natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It results from the justifications put forward by Poland that Polish authorities make no reference to any new information related to the protection of the environment in their notification or in the accompanying explanatory note.
Iz obrazložitev, ki jih je predložila Poljska, je mogoče ugotoviti, da se poljski organi v uradnem obvestilu ali v priloženi pojasnjevalni opombi ne sklicujejo na nove informacije o varstvu okolja.
Their justifications concern broader issues such as the uncertainty surrounding the first stage of research, the conservation of nature and the matter of liability.
Njihove obrazložitve zadevajo širša vprašanja, kot so negotovost v zvezi s prvo fazo raziskav, ohranjanje narave in vprašanja odgovornosti.
There is no reference to any new scientific studies, researches, literature or any other possible findings emerged after the adoption of Directive 2001/18/EC and indicating new evidence concerning the protection of the environment or working environment.
V njih se ne sklicujejo na nove znanstvene študije, raziskave, literaturo ali kakršne koli druge ugotovitve, ki so nastale po sprejetju Direktive 2001/18/ES in vključujejo nova spoznanja o varstvu okolja ali delovnega okolja.
Under those circumstances, in the absence of new scientific element the Commission did not have any reason to submit, the notification to the European Food Safety Authority EFSA and ask its opinion, in accordance with Article 28(2) of Directive 2001/18/EC.
V takšnih okoliščinah in brez novih znanstvenih spoznanj Komisija ni imela razloga za predložitev uradnega obvestila Evropski agenciji za varnost hrane in za to, da bi jo prosila za mnenje v skladu s členom 28(2) Direktive 2001/18/ES.
Given the fact that the submission of new scientific evidence constitutes a cumulative condition for the fulfillment of the requirements of Article 95(5) EC Treaty, their absence has as consequence the rejection of the notification without the need to further examine the fulfillment of other conditions.
Glede na to, da je predložitev novih znanstvenih spoznanj kumulativni pogoj za izpolnitev zahtev iz člena 95(5) Pogodbe ES, se zaradi njihove odsotnosti uradno obvestilo zavrne in izpolnjevanja drugih pogojev ni treba dodatno preučiti.
Article 95(5) of the EC Treaty requires that, if a Member State deems it necessary to introduce national provisions in derogation from Community harmonisation measures, the national provisions must be justified by new scientific evidence relating to the protection of environment or the working environment, there must be a problem specific to the Member State making the request, and the problem must have arisen after the adoption of the harmonisation measure.
Če država članica meni, da je treba z odstopanjem od usklajevalnih ukrepov Skupnosti uvesti nacionalne določbe, morajo biti nacionalne določbe v skladu s členom 95(5) Pogodbe ES utemeljene z novimi znanstvenimi spoznanji o varstvu okolja ali delovnega okolja ter mora obstajati problem, ki je specifičen za zadevno državo članico, ki je predložila zahtevo, in je posledica sprejetja usklajevalnega ukrepa.
The Polish notification does not provide any new scientific evidence relating to the protection of the environment or the working environment, which could arose following the adoption of Directive 2001/18/EC, on the deliberate release into the environment of GMOs, and which makes it necessary to introduce the notified national measures.
Uradno obvestilo Poljske ne zagotavlja novih znanstvenih spoznanj o varstvu okolja ali delovnega okolja, ki bi jih lahko ugotovili po sprejetju Direktive 2001/18/ES o namernem sproščanju gensko spremenjenih organizmov v okolje in zaradi katerih bi bilo treba uvesti priglašene nacionalne ukrepe.
Consequently, the request from Poland for introducing Articles 111(2)(5, 6) and 172 aimed at derogating from the provisions of Directive 2001/18/EC concerning the experimental release and cultivation of GMOs in Poland does not fulfill the conditions set out in Article 95(5).
Zato zahteva Poljske za uvedbo člena 111(2)(5) in (6) ter člena 172, namenjena odstopanju od določb iz Direktive 2001/18/ES v zvezi s poskusnim sproščanjem in gojenjem GSO na Poljskem, ne izpolnjuje pogojev iz člena 95(5).
