natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
in accordance with Chapter III of Annex II to Directive 90/539/EEC and were not found to infected, or showed any grounds for suspecting infection, by these agents;
v skladu s poglavjem III Priloge II k Direktivi 90/539/EGS in za katere se je ugotovilo, da niso okužene ali da ne kažejo suma okužbe z navedenimi dejavniki;
either [(e) [have not been vaccinated against Newcastle disease;]
ali (e) [niso bile cepljene proti atipični kokošji kugi;]
on … against… (repeat as necessary)]
dne … proti … (po potrebi ponoviti)]
have been marked as indicated in point I.28 of the certificate using … (colour ink)
da so bila označena, kot je navedeno v točki I.28 spričevala z uporabo … (barvno črnilo)
have been disinfected in accordance with my instructions, using…(name of the product and active substance) for … (time in minutes);
da so bila razkužena v skladu z mojimi navodili z uporabo … (ime proizvoda in aktivne snovi) za …(čas v minutah);
were collected from… to … (dates).
da so bila pobrana od … do … (datumi).
where the consignment is intended for a Member State or region the status of which has been established in accordance with Article 12(2) of Directive 90/539/EEC, the hatching eggs described this certificate are derived from poultry which:
če je pošiljka namenjena v državo članico ali regijo, katere status se ugotovi v skladu s členom 12(2) Direktive 90/539/EGS, valilna jajca opisana v tem spričevalu, izvirajo od perutnine, ki:
either (a) have not been vaccinated against Newcastle disease,
ali (a) ni bila cepljena proti atipični kokošji kugi,
or (b) have been vaccinated against Newcastle disease using an inactivated vaccine,
ali (b) je bila cepljena proti atipični kokošji kugi z uporabo inaktiviranega cepiva,
or (c) were vaccinated against Newcastle disease using a live vaccine at the latest 60 days before the date mentioned under point II.1.7 above.]
ali (c) je bila cepljena proti atipični kokošji kugi z uporabo živega cepiva najpozneje 60 dni pred začetnim datumom, navedenim v točki II.1.7 zgoraj;]
[The Salmonella control programme referred to in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 2160/2003 and specific requirements for the use of antimicrobials and vaccines in Regulation (EC) No 1177/2006, have been applied to the parent flock of origin and this parent flock has been tested for Salmonella serotypes of public health significance.
[Program nadzora za Salmonello iz člena 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 2160/2003 in posebne zahteve za uporabo protimikrobnih sredstev in cepiv iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1177/2006 so se uporabile za starševsko jato izvora in ta starševska jata je bila testirana na serotipe Salmonelle, pomembne za javno zdravje.
Date of last sampling of the parent stock from which the testing result is known: …
Datum zadnjega vzorčenja starševske jate, za katero je znan rezultat testiranja: …
Neither Salmonella Enteritidis nor Salmonella Typhimurium were detected within the control programme referred to in point II.2.4.
V okviru programa nadzora iz točke II.2.4 nista bili odkriti niti Salmonella Enteritidis niti Salmonella Typhimurium.
I, the undersigned official veterinarian, further certify that a lthough the use of vaccines against Newcastle disease which do not fulfil the specific requirements of Annex B(2) to Decision 93/342/EEC is not prohibited in … (2), the poultry from which the hatching eggs are derived:
Spodaj podpisani uradni veterinar potrjujem tudi, da čeprav uporaba cepiv proti atipični kokošji kugi, ki ne izpolnjujejo posebnih zahtev iz Priloge B(2) k Odločbi 93/342/EGS, ni prepovedana v … (2), perutnina, iz katere izvirajo valilna jajca:
has been kept in isolation under official surveillance on the holding of origin in the 14-day period mentioned in (b).]
je bila v osami pod uradnim nadzorom na gospodarstvu izvora v času 14 dni, navedenem v (b).]
the containers and vehicles in which the boxes mentioned in II.4.1 have been transported have been cleaned and disinfected before loading in accordance with the instructions of the competent authority.
da so bili zabojniki in vozila, namenjeni za prevoz škatel iz točke II.4.1, pred natovarjanjem očiščeni in razkuženi v skladu z navodili pristojnega organa.
Box I.28 (Category): select one of the following: Pure line/grandparents/parents/laying pullets/eggs of turkeys for consumption/others; (Identification system and identification number): indroduce the egg mark.
