natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In reply to this, it should be noted that, for sales of the product concerned to the Community, the sole Ukrainian exporting producer consigned the product concerned directly to the Community, invoiced its related company in Switzerland for each consignment and received a relevant payment.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je za prodajo zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost edini ukrajinski proizvajalec izvoznik, ki je zadevni izdelek poslal neposredno v Skupnost, za vsako pošiljko izdal svoji povezani družbi v Švici fakturo in zanjo prejel ustrezno plačilo.
Thus, the exporting producer performed all functions of an exporter.
Tako je proizvajalec izvoznik izvajal vse dejavnosti izvoznika.
The related company in Switzerland negotiated sales contracts and invoiced the first independent buyer in the Community.
Povezana družba v Švici se je pogajala o prodajnih pogodbah in izdala fakturo prvemu neodvisnemu kupcu v Skupnosti.
The related company also performed all import functions in respect of the goods entering into free circulation in the Community, i.e. it undertook the customs clearing of the goods into the Community and incurred any costs for transporting the goods to the independent buyer in the Community as well as any warehousing in the Community where applicable.
Povezana družba je izvajala tudi vse ostale uvozne dejavnosti za blago, ki je bilo dano v prosti promet v Skupnosti, tj. prevzela je postopke carinjenja blaga, nastale transportne stroške za blago do neodvisnega kupca v Skupnosti, kakor tudi skladiščenje v Skupnosti, če je bilo potrebno.
In this respect, this related company, though formally established outside the Community, has an EU VAT number and operates, inter alia, through its sales offices and several warehousing facilities in the Community.
Ta povezana družba ima, čeprav formalno ustanovljena izven Skupnosti, EU DDV številko in deluje med drugim preko svojih prodajnih pisarn in skladišč v Skupnosti.
It should thus be considered as performing the functions of a related importer as set out in recital 59 of the provisional Regulation and not those of an exporter or a sales agent.
Zato jo je treba obravnavati kot družbo, ki je delovala kot povezani uvoznik v skladu z uvodno izjavo 59 začasne uredbe, in ne kot izvoznika ali prodajnega zastopnika.
Consequently, the claim should be rejected and the provisional findings confirmed.
Zato je treba trditev zavrniti in potrditi začasne ugotovitve.
In the absence of any other comments in this respect, recital 59 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene druge pripombe v zvezi s tem, se potrdi uvodna izjava 59 začasne uredbe.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, one Chinese exporting producer argued that certain important price differentials (e.g. the actual weight of the ironing board) were disregarded in comparing the normal value and the export price of different product types.
En kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik je po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov trdil, da niso bile upoštevane določene pomembne razlike med cenami (tj. dejanska teža likalne deske) pri primerjavi normalne vrednosti in izvozno ceno različnih vrst izdelka.
In this respect, it is noted that the different product types were grouped in order to reflect the major physical characteristics and cost/pricedrivers on the one hand and to permit sufficiently representative matching of the exported types with the types sold by the cooperating Turkish producer on its domestic market on the other hand.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da so bile različne vrste izdelka razvrščene v skupine, da bi bolje odražale glavne fizikalne lastnosti in stroškovne/cenovne dejavnike na eni strani ter za dovolj reprezentativno ujemanje izvoznih vrst izdelka z vrstami, ki jih prodaja sodelujoči turški proizvajalec na svojem domačem trgu, na drugi strani.
The following main characteristics were considered for comparison purposes: type, size, construction and material of top, material of legs, presence and type of iron rest, presence of accessories like sleeve board, linen rack, socket.
Pri primerjavi so bile upoštevane naslednje glavne lastnosti: vrsta, velikost, konstrukcija in material, material podnožja, vključenost in vrsta odlagalne površine, vključenost dodatkov, kot so rokavnik, platneno stojalo, vtičnica.
The weight and other criteria mentioned by the exporting producer in question are indirectly reflected in certain criteria considered for the comparison (by way of example, the weight is reflected in size of the top of the ironing board and its construction material).
Teža in druga merila, ki jih navedel navedeni proizvajalec izvoznik, se neposredno odražajo v določenih merilih, upoštevanih v primerjavi (teža se na primer odraža v velikosti prevleke likalne deske in materiala konstrukcije).
Consequently, the claim could not be accepted.
