natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to ensure consistency with Commission Regulation (EC) No 208/2007 [3], which adapts Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 following the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union, this Regulation should apply from 1 January 2007.
Za zagotovitev skladnosti z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 208/2007 [3], ki prilagaja Uredbo (EGS) št. 3149/92 po pristopu Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji, je treba to uredbo uporabljati od 1. januarja 2007.
Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 should therefore be amended.
Uredbo (EGS) št. 3149/92 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The third subparagraph of Article 7(5) is replaced by the following:
V členu 7(5) se tretji pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Dispatch declarations issued by the supplier intervention agency shall include one of the entries given in the Annex.’
„Odpremne deklaracije, ki jih izda intervencijska agencija dobaviteljica, vsebujejo eno od naslednjih navedb iz Priloge.“
The text given in the Annex hereto is added as an Annex.
Besedilo iz Priloge k tej uredbi se doda kot Priloga.
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 208/2007 of 27 February 2007 adapting Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 laying down detailed rules for the supply of food from intervention stocks for the benefit of the most deprived persons in the Community, by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union
Popravek Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 208/2007 z dne 27. februarja 2007 o prilagoditvi Uredbe (EGS) št. 3149/92 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za dobavo hrane iz intervencijskih zalog v korist najbolj ogroženih oseb v Skupnosti zaradi pristopa Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji
(Official Journal of the European Union L 61 of 28 February 2007)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 61 z dne 28. februarja 2007)
The publication of this Regulation in the abovementioned Official Journal is annulled.
Objava Uredbe v zgoraj navedenem Uradnem listu se razveljavi.
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 209/2007 of 27 February 2007 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 laying down detailed rules for the supply of food from intervention stocks for the benefit of the most deprived persons in the Community
Popravek Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 209/2007 z dne 27. februarja 2007 o spremembi Uredbe (EGS) št. 3149/92 o podrobnih pravilih za dobavo hrane iz intervencijskih zalog v korist najbolj ogroženih oseb v Skupnosti
Commission Regulation (EC) No 210/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 210/2007
derogating from Regulation (EC) No 1282/2006 as regards the term of validity of export licences with advance fixing of the refund in the milk and milk products sector
o odstopanju od Uredbe (ES) št. 1282/2006 glede roka veljavnosti izvoznih dovoljenj z vnaprejšnjo določitvijo nadomestila za sektor mleka in mlečnih izdelkov
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products [1], and in particular Article 31(14) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1255/1999 z dne 17. maja 1999 o skupni organizaciji trga mleka in mlečnih izdelkov [1] ter zlasti člena 31(14) Uredbe,
Article 8 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1282/2006 of 17 August 2006 laying down special detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards export licences and export refunds for milk and milk products [2] lays down the terms of validity of export licences.
Člen 8 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1282/2006 z dne 17. avgusta 2006 o posebnih podrobnih pravilih za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1255/1999 glede izvoznih dovoljenj in izvoznih nadomestil za mleko in mlečne izdelke [2] določa roke veljavnosti izvoznih dovoljenj.
The reduction of the intervention price for butter as from 1 July 2007 is likely to affect the difference between that price and the world market price.
Znižanje intervencijskih cen za maslo od 1. julija 2007 bo verjetno vplivalo na razliko med to ceno in cenami na svetovnem trgu.
As a precautionary measure, with a view to protect the Community budget from unnecessary expenditures and to avoid a speculative application of the export refund regime in the dairy sector, for products containing milk fat, the validity of export licences with advance fixing of the refund should be limited until 30 June 2007.
Veljavnost izvoznih dovoljenj z vnaprejšnjo določitvijo nadomestila je treba omejiti na 30. junij 2007, da se kot previdnostni ukrep proračun Skupnosti zaščiti pred nepotrebnimi izdatki in prepreči špekulativna uporaba režima izvoznih nadomestil v sektorju mleka in mlečnih izdelkov glede izdelkov, ki vsebujejo mlečno maščobo.
By way of derogation from Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1282/2006, export licences with advance fixing of the refund in respect of the products referred to in points (b) to (d) of that Article for which the applications are submitted as from 1 March shall be valid until 30 June 2007.
