natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The figures for 2011 can serve as the long-term value.
Te številke za leto 2011 lahko služijo kot dolgoročna vrednost.
That year, return on equity will be 9 % (net profit of PLN 4 million on own capital of PLN 44 million).
Tisto leto bo donosnost lastniškega kapitala 9 % (4 milijone PLN neto dobička iz 44 milijonov PLN lastnega kapitala).
While not very high, this level appears to be justified in the light of the fact that BB operates in a market with significant competition from Asia and in which margins are squeezed.
Čeprav ta raven ni zelo visoka, se zdi, da je upravičena, ob upoštevanju dejstva, da podjetje BB deluje na trgu, na katerem je prisotna močna konkurenca iz Azije in na katerem so marže zmanjšane.
On the basis of these elements, the Commission concludes that implementation of the restructuring plan will restore the company’s viability provided that restructuring includes implementation of the investments planned for 2010 and the restructuring period is extended until end-2010.
Na podlagi teh podatkov Komisija ugotavlja, da se bo z izvajanjem načrta za prestrukturiranje obnovila sposobnost preživetja podjetja, če bo prestrukturiranje vključevalo izvedbo naložb, načrtovanih za leto 2010, in se bo obdobje prestrukturiranja podaljšalo do konca leta 2010.
Avoidance of undue distortion of competition
Izogibanje neupravičenemu izkrivljanju konkurence
Following the Commission’s decision pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty, the Polish authorities proposed three alternative compensatory measures that could be implemented by BB.
Po odločbi Komisije v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES so poljski organi predlagali tri druge izravnalne ukrepe, ki bi jih podjetje BB lahko izvedlo.
As for the first proposal, i.e. a 5 % reduction of the number of items produced, the Commission notes that BB is naturally evolving towards a smaller product range, but with a higher added value.
V zvezi s prvim predlogom, tj. 5-odstotnim znižanjem števila izdelanih predmetov, Komisija ugotavlja, da se podjetje BB naravno razvija proti manjšemu asortimentu proizvodov, vendar z višjo dodano vrednostjo.
Accordingly, the Commission takes the view that this measure may have no impact on the company’s behaviour in practice, and hence will not ensure that BB’s market presence is reduced.
Tako po mnenju Komisije ta ukrep mogoče ne bo vplival na vedenje podjetja v praksi in tako mogoče ne bo zagotovil, da se prisotnost podjetja BB na trgu zmanjša.
The second option envisaged the sale of 5 % of the company’s machines.
Druga možnost je predvidevala prodajo 5 % strojev podjetja.
Taking into account the fact that BB plans to implement a significant modernisation programme which includes the purchase of new, more efficient machines, the Commission does not regard this option as a valid compensatory measure, given that the production capacity of the sold machines could be offset by the higher capacity of the new equipment.
Ob upoštevanju dejstva, da podjetje BB namerava izvesti program znatne posodobitve, ki vključuje nakup novih, učinkovitejših strojev, Komisija te možnosti ne obravnava kot veljavni izravnalni ukrep, saj bi se lahko proizvodna zmogljivost prodanih strojev nadomestila z višjo zmogljivostjo nove opreme.
In the light of the above, the Commission takes the view that these two options do not ensure that the adverse effects of the aid on competition are limited.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno Komisija meni, da ti dve možnosti ne zagotavljata, da so škodljivi učinki pomoči na konkurenco omejeni.
The third option consists in the sale of the company’s production division in […].
Tretja možnost je prodaja proizvodnega obrata podjetja v […].
This sale would reduce BB’s product range by 46 %, its turnover by 13 % and the number of machine tools by 12 %.
S to prodajo bi se za 46 % zmanjšal asortiment proizvodov podjetja BB, njegov promet za 13 %, število strojnega orodja pa za 12 %.
As such, this option incorporates the solutions provided for in the first two proposals, plus additional elements.
Ta možnost kot taka vključuje rešitve, predvidene v prvih dveh predlogih, in dodatne elemente.
