natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The reference point is situated in the plane parallel to the longitudinal median plane of the tractor and passing through the centre of the seat, 700 mm vertically above the line of intersection of that plane and the surface of the seat and 270 mm in the direction of the pelvic support from the vertical plane passing through the front edge of the surface of the seat and perpendicular to the longitudinal median plane of the tractor (Figure 1).
Referenčna točka leži na ravnini, ki je vzporedna z vzdolžno simetrijsko ravnino traktorja in poteka skozi središče sedeža, 700 mm navpično nad sečiščem te ravnine in površine sedeža ter je oddaljena v smeri proti medenični opori 270 mm od navpične ravnine, ki poteka skozi prednji rob površine sedeža in je pravokotna na vzdolžno simetrijsko ravnino traktorja (slika 1).
The reference point thus determined relates to the seat when unoccupied and fitted in the central position specified by the tractor manufacturer.
Tako določena referenčna točka se nanaša na sedež, ko ni zaseden in je nameščen v središčnem položaju, kakor ga je določil proizvajalec traktorja.
Semi-circle of vision
Polkrog vidnega polja
‘Semi-circle of vision’ means the semi-circle described by a radius of 12 m about a point situated in the horizontal plane of the road vertically below the reference point, in such a way that, when facing the direction of motion, the arc of the semi-circle lies in front of the tractor, while the diameter bounding the semi-circle is at right angles to the longitudinal axis of the tractor (Figure 2).
„Polkrog vidnega polja“ pomeni polkrog, ki ga lok polmera 12 m oriše okrog točke, ki leži na vodoravni ravnini ceste navpično pod referenčno točko, tako da je lok polkroga, ko je obrnjen v smer premikanja, pred traktorjem, medtem ko je premer, ki povezuje polkrog, pravokoten na vzdolžno os traktorja (slika 2).
Masking effect
Učinek zakrivanja
‘Masking effect’ means the chords of the sectors of the semi-circle of vision which cannot be seen owing to structural components such as roof-pillars, air intakes or exhaust stacks and the frame of the windscreen.
„Zakritje“ pomeni tetive odsekov polkroga vidnega polja, ki jih ni mogoče videti zaradi delov konstrukcije, kot so stebrički strehe, zračne odprtine ali izpušne cevi in okvir vetrobranskega stekla.
Sector of vision
Odsek vidnega polja
‘Sector of vision’ means that part of the field of vision bounded:
„Odsek vidnega polja“ pomeni tisti del vidnega polja, ki je omejen:
at the top,
zgoraj
by a horizontal plane passing through the reference point;
z vodoravno ravnino, ki teče skozi referenčno točko;
in the plane of the road,
na ravnini ceste
by the zone lying outside the semi-circle of vision, and forming the continuation of the sector of the semi-circle of vision, the chord of which is 9,5 m long, perpendicular to the plane parallel to the longitudinal median plane of the tractor passing through the centre of the driver's seat and bisected by that plane.
z območjem, ki leži zunaj polkroga vidnega polja in pomeni nadaljevanje odseka polkroga vidnega polja, katerega tetiva je dolga 9,5 m in pravokotna na ravnino, vzporedno z vzdolžno simetrijsko ravnino traktorja, ki poteka skozi središče voznikovega sedeža in jo ta ravnina razpolavlja.
Swept area of the windscreen wipers
Območje brisanja brisalcev vetrobranskega stekla
‘Swept area of the windscreen wipers’ means the area of the outer surface of the windscreen swept by the windscreen wipers.
„Območje brisanja brisalcev vetrobranskega stekla“ pomeni zunanjo površino vetrobranskega stekla, ki jo brišejo brisalci vetrobranskega stekla.
The tractor shall be constructed and equipped in such a way that, in road traffic and in farm and forest use, the driver has an adequate field of vision, under all the usual conditions pertaining to highway use and to work undertaken in fields and forests.
Traktorji so izdelani in opremljeni tako, da je vidno polje voznika v cestnem prometu ter pri delu na polju in v gozdu ustrezno v vseh običajnih razmerah, kot je vožnja po cesti ter delo na poljih in v gozdovih.
