natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The persons listed in the Annex to this Decision shall be removed from the list annexed to Decision 2007/868/EC implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism.
Osebe s seznama iz Priloge k temu sklepu se črtajo s seznama iz Priloge k Sklepu 2007/868/ES o izvajanju člena 2(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 2580/2001 o posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih za nekatere osebe in subjekte zaradi boja proti terorizmu.
Done at Luxembourg, 29 April 2008.
V Luxembourgu, 29. aprila 2008
Regulation as last amended by Decision 2007/868/EC (OJ L 340, 22.12.2007, p. 100).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena s Sklepom 2007/868/ES (UL L 340, 22.12.2007, str. 100).
List of persons referred to in Article 1 of this Decision
Seznam oseb iz člena 1 tega sklepa
On 20 December 2007, the Council adopted Decision 2007/868/EC [2].
Svet je 20. decembra 2007 sprejel Sklep 2007/868/ES o izvajanju člena 2(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 2580/2001 o posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih za nekatere osebe in subjekte zaradi boja proti terorizmu in razveljavitvi Sklepa 2007/445/ES [2].
On 25 February 2008, the Council provided to Mr Jose Maria SISON an updated statement of reasons for maintaining him on the list of persons, groups and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for under Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 and invited Mr SISON to present his observations thereon within one month.
Svet je 25. februarja 2008 g. Joseju Marii SISONU poslal posodobljeno utemeljitev razlogov, zaradi katerih je ostal na seznamu oseb, skupin in organizacij, za katere veljajo omejevalni ukrepi, določeni v Uredbi (ES) št. 2580/2001, in ga pozval, naj v roku enega meseca predloži pripombe o navedenem.
Mr SISON submitted observations to the Council by letter dated 24 March 2008, which the Council has considered.
Jose Maria SISON je v pismu z dne 24. marca 2008 Svetu predložil pripombe, ki jih je ta preučil.
The Council has concluded that Mr SISON has been involved in terrorist acts within the meaning of Article 1(2) and (3) of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism [3] and that decisions have been taken in respect of Mr SISON by a competent national authority within the meaning of Article 1(4) of that Common Position.
Svet je ugotovil, da je bil g. Jose Maria SISON povezan s terorističnimi dejanji v smislu člena 1(2) in (3) Skupnega stališča Sveta 2001/931/SZVP z dne 27. decembra 2001 o uporabi posebnih ukrepov za boj proti terorizmu [3] in da so v zvezi z njim pristojni nacionalni organi sprejeli odločitve v smislu člena 1(4) navedenega skupnega stališča.
The Council has also concluded that the entries for Mr SISON and for the Communist Party of the Philippines on the list of persons, groups and entities to which Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 applies should be amended so as to reflect the updated statement of reasons.
Svet je tudi sklenil, da bi bilo treba spremeniti vnosa o g. Joseju Marii SISONU in Komunistični partiji Filipinov, navedena na seznamu oseb, skupin in organizacij, za katere se uporablja Uredba (ES) št. 2580/2001, da bi te spremembe odražale posodobljeno utemeljitev razlogov.
The Council therefore considers that Mr SISON should continue to be subject to the specific restrictive measures provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001,
Svet zato meni, da bi za g. Joseja Mario SISONA še vedno morali veljati posebni omejevalni ukrepi iz Uredbe (ES) št. 2580/2001 –
In the Annex to Decision 2007/868/EC, the entry for Mr SISON, Jose Maria (a.k.a. Armando Liwanag, a.k.a. Joma), shall be replaced by the following:
V Prilogi k Sklepu 2007/868/ES se vnos za SISONA, Joseja Mario (alias Armanda Liwanaga, alias Jomo), nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘SISON, Jose Maria (a.k.a Armando Liwanag, a.k.a. Joma), born 8.2.1939 in Cabugao (Philippines) — person playing a leading role in the “Communist Party of the Philippines”, including the “NPA” ’.
„SISON, Jose Maria (alias Armando Liwanag, alias Joma), rojen 8.2.1939 v Cabugau, Filipini – ima vodilno vlogo v ‚Komunistični partiji Filipinov‘, vključno z ‚NPA‘“.
