natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The main end-uses are in the following groups of products: household (furniture, mattresses, pillows), automotive (carpets, filters), hygienic personal care (nappies, absorbents), apparel (insulation).
Glavna uporaba je v naslednjih skupinah izdelkov: za gospodinjstvo (pohištvo, žimnice, blazine), avtomobile (predpražniki, filtri), osebno higieno (plenice, vložki), oblačila (izolacija).
In all its applications, LMP is mixed and melted with other PSF fibres and it usually represents around 15 % of the volume in such blends.
V vseh materialih je PNT mešan in staljen z drugimi vlakni RVP in navadno obsega okoli 15 % v takih mešanicah.
Some Community users argued that only in normal thermally bonded wadding for furniture and bedding end-uses LMP represents around 15 % in the blend.
Nekateri uporabniki iz Skupnosti so trdili, da obsega PNT 15 % mešanice samo v običajnih toplotno vezanih podlogah za uporabo v pohištvu in posteljnini.
In certain other applications, such as acquisition distribution layers, the blend ratio varies from 35 % to 50 % of LMP and in air filtration applications LMP represents up to 70 % in the blend.
V nekaterih drugih materialih, kot so vpojne plasti, je delež PNT v mešanici od 35 % do 50 %, pri filtrih pa do 70 % mešanice.
In this respect, it should be added that in some other applications, such as for instance apparel insulation wadding, LMP represents less than 15 % in the blend.
V zvezi s tem je treba dodati, da v nekaterih drugih materialih, kot so podloge za izolacijo oblačil, PNT obsega manj kakor 15 % mešanice.
The review investigation has shown that the LMP's relative volume in its different end applications indeed varies, but it is in the vast majority of applications a minority component (overall on average around 15 %) as compared to other PSF types blended in these products.
Preiskava v zvezi s pregledom je pokazala, da se delež PNT v različnih materialih zares razlikuje, vendar je v veliki večini od njih drugotna sestavina (na splošno v povprečju okrog 15 %) v primerjavi z drugimi vrstami RVP, vmešanimi v te izdelke.
The assessment made in recital 29 is therefore confirmed.
Ocena iz uvodne izjave 29 se zato potrdi.
The main users of LMP in the Community are non-woven application industries.
Glavni uporabniki PNT v Skupnosti je industrija, ki izdeluje netkane materiale.
These companies typically use a whole range of other PSF types belonging to the non-woven family.
Ta podjetja navadno uporabljajo ves spekter drugih netkanih vrst RVP.
There are no specific users of LMP in the Community.
Posebnih uporabnikov PNT v Skupnosti ni.
It was also found that there is no substantial difference in distribution channels of LMP and other types of PSF.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da ni bistvene razlike v distribucijskih poteh za PNT in druge vrste RVP.
It is recalled that LMP is always used mixed with other PSF types.
Spomnimo naj, da se PNT vedno uporablja v mešanicah z drugimi vrstami RVP.
One exporting producer argued that the fact that the same users use LMP and other types of PSF and that the distribution channels of LMP and other types of PSF are basically the same does not entail that LMP and other types of PSF are ‘like products’.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da dejstvo, da isti uporabniki uporabljajo PNT in druge vrste RVP ter da so distribucijske poti PNT in drugih vrst RVP tako rekoč iste, še ne pomeni, da so PNT in druge vrste RVP „podobni izdelki“.
Indeed, this fact by itself does not entail that LMP and other PSF types should be considered as being one single product; however, it shows that no differences exist between LMP and other PSF types as far as their distribution is concerned.
To dejstvo samo po sebi dejansko ne pomeni, da je treba PNT in druge vrste RVP obravnavati kot en izdelek, vendar kaže, da pri distribuciji ni nikakršnih razlik med PNT in drugimi vrstami RVP.
In other words, from a distribution point of view, no grounds exist for the exclusion of LMP from the scope of the measures.
Povedano drugače, s stališča distribucije ni razlogov za izvzetje PNT iz obsega ukrepov.
In addition, as it was demonstrated in recital 29, LMP has the same end-uses as other PSF types, since it can only be used in blend with these fibres.
