natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Council's Return Action Programme of 28 November 2002, based on the Commission's Communication of 14 October 2002 on a Community return policy on illegal residents, addresses the entire chain of action with respect to return management in Member States, covering both forced and voluntary return of third-country nationals as well as the central stages of return, including preparation and follow-up.
Akcijski program Sveta za vračanje z dne 28. novembra 2002, ki temelji na Sporočilu Komisije z dne 14. oktobra 2002 o politiki vračanja Skupnosti glede nezakonitih priseljencev, obravnava celotno verigo ukrepov, ki se nanašajo na upravljanje vračanja v državah članicah, ter zajema prostovoljno in prisilno vračanje državljanov tretjih držav ter najpomembnejše faze vračanja, vključno s pripravo in nadaljnjimi ukrepi.
The European Council, at its meeting in Thessaloniki on 19 and 20 June 2003, called on the Commission to examine all aspects relating to a separate Community instrument on return in order to support, in particular the priorities as set out in the Return Action Programme.
Evropski svet je na svojem zasedanju v Solunu 19. in 20. junija 2003 pozval Komisijo, naj preuči vse vidike v zvezi z ločenim instrumentom Skupnosti za vračanje, da bi tako podprli zlasti prednostne naloge, navedene v Akcijskem programu za vračanje.
The Council Conclusions on the priorities for the successful development of a common re-admission policy of 2 November 2004 emphasise that Community re-admission agreements make an important contribution to an effective joint migration management and play a valuable role in the fight against illegal immigration.
V Sklepih Sveta o prednostnih nalogah za uspešen razvoj skupne politike ponovnega sprejemanja z dne 2. novembra 2004 je poudarjeno, da sporazumi Skupnosti o ponovnem sprejemu pomembno prispevajo k učinkovitemu skupnemu upravljanju z migracijami in igrajo pomembno vlogo v boju proti nezakonitemu priseljevanju.
They are an important element in the framework of the dialogue and cooperation between the European Union and the countries of origin, former residence and transit of illegal immigrants.
Sporazumi so pomemben element v okviru dialoga in sodelovanja med Evropsko unijo in državami izvora, prejšnjega prebivališča in tranzita nezakonitih priseljencev.
Following the Conclusions of 8 June 2004 in which the Council called on the budgetary authority to make preparatory actions available and invited the Commission to take into account its view on the development of integrated return plans in close cooperation with Member States, preparatory actions were initiated for the period 2005 and 2006.
Potem ko je Svet v Sklepih z dne 8. junija 2004 pozval proračunski organ, naj predvidi sredstva za pripravljalne ukrepe, in pozval Komisijo, naj upošteva njegovo stališče glede razvoja integriranega načrta vračanja v tesnem sodelovanju z državami članicami, so se pripravljalni ukrepi za obdobje 2005 in 2006 že pričeli.
The European Council, at its meeting in Brussels on 4 and 5 November 2004, called in ‘The Hague Programme’ for launching the preparatory phase of a European Return Fund (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Fund’) and the establishment of the Fund by 2007, taking into account the evaluation of the preparatory phase.
Evropski svet je na svojem zasedanju v Bruslju 4. in 5. novembra 2004 v „Haaškem programu“ pozval k začetku pripravljalne faze za Evropski sklad za vračanje (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Sklad“) in k ustanovitvi Sklada do leta 2007, pri čemer bi se upoštevalo ovrednotenje pripravljalne faze.
In November 2004 the Council took note of the Presidency's report on an analysis of reported best practices of return to specific countries.
Novembra 2004 se je Svet seznanil s poročilom predsedstva o analizi sporočenih najboljših praks vračanja v določene države.
The report stated ample possibilities and a need for more practical cooperation between Member States in the practice of return.
V poročilu je bilo ugotovljeno, da obstajajo široke možnosti in potreba po bolj praktičnem sodelovanju med državami članicami v zvezi s praksami vračanja.
The report indicated possibilities for a more integrated approach, on both national and Community level, of return policy as well as general policies.
V poročilu so bile nakazane možnosti za bolj integriran pristop do politik vračanja ter splošnih politik na nacionalni ravni in na ravni Skupnosti.
