natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The payment of the Community financial contribution must be subject to the condition that the planned activities were actually implemented and the authorities provide all necessary information within the set deadlines.
Plačilo finančnega prispevka Skupnosti se izvede pod pogojem, da so načrtovane dejavnosti dejansko že bile izvedene in da pristojni organi zagotovijo vse potrebne informacije v določenih rokih.
A financial contribution from the Community may be granted to Cyprus towards the costs incurred by that Member State in taking the measures referred to in Article 11(4)(a)(i) to (iv) and (b) of Decision 90/424/EEC to combat foot-and-mouth disease in 2007.
Cipru se lahko odobri finančni prispevek Skupnosti za kritje stroškov, ki jih je navedena država članica imela zaradi uvedbe ukrepov leta 2007 za boj proti slinavki in parkljevki iz točk (a)(i) do (a)(iv) ter točke (b) člena 11(4) Odločbe 90/424/EGS.
The financial contribution from the Community shall be 60 % of the expenditure eligible for Community funding as referred to in paragraph 1.
Finančni prispevek Skupnosti znaša 60 % odhodkov, upravičenih do financiranja Skupnosti, kakor je navedeno v odstavku 1.
A first tranche of EUR 185000 shall be paid as part of the Community financial contribution provided for in Article 1.
Prvi obrok v znesku 185000 EUR se izplača kot del finančnega prispevka Skupnosti iz člena 1.
(notified under document number C(2008) 2169)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 2169)
Pursuant to Article 3a of that Decision, Member States may obtain a Community financial contribution towards the costs of certain measures to eradicate avian influenza.
V skladu s členom 3a navedene odločbe lahko države članice dobijo finančni prispevek Skupnosti za kritje stroškov nekaterih ukrepov za izkoreninjenje aviarne influence.
Article 3a(3) of Decision 90/424/EEC lays down rules on the percentage of the costs incurred by Member States that may be covered by the Community’s financial contribution.
Člen 3a(3) Odločbe 90/424/EGS določa pravila glede deleža stroškov držav članic, ki se lahko krije s finančnim prispevkom Skupnosti.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 349/2005 of 28 February 2005 laying down rules on the Community financing of emergency measures and of the campaign to combat certain animal diseases under Council Decision 90/424/EEC [2], following the amendment of Decision 90/424/EEC by Decision 2006/53/EC [3], no longer covers avian influenza.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 349/2005 z dne 28. februarja 2005 o določitvi pravil v zvezi s financiranjem Skupnosti nujnih ukrepov in ukrepov za boj proti nekaterim živalskim boleznim iz Odločbe Sveta 90/424/EGS [2] po spremembi Odločbe 90/424/EGS z Odločbo 2006/53/ES [3] ne zajema več aviarne influence.
The United Kingdom has fully complied with its technical and administrative obligations as set out in Articles 3(3) and 3a(2) of Decision 90/424/EEC and Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 349/2005.
Združeno kraljestvo v celoti izpolnjuje tehnične in administrativne obveznosti iz členov 3(3) in 3a(2) Odločbe 90/424/EGS ter člena 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 349/2005.
The United Kingdom submitted to the Commission information on the costs incurred on 13 December 2007, and has continued to provide all necessary information on costs of compensation and operational expenditure.
Združeno kraljestvo je 13. decembra 2007 Komisiji predložilo podatke o nastalih stroških in je nato nadaljevalo s pošiljanjem vseh potrebnih informacij o stroških odškodnin in odhodkih iz poslovanja.
Financial contribution from the Community to the United Kingdom
Finančni prispevek Skupnosti Združenemu kraljestvu
A financial contribution from the Community may be granted to the United Kingdom towards the costs incurred by that Member State in taking the measures referred to in Article 3a(2) of Decision 90/424/EEC to combat avian influenza in 2007.
