natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The NPV represents the market value of the VRS, i.e. the amount that OTE would have to pay to a third party if this third party took over OTE’s obligations accruing from the VRS.
NPV pomeni tržno vrednost SPU, tj. znesek, ki bi ga družba OTE morala plačati tretji stranki, če bi ta tretja stranka prevzela tiste obveznosti družbe OTE, ki izhajajo iz SPU.
It should be recalled that in their earlier submission on 20 December 2005, the Greek authorities, at a time when the nominal VRS was estimated at EUR 1161,0 million, had calculated the NPV of the VRS at EUR 863 million using as a discount rate OTE’s WACC (weighted averaged cost of capital) estimated at 7,83 %.
Treba je opozoriti, da so grški organi v svojem predhodnem uradnem obvestilu z dne 20. decembra 2005, v času, ko je bila nominalna vrednost SPU ocenjena na 1161,0 milijona EUR, nominalno sedanjo vrednost SPU izračunali v znesku 863 milijonov EUR z uporabo tehtanega povprečja stroškov kapitala družbe OTE v višini 7,83 % kot diskontno stopnjo.
See footnote 13.
Glej opombo 13.
This was also the approach taken by the Greek authorities in their submissions of 4 November 2005.
Ta pristop so grški organi uporabili tudi v svojih uradnih obvestilih z dne 4. novembra 2005.
In this respect, CRA International is in line with the certified accounts of OTE by KPMG, which also used a discount rate of 3 %.
V tem pogledu je CRA International usklajena s potrjenimi računovodskimi izkazi družbe OTE, ki jih je pripravila KPMG, ki je tudi uporabila 3-odstotno diskontno stopnjo.
Having only the responsibility to verify OTE’s pre-tax accounts, KPMG did not need to calculate the post-tax NPV of the nominal VRS.
KPMG ni bilo treba izračunati NPV nominalne SPU po plačilu davka, saj je morala samo potrditi računovodske izkaze družbe OTE pred plačilom davka.
These extra costs are broken down as follows: burden to OTE of the permanent status: EUR 322,9 million, and burden to OTE of higher salaries: EUR 147,0 million.
Ti dodatni stroški so razdeljeni na naslednji način: obremenitev OTE zaradi stalnega statusa: 322,9 milijona EUR in obremenitev OTE zaradi višjih plač: 147,0 milijona EUR.
According to the Greek authorities, OTE, like all other private companies, pays compulsory employer’s unemployment contributions as required under the applicable social security legislation.
Grški organi trdijo, da družba OTE, kot vsa druga zasebna podjetja, plačuje obvezne prispevke za brezposelnost delavcev, kot je določeno z veljavno zakonodajo o socialni varnosti.
This amounts to 2,76 %, while an additional 1,33 % is paid by the employee.
To znaša 2,76 %, medtem ko zaposleni plača dodatnih 1,33 %.
The Greek authorities also state that Article 24 of the recent Law No 3470/2006 clearly provides that OTE and other telecom service providers no longer enjoy a specific status that gives them the right to be exempted from the advertising tax.
Grški organi tudi navajajo, da člen 24 Zakona št. 3470/2006 jasno določa, da OTE in drugi ponudniki telekomunikacijskih storitev nimajo več posebnega statusa, ki jim dodeljuje pravico oprostitve plačila davka za oglaševanje.
Pursuant to Law No 1264/1982, public companies or utilities are exempted from the advertising tax only if their share capital belongs by absolute majority to the Greek State.
V skladu z Zakonom št. 1264/1982 so javna podjetja ali javne gospodarske družbe oproščene plačila davka za oglaševanje samo, če je njihov osnovni kapital v absolutni večinski lasti grške države.
Accordingly, OTE and all other telecom providers are now liable to pay the advertisement tax.
V skladu z navedenim so družba OTE in drugi ponudniki telekomunikacijskih storitev zdaj zavezani k plačilu davka za oglaševanje.
According to the Greek authorities, the Administrative Court concluded that the characterization of a company as a public utility does not relate to its legal status, or to the legal framework within which it operates, but depends solely on the nature of the services it provides.