Also, the report identified best practices by Member States regarding the voluntary or forced return of third-country nationals to their country of origin or transit, such as the promotion of Assisted Voluntary Return Programmes for sustainable return, return counselling, and the organisation of joint return operations, including charter flights.
Poleg tega so bile v tem poročilu opisane najboljše prakse držav članic pri prostovoljnem ali prisilnem vračanju državljanov tretjih držav v njihovo državo izvora ali tranzita, kot so spodbujanje programov za prostovoljno vračanje, svetovanje glede vračanja ter organizacija skupnih operacij vračanja, vključno s čarterskimi poleti.
It is necessary to endow the Community with an instrument designed to support and encourage the efforts made by the Member States to improve the management of return in all its dimensions, on the basis of the principle of integrated return management, and with a view to supporting a fair and effective implementation of common standards on return, as established under Community legislation on return.
Nujno je, da Skupnost dobi instrument, zasnovan za podporo in spodbujanje držav članic pri prizadevanjih za boljše upravljanje vračanja v vseh njegovih razsežnostih, in sicer na podlagi načela integriranega upravljanja vračanja ter z namenom podpiranja poštenega in učinkovitega izvajanja skupnih standardov vračanja, določenih v okviru zakonodaje Skupnosti, ki se nanaša na vračanje.
No funding should be provided for in 2007 under this Decision, in order to be able to take into account the results of preparatory actions on return in 2005 and 2006, on the basis of a report by the Commission on the evaluation of the preparatory actions.
Za leto 2007 v okviru te odločbe ni potrebno predvideti nobenega financiranja, tako da bi na podlagi poročila Komisije o ovrednotenju pripravljalnih ukrepov lahko upoštevali rezultate pripravljalnih ukrepov za vračanje v letih 2005 in 2006.
The common standards concerned are in particular Council Directive 2001/40/EC of 28 May 2001 on the mutual recognition of decisions on the expulsion of third-country nationals and its corollary, Council Decision 2004/191/EC of 23 February 2004 setting out the criteria and practical arrangements for the compensation of the financial imbalances resulting from the application of Directive 2001/40/EC on the mutual recognition of decisions on expulsion of third-country nationals, and Council Decision 2004/573/EC of 29 April 2004 on the organisation of joint flights for removals from the territory of two or more Member States, of third-country nationals who are subjects of individual removal orders.
Zadevni skupni standardi izhajajo zlasti iz Direktive Sveta 2001/40/ES z dne 28. maja 2001 o medsebojnem priznavanju odločb o izgonu državljanov tretjih držav in aktov, ki jo dopolnjujejo, in sicer Odločbe Sveta 2004/191/ES z dne 23. februarja 2004 o določitvi meril in praktičnih rešitev za izravnavo finančnih neskladij, ki so posledica uporabe Direktive 2001/40/ES o medsebojnem priznavanju odločb o izgonu državljanov tretjih držav, in Odločbe Sveta 2004/573/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o organiziranju skupnih letov zaradi odstranitve državljanov tretjih držav, ki so predmet posameznih odredb o odstranitvi z ozemlja dveh ali več držav članic.
This concerns also future Community instruments, such as an instrument on common standards on procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, which should create a level playing field in the European Union on return procedures and would therefore define conditions for and the margin within which Member States take return measures.
To zadeva tudi bodoče instrumente Skupnosti, kot je instrument o skupnih standardih in postopkih držav članic za vračanje državljanov tretjih držav, ki tam prebivajo nezakonito, s čimer bi morali biti v Evropski uniji pri postopkih vračanja vzpostavljeni enaki pogoji, s tem pa opredeljeni pogoji in meje, v okviru katerih države članice sprejemajo ukrepe v zvezi z vračanjem.
