natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Agency shall be responsible for carrying out the following implementation tasks for the management of Community actions in the fields of energy, entrepreneurship and innovation, including eco-innovation, and sustainable freight transport, under the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme 2007-2013 established by Decision No 1639/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (hereinafter referred to as the CIP), and the second Marco Polo Programme 2007-2013 established by Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council:(a) managing all the phases in the lifetime of specific projects in the context of the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programme and the Intelligent Energy — Europe Programme established by Decision No 1639/2006/EC and the second Marco Polo Programme, as well as the necessary checks to that end, by adopting the relevant decisions where the Commission has empowered it to do so;
Agencija je pristojna za izvedbo naslednjih izvedbenih nalog za upravljanje aktivnosti Skupnosti na področju energetike, podjetništva in inovativnosti, vključno z ekološkimi inovacijami in trajnostnim tovornim prometom v okviru Okvirnega programa za konkurenčnost in inovativnost za obdobje 2007–2013, vzpostavljenega s Sklepom št. 1639/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (v nadaljevanju ‚OPKI‘) in drugega programa Marco Polo za obdobje 2007–2013, vzpostavljenega z Uredbo (ES) št. 1692/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta:(a) upravljanje vseh faz posebnih projektov v okviru Programa za podjetništvo in inovacije ter programa ‚Inteligentna energija – Evropa‘, vzpostavljenega s Sklepom št. 1639/2006/ES in drugega programa Marco Polo ter tudi potrebnih pregledov s sprejemanjem pomembnih odločitev na osnovi pooblastil, ki ji jih je dodelila Komisija;
adopting the instruments of budget implementation for revenue and expenditure and carrying out, where the Commission has empowered it to do so, all the operations necessary to manage the implementing measures and, in particular, those linked to the award of contracts and grants under the CIP and the second Marco Polo Programme;
sprejemanje instrumentov za proračunsko izvrševanje prihodkov in odhodkov ter izvrševanje proračuna na osnovi pooblastila Komisije, vseh potrebnih ukrepov za upravljanje izvedbenih ukrepov in zlasti tistih, ki so povezani z oddajo javnih naročil in dotacij v okviru OPKI in drugega programa Marco Polo;
gathering, analysing and passing on to the Commission all the information needed to guide and evaluate the implementation of the CIP and the second Marco Polo Programme.
zbiranje, analiza in posredovanje informacij, potrebnih za usmerjanje in ocenjevanje izvajanja OPKI in drugega programa Marco Polo, Komisiji.
The Agency shall also manage all the phases in the lifetime of the implementing measures delegated to it in the framework of the following programmes:
Agencija upravlja tudi vse faze izvedbenih ukrepov, za katere je bila pooblaščena v okviru naslednjih programov:
Intelligent Energy — Europe (2003 to 2006) established by Decision No 1230/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council;
program ‚Inteligentna energija – Evropa‘ za obdobje 2003–2006, vzpostavljen z Odločbo št. 1230/2003/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta;
Marco Polo (2003 to 2006) established by Regulation (EC) No 1382/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
program Marco Polo za obdobje 2003–2006, vzpostavljen z Uredbo (ES) št. 1382/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
The Commission’s rights and obligations in respect of the implementing measures referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph are assigned to the Agency.
Pravice in dolžnosti Komisije v zvezi z izvedbenimi ukrepi iz točke 2(b) se dodelijo agenciji.
The Agency may be charged by the Commission, following the opinion of the committee established by Article 24 of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003, to carry out tasks of the same type under the CIP or other Community programmes, within the meaning of Article 2 of that Regulation, in the fields referred to in paragraph 1.
Komisija lahko v smislu člena 2 zadevne uredbe na področjih iz odstavka 1 in v skladu z mnenjem odbora, vzpostavljenega s členom 24 Uredbe (ES) št. 58/2003, agencijo zadolži za opravljanje istovrstnih nalog v okviru OPKI ali drugih programov Skupnosti.
