natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
By July 2005, Hynix was a much healthier company, although a highly indebted one.
Do julija 2005 je šlo družbi že bolje, čeprav je bila še vedno zelo zadolžena.
It had returned to profitability and its credit rating was BBB+.
Postala je dobičkonosna, njena bonitetna ocena pa je bila BBB+.
Evidence on the record show that the terms of the financing provided by the Korean banks were not inconsistent with its credit rating.
Zabeleženi dokazi kažejo, da financiranje korejskih bank ni bilo protislovno z bonitetno oceno družbe.
Further, the degree of participation of foreign banks supports Hynix's claim that the refinancing was made on commercial terms.
Poleg tega obseg udeležbe tujih bank podpira Hynixovo trditev, da je bilo refinanciranje v skladu s komercialnimi pogoji.
In addition, there was no evidence of entrustment or direction of the Korean banks in relation to the loans extended to Hynix pursuant to this refinancing.
Poleg tega v zvezi s podaljšanjem posojila Hynixu v skladu z njegovim financiranjem ni bilo dokazov, da bi korejske banke prejele pooblastila ali navodila.
Therefore, the July 2005 refinancing is not considered to be a subsidy within Article 2 of the basic Regulation.
Zato se refinanciranje julija 2005 ne šteje kot subvencioniranje v smislu člena 2 osnovne uredbe.
Conclusion on measures
Sklepne ugotovitve o ukrepih
The benefit from the subsidies countervailed in the original investigation was deemed to have been received on 1 January 2001 and was allocated over a period of five years, which corresponded to the normal depreciation period of the assets in the semiconductor industry.
Ugodnosti subvencij v prvotni preiskavi, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalne dajatve, naj bi bile prejete 1. januarja 2001 in so bile razporejene na obdobje petih let, kar je ustrezalo običajni amortizacijski dobi v industriji polprevodnikov.
The measures imposed in the original investigation related to one-off, non-recurring subsidies, allocated over a set period of time and as such allocation period is deemed to begin at the time the benefit was actually received, it is considered that the measures imposed by the definitive duty Regulation expired on 1 January 2006.
Ukrepi, uvedeni v prvotni uredbi, so se nanašali na enkratno, neponavljajočo se subvencijo, razdeljeno na obdobje pet let, in ker se izhaja iz tega, da se je to obdobje začelo z dnem, ko je bila ugodnost dejansko odobrena, se šteje, da so ukrepi, ki so bili uvedeni z dokončno uredbo dne 1. januarja 2006, prenehali veljati.
As the debt rollover and the principalised interest of December 2002 ceased to confer a benefit on Hynix on 13 July 2005 and as the debt-to-equity swap of December 2002 expired on 31 December 2007, the measures should be repealed with effect from 31 December 2007 and the proceeding terminated.
Ker Hynix dne 13. julija 2005 ni več užival ugodnosti od prenosa dolga in pretvorbe obresti v glavnico iz decembra 2002 in ker je zamenjava dolga v lastniške deleže iz decembra 2002 prenehala veljati 31. decembra 2007, je treba ukrepe razveljaviti z veljavnostjo od 31. decembra 2007, postopek pa zaključiti.
Consequently, the definitive countervailing duties paid or entered in the accounts pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1480/2003 on imports of certain electronic integrated circuits known as Dynamic Random Access Memories (DRAMs) manufactured using variations of metal oxide-semiconductors (MOS) process technology, including complementary MOS types (CMOS), of all types, densities, variations, access speed, configuration, package or frame etc., originating in the Republic of Korea and released for free circulation as from 31 December 2007 should be repaid or remitted.
Posledično je treba dokončne izravnalne dajatve, ki so bile plačane ali vknjižene v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1480/2003 na uvoz nekaterih elektronskih mikrovezij, poznanih kot DRAM, proizvedenih z uporabo različic procesne tehnologije kovinskooksidnih polprevodnikov (MOS), vključno z dopolnilnimi vrstami MOS (CMOS), vseh vrst, gostot, različic, ne glede na hitrost dostopa, konfiguracijo, paket ali okvir itd., s poreklom iz Republike Koreje in sproščenih v prosti promet, od 31. decembra 2007 povrniti ali opustiti.
Hynix, the GOK, the Community industry and all other interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it is intended to recommend the repeal of the measures in force and the termination of the proceeding and had the opportunity to comment.
Hynix, vlada republike Koreje in industrija Skupnosti ter vse druge zainteresirane strani so bili obveščeni o pomembnih dejstvih in ugotovitvah, na podlagi česar se priporoča razveljavitev veljavnih ukrepov ter zaključek postopka, in jim je bila dana možnost izraziti svoje stališče.
Where appropriate, such comments were addressed in the sections of this Regulation specifically dealing with the issues raised.
Takšna stališča je treba po potrebi obravnavati v delih te uredbe, zlasti tistih, ki obravnavajo navedeno vprašanje.
Repayment or remission must be requested from national customs authorities in accordance with applicable customs legislation.
Povrnitev ali opustitev dajatev je treba zahtevati pri nacionalnih carinskih organih v skladu z veljavno carinsko zakonodajo.
In its comments, the Community industry also claimed that measures should remain in force until they expire in August 2008, five years after the imposition of the definitive measures in order to offset countervailable subsidisation and cite Article 19 of the basic Regulation in support of such claim.
Industrija Skupnosti je v svojih pripombah trdila, da bi morali ukrepi ostati veljavni do avgusta 2008, pet let po uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov, da se izravnajo sporne subvencije, in se ob tem sklicevala na člen 19 osnovne uredbe.
However, Article 19 provides, inter alia, the possibility to repeal measures if they are no longer necessary to countervail subsidisation.
Člen 19 med drugim predvideva možnost razveljavitve ukrepov, če niso več potrebni za izravnavo subvencij.
Furthermore, Article 15 of the basic Regulation, which provides the basis for the imposition of measures, states that measures can be imposed — and by analogy, maintained — ‘unless the subsidy or subsidies are withdrawn or it has been demonstrated that the subsidies no longer confer any benefit on the exporters involved.’
Poleg tega člen 15 osnovne uredbe, ki zagotavlja podlago za uvedbo ukrepov, navaja, da se ukrepi lahko uvedejo in se lahko tudi ohranijo, „razen, če se odpravijo subvencije, ali se dokaže, da se zadevnim izvoznikom ne zagotavljajo ugodnosti“.
As the result of the investigation indicates that the subsidies given to Hynix have ceased to confer a benefit, the measures cannot be kept in force and the claim of the Community industry has to be rejected,
Ker je preiskava pokazala, da subvencije, ki jih je prejemal Hynix, ne zagotavljajo več ugodnosti, ukrepi pa se ne morejo več izvajati, mora biti trditev Skupnosti zavrnjena –
The countervailing duty imposed on imports of certain electronic integrated circuits known as Dynamic Random Access Memories (DRAMs) manufactured using variations of metal oxide-semiconductors (MOS) process technology, including complementary MOS types (CMOS), of all types, densities, variations, access speed, configuration, package or frame etc. originating in the Republic of Korea imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1480/2003 is repealed as of 31 December 2007 and the proceeding is terminated.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1480/2003 se z 31. decembrom 2007 razveljavi izravnalna dajatev, uvedena na uvoz nekaterih elektronskih integriranih vezij, znanih kot DRAM, proizvedenih z uporabo različic procesne tehnologije kovinskooksidnih polprevodnikov (MOS), vključno z dopolnilnimi vrstami MOS (CMOS), vseh vrst, gostot, različic, ne glede na hitrost dostopa, konfiguracijo, paket ali okvir itd., s poreklom iz Republike Koreje, postopek pa se zaključi.
The definitive countervailing duties paid or entered into account pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1480/2003 as from 31 December 2007 shall be repaid or remitted, pursuant to Article 236 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code [10].
Dokončne izravnalne dajatve, ki so bile od 31. decembra 2007 v skladu s členom 1 Uredbe (ES) št. 1480/2003 plačane ali vknjižene, se v skladu s členom 236 Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 z dne 12. oktobra 1992 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [10] povrnejo ali odpustijo.
WT/DS299/R European Communities — Countervailing Measures on Dynamic Random Access Memory Chips from Korea, adopted on 3 August 2005.
WT/DS299/R Evropski skupnosti – izravnalni ukrepi za čipe za dinamične bralno-pisalne pomnilnike iz Koreje, sprejeto 3. avgusta 2005.
OJ L 103, 12.4.2006, p. 1.
UL L 103, 12.4.2006, str. 1.
OJ C 67, 18.3.2006, p. 16.
UL C 67, 18.3.2006, str. 16.
Kangwon Lee, CEO of KEB ‘I will not tell’, Maeil Business Newspaper, 23 August 2002.
Kangwon Lee, izvršni direktor KEB: „I will not tell“, Maeil Business Newspaper, 23. avgusta 2002.
EC-Korea DRAMs Panel Report, Para 7.212.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora ES-Koreja o DRAM, odstavek 7.212.
Japan-Korea DRAMs WT/DS336/R Panel Report Para 7.283-7.298.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora Japonska-Koreja o DRAM WT/DS336/R, odstavki 7.283 – 7.298.
We are cutting 02-03 estimates into deficit territory as cost improvements and supply growth is constrained by lack of investment in the process technology upgrade’. Another one of Hynix's advisors, Deutsche Bank Korea, admitted that their equities department, although it followed the semiconductor industry, did not follow Hynix, as ‘there was a lack of investor appetite’.
Znižujemo ocene za 2002–2003 glede primanjkljaja, ker pomanjkanje naložb v nadgrajevanje procesne tehnologije ovira stroškovne izboljšave in rast proizvodnje.“ Drug svetovalec družbe Hynix, in sicer Deutsche Bank Korea, je priznal, da je njihov oddelek za lastniški kapital sicer spremljal razvoj industrije polprevodnikov, ni pa spremljal razvoja družbe Hynix zaradi „pomanjkanja zanimanja vlagateljev“.
These confidential documents show that, although the creditors each went through their standard internal procedures in deciding to participate in the restructuring, they did not act in accordance with the credit rating they had each ascribed to Hynix for the period in question. Although all creditors had given Hynix a rating equivalent to Standard & Poor's Selective Default, they nevertheless proceeded to approve the restructuring plan.
Ti zaupni dokumenti kažejo, da čeprav so vsi upniki pri odločanju o udeležbi pri prestrukturiranju izvedli svoje standardne postopke, niso delovali v skladu z bonitetno oceno, ki so jo Hynixu pripisali v zadevnem obdobju, čeprav so vsi upniki Hynix ocenili v skladu z oceno družbe Standard & Poor kot družbo, ki plačuje le nekatere obveznosti.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 321/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 321/2008
This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 April 2008.
Ta uredba začne veljati 9. aprila 2008.
to Commission Regulation of 8 April 2008 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 8. aprila 2008 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 322/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 322/2008
of 9 April 2008
z dne 9. aprila 2008
This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 April 2008.
Ta uredba začne veljati 10. aprila 2008.
Done at Brussels, 9 April 2008.
V Bruslju, 9. aprila 2008
to Commission Regulation of 9 April 2008 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 9. aprila 2008 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 323/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 323/2008
It is appropriate to provide that binding tariff information which has been issued by the customs authorities of Member States in respect of the classification of goods in the Combined Nomenclature but which is not in accordance with this Regulation can, for a period of three months, continue to be invoked by the holder, under Article 12(6) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code [2].
Primerno je zagotoviti, da se po določbah iz člena 12(6) Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 z dne 12. oktobra 1992, o Carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [2] imetnik lahko za obdobje treh mesecev še naprej sklicuje na zavezujoče tarifne informacije, ki jih izdajo carinski organi držav članic v zvezi z uvrstitvijo blaga v kombinirano nomenklaturo in ki niso v skladu z določbami te uredbe.
Spectacle-shaped supple plastic article containing a coloured liquid solution with the following composition (% by volume):
Prožen izdelek iz plastične mase v obliki očal, ki vsebuje obarvano raztopino, z naslednjo sestavo (v vol. %):
propylene glycol 60
propilenglikol 60
This product is designed to relieve headaches when applied to the face having first been cooled in a refrigerator.
Ta izdelek je namenjen odpravljanju glavobola; pred uporabo na obrazu ga je treba ohladiti v hladilniku.
Classification is determined by General Rules 1, 3(b) and 6 for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature and by the wording of CN codes 3824, 382490 and 38249097.
Uvrstitev opredeljujejo splošna pravila 1, 3(b) in 6 za razlago kombinirane nomenklature ter besedilo oznak KN 3824, 382490 in 38249097.
The solution contained in the plastic envelope is used as a coolant and gives the product its essential character of a preparation of heading 3824.
Raztopina, ki je v plastičnem ovoju, se uporablja kot hladilno sredstvo in daje proizvodu bistvene značilnosti pripravka pod tarifno številko 3824.
The article does not have a therapeutic or prophylactic effect, within the meaning of Chapter 30.
Izdelek nima terapevtskega ali profilaktičnega učinka v smislu poglavja 30.
Envelope made of plastic sheets containing a mixture of water and oil for inserting in the cups of swimming suits or bras.
Blazinica iz plastične folije, ki vsebuje mešanico vode in olja, za namestitev v košarice kopalk in nedrčkov.
Classification is determined by General Rules 1, 3(b) and 6 for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature and by the wording of CN codes 3926 and 39262000.
Uvrstitev opredeljujejo splošna pravila 1, 3(b) in 6 za razlago kombinirane nomenklature ter besedilo oznak KN 3926 in 39262000.
As the article is designed for inserting in the cups of swimming suits or bras for woman, it is, within the meaning of heading 3926, considered to be a clothing accessory of subheading 39262000.
Ker je izdelek namenjen namestitvi v košarice ženskih kopalk ali nedrčkov, ga je treba v smislu tarifne številke 3926 obravnavati kot oblačilni dodatek pod tarifno podštevilko 39262000.
Fabric tissue article in the form of a belt, containing common wheat grains, that after being heated by microwave, is used to relieve lower back pain.
Izdelek iz tanke tkanine v obliki pasu, ki vsebuje zrna navadne pšenice in se po segretju v mikrovalovni pečici uporablja za blažitev bolečin v križu.
Classification is determined by General Rules 1, 3(b) and 6 for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature and by the wording of CN codes 1001, 100190 and 10019099.
Uvrstitev opredeljujejo splošna pravila 1, 3(b) in 6 za razlago kombinirane nomenklature in besedilo oznak KN 1001, 100190 in 10019099.
The common wheat contained in the belt is used to transfer stored heat and gives the product its essential character of a cereal of heading 1001.
Pšenična zrna v tem pasu so namenjena prenosu shranjene toplote in dajejo izdelku bistvene značilnosti žitaric pod tarifno številko 1001.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 324/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 324/2008
laying down revised procedures for conducting Commission inspections in the field of maritime security
o določitvi revidiranih postopkov za izvajanje inšpekcijskih pregledov Komisije na področju pomorske varnosti
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 725/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on enhancing ship and port facility security [1], and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 725/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o povečanju zaščite na ladjah in v pristaniščih [1], in zlasti člena 9(4) Uredbe,
Having regard to Directive 2005/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on enhancing port security [2], and in particular Article 13(2) and (3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2005/65/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. oktobra 2005 o krepitvi varnosti v pristaniščih [2] ter zlasti člena 13(2) in (3) Direktive,
In order to monitor the application by Member States of Regulation (EC) No 725/2004 the Commission should conduct inspections starting six months after the entry into force of that Regulation.
Komisija bi morala šest mesecev po začetku veljavnosti Uredbe (ES) št. 725/2004 začeti izvajati inšpekcijske preglede, da bi spremljala, kako države članice izvajajo navedeno uredbo.
The organisation of inspections under the supervision of the Commission is necessary to verify the effectiveness of national quality control systems and maritime security measures, procedures and structures.
Organizacija inšpekcijskih pregledov pod nadzorom Komisije je nujna za preverjanje učinkovitosti nacionalnih sistemov nadzora kakovosti ter ukrepov, postopkov in struktur pomorske varnosti.
In accordance with Article 13(3) of Directive 2005/65/EC, the Commission should monitor the implementation by Member States of the said Directive jointly with the inspections provided for in Regulation (EC) No 725/2004.
V skladu s členom 13(3) Direktive 2005/65/ES bi morala Komisija poleg pregledov iz Uredbe (ES) št. 725/2004 spremljati, kako države članice izvajajo navedeno direktivo.
The European Maritime Safety Agency established by Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] should provide the Commission with technical assistance in the performance of the latter’s inspection tasks in respect of ships, relevant companies and Recognised Security Organisations.
Evropska agencija za pomorsko varnost, ustanovljena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1406/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3], mora Komisiji zagotavljati strokovno pomoč pri opravljanju inšpekcijskih nalog glede ladij, ustreznih gospodarskih družb in priznanih varnostnih organizacij.
The Commission should co-ordinate the schedule and preparation of its inspections with the Member States.
Komisija mora uskladiti časovni razpored in priprave svojih inšpekcijskih pregledov z državami članicami.
The Commission’s inspection teams should be able to call upon qualified national inspectors, where available.
V skupine Komisije, ki opravljajo preglede, naj bi bili, če je mogoče, vključeni usposobljeni nacionalni inšpektorji.
Commission inspections should be carried out according to a set procedure, including a standard methodology.
Komisija bi morala inšpekcijske preglede izvajati po določenem postopku, ki vključuje standardno metodologijo.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 884/2005 of 10 June 2005 laying down procedures for conducting Commission inspections in the field of maritime security [4] should therefore be repealed.
Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 884/2005 z dne 10. junija 2005 o določitvi postopkov za izvajanje inšpekcijskih pregledov Komisije na področju pomorske varnosti [4] je zato treba razveljaviti.
This Regulation lays down procedures for conducting Commission inspections to monitor the application of Regulation (EC) No 725/2004 at the level of each Member State and of individual port facilities and relevant companies.
Ta uredba določa postopke za izvajanje inšpekcijskih pregledov Komisije, namenjene spremljanju, kako države članice izvajajo Uredbo (ES) št. 725/2004 na ravni posamezne države članice, pristaniške infrastrukture in ustrezne družbe.
This Regulation also lays down procedures for the monitoring by the Commission of the implementation of Directive 2005/65/EC jointly with the inspections at the level of Member States and port facilities in respect of ports as defined in Article 2(11) of this Regulation.
Ta uredba določa tudi postopke, po katerih Komisija spremlja izvajanje Direktive 2005/65/ES, skupaj z inšpekcijskimi pregledi na ravni držav članic in pristaniških infrastruktur v zvezi s pristanišči, kakor so opredeljeni v členu 2(11) te uredbe.
The inspections shall be conducted in a transparent, effective, harmonised and consistent manner.
Inšpekcijski pregledi morajo potekati pregledno, učinkovito, usklajeno in dosledno.
‘Commission inspection’ means an examination by Commission inspectors of Member States' national maritime security quality control systems, measures, procedures and structures, to determine compliance with Regulation (EC) No 725/2004 and implementation of Directive 2005/65/EC;
„inšpekcijski pregled Komisije“ pomeni pregled sistemov, ukrepov, postopkov in struktur držav članic na področju nadzora kakovosti pomorske varnosti, ki ga izvajajo inšpektorji Komisije, da se ugotovi skladnost z Uredbo (ES) št. 725/2004 in izvajanje Direktive 2005/65/ES;
‘Commission inspector’ means a person fulfilling the criteria set out in Article 7 employed by the Commission, or employed by the European Maritime Safety Agency or a national inspector, mandated by the Commission to participate in Commission inspections;
„inšpektor Komisije“ pomeni osebo, ki izpolnjuje merila iz člena 7 in je uslužbenec Komisije ali Evropske agencije za pomorsko varnost, ali nacionalnega inšpektorja, ki ga Komisija pooblasti za udeležbo na inšpekcijskih pregledih;
‘objective evidence’ means quantitative or qualitative information, records or findings pertaining to security or to the existence and implementation of a requirement laid down in Regulation (EC) No 725/2004 or Directive 2005/65/EC, which are based on observation, measurement or test and which can be verified;
„objektivni dokaz“ pomeni kvantitativne ali kvalitativne podatke, zapise ali ugotovitve v zvezi z varnostjo ali obstojem in izvajanjem zahteve iz Uredbe (ES) št. 725/2004 ali Direktive 2005/65/ES, ki temeljijo na opazovanju, merjenju ali preskusu in so preverljivi;
‘observation’ means a finding made during a Commission inspection and substantiated by objective evidence;
„opažanje“ pomeni ugotovitev med inšpekcijskim pregledom Komisije, podprto z objektivnim dokazom;
‘non-conformity’ means an observed situation where objective evidence indicates the non-fulfilment of a requirement laid down in Regulation (EC) No 725/2004 or Directive 2005/65/EC that requires corrective action;
„neskladnost“ pomeni opaženo stanje, pri katerem je objektivno dokazano neizpolnjevanje zahteve iz Uredbe (ES) št. 725/2004 ali Direktive 2005/65/ES, ki zahteva korektivni ukrep;
‘major non-conformity’ means an identifiable deviation that poses a serious threat to maritime security that requires immediate corrective action and includes the lack of effective and systematic implementation of a requirement laid down in Regulation (EC) No 725/2004 or Directive 2005/65/EC;
„večja neskladnost“ pomeni opredeljivo odstopanje, ki resno ogroža pomorsko varnost in zahteva takojšnji korektivni ukrep ter vključuje pomanjkanje učinkovitega in sistematičnega izvajanja zahteve iz Uredbe (ES) št. 725/2004 ali Direktive 2005/65/ES;
‘focal point’ means the body designated by each Member State to serve as a contact point for the Commission and other Member States and to facilitate, follow up and inform on the application of the maritime security measures laid down in Regulation (EC) No 725/2004 and the port security measures laid down in Directive 2005/65/EC;
„kontaktna točka“ pomeni organ, ki ga vsaka država članica imenuje, da deluje kot kontaktna točka za Komisijo in druge države članice ter je pristojen za lažje izvajanje, spremljanje in obveščanje o izvajanju ukrepov na področju pomorske varnosti iz Uredbe (ES) št. 725/2004 in ukrepov za varnost pristanišč iz Direktive 2005/65/ES;