natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The fact that the company operated at a fraction of its full capacity of production does not mean that costs arising from such facilities are not incurred.
Dejstvo, da je družba delovala le z delom svoje polne proizvodne zmogljivosti, pa ne pomeni, da taki proizvodni obrati niso povzročali stroškov.
Indeed, such costs were booked in the company's accounting records and since they were directly linked to production of the like product, a correction of the reported cost of manufacturing had to be done.
Taki stroški so bili dejansko knjiženi v računovodski evidenci družbe in ker so neposredno povezani s proizvodnjo podobnega izdelka, je treba popraviti predložene proizvodne stroške.
In the absence of domestic sales of the like product and data on the same general category of products, during the investigation period, SG&A expenses were determined in accordance with Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Ker v obdobju preiskave ni bilo domače prodaje podobnega izdelka in podatkov o enaki splošni kategoriji izdelkov, so se stroški PSA določili v skladu s členom 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe.
In particular, SG&A expenses were based on total sales of all products on the domestic market.
Natančneje, stroški PSA so temeljili na skupni prodaji vseh izdelkov na domačem trgu.
Such expenses were added to the company's own average cost of manufacturing, of each exported type, during the investigation period.
Taki stroški so se za vsako izvoženo vrsto izdelka dodali povprečnim proizvodnim stroškom družbe med obdobjem preiskave.
With regard to profit, and in the absence of any other reasonable basis, a profit margin of 5 % was used.
V zvezi z dobičkom in ker ni bilo nobene druge ustrezne podlage, se je uporabila 5 % stopnja dobička.
No information was available which would indicate that such profit margin exceeds the profit normally realized by other exporters or producers on sales of products of the same general category in the domestic market of Malaysia, as required by Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Na voljo ni bilo nobenih informacij, ki bi nakazovale, da takšna stopnja dobička presega dobiček, ki ga imajo ponavadi drugi izvozniki ali proizvajalci pri prodaji izdelka enake splošne kategorije na domačem trgu v Maleziji, kakor zahteva člen 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe.
A second co-operating exporting producer had representative domestic sales of the like product in its domestic market.
Drugi sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik je imel reprezentativno domačo prodajo podobnega izdelka na svojem domačem trgu.
However, sales in the ordinary course of trade were not made in sufficient quantities for normal value to be based on actual domestic prices.
Vendar pa prodaja v običajnem teku trgovine ni bila dovolj obsežna, da bi normalna vrednost lahko temeljila na dejanskih domačih cenah.
Therefore, normal value had to be constructed.
Zato se je morala določiti normalna vrednost.
In accordance with Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation, SG&A expenses were based on the company's actual data pertaining to production and sales, of the like product.
Stroški PSA so v skladu s členom 2(6) osnovne uredbe temeljili na dejanskih podatkih družbe za proizvodnjo in prodajo podobnega izdelka.
For profit, in line with the other exporting producer, a 5 % margin was used.
Za dobiček se je v skladu z drugim proizvajalcem izvoznikom uporabila 5 % stopnja.
Both exporting producers sold directly to independent customers in the Community.
Oba proizvajalca izvoznika sta prodala neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti.
Therefore, export prices were established on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable in the Community in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Izvozne cene so zato bile določene na podlagi cen, ki so bile dejansko plačane ali se plačujejo v Skupnosti, v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
To ensure a fair comparison, allowances were made for differences in transport, insurance, handling, loading and ancillary costs, credit costs and commissions where applicable and justified.
Da bi zagotovili pošteno primerjavo, so bila izvedena nadomestila za razlike v prevozu, zavarovanju, rokovanju, nalaganju, pomožnih stroških, kreditnih stroških in provizijah, kjer je to veljavno in upravičeno.
The provisional dumping margins established, expressed as a percentage of the CIF import price at the Community frontier duty unpaid are the following:
Ugotovljene začasne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek uvozne cene CIF na meji Skupnosti, dajatev neplačana, so:
All other companies 23,0 %
vse druge družbe 23,0%
Questionnaire replies were received from the four exporting producers selected in the sample, as well as from one related company in the exporting country.
Komisija je izpolnjene vprašalnike prejela od štirih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, izbranih v vzorcu, in od ene povezane družbe v državi izvoznici.
One Taiwanese producer replied to the sampling form and requested that an individual duty be established.
