natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission Decision 2005/170/EC (OJ L 56, 2.3.2005, p. 15).
Odločba Komisije 2005/170/ES (UL L 56, 2.3.2005, str. 15).
Decision No 1364/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 laying down guidelines for trans-European energy networks and repealing Decision 96/391/EC and Decision No 1229/2003/EC (OJ L 262, 22.9.2006, p. 1).
Odločba št. 1364/2006/ES Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. septembra 2006 o določitvi smernic za vseevropska energetska omrežja in razveljavitvi Odločbe 96/391/ES in Odločbe št. 1229/2003/ES (UL L 262, 22.9.2006, str. 1).
However, a general decline of the Bavarian petrochemical industry is unlikely.
Vsekakor pa je splošen propad bavarske petrokemične industrije zelo neverjeten.
Therefore, eventual advantages are too uncertain to rely upon in assessing the aid.
Iz tega razloga so morebitne koristi preveč negotove, da bi jih bilo mogoče pozitivno upoštevati pri presoji pomoči.
Furthermore, the impact on the ethylene market will be concentrated in Germany, the notifying Member State.
Poleg tega se bodo učinki na trg etilena osredotočili na Nemčijo, tj. na državo članico priglasiteljico.
Effects along the pipeline network in Belgium and the Netherlands will be indirect and may also concern plants of the beneficiaries, notably BASF’s plant in Antwerp.
Učinki vzdolž cevovodnega omrežja v Belgiji in na Nizozemskem bodo posredni in bi lahko prav tako vplivali na obrate prejemnice, zlasti tovarno družbe BASF v Antwerpnu.
Ethylene is an anaesthetic, asphyxiant and highly inflammable gas that explodes on contact with the air.
Etilen je anestezijski, zadušljiv in močno vnetljiv plin, ki z zrakom tvori eksplozivno mešanico.
However, Article 80 of the Treaty limits the provisions in the transport chapter by stating that ‘The provisions of this Title shall apply to transport by rail, road and inland waterway.’ Article 73 does not, therefore, apply to the present case.
Člen 80 Pogodbe ES pa omejuje področje uporabe določb v poglavju Promet: „Določbe tega naslova se uporabljajo za prevoz v železniškem in cestnem prometu ter po celinskih plovnih poteh.“ Člen 73 v pričujočem primeru posledično ni uporaben.
It is classified in the highest hazard class.
Uvrščamo ga v razred najbolj nevarnih snovi.
of 5 June 2007
z dne 5. junija 2007
determining the quantities of methyl bromide permitted to be used for critical uses in the Community from 1 January to 31 December 2007 under Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer
o določitvi količin metilbromida, dovoljenih za nujno uporabo v Skupnosti od 1. januarja do 31. decembra 2007 v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2037/2000 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o snoveh, ki tanjšajo ozonski plašč
(notified under document number C(2007) 2295)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 2295)
(Only the Dutch, French, Italian, Polish and Spanish texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v nizozemskem, francoskem, italijanskem, poljskem in španskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer [1] and in particular Article 3(2)(ii) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 2037/2000 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. junija 2000 o snoveh, ki tanjšajo ozonski plašč [1] in zlasti člena 3(2)(ii) Uredbe,
Articles 3(2)(i)(d) and 4(2)(i)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 prohibit the production, import and placing on the market of methyl bromide for all uses after 31 December 2004 except, among others [2], for critical uses in accordance with Article 3(2)(ii) and the criteria set out in Decision IX/6 of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol, together with any other relevant criteria agreed by the Parties.
Člen 3(2)(i)(d) in člen 4(2)(i)(d) Uredbe (ES) št. 2037/2000 prepovedujeta proizvodnjo, uvoz in dajanje v promet metilbromida za vse uporabe po 31. decembru 2004, razen, med drugim [2], za nujno uporabo v skladu s členom 3(2)(ii) in merili, določenimi s Sklepom IX/6 pogodbenic Montrealskega protokola, skupaj z drugimi pomembnimi kriteriji, o katerih so se dogovorile pogodbenice.
Decision IX/6 states that methyl bromide should qualify as ‘critical’ only if the applicant determines that the lack of availability of methyl bromide for that specific use would result in a significant market disruption; and that there are no technically and economically feasible alternatives or substitutes available to the user that are acceptable from the standpoint of environment and health and are suitable to the crops and circumstances of the nomination.
Sklep IX/6 navaja, da je metilbromid upravičen kot „nujen“ samo, če vlagatelj zahtevka oceni, da bi nerazpoložljivost metilbromida za zadevno uporabo povzročila pomembnejše motnje na trgu in če uporabniku niso na voljo nobene druge tehnično ali ekonomsko izvedljive možnosti, sprejemljive z vidika okolja in zdravja ter primerne za pridelke in okoliščine iz zahtevka.
An applicant should also demonstrate that an appropriate effort is being made to evaluate, commercialise and secure national regulatory approval of alternatives and substitutes; and that research programmes are in place to develop and deploy alternatives and substitutes.
Vlagatelj zahtevka mora prav tako dokazati, da si je ustrezno prizadeval za ovrednotenje, trženje in odobritev drugih možnosti in nadomestkov s strani nacionalnega regulativnega organa ter da se izvajajo raziskovalni programi za razvoj in uporabo drugih možnosti in nadomestkov.
The Commission received 40 proposals for critical uses of methyl bromide from six Member States including France (70900 kg), Italy (640000 kg), Poland (27900 kg), Spain (322840 kg), The Netherlands (120 kg) and the United Kingdom (10049 kg).
Komisija je prejela 40 predlogov za nujno uporabo metilbromida iz šestih držav članic, vključno s Francijo (70900 kg), Italijo (640000 kg), Poljsko (27900 kg), Španijo (322840 kg), Nizozemsko (120 kg) in Združenim kraljestvom (10049 kg).
A total of 1071809 kg was requested.
Zahtevki se nanašajo na skupaj 1071809 kg.
The Commission applied the criteria contained within Decision IX/6 and Article 3(2)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 in order to determine the amount of methyl bromide that is eligible to be licensed for critical uses in 2007.
Komisija je za določitev količine metilbromida, upravičenega do dovoljenja za nujno uporabo v letu 2007, uporabila merila iz Sklepa IX/6 in člena 3(2)(ii) Uredbe (ES) št. 2037/2000.
The Commission in consultation with Member States found that adequate alternatives were available in the Community and had become more prevalent in many Parties to the Montreal Protocol in the period since the critical use proposals were compiled by Member States.
Komisija je v posvetovanjih z državami članicami ugotovila, da so v Skupnosti obstajale ustrezne druge možnosti, ki so jih mnoge pogodbenice Montrealskega protokola vse pogosteje uporabljale, odkar so države članice pripravile predloge za nujno uporabo.
As a result, the Commission determined that 521836 kg of methyl bromide can be used in 2007 to satisfy critical uses in each of the Member States that had requested the use of methyl bromide.
Zato je Komisija presodila, da se v letu 2007 lahko uporabi 521836 kg metilbromida za zadovoljitev nujne uporabe v vsaki navedeni državi članici, ki je zahtevala njegovo uporabo.
This amount equates to 2,7 % of 1991 consumption of methyl bromide in the European Community and indicates that more than 97,3 % of the methyl bromide has been replaced by alternatives.
Ta količina je enaka 2,7 % uporabe metilbromida v Evropski skupnosti v letu 1991, kar pomeni, da so več kot 97,3 % metilbromida zamenjale druge snovi.
The critical-use categories are similar to those defined in Table A of Decision XVIII/13 at the Eighteenth Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol [3].
Kategorije nujne uporabe so podobne kategorijam, ki so določene v tabeli A iz Sklepa XVIII/13 z osemnajstega srečanja pogodbenic Montrealskega protokola [3].
As Article 17(2) requires Member States to define the minimum qualification requirements for personnel involved in the application of methyl bromide and, as fumigation is the only use, the Commission determined that methyl bromide fumigators are the only users proposed by the Member State and authorised by the Commission to use methyl bromide for critical uses.
Člen 17(2) zahteva, da države članice določijo minimalne zahteve za usposobljenost osebja, ki uporablja metilbromid; ker se uporablja le za zaplinjevanje, je Komisija določila, da so zaplinjevalci edini uporabniki metilbromida, ki jih predlagajo države članice in odobri Komisija.
Fumigators are qualified to apply it safely; Member States have put in place procedures to identify fumigators within their territory that are permitted to use methyl bromide for critical uses.
Zaplinjevalci morajo biti usposobljeni za varno uporabo; države članice so vzpostavile postopke za določitev zaplinjevalcev na njihovem ozemlju, ki lahko uporabljajo metilbromid za nujno uporabo.
In accordance with Decision IX/6 and Article 3(2)(ii), the Commission determined that 31605 kg of stocks are available for critical uses.
V skladu s Sklepom IX/6 in členom 3(2)(ii) je Komisija odločila, da je za nujno uporabo na voljo 31605 kg zalog.
Therefore, in addition to producers and importers, fumigators that are registered by the Commission in 2007 would be allowed to place methyl bromide on the market, and to use it for critical uses, after 31 December 2006.
Zato je poleg proizvajalcev in uvoznikov tudi zaplinjevalcem, ki so registrirani pri Komisiji v letu 2007, dovoljeno dajati v promet metilbromid in ga uporabljati za nujne potrebe po 31. decembru 2006.
A fumigator typically requests an importer for both the importation and supply of methyl bromide.
Zaplinjevalec običajno zahteva enega uvoznika za uvoz in dobavo metilbromida.
Fumigators registered for critical uses by the Commission in 2006 would be permitted to carry over to 2007 any remaining methyl bromide that had not been used in 2006 (referred to as ‘stocks’).
Zaplinjevalcem, registriranim pri Komisiji v letu 2006, je za nujne uporabe dovoljeno v leto 2007 prenesti preostale količine metilbromidov, ki niso bile uporabljene v letu 2006 (imenovane „zaloge“).
The European Commission has put in place licensing procedures to deduct such stocks of methyl bromide before any additional methyl bromide is imported or produced to meet the licensed requests for critical uses in 2007.
Evropska Komisija je vzpostavila postopke za izdajo dovoljenj za zmanjšanje zalog metilbromida, preden se uvozi ali proizvede dodatni metilbromid, da se izpolni zahteve za dovoljenja za nujne uporabe v letu 2007.
As critical uses of methyl bromide apply from 1 January 2007, and for the purpose of ensuring that interested companies and operators may benefit from the licensing system, it is appropriate that this present decision shall apply from that date.
Ker nujne uporabe metilbromida veljajo od 1. januarja 2007 in da zainteresirane družbe in izvajalci lahko koristijo ugodnosti sistema izdaje dovoljenj, je primerno, da se ta odločba uporablja od navedenega datuma.
The Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Republic of Poland shall be permitted to use a total of 521836 kg of methyl bromide for critical uses from 1 January to 31 December 2007 for the specific quantities and categories of use described in Annexes I to V.
Kraljevini Španiji, Francoski republiki, Italijanski republiki, Kraljevini Nizozemski in Republiki Poljski se dovoli skupno 521836 kg metilbromida za nujno uporabo od 1. januarja do 31. decembra 2007 za posebne količine in kategorije uporabe, navedene v prilogah I do V.
This Decision shall apply from 1 January 2007 and shall expire on 31 December 2007.
Ta odločba se uporablja od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2007.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Republic of Poland.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Kraljevino Španijo, Francosko republiko, Italijansko republiko, Kraljevino Nizozemsko in Republiko Poljsko.
Done at Brussels, 5 June 2007.
V Bruslju, 5. junija 2007
Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006 (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1791/2006 (UL L 363, 20.12.2006, str. 1).
Other uses are for quarantine and pre-shipment, as feedstock and for laboratory and analytical uses.
Druge uporabe so uporaba za karanteno in predodpremo, kot surovina ter za laboratorijsko in analitično uporabo.
UNEP/OzL.Pro.18/10: Report of the Eighteenth Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, held 30 October-3 November 2006 in New Delhi. www.unep.org/ozone/Meeting_Documents/mop/index.asp
UNEP/OzL.Pro.18/10: Poročilo o osemnajstem srečanju pogodbenic Montrealskega protokola o snoveh, ki tanjšajo ozonski plašč, ki je bilo od 30. oktobra do 3. novembra 2006 v New Delhiju. www.unep.org/ozone/Meeting_Documents/mop/index.asp
Strawberry runners (Grown at high elevations)
Sadike jagod (gojene na višjih legah)
Cut-flowers (Andalucia and Catalonia)
Rezano cvetje (Andaluzija, Katalonija)
Strawberry fruit (research only)
Jagode (le za raziskave)
Pepper (research only)
Paprika (le za raziskave)
Stocks of methyl bromide available for critical uses in the Member State = 18090 kg
Zaloga metilbromida za nujno uporabo v državi članici = 18090 kg
Cut-flowers: Ranunculus, Anemone, Paeonia and Lily of the Valley open-field
Rezano cvetje: ripeče zlatice, vetrnice, potonike in šmarnice - na prostem
Stocks of methyl bromide available for critical uses in the Member State = 392 kg
Zaloga metilbromida za nujno uporabo v državi članici = 392 kg.
Cutflower
Rezano cvetje
Stocks of methyl bromide available for critical uses in the Member State = 12893 kg
Zaloga metilbromida za nujno uporabo v državi članici = 12893 kg
Postharvest disinfestation of strawberry runners
Dezinsekcija sadik jagod po obiranju
Stocks of methyl bromide available for this critical use in the Member State = 25 kg
Zaloga metilbromida za nujno uporabo v državi članici = 25 kg.
Cocoa and coffee beans
Zrna kakava in kave
Stocks of methyl bromide available for critical uses in the Member State = 205 kg
Zaloga metilbromida za nujno uporabo v državi članici = 205 kg.
of 6 June 2007
z dne 6. junija 2007
concerning the non-inclusion of dichlorvos in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance
o nevključitvi diklorvosa v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o preklicu registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo navedeno snov
(notified under document number C(2007) 2338)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 2338)
That list includes dichlorvos.
Navedeni seznam vključuje diklorvos.
For dichlorvos the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed in accordance with the provisions laid down in Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 and (EC) No 703/2001 for a range of uses proposed by the notifier.
Vplivi diklorvosa na zdravje ljudi in okolje so bili ocenjeni v skladu z določbami uredb (ES) št. 451/2000 in (ES) št. 703/2001 za vrste uporab, ki jih je predlagal prijavitelj.
For dichlorvos the rapporteur Member State was Italy and all relevant information was submitted on 20 October 2003.
Država članica poročevalka za diklorvos je bila Italija, vse ustrezne informacije pa so bile predložene 20. oktobra 2003.
The assessment report was peer reviewed by the Member States and the EFSA and presented to the Commission on 12 May 2006 in the format of the EFSA conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance dichlorvos [4].
Poročilo o oceni so pregledali strokovnjaki držav članic in EFSA ter ga 12. maja 2006 predložili Komisiji v obliki sklepa EFSA o strokovnem pregledu ocene tveganja pesticidov z aktivno snovjo diklorvos [4].
This report was reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 29 September 2006 in the format of the Commission review report for dichlorvos.
To poročilo so države članice in Komisija pregledale v okviru Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter končno različico pripravile 29. septembra 2006 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu glede diklorvosa.
In particular, based on the available toxicological data and taking into account the uncertainties of the genotoxic and carcinogenic properties of the substance also considering the overall poor quality of the dossier, it has not been demonstrated that the estimated operator, worker and bystander exposure, is acceptable.
Na podlagi razpoložljivih toksikoloških podatkov ter ob upoštevanju genotoksičnih in rakotvornih lastnosti snovi ter slabe kakovosti dokumentacije se predvidena izpostavljenost izvajalcev tretiranj, delavcev in drugih navzočih oseb ni izkazala za sprejemljivo.
However, despite the arguments advanced, the above concerns remained unsolved, and assessments made on the basis of the information submitted and evaluated during the EFSA expert meetings have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing dichlorvos satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Toda kljub predloženim argumentom se navedenih pomislekov ni dalo odpraviti, po ocenah, nastalih na podlagi predloženih informacij, preučenih na srečanjih strokovnjakov EFSA, pa ne kaže pričakovati, da bi lahko fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo diklorvos, pod predvidenimi pogoji uporabe na splošno izpolnjevala zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
Dichlorvos should therefore not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Diklorvos se zato ne sme vključiti v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Measures should be taken to ensure that authorisations granted for plant protection products containing dichlorvos are withdrawn within a fixed period of time and are not renewed and that no new authorisations for such products are granted.
Sprejeti je treba ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo diklorvos, prekličejo v predpisanem roku in se ne podaljšajo ali izdajo nove registracije za taka sredstva.
