natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Imports originating in other third countries (average price)
Uvoz iz drugih držav zunaj Skupnosti (povprečna cena)
Taiwan (index)
Tajvan (indeks)
Compared to the provisional Regulation, the main difference consists in the quantities of USA imports and the trend that can be observed as regards those imports.
V primerjavi z začasno uredbo je glavna razlika v količini uvoza ZDA in trendu, ki ga je mogoče opaziti glede navedenega uvoza.
Indeed, during the period considered, there was a slight increase of imports of PVA from the USA only, i.e. an increase by 2 percentage points in terms of market share whereas it was erroneously concluded in the provisional Regulation that they had doubled during that period.
V obravnavanem obdobju je prišlo do rahlega povečanja uvoza PVA zgolj iz ZDA, npr. povečanje za 2 odstotni točki v smislu tržnega deleža, medtem ko je bilo v začasni uredbi napačno ugotovljeno, da je bil uvoz v tem obdobju dvakrat obsežnejši.
Furthermore, the CIF Community frontier prices of these imports appear to be generally higher than provisionally concluded, with prices that were 4,3 % higher during the IP.
Poleg tega so uvozne cene CIF na meji Skupnosti očitno na splošno višje, kot so bile začasno določene cene, ki so bile 4,3 % višje v OP.
The other conclusions with regard to these imports, as summarised in recital 98 of the provisional Regulation, remain valid.
Druge ugotovitve, ki se nanašajo na ta uvoz in so povzete v uvodni izjavi 98 začasne uredbe, ostanejo veljavne.
Referring to recitals 97 and 99 of the provisional Regulation, several interested parties expressed serious doubts as to the reliability of the Eurostat prices on Japanese imports, as the average unit prices of these imports were significantly higher than the unit prices of PVA from other sources.
Več zainteresiranih strank je izrazilo resne dvome glede zanesljivosti podatkov o cenah japonskega uvoza, ki jih je podal Eurostat in so navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 97 in 99 začasne uredbe, saj so bile povprečne cene na enoto tega uvoza občutno višje od cen na enoto PVA iz drugih virov.
One interested party claimed that the high average sales price could stem from an erroneous inclusion of other more expensive products, such as PVB.
Ena izmed zainteresiranih strank je trdila, da bi visoka povprečna prodajna cena lahko izhajala iz napačne vključitve drugih dražjih izdelkov, kot je PVB.
In this respect, it is important to underline that these data had been investigated in detail and that on the basis of that analysis it had been concluded, as indicated in recital 99 of the provisional Regulation, that Japanese imports could not have contributed to the negative price trend which led to the serious deterioration of the Community industry’s financial situation.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da so bili ti podatki natančno preučeni in da je bilo na podlagi te analize, kot je to razvidno iz uvodne izjave 99 začasne uredbe, ugotovljeno, da japonski uvoz ni prispeval k negativnemu gibanju cen, ki je vodilo do resnega poslabšanju finančnega položaja industrije Skupnosti.
For the sake of completeness and clarity, a summary of this analysis follows.
Zaradi popolnosti in jasnosti sledi povzetek te analize.
A further examination of the Eurostat data concerning imports from Japan confirmed that it did not include any products other than PVA and that, hence, the data were not inflated by more expensive products.
Nadaljnji pregled podatkov Eurostata, ki so bili povezani z uvozom iz Japonske, je potrdil, da razen PVA niso bili vključeni nobeni drugi izdelki in zato cene niso bile umetno zvišane zaradi dražjih izdelkov.
Further, as was already indicated in the complaint, the Japanese PVA imports included certain limited quantities of PVA other than the like product, with probably significantly higher unit prices.
Nadalje, kot je že bilo navedeno v pritožbi, je japonski uvoz PVA vključeval določene omejene količine PVA, ki niso bile podobni izdelki in so imele verjetno veliko višje cene na enoto.
In the average value computed for Japanese imports, based on the statistical data, the price influence of these other PVA-grades could not be neutralised as these data do not distinguish the like product from other PVA-grades.
Pri povprečni vrednosti, ki je bila izračunana za japonski uvoz in je temeljila na statističnih podatkih, vpliva cene PVA drugih kakovosti ni bilo mogoče nevtralizirati, saj ti podatki ne razlikujejo podobnega izdelka od PVA drugih kakovosti.
However, taking into account the approximate volumes of such imports, based on the data in the complaint, and in view of the average price computed for all Japanese PVA imports during the IP, it had been established that it would be very unlikely that the exclusion of the PVA grades not falling under the product definition would result in an average CIF Community frontier price of the like product, which would undercut the Community sales price level during the IP.
