natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As for the last criterion, the importance in the production process of the downstream industry, the exporting producer claimed that KMPS constituted a high percentage of its users' production costs.
Glede zadnjega merila, pomembnosti v proizvodnih postopkih industrije na koncu proizvodne verige, je proizvajalec trdil, da KMPS za svoje uporabnike pomeni visok odstotek njihovih proizvodnih stroškov.
In this respect, it was established during the investigation (recitals 112 to 120 below) that although KMPS constitutes a higher proportion of the cost, the impact on the users' profitability is negligible.
V zvezi s tem je bilo med preiskavo ugotovljeno (uvodne izjave 112 do 120), da čeprav KMPS pomeni visok delež stroškov, je učinek na donosnost uporabnikov zanemarljiv.
In any event, it was considered that this should not prevent the Community institutions from considering KMPS as the product concerned given the abovementioned finding that all product types were interchangeable.
V vsakem primeru pa to institucijam Skupnosti ne bi smelo preprečiti, da KMPS štejejo za zadevni izdelek, glede na zgornje ugotovitve, da so vse vrste izdelka zamenljive.
It is finally noted that none of the other interested Parties, in particular none of the Chinese exporting producers of KMPS, challenged the product definition in the present proceeding or objected to the inclusion of KMPS in the product scope of the present investigation.
Nazadnje je treba opomniti, da nobena od zainteresiranih strank, predvsem noben kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik KMPS, ni izpodbijala opredelitve izdelka v sedanjem postopku ali nasprotovala vključitvi KMPS v obseg izdelka sedanje preiskave.
On the basis of the above, the provisional conclusions set out in recital 17 of the provisional Regulation that all four types should be considered to constitute one single product for the purpose of this proceeding are hereby confirmed.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega se začasne sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 17 začasne uredbe, da je treba v tem postopku vse štiri vrste šteti za en izdelek, potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments concerning the like product, recitals 18 and 19 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s podobnim izdelkom ni bilo pripomb, se uvodni izjavi 18 in 19 začasne uredbe potrdita.
In the absence of any comments with regard to the general methodology, recitals 20 to 39 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker pripomb v zvezi s splošno metodologijo ni bilo, se uvodne izjave od 20 do 39 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Following the provisional disclosure, one exporting producer argued that the deduction made pursuant to Article 2(10)(i) as described in recital 47 of the provisional Regulation led to a double counting of the profit made by its related trader in Switzerland.
Po začasnem razkritju je en proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da je odbitek v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) iz uvodne izjave 47 začasne uredbe povzročil dvojno štetje dobička, ki ga je ustvaril njegov povezan trgovec v Švici.
However, the exporting producer failed to substantiate its claim and upon verification no double counting was found in the calculation.
Vendar proizvajalec izvoznik svoje trditve ni dokazal, s ponovnim preverjanjem pa v izračunu dvojno štetje ni bilo ugotovljeno.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the determination of dumping with regard to the USA, recitals 40 to 50 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene druge pripombe glede ugotovitve dampinga v zvezi z ZDA, se uvodne izjave od 40 do 50 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Two exporting producers which were denied Market Economy Treatment (MET) disputed the Commission's conclusions.
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika, ki jima je bila tržnogospodarska obravnava (TGO) zavrnjena, sta oporekala sklepnim ugotovitvam Komisije.
However, they did not put forward any new arguments and the conclusions made with regard to MET for those two exporting producers in the provisional Regulation have, as a result, remained unchanged.
Vendar nista predložila nobenih novih utemeljitev, zato se sklepne ugotovitve iz začasne uredbe v zvezi s TGO za navedena proizvajalca izvoznika ne spremenijo.
One of those two exporting producers further alleged that, if the decision to reject its MET claim was maintained, it should nevertheless be granted individual treatment (IT).
Poleg tega je eden od navedenih dveh proizvajalcev izvoznikov trdil, da mu je treba, tudi če se sklep o nedodelitvi TGO ne spremeni, odobriti individualno obravnavo („IO“).
However, that exporting producer was not able to demonstrate that its business decisions was taken in response to market signals, without significant State interference, as explained in recital 56 of the provisional Regulation.
Vendar proizvajalec izvoznik ni mogel dokazati, da so bile njegove poslovne odločitve sprejmete kot odziv na tržne razmere in brez večjega vmešavanja države, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 56 začasne uredbe.
