natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In view of the extremely good utilisation of the current fisheries Agreement, the Seychelles authorities’ wish to strengthen the partnership and the Community authorities’ desire to bring this Protocol into line with other tuna protocols, the two Parties have initialled amendments to the existing Protocol in the form of an Exchange of Letters.
Ob upoštevanju zelo dobre uporabe sedanjega ribiškega sporazuma in zaradi želje sejšelskih oblasti, da okrepijo partnerstvo, in organov Skupnosti, da uskladijo ta protokol z drugimi protokoli o ribolovu tunov, sta pogodbenici parafirali spremembe sedanjega protokola v obliki izmenjave pisem.
The outcome of these amendments has been the subject of an Exchange of Letters and involves an increase in the reference tonnage, the introduction of financial support for the partnership and adjustment of the ratio between the shares paid by shipowners and the Community budget.
Rezultati teh sprememb so bili predmet izmenjave pisem in se nanašajo na povečanje referenčne tonaže, uvajajo finančno podporo za partnerstvo in spreminjajo razmerje med deležem, ki ga plačajo lastniki plovil, in deležem, ki gre iz proračuna Skupnosti.
In order for these amendments to the current Protocol to apply from 18 January 2008, the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters should be signed, subject to its definitive conclusion by the Council.
Da bi se te spremembe sedanjega protokola začele uporabljati od 18. januarja 2008, je treba podpisati Sporazum v obliki izmenjave pisem, pod pogojem da ga Svet dokončno sklene.
These amendments do not alter the allocation of fishing opportunities among the Member States,
S temi spremembami se ključ razdelitve ribolovnih možnosti med države članice ne spreminja –
The signature of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters on the amendments to the Protocol setting out, for the period from 18 January 2005 to 17 January 2011, the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Seychelles on fishing off Seychelles is hereby approved by the Council on behalf of the Community.
Svet v imenu Skupnosti odobri podpis Sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem glede sprememb Protokola o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti in finančnega prispevka, predvidenih s Sporazumom med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Republiko Sejšeli o ribolovu v obalnih vodah Sejšelov, za obdobje od 18. januarja 2005 do 17. januarja 2011.
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters on behalf of the Community subject to its conclusion.
Predsednik Sveta je pooblaščen, da imenuje osebo(-e), pooblaščeno(-e) za podpis Sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem v imenu Skupnosti, s pridržkom njegove sklenitve.
The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters shall be applied provisionally by the Community from 18 January 2008.
Skupnost začasno uporablja Sporazum v obliki izmenjave pisem od 18. januarja 2008.
The fishing opportunities set out in the Protocol and laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 115/2006 on 23 January 2006 shall not be amended and are confirmed as follows:
Ribolovne možnosti, določene s Protokolom in Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 115/2006 z dne 23. januarja 2006 se ne spreminjajo in se potrdijo po naslednjem ključu:
Types of fishing
Ribolovna kategorija
Tuna seiners
Plovila za ribolov tunov s potegalko
17 vessels
17 plovil
22 vessels
22 plovil
Surface longliners
Plovila za ribolov s površinskim parangalom
2 vessels
2 plovili
5 vessels
5 plovil
If licence applications from those Member States do not cover all the fishing opportunities laid down by the Protocol, the Commission may take into consideration licence applications from any other Member State.
Če zahtevki za dovoljenja držav članic ne zajemajo vseh ribolovnih možnosti, ki jih določa Protokol, lahko Komisija upošteva zahtevke za dovoljenja katere koli druge države članice.
OJ L 21, 25.1.2006, p. 1.
UL L 21, 25.1.2006, str. 1.
in the form of an Exchange of Letters on the provisional application of the amendments to the Protocol setting out, for the period from 18 January 2005 to 17 January 2011, the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Seychelles on fishing off Seychelles
v obliki izmenjave pisem v zvezi z začasno uporabo sprememb protokola o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti in finančnega prispevka, predvidenih s Sporazumom med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Republiko Sejšeli o ribolovu v obalnih vodah Sejšelov, za obdobje od 18. januarja 2005 do 17. januarja 2011
Letter from the Government of the Republic of Seychelles
Pismo Vlade Republike Sejšeli:
I am delighted that the Republic of Seychelles and European Community negotiators have been able to reach a consensus on amendments to the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution and its Annexes.
veseli me, da so pogajalci Republike Sejšeli in Evropske skupnosti našli soglasje glede sprememb Protokola o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti in finančnem prispevku ter njegovih prilog.
The negotiations held in Brussels on 20-21 March 2007 have enabled adjustments to be made to the fishing opportunities provided for in the Protocol setting out, for the period from 18 January 2005 to 17 January 2011, the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Seychelles on fishing off Seychelles.
Rezultat teh pogajanj, ki so bila od 20. do 21. marca 2007 v Bruslju, je omogočil ponoven pregled ribolovnih možnosti iz Protokola o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti in finančnega prispevka, predvidenih s Sporazumom med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Republiko Sejšeli o ribolovu v obalnih vodah Sejšelov, za obdobje od 18. januarja 2005 do 17. januarja 2011.
The amendments made to this Protocol are annexed hereto.
Spremembe Protokola so priložene v Prilogi.
The amended Protocol having been initialled by the two Parties on 21 March 2007, I would propose continuing in parallel the procedures for approval and/or ratification of the texts of the amended Protocol and its Annex and Appendices in accordance with the procedures in force in the Republic of Seychelles and in the European Community and necessary for their entry into force.
Ker sta pogodbenici revidirali in parafirali Protokol 21. marca 2007, predlagam, da se vzporedno nadaljuje s postopki odobritve in/ali ratifikacije besedil tako spremenjenega Protokola in njegove priloge ter dodatkov v skladu z veljavnimi postopki v Republiki Sejšeli in Evropski skupnosti, ki so potrebni za začetek veljavnosti.
In order to avoid interrupting fishing activities by Community vessels in Seychelles waters, and referring to the Protocol amended on 21 March 2007 and setting out, for the period from 18 January 2008 to 17 January 2011, the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution, I have the honour to inform you that the Government of the Republic of Seychelles is willing to apply this amended Protocol provisionally from 18 January 2008 pending its entry into force in accordance with Article 13 of the Protocol, provided that the European Community is prepared to do likewise.
V čast mi je, da vas lahko v zvezi s Protokolom, revidiranim 21. marca 2007, ki za obdobje od 18. januarja 2008 do 17. januarja 2011 določa ribolovne možnosti in finančni prispevek, in da se ne prekinejo ribolovne dejavnosti plovil Skupnosti v sejšelskih vodah, obvestim, da je Vlada Republike Sejšeli pripravljena začasno uporabljati revidirani protokol od 18. januarja 2008 do začetka njegove veljavnosti v skladu s členom 13 Protokola, če je Evropska skupnost pripravljena storiti enako.
This is on the understanding that the amended financial contribution laid down by Article 2 of the amended Protocol shall be paid when the two Parties notify each other that they have completed the procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Protocol and its amended Annexes.
Ob tem se razume, da je treba v tem primeru plačilo revidiranega finančnega prispevka iz člena 2 revidiranega Protokola opraviti, ko se pogodbenici obvestita o zaključku postopkov, potrebnih za začetek veljavnosti Protokola in revidiranih prilog k Protokolu.
For the Government of the Republic of Seychelles
Za Vlado Republike Sejšeli
I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today’s date which reads as follows:
v čast mi je potrditi prejem vašega pisma z današnjim datumom, v katerem je zapisano:
‘I am delighted that the Republic of Seychelles and European Community negotiators have been able to reach a consensus on amendments to the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution and its Annexes.
„Spoštovani, veseli me, da so pogajalci Republike Sejšeli in Evropske skupnosti našli soglasje glede sprememb Protokola o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti in finančnem prispevku ter njegovih prilog.
I should be grateful if you would confirm the agreement of the European Community to such a provisional application.’
Hvaležen vam bom za potrditev, da se Evropska skupnost strinja glede takšne začasne uporabe.“
I am pleased to confirm the agreement of the European Community to a provisional application.
V čast mi je potrditi, da se Evropska skupnost strinja s takšno začasno uporabo.
For the Community
Za Svet Evropske unije
I should be grateful if you would confirm the agreement of the European Community to such a provisional application.
Hvaležen vam bom za potrditev, da se Evropska skupnost strinja glede takšne začasne uporabe.
appointing a Spanish member and two Spanish alternate members to the Committee of the Regions
o imenovanju španskega člana in dveh španskih nadomestnih članov Odbora regij
A seat as a member of the Committee of the Regions has fallen vacant following the end of the mandate of Mr GALLEGO CUESTA.
Eno mesto člana se je sprostilo po izteku mandata GALLEGA CUESTE.
Two seats as alternate members have fallen vacant following the end of the mandates of Mr MARTÍN MALLÉN and Mr SUÁREZ RODRÍGUEZ,
Dve mesti nadomestnih članov Odbora regij sta se izpraznili zaradi poteka mandatov MARTÍN MALLÉNA in SUÁREZ RODRÍGUEZA –
The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which ends on 25 January 2010:
V Odbor regij se za preostanek mandata, tj. do 25. januarja 2010, imenujejo:
Done at Brussels, 18 February 2008.
V Bruslju, 18. februarja 2008
State aid C 37/2006 (ex NN 91/2005) — Fishing Vessel Modernisation Scheme implemented in the United Kingdom
Državna pomoč C 37/2006 (ex NN 91/2005) – Shema za posodobitev ribiških plovil, ki se uporablja v Združenem kraljestvu
(notified under document number C(2007) 5395)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 5395)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [1], and in particular Article 6(1) Article 14 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES [1] ter zlasti člena 6(1) in člena 14 Uredbe,
Having called on interested third parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [2],
ob pozivu zainteresiranim tretjim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z zgoraj navedenimi določbami [2],
By letter dated 15 June 2004, the Commission was informed by a citizen of the United Kingdom that the Shetland Islands Council, the public authority in the Shetland Islands of the United Kingdom had implemented aid to the fisheries sector, which possibly concerned illegal state aid.
Z dopisom z dne 15. junija 2004 je Komisija prejela obvestilo državljana Združenega kraljestva, da je Svet Shetlandskih otokov, javni organ Shetlandskih otokov Združenega kraljestva, dodelil pomoč ribiškemu sektorju, ki je domnevno pomenila nezakonito državno pomoč.
By letters dated 24 August 2004, 4 February 2005, 11 May 2005 and 16 December 2005, the Commission requested the United Kingdom to provide information about such aid.
Z dopisi z dne 24. avgusta 2004, 4. februarja 2005, 11. maja 2005 in 16. decembra 2005 je Komisija zahtevala, da Združeno kraljestvo predloži informacije o takšni pomoči.
By letters dated 10 December 2004, 6 April 2005, 8 September 2005 and 31 January 2006, the United Kingdom provided the Commission with further information.
Z dopisi z dne 10. decembra 2004, 6. aprila 2005, 8. septembra 2005 in 31. januarja 2006 je Združeno kraljestvo Komisiji predložilo dodatne informacije.
By letter dated 13 September 2006, the Commission informed the United Kingdom that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid.
Z dopisom z dne 13. septembra 2006 je Komisija obvestila Združeno kraljestvo, da bo glede pomoči sprožila postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES v zvezi s pomočjo.
The United Kingdom provided its comments on the aid by letters dated 16 October 2006 and 6 February 2007.
Združeno kraljestvo je svoje pripombe glede pomoči predložilo z dopisi z dne 16. oktobra 2006 in 6. februarja 2007.
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3].
Odločitev Komisije, da sproži postopek, je bil objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3].
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the aid.
Komisija je zainteresirane stranke povabila, da predložijo svoje pripombe o pomoči.
The Shetland Islands Council made payments to the fisheries sector under the scope of two general aid measures, named ‘Aid to the Fish Catching and Processing Industry’ and ‘Aid to the Fish Farming Industry’, which actually consisted of several different types of aid schemes in force since the 1970's.
Svet Shetlandskih otokov je izvršil plačila ribiškemu sektorju na podlagi dveh splošnih ukrepov pomoči, imenovanih „Pomoč za ribištvo in ribiško predelovalno industrijo“ in „Pomoč za ribogojno industrijo“, ki jih je dejansko sestavljalo več različnih vrst shem pomoči, veljavnih od sedemdesetih let 20. stoletja.
One such scheme was the ‘Fishing Vessel Modernisation Scheme’ (‘the scheme’).
Ena od takšnih shem je bila shema za posodobitev ribiških plovil („shema“).
Under the scheme, which applied from at least the 1980's until 14 January 2005, aid could be granted for the modernisation of fishing vessels, related to a major improvement, such as, for example, better storage of catches, replacement of the engine, improvements in working conditions or to crew safety.
Na podlagi te sheme, ki se je uporabljala vsaj od osemdesetih let 20. stoletja do 14. januarja 2005, se je pomoč lahko dodelila za posodobitev ribiških plovil v zvezi z večjimi izboljšavami, kot so na primer boljše skladiščenje ulovov, zamenjava motorja, izboljšanje delovnih razmer ali varnosti posadke.
