natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Provisions on limitation and prescription periods in international agreements as implemented in the Member States, for instance in the area of transport law, should not be affected by this Directive.
Na določbe o zastaralnih in prekluzivnih rokih v mednarodnih sporazumih, kot se izvajajo v državah članicah, na primer na področju prava prometa, ta direktiva ne bi smela vplivati.
Member States should encourage the provision of information to the general public on how to contact mediators and organisations providing mediation services.
Države članice bi morale spodbujati zagotavljanje informacij širši javnosti o tem, kako stopiti v stik z mediatorji in organizacijami, ki zagotavljajo storitve mediacije.
They should also encourage legal practitioners to inform their clients of the possibility of mediation.
Prav tako bi morale spodbuditi odvetnike, da svoje stranke obvestijo o možnosti mediacije.
In accordance with point 34 of the Interinstitutional agreement on better law-making [6], Member States are encouraged to draw up, for themselves and in the interests of the Community, their own tables illustrating, as far as possible, the correlation between this Directive and the transposition measures, and to make them public.
V skladu s točko 34 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje [6] se države članice spodbuja, da za svoje potrebe in v interesu Skupnosti izdelajo in objavijo lastne tabele, ki naj, kolikor nazorno je to mogoče, prikažejo korelacijo med to direktivo in ukrepi za prenos v nacionalno pravo.
This Directive seeks to promote the fundamental rights, and takes into account the principles, recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Ta direktiva si prizadeva spodbujati temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, ki so priznana zlasti v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
Since the objective of this Directive cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale or effects of the action, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Ker cilja te direktive države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in jih zaradi obsega ali učinkov ukrepov lažje doseže Skupnost, lahko Skupnost sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne prekoračuje okvirov, potrebnih za doseganje tega cilja.
In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, the United Kingdom and Ireland have given notice of their wish to take part in the adoption and application of this Directive.
V skladu s členom 3 Protokola o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske, priloženega Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, sta Združeno kraljestvo in Irska sporočila, da želita sodelovati pri sprejetju in uporabi te direktive.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark does not take part in the adoption of this Directive and is not bound by it or subject to its application,
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te direktive, ki zanjo zato ni zavezujoča niti se v njej ne uporablja –
The objective of this Directive is to facilitate access to alternative dispute resolution and to promote the amicable settlement of disputes by encouraging the use of mediation and by ensuring a balanced relationship between mediation and judicial proceedings.
Cilj te direktive je olajšati dostop do alternativnega reševanja sporov in spodbuditi mirno reševanje sporov s spodbujanjem uporabe mediacije in zagotavljanjem uravnoteženega odnosa med mediacijo in sodnimi postopki.
This Directive shall apply, in cross-border disputes, to civil and commercial matters except as regards rights and obligations which are not at the parties’ disposal under the relevant applicable law.
Ta direktiva se uporablja v čezmejnih sporih v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah, razen za tiste pravice in obveznosti, s katerimi stranke po ustrezni veljavni zakonodaji ne morejo razpolagati.
It shall not extend, in particular, to revenue, customs or administrative matters or to the liability of the State for acts and omissions in the exercise of State authority (acta iure imperii).
Ne uporablja se zlasti v davčnih, carinskih ali upravnih zadevah ali glede odgovornosti države za dejanja in opustitve pri izvajanju državne oblasti („acta iure imperii“).
In this Directive, the term ‘Member State’ shall mean Member States with the exception of Denmark.
Za namene te direktive „država članica“ pomeni vse države članice razen Danske.
Cross-border disputes
Čezmejni spori
For the purposes of this Directive a cross-border dispute shall be one in which at least one of the parties is domiciled or habitually resident in a Member State other than that of any other party on the date on which:
Za namene te direktive čezmejni spor pomeni spor, kadar ima vsaj ena od strank stalno ali običajno prebivališče v državi članici, v kateri stalno ali običajno ne prebiva nobena druga stranka, na dan, ko:
the parties agree to use mediation after the dispute has arisen;
se stranki po nastanku spora dogovorita za uporabo mediacije;
mediation is ordered by a court;
mediacijo odredi sodišče;
an obligation to use mediation arises under national law; or
po notranjem pravu nastane obveznost, da se uporabi mediacija, ali
for the purposes of Article 5 an invitation is made to the parties.
je bil za namene člena 5 izdan poziv strankam.
