natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Point 2.10 of the Annex to the abovementioned Decision, which explicitly concerns meat and eggs, establishes priority investments, that is investments which are seen as particularly positive by the Commission since they are considered to favour more than others the development of a specific sector.
Točka 2.10 Priloge k navedenemu sklepu, ki izrecno zadeva meso in jajca, določa prednostne naložbe, ki so po mnenju Komisija pozitivne, ker bolj kot druge naložbe prispevajo k razvoju posameznega sektorja.
With respect to priority investments, the Commission looks favourably on the creation of cutting facilities linked to slaughterhouses, particularly in production areas where such facilities do not exist.
Na področju prednostnih naložb Komisija odobrava uvedbo razsekovalnic, povezanih s klavnicami, zlasti na proizvodnih območjih, kjer takšnih objektov ni.
On the other hand, the same point excludes all investments resulting in an increase in the slaughter capacity for pigs, cattle, sheep or poultry, unless equivalent capacity is no longer used by the same or another undertaking or, in the case of pigs, cattle, sheep and poultry other than chickens, the production level in the region indicates a shortfall in production capacity.
Vendar ista točka izključuje vse naložbe, zaradi katerih bi se povečale zmogljivosti za zakol prašičev, goveda, ovac ali perutnine, razen če isto ali drugo podjetje enakovrednih zmogljivosti ne uporablja več ali če raven proizvodnje v regiji v primeru prašičev, goveda, ovac in perutnine, razen piščancev, kaže na pomanjkanje proizvodne zmogljivosti.
As indicated by the Italian authorities, only some of the investments undertaken by them concerned the creation of cutting facilities.
Po navedbah italijanskih organov je bilo le nekaj izvedenih naložb namenjenih izgradnji razsekovalnic.
Since the Italian authorities were unable to specify exactly the part of the investments which went into the cutting facilities, it is necessary to determine whether the investments in question belonged to the type of investments explicitly excluded under point 2.10, namely whether they resulted in an increase in the slaughter capacity unless equivalent capacity was made available by the same or another undertaking.
Ker italijanski organi niso mogli natančno določiti deleža naložb v razsekovalnice, je treba ugotoviti, ali so zadevne naložbe spadale v vrsto naložb, ki so izrecno izključene v skladu s točko 2.10, tj. ali so se zaradi njih povečale zmogljivosti za zakol, razen če je isto ali podobno podjetje zagotovilo enakovredne zmogljivosti.
In their letter of 12 July 2001, the Italian authorities stressed that investments in the slaughtering, processing and marketing of agricultural products were carried out within the framework of seven projects.
Italijanski organi so v dopisu z dne 12. julija 2001 poudarili, da so bile naložbe na področju zakola, predelave in trženja kmetijskih proizvodov izvedene v okviru sedmih projektov.
They provided data showing, for each plant taking part in the project, that the overall ex-post slaughtering capacity is on the whole lower that the ex-ante one by 30 heads/hour.
Predložili so podatke iz katerih je bilo za vsak obrat, ki je sodeloval v projektu, razvidno, da so nove zmogljivosti za zakol gledano v celoti manjše od predhodnih zmogljivosti za 30 glav/uro.
The requirement of point 2.10 of the Annex to Decision 90/342/EEC is therefore observed.
Zahteva iz točke 2.10 Priloge k Sklepu 90/342/EGS se zato upošteva.
Investments in the processing and marketing sector
Naložbe v sektor predelave in trženja
Eligible costs (ITL)
Upravičeni stroški (ITL)
Total contribution (ITL)
Celotni prispevek (ITL)
Investments in less favoured areas
naložbe v območja z omejenimi možnostmi
Investments in other areas
naložbe v druga območja
Investments
naložbe
In accordance with Article 11 of Regulation (EEC) No 866/90, the measures at issue are aimed at rationalising or developing the preparation, preservation, treatment and processing of agricultural products or recycling of by-products or manufacturing waste, at improving marketing channels, including the transparency of price formation, at applying new processing techniques, including the development of new products and by-products, or opening up new markets and innovative investments and at improving product quality.