In the Annex to Decision 2007/868/EC the entry for the Communist Party of the Philippines shall be replaced by the following:
V Prilogi k Sklepu 2007/868/ES se vnos za Komunistično partijo Filipinov nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘ “Communist Party of the Philippines”, including the “New People’s Army” — “NPA”, Philippines, linked to SISON, Jose Maria (a.k.a Armando Liwanag, a.k.a. Joma, who plays a leading role in the “Communist Party of the Philippines”, including the “NPA”)’.
„‚Komunistična partija Filipinov‘ (Communist Party of the Philippines), vključno z ‚Novo ljudsko vojsko‘ (New People's Army – NPA), Filipini, povezana s SISONOM, Josejem Mario (alias Armandom Liwanagom, alias Jomom, ki ima vodilno vlogo v ‚Komunistični partiji Filipinov‘, vključno z ‚NPA‘)“.
This Decision shall take effect on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta sklep začne učinkovati na dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
OJ L 340, 22.12.2007, p. 100.
UL L 340, 22.12.2007, str. 100.
Common Position as last amended by Common Position 2007/871/CFSP (OJ L 340, 22.12.2007, p. 109).
Skupno stališče, kakor je bilo nazadnje spremenjeno s Skupnim stališčem 2007/871/SZVP (UL L 340, 22.12.2007, str. 109).
on State Aid C 23/06 (ex NN 35/06) which Poland has implemented for steel producer Technologie Buczek Group
o državni pomoči št. C 23/06 (ex NN 35/06) Poljske za proizvajalca jekla skupino Technologie Buczek
(notified under document number C(2007) 5087)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 5087)
Having regard to Protocol No 8 of the Accession Treaty on the restructuring of the Polish steel industry [1] (hereinafter referred to as ‘Protocol No 8’),
ob upoštevanju Protokola št. 8 k Pristopni pogodbi o prestrukturiranju poljske jeklarske industrije [1] (v nadaljevanju „Protokol št. 8“),
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [2],
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi določbami [2],
In March 2002 a restructuring programme was presented by Huta Buczek (hereinafter ‘TB-HB’), to the Polish authorities.
Marca 2002 je družba Huta Buczek (v nadaljevanju „TB-HB“) poljskim organom predstavila program prestrukturiranja.
TB-HB was as of 7 May 2003 renamed Technologie Buczek S.A. (hereinafter ‘TB’).
TB-HB se je 7. maja 2003 preimenoval v Technologie Buczek S.A. (v nadaljevanju „TB“).
On 5 November 2002 the Polish Council of Ministers approved the Restructuring and Development Programme for the Polish Iron and Steel Industry until 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the National Restructuring Programme’ or ‘NRP’).
Poljski Svet ministrov je 5. novembra 2002 odobril Program prestrukturiranja in razvoja poljske železarske in jeklarske industrije do leta 2006 (v nadaljevanju „Nacionalni program prestrukturiranja“ ali „NPP“).
This plan essentially allows for State Aid to be awarded to the Polish steel industry for restructuring in the period from 1997 to 2006 of up to PLN 3387 billion (EUR 846 million) [3].
Ta načrt v bistvu dopušča, da se državna pomoč dodeli poljski jeklarski industriji za prestrukturiranje v obdobju od leta 1997 do 2006 do zneska 3,387 milijarde PLN (846 milijonov EUR) [3].
On this basis the Commission made a proposal for a Council Decision to extend the grace period for the granting of state aid in the Polish steel sector under the Europe Agreement (which initially lasted only until 1997) until Poland’s accession to the EU, subject to the recipients achieving viability by 2006; this was approved by the Council in July 2003 [4].
Na tej podlagi je Komisija pripravila predlog za odločbo Sveta, da se rok odobritve dodelitve državne pomoči v poljskem jeklarskem sektorju v skladu z Evropskim sporazumom (ki je prvotno trajal samo do leta 1997) podaljša do pristopa Poljske k EU, pod pogojem, da prejemniki do leta 2006 dosežejo rentabilnost; to je Svet odobril julija 2003 [4].
The EU thus allowed Poland, notwithstanding its rules [5], to grant restructuring aid to the steel industry.
EU je tako kljub svojim pravilom dovolila Poljski [5], da odobri pomoč za prestrukturiranje jeklarski industriji [6].
This was finally laid down in a Protocol to the Accession Treaty, Protocol No 8 on the restructuring of the Polish steel industry [6].
