natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In 1996, AGB ceased to comply with the terms of the consolidation programme and engaged in high risk operations and faced liquidity problems and the deterioration of its assets.
Leta 1996 je AGB prenehala ravnati v skladu s pogoji iz programa konsolidacije in se začela ukvarjati z zelo tveganimi posli, s čimer si je nakopala likvidnostne težave in si poslabšala premoženjsko stanje.
The liquidity crisis and the shareholders’ unwillingness to take appropriate remedial actions led to the imposition of a forced administration on AGB on 17 September 1996.
Zaradi likvidnostne krize in nepripravljenosti delničarjev, da sprejmejo ustrezne sanacijske ukrepe, je bila 17. septembra 1996 v AGB uvedena izredna uprava.
Concerning AGB’s financial situation, the audit carried out after the imposition of the forced administration (balance sheet date 16 September 1996) revealed a loss of CZK –8487 million and an equity balance of CZK –5476 million.
Revizija, ki je bila opravljena po uvedbi izredne uprave (bilanca z dne 16. septembra 1996), je v zvezi s finančnim stanjem AGB ugotovila, da znaša izguba 8487 milijonov CZK, lastniški kapital pa je bil negativen za –5476 milijonov CZK.
The regular annual audit with the balance sheet date 31 December 1996 would have recorded a loss of CZK –10097 million and an equity balance of CZK –6328 million.
Redna letna revizija z bilanco stanja dne 31. decembra 1996 je ugotovila izgubo v znesku –10097 milijonov CZK in lastniški kapital v znesku –6328 milijonov CZK.
In order to avoid negative consequences for the whole Czech banking sector, the Czech Republic started to implement measures with the aim of ensuring the rescue and restructuring of AGB.
Da bi Češka republika preprečila neugodne posledice za celoten češki bančni sektor, je začela izvajati ukrepe, katerih cilj je bil rešiti in prestrukturirati AGB.
However, since the above mentioned audits of AGB that were carried out after the imposition of forced administration revealed losses in excess of the bank’s capital it was considered the best way to ensure AGB’s long term viability by creating a separate organisational unit, AGB1, for AGB’s core banking activities.
Ker sta prej navedeni reviziji, ki sta bili v AGB opravljeni po uvedbi izredne uprave, ugotovili izgubo, ki je presegala kapital banke, je obveljalo mnenje, da je najbolje zagotoviti dolgoročno rentabilnost AGB z ustanovitvijo samostojne organizacijske enote AGB1, ki bo prevzela osnovno bančno dejavnost AGB.
consisted mainly of classified loans, loans extended to AGB’s selected subsidiaries or other affiliated entities, a selected asset portfolio, all of the immovable assets and some of the movable assets.
so sestavljali predvsem razvrščena posojila, posojila, dana izbranim podružnicam AGB ali drugim povezanim podružnicam, izbrani portfelj sredstev, vse nepremičnine in nekatere premičnine.
was then to be sold to a strategic investor via an open, unconditional and transparent tender procedure.
je bila nato prodana strateškemu vlagatelju na podlagi odprtega, brezpogojnega in preglednega postopka javnega razpisa.
The tender
Javni razpis
The Forced Administrator announced a public tender for the sale of AGB1 in April 1997.
Izredna uprava je aprila 1997 objavila javni razpis za prodajo AGB1.
In the subsequent tender procedure, GE Capital Corporation remained as the sole party interested in the purchase of AGB1.
V postopku javnega razpisa, ki je sledil, se je na koncu za nakup AGB1 zanimala edino korporacija GE Capital Corporation.
was then sold to GECB on 22 June 1998 for about CZK 304 million, subject to the guarantees and warranties and a put option.
je bila nato 22. junija 1998 prodana banki GECB za približno 304 milijone CZK, ob upoštevanju jamstev in garancij ter prodajne opcije.
The guarantees and warranties are described in more detail in recitals 19 to 26 and the put option in recitals 27 to 32.
Jamstva in garancije so podrobneje opisani v uvodnih izjavah od 19 do 26, prodajna opcija pa v uvodnih izjavah od 27 do 32.
One measure that need not be considered further is the Depositors’ Guarantee granted by CNB in favour of all of AGB’s creditors when AGB first encountered difficulties in September 1996.
