natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In its resolution of 27 April 2006 [7], the European Parliament supported the Unesco Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, which states in particular that ‘cultural activities, goods and services have both an economic and a cultural nature, because they convey identities, values and meanings, and must therefore not be treated as solely having commercial value’.
Evropski parlament je v Resoluciji z dne 27. aprila 2006 [7] podprl Unescovo Konvencijo o varovanju in spodbujanju raznolikosti kulturnih izrazov, katera zlasti navaja, da imajo „kulturne dejavnosti, dobrine in storitve tako gospodarsko kot kulturno naravo, ker so nosilke identitet, vrednot in pomenov, ter se jih zato ne sme obravnavati, kot da imajo izključno tržno vrednost“.
The Council Decision 2006/515/EC of 18 May 2006 on the conclusion of the Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions [8] approved the Unesco Convention on behalf of the Community.
S Sklepom Sveta 2006/515/ES z dne 18. maja 2006 o sklenitvi Konvencije o varovanju in spodbujanju raznolikosti kulturnih izrazov [8] je bila Unescova konvencija odobrena v imenu Skupnosti.
The Convention entered into force on 18 March 2007.
Konvencija je začela veljati 18. marca 2007.
This Directive respects the principles of that Convention.
Ta direktiva spoštuje načela te konvencije.
Traditional audiovisual media services — such as television — and emerging on-demand audiovisual media services offer significant employment opportunities in the Community, particularly in small and medium-sized enterprises, and stimulate economic growth and investment.
Tradicionalne avdiovizualne medijske storitve – kakršna je televizija – in nastajajoče avdiovizualne medijske storitve na zahtevo ponujajo veliko možnosti za zaposlitev v Skupnosti, zlasti v malih in srednje velikih podjetjih, ter spodbujajo gospodarsko rast in naložbe.
Bearing in mind the importance of a level playing-field and a true European market for audiovisual media services, the basic principles of the internal market, such as free competition and equal treatment, should be respected in order to ensure transparency and predictability in markets for audiovisual media services and to achieve low barriers to entry.
Ob upoštevanju pomena enakih konkurenčnih pogojev in pravega evropskega trga razširjanja televizijskih programov bi bilo treba upoštevati osnovna načela notranjega trga, kakršni sta svobodna konkurenca in enako obravnavanje, da se tako zagotovi preglednost in predvidljivost trgov z avdiovizualnimi medijskimi storitvami ter se zagotovijo nizke vstopne ovire.
The basic principles of Directive 89/552/EEC, namely the country of origin principle and common minimum standards, have proved their worth and should therefore be retained.
Temeljna načela Direktive 89/552/EGS, zlasti načelo države izvora, ter skupni minimalni standardi, so se izkazala za uspešna in bi jih bilo zato treba ohraniti.
On 15 December 2003, the Commission adopted a Communication on the future of European regulatory audiovisual policy, in which it stressed that regulatory policy in that sector has to safeguard certain public interests, such as cultural diversity, the right to information, media pluralism, the protection of minors and consumer protection and to enhance public awareness and media literacy, now and in the future.
Komisija je 15. decembra 2003 sprejela Sporočilo o prihodnosti evropske regulativne avdiovizualne politike, v katerem poudarja, da mora regulativna politika v tem sektorju sedaj in v prihodnosti zaščititi nekatere javne interese, kakršni so kulturna raznolikost, pravica do informacij, pluralnost medijev, varstvo mladoletnikov in potrošnikov, ter povečati osveščenost javnosti in medijsko pismenost.
The Resolution of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council of 25 January 1999 concerning public service broadcasting [9] reaffirmed that the fulfilment of the mission of public service broadcasting requires that it continue to benefit from technological progress.
V Resoluciji Sveta in predstavnikov vlad držav članic, ki so se sestali v okviru Sveta, o storitvah javne radiotelevizije [9] je bilo znova potrjeno, da mora tehnološki napredek še naprej koristiti izpolnjevanju poslanstva javne radiodifuzije.
The co-existence of private and public audiovisual media service providers is a feature which distinguishes the European audiovisual media market.
Soobstoj zasebnih in javnih ponudnikov avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev je ena od posebnosti evropskega avdiovizualnega medijskega trga.
