natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Future questionnaires?
prihodnjih vprašalnikov?
Any other comments
Druge pripombe
For the purpose of this questionnaire ‘total number of installations’ shall additionally include those installations, which do not fall under the scope of Directive 1999/13/EC, but are regulated by national law according to the provisions of the Directive.
V tem vprašalniku zajema „skupno število obratov“ tudi tiste obrate, ki ne spadajo v področje uporabe Direktive 1999/13/ES, ampak jih ureja nacionalna zakonodaja v skladu z določbami Direktive.
Installations for coating of road vehicles as defined in Directive 70/156/EEC, or part of them, carried out as part of vehicle repair, conservation or decoration outside of manufacturing installations, shall not be included.
Obrati za lakiranje cestnih vozil, kot so opredeljena v Direktivi 70/156/EGS, ali njihovih delov pri popravljanju vozil, njihovem konzerviranju ali dekoriranju zunaj proizvodnih obratov, niso zajeti.
Council Decision 2007/533/JHA
Sklep Sveta 2007/533/PNZ
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 30(1)(a) and (b), 31(1)(a) and (b) and 34(2)(c) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti člena 30(1)(a) in (b), člena 31(1)(a) in (b) ter člena 34(2)(c) Pogodbe,
The Schengen information system (SIS) set up pursuant to the provisions of Title IV of the Convention of 19 June 1990 implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders [2] (the Schengen Convention), and its development, SIS 1+, constitute an essential tool for the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis as integrated into the framework of the European Union.
Schengenski informacijski sistem („SIS“), vzpostavljen v skladu z določbami naslova IV Konvencije z dne 19. junija 1990 o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma z dne 14. junija 1985 med vladami držav Gospodarske unije Beneluks, Zvezne republike Nemčije in Francoske republike o postopni odpravi kontrol na skupnih mejah [2] („Schengenska konvencija“), in njegov razvoj (SIS 1+) predstavljata pomembno orodje za uporabo določb schengenskega pravnega reda, kakor je vključen v okvir Evropske unije.
The development of the second generation of SIS (SIS II) has been entrusted to the Commission pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001 [3] and Council Decision 2001/886/JHA of 6 December 2001 on the development of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) [4].
Razvoj druge generacije SIS („SIS II“) je bil zaupan Komisiji v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2424/2001 [3] in Sklepom Sveta 2001/886/PNZ z dne 6. decembra 2001 o razvoju druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) [4].
This Decision constitutes the necessary legislative basis for governing SIS II in respect of matters falling within the scope of the Treaty on European Union (the EU Treaty).
Ta sklep predstavlja potrebno pravno podlago za urejanje SIS II glede zadev, ki spadajo v področje uporabe Pogodbe o Evropski uniji („Pogodba EU“).
Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) [5] constitutes the necessary legislative basis for governing SIS II in respect of matters falling within the scope of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty).
Uredba (ES) št. 1987/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o vzpostavitvi, delovanju in uporabi druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) [5] predstavlja potrebno pravno podlago za urejanje SIS II glede zadev, ki spadajo v področje uporabe Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti („Pogodba ES“).
SIS II should constitute a compensatory measure contributing to maintaining a high level of security within the area of freedom, security and justice of the European Union by supporting operational cooperation between police authorities and judicial authorities in criminal matters.
SIS II bi moral predstavljati izravnalni ukrep za vzdrževanje visoke stopnje varnosti na območju svobode, varnosti in pravice Evropske unije, in sicer tako, da podpira operativno sodelovanje med policijskimi in pravosodnimi organi v kazenskih zadevah.
SIS II is to include a central system (Central SIS II) and national applications.
SIS II bo vključeval centralni sistem (centralni SIS II) in nacionalne aplikacije.
The expenditure involved in the operation of Central SIS II and related communication infrastructure should be charged to the general budget of the European Union.
Izdatki, povezani z delovanjem centralnega SIS II in komunikacijske infrastrukture, bi morali bremeniti splošni proračun Evropske unije.
It is necessary to establish a manual setting out the detailed rules for the exchange of certain supplementary information concerning the action called for by alerts.
Treba je oblikovati priročnik s podrobnimi predpisi za izmenjavo dopolnilnih podatkov v zvezi z razpisanim ukrepom.
For a transitional period, the Commission should be responsible for the operational management of Central SIS II and of parts of the communication infrastructure.
V prehodnem obdobju bi morala biti za operativno upravljanje centralnega SIS II in delov komunikacijske infrastrukture odgovorna Komisija. Da se zagotovi nemoten prehod na SIS II, pa Komisija lahko to pristojnost deloma ali v celoti prenese na dva nacionalna organa javnega sektorja. Na podlagi presoje vpliva, ki vsebuje podrobno analizo alternativnih možnosti s finančnega, operativnega in organizacijskega vidika, ter zakonodajnih predlogov Komisije bi bilo treba dolgoročno gledano vzpostaviti organ za upravljanje, ki bo pristojen za te naloge. Prehodno obdobje ne bi smelo trajati več kot pet let od datuma začetka veljavnosti tega sklepa.
However, in order to ensure a smooth transition to SIS II, it may delegate some or all of these responsibilities to two national public sector bodies.
SIS II bi moral vsebovati razpise ukrepov zoper osebe, za katere se zahteva prijetje zaradi predaje ali izročitve.
It should be possible to add to SIS II a translation of the additional data entered for the purpose of surrender under the European Arrest Warrant and for the purpose of extradition.
Omogočiti bi bilo treba, da se v SIS II lahko doda prevod dodatnih podatkov, vnesenih zaradi predaje na podlagi evropskega naloga za prijetje in zaradi izročitve.
SIS II should contain alerts on missing persons to ensure their protection or to prevent threats, on persons wanted for judicial procedure, on persons and objects for discreet checks or specific checks and on objects for seizure or use as evidence in criminal proceedings.
SIS II bi moral vsebovati razpise ukrepov v zvezi s pogrešanimi osebami, da se jim zagotovi zaščita ali da se jih odvrne od nevarnosti, v zvezi z osebami, iskanimi zaradi sodnih postopkov, v zvezi z osebami in stvarmi zaradi prikrite ali namenske kontrole, in v zvezi s stvarmi zaradi zasega ali uporabe kot dokazov v kazenskem postopku.
Alerts should not be kept in SIS II longer than the time required to fulfil the purposes for which they were supplied.
Razpisi ukrepov bi se morali hraniti v SIS II le toliko časa, kolikor je to potrebno za izpolnitev namena, zaradi katerega so bili zagotovljeni. Načeloma bi bilo treba razpise ukrepov za osebe iz SIS II avtomatsko izbrisati po treh letih.
As a general principle, alerts on persons should be automatically erased from SIS II after a period of three years.
Razpisi ukrepov za stvari, vneseni zaradi prikrite kontrole ali namenske kontrole, bi se morali avtomatsko izbrisati iz SIS II po petih letih.
Alerts on objects entered for discreet checks or specific checks should be automatically erased from the SIS II after a period of five years.
Razpise ukrepov za stvari zaradi zasega ali uporabe kot dokazov v kazenskem postopku bi se morali iz SIS II avtomatsko izbrisati po desetih letih.
Alerts on objects for seizure or use as evidence in criminal proceedings should be automatically erased from SIS II after a period of 10 years.
Odločitve o hranjenju razpisov ukrepov za osebe bi morale temeljiti na celoviti posamični oceni.
In the same perspective, SIS II should also allow for the processing of data concerning individuals whose identity has been misused in order to avoid inconveniences caused by their misidentification, subject to suitable safeguards, in particular the consent of the individual concerned and a strict limitation of the purposes for which such data can be lawfully processed.
V istem kontekstu bi moral SIS II omogočati tudi obdelavo podatkov oseb, katerih identiteta je bila zlorabljena, da se prepreči neprijetnosti zaradi napačne identifikacije, pri tem je treba upoštevati ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe, zlasti soglasje zadevnih oseb in strogo omejitev namenov, v katere se take podatke lahko zakonito obdeluje.