V skladu z grškimi organi je Upravno sodišče odločilo, da opis podjetja kot javne gospodarske družbe ni povezan z njegovim pravnim statusom, ali s pravnim okvirom, znotraj katerega deluje, ampak je popolnoma odvisen od narave storitev, ki jih podjetje ponuja.
Therefore, according to the Court, undertakings offering goods and services deemed vital for society, such as telecommunications, water supply and energy, constitute utilities.
V skladu s Sodiščem so zato podjetja, ki ponujajo blago in storitve, ki so ključnega pomena za družbo, kot so telekomunikacije, dobava vode in energije, javne gospodarske družbe.
Case C-305/89 Italy v Commission [1991] ECR I-1603, paragraph 19.
Zadeva C-305/89, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1991, str. I-1603, odstavek 19.
Joined Cases C-278/92, C-279/92 and C-280/92 Spain v Commission [1994] ECR I-4103, paragraph 22.
Združene zadeve C-278/92, C-279/92 in C-280/92, Španija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1994, str. I-4103, odstavek 22.
Case C-305/89, loc. cit., paragraph 22.
Zadeva C-305/89, na navedenem mestu, odstavek 22.
See, inter alia, the judgments in Case 30/59 De Gezamenlijke Steenkolenmijnen in Limburg v High Authority [1961] ECR 1; Case C-387/92 Banco Exterior de España [1994] ECR I-877, paragraph 13; Case C-241/94 France v Commission [1996] ECR I-4551, paragraph 34; and Case C-256/97 DM Transport [1999] ECR I-3913, paragraph 19.
Glej, med drugim, sodbe v zadevi 30/59, De Gezamenlijke Steenkolenmijnen in Limburg proti High Authority, Recueil 1961, str. 1; zadeva C-387/92, Banco Exterior de España, Recueil 1994, str. I-877, odstavek 13; zadeva C-241/94, Francija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1996, str. I-4551, odstavek 34; in zadeva C-256/97, DM Transport, Recueil 1999, str. I-3913, odstavek 19.
Case 173/73 Italy v Commission [1974] ECR 709, recital 15; to the same effect, judgment in Case C-301/87 France v Commission [1990] ECR I-307, recital 41.
Zadeva 173/73, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1974, str. 709, odstavek 15; ter v tem smislu tudi sodba v zadevi C-301/87, Francija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1990, str. I-307, odstavek 41.
Case T-157/01, loc. cit., recital 57.
Zadeva T-157/01, na navedenem mestu, odstavek 57.
Case 173/73 Italy v Commission [1974] ECR 709, paragraph 13; Case C-310/85 Deufil [1987] ECR 901, paragraph 8; Case C-241/94 France v Commission [1996] ECR I-4551, paragraph 20.
Zadeva 173/73, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1974, str. 709, odstavek 13; zadeva C-310/85, Deufil, Recueil 1987, str. 901, odstavek 8; zadeva C-241/94, Francija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1996, str. I-4551, odstavek 20.
Case C-387/92 Banco Exterior [1994] ECR I-877, paragraph 13; Case C-241/94 France v Commission [1996] ECR I-4551, paragraph 34.
Zadeva C-387/92, Banco Exterior, Recueil 1994, str. I-877, odstavek 13; zadeva C-241/94, Francija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1996, str. I-4551, odstavek 34.
Case C-5/01 Belgium v Commission [2002] ECR I-1191, paragraph 39.
Zadeva C-5/01, Belgija proti Komisiji, Recueil 2002, str. I-1191, odstavek 39.
Case C-30/59 Gezamenlijke Steenkolenmijnen [1961] ECR 3, paragraphs 29 and 30; Case 173/73 Italy v Commission [1974] ECR 709, paragraphs 12 and 13; Case C-241/94 France v Commission [1996] ECR I-4551, paragraphs 29 and 35; Case C-251/97 France v Commission [1999] ECR I-6639, paragraph 40 and 46-47; see also Case T-109/01 Fleuren Compost [2004] ECR II-127, paragraph 54.
Zadeva C-30/59, Gezamenlijke Steenkolenmijnen, Recueil 1961, str. 3, odstavka 29 in 30; zadeva 173/73, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1974, str. 709, odstavka 12 in 13; zadeva C-241/94, Francija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1996, str. I-4551, odstavka 29 in 35; zadeva C-251/97, Francija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1999, str. I-6639, odstavki 40 in 46–47; glej tudi zadeva T-109/01, Fleuren Compost, Recueil 2004, str. II-127, odstavek 54.
