natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Cooperation between the proposed acquirer and the competent authorities should thus remain intrinsic to the entire assessment period.
Sodelovanje med bodočim pridobiteljem in pristojnimi organi bi bilo torej bistveno za celotno ocenjevalno obdobje.
Regular contact between the proposed acquirer and the competent authority of the regulated entity in which the acquisition is proposed may also commence in anticipation of a formal notification.
Redni stiki med bodočim pridobiteljem in organom, pristojnim za regulirani subjekt, v katerem naj bi prišlo do pridobitve, se lahko vzpostavijo že pred uradnim obvestilom.
Such cooperation should imply a genuine effort to assist each other in order, for example, to avoid unanticipated requests for information or the submission of information late in the assessment period.
Takšno sodelovanje naj bi izhajalo iz pristnega prizadevanja za medsebojno pomoč, pri čemer pa naj bi se na primer izogibali nenapovedanim zahtevam po informacijah ali predložitvi informacij v času, ko se ocenjevalno obdobje že izteka.
With regard to the prudential assessment, the criterion concerning the ‘reputation of the proposed acquirer’ implies the determination of whether any doubts exist about the integrity and professional competence of the proposed acquirer and whether these doubts are founded.
Glede na skrbno oceno obsega merilo o „ugledu bodočega pridobitelja“ določitev, ali obstajajo kakršni koli dvomi o neoporečnosti in strokovni usposobljenosti bodočega pridobitelja in ali so ti dvomi utemeljeni.
Such doubts may arise, for instance, from past business conduct.
Taki dvomi lahko izvirajo npr. iz preteklega poslovanja.
The assessment of the reputation is of particular relevance if the proposed acquirer is an unregulated entity but should be facilitated if the acquirer is authorised and supervised within the European Union.
Ocena ugleda ima poseben pomen, če je bodoči pridobitelj nereguliran subjekt, vendar bi jo bilo treba poenostaviti, če je ta pridobil dovoljenje in je nadzorovan v EU.
A list established by the Member State should specify the information that may be requested for the purpose of assessments, strictly according to the criteria set out in this Directive.
Seznam, ki ga sestavi država članica, naj bi navajal podatke, ki se lahko zahtevajo za oceno, strogo po merilih iz te direktive.
The information should be proportionate and adjusted to the nature of the proposed acquisition, in particular if the proposed acquirer is an unregulated entity or established in a third country.
Podatki bi morali biti sorazmerni in prilagojeni vrsti predlagane pridobitve, zlasti če je bodoči pridobitelj nereguliran subjekt ali ima sedež v tretji državi.
Provision should also be made for the possibility to request less extensive information in justified cases.
Potrebno bi bilo tudi predvideti možnost, da se v upravičenih primerih zahtevajo manj obsežne informacije.
It is essential that the competent authorities work in close cooperation with each other when assessing the suitability of a proposed acquirer that is a regulated entity authorised in another Member State or in another sector.
Tesno sodelovanje med pristojnimi organi je bistvenega pomena, kadar se ocenjuje ustreznost bodočega pridobitelja, ki je nadzorovan subjekt, ki je pridobil dovoljenje v drugi državi članici ali v drugem sektorju.
While it is considered appropriate that the responsibility for the final decision regarding the prudential assessment remains with the competent authority responsible for the supervision of the entity in which the acquisition is proposed, that competent authority should take into full account the opinion of the competent authority responsible for the supervision of the proposed acquirer, particularly as regards the assessment criteria directly related to the proposed acquirer.
Čeprav velja za ustrezno, da odgovornost za končno odločitev v zvezi s skrbno oceno ohrani pristojni organ, ki je odgovoren za nadzor nad subjektom, v katerem naj bi prišlo do pridobitve, pa bi moral ta pristojni organ v celoti upoštevati mnenje pristojnega organa, odgovornega za nadzor nad bodočim pridobiteljem, zlasti v zvezi z ocenjevalnimi merili, ki so neposredno povezana z bodočim pridobiteljem.
The Commission should, in accordance with the rights and obligations set out in the Treaty, be able to monitor the application of the provisions regarding the prudential assessment of acquisitions in order to fulfil the tasks assigned to it with regard to the enforcement of Community law.
Komisiji bi bilo treba v skladu s pravicami in obveznostmi, določenimi v Pogodbi, omogočiti spremljanje uporabe določb o skrbni oceni pridobitev, da bi lahko opravila naloge, ki so ji dodeljene v zvezi z izvrševanjem prava Skupnosti.
Having regard to Article 296 of the Treaty, the Member States should cooperate with the Commission by providing it, once the assessment procedure has been completed, with information pertaining to prudential assessments carried out by their competent authorities where such information is requested for the sole purpose of determining whether Member States have infringed their obligations under this Directive.
Ob upoštevanju člena 296 Pogodbe bi morale države članice sodelovati s Komisijo tako, da ji po končanem ocenjevalnem postopku pošljejo podatke o skrbnih ocenah, ki so jih opravili njihovi pristojni organi, če se ti podatki zahtevajo samo za namene ugotavljanja, ali je država članica kršila svoje obveznosti po tej direktivi.
The assessment criteria may, in the future, need adjustments to take into account market developments and the need for a uniform application throughout the Community.
Ocenjevalna merila bo morda treba v prihodnosti prilagoditi zaradi upoštevanja razvoja dogodkov na trgu in potrebe po enotni uporabi v vsej Skupnosti.
Such technical adjustments should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission.
Zato je treba sprejeti takšne tehnične prilagoditve v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely the establishment of harmonised procedural rules and assessment criteria throughout the Community, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Ker države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči ciljev te direktive v zvezi z vzpostavitvijo usklajenih postopkovnih pravil in ocenjevalnih meril v vsej Skupnosti ter bi bilo mogoče te zaradi njihovega obsega in učinkov lažje doseči na ravni Skupnosti, lahko Skupnost sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne presega okvira, potrebnega za dosego teh ciljev.
The Community's intention is to keep its financial markets open to the rest of the world and thus to help improve the liberalisation of the global financial markets in third countries.
Namen Skupnosti je ohraniti svoje finančne trge odprte za preostali svet in torej okrepiti liberalizacijo svetovnih finančnih trgov v tretjih državah.
It would be beneficial for all market participants to achieve equivalent access to investment worldwide.
Vsem udeležencem na trgu bi koristilo, če bi imeli enake možnosti investiranja po svetu.
Member States should report to the Commission cases in which Community credit institutions, investment firms, other financial institutions or insurance companies acquiring credit institutions, investment firms, other financial institutions or insurance companies situated in a third country are not granted the same treatment as domestic acquirers and encounter major impediments.
Države članice bi morale Komisiji poročati o primerih, ko kreditne institucije, investicijska podjetja, druge finančne institucije ali zavarovalnice Skupnosti, ki pridobivajo kreditne institucije, investicijska podjetja, druge finančne institucije ali zavarovalnice v tretjih državah, niso enako obravnavane kot domači pridobitelji in se srečujejo z večjimi ovirami.
The Commission should propose measures to remedy such cases or raise them in an appropriate forum.
Komisija bi morala predlagati ukrepe za odpravo takih primerov ali jih obravnavati v ustreznih forumih.
In accordance with point 34 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making, Member States are encouraged to draw up, for themselves and in the interests of the Community, their own tables illustrating, as far as possible, the correlation between this Directive and the transposition measures, and to make them public.
Države članice je treba v skladu s točko 34 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje spodbujati, da za svoje lastne potrebe in za potrebe Skupnosti pripravijo ter objavijo lastne preglednice, v katerih bo kar najbolje prikazano razmerje med direktivo in ukrepi za prenos.
Directives 92/49/EEC, 2002/83/EC, 2004/39/EC, 2005/68/EC and 2006/48/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,
V skladu s tem bi bilo treba spremeniti direktive 92/49/EGS, 2002/83/ES, 2004/39/ES, 2005/68/ES in 2006/48/ES –
Directive 92/49/EEC is hereby amended as follows:
Direktiva 92/49/EGS se spremeni, kakor sledi:
in Article 1, point (g), the second paragraph shall be replaced by the following:
v točki (g) člena 1 se drugi odstavek nadomesti z:
Member States shall require any natural or legal person or such persons acting in concert (hereinafter referred to as the proposed acquirer), who have taken a decision either to acquire, directly or indirectly, a qualifying holding in an insurance undertaking or to further increase, directly or indirectly, such a qualifying holding in an insurance undertaking as a result of which the proportion of the voting rights or of the capital held would reach or exceed 20 %, 30 % or 50 % or so that the insurance undertaking would become its subsidiary (hereinafter referred to as the proposed acquisition), first to notify in writing the competent authorities of the insurance undertaking in which they are seeking to acquire or increase a qualifying holding, indicating the size of the intended holding and relevant information, as referred to in Article 15b(4).
