natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In view of this and the revised Community consumption data (see recital 51), the market share of the imports from the PRC is accordingly modified over the period considered as follows:
Ob upoštevanju tega in zaradi nekoliko spremenjenih podatkov o potrošnji Skupnosti (glej uvodno izjavo 51) se tržni delež uvoza iz LRK v obravnavanem obdobju ustrezno spremeni, kot je navedeno spodaj:
The market share held by imports from the PRC increased by 1,6 percentage points during the period considered.
V obravnavanem obdobju se je uvoz iz LRK povečal za 1,6 odstotne točke.
During the IP, Chinese imports accounted for 12,9 % of the whole Community market.
V OP je kitajski uvoz predstavljal 12,9 % celotnega trga Skupnosti.
In view of the revised 2003 import data, the import prices originating from the PRC as described in recital 68 of the provisional Regulation have been modified accordingly.
Ob upoštevanju spremenjenih podatkov o uvozu za leto 2003 so bile cene uvoza iz LRK, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 68 začasne uredbe, ustrezno spremenjene.
The average price of the imports thus decreased by 3 %.
Povprečna cena uvoza se je tako znižala za 3 %.
Unit prices
Cena na enoto
Subsequent to definitive disclosure, the complainant submitted that the Commission should not have excluded any matching models from the undercutting calculation.
Po dokončnem razkritju je pritožnik trdil, da Komisija ne bi smela izključiti nobenega ujemajočega se modela iz izračuna nelojalnega nižanja cen.
It alleged that by doing so, the Community prices of imports from the PRC would have been dramatically overstated.
Trdil je, da bi bile na ta način cene uvoza Skupnosti iz LRK močno prenapihnjene.
With regard to this matter, in recital 70 of the provisional Regulation it is indeed stipulated that a limited number of models (PCNs) was excluded from the undercutting comparison as it was considered that the comparison per model had to be meaningful and fair and, therefore, no comparison between a standard grade and a special grade falling within the product definition should be allowed.
V zvezi s tem je v uvodni izjavi 70 začasne uredbe res določeno, da se nekateri modeli („PCN“) izključijo iz primerjave nelojalnega nižanja cen, saj se je štelo, da mora biti primerjava po modelih smiselna in pravična, zato primerjava med izdelkoma standardne in posebne kakovosti v okviru opisa izdelka ne sme biti dovoljena.
The PCNs concerned accounted for 34 % of Chinese imports during the IP, but the Community industry (not the complainant) produced them in very small volumes, representing 0,1 % to 0,5 % of its sales of the like products during the IP.
Zadevni PCN so v OP nanesli 34 % uvoza iz Kitajske, industrija Skupnosti (ne pritožnik) pa jih je proizvedla v majhnih količinah, ki so v OP predstavljale 0,1–0,5 % njene prodaje podobnih izdelkov.
Whereas the imports from the PRC of PVA within these PCNs concerned a standard grade PVA, the Community producer of these PCNs had submitted to the Commission that in its case the PCNs in question concerned high-end speciality products for use in niche applications which cannot be substituted by standard PVA.
Medtem ko je šlo pri uvozu PVA iz LRK v okviru teh PCN za PVA standardne kakovosti, je proizvajalec Skupnosti teh PCN Komisiji pojasnil, da so se v njegovem primeru PCN nanašali na vrhunske specializirane izdelke za uporabo v tržnih nišah, ki jih ni mogoče nadomestiti s standardnim PVA.
Furthermore, they had not been produced on its standard production line but in its speciality plant through a batch manufacturing process.
Poleg tega niso bili proizvedeni na njegovi standardni proizvodni liniji, temveč v posebni tovarni v serijskem proizvodnem procesu.
It was also specifically reported by the Community producer concerned that this PVA did not compete with standard PVA.
Zadevni proizvajalec Skupnosti je izrecno trdil, da ta PVA ni predstavljal konkurence standardnemu PVA.