Z odstopanjem od člena 8 Uredbe (ES) št. 1282/2006 so izvozna dovoljenja z vnaprejšnjo določitvijo nadomestila za proizvode iz točk (b) do (d) navedenega člena, za katera so zahtevki vloženi od 1. marca, veljavna do 30. junija 2007.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1919/2006 (OJ L 380, 28.12.2006, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1919/2006 (UL L 380, 28.12.2006, str. 1).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 211/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 211/2007
amending Regulation (EC) No 809/2004 implementing Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards financial information in prospectuses where the issuer has a complex financial history or has made a significant financial commitment
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 809/2004 o izvajanju Direktive 2003/71/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede finančnih informacij v prospektih, če ima izdajatelj zapleteno finančno preteklost ali je sprejel veliko finančno obveznost
Having regard to Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading and amending Directive 2001/34/EC [1], and in particular Article 5(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2003/71/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. novembra 2003 o prospektu, ki se objavi ob javni ponudbi ali sprejemu vrednostnih papirjev v trgovanje, in o spremembi Direktive 2001/34/ES [1] in zlasti člena 5(5) Direktive,
Commission Regulation (EC) No 809/2004 of 29 April 2004 implementing Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards information contained in prospectuses as well as the format, incorporation by reference and publication of such prospectuses and dissemination of advertisements [2] sets out in detail the information which must be included in a prospectus, for different kinds of securities, in order to comply with Article 5(1) of that Directive.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 809/2004 z dne 29. aprila 2004 o izvajanju Direktive 2003/71/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o informacijah, ki jih vsebujejo prospekti, in o obliki prospektov, vključitvi informacij s sklicevanjem in objavi teh prospektov in razširjanju oglaševanj [2] podrobno določa informacije za različne vrste vrednostnih papirjev, ki jih mora vsebovati prospekt, da je skladen s členom (5)1 navedene direktive.
Those detailed information requirements cover, among other things, the financial information concerning the issuer which must be included in a prospectus in order to enable investors to understand the financial position of the issuer.
Navedene podrobne informacije med drugim zajemajo finančne informacije glede izdajatelja, ki jih mora vsebovati prospekt, da se vlagateljem omogoči razumevanje finančnega položaja izdajatelja.
However, there are cases where the financial position of the issuer is so closely linked with that of other entities that financial information concerning those entities is indispensable for the purposes of giving full effect to Article 5(1) of Directive 2003/71/EC, that is to say, for complying with the obligation to include in the prospectus all the information necessary to enable the investor to make an informed assessment of the issuer’s financial position and prospects.
Vendar obstajajo primeri, ko je finančni položaj izdajatelja tako tesno povezan s položajem entitet, da so finančne informacije navedenih entitet nujno potrebne za namene polnega izvajanja člena 5(1) Direktive 2003/71/ES, torej za skladnost z obvezo, da se v prospekt vključijo vse informacije, ki jih potrebuje vlagatelj, da oceni izdajateljev finančni položaj in obete.
Such cases may arise where the issuer has a complex financial history and those where the issuer has made a significant financial commitment.
Takšni primeri se lahko pojavijo, če ima izdajatelj zapleteno finančno preteklost ali je sprejel veliko finančno obveznost.
In order to ensure, therefore, that Article 5(1) of Directive 2003/71/EC is not deprived of useful effect in those cases and to introduce a greater measure of legal certainty in this regard, it should be made clear that the information requirements laid down in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 809/2004 are to be construed in that context as relating also to financial information concerning entities other than the issuer, where the omission of that information could prevent an investor from making an informed assessment of the issuer’s financial position.
Da se torej zagotovi, da ima člen 5(1) Direktive 2003/71/ES v navedenih primerih uporabni učinek in da se s tem v zvezi uvede večja mera pravne gotovosti, je treba zagotoviti, da se zahteve v zvezi z informacijami iz Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 809/2004 v navedem kontekstu tolmačijo tako, da se nanašajo tudi na finančne informacije glede entitet, ki niso izdajatelji, če bi lahko izpustitev navedenih informacij vlagatelju preprečila utemeljeno oceno izdajateljevega finančnega položaja.
In view of the fact that, under Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 809/2004, the competent authorities may not request the inclusion of information for which no express provision is made in the Annexes, it is necessary to clarify the responsibilities of the competent authorities in this context.
Ker v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 809/2004 pristojni organi ne smejo zahtevati vključitve informacij, ki niso izrecno določene v prilogah, je treba razjasniti odgovornosti pristojnih organov v tem kontekstu.
Where an issuer has a complex financial history, the entire business undertaking of the issuer may not be covered by historical financial information relating to the issuer, but will be covered instead by financial information drawn up by another entity.
Če ima izdajatelj zapleteno finančno preteklost, pretekle finančne informacije v zvezi z izdajateljem ne morejo zajeti celotnega poslovanja izdajatelja, ki ga namesto tega krijejo informacije, ki jih pripravi druga entiteta.
This is likely to be the case where the issuer has made a significant acquisition not yet reflected in its own financial statements; where the issuer is a newly incorporated holding company; where the issuer is composed of companies that were under common control or ownership but which never formed a legal group; or where the issuer has been formed as a separate legal entity following the division of an existing business).
To se ponavadi zgodi, če je izdajatelj izvedel velik nakup, ki se še ne odraža v njegovem lastnem izkazu stanja; če je izdajatelj na novo vključeni holding; če je izdajatelj sestavljen iz podjetij, ki so imela skupni nadzor ali lastništvo, vendar niso bila nikoli pravna skupina; ali če je bil izdajatelj ustanovljen kot ločena pravna entiteta po ločitvi obstoječega podjetja.
In such cases, all or part of the business undertaking of the issuer will have been carried on by another entity during the period for which the issuer is required to provide historical financial information.
V takih primerih celoto ali del poslovne dejavnosti izdajatelja v obdobju, za katerega mora izdajatelj predložiti pretekle finančne informacije, izvaja druga entiteta.
However, it is not currently possible to provide a comprehensive list of cases that should be treated as issuers with a complex financial history.
Vendar pa trenutno ni mogoče oblikovati popolnega seznama primerov, ki jih je treba obravnavati kot primere z izdajateljem z zapleteno finančno preteklostjo.
It is likely that new and innovative forms of transaction might be developed that would fall outside the cases specified in any such list.
Verjetno je, da se razvijajo nove in inovativne oblike transakcij, ki ne spadajo med primere, opredeljene v katerem koli takšnem seznamu.
It is therefore appropriate to provide a broad definition of the circumstances in which an issuer should be treated as having a complex financial history.
Zato je primerno, da se določi široka opredelitev okoliščin, v katerih se izdajatelj obravnava kot izdajatelj z zapleteno finančno preteklostjo.
An issuer should be treated as having made a significant financial commitment where it has entered into a binding agreement to acquire or dispose of a significant entity or business, which is not yet completed at the date of the approval of the prospectus.
Da je izdajatelj sprejel veliko finančno obveznost se šteje, če je vstopil v obvezujoč dogovor za nakup ali prodajo velike entitete ali podjetja, ki na dan odobritve prospekta še ni zaključen.
It is appropriate that such cases should be subject to the same information requirements as apply where the issuer has already completed an acquisition or disposal, provided that the agreed transaction, on completion, would give rise to a significant gross change in the assets and liabilities and earnings of the issuer.
Primerno je, da za take primere veljajo enake zahteve za informacije kot se uporabljajo, če je izdajatelj že izvedel nakup ali prodajo, pod pogojem, da sklenjena transakcija ob izvedbi povzroči znatno spremembo bruto sredstev in obveznosti ter dobička izdajatelja.
Since cases where the issuer has a complex financial history or has made a significant financial commitment are atypical, and indeed may be unique, it is not possible to specify the information needed to fulfil the standard specified by Directive 2003/71/EC for every conceivable case.
Ker so primeri, ko ima izdajatelj zapleteno finančno preteklost ali je sprejel znatno finančno obveznost, redki, in so lahko dejansko enkratni, ni mogoče podrobno določiti informacij, ki so potrebne za zadostitev standardu iz Direktive 2003/71/ES za vsak možen primer.
Accordingly, the supplementary information to be required should be whatever is necessary, in each particular case, to ensure that the prospectus satisfies the obligation laid down in Article 5(1) of Directive 2003/71/EC.
Zato morajo dodatne zahtevane informacije obsegati vse, kar je v posameznem primeru potrebno, da se zagotovi skladnost prospekta z obvezo iz člena 5(1) Direktive 2003/71/ES.
It is therefore appropriate that the competent authority of the issuer should determine on a case by case basis the information required (if any).
Zato je primerno, da pristojni organ izdajatelja (če obstaja potreba) določi zahtevane informacije za vsak primer posebej.
The fact that a competent authority may request such additional information should not require the competent authority to apply a higher standard of scrutiny to that information, or to the prospectus in general, than that which may be derived from Article 13 of Directive 2003/71/EC.
Dejstvo, da lahko pristojni organ zahteva takšne dodatne informacije, ne sme zahtevati, da pristojni organ uporabi višji standard pregledov teh informacij ali prospektov na splošno, kot je standard iz člena 13 Direktive 2003/71/ES.
Given the complexity of circumstances of each specific case, it would be neither practicable nor efficient to specify detailed rules to be applied by competent authorities uniformly to all cases.
Zaradi zapletenosti okoliščin vsakega posameznega primera ne bi bilo ne praktično ne učinkovito podrobno določati pravil, ki bi jih pristojni organi uporabljali enotno za vse primere.
It is necessary to provide for a flexible approach so as to ensure, on the one hand, that disclosure requirements are effective and proportionate and, on the other hand, that the investor is adequately protected through the provision of sufficient and appropriate information.
Treba je določiti prožen pristop, da se zagotovi učinkovitost in primernost zahtev za razkritje informacij na eni strani ter s predložitvijo zadostnih in primernih informacij primerna zaščita vlagatelja na drugi strani.
Supplementary financial information should not be requested in cases where the financial information provided in the audited consolidated financial statements of the issuer itself, in any pro forma information, or in any financial information prepared using merger accounting (where permitted by the applicable accounting standards) is likely to be sufficient to enable investors to make an informed assessment of the assets and liabilities, financial position, profit and losses, and prospects of the issuer and of any guarantor, and of the rights attaching to such securities.
Dodatne finančne informacije se ne zahtevajo v primerih, ko so finančne informacije iz revidiranih zbirnih finančnih izkazov izdajatelja samega, katere koli formalne informacije ali katere koli finančne informacije, pripravljene z uporabo računovodstva združitve (če je dovoljeno, z zadevnimi računovodskimi standardi), dovolj, da se vlagatelju zagotovi ocena sredstev in obveznosti, finančnega položaja, dobička in izgub ter obetov izdajatelja in katerega koli garanta, ter pravic, ki izhajajo iz takšnih vrednostnih papirjev.
It is appropriate, given the fact that the need for further information can arise only where the prospectus concerns shares or other securities giving rights to shares, that, when determining whether such a need has arisen in the individual case, the competent authorities should base their examination on the requirements laid down in item 20.1 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 809/2004 as regards the content of financial information and the applicable accounting and auditing principles.
Ker se lahko potreba po nadaljnjih informacijah pojavi le, če se prospekt nanaša na delnice ali druge vrednostne papirje, iz katerih izhaja pravica do delnic, je primerno, da pristojni organi pri določanju dejanske take potrebe v posameznem primeru utemeljijo svojo presojo na zahtevah iz točke 20.1 Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 809/2004 glede vsebine finančnih informacij in računovodskih ter revizijskih načel, ki se uporabljajo.
A competent authority should not impose requirements that go beyond those laid down in item 20.1 of Annex I, or make them more onerous.
Pristojni organ ne sme naložiti zahtev, ki presegajo zahteve točke 20.1 Priloge I, ali jih zaostriti.
However, it should be possible to adjust their application of those requirements in the light of characteristics of the individual case relating to the precise nature of the securities, the economic substance of the transactions by which the issuer has acquired its business undertaking, the specific nature of that undertaking, and the range of information that is already included in the prospectus.
Vendar mora biti mogoče prilagoditi uporabo navedenih zahtev glede na značilnosti posameznega primera v zvezi s posebno naravo vrednostnih papirjev, ekonomsko vsebino transakcij, s katerimi je izdajatelj pridobil svoje podjetje, posebno naravo navedenega podjetja, ter vrsto informacij, ki so že vključene v prospektu.
When making that determination, competent authorities should have regard to the principle of proportionality.
Pri sprejemanju navedene odločitve morajo pristojni organi upoštevati načelo proporcionalnosti.
In cases where there are alternative ways of satisfying the obligation laid down in Article 5(1) of Directive 2003/71/EC through the disclosure of different kinds of supplementary financial information, or the presentation of that information in different formats, the competent authority should not require the issuer to satisfy that obligation in a way that is more costly or onerous than an adequate alternative.
V primerih, ko obstajajo alternativni načini za izpolnitev obveznosti iz člena 5(1) Direktive 2003/71/ES z razkritjem različnih vrst dodatnih finančnih informacij ali predložitvijo navedenih informacij v različnih oblikah, pristojni organ ne sme zahtevati, da izdajatelj izpolni navedeno obvezo na način, ki je dražji ali težavnejši kot ustrezna alternativa.
Furthermore, competent authorities should have regard to whether an issuer has access to financial information relating to another entity: it would not be proportionate to require the inclusion of such information where the issuer cannot obtain that information with reasonable effort.
Nadalje morajo pristojni organi upoštevati, ali ima izdajatelj dostop do finančnih informacij v zvezi z drugo entiteto ali ne: ne bi bilo primerno zahtevati vključitve takih informacij, če izdajatelj navedenih informacij kljub prizadevanjem ne more pridobiti.
This consideration is likely to be relevant, in particular, in the context of a hostile takeover.
Zgoraj navedeno je verjetno zlasti v primeru sovražnega prevzema.
Similarly, it may not be proportionate to require the inclusion of financial information which does not exist at the time when the prospectus is drawn up, or to require the auditing or restatement of supplementary financial information if the costs to the issuer of complying with that requirement outweigh any potential benefit to the investor.
Prav tako ni primerno, da se zahteva vključitev finančnih informacij, ki v času oblikovanja prospekta ne obstajajo, ali zahtevati revizijo ali prenovljeni prikaz finančnih informacij, če so stroški izpolnjevanja navedene zahteve v breme izdajatelja večji kot kakršna koli možna korist v prid vlagatelja.
Regulation (EC) No 809/2004 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 809/2004 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) has been consulted for technical advice,
Za namene tehničnih nasvetov so potekala posvetovanja z Odborom evropskih organov za urejanje vrednostnih papirjev (CESR) –
Regulation (EC) No 809/2004 is amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 809/2004 se spremeni:
In the second paragraph of Article 3, the second sentence is replaced by the following:
V členu 3 se drugi stavek drugega odstavka nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
‘Subject to Article 4a(1), a competent authority shall not request that a prospectus contain information items which are not included in Annexes I to XVII.’
„V skladu s členom 4a(1) pristojni organi ne zahtevajo, da prospekt vsebuje informacije, ki niso vključene v priloge I do XVII.“
Share registration document schedule in cases of complex financial history or significant financial commitment
Seznam registracijskega dokumenta za delnice v primerih zapletene finančne preteklosti ali znatne finančne obveznosti
Where the issuer of a security covered by Article 4(2) has a complex financial history, or has made a significant financial commitment, and in consequence the inclusion in the registration document of certain items of financial information relating to an entity other than the issuer is necessary in order to satisfy the obligation laid down in Article 5(1) of Directive 2003/71/EC, those items of financial information shall be deemed to relate to the issuer.
Če ima izdajatelj vrednostnega papirja iz člena 4(2) zapleteno finančno preteklost ali je sprejel znatno finančno obveznost ter je posledično za izpolnitev obveznosti iz člena 5(1) Direktive 2003/71/ES v dokument za registracijo nujno treba vključiti določene elemente finančnih informacij v zvezi z entiteto, ki ni izdajatelj, se šteje, da se navedene finančne informacije nanašajo na izdajatelja.
The competent authority of the home Member State shall in such cases request that the issuer, the offeror or the person asking for admission to trading include those items of information in the registration document.
Pristojni organ matične države članice v takih primerih zahteva, da izdajatelj, ponudnik ali oseba, ki prosi za dovoljenje za trgovanje, vključi navedene informacije v registracijski dokument.