natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for foodstuffs from the United States of America.’;
ameriškega kmetijskega ministrstva (USDA) za živila iz Združenih držav Amerike.“
the following paragraph 8 is added:
Doda se odstavek 8:
By way of derogation from paragraphs 1 to 6, consignments of foodstuffs referred to in point (g) of the second paragraph of Article 1 may be imported into the Community without being accompanied by the results of sampling and analysis and a health certificate.’;
Z odstopanjem od odstavkov 1 do 6 se pošiljke živil iz točke (g) drugega odstavka člena 1 lahko uvažajo v Skupnost, pri čemer ni potrebno, da jih spremljajo rezultati vzorčenja in analiz ter zdravstveno spričevalo.“
in Article 5, paragraph 2, the following points (f) and (g) are added:
V členu 5(2) se dodata točki (f) in (g):
approximately 5 % of the consignments of foodstuffs from the United States of America, referred to in point (f) of the second paragraph of Article 1;
približno 5 % pošiljk živil iz Združenih držav Amerike iz točke (f) drugega odstavka člena 1;
each consignment of foodstuffs from the United States of America, referred to in point (g) of the second paragraph of Article 1.’;
vsako pošiljko živil iz Združenih držav Amerike iz točke (g) drugega odstavka člena 1.“
the following Article 7a is inserted:
Vstavi se člen 7a:
Additional conditions as regards imports of foodstuffs from the United States of America
Dodatni pogoji v zvezi z uvozom živil iz Združenih držav Amerike
As regards imports from the United States of America, the analysis provided for in Article 3(1) must be performed by an USDA approved laboratory for aflatoxin analysis or a laboratory undergoing the USDA approval process, which has been accredited in accordance with EN ISO/IEC 17025.
V zvezi z uvozi iz Združenih držav Amerike mora analize iz člena 3(1) opraviti uradni laboratorij USDA za analizo aflatoksinov ali laboratorij, ki je v postopku pridobitve dovoljenja s strani USDA in je že akreditiran v skladu standardom EN ISO/IEC 17025.
However, where the laboratory has not yet been so accredited, it must:
Če laboratorij še ni bil akreditiran v skladu z zadevnim standardom, mora:
have initiated and be pursuing the necessary accreditation procedures; and
dokazati, da je začel in uresničuje potrebne akreditacijske postopke; ter
provide sufficient guarantees that quality control schemes for the aflatoxin analyses it conducts are in place.
zagotoviti zadovoljiva jamstva, da obstajajo sheme nadzora kakovosti za analize aflatoksina, ki jih izvaja.
The health certificate provided for in Article 3(1) accompanying consignments of foodstuffs referred to in point (f) of the second paragraph of Article 1 shall make a reference to the Voluntary Aflatoxin Sampling Plan.’;
V zdravstvenem spričevalu iz člena 3(1), ki spremlja pošiljke živil iz točke (f) drugega odstavka člena (1), se navede sklic na načrt za naključno vzorčenje aflatoksinov.“
Costs related to imports of foodstuffs from Brazil, Iran and the United States of America
Stroški, povezani z uvozom živil iz Brazilije, Irana in Združenih držav Amerike
All costs resulting from sampling, analysis, storage and issuing of accompanying official documents and of copies of the health certificate and accompanying documents pursuant to Articles 3(1) and 5(3) for foodstuffs from Brazil, Iran and the United States of America as referred to in points (a), (d) and (g) of the second paragraph of Article 1 and to processed and compound foodstuffs derived from or containing the foodstuffs referred to in those points shall be borne by the food business operator responsible for the consignment or its representative.
Vse stroške, ki nastanejo pri vzorčenju, analizah, skladiščenju in izdaji uradnih spremnih dokumentov ter izvodov zdravstvenega spričevala in spremnih dokumentov v skladu s členoma 3(1) in 5(3) za živila iz Brazilije, Irana in Združenih držav Amerike iz točk (a), (d) in (g) drugega odstavka člena 1, ter za predelana in sestavljena živila, ki so pridobljena ali ki vsebujejo živila iz zadevnih točk, poravna nosilec živilske dejavnosti, ki je odgovoren za pošiljko, ali njegov predstavnik.
All costs related to official measures taken by the competent authorities as regards non-compliance of consignments of foodstuffs referred to in points (a) to (g) of the second paragraph of Article 1 and to processed and compound foodstuffs derived from or containing the foodstuffs referred to in these points shall be borne by the food business operator responsible for the consignment or its representative.’
