natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The procedure applied by the Danish Environmental Protection Agency is clearly described, as well as the criteria upon which the decisions to grant or refuse exemptions are based.
Postopek, ki ga uporablja Agencija za varstvo okolja, je jasno opisan, prav tako pa so jasno opisana merila, na katerih temeljijo odločitve za dodelitev ali zavrnitev izvzetja.
These criteria take into account the principle of proportionality.
Ta merila upoštevajo načelo sorazmernosti.
In the same vein, it is worth pointing out that the Danish Order allows the use of F-gases for the servicing and maintenance of existing equipment so as not to result in the unnecessary abandonment of equipment.
Prav tako velja poudariti, da danska odredba dovoljuje uporabo F-plinov za servisiranje in vzdrževanje obstoječe opreme, tako da ni nepotrebnega opuščanja opreme.
While noting that the Order has implications on the free circulation of goods within the Community, the Commission nevertheless draws the conclusion from the above analysis that the Order is justified from an environmental point of view and takes into consideration the implications of the envisaged bans on the internal market, reinforced by the possibility to grant individual exemptions.
Komisija opaža, da Odredba vpliva na prost pretok blaga v Skupnosti, vendar na podlagi navedene analize kljub temu ugotavlja, da je Odredba z okoljskega vidika utemeljena in da upošteva vplive predvidenih prepovedi na notranji trg, podprtih z možnostjo posameznih izvzetij.
Absence of any arbitrary discrimination, any disguised restriction of trade between Member States
Odsotnost kakršne koli samovoljne diskriminacije in kakršnega koli prikritega omejevanja trgovine med državami članicami
Pursuant to Article 95(6) of the EC Treaty, the Commission shall approve or reject the national provisions involved after having verified whether or not they are a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States.
Komisija v skladu s členom 95(6) Pogodbe ES odobri ali zavrne zadevne nacionalne določbe, potem ko preveri, ali so morda sredstvo samovoljne diskriminacije ali prikrita omejitve trgovine med državami članicami.
It should be recalled that an application pursuant to Article 95(4) of the EC Treaty must be assessed in the light of the conditions laid down in both that paragraph and paragraph 6 of that Article.
Opozoriti je treba, da je treba zahtevo v skladu s členom 95(4) Pogodbe ES presoditi glede na pogoje iz navedenega odstavka in odstavka 6 navedenega člena.
If any one of those conditions is not met, the application must be rejected without there being a need to examine the others.
Če kateri od teh pogojev ni izpolnjen, se zahteva zavrne brez potrebe, da se preverijo drugi pogoji.
The notified national provisions are general and apply to national and imported products alike.
Nacionalne določbe, o katerih je bilo poslano uradno obvestilo, so splošne in veljajo tako za nacionalne kot tudi za uvožene izdelke.
There is no evidence that the notified national provisions can be used as a means of arbitrary discrimination between economic operators in the Community.
Ni dokazov, da je nacionalne določbe, o katerih je bilo poslano uradno obvestilo, mogoče uporabiti kot sredstvo samovoljne diskriminacije med gospodarskimi subjekti v Skupnosti.
The objective behind the order is the protection of the environment, there is no indication that the Order, in its intention or implementation, would result in any arbitrary discrimination or disguised barriers to trade.
Cilj Odredbe je varstvo okolja in nič ne kaže na to, da bi namen ali izvajanje Odredbe pomenila kakršno koli samovoljno diskriminacijo ali prikrito omejevanje trgovine.
In view of the risks for the environment resulting from certain F-gases, the Commission considers that there is no evidence indicating that the national provisions notified by the Danish authorities do constitute a disproportionate obstacle to the functioning of the internal market in relation to the pursued objectives.
Glede na tveganja za okolje zaradi nekaterih F-plinov Komisija meni, da ni dokazov za to, da nacionalne določbe, o katerih so danski organi poslali uradno obvestilo, pomenijo nesorazmerno omejitev za delovanje notranjega trga v primerjavi s postavljenimi cilji.
