natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the reference to ‘Western Samoa’ shall be replaced by a reference to ‘Samoa’;
„Zahodna Samoa“ nadomesti s „Samoa“;
the following Part shall be added:
doda se naslednji del 3:
BRITISH CITIZENS WHO ARE NOT NATIONALS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND FOR THE PURPOSES OF COMMUNITY LAW:
BRITANSKI DRŽAVLJANI, KI NISO DRŽAVLJANI ZDRUŽENEGA KRALJESTVA VELIKE BRITANIJE IN SEVERNE IRSKE ZA NAMENE PRAVA SKUPNOSTI:
British overseas territories citizens who do not have the right of abode in the United Kingdom
državljani britanskih čezmorskih ozemelj, ki nimajo pravice do stalne naselitve v Združenem kraljestvu
British overseas citizens
britanski čezmorski državljani
British subjects who do not have the right of abode in the United Kingdom
britanske osebe, ki nimajo pravice do stalne naselitve v Združenem kraljestvu
British protected persons’;
britanske zaščitene osebe“;
the reference to Bolivia shall be deleted;
črta „Bolivija“;
the following references shall be inserted:
vstavijo:
‘Antigua and Barbuda (*)
„Antigva in Barbuda(*)“
Bahamas (*)
„Bahami(*)“
Barbados (*)
„Barbados(*)“
Mauritius (*)
„Mauritius(*)“
Saint Kitts and Nevis (*)
„Saint Kitts in Nevis(*)“
Seychelles (*)’;
„Sejšeli(*)“;
the following footnote shall be inserted:
vstavi se naslednja opomba:
The exemption from the visa requirement will apply from the date of entry into force of an agreement on visa exemption to be concluded with the European Community.’;
Izvzetje iz vizumske obveznosti se bo začelo uporabljati od dne začetka veljavnosti sporazuma o izvzetju iz vizumske obveznosti, sklenjenega z Evropsko skupnostjo.“;
the reference to ‘Brunei’ shall be replaced by a reference to ‘Brunei Darussalam’;
„Brunej“ se nadomesti z „Brunej-Darussalam“;
British nationals (overseas)’.
britanski državljani (prekomorski)“.
Member States shall apply the visa requirement for Bolivian nationals with effect from 1 April 2007.
Države članice začnejo uporabljati vizumsko obveznost za bolivijske državljane z učinkom od 1. aprila 2007.
Member States shall apply the exemption from the visa requirement for nationals of Antigua and Barbuda, the Bahamas, Barbados, Mauritius, Saint Kitts and Nevis and the Seychelles from the date of entry into force of an agreement on visa exemptions to be concluded by the European Community with the third country in question.
Države članice začnejo uporabljati izvzetje iz vizumske obveznosti za državljane Antigve in Barbude, Bahamov, Barbadosa, Mauritiusa, Saint Kitts in Nevisa ter Sejšelov od dneva začetka veljavnosti sporazuma o izvzetju iz vizumske obveznosti, ki ga z zadevno tretjo državo sklene Evropska skupnost.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 851/2005 (OJ L 141, 4.6.2005, p. 3).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo 851/2005 (UL L 141, 4.6.2005, str. 3).
OJ L 176, 10.7.1999, p. 31.
UL L 176, 10.7.99, str. 31.
OJ L 405, 20.12.2006, p. 1.
UL L 405, 30.12.2006, str. 1.
OJ L 327, 19.12.1994, p. 1.’;
UL L 327, 19.12.1994, str. 1.“;
Regulation as amended by Decision 2004/927/EC (OJ L 396, 31.12.2004, p. 45).’;
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena s Sklepom 2004/927/ES (UL L 396, 31.12.2004, str. 45).“;
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1933/2006 of 21 December 2006 temporarily withdrawing access to the generalised tariff preferences from the Republic of Belarus
Popravek Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1933/2006 z dne 21. decembra 2006 o začasnem preklicu dostopa Republike Belorusije do splošnih tarifnih preferencialov
Regulation (EC) No 1933/2006 should read as follows:
Uredba (ES) 1993/2006 se glasi:
Council Regulation (EC) No 1933/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1933/2006
temporarily withdrawing access to the generalised tariff preferences from the Republic of Belarus
o začasnem preklicu dostopa Republike Belorusije do splošnih tarifnih preferencialov
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 of 27 June 2005 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences, and in particular Article 20(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 980/2005 z dne 27. junija 2005 o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov in zlasti člena 20(4) Uredbe,
Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 980/2005, the Republic of Belarus (hereinafter referred to as Belarus) is a beneficiary country of the Community's scheme of generalised tariff preferences.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 980/2005 je Republika Belorusija (v nadaljevanju „Belorusija“) država upravičenka sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov Skupnosti.
