natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As regards inaccurate, incomplete or no longer up-to-date data transmitted or made available to another Member State and further processed by quasi-judicial authorities, meaning authorities with powers to make legally binding decisions, its rectification, erasure or blocking should be carried out in accordance with national law.
V zvezi z netočnimi, nepopolnimi podatki ali podatki, ki niso posodobljeni in ki so posredovani ali dani na razpolago drugi državi članici ter nadalje obdelani s strani organov, ki odločajo kot sodišče, s čimer so mišljeni organi, ki sprejemajo pravno zavezujoče odločitve, bi se njihovo popravljanje, izbris ali blokiranje moralo izvesti v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo.
Ensuring a high level of protection of the personal data of individuals requires common provisions to determine the lawfulness and the quality of data processed by competent authorities in other Member States.
Za zagotavljanje visoke stopnje varstva osebnih podatkov posameznikov so potrebne skupne določbe, ki bodo opredeljevale zakonitost in kakovost podatkov, ki jih obdelujejo pristojni organi v drugih državah članicah.
It is appropriate to lay down at the European level the conditions under which competent authorities of the Member States should be allowed to transmit and make available personal data received from other Member States to authorities and private parties in Member States.
Primerno je, da se na evropski ravni določi pogoje, pod katerimi bi pristojni organi držav članic smeli posredovati osebne podatke, ki so jih prejeli od drugih držav članic, in omogočati dostop do njih organom in zasebnim strankam v državah članicah.
In many cases the transmission of personal data by the judiciary, police or customs to private parties is necessary to prosecute crime or to prevent an immediate and serious threat to public security or to prevent serious harm to the rights of individuals, for example, by issuing alerts concerning forgeries of securities to banks and credit institutions, or, in the area of vehicle crime, by communicating personal data to insurance companies in order to prevent illicit trafficking in stolen motor vehicles or to improve the conditions for the recovery of stolen motor vehicles from abroad.
Posredovanje osebnih podatkov s strani pravosodnih organov, policije ali carinskih organov zasebnim strankam je v mnogih primerih potrebno zaradi pregona kaznivih dejanj ali preprečitve neposredne in resne ogroženosti javne varnosti oziroma zaradi preprečitve hujše škode pravicam posameznikov, na primer z izdajo opozoril bankam in kreditnim institucijam v zvezi s ponarejanjem vrednostnih papirjev, ali na področju kaznivih dejanj, povezanih z vozili, s sporočanjem osebnih podatkov zavarovalnicam, da se prepreči prepovedana trgovina z ukradenimi motornimi vozili ali izboljšajo pogoji za vrnitev ukradenih vozil iz tujine.
This is not tantamount to the transfer of police or judicial tasks to private parties.
To ni enakovredno prenosu policijskih in pravosodnih nalog na zasebne stranke.
The rules in this Framework Decision regarding the transmission of personal data by the judiciary, police or customs to private parties do not apply to the disclosure of data to private parties (such as defence lawyers and victims) in the context of criminal proceedings.
Pravila iz tega okvirnega sklepa o posredovanju osebnih podatkov s strani pravosodnih organov, policije ali carinskih organov zasebnim strankam se ne nanašajo na razkritje osebnih podatkov zasebnim strankam (kot so odvetniki ali žrtve) v okviru kazenskega postopka.
The further processing of personal data received from, or made available by, the competent authority of another Member State, in particular the further transmission of or making available such data, should be subject to common rules at European level.
Nadaljnjo obdelavo osebnih podatkov, ki jih pošlje oz. do njih omogoči dostop pristojni organ druge države članice, zlasti pa nadaljnje posredovanje teh podatkov oziroma omogočanje dostopa do njih, bi bilo treba urediti s skupnimi pravili na evropski ravni.
Where personal data may be further processed after the Member State from which the data were obtained has given its consent, each Member State should be able to determine the modalities of such consent, including, for example, by means of a general consent for categories of information or categories of further processing.
