natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
One user has submitted that the alleged injury of the Community industry caused by decreasing prices was mainly attributable to the aggressive pricing policy operated by some European producers selling at prices below the Chinese import prices.
En uporabnik je navedel, da je mogoče domnevno škodo industrije Skupnosti, ki je bila posledica nižjih cen, predvsem pripisati agresivni cenovni politiki nekaterih evropskih proizvajalcev, ki so prodajali po cenah, nižjih od kitajskih uvoznih cen.
However, the investigation has not shown evidence of a general ‘aggressive pricing policy’ between certain European producers.
Vendar pa preiskava ni dala dokazov o splošni „agresivni cenovni politiki“ nekaterih evropskih proizvajalcev.
It was found that competition between the European producers mainly takes place in the regional markets and not on a Community-wide level, since due to considerable transport costs the producers usually sell in their geographic proximity.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da konkurenca med evropskimi proizvajalci poteka predvsem na regionalnih trgih in ne na ravni Skupnosti, saj proizvajalci zaradi znatnih stroškov prevoza izdelek ponavadi prodajajo v geografski bližini.
Lower prices possibly charged by some producers have thus not caused injury to other European producers.
Morebitne nižje cene nekaterih proizvajalcev torej niso povzročile škode drugim evropskim proizvajalcem.
Moreover, the fact that there is competition between certain European producers does not mean that the Chinese dumped import prices have not forced those producers to outbid each other even more than they would do in a situation of fair competition by the Chinese producers, and thus to sell at unsustainable prices.
Še več, obstoj konkurence med nekaterimi evropskimi proizvajalci ne pomeni, da kitajske dampinške uvozne cene teh proizvajalcev niso prisilile v ugodnejše ponudbe od tistih, ki bi jih dosegli v primeru poštene konkurence s strani kitajskih proizvajalcev, in v prodajo po neustreznih cenah.
This user has also argued that the biggest share of increase in consumption from 2003 to the IP was taken by the Community producers and not by the Chinese imports.
Ta uporabnik je navedel tudi, da gre največji delež povečanja potrošnje od leta 2003 do OP pripisati proizvajalcem Skupnosti in ne kitajskemu uvozu.
While this might be true in absolute terms, it is not so in relative terms: the investigation has shown that the Chinese imports, which had a 24 % market share in 2003, took almost half of the increase in the consumption from 2003 to the IP.
Čeprav je temu lahko tako v absolutnem smislu, pa je stanje v relativnem smislu drugačno: preiskava je pokazala, da je kitajski uvoz, ki je v letu 2003 imel 24-odstotni tržni delež, odgovoren za skoraj polovično rast potrošnje od leta 2003 do OP.
The same user also asserted that in an environment of growing consumption, the Community industry was unable to increase its market share because it did not increase its production capacity.
Isti uporabnik je tudi trdil, da industrija v okolju naraščajoče potrošnje svojega tržnega deleža ni bila zmožna povečati zato, ker ni povečala proizvodnih zmogljivosti.
Therefore, the increase in Community consumption had to be met by Chinese imports.
Zato je moral povečanju potrošnje v Skupnosti zadostiti kitajski uvoz.
However, the fact that the Community industry did not increase its capacity in pace with the growing consumption can be seen rather as a consequence of the uncertain investment environment created by the price pressure from the dumped Chinese imports than a cause for injury for the Community industry.
Vendar pa je mogoče dejstvo, da industrija Skupnosti svojih zmogljivosti ni uspela povečati v skladu z naraščajočo potrošnjo, obravnavati kot posledico negotovega naložbenega okolja, ki ga je ustvaril pritisk na cene dampinškega kitajskega uvoza, in ne kot vzrok za škodo industrije Skupnosti.
It is noted that the Community industry had about 120000 tonnes spare capacity during the IP, the utilisation of which was not economically viable due to the price pressure from the dumped Chinese imports.
Ugotovi se, da je imela industrija Skupnosti v OP okoli 120000 ton prostih zmogljivosti, katerih uporaba pa zaradi pritiska na cene dampinškega kitajskega uvoza ni bila ekonomsko izvedljiva.
Furthermore, one Community producer cut down its production significantly from 2005 to the IP and has post-IP ceased the production of Coke 80+.
Poleg tega je en proizvajalec Skupnosti proizvodnjo med letom 2005 in OP znatno zmanjšal in po OP prenehal s proizvodnjo koksa 80+.
The specific nature of this industry means that temporary shutting down of the production process destroys the production equipment (ovens) and restarting would require large additional investments.