The field of vision is considered adequate when the driver has, as far as possible, a view of part of each front wheel and when the following requirements are fulfilled.
Vidno polje je ustrezno, kadar ima voznik, kolikor je le mogoče, pogled na del vsakega od obeh prednjih koles in kadar so izpolnjene naslednje zahteve.
Checking of the field of vision
Preverjanje vidnega polja
Procedure for determining masking effects
Postopek za določanje učinkov zakrivanja
The tractor must be placed on a horizontal surface as shown in Figure 2.
Traktor mora biti nameščen na vodoravno površino tako, kakor kaže slika 2.
On a horizontal support level with the reference point, there must be mounted two point sources of light, e.g. 2 × 150 W, 12 V, 65 mm apart and symmetrically located with respect to the reference point.
Na vodoravnem nosilcu morata biti dva točkovna vira svetlobe v višini referenčne točke, npr. 2 × 150 W, 12 V, ki sta 65 mm narazen in simetrično nameščena glede na referenčno točko.
The support must be rotatable at its centre point about a vertical axis passing through the reference point.
Nosilec mora biti vrtljiv v svoji središčni točki okrog navpične osi, ki poteka skozi referenčno točko.
For the purpose of measuring the masking effects, the support must be so aligned that the line joining the two light sources is perpendicular to the line joining the masking component and the reference point.
Za merjenje učinkov zakritja mora biti nosilec postavljen tako, da je linija, ki povezuje svetlobna vira, pravokotna na linijo, ki povezuje zakrivajoči sestavni del in referenčno točko.
The silhouette (deepest shadow) overlaps projected on to the semi-circle of vision by the masking component when the light sources are switched on simultaneously or alternately must be measured in accordance with point 1.4 (Figure 3).
Prekrite dele obrisov (najgloblja senca), ki jih zakrivajoči sestavni del projicira na polkrog vidnega polja, ko sta svetlobna vira vključena sočasno ali izmenično, je treba izmeriti v skladu s točko 1.4. (slika 3).
Masking effects must not exceed 700 mm.
Zakritja ne smejo presegati 700 mm.
Masking effects due to adjacent structural components over 80 mm in width must be so configured that there is an interval of not less than 2200 mm — measured as a chord of the semi-circle of vision — between the centres of two masking effects.
Zakritja zaradi bližnjih delov konstrukcije, ki so širši od 80 mm, morajo biti razporejena tako, da je med središči dveh zakritij presledek, ki ni manjši od 2200 mm, merjeno kot tetiva polkroga vidnega polja.
There may be no more than six masking effects in the semi-circle of vision and no more than two inside the sector of vision defined in point 1.5.
V polkrogu vidnega polja ne sme biti več kot šest zakritij, v odseku vidnega polja, opredeljenem v točki 1.5, pa sta lahko največ dva.
Outside the sector of vision, masking effects exceeding 700 mm but not exceeding 1500 mm are, however, permissible if the components causing them cannot be redesigned or relocated: on each side there may be a total of either two such masking effects, one not exceeding 700 mm and the other not exceeding 1500 mm, or two such masking effects, neither exceeding 1200 mm.
Izven odseka vidnega polja so zakritja, večja od 700 mm in ne večja od 1500 mm, dovoljena, če sestavnih delov, ki jih povzročajo, ni mogoče preoblikovati ali premestiti; na vsaki strani sta lahko največ dve takšni zakritji, eno ni večje od 700 mm in drugo od 1500 mm, ali dve takšni zakritji, pri čemer nobeno ni večje od 1200 mm.
Blind spots caused by type-approved rear-view mirrors may be disregarded if the design of these mirrors is such that they cannot be installed in any other way.
Slepe točke, ki jih povzročijo homologirana vzvratna ogledala, se lahko zanemarijo, če je konstrukcija teh ogledal takšna, da jih nikakor ni mogoče namestiti drugače.
