natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Amount of the advantage enjoyed by the company under Article 39 CA
Znesek ugodnosti, do katerega je upravičeno podjetje na podlagi člena 39 CA
= (1) x share of the advantage passed on by the EIG to the company in accordance with the approval
= (1) × stopnja vračila gospodarskega interesnega združenja podjetju v skladu s soglasjem
Amount of any other regional aid obtained for the same investment
Znesek drugih regionalnih pomoči, pridobljenih za isto vlaganje
Maximum amount of regional aid allowable under ceiling B
Najvišji dovoljeni znesek regionalne pomoči v skladu z zgornjo mejo B
If (5) is a positive figure, the EIG concerned must reimburse: [(1) — (2)] x (5)/(1).
Če je (5) pozitiven, mora zadevno gospodarsko interesno združenje vrniti: [(1) – (2)] × (5)/(1),
and the company must reimburse: (5) * (2)/(1)
podjetje pa mora vrniti: (5) * (2)/(1).
Amounts reimbursed
Vrnjeni zneski
Currency:…
Valuta: …
Moreover, although each aid scheme notified by a Member State will be examined on its own merits, it is considered that the total amount of aid granted under Chapters 3 to 6 should not exceed the total amount of taxes and social contributions collected from shipping activities and seafarers’. In implementing this provision, the French authorities will have to verify that the annual aid received by a given shipowner under the present scheme, together with that granted under all the aid schemes concerned by Chapters 3-6 of the 1997 and 2004 Community guidelines (including the scheme of flat-rate tonnage taxation for maritime transport companies and the exemptions from social security charges and from payment of the maritime part of business tax), does not exceed, for that shipowner, the total amount of taxes and social contributions which ought normally to have been collected from maritime transport activities and from seafarers.
Zato Komisija tudi v primeru, ko se vsak sistem pomoči, ki ga sporoči država članica, pregleda na podlagi njegovih koristi, meni, da skupni znesek pomoči v obliki neposrednih plačil v skladu s točkami 3, 4, 5 in 6 ne sme presegati skupnega zneska davkov in prispevkov za socialno zavarovanje za dejavnosti pomorskega prometa in delavce v pomorstvu.“ Francoski organi morajo za izvajanje te določbe zagotoviti, da letna pomoč, dodeljena upravljavcu na podlagi te sheme, skupaj s pomočjo, dodeljeno na podlagi vseh shem pomoči iz oddelkov 3 do 6 smernic Skupnosti iz leta 1997 in leta 2004, kamor spadajo sistem pavšalnega obračunavanja davkov na tonažo v korist družbam za pomorski promet ter oprostitve socialnih dajatev in plačila dela davka na samozaposlitev, za tega upravljavca ne presega skupnega zneska davkov, dajatev in socialnih prispevkov, ki bi jih bilo treba običajno zaračunati za dejavnosti pomorskega prometa in delavce v pomorskem prometu.
on State aid No C 44/05 (ex NN 79/05, ex N 439/04) partially implemented by Poland for Huta Stalowa Wola S.A.
o državni pomoči C 44/05 (prej NN 79/05, prej N 439/04), ki jo je delno izvedla Poljska za Huta Stalowa Wola S.A.
(notified under document number C(2006) 6730)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 6730)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to those provisions,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi določbami,
By letter of 8 October 2004, Poland informed the Commission of restructuring aid granted to Huta Stalowa Wola S.A. (hereinafter referred to as ‘HSW’ or ‘the recipient’) with a view to obtaining legal certainty that the aid was granted before accession and was, as a result, not applicable after accession and that it did not constitute new aid which could be examined by the Commission under Article 88 of the EC Treaty.
Z dopisom z dne 8. oktobra 2004 je Poljska obvestila Komisijo o pomoči za prestrukturiranje, ki jo je dodelila družbi Huta Stalowa Wola S.A. (v nadaljnjem besedilu „družba HSW“ ali „prejemnica“), da bi pridobila pravno gotovost, da je bila pomoč dodeljena pred pristopom in se po pristopu ne uporablja ter zato ni nova pomoč, ki bi jo Komisija lahko obravnavala v skladu s členom 88 Pogodbe ES.
In the event of the Commission finding that this aid constituted new aid, Poland asked for it to be approved as restructuring aid.