To je bilo dokončno določeno v Protokolu k Pristopni pogodbi, tj. Protokolu št. 8 o prestrukturiranju poljske jeklarske industrije.
It confirms the acceptance of the award of state aid to eight companies listed in Annex 1 to Protocol No 8, including TB-HB, of not more than PLN 3,387 billion before end-2003.
Ta potrjuje sprejetje dodelitve državne pomoči osmim družbam, navedenim v Prilogi 1 k Protokolu št. 8, vključno s TB-HB, v znesku, ki ne presega 3,387 milijarde PLN, pred koncem leta 2003.
In order to ensure that the conditions laid down in the Protocol are complied with, Protocol No 8 sets out detailed provisions for implementation and monitoring.
Zaradi zagotovitve spoštovanja pogojev, določenih v Protokolu, Protokol št. 8 podrobno opredeljuje določbe za izvajanje in spremljanje.
One requirement is that Poland has to provide bi-annual monitoring reports, and evaluations were carried out by an independent consultant in 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 [7].
Ena od zahtev je, da mora Poljska dvakrat letno pripraviti poročilo o spremljanju, in tako je neodvisni svetovalec opravil ocene v letih 2003, 2004, 2005 in 2006 [7].
Company reports for TB were presented in February 2004 and April 2005.
Poslovni poročili za TB sta bili predloženi februarja 2004 in aprila 2005.
They were discussed with the Polish authorities and the recipients and approved by the Commission and the Polish authorities.
O njiju se je razpravljalo s poljskimi organi in prejemniki, nato pa sta ju Komisija in poljski organi potrdili.
In September 2005 TB modified its IBP (hereinafter referred to as ‘2005 IBP’) and later submitted it to the Commission with a request for approval under point 10 of Protocol No 8.
Septembra 2005 je TB spremenil svoj individualni poslovni načrt (v nadaljevanju „IPN 2005“) in ga pozneje predložil Komisiji z zahtevo po odobritvi na podlagi točke 10 Protokola št. 8.
However, the fact that the company modified this plan several times subsequently and has been in liquidation since 2006 made this request redundant.
Vendar pa je zaradi dejstva, da je družba ta načrt naknadno večkrat spremenila in bila v likvidaciji od leta 2006, ta zahteva postala nepotrebna.
After the independent evaluation in 2005 indicated that TB had an increasing debt to public creditors and was not achieving viability, the Commission requested additional information from Poland by letters of 29 March 2005, 1 August 2005 and 2 December 2005.
Potem ko je neodvisna ocena leta 2005 pokazala, da je imel TB vedno večji dolg do javnih upnikov in ni dosegel rentabilnosti, je Komisija od Poljske zahtevala dodatne informacije z dopisi z dne 29. marca 2005, 1. avgusta 2005 in 2. decembra 2005.
Poland replied by letters of 23 June 2005, 28 September 2005 and 14 February 2006.
Poljska je odgovorila z dopisi z dne 23. junija 2005, 28. septembra 2005 in 14. februarja 2006.
By letter dated 7 June 2006 the Commission informed Poland that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid.
Z dopisom z dne 7. junija 2006 je Komisija obvestila Poljsko, da bo glede pomoči sprožila postopek na podlagi člena 88(2) Pogodbe ES.
The Commission Decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [8].
Odločitev Komisije, da sproži postopek, je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [8].
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the aid/measure.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane stranke, naj predložijo svoje pripombe glede pomoči/ukrepa.
The Commission received no comments from third parties.
Komisija ni od tretjih strank prejela nobenih pripomb.
The Polish authorities replied by letters of 18 September 2006, 2 October 2006 and 20 October 2006.
Poljski organi so odgovorili z dopisi z dne 18. septembra 2006, 2. oktobra 2006 in 20. oktobra 2006.
The Commission asked Poland for additional information by letters of 6 November 2006, 18 December 2006 and 15 March 2007.
Komisija je zaprosila Poljsko za dodatne informacije z dopisi z dne 6. novembra 2006, 18. decembra 2006 in 15. marca 2007.
Poland replied by letters of 24 November 2006, 23 January 2007 and 23 May 2007.
Poljska je odgovorila z dopisi z dne 24. novembra 2006, 23. januarja 2007 in 23. maja 2007.
On 13 December 2006 a meeting took place between the Polish authorities and the Commission.
decembra 2006 so se sestali poljski organi in Komisija.
