natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 318/2007 [3] lays down the animal health conditions for imports of certain birds other than poultry into the Community and the quarantine conditions applicable to such birds after import.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 318/2007 [3] določa pogoje zdravstvenega varstva živali pri uvozu nekaterih ptic, razen perutnine, v Skupnost in pogojih za karanteno, ki se uporablja za take ptice po uvozu.
It is appropriate to explicitly state that only imports of captive bred birds is authorised under Regulation (EC) No 318/2007.
Primerno je izrecno navesti, da je na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 318/2007 odobren le uvoz v ujetništvu gojenih ptic.
For the sake of clarity, it should also be explicitly stated that birds may only be imported into the Community under Regulation (EC) No 318/2007 if they come from approved breeding establishments.
Zaradi jasnosti je treba tudi izrecno navesti, da se lahko ptice uvozijo v Skupnost na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 318/2007 le, če prihajajo iz odobrenih obratov za vzrejo.
After imports, the imported birds are to be transported directly to an approved quarantine facility or centre in a Member State, where they must remain until infection with avian influenza or Newcastle disease virus is ruled out.
Po uvozu je treba uvožene ptice prepeljati neposredno do odobrenega karantenskega obrata ali centra v državi članici, v katerem morajo ostati, dokler se ne izključi okužba z aviarno influenco ali atipično kokošjo kugo.
Regulation (EC) No 318/2007 provides that in case avian influenza or Newcastle disease is suspected in an approved quarantine facility or in a unit of an approved quarantine centre, all birds in the quarantine facility or unit of a quarantine centre are to be killed and destroyed before the suspicion is confirmed by laboratory testing.
Uredba (ES) št. 318/2007 določa, da je treba v primeru suma za aviarno influenco ali atipično kokošjo kugo v odobrenem karantenskem obratu ali enoti odobrenega karantenskega centra vse ptice v karantenskem obratu ali enoti karantenskega centra ubiti in uničiti, preden se sum potrdi z laboratorijskim testiranjem.
However, because these birds suspected to be infected by avian influenza or Newcastle disease are kept in an approved quarantine facility or in a unit of an approved quarantine centre, there is no risk of the disease spreading further.
Vendar ker so te ptice, za katere obstaja sum okužbe z aviarno influenco ali atipično kokošjo kugo, v odobrenem karantenskem obratu ali enoti odobrenega karantenskega centra, ni nevarnosti nadaljnjega razširjanja bolezni.
Therefore, it is appropriate to wait until the suspicion is confirmed to rule out any other cause of disease symptoms before commencing to kill and destroy the birds in the affected premises.
Zato je primerno, da se počaka do potrditve suma za izključitev kakršnih koli drugih vzrokov za znake bolezni, preden se začne z ubijanjem in uničenjem ptic v prizadetih prostorih.
Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 318/2007 sets out a list of quarantine facilities and centres approved by the competent authorities of the Member States for import of certain birds other than poultry.
Priloga V k Uredbi (ES) št. 318/2007 določa seznam karantenskih obratov in centrov, ki so jih pristojni organi držav članic odobrili za uvoz nekaterih ptic, razen perutnine.
Austria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom have reviewed their approved quarantine facilities and centres and have sent an updated list of those quarantine facilities and centres to the Commission.
Avstrija, Češka, Danska, Nemčija, Španija in Združeno kraljestvo so pregledale svoje odobrene karantenske obrate in centre in so Komisiji poslale posodobljen seznam navedenih karantenskih obratov in centrov.
The list of approved quarantine facilities and centres set out in Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 318/2007 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Seznam odobrenih karantenskih obratov in centrov iz Priloge V k Uredbi (ES) št. 318/2007 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Regulation (EC) No 318/2007 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 318/2007 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Regulation (EC) No 318/2007 is amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 318/2007 se spremeni:
in Article 4, the introductory phrase is replaced by the following:
V členu 4 se uvodno besedilo nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Approved breeding establishments shall comply with the following conditions:’;
„Odobreni obrati za vzrejo izpolnjujejo naslednje pogoje:“.