Države članice zahtevajo od vsake fizične ali pravne osebe ali takšnih oseb, ki delujejo usklajeno (v nadaljevanju ‚bodoči pridobitelj‘) in ki so se odločile, da neposredno ali posredno pridobijo ali dodatno povečajo kvalificirani delež v zavarovalnici, in bi zaradi tega bil njihov delež glasovalnih pravic ali delež kapitala enak ali večji od 20 %, 30 % ali 50 % ali takšen, da bi zavarovalnica postala njihovo odvisno podjetje (v nadaljevanju ‚predlagana pridobitev‘), da najprej pisno obvestijo pristojne organe zavarovalnice, v kateri skušajo pridobiti ali povečati kvalificirani delež, o velikosti predvidenega deleža in jim sporočijo ustrezne informacije iz člena 15b(4).
Member States need not apply the 30 % threshold where, in accordance with Article 9(3)(a) of Directive 2004/109/EC, they apply a threshold of one-third.’;
Državam članicam ni treba uporabiti 30 % praga, če v skladu s členom 9(3)(a) Direktive 2004/109/ES uporabljajo prag ene tretjine.“;
Paragraph 1a shall be deleted;
odstavek 1a se črta;
Paragraph 2 shall be replaced by the following:
odstavek 2 se nadomesti z:
Member States shall require any natural or legal person who has taken a decision to dispose, directly or indirectly, of a qualifying holding in an insurance undertaking first to notify in writing the competent authorities of the home Member State, indicating the size of his intended holding.
Države članice zahtevajo od vsake fizične ali pravne osebe, ki se je odločila, da bi neposredno ali posredno odsvojila kvalificirani delež v zavarovalnici, da najprej pisno uradno obvesti pristojne organe matične države članice in navede velikost nameravanega deleža.
Such a person shall likewise notify the competent authorities if he has taken a decision to reduce his qualifying holding so that the proportion of the voting rights or of the capital held would fall below 20 %, 30 % or 50 % or so that the insurance undertaking would cease to be his subsidiary.
Enako mora oseba uradno obvestiti pristojne organe matične države članice, če se je odločila, da bi zmanjšala svoj kvalificirani delež tako, da bi razmerje njenih glasovalnih pravic ali deleža kapitala padlo pod 20 %, 30 % ali 50 % ali da bi zavarovalnica prenehala biti njeno odvisno podjetje.
The competent authorities shall, promptly and in any event within two working days following receipt of the notification required under Article 15(1), as well as following the possible subsequent receipt of the information referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, acknowledge receipt thereof in writing to the proposed acquirer.
Pristojni organi takoj, vsekakor pa v dveh delovnih dneh po prejemu uradnega obvestila, zahtevanega v skladu s členom 15(1), ter po morebitnem kasnejšem prejemu informacij iz odstavka 2 tega člena bodočemu pridobitelju pisno potrdijo njegov prejem.
The competent authorities shall have a maximum of 60 working days as from the date of the written acknowledgement of receipt of the notification and all documents required by the Member State to be attached to the notification on the basis of the list referred to in Article 15b(4) (hereinafter referred to as the assessment period), to carry out the assessment provided for in Article 15b(1) (hereinafter referred to as the assessment).
Pristojni organi imajo na voljo največ šestdeset delovnih dni po datumu pisnega potrdila o prejemu uradnega obvestila in vseh dokumentov, za katere države članice zahtevajo, da se priložijo uradnemu obvestilu na podlagi seznama, omenjenega v členu 15b(4) (v nadaljevanju ‚ocenjevalno obdobje‘), da opravijo oceno iz člena 15b(1) (v nadaljevanju ‚ocena‘).
The competent authorities shall inform the proposed acquirer of the date of the expiry of the assessment period at the time of acknowledging receipt.
Pristojni organi ob potrditvi prejema obvestijo predlaganega pridobitelja o datumu izteka ocenjevalnega obdobja.
The competent authorities may, during the assessment period, if necessary, and no later than on the 50th working day of the assessment period, request any further information that is necessary to complete the assessment.
Pristojni organi lahko po potrebi v ocenjevalnem obdobju, vendar ne kasneje kot petdeseti delovni dan ocenjevalnega obdobja, zaprosijo za dodatne informacije, potrebne za dopolnitev ocene.
Such request shall be made in writing and shall specify the additional information needed.
