natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The regulations proposed in the draft act permit minimisation of the risk associated with the mixing of reproductive material or crossing of genetically modified plants with unmodified plants, and make it possible to inspect genetically modified crops.
Predpisi iz osnutka akta dovoljujejo zmanjševanje tveganja, povezanega z mešanjem reprodukcijskega materiala ali križanja gensko spremenjenih rastlin z nespremenjenimi rastlinami ter omogočajo nadzorovanje gensko spremenjenih pridelkov.
A ground for the introduction of derogations in the national provisions as regards the restriction of the cultivation of transgenic plants, is the need to fulfil the expectations of Polish society.
Odstopanja v zvezi z omejevanjem gojenja transgenih rastlin so se v nacionalne določbe uvedla zaradi potrebe po izpolnitvi pričakovanj poljske družbe.
Provisions restricting the cultivation of GM plants have the purpose of preventing the possible damage which may result should transgenes cross over into conventional crops.
Določbe, ki omejujejo gojenje gensko spremenjenih rastlin, so namenjene preprečevanju mogoče škode, ki bi jo lahko povzročili transgeni pri križanju s konvencionalnimi rastlinami.
Concerns relating to the cultivation of GM plants are associated mainly with the impossibility of eliminating the risk of contamination of crops due to possible crossing.
Zaskrbljenost v zvezi z gojenjem gensko spremenjenih rastlin je večinoma povezana z nezmožnostjo odprave tveganja kontaminacije rastlin zaradi mogočega križanja.
This results from the fact that Polish agriculture is fragmented to a very high degree.
To izhaja iz dejstva, da je poljsko kmetijstvo zelo razdrobljeno.
Poland has almost two million farms, and the average area of a farm is less than 8 ha.
Na Poljskem je skoraj dva milijona kmetij, njihova povprečna površina pa je manjša kot 8 ha.
Polish agriculture is characterised by a conventional production system, and there is also increasing interest in organic production.
Za poljsko kmetijstvo je značilen konvencionalen sistem proizvodnje, vendar se vedno več ljudi zanima za ekološko pridelavo.
Given this high level of fragmentation, it is not possible to isolate GM crops from conventional and organic crops, and this may also pose a serious threat to Poland’s developing organic farming.
Glede na visoko raven razdrobljenosti ni mogoče ločiti gensko spremenjenih pridelkov od konvencionalnih in organskih pridelkov, to pa lahko resno ogrozi razvijajoče se ekološko kmetijstvo na Poljskem.
In this situation, the uncontrolled introduction of transgenic plants into cultivation may inflict losses on farmers.
V teh razmerah lahko nenadzorovano uvajanje gojenja transgenih rastlin kmetom povzroči izgubo.
The reluctance of Polish farmers is also increased by the absence of provisions on compensation for agricultural losses resulting from the uncontrolled crossing of varieties.
Nasprotovanje poljskih kmetov se povečuje tudi zaradi odsotnosti določb o nadomestilu za izgube v kmetijstvu, ki ga je povzročilo nenadzorovano križanje sort.
At present, there are no national provisions relating to the coexistence of the three forms of agriculture — conventional, organic and using transgenic plants — the draft provisions are the first attempt to regulate this matter.
Zdaj še ni nacionalnih določb v zvezi s soobstojem treh oblik kmetijstva – konvencionalnega, ekološkega in kmetijstva, pri katerem se uporabljajo transgene rastline – osnutki določb so prvi poskus za urejanje tega področja.
Article 95(5) of the EC Treaty applies to new national measures, which introduce incompatible requirements with those of a Community harmonisation measure on the basis of the protection of the environment or the working environment, on grounds of a problem specific to that Member State arising after the adoption of the harmonisation measure, and which are justified by new scientific evidence.