For the same reasons it cannot be excluded, and the exporting producer did not prove otherwise, that State interference would permit circumvention of measures if that exporting producer were given an individual rate of duty.
Iz enakih razlogov ni mogoče izključiti, proizvajalec izvoznik pa ni dokazal drugače, da bi vmešavanje države omogočalo izogibanje ukrepom, če se navedenemu proizvajalcu izvozniku določi individualna stopnje dajatve.
It is therefore maintained that IT should be denied to that exporting producer, in accordance with Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se v skladu s členom 9(5) osnovne uredbe sklep o neodobritvi IO temu proizvajalcu izvozniku ne spremeni.
Recital 53 of the provisional Regulation stated that for one of the three exporting producers granted MET, further examination of late information that could not be fully investigated at that stage was necessary.
Uvodna izjava 53 začasne uredbe v zvezi z enim od treh proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki jim je bil TGO odobren, navaja, da je treba proučiti tudi naknadne informacije, ki jih v tej fazi še ni bilo mogoče v celoti pregledati.
The information which had then been received, as well as further information received after the publication of the provisional Regulation, was examined and a verification visit at the premises of the exporting producer was carried out in order to check its validity.
Do tedaj prejete informacije in informacije, ki so bile prejete po objavi začasne uredbe, so bile proučene, v prostorih proizvajalca izvoznika pa je bil zaradi njihove preveritve opravljen preveritveni obisk.
This resulted, based on new information which was brought to light during the latest steps of the investigation, in significant changes in the factual situation on the basis of which the evaluation of criteria 1 and 2 had been made.
Na podlagi novih informacij, ki so bile razkrite med zadnjimi postopki preiskave, je prišlo do znatnih sprememb v dejanskem stanju, na podlagi katerega je bila izvedena ocena meril 1 in 2.
As regards criterion 1, the exporting producer was found to have previously concealed some essential information regarding its current managers and owners, and their role in the company prior to its privatisation.
Glede merila 1 je bilo ugotovljeno, da je proizvajalec izvoznik predhodno prikril nekatere bistvene informacije v zvezi s svojimi sedanjimi upravljavci in lastniki ter njihovo vlogo v družbi pred privatizacijo.
This voluntary omission casts doubts on all the information submitted with regard to privatisation.
Navedena namerna opustitev meče dvom na vse predložene informacije glede privatizacije.
Furthermore, the company could not explain convincingly on which grounds it was granted two loans with a reduced interest rate by a bank controlled by the State, which points to State interference.
Poleg tega družba ni prepričljivo pojasnila, na kakšni podlagi ji je od države nadzorovana banka odobrila dve posojili z zmanjšano obrestno mero, kar kaže na vmešavanje države.
These specific loans had not been investigated initially as they were granted after the end of the IP.
Zadevni posojili prvotno nista bili pregledani, ker sta bili odobreni po koncu OP.
However, this clearly has an impact on the present situation of the company, and it was considered appropriate, in accordance with the case law, to take it into account.
Vendar sta očitno vplivali na sedanje stanje družbe, zato se je v skladu z zadevno sodno prakso zdelo primerno, da se ju upošteva.
For the reasons mentioned above, which are based on information that could not reasonably have been known to the Commission's services at the time of the initial investigation on MET, State interference in the running of the company can no longer be excluded, and the company did not prove otherwise.
Zaradi navedenih razlogov, ki temeljijo na informacijah, ki v prvotni preiskavi o TGO službam Komisije niso mogle biti znane, vmešavanja države v vodenje družbe ni več mogoče izključiti, družba pa ni dokazala drugače.
As to criterion 2, it was found that financial expenses had been understated in the exporting producer's accounts, in breach of general accruals accounting rules and more specifically International Accounting Standard (IAS) No 23.
V zvezi z merilom 2 je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bili začetni finančni stroški v računovodskih izkazih proizvajalca izvoznika podcenjeni, kar pomeni kršitev splošnih pravil o poslovnih dogodkih, predvsem pa mednarodnega računovodskega standarda (MRS) št. 23.
It should be noted that an inaccurate report of the loans held by the company in their MET claim form had seriously impeded the initial examination of this point, and that the discrepancy found could therefore not reasonably have been known to the Commission's services during the prior steps of the proceeding.