Če bi Komisija ugotovila, da je ta pomoč nova pomoč, je Poljska zaprosila, da se odobri kot pomoč za prestrukturiranje.
The Commission requested Poland to provide further information by letters dated 11 November 2004, 1 March 2005, 27 April 2005 and 26 July 2005, to which Poland replied by letters dated 31 January 2005, registered as received on 2 February, 4 April 2005, registered as received on 8 April, 7 June 2005, registered as received on 9 June, and 2 September 2005, registered as received on 6 September.
Komisija je zaprosila Poljsko, naj posreduje dodatne podatke, z dopisi z dne 11. novembra 2004, 1. marca 2005, 27. aprila 2005 in 26. julija 2005, na katere je Poljska odgovorila z dopisom z dne 31. januarja 2005, evidentiranim 2. februarja, 4. aprila 2005, evidentiranim 8. aprila, 7. junija 2005, evidentiranim 9. junija, in 2. septembra 2005, evidentiranim 6. septembra.
In the course of this exchange of correspondence it emerged that some of the notified aid had been put into effect in contravention of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty.
Med to korespondenco se je pokazalo, da je bilo nekaj priglašene pomoči izvedene v nasprotju s členom 88(3) Pogodbe ES.
The case was therefore classified as unlawful aid and a new case number was attributed (NN 79/2005).
Zato je bil primer opredeljen kot nezakonita pomoč in mu je bila dodeljena nova številka primera (NN 79/2005).
By letter of 23 November 2005, the Commission informed Poland that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 23. novembra 2005 obvestila Poljsko, da se je v zvezi s pomočjo odločila sprožiti postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES.
The Commission's decision to initiate the Article 88(2) procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Odločitev Komisije, da sproži postopek iz člena 88(2), je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the aid.
Komisija je pozvala vse zainteresirane stranke, naj predložijo svoje pripombe.
The Polish authorities submitted their observations by letter of 7 March 2006, registered as received on 9 March.
Poljski organi so predložili svoje pripombe z dopisom z dne 7. marca 2006, evidentiranim 9. marca.
No comments from third parties have been received.
Komisija ni prijela pripomb tretjih strani.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE AID
2 PODROBEN OPIS POMOČI
The company
Družba
HSW, the aid recipient and parent company of the HSW holding company, is based in Stalowa Wola in Podkarpackie province.
Družba HSW, prejemnica pomoči in matična družba holdinga HSW, ima sedež v Stalowi Woli v Podkarpatskem vojvodstvu.
This region is eligible for aid under Article 87(3)(a) of the EC Treaty.
Ta regija je upravičena do pomoči v skladu s členom 87(3)(a) Pogodbe ES.
In February 2006 the holding company comprised eight companies in which HSW held at least 51 % of the shares (which it controlled) and ten in which it held less than 51 %.
Februarja 2006 je holding sestavljalo osem podjetij, v katerih je imela družba HSW vsaj 51-odstotni delež (nad katerim je imela nadzor), in deset podjetij, v katerih je imela manj kot 51-odstotni delež.
The companies which make up the HSW holding company operate as mutual suppliers of goods and services.
Družbe, ki sestavljajo holding HSW, delujejo kot medsebojni dobavitelji blaga in storitev.
Apart from the parent company itself, the companies with the largest stake in the holding company are HSW-Zakład Zespołów Napędowych Sp. z o.o and HSW-Zakład Zespołów Mechanicznych Sp. z o.o.
Poleg matične družbe imata največje deleže v holdingu še HSW-Zakład Zespołów NapędowychSp. z o.o in HSW-Zakład Zespołów Mechanicznych Sp. z o.o.
HSW's share of sales to the companies forming part of the holding company as a percentage of its total sales amounts to 20-30 %.
Delež prodaje družbe HSW družbam, ki sestavljajo holding, znaša 20 do 30 odstotkov njene skupne prodaje.
HSW was set up in 1937 and initially produced guns and stainless steel.
Družba HSW je bila ustanovljena 1937 ter je prvotno izdelovala orožje in nerjavno jeklo.
Unlike its subsidiary HSW–Zakład Metalurgiczny, it is not a steel producer.
V nasprotju s hčerinsko družbo HSW–Zakład Metalurgiczny ne proizvaja jekla.
