natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The results of the monitoring, including monitoring of sediment and biota, should, as far as required by Article 3 of Decision No 2455/2001/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2001 establishing the list of priority substances in the field of water policy [5], be made available in order to inform future Commission proposals under Article 16(4) and (8) of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Rezultati spremljanja stanja, tudi spremljanja sedimentov in živih organizmov, bi morali biti v skladu z zahtevami iz člena 3 Odločbe št. 2455/2001/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. novembra 2001 o določitvi seznama prednostnih snovi na področju vodne politike [5] dostopni za informiranje za prihodnje predloge Komisije po členu 16(4) in (8) Direktive 2000/60/ES.
Decision No 2455/2001/EC sets out the first list of 33 substances or groups of substances that have been prioritised for action at Community level.
Odločba št. 2455/2001/ES določa prvi seznam 33 snovi ali skupin snovi, glede katerih je treba na ravni Skupnosti prednostno ukrepati.
Among those priority substances, certain substances have been identified as priority hazardous substances for which Member States should implement necessary measures with the aim of ceasing or phasing out emissions, discharges and losses.
Med temi prednostnimi snovmi so bile nekatere opredeljene kot prednostne nevarne snovi, v zvezi s katerimi bi morale države članice izvajati potrebne ukrepe, da se ustavijo ali postopno odpravijo emisije, izpuste in uhajanje.
For substances occurring naturally or through natural processes, the cessation or phasing-out of emissions, discharges and losses from all potential sources is impossible.
Za snovi, ki so že v naravi ali so posledica naravnih procesov, pa popolna ustavitev ali postopna odprava emisij, izpustov in uhajanj iz vseh morebitnih virov ni možna.
Some substances have been under review and should be classified.
Nekatere snovi so bile pregledane in bi jih bilo treba razvrstiti.
The Commission should continue to review the list of priority substances, prioritising substances for action on the basis of agreed criteria that demonstrate the risk to, or via, the aquatic environment, in accordance with the timetable provided for in Article 16 of Directive 2000/60/EC, and bring forward proposals as appropriate.
Komisija bi morala v skladu s časovnim razporedom iz člena 16 Direktive 2000/60/ES nadaljevati s pregledom seznama prednostnih snovi in na podlagi dogovorjenih meril, ki prikazujejo tveganje za vodno okolje ali tveganje preko vodnega okolja, določiti snovi, glede katerih bi bilo treba prednostno ukrepati, ter po potrebi predstaviti ustrezne predloge.
In the interests of the Community and for a more effective regulation of surface water protection, it is appropriate to set up EQS for pollutants classified as priority substances at Community level and to leave it to Member States to lay down, where necessary, rules for remaining pollutants at national level, subject to the application of relevant Community rules.
V interesu Skupnosti in za učinkovitejše urejanje varstva površinskih voda je primerno določiti OSK za onesnaževala, opredeljena kot prednostne snovi, na ravni Skupnosti in prepustiti državam članicam, da po potrebi določijo pravila za preostala onesnaževala na nacionalni ravni, ob upoštevanju ustreznih predpisov Skupnosti.
None the less, eight pollutants which fall under the scope of Council Directive 86/280/EEC of 12 June 1986 on limit values and quality objectives for discharges of certain dangerous substances included in List I of the Annex to Directive 76/464/EEC [6], and which form part of the group of substances for which Member States should implement measures with the aim of achieving good chemical status by 2015, subject to Articles 2 and 4 of Directive 2000/60/EC, were not included in the list of priority substances.
Vendar pa osem onesnaževal, ki spadajo v področje uporabe Direktive Sveta 86/280/EGS z dne 12. junija 1986 o mejnih vrednostih in ciljih kakovosti pri odvajanju določenih nevarnih snovi, vključenih v seznam I Priloge k Direktivi 76/464/EGS [6] in so del skupine snovi, v zvezi s katerimi bi morale države članice izvajati ukrepe z namenom, da se doseže dobro kemijsko stanje do leta 2015, ob upoštevanju členov 2 in 4 Direktive 2000/60/ES, ni bilo vključenih na seznam prednostih snovi.
However, the common standards established for those pollutants proved to be useful and it is therefore appropriate to maintain their regulation at Community level.
Vendar so se skupni standardi, določeni za ta onesnaževala, izkazali kot koristni, zato je primerno, da se njihovo urejanje ohrani na ravni Skupnosti.