Accordingly, it was concluded by the Commission that for these PCNs imported from the PRC, which were standard PVA, there were no matching grades sold by the Community industry.
V skladu s tem je Komisija sklenila, da za te PCN, uvožene iz LRK, ki so bili standardni PVA, industrija Skupnosti ni prodajala izdelkov enakovredne kakovosti.
In view of the fact that the undercutting calculation could then still be based on representative volumes (i.e. 54 % of the imports concerned), it was decided to exclude these PCNs from the comparison.
Ob upoštevanju dejstva, da bi izračun nelojalnega nižanja cen še vedno lahko temeljil na reprezentativnih količinah (tj. na 54 % zadevnega uvoza), je bila sprejeta odločitev, da se ti PCN izključijo iz primerjave.
On that basis, and as the submission of the complainant did not contain any evidence to the contrary, it is confirmed that the exclusion of these PCNs from the undercutting calculations is justified and the claim is, therefore, dismissed.
Na podlagi tega in ker vloga pritožnika ni vsebovala nobenih nasprotnih dokazov, se potrdi, da je izključitev teh PCN iz izračuna nelojalnega nižanja cen utemeljena, trditev pa se zato zavrne.
In the absence of any other new and substantiated information or argument in this respect, recitals 65 to 71 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed, with the exception of the Chinese import and market share data, which issues have been addressed above.
Ker v zvezi s tem ni nobenih novih utemeljenih informacij ali utemeljitev, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 65 do 71 začasne uredbe, z izjemo podatkov o kitajskem uvozu in tržnem deležu, ki so bili obravnavani zgoraj.
Market shares in the Community
Tržni deleži v Skupnosti
Given the revised figures for Community consumption (see recital 51), the market share of the Community industry is accordingly modified over the period considered as follows:
Zaradi spremenjenih vrednosti potrošnje Skupnosti (glej uvodno izjavo 51 zgoraj) se je tržni delež industrije Skupnosti v obravnavanem obdobju ustrezno spremenil:
Market share Community Industry
Tržni delež industrije Skupnosti
As concluded in recital 76 of the provisional Regulation, the Community industry has, in terms of sales volumes, benefited from the increasing demand on the Community market.
Kot je bilo ugotovljeno v uvodni izjavi 76 začasne uredbe, je imela industrija Skupnosti glede obsega prodaje koristi zaradi povečanega povpraševanja na trgu Skupnosti.
Conclusion on injury
Sklep o oceni škode
Subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was decided to impose provisional anti-dumping measures, several parties claimed that most injury indicators had developed positively, therefore there would be no material injury.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih so bili uvedeni začasni protidampinški ukrepi, je več strank trdilo, da se je večina kazalnikov škode razvila v pozitivno smer, zato ni prišlo do znatne škode.
It was even submitted by one interested party that the Commission had concluded that the Community industry had suffered material injury on the basis of the decline in Community industry sales prices only.
Ena izmed zainteresiranih strank je celo trdila, da je Komisija ugotovila, da je industrija Skupnosti utrpela znatno škodo zgolj zaradi znižanja industrijskih prodajnih cen v Skupnosti.
In this respect, it should be recalled that, as indicated in recital 90 of the provisional Regulation, indeed a number of indicators developed positively during the period considered, due to the strong and increasing demand on the Community market.
Treba je poudariti, da se je, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 90 začasne uredbe, zaradi močnega in naraščajočega povpraševanja na trgu Skupnosti v obravnavanem obdobju pozitivno razvilo veliko število kazalnikov.
However, the price depression on the Community market coupled with the worldwide strong increase of main raw material costs has lead to a negative development of all financial indicators such as profitability, return on investment and cash flow.
Vendar pa je znižanje cen na trgu Skupnosti, skupaj s splošnim svetovnim povišanjem cen glavnih surovin, vodilo do negativnega razvoja vseh finančnih kazalnikov, kot so dobičkonosnost, donosnost naložb in denarni tok.
