natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The facts also showed that flights in winter only operated from Fiumicino and Linate.
Sicer se zdi, da se pravzaprav poleti v zimskem času opravljajo le na letališčih Fiumicino in Linate.
In this case, the Commission doubts the need for this measure, which it deems disproportionate to the objectives of ensuring mobility to the mainland and territorial cohesion.
V tem primeru Komisija dvomi o potrebnosti tovrstnega ukrepa, za katerega meni, da je nesorazmeren glede na postavljene cilje, ki so zagotoviti mobilnosti proti celini in ozemeljsko povezanost.
The direct effect of this measure is to sideline occasional carriers, without affecting the principle of the PSOs, and to contribute to a definitive closure of the market to new operators on competitive routes, notably during the summer.
Neposredna posledica tega ukrepa je pravzaprav odvrnitev priložnostnih letalskih prevoznikov, ne da bi vplivali na načelo OJS, in prispevek k dokončnemu zaprtju tržišča za nove letalske prevoznike na najbolj konkurenčnih letalskih progah, zlasti poleti.
However the Italian Republic recognised that the airport hub of Malpensa played an essential role in international connections, whilst Ciampino and Bergamo airports, as a hub for low-cost companies, contributed to the EU principle of economic and social cohesion and to achieving the objective of territorial cohesion linking an island like Sardinia with other European regions.
Republika Italija je kljub vsemu priznala, da je letalsko vozlišče v Malpensi imelo odločilno vlogo za mednarodne letalske povezave, medtem ko sta letališči v Ciampinu in Bergamu, kot notranji vozlišči za nizkocenovne prevoznike, omogočili odgovor na načelo Skupnosti o gospodarski in socialni koheziji ter uresničevanje cilja ozemeljske povezanosti za otoka, kakršen je Sardinija, z vsemi regijami Evrope.
Therefore the Italian Republic has undertaken to amend Decree No 35 so that the PSO does not apply to Malpensa, Bergamo and Ciampino airports [20].
Posledica tega je bila, da je Republika Italija sprejela obvezo, da bo spremenila odlok št. 35 zato, da se OJS ne bi uporabile na letališčih v Malpensi, Bergamu in Ciampinu [20].
The Commission considers that this commitment does allay the doubts that could be raised and that amending the Decree in this way would substantially help to reduce the impact of undue restrictions imposed by the PSOs by meeting the mobility needs of Sardinia without placing disproportionate restrictions on the markets concerned.
Komisija meni, da ta obveza učinkovito odgovori na dvome, ki se lahko pojavijo, in da bi taka sprememba odloka omogočila pomembno zmanjšanje vpliva neupravičenih omejitev, ki so jih uvedle OJS, pri čemer se odziva na potrebe po mobilnosti Sardinije, ne da bi zadevnim tržiščem prinesla nesorazmerne omejitve.
Given this commitment made by the Italian Republic, the Commission does not intend to pursue its analysis of the disproportionate nature of applying the regime to all airports in Milan and Rome, whilst reserving the right, if necessary, to return to this aspect for current and future PSOs.
Glede na to obvezo Republike Italije Komisija ne namerava nadaljevati svoje analize nesorazmernega značaja uporabe na vseh letaliških sistemih v Milanu in Rimu, pri čemer si zadrži možnost, da po potrebi ponovno prouči ta vidik v zvezi s sedanjimi in prihodnjimi OJS.
On the basis of the information provided by the Italian Republic, the Commission does not call into question the principle of applying a PSO to routes between Sardinia and mainland Italy, which, regarding frequency, capacity and fares, may be necessary to ensure an adequate provision of services on the routes concerned.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je zagotovila Republika Italija, Komisija ne dvomi o načelu uporabe OJS na letalskih progah med Sardinijo in italijansko celino, ki se lahko, kar zadeva pogostosti letov in zmogljivosti ter prevoznine, izkaže za potrebno za zagotavljanje izvajanja ustreznih prevozov na zadevnih progah.
Nonetheless, the Commission considers that some of the conditions imposed by Decrees Nos 35 and 36 of the Italian Republic are unduly restrictive or disproportionate.
Vendar pa Komisija meni, da so nekateri pogoji, ki sta jih uvedla odloka št. 35 in 36 Republike Italije, neupravičeno omejevalni ali nesorazmerni.
The Commission considers that, as a result of the PSOs imposed under Article 4(1)(a) of the Regulation, any carrier intending to accept the PSOs must be able to operate on this route, regardless of the period in which it intends to commence service provision.
Komisija meni, da OJS, uvedene v skladu s členom 4(1)(a) Uredbe, pomenijo, da lahko vsak letalski prevoznik, ki namerava spoštovati OJS, opravlja prevoze na tej progi ne glede na čas, ko namerava začeti opravljati te storitve.
Therefore setting a deadline for submitting applications which from the outset excludes all operators submitting applications after that deadline is unduly restrictive and incompatible with the Regulation.
Posledica tega je, da je uvedba roka za predložitev kandidature, ki že vnaprej izključuje vsakega letalskega prevoznika, ki predloži svojo kandidaturo po tem roku, neupravičeno omejevalna in ni v skladu z Uredbo.
Although it may appear legitimate to provide for a duration of continuity of services, the Commission considers that, to comply with the principle of proportionality, the duration must be set within reasonable limits and that a PSO regime under Article 4(1)(a) may not exceed one year.
Če se zdi utemeljeno določiti neprekinjeno izvajanje prevozov, Komisija meni, da mora upoštevanje načela sorazmernosti pripeljati do tega, da bo trajanje prevozov v razumnih mejah in da v režimu OJS ne bo preseglo enega leta v skladu s členom 4(1)(a).
The Commission considers that the powers given to ENAC to coordinate the activities of operators to avoid overcapacity are unduly restrictive and incompatible with the Regulation.
Komisija meni, da so pristojnosti, dodeljene ENAC-u za usklajevanje dejavnosti letalskih prevoznikov z namenom, da bi se izognili preveliki zmogljivosti, neupravičeno omejevalne in da niso v skladu z Uredbo.
The Commission notes that grouping the routes Olbia-Rome and Olbia-Milan on the one hand and Alghero-Rome and Alghero-Milan on the other is unduly restrictive and incompatible with the Regulation.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je združevanje prog Olbia–Rim in Olbia–Milano na eni strani ter Alghero–Rim in Alghero–Milano na drugi neupravičeno omejevalno in da ni v skladu z Uredbo.
The Commission considers that the application of reduced fares for persons born in Sardinia but not resident there is disproportionate and incompatible with the Regulation.
Komisija ocenjuje, da uporaba znižanih prevoznin za osebe, rojene na Sardiniji, ki ne tam prebivajo, ni sorazmerna in ni v skladu z Uredbo.
The Commission doubts the need to apply the PSOs to all airports in Rome and Milan, which it considers to be disproportionate to the objectives of ensuring mobility to the mainland and territorial cohesion.
Komisija dvomi o potrebi uvedbe OJS v vse sisteme na letališčih v Rimu in Milanu, za katero meni, da je nesorazmerna glede na postavljene cilje, ki so zagotoviti mobilnost proti celini in ozemeljsko povezanost.
However, given the commitment made by the Italian Republic to amend Decree No 35 so that the PSOs do not apply to Bergamo, Malpensa or Ciampino airports, the Commission will not pursue its analysis, although it reserves the right, if necessary, to return to this aspect for current and future PSOs,
Vendar pa glede na obvezo Republike Italije, da bo spremenila odlok št. 35, da ne bi uvajal OJS na letališčih v Bergamu, Malpensi in Ciampinu, Komisija ne nadaljuje s svojo analizo, pri čemer si zadrži možnost, da po potrebi ponovno prouči ta vidik v zvezi s sedanjimi in prihodnjimi OJS –
The Italian Republic may continue to apply the public service obligations (‘PSOs’) imposed by Decrees Nos 35 and 36 issued by the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport on 29 December 2005 (published in the Italian Official Gazette on 11 January 2006) on a total of 16 routes connecting the three airports in Sardinia with several national airports on mainland Italy, published respectively on 24 March 2006 (Decree No 35) and 21 April 2006 (Decree No 36) in the Official Journal of the European Union, in accordance with Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes, subject to compliance with the following conditions:
Republika Italija lahko še naprej uvaja obveznosti javnih služb („OJS“), naložene z odlokoma št. 35 in 36 Ministrstva za infrastrukturo in promet z dne 29. decembra 2005 (objavljenima v Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana11. januarja 2006) na skupno 16 progah, ki povezujejo vsa tri letališča na Sardiniji z več nacionalnimi letališči v italijanski prestolnici, ki sta bila objavljena 24. marca 2006 (odlok št. 35) in 21. aprila 2006 (odlok št. 36) v Uradnem listu Evropske unije v skladu s členom 4(1)(a) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2408/92 o dostopu letalskih prevoznikov Skupnosti do letalskih prog znotraj Skupnosti, ob upoštevanju naslednjih pogojev:
All air carriers intending to accept the PSOs must be able to operate the route concerned, regardless of the period in which they notified their intention to commence service provision and whether or not notification was sent during or after the 30-day period set in the Decrees.
