natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Regarding the level of employment within the Community industry and the downstream industry, it is noteworthy that during a number of years, the Community industry has been suffering from low priced, dumped, imported PSF causing a situation in which employment continuously decreased, as shown in recital 99.
Glede na raven zaposlenosti v industriji Skupnosti in industriji na koncu proizvodne verige je treba opomniti, da so na industrijo Skupnosti več let vplivale nizke dampinške cene RVP, zaradi česar se je zaposlenost nenehno manjšala, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (99).
The fact that more people are employed in the downstream industry than in the PSF production does not in itself justify to put at risk a Community industry which can merely be less labour intensive than the downstream industry and which is, as demonstrated in recital 154 above, also vital for the users, since all the cooperating users purchased partially the Community product.
Dejstvo, da je v industriji na koncu proizvodne verige zaposlenih več ljudi kot v proizvodnji RVP, samo po sebi ne upravičuje ogrožanja industrije Skupnosti, ki je lahko le manj delovno intenzivna kot industrija na koncu proizvodne verige in je, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (154), prav tako bistvenega pomena za uporabnike, saj so vsi sodelujoči uporabniki del izdelkov kupovali v Skupnosti.
Regarding the likely impact on the downstream industry's financial situation, the information available on the cost structure of the user industry, the level of the proposed measures and the share between dumped imports and the other sources of supply indicate that:
V zvezi z verjetnim vplivom na finančno stanje industrije na koncu proizvodne verige so informacije, ki so na voljo o strukturi stroškov industrije uporabnikov, ravni predlaganih ukrepov in deležu dampinškega uvoza v primerjavi z drugimi viri, naslednje:
PSF represents between 10 % and 40 % of the users total cost of production of downstream products,
RVP predstavlja med 10 % in 40 % celotnih stroškov uporabnikov pri proizvodnji izdelkov na koncu proizvodne verige;
the average anti-dumping duty is about 24,9 % for the countries concerned,
povprečna protidampinška dajatev je približno 24,9 % za zadevne države;
the share of dumped imports is 15,3 % of total consumption of PSF.
delež dampinškega uvoza je 15,3 % celotne potrošnje RVP.
The proposed measures may thus have the impact of increasing the cost of production of users by between 0,4 % to a maximum of 1,5 %.
Tako lahko predlagani ukrepi povečajo stroške proizvodnje uporabnikov za 0,4 % do največ 1,5 %.
This likely maximum increase is considered to be relatively low when compared to the positive impact of the proposed measures in restoring effective competition on the Community market.
To največje povečanje se šteje za nizko, če se ga primerja s pozitivnim učinkom predlaganih ukrepov na obnavljanje učinkovite konkurence na trgu Skupnosti.
This analysis on the impact of the proposed measures on users therefore indicated that the imposition of anti-dumping measures is not likely to trigger an increase in the import of cheap downstream products into the Community.
Ta analiza učinka predlaganih ukrepov na uporabnike je torej pokazala, da uvedba protidampinških ukrepov ne bo povzročila povečanja uvoza poceni izdelkov na koncu proizvodne verige v Skupnost.
This conclusion was also reached in the absence of any evidence from the users concerned substantiating their claim, e.g. that past measures on this product had led to such effects.
To je bilo sklenjeno brez kakršnih koli dokazov zadevnih uporabnikov, ki bi podprli njihove trditve, na primer da so tako vplivali pretekli ukrepi, uvedeni za ta izdelek.
Impact on suppliers of raw materials
Vpliv na dobavitelje surovin
One provider of raw materials has cooperated in the present proceeding by submitting a response to the questionnaire.
En dobavitelj surovin je sodeloval pri trenutnem postopku tako, da je predložil odgovore na vprašalnik.
It supplies the PSF industry with PTA and MEG and has expressly supported the imposition of duties which would allow the Community industry to remain viable and would also secure his own position.
Ta dobavitelj, ki industriji RVP dobavlja PTK in MEG, je izrecno podprl uvedbo dajatev, ki bi industriji Skupnosti omogočile, da ostane uspešna, in bi tudi zaščitile njegov položaj.
Taking into account all of the above factors, and taking into account the level of measures as well as the termination of the proceeding against Australia, Indonesia, Thailand and India, it is concluded that the imposition of measures would not have a significantly negative effect, if any at all, on the situation of the users and importers of the product concerned.