Notwithstanding paragraph 1, for the purposes of Articles 7 and 8 a cross-border dispute shall also be one in which judicial proceedings or arbitration following mediation between the parties are initiated in a Member State other than that in which the parties were domiciled or habitually resident on the date referred to in paragraph 1(a), (b) or (c).
Ne glede na odstavek 1 je za namene členov 7 in 8 čezmejni spor tudi tisti spor, kadar se sodni postopek ali arbitraža, ki sledi mediaciji med strankami, začne v državi članici, ki ni država članica, v kateri so imele stranke stalno ali običajno prebivališče na dan iz odstavka 1(a), (b) ali (c).
For the purposes of paragraphs 1 and 2, domicile shall be determined in accordance with Articles 59 and 60 of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001.
Za namene odstavkov 1 in 2 se stalno prebivališče določi v skladu s členoma 59 in 60 Uredbe (ES) št. 44/2001.
For the purposes of this Directive the following definitions shall apply:
V tej direktivi se uporabljata naslednji opredelitvi:
‘Mediation’ means a structured process, however named or referred to, whereby two or more parties to a dispute attempt by themselves, on a voluntary basis, to reach an agreement on the settlement of their dispute with the assistance of a mediator.
„Mediacija“ pomeni strukturiran postopek, kakor koli imenovan ali naveden, v katerem dve ali več strank v sporu poskuša prostovoljno s pomočjo mediatorja doseči dogovor o rešitvi spora.
This process may be initiated by the parties or suggested or ordered by a court or prescribed by the law of a Member State.
Ta postopek lahko začnejo stranke ali pa ga predlaga oziroma odredi sodišče ali predpiše zakonodaja države članice.
It includes mediation conducted by a judge who is not responsible for any judicial proceedings concerning the dispute in question.
Vključuje mediacijo, ki jo vodi sodnik, ki ni pristojen za nobenega od sodnih postopkov v zvezi z zadevnim sporom.
It excludes attempts made by the court or the judge seised to settle a dispute in the course of judicial proceedings concerning the dispute in question.
Izključeni pa so poskusi sodišča ali sodnika, ki mu je zadeva predložena v reševanje, med sodnim postopkom o zadevnem sporu.
‘Mediator’ means any third person who is asked to conduct a mediation in an effective, impartial and competent way, regardless of the denomination or profession of that third person in the Member State concerned and of the way in which the third person has been appointed or requested to conduct the mediation.
„Mediator“ pomeni vsako tretjo osebo, ki je zaprošena, da vodi mediacijo učinkovito, nepristransko in strokovno, ne glede na njen naziv ali poklic v zadevni državi članici in ne glede na način, na katerega je bila tretja oseba imenovana ali zaprošena za vodenje mediacije.
Ensuring the quality of mediation
Zagotavljanje kakovostne mediacije
Member States shall encourage, by any means which they consider appropriate, the development of, and adherence to, voluntary codes of conduct by mediators and organisations providing mediation services, as well as other effective quality control mechanisms concerning the provision of mediation services.
Države članice na kakršen koli način, ki se jim zdi primeren, spodbujajo razvijanje prostovoljnih kodeksov ravnanja in njihovo spoštovanje s strani mediatorjev in organizacij, ki opravljajo storitve mediacije, ter drugih učinkovitih mehanizmov nadzora kakovosti v zvezi z opravljanjem storitev mediacije.
Member States shall encourage the initial and further training of mediators in order to ensure that the mediation is conducted in an effective, impartial and competent way in relation to the parties.
Države članice spodbujajo začetno in nadaljnje usposabljanje mediatorjev, da se v odnosu do strank zagotovi učinkovito, nepristransko in strokovno vodenje mediacije.
Recourse to mediation
Uporaba mediacije
A court before which an action is brought may, when appropriate and having regard to all the circumstances of the case, invite the parties to use mediation in order to settle the dispute.