Zato se zahtevek zavrne.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, several parties requested more information concerning the adjustments to the normal value used for the exporting producers not granted MET.
Več strank je po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov zahtevalo več informacij glede prilagoditve normalne vrednosti, uporabljene za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim ni bila odobrena TGO.
In this respect, it is noted that the specific disclosure documents communicated to each cooperating party gave an exhaustive list of the various adjustments granted and that as in all cases adjustments were made where this was proven to be warrant.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je v posebnih dokumentih o razkritju, ki so bili poslani vsaki sodelujoči stranki, razviden obsežen seznam različnih odobrenih prilagoditev in da so bile prilagoditve izvedene povsod, kjer je bilo to potrebno.
In particular, the normal value based on the analogue country was adjusted downwards in order to eliminate the effects of (a) the differences in the physical characteristics described in recital 62 of the provisional Regulation, (b) the differences in the level of trade also described in recital 62 of the provisional Regulation and (c) the differences in the cost of the credit granted for the domestic sales under consideration.
Predvsem je bila normalna vrednost, ki je temeljila na primerljivi državi, prilagojena navzdol, da se odstrani učinke (a) razlik fizikalnih lastnosti, navedenih v uvodni izjavi 62 začasne uredbe, (b) razlik na ravni trgovanja, prav tako navedenih v uvodni izjavi 62 začasne uredbe, in (c) razlik v stroških odobrenega kredita za zadevno domačo prodajo.
No other differences were established and, thus, no other adjustments were made.
Ker niso bile ugotovljene nobene druge razlike, ni bilo drugih prilagoditev.
The sole Ukrainian exporting producer claimed that the Commission, when determining for comparison purposes the adjustments to the export price, made certain non-justified deductions in relation to certain elements concerning transport and credit costs.
Edini ukrajinski proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da je Komisija pri določanju prilagoditev izvozne cene zaradi primerjave naredila nekatere neupravičene odbitke v povezavi z določenimi elementi glede transporta in stroškov kredita.
The Commission accepted the claim and revised the relevant adjustments accordingly.
Komisija se je strinjala s trditvijo in pregledala ustrezne prilagoditve.
In the absence of any other comments in this respect, recitals 60 to 62 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb v zvezi s tem ni bilo, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 60 do 62 začasne uredbe.
In the light of the above, the definitive dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the cif Community frontier price duty unpaid, are the following:
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega so dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, naslednje:
all other companies 38,1 %.
vse druge družbe 38,1 %.
The revised definitive dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the cif Community frontier price duty unpaid, are the following:
Pregledane dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek vrednosti CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, so:
all other companies 9,9 %.
vse druge družbe 9,9 %.
In the absence of any comments in this respect, recitals 72 and 73 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s tem ni bilo nobene pripombe, se potrdita uvodni izjavi 72 in 73 začasne uredbe.
In the absence of any comments in this respect, recitals 74 to 76 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene pripombe v zvezi s tem, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 74 do 76 začasne uredbe.
In the absence of any comments in this respect, recitals 77 and 78 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s tem ni bilo nobene pripombe, se potrdita uvodni izjavi 77 in 78 začasne uredbe.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, one of the parties referred to in recital 83 of the provisional Regulation reiterated its claim to analyse the influence of the dumped imports from Ukraine separately from the dumped imports from the PRC, because there allegedly are fundamental differences as far as the price level and the import volume development are concerned.
Ena stranka, navedena v uvodni izjavi 83 začasne uredbe, je po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov ponovila svojo trditev, da je treba učinek dampinškega uvoza iz Ukrajine analizirati ločeno od dampinškega uvoza iz LRK zaradi domnevnih bistvenih razlik med ravnijo cene in obsegom uvoza.
However, no further justification was submitted to support the claim.
Vendar ni za trditev predložila nobenih dodatnih dokazov.
As regards prices, it is recalled that the absolute difference in the level of the prices between the two countries is not decisive in the context of the cumulative assessment since it may reflect a number of factors, including a different product mix of the imports from each country; price trends followed however a similar trend (see recital 84 of the provisional Regulation).