In addition, once the […] production division is put up for sale, the company’s potential competitors will have an opportunity to acquire an organised part of BB’s capacities, which could mitigate the negative effects of the aid.
Poleg tega bodo morebitni konkurenti podjetja, ko bo proizvodni obrat v […] naprodaj, imeli možnost, da kupijo organizirani del zmogljivosti podjetja BB, kar bi lahko ublažilo negativne učinke pomoči.
Lastly, the production division in […] is viable, generating profits of PLN 1,2 million in 2006, and as such it is not necessary to sell it for restructuring purposes.
Ne nazadnje, proizvodni obrat v […] je sposoben preživeti, saj je leta 2006 ustvaril 1,2 milijona PLN dobička od prodaje, in ga kot takega ni treba prodati za namene prestrukturiranja.
In the light of the above, the Commission takes the view that the sale of the division in […] constitutes a valid and sufficient compensatory measure.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega Komisija meni, da prodaja obrata v […] pomeni veljavni in zadosten izravnalni ukrep.
Aid limited to the minimum
Pomoč, omejena na najmanjši možni znesek
In paragraph 45 of the decision to initiate proceedings, the Commission expressed doubts that the planned repayment of certain debts during the restructuring period [6] could be incorporated into restructuring costs.
Komisija je v odstavku 45 odločbe o sprožitvi postopkov izrazila dvome, da bi se načrtovano poplačilo nekaterih dolgov med obdobjem prestrukturiranja [6] lahko vključilo v stroške prestrukturiranja.
The Commission notes that these funds were borrowed as part of the normal financing of the company’s operations, and that they can be repaid with the company’s existing resources.
Komisija ugotavlja, da so bila ta sredstva izposojena kot del običajnega financiranja poslovanja podjetja in da se lahko vrnejo z obstoječimi sredstvi podjetja.
However, following extension of the restructuring period until 2010 with a view to including the investments to take place that year, these investments must be included in the list of restructuring costs.
Vendar pa je treba po podaljšanju obdobja prestrukturiranja do leta 2010, da bi se vključile naložbe, ki bodo potekale tisto leto, te naložbe vključiti v seznam stroškov prestrukturiranja.
In paragraphs 46 and 47 of the decision to initiate proceedings, the Commission raised doubts that certain measures notified by Poland could be considered as a beneficiary’s contribution pursuant to paragraph 43 and 44 of the Guidelines.
Komisija je v odstavkih 46 in 47 odločbe o sprožitvi postopkov izrazila dvome, da bi se lahko nekateri ukrepi, ki jih je priglasila Poljska, obravnavali kot prispevek prejemnika pomoči v skladu z odstavkoma 43 in 44 Smernic.
Therefore these measures will not be regarded as a beneficiary’s contribution in the following analysis.
Zato se ti ukrepi v naslednji analizi ne bodo obravnavali kot prispevek prejemnika pomoči.
As a result, the list of restructuring costs, the beneficiary’s contribution and state aid is as follows:
Zaradi tega je seznam stroškov prestrukturiranja, prispevka prejemnika in državne pomoči naslednji:
(PLN thousand)
(tisoč PLN)
Public debt restructuring
Prestrukturiranje javnega dolga
Sale of assets (site at ulica […])
Prodaja sredstev (obrat v ulici […])
Transfer of assets
Prenos sredstev
Sale of production division in […]
Prodaja proizvodnega obrata v […]
Own contribution/restructuring costs: 50,4 %
Lastni prispevek/stroški prestrukturiranja: 50,4 %
BB’s own contribution to total restructuring costs is therefore equivalent to 50,4 %, which is in line with the rescue and restructuring aid Guidelines.
Lastni prispevek podjetja BB k skupnim stroškom prestrukturiranja torej znaša 50,4 %, kar je v skladu s Smernicami o pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje.
Paragraph 45 of the Guidelines states: ‘To limit the distortive effect, the amount of the aid or the form in which it is granted must be such as to avoid providing the company with surplus cash.’ The Commission observes that the firm is once again making a profit.