Sodišče, na katerem je vložena tožba, lahko, če je to primerno in ob upoštevanju vseh okoliščin primera, stranke povabi, da za rešitev spora uporabijo mediacijo.
The court may also invite the parties to attend an information session on the use of mediation if such sessions are held and are easily available.
Sodišče lahko stranke prav tako povabi, da se udeležijo informativnega sestanka o uporabi mediacije, če taki sestanki potekajo in so lahko dostopni.
This Directive is without prejudice to national legislation making the use of mediation compulsory or subject to incentives or sanctions, whether before or after judicial proceedings have started, provided that such legislation does not prevent the parties from exercising their right of access to the judicial system.
Ta direktiva ne posega v nacionalno zakonodajo, po kateri je mediacija pred uvedbo sodnega postopka ali po njej obvezna oziroma povezana s spodbudami ali sankcijami, pod pogojem, da takšna zakonodaja strankam ne preprečuje uveljavljanja pravice dostopa do sodnega sistema.
Enforceability of agreements resulting from mediation
Izvršljivost v mediaciji doseženih dogovorov
Member States shall ensure that it is possible for the parties, or for one of them with the explicit consent of the others, to request that the content of a written agreement resulting from mediation be made enforceable.
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko stranke oziroma ena od strank ob izrecnem soglasju ostalih strank zahtevajo razglasitev izvršljivosti vsebine pisnega dogovora, doseženega v mediaciji.
The content of such an agreement shall be made enforceable unless, in the case in question, either the content of that agreement is contrary to the law of the Member State where the request is made or the law of that Member State does not provide for its enforceability.
Vsebina takšnega dogovora je izvršljiva, razen če je v zadevnem primeru vsebina dogovora v nasprotju z zakonodajo države članice, v kateri je bila vložena zahteva, ali če njena zakonodaja ne predvideva njegove izvršljivosti.
The content of the agreement may be made enforceable by a court or other competent authority in a judgment or decision or in an authentic instrument in accordance with the law of the Member State where the request is made.
Vsebino dogovora lahko sodišče ali drug pristojni organ v skladu z zakonodajo države članice, v kateri se vloži zahteva, razglasi za izvršljivo s sodbo, odločbo ali javno listino.
Member States shall inform the Commission of the courts or other authorities competent to receive requests in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2.
Države članice Komisiji sporočijo imena sodišč ali drugih organov, ki so pristojni za sprejemanje zahtev v skladu z odstavkoma 1 in 2.
Nothing in this Article shall affect the rules applicable to the recognition and enforcement in another Member State of an agreement made enforceable in accordance with paragraph 1.
Ta člen v ničemer ne vpliva na predpise, ki se uporabljajo za priznanje in izvršitev dogovora, ki je razglašen za izvršljivega v skladu z odstavkom 1, v drugi državi članici.
Confidentiality of mediation
Zaupnost mediacije
Given that mediation is intended to take place in a manner which respects confidentiality, Member States shall ensure that, unless the parties agree otherwise, neither mediators nor those involved in the administration of the mediation process shall be compelled to give evidence in civil and commercial judicial proceedings or arbitration regarding information arising out of or in connection with a mediation process, except:
Ker naj bi mediacija potekala na način, ki spoštuje zaupnost, države članice zagotovijo, da, razen če se stranke ne dogovorijo drugače, niti mediator niti osebe, ki sodelujejo pri vodenju postopka mediacije, v civilnih in gospodarskih sodnih postopkih ali arbitraži ne morejo biti prisiljene, da zagotovijo dokaze v zvezi s podatki, ki izhajajo iz postopka mediacije ali so z njim povezani, razen:
where this is necessary for overriding considerations of public policy of the Member State concerned, in particular when required to ensure the protection of the best interests of children or to prevent harm to the physical or psychological integrity of a person; or
kadar je to potrebno zaradi pomembnih razlogov javnega reda zadevne države članice, zlasti kadar je treba zagotoviti zaščito interesov otrok ali preprečiti poseg v telesno ali duševno integriteto osebe; ali
where disclosure of the content of the agreement resulting from mediation is necessary in order to implement or enforce that agreement.
če je razkritje vsebine dogovora, doseženega v mediaciji, potrebno za izvajanje ali izvršitev tega dogovora.