Glede cen, je treba opozoriti, da v okviru kumulativne ocene absolutna razlika v ravni cen med obema državama ni odločilna, saj lahko odraža številne dejavnike, vključno z različnim prodajnim programom uvoza iz vsake države; vendar so cenovna gibanja sledila enakemu trendu (glej uvodno izjavo 84 začasne uredbe).
As regards volumes, the volume of imports from each country was significant in the IP and it had an increasing trend over the period considered.
Obseg uvoza je bil iz vsake države v OP znaten in je v obravnavanem obdobju naraščal.
The fact that the Ukrainian producer only started its production operation in 2003 is not relevant in establishing any injury in the IP.
Dejstvo, da je edini ukrajinski proizvajalec svojo dejavnost začel opravljati šele leta 2003 za določitev kakršne koli škode v OP ni pomembno.
Consequently, the claim should be rejected again, and the cumulative assessment of the effects of the dumped imports set out in recitals 79 to 86 of the provisional Regulation confirmed.
Zato je treba trditev ponovno zavrniti in potrditi kumulativno presojo učinka dampinškega uvoza, določeno v uvodnih izjavah 79 do 86 začasne uredbe.
One importer argued that the import prices of the cooperating exporting producers from the PRC, as established by the Commission for the undercutting calculation (see recital 92 of the provisional Regulation), do not reflect certain unavoidable additional costs borne on importation from the PRC, such as the palletisation costs and the costs for storage, dispatching and transport from a transition warehouse to the importer’s warehouse.
En uvoznik je trdil, da uvozne cene sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK, kot jih je določila Komisija za izračun nelojalnega nižanja cen (glej uvodno izjavo 92 začasne uredbe), ne odražajo določenih neizogibnih dodatnih stroškov, povezanih z uvozom iz LRK, kot so stroški paletizacije, skladiščenja, razpošiljanja in transporta iz prehodnega skladišča v skladišče uvoznika.
In the case of the palletisation costs, the investigation has confirmed that such costs are indeed born in the Community, since ironing boards are normally shipped loose in containers from the PRC.
Glede stroškov paletizacije je bilo v preiskavi potrjeno, da ti stroški v Skupnosti resnično nastanejo, saj so likalne deske iz LRK običajno odposlane posamično in v zabojnikih.
The claim was thus considered warranted and the import prices of the cooperating exporting producers from the PRC were amended accordingly.
Trditev se je štela za utemeljeno in uvozne cene sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK so bile ustrezno spremenjene.
In the case of all other additional costs mentioned above, the claim could not be accepted since such costs are rather specific for the importer concerned and are not necessarily borne by other importers.
Glede ostalih dodatnih zgoraj navedenih stroškov se trditev ne more sprejeti, saj so taki stroški značilni za zadevnega uvoznika, ne pa nujno tudi za ostale uvoznike.
Moreover, such costs may be borne by Community producers as well.
Poleg tega imajo take stroške tudi proizvajalci Skupnosti.
The provisional undercutting margins for the dumped imports from the PRC were accordingly amended as follows:
Začasne stopnje nelojalno znižanih cen za dampinški uvoz iz LRK so bile ustrezno spremenjene:
No comments were received concerning the 6,6 % undercutting found for Ukraine, which is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z ugotovljenim 6,6 % nelojalnim nižanjem cen, ugotovljenim za Ukrajino, ni bilo pripomb, je to nelojalno nižanje cen potrjeno.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the dumped imports from the countries concerned, recitals 87 to 92 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb v zvezi z dampinškim uvozom iz zadevnih držav, se uvodne izjave 87 do 92 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, the complainants argued that its profit margin during the IP should not reflect the extraordinary and temporary management remuneration cuts of certain Community producers in the IP (see recital 100 of the provisional Regulation).
Pritožniki so po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov trdili, da njihova stopnja dobička med OP ne sme odražati izrednih in začasnih znižanj plačil za upravo nekaterih proizvajalcev Skupnosti v OP (glej uvodno izjavo 100 začasne uredbe).
In order to reflect consistently during the period considered the economic situation of the Community industry and since verified evidence in this respect was available, the claim was accepted.
Za dosledno odražanje gospodarskega položaja industrije Skupnosti v obravnavanem obdobju in ker so bili v zvezi s tem na razpolago preverljivi dokazi, je bila trditev sprejeta.
