natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Under Article 143(1) of the Rules of Procedure, the President may, on application within the period prescribed by that provision, allow a reply to be submitted if it is necessary in order to enable the appellant to put forward his point of view or in order to provide a basis for the decision on the appeal.
Predsednik lahko na predlog, podan v roku, ki je določen v členu 143(1) Poslovnika, v skladu s to določbo dovoli vložitev replike, če je ta potrebna za to, da tožeča stranka brani svoje stališče, oziroma za pripravo odločbe o pritožbi.
Save in exceptional circumstances, such an application must not exceed 2 to 3 pages and must be confined to summarising the precise reasons for which, in the appellant's opinion, a reply is necessary.
Taka vloga, razen v izjemnih primerih, ne sme biti daljša od 2 do 3 strani in mora biti omejena na kratek povzetek posebnih razlogov, zaradi katerih je po mnenju tožeče stranke replika potrebna.
The request must be intelligible in itself, without necessitating reference to the appeal or to the response.
Predlog mora biti sam po sebi razumljiv, ne da bi bilo treba vpogledati v pritožbeno vlogo ali odgovor na pritožbo.
Applications for hearing of oral argument in appeal proceedings
Predlogi za ustno obravnavo v postopku s pritožbo
The Court may decide to rule on the appeal without an oral procedure, unless one of the parties submits an application to be heard within the period prescribed under Article 146 of the Rules of Procedure.
Sodišče prve stopnje lahko odloči, da ne bo opravilo ustnega postopka, razen če ena od strank vloži predlog, da se ji omogoči, da ustno pojasni svoja stališča v roku, določenem v členu 146 Poslovnika.
The application must set out the reasons for which the party wishes to be heard.
V predlogu je treba navesti razloge, zaradi katerih želi stranka ustno podati navedbe.
That reasoning must be based on a real assessment of the benefit of a hearing to the party in question and must indicate the elements of the file or arguments which that party considers it necessary to develop or disprove more fully at a hearing.
Obrazložitev mora izhajati iz konkretne presoje koristnosti ustnega podajanja navedb za zadevno stranko in v njej je treba navesti dele spisa ali trditve, za katere ta stranka meni, da jih je treba dodatno pojasniti ali zavrniti na obravnavi.
It is not sufficient to provide a general statement of reasons referring to the importance of the case or of the questions to be decided.
Ne zadostuje splošna obrazložitev, ki se sklicuje na pomembnost zadeve ali vprašanj, o katerih je treba odločiti.
Applications for legal aid
Vloga za pravno pomoč
The use of a form in making an application for legal aid is compulsory.
Za vložitev vloge za pravno pomoč je obvezna uporaba obrazca.
The form is available on the website of the Court of Justice at www.curia.europa.eu.
Obrazec je dostopen na spletni strani Sodišča na elektronskem naslovu www.curia.europa.eu.
The form may also be obtained on request from the Registry of the Court of First Instance (Tel. (352) 4303 3477), either by sending an email stating the applicant's name and address to CFI.Registry@curia.europa.eu, or by writing to the following address:
Za obrazec se lahko zaprosi tudi pri sodnem tajništvu (telefon: (352) 4303-3477) z elektronskim dopisom na naslov CFI.Registry@curia.europa.eu, pri čemer je treba navesti ime in naslov, oziroma z dopisom, naslovljenim na:
Registry of the Court of First Instance
Sodno tajništvo Sodišča prve stopnje
Any request for legal aid submitted otherwise than by using the application form will not be taken into consideration and will give rise to a reply from the Registrar reiterating that the use of the form is compulsory and attaching a copy of the form.
Vloga za pravno pomoč, ki ni vložena na obrazcu, ne bo upoštevana. Na tako vlogo bo sodno tajništvo odgovorilo, da je uporaba obrazca obvezna, odgovoru pa bo priložen obrazec.
The original application for legal aid must be signed by the legal aid applicant or by his lawyer.
Izvirnik vloge za pravno pomoč mora podpisati prosilec ali njegov odvetnik.
If the application for legal aid is submitted by the legal aid applicant's lawyer before the application initiating proceedings has been lodged, the application for legal aid must be accompanied by documentation certifying that the lawyer is authorised to practise before a Court of a Member State or of another State which is a party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area.
Če vlogo za pravno pomoč vloži odvetnik prosilca pred vložitvijo pravnega sredstva, mora biti k njej priložen dokument, ki potrjuje, da je odvetnik upravičen za zastopanje pred sodišči države članice ali druge države pogodbenice Sporazuma EGP.
The application form is intended to provide the Court, in accordance with Article 95(2) of the Rules of Procedure, with the information required to give an effective decision on the application for legal aid.
Obrazec naj bi Sodišču prve stopnje omogočil, da v skladu s članom 95(2) Poslovnika pridobi podatke, potrebne za pravilno odločitev o vlogi za pravno pomoč.
The information required concerns:
To so:
the legal aid applicant's economic situation;
podatki o premoženjskem stanju prosilca
where the action has not yet been brought, the subject-matter of the action, the facts of the case and the arguments relating thereto.
če pravno sredstvo še ni bilo vloženo, podatki v zvezi s predmetom tega pravnega sredstva, zadevnimi dejstvi in trditvami v tej zvezi.
Together with the form, the legal aid applicant is required to produce documentary evidence to support his assertions.
Prosilec mora skupaj z obrazcem predložiti ustrezna dokazila, ki potrjujejo njegove navedbe.
The duly completed form and supporting documents must be intelligible in themselves without necessitating reference to any other letters lodged at the Registry by the legal aid applicant.
Pravilno izpolnjen obrazec in dokazila morajo biti razumljivi sami po sebi, ne da bi bilo treba vpogledati v morebitne druge dopise, ki jih je Sodišču prve stopnje predložil prosilec.
Without prejudice to the Court's power to request information or the production of further documents under Article 64 of the Rules of Procedure, the application for legal aid may not be supplemented by the subsequent lodgment of addenda. Such addenda will be returned, unless they have been lodged at the request of the Court.
Brez izkoriščenja možnosti, da Sodišče prve stopnje zahteva podatke ali predložitev dodatnih dokumentov na podlagi člena 64 Poslovnika, vloge za pravno pomoč ni mogoče dopolniti z vložitvijo poznejšega dodatka; taki dodatki, če so bili vloženi, ne da bi jih Sodišče prve stopnje zahtevalo, bodo vrnjeni.
In exceptional cases, supporting documents intended to establish the applicant's lack of means may nevertheless be accepted subsequently, subject to the delay in their production being adequately explained.
V izjemnih primerih je mogoče dokazila o šibkem premoženjskem stanju prosilca vseeno sprejeti pozneje, če je pozna vložitev primerno pojasnjena.
Under Article 96(4) of the Rules of Procedure, the introduction of an application for legal aid is to suspend the period prescribed for the bringing of the action to which the application refers until the date of notification of the order making a decision on that application or, where no lawyer is designated in that order to represent the person concerned, until the date of service of the order designating the lawyer instructed to represent the legal aid applicant.
Na podlagi člena 96(4) Poslovnika z vložitvijo vloge za pravno pomoč neha teči rok za vložitev pravnega sredstva, na katerega se vloga nanaša, in sicer do dneva vročitve sklepa, s katerim je o tej vlogi odločeno, ali sklepa o določitvi odvetnika, ki bo prosilca zastopal.
The suspension shall take effect from the date on which the form is lodged or, where the request for legal aid is submitted without using the form, from the date on which that request is lodged, provided that the form is returned within the period prescribed by the Registry to that effect in the letter referred to at point 85 above.
Prekinitev začne veljati od datuma vložitve obrazca ali, če je vloga za pravno pomoč vložena brez uporabe obrazca, od dneva vložitve te vloge, če se obrazec pošlje v roku, ki ga v ta namen določi sodno tajništvo v dopisu, navedenem v točki 85 zgoraj.
If the form is not returned within the prescribed period, the suspension shall take effect from the date on which the form is lodged.
Če obrazec ni poslan v določenem roku, začne prekinitev veljati od dneva vložitve obrazca.
Where the form is lodged by fax or email, the signed original must reach the Registry of the Court no more than 10 days after such lodgment, in order for the date of lodgment of the fax or email to be taken into account in the suspension of the time-limit for bringing an action.
V primeru vložitve obrazca po telefaksu ali elektronski pošti mora sodno tajništvo Sodišča prve stopnje prejeti podpisan izvirnik najpozneje deset dni po vložitvi, da se za prekinitev roka za vložitev pravnega sredstva upošteva datum vložitve po telefaksu ali elektronski pošti.
If the original form is not lodged within that 10-day period, the suspension of the time-limit for bringing an action shall take effect on the date on which the original form is lodged.
Če izvirnik ni vložen v roku desetih dni, začne prekinitev veljati na datum vložitve izvirnika.
In the event of any discrepancy between the signed original and the copy previously lodged, only the signed original will be taken into account, and the relevant date for the purpose of suspension of the time-limit for bringing an action will be the date on which that original was lodged.