Vse stroške v zvezi z uradnimi ukrepi, ki jih sprejmejo pristojni organi v zvezi z neustreznostjo pošiljk živil iz točk (a) do (g) drugega odstavka člena 1 ter predelanimi in sestavljenimi živili, ki so pridobljena ali ki vsebujejo živila iz teh točk, poravna nosilec živilske dejavnosti, ki je odgovoren za pošiljko, ali njegov predstavnik.“
This Decision shall apply from 1 September 2007.
Ta odločba se uporablja od 1. septembra 2007.
This Decision is not applicable to consignments of almonds and derived products which left the United States of America before 1 September 2007.
Ta odločba se ne uporablja za pošiljke mandljev in proizvodov iz njih, ki zapustijo Združene države Amerike pred 1. septembrom 2007.
Decision as amended by Decision 2007/459/EC (OJ L 174, 4.7.2007, p. 8).
Odločba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo 2007/459/ES (UL L 174, 4.7.2007, str. 8).
Report of a mission carried out in the United States of America from 11 to 15 September 2006 in order to assess the control systems in place to control aflatoxin contamination in almonds intended for export to the European Union (DG (SANCO)/8300/2006 — MR).
Poročilo o misiji, opravljeni v Združenih državah Amerike od 11. septembra do 15. septembra 2006, za oceno obstoječih nadzornih sistemov za preprečevanje onesnaževanja z aflatoksinom v mandljih, ki so namenjeni za izvoz v Evropsko unijo (DG (SANCO)8300/2006 – MR).
exempting certain services in the postal sector in Finland, excluding the Åland Islands, from the application of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors
o izvzetju nekaterih storitev v poštnem sektorju na Finskem, z izjemo Ålandskih otokov, iz uporabe Direktive 2004/17/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil naročnikov v vodnem, energetskem in transportnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev
(notified under document number C(2007) 3700)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 3700)
Having regard to the request submitted by Finland by e-mail of 9 February 2007,
ob upoštevanju zahtevka, ki ga je Finska poslala po elektronski pošti 9. februarja 2007,
After consulting the Advisory Committee for Public Contracts,
po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom za javna naročila,
On 9 February 2007, Finland transmitted a request pursuant to Article 30(4) of Directive 2004/17/EC to the Commission by e-mail.
Dne 9. februarja 2007 je Finska Komisiji po elektronski pošti poslala zahtevo v skladu s členom 30(4) Direktive 2004/17/ES.
The Commission requested additional information by e-mails of 21 March, 18 April and 15 May 2007, which was transmitted by the Finnish authorities by e-mails of 4 April, 24 April and 16 May 2007.
Komisija je po elektronski pošti dne 21. marca 2007, 18. aprila 2007 in 15. maja 2007 zahtevala dodatne informacije, ki so jih finski organi poslali po elektronski pošti dne 4. aprila 2007, 24. aprila 2007 in 16. maja 2007.
The request submitted by Finland on behalf of Suomen Posti Oyj, which as of 1 June 2007 changed its name to Itella Oyj, (hereinafter referred to as Finland Post) concerns certain postal services as well as certain services other than postal services in Finland, excluding the Åland Islands.
Zahteva, ki jo je Finska predložila v imenu družbe Suomen Posti Oyj, ki je 1. junija 2007 spremenila svoje ime Itella Oyj (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Finland Post“), se nanaša na določene poštne storitve in določene druge storitve na Finskem, z izjemo Ålandskih otokov.
The services described in the request are as follows:
Storitve, opisane v zahtevi, so naslednje:
addressed letters services (Consumer to Consumer (CtC), Consumer to Business (CtB), Business to Business (BtB) and Business to Consumer (BtC)), both domestic and international;
storitve naslovljene pisemske pošte (od potrošnika do potrošnika, od potrošnika do podjetij, medpodjetniške in od podjetij do potrošnika) v domovini in tujini;
addressed direct mail services;
storitve naslovljene direktne pošte;
unaddressed direct mail services;
storitve nenaslovljene direktne pošte;
BtB standard parcel services, domestic and international;
medpodjetniške storitve standardne paketne pošte v domovini in tujini;
BtC standard parcel services, domestic and international;
storitve standardne paketne pošte od podjetij do potrošnika v domovini in tujini;
consumer standard parcel services (CtC and CtB), domestic and international;
storitve standardne paketne pošte (od potrošnika do potrošnika in od potrošnika do podjetij) v domovini in tujini;
express and courier parcel services, domestic and international;
storitve hitre in kurirske paketne pošte v domovini in tujini;
early delivery of newspapers;
zgodnja dostava časopisa;
standard delivery of newspapers;
standardna dostava časopisa;
light goods services (also called single consignments) and freight services;
storitve za lahko blago (imenovane tudi enojne pošiljke) in storitve prevoza blaga;
warehousing services;
storitve skladiščenja;
contract logistics;
pogodbena logistika;
overall solutions in respect of direct mail;
celovite rešitve za direktno pošto;
printing services;
storitve tiskanja;
data management services;
storitve upravljanja podatkov;
e-transaction services;
storitve elektronskega poslovanja;
philatelic services.
filatelistične storitve.
The request is accompanied by the conclusions of the independent national authority, Kilpailuvirasto/Konkurrensverket (the Finnish Competition Authority), which, on the one hand, does not see ‘any particular reason to oppose the granting of the exclusion referred to in Article 30 …’, while stating on the other hand that ‘it should be remembered that Finland Post Corporation still has a very strong market position in its traditional core business, i.e. the collection and distribution of letters, packages and other addressed items, even though the entire postal sector was opened up to competition in Finland as early as 1994 pursuant to the Act on Postal Operations.
Zahtevi so priloženi zaključki neodvisnega nacionalnega organa, Kilpailuvirasto/Konkurrensverket (finski organ za konkurenco), ki na eni strani ne vidi „nobenega posebnega razloga za nasprotovanje odobritvi izključitve iz člena 30 …“, medtem ko na drugi strani navaja, da „ne smemo pozabiti, da ima Finska pošta v svoji tradicionalni osnovni dejavnosti še vedno zelo močan položaj na trgu, tj. zbiranje in dostava pisem, paketov in drugih naslovljenih pošiljk, čeprav je bil v skladu z Zakonom o poštnih dejavnostih celoten poštni sektor na Finskem odprt za konkurenco že leta 1994.
Nevertheless, no competition has emerged in Finland Post Corporation’s traditional core business.’
Kljub temu se v tradicionalni osnovni dejavnosti Finske pošte ni pojavila konkurenca. …“
Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC provides that contracts intended to enable the performance of one of the activities to which Directive 2004/17/EC applies shall not be subject to that Directive if, in the Member State in which it is carried out, the activity is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted.
Člen 30 Direktive 2004/17/ES določa, da naročila, katerih namen je omogočanje opravljanja dejavnosti, za katere se uporablja Direktiva 2004/17/ES, niso predmet te direktive, če je v državi članici, v kateri se dejavnost opravlja, dejavnost neposredno izpostavljena konkurenci na trgih, do katerih dostop ni omejen.
Direct exposure to competition is assessed on the basis of objective criteria, taking account of the specific characteristics of the sector concerned.
Neposredna izpostavljenost konkurenci se oceni na podlagi objektivnih meril, ob upoštevanju posebnih značilnosti zadevnega sektorja.
Access is deemed to be unrestricted if the Member State has implemented and applied the relevant Community legislation opening a given sector or a part of it.
Šteje se, da dostop ni omejen, če država članica izvaja in uporablja ustrezno zakonodajo Skupnosti, ki odpira določen sektor ali njegov del.
Since Finland has implemented and applied Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 on common rules for the development of the internal market of Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service [2], access to the market should be deemed not to be restricted in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 30(3) of Directive 2004/17/EC.
Ker Finska izvaja in uporablja Direktivo 97/67/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. decembra 1997 o skupnih pravilih za razvoj notranjega trga poštnih storitev Skupnosti in za izboljšanje kakovosti storitve [2], se šteje, da dostop ni omejen v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 30(3) Direktive 2004/17/ES.
Direct exposure to competition in a particular market should be evaluated on the basis of various criteria, none of which are, per se, decisive.
Neposredno izpostavljenost konkurenci na določenem trgu je treba oceniti na podlagi različnih meril, od katerih samo po sebi nobeno ni odločilno.
In respect of the markets concerned by this decision, the market share of the main players on a given market constitutes one criterion which should be taken into account.
Dejavnik, ki ga je v zvezi s trgi, na katere se nanaša ta odločba, treba upoštevati in predstavlja eno merilo, je tržni delež glavnih akterjev na posameznem trgu.
Another criterion is the degree of concentration on those markets.
Drugo merilo je stopnja koncentracije na teh trgih.
As the conditions vary for the different activities that are concerned by this Decision, the examination of the competitive situation should take into account the different situations on different markets.
Ker se pogoji razlikujejo za različne dejavnosti, na katere se nanaša ta odločba, je treba pri preverjanju konkurenčnih razmer upoštevati različne razmere na različnih trgih.