On 29 January 2003, the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU), the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) and the World Confederation of Labour (WCL) made a joint request to the Commission for an investigation to be made under Article 27 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 of 10 December 2001 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004 — Statements on a Council Regulation applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004 into alleged violations of the freedom of association and of the right to collective bargaining in Belarus.
Mednarodna zveza svobodnih sindikatov (ICFTU), Evropska zveza sindikatov (ETUC) in Svetovna delavska zveza (WCL) so 29. januarja 2003 Komisiji predložili skupno zahtevo za preiskavo domnevnih kršitev svobode združevanja in pravice do pogajanj za sklenitev kolektivnih pogodb v Belorusiji v skladu s členom 27 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2501/2001 z dne 10. decembra 2001 o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov v obdobju od 1. januarja 2002 do 31. decembra 2004 – Izjave o Uredbi Sveta o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov v obdobju od 1. januarja 2002 do 31. decembra 2004.
The Commission examined the request in consultation with the Generalised Preferences Committee and decided, by Decision of 29 December 2003, to initiate an investigation.
Komisija je po posvetovanju z Odborom za splošne preferenciale proučila zahtevo in s Sklepom z dne 29. decembra 2003 uvedla preiskavo.
Information from interested parties was sought, by means of a published notice.
Z objavo obvestila so bile vse zainteresirane strani pozvane, da predložijo informacije.
The Belarussian authorities were formally notified of the opening of the investigation.
Beloruski organi so bili uradno obveščeni o začetku preiskave.
They denied any violations of International Labour Organisation (ILO) Conventions No 87 (concerning Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise) and No 98 (concerning the Application of the Principles of the Right to Organise and to Bargain Collectively).
Zanikali so vsakršno kršitev konvencij Mednarodne organizacije dela (ILO) št. 87 (o svobodi združevanja in varstvu pravice do organiziranja) in št. 98 (o pravici do organiziranja in do pogajanj za sklenitev kolektivnih pogodb).
The information collected by the Commission during the course of the investigation conducted in consultation with the Generalised Preferences Committee, however, corroborated the existence of serious and systematic violations of the freedom of association and of the right to collective bargaining under ILO Conventions No 87 and No 98.
Vendar pa so informacije, ki jih je Komisija zbrala med preiskavo, izvedeno po posvetovanju z Odborom za splošne preferenciale, potrdile obstoj resnih in sistematičnih kršitev svobode združevanja ter pravice do pogajanj za sklenitev kolektivnih pogodb v okviru Konvencij ILO št. 87 in št. 98.
Among other things, the Commission learned that ILO examined the situation in Belarus with respect to the two conventions and had started its own respective investigation in November 2003.
Med drugim je Komisija izvedela, da je ILO proučila razmere v zvezi z dvema konvencijama v Belorusiji in novembra 2003 uvedla svojo preiskavo.
The resulting ILO Commission of Inquiry report of July 2004 contained 12 recommendations to undertake specific steps to improve the situation in Belarus.
Julijsko poročilo preiskovalne komisije ILO za leto 2004 je vsebovalo 12 priporočil za posebne ukrepe za izboljšanje razmer v Belorusiji.
Belarus was urged to implement these recommendations by 1 June 2005, but no implementation took place.
Država je bila pozvana, da do 1. junija 2005 izpolni ta priporočila, vendar niso bila izvedena.
Based on this information and its own review, the Commission considered that a temporary withdrawal of the preferential arrangement was justified.
Na podlagi teh informacij in lastnega pregleda je Komisija menila, da je začasen preklic preferencialnega režima upravičen.
On 17 August 2005, the Commission decided to monitor and evaluate the labour rights situation in Belarus.
Komisija je 17. avgusta 2005 sklenila, da bo spremljala in ocenila stanje delovnopravnih pravic v Belorusiji.
The announcement of the start of the six-month period of monitoring and evaluation included a statement of the Commission's intention to submit a proposal to the Council for the temporary withdrawal of the trade preferences, unless, before the end of the period, Belarus had made a commitment to take the measures necessary to conform with the principles referred to in the 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, as expressed in the twelve recommendations in the ILO Commission of Inquiry report of July 2004.