The Commission Decision delegating authority to the Agency shall set out in detail all the tasks entrusted to it and shall be adapted in the light of any additional tasks which may be entrusted to the Agency.
Sklep Komisije o pooblastilu agencije podrobno določa vse naloge, ki ji bodo zaupane, in bo v primeru dodelitve katerih koli dodatnih nalog, ki bodo morda zaupane Agenciji, ustrezno spremenjen.
The Commission decision will be transmitted, for information, to the committee established by Article 24 of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003.
Komisija bo o sklepu obvestila odbor, vzpostavljen s členom 24 Uredbe (ES) št. 58/2003.
Grants
Dotacije
The Agency shall receive grants which shall be entered in the general budget of the European Communities from the funds allocated to the CIP and the second Marco Polo Programme and, where appropriate, other Community programmes or actions entrusted to the Agency for implementation pursuant to Article 4(3).’;
Agencija prejema dotacije, ki so predvidene v splošnem proračunu Evropskih skupnosti, iz sredstev, dodeljenih za program OPKI in drugi program Marco Polo ter, po potrebi, za druge programe ali ukrepe Skupnosti, katerih izvajanje je zaupano Agenciji na podlagi člena 4(3).“
Implementation of the administrative budget
Izvrševanje administrativnega proračuna
The Agency shall implement its administrative budget in accordance with the provisions of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004.Article 2
Agencija izvršuje administrativni proračun v skladu z določbami Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1653/2004.Člen 2
All references to the Intelligent Energy Executive Agency shall be interpreted as references to the Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Vsa sklicevanja na „Izvajalsko agencijo za inteligentno energijo“ se razlagajo kot sklicevanja na „Izvajalsko agencijo za konkurenčnost in inovativnost“, in sicer po sprejetju tega sklepa.
Done at Brussels, 31 May 2007.
V Bruslju, 31. maja 2007
OJ L 5, 9.1.2004, p. 85.
UL L 5, 9.1.2004, str. 85.
Decision as amended by Decision 787/2004/EC (OJ L 138, 30.4.2004, p. 12).
Odločba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo 787/2004/ES (UL L 138, 30.4.2004, str. 12).
OJ L 196, 2.8.2003, p. 1.’
UL L 196, 2.8.2003, str. 1.“
OJ L 297, 22.9.2004, p. 6.’
UL L 297, 22.9.2004, str. 6.“
of 24 January 2007
z dne 24. januarja 2007
on State aid C 52/2005 (ex NN 88/2005, ex CP 101/2004) implemented by the Italian Republic for the subsidised purchase of digital decoders
o državni pomoči C 52/2005 (ex NN 88/2005, ex CP 101/2004) Italijanske republike za subvencioniran nakup digitalnih sprejemnikov
(notified under document number C(2006) 6634)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 6634)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above, and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi členi, in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
On 11 May 2004, the company Centro Europa 7 srl (hereinafter referred to as Europa 7) submitted a State aid complaint against Article 4(1) of Law No 350 of 24 December 2003 (2004 Finance Act).
Družba Centro Europa 7 s.r.l. (v nadaljevanju „Europa 7“) je 11. maja 2004 vložila pritožbo v zvezi z državno pomočjo v okviru člena 4(1) zakona št. 350 z dne 24. decembra 2003 (finančni zakon za leto 2004).
On 3 May 2005 the company Sky Italia srl (hereinafter referred to as Sky Italia) also submitted a complaint against the two Articles cited.
Dne 3. maja 2005 je tudi družba Sky Italia s.r.l. (v nadaljevanju „Sky Italia“) vložila pritožbo na podlagi obeh navedenih členov.
On 22 June 2005, a meeting was held between the Commission and Sky Italia.
Dne 22. junija 2005 je potekal sestanek med Komisijo in družbo Sky Italia.
