natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The investigation showed that MET could not be granted to three of the abovementioned five Chinese exporting producers that had requested MET as none of these companies or groups of companies met criterion 2 as summarised in recital 24.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se TGO trem od navedenih petih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki so zahtevali TGO, ne more zagotoviti, ker nobena od teh družb ali skupine družb ne izpolnjuje merila št. 2 iz uvodne izjave 24.
In addition, one of the groups of companies did not fulfil criterion 3 either.
Razen tega ena od skupin družb tudi ni izpolnila merila št. 3.
Two companies or groups of companies (FIAC and Nu Air) fulfilled all the criteria as summarised in recital 24 and could be granted MET.
Dve družbi ali skupini družb (FIAC in Nu Air) sta izpolnili vsa merila iz uvodne izjave 24 in se jima TGO odobri.
One company (Taizhou) part of the group of companies (Hongyou/Taizhou) and one company (Wealth Shanghai/Nantong Wealth) could not demonstrate that they fulfilled criterion 2 as summarised in recital 24 since they were not found to have accounting practices and accounting standards that were in line with international accounting standards.
Družba (Taizhou), ki je del skupine družb (Hongyou/Taizhou), in druga družba (Wealth Shanghai/Nantong Wealth) nista dokazali, da sta izpolnili merilo št. 2 iz uvodne izjave 24, ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da nimata računovodskih praks in standardov, ki so usklajeni z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi.
The group of companies (Hongyou/Taizhou) and the company (Wealth Shanghai/Nantong Wealth) could therefore not be granted MET.
Skupini družb (Hongyou/Taizhou) in družbi (Wealth Shanghai/Nantong Wealth) se zato TGO ne odobri.
One company (Xinlei) could not demonstrate that it fulfilled criterion 2 as summarised in recital 24 since its accounting practices and accounting standards were not in line with international accounting standards.
Družba (Xinlei) ni dokazala, da je izpolnila merilo št. 2 iz uvodne izjave 24, ker njene računovodske prakse in standardi niso usklajeni z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi.
Moreover, the company could not fully demonstrate payment for its land use rights.
Poleg tega družba ni v celoti dokazala plačila za pravice do rabe zemljišča.
It did therefore not meet criterion 3 as summarised in recital 24 either.
Zato tudi ni izpolnila merila št. 3 iz navedene uvodne izjave 24.
Accordingly, it could not therefore be granted MET.
Zato se ji v skladu s tem TGO ne odobri.
One unrelated importer objected to the granting of MET to Nu Air, on the basis of some alleged inconsistencies in the audited accounts for 2004 and 2005.
En nepovezani uvoznik je nasprotoval odobritvi TGO za družbo Nu Air, na podlagi nekaterih domnevnih neskladnosti v revidiranih računovodskih izkazih za leti 2004 in 2005.
Nu Air, however, could show that there were no inconsistencies and clarify the points raised by that importer.
Vendar je družba Nu Air lahko dokazala, da ni bilo nobenih neskladnosti, in pojasnila zastavljena vprašanja tega uvoznika.
Accordingly, this objection was dismissed.
Ta ugovor je bil v skladu s tem zavrnjen.
The same importer objected to the granting of MET to FIAC, in view of the fact that the company had negotiated in 2002 a preliminary agreement with the regional authorities, which would have given them the use of a plot of land without charge for a maximum of three years, pending the lands expropriation formalities.
Isti uvoznik je nasprotoval odobritvi TGO za družbo FIAC, ker se je družba leta 2002 pogajala o predhodnem dogovoru z regionalnimi organi, ki bi ji odobrili brezplačno uporabo kosa zemljišča za največ tri leta do uradne razlastitve zemljišča.
However, the agreement expired without FIAC ever making any use of it or acquiring a title for this land.
Vendar je dogovor potekel brez tega, da bi družba FIAC kadar koli uporabila zemljišče ali do njega pridobila pravico.
On the other hand, FIAC was able to demonstrate that it always paid rental for the premises used in its activities.
Na drugi strani je družba FIAC lahko dokazala, da je vedno plačala najemnino za uporabo prostorov za svoje dejavnosti.
This argument was therefore dismissed.
Argument je bil zato zavrnjen.
One company (Hongyou) of the group of companies (Hongyou/Taizhou) objected that it should not be refused MET due to issues arising in another company (namely, Taizhou).
Ena družba (Hongyou) iz skupine družb (Hongyou/Taizhou) je nasprotovala zavrnitvi TGO zaradi vprašanj, ki so se pojavila v drugi družbi (in sicer v družbi Taizhou).