Any period of grace granted by a Member State for the disposal, storage, placing on the market and use of existing stocks of plant protection products containing dichlorvos, should be limited to twelve months in order to allow existing stocks to be used in one further growing season.
Če države članice odobrijo podaljšanje roka za odstranjevanje, skladiščenje, dajanje v promet in uporabo obstoječih zalog fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo diklorvos, ga je treba omejiti na obdobje dvanajstih mesecev, da se omogoči uporaba obstoječih zalog v naslednji rastni sezoni.
This decision does not prejudice the submission of an application for dichlorvos according to the provisions of Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC in view of a possible inclusion in its Annex I.
Ta odločba ne vpliva na predložitev zahtevka za diklorvos v skladu z določbami člena 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS zaradi morebitne vključitve v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi.
Dichlorvos shall not be included as an active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Diklorvos se ne vključi kot aktivna snov v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
authorisations for plant protection products containing dichlorvos are withdrawn by 6 December 2007;
se registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo diklorvos, prekličejo do 6. decembra 2007;
no authorisations for plant protection products containing dichlorvos are granted or renewed from the date of publication of this Decision.
se od datuma objave te odločbe registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo diklorvos, ne odobrijo ali podaljšajo.
Any period of grace granted by Member States in accordance with the provisions of Article 4(6) of Directive 91/414/EEC, shall be as short as possible and shall expire on 6 December 2008 at the latest.
Morebitno podaljšanje roka, ki ga odobrijo države članice v skladu z določbami člena 4(6) Direktive 91/414/EGS, je čim krajše in traja največ do 6. decembra 2008.
Done at Brussels, 6 June 2007.
V Bruslju, 6. junija 2007
concerning the non-inclusion of malathion in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance
o nevključitvi malationa v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o preklicu registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo navedeno snov
(notified under document number C(2007) 2337)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 2337)
That list includes malathion.
Navedeni seznam vključuje malation.
For malathion the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed in accordance with the provisions laid down in Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 and (EC) No 703/2001 for a range of uses proposed by the notifier.
Vplivi malationa na zdravje ljudi in okolje so bili ocenjeni v skladu z določbami uredb (ES) št. 451/2000 in (ES) št. 703/2001 za vrste uporab, ki jih je predlagal prijavitelj.
For malathion the rapporteur Member State was Finland and all relevant information was submitted on 2 February 2004.
Država članica poročevalka za malation je bila Finska, vse ustrezne informacije pa so bile predložene 2. februarja 2004.
The assessment report has been peer reviewed by the Member States and the EFSA within its Working Group Evaluation and presented to the Commission on 13 January 2006 in the format of the EFSA conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance malathion [4].
Poročilo o oceni so v okviru delovne skupine za ocenjevanje pregledali strokovnjaki držav članic in EFSA ter ga 13. januarja 2006 predložili Komisiji v obliki sklepa EFSA o strokovnem pregledu ocene nevarnosti pesticidov z aktivno snovjo malation [4].
This report has been reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 29 September 2006 in the format of the Commission review report for malathion.
To poročilo so države članice in Komisija pregledale v okviru Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter končno različico pripravile 29. septembra 2006 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu glede malationa.
Due to the presence of varying levels in the technical material of isomalathion, which is an impurity that contributes significantly to the toxicity profile of malathion and the genotoxicity of which cannot be excluded, the risk to operators, workers and bystanders could not be concluded.
Ker so bile v tehničnem materialu prisotne različne stopnje izomalationa, ki je nečistoča in znatno prispeva k toksičnosti malationa, katerega genotoksičnosti ni možno izključiti, ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, da obstaja tveganje za izvajalce tretiranja, delavce in druge navzoče osebe.
Moreover, based on the available information it has not been demonstrated that the estimated exposure of consumers resulting from the acute and chronic intake of edible crops is acceptable, due to the insufficient information on the effects of certain toxicologically relevant metabolites.
Poleg tega se na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij predvidena izpostavljenost potrošnikov zaradi akutnega ali kroničnega zaužitja rastlinskih proizvodov ni izkazala za sprejemljivo, ker ni dovolj informacij o učinkih nekaterih toksikološko pomembnih metabolitov.
Consequently, it was not possible to conclude on the basis of the information available that malathion met the criteria for inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Zato malation na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij ni izpolnil pogojev za vključitev v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.