Člen 95(5) Pogodbe ES se uporablja za nove nacionalne ukrepe, ki uvajajo zahteve, ki niso združljive z zahtevami usklajevalnega ukrepa Skupnosti glede varstva okolja ali delovnega okolja zaradi problema, ki je specifičen za zadevno državo članico in je posledica sprejetja usklajevalnega ukrepa, ter zahteve, ki jih upravičujejo nova znanstvena spoznanja.
Furthermore, under Article 95(6) of the EC Treaty, the Commission is either to approve or reject the draft national provisions in question after verifying whether or not they are a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States, and whether or not they shall constitute an obstacle to the functioning of the internal market.
Poleg tega mora Komisija v skladu s členom 95(6) Pogodbe ES odobriti ali zavrniti zadevne osnutke nacionalnih določb, potem ko preveri, ali so morda sredstvo samovoljne diskriminacije ali prikrita omejitev trgovine med državami članicami in ali ovirajo delovanje notranjega trga.
The notification submitted by the Polish authorities on 13 April 2007 is intended to obtain approval for the introduction of the new Article 111(2) points 5 and 6 and Article 172 of the Act which Poland considers to be a derogation to Directive 2001/18/EC.
Uradno obvestilo, ki so ga poljski organi predložili 13. aprila 2007, je namenjeno pridobitvi odobritve za uvedbo novega člena 111(2)(5) in (6) ter člena 172 akta, za katerega Poljska meni, da odstopa od Direktive 2001/18/ES.
Poland submitted this notification as derogation to Directive 2001/18/EC only.
Poljska je predložila to uradno obvestilo le kot odstopanje od Direktive 2001/18/ES.
Therefore, the legal assessment contained in this Decision will focus only on Directive 2001/18/EC.
Zato se bo pravna ocena iz te odločbe osredotočila samo na Direktivo 2001/18/ES.
Directive 2001/18/EC harmonises at Community level the rules with regards to the deliberate release of GMOs, for experimental release or for placing on the market.
Direktiva 2001/18/ES na ravni Skupnosti usklajuje pravila v zvezi z namernim sproščanjem GSO zaradi poskusnega sproščanja ali dajanja v promet.
This horizontal piece of legislation can be seen as the cornerstone of any deliberate release into the environment of GMOs in the European Union, notably since authorisations in accordance with the legislation for genetically modified food and feed (Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003) are carried out also in line with its governing principles.
Ta horizontalna zakonodaja se lahko obravnava kot temelj vsakega namernega sproščanja GSO v okolje v Evropski uniji, zlasti ker se odobritve v skladu z zakonodajo za gensko spremenjena živila in krmo (Uredba (ES) št. 1829/2003) izvajajo na podlagi njenih temeljnih načel.
When comparing the provisions of Directive 2001/18/EC and the national measures notified, it emerges that the latter are more restrictive than those contained in the Directive, notably in the following aspects:
Pri primerjavi določb iz Direktive 2001/18/ES in priglašenih nacionalnih ukrepov je razvidno, da so ti bolj omejevalni kot tisti iz direktive, zlasti pri naslednjih vidikih:
in accordance with the provisions of Part B of the Directive 2001/18/EC, experimental releases of GMOs are not subject to the consent of any third parties (such as neighbouring farmers, as stipulated by the Polish draft Act) and any authorities other than the Competent Authorities designated under Article 4(4) of the Directive (such as local municipalities, as stipulated by the Polish draft Act),
v skladu z določbami iz dela B Direktive 2001/18/ES za poskusno sproščanje GSO ni potrebno soglasje tretjih strani (npr. sosednjih kmetij, kot je določeno v osnutku poljskega akta) in nobenih organov, razen pristojnih organov iz člena 4(4) Direktive (npr. lokalnih občinskih uprav, kot je določeno v osnutku poljskega akta),
Directive 2001/18/EC, enables free circulation of genetically modified seeds approved at Community.
Direktiva 2001/18/ES omogoča prosti promet gensko spremenjenih semen, odobrenih na ravni Skupnosti.
Articles 13-18 of the Directive establish an authorisation procedure which includes the assessment of each individual notification for GMO(s) by the competent authorities and, under circumstances, the authorisation through the Committee procedure of Articles 5 and 7 of Council Decision 1999/468/EC [10].
Členi 13–18 Direktive določajo postopek odobritve, ki vključuje oceno vsakega uradnega obvestila o GSO s strani pristojnih organov in v določenih okoliščinah odobritev s postopkom v odborih iz členov 5 in 7 Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES [10].
In view of the above, if a GMO receives a consent for cultivation in the EU under the procedure provided for by Directive 2001/18/EC, Member States cannot introduce any additional restrictions to its cultivation.
Glede na navedeno države članice ne morejo uvesti dodatnih omejitev za gojenje GSO v EU, če je bilo odobreno v skladu s postopkom iz Direktive 2001/18/ES.
However the Polish Act prohibits their cultivation unless designated in specific zones, even if no such restriction is established by the written consent given under the Directive.
Vendar poljski akt prepoveduje gojenje GSO, razen na določenih območjih, tudi če ni bila določena omejitev s pisno odobritvijo v skladu z Direktivo.
Directive 2001/18/EC is affected, in so far as the draft act restricts the cultivation of all GMOs in Poland, whereas the Directive (Articles 13-18) foresees a procedure providing at a EC level a case-by-case risk analysis prior to the authorisation of the placing on the market of a GMO.
V Direktivo 2001/18/ES se posega, če osnutek akta omejuje gojenje GSO na Poljskem, medtem ko Direktiva (členi 13–18) določa postopek, na podlagi katerega se na ravni Evropske skupnosti za vsak primer posebej izvede analiza tveganja pred odobritvijo dajanja v promet GSO.
The proposed restrictions of the cultivation of genetically modified seeds in Poland also create an obstacle to the placing on the market of genetically modified seeds that would have been authorised for this purpose under Directive 2001/18/EC.
Predlagane omejitve gojenja gensko spremenjenih semen na Poljskem ovirajo tudi dajanje v promet gensko spremenjenih semen, ki bi bila za ta namen odobrena v skladu z Direktivo 2001/18/ES.
The draft Act would, therefore, have implications for genetically modified seeds already approved for the placing on the market under existing Community legislation as well as future approvals.
Osnutek akta bi zato vplival na gensko spremenjena semena, ki so že odobrena za dajanje v promet v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo Skupnosti, in prihodnje odobritve.
Article 111(2)(5, 6) of the draft Polish Act seeks to restrict the cultivation of genetically modified seeds for experimental releases.
Člen 111(2)(5) in (6) osnutka poljskega akta je namenjen omejevanju gojenja gensko spremenjenih semen za poskusno sproščanje.
Experimental releases of genetically modified seeds are regulated under Directive 2001/18/EC although at a national rather than Community level.
Poskusno sproščanje gensko spremenjenih semen je urejeno v skladu z Direktivo 2001/18/ES, vendar na nacionalni ravni in ne na ravni Skupnosti.
In accordance with Article 6(1) of the Directive (Standard authorisation procedure), the notification for each experimental release of GMOs is submitted to the Competent Authority of the Member State within whose territory the release is to take place.
V skladu s členom 6(1) Direktive („Standardni postopek odobritve“) je treba za vsako poskusno sproščanje GSO predložiti prijavo pristojnemu organu države članice, na ozemlju katere se bo izvajalo sproščanje.
In accordance with Article 6(8), the notifier may proceed with the release only when he has received the written consent of the competent authority, and in conformity with any conditions required in the consent.
V skladu s členom 6(8) lahko prijavitelj prične s sproščanjem samo, ko prejme pisno odobritev pristojnega organa, in le pod pogoji, zahtevanimi v tej odobritvi.