Member States should ensure that actions under the Fund respect the obligations derived from fundamental rights, laid down in particular in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (the European Convention on Human Rights), the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees of 28 July 1951 as supplemented by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967, and other relevant international instruments, such as the 1989 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, where applicable.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da bodo pri ukrepih v okviru Sklada spoštovane obveznosti, ki izvirajo iz temeljnih pravic, zlasti kakor so določene v Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic“), Listini o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije, Ženevski konvenciji z dne 28. julija 1951 o statusu beguncev, kakor je bila dopolnjena z Newyorškim protokolom z dne 31. januarja 1967, in drugih ustreznih mednarodnih instrumentih, kot je na primer, kjer je to ustrezno, Konvencija o otrokovih pravicah iz leta 1989.
Bearing in mind that collective expulsion is prohibited under Protocol 4 to the European Convention on Human Rights, only persons who are the subject of individual removal orders should be returned via joint return operations eligible for funding under this Decision.
Glede na to, da je kolektivni izgon v skladu s Protokolom št. 4 k Evropski konvencije o človekovih pravicah prepovedan, bi se lahko preko skupnih operacij vračanja, ki so v skladu s to odločbo upravičene do financiranja, vračale samo osebe, ki so predmet posamičnih odredb o odstranitvi.
As stated in the Return Action Programme, approved by the Council on 28 November 2002, and constantly reaffirmed in the European Union instruments in this area, such as in particular the Council Conclusions on voluntary return of 2 November 2005, voluntary return is an important component of a balanced, effective and sustainable approach to the return.
Kot je navedeno v Akcijskem programu za vračanje, ki ga je Svet odobril 28. novembra 2002 in ga nenehno potrjuje v instrumentih Evropske unije na tem področju, kot so predvsem Sklepi Sveta o prostovoljnem vračanju z dne 2. novembra 2005, je prostovoljno vračanje pomemben sestavni del uravnovešenega, učinkovitega in trajnega pristopa v zvezi z vračanjem.
Eligible actions within the scope of the integrated management of return should take account of the specific situation of vulnerable persons.
Pri upravičenih ukrepih v sklopu integriranega upravljanja vračanja bi bilo treba upoštevati poseben položaj ranljivih oseb.
To enhance efficiency in return management at national level, the Fund should also cover actions relating to voluntary return of persons who are not under an obligation to leave the territory, such as applicants for asylum who have not yet received a negative decision, or persons enjoying a form of international protection within the meaning of Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third-country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, or persons enjoying temporary protection within the meaning of Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof.
Da bi izboljšali učinkovitost upravljanja vračanja na nacionalni ravni, bi moral Sklad urejati tudi ukrepe prostovoljnega vračanja oseb, ki niso obvezane zapustiti zadevnega ozemlja, kot so prosilci za azil, ki še niso prejeli negativne odločbe, ali osebe, ki uživajo katero od oblik mednarodne zaščite v smislu Direktive Sveta 2004/83/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o minimalnih standardih glede pogojev, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati državljani tretjih držav ali osebe brez državljanstva, da se jim prizna status begunca ali osebe, ki iz drugih razlogov potrebuje mednarodno zaščito, in o vsebini te zaščite, ali osebe, ki uživajo začasno zaščito v smislu Direktive Sveta 2001/55/ES z dne 20. julija 2001 o najnižjih standardih za dodelitev začasne zaščite v primeru množičnega prihoda razseljenih oseb in o ukrepih za uravnoteženje prizadevanj in posledic za države članice pri sprejemanju takšnih oseb.
A primary objective of this Decision should be the promotion of integrated return management at national level.
Glavni cilj te odločbe bi moral biti spodbujanje integriranega upravljanja vračanja na nacionalni ravni.
Member States are encouraged to implement return operations in the light of integrated return action plans, which analyse the situation in the Member State with respect to the targeted population, set targets with respect to the operations envisaged and, in cooperation with relevant stakeholders, such as United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the International Organisation for Migration (IOM), offer return schemes focusing on effective and sustainable returns through various measures.
Države članice se spodbuja k izvajanju ukrepov vračanja v luči integriranih akcijskih načrtov za vračanje, v katerih so analizirane razmere v državi članici glede na ciljno populacijo, so zastavljeni cilji predvidenih ukrepov in v okviru katerih so v sodelovanju z ustreznimi zainteresiranimi stranmi, kot sta Visoki komisar ZN za begunce (UNHCR) in Mednarodna organizacija za migracije (IOM), ponujene sheme vračanja, osredotočene na učinkovite in trajne vrnitve, temelječe na različnih ukrepih.