Združenemu kraljestvu se lahko dodeli finančni prispevek Skupnosti za kritje stroškov, ki jih je leta 2007 imelo zaradi uvedbe ukrepov za boj proti aviarni influenci iz člena 3a(2) Odločbe 90/424/EGS.
of 3 June 2008
z dne 3. junija 2008
authorising Portugal to apply a reduced rate of excise duty on locally produced beer in the autonomous region of Madeira
o dovoljenju Portugalski, da uporabi nižjo trošarinsko stopnjo za lokalno proizvedeno pivo v avtonomni pokrajini Madeira
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 299(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 299(2) Pogodbe,
By way of justification for its request, Portugal has explained that the possibilities offered by Article 4 of Council Directive 92/83/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages [3] are not sufficient to offset the disadvantages suffered by the breweries in Madeira on account of their remote location, fragmented terrain and tight local markets.
Portugalska je v utemeljitev svojega zahtevka pojasnila, da možnosti, ki jih daje člen 4 Direktive Sveta 92/83/EGS z dne 19. oktobra 1992 o uskladitvi strukture trošarin za alkohol in alkoholne pijače [3], ne zadostujejo, da se izravnajo pomanjkljivosti, ki jih pivovarne na Madeiri trpijo zaradi svoje odročnosti, razdrobljenega ozemlja in ozkih lokalnih trgov.
Under that Article, breweries whose annual beer production does not exceed 200000 hectolitres may benefit from reduced rates of excise duty, provided that those rates are not set at more than 50 % below the standard national rate.
V skladu z navedenim členom lahko pivovarne, katerih letna proizvodnja piva ne presega 200000 hektolitrov, uporabljajo nižje trošarinske stopnje, če te stopnje niso za več kot 50 % nižje od standardne nacionalne stopnje.
Their share of the local market would continue to diminish as a result of the strong competition that they would continue to face from foreign beers owing to the additional costs that they would have to meet as a result of their remoteness, namely maintaining high level of stocks, transport of raw and secondary materials, and packaging from mainland Portugal.
Njihov delež na lokalnem trgu bi se še naprej zmanjševal zaradi močne konkurence tujih piv, s katero bi se morale še naprej srečevati, zaradi dodatnih stroškov, ki bi jih morale nositi zaradi svoje odročnosti, in sicer hranjenja velikih količin zalog, prevoza surovin in sekundarnih sestavin ter embalaže s celinskega dela Portugalske.
Thus, even though such breweries would, upon reaching 200000 hectolitres annual production, cease to be ‘small’ as defined in Article 4 of Directive 92/83/EEC, they would nonetheless continue to be small compared to the large national and multinational breweries with whom they compete.
Čeprav te pivovarne, potem ko bodo dosegle letno proizvodnjo 200000 hektolitrov, ne bodo več „male“, kot je opredeljeno v navedenem členu 4 Direktive 92/83/EGS, bodo kljub temu še vedno male v primerjavi z velikimi nacionalnimi in multinacionalnimi pivovarnami, ki jim konkurirajo.
It is, therefore, essential for the continued survival of the local industry that breweries should benefit from a reduced rate in the event that their annual production exceeds 200000 hectolitres, without however going beyond 300000 hectolitres.
Da bi zato zagotovili nadaljnje preživetje lokalne industrije, je nujno, da se pivovarnam dovoli uporaba nižje stopnje, kadar njihova letna proizvodnja presega 200000 hektolitrov, a vseeno ne preseže 300000 hektolitrov.
A careful examination of the situation shows that it is essential to grant Portugal's request, if the brewing industry is to be maintained in the outermost region of Madeira.
Temeljita preučitev razmer je pokazala, da je nujno, da se zahtevek Portugalske odobri, če se želi ohraniti pivovarsko industrijo v najbolj oddaljeni regiji Madeiri.
It is clear that, in the circumstances of this case and subject to the relevant conditions, the effect of extending the tax reduction will be to place the brewing industry of Madeira on an equal footing with its competitors in mainland Portugal and other Member States.