Although narrower market definitions might be envisaged in certain cases, the precise definition of the relevant market can be left open for the purposes of this Decision as far as a number of the services listed in the request submitted by Finland are concerned to the extent that the result of the analysis remains the same whether it is based on a narrow or a broader definition.
Čeprav je v določenih primerih mogoče predvideti ožje opredelitve trgov, lahko natančna opredelitev zadevnega trga ostane odprta za namene te odločbe, če se številne storitve, navedene v zahtevi, ki jo je predložila Finska, obravnavajo v takšnem obsegu, da rezultat analize ostane enak ne glede na to, ali temelji na ozki ali širši opredelitvi.
This Decision is without prejudice to the application of the rules on competition.
Ta odločba ne posega v uporabo pravil o konkurenci.
Services not covered by Directive 2004/17/EC
Storitve, ki niso zajete v Direktivi 2004/17/ES
The Directive 2004/17/EC consequently does not apply to the provision of those services in Finland.
Glede na informacije, ki so na voljo Komisiji, da pogoj v zvezi s storitvami skladiščenja, tiskanja, upravljanja podatkov in elektronskega poslovanja na Finskem ni izpolnjen, se Direktiva 2004/17/ES zato ne uporablja za opravljanje teh storitev na Finskem.
Services to which Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC is not applicable
Storitve, za katere se člen 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES ne uporablja
Addressed letter services
Storitve naslovljene pisemske pošte
In respect of consumer letters (CtC and CtB addressed letter services, domestic and international), Finland Post has a market share of 100 %.
Finska pošta ima za pisemske pošiljke potrošnikov (storitve naslovljenih pisemskih pošiljk od potrošnika do potrošnika in od potrošnika do podjetij v domovini in tujini) 100 % tržni delež.
For business letters, its estimated market share varies between 85 % (for BtB addressed letter services, domestic and international) and 95 % (for BtC addressed letter services, domestic and international), with none of its competitors having obtained an estimated market share exceeding 10 %.
Za poslovne pisemske pošiljke se ocenjuje, da se tržni delež giblje med 85 % (za medpodjetniške storitve naslovljenih pisemskih pošiljk v domovini in tujini) in 95 % (za storitve naslovljenih pisemskih pošiljk od podjetij do potrošnika v domovini in tujini), pri čemer ni noben izmed konkurentov Finske pošte dosegel tržnega deleža, ki naj bi po ocenah presegal 10 %.
According to the available information, Finland Post's market shares for international addressed letter services (inbound and outbound letters) are the same as for purely domestic services.
Glede na razpoložljive informacije so tržni deleži Finske pošte za mednarodne storitve naslovljenih pisemskih pošiljk (dohodne in odhodne pisemske pošiljke) enaki kot za izključno domače storitve.
According to the Finnish authorities, those services are directly exposed to competition, first because of competitive pressure from the possibility to substitute ‘traditional’ paper-based letter services with electronic means of communication (such as e-mail or SMS) and, second, because the existing unrestricted access to the market exposes it to potential competition from possible newcomers.
Po mnenju finskih organov so te storitve neposredno izpostavljene konkurenci, prvič zaradi konkurenčnega pritiska možnosti nadomestitve storitev „tradicionalnih“ papirnih pisemskih pošiljk z elektronskimi komunikacijskimi sredstvi (kot je elektronska pošta ali SMS) in drugič, ker jih obstoječi neomejen dostop do trga izpostavlja potencialni konkurenci novincev.
In respect of substitution, it should be noted that according to EC competition rules, substitutability should be analysed, inter alia, on the basis of product characteristics, price of the products and barriers associated with the switching of demand to potential substitutes.
V zvezi z nadomestitvijo je treba opozoriti, da je treba v skladu s pravili o konkurenci ES nadomestljivost med drugim analizirati na podlagi značilnosti proizvodov, cene proizvodov in ovir, povezanih s preusmeritvijo povpraševanja na možne nadomestke.
It appears that the characteristics of paper-based mail and of electronic communications differ significantly and that there is a significant barrier to switching between paper-based mail and electronic mail [3].
Zdi se, da se značilnosti papirne pošte in elektronskih komunikacij znatno razlikujejo ter da obstaja velika ovira za prehod s papirne pošte na elektronsko pošto [3].
This indicates that electronic communications belong to a different product market and therefore they cannot exercise a direct competitive restraint on Finland Post ' s addressed letter services.
To kaže, da elektronske komunikacije pripadajo različnemu proizvodnemu trgu in zato ne morejo izvajati neposrednega konkurenčnega omejevanja storitev naslovljenih poštnih pošiljk Finska pošte.
