natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The entry ‘Faiz, Maulavi (Information Dept, Ministry of Foreign Affairs).’ under the heading ‘Natural persons’ shall be replaced by:
Vnos „Faiz, Maulavi (oddelek za informiranje, Ministrstvo za zunanje zadeve)“ pod naslovom „Fizične osebe“ se zamenja z naslednjim:
Function: Head of the Information Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Taliban regime.
Funkcija: Vodja oddelka za informacije, Ministrstvo za zunanje zadeve talibanskega režima.
Date of birth: Approximately 1969.
Datum rojstva: približno leta 1969.
Place of birth: Ghazni province, Afghanistan.
Kraj rojstva: provinca Ghazni, Afganistan.
The entry ‘Hanif, Qari Din Mohammad (Minister of Planning).’ under the heading ‘Natual persons’ shall be replaced by:
Vnos „Hanif, Qari Din Mohammad (minister za načrtovanje).“ pod naslovom „Fizične osebe“ se nadomesti z:
Title: Qari.
Naziv: Qari.
Function: (a) Minister of Planning of the Taliban regime, (b) Minister of Higher Education of the Taliban regime.
Funkcija: (a) minister za načrtovanje talibanskega režima, (b) minister visokega šolstva talibanskega režima.
Date of birth: Approximately 1955.
Datum rojstva: približno leta 1955.
Place of birth: Badakhshan province, Afghanistan.
Kraj rojstva: provinca Badakhshan, Afganistan.
The entry ‘Hottak, Abdul Rahman Ahmad, Maulavi (Deputy (Cultural) Minister of Information and Culture)’ under the heading ‘Natural persons’ shall be replaced by:
Vnos „Hottak, Abdul Rahman Ahmad, Maulavi (namestnik ministra za informiranje in kulturo, zadolžen za kulturo)“ pod naslovom „Fizične osebe“ se zamenja z naslednjim:
Function: Deputy (Cultural) Minister of Information and Culture of the Taliban regime.
Funkcija: namestnik ministra za informiranje in kulturo, zadolžen za kulturo talibanskega režima.
Date of birth: Approximately 1957.
Datum rojstva: približno leta 1957.
The entry ‘Jalal, Noor, Maulavi (Deputy (Administrative) Minister of Interior Affairs).’ under the heading ‘Natural persons’ shall be replaced by:
Vnos „Jalal, Noor, Maulavi (namestnik ministra za notranje zadeve, zadolžen za upravne zadeve)“ pod naslovom „Fizične osebe“ se zamenja z naslednjim:
Function: Deputy (Administrative) Minister of Interior Affairs of the Taliban regime.
Funkcija: namestnik ministra za notranje zadeve, zadolžen za upravne zadeve talibanskega režima.
Date of birth: Approximately 1960.
Datum rojstva: približno leta 1960.
Place of birth: Kunar province, Afghanistan.
Kraj rojstva: provinca Kunar, Afganistan.
The entry ‘Motasem, Abdul Wasay Aghajan, Mullah (Minister of Finance).’ under the heading ‘Natural persons’ shall be replaced by:
Vnos „Motasem, Abdul Wasay Aghajan, Mullah (minister za finance)“ pod naslovom „Fizične osebe“ se zamenja z naslednjim:
Function: Minister of Finance of the Taliban regime.
Funkcija: minister za finance talibanskega režima.
Place of birth: Kandahar city, Afghanistan.
Kraj rojstva: Kandahar, Afganistan.
The entry ‘Naim, Mohammad, Mullah (Deputy Minister of Civil Aviation)’ under the heading ‘Natural persons’ shall be replaced by:
Vnos „Naim, Mohammad, Mullah (namestnik ministra za civilno letalstvo)“ pod naslovom „Fizične osebe“ se nadomesti z:
Function: Deputy Minister of Civil Aviation of the Taliban regime.
Funkcija: namestnik ministra za civilno letalstvo.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 860/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 860/2007
These prices and duties have been last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 710/2007 [4].
Navedene cene in dolžnosti so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 710/2007 [4].
OJ L 163, 23.6.2007, p. 3.
UL L 163, 23.6.2007, str. 3.
