natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, no reliable information as to the production capacity and production volumes, stocks and sales was available for the non-cooperating company.
Vendar za nesodelujočo družbo ni bilo na voljo zanesljivih informacij o proizvodni zmogljivosti, obsegu proizvodnje, zalogah in prodaji.
In this respect, and in the absence of any indication of the contrary, it was considered that findings for the non-cooperating company would be in line with those established for cooperating companies.
Zaradi tega in zaradi pomanjkanja dokazov o nasprotnem se je štelo, da bi bile ugotovitve glede nesodelujoče družbe v skladu z ugotovitvami glede sodelujočih družb.
Since there were no exports to the Community for a representative dumping finding in the RIP, and in order to establish whether dumping would be likely to recur should the measures be repealed, the pricing behaviour of the cooperating exporting producers to other export markets and their production capacity and stocks were examined.
Ker v Skupnost ni bilo nobenega izvoza za reprezentativno analizo dampinga in za določitev, ali je verjetno, da se bo damping v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov ponovil, so bili proučeni obnašanje sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov pri določanju cen za druge izvozne trge, njuna proizvodna zmogljivost in zaloge.
The analysis was based on the information provided by the cooperating exporting producers mentioned in recital 55.
Analiza je temeljila na informacijah, ki sta jih predložila sodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika iz uvodne izjave (55).
It was examined whether the costs associated with the production and sales of the product under consideration were reasonably reflected in the records of the parties concerned.
Proučilo se je, ali so stroški, povezani s proizvodnjo in prodajo obravnavanega izdelka, v računovodskih evidencah zadevnih strank ustrezno prikazani.
As regards gas costs, it was found that the domestic gas price paid by the Russian producers was around one fifth of the export price of natural gas from Russia.
Kar zadeva stroške plina, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je domača cena plina, ki jo plačujejo ruski proizvajalci, približno ena petina izvozne cene zemeljskega plina iz Rusije.
In this regard, all available data indicates that domestic gas prices in Russia were regulated prices, which are far below market prices paid in unregulated markets for natural gas.
V zvezi s tem vsi razpoložljivi podatki kažejo, da so bile domače cene plina v Rusiji nadzorovane in so precej nižje od tržnih cen, ki veljajo na nenadzorovanih trgih zemeljskega plina.
Therefore, as provided for in Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation, the gas costs borne by the Russian producers were adjusted on the basis of information from other representative markets.
Zato so bili v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe stroški plina, ki so jih imeli ruski proizvajalci, prilagojeni na podlagi informacij z drugih reprezentativnih trgov.
The adjusted price was based on the average price of Russian gas when sold for export at the German/Czech border (Waidhaus), net of transport costs.
Prilagojena cena je temeljila na povprečni ceni ruskega plina pri prodaji za izvoz na nemško/češki meji (Waidhaus) in neto stroških prevoza.
Waidhaus, being the main hub for Russian gas sales to the EU, which is both the largest market for Russian gas and has prices reasonably reflecting costs, can be considered a representative market within the meaning of Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation.
Waidhaus, glavno vozlišče za prodajo ruskega plina v EU, ki je hkrati največji trg za ruski plin in na katerem cene ustrezno odražajo stroške, se lahko šteje za reprezentativen trg v smislu člena 2(5) osnovne uredbe.
The construction of the normal value was done on the basis of the manufacturing costs of the product type exported, after the adjustment for the gas cost mentioned in recital 58, plus a reasonable amount SG&A costs and for profits, in accordance with Article 2(3) and Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost je bila izračunana na podlagi stroškov za proizvodnjo izdelka, ki se izvaža, po prilagoditvi za stroške plina iz uvodne izjave (58), temu pa je bil prištet ustrezni znesek PSA-stroškov in dobička v skladu s členom 2(3) in (6) osnovne uredbe.
As for Algeria, SG&A costs and profit could not be established on the basis of the chapeau of Article 2(6), first sentence, of the basic Regulation because the related manufacturers did not have representative domestic sales of the product concerned in the ordinary course of trade.
Kot v primeru Alžirije PSA-stroškov in dobička ni bilo mogoče določiti na podlagi člena 2(6) osnovne uredbe, ker povezani proizvajalci niso imeli reprezentativne domače prodaje zadevnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovanja.
Article 2(6)(a) of the basic Regulation could not be applied, since there are only these two producers subject to the investigation.
Člena 2(6)(a) osnovne uredbe ni bilo mogoče uporabiti, ker sta predmet preiskave le ta dva proizvajalca.
Article 2(6)(b) was not applicable either, since the manufacturing costs for products belonging to the same general category of goods would also need to be adjusted in respect of gas costs, for the reasons indicated in recital 58 above.