V skladu s členom 11 Uredbe (EGS) št. 866/90 so zadevni ukrepi namenjeni racionalizaciji ali razvoju priprave, ohranjanja, ravnanja in predelave kmetijskih proizvodov ali recikliranju stranskih proizvodov ali proizvodnji odpadkov, izboljšanju tržnih kanalov, vključno s preglednostjo oblikovanja cen, uporabi novih predelovalnih tehnik, vključno z razvojem novih proizvodov in stranskih proizvodov ali odprtjem novih trgov in inovativnimi naložbami, ter izboljšanju kakovosti proizvodov.
Pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 866/90, eligible expenses are limited to:
V skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe (EGS) št. 866/90 so upravičeni stroški omejeni na:
the acquisition of immovable property, with the exception of land purchase,
pridobitev nepremičnin, razen nakupa zemljišč,
the purchase of new machinery and equipment, including computer software and programmes,
nakup novih strojev in opreme, vključno z računalniško programsko opremo in programi,
general costs, such as architects', engineers' and consultants' fees and feasibility studies, up to a ceiling of 12 % of the costs referred to before.
splošne stroške, kot so plačila za storitve arhitektov, inženirjev in svetovalcev ter študije izvedljivosti, do največ 12 % prejšnjih stroškov.
As explained further below in the document (see points 80 to 98), the financial balance needs should have been excluded from the eligible expenses, which have been recalculated solely on the basis of expenses directly linked to investments and eligible costs.
Kot je razloženo v nadaljevanju dokumenta (glej točke 80-98), bi morale biti zahteve glede finančne bilance izključene iz upravičenih stroškov, ki so bili preračunani le na podlagi stroškov, neposredno povezanih z naložbami in upravičenimi stroški.
Furthermore, the CIPE programme explicitly aimed at ensuring coherence and compliance with CMO rules.
Poleg tega je bil program italijanskega medministrskega ekonomskega odbora namenjen izrecno zagotavljanju usklajenosti s pravili skupne ureditve trga.
In view of the foregoing considerations, the aid granted by the Italian authorities to carry out the investments planned within the framework of the integrated projects described above was compatible with the common market according to Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty.
Ob upoštevanju navedenih ugotovitev je bila pomoč, ki so jo italijanski organi odobrili za izvajanje naložb, predvidenih v okviru navedenih integriranih projektov, združljiva s skupnim trgom v skladu s členom 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES.
This only applies to aid granted in connection with the actual implementation of the investments with the exclusion of any aid granted for the financial recovery of the companies considered and of the aid linked to consolidation loans which are assessed in the following sections.
To velja le za pomoč, odobreno v zvezi z dejanskim izvajanjem naložb, pri čemer je izključena vsaka pomoč, odobrena za finančno sanacijo zadevnih družb, in pomoč, povezana s konsolidacijskimi posojili, ki so ocenjenimi v naslednjih oddelkih.
VI.1.(a) 2. Investments on farms
Naložbe v kmetije
As already explained, the aid scheme also provided for aid in favour of investments at the level of primary production carried out by groups of companies in line with the rationale of the overall project.
Kot je že bilo razloženo, je shema pomoči zagotovila tudi pomoč v korist naložb na ravni primarne proizvodnje, ki so jih v skladu s ciljem celotnega projekta izvedle skupine družb.
Aid was granted to the companies CONAZO, GEA and Val di Cesola.
Pomoč je bila odobrena družbam CONAZO, GEA in Val di Cesola.
The eligible expenses and the total aid received are shown in Table 2.
Upravičeni stroški in celotna prejeta pomoč so prikazani v tabeli 2.
Investments in the production sector
Naložbe v proizvodni sektor
Total eligible expenses (ITL)
Celotni upravičeni stroški (ITL)
Upon the date of approval of the various projects and consequent allocation of the relevant resources, aid for investments on farms was assessed on the basis of the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 2328/91 on improving the efficiency of agricultural structures.
Po datumu odobritve različnih projektov in posledični dodelitvi potrebnih sredstev je bila pomoč za naložbe v kmetije ocenjena na podlagi določb Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2328/91 o izboljšanju učinkovitosti kmetijskih struktur.
The Regulation, which established a part-financed system designed to improve the efficiency of agricultural holdings, applied to individual farms.
Uredba, ki je uvedla delno financiran sistem za izboljšanje učinkovitosti kmetijskih gospodarstev, se je uporabljala za posamezne kmetije.
It established a framework for common action authorising or requiring Member States to put in action a certain number of aid schemes which were partially financed at Community level.
Uvedla je okvir za skupne ukrepe, ki državam članicam dovoljuje, da uvedejo neko število shem pomoči, ki se delno financirajo na ravni Skupnosti, ali to od njih zahteva.
At the same time, the Regulation established a framework regulating the granting of certain types of nationally funded aid from Member States.
Uredba je hkrati določila okvir, ki ureja odobritev nekaterih vrst pomoči, financiranih na nacionalni ravni s strani držav članic.
Article 35 of Regulation (EEC) No 2328/91 defined the conditions under which Member States were authorised to provide State aid in order to achieve the same objectives as set in the Regulation.
Člen 35 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2328/91 je določil pogoje, pod katerimi lahko države članice zagotavljajo državno pomoč za uresničevanje enakih ciljev, kot so določeni v Uredbi.
The types of aid measures which Member States were authorised to grant were therefore clearly defined by the provisions of Article 35 which limited the scope of intervention of Member States with respect to purely State-funded aid.
Vrste ukrepov pomoči, ki so jih države članice lahko odobrile, so bile zato jasno opredeljene v določbah člena 35, ki je omejil obseg ukrepanja držav članic na področju pomoči, ki jo financira le država.
In practice, Member States had to notify the Commission of any decision to grant aid for the initiatives covered by the Regulation either in the framework of the procedure provided for by the Regulation with a view to obtaining Community part-financing or on the basis of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty with respect to State aid.
V praksi so morale države članice Komisijo obvestiti o vseh odločitvah v zvezi z odobritvijo pomoči za pobude iz Uredbe v okviru postopka iz Uredbe za pridobitev delnega financiranja Skupnosti ali na podlagi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe v zvezi z državno pomočjo.
The Italian authorities did not notify the Commission of the aid in question in the framework of the procedure provided for by Regulation (EEC) No 2328/91 with a view to obtaining Community part-financing or pursuant to Article 12(2), (3) and (4) of that Regulation.
Italijanski organi Komisije niso obvestili o zadevni pomoči v okviru postopka iz Uredbe (EGS) št. 2328/91 za pridobitev delnega financiranja Skupnosti ali v skladu s členom 12(2), (3) in (4) navedene uredbe.
The aid measure should therefore be assessed on the basis of Articles 87, 88 and 89 of the Treaty within the limits and on the conditions set out in the Regulation.
Ukrep pomoči je treba zato oceniti na podlagi členov 87, 88 in 89 Pogodbe ter ob upoštevanju omejitev in pogojev iz Uredbe.
Article 12 of Regulation (EEC) No 2328/91 specifies the types of investments which Member States are authorised to fund exclusively out of their own resources.
Člen 12 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2328/91 določa vrste naložb, za katere se lahko države članice odločijo, da jih financirajo izključno iz lastnih sredstev.
As stated under Article 35, Articles 87 to 89 of the Treaty do not apply to Article 12(2), (3) and (4).
Kot določa člen 35, členi 87 do 89 Pogodbe ne veljajo za člen 12(2), (3) in (4).
The aid measures therefore can only be assessed on the basis of Article 12(1) and (5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2328/91.