Amended representative prices and additional duties applicable to imports of white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 17029099 applicable from 21 July 2007
Spremenjeni zneski reprezentativnih cen in dodatnih uvoznih dajatev za beli sladkor, surovi sladkor in proizvode pod oznako KN 17029099, ki se uporabljajo od 21. julija 2007
Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (ES) št. 861/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
establishing a European Small Claims Procedure
o uvedbi evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 61(c) and Article 67 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti členov 61(c) in 67 Pogodbe,
The Community has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice in which the free movement of persons is ensured.
Skupnost si je zastavila cilj ohranjanja in razvijanja območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, v katerem je zagotovljen prost pretok oseb.
For the gradual establishment of such an area, the Community is to adopt, inter alia, measures in the field of judicial cooperation in civil matters having cross-border implications and needed for the proper functioning of the internal market.
Za postopno vzpostavitev takšnega območja mora Skupnost med drugim na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih zadevah s čezmejnimi posledicami sprejeti ukrepe, ki so potrebni za pravilno delovanje notranjega trga.
According to Article 65(c) of the Treaty, those measures are to include those eliminating obstacles to the good functioning of civil proceedings, if necessary by promoting the compatibility of the rules on civil procedure applicable in the Member States.
V skladu s členom 65(c) Pogodbe ti ukrepi vključujejo odpravljanje ovir za nemoten potek civilnih postopkov, po potrebi s spodbujanjem združljivosti predpisov o civilnih postopkih, ki se uporabljajo v državah članicah.
In this respect, the Community has, among other measures, already adopted Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 of 29 May 2000 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters [3], Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters [4], Council Decision 2001/470/EC of 28 May 2001 establishing a European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters [5], Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims [6] and Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure [7].
V zvezi s tem je Skupnost med drugimi ukrepi že sprejela Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1348/2000 z dne 29. maja 2000 o vročanju sodnih in zunajsodnih pisanj v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah v državah članicah [3], Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah [4], Odločbo Sveta 2001/470/ES z dne 28. maja 2001 o ustanovitvi Evropske pravosodne mreže v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah [5], Uredbo (ES) št. 805/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o uvedbi evropskega naloga za izvršbo nespornih zahtevkov [6] in Uredbo (ES) št. 1896/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o uvedbi postopka za evropski plačilni nalog [7].
The European Council meeting in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999 invited the Council and the Commission to establish common procedural rules for simplified and accelerated cross-border litigation on small consumer and commercial claims.
Na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Tampereju 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 sta bila Svet in Komisija pozvana, da določita skupna procesna pravila za poenostavitev in pospešitev sodnih postopkov v čezmejnih potrošniških in gospodarskih sporih majhne vrednosti.
On 30 November 2000, the Council adopted a joint programme of the Commission and the Council of measures for the implementation of the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in civil and commercial matters [8].
Svet je 30. novembra 2000 sprejel skupni program Komisije in Sveta o ukrepih za izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah [8].
The programme refers to simplifying and speeding up the settlement of cross-border litigation on small claims.
Program se nanaša na pospešeno reševanje in poenostavitev sodnih postopkov o čezmejnih sporih majhne vrednosti.
This was taken forward by the Hague Programme [9], adopted by the European Council on 5 November 2004, which called for work on small claims to be actively pursued.
To je bilo upoštevano v Haaškem programu [9], ki ga je Evropski svet sprejel 5. novembra 2004 in v katerem se poziva k aktivnemu nadaljevanju dela v zvezi s spori majhne vrednosti.
On 20 December 2002, the Commission adopted a Green Paper on a European order for payment procedure and on measures to simplify and speed up small claims litigation.
Komisija je 20. decembra 2002 sprejela Zeleno knjigo o postopku za evropski plačilni nalog ter ukrepih za poenostavitev in pospešitev sodnih postopkov v sporih majhne vrednosti.
The Green Paper launched a consultation on measures concerning the simplification and the speeding up of small claims litigation.
Z Zeleno knjigo se je začelo posvetovanje o ukrepih glede poenostavitve in pospešitve sodnih postopkov v sporih majhne vrednosti.
Many Member States have introduced simplified civil procedures for small claims since costs, delays and complexities connected with litigation do not necessarily decrease proportionally with the value of the claim.
Mnoge države članice so uvedle poenostavljene civilne postopke za spore majhne vrednosti, saj ni nujno, da se stroški, zamude in zapletenost, povezani s sodnim postopkom, zmanjšajo sorazmerno z vrednostjo zahtevka.
The obstacles to obtaining a fast and inexpensive judgment are exacerbated in cross-border cases.
Ovire za hitro in ne predrago sojenje so večje v čezmejnih zadevah.
It is therefore necessary to establish a European procedure for small claims (European Small Claims Procedure).
Zato je nujno uvesti evropski postopek v sporih majhne vrednosti.
The objective of such a procedure should be to facilitate access to justice.
Cilj takšnega evropskega postopka bi morala biti poenostavitev dostopa do pravnega varstva.
The distortion of competition within the internal market due to imbalances with regard to the functioning of the procedural means afforded to creditors in different Member States entails the need for Community legislation that guarantees a level playing-field for creditors and debtors throughout the European Union.
Izkrivljanje konkurence na notranjem trgu zaradi neravnovesja glede delovanja procesnih sredstev, ki so na voljo upnikom v različnih državah članicah, povzroča potrebo po zakonodaji Skupnosti, ki zagotavlja enake pogoje za dolžnike in upnike v vsej Evropski uniji.
It should be necessary to have regard to the principles of simplicity, speed and proportionality when setting the costs of dealing with a claim under the European Small Claims Procedure.
Pri določanju stroškov za obravnavanje zahtevka v okviru evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti bi bilo treba nujno upoštevati načela enostavnosti, hitrosti in sorazmernosti.
It is appropriate that details of the costs to be charged be made public, and that the means of setting any such costs be transparent.
Primerno bi bilo, da se podrobnosti zaračunanih stroškov objavijo in da so načini določitve vseh takšnih stroškov pregledni.
The European Small Claims Procedure should simplify and speed up litigation concerning small claims in cross-border cases, whilst reducing costs, by offering an optional tool in addition to the possibilities existing under the laws of the Member States, which will remain unaffected.
Z evropskim postopkom v sporih majhne vrednosti bi se morali poenostaviti in pospešiti sodni postopki v čezmejnih sporih majhne vrednosti ter znižati njihovi stroški in tako zagotoviti alternativo možnostim, ki obstajajo v skladu z zakoni držav članic, ki bodo ostale nespremenjene.
This Regulation should also make it simpler to obtain the recognition and enforcement of a judgment given in the European Small Claims Procedure in another Member State.
Ta uredba bi morala prav tako omogočiti lažje priznavanje in izvrševanje sodb, izdanih v okviru evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti v drugi državi članici.
This Regulation seeks to promote fundamental rights and takes into account, in particular, the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Ta uredba si prizadeva spodbujati temeljne pravice in zlasti upošteva načela, priznana z Listino o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije.
The court or tribunal should respect the right to a fair trial and the principle of an adversarial process, in particular when deciding on the necessity of an oral hearing and on the means of taking evidence and the extent to which evidence is to be taken.
Sodišča bi morala spoštovati pravico do poštenega sojenja in načelo kontradiktornosti postopka, še zlasti pri odločanju o nujnosti glavne obravnave in izvajanja dokazov ter obsegu izvajanja dokazov.
For the purposes of facilitating calculation of the value of a claim, all interest, expenses and disbursements should be disregarded.
Zaradi poenostavitve izračuna vrednosti zahtevka bi bilo treba zanemariti vse obresti na znesek glavnice, stroške in izdatke.
This should affect neither the power of the court or tribunal to award these in its judgment nor the national rules on the calculation of interest.
To ne bi smelo vplivati na pristojnost sodišč, da se jih določi s sodbo in na nacionalne predpise o izračunu obresti.
In order to facilitate the commencement of the European Small Claims Procedure, the claimant should make an application by filling in a standard claim form and lodging it with the court or tribunal.
Da bi olajšali začetek evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti, bi morala tožeča stranka predložiti vlogo tako, da izpolni standardni obrazec zahtevka in ga vloži na sodišču.
The claim form should be submitted only to a court or tribunal that has jurisdiction.
Obrazec zahtevka bi bilo treba vložiti le na pristojnem sodišču.
The claim form should be accompanied, where appropriate, by any relevant supporting documents.
Obrazcu zahtevka bi morale biti po potrebi priložene ustrezne dokazne listine.
However, this does not prevent the claimant from submitting, where appropriate, further evidence during the procedure.
Vendar lahko tožeča stranka, kadar je ustrezno, predloži tudi nadaljnje dokaze med postopkom.
The same principle should apply to the response by the defendant.