Letalski prevoznik, ki namerava spoštovati OJS, mora imeti možnost opravljati prevoze na zadevni progi ne glede na čas, ko je objavil svojo namero, da začne opravljati svoje storitve in na to, da je bila ta objava dana v ali po obdobju 30 dni, predvidenem z obema odlokoma.
Air carriers must not be obliged to provide a duration of continuity of service under the PSO regime in excess of one year.
Letalskim prevoznikom naj ne bo določeno trajanje izvajanja neprekinjenih prevozov v okviru OJS, ki presega eno leto.
The Italian authorities must reassess the need to maintain a PSO on a route and the level of obligations imposed on each carrier as soon as a new carrier commences operations or gives notification of its intention to operate that route and, in any case, once a year.
Italijanski organi bodo morali znova oceniti potrebo po ohranitvi uvedbe OJS na zadevni letalski progi, kakor tudi raven obveznosti, naloženih vsakemu prevozniku, ko začne novi letalski prevoznik opravljati prevoze ali ko pisno sporoči svojo namero, da bo opravljal prevoze na tej progi, vsekakor pa enkrat letno.
The Italian authorities must not prevent air carriers from providing a higher level of services on the routes than the minimum requirements provided for by the PSOs with regard to frequency and capacity.
Italijanski organi ne smejo preprečevati letalskim prevoznikom, da opravljajo prevoze na zadevnih letalskih progah izven minimalnih zahtev v zvezi s pogostostjo letov in številom sedežev, predvidenimi z OJS.
Air carriers must not be obliged to offer preferential fares to persons born in Sardinia but not resident there.
Letalski prevozniki niso dolžni ponuditi znižanih prevoznin osebam, rojenim na Sardiniji, ki tam ne prebivajo.
The Italian authorities may not make the right to provide services on a route between two cities subject to an obligation to operate on another route between two cities.
Italijanski organi ne morejo pogojevati pravice o izvajanju prevozov na letalski progi med dvema mestoma z obveznostjo opravljanja prevozov na drugi progi med dvema mestoma.
The Italian Republic must notify the Commission of the measures taken to implement this Decision by 1 August 2007 at the latest.
Republika Italija mora pisno obvestiti Komisijo o sprejetih ukrepih za izvajanje te odločbe najpozneje 1. avgusta 2007.
OJ C 95, 22.4.2006, p. 9 to 27, 30.
UL C 95, 22.4.2006, str. 9–27, 30.
OJ C 51, 16.2.2001, p. 12 to 22.
UL C 51, 16.2.2001, str. 12–22.
OJ L 215, 5.8.2006, p. 31.
UL L 215, 5.8.2006, str. 31.
See the replies given by the Italian Republic dated 6 October and 15 November 2006 and the press release issued by ENAC on 23 May 2006.
Glej odgovore Republike Italije z dne 6. oktobra in 15. novembra 2006, kakor tudi sporočilo ENAC-a za javnost z dne 23. maja 2006.
Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92, 23 July 1992, Article 3(1).
Člen 3(1) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2408/92 z dne 23. julija 1992.
Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992, Article 4(1).
Člen 4(1)(a) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2408/92 z dne 23. julija 1992.
Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992, Article 4(1)(b).
Člen 4(1)(b) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2408/92 z dne 23. julija 1992.
Ruling of the Regional Administrative Tribunal of Lazio No 2436 of 17 March 2005.
Sodba TAR Lazia številka 2436 z dne 17. marca 2005.
Letter of the Italian Republic dated 15 November 2006, p. 2.
Pismo Republike Italije z dne 15. novembra 2006, str. 2.
Letter of the Italian Republic dated 15 November 2006, p. 11.
Pismo Republike Italije z dne 15. novembra 2006, str. 11.
Letter of the Italian Republic dated 6 October 2006, p. 72 to 74.
Pismo Republike Italije z dne 6. oktobra 2006, str. 72–74.
Point 1.2 of the Notice of 24 March 2006.
Točka 1.2 Sporočila z dne 24. marca 2006.
Letter of the Italian Republic dated 6 October 2006, p. 78.
Pismo Republike Italije z dne 6. oktobra 2006, str. 78.
Letter of the Italian Republic dated 15 November 2006, p. 3.
Pismo Republike Italije z dne 15. novembra 2006, str. 3.
These obligations were published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 7 October 2000 [5].
Te obveznosti so bile objavljene v Uradnem listu Evropske unije 7. oktobra 2000 [5].
In accordance with Article 4(1)(d) of the Regulation, the routes concerned were put out to tender to select the carriers authorised to operate them on an exclusive basis with financial compensation [6].
