natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with Article 9(5)(e) of the basic Regulation, where Article 2(7)(a) applies, an individual duty can only be specified where an exporter can demonstrate, on the basis of properly substantiated claims, that State interference is not such as to permit circumvention of measures if individual exporters are given different rates of duty.
V skladu s členom 9(5)(e) osnovne uredbe se v primerih iz člena 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe individualna dajatev določi samo, ko izvoznik na podlagi utemeljenih trditev lahko dokaže, da se država ne vmešava toliko, da bi dovoljevala izogibanje ukrepom, če se individualnim izvoznikom dodelijo različne stopnje dajatve.
First, the company in question could not clarify the precise role and responsibilities of its General Manager.
Prvič, zadevna družba ni mogla pojasniti natančne vloge in odgovornosti generalnega direktorja.
It could neither clarify whether the current shareholders indeed paid for the shares that they own in the former State-owned company.
Niti ni mogla pojasniti, ali so sedanji delničarji za svoje delnice v nekdanji družbi v lasti države tudi dejansko plačali.
On this basis, it was a reasonable conclusion that significant State interference could not be sufficiently excluded.
Na tej podlagi je bilo sklenjeno, da znatnega državnega vmešavanja ni mogoče v zadostni meri izključiti.
The risk of circumvention was therefore considered too high and the exporting producer’s claims in this regard had to be rejected.
Štelo se je, da je tveganje izogibanja previsoko, zato je bilo treba zahteve proizvajalca izvoznika v zvezi s tem zavrniti.
Consequently, since it was found that the PRC producers did not meet all of the requirements for being granted IT in accordance with Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation, IT had to be rejected and a single country-wide duty imposed.
Zato in ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da proizvajalci iz LRK niso izpolnili vseh zahtev za odobritev IO v skladu s členom 9(5) osnovne uredbe, jim je bilo treba IO zavrniti in uvesti enotno dajatev za celotno državo.
According to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, normal value for the exporting producers not granted MET has to be established on the basis of the prices or constructed value in an analogue country or the price from such a third country to other countries, including the Community, or where those are not possible, on any other reasonable basis, including the price actually paid or payable in the Community for the like product, duly adjusted if necessary to include a reasonable profit margin.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe je treba normalno vrednost za proizvajalca izvoznika, ki mu TGO ni bil odobren, določiti na podlagi cen ali konstruirane vrednosti v primerljivi državi ali cene, ki velja pri izvozu iz te tretje države v ostale države, vključno s Skupnostjo, ali, kjer to ni mogoče, na kateri koli drugi razumni osnovi, vključno s ceno, ki se je dejansko plačevala ali se plačuje v Skupnosti za podoben izdelek, po potrebi primerno prilagojeno, tako da vsebuje razumno stopnjo dobička.
In the absence of production of the product concerned outside the Community and the PRC, the Commission indicated in the notice of initiation its intention to base the normal value, in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, on the prices actually paid or payable in the Community for the like product.
Ker se zadevni izdelek izven Skupnosti in LRK ne proizvaja, je Komisija v obvestilu o začetku v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe nameravala določiti normalno vrednost na dejansko plačanih cenah ali cenah, ki se plačujejo za podobni izdelek v Skupnosti.
The three PRC producers objected to this proposal, arguing that there was not sufficient competition within the Community and that the production process in the Community was not comparable with that in the PRC.
Trije proizvajalci izvozniki so nasprotovali temu predlogu z utemeljitvijo, da v Skupnosti ni bilo zadostne konkurence in da proizvodni procesi v Skupnosti niso primerljivi s tistimi na Kitajskem.
They claimed that normal value should be based on the export price of the complainant to the PRC or on the cost of production of DCD in the PRC.
Trdili so, da je treba normalno vrednost utemeljiti na izvozni ceni pritožnika v LRK ali na proizvodnih stroških DCD v LRK.
The export price of the Community industry to third countries could not be taken as it could not be excluded that these prices were equally dumped.
Izvozne cene industrije Skupnosti v tretje države ni bilo mogoče upoštevati, ker za njih ni bilo mogoče izključiti obstoja dampinga.
Thus, the exporting producers in question could not demonstrate that this methodology would be more reasonable than the one used by the Community institutions.
Zato zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik ni mogel dokazati, da bi bila ta metodologija primernejša kot metodologija, ki jo uporablja industrija Skupnosti.
In particular, it could not be demonstrated nor was there otherwise any evidence available that the competition in the Community market was insufficient and that, as a consequence, data relating to the Community industry would be unreliable.
