natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Community importers were requested, pursuant to Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, to make themselves known within 15 days of the initiation of the relevant reviews and to provide the Commission with the information requested in the notice of initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in če je, da bi lahko izbrala vzorec, je uvoznike Skupnosti pozvala, da se v skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe v 15 dneh od začetka ustreznih pregledov javijo Komisiji in ji predložijo podatke, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku.
However, since only a single importer made itself known by replying to the sample questionnaire, it was decided that sampling was not warranted in this case.
Ker je vzorčni vprašalnik izpolnil samo en uvoznik, je bilo sklenjeno, da v tem primeru vzorčenje ni potrebno.
Questionnaires and verification
Vprašalniki in preveritveni pregledi
Questionnaires were therefore sent to all known exporting producers in the countries concerned, the single importer referred to in recital 23 above, the Community producers in the sample and users.
Vprašalniki so bili zato poslani vsem znanim proizvajalcem izvoznikom v zadevnih državah, edinemu izvozniku iz uvodne izjave 23, proizvajalcem Skupnosti v vzorcu ter uporabnikom.
Replies to the questionnaires were received from:
Izpolnjene vprašalnike so predložili
two exporting producers in Russia for the purposes of the interim review and one for the purposes of the expiry review,
2 proizvajalca izvoznika iz Ruske federacije za vmesni pregled in en za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa,
one exporting producer in Thailand and its related importer in the United Kingdom,
1 proizvajalec izvoznik na Tajskem in njegov povezan uvoznik v Združenem kraljestvu,
two exporting producers in Turkey,
2 proizvajalca izvoznika v Turčiji,
one importer related to the exporting producers in the countries concerned,
1 uvoznik, povezan s proizvajalci izvozniki v zadevnih državah,
five Community producers included in the sample,
5 proizvajalcev Skupnosti, vključenih v vzorec,
one unrelated importer.
1 nepovezan uvoznik.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for its analysis and carried out verification visits at the premises of the following companies:
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za njeno analizo, ter opravila preveritvene obiske v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Russia:
Rusija
Thailand:
Tajska
Turkey:
Turčija
Has Çelik ve Halat Sanayi Ticaret A.S.(Has Celik), Hacilar Kayseri;
Has Çelik ve Halat Sanayi Ticaret A.S. („Has Celik“), Hacilar Kayseri
Sampled Community producers:
vzorčeni proizvajalci Skupnosti
Wire and Rope Factory Drumet SA, Wloclawek, Poland,
Wire and Rope Factory Drumet S.A., Wloclawek, Poljska
Manuel Rodrigues de Oliveria SA & Filhos SA, Gemunde, Portugal,
Manuel Rodrigues de Oliveria SA & Filhos S.A., Gemunde, Portugalska
Tréfileurope SA, Bourg-en-Bresse, France;
Tréfileurope S.A., Bourg-en-Bresse, Francija
Usha Martin UK Ltd, Clydebank, United Kingdom;
Usha Martin UK Ltd., Clydebank, Združeno kraljestvo
Unrelated importers in the Community:
nepovezani uvoznik v Skupnosti
HEKO Industrieerzeugnisse GmbH, Hemer, Germany.
HEKO Industrieerzeugnisse GmbH, Hemer, Nemčija.
Relevant periods covered by the review investigations
Ustrezna obdobja, zajeta v preiskavah v zvezi s pregledom
The investigation of the likelihood of continuation and/or recurrence of dumping and injury for the expiry review covered the period from 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006 (expiry review investigation period or ERIP).
Preiskava glede verjetnosti nadaljevanja ter/ali ponovitve dampinga in škode v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa je zajela obdobje od 1. julija 2005 do 30. junija 2006 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa“ ali „OPPIU“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2003 up to the end of the ERIP (period considered).
Proučevanje trendov, ki so pomembni za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajemalo obdobje od 1. januarja 2003 do konca OPPIU („obravnavano obdobje“).
The investigation period for the partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation concerning imports from two exporting producers in Russia covered the period from 1 July 2003 to 30 June 2004 (Russia-interim review period).
Obdobje preiskave, uporabljeno za delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe glede uvoza od dveh proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Rusiji, je zajelo obdobje od 1. julija 2003 do 30. junija 2004 („obdobje vmesnega pregleda – Rusija“).