Kot je bilo poleg tega dokazano v uvodni izjavi 29, je uporaba PNT enaka kot pri drugih vrstah RVP, saj se lahko uporablja samo v mešanici s temi vlakni.
The argument is therefore rejected.
Trditev se torej zavrne.
In view of the above, it is concluded that LMP and other PSF types have the same basic end-uses and they are distributed via the same channels.
Glede na navedeno je ugotovljeno, da imajo PNT in druge vrste RVP enako osnovno uporabo in se distribuirajo po istih poteh.
Interchangeability
Zamenljivost
As shown above, although LMP has no different basic physical and chemical characteristics than other PSF types, it has certain distinct properties.
Kakor je navedeno zgoraj, ima PNT nekatere lastne lastnosti, čeprav se po osnovnih fizikalnih in kemijskih lastnostih ne razlikuje od drugih vrst RVP.
However, in numerous applications LMP can be substituted by other types of PSF using different bonding technologies, such as resin bonding of PSF or thermo bonding of PSF with the use of other melt bonding fibres.
Vendar pa se v številnih materialih PNT lahko zamenja z drugimi vrstami RVP z uporabo različnih tehnologij vezave, kot je vezanje RVP s smolo ali toplotna vezava RVP z uporabo drugih vlaken, ki se vežejo s taljenjem.
It is thus substantially interchangeable with other PSF types.
Je torej precej zamenljiv z drugimi vrstami RVP.
Some parties challenged the aforesaid conclusion in respect of the interchangeability of LMP with other PSF types.
Nekatere stranke so spodbijale navedeno ugotovitev v zvezi z zamenljivostjo PNT z drugimi vrstami RVP.
One exporting producer argued that since resin bonding and bonding with the use of other melt bonding fibres requires substitution of LMP by resin and bonding fibres not made of polyesters respectively, there is no interchangeability of LMP with other PSF types.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je utemeljeval, da PNT in druge vrste RVP niso zamenljivi, ker je pri vezavi s smolo in vezavi z uporabo drugih vlaken, ki se pri vezavi stalijo, potrebna zamenjava PNT s smolo in vlakni za vezavo, ki niso izdelana iz poliestra.
Some Community users argued that the use of other bonding technologies referred to above would result in different properties of certain end-products and, for this reason, in certain applications such substitution is not possible.
Nekateri uporabniki iz Skupnosti so trdili, da bi uporaba drugih tehnologij vezave, navedenih zgoraj, prinesla drugačne lastnosti nekaterih končnih izdelkov, zato v nekaterih materialih taka zamenjava ni mogoča.
These arguments were further examined.
Te utemeljitve so bile dodatno preučene.
The investigation has shown that although different bonding technologies are not always interchangeable with each other in all end-applications, certain interchangeability exists and, thus, LMP is in competition with resin bonded PSF and with PSF bonded with other than core/sheath bonding fibres for certain applications.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je, čeprav drugačne tehnologije vezave niso vedno medsebojno zamenljive pri vseh materialih, možna določena zamenljivost in zato je PNT v nekaterih materialih konkurenčen RVP, vezanim s smolo, in RVP, vezanim drugače kot z vlakni, pri katerih se vežeta jedro in plašč.
Thus, it cannot be generally concluded that no substitutes to LMP exist and that it is not interchangeable with certain other PSF types.
Zato na splošno ni mogoče sklepati, da ne obstajajo zamenjave za PNT in da ta ni zamenljiv z nekaterimi drugimi vrstami RVP.
One exporting producer also noted that its argument concerning the threat to the environment and to the health of workers posed by certain chemical resins was not properly examined.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je pripomnil tudi, da njegova trditev v zvezi z ogroženostjo okolja in zdravja delavcev zaradi nekaterih kemičnih smol, ni bila ustrezno preučena.