Napoved začetka šestmesečnega obdobja za tako spremljanje in ocenjevanje je vključevala izjavo o nameri Komisije, da Svetu predloži predlog o začasnem preklicu trgovinskih preferencialov, razen če se Belorusija pred koncem obdobja zaveže sprejeti potrebne ukrepe, s katerimi bo zagotovila uskladitev z načeli iz Deklaracije ILO iz leta 1998 o temeljnih načelih in pravicah pri delu, kot so bila izražena v dvanajstih priporočilih poročila preiskovalne komisije ILO iz julijskega poročila za leto 2004.
The Belarussian authorities were notified officially of the decision and of the announcement.
Beloruski organi so bili uradno obveščeni o tej odločitvi in napovedi.
Belarus did not make the requisite commitment within the six-month period of monitoring and evaluation, nor, as described below, during the months which followed.
Belorusija v šestmesečnem obdobju spremljanja in ocenjevanja niti v naslednjih mesecih ni izpolnila potrebnih zavez, kot je opisano v nadaljevanju.
Instead, on 30 March 2006, Belarussian authorities presented to the Commission a submission on the situation of freedom of association rights in Belarus.
Vendar pa so beloruski organi oblasti 30. marca 2006 Komisiji predložili poročilo o stanju glede svobode združevanja v Belorusiji.
The Commission analysed that submission, but concluded that it did not provide sufficient evidence of commitment.
Komisija je to poročilo proučila, vendar po njenem mnenju ni vsebovalo zadostnih dokazov o izpolnitvi zavez.
In the meantime, the ILO Governing Body adopted the Committee on Freedom of Association (CFA) follow-up report in March 2006, in which the CFA pointed to the actual worsening of the situation of trade unions' rights in Belarus and urged the Belarussian authorities to take concrete measures immediately.
Marca 2006 je upravljavski organ ILO sprejel poročilo o nadaljnjem spremljanju Odbora za svobodno združevanje (CFA), v katerem je CFA opozoril na dejansko poslabšanje razmer na področju pravic sindikatov v Belorusiji in beloruske organe pozval, da nemudoma sprejmejo konkretne ukrepe.
Further, the Commission received a communication, dated 16 May 2006, from the Belarussian authorities on the situation of freedom of association rights in Belarus.
Nato je Komisija od beloruskih organov prejela sporočilo z dne 16. maja 2006 o razmerah glede svobode združevanja v Belorusiji.
Just as with the submission of 30 March 2006, after a careful analysis, the Commission came to the conclusion that that submission did not provide any sign of commitment or a convincing indication that the situation had improved.
Tako kot pri poročilu z dne 30. marca je Komisija po skrbni proučitvi ugotovila, da sporočilo ni vsebovalo nikakršne zaveze ali prepričljivega znaka, da se bodo razmere izboljšale.
This assessment of the situation in Belarus was shared by the ILO Committee on the Application of Standards of the International Labour Conference in its June 2006 report, where it deplored the continued failure by the Belarussian Government to implement the recommendations and stressed the necessity of rapid actions so that real and tangible progress could be noted.
S takšno oceno razmer se je strinjal tudi Odbor ILO v svojem junijskem poročilu o uporabi standardov mednarodne konference dela za leto 2006, v katerem je obžaloval, da beloruske oblasti vztrajno zavračajo izpolnitev zavez in poudaril nujnost takojšnjega ukrepanja, da bi dosegli resničen in konkreten napredek.
Also the June 2006 International Labour Conference, organised under the auspices of ILO, classified the lack of implementation of the 12 recommendations, which Belarus continued to ignore since July 2004, as a case of continued failure.
Tudi na mednarodni konferenci dela, ki je potekala junija 2006 pod pokroviteljstvom Mednarodne organizacije dela, je bilo dejstvo, da Belorusija ni ustrezno izpolnila dvanajstih priporočil in da jih zavrača že od julija 2004, opredeljeno kot primer trajne kršitve.
This exceptional classification is only used for very serious and systematic cases of non compliance with a ratified convention.
Takšna izredna opredelitev se uporablja samo v primerih zelo resnih in sistematičnih kršitev ratificirane konvencije.
The Commission has carefully analysed recent developments in Belarus, including a letter from Belarus dated 14 October 2006 and submitted to the Commission on 17 October 2006.
Komisija je skrbno proučila trenuten razvoj dogodkov, vključno s pismom z dne 14. oktobra 2006, ki ga je od beloruskih organov prejela 17. oktobra 2006.
Instead of producing any effective commitment or clear evidence that the situation has improved, that letter, once again, puts forward possible intentions, but contains no indication of effective implementation of the principles of ILO Conventions No 87 and No 98.
Slednji v pismu niso navedli učinkovitih zavez ali jasnih dokazov o izboljšanju stanja, ampak le možne namere, ne pa tudi konkretnih znakov učinkovitega izvajanja načel konvencij ILO št. 87 in št. 98.
The violations of principles laid down in the ILO Conventions No 87 and No 98 continue to exist.
Načela iz konvencij ILO št. 87 in 98 se še vedno kršijo.
In the light of the foregoing the preferential arrangement for products originating in Belarus should be withdrawn temporarily, until it is decided that the reasons justifying the temporary withdrawal no longer prevail.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je treba preferencialni režim za izdelke s poreklom iz Belorusije začasno preklicati, dokler ni sklenjeno, da ni več razlogov, ki upravičujejo začasen preklic.
This Regulation should enter into force six months after its adoption, unless it is decided before then that the reasons justifying it no longer prevail,
Ta uredba mora začeti veljati šest mesecev po njenem sprejetju, razen, če je bilo pred tem sklenjeno, da ni več razlogov, ki upravičujejo začasen preklic –
The preferential arrangement for products originating in Belarus provided for in Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 shall be withdrawn temporarily.
Preferencialni režim za izdelke s poreklom iz Belorusije iz Uredbe (ES) št. 980/2005 se začasno prekliče.
The Council, acting by qualified majority, on a proposal from the Commission, shall re-establish the preferential arrangement for products originating in Belarus, if the violations of the freedom of association and of the right to collective bargaining in Belarus no longer exist.
Svet s kvalificirano večino na predlog Komisije ponovno vzpostavi preferencialni režim za izdelke s poreklom iz Belorusije, če je Belorusija prenehala kršiti svobodo združevanja in pravico do pogajanj za sklenitev kolektivnih pogodb.
This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 June 2007.
Ta uredba začne veljati 21. junija 2007.
OJ L 346, 31.12.2001, p. 1.
UL L 346, 31.12. 2001, str. 1.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 980/2005.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 980/2005.
Commission Decision 2004/23/EC of 29 December 2003 providing for the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Article 27(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 with respect to the violation of freedom of association in Belarus (OJ L 5, 9.1.2004, p. 90).
Sklep Komisije 2004/23/ES z dne 29. decembra 2003 o uvedbi preiskave v skladu s členom 27(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2501/2001 glede kršitve svobode združevanja v Belorusiji (UL L 5, 9.1.2004, str. 90).
OJ C 40, 14.2.2004, p. 4.
UL C 40, 14.2.2004, str. 4.
Commission Decision 2005/616/EC of 17 August 2005 on the monitoring and evaluation of the labour rights situation in Belarus for temporary withdrawal of trade preferences (OJ L 213, 18.8.2005, p. 16).
Sklep Komisije 2005/616/ES z dne 17. avgusta 2005 o spremljanju in ocenitvi položaja delavskih pravic v Belorusiji za začasni preklic trgovinskih preferencialov (UL L 213, 18.8.2005, str. 16).
OJ C 240, 30.9.2005, p. 41.
UL C 240, 30.9.2005, str. 41.
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1934/2006 of 21 December 2006 establishing a financing instrument for cooperation with industrialised and other high-income countries and territories
Popravek Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1934/2006 z dne 21. decembra 2006 o oblikovanju instrumenta za financiranje sodelovanja z industrializiranimi državami in ozemlji ter drugimi državami in ozemlji z visokim dohodkom
Regulation (EC) No 1934/2006 should read as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 1934/2006 se glasi:
Council Regulation (EC) No 1934/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1934/2006
establishing a financing instrument for cooperation with industrialised and other high-income countries and territories
o oblikovanju instrumenta za financiranje sodelovanja z industrializiranimi državami in ozemlji ter drugimi državami in ozemlji z visokim dohodkom
Over the past decade, the Community has consistently strengthened its bilateral relations with a broad range of industrialised and other high-income countries and territories across different regions of the world, primarily in North America, East Asia and Australasia, but also in South-East Asia and the Gulf region.
V preteklem desetletju je Skupnost nenehno krepila svoje dvostranske odnose s številnimi industrializiranimi državami in ozemlji ter drugimi državami in ozemlji z visokim dohodkom v različnih delih sveta, predvsem v severni Ameriki, vzhodni Aziji ter Avstraliji in Oceaniji, prav tako pa tudi v jugovzhodni Aziji in na območju Zaliva.
Furthermore, these relations have developed to embrace a widening array of subjects and areas in the economic sphere and beyond.
