natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
By the same token, the decision under examination did not concern Article 5 of Law No 290/99 nor Article 15(16) of Law No 67/88 and Law No 252/91 which constituted the legal basis for granting the aid provided for in Article 5 of Law No 290/99, which is assessed within the framework of State aid No C/7B/2000.
Prav tako zadevna odločitev ne zadeva člena 5 Zakona št. 290/99 niti člena 15(16) Zakona št. 67/88 in Zakona št. 252/91, ki so pravna podlaga za dodelitev pomoči iz člena 5 Zakona št. 290/99, ocenjene v okviru državne pomoči št. C/7B/2000.
Additional information was sent by the Italian authorities in their letter dated 27 February 2003, registered on 28 February 2003, providing information requested by the Commission's letter of 8 May 2002.
Italijanski organi so dodatne informacije poslali v dopisu z dne 27. februarja 2003, vpisanim v evidenco 28. februarja 2003, v katerem so navedli informacije, ki jih je v dopisu z dne 8. maja 2002 zahtevala Komisija.
Following the outcome of the meeting held between Commission officials and the Italian authorities on 24 March 2004 and of several informal discussions on the topic, the Italian authorities asked, by letter dated 20 May 2004 and registered on 14 June 2004, for additional time in order to provide the information still needed for the assessment of the file.
Po srečanju med uradniki Komisije in italijanskimi organi 24. marca 2004 ter več neuradnih razpravah na to temo so italijanski organi v dopisu z dne 20. maja 2004, vpisanim v evidenco 14. junija 2004, zaprosili za dodaten čas za zagotovitev informacij, ki so manjkale za ustrezno oceno dokumenta.
By letter of 29 October 2004, registered on 3 November 2004, the Italian authorities provided additional information.
V dopisu z dne 29. oktobra 2004, vpisanim v evidenco 3. novembra 2004, so italijanski organi navedli dodatne informacije.
In the same letter they indicated that they would ask to keep confidential the financial data, the interventions undertaken and the account statements of the companies concerned.
Z istim dopisom so izrazili željo po zaupnosti finančnih podatkov, izvedenih ukrepov in bančnih izpiskov zadevnih družb.
By letter dated 24 November 2004, registered on 3 December 2004, the Italian authorities provided additional information.
V dopisu z dne 24. novembra 2004, vpisanim v evidenco 3. decembra 2004, so italijanski organi navedli dodatne informacije.
They also specified that no request for confidentiality had been made at that stage.
V tem dopisu so tudi navedli, da na tej stopnji ni bilo zahteve po zaupnosti.
Additional information was transmitted by letter dated 4 April 2005, registered on 7 April 2005.
Dodatne informacije so bile poslane v dopisu z dne 4. aprila 2005, vpisanim v evidenco 7. aprila 2005.
Law No 290/99, which is divided into eight articles, provides for an extension of the time limits for various operations in the agricultural sector.
Zakon št. 290/99, ki vsebuje osem členov, določa podaljšanje rokov za različne dejavnosti v kmetijskem sektorju.
In its Decision of 24 February 2000, the Commission did not raise objections with respect to Articles 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 8 of the abovementioned Law in that they did not constitute aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty.
V sklepu z dne 24. februarja 2000 Komisija ni nasprotovala členom 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 in 8 navedenega zakona, saj ne pomenijo pomoči v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
However, the decision to initiate the procedure provided for by Article 88(2) concerned Articles 4 and 5 of that Law as well as Article 15(16) of Laws No 67/88 and No 252/91, which constituted the legal basis for granting the subsidies referred to in Article 5 of Law No 290/99.
Kljub temu odločitev o sprožitvi postopka iz člena 88(2) zadeva člena 4 in 5 tega zakona ter člen 15(16) Zakona št. 67/88 in Zakon št. 252/91, ki so pravna podlaga za odobritev subvencij iz člena 5 Zakona št. 290/99.
A final negative decision on Article 4 of Law No 290/99 was adopted by the Commission on 5 April 2002.