Posebna narava te industrije pomeni, da začasna ukinitev proizvodnega procesa uniči proizvodno opremo (peči), ponovni zagon pa bi zahteval ogromne dodatne naložbe.
In a market situation characterised by a significant price depression it did not make economic sense to invest in restarting closed-down ovens or building new ones.
V razmerah na trgu, za katere je bilo značilno bistveno znižanje cen, z ekonomskega vidika ni bilo smiselno investirati v ponovni zagon ugasnjenih peči ali gradnjo novih peči.
One interested party also claimed that increased labour costs were a major cause of the alleged injury to the Community industry.
Ena zainteresirana stranka je tudi navedla, da so bili pomemben razlog za domnevno škodo industrije Skupnosti tudi višji stroški dela.
However, the investigation has shown that the overall increase in number of Community industry employees is attributable only to one producer, which in parallel increased its productivity.
Vendar pa je preiskava pokazala, da gre splošno povečanje števila zaposlenih v industriji Skupnosti pripisati le enemu proizvajalcu, ki pa je povečal tudi svojo produktivnost.
The other Community industry producers kept their level of employment fairly stable although facing decreasing production.
Drugi proizvajalci industrije Skupnosti so zaposlenost ohranjali na stabilni ravni, čeprav so se soočali z manjšo proizvodnjo.
This can be explained by the nature of the production process of this industry, where the personnel needed to keep the production facility running remains practically unchanged, regardless of whether the company is operating on full capacity or less, causing productivity to decrease in line with the production.
To lahko pojasnimo z naravo proizvodnega procesa v tej industriji, kjer se število zaposlenih, potrebnih za ohranjanje obratovanja proizvodnih zmogljivosti, ne spremeni, ne glede na to, ali podjetje obratuje s polno ali manjšo zmogljivostjo, kar pa povzroči manjšo produktivnost glede na proizvodnjo.
In any case, even if some Community industry producers have incurred unnecessarily high labour costs when decreasing production, this cannot be a significant cause of injury, given the minimal effect the changes in labour costs have had on the overall profitability of the Community industry.
V vsakem primeru tudi morebitni nepotrebno višji stroški dela nekaterih proizvajalcev industrije Skupnosti ob manjši proizvodnji ne morejo biti pomemben vzrok škode, in sicer zaradi minimalnega učinka, ki so ga spremembe v stroških dela imele na celotno dobičkonosnost industrije Skupnosti.
By way of illustration, the increase in labour costs (EUR 1,8 million) explains less than one percentage point loss of the Community industry’s overall profitability, which plummeted from 16,2 % to – 3,8 % from 2005 to the IP (around EUR 39 million reduction in profits).
Če ponazorimo, je povečanje stroškov dela (1,8 mio EUR) vzrok za manj kot 1 odstotno točko izgube skupne dobičkonosnosti industrije Skupnosti, ki se je s 16,2 % v letu 2005 zmanjšala na – 3,8 % v OP (za okoli 39 mio EUR manjši dobiček).
Prices of raw materials; natural disadvantages in terms of access to raw materials
Cene surovin; naravna prikrajšanost v smislu dostopa do surovin
With regard to prices of raw material as further described in recital 75 of the provisional Regulation, it is noted that revised calculations have shown that during the period considered, the basic raw material used in the production of Coke 80+, coking coal, represented around 60 % of the Community industry’s cost of manufacturing of Coke 80+.
V zvezi s cenami surovin, kot je podrobneje opisano v uvodni izjavi 75 začasne uredbe, se ugotovi, da so revidirani izračuni pokazali, da je v obravnavanem obdobju osnovna surovina, ki se uporablja pri proizvodnji koksa 80+, tj. koksni premog, predstavljala okoli 60 % stroškov za proizvodnjo koksa 80+.
One interested party argued that the increased costs of the main raw material, coking coal, hit the Community industry relatively harder than the Chinese industry due to the latter’s easy access to the raw material, thus making the Community industry uncompetitive even in the absence of dumped imports.
Ena zainteresirana stranka je navedla, da so povečani stroški glavne surovine, koksnega premoga, na industrijo Skupnosti bolj vplivali kot na kitajsko industrijo, saj ima Kitajska lažji dostop do surovin, zaradi česar je industrija Skupnosti celo brez dampinškega uvoza nekonkurenčna.
In this regard, it is firstly noted that in view of the very limited cooperation from Chinese exporting producers, no general conclusions can be drawn as to the facility of access to raw materials by Chinese exporting producers.
V zvezi s tem se najprej ugotovi, da zaradi omejenega sodelovanja kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ni mogoče priti do sklepnih ugotovitev v zvezi z dostopom teh do surovin.
It must also be noted that one Community industry producer, which accounts for a significant portion of the total Community industry production, uses locally sourced coking coal.
Treba je tudi navesti, da eden izmed proizvajalcev industrije Skupnosti, ki ima velik del celotne proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti, uporablja koksni premog, ki ga pridobiva v svoji okolici.
In addition, as was already noted in recital 76 of the provisional Regulation, up to the IP the Community industry was able to pass on the increase in raw material prices to the sales prices.
Poleg tega pa, kot je navedeno že v uvodni izjavi 76 začasne uredbe, bi lahko industrija Skupnosti do OP zvišanje cen surovin prenesla na prodajne cene.
Additionally, it is noted that according to available market information, also China is partly resorting to imported raw materials, currently importing significant quantities of coking coal from Australia.
Ugotovi se še, da se po razpoložljivih informacijah na trgu tudi Kitajska delno zateka k uvoženim surovinam, saj trenutno velike količine koksnega premoga uvaža iz Avstralije.
Another interested party implied that the causation analysis is incorrect, since it doubts how the Community industry, which was profitable in 2003, could have suffered losses during the IP and no longer be able to cover the high cost of raw materials, even though the increase of Community industry’s sales prices between 2003 and the IP was far more significant than the impact of the increase in raw material prices.
Druga zainteresirana stranka je navedla, da je analiza vzročne zveze napačna, saj dvomi v to, kako je industrija Skupnosti, ki je bila leta 2003 dobičkonosna, lahko v OP utrpela izgubo in ni bila več sposobna pokrivati visokih stroškov surovin, pa čeprav je bilo povečanje prodajnih cen industrije Skupnosti med letom 2003 in OP precej večje od vpliva povečanja cen surovin.
In this regard it is noted that while it is true that the sales prices of the Community industry were higher during the IP than in 2003 (see recital 51 of the provisional Regulation), the raw material prices, which are the main component of the cost of production, were proportionally even higher (see recital 75 of the provisional Regulation as well as recital 41 above).
V zvezi s tem se ugotovi, da so bile prodajne cene industrije Skupnosti v OP sicer res višje (glej uvodno izjavo 51 začasne uredbe), a so bile cene surovin, ki so glavni sestavni del stroška proizvodnje, sorazmerno gledano še višje (glej uvodno izjavo 75 začasne uredbe in tudi uvodno izjavo 41).
The claim is therefore rejected.
Argument je torej zavrnjen.
In the absence of any further new and substantiated information or argument, recitals 67 to 80 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed, with the exception of the revisions made to recitals 67 and 75 as stated above.
Ker ni drugih novih in utemeljenih informacij ali argumentov, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 67 do 80 začasne uredbe, razen revizij uvodnih izjav 67 in 75, kot je navedeno zgoraj.
In the light of the above, the provisional finding of existence of causal link between the material injury suffered by the Community industry and the dumped Chinese imports is confirmed.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega se začasne ugotovitve obstoja vzročne zveze med znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, in dampinškim kitajskim uvozom potrdijo.
Developments after the investigation period
Dogodki po obdobju preiskave
Comments relating to the need to take into consideration certain important post-IP developments have been received both from certain Community industry producers as well as from the cooperating exporting producer and users.
Pripombe v zvezi s potrebo po upoštevanju nekaterih pomembnih dogodkov po OP so poslali nekateri proizvajalci industrije Skupnosti in sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki in uporabniki.
These comments relate in particular to significant increases of the market price of Coke 80+, as regards the price of Chinese imports as well as the Community industry’s sales prices.
Te pripombe se nanašajo zlasti na znatno zvišanje tržne cene koksa 80+, in sicer v zvezi s cenami kitajskega uvoza in tudi prodajnimi cenami industrije Skupnosti.
The said interested parties have attributed the increase of import prices mainly to certain measures put recently in place by the Chinese Government to discourage the export of energy-intensive materials, including coke, such as an export tax hike and restrictive distribution of export licenses.
Omenjene zainteresirane stranke so višje uvozne cene pripisale predvsem nekaterim ukrepom, ki jih je v zadnjem času kitajska vlada uvedla z namenom zmanjšanja izvoza energetsko intenzivnih materialov, vključno s koksom. Ti ukrepi zajemajo povečanje izvoznih dajatev in restriktivno razdeljevanje izvoznih dovoljenj.
One user has argued that those measures are likely to be long-lasting in view of the structural changes in Chinese policy, whereby semi-raw energy goods such as Coke 80+ are retained for domestic market to generate locally sourced added value.