Predvsem ni mogel dokazati, niti ni bilo na voljo drugih dokazov, da je konkurenca na trgu Skupnosti nezadostna in da bi bili zaradi tega nezanesljivi tudi podatki v zvezi z industrijo Skupnosti.
As far as differences in the production process are concerned, they were not considered significant.
Razlike v proizvodnih procesih se niso štele za pomembne.
Furthermore, none of the three companies was granted MET and therefore costs of manufacturing of the Chinese exporting producers were not considered reliable.
Poleg tega nobeni od treh družb TGO ni bil odobren in s tem proizvodni stroški kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov niso veljali za zanesljive.
On this basis, it was considered that the most reasonable basis for determining normal value was to use the Community industry’s cost of manufacturing of the like product adjusted where necessary, in particular to take into account differences in production processes and access to raw materials.
Na podlagi tega se je štelo, da so najprimernejša podlaga za določitev normalne vrednosti proizvodni stroški podobnega izdelka industrije Skupnosti, ki so bili po potrebi usztezno prilagojeni, zlasti, da se upoštevajo razlike v proizvodnih procesih in dostop do surovin.
The exporting producers claimed that the determination of the normal value was based on facts available and thus on Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Proizvajalci izvozniki so trdili, da je določitev normalne vrednosti temeljila na podatkih, ki so bili na voljo, torej v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
It was further claimed that since they fully cooperated in the present investigation, such approach was not justified.
Poleg tega so trdili, da tak pristop ni bil upravičen, ker so v sedanji preiskavi v celoti sodelovali.
These exporting producers’ allegation that normal value was determined in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation is incorrect.
Trditev teh proizvajalcev izvoznikov, da je bila normalna vrednost določena v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe, ne drži.
Indeed, as mentioned above, normal value was established in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, which allows to use any other reasonable basis should it not be possible to base normal value on costs and prices from an analogue country or on export prices from such a country to other third countries.
Kot je navedeno, je bila normalna vrednost določena v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe, ki omogoča uporabo katere koli razumne osnove, če normalne vrednosti ni mogoče določiti na podlagi stroškov in cen primerljive države ali na izvoznih cenah iz te države v druge tretje države.
This claim was therefore rejected.
Ta trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
The like product was sold by the Community industry in representative quantities.
Podobni izdelek je industrija Skupnosti prodala v reprezentativni količini.
However, the Community industry’s domestic sales were loss-making.
Vendar je domača prodaja industrije Skupnosti ustvarjala izgube.
Therefore, the normal value was based on the Community industry’s manufacturing costs plus a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative costs and profit.
Zato je normalna vrednost temeljila na proizvodnih stroških industrije Skupnosti, z dodanim ustreznim zneskom za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške ter za dobiček.
Adjustments were made on the Community industry’s manufacturing costs so as to offset the additional transport costs due to the physical separation between production units, no direct access to raw materials, which must be transported from remote production sites and disposal of the by-product (black lime).
Proizvodni stroški industrije Skupnosti so bili prilagojeni, da zajemajo dodatne stroške prevoza, ki nastanejo zaradi fizične ločitve proizvodnih enot, dejstvo, da ni neposrednega dostopa do surovin, ki jih je treba transportirati iz oddaljenih obratov, in odstranitev stranskega produkta.
Furthermore, an estimated profit corresponding to the profit achieved by the Community industry in 2001, was added, together with 4,3 % for SG&A based on information provided by the Community industry.
Poleg tega je bil na podlagi informacij, ki jih je preložila industrija Skupnosti, dodan ocenjeni dobiček, ki ustreza dobičku industrije Skupnosti iz leta 2001, skupaj s 4,3 % za PSA.
All export sales to the Community by the PRC producers were made directly to independent customers in the Community and therefore the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable.
Celoten izvoz proizvajalcev iz LRK v Skupnost je bil opravljen neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti, zato je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe, namreč na podlagi cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo.
The weighted average normal value as established above was compared with the weighted average export price of sales to the Community of the cooperating companies not granted MET, as provided under Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation.
Tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost, kot je bila določena zgoraj, je bila v skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe primerjana s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno sodelujočih družb, ki jim TGO ni bil odobren, v Skupnnost.
On this basis, the country-wide dumping margin, expressed as a percentage of the CIF import price at the Community border, duty unpaid, is 91,8 %.
Na tej podlagi znaša stopnja dampinga za celotno državo, izražena kot odstotek uvozne cene CIF meja Skupnosti, brez plačane dajatve 91,8 %.
As the analysis concerns only one company, for reasons of confidentiality most indicators are given in indexed form or ranges.
Glede na to, da se analiza nanaša samo na eno družbo, je zaradi zaupnosti podatkov večina kazalnikov predstavljenih v obliki indeksov ali pa so navedeni razponi.
Total Community production in the IP ranged between 15000 and 20000 tonnes.
Celotna proizvodnja industrije Skupnosti je med OP znašala med 15000 in 20000 tonami.
The production of the Community producer AlzChem GmbH represents 100 % of the DCD produced in the Community.
Proizvodnja sodelujočega proizvajalca Skupnosti AlzChem GmbH je predstavljala 100 % DCD, proizvedenega v Skupnosti.
It is therefore considered that it constitutes the Community industry (‘CI’) within the meaning of Articles 4(1) and 5(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se šteje, da ta družba predstavlja industrijo Skupnosti v smislu členov 4(1) in 5(4) osnovne uredbe.
Community consumption was established on the basis of the sales volume of the CI on the Community market plus imports from the PRC and other third countries under the relevant CN code according to Eurostat.
Po podatkih Eurostata je bila potrošnja Skupnosti določena na podlagi obsega prodaje industrije Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti ter uvoza iz LRK in drugih tretjih držav pod ustrezno oznako KN.
As shown in the table below, the Community consumption of the product concerned remained stable (+ 1 %) over the period considered.
Kot je prikazano v spodnji preglednici, je potrošnja Skupnosti zadevnega izdelka med obravnavanim obdobjem ostala nespremenjena (+ 1 %).
In this context, it has to be noted that the data concerning 2002 also include imports for the Norwegian producer, ODDA, which ceased activity the same year.
V tem okviru je treba opozoriti, da podatki v zvezi z letom 2002 vključujejo tudi uvoz norveškega proizvajalca ODDA, ki je isto leto prenehal z dejavnostjo.
According to an importer, ODDA’s closure led some of its larger customers to stock-pile in 2003, which may also explain why consumption peaked that year.
En uvoznik je trdil, da je zaprtje ODDA povzročilo, da so nekateri njegovi večji odjemalci v letu 2003 povečali zaloge, kar lahko pojasni povečanje potrošnje v navedenem letu.
Volume and market share of imports from the PRC
Obseg in tržni delež uvoza iz LRK
Imports from the PRC according to Eurostat increased from 2476 tonnes in 2002 to 6002 tonnes in the IP.
V skladu s podatki Eurostata se je uvoz iz LRK leta 2002 povečal z 2476 ton na 6002 toni v OP.
The market share increased from 15-25 % to 40-50 % during the same period, as the Chinese producers took over a major part of the market share previously held by the Norwegian producer ODDA.
Tržni delež se je v istem obdobju povečal z 15–25 % na 40–50 %, ker so kitajski proizvajalci prevzeli večji del tržnega deleža, ki ga je prej imel norveški proizvajalec ODDA.
The increase in imports was particularly marked in 2003.
Povečanje uvoza je še posebej značilno za leto 2003.
Based on Eurostat, the prices of imports decreased by 11 % over the period considered, from EUR 1149/tonne in 2002 to EUR 1022/tonne in the IP.
Na podlagi podatkov Eurostata, so se uvozne cene med obravnavanim obdobjem znižale za 11 %, s 1149 EUR/tono leta 2002 na 1022 EUR/tono v OP.
Import prices from the PRC (EUR/tonne)
Uvozne cene iz LRK v EUR/tono
To determine price undercutting, a comparison was made between the sales prices of the CI on the Community market during the IP and those charged by the Chinese exporting producers.
Za določitev nelojalnega nižanja cen je bila prodajna cena industrije Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti med OP primerjana s cenami, ki so jih zaračunali kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki.
Since the Chinese producers did not export the so-called micro DCD, this type was excluded from the calculation of the price undercutting.
Ker kitajski proizvajalci niso izvažali tako imenovanega mikro DCD, je bila ta vrsta izločena iz izračuna nelojalnega nižanja cen.
The relevant sales prices of the CI were those to independent customers, adjusted where necessary to an ex-works level.
Upoštevale so se zadevne prodajne cene industrije Skupnosti za neodvisne stranke, po potrebi prilagojene na raven franko tovarna.
These prices were compared with the sales prices charged by the exporting producers net of discounts and adjusted where necessary to CIF Community frontier prices with an appropriate adjustment for the customs clearance costs and post-importation costs.
