natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Council, by an Act dated 26 May 1997 [3], drew up a Convention on the service in the Member States of the European Union of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters and recommended it for adoption by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional rules.
Svet je z Aktom z dne 26. maja 1997 [3] pripravil Konvencijo o vročanju sodnih in izvensodnih pisanj v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah v državah članicah Evropske unije in priporočil, naj jo države članice sprejmejo v skladu s svojimi ustavnimi pravili.
That Convention has not entered into force.
Navedena konvencija ni začela veljati.
Continuity in the results of the negotiations for conclusion of the Convention should be ensured.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba ohranitev rezultatov, doseženih v okviru pogajanj za sklenitev Konvencije.
On 29 May 2000 the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters [4].
Svet je 29. maja 2000 sprejel Uredbo (ES) št. 1348/2000 o vročanju sodnih in zunajsodnih pisanj v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah v državah članicah [4].
The main content of that Regulation is based on the Convention.
Bistveni del vsebine navedene uredbe temelji na Konvenciji.
On 1 October 2004 the Commission adopted a report on the application of Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000.
Komisija je 1. oktobra 2004 sprejela Poročilo o izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1348/2000.
The report concludes that the application of Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 has generally improved and expedited the transmission and the service of documents between Member States since its entry into force in 2001, but that nevertheless the application of certain provisions is not fully satisfactory.
Zaključek poročila je, da se je pošiljanje in vročanje pisanj med državami članicami od začetka veljavnosti Uredbe (ES) št. 1348/2000 leta 2001 na splošno izboljšalo ter pospešilo, vendar pa izvajanje nekaterih določb navedene uredbe ni v celoti zadovoljivo.
Efficiency and speed in judicial procedures in civil matters require that judicial and extrajudicial documents be transmitted directly and by rapid means between local bodies designated by the Member States.
Zaradi učinkovitosti in hitrosti sodnih postopkov v civilnih zadevah mora pošiljanje sodnih in izvensodnih pisanj potekati neposredno in s hitrimi sredstvi med lokalnimi organi, ki jih imenujejo države članice.
Member States may indicate their intention to designate only one transmitting or receiving agency or one agency to perform both functions, for a period of five years.
Države članice lahko izrazijo svoj namen, da bodo za obdobje petih let imenovale en organ za pošiljanje in en organ za sprejem, ali samo en organ, ki bo opravljal obe nalogi.
This designation may, however, be renewed every five years.
Vendar se to imenovanje lahko obnovi vsakih pet let.
Speed in transmission warrants the use of all appropriate means, provided that certain conditions as to the legibility and reliability of the document received are observed.
Hitrost pošiljanja upravičuje uporabo vseh ustreznih sredstev, če so izpolnjeni določeni pogoji glede čitljivosti in zanesljivosti prejetega pisanja.
Security in transmission requires that the document to be transmitted be accompanied by a standard form, to be completed in the official language or one of the official languages of the place where service is to be effected, or in another language accepted by the Member State in question.
Zaradi varnosti pošiljanja mora biti pisanju, ki se pošilja, priložen standardni obrazec, ki mora biti izpolnjen v uradnem jeziku ali v enem od uradnih jezikov kraja, kjer naj se vročitev opravi, ali v drugem jeziku, ki je za zadevno državo članico sprejemljiv.
This Regulation should not apply to service of a document on the party’s authorised representative in the Member State where the proceedings are taking place regardless of the place of residence of that party.
Ta uredba se ne glede na stalno prebivališče stranke ne bi smela uporabljati za vročitev pisanja pooblaščenemu predstavniku stranke v državi članici, kjer poteka postopek.
The service of a document should be effected as soon as possible, and in any event within one month of receipt by the receiving agency.
Vročitev pisanja bi bilo treba opraviti čim prej, v vsakem primeru pa v enem mesecu po njegovem prejemu s strani organa za sprejem.
To secure the effectiveness of this Regulation, the possibility of refusing service of documents should be confined to exceptional situations.
