natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
in other cases, where relocation simply consists of the dismantling, removal and re-erection of existing facilities, aid up to 100 % of the actual costs incurred may be accepted;
v drugih primerih, kadar premestitev pomeni samo demontiranje, odstranitev in ponovno postavitev obstoječih obratov, se lahko prejme pomoč v višini do 100 % dejansko nastalih stroškov,
when relocation results in the farmer benefiting from more modern facilities, the contribution from the farmer must be at least equivalent to 60 % (50 % in the case of the less-favoured areas) of the increase in the value of the facilities concerned after relocation (55 % or 45 % respectively in cases where the beneficiary is a young farmer);
kadar ima kmet zaradi premestitve sodobnejše obrate, mora biti njegov prispevek vsaj 60 % (50 % na območjih z omejenimi možnostmi) povečanja vrednosti zadevnih obratov po premestitvi (55 % oziroma 45 %, kadar je upravičenec mladi kmet),
where relocation results in an increase in production capacity, the contribution from the beneficiary must be at least equal to 60 % (50 % in the less-favoured areas) of the corresponding proportion of the expenses (55 % or 45 % respectively in cases where the beneficiary is a young farmer).
kadar je proizvodna zmogljivost zaradi premestitve večja, mora biti prispevek upravičenca vsaj 60 % (50 % na območjih z omejenimi možnostmi) ustreznega deleža stroškov (55 % oziroma 45 %, kadar je upravičenec mladi kmet).
When investments are carried out for environmental reasons, point 4.1.2.4 of the agricultural guidelines states that the aid rates of 40 % or 50 % in the less-favoured areas may be increased by 20 or 25 percentage points if the investment goes beyond the minimum Community requirements in force.
Kadar se naložbe izvajajo iz okoljskih razlogov, se stopnji pomoči 40 % ali 50 % na območjih z omejenimi možnostmi v skladu s točko 4.1.2.4 kmetijskih smernic lahko poveča za 20 ali 25 %, če je naložba večja od najmanjših veljavnih zahtev Skupnosti.
In that case, the increase must be confined to the extra eligible costs necessary to meet the objective referred to and does not apply in the case of investments which result in an increase in production capacity.
V tem primeru mora biti povečanje omejeno na dodatne upravičene stroške, ki so potrebni, da se doseže zadevni cilj, in ne velja za naložbe, s katerimi se poveča proizvodno zmogljivost.
According to point 13 of the agricultural guidelines, aid for introduction of process and product certification and related studies may not exceed EUR 100000 per beneficiary over any three-year period or, for SMEs, 50 % of the eligible costs, whichever is greater.
V skladu s točko 13 kmetijskih smernic pomoč za uvedbo postopka in certificiranje izdelkov ter s tem povezanih študij ne sme preseči 100000 EUR na upravičenca v katerem koli obdobju treh let ali pri malih in srednje velikih podjetjih 50 % upravičenih stroškov, in sicer tiste vrednosti, ki je večja.
According to point 14 of the agricultural guidelines, training aid may not exceed EUR 100000 per beneficiary over any three-year period or, for SMEs, 50 % of the eligible costs, whichever is greater.
V skladu s točko 14 kmetijskih smernic pomoč za usposabljanje ne sme preseči 100000 EUR na upravičenca v katerem koli obdobju treh let ali pri malih ali srednje velikih podjetjih 50 % upravičenih stroškov, in sicer tiste vrednosti, ki je večja.
Moreover, certain conditions have to be fulfilled: the aid must be available to all those eligible in the area concerned and where the service is provided by producer groups or other agricultural mutual support organisations, it must not be limited to the members of the group or organisation in question and the contribution towards the administrative costs of the group or organisation must be limited to the costs of providing the service.
Poleg tega morajo biti izpolnjeni nekateri pogoji: pomoč mora biti na razpolago vsem upravičencem na zadevnem območju in če storitve opravljajo skupine proizvajalcev ali podporne službe drugih kmetijskih organizacij, ne sme biti omejena na člane zadevne skupine ali organizacije in mora biti prispevek za upravne stroške skupine ali organizacije omejen na stroške opravljanja storitev.
On the basis of the information available to the Commission, it seems that the aid intensities calculated for the scheme (37,05 % for 2004 and 36,89 % for 2005) do not exceed those established in the various points of the agricultural guidelines mentioned above, but it is not possible to determine whether all the conditions listed in points 131 to 136 of this Decision have been fulfilled, except in the case of relocation measures, where the provisions of the scheme comply with the rules described in point 133.
Na podlagi informacij, ki so na razpolago Komisiji, se zdi, da intenzivnosti pomoči, izračunane za shemo (37,05 % za leto 2004 in 36,89 % za leto 2005), ne presegajo intenzivnosti pomoči, določenih v različnih točkah kmetijskih smernic, navedenih zgoraj, vendar pa ni mogoče ugotoviti, ali so izpolnjeni vsi pogoji iz točk od 131 do 136 te odločbe, razen pri ukrepih premestitve, kadar določbe sheme izpolnjujejo predpise, opisane v točki 133.
In particular:
Zlasti
there is no evidence showing that, among the operating costs listed in point 22, leasing operations have been followed by the purchase of the good at the end of the lease;
v stroških poslovanja iz točke 22 ni dokazov, da je bilo blago po koncu najema kupljeno,
there is no evidence showing that costs such as those linked to studies for implementation of new technology, patent registration, studies on eligibility to aid and studies on organisation and markets have been taking into account only up to 12 % of the other eligible expenses listed in point 131 in the calculation of the aid;
ni dokazov, da so bili stroški, kot so stroški študij za uvajanje nove tehnologije, registracije patentov, študij o upravičenosti do pomoči in študij o organizaciji in trgih pri izračunu pomoči, upoštevani samo v višini do 12 % drugih upravičenih stroškov iz točke 131,
there is no evidence showing that training activities have been supported in conformity with the provisions of point 14.1. of the agricultural guidelines;
ni dokazov, da so bile dejavnosti usposabljanja finančno podprte v skladu z določbami točke 14.1 kmetijskih smernic,
there is no evidence showing that aid linked to introduction of process and product certification and related studies has been granted in conformity with point 13 of the agricultural guidelines;
ni dokazov, da je bila pomoč za uvedbo postopka in certificiranje izdelkov ter s tem povezanih študij dodeljena v skladu s točko 13 kmetijskih smernic,
there is no evidence that annual plants have been excluded from the scope of the aid earmarked for the purchase of plants;
ni dokazov, da so bile letne rastline izključene s področja uporabe pomoči, namenjenega za nakup rastlin,
there is no evidence showing that all farms having received aids within the framework of the scheme complied with minimum standards in the fields of environment, hygiene and animal handling, and that the investments were focused on products for which market outlets could be found.
ni dokazov, da so vse kmetije, ki so prejele pomoč na podlagi sheme, izpolnjevale minimalne okoljske in higienske standarde in standarde za ravnanje z živalmi ter da so bile naložbe usmerjene na izdelke, za katere je bilo mogoče najti prodajne možnosti.
AIDS for processing and marketing of agricultural products are governed by point 4.2 of the agricultural guidelines, which contains two sets of rules:
Pomoči za predelavo in trženje kmetijskih izdelkov ureja točka 4.2 kmetijskih smernic, ki vsebuje dva niza predpisov:
a first set in which aid may be granted up to 50 % of the eligible expenses in Objective 1 regions and 40 % in the other regions, the eligible expense being the construction, acquisition or improvement of immovable property, new machine and equipment (including computer software) and general costs (such as architects, engineers and consultation fees, feasibility studies, the acquisition of patents and licences) up to 12 % of the amount corresponding to the other expenses quoted; in order to be eligible for aid, the beneficiary must, as in the case of primary production, comply with minimum standards regarding the environment, hygiene and animal handling; moreover no aid may be granted unless sufficient evidence can be produced that normal market outlets for the products concerned can be found, and investment projects with eligible expenses in excess of EUR 25 million or where the aid exceeds EUR 12 million must be specifically notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
prvi niz, v katerem je pomoč mogoče dodeliti v višini do 50 % upravičenih stroškov na območjih cilja I in 40 % na drugih območjih, pri čemer so upravičeni stroški gradnja, pridobitev ali izboljšanje nepremičnin, novi stroji in oprema (vključno z računalniško programsko opremo) in splošni stroški (kot so honorarji za arhitekte, inženirje in svetovalce, stroški študij izvedljivosti ter pridobitev patentov in licenc) v višini do 12 % zneska drugih navedenih stroškov; da je upravičenec upravičen do pomoči, mora kot pri primarni proizvodnji izpolnjevati minimalne okoljske in higienske standarde ter standarde za ravnanje z živalmi; poleg tega se pomoč ne sme dodeliti, če niso predloženi zadostni dokazi, da je za zadevne izdelke mogoče najti normalne prodajne možnosti, investicijske projekte z upravičenimi stroški, ki presegajo 25 milijonov EUR, ali projekte, pri katerih pomoč presega 12 milijonov EUR, pa je treba v skladu s členom 88(3) Pogodbe izrecno priglasiti Komisiji,
a second set according to which, in the case of State aid for investments in connection with processing and marketing of agricultural products which are granted within the framework of a regional aid scheme which has been previously approved by the Community guidelines on national regional aid.
drugi niz za državne pomoči za naložbe v zvezi s predelavo in trženjem kmetijskih izdelkov, ki se dodelijo na podlagi sheme regionalnih pomoči, ki je bila predhodno odobrena v skladu s Smernicami Skupnosti o državni regionalni pomoči.