Rubrika I.28 (kategorija): izberite eno od naslednjih: čistopasemska, stari starši, starši, mlade kokoši nesnice, jajca puranov za prehrano, drugo. (identifikacijski sistem in identifikacijska številka): vpišite oznako jajc.
For hatching eggs of poultry as defined in Decision 2006/696/EC [as last amended] with the exception of ratites.
Za valilna jajca perutnine, kakor je določeno z Odločbo 2006/696/ES (kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena) razen ratitov.
The guarantees given under points II.2.4 and II.2.5 only apply to the poultry which belongs to the species Gallus gallus.
Jamstva iz točk II.2.4 in II.2.5 veljajo le za perutnino iz vrste Gallus gallus.
In Part 1 of Annex II to Decision 2006/696/EC, the entries for Bulgaria and Romania are deleted.
V delu 1 Priloge II k Odločbi 2006/696/ES se črtajo vnosi za Bolgarijo in Romunijo.
Without prejudice to specific certification requirements provided for in Community agreements with third countries.
Brez poseganja v posebne zahteve v zvezi s spričevali, ki so določene v sporazumih Skupnosti s tretjimi državami.
Certificates in accordance with the agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products, OJ L 114, 30.4.2002, p. 132.’
Spričevala v skladu s Sporazumom med Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o trgovini s kmetijskimi proizvodi, UL L 114, 30.4.2002, str. 132.“
Address Approval number
Naslov Številka odobritve
(notified under document number C(2007) 6702)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 6702)
Germany has notified the Commission of an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N1 in a backyard holding on its territory and has taken the appropriate measures as provided for in Decision 2006/415/EC, including the establishment of Areas A and B as provided for in Article 4 of that Decision.
Nemčija je obvestila Komisijo o izbruhu visoko patogene aviarne influence podtipa H5N1 na gospodarstvu z dvoriščno rejo na svojem ozemlju in sprejela ustrezne ukrepe, kot jih določa Odločba 2006/415/ES, vključno z vzpostavitvijo območij A in B, kot določa člen 4 navedene odločbe.
Done at Brussels, 17 December 2007.
V Bruslju, 17. decembra 2007
Directive as last amended by Directive 2004/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 157, 30.4.2004, p. 33); corrected version (OJ L 195, 2.6.2004, p. 12).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2004/41/ES (UL L 157, 30.4.2004, str. 33). Popravljena različica v (UL L 195, 2.6.2004, str. 12).
The 10 km zone established around the outbreak in the commune of Großwoltersdorf including all or parts of the communes of:
Območje 10 km okoli kraja izbruha v občini Großwoltersdorf, vključno z vsemi občinami ali deli občin:
Council Decision 2007/845/JHA
Sklep Sveta 2007/845/PNZ
concerning cooperation between Asset Recovery Offices of the Member States in the field of tracing and identification of proceeds from, or other property related to, crime
o sodelovanju med uradi za odvzem premoženjske koristi držav članic na področju sledenja in identifikacije premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, ali drugega premoženja, povezanega s kaznivimi dejanji
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 30(1)(a) and (b) and 34(2)(c) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti členov 30(1)(a) in (b) in 34(2)(c) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Austria and the Republic of Finland,
ob upoštevanju pobude Republike Avstrije, Kraljevine Belgije in Republike Finske,
The main motive for cross-border organised crime is financial gain.
Glavni motiv čezmejnega organiziranega kriminala je finančni dobiček.
This financial gain is a stimulus for committing further crime to achieve even more profit.
Čezmejni organizirani kriminal spodbuja storilce k nadaljnjim kaznivim dejanjem, da bi dosegli še večji dobiček.
Accordingly, law enforcement services should have the necessary skills to investigate and analyse financial trails of criminal activity.
Skladno s tem morajo imeti službe kazenskega pregona potrebno strokovno znanje za preiskavo in analizo finančnih sledi kriminalnih dejavnosti.
To combat organised crime effectively, information that can lead to the tracing and seizure of proceeds from crime and other property belonging to criminals has to be exchanged rapidly between the Member States of the European Union.
Za učinkovit boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu morajo države članice Evropske Unije hitro izmenjavati informacije, ki lahko prispevajo k sledenju in zasegu premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, in drugega premoženja, ki pripada storilcem kaznivih dejanj.