Te cene so se primerjale s prodajnimi cenami, ki so jih proizvajalci izvozniki zaračunali brez popustov in so bile po potrebi prilagojene cenam CIF meja Skupnosti z ustrezno prilagoditvijo za stroške carinjenja in stroške po uvozu.
The applicable conventional third country duty of 6,5 % was added to the CIF price to obtain the free-circulation unit price.
Za določitev cene na enoto v prostem prometu je bila ceni CIF dodana običajna 6,5-odstotna dajatev za tretje države.
During the IP the weighted average undercutting margin expressed as a percentage of the CI’s average ex-works sales price, was between 25 % and 35 % for the cooperating Chinese producers.
Tehtana povprečna stopnja nelojalnega nižanja cen, izražena kot odstotek prodajne cene franko tovarna industrije Skupnosti, je bila med OP za sodelujoče kitajske proizvajalce med 25 in 35 %.
In accordance with Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, the examination of the impact of the dumped imports on the CI included an analysis of all economic factors having a bearing on the state of the industry from 2002 to the IP.
V skladu s členom 3(5) osnovne uredbe je proučitev učinka dampinškega uvoza na industrijo Skupnosti vsebovala analizo vseh gospodarskih dejavnikov, ki so vplivali na stanje industrije od leta 2002 do OP.
The injury factors presented below only concern sales on the free market, which represent 85 % of the production of DCD of the CI.
Navedeni dejavniki škode zadevajo samo prodajo na prostem trgu, ki predstavlja 85 % proizvodnje DCD industrije Skupnosti.
It has to be noted that the remaining 15 % of the production of DCD is internally used as captive transfer.
Treba je opozoriti, da je ostalih 15 % proizvodnje DCD interno uporabljenih za notranji prenos.
The CI is an integrated producer using DCD for further processing and transforming DCD for the production of downstream products, without issuing any commercial invoices.
Industrija Skupnosti je integriran proizvajalec, ki DCD uporablja za nadaljnjo predelavo in ga preoblikuje za proizvodnjo izdelkov na koncu proizvodne verige, brez izdajanja trgovskih faktur.
The captive consumption remained rather stable over the period considered and could therefore not have impacted on the situation of the Community industry.
Notranja potrošnja je v obravnavanem obdobju ostala relativno nespremenjena in zato ne bi mogla vplivati na stanje industrije Skupnosti.
The production capacity increased by 33 % between 2002 and the IP.
Proizvodna zmogljivost se je med letom 2002 in OP povečala za 33 %.
The capacity increase occurred during 2003 and 2004, after the closure of the Norwegian producer, ODDA, in late 2002.
Do povečanja je prišlo med letoma 2003 in 2004, po ustavitvi proizvodnje norveškega proizvajalca ODDA, konec leta 2002.
The additional production capacity should be viewed in the light of the fact that ODDA ceased production and that this company had already a share of around 25 % on the Community market and sold also to other markets.
Dodatne proizvodne zmogljivosti je treba upoštevati v okviru dejstva, da je ODDA prenehala s proizvodnjo in da je ta družba že imela 25-odstotni delež na trgu Skupnosti, prodajala pa je tudi na druge trge.
The increased production capacity was achieved through investments and technical improvements.
Povečanje proizvodne zmogljivosti je bilo doseženo z naložbami in tehničnimi izboljšavami.
As a result of increased capacity and sales, production volumes increased by 37 % between 2002 and the IP.
Povečanje zmogljivosti in prodaje je pomenilo 37-odstotno povečanje proizvodnje med letom 2002 in OP.
The largest increase occurred between 2002 and 2003.
Do največjega povečanja je prišlo med letoma 2002 in 2003.
Production volumes peaked in 2004 after which they decreased sharply in 2005 followed by an increase in the IP.
Proizvodnja je dosegla najvišjo točko leta 2004, se zelo zmanjšala leta 2005 in se nato med OP ponovno povečala.
Capacity utilisation increased by 3 percentage points over the period considered.
Izkoriščenost zmogljivosti se je v obravnavanem obdobju povečala za 3 odstotne točke.
Production (Index)
Proizvodnja (indeks)
Production capacity (Index)
Proizvodna zmogljivost (indeks)
Stocks increased significantly during the period considered.
V obravnavanem obdobju so se zaloge znatno povečale.
This was due to the fact that, because of the dumped imports, the CI could not increase its sales volume as much as it anticipated following the closure of ODDA, as explained further below.