In this respect, it is noted that such argument is not relevant in this particular case, since in certain applications resin bonding cannot be substituted by other bonding technologies and, in any event, resin bonding must comply with any environmental requirements in the Community and its Member States.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da se take trditve v tem primeru ne da upoštevati, ker v nekaterih materialih vezave s smolo ni mogoče zamenjati z drugimi tehnologijami vezave, v vsakem primeru pa mora vezava s smolo izpolnjevati okoljske zahteve v Skupnosti in njenih državah članicah.
Distinction between LMP and other types of PSF
Razlikovanje med PNT in drugimi vrstami RVP
There is no visual and tangible difference between LMP and other PSF types.
Med PNT in drugimi vrstami RVP ni vidne in oprijemljive razlike.
The cross-section of LMP is different from that of mono-component fibres; however, it is not always different from the cross-section of other bi-component PSF types.
Prerez PNT je drugačen kot pri enokomponentnih vlaknih, vendar pa ni vedno drugačen od prereza drugih dvokomponentnih vrst RVP.
It is recalled that LMP exists in numerous variants having, for instance, different melting temperatures.
Spomnimo naj, da PNT obstaja v številnih različicah, ki imajo na primer različne temperature taljenja.
Thus, a clear distinction on the basis of melting temperature is not possible.
Tako ni mogoče jasno razlikovati na podlagi temperature taljenja.
Therefore, it appears that LMP cannot be easily distinguished from other PSF types and that any reliable identification of this product type would require the use of sophisticated equipment.
Zato se zdi, da PNT ni mogoče zlahka razlikovati od drugih vrst RVP in da bi bilo za zanesljivo opredelitev tega izdelka treba uporabiti izpopolnjeno opremo.
Some Community users disagreed with the above conclusion that LMP cannot be easily distinguished from other PSF types, in particular as far as its melting temperature is concerned.
Nekateri uporabniki iz Skupnosti se niso strinjali z zgornjo ugotovitvijo, da PNT ni mogoče zlahka razlikovati od drugih vrst RVP, zlasti kar zadeva temperaturo taljenja.
Thus, the conclusions drawn in recital 37 cannot be amended.
Tako ugotovitev iz uvodne izjave 37 ni mogoče spremeniti.
One exporting producer argued that the mere fact that LMP is visually similar to other PSF types cannot constitute a basis for non-excluding LMP from the scope of the measures.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da zgolj dejstvo, da je PNT po videzu podoben drugim vrstam RVP, ne more biti podlaga za neizvzetje PNT iz obsega ukrepov.
As explained in recital 23, although the ‘look’ by itself is normally not decisive for answering the question whether or not different product types should fall into a ‘single product’, it constitutes an additional element in the analysis (see also recital 16).
Kakor je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 36, čeprav „videz“ sam po sebi navadno ni odločilen pri odgovarjanju na vprašanje, ali bi se različne vrste izdelka morale obravnavati kot „en izdelek“, je to dodaten dejavnik pri analizi (glej tudi uvodno izjavo 16).
The fact that different product types cannot be easily distinguished from each other cannot be ignored.
Dejstva, da različnih vrst izdelkov ni mogoče zlahka razlikovati med seboj, ni mogoče zanemariti.
CONCLUSIONS ON THE PRODUCT SCOPE
SKLEPI O OBSEGU IZDELKA
The above findings show that LMP and other PSF types share the same basic physical and technical characteristics and have the same basic end-uses.
Zgornje ugotovitve kažejo, da imajo PNT in druge vrste RVP enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter enako osnovno uporabo.
In numerous applications, LMP directly or indirectly competes with other types of PSF on the Community market.
V številnih materialih PNT neposredno ali posredno konkurira drugim vrstam RVP na trgu Skupnosti.
On this basis, it is concluded that LMP and other types of PSF should be considered as one single product and that the partial interim review concerning the product scope for the application of the existing anti-dumping measures should be terminated.
Na podlagi tega je bilo sklenjeno, da bi bilo treba PNT in vrste RVP obravnavati kot en sam izdelek in zaključiti delni vmesni pregled v zvezi z obsegom izdelka pri uporabi obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov.
All interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the above conclusions were reached.
Vse zainteresirane stranke so bile seznanjene z bistvenimi dejstvi in premisleki, na podlagi katerih so bile sprejete zgornje sklepne ugotovitve.