Odstavek 45 Smernic določa: „Zaradi omejevanja izkrivljajočega učinka mora biti znesek pomoči ali oblika, v kateri se dodeli, takšna, da podjetje ne dobi presežka denarnih sredstev.“ Komisija ugotavlja, da podjetje ponovno ustvarja dobiček.
However, its viability is threatened because of the amount of its immediately payable debts.
Vendar pa je njegova sposobnost preživetja ogrožena zaradi zneska dolgov, ki jih mora plačati takoj.
The fact that half of the aid was granted in the form of a loan helps to ensure that the aid is limited to the minimum necessary.
Dejstvo, da se je polovica pomoči dodelila v obliki posojila, zagotavlja, da je pomoč omejena na najmanjši možni znesek.
This is because the loan provides BB with immediate resources for repayment of its arrears.
To je zato, ker posojilo zagotavlja podjetju BB takojšnja sredstva za poplačilo njegovih zaostalih plačil.
At the same time, BB will have to repay this loan in the future.
Hkrati bo podjetje BB moralo to posojilo v prihodnosti vrniti.
This will be possible thanks to regular profits and will ensure that the firm does not accumulate surplus cash within the meaning of the Guidelines.
To bo lahko storilo zaradi rednih dobičkov in bo zagotovilo, da podjetje ne bo nakopičilo presežnih denarnih sredstev v smislu Smernic.
The Commission therefore takes the view that the aid is limited to the minimum necessary.
Komisija zato meni, da je pomoč omejena na najmanjši možni znesek.
The Commission concludes that the notified state aid in favour of Bison Bial can be declared compatible with the common market provided that the imposed conditions are met,
Komisija ugotavlja, da se lahko priglašena pomoč v korist podjetja Bison Bial razglasi za združljivo s skupnim trgom, če so izpolnjeni zahtevani pogoji –
The aid measures to the amount of PLN 31,43 million notified by Poland for Bison Bial are compatible with the common market, subject to the obligations and conditions set out in Article 2.
Ukrepi pomoči v znesku 31,43 milijona PLN, ki jih je Poljska priglasila za podjetje Bison Bial, so združljivi s skupnim trgom, ob upoštevanju obveznosti in pogojev, določenih v členu 2.
The restructuring period shall be extended until end-2010 and the restructuring plan shall be implemented in full.
Obdobje prestrukturiranja se podaljša do konca leta 2010, načrt za prestrukturiranje pa se izvede v celoti.
The site at ulica […] shall be sold by end-2010.
Obrat v ulici […] se bo prodal do konca leta 2010.
Investments of at least PLN 41,61 million shall be implemented by the end of the restructuring period, i.e. end-2010.
Naložbe v vrednosti najmanj 41,61 milijona PLN se bodo izvedle do konca obdobja prestrukturiranja, tj. do konca leta 2010.
The production division in […] shall be sold by end-2009 to a buyer independent of BB.
Proizvodni obrat v […] se bo prodal do konca leta 2009 kupcu, ki je neodvisen od podjetja BB.
The Polish authorities shall ensure that, prior to the sale, the business activity of the production division in […] is properly run, that it is provided with the means to enable its normal development and that no measures are taken by the beneficiary that would intentionally diminish its value, e.g. transfer of intangible assets, staff, customers or sales capacity to other parts of Bison Bial.
Poljski organi bodo zagotovili, da bo poslovna dejavnost v proizvodnem obratu v […] pred prodajo pravilno vodena, da bo imel na voljo dovolj sredstev, ki bodo zagotavljala njegov normalen razvoj, in da prejemnik pomoči ne bo sprejel nobenih ukrepov, ki bi namenoma zmanjšali njegovo vrednost, npr. prenos neopredmetenih sredstev, zaposlenih, strank ali prodajne zmogljivosti na druge dele podjetja Bison Bial.
The Polish authorities shall submit half-yearly progress reports on the restructuring process.
Poljski organi bodo predložili polletna poročila o napredku v zvezi s postopkom prestrukturiranja.
Done at Brussels, 12 September 2007.