On 31 August 2005, Sky Italia submitted further information concerning amendments to the Law of 3 May 2004 entitled ‘Regulations and principles governing the set-up of the broadcasting system and RAI-Radiotelevisione italiana SpA, authorising the government to issue a consolidated broadcasting act’ (known as the Gasparri law), which regulates the television sector in Italy.
Družba Sky Italia je 31. avgusta 2005 predložila dodatne informacije glede sprememb zakona z dne 3. maja 2004 z naslovom „Predpisi in načela, ki urejajo vzpostavitev radiodifuzijskega sistema in javne radiotelevizije RAI – Radiotelevisione italiana S.p.a. in vlado pooblaščajo za izdajo konsolidiranega zakona o radiodifuziji“ (znan kot Gasparrijev zakon), ki ureja televizijski sektor v Italiji.
Finally, on 31 October 2005 Sky Italia requested the Commission — pending a decision — to order the Italian Government to suspend the measure pursuant to Article 11(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 88 of the EC Treaty.
Nazadnje, 31. oktobra 2005 je družba Sky Italia od Komisije zahtevala, naj do sprejetja odločitve italijanski vladi odredi, da opusti ukrep v skladu s členom 11(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES.
By letters dated 13 October 2004, 21 April 2005 and 15 July 2005, the Commission submitted requests for information to the Italian Government.
Komisija je z dopisi z dne 13. oktobra 2004, 21. aprila 2005 in 15. julija 2005 italijansko vlado pozvala, naj predloži informacije.
The information was provided on 5 November 2004, 13 May 2005 and 12 September 2005, following a short extension of the deadline.
Informacije so bile posredovane 5. novembra 2004, 13. maja 2005 in 12. septembra 2005, po kratkem podaljšanju roka.
A meeting also took place between the Commission and Italy on 6 June 2005.
Komisija in Italija sta se tudi sestali 6. junija 2005.
By letters dated 20 September 2005 and 16 November 2005, Italy informed the Commission of its intention not to extend the scheme in the same form.
Z dopisi z dne 20. septembra 2005 in 16. novembra 2005 je Italija Komisijo obvestila o svoji nameri, da ne bo podaljšala sheme pomoči v isti obliki.
By letter dated 21 December 2005, the Commission informed Italy that it had decided to initiate the formal investigation procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid in question (hereinafter referred to as decision to initiate the procedure).
Z dopisom z dne 21. decembra 2005 je Komisija Italijo obvestila, da bo zaradi zadevne pomoči sprožila formalni postopek preiskave iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe ES (v nadaljevanju „odločitev o sprožitvi postopka“).
The Commission called on interested parties to submit their comments on the measures in question.
Komisija je pozvala vse zainteresirane stranke, naj predložijo svoje pripombe k zadevnim ukrepom.
Following the extension of the deadline, Italy responded by letter dated 13 February 2006 to the request for comments made in the decision to initiate the procedure.
Italija je pripombe k odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka predložila po podaljšanju roka z dopisom z dne 13. februarja 2006.
The Commission also received comments from the following interested parties: National Federation of Electronic and Electrotechnic Companies (ANIE) by letter dated 19 June 2006, Europa 7 by letter dated 19 June 2006, European Satellite Operator Association (ESOA) by letter dated 20 June 2006 Mediaset SpA by letter dated 20 June 2006, RAI-Radiotelevisione Italiana by letter dated 23 June 2006, and Sky Italia by letter dated 26 June).
Komisija je prejela pripombe naslednjih zainteresiranih strank: Nacionalnega združenja elektronskih in elektrotehničnih družb (ANIE) z dopisom z dne 19. junija 2006, družbe Europa 7 z dopisom z dne 19. junija 2006, Združenja evropskih satelitskih operaterjev (ESOA) z dopisom z dne 20. junija 2006, družbe Mediaset SpA z dopisom z dne 20. junija 2006, javne radiotelevizije RAI – Radiotelevisione Italiana z dopisom z dne 23. junija 2006 in družbe Sky Italia z dopisom z dne 26. junija 2006.