The relevant investigation period for the partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation concerning imports from the exporting producer in Turkey (Turkey-interim review period) is the same as the ERIP.
Ustrezno obdobje, uporabljeno za delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe glede uvoza od enega proizvajalca izvoznika v Turčiji („obdobje vmesnega pregleda – Turčija“), je enako kot OPPIU.
The investigation period for the partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation concerning imports from the exporting producer in Thailand covered the period from 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2007 (Thailand-interim review period).
Obdobje preiskave, uporabljeno za delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe glede uvoza od enega proizvajalca izvoznika na Tajskem, je zajelo obdobje od 1. aprila 2006 do 31. marca 2007 („obdobje vmesnega pregleda – Tajska“).
Disclosure and opportunity to comment
Razkritje in možnost predložitve pripomb
All interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on certain iron or steel ropes and cables originating in Russia and terminating the investigations concerning the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of certain iron or steel ropes and cables originating in Thailand and Turkey.
Vse zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti uvedba dokončne protidampinške dajatve na nekatere železne ali jeklene vrvi in kable s poreklom iz Rusije ter zaključku preiskav v zvezi s protidampinškimi ukrepi, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz nekaterih železnih ali jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom iz Tajske in Turčije.
The product concerned by this expiry review is the same as the product defined in the original Regulation, i.e. ropes and cables, including locked coil ropes, of iron or steel but not stainless steel, with a maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeding 3 mm, with attached fittings or not, originating in the countries concerned (the product concerned).
Izdelek, ki ga ta pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa zadeva, je isti kot izdelek, določen v prvotni uredbi, tj. vrvi in kabli, vključno z zaprtimi svitki vrvi iz železa ali jekla, vendar ne nerjavnega jekla, maksimalnega prereza več kot 3 mm, s pritrjenimi dodatki ali ne, s poreklom iz zadevnih držav („zadevni izdelek“).
SWR are currently classifiable within CN codes ex73121081, ex73121083, ex73121085, ex73121089 and ex73121098.
SWR je trenutno uvrščen pod oznake KN ex73121081, ex73121083, ex73121085, ex73121089 in ex73121098.
One interested party argued that the product concerned should be divided into two different groups namely (a) general purpose SWR and (b) high performance SWR.
Ena zainteresirana stranka je trdila, da je treba zadevni izdelek razdeliti na dve različni skupini in sicer (a) SWR za splošne namene ter (b) SWR za posebne namene.
It also argued that the latter, which allegedly were not produced in the exporting countries, should be excluded from the proceedings because, according to some importers, the SWR types under that category were different from the SWR in the other category and there was no competition amongst these SWR.
Poleg tega je trdila, da je treba slednje, ki jih države izvoznice domnevno niso proizvajale, izvzeti iz postopkov, ker so bile, skladno s trditvami nekaterih uvoznikov, vrste SWR iz te kategorije drugačne od SWR iz druge kategorije, zato si niso bile konkurenčne.
First, the interested party did not bring any elements which would demonstrate that the product imported from the countries concerned is not like the one produced by the Community industry or that the SWR in question were not in competition with each other or were not interchangeable.
Prvič, zainteresirana stranka ni predložila nobenih elementov, ki bi kazali, da izdelek, uvožen iz zadevnih držav, ni enak izdelku, ki ga proizvaja industrija Skupnosti, ali da si zadevni SWR niso bili konkurenčni ali zamenljivi.
Therefore, the claim had to be rejected.
Trditev je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
Furthermore, the party was not able to show that the definition and the description of the product concerned, as defined in recitals 10 to 13 of the provisional Regulation, were erroneous.
Poleg tega stranka ni mogla dokazati, da sta bila opredelitev in opis zadevnega izdelka, kot sta navedena v uvodnih izjavah 10 do 13 začasne uredbe, napačna.
The definition of the product concerned in the original Regulation is therefore confirmed.
Zato se potrdi opredelitev zadevnega izdelka v prvotni uredbi.
In recitals 14 to 19 of the original Regulation, it was concluded that the product concerned, the SWR produced and sold by Community producers and the SWR sold on the domestic markets and exported to the Community from the countries concerned shared the same basic physical and chemical characteristics.
