natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As this Directive concerns services offered to the general public in the European Union, it should apply only to audiovisual media services that can be received directly or indirectly by the public in one or more Member States with standard consumer equipment.
Ker ta direktiva zadeva storitve, zagotovljene splošni javnosti v Evropski uniji, bi se morala uporabljati le za avdiovizualne medijske storitve, do katerih lahko javnost dostopa neposredno ali posredno s standardno potrošniško opremo v več državah članicah.
The definition of ‘standard consumer equipment’ should be left to the competent national authorities.
Opredelitev pojma „standardne potrošniške opreme“ je treba prepustiti pristojnim nacionalnim organom.
Articles 43 to 48 of the Treaty lay down the fundamental right to freedom of establishment.
Členi 43 do 48 Pogodbe določajo temeljno pravico do svobode ustanavljanja.
Therefore, media service providers should in general be free to choose the Member States in which they establish themselves.
Zato bi morali biti ponudniki medijskih storitev načeloma svobodni pri izberi države članice, v kateri imajo sedež.
The Court of Justice has also emphasised that ‘the Treaty does not prohibit an undertaking from exercising the freedom to provide services if it does not offer services in the Member State in which it is established’ [17].
Sodišče je poudarilo tudi, da „Pogodba ne prepoveduje podjetju, da uveljavlja pravico do opravljanja storitev, če ne ponuja storitev v državi članici, v kateri ima sedež“ [17].
Member States should be able to apply more detailed or stricter rules in the fields coordinated by this Directive to media service providers under their jurisdiction, while ensuring that those rules are consistent with general principles of Community law.
Državam članicam bi moralo biti omogočeno, da na področjih, ki jih usklajuje ta direktiva, za ponudnike avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev v svoji pristojnosti uporabijo podrobnejša ali strožja pravila, pri tem pa zagotovijo, da so ta pravila v skladu s splošnimi načeli prava Skupnosti.
In order to deal with situations where a broadcaster under the jurisdiction of one Member State provides a television broadcast which is wholly or mostly directed towards the territory of another Member State, a requirement for Member States to cooperate with one another and, in cases of circumvention, the codification of the case-law of the Court of Justice [18], combined with a more efficient procedure, would be an appropriate solution that takes account of Member State concerns without calling into question the proper application of the country of origin principle.
Za ureditev primerov, v katerih izdajatelj televizijskega programa pod pristojnostjo ene države članice razširja televizijske programe, ki so v celoti ali večinoma usmerjene na ozemlje druge države članice, bi bila zahteva po sodelovanju med državami članicami, v primeru izmikanja pa kodifikacija sodne prakse Sodišča [18] skupaj z učinkovitejšim postopkom, primerna rešitev, saj bi upoštevala pomisleke držav članic in ne bi spodbijala ustrezne uporabe načela države izvora.
The notion of rules of general public interest has been developed by the Court of Justice in its case law in relation to Articles 43 and 49 of the Treaty and includes, inter alia, rules on the protection of consumers, the protection of minors and cultural policy.
Pojem pravil splošnega javnega interesa je oblikovalo Sodišče v svoji sodni praksi v zvezi s členoma 43 in 49 Pogodbe in med drugim zajema pravila o varstvu potrošnikov, varstvu mladoletnikov in kulturni politiki.
The Member State requesting cooperation should ensure that the specific national rules in question are objectively necessary, applied in a non-discriminatory manner, and proportionate.
Država članica, ki zahteva sodelovanje, bi morala zagotoviti, da so posebna nacionalna pravila objektivno potrebna, se uporabljajo na nediskriminatoren način in so sorazmerna.
A Member State, when assessing on a case-by-case basis whether a broadcast by a media service provider established in another Member State is wholly or mostly directed towards its territory, may refer to indicators such as the origin of the television advertising and/or subscription revenues, the main language of the service or the existence of programmes or commercial communications targeted specifically at the public in the Member State where they are received.
Država članica se lahko pri ugotavljanju v posameznih primerih, ali ponudnik medijskih storitev, ki ima sedež v drugi državi članici, razširja televizijske programe v celoti ali večinoma na njeno ozemlje, opre na merila, kakršna so izvor televizijskega oglaševanja in/ali dohodki iz naročnine, glavni jezik storitve ali obstoj programov ali komercialnih sporočil, posebej namenjenih javnosti v državi članici, kjer se predvajajo.
Under this Directive, notwithstanding the application of the country of origin principle, Member States may still take measures that restrict freedom of movement of television broadcasting, but only under the conditions and following the procedure laid down in this Directive.
V skladu s to direktivo, ne glede na uporabo načela države izvora, lahko države članice še naprej sprejemajo ukrepe, ki omejujejo prost pretok razširjanja televizijskih programov, vendar le pod pogoji in v skladu s postopkom, določnimi v tej direktivi.
However, the Court of Justice has consistently held that any restriction on the freedom to provide services, such as any derogation from a fundamental principle of the Treaty, must be interpreted restrictively [19].
Vendar je treba v skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso Sodišča vsako omejitev prostega pretoka storitev, kakršno je denimo vsako odstopanje od temeljnega načela Pogodbe, razlagati omejujoče [19].
With respect to on-demand audiovisual media services, restrictions on their free provision should only be possible in accordance with conditions and procedures replicating those already established by Articles 3(4), (5) and (6) of Directive 2000/31/EC.
Ob upoštevanju avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev na zahtevo bi morale biti omejitve njihove brezplačne zagotovitve mogoče le v skladu s pogoji in postopki, ki so enaki tistim, ki so že določeni v členih 3(4), (5) in (6) Direktive 2000/31/ES.
In its Communication to the European Parliament and the Council on Better Regulation for Growth and Jobs in the European Union, the Commission stressed that a careful analysis of the appropriate regulatory approach is necessary, in particular, in order to establish whether legislation is preferable for the relevant sector and problem, or whether alternatives such as co-regulation or self-regulation should be considered.
V Sporočilu Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o bolje oblikovanih predpisih za rast in delovna mesta v Evropski uniji je Komisija poudarila, da je treba predvideti podrobno analizo o ustreznem pristopu oblikovanja predpisov, zlasti glede tega, ali je za zadevni sektor in problem primernejša zakonodaja ali druge možnosti, kakršne so koregulacija ali samoregulacija.
Furthermore, experience has shown that both co- and self-regulation instruments, implemented in accordance with the different legal traditions of the Member States, can play an important role in delivering a high level of consumer protection.
Poleg tega so izkušnje pokazale, da imajo lahko tako instrumenti koregulacije kakor tudi samoregulacije v skladu z raznimi pravnimi tradicijami držav članic pomembno vlogo pri doseganju visoke ravni varstva potrošnikov.
Measures aimed at achieving public interest objectives in the emerging audiovisual media services sector are more effective if they are taken with the active support of the service providers themselves.
Ukrepi za dosego ciljev javnega interesa na področju novo nastajajočih avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev so učinkovitejši, če se izvajajo z aktivno podporo samih ponudnikov storitev.
Thus self-regulation constitutes a type of voluntary initiative which enables economic operators, social partners, non-governmental organisations or associations to adopt common guidelines amongst themselves and for themselves.
Samoregulacija tako predstavlja obliko prostovoljne pobude, ki gospodarskim subjektom, socialnim partnerjem in nevladnim organizacijam ali združenjem omogoča, da med seboj in zase sprejmejo splošne smernice.
Member States should, in accordance with their different legal traditions, recognise the role which effective self-regulation can play as a complement to the legislative and judicial and/or administrative mechanisms in place and its useful contribution to the achievement of the objectives of this Directive.
Države članice bi morale v skladu s svojimi različnimi pravnimi tradicijami priznati učinkovito vlogo, ki jo lahko ima učinkovita samoregulacija kot dodatek obstoječim zakonodajnim in sodnim in/ali upravnim mehanizmom, ter njen koristen prispevek k doseganju ciljev te direktive.
However, while self-regulation might be a complementary method of implementing certain provisions of this Directive, it should not constitute a substitute for the obligations of the national legislator.
Vendar je samoregulacija lahko le dodaten način za izvajanje nekaterih določb te direktive in ne more nadomestiti obveznosti nacionalnega zakonodajalca.
Co-regulation gives, in its minimal form, a legal link between self-regulation and the national legislator in accordance with the legal traditions of the Member States.
Koregulacija v svoji minimalni obliki predstavlja pravno povezavo med samoregulacijo in nacionalnim zakonodajalcem v skladu s pravno tradicijo držav članic.
Co-regulation should allow for the possibility of State intervention in the event of its objectives not being met.
Koregulacija bi morala še naprej dopuščati možnost posredovanja države, če njeni cilji ne bi bili izpolnjeni.
Without prejudice to Member States’ formal obligations regarding transposition, this Directive encourages the use of co-regulation and self-regulation.
Brez poseganja v formalne obveznosti držav članic v zvezi s prenosom ta direktiva spodbuja uporabo koregulacije in samoregulacije.
This should neither oblige Member States to set up co- and/or self-regulatory regimes nor disrupt or jeopardise current co- or self-regulatory initiatives which are already in place within Member States and which are working effectively.
To ne obvezuje držav članic niti k vzpostavitvi koregulativnih in/ali samoregulativnih ureditev niti ne posega ali ogroža sedanjih koregulativnih ali samoregulativnih pobud, ki so že vzpostavljene v državah članicah in učinkovito delujejo.
‘Media literacy’ refers to skills, knowledge and understanding that allow consumers to use media effectively and safely.
„Medijska pismenost“se nanaša na spretnosti, znanje in razumevanje, ki uporabnikom omogočajo učinkovito in varno rabo medijev.
Media-literate people are able to exercise informed choices, understand the nature of content and services and take advantage of the full range of opportunities offered by new communications technologies.
Medijsko pismene osebe so sposobne ozaveščeno izbirati in razumeti značilnosti vsebine in storitev ter v polnem obsegu izkoristijo priložnosti, ki jih omogočajo nove komunikacijske tehnologije.
They are better able to protect themselves and their families from harmful or offensive material.
Sebe in svojo družino so sposobni bolje zaščititi pred škodljivim in žaljivim gradivom.
Therefore the development of media literacy in all sections of society should be promoted and its progress followed closely.
Zato bi bilo treba spodbujati medijsko opismenjevanje v vseh družbenih plasteh in pozorno spremljati njegov napredek.
The Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the protection of minors and human dignity and on the right of reply in relation to the competitiveness of the European audiovisual and on-line information services industry [20] already contains a series of possible measures for promoting media literacy such as, for example, continuing education of teachers and trainers, specific Internet training aimed at children from a very early age, including sessions open to parents, or organisation of national campaigns aimed at citizens, involving all communications media, to provide information on using the Internet responsibly.(38) Television broadcasting rights for events of high interest to the public may be acquired by broadcasters on an exclusive basis.
Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o varstvu mladoletnikov in človeškega dostojanstva ter o pravici do odgovora v zvezi s konkurenčnostjo evropske avdiovizualne industrije in industrije spletnih informacijskih storitev [20] že vsebuje sklop možnih ukrepov za spodbujanje medijske pismenosti, kakor je denimo trajno izobraževanje učiteljev in mentorjev, posebno poučevanje o internetu za otroke že od malega naprej, vključno z odprtimi učnimi urami za starše, ali organiziranje nacionalnih kampanj za državljane, ki vključujejo vsa komunikacijska sredstva, da se zagotovijo informacije o odgovorni uporabi interneta.(38) Izdajatelji televizijskega programa lahko pridobijo ekskluzivne pravice za televizijsko razširjanje dogodkov velikega javnega interesa.
However, it is essential to promote pluralism through the diversity of news production and programming across the European Union and to respect the principles recognised by Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Kljub temu je nujno treba spodbujati pluralnost z različno produkcijo in pripravo informativnih oddaj v Evropski uniji ter spoštovati načela iz člena 11 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije.
In order to safeguard the fundamental freedom to receive information and to ensure that the interests of viewers in the European Union are fully and properly protected, those exercising exclusive television broadcasting rights to an event of high interest to the public should grant other broadcasters the right to use short extracts for the purposes of general news programmes on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms taking due account of exclusive rights.
Zaradi zaščite temeljne pravice do prejemanja informacij in zagotavljanja celostnega in ustreznega varstva interesov gledalcev v Evropski uniji, bi morali izdajatelji, ki imajo ekskluzivne pravice za televizijsko razširjanje dogodka velikega javnega interesa, dovoliti drugim izdajateljem televizijskega programa, da uporabijo kratke izseke za namene priprave splošnega informativnega programa, in sicer na podlagi pravičnih, razumnih in nediskriminatornih pogojev ob upoštevanju ekskluzivnih pravic.
Such terms should be communicated in a timely manner before the event of high interest to the public takes place to give others sufficient time to exercise such a right.
Takšne pogoje je treba pravočasno sporočiti pred dogodkom velikega javnega interesa, da imajo drugi dovolj časa za uveljavljanje takšne pravice.
A broadcaster should be able to exercise this right through an intermediary acting specifically on its behalf on a case-by-case basis.
Izdajatelj televizijskega programa bi moral imeti možnost, da lahko to pravico uveljavlja od primera do primera prek posrednika, ki deluje izrecno v njegovem imenu.
Such short extracts may be used for EU-wide broadcasts by any channel including dedicated sports channels and should not exceed 90 seconds.
Takšne kratke izseke, ki ne bi smeli presegati 90 sekund, v programskih vsebinah po celotni EU lahko uporabljajo vsi kanali, vključno s športnimi kanali.
The right of access to short extracts should apply on a trans-frontier basis only where it is necessary.
Pravica čezmejnega dostopa do kratkih izsekov naj bi se uporabljala le, če je to potrebno.
Therefore a broadcaster should first seek access from a broadcaster established in the same Member State having exclusive rights to the event of high interest to the public.
Zato bi moral izdajatelj televizijskega programa najprej zaprositi za dostop drugega izdajatelja televizijskega programa, ki ima sedež v isti državi članici in je imetnik ekskluzivnih pravic za prenašanje dogodka velikega javnega interesa.
The notion of general news programmes should not cover the compilation of short extracts into programmes serving entertainment purposes.
Pojem splošnih informativnih oddaj ne bi smel vključevati razvedrilnih programov, ki so sestavljeni iz kratkih izsekov.
The country of origin principle should apply to both the access to, and the transmission of, the short extracts.
Načelo države izvora bi se moralo uporabljati tako za dostop kakor tudi za prenos kratkih izsekov.
In a trans-frontier case, this means that the different laws should be applied sequentially.
V čezmejnih primerih to pomeni, da bi se zaporedoma uporabile različne zakonodaje.
Firstly, for access to the short extracts the law of the Member State where the broadcaster supplying the initial signal (i.e. giving access) is established should apply.
Najprej bi se za dostop do kratkih izsekov uporabila zakonodaja države članice, kjer ima sedež izdajatelj televizijskega programa, ki oddaja prvi signal (tj. omogoča dostop).
This is usually the Member State in which the event concerned takes place.
To je običajno država članica, v kateri se zadevni dogodek odvija.
Where a Member State has established an equivalent system of access to the event concerned, the law of that Member State should apply in any case.
Če je država članica vzpostavila enakovreden sistem dostopa do zadevnega dogodka, bi se v vsakem primeru morala uporabiti zakonodaja te države članice.
Secondly, for transmission of the short extracts, the law of the Member State where the broadcaster transmitting the short extracts is established should apply.
Nadalje bi se morala za prenos kratkih izsekov uporabiti zakonodaja države članice, kjer ima sedež izdajatelj televizijskega programa, ki te kratke izseke prenaša.
The requirements of this Directive regarding access to events of high interest to the public for the purpose of short news reports should be without prejudice to Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society [21] and the relevant international conventions in the field of copyright and neighbouring rights.
Zahteve te direktive glede dostopa do dogodkov velikega javnega interesa za namen kratkega poročanja ne bi smele posegati v Direktivo 2001/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. maja 2001 o usklajevanju določenih vidikov avtorske in sorodnih pravic v informacijski družbi [21] in v ustrezne mednarodne konvencije s področja avtorskih in sorodnih pravic.
Member States should facilitate access to events of high interests to the public by granting access to the broadcaster’s signal within the meaning of this Directive.
Države članice bi morale olajševati dostop do dogodkov velikega javnega interesa z odobritvijo dostopa do signala izdajatelja televizijskega programa v smislu te direktive.
However, they may choose other equivalent means within the meaning of this Directive.
Vendar pa lahko izberejo druge enakovredne načine v smislu te direktive.
Such means include, inter alia, granting access to the venue of these events prior to granting access to the signal.
Takšni načini med drugim vključujejo odobritev dostopa do kraja teh dogodkov pred odobritvijo dostopa do signala.
Broadcasters should not be prevented from concluding more detailed contracts.
Izdajateljem televizijskih programov ne bi smelo biti preprečeno sklepati podrobnejše pogodbe.
It should be ensured that the practice of media service providers of providing their live television broadcast news programmes in the on-demand mode after live transmission is still possible without having to tailor the individual programme by omitting the short extracts.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba, da bodo ponudniki medijskih storitev še naprej lahko zagotavljali poznejše predvajanje informativnih programov v obliki storitve na zahtevo po neposrednem prenosu, ne da bi morali pri tem prilagoditi posamezne programe, z izpuščanjem kratkih izsekov.
This possibility should be restricted to the on-demand supply of the identical television broadcast programme by the same media service provider, so it may not be used to create new on-demand business models based on short extracts.
Ta možnost bi morala biti omejena na razširjanje istega televizijskega programa s strani istega ponudnika medijskih storitev na zahtevo, zato je ni dovoljeno uporabiti za uvedbo novih poslovnih modelov na zahtevo na podlagi kratkih izsekov.
On-demand audiovisual media services are different from television broadcasting with regard to the choice and control the user can exercise, and with regard to the impact they have on society [22].
Avdiovizualne medijske storitve na zahtevo se razlikujejo od razširjanja televizijskih programov po izbiri in nadzoru, ki ju ima uporabnik, ter po vplivu, ki ga imajo na družbo [22].
This justifies imposing lighter regulation on on-demand audiovisual media services, which should comply only with the basic rules provided for in this Directive.
To upravičuje manj strogo ureditev avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev na zahtevo, ki morajo biti skladne zgolj z osnovnimi pravili iz te direktive.
Because of the specific nature of audiovisual media services, especially the impact of these services on the way people form their opinions, it is essential for users to know exactly who is responsible for the content of these services.
Zaradi posebne narave avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev, zlasti vpliva teh storitev na to, kako si ljudje oblikujejo mnenje, je nujno, da uporabniki natančno vedo, kdo je odgovoren za vsebino teh storitev.
It is therefore important for Member States to ensure that users have easy and direct access at any time to information about the media service provider.
Zato je pomembno, da države članice zagotovijo, da imajo uporabniki stalen, enostaven in neposreden dostop do informacij o ponudniku medijske storitve.
It is for each Member State to decide the practical details as to how this objective can be achieved without prejudice to any other relevant provisions of Community law.
Vsaka država članica določi praktične podrobnosti o načinu izpolnjevanja tega cilja brez poseganja v katere koli druge ustrezne določbe prava Skupnosti.
The availability of harmful content in audiovisual media services continues to be a concern for legislators, the media industry and parents.
Zakonodajalce, industrijo in starše še vedno skrbi dostop do škodljivih vsebin pri avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah.
There will also be new challenges, especially in connection with new platforms and new products.
Pojavili se bodo tudi novi izzivi, zlasti v zvezi z novimi platformami in novimi izdelki.
It is therefore necessary to introduce rules to protect the physical, mental and moral development of minors as well as human dignity in all audiovisual media services, including audiovisual commercial communications.
Zato je treba uvesti pravila za zaščito duševnega, moralnega in telesnega razvoja mladoletnikov ter človekovega dostojanstva pri vseh avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah, vključno z avdiovizualnimi komercialnimi sporočili.
Measures taken to protect the physical, mental and moral development of minors and human dignity should be carefully balanced with the fundamental right to freedom of expression as laid down in the Charter on Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Ukrepi, sprejeti za zaščito telesnega, mentalnega in moralnega razvoja mladoletnikov in za zaščito človekovega dostojanstva, bi morali biti pazljivo usklajeni s temeljno pravico do svobode izražanja, kot je določena v Listini o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije.