natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The rapid spread of alarm among consumers and the ban on Belgian animals and animal products imposed by various third countries seriously aggravated the crisis and severely disrupted the market on which Belgian producers sold their products, led to a loss of market share and, consequently, a reduction in turnover compared with what would have been expected in a normal market situation.
Hitro širjenje družbenega preplaha med potrošniki in embargo, ki ga je več tretjih držav uvedlo za uvoz živali in proizvodov živalskega izvora iz Belgije, sta znatno prispevala k spodbujanju krize in se preoblikovala v resno motnjo trga, na katerem so delovali belgijski proizvajalci, izgubo tržnega deleža in posledično znižanje dobička, predvidenega za običajne tržne razmere.
Neither the chemical contamination of products nor the fall in sales was sufficient in itself to conclude that this was an exceptional occurrence, which was the result of significant measures to restrict the marketing and exportation of these products, combined with the sharp fall in sales and prices.
Kemična okužba proizvodov in upad prodaje sama po sebi nista zadostna za sklep, da ima dogodek izredne značilnosti, ki izvirajo iz kombinacije pomembnih omejevalnih ukrepov za trženje in izvoz teh proizvodov ter upada prodaje in znižanja cen.
The alarm among consumers and their reaction to the dioxin contamination of poultrymeat were only contributing factors to the exceptional nature of the occurrence.
Družbeni preplah in odziv potrošnikov ob okužbi perutninskega mesa z dioksinom sta le prispevala k izredni naravi dogodka.
In the case of Italian producers, it should be noted that no measures were adopted restricting the marketing or exportation of products and no restrictive measures were adopted to protect consumer health, since the country was not directly affected by the crisis.
V primeru italijanskih proizvajalcev se ugotavlja, da ni bil uveden noben omejevalni ukrep za prodajo in izvoz ter noben omejevalni ukrep za zaščito zdravja potrošnikov, ker kriza države neposredno ni prizadela.
The only unforeseeable factor that created disruption on the market was the spreading of alarm among consumers and their reaction to contamination detected elsewhere.
Edini nepredvidljiv in tržno moteč dejavnik je bilo širjenje družbenega preplaha in odziv potrošnikov na okužbo, do katere je prišlo drugje.
As stressed in recitals 37 to 40, neither the chemical contamination of foodstuffs intended for human consumption nor the spread of alarm among consumers constitutes an exceptional occurrence within the meaning of Article 87(2)(b).
Kot je bilo poudarjeno v odstavkih 35 do 38 kemična okužba živilskih proizvodov, namenjenih za človeka, ali širjenje družbenega preplaha sama po sebi nista izreden dogodek v smislu člena 87(2)(b) Pogodbe.
The Italian authorities also referred to the first BSE crisis in the United Kingdom.
Italijanski organi so se sklicevali tudi na prvo krizo BSE v Združenem kraljestvu.
In that case, the extraordinary situation in the beef and veal sector was caused by the total ban imposed on the exportation of live animals and of beef and veal from the United Kingdom to other Member States and to non-member countries.
V tem primeru je bil vzrok za izreden položaj na področju govejega mesa popolna prepoved izvoza živih živali in govejega mesa iz Združenega kraljestva v evropske države in tretje države.
The effects of the market measures adopted in response to the problem of BSE in the United Kingdom were unprecedented.
Vpliv tržnih ukrepov, sprejetih zaradi BSE, je zato v Združenem kraljestvu dosegel razsežnost, kot je še ni bilo.
The Commission pointed out that, in the context of the measures adopted to deal with the crisis, that there was a total ban on all British meat and meat products that might enter the human and animal food chain and an unprecedented fall in domestic meat consumption.
Med ukrepi, sprejetimi kot odziv na takšno krizo, Komisija navaja popoln embargo za britansko meso in tudi vse mesne proizvode, ki so lahko del človeške ali živalske prehrambene verige, ter upad notranje porabe mesa, kot ga še ni bilo.