Parties were granted a period within which they could make representations subsequent to this disclosure.
Določeno je bilo tudi obdobje, v katerem lahko stranke predložijo svoja stališča v zvezi s tem razkritjem.
The oral and written comments submitted by the parties were considered, but have not changed the conclusions not to amend the product scope of the anti-dumping measures on imports of PSF in force,
Preučene so bile ustne in pisne pripombe, ki so jih predložile stranke, vendar je sklep, da se obseg izdelka pri veljavnih protidampinških ukrepih o RVP ne spremeni, ostal nespremenjen –
The partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of the product scope of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of synthetic staple fibres of polyesters, falling within CN code 55032000, originating in the People's Republic of China, Saudi Arabia, Belarus and the Republic of Korea is hereby terminated without amending the anti-dumping measures in force.
Delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 v zvezi z obsegom izdelka protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz rezanih sintetičnih vlaken iz poliestra, ki se uvrščajo pod oznako KN 55032000, po poreklu iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, Saudove Arabije, Belorusije in Republike Koreje, se zaključi brez spremembe veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 428/2005 (OJ L 71, 17.3.2005, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 428/2005 (UL L 71, 17.3.2005, str. 1).
OJ C 174, 14.7.2005, p. 15; OJ C 323, 20.12.2005, p. 21.
UL C 174, 14.7.2005, str. 15; UL C 323, 20.12.2005, str. 21.
OJ C 325, 22.12.2005, p. 20.
UL C 325, 22.12.2005, str. 20.
As regards LMP, this review investigation revealed that no significant difference in production of LMP and other bi-component PSF types exists.
Kar zadeva PNT, je ta preiskava v zvezi s pregledom pokazala, da ni večjih razlik med proizvodnjo PNT in drugih dvokomponentnih vrst RVP.
It was found that any producer of other bi-component PSF types could easily switch to the production of LMP.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da bi kateri koli proizvajalec drugih dvokomponentnih vrst RVP zlahka prešel na proizvodnjo PNT.
It was argued that the melting point of the sheath component of LMP, although varying between 110 °C and 190 °C, would always be considerably lower than the melting point of other PSF types, which is allegedly around 255 °C. It is noted that the above range of melting temperatures confirms that LMP, as well as other PSF types, exist in numerous variants and that their identification is not always easily feasible.
Utemeljevali so, da je tališče plašča PNT, čeprav niha od 110 °C do 190 °C, vedno precej nižje od tališča drugih vrst RVP, ki je domnevno okrog 255 ° C. Opozoriti velja, da navedeni razpon temperatur taljenja potrjuje, da PNT tako kot druge vrste RVP obstaja v številnih različicah ter da ga ni vedno mogoče zlahka opredeliti.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 384/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 384/2007
This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 April 2007.
Ta uredba začne veljati 11. aprila 2007.
to Commission Regulation of 10 April 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 10. aprila 2007 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 385/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 385/2007
In view of the situation on the Community market for maize and of the changes in demand for cereals in various regions in recent weeks, new quantities of cereals held in intervention should be made available in some Member States.
Zaradi stanja na trgu koruze v Skupnosti ter sprememb v povpraševanju po žitih, ki so bile v zadnjih tednih ugotovljene v različnih regijah, je treba v nekaterih državah članicah dati na razpolago nove količine žit iz intervencijskih zalog.
The intervention agencies in the Member States concerned should therefore be authorised to increase the quantities put out to tender by 500000 tonnes of maize in Hungary.
Zato je treba intervencijskim agencijam zadevnih držav članic dovoliti povečanje količin v javnem razpisu do količine 500000 ton na Madžarskem za koruzo.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 204/2007 (OJ L 61, 28.2.2007, p. 5).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 204/2007 (UL L 61, 28.2.2007, str. 5).