Vendar pa je bilo ob upoštevanju približnih količin tovrstnega uvoza, ki temeljijo na podatkih iz pritožbe, in glede na povprečno ceno, izračunano za celoten japonski uvoz PVA v OP, ugotovljeno, da bi bilo zelo malo verjetno, da bi izvzetje kakovosti PVA, ki niso vključene v opredelitev izdelka, privedlo do povprečne cene CIF na meji Skupnosti za podobni izdelek, ki bi nelojalno znižala prodajne cene Skupnosti v OP.
Moreover, around 25 % of the Japanese imports during the IP could be verified and they concerned PVA grades falling under the product scope.
Poleg tega je 25 % japonskega uvoza v OP mogoče preveriti in se nanaša na kakovosti PVA, ki so vključene v opredelitev izdelka.
These sales were made to related parties, i.e. at transfer prices, and it had been found that the resale prices of these purchases to the first independent customers in the Community were on average 8 to 10 % above the prices that the Community industry could obtain.
Te prodaje so bile izvedene za povezane kupce, tj. po transfernih cenah, in ugotovljeno je bilo, da so bile cene pri nadaljnji prodaji teh nakupov prvim neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti v povprečju za 8–10 % višje od cen, ki bi jih lahko postavila industrija Skupnosti.
It was consequently concluded and it is maintained that there are no indications that Japanese imports of PVA, during the IP, have undercut the Community industry prices and, therefore, they are not considered to have contributed to the injury suffered by the Community industry.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da ni dokazov, da je zaradi japonskega uvoza PVA v OP prišlo do nelojalnega nižanja cen industrije Skupnosti, zato uvoz ni prispeval k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
It was also questioned by several interested parties how Japanese imports managed to maintain a strong market share with such high prices, if there was a fierce price competition on the Community market.
Več zainteresiranih strank se je tudi spraševalo, kako je lahko japonski uvoz obdržal močan tržni delež s tako visokimi cenami, če je bila na trgu Skupnosti močna cenovna konkurenca.
In this respect, it should first be noted, as mentioned in recital 83 above, that the inclusion of other and more expensive grades of PVA certainly has inflated the Eurostat average values of Japanese import prices.
V zvezi s tem je treba najprej poudariti, kot je bilo navedeno že v zgornji uvodni izjavi 83, da je vključitev drugih in dražjih PVA zagotovo znižala povprečne vrednosti japonskih uvoznih cen.
Based on verified data pertaining to around 25 % of Japanese imports, average prices of these imports to the first independent customer in the Community appear rather to be 8 to 10 % above the Community industry prices.
Na podlagi preverjenih podatkov, ki veljajo za okrog 25 % uvoza iz Japonske, se zdijo povprečne cene tega uvoza za prvo neodvisno stranko v Skupnosti prej 8 do 10 % višje od cen industrije Skupnosti.
This is not the result of a precise comparison between identical grades; it is rather the likely and approximate price difference between the average sales prices of a part of Japanese imports and the average sales price obtained by the Community industry.
To ni rezultat natančne primerjave med izdelki iste kakovosti; gre za verjetno in približno razliko med povprečnimi prodajnimi cenami dela japonskega uvoza in povprečnimi prodajnimi cenami, ki jih je dosegla industrija Skupnosti.
On that basis, the result of the analysis of the Japanese import prices does not contradict the conclusion that market prices in the Community were indeed depressed, and the argument is dismissed.
Rezultat analize japonskih uvoznih cen ni v nasprotju z ugotovitvijo, da so se tržne cene v Skupnosti resnično znižale, zato se argument zavrne.
One interested party claimed that the volumes of Taiwanese imports had increased from 2003 to 2006, contrary to the Commission’s findings of a market share decrease, and that the average prices of these imports increased less than what the Commission had found.
Ena izmed zainteresiranih strank je trdila, da se je količina tajvanskega uvoza povečala v obdobju med letoma 2003 in 2006, kar je v nasprotju z ugotovitvami Skupnosti glede zmanjšanja tržnega deleža, in da so se povprečne cene pri omenjenem uvozu zvišale za manj, kot je ugotovila Komisija.
This claim was based on an analysis of Eurostat data.
Ta trditev temelji na analizi podatkov Eurostata.
In this respect, it should be noted that, as indicated in recital 100 of the provisional Regulation, the actual figures of the sole Taiwanese producer have been used as it fully cooperated in the investigation.
Zato je treba poudariti, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 100 začasne uredbe, da so bile pri preiskavi uporabljene dejanske vrednosti edinega tajvanskega proizvajalca, ki je v njej sodeloval.
These verified data were considered more reliable than Eurostat data, especially as this producer also sold, throughout the period considered, significant quantities of PVA which were covered by CN code ex39053000 but did not fall under the product definition.
Ti preverjeni podatki so se šteli za bolj zanesljive kot podatki Eurostata, še zlasti, ker je ta proizvajalec v obravnavanem obdobju prodal znatne količine PVA, zajetega z oznako KN ex39053000, vendar niso spadale v okvir opredelitve izdelka.
The claim of this interested party, therefore, had to be dismissed.
Trditev omenjene zainteresirane stranke je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
Another interested party claimed, in view of the Commission’s analysis of USA import prices that Taiwanese imports would have contributed to the price depression on the Community market.
Druga zainteresirana stranka je glede analize uvoznih cen ZDA, ki jo je izvedla Komisija, trdila, da je tajvanski uvoz prispeval k znižanju cen na trgu Skupnosti.
It alleged that for the purpose of computing average prices to first independent customer, the Commission had adjusted Eurostat’s USA import prices, which were already above Taiwanese prices, upwards and so adjusted, these prices were at the same general level as Community industry prices.
Navedla je, da je Komisija z namenom izračuna povprečnih cen za prvo neodvisno stranko zaokrožila uvozne cene ZDA po Eurostatu navzgor, te pa so bile že prej nad tajvanskimi cenami in so bile po tej prilagoditvi na splošno na isti ravni kot cene industrije Skupnosti.
Therefore, Taiwanese prices, which would not need any adjustment, would be undercutting the Community industry prices and contribute to the injury suffered by the Community industry.
Zato so tajvanske cene, ki jih ne bi bilo treba prilagoditi, nelojalno nižale cene industrije Skupnosti in prispevale k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
In fact, the prices of Taiwanese imports in recitals 97 and 100 of the provisional Regulation are the prices at cif Community frontier level.
Cene tajvanskega uvoza v uvodnih izjavah 97 in 100 začasne uredbe so cene CIF na meji Skupnosti.
For the purpose of the undercutting calculations, a number of adjustments have been made to those prices (import duty, post importation costs, level of trade).
Za namen izračunov nelojalnega nižanja cen je bilo pri teh cenah izvedeno veliko število prilagoditev (uvozna dajatev, stroški po uvozu, raven trgovanja).
In this case, the level of trade adjustment was significant as virtually all sales were done via traders/distributors in the Community.
V tem primeru je bila pomembna prilagoditev ravni trgovanja, saj so bile vse prodaje izvedene prek trgovcev/distributerjev v Skupnosti.
The subsequent undercutting calculations could then be done at PCN-level, thus resulting in very precise figures which did indeed not show undercutting.
Nadaljnji izračuni nelojalnega nižanja cen bi se potem lahko izvedli na ravni PCN in tako zagotovili zelo natančne vrednosti, ki niso kazale nikakršnega nelojalnega nižanja cen.
Several interested parties claimed that the drop in profitability was caused by the Community industry itself.
Več zainteresiranih strank je trdilo, da je zmanjšanje dobičkonosnosti povzročila sama industrija Skupnosti.
They claimed that because of the creation of extra production capacity in 2004, the Community industry found itself confronted with large additional quantities of produced PVA which it had to sell.
Trdile so, da se je zaradi vzpostavitve dodatne proizvodne zmogljivosti v letu 2004 industrija Skupnosti soočala z velikimi dodatnimi količinami proizvedenega PVA, ki ga je morala prodati.
It was argued by these parties that the complainant itself would therefore have engaged in an aggressive policy of undercutting all other PVA suppliers with a view to maximising its sales volumes and excluding other competitors from the market.
Te stranke so navedle, da naj bi si zato sam pritožnik prizadeval za agresivno politiko nelojalnega nižanja cen vseh ostalih dobaviteljev PVA z namenom povečanja prodaje in izključitve ostalih konkurentov s trga.
According to these parties, this would explain the decline in PVA prices during the period considered.
Po trditvah teh strank bi to lahko pojasnilo znižanje cen PVA v obravnavanem obdobju.
They considered that the Chinese producers were price followers rather than price setters.
Menili so, da so kitajski proizvajalci cenam na trgu bolj sledili kot pa jih oblikovali.
With regard to this argument, the investigation has indeed shown that the investments made by the Community industry to increase production capacity have enabled the Community industry to sell significant additional quantities on the Community market.
