natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In view of the above considerations, the Commission concludes that, since these conditions did not have an onerous character and this was obvious for all potential buyers from the formulation of the tender documents, they did not lower the sale price and did not have the potential to deter potential investors from submitting a bid, and therefore did not involve the loss of state resources for the State.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega je Komisija ugotovila, da ker ti pogoji niso bili težavni, kar je bilo vsem potencialnim kupcem jasno iz formulacije razpisne dokumentacije, niso znižali prodajne cene in niso mogli odvrniti potencialnih vlagateljev od oddaje ponudbe in zato niso vključevali izgube državnih virov za državo.
This conclusion is also supported by the fact that none of the four bidders participating in the tender were even remotely involved in tractor manufacturing.
Tako sklepno ugotovitev podpira tudi dejstvo, da noben od štirih ponudnikov, ki so se udeležili razpisa, ni bil niti najmanj vključen v proizvodnjo traktorjev.
Thus, the Commission considers that the conditions attached did not entail State aid.
Zato Komisija meni, da pogoji, vezani na prodajo, niso pomenili državne pomoči.
Block sale
Prodaja v paketu
When initiating the procedure under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty, the Commission expressed doubts that the voluntary liquidation involving the sale of the viable modules would be the most advantageous outcome for the State as shareholder and the creditors as opposed to judicial liquidation or a piece by piece sale.
Ko je Komisija sprožila postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES, je izrazila dvom, ali je prostovoljna likvidacija, ki vključuje prodajo rentabilnih modulov, najugodnejši izid za državo kot delničarko in upnike v primerjavi s sodno likvidacijo ali prodajo po delih.
Romania argues that AVAS acted like a market economy operator and obtained the highest possible price for Tractorul.
Romunija trdi, da je agencija AVAS ravnala kot udeleženka v tržnem gospodarstvu in za Tractorul dosegla najvišjo mogočo ceno.
To this end, AVAS appointed an independent liquidator by means of an open, transparent, non-discriminatory and unconditional tender, who would carry out the voluntary liquidation.
V ta namen je agencija AVAS na podlagi odprtega, preglednega, nediskriminacijskega in brezpogojnega razpisa imenovala neodvisnega likvidacijskega upravitelja, ki naj bi vodil prostovoljno likvidacijo.
On the basis of the information provided by Romania, the Commission notes that, initially, AVAS intended to sell separately the two viable modules — the tractor plant and the cast-iron forge and foundry.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je zagotovila Romunija, Komisija ugotavlja, da je agencija AVAS sprva nameravala prodati oba rentabilna modula ločeno – tovarno traktorjev ter obrat za proizvodnjo kovanega železa in livarno.
However, based on its own evaluation of the 37 individual assets, CIT, the liquidator recommended the sale of the industrial platform as a whole in order to maximise the proceeds, and only in the event that no potential buyer expressed interest in acquiring the area as a whole would it proceed to a piece by piece sale of the company’s assets.
Likvidacijski upravitelj CIT je na podlagi svoje ocene 37 posamičnih vrst premoženja priporočil prodajo industrijskega kompleksa kot celote, da se čim bolj poveča izkupiček, in samo če noben potencialni kupec ne bi izrazil zanimanja za nakup kompleksa kot celote, bi se prodaja premoženja podjetja nadaljevala po delih.
The liquidator substantiated the advantages of such a comprehensive sale.
Likvidacijski upravitelj je utemeljil prednosti take celovite prodaje.
First, the maps provided by the Romanian authorities show that several land plots are situated at the back of the industrial platform, near the city waste dump, and are not connected to any road, so that in fact they are not individually accessible.
Prvič, karte, ki so jih zagotovili romunski organi, kažejo, da je več parcel za industrijskim kompleksom blizu mestnega odlagališča odpadkov in niso povezane z nobeno cesto, tako da v bistvu niso posamično dostopne.
Second, the value of the individual assets of the industrial platform varied significantly depending on their individual location, the state of the buildings and the existence of access to local infrastructure.
Drugič, vrednost posamičnih vrst premoženja industrijskega kompleksa je bila zelo različna, odvisno od posamezne lokacije, stanja zgradb in možnosti odstopa do lokalne infrastrukture.
Third, the majority of potential investors were interested in the area for real estate development; out of 26 tender documents acquired in total, 17 were bought for the entire Tractorul platform.
Tretjič, večina potencialnih vlagateljev se je zanimala območje za razvoj nepremičnin; od skupno 26 prispelih ponudb jih je bilo 17 za nakup celotnega kompleksa Tractorula.
Consequently, the liquidator considered that it was most likely that the less attractive assets could not be sold on an individual basis to a potential investor.
Zato je bilo po mnenju likvidacijskega upravitelja zelo verjetno, da manj zanimivih delov premoženja potencialnemu vlagatelju ne bo mogoče prodati posamično.
As a result, such assets would generate additional administration and maintenance costs for Tractorul and ultimately for AVAS as the owner.
Zato bi tako premoženje povzročilo dodatne upravne in vzdrževalne stroške za Tractorul in navsezadnje za agencijo AVAS kot lastnico.
Also, the parcelling of the land would generate substantial administrative costs, e.g. expenses for cadastral measurement and land registration.
Tudi razdelitev zemljišča bi povzročila precejšnje upravne stroške, npr. izdatke za katastrsko izmero in vpis v zemljiško knjigo.
The strategy of selling Tractorul as a whole was also subsequently approved by AVAS.
Strategijo prodaje Tractorula kot celote je pozneje odobrila tudi agencija AVAS.
As regards the price obtained, the Commission notes that according to the evaluation report commissioned by the liquidator, the asset value of Tractorul (i.e. the sum of the value of the 37 individual assets) was around EUR 100 million, on which the liquidator applied a 23 % discount for bundled assets, thereby giving a starting sale price of EUR 77 million. Such a discount is based on the liquidator’s experience and on the fact that a block sale bears significant advantages as opposed to a piece by piece sale.
Glede dosežene cene Komisija ugotavlja, da je v skladu z ocenjevalnim poročilom, ki ga je naročil likvidacijski upravitelj, znašala vrednost premoženja Tractorula (tj. vsota vrednosti 37 posamičnih vrst premoženja) približno 100 milijonov EUR, ki jo je likvidacijski upravitelj znižal za 23 % za prodajo v paketu, kar je dalo izklicno ceno 77 milijonov EUR. Tak popust je bil utemeljen na izkušnjah likvidacijskega upravitelja in na dejstvu, da prodaja v paketu zagotavlja precejšnje ugodnosti v primerjavi s prodajo po delih.
The procedure chosen by the liquidator for the sale of Tractorul was the method of competitive tender.
Postopek, ki ga je izbral likvidacijski upravitelj za prodajo Tractorula, je bil postopek konkurenčnega javnega razpisa.
According to the procedural rules established in Government Decision No 577/2002, if at a certain stage there are at least two bidders, and no one bids higher at that stage (which was predetermined before the bid at 5 %), the bidder with the lowest registration number wins the tender [14].
V skladu s postopkovnimi pravili iz sklepa vlade št. 577/2002 velja, da če sta v določeni fazi najmanj dva ponudnika in v tej fazi nihče ne ponudi več (kar je bilo vnaprej določeno pred oddajo ponudb na 5 %), se izbere ponudnik z najnižjo registrsko številko [14].
Since Flavus and a second investor accepted the starting price, but none of them was willing to overbid, Tractorul was sold for EUR 77 million to the bidder with the lowest registration number, i.e. Flavus.
Ker sta Flavus in drugi vlagatelj sprejela izklicno ceno, nobeden od njiju pa ni bil pripravljen ponuditi več, je bil Tractorul prodan za 77 milijonov EUR ponudniku z najnižjo registrsko številko, tj. Flavusu.