This is explained in detail in recitals 84 and 85 of the provisional Regulation.
To je podrobno pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 84 in 85 začasne uredbe.
Although, as stated in Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, not one or more of the relevant economic factors which are evaluated in this respect necessarily give decisive guidance, it is obvious that the financial indicators are amongst the key indicators.
Čeprav, kot je navedeno v členu 3(5) osnovne uredbe, eden ali več ustreznih gospodarskih dejavnikov, ki se ocenjuje v zvezi z omenjenim, še ne pomeni nujno odločilne usmeritve, pa je očitno, da so finančni kazalniki med ključnimi kazalniki.
The argument, therefore, has to be dismissed.
Zato je treba argument zavrniti.
In the absence of any further new and substantiated information or argument on the situation of the Community industry, recitals 72 to 92 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed, with the exception of recitals 75 and 76 which have been addressed above.
Ker ni nobenih novih utemeljenih informacij ali argumentov glede položaja industrije Skupnosti, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 72 do 92 začasne uredbe, z izjemo uvodnih izjav 75 in 76, ki sta bili obravnavani zgoraj.
Several interested parties pointed at the provisional finding that Chinese imports dropped strongly between 2003 and 2004.
Več zainteresiranih strank je izpostavilo začasno ugotovitev, da se je kitajski uvoz v letih 2003 in 2004 zelo zmanjšal.
They claimed that in view of the fact that in the same period, the profitability of the Community industry deteriorated dramatically by 62 %, the price depression could not have been caused by the Chinese imports.
Trdile so, da na podlagi dejstva, da se je v enakem obdobju dobičkonosnost industrije Skupnosti dramatično poslabšala za 62 %, znižanja cen ni mogel povzročiti kitajski uvoz.
In this respect it is to be recalled that the investigation had established that imports from the PRC undercut the Community industry prices by 3,3 % during the IP and that imports from the PRC have, throughout the period considered, been declared at the Community frontier at prices lower than those obtained by the Community industry.
Zato je treba poudariti, da je bilo med preiskavo ugotovljeno, da je uvoz iz LRK v OP nelojalno znižal industrijske cene Skupnosti za 3,3 % in da je bil v obravnavanem obdobju uvoz iz LRK na mejah Skupnosti deklariran s cenami, ki so bile nižje od tistih, ki jih je določila industrija Skupnosti.
The difference between Eurostat import prices from the PRC and Community industry sales prices appears to be more significant in 2003 than during the IP.
Razlika med uvoznimi cenami iz LRK, ki jih navaja Eurostat, in prodajnimi industrijskimi cenami Skupnosti je očitno večja v letu 2003 kot v OP.
However, on the basis of such analysis no conclusion can be drawn as regards the undercutting in the years preceding the IP; an accurate and reliable undercutting margin can only be calculated for the IP as it should be made on the basis of a model-by-model comparison and whilst making the appropriate adjustment for (post-) importation costs and differences in level of trade.
Vendar pa na podlagi takšne analize ni mogoče priti do zaključkov glede nelojalnega nižanja cen v letih pred OP; natančno stopnjo nelojalnega nižanja cen se lahko izračuna samo za OP, saj mora temeljiti na primerjavi modelov in tako omogočiti ustrezno prilagoditev za (po)uvozne stroške in razlike v ravni trgovanja.
Such data were only available for the IP.
Tovrstni podatki so bili na voljo samo za OP.
No conclusion can therefore be drawn as to whether imports from the PRC have undercut the Community industry prices throughout the period considered.
Zato ni mogoče sprejeti nobenega sklepa o tem, ali je uvoz iz LRK v obravnavanem obdobju nelojalno znižal industrijske cene Skupnosti.
The investigation had further established that there was a significant price depression on the market.
S preiskavo je bilo nadalje ugotovljeno, da so se cene na trgu občutno znižale.
