natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Measures should be taken to ensure that authorisations granted for plant protection products containing diniconazole-M are withdrawn within a fixed period of time and are not renewed and that no new authorisations for such products are granted.
Sprejeti je treba ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo dinikonazol-M, prekličejo v predpisanem roku in se ne podaljšajo ali izdajo nove registracije takih sredstev.
Any period of grace granted by a Member State for the disposal, storage, placing on the market and use of existing stocks of plant protection products containing diniconazole-M should be limited to 12 months in order to allow existing stocks to be used in one further growing season, which ensures that plant protection products containing diniconazole-M remain available for 18 months from the adoption of this Decision.
Vsakršno podaljšanje roka za odstranjevanje, skladiščenje, dajanje v promet in uporabo obstoječih zalog fitofarmacevtskih sredstev z dinikonazolom-M, ki ga odobri država članica, je treba omejiti na obdobje 12 mesecev, da se omogoči uporaba obstoječih zalog v naslednji rastni sezoni, s čimer se zagotovi, da so fitofarmacevtska sredstva z dinikonazolom-M na razpolago 18 mesecev po sprejetju te odločbe.
This Decision does not prejudice the submission of an application for diniconazole-M in accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I [4], in view of a possible inclusion in its Annex I.
Ta odločba ne posega v predložitev zahtevka za dinikonazol-M v skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS in Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 33/2008 z dne 17. januarja 2008 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS glede rednega in pospešenega postopka za oceno aktivnih snovi, ki so bile del programa dela iz člena 8(2) navedene direktive, vendar niso bile vključene v Prilogo I [4], zaradi morebitne vključitve v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi.
Diniconazole-M shall not be included as an active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Dinikonazol-M se ne vključi kot aktivna snov v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
authorisations for plant protection products containing diniconazole-M are withdrawn by 18 March 2009;
se registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo dinikonazol-M, prekličejo do 18. marca 2009;
no authorisations for plant protection products containing diniconazole-M are granted or renewed from the date of publication of this Decision.
se od datuma objave te odločbe ne odobrijo ali podaljšajo nobene registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo dinikonazol-M.
concerning the non-inclusion of dicloran in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance
o nevključitvi diklorana v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o preklicu registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo navedeno snov
(notified under document number C(2008) 5086)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 5086)
Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC provides that a Member State may, during a period of 12 years following the notification of that Directive, authorise the placing on the market of plant protection products containing active substances not listed in Annex I to that Directive that are already on the market two years after the date of notification, while those substances are gradually being examined within the framework of a programme of work.
Člen 8(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS določa, da lahko država članica v obdobju 12 let po uradnem obvestilu navedene direktive dovoli dajanje v promet fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo aktivne snovi, ki niso uvrščene v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi in so v prometu že dve leti po datumu uradnega obvestila, pri tem pa se v okviru delovnega programa navedene snovi postopoma pregledujejo.
That list includes dicloran.
Navedeni seznam vključuje dikloran.
For dicloran the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed in accordance with the provisions laid down in Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 and (EC) No 1490/2002 for a range of uses proposed by the notifier.
Vplivi diklorana na zdravje ljudi in okolje so bili ocenjeni v skladu z določbami uredb (ES) št. 451/2000 in (ES) št. 1490/2002 za vrste uporab, ki jih je predlagal prijavitelj.
For dicloran the rapporteur Member State was Spain and all relevant information was submitted on 22 July 2005.
Država članica poročevalka za dikloran je bila Španija, vse ustrezne informacije pa so bile predložene 22. julija 2005.
The Commission examined dicloran in accordance with Article 11a of Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002.
Komisija je preučila dikloran v skladu s členom 11a Uredbe (ES) št. 1490/2002.
During the examination of this active substance by the Committee, it was concluded, taking into account comments received from Member States, that there are clear indications that it may be expected that it has harmful effects on human health and in particular on workers, because the exposure is greater than 100 % of the AOEL.
Odbor je pri pregledu te aktivne snovi ob upoštevanju pripomb držav članic ugotovil, da obstajajo jasni znaki, na podlagi katerih se lahko pričakuje škodljiv vpliv na zdravje ljudi in zlasti delavcev, saj izpostavljenost presega 100 % AOEL (raven izpostavljenosti delavca).
The Commission invited the notifier to submit its comments on the results of the examination of dicloran and on its intention or not to further support the substance.
Komisija je prijavitelja pozvala, naj predloži pripombe o rezultatih preučitve diklorana in sporoči, ali bo še naprej vztrajal pri vključitvi navedene snovi na seznam.
