natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation, this subsidy amount was allocated over the export turnover generated by all export sales of the product concerned during the review IP (the denominator), because the subsidy is contingent upon export performance and it was not granted by reference to the quantities manufactured, produced, exported or transported.
V skladu s členom 7(2) osnovne uredbe je bil ta znesek subvencije dodeljen za skupni promet od izvoza zadevnega izdelka v OP v zvezi s pregledom (imenovalec), ker je subvencija odvisna od opravljenega izvoza in ni bila dodeljena glede na izdelane, proizvedene, izvožene ali transportirane količine.
The subsidy margin thus obtained was 0,04 %.
Tako določena stopnja subvencije znaša 0,04 %.
Exemption from import duties (basic customs duty and special additional customs duty) and reimbursement of central sales tax on capital goods
Oprostitev uvoznih dajatev (osnovna carina in posebna dodatna carina) in povračilo centralnega prometnega davka na investicijsko blago
In accordance with Article 7(3) of the basic Regulation, the benefit was calculated on the basis of the amount of unpaid customs duty on imported capital goods and of the amount of sales tax reimbursed on purchases of capital goods, both spread across a period which reflected the normal depreciation period of such capital goods in the industry of the product concerned.
V skladu s členom 7(3) osnovne uredbe je bila ugodnost izračunana na osnovi višine neplačanih carin na uvoženo investicijsko blago in zneska povrnjenega prometnega davka na nakup proizvodnih sredstev med obdobjem, ki odraža normalno amortizacijsko dobo takšnega investicijskega blaga v industriji zadevnega izdelka.
The company claimed that this should have been the depreciation rate actually used by the company in its financial statements; however, the requirement in Article 7(3) is interpreted to refer to the depreciation rate specified in the legislation applicable to the company, in this case the rate specified in the Companies Act 1956.
Družba je trdila, da bi to morala biti amortizacijska stopnja, ki jo družba dejansko uporablja v svojih računodskih izkazih, vendar pa se zahteve iz člena 7(3) razlagajo tako, da se nanašajo na amortizacijsko stopnjo v zakonodaji, ki jo uporablja navedena družba, v tem primeru stopnjo, določeno v Zakonu o gospodarskih družbah iz leta 1956.
The amount so calculated which is then attributable to the review IP was adjusted by adding interest during this period in order to reflect the value of the benefit over time and thereby establishing the full benefit of this scheme to the recipient.
Tako izračunan znesek, ki velja za OP v zvezi s pregledom, je bil popravljen z dodatkom obresti za to obdobje, da odraža vrednost ugodnosti med tem obdobjem in tako ugotovi celotno ugodnost iz te sheme za prejemnika.
Fees necessarily incurred to obtain the subsidy were deducted in accordance with Article 7(1)(a) of the basic Regulation from this sum to arrive at the subsidy amount as the numerator.
Obvezne pristojbine za pridobitev subvencije so bile v skladu s členom 7(1)(a) osnovne uredbe odštete od te vsote, tako ugotovljena višina subvencije pa določena kot števec.
In accordance with Article 7(2) and 7(3) of the basic Regulation this subsidy amount was allocated over the export turnover of sales of the product concerned during the review IP as the appropriate denominator, because the subsidy is contingent upon export performance and was not granted by reference to the quantities manufactured, produced, exported or transported.
V skladu s členoma 7(2) in 7(3) osnovne uredbe je ta višina subvencije dodeljena na izvozni promet zadevnega izdelka v OP v zvezi s pregledom kot ustrezen imenovalec, ker je subvencija pogojena z opravljenim izvozom in ni bila dodeljena glede na izdelane, proizvedene, izvožene ali transportirane količine.
The company claimed that deemed exports should be included in the total export turnover, but this claim was rejected for the reasons set out in recital 36 above.
Družba je trdila, da bi moral biti imenovani izvoz vključen v skupni izvozni promet, vendar je bil ta zahtevek zavrnjen zaradi razlogov, navedenih v uvodni izjavi 36.
The subsidy margin thus obtained was 1,26 %.
Tako določena stopnja subvencije znaša 1,26 %.
Thus, the total subsidy margin under the EOU scheme for Jindal amounts to 1,3 %.
Tako skupna stopnja subvencije v okviru sheme EOU za družbo Jindal znaša 1,3 %.
A detailed description of the EPCGS can be found in Chapter 5 of the FTP 2004 to 2009 and in Chapter 5 of the HOP I 2004 to 2009.
Podroben opis EPCGS se nahaja v odstavku 5 FTP 2004–2009 in poglavju 5 HOP I 2004–2009.
Any manufacturer-exporter and merchant-exporter ‘tied to’ a supporting manufacturer or service provider is eligible for this scheme.
Vsak proizvajalec izvoznik in trgovec izvoznik, ki je „povezan“ s spremljajočim proizvajalcem in izvajalcem storitev, je upravičen do te sheme.
Jindal was found to benefit from this scheme during the review IP.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je imela družba Jindal v OP v zvezi s pregledom ugodnosti iz te sheme.
Under the condition of an export obligation, a company is allowed to import capital goods (new and — since April 2003 — second-hand capital goods up to 10 years old) at a reduced rate of duty.
Pod pogojem obveznosti izvoza je družbi dovoljen uvoz investicijskega blaga (novega in od aprila 2003 do deset let starega rabljenega blaga) po znižani stopnji dajatve.
Conclusion on the EPCGS
Ugotovitev o EPCGS
The EPCGS provides subsidies within the meaning of Article 2(1)(a)(ii) and Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, as the GOI foregoes revenue otherwise due.
EPCGS zagotavlja subvencije v smislu člena 2(1)(a)(ii) in člena 2(2) osnovne uredbe, saj se indijska vlada odpove prihodku, ki bi sicer zapadel v plačilo.
In addition, the duty reduction confers a benefit upon the exporter because the non-payment of duties saved upon importation improves its liquidity.
Poleg tega znižanje dajatve izvozniku prinese korist, saj zaradi neplačila dajatev, privarčevanih pri uvozu, izboljšajo njegovo likvidnost.
Further, the EPCGS is contingent in law upon export performance, since such licences cannot be obtained without a commitment to export.
Poleg tega je EPCGS zakonsko odvisna od opravljenega izvoza, ker takšnih dovoljenj ni mogoče dobiti brez izpolnjevanja obveznosti izvoza.
The scheme cannot be considered a permissible duty drawback system or substitution drawback system within the meaning of Article 2(1)(a)(ii) to the basic Regulation.
Shema se ne more šteti za dovoljen sistem povračil dajatev ali nadomestni sistem vračil v smislu člena 2(1)(a)(ii) osnovne uredbe.
Capital goods are not covered by the scope of such permissible systems, as set out in Annex I, item (i) to the basic Regulation, because they are not consumed in the production of the exported products.
Dovoljeni sistemi, določeni v točki (i) Priloge I osnovne uredbe, ne zajemajo investicijskega blaga, ker se ne uporablja v proizvodnji izvoznih izdelkov.
The numerator was established as follows: the subsidy amount was calculated, in accordance with Article 7(3) of the basic Regulation, on the basis of unpaid customs duty on imported capital goods spread over a period which reflects the normal depreciation period of such capital goods in the PET film industry, which, for the reasons set out in recital 56 above, was deemed to be the rate specified in the Companies Act 1956 and not the one actually used by the company.
Števec je bil izračunan na naslednji način: znesek subvencije je bil izračunan v skladu s členom 7(3) osnovne uredbe na podlagi neplačanih carin na uvoženo investicijsko blago v obdobju, ki odraža običajno amortizacijsko dobo takšnega investicijskega blaga v industriji folije iz PET, ki naj bi bila stopnja, določena v Zakonu o gospodarskih družbah iz leta 1956, in ne stopnja, ki jo družba običajno uporablja, zaradi razlogov iz uvodne izjave 56.