However, on the basis of the Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs code [3], Hongyou and Taizhou are to be considered as related parties.
Vendar se na podlagi Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 z dne 2. julija 1993 o določbah za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [3] družbi Hongyou in Taizhou štejeta kot povezani stranki.
Therefore, as Taizhou could not be granted MET, Hongyou could not be granted MET neither.
Zato ker se TGO ne odobri družbi Taizhou, se ne odobri niti družbi Hongyou.
On the basis of the above, three of the five Chinese sampled companies or groups of companies that had requested MET could not show that they fulfil all the criteria set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi navedenega tri od petih kitajskih vzorčenih družb ali skupin družb, ki so zahtevale TGO, niso mogle dokazati, da so izpolnile vsa merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
It was therefore considered that MET should be granted to two companies (FIAC and Nu Air) and rejected for the remaining three companies/groups of companies.
Zato je bilo ugotovljeno, da se TGO odobri le dvema družbama (FIAC in Nu Air), medtem ko se preostale tri družbe/skupine družb zavrnejo.
The Advisory Committee was consulted and did not object to the conclusions of the Commissions services.
Opravljeno je bilo posvetovanje s Svetovalnim odborom in ta ugotovitvam Komisije ni nasprotoval.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, a country wide duty, if any, is established for countries falling under that Article, except in those cases where companies are able to demonstrate that they meet all criteria set out in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe se za države, ki jih zajema navedeni člen, uvede dajatev na ravni države, če je to potrebno, razen v primerih, ko lahko družbe dokažejo, da izpolnjujejo vsa merila iz člena 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
All exporting producers who requested MET also claimed IT in the event that they would not be granted MET.
Vsi proizvajalci izvozniki, ki so zahtevali TGO, so zahtevali tudi IO, če jim TGO ne bi bil odobren.
One company (Anlu) had only requested IT.
Ena družba (Anlu) je zahtevala le IO.
Of the four sampled companies or groups of companies that could either not be granted MET (Xinlei, Honyou/Taizhou, Wealth Shanghai/Nantong Wealth) or had not requested MET (Anlu), three companies or groups (Xinlei, Anlu and Wealth Shanghai/Nantong Wealth) fulfilled all the criteria set out in Article 9(5) and could be granted IT.
Od štirih vzorčenih družb ali skupin družb, ki jim ni bilo mogoče odobriti TGO (Xinlei, Honyou/Taizhou, Wealth Shanghai/Nantong Wealth) ali niso zahtevale TGO (Anlu), so tri družbe ali skupine (Xinlei, Anlu in Wealth Shanghai/Nantong Wealth) izpolnile vsa merila iz člena 9(5) in se jim lahko odobri IO.
It was found that Taizhou failed to demonstrate that it cumulatively met all the requirements for IT as set forth in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Ugotovili so, da družba Taizhou ni dokazala, da je kumulativno izpolnila vse zahteve za IO iz člena 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
Namely, the severe problems with the accounting system of the company made it impossible to verify whether the criterion stipulated in Article 9(5)(b) of the basic Regulation that export prices and quantities, and conditions and terms of sale are freely determined, was fulfilled.
Resne težave z računovodskim sistemom družbe so namreč onemogočile preverjanje, ali je bilo merilo iz člena 9(5)(b) osnovne uredbe, da so izvozne cene in količine ter pogoji prodaje prosto oblikovani, izpolnjeno.
The IT claim of Taizhou was thus rejected.
Zato je bila zahteva za IO družbe Taizhou zavrnjena.
Companies or groups of companies which could be granted MET
Družbe ali skupine družb, ki se jim lahko odobri TGO
As far as the determination of normal value is concerned, the Commission first established, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, for those exporting producers in the sample that could be granted MET whether their domestic sales of the product concerned to independent customers were representative, i.e. whether the total volume of such sales represented at least 5 % of their total export sales volume of the product concerned to the Community.
Kar zadeva določitev normalne vrednosti, je Komisija v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe za proizvajalce izvoznike iz vzorca, ki se jim lahko odobri TGO, najprej ugotovila, ali je bila njihova domača prodaja zadevnega izdelka neodvisnim strankam reprezentativna, tj., ali je celoten obseg take prodaje predstavljal vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost.
Since the two companies or groups of companies had almost non-existent sales on the domestic market, it was considered that the product was not sold in representative quantities so as to provide an appropriate basis for the establishment of the normal value.
Ker dve družbi ali skupini družb skoraj nista imeli prodaje na domačem trgu, je bilo obravnavano, da izdelek ni bil prodan v reprezentativnih količinah in tako ni zagotovil primerne osnove za določitev normalne vrednosti.
Since domestic sales could not be used in order to establish normal value, another method had to be applied.
Ker domače prodaje ni bilo mogoče uporabiti za določitev normalne vrednosti, je bilo treba uporabiti drugo metodo.
In this regard, the Commission used a constructed normal value, in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je Komisija v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe uporabila konstruirano normalno vrednost.
Normal value was constructed on the basis of the companies or groups of companies manufacturing costs of the product concerned.
Normalna vrednost je bila konstruirana na podlagi proizvodnih stroškov zadevnega izdelka družb ali skupine družb.
When constructing normal value pursuant to Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses and profit is added to the manufacturing costs.
Pri konstruiranju normalne vrednosti v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe se proizvodnim stroškom prištejejo razumni zneski za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške („stroški PSA“) in za dobiček.
The SG&A expenses and profit could not be established on the basis of the chapeau of Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation since none of the companies or groups of companies had representative domestic sales.
Stroškov PSA in dobička ni bilo mogoče določiti na podlagi uvodnega stavka člena 2(6) osnovne uredbe, ker nobena družba ali skupina družb ni imela reprezentativne domače prodaje.
They could not be established on the basis of Article 2(6)(a) because there was no other company to which MET could be granted.
Teh stroškov ni bilo mogoče določiti na podlagi člena 2(6)(a), ker ni bilo nobene druge družbe, ki se ji lahko odobri TGO.
Moreover, SG&A expenses and profits could not be established on the basis of Article 2(6)(b) as none of the companies or groups of companies had representative sales, in the ordinary course of trade, of the same general category of products.
Razen tega stroškov PSA in dobička ni bilo mogoče določiti na podlagi člena 2(6)(b), ker nobena družba ali skupina družb ni imela reprezentativne prodaje v običajnem poteku trgovine za isto splošno kategorijo izdelkov.
SG&A expenses and profits were therefore determined in accordance with Article 2(6)(c) (any other reasonable method) on the basis of the SG&A expenses and profits incurred by the cooperating producer in the analogue country.
Zato so bili stroški PSA in dobiček določeni v skladu s členom 2(6)(c) („katere koli druge razumne metode“) na podlagi stroškov PSA in dobička, ki jih je ustvaril sodelujoči proizvajalec iz primerljive države.
Publicly available information showed that this profit margin did not exceed the profit made by other known producers of the same general category of products (i.e. electrical machinery) in the PRC during the IP.
Javno dostopne informacije so pokazale, da ta stopnja dobička ni presegla dobička, ki so ga v obdobju preiskave ustvarili znani proizvajalci iste splošne kategorije izdelkov (tj. električnih strojev) v LRK.
Companies or groups of companies which could not be granted MET
Družbe ali skupine družb, ki jim ni mogoče odobriti TGO
In the notice of initiation, the Commission indicated that it envisaged using Brazil as an appropriate analogue country for the purpose of establishing normal value for the PRC.
V obvestilu o začetku je Komisija izrazila svoj namen, da kot ustrezno primerljivo državo za določitev normalne vrednosti za LRK predvideva uporabo Brazilije.
There are four known producers in Brazil, making about 220000 compressors per year, and imports are about 30000 units.
V Braziliji so štirje znani proizvajalci, ki proizvedejo približno 220000 kompresorjev na leto in izvozijo približno 30000 enot.
The Commission sought cooperation from all known producers in Brazil.
Komisija si je pri vseh znanih proizvajalcih v Braziliji prizadevala za sodelovanje.
Two Brazilian producers cooperated in the investigation.
V preiskavi sta sodelovala dva brazilska proizvajalca.
One of them is related to a Community producer, the FIAC Group.
Eden od njiju je povezan s proizvajalcem Skupnosti, s skupino FIAC.
The investigation showed that this producer had generally high prices, mainly due the fact that he produced a small volume of sophisticated compressors for medical purposes which were not directly comparable to the product concerned.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je imel ta proizvajalec na splošno visoke cene, večinoma zaradi tega, ker je proizvajal majhne količine visoko razvitih kompresorjev za medicinske namene, ki niso bili neposredno primerljivi z zadevnim izdelkom.
Due to the very different characteristics of the product and the market, it would be difficult to establish the necessary adjustments in order to use this data as normal value for the Chinese-produced compressors.
Zaradi zelo različnih lastnosti izdelka in trga bi bilo težko določiti potrebne prilagoditve, da se ti podatki uporabijo kot normalna vrednost za kompresorje kitajskih proizvajalcev.
The second cooperating Brazilian producer was found to produce some compressor models comparable to the ones exported to the Community by the Chinese exporting producers.
Drugi sodelujoči brazilski proizvajalec je proizvajal nekaj modelov kompresorjev, ki so primerljivi s tistimi, ki jih v Skupnost izvažajo kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki.
Therefore, the prices in the Brazilian market of the comparable models of this Brazilian producer sold in the ordinary course of trade were used as a basis for establishing normal value for the exporting producers not granted MET.
Zato so se na brazilskem trgu cene primerljivih modelov tega brazilskega proizvajalca, ki se prodajajo v običajnem poteku trgovanja, uporabile kot podlaga za določitev normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim TGO ni bil odobren.
The exporting producers made export sales to the Community either directly to independent customers or through related or unrelated trading companies located inside and outside the Community.
Proizvajalci izvozniki so izdelke v Skupnost izvažali neposredno neodvisnim strankam ali prek povezanih ali nepovezanih trgovinskih družb s sedežem v Skupnosti in zunaj nje.
Companies or groups of companies which could be granted either MET or IT
Družbe ali skupine družb, ki se jim lahko odobri TGO ali IO
Where export sales to the Community were made either directly to independent customers in the Community or through unrelated trading companies, export prices were established on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable for the product concerned in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Kadar so se izdelki v Skupnost izvažali neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti ali prek nepovezanih trgovinskih družb, so bile izvozne cene določene na podlagi dejansko plačanih cen ali cen, ki se plačujejo za zadevne izdelke, v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
Where export sales to the Community were made through related trading companies located in the Community, export prices were established on the basis of the first resale prices of these related traders to independent customers in the Community, pursuant to Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Kadar so se izdelki v Skupnost izvažali prek povezanih trgovinskih družb s sedežem v Skupnosti, so bile izvozne cene določene na podlagi cen teh povezanih trgovcev pri nadaljnji prodaji prvemu neodvisnemu kupcu v Skupnosti, v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
For the sales channelled through related companies outside the Community, the export price was established on the basis of the first resale prices to independent customers in the Community.
Kadar je prodaja potekala prek povezanih družb zunaj Skupnosti, je bila izvozna cena določena na podlagi cen pri nadaljnji prodaji prvemu neodvisnemu kupcu v Skupnosti.
Companies or groups of companies which could not be granted MET/IT
Družbe ali skupine družb, ki jim ni mogoče odobriti TGO/IO
For the two sampled Chinese exporting companies that were granted neither MET nor IT (Taizhou/Honyou Group), the data on their export sales could not be used to establish individual dumping margins for the reasons explained above in recital 29.
Za dve vzorčeni kitajski izvozni družbi, ki jima ni bil odobren ne TGO ne IO (Taizhou/Honyou Group), se podatki o njunem izvozu zaradi navedenih razlogov iz uvodne izjave 29 ne morejo uporabiti za določitev posameznih stopenj dampinga.
Therefore, a dumping margin was calculated as set out in recital 55.
Zato se je stopnja dampinga izračunala tako, kot določa uvodna izjava 55.
The normal value and export prices were compared on an ex-works basis and at the same level of trade.
Normalna vrednost in izvozne cene so se primerjale na podlagi cene izdelka franko tovarna in na isti ravni trgovine.
On this basis, for those Chinese exporting producers that could be granted MET/IT, allowances for differences in level of trade, transport and insurance costs, handling, loading and ancillary costs, packing costs, credit costs and after sales costs (warranty/guarantee) were made where applicable and justified.
Na podlagi tega so bili za vse kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike, ki se jim lahko odobri TGO/IO, izvedeni popravki za vse razlike v stopnji trgovinskih, prevoznih, zavarovalnih in manipulativnih stroškov, stroškov natovarjanja in s tem povezanih stroškov, pakiranja, kreditov in poprodajnih stroškov (jamstvo/zavarovanje), kadar je bilo to ustrezno in upravičeno.
For the other companies, an average adjustment based on the adjustments mentioned before was made.
Za druge družbe je bila izvedena povprečna prilagoditev na podlagi prej navedenih prilagoditev.
For the sales channelled through related traders based outside the Community, an adjustment was applied in accordance with Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation, where these companies have been shown to perform functions similar to that of an agent working on a commission basis.