Če se osebni podatki lahko nadalje obdelajo potem, ko je država članica, od katere so bili podatki prejeti, dala soglasje, bi lahko države članice same določile podrobnosti glede soglasja, med drugim tudi z možnostjo splošnega soglasja za vrste podatkov ali za vrst nadaljnje obdelave.
Where personal data may be further processed for administrative proceedings, these proceedings also include activities by regulatory and supervisory bodies.
Če se osebni podatki lahko nadalje obdelajo za namene upravnih postopkov, ti postopki vsebujejo tudi dejavnosti regulativnih in nadzornih organov.
The legitimate activities of the police, customs, judicial and other competent authorities may require that data are sent to authorities in third States or international bodies that have obligations for the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties.
Legitimno delovanja policije, carine, pravosodnih in drugih pristojnih organov lahko zahtevajo, da se podatke pošlje organom v tretjih državah ali mednarodnim telesom, ki imajo obveznosti v zvezi s preprečevanjem, preiskovanjem, odkrivanjem ali pregonom kaznivih dejanj ali izvrševanjem kazni.
Where personal data are transferred from a Member State to third States or international bodies, these data should, in principle, benefit from an adequate level of protection.
Kadar se osebni podatki posredujejo iz države članice tretjim državam ali mednarodnim telesom, bi morali ti podatki načeloma imeti zagotovljeno ustrezno raven varstva.
Where personal data are transferred from a Member State to third States or international bodies, such transfer should, in principle, take place only after the Member State from which the data were obtained has given its consent to the transfer.
Kadar se osebni podatki posredujejo iz države članice tretjim državam ali mednarodnim telesom, bi moral biti tak prenos načeloma možen samo po pridobitvi soglasja države članice, ki je posredovala podatke.
Each Member State should be able to determine the modalities of such consent, including, for example, by means of a general consent for categories of information or for specified third States.
Vsaka država članica bi morala imeti možnost sama določiti podrobnosti glede soglasja, med drugim tudi z možnostjo splošnega soglasja za določene vrste podatkov ali za določene tretje države.
The interests of efficient law enforcement cooperation require that where the nature of a threat to the public security of a Member State or a third State is so immediate as to render it impossible to obtain prior consent in good time, the competent authority should be able to transfer the relevant personal data to the third State concerned without such prior consent.
Interesi učinkovitega sodelovanja na področju kazenskega pregona zahtevajo, da lahko v primeru, če je ogrožanje javne varnosti države članice ali tretje države tako neposredno, da ni možno pravočasno pridobiti predhodnega soglasja, bi moral pristojni organ imeti možnost posredovati ustrezne osebne podatke tretji državi brez predhodnega soglasja.
The same could apply where other essential interests of a Member State of equal importance are at stake, for example where the critical infrastructure of a Member State could be the subject of an immediate and serious threat or where a Member State’s financial system could be seriously disrupted.
Enako velja, če so ogroženi drugi, enako pomembni bistveni interesi države članice, na primer, če bi bila kritična infrastruktura države članice v neposredni in resni nevarnosti ali če bi bil resno ogrožen njen finančni sistem.
It may be necessary to inform data subjects regarding the processing of their data, in particular where there has been particularly serious encroachment on their rights as a result of secret data collection measures, in order to ensure that data subjects can have effective legal protection.
Lahko se zgodi, da je potrebno posameznike, na katere se osebni podatki nanašajo, obvestiti o obdelavi njihovih podatkov, zlasti v primerih posebno resnega poseganja v njihove pravice zaradi tajnega pridobivanja podatkov, in tem posameznikom tako zagotoviti možnost učinkovitega pravnega varstva.
Member States should ensure that the data subject is informed that the personal data could be or are being collected, processed or transmitted to another Member State for the purpose of prevention, investigation, detection, and prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da se posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, obvesti, da se osebni podatki zbirajo, obdelujejo ali posredujejo ali bi se lahko zbirali, obdelovali ali posredovali za namene preprečevanja, preiskovanja, odkrivanja in pregona kaznivih dejanj ali izvrševanja kazni.