Interest was added to this amount in order to reflect the full value of the benefit over time.
Temu znesku so bile dodane obresti, da bi se upoštevala polna vrednost ugodnosti v določenem času.
The company claimed that capital goods imported duty-free under the ECPG scheme for use in the Khanvel unit were no longer in use and that the benefit relating to such goods should not be included in the numerator.
Družba je trdila, da investicijska sredstva, uvožena brez dajatev v okviru sheme ECPG za uporabo v enoti Khanvel, niso več v uporabi, in da se koristi, povezane s takšnim blagom, ne smejo vključiti v števec.
However, as there is no evidence that the company no longer possesses such goods or that it will not use them again, the Commission must reject this claim.
Vendar pa Komisija mora zavrniti to trditev, ker ni dokazov, da družba nima več takšnega blaga ali da ga ne bo več uporabljala.
In accordance with Article 7(2) and 7(3) of the basic Regulation, this subsidy amount was allocated over the export turnover of the product concerned generated during the review IP (the denominator), as the subsidy is contingent upon export performance.
V skladu s členom 7(2) in (3) osnovne uredbe je ta znesek subvencije dodeljen na izvozni promet zadevnega izdelka v OP v zvezi s pregledom (imenovalec), ker je subvencija odvisna od opravljenega izvoza.
The subsidy obtained by Jindal is 1,11 %.
Subvencija, ki jo je dobila družba Jindal, znaša 1,11 %.
Export Income Tax Exemption Scheme (EITES)
Shema oprostitve davka na dohodek od izvoza (Export Income Tax Exemption Scheme – „SODDI“)
Export Oriented Units e.g. may claim income tax exemptions under section 10B of the Income Tax Act 1961.
Izvozno usmerjene enote npr. lahko zahtevajo davčno oprostitev v okviru oddelka 10B Zakona o davku na dohodek iz leta 1961.
As Jindal was not found to have availed itself of any benefits under the EITES no further analysis of the countervailability of this scheme is necessary.
Ker ni bilo ugotovljeno, da bi družba Jindal koristila ugodnosti iz EITES, ni treba analizirati možnosti uvedbe izravnalnih ukrepov za to shemo.
Conclusion on the ECS
Ugotovitev o ECS
This preferential financing amounts to a subsidy, which is deemed to be specific and countervailable, since the preferential interest rates are contingent upon export performance pursuant to Article 3(4)(a) of the basic Regulation.
To preferenčno financiranje pomeni isto kot subvencija, ki se šteje za specifično in proti kateri se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, ker so preferencialne obrestne mere odvisne od opravljenega izvoza v smislu člena 3(4)(a) osnovne uredbe.
The subsidy amount was calculated on the basis of the difference between the interest paid for export credits used during the review IP and the amount that would have been payable if market interest rates had been charged, as for ordinary commercial loans made by the company.
Višina subvencije je bila izračunana na podlagi razlike med obrestmi, plačanimi za izvozne kredite, uporabljene v OP v zvezi s pregledom, in zneskom, ki bi bil plačan, če bi se uporabljale enake tržne obrestne mere kot za običajne komercialne kredite, ki jih najema družba.
The subsidy amount (numerator) was allocated over the total export turnover during the review investigation period (denominator) in accordance with Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation, as the subsidy is contingent upon export performance and is not granted by reference to quantities manufactured, produced, exported or transported.
Znesek subvencije (števec) je bil dodeljen na skupni izvozni promet v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom (imenovalec) v skladu s členom 7(2) osnovne uredbe, ker je subvencija odvisna od opravljenega izvoza in ni dodeljena glede na izdelane, proizvedene, izvožene ali transportirane količine.
Jindal availed itself of benefits under the ECS and obtained a subsidy of 0,1 %.
Družba Jindal je koristila ugodnosti iz ECS in prejela subvencije v višini 0,1 %.
The legal basis for this scheme is contained in paragraph 4.2 of the FTP 2004 to 2009.
Pravna podlaga te sheme se nahaja v odstavku 4.2 FTP 2004–2009.
As Jindal was not found to have availed itself of any benefits under the DFRC during the review IP, no further analysis of the countervailability of this scheme is necessary.
Ker ni bilo ugotovljeno, da bi družba Jindal koristila ugodnosti iz DFRC v času OP v zvezi s pregledom, ni treba analizirati možnosti uvedbe izravnalnih ukrepov za to shemo.
Regional Scheme
Regionalna shema
In order to encourage the establishment of industries in less developed areas of the State, the GOM has been granting incentives to new expansion units set up in developing regions of the State, since 1964, under a scheme commonly known as the ‘Package Scheme of Incentives’.
Da bi spodbudila širjenje industrije na manj razvita območja države, vlada Maharaštre od leta 1964 v okviru sheme, splošno znane kot „paketna shema spodbud“, dodeljuje ugodnosti za enote, ki se na novo širijo v regijah v razvoju te države.
The scheme has been amended several times since its introduction and the ‘1993 scheme’ was eligible for application from 1 October 1993 to 31 March 2001, whereas the latest amendment, the PSI 2006, was introduced in the margins of the ‘Industrial, Investment & Infrastructure Policy of Maharashtra 2006’ in spring 2006 and is foreseen to be eligible for application up to 31 March 2011.
Shema je bila od svoje uvedbe večkrat spremenjena in „shema 1993“ se je uporabljala od 1. oktobra 1993 do 31. marca 2001; zadnja sprememba, PSI 2006, je bila sprejeta spomladi 2006 v okviru „industrijske politike, politike vlaganj in infrastrukturne politike Maharaštre 2006“, za katero se predvideva, da se bo uporabljala do 31. marca 2011.
The PSI of the GOM is composed of several sub-schemes, the main one being direct grants via a so-called industrial promotion subsidy, the exemption from local sales tax and electricity duty and the refund of octroi tax.
PSI vlade Maharaštre sestavlja več podshem, med katerimi so glavne neposredne dotacije v obliki t.i. industrijskih spodbudnih subvencij, oprostitev lokalnega prometnega davka in dajatev za elektriko ter povračilo davka, imenovanega davek „octroi“.
Jindal continues to avail itself of incentives under the PSI 1993 until May 2011 and not under successor schemes.
Družba Jindal še naprej uporablja spodbude v okviru PSI 1993 do maja 2001 in ne v okviru shem, ki so jo nasledile.
Consequently, only the PSI 1993 was assessed in the context of the case at hand.
Zato je v okviru tega primera bil ocenjen zgolj PSI 1993.
In order to be eligible, companies must invest in less developed areas, either by setting up a new industrial establishment or by making a large-scale capital investment in expansion or diversification of an existing industrial establishment.
Za upravičenost do te sheme morajo družbe vlagati v slabše razvita območja, bodisi z vzpostavitvijo novega industrijskega obrata bodisi z veliko kapitalsko naložbo v razširitev ali diverzifikacijo obstoječega industrijskega obrata.
These areas are classified, according to their economic development, into different categories (e.g. less developed area, lesser developed area and least developed area).
Ta območja so razdeljena na različne kategorije glede na njihov gospodarski razvoj (npr. slabo razvita območja, slabše razvita območja in najmanj razvita območja).
The main criterion to establish the amount of incentives is the area in which the enterprise is or will be located and the size of the investment.
Glavno merilo za določitev višine spodbud je območje, v katerem je ali bo sedež družbe, in obseg naložbe.
Remission of local sales tax on sales of finished goods: goods are normally subject to central sales tax (for inter-State sales) or, in the past, State sales tax (for intra-State sales) at varying levels, depending upon the State(s) in which transactions are made.
