natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
prevent the unauthorised reading, copying, modification or deletion of personal data during transfers of personal data or during transportation of data media (transport control);
preprečiti nepooblaščeno branje, prepisovanje, spreminjanje ali izbris osebnih podatkov med pošiljanjem osebnih podatkov ali med premeščanjem nosilcev podatkov (nadzor premeščanja);
ensure that installed systems may, in case of interruption, be restored (recovery);
zagotoviti, da se lahko nameščeni sistemi v primeru prekinitve ponovno vzpostavijo (obnova);
ensure that the functions of the system perform, that the appearance of faults in the functions is reported (reliability) and that stored data cannot be corrupted by means of a malfunctioning of the system (integrity).
zagotoviti, da funkcije sistema delujejo, da se pojavljanje napak v funkcijah sporoči (zanesljivost) in da shranjeni podatki ne morejo postati neuporabni zaradi okvare sistema (neoporečnost).
Member States shall provide that processors may be designated only if they guarantee that they observe the requisite technical and organisational measures under paragraph 1 and comply with the instructions under Article 21.
Države članice določijo, da je lahko za obdelovalca imenovana le oseba, ki zagotovi, da bo izvajala potrebne tehnične in organizacijske ukrepe iz odstavka 1 in upoštevala navodila iz člena 21.
The competent authority shall monitor the processor in those respects.
Pristojni organ nadzoruje obdelovalca v tem pogledu.
Personal data may be processed by a processor only on the basis of a legal act or a written contract.
Obdelovalec lahko osebne podatke obdeluje le na podlagi pravnega predpisa ali pisne pogodbe.
Prior consultation
Predhodno posvetovanje
Member States shall ensure that the competent national supervisory authorities are consulted prior to the processing of personal data which will form part of a new filing system to be created where:
Države članice pred obdelavo osebnih podatkov, ki bodo del nove zbirke podatkov ali novega postopka, zagotovijo posvetovanje s pristojnim nacionalnim nadzornim organom, če:
special categories of data referred to in Article 6 are to be processed; or
bodo obdelane posebne vrste podatkov iz člena 6 ali
the type of processing, in particular using new technologies, mechanism or procedures, holds otherwise specific risks for the fundamental rights and freedoms, and in particular the privacy, of the data subject.
vrsta obdelave, predvsem zaradi novih tehnologij, mehanizmov ali postopkov, drugače vključuje posebna tveganja za temeljne pravice in svoboščine ter zlasti za zasebnost posameznika, na katerega se osebni podatki nanašajo.
Member States shall adopt suitable measures to ensure the full implementation of the provisions of this Framework Decision and shall in particular lay down effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties to be imposed in case of infringements of the provisions adopted pursuant to this Framework Decision.
Države članice sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za zagotovitev popolne izvedbe določb tega okvirnega sklepa in predvsem določijo učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne kazni, ki se naložijo ob kršitvi določb, sprejetih v skladu s tem okvirnim sklepom.
Each Member State shall provide that one or more public authorities are responsible for advising and monitoring the application within its territory of the provisions adopted by the Member States pursuant to this Framework Decision.
Vsaka država članica na svojem ozemlju določi javni organ ali več javnih organov, odgovornih za svetovanje in spremljanje uporabe predpisov, ki so jih sprejele države članice na podlagi tega okvirnega sklepa.
These authorities shall act with complete independence in exercising the functions entrusted to them.
Ti organi pri izvajanju nalog, ki so jim zaupane, delujejo popolnoma neodvisno.
Each authority shall in particular be endowed with:
Vsakemu organu se podelijo predvsem:
investigative powers, such as powers of access to data forming the subject matter of processing operations and powers to collect all the information necessary for the performance of its supervisory duties;
preiskovalna pooblastila, kot so pooblastila za dostop do podatkov, ki sestavljajo vsebino postopkov obdelave, in pooblastila za zbiranje vseh informacij, ki so potrebne za izvajanje njegovih nadzornih nalog;
effective powers of intervention, such as, for example, that of delivering opinions before processing operations are carried out, and ensuring appropriate publication of such opinions, of ordering the blocking, erasure or destruction of data, of imposing a temporary or definitive ban on processing, of warning or admonishing the controller, or that of referring the matter to national parliaments or other political institutions;
učinkovita pooblastila za posredovanje, kot je na primer dajanje mnenj pred izvajanjem postopkov obdelave, in zagotavljanje ustrezne objave takšnih mnenj, odrejanje blokiranja, izbrisa ali uničenja podatkov, izrek začasne ali dokončne prepovedi obdelave, opozarjanje ali opominjanje upravljavca, ali predložitev zadeve nacionalnim parlamentom ali drugim političnim institucijam;
the power to engage in legal proceedings where the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Framework Decision have been infringed or to bring this infringement to the attention of the judicial authorities.