Therefore, the provisions of the notified draft Act which establish additional administrative requirements for the authorisation of such releases, such as mayors’ certifications and written declarations for the neighboring farmers that they do not object to the releases, irrespective of any potential risk, have to be considered in contradiction with the Directive.
Zato je treba obravnavati, da so določbe priglašenega osnutka akta, ki uvajajo dodatne upravne zahteve za odobritev takšnega sproščanja, kot so potrdila županov in pisne izjave sosednjih kmetov, da ne nasprotujejo sproščanju ne glede na mogoče tveganje, v nasprotju z Direktivo.
Article 172(1) prohibits the cultivation of genetically modified plants, subject to the provisions of paragraph 2, namely the designation of specific zones by the Ministry of Agriculture.
Člen 172(1) prepoveduje gojenje gensko spremenjenih rastlin na podlagi določb iz odstavka 2, in sicer določitev posebnih območij s strani ministrstva za kmetijstvo.
This general ban is in breach of Article 19 of Directive 2001/18/EC, which stipulates that if a written consent has been given for the placing on the market of a GMO as or in a product, that product may be used without further notification throughout the Community in so far as the specific conditions of use and the environments and/or geographical areas stipulated in these conditions are strictly adhered to.
Ta splošna prepoved krši člen 19 Direktive 2001/18/ES, ki določa, da se lahko, če je bila dana pisna odobritev za dajanje v promet GSO kot proizvoda ali v proizvodu, ta proizvod brez nadaljnje prijave uporablja v vsej Skupnosti, če se dosledno upoštevajo posebni pogoji uporabe ter okolja in/ali zemljepisna območja, določena v teh pogojih.
Furthermore, the general ban of the draft Polish Act is in breach of Article 22 of the Directive, which stipulates that Member States may not prohibit, restrict or impede the placing on the market of GMOs, as or in products, which comply with the requirements of this Directive.
Poleg tega splošna prepoved iz osnutka poljskega akta krši člen 22 Direktive, ki določa, da države članice ne smejo prepovedati, omejiti ali preprečiti dajanja v promet GSO kot proizvodov ali v proizvodih, kadar izpolnjujejo zahteve te direktive.
Finally, in accordance with Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC, if on the basis of new information, made available since the date of consent, a Member State has detailed grounds for considering that a GMO as or in a product which has been properly notified and has received written consent under Directive 2001/18/EC constitutes a risk to human health or the environment, that Member State may provisionally restrict or prohibit the use and/or sale of that GMO as or in a product on its territory.
Končno velja v skladu s členom 23 Direktive 2001/18/ES, da lahko ima država članica kot rezultat novih informacij, ki so postale razpoložljive po datumu odobritve, podrobne razloge za domnevo, da GSO kot proizvod ali v proizvodu, ki je bil pravilno prijavljen in je prejel pisno odobritev v skladu z Direktivo 2001/18/ES, predstavlja tveganje za zdravje ljudi ali okolje, zato lahko ta država članica začasno omeji ali prepove uporabo in/ali prodajo tega GSO kot proizvoda ali v proizvodu na svojem ozemlju.
This provision indicates that the cultivation of a GMO can be prohibited only on a case-by-case basis and upon particular conditions (new information made available since the date of consent), without providing the basis to any Member State to adopt a general ban of the cultivation or any other use of GMOs.
Ta določba navaja, da se lahko gojenje GSO prepove le za vsak primer posebej in pod določenimi pogoji (na podlagi novih informacij, ki so postale razpoložljive po datumu odobritve) ter se s tem ne sme omogočiti, da bi vse države članice uvedle splošno prepoved gojenja ali kakršne koli uporabe GSO.
It results from the above that, as the Polish authorities explained in their notification, point 5 and 6 of Article 111(2) and Article 172 are not compatible with Directive 2001/18/EC.
Iz navedenega izhaja, da člen 111(2)(5) in (6) ter člen 172 niso združljivi z Direktivo 2001/18/ES, kot so poljski organi pojasnili v uradnem obvestilu.