Consequently, the provisions concerning current environmental quality objectives laid down in Council Directive 82/176/EEC of 22 March 1982 on limit values and quality objectives for mercury discharges by the chlor-alkali electrolysis industry [7], Council Directive 83/513/EEC of 26 September 1983 on limit values and quality objectives for cadmium discharges [8], Council Directive 84/156/EEC of 8 March 1984 on limit values and quality objectives for mercury discharges by sectors other than the chlor-alkali electrolysis industry [9], Council Directive 84/491/EEC of 9 October 1984 on limit values and quality objectives for discharges of hexachlorocyclohexane [10] and Directive 86/280/EEC will become superfluous and should be deleted.
Zaradi tega določbe v zvezi s sedanjimi okoljskimi cilji kakovosti iz Direktive Sveta 82/176/EGS z dne 22. marca 1982 o mejnih vrednostih in ciljih kakovosti pri odvajanju živega srebra v industriji, ki uporablja kloralkalno elektrolizo [7], Direktive Sveta 83/513/EGS z dne 26. septembra 1983 o mejnih vrednostih in ciljih kakovosti v zvezi z izpustom kadmija [8], Direktive Sveta 84/156/EGS z dne 8. marca 1984 o mejnih vrednostih in zahtevah glede kakovosti pri odvajanju živega srebra v industriji, ki ne uporablja kloralkalne elektrolize [9], Direktive Sveta 84/491/EGS z dne 9. oktobra 1984 o mejnih vrednostih in ciljih kakovosti pri odvajanju heksaklorocikloheksana [10] in Direktive 86/280/EGS ne bodo več potrebne in bi jih bilo treba črtati.
The aquatic environment can be affected by chemical pollution both in the short- and long- term, and therefore both acute and chronic effects data should be used as the basis for establishing the EQS.
Kemijsko onesnaženje lahko vpliva na vodno okolje tako kratkotrajno kot dolgotrajno, zato bi bilo treba OSK določati na podlagi podatkov o akutnih, pa tudi kroničnih posledicah.
In order to ensure that the aquatic environment and human health are adequately protected, EQS expressed as an annual average value should be established at a level providing protection against long-term exposure, and maximum allowable concentrations should be established to protect against short-term exposure.
Za zagotovitev ustreznega varstva vodnega okolja in zdravja ljudi bi bilo treba določiti OSK kot letne povprečne vrednosti na ravni, ki zagotavlja varstvo pred dolgoročno izpostavljenostjo, in največje dovoljene koncentracije za varstvo pred kratkotrajno izpostavljenostjo.
In accordance with the rules set out in section 1.3.4 of Annex V to Directive 2000/60/EC, when monitoring compliance with the EQS, including those expressed as maximum allowable concentrations, Member States may introduce statistical methods, such as a percentile calculation, to deal with outliers, that is extreme deviations from the mean, and false readings in order to ensure an acceptable level of confidence and precision.
Države članice lahko v skladu s pravili iz oddelka 1.3.4 Priloge V k Direktivi 2000/60/ES v zvezi s spremljanjem skladnosti z OSK, vključno s tistimi, ki so izraženi z največjo dovoljeno koncentracijo, za obravnavo ubežnikov, t.j. skrajna odstopanja od povprečja, in napačnih odčitavanj uvedejo statistične metode, kot je izračun percentilov, da se zagotovi sprejemljiva raven zaupanja in natančnosti.
To ensure the comparability of monitoring between Member States, it is appropriate to provide for the establishment of detailed rules for such statistical methods through a committee procedure.
Za zagotovitev primerljivosti spremljanja stanja med državami članicami je primerno, da se s pomočjo postopka komitologije določijo podrobna pravila za takšne statistične metode.
For the majority of substances the establishment of EQS values at Community level should, at this stage, be limited to surface water only.
Na tej stopnji bi bilo treba vrednosti OSK na ravni Skupnosti za večino snovi uvesti zgolj za površinske vode.
However, as regards hexachlorobenzene, hexachlorobutadiene and mercury, it is not possible to ensure protection against indirect effects and secondary poisoning at Community level by EQS for surface water alone.
Vendar pri heksaklorobenzenu, heksaklorobutadienu in živem srebru ni mogoče zagotoviti varstva pred posrednimi učinki in sekundarnim zastrupljanjem na ravni Skupnosti zgolj z določitvijo OSK za površinske vode.
It is therefore appropriate to establish EQS for biota at Community level for those three substances.
Za te tri snovi bi bilo zato primerno na ravni Skupnosti določiti OSK za žive organizme.