However, despite the arguments put forwards by the notifier, the concerns identified could not be eliminated, and assessments made on the basis of the information submitted have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing dicloran satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Toda kljub argumentom, ki jih je prijavitelj predložil, se navedenih pomislekov ni dalo odpraviti, po ocenah na podlagi predloženih informacij pa ne kaže pričakovati, da bi lahko fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo dikloran, pod predlaganimi pogoji uporabe na splošno izpolnjevala zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
Dicloran should therefore not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Dikloran se zato ne sme vključiti v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Measures should be taken to ensure that authorisations granted for plant protection products containing dicloran are withdrawn within a fixed period of time and are not renewed and that no new authorisations for such products are granted.
Sprejeti je treba ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo dikloran, prekličejo v predpisanem roku in se ne podaljšajo ali izdajo nove registracije za taka sredstva.
Any period of grace granted by a Member State for the disposal, storage, placing on the market and use of existing stocks of plant protection products containing dicloran should be limited to 12 months in order to allow existing stocks to be used in one further growing season, which ensures that plant protection products containing dicloran remain available for 18 months from the adoption of this Decision.
Če države članice odobrijo podaljšanje roka za odstranjevanje, skladiščenje, dajanje v promet in uporabo obstoječih zalog fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo dikloran, ga je treba omejiti na obdobje 12 mesecev, da se omogoči uporaba obstoječih zalog v naslednji rastni sezoni, s čimer se zagotovi, da fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo dikloran, ostanejo na razpolago 18 mesecev po sprejetju te odločbe.
This Decision does not prejudice the submission of an application for dicloran in accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I [4], in view of a possible inclusion in its Annex I.
Ta odločba ne vpliva na predložitev zahtevka za dikloran v skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS in Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 33/2008 z dne 17. januarja 2008 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS glede rednega in pospešenega postopka za oceno aktivnih snovi, ki so bile del programa dela iz člena 8(2) navedene direktive, vendar niso bile vključene v Prilogo I [4], zaradi morebitne uvrstitve v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi.
Dicloran shall not be included as an active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Dikloran se ne vključi kot aktivna snov v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
authorisations for plant protection products containing dicloran are withdrawn by 18 March 2009;
se registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo dikloran, prekličejo do 18. marca 2009;
no authorisations for plant protection products containing dicloran are granted or renewed from the date of publication of this Decision.
se od datuma objave te odločbe registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo dikloran, ne odobrijo ali podaljšajo.
concerning the non-inclusion of cyanamide in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance
o nevključitvi cianamida v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o preklicu registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo navedeno snov
(notified under document number C(2008) 5087)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 5087)
That list includes cyanamide.
Navedeni seznam vključuje cianamid.
For cyanamide the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed in accordance with the provisions laid down in Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 and (EC) No 1490/2002 for a range of uses proposed by the notifier.
Vplivi cianamida na zdravje ljudi in okolje so bili ocenjeni v skladu z določbami uredb (ES) št. 451/2000 in (ES) št. 1490/2002 za vrste uporab, ki jih je predlagal prijavitelj.
For cyanamide the rapporteur Member State was Germany and all relevant information was submitted on 3 January 2006.
Država članica poročevalka za cianamid je bila Nemčija, vse ustrezne informacije pa so bile predložene 3. januarja 2006.
During the examination of this active substance by the Committee, it was concluded, taking into account comments received from Member States, that there are clear indications that it may be expected that it has harmful effects on human health and in particular on operators, because the exposure is greater than 100 % of the AOEL.
Odbor je pri pregledu te aktivne snovi ob upoštevanju pripomb držav članic ugotovil, da se nedvomno pričakuje škodljiv vpliv na zdravje ljudi in zlasti izvajalcev tretiranja, saj izpostavljenost presega 100 % AOEL (dopustna izpostavljenost izvajalca tretiranja).
Moreover, other concerns which were identified by the rapporteur Member States in its assessment report are included in the review report for the substance.
Poleg tega so v poročilu o pregledu snovi izraženi tudi drugi pomisleki, ki jih je država članica poročevalka vključila v svoje poročilo o oceni.
The Commission invited the notifier to submit its comments on the results of the examination of cyanamide and on its intention or not to further support the substance.
Komisija je prijavitelja pozvala, naj predloži pripombe o rezultatih strokovnega pregleda cianamida in sporoči, ali bo še naprej vztrajal pri vključitvi navedene snovi na seznam.
The notifier submitted its comments which have been carefully examined.
Prijavitelj je predložil svoje pripombe, ki so bile natančno pregledane.
However, despite the arguments put forwards by the notifier, the concerns identified could not be eliminated, and assessments made on the basis of the information submitted have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing cyanamide satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Toda kljub argumentom prijavitelja navedenih pomislekov ni bilo mogoče odpraviti, po ocenah na podlagi predloženih informacij pa ni pričakovati, da bi lahko fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo cianamid, pod predvidenimi pogoji uporabe na splošno izpolnjevala zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
Cyanamide should therefore not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Cianamid se zato ne sme vključiti v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Measures should be taken to ensure that authorisations granted for plant protection products containing cyanamide are withdrawn within a fixed period of time and are not renewed and that no new authorisations for such products are granted.
Sprejeti je treba ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo cianamid, prekličejo v predpisanem roku in se ne podaljšajo ali izdajo nove registracije takih sredstev.
Any period of grace granted by a Member State for the disposal, storage, placing on the market and use of existing stocks of plant protection products containing cyanamide should be limited to 12 months in order to allow existing stocks to be used in one further growing season, which ensures that plant protection products containing cyanamide remain available for 18 months from the adoption of this Decision.
Vsakršno podaljšanje roka za odstranjevanje, skladiščenje, dajanje v promet in uporabo obstoječih zalog fitofarmacevtskih sredstev s cianamidom, ki ga odobri država članica, je treba omejiti na obdobje 12 mesecev, da se omogoči uporaba obstoječih zalog v naslednji rastni sezoni, s čimer se zagotovi, da so fitofarmacevtska sredstva s cianamidom na razpolago 18 mesecev po sprejetju te odločbe.
This Decision does not prejudice the submission of an application for cyanamide in accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I [4], in view of a possible inclusion in its Annex I.
Ta odločba ne vpliva na predložitev zahtevka za cianamid v skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS in Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 33/2008 z dne 17. januarja 2008 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS glede rednega in pospešenega postopka za oceno aktivnih snovi, ki so bile del programa dela iz člena 8(2) navedene direktive, vendar niso bile vključene v Prilogo I [4], zaradi morebitne vključitve v njeno Prilogo I.
Cyanamide shall not be included as an active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Cianamid se ne vključi kot aktivna snov v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
authorisations for plant protection products containing cyanamide are withdrawn by 18 March 2009;
se registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo cianamid, prekličejo do 18. marca 2009;
no authorisations for plant protection products containing cyanamide are granted or renewed from the date of publication of this Decision.
se od datuma objave te odločbe ne odobrijo ali podaljšajo nobene registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo cianamid.
The Commission examined cyanamide in accordance with Article 11a of Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002. A draft review report for that substance was reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 20 May 2008 in the format of the Commission review report.
Komisija je cianamid pregledala v skladu s členom 11a Uredbe (ES) št. 1490/2002 Osnutek poročila o pregledu za navedeno snov so države članice in Komisija pregledale v okviru Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter končno različico pripravile 20. maja 2008 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu.
of 20 May 2008
z dne 20. maja 2008
on State aid implemented by France for building the cruise vessel Le Levant (C 74/99 (ex-NN 65/99))
o državni pomoči Francije za gradnjo potniške ladje Le Levant (C 74/99 (ex NN 65/99))
(notified under document number C(2007) 5419)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 5419)
Having regard to Council Directive 90/684/EEC of 21 December 1990 on aid to shipbuilding [1] and in particular Article 4(7) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 90/684/EGS z dne 21. decembra 1990 o pomoči ladjedelništvu [1] in zlasti člena 4(7) Direktive,
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [2] and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi členi [2], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
On learning of the aid which is the subject of this decision, the Commission initially asked the French authorities for information by letters dated 2 December 1998 and 4 June 1999.
Komisija je, potem ko je bila seznanjena s pomočjo, ki je predmet te odločbe, z dopisoma z dne 2. decembra 1998 in 4. junija 1999 francoske organe najprej zaprosila za podatke.
The French authorities submitted comments by letters dated 12 May 1999 (A/33645) and 19 August 1999 (A/36449).
Francoski organi so predložili pripombe v dopisih z dne 12. maja 1999 (A/33645) in 19. avgusta 1999 (A/36449).
In the light of this information, by decision of 2 December 1999 [3], the Commission initiated the formal investigation procedure provided for in Article 88(2) of the Treaty in respect of certain aid granted for building the cruise vessel Le Levant.
Komisija je ob upoštevanju pripomb z Odločbo z dne 2. decembra 1999 [3] sprožila formalni postopek preiskave v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe glede pomoči, namenjenih gradnji potniške ladje Le Levant.
Following this decision, the French authorities submitted observations by letters dated 12 January 2000 (A/30357), 14 June 2000 (A/34964), 30 April 2001 (A/33440) and 11 June 2001 (A/34609).
Francoski organi so po tej odločbi predložili pripombe z dopisi z dne 12. januarja 2000 (A/30357), 14. junija 2000 (A/34964), 30. aprila 2001 (A/33440) in 11. junija 2001 (A/34609).
The Commission also received comments from an interested party, Compagnie des Îles du Levant (hereinafter referred to as CIL), which were forwarded to the French authorities and to which they replied.
Komisija je prejela tudi pripombe s strani zainteresirane stranke Compagnie des Iles du Levant (v nadaljnjem besedilu „družba CIL“), ki so bile posredovane francoskim organom in na katere so francoski organi odgovorili.
The proceedings culminated in Commission Decision 2001/882/EC of 25 July 2001 on the State aid implemented by France in the form of development assistance for the cruise vessel ‘Le Levant’, built by Alstom Leroux Naval for operation in Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon [4], by which the Commission found the aid incompatible with the common market and called on France to ‘take all necessary measures to discontinue and recover [the aid] from the investors, as the direct beneficiaries and current owners of the cruise vessel’.
Odločba Komisije 2001/882/ES z dne 25. julija 2001 o državni pomoči Francije v obliki razvojne pomoči za potniško ladjo Le Levant, ki jo je zgradil Alstom Leroux Naval za uporabo v Saint-Pierre in Miquelonu [4] je zaključila formalni postopek preiskave s sklepom, da je državna pomoč nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom, ter od Francije zahtevala, da „sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe za prekinitev in izterjavo [pomoči] od vlagateljev, ki so neposredni prejemniki pomoči in so sedanji lastniki potniške ladje“.
Decision 2001/882/EC was annulled by judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 22 February 2006 [5].
Sodišče prve stopnje ES je Odločbo 2001/882/ES razveljavilo s sodbo z dne 22. februarja 2006 [5].
The Court found in particular that the statement of reasons in the Commission’s Decision was incomplete and that it was not therefore able to confirm that elements constituting State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty were present.
Sodišče je zlasti menilo, da odločba Komisije ni vsebovala zadostnih utemeljitev, da bi lahko preverilo obstoj sestavnih elementov državne pomoči v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe.
As a result of the Court’s judgment, the investigation procedure initiated by the decision of 2 December 1999 is still open.
Po sodbi Sodišča postopek preiskave, ki se je začel z Odločbo z dne 2. decembra 1999, še poteka.
In the light of the grounds of the Court’s judgment and of new information brought to its attention, the Commission deemed it appropriate to ask the French authorities and interested parties to submit their comments again on the basis of Article 88(2) of the Treaty.
Z ozirom na razloge sodbe Sodišča in na nove informacije, ki jih je Komisija prejela, je slednja štela za primerno, da na podlagi člena 88(2) Pogodbe ponovno pozove francoske organe in zainteresirane stranke, da predložijo svoje pripombe.
The decision of 2 December 1999 to initiate the formal investigation procedure was therefore supplemented by a decision of 6 December 2006 [6].
Odločba Komisije z dne 2. decembra 1999, da sproži formalni postopek preiskave, je bila dopolnjena z Odločbo z dne 6. decembra 2006 [6].
Following that decision, the French authorities initially requested and were granted an extension of the deadline for a reply, before submitting their comments by letters dated 16 March 2007 (A/32335) and 12 December 2007 (A/40301).
Francoski organi so po tej odločbi najprej zaprosili za podaljšanje roka za odgovor, ki jim je bilo odobreno, predložili svoje pripombe z dopisi z dne 16. marca 2007 (A/32335) in 12. decembra 2007 (A/40301).
Observations were also submitted by interested parties, namely CIL, by letter registered on 21 March 2007 (A/32446), and the investors who were former shareholders in the joint-ownership companies, backed by the Bank [7], by letters registered on 1 March 2007 (A/31951) and 7 March 2007 (A/32026).
Svoje pripombe so predložile tudi zainteresirane stranke, od teh družba CIL z dopisom, evidentiranim 21. marca 2007 (A/32446), in vlagatelji, nekdanji družbeniki solastniških družb, ki jih je podprla banka [7], z dopisi, evidentiranimi 1. marca 2007 (A/31951) in 7. marca 2007 (A/32026).
The ‘Loi Pons’
Loi Pons
The amended Finance (Amendment) Act for 1986 of 11 July 1986 allowed tax concessions in relation to certain investments in the French overseas departments and territories (‘Loi Pons’).
Spremenjeni zakon z dne 11. julija 1986 o dopolnilnem finančnem zakonu za leto 1986 je predvideval davčne olajšave za določene francoske čezmorske naložbe (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Loi Pons“).
France notified the Commission of these measures so that their compatibility with the Community State aid legislation could be assessed.
Francija je ukrepe priglasila Komisiji, da bi ta proučila, ali so ukrepi združljivi z določbami Skupnosti na področju državnih pomoči.
By letter of 27 January 1993, the Commission informed France that, having examined the measures, it had decided not to raise objections under Articles 92 and Article 93 of the Treaty (now Articles 87 and 88).
Z dopisom z dne 27. januarja 1993 je Komisija obvestila Francijo, da se je po pregledu ukrepov odločila, da ukrepom ne bo nasprotovala na podlagi členov 92 in 93 Pogodbe (zdaj člena 87 in 88).