natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
All Parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of persulphates originating in the USA, the PRC and Taiwan and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of the provisional duty.
Vse stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih naj bi priporočila uvedbo dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz persulfatov s poreklom iz ZDA, LRK in Tajvana ter dokončno pobiranje zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo.
The Commission intensified the investigation with regard to Community interest aspects and carried out analysis of data within the questionnaire reply provided by a user in the Community after the imposition of the provisional anti-dumping measures.
Komisija je z upoštevanjem interesa Skupnosti poglobila preiskavo in izvedla analizo podatkov iz vprašalnikov, ki jih je po uvedbi začasnih protidampinških ukrepov izpolnil uporabnik v Skupnosti.
One additional verification visit was carried out at the premises of the following company:
Dodatni preveritveni obisk je bil opravljen v prostorih naslednje družbe:
Antec International Ltd, Sudbury, UK — user in the Community.
Antec International Ltd., Sudbury, UK – uporabnik v Skupnosti.
The oral and written comments submitted by the Parties were considered and, where appropriate, the findings have been modified accordingly.
Po preučitvi ustnih in pisnih pripomb, ki so jih predložile stranke, so bile ugotovitve po potrebi ustrezno spremenjene.
It is recalled that as mentioned in recital 14 of the provisional Regulation the product concerned consists of the following four main product types: ammonium persulphate (NH4)2S2O8 (APS), sodium persulphate (Na2S2O8) (SPS/NPS), potassium persulphate (K2S2O8) (PPS/KPS) and potassium monopersulphate (2KHSO5 * KHSO4 * K2SO4) (KMPS).
Treba je opozoriti, da je v uvodni izjavi 14 začasne uredbe navedeno, da zadevni izdelek sestoji iz naslednjih glavnih štirih vrst izdelkov: amonijevega persulfata (NH4)2S2O8 (APS), natrijevega persulfata (Na2S2O8) (SPS/NPS), kalijevega persulfata (K2S2O8) (PPS/KPS) in kalijevega monopersulfata (2KHSO5 * KHSO4 * K2SO4) (KMPS).
One exporting producer in the USA reiterated its claim to exclude KMPS from the scope of the investigation on the grounds that KMPS had different chemical characteristics and was used in applications which differed from those of the other three product types.
En proizvajalec izvoznik v ZDA je ponovil svoj zahtevek po izključitvi KMPS iz preiskave, ker ima KMPS drugačne kemijske lastnosti in različne uporabe kot druge tri vrste izdelka.
This exporting producer claimed that the interchangeability of all product types was limited to some niche applications.
Navedeni izvoznik proizvajalec je trdil, da je bila zamenljivost vseh vrst izdelka omejena na nekatere nišne uporabe.
Thus, only a very small quantity of its exports of KMPS to the Community would be used in typical applications of the three remaining product types.
Zato bi se pri značilnih uporabah ostalih treh vrst izdelka uporabljala samo majhna količina njegovega izvoza KMPS v Skupnost.
To support its claim, the exporting producer reiterated that KMPS was sold at constantly higher price levels which showed that it would be sold to types of customers for applications which differed from those of the remaining three product types.
Da bi izvoznik proizvajalec potrdil svojo trditev, je ponovno poudaril, da se je KMPS stalno prodajal po višjih cenah, kar kaže, da bi bil prodan različnim uporabnikom za drugačne uporabe kot ostale tri vrste izdelka.
The same exporting producer also referred to Council Regulation (EC) No 2961/95 [3] which imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of peroxodisulphates originating in the PRC.
Isti proizvajalec izvoznik se je skliceval na uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2961/95 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz peroksidisulfatov s poreklom iz LRK [3].
Since the product concerned by that investigation did not include KMPS, it was claimed that the provisional findings in the current investigation contradicted the findings in that prior investigation.
Trdil je, da zadevni izdelek v navedeni preiskavi ni vključeval KMPS, zato so začasne ugotovitve sedanje preiskave v nasprotju z ugotovitvami predhodne preiskave.
In particular, the criteria listed in recital 7 of Regulation (EC) No 2961/95 to determine the product concerned would not apply to KMPS, which would show that it is a different product.
Predvsem se merila za določitev zadevnega izdelka iz uvodne izjave 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 2961/95 ne bi mogla uporabljati za KMPS, kar kaže, da gre za različen izdelek.
This exporting producer referred further to an anti-dumping investigation conducted by the authorities of the USA covering persulphates but not KMPS [4].
