natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In consideration of these comments, the Italian authorities undertook, in the context of this measure, to suspend the payment of the aid at issue if the beneficiary was a company that had not yet reimbursed or paid into a blocked account any illegal and incompatible aid received on the basis of one of the aid measures mentioned by the Commission in its decision initiating the procedure.
Pri obravnavanju teh pripomb so se italijanski organi zavezali, da v kontekstu tega ukrepa zadržijo plačilo zadevne pomoči, če je prejemnik podjetje, ki še ni povrnilo ali vplačalo na blokirani račun kakršne koli nezakonite ali nezdružljive pomoči, prejete na podlagi enega od ukrepov pomoči, ki jih je navedla Komisija v svoji odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka.
The Commission further notes that during the procedure under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty it did not receive any comments from third parties that the proposed aid may affect trading conditions and distort competition to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Komisija nadalje ugotavlja, da med postopkom po členu 88(2) Pogodbe ES ni prejela nikakršnih pripomb od tretjih strank, da bi predlagana pomoč lahko vplivala na pogoje trgovanja in izkrivljala konkurenco v obsegu, ki je v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission concludes that the measure complies with the relevant provisions of the Environmental Aid Guidelines applied by analogy and the relevant provisions of the Energy Tax Directive.
Na podlagi zgornjega Komisija sklepa, da je ukrep skladen z veljavnimi določbami Smernic o okoljski pomoči, uporabljenih po analogiji, in veljavnimi določbami Direktive o davku na energijo.
Furthermore, Italy has undertaken to suspend the granting of new aid under the current scheme to firms which have not reimbursed the incompatible aid in compliance with the relevant previous recovery decision.
Poleg tega se je Italija zavezala, da zadrži odobritev nove pomoči po veljavnem programu podjetjem, ki niso povrnila nezdružljive pomoči v skladu z veljavno prejšnjo odločitvijo o povrnitvi.
The measure can therefore be deemed compatible with the common market pursuant to Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty,
Zato lahko ukrep šteje za združljivega s skupnim trgom po členu 87(3)(c) Pogodbe –
The measure which Italy is planning to implement for tax rebates on emulsions for 2006, amounting to EUR 8,9 million, is compatible with the common market within the meaning of Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty.
Ukrep, ki ga namerava uresničiti Italija za znižanje davka na emulzije za leto 2006, v znesku 8,9 milijona EUR, je združljiv s skupnim trgom v smislu člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe.
Implementation of the measure is accordingly authorised.
V skladu s tem se izvedba ukrepa odobri.
Done in Brussels, 6 December 2006.
V Bruslju, 6. decembra 2006
OJ C 157, 6.7.2006, p. 8.
UL C 157, 6.7.2006, str. 8.
Studies carried out by Laboratori ENI Tecnologie and the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre in Ispra (for example, research undertaken within Action 2113 – Emissions Characterisation and Inventories).
Študije sta opravila Laboratori ENI Tecnologie in Skupno raziskovalno središče Evropske komisije v Ispri (na primer, raziskava v okviru ukrepa 2113 – Opis in popis emisij).
Actual reductions depend on the waterdiesel ratio.
Dejanska znižanja so odvisna od razmerja med vodo in dizelskim gorivom.
Including large cities like Milan, Rome, Naples, Turin and Genoa.
Vključno z velikimi mesti, kot so Milano, Rim, Neapelj, Torino in Genova.
ETD – Energy Tax Directive
DDE – Direktiva o davku na energijo.
OJ L 352, 27.11.2004, p. 10.
UL L 352, 27.11.2004, str. 10.
OJ L 100, 20.4.2005, p. 46.
UL L 100, 20.4.2005, str. 46.
Among others, the White Paper of 1997 on renewable energies (COM(1997) 599 final, 26.11.1997), the Commission Green paper on energy supply safety in the European Union (COM(2000) 769, 29.11.2000), and the Commission’s communication on alternative fuels for road transport and on a set of measures to promote the use of biofuels (COM(2001) 547, 7.11.2001).