Enako načelo bi moralo veljati tudi za odgovor tožene stranke.
The concepts of ‘clearly unfounded’ in the context of the dismissal of a claim and of ‘inadmissible’ in the context of the dismissal of an application should be determined in accordance with national law.
Pojma „očitno neutemeljen“ glede zavrnitve zahtevka in „nedopusten“ glede zavrženja vloge bi bilo treba določiti v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo.
The European Small Claims Procedure should be a written procedure, unless an oral hearing is considered necessary by the court or tribunal or a party so requests.
Evropski postopek v sporih majhne vrednosti bi moral potekati pisno, razen če sodišče meni, da je potrebna glavna obravnava, ali če to zahteva stranka.
The court or tribunal may refuse such a request.
Sodišče lahko takšno zahtevo zavrne.
Such refusal may not be contested separately.
Te zavrnitve ni možno spodbijati ločeno.
The parties should not be obliged to be represented by a lawyer or another legal professional.
Zastopanje strank po odvetniku ali drugem pravnem strokovnjaku ne bi smelo biti obvezno.
The concept of ‘counterclaim’ should be interpreted within the meaning of Article 6(3) of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 as arising from the same contract or facts on which the original claim was based.
Pojem „nasprotne tožbe“ bi bilo treba razumeti v smislu člena 6(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 44/2001 kot nasprotno tožbo, ki izhaja iz iste pogodbe ali dejstva, na katerem je temeljila prvotna tožba.
Articles 2 and 4 as well as Article 5(3), (4) and (5) should apply, mutatis mutandis, to counterclaims.
Členi 2, 4, 5(3), (4) in (5) bi se morali smiselno uporabljati za nasprotne tožbe.
In cases where the defendant invokes a right of set-off during the proceedings, such claim should not constitute a counterclaim for the purposes of this Regulation.
V primerih, ko tožena stranka med postopkom uveljavlja pravico do pobota, ta zahteva ne bi smela predstavljati nasprotne tožbe v smislu te uredbe.
Therefore, the defendant should not be obliged to use standard Form A, as set out in Annex I, for invoking such a right.
Zato tožena stranka ne bi smela biti obvezana uporabljati standardnega obrazca A iz Priloge I za uveljavljanje take pravice.
The Member State addressed for the purposes of the application of Article 6 is the Member State where service is to be effected or to where the document is to be dispatched.
Država članica naslovnica za namene uporabe člena 6 je država članica, v kateri se vročitev izvede ali v katero se dokument pošlje.
In order to reduce costs and delays, documents should be served on the parties primarily by postal service attested by an acknowledgment of receipt, including the date of receipt.
Da bi znižali stroške in zmanjšali zamude, bi bilo treba listine strankam vročiti zlasti po pošti s potrdilom o prejemu, iz katerega je razviden datum prejema.
A party may refuse to accept a document at the time of service or by returning the document within one week if it is not written in, or accompanied by a translation into, the official language of the Member State addressed (or, if there are several official languages in that Member State, the official language or one of the official languages of the place where service is to be effected or to where the document is to be dispatched) or a language which the addressee understands.
Stranka lahko zavrne prejem dokumenta v času vročitve, ali tako, da ga vrne v enem tednu, če ni sestavljen ali preveden v uradni jezik države članice naslovnice (ali, če je v državi članici več uradnih jezikov, v uradni jezik ali v enega izmed uradnih jezikov kraja, kjer naj se opravi vročitev ali kamor se dokument pošilja), ali pa v jezik, ki ga naslovnik razume.
In the context of oral hearings and the taking of evidence, the Member States should encourage the use of modern communication technology subject to the national law of the Member State where the court or tribunal is situated.
V okviru glavnih obravnav in izvajanja dokazov bi morale države članice spodbujati rabo moderne komunikacijske tehnologije v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo države članice, v kateri je sodišče.
The court or tribunal should use the simplest and least costly method of taking evidence.
Sodišče bi moralo uporabiti najpreprostejši in najcenejši način izvajanja dokazov.
The practical assistance to be made available to the parties should include technical information concerning the availability and the filling in of the forms.
Praktična pomoč, ki bi morala biti na voljo strankam, bi morala vključevati tehnične informacije v zvezi z razpoložljivostjo in izpolnjevanjem obrazcev.
The information about procedural questions can also be given by the court or tribunal staff in accordance with national law.