Navedeni proizvajalec izvoznik se je nadalje skliceval na protidampinško preiskavo, ki so jo izvedli organi ZDA in je zajemala persulfate, vendar ne KMPS [4].
Subsequent to the provisional disclosure, the same exporting producer also claimed that KMPS was treated differently from the other types for transport purposes as well as in Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 February 1998 concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market [5] (the Biocide directive).
Poleg tega je po začasnem razkritju navedeni proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da je KMPS v zvezi s prevozom in v Direktivi 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 1998 o dajanju biocidnih pripravkov v promet („Direktiva o biocidih“) [5] obravnavan drugače, kot druge vrste izdelkov.
This different treatment would indicate that they are different products.
Takšna različna obravnava pomeni, da gre za različna izdelka.
Finally, the abovementioned exporting producer argued that the only common criterion of KMPS and the other three product types was that they are ‘strong oxidants’, which is a broad definition applying to many other chemicals such as hydrogen peroxide and sodium hypochlorite which were also used as oxidising agents.
Nazadnje je navedeni proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da je edino skupno merilo KMPS in ostalih treh vrst izdelka, da so „močni oksidanti“, kar je splošna opredelitev, ki se uporablja za številne druge kemikalije, kot sta vodikov peroksid in natrijev hipoklorit, ki se prav tako uporabljata kot oksidanta.
Therefore, either KMPS should be excluded from the present product scope or other oxidising agents should be included.
Zato je treba bodisi KMPS izključiti iz sedanjega obsega izdelka bodisi vključiti še ostala sredstva za oksidiranje.
As far as the alleged differences in chemical characteristics are concerned, the abovementioned exporting producer did not bring forward any new information or evidence but mainly repeated the arguments it made prior to the imposition of provisional measures.
Glede domnevnih razlik v kemijskih lastnostih zgoraj navedeni proizvajalec izvoznik ni navedel nobenih novih informacij ali dokazov, pač pa samo ponovil svoje utemeljitve iz časa pred uvedbo začasnih ukrepov.
It is underlined that recital 17 of the provisional Regulation recognises that each type, including KMPS, has a different chemical formula.
Poudariti je treba, da uvodna izjava 17 začasne uredbe navaja, da ima vsaka vrsta, vključno s KMPS, drugačno kemijsko formulo.
However, it was also found that, despite these differences, all types have a common structure (SO3-O2) and similar or comparable physical and chemical properties.
Vendar je bilo tudi ugotovljeno, da imajo kljub tem razlikam vse vrste skupno strukturo (SO3-O2) in podobne ali primerljive fizikalne in kemijske lastnosti.
Thus, all types have, for example, a comparable appearance (white, crystalline salt), a similar bulk density and comparable active oxygen content.
Tako imajo vse vrste na primer primerljiv videz (bela, kristalizirana sol), podobno specifično maso in primerljivo vsebnost aktivnega kisika.
All types were defined as salts of oxoacids of sulphur in the oxidation state number VI which measures the degree of oxidation of an atom in a substance.
Vse vrste so bile opredeljene kot soli oksokislin žvepla z oksidacijskim stanjem VI, ki pove, kakšna je stopnja oksidacije atoma v snovi.
It was therefore concluded that all product types had similar chemical characteristics.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da imajo vse vrste izdelka podobne kemijske lastnosti.
None of the information put forward by the exporting producer concerned was such as to change these findings.
Nobena informacija, ki jo je predložil zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik, ni spremenila navedenih ugotovitev.
The above characteristics were found to be unique to persulphates which differentiated them from other products.
Za zgornje lastnosti je bilo ugotovljeno, da so značilne za persulfate, kar jih razlikuje od drugih izdelkov.
In particular, the investigation revealed that hydrogen peroxide is a colourless liquid with a chemical formula different from that of persulphates (H2O2).
S preiskavo je bilo ugotovljeno predvsem, da je vodikov peroksid brezbarvna tekočina, ki ima drugačno kemijsko formulo kot eden od persulfatov (H2O2).
It does not contain any sulphur and its active oxidant content is around 10 times higher than the one of the product concerned.
Ne vsebuje žvepla, vsebnost njenega aktivnega oksidanta pa je približno 10 krat večja od vsebnosti v zadevnem izdelku.
Hydrogen peroxide is moreover used in different applications to persulphates.
