natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Bearing in mind that the measures in force did not considerably affect importers, it is concluded that maintaining the existing anti-dumping measures against imports originating in India, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan would not have a significant negative effect on the situation of the importers in the Community.
Ob upoštevanju, da veljavni ukrepi niso znatno prizadeli uvoznikov, se sklene, da ohranitev obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov proti uvozu s poreklom iz Indije, Indonezije, Tajske, Malezije, Republike Koreje in Tajvana ne bi imela pomembnega negativnega učinka na položaj uvoznikov v Skupnosti.
Interest of converters/users
Interes predelovalcev/uporabnikov
The Commission sent questionnaires to 47 known converters/users.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike 47 znanim predelovalcem/uporabnikom.
Only 10 converters/users with an overall low representativity replied to the questionnaire.
Le deset predelovalcev/uporabnikov z na splošno majhno reprezentativnostjo jih je izpolnilo na vprašalnik.
According to the information on purchases supplied in their responses to the questionnaire, cooperating converters/users during the RIP represent about 20 % of total Community consumption of PET.
V skladu z informacijami o nabavah, dobljenih iz izpolnjenih vprašalnikov, so sodelujoči predelovalci/uporabniki med OPP predstavljali približno 20 % celotne potrošnje PET v Skupnosti.
They purchased during the RIP 95 % of their PET from Community producers and the remainder from imports originating in countries other than those subject to these reviews.
V OPP so nabavili 95 % svojih PET od proizvajalcev iz Skupnosti, preostanek pa iz uvoza s poreklom iz drugih držav, ki niso bile zajete v teh pregledih.
A number of arguments against the imposition of duties were presented.
Predstavljeni so bili številni argumenti proti uvedbi dajatev.
Five converters (transforming PET chips in pre-forms and bottle grade and representing 10 % of the consumption) replied to the questionnaire.
Vprašalnike je izpolnilo pet predelovalcev (ki predelujejo PET v zrncih v predoblike in obliko steklenic in predstavljajo 10 % potrošnje).
The cost of PET chips accounts for 55 % of their final product (mostly pre-forms).
Cena PET v zrncih predstavlja 55 % njihovega končnega izdelka (v glavnem predoblik).
It has been established that they import negligible quantities from the countries concerned and other third countries.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so iz zadevnih držav in drugih tretjih držav uvozili zanemarljive količine.
Nevertheless they oppose the imposition of duties claiming that the prolongation of the measures could have the effect of artificially raising the prices in Europe.
Kljub temu so nasprotovali uvedbi dajatev in trdili, da bi podaljšanje ukrepov lahko imelo učinek umetnega dvigovanja cen v Evropi.
Five users accounting for about 10 % of the consumption supplied rather incomplete data.
Pet uporabnikov, ki je predstavljalo približno 10 % potrošnje, je predložilo razmeroma nepopolne podatke.
The low level of cooperation from the big users is likely to be due to the fact that the last investigation concerning imports from PRC, Australia and Pakistan took place only two years ago.
Vzrok za nizko raven sodelovanja velikih uporabnikov je verjetno dejstvo, da je bila zadnja preiskava v zvezi z uvozom iz LRK, Avstralije in Pakistana komaj pred dvema letoma.
PET costs account for around 6/7 % of the overall cost and are therefore rather limited.
Stroški PET znašajo približno 6/7 % skupnih stroškov in so zato precej omejeni.
Although they have declared no imports from the countries concerned, similarly as the converters, they oppose the imposition of duties claiming that the measures could have the effect of artificially raising the prices in Europe.
Čeprav niso prijavili nobenega uvoza iz zadevnih držav, podobno kot predelovalci, nasprotujejo uvedbi dajatev in trdijo, da bi ukrepi lahko imeli učinek umetnega dvigovanja cen v Evropi.
Considering the rather good financial situation of the downstream industry, in contrast to the one of the Community industry, no converter/user put forward the argument that maintaining the current duties could lead to a loss of jobs or to moving manufacturing facilities overseas.
Ob upoštevanju precej dobrega finančnega stanja industrije nadaljnje predelave v nasprotju s stanjem industrije Skupnosti, ni noben predelovalec/uporabnik predložil argumenta, da bi ohranjanje sedanjih dajatev lahko pripeljalo do izgube delovnih mest ali selitve proizvodnih zmogljivosti v čezmorska območja.