The fall in consumption was related to the stringent restrictions imposed on the market, which had created a situation that could be described as exceptional.
Upad porabe je bil povezan s strogimi tržnimi omejitvami, kar je ustvarilo položaj, ki se lahko opredeli kot izjemen.
In addition, concerning more recent cases of BSE in Europe, the Commission pointed out that a fall in sales or incomes was not regarded as an exceptional event.
Razen tega je Komisija v najnovejših primerih BSE v Evropi poudarila, da padec prodaje in dohodka ni izreden dogodek.
The collapse in sales is regarded as the consequence of an exceptional occurrence, caused by an unusual combination of factors.
Upad prodaje se obravnava kot posledica izrednega dogodka, do katerega pride zaradi redke kombinacije različnih dogodkov.
As in the cases referred to above, aid intended to deal with an exceptional occurrence within the meaning of Article 87(2)(b) was approved in the countries directly concerned, in which various factors contributed to the exceptional nature of the crisis: the very serious negative repercussions on European agricultural producers, the alarm that spread among consumers, the ban imposed by a large number of non-member countries on animals and meat products from the EU and a series of incidents beyond the control of livestock farmers that aggravated the crisis situation and spread fear among consumers.
Kot v zgoraj navedenih primerih je bila pomoč za preprečevanje posledic izrednega dogodka v smislu člena 87(2)(b) Pogodbe odobrena v neposredno prizadetih državah, v katerih so različni dejavniki prispevali k izredni naravi krize, kot so: izjemno negativen vpliv na evropske kmetijske proizvajalce, družbeni preplah, ki se je razširil med potrošniki, in embargo, ki ga je več tretjih držav uvedlo za živali in mesne proizvode, ki izvirajo iz EU, ter niz nesreč, ki jih rejci niso mogli več nadzorovati ter so prispevale k zaostritvi kriznega položaja in širjenju strahu med potrošniki.
All this caused serious disruption of the market on which European producers sell their products, a subsequent loss of market share and a reduction in turnover compared with what would have been expected in a normal market situation.
To se je preoblikovalo v veliko motnjo trga, na katerem delujejo evropski proizvajalci, s posledično izgubo tržnih deležev in znižanjem dobička, predvidenega za običajne razmere na trgu.
A major factor that the Commission took into account in recognising that crisis as an exceptional occurrence was the stable and balanced situation on the market for beef and veal before the crisis.
Pomemben elementa, ki ga je Komisija upoštevala za priznavanje navedene krize kot izrednega dogodka, je stabilnost in ravnovesje trga govejega mesa pred izbruhom krize.
However, as shown below (see recitals 54 to 57 below) and as declared by the Italian authorities themselves (see letters dated 28 August and 15 November 2000), this was not the case with the market for chicken in Italy, on which there was already overproduction and falling prices.
Vendar to, kot je dokazano v nadaljevanju (prim. odstavke 52 do 55 spodaj) in kot so izjavili sami italijanski organi (prim. pismi z dne 28. avgusta 2000 in 15. novembra 2000), ni veljajo za italijanski piščančji trg, ki je že zabeležil prekomerno proizvodnjo in znižanje cen.
In all the cases referred to above, and in particular those referred to by the Italian authorities, the exceptional occurrence occurred in the country concerned and led to the adoption of a series of restrictive, market-control and health measures which contributed to a fall in sales and prices of the products concerned.
V vseh zgoraj navedenih primerih, zlasti tistih, ki so jih navedli italijanski organi, je izreden dogodek nastal v prizadeti državi in je povzročil sprejetje omejevalnih ukrepov, ukrepov za tržni nadzor in zdravstvenih ukrepov, s katerimi se povezuje upad prodaje in cen zadevnih proizvodov.
In addition, an exceptional occurrence must at least, by its nature and its effects on the operators concerned, differ sharply from the usual situation and the conditions under which the market normally operates.