The modalities of the right of the data subject to be informed and the exceptions thereto should be determined by national law.
Podrobnosti glede pravice posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, do obveščenosti in izjeme s tem v zvezi bi morale biti določene z nacionalnim pravom.
This may take a general form, for example, through the law or through the publication of a list of the processing operations.
To lahko poteka v splošni obliki, na primer z zakonom ali z objavo seznama postopkov obdelave.
In order to ensure the protection of personal data without jeopardising the interests of criminal investigations, it is necessary to define the rights of the data subject.
Da bi zagotovili varstvo osebnih podatkov brez ogrožanja interesov kazenskih preiskav, je treba določiti pravice posameznika, na katerega se osebni podatki nanašajo.
Some Member States have provided for the right of access of the data subject in criminal matters through a system where the national supervisory authority, in place of the data subject, has access to all the personal data related to the data subject without any restriction and may also rectify, erase or update inaccurate data.
Nekatere države članice so zagotovile pravico dostopa posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, v kazenskih zadevah prek sistema, v katerem ima nacionalni nadzorni organ, namesto posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, neomejen dostop do vseh osebnih podatkov posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, in lahko tudi popravlja, briše ali posodablja netočne podatke.
In such a case of indirect access, the national law of those Member States may provide that the national supervisory authority will inform the data subject only that all the necessary verifications have taken place.
V takšnem primeru posrednega dostopa lahko nacionalna zakonodaja zadevnih držav članic določa, da bo nacionalni nadzorni organ posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, obvestil le, da so bila opravljena vsa potrebna preverjanja.
However, those Member States also provide for possibilities of direct access for the data subject in specific cases, such as access to judicial records, in order to obtain copies of own criminal records or of documents relating to own hearings by the police services.
Vendar pa te države članice posamezniku, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, v posebnih primerih zagotovijo tudi možnosti neposrednega dostopa, kot so dostop do sodnih spisov, pridobitev kopij lastnih kazenskih evidenc ali dokumentov v zvezi z lastnimi obravnavami s strani služb policije.
It is appropriate to establish common rules on confidentiality and security of processing, on liability and penalties for unlawful use by competent authorities and on judicial remedies available to the data subject.
Primerno je, da se določijo skupna pravila o zaupnosti in varnosti obdelave, o odgovornosti in kaznih za nezakonito uporabo s strani pristojnih organov ter o pravnih sredstvih, ki so na voljo posamezniku, na katerega se osebni podatki nanašajo.
It is, however, for each Member State to determine the nature of its tort rules and of the penalties applicable to violations of domestic data protection provisions.
Ne glede na to pa vsaka država članica določi naravo svojih odškodninskih pravil in kazni, ki se uporabljajo pri kršitvah njihovih določb o varstvu podatkov.
This Framework Decision allows the principle of public access to official documents to be taken into account when implementing the principles set out in this Framework Decision.
Ta okvirni sklep omogoča upoštevanje načela dostopa javnosti do uradnih dokumentov pri izvajanju načel iz tega okvirnega sklepa.
When necessary to protect personal data in relation to processing which by scale or by type holds specific risks for fundamental rights and freedoms, for example processing by means of new technologies, mechanisms or procedures, it is appropriate to ensure that the competent national supervisory authorities are consulted prior to the establishment of filing systems aimed at the processing of these data.
Če je pri obdelavi, ki po obsegu ali vrsti vključuje posebna tveganja za temeljne pravice in svoboščine, treba varovati osebne podatke, na primer pri obdelavi z novimi tehnologijami, mehanizmi ali postopki, je primerno zagotoviti, da se pred oblikovanjem zbirk, cilj katerih je obdelava teh podatkov, posvetuje s pristojnimi nacionalnimi nadzornimi organi.
The establishment in Member States of supervisory authorities, exercising their functions with complete independence, is an essential component of the protection of personal data processed within the framework of police and judicial cooperation between the Member States.
Ustanovitev nadzornih organov v državah članicah, ki popolnoma neodvisno opravljajo svoje naloge, je bistveni del varstva osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja med državami članicami.