Jasno je, da bi bil v tem primeru in ob upoštevanju ustreznih pogojev učinek razširitve znižanja davka ta, da se pivovarsko industrijo Madeire postavi v enakovreden položaj z njenimi tekmeci na celinskem delu Portugalske in v drugih državah članicah.
The tax advantages gained will do no more than offset the extra costs necessarily incurred as a result of the remoteness of the industry's location.
Odobrene davčne ugodnosti bodo samo izravnale dodatne stroške, ki nujno nastanejo zaradi odročnosti lokacije panoge.
In order not to undermine the single market, the entitlement to a reduced rate for production above 200000 hectolitres should only apply to beer produced and consumed locally in Madeira.
Da se ne bi ogrozil enotni trg, bi morala upravičenost do nižje stopnje za proizvodnjo nad 200000 hektolitrov veljati samo za pivo, ki se proizvede in porabi lokalno na Madeiri.
Although the requested derogation from Article 90 of the Treaty is necessary to ensure that the development of the outermost region of Madeira is not jeopardised, it is also necessary to set a time limit on tax derogations.
Čeprav je zaprošeno odstopanje od člena 90 Pogodbe nujno za zagotovitev, da se ne ogrozi razvoj najbolj oddaljene regije Madeira, je prav tako nujno, da se določi rok za davčna odstopanja.
On the other hand, however, it is important to ensure that local economic operators have the requisite security to develop their commercial activities.
Po drugi strani pa je treba zagotoviti, da imajo lokalni gospodarski subjekti potrebno varnost za razvoj svojih poslovnih dejavnosti.
It is appropriate, therefore, that the derogation be granted for a period of six years.
Zato je primerno, da se odstopanje odobri za šest let.
Furthermore, the production of a mid-term report should be required, so that the Commission can assess whether the conditions justifying the granting of such a derogation continue to be fulfilled.
Poleg tega je treba zahtevati predložitev vmesnega poročila, da bi lahko Komisija ocenila, ali so še vedno izpolnjeni pogoji za upravičenost takšnega odstopanja.
The measures provided for in this Decision should be without prejudice to the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty,
Ukrepi iz te odločbe ne smejo vplivati na uporabo členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe –
The term ‘independent brewery’ shall mean a brewery which is legally and economically independent of any other brewery, which uses premises situated physically apart from those of any other brewery and does not operate under licence.
Izraz „neodvisna pivovarna“ pomeni pivovarno, ki je pravno in ekonomsko neodvisna od katere koli druge pivovarne, uporablja prostore, ki so fizično ločeni od prostorov katere koli druge pivovarne in nima licence.
However, where two or more breweries cooperate, and their combined annual production does not exceed 300000 hectolitres, those breweries may be treated as a single independent brewery.
Kadar pa dve ali več pivovarn sodeluje in njihova skupna letna proizvodnja ne presega 300000 hektolitrov, se te pivovarne lahko obravnavajo kot ena neodvisna pivovarna.
The reduced excise duty rate, which may fall below the minimum rate, shall not be set more than 50 % lower than the standard national excise duty rate for Portugal.
Nižja trošarinska stopnja, ki je lahko pod najnižjo stopnjo, ne sme biti za več kot 50 % nižja od standardne nacionalne trošarinske stopnje za Portugalsko.
By 31 December 2010, Portugal shall send the Commission a report on the situation, to enable it to assess whether the reasons justifying the derogation provided for in Article 1 still exist.
Portugalska do 31. decembra 2010 pošlje Komisiji poročilo o stanju, ki bo Komisiji omogočilo oceniti, ali še vedno obstajajo razlogi za upravičenost odstopanja iz člena 1.
This Decision shall apply until 31 December 2013.
Ta odločba se uporablja do 31. decembra 2013.
Done at Brussels, 3 June 2008.