In 1991 it was converted into a joint stock company.
Leta 1991 je postala delniška družba.
The company manufactures construction equipment and machinery and military equipment (guns, howitzers, etc.).
Družba se ukvarja s proizvodnjo gradbene opreme in strojev ter vojaške opreme (pušk, havbic itd.).
HSW had about 2400 employees in 2005, down from 3173 in 2002.
Leta 2005 je imela družba HSW 2400 zaposlenih, medtem ko jih je bilo leta 2002 3173, tako da se je njihovo število zmanjšalo.
One of the subsidiaries of HSW is the distribution company Dressta Sp. z o.o.
Ena izmed hčerinskih družb HSW je distribucijska družba Dressta Sp. z o.o.
(hereinafter ‘Dressta’).
(v nadaljnjem besedilu „Dresta“).
Difficulties faced by the company
Težave, s katerimi se je spopadala družba
The recipient started to experience difficulties in 2002 following a decline in turnover from PLN 494,9 million (EUR 130,2 million in 2000 to PLN 352,6 million (EUR 92,7 million), i.e. a fall of 29 %.
Prejemnica se je prvič srečala s težavami leta 2002, ko se je njen prihodek zmanjšal s 494,9 milijona PLN (130,2 milijona EUR iz leta 2000 na 352,6 milijona PLN (92,7 milijona EUR), kar je zmanjšanje za 29 %.
Its exports decreased from PLN 505 million (EUR 132,8 million) to PLN 279 million (EUR 73,4 million).
Njen izvoz se je zmanjšal s 505 milijonov PLN (132,8 milijona EUR) na 279 milijonov PLN (73,4 milijona EUR).
The decline in turnover on foreign markets was caused mainly by a business slump and by the fact that Dressta, under the influence of its principal shareholder, which was a major competitor of HSW, had significantly reduced sales of HSW goods on the North American market.
Zmanjšanje prihodka na tujih trgih je bilo predvsem posledica krize poslovanja in dejstva, da je Dressta pod vplivom svojega največjega delničarja, ki je bil največji tekmec družbe HSW, bistveno zmanjšala prodajo blaga družbe HSW na severnoameriškem trgu.
In 2002 the recipient faced operating losses of PLN 44,2 million (EUR 11,6 million) that were due mostly to low utilisation of production capacity.
Leta 2002 so znašale poslovne izgube prejemnice 44,2 milijona PLN (11,6 milijona EUR) in so bile v glavnem posledica nizke stopnje izkoriščenosti proizvodnih zmogljivosti.
Since most of the sales on foreign markets were effected in US dollars and most of the company's costs were expressed in PLN, the appreciation in the zloty adversely affected sales and the recipient's viability.
Ker je bila večina prodaje na tujih trgih izvedena v ameriških dolarjih, večina stroškov podjetja pa izražena v poljskih zlotih, je apreciacija zlota neugodno vplivala na prodajo in sposobnost preživetja prejemnice.
HSW was heavily indebted.
Družba HSW je bila zelo zadolžena.
Its average level of debt in 2000-02 was PLN 169,1 million (EUR 44,5 million).
V obdobju 2000–2002 je povprečna višina njenega dolga znašala 169,1 milijona PLN (44,5 milijona EUR).
Nor were the company's operating activities profitable, i.e. losses on sales increased from PLN 6,4 million (EUR 1,68 million) in 2000 to PLN 33,9 million (EUR 8,60 million) in 2002.
Dobička ni prinašalo niti poslovanje družbe, in sicer so se izgube iz prodaje povečale s 6,4 milijona PLN (1,68 milijona EUR) leta 2000 na 33,9 milijona PLN (8,60 milijona EUR) leta 2002.
The HSW Capital Group recorded net losses of PLN 137,7 million (EUR 36,2 million) in 2002 and PLN 123,9 million (EUR 32,5 million) in 2003.
Leta 2002 je skupina HSW Capital Group zabeležila neto izgube v višini 137,7 milijona PLN (36,2 milijona EUR), leta 2003 pa v višini 123,9 milijona PLN (32,5 milijona EUR).
The restructuring operation
Prestrukturiranje
With a view to addressing these difficulties, the recipient drew up in 2002 a restructuring plan for the period 2003-07.
Prejemnica je leta 2002 izdelala načrt prestrukturiranja za obdobje 2003–2007, da bi odpravila težave.
This plan was amended in February 2006.
Ta načrt je bil februarja 2006 spremenjen.
One of the restructuring plan's principal measures entailed amending the recipient's organisational structure.
Eden glavnih ukrepov iz načrta prestrukturiranja je imel za posledico spremembo organizacijske strukture prejemnice.
The main idea of the restructuring process was to separate the part of HSW directly linked to production from the assets to be restructured.
Glavna zamisel prestrukturiranja je bila ločiti tisti del družbe HSW, ki je neposredno povezan s proizvodnjo, od premoženja, ki naj bi se prestrukturiralo.
Accordingly, an independent company, HSW-Trading Sp. z o.o.
Zato je ministrstvo za finance, večinski delničar družbe HSW, ustanovilo neodvisno družbo HSW-Trading Sp. z o.o.
(‘HSW-Trading’) was set up by HSW's majority shareholder, the Treasury.
(„HSW-Trading“).
HSW-Trading received a capital injection of PLN 40 million (EUR 10,5 million) from the Treasury; the Polish authorities gave notification of this measure within the framework of the aid granted to HSW (see Table 1).
Ministrstvo za finance je za dokapitalizacijo HSW-Tradinga namenilo 40 milijonov PLN (10,5 milijona EUR), poljski organi pa so ta ukrep priglasili v okviru dodeljene pomoči družbi HSW (glej razpredelnico 1).
Whereas HSW-Trading was responsible for the production and sales of industrial machinery, logistics management, quality management and supplies of materials for machine production, HSW retained R & D activities, financing of production assets, strategic marketing, sales of spare parts, repairs, and production and sales of military equipment and was responsible for organisational restructuring.
Medtem ko je bil HSW-Trading odgovoren za proizvodnjo in prodajo industrijskih strojev, logistično upravljanje, vodenje kakovosti in dobavo materiala za proizvodnjo strojev, je družba HSW zadržala razvojne in raziskovalne dejavnosti, financiranje proizvodnih sredstev, strateško trženje, prodajo rezervnih delov, popravila ter proizvodnjo in prodajo vojaške opreme, odgovorna je bila tudi za organizacijsko prestrukturiranje.
In exercising its activities, HSW-Trading leased from HSW assets that were directly related to production.
HSW-Trading je za izvajanje svojih dejavnosti pri HSW najel sredstva, ki so bila neposredno povezana s proizvodnjo.
The necessary workforce was also transferred temporarily to HSW-Trading.
Na HSW-Trading se je začasno prenesla tudi potrebna delovna sila.
The plan states that major employment restructuring should be undertaken.
Načrt je zahteval izvedbo velikega prestrukturiranja zaposlovanja.
HSW plans to employ 2100 workers by the end of the restructuring exercise in 2007, down from 3173 at the end of 2002.
Družba HSW naj bi imela ob koncu prestrukturiranja leta 2007 2100 zaposlenih, kar je zmanjšanje v primerjavi s 3173 zaposlenimi konec leta 2002.
Another area of restructuring was the organisation of a network for distributing building machinery and spare parts on the world market, the aim being to give the recipient access to new markets.
Naslednje področje prestrukturiranja je bila organizacija mreže za distribucijo gradbenih strojev in rezervnih delov na svetovnem trgu, cilj, ki naj bi prejemnici omogočil dostop do novih trgov.
The restructuring of HSW also entailed selling off its subsidiaries and privatising departments providing services.
Prestrukturiranje družbe HSW je imelo za posledico tudi odprodajo njenih hčerinskih družb in privatiziranje oddelkov za opravljanje storitev.
By 2006 HSW had sold HSW–Zakład Kuźnia Matrycowa Sp. z o.o for PLN […] million (EUR […] million).
Do leta 2006 je družba HSW prodala HSW–Zakład Kuźnia Matrycowa Sp. z o.o za […] milijonov PLN ([…] milijonov EUR).
A private investor was found for two HSW-Zaklad Metalurgiczny subsidiaries (HSW-Walcownia Blach Sp. z o.o. and HSW-Huta Stali Jakosciowych).
Našel se je zasebni vlagatelj za dve hčerinski družbi HSW-Zakład Metalurgiczny (HSW-Walcownia Blach Sp. z o.o. in HSW-Huta Stali Jakosciowych).
In total, HSW generated receipts privatisation of PLN 112,2 million (EUR 29,5 million).
Družba HSW je s privatizacijo ustvarila skupne prihodke v višini 112,2 milijona PLN (29,5 milijona EUR).
The sale of two subsidiaries, HSW–Zakład Spreżynownia and HSW–Tlenownia, was to be finalised by 2006.
Prodaja obeh hčerinskih družb HSW–Zakład Sprezynownia in HSW–Tlenownia naj bi bila zaključena do leta 2006.
Asset restructuring entails reducing annual production capacity from 1500 to 1200 items of construction machinery.
Prestrukturiranje sredstev je imelo za posledico zmanjšanje letne proizvodnje zmogljivosti s 1500 na 1200 kosov gradbenih strojev.
The size of HSW's assets was deemed clearly excessive in relation to its needs.
Veljalo je, da so sredstva družbe HSW očitno prevelika glede na njene potrebe.
Since HSW planned to focus mainly on producing construction machinery, a significant number of its assets had to be sold.
Ker je družba HSW načrtovala usmeritev predvsem v proizvodnjo gradbenih strojev, je bilo treba prodati precej njenih sredstev.
The actual sale of assets from January 2003 to December 2005 generated revenue of PLN 52,1 million (EUR 13,7 million), which by far exceeded the planned sale, estimated at PLN 10,3 million (EUR 2,7 million).
Z dejansko prodajo sredstev od januarja 2003 do decembra 2005 je bil ustvarjen prihodek v višini 52,1 milijona PLN (13,7 milijona EUR), ki je precej presegal načrtovano prodajo, ocenjeno na 10,3 milijona PLN (2,7 milijona EUR).
The following assets were sold: some 248,4 hectares of land (including about 153 hectares of woodland); real estate with a usable surface area of about 76000 m2 and 94 items of machinery and equipment.
Prodana so bila naslednja sredstva: približno 248,4 hektarja zemljišč (vključno s približno 153 hektarji gozda), nepremičnina s približno 76000 m2 uporabne površine in 94 kosov strojev in opreme.
Overall restructuring costs, including costs incurred prior to accession, amount to PLN 450,3 million (EUR 118,5 million) and consist of the items indicated in Table 1.
Skupni stroški prestrukturiranja, vključno s stroški, nastalimi pred pristopom, znašajo 450,3 milijona PLN (118,5 milijona EUR) in jih sestavljajo postavke iz razpredelnice 1.
Table 1:
Razpredelnica 1:
Restructuring costs (PLN ‘000)
Stroški prestrukturiranja (v tisočih PLN)
Restructuring measure
Ukrep za prestrukturiranje
Restructuring of civil-law liabilities
Prestrukturiranje civilnopravnih odgovornosti
Restructuring of public-law liabilities
Prestrukturiranje javnopravnih obveznosti
Organisation of supply and distribution system
Organizacija sistema oskrbe in distribucije
Continuity of supply of materials, spare parts and components
Stalna oskrba z materialom ter rezervnimi in sestavnimi deli
Product restructuring
Prestrukturiranje izdelkov
Asset restructuring
Prestrukturiranje sredstev
Employment restructuring
Prestrukturiranje zaposlovanja
Organisational restructuring
Organizacijsko prestrukturiranje
Modernisation of production potential
Posodobitev proizvodnih zmogljivosti
The granting authorities are the Treasury, the Ministry of Science and Information Technology, tax offices, local authorities, the Social Insurance Fund (ZUS), the State Fund for the Rehabilitation of the Disabled (PFRON), town halls and the Industrial Development Agency.
Organi, ki so dodelili pomoč, so ministrstvo za finance, ministrstvo za znanost in informacijsko tehnologijo, davčni uradi, lokalni organi, Sklad socialnega zavarovanja, Državni sklad za rehabilitacijo invalidov (PFRON), mestne hiše in Agencija za industrijski razvoj.
Poland has maintained that part of the aid granted to HSW was linked to the need to protect essential national security interests.
Poljska je trdila, da je bil del pomoči, dodeljene družbi HSW, povezan s potrebo zavarovati bistvene interese nacionalne varnosti.
The aid amounted to some PLN 19 million (EUR 5 million) and was granted both before and after Poland acceded to the European Union.
Pomoč je znašala približno 19 milijonov PLN (5 milijonov EUR) in je bila dodeljena pred pristopom Poljske k Evropski uniji in po njem.
The Polish authorities maintain, with reference to Article 296 of the EC Treaty, that the provisions of that Treaty do not preclude Member States from granting aid deemed necessary to protect essential national security interests.
Poljski organi ob sklicevanju na člen 296 Pogodbe ES trdijo, da določbe iz te pogodbe ne preprečujejo, da se državam članicam dodeli pomoč, za katero se meni, da je potrebna za zavarovanje bistvenih interesov nacionalne varnosti.
The most significant aid measures granted before accession to the non-military part of HSW were two loans from the Industrial Development Agency of PLN 75 million (EUR 19,7 million).
Najpomembnejša ukrepa pomoči, ki sta bila odobrena nevojaškemu delu družbe HSW pred pristopom, sta bili dve posojili Agencije za industrijski razvoj v višini 75 milijonov PLN (19,7 milijona EUR).
Another important aid measure was a capital injection by the Treasury of PLN 40 million (EUR 10,5 million) for the subsidiary HSW–Trading Sp. z o.o.
Naslednji pomemben ukrep pomoči je bila dokapitalizacija hčerinske družbe HSW–Trading Sp. z o.o., ki jo je financiralo ministrstvo za finance v višini 40 milijonov PLN (10,5 milijona EUR).
An amount of PLN 27,9 million (EUR 7,3 million) in the form of debt write-offs was granted on the basis of the amended State Aid to Enterprises of Special Significance to the Labour Market Act of 30 October 2002 (see Table 4 below).
Znesek v višini 27,9 milijona PLN (7,3 milijona EUR) je bil v obliki odpisa dolga dodeljen na podlagi spremenjenega Zakona o državni pomoči za podjetja, ki so posebnega pomena za trg dela, z dne 30. oktobra 2002 (glej razpredelnico 4 spodaj).
Restructuring under the Act was supervised by the President of the Industrial Development Agency and was based on a so-called restructuring decision within the meaning of Articles 10(1)(4) and (19) of the Act (‘restructuring decision’).
Prestrukturiranje v skladu s tem zakonom je nadzoroval predsednik Agencije za industrijski razvoj in je temeljilo na tako imenovani odločbi o prestrukturiranju iz členov 10(1)(4) in (19) zakona („odločba o prestrukturiranju“).
The restructuring decision approving the restructuring plan and allowing the restructuring of public-law liabilities was issued on 29 April 2005 and amended on 17 June 2005.
Odločba o prestrukturiranju, ki je odobrila načrt za prestrukturiranje in omogočila prestrukturiranje javnopravnih obveznosti, je bila izdana 29. aprila 2005 in spremenjena 17. junija 2005.
The different measures as originally notified to the Commission are presented in the following table:
V naslednji razpredelnici so predstavljeni različni ukrepi, kot so bili prvotno priglašeni Komisiji:
Table 2:
Razpredelnica 2:
Planned and granted aid (PLN ‘000), as notified
Predvidena in dodeljena pomoč (v tisočih PLN), kot je bila priglašena
Category of aid
Kategorija pomoči
Nominal amount
Nominalni znesek
Restructuring aid granted before 30 April 2004
Pomoč za prestrukturiranje, dodeljena pred 30. aprilom 2004
Restructuring aid granted on the basis of the amended State Aid to Enterprises of Special Significance to the Labour Market Act of 30 October 2002
Pomoč za prestrukturiranje, dodeljena na podlagi spremenjenega Zakona o državni pomoči za podjetja, ki so posebnega pomena za trg dela, z dne 30. oktobra 2002
Restructuring aid to be awarded after 30 April 2004
Pomoč za prestrukturiranje, ki naj bi se dodelila po 30. aprilu 2004
DECISION TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS UNDER ARTICLE 88(2) OF THE EC TREATY
3 ODLOČITEV O SPROŽITVI POSTOPKA NA PODLAGI ČLENA 88(2) POGODBE ES
The Commission decided to initiate the formal investigation procedure for two reasons.
Komisija se je odločila za sprožitev formalnega postopka preiskave iz dveh razlogov.