Člen 2(6)(b) se prav tako ni uporabil, ker bi bilo treba proizvodne stroške za izdelke, ki spadajo v isto splošno kategorijo blaga, prilagoditi glede na stroške plina zaradi razlogov, navedenih v zgornji uvodni izjavi (58).
As it was found to be impossible to establish the magnitude of the necessary adjustment for all products belonging to the same general category of goods sold domestically, it is equally impossible to establish the profit margins after such adjustment.
Ker ni bilo mogoče določiti velikosti potrebne prilagoditve za vse izdelke, ki spadajo v isto splošno kategorijo blaga, prodanega na domačem trgu, prav tako ni bilo mogoče določiti stopenj dobička po takšni prilagoditvi.
As in the case of Algeria and for the same reasons as explained in recital 31, SG&A costs and profit were established on the basis of the weighted average SG&A costs and profit from the same three North American producers.
Kot v primeru Alžirije in iz razlogov, omenjenih v uvodni izjavi (31), so se PSA-stroški in dobiček določili na podlagi tehtanega povprečja PSA-stroškov in dobička istih treh severnoameriških proizvajalcev.
It should be noted that the amount for profit so established did not exceed the profit realised by the Russian producers on sales of products of the same general category on their domestic market.
Opozoriti je treba, da znesek tako določenega dobička ni presegel dobička, ki so ga ustvarili ruski proizvajalci pri prodaji izdelkov iste splošne kategorije na domačem trgu.
It was found that the export sales of the two cooperating producers were made on the basis of an agent agreement through two related traders, one located in Switzerland and the other one on the British Virgin Islands.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da sta sodelujoča proizvajalca izvažala izdelke na podlagi sporazuma o zastopstvu prek dveh povezanih trgovcev, enega s sedežem v Švici in drugega s sedežem na Britanskih Deviških otokih.
The latter ceased to operate at the beginning of 2005.
Slednji je prenehal delovati na začetku leta 2005.
The export price was established on the basis of export prices actually paid or payable to the first independent customer in the USA, their major export market.
Izvozna cena je bila določena na podlagi izvoznih cen prvemu neodvisnemu kupcu v ZDA, največjem izvoznem trgu sodelujočega proizvajalca, ki so bile dejansko plačane ali plačljive.
Data from the two related traders showed that export prices to third countries were lower than the constructed normal value in Russia.
Podatki dveh povezanih trgovcev so pokazali, da so bile izvozne cene za tretje države nižje od konstruirane normalne vrednosti v Rusiji.
In fact, the investigation established that overall this price difference ranged in the RIP between 2 % and 6 %.
Dejansko je bilo v preiskavi ugotovljeno, da je bila razlika v cenah v OPP na splošno med 2 % in 6 %.
Spare capacity in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine
Proste zmogljivosti v Belorusiji, Rusiji in Ukrajini
The possible effects of existing spare capacity were also examined.
Proučili so se tudi možni vplivi prostih zmogljivosti.
Neither Russia nor Ukraine has a relevant domestic market for UAN.
Niti Rusija niti Ukrajina nimata ustreznega domačega trga za SAN.
On the contrary, Belarus is considered to have a considerable domestic market for this product.
Nasprotno velja, da ima Belorusija za ta izdelek precejšen domač trg.
The Belarusian sole producer managed to increase its production by 14 % during the period considered, and was producing close to full capacity during the RIP.
Edini proizvajalec iz Belorusije je v obravnavanem obdobju proizvodnjo povečal za 14 %, v OPP pa je proizvajal skoraj s polno zmogljivostjo.
Its production capacity during the same period remained stable.
V istem obdobju je njegova proizvodna zmogljivost ostala stabilna.
It sold around 60 % of its production domestically, the remainder being exported to the USA.
Približno 60 % svojih izdelkov je prodal na domačem trgu, preostanek pa izvozil v ZDA.
It therefore appears that this producer does not have any spare production capacity readily available.
Zato se zdi, da ta proizvajalec nima na voljo nobenih prostih proizvodnih zmogljivosti.
The Russian sole cooperating producer increased its production by 78 % during the period considered.
Edini ruski sodelujoči proizvajalec je v obravnavanem obdobju povečal svojo proizvodnjo za 78 %.
However, according to the information submitted, this producer still has significant available capacity of around 600000 to 700000 tonnes to increase its production of UAN, and could, should measures be repealed, use this spare capacity to increase exports to the Community market.