pooblastila za sodelovanje v sodnih postopkih, kadar so kršene nacionalne določbe, sprejete na podlagi tega okvirnega sklepa, ali za seznanitev pravosodnih organov s temi kršitvami.
Decisions by the supervisory authority which give rise to complaints may be appealed against through the courts.
Zoper odločitve nadzornega organa se je mogoče pritožiti na sodiščih.
Each supervisory authority shall hear claims lodged by any person concerning the protection of his rights and freedoms in regard to the processing of personal data.
Vsak nadzorni organ obravnava zahtevke, ki jih vloži katera koli oseba v zvezi z varstvom njenih pravic in svoboščin, povezanim z obdelavo osebnih podatkov.
The person concerned shall be informed of the outcome of the claim.
Zadevna oseba je obveščena o odločitvah glede zahtevka.
Member States shall provide that the members and staff of the supervisory authority are bound by the data protection provisions applicable to the competent authority in question and, even after their employment has ended, are to be subject to a duty of professional secrecy with regard to confidential information to which they have access.
Države članice določijo, da so člani in uslužbenci nadzornega organa prav tako zavezani k izpolnjevanju predpisov o varstvu podatkov, ki veljajo za zadevni pristojni organ, in da so tudi po končani zaposlitvi zavezani k dolžnosti poklicne molčečnosti glede zaupnih informacij, do katerih imajo dostop.
Relationship to agreements with third States
Razmerje do sporazumov s tretjimi državami
This Framework Decision is without prejudice to any obligations and commitments incumbent upon Member States or upon the Union by virtue of bilateral and/or multilateral agreements with third States existing at the time of adoption of this Framework Decision.
Ta okvirni sklep ne posega v nobeno obveznost in zavezo držav članic ali Unije iz dvostranskih in/ali večstranskih sporazumov s tretjimi državami, obstoječimi ob sprejetju tega okvirnega sklepa.
In the application of these agreements, the transfer to a third State of personal data obtained from another Member State, shall be carried out while respecting Article 13(1)(c) or (2), as appropriate.
Pri uporabi teh sporazumov se osebni podatki, ki jih je posredovala druga država članica, posredujejo tretji državi ob upoštevanju, po potrebi, člena 14(1)(c) ali (2).
Member States shall report to the Commission by 27 November 2013 on the national measures they have taken to ensure full compliance with this Framework Decision, and particularly with regard to those provisions that already have to be complied with when data is collected.
Države članice poročajo Komisiji o nacionalnih ukrepih, ki so jih sprejele za zagotovitev skladnosti s tem okvirnim sklepom, zlasti v zvezi s tistimi določbami, ki morajo biti usklajene že pri zbiranju podatkov do 27. novembra 2013.
The Commission shall examine in particular the implications of those provisions for the scope of this Framework Decision as laid down in Article 1(2).
Komisija pregleda zlasti vplive določb o področju uporabe tega okvirnega sklepa, kakor določa člen 1(2).
The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council within one year on the outcome of the evaluation referred to in paragraph 1, and shall accompany its report with any appropriate proposals for amendments to this Framework Decision.
V roku enega leta Komisija poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o izidu vrednotenja iz odstavka 1 in svojemu poročilu priloži morebitne ustrezne predloge za spremembo tega okvirnega sklepa.
Relationship to previously adopted acts of the Union
Razmerje do predhodno sprejetih aktov Unije
Where in acts, adopted under Title VI of the Treaty on European Union prior to the date of entry into force of this Framework Decision and regulating the exchange of personal data between Member States or the access of designated authorities of Member States to information systems established pursuant to the Treaty establishing the European Community, specific conditions have been introduced as to the use of such data by the receiving Member State, these conditions shall take precedence over the provisions of this Framework Decision on the use of data received from or made available by another Member State.