This price depression was injurious in view of the strong increase in the main raw material costs throughout the same period, as elaborated in recitals 78 and 79 of the provisional Regulation.
To znižanje cen je bilo škodljivo zaradi velikega zvišanja cen glavnih surovin v istem obdobju, kakor je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 78 in 79 začasne uredbe.
In view of the comments received and mentioned in recital 70, the development of raw material prices during the period considered was analysed on a year-by-year basis.
Glede na pripombe, ki so bile prejete in navedene v uvodni izjavi 70, je bil razvoj cen surovin v obravnavanem obdobju preiskave analiziran za vsako leto posebej.
As mentioned in recital 78 of the provisional Regulation, vinyl acetate monomer (VAM) is PVAs key raw material.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 78 začasne uredbe, je vinil acetatni monomer („VAM“) ključna surovina za PVA.
It accounts for approximately 65 % of the manufacturing cost of PVA.
Predstavlja približno 65 % proizvodnih stroškov PVA.
The table below displays the cost of VAM per tonne of PVA during the period considered:
Spodnja preglednica prikazuje ceno VAM na tono PVA v obravnavanem obdobju:
Cost of VAM per tonne PVA
Strošek VAM na tono PVA
The analysis showed that in 2004, the increase in raw material costs was moderate as compared to the increase of these costs in 2005 and the IP.
Analiza je pokazala, da je bilo v letu 2004 zvišanje cen surovin zmerno v primerjavi z zvišanjem teh cen v letu 2005 in v OP.
In view of this development of raw material prices, which is best illustrated by the development of VAM-costs above and which did not closely correspond with the trend in profitability, it can be concluded that the sharp decrease in profitability during 2004 was caused more by the 7 % decrease in Community industrys sales prices, as indicated in recital 79 of the provisional Regulation, than by the increase in raw material costs.
Glede na razvoj cen surovin, ki je najbolje ponazorjen z zgornjim razvojem cen VAM in ni bil popolnoma usklajen s razvojem dobičkonosnosti, je mogoče sklepati, da je bilo občutno zmanjšanje dobičkonosnosti v letu 2004 bolj posledica 7-odstotnega upada prodajnih cen v industriji Skupnosti, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 79 začasne uredbe, kakor zvišanja cen surovin.
Following the above, the market shares in 2004 were analysed further in absolute terms as well as compared to 2003 to establish whether the dumped imports, taken in isolation, have had a material impact on the injury.
Na podlagi navedenega so bili tržni deleži za leto 2004 nadalje analizirani v absolutnem smislu in primerjani s tistimi za leto 2003, da se ugotovi, ali je dampinški uvoz, obravnavan ločeno, znatno vplival na škodo.
It was established that during 2004 the Community industry increased its market share by 1 %.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je industrija Skupnosti v letu 2004 povečala svoj tržni delež za 1 %.
At the same time, Chinese imports lost 16 % of their market share.
Hkrati je Kitajska pri uvozu izgubila 16 % svojega tržnega deleža.
The result was that during 2004, the market share of the Community industry accounted for more than fourfold the market share of the PRC.
Zato je bil tržni delež Skupnosti leta 2004 več kot štirikrat večji od tržnega deleža LRK.
In these circumstances, it is indeed considered difficult to attribute the price depression in the pivotal year 2004 to the imports from the PRC, as its quantities were relatively low and strongly declining.
V teh okoliščinah je znižanje cen v ključnem letu 2004 zelo težko pripisati uvozu iz LRK, saj je bila količina razmeroma majhna in se je zelo zmanjševala.
Following definitive disclosure, the Community industry argued that even with a low market share the dumped imports managed to cause severe disruption on the market, due to the nature of the business.
Po dokončnem razkritju je industrija Skupnosti trdila, da je kljub nizkemu tržnemu deležu dampinški uvoz zaradi narave poslovanja povzročil resne motnje na trgu.