It should be possible for a Member State to add an indication, called a flag, to an alert, to the effect that the action to be taken on the basis of the alert will not be taken on its territory.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba tudi omogočiti, da dodajo označitev k razpisu ukrepa, v nadaljevanju označitev, kar pomeni, da na svojem ozemlju ne bodo izvedle ukrepa, ki ga zahteva razpis ukrepa.
When alerts are issued for arrest for surrender purposes, nothing in this Decision should be construed so as to derogate from or prevent the application of the provisions contained in the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA.
Pri izdaji razpisov za prijetje zaradi predaje, se ne bi smelo nobene določbe iz tega sklepa razlagati tako, da odstopa od določb iz Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/PNZ ali preprečuje njihovo uporabo.
The decision to add a flag to an alert should be based only on the grounds for refusal contained in that Framework Decision.
Odločitev, da se razpisu ukrepa doda označitev, bi morala temeljiti samo na razlogih za zavrnitev iz tega okvirnega sklepa.
When a flag has been added and the whereabouts of the person wanted for arrest for surrender becomes known, the whereabouts should always be communicated to the issuing judicial authority, which may decide to transmit a European Arrest Warrant to the competent judicial authority in accordance with the provisions of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA.
Če se doda označitev in je bilo ugotovljeno bivališče osebe, za katero se zahteva prijetje zaradi predaje, bi bilo treba informacijo o bivališču zmeraj sporočiti pravosodnemu organu, ki je izdal razpis ukrepa; slednji se lahko odloči, da pristojnemu pravosodnemu organu posreduje evropski nalog za prijetje v skladu z določbami Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/PNZ.
Data processed in SIS II in application of this Decision should not be transferred or made available to third countries or to international organisations.
Podatki, obdelani v SIS II v okviru uporabe tega sklepa, se ne bi smeli posredovati ali dati na razpolago tretjim državam ali mednarodnim organizacijam.
However, it is appropriate to strengthen cooperation between the European Union and Interpol by promoting an efficient exchange of passport data.
Vendar pa bi bilo primerno okrepiti sodelovanje med Evropsko unijo in Interpolom s pospeševanjem učinkovite izmenjave podatkov o potnih listih.
Where personal data is transferred from SIS II to Interpol, these personal data should be subject to an adequate level of protection, guaranteed by an agreement, providing strict safeguards and conditions.
Če se osebni podatki iz SIS II posredujejo Interpolu, bi morali biti ti ustrezno varovani, kar bi se zagotovilo s sporazumom, ki bi določal stroge varnostne ukrepe in pogoje.
All Member States have ratified the Council of Europe Convention of 28 January 1981 for the protection of individuals with regard to automatic processing of personal data.
Vse države članice so ratificirale Konvencijo Sveta Evrope z dne 28. januarja 1981 o varstvu posameznikov glede na avtomatsko obdelavo osebnih podatkov.
The Convention allows exceptions and restrictions to the rights and obligations it provides, within certain limits.
Konvencija z nekaterimi omejitvami dovoljuje izjeme in omejitve glede pravic in obveznosti, ki jih zagotavlja.
The personal data processed in the context of the implementation of this Decision should be protected in accordance with the principles of the Convention.
Osebne podatke, ki se obdelujejo v okviru izvajanja tega sklepa, bi bilo treba varovati v skladu z načeli Konvencije.
The principles set out in the Convention should be supplemented or clarified in this Decision where necessary.
Kjer je potrebno, bi bilo treba načela iz Konvencije v tem sklepu dopolniti ali obrazložiti.
The principles contained in Recommendation R (87) 15 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe of 17 September 1987 regulating the use of personal data in the police sector should be taken into account when personal data is processed by police authorities in application of this Decision.
Pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov s strani policijskih organov v okviru uporabe tega sklepa bi bilo treba upoštevati načela iz Priporočila št. R(87)15 Odbora ministrov Sveta Evrope z dne 17. septembra 1987 o uporabi osebnih podatkov v policijskem sektorju.
The Commission has submitted a proposal to the Council for a Framework Decision on the data protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, which should be approved by the end of 2006 and be applied to the personal data which are processed in the framework of the second generation of the Schengen Information System and the related exchange of supplementary information pursuant to this Decision.