‘Imports of birds shall be authorised only if the birds comply with the following conditions:’
„Uvoz ptic se odobri le, če ptice izpolnjujejo naslednje pogoje:“;
the following point is inserted after point (b):
za točko (b) se vstavi naslednja točka:
the birds come from approved breeding establishments that comply with the conditions laid down in Article 4;’
ptice prihajajo iz odobrenih obratov za vzrejo, ki so v skladu s pogoji iz člena 4;“.
the competent authority shall place the approved quarantine facility under official supervision;
pristojni organ postavi odobreni karantenski obrat pod uradni nadzor;
samples for virological examination as set out in point 2 of Annex VI shall be taken from those birds and sentinel birds and shall be analysed accordingly;
navedenim pticam in kontrolnim pticam se odvzamejo vzorci za virološko preiskavo, kakor je opredeljeno v točki 2 Priloge VI, in se ustrezno analizirajo;
no birds shall enter or leave the approved quarantine facility until the suspicion is ruled out.
nobena ptica ne vstopi v odobreni karantenski obrat ali ga zapusti, dokler se sum ne izključi.
If the suspicion of avian influenza or Newcastle disease in the affected approved quarantine facility as referred to in paragraph 1 is confirmed, the following measures shall be taken:
Če se potrdi sum za aviarno influenco ali atipično kokošjo kugo v prizadetem odobrenem karantenskem obratu, kot je navedeno v odstavku 1, se izvedejo naslednji ukrepi:
all birds and sentinel birds in the approved quarantine facility shall be killed and destroyed;
vse ptice in kontrolne ptice v odobrenem karantenskem obratu se ubijejo in uničijo;
the approved quarantine facility shall be cleaned and disinfected;
odobreni karantenski obrat se očisti in razkuži;
no birds shall enter the approved quarantine facility until 21 days following the final cleaning and disinfection.
dokler ne mine 21 dni od zaključnega čiščenja in razkuženja, se v odobreni karantenski obrat ne namestijo nobene ptice.
If during quarantine in an approved quarantine centre, it is suspected that one or more birds and/or sentinel birds in a unit of the quarantine centre are infected with avian influenza or Newcastle disease, the following measures shall be taken:
Če obstaja med karanteno v odobrenem karantenskem centru sum, da je ena ali več ptic in/ali kontrolnih ptic v enoti karantenskega centra okuženih z aviarno influenco ali atipično kokošjo kugo, se izvedejo naslednji ukrepi:
the competent authority shall place the approved quarantine centre under official supervision;
pristojni organ postavi odobreni karantenski center pod uradni nadzor;
no birds shall enter or leave the approved quarantine centre until the suspicion is ruled out.
nobena ptica ne vstopi v odobreni karantenski center ali ga zapusti, dokler se sum ne izključi.
If the suspicion of avian influenza or Newcastle disease in the affected unit of the approved quarantine centre as referred to in paragraph 3 is confirmed, the following measures shall be taken:
Če se potrdi sum za aviarno influenco ali atipično kokošjo kugo v prizadeti enoti odobrenega karantenskega centra, kot je navedeno v odstavku 3, se izvedejo naslednji ukrepi:
all birds and sentinel birds in the affected unit of the approved quarantine centre shall be killed and destroyed;
vse ptice in kontrolne ptice v prizadeti enoti odobrenega karantenskega centra se ubijejo in uničijo;
the unit concerned shall be cleaned and disinfected;
zadevna enota se očisti in razkuži;
the following samples shall be taken:
vzamejo se naslednji vzorci:
where sentinel birds are used, not earlier than 21 days following the final cleaning and disinfection of the unit concerned, samples for serological examination, as set out in Annex VI must be taken from sentinel birds in the other quarantine units; or
če se uporabljajo kontrolne ptice, se ne prej kakor 21 dni po zaključnem čiščenju in razkuženju zadevne enote kontrolnim pticam v preostalih karantenskih enotah odvzamejo vzorci za serološko preiskavo, kot je določeno v Prilogi VI; ali
no birds shall leave the approved quarantine centre until the results of the sampling provided for in point (c) have been confirmed as negative.
dokler rezultati vzorčenja iz točke (c) niso potrjeni kot negativni, nobena ptica ne zapusti odobrenega karantenskega centra.
