natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The complete aggregate sample shall be finely ground (where relevant) and thoroughly mixed using a process that has been demonstrated to achieve complete homogenisation.
Sestavljeni vzorec se drobno zmelje (kjer je to ustrezno) in dobro premeša po postopku, s katerim se dokazano doseže popolna homogenizacija.
The samples for enforcement, defence and referee purposes shall be taken from the homogenised material unless this conflicts with the rules of the Member States on sampling as regards the rights of the food business operator.
Enakovredni vzorci za izvršbo, prepoved in sodno izvedenstvo se jemljejo iz homogeniziranega materiala, če to ni v nasprotju s pravili držav članic o vzorčenju v zvezi s pravicami nosilca živilske dejavnosti.
METHODS OF ANALYSIS
ANALITSKE METODE
The following definitions shall apply:
Uporabljajo se naslednje opredelitve:
Repeatability the value below which the absolute difference between single test results obtained under repeatability conditions (i.e., same sample, same operator, same apparatus, same laboratory, and short interval of time) may be expected to lie within a specific probability (typically 95 %) and hence r = 2,8 × sr.
ponovljivost, vrednost manjša od absolutne razlike dveh posameznih rezultatov preizkusa, dobljenih pri pogojih ponovljivosti (npr. isti vzorec, isti izvajalec, ista naprava, isti laboratorij in kratek časovni interval), znotraj določene verjetnosti (običajno 95 %) in zato je r = 2,8 × sr.
Standard deviation calculated from results generated under repeatability conditions.
standardni odmik, izračunan iz rezultatov, dobljenih pri pogojih ponovljivosti.
Relative standard deviation calculated from results generated under repeatability conditions [(sr/
relativni standardni odmik, izračunan iz rezultatov, dobljenih pri pogojih ponovljivosti [(sr/
Reproducibility the value below which the absolute difference between single test results obtained under reproducibility conditions (i.e., on identical material obtained by operators in different laboratories, using the standardised test method), may be expected to lie within a certain probability (typically 95 %); R = 2,8 × sR.
obnovljivost, vrednost, manjša od absolutne razlike dveh posameznih rezultatov preizkusa, dobljenih pri pogojih obnovljivosti (npr. na istem materialu, ki so ju izvajalci dobili z uporabo standardizirane preskusne metode v različnih laboratorijih), znotraj določene verjetnosti (ponavadi 95 %); R = 2,8 × sR.
Relative standard deviation calculated from results generated under reproducibility conditions [(sR/
Relativni standardni odmik, izračunan iz rezultatov, dobljenih pri pogojih obnovljivosti [(sR/
Limit of detection, smallest measured content, from which it is possible to deduce the presence of the analyte with reasonable statistical certainty.
meja zaznavnosti, najmanjša izmerjena vsebnost, ki omogoča sklepanje o prisotnosti analizirane snovi s sprejemljivo statistično gotovostjo.
The limit of detection is numerically equal to three times the standard deviation of the mean of blank determinations (n > 20).
Meja zaznavnosti je številčno enaka trikratnemu standardnemu odklonu srednje vrednosti slepih določitev (n > 20).
Limit of quantification, lowest content of the analyte which can be measured with reasonable statistical certainty.
meja določljivosti, najmanjša vsebnost analizirane snovi, ki se lahko izmeri s sprejemljivo statistično gotovostjo.
If both accuracy and precision are constant over a concentration range around the limit of detection, then the limit of quantification is numerically equal to six or 10 times the standard deviation of the mean of blank determinations (n > 20).
Če sta točnost in natančnost konstantni v območju koncentracij okrog meje zaznavnosti, je meja določljivosti številčno enaka šestkratnemu do desetkratnemu standardnemu odklonu srednje vrednosti slepih določitev (n > 20).
The observed RSDr divided by the RSDr value estimated from the Horwitz equation [5] using the assumption r = 0,66R.
upoštevani RSDr, deljen z vrednostjo RSDr, dobljeno s Horwitzovo enačbo [5] z uporabo predpostavke r = 0,66R.
The observed RSDR value divided by the RSDR value calculated from the Horwitz equation.
upoštevana vrednost RSDR, deljena z vrednostjo RSDR, izračunana s Horwitzovo enačbo.
Standard measurement uncertainty.
standardna negotovost meritve.
The expanded measurement uncertainty, using a coverage factor of 2 which gives a level of confidence of approximately 95 % (U = 2u).
razširjena merilna negotovost z uporabo faktorja pokritja 2, ki pomeni stopnjo zaupanja približno 95 % (U = 2u).
Maximum standard measurement uncertainty.
najvišja standardna negotovost meritve.
Methods of analysis used for food control purposes shall comply with the provisions of points 1 and 2 of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 882/2004.
Analitske metode, uporabljene za nadzor živil, so v skladu z določbami iz točk 1 in 2 Priloge III k Uredbi (ES) št. 882/2004.
Methods of analysis for total tin are appropriate for official control on inorganic tin levels.
Analitske metode za celoten kositer so ustrezne za uradni nadzor vsebnosti anorganskega kositra.
Where no specific methods for the determination of contaminants in foodstuffs are prescribed at Community level, laboratories may select any validated method of analysis (where possible, the validation shall include a certified reference material) provided the selected method meets the specific performance criteria set out in Tables 5 to 7.
Kjer na ravni Skupnosti ni predpisanih metod za določanje onesnaževalcev v živilih, lahko laboratoriji izberejo katero koli validirano metodo (kadar je to mogoče, validacija vključuje tudi certificirani referenčni material), pod pogojem, da izbrana metoda izpolnjuje posebne zahteve, določene v preglednicah 5–7.
Performance criteria for methods of analysis for lead, cadmium, mercury and inorganic tin
Izvedbena merila za analitske metode za svinec, kadmij, živo srebro in anorganski kositer
Foods specified in Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006
Živila, navedena v Uredbi (ES) št. 1881/2006
For inorganic tin less than 5 mg/kg.
Za anorganski kositer manj kot 5 mg/kg.
For other elements less than one tenth of the maximum level in Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006, except if the maximum level for lead is less than 100 μg/kg.
Za druge elemente manj kot ena desetina mejne vrednosti iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1881/2006, razen, če je mejna vrednost za svinec manj kot 100 μg/kg.
For the latter, less than one fifth of the maximum level
V zadnjem primeru velja ena petina mejne vrednosti.
For inorganic tin less than 10 mg/kg.
Za anorganski kositer manj kot 10 mg/kg.
For other elements less than one fifth of the maximum level in Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006, except if the maximum level for lead is less than 100 μg/kg.
Za druge elemente manj kot ena petina mejne vrednosti iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1881/2006, razen, če je mejna vrednost za svinec manj kot 100 μg/kg.
For the latter, less than two fifth of the maximum level
V zadnjem primeru veljata dve petini mejne vrednosti.
HORRATr or HORRATR values of less than 2
HORRATr ali HORRATR vrednosti manj kot 2
The provisions of point D.1.2. apply
Uporabljajo se določbe točke D.1.2.
Free from matrix or spectral interferences
Brez spektralnih interferenc ali vpliva matriksa.
Performance criteria for methods of analysis for 3-MCPD
Izvedbena merila za analitske metode za 3-MCPD
Concentration
Nasičenost
Field blanks
Terenski slepi vzorec
Less than the LOD
manj kot LOD
all
vsi
5 μg/kg (or less) on a dry matter basis
5 μg/kg (ali manj) na podlagi suhe snovi
10 μg/kg (or less) on a dry matter basis
10 μg/kg (ali manj) na podlagi suhe snovi
Performance criteria for methods of analysis for benzo(a)pyrene
Izvedbena merila za analitske metode za benzo-a-piren
Less than 0,3 μg/kg
Manj kot 0,3 μg/kg
Less than 0,9 μg/kg
Manj kot 0,9 μg/kg
Where a limited number of fully validated methods of analysis exist, alternatively, a ‘fitness-for-purpose’ approach may be used to assess the suitability of the method of analysis.
Kadar obstaja omejeno število popolnoma validiranih analitskih metod, se alternativno lahko za oceno ustreznosti analitske metode uporabi pristop „ustreznost namenu“.
Methods suitable for official control must produce results with standard measurement uncertainties less than the maximum standard measurement uncertainty calculated using the formula below:
Metode, primerne za uradni nadzor, morajo dati rezultate v okviru najvišje standardne negotovosti, in sicer manj kot najvišja standardna negotovost meritve, izračunana s spodnjo formulo:
Uf is the maximum standard measurement uncertainty (μg/kg);
Uf najvišja standardna negotovost (μg/kg);
LOD is the limit of detection of the method (μg/kg);
LOD meja zaznavnosti metode (μg/kg);
C is the concentration of interest (μg/kg);
C izbrana koncentracija (μg/kg);
α is a numeric factor to be used depending on the value of C. The values to be used are given in Table 8.
α numerični faktor, ki se uporablja odvisno od vrednosti C. Vrednosti, ki se jih uporablja, so navedene v preglednici 8.
Numeric values to be used for α as constant in formula set out in this point, depending on the concentration of interest
Numerične vrednosti, ki jih je treba uporabljati za α: kot konstanto v formuli, določeni v tej točki, glede na izbrano koncentracijo
REPORTING AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
POROČANJE IN RAZLAGA REZULTATOV
The results shall be expressed in the same units and with the same number of significant figures as the maximum levels laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006.
Rezultati analize mejne vrednosti se izrazijo z istimi enotami in zaokrožijo na enako število decimalnih mest, kakor je določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 1881/2006.
Recovery calculations
Izračun izkoristka
If an extraction step is applied in the analytical method, the analytical result shall be corrected for recovery.
Če je bil v analitski metodi uporabljen postopek ekstrakcije, je treba v rezultatu analize upoštevati korekcijo zaradi izkoristka.
In this case the level of recovery must be reported.
V tem primeru je treba poročati o ravni izkoristka.
In case no extraction step is applied in the analytical method (e.g. in case of metals), the result may be reported uncorrected for recovery if evidence is provided by ideally making use of suitable certified reference material that the certified concentration allowing for the measurement uncertainty is achieved (i.e. high accuracy of the measurement).
V primeru neuporabe postopka ekstrakcije v analitski metodi (npr. v primeru kovin), je treba rezultat sporočiti brez korekcije izkoristka, če je s pravilno uporabo ustreznega referenčnega materiala dokazano, da je dosežena certificirana vrednost za dosego merilne negotovosti (tj. visoka natančnost meritve).
In case the result is reported uncorrected for recovery this shall be mentioned.
Navesti je treba, če je rezultat sporočen brez korekcije izkoristka.
Measurement uncertainty
Merilna negotovost
The analytical result shall be reported as x +/– U whereby x is the analytical result and U is the expanded measurement uncertainty, using a coverage factor of 2 which gives a level of confidence of approximately 95 % (U = 2u).
Rezultat analize mora biti izražen kot x +/– U, pri čemer je x rezultat analize, U pa razširjena merilna negotovost, kar pri količniku zajetja 2 pomeni približno stopnjo zaupanja 95 % (U = 2u).
The analyst shall note the ‘Report on the relationship between analytical results, measurement uncertainty, recovery factors and the provisions in EU food and feed legislation’ [7].
Analitik mora biti seznanjen s „Poročilom o razmerju med rezultati analize, merilno negotovostjo, faktorjih izkoristka in določbami zakonodaje EU o hrani in krmi“ [7].
INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
RAZLAGA REZULTATOV
Acceptance of a lot/sublot
Sprejemljivost lota/sublota
The lot or sublot is accepted if the analytical result of the laboratory sample does not exceed the respective maximum level as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 taking into account the expanded measurement uncertainty and correction of the result for recovery if an extraction step has been applied in the analytical method used.
Lot ali sublot je sprejemljiv, če rezultat analize laboratorijskega vzorca ne presega posameznih mejnih vrednosti, določenih v Uredbi (ES) št. 1881/2006, ob upoštevanju razširjene merilne negotovosti in popravka rezultata za izkoristek, če je bil v uporabljeni analitski metodi uporabljen postopek ekstrakcije.
Rejection of a lot/sublot
Zavrnitev lota/sublota
The lot or sublot is rejected if the analytical result of the laboratory sample exceeds beyond reasonable doubt the respective maximum level as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 taking into account the expanded measurement uncertainty and correction of the result for recovery if an extraction step has been applied in the analytical method used.
Lot ali sublot se zavrne, če rezultat analize laboratorijskega vzorca utemeljeno presega posamezne mejne vrednosti, določene v Uredbi (ES) št. 1881/2006, ob upoštevanju razširjene merilne negotovosti in popravka rezultata za izkoristek, če je bil v uporabljeni analitski metodi uporabljen postopek ekstrakcije.
The present interpretation rules shall apply for the analytical result obtained on the sample for enforcement.
Sedanja pravila razlage se uporabljajo za rezultat analitskega preskušanja, dobljenega na vzorcu za uradni nadzor.
In case of analysis for defence or reference purposes, the national rules shall apply.
V primeru analize za dopolnilno izvedensko mnenje ali referenčne namene se uporabljajo nacionalna pravila.
As amended by Article 18 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2076/2005 (OJ L 338, 22.12.2005, p. 83).
