natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the cruises offered by Le Levant from Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon (i.e. outside Community waters) were mainly targeted at the North American market [50], both because of the marketing networks set up by CIL and the geographic location of the archipelago, which made it a cruise ‘hub’ (some 4600 kilometres from Paris, but only 25 kilometres from the Canadian coast) [51],the Commission also notes that according to the information it has received, no other operator established in the Community offers or offered in the period in question, cruises to Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon and that the cruises organised by Le Levant, which combined top luxury and unusual destinations, were clearly targeted at a very narrow segment of the cruise market, and one which was not highly developed in Europe.
ponudba križarjenj na potniški ladji Le Levant z odhodom iz Saint-Pierre in Miquelona (kar je zunaj voda Skupnosti) je bila pretežno usmerjena na severno-ameriški trg [50], tako zaradi trgovskih mrež družbe CIL kot zaradi dejstva, da je zaradi svojega geografskega položaja „vozlišče“ za križarjenja (približno 4600 kilometrov od Pariza in le 25 kilometrov od kanadske obale) [51],Komisija poudarja tudi, da v skladu z informacijami, ki so ji bile predložene, noben drug operater v Skupnosti ne ponuja oziroma v zadevnem obdobju ni ponujal križarjenj na območju Saint-Pierre in Miquelona in da so bila križarjenja na potniški ladji Le Levant s svojim razkošjem in neobičajnimi destinacijami usmerjena v zelo ozek segment trga križarjenj, ki je v Evropi manj razvit.
In the light of the above, the Commission finds that the aid in question could make a contribution to Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon’s development by creating jobs and diversifying its economy and that although modest, this contribution is greater than the distortion of trade between Member States that the aid could cause.
Na podlagi tega Komisija ugotavlja, da bi zadevna pomoč lahko prispevala k razvoju Saint-Pierre in Miquelona z ustvarjanjem delovnih mest in povečanjem razvejanosti njegovega gospodarstva ter da je prispevek, čeprav skromen, pomembnejši od izkrivljanja trgovine med državami članicami, ki jo pomoč lahko povzroči.
The Commission also finds that this aid was necessary.
Komisija ugotavlja tudi, da je bila pomoč potrebna.
The profitability forecasts for operating the vessel from Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon under the terms of the package approved by the French authorities were such that the project’s profitability could only be guaranteed as a result of the aid.
Obeti za donosnost obratovanja ladje v Saint-Pierre in Miquelonu so bili glede na paket, ki so ga sprejeli francoski organi, takšni, da brez pomoči donosnost projekta ne bi bila zagotovljena.
The project to build and operate Le Levant could therefore not have been achieved without the aid.
Projekt gradnje in obratovanja potniške ladje Le Levant se torej brez pomoči ne bi mogel uresničiti.
For the above reasons, the Commission therefore finds that the aid to Le Levant includes a ‘development component’.
Iz navedenih razlogov Komisija ugotavlja, da pomoč potniški ladji Le Levant vsebuje „razvojni element“.
The Commission finds that France has unlawfully implemented the aid in question in breach of Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je Francija nezakonito izvajala zadevno pomoč in s tem kršila določbe člena 88(3) Pogodbe.
However, the Commission considers that the aid constitutes development assistance pursuant to Article 4(7) of Directive 90/684/EEC and that it is therefore compatible with the common market,
Komisija kljub temu meni, da gre za razvojno pomoč v smislu člena 4(7) Direktive 90/684/EGS in da je na tej podlagi ta pomoč združljiva s skupnim trgom –
The State aid which France has implemented in favour of la Compagnie des Îles du Levant in respect of the construction of the cruise ship Le Levant is compatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč, ki jo je Francija dodelila družbi Compagnie des Îles du Levant za gradnjo potniške ladje Le Levant, je združljiva s skupnim trgom.
Done at Brussels, 20 May 2008.
V Bruslju, 20. maja 2008
OJ C 33, 5.2.2000, p. 6, and OJ C 23, 1.2.2007, p. 28.
UL C 33, 5.2.2000, str. 6, in UL C 23, 1.2.2007, str. 28.
OJ C 33, 5.2.2000, p. 6.
UL C 33, 5.2.2000, str. 6.
OJ L 327, 12.12.2001, p. 37.
UL L 327, 12.12.2001, str. 37.
Case T-34/02 EURL Le Levant 001 and Others v Commission [2006] ECR II-267.
Zadeva T-34/02, EURL Le Levant 001 proti Komisiji, ZOdl. 2006, str. II-267.
France had brought an earlier action for annulment of Decision 2001/882/EC which had been dismissed by the Court of Justice (Judgment of 3 October 2002, Case C-394/01 France v Commission [2002] ECR I-8245).
Francija je najprej nameravala s prizivom razveljaviti Odločbo 2001/882/ES, priziv je Sodišče zavrnilo (sodba z dne 3. oktobra 2002, zadeva C-394/01, Francija proti Komisiji, Recueil 2002, str. I-8245).
OJ C 23, 1.2.2007, p. 28.
UL C 23, 1.2.2007, str. 28.
The company concerned has asked for its identity not to be published.
Sporna družba je zaprosila, naj se njena identiteta ne objavi.
In this decision, therefore, it is referred to only as ‘the Bank’.
V tej odločbi bo zato omenjena pod nazivom „banka“.
A 242 km2 archipelago with some 6500 inhabitants, Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon is a French ‘overseas collectivity’ lying off the Canadian coast (approximately 25 km from Newfoundland).
Otočje s površino 242 km2, ki šteje okoli 6500 prebivalcev. Saint-Pierre in Miquelon je ena od čezmorskih skupnosti, ki so oddaljene od kanadske obale (oddaljena okoli 25 km od Nove Fundlandije).
CIL is a wholly controlled subsidiary of CIP.
CIL je hčerinska družba, ki jo stoodstotno nadzira CIP.
CIP is the guarantor of all commitments entered into by CIL as part of the Le Levant financing operation.
CIP jamči za vse obveznosti, ki jih CIL podpiše v okviru postopka financiranja paketa Le Levant.
The Commission does not therefore consider it necessary to distinguish between the two bodies and CIP and CIL are used interchangeably in this decision.
Komisija torej ugotavlja, da ni mogoče ločiti teh dveh pravnih oseb, zato bosta CIP in CIL izmenjaje uporabljeni v tej odločbi.
For events preceding the introduction of the euro, an indicative conversion rate of FRF 6,5 to EUR 1 has been used to convert amounts in French francs.
Zaradi dogodkov, ki so se zgodili pred uvedbo eura, so zneski informativno preračunani iz francoskih frankov v eure v menjalnem razmerju 6,5 FRF za 1 EUR.
According to the background documents submitted by the Le Levant project promoters to France’s Commission des opérations de bourse (COB, stock exchange committee), the shareholders would ‘… in theory reinvest practically the whole of their tax savings by subscribing to the joint-ownership companies’ annual capital increases.
Iz informativnih dokumentov, ki so jih predlagatelji projekta „Le Levant“ predložili francoski Komisiji za borzne postopke (COB) je razvidno, da bodo delničarji „… teoretično ponovno vložili skoraj vse svoje davčne prihranke in se s podpisom zavezali k letnemu povečanju kapitala solastniških družb. Povečanja kapitala bodo izvedena tako, da bo doseženo ravnotežje likvidnega kapitala družb, ne da bi to ustvarilo presežke“.
The capital increases will be done in such a way as to balance the companies’ accounts without leaving any surpluses’.
Glede likvidnega kapitala solastniških družb je iz „napovedanih izkazov poslovnega izida solastništva“, priloženih k dokumentaciji za COB, razvidno, da je bil predviden negativen izid poslovanja za vsako leto v obdobju 1996–2003.
Apart from two EURLs which were not deleted for technical reasons but have been inactive since 2 January 2004.
Z izjemo dveh EURL, ki nista mogli biti izbrisani zaradi tehničnih razlogov, vendar sta nedejavni od 2. januarja 2004.
For the Loi Paul, see the Commission Decision of 3 December 2001 (OJ C 30, 2.2.2002, p. 13) and for the Loi Girardin, see the Commission Decision of 11 November 2003 (OJ C 16, 22.1.2004, p. 24).