Ob upoštevanju tega argumenta je preiskava res pokazala, da so naložbe, ki jih je industrija Skupnosti izvedla za povečanje zmogljivosti proizvodnje, omogočile industriji Skupnosti, da je prodala znatne dodatne količine na trgu Skupnosti.
This fact demonstrates, on the one hand, that the decision to make this investment had been a sound decision in terms of expected market growth.
To dejstvo po eni strani dokazuje, da je bila odločitev o izvedbi naložb dobra odločitev v smislu pričakovane rasti trga.
The consumption of PVA on the Community market had increased strongly during the period considered, as explained in recitals 51 to 53, and this had led to increasing sales overall.
Potrošnja PVA na trgu Skupnosti se je v obravnavanem obdobju močno povečala, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 51 do 53, to pa je povzročilo splošno povečanje prodaje.
Furthermore, an analysis of post-IP data (July 2006 until September 2007) concerning Community consumption and sales based on Eurostat data and figures provided by parties subject to the investigation has confirmed that consumption increased significantly and that the Community industry further increased its sales volumes by 10 %.
Poleg tega je analiza podatkov po OP (od julija 2006 do septembra 2007) glede potrošnje in prodaje Skupnosti, ki temelji na podatkih Eurostata in vrednostih, ki so jih predložile stranke, vključene v preiskavo, je potrdila, da se je potrošnja močno povečala in da je industrija Skupnosti količino prodaje še povečala za 10 %.
At the same time, however, it was established by the investigation that a PVA plant should produce continuously in order to maximise efficiency.
Hkrati je bilo pri preiskavi ugotovljeno, da mora obrat za proizvodnjo PVA proizvajati neprekinjeno, da doseže največji učinek.
This was also the case for the Community industry.
Tako je bilo tudi v primeru industrije Skupnosti.
The investigation showed that due to the expansion of capacity which took place from 2004 to 2006, the production volumes increased significantly as from 2004.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se je zaradi povečanja zmogljivosti v obdobju od 2004 do 2006 količina proizvodnje v primerjavi z letom 2004 občutno povečala.
The Community industry, following definitive disclosure, argued that the additional PVA production line was only available as of 2005 and that, thus, there was no additional capacity in 2004.
Po dokončnem razkritju je industrija Skupnosti trdila, da je bila dodatna proizvodna linija PVA na voljo šele od leta 2005 in tako leta 2004 ni bilo povečanja zmogljivosti.
However, the investigation has shown that during 2004 the production capacity was 7 % higher as compared to 2003.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da je bila leta 2004 zmogljivost proizvodnje 7 % višja kot leta 2003.
At the same time, the Community industry decreased its sales prices by 7 %, and in 2005, when the production capacity had reached 129 % of the capacity during 2003, prices were still 5 % below the 2003 level, in spite of strongly increasing raw material costs as indicated in recital 72 (+ 19 % for VAM).
Sočasno je industrija Skupnosti znižala svoje prodajne cene za 7 % in v letu 2005, ko je večanje zmogljivosti proizvodnje doseglo 129 % zmogljivosti iz leta 2003, so bile cene kljub zelo naraščajočim stroškom surovin še vedno 5 % nižje kot leta 2003, kakor je navedeno v zgornji uvodni izjavi 72 (+ 19 % za VAM).
In the meantime, the Community industry had increased its sales volumes to independent customers by 12 % and it further increased those sales by another 10 percentage points in 2005.
Medtem je industrija Skupnosti povečala količino prodaje neodvisnim strankam za 12 % in v letu 2005 še povečala to prodajo za 10 odstotnih točk.
On this basis, it appears that there might be a relation between the sales prices of the Community industry and the quantity of PVA produced.
Na podlagi tega se zdi, da obstaja zveza med prodajnimi cenami industrije Skupnosti in količino proizvedenega PVA.
Two interested parties argued that the investment in production capacity had caused the negative development of the key financial indicators, as the cost of it would have weighed heavily on the Community industry’s profitability.
Dve zainteresirani stranki sta trdili, da je naložba v zmogljivost proizvodnje povzročila negativen razvoj ključnih finančnih kazalnikov, saj je strošek močno obremenil dobičkonosnost industrije Skupnosti.
In this respect, the investigation has established, as stated in recital 103 of the provisional Regulation, that the costs involved with the production capacity expansion could be identified and that they did not significantly influence the dramatically negative trend observed in the development of the financial position of the Community industry.