TB is a Polish tube producer located in the city of Sosnowiec in Silesia Province.
TB je poljski proizvajalec cevi s sedežem v mestu Sosnowiec v provinci Šlezija.
Until 2006 it produced steel tubes in a welded tube rolling shop and a high alloy steel tube rolling shop.
Do leta 2006 je proizvajal jeklene cevi v valjarni za varjene cevi in valjarni za visokolegirane jeklene cevi.
These are considered steel products under the EC State Aid rules [9].
Te po pravilih ES o državni pomoči veljajo za jeklarske proizvode [9].
It has a total capacity of about 60 thousand tonnes [10].
Skupna zmogljivost družbe je približno 60 tisoč ton [10].
The welded tube mill consists of four welding lines (W1.5, W2, which was upgraded in 1993 and 2001, W3, put into service in 1999, and W4, put into service in 2003) and two slitting lines (one put into service in 2004).
Obrat za varjene cevi ima štiri varilne linije (W1.5, W2, ki je bila nadgrajena v letih 1993 in 2001, W3, dana v uporabo leta 1999, in W4, dana v uporabo leta 2003) ter dve rezalni liniji (ena dana v uporabo leta 2004).
TB also operated a rolling mill facility until 2005.
TB je do leta 2005 upravljal tudi valjarno.
TB is a joint stock company which in 2004 had own capital of around PLN 20 million (EUR 5 million).
TB je delniška družba, katere lastni kapital je leta 2004 znašal približno 20 milijonov PLN (5 milijonov EUR).
EF subsequently sold its shares to Stabilo Group Sp. z o.o.
EF je pozneje svoje deleže prodal družbi Stabilo Group Sp. z o.o.
The Treasury was a minority shareholder in GFR.
Zakladnica je bila manjšinski delničar v GFR.
TB currently has four subsidiaries with significant business activity:
TB ima trenutno štiri odvisne družbe s precejšnjo poslovno dejavnostjo:
Buczek Automotive Sp. z o.o (hereinafter ‘BA’, originally named P.U.R.M.
Družba Buczek Automotive Sp. z o.o (v nadaljevanju „BA“, ki se je prvotno imenovala P.U.R.M.
(Przedsiębiorstwo Usług Remontowo Mechanicznych) ‘REMEBUD’ Sp. z o.o.), is today 51 % owned by TB.
(Przedsiębiorstwo Usług Remontowo Mechanicznych) „REMEBUD“ Sp. z o.o.) je danes v 51-odstotni lasti TB.
It originally provided machinery and equipment maintenance services to TB.
Prvotno je skupini TB zagotavljala stroje in zanjo izvajala storitve vzdrževanja opreme.
In December 2005 TB also transferred its main business for the automotive sector to BA (at that time 100 % owned by TB) and renamed it BA.
Decembra 2005 je TB v BA prenesel tudi svojo glavno dejavnost za avtomobilski sektor (ki je bila takrat v 100-odstotni lasti TB) in jo preimenoval v BA.
In addition to the 76 employees in the original company, a further 227 employees were transferred to BA on 1 December 2005.
K 76 zaposlenim v prvotnem podjetju je bilo 1. decembra 2005 v BA premeščenih še 227 zaposlenih.
On 1 January 2006 TB and BA signed a lease agreement, of unlimited duration, on the basis of which BA operates TB's automotive assets.
TB in BA sta 1. januarja 2006 podpisala zakupno pogodbo za nedoločen čas, na podlagi katere BA upravlja sredstva TB v avtomobilskem sektorju.
In November 2006 EF executed the pledge on the shares of BA because of TB’s unpaid debts and acquired a 49 % stake in BA.
Novembra 2006 je EF izterjal zastavo deležev BA zaradi neplačanih dolgov TB in pridobil 49-odstotni delež v BA.
BA is a steel producer within the meaning of the EU State Aid rules.
BA je proizvajalec jekla v smislu pravil EU o državni pomoči.
Huta Buczek Sp. z o.o.
Družba Huta Buczek Sp. z o.o.
(hereinafter ‘HB’, 100 % owned by TB) is TB’s spun-off rolling mill facility.
(v nadaljevanju „HB“, v 100-odstotni lasti TB) je odcepljena valjarna TB.
It has 227 employees.