In order to allow Member States flexibility depending on their monitoring strategy, Member States should be able either to monitor and apply those EQS for biota, or to establish stricter EQS for surface water providing the same level of protection.
Da bi se državam članicam omogočila prilagodljivost glede na njihovo strategijo spremljanja stanja, bi morale države članice imeti možnost, da bodisi spremljajo in uporabljajo te OSK za žive organizme ali določijo strožje OSK za površinske vode, ki zagotavljajo enako raven varstva.
Furthermore, Member States should be able to establish EQS for sediment and/or biota at national level and apply those EQS instead of the EQS for water set out in this Directive.
Države članice bi poleg tega morale imeti možnost, da na nacionalni ravni določijo OSK za sedimente in/ali žive organizme in jih uporabljajo namesto OSK za vodo, določenih v tej direktivi.
Such EQS should be established through a transparent procedure involving notifications to the Commission and other Member States so as to ensure a level of protection equivalent to the EQS for water set up at Community level.
Te OSK bi bilo treba določiti s preglednim postopkom, ki vključuje obveščanje Komisije in drugih držav članic, da se zagotovi enaka raven varstva, kot jo zagotavljajo OSK za vodo, vzpostavljeni na ravni Skupnosti.
The Commission should summarise these notifications in its reports on the implementation of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Komisija bi morala povzeti ta obvestila v svojem poročilu o izvajanju Direktive 2000/60/ES.
Moreover, sediment and biota remain important matrices for the monitoring of certain substances with significant accumulation potential.
Sedimenti in živi organizmi so pomemben medij za spremljanje nekaterih snovi s pomembnim akumulacijskim potencialom.
In order to assess long-term impacts of anthropogenic activity and trends, Member States should take measures, subject to Article 4 of Directive 2000/60/EC, with the aim of ensuring that existing levels of contamination in biota and sediments will not significantly increase.
Države članice bi morale, zato da bi ocenile trende in dolgoročne vplive antropogene dejavnosti, sprejeti ukrepe v skladu s členom 4 Direktive 2000/60/ES s ciljem zagotoviti, da se sedanje ravni onesnaženja v živih organizmih in sedimentih ne bodo znatno povečale.
In accordance with Article 13 of, and Annex VII(A)(5) to, Directive 2000/60/EC, any exemptions to the application of the EQS for priority substances applied to water bodies in accordance with Article 4(4), (5) and (6) of that Directive, taking into account Article 4(8) and (9) thereof, should be reported in the river basin management plans.
V skladu s členom 13 in Prilogo VII(A)(5) Direktive 2000/60/ES bi bilo treba o vseh izjemah pri izvajanju okoljskih standardov kakovosti za prednostne snovi, ki se uporabljajo za vodna telesa v skladu s členom 4(4), (5) in (6) navedene direktive, ob upoštevanju člena 4(8) in (9) Direktive, poročati v načrtih upravljanja voda.
Provided that the requirements of Article 4 of Directive 2000/60/EC including conditions for exemptions are met, activities, including dredging and shipping, leading to discharges, emissions and losses of priority substances can take place.
Če so izpolnjene zahteve, tudi pogoji za izjeme, iz člena 4 Direktive 2000/60/ES, se dejavnosti, vključno z izkopavanjem in ladijskim prometom, zaradi katerih pride do izpustov, emisij in uhajanj prednostnih snovi, lahko izvajajo.
Member States have to comply with Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption [11] and manage the surface water bodies used for abstraction of drinking water in accordance with Article 7 of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Države članice morajo ravnati v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 98/83/ES z dne 3. novembra 1998 o kakovosti vode, namenjene za prehrano ljudi [11], in upravljati vodna telesa površinske vode, namenjena za odvzem pitne vode, v skladu s členom 7 Direktive 2000/60/ES.
This Directive should therefore be implemented without prejudice to those requirements which may require more stringent standards.
To direktivo bi bilo torej treba izvajati brez poseganja v zahteve, ki morebiti zahtevajo strožje standarde.
In the vicinity of discharges from point sources, concentrations of pollutants are usually higher than the ambient concentrations in water.
V bližini izpustov iz točkovnih virov so koncentracije onesnaževal ponavadi večje kot okoliške koncentracije v vodi.
Therefore, Member States should be able to make use of mixing zones, so long as they do not affect the compliance of the rest of the body of surface water with the relevant EQS.
Zato bi bilo treba državam članicam omogočiti uporabo območij mešanja, v kolikor ne vplivajo na skladnost preostalega telesa površinske vode z ustreznimi OSK.