Komisija je 5. aprila 2002 sprejela dokončno negativno odločitev o členu 4 Zakona 290/99.
The present Decision concerns Article 15(16) of Law No 67/88, Law No 252/91, Article 4 (only for the farming, operating and improvement loans due on 31 March 1998) and Article 5 of Law No 290/99.
Ta odločitev zadeva člen 15(16) Zakona št. 67/88, Zakon št. 252/91, člen 4 (le za posojila za kmetijstvo, poslovanje in izboljšave, ki so zapadla 31. marca 1998) in člen 5 Zakona št. 290/99.
According to the information provided, in the late 1980s, the livestock sector in Italy suffered from the excessive fragmentation of production, which resulted in out-of-date structures, unsuitable to quality production.
Glede na navedene informacije je bila proizvodnja v živinorejskem sektorju v Italiji konec osemdesetih let 20. stoletja preveč razdrobljena, zaradi česar so postali objekti zastareli in neprimerni za kakovostno proizvodnjo.
In order to modernise the whole system, Law No 87/90, subsequently amended by Law No 252/91, provided for aid for integrated projects, i.e. projects aggregating several undertakings in a cluster-like structure.
Da bi se posodobil celotni sistem, se je z Zakonom št. 87/90, ki je bil pozneje spremenjen z Zakonom št. 252/91, določila pomoč za celostne projekte, tj. projekte, ki združujejo več podjetij v povezovalno strukturo.
The projects were included in a programme approved by the Italian inter-ministerial economic committee (CIPE), on the basis that only projects undertaken by a group of interconnected companies capable of ensuring their completion should be financed.
Projekti so bili vključeni v program, ki ga je odobril italijanski medresorski odbor za gospodarsko načrtovanje, pri čemer so se lahko financirali le tisti projekti, pri katerih je sodelovala skupina medsebojno povezanih družb, ki je bila te projekte sposobna dokončati.
This also meant that each company in the project was responsible for the completion of the whole project by guaranteeing (with a special clause) the joint commitment of all the aggregated companies.
To je prav tako pomenilo, da je bila vsaka družba, vključena v projekt, odgovorna za dokončanje celotnega projekta, pri čemer je zagotovila (s posebno določbo) skupno zavezanost združenih družb.
Furthermore, all the companies were requested to participate financially to the projects in a substantial way, with new capitalisation and, for cooperatives, also in the form of a 10-year loan.
Poleg tega so bile vse družbe naprošene, da z novo kapitalizacijo znatno finančno prispevajo k projektom, zadruge pa tudi v obliki 10-letnega posojila.
The guarantees required by the State (guarantee on the whole project and capitalisation of the companies) to be eligible for aid represented a significant financial constraint for the companies involved.
Garancije, ki jih je zahtevala država (garancija za celoten projekt in kapitalizacijo družb), da bi se upravičila pomoč, so bile velika finančna ovira za udeležene družbe.
In view of the fact that the resources allocated to the completion of the integrated projects could not cover the overall financial needs of the sector, additional resources under Law No 67/88 were also used for financing these integrated projects.
Glede na dejstvo, da viri sredstev, dodeljeni za dokončanje celostnih projektov, niso mogli pokriti vseh finančnih potreb sektorja, so bili v skladu z Zakonom št. 67/88 za financiranje teh projektov uporabljeni tudi dodatni viri.
The interventions were carried out within the framework of an overall programme of rationalisation and restructuring of the beef sector which, in Italy, unlike most other countries in Europe, had only started in the early 1990s.
Ukrepi so se izvedli v okviru celotnega programa za racionalizacijo in prestrukturiranje sektorja govejega mesa, ki se je v Italiji v nasprotju z večino držav v Evropi začel izvajati na začetku devetdesetih letih 20. stoletja.
Other countries in the European Union, such as France, had launched programmes for the restructuring and rationalisation of their slaughtering plants as early as the 1970s.
Druge države v Evropski uniji, na primer Francija, so s programi za prestrukturiranje in racionalizacijo obratov za zakol začele že v sedemdesetih letih 20. stoletja.
The very high number of slaughtering plants in Italy and their inappropriate distribution over the national territory called for a drastic reorganisation of the sector which, according to the Italian authorities, could only be carried out with strong public support on the basis of a programme designed to modernise the entire sector.
Zelo veliko število obratov za zakol v Italiji in njihova neprimerna porazdelitev po državnem ozemlju sta zahtevala temeljito reorganizacijo sektorja, ki bi se lahko po mnenju italijanskih organov oblasti izvedla le z odločno javno podporo na podlagi programa za posodobitev celotnega sektorja.
In order to survive, Italian undertakings needed to speed up technological innovation and organisational restructuring along two lines:
Da bi italijanska podjetja preživela, so morala spodbuditi tehnološke inovacije in organizacijsko prestrukturiranje v dveh sklopih:
rationalisation of the breeding systems with the adoption of technological improvement methods designed to achieve standardised productions at competitive costs;
racionalizacija sistemov vzreje s sprejetjem metod za tehnološke izboljšave, namenjene doseganju standardizirane proizvodnje po konkurenčnih cenah;
diversification of productions of high quality level and rationalisation of products of constant and uniform quality.
diverzifikacija proizvodnje na visoki kakovostni ravni ter racionalizacija proizvodov stalne in enotne kakovosti.
The task of implementing the law was delegated to a group of experts, who were required to draw up an urgent action programme, define the strategic approach and decide whether the projects submitted could be eligible for aid.
Naloga izvajanja zakona je bila dodeljena skupini strokovnjakov, od katerih se je zahtevalo, da pripravijo nujni akcijski program, opredelijo strateški pristop in odločijo, ali so predloženi projekti lahko upravičeni do pomoči.
Given the serious crisis of the bovine sector, the actions of the programme were mainly targeted to this sector and, to a lesser extent, to the pigmeat and sheepmeat sectors.
Ob upoštevanju resne krize v sektorju goveda so bili ukrepi programa usmerjeni predvsem v ta sektor, v manjšem obsegu pa tudi v sektorja prašičjega in ovčjega mesa.
Law No 67/88 of 11 March 1988
Zakon št. 67/88 z dne 11. marca 1988
Law No 67/88 establishing the credit subsidies referred to in Article 5 of Law No 290/99 lays down provisions for the annual and multiannual state budget and constitutes the Italian 1988 Finance Law.
Zakon št. 68/88 o določitvi kreditnih subvencij iz člena 5 Zakona št. 290/99 predpisuje določbe o letnem in večletnem državnem proračunu ter je del italijanskega Zakona o financah iz leta 1988.
Article 15(16) of this Law allows that cooperatives and their consortia to raise loans up to a maximum of ITL 700 billion for the construction, restructuring or extension of slaughtering plants.
Člen 15(16) tega zakona omogoča, da zadruge in njihovi konzorciji povečajo posojila do največ 700 milijard ITL za gradnjo, prestrukturiranje ali razširitev obratov za zakol.
According to the Law, those taking out the loans may use them, up to a limit of ITL 100 billion for 1988 and ITL 50 billion for 1989, to consolidate existing debt on the aforementioned structures and premises.
Po zakonu lahko tisti, ki so najeli posojila, ta denar porabijo za konsolidacijo obstoječih dolgov za navedene strukture in obrate, in sicer največ 100 milijard ITL v letu 1988 in 50 milijard ITL v letu 1989.
A maximum interest subsidy of 10 % is granted on these loans.
Največja subvencija obrestne mere za ta posojila znaša 10 %.
Article 15(16) also applies to the funding of projects to consolidate and develop agricultural cooperatives and their consortia engaged in milk or meat production.
Člen 15(16) se uporablja tudi za financiranje projektov, da se konsolidirajo ter razvijejo zadruge in njihovi konzorciji, ki se ukvarjajo s proizvodnjo mleka ali mesa.