Mathematical determination of masking effects for binocular vision:
Matematična določitev zakritja za binokularen pogled:
as an alternative to the procedure set out in point 2.2.1, the acceptability of individual masking effects can be determined mathematically.
alternativno postopku, opredeljenem v točki 2.2.1, je sprejemljivost posameznih zakritij mogoče določiti matematično.
The requirements of points 2.2.1.2 to 2.2.1.6 shall apply in respect of the size, distribution and number of the masking effects;
Glede velikosti, razporeditve in števila zakritij veljajo zahteve točk 2.2.1.2 do 2.2.1.6;
for binocular vision with an inter-ocular distance of 65 mm, the masking effect expressed in mm is given by the formula:
za binokularen pogled z medočesno razdaljo 65 mm je v mm izraženo zakritje navedeno s formulo:
in which:
kjer je:
a is the distance in millimetres between the component obstructing vision and the reference point measured along the visual radius joining the reference point, the centre of the component and the perimeter of the semi-circle of vision; and
a v milimetrih izražena razdalja med sestavnim delom, ki ovira pogled, in referenčno točko, merjena vzdolž vizualnega polmera, ki povezuje referenčno točko, središče sestavnega dela in obod polkroga vidnega polja; in
b is the width in millimetres of the component obstructing vision measured horizontally and perpendicular to the visual radius.
b v milimetrih izražena širina sestavnega dela, ki ovira pogled, merjena vodoravno in pravokotno na vizualni polmer.
The test methods referred to under point 2.2 may be replaced by others if the latter can be shown to be equivalent.
Preskusne metode iz točke 2.2 je mogoče nadomestiti z drugimi, če je mogoče dokazati, da so te enako ustrezne.
Transparent area of the windscreen
Prozorno območje vetrobranskega stekla
For the purpose of determining the masking effects in the sector of vision, the masking effects due to the frame of the windscreen and to any other obstacle may, in accordance with the provisions of point 2.2.1.4, be considered as a single effect, provided that the distance between the outermost points of this masking effect does not exceed 700 mm.
Za določanje zakritij v odseku vidnega polja lahko zakritja zaradi okvira vetrobranskega stekla in katere koli druge ovire v skladu z določbami točke 2.2.1.4 veljajo kot eno samo zakritje, če razdalja med skrajnimi zunanjimi točkami tega zakritja ne presega 700 mm.
Windscreen wipers
Brisalci vetrobranskega stekla
Tractors fitted with windscreens must also be equipped with motor-driven windscreen wipers.
Traktorji, ki imajo vetrobransko steklo, morajo biti opremljeni tudi z brisalci vetrobranskega stekla na motorni pogon.
The area swept by these wipers must ensure an unobstructed forward view corresponding to a chord of the semi-circle of vision at least 8 m long within the sector of vision.
Območje, ki ga ti brisalci obrišejo, mora zagotavljati neoviran pogled naprej, ki ustreza tetivi polkroga vidnega polja, ki je dolga vsaj 8 m znotraj odseka vidnega polja.
The rate of operation of the windscreen wipers must be at least 20 cycles per minute.
Povprečna hitrost delovanja brisalcev vetrobranskega stekla mora biti vsaj 20 ciklov na minuto.
Repealed Directive with its successive amendments (referred to in Article 6)
Razveljavljena direktiva z njenimi zaporednimi spremembami (iz člena 6)
Council Directive 74/347/EEC
Direktiva Sveta 74/347/EGS
(OJ L 191, 15.7.1974, p. 5)
(UL L 191, 15.7.1974, str. 5)
Commission Directive 79/1073/EEC
Direktiva Komisije 79/1073/EGS
(OJ L 331, 27.12.1979, p. 20)
(UL L 331, 27.12.1979, str. 20)
Council Directive 82/890/EEC
Direktiva Sveta 82/890/EGS
(OJ L 378, 31.12.1982, p. 45)
(UL L 378, 31.12.1982, str. 45)
Only as regards the references to Directive 74/347/EEC in Article 1(1)
Samo kar zadeva sklicevanje na Direktivo 74/347/EGS v členu 1(1)
Directive 97/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 97/54/ES
(OJ L 277, 10.10.1997, p. 24)
(UL L 277, 10.10.1997, str. 24)
Only as regards the references to Directive 74/347/EEC in the first indent of Article 1
Samo kar zadeva sklicevanje na Direktivo 74/347/EGS v prvi alinei člena 1
List of time-limits for transposition into national law and application (referred to in Article 6)
Roki za prenos v nacionalno pravo in začetek uporabe (iz člena 6)
74/347/EEC
74/347/EGS
2 January 1976 [1]
januarja 1976 [1]
79/1073/EEC
79/1073/EGS
30 April 1980
aprila 1980
82/890/EEC
82/890/EGS
22 June 1984
junija 1984
In compliance with Article 3a, inserted by point 2 of Article 1 of Directive 79/1073/EEC:‘1.