Vendar ima v skladu s predloženimi informacijami ta proizvajalec še vedno precej razpoložljivih zmogljivosti za povečanje proizvodnje SAN, približno od 600000 do 700000 ton, in lahko v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov te proste zmogljivosti uporabi za povečanje izvoza na trg Skupnosti.
Investment made by the company during the period considered suggests a potential further increase in production capacity.
Naložba družbe v obravnavanem obdobju kaže na možno dodatno povečanje proizvodnih zmogljivosti.
It is estimated that Russian overall spare capacity is at least the known 600000 to 700000 tonnes, which constitutes around 20 % of Community consumption.
Ocenjuje se, da znašajo celotne ruske proste zmogljivosti vsaj znanih 600000 do 700000 ton, kar je približno 20 % potrošnje Skupnosti.
Exports to third countries grew by 79 % during the period considered.
Izvoz v tretje države je v obravnavanem obdobju zrasel za 79 %.
At the same time, the domestic sales of the sole cooperating Russian producer remained at a low level, representing on average less than 5 % of total sales.
Hkrati je domača prodaja edinega sodelujočega ruskega proizvajalca ostala nizka in je v povprečju predstavljala manj kot 5 % celotne prodaje.
Since the domestic market cannot absorb the increase in production, any increase in production is likely to be exported.
Ker domači trg ne more absorbirati povečanja proizvodnje, se bo vsa povečana proizvodnja verjetno izvozila.
As to Ukraine, the two cooperating producers managed to increase production twelvefold during the period considered.
V Ukrajini sta oba sodelujoča proizvajalca v obravnavanem obdobju povečala proizvodnjo za dvanajstkrat.
Production capacity during the same period increased almost fivefold.
Proizvodna zmogljivost se je v istem obdobju povečala skoraj za petkrat.
In addition, they have considerable spare capacity to increase exports to the Community market in significant volumes should measures be repealed.
Poleg tega imata proizvajalca precejšnje proste zmogljivosti za znatno povečanje obsega izvoza na trg Skupnosti v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov.
It is estimated that Ukrainian overall spare capacity amounts to 700000 to 800000 tonnes, which constitutes around 20 % of Community consumption.
Ocenjuje se, da so celotne ukrajinske proste zmogljivosti od 700000 do 800000 ton, kar je približno 20 % potrošnje Skupnosti.
Exports to third countries increased by eightfold during the period considered.
Izvoz v tretje države se je v obravnavanem obdobju povečal za osemkrat.
Ukrainian domestic sales remained at a low level during the period considered, representing on average less than 2 % of total sales.
Domača prodaja v Ukrajini je v obravnavanem obdobju ostala nizka in je v povprečju predstavljala manj kot 2 % celotne prodaje.
It should be noted that growth of the domestic market cannot absorb the increase in production and therefore any increase in production is likely to be exported.
Opozoriti je treba, da rast domačega trga ne more absorbirati povečanja proizvodnje, zato se bo vsa povečana proizvodnja verjetno izvozila.
On the basis of the above, it can be concluded that the cooperating producers, with the exception of Belarus, have substantial spare capacity to increase their exports to the Community market should measures be repealed.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je mogoče skleniti, da imata sodelujoča proizvajalca, z izjemo Belorusije, v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov precej prostih zmogljivosti za povečanje izvoza na trg Skupnosti.
Relationship between export prices to third countries and the prevailing price level in the Community
Razmerje med izvoznimi cenami za tretje države in prevladujočo ravnijo cen v Skupnosti
It should be noted that the generally prevailing price level of the Community producers in the Community was lower than the average export price level of the exporting producers to third countries during the RIP, especially to the USA.
Opozoriti je treba, da je bila v Skupnosti v OPP splošno prevladujoča raven cen proizvajalcev Skupnosti nižja od povprečne ravni izvoznih cen proizvajalcev izvoznikov v tretje države, zlasti v ZDA.
This is explained by the fact that gas prices, which constitute more than 50 % of the manufacturing costs, and thus UAN prices, were higher in the USA than in Europe, and that accordingly UAN traded at a higher price in the USA.
To lahko razloži dejstvo, da so bile cene plina, ki predstavljajo več kot 50 % proizvodnih stroškov, in s tem cene SAN višje v ZDA kot Evropi in da se je temu ustrezno s SAN v ZDA trgovalo po višjih cenah.
It should be noted that the export prices from the countries concerned to the USA were on average lower than the respective normal values, even though the prevailing price level in the USA was higher than prices in the Community.
Opozoriti je treba, da so bile izvozne cene iz zadevnih držav v ZDA v povprečju nižje od zadevnih normalnih vrednosti, čeprav je bila prevladujoča raven cen v ZDA višja od cen v Skupnosti.
It can therefore be concluded that any sales to the EC market would most probably be at dumped prices.
Zato je mogoče skleniti, da bi vsaka prodaja na trg ES najverjetneje potekala po dampinških cenah.
Incentive to shift sales from other markets to the Community
Spodbuda za preusmeritev prodaje z drugih trgov na trg Skupnosti
With regard to Belarus, there is a rapidly growing domestic market on which the sole producer sells two thirds of its production.
Belorusija ima hitro rastoč domači trg, na katerem edini proizvajalec proda dve tretjini svojih izdelkov.
Given that the domestic price is less than a half of the prevailing price in the Community during the RIP, there is likelihood that a rational economic decision leads the Belarusian producer to redirect significant quantities currently sold on the domestic market to the Community market at dumped prices.
Ker znaša domača cena manj kot polovico prevladujoče cene v Skupnosti v OPP, je verjetno, da bo beloruski proizvajalec na podlagi razumne ekonomske odločitve velike količine izdelkov, ki jih trenutno proda na domačem trgu, preusmeril na trg Skupnosti po dampinških cenah.
In this respect, it should also be noted that the Belarusian producer who is currently exporting the remaining third to other markets would have considerable transport cost advantages when exporting to the Community instead, given its proximity to the Community border compared to other potential export markets for the Belarusian producer such as the USA, Argentina or Australia.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da bi beloruski proizvajalec, ki preostalo tretjino trenutno izvaža na druge trge, ob izvozu v Skupnost užival precejšnje ugodnosti prevoznih stroškov, glede na bližino meja Skupnosti v primerjavi z drugimi možnimi izvoznimi trgi, kot so ZDA, Argentina ali Avstralija.
In the light of the above, there is likelihood that the Belarusian producer would redirect significant parts of its sales to the Community at dumped prices, should measures be repealed, as there are strong economic incentives.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je verjetno, da bi v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov beloruski proizvajalec znaten del prodaje preusmeril v Skupnost po dampinških cenah, saj za to obstajajo močne ekonomske spodbude.
Conclusions on the likely export behaviour for Belarus, Russia and Ukraine
Sklepi v zvezi z verjetnim obnašanjem Belorusije, Rusije in Ukrajine glede izvoza
As already explained in recital 20, in the absence of exports to the Community during the RIP by Belarus, Russia and Ukraine, dumping from these countries could not be established in respect of exports to the Community.
Kot je že pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (20), Belorusija, Rusija in Ukrajina v OPP v Skupnost niso izvažale, zato dampinga iz teh držav pri izvozu v Skupnost ni bilo mogoče določiti.
However, as explained in section 2, the investigation has shown that on the basis of calculations carried out by using data relating to actual exports from these countries to their major export market, the USA, that there was a likelihood of recurrence of dumping.
Vseeno pa je preiskava pokazala, kot je razloženo v oddelku 2 zgoraj, da je na podlagi izračunov, opravljenih z uporabo podatkov o dejanskem izvozu iz teh držav na njihov glavni izvozni trg ZDA, obstajala verjetnost ponovitve dampinga.
Conclusion on the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping
Sklep o verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga
On the basis of the analysis carried out in sections 1 to 5, it is concluded that should measures be repealed, there is likelihood that additional production would be exported to the Community, or sales currently exported to countries outside the Community or sold on the domestic markets would be redirected towards the Community market in significant quantities.
Na podlagi analize, opravljene v oddelkih od 1 do 5 zgoraj, se sklene, da je v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov verjeten izvoz dodatne proizvodnje v Skupnost ali preusmeritev znatnih količin proizvodnje, ki se trenutno izvozi v države zunaj Skupnosti ali proda na domačih trgih, na trg Skupnosti.
It is likely that these exports to the Community will be made at dumped prices, in particular to regain lost market shares in the Community.
Verjetno je, da bo ta izvoz v Skupnost potekal po dampinških cenah, da se tako ponovno pridobijo izgubljeni tržni deleži v Skupnosti.
It can therefore be concluded that, should measures be repealed, future exports to the Community would be made in increased quantities at dumped prices.
Zato je mogoče skleniti, da bi se v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov prihodnji obseg izvoza v Skupnost povečal in bi potekal po dampinških cenah.
Moreover, it should be noted that overseas markets are subject to higher transportation costs than the Community market, namely when considering sales from neighbouring countries, such as Belarus and Ukraine to Eastern Europe or Algeria to Southern Europe.
Poleg tega je treba Opozoriti, da so prevozni stroški za čezmorske trge višji kot za trg Skupnosti, in sicer pri obravnavi prodaje iz sosednjih držav, kot sta Belorusija in Ukrajina, v Vzhodno Evropo ali iz Alžirije v Južno Evropo.
