natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It was found that the 2003 heatwave and the 2005 flooding had virtually no impact on the harvested quantity of sweetcorn on a global, Community industry, level.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da vročinski val iz leta 2003 in poplave iz leta 2005 niso imele dejansko nobenega vpliva na količino požete sladke koruze na skupni ravni industrije Skupnosti.
Indeed, data obtained from the Community producers in the framework of the investigation showed very stable figures for the yields (in tonnes of sweetcorn harvested per hectare) throughout the period considered.
Podatki, pridobljeni od proizvajalcev Skupnosti v okviru preiskave, kažejo na zelo stabilen pridelek (v tonah sladke koruze, požete na hektar) v vsem obravnavanem obdobju.
It is further reminded that the Commission had found, as described under recitals 86 and 87 of the provisional Regulation, that the unit production cost of the Community industry had risen by a mere 5 % over the period 2002 to the IP, mainly on account of the rising steel price (the can being the most important cost element).
Nadalje je treba opozoriti, da je Komisija ugotovila, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 86 in 87 začasne uredbe, da so se proizvodni stroški na enoto industrije Skupnosti od leta 2002 do OP zvišali samo za 5 %, predvsem zaradi višjih cen jekla (pločevinka je najpomembnejši stroškovni element).
On the basis of these elements, claims (i) and (ii) above are rejected.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega se zgornji trditvi (i) in (ii) zavrneta.
It is therefore considered that weather conditions cannot have broken the causal link between the dumped imports and the injury suffered by the Community industry.
Zato se ugotavlja, da vremenske razmere niso mogle pretrgati vzročne zveze med dampinškim uvozom in škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
In the absence of any other comments with respect to causation, recitals 77 to 99 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb v zvezi z vzročno zvezo ni bilo, se uvodne izjave 77 do 99 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of new and substantiated arguments with respect to Community interest, recitals 100 to 118 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo predloženih novih in utemeljenih ugovorov v zvezi interesom Skupnosti, se uvodne izjave 100 do 118 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Several interested parties claimed that: (i) the Commission should clarify further how it had computed the profit that could be achieved in the absence of dumped imports of 14 % as mentioned in recital 121 of the provisional Regulation; and (ii) the aforementioned profit of 14 % was too high.
Več zainteresiranih strank je trdilo: (i) da mora Komisija natančneje pojasniti način izračuna 14-odstotnega dobička, ki bi ga bilo mogoče doseči brez dampinškega uvoza, navedenega v uvodni izjavi 121 začasne uredbe; in (ii) da je ta 14-odstotni dobiček previsok.
With regard to the latter claim, reference was made to recent safeguard and anti-dumping proceedings concerning similarly processed agricultural products such as preserved citrus fruits [7] and frozen strawberries [8], where profit margins of respectively 6,8 % and 6,5 % had been used.
Glede na slednjo trditev se sklicuje na nedavne zaščitne in protidampinške postopke v zvezi s podobnimi predelanimi kmetijskimi proizvodi, kot so konzervirani agrumi [7] in zamrznjene jagode [8], kjer sta bili uporabljeni stopnji dobička 6,8 % oziroma 6,5 %.
In this context, another interested party claimed (iii) that the profit of 14 % was too low, and should rather be set at 17 % to reflect the profitability achieved in 2002 on sales of retailer's brand product.
V tem okviru pa je druga zainteresirana stranka trdila, (iii) da je stopnja dobička 14 % prenizka in da bi morala znašati 17 %, da bi odražala dobičkonosnost, ki je bila leta 2002 dosežena pri prodaji proizvodov z blagovno znamko prodajalca na drobno.
With respect to claims (i) and (iii) above, recital 121 of the provisional Regulation explains that the profit of 21,4 % achieved in 2002 on sales of both own and retailer's brand products had been adjusted to 14 % in order to reflect the difference in the labelling mix of the Community industry compared to that of imports from Thailand.
V zvezi s trditvama (i) in (iii) zgoraj, je v uvodni izjavi 121 začasne uredbe pojasnjeno, da je bil dobiček 21,4 %, ki je bil leta 2002 dosežen tako pri prodaji pod lastno blagovno znamko kot prodaji z blagovno znamko prodajalca na drobno, prilagojen na 14 %, da se upošteva razlika v paleti znamk industrije Skupnosti v primerjavi uvozom iz Tajske.
The Commission observed that, as indicated in recital 66 of the provisional Regulation, the profitability of sales under the retailer's brand channel was of 17,0 % and 11,1 % in 2002 and 2003 respectively, i.e. when the volume of dumped imports was the lowest.