Poleg tega ima vodikov peroksid drugačna področja uporabe kot persulfati.
Likewise, sodium hypochlorite has a chemical structure which is different from the product concerned (NA+OCl–) and does not contain any oxygen/oxygen bond or any sulphur.
Tudi natrijev hipoklorit ima drugačno kemijsko strukturo kot zadevni izdelek (NA+OCl–) in ne vsebuje kisik/kisik ali žveplove vezi.
NA+OCl– is a solid compound, but usually commercially available as an aqueous solution.
NA+OCl– je v trdnem stanju, vendar je na trgu običajno dosegljiv v obliki vodne raztopine.
Since it has no active oxygen content at all, it is used in chlorine-based bleaching.
Ker sploh ne vsebuje aktivnega kisika, se uporablja pri beljenju na osnovi klora.
It was therefore concluded that the aforementioned products had different properties and applications and were not comparable to persulphates.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da imajo prej navedeni izdelki različne lastnosti in uporabo ter niso primerljivi s persulfati.
The argument that the product definition was too broad was therefore rejected.
Utemeljitev, da je bila opredelitev izdelka preširoka, je bila zato zavrnjena.
Regarding the claim that KMPS had end uses that differed significantly from those of the remaining three product types, the arguments brought forward before the imposition of provisional measures were mainly repeated.
Trditev, da ima KMPS bistveno drugačno končno uporabo kot ostale tri vrste izdelka, je v glavnem ponovitev utemeljitev iz časa pred uvedbo začasnih ukrepov.
The exporting producer claimed in particular that KMPS would be largely used in the cleaning and disinfection of swimming pools, whereas other persulphates could allegedly not be used because they were skin-irritant.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je predvsem trdil, da naj bi se KMPS uporabljal predvsem pri čiščenju in dezinfekciji kopalnih bazenov, medtem ko se ostalih persulfatov zaradi domnevnega draženja kože ne bi smelo uporabljati.
It was found, however, that not only KMPS but also other persulphate types were allowed by the relevant European standard to be used in the treatment of water intended for human consumption [6].
Vendar je bilo ugotovljeno, da ustrezni evropski standardi za uporabo obdelave vode, namenjene za človeško uporabo, dovoljujejo poleg KMPS tudi ostale vrste persulfatov [6].
It was also found that whether or not they were a skin irritant, other persulphate types were indeed used in cleaning and disinfection applications.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da se ostali persulfati uporabljajo pri čiščenju in dezinfekciji ne glede draženje kože.
This argument had therefore to be rejected.
To utemeljitev je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
The abovementioned exporting producer claimed further that KMPS cannot be used in polymerisation processes which are the main field of application of the other persulphate types.
Navedeni proizvajalec izvoznik je poleg tega trdil, da se KMPS ne more uporabljati v postopkih polimerizacije, ki so glavno področje uporabe ostalih vrst persulfatov.
However, the investigation revealed that KMPS could be used in polymerisation processes and consequently this argument had also to be rejected.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da se KMPS lahko uporablja v postopkih polimerizacije, zaradi česar je bilo treba to utemeljitev prav tako zavrniti.
Finally, as mentioned in recital 17 of the provisional Regulation, despite partly distinct end uses, a number of overlapping applications existed such as metal treatment (micro-etching and pickling) and repulping of wet-strength paper.
Kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 17 začasne uredbe, so kljub delno različnim končnim uporabam obstajale številne prekrivajoče se uporabe, kot so obdelava kovin (mikro jedkanje in dekapiranje) ter recikliranje mokromočnih papirjev.
It was therefore concluded that all product types had largely overlapping applications with no clear dividing lines.
Zato je bil sklenjeno, da imajo vse vrste izdelka zelo prekrivajoče se uporabe brez jasnih ločnic.
As mentioned in recital 9, the exporting producer concerned argued that, while there was a certain overlap in applications, this did not concern a substantial part of its export sales and should therefore be considered as insignificant.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 9, je proizvajalec izvoznik trdil da sicer obstaja določeno prekrivanje uporab, vendar to ne zadeva znatnega dela njegovega izvoza, zato ga je treba šteti za zanemarljivega.
In this regard, it should be noted that the precise consumption of each product type in a specific application during the IP could not be determined because of the low co-operation of the users concerned and the unavailability of appropriate data for such determination.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da med OP zaradi slabega sodelovanja zadevnih uporabnikov in nedostopnosti ustreznih podatkov ni bilo mogoče določiti natančne potrošnje za vsako vrsto izdelka glede na njegovo posebno uporabo.