The Council adopted Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA of 22 July 2003 on the execution in the European Union of orders freezing property or evidence [2] and Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA of 24 February 2005 on Confiscation of Crime-Related Proceeds, Instrumentalities and Property [3], dealing with certain aspects of judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the field of the freezing and confiscation of the proceeds from, instrumentalities of, and other property related to, crime.
Svet je sprejel Okvirni sklep 2003/577/PNZ z dne 22. julija 2003 o izvrševanju sklepov o zasegu premoženja ali dokazov v Evropski uniji [2] in Okvirni sklep 2005/212/PNZ z dne 24. februarja 2005 o zaplembi premoženjske koristi, pripomočkov in premoženja, ki so povezani s kaznivimi dejanji [3], ki urejata nekatere vidike pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah na področju zamrznitve in zaplembe premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, pripomočkov in drugega premoženja, povezanega s kaznivimi dejanji.
Close cooperation is necessary between the relevant authorities of the Member States involved in the tracing of illicit proceeds and other property that may become liable to confiscation and provision should be made allowing for direct communication between those authorities.
Potrebno je tesno sodelovanje med pristojnimi organi držav članic, ki so udeleženi pri sledenju nezakonite premoženjske koristi in drugega premoženja, ki ga je mogoče zapleniti, treba pa bi bilo zagotoviti tudi možnosti za neposredno obveščanje med temi organi.
To that end, Member States should have national Asset Recovery Offices in place which are competent in these fields, and should ensure that these offices can exchange information rapidly.
V ta namen bi morale države članice vzpostaviti nacionalne urade za odvzem premoženjske koristi, ki bi imeli pristojnosti na teh področjih, in zagotoviti, da lahko ti uradi hitro izmenjavajo informacije.
The Camden Assets Recovery Inter-Agency Network (CARIN) established at The Hague on 22-23 September 2004 by Austria, Belgium, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands and the United Kingdom already constitutes a global network of practitioners and experts with the intention of enhancing mutual knowledge on methods and techniques in the area of cross-border identification, freezing, seizure and confiscation of the proceeds from, and other property related to, crime.
Camdenska mreža uradov za odvzem premoženjske koristi (Camden Assets Recovery Inter-Agency Network (CARIN)), ki so jo Avstrija, Belgija, Nemčija, Irska, Nizozemska in Združeno kraljestvo ustanovili 22. in 23. septembra 2004 v Haagu, že predstavlja globalno mrežo uradnikov in strokovnjakov; njen namen je izboljšati medsebojno poznavanje metod in tehnik na področju čezmejne identifikacije, zamrznitve, zasega in zaplembe premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, in drugega premoženja, povezanega s kaznivimi dejanji.
This Decision should complete the CARIN by providing a legal basis for the exchange of information between Asset Recovery Offices of all the Member States.
Ta sklep bi moral z vzpostavitvijo pravne podlage za izmenjavo informacij med uradi za odvzem premoženjske koristi v vseh državah članicah dopolniti CARIN.
In its Communication to the Council and the European Parliament ‘The Hague Programme: Ten Priorities for the next five years’, the Commission advocated strengthening tools to address the financial aspects of organised crime, inter alia, by promoting the establishment of criminal asset intelligence units in Member States.
V Sporočilu Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu „Haaški program: Deset prednostnih nalog za naslednjih pet let“ je Komisija priporočila tudi krepitev orodij za obravnavanje finančnih vidikov organiziranega kriminala, med drugim s spodbujanjem vzpostavitve obveščevalnih enot za kazenske zadeve v državah članicah.
Cooperation between the Asset Recovery Offices and between the Asset Recovery Offices and other authorities charged with the facilitation of the tracing and identification of proceeds of crime should take place on the basis of the procedures and time limits provided for in Council Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA of 18 December 2006 on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union [4], including the grounds for refusal contained therein.
Sodelovanje med uradi za odvzem premoženjske koristi ter med uradi za odvzem premoženjske koristi in drugimi organi, pristojnimi za lažje sledenje in identifikacijo premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, poteka na podlagi postopkov in rokov, ki so predvideni v Okvirnem sklepu Sveta 2006/960/PNZ z dne 18. decembra 2006 o poenostavitvi izmenjave informacij in obveščevalnih podatkov med organi kazenskega pregona držav članic Evropske unije [4], vključno z razlogi za zavrnitev, določenimi v navedenem okvirnem sklepu.