En tajvanski proizvajalec je odgovoril na obrazec za vzorčenje in zahteval, da se določi individualna dajatev.
However, this company had no exports of PSF to the Community during the IP and thus could not be considered as an exporting producer.
Vendar pa ta družba ni imela uvoza RVP v Skupnost v OP in se tako ni mogla šteti za proizvajalca izvoznika.
Consequently, no individual dumping margin could be established for this company and it has to be subject to the provisional residual duty established for all other Taiwanese producers.
Zato za to družbo ni bilo mogoče določiti individualne stopnje dampinga in so zanjo morale veljati začasne preostale dajatve, določene za vse druge tajvanske proizvajalce.
The company was informed of this approach and did not react.
Družba je bila o tem pristopu obveščena, vendar se ni odzvala.
The investigation revealed that two exporting producers selected in the sample provided false and misleading information to the Commission.
Preiskava je pokazala, da sta dva proizvajalca izvoznika, izbrana v vzorcu, Komisiji predložila napačne in zavajajoče informacije.
One exporting producer reported domestic sales quantities and sales values which did not correspond to the actual quantities and values shipped to domestic customers of the like product.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je predložil količine domače prodaje in prodajne vrednosti, ki se niso ujemale z dejanskimi količinami in vrednostmi podobnega izdelka, odpremljenega domačim strankam.
Indeed, for many transactions it was found that the reported quantities were higher and values were lower than those ordered by the domestic customers, as reflected in the company's register in the shipping department.
Dejansko se je za mnoge transakcije odkrilo, da so bile predložene količine višje in vrednosti nižje od tistih, ki so jih naročile domače stranke, kar odraža evidenca družbe v oddelku za odpremo.
It thus had to be concluded that the quantities actually sold were those as ordered by the domestic customer and booked in the shipping register, rather than those reported and contained in the invoices shown to the Commission.
Zato se je moralo skleniti, da so bile dejansko prodane količine tiste, ki jih je naročila domača stranka in so se knjižile v register odpreme, ne pa tiste, ki so bile predložene Komisiji in navedene na prikazanih računih.
Moreover, with regard to the sales values reported, it was also found that the company added fictitious transactions to pretend that the total amount of all invoices under one order matched the total amount of that order.
Poleg tega se je v zvezi s predloženimi prodajnimi vrednostmi izkazalo, da je družba dodala fiktivne transakcije, da bi prikazala skupni znesek vseh računov za eno naročilo, ki se ujema s skupnim zneskom navedenega naročila.
These additional transactions had to be fictitious since they were not reported in the company's actual shipping register.
Te navedene transakcije so morale biti fiktivne, saj niso bile navedene v dejanskem registru odpreme družbe.
It should be noted that for the reported domestic transactions, showing falsified quantities and values and including the fictitious transactions, the company has provided delivery notes and invoices claiming that these were the genuine underlying documents.
Opozoriti je treba, da je družba za sporočene domače transakcije, ki so ponazarjale ponarejene količine in vrednosti ter vključevale fiktivne transakcije, predložila dobavnice in račune ter trdila, da so to resnični dokazni dokumenti.
Given the fact that the reported data was found to be faked it has to be concluded that also the underlying documents were forged in order to be brought in line with the reported falsified information.
Za predložene podatke se je odkrilo, da so lažni, zato se sklene, da so bili tudi dokazni dokumenti ponarejeni, da bi se jih uskladilo s predloženimi napačnimi informacijami.
By thereby manipulating the domestic unit prices and quantities, the company provided false and misleading information to the Commission.
Družba je tako s prirejanjem domače cene na enoto in količine Komisiji predložila zavajajoče informacije.
The other exporting producer was also found to have reported false and misleading information with regard to its domestic sales.
Tudi za drugega proizvajalca izvoznika se je odkrilo, da je glede svoje domače prodaje predložil napačne in zavajajoče informacije.
In particular, the company reported certain product types of domestic transaction that were not the same as the one contained in the customer order and registered in the order book kept by the company's sales department.
Natančneje, družba je predložila domače transakcije v zvezi z nekaterimi vrstami izdelkov, ki niso ustrezale tistim, ki jih je vsebovalo naročilo stranke in je bilo zapisano v knjigi naročil, ki jih hrani oddelek družbe za prodajo.
This was done for the most widely exported types of PSF, therefore misleading the Commission into using domestic prices although the sales concerned were not representative in the sense of Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, given their low volumes.
To je naredila za vrste RVP z največjim izvoznim obsegom in zato zavedla Komisijo, da je uporabila domače cene, čeprav zadevna prodaja glede na njen majhen obseg ni bila reprezentativna v smislu člena 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
Moreover, in order to justify a difference found for one specific transaction which would show that the product type delivered did correspond to the one reported to the Commission, the company provided a falsified document, which was a copy of a signed delivery note which had allegedly been faxed by a customer, at the company's request.
Poleg tega je družba predložila ponarejen dokument, ki je bil kopija podpisane dobavnice in jo je na zahtevo družbe domnevno po faksu poslala stranka. S tem naj bi se upravičila razlika, odkrita za posamezno transakcijo, s čimer bi se pokazalo, da je vrsta dobavljenega izdelka ustrezala tistemu, ki je bil predložen Komisiji.
This document did not correspond to the original which had previously been provided by the company.
Ta dokument pa ni ustrezal originalu, ki ga je družba poslala pred tem.
Indeed, the product types were not the same which indicates that the alleged supporting evidence was fabricated for the purpose of misleading the Commission.
Dejansko vrste izdelkov niso bile enake, kar kaže na to, da so bila domnevna ustrezna dokazila izmišljena z namenom zavajanja Komisije.
In addition, the investigation revealed that it is common practice for companies in Taiwan to keep the delivery notes signed by the customer, as a proof that the quantities ordered were actually delivered.
Poleg tega je preiskava razkrila, da tajvanske družbe ponavadi hranijo dobavnice, podpisane s strani stranke, kot dokazilo, da so bile naročene količine dejansko dostavljene.
This was confirmed by the exporting producer in question and by the other exporting producers visited.
To je potrdil zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik in drugi obiskani proizvajalci izvozniki.
However, even though the Commission specifically requested those delivery notes for the IP, no such documents were made available during the verification visit.
Vendar pa ne glede na to, da je Komisija za OP posebej zahtevala navedene dobavnice, ti dokumenti med preveritvenim obiskom niso bili na voljo.
The company thus did not only refuse to provide necessary documents, but also significantly impeded the investigation.
Družba tako ni le zavrnila zahteve po predložitvi potrebnih dokumentov, ampak je tudi močno ovirala preiskavo.
Given the fact that both companies were able to provide forged delivery notes and invoices to justify domestic transactions, and that such documents are part of an integrated system, it has to be concluded that any document which ties to such system can be manipulated and is therefore unreliable.
Glede na to, da sta obe družbi za upravičevanje domačih transakcij lahko predložili ponarejene dobavnice in račune ter da so navedeni dokumenti del integriranega sistema, se sklene, da je lahko vsak dokument, povezan s takim sistemom, prirejen in zato nezanesljiv.
Furthermore, the nature and extent of the false and misleading information also casts doubt on the integrity of all the data submitted by the companies.
Poleg tega narava in obseg napačnih in zavajajočih informacij mečeta dvom tudi na neoporečnost vseh podatkov, ki sta jih predložili družbi.
Therefore, it has been decided to entirely disregard the information provided by these companies, in line with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Zato se v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe odloči, da se informacije, ki sta jih predložili ti družbi, sploh ne upoštevajo.
The companies were informed forthwith of the basis on which it was intended to disregard the information provided and were given the opportunity to provide further explanations, in accordance with Article 18(4) of the basic Regulation.
Družbi sta bili takoj obveščeni o razlogih, zaradi katerih se je nameravalo neupoštevati predložene informacije, omogočeno pa jima je bilo, da predložita nadaljnje pojasnitve v skladu s členom 18(4) osnovne uredbe.
However, the explanations given by the companies were unsatisfactory and could not refute the evidence showing that they had submitted falsified and misleading information.
Vendar pa so bile pojasnitve družb nezadovoljive in niso mogle ovreči dokaza, da sta predložili napačne in zavajajoče informacije.
The dumping margins were therefore provisionally determined on the basis of facts available, in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Stopnja dampinga je bila zato začasno določena na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
For two co-operating producers, domestic sales of the like product were representative.
Za dva sodelujoča proizvajalca je bila domača prodaja podobnega izdelka reprezentativna.
One exporting producer sold in the domestic market to both related and unrelated customers.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je na domačem trgu prodajal povezanim in nepovezanim strankam.
Sales to the related customer were resold to independent customers.
Prodaja povezani stranki je bila ponovno prodana neodvisni stranki.
Given the fact that these two related companies shared functions with regard to production and sales it was considered appropriate to consider them as one single economic entity.
Glede na to, da sta si ti dve povezani družbi delili dejavnosti v zvezi s proizvodnjo in prodajo, se ju je zdelo primerno upoštevati kot en gospodarski subjekt.
Therefore, wherever possible, normal value was established on the basis of the price paid or payable, in the ordinary course of trade, by the first independent customer.
Zato se je normalna vrednost, kjer koli je bilo to mogoče, določila na podlagi cen, ki jih je prva neodvisna stranka dejansko plačala ali se plačujejo v običajnem poteku trgovine.
For most product types sold by those cooperating producers there were no sufficient domestic sales made in the ordinary course of trade and normal value had to be constructed in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
Za večino vrst izdelkov, ki so jih prodali navedeni sodelujoči proizvajalci, v običajnem poteku trgovine domača prodaja ni bila zadostna in se je normalna vrednost morala konstruirati v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe.
In this case, SG&A and profit were based on actual data pertaining to production and sales, in the ordinary course of trade, of the like product by the exporting producer under investigation, in accordance with the chapeau of Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation.
V tem primeru so stroški PSA in dobiček v skladu z uvodom člena 2(6) osnovne uredbe temeljili na dejanskih podatkih za proizvodnjo in prodajo podobnega izdelka, ki jo je proizvajalec izvoznik v preiskavi izvajal v običajnem poteku trgovine.
For the two co-operating exporting producers export prices were established on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable by unrelated customers in the Community in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Izvozne cene za dva sodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika so bile v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe določene na podlagi cen, ki so jih nepovezani kupci v Skupnosti dejansko plačali ali se plačujejo.
To ensure a fair comparison, allowances were made for differences in transport, insurance, handling, loading and ancillary costs, credit cost, technical assistance costs and commissions where applicable and justified.
Da bi zagotovili pošteno primerjavo, so bila izvedena nadomestila za razlike v prevozu, zavarovanju, rokovanju, nalaganju, pomožnih stroških, kreditnih stroških, stroških tehničnih pomoči in provizijah, kjer je to veljavno in upravičeno.
For cooperating companies not included in the sample, the dumping margin was established on the basis of a weighted average of the dumping margins calculated for the companies selected in the sample, representing more than 12,0 % of Taiwanese exports to the Community.
Za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso bile vključene v vzorec, se je stopnja dampinga določila na podlagi tehtanega povprečja stopenj dampinga družb, izbranih v vzorcu, ki predstavljajo več kot 12 % tajvanskega izvoza v Skupnost.
For this purpose, the dumping margins established for the non-cooperating exporting producers, which were based on the facts available according to Article 18 of the basic Regulation, were not included in the average, as stipulated by Article 9(6) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se stopnje dampinga, določena za nesodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike, ki so temeljile na razpoložljivih podatkih v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe, niso vključile v povprečje, kakor je določeno v členu 9(6) osnovne uredbe.
Cooperating companies not included in the sample 16,5 %
sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec 16,5 %
All other companies 29,5 %
vse druge družbe 29,5 %
During the IP, PSF was manufactured by 18 companies in the Community:
V OP je RVP v Skupnosti proizvajalo 18 družb:
eight complainant Community producers, out of which three fully co-operated with the Commission during the investigation,
osem proizvajalcev pritožnikov v Skupnosti, od katerih so trije med preiskavo v celoti sodelovali s Komisijo,
six producers, which fully supported the complaint but did not co-operate in the proceeding,
šest proizvajalcev, ki so v celoti podpirali pritožbo, vendar v postopku niso sodelovali,
four producers which remained silent at the complaint stage and did not co-operate in the proceeding.
štirje proizvajalci, ki se na stopnji pritožbe niso oglasili in niso sodelovali v postopku.
On the above basis, it was considered that the PSF produced by all the above mentioned companies constitute the total Community production within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je bilo ugotovljeno, da RVP, ki ga proizvajajo vse zgoraj navedene družbe, predstavlja skupno proizvodnjo Skupnosti v smislu člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe.