Ta zahteva mora biti pisna, v njej pa je treba opredeliti, katere dodatne informacije so potrebne.
For the period between the date of request for information by the competent authorities and the receipt of a response thereto by the proposed acquirer, the assessment period shall be interrupted.
Za čas, ki poteče od datuma, ko pristojni organi zahtevajo informacije, do datuma, ko prejmejo odgovor predlaganega pridobitelja, se ocenjevalno obdobje prekine.
The interruption shall not exceed 20 working days.
Prekinitev ne sme presegati dvajsetih delovnih dni.
Any further requests by the competent authorities for completion or clarification of the information shall be at their discretion but may not result in an interruption of the assessment period.
Pristojni organi lahko po lastni presoji postavijo dodatne zahteve za dopolnitev ali pojasnitev informacij, vendar se zaradi teh zahtev ocenjevalno obdobje ne prekine.
The competent authorities may extend the interruption referred to in the second subparagraph of paragraph 2 up to 30 working days if the proposed acquirer is:
Pristojni organi lahko prekinitev iz drugega pododstavka odstavka 2 podaljšajo na največ trideset delovnih dni, če je bodoči pridobitelj:
situated or regulated outside the Community; or
reguliran ali ima sedež zunaj Skupnosti; ali
a natural or legal person not subject to supervision under this Directive or Directives 85/611/EEC, 2002/83/EC, 2004/39/EC, 2005/68/EC or 2006/48/EC.
če je fizična ali pravna oseba in ni podvržen nadzoru po tej direktivi ali po direktivah 85/611/EGS, 2002/83/ES, 2004/39/ES, 2005/68/ES in 2006/48/ES.
If the competent authorities, upon completion of the assessment, decide to oppose the proposed acquisition, they shall, within two working days, and not exceeding the assessment period, inform the proposed acquirer in writing and provide the reasons for that decision.
Če se pristojni organi po opravljeni oceni odločijo, da bodo predlagani pridobitvi nasprotovali, o tem v dveh delovnih dneh in pred iztekom ocenjevalnega obdobja pisno obvestijo predlaganega pridobitelja in navedejo razloge za svojo odločitev.
Subject to national law, an appropriate statement of the reasons for the decision may be made accessible to the public at the request of the proposed acquirer.
Ob upoštevanju nacionalne zakonodaje se lahko na zahtevo predlaganega pridobitelja ustrezno utemeljitev odločitve objavi.
This shall not prevent a Member State from allowing the competent authority to make such disclosure in the absence of a request by the proposed acquirer.
To državi članici ne preprečuje, da pristojnemu organu dovoli objavo, ne da bi bodoči pridobitelj to zahteval.
If the competent authorities do not oppose the proposed acquisition within the assessment period in writing, it shall be deemed to be approved.
Če pristojni organi predlagani pridobitvi v ocenjevalnem obdobju ne nasprotujejo pisno, se šteje, da je predlagana pridobitev odobrena.
The competent authorities may fix a maximum period for concluding the proposed acquisition and extend it where appropriate.
Pristojni organi lahko določijo skrajni rok za izpeljavo predlagane pridobitve in ga po potrebi podaljšajo.
Member States may not impose requirements for the notification to and approval by the competent authorities of direct or indirect acquisitions of voting rights or capital that are more stringent than those set out in this Directive.
Države članice ne smejo predpisati strožjih zahtev glede obveščanja pristojnih organov in njihove odobritve neposrednih ali posrednih pridobitev glasovalnih pravic ali kapitala od tistih, ki so določene v tej direktivi.