Eden od ukrepov, ki jih ni treba dodatno proučiti, so jamstva za vlagatelje, ki jih je Češka narodna banka izdala vsem upnikom AGB septembra 1996, ko se je AGB prvič spopadla s težavami.
The Depositors’ Guarantee covered all of AGB’s liabilities, including interest payable, registered in AGB’s accounts as at 17 September 1996.
Jamstva za vlagatelje so vključevala vse obveznosti AGB, vključno z obveznostmi iz naslova obresti, evidentiranimi na računih AGB 17. septembra 1996.
Any liabilities maturing within a fixed term were secured until maturity.
Vse obveznosti, ki zapadejo v določenem roku, so bile zavarovane do datuma zapadlosti.
Liabilities having no fixed maturity term were secured for a period of 12 months following the completion of the forced administration of AGB.
Obveznosti, ki niso imele določenega roka zapadlosti, so bile zavarovane 12 mesecev po prenehanju izvajanja izredne uprave v AGB.
Liabilities incurred by AGB after 17 September 1996 were secured until their respective maturity date or maximum of 12 months following the completion of the forced administration of AGB whichever was the earlier.
Obveznosti, ki si jih je AGB nabrala po 17. septembru 1996, so bile zavarovane do ustreznega datuma njihove zapadlosti ali največ 12 mesecev po prenehanju izvajanja izredne uprave v AGB, kar je bilo prej.
The guarantee did not set any upper limit for the secured liabilities to AGB’s creditors.
V jamstvih ni bila določena zgornja meja zavarovanih obveznosti do upnikov AGB.
As of 31 December 2003 however, there was only one deposit of CZK 867882 remaining that could potentially fall under the Depositors’ Guarantee [5].
Dne 31. decembra 2003 je bil samo en depozit v znesku 867882 CZK, ki bi mogoče lahko spadal pod jamstva za vlagatelje. [5]
In the context of the sale, GECB’s parent company GECIH assumed the CNB’s obligations under the Depositor’s Guarantee through a counter guarantee, which expired on 22 June 2000.
V okviru prodaje je korporacija GECIH, ki je matično podjetje banke GECB, prevzela obveznosti ČNB, zavarovane z jamstvi za vlagatelje, s posrednim jamstvom, ki je poteklo 22. junija 2000.
From the beginning, the counter guarantee would have terminated in the event that GECIH exercised its put option right for the shares in GECB.
Že od vsega začetka je veljalo, da bi posredno jamstvo prenehalo, če bi korporacija GECIH uresničila pravico prodajne opcije za deleže v GECB.
After the sale of AGB1 to GECB, the rest of AGB including AGB2 went into liquidation.
Po prodaji AGB1 banki GECB je šel preostanek AGB, vključno z AGB2, v likvidacijski postopek.
In the ongoing liquidation process CNB is the sole creditor of AGB.
V likvidacijskem postopku, ki še poteka, je ČNB edini upnik AGB.
Financial situation of GECB
Finančno stanje GECB
The results of AGB’s banking business have substantially improved since GECB took it over.
Potem ko jo je prevzela GECB, so se rezultati bančnega poslovanja AGB precej izboljšali.
[6]Year
[6]Leto
Net income
Čisti dobiček
(in CZK million)
(v milijonih CZK)
Capital adequacy ratio
Količnik kapitalske ustreznosti
Negative [6]
Negativen [6]
Restructuring efforts made by AGB, GECB and GECIH
Prizadevanja AGB, GECB in GECIH za prestrukturiranje
The Czech Republic and GECB submit that AGB, GECB and GECIH adopted measures to mitigate the State involvement in the restructuring of AGB.
Češka republika in GECB trdita, da so AGB, GECB in GECIH sprejele ukrepe za ublažitev vključenosti države v prestrukturiranje AGB.
AGB’s compensatory steps consisted of making AGB’s own assets liquid and in particular the sale of certain AGB subsidiaries to Raiffeisen Bank.
Kompenzacijski ukrepi AGB so vključevali zagotovitev likvidnosti njenih lastnih sredstev in zlasti prodajo nekaterih njenih podružnic Raiffeisen Banki.
This diminished AGB’s market share as measured by AGB’s share of total banking assets or certain asset classes.
To je zmanjšalo tržni delež AGB, izmerjen z deležem skupnih bančnih sredstev ali nekaterih vrst sredstev banke AGB.