Med drugim Bela knjiga iz leta 1997 o obnovljivih energijah (COM(1997) 599 konč., 26.11.1997), Zelena knjiga Komisije o varni oskrbi z energijo v Evropski uniji (COM(2000) 769, 29.11.2000) in Sporočilo Komisije o alternativnih gorivih za cestni promet in paketu ukrepov za spodbujanje uporabe biogoriv (COM(2001) 547, 7.11.2001).
See the final report on the Programme prepared for DG Energy on the following website: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/oil/fuels/doc/alternative_fuels_en.pdf
Glej končno poročilo o programu, ki ga je pripravil Generalni direktorat za energetiko na spletnem naslovu: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/oil/fuels/doc/alternative_fuels_en.pdf
For comparisons with heavy fuel oil emulsions an average market price surveyed by the Milan Chamber of Commerce has been used.
Za primerjave z emulzijami s težkim kurilnim oljem je bila uporabljena povprečna tržna cena, ki jo je pregledala Milanska gospodarska zbornica.
This refers to the average price for Platt’s Low sulphur Diesel over the first 15 days in March 2006 + EUR 25/1000 litres which corresponds to an average of the difference between the extra-network price and Platt’s.
To se nanaša na povprečno ceno dizelskega goriva z nizko vsebnostjo žvepla po Plattu v prvih 15 dneh marca 2006 + 25 EUR/1000 litrov, kar ustreza povprečju razlike med ceno izredne mreže in Plattom.
It has been assumed that the density of the gas oil is 0,845 kg/l.
Predvidena je bila gostota plinskega olja 0,845 kg/l.
For heavy fuel for heating the price refers to the average market price surveyed by the Milan Chamber of Commerce.
Pri težkem gorivu za ogrevanje se cena nanaša na povprečno tržno ceno, ki jo je pregledala Milanska gospodarska zbornica.
If the difference is positive, the level of aid is allowable.
Če je razlika pozitivna, je stopnja pomoči dopustna.
If the difference is negative, the level of aid is too high and results in overcompensation.
Če je razlika negativna, je stopnja pomoči previsoka in ima za posledico prekomerno kompenzacijo.
Case C-355/95P Textilwerke Deggendorf GmbG (TWD) v Commission [1997] ECR I-2549, paragraphs 25-27.
Zadeva C-355/95P Textilwerke Deggendorf GmbG (TWD) proti Komisiji [1997] Recueil I-2549, odstavki 25–27.
Emulsified fuels are a blend of approximately 15 % water and 85 % fuel oil or gas oil.
Emulgirana goriva so mešanica približno 15 % vode in 85 % kurilnega ali plinskega olja.
They have a lower impact on the environment than conventional fuels.
Imajo manjši učinek na okolje kot konvencionalna goriva.
Recent studies [3] show that adding water to fuels leads to higher quality of combustion in terms of emissions.
Nedavne študije [3] kažejo, da dodajanje vode gorivom vodi k višji kakovosti zgorevanja v smislu emisij.
Vaporisation of water during the combustion process increases fuel dispersion resulting in increased contact surface between fuel and air.
Izparevanje vode med procesom zgorevanja poveča razpršitev goriva, kar ima za posledico večjo stično površino med gorivom in zrakom.
The aid offsets the cost difference between conventional fuels and emulsions.
Pomoč izravnava razliko v stroških med konvencionalnimi gorivi in emulzijami.
In this way, it tackles a market failure, i.e. that the environmental benefits of emulsions are not reflected in the market price of conventional fuels.
Tako obravnava tržno nepopolnost, tj. da se koristi emulzij za okolje ne odražajo v tržni ceni konvencionalnih goriv.
The measure is to apply for one year: from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2006.
Ukrep naj bi veljal eno leto: od 1. januarja 2006 do 31. decembra 2006.
The planned budget is EUR 8,9 million. The beneficiaries of the scheme will be between 11 and 50 emulsions producers.
Načrtovani proračun znaša 8,9 milijona EUR. Od tega programa bo imelo koristi od 11 do 50 proizvajalcev emulzij.
The Italian authorities referred to the comments submitted by the Unione Petrolifera to the Commission on the beneficiaries of the aid at issue.
Italijanski organi so se sklicevali na pripombe, ki jih je Komisiji poslal Unione Petrolifera glede prejemnikov zadevne pomoči.
In consideration of these comments, the Italian authorities undertook to suspend the payment of the aid at issue if the beneficiary was a company that had not yet reimbursed or paid into a blocked account any illegal and incompatible aid received on the basis of one of the aid measures mentioned by the Commission.
Pri obravnavanju teh pripomb so se italijanski organi zavezali, da zadržijo plačilo zadevne pomoči, če je prejemnik podjetje, ki še ni povrnilo ali na blokirani račun vplačalo vse nezakonite ali nezdružljive pomoči, prejete na podlagi enega od ukrepov pomoči, ki jih je navedla Komisija.
Emulsion fuels are not included in the definition of renewable energy sources in Directive 2001/77/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2001 on the promotion of electricity produced from renewable energy sources in the internal electricity market [13] and are not considered biofuels by Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 May 2003 on the promotion of the use of biofuels or other renewable fuels for transport [14].
Emulzijska goriva niso vključena v opredelitev obnovljivih virov energije v Direktivi 2001/77/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. septembra 2001 o spodbujanju proizvodnje električne energije iz obnovljivih virov energije na notranjem trgu z električno energijo [13] in ne veljajo za biogoriva po Direktivi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2003/30/ES z dne 8. maja 2003 o pospeševanju rabe biogoriv in drugih obnovljivih goriv v sektorju prevoza [14].
However, using emulsion fuels results in a reduction in pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.
Vendar pa ima uporaba emulzijskih goriv za posledico zmanjšanje onesnaževanja in emisij toplogrednih plinov.
Adding water to fossil fuels results in a physically different product with improved combustion quality and consequent environmental benefits.
Dodajanje vode fosilnim gorivom ima za posledico fizično drugačen proizvod z izboljšano kakovostjo zgorevanja in posledičnimi koristmi za okolje.
This gives rise to the application of the first indent of Article 5 of the Directive.
To daje povod za uporabo prve alinee člena 5 Direktive.
on State aid No C 3/2005 (ex N 592/2004 (ex PL 51/2004)) which Poland is planning to implement for Fabryka Samochodow Osobowych SA (formerly DAEWOO — FSO Motor SA)
o državni pomoči C 3/2005 (ex N 592/2004 (ex PL 51/2004)), katere izvedbo načrtuje Poljska za Fabryka Samochodow Osobowych S.A. (prej DAEWOO – FSO Motor S.A.)
(notified under document number C(2006) 6628)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 6628)
Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 62(1)(a) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sporazma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru in zlasti člena 62(1)(a) Sporazuma,
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments [1] pursuant to those provisions,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe [1] v skladu z navedenimi členi,
By letter dated 30 April 2004 Poland notified the Commission of aid to DAEWOO-FSO MOTOR S.A., which changed its name to Fabryka Samochodów Osobowych S.A. (hereinafter ‘FSO’ or ‘the beneficiary’), as aid granted before accession.
Z dopisom z dne 30. aprila 2004 je Poljska Komisiji priglasila pomoč družbi DAEWOO-FSO MOTOR S.A., ki je spremenila svoje ime v Fabryka Samochodów Osobowych S.A. (v nadaljnjem besedilu družba „FSO“ ali „upravičenka“), kot pomoč, odobreno pred pristopom.
By letter dated 19 May 2004 the Commission asked Poland to submit some missing documents.
Z dopisom z dne 19. maja 2004 je Komisija zaprosila Poljsko, naj predloži nekatere manjkajoče dokumente.
These were provided on 18 June 2004.
Ti so bili predloženi dne 18. junija 2004.
The Commission requested further information by letters dated 2 August 2004 and 6 October 2004, to which Poland replied by letter registered on 13 September 2004, and by letter dated 3 November 2004 respectively.
Komisija je zaprosila za dodatne podatke z dopisoma z dne 2. avgusta 2004 in 6. oktobra 2004, na katera je Poljska odgovorila z dopisom, evidentiranim 13. septembra 2004, oziroma z dopisom z dne 3. novembra 2004.
On 9 November 2004 a meeting took place between the Commission and the Polish authorities.
novembra 2004 so se sestali predstavniki Komisije in poljskih organov.
On 5 January 2005, the Polish authorities accepted that the Commission would also treat the notification of 30 April 2004 as a notification under Article 88(3) EC Treaty with regard to any measures which were found to constitute new aid.
januarja 2005 so se poljski organi strinjali s tem, da bo Komisija prav tako obravnavala priglasitev z dne 30. aprila 2004 kot priglasitev v skladu s členom 88(3) Pogodbe ES v zvezi s kakršnimi koli ukrepi, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da so nova pomoč.
By letter dated 19 January 2005, the Commission informed Poland that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid which had not been granted before accession and constituted new aid.
Z dopisom z dne 19. januarja 2005 je Komisija sporočila Poljski, da se je odločila sprožiti postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES glede pomoči, ki ni bila dodeljena pred pristopom in je pomenila novo pomoč.
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 26 April 2005 [2].
Odločitev Komisije, da sproži postopek, je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije z dne 26. aprila 2005 [2].
The Commission invited interested parties to submit comments on the measures.
Komisija je pozvala vse zainteresirane stranke, naj predložijo svoje pripombe o ukrepih.
No third party submitted comments.
Pripomb ni predložila nobena tretja stranka.
In a letter dated 28 February 2005, registered on 1 March 2005, the Polish authorities asked for an extension of the deadline to submit its comments on the opening of the formal investigation procedure.
Z dopisom z dne 28. februarja 2005, evidentiranim 1. marca 2005, so poljski organi zaprosili za podaljšanje roka za predložitev svojih pripomb v zvezi s sprožitvijo formalnega postopka preiskave.
Poland submitted a partial response by letter dated 1 April 2005, registered on 4 April 2005.
Poljska je predložila delni odgovor z dopisom z dne 1. aprila 2005, evidentiranim 4. aprila 2005.
In the same letter Poland asked for the deadline for providing additional information to be extended to 15 April 2005, because it needed time to update the restructuring plan.
V tem dopisu je Poljska zaprosila za podaljšanje roka za predložitev dodatnih podatkov do 15. aprila 2005, ker je potrebovala čas za posodobitev načrta za prestrukturiranje.
By letter dated 27 April 2005, registered on 29 April 2005, the Polish authorities asked for the deadline for providing the supplementary information to be extended again, to 13 May 2005.
Z dopisom z dne 27. aprila 2005, evidentiranim 29. aprila 2005, so poljski organi zaprosili za ponovno podaljšanje roka za predložitev dodatnih podatkov do 13. maja 2005.
This information, together with an updated version of the restructuring plan, was submitted by letter dated 31 of May 2005, registered on 2 June 2005.
Ti podatki so bili predloženi skupaj s posodobljeno različico načrta za prestrukturiranje z dopisom z dne 31. maja 2005, evidentiranim 2. junija 2005.
Additional comments were submitted by letter dated 13 June 2005, registered on 14 June 2005.
Dodatne pripombe so bile predložene z dopisom z dne 13. junija 2005, evidentiranim 14. junija 2005.
By letter dated 4 August 2005, registered on 8 August 2005, Poland informed the Commission that a new investor had been found for FSO.
Z dopisom z dne 4. avgusta 2005, evidentiranim 8. avgusta 2005, je Poljska sporočila Komisiji, da se je za družbo FSO našel nov investitor.
By letter dated 28 September 2005, registered on 29 September 2005, the Polish authorities informed the Commission that an updated restructuring plan would be submitted in November 2005 together with a description of the models produced.
Z dopisom z dne 28. septembra 2005, evidentiranim 29. septembra 2005, so poljski organi sporočili Komisiji, da bo načrt za prestrukturiranje predložen novembra 2005 skupaj z opisom proizvajanih modelov.
By letter dated 16 November 2005, registered on the following day, Poland submitted the English version of the FSO stock valuation.
Z dopisom z dne 16. novembra 2005, evidentiranim naslednjega dne, je Poljska predložila angleško različico vrednotenja stanja zalog družbe FSO.
The Commission requested supplementary information on 12 December 2005.
Komisija je zaprosila za dodatne podatke 12. decembra 2005.
The Polish authorities submitted further information by letter dated 15 December 2005, registered on 19 December 2005, in which the announced update of the restructuring plan was submitted.
Poljski organi so predložili dodatne podatke z dopisom z dne 15. decembra 2005, evidentiranim 19. decembra 2005, v katerem je bila predložena najavljena posodobitev načrta za prestrukturiranje.
In the same letter Poland informed the Commission that it would provide more information in the coming weeks.
V istem dopisu je Poljska sporočila Komisiji, da bo predložila več podatkov v prihodnjih tednih.
In its letter of 3 January 2006, registered on 5 January 2006, Poland submitted a partial response to the Commission’s request for information of 12 December 2005 and asked to be given more time (up to 23 January 2006) to provide the remaining information.
V svojem dopisu z dne 3. januarja 2006, evidentiranem 5. januarja 2006, je Poljska predložila delni odgovor na zahtevek Komisije po podatkih z dne 12. decembra 2005 in je prosila, da se ji da na voljo več časa (do 23. januarja 2006), da bi lahko predložila preostale podatke.
By letter dated 26 January 2006, registered on 30 January 2006, the Polish authorities submitted part of the additional information, requesting an extension of the deadline to 6 February 2006.
Z dopisom z dne 26. januarja 2006, evidentiranim 30. januarja 2006, so poljski organi predložili del dodatnih podatkov in zaprosili za podaljšanje roka do 6. februarja 2006.
By letter dated 14 February 2006, registered on 15 February 2006, Poland provided the missing points of the response to the Commission’s letter of 12 December 2005.
Z dopisom z dne 14. februarja 2006, evidentiranim 15. februarja 2006, je Poljska predložila manjkajoče točke odgovora na dopis Komisije z dne 12. decembra 2005.
On 21 February 2006, a meeting between the Commission services, the Polish authorities, FSO management and the investor AvtoZAZ was held in Brussels.
februarja 2006 so se v Bruslju sestali predstavniki služb Komisije, poljskih organov, uprave družbe FSO in investitor AvtoZAZ.
Following the meeting, on 8 March 2006, the Commission sent Poland a request for further information.
Po tem sestanku je dne 8. marca 2006 Komisija poslala Poljski zahtevek za dodatne podatke.
Poland replied by letter dated 6 April 2006, registered on the following day.
Poljska je odgovorila z dopisom z dne 6. aprila 2006, evidentiranim naslednjega dne.
In a letter to Poland dated 27 April 2006, the Commission allowed an extension of the deadline for submitting the final version of the restructuring plan to 20 May 2006.
Z dopisom Poljski z dne 27. aprila 2006 je Komisija dovolila podaljšanje roka za predložitev končne različice načrta za prestrukturiranje do 20. maja 2006.
The information was submitted by the Polish authorities by letter dated 22 May 2006, registered on the following day.
Poljski organi so podatke predložili z dopisom z dne 22. maja 2006, evidentiranim naslednjega dne.
By letters dated 28 and 29 June 2006, both registered on the following day, the Polish authorities informed the Commission that a licence agreement had just been signed for the production of a new car model by FSO.
Z dopisoma z dne 28. in 29. junija 2006, evidentiranima naslednjega dne, so poljski organi sporočili Komisiji, da je družba FSO pravkar podpisala licenčno pogodbo za proizvodnjo novega modela avtomobila.
On 29 June 2006, a meeting was held with the Polish authorities.
junija 2006 je potekal sestanek s poljskimi organi.
By letter dated 5 July 2006, the Commission requested further information, which the Polish authorities provided by letters dated 19 and 27 July 2006.
Z dopisom z dne 5. julija 2006 je Komisija zaprosila za dodatne podatke, ki so jih poljski organi predložili z dopisoma z dne 19. in 27. julija 2006.
The Polish authorities submitted additional information by letter dated 30 August 2006 and during a meeting on 31 August 2006.
Poljski organi so predložili dodatne podatke z dopisom z dne 30. avgusta 2006 in med sestankom dne 31. avgusta 2006.
By letter dated 6 September 2006, the Commission requested further information, which was provided by letter dated 3 October 2006, registered on the following day.
Z dopisom z dne 6. septembra 2006 je Komisija zaprosila za dodatne podatke, ki so bili predloženi z dopisom z dne 3. oktobra 2006, evidentiranim naslednjega dne.
Poland informed the Commission that it would provide more information in the next 10 working days.
Poljska je Komisiji sporočila, da bo več podatkov predložila v naslednjih 10 delovnih dneh.
Poland submitted additional information by letter dated 17 October 2006, registered on 19 October 2006.
Poljska je predložila dodatne podatke z dopisom z dne 17. oktobra 2006, evidentiranim 19. oktobra 2006.
In this letter, the Polish authorities requested a meeting with the Commission services.
S tem dopisom so poljski organi zaprosili za sestanek s službami Komisije.
This meeting took place in Brussels on 7 November 2006.
Ta sestanek je potekal v Bruslju 7. novembra 2006.
Following this meeting the Polish authorities sent a letter on 17 November 2006.
Po tem sestanku so poljski organi poslali dopis 17. novembra 2006.
Beneficiary of the aid
Upravičenka do pomoči
FSO is a Polish car manufacturer.
Družba FSO je poljska proizvajalka avtomobilov.
The company’s main production plant is located in Warsaw, which is an assisted area under Article 87(3)(a) of the EC Treaty.
Glavni proizvodni obrat družbe se nahaja v Varšavi, ki je območje, ki prejema pomoč v skladu s členom 87(3)(a) Pogodbe ES.
It manufactures passenger cars, spare parts and accessories.
Izdeluje osebna vozila, rezervne dele in dodatke.
Its main source of revenue since the end of the nineties has been the manufacture of the Daewoo brand vehicles Matiz and Lanos.
Glavni vir prihodka družbe je od konca devetdesetih let 20. stoletja proizvodnja vozil znamke Daewoo Matiz in Lanos.
FSO S.A. now controls 18 subsidiaries (service, manufacture of components, sales) down from […] [3] in 1999.
Družba FSO S.A. ima sedaj nadzor nad 18 hčerinskimi družbami – (servis, proizvodnja sestavnih delov, prodaja), kar je zmanjšanje v primerjavi z […] [3] leta 1999.
The predecessor of FSO had been in business in Poland since the 1950s and was one of the two largest Polish car manufacturers.
Predhodnica družbe FSO je na Poljskem tržišču prisotna od petdesetih let 20. stoletja in je bila ena od obeh največjih poljskih proizvajalk avtomobilov.
A joint venture agreement was concluded in 1996 between Daewoo Motor Corporation Ltd (‘DMC’) and the former Ministry of Industry and Trade.
Pogodba o ustanovitvi mešane družbe je bila sklenjena leta 1996 med Daewoo Motor Corporation Ltd („DMC“) in prejšnjim Ministrstvom za industrijo in trgovino.
Daewoo acquired 70 % of the newly created entity DAEWOO-FSO MOTOR S.A. About 25 % of the company was owned by the State Treasury and the rest by minority shareholders.
Daewoo je pridobil 70-odstotni delež novo ustanovljene družbe DAEWOO-FSO MOTOR S.A. Okoli 25 % družbe je bilo v lasti državne zakladnice, preostanek pa v lasti manjšinskih delničarjev.
Since then the company name has been Fabryka Samochodów Osobowych (‘FSO’).
Od tedaj se družba imenuje Fabryka Samochodów Osobowych („FSO“).
Difficulties and efforts to find a strategic investor
Težave in prizadevanja za pridobitev strateškega investitorja
FSO’s difficulties are mainly the result of the bankruptcy of its largest shareholder, DMC, in 2000.
Težave FSO so v glavnem posledica stečaja DMC, njenega nejvečjega delničarja, leta 2000.