natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Some interested parties argued that the Community industry was unable to restructure and to fully benefit from the anti-dumping duties imposed for many years on a wide range of third countries.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so trdile, da se industrija Skupnosti ni zmogla prestrukturirati in v celoti izkoristiti protidampinških dajatev, ki so več let veljale za številne tretje države.
However, it should be considered that during that number of years, the Community industry has been suffering from trade distortion and dumped prices which third countries practiced in turn.
Vendar je treba upoštevati, da je industrija Skupnosti vsa ta leta trpela škodo zaradi izkrivljanja trgovine in dampinških cen tretjih držav.
The Community market was therefore systematically biased by these distortions thus preventing the Community industry to recover from dumping practices and take business decisions on a sound basis.
Trg Skupnosti je bil zato nenehno izkrivljen, kar je industriji Skupnosti preprečilo, da bi si opomogla od dampinga in sprejemala poslovne odločitve na trdni podlagi.
This has deprived that industry of the necessary predictability in particular for long term decisions.
Zato pri tej industriji ni bilo nujno potrebne predvidljivosti, zlasti za dolgoročne odločitve.
In addition, as explained in recital 127 the Community industry has made restructuring efforts that allowed gaining productivity and compensating for raw material price increases.
Poleg tega si je industrija Skupnosti, kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (127), prizadevala za prestrukturiranje, s čimer je povečala produktivnost in nadomestila zvišanja cen surovin.
This was done with the continued presence of dumped imports and thus shows that that industry is viable and can be profitable, should a level playing field be restored on the Community market.
To ji je uspelo ob stalni prisotnosti dampinškega uvoza, kar dokazuje, da bi bila ta industrija lahko uspešna in dobičkonosna, če bi se na trgu Skupnosti ponovno vzpostavili ustrezni konkurenčni pogoji.
Based on the above analysis, which has properly distinguished and separated the effects of all known factors having an effect on the situation of the Community industry from the injurious effect of the dumped imports, it is provisionally concluded that there is a causal link between the dumped imports and the material injury suffered by the Community industry within the meaning of Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi zgornje analize, ki je ustrezno določila ter ločila učinke vseh znanih dejavnikov, ki so vplivali na položaj industrije Skupnosti, od škodljivega učinka dampinškega uvoza, se začasno sklene, da obstaja vzročna zveza med dampinškim uvozom in znatno škodo, ki jo je industrija Skupnosti utrpela v smislu člena 3(6) osnovne uredbe.
This conclusion is based, on the one hand, on the significant increases in volumes and market shares of the imports concerned, accompanied by a substantial price undercutting, and, on the other the loss of market share and the consequent worsening financial situation.
Ta sklep na eni strani temelji na znatnem povečanju obsega in tržnih deležev zadevnega uvoza skupaj z znatnim nelojalnim nižanjem cen, na drugi pa na izgubi tržnega deleža in posledičnem poslabšanju finančnega stanja.
All these developments coincided in time.
Vse te okoliščine so časovno sovpadle.
None of the other factors examined could have explained the deteriorating situation of the Community industry.
Noben drug proučen dejavnik ne bi mogel pojasniti poslabšanja stanja industrije Skupnosti.
In accordance with Article 21 of the basic Regulation, it was considered whether despite the conclusion of injurious dumping, compelling reasons exist for concluding that it is not in the Community interest to adopt anti-dumping measures in that particular case.
V skladu s členom 21 osnovne uredbe je bilo proučeno, ali kljub sklepu o škodljivem dampingu obstajajo nujni razlogi, zaradi katerih bi bilo mogoče sklepati, da v tem posebnem primeru sprejetje protidampinških ukrepov ni v interesu Skupnosti.
The determination of the Community interest was based on an examination of all the various interests involved, i.e. those of the Community industry, the importers, traders and the users of the product concerned.
Interes Skupnosti je bil določen po proučitvi vseh vpletenih interesov, tj. interesov industrije Skupnosti, uvoznikov, trgovcev in uporabnikov zadevnega izdelka.
In order to assess the likely impact of the imposition or non-imposition of measures information was requested from all interested parties which were either known to be concerned or which made themselves known.
Za oceno možnega vpliva uvedbe ali neuvedbe ukrepov so se zahtevale informacije od vseh zainteresiranih strank, za katere je bilo znano, da jih stvar zadeva, ali pa so bile zainteresirane stranke te informacije pripravljene predložiti same.
On this basis, the Commission sent questionnaires to the Community industry, three unrelated importers, 22 users and three suppliers of raw materials.
