natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
OJ C 10, 15.1.2008, p. 57.
UL C 10, 15.1.2008, str. 57.
Opinion of the European Parliament of 5 June 2008 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and Council Decision of 20 October 2008.
Mnenje Evropskega parlamenta z dne 5. junija 2008 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in Sklep Sveta z dne 20. oktobra 2008.
List of prohibited substances:
Seznam prepovedanih snovi:
List A: prohibited substances
Seznam A: prepovedane snovi
Thyrostatic substances,
tirostatične snovi,
Stilbenes, stilbene derivatives, their salts and esters,
stilbeni, derivati stilbenov, njihove soli in estri,
Oestradiol 17β and its ester-like derivatives.
estradiol 17β in njegovi estrom podobni derivati.
List B: prohibited substances with derogations
Seznam B: prepovedane snovi z odstopanji
Beta-agonists’
beta-agonisti.“
Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2008/98/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on waste and repealing certain Directives
o odpadkih in razveljavitvi nekaterih direktiv
Directive 2006/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on waste [4] establishes the legislative framework for the handling of waste in the Community.
Direktiva 2006/12/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. aprila 2006 o odpadkih [4] vzpostavlja zakonodajni okvir za ravnanje z odpadki znotraj Skupnosti.
It defines key concepts such as waste, recovery and disposal and puts in place the essential requirements for the management of waste, notably an obligation for an establishment or undertaking carrying out waste management operations to have a permit or to be registered and an obligation for the Member States to draw up waste management plans.
Opredeljuje ključne pojme, kot so odpadek, predelava in odstranjevanje, ter vzpostavlja temeljne zahteve za ravnanje z odpadki, zlasti obveznost za ustanovo ali podjetje, ki izvaja postopke ravnanja z odpadki, da mora imeti dovoljenje oziroma se mora registrirati, in obveznost za države članice, da morajo izdelati načrte ravnanja z odpadki.
It also establishes major principles such as an obligation to handle waste in a way that does not have a negative impact on the environment or human health, an encouragement to apply the waste hierarchy and, in accordance with the polluter-pays principle, a requirement that the costs of disposing of waste must be borne by the holder of waste, by previous holders or by the producers of the product from which the waste came.
Poleg tega vzpostavlja glavna načela, kot je obveznost ravnanja z odpadki brez negativnega vpliva na okolje ali zdravje ljudi, spodbujanje upoštevanja hierarhije ravnanja z odpadki ter načelo, da plača povzročitelj obremenitve, v skladu s katerim mora stroške odstranjevanja odpadkov kriti imetnik odpadkov ali prejšnji imetniki ali proizvajalci proizvodov, od katerih odpadki izvirajo.
Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme [5] calls for the development or revision of the legislation on waste, including a clarification of the distinction between waste and non-waste, and for the development of measures regarding waste prevention and management, including the setting of targets.
Sklep št. 1600/2002/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. julija 2002 o šestem okoljskem akcijskem programu Skupnosti [5] poziva k pripravi ali reviziji zakonodaje o odpadkih, vključno s pojasnitvijo razlike med odpadki in snovmi ali predmeti, ki niso odpadki, ter oblikovanju ukrepov za preprečevanje nastajanja odpadkov in ravnanje z njimi, vključno z določanjem ciljev.
The Commission communication of 27 May 2003 towards a Thematic Strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste noted the need to assess the existing definitions of recovery and disposal, the need for a generally applicable definition of recycling and a debate on the definition of waste.
V sporočilu Komisije z dne 27. maja 2003 z naslovom „Tematski strategiji za preprečevanje nastajanja in recikliranje odpadkov naproti“ je bila navedena potreba po presoji obstoječih opredelitev predelave in odstranjevanja ter potreba po splošno uporabni opredelitvi recikliranja in razpravi o opredelitvi odpadka.
In its resolution of 20 April 2004 on the abovementioned communication [6], the European Parliament called on the Commission to consider extending Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control [7] to the waste sector as a whole.
Evropski parlament je v resoluciji z dne 20. aprila 2004 o zgoraj omenjenem sporočilu [6] Komisijo pozval, naj preuči možnost razširitve Direktive Sveta 96/61/ES z dne 24. septembra 1996 o celovitem preprečevanju in nadzorovanju onesnaževanja [7] na celoten sektor odpadkov.