Ima 227 zaposlenih.
HB was created on 3 December 2004 with PLN 100000 (around EUR 25000) share capital.
HB je bil ustanovljen 3. decembra 2004 z osnovnim kapitalom 100000 PLN (približno 25000 EUR).
In 2005 and the first half of 2006 TB increased the HB’s capital through several capital injections totalling PLN 14811600.
V letu 2005 in prvi polovici 2006 je TB povečal kapital HB z več dokapitalizacijami v skupnem znesku 14811600 PLN.
HB is not a steel producer within the meaning of the EU State Aid rules.
HB ni proizvajalec jekla v smislu pravil EU o državni pomoči.
Buczek — HB — Zakład Produkcji Rur Sp. z o. o. (hereinafter ‘ZPR’, 18 % owned by TB, with the remaining shares held by the company’s employees) which manufactures drawn tubes and provides tube cutting and processing services, with 100 employees.
Družba Buczek – HB – Zakład Produkcji Rur Sp. z o.o. (v nadaljevanju „ZPR“, ki je v 18-odstotni lasti TB, preostali deleži pa so v rokah zaposlenih v podjetju) proizvaja vlečene cevi, zagotavlja storitve rezanja in obdelave cevi ter ima 100 zaposlenih.
It was taken over by TB's employees in 2001 to prevent its closure.
Leta 2001 so družbo prevzeli zaposleni v TB, da bi preprečili njeno zaprtje.
TB still owns TB-ZPR's production equipment, which is leased to it.
TB ima še vedno v lasti proizvodno opremo TB-ZPR, ki mu je bila dana v zakup.
SAMKOL (100 % owned by TB) is a transport service provider, which was founded in 1997 and whose capital was last increased in 2001.
SAMKOL (v 100-odstotni lasti TB) je ponudnik prevoznih storitev, ki je bil ustanovljen leta 1997 in nazadnje dokapitaliziran leta 2001.
It used to provide 80 % of its services to TB but currently only 20 % of its revenue is derived from work for TB.
Prej je 80 % svojih storitev zagotavljal skupini TB, zdaj pa njegove storitve za TB pomenijo samo še 20 % prihodkov družbe.
The original restructuring plan
Prvotni načrt prestrukturiranja
In 2002, TB-HB prepared an individual business plan (hereinafter referred to as ‘2002 IBP’) in order to overcome financial difficulties.
Leta 2002 je TB-HB pripravil individualni poslovni načrt (v nadaljevanju „IPN 2002“), da bi premagal finančne težave.
As indicated in the decision to initiate the procedure, the operational restructuring plan involved focusing on manufacturing of welded calibrated tubes for special applications made of ALU-coated or galvanised steel strip.
Kot je navedeno v odločitvi za sprožitev postopka, je operativni načrt prestrukturiranja vključeval osredotočenje na varjene umerjene cevi za posebne aplikacije, proizvedene iz jeklenega traku, ki je prevlečen z aluminijem ali galvaniziran.
To this end, more production equipment was to be acquired [11].
Zato je bilo treba pridobiti več proizvodne opreme [11].
The business plan indicated the total cost of the potential investments as PLN 25 million.
V poslovnem načrtu je naveden skupni strošek potencialnih naložb v znesku 25 milijonov PLN.
In addition to the main investments in production and processing of pipes for automotive applications and welded tube manufacturing lines, this included projects such as computerisation, modernisation of other minor projects and purchase of fixed assets.
Poleg glavnih naložb v proizvodnjo in obdelavo cevi za avtomobilske aplikacije ter proizvodne linije za varjene cevi so bili vanj vključeni projekti, kot so računalniška podpora, posodobitev drugih manjših projektov in nakup osnovnih sredstev.
Investments in the rolling department were also desired but were judged unrealistic and therefore postponed.
Zaželene so bile tudi naložbe v valjarniški oddelek, vendar so bile ocenjene kot nerealne in so bile zato odložene.
The plan also included a cost reduction programme involving a cut in the number of employees from 532 to 407.
Načrt je vključeval tudi program za znižanje stroškov, vključno z zmanjšanjem števila zaposlenih s 532 na 407.
To this end, provision was made for total costs for 2002-2006 of PLN 2910000.
Zato so skupne stroške za obdobje 2002–2006 določili na 2910000 PLN.
