natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Under Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, where negative decisions are taken in the case of unlawful aid, the Commission is to decide that the Member State concerned must take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary.
V skladu s členom 14(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999 mora Komisija, kadar so sprejete negativne odločbe v primeru nezakonite pomoči, odločiti, da mora zadevna država članica sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za vračilo pomoči od upravičenca.
The funds used for the financing of the scheme are the same funds used for the aids subject to the negative decisions taken by the Commission in Decisions 2003/612/EC and 2006/226/EC, as referred to in Recital 13.
Sredstva, ki se uporabljajo za financiranje sheme, so enaka sredstva, kot se uporabljajo za pomoč, glede na negativne odločbe Komisije iz odločb 2003/612/ES in 2006/226/ES, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 13.
In those cases, the Commission considered that those funds had to be regarded as State resources for the purposes of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
V navedenih primerih je Komisija menila, da je treba navedena sredstva obravnavati kot državna sredstva v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
At the same time, the Commission acknowledged that in the specific circumstances of the cases in question, legitimate expectations as to the private nature of the fund in question had been created on the part of the Shetland authorities and bodies involved through the combination of a number of elements taken together which precluded recovery of the incompatible State aid.
Komisija je hkrati priznala, da je v posebnih okoliščinah zadevnih primerov več elementov skupaj izzvalo pravno utemeljena pričakovanja Sveta Shetlandskih otokov in udeleženih organov glede zasebne narave zadevnega sklada, kar je onemogočilo vračilo nezdružljive državne pomoči.
The Commission considers, however, that in this case the elements taken into account in Decisions 2003/612/EC and 2006/226/EC cannot be applied in the same way and the legitimate expectations have not been created.
Vendar Komisija meni, da se v tem primeru elementi, upoštevani v odločbah 2006/226/ES in 2003/612/ES, ne morejo uporabljati na enak način, zato niso nastala pravno utemeljena pričakovanja.
The Commission notes, in particular, the actions and statements from the United Kingdom, clearly showing that, at the respective times of granting of aid, the responsible authorities were convinced that the scheme was in fact a State aid scheme and that the rules on State aid were applicable.
Komisija zlasti ugotavlja, da dejanja in izjave Združenega kraljestva jasno kažejo, da so bili med dodeljevanjem pomoči odgovorni organi prepričani, da je shema dejansko shema državne pomoči in da veljajo pravila o državni pomoči.
To reach that conclusion, the Commission observes that, unlike the aids subject to Decisions 2003/612/EC and 2006/226/EC, the scheme in question has been set up as a normal aid scheme and concerns direct grants to fishermen, granted directly by the Shetland Islands Council.
Komisija je pri sprejemanju tega sklepa ugotovila, da je bila zadevna shema za razliko od pomoči, za katere veljata odločbi 2003/612/ES in 2006/226/ES, vzpostavljena kot običajna shema pomoči ter zadeva neposredno subvencijo za ribiče, ki jo je neposredno dodelil Svet Shetlandskih otokov.
In addition, the specific circumstances of this case clearly show that the United Kingdom considered the State aid rules to be applicable, as they have continuously included the expenditure under the scheme in the annual UK State aid reports submitted to the Commission in accordance with Community obligations.
Razen tega posebne okoliščine tega primera jasno kažejo, da so organi Združenega kraljestva menili, da veljajo pravila o državni pomoči, ker so izdatke na podlagi sheme redno vključevali v letna poročila Združenega kraljestva o državni pomoči in jih predložili Komisiji v skladu z obveznostmi Skupnosti.
In fact, in response to questions posed by the Commission, the United Kingdom stated in its letter dated 10 December 2004 that: ‘payments under the schemes have been included in the Annual State Aid Inventory and sent to the Commission annually, as required, for many years’ and in its letter dated 6 April 2005 that: ‘My authorities have, over many years, acted in good faith and in the belief that the Schemes were compliant with the State aid guidelines’.
Kot odgovor na vprašanja Komisije je Združeno kraljestvo z dopisom z dne 10. decembra 2004 dejansko navedlo, da: „plačila na podlagi shem so bila vključena v letni popis državnih pomoči in več let redno predložena Komisiji, kot je bilo zahtevano “v dopisu z dne 6. aprila 2005 pa je navedlo: „Naši organi so več let delovali v dobri veri in prepričanju, da so sheme združljive s smernicami o državni pomoči.“
With regard to those statements and the circumstances of the case, the Commission considers that requiring the recovery of the aid cannot be considered to be contradictory to a general principle of Community law.