Zato se lahko ukrepi pomoči ocenijo le na podlagi člena 12(1) in (5) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2328/91.
The measures provided for by Article 12(1) are additional aid which, under strictly defined conditions, may be granted by Member States on top of the Community part-financed system of aid granted under Regulation (EEC) No 2328/91.
Ukrepi iz člena 12(1) so poleg sistema pomoči, ki je odobrena v skladu z Uredbo (EGS) št. 2328/91, pri čemer sistem delno financira Skupnost, dodatna pomoč, ki jo lahko države članice odobrijo pod natančno določenimi pogoji.
These additional aid measures may only be granted to holdings which satisfy all the conditions for eligibility to Community aid as laid down in the Regulation (Articles 5 to 9) and only to integrate previously approved part-financed aid measures.
Ti dodatni ukrepi pomoči se lahko odobrijo le holdingom, ki izpolnjujejo vse pogoje upravičenosti do pomoči Skupnosti iz Uredbe (členi 5 do 9), in le za vključevanje predhodno odobrenih delno financiranih ukrepov pomoči.
Since this paragraph only concerns aid intended to supplement part-financed aid measures previously approved, these aid measures do not fall within its scope.
Ker zadeva ta odstavek le pomoč za dopolnitev delno financiranih ukrepov pomoči, ki so bili predhodno odobreni, ti ukrepi pomoči ne spadajo na njegovo področje uporabe.
Article 12(5) specifies the types of investment aid not subject to the prohibition and limitation provided for by the rest of the Articles and which could in principle be authorised.
Člen 12(5) določa vrste pomoči za naložbe, za katere ne veljata prepoved in omejitev iz ostalih členov in ki bi načeloma lahko bile odobrene.
subsidised operating loans for a period non exceeding one marketing year,
subvencionirana posojila za poslovanje za obdobje, ki ne presega enega tržnega leta,
the purchase of male breeding stock,
nakup matične skupine samcev,
securities for loans contracted, including interest,
vrednostni papirji za sklenjena posojila, vključno z obrestmi,
aid for investment in the protection and improvement of the environment, provided that it does not entail an increase in production,
pomoč za naložbe za varstvo in izboljšanje okolja, če to ne povzroči povečanja proizvodnje,
aid for investment for the purpose of improving hygienic conditions or complying with Community animal welfare standards where these are stricter from Community standards, provided that these investments do not give rise to an increase in production, and that they are granted in accordance with Articles 87 and 88 (formerly 92 and 93) of the Treaty.
pomoč za naložbe za izboljšanje higienskih pogojev ali zagotavljanje skladnosti s standardi Skupnosti za dobro počutje živali, kadar so strožji od standardov Skupnosti, če se zaradi teh naložb ne poveča proizvodnja ter so odobrene v skladu s členoma 87 in 88 (prej 92 in 93) Pogodbe.
The Italian authorities assured that the aid was granted towards the completion of investments going beyond the animal health and well-being standards set in Directive 91/629/EEC and in Directive 91/630/EEC.
Na splošno so naložbe omogočale boljše prezračevanje prostorov, manjšo gostoto naseljenosti živali, boljšo osvetljenost, distribucijo vode itd. Italijanski organi so zagotovili, da je bila pomoč dodeljena za dokončanje naložb, ki presegajo standarde za zdravje in dobro počutje živali iz Direktive 91/629/EGS in Direktive 91/630/EGS.
In their letter of 24 November 2004, registered on 3 December 2004, the Italian authorities provided the list of investments as proof that these were aimed at improving animals' health and well-being and that they went beyond the rules applicable at the time concerning animal hygiene and well-being.
Italijanski organi so v dopisu z dne 24. novembra 2004, vpisanim v evidenco 3. decembra 2004, navedli seznam naložb kot dokaz, da so bile te namenjene boljšemu zdravju in počutju živali ter da so presegle pravila, ki so se takrat uporabljala v zvezi s higieno in dobrim počutjem živali.