Komisija ugotavlja, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 66 začasne uredbe, da je bila dobičkonosnost prodaje pod blagovno znamko prodajalca na drobno leta 2002 in 2003, tj. v obdobju, ko je bil dampinški uvoz najnižji, 17 % oziroma 11,1 %.
The Commission considered it reasonable to take the average of these two profit rates, which amounts to 14 %.
Komisija meni, da je 14-odstotno povprečje teh dveh stopenj dobička primerno.
With respect to claim (ii) above, it is considered that the profit in the absence of dumped imports must, as much as possible, reflect the actual specificities of the Community industry at stake.
V zvezi s trditvijo (ii) zgoraj se šteje, da mora dobiček, brez dampinškega uvoza, čimbolj odražati dejanske posebnosti zadevne industrije Skupnosti.
Only in the absence of such information can data from other industries which belong to the same broader sector be relevant.
Samo kadar takih informacij ni, se lahko upoštevajo podatki drugih industrij, ki spadajo v isti širši sektor.
This approach, which the Commission applies consistently, was upheld by the Court of First Instance in the EFMA case [9].
Ta način, ki ga Komisija dosledno uporablja, je potrdilo sodišče prve stopnje v zadevi EFMA [9].
Claims (i) (ii) and (iii) are therefore rejected and the finding that a profit of 14 % could be achieved in the absence of dumped imports is confirmed.
Trditve (i), (ii) in (iii) se zato zavrnejo in potrdi se ugotovitev, da bi bilo brez dampinškega uvoza mogoče doseči dobiček v višini 14 %.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Community interest and in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed at the level of the dumping margin found, but should not be higher than the injury margin presented in recital 123 of the provisional Regulation and confirmed in the present Regulation.
Glede na sklepe v zvezi z dampingom, škodo, vzročno zvezo in interesom Skupnosti in v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe je treba uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na stopnji ugotovljene stopnje dampinga, ki pa ne sme biti višja od stopnje škode, navedene v uvodni izjavi 123 začasne uredbe in potrjene v tej uredbi.
Given the high level of cooperation, the duty for the remaining companies, which did not cooperate in the investigation, is set at the level of the highest duty to be imposed on the companies cooperating in the investigation.
Ob upoštevanju visoke stopnje sodelovanja se dajatev za družbe, ki niso sodelovale v preiskavi, določi na ravni najvišje dajatve, uvedene za družbe, ki sodelujejo v preiskavi.
Therefore, the residual duty is set at the rate of 12,9 %.
Zato je preostala dajatev določena na ravni 12,9 %.
I. UNDERTAKINGS
I. ZAVEZE
Subsequent to the imposition of the provisional measures a number of cooperating exporting producers expressed an interest to offer price undertakings.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov so številni sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki izrazili interes za ponudbo cenovnih zavez.
However after the definitive disclosure (save for the two companies mentioned in recital 60), they failed to submit undertaking offers within the time limit foreseen in Article 8(2) of the basic Regulation.
Vendar po dokončnem razkritju (razen dveh družb iz uvodne izjave 60) ponudb niso predložili v roku iz člena 8(2) osnovne uredbe.
A cooperating exporting producer failed to submit a sufficiently substantiated undertaking offer within the deadlines set in Article 8(2) of the basic Regulation.
Izvoznik proizvajalec ni predložil ustrezno utemeljenih zavez v rokih, določenih v členu 8(2) osnovne uredbe.
Consequently no undertaking offer could be accepted by the Commission from this exporting producer.
Komisija zato ni mogla sprejeti nobene ponudbe o zavezi tega proizvajalca izvoznika.
Nevertheless, the Council, in view of the complexity of the issue for the economic operator in question and for other cooperating exporting producers in a similar situation (fragmented industry, exporting producers located in a developing country and often operating both as traders and exporting producers which makes the formulation of an acceptable undertaking offer more complex) as well as the high level of cooperation during the investigation, considers that these exporting producers should exceptionally be allowed to complete their undertaking offers beyond the above mentioned deadline, but within 10 calendar days from entry into force of this Regulation.
Vendar Svet ob upoštevanju zapletenosti vprašanja za zadevnega gospodarskega subjekta in ostale proizvajalce izvoznike, ki so v enakem položaju (razdrobljena dejavnost, proizvajaleci izvozniki imajo sedež v državi v razvoju ter pogosto delujejo kot trgovci in proizvajalci izvozniki, kar dodatno otežuje oblikovanje sprejemljive ponudbe o zavezi) in visoki ravni sodelovanja med preiskavo, meni, da je treba tem proizvajalcem izvoznikom izjemoma dovoliti, da zaključijo svojo ponudbo o zavezi po zgoraj navedenem roku, vendar v desetih koledarskih dneh po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe.
