natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In effect, there was sufficient prima facie evidence suggesting that Ningbo Ruyi fulfilled the criteria of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega so obstajali zadostni prima facie dokazi, da je družba Ningbo Ruyi izpolnila merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
In this context, the circumstances on the basis of which the existing measures were established were considered to have changed and these changes seemed to be of a lasting nature.
V tem okviru so se okoliščine, na podlagi katerih so bili uvedeni obstoječi ukrepi, spremenile, in zdi se, da so spremembe trajne.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the Commission published a notice (‘notice of initiation’) [3] and commenced an investigation on its own initiative, limited in scope to determine whether Ningbo Ruyi operates under market economy conditions and, if so, to determine whether its individual dumping margin and duty rate should be based on its own costs/domestic prices.
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom je Komisija ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe, in objavila obvestilo („obvestilo o začetku“) [3] ter na lastno pobudo začela preiskavo, omejeno po obsegu, da bi ugotovila, ali družba Ningbo Ruyi posluje pod pogoji tržnega gospodarstva in, če je temu tako, ugotovila ali naj se njeno individualno stopnjo dampinga in stopnjo dajatve določi na podlagi njenih lastnih stroškov/domačih cen.
The Commission officially advised Ningbo Ruyi and its related importer Jungheinrich AG, as well as the representatives of the exporting country and the Community industry of the initiation of the review.
Komisija je uradno obvestila družbo Ningbo Ruyi in njenega povezanega uvoznika Jungheinrich AG, kakor tudi predstavnike države izvoznice in industrijo Skupnosti o začetku pregleda.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing.
Zainteresiranim strankam je bila dana možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo Komisijo za zaslišanje.
The Commission also sent a claim form for market economy treatment (‘MET’) and a questionnaire to Ningbo Ruyi and received replies within the deadlines set for that purpose.
Komisija je družbi Ningbo Ruyi poslala tudi obrazec zahtevka za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo („TGO“) in vprašalnik; odgovore je prejela v rokih, določenih v ta namen.
The Commission sought all the information it deemed necessary for the determination of MET and dumping, analysed the information provided and carried out verification visits at the premises of the related companies:
Komisija je poiskala vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za določitev TGO in dampinga, opravila analizo predloženih informacij ter opravila preveritvene obiske v prostorih naslednjih povezanih družb:
Ruyi Industries (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. (‘Ruyi Hong Kong’), Hangzhou,
Ruyi Industries (Hongkong) Co., Ltd. („Ruyi Hongk Kong“), Hangzhou,
Jungheinrich Lift Trucks (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (‘Jungheinrich Shanghai’), Shanghai.
Jungheinrich Lift Trucks (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. („Jungheinrich Shanghai“), Šanghaj.
The investigation of dumping covered the period from 1 April 2005 to 31 March 2006 (‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava dampinga je zajemala obdobje od 1. aprila 2005 do 31. marca 2006 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The definition of the product concerned corresponds to the one that was used in the original investigation mentioned under recital (1).
Opredelitev zadevnega izdelka je v skladu z opredelitvijo, ki je bila uporabljena v prvotni preiskavi, navedeni v uvodni izjavi 1 zgoraj.
The product concerned is hand pallet trucks (‘HPT’), not self-propelled, used for the handling of materials normally placed on pallets, and their essential parts, i.e. chassis and hydraulics, originating in the PRC, currently classifiable within CN codes ex84279000 and ex84312000 (TARIC codes 8427900010 and 8431200010).
Zadevni izdelek so ročni vozički za premeščanje palet („RVP“) brez lastnega pogona, s katerimi se običajno prevažajo materiali na paletah, in njihovi osnovni deli, tj. šasije in hidravlike, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki so trenutno uvrščeni pod oznaki KN ex84279000 in ex84312000 (oznaki TARIC 8427900010 in 8431200010).
The current review has shown that the HPT produced in the PRC by Ningbo Ruyi and sold on the Chinese market have the same basic physical characteristics and the same uses as those exported to the Community.
Sedanji pregled je pokazal, da imajo RVP, ki jih družba Ningbo Ruyi proizvaja v LRK in so prodani na kitajskem trgu, enake osnovne fizikalne lastnosti in enako uporabo kot tisti, ki so izvoženi v Skupnost.