Za Loi Paul glej Odločbo Komisije z dne 3. decembra 2001 (UL C 30, 2.2.2002, str. 13) in za Loi Girardin Odločbo Komisije z dne 11. novembra 2003 (UL C 16, 22.1.2004, str. 24).
Commission Decision 1999/719/EC of 30 March 1999 on State aid which France is planning to grant as development aid in the sale of two cruise vessels to be built by Chantiers de l’Atlantique and operated by Renaissance Financial in French Polynesia (OJ L 292, 13.11.1999, p. 23).
Odločba Komisije 1999/719/ES z dne 30. marca 1999 o državni pomoči, ki jo Francija namerava dodeliti kot razvojno pomoč za prodajo dveh potniških ladij, zgrajenih v Chantiers de l’Atlantique, ki ju bo Renaissance Financial uporabljal v Francoski Polineziji (UL L 292, 13.11.1999, str. 23).
Judgment of 12 November 1998 in Case C-415/96 Spain v Commission [1998] ECR I-6993, paragraph 32.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 12. novembra 1998 v zadevi C-415/96, Španija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1998, str. I-6993, točka 32.
For this, see the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-415/96, in particular paragraphs 33 and 34.
Glej sodbo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zadevi C-415/96, zlasti točki 33 in 34.
See, for example, the Judgment of the Court of Justice of 10 January 2006 in Case C-222/04, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze/Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze, [2006] ECR.
Glej, na primer, sodbo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 10. januarja 2006 v zadevi C-222/04, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze proti Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze, ZOdl.
I-289, paragraph 129.
2006, str. I-289, točka 129.
Application for approval, p. 11.
Vloga za odobritev, stran 11.
Application for approval, pp. 11 and 15.
Vloga za odobritev, strani 11 in 15.
See the report on behalf of the National Finance, Budgetary Control and Accounts Committee on tax exemptions in the overseas departments and territories (Senate, ordinary session 2002-2003, report No 51, annexed to the record of the session of 7 November 2003).
Glej informativno poročilo, pripravljeno v imenu odbora za finance, proračunski nadzor in računovodske evidence o davčnih oprostitvah v čezmorskih državah in ozemljih (senat, redno zasedanje 2002–2003, poročilo št. 51, priloženo potrjenemu zapisniku seje z dne 7. novembra 2003).
OJ C 279, 25.10.1995, p. 3.
UL C 279, 25.10.1995, str. 3.
See Decision 1999/719/EC above.
Omenjena Odločba 1999/719/ES.
OJ C 307, 7.10.1998, p. 6.
UL C 307, 7.10.1998, str. 6.
This is further supported by the Commission’s more recent approach in the ‘GIE fiscaux’ case: Commission Decision 2007/256/EC of 20 December 2006 on the aid scheme implemented by France under Article 39 CA of the General Tax Code (OJ L 112, 30.4.2007, p. 41), paragraphs 101 to 103.
Ta pristop je še potrdila nedavno uvedena praksa Komisije v zadevi „GIE fiscaux“: Odločba Komisije z dne 20. decembra 2006 o shemi pomoči, ki jo je izvajala Francija na podlagi člena 39 CA Splošnega zakonika o davkih (UL L 112, 30.4.2007, str. 41), točke 101 do 103.
See, for example, the Cassa di Risparmio judgment above, paragraphs 107 and 108.
Glej na primer sodbo Cassa di Risparmio, točki 107 in 108.
Cassa di Risparmio, above, paragraphs 109 to 114.
Prej navedena sodba Cassa di Risparmio, točke 109 do 114.
Management mandate of the joint-ownership of the vessel Le Levant, Annex 4 of the file submitted to the COB (hereinafter the management mandate).
Mandat upravljanja solastništva potniške ladje Le Levant, Priloga 4 dokumenta, predloženega COB (v nadaljnjem besedilu „mandat upravljanja“).
Brochure ‘Become a joint-owner of the “Le Levant” cruise ship ’, included in the documents submitted to the COB.
Prospekt „Postanite solastnik potniške ladje ‚Le Levant‘ “, vključen v dokumentacijo, predloženo COB.
Under French maritime law, the fact of being joint-owner (copropriétaire) of a vessel does not automatically make you the shipowner (armateur).
Po francoskem pomorskem pravu, biti solastnik ladje ne pomeni samodejno biti njen lastnik.