As regards imports into the Community originating in Algeria, since they are still made at dumped prices, and also on the above analysis of spare capacities and the comparison of price levels, dumping from Algeria is likely to continue in the future.
V zvezi z uvozom iz Alžirije v Skupnost, ki še vedno poteka po dampinških cenah, ter tudi na podlagi zgornje analize prostih zmogljivosti in primerjave ravni cen se bo v prihodnosti damping iz Alžirije verjetno nadaljeval.
Given that the Community was the only export market for Algeria during the RIP, it is highly likely that Algerian exporters would direct their increased export volumes mainly to this market.
Glede na to, da je bila Skupnost v OPP edini izvozni trg za Alžirijo, je zelo verjetno, da bi alžirski izvozniki povečan obseg svojega izvoza usmerili predvsem na ta trg.
In the light of the above, it is concluded that there is likelihood of continuation (from Algeria) and recurrence (from Russia, Belarus and Ukraine) of dumping should measures be repealed.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega se sklene, da je v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov verjetno nadaljevanje (iz Alžirije) in ponovitev (iz Rusije, Belorusije in Ukrajine) dampinga.
Within the Community, the product concerned is manufactured by 12 producers whose output constitutes the total Community production within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation.
V Skupnosti zadevni izdelek proizvaja 12 proizvajalcev, katerih proizvodnja predstavlja celotno proizvodnjo Skupnosti v smislu člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe.
It should be noted that as compared to the original investigation, the ‘Hydro Agri’ companies have been renamed ‘Yara’.
Opozoriti je treba, da se je v primerjavi s prvotno preiskavo družba „Hydro Agri“ preimenovala v „Yara“.
Five companies have become part of the Community industry due to the enlargement of the European Union in 2004.
Zaradi širitve Evropske unije leta 2004 je pet družb postalo del industrije Skupnosti.
Out of the 12 Community producers, 10 companies cooperated with the investigation out of which nine were mentioned in the review request.
Od 12 proizvajalcev Skupnosti je 10 družb sodelovalo pri preiskavi, od tega jih je bilo devet omenjenih v zahtevku za pregled.
The remaining two producers (other Community producers) remained silent.
Preostala dva proizvajalca („drugi proizvajalci Skupnosti“) nista dala izjav.
Accordingly, the following 10 producers agreed to cooperate:
V skladu s tem je v sodelovanje privolilo naslednjih 10 proizvajalcev:
AMI Agrolinz Melamine International GmbH (Austria),
AMI Agrolinz Melamine International GmbH (Avstrija),
DSM Agro (The Netherlands),
DSM Agro (Nizozemska),
Duslo AS (Slovakia),
Duslo AS (Slovaška),
Fertiberia SA (Spain),
Fertiberia SA (Španija),
Grande Paroisse SA (France),
Grande Paroisse SA (Francija),
Lovochemie AS (Czech Republic),
Lovochemie AS (Češka),
Nitrogénművek Rt (Hungary),
Nitrogénművek Rt (Madžarska),
SKW Stickstoffwerke Piesteritz GmbH (Germany),
SKW Stickstoffwerke Piesteritz GmbH (Nemčija),
Yara (The Netherlands, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom).
Yara (Nizozemska, Nemčija, Italija in Združeno kraljestvo).
As these 10 Community producers accounted for 75 % of the total Community production during the RIP, it is therefore considered that the above 10 Community producers account for a major proportion of the total Community production of the like product.
Ker je teh 10 proizvajalcev Skupnosti v OPP predstavljalo 75 % celotne proizvodnje Skupnosti, se šteje, da zgoraj omenjenih 10 proizvajalcev Skupnosti predstavlja večji del celotne proizvodnje podobnega izdelka v Skupnosti.
They are therefore deemed to constitute the Community industry within the meaning of Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation and will hereinafter be referred to as the ‘Community industry’.
Zato zanje velja, da predstavljajo industrijo Skupnosti v smislu členov 4(1) in 5(4) osnovne uredbe in bodo v nadaljnjem besedilu imenovani „industrija Skupnosti“.
As indicated under recitals 10, 15 and 16, a sample consisting of four companies was selected.
Kot je omenjeno v uvodnih izjavah (10), (15) in (16), je bil sestavljen vzorec iz štirih družb.
All sampled Community producers cooperated and sent questionnaire replies within the deadlines.
Sodelovali so vsi vzorčeni proizvajalci Skupnosti, ki so v rokih poslali izpolnjen vprašalnik.