Treba je opozoriti, da je napačno poročilo o posojilih družbe v njenem zahtevku za TGO v tej točki resno ogrozilo prvotno preiskavo in da ugotovljena neskladja v začetnih fazah postopka službam Komisije zato niso mogla biti znana.
In view of the above, it has been concluded that this exporting producer's claim for MET should be rejected.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega je bilo sklenjeno, da se zahtevek navedenega proizvajalca izvoznika za TGO zavrne.
The exporting producer concerned has been informed and has been granted an opportunity to comment on these findings.
Zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik je bil o tem obveščen in je imel možnost dati pripombe na te ugotovitve.
As a result, the dumping margin for all exporting producers not granted MET had to be recalculated, following the same methodology as that described in recital 96 of the provisional Regulation.
Zato je bilo treba po enaki metodologiji, kot je opisana v uvodnih izjavah 96 začasne uredbe, ponovno izračunati stopnjo dampinga za vse proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim TGO ni bil odobren.
Finally, one exporting producer which was granted MET submitted two claims with regard to the calculation of its normal value and export prices, which were not found sufficient to justify an adjustment.
En proizvajalec izvoznik, ki mu je bil odobren TGO, je vložil dva zahtevka v zvezi z izračunom svoje normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene, ki pa nista bila dovolj podkrepljena, da bi upravičila prilagoditev.
One further claim by that exporting producer concerning the allocation of certain logistics expenses borne by its related importer on the total company turnover rather than on the turnover of the product concerned, on the grounds that they were linked to a general restructuring which took place in the company during the IP, was considered sufficiently substantiated and was accepted.
Naslednja trditev navedenega proizvajalca izvoznika glede prenosa določenih stroškov logistike njegovega povezanega uvoznika na skupni promet družbe namesto na promet zadevnega izdelka, ker sta povezana s splošnim prestrukturiranjem družbe med OP, je bila podprta z zadostnimi dokazi in je bila sprejeta.
In any event, this exporting producer's dumping margin had to be recalculated, following the corrections made by its related importer in the Community to the transaction-by-transaction listing provided in support of the resale prices for persulphates within the Community.
Vsekakor pa je treba po popravkih v zvezi s seznamom posameznih transakcij, ki jih je njegov povezani uvoznik v Skupnosti predložil v podporo cen pri nadaljnji prodaji persulfata v Skupnosti, stopnjo dampinga proizvajalca izvoznika ponovno izračunati.
Given the above, the dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the CIF import price at the Community border, duty unpaid, are the following:
Ob upoštevanju navedenega so stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek uvozne cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, naslednje:
In the absence of any other comments concerning the determination of dumping with regard to the PRC, the other provisions of recitals 51 to 97 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene druge pripombe glede opredelitve dampinga v zvezi z LRK, se druge uvodne izjave od 51 do 97 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Following the provisional disclosure, the cooperating exporting producer reiterated two claims for adjustments for level of trade and commissions, as already described in recitals 101 and 102 of the provisional Regulation respectively.
Sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik je po začasnem razkritju ponovno vložil dva zahtevka za prilagoditev stopnje trgovine in provizij, kot je že navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 101 in 102 začasne uredbe.
However, the explanations provided by the exporting producer, which were not substantially different from the explanations that had been received earlier in the proceeding, were not found convincing.
Vendar se pojasnila proizvajalca izvoznika niso bistveno razlikovala od predhodno prejetih pojasnil in zato niso bila prepričljiva.
The exporting producer failed in particular to address some of the arguments supporting the decision to reject its claims as disclosed in the provisional Regulation and partly contradicted prior statements made during the verification visit at its premises.
Proizvajalec izvoznik predvsem ni obravnaval nekaterih utemeljitev v podporo sklepu o zavrnitvi njegovih zahtevkov, kot so bile razkrite v začasni uredbi, in je delno nasprotoval izjavam, danim med preveritvenim obiskom v njegovih prostorih.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the determination of dumping with regard to Taiwan, recitals 98 to 105 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene druge pripombe glede opredelitve dampinga v zvezi s Tajvanom, se uvodne izjave od 98 do 105 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One exporting producer in the USA reiterated that the Community producer importing the product concerned from its related company in the PRC should be excluded from the definition of the Community industry.