The Commission has adopted the initiative ‘i2010: European Information Society’ to foster growth and jobs in the information society and media industries.
Komisija je sprejela pobudo „i2010: Evropska informacijska družba“ za spodbujanje gospodarske rasti in zaposlovanja v informacijski družbi in medijski industriji.
This is a comprehensive strategy designed to encourage the production of European content, the development of the digital economy and the uptake of ICT, against the background of the convergence of information society services and media services, networks and devices, by modernising and deploying all EU policy instruments: regulatory instruments, research and partnerships with industry.
Pobuda i2010 je celovita strategija, namenjena spodbujanju produkcije evropskih vsebin, razvoju digitalnega gospodarstva in sprejemanja IKT, glede na zbliževanje storitev informacijske družbe in medijskih storitev, mrež in naprav, s posodabljanjem in uporabo vseh političnih instrumentov EU: regulativnih instrumentov, raziskav in partnerstva z industrijo.
The Commission has committed itself to creating a consistent internal market framework for information society services and media services by modernising the legal framework for audiovisual services, starting with a Commission proposal in 2005 to modernise the Television without Frontiers Directive and transform it into a Directive on Audiovisual Media Services.
Komisija se je zavezala k oblikovanju skladnega okvira notranjega trga za storitve informacijske družbe in medijske storitve s posodabljanjem pravnega okvira za avdiovizualne storitve, ki se je začelo s predlogom Komisije leta 2005 o posodobitvi Direktive o televiziji brez meja in njenem preoblikovanju v Direktivo o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah.
The goal of the i2010 initiative will in principle be achieved by allowing industries to grow with only the necessary regulation, as well as allowing small start-up businesses, which are the wealth and job creators of the future, to flourish, innovate and create employment in a free market.
Cilj pobude i2010 bo načeloma dosežen tako, da se industriji le z nujnim urejanjem omogoči rast ter novoustanovljenim malim podjetjem, ki bodo v prihodnosti zagotavljala blaginjo in delovna mesta, omogoči, da na prostem trgu cvetijo, uvajajo inovacije in ustvarjajo nova delovna mesta.
The European Parliament adopted on 4 September 2003 [10], 22 April 2004 [11] and 6 September 2005 [12] resolutions which called for the adaptation of Directive 89/552/EEC to reflect structural changes and technological developments while fully respecting its underlying principles, which remain valid.
Evropski parlament je 4. septembra 2003 [10], 22. aprila 2004 [11] in 6. septembra 2005 [12] sprejel resolucije, ki so pozivale k prilagoditvi Direktive 89/552/EGS strukturnim spremembam in tehnološkemu razvoju ob popolnem upoštevanju njenih osnovnih načel, ki še vedno veljajo.
In addition, it in principle supported the general approach of basic rules for all audiovisual media services and additional rules for television broadcasting.
Poleg tega načeloma podpirajo splošni pristop temeljnih predpisov za vse avdiovizualne medijske storitve in dodatnih pravil za razširjanje televizijskih programov.
This Directive enhances compliance with fundamental rights and is fully in line with the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union [13], in particular Article 11 thereof.
Ta direktiva krepi spoštovanje temeljnih pravic in je v celoti v skladu z načeli, ki jih priznava Listina o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije [13], zlasti člen 11 Listine.
In this regard, this Directive should not in any way prevent Member States from applying their constitutional rules relating to freedom of the press and freedom of expression in the media.
V zvezi s tem ta direktiva nikakor ne bi smela preprečevati državam članicam, da uporabljajo svoja ustavna pravila v zvezi s svobodo tiska in svobodo izražanja v medijih.
This Directive should not affect the obligations on Member States arising from the application of Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations [14] and of rules on Information Society services.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela vplivati na obveznosti držav članic, ki izhajajo iz uporabe Direktive 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. junija 1998 o določitvi postopka za zbiranje informacij na področju tehničnih standardov in tehničnih predpisov [14] o storitvah informacijske družbe.
Accordingly, draft national measures applicable to on-demand audiovisual media services of a stricter or more detailed nature than those required to simply transpose this Directive should be subject to the procedural obligations established under Article 8 of Directive 98/34/EC.