The supervisory authorities already established in Member States under Directive 95/46/EC should also be able to assume responsibility for the tasks to be performed by the national supervisory authorities to be established under this Framework Decision.
Nadzorni organi, ki so že bili ustanovljeni v državah članicah v skladu z Direktivo 95/46/ES, bi morali imeti možnost izvajati tudi naloge, ki so v skladu s tem okvirnim sklepom podeljene nacionalnim nadzornim organom.
Such supervisory authorities should have the necessary means to perform their duties, including powers of investigation and intervention, particularly in cases of complaints from individuals, or powers to engage in legal proceedings.
Takšni nadzorni organi bi morali imeti za opravljanje svojih nalog potrebna sredstva, vključno s pooblastili za preiskave in ukrepanje, predvsem v primerih pritožb posameznikov, ali pooblastila za sodelovanje v pravnih postopkih.
These supervisory authorities should help to ensure transparency of processing in the Member States within whose jurisdiction they fall.
Ti nadzorni organi bi morali pomagati zagotoviti preglednost obdelave v državi članici, v katere pristojnost sodijo.
However, their powers should not interfere with specific rules set out for criminal proceedings or the independence of the judiciary.
Vendar pa njihova pooblastila ne smejo posegati v posebna pravila, določena za kazenske postopke, ali v neodvisnost sodstva.
Article 47 of the Treaty on European Union stipulates that nothing in it is to affect the Treaties establishing the European Communities or the subsequent Treaties and Acts modifying or supplementing them.
Člen 47 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji določa, da nobena od njegovih določb ne vpliva na Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropskih skupnosti ali kasnejše pogodbe in akte, ki jih spreminjajo ali dopolnjujejo.
Accordingly, this Framework Decision does not affect the protection of personal data under Community law, in particular as provided for in Directive 95/46/EC, in Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [4] and in Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) [5].
Zato ta okvirni sklep ne vpliva na varstvo osebnih podatkov po zakonodaji Skupnosti, zlasti kakor je predvideno v Direktivi 95/46/ES, v Uredbi (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [4] ter v Direktivi 2002/58/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. julija 2002 o obdelavi osebnih podatkov in varstvu zasebnosti na področju elektronskih komunikacij (Direktiva o zasebnosti in elektronskih komunikacijah) [5].
This Framework Decision is without prejudice to the rules pertaining to illicit access to data laid down in Council Framework Decision 2005/222/JHA of 24 February 2005 on attacks against information systems [6].
Ta okvirni sklep ne posega v pravila, ki se nanašajo na nedovoljen dostop do podatkov, kot je določeno v Okvirnem sklepu Sveta 2005/222/PNZ z dne 24. februarja 2005 o napadih na informacijske sisteme [6].
This Framework Decision is without prejudice to existing obligations and commitments incumbent upon Member States or upon the Union by virtue of bilateral and/or multilateral agreements with third States.
Ta okvirni sklep ne posega v obstoječe obveznosti in zaveze, ki jih imajo države članice ali Unija po dvostranskih in/ali večstranskih sporazumih s tretjimi državami.
Future agreements should comply with the rules on exchanges with third States.
Prihodnji sporazumi bi morali biti skladni s pravili o izmenjavi podatkov s tretjimi državami.
Several acts, adopted on the basis of Title VI of the Treaty on European Union, contain specific provisions on the protection of personal data exchanged or otherwise processed pursuant to those acts.
Več aktov, sprejetih na podlagi naslova VI Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, vsebuje posebne določbe o varstvu osebnih podatkov, izmenjanih ali drugače obdelanih na podlagi navedenih aktov.
In some cases these provisions constitute a complete and coherent set of rules covering all relevant aspects of data protection (principles of data quality, rules on data security, regulation of the rights and safeguards of data subjects, organisation of supervision and liability) and they regulate these matters in more detail than this Framework Decision.