V Bruslju, 3. junija 2008
Opinion of 11 April 2008 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 11. aprila 2008 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
Directive as amended by the 2005 Act of Accession.
Direktiva, kakor je bila spremenjena z Aktom o pristopu iz leta 2005.
By a request dated 30 May 2007 and referring to Article 299(2) of the Treaty, Portugal seeks a derogation from Article 90 of the Treaty in order to apply a rate of excise duty, lower than the national rate set in accordance with Council Directive 92/84/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the approximation of the rates of excise duty on alcohol and alcoholic beverages [2] to beer produced in Madeira, in cases where the annual production of the brewery does not exceed 300000 hectolitres.
Portugalska z zahtevkom z dne 30. maja 2007 in s sklicevanjem na člen 299(2) Pogodbe prosi za odstopanje od člena 90 Pogodbe, da bi uporabila nižjo trošarinsko stopnjo od nacionalne stopnje, določene v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 92/84/EGS z dne 19. oktobra 1992 o približevanju trošarinskih stopenj za alkohol in alkoholne pijače [2], za pivo, proizvedeno na Madeiri, kadar letna proizvodnja pivovarne ne presega 300000 hektolitrov.
Production in excess of 200000 hectolitres would benefit from the reduced only to the extent it is consumed locally.
Proizvodnja, ki presega 200000 hektolitrov, naj bi bila do nižje stopnje upravičena samo, če se porabi lokalno.
Portugal has made use of this provision, applying a 50 % reduction to breweries whose annual production does not exceed 200000 hectolitres.
Portugalska je uporabila to določbo in uvedla 50-odstotno znižanje za pivovarne, katerih letna proizvodnja ne presega 200000 hektolitrov.
However, it does not signify that breweries located in Madeira that reach production in excess of that threshold would be in a sufficiently strong position to face up to competition from beers from mainland Portugal (or mainland Europe).
Če pa bi pivovarne na Madeiri dosegle proizvodnjo, ki presega navedeni prag, to ne bi pomenilo, da so v dovolj močnem položaju za konkuriranje pivu s celinskega dela Portugalske (ali celinskega dela Evrope).
Portugal therefore requests that the entitlement to a reduced rate, which would be set at 50 % below the standard national rate, should be available to beer produced locally by independent brewers situated in Madeira whose annual production does not exceed 300000 hectolitres.
Portugalska zato prosi, da je upravičenost do nižje stopnje, ki je za 50 % nižja od standardne nacionalne stopnje, na voljo za pivo, ki ga lokalno proizvedejo neodvisni pivovarji na Madeiri, katerih letna proizvodnja ne presega 300000 hektolitrov.
However, where annual production exceeds 200000 hectolitres the entitlement to a reduced rate for quantities in excess of this figure will only apply to beer which is to be consumed locally in Madeira.
Vendar pa bo, kadar letna proizvodnja presega 200000 hektolitrov, upravičenost do nižje stopnje za količine, ki presegajo to številko, veljala samo za pivo, ki se bo porabilo lokalno na Madeiri.
By way of derogation from Article 90 of the Treaty, Portugal is authorised to apply a rate of excise duty lower than the national rate fixed in accordance with Directive 92/84/EEC in the case of beer produced in the autonomous region of Madeira by independent breweries situated in that region, whose total annual production does not exceed 300000 hectolitres.
Z odstopanjem od člena 90 Pogodbe se Portugalski dovoli, da uporabi nižjo trošarinsko stopnjo od nacionalne stopnje, določene v skladu z Direktivo 92/84/EGS, za pivo, ki ga v avtonomni pokrajini Madeira proizvedejo neodvisne pivovarne, ki ležijo v navedeni pokrajini in katerih skupna letna proizvodnja ne presega 300000 hektolitrov.
Production in excess of 200000 hectolitres annually may benefit from the reduced rate only to the extent it is consumed locally in Madeira.