V skladu s tem bi morale za osnutek nacionalnih ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za avdiovizualne medijske storitve na zahtevo in so strožje ali natančnejše narave od tistih, ki se zahtevajo zgolj za prenos te direktive, veljati postopkovne obveznosti iz člena 8 Direktive 98/34/ES.
Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) [15] according to its Article 1(3) is without prejudice to measures taken at Community or national level, to pursue general interest objectives, in particular relating to content regulation and audiovisual policy.
Direktiva 2002/21/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve (okvirna direktiva) [15] v skladu z njenim členom 1(3) ne posega v ukrepe, ki so sprejeti na ravni Skupnosti ali na nacionalni ravni in katerih cilj je varstvo splošnih interesov, zlasti ne v ukrepe, ki zadevajo urejanje vsebin in avdiovizualno politiko.
No provision of this Directive should require or encourage Member States to impose new systems of licensing or administrative authorisation on any type of audiovisual media service.
Nobena določba te direktive ne bi smela od držav članic zahtevati ali jih spodbujati, da uvedejo nove sisteme podeljevanja dovoljenj ali upravnih pooblastil za katero koli vrsto avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev.
For the purposes of this Directive, the definition of an audiovisual media service should cover only audiovisual media services, whether television broadcasting or on-demand, which are mass media, that is, which are intended for reception by, and which could have a clear impact on, a significant proportion of the general public.
V tej direktivi bi morala opredelitev avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev zajemati le avdiovizualne medijske storitve, tako razširjanje televizijskih programov kot avdiovizualne medijske storitve na zahtevo, ki so množični mediji, torej tiste, ki so namenjene velikemu delu splošne javnosti ter bi lahko nanjo imele precejšen vpliv.
Its scope should be limited to services as defined by the Treaty and therefore should cover any form of economic activity, including that of public service enterprises, but should not cover activities which are primarily non-economic and which are not in competition with television broadcasting, such as private websites and services consisting of the provision or distribution of audiovisual content generated by private users for the purposes of sharing and exchange within communities of interest.
Vendar bi moralo biti njeno področje uporabe omejeno na storitve, kakor so opredeljene s Pogodbo, in bi zato moralo zajemati katero koli obliko gospodarskih dejavnosti, vključno z dejavnostmi podjetij za javne storitve, vendar ne bi smelo zajemati dejavnosti, ki so v osnovi negospodarske in ki ne konkurirajo razširjanju televizijskih programov, npr. zasebna spletna mesta in storitve zagotavljanja ali distribucije avdiovizualnih vsebin, ki jih proizvajajo uporabniki za namene skupne uporabe in izmenjave znotraj interesnih skupnosti.
It is characteristic of on-demand audiovisual media services that they are ‘television-like’, i.e. that they compete for the same audience as television broadcasts, and the nature and the means of access to the service would lead the user reasonably to expect regulatory protection within the scope of this Directive.
Za avdiovizualne medijske storitve na zahtevo je značilno, da so podobne televizijskim, tj. da se potegujejo za isto občinstvo kakor razširjanje televizijskih programov, zaradi narave in načinov dostopa do storitve pa bi lahko uporabnik upravičeno pričakoval regulativno zaščito v okviru področja uporabe te direktive.
In the light of this and in order to prevent disparities as regards free movement and competition, the notion of ‘programme’ should be interpreted in a dynamic way taking into account developments in television broadcasting.
V skladu z navedenim in da bi se preprečile neenakosti glede prostega pretoka in svobodne konkurence, bi se moral zato pojem „program“ razlagati dinamično, ob upoštevanju razvoja na področju razširjanja televizijskih programov.
For the purposes of this Directive, the definition of an audiovisual media service should cover mass media in their function to inform, entertain and educate the general public, and should include audiovisual commercial communication but should exclude any form of private correspondence, such as e-mails sent to a limited number of recipients.
V tej direktivi bi morala opredelitev avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev zajemati množične medije v njihovi vlogi obveščanja, zabave in izobraževanja splošne javnosti, vključno z avdiovizualnimi komercialnimi sporočili, vendar bi morala izključevati vse oblike zasebnega dopisovanja, kakršno je elektronska pošta, poslana omejenemu številu prejemnikov.