In particular, for the 161 job cuts, external public aid of PLN 823000 with a net grant equivalent of PLN 597000 was envisaged.
Samo za 161 ukinjenih delovnih mest je bila predvidena zunanja javna pomoč v znesku 823000 PLN z neto ekvivalentom dotacije 597000 PLN.
In addition, aid of PLN 2,754 million was envisaged for research and development (hereinafter referred to as ‘R&D’) with PLN 1250000 for 2002, representing a net grant equivalent of PLN 900000 in 2002, and PLN 2540000 for 2003 (net grant equivalent PLN 1854000) [12].
Poleg tega je bila predvidena pomoč v znesku 2,754 milijona PLN za raziskave in razvoj (v nadaljevanju „R in R“) z 1250000 PLN za leto 2002, kar pomeni neto ekvivalent dotacije 900000 PLN v letu 2002, in 540000 PLN za leto 2003 (neto ekvivalent dotacije 1854000 PLN) [12].
Lastly, financial restructuring of PLN 8,411 million net grant equivalent was planned aiming at a debt waiver of about PLN 3,392 million (this mainly involved real estate tax debt to the local authority and smaller amounts owed to the Tax Office and the social insurance institution (Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych, hereinafter referred to as ‘ZUS’) and debt rescheduling of PLN 6,014 million to ZUS and the State Fund for Rehabilitation of Disabled Persons (Państwowy Fundusz Rehabilitacji Osób Niepełnosprawnych, hereinafter ‘PFRON’) with a net grant equivalent of PLN 5,019 million (PLN 5,001 million (ZUS) + 18000 (PFRON).
Načrtovano pa je bilo tudi finančno prestrukturiranje v znesku 8,411 milijona PLN neto ekvivalenta dotacije, namenjeno oprostitvi dolga v znesku 3,392 milijona PLN (to je vključevalo predvsem dolgovani davek na nepremičnine lokalnemu organu ter manjše zneske, dolgovane davčnemu organu in zavodu za socialno zavarovanje (Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych, v nadaljevanju „ZUS“), ter reprogramiranje dolga v znesku 6,014 milijona PLN, dolgovanega ZUS in Državnemu skladu za rehabilitacijo invalidov (Państwowy Fundusz Rehabilitacji Osób Niepełnosprawnych, v nadaljevanju „PFRON“) z neto ekvivalentom dotacije 5,019 milijona PLN (5,001 milijona PLN (ZUS) + 18000 PLN (PFRON).
The purpose of financial restructuring was to purchase materials and to maintain continuity of production [13].
Namen finančnega prestrukturiranja je bil kupiti materiale in ohraniti kontinuiteto proizvodnje [13].
Aid envisaged under the restructuring plan
Predvidena pomoč v načrtu prestrukturiranja
The restructuring programme essentially envisaged the following aid:
Program prestrukturiranja je predvidel predvsem naslednjo pomoč:
Planned State Aid for TB for 2002-2003
Načrtovana državna pomoč za TB za obdobje 2002–2003
Nature of Aid
Narava pomoči
PLN thousand
v 000 PLN
PLN thousand (NGE)
V 000 PLN (NED)
Payment in instalments
Plačilo v obrokih
Sub-total instalments
Vmesni znesek obrokov
Sosnowiec local authority
Lokalni organ v mestu Sosnowiec
Debt write-off
Odpis dolga
Tax Office
Davčni urad
Sub-total write-offs
Vmesni znesek odpisov
R&D
R in R
The restructuring plan also mentioned that in 1997–2001 HB-TB had received State Aid amounting to PLN 4422411 (net grant equivalent).
V načrtu prestrukturiranja je bilo tudi navedeno, da je v obdobju med letoma 1997–2001 HB-TB prejel državno pomoč v znesku 4422411 PLN (neto ekvivalent dotacije).
Most of this was R&D aid (PLN 3243626).
Večina je bila pomoč za R in R (3243626 PLN).
PLN 196800 was aid for environmental protection, PLN 132240 for training aid and the remaining PLN 849746 was aid for the ‘restructuring process’ or ‘ad-hoc aid’ [15].
Pomoč za varstvo okolja je znašala 196800 PLN, pomoč za usposabljanje 132240 PLN, preostalih 849746 PLN pa je bila pomoč za „proces prestrukturiranja“ ali „pomoč ad hoc“ [15].