V skladu s členom 4(1)(d) Uredbe je bil pripravljen javni razpis za izbiro pooblaščenih letalskih prevoznikov za izključno opravljanje prevozov na letalskih progah, za katere so dobili finančno nadomestilo [6].
This grouping would therefore enable costs to be contained and capacity to be optimised, whilst better meeting the requirements of demand.
To združevanje bi torej omogočalo obvladovanje stroškov in optimizacijo zmogljivosti, pri čemer bi pobliže zadovoljilo potrebe povpraševanja.
Thus this grouping would not constitute a market restriction but conversely would be likely to attract more operators.
Tako to združevanje ne bi pomenilo omejevanja na trgu, temveč bi lahko nasprotno pritegnilo še več letalskih prevoznikov.
The Italian authorities replied by letter of 31 August 2006.
Italijanski organi so odgovorili z dopisom z dne 31. avgusta 2006.
The reply covered most of the questions raised.
Odgovor je zajel velik del postavljenih vprašanj.
Point 8 of the PSOs, as provided for in Decrees Nos 35 and 36, provides that ‘carriers intending to accept the PSOs contained in the Annex must present a formal acceptance to ENAC within 30 days of publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the Commission communication on imposing these public service obligations.’
V točki 8 OJS, kot jih določata odloka št. 35 in 36, je predpisano, da morajo „letalski prevozniki, ki želijo sprejeti OJS, vsebovane v tej prilogi, predložiti ENAC-u svoje uradno soglasje v roku 30 dni od dneva, ko je bilo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije objavljeno obvestilo Komisije o uvedbi prej navedenih obveznosti“.
This obligation even constitutes a condition for excluding any carrier that sends their acceptance one day ‘too late’.
Ta obveznost se je pravzaprav izkazala celo kot pogoj za izključitev letalskega prevoznika, ki je poslal tako soglasje en dan „prepozno“.
The requirement of a minimum period of operation is in accordance, in the case in point, with Article 4(1)(c) which states that ‘in instances where other forms of transport cannot ensure an adequate and uninterrupted service, the Member States concerned may include in the public service obligation the requirement that any air carrier intending to operate the route gives a guarantee that it will operate the route for a certain period, to be specified, in accordance with the other terms of the public service obligation’.
Zahteva glede minimalnega obdobja opravljanja storitve je v danem primeru v skladu s členom 4(1)(c), k predpisuje, da lahko „v primeru, ko druge oblike prevoza ne morejo zagotoviti primernega in neprekinjenega prevoza, zadevne države članice vključijo v OJS tudi zahtevo, da mora vsak letalski prevoznik, ki namerava opravljati prevoz na tej progi, jamčiti, da bo opravljal prevoz na progi določeno obdobje, ki naj se določi v skladu z drugimi pogoji OJS“.
The Commission considers that since Sardinia is an island and, in view of its distance from the mainland, other means of transport do not ensure an adequate alternative service.
Komisija pravzaprav ocenjuje, da zaradi otoške lege Sardinije in njene oddaljenosti od celine druge oblike prevoza ne zagotavljajo ustrezne nadomestne storitve.
of 8 May 2007
z dne 8. maja 2007
allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for the new active substances benalaxyl-M, fluoxastrobin, prothioconazole, spirodiclofen, spiromesifen and sulfuryl fluoride
o pooblastitvi držav članic za podaljšanje začasnih registracij, izdanih za nove aktivne snovi benalaksil-M, fluoksastrobin, protiokonazol, spirodiklofen, spiromesifen in sulfuril fluorid
(notified under document number C(2007) 1929)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 1929)
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in February 2002 Portugal received an application from Isagro, for the inclusion of the active substance benalaxyl-M in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
V skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS je Portugalska februarja 2002 prejela zahtevek podjetja Isagro za vključitev aktivne snovi benalaksil-M v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Commission Decision 2003/35/EC [2] confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.
Odločba Komisije 2003/35/ES [2] je potrdila, da je dokumentacija popolna in da načeloma izpolnjuje zahteve po podatkih in informacijah iz prilog II in III k navedeni direktivi.
In March 2002 the United Kingdom received an application from Bayer CropScience concerning fluoxastrobin.
Marca 2002 je Združeno kraljestvo prejelo zahtevek podjetja Bayer CropScience v zvezi z aktivno snovjo fluoksastrobin.
Decision 2003/35/EC confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.
Odločba 2003/35/ES je potrdila, da je dokumentacija popolna in da načeloma izpolnjuje zahteve po podatkih in informacijah iz prilog II in III k navedeni direktivi.