The extent of mixing zones should be restricted to the proximity of the point of discharge and should be proportionate.
Obseg območij mešanja bi moral biti omejen na bližino mesta izpustov in sorazmeren.
In accordance with Article 3(4) of Directive 2000/60/EC, Member States should ensure, as appropriate, that the requirements for the achievement of the environmental objectives set out in Article 4 of that Directive are coordinated for the whole of the river basin district, including the designation of mixing zones in transboundary water bodies.
V skladu s členom 3(4) Direktive 2000/60/ES morajo države članice po potrebi zagotoviti, da so zahteve za doseganje okoljskih ciljev, določene v členu 4 navedene direktive, usklajene na celem vodnem območju, vključno z določitvijo območij mešanja v čezmejnih vodnih telesih.
It is necessary to check compliance with the objectives for cessation or phase-out, and reduction, as specified in Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 2000/60/EC, and to make the assessment of compliance with these obligations transparent, in particular as regards the consideration of significant emissions, discharges and losses as a result of human activities.
Treba je preverjati doseganje ciljev za ustavitev ali postopno odpravo in zmanjšanje iz člena 4(1)(a) Direktive 2000/60/ES ter zagotoviti preglednost presoje doseganja teh obveznosti, zlasti glede obravnave pomembnih emisij, izpustov in uhajanj kot rezultatov človekove dejavnosti.
Further, a timetable for cessation or phase-out, and reduction, can only be related to an inventory.
Nadalje je časovni načrt za ustavitev ali postopno odpravo in zmanjšanje lahko povezan le s popisom.
It should also be possible to assess the application of Article 4(4) to (7) of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Omogočiti bi bilo treba tudi oceno uporabe člena 4(4) do (7) Direktive 2000/60/ES.
An appropriate tool is likewise needed for the quantification of losses of substances occurring naturally, or resulting from natural processes, in which case complete cessation or phase-out from all potential sources is impossible.
Prav tako je potrebno tudi ustrezno sredstvo za merjenje uhajanj snovi, ki so že v naravi ali so posledica naravnih procesov, kjer popolna ustavitev ali postopna odprava iz vseh morebitnih virov ni možna.
In order to meet those needs, each Member State should establish an inventory of emissions, discharges and losses for each river basin district or part of a river basin district in its territory.
Za izpolnitev teh zahtev bi morala vsaka država članica pripraviti popis emisij, izpustov in uhajanj za vsako vodno območje ali del vodnega območja na svojem ozemlju.
In order to avoid duplication of work by establishing those inventories and to ensure the coherence of those inventories with other existing tools in the area of surface water protection, Member States should use information collected under Directive 2000/60/EC and under Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 of the European Parliament and Council of 18 January 2006 concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register [12].
Da bi se pri pripravi teh popisov izognile podvajanju dela in zagotovile njihovo skladnost z drugimi obstoječimi instrumenti na področju varstva površinskih voda, bi morale države članice uporabiti podatke, zbrane na podlagi Direktive 2000/60/ES in Uredbe (ES) št. 166/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. januarja 2006 o Evropskem registru izpustov in prenosov onesnaževal [12].
In order to ensure consistent protection of surface water, Member States sharing bodies of surface water should coordinate their monitoring activities and, as appropriate, the compilation of inventories.
Da bi zagotovile skladno varstvo površinskih voda, bi morale države članice, ki si delijo vodna telesa površinske vode, uskladiti dejavnosti spremljanja in po potrebi pripravo popisov.
In order better to reflect their needs, Member States should be able to choose an appropriate one-year reference period for measuring the basic entries of the inventory.
Da bi bolje odražale svoje potrebe, bi morale imeti države članice za merjenje osnovnih vnosov popisa možnost izbire ustreznega enoletnega referenčnega obdobja.
However, account should be taken of the fact that the losses from the application of pesticides may vary considerably from one year to another because of different application rates, for instance as a result of different climatic conditions.
Treba pa bi bilo upoštevati dejstvo, da se lahko uhajanja ob uporabi pesticidov iz leta v leto močno razlikujejo zaradi različnih stopenj uporabe, na primer zaradi različnih podnebnih razmer.
Therefore, Member States should be able to opt for a three-year reference period for certain substances covered by Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market [13].
Zato bi moralo biti državam članicam omogočeno, da se pri nekaterih snoveh, ki jih zajema Direktiva Sveta 91/414/EGS z dne 15. julija 1991 o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet [13], odločijo za triletno referenčno obdobje.
In order to optimise the use of the inventory, it is appropriate to fix a deadline for the Commission to verify that emissions, discharges and losses are making progress towards compliance with the objectives set out in Article 4(1)(a) of Directive 2000/60/EC, subject to Article 4(4) and (5) of that Directive.
Da bi optimizirali uporabo popisa, je primerno določiti rok, v katerem Komisija preveri, ali se emisije, izpusti in uhajanje približujejo doseganju ciljev iz člena 4(1)(a) Direktive 2000/60/ES, ob upoštevanju člena 4(4) in (5) navedene direktive.
Technical guidelines should be developed to contribute to the harmonisation of methodologies used by Member States to establish the inventories of emissions, discharges and losses, including losses from pollution accumulated in sediments.
Treba bi bilo razviti tehnične smernice, ki bodo v pomoč pri usklajevanju metodologij, ki jih uporabljajo države članice za pripravo popisov emisij, izpustov in uhajanja, vključno z uhajanjem onesnaževanja, nakopičenega v sedimentih.
Several Member States are affected by pollution the source of which lies outside their national jurisdiction.
Več držav članic je prizadetih zaradi onesnaževanja iz vira, ki leži izven njihove nacionalne pristojnosti.
It is therefore appropriate to make clear that a Member State would not be in breach of its obligations under this Directive as a result of the exceeding of an EQS due to such transboundary pollution, provided that certain conditions were met and that it had taken advantage, as appropriate, of the relevant provisions of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Zato je primerno izrecno navesti, da država članica zaradi prekoračitve OSK kot posledice čezmejnega onesnaževanja ne krši obveznosti iz te direktive, če so bili izpolnjeni določeni pogoji in če je, kjer je to primerno, uporabila ustrezne določbe Direktive 2000/60/ES.
On the basis of reports from Member States, in accordance with Article 15 of Directive 2000/60/EC, the Commission should review the need to amend existing acts and the need for additional specific Community-wide measures, such as emission controls, and, if appropriate, make relevant proposals.
Na podlagi poročil držav članic v skladu s členom 15 Direktive 2000/60/ES bi morala Komisija preveriti, ali obstaja potreba po spremembi obstoječih aktov in potreba po dodatnih specifičnih ukrepih na ravni Skupnosti, na primer nadzor nad emisijami, in po potrebi predložiti ustrezne predloge.
The Commission should report the conclusions of this review to the European Parliament and to the Council in the context of the report under Article 18(1) of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Komisija bi morala ugotovitve, ki iz pregleda izhajajo, sporočiti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu v okviru poročila, pripravljenega v skladu s členom 18(1) Direktive 2000/60/ES.
In making any proposals for emission control measures, having regard to Article 10 of Directive 2000/60/EC, the Commission should take into account existing emission control requirements, such as those under Directive 2008/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control [14], and the latest developments on pollution abatement technology.
Pri predlogih za ukrepe za nadzor emisij ob upoštevanju člena 10 Direktive 2000/60/ES bi morala Komisija upoštevati obstoječe zahteve za nadzor emisij, na primer zahteve iz Direktive 2008/1/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. januarja 2008 o celovitem preprečevanju in nadzorovanju onesnaževanja [14] in najnovejši razvoj na področju tehnologij za zmanjševanje onesnaževanja.
The criteria for identifying substances that are persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic, as well as substances of other equivalent concern, notably very persistent and very bioaccumulative, as referred to in Directive 2000/60/EC, are established in the Technical Guidance Document for Risk Assessment in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC of 20 July 1993 laying down the principles for assessment of risks to man and the environment of substances notified in accordance with Council Directive 67/548/EEC [15], Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market [16] and Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) and establishing a European Chemicals Agency [17].
Merila za opredelitev snovi, ki so obstojne, bioakumulativne in strupene, kakor tudi za druge enako zaskrbljujoče snovi, zlasti zelo obstojne in močno bioakumulativne, kakor so navedene v Direktivi 2000/60/ES, so določena v Tehničnem navodilu za presojo tveganja v podporo Direktivi Komisije 93/67/EGS z dne 20. julija 1993 o določitvi načel za ocenjevanje tveganja za človeka in okolje v zvezi s snovmi, prijavljenimi v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 67/548/EGS [15], Direktivi 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 1998 o dajanju biocidnih pripravkov v promet [16] in Uredbi (ES) 1907/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o registraciji, evalvaciji, avtorizaciji in omejevanju kemikalij (REACH) in ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za kemikalije [17].