In light of the elements which it had available to assess the merits of the justifications put forward for the national measures notified, and in light of the considerations set our above, the Commission considers that Poland’s request for introducing national provisions derogating from Directive 2001/18/EC, submitted on 13 April 2007, does not fulfill the conditions set out in Article 95(5) of the EC Treaty, as Poland did not provide new scientific evidence relating to the protection of the environment or the working environment on grounds of a problem specific to Poland.
Komisija ob upoštevanju elementov, ki so ji bili na voljo za oceno ustreznosti obrazložitev, predloženih za priglašene nacionalne ukrepe, in glede na navedene vidike meni, da zahteva Poljske za uvedbo nacionalnih določb, ki odstopajo od Direktive 2001/18/ES, predložena 13. aprila 2007, ne izpolnjuje pogojev iz člena 95(5) Pogodbe ES, ker Poljska ni zagotovila novih znanstvenih spoznanj o varstvu okolja ali delovnega okolja na podlagi problema, ki je specifičen za Poljsko.
The Commission therefore considers that the national provisions notified cannot be approved in accordance with Article 95(6) of the Treaty,
Komisija zato meni, da priglašenih nacionalnih določb ni mogoče odobriti v skladu s členom 95(5) Pogodbe –
Points 5 and 6 of Article 111(2) and Article 172 of the draft Law on Genetically Modified Organisms notified by Poland pursuant to Article 95(5) of the EC Treaty, are rejected.
Člen 111(2)(5) in (6) ter člen 172 osnutka akta o gensko spremenjenih organizmih, ki jih je Poljska priglasila v skladu s členom 95(5) Pogodbe ES, se zavrneta.
OJ C 173, 26.7.2007, p. 8.
UL C 173, 26.7.2007, str. 8.
The observations were issued from Lithuania, EuropaBio, the European Seed Association and Greenpeace.
Pripombe so poslali Latvija, EuropaBio, Evropsko združenje za semena in Greenpeace.
Observations were also made by individuals, professional associations and Polish institutions.
Poleg tega je pripombe poslalo več posameznikov, strokovnih združenj in ustanov iz Poljske.
Directive as repealed by Directive 2001/18/EC.
Direktiva, razveljavljena z Direktivo 2001/18/ES.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1882/2003 (UL L 284, 31.10.2003, str. 1).
ECR, C-439/05 P and C-454/05 P, points 56-58.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti, zadevi C-439/05 P in C-454/05 P, odstavki 56–58.
In accordance with Article 19 of the Directive (‘Consent’), ‘(…) only if a written consent has been given for the placing on the market of a GMO as or in a product may that product be used without further notification throughout the Community in so far as the specific conditions of use and the environments and/or geographical areas stipulated in these conditions are strictly adhered to.’
V skladu s členom 19 Direktive („Odobritev“) se „[…] samo, če je bila dana pisna odobritev za dajanje v promet GSO kot proizvoda ali v proizvodu, […] ta proizvod lahko brez nadaljnje prijave uporablja v vsej Skupnosti, če se dosledno upoštevajo posebni pogoji uporabe ter okolja in/ali zemljepisna območja, določena v teh pogojih“.
Moreover, Article 22 of the Directive (Free circulation) stipulates that ‘without prejudice to Article 23, Member States may not prohibit, restrict or impede the placing on the market of GMOs, as or in products, which comply with the requirements of this Directive’.
Poleg tega člen 22 Direktive („Prosti promet“) določa, da „brez poseganja v člen 23 države članice ne smejo prepovedati, omejiti ali preprečiti dajanja v promet GSO kot proizvodov ali v proizvodih, kadar izpolnjujejo zahteve te direktive“.
amending Decisions 2002/231/EC, 2002/255/EC, 2002/272/EC, 2002/371/EC, 2003/200/EC and 2003/287/EC in order to prolong the validity of the ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to certain products
o spremembi odločb 2002/231/ES, 2002/255/ES, 2002/272/ES, 2002/371/ES, 2003/200/ES in 2003/287/ES zaradi podaljšanja veljavnosti okoljskih meril za podeljevanje znaka za okolje Skupnosti nekaterim proizvodom
(notified under document number C(2007) 6800)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 6800)
Commission Decision 2002/231/EC of 18 March 2002 establishing revised ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to footwear and amending Decision 1999/179/EC [2] expires on 31 March 2008.
Odločba Komisije 2002/231/ES z dne 18. marca 2002 o določitvi spremenjenih okoljskih meril za podeljevanje znaka za okolje Skupnosti obutvi in o spremembi Odločbe 1999/179/ES [2] preneha veljati 31. marca 2008.
Commission Decision 2002/255/EC of 25 March 2002 establishing ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to televisions [3] expires on 31 March 2008.
Odločba Komisije 2002/255/ES z dne 25. marca 2002 o določitvi okoljskih meril za podeljevanje znaka za okolje Skupnosti televizijskim sprejemnikom [3] preneha veljati 31. marca 2008.
Commission Decision 2002/272/EC of 25 March 2002 establishing criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to hard floor coverings [4] expires on 31 March 2008.
Odločba Komisije 2002/272/ES z dne 25. marca 2002 o uvedbi okoljskih meril za podelitev znaka Skupnosti za okolje trdim talnim oblogam [4] preneha veljati 31. marca 2008.
Commission Decision 2002/371/EC of 15 May 2002 establishing ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to textile products and amending Decision 1999/178/EC [5] expires on 31 May 2008.
Odločba Komisije 2002/371/ES z dne 15. maja 2002 o določitvi okoljskih meril za podelitev znaka za okolje Skupnosti tekstilnim izdelkom in o spremembi Odločbe 1999/178/ES [5] preneha veljati 31. maja 2008.
Commission Decision 2003/200/EC of 14 February 2003 establishing revised ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to laundry detergents and amending Decision 1999/476/EC [6] expires on 29 February 2008.
Odločba Komisije 2003/200/ES z dne 14. februarja 2003 o določitvi spremenjenih okoljskih meril za podelitev znaka Skupnosti za okolje detergentom za perilo in o spremembi Odločbe 1999/476 [6] preneha veljati 29. februarja 2008.
Commission Decision 2003/287/EC of 14 April 2003 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to tourist accommodation service [7] expires on 30 April 2008.
Odločba Komisije 2003/287/ES z dne 14. aprila 2003 o določitvi okoljskih meril za podelitev znaka Skupnosti za okolje turističnim nastanitvenim storitvam [7] preneha veljati 30. aprila 2008.
Given the different stages of the revision process for these Decisions it is appropriate to prolong the period of validity of the ecological criteria and the requirements for Decision 2002/255/EC and Decision 2002/371/EC for a period of 12 months, Decision 2003/287/EC for a period of 18 months, and Decision 2002/231/EC, Decision 2002/272/EC and Decision 2003/200/EC for a period of 24 months.
Glede na različne stopnje postopka pregleda navedenih odločb je primerno, da se podaljša veljavnost okoljskih meril in zahtev iz Odločbe 2002/255/ES in Odločbe 2002/371/ES za 12 mesecev, iz Odločbe 2003/287/ES za 18 mesecev ter iz Odločbe 2002/231/ES, Odločbe 2002/272/ES in Odločbe 2003/200/ES za 24 mesecev.
Since the review obligation pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 concerns only the ecological criteria and assessment and verification requirements, it is appropriate that Decisions 2002/231/EC, 2002/255/EC, 2002/272/EC, 2002/371/EC, 2003/200/EC and 2003/287/EC remain in effect.
Ker je v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1980/2000 obvezen samo pregled okoljskih meril ter zahtev za ocenjevanje in preverjanje, je primerno, da odločbe 2002/231/ES, 2002/255/ES, 2002/272/ES, 2002/371/ES, 2003/200/ES in 2003/287/ES še naprej veljajo.