Komisija je na podlagi tega poslala vprašalnike industriji Skupnosti, trem nepovezanim uvoznikom, dvaindvajsetim uporabnikom in trem dobaviteljem surovin.
In addition, the Commission contacted also 14 Community producers which did not provide the information requested for the selection of the sample in order to obtain basic information on their production and sales.
Poleg tega je Komisija vzpostavila stik tudi s štirinajstimi proizvajalci Skupnosti, ki niso predložili informacij, zahtevanih za izbiro vzorca, da bi pridobila osnovne informacije o njihovi proizvodnji in prodaji.
As explained in recital 10, the three complainant Community industry producers, one unrelated importer, seven users and one supplier of raw materials replied to the questionnaire.
Kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (10), so vprašalnik izpolnili trije proizvajalci pritožniki industrije Skupnosti, en nepovezan uvoznik, sedem uporabnikov in en dobavitelj surovin.
In addition, six Community producers provided the basic information on their production and sales.
Poleg tega je šest proizvajalcev Skupnosti predložilo osnovne informacije o svoji proizvodnji in prodaji.
In addition, three users associations provided submissions against the measures.
Tri združenja uporabnikov so vložila vloge proti ukrepom.
It is recalled that the Community industry has suffered material injury, as set out in recitals 104 to 108.
Treba je opozoriti, da je industrija Skupnosti utrpela znatno škodo, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah od (104) do (108).
The imposition of measures is expected to prevent a continuing distortion of the market and suppression of prices.
Uvedba ukrepov naj bi onemogočila nadaljnje izkrivljanje trga in preprečevanje dviga cen.
Measures would enable the Community industry to increase its sales and thereby recover lost market share, and benefiting from economies of scale.
Ukrepi bi industriji Skupnosti omogočili, da poveča svojo prodajo in ponovno pridobi izgubljen tržni delež ter izkoristi prednosti, ki jih nudi ekonomija obsega.
Moreover, it is expected that the Community industry could slightly increase their selling prices at a level that would cover costs and allow for a profit.
Nadalje se pričakuje, da bi industrija Skupnosti lahko nekoliko zvišala svoje prodajne cene na raven, ki bi pokrila stroške in omogočila dobiček.
This would likely enable the Community industry to reach the levels of profitability which are necessary in that capital intensive business where continued investments need to be done and to take advantage of developments in the Community market.
To bi industriji Skupnosti omogočilo, da doseže raven dobičkonosnosti, ki je nujna v tej kapitalsko intenzivni panogi, kjer so nenehno potrebne naložbe, ter da izkoristi razvoj na trgu Skupnosti.
This would guarantee the viability of the Community industry's PSF business.
To bi industriji Skupnosti, ki trguje z RVP, zagotovilo sposobnost preživetja.
Otherwise, should anti-dumping measures not be imposed, it is likely that the negative trend of the financial situation of the Community industry will continue.
Verjetno pa bi se v primeru neuvedbe protidampinških ukrepov negativni trend finančnega stanja industrije Skupnosti nadaljeval.
The Community industry is particularly marked by a loss of revenue due to depressed prices, falling market share and significant losses.
Industrija Skupnosti je še zlasti zaznamovana z izgubo prihodka zaradi nizkih cen, nadaljnjega manjšanja tržnega deleža in znatnih izgub.
Indeed, in view of the decreasing revenue and the significantly worsening trend in the IP, it is most likely that the financial situation of the Community industry will deteriorate further in the absence of any measures.
Glede na vedno nižje prihodke in izrazito slabši trend v OP, bi se po vsej verjetnosti njeno finančno stanje brez kakršnih koli ukrepov še bolj poslabšalo.
This would ultimately lead to cuts in production and closures of production sites, which would therefore threaten employment and investments in the Community.
To bi nazadnje povzročilo zmanjšanje proizvodnje in zapiranje proizvodnih enot, kar bi ogrozilo zaposlovanje in naložbe v Skupnosti.
This is particularly true since the European market is now one of the few export markets left to the countries concerned after the imposition of anti-dumping duties on PSF from Taiwan in other third countries such as the United States of America, India and Japan.
To še zlasti velja, ker je evropski trg zdaj eden od redkih izvoznih trgov, ki so še na voljo zadevnim državam po uvedbi protidampinških dajatev za RVP iz Tajvana v drugih tretjih državah, kot so Združene države Amerike, Indija in Japonska.