Proizvodnja, ki presega 200000 hektolitrov na leto, je lahko upravičena do nižje stopnje samo, če se porabi lokalno na Madeiri.
of 29 May 2008
z dne 29. maja 2008
on a financial contribution from the Community towards emergency measures to combat bluetongue in the United Kingdom in 2007
o finančnem prispevku Skupnosti za nujne ukrepe za boj proti bolezni modrikastega jezika v Združenem kraljestvu leta 2007
(notified under document number C(2008) 2161)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 2161)
Having regard to Council Directive 2000/75/EC of 20 November 2000 laying down specific provisions for the control and eradication of bluetongue [1] and in particular Article 9(2),
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2000/75/ES z dne 20. novembra 2000 o določitvi posebnih določb za boj zoper in izkoreninjenje bolezni modrikastega jezika [1] in zlasti člena 9(2) Direktive,
Having regard to Council Decision 90/424/EEC of 26 June 1990 on expenditure in the veterinary field [2], and in particular Article 3(3) and Article 3(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 90/424/EGS z dne 26. junija 1990 o odhodkih na področju veterine [2] ter zlasti člena 3(3) in člena 3(5) Odločbe,
With a view to helping to eradicate bluetongue as rapidly as possible, Member States shall obtain a financial contribution towards the costs of certain measures to combat outbreaks of bluetongue.
Države članice prejmejo finančni prispevek za kritje stroškov nekaterih ukrepov za boj proti izbruhom bolezni modrikastega jezika z namenom, da bi prispevale k čimprejšnjemu izkoreninjenju bolezni modrikastega jezika.
Article 3(5) of Decision 90/424/EEC lay down rules on the percentage of the costs incurred by the Member State that may be covered by the Community’s financial contribution.
Člen 3(5) Odločbe 90/424/EGS določa pravila glede deleža stroškov držav članic, ki se lahko krije s finančnim prispevkom Skupnosti.
The payment of a Community financial contribution towards emergency measures to combat bluetongue is subject to the rules laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 349/2005 of 28 February 2005 laying down rules on the Community financing of emergency measures and of the campaign to combat certain animal diseases under Council Decision 90/424/EEC [3].
Za plačilo finančnega prispevka Skupnosti za nujne ukrepe za boj proti bolezni modrikastega jezika veljajo pravila, določena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 349/2005 z dne 28. februarja 2005 o določitvi pravil v zvezi s financiranjem Skupnosti nujnih ukrepov in ukrepov za boj proti nekaterim živalskim boleznim iz Odločbe Sveta 90/424/EGS [3].
An outbreak of bluetongue occurred in the United Kingdom in 2007.
Leta 2007 je prišlo do izbruha bolezni modrikastega jezika v Združenem kraljestvu.
Accordingly, the United Kingdom took the necessary emergency measures in order to avoid the spread of bluetongue.
Zato je Združeno kraljestvo uvedlo potrebne nujne ukrepe, da bi se preprečilo širjenje bolezni modrikastega jezika.
On 28 November 2007, the United Kingdom provided the financial information required prior to the granting of Community financial support in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 349/2005.
Združeno kraljestvo je 28. novembra 2007 predložilo finančne informacije, ki so potrebne pred odobritvijo finančnega prispevka Skupnosti v skladu s členom 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 349/2005.
The United Kingdom has fully complied with its technical and administrative obligations as set out in Article 3 of Decision 90/424/EEC and Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 349/2005.
Združeno kraljestvo je v celoti izpolnilo tehnične in upravne obveznosti iz člena 3 Odločbe 90/424/EGS in člena 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 349/2005.
Without prejudice to Article 10a of Decision 90/424/EEC, a financial contribution from the Community may be granted to the United Kingdom towards the costs incurred by that Member State in taking the measures referred to in Article 3(2) of Decision 90/424/EEC to combat bluetongue in 2007.
Brez poseganja v določbe člena 10a Odločbe 90/424/EGS se Združenemu kraljestvu lahko dodeli finančni prispevek Skupnosti za kritje stroškov, ki jih je ta država članica imela v letu 2007 zaradi uvedbe ukrepov iz člena 3(2) Odločbe 90/424/EGS za boj proti bolezni modrikastega jezika.
Done at Brussels, 29 May 2008.
V Bruslju, 29. maja 2008
Decision as last amended by Commission Decision 2007/729/EC (OJ L 294, 13.11.2007, p. 26).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo Komisije 2007/729/ES (UL L 294, 13.11.2007, str. 26).
of 30 May 2008
z dne 30. maja 2008
amending Decision 2008/377/EC concerning certain protection measures relating to classical swine fever in Slovakia
o spremembi Odločbe 2008/377/ES o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo na Slovaškem
(notified under document number C(2008) 2262)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 2262)
Outbreaks of Classical Swine Fever have occurred in Slovakia, which in view of the trade in live pigs and certain pig products are liable to endanger the porcine herds of other Members States.
Na Slovaškem je prišlo do izbruhov klasične prašičje kuge, ki zaradi trgovine z živimi prašiči in nekaterimi prašičjimi proizvodi lahko ogrozi prašičje črede drugih držav članic.
Commission Decision 2008/377/EC of 8 May 2008 concerning certain protection measures relating to Classical Swine Fever in Slovakia [2] was adopted in order to reinforce the measures taken by Slovakia within the framework of Council Directive 2001/89/EC of 23 October 2001 on Community measures for the control of Classical Swine Fever [3].
Odločba Komisije 2008/377/ES z dne 8. maja 2008 o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo na Slovaškem [2] je bila sprejeta, da se okrepijo ukrepi, ki jih je Slovaška sprejela v okviru Direktive Sveta 2001/89/ES z dne 23. oktobra 2001 o ukrepih Skupnosti za nadzor nad klasično prašičjo kugo [3].
Article 2(2)(p) of Council Directive 64/432/EEC of 26 June 1964 on animal health problems affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine [4] defines a ‘kraj’ as the administrative region of Slovakia which is at least 2000 km2 in area and which is subject to inspection by the competent authorities.
V členu 2(2)(p) Direktive Sveta 64/432/EGS z dne 26. junija 1964 o problemih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki vplivajo na trgovino z govedom in prašiči znotraj Skupnosti [4], je „kraj“ opredeljen kot upravna regija na Slovaškem s površino vsaj 2000 km2, ki jo nadzirajo pristojni organi.
Based on the results of the epidemiological inquiry carried out by the competent authorities in Slovakia it is appropriate to provide that protection measures relating to Classical Swine Fever in Slovakia should apply to certain administrative regions (kraj).
Na podlagi epidemiološke poizvedbe, ki so jo opravili pristojni organi na Slovaškem, je primerno zagotoviti, da se zaščitni ukrepi v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo na Slovaškem uporabljajo za nekatere upravne regije („kraj“).
Decision 2008/377/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 2008/377/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The Annex to Decision 2008/377/EC is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga k Odločbi 2008/377/ES se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge k tej odločbi.
Done at Brussels, 30 May 2008.
V Bruslju, 30. maja 2008
Directive as last amended by Decision 2006/965/EC (OJ L 397, 30.12.2006, p. 22).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2006/965/ES (UL L 397, 30.12.2006, str. 22).
OJ L 130, 20.5.2008, p. 18.
UL L 130, 20.5.2008, str. 18.
The following administrative regions in Slovakia:
Naslednji upravni regiji na Slovaškem:
Nitra Region (Nitriansky kraj)’
Nitra (Nitriansky kraj)“
of 5 June 2008
z dne 5. junija 2008
on the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in the Swiss Confederation
o uporabi določb schengenskega pravnega reda, ki se navezujejo na schengenski informacijski sistem, v Švicarski konfederaciji