Therefore, these products are considered to be a like product within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se ti izdelki štejejo za podobne izdelke v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of the said Article for those producers which were found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, i.e. where it is shown that market economy conditions prevail in respect of the manufacture and sale of the like product.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe se v protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz LRK normalna vrednost določi v skladu z odstavki 1 do 6 navedenega člena za tiste proizvajalce, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, tj. kjer se izkaže, da v zvezi s proizvodnjo in prodajo podobnega izdelka veljajo pogoji tržnega gospodarstva.
firms have one clear set of basic accounting records which are independently audited in line with international accounting standards (‘IAS’) and are applied for all purposes,
podjetja imajo jasen seznam osnovnih računovodskih evidenc, ki se neodvisno pregledujejo v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi („MRS“) in se uporabljajo za vse namene,
Ningbo Ruyi requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Družba Ningbo Ruyi je zaprosila za TGO v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe.
It is the Community’s consistent practice to examine whether a group of related companies involved in the production and/or sale of the product concerned as a whole fulfils the conditions for MET.
Ustaljena praksa Skupnosti je, da ugotovi, ali skupina povezanih družb, vključenih v proizvodnjo in/ali prodajo zadevnega izdelka kot celota izpolnjuje pogoje za TGO.
According to Ningbo Ruyi, there was only one such related company in the PRC — Jungheinrich Shanghai.
Družba Ningbo Ruyi trdi, da obstaja samo ena povezana družba v LRK – Jungheinrich Shanghai.
Ningbo Ruyi replied to the MET claim form within the given deadline.
Družba Ningbo Ruyi je v roku poslal izpolnjen obrazec zahtevka za TGO.
In the course of the investigation, the Community industry claimed that there seemed to be various companies related to Ningbo Ruyi which were not duly disclosed by the company in the information submitted to the Commission, including in the audited financial statements.
Industrija Skupnosti je med preiskavo trdila, da se zdi, da je z družbo Ningbo Ruyi povezanih več družb, ki v informacijah in revidiranih računovodskih izkazih, predloženih Komisiji, niso bile razkrite.
According to the Community industry, the non-disclosure of related companies in financial statements is a breach of IAS 24 (Related Party Disclosures) and it requested the Commission to verify this issue.
Nerazkritje povezanih družb v računovodskih izkazih je kršitev MRS 24 (Razkrivanje povezanih strank), zato je industrija Skupnosti zaprosila Komisijo, da to zadevo preveri.
It was found during the verification visits that there were related companies which were not disclosed in the audited financial statements (breach of IAS 24) or in the replies to the MET claim form and to the questionnaire.
Med preveritvenimi obiski je bilo ugotovljeno, da obstajajo povezane družbe, ki v revidiranih računovodskih izkazih (kršitev MRS 24), ali v izpolnjenih obrazcih zahtevka za TGO in vprašalnikih niso bile razkrite.
In this respect, it is worth noting that both the MET claim form and the questionnaire requested Ningbo Ruyi to describe its worldwide corporate structure and affiliations, including parent companies, subsidiaries or other related companies, whether or not involved in the production and/or sale of the product concerned.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da tako obrazec zahtevka za TGO kot vprašalnik, od družbe Ningbo Ruyi zahtevata navedbo strukture svoje družbe in povezave po celem svetu, vključno z matičnimi podjetji, hčerinskimi družbami ali drugimi povezanimi družbami, ki so ali niso vključene v proizvodnjo in/ali prodajo zadevnega izdelka.
Furthermore, Ningbo Ruyi was requested to submit a MET claim form for each subsidiary or other related company in the PRC which was a producer and/or exporter of HPT and to provide details about all other related companies.
Poleg tega je bila družba Ningbo Ruyi zaprošena, da predloži obrazec zahtevka za TGO za vsako hčerinsko družbo v LRK, ki je bila proizvajalec in/ali izvoznik RVP ter zagotovi podrobnosti o vseh svojih ostalih povezanih družbah.
According to Ningbo Ruyi’s Auditor’s Report and Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2005 (‘Report 2005’) and the replies to the MET form and the questionnaire, Ningbo Ruyi only had three related companies in the RIP: Jungheinrich AG, Jungheinrich Shanghai and Ruyi Hong Kong.
Družba Ningbo Ruyi je imela v OPP v skladu z Revizijskim poročilom in računovodskimi izkazi za leto, ki se je končalo 31. decembra 2005 („Poročilo 2005“) in izpolnjeni obrazci zahtevka za TGO in vprašalnika samo tri povezane družbe: Jungheinrich AG, Jungheinrich Shanghai in Ruyi Hong Kong.
The investigation, however, showed that the Chinese shareholders of Ningbo Ruyi have also controlling shareholdings in Ningbo CFA Co., Ltd. (‘Ningbo CFA’) and Ningbo Free Trade Zone Ruyi International Trading Co., Ltd. (‘NFTZ’).