The Commission is allowed to propose an amendment to this Regulation accordingly.
Komisija lahko predlaga ustrezno spremembo k tej uredbi.
Subsequent to the definitive disclosure two cooperating exporting producers offered acceptable price undertakings combined with a quantitative ceiling in accordance with Articles 8(1) and 8(2) of the basic Regulation.
Po dokončnem razkritju sta dva sodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika v skladu s členom 8(1) in 8(2) osnovne uredbe ponudila sprejemljive cenovne zaveze skupaj s količinsko zgornjo mejo.
They have offered to sell the product concerned within the quantitative ceiling at or above price levels which eliminate the injurious effects of dumping.
Ponudila sta, da bosta zadevni proizvod prodajala znotraj količinske meje po ceni, potrebni za odpravo škodljivih posledic dampinga, ali nad njo.
Imports beyond the quantitative ceiling will be subject to anti-dumping duties.
Uvoz, ki preseže zgornjo količinsko mejo, bo predmet protidampinških dajatev.
Furthermore, the sales structure of these companies is such that the Commission considers that the risk of circumventing the agreed undertaking is limited.
Poleg tega imata ti družbi tako prodajno strukturo, da je po mnenju Komisije nevarnost izogibanja dogovorjeni zavezi omejena.
The Commission, by Decision 2007/424/EC [10], accepted the above undertaking offers.
Komisija je s Sklepom 2007/424/ES [10] sprejela zgoraj navedene ponudbe zaveze.
The Decision sets out in more detail the reasons for accepting these undertakings.
V Sklepu so natančneje pojasnjeni razlogi za sprejetje teh zavez.
To further enable the Commission and the customs authorities to effectively monitor the compliance of the companies with the undertakings, when the request for release for free circulation is presented to the relevant customs authority, exemption from the anti-dumping duty is to be conditional on (i) the presentation of an undertaking invoice, which is a commercial invoice containing at least the elements listed and the declaration stipulated in Annex II; (ii) the fact that imported goods are manufactured, shipped and invoiced directly by the said companies to the first independent customer in the Community; and (iii) the fact that the goods declared and presented to customs correspond precisely to the description on the undertaking invoice.
Da bi lahko Komisija in carinski organi še učinkoviteje nadzorovali, ali družbe spoštujejo zaveze, bo oprostitev protidampinške dajatve, kadar je ustreznemu carinskemu organu predložen zahtevek za sprostitev v prosti promet, odvisna od (i) predložitve računa na podlagi zaveze, ki bo vseboval vsaj podatke in izjavo, predvidene v Prilogi II; (ii) uvoženo blago morajo omenjene družbe izdelati, odpraviti in fakturirati neposredno prvi neodvisni stranki v Skupnosti; ter (iii) blago, deklarirano in predloženo carini, mora natančno ustrezati opisu na računu na podlagi zaveze.
Where the above conditions are not met the appropriate anti-dumping duty shall be incurred at the time of acceptance of the declaration for release into free circulation.
Če zgoraj navedeni pogoji niso izpolnjeni, začne v času prejema izjave o sprostitvi v prosti promet veljati ustrezna protidampinška dajatev.
Whenever the Commission withdraws, pursuant to Article 8(9) of the basic Regulation, its acceptance of an undertaking following a breach by referring to particular transactions, and declares the relevant undertaking invoices as invalid, a customs debt shall be incurred at the time of acceptance of the declaration for release into free circulation of these transactions.
Če Komisija v skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne uredbe zaradi kršitev umakne sprejem zaveze in se pri tem sklicuje na konkretne transakcije ter razglasi ustrezne račune na podlagi zaveze za neveljavne, nastane v času sprejema izjave o sprostitvi v prosti promet teh transakcij carinski dolg.
Importers should be aware that a customs debt may be incurred, as a normal trade risk, at the time of acceptance of the declaration for release into free circulation as described in recitals 62 and 63 even if an undertaking offered by the manufacturer from whom they were buying, directly or indirectly, had been accepted by the Commission.
Uvozniki se morajo zavedati, da lahko v času sprejema izjave o sprostitvi v prosti promet carinski dolg nastane kot del običajnega poslovnega tveganja, kot je opisano v uvodnih izjavah 62 in 63, čeprav je Komisija zavezo, ki jo je ponudil proizvajalec, od katerega so neposredno ali posredno kupovali, sprejela.
Pursuant to Article 14(7) of the basic Regulation, customs authorities should inform the Commission immediately whenever indications of a violation of the undertaking are found.
V skladu s členom 14(7) osnovne uredbe morajo carinski organi vedno, kadar so odkrite kršitve zaveze, o tem takoj obvestiti Komisijo.
For the reasons stated above the undertakings offered by the Thai exporting producers are therefore considered acceptable by the Commission and the companies concerned have been informed of the essential facts, considerations and obligations upon which acceptance is based.
Zaveze, ki so jih ponudili tajski proizvajalci izvozniki, je Komisija iz zgoraj navedenih razlogov štela za sprejemljive in je zadevne družbe obvestila o bistvenih dejstvih, premislekih in obveznostih, na podlagi katerih so bile zaveze sprejete.
In the event of a breach or withdrawal of the undertakings, or in case of withdrawal of acceptance of undertaking by the Commission, the anti-dumping duty which has been imposed by the Council, in accordance of Article 9(4) shall automatically apply by means of Article 8(9) of the basic Regulation.
V primeru kršitve ali umika zaveze ali v primeru umika sprejetja zaveze s strani Komisije se v skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne uredbe samodejno uporabi protidampinška dajatev, ki jo je uvedel Svet v skladu s členom 9(4).
In view of the magnitude of the dumping margins found for the exporting producers in Thailand and given the level of the injury caused to the Community industry, it is considered necessary that the amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duty imposed by the provisional Regulation should be definitively collected to the extent of the amount of definitive duties imposed.
Glede na višino stopenj dampinga, ugotovljenih za proizvajalce izvoznike na Tajskem, in glede na stopnjo škode, povzročene industriji Skupnosti, se šteje, da je treba znesek, zavarovan z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo, uvedeno z začasno uredbo, dokončno pobrati v višini zneska dokončno uvedenih dajatev.
These duty rates (as opposed to the countrywide duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of products originating in the country concerned and produced by the companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Te stopnje dajatev (v nasprotju z dajatvijo za celotno državo, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“) se tako uporabljajo izključno za uvoz proizvodov s poreklom iz zadevne države, ki jih proizvajajo družbe, in posamezne navedene pravne osebe.
Imported products produced by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation with its name and address, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and shall be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Uvoženi proizvodi, ki jih proizvaja katera koli druga družba, ki ni posebej navedena z imenom in naslovom v izvedbenem delu te uredbe, vključno s subjekti, povezanimi s tistimi, ki so izrecno navedeni, teh stopenj ne morejo koristiti in za njih velja stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“.
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of sweetcorn (Zea mays var. saccharata) in kernels, prepared or preserved by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen, falling within CN code ex20019030 (TARIC code 2001903010) and sweetcorn (Zea mays var. saccharata) in kernels prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen, other than products of heading 2006, falling within CN code ex20058000 (TARIC code 2005800010), originating in Thailand.
Dokončna protidampinška dajatev se uvede na uvoz sladke koruze (Zea mays var. saccharata) v zrnju, pripravljene ali konzervirane v kisu ali ocetni kislini, nezamrznjene, uvrščene pod oznako KN ex20019030 (oznaka TARIC 2001903010), ter sladke koruze (Zea mays var. saccharata) v zrnju, pripravljene ali konzervirane drugače kot v kisu ali ocetni kislini, nezamrznjene, razen proizvodov iz tarifne številke 2006, uvrščene pod oznako KN ex20058000 (oznaka TARIC 2005800010), s poreklom iz Tajske.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, of the products described in paragraph 1 and produced by the companies below shall be as follows:
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, veljavne za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti pred plačilom dajatve, za proizvode iz odstavka 1, ki jih proizvajajo družbe, navedene v nadaljevanju, je:
Karn Corn Co., Ltd., 68 Moo 7 Tambol Saentor, Thamaka, Kanchanaburi 71130, Thailand
Karn Corn Co., Ltd, 68 Moo 7 Tambol Saentor, Thamaka, Kanchanaburi 71130, Tajska
401/1 Phaholyothin Rd., Lumlookka, Pathumthani 12130, Thailand
Malee Sampran Public Co., Ltd, Abico Bldg 401/1 Phaholyothin Rd, Lumlookka, Pathumthani 12130, Tajska
Floor, Silom Rd., Bangrak, Bangkok 10500, Thailand
Floor, Silom Rd, Bangrak, Bangkok 10500, Tajska
Sun Sweet Co., Ltd., 9 M. 1, Sanpatong, Chiangmai, Thailand 50120
Sun Sweet Co., Ltd, 9 M. 1, Sanpatong, Chiangmai, Tajska 50120
Manufacturers listed in Annex I
Proizvajalci, navedeni v Prilogi I
Notwithstanding the first subparagraph, the definitive anti-dumping duty shall not apply to imports released for free circulation in accordance with Article 2.