Informacije o postopkovnih vprašanjih lahko v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo daje tudi sodno osebje.
As the objective of this Regulation is to simplify and speed up litigation concerning small claims in cross-border cases, the court or tribunal should act as soon as possible even when this Regulation does not prescribe any time limit for a specific phase of the procedure.
Ker je cilj te uredbe poenostaviti in pospešiti sodne postopke v čezmejnih sporih majhne vrednosti, bi moralo sodišče ukrepati čim prej tudi, ko ta uredba za določeno fazo postopka ne predpisuje roka.
For the purposes of calculating time limits as provided for in this Regulation, Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71 of the Council of 3 June 1971 determining the rules applicable to periods, dates and time limits [10] should apply.
Za računanje rokov, predvidenih v tej uredbi, bi bilo treba uporabljati Uredbo Sveta (EGS, Euratom) št. 1182/71 z dne 3. junija 1971 o določitvi pravil glede rokov, datumov in iztekov rokov [10].
In order to speed up the recovery of small claims, the judgment should be enforceable notwithstanding any possible appeal and without the condition of the provision of a security except as provided for in this Regulation.
Da bi pospešili izterjavo v sporih majhne vrednosti, bi morala biti sodba izvršljiva ne glede na možno pravno sredstvo in brez pogoja pologa varščine, razen če ni s to uredbo določeno drugače.
Any reference in this Regulation to an appeal should include any possible means of appeal available under national law.
Vsako sklicevanje na pravno sredstvo v tej uredbi bi moralo vključevati vsa možna pravna sredstva, ki so na voljo po nacionalni zakonodaji.
The court or tribunal must include a person qualified to serve as a judge in accordance with national law.
Sodišče mora vključevati osebo, ki je v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo usposobljena za poklic sodnika.
Whenever the court or tribunal is required to set a time limit, the party concerned should be informed of the consequences of not complying with it.
Kadar koli mora sodišče določiti rok, bi se moralo zadevno stranko obvestiti, kakšne so lahko posledice, če tega roka ne upošteva.
The unsuccessful party should bear the costs of the proceedings.
Stroške postopka bi morala nositi stranka, ki v pravdi ni uspela.
The costs of the proceedings should be determined in accordance with national law.
Stroški postopka bi morali biti določeni v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo.
Having regard to the objectives of simplicity and cost-effectiveness, the court or tribunal should order that an unsuccessful party be obliged to pay only the costs of the proceedings, including for example any costs resulting from the fact that the other party was represented by a lawyer or another legal professional, or any costs arising from the service or translation of documents, which are proportionate to the value of the claim or which were necessarily incurred.
Sodišče bi moralo ob upoštevanju ciljev enostavnosti in stroškovne učinkovitosti odrediti, da mora stranka, ki v postopku ne uspe, plačati le stroške postopka, vključno tudi z na primer vsemi stroški, nastalimi zato, ker je drugo stranko zastopal odvetnik ali drug pravni strokovnjak, ali vse stroške, nastale zaradi vročitve ali prevoda dokumentov, ki ustrezajo vrednosti zahtevka, ali so neizogibni.
In order to facilitate recognition and enforcement, a judgment given in a Member State in the European Small Claims Procedure should be recognised and enforceable in another Member State without the need for a declaration of enforceability and without any possibility of opposing its recognition.
Da bi olajšali priznavanje in izvrševanje, bi morala biti sodba, izdana v državi članici v okviru evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti, priznana in izvršljiva v drugi državi članici brez potrebe po potrdilu o izvršljivosti in brez vsakršne možnosti nasprotovanja njenemu priznanju.
There should be minimum standards for the review of a judgment in situations where the defendant was not able to contest the claim.
Treba bi bilo predvideti minimalne standarde za preskus sodbe v primerih, ko tožena stranka ni mogla spodbijati zahtevka.
Having regard to the objectives of simplicity and cost-effectiveness, the party seeking enforcement shall not be required to have an authorised representative or a postal address in the Member State of enforcement, other than with agents having competence for the enforcement procedure in accordance with the national law of that Member State.
Ob upoštevanju ciljev enostavnosti in stroškovne učinkovitosti se od stranke, ki zahteva izvršitev, razen v primeru uradnikov, pristojnih za izvršilni postopek v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo zadevne države članice, ne bi smelo zahtevati, da ima pooblaščenca ali poštni naslov v državi članici izvršbe.