Apart from that, AGB reduced its numbers of employees from about 3500 in 1996 to about 2500 employees in 1998.
AGB je tudi zmanjšala število zaposlenih s približno 3500 leta 1996 na približno 2500 zaposlenih leta 1998.
It was argued that GECB and GECIH had contributed to the restructuring by paying the purchase price, by the purchaser warranties in the Deed of Warranties referred to in recital 20 and by the counter guarantee in the Indemnity Agreement referred to therein by which GECIH took over CNB’s liability (Depositors’ Guarantee) towards the creditors of AGB.
Zagovarjalo se je stališče, da sta GECB in GECIH prispevali k prestrukturiranju s plačilom nakupne cene, kupčevimi jamstvi iz Dogovora o jamstvih iz uvodne izjave 20 in posrednim jamstvom iz Sporazuma o garanciji iz iste izjave, s katerimi je GECIH prevzela obveznosti ČNB („Jamstva za vlagatelje“) do upnikov AGB.
In addition, the GE group believes that it contributed by way of the Put Option as well as by its excellent reputation.
Poleg tega GE-group meni, da je prispevala tudi s prodajno opcijo in svojim dobrim ugledom.
In its Decision of 14 July 2004, the Commission assessed the measures notified to it and came to the conclusion that the majority of them fell outside the scope of the interim mechanism of the Accession Treaty.
V svoji odločitvi z dne 14. julija 2004 je Komisija proučila ukrepe, ki so ji bili priglašeni, in sklenila, da večina teh ukrepov ne spada pod začasni mehanizem iz Pogodbe o pristopu.
These measures did not lead to any further financial exposure of the Czech Republic after the accession date and therefore were not applicable after accession.
Ti ukrepi niso povzročili dodatne finančne izpostavljenosti Češke republike po pristopu in se zato po pristopu niso uporabljali.
However, two sets of measures were considered to be applicable after accession, and potentially to constitute State aid incompatible with the common market — firstly the Warranties and Indemnities and secondly the Put Option.
Po pristopu naj bi se uporabljali dve vrsti ukrepov, ki naj bi mogoče pomenili državno pomoč, nezdružljivo s skupnim trgom – prvič, jamstva in garancije, in drugič, prodajna opcija.
The Warranties and Indemnities
Jamstva in garancije
In the course of the sale of AGB1 to GECB, AGB as the seller of AGB1 entered into a number of guarantee arrangements in favour of GECB which are set out in the Deed of Warranties, signed on 21 June 1998.
Pri prodaji AGB1 banki GECB je banka AGB kot prodajalka AGB1 v korist banke GECB dosegla številne dogovore o jamstvih, ki so navedeni v Dogovoru o jamstvih, podpisanem 21. junija 1998.
CNB was not a party to this agreement.
ČNB ni bila podpisnica tega dogovora.
However, the commitments made by AGB in the Deed of Warranties were backed by the CNB in the Indemnity Agreement, signed on 22 June 1998 and amended on 25 April 2004 by the Amendment No 1 to Indemnity Agreement (Indemnity Agreement) [7].
Vendar je obveznosti AGB iz Dogovora o jamstvih zavarovala ČNB v Sporazumu o garanciji, ki je bil podpisan 22. junija 1998 in spremenjen 25. aprila 2004 s Spremembo št. 1 Sporazuma o garanciji („Sporazum o garanciji“) [7].
The Czech authorities provided lists of the guarantee arrangements as part of the Rescue and Restructuring Plan that forms part of the notification.
Češki organi so v okviru načrta za reševanje in prestrukturiranje, ki je sestavni del priglasitve, predložili dva seznama dogovorov o jamstvih.
In the notification, the Czech Republic stated that the list relating to the Deed of Warranties was ‘not exhaustive’.
V priglasitvi je Češka republika navedla, da seznam, ki se nanaša na Dogovor o jamstvih, „ni izčrpen“.
In its comments on the decision to open the formal investigation procedure, however, the Czech Republic clarified that the list indeed comprised exhaustive lists of all potential claims.
V svojih pripombah k odločitvi o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave je Češka republika pojasnila, da seznam dejansko vsebuje izčrpne popise vse morebitnih zahtevkov.
The wording ‘not exhaustive’ merely meant that the lists did not repeat the full texts of the underlying agreements.