In the present case, only the first set of rules is applicable, as the scheme under which aids for processing and marketing of agricultural products are envisaged is not approved but contested by the Commission.
V obravnavanem primeru se uporablja samo prvi niz predpisov, saj sheme, na podlagi katere so predvidene pomoči za predelavo in trženje kmetijskih izdelkov, Komisija ni odobrila, ampak ji nasprotuje.
As in the case of primary production, the Commission notes that the aid intensities calculated for the scheme do not exceed those established in point 4.2 of the agricultural guidelines, but it is not possible to determine whether all the conditions quoted in the first indent of point 139 of this Decision above have been fulfilled.
Kot pri primarni proizvodnji Komisija ugotavlja, da intenzivnosti pomoči, izračunane za shemo, ne presegajo intenzivnosti pomoči, določenih v točki 4.2 kmetijskih smernic, vendar pa ni mogoče ugotoviti, ali so izpolnjeni vsi zgornji pogoji iz prve alinee točke 139 te odločbe.
there is no evidence showing that, among the operating costs listed in point 22 above, leasing operations have been followed by the purchase of the good at the end of the lease;
v stroških poslovanja iz točke 22 zgoraj ni dokazov, da je bilo blago po koncu najema kupljeno,
there is no evidence showing that costs such as those linked to studies for implementation of new technology, patent registration, studies on eligibility to aid and studies on organisation and markets have been taking into account only up to 12 % of the other eligible expenses listed in point 139 above in the calculation of the aid;
ni dokazov, da so bili stroški, kot so stroški študij za uvajanje nove tehnologije, registracije patentov, študij o upravičenosti do pomoči in študij o organizaciji in trgih, pri izračunu pomoči upoštevani samo v višini do 12 % drugih upravičenih stroškov iz zgornje točke 139,
there is no evidence showing that all companies having received aids within the framework of the scheme complied with minimum standards in the fields of environment, hygiene and animal handling, and that the investments were focused on products for which market outlets could be found;
ni dokazov, da so vsa podjetja, ki so prejela pomoč na podlagi sheme, izpolnjevala minimalne okoljske in higienske standarde in standarde za ravnanje z živalmi ter da so bile naložbe usmerjene na izdelke, za katere je bilo mogoče najti prodajne možnosti,
there is no evidence showing that all investment projects in processing and marketing of agricultural products were projects with eligible expenses not exceeding of EUR 25 million or where the aid did not exceed EUR 12 million.
ni dokazov, da so bili vsi investicijski projekti za predelavo in trženje kmetijskih izdelkov projekti z upravičenimi stroški, ki ne presegajo 25 milijonov EUR, ali projekti, za katere pomoč ni presegla 12 milijonov EUR.
Consequently, except in the case of relocation measures, the Commission notes that the scheme does not respect the above mentioned conditions of the agricultural guidelines, and hence, is incompatible under the agricultural guidelines.
Zato z izjemo ukrepov za premestitev Komisija ugotavlja, da shema ne izpolnjuje zgoraj navedenih pogojev kmetijskih smernic, in zato ni skladna na podlagi kmetijskih smernic.
Moreover, the Commission found that the Greek authorities did not demonstrate that any individual aid would be from the moment of its granting compatible under these Guidelines or Commission practice under Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty.
Poleg tega po ugotovitvah Komisije grški organi niso dokazali, da je katera koli posamezna pomoč od svoje dodelitve skladna na podlagi teh smernic ali prakse Komisije v skladu s členom 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES.
Compatibility under State aid guidelines applicable to the fisheries and aquaculture sector
Skladnost na podlagi Smernic za državno pomoč v ribištvu in ribogojstvu
Fishing and aquaculture firms can benefit from the measure under scrutiny.
Do obravnavanega ukrepa so upravičena podjetja, ki se ukvarjajo z ribištvom in ribogojstvom.
Projects of State aid related to fisheries and aquaculture shall be considered in the context of the Guidelines for the Examination of the State Aid to Fisheries and Aquaculture.
Projekti državne pomoči za ribištvo in ribogojstvo so preučeni glede na Smernice za pregled državnih pomoči za ribištvo in ribogojstvo.
After the entry into the force of the Greek Law 3220/2004 setting up the scheme of aids at issue, the Guidelines changed from 1 January 2005.
Po začetku veljavnosti grškega zakona 3220/2004, s katerim je bila določena obravnavana shema pomoči, so se smernice 1. januarja 2005 spremenile.
It follows that the Guidelines for the Examination of the State Aid to Fisheries and Aquaculture from 2001 [131] should be applied to aid granted before 1 November 2004.
Zato je treba za pomoč, dodeljeno pred 1. novembrom 2004, uporabljati Smernice za pregled državnih pomoči za ribištvo in ribogojstvo iz leta 2001 [131].
The current guidelines from 2004 [132] apply to aid granted after 1 November 2004.
Veljavne Smernice iz leta 2004 [132] pa se uporabljajo za pomoč, dodeljeno po 1. novembru 2004.
In general it should be noted that no State aid may be declared compatible by the Commission if the Member State concerned has not communicated the total amount of aid per measure as well as the aid intensity.
Na splošno je treba opozoriti, da Komisija državne pomoči ne more razglasiti za združljivo, če ji zadevna država članica ne sporoči skupne višine pomoči na ukrep in intenzivnosti pomoči.
The cumulative effect for the recipient of all state subsidies must be taken into account when the scheme is being assessed.
Pri ocenjevanju sheme je treba upoštevati kumulativni učinek za prejemnika vseh državnih subvencij.
The scheme under examination neither provides such details nor allows such an assessment.
Obravnavana shema ne zagotavlja takih podrobnosti in ne dopušča take ocene.
Moreover, the scheme at issue does not ensure that the Member State will verify the beneficiary's compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy.
Poleg tega obravnavana shema ne zagotavlja, da bo država članica preverila, ali upravičenec izpolnjuje pravila skupne ribiške politike.
Both versions of the Guidelines provide for a prohibition of aid which does not impose any obligation on the part of the recipient.
V skladu z obema različicama smernic je dodelitev pomoči, ki prejemniku ne nalaga nobenih obveznosti, prepovedana.
These Guidelines underscore the enforcement of the control of such aids, especially the ones accorded in form of tax relief.
Te smernice poudarjajo izvajanje nadzora takih pomoči, zlasti pomoči, dodeljenih v obliki davčnih oprostitev.
As no information has been provided by the Member State in order to assess the aid to fishery and aquaculture, the Commission must consider them as not compatible.
Ker država članica ni predložila informacij za oceno pomoči za ribištvo in ribogojstvo, jih mora Komisija obravnavati kot nezdružljive.
Investment aids should be checked by the Commission with respect to the different types of beneficiaries (fishermen, aquaculture, processing, and marketing).
Pomoči za naložbe mora Komisija pregledati glede na različne vrste upravičencev (ribiče, ribogojstvo, predelavo in trženje).
Every single application of the measure should be assessed separately on the basis of detailed conditions listed in the Guidelines.
Vsako posamezno uporabo ukrepa je treba oceniti ločeno na podlagi podrobnih pogojev iz Smernic.
The information contained in the scheme does not allow such an assessment.
Informacije iz sheme ne dopuščajo take ocene.
On the basis of the above, the Commission considers the Article 2 of Law 3220/2004, insofar as it concerns fisheries and aquaculture, not to be compatible.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega Komisija člen 2 zakona 3220/2004 v obsegu, v katerem se nanaša na ribištvo in ribogojstvo, razglaša za nezdružljivega.
Consequently, the Commission found that the Greek authorities did not demonstrate that any individual aid would be from the moment of its granting compatible under these guidelines [133].
Zato po ugotovitvah Komisije ugotovila, da grški organi niso dokazali, da je katera koli posamezna pomoč od svoje dodelitve skladna na podlagi teh smernic [133].
Compatibility under Article 87(2) and (3) of the EC Treaty
Skladnost na podlagi člena 87(2) in (3) Pogodbe ES
None of the exceptions under Article 87(2) of the EC Treaty can be applied in this case, as the measure is not aimed at the objectives listed in these provisions.
V tem primeru ni mogoče uporabiti nobene izjeme iz člena 87(2) Pogodbe ES, saj ukrep ni namenjen ciljem iz teh določb.
Under Article 87(3)(a) of the EC Treaty, aid is considered compatible with the common market when it is designed to promote the economic development of areas where the standard of living is abnormally low or where there is serious underemployment.
V skladu s členom 87(3)(a) Pogodbe ES se kot združljiva s skupnim trgom lahko šteje pomoč za pospeševanje gospodarskega razvoja območij, kjer je življenjska raven izjemno nizka ali kjer je podzaposlenost velika.
The criteria for assessment of the compatibility under this article are reflected in the specific rules as they are discussed above.
Merila za oceno združljivosti v skladu s tem členom so prikazana v posebnih predpisih, ki so obravnavana zgoraj.
As regards Article 87(3)(b) of the EC Treaty, the aid in question is not intended to promote the execution of an important project of common European interest nor to remedy to a serious disturbance in the economy of Greece, nor is it intended to promote culture or heritage conservation.
Glede člena 87(3)(b) Pogodbe ES obravnavana pomoč ni namenjena za pospeševanje izvedbe pomembnega projekta skupnega evropskega interesa ali za odpravljanje resne motnje v gospodarstvu Grčije ali za pospeševanje kulture in ohranjanja kulturne dediščine.
Article 87(3)(d) of the EC Treaty concerns culture and heritage conservation where such aid does not affect trading conditions and Competition in the Community to an extend that is contrary to the common interest.
Člen 87(3)(d) Pogodbe ES se nanaša na pomoč za pospeševanje kulture in ohranjanja kulturne dediščine, kadar takšna pomoč ne škoduje trgovinskim pogojem in konkurenci v Skupnosti v obsegu, ki je v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
This can concern aid to monasteries for erecting hostels and cultural centres and undertaking in listed buildings or with traditional production or with a name of origin in respect to the repair and restoration of listed buildings, the investment into traditional machinery or certification of traditional products or processes that are considered as natural heritage.
To se lahko nanaša na pomoč samostanom za gradnjo mladinskih hotelov in kulturnih centrov ter podjetjem v zgradbah pod spomeniškim varstvom, s tradicionalno proizvodnjo ali z imenom s poreklom za popravljanje in obnavljanje zgradb pod spomeniškim varstvom, naložbe v tradicionalne stroje ali certificiranje tradicionalnih izdelkov ali postopkov, ki se štejejo za naravno dediščino.
However, the Commission does not have any information concerning nature of these activities as cultural heritage, the extent of the aid and its impact on the trading conditions.
Vendar pa Komisija nima podatkov o naravi teh dejavnosti kot kulturne dediščine, obsegu pomoči in njenem vplivu na trgovinske pogoje.
Therefore, the Commission cannot conclude on the compatibility of these measures under the Article 87(3)(d) of the EC Treaty.
Zato Komisija ne more skleniti, da so ti ukrepi skladni na podlagi člena 87(3)(d) Pogodbe ES.
Lastly, it is necessary to examine whether the aid can qualify for the exception laid down in Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty which states that may be considered compatible an aid to facilitate the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic areas where such aid does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Nazadnje je treba preveriti, ali se za pomoč lahko uporabi izjema iz člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES, ki pravi, da se kot združljiva lahko šteje pomoč za pospeševanje razvoja določenih gospodarskih dejavnosti ali določenih gospodarskih območij, kadar takšna pomoč ne spreminja trgovinskih pogojev v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
Any aid that does not comply with the conditions under the specific rules requires a detailed justification, which is not provided by the Greek authorities.
Vsako pomoč, ki ne izpolnjuje pogojev iz posebnih predpisov, je treba podrobno utemeljiti, česar grški organi niso storili.
Therefore, the Commission cannot conclude on the compatibility of these measures directly under the Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty.
Zato Komisija ne more skleniti, da so ti ukrepi skladni neposredno na podlagi člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES.
Since the aid scheme, as a whole and in all parts, except for relocation of farm buildings in the agricultural sector, does not qualify for any of the exceptions provided for in the Treaty, the Commission concludes that the aid scheme is incompatible with the common market, except for relocation of farm buildings in the agricultural sector, for which, on the basis of the analysis made above, aid granted:
Ker za shemo pomoči kot celoto in za vse njene dele, razen premestitve kmetijskih poslopij v kmetijskem sektorju, ni mogoče uporabiti nobene izjeme iz Pogodbe, je Komisija sklenila, da shema pomoči ni združljiva s skupnim trgom, razen premestitve kmetijskih poslopij v kmetijskem sektorju in zanjo dodeljene pomoči na podlagi zgornje analize:
does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty, when relocation results from an expropriation which, in accordance with the legislation of the Member State concerned, gives right to compensation; or
ni državna pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe, če potreba po premestitvi izhaja iz razlastitve, zaradi katere v skladu z zakonodajo zadevne države članice nastane pravica do nadomestila, ali