natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Dorohusk – Lubelskie – road and railway border point
Dorohusk – Lubelskie – cestni in železniški mejni prehod
Gdynia – Pomorskie – seaport border point
Gdynia – Pomorskie – pomorski mejni prehod
Gdańsk – Pomorskie – seaport border point
Gdańsk – Pomorskie – pomorski mejni prehod
Medyka – Przemyśl – Podkarpackie – railway border point
Medyka – Przemyśl – Podkarpackie – železniški mejni prehod
Medyka – Podkarpackie – road border point
Medyka – Podkarpackie – cestni mejni prehod
Korczowa – Podkarpackie – road border point
Korczowa – Podkarpackie – cestni mejni prehod
Jasionka – Podkarpackie – airport border point
Jasionka – Podkarpackie – letališki mejni prehod
Szczecin – Zachodnio – Pomorskie – seaport border point
Szczecin – Zachodnio – Pomorskie – pomorski mejni prehod
Świnoujście – Zachodnio – Pomorskie – seaport border point
Świnoujście – Zachodnio – Pomorskie – pomorski mejni prehod
Kołobrzeg – Zachodnio – Pomorskie – seaport border point
Kołobrzeg – Zachodnio – Pomorskie – pomorski mejni prehod
Mazowieckie – Warsaw Airport and custom warehouses – supervised by BSES in Warszawa
Mazowieckie – Letališče Varšava in carinsko skladišče – pod nadzorom PSES Vršava
Custom warehouse – supervised by PSES in Bytom
Carinsko skladišče – pod nadzorom PSES Bytom
Custom warehouse – supervised by PSES in Gliwice
Carinsko skladišče – pod nadzorom PSES Gliwice
Custom warehouse – supervised by PSES in Dąbrowa Górnicza
Carinsko skladišče – pod nadzorom PSES Dąbrowa Górnicza
Custom warehouse – supervised by PSES in Katowice
Carinsko skladišče – pod nadzorom PSES Katowice
Custom warehouse – supervised by PSES in Cieszyn
Carinsko skladišče – pod nadzorom PSES Cieszyn
4 Custom warehouses – supervised by PSES in Poznań
4 carinska skladišča – pod nadzorom PSES Poznań
Custom warehouse – supervised by PSES in Łódź
Carinsko skladišče – pod nadzorom PSES Łódź
Custom warehouse – supervised by PSES in Łowicz
Carinsko skladišče – pod nadzorom PSES Łowicz
Custom warehouse – supervised by PSES in Skierniewice
Carinsko skladišče – pod nadzorom PSES Skierniewice
Custom warehouse – supervised by PSES in Bytów
Carinsko skladišče – pod nadzorom PSES Bytów
Custom warehouse – supervised by PSES in Kraków
Carinsko skladišče – pod nadzorom PSES Kraków
2 Custom warehouses – supervised by PSES in Biała Podlaska
2 carinski skladišči – pod nadzorom PSES Biała Podlaska
Custom warehouse – supervised by PSES in Bolesławiec
Carinsko skladišče – pod nadzorom PSES Bolesławiec
2 Custom warehouses – supervised by PSES in Bydgoszcz
2 carinski skladišči – pod nadzorom PSES Bydgoszcz
Constanta Nord harbour,
Pristanišče Constanta Nord
Constanta Sud harbour,
Pristanišče Constanta Sud
Otopeni International Airport,
Mednarodno letališče Otopeni
Sculeni – on the road,
Sculeni – cesta
Halmeu – on the road
Halmeu – cesta
Siret – on the road,
Siret – cesta
Stamora Moravita – on the road
Stamora Moravita – cesta
Albita – on the road
Albita – cesta
Obrežje – road border crossing
Obrežje – cestni mejni prehod
Koper – port border crossing
Koper – pomorski mejni prehod
Dobova – railway border crossing
Dobova – železniški mejni prehod
Brnik – airport border crossing
Brnik – letališki mejni prehod
Jelšane – road border crossing
Jelšane – cestni mejni prehod
Ljubljana – railway and road border crossing
Ljubljana – železniški in cestni mejni prehod
Gruškovje – road border crossing
Gruškovje – cestni mejni prehod
Sežana – railway and road border crossing
Sežana – železniški in cestni mejni prehod
Belfast, Dover, Felixstowe, Gatwick Airport, Goole, Harwich, Heathrow Airport, Hull, Ipswich, Liverpool, London (including Tilbury, Thamesport and Sheerness), Manchester Airport, Manchester Container Base, Manchester International Freight Terminal, Manchester (Ellesmere Port only), Southampton, Teesport’