Web site: www.birb.be
Spletna stran: www.birb.be
Fax (+359 2) 818 72 67
Telefaks: (+359 2) 818 72 67
Fax 1 (49-228) 68 45-3985
Telefaks 1: (49-228) 68 45-3985
Fax 2 (49-228) 68 45-3276
Telefaks 2: (49-228) 68 45-3276
Fax (372) 7371 201
Telefaks: (372) 7371 201
Fax (30) 210 212 47 91
Telefaks: (30) 210 212 47 91
Fax (34-91) 3474838
Telefaks: (34-91) 3474838
Fax (33) 144 18 20 08/80
Telefaks: (33) 144 18 20 08/80
Fax (371) 702 7892
Telefaks: (371) 702 7892
Fax (370-5) 268 5061
Telefaks: (370-5) 268 5061
Fax (31-475) 31 89 39
Telefaks: (31-475) 31 89 39
Tel. + 40 21 3054802, + 40 21 3054842
Telefon: + 40 21 3054802, + 40 21 3054842
Fax + 40 21 3054803
Telefaks: + 40 21 3054803
Fax (386-1) 478 92 00
Telefaks: (386-1) 478 92 00
Fax (421-2) 53 41 26 65
Telefaks: (421-2) 53 41 26 65
Fax (44) 191 226 5824
Telefaks: (44) 191 226 5824
E-mail: webmaster@birb.be
E-naslov: webmaster@birb.be
E-mail: dfz@dfz.bg
E-naslov: dfz@dfz.bg
E-mail: dagmar.hejrovska@szif.cz
E-naslov: dagmar.hejrovska@szif.cz
E-mail: mij@dffe.dk and pah@dffe.dk
E-naslov: mij@dffe.dk and pah@dffe.dk
E-mail: pflanzlErzeugnisse@ble.de
E-naslov: pflanzlErzeugnisse@ble.de
E-mail: ax17u073@minagric.gr
E-naslov: ax17u073@minagric.gr
E-mail: sgintervencion@fega.mapa.es
E-naslov: sgintervencion@fega.mapa.es
E-mail: f.abeasis@onigc.fr
E-naslov: f.abeasis@onigc.fr
E-mail: d.spampinato@agea.gov.it
E-naslov: d.spampinato@agea.gov.it
E-mail: lad@lad.gov.lv
E-naslov: lad@lad.gov.lv
E-mail: info@litfood.lt
E-naslov: info@litfood.lt
E-mail: ertekesites@mvh.gov.hu
E-naslov: ertekesites@mvh.gov.hu
E-mail: p.a.c.m.van.de.lindeloof@minlnv.nl
E-naslov: p.a.c.m.van.de.lindeloof@minlnv.nl
E-mail: referat10@ama.gv.at
E-naslov: referat10@ama.gv.at
E-mail: cereals-intervention@arr.gov.pl
E-naslov: cereals-intervention@arr.gov.pl
E-mail: aktrp@gov.si
E-naslov: aktrp@gov.si
E-mail: jvargova@apa.sk
E-naslov: jvargova@apa.sk
E-mail: intervention.unit@mmm.fi
E-naslov: intervention.unit@mmm.fi
E-mail: jordbruksverket@sjv.se
E-naslov: jordbruksverket@sjv.se
E-mail: cerealsintervention@rpa.gsi.gov.uk
E-naslov: cerealsintervention@rpa.gsi.gov.uk
Commission Regulation (EC) No 386/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 386/2007
amending and adapting Regulation (EC) No 990/2006 opening standing invitations to tender for the export of cereals held by the intervention agencies of the Member States
o spremembi in prilagoditvi Uredbe (ES) št. 990/2006 o odprtju stalnih javnih razpisov za izvoz žit iz zalog intervencijskih agencij držav članic
Following the accession of Bulgaria and Romania, Article 1(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 990/2006 [2] lapses as regards the exclusion of Bulgaria and Romania from the list of third countries towards which exports of cereals are destined, and should therefore be deleted.
Zaradi pristopa Bolgarije in Romunije je člen 1(2) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 990/2006 [2] postal zastarel v zvezi z izključitvijo Bolgarije in Romunije iz seznama tretjih držav, v katere se lahko izvaža žita, in je zato treba ti državi črtati.
Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 990/2006 contains entries in all Community languages.
Priloga III k Uredbi (ES) št. 990/2006 vsebuje navedbe v vseh jezikih Skupnosti.
The corresponding entries in Bulgarian, Irish, Maltese and Romanian should be added to that Annex.
Navedeno prilogo je treba dopolniti z navedbami v bolgarščini, irščini, malteščini in romunščini.
Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 990/2006 is hereby replaced by the following:
Člen 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 990/2006 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
For common wheat and rye, each invitation to tender shall cover a maximum quantity for export to third countries with the exception of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Liechtenstein, Montenegro, Serbia and Switzerland.
Vsak javni razpis za navadno pšenico in rž zadeva največjo količino za izvoz v tretje države, razen v Albanijo, Bosno in Hercegovino, Črno goro, Hrvaško, Lihtenštajn, Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Srbijo in Švico.
For barley, each invitation to tender shall cover a maximum quantity for export to third countries with the exception of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Canada, Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Liechtenstein, Mexico, Montenegro, Serbia [3] Including Kosovo, as defined in UN Security Council Resolution 1244 of 10 June 1999.
Vsak javni razpis za ječmen zadeva največjo količino za izvoz v tretje države, razen v Albanijo, Bosno in Hercegovino, Črno goro, Hrvaško, Kanado, Lihtenštajn, Mehiko, Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Srbijo [3] Vključno s Kosovom, kot je določeno v Resoluciji Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov št. 1244 z dne 10. junija 1999.
, Switzerland and the United States of America.
, Švico in Združene države Amerike.
Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 990/2006 is hereby replaced by the Annex hereto.
Priloga III k Uredbi (ES) št. 990/2006 se nadomesti z besedilom v Prilogi.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 205/2007 (OJ L 61, 28.2.2007, p. 10).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 205/2007 (UL L 61, 28.2.2007, str. 10).
Including Kosovo, as defined in UN Security Council Resolution 1244 of 10 June 1999.’
Vključno s Kosovom, kot je določeno v Resoluciji Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov št. 1244 z dne 10. junija 1999.“
in Bulgarian Мека пшеница от интервенция без прилагане на възстановяване или такса, Регламент (ЕО) № 990/2006
v bolgarščini Мека пшеница от интервенция без прилагане на възстановяване или такса, Регламент (ЕО) № 990/2006
in Danish Blød hvede fra intervention uden restitutionsydelse eller afgift, forordning (EF) nr. 990/2006
v danščini Blød hvede fra intervention uden restitutionsydelse eller afgift, forordning (EF) nr. 990/2006
in French Blé tendre d’intervention ne donnant pas lieu à restitution ni taxe, règlement (CE) no 990/2006
v francoščini Blé tendre d’intervention ne donnant pas lieu à restitution ni taxe, règlement (CE) no 990/2006
in Irish Gnáthchruithneacht in idirghabháil gan feidhmiú aisíoca nó forchur cánach, Rialachán (CE) Uimh.
v irščini Gnáthchruithneacht in idirghabháil gan feidhmiú aisíoca nó forchur cánach, Rialachán (CE) Uimh.
in Italian Frumento tenero d’intervento senza applicazione di restituzione né di tassa, regolamento (CE) n. 990/2006
v italijanščini Frumento tenero d’intervento senza applicazione di restituzione né di tassa, regolamento (CE) n. 990/2006
in Maltese Qamħ komuni ta’ l-intervent mingħajr applikazzjoni għal rifużjoni jew taxxa, Regolament (KE) Nru 990/2006
v malteščini Qamħ komuni ta’ l-intervent mingħajr applikazzjoni għal rifużjoni jew taxxa, Regolament (KE) Nru 990/2006
in Bulgarian Ечемик от интервенция без прилагане на възстановяване или такса, Регламент (ЕО) № 990/2006
v bolgarščini Ечемик от интервенция без прилагане на възстановяване или такса, Регламент (ЕО) № 990/2006
in Danish Byg fra intervention uden restitutionsydelse eller afgift, forordning (EF) nr. 990/2006
v danščini Byg fra intervention uden restitutionsydelse eller afgift, forordning (EF) nr. 990/2006