Article 15b
Člen 15b
In assessing the notification provided for in Article 15(1) and the information referred to in Article 15a(2), the competent authorities shall, in order to ensure the sound and prudent management of the insurance undertaking in which an acquisition is proposed, and having regard to the likely influence of the proposed acquirer on the insurance undertaking, appraise the suitability of the proposed acquirer and the financial soundness of the proposed acquisition against all of the following criteria:
Pri ocenjevanju uradnega obvestila iz člena 15(1) in informacij iz člena 15a(2) pristojni organi zaradi zagotavljanja varnega in skrbnega upravljanja zavarovalnice, v kateri naj bi prišlo do pridobitve, in ob upoštevanju verjetnega vpliva bodočega pridobitelja na zavarovalnico ocenijo ustreznost bodočega pridobitelja in finančno trdnost predlagane pridobitve po vseh naslednjih merilih:
the reputation of the proposed acquirer;
ugled predlaganega pridobitelja;
the reputation and experience of any person who will direct the business of the insurance undertaking as a result of the proposed acquisition;
ugled in izkušnje vseh, ki bodo zaradi predlagane pridobitve vodili dejavnost zavarovalnice;
the financial soundness of the proposed acquirer, in particular in relation to the type of business pursued and envisaged in the insurance undertaking in which the acquisition is proposed;
finančna trdnost bodočega pridobitelja, zlasti v zvezi z vrsto opravljanih in načrtovanih dejavnosti v zavarovalnici, v kateri si prizadeva za pridobitev;
whether the insurance undertaking will be able to comply and continue to comply with the prudential requirements based on this Directive and, where applicable, other Directives, notably, Directives 73/239/EEC, 98/78/EC, 2002/13/EC and 2002/87/EC, in particular, whether the group of which it will become a part has a structure that makes it possible to exercise effective supervision, effectively exchange information among the competent authorities and determine the allocation of responsibilities among the competent authorities;
ali bo zavarovalnica lahko izpolnila in naprej izpolnjevala zahteve v zvezi s skrbno oceno na podlagi te direktive in po potrebi drugih direktiv, zlasti direktiv 73/239/EGS, 98/78/ES, 2002/13/ES in 2002/87/ES, pri tem je še posebej pomembno, ali ima skupina, katere del bo postala, strukture, ki zagotavljajo izvajanje učinkovitega nadzora, učinkovito izmenjavo informacij med pristojnimi organi in razdelitev odgovornosti med pristojnimi organi;
whether there are reasonable grounds to suspect that, in connection with the proposed acquisition, money laundering or terrorist financing within the meaning of Article 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC is being or has been committed or attempted, or that the proposed acquisition could increase the risk thereof.
ali obstajajo razlogi za utemeljen sum, da gre ali je šlo v zvezi s predlagano pridobitvijo za pranje denarja ali financiranje teroristov v smislu člena 1 Direktive 2005/60/ES ali za poskus tega ter da predlagana pridobitev lahko poveča tveganje za takšno ravnanje.
The competent authorities may oppose the proposed acquisition only if there are reasonable grounds for doing so on the basis of the criteria set out in paragraph 1 or if the information provided by the proposed acquirer is incomplete.
Pristojni organi lahko nasprotujejo predlagani pridobitvi samo, če za to obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi na podlagi meril iz odstavka 1 ali če so informacije, ki jih je predložil bodoči pridobitelj, nepopolne.
Member States shall neither impose any prior conditions in respect of the level of holding that must be acquired nor allow their competent authorities to examine the proposed acquisition in terms of the economic needs of the market.
Države članice ne smejo določiti nobenih predhodnih pogojev glede obsega deleža, ki ga je treba pridobiti, niti ne smejo dovoliti svojim pristojnim organom, da preučijo predlagano pridobitev v smislu gospodarskih potreb trga.
Member States shall make publicly available a list specifying the information that is necessary to carry out the assessment and that must be provided to the competent authorities at the time of notification referred to in Article 15(1).
Države članice dajo javnosti na voljo seznam informacij, ki so potrebne za izvedbo ocene in jih je treba predložiti pristojnim organom sočasno z obvestilom iz člena 15(1).
The information required shall be proportionate and adapted to the nature of the proposed acquirer and the proposed acquisition.
Obseg zahtevanih informacij mora biti sorazmeren in prilagojen vrsti predlaganega pridobitelja in predlagane pridobitve.
Member States shall not require information that is not relevant for a prudential assessment.
Države članice ne smejo zahtevati informacij, ki za skrbno oceno niso pomembne.
Notwithstanding Article 15a(1), (2) and (3), where two or more proposals to acquire or increase qualifying holdings in the same insurance undertaking have been notified to the competent authority, the latter shall treat the proposed acquirers in a non-discriminatory manner.
Če je bil pristojni organ uradno obveščen o dveh ali več predlogih za pridobitev ali povečanje kvalificiranih deležev v isti zavarovalnici, ne glede na člen 15a(1), (2) in (3), vse bodoče pridobitelje obravnava brez diskriminacije.
Article 15c
Člen 15c
The relevant competent authorities shall work in full consultation with each other when carrying out the assessment if the proposed acquirer is one of the following:
Ustrezni pristojni organi se med seboj o vsem posvetujejo pri opravljanju ocenjevanja pridobitve, če je bodoči pridobitelj: