natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The latter, on the other hand, will always try to maximise its price and therefore charge the highest price its customers are willing to pay.
Dobavitelj plina bo vedno poskušal zvišati ceno in zaračunati najvišji znesek, ki so ga stranke pripravljene plačati.
Given that this price is always well above its costs of production, allowing the gas supplier to make huge profits, its price setting is not primarily influenced by the amount of the export tax but by what price its customers are willing to pay.
Glede na to, da ta cena vedno precej presega stroške proizvodnje, kar dobavitelju plina prinaša velike dobičke, na oblikovanje cene v prvi vrsti ne vpliva višina izvozne dajatve, temveč znesek, ki so ga stranke pripravljene plačati.
It was therefore concluded that the price including the export tax, and not the price before that tax, is the undistorted market driven price.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da je neizkrivljena cena, oblikovana na trgu, cena z izvozno dajatvijo, ne pa cena pred dajatvijo.
Consequently, the arguments of the applicant in this regard were rejected.
Posledično so bili argumenti vložnika v zvezi s tem zavrnjeni.
The applicant further claimed that the price at Waidhaus should have been adjusted for quality, availability, marketability, transportation and other conditions of sale which would be different in the export and the domestic market of natural gas.
Vložnik je tudi izjavil, da bi bilo treba ceno pri Waidhausu prilagoditi glede na kakovost, razpoložljivost, tržnost, prevoz in druge pogoje prodaje, ki se razlikujejo na izvoznem in domačem trgu za zemeljski plin.
It should first be noted that the price of Waidhaus was indeed adjusted by different transportation cost for the export and the domestic market and that the applicant’s claim in this regard was not warranted and had to be rejected.
Najprej je treba navesti, da je bila cena pri Waidhausu dejansko prilagojena glede na različne prevozne stroške za izvozni in domači trg in da trditev vložnika v zvezi s tem ni bila upravičena in zato zavrnjena.
As far as the other elements are concerned the applicant did not provide any further information or any supporting evidence.
Glede drugih elementov vložnik ni predložil dodatnih informacij ali potrebnih dokazov.
In particular, the applicant did not show, nor was there any other information available, that there were differences in quality, availability, marketability and other conditions of sales which would have justified further adjustments, nor did the applicant attempt to quantify these alleged differences.
Zlasti pa vložnik ni dokazal niti ni bilo na voljo drugih informacij o tem, da so bile v kakovosti, razpoložljivosti, tržnosti in drugih pogojih prodaje razlike, ki bi utemeljevale nadaljnje prilagoditve, poleg tega pa vložnik ni poskušal količinsko opredeliti teh domnevnih razlik.
In this context, the applicant further argued that no adjustments for natural comparative advantages have been made to the price at Waidhaus.
V tem kontekstu je vložnik nadalje zatrjeval, da cene pri Waidhausu niso bile prilagojene za naravne primerjalne prednosti.
In this regard, it was claimed that since gas is largely available in Russia but not in the Community, prices in Russia would be naturally lower than the price of the exported gas.
V zvezi s tem je bilo navedeno, da bi bile cene plina v Rusiji nižje od cen izvoženega plina, saj ima Rusija veliko plina, Skupnost pa ne.
Furthermore, it was alleged that the export capacity would be limited by the limits of the existing gas transportation system which would increase export prices of Russia.
Nadalje je bilo navedeno, da bi bila izvozna zmogljivost omejena z obstoječim sistemom za prenos plina, kar bi povečalo ruske izvozne cene.
The applicant also argued that the ‘abnormal high profits’ of the Russian gas supplier on the export market should be deducted from the Waidhaus price used.
Vložnik je tudi izjavil, da je treba „neobičajno visoke dobičke“ ruskega dobavitelja plina na izvoznem trgu odšteti od uporabljene cene pri Waidhausu.
As mentioned in recital (29) above, the primary criterion for the choice of Waidhaus prices as basis on which to establish the gas prices is that they reasonably reflect a price normally payable in undistorted markets.
Kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi 29 zgoraj, je prvo merilo za izbiro cen pri Waidhausu kot osnove, na kateri se določijo cene plina, da ustrezno odražajo ceno, ki se običajno plačuje na neizkrivljenih trgih.
The market conditions prevailing in the domestic market are irrelevant in this context.
Razmere, ki prevladujejo na domačem trgu, v tem kontekstu niso pomembne.
Therefore these arguments had to be rejected.
Zato je bilo treba navedene argumente zavrniti.
The applicant also objected that the mark-up of the local distributors has been added to the adjusted gas price, claiming that profits of distributors would already be included in the price at Waidhaus.
Vložnik je ugovarjal tudi, da so bili pribitki lokalnih distributerjev dodani prilagojeni ceni plina, in trdil, da so dobički distributerjev že zajeti v ceni pri Waidhausu.
In this regard, the applicant claimed that the local distributors in Russia were fully owned subsidiaries of the gas supplier and therefore addition of the profit of these distributors could constitute double counting.
V zvezi s tem je vložnik trdil, da so lokalni distributerji v Rusiji hčerinske družbe v popolni lasti dobavitelja plina in bi lahko dodatek dobička teh distributerjev povzročil dvojno štetje.
It is first noted that the mark-up of local distributors do not only include the profit margin of these companies but also their costs between purchase and re-sale of the natural gas.
Najprej je treba opozoriti, da pribitki lokalnih distributerjev ne vključujejo samo stopnje dobička teh družb, ampak tudi stroške, ki izhajajo iz razlike med nakupom in ponovno prodajo zemeljskega plina.
Secondly, this argument could not be sufficiently verified anymore.
Drugič, tega argumenta ni bilo več mogoče zadostno preveriti.
This is due to the fact that the gas supplier in Russia and its affiliations were not subject to the present investigation and that therefore there was insufficient information of the organisation and its cost structure available.
Razlog je v dejstvu, da dobavitelj plina v Rusiji in njegove hčerinske družbe niso bili zajeti s sedanjo preiskavo in zato ni bilo na voljo dovolj informacij o njegovi organizaciji in strukturi stroškov.
It is also noted that the situation in Russia in this regard due to, inter alia, the close links between the gas supplier and the Russian government is not sufficiently transparent to allow sufficient access to the necessary evidence.
Treba je tudi opomniti, da razmere v Rusiji v tem pogledu niso dovolj pregledne, med drugim zaradi tesnih povezav med dobaviteljem plina in rusko vlado, da bi omogočale zadovoljiv dostop do potrebnih dokazov.
Moreover, the applicant, who has the burden of proof, was not able to submit any further information or evidence which showed whether and in what extent distribution costs were indeed included in the Waidhaus price.
Poleg tega vložnik, ki nosi dokazno breme, ni uspel predložiti nobenih dodatnih informacij ali dokazov, ki bi pokazale(-i), ali in v kakšnem obsegu so bili stroški distribucije dejansko vključeni v ceno pri Waidhausu.
However, since domestic customers were purchasing the gas from local suppliers, it had to be assumed that they would have to pay local distribution costs which are not as such included in the unadjusted Waidhaus price.
Toda ker so domače stranke kupovale plin pri lokalnih dobaviteljih, se lahko domneva, da bi morale plačati stroške lokalne distribucije, ki kot takšni niso vključeni v neprilagojeno ceno pri Waidhausu.
Therefore, at this stage of the proceeding it had to be considered that this adjustment was warranted and consequently the argument was rejected.
Zato je bilo v tej fazi postopka treba upoštevati, da je bila ta prilagoditev upravičena in posledično je bil argument zavrnjen.
However, the Community Institutions also considered that the impact on the calculation of the dumping margin of this specific adjustment may be significant.
Vendar so institucije Skupnosti tudi menile, da bi lahko ta posebna prilagoditev očitno vplivala na izračun stopnje dampinga.
Therefore, given the particular situation described above in recital (41), it was considered that if the applicant supplies sufficient verifiable evidence, the Commission may consider the re-opening of the investigation in this regard.
Glede na posebno situacijo, opisano v uvodni izjavi 41, se je zato štelo, da Komisija v zvezi s tem lahko razmisli o ponovnem začetku pregleda, če vložnik predloži zadostne preverljive dokaze.
The applicant also made allegations about non-competitive domestic pricing on gas in Germany.
Vložnik je navedel tudi, da se v Nemčiji cene plina oblikujejo nekonkurenčno.
It is noted that ongoing investigations by German antitrust authorities concern prices at which German main gas distributors sell the gas on the domestic market, and therefore it is not linked at al to the price at which Russian exported gas is sold at Waidhaus.
Treba je opozoriti, da preiskave, ki jih sedaj izvajajo nemški protimonopolni organi, zadevajo cene, po katerih glavni nemški distributerji plina plin prodajajo na domačem trgu, zato te nikakor niso povezane s ceno, po kateri se ruski plin prodaja pri Waidhausu.
After adjusting the cost of manufacturing as described above, no domestic sales were made in the ordinary course of trade pursuant of Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Po prilagoditvi stroškov proizvodnje, kot je opisano zgoraj, nobena domača prodaja ni bila izvedena po običajnem poteku trgovanja v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
It was therefore considered that domestic prices did not provide an appropriate basis for the establishment of the normal value and another method had to be applied.
Zato je veljalo, da domače cene niso bile primerna osnova za določitev normalne vrednosti in uporabiti je bilo treba drugo metodo.
In accordance with Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation, normal value was constructed by adding to the exporter’s manufacturing costs of the product concerned, adjusted where necessary as mentioned in recital (19) above, a reasonable amount for SG&A and a reasonable amount for profit.
V skladu s členom 2(3) in (6) osnovne uredbe je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana tako, da so se izvoznikovim proizvodnim stroškom za zadevni izdelek, ki so bili po potrebi prilagojeni, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 19, dodali razumni zneski za PSA-stroške in dobiček.
SG&A costs and profit could not be established on the basis of the chapeau of Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation because the applicant did not have representative domestic sales of the product concerned in the ordinary course of trade.
PSA-stroški in dobiček niso mogli biti določeni v skladu s členom 2(6) osnovne uredbe, ker vložnik ni imel reprezentativne domače prodaje zadevnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovine.
Article 2(6)(a) of the basic Regulation could not be applied, since there is only one producer subject to the investigation.
Člena 2(6)(a) osnovne uredbe ni bilo mogoče uporabiti, ker je preiskava zajemala samo enega vložnika.
Article 2(6)(b) was not applicable either, since the manufacturing cost of the applicant for products belonging to the same general category of goods would also need to be adjusted in respect of gas costs, for the reasons indicated in recital (18) above.
Ravno tako ni bilo mogoče uporabiti člena 2(6)(b), saj bi morali biti zaradi razlogov iz uvodne izjave 18 v zvezi s stroški plina prilagojeni tudi proizvodni stroški vložnika za izdelke, ki spadajo v enako splošno kategorijo blaga.
Therefore, SG&A costs and profit were established pursuant to Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Zato so bili PSA-stroški in dobiček določeni na podlagi člena 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation, the SG&A costs were based on a reasonable method.
V skladu s členom 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe so bili PSA-stroški utemeljeni na ustrezni metodi.
The North American market showed a significant volume of domestic sales and a considerable level of competition from both domestic and foreign companies.
Severnoameriški trg je pokazal znaten obseg domače prodaje in visoko raven konkurence domačih in tujih družb.
In this respect, consideration was given to publicly available information relating to major companies operating in the fertilizers business sector.
V zvezi s tem so bili proučeni javno dostopni podatki v zvezi z družbami, ki delujejo v sektorju poslovanja z gnojili.
It was found that the corresponding data from North American (USA and Canadian) producers would be the most appropriate for the purpose of the investigation, given the large availability of reliable and complete public financial information from listed companies in this region of the world.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da bi bili ustrezni podatki severnoameriških (ZDA in Kanada) proizvajalcev najprimernejši za namen preiskave, glede na veliko dostopnost zanesljivih in popolnih javnih finančnih informacij družb iz tega dela sveta, ki kotirajo na borzi.
Therefore, SG&A costs and profit were established on the basis of the weighted average SG&A costs and profit from three North American producers, which were found to be amongst the largest companies in the nitrogen fertilizers' sector, with regard to their domestic sales of the same general category of products (nitrogen fertilizers).
Zato so bili PSA-stroški in dobiček določeni na podlagi tehtanega povprečja PSA-stroškov in dobička treh severnoameriških proizvajalcev, ki spadajo med največje družbe v sektorju dušikovih gnojil, glede na njihovo domačo prodajo enake kategorije izdelkov (dušikova gnojila).
These three producers were considered to be representative of the nitrogen fertilizers' business and their SG&A costs and profit thereby representative of those normally incurred by companies operating successfully in that business segment.