It claimed that the Commission would have argued that PVA is a commodity, and that the lowest price quoted on the market determines to a large extent the market price, which other producers have to adapt to, if they wish to keep their orders.
Trdila je, da je Komisija utemeljevala, da je PVA blago in najnižja cena na trgu v veliki meri določa tržno ceno, ki se ji morajo ostali proizvajalci prilagoditi, če želijo ohraniti svoja naročila.
It should be clarified that the Commission had, in the definitive disclosure document, only cited a claim of the complainant without endorsing it.
Pojasniti je treba, da je Komisija v dokumentu o dokončnem razkritju samo navajala trditev pritožnika, ne da bi jo podprla.
The complainant further argued that this alleged influence of imports from the PRC on the Community industry sales prices would be demonstrated by the decreasing trend in the Community industry’s sales prices over the period considered, while prices of the main raw material, VAM, soared.
Pritožnik je tudi trdil, da bi se domnevni vpliv uvoza iz LRK na prodajne cene industrije Skupnosti kazal v trendu nižanja prodajnih cen industrije Skupnosti v obravnavanem obdobju, ob tem pa so se cene glavne surovine VAM višale.
The Community industry maintained that it was not in a position to pass on the increase in raw material prices to its customers due to the strong price pressure of the dumped imports which would have led to a pronounced decrease in profitability, return on investments and cash flow.
Industrija Skupnosti je trdila, da višjih cen surovin zaradi močnega pritiska dampinškega uvoza, ki bi povzročil izrazit upad dobičkonosnosti, donosnosti naložb in denarnih tokov, ne more prenesti na svoje stranke.
Nevertheless, when looking at the development in more detail, it appears that the considerable deterioration of the Community industry’s financial situation occurred mainly as from 2004 until the IP.
Kljub temu se ob natančnejši preučitvi razvoja zdi, da je do znatnega poslabšanja finančnega položaja industrije Skupnosti prišlo večinoma v obdobju od leta 2004 do OP.
In 2003, when imports from the PRC had a market share of 11,3 % and sales prices did not vary much from the subsequent years, the Community industry was performing satisfactorily, in particular in terms of profitability.
Leta 2003, ko je uvoz iz LRK znašal 11,3 % tržnega deleža in se prodajne cene niso veliko razlikovale v primerjavi s prejšnjimi leti, je industrija Skupnosti poslovala zadovoljivo, zlasti v smislu dobičkonosnosti.
This evaluation is supported by the fact that even the Community industry had characterised (2002 and) 2003 as a year ‘before the major import penetration by the dumped imports on the Community market’.
Ta ocena temelji na dejstvu, da je tudi industrija Skupnosti označila leti (2002 in) 2003 kot leti „pred vdorom obsežnega dampinškega uvoza na trg Skupnosti“.
This was corroborated by the findings of the investigation and it was thus considered in recital 131 of the provisional Regulation, that 2003 was indeed a year in which there was a normal competitive situation on the Community market.
To je bilo podprto z ugotovitvami preiskave in zato je bilo v uvodni izjavi 131 začasne uredbe upoštevano, da je bilo leto 2003 dejansko leto, v katerem so na trgu Skupnosti vladale normalne konkurenčne razmere.
This had not been contested by any of the interested parties and it would suggest that during 2003, trade distortions, if any, were limited.
Nobena izmed zainteresiranih strank ni tega spodbijala, kar nakazuje, da je bilo v letu 2003 izkrivljanje trgovine, če je sploh obstajalo, zelo omejeno.
In 2004, on the contrary, when imports from the PRC decreased while its sales price remained fairly stable, the Community industrys financial situation suddenly deteriorated dramatically.
Nasprotno pa se je v letu 2004, ko je uvoz iz LRK upadel, njene prodajne cene pa so ostale razmeroma trdne, finančni položaj Skupnosti nenadoma dramatično poslabšal.
Following definitive disclosure, the Community industry claimed that the Commission would erroneously require the dumped imports to be the principal cause of injury.