By letter dated 12 July 2006, the Commission forwarded those observations to Italy. Italy did not comment on these observations.
Komisija je te pripombe z dopisom z dne 12. julija 2006 posredovala Italiji, ki nanje ni odgovorila.
The subject-matter of the formal investigation procedure is Article 4(1) of Law No 350/2003 (2004 Finance Act), the interministerial Decree of 30 December 2003 on the grant for digital terrestrial television and for internet broadband access pursuant to Article 4(1) and (2) of Law No 350 of 24 December 2003 and paragraph 211 of Law No 311/2004 (2005 Finance Act).
Predmet formalnega postopka preiskave je člen 4(1) zakona št. 350/2003 (finančni zakon za leto 2004), medresorska uredba z dne 30. decembra 2003 o nepovratnih sredstvih za digitalno prizemno televizijo in širokopasovni internetni dostop v skladu s členom 4(1) in (2) zakona št. 350 z dne 24. decembra 2003, in odstavek 211 zakona št. 311/2004 (finančni zakon za leto 2005).
The Article in question states that:
Zadevni člen navaja, da:
Article 4(4) specifies that: ‘the grant for the purchase or rental of boxes using C-DVB technology shall be awarded only on condition that the commercial offer clearly indicates to the user the content providers with whom the owners of the cable platform have agreed terms and conditions for the cable retransmission of the signal using digital terrestrial technology’.
Člen 4(4) določa, da se nepovratna sredstva za nakup ali najem sprejemnikov, ki uporabljajo tehnologijo C-DVB, dodelijo samo pod pogojem, da so v komercialni ponudbi uporabniku jasno navedeni ponudniki vsebin, s katerimi so se lastniki kabelske platforme dogovorili o pogojih kabelske retransmisije signala z uporabo digitalne prizemne tehnologije.
According to Italy, the subsidy is granted to consumers for purchasing or leasing a decoder that allows the reception of a non-encrypted digital signal at no cost to the consumer and the content provider.
Po besedah Italije se subvencija dodeli uporabnikom za nakup ali najem sprejemnika, ki omogoča sprejem nekodiranega digitalnega signala „brezplačno za uporabnika in ponudnika vsebin“.
Again according to Italy, reception of non-encrypted digital signal means the decoder's capacity to execute any interactive service provided by any broadcaster.
Italija tudi meni, da sprejem nekodiranega digitalnega signala pomeni sposobnost sprejemnika, da izvrši katere koli interaktivne storitve, ki jih ponuja kateri koli izdajatelj televizijskega programa.
In essence this means that the decoder must permit non-encrypted interactive functions (i.e. it must not only be interactive but it must also allow interoperability).
To v bistvu pomeni, da mora sprejemnik omogočati nekodirane interaktivne funkcije (tj. poleg tega, da mora biti interaktiven, mora omogočati tudi medobratovalnost).
These are decoders with an open standard for the application programming interface (API) of which the Multimedia Home Platform (MHP) is almost the sole example.
To so sprejemniki z odprtim standardom za vmesnike aplikacijskih programov (API), izmed katerih je multimedijska domača platforma (Multimedia Home Platform – MHP) skoraj edini primer.
Paragraph 211 of the 2005 Finance Act refinanced the measure with the same spending limit of EUR 110 million, but with a grant per decoder of EUR 70. The scheme in question ceased to apply on 1 December 2005.
Odstavek 211 finančnega zakona za leto 2005 je refinanciral ukrep z isto omejeno porabo v višini 110 milijonov EUR, vendar s subvencijo za sprejemnik v višini 70 EUR. Zadevna shema pomoči je prenehala veljati 1. decembra 2005.
This figure represents 50 % of the decoders sold up to November 2005.