Decisions 2002/231/EC, 2002/255/EC, 2002/272/EC, 2002/371/EC, 2003/200/EC and 2003/287/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbe 2002/231/ES, 2002/255/ES, 2002/272/ES, 2002/371/ES, 2003/200/ES in 2003/287/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The ecological criteria for the product group footwear, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, shall be valid until 31 March 2010.’
Okoljska merila za skupino proizvodov ‚obutev‘ ter z njimi povezane zahteve za ocenjevanje in preverjanje veljajo do 31. marca 2010.“
The ecological criteria for the product group televisions, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, shall be valid until 31 March 2009.’
Okoljska merila za skupino proizvodov ‚televizijski sprejemniki‘ ter z njimi povezane zahteve za ocenjevanje in preverjanje veljajo do 31. marca 2009.“
The ecological criteria for the product group hard floor coverings, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, shall be valid until 31 March 2010.’
Okoljska merila za skupino proizvodov ‚trde talne obloge‘ ter z njimi povezane zahteve za ocenjevanje in preverjanje veljajo do 31. marca 2010.“
The ecological criteria for the product group textile products, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, shall be valid until 31 May 2009.’
Okoljska merila za skupino proizvodov ‚tekstilni izdelki‘ ter z njimi povezane zahteve za ocenjevanje in preverjanje veljajo do 31. maja 2009.“
Article 5 of Decision 2003/200/EC is replaced by the following:
Člen 5 Odločbe 2003/200/ES se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The ecological criteria for the product group laundry detergents, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, shall be valid until 28 February 2010.’
Okoljska merila za skupino proizvodov ‚detergenti za perilo‘ ter z njimi povezane zahteve za ocenjevanje in preverjanje veljajo do 28. februarja 2010.“
Article 5 of Decision 2003/287/EC is replaced by the following:
Člen 5 Odločbe 2003/287/ES se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The ecological criteria for the product group tourist accommodation service, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, shall be valid until 31 October 2009.’
Okoljska merila za skupino proizvodov ‚turistične nastanitvene storitve‘ ter z njimi povezane zahteve za ocenjevanje in preverjanje veljajo do 31. oktobra 2009.“
Decision as last amended by Decision 2005/783/EC (OJ L 295, 11.11.2005, p. 51).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2005/783/ES (UL L 295, 11.11.2005, str. 51).
Decision as last amended by Decision 2007/207/EC (OJ L 92, 3.4.2007, p. 16).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2007/207/ES (UL L 92, 3.4.2007, str. 16).
Decision as last amended by Decision 2005/783/EC.
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2005/783/ES.
Decision as last amended by Decision 2007/207/EC.
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2007/207/ES.
granting a derogation requested by Belgium with regard to the region of Flanders pursuant to Council Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources
o odobritvi odstopanja, ki ga je zahtevala Belgija glede regije Flandrije na podlagi Direktive Sveta 91/676/EGS o varstvu voda pred onesnaževanjem z nitrati iz kmetijskih virov
(notified under document number C(2007) 6654)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 6654)
If the amount of manure that a Member State intends to apply per hectare each year is different from the one specified in the first sentence of the second subparagraph of paragraph 2 of Annex III to Directive 91/676/EEC and in point (a) thereof, that amount has to be fixed so as not to prejudice the achievement of the objectives specified in Article 1 of that Directive and has to be justified on the basis of objective criteria, such as, in the present case, long growing seasons and crops with high nitrogen uptake.
Če se količina živinskega gnojila, ki ga namerava država članica letno vnesti na hektar, razlikuje od količine iz prvega stavka drugega pododstavka odstavka 2 Priloge III k Direktivi 91/676/EGS in iz točke (a) navedenega pododstavka, mora biti ta količina določena tako, da ne posega v doseganje ciljev iz člena 1 navedene direktive, in upravičena glede na objektivna merila, kot so v tem primeru dolga rastna doba in posevki, ki sprejmejo veliko dušika.
Belgium submitted to the Commission a request for a derogation under the third subparagraph of paragraph 2 of Annex III to Directive 91/676/EEC referred to the region of Flanders.
Belgija je predložila Komisiji zahtevek za odstopanje na podlagi tretjega pododstavka odstavka 2 Priloge III k Direktivi 91/676/EGS v zvezi z regijo Flandrijo.
The requested derogation concerns the intention of Belgium to allow the application in Flanders, in specific holdings, of up to 250 kg nitrogen per hectare per year from livestock manure in parcels cultivated with grassland and maize undersown with grassland and up to 200 kg nitrogen per hectare per year from livestock manure in parcels cultivated with winter wheat followed by a catch crop and with beet.
Zahtevano odstopanje zadeva namen Belgije, da na določenih kmetijskih gospodarstvih v Flandriji dovoli vnos do 250 kg dušika letno iz živinskega gnojila na hektar na poljinah, na katerih se gojita trava in koruza, podsejana s travo, in do 200 kg dušika letno iz živinskega gnojila na hektar na poljinah, na katerih se goji ozimna pšenica, ki ji sledijo naknadni posevki in pesa.
The legislation implementing Directive 91/676/EEC for the region of Flanders, the ‘Decree for the protection of water against pollution by nitrates from agricultural sources’ (Manure Decree) has been adopted on 22 December 2006 [2] and applies equally to the requested derogation.
Zakonodaja o izvajanju Direktive 91/676/EGS za regijo Flandrijo – Odredba o varstvu voda pred onesnaževanjem z nitrati iz kmetijskih virov (Odredba o gnojilih) – je bila sprejeta 22. decembra 2006 [2] in prav tako velja za zahtevano odstopanje.
The Manure Decree applies through the whole territory of Flanders.
Odredba o gnojilih se uporablja na celotnem ozemlju Flandrije.
The legislation implementing Directive 91/676/EEC includes limits for the application of both nitrogen and phosphorus.
Zakonodaja o izvajanju Direktive 91/676/EGS vključuje omejitve vnosa dušika in fosforja.
Phosphorus application with chemical fertilisers, as a rule, is prohibited unless soil analysis is performed and a permit is issued by the competent authority.
Vnos fosforja s kemičnimi gnojili je praviloma prepovedan, razen če se izvede analiza prsti in če pristojni organ izda dovoljenje.
Water quality data submitted show a downwards trend in average groundwater nitrates concentration and in average nutrient concentration, including phosphorus, in surface waters.
Predloženi podatki o kakovosti vode kažejo na zmanjševanje povprečne koncentracije nitratov v podzemni vodi in povprečne koncentracije hranil, vključno s fosforjem, v površinskih vodah.
The application of nitrogen from livestock manure decreased, in the period 1997-2005, from 162 million kg to 122 million kg and the application of phosphorus (P2O5) from livestock manure decreased, in the same period, from 72 million kg to 50 million kg, both as effect of decrease in livestock numbers, low nutrient feeding and manure processing.
Vnos dušika iz živinskega gnojila se je v obdobju 1997–2005 zmanjšal s 162 milijonov kg na 122 milijonov kg, vnos fosforja (P2O5) iz živinskega gnojila pa se je v istem obdobju zmanjšal z 72 milijonov kg na 50 milijonov kg, kar je posledica zmanjšanja števila glav živine, uporabe krme z nizko vsebnostjo hranil in predelave živinskega gnojila.
The use of nitrogen and phosphorus from chemical fertilisers decreased respectively by 44 % and by 82 % since 1991 and it is now corresponding to 57 kg per hectare nitrogen and 6 kg per hectare phosphate.
Uporaba dušika iz kemičnih gnojil se je od leta 1991 zmanjšala za 44 %, vnos fosforja pa za 82 %, tako da se zdaj uporablja 57 kg dušika na hektar in 6 kg fosforja na hektar.
The supporting documents presented in the notification show that the proposed amount of respectively 250 kg and 200 kg per hectare per year nitrogen from livestock manure is justified on the basis of objective criteria such as long growing seasons and crops with high nitrogen uptake.
Spremni dokumenti, ki so predloženi uradnemu obvestilu, kažejo, da je predlagana količina 250 oziroma 200 kg dušika iz živinskega gnojila letno na hektar upravičena na podlagi objektivnih meril, kot so dolga rastna doba in posevki, ki sprejmejo veliko dušika.
The Commission after examination of the request considers that the proposed amounts of respectively 250 kg and 200 kg per hectare per year of nitrogen from livestock manure, will not prejudice the achievement of the objectives of Directive 91/676/EEC, subject to certain strict conditions being met.
Komisija po pregledu zahtevka meni, da predlagani količini 250 in 200 kg dušika iz živinskega gnojila letno na hektar ob upoštevanju nekaterih strogih pogojev ne bosta vplivali na doseganje ciljev iz Direktive 91/676/EGS.
In order to avoid that the application of the requested derogation leads to intensification of livestock rearing, the competent authorities should ensure the limitation of the number of livestock which can be kept in each farm (nutrient emission rights) in the region of Flanders according to the provisions set out in the Manure Decree of 22 December 2006.
Da uporaba zahtevanega odstopanja ne bi povzročila povečane reje živine, morajo pristojni organi omejiti število glav živine na posameznih kmetijah (pravice do emisije hranil) v regiji Flandriji v skladu z določbami iz Odredbe o gnojilih z dne 22. decembra 2006.
This Decision should be applicable in connection with the second action programme in force for the region of Flanders for the period 2007 to 2010 (Manure Decree of 22 December 2006).
Ta odločba se mora uporabljati v povezavi z drugim akcijskim programom, ki se izvaja v regiji Flandriji v obdobju 2007–2010 (Odredba o gnojilih z dne 22. decembra 2006).
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Nitrates Committee set up pursuant to Article 9 of Directive 91/676/EEC,
Ukrepi iz te odločbe so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za nitrate, ki je bil ustanovljen v skladu s členom 9 Direktive 91/676/EGS –
The derogation requested by Belgium by letter of 5 October 2007, with regard to the region of Flanders, for the purpose of allowing a higher amount of livestock manure than that provided for in the first sentence of the second subparagraph of paragraph 2 of Annex III to Directive 91/676/EEC and in point (a) thereof, is granted, subject to the conditions laid down in this Decision.
Odstopanje, ki ga je zahtevala Belgija z dopisom z dne 5. oktobra 2007, v zvezi z dovoljenjem, da regija Flandrija uporabi večje količine živinskega gnojila, kot jih določa prvi stavek drugega pododstavka odstavka 2 Priloge III k Direktivi 91/676/EGS in točka (a) tega stavka, se odobri v skladu s pogoji iz te odločbe.
For the purpose of this decision, the following definitions shall apply:
V tej odločbi se uporabljajo naslednje opredelitve pojmov:
‘farms’ means holdings with or without livestock rearing;
„kmetije“ pomenijo gospodarstva, na katerih se redi živina ali ne;
‘parcel’ means an individual field or a group of fields, homogeneous regarding cropping, soil type and fertilisation practices;
„poljina“ pomeni posamezno polje ali skupino polj, ki so enotna glede posevkov, tipa prsti in praks gnojenja;
‘grassland’ means permanent or temporary grassland (generally temporary lies less than four years);
„travišče“ pomeni trajno ali začasno travišče (začasno travišče običajno leži manj kot štiri leta);
‘crops with high nitrogen demand and long growing season’ means grassland, maize undersown, before or after harvest, with grass mowed and removed from the field acting as a catch crop, winter wheat followed by a catch crop, sugar or fodder beets;
„posevki z visoko porabo dušika in dolgo rastno sezono“ pomenijo travišča, koruzo, ki je pred ali po žetvi podsejana s travo, ki se pokosi in odstrani s polja ter ima vlogo naknadnega posevka, ozimno pšenico, ki ji sledi naknadni posevek, sladkorna ali krmna pesa;