Razen tega mora imeti izreden dogodek vsaj značilnosti dogodka, ki se po svoji naravi in vplivu na prizadete izvajalce odločno razlikuje od običajnih pogojev in se ne umešča med običajne pogoje za delovanje trga.
The unforeseeable nature of an occurrence and the difficulty in predicting it can contribute to its exceptional nature, but are not in themselves sufficient to declare it ‘exceptional’ within the meaning of Article 87(2)(b) of the Treaty.
Sama nepredvidljivost dogodka ali težavnost njegovega napovedovanja je lahko en element izrednega dogodka, vendar sama po sebi ni zadostna za razglasitev dogodka kot „izrednega“ v smislu člena 87(2)(b) Pogodbe.
In this case, the alleged fall in sales is no different from other events that determine demand, such as closure of an export market.
V zadevnem primeru se domneven padec prodaje ne razlikuje od drugih dogodkov, ki vplivajo na povpraševanje, kot je na primer zaprtje izvoznega trga.
Such events are just as unforeseeable, but form part of the normal commercial risks to which an undertaking is exposed and are in no way exceptional within the meaning of Article 87(2)(b) of the Treaty.
Takšen dogodek je prav tako nepredvidljiv, vendar se uvršča med običajna tržna tveganja podjetja in nima nobene značilnosti izjemnega dogodka v smislu člena 87(2)(b) Pogodbe.
According to the Italian authorities, Italian producers had no other market outlets, because the crisis had spread well beyond the borders of Belgium and the consumption of poultrymeat had fallen throughout Europe.
Italijanski organi menijo, da italijanski proizvajalci niso imeli drugih prodajnih možnosti, ker se je kriza razširila daleč prek belgijskih meja, zmanjšanje porabe perutninskega mesa pa se je zabeležilo po vsej Evropi.
However, according to information available to the Commission, intra-Community exports of poultry in June and August 1999 remained at their usual levels and were actually slightly higher than in the previous year.
Po podatkih, ki jih ima Komisija, je izvoz perutnine znotraj Skupnosti v mesecih juniju in avgustu leta 1999 ostal nespremenjen glede na letni trend in se je celo povečal glede na leto 1998.
Intra-Community exports in July were higher than the average for 1999 and than in the corresponding month of the previous year.
Izvoz znotraj Skupnosti je po njihovih podatkih v juliju višji od trenda, zabeleženega za leto 1999 in za julij predhodnega leta.
Although this increase was not enough to absorb all the unsold production declared by the Italian authorities, it mitigated the impact of the crisis on producers, allowing them to sell a part of their production on the Community market.
Čeprav to ne zadostuje za prodajo celotnega presežka neprodanih proizvodov, ki so ga prijavili italijanski organi, je takšno povečanje zmanjšalo vpliv krize na proizvajalce, ker jim je omogočalo, da del proizvodov prodajo na trgu Skupnosti.
The Italian authorities provided no figures to prove the absence of other outlets on the Community market, simply stating that, because of the crisis, the consumption of chicken in all other European countries had also fallen.
Italijanski organi niso predložili nobene številke za potrditev odsotnosti drugih prodajnih možnosti na trgu Skupnosti in so se omejili na trditev, da so zaradi krize tudi druge države zmanjšale porabo piščančjega mesa.
At the same time, they state that certain countries, such as Denmark, Greece, Spain, Ireland, Austria, Portugal, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom, could be taken as reference countries for comparing prices (see recital 7 above) because they were not affected by the crisis.
Vendar bi se lahko po mnenju istih organov za določitev primerljivih cen (prim. odstavek 7 zgoraj) upoštevale nekatere države (kot so Danska, Grčija, Španija, Irska, Avstrija, Portugalska, Finska, Švedska, Združeno kraljestvo), ker jih kriza ni prizadela.
They could therefore have provided an outlet for at least a part of this surplus production.
Zato bi se lahko vsaj del te presežne proizvodnje izvozil v te države.