Za zagotovitev učinkovitosti te uredbe bi bilo treba možnost, da se vročitev pisanja zavrne, omejiti na izjemne primere.
In order to facilitate the transmission and service of documents between Member States, the standard forms set out in the Annexes to this Regulation should be used.
Za lažje pošiljanje in vročanje pisanj med državami članicami bi bilo treba uporabljati standardne obrazce iz prilog k tej uredbi.
The receiving agency should inform the addressee in writing using the standard form that he may refuse to accept the document to be served at the time of service or by returning the document to the receiving agency within one week if it is not either in a language which he understands or in the official language or one of the official languages of the place of service.
Organ za sprejem bi moral z uporabo standardnega obrazca pisno poučiti naslovnika, da lahko zavrne sprejem pisanja, ki se vroča, in sicer v času vročitve ali tako, da pisanje v enem tednu vrne organu za sprejem, če ni napisano v jeziku, ki ga naslovnik razume, ali v uradnem jeziku ali v enem od uradnih jezikov kraja vročitve.
This rule should also apply to the subsequent service once the addressee has exercised his right of refusal.
To pravilo bi se moralo uporabljati tudi za naknadne vročitve, potem ko je naslovnik uporabil pravico do zavrnitve.
These rules on refusal should also apply to service by diplomatic or consular agents, service by postal services and direct service.
Ta pravila o zavrnitvi bi se morala uporabljati tudi za vročanje prek diplomatskih ali konzularnih predstavnikov za vročanje z uporabo poštnih storitev in za neposredno vročanje.
It should be established that the service of the refused document can be remedied through the service on the addressee of a translation of the document.
Določiti bi bilo treba, da se lahko vročitev zavrnjenega pisanja opravi z vročitvijo prevoda pisanja naslovniku.
Speed in transmission warrants documents being served within days of receipt of the document.
Hitrost pošiljanja upravičuje, da se pisanje vroči v nekaj dneh po njegovem prejemu.
However, if service has not been effected after one month has elapsed, the receiving agency should inform the transmitting agency.
V primeru, da se vročitev ne opravi po preteku enega meseca, bi moral organ za sprejem o tem obvestiti organ za pošiljanje.
The expiry of this period should not imply that the request be returned to the transmitting agency where it is clear that service is feasible within a reasonable period.
Potek tega obdobja ne bi smel pomeniti, da se zaprosilo vrne organu za pošiljanje, če je jasno, da je vročitev izvedljiva v razumnem roku.
The receiving agency should continue to take all necessary steps to effect the service of the document also in cases where it has not been possible to effect service within the month, for example, because the defendant has been away from his home on holiday or away from his office on business.
Organ za sprejem bi moral tudi v primerih, ko vročitve ni bilo mogoče opraviti v enem mesecu, na primer, ker je bil toženec zdoma zaradi dopusta ali ga ni bilo v službi zaradi službenega potovanja, nadaljevati z vsemi potrebnimi ukrepi za vročitev pisanja.
However, in order to avoid an open-ended obligation for the receiving agency to take steps to effect the service of a document, the transmitting agency should be able to specify a time limit in the standard form after which service is no longer required.
Vendar pa bi bilo treba organu za pošiljanje dati možnost, da v standardnem obrazcu določi rok, po katerem vročanje ni več potrebno, s čimer se organu za sprejem ne bi naložilo neomejene obveznosti nadaljevati s vsemi ukrepi za vročitev pisanja.
Given the differences between the Member States as regards their rules of procedure, the material date for the purposes of service varies from one Member State to another.
Zaradi razlik v postopkovnih pravilih med državami članicami je dejanski datum vročitve glede na državo članico različen.
Having regard to such situations and the possible difficulties that may arise, this Regulation should provide for a system where it is the law of the Member State addressed which determines the date of service.
Ob upoštevanju teh okoliščin in morebitnih težav, ki lahko nastanejo, bi morala ta uredba predvideti sistem, po katerem se dan vročitve določi po pravu zaprošene države članice.