Aid was granted up to 10 % of the total cost of the improvement project, with a maximum amount of GBP 40000 per vessel.
Pomoč se je dodelila v višini največ 10 % vseh stroškov projekta za izboljšanje, pri čemer je bil najvišji znesek 40000 GBP na plovilo.
Only one application per year could be considered.
Obravnaval se je le en zahtevek na leto.
Improvement projects which exceeded 50 % of the costs of a new vessel of the same type were not eligible, as well as work to vessels less than five years old.
Projekti za izboljšanje, ki so presegli 50 % vrednosti novega plovila istega tipa, in dela na plovilih, mlajših od pet let, niso bili upravičeni do pomoči.
The works had to meet all the required standards specified by Shetland Seafood Quality Control.
Dela so morala biti v skladu z vsemi zahtevanimi standardi organizacije Shetland Seafood Quality Control.
All applicants had to hold a pressure stock licence and other relevant certificates of competency and applicants had to become members of the Shetlands Fishermen's Association.
Vsi vlagatelji zahtevkov so morali imeti dovoljenje za ribolov ogroženih vrst in druga ustrezna spričevala o usposobljenosti ter postati člani shetlandske ribiške zveze.
The beneficiary of the aid had to undertake to operate the vessel full-time, to retain ownership of the vessel and to provide full-time employment for the vessel crew for a period of at least five years from receipt of the aid.
Upravičenec do pomoči se je moral zavezati, da bo plovilo delovalo polni delovni čas, da bo ostal lastnik plovila in zagotovil zaposlitev posadke plovila za polni delovni čas v obdobju vsaj pet let od prejema pomoči.
Finally, beneficiaries had a yearly reporting obligation in order to prove that all conditions had been complied with and the scheme contained a provision for reimbursement of the aid in case of non-compliance with any of the conditions.
Končno, upravičenci so morali vsako leto predložiti poročilo kot dokazilo, da so se upoštevali vsi pogoji, medtem ko je shema vključevala določbo o vračilu pomoči v primeru neupoštevanja katerega od pogojev.
The Commission had serious doubts that the aid granted under the scheme after 1 July 2001 could be regarded as compatible with the requirements of the Guidelines for the examination of State aid to fisheries and aquaculture of 2001 [4] (‘2001 Guidelines’) in conjunction with Article 9 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999 of 17 December 1999 laying down the detailed rules and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries sector [5], in particular with the conditions that no aid may be granted for modernisation of fishing vessels if it concerns capacity in terms of tonnage or of power.
Komisija je resno dvomila o tem, da se lahko pomoč, dodeljena na podlagi sheme po 1. juliju 2001, obravnava kot skladna z zahtevami iz Smernic za pregled državnih pomoči za ribištvo in ribogojstvo iz leta 2001 [4] („smernice iz leta 2001“) v povezavi s členom 9 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2792/1999 z dne 17. decembra 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil in sporazumov glede strukturne pomoči Skupnosti v ribiškem sektorju [5], zlasti s pogoji, da se pomoči za posodobitev ribiških plovil ne sme dodeliti, če zadeva zmogljivost v smislu nosilnosti ali moči.
In its letters dated 16 October 2006 and 6 February 2007, the United Kingdom provided further information on the individual aids granted under the scheme after 1 July 2001.
Z dopisi z dne 16. oktobra 2006 in 6. februarja 2007 je Združeno kraljestvo predložilo dodatne informacije o posamezni pomoči, dodeljeni na podlagi sheme po 1. juliju 2001.
In the period from August 2002 until June 2005, 23 aids were granted for vessel modernisation, concerning, amongst others, fish handling systems, fire fighting equipment, aid for winches or deck cranes and for engine replacement.
V obdobju od avgusta 2002 do junija 2005 je bila za posodobitev plovil pomoč dodeljena 23-krat, med drugim je zadevala sisteme za ravnanje z ribami, protipožarno opremo, pomoč za vitle ali dvigala na krovu ter za zamenjavo motorja.
The amount of aid granted varied between GBP 403 and GBP 7090 per beneficiary.
Znesek dodeljene pomoči se je gibal med 403 GBP in 7090 GBP na upravičenca.
As regards compliance with the condition of Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999 that no aid may be granted when the modernisation concerns capacity in terms of tonnage or of power, the United Kingdom stated that none of the improvements facilitated by the grants of aid affected the gross tonnage or the power of any vessel.
Kar zadeva združljivost s pogojem iz člena 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 2792/1999, da se pomoči ne sme dodeliti, če posodobitev zadeva zmogljivost v smislu nosilnosti ali moči, je Združeno kraljestvo navedlo, da ni bila nobena od izboljšav, ki so jih omogočile pomoči, povezana z bruto nosilnostjo ali močjo katerega koli plovila.
In addition, the United Kingdom provided information showing that none of the grants of aid exceeded 40 % of the eligible costs.
Razen tega je Združeno kraljestvo predložilo informacije, iz katerih je razvidno, da nobena od dodelitev pomoči ni presegla 40 % upravičenih stroškov.
Finally, the United Kingdom maintained that if the Commission adopts a negative decision, recovery of aid granted prior to 3 June 2003 should not be required as it would be contrary to the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.
Končno, Združeno kraljestvo je trdilo, da se v primeru negativne odločbe Komisije ne sme zahtevati vračila pomoči, dodeljene pred 3. junijem 2003, ker bi bilo to v nasprotju z načelom varovanja pravno utemeljenih pričakovanj.
In that respect, the United Kingdom made reference to Commission Decision 2003/612/EC of 3 June 2003 on loans for the purchase of fishing quotas in the Shetland Islands (United Kingdom) [6] and Commission Decision 2006/226/EC of 7 December 2005 on Investments of Shetland Leasing and Property Developments in the Shetland Islands (United Kingdom) [7], stating that until 3 June 2003, the Shetland Islands Council legitimately considered the funds used for such aid to be private rather than public.
V zvezi s tem se je Združeno kraljestvo sklicevalo na Odločbo Komisije 2003/612/ES z dne 3. junija 2003 o posojilih za nakup ribolovnih kvot na Shetlandskih otokih (Združeno kraljestvo) [6] in Odločbo Komisije 2006/226/ES z dne 7. decembra 2005 o naložbah Shetland Leasing and Property Developments na Shetlandskih otokih (Združeno kraljestvo) [7] ter navedlo, da je do 3. junija 2003 Svet Shetlandskih otokov sredstva za takšno pomoč pravno utemeljeno obravnaval kot zasebna in ne javna.
It must be determined firstly if the measure can be regarded as State aid and if so, if it is compatible with the common market.
Najprej je treba opredeliti, ali se ukrep lahko šteje za državno pomoč, in če je tako, ali je ta pomoč združljiva s skupnim trgom.
Aid has been granted to a limited number of companies within the fisheries sector, and is thus of a selective nature.
Pomoč se je dodelila omejenemu številu podjetij v ribiškem sektorju in je torej selektivna.
The aid has been granted by the Shetland Islands Council from state resources.
Pomoč je dodelil Svet Shetlandskih otokov iz državnih sredstev.
The aid benefited recipients which are in direct competition with other companies in the fisheries sector, both within the United Kingdom, and in other Member States.
Do pomoči so bili upravičeni prejemniki, ki neposredno konkurirajo ostalim podjetjem v ribiškem sektorju v Združenem kraljestvu in drugih državah članicah.
Therefore, the measures distort or threaten to distort competition and are to be considered State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Zato ukrepi izkrivljajo ali bi lahko izkrivljali konkurenco ter se štejejo za državno pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
As regards State aid to the fisheries sector, State aid is deemed to be compatible with the common market if it complies with the conditions of the Guidelines for the examination of State aid to fisheries and aquaculture [8] of 2004 (‘2004 Guidelines’).
Kar zadeva državno pomoč za ribiški sektor, se državna pomoč obravnava kot združljiva s skupnim trgom, če izpolnjuje pogoje iz Smernic za pregled državnih pomoči za ribištvo in ribogojstvo [8] iz leta 2004 („smernice iz leta 2004“).
According to the second paragraph of point 5.3 of the 2004 Guidelines: ‘an “unlawful aid” within the meaning of Article 1(f) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 will be appraised in accordance with the guidelines applicable at the time when the administrative act setting up the aid has entered into force’.
V skladu z drugim odstavkom točke 5.3 smernic iz leta 2004 se bo „ ‚nezakonita pomoč‘ po členu 1(f) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999 […] oceni[la] v skladu s smernicami, ki so se uporabljale takrat, ko je začel veljati upravni akt o ustanovitvi pomoči“.
This is also in accordance with the general rules expressed in the Commission notice on the determination of the applicable rules for the assessment of unlawful State aid [9].
To je tudi v skladu s splošnimi pravili iz obvestila Komisije o določanju uporabnih pravil za oceno nelegalne državne pomoči [9].