As explained in recital 9 above, three Community producers made themselves known, provided the information requested in the notice of initiation in due time and were ready to reply to the questionnaire.
Kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (9) zgoraj, so se javili trije proizvajalci Skupnosti, pravočasno predložili informacije, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku, in so bili pripravljeni odgovoriti na vprašalnik.
Questionnaires have therefore been sent to these three Community producers who supported the complaint and fully co-operated in the investigations.
Tem trem proizvajalcem Skupnosti, ki so podprli pritožbo in v celoti sodelovali v preiskavi, so bili zato poslani vprašalniki.
These producers account for more than 25 % of Community production of the product concerned and are therefore deemed to constitute the Community industry within the meaning of Articles 4(1) and 5(4) of the basic Regulation.
Ti proizvajalci predstavljajo več kot 25 % proizvodnje Skupnosti zadevnega izdelka in zato se šteje, da predstavljajo industrijo Skupnosti v smislu členov 4(1) in 5(4) osnovne uredbe.
Community consumption was established on the basis of the volume of imports of the product concerned from the countries concerned based on reported data and complemented by Eurostat data and from all other third countries known to produce and export the product concerned to the Community based on Eurostat, plus the volume of sales in the Community market of both the Community industry and other Community producers.
Potrošnja Skupnosti je bila določena na podlagi obsega uvoza zadevnega izdelka iz zadevnih držav, ki temelji na predloženih podatkih, dopolnjenih s podatki Eurostata, ter vseh drugih tretjih držav, za katere je na podlagi Eurostata znano, da proizvajajo in izvažajo zadevni izdelek v Skupnost, ter obsega prodajo na trgu Skupnosti tako industrije Skupnosti kot tudi drugih proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
For these latter, data reported in mini questionnaires that were sent as explained in recital 143 and regarding those Community producers which did not cooperate at all, data contained in the complaint was used.
Za slednje so se uporabili podatki iz krajših vprašalnikov, ki so bili poslani, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (143), za navedene proizvajalce Skupnosti, ki pa sploh niso sodelovali, pa podatki iz pritožbe.
On this basis, the Community consumption slightly increased over the period considered, i.e. by 3 % between 2002 and the IP.
Poraba Skupnosti se je na tej podlagi v zadevnem obdobju rahlo povečala, tj. za 3 % med letom 2002 in OP.
It first decreased by 5 % between 2002 and 2003 and then rose by more than 8 % to reach 834093 tonnes during the IP.
Najprej se je med letoma 2002 in 2003 zmanjšala za 5 % in nato zrasla za več kot 8 % in dosegla 834093 ton v OP.
Consumption in the EU (volume)
Poraba v EU (obseg)
Consumption (tonnes)
Potrošnja (v tonah)
It was first examined whether imports from Taiwan and Malaysia should be assessed cumulatively, in accordance with Article 3(4) of the basic Regulation.
Najprej je bilo preverjeno, ali naj se uvoz iz Tajvana in Malezije ocenjuje kumulativno, v skladu s členom 3(4) osnovne uredbe.
the dumping margins established in relation to the imports from each of the countries concerned were above the de minimis threshold as defined in Article 9(3) of the basic Regulation,
so ugotovljene stopnje dampinga glede na uvoz iz vsake od zadevnih držav nad pragom de minimis, kakor je opredeljen v členu 9(3) osnovne uredbe,
the volumes of imports from each of these countries were not negligible in the sense of Article 5(7) of the basic Regulation, as market shares for these countries ranged from 2 % to 13 % during the investigation period and,
obseg uvoza iz vsake od teh držav ni bil zanemarljiv v smislu člena 5(7) osnovne uredbe, ker so se tržni deleži teh držav v času obdobja preiskave gibali med 2 % in 13 %, ter
the cumulative assessment was found to be appropriate in view of the conditions of competition both between imports originating in these countries, and between these imports and the like Community product.
je kumulativna ocena glede na konkurenčne pogoje ustrezna tako med uvozom s poreklom iz teh držav kot med tem uvozom in podobnim izdelkom Skupnosti.
To this end, the market behaviour of the exporters was analysed in terms of trends of export prices and volumes.
V ta namen je bilo analizirano obnašanje izvoznikov na trgu v smislu izvoznih cen in obsegov.