Furthermore, in terms of output, the Community industry adapted its size to match the increased consumption and therefore it is very likely that the unused capacity of the Community industry could fully cover the amount of the imports.
Poleg tega je industrija Skupnosti prilagodila svojo velikost proizvodnji, da bi se ujemala s povečano potrošnjo, zato je zelo verjetno, da bi neizkoriščena zmogljivost industrije Skupnosti lahko v celoti pokrila količino iz uvoza.
Bearing in mind that there are still alternative sources of supply with no anti-dumping measures, i.e. Mexico, Turkey, USA, Brazil, Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia the Community users would moreover be able to rely on (or to switch to) diversified suppliers of the product concerned.
Ob upoštevanju, da še vedno obstajajo alternativni viri dobave brez protidampinških ukrepov, to so Mehika, Turčija, ZDA, Brazilija, Pakistan, Iran in Savdska Arabija, se uporabniki Skupnosti lahko poleg tega zanašajo (ali preusmerijo) na različne dobavitelje zadevnega izdelka.
As concerns the performance of the user industry, the investigation has shown that during the period considered, the cooperating users increased their turnover, maintained employment stable and rather improved their overall profitability.
Preiskava je v zvezi s poslovanjem uporabniške industrije pokazala, da so sodelujoči uporabniki v obravnavanem obdobju povečali svoj promet, ohranili stabilno zaposlenost in precej izboljšali svojo skupno dobičkonosnost.
Therefore it was found that they were not negatively affected by the anti-dumping measures.
Zato je bilo ugotovljeno, da protidampinški ukrepi niso negativno vplivali nanje.
On the basis of the above, it is concluded that maintaining the existing anti-dumping measures against imports originating in India, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan would not have a significant negative effect on the situation of the users in the Community.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega se sklene, da ohranitev obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov proti uvozu s poreklom iz Indije, Indonezije, Tajske, Malezije, Republike Koreje in Tajvana ne bi znatno negativno vplivala na stanje uporabnikov v Skupnosti.
The suppliers of raw material (mono ethylene glycol (MEG)) and purified terephthalic acid (PTA), DMT and isophthalic acid (IPA), all petrochemical products derivatives of naphtha, clearly indicated their support for the measures.
Dobavitelji surovine (monoetilen glikola (MEG) in prečiščene tereftalne kisline (PTA), DMT in izoftalne kisline (IPA), vseh petrokemičnih izdelkov, derivatov primarnega bencina) so jasno navedli svojo podporo ukrepom.
They would benefit from the fact that the Community industry would very likely be able to recover from the effects of dumping and thus improve their performance.
Koristilo jim bi dejstvo, da bi se bila industrija Skupnosti zelo verjetno sposobna opomoči od učinkov dampinga in tako izboljšati svoje poslovanje.
Taking into account all of the factors outlined above, it is concluded that there are no compelling reasons against the maintenance of the current anti-dumping measures.
Ob upoštevanju vseh dejavnikov navedenih zgoraj se sklene, da ni utemeljenih razlogov proti ohranitvi obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov.
RELATION BETWEEN ANTI-DUMPING AND COUNTERVAILING MEASURES
RAZMERJE MED PROTIDAMPINŠKIMI IN IZRAVNALNIMI UKREPI
For one export country, namely India, a parallel investigation on the expiry of countervailing measures has been carried out (see recital 10).
Za eno državo izvoznico, in sicer Indijo, je bila izvedena vzporedna preiskava o izteku izravnalnih ukrepov (glej uvodno izjavo (10)).
This investigation confirmed the necessity to continue the application of such measures at unchanged levels.
Preiskava je potrdila nujnost nadaljevanja uporabe takih ukrepov brez uvedbe sprememb.
The present investigation also concluded that anti-dumping measures on exports from India should be kept in force at unchanged levels.
Tudi s sedanjo preiskavo je bilo sklenjeno, da morajo protidampinški ukrepi za izvoz iz Indije še naprej veljati brez uvedbe sprememb.
In that respect, reference is made to recital 125 of Regulation (EC) No 2604/2000.
V tem smislu se sklicuje na uvodno izjavo (125) Uredbe (ES) št. 2604/2000.
As the measures currently proposed for exports of PET from India remain unchanged, it follows that Article 14(1) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 24(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 are complied with.