V primeru odstopanja med podpisanim izvirnikom in predhodno vloženim prepisom se bo upošteval le podpisan izvirnik, za datum prekinitve roka za vložitev pravnega sredstva pa se bo štel datum vložitve izvirnika.
The oral procedure exists:
Namen ustnega postopka je:
where necessary, to reiterate in condensed form the position taken by the parties, emphasising the key submissions advanced in writing,
zelo skrajšana ponovitev, če je potrebno, stališč, tako da se poudarijo bistveni razlogi, navedeni pisno,
to clarify, if necessary, certain arguments advanced during the written procedure and to submit any new arguments prompted by recent events which arose after the close of the written procedure and which could not therefore have been set out in the pleadings,
po potrebi pojasniti določene trditve, navedene v pisnem postopku, in predstaviti morebitne nove trditve, ki izhajajo iz novejših dogodkov, ki so se zgodili po koncu pisnega postopka in ki jih zato ni bilo mogoče navesti v vlogah,
to reply to any questions put by the Court.
odgovoriti na morebitna vprašanja Sodišča prve stopnje.
It is for Counsel to each party to assess, in the light of the purpose of the oral procedure, as defined in point 93 above, whether oral argument is really necessary or whether it would be sufficient simply to refer to the pleadings or written observations.
Vsak svetovalec mora ob upoštevanju namena ustnega postopka, kot je bil opredeljen v prejšnji točki, presoditi, ali so ustne navedbe resnično koristne oziroma ali bi zadostovalo zgolj sklicevanje na pisna stališča ali pisne vloge.
The oral procedure can then concentrate on the replies to questions put by the Court.
Ustni postopek se torej lahko osredotoči na odgovore na vprašanja Sodišča prve stopnje.
If Counsel does consider it necessary to address the Court, he may always confine himself to making specific points and referring to the pleadings in relation to other points.
Če svetovalec meni, da mora prevzeti besedo, se lahko vedno omeji na predstavitev določenih točk in se sklicuje na vloge glede drugih.
If a party refrains from presenting oral argument, this will never be construed as constituting acquiescence in the oral argument presented by another party where the arguments in question have already been refuted in writing.
Če se stranka vzdrži ustnih navedb, se njen molk nikoli ne bo razlagal kot strinjanje z navedbami druge stranke, če so bile zadevne trditve že posredovane v pisni obliki.
Such silence will not preclude that party from responding to the other party's submission.
Molk te stranke ne bo oviral pri odgovoru na navedbe druge stranke.
In some cases, the Court may consider it preferable to start the oral procedure with questions put by its Members to Counsel for the parties.
Sodišče prve stopnje lahko pod določenimi pogoji odloči, da je bolje začeti ustni postopek z vprašanji, ki jih njegovi člani postavijo svetovalcem strank.
In that case, Counsel are requested to take this into account if they then wish to make a brief address.
V tem primeru morajo slednji to upoštevati, če želijo zatem podati kratko ustno navedbo.
In the interests of clarity and in order to enable the Members of the Court to understand oral submissions better, it is generally preferable for Counsel to speak freely on the basis of notes rather than to read out a written text.
Zaradi jasnosti in da bi članom Sodišča prve stopnje zagotovili boljše razumevanje ustnih navedb, je na splošno bolj priporočljiv prosti govor na podlagi zapiskov kot pa branje besedila.
Counsel for the parties are also requested to simplify their presentation of the case as far as possible; a series of short sentences will always be preferable to a long, complicated sentence.
Prav tako se od svetovalcev strank zahteva, naj čim bolj poenostavijo svojo predstavitev zadeve. Vedno je bolje uporabiti več kratkih povedi kot pa dolge in zapletene povedi.
It would also assist the Court if Counsel could structure their oral argument and indicate, before developing it, the structure they intend to adopt.
Poleg tega bi svetovalci Sodišču prve stopnje olajšali delo, če bi svoje ustne navedbe strukturirali in bi predhodno natančno predstavili, kako nameravajo podati navedbe.
If, however, the submission is prepared in writing, it is advisable to bear in mind when drafting it that it will have to be presented orally and should therefore resemble a spoken text as much as possible.
Če so ustne navedbe vendarle pripravljene v pisni obliki, je priporočljivo, da se pri sestavljanju besedila upošteva dejstvo, da mora biti to predstavljeno v ustni obliki in se mora kar najbolj približati govoru.
To facilitate interpretation, agents and lawyers are requested to send any text or written notes for their submissions to the Directorate for Interpretation in advance either by fax ((+352) 4303 3697) or by e-mail (interpret@curia.europa.eu).