Belfast, Dover, Felixstowe, letališče Gatwick, Goole, Harwich, letališče Heathrow, Hull, Ipswich, Liverpool, London (vključno s Tilbury, Thamesport in Sheerness), letališče Manchester, Manchester Container Base, Mednarodni tovorni terminal Manchester, Manchester (samo Ellesmere Port), Southampton, Teesport“
Common document for checks performed on foodstuffs covered by Commission Decision 2006/504/EC
Skupni dokument o pregledih, opravljenih na živilih, ki so zajeta v Odločbi Komisije 2006/504/ES
The consignment of (description of goods) from (third country) covered by the health certificate No issued on has been subjected to the following check (tick off as appropriate 1 or more boxes) with favourable result:
Za pošiljko (opis blaga) iz (tretja država), zajeto v zdravstvenem spričevalu št. , izdanem dne , se je uspešno opravilo naslednje preverjanje (označite ustrezno)
The consignment must not be cleared by customs until accepted and released for free circulation by the competent authority (see part C of the document)
Pošiljka se lahko ocarini šele potem, ko jo pristojni organ sprejme in sprosti v prosti promet (glej del C tega dokumenta)
AT THE POINT OF INTRODUCTION (*)
NA MESTU VNOSA (*)
Import
Uvoz pooblaščenega
Onward transit to designated point of import (***)
Nadaljnji tranzit do uvoznega mesta (***)
Documentary check (**)
Preverjanje dokumentov (**)
AT THE DESIGNATED POINT OF IMPORT
NA POOBLAŠČENEM UVOZNEM MESTU
Identity check (****)
Preverjanje identitete (****)
Identification codes on the certificates and other documents accompanying the consignment correspond to the identification code of individual entities of the consignment
Identifikacijske oznake na potrdilih in drugih spremnih dokumentih pošiljke ustrezajo identifikacijski oznaki njenih posameznih delov
Physical check (sampling and analysis) — results of sampling and analysis enclosed
Fizični pregled (vzorčenje in analize) – priloženi rezultati vzorčenja in analiz
The consignment has been accepted and released for free circulation in the European Community
Pošiljka je bila sprejeta in sproščena v prosti promet v Evropsko skupnost
In case the point of introduction is also the designated point of import, the part B (if relevant) and part C have to be completed.
Če je mesto vnosa tudi pooblaščeno uvozno mesto, je treba izpolniti del B (po potrebi) in del C.
The documentary check consists of checking the commercial documents and if the consignment is accompanied by the health certificate, completed and signed and the results of sampling and analysis.
Preverjanje dokumentov je sestavljeno iz preverjanja trgovskih dokumentov in zahteve, da pošiljko spremljajo izpolnjeno in podpisano zdravstveno spričevalo ter rezultati vzorčenja in analiz.
Also the validity of the health certificate will be verified.
Preverila se bo tudi veljavnost zdravstvenega spričevala.
The signed certificate must be forwarded to the competent authority of the designated point of import.
Podpisano spričevalo je treba poslati pristojnemu organu na pooblaščeno uvozno mesto.
The identity check can also be performed at the point of introduction.’
Identiteta se lahko preveri tudi na mestu vnosa.“
By way of derogation from Article 3(1), Member States shall authorise the imports of consignments which left the country of origin prior to 1 October 2006, accompanied by a health certificate as provided for by Commission Decision 2000/49/EC as regards foodstuffs from Egypt, Commission Decision 2002/79/EC as regards foodstuffs from China, Commission Decision 2002/80/EC as regards foodstuffs from Turkey, Commission Decision 2003/493/EC as regards foodstuffs from Brazil and Commission Decision 2005/85/EC as regards foodstuffs from Iran.6.