Ker ostajajo sedaj predlagani ukrepi za izvoz PET iz Indije nespremenjeni, so izpolnjene zahteve iz člena 14(1) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in člen 24(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 2026/97.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend that the existing measures be maintained respectively their levels be amended where warranted.
Vse stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je bil predviden predlog za ohranitev obstoječih ukrepov oziroma za njihovo spremembo, kjer je to upravičeno.
They were also granted a period to submit comments and claims subsequent to disclosure.
Odobreno jim je bilo tudi obdobje za predložitev pripomb in zahtevkov po razkritju.
In particular one Indian exporter alleged that in the absence of measures it is not likely that India will re-direct sales to the Community.
Zlasti en indijski izvoznik je trdil, da v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov ne obstaja verjetnost, da bo Indija preusmerila prodajo v Skupnost.
This exporter claimed that emerging markets are more attractive than the Community, that Indian demand is growing fast and that, therefore, no spare capacity is available.
Ta izvoznik je še trdil, da so nastajajoči trgi privlačnejši od Skupnosti in da se povpraševanje na indijskem trgu hitro povečuje in zato ni na voljo prostih zmogljivosti.
It is however to be considered that, notwithstanding an increase of the demand in the Indian market, the investigation at company level indicated spare capacities, in excess of the increase in demand on the Indian market, as also confirmed by the market intelligence report mentioned at recital 74.
Vendar je treba upoštevati, da je ne glede na povečanje povpraševanja na indijskem trgu preiskava na ravni družbe pokazala, da obstajajo proste zmogljivosti, ki presegajo povečanje povpraševanja na indijskem trgu, kar je potrdilo tudi poročilo o tržnih informacijah iz uvodne izjave (74).
It is therefore concluded that none of the disclosure comments received were such as to alter the conclusions as contained in this regulation.
Zato se sklene, da nobena od prejetih pripomb ni mogla spremeniti sklepov iz te uredbe.
It follows from the above that the anti-dumping duties are maintained respectively, their levels are amended where warranted,
Iz zgoraj navedenega sledi, da se protidampinške dajatve ohranijo, njihova raven pa se spremeni, kjer je to upravičeno –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of polyethylene terephthalate having a viscosity number of 78 ml/g or higher, according to the ISO Standard 1628-5, falling within CN code 39076020 and originating in India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan and Thailand.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz polietilen teraftalata z viskoznostjo 78 ml/g ali več v skladu s standardom ISO 1628-5, ki se uvršča pod oznako KN 39076020, s poreklom iz Indije, Indonezije, Malezije, Republike Koreje, Tajvana in Tajske.
Except as provided for in Article 2, the rate of the anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community frontier price, before duty for products manufactured by the companies listed below shall be as follows:
Razen v primerih iz člena 2, je stopnja protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti, pred plačilom dajatve, za izdelke, ki jih proizvajajo spodaj naveden družbe, kot sledi:
In cases where goods have been damaged before entry into free circulation and, therefore, the price actually paid or payable is apportioned for the determination of the customs value pursuant to Article 145 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code [10], the amount of anti-dumping duty, calculated on the basis of the amounts set above, shall be reduced by a percentage which corresponds to the apportioning of the price actually paid or payable.
V primerih, ko se blago poškoduje pred vstopom v prosti promet in se zato cena, ki se dejansko plačuje ali se je plačevala, za določitev carinske vrednosti porazdeli v skladu s členom 145 Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 z dne 2. julija 1993 o določbah za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [10], se znesek protidampinške dajatve, izračunan na podlagi zgoraj navedenih zneskov, zmanjša za odstotek, ki ustreza porazdelitvi cene, ki se dejansko plačuje ali se je plačevala.
Notwithstanding paragraphs 1 and 2, the definitive anti-dumping duty shall not apply to imports released for free circulation in accordance with Article 2.
Ne glede na odstavka 1 in 2 se dokončna protidampinška dajatev ne uporablja za uvoz, sproščen v prosti promet v skladu s členom 2.
Imports shall be exempt from the anti-dumping duties imposed by Article 1 provided that they are produced and directly exported (i.e. invoiced and shipped) to a company acting as an importer in the Community by the companies mentioned in paragraph 3, declared under the appropriate TARIC additional code and that the conditions set out in paragraph 2 are met.