Each financed project has been checked by an inspection committee of the Ministry and the relevant Region to verify that the objectives of the projects were achieved.
Vsak financirani projekt je pregledal inšpekcijski odbor ministrstva in ustrezne regije, da je preveril, ali so bili cilji projektov doseženi.
The maximum aid rate provided for in the Regulation (35 % and 75 % in less favoured areas), including all public sources of aid channelled to the investments was not exceeded.
Največja stopnja pomoči iz Uredbe (35 % in 75 % v območjih z omejenimi možnostmi), vključno z vsemi javnimi viri pomoči, ki je usmerjena v naložbe, ni bila presežena.
Furthermore, the Italian authorities assured the Commission that the total number of animals was not increased, following the completion of the investments and that all the investments were carried out in accordance with the requirements in Article 6 of Regulation (EEC) No 2328/91.
Poleg tega so italijanski organi Komisiji zagotovili, da skupno število živali po dokončanju naložb ni večje ter da so se vse naložbe izvedle v skladu z zahtevami iz člena 6 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2328/91.
As set out in Section VI.1 (a) 3, eligible expenses do not include financial recovery needs (esigenze di equilibrio finanziario), nor the loans for debt consolidation.
Kot je določeno v oddelku VI.1(a)3, upravičeni stroški ne zajemajo zahtev v zvezi s finančno sanacijo niti posojil za konsolidacijo dolgov.
As stated in the section above, Article 5(2) of Law No 290/99 stipulates that credit subsidies on loans contracted under Article 15(16) of Law No 67/88 in respect of joint development or debt consolidation measures continue to apply even where the integrated project approved under Article 1 of Law No 87/90, as replaced by Article 1 of Law No 252/91, is only completed in part, provided that the integrated project of the person who took out the loan is completed.
Kot je navedeno v zgornjem oddelku, določa člen 5(2) Zakona št. 290/99, da se kreditne subvencije na posojila, najeta v skladu s členom 15(16) glede skupnega razvoja ali ukrepov za konsolidacijo dolgov, uporabljajo še naprej, čeprav je celostni projekt, ki je odobren v skladu s členom 1 Zakona št. 87/90, kakor je bil nadomeščen s členom 1 Zakona št. 252/91, izveden le delno, pri čemer mora biti celostni projekt osebe, ki je najela posojilo, izveden v celoti.
Article 5(3) provides that credit subsidies on loans contracted under the above Law for the sole purpose of debt consolidation remain valid even where the integrated project fails to be carried out or is carried out only in part, provided that the person who took out the loan submits a personal investment project to be undertaken using some of the loan.
Člen 5(3) določa, da kreditne subvencije na posojila, najeta v skladu z navedenim zakonom izključno za konsolidacijo dolga, ostanejo veljavna, čeprav se celostni projekt ne uspe izvesti ali se izvede le delno, pri čemer mora oseba, ki je najela posojilo, predložiti osebni naložbeni projekt, ki se bo izvedel z uporabo dela posojila.
The credit subsidies referred to in Article 5 of Law No 290/99, which were the subject of the Commission's initial assessment, are provided for in Law No 67/88.
Kreditne subvencije iz člena 5 Zakona št. 290/99, ki so bile predmet predhodne ocene Komisije, so predvidene v Zakonu št. 67/88.
Article 15(16) of this Law, against which the Commission decided to initiate proceedings, provided that cooperatives and their consortia can raise loans up to a maximum of ITL 7000 billion for the construction, restructuring or extension of slaughtering plants.
Člen 15(16) tega zakona, proti kateremu se je Komisija odločila za sprožitev postopka, je določal, da lahko zadruge in njihovi konzorciji povečajo posojila za gradnjo, prestrukturiranje ali razširitev obratov za zakol do največ 7000 milijard ITL.