In the light of the above considerations, and taking account of comments provided by Member States and other third parties on the notification submitted by the Danish authorities, the Commission is of the opinion that the request by Denmark, submitted on 2 June 2006, for maintaining until 31 December 2012 its national legislation more stringent than Regulation (EC) No 842/2006 with respect to the placing on the market of products and equipment containing, or whose functioning relies upon, F-gases, as, is admissible.
Glede na navedene premisleke in ob upoštevanju pripomb, ki so jih predložile države članice in tretje osebe v zvezi z uradnim obvestilom, ki so ga predložili danski organi, Komisija meni, da je zahteva Danske, predložena 2. junija 2006, za ohranitev do 31. decembra 2012 nacionalne zakonodaje, strožje od Uredbe (ES) št. 842/2006, v zvezi z dajanjem v promet izdelkov in opreme, ki vsebujejo F-pline ali katerih delovanje je od njih odvisno, dopustna.
meet needs on grounds of the protection of the environment,
ustrezajo potrebam glede varstva okolja;
take into account the existence and technical and economic availability of alternatives to the banned applications in Denmark, and are likely to result in limited economic impact,
upoštevajo obstoj ter tehnično in gospodarsko razpoložljivost nadomestnih snovi za prepovedane aplikacije na Danskem in bodo imele verjetno omejen gospodarski vpliv,
are not a means of arbitrary discrimination,
niso sredstvo samovoljne diskriminacije,
do not constitute a disguised restriction on trade between Member States, and
ne pomenijo prikritega omejevanja trgovine med državami članicami, in
are thus compatible with the Treaty
so torej združljive s Pogodbo.
The Commission therefore considers that they can be approved,
Komisija torej meni, da se lahko odobrijo –
The national provisions on certain fluorinated greenhouse gases, which the Kingdom of Denmark notified to the Commission by letter, dated 2 June 2006, and which are more stringent than Regulation (EC) No 842/2006 with respect to the placing on the market of products and equipment containing, or whose functioning relies upon, F-gases, are hereby approved.
Nacionalne določbe o nekaterih fluoriranih toplogrednih plinih, o katerih je Kraljevina Danska uradno obvestila Komisijo z dopisom z dne 2. junija 2006 in ki so strožje od Uredbe (ES) št. 842/2006 v zvezi z dajanjem v promet izdelkov in opreme, ki vsebujejo F-pline ali katerih delovanje je od odvisno, se odobrijo.
The Kingdom of Denmark is authorised to maintain them until 31 December 2012.
Kraljevini Danski se dovoli, da jih ohrani do 31. decembra 2012.
Done at Brussels, 8 December 2006.
V Bruslju, 8. decembra 2006.
OJ L 161, 16.4.2006, p. 1.
UL L 161, 16.4.2006, str. 1.
OJ C 228, 22.9.2006, p. 4.
UL C 228, 22.9.2006, str. 4.
See the Communication from the Commission concerning Article 95 (paragraphs 4, 5 and 6) of the Treaty establishing the European Community (COM(2002) 760 final, 23.12.2002), in particular paragraph 13.
Glej Sporočilo Komisije o členu 95 (odstavki 4, 5 in 6) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti (COM(2002) 760 konč., 23.12.2002), zlasti odstavek 13.
OJ L 244, 29.9.2000, p. 1
UL L 244, 29.9.2000, str. 1.
It should also be recalled that Article 9(3)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 842/2006 allows national measures to be maintained only until 31 December 2012. Therefore, and considering that the notification made by the Kingdom of Denmark referred to this Article of the Regulation, it follows that the Order would apply for a limited period.