Da se tolmačem olajša delo, se zastopnike in odvetnike naproša, naj oddelku za tolmačenje predhodno posredujejo morebitno besedilo ali zapiske svojih ustnih navedb bodisi po telefaksu ((352) 4303-3697) bodisi po elektronski pošti (interpret@curia.europa.eu).
Any notes for submissions thus transmitted will be treated in the strictest confidence.
Zaupnost posredovanih besedil ustnih navedb je zagotovljena.
To avoid any misunderstanding, the name of the party must be stated.
Da bi se izognili vsakršnim nesporazumom, je treba navesti ime stranke.
Notes for submissions will not be placed on the case-file.
Besedil ustnih navedb se ne posreduje v spis zadeve.
Counsel are reminded that, depending on the case being heard, only some of the Members of the bench will be following the oral argument in the language in which it is being presented; the other Members will be listening to the simultaneous interpretation.
Svetovalce se opominja, da, odvisno od primera, le določeni člani Sodišča prve stopnje spremljajo ustne navedbe v jeziku, v katerem se podajajo, in da preostali poslušajo simultano tolmačenje.
In the interests of the better conduct of the proceedings and of maintaining the quality of the simultaneous interpretation, Counsel are strongly advised to speak slowly and directly into the microphone.
Svetovalcem se v interesu dobrega poteka postopka in ohranjanja ravni kakovosti simultanega tolmačenja svetuje, naj govorijo počasi in v mikrofon.
Where Counsel intend to cite verbatim passages from certain texts or documents, particularly passages not appearing in the documents before the Court, it would be helpful if they would indicate the passages concerned to the interpreters before the hearing.
Če nameravajo svetovalci dobesedno navajati odlomke določenih besedil ali dokumentov, zlasti odstavkov, ki niso omenjeni v spisu, je priporočljivo, da se to tolmačem sporoči pred obravnavo.
Similarly, it may be helpful to draw the ‘interpreters’ attention to any terms which may be difficult to translate.
Ravno tako je dobro opozoriti na morebiti težko prevedljive izraze.
As the courtrooms are equipped with an automatic sound amplification system, Counsel must press the button on the microphone in order to switch it on and wait for the light to come on before starting to speak.
Razpravne dvorane Sodišča prve stopnje so opremljene z avtomatičnim sistemom ozvočenja, svetovalce se naproša, da pritisnejo na gumb mikrofona, da ga vključijo in počakajo, da se prižge lučka, preden začnejo govoriti.
The button should not be pressed while a Member of the Court or another person is speaking, in order not to cut off his or her microphone.
Medtem ko ima besedo sodnik ali druga oseba, se je treba izogibati pritiskom na gumb, da jim ne bi izklopili mikrofona.
The time taken in presenting oral submissions may vary, depending on the complexity of the case and on whether or not new facts have arisen.
Trajanje podajanja se razlikuje glede na zapletenost zadeve in obstoj ali neobstoj novih dejstev.
The lawyers or agents of the main parties are requested to limit their oral submissions to 15 minutes or thereabouts for each party, and those of any intervener to 10 minutes, unless the Registry has indicated otherwise.
Odvetniki in zastopniki glavnih strank morajo podajanje ustnih navedb omejiti na približno 15 minut za vsako stranko in 10 minut za interveniente, razen če jim sodno tajništvo v zvezi s tem ni dalo drugih navodil.
These limitations apply only to the presentation of oral argument itself and not to time spent in answering questions put at the hearing.
Ta omejitev velja le za same ustne navedbe in ne vključuje časa, potrebnega za odgovarjanje na vprašanja, postavljena na obravnavi.
If circumstances so require, a request for leave to exceed the speaking time normally allowed, giving reasons and indicating the speaking time considered necessary, may be made to the Registry at least 15 days (or less, in duly substantiated exceptional circumstances) before the date fixed for the hearing.
Če je zaradi okoliščin to potrebno, se na sodno tajništvo lahko naslovi predlog za odobritev izjeme od tega običajnega trajanja, ki ga treba ustrezno obrazložiti in ob tem navesti čas podajanja ustnih navedb, ki naj bi bil potreben, in sicer najmanj petnajst dni pred datumom obravnave (oziroma v izjemnih, ustrezno obrazloženih okoliščinah, tudi kasneje).
When such requests are made, Counsel for the parties will be informed of the time which they will have for presenting their oral submissions.
Svetovalce se obvesti o času trajanja ustnih navedb, ki ga bodo imeli na voljo na podlagi teh predlogov.
Where a party is represented by more than one Counsel, no more than two of them may normally present argument and their combined speaking time must not exceed the time-limits indicated above.
Če eno stranko zastopa več svetovalcev, lahko ustne navedbe načeloma predstavita največ dva izmed njih, celotna dolžina trajanja njunih ustnih navedb pa ne sme prekoračiti zgoraj navedenega časa za besedo.
However, Counsel other than those who addressed the Court may answer questions from Members of the Court and reply to observations of other Counsel.
Odgovore na vprašanja sodnikov in replike drugim svetovalcem dajejo tudi svetovalci, ki niso predstavili ustnih navedb.
Where two or more parties are advancing the same argument before the Court (a situation which may arise where, in particular, there are interventions or where cases have been joined), their Counsel are requested to confer with each other before the hearing in order to avoid any repetition.
Kadar več strank zagovarja enako stališče pred Sodiščem prve stopnje (zlasti pri intervencijah in združenih zadevah), se lahko njihovi svetovalci pred obravnavo posvetujejo, da bi se tako izognili kakršnemu koli ponavljanju ustnih navedb.
The Report for the Hearing is drawn up by the Judge-Rapporteur and provides an objective summary of the case. It does not set out every detail of the ‘parties’ arguments but is meant to enable the parties to check that their pleas and arguments have been properly understood and to facilitate study of the documents before the Court by the other Members of the bench hearing the case.
Poročilo za obravnavo, ki ga sestavi sodnik poročevalec, je objektivni povzetek spora, ki ne povzema vseh razsežnosti trditev strank in katerega namen je omogočiti strankam, da preverijo, ali so njihovi tožbeni razlogi in navedbe pravilno povzeti, in drugim sodnikom v sestavi olajšati študij spisa.
The Court will make every effort to ensure that Counsel for the parties receive the Report for the Hearing at least three weeks before the hearing.
Sodišče prve stopnje pošlje poročilo za obravnavo svetovalcem strank tri tedne pred obravnavo.
The sole purpose of this document is to prepare the hearing for the oral procedure.
Namen poročila za obravnavo je zgolj pripraviti narok za ustno obravnavo.
If the Report for the Hearing contains factual errors, Counsel are requested to notify them to the Registry in writing before the hearing.
Če so v poročilu za obravnavo napake glede dejstev, se svetovalce naproša, naj pred obravnavo o tem pisno obvestijo sodno tajništvo.
Similarly, if it does not correctly convey the essence of a party's argument, Counsel for that party may propose the amendments they consider appropriate.
Prav tako lahko svetovalci predlagajo spremembe, za katere menijo, da so potrebne, če poročilo za obravnavo ne povzema pravilno trditev ene stranke.
If at the hearing Counsel submit oral observations on the Report for the Hearing, these will be recorded by the Registrar or acting Registrar.
Če svetovalci podajo ustne navedbe glede poročila za obravnavo na obravnavi, jih vpiše sodni tajnik ali njegov namestnik.
When citing a judgment of the Court of Justice, the Court of First Instance or the Civil Service Tribunal, Counsel are requested to give all the references, including the names of the parties, and, where relevant, to state the number of the page of the European Court Reports (ECR) on which the passage in question appears.
Svetovalce se naproša, naj, kadar se sklicujejo na sodbo Sodišča, Sodišča prve stopnje ali Sodišča za uslužbence, navedejo vse reference, vključno z imeni strank, in navedejo, odvisno od primera, stran v Zbirki odločb, na kateri se nahaja zadevni odstavek.
The Court will accept documents submitted at the hearing only in exceptional circumstances and only after the parties have been heard in that regard.
Sodišče prve stopnje sprejme dokumente, predložene na obravnavi, le izjemoma in le po predhodnem zaslišanju strank.
A request to use particular technical means for the purposes of a presentation must be made in good time.
Prošnja za uporabo določenih tehničnih sredstev pri predstavitvi mora biti podana v razumnem času.
Arrangements for such use of technology should be made with the Registrar, so that any technical or practical constraints can be taken into account.
Sodno tajništvo določi podrobnosti o uporabi teh sredstev ob upoštevanju morebitnih tehničnih ali praktičnih omejitev.
ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THESE PRACTICE DIRECTIONS
ZAČETEK VELJAVNOSTI TEH PRAKTIČNIH NAVODIL
The Practice Directions to parties of 14 March 2002 (OJ L 87, 4.4.2002, p. 48) and the ‘Notes for the guidance of counsel at the hearing of oral argument’ are hereby revoked and replaced by these Practice Directions.
Ta praktična navodila razveljavljajo in nadomeščajo praktična navodila za stranke z dne 14. marca 2002 (UL L 87, 4.4.2002, str. 48) ter „Priročnik za svetovalce strank v ustnem postopku“.
These Practice Directions shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta praktična navodila se objavijo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.