Consequently, the liquidator obtained the market price for the company’s assets and did not therefore forego state resources.
Tako je likvidacijski upravitelj dosegel tržno ceno za premoženje podjetja in se ni odrekel državnim virom.
In view of the above, the Commission concludes that, given the particularities of this case, by selling the assets of Tractorul as a whole, AVAS obtained the market price for them, did not therefore forego state resources, and behaved like a market economy operator.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno in ob upoštevanju podrobnosti te zadeve Komisija ugotavlja, da je agencija AVAS s prodajo premoženja Tractorula kot celote zanj dosegla tržno vrednost, se torej ni odrekla državnim virom in je ravnala kot udeleženka v tržnem gospodarstvu.
Classification as State aid: conclusion
Opredelitev kot državna pomoč: sklepna ugotovitev
Based on the above assessment, no conditions were attached to the sale of Tractorul which were liable to lower the sale price or deter potential investors from submitting a bid.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedene ocene se ugotovi, da na prodajo Tractorula niso bili vezani pogoji, ki bi lahko znižali prodajno ceno ali odvrnili potencialne vlagatelje od oddaje ponudbe.
By selling all the assets as a whole under the voluntary liquidation procedure, AVAS obtained the highest price on the market, did not forego state resources and acted like a market economy operator.
S prodajo celotnega premoženja kot celote po postopku prostovoljne likvidacije je agencija AVAS dosegla najvišjo ceno na trgu, se ni odrekla državnim virom in je ravnala kot udeleženka v tržnem gospodarstvu.
Consequently, the sale of Tractorul does not involve State aid.
Zato prodaja Tractorula ne vključuje državne pomoči.
The Commission finds that the sale of Tractorul by the Romanian privatisation Agency, AVAS, on 6 July 2007 does not constitute aid,
Komisija ugotavlja, da prodaja Tractorula, ki jo je izvedla romunska agencija za privatizacijo AVAS 6. julija 2007, ne pomeni pomoči –
The sale by Romania to Flavus Investiții SRL of the Tractorul industrial platform does not involve aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty.
Prodaja industrijskega kompleksa Tractorul Romunije podjetju Flavus Investiții SRL ne vključuje pomoči v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe.
OJ C 249, 24.10.2007, p. 21.
UL C 249, 24.10.2007, str. 21.
The Commission used in its opening decision the expression ‘viable activity’.
Komisija je v svoji odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka uporabila izraz „rentabilna dejavnost“.
However, this wording was contested by Romania, with the argument that the assets of Tractorul are not in a state which would allow the performance of an activity which is economically self-sustainable.
Tej formulaciji je nasprotovala Romunija z argumentom, da sredstva podjetja Tractorul ne omogočajo opravljanja dejavnosti, ki bi bila ekonomsko samozadostna.
Romania proposed the term ‘functional asset’.
Predlagala je izraz „funkcionalno premoženje“.
See, for example, Case T-296/97 Rec, Alitalia, Cases T-228/99 and T-233/99, WestLB v Commission; Case T-366/00, Scott SA, Cases C-328/99 and C-399/00, Italy and SIM 2 Multimedia v Commission; Case T-358/94, Air France v Commission.
Glej na primer zadevo T-296/97 Recueil, Alitalia, zadevi T-228/99 in T-233/99, WestLB proti Komisiji; zadevo T-366/00, Scott SA, zadevi C-328/99 in C-399/00, Italija in SIM 2 Multimedia proti Komisiji; zadevo T-358/94, Air France proti Komisiji.
XXIIIrd Report on Competition Policy, 1993, p. 255.
Glej XXIII. poročilo o konkurenčni politiki, 1993, str. 255.
Points 402 et seq. of XXIIIrd Report on Competition Policy (1993).
Točke 402 in naslednje XXIII. poročila o konkurenčni politiki (1993).
See also point 248 of XXIst Report on Competition Policy (1991): ‘No aid is involved where shareholdings are sold to the highest bidder as a result of an open and unconditional bidding procedure.
Glej tudi točko 248 XXI. poročila o konkurenčni politiki (1991): „Pomoč ni vključena, če se delnice prodajo najboljšemu ponudniku na podlagi odprtega in brezpogojnega javnega razpisa.
If shareholdings are sold under other conditions, aid elements may be present’.
Če se delnice prodajo pod drugimi pogoji, so lahko prisotni elementi pomoči.“
See for example Commission Decision of 3 May 2000, TASQ, OJ L 272, 25.10.2000, where the Commission found that ‘The French authorities also showed that the invitation to tender was transparent and unconditional […].
Glej na primer Odločbo Komisije z dne 3. maja 2000, TASQ, UL L 272 z dne 25.10.2000, v kateri je Komisija ugotovila, da „so tudi francoski organi dokazali, da je bil javni razpis pregleden in brezpogojen […].
See, for example, Cases T-228/99 and T-233/99, WestLB v Commission; Case T-366/00, Scott SA, Cases C-328/99 and C-399/00, Italy and SIM 2 Multimedia v Commission; Case T-358/94, Air France v Commission; Case T-296/97 Rec, Alitalia.
Glej na primer zadevi T-228/99 in T-233/99, WestLB proti Komisiji; zadevo T-366/00, Scott SA, zadevi C-328/99 in C-399/00, Italija in SIM 2 Multimedia proti Komisiji; zadevo T-358/94, Air France proti Komisiji;. zadevo T-296/97 Recueil, Alitalia.
See XXIIIrd Report on Competition Policy, 1993, p. 255.
Glej XXIII. poročilo o konkurenčni politiki, 1993, str. 255.
In Commission Decision of 15 February 2000, Dessauer Geräteindustrie (OJ L 1, 4.1.2001, p. 10), the absence of conditions, i.e. the unconditional nature of a tender led the Commission to conclude that no aid was involved in the privatisation procedure.
V Odločbi Komisije z dne 15. februarja 2000, Dessauer Geräteindustrie (UL L 1, 4.1.2001, str. 10) je zaradi odsotnosti pogojev, tj. brezpogojnega značaja javnega razpisa, Komisija ugotovila, da v postopku privatizacije ni bila vključena pomoč.
See Commission Decision of 27 February 2008, Privatisation of Automobile Craiova, Romania, not yet published.
Glej Odločbo Komisije z dne 27. februarja 2008, Privatizacija podjetja Automobile Craiova, Romunija, ki še ni bila objavljena.
Such an analysis was, for example, carried out in Commission Decision of 20 June 2001, Sale of shares in GSG — Land Berlin, OJ C 67, 16.3.2002, p. 33, and allowed the Commission to conclude that no aid was involved even given the unusual conditions, because it found that the conditions were not liable to reduce the sale price.
Taka analiza je bila na primer opravljena v Odločbi Komisije z dne 20.6.2001Prodaja delnic v GSG – Land Berlin, UL C 67, 16.3.2002, str. 33, ki je Komisiji omogočila ugotovitev, da kljub neobičajnim pogojem ni bila vključena pomoč, ker je ugotovila, da za pogoje ni bilo verjetno, da bi znižali prodajno ceno.
The registration number corresponds to the order in which the tender documentation was submitted.
Registrska številka ustreza vrstnemu redu, po katerem je bila predložena ponudbena dokumentacija.
In particular, the documents submitted to the Commission showed that the sale of TASQ was not conditional on, for example, job maintenance, locations or continuation of activity’.
Dokumenti, predloženi Komisiji, zlasti kažejo, da prodaja TASQ ni bila pogojena na primer z ohranitvijo delovnih mest ali nadaljevanjem dejavnosti“.
This allowed the Commission to conclude that no aid was present in the privatisation.
To je Komisiji omogočilo ugotovitev, da pri privatizaciji ni bila prisotna pomoč.
Decision No 768/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Sklep št. 768/2008/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on a common framework for the marketing of products, and repealing Council Decision 93/465/EEC
o skupnem okviru za trženje proizvodov in razveljavitvi Sklepa Sveta 93/465/EGS
On 7 May 2003 the Commission issued a Communication to the Council and the European Parliament entitled ‘Enhancing the Implementation of the New Approach Directives’.
Dne 7. maja 2003 je Komisija izdala Sporočilo Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z naslovom Okrepitev izvajanja direktiv novega pristopa.
In its Resolution of 10 November 2003, the Council acknowledged the importance of the New Approach as an appropriate and efficient regulatory model allowing technological innovation and enhancing the competitiveness of European industry, and confirmed the necessity of extending the application of its principles to new areas, while recognising the need for a clearer framework for conformity assessment, accreditation and market surveillance.
Svet je v Resoluciji z dne 10. novembra 2003 potrdil pomen novega pristopa kot primernega in učinkovitega regulativnega modela, ki omogoča tehnološke inovacije in krepi konkurenčnost evropske industrije, ter potrdil nujnost razširitve uporabe njegovih načel na nova področja in hkrati priznal potrebo po jasnejšem okviru za ugotavljanje skladnosti, akreditacijo in nadzor trga.
This Decision lays down common principles and reference provisions intended to apply across sectoral legislation in order to provide a coherent basis for revision or recasts of that legislation.
Ta sklep določa skupna načela in referenčne določbe za uporabo v sektorski zakonodaji z namenom zagotavljati skladno podlago za revizijo ali preoblikovanje navedene zakonodaje.
This Decision therefore constitutes a general framework of a horizontal nature for future legislation harmonising the conditions for the marketing of products and a reference text for existing legislation.
Ta sklep določa splošni horizontalni okvir za prihodnjo zakonodajo, ki usklajuje pogoje za trženje proizvodov in referenčno besedilo za obstoječo zakonodajo.
This Decision provides, in the form of reference provisions, definitions and general obligations for economic operators and a range of conformity assessment procedures from which the legislator can select as appropriate.
Ta sklep določa v obliki referenčnih določb opredelitev in splošne obveznosti za gospodarske subjekte ter vrsto postopkov za ugotavljanje skladnosti, med katerimi lahko zakonodajalec izbira.
It also lays down rules for CE marking.
Hkrati določa pravila za CE-označevanje.
Furthermore, reference provisions are provided as regards the requirements for conformity assessment bodies to be notified to the Commission as competent to carry out the relevant conformity assessment procedures and as regards the notification procedures.
Referenčne določbe določajo zahteve glede organov za ugotavljanje skladnosti, ki jih je treba priglasiti Komisiji kot primerne za izvedbo ustreznih postopkov ugotavljanja skladnosti in priglasitvenih postopkov.
In addition, this Decision includes reference provisions concerning procedures for dealing with products presenting a risk in order to ensure the safety of the market place.
Ta sklep vsebuje tudi referenčne določbe o postopkih, ki so povezani s tveganimi proizvodi z namenom zagotavljanja varnosti na trgu.
Whenever legislation is drawn up which concerns a product already subject to other Community acts, those acts must be taken into account to ensure the consistency of all legislation concerning the same product.
Kadar koli se pripravlja zakonodaja za proizvod, za katerega že veljajo drugi akti Skupnosti, se ti akti upoštevajo, da se zagotovi usklajenost celotne zakonodaje, ki zadeva enak proizvod.
However, the specificities of sectoral needs may provide grounds for recourse to other regulatory solutions.
Kljub temu pa posebne sektorske potrebe lahko upravičeno vodijo do drugih ureditvenih rešitev.
In particular, that is the case where there are specific, comprehensive legal systems already in place in a sector, as for example in the fields of feed and food, cosmetic and tobacco products, common market organisations for agricultural products, plant health and plant protection, human blood and tissues, medicinal products for human and veterinary use and chemicals, or where sectoral needs require specific adaptation of the common principles and reference provisions, as for example in the fields of medical devices, construction products and marine equipment.
To velja zlasti v primeru, ko že obstajajo specifični, celoviti pravni sistemi na določenem področju, na primer na področju krme in živil, kozmetike in tobačnih izdelkov, skupnih tržnih ureditev za kmetijske izdelke, zdravja rastlin ali zaščite rastlin, človeške krvi in tkiv, medicinskih proizvodov za humano in veterinarsko uporabo in kemikalij, ali če sektorske potrebe zahtevajo posebno prilagoditev skupnih načel in referenčnih določb, kot na primer na področju medicinskih naprav, gradbenih proizvodov in pomorske opreme.
Such adaptations may also be related to the modules set out in Annex II.
Takšne prilagoditve se lahko nanašajo tudi na module iz Priloge II.
Whenever legislation is drawn up, the legislator may depart, totally or partially, from the common principles and reference provisions laid down in this Decision on account of the specificities of the sector concerned.
Kadar koli se pripravlja zakonodaja se lahko zakonodajalec oddalji, v celoti ali delno, od skupnih načel in referenčnih določb tega sklepa zaradi posebnih značilnosti zadevnih sektorjev.
Any such departure should be justified.
Tako odstopanje mora biti upravičeno.
Although the incorporation of the provisions of this Decision in future legislative acts cannot be required by law, the co-legislators adopting this Decision have entered into a clear political commitment which they should respect in any legislative act falling within the scope of this Decision.
Čeprav se vključitev določb iz tega sklepa v prihodnje zakonodajne akte ne more predpisati z zakonodajo, sta se sozakonodajalca s sprejetjem tega sklepa obvezala k jasni politični zavezi, ki jih morata spoštovati v vsakem zakonodajnem aktu, ki sodi v okvir tega sklepa.
Specific product legislation should, wherever possible, avoid going into technical detail but should limit itself to the expression of essential requirements.
Posebna zakonodaja o proizvodih naj bi se, kadar je to mogoče, izogibala tehničnim podrobnostim in se omejila na izražanje bistvenih zahtev.
Such legislation should, where appropriate, have recourse to harmonised standards adopted in accordance with Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services for the purpose of expressing detailed technical specifications.
Taka zakonodaja naj bi, kadar je to primerno, uporabljala harmonizirane standarde, sprejete v skladu z Direktivo 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. junija 1998 o določitvi postopka za zbiranje informacij na področju tehničnih standardov in tehničnih predpisov ter pravil o storitvah informacijske družbe za namene izražanja natančnih tehničnih določil.
This Decision builds on and complements the standardisation system provided for by that Directive.
Ta sklep nadgrajuje in dopolnjuje standardizacijski sistem, določen z navedeno direktivo.
However, where health and safety, the protection of consumers or of the environment, other aspects of public interest, or clarity and practicability so require, detailed technical specifications may be set out in the legislation concerned.
Če je iz vidika zdravja in varnosti, varstva potrošnikov ali okolja, drugih vidikov zaščite javnega interesa, jasnosti in praktičnosti to potrebno, se lahko natančne tehnične specifikacije določijo v zadevni zakonodaji.
The presumption of conformity to a legal provision conferred by conformity to a harmonised standard should enhance recourse to compliance with harmonised standards.
Domneva o skladnosti z zakonsko določbo, skladno preneseno na harmonizirani standard, bi morala povečati ravnanje, ki je skladno s harmoniziranimi standardi.
It should be possible for Member States or the Commission to object in cases in which a harmonised standard does not entirely satisfy the requirements of Community harmonisation legislation.
Države članice in Komisija bi morale imeti možnost ugovora v primerih, ko harmonizirani standard ne izpolnjuje v celoti zahtev usklajevalne zakonodaje Skupnosti.
The Commission should be able to decide not to publish such a standard.
Komisija bi moral imeti možnost odločiti, da takega standarda ne bo objavila.