V nekaterih primerih vsebujejo navedene določbe celovit in skladen niz pravil ter zajemajo vse vidike varstva podatkov (načela kakovosti podatkov, pravila o varnosti podatkov, urejanje pravic in zaščitnih ukrepov za posameznike, na katere se osebni podatki nanašajo, organizacija nadzora in odgovornosti), te zadeve pa urejajo natančneje kakor ta okvirni sklep.
The relevant set of data protection provisions of those acts, in particular those governing the functioning of Europol, Eurojust, the Schengen Information System (SIS) and the Customs Information System (CIS), as well as those introducing direct access for the authorities of Member States to certain data systems of other Member States, should not be affected by this Framework Decision.
Ta okvirni sklep ne bi smel vplivati na ustrezni niz določb o varstvu podatkov iz navedenih aktov, zlasti ne na tiste, ki urejajo delovanje Europola, Eurojusta, Schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS) in Carinskega informacijskega sistema (CIS), prav tako ne bi smel vplivati na akte, ki uvajajo neposredni dostop organov držav članic do nekaterih sistemov podatkov drugih držav članic.
The same applies in respect of the data protection provisions governing the automated transfer between Member States of DNA profiles, dactyloscopic data and national vehicle registration data pursuant to the Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime [7].
Isto velja za določbe o varstvu podatkov, ki urejajo avtomatiziran prenos profilov DNK, daktiloskopskih podatkov in nacionalnih podatkov o registraciji vozil med državami članicami na podlagi sklepa Sveta 2008/615/PNZ z dne 23. junija 2008 o pospešitvi čezmejnega sodelovanja, zlasti na področju boja proti terorizmu in čezmejnemu kriminalu [7].
In other cases the provisions on data protection in acts, adopted on the basis of Title VI of the Treaty on European Union, are more limited in scope.
V drugih primerih je področje uporabe določb o varstvu podatkov v aktih, sprejetih na podlagi naslova VI Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, bolj omejeno.
They often set specific conditions for the Member State receiving information containing personal data from other Member States as to the purposes for which it can use those data, but refer for other aspects of data protection to the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data of 28 January 1981 or to national law.
Ti akti državi članici, ki od drugih držav članic pridobiva informacije, ki vsebujejo osebne podatke, pogosto postavljajo posebne pogoje, in sicer glede namenov za katere sme uporabiti pridobljene podatke, v zvezi z drugimi vidiki varstva podatkov pa se sklicujejo na Konvencijo Sveta Evrope z dne 28. januarja 1981 o varstvu posameznikov glede na avtomatsko obdelavo osebnih podatkov ali na nacionalno zakonodajo.
To the extent that the provisions of those acts imposing conditions on receiving Member States as to the use or further transfer of personal data are more restrictive than those contained in the corresponding provisions of this Framework Decision, the former provisions should remain unaffected.
Nespremenjene ostanejo tudi določbe aktov, ki določajo pogoje za države članice prejemnice glede uporabe in nadaljnjega posredovanja osebnih podatkov, če so bolj omejujoče od enakovrednih določb tega okvirnega sklepa.
However, for all other aspects the rules set out in this Framework Decision should be applied.
Vendar pa bi bilo treba za vse druge vidike uporabiti pravila iz tega okvirnega sklepa.
This Framework Decision does not affect the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, the Additional Protocol to that Convention of 8 November 2001 or the Council of Europe conventions on judicial cooperation in criminal matters.
Ta okvirni sklep ne vpliva na Konvencijo Sveta Evrope o varstvu posameznikov glede na avtomatsko obdelavo osebnih podatkov ali na dodatni protokol k tej konvenciji z dne 8. novembra 2001 ali konvencij Sveta Evrope o pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah.
Since the objective of this Framework Decision, namely the determination of common rules for the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, and can therefore, by reason of the scale and effects of the action, be better achieved at the Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty establishing the European Community and referred to in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker cilja tega okvirnega sklepa, in sicer določitve skupnih pravil za varstvo osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, države članice same ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči,in jih je zato zaradi obsega in učinkov ukrepov lažje doseči na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in iz člena 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.