Case 173/73 Italy v Commission [1974] ECR 709, paragraph 26; Case C-387/92 Banco Exterior de España [1994] ECR I-877, paragraphs 12 and 13; and Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg [2003] ECR I-9919, paragraph 84, and the judgments cited therein.
Zadeva 173/73, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1974, str. 709, odstavek 26; zadeva C-387/92, Banco Exterior de España, Recueil 1994, str. I-877, odstavka 12 in 13; in zadeva C-280/00, Altmark Trans in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, Recueil 2003, str. I-9919, odstavek 84, in v njih navedene sodbe.
Case C-482/99 France v Commission [2002] ECR I-4397, paragraph 40.
Zadeva C-482/99, Francija proti Komisiji, Recueil 2002, str. I-4397, odstavek 40.
Case T-187/99 Agrana Zucker und Stärke AG v Commission [2001] ECR I-1587, paragraph 74.
Zadeva T-187/99, Agrana Zucker und Stärke AG proti Komisiji, Recueil 2001, str. I-1587, odstavek 74.
These obstacles are due to the fact that entry to the Greek electronic communications market through the acquisition of OTE is prevented, to date, by the extremely inflexible employment conditions applied in OTE and by the fact that OTE employees enjoy a de facto permanent status, which prevents OTE from being taken over by other business groups.
Te ovire so posledica dejstva, da izredno nefleksibilni pogoji zaposlovanja, ki jih uporablja družba OTE, in dejstvo, da imajo delavci pri OTE dejansko status stalno zaposlenih, kar drugim poslovnim skupinam preprečuje prevzem te družbe, dozdaj preprečujejo vstop na grški trg elektronskih telekomunikacij s pridobitvijo družbe OTE.
On the other hand, and for the same reasons, exit from the market, in the form of a relinquishment by the State of its control, seems at present extremely unlikely.
Po drugi strani, in zaradi enakih razlogov, se zdi izstop iz trga, v obliki odstopa nadzora države, malo verjeten.
For instance, employees with 30 years of service (right to a pension) could continue to work until they reached the age of 58 or completed 35 years of service, whichever happened first.
Na primer, zaposleni s 30 leti delovne dobe (pravica do pokojnine) so lahko nadaljevali delo do starosti 58 let ali do dopolnjene delovne dobe 35 let, kar se zgodi prej.
Such employees would rather choose to continue working until mandatory retirement in order to increase the calculation base of their pension.
Ti zaposleni so se raje odločili za nadaljevanje dela do obvezne upokojitve, da bi si zvišali osnovo za izračun pokojnine.
As the Greek authorities pointed out, salaries grow at a higher rate than pensions, and OTE employees generally prefer to continue working for the company since pensions are calculated by reference to the last salary.
Kot so poudarili grški organi, plače naraščajo po višji stopnji kot pokojnine in zaposleni pri OTE na splošno raje še naprej delajo pri družbi, ker se pokojnina izračuna na podlagi zadnje plače.
As mentioned in recital 56, the ‘regular’ VRS concerns only employees who have already acquired pension rights but have not yet fulfilled the conditions for mandatory retirement.
Kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi 56, se „redna“ SPU nanaša samo na zaposlene, ki so že dosegli pravico za pokojnino, ampak še niso izpolnili pogojev za obvezno upokojitev.
The regular VRS does not involve ‘notional’ years and therefore its costs are not covered by the Greek State’s contribution.
Redna SPU ne vključuje „hipotetičnih“ let in zato grška država teh stroškov ne krije.
See above, footnote 17.
Glej opombo 17 zgoraj.
Reference should also be made to the Commission’s decision in the EDF case (see footnote 16).
Treba se je sklicevati tudi na Odločbo Komisije v zadevi EDF (glej opombo 16 zgoraj).
In EDF, the Commission declared compatible a measure whereby the French State relieved enterprises in the French electricity and gas sectors of the payment of some of the specific pension rights the employees had acquired in the past, at a time when companies were operating under a legal monopoly.