The Law was never notified to the Commission as required by Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
O Zakonu Komisija nikoli ni bila uradno obveščena, kot zahteva člen 88(3) Pogodbe ES.
Article 5 of Law No 290/99
Člen 5 Zakona št. 290/99
Article 5 of the notified Law establishes the circumstances when credit subsidies on loans contracted under Article 15(16) of Law No 67/88 can continue to apply even where some of the conditions initially laid down have not been met.
Člen 5 priglašenega zakona določa okoliščine, v katerih se lahko kreditne subvencije na posojila, najeta v skladu s členom 15(16) Zakona št. 67/88, uporabljajo še naprej, čeprav nekateri začetni pogoji niso izpolnjeni.
In particular, Article 5(2) provides that credit subsidies on loans contracted under the abovementioned Article 15(16) in respect of joint development or debt-consolidation measures continue to apply even where the integrated project approved under Article 1 of Law No 87/90, as replaced by Article 1 of Law No 252/91, is only completed in part, provided that the integrated project of the person who took out the loan is completed.
Člen 5(2) določa zlasti, da se kreditne subvencije na posojila, najeta v skladu z navedenim členom 15(16) glede skupnega razvoja ali ukrepov za konsolidacijo dolga uporabljajo še naprej, čeprav se celostni projekt, ki je odobren v skladu s členom 1 Zakona št. 87/90, kakor je bil nadomeščen s členom 1 Zakona št. 252/91, izvede le delno, če je celostni projekt osebe, ki je najela posojilo, v celoti izveden.
Article 5(3) provides that credit subsidies on loans contracted for the sole purpose of debt consolidation remain valid even where the integrated project fails to be carried out or is carried out only in part, provided that the person who took out the loan submits a personal investment project, to be undertaken using some of the loan.
Člen 5(3) določa, da kreditne subvencije na posojila, najeta le za konsolidacijo dolga, ostanejo veljavne, čeprav se celostni projekt ne izvede ali se izvede le delno, če predloži oseba, ki je najela posojilo, osebni naložbeni projekt, ki se bo izvedel z uporabo dela posojila.
Moreover, paragraph 4 of the same Article provides that undertakings that have joined together for an integrated livestock project of national importance and eligible for funding under Article 1 of Law No 87/90, as replaced by Article 1 of Law No 252/91, should maintain their right to and eligibility for credit subsidies even where the original integrated project is not completed, provided that they complete their own part of the project.
Poleg tega odstavek 4 istega člena določa, da morajo podjetja, ki so se združila za celostni projekt na področju živinoreje, pomemben za državo, in ki so upravičena do financiranja v skladu s členom 1 Zakona št. 87/90, kakor je bil nadomeščen s členom 1 Zakona št. 252/91, ohraniti pravico in upravičenost do kreditnih subvencij, čeprav prvotni celostni projekt ni dokončan, če v celoti izvedejo svoj del projekta.
Article 4 of Law No 290/99
Člen 4 Zakona št. 290/99
Article 4 provides for measures to facilitate agricultural credit operations.
Člen 4 določa ukrepe za spodbujanje kreditnih poslov na področju kmetijstva.
In particular, it extended by twelve months the repayment period for operating, improvement and agricultural loans which expired on 31 March 1998.
Zlasti se je obdobje za odplačila posojil za poslovanje, izboljšave in kmetijstvo, ki so zapadla 31. marca 1998, v skladu s tem členom podaljšalo za dvanajst mesecev.
The beneficiaries were agricultural holdings primarily engaged in olive growing in Apulia, Calabria and Sicily, run by owner-occupiers or full-time farmers or olive-growing cooperatives who had been affected by the serious crisis on the market for olives and olive oil.
Upravičenci so bila kmetijska gospodarstva, ki so se ukvarjala predvsem z gojenjem oljk v Apuliji, Kalabriji in na Siciliji in ki so jih vodili stanovalci lastniki ali polnozaposleni kmetje ali zadruge, ki jih je na trgu oljk in oljčnega olja prizadela resna kriza.
Agricultural holdings and olive-growing cooperatives in other olive-growing regions can also qualify for these measures under the same rules and procedures if similarly affected by the crisis on the market for olives and olive oil.
Za kmetijska gospodarstva in zadruge v drugih regijah, ki se ukvarjajo z gojenjem oljk, lahko prav tako veljajo ti ukrepi v skladu z istimi pravili in postopki, če je kriza na trgu oljk in oljčnega olja prizadela tudi njih.
The Article defines an agricultural holding or an olive-growing cooperative primarily engaged in olive growing as an entity that derives at least 50 % of its gross commercial production from olives.
Ta člen opredeljuje kmetijsko gospodarstvo ali zadrugo, ki se ukvarja predvsem z gojenjem oljk, kot entiteto, pri kateri vsaj 50 % bruto proizvodnje za tržne namene zajema proizvodnjo oljk.
On 3 April 2002, the Commission took a final negative decision with respect to the aid provided for by Article 4 of Law No 290/99.
Komisija je 3. aprila 2002 sprejela dokončno negativno odločitev v zvezi s pomočjo iz člena 4 Zakona št. 290/99.
As clearly indicated in the decision, however, the decision did not concern, nor extended its effects to farming, operating and improvement loans which expired on 31 March 1998 for which an extension was provided for by Article 4 of Law No 290/99.
Vendar, kot je jasno navedeno v odločitvi, ta ne zadeva posojil za kmetovanje, poslovanje in izboljšave, ki so zapadla 31. marca 1998 in za katere je bil v skladu s členom 4 Zakona št. 290/99 predviden odlog, niti nanje ne vpliva.
These loans therefore still need to be assessed.
Ta posojila je treba zato še oceniti.
Law No 252/91 of 8 August 1991
Zakon št. 252/91 z dne 8. avgusta 1991
The other law referred to in Article 5 as a legal basis for the granting of various forms of aid is Law No 252/91 amending Law No 87/90 on urgent animal husbandry measures.
Drugi zakon iz člena 5, ki je pravna podlaga za dodelitev različnih pomoči, je Zakon št. 252/91 o spremembi Zakona št. 87/90 o nujnih ukrepih za živinorejo.
It variously assists exceptional animal husbandry measures in the form of integrated projects of national importance, for which it also authorises the relevant appropriations.
Na različne načine spodbuja izjemne ukrepe za živinorejo v obliki celostnih projektov, pomembnih za državo, za katere tudi odobri ustrezna proračunska sredstva.
The Law also provides for the incorporation of a joint stock company where 51 % of the shares is owned by the Ministry for Agricultural and Forestry Policy which will be entrusted with the following tasks:
Zakon prav tako določa vključitev delniške družbe, pri kateri je lastnik 51 % delnic Ministrstvo za kmetijstvo in gozdarsko politiko, ki bo zadolženo za naslednje naloge:
providing guarantees on loans;
zagotavljanje garancij za posojila;
carrying out funding operations;
izvajanje postopkov financiranja;
granting financing with respect to rescuing and restructuring operations and winding-up of companies;
dodeljevanje finančnih sredstev glede na postopke za reševanje in prestrukturiranje ter likvidacijo družb;
buying shares of companies carrying out special projects.
kupovanje delnic družb, ki izvajajo posebne projekte.
Livestock farmers operating in the production, processing and marketing of meat products.
Živinorejci, ki delujejo na področju proizvodnje, predelave in trženja mesnih izdelkov.
The total updated budget to carry out the integrated projects amounts to:
Skupni posodobljeni proračun za izvajanje celostnih projektov znaša:
Law No 252/91: ITL 97015515581 (about EUR 50 million);
za Zakon št. 252/91: 97015515581 ITL (približno 50 milijonov EUR);
Law No 67/88 (development loans): ITL 6349660726 (about EUR 3,280 million);
za Zakon št. 67/88 (posojila za razvoj): 6349660726 ITL (približno 3,280 milijona EUR);
Law No 67/88 (consolidation loans): ITL 1968222804 (about EUR 1,016 million).
za Zakon št. 67/88 (konsolidacijska posojila): 1968222804 ITL (približno 1,016 milijona EUR).
Article 5 of Law No 290/99 lays down the conditions under which the credit subsidies on loans contracted under specific legislative acts can continue to apply even where some of the conditions initially laid down have not been met.
Člen 5 Zakona št. 290/99 določa pogoje, pod katerimi se lahko kreditne subvencije na posojila, najeta v skladu s posebnimi zakonodajnimi akti, še naprej uporabljajo, čeprav nekateri začetni pogoji niso izpolnjeni.
At the time the Commission decided to initiate the procedure provided for by Article 88(2) of the Treaty, no background information was available on the Laws referred to by Article 5, which are strictly related to the assessment of the abovementioned Article.
Ko se je Komisija odločila za začetek postopka iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe, ni bilo na voljo osnovnih informacij o zakonih iz člena 5, ki sta tesno povezana z oceno navedenega člena.
The Italian authorities sent the texts of these two laws (Law No 252/91 and Law No 67/88) to the Commission at its express request.
Italijanski organi so besedilo teh dveh zakonov (Zakon št. 252/91 in Zakon št. 67/88) poslali Komisiji na njeno izrecno zahtevo.
However, when the Commission decided to initiate the procedure provided for by Article 88(2) of the Treaty, the Italian authorities had supplied no further information or additional data on these laws or on the aid measures they set up.
Ko se je Komisija odločila za začetek postopka iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe, italijanski organi vseeno niso zagotovili dodatnih informacij ali dodatnih podatkov v zvezi s tema zakonoma ali ukrepi pomoči, ki so jih sprejeli.
The Commission was not in a position to decide whether Article 5 of Law No 290/99 related to aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty because Italian authorities had not provided clear information on the issue.
Komisija ni mogla odločiti, ali je člen 5 Zakona št. 290/99 povezan s pomočjo v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES, ker italijanski organi niso zagotovili jasnih informacij v zvezi s to zadevo.
However, by enabling certain agricultural undertakings to continue to benefit from specific aid measures even in cases of non-compliance with all the initial eligibility requirements, the measure seemed to favour these undertakings with respect to those which, in the same situation, were compliant.
Vendar se zdi, da daje ukrep, potem ko se je nekaterim kmetijskim gospodarstvom omogočilo, da imajo še naprej korist zaradi posebnih ukrepov pomoči tudi v primerih neskladnosti z vsemi prvotnimi pogoji za upravičenost, prednost tem kmetijskim gospodarstvom v primerjavi z gospodarstvi, ki so poskrbela za skladnost ne glede na posebne ukrepe pomoči.
As a consequence, the measure provided for by Article 5 led to at least a presumption of aid which, in the absence of information on the part of the Italian authorities, could only be clarified by initiating the procedure provided for by Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty.
Zato se je zaradi ukrepa iz člena 5 vsaj domnevalo o pomoči, ki se lahko ob pomanjkanju informacij s strani italijanskih organov pojasni le z začetkom postopka iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe ES.
Moreover, Article 5 of Law No 290/99 could not be assessed in isolation from the instruments which constituted the legal basis for granting those particular benefits (credit subsidies and financing) it referred to, namely Article 15(16) of Law No 67/88 and Law No 252/91.
Poleg tega se člen 5 Zakona št. 290/99 ne more oceniti ločeno od instrumentov, ki so pravna podlaga za dodelitev posebnih ugodnosti (kreditne subvencije in finančna sredstva) in katere zadeva, tj. člen 15(16) Zakona št. 67/88 in Zakon št. 252/91.
The texts of these instruments were sent by the Italian authorities to the Commission at its express request.
Besedila teh instrumentov so italijanski organi poslali Komisiji na njeni izrecno zahtevo.
They clearly provide for State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Ta besedila jasno določajo državno pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.