Ob upoštevanju zgornjih dejstev in ravni ukrepov ter zaključka postopka proti Avstraliji, Indoneziji, Tajski in Indiji se sklene, da uvedba ukrepov ne bi imela pomembnega negativnega učinka (če bi ga sploh imela) na položaj uporabnikov in uvoznikov zadevnega izdelka.
It is also recalled that in the previous proceedings concerning the same product, the adoption of measures was considered not to be against the interest of the Community.
Opozoriti je treba, da je v prejšnjih postopkih v zvezi z istim izdelkom veljalo, da sprejem ukrepov ni v nasprotju z interesi Skupnosti.
On this basis, it is provisionally concluded that there are no compelling reasons not to impose anti-dumping measures.
Na tej podlagi se začasno sklene, da ni tehtnih razlogov proti uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov.
In view of the provisional conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Community interest, provisional measures should be imposed in order to prevent further injury being caused to the Community industry by the dumped imports.
Glede na začasne sklepe, sprejete v zvezi z dampingom, škodo, vzroki škode in interesom Skupnosti, bi bilo treba uvesti začasne ukrepe, da se prepreči nadaljnja škoda, ki jo industriji Skupnosti povzroča dampinški uvoz.
For the purpose of establishing the level of the provisional measures, account has been taken of both the dumping margin found and the amount of duty necessary to eliminate the injury sustained by the Community industry.
Pri določitvi stopnje začasnih ukrepov sta se upoštevala tako ugotovljena stopnja dampinga kot znesek dajatve, potrebne za odpravo škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
The provisional measures should be imposed at a level sufficient to eliminate the injury caused by these imports without exceeding the dumping margin found.
Začasni ukrepi se uvedejo na dovolj visoki stopnji, da se odpravi škoda, ki jo je povzročil ta uvoz, brez preseganja ugotovljene stopnje dampinga.
When calculating the amount of duty necessary to remove the effects of the injurious dumping, it was considered that any measures should allow the Community industry to cover its costs of production and obtain overall a profit before tax that could be reasonably achieved by an industry of this type in the sector under normal conditions of competition, i.e. in the absence of dumped imports, on the sales of the like product in the Community.
Pri izračunu zneska dajatve, potrebnega za odpravo učinkov škodljivega dampinga, se je upoštevalo, da morajo ukrepi industriji Skupnosti omogočiti, da pokrije stroške proizvodnje in ima dobiček pred odbitkom davka, ki bi ga razumno lahko imela industrija istega tipa pri prodaji podobnega izdelka v Skupnosti pod normalnimi konkurenčnimi pogoji, tj. brez dampinškega uvoza.
The investigation confirmed that in the absence of dumped imports the Community industry should yield a profit before taxes of 5 %.
Preiskava je potrdila, da bi imela Skupnost, če ne bi bilo dampinškega uvoza, dobiček pred odbitkom davka v višini 5 %.
This profit should allow the industry to cover its costs.
Ta dobiček bi industriji omogočil, da pokrije svoje stroške.
On this basis a non-injurious price was calculated for the Community industry of the like product.
Na tej podlagi je bila izračunana neškodljiva cena za industrijo Skupnosti, ki proizvaja podobni izdelek.
The non-injurious price has been obtained by adding the above mentioned profit margin of 5 % to the cost of production.
Neškodljiva cena je bila izračunana tako, da so se zgoraj navedeni stopnji dobička v višini 5 % prišteli stroški proizvodnje.
The necessary price increase was then determined on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average import price, as established for the undercutting calculations, with the average non-injurious price.
Potrebno zvišanje cene je bilo nato določeno na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne uvozne cene, kot je bila določena za izračune nelojalnega nižanja cen, s povprečno neškodljivo ceno.
Any difference resulting from this comparison was then expressed as a percentage of the average import CIF value.
Kakršna koli razlika, ki izhaja iz te primerjave, je bila nato izražena kot odstotek povprečne uvozne vrednosti CIF.
In the light of the foregoing, it is considered that a provisional anti-dumping duty should be imposed at the level of the dumping margin found, but should not be higher than the injury margin calculated above in accordance with Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na navedeno velja, da bi morale biti začasne protidampinške dajatve uvedene na ravni ugotovljene stopnje dampinga, a ne bi smele biti višje od stopnje škode, izračunane zgoraj v skladu s členom 7(2) osnovne uredbe.
The individual company anti-dumping duty rates specified in this Regulation were established on the basis of the findings of the present investigations.
Individualne protidampinške stopnje dajatev za družbe, navedene v tej uredbi, so bile določene na podlagi ugotovitev trenutnih preiskav.
Therefore, they reflect the situation found during these investigations with respect to the cooperating companies.
Zato odražajo stanje sodelujočih družb, ki je bilo ugotovljeno med temi preiskavami.
These duty rates (as opposed to the residual duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of products originating in the countries concerned and produced by the companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Te stopnje dajatev (v nasprotju s preostalo dajatvijo, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“) se zato uporabljajo izključno za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz zadevnih držav, ki jih proizvajajo navedene družbe, se pravi posebni pravni subjekti.
Imported products produced by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation with its name and address, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and shall be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Uvoženi izdelki, ki jih proizvaja katera koli druga družba, ki ni posebej navedena v operativnem delu te uredbe, z imenom in naslovom, vključno s subjekti, povezanimi s tistimi, ki so izrecno navedeni, teh stopenj ne morejo koristiti in za njih velja stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual company anti-dumping duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting-up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [10] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company's activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with e.g. that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vse zahteve za uporabo teh individualnih protidampinških stopenj dajatev za družbe (npr. po spremembi imena subjekta ali po vzpostavitvi novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih subjektov) je treba nemudoma nasloviti na Komisijo [10] z vsemi ustreznimi informacijami, zlasti z morebitnimi spremembami dejavnosti družbe, povezanimi s proizvodnjo, domačo prodajo in izvozno prodajo, povezano z npr. to spremembo imena ali to spremembo v proizvodnih in prodajnih subjektih.
In order to ensure a proper enforcement of the anti-dumping duty, the residual duty level should not only apply to the non-cooperating exporting producers, but also to those producers which did not have any exports to the Community during the IP.
Da bi se protidampinška dajatev ustrezno uveljavila, mora raven preostale dajatve veljati ne le za nesodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike, ampak tudi za tiste proizvajalce, ki v OP niso izvažali v Skupnost.
However, with regard to exporting producers in Malaysia, for which no sampling was applied, those latter companies are invited, when they fulfil the requirement of Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation, second paragraph, to present a request pursuant to that Article in order to have their situation examined individually.
Vendar pa so te družbe v primeru proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Malezije, pri katerih ni bilo vzorčenja, vabljene, da potem, ko izpolnijo zahteve iz drugega odstavka člena 11(4) osnovne uredbe, v skladu s tem členom vložijo zahtevo, da se njihovo stanje prouči individualno.
Anti-dumping duty (in %)
Protidampinška dajatev ( v %)
In the interests of sound administration, a period should be fixed within which the interested parties, which made themselves known within the time limit specified in the notice of initiation, may make their views known in writing and request a hearing.
Za dobro upravljanje je treba določiti obdobje, v katerem lahko zainteresirane stranke, ki se javijo v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku, pisno predložijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
A provisional anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on synthetic staple fibres of polyesters, not carded, not combed or otherwise processed for spinning, falling within CN code 55032000, originating in Malaysia and Taiwan.
Uvede se začasna protidampinška dajatev na sintetična rezana vlakna iz poliestra, nemikana, nečesana ali kako drugače predelana za predenje, ki se uvrščajo pod oznako KN 55032000, s poreklom iz Malezije in Tajvana.
The rate of the provisional anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, of the products described in paragraph 1, shall be as follows:
Stopnja začasne protidampinške dajatve za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti pred plačilom dajatve za izdelke, opisane v odstavku 1, je:
Taric Additional code
Dodatna oznaka TARIC
The release for free circulation in the Community of the product referred to in paragraph 1 shall be subject to the provisions of a security, equivalent to the amount of the provisional duty.
Sprostitev izdelka iz odstavka 1 v prost promet v Skupnosti je predmet varščine, ki je enaka znesku začasne dajatve.
Without prejudice to Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, the interested parties may make their views known in writing and apply to be heard orally by the Commission within one month of the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Ne glede na člen 20 Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 lahko zainteresirane stranke pisno predstavijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo, da jih Komisija ustno zasliši v roku enega meseca od datuma začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
Pursuant to Article 21(4) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, the parties concerned may comment on the application of this Regulation within one month of its entry into force.
V skladu s členom 21(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 lahko zadevne stranke predložijo pripombe o uporabi te uredbe v roku enega meseca od začetka njene veljavnosti.
OJ L 340, 23.12.2005, p. 17.
UL L 340, 23.12.2005, str. 17.
OJ C 89, 12.4.2006, p. 2.
UL C 89, 12.4.2006, str. 2.
OJ L 282, 13.10.2006, p. 1.
UL L 282, 13.10.2006, str. 1.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2006/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2006/2006
amending Regulation (EC) No 950/2006 to include the annual tariff quota for sugar products originating in Croatia
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 950/2006 glede vključitve letnih tarifnih kvot za proizvode iz sladkorja s poreklom iz Hrvaške
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector [1], and in particular Article 40(1)(e)(iii),
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 318/2006 z dne 20. februarja 2006 o skupni ureditvi trgov v sektorju sladkorja [1] in zlasti člena 40(1)(e)(iii) Uredbe,
Pursuant to Article 27(5) of and Annex IV(h) to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Croatia, of the other part [2], as amended by the Protocol approved by Council Decision (EC) No 2006/882/EC of 13 November 2006 [3], the Community is to allow duty-free access for imports into the Community of products originating in Croatia falling within CN codes 1701 and 1702, within the limit of an annual quantity of 180000 tonnes (net weight).
V skladu s členom 27(5) in Prilogo IV(h) k Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenemu sporazumu med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani in Republiko Hrvaško na drugi strani [2], kakor je bil spremenjen s Protokolom, odobrenim z Odločbo Sveta 2006/882/ES z dne 13. novembra 2006 [3], se Skupnosti odobri brezcarinski dostop za uvoz proizvodov s poreklom iz Hrvaške, ki spadajo pod oznako KN 1701 in 1702, v okviru omejitev letne količine 180000 ton (neto teže), v Skupnost.
The Protocol to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement with Croatia enters into force on 1 January 2007.
Protokol k Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenemu sporazumu s Hrvaško začne veljati 1. januarja 2007.
The tariff quota for sugar products originating in Croatia should therefore be opened as from that date.
Zato je treba s tem datumom odpreti tarifno kvoto za proizvode iz sladkorja z izvorom iz Hrvaške.
That quota should be opened and administered in accordance with Commission Regulation No 950/2006 of 28 June 2006 laying down detailed rules of application for the 2006/2007, 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 marketing years for the import and refining of sugar products under certain tariff quotas and preferential agreements [4], as ‘Balkans sugar’ within the meaning of that Regulation.
To kvoto je treba odpreti in upravljati v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 950/2006 z dne 28. junija 2006 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje uvoza in prečiščevanja proizvodov v sektorju sladkorja v okviru nekaterih tarifnih kvot in preferencialnih sporazumov za tržna leta 2006/2007, 2007/2008 in 2008/2009 [4] za „balkanski sladkor“ v smislu Uredbe.
Since Article 28 of that Regulation opens the tariff quotas for Balkans sugar on a marketing year basis, the annual tariff quota for sugar products originating in Croatia should be adjusted for the remaining nine months of the marketing year 2006/2007.
Ker člen 28 navedene uredbe odpira tarifne kvote za balkanski sladkor na podlagi tržnega leta, je treba letno tarifno kvoto za proizvode iz sladkorja s poreklom iz Hrvaške prilagoditi za preostalih devet mesecev tržnega leta 2006/2007.
Regulation (EC) No 950/2006 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 950/2006 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Regulation (EC) No 950/2006 is amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 950/2006 se spremeni:
In Article 1(1), the following point is added:
Členu 1(1) se doda točka:
Article 27(5) of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Croatia.’
členu 27(5) Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega sporazuma med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani in Republiko Hrvaško.“
Quantities imported in accordance with the provisions referred to in paragraph 1(c) to (h) (hereinafter referred to as “tariff quotas”), and with the provisions referred to in points (a) and (b) of that paragraph (hereinafter referred to as “delivery obligations”) for the 2006/2007, 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 marketing years shall bear the quota serial numbers shown in Annex I.’