This merely implies a presumption, which can be confirmed or overturned on the basis of management actions concerning the vessel, in order to identify, via these actions (appointment of the captain, responsibility for nautical and/or commercial management) who is the operator of the vessel (Articles 1 and 2 of Law No 69-8 of January 3 1969 concerning shipowning and maritime sales, as last amended).
To je le domneva, ki jo je mogoče potrditi ali zavrniti ob upoštevanju upravljavskih nalog v zvezi z ladjo, da se prek teh nalog (imenovanje kapitana, odgovornost za pomorsko in/ali gospodarsko upravljanje) ugotovi, kdo je operater ladje (zakon št. 69-8 z dne 3. januarja 1969 o lastništvu ladij in pomorski prodaji, kakor je bil spremenjen, člena 1 in 2).
See, for example, the judgments of the Court of Justice in Case C-241/94 France v Commission [1996] ECR I-4551, and in Case C-200/97 Ecotrade v Altiforni e Ferriere di Servola [1998] ECR I-7907.
Glej na primer sodbe Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 26. septembra 1996 v zadevi C-241/94, Francija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1996, str. I-4551, in z dne 1. decembra 1998 v zadevi C-200/97, Ecotrade proti Altiforni e Ferriere di Servola, Recueil 1998, str. I-7907.
See, to that effect, the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-308/00 Salzgitter v Commission [2004] ECR II-1933, paragraph 38.
Glej, v tem pomenu, sodbo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zadevi T-308/00, Salzgitter proti Komisiji, ZOdl. 2004, str. II-1933, točka 38.
See the judgment in Case C-156/98 Germany v Commission [2000] ECR I-6857, paragraph 30, and the case-law cited there.
Glej sodbo z dne 19. septembra 2000 v zadevi C-156/98, Nemčija proti Komisiji, Recueil, str. I-6857, točka 30, in navedeno sodno prakso.
See, in particular, the judgment of the Court in Case 730/79 Philip Morris v Commission [1979] ECR 2671, paragraphs 11 and 12.
Glej zlasti sodbo Sodišča z dne 17. septembra 1980 v zadevi 730/79, Philip Morris proti Komisiji, Recueil 1979, str. 2671, točki 11 in 12.
Judgment of the Court in Case C-142/87 Belgium v Commission [1990] ECR I-959, paragraph 35.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 21. marca 1990 v zadevi C-142/87, Belgija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1990, str. I-959, točka 35.
See the supplementary Decision of 6 December 2006, paragraph 72.
Glej dopolnilno odločbo z dne 6. decembra 2006, točka 72.
Directive 90/684/EEC ceased to have effect on 31 December 1997.
Direktiva 90/684/EGS je prenehala veljati dne 31. decembra 1997.
It is, however, still relevant for examination of this case as its provisions were in force at the time the aid was granted, in accordance with the Commission notice on the determination of the applicable rules for the assessment of unlawful State aid (OJ C 119, 22.5.2002, p. 22).
Še vedno pa ostaja primerna za analizo te zadeve glede na to, da so bile njene določbe veljavne v trenutku dodelitve pomoči v skladu s Sporočilom Komisije o določitvi pravil, ki se uporabljajo pri presoji nezakonitih državnih pomoči (UL C 119, 22.5.2002, str. 22).
Judgment of the Court in Joined Cases C-356/90 and C-180/91 Belgium v Commission [1993] ECR I-2323, paragraph 14.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 18. maja 1993 v pridruženih zadevah C-356/90 in C-180/91, Belgija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1993, str. I-2323, točka 14.
Judgment of the Court in Case C-400/92 Germany v Commission [1994] ECR I-4701.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 5. oktobra 1994 v zadevi C-400/92, Nemčija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1994, str. I-4701.
This analysis is in line with that in the abovementioned ‘Renaissance’ case.
Ta analiza je v skladu z analizo v prej omenjeni zadevi „Renaissance“.
Decision 2001/882/EC, recital 33.
Odločba 2001/882/ES, uvodna izjava 33.
According to the French authorities, 14 to 16 nationals of Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon were employed on board during the first five years of Le Levant’s operation, i.e. 1999-2003.