Kakor je bil spremenjen s členom 18 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 2076/2005 (UL L 338, 22.12.2005, str. 83).
Edited by M. Thompson and R. Wood, Pure Appl.
Priredila M. Thompson in R. Wood, Pure Appl.
Standard EN 13804:2002, ‘Foodstuffs — Determination of trace elements — Performance criteria, general considerations and sample preparation’, CEN, Rue de Stassart 36, B-1050 Brussels.
Standard EN 13804:2002, „Živila – Kvantitativno določanje elementov v sledi – Izvedbena merila in splošna obravnava“, CEN, Rue de Stassart 36, B–1050 Bruselj.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1293/2005 (OJ L 205, 6.8.2005, p. 12).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1293/2005 (UL L 205, 6.8.2005, str. 12).
‘The international harmonized protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories’ by M. Thompson, S.L.R. Ellison and R. Wood, Pure Appl.
„Mednarodni harmonizirani protokol za preskus strokovnosti kemičnih analitskih laboratorijev“, M. Thompson, S.L.R., Ellison and R. Wood, Pure Appl.
designated part of a large lot in order to apply the sampling method on that designated part. Each sublot must be physically separated and identifiable;
je del večjega lota, ki je določen za vzorčenje, vsak sublot mora biti fizično ločen od preostalega dela lota in določljiv.
For the analysis of lead in wine, Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2676/90 [6] lays down the method to be used in chapter 35 of its Annex.C.3.3. Specific requirements
Za analizo svinca v vinu Uredba Komisije (EGS) št. 2676/90 [6] v poglavju 35 Priloge določa metodo, ki jo je treba uporabiti.C.3.3 Izvedbena merila
Commission Regulation (EC) No 334/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 334/2007
amending Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of the European Parliament and the Council on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency
o spremembi Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1592/2002 o skupnih predpisih na področju civilnega letalstva in ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost v letalstvu
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2002 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency [1], and in particular Article 6(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1592/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. julija 2002 o skupnih predpisih na področju civilnega letalstva in ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost v letalstvu [1] in zlasti člena 6(2) Uredbe,
Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council requires products, parts and appliances to comply with the environmental protection requirements of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation (hereinafter ‘Chicago Convention’) as issued in March 2002 for Volume I and November 1999 for Volume II, except for its Appendices.
Člen 6(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1592/2002 zahteva, da proizvodi, deli in naprave izpolnjujejo okoljevarstvene zahteve iz Priloge 16 h Konvenciji o mednarodnem civilnem letalskem prometu (v nadaljnjem besedilu Čikaška konvencija), kakor je bila objavljena marca 2002, za Zvezek I in novembra 1999 za Zvezek II, razen njenih dodatkov.
The Chicago Convention and its annexes have been amended since the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002.
Čikaška konvencija in njene priloge so bile spremenjene od sprejetja Uredbe (ES) št. 1592/2002.
Therefore Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 should be amended in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 54(3) of the same Regulation.
Zato je treba spremeniti tudi Uredbo (ES) št. 1592/2002 v skladu s postopkom iz člena 54(3) iste uredbe.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the European Aviation Safety Agency Committee established by Article 54 of Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora Evropske agencije za varnost v letalstvu, ustanovljenega s členom 54 Uredbe (ES) št. 1592/2002 –
In Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002, the first paragraph is replaced by the following:
V členu 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 1592/2002 se prvi odstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
Products, parts and appliances shall comply with the environmental protection requirements contained in Amendment 8 of Volume I and in Amendment 5 of Volume II of Annex 16 to the Chicago Convention as applicable on 24 November 2005, except for the Appendices to Annex 16.’
Proizvodi, deli in naprave morajo izpolnjevati zahteve o varstvu okolja iz spremembe 8 Zvezka I in spremembe 5 Zvezka II Priloge 16 Čikaške konvencije, kakor se uporablja z dne 24. novembra 2005, razen dodatkov k Prilogi 16.“
Commission Regulation (EC) No 335/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 335/2007
amending Regulation (EC) No 1702/2003 as regards the implementing rules related to environmental certification of aircraft and related products, parts and appliances
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1702/2003 o določitvi izvedbenih določb za certificiranje zrakoplovov in sorodnih proizvodov, delov in naprav glede plovnosti in okoljske ustreznosti
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2002 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency [1], and in particular Articles 5 and 6 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1592/2002 z dne 15. julija 2002 o skupnih predpisih na področju civilnega letalstva in ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost v letalstvu [1] ter zlasti členov 5 in 6 Uredbe,
One of the objectives of Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 is to assist the Member States in fulfilling their obligations under the Chicago Convention by providing a common and uniform implementation of its provisions.