Ti trije proizvajalci so se šteli za reprezentativne na področju poslovanja z dušikovimi gnojili, njihovi PSA-stroški in dobiček pa za reprezentativne običajne stroške in dobiček družb, ki uspešno delujejo na tem poslovnem področju.
It should be noted that there were no indications that the amount for profit so established would exceed the profit realized by other Russian producers on sales of products of the same general category on their domestic market.
Treba je opozoriti, da ni bilo razvidno, da bi višina tako določenega dobička presegala dobiček, ki so ga drugi ruski proizvajalci ustvarili pri prodaji izdelkov enake kategorije na domačem trgu.
The Community industry objected to the above approach with regard to the determination of the SG&A and claimed the applicant’s own SG&A should have been used.
Industrija Skupnosti je v zvezi z določitvijo PSA-stroškov zgornjemu pristopu nasprotovala in navedla, da bi bilo treba uporabiti vložnikove PSA-stroške.
However, Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation sets out that the amounts for SG&A shall only be based on actual data pertaining to the production and sales of the exporting producer concerned, when these sales were made in the ordinary course of trade.
Vendar pa člen 2(6) osnovne uredbe določa, da zneski za PSA-stroške temeljijo le na dejanskih podatkih, ki se nanašajo na proizvodnjo in prodajo zadevnega proizvajalca izvoznika, ko ta prodaja poteka po običajnem poteku trgovine.
As outlined in recitals (45) and (46), this was not the case and this argument therefore had to be rejected.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 45 in 46, temu ni bilo tako in zato je bilo treba ta argument zavrniti.
In accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, the export price was established on the basis of the price actually paid or payable for the product concerned when sold for export to the Community.
V skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe je bila izvozna cena določena na osnovi cene, ki je bila dejansko plačana ali se plačuje za zadevni izdelek, ko se ta izvozi v Skupnost.
The normal value and the export price were compared on an ex-works basis.
Normalna vrednost in izvozna cena sta bili primerjani na podlagi franko tovarna.
Appropriate adjustments concerning transport, credit, packing and bank charges were granted when reasonable, accurate and supported by verified evidence.
Primerne prilagoditve v zvezi s prevozom, kreditom, pakiranjem in bančnimi stroški so bile izvedene, ko so bile razumne, natančne in podprte s preverjenimi dokazi.
The dumping margin was established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with a weighted average export price, in accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation.
Stopnja dampinga je bila v skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno.
The investigation showed that dumping took place during the RIP.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je do dampinga prišlo med obdobjem preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
The dumping margin expressed as a percentage of the CIF Community frontier price, duty unpaid, is 42,06 %.
Stopnja dampinga, izražena kot odstotek cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, je 42,06 %.
Lasting nature of the circumstances prevailing during the IP
Trajna narava okoliščin, ki so prevladovale med OP
In accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, an analysis was made as to whether the change in circumstances with regard to dumping could reasonably be said to be of a lasting nature.
V skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe je bila izvedena analiza, da se ugotovi, ali se sprememba okoliščin glede dampinga lahko utemeljeno šteje za trajno.
In this regard, it should be noted that normal value in the original investigation was established on the basis of profitable sales prices in the USA domestic market, since Russia was not a market economy country at that time.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je bila normalna vrednost v prvotni preiskavi določena na podlagi dobičkonosnih prodajnih cen na domačem trgu ZDA, ker Rusija v tem času še ni bila država s tržnim gospodarstvom.
In the context of the current review investigation, Russia is considered a market economy country, and the normal value has therefore been established on the basis of the applicant’s own cost of production, adjusted where necessary.
V okviru sedanje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom se Rusija šteje za državo s tržnim gospodarstvom, zato je normalna tržna vrednost določena na podlagi vložnikovih stroškov proizvodnje, ki so bili po potrebi prilagojeni.
No indications could be found that the normal value established during the present review could not be considered to be of a lasting nature.
Iz nobene ugotovitve ni razvidno, da normalna vrednost, določena med sedanjim pregledom, ne bi bila trajne narave.
No evidence was found that export sales would not continue to be made at the current price level.
Ni bilo dokazov o tem, da se izvoz ne bi nadaljeval po sedanji ravni cen.
On this basis, it is concluded that the changed circumstances with respect to the original investigation regarding dumping (now based on the comparison of the own normal value and export prices of the applicant) could reasonably be considered to be of a lasting nature.
Na podlagi tega se sklene, da se spremenjene okoliščine glede na prvotno preiskavo v zvezi z dampingom (zdaj na podlagi primerjave lastne normalne vrednosti in izvoznih cen vložnika) upravičeno lahko štejejo za trajne.
Since, in the original investigation the duty was imposed in the form of a specific amount per tonne, it should have the same form in the current investigation.
Ker je bila dajatev v prvotni preiskavi uvedena v obliki posebnega zneska na tono, bi bilo treba to obliko ohraniti tudi v sedanji preiskavi.
The duty calculated on the basis of the current margin of dumping would be EUR 48,09/t.
Dajatev, izračunana na podlagi sedanje stopnje dampinga, bi znašala 48,09 EUR na tono.
It is recalled that, as outlined in recital (94) of Council Regulation (EC) No 658/2002, when imposing definitive measures in 2002, the injury margin was used when determining the amount of the definitive duty to be imposed in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
Treba je opomniti, da se je, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 94 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 658/2002, pri uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov leta 2002 stopnja škode uporabila pri določanju višine dokončne dajatve, ki se uvede v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve.
As defined by Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 658/2002, the duty currently in force is depending on the specific product type and varies between EUR 41,42/t and EUR 47,07/t.
Kot je opredeljeno s členom 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 658/2002, je znesek veljavne dajatve odvisen od posebnega tipa izdelka in znaša med 41,42 EUR na tono in 47,07 EUR na tono.
Since the duty established on the basis of the current margin of dumping is higher than the current duty, the review should be terminated without amending the level of the duty applicable to the applicant, which should be maintained at the level of the definitive anti-dumping duty rate established in the original investigation.
Ker je dajatev, določena na podlagi veljavne stopnje dampinga, višja od veljavne dajatve, je treba pregled zaključiti brez sprememb stopnje dajatve, ki velja za vložnika in ki se ohrani na ravni dokončne protidampinške dajatve, določene v prvotni preiskavi.
The applicant expressed an interest in offering an undertaking but failed to submit a sufficiently substantiated undertaking offers within the deadlines set in Article 8(2) of the basic Regulation.
Vložnik je izrazil interes, da ponudi zavezo, vendar ni predložil dovolj utemeljenih ponudb za zavezo v rokih, določenih v členu 8(2) osnovne uredbe.
Consequently no undertaking offer could be accepted by the Commission.
Zato Komisija ni mogla sprejeti nobene ponudbe za zavezo.
However, it is considered that the complexity of several issues, namely
Vendar zapletenost nekaterih vprašanj, in sicer
the volatility of the price of the product concerned which would require some form of indexation of minimum prices, while at the same time the volatility is not sufficiently explained by the key cost driver; and
nestanovitnost cene zadevnega izdelka, ki bi zahtevala določeno indeksacijo minimalnih cen, pri čemer pa ključno gonilo stroškov ne pojasnjuje zadostno nestanovitnosti, in
the particular market situation for the product concerned (inter alia, that there are limited imports from the exporter subject to this review)
posebne razmere na trgu za zadevni izdelek (med drugim, da je uvoz izvoznika, ki je predmet tega pregleda, omejen),
point to the need to further consider whether an undertaking combining an indexed minimum price and a quantitative ceiling would be workable.
nakazuje potrebo po nadaljnjem obravnavanju, ali bi bila zaveza v kombinaciji indeksirane minimalne cene in kvantitativne zgornje meje učinkovita.
As mentioned above, due to this complexity the applicant could not formulate an acceptable undertaking offer within the statutory deadline.
Kot je omenjeno zgoraj, zaradi te zapletenosti vložnik ni mogel oblikovati sprejemljive ponudbe za zavezo v določenem roku.
In view of the above, the Council considers that the applicant should exceptionally be allowed to complete its undertaking offer beyond the above-mentioned deadline but within 10 calendar days from entry into force of this regulation.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj napisanega Svet meni, da je treba vložniku izjemoma dovoliti dopolnitev ponudbe za zavezo po zgoraj omenjenem roku, vendar v roku 10 koledarskih dni od začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to terminate the present review and to maintain the existing anti-dumping duty on imports of the product concerned produced by the applicant.
Zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravalo zaključiti sedanji pregled in ohraniti obstoječe protidampinške dajatve na uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga proizvaja vložnik.