Izraz „ni izčrpen“ samo pomeni, da se v seznamih ne ponovijo celotna besedila osnovnih dogovorov.
GECB argued that in fact only the — exhaustive — list concerning the Indemnity Agreement would be relevant since the other list related only to the claims under the Deed of Warranties, which is an agreement between private parties that could not be relevant for State aid purposes.
GECB je trdila, da bi bil ustrezen samo izčrpen seznam v zvezi s Sporazumom o garanciji, ker se drugi seznam nanaša samo na zahtevke iz Dogovora o jamstvih, ki je dogovor med zasebnimi strankami in ne more biti pomemben za namene državne pomoči.
Many of the potential claims had already expired before the accession of the Czech Republic to the European Union.
Številni morebitni zahtevki so potekli že pred pristopom Češke republike k Evropski uniji.
In its Decision of 14 July 2004, the Commission declared those measures which had already expired before accession not to be applicable after accession.
Komisija je v svoji odločitvi z dne 14. julija 2004 menila, da se tisti ukrepi, ki so potekli že pred pristopom, po pristopu niso uporabljali.
With respect to the other measures the Commission opened the formal investigation procedure.
V zvezi z drugimi ukrepi je Komisija sprožila formalni postopek preiskave.
The opening of the formal investigation procedure also concerns measures for which the Czech Republic did not ask for an assessment under the interim mechanism.
Sprožitev formalnega postopka preiskave se nanaša tudi na ukrepe, za katere Češka republika ni zaprosila za presojo na podlagi začasnega mehanizma.
Notably, certain Warranties and Indemnities and the Put Option, which were described in the notification but not included in the request for assessment.
Zlasti se nanaša na nekatera jamstva in garancije ter prodajno opcijo, ki so bili opisani v priglasitvi, vendar niso bili vključeni v prošnjo za presojo.
In its Decision to open the formal investigation procedure the Commission explained that under the interim mechanism of Annex IV.3 of the Act of Accession there was no obligation on the part of the acceding countries to notify measures and therefore it was in principle possible to limit the scope of the notification.
V svoji odločitvi o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave je Komisija pojasnila, da v skladu z začasnim mehanizmom iz Priloge IV.3 Akta o pristopu državam pristopnicam ni treba priglasiti ukrepov, zato je bilo načeloma mogoče omejiti obseg priglasitve.
However, the Commission considered that the Warranties and Indemnities and the Put Option were inextricably linked to the notified measures and could not be artificially separated.
Vendar je Komisija menila, da so bila jamstva in garancije ter prodajna opcija neločljivo povezani s priglašenimi ukrepi in jih ni mogoče umetno ločiti.
Consequently the Commission has to assess the measures in their entirety.
Zato mora Komisija ukrepe presoditi v celoti.
The guarantee arrangements on which the Commission opened the procedure are summarised as follows:
Sledi povzetek dogovorov o jamstvih, za katere je Komisija sprožila postopek preiskave:
Warranties and indemnities expiring on 22 June 2008
Jamstva in garancije, ki potečejo 22. junija 2008
Limitation of the amount
Omejitev zneska
Indemnification for any litigation adversely affecting the banking business: AGB agreed to indemnify the GECIH, GECB and other purchaser’s indemnified persons (the Purchaser) in respect of any losses resulting from any claims brought against the Purchaser as a result of any matter occurring prior to the Closing Date which adversely affects the banking business.
Odškodnina za kateri koli pravdni spor, ki bi neugodno vplival na bančno poslovanje: AGB soglaša, da bo GECIH, GECB in drugim oškodovancem kupca (kupcu) poravnala škodo zaradi izgub, ki bi izhajale iz zahtevkov, ki bi se vložili proti kupcu kot posledica katere koli zadeve, ki bi se zgodila pred datumom zaprtja banke in bi neugodno vplivala na bančno poslovanje.
Clause 5.1(a)(i) [8]
Določba 5.1(a)(i) [8]
Aggregate limit of CZK 2000 million
Skupni znesek omejitve 2000 milijonov CZK
Indemnification for violation of law: AGB agreed to indemnify the Purchaser in respect of any losses resulting from any violation by the Seller prior to the closing date of any applicable law or regulation which adversely affects the banking business.