Furthermore, it would seem that the main effect of the increased use of electronic mail would substantially reduce the overall size of the paper-based mail market, rather than introduce competition within it.
Poleg tega se zdi, da bi glavni učinek povečane uporabe elektronske pošte znatno zmanjšal celoten obseg trga papirne pošte, namesto da bi na njem uvedel konkurenco.
For example, according to the information supplied, the response by Finland Post to an increased marketing of e-invoicing by Finland ' s banks was to offer its own electronic services and not take any initiative concerning ‘traditional’, paper-based communications.
Finska pošta se je na primer glede na posredovane informacije na povečano trženje elektronskega izdajanja računov s strani finskih bank odzvala s ponudbo lastnih elektronskih storitev in ni prevzela nobene pobude v zvezi s „tradicionalnimi“ papirnimi komunikacijami.
Second, as to the potential competition, it is significant that the entire postal sector has been opened to competition since 1994 and that this has until now only resulted in competitors gaining an aggregate estimated market share of just 15 % even in the most readily competitive segment (BtB addressed letter services, domestic and international).
Drugič, glede potencialne konkurence je pomembno, da je bil celotni poštni sektor odprt za konkurenco od leta 1994 in da je to do danes vodilo zgolj k doseganju samo 15 % skupnega ocenjenega tržnega deleža celo v najbolj konkurenčnem segmentu (medpodjetniške storitve naslovljenih poštnih pošiljk v domovini in tujini).
As a result, there is no indication that the potential competition will play any significant role in the foreseeable future.
Zato nič ne kaže na to, da bo potencialna konkurenca v bližnji prihodnosti imela pomembno vlogo.
Consistent with conclusions of the independent national authority, Kilpailuvirasto/Konkurrensverket (the Finnish Competition Authority), it should be concluded that the services examined in this recital are not directly exposed to competition in Finland.
Skladno z zaključki neodvisnega nacionalnega organa, Kilpailuvirasto/Konkurrensverket (finski organ za konkurenco), je treba zaključiti, da storitve, preučene v tej uvodni izjavi, niso neposredno izpostavljene konkurenci na Finskem.
Therefore Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC does not apply to contracts intended to enable the pursuit of those activities in Finland.
Zato se člen 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES ne uporablja za naročila, katerih namen je omogočanje izvajanja teh dejavnosti na Finskem.
Addressed direct mail services
Storitve naslovljene direktne pošte
In respect of addressed direct mail which for the purposes of this Decision means addressed deliveries intended as marketing communications, Finland Post has an estimated market share of 90 % with none of its competitors having obtained a market share estimated to exceed 10 %.
Finska pošta ima za naslovljeno direktno pošto, ki v tej odločbi pomeni naslovljene pošiljke, predvidene kot tržne komunikacije, 90 % ocenjeni tržni delež, pri čemer noben izmed njenih konkurentov ni dosegel tržnega deleža, ki naj bi po ocenah presegal 10 %.
In view of this high level of concentration on this market and in the absence of any other indicators to the contrary, it should be concluded that addressed direct mail services are not directly exposed to competition in Finland.
Glede na to visoko stopnjo koncentracije na tem trgu in ob pomanjkanju kakršnih koli drugih nasprotnih kazalcev je treba zaključiti, da storitve naslovljene direktne pošte niso neposredno izpostavljene konkurenci na Finskem.
Therefore Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC does not apply to contracts intended to enable the pursuit of that activity in Finland.
Zato se člen 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES ne uporablja za naročila, katerih namen je omogočanje izvajanja te dejavnosti na Finskem.
Consumer standard parcel services (CtC and CtB), domestic and international
Storitve standardne paketne pošte (od potrošnika do potrošnika in od potrošnika do podjetij) v domovini in tujini
In respect of these services, Finland Post's position is quite strong with an estimated market share of 80 % [4].
Pri teh storitvah je položaj Finske pošte precej močan z 80 % ocenjenim tržnim deležem [4].
The market share of the biggest (and only significant) competitor of Finland Post covers virtually the remaining 20 % [5].
Tržni delež največjega (in edinega pomembnega) konkurenta Finske pošte pokriva praktično preostalih 20 % [5].
Consistent with the conclusions of the Finnish competition authority, it should be concluded that the category of services examined is not directly exposed to competition in Finland.
Skladno z zaključki finskega organa za konkurenco je treba zaključiti, da kategorija preučenih storitev ni neposredno izpostavljena konkurenci na Finskem.
Early delivery of newspapers
Zgodnja dostava časopisa