natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore for the purposes of this Regulation non-contractual obligation should be understood as an autonomous concept.
Zato bi se moral za namene te uredbe izraz nepogodbena obveznost razumeti kot avtonomen pojem.
The conflict-of-law rules set out in this Regulation should also cover non-contractual obligations arising out of strict liability.
Kolizijska pravila, določena v tej uredbi, bi morala zajemati tudi nepogodbene obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz objektivne odgovornosti.
The law applicable should also govern the question of the capacity to incur liability in tort/delict.
Pravo, ki se uporablja, bi moralo urejati tudi vprašanje sposobnosti prevzemanja odgovornosti za škodno dejanje.
Uniform rules applied irrespective of the law they designate may avert the risk of distortions of competition between Community litigants.
Z enotnimi pravili, uporabljenimi ne glede na pravo, katerega uporabo določajo, se lahko prepreči tveganje izkrivljanja konkurence med pravdnima strankama Skupnosti.
The requirement of legal certainty and the need to do justice in individual cases are essential elements of an area of justice.
Zahteva po pravni varnosti in potreba po pravičnem ravnanju v posameznih primerih sta bistvena elementa na področju pravosodja.
This Regulation provides for the connecting factors which are the most appropriate to achieve these objectives.
Ta uredba določa navezne okoliščine, ki so najprimernejše za dosego teh ciljev.
Therefore, this Regulation provides for a general rule but also for specific rules and, in certain provisions, for an ‘escape clause’ which allows a departure from these rules where it is clear from all the circumstances of the case that the tort/delict is manifestly more closely connected with another country.
Ta uredba zato določa splošno pravilo, pa tudi posebna pravila ter, v določenih določbah, „odstopno klavzulo“, ki dovoljuje odstopanje od teh pravil, kadar je iz vseh okoliščin primera razvidno, da je škodno dejanje očitno v tesnejši zvezi z drugo državo.
This set of rules thus creates a flexible framework of conflict-of-law rules.
Ta pravila torej tvorijo prilagodljiv okvir kolizijskih pravil.
Equally, it enables the court seised to treat individual cases in an appropriate manner.
Prav tako pa omogočajo sodišču, ki vodi primer, da posamezne primere ustrezno obravnava.
The principle of the lex loci delicti commissi is the basic solution for non-contractual obligations in virtually all the Member States, but the practical application of the principle where the component factors of the case are spread over several countries varies.
Načelo lex loci delicti commissi pomeni temeljno rešitev v zvezi z nepogodbenimi obveznostmi v skoraj vseh državah članicah, vendar je praktična uporaba tega načela v primeru razpršenosti dejavnikov primera na več držav lahko različna.
This situation engenders uncertainty as to the law applicable.
Takšno stanje ogroža pravno varnost glede prava, ki se uporabi.
Uniform rules should enhance the foreseeability of court decisions and ensure a reasonable balance between the interests of the person claimed to be liable and the person who has sustained damage.
Enotna pravila izboljšajo predvidljivost sodnih odločb in zagotovijo razumno ravnotežje med interesi osebe, za katero se zatrjuje, da nosi odgovornost, in osebe, ki je utrpela škodo.
A connection with the country where the direct damage occurred (lex loci damni) strikes a fair balance between the interests of the person claimed to be liable and the person sustaining the damage, and also reflects the modern approach to civil liability and the development of systems of strict liability.
Povezava z državo, v kateri je neposredna škoda nastala (lex loci damni), vzpostavi pravično ravnotežje med interesi osebe, za katero se zatrjuje, da nosi odgovornost, in osebe, ki je utrpela škodo, in tudi odraža sodoben pristop k civilnopravni odgovornosti in k razvoju sistemov objektivne odgovornosti.
The law applicable should be determined on the basis of where the damage occurs, regardless of the country or countries in which the indirect consequences could occur.
Pravo, ki se uporablja, bi se moralo določiti na podlagi tega, kje je nastala škoda, ne glede na državo ali države, v katerih lahko pride do posrednih posledic.
Accordingly, in cases of personal injury or damage to property, the country in which the damage occurs should be the country where the injury was sustained or the property was damaged respectively.
Zato bi morala biti v primerih telesne poškodbe ali materialne škode na premoženju država, v kateri je nastala škoda, tista država, v kateri je prišlo do telesne poškodbe ali kjer je nastala materialna škoda na premoženju.