Odpust lokalnega prometnega davka na prodajo končnega blaga: za blago je treba običajno plačati osnovni prometni davek (v primeru meddržavne prodaje) ali v preteklosti državni prometni davek (za prodajo znotraj držav) na različnih ravneh, odvisno od države/držav, v kateri(-h) poteka poslovanje.
In April 2005 the sales tax legislation for intra-State sales in Maharashtra was replaced by a value added tax (VAT) system.
Zakon o prometnem davku v primeru meddržavne prodaje v Maharaštri je bil aprila 2005 zamenjan s sistemom davka na dodano vrednost („DDV“).
Jindal was found to have benefited from this exemption in relation to sales transactions during the review IP.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je imela družba Jindal v OP v zvezi s pregledom ugodnosti iz te sheme v zvezi s prodajnimi transakcijami.
Reimbursement of electricity duty: eligible units are eligible for refund of electricity duty on the electricity consumed for production purposes for a period of seven years from the date of commercial production.
Povračilo dajatev za elektriko: Upravičene enote so upravičene do povračila dajatev za elektriko na elektriko, ki so jo potrošile za namene proizvodnje v obdobju sedmih let od dneva tržne proizvodnje.
In the case of Jindal this seven-year period lapsed on 31 March 2003.
V primeru družbe Jindal se je obdobje teh sedmih let izteklo 31. marca 2003.
Consequently, Jindal was no longer eligible for the reimbursement of electricity duty.
Tako družba Jindal ni bila več upravičena do povračila dajatve za elektriko.
Refund of the octroi tax: octroi is a tax levied by local Governments in India, including the GOM, on goods that enter the territorial limits of a town.
Povračilo davka, imenovanega davek „octroi“: „Octroi“ je davek, ki ga pobirajo lokalne vlade v Indiji, vključno z vlado Maharaštre, za blago, ki vstopi na ozemlje določenega mesta.
Industrial enterprises are entitled to a refund of the octroi tax from the GOM if their facility is located in certain specified towns within the territory of the State.
Industrijska podjetja lahko od vlade Maharaštre zahtevajo povračilo davka „octroi“, če je njihov obrat v določenih mestih znotraj ozemlja države.
Jindal’s plant is located outside city limits and is therefore per se exempt from octroi tax, with the result that this sub-scheme is not applicable in the present case.
Obrat družbe Jindal se nahaja zunaj meja mesta; zato je per se oproščen davka „octroi“, tako da se ta podshema v tem primeru ne uporablja.
Conclusion on the PSI 1993 of the GOM
Sklepna ugotovitev glede PSI 1993 vlade Maharaštre
Jindal only accrued remission rights of sales tax on sales of finished goods during the review IP, which in the past has been found not to confer a benefit on the recipient (recital 114 of Regulation (EC) No 367/2006).
Družba Jindal si je pridobila samo pravico do odpusta prometnega davka na prodajo končnega blaga med OP v zvezi s pregledom, za katero je bilo preteklosti ugotovljeno, da za prejemnika ne prinaša ugodnosti (uvodna izjava (114) Uredbe (ES) št. 367/2006).
Consequently, the PSI is not countervailable in the present case.
Zato se v tem primeru proti PSI ne uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi.
The amount of countervailable subsidies determined in accordance with the basic Regulation, expressed ad valorem, for the investigated exporting producer is 17,1 %.
Znesek subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, določen v skladu z določbami osnovne uredbe in izražen ad valorem, za preiskovanega proizvajalca izvoznika znaša 17,1 %.
In accordance with Article 19(2) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether the continuation of the existing measure was insufficient to counteract the countervailable subsidy which is causing injury.
V skladu s členom 19(2) osnovne uredbe je bilo proučeno, ali bi nadaljevanje veljavnih ukrepov zadoščalo za preprečevanje subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi in ki povzročajo škodo.