Under these circumstances, there is no need to further examine them under other Community legislation and in particular under Regulation 1829/2003/EC in the context of this Decision.
Glede na to jih ni treba dodatno obravnavati v skladu z drugo zakonodajo Skupnosti in zlasti v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1829/2003 v zvezi s to odločbo.
Nevertheless, the assessment under Directive 2001/18/EC will not prejudice the assessment on the compliance of the notified draft Act with other parts of Community law, and especially Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 in the context of other EC procedures.
Kljub temu ocena v skladu z Direktivo 2001/18/ES ne bo vplivala na oceno skladnosti priglašenega osnutka akta z drugimi deli zakonodaje Skupnosti in zlasti Uredbo (ES) 1829/2003 v zvezi z drugimi postopki ES.
Article 95(5) of the EC Treaty provides an exception to the principles of uniform application of Community law and the unity of the market.
Člen 95(5) Pogodbe ES določa odstopanje od načel enotne uporabe zakonodaje Skupnosti in enotnosti trga.
In accordance with the Court’s case law any exception to the principle of the uniform application of Community law and of the unity of the internal market must be strictly interpreted.
V skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča je treba kakršno koli odstopanje od načela enotne uporabe zakonodaje Skupnosti in enotnosti notranjega trga razlagati restriktivno.
Therefore, the exception provided for by Article 95(5) of the EC Treaty must be interpreted in such a way that its scope is not extended beyond the cases for which it formally provides.
Zato je treba odstopanje iz člena 95(5) Pogodbe ES razlagati tako, da področje uporabe ne presega primerov, ki jih formalno zajema.
In the light of the time-frame established by Article 95(6) of the EC Treaty, the Commission, when examining whether the draft national measures notified under Article 95(5) are justified, has to take as a basis ‘the grounds’ put forward by the Member State.
Komisija mora v časovnem okviru iz člena 95(6) Pogodbe ES pri preučevanju, ali so priglašeni osnutki nacionalnih ukrepov na podlagi člena 95(5) utemeljeni, upoštevati „razloge“, ki so jih predložile države članice.
This means that, under the Treaty, the responsibility of proving that these measures are justified lies with the Member State making the request.
To pomeni, da mora v skladu s Pogodbo upravičenost teh ukrepov dokazati država članica, ki je predložila zahtevo.
Given the procedural framework established by Article 95 of the EC Treaty, including in particular a strict deadline for a Decision to be adopted, the Commission normally has to restrict itself to examining the relevance of the elements which are submitted by the requesting Member State, without having to seek possible justifications itself.
Ob upoštevanju postopkovnega okvira, ki ga določa člen 95 Pogodbe ES, vključno zlasti s strogim rokom za sprejetje odločbe, bi se morala Komisija običajno omejiti na preučitev ustreznosti elementov, ki jih predložijo zadevne države članice, ne da bi ji bilo treba sami iskati možne obrazložitve.
Moreover, and given the exceptional character of the national measure concerned, the burden of proof for the existence of the requirements justifying the adoption of such a measure in accordance with Article 95(5) of the EC Treaty, lies with the Member State which notifies the measure.
Poleg tega mora glede na izjemen značaj zadevnega nacionalnega ukrepa obstoj zahtev, ki utemeljujejo sprejetje takega ukrepa v skladu s členom 95(5) Pogodbe ES, dokazati država članica, ki je uradno priglasila ukrep.
Article 95(5) of the Treaty requires that when a Member State deems it necessary to introduce national provisions derogating from a harmonisation measure, those provisions shall be justified on the following cumulative conditions [11]:
Člen 95(5) Pogodbe zahteva, da se, če država članica meni, da je treba uvesti nacionalne določbe, ki odstopajo od usklajevalnega ukrepa, te določbe utemeljijo na podlagi naslednjih kumulativnih pogojev [11]:
new scientific evidence,
nova znanstvena spoznanja,
relating to the protection of the environment or the working environment,
povezava z varstvom okolja ali delovnega okolja,
grounds of a problem specific to that Member State,
problem, ki je specifičen za zadevno državo članico,
arising after the adoption of the harmonisation measure.
problem se pojavi po sprejetju usklajevalnega ukrepa.
