporabljene prejšnje blagovne znamke, medtem ko lahko države članice še naprej prosto uporabljajo isto načelo glede registracije blagovne znamke ali predvidijo, da se blagovna znamka ne more uspešno uveljavljati v postopku zaradi kršitev pravic, kadar se na podlagi zahteve za razveljavitev blagovne znamke ugotovi, da bi se znamka lahko razveljavila.
In all these cases it is up to the Member States to establish the applicable rules of procedure.
Določitev pravil postopka je v vseh teh primerih prepuščena državam članicam.
It is fundamental, in order to facilitate the free movement of goods and services, to ensure that registered trade marks enjoy the same protection under the legal systems of all the Member States.
Za zagotovitev prostega pretoka blaga in storitev je bistvenega pomena zagotoviti, da registrirane blagovne znamke v pravnih sistemih vseh držav članic uživajo enako varstvo.
This should not, however, prevent the Member States from granting at their option extensive protection to those trade marks which have a reputation.
To pa ne sme preprečiti državam članicam, da po lastni izbiri določijo večji obseg varstva blagovnim znamkam, ki imajo ugled.
The protection afforded by the registered trade mark, the function of which is in particular to guarantee the trade mark as an indication of origin, should be absolute in the case of identity between the mark and the sign and the goods or services.
Varstvo, ki ga zagotovi registrirana blagovna znamka in katerega funkcija je zlasti zagotovitev, da blagovna znamka označuje izvor, bi moralo biti popolno v primeru enakosti blagovne znamke in znaka ter blaga ali storitev.
The protection should apply also in the case of similarity between the mark and the sign and the goods or services.
Varstvo bi moralo veljati tudi v primeru podobnosti med blagovno znamko in znakom ter blagom ali storitvami.
It is indispensable to give an interpretation of the concept of similarity in relation to the likelihood of confusion.
Neizogibno potrebno je podati interpretacijo koncepta podobnosti v zvezi z verjetnostjo zmede.
The likelihood of confusion, the appreciation of which depends on numerous elements and, in particular, on the recognition of the trade mark on the market, the association which can be made with the used or registered sign, the degree of similarity between the trade mark and the sign and between the goods or services identified, should constitute the specific condition for such protection.
Verjetnost zmede, katere upoštevanje je odvisno od številnih elementov, zlasti od prepoznavnosti blagovne znamke na tržišču, povezovanja, ki ga lahko povzroči uporabljen ali registriran znak, stopnje podobnosti med blagovno znamko ter označenim blagom ali storitvami, bi morala biti poseben pogoj za takšno varstvo.
The ways in which likelihood of confusion may be established, and in particular the onus of proof, should be a matter for national procedural rules which should not be prejudiced by this Directive.
Načini, na katere se lahko ugotovi verjetnost zmede, in zlasti dokazno breme, bi morali biti predmet nacionalnih postopkovnih pravil, v katere ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati.
It is important, for reasons of legal certainty and without inequitably prejudicing the interests of a proprietor of an earlier trade mark, to provide that the latter may no longer request a declaration of invalidity nor may he oppose the use of a trade mark subsequent to his own of which he has knowingly tolerated the use for a substantial length of time, unless the application for the subsequent trade mark was made in bad faith.
Zaradi pravne varnosti in brez nepravičnega vpliva na interese imetnika prejšnje blagovne znamke, je pomembno zagotoviti, da slednji ne sme več zahtevati ugotovitve neveljavnosti niti nasprotovati uporabi blagovne znamke, ki je kasnejša od njegove, katere uporabo je dolgo vede dopuščal, razen če je prijava kasnejše blagovne znamke vložena v slabi veri.
All Member States are bound by the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property.
Vse države članice obvezuje Pariška konvencija za varstvo industrijske lastnine.
It is necessary that the provisions of this Directive should be entirely consistent with those of the said Convention.
Nujno je, da se določbe te direktive popolnoma ujemajo z določbami omenjene konvencije.
The obligations of the Member States resulting from that Convention should not be affected by this Directive.
Ta direktiva ne sme vplivati na obveznosti držav članic, ki izhajajo iz te Konvencije.
Where appropriate, the second paragraph of Article 307 of the Treaty should apply.
Kjer je to primerno, bi bilo treba uporabiti drugi pododstavek člena 307 Pogodbe.
This Directive should be without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States relating to the time limit for transposition into national law of Directive 89/104/EEC set out in Annex I, Part B,
Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v obveznosti držav članic glede roka za prenos v nacionalno pravo Direktive 98/104/EGS, ki je določen v delu B Priloge I –
This Directive shall apply to every trade mark in respect of goods or services which is the subject of registration or of an application in a Member State for registration as an individual trade mark, a collective mark or a guarantee or certification mark, or which is the subject of a registration or an application for registration in the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property or of an international registration having effect in a Member State.
Ta direktiva se uporablja za vsako blagovno znamko glede blaga ali storitev, ki je predmet registracije ali prijave za registracijo v državi članici kot posamična blagovna znamka, kolektivna znamka ali garancijska ali certifikacijska znamka ali ki je predmet registracije ali prijave za registracijo v Uradu Beneluksa za intelektualno lastnino ali mednarodne registracije z učinkom v državi članici.
Signs of which a trade mark may consist
Znaki, ki lahko sestavljajo blagovno znamko
A trade mark may consist of any signs capable of being represented graphically, particularly words, including personal names, designs, letters, numerals, the shape of goods or of their packaging, provided that such signs are capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings.