Do tega je prišlo predvsem zato, ker industrija Skupnosti zaradi dampinškega uvoza ni mogla povečati svoje prodaje v obsegu, ki je bil načrtovan po zaprtju ODDA, kot je pojasnjeno v nadaljevanju.
Stocks (Index)
Zaloge (indeks)
While Community consumption remained stable, sales of DCD by the CI to independent customers on the Community market increased by 6 % over the period considered.
Medtem ko je v obravnavanem obdobju potrošnja Skupnosti ostala nespremenjena, se je prodaja DCD industrije Skupnosti neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti povečala za 6 %.
They reached a peak in 2003 and decreased steadily in 2004 and 2005 to increase slightly again during the IP.
Vrh je dosegla leta 2003, se enakomerno zmanjševala leta 2004 in 2005 ter se med OP rahlo povečala.
However, these sales were made constantly at prices significantly below the costs of production, with the exception of sales of micro DCD, which represent between 0 % and 10 % of the total sales [no precise figure given for reasons of confidentiality] on the Community market, and which were very profitable.
Vendar se je ta prodaja v vsem času odvijala po cenah, ki so bile znantno pod proizvodnimi stroški, razen prodaje mikro DCD, ki predstavlja med 0 in 10 % celotne prodaje (natančne vrednosti niso navedene zaradi zaupnosti) na trgu Skupnosti in je bila zelo dobičkonosna.
In addition, it is worth recalling that the CI uses its own-produced DCD for the production of other downstream chemical products, e.g. NCN derivates.
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da industrija Skupnosti lastno proizvodnjo DCD uporablja za proizvodnjo drugih kemičnih izdelkov na koncu proizvodne verige, tj. za derivate NCN.
This captive use represents approximately 15 % of the CI’s production of DCD.
Ta notranja uporaba pomeni približno 15 % proizvodnje DCD industrije Skupnosti.
Sales volumes and market shares were as follows:
Prodaja in tržni deleži so bili:
Sales volumes in the EC (Index)
Prodaja v ES (indeks)
The CI’s market share increased by 3 percentage points over the period considered.
Tržni delež industrije Skupnosti se je v obravnavanem obdobju povečal za 3 odstotne točke.
This, however, should be viewed in the light of the gap left on the market by the closure of ODDA in late 2002, which held a market share of around 25 % prior to its closure.
Vendar je treba to upoštevati z vidika vrzeli, ki jo je konec leta 2002 na trgu pustilo zaprtje ODDA, ki je pred tem na trgu imela 25-odstotni delež.
Despite the competition from Chinese DCD and price fluctuation between 2002 and the end of the IP, the CI managed to increase its average unit sales prices to unrelated customers on the Community market by 2 % over the period considered.
Kljub konkurenci kitajskega DCD in nihanju cen med letom 2002 in OP je industriji Skupnosti med obravnavanim obdobjem uspelo povečati povprečno prodajno ceno na enoto nepovezanim strankam na trgu Skupnosti za 2 %.
It should be noted, however, that these prices also include micro DCD, for which there is no competition from the Chinese exporting producers and for which higher prices can be obtained.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da te cene vključujejo tudi mikro DCD, ki nima konkurence kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in je zanj mogoče doseči višjo ceno.
Sales price in the EC (Index)
Prodajna cena v ES (indeks)
During the period considered the profitability of the CI was always negative.
Med obravnavanim obdobjem je bila dobičkonosnost industrije Skupnosti vedno negativna.
Losses peaked in the IP when they were in the range of – 20 % to – 30 %.
Izgube so bile najvišje v OP, ko so se gibale med – 20 in – 30 %.
According to the CI, the reference year, 2002, has to be considered exceptional due to the particular market situation following ODDA’s closure.
Industrija Skupnosti trdi, da je treba leto 2002 zaradi posebnega stanja na trgu po zaprtju ODDA šteti za izjemno.
In 2003 the CI managed to reduce its losses despite the fact that imports from the PRC reached their peak.
Industrija Skupnosti je leta 2003 uspela zmanjšati svoje izgube kljub temu, da je uvoz iz LRK dosegel najvišjo raven.
20 % to – 30 %– anaged to reduce its losses despite the fact that imports from the PRC reached their peak.
20 % do – 30 %– osti je leta 2003 uspela zmanjšati svoje izgube kljub temu, da je uvoz iz LRK dosegel najvišjo raven.
10 % to – 20 %– anaged to reduce its losses despite the fact that imports from the PRC reached their peak.
10 % do – 20 %– osti je leta 2003 uspela zmanjšati svoje izgube kljub temu, da je uvoz iz LRK dosegel najvišjo raven.