Za prodajo prek povezanih trgovcev zunaj Skupnosti je bila uporabljena prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) osnovne uredbe, če so te družbe opravljale svojo dejavnost podobno kot zastopnik, ki dela na podlagi provizije.
This adjustment was based on the SG&A of the trading companies plus a profit data obtained an unrelated trader in the Community.
Ta prilagoditev je temeljila na stroških PSA trgovskih družb in podatkih o dobičku od nepovezanih trgovcev v Skupnosti.
Dumping margins
Dampinške stopnje
The dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the cif import price at the Community border, duty unpaid, are the following:
Stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek uvozne cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, so:
Zhejiang Hongyou Air Compressor Manufacturing Co., Ltd, Wenling and Taizhou Hutou Air Compressors Manufacturing Co. Ltd, Wenling
Zhejiang Hongyou Air Compressor Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Wenling in Taizhou Hutou Air Compressors Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Wenling
Nu Air (Shanghai) Compressor and Tools Co., Ltd, Shanghai
Nu Air (Shanghai) Compressor and Tools Co. Ltd., Šanghaj
Cooperating companies not included in the sample (listed in Annex)
Sodelujoče družbe, ki niso bile zajete v vzorcu (navedene v Prilogi)
For the two sampled companies which were granted neither MET nor IT, the dumping margin was calculated as a weighted average of the margins established for the three companies or groups of companies granted IT but not MET.
Za dve vzorčeni družbi, ki jima ni bil odobren ne TGO ne IO, se je izračunala stopnja dampinga kot tehtano povprečje stopenj, določenih za tri družbe ali skupine družb, ki se jim je odobril IO, vendar ne TGO.
For the cooperating companies not included in the sample, the dumping margin was calculated as a weighted average of the margins established for all the companies in the sample.
Za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec, se je stopnja dampinga izračunala kot tehtano povprečje stopenj, določenih za vse družbe v vzorcu.
Given the high level of cooperation (100 %), referred to at recital 22, a country-wide average dumping margin was set at the highest level applicable to any of the sampled companies.
Glede na visoko stopnjo sodelovanja (100 %), navedeno v uvodni izjavi 22, se je povprečna stopnja dampinga za državo določila na najvišji ravnik, ki se uporablja za vzorčene družbe.
In the light of the definition of Community industry as set out in Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation, the output of the following Community manufacturers was considered for inclusion in the definition of the Community production at the initiation of the investigation:
V skladu z opredelitvijo industrije Skupnosti, določene v členu 4(1) osnovne uredbe, je bila ob začetku preiskave vključena v opredelitev proizvodnje Skupnosti tudi proizvodnja naslednjih proizvajalcev Skupnosti:
four complainant Community manufacturers: CHINOOK SpA, FERRUA SYSTEM BLOCK Srl, FIAC SpA and FINI SpA,
štirih pritožnikov proizvajalcev Skupnosti: CHINOOK SpA, FERRUA SYSTEM BLOCK Srl, FIAC SpA in FINI SpA,
one other producer in the Community who fully cooperated in the investigation and who supported the proceeding: ABAC Aria Compressa SpA of the ABAC Group.
še enega proizvajalca Skupnosti, ki je v celoti sodeloval v preiskavi in podprl postopek: ABAC Aria Compressa SpA iz skupine ABAC Group.
It is noted that the ABAC Group sold this company to another company in 2007,
Znano je, da je skupina ABAC Group leta 2007 to družbo prodala drugi družbi,
six other Community producers listed in the complaint.
šestih drugih proizvajalcev Skupnosti, naštetih v pritožbi.
Those companies received a sampling questionnaire, but only one of them expressed the wish to further cooperate with the proceeding within the time limits indicated in the notice of initiation.
Te družbe so prejele vprašalnik za vzorčenje, vendar je le ena od njih izrazila željo po nadaljnjem sodelovanju v postopku v rokih, ki so določeni v obvestilu o začetku.
However, this producer stopped cooperating shortly thereafter and did not provide a full questionnaire reply,
Vendar je ta proizvajalec kmalu potem prekinil sodelovanje in ni vrnil izpolnjenega vprašalnika,
20 other manufacturers listed in the complaint, which assemble the like product using parts produced by the abovementioned Community producers and/or imported from third countries.
dvajsetih drugih proizvajalcev, naštetih v pritožbi, ki sestavljajo podobni izdelek iz delov, ki jih proizvedejo navedeni proizvajalci Skupnosti in/ali ki so uvoženi iz tretjih držav.