V Bruslju, 12. septembra 2007.
OJ C 23, 1.2.2007, p. 20.
UL C 23, 1.2.2007, str. 20.
The Polish authorities suggested that in order to calculate the aid element of the measure, the value of assets that would be transferred to the Operator in exchange for debt cancellation should be deducted from the nominal value of aid.
Poljski organi so predlagali, da bi bilo treba za izračun elementa pomoči ukrepa vrednost sredstev, ki bi se prenesla na nosilca dejavnosti v zameno za odpis dolga, odšteti od nominalne vrednosti pomoči.
Basically, the transfer of these assets represents the company’s contribution to restructuring and it has no impact on the value of the aid measure.
V bistvu prenos teh sredstev pomeni prispevek podjetja k prestrukturiranju in nima nobenega vpliva na vrednost ukrepa pomoči.
Therefore in this case the aid element is equal to the nominal amount of aid.
Zaradi tega je v tem primeru element pomoči enak nominalni vrednosti pomoči.
See Table 1 of the decision to initiate proceedings.
Glej razpredelnico 1 odločbe o sprožitvi postopkov.
A detailed analysis of BB’s accounts points to a real improvement in the company’s operations since 2004-2005.
Podrobna analiza računovodske evidence podjetja BB kaže na dejansko izboljšanje poslovanja podjetja od 2004–2005 naprej.
Incidental events have made only a limited contribution to this improvement.
Nepredvideni dogodki so samo v omejenem obsegu prispevali k temu izboljšanju.
The notified restructuring plan assumed that restructuring costs for 2003-2009 would amount to PLN 138 million, the main item being financial restructuring costs of PLN 122,6 million. The remaining PLN 15,6 million are investment costs.
Priglašeni načrt za prestrukturiranje je predvideval, da bodo stroški prestrukturiranja za obdobje 2003–2009 znašali 138 milijonov PLN, pri čemer bi bili glavni del stroški finančnega prestrukturiranja v višini 122,6 milijona EUR. Preostalih 15,6 milijona PLN so stroški naložb.
on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis
o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda v imenu Evropske skupnosti
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 62, point 3 of the first subparagraph of Article 63, and Articles 66 and 95, in conjunction with the second sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 62, točke 3 prvega odstavka člena 63 ter členov 66 in 95 v povezavi z drugim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) in prvim pododstavkom člena 300(3) Pogodbe,
Having regard the opinion of the European Parliament,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega parlamenta,
Following the authorisation given to the Commission on 17 June 2002, negotiations with the Swiss Authorities, regarding the association of Switzerland with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis have been concluded.
Po pooblastilu Komisiji, danem dne 17. junija 2002, so bila pogajanja s švicarskimi oblastmi glede pridružitve Švice k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda zaključena.
In accordance with Council Decision 2004/860/EC, and subject to its conclusion at a later date, the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis has been signed on behalf of the European Community on 26 October 2004.
V skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2004/860/ES in s pridržkom njegove kasnejše sklenitve je bil Sporazum med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda dne 26. oktobra 2004 podpisan v imenu Evropske skupnosti.
The Agreement should now be approved.
Sporazum bi bilo treba sedaj odobriti.
As far as the development of the Schengen acquis, which falls under the Treaty establishing the European Community, is concerned the provisions of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the association of those two States with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, apply mutatis mutandis to relations with Switzerland.
Kar zadeva razvoj schengenskega pravnega reda, ki sodi na področje Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, se za odnose s Švico smiselno uporabljajo določbe Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES z dne 17. maja 1999 o nekaterih izvedbenih predpisih za uporabo Sporazuma, sklenjenega med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško, v zvezi s pridružitvijo teh dveh držav k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda.
This Decision does not prejudice the position of the United Kingdom, under the Protocol integrating the Schengen acquis into the framework of the European Union annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community and Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis.
Ta sklep ne posega v stališče Združenega kraljestva v skladu s Protokolom o vključitvi schengenskega pravnega reda v okvir Evropske unije, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, in v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/365/ES z dne 29. maja 2000 o prošnji Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda
This Decision does not prejudice the position of Ireland, under the Protocol integrating the Schengen acquis into the framework of the European Union annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community and Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland's request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis
Ta sklep ne posega v stališče Irske v skladu s Protokolom o vključitvi schengenskega pravnega reda v okvir Evropske unije, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, in v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2002/192/ES z dne 28. februarja 2002 o prošnji Irske, da sodeluje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda.
This Decision does not prejudice the position of Denmark, under the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Ta sklep ne posega v stališče Danske v skladu s Protokolom o stališču Danske, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti -
The Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, and the related documents consisting of the Final Act, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters on the Committees that assist the Commission in the exercise of its executive powers, and the Joint Declaration on joint meetings of the Mixed Committees are hereby approved on behalf of the European Community.
Sporazum med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda in z njim povezani dokumenti, in sicer Sklepna listina, Sporazum v obliki izmenjave pisem glede odborov, ki pomagajo Komisiji pri izvajanju njenih izvedbenih pooblastil, in Skupna izjava o skupnih zasedanjih mešanih odborov, se odobrijo v imenu Evropske skupnosti.
The text of the Agreement, the Final Act, the Exchange of Letters, and the Joint Declaration are attached to this Decision.
Besedila Sporazuma, Sklepne listine, Sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem in Skupne izjave so priložena temu sklepu.
This Decision applies to the fields covered by the provisions listed in Annexes A and B of the Agreement and to their development to the extent that such provisions have, or, in accordance with Decision 1999/436/EC, have been determined to have, a legal base within the Treaty establishing the European Community.Article 3
Ta sklep se uporablja za področja, ki jih urejajo določbe iz prilog A in B Sporazuma, ter za razvoj teh področij, kolikor imajo te določbe pravno podlago v Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti ali kolikor je Sklep 1999/436/ES določil, da imajo tako podlago.Člen 3
The provisions of Article 1 to 4 of Council Decision 1999/437/EC shall apply, in the same way, to the association of Switzerland with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, which falls under the Treaty establishing the European Community.
Določbe členov 1 do 4 Sklepa 1999/437/ES se na enak način uporabljajo za pridružitev Švice k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda iz Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti.
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person empowered to deposit on behalf of the European Community the Instrument of approval provided for in Article 14 of the Agreement, in order to express the consent of the Community to be bound.
Predsednik Sveta je pooblaščen, da imenuje osebo, pooblaščeno za deponiranje listine o odobritvi iz člena 14 Sporazuma v imenu Evropske skupnosti, s čimer izrazi soglasje Skupnosti, da jo Sporazum zavezuje.
Opinion of 13 October 2005 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 13. oktobra 2005 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
OJ L 131, 1.6.2000, p. 43.
ULL 131, 1.6.2000, str. 43.
on the signing, on behalf of the European Community, and the provisional application of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters on the amendments to the Protocol setting out, for the period from 18 January 2005 to 17 January 2011, the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Seychelles on fishing off Seychelles
o podpisu Sporazuma, v imenu Evropske skupnosti, in njegovi začasni uporabi v obliki izmenjave pisem glede sprememb Protokola o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti in finančnega prispevka, predvidenih s Sporazumom med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Republiko Sejšeli o ribolovu v obalnih vodah Sejšelov, za obdobje od 18. januarja 2005 do 17. januarja 2011
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 37, in conjunction with Article 300(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 37 v zvezi s členom 300(2) Pogodbe,
The Protocol setting out, for the period from 18 January 2005 to 17 January 2011, the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Seychelles on fishing off Seychelles was adopted by Council Regulation (EC) No 115/2006 [1] on 23 January 2006.
Protokol, ki za obdobje od 18. januarja 2005 do 17. januarja 2011 določa ribolovne možnosti in finančni prispevek v skladu s Sporazumom med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Republiko Sejšeli glede ribolova v obalnih vodah Sejšelov, je bil sprejet z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 115/2006 [1] z dne 23. januarja 2006.