Če so bili v aktih, sprejetih v skladu z naslovom VI Pogodbe o Evropski uniji pred dnem začetka veljavnosti tega okvirnega sklepa, ki urejajo izmenjavo osebnih podatkov med državami članicami oziroma dostop določenih organov držav članic do informacijskih sistemov, vzpostavljenih na podlagi Pogodbe o ustanoviti Evropske skupnosti, uvedeni posebni pogoji, pod katerimi lahko država članica prejemnica uporabljate podatke, imajo ti pogoji prednost pred določbami tega okvirnega sklepa o uporabi podatkov, ki jih je sprejela ali do njih omogočila dostop druga država članica.
Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with the provisions of this Framework Decision before 27 November 2010.
Države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, potrebne za uskladitev z določbami tega okvirnega sklepa pred 27. novembrom 2010.
By the same date Member States shall transmit to the General Secretariat of the Council and to the Commission the text of the provisions transposing into their national law the obligations imposed on them under this Framework Decision, as well as information on the supervisory authorities referred to in Article 25.
Do tega datuma države članice pošljejo Generalnemu sekretariatu Sveta in Komisiji besedilo določb, ki prenašajo v nacionalno zakonodajo obveznosti, ki jim jih nalaga ta okvirni sklep, ter obveznosti o določitvi nadzornih organov, navedenih v členu 25.
On the basis of a report established using this information by the Commission, the Council shall, before 27 November 2011, assess the extent to which Member States have complied with the provisions of this Framework Decision.
Na podlagi poročila Komisije, ki je oblikovan z uporabo teh informacij, Svet pred 27. novembrom 2011 preveri, v kakšnem obsegu so države članice usklajene z določbami tega okvirnega sklepa.
This Framework Decision shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta okvirni sklep začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
OJ C 125 E, 22.5.2008, p. 154.
UL C 125 E, 22.5.2008, str. 154.
OJ L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 1.
UL L 210, 6.8.2008, str. 1.
Council Framework Decision 2008/978/JHA
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2008/978/PNZ
on the European evidence warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters
o evropskem dokaznem nalogu za namene pridobitve predmetov, dokumentov in podatkov za uporabo v kazenskih postopkih
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31 and Article 34(2)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti člena 31 in člena 34(2)(b) Pogodbe,
According to the Conclusions of the Tampere European Council of 15 and 16 October 1999, and in particular point 33 thereof, the principle of mutual recognition should become the cornerstone of judicial cooperation in both civil and criminal matters within the Union.
V skladu s sklepi zasedanja Evropskega sveta v Tampereju z dne 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 ter še zlasti s točko 33 teh sklepov bi moralo načelo vzajemnega priznavanja predstavljati temeljni kamen pravosodnega sodelovanja, tako v civilnih kot tudi v kazenskih zadevah znotraj Unije.
On 29 November 2000 the Council, in accordance with the Tampere Conclusions, adopted a programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition in criminal matters [2].
Svet je 29. novembra 2000 v skladu s sklepi iz Tampereja sprejel program ukrepov za izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja na področju kazenskih zadev [2].
This Framework Decision is necessary to complete measures 5 and 6 of that programme, which deal with the mutual recognition of orders to obtain evidence.
Ta okvirni sklep je nujen, da se lahko izvedeta ukrepa 5 in 6 navedenega programa, ki se nanašata na vzajemno priznavanje sklepov o pridobitvi dokazov.
Point 3.3.1 of the Hague Programme [3], included in the Conclusions of the European Council of 4 and 5 November 2004, emphasises the importance of the completion of the comprehensive programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition in criminal matters and highlights the introduction of the European evidence warrant (EEW) as a matter of priority.
Točka 3.3.1 Haaškega programa [3], vključena v sklepe Evropskega sveta z dne 4. in 5. novembra 2004, poudarja pomembnost zaključitve celovitega programa ukrepov za izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja v kazenskih zadevah ter poudarja, da je uvedba evropskega dokaznega naloga (EDN) prednostna zadeva.
Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States [4] was the first concrete measure in the field of criminal law implementing the principle of mutual recognition.
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2002/584/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami [4] je bil prvi konkretni ukrep izvajanja načela vzajemnega priznavanja na področju kazenskega prava.
Council Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA of 22 July 2003 on the execution in the European Union of orders freezing property and evidence [5] addresses the need for immediate mutual recognition of orders to prevent the destruction, transformation, moving, transfer or disposal of evidence.
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2003/577/PNZ z dne 22. julija 2003 o izvrševanju sklepov o zasegu premoženja ali dokazov v Evropski uniji [5] izpostavlja potrebo po takojšnem vzajemnem priznavanju sklepov, da se prepreči uničenje, preoblikovanje, premikanje, prenos ali odstranitev dokazov.
However, this deals only with part of the spectrum of judicial cooperation in criminal matters with respect to evidence, and subsequent transfer of the evidence is left to mutual assistance procedures.
Vendar to le delno zajema pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah v zvezi z dokazi, kasnejši prenosi dokazov pa so prepuščeni postopkom medsebojne pomoči.
It is therefore necessary further to improve judicial cooperation by applying the principle of mutual recognition to a judicial decision, in the form of an EEW, for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters.
Zato je treba pravosodno sodelovanje še okrepiti z uporabo načela vzajemnega priznavanja sodnih odločb v obliki EDN za namen pridobitve predmetov, dokumentov in podatkov za uporabo v kazenskih postopkih.
The EEW may be used to obtain any objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters for which it may be issued.
EDN se lahko uporablja za pridobitev kakršnih koli predmetov, dokumentov in podatkov za uporabo v kazenskih postopkih, za katere se lahko izda EDN.
This may include for example objects, documents or data from a third party, from a search of premises including the private premises of the suspect, historical data on the use of any services including financial transactions, historical records of statements, interviews and hearings, and other records, including the results of special investigative techniques.
To lahko na primer zajema tudi predmete, dokumente ali podatke, pridobljene s strani tretjih oseb, iz preiskav prostorov, vključno z zasebnimi prostori osumljenca, pretekle podatke o uporabi kakršnih koli storitev, vključno s finančnimi transakcijami, pretekle zapise izjav, pogovorov in zaslišanj ter druge zapise, vključno z izsledki, pridobljenimi s posebnimi preiskovalnimi tehnikami.
The principle of mutual recognition is based on a high level of confidence between Member States.
Načelo vzajemnega priznavanja temelji na visoki stopnji zaupanja med državami članicami.
In order to promote this confidence, this Framework Decision should contain important safeguards to protect fundamental rights.
Da bi to zaupanje še spodbudili, bi moral ta okvirni sklep vsebovati pomembne zaščitne ukrepe, ki bodo ščitili temeljne pravice.
The EEW should therefore be issued only by judges, courts, investigating magistrates, public prosecutors and certain other judicial authorities as defined by Member States in accordance with this Framework Decision.
Zato bi morali biti za odreditev EDN pristojni le sodniki, sodišča, preiskovalni sodniki, javni tožilci in nekateri drugi pravosodni organi, kakor jih v skladu s tem okvirnim sklepom opredelijo države članice.
This Framework Decision is adopted under Article 31 of the Treaty and therefore concerns judicial cooperation within the context of that provision, aiming to assist the collection of evidence for proceedings as defined in Article 5 of this Framework Decision.
Ta okvirni sklep se sprejema na podlagi člena 31 Pogodbe in se nanaša na pravosodno sodelovanje v okviru navedene določbe, njegov namen pa je pripomoči k zbiranju dokazov za postopke, iz člena 5 tega okvirnega sklepa.
Although authorities other than judges, courts, investigating magistrates and public prosecutors may have a role in the collection of such evidence in accordance with Article 2(c)(ii), this Framework Decision does not cover police, customs, border and administrative cooperation which are regulated by other provisions of the Treaties.
Čeprav imajo organi, ki niso sodniki, sodišča, preiskovalni sodniki in javni tožilci, lahko določeno vlogo pri zbiranju teh dokazov v skladu s členom 2(c)(ii), pa ta okvirni sklep ne zajema policijskega, carinskega, mejnega in upravnega sodelovanja, ki ga urejajo druge določbe Pogodb.
The definition of the term ‘search or seizure’ should not be invoked for the application of any other instrument applicable between Member States, in particular the Council of Europe Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters of 20 April 1959, and the instruments which supplement it.
Opredelitev izraza „preiskava ali zaseg“ se ne bi smela uporabljati pri uporabi drugih instrumentov, ki se uporabljajo med državami članicami, zlasti Konvencije Sveta Evrope o medsebojni pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah z dne 20. aprila 1959 in instrumentov, ki jo dopolnjujejo.
An EEW should be issued only where obtaining the objects, documents or data sought is necessary and proportionate for the purpose of the criminal or other proceedings concerned.
EDN bi se moral izdati samo, če je pridobitev zahtevanih predmetov, dokumentov ali podatkov nujna in sorazmerna za namene zadevnega kazenskega ali drugega postopka.
In addition, an EEW should be issued only where the object, documents or data concerned could be obtained under the national law of the issuing State in a comparable case.
Poleg tega bi se moral EDN izdati samo, če bi bilo mogoče v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo države izdajateljice pridobiti predmete, dokumente ali podatke v primerljivem primeru.
The responsibility for ensuring compliance with these conditions should lie with the issuing authority.
Za upoštevanje teh pogojev bi moral biti odgovoren organ izdajatelj.
The grounds for non-recognition or non-execution should therefore not cover these matters.
Razlogi za nepriznanje ali neizvršitev zato ne bi smeli zajemati teh zadev.
The executing authority should use the least intrusive means to obtain the objects, documents or data sought.
Za pridobitev zahtevanih predmetov, dokumentov ali podatkov bi moral izvršitveni organ uporabiti kar najmanj vsiljiva sredstva.
The executing authority should be obliged to execute the EEW for electronic data not located in the executing State only to the extent possible under its law.
Izvršitveni organ bi moral biti obvezan, da v zvezi s podatki v elektronski obliki, ki se ne nahajajo v državi izvršiteljici, EDN izvrši le v obsegu, kot ga dovoljuje zakonodaja države izvršiteljice.
It should be possible, if the national law of the issuing State so provides in transposing Article 12, for the issuing authority to ask the executing authority to follow specified formalities and procedures in respect of legal or administrative processes which might assist in making the evidence sought admissible in the issuing State, for example the official stamping of a document, the presence of a representative from the issuing State, or the recording of times and dates to create a chain of evidence.
Odreditveni organ bi moral imeti možnost – če je v nacionalni zakonodaji države izdajateljice za prenos člena 12 tako določeno – od izvršitvenega organa zahtevati, da le-ta upošteva določene formalnosti in postopke pri pravnih ali upravnih postopkih, ki lahko pripomorejo k sprejemljivosti zahtevanega dokaza v državi izdajateljici, npr. uradno žigosanje dokumenta, prisotnost predstavnika države izdajateljice ali beleženje časa in datumov zaradi vzpostavitve verige dokazov.
Such formalities and procedures should not encompass coercive measures.
Te formalnosti in postopki ne bi smeli vključevati prisilnih ukrepov.
The execution of an EEW should, to the widest extent possible, and without prejudice to fundamental guarantees under national law, be carried out in accordance with the formalities and procedures expressly indicated by the issuing State.
Izvršitev EDN bi morala v največjem možnem obsegu potekati v skladu s formalnostmi in postopki, ki jih izrecno navede država izdajateljica, pri tem pa izvršitev ne bi smela posegati v temeljna jamstva nacionalnega prava.
To ensure the effectiveness of judicial cooperation in criminal matters, the possibility of refusing to recognise or execute the EEW, as well as the grounds for postponing its execution, should be limited.
Da se zagotovi učinkovitost pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, bi bilo treba omejiti možnost zavrnitve priznanja ali izvršitve EDN ter razloge za odlog izvršitve.
In particular, refusal to execute the EEW on the grounds that the act on which it is based does not constitute an offence under the national law of the executing State (dual criminality) should not be possible for certain categories of offences.
Zlasti ni dopustna zavrnitev izvršitve EDN za določene kategorije kaznivih dejanj iz razloga, da dejanje, za katero je bil nalog izdan, po nacionalni zakonodaji države izvršiteljice ne predstavlja kaznivega dejanja (dvojna kaznivost).
It should be possible to refuse an EEW where its recognition or execution in the executing State would involve breaching an immunity or privilege in that State.
EDN bi moralo biti mogoče zavrniti, v kolikor bi priznanje ali izvršitev le-tega v državi izvršiteljici pomenila kršitev imunitete ali privilegija v tej državi.