Z odstopanjem od člena 3(1) države članice odobrijo uvoz pošiljk, ki so zapustile izvorno državo pred 1. oktobrom 2006 in ki jih spremlja zdravstveno spričevalo iz Odločbe Komisije 2000/49/ES v zvezi z živili iz Egipta, Odločbe Komisije 2002/79/ES v zvezi z živili s Kitajske, Odločbe Komisije 2002/80/ES v zvezi z živili iz Turčije, Odločbe Komisije 2003/493/ES v zvezi z živili iz Brazilije in Odločbe Komisije 2005/85/ES v zvezi z živili iz Irana.6.
Athina, Pireas, Athina International Airport, Thessaloniki, Volos, Nafplio, Patra, Egion, Iraklion Kritis, Larisa, Ioannina, Katerini, Komotini, Veria, Drama, Serres, Kavala, Xanthi, Alexadroupolis
Athina, Pireas, Athina International Airport, Thessaloniki, Volos, Nafplio, Patra, Egion, Iraklion Kritis, Larisa, Ioannina, Katerini, Komotini, Veria, Drama, Serres, Kavala, Xanthi, Alexadroupolis, Rodos
of 4 July 2007
z dne 4. julija 2007
amending Decision 2005/942/EC authorising Member States to take decisions under Council Directive 1999/105/EC on assurances afforded in respect of forest reproductive material produced in third countries
o spremembi Odločbe 2005/942/ES o pooblastilu državam članicam za odločanje v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 1999/105/ES o zagotovilih, danih v zvezi z gozdnim reprodukcijskim materialom, proizvedenim v tretjih državah
(notified under document number C(2007) 3173)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 3173)
Having regard to Council Directive 1999/105/EC of 22 December 1999 on the marketing of forest reproductive material [1], and in particular Article 19(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 1999/105/ES z dne 22. decembra 1999 o trženju gozdnega reprodukcijskega materiala [1] in zlasti člena 19(3) Direktive,
Commission Decision 2005/942/EC [2] authorises Member States to take decisions under Directive 1999/105/EC on assurances afforded in respect of forest reproductive material of specified species produced in specified third countries.
Odločba Komisije 2005/942/ES [2] pooblašča države članice za odločanje v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 1999/105/ES o zagotovilih, danih v zvezi z gozdnim reprodukcijskim materialom, proizvedenim v tretjih državah.
The scope of the current regime should be extended in so far as the necessary assurances are afforded.
Področje uporabe obstoječega režima je treba podaljšati do konca odobrenih potrebnih zagotovil.
It is appropriate to add New Zealand as authorised third country as regards the forest reproductive material of the Category Source identified of the species Pinus radiata and to add that species in the case of the United States of America.
Primerno je dodati Novo Zelandijo kot pooblaščeno tretjo državo v zvezi gozdnim reprodukcijskim materialom kategorije znanega izvora vrste Pinus radiata in dodati to vrsto na seznam za Združene države Amerike.
Decision 2005/942/EC should be therefore amended accordingly.
Odločbo 2005/942/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The Annex to Decision 2005/942/EC is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga k Odločbi 2005/942/ES se spremeni, kakor je določeno v Prilogi k tej odločbi.
Done at Brussels, 4 July 2007.
V Bruslju, 4. julija 2007
The Annex to Decision 2005/942/EC is hereby amended as follows:
Priloga k Odločbi 2005/942/ES se spremeni:
The following is inserted in the table between the entries for Croatia and Norway:
V preglednico se med vnosa za Hrvaško in Norveško vstavi naslednje:
The entry in the table for the United States of America is replaced by the following:
Vnos v preglednici za Združene države Amerike se nadomesti:
United States of America (Washington, Oregon, California)
Združene države Amerike (Washington, Oregon, Kalifornija)
abrogating Decision 2005/186/EC on the existence of an excessive deficit in Malta
o razveljavitvi Odločbe 2005/186/ES o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja na Malti
By Council Decision 2005/186/EC [1], following a recommendation from the Commission in accordance with Article 104(6) of the Treaty, it was decided that an excessive deficit existed in Malta.
Z Odločbo Sveta 2005/186/ES [1], ki je sledila priporočilu Komisije v skladu s členom 104(6) Pogodbe, je bila sprejeta odločitev, da na Malti obstaja čezmerni primanjkljaj.