Nothing in paragraph 1 shall preclude Member States from enacting stricter measures to protect the confidentiality of mediation.
Nobena določba iz odstavka 1 državam članicam ne preprečuje uzakonitve strožjih ukrepov za varstvo zaupnosti mediacije.
Effect of mediation on limitation and prescription periods
Učinek mediacije na prekluzivne in zastaralne roke
Member States shall ensure that parties who choose mediation in an attempt to settle a dispute are not subsequently prevented from initiating judicial proceedings or arbitration in relation to that dispute by the expiry of limitation or prescription periods during the mediation process.
Države članice zagotovijo, da stranke, ki so v poskusu reševanja spora izbrale mediacijo, zaradi izteka prekluzivnih ali zastaralnih rokov v postopku mediacije v nadaljevanju ne izgubijo možnosti uvedbe sodnega postopka ali arbitraže.
Paragraph 1 shall be without prejudice to provisions on limitation or prescription periods in international agreements to which Member States are party.
Odstavek 1 ne posega v določbe o prekluzivnih ali zastaralnih rokih, ki so del mednarodnih sporazumov, katerih pogodbenice so države članice.
Information for the general public
Informacije za širšo javnost
Member States shall encourage, by any means which they consider appropriate, the availability to the general public, in particular on the Internet, of information on how to contact mediators and organisations providing mediation services.
Države članice na ustrezen način spodbujajo zagotavljanje informacij širši javnosti, zlasti prek svetovnega spleta, o tem, kako vzpostaviti stik z mediatorji in organizacijami, ki ponujajo storitve mediacije.
Information on competent courts and authorities
Informacije o pristojnih sodiščih in organih
The Commission shall make publicly available, by any appropriate means, information on the competent courts or authorities communicated by the Member States pursuant to Article 6(3).
Komisija na ustrezen način omogoči, da so informacije o pristojnih sodiščih ali organih, ki jih sporočijo države članice v skladu s členom 6(3), dostopne javnosti.
Not later than 21 May 2016, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee a report on the application of this Directive.
Komisija najpozneje 21. maja 2016 Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru predloži poročilo o uporabi te direktive.
The report shall consider the development of mediation throughout the European Union and the impact of this Directive in the Member States.
Poročilo obravnava razvoj mediacije v vsej Evropski uniji in vpliv te direktive v državah članicah.
If necessary, the report shall be accompanied by proposals to adapt this Directive.
Poročilu se po potrebi priložijo predlogi za prilagoditev te direktive.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations, and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive before 21 May 2011, with the exception of Article 10, for which the date of compliance shall be 21 November 2010 at the latest.
Države članice uveljavijo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, pred 21. majem 2011, razen člena 10, za katerega se uskladitev izvede najpozneje do 21. novembra 2010.
When they are adopted by Member States, these measures shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference on the occasion of their official publication.
Države članice se v sprejetih ukrepih sklicujejo na to direktivo ali pa sklic nanjo navedejo ob njihovi uradni objavi.
OJ C 286, 17.11.2005, p. 1.
UL C 286, 17.11.2005, str. 1.
Opinion of the European Parliament of 29 March 2007 (OJ C 27 E, 31.1.2008, p. 129). Council Common Position of 28 February 2008 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and Position of the European Parliament of 23 April 2008 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje Evropskega parlamenta z dne 29. marca 2007 (UL C 27 E, 31.1.2008, str. 129), Skupno stališče Sveta z dne 28. februarja 2008 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 23. aprila 2008 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
Commission Recommendation 2001/310/EC of 4 April 2001 on the principles for out-of-court bodies involved in the consensual resolution of consumer disputes (OJ L 109, 19.4.2001, p. 56).
Priporočilo Komisije 2001/310/ES z dne 4. aprila 2001 o načelih za izvensodne organe, ki so vključeni v sporazumno reševanje potrošniških sporov (UL L 109, 19.4.2001, str. 56).
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2116/2004 (OJ L 367, 14.12.2004, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 2116/2004 (UL L 367, 14.12.2004, str. 1).
Commission Directive 2008/53/EC
Direktiva Komisije 2008/53/ES
amending Annex IV to Council Directive 2006/88/EC as regards Spring viraemia of carp (SVC)
o spremembi Priloge IV k Direktivi Sveta 2006/88/ES glede spomladanske viremije pri krapih (SVC)
Having regard to Council Directive 2006/88/EC of 24 October 2006 on animal health requirements for aquaculture animals and products thereof, and on the prevention and control of certain diseases in aquatic animals [1], and in particular Article 61(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2006/88/ES z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o zahtevah za zdravstveno varstvo živali in proizvodov iz ribogojstva ter o preprečevanju in nadzoru nekaterih bolezni pri vodnih živalih [1] in zlasti člena 61(2) Direktive,
Directive 2006/88/EC lays down certain animal health rules applicable to aquaculture animals and products thereof.
Direktiva 2006/88/ES določa nekatere predpise v zvezi z zdravjem živali, ki se uporabljajo za živali in proizvode iz ribogojstva.
Those rules take into account the listing of diseases as exotic and non-exotic in Part II of Annex IV to that Directive and the susceptible species.
Navedena pravila upoštevajo navedbe eksotičnih in neeksotičnih bolezni iz dela II Priloge IV k navedeni direktivi ter dovzetne vrste.
Spring viraemia of carp (SVC) is included in the list of non-exotic diseases in Part II of Annex IV to Directive 2006/88/EC.
Spomladanska viremija pri krapih (SVC) je vključena v seznam neeksotičnih bolezni iz dela II Priloge IV k Direktivi 2006/88/ES.
In the framework of discussions in the Council leading to the adoption of Directive 2006/88/EC, the Commission issued a declaration acknowledging the concerns raised by several of the carp producing Member States on the consequences of having SVC subject to harmonised Community provisions.
V okviru razprav v Svetu, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta Direktiva 2006/88/ES, je Komisija objavila izjavo, ki priznava pomisleke več držav članic proizvajalk krapov, o posledicah usklajenih ukrepov Skupnosti na SVC.
The Commission therefore declared that it would, after the entry into force of Directive 2006/88/EC, but before its date of application, upon the request and based on the arguments presented to it, re-assess whether SVC should continue be included in the list in Part II of Annex IV to that Directive.
Komisija je zato navedla, da bo po začetku veljavnosti Direktive 2006/88/ES, vendar pred datumom uveljavitve, na zahtevo in na podlagi razlogov, ki ji bodo predstavljeni, ponovno ocenila ali bo SVC še naprej vključena v seznam iz dela II Priloge IV k navedeni direktivi.
The Commission has received requests for re-assessment from several Member States.
Komisija je od več držav članic prejela zahtevo za ponovno oceno.
Part I of Annex IV to Directive 2006/88/EC sets out the criteria for listing diseases as exotic and non-exotic.
Del I Priloge IV k Direktivi 2006/88/ES določa merila za navajanje bolezni kot eksotičnih in neeksotičnih.
According to the criteria for listing non-exotic diseases, consideration should be given as to whether the disease has the potential for significant economic impact if introduced into a Member State free of the disease by production losses and by annual costs associated with the disease and its control exceeding 5 % of the value of the production of the susceptible aquaculture animal species production in the region.
V skladu z merili za navajanje neeksotičnih bolezni je treba presoditi, ali bolezen lahko vpliva na gospodarstvo, če se vnese v državo, prosto te bolezni, z izgubami pri proizvodnji ter letnimi stroški, povezanimi z boleznijo in njenim nadzorom, ki presegajo 5 % vrednosti regionalne proizvodnje vrst živali iz ribogojstva, dovzetnih za bolezen.
According to information from the main carp production Member States, SVC is already an endemic disease.
V skladu z informacijami iz glavnih držav članic proizvajalk krapov je SVC že endemična bolezen.
However, during the last 20 to 25 years, SVC has not caused major losses to the industry.
Vendar v zadnjih 20 do 25 letih SVC industriji ni povzročila večjih izgub.
In addition, it is appropriate to consider whether SVC may be controlled at Member State level and whether such control is cost-beneficial.
Poleg tega je primerno presoditi, ali se lahko SVC nadzoruje na ravni države članice in ali ima tak nadzor stroškovne koristi.