Where appropriate, integrated return plans should be regularly assessed and adjusted.
Po potrebi bi bilo treba integrirane načrte vračanja redno ocenjevati in prilagajati.
To promote the voluntary return of persons, in particular persons who are under no obligation to leave the territory, provision should be made for incentives for such returnees, such as preferential treatment by providing enhanced return assistance.
Za pospeševanje prostovoljnega vračanja oseb, zlasti oseb, ki niso obvezane zapustiti zadevnega ozemlja, bi za takšne povratnike morali predvideti spodbude, kot je preferencialna obravnava z več pomoči pri vračanju.
This kind of voluntary return is both in the interests of a dignified return of returnees, as well as of the authorities in terms of cost-effectiveness.
Ta način prostovoljnega vračanja je v interesu dostojanstvene vrnitve povratnikov, iz razloga stroškovne učinkovitosti pa tudi v interesu organov oblasti.
Member States should be encouraged to give preference to voluntary return.
Države članice bi bilo treba spodbujati, da dajo prednost prostovoljnemu vračanju.
However, from a policy point of view, voluntary and enforced return are interlinked and have a mutually reinforcing effect and Member States should be encouraged in their return management to reinforce the complementarity of the two forms.
Vendar sta z vidika politike prostovoljno in prisilno vračanje tesno povezana in se medsebojno krepita, zato bi bilo treba države članice pri njihovem upravljanju vračanja spodbujati h krepitvi komplementarnosti obeh oblik.
There is an obvious need to carry out forced returns in order to safeguard the integrity of the immigration and asylum policy of the European Union and the immigration and asylum systems of the Member States.
Potreba po izvajanju prisilnih vrnitev zaradi ohranitve doslednosti politike priseljevanja in azilne politike Evropske unije ter sistemov priseljevanja in azila držav članic je očitna.
Thus the possibility of forced return is a prerequisite for ensuring that this policy is not undermined and for enforcing the rule of law, which itself is essential to the creation of an area of freedom, security and justice.
Tako je možnost prisilnega vračanja predpogoj za trdnost te politike in uveljavljanje pravne države, ki je sama po sebi bistvenega pomena za vzpostavitev območja svobode, varnosti in pravice.
This Decision should therefore support actions of Member States to facilitate enforced return.
S to odločbo bi zato morali podpreti ukrepe držav članic za lažje prisilno vračanje.
Moreover, the major obstacles experienced by Member States in the field of return often occur in relation to forced returns.
Poleg tega se poglavitne ovire, s katerimi se države članice soočajo pri vračanju, pogosto pojavljajo v povezavi s prisilnimi vrnitvami.
One important obstacle is uncertainty concerning the identity of the person concerned and/or his or her lack of the necessary travel documents.
Ena od pomembnih ovir je negotovost glede identitete zadevnih oseb in/ali dejstvo, da nimajo potrebnih potnih listin.
In order to overcome such problems, Member States should be encouraged to improve the cooperation with consular services of third countries and to increase the exchange of information and operational cooperation among themselves as regards the cooperation with such services.
Da bi premostili take probleme, bi bilo treba države članice spodbuditi k boljšemu sodelovanju s konzularnimi službami tretjih držav in k obsežnejši izmenjavi podatkov ter operativnemu sodelovanju med državami članicami v povezavi s sodelovanjem s temi službami.
It is also imperative for this Decision to support, in those Member States which consider it appropriate, specific measures for returnees in the country of return in order first to ensure effective return to their town or region of origin under good conditions and second to enhance their durable reintegration in their community.
Hkrati je za to določbo ključnega pomena, da se z njo v tistih državah članicah, ki štejejo to za ustrezno, podprejo posebni ukrepi za povratnike v državi vrnitve, in sicer prvič zato, da bi se ti dejansko vrnili v svoje izvorno mesto ali regijo pod dobrimi pogoji, in drugič, da bi podprli njihovo trajno ponovno vključitev v njihovo skupnost.