However, where according to the law of a Member State a document has to be served within a particular period, the date to be taken into account with respect to the applicant should be that determined by the law of that Member State.
Kadar pa je treba v skladu s pravom države članice pisanje vročiti v določenem roku, se v zvezi s prosilcem upošteva tisti dan vročitve, ki ga določa pravo te države članice.
This double date system exists only in a limited number of Member States.
Ta sistem dvojnega datuma obstaja le v nekaterih državah članicah.
Those Member States which apply this system should communicate this to the Commission, which should publish the information in the Official Journal of the European Union and make it available through the European Judicial Network in Civil and Commercial Matters established by Council Decision 2001/470/EC [5].
Države članice, ki ta sistem uporabljajo, bi morale o tem obvestiti Komisijo, ta pa bi morala to informacijo objaviti v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in jo dati na voljo prek Evropske pravosodne mreže v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah, ustanovljene z Odločbo Sveta 2001/470/ES [5].
In order to facilitate access to justice, costs occasioned by recourse to a judicial officer or a person competent under the law of the Member State addressed should correspond to a single fixed fee laid down by that Member State in advance which respects the principles of proportionality and non-discrimination.
Da bi olajšali dostop do pravnega varstva, bi morali stroški, nastali zaradi storitve sodnega uradnika ali osebe, pristojne po pravu zaprošene države članice, ustrezati enotni fiksni taksi, ki jo ta država članica določi vnaprej, ob upoštevanju načel sorazmernosti in nediskriminacije.
The requirement of a single fixed fee should not preclude the possibility for Member States to set different fees for different types of service as long as they respect these principles.
Zahteva po enotni fiksni taksi ne bi smela izključevati možnosti držav članic, da, če upoštevajo ti dve načeli, določijo različne takse za različne vrste vročitev.
Each Member State should be free to effect service of documents directly by postal services on persons residing in another Member State by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt or equivalent.
Vsaka država članica bi morala imeti možnost, da osebam, ki imajo stalno prebivališče v drugi državi članici, vroči pisanja neposredno z uporabo poštnih storitev, in sicer s priporočenim pismom z vročilnico ali na drug, enakovreden način.
It should be possible for any person interested in a judicial proceeding to effect service of documents directly through the judicial officers, officials or other competent persons of the Member State addressed, where such direct service is permitted under the law of that Member State.
Vsaki osebi, ki jo zadeva nek sodni postopek, bi moralo biti omogočeno, da vroča pisanja neposredno po sodnih uradnikih, uradnikih ali drugih pristojnih osebah zaprošene države članice, kadar pravo te države članice dopušča takšno neposredno vročanje.
The Commission should draw up a manual containing information relevant for the proper application of this Regulation, which should be made available through the European Judicial Network in Civil and Commercial Matters.
Komisija bi morala pripraviti priročnik, ki bi vseboval informacije za pravilno uporabo te uredbe in ki bi bil na voljo prek Evropske pravosodne mreže v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah.
The Commission and the Member States should do their utmost to ensure that this information is up to date and complete especially as regards contact details of receiving and transmitting agencies.
Komisija in države članice bi si morale po svojih najboljših močeh prizadevati, da zagotovijo posodobljene in popolne informacije, zlasti kontaktne informacije organov za sprejem in pošiljanje.
In calculating the periods and time limits provided for in this Regulation, Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71 of the Council of 3 June 1971 determining the rules applicable to periods, dates and time limits [6] should apply.
Za štetje rokov in iztek rokov, določenih v tej uredbi, bi bilo treba uporabljati Uredbo Sveta (EGS, Euratom) št. 1182/71 z dne 3. junija 1971 o določitvi pravil glede rokov, datumov in iztekov rokov [6].
In particular, power should be conferred on the Commission to update or make technical amendments to the standard forms set out in the Annexes.
Zlasti bi bilo treba Komisiji podeliti pooblastila za posodabljanje ali tehnične prilagoditve standardnih obrazcev iz prilog.
Since those measures are of general scope and are designed to amend/delete non-essential elements of this Regulation, they must be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC.
Ker so ti ukrepi splošnega obsega in so namenjeni spremembi/črtanju nebistvenih določb te uredbe, bi jih bilo treba sprejeti v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 5a Sklepa 1999/468/ES.
This Regulation prevails over the provisions contained in bilateral or multilateral agreements or arrangements having the same scope, concluded by the Member States, and in particular the Protocol annexed to the Brussels Convention of 27 September 1968 [8] and the Hague Convention of 15 November 1965 [9] in relations between the Member States party thereto.
Ta uredba v razmerjih med državami članicami pogodbenicami prevlada nad določbami dvostranskih ali večstranskih sporazumov ali dogovorov z istim področjem uporabe, sklenjenih med državami članicami, zlasti pa nad Protokolom, ki je priložen k Bruseljski konvenciji z dne 27. septembra 1968 [8], in Haaško konvencijo z dne 15. novembra 1965 [9].
This Regulation does not preclude Member States from maintaining or concluding agreements or arrangements to expedite or simplify the transmission of documents, provided that they are compatible with this Regulation.
Ta uredba državam članicam ne preprečuje, da ohranijo ali sklenejo sporazume ali dogovore za pospešitev ali poenostavitev pošiljanja pisanj, pod pogojem, da so združljivi s to uredbo.
The information transmitted pursuant to this Regulation should enjoy suitable protection.
Informacije, ki se pošiljajo v skladu s to uredbo, bi morale biti ustrezno varovane.
This matter falls within the scope of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [10], and of Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) [11].
To vprašanje sodi na področje uporabe Direktive 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [10] ter Direktive 2002/58/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. julija 2002 o obdelavi osebnih podatkov in varstvu zasebnosti na področju elektronskih komunikacij (Direktiva o zasebnosti in elektronskih komunikacijah) [11].
No later than 1 June 2011 and every five years thereafter, the Commission should review the application of this Regulation and propose such amendments as may appear necessary.
Komisija bi morala najpozneje do 1. junija 2011 in potem vsakih pet let pregledati uporabo te uredbe in predlagati potrebne spremembe.
Since the objectives of this Regulation cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale or effects of the action, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Ker ciljev te uredbe države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker te cilje zaradi obsega ali učinkov ukrepov lažje doseže Skupnost, Skupnost lahko sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.
In order to make the provisions more easily accessible and readable, Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 should be repealed and replaced by this Regulation.
Zaradi lažje dostopnosti in berljivosti določb bi bilo treba Uredbo (ES) št. 1348/2000 razveljaviti in jo nadomestiti s to uredbo.
In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, the United Kingdom and Ireland are taking part in the adoption and application of this Regulation.
V skladu s členom 3 Protokola o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, Združeno kraljestvo in Irska sodelujeta pri sprejetju in uporabi te uredbe.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark does not take part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application,
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja –
This Regulation shall apply in civil and commercial matters where a judicial or extrajudicial document has to be transmitted from one Member State to another for service there.
Ta uredba se uporablja v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah, kadar je treba poslati sodno ali izvensodno pisanje iz ene države članice v drugo državo članico z namenom vročitve v slednji državi članici.
It shall not extend in particular to revenue, customs or administrative matters or to liability of the State for actions or omissions in the exercise of state authority (acta iure imperii).
Ne uporablja se zlasti za davčne, carinske ali upravne zadeve ali za odgovornost države za dejanja in opustitve dejanj pri izvajanju javne oblasti („acta iure imperii“).
This Regulation shall not apply where the address of the person to be served with the document is not known.
Ta uredba se ne uporablja, kadar naslov osebe, ki ji je treba vročiti pisanje, ni znan.
In this Regulation, the term ‘Member State’ shall mean the Member States with the exception of Denmark.
V tej uredbi izraz „država članica“ pomeni države članice razen Danske.
Transmitting and receiving agencies
Organi za pošiljanje in sprejem
Each Member State shall designate the public officers, authorities or other persons, hereinafter referred to as ‘transmitting agencies’, competent for the transmission of judicial or extrajudicial documents to be served in another Member State.
Vsaka država članica imenuje javne uradnike, organe ali druge osebe (v nadaljevanju „organi za pošiljanje“), ki so pristojni za pošiljanje sodnih ali izvensodnih pisanj z namenom vročitve v drugi državi članici.
Each Member State shall designate the public officers, authorities or other persons, hereinafter referred to as ‘receiving agencies’, competent for the receipt of judicial or extrajudicial documents from another Member State.
Vsaka država članica imenuje javne uradnike, organe ali druge osebe (v nadaljevanju „organi za sprejem“), ki so pristojni za sprejem sodnih ali izvensodnih pisanj iz druge države članice.
A Member State may designate one transmitting agency and one receiving agency, or one agency to perform both functions.
Država članica lahko imenuje en organ za pošiljanje in en organ za sprejem ali en organ, ki opravlja obe nalogi.
A federal State, a State in which several legal systems apply or a State with autonomous territorial units shall be free to designate more than one such agency.
Zvezna država, država, v kateri se uporablja več pravnih sistemov ali država z avtonomnimi teritorialnimi enotami ima možnost imenovati več kot en tak organ.
The designation shall have effect for a period of five years and may be renewed at five-year intervals.
Imenovanje učinkuje pet let in se lahko obnovi vsakih pet let.
Each Member State shall provide the Commission with the following information:
Vsaka država članica zagotovi Komisiji naslednje informacije:
the names and addresses of the receiving agencies referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3;
imena in naslove organov za sprejem iz odstavkov 2 in 3;
the geographical areas in which they have jurisdiction;
geografska območja, za katera so pristojni;
the means of receipt of documents available to them; and
razpoložljive načine sprejemanja pisanj in
the languages that may be used for the completion of the standard form set out in Annex I.
jezike, v katerih se lahko izpolni standardni obrazec iz Priloge I.
Member States shall notify the Commission of any subsequent modification of such information.
Države članice uradno obvestijo Komisijo o vsaki naknadni spremembi teh informacij.
Central body
Osrednji organ
Each Member State shall designate a central body responsible for:
Vsaka država članica imenuje osrednji organ, ki je odgovoren za:
supplying information to the transmitting agencies;
zagotavljanje informacij organom za pošiljanje;
seeking solutions to any difficulties which may arise during transmission of documents for service;
reševanje vseh težav, ki se lahko pojavijo pri pošiljanju pisanj za vročitev;
forwarding, in exceptional cases, at the request of a transmitting agency, a request for service to the competent receiving agency.
v izjemnih primerih in na zaprosilo organa za pošiljanje, posredovanje zaprosila za vročitev pristojnemu organu za sprejem.
A federal State, a State in which several legal systems apply or a State with autonomous territorial units shall be free to designate more than one central body.
Zvezna država, država, v kateri se uporablja več pravnih sistemov ali država z avtonomnimi teritorialnimi enotami ima možnost imenovati več kot en osrednji organ.
JUDICIAL DOCUMENTS
SODNA PISANJA
Transmission and service of judicial documents
Pošiljanje in vročanje sodnih pisanj
Transmission of documents
Pošiljanje pisanj
Judicial documents shall be transmitted directly and as soon as possible between the agencies designated pursuant to Article 2.
Pošiljanje sodnih pisanj med organi, imenovanimi na podlagi člena 2, poteka neposredno in čim hitreje.
The transmission of documents, requests, confirmations, receipts, certificates and any other papers between transmitting agencies and receiving agencies may be carried out by any appropriate means, provided that the content of the document received is true and faithful to that of the document forwarded and that all information in it is easily legible.
Pošiljanje pisanj, zaprosil, potrditev, potrdil o prejemu, drugih potrdil in vseh drugih listin med organi za pošiljanje in organi za sprejem lahko poteka na kakršen koli primeren način, pod pogojem, da ostane vsebina prejete listine istovetna vsebini poslane listine in da so vse informacije v njej dobro čitljive.