V uvodnih izjavah 14 do 19 osnovne uredbe je bilo sklenjeno, da ima zadevni izdelek, SWR, ki ga proizvajajo in prodajajo proizvajalci Skupnosti, in SWR, ki ga na domačem trgu prodajajo in izvažajo v Skupnost iz zadevnih držav, enake osnovne fizikalne in kemijske lastnosti.
These products were considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Ti izdelki so se šteli za podobne v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
One interested party argued that the imported SWR differ substantially from the ones manufactured and sold in the Community and could not be compared for the purpose of the current investigations.
Ena zainteresirana stranka je trdila, da so se uvoženi SWR bistveno razlikovali od tistih, ki so bili proizvedeni in prodajani v Skupnosti, in jih v sedanjih preiskavah ni mogoče primerjati.
It argued that the products imported into the Community were not in direct competition with the SWR manufactured in the Community.
Trdila je, da izdelki, uvoženi v Skupnost, niso neposredno konkurirali v Skupnosti proizvedenim SWR.
The same arguments had been put forward in the investigation leading up to the conclusions reached in recital 15 of the provisional Regulation.
Enake utemeljitve so bile dane tudi v preiskavi, ki je privedla do sklepnih ugotovitev v uvodni izjavi 15 začasne uredbe.
As the interested party did not bring any new elements which would demonstrate that the product imported from the countries concerned is not alike the one manufactured and sold in the Community, the claim had to be rejected.
Ker zainteresirana stranka ni predložila nobenih novih elementov, ki bi kazali, da izdelek, uvožen iz zadevnih držav, ni enak tistemu, ki je proizveden in prodajan v Skupnosti, je bilo trditev treba zavrniti.
The conclusions reached in recitals 14 to 19 of the original Regulation concerning the like product can therefore be confirmed.
Zato se lahko potrdi sklepne ugotovitve v zvezi s podobnim izdelkom iz uvodnih izjav 14 do 19 prvotne uredbe.
DUMPING AND LIKELIHOOD OF A CONTINUATION AND/OR RECURRENCE OF DUMPING
DAMPING IN VERJETNOST NADALJEVANJA IN/ALI PONOVITVE DAMPINGA
Dumping of imports during the Review investigation periods — General principles
Damping uvoza med obdobji preiskave v zvezi s pregledom – splošna načela
For reasons of consistency it has been, as a first step, examined whether dumping was currently taking place and whether or not the expiry of the measures would be likely to lead to a continuation of dumping.
Zaradi skladnosti je bilo najprej proučeno, ali damping trenutno obstaja in ali se bo zaradi izteka veljavnosti ukrepov nadaljeval.
As a second step, in accordance with the basic Regulation, the possible implications of the interim reviews on the findings of the original Regulation on a country-by-country basis were examined.
Drugi korak, v skladu z osnovno uredbo, je bila proučitev možnih posledic vmesnih pregledov na ugotovitve osnovne uredbe glede na posamezne države.
The general methodology set out below has been applied to all exporting producers in the countries concerned and is the same as in the original investigation.
Splošna metodologija, določena spodaj, se je uporabljala za vse proizvajalce izvoznike v zadevnih državah in je enaka kot v osnovni uredbi.
The presentation of the findings of dumping for each of the countries concerned therefore only describes what is specific for each exporting country.
Ugotovitve dampinga za vsako posamezno zadevno državo zato samo opisujejo posebnosti za posamezno državo izvoznico.
For the determination of normal value it was first established for each exporting producer whether its total domestic sales of the product concerned were representative in comparison with its total export sales to the Community.
Za določanje normalne vrednosti se je za vsakega proizvajalca izvoznika najprej ugotovilo, ali je bila njegova skupna domača prodaja zadevnega izdelka reprezentativna v primerjavi z njegovo skupno izvozno prodajo v Skupnost.
Subsequently, those types of the product concerned sold domestically by the exporting producers having overall representative domestic sales and that were identical or directly comparable to the types sold for export to the Community, were identified.
Nato so bile opredeljene tiste vrste zadevnega izdelka, ki so jih na domačem trgu prodali proizvajalci izvozniki, ki imajo v celoti reprezentativno domačo prodajo, in so enake ali neposredno primerljive z vrstami, prodanimi za izvoz v Skupnost.
For each type sold by the exporting producers on their domestic markets and found to be directly comparable with the types of SWR sold for export to the Community, it was established whether domestic sales were sufficiently representative for the purposes of Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Za vsako vrsto, ki so jo proizvajalci izvozniki prodali na svojem domačem trgu in za katero je bilo ugotovljeno, da je neposredno primerljiva z vrstami SWR, ki so bile prodane za izvoz v Skupnost, je bilo ugotovljeno, ali je domača prodaja v zadostni meri reprezentativna za namene člena 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
Domestic sales of a particular type of SWR were considered sufficiently representative when the total domestic sales volume of that type during the ERIP or relevant interim review investigation period represented 5 % or more of the total sales volume of the comparable SWR type exported to the Community.
Domača prodaja posamezne vrste SWR se je štela za dovolj reprezentativno, če je obseg skupne domače prodaje te vrste med OPPIU ali ustreznim obdobjem preiskave vmesnega pregleda predstavljal 5 % ali več skupnega obsega prodaje primerljive vrste SWR, izvožene v Skupnost.
An examination was also made of whether the domestic sales of each type of SWR could be regarded as having been made in the ordinary course of trade, pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Preverjeno je bilo, ali se domača prodaja vsake vrste SWR lahko šteje, kot da je bila opravljena v običajnem poteku trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
This was done by establishing, for each exporting producer in the countries concerned, the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market of each exported type of the product concerned on the domestic market during the investigation period.
To je bilo opravljeno za vsakega proizvajalca izvoznika v zadevnih državah z ugotovitvijo deleža dobičkonosne prodaje vsake vrste izvoženega zadevnega izdelka na domačem trgu med obdobjem preiskave neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu.
For those product types where more than 80 %, by volume, of sales on the domestic market were not below unit costs, i.e. where the average sales price of the product type concerned was equal to or higher than the average production cost for the product type concerned, normal value was calculated as the average price of all domestic sales of the product type in question irrespective of whether these sales were profitable or not.
Za tiste vrste izdelka, kjer več kot 80 % obsega prodaje na domačem trgu ni bilo opravljenega pod stroški na enoto, tj. kadar je bila povprečna prodajna cena zadevne vrste izdelka enaka ali višja od povprečnih proizvodnih stroškov zadevnega izdelka, je bila normalna vrednost izračunana kot povprečna cena vse domače prodaje zadevnega izdelka, ne glede na to, ali je bila ta prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne.
For those product types where at least 10 % but no more than 80 %, by volume, of sales on the domestic market were not below unit costs, normal value was calculated as the weighted average sales price of those transactions which were made at or above unit costs of the type in question.
Za tiste vrste izdelka, pri katerih vsaj 10 %, vendar ne več kakor 80 % obsega prodaje na domačem trgu, ni bilo pod stroški na enoto, je bila normalna vrednost izračunana kot tehtano povprečje prodajnih cen tistih transakcij, ki so bile izvedene po ali nad stroški na enoto zadevne vrste izdelka.
For those product types where less than 10 %, by volume, was sold on the domestic market at a price not below unit cost, it was considered that the product type concerned was not sold in the ordinary course of trade and therefore, normal value had to be constructed in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
Za vrste izdelka, pri katerih je bilo manj kot 10 % obsega na domačem trgu prodanega po ceni, ki ni bila pod stroški na enoto, je veljalo, da zadevna vrsta izdelka ni bila prodana med običajnim potekom trgovanja, zato je morala biti normalna vrednost določena v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe.
In the cases where normal values had to be constructed, they were constructed in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, i.e. on the basis of the manufacturing cost of the type concerned, to which was added an amount for selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses and a margin of profit.
Kadar je bilo treba določiti normalne vrednosti, je bilo to storjeno v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe, tj. na podlagi proizvodnih stroškov zadevne vrste izdelka, ki so jim bili prišteti zneski za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške (PSA) ter stopnja dobička.
The amount of SG&A was that incurred by the exporting producer for the like product and the amount of profit equated to the average profit realised by the exporting producer on sales of the like product in the ordinary course of trade.
Znesek PSA stroškov je bil določen na podlagi stroškov proizvajalca izvoznika podobnega izdelka, znesek dobička pa izračunan na povprečnem dobičku, ki ga je ustvaril proizvajalec izvoznik s prodajo podobnega izdelka med običajnim potekom trgovine.
In all cases where the product concerned was exported to independent customers in the Community, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, namely on the basis of export prices actually paid or payable.
V vseh primerih, kjer je bil zadevni izdelek izvožen neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti, je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe, in sicer na podlagi izvoznih cen, ki so bile dejansko plačane ali se plačujejo.
In cases where sales were made via a related importer or trader, the export price was constructed on the basis of the resale prices of that related importer to independent customers.
V primerih, ko je prodaja potekala preko povezanega uvoznika ali trgovca, je bila izvozna cena konstruirana na podlagi cen povezanega uvoznika pri nadaljnji prodaji neodvisnim strankam.
Adjustments were made for all costs incurred between importation and resale including sales, general and administrative expenses, and a reasonable profit margin, in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Izvedene so bile prilagoditve za vse stroške, do katerih je prišlo med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, vključno s stroški prodaje, splošnimi in administrativnimi stroški ter ustrezno stopnja dobička, v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
The appropriate profit margin was established on the basis of information provided by unrelated cooperating traders/importers operating on the Community market.
Ustrezna stopnja dobička je bila določena na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij sodelujočih nepovezanih trgovcev/uvoznikov, ki delujejo na trgu Skupnosti.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences affecting the price and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Za zagotovitev pravične primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno so bile narejene prilagoditve za razlike, ki so vplivale na cene in primerljivost cen v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
Appropriate adjustments were granted in all cases where they were found to be reasonable, accurate and supported by evidence.
Ustrezne prilagoditve so bile odobrene v vseh primerih, kjer je bilo ugotovljeno, da so smiselne, točne in podprte z dokazi.
Adjustments were made for inland and ocean freight, insurance costs, handling and packaging costs, credit costs and import duties, which were all deducted from the resale price in order to arrive at an ex-works basis.
Za določitev franko tovarna so bile opravljene prilagoditve stroškov za notranji in čezmorski prevoz, zavarovanje, obdelavo in pakiranje, stroškov kredita in uvoznih dajatev, ki so bile vse odštete od cene pri nadaljnji prodaji.
In accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation, a dumping margin was calculated for each cooperating exporting producer, by comparing the weighted average normal value with the weighted average export price.
V skladu s členom 2(11) in členom 2(12) osnovne uredbe je bila stopnja dampinga za vsakega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika izračunana na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno.
For those countries where the level of cooperation was found to be high (above 80 % of all volumes imported to the Community during the ERIP or relevant RIP), and where there was no reason to believe that any exporting producer abstained from cooperating, the residual dumping margin was set at the level of the cooperating exporting producer with the highest dumping margin in order to ensure the effectiveness of the measures.
Za zagotovitev učinkovitosti ukrepov je bila preostala stopnja dampinga za tiste države, kjer je bila stopnja sodelovanja visoka (nad 80 % vsega uvoza v Skupnost med OPPIU ali ustreznim OPP), in tam kjer se je štelo, da se noben proizvajalec izvoznik ni vzdržal sodelovanja, določena glede na sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika z najvišjo stopnjo dampinga.
For those countries where the level of cooperation was found to be low (less than 80 % of all volumes imported to the Community during the ERIP or relevant RIP), the residual dumping margin was determined in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, i.e. on the basis of facts available.
Za tiste države, kjer je bila stopnja sodelovanja nizka (manj kot 80 % vsega uvoza v Skupnost med OPPIU ali ustreznim OPP), je bila preostala stopnja dampinga določena v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe, tj. na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev.
Dumping of imports during the review investigation periods — Country specific findings
Damping uvoza med obdobji preiskave v zvezi s pregledom – ugotovitve za posamezno državo
There are two exporting producers known to produce SWR in Russia: Severstal-Metiz, Cherepovets (SSM) and BMK, Beloretsk (BMK).
V Rusiji sta znana dva proizvajalca izvoznika SWR: Severstal-Metiz, Cherepovets („SSM“) in BMK, Beloretsk („BMK“).