Member States shall inform the Commission of any measures taken under this Article.’;
Države članice obvestijo Komisijo o kakršnih koli ukrepih, sprejetih po tem členu.“
in Article 14(1), the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:
V členu 14(1) se prvi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
Where during quarantine one or more birds and/or sentinel birds are found to be infected with low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) or Newcastle disease, the competent authority may, based on a risk assessment, grant derogations from the measures provided for in Article 13(2)(a) and (4)(a), provided that such derogations do not endanger disease control (the derogation).’;
Če se med karanteno ugotovi, da je ena ali več ptic okuženih z nizko patogeno aviarno influenco ali atipično kokošjo kugo, lahko pristojni organ na podlagi ocene tveganja dovoli odstopanja od ukrepov iz člena 13(2)(a) in člena (4)(a), pod pogojem, da taka odstopanja ne ogrožajo nadzora bolezni (odstopanje).“
Annex V is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga V se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
List of approved facilities and centres as referred to in Article 6(1)
Seznam odobrenih obratov in centrov, kot je navedeno v členu 6(1)
Council Regulation (EC) No 1279/2007
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1279/2007
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on certain iron or steel ropes and cables originating in the Russian Federation, and repealing the anti-dumping measures on imports of certain iron or steel ropes and cables originating in Thailand and Turkey
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na nekatere železne ali jeklene vrvi in kable s poreklom iz Rusije ter o razveljavitvi protidampinških ukrepov na uvoz nekaterih železnih ali jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom iz Tajske in Turčije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Articles 11(2) and 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“) in zlasti člena 11(2) in 11(3) Uredbe,
Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the advisory committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga, ki ga je predložila Komisija po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom,
On 2 February 2001, the Council imposed, by Regulation (EC) No 230/2001 [2] (the provisional Regulation) provisional anti-dumping measures on imports of certain iron or steel ropes and cables (SWR) originating in the Czech Republic, Russia, Thailand and Turkey (the three last countries will be referred to as the countries concerned).
Svet je 2. februarja 2001 z Uredbo (ES) št. 230/2001 [2] („začasna uredba“) uvedel začasne protidampinške ukrepe na uvoz nekaterih železnih ali jeklenih vrvi in kablov („SWR“) s poreklom iz Češke, Rusije, Tajske in Turčije (zadnje tri navedene države so v nadaljnjem besedilu „zadevne države“).
On 2 August 2001, the Council imposed, by Regulation (EC) No 1601/2001 [3] (the original Regulation), definitive anti-dumping measures.
Svet je 2. avgusta 2001 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1601/2001 [3] („prvotna uredba“) uvedel dokončne protidampinške ukrepe na uvoz SWR.
The measures imposed on imports of SWR originating in the Czech Republic lapsed after the enlargement of the European Union on 1 May 2004.
Ukrepi, uvedeni na uvoz SWR s poreklom iz Češke, so prenehali veljati po širitvi Evropske unije 1. maja 2004.
On 26 July 2001, the Commission accepted, by Decision 2001/602/EC [4], undertakings offered by one Russian and one Thai exporter in connection with the anti-dumping measures referred to in recital 1.
Komisija je 26. julija 2001 s Sklepom 2001/602/ES [4] sprejela zaveze, ki sta jih v zvezi s protidampinškimi ukrepi, navedenimi v uvodni izjavi 1, ponudila en ruski in en tajski izvoznik.
On 8 November 2005, the Council imposed, by Regulation (EC) No 1858/2005 [5] definitive anti-dumping measures on imports of certain steel ropes and cables originating in the People's Republic of China, India, South Africa and Ukraine (the parallel proceeding).
Svet je 8. novembra 2005 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1858/2005 [5] uvedel dokončne protidampinške ukrepe na uvoz nekaterih jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, Indije, Južne Afrike in Ukrajine („vzporedni postopek“).
Request for reviews
Zahtevki za pregled
Partial Interim reviews of the anti-dumping measures in force against exporting producers in Russia
Delna vmesna pregleda veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za proizvajalce izvoznike v Rusiji
In 2004, the Commission received two requests for partial interim reviews pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation (interim reviews).
Komisija je leta 2004 prejela zahtevka za delna vmesna pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe („vmesna pregleda“).
The requests, limited in scope to dumping, were lodged by Open Joint Stock Company Cherepovetsky Staleprokatny Zavod (ChSPZ) and Joint Stock Company Beloretsk Iron & Steel Works (BMK) respectively, both exporting producers of SWR in Russia.