Glede tega je bilo v preiskavi ugotovljeno, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 103 začasne uredbe, da je bilo stroške, ki so nastali zaradi širitve zmogljivosti proizvodnje, mogoče določiti in da niso pomembno vplivali na dramatično negativni trend, do katerega je prišlo v razvoju finančnega položaja industrije Skupnosti.
The claim that these costs had caused the strong deterioration of the Community industrys most important financial indicators, therefore, has to be dismissed.
Trditev, da so ti stroški povzročili veliko poslabšanje najpomembnejših finančnih kazalnikov industrije Skupnosti, je zato treba zavrniti.
One interested party claimed that pricing of the sales for captive use would have negatively influenced the profitability figures of the complainant.
Ena izmed zainteresiranih strank je trdila, da bi določanje cen prodaje za lastne potrebe negativno vplivalo na dobičkonosnost pritožnika.
In this respect it is to be noted that the sales of PVA to related parties have been verified in depth.
Glede tega je treba poudariti, da je bila prodaja PVA povezanim strankam temeljito preverjena.
Firstly, these sales were isolated from the sales to unrelated parties.
Prodaja je bila najprej ločena od prodaje nepovezanim strankam.
They are therefore not included in the financial indicators provided in recitals 84 and 85 of the provisional Regulation, as specifically mentioned in recital 84.
Zato ni vključena v finančne kazalnike, ki jih določata uvodni izjavi 84 in 85 začasne uredbe, kot je to izrecno navedeno v uvodni izjavi 84.
Secondly, the verification of the sales for captive use showed that the pricing of these sales, which represented less than 20 % of the Community industry total sales during the IP, did not have a negative impact on the reported result on the Community industry’s PVA sales to unrelated parties.
Nato je pregled prodaje za omejeno uporabo pokazal, da oblikovanje cen za prodajo, ki je predstavljala manj kot 20 % celotne prodaje industrije Skupnosti v OP, ni imelo negativnega vpliva na sporočeni rezultat glede prodaje PVA industrije Skupnosti nepovezanim strankam.
The claim was therefore dismissed.
Trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
Another interested party claimed that that the allegedly depressed construction market in Germany during the first years of the period considered would have caused the negative development of the key financial indicators of the Community industry.
Druga zainteresirana stranka je trdila, da je nemški trg gradbeništva, ki je bil v prvih letih obravnavanega obdobja domnevno v krizi, povzročil negativni razvoj ključnih finančnih kazalnikov industrije Skupnosti.
However, no evidence to demonstrate this was submitted and the statistical data clearly show a trend of increasing consumption for PVA and an even more marked trend of increasing consumption of PVB.
Vendar pa v zvezi s tem ni bilo predloženih nobenih dokazov in statistični podatki jasno kažejo na trend povečevanja potrošnje PVA ter še močnejši trend povečevanja potrošnje PVB.
The argument, therefore, had to be dismissed.
Utemeljitev je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
Following definitive disclosure, the Community industry claimed that by focussing on 2003 and 2004, no sufficient causation analysis of the years 2004 until 2006 was performed.
Po dokončnem razkritju je industrija Skupnosti trdila, da zaradi usmeritve na leti 2003 in 2004 ni bila opravljena vzročna analiza za leta od 2004 do 2006.
In this respect it is firstly to be noted that 2003 and 2004 are the first two years of the period considered and as such they can certainly not be regarded as outdated.
V zvezi s tem je treba najprej opozoriti, da sta 2003 in 2004 prvi dve leti obravnavanega obdobja in se ju zato nikakor ne sme obravnavati kot „zastaranih“.
Furthermore, as summarised in recital 91 of the provisional Regulation, the group of indicators showing injury are the financial indicators whilst most of the other indicators show a positive development.
Poleg tega, kot je povzeto v uvodni izjavi 91 začasne uredbe, so kazalniki, ki kažejo na škodo, finančni kazalniki, medtem ko večina drugih kazalnikov kaže na pozitiven razvoj.
In such a situation it is only reasonable that the investigating authority pays more attention to the period where the financial indicators deteriorated the strongest, which happened to be 2004 when the Community industrys profitability decreased by 62 %, its ROI decreased by 83 %, and its cash flow decreased by 45 %.
V takih razmerah je edino razumno, da preiskovalni organ več pozornosti posveti obdobju, ko so se finančni kazalniki najbolj poslabšali, kar je bilo leta 2004, ko se je dobičkonosnost industrije Skupnosti zmanjšala za 62 %, donosnost njenih naložb za 83 %, njen denarni tok pa za 45 %.