In addition, in view of the policy of the Commission as regards the application of Article 87(2)(b) of the Treaty in the agricultural sector, any overcompensation of losses must be ruled out.
Razen tega je treba, ob upoštevanju politike, ki jo je sprejela Komisija v zvezi z uporabo člena 87(2)(b) Pogodbe v kmetijskem sektorju, izključiti vsako previsoko nadomestilo za izgube.
The compensation mechanism planned by the Italian authorities is based on aid for meat produced and marketed during June and July 1999, calculated on the basis of the difference between the average price in countries not affected by the crisis and the average price in Italy.
Mehanizem nadomestil, ki so ga predvideli italijanski organi, temelji na pomoči za meso, proizvedeno in trženo v mesecih juniju in juliju 1999, ki je izračunana na podlagi razlike med povprečnimi cenami v državah, ki jih ni prizadela kriza, in povprečnimi cenami v Italiji.
According to the Italian authorities, this difference was EUR 53,966/100 kg in June and EUR 46,218/100 kg in July.
Ta razlika je po mnenju italijanskih organov 53,966 EUR/100 kg za mesec junij in 46,218 EUR/100 kg za mesec julij.
The aid is ITL 21150/100 kg (or EUR 10,92/100 kg) and ITL 15400/100 kg (or EUR 7,95/100 kg.
Pomoč znaša 21150 ITL (ustreza 10,92 EUR)/100 kg in 15400 ITL (7,95 EUR)/100 kg.
This calculation method raises two problems.
Ta metoda izračuna ima dve težavi.
The first concerns the statement by the Italian authorities that farmers had to freeze unsold meat.
Prva zadeva trditev italijanskih organov, da so morali rejci zamrzniti neprodano meso.
This would have allowed poultry products unsold during the crisis to be sold at a later date and losses would have been less than declared during examination of this case.
To bi omogočalo poznejšo prodajo perutninskih proizvodov, ki se niso prodali v obdobju krize, in izguba bi bila bolj omejena od izgube, ki je bila prijavljena med preverjanjem zadeve.
The Italian authorities made no comment on this point.
Italijanski organi niso v zvezi s to točko pripomnili ničesar.
Consequently, the risk of overcompensation for the losses, with a part of production being sold at a later date, probably at normal prices, cannot be ruled out.
Zato ni izključena nevarnost previsokega nadomestila za izgube zaradi preložene prodaje dela proizvodov po verjetno običajnih cenah.
In addition, the Italian authorities declared that 43170,1 tonnes of chickens were slaughtered in June 1999 and 47485,9 tonnes in July, making a total of 90656 tonnes (see letter dated 15 November 2000), while the quantities of meat sold were 34700000 kg in June 1999 and 30200000 kg in July, a total of 64900 tonnes.
Razen tega so italijanski organi izjavili, da je bilo meseca junija 1999 zaklanih piščancev za 43170,1 tone mesa, v juliju pa za 47485,9 tone, skupaj 90656 ton (prim. pismo z dne 15. novembra 2000), medtem ko je bilo v juniju 1999 prodanih 34700000 kg mesa, v juliju pa 30200000 kg, to je 64900 ton.
The quantities frozen in June and July were 4150,8 tonnes and 9271,3 tonnes respectively, making a total of 13422,1 tonnes.
V juniju je bilo zamrznjenih 4150,8 tone mesa, v juliju pa 9271,3 tone, kar je skupaj 13422,1 tone.
No information was provided regarding what was done with the part of production that was not sold or frozen and could therefore have been put to another commercial use.
Italija ni zagotovila nobenih dokazov o tem, kje je del proizvedenega mesa, ki ni bil prodan in zamrznjen in za katerega ni mogoče izključiti porabe v druge tržne namene.
Italy refers to average prices in other European countries not affected by the crisis, without taking into account the fact that prices in Italy were already falling before June 1999 and that prices for poultrymeat vary.
Italija se sklicuje tudi na povprečne cene v drugih evropskih državah, ki jih ni prizadela kriza, pri čemer ne upošteva dejstva, da so cene v Italiji padale že pred junijem 1999, in nihanj v trendih cen za piščančje meso.
The table below shows price trends in Italy in 1998, 1999 and 2000:
Ta trend za leta 1998, 1999 in 2000 v Italiji je prikazan na naslednjem grafu:
Monthly market price of whole chickens
Cena na trgu po mesecih za cele piščance, v
0Jan.
0januar
Feb.
februar
Apr.
april
May
maj
Jun.
junij
Jul.
julij
Aug.
avgust
Oct.
oktober
According to the Italian authorities, the poultrymeat sector was already experiencing overproduction and, consequently, producers decided in March to slaughter a percentage of the chickens they had been intending to slaughter in April and May, the aim being to reduce the supply of meat in June by 4,8 %.
Glede na izjavo italijanskih organov je sektor perutninskega mesa že utrpel prekomerno proizvodnjo in zato so se marca proizvajalci odločili, da pobijejo del piščancev, namenjenih za zakol v aprilu in maju, za znižanje ponudbe mesa v juniju za 4,8 %.
According to the Italian authorities, because of the dioxin crisis, 10 % of production in June was not slaughtered and marketed but rather was kept until July and August, increasing supplies during those two months.
Zaradi dioksinske krize, po mnenju italijanskih organov, 10 % junijske proizvodnje ni šlo v zakol in bilo dane na trg, ampak je bilo to preloženo na meseca julij in avgust, kar je povečalo ponudbo v teh dveh mesecih.
On the basis of the data available to the Commission, the number of chicks being reared increased in February, March and April, leading to an estimated 5,6 % increase in production in June.
Na podlagi podatkov, ki so na voljo Komisiji, se je v februarju, marcu in aprilu število piščancev, danih v vzrejo, dejansko povečalo, zaradi česar se je po ocenah proizvodnja v juniju povečala za 5,6 %.
A comparison of the data for the slaughter of chickens between May and August 1999 with those for the same months of the previous year shows an increase in the number of chickens slaughtered in May 1999, and therefore in the supply of chickens, of almost 9 %; in June 1999, the supply was down 10 % on June 1998 and in July 1999 the number of chicken slaughtered was almost 10 % up on the figure for the same month in 1998.
Podatki, ki se sklicujejo na zakol piščancev v obdobju od maja do avgusta 1999 v primerjavi z istimi meseci predhodnega leta, kažejo, da je bilo v maju 1999 zabeleženo povečanje zakola in tako tudi ponudbe piščancev za skoraj 9 %, da se je v juniju 1999 ponudba glede na junij predhodnega leta zmanjšala za 10 %, v juliju pa je bilo število zaklanih piščancev skoraj za 10 % višje kot v juliju 1998.
This upward trend in supplies continued in August 1999 (+6,5 %).
Trend rasti ponudbe se je nadaljeval v mesecu avgustu 1999 (+6,5 %).
Assuming that prices follow the supply trend, it can be deduced that prices would have fallen from their April level, when they were already lower than the European average because of overproduction.
Glede na to, da cene navadno sledijo gibanju ponudbe, se lahko sklepa, da so se cene zaradi prekomerne proizvodnje v primerjavi z aprilskimi cenami, ki so že bile nižje od evropskega povprečja, znižale.
Consequently, comparing the prices of chickens in Italy in June and July with the average of prices in those countries not affected by the dioxin crisis would lead to an overestimation of the value of chickens in Italy.
Zato bi primerjava med cenami piščancev v Italiji v juniju in juliju ter povprečjem cen v državah, ki jih ni prizadela dioksinska kriza, povzročila previsoko oceno domnevne vrednosti piščancev v Italiji.
