natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where notice has been given that a contract award procedure has been suspended in accordance with paragraph 3(c), the Member State shall notify the Commission when the suspension is lifted or another contract procedure relating in whole or in part to the same subject matter is begun.
Kjer je bilo dano obvestilo, da je postopek oddaje javnega naročila začasno ustavljen v skladu z odstavkom 3(c), država članica uradno obvesti Komisijo, ko začasna ustavitev preneha ali se začne drugi postopek za oddajo javnega naročila, ki se v celoti ali deloma nanaša na isti predmet.
That notification shall confirm that the alleged infringement has been corrected or include a reasoned submission as to why no correction has been made.’;
To obvestilo potrjuje, da je bila domnevna kršitev odpravljena ali vključuje utemeljene razloge o tem, zakaj ni bila odpravljena.“;
Content of a notice for voluntary ex ante transparency
Vsebina obvestila o prostovoljni predhodni preglednosti
The notice referred to in the second indent of Article 2d(4), the format of which shall be adopted by the Commission in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 3b(2), shall contain the following information:
Obvestilo iz druge alinee člena 2d(4), katerega obliko v skladu s svetovalnim postopkom iz člena 3b(2) sprejme Komisija, vsebuje naslednje podatke:
the name and contact details of the contracting authority;
ime in kontaktne podatke naročnika;
a description of the object of the contract;
opis predmeta naročila;
a justification of the decision of the contracting authority to award the contract without prior publication of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Union;
utemeljitev odločitve naročnika o oddaji naročila brez predhodne objave obvestila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije;
the name and contact details of the economic operator in favour of whom a contract award decision has been taken; and
ime in kontaktne podatke gospodarskega subjekta, v čigar korist je bila sprejeta odločitev o oddaji naročila, in
where appropriate, any other information deemed useful by the contracting authority.
po potrebi vsi drugi podatki, ki se naročniku zdijo koristni.
The Commission shall be assisted by the Advisory Committee for Public Contracts set up by Article 1 of Council Decision 71/306/EEC of 26 July 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the Committee).
Komisiji pomaga Svetovalni odbor za javna naročila, ustanovljen s členom 1 Sklepa Sveta 71/306/EGS z dne 26. julija 1971 (v nadaljevanju ‚Odbor‘).
Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 3 and 7 of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
Pri sklicevanju na ta odstavek se uporabljata člena 3 in 7 Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil, ob upoštevanju določb člena 8 Sklepa.
The Commission may request the Member States, in consultation with the Committee, to provide it with information on the operation of national review procedures.
Komisija lahko po posvetovanju z Odborom od držav članic zahteva, da ji priskrbijo informacije o delovanju nacionalnih revizijskih postopkov.
Member States shall communicate to the Commission on an annual basis the text of all decisions, together with the reasons therefor, taken by their review bodies in accordance with Article 2d(3).’;
Države članice Komisiji letno pošiljajo besedila vseh odločitev, vključno z razlogi zanje, ki jih sprejmejo njihovi revizijski organi v skladu s členom 2d(3).“;
the following article shall be inserted:
vstavi se naslednji člen:
No later than 20 December 2012, the Commission shall review the implementation of this Directive and report to the European Parliament and to the Council on its effectiveness, and in particular on the effectiveness of the alternative penalties and time limits.’.
Najpozneje 20. decembra 2012 Komisija pregleda izvajanje te direktive in poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o njeni učinkovitosti, zlasti o učinkovitosti alternativnih kazni in časovnih omejitev.“.
Amendments to Directive 92/13/EEC
Spremembe Direktive 92/13/EGS
Directive 92/13/EEC is hereby amended as follows:
Direktiva 92/13/EGS se spremeni:
This Directive applies to contracts referred to in Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors, unless such contracts are excluded in accordance with Article 5(2), Articles 18 to 26, Articles 29 and 30 or Article 62 of that Directive.
Ta direktiva se uporablja za javna naročila iz Direktive 2004/17/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov javnih naročil naročnikov v vodnem, energetskem in transportnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev, razen če so takšna naročila izključena v skladu s členom 5(2), členi 18 do 26, členoma 29 in 30 ali členom 62 navedene direktive.
Contracts within the meaning of this Directive include supply, works and service contracts, framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems.
Naročila v smislu te direktive zajemajo javna naročila blaga, gradenj in storitev, okvirne sporazume ter dinamične nabavne sisteme.
Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that, as regards contracts falling within the scope of Directive 2004/17/EC, decisions taken by contracting entities may be reviewed effectively and, in particular, as rapidly as possible in accordance with the conditions set out in Articles 2 to 2f of this Directive, on the grounds that such decisions have infringed Community law in the field of procurement or national rules transposing that law.
Države članice sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe, da se v zvezi z javnimi naročili s področja uporabe Direktive 2004/17/ES zagotovi učinkovita in zlasti čim hitrejša revizija odločitev, ki so jih sprejeli naročniki, skladno s pogoji, določenimi v členih 2 do 2f te direktive, na podlagi obrazložitve, da so takšne odločitve kršile zakonodajo Skupnosti na področju javnih naročil ali nacionalne predpise o prenosu te zakonodaje.
Member States shall ensure that there is no discrimination between undertakings likely to make a claim in respect of harm in the context of a procedure for the award of a contract as a result of the distinction made by this Directive between national rules implementing Community law and other national rules.
Države članice zagotovijo, da razlikovanje, ki ga ta direktiva uvaja med nacionalnimi predpisi za izvajanje prava Skupnosti in med drugimi nacionalnimi predpisi, ne povzroči diskriminacije med podjetji, ki bi utegnila v okviru postopka oddaje javnega naročila uveljavljati škodo.
Member States may require that the person wishing to use a review procedure has notified the contracting entity of the alleged infringement and of his intention to seek review, provided that this does not affect the standstill period in accordance with Article 2a(2) or any other time limits for applying for review in accordance with Article 2c.
Države članice lahko zahtevajo, da mora oseba, ki želi uporabiti revizijski postopek, naročnika obvestiti o domnevni kršitvi in o svoji nameri, da bo zahtevala revizijo, pod pogojem, da to ne vpliva na obdobje mirovanja v skladu s členom 2a(2) oziroma katere koli druge časovne omejitve za vložitev zahtevka za revizijo v skladu s členom 2c.
Member States may require that the person concerned first seek review with the contracting entity.
Države članice lahko zahtevajo, da zadevna oseba revizijo najprej vloži pri naročniku.
The suspension referred to in the first subparagraph shall not end before the expiry of a period of at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contracting entity has sent a reply if fax or electronic means are used, or, if other means of communication are used, before the expiry of a period of either at least 15 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contracting entity has sent a reply or at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date of the receipt of a reply.
Začasna prekinitev iz prvega pododstavka se ne konča pred potekom roka, ki ne sme biti krajši od 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko je naročnik poslal svoj odgovor, če je za to uporabil faks ali elektronska komunikacijska sredstva, oziroma, če so bila uporabljena druga komunikacijska sredstva, pred potekom roka, ki ne sme biti krajši od 15 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko je naročnik poslal svoj odgovor, ali od roka 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu prejema odgovora.
the title ‘Requirements for review procedures’ shall be inserted;
vstavi se naslov „Zahteve za revizijske postopke“;
paragraphs 2 to 4 shall be replaced by the following:
odstavki 2 do 4 se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
When a body of first instance, which is independent of the contracting entity, reviews a contract award decision, Member States shall ensure that the contracting entity cannot conclude the contract before the review body has made a decision on the application either for interim measures or for review.
Če prvostopenjski organ, ki je neodvisen od naročnika, opravi revizijo odločitve o oddaji javnega naročila, države članice zagotovijo, da naročnik ne more skleniti pogodbe, dokler revizijski organ ne sprejme odločitve glede zahtevka za začasne ukrepe ali za revizijo.
A decision not to grant interim measures shall not prejudice any other claim of the person seeking such measures.’;
Odločitev, da se začasni ukrepi ne odobrijo, ne posega v druge zahtevke osebe, ki zahteva takšne ukrepe.“;
Furthermore, except where a decision must be set aside prior to the award of damages, a Member State may provide that, after the conclusion of a contract in accordance with Article 1(5), paragraph 3 of this Article or Articles 2a to 2f, the powers of the body responsible for review procedures shall be limited to awarding damages to any person harmed by an infringement.’;
Poleg tega lahko država članica, razen kadar je treba odločitev razveljaviti pred dodelitvijo nadomestila za škodo, predvidi, da se po sklenitvi pogodbe v skladu s členom 1(5), odstavkom 3 tega člena ali s členi 2a do 2f, pooblastila organa, pristojnega za revizijske postopke, omejijo na dodelitev odškodnine osebam, ki so bile oškodovane zaradi kršitve.“;
in the first subparagraph of paragraph 9, the words ‘court or tribunal within the meaning of Article 177 of the Treaty’ shall be replaced by the words ‘court or tribunal within the meaning of Article 234 of the Treaty’;
v prvem pododstavku odstavka 9 se besede „sodišče v smislu člena 177 Pogodbe“ nadomestijo z besedami „sodišče v smislu člena 234 Pogodbe“;
The Member States shall ensure that the persons referred to in Article 1(3) have sufficient time for effective review of the contract award decisions taken by contracting entities, by adopting the necessary provisions respecting the minimum conditions set out in paragraph 2 of this Article and in Article 2c.
Države članice zagotovijo, da imajo osebe, navedene v členu 1(3), na voljo primerne roke, ki jim zagotavljajo učinkovita pravna sredstva zoper odločitve o oddaji naročila, ki jih sprejmejo naročniki, in sicer tako, da sprejmejo potrebne določbe, ki upoštevajo minimalne pogoje, navedene v odstavku 2 tega člena in v členu 2c.
A contract may not be concluded following the decision to award a contract falling within the scope of Directive 2004/17/EC before the expiry of a period of at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contract award decision is sent to the tenderers and candidates concerned if fax or electronic means are used or, if other means of communication are used, before the expiry of a period of either at least 15 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contract award decision is sent to the tenderers and candidates concerned or at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date of the receipt of the contract award decision.
Do sklenitve pogodbe, ki sledi odločitvi o oddaji javnega naročila s področja uporabe Direktive 2004/17/ES, ne sme priti pred potekom roka, ki ne sme biti krajši od 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko se zadevnim ponudnikom in kandidatom po faksu ali po drugih elektronskih komunikacijskih sredstvih pošlje odločitev o oddaji naročila oziroma, če so bila uporabljena druga komunikacijska sredstva, pred potekom roka, ki ne sme biti krajši od 15 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko je bila zadevnim ponudnikom in kandidatom poslano obvestilo o odločitvi o oddaji naročila, ali od roka 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu prejema odločitve o oddaji naročila.
Candidates shall be deemed to be concerned if the contracting entity has not made available information about the rejection of their application before the notification of the contract award decision to the tenderers concerned.
Zadevni kandidati so tisti, ki jim naročnik ni zagotovil informacij o zavrnitvi njihovih prošenj pred objavo odločitve o oddaji naročila zadevnim ponudnikom.
a summary of the relevant reasons as set out in Article 49(2) of Directive 2004/17/EC, and,
povzetek ustreznih razlogov, navedenih v členu 49(2) Direktive 2004/17/ES, in
if Directive 2004/17/EC does not require prior publication of a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union;
če Direktiva 2004/17/ES ne zahteva predhodne objave obvestila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije;
in the case of specific contracts based on a dynamic purchasing system as provided for in Article 15 of Directive 2004/17/EC.
kadar gre za posebna naročila, ki temeljijo na dinamičnem nabavnem sistemu, kakor določa člen 15 Direktive 2004/17/ES.
there is an infringement of Article 15(5) or (6) of Directive 2004/17/EC, and,
gre za kršitve člena 15(5) ali (6) Direktive 2004/17/ES in
the contract value is estimated to be equal to or to exceed the thresholds set out in Article 16 of Directive 2004/17/EC.
se ocenjuje, da je vrednost javnega naročila enaka ali višja od pragov, navedenih v členu 16 Direktive 2004/17/ES.
Where a Member State provides that any application for review of a contracting entity's decision taken in the context of, or in relation to, a contract award procedure falling within the scope of Directive 2004/17/EC must be made before the expiry of a specified period, this period shall be at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contracting entity's decision is sent to the tenderer or candidate if fax or electronic means are used or, if other means of communication are used, this period shall be either at least 15 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contracting entity's decision is sent to the tenderer or candidate or at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date of receipt of the contracting entity's decision.
Če države članice določijo, da je treba vse zahtevke za revizijo zoper naročnikovo odločitev, sprejeto v okviru ali v zvezi s postopkom oddaje javnega naročila s področja uporabe Direktive 2004/17/ES, vložiti pred iztekom določenega roka, znaša ta rok vsaj 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko je bil ponudnik ali kandidat po faksu ali elektronsko obveščen o tej naročnikovi odločitvi, oziroma – če se uporabijo druga komunikacijska sredstva – znaša ta rok vsaj 15 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu, ko je bil ponudnik ali kandidat obveščen o naročnikovi odločitvi ali vsaj 10 koledarskih dni od dneva, ki sledi datumu prejema naročnikove odločitve.
The communication of the contracting entity's decision to each tenderer or candidate shall be accompanied by a summary of the relevant reasons.
Vsakemu ponudniku ali kandidatu je treba poleg te naročnikove odločitve sporočiti tudi povzetek ustreznih razlogov.
In the case of an application for a review concerning decisions referred to in Article 2(1)(b) of this Directive that are not subject to a specific notification, the time period shall be at least 10 calendar days from the date of the publication of the decision concerned.
V primeru zahtevka za revizijo v zvezi z odločitvami iz člena 2(1)(b) te direktive, ki niso predmet posebnega obvestila, znaša rok vsaj 10 koledarskih dni od objave zadevne odločitve.
Member States shall ensure that a contract is considered ineffective by a review body independent of the contracting entity or that its ineffectiveness is the result of a decision of such a review body in any of the following cases:
Države članice zagotovijo, da naročilo za neveljavno razglasi revizijski organ, neodvisen od naročnika, oziroma da je neveljavnost naročila rezultat odločitve takšnega revizijskega organa v katerem koli od naslednjih primerov:
if the contracting entity has awarded a contract without prior publication of a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union without this being permissible in accordance with Directive 2004/17/EC;
če je naročnik oddal naročilo, ne da bi prej objavil obvestilo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, kadar to ni dovoljeno v skladu z Direktivo 2004/17/ES;
in case of an infringement of Article 1(5), Article 2(3) or Article 2a(2) of this Directive, if this infringement has deprived the tenderer applying for review of the possibility to pursue pre-contractual remedies where such an infringement is combined with an infringement of Directive 2004/17/EC, if that infringement has affected the chances of the tenderer applying for a review to obtain the contract;
ko gre za kršitev člena 1(5), člena 2(3) ali člena 2a(2) te direktive, če zaradi te kršitve ponudnik, ki je zaprosil za revizijo, ni imel možnosti uporabiti predpogodbenih pravnih sredstev, če je navedena kršitev združena s kršitvijo Direktive 2004/17/ES, če je ta kršitev vplivala na možnost ponudnika, ki je zaprosil za revizijo, da pridobi javno naročilo;
in cases referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 2b(c) of this Directive, if Member States have invoked the derogation from the standstill period for contracts based on a dynamic purchasing system.
v primerih iz drugega pododstavka člena 2b(c) te direktive, če so države članice uporabile odstopanje od obdobja mirovanja za naročila, ki temeljijo na dinamičnem nabavnem sistemu.
Member States may provide that the review body independent of the contracting entity may not consider a contract ineffective, even though it has been awarded illegally on the grounds mentioned in paragraph 1, if the review body finds, after having examined all relevant aspects, that overriding reasons relating to a general interest require that the effects of the contract should be maintained.
Države članice lahko določijo, da revizijski organ, neodvisen od naročnika, naročila ne šteje za neveljavno – čeprav je bilo iz razlogov, navedenih v odstavku 1, oddano nezakonito –, če revizijski organ po preučitvi vseh zadevnih vidikov ugotovi, da bi bilo treba zaradi prevladujočih razlogov v zvezi s splošnim interesom ohraniti učinke naročila.
the contracting entity considers that the award of a contract without prior publication of a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union is permissible in accordance with Directive 2004/17/EC,
naročnik meni, da je oddaja naročila brez predhodne objave obvestila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije dopustna v skladu z Direktivo 2004/17/ES,
the contracting entity has published in the Official Journal of the European Union a notice as described in Article 3a of this Directive expressing its intention to conclude the contract, and,
naročnik v Uradnem listu Evropske unije objavi obvestilo, kakor je določeno v členu 3a te direktive in ki izraža njegovo namero o sklenitvi pogodbe, in
the contracting entity considers that the award of a contract is in accordance with Article 15(5) and (6) of Directive 2004/17/EC,
naročnik meni, da je oddaja javnega naročila v skladu s členom 15(5) in (6) Direktive 2004/17/ES,
the contracting entity has sent a contract award decision, together with a summary of reasons as referred to in the first indent of the fourth subparagraph of Article 2a(2) of this Directive, to the tenderers concerned, and,
je naročnik zadevnim ponudnikom poslal odločitev o oddaji javnega naročila skupaj s povzetkom razlogov iz prve alinee člena 2a(2) te direktive in
In case of an infringement of Article 1(5), Article 2(3) or Article 2a(2) not covered by Article 2d(1)(b), Member States shall provide for ineffectiveness in accordance with Article 2d(1) to (3), or for alternative penalties.
Države članice se v primeru kršitev člena 1(5), člena 2(3) ali člena 2a(2), ki niso zajete v členu 2d(1)(b), odločijo za neveljavnost v skladu s členom 2d(1) do (3) ali pa predvidijo alternativne kazni.
Member States may provide that the review body independent of the contracting entity shall decide, after having assessed all relevant aspects, whether the contract should be considered ineffective or whether alternative penalties should be imposed.
Države članice lahko določijo, da revizijski organ, neodvisen od naročnika, po preučitvi vseh zadevnih vidikov odloči, ali naj se naročilo opredeli kot neveljavno oziroma ali bi bilo treba naložiti alternativne kazni.
the imposition of fines on the contracting entity; or,
odreditev globe za naročnika ali
Member States may confer on the review body broad discretion to take into account all the relevant factors, including the seriousness of the infringement, the behaviour of the contracting entity and, in the cases referred to in Article 2d(2), the extent to which the contract remains in force.
Države članice lahko revizijskemu organu podelijo široke diskrecijske pravice, da upošteva vse bistvene dejavnike, vključno z resnostjo kršitve, vedenjem naročnika, v primerih iz člena 2d(2) pa tudi, v kolikšni meri določena pogodba ostaja v veljavi.
the contracting entity published a contract award notice in accordance with Articles 43 and 44 of Directive 2004/17/EC, provided that this notice includes the justification of the decision of the contracting entity to award the contract without prior publication of a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union, or
naročnik objavil obvestilo o oddaji naročila v skladu s členoma 43 in 44 Direktive 2004/17/ES, če to obvestilo vključuje utemeljitev izbire naročnika, da sklene pogodbo brez predhodne objave obvestila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, ali
the contracting entity informed the tenderers and candidates concerned of the conclusion of the contract, provided that this information contains a summary of the relevant reasons as set out in Article 49(2) of Directive 2004/17/EC.
naročnik obvestil zadevne ponudnike in kandidate o oddaji naročila, če to obvestilo vsebuje povzetek ustreznih razlogov, navedenih v členu 49(2) Direktive 2004/17/ES.
Articles 3 to 7 shall be replaced by the following:
členi 3 do 7 se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
the name and contact details of the contracting entity;
ime in kontaktne podatke naročnika;
a justification of the decision of the contracting entity to award the contract without prior publication of a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union;
utemeljitev odločitve naročnika o oddaji naročila brez predhodne objave obvestila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije;
where appropriate, any other information deemed useful by the contracting entity.
po potrebi vsi drugi podatki, ki se naročniku zdijo koristni.
The Commission may invoke the procedure provided for in paragraphs 2 to 5 when, prior to a contract being concluded, it considers that a serious infringement of Community law in the field of procurement has been committed during a contract award procedure falling within the scope of Directive 2004/17/EC, or in relation to Article 27(a) of that Directive in the case of contracting entities to which that provision applies.
Komisija lahko uporabi postopek iz odstavkov 2 do 5, kadar pred sklenitvijo pogodbe meni, da je med postopkom oddaje javnega naročila, ki spada v področje uporabe Direktive 2004/17/ES, ali v zvezi s členom 27(a) navedene direktive v primeru naročnikov, za katere se ta določba uporablja, prišlo do hujše kršitve prava Skupnosti na področju javnih naročil.