Accordingly, it is provisionally concluded that the imposition of anti-dumping measures would allow the Community industry to recover from the injurious dumping suffered and would thus be in the interest of the Community industry.
V skladu s tem se začasno sklene, da bi uvedba protidampinških ukrepov industriji Skupnosti omogočila, da si opomore od škodljivega dampinga, ki ga je utrpela, in bi zato bila v njenem interesu.
The other Community producers would also in all likelihood benefit from the imposition of anti-dumping measures.
Tudi drugi proizvajalci Skupnosti bodo imeli po vsej verjetnosti korist od uvedbe protidampinških ukrepov.
Indeed, the other Community producers which did not provide the information requested for the selection of the sample but were subsequently contacted in order to obtain basic information on their production and sales were found in similar situation since their sales volume decreased by 23 % and their sales prices increased also by only 12 %.
Dejansko so se drugi proizvajalci Skupnosti, ki niso predložili informacij, zahtevanih za izbiro vzorca, vendar pa so bili kasneje zaprošeni za osnovne informacije o svoji proizvodnji in prodaji, znašli v podobnem položaju, saj se je obseg njihove prodaje zmanjšal za 23 %, njihove prodajne cene pa so se tudi zvišale le za 12 %.
Impact on importers and users
Vpliv na uvoznike in uporabnike
Only one importer could be considered as cooperating and this importer was against the imposition of measures for the reason that they prevented import of PSF as raw material and could allegedly force the downstream industry to delocalise outside the EU.
Samo en uvoznik se lahko šteje kot sodelujoči uvoznik in ta uvoznik je nasprotoval uvedbi ukrepov, saj bi le-ti preprečili uvoz RVP kot surovine in bi lahko industrijo v nadaljnjem proizvodnem procesu prisilili k selitvi zunaj EU.
However, this importer was not able to provide precise information on the consequence of any measures on its own business or any data regarding the profitability of its sales of the product concerned.
Vendar ta uvoznik ni mogel predložiti natančnih informacij o vplivu katerega koli ukrepa na svoje lastno poslovanje ali kakršnih koli podatkov v zvezi z dobičkonosnostjo svoje prodaje zadevnega izdelka.
Therefore, it has not been possible to assess the likely effect of the proposed anti-dumping measures on the profitability of the co-operating importer.
Zato ni bilo mogoče oceniti verjetnega učinka predlaganih protidampinških ukrepov na dobičkonosnost sodelujočega uvoznika.
It should be recalled that anti-dumping measures are not intended to prevent imports into the Community, but they are ensuring that imports are not made at dumped prices and that operators have access to fairly-priced PSF.
Treba je opozoriti, da namen protidampinških ukrepov ni preprečiti uvoz v Skupnost, ampak zagotoviti, da uvoz ne poteka po dampinških cenah in da imajo gospodarski subjekti dostop do RVP po pošteni ceni.
Imports have always been allowed and will still be allowed to enter into the Community market.
Uvoz na trg Skupnosti je vedno bil in bo dovoljen.
Recent experience has shown that even with anti-dumping measures traditional South Korean exporters have continued to supply Community-based customers.
Nedavne izkušnje so pokazale, da so običajni južnokorejski izvozniki kljub protidampinškim ukrepom še naprej dobavljali strankam s sedežem v Skupnosti.
As explained in recital 159 below anti-dumping measures on certain countries such as India, Australia and Indonesia have expired and there are alternative sources of supply available which are not subject to anti-dumping duties, as for example PSF from Nigeria and Turkey.
Kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (159), so se protidampinški ukrepi, uvedeni za nekatere države, kot so Indija, Avstralija in Indonezija, iztekli, na voljo pa so drugi viri dobave, za katere protidampinške dajatve ne veljajo, kot je na primer RVP iz Nigerije in Turčije.
On this basis, and given the large number of importers not cooperating in the proceeding, it is provisionally concluded that anti-dumping measures will not have such a negative impact on importers as a whole as to outweigh the need to eliminate the trade distorting effects of injurious dumping and to restore effective competition.
Na tej podlagi in glede na veliko število uvoznikov, ki ne sodelujejo v postopku, se začasno sklene, da v celoti gledano protidampinški ukrepi na uvoznike ne bodo imeli tolikšnega negativnega vpliva, da bi prevladal nad potrebo po odpravi učinkov izkrivljanja trgovine, nastalih zaradi škodljivega dampinga, in ponovni vzpostavitvi učinkovite konkurence.
The PSF market is divided into the spinning consumption (i.e. the manufacturing of filaments for the production of textiles, after mixing or not with other fibres such as cotton or wool), the non-woven consumption (i.e. the manufacturing of sheets and webs that have not been converted into yarns and that are bonded to each other by friction, and/or cohesion, and/or adhesion, excluding paper), and the filling consumption (i.e. the stuffing or padding of certain textile goods, as for example cushions or car seats).
Trg RVP je razdeljen na potrošnjo za predenje (tj. izdelava filamentov za proizvodnjo tekstila, po mešanju ali brez mešanja z drugimi vlakni, kot sta bombaž ali volna), netkano potrošnjo (tj. izdelava rjuh in mrež, ki še niso bile predelane v preje in jih veže trenje in/ali kohezija in/ali adhezija, razen papirja) in potrošnjo za zapolnjevanje (tj. polnjenje ali oblazinjenje nekaterih tekstilnih izdelkov, na primer blazin ali avtomobilskih sedežev).
Most of the cooperating users in this proceeding are producers of non-woven products.
Večina uporabnikov, ki sodelujejo v tem postopku, je proizvajalcev netkanih izdelkov.
Said users are members of one of the three users associations cooperating in this proceeding, which represents the non woven industry at a European level.
Omenjeni uporabniki so člani enega od treh združenj uporabnikov, ki sodelujejo v tem postopku; to združenje predstavlja industrijo netkanih izdelkov na evropski ravni.
Further to information on purchases reported in their responses to the questionnaires, cooperating users during the IP represent about 6 % of total Community consumption of PSF and about 7 % of total imports from the countries concerned.
Glede na podatke o nakupih, ki so jih predložili v svojih odgovorih na vprašalnike, sodelujoči uporabniki v času OP predstavljajo približno 6 % skupne potrošnje RVP Skupnosti in približno 7 % skupnega uvoza iz zadevnih držav.
It is noteworthy that imports from the countries concerned represent the minor part of their purchases i.e. 16 %, while imports from other third countries and purchases in the EU still represent respectively 44 % and 40 % of their purchases.
Treba je omeniti, da uvoz iz zadevnih držav predstavlja manjši del njihovih nakupov, tj. 16 %, medtem ko uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav in nakupi v EU še vedno predstavljajo 44 % in 40 % njihovih nakupov.
One of the cooperating users did not even import from the countries concerned between 2002 and the IP.
Eden od sodelujočih uporabnikov med letom 2002 in OP sploh ni uvažal iz zadevnih držav.
Users have indicated a number of arguments against the imposition of duties.
Uporabniki so predložili številne argumente proti uvedbi dajatev.
First, the users claimed that anti-dumping measures could put at risk a downstream industry which employs more than 20000 people, while the Community industry allegedly employs less than 1700 persons.
Najprej, uporabniki so trdili, da bi protidampinški ukrepi lahko ogrozili industrijo na koncu proizvodne verige, v kateri je zaposlenih več kot 20000 ljudi, medtem ko je v industriji Skupnosti po njihovih trditvah zaposlenih manj kot 1700 ljudi.
It has been alleged that the imposition of duties could lead to a loss of jobs in the downstream industry or to moving manufacturing facilities overseas.
Domneva se, da bi uvedba dajatev lahko pomenila izgubo delovnih mest v industriji na koncu proizvodne verige ali selitev proizvodnih obratov v čezmorske države.
They also claimed that the imposition of anti-dumping duties would trigger price increases which users would need to reflect in downstream products.
Prav tako so trdili, da bi uvedba protidampinških dajatev sprožila višanja cen, ki bi jih morali uporabniki odraziti v izdelkih na koncu proizvodne verige.
This development would in turn trigger an increase in imports of lower priced downstream products from other third countries and from the countries concerned by this investigation.
Ta razvoj bi nadalje sprožil povečanje uvoza izdelkov na koncu proizvodne verige po nižjih cenah iz drugih tretjih držav in iz držav, ki jih ta preiskava zadeva.
They finally claimed that the Community industry is unable to fully supply the Community market and that the imposition of the anti-dumping duties would worsen the users' financial situation given that they would have to continue to import from the countries concerned products which are not available within the Community such as the so-called low melt polyester.
Nenazadnje so trdili, da industrija Skupnosti ne more zagotoviti celotne oskrbe trga Skupnosti in da bi uvedba protidampinških dajatev poslabšala finančno stanje uporabnikov, saj bi morali iz zadevnih držav še naprej uvažati izdelke, ki v Skupnosti niso na voljo, kot na primer t. i. poliester z nizkim tališčem.
Regarding the Community market's alleged dependence on external suppliers, it is recalled that by Council Regulation (EC) No 1515/2006 [7] it was decided to repeal the existing measures on imports from Australia, Indonesia, Thailand and India.
V zvezi z domnevno odvisnostjo trga Skupnosti od zunanjih dobaviteljev je treba opozoriti, da Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1515/2006 [7] vsebuje odločitev o preklicu obstoječih ukrepov za uvoz iz Avstralije, Indonezije, Tajske in Indije.
While the anti-dumping measure imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1522/2000 [8] and Council Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000 [9] almost stopped imports from those countries, it is noteworthy that before the imposition of anti-dumping measures on their imports of PSF in the Community market, Australia, Indonesia and Thailand held a market share of 8,9 % and India a market share of 2,9 %.
Medtem ko je protidampinški ukrep, uveden z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1522/2000 [8] in Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2852/2000 [9] skoraj prekinil uvoz iz omenjenih držav, je treba opomniti, da so imele Avstralija, Indonezija in Tajska pred uvedbo protidampinških ukrepov na svoj uvoz RVP na trg Skupnosti tržni delež v višini 8,9 %, Indija pa tržni delež v višini 2,9 %.
It is therefore likely that, once anti-dumping measures are removed, imports from these third countries will resume and be reoriented towards the Community market.
Zato je verjetno, da se bo po odpravi protidampinških ukrepov uvoz iz teh tretjih držav spet nadaljeval in se preusmeril na trg Skupnosti.
In addition, imports from other third countries already hold an important share of the Community market, reaching 11 % in the IP.
Poleg tega uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav že zdaj predstavlja pomemben delež trga Skupnosti, saj je v času OP dosegel 11 %.
Therefore, in spite of the proposed introduction of duties against Taiwan and Malaysia, and taking into account the termination of the measures against Australia, Indonesia, Thailand and India, the Community users which already during the IP purchased 84 % of their needs outside the countries concerned, would still be able to rely on (or to switch to) important suppliers of the product concerned in the Community or on other major providers located in countries not subject to antidumping duties, should it be for specific product such as low melt polyester (‘LMF’).
Torej bi se uporabniki Skupnosti, ki so že v OP kupovali 84 % potrebnih surovin zunaj zadevnih držav, kljub predlagani uvedbi dajatev proti Tajvanu in Maleziji in ob upoštevanju ukinitve ukrepov proti Avstraliji, Indoneziji, Tajski in Indiji še vedno lahko zanašali na pomembne dobavitelje (ali od njih začeli kupovati) zadevnega izdelka v Skupnosti ali na druge velike dobavitelje iz držav, za katere protidampinške dajatve ne veljajo, če bi potrebovali poseben izdelek, kot je poliester z nizkim tališčem.
This is also confirmed by one of the users which stated that the so called LMF can be supplied by Korea or Japan and that two European producers also produce it.
To je potrdil tudi eden od uporabnikov, ki je navedel, da t. i. poliester z nizkim tališčem lahko dobavljata Koreja ali Japonska ter da ga proizvajata tudi dva evropska proizvajalca.
It shows that at least two European producers have technology and know how to produce such a specific product and that it cannot be excluded that once prices reach a level at which the effects of injurious dumping are removed, production and supply will increase within the Community.
To pomeni, da imata vsaj dva evropska proizvajalca tehnologijo in znanje za proizvodnjo takšnega posebnega izdelka ter da ni mogoče izključiti, da se bosta proizvodnja in dobava v Skupnosti povečali, ko bodo cene dosegle raven, na kateri so učinki škodljivega dampinga odstranjeni.
In addition although certain types of PSF were not produced by the Community industry during certain periods, this does not mean that the Community industry would not be in a position to produce those types.
Treba je dodati, da čeprav nekaterih vrst poliestra z nizkim tališčem ni proizvedla industrija Skupnosti, to ne pomeni, da jih ne bi zmogla proizvesti.
Indeed, depending on the product type, only small adaptations of the production process, requiring low investment, would be needed.
Dejansko bi bile potrebne le majhne prilagoditve v proizvodnem postopku z nizkimi naložbami, odvisno od vrste izdelka.
Rather, at particular moments in time, certain PSF types were not available because the Community producers could not deliver the quantities involved at the depressed price levels which users were willing to pay.
Nekateri RVP občasno ni bil na voljo predvsem zato, ker proizvajalci Skupnosti niso mogli dobaviti potrebnih količin po znižanih cenah, ki so jih bili uporabniki pripravljeni plačati.