The figures and the provisional conclusions on the profitability of the Community industry were accordingly amended as follows:
Vrednosti in začasne sklepne ugotovitve o dobičkonosnosti industrije Skupnosti so bile ustrezno spremenjene:
Source: verified questionnaire replies
Vir: preverjeni odgovori na vprašalnik.
Thus, over the period considered profitability of the Community industry deteriorated.
Dobičkonosnost industrije Skupnosti se je v obravnavanem obdobju poslabšala.
Profit margin in the IP was by 69 % lower than in 2002.
Stopnja dobička je bila v OP za 69 % nižja kot leta 2002.
Consequently, the return on investment and cash flow of the Community industry were amended in order to reflect the above described corrections to the remunerations and profit in the IP.
Donosnost naložb in denarni tok industrije Skupnosti so bili spremenjeni, da bi odražali zgoraj opisane spremembe plačil in dobiček v OP.
The revised figures in the table below present a worse development of these two injury indicators in the IP than that set out in recitals 102 and 103 of the provisional Regulation:
Pregledane vrednosti v spodnji preglednici predstavljajo slabši razvoj teh dveh kazalnikov škode v OP, kot je, naveden v uvodnih izjavah 102 in 103 začasne uredbe.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the situation of the Community industry, recitals 94 to 107 of the provisional Regulation, modified as set out in recitals 44 and 46 above, are hereby confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb v zvezi s stanjem industrije Skupnosti ni bilo, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 94 do 107 začasne uredbe, kakor so bile spremenjene v uvodnih izjavah 44 in 46 zgoraj.
The above revised factors, i.e. price undercutting, profitability, return on investment and cash flow of the Community industry in the IP, left unaffected the conclusions on all injury factors set out in the provisional Regulation confirming that the Community industry suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation.
Zgoraj pregledani dejavniki, tj. nelojalno nižanje cen, dobičkonosnost, donosnost naložb in denarni tok industrije Skupnosti v OP, niso vplivali na sklepne ugotovitve o vseh dejavnikih škode, določenih v začasni uredbi, ki potrjujejo, da je industrija Skupnosti utrpela škodo v smislu člena 3(5) osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, and in the absence of any other comments in this respect, recitals 108 to 110 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Zato in ker drugih pripomb v zvezi s tem ni bilo, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 108 do 110 začasne uredbe.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, certain parties referred to in recital 134 of the provisional Regulation simply reiterated that the injury suffered by the Community Industry was self-inflicted.
Določene stranke, navedene v uvodni izjavi 134 začasne uredbe, so po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov ponovile svojo trditev, da je bila škoda, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti samopovzročena.
However, no new evidence and no new arguments were brought forward in this respect, and their claim was therefore rejected.
Vendar v zvezi s tem niso bili predloženi nobeni novi argumenti, zato je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
In the light of the above and in the absence of any new comments concerning causation, recitals 111 to 141 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega in ker ni bilo predloženih drugih pripomb v zvezi z vzročno zvezo, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 111 do 141 začasne uredbe.
General remarks and Interest of the Community industry
Splošne opombe in interes industrije Skupnosti
In the absence of any comments in this respect, recitals 142 to 146 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene pripombe v zvezi s tem, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 142 do 146 začasne uredbe.
Following the provisional disclosure, one importer disagreed with certain assessments quoted in recital 148 of the provisional Regulation.
En uvoznik se po začasnem razkritju ni strinjal z določenimi ocenami, navedenimi v uvodni izjavi 148 začasne uredbe.
In particular, it challenged the assumption made that (i) any burden of anti-dumping measures would be allocated evenly between the importers, retailers and consumers and, (ii) the total markup between import and retail price is around 500 %.
Zlasti je spodbijal domnevo, da (i) bo vsa obremenitev protidampinških ukrepov enakomerno porazdeljena med uvoznike, trgovce na drobno in potrošnike ter da (ii) je skupni pribitek med uvozno in maloprodajno ceno približno 500 %.
It was argued that the burden will be fully passed on to consumers, since the importer’s margin is already low and retailers are not likely to reduce their margin, although the latter is considerable.
Trdil je, da bo celotna obremenitev prenesena na potrošnike, ker je stopnja dobička uvoznika že tako nizka, za trgovce na drobno pa ni verjetno, da bodo zmanjšali svojo stopnjo dobička, čeprav je ta znatna.
As far as the markup is concerned, it was argued that an ironing board imported at EUR 6,53 which is the average unit dumped import price at the Community frontier, will most likely be retailed at less than EUR 35, which is approximately the average retail price of an ironing board in the Community, and, thus, the analysis based on the average retail and import prices is misleading and shows unrealistic margins.
V zvezi s pribitkom je trdil, da je likalna deska uvožena po ceni 6,53 EUR, kar je povprečna dampinška uvozna cena na enoto meja Skupnosti, njena najverjetnejša maloprodajna cena pa je približno 35 EUR, kar je povprečna maloprodajna cena likalne deske v Skupnosti, in zato je analiza na podlagi povprečne maloprodajne in uvozne cene zavajajoča in kaže nerealne stopnje dobička.
It was also noted that the value added tax element was not considered in the calculation.
Opozoril je tudi, da v izračunu ni bil upoštevan davek na dodano vrednost.
According to this importer, the total markup would rather be at most 300 %.
Po mnenju tega uvoznika bi bil skupen pribitek največ 300 %.
In respect of the impact on the consumers, it should be recalled that no representations were received from consumers’ organisations, neither before nor after the publication of the provisional Regulation.
V zvezi z učinkom na potrošnike je treba opozoriti, da združenja potrošnikov niso niti pred niti po objavi začasne uredbe predložila nobenih pripomb.
In fact, even if the burden would be fully passed on to consumers, the latter would have to pay in addition on average around EUR 1,5 for a durable good with a useful life of at least five years (estimate being based on 2005 market shares and prices and on the definitive duty rates).
Celo če bi bila obremenitev v celoti prenesena na potrošnike, bi slednji morali plačati samo dodatnih 1,5 EUR za blago z dobo trajanja najmanj pet let (ocena na podlagi tržnih deležev, in povprečnih cen za leto 2005 ter dokončnih stopenj dajatev).
Secondly, given the keen competition in this market, it is highly unlikely that any of the operators involved in importation and sale of the product concerned would absorb any of the anti-dumping duty imposed.
Drugič, glede na močno konkurenco v sektorju je skrajno neverjetno, da bi kateri koli nosilec dejavnosti, vključen v uvoz in prodajo zadevnega izdelka, absorbiral katero koli uvedeno protidampinško dajatev.
Therefore, the scenario according to which the burden would be distributed evenly appears to be more realistic.
Zato je verjetnejše predvidevanje, da se bodo obremenitve porazdelile enakomerno.
Indeed, no other party involved in this proceeding disputed such assessment.
Nobena druga stranka v postopku ni nasprotovala tej oceni.
Thus, the conclusion drawn in recital 149 of the provisional Regulation can be confirmed.
Zato se lahko potrdi sklepna ugotovitev iz uvodne izjave 149 začasne uredbe.
In respect of the markups applied by the operators, it is hereby recalled that no retailer cooperated in the investigation and, thus, no detailed and verifiable evidence on the retail prices and on the margins applied at this stage was available.
Glede pribitka, ki ga imajo nosilci dejavnosti, je treba opozoriti, da v preiskavi ni sodeloval noben trgovec na drobno, zato podrobni in preverljivi dokazi o maloprodajnih cenah in uporabljenih stopnjah dobička v tej fazi niso dosegljivi.
The assessment could therefore only be based on a comparison between the price of dumped imports, known from the questionnaire replies, and the average retail price, estimated on the basis of the information received from importers and the Community industry.
Ocena lahko zato temelji zgolj na primerjavi med ceno dampinškega uvoza, znano iz izpolnjenih vprašalnikov, in povprečno maloprodajno ceno, ocenjeno na podlagi prejetih informacij uvoznikov in industrije Skupnosti.
According to this information, the average retail price refers to all such sales in the Community, including inter alia value added tax.
Glede na to informacijo se povprečna maloprodajna cena nanaša na celotno tako prodajo v Skupnosti, vključno z, med drugim, davkom na dodano vrednost.
The total markup applied by importers, retailers and any other operator involved in distribution of dumped imports to consumers thus established is around 450 %.
Tako določen skupni pribitek uvoznikov, trgovcev na drobno in drugih nosilcev dejavnosti, vključenih v distribucijo dampinškega uvoza potrošnikom, je približno 450 %.