The exporting producer concerned did not submit conclusive evidence in this respect, but only unsupported estimates.
Zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik v zvezi s tem ni predložil zadostnih dokazov, ampak samo nepodprte ocene.
Furthermore, only two users cooperated in the present investigation, representing only a small part of total consumption (7 %).
Poleg tega sta v sedanji preiskavi sodelovala samo dva uporabnika, ki predstavljata manjši del celotne potrošnje (7 %).
In any event, the exact extent to which a specific product type was used in a specific application during a specific time period was considered irrelevant.
V vsakem primeru je natančen obseg uporabe za določene namene v določenem obdobju nepomemben.
Indeed, whether a certain product type can be used in a specific application has to be determined on the basis of the physical, technical and chemical characteristics.
Ali je lahko določena vrsta izdelka namenjena za posebno uporabo, je treba določiti na podlagi fizikalnih, tehničnih in kemijskih lastnosti.
Users may use a certain product type at a certain time but may also be able to switch easily from one product type to the other for one and the same application.
Uporabniki lahko v določenem času uporabljajo določeno vrsto izdelka, vendar jo lahko za enako uporabo preprosto zamenjajo za drugo.
As regards the different price levels of the different product types, it is already set out in recital 17 of the provisional Regulation that it is considered that price differences between product types per se do not justify the conclusion that a certain product type should be considered as a different product.
V zvezi z različnimi ravnmi cen različnih vrst izdelkov je že v uvodni izjavi 17 začasne uredbe določeno, da razlike v ravni cen med vrstami izdelkov per se ne upravičujejo sklepne ugotovitve, da je treba posamezno vrsto izdelka šteti za različen izdelek.
While it is true that sales prices of KMPS are higher than the ones of other types of persulphates, there are also price differences between the remaining three product types.
Čeprav je res, da so prodajne cene KMPS višje kot cene drugih persulfatov, pa obstajajo tudi razlike v ceni med ostalimi tremi vrstami izdelka.
It should be noted that these differences can be seen in all producing countries, including the Community.
Treba je opozoriti, da so navedene razlike vidne v vseh državah proizvajalkah, vključno s Skupnostjo.
The different price levels are mainly explained by the limited number of producers of KMPS worldwide (in the Community, the USA and, to a certain extent, the PRC) and are not necessarily reflected in the cost of production.
Različne ravni cen se lahko v glavnem pojasnijo z omejenim številom proizvajalcev KMPS po vsem svetu (v Skupnosti, ZDA in delno v LRK) in niso nujno odraz proizvodnih stroškov.
Consequently and given the above findings that no clear dividing lines existed between different applications of the different product types, this claim had also to be rejected.
Zato, in ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenih ugotovitev o nejasnih ločnicah med različnimi uporabami različnih vrst izdelka, je bilo treba zavrniti tudi to trditev.
As far as the different treatment of KMPS and the other three product types with regard to packing for transport and under the Biocide Directive is concerned, it should be noted that these were new arguments provided after the imposition of the provisional measures and therefore outside the required deadlines.
Opozoriti je treba, da so bile utemeljitve glede različne obravnave KMPS in ostalih treh vrst izdelka v zvezi s pakiranjem za prevoz in v skladu z Direktivo o biocidih predložene po preteku zahtevanih rokov, tj. po uvedbi zaščitnih ukrepov.
In any event, the investigation has shown that packing standards for all types were basically the same, albeit under different classifications.
V vsakem primeru pa je preiskava pokazala, da so standardi pakiranja za vse vrste dejansko enaki, vendar v skladu z različnimi uvrstitvami.
It was also considered that packing standards as such were not a decisive criterion in determining whether different product types were one single product.
Poleg tega standardi pakiranja kot taki niso bili odločilno merilo za odločitev, ali so različne vrste izdelka dejansko en sam izdelek.
As described above, the main criteria to define the product concerned in an anti-dumping investigation are their basic chemical, technical and physical characteristics and end uses.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, so glavna merila za opredelitev zadevnega izdelka v protidampinški preiskavi njegove osnovne kemijske, tehnične in fizikalne lastnosti ter končne uporabe.
As far as the Biocide Directive is concerned, it is noted that the different treatment lies in the fact that the Community industry initiated the registration procedures required under this Directive for KMPS but not for the other three product types.