That definition should exclude all services whose principal purpose is not the provision of programmes, i.e. where any audiovisual content is merely incidental to the service and not its principal purpose.
Ta opredelitev bi morala izključevati vse storitve, katerih glavni namen ni zagotavljanje programov, tj. kadar je avdiovizualna vsebina le naključno povezana s storitvijo in ni njen glavni namen.
Examples include websites that contain audiovisual elements only in an ancillary manner, such as animated graphical elements, short advertising spots or information related to a product or non-audiovisual service.
Sem sodijo spletne strani, pri katerih so avdiovizualni elementi le pomožna dopolnitev, na primer animirani grafični elementi, kratki oglaševalski vložki ali informacije, povezane z izdelkom ali neavdiovizualno storitvijo.
For these reasons, games of chance involving a stake representing a sum of money, including lotteries, betting and other forms of gambling services, as well as on-line games and search engines, but not broadcasts devoted to gambling or games of chance, should also be excluded from the scope of this Directive.
Zato bi morale biti s področja uporabe te direktive izvzete tudi igre na srečo z denarnim vložkom, vključno z loterijami, stavami in drugimi oblikami storitev s področja igralništva, ter spletne igre in spletni iskalniki, ne pa tudi programske vsebine, namenjene igralništvu ali igram na srečo.
For the purposes of this Directive, the definition of media service provider should exclude natural or legal persons who merely transmit programmes for which the editorial responsibility lies with third parties.
V tej direktivi bi morala opredelitev ponudnika medijskih storitev izključevati fizične ali pravne oseb, ki samo prenašajo vsebino, za katero nosijo uredniško odgovornost tretje osebe.
Television broadcasting currently includes, in particular, analogue and digital television, live streaming, webcasting and near-video-on-demand, whereas video-on-demand, for example, is an on-demand audiovisual media service.
Razširjanje televizijskih programov trenutno vključuje zlasti analogno in digitalno televizijo, neposredne prenose, spletno razširjanje televizijskih programov in nepravi video na zahtevo, pri tem ko video na zahtevo sodi denimo med avdiovizualne storitve na zahtevo.
In general, for television broadcasting or television programmes which are also offered as on-demand audiovisual media services by the same media service provider, the requirements of this Directive should be deemed to be met by the fulfilment of the requirements applicable to the television broadcast i.e. linear transmission.
Na splošno bi moralo za razširjanje televizijskih programov, ki jih isti ponudnik ponuja tudi kot avdiovizualne medijske storitve na zahtevo, veljati, da so zahteve iz te direktive izpolnjene z izpolnjevanjem zahtev, ki se uporabljajo za razširjanje televizijskih programov, tj. za linearni prenos.
However, where different kinds of services are offered in parallel, but are clearly separate services, this Directive should apply to each of the services concerned.
Vendar pa bi se ta direktiva morala uporabljati za vsako posamezno storitev, če so hkrati ponujene različne vrste storitev, ki pa so med seboj jasno ločene.
The scope of this Directive should not cover electronic versions of newspapers and magazines.
Področje uporabe te direktive ne bi smelo zajemati elektronskih različic časopisov in revij.
For the purpose of this Directive, the term ‘audiovisual’ should refer to moving images with or without sound, thus including silent films but not covering audio transmission or radio services.
V tej direktivi bi se moral izraz „avdiovizualni“ nanašati na gibljive slike z zvokom ali brez njega; vključeval bi torej neme filme, ne pa tudi zvočnega prenosa ali radijskih storitev.
While the principal purpose of an audiovisual media service is the provision of programmes, the definition of such a service should also cover text-based content which accompanies programmes, such as subtitling services and electronic programme guides.
Medtem ko je glavni namen avdiovizualne medijske storitve zagotavljanje programov, bi opredelitev takšne storitve prav tako morala zajemati na besedilu osnovano vsebino, ki spremlja takšne programe, npr. storitve podnaslavljanja in elektronske programske vodnike.
Stand-alone text-based services should not fall within the scope of this Directive, which should not affect Member States’ freedom to regulate such services at national level in accordance with the Treaty.