It was established that, during the review IP, Jindal continued to benefit from countervailable subsidisation by the Indian authorities.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je v OP v zvezi s pregledom družba Jindal še naprej koristila subvencioniranje, proti kateremu se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi indijskih organov.
No evidence is available that the schemes will be discontinued or phased out in the near future.
Dokazov o tem, da se sheme v bližnji prihodnosti ne bodo nadaljevale ali da bodo postopno odpravljene, ni na voljo.
Since it has been demonstrated that the company is in receipt of much higher subsidisation than before and that it is likely to continue to receive subsidies of an amount higher than determined in the original investigation, it is concluded that the continuation of the existing measure is not sufficient to counteract the countervailable subsidy causing injury and that the level of the measure should therefore be amended to reflect the new findings.
Ker je bilo dokazano, da je družba deležna mnogo večjega subvencioniranja kot prej in da obstaja verjetnost, da bo še naprej prejemala zneske subvencij, ki so višji od ugotovljenih v prvotni preiskavi, se sklene, da nadaljevanje veljavnih ukrepov ne zadošča za preprečevanje subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi in ki povzročajo škodo, ter da je zaradi novih ugotovitev zato treba spremeniti raven ukrepov.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to the level of subsidisation of Jindal and the insufficiency of the existing measure to counteract the countervailable subsidies found, the countervailing duty with regard to Jindal should be amended in order to reflect the new subsidisation levels found.
Glede na sklepne ugotovitve v zvezi z nadaljevanjem subvencioniranja družbe Jindal in nezadostnosti veljavnih ukrepov za preprečevanje ugotovljenih subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, je treba spremeniti izravnalno dajatev v povezavi z družbo Jindal, da bo v skladu z novimi ugotovljenimi stopnjami subvencioniranja.
The amended countervailing duty should be established at the new rate of subsidisation found during the present review, as the injury margin calculated in the original investigation remains higher.
Spremenjeno izravnalno dajatev bi bilo treba določiti na novi stopnji subvencioniranja, ugotovljeni v tem pregledu, ker stopnja škode, izračunana v prvotni preiskavi, ostaja višja.
Pursuant to Article 24(1) of the basic Regulation and Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, no product shall be subject to both anti-dumping and countervailing duties for the purpose of dealing with one and the same situation arising from dumping or from export subsidisation.
V skladu s členom 24(1) osnovne uredbe in členom 14(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 za noben izdelek ne smejo veljati niti protidampinške niti izravnalne dajatve za reševanje istega položaja, ki je posledica dampinga ali izvoznega subvencioniranja.
However, since Jindal is subject to an anti-dumping duty of 0 % with regard to the product concerned, these provisions do not apply in the present case.
Vendar pa za družbo Jindal velja protidampinška dajatev v višini 0 % glede zadevnega izdelka, zato se v tem primeru te določbe ne uporabljajo.
Jindal, the GOI and the Community industry were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the amendment of the measures in force and had the opportunity to comment.
Družba Jindal, indijska vlada in industrija Skupnosti so bili seznanjeni z bistvenimi dejstvi in premisleki, na podlagi katerih naj bi se predlagala sprememba veljavnih ukrepov, ter so imeli možnost predložiti svoje pripombe.
The GOI did not submit any comments, and Jindal’s comments have been discussed in the recitals relevant to each specific comment above.
Indijska vlada ni predložila pripomb, pripombe družbe Jindal pa so se obravnavale zgoraj v uvodnih izjavah, ki ustrezajo vsaki posamezni pripombi.
The company, in its post-disclosure comments, requested the Commission to accept a price undertaking in order to offset the countervailable subsidies found herein.
Družba je v svojih pripombah po razkritju zahtevala, da Komisija sprejme cenovno zavezo za pokritje v tem primeru ugotovljenih subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi.
The Commission has examined the company’s proposal and considers that a price undertaking cannot be accepted.
Komisija je pretehtala predlog družbe in ugotovila, da ne more sprejeti cenovne zaveze.