The Council noted that the general government deficit was 9,7 % of GDP in 2003, of which 2,9 % of GDP was due to a one-off operation, this being above the 3 % of GDP Treaty reference value, while general government gross debt stood at 72 % of GDP and was likely to further diverge from the 60 % of GDP Treaty reference value in 2004.
Svet je opozoril, da je bil leta 2003 javno-finančni primanjkljaj 9,7 % BDP, od tega je bilo 2,9 % BDP rezultat enkratnega posla, kar je nad referenčno vrednostjo 3 % BDP iz Pogodbe, hkrati pa je bruto javno-finančni dolg znašal 72 % BDP in je bilo zelo verjetno, da bo leta 2004 presegel referenčno vrednost 60 % BDP iz Pogodbe.
On 5 July 2004, in accordance with Article 104(7) of the Treaty and Article 3(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 of 7 July 1997 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure [2], the Council addressed a recommendation to Malta with a view to bringing the excessive deficit situation to an end by 2006 at the latest.
Svet je 5. julija 2004 v skladu s členom 104(7) Pogodbe in členom 3(4) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1467/97 z dne 7. julija 1997 o pospešitvi in razjasnitvi izvajanja postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem [2] na Malto naslovil priporočilo, v skladu s katerim naj bi ta država stanje čezmernega primanjkljaja odpravila najpozneje do leta 2006.
In accordance with Article 104(12) of the Treaty, a Council Decision on the existence of an excessive deficit is to be abrogated when the excessive deficit in the Member State concerned has, in the view of the Council, been corrected.
V skladu s členom 104(12) Pogodbe je treba odločitev Sveta o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja razveljaviti, če se je čezmerni primanjkljaj v zadevni državi članici po njegovem mnenju ustrezno odpravil.
As part of the application of the Protocol, Member States are to notify data on government deficits and debt and other associated variables twice a year, namely before 1 April and before 1 October, in accordance with Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 3605/93 of 22 November 1993 on the application of the Protocol on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community [3].
Države članice v okviru uporabe tega protokola dvakrat na leto sporočajo podatke o javno-finančnem primanjkljaju in dolgu ter drugih s tem povezanih spremenljivkah, in sicer pred 1. aprilom in pred 1. oktobrom, v skladu s členom 4 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 3605/93 z dne 22. novembra 1993 o uporabi Protokola o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti [3].
Based on data provided by the Commission (Eurostat) in accordance with Article 8g(1) of Regulation (EC) No 3605/93 following the notification by Malta before 1 April 2007 and on the Commission services’ spring 2007 forecast, the following conclusions are warranted:
Na podlagi podatkov, ki jih je po sporočilu Malte pred 1. aprilom 2007 zagotovila Komisija (Eurostat) v skladu s členom 8g(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 3605/93, in spomladanske napovedi služb Komisije za leto 2007 je ugotovljeno naslednje:
The general government deficit was reduced from 10 % of GDP in 2003 to 2,6 % of GDP in 2006, which is below the 3 % of GDP deficit reference value.
javno-finančni primanjkljaj se je zmanjšal z 10 % BDP leta 2003 na 2,6 % BDP leta 2006, kar je pod referenčno vrednostjo primanjkljaja 3 % BDP.
This is slightly better than the target set for 2006 in the January 2006 update of the convergence programme, although somewhat above the targets endorsed by the Council in its recommendation under Article 104(7),
To je nekoliko bolje od cilja iz posodobljene različice programa za konvergenco iz januarja 2006, čeprav nekoliko nad cilji, ki jih je odobril Svet v svojem priporočilu v skladu s členom 104(7),
More than half (around four percentage points) of the 7,4 percentage points of GDP reduction in the deficit ratio between 2003 and 2006 was accounted for by higher revenue, reflecting changes in indirect taxation as well as more efficient tax collection.
več kot polovica (okoli štiri odstotne točke) od zmanjšanja deleža primanjkljaja za 7,4 odstotne točke BDP med letoma 2003 in 2006 je rezultat večjih prihodkov, ki so odraz sprememb posredne obdavčitve in učinkovitejšega pobiranja davkov.