Po dokončnem razkritju je industrija Skupnosti trdila, da je Komisija napačno želela, da bi bil dampinški uvoz glavni vzrok škode.
In this respect, it is noted that the Commission did not require the dumped imports to be the principle cause of injury.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da Komisija ni želela, da bi bil dampinški uvoz glavni vzrok škode.
Indeed, Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation stipulates that ‘volumes and/or price levels (…) are responsible for an impact on the Community industry (…) and that this impact exists to a degree which enables it to be classified as material (emphasis added).’
Člen 3(6) osnovne uredbe dejansko določa, da morajo biti „obseg in/ali ravni cen (…) odgovorni za učinek na industrijo Skupnosti (…) in (…) učinek tako velik, da ga je mogoče označiti kot znatnega (poševno tiskano besedilo je izpostavljeno za potrebe tega besedila).“
A further analysis of the facts as established during the investigation has shown that the dumped imports, taken in isolation, have had an impact on the injurious situation of the Community industry, but given its overall limited market shares in relation to the increasing market shares of the Community industry and a missing clear coincidence in time between the dumped imports and the most injurious situation of the Community industry, this impact is not considered to be material.
Nadaljnja analiza dejstev, ki so bila ugotovljena med preiskavo, je pokazala, da je dampinški uvoz, obravnavan ločeno, vplival na škodljive razmere v industriji Skupnosti, vendar zaradi na splošno manjših tržnih deležev v primerjavi z rastočimi tržnimi deleži industrije Skupnosti in ker dampinški uvoz ter najbolj škodljive razmere v industriji Skupnosti časovno niso sovpadali, se ta vpliv ne šteje za znatnega.
Based on the above considerations, it cannot be concluded that the dumped imports have had an impact on the injury suffered by the Community industry that can be classified as material.
Na podlagi navedenih premislekov ni mogoče sklepati, da je dampinški uvoz vplival na škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti in bi jo bilo mogoče opredeliti kot znatno.
Effects of other factors
Učinki in drugi dejavniki
Subsequent to the imposition of provisional measures, information was obtained which pointed at the incompleteness of the Eurostat data as regards imports from the USA.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov so bile pridobljene informacije, ki so izpostavile nepopolnost podatkov Eurostata glede uvoza iz ZDA.
The volumes reported appeared to be too low if compared to export data from the USA export database but also to other sources.
Količina, ki je bila navedena, je bila očitno prenizka v primerjavi s podatki o izvozu iz ZDA, prav tako pa tudi v primerjavi z drugimi viri.
The data concerning these imports therefore had to be revised and it was found most appropriate to replace them by the data acquired from the USA export database, whereby the values, converted into Euro, were duly adjusted to CIF Community frontier level.
Podatke, ki so se nanašali na ta uvoz, je bilo zato treba spremeniti in ugotovljeno je bilo, da bi bilo najbolj primerno, da se jih nadomesti s podatki, pridobljenimi iz podatkovne baze o izvozu ZDA, pri čemer so bile vrednosti, ki so bile spremenjene v eure, ustrezno prilagojene vrednostim CIF na meji Skupnosti.
The impact of the revised import volumes from the PRC in 2003 on the calculated Community consumption also affected the market shares of other countries in that year.
Vpliv spremenjene količine uvoza iz LRK za leto 2003 na izračunano potrošnjo Skupnosti je vplival tudi na tržne deleže drugih držav za navedeno leto.
The tables in recital 97 of the provisional Regulation have therefore been amended as follows:
Preglednice v uvodni izjavi 97 začasne uredbe so bile spremenjene, kakor sledi:
Imports originating in other third countries (quantity)
Uvoz iz drugih držav zunaj Skupnosti (v tonah)
Import (tonnes)
Uvoz (v tonah)
Japan
Japonska (%)
Taiwan (ranges)
Tajvan (razpon)