Uvoz blaga je oproščen protidampinške dajatve, uvedene s členom 1, če so ga izdelale in neposredno izvozile (tj. zaračunale in odpremile) družbe iz odstavka 3 družbi, ki je uvoznik v Skupnosti, če je prijavljeno pod ustrezno dodatno oznako TARIC in so izpolnjeni pogoji iz odstavka 2.
When the request for release for free circulation is presented, exemption from the duties shall be conditional upon presentation to the customs service of the Member State concerned of a valid ‘Undertaking Invoice’ issued by the exporting companies mentioned in paragraph 3, containing the essential elements listed in the Annex.
Pri predložitvi zahtevka za sprostitev v prosti promet je treba za oprostitev plačila dajatev carinskemu organu zadevne države članice predložiti veljaven „račun na podlagi zaveze“, ki ga izda izvozna družba iz odstavka 3 in vsebuje bistvene elemente iz Priloge.
Exemption from the duty shall further be conditional on the goods declared and presented to customs corresponding precisely to the description on the Undertaking Invoice.
Oprostitev plačila dajatev je še dodatno odvisna od tega, ali prijavljeno blago, predloženo carinskim organom, točno ustreza opisu iz „računa na podlagi zaveze“.
Imports accompanied by an Undertaking Invoice shall be declared under the following TARIC additional codes:
Uvoz, ki ga spremlja „račun na podlagi zaveze“, se prijavi pod naslednjimi dodatnimi oznakami TARIC:
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1646/2005 (OJ L 266, 11.10.2005, p. 10).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1646/2005 (UL L 266, 11.10.2005, str. 10).
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2167/2005 (OJ L 345, 28.12.2005, p. 11).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 2167/2005 (UL L 345, 28.12.2005, str. 11).
OJ C 52, 2.3.2005, p. 2.
UL C 52, 2.3.2005, str. 2.
OJ C 304, 1.12.2005, p. 9.
UL C 304, 1.12.2005, str. 9.
OJ C 129, 2.6.2006, p. 23.
UL C 129, 2.6.2006, str. 23.
Regulation (EC) No 2604/2000, recital 125, and Regulation (EC) No 496/2002 (OJ L 78, 21.3.2002, p. 4), recital 19.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2604/2000, uvodna izjava 125, in Uredba (ES) št. 496/2002 (UL L 78, 21.3.2002, str. 4), uvodna izjava (19).
OJ L 19, 21.1.2005, p. 6, recital 58.
UL L 19, 21.1.2005, str. 6, uvodna izjava 58.
Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1875/2006 (OJ L 360, 19.12.2006, p. 64).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1875/2006 (UL L 360, 19.12.2006, str. 64).
Elements to be indicated in the Undertaking Invoice referred to in Article 2(2):
Elementi, ki jih je treba navesti v računu na podlagi zaveze iz člena 2(2):
The Undertaking Invoice number.
Številka računa na podlagi zaveze.
The TARIC additional code under which the goods on the invoice may be customs-cleared at Community borders (as specified in the Regulation).
Dodatna oznaka TARIC, po kateri je mogoče blago na računu na podlagi zaveze cariniti na mejah Skupnosti (kakor je opredeljeno v uredbi).
The exact description of the goods, including:
Točen opis blaga, ki vključuje:
the product reporting code number (PRC) (as established in the undertaking offered by the producing exporter in question),
številčno oznako izdelka (PRC) (kakor je določena v zavezi, ki jo je ponudil zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik),
quantity (to be given in units).
količino (navedeno v enotah).
The description of the terms of the sale, including:
Opis pogojev prodaje, ki vključuje:
price per unit,
ceno na enoto,
the applicable payment terms,
veljavne plačilne pogoje,
the applicable delivery terms,
veljavne pogoje dobave,
total discounts and rebates.
skupne popuste in rabate.
Name of the company acting as an importer to which the invoice is issued directly by the company.
Ime družbe, ki je uvoznik, kateremu družba neposredno izda račun.
The name of the official of the company that has issued the undertaking invoice and the following signed declaration:
Ime uslužbenca družbe, ki je izdal račun na podlagi zaveze in naslednjo podpisano izjavo:
‘I, the undersigned, certify that the sale for direct export to the European Community of the goods covered by this invoice is being made within the scope and under the terms of the undertaking offered by … (name of company), and accepted by the European Commission through Decision 2000/745/EC.