Ta številka predstavlja 50 % vseh sprejemnikov, ki so bili prodani do konca novembra 2005.
The other 50 % were purchased by consumers without the grant, even though the decoders were of the type eligible for it.
Preostalih 50 % sprejemnikov so uporabniki kupili brez subvencije, čeprav so bili sprejemniki take vrste, ki je bila upravičena do subvencije.
Thanks to the economies of scale in production resulting from this increase in demand, the consumer price of interactive decoders has also decreased from EUR 300/EUR 350 to around EUR 150.
Zaradi ekonomije obsega proizvodnje, ki je posledica večjega povpraševanja, se je tudi maloprodajna cena interaktivnih sprejemnikov znižala s 300 EUR/350 EUR na okoli 150 EUR.
In 2006 the two measures in question were followed by a similar measure under Article 1(572) of Law No 266/2005 of 23 December 2005 (2006 Finance Act).
Leta 2006 je zadevnima ukrepoma sledil podoben ukrep na podlagi člena 1(572) zakona št. 266/2005 z dne 23. decembra 2005 (finančni zakon za leto 2006).
This provides for a subsidy of EUR 90 for each decoder purchased by users in Sardinia and Valle d'Aosta between 1 December and 31 December 2005 and of EUR 70 for each decoder purchased as of 1 January 2006.
Ta ukrep predvideva subvencijo v višini 90 EUR za vsak sprejemnik, ki ga kupijo uporabniki na Sardiniji in v Dolini Aoste med 1. decembrom in 31. decembrom 2005, in subvencijo v višini 70 EUR za vsak sprejemnik, kupljen od 1. januarja 2006.
Compared to the 2004/2005 measures, the 2006 Finance Act directly links the subsidy to the interoperability of decoders without a priori excluding non-terrestrial decoders.
V primerjavi z ukrepi iz obdobja 2004/2005 finančni zakon za leto 2006 neposredno povezuje subvencijo z medobratovalnostjo sprejemnikov, ne da bi vnaprej izključil neprizemne sprejemnike.
In its decision of 11 May 2006, the Italian competition authority, AGCM, rejected a complaint against Article 1(572) of the 2006 Finance Act.
V svojem sklepu z dne 11. maja 2006 je italijanski organ, pristojen za konkurenco, AGCM, zavrnil pritožbo zoper člen 1(572) finančnega zakona za leto 2006.
The complaint alleged that the measure favoured companies linked to Mr Berlusconi ' s family.
V pritožbi je bilo navedeno, da ukrep daje prednost družbam, ki so povezane z družino g. Berlusconija.
The proceeding was based on Law No 215 of 20 July 2004 on conflict of interest.
Postopek je temeljil na zakonu št. 215 z dne 20. julija 2004 o navzkrižju interesov.
THE COMPLAINANTS
PRITOŽNIKI
Europa 7 is an Italian company that has held an analogue broadcasting licence since 1999.
Družba Europa 7 je italijanska družba, ki ima licenco za analogno radiodifuzijo od leta 1999.
However, it has not yet been able to operate in the analogue broadcasting market, allegedly due to the behaviour of the national authorities, which have not yet allocated the frequencies Europa 7 needs in order to broadcast.
Družba pa še vedno ne more delovati na trgu analogne radiodifuzije, domnevno zaradi ravnanja nacionalnih organov, ki družbi Europa 7 še vedno niso dodelili frekvenc, ki jih potrebuje za oddajanje.
Sky Italia is a pay-TV company that broadcasts via satellite, owned by News Corporation.
Družba Sky Italia je plačljiva televizijska družba, ki oddaja prek satelita in je v lasti družbe News Corporation.
It was formed as a result of News Corporation's take-over of Telepiù SpA and Stream SpA in 2003, a merger which was approved subject to certain commitments (Case No COMP/M.2876 Newscorp/Telepiù).