En uporabnik je navedel, da bodo ti ukrepi verjetno dolgotrajni, in sicer zaradi strukturnih sprememb v kitajski politiki, pri čemer se polsurovi energetski izdelki, kot je koks 80+, ohranijo za domači trg, da ustvarijo lokalno dodano vrednost.
Community industry producers have, on the other hand, asserted that the current high price level is temporary and subject to changes at any time at the sole discretion of the PRC Government.
Po drugi strani so proizvajalci industrije Skupnosti izjavili, da so trenutne cene začasne in predmet sprememb, do katerih lahko pride kadar koli po izključni presoji vlade LRK.
The same user has also claimed that the profitability of the Community producers is currently at high levels due to significantly increased sales prices after the investigation period.
Isti uporabnik je navedel tudi, da je trenutna dobičkonosnost proizvajalcev Skupnosti visoka, in sicer zaradi znatno višjih prodajnih cen po obdobju preiskave.
According to this user, the sales prices of the Community industry are set for a long-term upward trend due to significant increase in consumption in the stone wool industry, absence of any increases in production capacity in the EU and, especially, dramatic changes in Chinese policy having significantly reduced exports from the PRC.
Po besedah tega uporabnika so prodajne cene industrije Skupnosti določene za dolgoročni naraščajoči trend zaradi znatnega povečanja potrošnje v industriji kamene volne, neobstoja povečanja proizvodnih zmogljivosti v EU in še zlasti zaradi dramatičnih sprememb v kitajski politiki, saj je Kitajska zelo zmanjšala izvoz.
Insofar as this user implied that the alleged longevity of (i) the restricted Chinese exports and (ii) the allegedly high level of profitability of the Community industry negates the justification of imposing anti-dumping measures, it is noted firstly that while it is true that the Chinese Government has put in place measures that discourage the export of energy-intensive materials, no information is available to draw conclusions on the permanence of these measures.
Ta uporabnik je navedel, da domnevna dolgotrajnost (i) omejenega izvoza iz Kitajske in (ii) domnevne visoke ravni dobičkonosnosti industrije Skupnosti oporeka upravičenosti uvedbe protidampinških ukrepov ter se najprej ugotovi, da je kitajska vlada sicer res uvedla ukrepe za zmanjšanje izvoza energetsko intenzivnih materialov, a na voljo ni informacij, na podlagi katerih bi bilo mogoče sklepati o trajanju teh ukrepov.
On the contrary, experience gathered in the past, notably in 2004 and 2005, showed that the policy to influence exports could be reversed rather quickly.
Nasprotno pa so izkušnje iz preteklosti, predvsem v letih 2004 in 2005, pokazale, da je mogoče politiko glede izvoza zelo hitro spremeniti.
Secondly, in accordance with Article 6(1) of the basic Regulation, information concerning dumping and injury relating to a period subsequent to the investigation period shall, normally, not be taken into account.
Drugič, v skladu s členom 6(1) osnovne uredbe se informacije v zvezi z dampingom in škodo, povezane z obdobjem po obdobju preiskave, običajno ne upoštevajo.
Significant increases observed in the prices of Chinese imports of Coke 80+ have, however, been acknowledged in recital 112 of the provisional Regulation and have been taken into account in the choice of minimum import price (MIP) as the form of the measure.
Znatno povečanje cen kitajskega uvoza koksa 80+ je bilo navedeno v uvodni izjavi 112 začasne uredbe in je bilo upoštevano pri izbiri minimalne uvozne cene („MIP“) kot oblike ukrepa.
The continuing trend of high import prices beyond injurious levels also after the provisional Regulation is confirmed by published market reports as well by information available to the Commission concerning imports of Coke 80+ from the PRC carried out after the imposition of the provisional measures.
Trend visokih uvoznih cen preko škodljivih ravni tudi po potrditvi začasne uredbe z objavljenimi tržnimi poročili in Komisiji razpoložljivimi informacijam v zvezi z uvozom koksa 80+ iz LRK se je po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov nadaljeval.
This circumstance is again reflected in the choice of the proposed definitive measure, a minimum import price, as set out in recital 75.
Ta okoliščina je spet razvidna iz izbire predlaganega dokončnega ukrepa, minimalne uvozne cene, kot je določeno v uvodni izjavi 75 v nadaljevanju.
Certain Community industry producers have claimed that the high import price levels observed after the IP were attributable also to the ocean freight rates for bulk carriage, which increased significantly after the IP, inflating the cif price of the product concerned.
Nekateri proizvajalci industrije Skupnosti so navedli, da gre visoke uvozne cene, opažene po OP, pripisati tudi ladijskim prevoznim stroškom za razsuti tovor, ki so se po OP znatno povišali, kar je zvišalo ceno CIF zadevnega izdelka.
They argued that since the minimum import price is determined on a cif basis, it does not address the issue of imports at dumped prices, as the import prices meet the MIP when they include the ocean freight.
Navedli so, da ker je minimalna izvozna cena določena na osnovi CIF, to ne obravnava vprašanja uvoza po dampinški ceni, saj uvozne cene izpolnijo MIP, ko vključujejo ladijski prevoz.
In this regard, it is noted firstly that in accordance with Article 6(1) of the basic Regulation, post-IP information concerning dumping shall, normally, not be taken into account.
V zvezi s tem se najprej ugotovi, da se v skladu s členom 6(1) osnovne uredbe informacije po OP v zvezi z dampingom običajno ne upoštevajo.
In addition, the said Community industry producers have even failed to elaborate how the alleged ocean freight rate increases should, in their view, be taken into account in this regard.
Poleg tega proizvajalci industrije Skupnosti niso pojasnili, kako naj bi se domnevno povečanje prevoznih stroškov po njihovem mnenju upoštevalo v tej zvezi.
The said Community industry producers have also argued that a MIP based on the cost of raw material during the IP fails to adequately remove the injury caused by the dumped imports, since a significant increase in ocean freight rates after the IP would affect the cost of the principal raw material, the coking coal, which is mainly sourced overseas by the Community industry.
Omenjeni proizvajalci industrije Skupnosti so tudi navedli, da MIP, ki temelji na strošku surovin v OP, ustrezno ne odstrani škode, ki jo je povzročil dampinški uvoz, saj bi znatno povišanje ladijskih prevoznih stroškov po OP vplivalo na stroške najpomembnejše surovine, koksnega premoga, ki ga industrija Skupnosti večinoma uvaža iz čezmorskih držav.
In this regard, it is again reiterated that in accordance with Article 6(1) of the basic Regulation, post-IP information shall, normally, not be taken into account.
V zvezi s tem je treba ponoviti, da se v skladu s členom 6(1) osnovne uredbe informacije po OP v zvezi z dampingom običajno ne upoštevajo.
In addition, the Community industry producers have not quantified the effect the alleged increase of ocean freight rates would have on the Community industry’s cost of production of Coke 80+, except for providing some published market reports on ocean freight rates.
Poleg tega proizvajalci industrije Skupnosti niso kvantificirali učinka, ki bi ga domnevno povišanje ladijskega prevoza imelo na stroške proizvodnje koksa 80+ za industrijo Skupnosti, predložili so le nekaj objavljenih tržnih poročil o ladijskih prevoznih stroških.
These do not, however, allow making sufficiently detailed calculations on the impact for the Community industry as a whole, taking into account in particular that the Community industry producers acquire their raw material from several different sources and since one of the major Community industry producers would not be affected by the ocean freight increases, since it uses locally sourced raw material.
Ta pa ne omogočajo dovolj podrobnih izračunov glede vpliva za industrijo Skupnosti kot celoto, ob upoštevanju zlasti, da proizvajalci industrije Skupnosti surovine pridobivajo iz več različnih virov, eden izmed večjih proizvajalcev industrije Skupnosti pa povečanja cen ladijskega prevoza ne bi občutil, saj uporablja surovine v svoji bližini.
The argument of the Community industry producers must thus be rejected.
Zato je treba argument proizvajalcev industrije Skupnosti zavrniti.
In addition to the comments related to post-IP developments addressed in recitals 47 to 50, one user also claimed that the analysis of the interest of the Community industry for the imposition of measures rests exclusively on the findings relating to the IP, without reflecting the entire injury investigation period.
Poleg pripomb v zvezi z dogodki po OP, obravnavanimi v uvodnih izjavah 47 do 50, je en uporabnik tudi navedel, da analiza interesa industrije Skupnosti za uvedbo ukrepov sloni izključno na ugotovitvah v zvezi z OP, brez upoštevanja celotnega obdobja preiskave v zvezi s škodo.
In this regard, it is noted that the analysis of possible consequences for the Community industry of imposing anti-dumping measures or not imposing them is deduced from the injury analysis, which the Commission has, as elaborated in recitals 28 and 29, conducted regarding the development of injury indicators over the whole period considered.
V zvezi s tem se ugotovi, da analiza možnih posledic za industrijo Skupnosti v primeru uvedbe protidampinških ukrepov ali njihove neuvedbe izhaja iz analize škode, ki jo je Komisija, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 28 in 29, izvedla v zvezi z razvojem kazalnikov škode v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju.