natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In view of the factors examined in recitals 9 to 13, the condition of direct exposure to competition laid down in Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC should be considered to be met in respect of production of electricity in Austria.
Glede na dejavnike iz uvodnih izjav 9 do 13 je treba šteti, da je pogoj glede neposredne izpostavljenosti konkurenci iz člena 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES izpolnjen, kar zadeva proizvodnjo električne energije v Avstriji.
Furthermore, since the condition of unrestricted access to the market is deemed to be met, Directive 2004/17/EC should not apply when contracting entities award contracts intended to enable electricity generation to be carried out in Austria nor when they organise design contests for the pursuit of such an activity in Austria.
Ker se poleg tega zdi, da je pogoj glede neomejenega dostopa do trga izpolnjen, se Direktiva 2004/17/ES ne uporablja, če naročniki oddajo naročila, katerih namen je omogočanje proizvodnje električne energije v Avstriji, ali če se v Avstriji v ta namen organizirajo natečaji.
This Decision is based on the legal and factual situation as of January to February 2008 as it appears from the information submitted by the Republic of Austria, the 2005 Report and the Technical Annex thereto, the 2007 Communication and the 2007 Staff Document as well as the Final Report.
Ta odločba temelji na pravnem in dejanskem stanju iz obdobja od januarja do februarja 2008, kot je razvidno iz informacij Republike Avstrije, poročila iz leta 2005 in tehnične priloge k poročilu, sporočila iz leta 2007 in dokumenta služb iz leta 2007 ter končnega poročila.
It may be revised, should significant changes in the legal or factual situation mean that the conditions for the applicability of Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC are no longer met,
Lahko se spremeni, če bi pomembne spremembe pravnega ali dejanskega stanja pomenile, da pogoji za uporabo člena 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES niso več izpolnjeni –
Directive 2004/17/EC shall not apply to contracts awarded by contracting entities and intended to enable them to carry out electricity generation in Austria.
Direktiva 2004/17/ES se ne uporablja za naročila, ki naročnikom omogočajo proizvodnjo električne energije v Austriji.
Done at Brussels, 7 July 2008.
V Bruslju, 7. julija 2008
Directive as last amended by Directive 2008/3/EC (OJ L 17, 22.1.2008, p. 6).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2008/3/ES (UL L 17, 22.1.2008, str. 6).
See COM(2006) 851 final of 10.1.2007.
Glej COM(2006) 851 konč. z dne 10.1.2007.
Commission Communication: Inquiry pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 into the European gas and electricity sectors, hereinafter referred to as ‘Final Report’, Annex B, point A1, 2).
Sporočilo Komisije: „Preiskava na podlagi člena 17 Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003 v panogi plina in elektroenergetski panogi“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: končno poročilo), Priloga B, točka A1, 2).
See the Final Report, Annex B, point A2, 7.
Glej končno poročilo, Priloga B, točka A2, 7).
The 2005 Report, p. 2.
Poročilo iz leta 2005, str. 2.
Cf. the 2005 Report, p. 7.
Glej poročilo iz leta 2005, str. 7.
Table 6 ‘Wholesale Market Position 2006’, p. 12 of ‘Commission Staff Working Document: Accompanying document to the Report on Progress in Creating the Internal Gas and Electricity Market’, COM(2008) 192 final of 15.4.2008.
Preglednica 6 „Wholesale Market Position 2006“, str. 12 delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije: Spremni dokument k poročilu „Napredek pri oblikovanju notranjega trga plina in električne energije“, COM(2008) 192 konč., 15.4.2008.
23,5 % according to information given by the Austrian authorities.
23,5 % v skladu s podatki, ki so jih posredovali avstrijski organi.
i.e. the quantity of electricity needed for internal consumption and exports.
Tj. količina električne energije, potrebna za notranjo potrošnjo in izvoz.
Commission Staff Working Document, Technical Annex to the 2005 Report, SEC(2005) 1448, hereinafter referred to as ‘Technical Annex’, pp. 67-68.
Delovni dokument služb Komisije, Tehnična priloga k Poročilu iz leta 2005, SEC(2005) 1448 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: tehnična priloga), str. 67–68.
According to the Final Report, paragraph 993, Table 52, the Austrian balancing market operates with a spread of 27, which places it in the lower half as spread in balancing markets in the EU ranges between 0 and 79.
Glede na končno poročilo, odstavek 993, preglednica 52, avstrijski izravnalni trg deluje s cenovno razliko 27, kar ga uvršča v spodnjo polovico, saj je cenovna razlika na izravnalnih trgih v EU v razponu med 0 in 79.
This analysis looks at the effects on electricity generation of the workings of the balancing market and not at the degree of competition within the balancing market itself.
V analizi se proučuje učinke delovanja izravnalnih trgov na proizvodnjo električne energije in ne na stopnjo konkurence na samem izravnalnem trgu.
For this purpose it is therefore unimportant whether a low spread is caused by competition or a price cap imposed by the regulator, just as the elevated concentration on the balancing market is without pertinence in this analysis.
V ta namen zato ni pomembno, ali je nizka cenovna razlika posledica konkurence ali cenovne zgornje meje, ki jo predpiše regulatorni organ; enako velja tudi za povečano koncentracijo na izravnalnem trgu.
2005 Report, p. 9.
Poročilo iz leta 2005, str. 9.
See the document entitled ‘Austria — Internal Market Fact Sheet’, published at http://ec.europa.eu/energy/energy_policy/doc/factsheets/market/market_at_en.pdf, using information from Energie-Control GmbH, 2007.
Glej dokument z naslovom „Austria – Internal Market Fact Sheet“, ki je objavljen na spletni strani http://ec.europa.eu/energy/energy_policy/doc/factsheets/market/market_at_en.pdf in ki temelji na podatkih Energie-Control GmbH, 2007.
Technical Annex p. 107.
Tehnična priloga, str. 107.
If few customers are switching, there is likely to be a problem with the functioning of the market, even if the benefits from the possibility of renegotiating with the historical supplier should not be ignored’ [14].
Če prestopa malo odjemalcev, verjetno obstaja problem pri delovanju trga, čeprav ne smemo pozabiti na koristi, ki jih prinaša možnost ponovnega pogajanja s prejšnjim dobaviteljem“ [14].
Decision No 586/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Odločba št. 586/2008/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Decision No 896/2006/EC establishing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by the Member States of certain residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein for the purpose of transit through their territory
o spremembi Odločbe št. 896/2006/ES o vzpostavitvi poenostavljenega režima kontrole oseb na zunanjih mejah na podlagi enostranskega priznanja določenih dovoljenj za prebivanje, ki jih izdata Švica in Lihtenštajn, s strani držav članic za namen tranzita preko njihovih ozemelj
Decision No 896/2006/EC [2] establishes common rules on unilateral recognition by the Member States of certain residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein allowing a simplified regime for the control at the external borders of third country nationals who hold these documents.
Odločba št. 896/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] določa skupna pravila o enostranskem priznanju določenih dovoljenj za prebivanje, ki jih izdajata Švica in Lihtenštajn, s strani držav članic, kar omogoča poenostavljen režim za kontrole državljanov tretjih držav, ki imajo te dokumente na zunanjih mejah.
As a result of the two-step implementation of the Schengen acquis, those Member States that joined the European Union on 1 May 2004 were required, as from that date, to issue national visas to third country nationals who hold a residence permit issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein and who are subject to a visa obligation under Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement [3].
Na podlagi dvofaznega izvajanja schengenskega pravnega reda morajo države članice, ki so pristopile k Evropski uniji 1. maja 2004, od tega datuma državljanom tretjih držav, ki sta jim Švica ali Lihtenštajn izdala dovoljenje za prebivanje in morajo imeti vizum na podlagi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 539/2001 z dne 15. marca 2001 o seznamu tretjih držav, katerih državljani morajo pri prehodu zunanjih meja imeti vizume, in držav, katerih državljani so oproščeni te zahteve [3], izdati nacionalne vizume.
That requirement created additional administrative burdens on the consulates of those Member States in Switzerland and Liechtenstein.
Ta obveznost je povzročila dodatne upravne obremenitve za konzularna predstavništva teh držav članic v Švici in Lihtenštajnu.
However, it did not appear necessary for Member States to require that category of persons to hold a visa for the purpose of transit, as they represent a low illegal immigration risk for the Member States.
Vendar se državam članicam ni zdelo nujno potrebno, da od te skupine oseb zahtevajo vizum za namene tranzita, saj pomenijo nizko tveganje nezakonitega priseljevanja za države članice.
Considering that the same reasoning applies to Bulgaria and Romania, the simplified regime introduced by Decision No 896/2006/EC should be extended to Bulgaria and Romania.
Glede na to, da enako sklepanje velja za Bolgarijo in Romunijo, bi bilo treba poenostavljeni režim, ki ga uvaja Odločba št. 896/2006/ES, razširiti na Bolgarijo in Romunijo.
Such amendment of Decision No 896/2006/EC should allow Bulgaria and Romania, if they decide to apply Decision No 582/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 introducing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by Bulgaria, Cyprus and Romania of certain documents as equivalent to their national visas for the purposes of transit through their territories [4], to recognise unilaterally the residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein which are listed in the Annex to Decision No 896/2006/EC as equivalent to their national transit visas.
Če se Bolgarija in Romunija odločita za uporabo Odločbe št. 582/2008/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. junija 2008 o uvedbi poenostavljenega režima kontrole oseb na zunanjih mejah na podlagi enostranskega priznanja določenih listin s strani Bolgarije, Cipra in Romunije kot enakovrednih njihovim nacionalnim vizumom za namene tranzita prek njihovih ozemelj [4], bi jima morala takšna sprememba Odločbe št. 896/2006/ES omogočiti enostransko priznanje dovoljenj za prebivanje, ki jih izdajata Švica in Lihtenštajn in so našteta v Prilogi k Odločbi št. 896/2006/ES, kot enakovrednih svojim nacionalnim tranzitnim vizumom.
Recognition should be limited to the purpose of transit through the territory of Bulgaria and Romania and should not affect the possibility for those two Member States to issue visas for short-term stay.
Priznanje bi moralo biti omejeno na namen tranzita preko ozemlja Bolgarije in Romunije in ne bi smelo posegati v možnost teh dveh držav članic, da izdajata vizume za kratkoročno bivanje.
The possibility for Bulgaria and Romania not to apply Decision No 896/2006/EC should be limited to the transitional period until the date to be determined by the Council in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 4(2) of the 2005 Act of Accession.
Možnost, da Bolgarija in Romunija Odločbe št. 896/2006/ES ne uporabita, bi morala biti omejena na prehodno obdobje do datuma, ki ga določi Svet v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 4(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2005.
The entry conditions laid down in Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) [5] have to be fulfilled, with the exception of the condition laid down in Article 5(1)(b) thereof, insofar as this Decision sets up an equivalence regime between transit visas issued by Bulgaria and Romania and certain residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein.
Pogoji za vstop, določeni v členu 5(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 562/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. marca 2006 o Zakoniku Skupnosti o pravilih, ki urejajo gibanje oseb prek meja (Zakonik o schengenskih mejah) [5], morajo biti izpolnjeni, razen pogoja, določenega v členu 5(1)(b) Uredbe, kolikor ta odločba vzpostavlja režim enakovrednosti med tranzitnimi vizumi, ki jih izdajata Bolgarija in Romunija, in določenimi dovoljenji za prebivanje, ki jih izdata Švica in Lihtenštajn.
Since the objective of this Decision cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States as it directly affects the Community acquis on external borders and can therefore, by reason of the scale and effects of the action, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Ker cilja te odločbe države članice same ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, ker neposredno zadeva pravni red Skupnosti o zunanjih mejah in ker ta cilj zaradi obsega in učinkov ukrepa laže doseže Skupnost, lahko Skupnost sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the association of those two States with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [6], which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point (A) of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 [7] on certain arrangements for the application of that Agreement
Kar zadeva Islandijo in Norveško, predstavlja ta odločba nadaljnji razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, v smislu Sporazuma, sklenjenega med Svetom Evropske unije ter Republiko Islandijo in Kraljevino Norveško, o pridružitvi teh dveh držav k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [6], ki spadajo v okvir področja, navedenega v členu 1(A) Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES z dne 17. maja 1999 [7] o nekaterih izvedbenih predpisih za uporabo navedenega sporazuma.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the Position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členi 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in k Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa in zato ta zanjo ni zavezujoč niti ga ni dolžna uporabljati.
Given that this Decision builds upon the Schengen acquis under the provisions of Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark shall, in accordance with Article 5 of the said Protocol, decide within a period of six months after the date of adoption of this Decision whether it will implement it in its national law.
Glede na to, da ta odločba temelji na schengenskem pravnem redu v skladu z določbami iz naslova IV tretjega dela Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, se Danska v skladu s členom 5 navedenega protokola odloči v roku šestih mesecev po sprejetju te odločbe, ali jo bo prenesla v svoje nacionalno pravo.
This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [8]; the United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Ta odločba predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, v katerem Združeno kraljestvo ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/365/ES z dne 29. maja 2000 o prošnji Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [8]. Združeno kraljestvo torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te odločbe in ga ta zato ne zavezuje niti je ni dolžno uporabljati.
This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland’s request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [9].
Ta odločba predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, v katerem Irska ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2002/192/ES z dne 28. februarja 2002 o prošnji Irske za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [9].
Ireland is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application,
Irska torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te odločbe in je ta zato ne zavezuje niti je ni dolžna uporabljati –
The following subparagraph shall be added to Article 2 of Decision No 896/2006/EC:
Členu 2 Odločbe št. 896/2006/ES se doda naslednji pododstavek:
‘If Bulgaria and Romania decide to apply Decision No 582/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 introducing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by Bulgaria, Cyprus and Romania of certain documents as equivalent to their national visas for the purposes of transit through their territories, they may unilaterally recognise the residence permits listed in the Annex to this Decision as equivalent to their national transit visa until the date to be determined by the Council, in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 4(2) of the 2005 Act of Accession.Article 2
„Če se Bolgarija in Romunija odločita uporabljati Odločbo št. 582/2008/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. junija 2008 o uvedbi poenostavljenega režima kontrole oseb na zunanjih mejah na podlagi enostranskega priznanja določenih listin s strani Bolgarije, Cipra in Romunije kot enakovrednih njihovim nacionalnim vizumom za namene tranzita prek njihovih ozemelj, lahko enostransko priznata dovoljenja za prebivanje, našteta v Prilogi k tej odločbi, kot enakovredna svojim tranzitnim vizumom, do datuma, ki ga določi Svet v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 4(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2005.Člen 2
If Bulgaria and Romania decide to apply Decision No 896/2006/EC, they shall notify the Commission thereof within 10 working days of the date of entry into force of this Decision.
Če se Bolgarija in Romunija odločita uporabljati Odločbo št. 896/2006/ES, o tem obvestita Komisijo v 10 delovnih dneh od dneva začetka veljavnosti te odločbe.
The Commission shall publish the information communicated by them in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Komisija objavi njuno naznanilo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
OJ L 167, 20.6.2006, p. 8.
UL L 167, 20.6.2006, str. 8.
OJ L 161, 20.6.2008, p. 30.’
UL L 161, 20.6.2008, str. 30.“
amending Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties
o spremembi Sklepa 94/262/ESPJ, ES, Euratom o pravilih in splošnih pogojih, ki urejajo opravljanje funkcije varuha človekovih pravic
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 195(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 195(4) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 107d(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo in zlasti člena 107d(4) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the draft decision approved by the European Parliament on 22 April 2008 [1] and to the resolution adopted and the amendments approved on 18 June 2008 [2],
ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa, ki ga je Evropski parlament odobril 22. aprila 2008 [1], ter sprejete resolucije in odobrenih sprememb z dne 18. junija 2008 [2],
With the approval of the Council [3],
s soglasjem Sveta [3],
The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union recognises the right to good administration as a fundamental right of citizens of the Union.
Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah priznava pravico do dobrega upravljanja kot temeljno pravico državljanov Unije.
Citizens' confidence in the capacity of the Ombudsman to conduct thorough and impartial inquiries in alleged cases of maladministration is fundamental to the success of the Ombudsman's action.
Zaupanje državljanov v sposobnost varuha človekovih pravic, da vodi temeljite in nepristranske preiskave v domnevnih primerih slabega upravljanja, je bistveno za uspeh dejavnosti varuha človekovih pravic.
It is desirable to adapt the Statute of the Ombudsman in order to eliminate any possible uncertainty concerning the capacity of the Ombudsman to conduct thorough and impartial inquiries in alleged cases of maladministration.
Zaželeno je, da se Statut varuha človekovih pravic prilagodi in tako odpravi kakršna koli morebitna negotovost glede sposobnosti varuha človekovih pravic, da vodi temeljite in nepristranske preiskave v domnevnih primerih slabega upravljanja.
It is desirable to adapt the Statute of the Ombudsman in order to allow for any possible evolution of the legal provisions or of case law concerning the intervention of bodies, offices and agencies of the European Union in cases before the Court of Justice.
Zaželeno je, da se Statut varuha človekovih pravic prilagodi, da bi omogočili morebitni razvoj zakonskih določb ali sodne prakse v zvezi z ukrepanjem organov, pisarn in agencij Evropske unije v primerih pred Sodiščem.
It is desirable to adapt the Statute of the Ombudsman to take account of the changes that have occurred in recent years as regards the role of EU institutions and bodies in combating fraud against the financial interests of the European Union, notably the creation of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), so as to allow the Ombudsman to notify those institutions or bodies of any information falling within their remit.
Zaželeno je, da se Statut varuha človekovih pravic prilagodi, da bi upoštevali spremembe, nastale v zadnjih letih, glede vloge institucij in organov EU v boju proti goljufijam zoper finančne interese Evropske unije, zlasti ustanovitev Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF), in tako omogočili varuhu človekovih pravic, da te institucije ali organe obvesti o vseh informacijah, ki sodijo v njihovo pristojnost.
It is desirable to take steps so as to allow the Ombudsman to develop his or her cooperation with similar institutions at national and international level, as well as with national or international institutions, even where they cover a wider range of activities than the European Ombudsman — such as the protection of human rights — since such cooperation may make a positive contribution towards enhancing the efficiency of the Ombudsman's action.
Zaželeno je, da se sprejmejo ukrepi, da se varuhu človekovih pravic omogoči vzpostavitev sodelovanja s podobnimi institucijami na nacionalni in mednarodni ravni ter z nacionalnimi ali mednarodnimi institucijami, čeprav imajo večje pristojnosti kakor Evropski varuh človekovih pravic, na primer varstvo človekovih pravic, saj bi takšno sodelovanje lahko pozitivno prispevalo k bolj učinkoviti dejavnosti varuha človekovih pravic.
The Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community expired in 2002,
Pogodba o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za premog in jeklo je prenehala veljati leta 2002 –
Amendments to Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom
Spremembe k Sklepu 94/262/ESPJ, ES, Euratom