Also, according to that Article, farmers taking out the loans may use them, up to a limit of ITL 100 billion in 1988 and of ITL 50 billion in 1989, to consolidate existing debt on the aforementioned facilities and premises.
Prav tako lahko v skladu z navedenim členom kmetje, ki so najeli posojila, ta denar porabijo za konsolidacijo obstoječih dolgov za navedene zmogljivosti in obrate, in sicer največ 100 milijard ITL v letu 1988 in 50 milijard ITL v letu 1989.
Both Article 5 of Law No 290/99 and Article 15(16) of Law No 67/88 provide therefore for the possibility to use the allocations to consolidate debts.
Člen 5 Zakona št. 290/99 in člen 15(16) Zakona št. 67/88 zato omogočata porabo dodeljenih sredstev za konsolidacijo dolgov.
Nevertheless, according to the information submitted by the Italian authorities in their reply to the initiation of proceedings by the Commission, within the framework of Law No 252/91, the State also took into account what are described as financial recovery needs.
Kljub temu je država v skladu z informacijami, ki so jih predložili italijanski organi v svojem odgovoru na sprožitev postopka Komisije, v okviru Zakona št. 252/91 prav tako upoštevala tudi t. i. „zahteve glede finančne sanacije“.
According to the Italian authorities, the execution of the project called for a high financial commitment in terms of both the actual implementation of the ‘development projects’ and of recovery of the financial commitment resulting therefrom.
Po mnenju italijanskih organov je izvedba projekta zahtevala veliko finančno obveznost v smislu dejanskega izvajanja „razvojnih projektov“ in sanacije finančne obveznosti, ki izhaja iz takšnega izvajanja.
Financial recovery needs were considered additional to the investments since they were strictly related to the amount of money generated by said investments.
Zahteve glede finančne sanacije so se štele kot dodatek k naložbam, ker so bile tesno povezane z denarjem, pridobljenim z navedenimi naložbami.
In the light of the above, it is apparent that part of the aid granted by the Italian authorities to the companies for the relevant projects was actually aimed at enabling these companies to face the financial burden ensuing from, but not strictly related to, these investments.
Ob upoštevanju navedenih ugotovitev je jasno, da je bil del pomoči, ki so jo italijanski organi odobrili družbam za zadevne projekte, dejansko namenjen tem družbam za zmanjševanje finančnega bremena, ki izhaja iz teh naložb, vendar z njimi ni tesno povezan.
The Commission has always expressed doubts as to the compatibility with the common market of the aid for debt consolidation provided for by Law No 67/88 and of aid for financial recovery granted under Law No 252/91.
Komisija je ves čas dvomila o združljivosti pomoči za konsolidacijo dolgov iz Zakona št. 67/88 in pomoči za finančno sanacijo iz Zakona št. 252/91 s skupnim trgom.
In their reply to the initiation of proceedings, dated 18 May 2000, the Italian authorities claimed that both aid measures were granted in connection with investments carried out within the framework of the integrated projects planned.
Italijanski organi so v odgovoru na sprožitev postopka z dne 18. maja 2000 trdili, da sta bila oba ukrepa pomoči odobrena v povezavi z naložbami, ki so se izvedle v okviru načrtovanih celostnih projektov.
Indeed, the Italian authorities stated that Law No 67/88 had linked the acknowledgement of debt consolidation to the actual completion of the investment projects.
Italijanski organi so dejansko navedli, da je Zakon št. 67/88 potrditev konsolidacije dolgov povezal z dejanskim dokončanjem naložbenih projektov.
In their opinion, the consolidation loan simply aimed at providing cooperatives with liquidity and in this respect worked as a grant.
Po njihovem mnenju so bila konsolidacijska posojila namenjena le temu, da zadrugam zagotovijo likvidnost in so se lahko v tem smislu štela kot subvencija.
The consolidation loan was a financial operation linked, in every case, to an investment project.
Konsolidacijsko posojilo je bil finančni posel, ki je bil v vsakem primeru povezan z naložbenim projektom.