V skladu s členom 3a, vstavljenem s točko 2 člena 1 Direktive 79/1073/EGS:„1.
With effect from 1 May 1980 no Member State may, on grounds relating to the field of vision of tractors:refuse, in respect of a type of tractor, to grant EEC type-approval, to issue the document referred to in the last indent of Article 10(1) of Directive 74/150/EEC, or to grant national type-approval,or prohibit the entry into service of tractors,if the field of vision of this type of tractor or of these tractors complies with the provisions of this Directive.2.
Nobena država članica ne sme zaradi razlogov, ki se nanašajo na vidno polje traktorjev, od 1. maja 1980 dalje:zavrniti, glede na tip traktorja, podelitve EGS-homologacije, izdaje dokumenta iz zadnje alinee člena 10(1) Direktive 74/150/EGS, ali podelitve nacionalne homologacije,ali prepovedati začetka uporabe traktorjev,če vidno polje tega tipa traktorja ali teh traktorjev izpolnjuje zahteve te direktive.2.
With effect from 1 October 1980 Member States:may no longer issue the document referred to in the last indent of Article 10(1) of Directive 74/150/EEC in respect of a type of tractor in which the field of vision does not comply with the provisions of this Directive,may refuse to grant national type-approval in respect of a type of tractor whose field of vision does not comply with the provisions of this Directive.3.
Države članice od 1. oktobra 1980 dalje:ne smejo več izdati dokumenta iz zadnje alinee člena 10(1) Direktive 74/150/EGS za tip traktorja, v katerem vidno polje ne izpolnjuje določb te direktive,lahko zavrnejo podelitev nacionalne homologacije traktorja, katerega vidno polje ne izpolnjuje določb te direktive.3.
With effect from 1 January 1983, Member States may prohibit the entry into service of any tractor whose field of vision does not comply with the provisions of this Directive.’
Države članice lahko od 1. januarja 1983 prepovejo začetek uporabe katerega koli traktorja, katerega vidno polje ne izpolnjuje določb te direktive.“
Directive 74/347/EEC
Direktiva 74/347/EGS
Table note (*), Annex II
Opomba (*), Priloga II
Annex, points 1 to 2.3
Priloga, točke 1 do 2.3
Annex I, points 1 to 2.3
Priloga I, točke 1 do 2.3
Annex, point 2.4
Priloga, točka 2.4
Annex, point 2.5
Priloga, točka 2.5
Annex I, point 2.4
Priloga I, točka 2.4
Annex, point 2.6
Priloga, točka 2.6
Annex I, point 2.5
Priloga I, točka 2.5
Annex, figures 1, 2 and 3
Priloga, slike 1, 2 in 3
Annex I, figures 1, 2 and 3
Priloga I, slike 1, 2 in 3
Directive 2008/3/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2008/3/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Directive 2003/54/EC as regards the application of certain provisions to Estonia
o spremembi Direktive 2003/54/ES glede uporabe nekaterih določb v Estoniji
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 47(2), Article 55 and Article 95 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti členov 47(2), 55 in 95 Pogodbe,
During the accession negotiations, Estonia invoked the specific characteristics of its electricity sector to request a transitional period for the application of Directive 96/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 1996 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity [3].
Med pristopnimi pogajanji se je Estonija sklicevala na posebne značilnosti svojega elektroenergetskega sektorja in zaprosila za prehodno obdobje za uporabo Direktive 96/92/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. decembra 1996 o skupnih pravilih notranjega trga z električno energijo [3].
In Annex VI to the 2003 Act of Accession, Estonia was granted a transitional period until 31 December 2008 for the application of Article 19(2) of Directive 96/92/EC, relating to the gradual opening of the market.
V Prilogi VI k Aktu o pristopu iz leta 2003 je bilo Estoniji zagotovljeno prehodno obdobje do 31. decembra 2008 za uporabo člena 19(2) Direktive 96/92/ES v zvezi s postopnim odpiranjem trga.
Declaration No 8 annexed to the Final Act to the 2003 Treaty of Accession recognised moreover that the specific situation relating to the restructuring of the oil shale sector in Estonia was going to require particular efforts until the end of 2012.
Izjava št. 8, priložena k Sklepni listini Pogodbe o pristopu iz leta 2003, poleg tega ugotavlja, da bo poseben položaj v prestrukturiranju sektorja naftnega skrilavca v Estoniji zahteval posebna prizadevanja do konca leta 2012.
Directive 96/92/EC was replaced by Directive 2003/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 96/92/EC [4], which had to be implemented by 1 July 2004 and which had the effect of speeding up the opening of the electricity market.
Direktiva 96/92/ES je bila nadomeščena z Direktivo 2003/54/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2003 o skupnih pravilih za notranji trg z električno energijo in o razveljavitvi Direktive 96/92/ES [4], ki jo je bilo treba izvesti do 1. julija 2004 z namenom, da se pospeši odpiranje trga z električno energijo.
In a further letter of 5 December 2003, Estonia indicated that it was planning to achieve the complete opening of the market provided for in Article 21(1)(c) of that Directive by 31 December 2015.
Z dodatnim pismom z dne 5. decembra 2003 je Estonija najavila, da načrtuje popolno odprtje trga, predvidenega v členu 21(1)(c) navedene direktive do 31. decembra 2015.
The request by Estonia was based on a credible restructuring plan for the oil shale sector extending until 31 December 2012.
Estonska prošnja je utemeljena z verodostojnim načrtom prestrukturiranja sektorja naftnega skrilavca do 31. decembra 2012.
Oil shale is the only real indigenous energy resource in Estonia and national production represents almost 84 % of world production.
Naftni skrilavec je edini avtohtoni vir energije v Estoniji, nacionalna proizvodnja pa pomeni skoraj 84 % svetovne proizvodnje.
It is therefore of great strategic importance for security of supply in Estonia.
Zato ima to velik strateški pomen za zanesljivost dobave v Estoniji.
The granting of a further derogation for the period 2009 to 2012 appeared necessary to guarantee security of investments in generating plants and security of supply in Estonia while allowing the serious environmental problems created by those plants to be resolved.
Z odobritvijo dodatnega odstopanja za obdobje 2009–2012 bo zajamčena varnost naložb v proizvodne obrate in zanesljivost dobav v Estoniji, poleg tega pa se bodo lahko rešili pereči okoljski problemi, ki jih povzročajo ti obrati.
On 28 June 2004 the Council adopted Directive 2004/85/EC amending Directive 2003/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the application of certain provisions to Estonia [5], which granted the requested derogation.
Svet je 28. junija 2004 sprejel Direktivo 2004/85/ES o spremembah Direktive 2003/54/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uporabi nekaterih določb v Estoniji [5], s katero je bilo odobreno zahtevano odstopanje.
By judgment of 28 November 2006 in Case C-413/04, Parliament v. Council [6], the Court of Justice annulled Directive 2004/85/EC, in so far as it granted Estonia a derogation from the application of Article 21(1)(b) and (c) of Directive 2003/54/EC going beyond 31 December 2008 and imposed a corresponding obligation to ensure only a partial opening of the market representing 35 % of consumption on 1 January 2009 and an obligation to communicate annually the consumption thresholds extending eligibility to final customers.
S sodbo z dne 28. novembra 2006 v zadevi C-413/04, Parlament proti Svetu [6], je Sodišče razglasilo za nično Direktivo 2004/85/ES, v kateri se v korist Estonije odobri odstopanje od uporabe člena 21(1)(b) in (c) Direktive 2003/54/ES, ki traja dlje od 31. decembra 2008, in tudi s tem povezana obveznost, da se 1. januarja 2009 zagotovi le delno odprtje trga, ki predstavlja 35 % porabe, ter obveznost letnega posredovanja pragov porabe, ki razširijo upravičenost na končne porabnike.
That partial annulment was not founded on reasons concerning the substance of Directive 2004/85/EC, but was due to the wrong choice of legal basis.
Ta delna razglasitev ničnosti ni bila utemeljena na vsebinskih razlogih Direktive 2004/85/ES, pač pa je bila posledica izbire napačne pravne podlage.
Since the reasons for granting Estonia a derogation from the application of Article 21(1)(b) and (c) of Directive 2003/54/EC going beyond 31 December 2008 remain valid, that Directive should be amended accordingly, with the same wording as in Directive 2004/85/EC but on the correct legal basis,
Ker razlogi za odobritev odstopanja od uporabe člena 21(1)(b) in (c) Direktive 2003/54/ES Estoniji po 31. decembru 2008 ostajajo veljavni, bi bilo treba navedeno direktivo ustrezno spremeniti z besedilom, ki je enako besedilu v Direktivi 2004/85/ES, vendar na pravilni pravni podlagi –
Article 26(3) of Directive 2003/54/EC shall be replaced by the following:
Člen 26(3) Direktive 2003/54/ES se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Estonia shall be granted a temporary derogation from the application of Article 21(1)(b) and (c) until 31 December 2012.
Estoniji se do 31. decembra 2012 odobri začasno odstopanje od uporabe člena 21(1)(b) in (c).
Estonia shall take the measures necessary to ensure the opening of its electricity market.
Estonija izvaja vse potrebne ukrepe, da zagotovi odprtje svojega trga električne energije.
On 1 January 2009, the opening of the market shall represent at least 35 % of consumption.
Odpiranje trga bo 1. januarja 2009 pomenilo najmanj 35 % porabe.
Estonia shall communicate annually to the Commission the consumption thresholds extending eligibility to final customers.’
Estonija Komisiji vsako leto sporoči prage porabe, ki razširijo upravičenost na končne porabnike.“
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 23 January 2008.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo do 23. januarja 2008.
Opinion delivered on 24 October 2007 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 24. oktobra 2007 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
OJ L 236, 7.7.2004, p. 10.
UL L 236, 7.7.2004, str. 10.
ECR [2006] I-11221.
ZOdl. 2006, str. I-11221.
Commission Directive 2008/4/EC
Direktiva Komisije 2008/4/ES
of 9 January 2008
z dne 9. januarja 2008
amending Directive 94/39/EC as regards feedingstuffs intended for the reduction of the risk of milk fever
o spremembi Direktive 94/39/ES glede krme za zmanjšanje tveganja za „mlečno“ mrzlico
Having regard to Council Directive 93/74/EEC of 13 September 1993 on feedingstuffs intended for particular nutritional purposes [1], and in particular Article 6(c) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 93/74/EGS z dne 13. septembra 1993 o krmi za posebne prehranske namene [1] in zlasti člena 6(c) Direktive,
By Directive 94/39/EC [2], the Commission established a list of intended uses of animal feedingstuffs for particular nutritional purposes.
Z Direktivo 94/39/ES [2] je Komisija uvedla seznam predvidenih vrst uporabe krme za posebne prehranske namene.
In its opinion of 8 December 2004 the European Food Safety Authority (the Authority) concluded that zeolite (synthetic sodium aluminium silicate) has the potential of reducing the risk of milk fever in dairy cows [3].
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane („Agencija“) je v mnenju z dne 8. decembra 2004 navedla, da zeolit (sintetični aluminij-natrijev silikat) lahko zmanjša tveganje pri kravah molznicah, da obolijo za mlečno mrzlico [3].