Such measures should not consist of assistance to the third country as such and should only be eligible for funding when and insofar as there is a necessary continuation with activities initiated and in the main carried out in the territory of the Member States under an integrated return plan.
Takšni ukrepi ne bi smeli pomeniti pomoči tretji državi kot taki in bi bili lahko upravičeni do financiranja le, če in kolikor je potrebno z njimi nadaljevati že začete dejavnosti in se v glavnem izvajajo na ozemlju držav članic v okviru integriranega načrta vračanja.
Moreover, those measures should be in synergy with the actions supported by the Community instruments on external assistance, in particular the thematic programme on asylum and migration.
Poleg tega bi morali biti ti ukrepi v sinergiji z ukrepi, ki jih podpirajo instrumenti Komisije o zunanji pomoči, zlasti s tematskim programom o azilu in migracijah.
This Decision is designed to form part of a coherent framework which also includes Decision No 573/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 May 2007 establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013 as part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’, Decision No 574/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 May 2007 establishing the External Borders Fund for the period 2007 to 2013 as part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’ and Council Decision 2007/.../EC of ... establishing the European Fund for the Integration of Third-country Nationals for the period 2007 to 2013 as part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’, which aims to address the issue of fairly sharing responsibilities between Member States as concerns the financial burden arising from the introduction of integrated management of the European Union's external borders and from the implementation of common policies on asylum and immigration, as developed in accordance with Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty.
Ta odločba je zasnovana kot del usklajenega okvira, ki zajema tudi Odločbo št. 573/2007/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. maja 2007 o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za begunce za obdobje 2008–2013 v okviru splošnega programa „Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov“, Odločbo št. 574/2007/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. maja 2007 o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za zunanje meje za obdobje 2007–2013 v okviru splošnega programa „Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov“ in Odločbo Sveta št. .../2007/ES z dne ... o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za vključevanje državljanov tretjih držav za obdobje 2007–2013 v okviru splošnega programa „Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov“, in ki je namenjen obravnavanju vprašanja poštene delitve odgovornosti med državami članicami, kar zadeva finančno breme, ki izhaja iz uvedbe integriranega upravljanja zunanjih meja Unije in iz izvajanja skupnih politik azila in priseljevanja v skladu z naslovom IV Pogodbe.
The European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union, established in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agency’), has as one of its tasks to provide the necessary assistance for organising joint return operations by Member States and identify best practices on the acquisition of travel documents and the removal of third-country nationals illegally present in the territories of the Member States.
Ena izmed nalog Evropske agencije za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije, ustanovljene v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2007/2004 (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Agencija“), je zagotavljanje pomoči, potrebne za organizacijo skupnih operacij vračanja držav članic, in opredelitev najboljših praks pri pridobivanju potnih listin in odstranjevanju državljanov tretjih držav, ki se nezakonito zadržujejo na ozemlju držav članic.
Accordingly, the Agency should ensure that the conditions for an effective coordinated return effort between Member States are met, whilst leaving the implementation and organisation of the joint return operations to the competent national services.
Skladno s tem bi morala Agencija zagotoviti, da bodo ustvarjeni pogoji za dejansko usklajenost držav članic pri prizadevanjih v zvezi z vračanjem, ob tem pa se izvajanje in organizacija skupnih operacij vračanja prepusti pristojnim nacionalnim službam.
Therefore, the Agency should be able to use resources made available by Community actions in this Decision.
Zato bi se Agenciji morala omogočiti uporaba virov, ki jih daje Skupnost na voljo z ukrepi iz te odločbe.
The support provided by the Fund would be more efficient and better targeted if co-financing of eligible actions were based on strategic multiannual programming, drawn up by each Member State in dialogue with the Commission.
Podpora, ki jo zagotavlja Sklad, bi bila bolj učinkovita in bolje usmerjena, če bi sofinanciranje upravičenih ukrepov temeljilo na strateškem večletnem programiranju, ki bi ga pripravila vsaka država članica v dogovoru s Komisijo.