En proizvajalec izvoznik iz ZDA je ponovno poudaril, da je treba iz opredelitve industrije Skupnosti izključiti proizvajalca Skupnosti, ki zadevni izdelek uvaža od svoje povezane družbe v LRK.
It was claimed that the fact that production is outsourced to a third country concerned by an anti-dumping investigation would be in itself sufficient to conclude that the producer concerned would be shielded from the effects of the dumped imports.
Trdil je, da bi bila že selitev proizvodnje v tretjo državo, ki je v postopku protidampinške preiskave, dovolj za ugotovitev, da je bil zadevni proizvajalec zaščiten pred učinki dampinškega uvoza.
The exporting producer also claimed that the producer concerned behaved differently from an unrelated Community producer, which is in particular shown by its investment activity in the PRC.
Poleg tega je proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da se je zadevni proizvajalec obnašal drugače kot nepovezan uvoznik v Skupnosti, kar potrjuje njegova naložbena dejavnost V LRK.
It is considered that the fact that a Community producer outsourced production is not per se sufficient reason to exclude this producer from the definition of the Community industry.
Šteje se, da selitev proizvodnje proizvajalca Skupnosti sama po sebi še ni zadosten razlog za izključitev navedenega proizvajalca iz opredelitve industrije Skupnosti.
Indeed, it should first be examined whether the Community producer concerned was shielded from the effects of the dumped imports.
Dejansko je treba najprej ugotoviti, ali je bil zadevni proizvajalec Skupnosti zaščiten pred učinki dampinškega uvoza.
In this regard, as mentioned in recital 106 and 151 of the provisional Regulation, it was found that the quantities imported from the related company in the PRC were small and were only made to maintain global customers.
V zvezi s tem je bilo v uvodnih izjavah 106 in 151 začasne uredbe ugotovljeno, da je bila količina, uvožena od povezane družbe v LRK, majhna in je bila opravljena zgolj za ohranitev strank po svetu.
These imports constituted less than 7 % of the total sales of this producer on the Community market.
Zadevni uvoz je znašal manj kot 7 % celotne prodaje navedenega proizvajalca na trgu Skupnosti.
This indicated that the producer in question was committed to the production in the Community and that imports were rather an act of self-defence.
To kaže, da je bil zadevni proizvajalec zavezan proizvodnji v Skupnosti in je bil uvoz bolj dejanje samoobrambe.
As far as the investment by the Community producer in the PRC is concerned, the claimant exporting producer did not explain how these investments had indeed shielded the Community producer from the effects of the dumped imports, as claimed.
Glede naložbe proizvajalca Skupnosti v LRK proizvajalec izvoznik pritožnik ni pojasnil svoje trditve, kako naj bi ta naložba dejansko ščitila proizvajalca Skupnosti pred učinki dampinškega uvoza.
The above arguments had therefore to be rejected.
Zgoraj navede utemeljitve je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
The same exporting producer alleged that one of the main criteria to conclude that the Community producer in question formed part of the Community industry was that the resale prices on the Community market were at a higher level than the import prices from the PRC.
Isti proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da so eno od glavnih meril za ugotovitev, da je zadevni proizvajalec Skupnosti del industrije Skupnosti, cene, ki naj bi bile pri nadaljnji prodaji v Skupnosti višje kot cene uvoza iz LRK.
The exporting producer claimed that resale prices should have been compared to the average import price from all countries concerned, rather than only those from the PRC.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da je treba cene pri nadaljnji prodaji primerjati s povprečno uvozno ceno vseh zadevnih držav in ne samo s tistimi iz LRK.
However the level of the resale prices was only one additional element which had been considered (see also recital 106 of the provisional Regulation).
Vendar je raven cene pri nadaljnji prodaji samo dodatni element, ki je bil upoštevan (glej tudi uvodno izjavo 106 začasne uredbe).
The resale price indicated that the Community producer did not undercut its Chinese competitors, which would have harmed the Community industry.
Cena pri nadaljnji prodaji kaže, da proizvajalec Skupnosti ni nelojalno nižal cen svojih Kitajskih tekmecev, kar bi škodilo industriji Skupnosti.
In the absence of any other comments concerning Community production and Community industry, recital 106 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb v zvezi s proizvodnjo in industrijo Skupnosti, se uvodna izjava 106 začasne uredbe potrdi.
One exporting producer in the USA claimed that its export sales to its related user in the Community should be excluded from the determination of the total consumption in the Community on the basis that these sales were not made to the ‘merchant market’.
En proizvajalec izvoznik v ZDA je zahteval, da se treba njegov izvoz povezanemu uporabniku v Skupnosti izključi iz opredelitve celotne porabe v Skupnosti, ker navedena prodaja ni bila opravljena na „prodajnem trgu“.
Consumption is defined as the total of all imports into the Community from all sources and all sales of the product concerned from the Community industry on the Community market.
Poraba je opredeljena kot celoten uvoz v Skupnost iz vseh virov in vsa prodaja zadevnega izdelka industrije Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti.
The fact that imports are made to related companies in the Community is irrelevant and does not prevent these sales from being taken into consideration when calculating the total Community consumption.
Dejstvo, da so uvoz opravile povezane družbe v Skupnosti ni pomembno in ne preprečuje upoštevanja navedene prodaje pri izračunavanju celotne porabe Skupnosti.
The exporting producer's claim in this respect was therefore rejected.
Trditev proizvajalca izvoznika v zvezi s tem je bila zato zavrnjena.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the Community consumption, recitals 107, 108 and 109 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s porabo Skupnosti ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 107, 108 in 109 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The two exporters in the USA claimed that for the purpose of assessing injury suffered by the Community industry, imports of persulphates originating in the USA should be decumulated.
Dva proizvajalca iz ZDA sta trdila, da je treba za ocenitev škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, uvoz persulfatov iz ZDA dekumulirati.
Both exporting producers submitted that import prices from the USA were at a higher level and showed trends which differed from import prices from the PRC and Taiwan.
Oba proizvajalca izvoznika sta trdila, da so bile uvozne cene iz ZDA na višji stopnji in kažejo drugačne trende kot uvozne cene iz LRK in Tajvana.
This would show that the product exported from the USA was sold under different market conditions.
To bi pomenilo, da je bil izdelek, izvožen iz ZDA, prodan pod drugačnimi tržnimi pogoji.
One of the exporting producers further argued that its sales made to its related user in the Community should be considered separately because they would be made under different market conditions and show different trends.
Poleg tega je en proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da je treba njegovo prodajo povezanemu uporabniku v Skupnosti upoštevati ločeno, ker je bila opravljena pod drugačnimi tržnimi pogoji in kaže drugačne trende.
Thus, this exporting producer alleged that the import volume from the USA to unrelated customers did not increase nor did so only insignificantly.
Tako je ta proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da se obseg uvoza iz ZDA nepovezanim strankam ni povečal, ali pa se je povečal samo neznatno.
Both exporting producers requested that import prices per country concerned be disclosed.
Oba proizvajalca izvoznika sta zahtevala, da je treba razkriti uvozne cene za zadevno državo.
As far as prices are concerned, and as already mentioned in recital 112 of the provisional Regulation, it was found that export prices from the PRC, Taiwan and the USA showed a similar trend (decreasing) during the period considered and were significantly undercutting the Community prices.
V zvezi s cenami, in kot je bilo že navedeno v uvodni izjavi 112 začasne uredbe, je bilo ugotovljeno, da so v obravnavanem obdobju izvozne cene iz LRK, Tajvana in ZDA kazale enak trend (nižanje) ter so znatno nelojalno nižale cene Skupnosti.
It is noted that the provisional conclusions are based on verified actual export data supplied by the cooperating exporting producers.
Opozoriti je treba, da so začasne sklepne ugotovitve utemeljene na preverjenih dejanskih podatkih o izvozu, ki so jih predložili sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki.
These data were considered as the most reliable source of information available.
Zadevni podatki so najzanesljivejši vir informacij, ki so na voljo.
The average import price supplied by the exporting producers had therefore to be rejected.
Povprečno izvozno ceno, ki sta jo predložila proizvajalca izvoznika, je treba zato zavrniti.
The following average import prices have been determined for each country concerned.
Za vsako zadevno državo so bile določene naslednje povprečne uvozne cene.
The table below shows that the import prices from all countries concerned had a similar, i.e. decreasing trend.
Spodnja tabela kaže, da so imele uvozne cene vseh zadevnih držav podoben, padajoč trend.
Average import prices per country concerned
Povprečne uvozne cene za zadevno državo
USA EUR/tonne
ZDA EUR/tono
USA index
indeks ZDA