Preiskava pa je pokazala, da so kitajski delničarji družbe Ningbo Ruyi tudi delničarji z nadzornim deležem v družbah Ningbo CFA Co., Ltd. („Ningbo CFA“) in Ningbo Free Trade Zone Ruyi International Trading Co., Ltd. („NFTZ“).
There are also other companies owned by relatives of the Chinese shareholders of Ningbo Ruyi: CFA Tools Co., Ltd. (‘CFA Tools’), a company incorporated in Hong Kong, and Zhejiang Tianyou Import & Export Co., Ltd. (‘Tianyou’).
Sorodniki kitajskih delničarjev družbe Ningbo Ruyi so lastniki tudi družb: CFA Tools Co., Ltd. („CFA Tools“), registrirana v Hongkongu, in Zhejiang Tianyou Import & Export Co., Ltd. („Tianyou“).
All the abovementioned companies not disclosed by Ningbo Ruyi are thus related to Ningbo Ruyi for the purposes of the current review.
Vse zgoraj navedene družbe, ki jih družba Ningbo Ruyi ni razkrila, se zato v sedanjem pregledu štejejo za povezane z družbo Ningbo Ruyi.
Three of them were traders of HPT in the RIP and all have a business licence allowing them to trade HPT.
Tri so trgovale z RVP v OPP, vse pa imajo obrtno dovoljenje za trgovanje z RVP.
They seem to have exported mainly to countries outside the Community.
Zdi se, da so večinoma izvažale v države izven Skupnosti.
At least three quarters of the sales volumes reported by Ningbo Ruyi as domestic sales were in fact export sales channelled through non-disclosed domestic related customers and unrelated customers.
Vsaj tri četrtine prodaje, ki ga je družba Ningbo Ruyi prijavila kot domačo prodajo, je bil dejansko izvoz, izveden preko nerazkritih domačih povezanih in nepovezanih strank.
Finally, the nature of the transactions between Ningbo Ruyi and Ningbo Jinmao Import & Export Co., Ltd. (‘Ningbo Jinmao’), which was reported as a related company in the original investigation (Ningbo Ruyi sold its shareholding in November 2003), is an indication that the two companies still have close links in the HPT business.
Na tesno povezanost obeh družb v poslovanju s RVP kažejo transakcije med družbama Ningbo Ruyi in Ningbo Jinmao Import & Export Co., Ltd. („Ningbo Jinmao“), slednja je bila v prvotni preiskavi navedena kot povezana družba (družba Ningbo Ruyi je svoj delež prodala novembra 2003).
Ningbo Jinmao bought more than half of the HPT reported by Ningbo Ruyi as domestic sales in the RIP and then resold a significant quantity to NFTZ, which exported them.
Ningbo Jinmao je kupila več kot polovico RVP, ki jih je v OPP Ningbo Ruyi prijavila kot domačo prodajo, in jih potem v znatnih količinah preprodala družbi NFTZ, ki jih je izvozila.
NFTZ did not buy any HPT directly from Ningbo Ruyi.
Družba NFTZ ni neposredno kupila nobenega RVP od družbe Ningbo Ruyi.
The fact that Ningbo Jinmao is one of Ningbo Ruyi’s main customers and sells a large quantity of its purchases to NFTZ shows that Ningbo Ruyi knew or should have known that most sales to Ningbo Jinmao could not be domestic sales as NFTZ, a related company, was exporting the products bought by Ningbo Jinmao.
Družba Ningbo Jinmao je ena glavnih strank družbe Ningbo Ruyi, ki prodaja velik del svojih nakupov družbi NFTZ, kar kaže nato, da je družba Ningbo Ruyi vedela, ali morala vedeti, da večina prodaje družbi Ningbo Jinmao ne more biti domača prodaja, saj je povezana družba NFTZ izvažala večino izdelkov, kupljenih od družbe Ningbo Jinmao.
Some time after the on-the-spot verification visit, Ningbo Ruyi submitted some new information concerning the MET status of certain of these non-disclosed related companies arguing that a MET determination for the whole group could still be made.
Nekaj časa po preveritvenem obisku na kraju samem je družba Ningbo Ruyi predložila nekatere nove informacije glede TGO določenih nerazkritih povezanih družb in trdila, da je določitev TGO za vso skupino še vedno možna.
This was on the grounds that the non-disclosure was not intentional and because the involvement of these related parties with sales of the product under investigation was not significant.
To je utemeljila s tem, da nerazkritje ni bilo namerno, in ker vključenost teh povezanih družb v prodajo izdelka v preiskavi ni bila pomembna.