The general rule in this Regulation should be the lex loci damni provided for in Article 4(1).
Splošno pravilo iz te uredbe bi moralo biti „lex loci damni“ iz člena 4(1).
Article 4(2) should be seen as an exception to this general principle, creating a special connection where the parties have their habitual residence in the same country.
Izjema od tega splošnega načela je člen 4(2), saj vzpostavlja posebno povezavo, kadar imata stranki običajno prebivališče v isti državi.
Article 4(3) should be understood as an ‘escape clause’ from Article 4(1) and (2), where it is clear from all the circumstances of the case that the tort/delict is manifestly more closely connected with another country.
Določbo člena 4(3) bi bilo treba razumeti kot „odstopno klavzulo“ glede na člen 4(1) in (2), kadar je iz vseh okoliščin primera razvidno, da je škodno dejanje očitno v tesnejši zvezi z drugo državo.
Specific rules should be laid down for special torts/delicts where the general rule does not allow a reasonable balance to be struck between the interests at stake.
Treba bi bilo določiti posebna pravila za primere posebnih škodnih dejanj, kjer splošno pravilo ne omogoča razumnega ravnotežja med zadevnimi interesi.
The conflict-of-law rule in matters of product liability should meet the objectives of fairly spreading the risks inherent in a modern high-technology society, protecting consumers' health, stimulating innovation, securing undistorted competition and facilitating trade.
V zvezi z odgovornostjo za izdelke naj bi kolizijsko pravilo upoštevalo cilje pravične razdelitve tveganja, ki je del sodobne družbe z visoko razvito tehnologijo, varovanja zdravja potrošnikov, spodbujanja inovacij, zagotavljanja neizkrivljene konkurence in poenostavitve trgovine.
Creation of a cascade system of connecting factors, together with a foreseeability clause, is a balanced solution in regard to these objectives.
Uravnotežena rešitev v zvezi s temi cilji je vzpostavitev kaskadnega sistema povezovanja dejavnikov skupaj s klavzulo predvidljivosti.
The first element to be taken into account is the law of the country in which the person sustaining the damage had his or her habitual residence when the damage occurred, if the product was marketed in that country.
Prvi dejavnik, ki ga je treba upoštevati, je pravo države, v kateri je imela oseba, ki je utrpela škodo, v času nastale škode običajno prebivališče, če se je izdelek tržil v tej državi.
The other elements of the cascade are triggered if the product was not marketed in that country, without prejudice to Article 4(2) and to the possibility of a manifestly closer connection to another country.
Drugi elementi v kaskadnem sistemu se sprožijo, če se izdelek ni tržil v tej državi, brez poseganja v člen 4(2) in v možnost očitno tesnejše zveze z drugo državo.
The special rule in Article 6 is not an exception to the general rule in Article 4(1) but rather a clarification of it.
Posebno pravilo iz člena 6 ni izjema od splošnega pravila iz člena 4(1), ampak zgolj njegovo pojasnilo.
In matters of unfair competition, the conflict-of-law rule should protect competitors, consumers and the general public and ensure that the market economy functions properly.
V zadevah glede nelojalne konkurence bi moralo kolizijsko pravilo varovati konkurente, potrošnike in splošno javnost ter zagotavljati pravilno delovanje tržnega gospodarstva.
The connection to the law of the country where competitive relations or the collective interests of consumers are, or are likely to be, affected generally satisfies these objectives.
Povezava s pravom države, v kateri so razmerja med konkurenti ali skupni interesi potrošnikov prizadeti ali bi lahko bili prizadeti, je na splošno v skladu s temi cilji.
The non-contractual obligations arising out of restrictions of competition in Article 6(3) should cover infringements of both national and Community competition law.
Nepogodbene obveznosti, nastale zaradi omejevanja konkurence iz člena 6(3), bi morale zajemati kršitve tako nacionalnega konkurenčnega prava kot konkurenčnega prava Skupnosti.
The law applicable to such non-contractual obligations should be the law of the country where the market is, or is likely to be, affected.
Pravo, ki se uporablja za takšne nepogodbene obveznosti, bi moralo biti pravo države, na katere trgu ima, ali bi lahko imela, taka omejitev učinek.
In cases where the market is, or is likely to be, affected in more than one country, the claimant should be able in certain circumstances to choose to base his or her claim on the law of the court seised.
Kadar ima taka omejitev učinek na trgu več kot ene države, bi se lahko v določenih okoliščinah oseba, ki zahteva odškodnino, odločila, da bo za podlago svoje tožbe izbrala pravo sodišča, pri katerem je tožbo vložila.
For the purposes of this Regulation, the concept of restriction of competition should cover prohibitions on agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within a Member State or within the internal market, as well as prohibitions on the abuse of a dominant position within a Member State or within the internal market, where such agreements, decisions, concerted practices or abuses are prohibited by Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty or by the law of a Member State.
Za namene te uredbe, bi moral pojem omejevanja konkurence vključevati prepoved sporazumov med podjetji, odločitev podjetniških združenj in usklajenih ravnanj, katerih cilj ali posledica je preprečevanje, omejevanje ali izkrivljanje konkurence v državi članici ali na notranjem trgu, kakor tudi prepoved zlorabe prevladujočega položaja v državi članici ali na notranjem trgu, kadar so takšni sporazumi, odločitve, usklajena ravnanja ali zlorabe prepovedane s členoma 81 in 82 Pogodbe ali z zakonodajo države članice.
‘Environmental damage’ should be understood as meaning adverse change in a natural resource, such as water, land or air, impairment of a function performed by that resource for the benefit of another natural resource or the public, or impairment of the variability among living organisms.
„Okoljska škoda“ bi morala pomeniti škodljive spremembe naravnih virov, kot so voda, tla in zrak, ali okrnitev katere od funkcij teh naravnih virov v prid drugega naravnega vira ali javnosti, kakor tudi zmanjšanje raznolikosti živih organizmov.
Regarding environmental damage, Article 174 of the Treaty, which provides that there should be a high level of protection based on the precautionary principle and the principle that preventive action should be taken, the principle of priority for corrective action at source and the principle that the polluter pays, fully justifies the use of the principle of discriminating in favour of the person sustaining the damage.
Glede okoljske škode, člen 174 Pogodbe, ki določa, da bi bilo treba doseči visoko raven varstva, ki temelji na načelu previdnosti in načelih, da bi bilo treba delovati preventivno, da je treba okoljsko škodo prednostno odpravljati pri viru in da mora plačati povzročitelj obremenitve, popolnoma upravičuje uporabo načela diskriminacije v korist osebe, ki je utrpela škodo.
The question of when the person seeking compensation can make the choice of the law applicable should be determined in accordance with the law of the Member State in which the court is seised.
Vprašanje, kdaj lahko oseba, ki zahteva odškodnino, izbira pravo, ki naj se uporabi, bi bilo treba določiti v skladu s pravom države članice, v kateri je sodišče, kjer poteka postopek.
Regarding infringements of intellectual property rights, the universally acknowledged principle of the lex loci protectionis should be preserved.
Glede kršitev pravic intelektualne lastnine bi bilo treba ohraniti splošno priznano načelo lex loci protectionis.
For the purposes of this Regulation, the term ‘intellectual property rights’ should be interpreted as meaning, for instance, copyright, related rights, the sui generis right for the protection of databases and industrial property rights.
Za namene te uredbe bi bilo treba izraz „pravice intelektualne lastnine“ razlagati v pomenu, na primer, avtorske pravice, sorodne pravice, pravice sui generis za varstvo zbirk podatkov ter pravice industrijske lastnine.
The exact concept of industrial action, such as strike action or lock-out, varies from one Member State to another and is governed by each Member State’s internal rules.
Točna vsebina pojma „protestnega delovanja“ delavcev ali delodajalcev, kot je stavka ali izprtje, se v državah članicah razlikuje in je urejena v skladu z notranjimi predpisi vsake države članice.
Therefore, this Regulation assumes as a general principle that the law of the country where the industrial action was taken should apply, with the aim of protecting the rights and obligations of workers and employers.
Zaradi tega ta uredba temelji na splošnem načelu, da se uporablja pravo države, v kateri je prišlo do takega delovanja delavcev ali delodajalcev, s ciljem, da se zaščitijo njihove pravice in obveznosti.
The special rule on industrial action in Article 9 is without prejudice to the conditions relating to the exercise of such action in accordance with national law and without prejudice to the legal status of trade unions or of the representative organisations of workers as provided for in the law of the Member States.
Posebno pravilo o protestnem delovanju delavcev ali delodajalcev iz člena 9 ne posega v pogoje v zvezi z izvedbo takega delovanja v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo ter ne posega v pravni status predstavniških organizacij delavcev ali sindikatov, kakor je predvideno v nacionalni zakonodaji držav članic.
Provision should be made for special rules where damage is caused by an act other than a tort/delict, such as unjust enrichment, negotiorum gestio and culpa in contrahendo.
Treba bi bilo predvideti posebna pravila za primere, kjer škodo povzroči dejanje, ki ni škodno dejanje, na primer neupravičena obogatitev, negotiorum gestio in culpa in contrahendo.
Culpa in contrahendo for the purposes of this Regulation is an autonomous concept and should not necessarily be interpreted within the meaning of national law.
Culpa in contrahendo je za namene te uredbe avtonomen pojem, za katerega ni nujno, da se razlaga v okviru pomena, ki ga ima v nacionalnem pravu.
It should include the violation of the duty of disclosure and the breakdown of contractual negotiations.
Vključeval naj bi kršitev dolžnosti razkritja in prekinitev pogodbenih pogajanj.
Article 12 covers only non-contractual obligations presenting a direct link with the dealings prior to the conclusion of a contract.
Člen 12 zajema le nepogodbene obveznosti, ki predstavljajo neposredno povezavo z dejanji pred sklenitvijo pogodbe.
This means that if, while a contract is being negotiated, a person suffers personal injury, Article 4 or other relevant provisions of this Regulation should apply.
To pomeni, da se uporabljajo člen 4 ali druge ustrezne določbe te uredbe, če oseba med pogajanji o pogodbi utrpi telesno poškodbo.
To respect the principle of party autonomy and to enhance legal certainty, the parties should be allowed to make a choice as to the law applicable to a non-contractual obligation.
Zaradi upoštevanja načela avtonomije strank in večje pravne varnosti bi morali stranki imeti možnost izbrati, katero pravo se bo uporabljalo za nepogodbene obveznosti.
This choice should be expressed or demonstrated with reasonable certainty by the circumstances of the case.
Ta izbira bi morala biti izražena izrecno ali pa bi morala dovolj nedvoumno izhajati iz okoliščin primera.
Where establishing the existence of the agreement, the court has to respect the intentions of the parties.
Ko se ugotavlja obstoj sporazuma, mora sodišče spoštovati voljo strank.
Protection should be given to weaker parties by imposing certain conditions on the choice.
Da bi zaščitili šibkejšo stranko, bi bilo treba izbiro prava omejiti z nekaterimi pogoji.
Considerations of public interest justify giving the courts of the Member States the possibility, in exceptional circumstances, of applying exceptions based on public policy and overriding mandatory provisions.
Upoštevanje javnega interesa upravičuje, da lahko sodišča držav članic v izjemnih okoliščinah uporabijo izjeme na podlagi javnega reda in prevladujočih obveznih določb.
In particular, the application of a provision of the law designated by this Regulation which would have the effect of causing non-compensatory exemplary or punitive damages of an excessive nature to be awarded may, depending on the circumstances of the case and the legal order of the Member State of the court seised, be regarded as being contrary to the public policy (ordre public) of the forum.
Zlasti uporaba določb prava, kakor to določa ta uredba, ki bi povzročila dodelitev nesorazmerne eksemplarične ali kazenske odškodnine, odvisno od okoliščin primera ali pravnega reda države članice sodišča, kjer je bila vložena tožba, bi lahko veljala za nasprotujočo si z javnem redom („ordre public“) pristojnega sodišča.
According to the current national rules on compensation awarded to victims of road traffic accidents, when quantifying damages for personal injury in cases in which the accident takes place in a State other than that of the habitual residence of the victim, the court seised should take into account all the relevant actual circumstances of the specific victim, including in particular the actual losses and costs of after-care and medical attention.
Kadar do nesreče pride v državi, v kateri žrtev nima običajnega prebivališča, bi moralo sodišče, pri katerem je vložena tožba, po veljavnih nacionalnih pravilih o odškodninah za žrtve prometnih nesreč pri oceni škode v primeru telesnih poškodb upoštevati vse relevantne dejanske okoliščine posamezne žrtve, kar bi naj vključevalo zlasti dejanske izgube in stroške poznejše pomoči in zdravniške oskrbe.
In order to strike a reasonable balance between the parties, account must be taken, in so far as appropriate, of the rules of safety and conduct in operation in the country in which the harmful act was committed, even where the non-contractual obligation is governed by the law of another country.
Prizadevanje za razumno ravnotežje med strankama zahteva, da se, kolikor je to primerno, upoštevajo pravila o varnosti in ravnanju, ki veljajo v državi, v kateri je bilo povzročeno škodno dejanje, četudi se za nepogodbeno obveznost uporablja drugo pravo.
The term ‘rules of safety and conduct’ should be interpreted as referring to all regulations having any relation to safety and conduct, including, for example, road safety rules in the case of an accident.
Izraz „pravila o varnosti in ravnanju“ bi bilo treba razumeti tako, da se nanaša na vse predpise, ki so v kakršni koli povezavi z varnostjo in ravnanjem, vključno na primer s predpisi o varnosti v cestnem prometu v primeru nesreče.
A situation where conflict-of-law rules are dispersed among several instruments and where there are differences between those rules should be avoided.
Treba bi se bilo izogibati stanju razpršenosti kolizijskih pravil med več instrumenti in obstoju razlik med temi pravili.
This Regulation, however, does not exclude the possibility of inclusion of conflict-of-law rules relating to non-contractual obligations in provisions of Community law with regard to particular matters.
Vendar pa ta uredba ne izključuje možnosti vključitve kolizijskih pravil za nepogodbene obveznosti v določbe predpisov Skupnosti v zvezi z določenimi zadevami.
This Regulation should not prejudice the application of other instruments laying down provisions designed to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market in so far as they cannot be applied in conjunction with the law designated by the rules of this Regulation.
Ta uredba ne sme vplivati na uporabo drugih instrumentov, ki opredeljujejo določbe, katerih namen je spodbujati pravilno delovanje notranjega trga, če se te določbe ne morejo uporabljati skupaj s pravom, določenim s pravili te uredbe.
The application of provisions of the applicable law designated by the rules of this Regulation should not restrict the free movement of goods and services as regulated by Community instruments, such as Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on electronic commerce) [6].(36) Respect for international commitments entered into by the Member States means that this Regulation should not affect international conventions to which one or more Member States are parties at the time this Regulation is adopted.
Uporaba določb prava, ki se uporablja, kakor to določa ta uredba, ne bi smela omejevati prostega pretoka blaga in storitev, kakor je to urejeno z instrumenti Skupnosti, kot na primer Direktiva 2000/31/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2000 o nekaterih pravnih vidikih storitev informacijske družbe, zlasti elektronskega poslovanja na notranjem trgu („Direktiva o elektronskem poslovanju“) [6].(36) Zaradi spoštovanja mednarodnih obveznosti, ki so jih prevzele države članice, ta uredba ne sme vplivati na mednarodne konvencije, katerih pogodbenice so ena ali več držav članic v času, ko se sprejme ta uredba.
To make the rules more accessible, the Commission should publish the list of the relevant conventions in the Official Journal of the European Union on the basis of information supplied by the Member States.
Komisija bi morala za zagotovitev lažje dostopnosti veljavnih pravil na podlagi informacij, ki jih predložijo države članice, objaviti seznam zadevnih konvencij v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The Commission will make a proposal to the European Parliament and the Council concerning the procedures and conditions according to which Member States would be entitled to negotiate and conclude on their own behalf agreements with third countries in individual and exceptional cases, concerning sectoral matters, containing provisions on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations.
Komisija bo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predložila predlog v zvezi s postopki in pogoji, v skladu s katerimi bi se lahko države članice v svojem imenu v posameznih in izjemnih primerih v zvezi s sektorskimi zadevami pogajale in sklenile sporazume s tretjimi državami, ki bi vsebovali določbe o pravu, ki se uporablja za nepogodbene obveznosti.
Since the objective of this Regulation cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, and can therefore, by reason of the scale and effects of this Regulation, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Ker države članice ne morejo v zadostni meri doseči cilja te uredbe, ampak ga je mogoče zaradi obsega in učinkov te uredbe bolje doseči na ravni Skupnosti, lahko Skupnost sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti, kakor je navedeno v členu 5 Pogodbe.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary to attain that objective.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz istega člena, ta uredba ne prekoračuje tistega, kar je potrebno za dosego navedenega cilja.