Poleg tega so se ti odnosi razvili, tako da trenutno obsegajo vse širši sklop vsebin in dejavnosti s področja gospodarstva ter drugih področij.
It is in the Community's interest to further deepen its relations with industrialised countries and territories with which it often shares similar political, economic and institutional structures and values and which are important bilateral political and trading partners as well as players in multilateral fora and in global governance.
V interesu Skupnosti je, da nadalje poglablja odnose z industrializiranimi državami in ozemlji, ki imajo pogosto podobne politične, gospodarske in institucionalne strukture in vrednote ter so pomembni dvostranski politični in trgovinski partnerji, poleg tega pa so tudi akterji v večstranskih forumih in v politiki svetovnega reda.
This will be an important factor in strengthening the European Union's role and place in the world, consolidating multilateral institutions and in contributing to balance and in developing the world economy and the international system.
To je pomemben dejavnik v utrjevanju vloge in položaja Evropske unije v svetu, pri krepitvi večstranskih institucij ter spodbujanju ravnovesja in razvoja svetovne ekonomije in mednarodnega sistema.
The European Union and industrialised and other high-income countries and territories have agreed to strengthen their relationship and to cooperate across the areas in which they have shared interests through a variety of bilateral instruments such as agreements, declarations, action plans and other similar documents.
Evropska unija ter industrializirane države in ozemlja ter druge države in ozemlja z visokim dohodkom so se dogovorili, da bodo krepili medsebojne odnose in sodelovali na področjih v skupnem interesu prek dvostranskih instrumentov, kot so sporazumi, deklaracije, akcijski načrti in drugi podobni dokumenti.
In accordance with the principles laid down in those bilateral instruments, the Community implements a cooperation policy aimed at creating an environment conducive to pursuing and developing its relations with those countries and territories.
V skladu z načeli, določenimi v teh dvostranskih instrumentih, Skupnost izvaja politiko sodelovanja, katere namen je ustvariti okolje, naklonjeno uveljavljanju in razvijanju odnosov s temi državami in ozemlji.
Cooperation activities will help to strengthen the European presence and visibility in these countries and encourage economic, commercial, academic, cultural and other exchanges and interaction between a diversified range of actors on each side.
Dejavnosti sodelovanja bodo prispevale h krepitvi evropske prisotnosti in prepoznavnosti v teh državah ter spodbujale gospodarske, trgovinske, akademske, kulturne in druge izmenjave ter medsebojne vplive najrazličnejših akterjev z obeh strani.
The European Union is founded on the principles of democracy, the rule of law, good governance, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.
Evropska unija temelji na načelih demokracije, pravne države, dobrega upravljanja ter spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin.
Community action under this Regulation should contribute to the general objective of developing and consolidating these principles in partner countries and regions through dialogue and cooperation.
Ukrepanje Skupnosti v skladu s to uredbo bi moralo s pomočjo dialoga in sodelovanja prispevati k splošnemu cilju razvoja in utrjevanja teh načel v partnerskih državah ter regijah.
The promotion of diversified bilateral cooperation initiatives with industrialised and other high-income countries and territories within a single instrument will allow economies of scale, synergy effects, greater effectiveness and visibility for the Community action.
Spodbujanje raznolikih dvostranskih pobud za sodelovanje z industrializiranimi državami in ozemlji ter drugimi državami in ozemlji z visokim dohodkom v okviru enega samega instrumenta bo omogočilo ekonomijo obsega, učinke sinergije, večjo učinkovitost in prepoznavnost ukrepov Skupnosti.
In order to achieve the objectives of this Regulation it is necessary to pursue a differentiated approach and to design cooperation with partner countries taking account of their economic, social and political contexts as well as of the Community's specific interests, strategies and priorities.
Da bi dosegli cilje te uredbe, bi bilo treba uporabiti diferenciran pristop in oblikovati sodelovanje s partnerskimi državami ob upoštevanju njihovih gospodarskih, družbenih in političnih razmer ter posebnih interesov, strategij in prednostnih nalog Skupnosti.
This Regulation makes it necessary to repeal Council Regulation (EC) No 382/2001 of 26 February 2001 concerning the implementation of projects promoting cooperation and commercial relations between the European Union and the industrialised countries of North America, the Far East and Australasia and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1035/1999.
Zaradi te uredbe bi bilo treba razveljaviti Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 382/2001 z dne 26. februarja 2001 o izvajanju projektov spodbujanja sodelovanja ter trgovinskih odnosov med Evropsko unijo in industrializiranimi državami Severne Amerike, Daljnega vzhoda, Avstralije in Oceanije.