For the same reasons, Ningbo Ruyi’s partner, Jungheinrich AG, also argued that this new information should be considered and MET granted.
Zaradi istih razlogov je tudi družba Jungheinrich AG, ki je partner družbe Ningbo Ruyi, trdila, da je treba nove informacije upoštevati in odobriti TGO.
Whether or not there was any intent to impede the investigation by the timely non-disclosure of related parties, the fact is that questionnaire responses were substantially incomplete to a degree which made it impossible to verify the existence or otherwise of market economy conditions for the Ningbo Ruyi group during the verification visits which were carried out in the PRC.
Ne glede na to ali je bilo pravočasno nerazkritje povezanih strank namerno ali nenamerno oviranje preiskave, ostaja dejstvo, da so bili vprašalniki nepopolno izpolnjeni, zato med preveritvenimi obiski v LRK ni bilo mogoče preveriti obstoja pogojev tržnega gospodarstva za skupino družbe Ningbo Ruyi.
With no verification visits possible at the premises of the non-disclosed related parties, the extent to which the Ningbo Ruyi group was involved with HPT can only remain a matter of conjecture.
Ker preveritveni obiski v prostorih nerazkritih povezanih družb niso bili mogoči, je obseg vključenosti skupine družbe Ningbo Ruyi v RVP neznan.
In any event, Ningbo Ruyi’s failure to disclose in its financial statements all its related parties is a breach of IAS 24.
V vsakem primeru je nerazkritje povezanih strank v računovodskih izkazih družbe Ningbo Ruyi kršitev MRS 24.
The objective of IAS 24 is to ensure that an entity’s financial statements contain the disclosures necessary to draw attention to the possibility that its financial position and profit or loss may have been affected by the existence of related parties and by transactions and outstanding balances with such parties.
Cilj MRS 24 je zagotoviti, da računovodski izkazi podjetja vsebujejo razkritja, ki opozarjajo na možnost, da so na finančno stanje in poslovni izid podjetja vplivale povezane stranke, posli med njimi in nastale neporavnane obveznosti.
In the framework of an anti-dumping investigation, such disclosure is necessary to allow the institutions to examine whether a group of related companies as a whole fulfils the conditions for MET.
V okviru protidampinške preiskave je tako razkritje nujno, ker omogoča institucijam, da preverijo ali skupina povezanih družb kot celota izpolnjuje pogoje za TGO.
The breach of IAS 24 shows that the audit of Ningbo Ruyi’s financial statements was not carried out in accordance with IAS and casts doubts on the reliability of Ningbo Ruyi’s accounts.
Kršitev MRS 24 kaže, da revizija računovodskih izkazov družbe Ningbo Ruyi ni potekala v skladu z MRS in vzbuja dvom o zanesljivosti računovodskih izkazov družbe Ningbo Ruyi.
This would lead to the failure of Ningbo Ruyi to meet the second criterion laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
To bi pomenilo, da družba Ningbo Ruyi ne izpolnjuje drugega merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
Although the provisions of Article 18 of the basic Regulation concerning non-cooperation could apply in this review, it is noted that the Commission initiated this review on its own initiative because it had prima facie evidence that market economy conditions prevailed for Ningbo Ruyi, something that Ningbo Ruyi subsequently failed to demonstrate.
Čeprav bi se v tem pregledu lahko uporabile tudi določbe člena 18 osnovne uredbe o nesodelovanju, je treba opozoriti, da je Komisija začela to preiskavo na lastno pobudo, ker je imela zadostne prima facie dokaze, da za družbo Ningbo Ruyi sedaj veljajo pogoji tržnega gospodarstva, česar pa družba Ningbo Ruyi pozneje ni dokazala.
Consequently, it is considered that there is no need to invoke Article 18 of the basic Regulation, but suffices to terminate the review and maintain the existing measure in force.
Zato se šteje, da ni potrebe po uporabi člena 18 osnovne uredbe, vendar pa zadostuje za zaključek pregleda in ohranitev obstoječih ukrepov.
In the light of the results of the investigation, the review should be terminated without amending the level of the duty applicable to Ningbo Ruyi, which should be maintained at the level of the definitive anti-dumping duty rate established in the original investigation, i.e. 28,5 %.
Ob upoštevanju rezultatov preiskave je treba pregled zaključiti brez spremembe stopnje dajatve, ki se uporablja za družbo Ningbo Ruyi; in sicer jo je treba ohraniti na stopnji dokončne protidampinške dajatve, določene v prvotni preiskavi, tj. 28,5 %.
Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to terminate the present review and to maintain the existing anti-dumping duty on imports of HPT produced by Ningbo Ruyi.
Zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravalo zaključiti sedanji pregled in ohraniti obstoječe protidampinške dajatve na uvoz RVP, ki jih proizvaja družba Ningbo Ruyi.
The comments received were not of a nature to change the conclusions.
Komisija ni prejela nobenih pripomb, zaradi katerih bi se sklepi spremenili.
Following disclosure, the Community industry claimed that the non-cooperation provisions of the basic Regulation (Article 18) should be applied and Ningbo Ruyi should be penalised with the 46,7 % residual duty as a non-cooperating exporting producer.
Po razkritju je industrija Skupnosti trdila, da je treba uporabiti določbe o nesodelovanju osnovne uredbe (člen 18) ter družbo Ningbo Ruyi kot nesodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika kaznovati s preostalo dajatvijo v višini 46,7 %.
Jungheinrich AG and Ningbo Ruyi considered that Ningbo Ruyi’s failure to disclose all its related companies was minor and unintentional and had no impact on Ningbo Ruyi’s financial situation.
Po mnenju družb Jungheinrich AG in Ningbo Ruyi je bilo nerazkritje vseh povezanih družb družbe Ningbo Ruyi majhna in nenamerna kršitev, ki ni imela vpliva na finančno stanje družbe Ningbo Ruyi.
Therefore, Ningbo Ruyi should be granted MET or at least a revised lower individual duty rate.
Zato je treba družbi Ningbo Ruyi priznati TGO ali vsaj revidirano nižjo individualno stopnjo dajatve.
The failure to disclose all related companies, in particular since three out of the four non-disclosed related companies were involved in HPT business and the other one has a business licence that allows it to trade HPT, cannot be considered minor because it did not allow a determination of whether it has been shown that all MET criteria are met (and not only the second criterion concerning accounting) for all companies, in line with the Community’s standard practice.
Nerazkritje vseh nepovezanih družb, zlasti ker so bile tri od štirih povezanih družb vključene v poslovanje z RVP, ena pa ima obrtno dovoljenje za trgovanje z RVP, se ne more šteti za majhno kršitev, saj je onemogočalo določitev izpolnjevanja vseh meril TGO (ne samo drugega merila o računovodskih izkazih) za vse družbe, v skladu s standardno prakso Skupnosti.
Furthermore, whether the failure to disclose all these related companies was unintentional is irrelevant.
Poleg tega ni pomembno ali je bilo nerazkritje namerno ali ne.
The uncontested fact is that these related companies were not even disclosed in the financial statements of Ningbo Ruyi and this by itself showed that at least the second criterion of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation was not met.
Nesporno dejstvo je, da te družbe niso bile razkrite niti v računovodskih izkazih družbe Ningbo Ruyi, kar kaže, da ni bilo izpolnjeno najmanj drugo merilo člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
Consequently, the claim that the failure to disclose these related companies was minor, unintentional and without any impact cannot be accepted.
Posledično ni mogoče sprejeti trditve, da je bilo nerazkritje teh povezanih družb manjša nenamerna kršitev in brez vpliva.
Finally, as set out in recital (3), this review is limited in scope to determine whether Ningbo Ruyi operates under market economy conditions and, only if MET had been granted to Ningbo Ruyi, would a new dumping margin be calculated.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 3 zgoraj, je ta pregled po obsegu omejen na ugotavljanje ali družba Ningbo Ruyi posluje pod pogoji tržnega gospodarstva, nova stopnja dampinga bi se izračunala samo, če bi bila družbi odobrena TGO.
Thus, since MET is not granted, no new dumping margin, higher or lower than the existing one, can be established for Ningbo Ruyi through this review.
Družbi Ningbo Ruyi ni bila odobrena TGO, zato se zanjo pri tem pregledu ne določi nove stopnje dampinga, višje ali nižje od obstoječe.
This review should therefore be terminated without any amendment to Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005,
Pregled je zato treba zaključiti brez sprememb k Uredbi (ES) št. 1174/2005 –
The partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People’s Republic of China, initiated pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, is hereby terminated without amending the anti-dumping measures in force.
Delni vmesni pregled o protidampinških ukrepih za uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, začet v skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96, se s tem sklepom zaključi brez spremembe veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov.
OJ C 127, 31.5.2006, p. 2.
UL C 127, 31.5.2006, str. 2.
Council Regulation (EC) No 452/2007
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 452/2007
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of ironing boards originating in the People’s Republic of China and Ukraine
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in o dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz likalnih desk s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Ukrajine