Po ocenah francoskih organov je bilo v prvih petih letih obratovanja ladje Le Levant, tj. med letoma 1999 in 2003, na potniški ladji zaposlenih od 14 do 16 oseb iz Saint-Pierre in Miquelona.
During the same period, operation of Le Levant generated 11 to 12 jobs on land.
V istem obdobju se je z obratovanjem potniške ladje Le Levant ustvarilo še 11 do 12 delovnih mest na kopnem.
However, for reasons linked to the principle of legal certainty, for the purposes of this Decision the Commission will only take into account facts concerning the period prior to Decision 2001/882/EC.
Kar zadeva načelo pravne varnosti, bo Komisija v tej odločbi upoštevala le dejstva, ki se nanašajo na obdobje pred Odločbo 2001/882/ES.
Likewise, the Commission will only consider the lowest number of jobs.
Prav tako bo Komisija upoštevala le najnižje število delovnih mest.
This period covers the whole of 2001.
To obdobje zajema celotno leto 2001.
It should also be noted that the French authorities estimate the expenditure directly generated by Le Levant in 2002 and 2003 at EUR 1,66 million a year, i.e. some EUR 3,4 million for the first five years of Le Levant’s operation.
Poleg tega je mogoče opaziti, da francoski organi ocenjujejo stroške, ki jih je potniška ladja Le Levant neposredno ustvarila v letih 2002 in 2003 v znesku 1,66 milijona EUR na leto, kar pomeni okoli 3,4 milijona EUR v prvih petih letih obratovanja potniške ladje Le Levant.
Number of job seekers at 31 December 1999 (report by the Institut d’émission des départements d’outremer (IEDOM): ‘Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon in 1999’).
Število iskalcev dela dne 31. decembra 1999 (poročilo „Saint-Pierre in Miquelon leta 1999“, ki ga je izdal Institut d’émission des départements d’outremer).
That is, for the period 1999-2001, some EUR 1,66 million as against EUR 0,84 million (FRF 5,52 million) estimated by the Commission in Decision 2001/882/EC.
Oziroma okoli 1,66 milijona EUR v obdobju 1999–2001 v primerjavi z 0,84 milijona EUR (5,52 milijona FRF), kolikor je Komisija ocenila v Odločbi 2001/882/ES.
In 1999, the building and public works and the fisheries sectors, widely supported by the public authorities, accounted for 63,8 % of employment.
V letu 1999 so sektorji gradbeništva, javnih del in ribolova, ki so jih v precejšnji meri podpirali javni organi, predstavljali 63,8 % delovnih mest.
Civil servants made up 25,8 % of the working population (see report by the Institut d’émission des départements d’outremer (IEDOM): ‘Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon in 1999’).
Uradniki so predstavljali 25,8 % aktivnega prebivalstva (poročilo „Saint-Pierre in Miquelon leta 1999“, ki ga je izdal Institut d’émission des départements d’outremer).
There were 2134 cruise passengers in 1995, 820 in 1996, 785 in 1997, 2123 in 1997, 2123 in 1998, 428 in 1999, rising to 3242 in 2000 and 2474 in 2001.
Potnikov na križarjenjih je bilo leta 1995 2134, leta 1996 820, leta 1997 785, leta 1998 2123, leta 1999 428, potem pa 3242 leta 2000 in 2474 leta 2001.
It should also be noted that the level was maintained throughout the whole period of Le Levant’s operation, with 5120 cruise passengers in 2002 and 3022 in 2003.
Poleg tega je opaziti, da se je raven med celotnim obdobjem obratovanja potniške ladje Le Levant ohranjala, in sicer 5120 potnikov leta 2002 in 3022 leta 2003.
It is also clear from the request for approval submitted to the French authorities by the Bank and CIP that the ‘Le Levant’ project depended ‘closely on the links forged between CIP and Travel Dynamics […] a US tour operator which specialises in organising cruises’.
Iz vloge za soglasje, ki sta jo francoskim organom poslali banka in družba CIP, izhaja, da je bil projekt „Le Levant“ zelo odvisen od „vezi med družbama CIP in Travel Dynamics […], ameriškim izletniškim operaterjem, specializiranim za organizacijo križarjenj“.
CIP emphasises that the ‘Le Levant’ project is based on experience gained with its first ship, Le Ponant, whose ‘customers … chiefly North American … now mainly come from the partnership established with Travel Dynamics’.
Družba CIP poudarja, da je bil projekt „Le Levant“ razvit na podlagi preteklih izkušenj z njeno prvo ladjo le Ponant, katere „stranke … pretežno severno-ameriške … izhajajo danes predvsem iz sodelovanja z družbo Travel Dynamics“.
CIP adds that it has shown that ‘it was capable of attracting North American customers on to a French ship …’.
Družba CIP dodaja, da je pokazala, da „je sposobna privabiti severno-ameriške stranke na francosko ladjo …“.
It is also clear from the report by the Institut d’émission des départements d’outremer (IEDOM): ‘Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon in 1999’ (page 37) that in 1999 the destination was sold by 11 North American tour operators as against only two French tour operators.
Iz poročila „Saint-Pierre in Miquelon leta 1999“, ki ga je izdal Institut d’émission des départements d’outremer (stran 37), je razvidno, da je destinacijo v letu 1999 tržilo 11 severno-ameriških izletniških operaterjev v nasprotju z le dvema francoskima izletniškima operaterjema.
Under Decision 2003/66/EC of 24 July 2002 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case No COMP/M.2706 — Carnival Corporation/P&O Princess) (OJ L 248, 30.9.2003, p. 1), the Commission already concluded that the market for cruises was still predominantly of a national character.
Komisija je v okviru Odločbe 2003/667/ES z dne 24. julija 2002, ki izraža, da je bila izvedba koncentracije združljiva s skupnim trgom in delovanjem Sporazuma EGP (Zadeva COMP/M.2706 – Carnival Corporation/P & O Princess) (UL L 248, 30.9.2003, str. 1), ugotovila, da je trg križarjenj predvsem nacionalni trg.
It is quite clear from the management mandate that CIL is responsible for all aspects of operating the vessel and has all the necessary powers, so that investors cannot interfere in its operation in any way.
Iz mandata upravljanja je jasno razvidno, da je družba CIL odgovorna za vse vidike obratovanja ladje in razpolaga z vsemi potrebnimi pristojnostmi, tako da je vsakršno vmešavanje vlagateljev v obratovanje ladje izključeno.
Accordingly:
Zato:
Opportunities for reorientation were considerably hampered by the small size of the archipelago and its population, its relative isolation and limited economy.
Majhnost otočja in števila njegovega prebivalstva, njegova precejšnja izoliranost in ozka usmerjenost gospodarstva so znatno zmanjšali možnosti take preusmeritve.
Diversifying into tourism therefore seemed to be the best option, taking advantage of the territory’s untouched nature and its proximity to North America.
Preusmerjanje na turizem na osnovi neokrnjene narave na otočju in bližine severno-ameriške celine bi bilo lahko zanimiva možnost.
Regarding the joint-ownership companies’ accounts, the ‘forecast profit-and-loss accounts of the joint-ownership’ annexed to the documents submitted to the COB show a projected negative operating result for each year in the period 1996-2003. [12] Application of the Bank and CIP for approval, dated 19 August 1996 (the ‘application for approval’), pp. 21-22.
Prošnja za soglasje, ki sta jo predložili banka in družba CIP z dne 19. avgusta 1996 (v nadaljnjem besedilu „predlog dogovora“), strani 21–22.
It should first be noted that under the formal terms of the package, it is the investors, through their EURLs brought together in the joint ownership vehicle, who are presented as owners and operators of the vessel, on their own account.
Najprej je treba omeniti, da so na podlagi formalnih pogojev paketa vlagatelji, ki so s svojimi družbami EURL združeni v solastništvu, predstavljeni kot solastniki in operaterji ladje v svojo lastno korist.
CIL’s role, on the other hand, is simply that of the vessel’s manager ‘for the account and risk of the joint ownership vehicle’ [28].
Pri tem se vloga družbe CIL omejuje na upravljavca ladje „za račun in na tveganje solastništva“ [28].
It is, of course, perfectly feasible for an owner/operator to entrust a manager with the day-to-day management of his economic activities.
Seveda pa je povsem mogoče, da lastnik-operater vsakodnevno upravljanje svoje gospodarske dejavnosti poveri upravljavcu.