Eden od ciljev Uredbe (ES) št. 1592/2002 je pomoč državam članicam pri izpolnjevanju njihovih obveznosti v okviru Čikaške konvencije z zagotovitvijo skupnega in enotnega izvajanja njenih določb.
Article 2(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1702/2003 establishes that products, parts and appliances shall be issued certificates as specified in its Annex (Part 21).
Člen 2(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1702/2003 določa, da se za proizvode, dele in naprave izdajo certifikati, kakor je opredeljeno v njeni Prilogi (del 21).
Appendix VI of the Annex (Part 21) to Regulation (EC) No 1702/2003 specifies the EASA Form 45 to be used for issuing Noise Certificates.
Dodatek VI Priloge (del 21) k Uredbi (ES) št. 1702/2003 določa, da se uporabi obrazec EASA 45 za izdajo spričeval o hrupu.
Volume I of Annex 16 to the Chicago Convention was amended on 23 February 2005 as regards the standards and guidelines for the administration of Noise Certification Documentation.
Zvezek I Priloge 16 h Čikaški konvenciji je bil spremenjen dne 23. februarja 2005 v zvezi s standardi in smernicami za upravljanje dokumentacije o spričevalih o hrupu.
Some modifications to the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1702/2003 are needed to bring its Annex in line with the amended Volume I of Annex 16.
Nekatere spremembe določb Uredbe (ES) št. 1702/2003 so potrebne za uskladitev njene priloge s spremenjenim zvezkom I Priloge 16.
Regulation (EC) No 1702/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 1702/2003 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The measures provided for by this Regulation are based on the opinion issued by the Agency in accordance with Articles 12(2)(b) and 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002.
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, temeljijo na mnenju Agencije v skladu s členom 12(2)(b) in členom 14(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1592/2002.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 54(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 54(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1592/2002 –
The Annex (Part 21) to Regulation (EC) No 1702/2003 is amended as follows:
Priloga (del 21) k Uredbi (ES) št. 1702/2003 se spremeni:
In Part 21A.204(b)(1)(ii), the sentence ‘This information shall be included in the flight manual, when a flight manual is required by the applicable airworthiness code for the particular aircraft’ is deleted;
V delu 21A.204(b)(1)(ii) se stavek „Te informacije morajo biti vključene v priročnik za letenje, če veljavna plovnostna koda za določen zrakoplov zahteva priročnik za letenje“ črta.
In Part 21A.204(b)(2)(i), the sentence ‘This information shall be included in the flight manual, when a flight manual is required by the applicable airworthiness code for the particular aircraft’ is deleted;
V delu 21A.204(b)(2)(i) se stavek „Te informacije morajo biti vključene v priročnik za letenje, če veljavna plovnostna koda za določen zrakoplov zahteva priročnik za letenje“ črta.
Appendix VI is replaced by the Annex to this Regulation.
Dodatek VI se nadomesti s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
Appendix VI — EASA Form 45 Noise Certificate of the Annex (Part 21) is substituted by the following:
Dodatek VI – Obrazec EASA 45 „Spričevalo o hrupu“ Priloge (del 21) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
For use by State of registry
Izpolni država registracije
NOISE CERTIFICATE
SPRIČEVALO O HRUPU
Document No:
Številka dokumenta:
Registration marks:
Državljanstvo in registracijske oznake:
Manufacturer and manufacturer’s designation of aircraft:
Proizvajalec in proizvajalčeva oznaka zrakoplova:
Aircraft serial No:
Serijska številka zrakoplova:
Propeller: (*)
Propeler: (*)
Maximum take-off mass (kg)
Skupna vzletna masa (kg):
Maximum landing mass (kg) (*)
Skupna pristajalna masa (kg): (*)
Noise certification standard:
Standard za certifikacijo hrupa:
Additional modifications incorporated for the purpose of compliance with the applicable noise certification standards:
Dodatne spremembe, izvršene zaradi skladnosti z veljavnimi standardi za izdajo spričevala o hrupu:
Lateral/full-power noise level: (*)
Bočna raven hrupa/Raven hrupa pri polni moči: (*)
Approach noise level (*)
Raven hrupa med priletom: (*)
Flyover noise level (*)
Raven hrupa med preletom (točke) pri vzletu: (*)
Overflight noise level (*)
Raven hrupa med preletom (točke) na ruti: (*)
Take-off noise level (*)
Raven hrupa pri vzletu: (*)