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da člen 9(3)(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 842/2006 določa, da se nacionalni ukrepi ohranijo le do 31. decembra 2012; ker se uradno obvestilo, ki ga je predložila Kraljevina Danska, sklicuje na ta člen Uredbe, sledi, da bi Odredba veljala samo za omejeno obdobje.
of 19 May 2004
z dne 19. maja 2006
concerning the aid scheme that Italy plans to implement for poultry farms — AIMA programme for the poultry industry — C 59/2001 (ex N 97/1999)
o shemi za pomoč, ki jo ima Italija namen izvajati za perutninska podjetja – Program AIMA za perutninski sektor št. C 59/2001 (prej N 97/1999)
(notified under document number C(2004) 1802)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2004) 1802)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provision cited above,
po povabilu zainteresiranih strani k predložitvi ugotovitev v skladu z navedenim členom,
By letter dated 17 December 1999, registered as received on 22 December 1999, the Italian Permanent Representation to the European Union notified the Commission, in accordance with Article 88(3) of the Treaty, the above aid scheme relating to assistance from AIMA (Associazione italiana dei mercati agricoli — Italian Association for Agricultural Markets) to the Italian poultry market, which was said to have suffered a drastic fall in the consumption and sales of poultry as a result of the 1999 dioxin crisis.
S pismom z dne 17. decembra 1999 (vpisanim v evidenco 22. decembra 1999) je stalno predstavništvo Italije pri Evropski uniji v smislu člena 88(3) Pogodbe obvestilo Komisijo o zadevnem ukrepu v zvezi z ukrepi združenja AIMA (Agencija Republike Italije za kmetijstvo) za pomoč italijanskemu perutninskemu trgu, na katerem sta poraba in prodaja občutno upadli zaradi „dioksinske krize leta“ 1999.
By letters dated 8 August 2000, registered as received on 9 August 2000, 15 November 2000, registered on 21 November 2000, 27 February 2001, registered on 1 March 2001, and 23 May 2001, registered on 28 May 2001, the Italian Permanent Representation to the European Union sent the Commission the additional information sought from the Italian authorities by letters dated 18 February 2000 (ref. AGR 5073), 2 October 2000 (ref. AGR 25123), 10 January 2001 (ref. AGR 000449) and 24 April 2001 (ref. AGR 009825).
S pismi z dne 8. avgusta 2000 (vpisanim v evidenco 9. avgusta 2000), 15. novembra 2000 (vpisanim v evidenco 21. novembra 2000), 27. februarja 2001 (vpisanim v evidenco 1. marca 2001) in 23. maja 2001 (vpisanim v evidenco 28. maja 2001) je stalno predstavništvo Italije pri Evropski uniji sporočilo Komisiji dodatne podatke, ki jih je ta zahtevala s pismi z dne 18. februarja 2000 (ref. AGR 5073), 2. oktobra 2000 (ref. AGR 25123), 10. januarja 2001 (ref. AGR 000449) in 24 aprila 2001 (ref. AGR 009825).
By letter dated 30 July 2001, the Commission informed Italy of its decision to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 88(2) of the Treaty in respect of this aid.
S pismom z dne 30. julija 2001 je Komisija obvestila Italijo o sklepu, da sproži postopek iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe v zvezi z zadevno pomočjo.
The Commission Decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
Sklep Komisije o sprožitvi postopka je bil objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti.
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measure.
Komisija je povabila zainteresirane strani k predložitvi ugotovitev v zvezi z zadevnim ukrepom.
The Italian authorities submitted their comments by letter of 24 October 2001, registered as received on 26 October 2001.
Italijanski organi so svoje ugotovitve predstavili s pismom z dne 24. oktobra 2001 (vpisanim v evidenco 26. oktobra 2001).
The Commission received no comments from other interested parties.
Komisija ni prejela nobenih ugotovitev s strani drugih zainteresiranih strani.
National programme of AIMA assistance for 1999.
Nacionalni program ukrepov AIMA za leto 1999.
The legal basis for the proposed aid scheme is Article 3(1)(d) of Law No 610/82, which authorises AIMA, ‘using the financial resources at its disposal and based on the situation on the market and according to availability (…), to provide food products to developing countries, designated in agreement with the Ministry for Foreign Affairs and after consulting the national food institute’.
Pravna podlaga za načrtovani ukrep pomoči je člen 3(1)(d) Zakona št. 610/82, ki agenciji AIMA dovoljuje „uporabo sredstev, ki izvirajo iz lastnega finančnega upravljanja, v zvezi z delovanjem notranjega trga in razpoložljivostjo (...), da zagotovi kmetijske prehrambene proizvode deželam v razvoju, ki jih izbere po dogovoru z Ministrstvom za zunanje zadeve in na podlagi mnenja državnega inštituta za prehrano.“
Context
Ozadje:
The Italian Unione nazionale dell'avicoltura (UNA) (National Union of Poultry Farmers) had asked AIMA to intervene on the market in order to offset the serious impact of the dioxin crisis on the consumption of poultrymeat.
Nacionalna zveza za perutnino (UNA) je znotraj agencije AIMA (Agencija Republike Italije za kmetijstvo) spodbudila ukrepe na ravni trga za soočanje z resnimi posledicami dioksinske krize na področju porabe perutnine.
Initially (see letter dated 17 December 1999), following the refusal of AIMA to purchase 17000 tonnes of unsold meat, worth ITL 40 billion (approximately EUR 20 million), UNA had proposed selling some of the meat (11450 tonnes) at reduced prices on the markets of developing countries; the difference between the actual commercial value of the goods and the selling price (approximately ITL 20 billion i.e. 50 % of the market value) would have been covered by AIMA.
Takoj (prim. pismo z dne 17. decembra 1999) po zavrnitvi agencije AIMA, da bi odkupila 17000 ton neprodanega mesa – v vrednosti 40 milijard ITL (približno 20 milijonov EUR) – je UNA predlagala, da se del mesa (11450 ton) pošlje na trg držav v razvoju in tam proda po ugodnih cenah: razliko med dejansko tržno vrednostjo blaga in njegovo prodajno ceno (približno 20 milijard ITL ali 50 % zdajšnje tržne vrednosti) mora izplačati AIMA.
After the Commission had stated in its letter dated 18 February 2000 that the aid appeared to be an export refund covering the difference between the price of poultry in the third world and its price on the Italian market (and, therefore, by its very nature incompatible with the common market, with the Community’s obligations under the World Trade Organisation and with the common organisation of the market), the Italian authorities no longer referred, in their letter dated 10 August 2000, to the initial purpose of the aid, but argued that the losses suffered by Italian poultry farmers were the result of exceptional occurrences (rather than normal market risks) and were therefore eligible for the derogation provided for in Article 87(2)(b) of the Treaty.
Na podlagi ugotovitev služb Komisije (prim. pismo z dne 18. februarja 2000), ki so menile, da je pomoč oblikovana predvsem kot nadomestilo za izvoz za kritje razlike med ceno perutnine v državah v razvoju in ceno na italijanskem trgu (pomoč je tako po naravi nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom, obveznostmi Skupnosti znotraj Mednarodne trgovinske organizacije in skupno ureditvijo trgov), se italijanski organi v pismu z dne 10. avgusta 2000 niso več sklicevali na prvotni namen pomoči, ampak so navedli, da se lahko izguba, ki so jo utrpeli italijanski proizvajalci perutnine, obravnava kot posledica izrednih dogodkov (in ne kot posledica običajnega tveganja na trgu) ter se zato lahko uporabi odstopanje, določeno v členu 87(2)(b) Pogodbe.
Measure
Ukrep:
The programme provides for compensation for poultry farmers following the fall in prices and the collapse in sales caused by the dioxin crisis and the ensuing alarm among consumers.
Zadevni program predvideva nadomestilo za proizvajalce perutnine po znižanju cen in upadu prodaje zaradi dioksinske krize in preplaha, ki se je razširil med potrošniki.
The aid corresponds to the difference between average prices in countries not affected by the crisis and prices in Italy in June-July 1999 (the period considered for the purposes of compensation).
Višina pomoči ustreza razliki med povprečnimi cenami v državah, ki jih ni prizadela dioksinska kriza, in cenami v Italiji v obdobju med junijem in julijem 1999 (to obdobje se upošteva pri izplačilih nadomestil).
According to the Italian authorities, average prices in countries not affected by the crisis (excluding Italy) were EUR 137,89/100 kg in June and EUR 132,35/100 kg in July.
Povprečne cene v državah, ki jih kriza ni prizadela (brez Italije), so bile po mnenju italijanskih organov 137,89 EUR/100 kg v mesecu juniju in 132,35 EUR/100 kg v mesecu juliju.
The price difference was therefore EUR 53,966/100 kg in June and EUR 46,218/100 kg in July.
Razlika v cenah je tako 53,966 EUR/100 kg za mesec junij in 46,218 EUR/100 kg za mesec julij.
The maximum aid is ITL 21150/100 kg (EUR 10,92/100 kg) and ITL 15400/100 kg (EUR 7,95/100 kg).
Najvišja zneska pomoči sta 21150 ITL (10,92 EUR)/100 kg in 15400 ITL (7,95 EUR)/100 kg.
Aid is granted for meat produced and marketed in June and July 2001 and the total amount of aid is EUR 10329138.
Pomoč je odobrena za meso, proizvedeno in trženo v juniju in juliju 2001, največji skupni znesek pomoči pa je 10329138 EUR.
In support of their argument, the Italian authorities state that the dioxin crisis caused not only a collapse in production and trade (due to disturbances on the market following the outbreak of the crisis) but also a sharp fall in the consumption of poultry products.
Italijanski organi zagovarjajo te navedbe s poudarkom, da dioksinska kriza ni povzročila le upada proizvodnje in trženja (zaradi tržnih motenj po dogodku), ampak tudi velik padec porabe perutninskih proizvodov.
According to data provided by the Italian authorities, 34700000 kg of meat was sold at reduced prices in June 1999 (compared with 52000000 kg of meat sold in June 1998), followed by 30200000 kg in July 1999 (compared with 51000000 kg of meat sold in July 1998.
Na podlagi podatkov, ki so jih zagotovili italijanski organi, je bila prodaja mesa po znižani ceni: 34700000 kg mesa v juniju 1999 (proti 52000000 kg v juniju 1998) in 30200000 kg (proti 51000000 kg v juliju 1998 v juliju 1999.
In spite of the preventive measures taken by UNA to avoid a crisis of overproduction of poultrymeat (involving the slaughter, in March, of chicks that would have reached maturity in the next few months), the measures were unsuccessful because of the dioxin crisis.
Ne glede na to, da je UNA uvedla preventivne ukrepe za preprečitev krize zaradi prekomerne proizvodnje perutninskega mesa (vključno z zakolom piščancev v marcu, ki bi v naslednjih mesecih dorasli), je dioksinska kriza preprečila doseganje zadovoljivih rezultatov na tem področju.
In their letters dated 21 November 2000 and 28 May 2001, the Italian authorities stress the vital role played by the media during the crisis and claim that the alarm triggered by the media aggravated the sharp fall in the consumption of poultrymeat (29,1 % in June, 10,1 % in July, 16,2 % in August and 5,9 % for the year as a whole compared with a year earlier).
V pismih z dne 21. novembra 2000 in 28. maja 2001 so italijanski organi želeli poudariti temeljno vlogo, ki so jo imela sredstva obveščanja v mesecih krize: preplah, ki so ga povzročila, je povečal padec porabe perutninskega mesa (v mesecu juniju je bila poraba nižja za 29,1 % kot v prejšnjem letu, v mesecu juliju za 10,1 %, v mesecu avgustu 16,2 % in v celem letu za 5,9 %).
The collapse in demand caused a sharp reduction in prices, particularly in June and July (down 30 % and 30,1 % respectively compared with the same months of the previous year).
Upad povpraševanja je povzročil občutno znižanje cen, zlasti v juniju in juliju (–30 % in –30,1 % glede na ista meseca v prejšnjem letu).
In addition, in order to cope with this situation, Italian producers had to place 4150 tonnes of chicken in storage in June, 9271 tonnes in July and 2595 tonnes in August because they could not dispose of it on the market.
Razen tega so morali italijanski proizvajalci, da bi odpravili težave, v juniju uskladiščiti 4150 ton piščančjega mesa, 9271 ton v juliju in 2595 ton v avgustu, ker ga niso mogli dati na trg.
The scheme provides for no compensation for disposing of poultry or poultry products unfit for sale or consumption.
Pomoč ne predvideva nobene odškodnine za izločitev živali ali proizvodov živalskega izvora, ki niso primerni za porabo ali prodajo.
Amount of aid
Znesek pomoči:
The maximum aid planned is ITL 20 billion (EUR 10329138).
Predviden najvišji skupni znesek za pomoč je 20 milijard ITL (10329138 EUR).
Reasons for initiating the procedure
Začetek sprožitve postopka
The Commission initiated the procedure provided for in Article 88(2) of the Treaty because of its doubts as to the compatibility of the scheme with the common market.
Komisija je sprožila postopek iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe, ker je dvomila v združljivost sheme s skupnim trgom.
These doubts concerned whether or not the aid in question could be viewed as an aid to compensate for losses due to an exceptional occurrence.
Ta dvom je zadeval možnost enačenja zadevne pomoči s pomočjo, ki se izplačuje kot nadomestilo za izgube zaradi izrednega dogodka.
The Italian authorities referred to Article 87(2)(b) of the Treaty, under which aid to make good the losses caused by exceptional occurrences is compatible with the common market.
Italijanski organi so se dejansko sklicevali na člen 87(2)(b) Pogodbe, ki določa, da je pomoč, namenjena za odpravo škode, ki so jo povzročili izredni dogodki, združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The notification refers to the dioxin crisis as an exceptional occurrence.
To obvestilo obravnava dioksinsko krizo kot izredni dogodek.
The Treaty does not define the concept of exceptional occurrence and the Commission applies this provision on a case-by-case basis after making a detailed assessment of the event concerned.
V Pogodbi pojem izredni dogodek ni opredeljen. Komisija uporablja to določbo za vsak posamezen primer, potem ko zadevni primer natančno oceni.
In the case of the dioxin crisis affecting food and feedingstuffs produced in Belgium, the Commission had concluded that this was an exceptional occurrence within the meaning of Article 87(2)(b) of the Treaty because of the nature and extent of the restrictions that had to be imposed to protect public health in that Member State.
V primeru dioksinske krize je v zvezi z živilskimi proizvodi in živalsko krmo, proizvedenimi v Belgiji, Komisija ob upoštevanju narave in obsega omejitev, ki jih je bilo treba uvesti za zaščito javnega zdravja v tej državi, sklenila, da gre za izredni dogodek v skladu s členom 87(2)(b) Pogodbe.
There are also other precedents as regards the definition of exceptional occurrence, involving, in particular those relating to aid granted by the United Kingdom during the BSE crisis: the Commission had concluded that it was an exceptional occurrence, in view, in particular, of the ban on exporting beef and veal and the fall in the consumption of beef and veal due to the uncertainties and concern caused by the news about BSE.
V zvezi z opredelitvijo izrednega dogodka obstajajo še drugi precedensi zlasti v okviru različnih pomoči, odobrenih v Združenem kraljestvu v zvezi s krizo zaradi bolezni BSE: Komisija je sklenila, da je to izreden dogodek, zlasti ob upoštevanju prepovedi izvoza govejega mesa in upada porabe govejega mesa zaradi negotovosti in nemira, ki so ju povzročili podatki o BSE.
It must however be stressed that the examples quoted involve countries directly affected (the United Kingdom in the case of BSE and Belgium in that of dioxin) and not, as in this case, a country where the market was disturbed because of consumers’ concerns (about dioxin).
Vseeno je treba poudariti, da zgoraj navedeni primeri zadevajo države, ki so bile neposredno vpletene v pojav (BSE v Združenem kraljestvu in dioksin v Belgiji), in ne, kot v tem primeru, na državo, katere trg je bil prizadet zaradi zaskrbljenosti potrošnikov v zvezi z dioksinom.