Odškodnina zaradi kršitev zakonov: AGB soglaša, da bo kupcu poravnala škodo zaradi izgub, ki bi izhajale iz prodajalčevih kršitev katerega koli veljavnega zakona ali predpisa pred datumom zaprtja banke, ki bi neugodno vplivale na bančno poslovanje.
Clause 5.1(a)(ii)
Določba 5.1(a)(ii)
Indemnification in respect of employment litigation: AGB agreed to indemnify the Purchaser in respect of any losses resulting from any claims brought against GECB by any of the employees in relation to any actual or alleged act or omission by the Seller prior to the Closing Date.
Odškodnina pri pravdnih sporih z zaposlenimi: AGB soglaša, da bo kupcu poravnala škodo zaradi izgub, ki bi izhajale iz katerega koli zahtevka, ki bi ga proti GECB vložil kdor koli od zaposlenih v zvezi s katerim koli resničnim ali domnevnim dejanjem ali opustitvijo prodajalca pred datumom zaprtja banke.
Clause 5.1.(a)(v)
Določba 5.1(a)(v)
Indemnification in respect of employment litigation: AGB agreed to indemnify the Purchaser in respect of any losses resulting from any claims relating to any contract duty or liability of employment with any retained employee or any former, existing or future employee of the Seller who is an employee relating to AGB2.
Odškodnina pri pravdnih sporih z zaposlenimi: AGB soglaša, da bo kupcu poravnala škodo zaradi izgub, ki bi izhajale iz katerega koli zahtevka v zvezi s katero koli pogodbeno obveznostjo glede zaposlitve obdržanih zaposlenih ali nekdanjih, sedanjih ali prihodnjih zaposlenih pri prodajalcu, ki so zaposleni v AGB2.
Clause 5.1.(a)(vi)
Določba 5.1(a)(vi)
Action for the declaration of invalidity of the agreement concerning the sale of AGB1 to GECB brought on 27 July 1998 with the Regional Commercial Court in Prague by Václav Sládek against AGB in liquidation and the Purchaser; and with the association of minority shareholders of AGB as a side plaintiff.
Tožba za ugotovitev ničnosti pogodbe o prodaji AGB1 banki GECB, ki jo je vložil 27. julija 1998 pri Okrožnem gospodarskem sodišču v Pragi Václav Sládek proti AGB v likvidaciji in kupcu, skupaj z združenjem manjšinskih delničarjev AGB kot stranskim tožnikom.
(Indemnification based on Clause 4.1 of the Indemnity Agreement)
(Odškodnina na podlagi določbe 4.1 Sporazuma o garanciji)
Aggregate limit of CZK 15000 million
Skupni znesek omejitve 15000 milijonov CZK
Action for the declaration of invalidity of the agreement concerning the sale of AGB1 to GECB brought on 22 June 2001 with the Regional Commercial Court in Prague by Petr Maur, František Vysloužil, Pavel Tykač, Karel Tománek, Pavel Šimek and Tomáš Fohler against AGB in liquidation, the Purchaser and Jiři Klumpar; and with the association of minority shareholders of AGB as a side plaintiff.
Tožba za ugotovitev ničnosti pogodbe o prodaji AGB1 GECB, ki so jo vložili 22. junija 2001 pri Okrožnem gospodarskem sodišču v Pragi Petr Maur, František Vysloužil, Pavel Tykač, Karel Tománek, Pavel Šimek in Tomáš Fohler proti AGB v likvidaciji, kupcu in Jiřiju Klumparju, skupaj z združenjem manšinjskih delničarjev AGB kot stranskim oškodovancem.
Action for Declaration of the Validity of the Agreement on the sale of AGB1 brought on 18 June 2002 with the Municipal Court in Prague by HZ Praha, spol. s.r.o. against AGB in liquidation, the Purchaser and Jiři Klumpar.
Tožba za ugotovitev ničnosti pogodbe o prodaji AGB1, ki jo je vložilo 18. junija 2002 pri Občinskem sodišču v Pragi podjetje HZ Praha, spol. s.r.o., proti AGB v likvidaciji, kupcu in Jiřiju Klumparju.
Application for Registration of the Sale of AGB1 in the Commercial Registry made on 18 October 1999, and in which the applicant is currently AGB in liquidation and the Prague Municipal State Prosecutor Office has joint as a party to the proceeding.