Blagovna znamka je lahko sestavljena iz kakršnihkoli znakov, ki jih je mogoče predstaviti grafično, zlasti iz besed, vključno z osebnimi imeni, slik, črk, števil, oblike blaga ali njegove embalaže, če se s pomočjo teh znakov blago ali storitve nekega podjetja lahko razlikujejo od blaga ali storitev drugih podjetij.
Grounds for refusal or invalidity
Razlogi za zavrnitev ali neveljavnost
The following shall not be registered or, if registered, shall be liable to be declared invalid:
Ne registrira se ali, če je registrirano, se lahko razglasi za neveljavno naslednje:
signs which cannot constitute a trade mark;
znaki, ki ne morejo sestavljati blagovne znamke;
trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character;
blagovne znamke, ki so brez slehernega razlikovalnega značaja;
trade marks which consist exclusively of signs or indications which may serve, in trade, to designate the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, geographical origin, or the time of production of the goods or of rendering of the service, or other characteristics of the goods or services;
blagovne znamke, ki jih sestavljajo izključno znaki ali označbe, ki lahko v gospodarskem prometu označujejo vrsto, kakovost, količino, namen, vrednost, geografski izvor ali čas proizvodnje blaga ali opravljanja storitev ali druge lastnosti blaga ali storitev;
trade marks which consist exclusively of signs or indications which have become customary in the current language or in the bona fide and established practices of the trade;
blagovne znamke, ki so sestavljene izključno iz znakov ali označb, ki so postali običajni v jezikovni rabi ali v dobroverni ustaljeni praksi trgovanja;
signs which consist exclusively of:
znaki, sestavljeni izključno iz:
the shape which results from the nature of the goods themselves;
oblike, ki izhaja iz same narave blaga;
the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result;
oblike blaga, ki je nujna za dosego tehničnega učinka;
the shape which gives substantial value to the goods;
oblike, ki daje blagu bistveno vrednost;
trade marks which are contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality;
blagovne znamke, ki nasprotujejo javnemu redu ali sprejetim moralnim načelom;
trade marks which are of such a nature as to deceive the public, for instance as to the nature, quality or geographical origin of the goods or service;
blagovne znamke, katerih narava zavaja javnost, zlasti glede narave, kakovosti ali geografskega izvora blaga ali storitve;
trade marks which have not been authorised by the competent authorities and are to be refused or invalidated pursuant to Article 6 ter of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Paris Convention’.
blagovne znamke, za katere ni bilo izdano dovoljenje pristojnih organov in morajo biti zavrnjene ali razveljavljene na podlagi člena 6 ter Pariške konvencije za varstvo industrijske lastnine, v nadaljnjem besedilu „Pariška konvencija“.
Any Member State may provide that a trade mark shall not be registered or, if registered, shall be liable to be declared invalid where and to the extent that:
Vsaka država članica lahko določi, da se blagovna znamka ne registrira ali da se jo, če je registrirana, lahko razglasi za neveljavno, če in v naslednjem obsegu:
the use of that trade mark may be prohibited pursuant to provisions of law other than trade mark law of the Member State concerned or of the Community;
se lahko uporaba te blagovne znamke prepove v skladu z določbami, ki niso določbe o blagovnih znamkah zadevne države članice ali Skupnosti;
the trade mark covers a sign of high symbolic value, in particular a religious symbol;
blagovna znamka vsebuje znak visoke simbolične vrednosti, zlasti verski simbol;
the trade mark includes badges, emblems and escutcheons other than those covered by Article 6 ter of the Paris Convention and which are of public interest, unless the consent of the competent authority to their registration has been given in conformity with the legislation of the Member State;
blagovna znamka vsebuje znamenja, embleme in grbe, ki niso zajeti v členu 6 ter Pariške konvencije in ki so v javnem interesu, razen če je bila privolitev ustreznih organov v njeno registracijo dana v skladu z zakonodajo države članice;
the application for registration of the trade mark was made in bad faith by the applicant.
prijavo za registracijo blagovne znamke je prosilec vložil v slabi veri.
A trade mark shall not be refused registration or be declared invalid in accordance with paragraph 1(b), (c) or (d) if, before the date of application for registration and following the use which has been made of it, it has acquired a distinctive character.
Registracija blagovne znamke se ne zavrne ali ne razglasi za neveljavno v skladu z odstavkom 1(b), (c) ali (d), če je pred datumom prijave za registracijo in z njeno uporabo dobila razlikovalen značaj.
Any Member State may in addition provide that this provision shall also apply where the distinctive character was acquired after the date of application for registration or after the date of registration.
Vsaka država članica lahko poleg tega določi, da ta določba velja tudi, če je blagovna znamka dobila razlikovalni značaj po datumu vložitve prijave za registracijo ali po datumu registracije.
Any Member State may provide that, by derogation from paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, the grounds of refusal of registration or invalidity in force in that State prior to the date of entry into force of the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 89/104/EEC, shall apply to trade marks for which application has been made prior to that date.
Vsaka država članica lahko določi, da se z odstopanjem od odstavkov 1, 2 in 3 razlogi za zavrnitev registracije ali neveljavnost, ki veljajo v tej državi pred datumom začetka veljavnosti določb, potrebnih za uskladitev z Direktivo 89/104/EGS, uporabljajo za blagovne znamke, za katere je bila prijava vložena pred tem datumom.