Zahtevka, omejena na damping, sta vložila Open Joint Stock Company Cherepovetsky Staleprokatny Zavod („ChSPZ“) oziroma Joint Stock Company Beloretsk Iron & Steel Works („BMK“), oba proizvajalca izvoznika SWR v Rusiji.
As explained in a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [6], ChSPZ's name was changed to Closed Joint Stock Company Severstal-Metiz (SSM) as a result of a merger with Open Joint Stock Company Orlovsky Staleprokatny Zavod (OSPAZ) and Closed Joint Stock Company Severstal-Metiz.
Kot je pojasnjeno v obvestilu, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [6], je ChSPZ zaradi združitve z Open Joint Stock Company Orlovsky Staleprokatny Zavod („OSPAZ“) in Closed Joint Stock Company Severstal-Metiz spremenila naziv v Closed Joint Stock Company Severstal-Metiz („SSM“).
This name change applied as of 1 January 2006.
Sprememba naziva se uporablja od 1. januarja 2006.
According to the applicants, the circumstances on the basis of which measures had been established had changed and these changes were of a lasting nature.
Vložnika trdita, da so se okoliščine, na podlagi katerih so bili ukrepi uvedeni, trajno spremenile.
Moreover, both exporting producers alleged that the existing levels of anti-dumping measures were no longer necessary to offset dumping.
Poleg tega sta oba proizvajalca izvoznika trdila, da za preprečevanje dampinga obstoječe stopnje protidampinških ukrepov niso bile več potrebne.
Having determined, after consulting the advisory committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of two interim reviews, the Commission initiated these reviews on 10 August 2004 [7].
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek dveh delnih vmesnih pregledov, je Komisija 10. avgusta 2004 [7] začela s pregledom.
Partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures in force against one exporting producer in Turkey
Delni vmesni pregled veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za enega proizvajalca izvoznika v Turčiji
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry [8], the Commission received a request on 28 April 2006 for an interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation (received jointly with a request for a review pursuant to Article 11(2) (expiry review) referred to in recitals 12 to 15 below).
Po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku [8] je Komisija 28. aprila 2006 prejela zahtevek za vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe (prejetim skupaj z zahtevkom za pregled v skladu s členom 11(2) („pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa“), navedenim v uvodnih izjavah 12 do 15).
The request was lodged by the Liaison Committee of EU Wire Ropes Industries (EWRIS or the applicant), on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50 %, of the total Community production of certain iron and steel ropes and cables.
Zahtevek je vložil Povezovalni odbor industrije žičnatih vrvi Evropske unije („EWRIS“ ali „vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 50 %, celotne proizvodnje nekaterih železnih in jeklenih vrvi ter kablov v Skupnosti.
The scope of the interim review requested by the applicant was limited to the level of dumping by one single exporting producer in Turkey (which at present has a zero duty).
Vmesni pregled, ki ga je zahteval vložnik, je bil omejen na stopnjo dampinga enega proizvajalca izvoznika v Turčiji (trenutno ima stopnjo dajatve nič).
According to the applicant, the level of the measures is no longer sufficient to counteract the injurious dumping.
Vložnik trdi, da stopnja ukrepov ne zadostuje več za odpravo škodljivih učinkov dampinga.
Having determined, after consulting the advisory committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an interim review, the Commission initiated this review on 3 August 2006 [9].
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek vmesnega pregleda, je Komisija 3. avgusta 2006 [9] začela s pregledom.
Expiry review of the anti-dumping measures in force against Russia, Thailand and Turkey
Pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za Rusijo, Tajsko in Turčijo
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry, the Commission received a request on 28 April 2006 for an expiry review (received jointly with the request for an interim review referred to in recitals 8 to 11 above).
Po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku je Komisija 28. aprila 2006 prejela zahtevek za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa (prejet skupaj z zahtevkom za vmesni pregled, navedenim v uvodnih izjavah 8 do 11).
The request for the expiry review related to all countries currently covered by the original Regulation, and was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury to the Community industry.
Zahtevek za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa v zvezi z vsemi državami, trenutno zajetimi v prvotni uredbi, temelji na izhodišču, da bi iztek veljavnosti ukrepov verjetno povzročil nadaljevanje ali ponovitev dampinga in škode industriji Skupnosti.
Having determined, after consulting the advisory committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of the expiry review, the Commission initiated this review on 3 August 2006.
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa, je Komisija 3. avgusta 2006 začela s pregledom.
Partial Interim review of the anti-dumping measures in force against one exporting producer in Thailand
Delni vmesni pregled veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za enega proizvajalca izvoznika na Tajskem
The Commission received a request for a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je prejela zahtevo za delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
The request, limited in scope to dumping, was lodged by Usha Siam Steel Industries Public Company Ltd, an exporting producer of SWR in Thailand.
Zahtevek, omejen na damping, je vložil Usha Siam Steel Industries Public Company Ltd., proizvajalec izvoznik SWR na Tajskem.
According to the applicant, the circumstances on the basis of which measures had been established had changed and these changes were of lasting nature.
Vložnik trdi, da so se okoliščine, na podlagi katerih so bili ukrepi uvedeni, trajno spremenile.
Moreover, the exporting producer alleged that the existing level of anti-dumping measures was no longer necessary to offset dumping.
Poleg tega proizvajalec izvoznik trdi, da za preprečevanje dampinga obstoječa stopnja protidampinških ukrepov ni bila več potrebna.
Having determined, after consulting the advisory committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of the interim review, the Commission initiated this review on 22 March 2007 [10].
Ko je Komisija po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom sklenila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek vmesnega pregleda, je 22. marca 2007 [10] začela s pregledom.
Parties concerned by the investigations
Stranke, ki jih preiskave zadevajo
The Commission officially advised the exporting producers, the representatives of the exporting countries, importers, Community producers, users and the applicant of the initiation of the expiry review and the partial interim reviews.
Komisija je proizvajalce izvoznike, predstavnike držav izvoznic, uvoznike, proizvajalce Skupnosti, uporabnike in vložnika uradno obvestila o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa delnih vmesnih pregledov.
In view of the apparent large number of Community producers, it was considered appropriate to examine whether sampling should be used in the expiry review in conformity with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na zelo veliko število proizvajalcev Skupnosti je bilo primerno, da se v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe prouči, ali je treba pri pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa uporabiti vzorčenje.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Community producers were requested, pursuant to Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, to make themselves known within 15 days of the initiation of the relevant reviews and to provide the Commission with the information requested in the notice of initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in če je, da bi lahko izbrala vzorec, je uvoznike Skupnosti pozvala, da se v skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe v 15 dneh od začetka ustreznih pregledov javijo Komisiji in ji predložijo podatke, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku.
After examination of the information submitted by 17 Community producers, it was considered that five companies should be selected for a sample on the basis, in particular, of the volume of their production and sales during the IP.
Po preučitvi informacij, ki jih je predložilo 17 proizvajalcev Skupnosti, se je štelo, da je treba za vzorec izbrati pet družb, predvsem na podlagi obsega njihove proizvodnje in prodaje med OP.
The sample consists of the following companies:
V vzorec so bile vključene naslednje družbe:
Bridon GmbH, Gelsenkirchen, Germany,
Bridon GmbH, Gelsenkirchen, Nemčija
Casar Drahtseilwerk Saar GmbH (Casar), Saarbrücken, Germany,
Casar Drahtseilwerk Saar GmbH („Casar“), Saarbrücken, Nemčija
Wire and Rope Factory Drumet SA (Drumet), Wloclawek, Poland,
Wire and Rope Factory Drumet S.A. („Drumet“), Wloclawek, Poljska
Manuel Rodrigues de Oliveria SA & Filhos SA (Oliveira), Gemunde, Portugal,
Manuel Rodrigues de Oliveria SA & Filhos S.A. („Oliveira“), Gemunde, Portugalska
Tréfileurope SA, Bourg-en-Bresse, France.
Tréfileurope S.A., Bourg-en-Bresse, Francija.
Sampling of Community importers
Vzorčenje uvoznikov Skupnosti
In view of the apparent large number of Community importers (32 importers listed in the application), it was considered appropriate to examine whether sampling should be used in the expiry review in conformity with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na zelo veliko število uvoznikov Skupnosti (32 uvoznikov je bilo naštetih v zahtevku) je bilo primerno, da se v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe prouči, ali je treba v pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa uporabiti vzorčenje.