V zvezi z direktivo o biocidih je treba opozoriti, da različna obravnava izhaja iz dejstva, da je industrija Skupnosti začela postopke registracije, ki jih navedena direktiva zahteva za KMPS, ne pa tudi za ostale tri vrste izdelka.
Registration procedures had not been started for these other types due to considerations unrelated to their chemical characteristics and end uses, as claimed by the exporting producer concerned.
V nasprotju s trditvijo zadevnega proizvajalca izvoznika postopki registracije za ostale tri vrste niso bili začeti zaradi premislekov, ki niso bili povezani z njihovimi kemijskimi lastnostmi in končnimi uporabami.
Thus, while for the product type KMPS registration costs were shared between the two main producers of this product type (one in the Community and the other one in the USA), registration procedures were considered very costly and time-consuming, and could be more efficiently handled in terms of cost and time in the wider context the new European Chemicals Regulation (REACH) which entered into force on 1 June 2007 [7].
Stroške registracije za KMPS sta si delila dva glavna proizvajalca tega izdelka (eden v Skupnosti in drugi v ZDA), vendar pa so bili postopki registracije dragi in zamudni ter bi se lahko ceneje in učinkoviteje izvedli v širšem okviru nove evropske uredbe o kemikalijah (REACH), ki je začela veljati 1. junija 2007 [7].
The different treatment under the Biocide Directive can therefore not be considered as an indication that the product types were different on the basis of their chemical properties and/or applications.
Zato različne obravnave v skladu z direktivo o biocidih ni mogoče šteti za dokaz različnosti vrst izdelkov na podlagi njihovih kemijskih lastnosti in/ali uporab.
It was therefore considered irrelevant in the definition of the product concerned and the exporting producer's claim in this regard was rejected.
Zato različna obravnava pri opredelitvi izdelka ni bila pomembna, trditev proizvajalca izvoznika v zvezi s tem pa je bila zavrnjena.
As far as the findings with regard to the product concerned in the investigations mentioned in recital 10 are concerned, it should be noted that in none of these investigations was KMPS expressively excluded, i.e. there are no findings which would have established that KMPS and the other three product types had different chemical characteristics and end uses and should therefore not be considered as one single product.
Glede ugotovitev preiskav v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom, navedenih v uvodni izjavi 10, je treba opozoriti, da KMPS v nobeni od teh preiskav ni bil izrecno izključen, tj. nobenih ugotovitev ni, ki bi potrjevale, da so imeli KMPS in ostale tri vrste izdelkov različne kemijske lastnosti in končne uporabe ter se jih zato ne bi moglo šteti za en izdelek.
KMPS was not included in the above complaints (or petitions as applicable) either because it was not exported during the IP of that investigation (Community) or because the domestic complaining industry (USA) did not produce KMPS at that time.
KMPS ni bil vključen v navedenih pritožbah (ali peticijah, če ustreza), ker se ga med OP navedene preiskave (Skupnost) bodisi ni izvažalo bodisi ga domača industrija, ki pritožbo vlaga (ZDA), v tem času ni proizvajala.
It is in particular noted that the criteria listed in recital 7 of Regulation (EC) No 2961/95 (imposing definitive measures on imports of peroxodisulphates from the PRC) did not aim at differentiating between KMPS on the one hand and the three other product types on the other hand, but rather at defining the main characteristics shared by the three types which formed the product concerned in that investigation.
Posebej je treba opozoriti, da merila, navedena v uvodni izjavi 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 2961/95 (o uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov na uvoz peroksidisulfatov s poreklom iz LRK), niso namenjena razlikovanju med KMPS na eni strani in ostalimi tremi vrstami izdelka na drugi strani, ampak opredeljujejo glavne skupne lastnosti vseh treh vrst, ki so zadevni izdelek v preiskavi.
They are therefore tailored to the three product types concerned and not exhaustive.
Zato so prirejena za tri vrste zadevnega izdelka in niso izčrpna.
The main findings, however, also apply to KMPS, i.e. that the essential characteristics (persulphate anion) and end uses (initiator and oxidising agent) are the same, that they are interchangeable to a certain extent and that price differences are considered irrelevant.
Vendar se glavne ugotovitve uporabljajo tudi za KMPS, tj., da so osnovne lastnosti (anion persulfata) ter končne uporabe (iniciator in sredstvo za oksidiranje) enake, da so do določene mere zamenljive ter da razlike v ceni niso pomembne.