This Decision should be without prejudice to the cooperation arrangements under Council Decision 2000/642/JHA of 17 October 2000 concerning arrangements for cooperation between financial intelligence units of the Member States in exchanging information [5] and to existing arrangements for police cooperation,
Ta sklep ne bi smel posegati v dogovore o sodelovanju v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/642/PNZ z dne 17. oktobra 2000 o dogovoru glede sodelovanja med enotami za finančni nadzor (FIU-ji) držav članic pri izmenjavi informacij [5] ter v obstoječe dogovore glede policijskega sodelovanja –
Asset Recovery Offices
Uradi za odvzem premoženjske koristi
Each Member State shall set up or designate a national Asset Recovery Office, for the purposes of the facilitation of the tracing and identification of proceeds of crime and other crime related property which may become the object of a freezing, seizure or confiscation order made by a competent judicial authority in the course of criminal or, as far as possible under the national law of the Member State concerned, civil proceedings.
Vsaka država članica ustanovi ali imenuje nacionalni urad za odvzem premoženjske koristi, ki je pristojen za lažje sledenje in identifikacijo premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, in drugega premoženja, povezanega s kaznivimi dejanji, ki sta lahko predmet sklepa o zamrznitvi ali zasegu ali o zaplembi s strani pristojnega pravosodnega organa, v teku kazenskega ali – kolikor je to možno v skladu z nacionalnim pravom zadevne države članice – civilnega postopka.
Without prejudice to paragraph 1, a Member State may, in conformity with its national law, set up or designate two Asset Recovery Offices.
Brez poseganja v odstavek 1 lahko država članica v skladu z nacionalnim pravom ustanovi ali imenuje dva nacionalna urada za odvzem premoženjske koristi.
Where a Member State has more than two authorities charged with the facilitation of the tracing and identification of proceeds of crime, it shall nominate a maximum of two of its Asset Recovery Offices as contact point(s).
Če sta v neki državi članici več kot dva organa pristojna za lažje sledenje in identifikacijo premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, ta država članica kot točki za stike imenuje največ dva urada za odvzem premoženjske koristi.
Member States shall indicate the authorities which are the national Asset Recovery Offices within the meaning of this Article.
Države članica imenujejo urade, ki so nacionalni uradi za odvzem premoženjske koristi v smislu tega člena.
They shall notify this information and any subsequent changes to the General Secretariat of the Council in writing.
Države članice o tem in o kakršnih koli naknadnih spremembah pisno uradno obvestijo generalni sekretariat Sveta.
This notification shall not preclude other authorities which are charged with the facilitation of the tracing and identification of proceeds of crime from exchanging information under Articles 3 and 4 with an Asset Recovery Office of another Member State.
To uradno obvestilo drugim organom, pristojnim za lažje sledenje in identifikacijo premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, ne preprečuje izmenjave informacij v skladu s členoma 3 in 4 z uradom za odvzem premoženjske koristi druge države članice.
Cooperation between Asset Recovery Offices
Sodelovanje med uradi za odvzem premoženjske koristi
Member States shall ensure that their Asset Recovery Offices cooperate with each other for the purposes set out in Article 1(1), by exchanging information and best practices, both upon request and spontaneously.
Države članice zagotovijo, da njihovi uradi za odvzem premoženjske koristi medsebojno sodelujejo za doseganje namenov, navedenih v členu 1(1), tako da si na zaprosilo ali spontano izmenjujejo informacije in najboljše prakse.
Member States shall ensure that this cooperation is not hampered by the status of the Asset Recovery Offices under national law, regardless of whether they form part of an administrative, law enforcement or a judicial authority.
Države članice zagotovijo, da status uradov za odvzem premoženjske koristi po nacionalnem pravu ne ovira tega sodelovanja, ne glede na to, ali so del upravnega organa, organa pregona ali pravosodnega organa.
Exchange of information between Asset Recovery Offices on request
Izmenjava informacij med uradi za odvzem premoženjske koristi na zaprosilo
An Asset Recovery Office of a Member State or other authorities in a Member State charged with the facilitation of the tracing and identification of proceeds of crime may make a request to an Asset Recovery Office of another Member State for information for the purposes set out in Article 1(1).
Urad za odvzem premoženjske koristi države članice ali drug organ v državi članici, zadolžen za lažje sledenje in identifikacijo premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, lahko zaprosi urad za odvzem premoženjske koristi druge države članice za informacije za namene, navedene v členu 1(1).