Količine, ki so za tržna leta 2006/2007, 2007/2008 in 2008/2009 uvožene v skladu z določbami iz točk (c) in (h) odstavka 1 (v nadaljnjem besedilu ‚tarifne kvote‘) in določbami iz točk (a) in (b) (v nadaljnjem besedilu ‚obveznosti dobave‘), so označene z zaporednimi številkami iz Priloge 1.“
In Article 2, point (d) is replaced by the following:
V členu 2 se točka (d) nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
“Balkans sugar” means sugar products falling within CN codes 1701 and 1702 originating in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro, Kosovo, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia or Croatia and imported into the Community under Regulation (EC) No 2007/2000, the Stabilisation and Association Agreement with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and the Stabilisation and Association Agreement with the Republic of Croatia;’
‚balkanski sladkor‘ pomeni proizvode iz sektorja sladkorja, ki sodijo pod oznaki KN 1701 in 1702, s poreklom iz Albanije, Bosne in Hercegovine, Srbije, Črne gore, Kosova, Nekdanje jugoslovanske republike Makedonije ali Hrvaške in so uvoženi v Skupnost v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2007/2000, Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo in Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenim sporazumom z Republiko Hrvaško;“
Article 28 is replaced by the following:
Člen 28 se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
‘Article 28
„Člen 28
For each marketing year, duty-free tariff quotas for a total of 380000 tonnes of sugar products falling within CN codes 1701 and 1702 shall be opened as Balkans sugar.
Za vsako tržno leto se odprejo tarifne kvote za skupaj 380000 ton proizvodov v sektorju sladkorja iz oznak KN 1701 in 1702, ki se ga uvozi kot balkanski sladkor s stopnjo dajatve nič.
However, for the 2006/2007 marketing year the quantity shall be 381500 tonnes of sugar products falling with CN codes 1701 and 1702.
Vendar pa količina proizvodov iz sektorja sladkorja iz oznak KN 1701 in 1702 za tržno leto 2006/2007 znaša 381500 ton.
Albania 1000 tonnes,
Albanija 1000 ton,
Bosnia-Herzegovina 12000 tonnes,
Bosna in Hercegovina 12000 ton,
Serbia and Montenegro 180000 tonnes,
Srbija in Črna gora 180000 ton,
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 7000 tonnes,
Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija 7000 ton,
Croatia 180000 tonnes.
Hrvaška 180000 ton,
Albania 1250 tonnes,
Albanija 1250 ton,
Bosnia-Herzegovina 15000 tonnes,
Bosna in Hercegovina 15000 ton,
Serbia and Montenegro 225000 tonnes,
Srbija in Črna gora 225000 ton,
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 5250 tonnes,
Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija 5250 ton,
Croatia 135000 tonnes.
Hrvaška 135000 ton,
The quotas for the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Croatia for the 2006/2007 marketing year shall be opened from 1 January 2007 only.’
Kvoti za Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo in Hrvaško se za tržno leto 2006/2007 odpreta šele 1. januarja 2007.“
In Article 29, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:
V členu 29 se odstavek 2 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Import licence applications for Balkans sugar from the customs territories of Montenegro, Serbia, Kosovo or Croatia shall be accompanied by the original of the export licence issued by the competent authorities of the customs territories of Montenegro, Serbia, Kosovo or Croatia in accordance with the model in Annex II for a quantity equal to that in the licence application.’
Zahtevku za uvozno dovoljenje za balkanski sladkor s poreklom iz carinskih območij Črne gore, Srbije, Kosova ali Hrvaške je treba priložiti izvirnik izvoznega dovoljenja, ki ga izdajo pristojni organi carinskih območij Črne gore, Srbije, Kosova ali Hrvaške v skladu z vzorcem iz Priloge II, za količino, ki je enaka količini, navedeni na zahtevku za dovoljenje.“
OJ L 341, 7.12.2006, p. 31.
UL L 341, 7.12.2006, str. 31.
In Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 950/2006, the table relating to serial numbers for Balkans sugar is replaced by the following:
V Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 950/2006 se preglednica s serijskimi številkami za balkanski sladkor nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Serial numbers for Balkans sugar
„Serijske številke za balkanski sladkor
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2007/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2007/2006