Therefore, under the abovementioned Article, the introduction of national measures which are incompatible with a Community harmonisation measure first of all needs to be justified by new scientific evidence concerning the protection of the environment or the working environment.
Zato je treba v skladu z zadevnim členom uvedbo nacionalnih ukrepov, ki so nezdružljivi z usklajevalnim ukrepom Skupnosti, najprej utemeljiti z novimi znanstvenimi spoznanji o varstvu okolja ali delovnega okolja.
As it results from paragraph 45 of this Decision, it is up to the Member State, which has requested that there is a need for a derogation, to provide new scientific evidence, in support of the measures notified.
Kot določa odstavek 45 te odločbe, mora nova znanstvena spoznanja za utemeljitev priglašenih ukrepov zagotoviti država članica, ki je zahtevala odstopanje.
The justifications put forward by Poland (text of notification, pages 3-5) are that:
Obrazložitve, ki jih je predložila Poljska (besedilo iz uradnega obvestila, strani 3–5), so naslednje:
the uncertainty surrounding the first stage of research where the new genetically modified organism comes into contact with the environment, where the effect of such a genetically modified organism on the environment is unknown and potentially harmful,
negotovost v zvezi s prvo stopnjo raziskav, na kateri pride nov gensko spremenjeni organizem v stik z okoljem, pri čemer vpliv takšnega gensko spremenjenega organizma ni znan in je lahko škodljiv,
the need to limit the cultivation of genetically modified plants to areas which do not contain elements of value from a nature conservation standpoint and whose agrarian structure enables safe cultivation of transgenic plants, without damaging the operations of other farmers,
potreba po omejevanju gojenja gensko spremenjenih rastlin na območja, ki ne vsebujejo pomembnih elementov s stališča ohranjanja narave in katerih kmetijska struktura omogoča varno gojenje transgenih rastlin in hkrati ne ovira dejavnosti drugih kmetov,
the need to fulfil the expectations of Polish society, while concerns relating to the cultivation of genetically modified plants are associated mainly with the impossibility of eliminating the risk of contamination of crops due to possible crossing,
potreba po izpolnjevanju pričakovanj poljske družbe, medtem ko je zaskrbljenost v zvezi z gojenjem gensko spremenjenih rastlin večinoma povezana z nezmožnostjo odprave tveganja za kontaminacijo rastlin zaradi mogočega križanja,
a high level of fragmentation of Polish agriculture, where it is not possible to isolate GM crops from conventional and organic crops, thus posing the uncontrolled introduction of transgenic plants into cultivation may inflict losses on farmers,
visoka raven drobitve kmetijstva na Poljskem, pri čemer ni mogoče ločiti gensko spremenjenih pridelkov od konvencionalnih in organskih pridelkov, nenadzorovano uvajanje gojenja transgenih rastlin pa lahko kmetom povzroči izgubo,
the reluctance of Polish farmers towards the cultivation of GMOs which is increased by the absence of provisions on compensation for agricultural losses resulting from the uncontrolled crossing of varieties, while at present there are no national provisions relating to the coexistence of the three forms of agriculture (conventional, organic and transgenic plants).
vedno večje nasprotovanje poljskih kmetov gojenju GSO, ker ni določb o nadomestilu za izgubo v kmetijstvu, ki jo povzroči nenadzorovano križanje sort, medtem ko zdaj ni nacionalnih določb o soobstoju treh oblik kmetijstva (konvencionalnega, ekološkega in kmetijstva, pri katerem se uporabljajo transgene rastline).