In March 2002 the United Kingdom received an application from Bayer CropScience concerning prothioconazole.
Marca 2002 je Združeno kraljestvo prejelo zahtevek podjetja Bayer CropScience v zvezi z aktivno snovjo protiokonazol.
In August 2001 the Netherlands received an application from Bayer AG concerning spirodiclofen.
Avgusta 2001 je Nizozemska prejela zahtevek podjetja Bayer AG v zvezi z aktivno snovjo spirodiklofen.
Commission Decision 2002/593/EC [3] confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.
Odločba Komisije 2002/593/ES [3] je potrdila, da je dokumentacija popolna in da načeloma izpolnjuje zahteve po podatkih in informacijah iz prilog II in III k navedeni direktivi.
In April 2002 the United Kingdom received an application from Bayer AG concerning spiromesifen.
Aprila 2002 je Združeno kraljestvo prejelo zahtevek podjetja Bayer AG v zvezi z aktivno snovjo spiromesifen.
Commission Decision 2003/105/EC [4] confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.
Odločba Komisije 2003/105/ES [4] je potrdila, da je dokumentacija popolna in da načeloma izpolnjuje zahteve po podatkih in informacijah iz prilog II in III k navedeni direktivi.
In July 2002 the United Kingdom received an application from Dow AgroSciences Ltd concerning sulfuryl fluoride.
Julija 2002 je Združeno kraljestvo prejelo zahtevek podjetja Dow AgroSciences Ltd. v zvezi z aktivno snovjo sulfuril fluorid.
Commission Decision 2003/305/EC [5], which used the name sulphuryl fluoride in the English version, confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.
Odločba Komisije 2003/305/ES [5], v angleški različici katere je uporabljen izraz „sulphuryl fluoride“, je potrdila, da je dokumentacija popolna in da načeloma izpolnjuje zahteve po podatkih in informacijah iz prilog II in III k navedeni direktivi.
Confirmation of the completeness of the dossiers was necessary in order to allow them to be examined in detail and to allow Member States the possibility of granting provisional authorisations, for periods of up to three years, for plant protection products containing the active substances concerned, while complying with the conditions laid down in Article 8(1) of Directive 91/414/EEC and, in particular, the condition relating to the detailed assessment of the active substances and the plant protection product in the light of the requirements laid down by that Directive.
Popolnost dokumentacij je bilo treba potrditi, da se omogoči njihova podrobna proučitev in da se državam članicam omogoči izdaja začasnih registracij za največ tri leta za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo zadevne aktivne snovi, ob izpolnjevanju pogojev iz člena 8(1) Direktive 91/414/EGS in zlasti pogoja v zvezi s podrobno oceno aktivne snovi in fitofarmacevtskega sredstva glede na zahteve iz navedene direktive.
For these active substances, the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed, in accordance with the provisions of Article 6(2) and (4) of Directive 91/414/EEC, for the uses proposed by the applicant.
Vplivi teh aktivnih snovi na zdravje ljudi in okolje so bili ocenjeni v skladu z določbami člena 6(2) in člena (4) Direktive 91/414/EGS za uporabe, ki jih predlaga vlagatelj.
The rapporteur Member States submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 4 December 2003 (benalaxyl-M), 14 October 2003 (fluoxastrobin), 20 October 2004 (prothioconazole), 18 May 2004 (spirodiclofen), 16 April 2004 (spiromesifen) and on 9 November 2004 (sulfuryl fluoride), respectively.
Države članice poročevalke so Komisiji predložile osnutke poročil o oceni, in sicer 4. decembra 2003 (benalaksil-M), 14. oktobra 2003 (fluoksastrobin), 20. oktobra 2004 (protiokonazol), 18. maja 2004 (spirodiklofen), 16. aprila 2004 (spiromesifen) in 9. novembra 2004 (sulfuril fluorid).
Following submission of the draft assessment reports by the rapporteur Member States, it has been found to be necessary to request further information from the applicants and to have the rapporteur Member States examine that information and submit their assessment.
Po predložitvi osnutkov poročil o oceni držav članic poročevalk je bilo ugotovljeno, da je treba od vlagateljev zahtevati nadaljnje informacije, ki jih mora država članica poročevalka pregledati in predložiti svojo oceno.
Therefore, the examination of the dossiers is still ongoing and it will not be possible to complete the evaluation within the timeframe provided for in Directive 91/414/EEC.
Zato pregled dokumentacije še vedno traja in ocenjevanja ne bo mogoče zaključiti v roku, predvidenem v Direktivi 91/414/EGS.