Samostojne, na besedilu osnovane storitve ne bi smele soditi na področje uporabe te direktive, ki ne bi smelo posegati v svobodo držav članic, da urejajo takšne storitve na nacionalni ravni v skladu s Pogodbo.
The notion of editorial responsibility is essential for defining the role of the media service provider and therefore for the definition of audiovisual media services.
Pojem uredniške odgovornosti je bistven za opredelitev vloge ponudnika medijskih storitev in s tem za opredelitev avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev.
Member States may further specify aspects of the definition of editorial responsibility, notably the notion of ‘effective control’, when adopting measures to implement this Directive.
Države članice lahko v ukrepih za izvedbo te direktive podrobneje opredelijo vidike uredniške odgovornosti, zlasti pojem „učinkovitega nadzora“.
This Directive should be without prejudice to the exemptions from liability established in Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on electronic commerce) [16].
Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v izjeme glede odgovornosti, določene v Direktivi 2000/31/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2000 o nekaterih pravnih vidikih storitev informacijske družbe, zlasti elektronskega poslovanja na notranjem trgu (Direktiva o elektronskem poslovanju) [16].
In the context of television broadcasting, the notion of simultaneous viewing should also cover quasi-simultaneous viewing because of the variations in the short time lag which occurs between the transmission and the reception of the broadcast due to technical reasons inherent in the transmission process.
V okviru razširjanja televizijskih programov bi moral pojem sočasno gledanje zajemati tudi navidezno sočasno gledanje, in sicer zaradi razlik v kratkem časovnem zamiku, ki nastane med prenašanjem in sprejemanjem televizijskih programov iz tehničnih razlogov, značilnih za postopek prenosa.
All the characteristics of an audiovisual media service set out in its definition and explained in Recitals 16 to 23 should be present at the same time.
Vse značilnosti avdiovizualne medijske storitve, določene v njeni opredelitvi in razložene v uvodnih izjavah 16 do 23, bi morale biti prisotne hkrati.
In addition to television advertising and teleshopping, a wider definition of audiovisual commercial communication should be introduced in this Directive, which however should not include public service announcements and charity appeals broadcast free of charge.
Poleg televizijskega oglaševanja in televizijske prodaje bi bilo treba v to direktivo vključiti tudi širšo opredelitev avdiovizualnih komercialnih sporočil, ki pa kljub temu ne bi smela vključevati brezplačnega prenosa oglaševanja javnih storitev in dobrodelnih akcij.
The country of origin principle should remain the core of this Directive, as it is essential for the creation of an internal market.
Načelo države izvora bi moralo ostati jedro te direktive, ker je bistveno za vzpostavitev notranjega trga.
This principle should therefore be applied to all audiovisual media services in order to ensure legal certainty for media service providers as the necessary basis for new business models and the deployment of such services.
To načelo bi se moralo zato uporabljati za vse avdiovizualne medijske storitve, da se vsem ponudnikom medijskih storitev zagotovi pravna varnost kot nujna osnova za nove poslovne modele in uvajanje takšnih storitev.
It is also essential in order to ensure the free flow of information and audiovisual programmes in the internal market.
Bistveno je tudi zato, da se zagotovi prost pretok informacij in avdiovizualnih programov na notranjem trgu.
In order to promote a strong, competitive and integrated European audiovisual industry and enhance media pluralism throughout the European Union, only one Member State should have jurisdiction over an audiovisual media service provider and pluralism of information should be a fundamental principle of the European Union.
Za spodbujanje močne, konkurenčne in povezane evropske avdiovizualne industrije ter okrepitev pluralnosti medijev po vsej Evropski uniji, bi morala biti samo ena država članica pristojna za posameznega ponudnika avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev in pluralnost informacij bi morala biti temeljno načelo Evropske unije.
Technological developments, especially with regard to digital satellite programmes, mean that subsidiary criteria should be adapted in order to ensure suitable regulation and its effective implementation and to give players genuine power over the content of an audiovisual media service.
Zaradi tehnološkega razvoja, zlasti v zvezi z digitalnimi satelitskimi programi, bi bilo treba prilagoditi merila subsidiarnosti, da se zagotovita ustrezna ureditev in učinkovito izvajanje ter resnična odgovornost nosilcev za izbiro vsebine avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev.