natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is therefore appropriate to make a Community financial contribution for the financing of the development of the animal disease information system for the period from 2008 to 2012 by the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE).
Zato je primerno, da Skupnost zagotovi finančni prispevek za Mednarodni urad za živalske kužne bolezni (OIE) v podporo razvoju informacijskega sistema o živalskih boleznih za obdobje 2008–2012.
The maximum amount of that contribution should be specified.
Treba je določiti najvišji znesek navedenega prispevka.
Gathering analysing and summarising information on animal health in the Balkans, the Caucasus and the Mediterranean areas, especially as regards diseases which are spread across borders, is of paramount importance for the Community, in order to prevent threats to animal health within its territory.
Za preprečevanje nevarnosti za zdravje živali na ozemlju Skupnosti je odločilnega pomena zbiranje, analiziranje in povzemanje podatkov o zdravju živali na Balkanu, Kavkazu ter sredozemskih območjih, zlasti v zvezi z boleznimi, ki se razširijo čez meje.
That information is, however, not readily available in all cases.
Vendar ti podatki niso vedno takoj na voljo.
The OIE has developed a Tool for the Evaluation of Performance of Veterinary Services (OIE PVS Tool).
OIE je razvil pripomoček za oceno opravljanja veterinarskih storitev (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pripomoček OIE PVS).
That tool is designed to assist veterinary services of countries which are members of OIE to establish their current level of performance and to identify gaps and weaknesses regarding their ability to comply with OIE international standards.
Navedeni pripomoček bo veterinarskim službam v državah članicah OIE pomagal ugotoviti njihovo trenutno raven učinkovitosti ter opredeliti vrzeli in pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z njihovo zmožnostjo izpolnjevanja mednarodnih standardov OIE.
The OIE PVS Tool also generates information on animal health in OIE member countries.
Pripomoček OIE PVS se uporablja tudi za zbiranje podatkov o zdravju živali v državah članicah OIE.
The Community should therefore analyse the activities and information generated by that tool with regard to the Balkans, the Caucasus and the Mediterranean areas.
Skupnost mora zato analizirati dejavnosti in podatke, pridobljene z navedenim pripomočkom na Balkanu, Kavkazu ter sredozemskih območjih.
It is therefore appropriate to make a Community financial contribution for the development and analysis of the animal health activities in the Balkans, the Caucasus and the Mediterranean areas by OIE.
Zato je primerno, da Skupnost zagotovi finančni prispevek za pomoč OIE pri razvoju in analizi dejavnosti, povezanih z zdravjem živali, na Balkanu, Kavkazu in sredozemskih območjih.
Article 168(1)(c) of Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the financial regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [4] provides that grants may be awarded without a call for proposals to bodies with a de jure or de facto monopoly duly substantiated in the award decision.
Člen 168(1)(c) Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 z dne 23. decembra 2002 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [4] določa, da se lahko dotacije dodelijo brez razpisa za zbiranje predlogov organom, ki imajo pravno ali dejansko monopol, ki je primerno utemeljen v sklepu o dodelitvi dotacije.
The OIE has a de facto monopoly in its sector, since its creation through the international Agreement signed on 25 January 1924.
OIE ima dejanski monopol v svojem sektorju, od svoje ustanovitve z mednarodnim sporazumom, podpisanim 25. januarja 1924.
The OIE is the intergovernmental organisation responsible for improving animal health worldwide and it is recognized as a reference organisation by the World Trade Organization (WTO).
OIE je medvladna organizacija, ki je odgovorna za izboljšanje zdravja živali po celem svetu in jo Svetovna trgovinska organizacija (STO) priznava kot referenčno organizacijo.
A call for proposals is therefore not necessary for the financial contributions awarded to that organisation, pursuant to this Decision.
Razpis za zbiranje predlogov v skladu s tem sklepom za dodelitev finančnega prispevka navedeni organizaciji zato ni potreben.
A Community financial contribution, as provided for in Article 19 of Decision 90/424/EEC, is hereby awarded for the financing of the development of the animal disease information system for the period from 2008 to 2012 by the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), up to a maximum amount of EUR 750000.
V skladu s členom 19 Odločbe 90/424/EGS se Mednarodnemu uradu za živalske kužne bolezni (OIE) za obdobje 2008–2012 dodeli finančni prispevek Skupnosti v višini največ 750000 EUR za razvoj informacijskega sistema o živalskih boleznih.
A Community financial contribution, as provided for in Article 19 of Decision 90/424/EEC, is hereby awarded for the financing of the analysis of the animal health activities in the Balkans, the Caucasus and the Mediterranean areas by OIE, for the period from 2008 to 2012, up to a maximum amount of EUR 250000.
V skladu s členom 19 Odločbe 90/424/EGS se Mednarodnemu uradu za živalske kužne bolezni (OIE) za obdobje 2008–2012 dodeli finančni prispevek Skupnosti v višini največ 250000 EUR za analizo dejavnosti, povezanih z zdravjem živali na Balkanu, Kavkazu in sredozemskih območjih.
The financial contributions provided for in Articles 1 and 2 shall be financed through the budget line 17 04 02 01 of the budget of the European Communities for 2008.
Finančni prispevki iz členov 1 in 2 se financirajo iz proračunske vrstice 17 04 02 01 proračuna Evropskih skupnosti za leto 2008.
Done at Brussels, 11 September 2008.
V Bruslju, 11. septembra 2008
of 12 September 2008
z dne 12. septembra 2008
recognising in principle the completeness of the dossier submitted for detailed examination in view of the possible inclusion of spinetoram in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC
o načelnem priznavanju popolnosti dokumentacije, predložene v podroben pregled zaradi možne vključitve spinetorama v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS
(notified under document number C(2008) 4965)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 4965)
Directive 91/414/EEC provides for the development of a Community list of active substances authorised for incorporation in plant protection products.
Direktiva 91/414/EGS predvideva oblikovanje skupnostnega seznama aktivnih snovi, dovoljenih za uporabo v fitofarmacevtskih sredstvih.
A dossier for the active substance spinetoram was submitted by Dow Agrosciences to the authorities of the United Kingdom on 17 October 2007 with an application to obtain its inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Družba Dow AgroSciences je 17. oktobra 2007 organom Združenega kraljestva predložila dokumentacijo za aktivno snov spinetoram z zahtevkom za njeno vključitev v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
The authorities of the United Kingdom have indicated to the Commission that, on preliminary examination, the dossier for the active substance concerned appears to satisfy the data and information requirements set out in Annex II to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Organi Združenega kraljestva so Komisiji sporočili, da je po predhodnem pregledu dokumentacije za zadevno aktivno snov videti, da dokumentacija izpolnjuje zahteve po podatkih in informacijah iz Priloge II k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, the dossier was subsequently forwarded by the applicant to the Commission and other Member States, and was referred to the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health.
Vlagatelj je v skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS dokumentacijo naknadno posredoval Komisiji in drugim državam članicam, predložena pa je bila Stalnemu odboru za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali.
By this Decision it should be formally confirmed at Community level that the dossier is considered as satisfying in principle the data and information requirements set out in Annex II and, for at least one plant protection product containing the active substance concerned, the requirements set out in Annex III to Directive 91/414/EEC.
S to odločbo je treba na ravni Skupnosti uradno potrditi, da dokumentacija načeloma izpolnjuje zahteve po podatkih in informacijah iz Priloge II in da za najmanj eno fitofarmacevtsko sredstvo, ki vsebuje zadevno aktivno snov, izpolnjuje zahteve iz Priloge III k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
This Decision should not prejudice the right of the Commission to request the applicant to submit further data or information in order to clarify certain points in the dossier.
Ta odločba ne sme posegati v pravico Komisije, da za razjasnitev nekaterih točk v dokumentaciji od vlagatelja zahteva predložitev dodatnih podatkov ali informacij.
Without prejudice to Article 6(4) of Directive 91/414/EEC, the dossier concerning the active substance identified in the Annex to this Decision, which was submitted to the Commission and the Member States with a view to obtaining the inclusion of that substance in Annex I to that Directive, satisfy in principle the data and information requirements set out in Annex II to that Directive.
Brez poseganja v člen 6(4) Direktive 91/414/EGS dokumentacija o aktivni snovi, opredeljeni v Prilogi k tej odločbi, ki je bila predložena Komisiji in državam članicam zaradi vključitve navedene snovi v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi, načeloma izpolnjuje zahteve po podatkih in informacijah iz Priloge II k navedeni direktivi.
The dossier also satisfies the data and information requirements set out in Annex III to that Directive in respect of one plant protection product containing the active substance, taking into account the uses proposed.
Dokumentacija ob upoštevanju predlagane uporabe izpolnjuje tudi zahteve po podatkih in informacijah iz Priloge III k navedeni direktivi za eno fitofarmacevtsko sredstvo, ki vsebuje to aktivno snov.
The rapporteur Member State shall pursue the detailed examination for the dossier referred to in Article 1 and shall communicate to the Commission the conclusions of its examination accompanied by a recommendation on the inclusion or non-inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC of the active substance referred to in Article 1 and any conditions for that inclusion as soon as possible and at the latest within a period of one year from the date of publication of this Decision in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Država članica poročevalka opravi podroben pregled dokumentacije iz člena 1 ter čim prej in najpozneje v enem letu po objavi te odločbe v Uradnem listu Evropske unije sporoči Komisiji ugotovitve pregleda in priporočilo o vključitvi ali nevključitvi aktivne snovi iz člena 1 v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS ter vse pogoje za navedeno vključitev.
Done at Brussels, 12 September 2008.
V Bruslju, 12. septembra 2008
CIPAC-No: 802
Št. CIPAC: 802
17 October 2007
oktober 2007
establishing that Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors is not applicable to the production and wholesale of electricity in Poland
o neuporabi člena 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil naročnikov v vodnem, energetskem in transportnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev pri proizvodnji in veleprodaji električne energije na Poljskem
(notified under document number C(2008) 4805)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 4805)
Having regard to the request submitted by the Republic of Poland by a letter received on 19 May 2008,
ob upoštevanju zahtevka, ki ga je Republika Poljska poslala z dopisom, prejetim 19. maja 2008,
On 19 May 2008, the Commission received a Polish request pursuant to Article 30(4) of Directive 2004/17/EC, transmitted to the Commission by letter.
Komisija je 19. maja 2008 prejela zahtevo Poljske v skladu s členom 30(4) Direktive 2004/17/ES, ki je bila Komisiji predložena v obliki dopisa.
The Commission requested additional information by e-mail of 11 July 2008, which was transmitted by the Polish authorities by e-mail of 28 July 2008, after the end of the deadline set for answering.
Komisija je z elektronsko pošto z dne 11. julija 2008 zahtevala dodatne informacije, ki so jih poljski organi poslali po elektronski pošti 28. julija 2008, tj. po izteku roka za odgovor.
The request submitted by the Republic of Poland concerns production and wholesale of electricity.
Zahteva Republike Poljske se nanaša na proizvodnjo in veleprodajo električne energije.
The request is introduced, and thus endorsed, by the independent national authority, (Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki, the Polish energy regulatory office).
Zahtevo je predložil in tako tudi potrdil neodvisni nacionalni organ (Urzędu Regulacji Energetyki, poljski urad za upravljanje energije).
Directive 96/92/EC has been superseded by Directive 2003/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 96/92/EC [3], which requires an even higher degree of market opening.
Direktivo 96/92/ES je nadomestila Direktiva 2003/54/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2003 o skupnih pravilih za notranji trg z električno energijo in o razveljavitvi Direktive 96/92/ES [3], ki zahteva še večjo stopnjo odpiranja trga.
Poland has implemented and applied not only Directive 96/92/EC but also Directive 2003/54/EC, opting for legal and organisational unbundling for transmission and distribution networks except for the smallest distribution companies, which, while continuing to be subject to accounting unbundling, are exempted from the requirements of legal and organisational unbundling having less than 100000 customers or serving electricity systems with consumption lower than 3 TWh in 1996.
Poljska ne izvaja in uporablja samo Direktive 96/92/ES, ampak tudi Direktivo 2003/54/ES, pri čemer je izbrala pravno in organizacijsko ločevanje za prenosno in distribucijsko omrežje, razen za najmanjša distribucijska podjetja, ki so, medtem ko zanje še vedno velja ločevanje računovodskih izkazov, izvzeta iz zahteve pravnega in organizacijskega ločevanja ter imajo manj kot 100000 odjemalcev ali oskrbujejo elektroenergetske sisteme, katerih poraba je bila v letu 1996 manjša od 3 TWh.
It is, however, foreseen that Distribution System Operators (DSOs) will function within publicly owned vertically integrated groups at least for 2008.
Predvideva pa se, da bodo upravljavci distribucijskega omrežja delovali v okviru vertikalno integriranih skupin v javni lasti vsaj v letu 2008.
The request submitted by Poland concerns production and wholesale of electricity in Poland.
Zahteva Poljske se nanaša na proizvodnjo in veleprodajo električne energije v tej državi.
The Polish request considers that the relevant geographical market is limited to the national territory.
Zahteva Poljske upošteva, da je ustrezni geografski trg omejen na nacionalno ozemlje.
The market presents a unified character with no obstacles for electricity generated in one region of the country to be purchased by a recipient from a different region (the majority of electrical energy capacity is installed in the south of Poland, but energy from this region is sold throughout Poland).
Za trg je značilna enotnost, ki porabnikov iz ene regije države ne ovira pri nakupu električne energije, ki je bila proizvedena v drugi regiji (večina proizvodnih zmogljivosti za električno energijo se nahaja na jugu Poljske, vendar se energija, pridobljena v tej regiji, prodaja na celotnem ozemlju Poljske).
Furthermore, according to the 2007 Activity Report [4], in ‘2006 system congestion of structural character … was existent at the borders with Germany, the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Poleg tega je v skladu s Poročilom o dejavnostih iz leta 2007 [4] v „letu 2006 sistemski zastoj strukturnega značaja … obstajal na mejah z Nemčijo, Češko in Slovaško …“.
…’ In 2006 9,74 % of the total generation of electricity was exported from Poland, whereas imports to Poland in the same year amounted to 2,94 % of total generation (net exports thus accounted for 6,8 % of total generation in 2006).
V letu 2006 je bilo 9,74 % skupne proizvodnje električne energije izvožene iz Poljske, medtem ko je uvoz na Poljsko v istem letu znašal 2,94 % skupne proizvodnje (neto izvoz je tako znašal 6,8 % celotne proizvodnje v letu 2006).
Consequently, the territory of the Republic of Poland should be considered to constitute the relevant market for the purposes of evaluating the conditions laid down in Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC.
Zato se za ozemlje Republike Poljske šteje, da predstavlja ustrezen trg za namene ocenjevanja pogojev, določenih s členom 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES.
The Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Report on progress in creating the internal gas and electricity market [5], hereafter referred to as the ‘2005 Report’ states that ‘many national markets display a high degree of concentration of the industry, impeding the development of effective competition’ [6].
Komisija je v svojem sporočilu Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z naslovom „Poročilo o napredku pri oblikovanju notranjega trga s plinom in električno energijo“ [5] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Poročilo iz leta 2005) navedla, da „mnogo nacionalnih trgov kaže visoko stopnjo koncentracije industrije, ki ovira razvoj učinkovite konkurence“ [6].
Consequently, it considered that, in respect of electricity generation, ‘one indicator for the degree of competition on national markets is the total market share of the biggest three producers’ [7].
Zato je menila, da je v zvezi s proizvodnjo električne energije „eden od pokazateljev stopnje konkurence na nacionalnih trgih […] skupni tržni delež treh največjih proizvajalcev“ [7].
For 2006, the Polish authorities have indicated a share of the three largest generators of 44,2 % of the attainable power and 52,3 % of the gross production [8].
Za leto 2006 je delež treh največjih proizvajalcev po navedbah poljskih organov znašal 44,2 % dosegljive električne energije in 52,3 % bruto proizvodnje [8].
In 2007, according to the reply of the Polish authorities received on 28 July, the shares rose to 51,7 % of the attainable power and 58,0 % of the gross production [9].
V letu 2007 se je glede na odgovor poljskih organov, prejet 28. julija, delež povišal na 51,7 % dosegljive električne energije in na 58,0 % bruto proizvodnje [9].
According to the Polish authorities, the market shares of the three largest operators on the wholesale market amounted to 48,1 % in 2006 and rose to 55,4 % in 2007 [10].
Kot poročajo poljski organi, je tržni delež treh največjih gospodarskih subjektov na veleprodajnem trgu v letu 2006 znašal 48,1 %, v letu 2007 pa se je povečal na 55,4 % [10].
It has to be highlighted, that the figures provided by the Polish authorities show a clear growth, between 2006 and 2007, of the market shares of the three largest operators in each field.
Poudariti je treba, da številke, ki so jih predložili poljski organi, jasno kažejo na rast tržnega deleža treh največjih gospodarskih subjektov na posameznih področjih med leti 2006 in 2007.
These levels of concentration are higher than the corresponding percentage, 39, to which Commission Decisions 2006/211/EC [11] and 2007/141/EC [12] refer to for the UK.
Te stopnje koncentracije so višje od ustreznega odstotka, tj. 39, na katerega se sklicujeta odločbi Komisije 2006/211/ES [11] in 2007/141/ES [12] za Združeno kraljestvo.
They are similar to (or somewhat higher than) the level (52,2 %) referred to in Commission Decision 2008/585/EC [13] in respect of Austria and the Polish levels of concentration are finally lower than the corresponding levels referred to in Commission Decisions 2006/422/EC [14] and 2007/706/EC [15] concerning, respectively Finland (73,6 %) and Sweden (86,7 %).
Podobne (ali nekoliko višje) so stopnji (52,2 %) iz Odločbe Komisije 2008/585/ES [13] za Avstrijo in končno so poljske stopnje koncentracije nižje od ustreznih ravni iz odločb Komisije 2006/422/ES [14] in 2007/706/ES [15] za Finsko (73,6 %) oziroma Švedsko (86,7 %).
In all three cases, however, these levels of concentration are ‘offset’ by the ‘competitive pressure on the … market deriving from the potential to import electricity from outside …’ [16].
V vseh treh primerih se stopnje koncentracije „izravnajo“ s „… pritiskom konkurence, ki izhaja iz možnosti, da se električno energijo pridobi zunaj …“ [16].
As described under recital 9 above, there are system congestions and limited transfer capacities so that imports amount to less than 3 % of the total Polish generation as compared, e. g., to the Austrian case where ‘imported electricity accounted for approximately a quarter [17] of its total needs [18], in particular for base load power’ [19].
Kot je navedeno zgoraj v uvodni izjavi 9, znaša uvoz zaradi sistemskih zastojev in omejene prenosne zmogljivosti manj kot 3 % skupne proizvodnje električne energije na Poljskem, za razliko od npr. Avstrije, kjer „električna energija, ki jo je uvozila, … znaša približno četrtino [17] njenih celotnih potreb [18], zlasti za električno energijo za osnovno obremenitev“ [19].
In addition, according to a document issued by the President of the Polish Energy Regulatory Office [20]‘the current structure and the concentration degree of the power industry activity have resulted first from the horizontal and then from vertical consolidation of state-owned power industry companies.
Poleg tega sta glede na dokument, ki ga je izdal predsednik poljskega urada za upravljanje energije [20], „trenutna organiziranost in stopnja koncentracije dejavnosti elektrogospodarstva posledica najprej horizontalne in nato še vertikalne konsolidacije državnih elektrogospodarskih podjetij.
In fact, ‘any market participant who cannot easily match its generation portfolio to the characteristics of its customers may find itself exposed to the difference between the price at which the transmission system operator [hereinafter TSO] will sell imbalance energy, and the price at which it will buy back excess production.
Dejansko „je lahko kateri koli udeleženec na trgu, ki le s težavo prilagodi svoj proizvodni portfelj lastnostim svojih strank, izpostavljen razliki med ceno, po kateri bo upravljavec prenosnih omrežij prodajal izravnalno električno energijo, in ceno, po kateri bo odkupil presežno proizvodnjo.
The functioning of the Polish balancing market can therefore not be taken as an additional indicator that electricity production and wholesale are directly exposed to competition.
Zato delovanje poljskega izravnalnega trga ne more biti dodaten pokazatelj, da sta proizvodnja in veleprodaja električne energije neposredno izpostavljeni konkurenci.
In respect of large industrial (end)users, who are most liable to procure their electricity directly from suppliers which are at the same time generators, the number of customers switching supplier may serve as an indicator of price competition and, thus, indirectly, ‘a natural indicator of the effectiveness of competition.
Pri velikih industrijskih (končnih) uporabnikih, ki električno energijo prejemajo najbolj neposredno od dobaviteljev, ki so hkrati tudi proizvajalci, je število odjemalcev, ki menjajo dobavitelje, lahko pokazatelj cenovne konkurence in zato posredno „naravni pokazatelj učinkovitosti konkurence.
Although the retaining of controls may be justified in a period of transition, these will increasingly cause distortions as the need for investment approaches’ [25].
Čeprav je v prehodnem obdobju ohranitev nadzora mogoče upravičiti, bo le-ta povzročal še večje izkrivljanje, ko se bo pojavila potreba po naložbah“ [25].