natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Due to the hydrographical situation and the structure of the carp aquaculture in the main carp producing Member States, the costs related to measures to eradicate that disease would be disproportionate to the economic losses caused by the disease.
Zaradi hidrografskega položaja in strukture ribogojstva krapov v glavnih državah članicah proizvajalkah krapov, bi bili stroški v zvezi z ukrepi za izkoreninjenje navedene bolezni nesorazmerni z gospodarskimi izgubami, ki jih bolezen povzroča.
On the basis of the recent information received, SVC appears not to meet all the criteria for inclusion in the list of non-exotic diseases in Part II of Annex IV to Directive 2006/88/EC.
Na podlagi zadnjih pridobljenih informacij se zdi, da SVC ne izpolnjuje vseh meril za uvrstitev v seznam neeksotičnih bolezni iz dela II Priloge IV k Direktivi 2006/88/ES.
Consequently, it is appropriate to delete SVC from the list of non-exotic diseases in Part II of Annex IV to Directive 2006/88/EC.
Zato je primerno, da se SVC črta s seznama neeksotičnih bolezni iz dela II Priloge IV k Direktivi 2006/88/ES.
Article 43 of Directive 2006/88/EC provides that Member States may take measures to prevent the introduction of, or to control, diseases not listed in Part II of Annex IV thereto, where those diseases constitute a significant risk for the animal health situation of aquaculture or wild aquatic animals in those Member States.
Člen 43 Direktive 2006/88/ES določa, da lahko države članice sprejmejo ukrepe za preprečitev vnosa bolezni, ki niso naštete v delu II Priloge IV k Direktivi ali za nadzor nad njimi, če navedene bolezni povzročajo znatno tveganje za zdravje živali ribogojstva ali prosto živečih vodnih živali v navedenih državah članicah.
Those measures are not to exceed the limits of what is appropriate and necessary to prevent the introduction of, or control of, such diseases.
Navedeni ukrepi ne smejo preseči mej primernega in potrebnega za preprečitev vnosa takih bolezni ali nadzora nad njimi.
Pursuant to Article 63 of Directive 2006/88/EC, Commission Decision 2004/453/EC of 29 April 2004 implementing Council Directive 91/67/EEC as regards measures against certain diseases in aquaculture animals [2] is to continue to apply for the purposes of Directive 2006/88/EC pending the adoption of the necessary provisions in accordance with Article 43 of that Directive, which are to be adopted no later than three years after entry into force of the Directive.
V skladu s členom 63 Direktive 2006/88/ES je treba Odločbo Komisije 2004/453/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o izvajanju Direktive Sveta 91/67/EGS v zvezi z ukrepi proti nekaterim boleznim akvakultur [2] še naprej uporabljati za namene Direktive 2006/88/ES do sprejetja potrebnih določb v skladu s členom 43 navedene direktive, ki jih je treba sprejeti najpozneje tri leta po začetku veljavnosti Direktive.
Under Commission Decision 2004/453/EC, Denmark, Ireland, Finland, Sweden and United Kingdom have their whole territory or parts thereof approved as SVC-free or under control and eradication programmes.
Na podlagi Odločbe 2004/453/ES so celotna ozemlja Danske, Irske, Finske, Švedske in Združenega kraljestva ali njihovi deli odobreni kot prosti SVC ali pod nadzorom in v programih za izkoreninjenje.
Those Member States may consequently require additional guarantees for the introduction into those territories of species susceptible to SVC.
Zato lahko navedene države članice zahtevajo dodatna jamstva za vnos vrst, dovzetnih za bolezen, na navedena ozemlja.
The Member States that may require additional guarantees in place in accordance with Decision 2004/453/EC should be allowed to continue to apply measures in accordance with Article 43 of Directive 2006/88/EC, including restrictions on the placing on the market and imports, in order to control SVC and maintain their disease-free status.
Državam članicam, ki lahko zahtevajo dodatna jamstva, je treba v skladu z Odločbo 2004/453/ES dovoliti, da še naprej uporabljajo ukrepe v skladu s členom 43 Direktive 2006/88/ES, vključno z omejitvami dajanja na trg in uvoza, da bi nadzorovale SVC ter ohranile svoj status brez bolezni.
Annex IV to Directive 2006/88/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Prilogo IV k Direktivi 2006/88/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Directive 2006/88/EC provides that the Member States are to adopt national measures complying with that Directive by 1 May 2008 and apply the national provisions by 1 August 2008.
Direktiva 2006/88/ES določa, da morajo države članice do 1. maja 2008 sprejeti nacionalne ukrepe, ki izpolnjujejo zahteve navedene direktive in do 1. avgusta 2008 uporabljati nacionalne predpise.
In order to give Member States sufficient time, the national measures complying with Directive 2006/88/EC, as amended by the present Directive, should be adopted by 1 August 2008, and the national provisions applied from 1 August 2008.
Da bi imele države članice dovolj časa, je treba do 1. avgusta 2008 sprejeti nacionalne ukrepe, ki izpolnjujejo zahteve iz Direktive 2006/88/ES, kakor je spremenjena s to direktivo, nacionalne predpise pa uporabljati od 1. avgusta 2008.
Annex IV to Directive 2006/88/EC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Directive.
Priloga IV k Direktivi 2006/88/ES se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej direktivi.
Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1 August 2008 at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive.
Države članice sprejmejo in objavijo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do 1. avgusta 2008.
OJ L 156, 30.4.2004, p. 5; as corrected by OJ L 202, 7.6.2004, p. 4.
UL L 156, 30.4.2004, str. 5.
Decision as amended by Decision 2006/272/EC (OJ L 99, 7.4.2006, p. 31).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2006/272/ES (UL L 99, 7.4.2006, str. 31).
Part II to Annex IV is replaced by the following:
Del II Priloge IV se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Genera: Catla, Channa, Labeo, Mastacembelus, Mugil, Puntius and Trichogaster
rodovi: Catla, Channa, Labeo, Mastacembelus, Mugil, Puntius in Trichogaster
DISEASES
BOLEZNI
Chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta), coho salmon (O. kisutch), Masou salmon (O. masou), rainbow or steelhead trout (O. mykiss), sockeye salmon (O. nerka), pink salmon (O. rhodurus) chinook salmon (O.tshawytscha), and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)
vrste lososov (Oncorhynchus keta, O. kisutch, O. masou, O. nerka, O. rhodurus in O. tshawytscha), šarenka/amerikanka (O. mykiss) ter atlantski losos (Salmo salar)
Common carp and koi carp (Cyprinus carpio)
navadni krap in koi krap (Cyprinus carpio)
Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), and brown and sea trout (S. trutta)
šarenka/amerikanka (Oncorhynchus mykiss), atlantski losos (Salmo salar)in morska postrv (Salmo trutta)
Australian mud oyster (Ostrea angasi), Chilean flat oyster (O. chilensis), Olympia flat oyster (O. conchaphila), Asiatic oyster (O. denselammellosa), European flat oyster (O. edulis), and Argentinian oyster (O. puelchana)
ostrige (O. angasi, O. chilensis, O. conchaphila, O. denselammellosa, O. edulis, O. puelchana)
All decapod crustaceans (order Decapoda)’
vsi raki deseteronožci (red Decapoda)“
Directive 2008/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2008/54/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Council Directive 95/50/EC on uniform procedures for checks on the transport of dangerous goods by road, as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission
o spremembi Direktive Sveta 95/50/ES o enotnih postopkih kontrol cestnega prevoza nevarnega blaga glede Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil
Council Directive 95/50/EC [3] provides that certain measures are to be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission [4].
Direktiva Sveta 95/50/ES [3] določa, da je treba nekatere ukrepe sprejeti v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil [4].
Decision 1999/468/EC has been amended by Decision 2006/512/EC, which introduced the regulatory procedure with scrutiny for the adoption of measures of general scope and designed to amend non-essential elements of a basic instrument adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty, inter alia, by deleting some of those elements or by supplementing the instrument with new non-essential elements.
Sklep 1999/468/ES je bil spremenjen s Sklepom 2006/512/ES, ki je uvedel regulativni postopek s pregledom za sprejemanje ukrepov splošnega obsega, namenjenih spreminjanju nebistvenih določb temeljnega akta, sprejetega v skladu s postopkom, določenim v členu 251 Pogodbe, med drugim s črtanjem nekaterih takih določb ali z njegovim dopolnjevanjem z novimi nebistvenimi določbami.
In accordance with the statement by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission [5] concerning Decision 2006/512/EC, for the regulatory procedure with scrutiny to be applicable to instruments adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty which are already in force, those instruments must be adjusted in accordance with the applicable procedures.
V skladu z Izjavo Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije [5] o Sklepu 2006/512/ES bi bilo treba že veljavne akte, sprejete v skladu s postopkom, določenim v členu 251 Pogodbe, prilagoditi v skladu z veljavnimi postopki, da bi se zanje uporabljal regulativni postopek s pregledom.
In particular the Commission should be empowered to adapt the Annexes to Directive 95/50/EC to scientific and technical progress.
Zlasti bi bilo treba Komisiji podeliti pooblastila za prilagoditev prilog k Direktivi 95/50/ES znanstvenemu in tehnološkemu napredku.
Since those measures are of general scope and are designed to amend non-essential elements of Directive 95/50/EC, they must be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC.
Ker so navedeni ukrepi splošnega obsega in so namenjeni spreminjanju nebistvenih določb Direktive 95/50/ES, jih je treba sprejeti v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 5a Sklepa 1999/468/ES.
Directive 95/50/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Direktivo 95/50/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Since the amendments made to Directive 95/50/EC by this Directive are technical in nature and concern committee procedure only, they do not need to be transposed by the Member States.
Ker so spremembe Direktive 95/50/ES s to direktivo tehnične narave in zadevajo le postopek v odboru, ni treba, da jih države članice prenesejo v nacionalno zakonodajo.
Article 9a and 9b of Directive 95/50/EC shall be replaced by the following:
Člena 9a in 9b Direktive 95/50/ES se nadomestita z naslednjim:
The Commission shall adapt the Annexes to scientific and technical progress in the fields covered by this Directive, in particular to take account of amendments to Directive 94/55/EC.
Komisija prilagodi priloge znanstvenemu in tehničnemu napredku na področjih, ki jih zajema ta direktiva, zlasti zaradi upoštevanja sprememb Direktive 94/55/ES.
Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 9b(2).
Ti ukrepi, namenjeni spreminjanju nebistvenih določb te direktive, se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 9b(2).
The Commission shall be assisted by the Committee on the Transport of Dangerous Goods set up by Article 9 of Directive 94/55/EC.
Komisiji pomaga Odbor za prevoz nevarnega blaga, ustanovljen s členom 9 Direktive 94/55/ES.
OJ C 44, 16.2.2008, p. 52.
UL C 44, 16.2.2008, str. 52.
Opinion of the European Parliament of 15 January 2008 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and Council Decision of 14 May 2008.
Mnenje Evropskega parlamenta z dne 15. januarja 2008 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in Sklep Sveta z dne 14. maja 2008.
Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2004/112/EC (OJ L 367, 14.12.2004, p. 23).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Komisije 2004/112/ES (UL L 367, 14.12.2004, str. 23).
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 653/2012 of 17 July 2012 initiating a ‘new exporter’ review of Council Regulation (EC) No 192/2007 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate originating, inter alia, in Taiwan, repealing the duty with regard to imports from one exporter in this country and making these imports subject to registration
Popravek Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 653/2012 z dne 17. julija 2012 o začetku pregleda v zvezi z novim izvoznikom Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 192/2007 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz polietilen tereftalata s poreklom, med drugim, s Tajvana, odpravi dajatev na uvoz od enega izvoznika iz te države in uvedbi registracije takšnega uvoza
(Official Journal of the European Union L 188 of 18 July 2012)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 188 z dne 18. julija 2012)
On page 8, recital 4, first sentence:
Stran 8, uvodna izjava 4, prvi stavek:
‘The measures currently in force are a definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 192/2007 (2) under which imports into the Union of the product under review originating in Taiwan, including the product produced by the applicant, are subject to a definitive anti-dumping duty of 143,4 % with the exception of two companies specially mentioned which are subject to individual duty rates.’,
„Trenutno veljavni ukrep je dokončna protidampinška dajatev, uvedena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 192/2007 (2), v skladu s katero velja za uvoz izdelka v pregledu s poreklom s Tajvana v Unijo, vključno z izdelkom, ki ga proizvaja vložnik, dokončna protidampinška dajatev v višini 143,4 %, razen za dve izrecno navedeni družbi, za kateri veljata individualni stopnji dajatev.“,
‘The measures currently in force are a definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 192/2007 (2) under which imports into the Union of the product under review originating in Taiwan, including the product produced by the applicant, are subject to a definitive anti-dumping duty of EUR 143,4/t with the exception of two companies specially mentioned which are subject to individual duty rates.’.
„Trenutno veljavni ukrep je dokončna protidampinška dajatev, uvedena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 192/2007 (2), v skladu s katero velja za uvoz izdelka v pregledu s poreklom s Tajvana v Unijo, vključno z izdelkom, ki ga proizvaja vložnik, dokončna protidampinška dajatev v višini 143,4 EUR/t, razen za dve izrecno navedeni družbi, za kateri veljata individualni stopnji dajatev.“
Council Directive 2008/55/EC
Direktiva Sveta 2008/55/ES
on mutual assistance for the recovery of claims relating to certain levies, duties, taxes and other measures
o vzajemni pomoči pri izterjavi terjatev za določene prelevmane, carine, davke in druge ukrepe
Council Directive 76/308/EEC of 15 March 1976 on mutual assistance for the recovery of claims relating to certain levies, duties, taxes and other measures [3] has been substantially amended several times [4].
Direktiva Sveta 76/308/EGS z dne 15. marca 1976 o vzajemni pomoči pri izterjavi terjatev za določene prelevmane, carine, davke in druge ukrepe [3] je bila večkrat [4] bistveno spremenjena.
The fact that national provisions relating to recovery are applicable only within national territories is in itself an obstacle to the functioning of the internal market.
Dejstvo, da se nacionalni predpisi o izterjavi uporabljajo samo na nacionalnih ozemljih, je ovira za delovanje notranjega trga.
This situation prevents Community rules from being fully and fairly applied, particularly in the area of the common agricultural policy, and facilitates fraudulent operations.
Ta položaj preprečuje, da bi se pravila Skupnosti v celoti in pravično uporabljala, zlasti na področju skupne kmetijske politike, in omogoča goljufije.
It is necessary to meet the threat to the financial interests of the Community and the Member States and to the internal market posed by the development of fraud so as to safeguard better the competitiveness and fiscal neutrality of the internal market.
Na grožnje finančnim interesom Skupnosti in držav članic ter na grožnje notranjemu trgu bi se bilo treba odzvati na način, ki bi bolje zagotavljal konkurenčnost in fiskalno nevtralnost notranjega trga.
It is therefore necessary to adopt common rules on mutual assistance for recovery.
Zato bi bilo treba sprejeti skupna pravila o vzajemni pomoči pri izterjavi.
These rules should apply to the recovery of claims resulting from the various measures which form part of the system of total or partial financing of the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, to the recovery of levies and other duties and import and export duties, valued added tax and harmonised excise duties (manufactured tobacco, alcohol and alcoholic beverages and mineral oils), as well as of taxes on income, on capital and on insurance premiums.
Ta pravila bi se morala uporabljati za izterjavo terjatev, ki izvirajo iz različnih ukrepov, ki so v celoti ali deloma del sistema financiranja iz Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada in Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja, za izterjavo prelevmanov, uvoznih in izvoznih dajatev, davka na dodano vrednost in usklajenih trošarin (tobačni izdelki, alkohol in alkoholne pijače ter mineralna olja), kakor tudi za davke na dohodek in kapital ter za davke na zavarovalne premije.
They should also apply to the recovery of interest, administrative penalties and fines, with the exclusion of any sanction of a criminal nature, and costs incidental to such claims.
Uporabljati bi se morala tudi za izterjavo obresti, upravnih denarnih kazni in glob, z izjemo vseh sankcij kazenskega značaja, ter za stroške, ki so povezani s temi terjatvami.
Mutual assistance should consist of the following: the requested authority should on the one hand supply the applicant authority with the information which the latter needs in order to recover claims arising in the Member State in which it is situated and notify the debtor of all instruments relating to such claims emanating from that Member State, and on the other hand it should recover, at the request of the applicant authority, the claims arising in the Member State in which the latter is situated.
Vzajemna pomoč bi morala obsegati naslednje: zaprošeni organ bi moral organu prosilcu dati vse informacije, ki jih ta potrebuje za izterjavo terjatev, nastalih v državi članici, v kateri ima sedež, in obvestiti dolžnika o vseh aktih v zvezi s terjatvami, ki izvirajo iz te države članice, po drugi strani pa bi moral na zahtevo organa prosilca izterjati terjatve, nastale v državi članici, v kateri ima sedež.
These different forms of assistance should be afforded by the requested authority in compliance with the laws, regulations and administrative provisions governing such matters in the Member State in which it is situated.
Zaprošeni organ bi moral te različne oblike pomoči zagotavljati v skladu z zakoni in drugimi predpisi, ki urejajo ta vprašanja v državi članici, v kateri ima sedež.
It is necessary to lay down the conditions in accordance with which requests for assistance must be drawn up by the applicant authority and to give a limitative definition of the particular circumstances in which the requested authority may refuse assistance in any given case.
Treba bi bilo določiti pogoje, v skladu s katerimi organ prosilec sestavi zaprosilo za pomoč, in podati omejevalno opredelitev posebnih okoliščin, v katerih lahko zaprošeni organ v danem primeru pomoč zavrne.
In order to permit more efficient and effective recovery of claims in respect of which a request for recovery has been made, the instrument permitting enforcement of the claim should, in principle, be treated as an instrument of the Member State in which the requested authority is situated.
Z namenom, da se omogoči bolj uspešna in učinkovitejša izterjava terjatev, na katere se nanaša zaprosilo za izterjavo, bi bilo treba izvršilni naslov načeloma obravnavati kot akt države članice, kjer je sedež zaprošenega organa.
When the requested authority is required to act on behalf of the applicant authority to recover a claim, it should be able, if the provisions in force in the Member State in which it is situated so permit and with the agreement of the applicant authority, to allow the debtor time to pay or authorise payment by instalment.
Zaprošeni organ bi moral imeti možnost, da takrat, ko v imenu organa prosilca izterjuje terjatve in če veljavni predpisi v državi članici, v kateri ima sedež, to dopuščajo ter v soglasju z organom prosilcem, dolžniku določi rok za plačilo ali dovoli plačilo na obroke.
Any interest charged on such payment facilities should also be remitted to the Member State in which the applicant authority is situated.
V državo članico, kjer ima organ prosilec sedež, bi bilo treba nakazati tudi vse obresti, ki izhajajo iz takšnih plačilnih ugodnosti.
Upon a reasoned request from the applicant authority, the requested authority should also be able, in so far as the provisions in force in the Member State in which it is situated so permit, to take precautionary measures to guarantee the recovery of claims arising in the applicant Member State.
Zaprošeni organ bi moral imeti na podlagi obrazloženega zaprosila organa prosilca možnost, v kolikor veljavni predpisi države članice, v kateri ima sedež, to dovoljujejo, da sprejme ukrepe zavarovanja, s katerimi zajamči izterjavo terjatev, nastalih v državi članici prosilki.
Such claims should not necessarily benefit from the privileges accorded to similar claims arising in the Member State in which the requested authority is situated.
Ni nujno, da za takšne terjatve veljajo ugodnosti, ki veljajo za podobne terjatve, ki izvirajo iz države članice, v kateri ima zaprošeni organ sedež.
During the recovery procedure in the Member State in which the requested authority is situated the claim or the instrument authorising its enforcement issued in the Member State in which the applicant authority is situated may be contested by the person concerned.
Med postopkom izterjave v državi članici, v kateri ima zaprošeni organ sedež, lahko zainteresirana oseba izpodbija terjatev ali izvršilni naslov, izdan v državi članici, v kateri ima sedež organ prosilec.
It should be laid down in such cases that the person concerned must bring the action contesting the claim before the competent body of the Member State in which the applicant authority is situated and that the requested authority must suspend, unless the applicant authority requests otherwise, any enforcement proceedings which it has begun until a decision is taken by the aforementioned body.
Za ta primer bi bilo treba predvideti, da mora zainteresirana oseba sprožiti postopek za izpodbijanje pri pristojnem organu države članice, v kateri ima organ prosilec sedež, in da mora zaprošeni organ prekiniti začeti postopek izvršitve, razen če organ prosilec zahteva drugače, dokler omenjeni organ ne odloči o zadevi.
It should be laid down that documents and information communicated in the course of mutual assistance for recovery may not be used for other purposes.
Treba bi bilo določiti, da se dokumentov in informacij, sporočenih v okviru vzajemne pomoči pri izterjavi, ne bi smelo uporabljati v druge namene.
The use of mutual assistance for recovery cannot, save in exceptional circumstances, be based on financial benefits or an interest in the results obtained, but Member States should be able to agree the reimbursement arrangements when recovery poses a specific problem.
Uporaba vzajemne pomoči pri izterjavi ne bi smela temeljiti, razen v izjemnih okoliščinah, na finančnih ugodnostih ali interesu za dosežene rezultate, države članice pa bi morale biti sposobne opredeliti podrobna pravila za povračila, kadar izterjava predstavlja posebne probleme.