Ob upoštevanju teh izjav in okoliščin primera Komisija meni, da zahteva za vračilo pomoči ni v nasprotju s splošnim načelom zakonodaje Skupnosti.
Thus, in accordance with Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 the Commission considers that United Kingdom must take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary of the scheme, without prejudice to cases falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 875/2007 of 24 July 2007 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to de minimis aid in the fisheries sector and amending Regulation (EC) No 1860/2004 [11].
Zato Komisija v skladu s členom 14(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999 meni, da mora Združeno kraljestvo sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za vračilo pomoči od upravičenca do sheme brez poseganja v primere, ki spadajo na področje uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 875/2007 z dne 24. julija 2007 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES za pomoč de minimis v ribiškem sektorju in o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 1860/2004 [11].
This interest should be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [12].
Te obresti je treba izračunati z obrestnoobrestnim računom v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 [12].
The Commission would ask United Kingdom to return to it the attached questionnaire concerning the current status of the recovery procedure.
Komisija prosi Združeno kraljestvo, da ji vrne priloženi vprašalnik o sedanjem stanju v postopku vračanja.
In the light of the assessment made in Section IV, the Commission finds that the United Kingdom has, in breach of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty, unlawfully granted aid to Shetland Fish Products Limited under the Fish factory improvement scheme.
Glede na oceno iz oddelka IV Komisija ugotavlja, da je Združeno kraljestvo s kršitvijo člena 88(3) Pogodbe ES nezakonito dodelilo pomoč podjetju Shetland Fish Products Limited na podlagi Sheme za izboljšanje ribiške tovarne.
The Commission considers that this aid is not compatible with the common market, as far as it concerns the aid granted on 13 August 1997, 7 January 1999, 25 February 1999, 10 December 1999, 19 January 2001 and 15 December 2004, amounting to a total amount of GBP 92009.
Komisija meni, da ta pomoč ni združljiva s skupnim trgom, kar zadeva pomoč, dodeljeno 13. avgusta 1997, 7. januarja 1999, 25. februarja 1999, 10. decembra 1999, 19. januarja 2001 in 15. decembra 2004, ki znaša skupaj 92009 GBP.
The aid granted on 3 September 1998 amounting to a total of GBP 1592 is considered compatible with the common market,
Pomoč, dodeljena 3. septembra 1998, znaša 1592 GBP in šteje za združljivo s skupnim trgom –
The aid granted to Shetland Fish Products under the Fish factory improvement scheme is compatible with the common market as far as it concerns the amount of GBP 1592, granted on 3 September 1998.
Pomoč, dodeljena podjetju Shetland Fish Products iz Sheme za izboljšanje ribiške tovarne, je združljiva s skupnim trgom, kar zadeva pomoč v višini 1592 GBP, dodeljeno 3. septembra 1998.
The aid granted to Shetland Fish Products under the Fish factory improvement scheme is incompatible with the common market as far as it concerns the amount of GBP 92007, granted on 13 August 1997, 7 January 1999, 25 February 1999, 10 December 1999, 19 January 2001 and 15 December 2004.
Pomoč, dodeljena podjetju Shetland Fish Products iz Sheme za izboljšanje ribiške tovarne, ni združljiva s skupnim trgom, kar zadeva pomoč v višini 92007 GBP, dodeljeno 13. avgusta 1997, 7. januarja 1999, 25. februarja 1999, 10. decembra 1999, 19. januarja 2001 in 15. decembra 2004.
Individual aid referred to in Article 1(2) of this Decision does not constitute aid if it fulfils the conditions of Regulation (EC) No 875/2007.
Posamezna pomoč iz člena 1(2) te odločbe ne pomeni pomoči, če izpolnjuje pogoje iz (ES) št. 875/2007.
The United Kingdom shall recover the incompatible aid granted under the scheme referred to in Article 1(2) from the beneficiary, other than that referred to in Article 2.
Združeno kraljestvo vrne nezdružljivo pomoč, dodeljeno na podlagi sheme iz člena 1(2), od upravičenca, razen pomoči iz člena 2.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiaries until their actual recovery.
Za zneske, ki jih je treba vrniti, se od datuma, ko so bili dani na razpolago upravičencem, do datuma dejanskega vračila zaračunavajo obresti.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Obresti je treba izračunati z obrestnoobrestnim računom v skladu s poglavjem V (ES) št. 794/2004.
The United Kingdom shall cancel all outstanding payments of aid under the scheme referred to in Article 1(2) with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Združeno kraljestvo prekliče vsa neporavnana plačila pomoči na podlagi sheme iz člena 1(2) z začetkom od datuma sprejetja te odločbe.
total amount (principal and interests) to be recovered from the beneficiary that does not fulfil the conditions laid down by Regulation (EC) No 875/2007;
skupni znesek (glavnica in obresti), ki ga mora vrniti upravičenec, ki ne izpolnjuje pogojev iz Uredbe (ES) št. 875/2007;
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision; and
podroben opis že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepov za uskladitev s to odločbo ter
documents demonstrating that the beneficiary has been ordered to repay the aid.
dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da je bilo upravičencu naročeno, naj vrne pomoč.
The United Kingdom shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid granted under the scheme referred to in Article 1(2) has been completed.
Združeno kraljestvo obvešča Komisijo o napredku glede sprejetih nacionalnih ukrepov za izvajanje te odločbe, dokler se vračanje pomoči, dodeljene na podlagi sheme iz člena 1(2), ne konča.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiary.
Prav tako predloži podrobne podatke o zneskih pomoči in obrestnih merah za vračilo pomoči, ki jih je upravičenec že vrnil.
OJ C 289, 28.11.2006, p. 10.
UL C 289, 28.11.2006, str. 10.
According to the second paragraph of point 5.3 of those Guidelines: ‘An “unlawful aid” within the meaning of Article 1(f) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 will be appraised in accordance with the guidelines applicable at the time when the administrative act setting up the aid has entered into force.’ The aid thus needs to be assessed on the basis of its compatibility with the Guidelines for the examination of State aid to fisheries and aquaculture [9] of 1997 (‘1997 Guidelines’) and the Guidelines for the examination of State aid to fisheries and aquaculture [10] of 2001 (‘2001 Guidelines’).
Po drugem odstavku točke 5.3 navedenih smernic: „‚Nezakonita pomoč‘ po členu 1(f) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999 se oceni v skladu s smernicami, ki so se uporabljale takrat, ko je začel veljati upravni akt o ustanovitvi pomoči.“ Tako je treba to pomoč oceniti na osnovi združljivosti s Smernicami za pregled državnih pomoči za ribištvo in ribogojstvo [9] iz leta 1997 („smernice iz leta 1997“) in Smernicami za pregled državnih pomoči za ribištvo in ribogojstvo [10] iz leta 2001 („smernice iz leta 2001“).
establishing a list of embryo collection and production teams in third countries approved for imports of bovine embryos into the Community
o uvedbi seznama skupin za zbiranje in skupin za proizvodnjo zarodkov v tretjih državah, odobrenih za uvoz govejih zarodkov v Skupnost
(notified under document number C(2008) 517)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 517)
Directive 89/556/EEC sets out the animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in and importation from third countries of fresh and frozen embryos of domestic animals of the bovine species.
Direktiva 89/556/EGS določa pogoje zdravstvenega varstva živali, ki se uporabljajo za trgovino s svežimi in zamrznjenimi zarodki domačega goveda in njihov uvoz iz tretjih držav.
Commission Decision 92/452/EEC of 30 July 1992 establishing lists of embryo collection teams and embryo production teams approved in third countries for export of bovine embryos to the Community [2] provides that Member States are to import embryos from third countries only if they have been collected, processed and stored by embryo collection teams included in the lists in the Annex to that Decision.
Odločba Komisije 92/452/EGS z dne 30. julija 1992 o uvedbi seznamov odobrenih skupin za zbiranje in proizvodnjo govejih zarodkov v tretjih državah za izvoz v Skupnost [2] določa, da države članice uvažajo zarodke iz tretjih držav samo, če so jih zbrale, pripravile in skladiščile skupine za zbiranje zarodkov s seznamov v Prilogi k navedeni odločbi.
Commission Decision 2006/168/EC of 4 January 2006 establishing the animal health and veterinary certification requirements for imports into the Community of bovine embryos and repealing Decision 2005/217/EC [3] provides that Member States are to authorise imports of embryos of domestic animals of the bovine species collected or produced in a third country listed in Annex I to that Decision by approved embryo collection or production teams listed in the Annex to Decision 92/452/EEC.
Odločba Komisije 2006/168/ES z dne 4. januarja 2006 o uvedbi zahtev za zdravstveno varstvo živali in izdajanje veterinarskih spričeval za uvoz govejih zarodkov v Skupnost ter razveljavitvi Odločbe 2005/217/ES [3] določa, da lahko države članice odobrijo uvoz zarodkov domačega goveda, ki so jih zbrale ali proizvedle odobrene skupine za zbiranje in proizvodnjo zarodkov s seznama v Prilogi k Odločbi 92/452/EGS v tretji državi s seznama v Prilogi I k navedeni odločbi.
New Zealand has requested that one embryo collection team be deleted from the list in the Annex to Decision 92/452/EEC, as regards the entries for that third country.
Nova Zelandija je zahtevala, da se s seznama v Prilogi k Odločbi 92/452/EGS glede vnosov za navedeno tretjo državo črta ena skupina za zbiranje zarodkov.
Argentina, Australia, Canada, Switzerland and the United States have also requested that numerous amendments be made to the entries for those third countries in the list in the Annex to Decision 92/452/EEC, as regards certain embryo collection and production teams.
Argentina, Avstralija, Kanada, Švica in Združene države Amerike so tudi zahtevale številne spremembe vnosov za nekatere skupine za zbiranje in proizvodnjo zarodkov za navedene tretje države na seznamu v Prilogi k Odločbi 92/452/EGS.
They have also provided guarantees with regard to compliance with the appropriate rules set out in Directive 89/556/EEC for the teams to be added to that list.
Zagotovile so jamstva glede izpolnjevanja ustreznih pravil iz Direktive 89/556/EGS za skupine, ki se dodajo na navedeni seznam.
The embryo collection and production teams listed in the Annex to this Decision fulfil the conditions relating to the collection, processing, storage and transport of embryos set out in Directive 89/556/EEC.
Skupine za zbiranje in proizvodnjo zarodkov, naštete v Prilogi k tej odločbi, izpolnjujejo pogoje glede zbiranja, priprave, skladiščenja in prevoza zarodkov iz Direktive 89/556/EGS.
They have been approved by the competent authorities of those third countries as referred to in that Directive.
Pristojni organi navedenih tretjih držav so jih odobrili v skladu z navedeno direktivo.
In the interest of clarity of Community legislation, Decision 92/452/EEC should be repealed and replaced by this Decision.
Zaradi jasnosti zakonodaje Skupnosti je treba Odločbo 92/452/EGS razveljaviti in nadomestiti s to odločbo.
Member States shall authorise imports of embryos of domestic animals of the bovine species from third countries only if they have been collected, processed and stored by an embryo collection team or an embryo production team included in the list in the Annex to this Decision.
Države članice odobrijo uvoz zarodkov domačega goveda iz tretjih držav samo, če jih je zbrala, pripravila in skladiščila skupina za zbiranje ali skupina za pridobivanje zarodkov, vključena na seznam v Prilogi k tej odločbi.
Decision 92/452/EEC is repealed.
Odločba 92/452/EGS se razveljavi.
Done at Brussels, 14 February 2008.
V Bruslju, 14. februarja 2008
Decision as last amended by Decision 2007/752/EC (OJ L 304, 22.11.2007, p. 36).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2007/752/ES (UL L 304, 22.11.2007, str. 36).
OJ L 57, 28.2.2006, p. 19.
UL L 57, 28.2.2006, str. 19.
List of embryo collection and production teams in third countries approved for imports of bovine embryos into the Community
Seznam skupin za zbiranje in skupin za proizvodnjo zarodkov v tretjih državah, odobrenih za uvoz govejih zarodkov v Skupnost
Team veterinarian
Veterinar – vodja skupine
Collection team
Skupina za zbiranje
Production team
Skupina za proizvodnjo
amending Decision 2006/766/EC as regards the list of third countries and territories from which imports of fishery products in any form for human consumption are permitted
o spremembi Odločbe 2006/766/ES glede seznama tretjih držav in ozemelj, iz katerih je dovoljen uvoz ribiških proizvodov v kateri koli obliki za prehrano ljudi
(notified under document number C(2008) 555)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 555)
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption [1], and in particular Article 11(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 854/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o določitvi posebnih predpisov za organizacijo uradnega nadzora proizvodov živalskega izvora, namenjenih za prehrano ljudi [1], in zlasti člena 11(1) Uredbe,
Article 11 of that Regulation provides for the establishment of lists of third countries and parts of third countries from which imports of specific products of animal origin are permitted, and sets out criteria to be taken into account in the establishment of such lists.
Člen 11 navedene uredbe predvideva oblikovanje seznamov tretjih držav ali delov tretjih držav, iz katerih je dovoljen uvoz posebnih proizvodov živalskega izvora, ter določa merila, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri oblikovanju takšnih seznamov.
Commission Decision 2006/766/EC of 6 November 2006 establishing the lists of third countries and territories from which imports of bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates, marine gastropods and fishery products are permitted [2] lists those third countries which satisfy the criteria referred to in Article 11(4) of Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 and are therefore able to guarantee that those products exported to the Community meet the sanitary conditions laid down to protect the health of consumers.
Odločba Komisije 2006/766/ES z dne 6. novembra 2006 o določitvi seznamov tretjih držav in ozemelj, iz katerih je dovoljen uvoz školjk, iglokožcev, plaščarjev, morskih polžev in ribiških proizvodov [2], vsebuje seznam tretjih držav, ki izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 11(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 854/2004 in zato lahko jamčijo, da navedeni proizvodi, izvoženi v Skupnost, izpolnjujejo predpisane sanitarne pogoje za varovanje zdravja potrošnikov.
Annex II of that Decision lists the third countries and territories from which imports of fishery products in any form for human consumption are permitted.
Priloga II navedene odločbe vsebuje seznam tretjih držav in ozemelj, iz katerih je dovoljen uvoz ribiških proizvodov v kateri koli obliki za prehrano ljudi.
Armenia is currently listed in that Annex but only for imports of ‘live non-farmed crayfish’.
Armenija je trenutno uvrščena na seznam v navedeni prilogi, vendar samo za žive, negojene sladkovodne rake.
A Commission inspection carried out in that country in March 2007 showed that the relevant sanitary requirements for heat-processed and frozen non-farmed crayfish are met.
Pregled, ki ga je Komisija opravila v navedeni državi marca 2007, je pokazal, da so izpolnjene ustrezne sanitarne zahteve za toplotno obdelane in zamrznjene negojene sladkovodne rake.
Therefore, the listing for Armenia should be extended to also include heat processed non-farmed crayfish and frozen non-farmed crayfish.
Zato je treba seznam za Armenijo razširiti, da bo vključeval tudi toplotno obdelane negojene sladkovodne rake in zamrznjene negojene sladkovodne rake.
Montenegro, which is currently listed in Annex II to Decision 2006/766/EC but only for imports of ‘whole fresh fish from wild seawater catches’, has provided scientific information and submitted an additional application for the approval of imports of freshwater crayfish from that third country.
Črna gora, ki je trenutno uvrščena na seznam v Prilogi II k Odločbi 2006/766/ES, vendar samo za uvoz „sveže ulovljenih celih morskih rib“, je predložila znanstvene informacije in dodatni zahtevek za odobritev uvoza sladkovodnih rakov iz navedene tretje države.
The current limitation should therefore be deleted.
Zato je treba trenutno omejitev črtati.
Imports of fishery products should be authorised.
Dovoliti je treba uvoz ribiških proizvodov.
Bosnia and Herzegovina is currently not listed in Annex II to Decision 2006/766/EC.
Bosna in Hercegovina trenutno ni uvrščena na seznam v Prilogi II k Odločbi 2006/766/ES.
A Commission inspection to that country was carried out from 29 August to 2 September 2005.
Komisija je opravila pregled v navedeni državi med 29. avgustom in 2. septembrom 2005.
It has been proven that the competent authorities have provided all necessary guarantees to satisfy the relevant sanitary conditions.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so pristojni organi zagotovili vsa potrebna jamstva za izpolnitev ustreznih sanitarnih pogojev.
Bosnia and Herzegovina should therefore be included in the list of third countries from which Member States may authorise imports of fishery products.
Zato je treba Bosno in Hercegovino vključiti na seznam tretjih držav, iz katerih lahko države članice dovolijo uvoz ribiških proizvodov.
Bulgaria and Romania are currently listed in Annex II to Decision 2006/766/EC.
Bolgarija in Romunija sta trenutno uvrščeni na seznam v Prilogi II k Odločbi 2006/766/ES.
However, as the list refers only to third countries, the application of those entries ceased upon their accession to the European Union.
Vendar ker seznam zadeva le tretje države, se je veljavnost navedenih vnosov z njunim pristopom k Evropski uniji končala.
The listings for those two Member States should therefore be deleted.
Zato je treba vnosa za navedeni državi članici črtati.
Annex I of that Decision lists the third countries from which imports of bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods in any form for human consumption are permitted.
Priloga I navedene odločbe vsebuje seznam tretjih držav, iz katerih je dovoljen uvoz školjk, iglokožcev, plaščarjev in morskih polžev v kateri koli obliki za prehrano ljudi.
Footnote 6 of Annex II referring to Morocco concerns additional requirements for certain processed bivalve molluscs.
Opomba 6 za Maroko v Prilogi II zadeva dodatne zahteve za nekatere predelane školjke.