Ustanovljena je bila po tem, ko je družba News Corporation leta 2003 prevzela družbi Telepiù S.p.A in Stream S.p.A, ta združitev pa je bila odobrena na podlagi določenih zavez (zadeva št. COMP/M.2876 Newscorp/Telepiù).
THE CONTEXT
OKVIR
The measure in question must be viewed against the backdrop of the digitisation of broadcasting, which has an impact on all the currently available transmission platforms, i.e. cable, satellite and terrestrial.
Zadevni ukrep je treba obravnavati v okviru digitalizacije radiodifuzije, ki vpliva na vse trenutno razpoložljive prenosne platforme, tj. kabelsko, satelitsko in prizemno.
Digital video broadcasting can be over a terrestrial network (DVB-T) or by satellite (DVB-S) or cable (DVB-C).
Digitalna videoradiodifuzija lahko poteka prek prizemnega omrežja (DVB-T), satelita (DVB-S) ali kabla (DVB-C).
Between 2002 and 2005, the Commission actively expressed its support for the digitisation of broadcasting, adopting several communications on this subject.
Med letoma 2002 in 2005 je Komisija dejavno izražala svojo podporo digitalizaciji radiodifuzije in na to temo sprejela več sporočil.
In these communications the Commission also supported the diffusion of so-called ‘open standards’ digital technologies, i.e. technologies allowing interactivity with final consumers and interoperability through open API, i.e. the possibility for different producers and consumers to be connected together via a single technology that can be freely used by every operator in the market.
Komisija je v teh sporočilih podprla tudi razširjanje tako imenovanih digitalnih tehnologij „odprtih standardov“, tj. tehnologij, ki omogočajo interaktivnost s končnimi uporabniki in medobratovalnost prek odprtega vmesnika aplikacijskih programov (API), tj. možnost, da so različni proizvajalci in uporabniki povezani prek ene same tehnologije, ki jo lahko svobodno uporabljajo vsi operaterji na trgu.
The viewing of digital programmes through the most commonly used television sets requires the use of a decoder (although some of the more modern TV sets have an integrated decoder).
Gledanje digitalnih programov prek najpogosteje uporabljanih televizorjev zahteva uporabo sprejemnika (čeprav imajo nekateri sodobnejši televizorji že vgrajen sprejemnik).
There are various types of digital decoders on the market, which can broadly be classified by their features and functions: (a) simple decoding of digital programmes, on either the terrestrial or satellite platform; (b) interactivity (possibility of sending information to the broadcasters); (c) conditional access (possibility of decoding pay-TV services); (d) interoperability (the possibility of using the same decoders to receive programmes from different broadcasters on the same platform).
Na trgu obstajajo različni digitalni sprejemniki, ki jih je mogoče na splošno razvrstiti glede na njihove značilnosti in funkcije: (a) enostavno odkodiranje digitalnih programov bodisi na prizemni ali satelitski platformi; (b) interaktivnost (možnost pošiljanja informacij izdajateljem televizijskega programa); (c) pogojni dostop (možnost odkodiranja plačljivih televizijskih storitev); (d) medobratovalnost (možnost uporabe istih sprejemnikov za sprejem programov različnih izdajateljev televizijskega programa na isti platformi).
In principle, decoders could offer various combinations of the above features; in practice, however, the most widespread categories of decoders are: (a) zappers (just the decoding function); (b) proprietary Sky decoders (interactive, with conditional access, but not open) and (c) subsidised decoders (interactive, with conditional access and open).
Sprejemniki bi načeloma lahko ponujali različne kombinacije zgoraj navedenih lastnosti, v praksi pa so najbolj razširjene kategorije sprejemnikov naslednje: (a) zapperji (samo odkodirna funkcija); (b) zaščiteni sprejemniki Sky (interaktivni, s pogojnim dostopom, ki pa niso odprti) in (c) subvencionirani sprejemniki (interaktivni, s pogojnim dostopom in odprti).