Komisija je Svetu poslala predlog okvirnega sklepa o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, ki bi moral biti sprejet do konca leta 2006 in se uporabljati za osebne podatke, ki se v skladu s tem sklepom obdelujejo v okviru druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema, in s tem povezano izmenjavo dopolnilnih podatkov.
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [7] and in particular thereof concerning confidentiality and security of processing apply to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies when carrying out their responsibilities in the operational management of SIS II in the exercise of activities all or part of which fall within the scope of Community law.
Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [7], zlasti določbe v zvezi z zaupnostjo in varnostjo obdelave, se uporablja pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov s strani institucij ali teles Skupnosti, ko izvajajo svoje pristojnosti za operativno upravljanje SIS II, kar v celoti ali delno spada v področje uporabe zakonodaje Skupnosti.
Part of the processing of personal data in SIS II falls within the scope of Community law.
Obdelava osebnih podatkov v SIS II delno spada v področje uporabe zakonodaje Skupnosti.
Consistent and homogeneous application of the rules regarding the protection of individuals' fundamental rights and freedoms with regard to the processing of personal data requires clarification that, when the Commission is processing personal data in application of this Decision, Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 is applicable to it.
Za dosledno in usklajeno izvajanje pravil glede varstva temeljnih pravic in svoboščin posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov je potrebna obrazložitev, da se za Komisijo, ko ta obdeluje osebne podatke v okviru uporabe tega sklepa, uporablja Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001.
The principles set out in Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 should be supplemented or clarified in this Decision where necessary.
Kjer je potrebno, je treba v tem sklepu dopolniti ali obrazložiti načela iz Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001.
In so far as confidentiality is concerned, the relevant provisions of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and the conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities should apply to officials or other servants employed and working in connection with SIS II.
Kar zadeva zaupnost, bi se morale za zaposlene uradnike in druge uslužbence, katerih delo je povezano s SIS II, uporabljati ustrezne določbe Kadrovskih predpisov za uradnike Evropskih skupnosti in pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Evropskih skupnosti.
It is appropriate that national supervisory authorities monitor the lawfulness of the processing of personal data by the Member States, whilst the European Data Protection Supervisor, appointed pursuant to Decision 2004/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 December 2003 appointing the independent supervisory body provided for in Article 286 of the EC Treaty [8], should monitor the activities of the Community institutions and bodies in relation to the processing of personal data in view of the limited tasks of the Community institutions and bodies with regard to the data themselves.
Primerno je, da nacionalni nadzorni organi spremljajo zakonitost obdelav osebnih podatkov, ki jih izvajajo države članice, Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov, imenovan v skladu s Sklepom 2004/55/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. decembra 2003 o imenovanju neodvisnega nadzornega organa, kakor je določeno v členu 286 Pogodbe ES [8], pa bi moral spremljati dejavnosti institucij in teles Skupnosti v zvezi z obdelavo osebnih podatkov, pri tem pa upoštevati omejene naloge institucij in organov Skupnosti v zvezi s samimi podatki.
The provisions of the Convention of 26 July 1995 on the establishment of a European Police Office [9] (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Europol Convention’) concerning data protection apply to the processing of SIS II data by Europol, including the powers of the Joint Supervisory Body, set up under the Europol Convention, to monitor the activities of Europol and liability for any unlawful processing of personal data by Europol.
Določbe Konvencije z dne 26. julija 1995 o ustanovitvi Evropskega policijskega urada [9] (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Konvencija o Europolu“) glede varstva podatkov se uporabljajo za obdelavo podatkov SIS II, ki jo izvaja Europol; to vključuje tudi pristojnost Skupnega nadzornega organa, ustanovljenega v skladu s Konvencijo o Europolu, za spremljanje dejavnosti Europola in odgovornosti za kakršno koli nezakonito obdelavo osebnih podatkov s strani Europola.
The provisions of Decision 2002/187/JHA of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime [10] concerning data protection apply to the processing of SIS II data by Eurojust, including the powers of the Joint Supervisory Body, set up under that Decision, to monitor the activities of Eurojust and liability for any unlawful processing of personal data by Eurojust.