Vloga za vpis prodaje AGB1 v trgovinski register, oddana 18. oktobra 1999, katere vlagatelj je sedanja AGB v likvidaciji, kot stranka v postopku pa se ji je pridružil občinski urad državnega tožilca iz Prage.
Any claim for Indemnification concerning the validity or legitimacy of the sale of AGB1 to the Purchaser brought by:
Vsi odškodninski zahtevki v zvezi z veljavnostjo ali legitimnostjo prodaje AGB1 kupcu, ki jih vložijo:
The Seller, CNB, or a shareholder, liquidator, bankruptcy trustee, auditor or forced administrator of the Seller
prodajalec, ČNB ali delničar, likvidacijski upravitelj, stečajni upravitelj, revizor ali izredni upravitelj prodajalca,
A member of a corporate body of the Seller or the Purchaser
član pravne osebe prodajalca ali kupca,
An employee, borrower, client, lender, or creditor to the Seller or the Purchaser
zaposleni, posojilojemalec, komitent, posojilodajalec ali upnik prodajalca ali kupca,
A heir, legal successor or assignee, liquidator, bankruptcy trustee, receiver, trustee, administrator or forced administrator (or a person having similar powers), or association of one or more of the above-listed individuals and entities, or
dedič, pravni naslednik ali prejemnik odstopljene pravice, likvidacijski upravitelj, stečajni upravitelj, skrbnik, upravljalec ali izredni upravitelj (ali oseba s podobnimi pooblastili), ali združenje enih ali več prej naštetih fizičnih in pravnih oseb, ali
A Czech State prosecutor, Czech criminal authority, or Czech tax authority having jurisdiction over the Seller or the Purchaser.
češki državni tožilec, češki organ pregona ali češki davčni organ, ki so pristojni za kupca ali prodajalca.
Warranties and indemnities expiring on 22 June 2010
Jamstva in garancije, ki potečejo 22. junija 2010
Taxes: AGB warrants that it has:
Davki: AGB jamči, da je
complied with the relevant withholding tax requirements imposed by all applicable laws;
upoštevala ustrezne zahteve za davčne odtegljaje iz vseh veljavnih zakonov;
it has disclosed to the Purchaser the existence of any taxes claimed by any tax authority to be due and owing by AGB;
kupcu razkrila vse davke, za katere davčni organi trdijo, da so zapadli in za katere je zavezanka AGB;
no tax audit is pending or, to AGB’s knowledge, threatened with respect to any taxes due from AGB; and
da ne poteka nobena davčna revizija niti ne ve, da bi ji grozila v zvezi z davki, ki jih dolguje; in
it has not been nor is in violation of any applicable tax law, which would create a liability for the Purchaser; and
ni bila niti ni v kršitvi veljavne zakonodaje, ki bi povzročila obveznost za kupca in
no tax will be imposed on the Purchaser as a result of the consummation of the transactions contemplated.
kupcu ne bo obračunan davek zaradi izvršitve predvidenih transakcij.
Clause 2.14(c) and (d).
Določba 2.14(c) in (d)
Environmental matters: AGB warrants that, as far as it is aware, no hazardous substances are located on any premises of AGB1 in concentrations exceeding those allowed by the applicable law.
Okoljske zadeve: AGB jamči, da kolikor ve, v prostorih AGB1 ni nevarnih snovi v koncentracijah, ki bi presegale koncentracije, ki jih dovoljuje veljavna zakonodaja.
Clause 2.20
Določba 2.20.
Aggregate limit of CZK 5000 million
Skupni znesek omejitve 5000 milijonov CZK
Taxes in connection with transaction: AGB warrants that no taxes will be imposed on the Purchaser as a result of the consummation of the sale.
Davki v zvezi s prodajo: AGB jamči, da se kupcu zaradi izvršene prodaje ne bo obračunal davek.
Clause 2.14(e)
Določba 2.14(e)
Non-business assets and liabilities: AGB agreed to indemnify the Purchaser in respect of any losses resulting from any claims relating to any non-business assets or non-business liabilities.
Neposlovna sredstva in obveznosti: AGB soglaša, da bo kupcu poravnala škodo zaradi vseh izgub, ki bi izhajale iz zahtevkov v zvezi z neposlovnimi sredstvi ali neposlovnimi obveznostmi.