A lower ratio of expenditure to GDP explains the remaining 3,5 percentage points, in part reflecting higher recourse to one-off operations, namely sales of land, which are conventionally recorded as negative expenditure.
Nižja vrednost razmerja med odhodki in BDP razloži preostale 3,5 odstotne točke, kar delno odraža pogostejše zatekanje k enkratnim poslom, namreč prodaja zemljišča, kar se običajno beleži kot negativni odhodki.
One-off deficit-reducing operations averaged around 1 % of GDP between 2004 and 2006.
povprečje enkratnih poslov za zmanjševanje primanjkljaja je znašalo okoli 1 % BDP med letoma 2004 in 2006.
Without one-offs (0,7 % of GDP), the 2006 deficit would have remained above the reference value, at 3,3 % of GDP.
Brez enkratnih ukrepov (v višini 0,7 % BDP) bi primanjkljaj za leto 2006 ostal nad referenčno vrednostjo, in sicer pri 3,3 % BDP.
The improvement in the structural balance, being the cyclically-adjusted balance net of one-off and other temporary measures, in 2006 is estimated at slightly above 1 % of GDP,
Izboljšanje strukturnega salda, torej ciklično prilagojeni čisti saldo enkratnih in drugih začasnih ukrepov leta 2006 je ocenjeno na nekoliko več od 1 % BDP,
For 2007, the Commission services’ spring 2007 forecast projects that the deficit will be reduced further, to 2,1 % of GDP, driven by additional expenditure savings.
v spomladanski napovedi služb Komisije za leto 2007 je predvideno, da se bo primanjkljaj leta 2007 zaradi dodatnih prihrankov pri odhodkih še naprej zmanjševal do vrednosti 2,1 % BDP.
One-offs are envisaged to amount to 0,6 % of GDP, broadly similar in magnitude to the preceding year, so that without one-offs the deficit would be below the reference value.
Enkratni ukrepi naj bi znašali 0,6 % BDP, kar je na splošno podobno razponu v preteklem letu, tako da bi bil primanjkljaj brez enkratnih ukrepov pod referenčno vrednostjo.
This is broadly in line with the official deficit estimate of 1,9 % of GDP set in the April 2007 notification.
To je na splošno v skladu z uradno oceno primanjkljaja v višini 1,9 % BDP, določeno v obvestilu iz aprila 2007.
For 2008, the spring forecast projects, on a no-policy-change basis, a further decline in the deficit to 1,6 % of GDP without recourse to one-offs.
Za leto 2008 spomladanska napoved ob nespremenjeni politiki predvideva nadaljnje zmanjšanje primanjkljaja na 1,6 % BDP (brez enkratnih ukrepov).
This indicates that the deficit has been brought below the 3 % of GDP ceiling in a credible and sustainable manner.
To kaže, da se je primanjkljaj verodostojno in trajnostno znižal pod zgornjo mejo 3 % BDP.
The structural balance is projected to improve marginally in 2007 and, on the basis of a scenario without changes of policy, by an additional percentage point in 2008.
Strukturni saldo se bo po napovedi nekoliko izboljšal v letu 2007 in ob nespremenjeni politiki še za odstotno točko v letu 2008.
This has to be seen against the need to make progress towards the medium-term objective for the budgetary position, which for Malta is a balanced budget position in structural terms,
Pri tem je treba upoštevati potrebo po doseganju srednjeročnega cilja za proračunsko stanje, ki je za Malto uravnoteženo proračunsko stanje v strukturnem smislu,
Government debt declined from its peak of 73,9 % of GDP in 2004 to 66,5 % in 2006.
javni dolg se je zmanjšal z najvišje vrednosti 73,9 % BDP leta 2004 na 66,5 % leta 2006.
According to the Commission services’ spring 2007 forecast, the debt ratio is projected to fall further to around 64,3 % by the end of 2008, thus coming closer to the 60 % of GDP reference value.
Glede na spomladansko napoved služb Komisije za leto 2007 se pričakuje, da se bo javni dolg še naprej zmanjševal in bo do konca leta 2008 znašal okoli 64,3 %, s čimer se bo približal referenčni vrednosti 60 % BDP.