Ne glede na prvi pododstavek se dokončna protidampinška dajatev ne uporablja za uvoz, sproščen v prosti promet v skladu s členom 2.
Imports declared for release into free circulation which are invoiced by companies from which undertakings are accepted by the Commission and whose names are listed in the Decision 2007/424/EC, as from time to time amended, shall be exempt from the anti-dumping duty imposed by Article 1, on condition that:
Uvoženo blago, deklarirano za sprostitev v prosti promet in fakturirano v družbah, katerih zaveze je Komisija sprejela in katerih imena so navedena v občasno spremenjenem Sklepu 2007/424/ES, se oprosti protidampinških dajatev, uvedenih na podlagi člena 1, pod pogojem, da:
they are manufactured, shipped and invoiced directly by the said companies to the first independent customer in the Community, and
omenjene družbe to blago izdelajo, odpravijo in fakturirajo neposredno prvi neodvisni stranki v Skupnosti, in
such imports are accompanied by an undertaking invoice which is a commercial invoice containing at least the elements and the declaration stipulated in Annex II of this Regulation, and
to blago spremlja račun na podlagi zaveze, tj. trgovinski račun, ki vsebuje vsaj podatke in izjavo, predvidene v Prilogi II te uredbe, ter
A customs debt shall be incurred at the time of acceptance of the declaration for release into free circulation:
Carinski dolg nastane v času sprejema izjave o sprostitvi v prosti promet:
whenever it is established, in respect of imports described in paragraph 1, that one or more of the conditions listed in that paragraph are not fulfilled, or
če se ugotovi, da glede uvoza, opisanega v odstavku 1, eden ali več pogojev, navedenih v tem odstavku, ni izpolnjenih, ali
when the Commission withdraws its acceptance of the undertaking pursuant to Article 8(9) of the basic Regulation in a regulation or decision which refers to particular transactions and declares the relevant undertaking invoices as invalid.
če Komisija v skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne uredbe sprejem zaveze umakne z uredbo ali sklepom, ki se nanaša na konkretne transakcije, ter ustrezne račune na podlagi zaveze razglasi za neveljavne.
The amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duties pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1888/2006 on imports of sweetcorn (Zea mays var. saccharata) in kernels, prepared or preserved by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen, falling within CN code ex20019030 (TARIC code 2001903010) and sweetcorn (Zea mays var. saccharata) in kernels prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen, other than products of heading 2006, falling within CN code ex20058000 (TARIC code 2005800010), originating in Thailand, shall be definitively collected.
Zneski, zavarovani z začasnimi protidampinškimi dajatvami, uvedenimi z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1888/2006 na uvoz sladke koruze (Zea mays var. saccharata) v zrnju, pripravljene ali konzervirane v kisu ali ocetni kislini, nezamrznjene, uvrščene pod oznako KN ex20019030 (oznaka TARIC 2001903010), ter sladke koruze (Zea mays var. saccharata) v zrnju, pripravljene ali konzervirane drugače kot v kisu ali ocetni kislini, nezamrznjene, razen proizvodov iz tarifne številke 2006, uvrščene pod oznako KN ex20058000 (oznaka TARIC 2005800010), s poreklom iz Tajske, se dokončno poberejo.
The amounts secured in excess of the definitive duties as set out in Article 1(2) shall be released.
Zavarovani zneski, ki presegajo znesek dokončnih dajatev iz člena 1(2), se sprostijo.
Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994.
Sporazum o izvajanju člena VI Splošnega sporazuma o tarifah in trgovini, 1994.
WT/DS184/AB/R, 23.8.2001, United States — Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Products from Japan.
WT/DS184/AB/R, 23.8.2001, Združene države – protidampinški ukrepi na nekatere izdelke vroče valjanega jekla iz Japonske.
Case T-58/99 Mukand and others v. Council (2001) ECR II-2521.
Zadeva T-58/99 Mukand in ostali proti Svetu [2001] Recueil II-2521.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 658/2004 (OJ L 104, 8.4.2004, p. 67) (see recital 115).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 658/2004 (UL L 104, 8.4.2004, str. 67) (glej uvodno izjavo 115).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1551/2006 (OJ L 287, 18.10.2006, p. 3) (see recital 144).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1551/2006 (UL L 287, 18.10.2006, str. 3) (glej uvodno izjavo 144).
Case T-210/95 EFMA v Council, [1999] ECR II-3291 (paragraph 54 et seq.).
Zadeva T-210/95 EFMA proti Svetu, [1999] Recueil II-3291 (odstavek 54 in naslednji odstavki).