Given the variability of prices of chickens in Italy and the downward trend in prices already seen before the dioxin crisis broke, no useful comparison can be made between selling prices in June 1999 and those in June 1998 and any comparison would, in any case, not reflect the overproduction that was already affecting the market for chicken in Italy and the resulting fall in prices already being felt.
Glede na nihanje cen piščancev v Italiji in trend upadanja cen že pred izbruhom dioksinske krize primerjava med prodajnimi cenami v juniju 1999 in juniju 1998 ne bi bila pravilna in ne bi odražala prekomerne proizvodnje, ki je že vplivala na piščančji trg v Italiji, in posledičnega, že zabeleženega znižanja cen.
The statement by the Italian authorities that producers had already taken measures to correct the situation on the market, slaughtering chicks in March that were due to be slaughtered in April and May in order to reduce supplies in June and July, does not tally with the numbers of chicks being reared and, therefore, with estimates for production, which indicate an increase in supplies in June and a small reduction (1,6 %) in July.
Izjava italijanskih organov, da so proizvajalci že sprejeli ukrepe za sanacijo trga z vnaprejšnjim pobojem piščancev, ki bi morali v zakol v aprilu in maju, v mesecu marcu za zmanjšanje ponudbe v mesecih juniju in juliju, je v nasprotju s podatki o številu piščancev za vzrejo in tako z oceno proizvodnje, ki kaže na povečanje ponudbe v mesecu juniju in blago zmanjšanje (1,6 %) v mesecu juliju.
Any attempt to forecast selling prices in June and July 1999 (compared with prices in June 1998 or prices recorded in other European countries not affected by the dioxin crisis) using these figures would be no more than guesswork.
Na podlagi teh elementov je vsako napovedovanje prodajnih cen za junij in julij 1999 (v primerjavi s cenami junija 1998 ali cenami, zabeleženimi v evropskih državah, ki jih ni prizadela dioksinska kriza) tvegano.
Consequently, the Commission can conclude that, since consumer alarm does not in itself constitute an exceptional occurrence within the meaning of Article 87(2)(b) of the Treaty and that the method of calculating losses proposed by the Italian authorities could lead to an overestimate of the losses suffered by Italian poultrymeat producers, the measure cannot be considered to be compatible with the common market under Article 87(2)(b).
Komisija lahko zato sklene, da se ukrep, ob upoštevanju dejstva, da družbeni preplah sam po sebi ne pomeni izrednega položaja v smislu člena 87(2)(b) Pogodbe in da lahko metoda za izračun izgub, ki so jo predlagali italijanski organi, povzroči previsoko oceno izgub, ki so jih utrpeli proizvajalci piščančjega mesa v Italiji, ne more obravnavati kot združljiv s skupnim trgom na podlagi člena 87(2)(b).
Even if the aid is examined in the light of Article 87(3) of the Treaty, the only conclusion that can be reached is that it is incompatible with the common market.
Tudi s preverjanjem pomoči v skladu s členom 87(3) Pogodbe ni mogoče priti do sklepa, da je ta združljiva s skupnim trgom.
Article 87(3)(a) does not apply, because the aid is not intended to promote the economic development of areas where the standard of living is abnormally low or where there is serious underemployment.
Prav tako se ne uporablja člen 87(3)(a), ker pomoč ni namenjena za spodbujanje gospodarskega razvoja regij, kjer je življenjski standard neobičajno nizek ali kjer prevladuje huda oblika podzaposlenosti.
As regards Article 87(3)(b), the aid is not intended to promote the execution of an important project of common European interest or to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State.
Kar zadeva člen 87(3)(b), zadevna pomoč ni namenjena spodbujanju uresničevanja pomembnega projekta skupnega evropskega interesa ali odpravljanju resne motnje v gospodarstvu države članice.
As regards Article 87(3)(d) of the Treaty, the aid is not intended to achieve the objectives laid down in that subparagraph.
V skladu s členom 87(3)(d) Pogodbe zadevna pomoč ne velja za cilje, navedene v njem.