In the view of the Council, the excessive deficit in Malta has been corrected and Decision 2005/186/EC should therefore be abrogated,
Po mnenju Sveta je bil čezmerni primanjkljaj na Malti odpravljen, zato je treba razveljaviti Odločbo 2005/186/ES –
From an overall assessment it follows that the excessive deficit situation in Malta has been corrected.
Iz celovite ocene sledi, da je čezmerni primanjkljaj na Malti odpravljen.
Decision 2005/186/EC is hereby abrogated.
Odločba 2005/186/ES se razveljavi.
Done at Luxembourg, 5 June 2007.
V Luxembourgu, 5. junija 2007
OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 21.
UL L 62, 9.3.2005, str. 21.
The expenditure ratio would have declined by less if the substantial one-off expenditure-increasing operation related to the restructuring of the shipyards of around 3 % of GDP in 2003 is excluded.
Znižanje deleža odhodkov bi bilo manjše brez upoštevanja znatnega enkratnega posla, ki je povečal odhodke in je povezan s prestrukturiranjem dveh ladjedelnic v višini okoli 3 % BDP v letu 2003.
In addition, expenditure restraint was achieved through downsizing and restructuring of public entities, restrictions in hiring in the public service and control in social payments.
Poleg tega je bila dosežena omejitev odhodkov z racionalizacijo in prestrukturiranjem javnih subjektov, z omejitvijo pri zaposlovanju v javnem sektorju in nadzorom nad socialno pomočjo,
abrogating Decision 2004/917/EC on the existence of an excessive deficit in Greece
o razveljavitvi Odločbe 2004/917/ES o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja v Grčiji
By Council Decision 2004/917/EC [1], following a recommendation from the Commission in accordance with Article 104(6) of the Treaty, it was decided that an excessive deficit existed in Greece.
Z Odločbo Sveta 2004/917/ES [1], ki je sledila priporočilu Komisije v skladu s členom 104(6) Pogodbe, je bila sprejeta odločitev, da v Grčiji obstaja čezmerni primanjkljaj.
The Council noted that the general government deficit was 3,2 % of GDP in 2003, above the 3 % of GDP Treaty reference value, while general government gross debt stood at 103 % of GDP, well above the 60 % of GDP Treaty reference value.
Svet je opozoril, da je bil leta 2003 javno-finančni primanjkljaj 3,2 % BDP, kar je nad referenčno vrednostjo 3 % BDP iz Pogodbe, hkrati je bruto javno-finančni dolg znašal 103 % BDP, kar je precej nad referenčno vrednostjo 60 % BDP iz Pogodbe.
Figures on general government deficit and general government gross debt for 2003 were revised on several occasions subsequent to Decision 2004/917/EC.
Podatki o javno-finančnem primanjkljaju in bruto javno-finančnem dolgu za leto 2003 so bili še po Odločbi 2004/917/ES večkrat popravljeni.
According to the most recent data, the deficit and debt represented 6,2 % of GDP and 107,8 % of GDP respectively.
Glede na najnovejše podatke znaša primanjkljaj 6,2 % BDP, dolg pa 107,8 % BDP.
On 6 July 2004, in accordance with Article 104(7) of the Treaty and Article 3(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 of 7 July 1997 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure [2], the Council addressed a recommendation to Greece with a view to bringing the excessive deficit situation to an end by 2005 at the latest.
Svet je 6. julija 2004 v skladu s členom 104(7) Pogodbe in členom 3(4) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1467/97 z dne 7. julija 1997 o pospešitvi in razjasnitvi izvajanja postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem [2] na Grčijo naslovil priporočilo, v skladu s katerim naj bi Grčija odpravila stanje čezmernega primanjkljaja najpozneje do leta 2005.
On 19 January 2005, by Council Decision 2005/334/EC [3], in accordance with Article 104(8), the Council decided, based on a recommendation from the Commission, that Greece had not taken effective action in response to the Council recommendation under Article 104(7).
Svet je 19. januarja 2005 z Odločbo Sveta 2005/334/ES [3], v skladu s členom 104(8) in na podlagi priporočila Komisije sklenil, da Grčija ni sprejela učinkovitih ukrepov v odgovor na priporočilo Sveta v skladu s členom 104(7).