It also asked the Commission to differentiate clearly between recovery and disposal and to clarify the distinction between waste and non-waste.
Prav tako je Komisijo pozval, naj jasno razlikuje med predelavo in odstranjevanjem ter pojasni razliko med odpadki in snovmi ali predmeti, ki niso odpadki.
In its conclusions of 1 July 2004, the Council called on the Commission to bring forward a proposal for the revision of certain aspects of Directive 75/442/EEC, repealed and replaced by Directive 2006/12/EC, in order to clarify the distinction between waste and non-waste and that between recovery and disposal.
Svet je v sklepih z dne 1. julija 2004 Komisijo pozval, naj predloži predlog za revizijo nekaterih vidikov Direktive 75/442/EGS, ki je bila razveljavljena in nadomeščena z Direktivo 2006/12/ES, da bi se pojasnila razlika med odpadki in snovmi ali predmeti, ki niso odpadki ter razlika med predelavo in odstranjevanjem.
The first objective of any waste policy should be to minimise the negative effects of the generation and management of waste on human health and the environment.
Prvi cilj vsake politike ravnanja z odpadki bi moral biti zmanjšanje škodljivih vplivov nastajanja odpadkov in ravnanja z njimi na zdravje ljudi in okolje.
Waste policy should also aim at reducing the use of resources, and favour the practical application of the waste hierarchy.
Obenem bi moral biti njen cilj zmanjšanje uporabe virov in spodbujanje praktične uporabe hierarhije ravnanja z odpadki.
In its Resolution of 24 February 1997 on a Community strategy for waste management [8], the Council confirmed that waste prevention should be the first priority of waste management, and that re-use and material recycling should be preferred to energy recovery from waste, where and insofar as they are the best ecological options.
Svet je v resoluciji z dne 24. februarja 1997 o strategiji Komisije za ravnanje z odpadki [8] potrdil, da bi moralo biti preprečevanje nastajanja odpadkov najpomembnejša naloga pri ravnanju z odpadki, medtem ko bi bilo treba ponovni uporabi in recikliranju materialov dati prednost pred energetsko predelavo odpadkov, kjer in kolikor sta to najboljši ekološki možnosti.
It is therefore necessary to revise Directive 2006/12/EC in order to clarify key concepts such as the definitions of waste, recovery and disposal, to strengthen the measures that must be taken in regard to waste prevention, to introduce an approach that takes into account the whole life-cycle of products and materials and not only the waste phase, and to focus on reducing the environmental impacts of waste generation and waste management, thereby strengthening the economic value of waste.
Treba je torej revidirati Direktivo 2006/12/ES zaradi pojasnitve ključnih pojmov, kot so opredelitve odpadka, predelave in odstranjevanja, zaradi poostritve ukrepov, ki jih je treba sprejeti za preprečevanje nastajanja odpadkov, uvedbe pristopa, ki upošteva celoten življenjski krog proizvodov in materialov in ne samo fazo odpadkov, ter osredotočenja na zmanjšanje vplivov nastajanja odpadkov in ravnanja z njimi na okolje, s tem pa bi se okrepila ekonomska vrednost odpadkov.
Furthermore, the recovery of waste and the use of recovered materials should be encouraged in order to conserve natural resources.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba zaradi ohranjanja naravnih virov spodbujati predelavo odpadkov in uporabo predelanih materialov.
In the interests of clarity and readability, Directive 2006/12/EC should be repealed and replaced by a new directive.
Zaradi jasnosti in razumljivosti bi bilo treba Direktivo 2006/12/ES razveljaviti in nadomestiti z novo direktivo.
Since most significant waste management operations are now covered by Community legislation in the field of environment, it is important that this Directive be adapted to that approach.
Ker so najpomembnejši postopki ravnanja z odpadki sedaj zajeti v okoljski zakonodaji Skupnosti, je pomembno, da se ta direktiva prilagodi temu pristopu.
An emphasis on the environmental objectives laid down in Article 174 of the Treaty would bring the environmental impacts of waste generation and waste management more sharply into focus throughout the life-cycle of resources.
Poudarek na okoljskih ciljih, določenih v členu 174 Pogodbe, bi omogočil boljšo osredotočenost na to, kako nastajanje odpadkov in ravnanje z njimi vpliva na okolje v celotnem življenjskem krogu virov.
Consequently, the legal basis for this Directive should be Article 175.
Posledično bi morala biti pravna podlaga za to direktivo člen 175.
Effective and consistent rules on waste treatment should be applied, subject to certain exceptions, to movable property which the holder discards or intends or is required to discard.
Za premičnine, ki jih imetnik zavrže ali namerava ali mora zavreči, bi bilo treba ob upoštevanju nekaterih izjem uporabiti učinkovita in dosledna pravila o obdelavi odpadkov.
The waste status of uncontaminated excavated soils and other naturally occurring material which are used on sites other than the one from which they were excavated should be considered in accordance with the definition of waste and the provisions on by-products or on the end of waste status under this Directive.
Status odpadka neonesnažene izkopane zemlje in drugega naravno prisotnega materiala, ki se uporabljata na mestih, kjer nista bila izkopana, se določi v skladu z opredelitvijo odpadka in določbami o stranskih proizvodih ali o prenehanju statusa odpadka po tej direktivi.
Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 October 2002 laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption [9] provides, inter alia, for proportionate controls as regards the collection, transport, processing, use and disposal of all animal by-products including waste of animal origin, preventing it from presenting a risk to animal and public health.
Uredba (ES) št. 1774/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 3. oktobra 2002 določa zdravstvena pravila za živalske stranske proizvode, ki niso namenjeni prehrani ljudi [9] in med drugim določa proporcionalni nadzor zbiranja, prevoza, predelave, uporabe in odstranjevanja vseh živalskih stranskih proizvodov, vključno z odpadki živalskega porekla, ter preprečuje, da bi odpadki predstavljali nevarnost za zdravje živali in ljudi.
It is therefore necessary to clarify the link with that Regulation, avoiding duplication of rules by excluding from the scope of this Directive animal by-products where they are intended for uses that are not considered waste operations.
Zato je treba pojasniti povezavo z navedeno uredbo, se izogniti podvajanju predpisov z izključitvijo živalskih stranskih proizvodov iz področja uporabe te direktive, kadar so namenjeni uporabi, ki ne šteje za postopke ravnanja z odpadki.
In the light of the experience gained in applying Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002, it is appropriate to clarify the scope of waste legislation and of its provisions on hazardous waste as regards animal by-products regulated by Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002.
Glede na izkušnje, pridobljene pri uporabi Uredbe (ES) št. 1774/2002, je ustrezno pojasniti področje uporabe zakonodaje o odpadkih in njenih določb o nevarnih odpadkih v zvezi s živalskimi stranskimi proizvodi, kakor jih ureja Uredba (ES) št. 1774/2002.
Where animal by-products pose potential health risks, the appropriate legal instrument to address these risks is Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 and unnecessary overlaps with waste legislation should be avoided.
Kadar živalski stranski proizvodi predstavljajo morebitno tveganje za zdravje, je Uredba (ES) št. 1774/2002 ustrezen pravni instrument za obravnavo teh tveganj, ob tem pa bi se bilo treba izogniti nepotrebnemu prekrivanju z zakonodajo o odpadkih.
The classification of waste as hazardous waste should be based, inter alia, on the Community legislation on chemicals, in particular concerning the classification of preparations as hazardous, including concentration limit values used for that purpose.
Uvrstitev odpadkov med nevarne odpadke bi morala med drugim temeljiti na zakonodaji Skupnosti o kemikalijah, zlasti glede uvrstitve pripravkov med nevarne, vključno z v ta namen uporabljenimi mejnimi koncentracijskimi vrednostmi.
Hazardous waste should be regulated under strict specifications in order to prevent or limit, as far as possible, the potential negative effects on the environment and on human health due to inappropriate management.
Za nevarne odpadke bi morale veljati stroge specifikacije, da se čim bolj preprečijo ali omejijo možni škodljivi vplivi na okolje ali zdravje ljudi zaradi neustreznega ravnanja.
Furthermore, it is necessary to maintain the system by which waste and hazardous waste have been classified in accordance with the list of the types of waste as last established by Commission Decision 2000/532/EC [10], in order to encourage a harmonised classification of waste and ensure the harmonised determination of hazardous waste within the Community.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba ohraniti sistem, s katerim so bili odpadki in nevarni odpadki uvrščeni v skladu s seznamom odpadkov, kakor je bil nazadnje oblikovan z Odločbo Komisije 2000/532/ES [10], da bi se spodbudilo usklajeno uvrščanje odpadkov in zagotovila usklajena določitev nevarnih odpadkov v Skupnosti.
It is necessary to distinguish between the preliminary storage of waste pending its collection, the collection of waste and the storage of waste pending treatment.
Treba bi bilo razlikovati med predhodnim skladiščenjem odpadkov do zbiranja, zbiranjem odpadkov in skladiščenjem odpadkov do obdelave.
Establishments or undertakings that produce waste in the course of their activities should not be regarded as engaged in waste management and subject to authorisation for the storage of their waste pending its collection.
Ustanov ali podjetij, ki med izvajanjem svojih dejavnosti povzročajo nastajanje odpadkov, se ne bi smelo obravnavati, kot da sodelujejo pri ravnanju z odpadki in kot da za skladiščenje lastnih odpadkov do njihovega zbiranja potrebujejo dovoljenje.
Preliminary storage of waste within the definition of collection is understood as a storage activity pending its collection in facilities where waste is unloaded in order to permit its preparation for further transport for recovery or disposal elsewhere.
Predhodno skladiščenje odpadkov v okviru opredelitve zbiranja se razume kot dejavnost skladiščenja do zbiranja odpadkov v objektih, kjer se odpadki raztovorijo, da se lahko pripravijo za nadaljnji prevoz za predelavo ali odstranjevanje na drugem mestu.
The distinction between preliminary storage of waste pending collection and the storage of waste pending treatment should be made, in view of the objective of this Directive, according to the type of waste, the size and time period of storage and the objective of the collection.
Glede na cilj te direktive bi bilo treba ob upoštevanju vrste odpadkov, obsega in trajanja skladiščenja ter cilja zbiranja razlikovati med predhodnim skladiščenjem odpadkov do zbiranja in skladiščenja odpadkov pred obdelavo.
This distinction should be made by the Member States.
Takšno razlikovanje bi morale izvesti države članice.
The storage of waste prior to recovery for a period of three years or longer and the storage of waste prior to disposal for a period of one year or longer is subject to Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste [11].
Skladiščenje odpadkov pred predelavo za obdobje treh let ali več in skladiščenje odpadkov pred odstranjevanjem za obdobje enega leta ali več je urejeno z Direktivo Sveta 1999/31/ES z dne 26. aprila 1999 o odlaganju odpadkov na odlagališčih [11].
Waste collection schemes which are not conducted on a professional basis should not be subject to registration as they present a lower risk and contribute to the separate collection of waste.
Sistemov zbiranja odpadkov, ki se ne izvajajo poklicno, se ne bi smelo registrirati, saj predstavljajo manjše tveganje in prispevajo k ločenemu zbiranju odpadkov.
Examples of such schemes are waste medicines collected by pharmacies, take-back schemes in shops for consumer goods and community schemes in schools.
Primeri takšnih sistemov so zbiranje odpadnih zdravil v lekarnah, sistemi „vzemi nazaj“ za blago za široko porabo v trgovinah in sistemi lokalnih skupnosti v šolah.
Definitions of prevention, re-use, preparing for re-use, treatment and recycling should be included in this Directive, in order to clarify the scope of these concepts.
V to direktivo bi bilo treba vključiti opredelitve preprečevanja nastajanja, ponovne uporabe, priprave za ponovno uporabo, obdelave in recikliranja, da bi se pojasnilo področje uporabe teh pojmov.
The definitions of recovery and disposal need to be modified in order to ensure a clear distinction between the two concepts, based on a genuine difference in environmental impact through the substitution of natural resources in the economy and recognising the potential benefits to the environment and human health of using waste as a resource.
Opredelitvi predelave in odstranjevanja je treba spremeniti, da bi se zagotovilo jasno razlikovanje med obema pojmoma, ki bi temeljilo na dejanskem razlikovanju med vplivi na okolje z nadomestitvijo naravnih virov v gospodarstvu in priznavanjem, da ima uporaba odpadkov kot vira potencialne koristi za okolje in zdravje ljudi.
In addition, guidelines may be developed in order to clarify cases where this distinction is difficult to apply in practice or where the classification of the activity as recovery does not match the real environmental impact of the operation.
Poleg tega se lahko oblikujejo smernice za pojasnitev primerov, v katerih je to razlikovanje težko uporabiti v praksi ali v katerih uvrstitev dejavnosti med predelavo ne ustreza dejanskim okoljskim vplivom postopka.
This Directive should also clarify when the incineration of municipal solid waste is energy-efficient and may be considered a recovery operation.
V tej direktivi bi bilo treba pojasniti, kdaj je sežig trdnih komunalnih odpadkov energetsko učinkovit in se ga lahko šteje za predelavo.
Disposal operations consisting of release to seas and oceans including sea bed insertion are also regulated by international conventions, in particular the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, done at London on 13 November 1972, and the 1996 Protocol thereto as amended in 2006.
Postopke odstranjevanja, ki vključujejo izpuščanje v morja in oceane, vključno z odlaganjem na morsko dno, prav tako urejajo mednarodne konvencije, in zlasti Konvencija o preprečevanju onesnaževanja morja z odlaganjem odpadkov in drugih snovi z dne 13. novembra 1972 v Londonu in njen Protokol iz leta 1996, kakor je bil spremenjen leta 2006.
There should be no confusion between the various aspects of the waste definition, and appropriate procedures should be applied, where necessary, to by-products that are not waste, on the one hand, or to waste that ceases to be waste, on the other hand.
Različni vidiki opredelitve odpadka se med seboj ne bi smeli zamenjevati, hkrati pa bi bilo po potrebi treba uporabiti ustrezne postopke, na eni strani za stranske proizvode, ki niso odpadki, ali, na drugi strani, za odpadke, ki prenehajo biti odpadki.
In order to specify certain aspects of the definition of waste, this Directive should clarify:
Za razjasnitev nekaterih vidikov opredelitve odpadka bi bilo treba v tej direktivi pojasniti:
when substances or objects resulting from a production process not primarily aimed at producing such substances or objects are by-products and not waste.
kdaj so snovi ali predmeti, ki nastanejo pri proizvodnem procesu, katerega glavni namen ni proizvodnja takšnih snovi ali predmetov, stranski proizvodi in ne odpadki.
The decision that a substance is not waste can be taken only on the basis of a coordinated approach, to be regularly updated, and where this is consistent with the protection of the environment and human health.
Odločitev, da neka snov ni odpadek, se lahko sprejme le na podlagi usklajenega pristopa, ki se redno posodablja, in kadar je to skladno z varstvom okolja in zdravja ljudi.
If the use of a by-product is allowed under an environmental licence or general environmental rules, this can be used by Member States as a tool to decide that no overall adverse environmental or human health impacts are expected to occur; an object or substance should be regarded as being a by-product only when certain conditions are met.
Če je uporaba stranskega proizvoda dovoljena z okoljskim dovoljenjem ali splošnimi okoljskimi predpisi, lahko države članice na podlagi tega določijo, da splošni škodljivi vplivi na okolje in zdravje ljudi niso pričakovani; predmet ali snov se lahko šteje za stranski proizvod le, če so izpolnjeni določeni pogoji.
Since by-products fall into the category of products, exports of by-products should meet the requirements of the relevant Community legislation; and
Ker se stranski proizvodi uvrščajo v kategorijo proizvodov, bi moral biti njihov izvoz v skladu z zahtevami ustrezne zakonodaje Skupnosti, in
when certain waste ceases to be waste, laying down end-of-waste criteria that provide a high level of environmental protection and an environmental and economic benefit; possible categories of waste for which ‘end-of-waste’ specifications and criteria should be developed are, among others, construction and demolition waste, some ashes and slags, scrap metals, aggregates, tyres, textiles, compost, waste paper and glass.
kdaj določen odpadek preneha biti odpadek, in sicer z določitvijo meril za prenehanje statusa odpadka, ki zagotavlja visoko raven varstva okolja ter koristi okolju in gospodarstvu; možne kategorije odpadkov, za katere bi bilo treba oblikovati specifikacije in merila za prenehanje statusa odpadka, med drugim predstavljajo gradbeni odpadki in odpadki pri rušenju objektov, nekateri pepeli in žlindre, odpadne kovine, agregati, pnevmatike, tekstil, kompost, odpadni papir in steklo.
For the purposes of reaching end-of-waste status, a recovery operation may be as simple as the checking of waste to verify that it fulfils the end-of-waste criteria.
Da bi se doseglo prenehanje statusa odpadka, je lahko postopek predelave enostaven – npr. pregled odpadkov, da se ugotovi, ali izpolnjujejo merila za prenehanje statusa odpadka.