To that end it shall rely on Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA and on the rules adopted in implementation thereof.
Pri tem se sklicuje na Okvirni sklep 2006/960/PNZ in pravila, sprejeta za njegovo izvajanje.
When filling out the form provided for under Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA, the requesting Asset Recovery Office shall specify the object of and the reasons for the request and the nature of the proceedings.
Pri izpolnjevanju obrazca iz Okvirnega sklepa 2006/960/PNZ urad za odvzem premoženjske koristi, ki je zaprosil za informacije, točno navede tudi predmet zaprosila in razloge zanj ter vrsto postopka.
It shall also provide details on property targeted or sought (bank accounts, real estate, cars, yachts and other high value items) and/or the natural or legal persons presumed to be involved (e.g. names, addresses, dates and places of birth, date of registration, shareholders, headquarters).
Urad prav tako posreduje podrobnosti o ciljnem oziroma iskanem premoženju (bančni računi, nepremičnine, vozila, jahte in drugi predmeti velike vrednosti) in/ali o domnevno vpletenih fizičnih ali pravnih osebah (npr. imena, naslovi, datumi in kraji rojstva, datum registracije, podatke o delničarjih in sedežih podjetij).
Such details shall be as precise as possible.
Te podrobnosti so kar se da natančne.
Spontaneous exchange of information between Asset Recovery Offices
Spontana izmenjava informacij med uradi za odvzem premoženjske koristi
Asset Recovery Offices or other authorities charged with the facilitation of the tracing and identification of proceeds of crime may, within the limits of the applicable national law and without a request to that effect, exchange information which they consider necessary for the execution of the tasks of another Asset Recovery Office in pursuance of purpose set out in Article 1(1).
Uradi za odvzem premoženjske koristi ali drugi organi, pristojni za lažje sledenje in identifikacijo premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, lahko – v mejah veljavnega nacionalnega prava in brez zaprosila – izmenjujejo informacije, o katerih menijo, da so potrebne za izvajanje nalog drugega urada za odvzem premoženjske koristi za doseganje namenov, navedenih v členu 1(1).
Article 3 shall apply to the exchange of information under this Article mutatis mutandis.
Za izmenjavo informacij po tem členu se smiselno uporablja člen 3.
Each Member State shall ensure that the established rules on data protection are applied also within the procedure on exchange of information provided for by this Decision.
Vsaka država članica zagotovi, da se uveljavljena pravila o varstvu podatkov uporabljajo tudi v postopku izmenjave informacij iz tega sklepa.
The use of information which has been exchanged directly or bilaterally under this Decision shall be subject to the national data protection provisions of the receiving Member State, where the information shall be subject to the same data protection rules as if they had been gathered in the receiving Member State.
Uporabo informacij, ki so bile v skladu s tem sklepom izmenjane neposredno ali na dvostranski ravni, urejajo nacionalne določbe o varstvu podatkov države članice prejemnice, v kateri informacije urejajo enaka pravila o varstvu podatkov, kot če bi se zbrale v tej isti državi članici prejemnici.
The personal data processed in the context of the application of this Decision shall be protected in accordance with the Council of Europe Convention of 28 January 1981 for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, and, for those Member States which have ratified it, the Additional Protocol of 8 November 2001 to that Convention, regarding Supervisory Authorities and Transborder Data Flows.
Osebni podatki, ki se obdelujejo v okviru uporabe tega sklepa, se varujejo v skladu s Konvencijo Sveta Evrope z dne 28. januarja 1981 o varstvu posameznikov glede na avtomatsko obdelavo osebnih podatkov in, za tiste države članice, ki so ta dodatni protokol ratificirale, v skladu z Dodatnim protokolom k tej konvenciji z dne 8. novembra 2001 o nadzornih organih in čezmejnem prenosu podatkov.
The principles of Recommendation No R(87) 15 of the Council of Europe Regulating the Use of Personal Data in the Police Sector should also be taken into account when law enforcement authorities handle personal data obtained under this Decision.
Organi kazenskega pregona pri ravnanju z osebnimi podatki, pridobljenimi v skladu s tem sklepom, upoštevajo načela Priporočila Sveta Evrope št. R(87)15 o uporabi osebnih podatkov v policijskem sektorju.
Exchange of best practices
Izmenjava najboljših praks