„Podpisani potrjujem, da se prodaja blaga za neposredni izvoz v Evropsko skupnost, ki ga zajema ta račun, izvaja v obsegu in pod pogoji zaveze, ki jo daje … [ime družbe] in jo je potrdila Evropska komisija s Sklepom 2000/745/ES.
I declare that the information provided in this invoice is complete and correct.’
Izjavljam, da so informacije, ki jih vsebuje ta račun, popolne in pravilne.“.
According to the request, there are ten producers in the Republic of Korea which have the capacity to produce PET. Out of these ten producers, five (including Daehan Synthetic Fiber Co. Ltd) made themselves known to the Commission and submitted questionnaire replies to the Commission.
Glede na zahtevek je v Republiki Koreji deset proizvajalcev, ki imajo zmogljivost za proizvodnjo PET. Od teh desetih proizvajalcev se jih je pet (vključno z družbo Daehan Synthetic Fiber Co Ltd) javilo Komisiji in predložilo izpolnjene vprašalnike.
Mitsubishi Chemical Indonesia
Mitsubishi Chemical Indonezija
The investigation established that there were five producers of PET in Indonesia during the RIP. As mentioned in recital 16, three companies submitted completed questionnaire responses but only two companies accepted verification visits at their premises.
S preiskavo je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bilo med OPP v Indoneziji pet proizvajalcev PET. Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (16) zgoraj, so tri družbe predložile izpolnjene vprašalnike, vendar sta le dve družbi sprejeli preveritveni obisk v svojih prostorih.
Two Malaysian PET producers cooperated in the investigation. Only one of them had exports to the Community, representing 100 % of the total Malaysian exports of PET to the Community.
V preiskavi sta sodelovala dva malezijska proizvajalca PET. Le eden od njiju je izvažal v Skupnost in je predstavljal 100 % celotnega malezijskega izvoza PET v Skupnost.
Overall, market intelligence data suggests that the domestic market in Thailand can absorb less than 94000 tonnes or 25 % of the domestic production of PET. Under these circumstances, Thai producers of the product concerned are heavily dependent on export sales for the continuation of operation at current capacity.
V celoti podatki o tržnih informacijah kažejo, da bi lahko domači trg na Tajskem absorbiral manj kot 94000 ton ali 25 % domače proizvodnje PET. V teh okoliščinah so tajski proizvajalci zadevnega izdelka za nadaljevanje poslovanja s sedanjo zmogljivostjo močno odvisni od izvoza.
This was principally due to the fact that the increase in the price of raw materials was higher than the increase of PET prices. In addition, the Community industry had to face the pressure from imports.
To je bilo v glavnem zaradi dejstva, da je bilo povišanje cen surovin večje kakor povišanje cen PET. Poleg tega se je industrija Skupnosti morala soočiti s pritiskom uvoza.
PTA
PTA
MEG
MEG
Moreover, most likely, imports from USA are Pet G, a special variety of PET having higher viscosity requirements and sold on average at 50 % more than normal PET. Imports prices for Pakistan were lower than the average prices of the Community industry from 2002 to 2004.
Poleg tega je bil uvoz iz ZDA najverjetneje PET G, posebna različica PET, ki ima višje zahteve glede viskoznosti in se povprečno prodaja za 50 % več kot normalni PET. Cene uvoza iz Pakistana so bile nižje od povprečnih cen industrije Skupnosti od leta 2002 do leta 2004.
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 192/2007 of 22 February 2007 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Republic of Korea, Thailand and Taiwan following an expiry review and a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(2) and Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96
Popravek Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 192/2007 z dne 22. februarja 2007 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz določenega polietilen tereftalata s poreklom iz Indije, Indonezije, Malezije, Republike Koreje, Tajske in Tajvana po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov in delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(2) in 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96
(Official Journal of the European Union L 59 of 27 February 2007)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 59 z dne 27. februarja 2007)
On page 30, Article 1(2), list of companies, second mention of the Republic of Korea:
Stran 30, člen 1(2), seznam družb, drugi sklic na Republiko Korejo:
Council Regulation (EC) No 193/2007
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 193/2007
imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating in India following an expiry review pursuant to Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 2026/97
o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve na uvoz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 18 Uredbe (ES) št. 2026/97
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Article 18 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2026/97 z dne 6. oktobra 1997 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske Skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“) in zlasti člena 18 Uredbe,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [2], and in particular, Article 14(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [2] in zlasti člena 14(1) Uredbe,