V tej odločbi je Komisija razglasila združljivost ukrepa, s katerim je Francija nekatera podjetja v sektorju industrije električne energije in plinarn oprostila plačila nekaterih pokojninskih dajatev, ki so jih zaposleni pridobili v preteklosti, ko so podjetja delovala monopolno.
The Commission considered that at that time the companies were shielded from any intra-industry competition and could thus bear the higher pension rights without suffering any significant economic disadvantage.
Komisija je upoštevala, da so bila podjetja v tistem obdobju zaščitena pred kakršno koli konkurenco znotraj panoge in so zato lahko krila stroške višjih pokojninskih pravic, ne da bi bila v gospodarsko slabšem položaju.
The Commission acknowledged that these ‘past liabilities’ represented a significant difficulty for these enterprises, once they were operating in competition with other electricity or gas enterprises that did not have to bear similar costs from the past (recital 143 of the Decision).
Komisija je potrdila, da te „pretekle obveznosti“ pomenijo veliko težavo za ta podjetja, ko so delovala v konkurenci z ostalimi podjetji električne energije in plina, ki jim ni bilo treba kriti istih stroškov iz preteklosti (uvodna izjava 143 Odločbe).
The Commission regarded the aid granted ‘with the view to such sectoral reorganization’ as necessary and proportionate on the grounds that the other aspects of the sectoral reform did not involve any State aid (recital 146 of the Decision).
Komisija je dodeljeno pomoč, „glede na tako panožno reorganizacijo“ označila kot potrebno in proporcionalno na podlagi dejstva, da drugi vidiki panožne reforme niso vključevali nobene državne pomoči (uvodna izjava 146 Odločbe).
Although in the present case the Greek State does not compensate OTE for past pension liabilities, nor is the measure aimed at a wider sectoral reorganisation, the principles laid down in EDF are applicable by analogy.
Čeprav v tem primeru grška država ne nadomesti preteklih pokojninskih obveznosti družbe OTE in ukrep ni usmerjen v širšo panožno reorganizacijo, smiselno veljajo načela iz EDF.
Namely, 19623315,16 × OTE share price.
To pomeni 19623315,16 × borzni tečaj OTE.
Quite the reverse, by a series of legislative acts from 1994 to 2001 (Laws No 2257/1994, 2768/1999, 2843/2000 and 2937/2001), the Greek State required OTE to make certain ad hoc (capped) payments to TAP-OTE in order to cover the pension fund’s operating deficits.
Ravno nasprotno je grška država s številnimi zakonodajnimi akti med letoma 1994 in 2001 (zakoni št. 2257/1994, 2768/1999, 2843/2000 in 2937/2001) od družbe OTE zahtevala nekatera začasna plačila v TAP-OTE, da bi se pokril primanjkljaj iz rednega poslovanja pokojninskega sklada.
More particularly, in 2001 OTE was obliged by law to pay a lump sum of GDR 120 billion (around EUR 4 billion) to cover TAP-OTE’s deficits calculated for the years 2002-2011.
Leta 2001 je morala družba OTE po zakonu plačati pavšalni znesek 120 milijard GDR (okoli 4 milijarde EUR), da bi pokrila primanjkljaj TAP-OTE, izračunan za leta od 2002 do 2011.
Since OTE had no obligation whatsoever to guarantee the viability of TAP-OTE, these were payments made over and above OTE’s own pension contributions as an employer.
Ker družba OTE ni imela nobenih obveznosti, da zagotovi sposobnost preživetja TAP-OTE, so bila ta plačila opravljena poleg lastnih pokojninskih prispevkov družbe OTE kot delodajalca.
See Commission Decisions (no comments), Case EL/2006/0493: call origination on the public telephone network provided at fixed location, Case EL/2006/0494: call origination on individual public telephone networks provided at fixed location, and Case EL/2006/0495: transit services in the fixed public telephone network. http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/infso/ecctf/library?l=/ellda/adopted_measures&vm = detailed&sb = Title
Glej odločbe Komisije (Brez pripomb), zadeva EL/2006/0493: izvor klica v javnem telefonskem omrežju na fiksni lokaciji, zadeva EL/2006/0494: izvor klica na posameznih javnih telefonskih omrežjih na fiksni lokaciji in zadeva EL/2006/0495: tranzitne storitve v fiksnem javnem telefonskem omrežju. http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/infso/ecctf/library?l=/ellda/adopted_measures&vm = detailed&sb = Title
Commission Decision (no comments) Case EL/2006/0372: wholesale broadband access in Greece.
Odločba Komisije (Brez pripomb), zadeva EL/2006/0372: veleprodajni trg širokopasovnega dostopa v Grčiji.
Commission Decision (no comments) Case EL/2006/0491: the minimum set of leased lines in Greece.
Odločba Komisije (Brez pripomb), zadeva EL/2006/0491: minimalni nabor zakupljenih vodov v Grčiji.
Pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC, the Commission has also examined the above mentioned decisions and remedies imposed by the regulatory authority on OTE and has not expressed any serious doubts as to their compatibility with Community law and in particular with the objectives referred to in Article 8(2)(b) of the Framework Directive, including the obligation on national regulatory authorities to ensure, through their decision-making powers ‘that there is no distortion or restriction of competition in the electronic communications market’.
Na podlagi člena 7(3) Direktive 2002/21/ES je Komisija preučila tudi zgoraj navedene odločitve in ukrepe, ki jih je regulativni organ izrekel družbi OTE, in ni izrazila nobenih resnih dvomov v zvezi z njihovo združljivostjo z zakonodajo Skupnosti in še posebno s cilji iz člena 8(2)(b) okvirne direktive, vključno z obvezo državnih regulativnih organov, da s svojo pristojnostjo odločanja „zagotovijo, da v sektorju elektronskih komunikacij ni izkrivljanja ali omejevanja konkurence“.
Thus, on 29 November 2006, the regulatory authority fined OTE a total of EUR 3 million, that is EUR 1000000 for breach of the existing regulatory framework (carrier pre-selection) and EUR 2000000 for an abuse of a dominant position (refusal to provide network access, leverage of market power, and abuse of a relation of economic dependency).
novembra 2006 je regulativni organ družbo OTE oglobil za 3 milijone EUR, 1000000 EUR za kršitev obstoječega regulativnega okvira (predizbira ponudnika) in 2000000 EUR za zlorabo prevladujočega položaja (zavrnitev zagotavljanja mrežnega dostopa, prenos tržne moči in zloraba razmerja gospodarske odvisnosti).
Finally, on 2 March 2007, in the context of an injunction relief procedure, the authority issued two temporary orders, following a request filed by a number of alternative providers which OTE threatened with interconnection interruption, invoking the fact that these providers allegedly owed OTE significant debts.
V okviru postopka oprostitve sodne prepovedi je 2. marca 2007 organ po sprejetju zahtev številnih drugih ponudnikov, ki jim je družba OTE grozila s prekinitvijo povezav, sklicujoč se na dejstvo, da naj bi ti ponudniki veliko dolgovali družbi OTE, izdal dve začasni odredbi.
The measure temporarily prohibits OTE from interrupting the interconnection until the authority has decided on whether OTE’s claims are founded in the context of a dispute settlement procedure in accordance with the current regulatory framework.
Ta ukrep družbi OTE začasno prepoveduje prekinitev povezav, dokler organ ne odloči, ali so zahteve družbe OTE utemeljene v okviru postopka reševanja sporov v skladu s trenutnim regulativnim okvirom.
See press release issued by EETT on 2 March 2007.
Glej sporočilo za javnost EETT z dne 2. marca 2007.
As the Greek authorities have confirmed, even if it is true that OTE did not pay the tax in the past, it has always been in the same position as its competitors since no other telecommunication service provider was liable to pay the tax under Greek law.
Kot so potrdili grški organi, je bila družba OTE, čeprav da v preteklosti res ni plačevala davkov, vedno v enakem položaju kot njeni konkurenti, saj nobenemu drugemu ponudniku telekomunikacijskih storitev ni bilo treba plačevati davka po grškem zakonu.
In accordance with Article 19(2) of Law No 1264/1982, public undertakings or utilities were exempted from the payment of the advertisement tax.
V skladu s členom 19(2) Zakona št. 1264/1982 so bila javna podjetja ali javne gospodarske družbe oproščena plačila davka na oglaševanje.
In 2005, the Administrative Court of First Instance (Decision No 9564/2005), ruled that the notions of ‘public service’ and ‘utilities’ in Law No 1264/1982 should be interpreted as meaning that any licensed telecoms operator providing telecommunications services is eligible for exemption from the advertising tax irrespective of its status as a public or private company.
Leta 2005 je Upravno sodišče prve stopnje (Odločba št. 9564/2005) odločilo, da je treba pojme, kot sta „javne storitve“ in „javne gospodarske službe“ iz Zakona št. 1264/1982 razumeti, kot da vsa telekomunikacijska podjetja, ki nudijo telekomunikacijske storitve, izpolnjujejo pogoje za izvzetje od plačila davka na oglaševanje ne glede na njihov status kot javno ali zasebno podjetje.
As a result, the exemption did not put OTE in any advantageous position vis-à-vis its competitors.
Posledično izvzetje ni predstavljalo nobene ugodnosti za družbo OTE v primerjavi z njenimi konkurenti.
Under this scenario, the extra burden is reduced to EUR 390,4 million. The second scenario assumes that there is no tax deductibility.
Po tem scenariju se dodatni stroški znižajo na 390,4 milijone EUR. Drugi scenarij ne predvideva odbitka davka.
Under this scenario, the extra burden increases to EUR 540,2 million when using the OTE’s WACC, and to EUR 643,4 million when using the risk-free discount rate of 3 %.
Po tem scenariju se dodatna obremenitev pri uporabi tehtanega povprečja stroškov kapitala podjetja OTE zviša na 540,2 milijona EUR in na 643,4 milijona EUR pri uporabi 3-odstotne netvegane diskontne stopnje.
In its submission, the third party stated that OTE has been exempted from the payment of the advertisement tax that other companies have to pay for every advertisement they place on any medium.
V svoji predložitvi je tretja stranka navedla, da je bila družba OTE oproščena plačila davka na oglaševanje, ki ga morajo plačati vsa druga podjetja za vsak oglas, ki ga objavijo v katerem koli sredstvu javnega obveščanja.
The Commission considers that in principle such measures should be examined separately and not in the context of this procedure.
Komisija meni, da je treba take ukrepe preučiti posebej in ne v kontekstu tega postopka.
on State aid C 37/05 (ex NN 11/04) implemented by Greece — tax-exempt reserve fund
o državni pomoči C 37/05 (ex NN 11/04) Grčije – Davkov oproščeni rezervni sklad
(notified under document number C(2008) 3251)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 3251)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provision cited above [1],
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi členi [1],
Based on information collected by the Commission, Greece was requested by letter dated 22 October 2003 (D/56772), to provide information about several measures included in a draft law on ‘Development and social policy measures — Objectivity of tax controls and other provisions’, with a view to establish the extent to which they constitute aid within the meaning of Article 87 of the EC Treaty.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je Komisija zbrala, je z dopisom z dne 22. oktobra 2003 (D/56772) zaprosila Grčijo, naj posreduje informacije o več ukrepih iz osnutka zakona „Ukrepi za razvoj in socialno politiko – objektivnost davčnega nadzora in druge določbe“, da bi ugotovila, v kolikšnem obsegu pomenijo pomoč v smislu člena 87 Pogodbe ES.
Under the provisions of one of these draft measures, certain companies are allowed to set up a special tax-free reserve fund of up to 35 % of their profits in order to carry out investments of an equal amount.
V skladu z določbami enega od osnutkov ukrepov lahko nekatera podjetja ustanovijo poseben rezervni sklad, oproščen davkov, v višini do 35 % svojega dobička, da bi izvajala naložbe v enaki višini.
The Commission also reminded Greece of its obligation to notify the Commission of any measures constituting aid before their implementation, pursuant to Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty.
Komisija je Grčijo tudi spomnila, da jo mora na podlagi člena 88(3) Pogodbe ES pred izvajanjem vseh ukrepov, ki pomenijo pomoč, uradno obvestiti o njih.
By letter dated 27 November 2003 (A/38170) the Greek authorities provided some of the information requested.
Z dopisom z dne 27. novembra 2003 (A/38170) so grški organi posredovali nekatere informacije, za katere je prosila Komisija.