Določbe Sklepa 2002/187/PNZ z dne 28. februarja 2002 o ustanovitvi Eurojusta za okrepitev boja proti težjim oblikam kriminala [10] glede varstva podatkov se uporabljajo za obdelavo podatkov SIS II, ki jo izvaja Eurojust; to vključuje tudi pristojnost Skupnega nadzornega organa, ustanovljenega v skladu z navedenim sklepom, za spremljanje dejavnosti Eurojusta in odgovornosti za kakršno koli nezakonito obdelavo osebnih podatkov s strani Eurojusta.
In order to ensure transparency, a report on the technical functioning of Central SIS II and the communication infrastructure, including its security, and on the exchange of supplementary information should be produced every two years by the Commission or, when it is established, the management authority.
Zaradi zagotovitve preglednosti bi morala Komisija oziroma v primeru, da je ustanovljen, organ za upravljanje vsake dve leti pripraviti poročilo o tehničnem delovanju centralnega SIS II in komunikacijske infrastrukture, vključno z varnostjo, ter o izmenjavi dopolnilnih podatkov.
Certain aspects of SIS II such as technical rules on entering data, including data required for entering an alert, updating, deleting and searching data, rules on compatibility and priority of alerts, the adding of flags, links between alerts and exchange of supplementary information cannot owing to their technical nature, level of detail and need for regular updating be covered exhaustively by the provisions of this Decision.
Nekaterih vidikov SIS II, kot so tehnična pravila o vnašanju podatkov, vključno s podatki, potrebnimi za vnos razpisa ukrepa, posodabljanju, brisanju in iskanju podatkov, pravila o skladnosti in prednostni obravnavi razpisanih ukrepov, vnosu označitev, povezavi med razpisanimi ukrepi in izmenjavi dopolnilnih podatkov, določbe tega sklepa ne morejo izčrpno pokriti zaradi njihove tehnične narave, stopnje podrobnosti in potrebe po rednem posodabljanju.
Implementing powers in respect of those aspects should therefore be delegated to the Commission.
Zato bi bilo treba Komisiji v zvezi s temi vidiki podeliti izvedbena pooblastila.
This Decision should define the procedure for the adoption of the measures necessary for its implementation.
Ta sklep bi moral opredeliti postopek za sprejetje ukrepov, potrebnih za njegovo izvajanje.
The procedure for adopting implementing measures under this Decision and Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 should be the same.
Postopek za sprejetje izvedbenih ukrepov v skladu s tem sklepom in Uredbo (ES) št. 1987/2006 bi moral biti enak.
Furthermore, any modification, addition, correction or update of an alert transferred from SIS 1+ to SIS II, as well as any hit on such an alert, should trigger an immediate examination of its compatibility with the provisions of this Decision.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba ob kakršni koli spremembi, dodajanju, popravljanju ali posodabljanju razpisa, ki je bil prenesen iz SIS 1+ v SIS II, pa tudi pri vsakem zadetku za takšen razpis takoj pregledati njihovo skladnost z določbami tega sklepa.
It is necessary to lay down special provisions regarding the part of the budget earmarked for the operations of SIS which is not part of the general budget of the European Union.
Treba je določiti posebne določbe glede neporabljenih sredstev, namenjenih za dejavnosti SIS, ki niso del splošnega proračuna Evropske unije.
Since the objectives of the action to be taken, namely the establishment and regulation of a joint information system, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale and effects of the action, be better achieved at the level of the European Union, the Council may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, as set out in Article 5 of the EC Treaty and referred to in Article 2 of the EU Treaty.
Ker ciljev predlaganega ukrepa, in sicer vzpostavitve skupnega informacijskega sistema in njegove pravne ureditve, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker ta cilj zaradi obsega in učinkov predlaganega ukrepa laže doseže Skupnost, lahko Skupnost sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe ES in člena 2 Pogodbe EU.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in Article 5 of the EC Treaty, this Decision does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve those objectives.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti, kakor je določeno v členu 5 Pogodbe ES, ta sklep ne prekoračuje tistega, kar je potrebno za dosego teh ciljev.
This Decision respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Ta sklep spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva sprejeta načela, zlasti načela Listine Unije o temeljnih pravicah.