natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the interest of transparency and in order to safeguard the ability of the competent authorities in the Member States to ensure the protection of individuals as regards the processing of their personal data, it is necessary to specify the exceptional circumstances in which the suspension of specific data flows may be justified, notwithstanding the finding of adequate protection.
Zaradi preglednosti in zato, da se zaščiti zmožnost pristojnih organov držav članic, da zagotovijo varstvo posameznikov v zvezi z obdelavo njihovih osebnih podatkov, je treba določiti izjemne okoliščine, v katerih se lahko upraviči začasna ustavitev pridobivanja in posredovanja specifičnih podatkov, ne glede na ugotovljeno ustrezno varstvo.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established under Article 31(1) of Directive 95/46/EC,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to odločbo, so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega v skladu s členom 31(1) Direktive 95/46/ES –
For the purposes of Article 25(2) of Directive 95/46/EC, the Bailiwick of Jersey is considered as providing an adequate level of protection for personal data transferred from the Community.
Za namene člena 25(2) Direktive 95/46/ES se za Bailiffovo okrožje Jersey šteje, da zagotavlja primerno stopnjo varstva osebnih podatkov, prenesenih iz Skupnosti.
This Decision concerns the adequacy of protection provided in Jersey with a view to meeting the requirements of Article 25(1) of Directive 95/46/EC and does not affect other conditions or restrictions implementing other provisions of that Directive that pertain to the processing of personal data within the Member States.
Ta odločba zadeva primernost varstva, zagotovljenega na otoku Jersey, z namenom izpolniti zahteve iz člena 25(1) Direktive 95/46/ES in ne vpliva na druge pogoje ali omejitve, s katerimi se izvajajo druge določbe navedene direktive, ki se nanašajo na obdelavo osebnih podatkov v državah članicah.
Without prejudice to their powers to take action to ensure compliance with national provisions adopted pursuant to provisions other than Article 25 of Directive 95/46/EC, the competent authorities in Member States may exercise their existing powers to suspend data flows to a recipient in Jersey in order to protect individuals with regard to the processing of their personal data in the following cases:
Brez vpliva na pooblastila za ukrepanje za zagotavljanje skladnosti z nacionalnimi predpisi, sprejetimi v skladu z določbami, drugimi kot v členu 25 Direktive 95/46/ES, lahko pristojni organi v državah članicah izvajajo svoja obstoječa pooblastila, da začasno ustavijo pretok podatkov k prejemniku na otoku Jersey z namenom zavarovati posameznike v zvezi z obdelavo njihovih osebnih podatkov v naslednjih primerih:
where a competent Jersey authority has determined that the recipient is in breach of the applicable standards of protection; or
če pristojni organ na otoku Jersey ugotovi, da prejemnik krši veljavne standarde varstva; ali
where there is a substantial likelihood that the standards of protection are being infringed, there are reasonable grounds for believing that the competent Jersey authority is not taking or will not take adequate and timely steps to settle the case at issue, the continuing transfer would create an imminent risk of grave harm to data subjects and the competent authorities in the Member State have made reasonable efforts in the circumstances to provide the party responsible for processing established in Jersey with notice and an opportunity to respond.
če obstaja precejšnja verjetnost, da so standardi varstva kršeni, če obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi za prepričanje, da pristojni organ na otoku Jersey ne ukrepa ali ne bo ukrepal primerno in pravočasno, da bi rešil zadevno vprašanje, če bi neprekinjen prenos povzročil neposredno tveganje za resno škodovanje osebam, na katere se podatki nanašajo, in če so si pristojni organi v državi članici v teh okoliščinah ustrezno prizadevali obvestiti organ, pristojen za obdelavo in s sedežem na otoku Jersey, in mu dati priložnost za odziv.
The suspension shall cease as soon as the standards of protection are assured and the competent authority of the Member States concerned is notified thereof.
Začasna ustavitev preneha takoj, ko so zagotovljeni standardi varstva, in so o tem obveščeni pristojni organi zadevnih držav članic.
Member States shall inform the Commission without delay when measures are adopted on the basis of Article 3.
Države članice obvestijo Komisijo takoj, ko so sprejeti ukrepi na podlagi člena 3.
The Member States and the Commission shall inform each other of cases where the action of bodies responsible for ensuring compliance with the standards of protection in Jersey fails to secure such compliance.
Države članice in Komisija se medsebojno obvestijo o primerih, kadar ukrepi organov, odgovornih za zagotavljanje skladnosti s standardi varstva na otoku Jersey, ne zagotavljajo take skladnosti.
If the information collected under Article 3 and under paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article provides evidence that any body responsible for ensuring compliance with the standards of protection in Jersey is not effectively fulfilling its role, the Commission shall inform the competent Jersey authority and, if necessary, present draft measures in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 31(2) of Directive 95/46/EC with a view to repealing or suspending this Decision or limiting its scope.
Če informacije, zbrane v skladu s členom 3 in odstavkoma 1 in 2 tega člena, dokazujejo, da organ, odgovoren za zagotavljanje skladnosti s standardi varstva na otoku Jersey, svoje vloge ne izpolnjuje učinkovito, Komisija obvesti pristojni organ na otoku Jersey in po potrebi predloži osnutke ukrepov v skladu s postopkom iz člena 31(2) Direktive 95/46/ES z namenom ukinitve ali začasne odložitve izvajanja te odločbe ali omejitve njenega področja uporabe.
The Commission shall monitor the functioning of this Decision and report any pertinent findings to the Committee established under Article 31 of Directive 95/46/EC, including any evidence that could affect the finding in Article 1 of this Decision, that protection in Jersey is adequate within the meaning of Article 25 of Directive 95/46/EC and any evidence that this Decision is being implemented in a discriminatory way.
Komisija spremlja učinkovanje te odločbe in odboru, ustanovljenemu v skladu s členom 31 Direktive 95/46/ES, poroča o morebitnih zadevnih ugotovitvah, vključno s kakršnimi koli dokazi, ki bi lahko vplivali na ugotovitev iz člena 1 te odločbe, da je varstvo na otoku Jersey primerno v smislu člena 25 Direktive 95/46/ES, in morebitnimi dokazi, da se ta odločba izvaja na diskriminatoren način.
Opinion No 8/2007 on the level of protection of personal data in Jersey, adopted on 9 October 2007, available at http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/workinggroup/wpdocs/2007_en.htm
Mnenje 8/2007 o ravni varstva osebnih podatkov na otoku Jersey, sprejeto 9. oktobra 2007, na voljo na naslovu: http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/workinggroup/wpdocs/2007_en.htm
These are the Data Protection (Corporate Finance Exemption) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, the Data Protection (Credit Reference Agency) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, the Data Protection (Fair Processing) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, the Data Protection (International Cooperation) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, the Data Protection (Notification) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, the Data Protection (Sensitive Personal Data) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, the Data Protection (Subject Access Exemptions) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, the Data Protection (Subject Access Miscellaneous) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, the Data Protection (Subject Access Modification — (Education) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, the Data Protection (Subject Access Modification — (Health) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, the Data Protection (Subject Access Modification — (Social Work) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, and the Data Protection (Transfer in Substantial Public Interest) (Jersey) Regulations 2005.
To so predpisi o varstvu podatkov Data Protection (Corporate Finance Exemption) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, Data Protection (Credit Reference Agency) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, Data Protection (Fair Processing) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, Data Protection (International Co-operation) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, Data Protection (Notification) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, Data Protection (Sensitive Personal Data) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, Data Protection (Subject Access Exemptions) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, Data Protection (Subject Access Miscellaneous) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, Data Protection (Subject Access Modification – (Education) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, Data Protection (Subject Access Modification – (Health) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, Data Protection (Subject Access Modification – (Social Work) (Jersey) Regulations 2005 in Data Protection (Transfer in Substantial Public Interest) (Jersey) Regulations 2005.
on the clearance of the accounts of certain paying agencies in Germany, Italy and Slovakia concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), Guarantee Section, for the 2006 financial year
o potrditvi obračunov nekaterih plačilnih agencij v Nemčiji, Italiji in na Slovaškem v zvezi z izdatki, financiranimi iz Jamstvenega oddelka Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (EKUJS), za proračunsko leto 2006
(notified under document number C(2008) 1709)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 1709)
(Only the German, Italian and Slovak texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v nemškem, italijanskem in slovaškem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
After consulting the Fund Committee,
po posvetovanju z odborom Sklada,
Commission Decision 2007/327/EC [3] cleared, for the 2006 financial year, the accounts of all the paying agencies except for the German paying agencies ‘Baden-Württemberg’ and ‘Bayern-Umwelt’, the Italian paying agencies ‘AGEA’ and ‘ARBEA’, the Portuguese paying agency ‘IFADAP’ and the Slovak paying agency ‘APA’.
Z Odločbo Komisije 2007/327/ES [3] so bili za proračunsko leto 2006 potrjeni obračuni vseh plačilnih agencij, razen nemških plačilnih agencij „Baden-Württemberg“ in „Bayern-Umwelt“, italijanskih plačilnih agencij „AGEA“ in „ARBEA“, portugalske plačilne agencije „IFADAP“ ter slovaške plačilne agencije „APA“.
Following the transmission of new information and after additional checks, the Commission can now take a decision on the integrality, accuracy and veracity of the accounts submitted by the German paying agency ‘Baden-Württemberg’, the Italian paying agency ‘AGEA’ and the Slovak paying agency ‘APA’.
Po prejemu novih podatkov in po dodatnih preverjanjih lahko Komisija zdaj sprejme odločitev o celovitosti, točnosti in verodostojnosti obračunov, ki so jih predložile nemška plačilna agencija „Baden-Württemberg“, italijanska plačilna agencija „AGEA“ in slovaška plačilna agencija „APA“.
The second subparagraph of Article 7(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 [4] lays down that the amounts that are recoverable from, or payable to, each Member State, in accordance with the accounts clearance decision referred to in the first subparagraph, shall be determined by deducting advances paid during the financial year in question, i.e. 2006, from expenditure recognised for that year in accordance with the first subparagraph.
Drugi pododstavek člena 7(1) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1663/95 [4] določa, da se zneski, ki se skladno z odločbo o potrditvi obračuna iz prvega pododstavka izterjajo od vsake države članice ali plačajo vsaki državi članici, določijo tako, da se predplačila, izplačana v zadevnem proračunskem letu, tj. v letu 2006, v skladu s prvim pododstavkom odštejejo od izdatkov, priznanih za isto leto.
Pursuant to Article 32(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, 50 % of the financial consequences of non-recovery of irregularities shall be borne by the Member State concerned and 50 % by the Community budget if the recovery of those irregularities has not taken place within four years of the primary administrative or judicial finding, or within eight years if the recovery is taken to the national courts.
V skladu s členom 32(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 zadevna država članica krije 50 % finančnih posledic zaradi neizvršene izterjave, ostalih 50 % pa je kritih iz proračuna Skupnosti, če se izterjava ni izvršila v štirih letih po datumu prve upravne ali sodne ugotovitve ali v osmih letih, če je izterjava v postopku pred nacionalnimi sodnimi organi.
Detailed rules on the application of the Member States’ reporting obligation of the amounts to be recovered are laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 of 21 June 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 as regards the accreditation of paying agencies and other bodies and the clearance of the accounts of the EAGF and of the EAFRD [5].
Podrobna pravila za izpolnjevanje obveznosti poročanja držav članic o zneskih, ki jih je treba izterjati, so določena v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 885/2006 z dne 21. junija 2006 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1290/2005 glede akreditacije plačilnih agencij in drugih organov ter potrditve obračunov Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada (EKJS) in Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) [5].
Annex III to the said Regulation provides the model tables 1 and 2 that have to be provided in 2007 by the Member States.
V Prilogi III k navedeni uredbi sta vzorčni preglednici 1 in 2, ki ju morajo države članice predložiti v letu 2007.
On the basis of the tables completed by the Member States, the Commission should decide on the financial consequences of non-recovery of irregularities older than four or eight years respectively.
Na podlagi preglednic, ki jih izpolnijo države članice, mora Komisija odločiti o finančnih posledicah zaradi neizvršenih izterjav, ki so starejše od štirih ali osmih let.
This decision is without prejudice to future conformity decisions pursuant to Article 32(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005.
Ta odločba ne posega v prihodnje odločbe o uskladitvi v skladu s členom 32(8) Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005.
Pursuant to Article 32(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, Member States may decide not to pursue recovery.
V skladu s členom 32(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 se lahko države članice odločijo, da ne bodo izvajale postopka izterjave.
If that decision has been taken within four years of the primary administrative or judicial finding, or within eight years if the recovery is taken to the national courts, 100 % of the financial consequences of the non-recovery should be borne by the Community budget.
Če je takšna odločitev sprejeta v štirih letih po prvi upravni ali sodni ugotovitvi ali v osmih letih, če je izterjava v postopku pred nacionalnimi sodnimi organi, se 100 % finančnih posledic zaradi neizvršene izterjave krije iz proračuna Skupnosti.
This decision is without prejudice to future conformity decisions pursuant to Article 32(8) of the said Regulation.
Ta odločba ne posega v prihodnje odločbe o uskladitvi v skladu s členom 32(8) navedene uredbe.
In clearing the accounts of the paying agencies concerned, the Commission must take account of the amounts already withheld from the Member States concerned on the basis of Decision 2007/327/EC.
Pri potrjevanju obračunov zadevnih plačilnih agencij mora Komisija upoštevati zneske, ki so bili zadevnim državam članicam že odtegnjeni na podlagi Odločbe 2007/327/ES.
In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1663/95, this Decision does not prejudice decisions taken subsequently by the Commission excluding from Community financing expenditure not effected in accordance with Community rules,
V skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 7(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1258/1999 in členom 7(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1663/95 ta odločba ne posega v poznejše odločitve Komisije, s katerimi se iz financiranja Skupnosti izločijo izdatki, ki niso bili izvedeni v skladu s pravili Skupnosti –
The accounts of the German paying agency ‘Baden-Württemberg’, the Italian paying agency ‘AGEA’ and the Slovak paying agency ‘APA’ concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), Guarantee Section, in respect of the 2006 financial year, are hereby cleared.
Potrdijo se obračuni nemške plačilne agencije „Baden-Württemberg“, italijanske plačilne agencije „AGEA“ in slovaške plačilne agencije „APA“ v zvezi z izdatki, financiranimi iz Jamstvenega oddelka Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (EKUJS), za proračunsko leto 2006.
The amounts which are recoverable from, or payable to, each Member State concerned pursuant to this Decision, including those resulting from the application of Article 32(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, are set out in the Annex.
Zneski, ki se izterjajo od vsake države članice ali izplačajo vsaki državi članici v skladu s to odločbo, vključno s tistimi, ki izhajajo iz uporabe člena 32(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005, so določeni v Prilogi I.
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany, the Italian Republic and the Slovak Republic.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Zvezno republiko Nemčijo, Italijansko republiko in Slovaško republiko.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1437/2007 (OJ L 322, 7.12.2007, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1437/2007 (UL L 322, 7.12.2007, str. 1).
OJ L 122, 11.5.2007, p. 51.
UL L 122, 11.5.2007, str. 51.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1233/2007 (OJ L 279, 23.10.2007, p. 10).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1233/2007 (UL L 279, 23.10.2007, str. 10).
For the calculation of the amount to be recovered from or paid to the Member State the amount taken into account is the total of the annual declaration for the expenditure cleared (column a), or the total of the monthly declarations for the expenditure disjoined (column b).
Pri izračunu zneska, ki ga je treba izterjati od države članice ali plačati državi članici, se v primeru potrjenih izdatkov (stolpec a) upošteva skupna vsota v letnem poročilu, v primeru izvzetih izdatkov (stolpec b) pa skupna vsota v mesečnih izjavah.
The reductions and suspensions are those taken into account in the advance system, to which are added in particular the corrections for the non-respect of payment deadlines established in August, September and October 2006.
Zmanjšanja in začasne ustavitve so tista, ki se upoštevajo pri sistemu predplačil, tem pa so dodani popravki za prekoračitev rokov za plačila, določenih v avgustu, septembru in oktobru 2006.
Nomenclature 2008: 05070106, 05021602, 6701, 6702, 6803.
Nomenklatura 2008: 05070106, 05021602, 6701, 6702, 6803.
2006 — Expenditure/assigned revenue for the paying agencies for which the accounts are
2006 – Izdatki/Namenski prejemki za plačilne agencije, katerih obračuni so
Reductions and suspensions for the whole financial year
Zmanjšanja in začasne ustavitve predplačil za celotno proračunsko leto
Reductions according to Article 32 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005
Zmanjšanja predplačil v skladu s členom 32 Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005
Total including reductions and suspensions
Skupaj, vključno z zmanjšanji in začasnimi ustavitvami predplačil
Advances paid to the Member State for the financial year
Predplačila, izplačana državi članici v proračunskem letu
Amount to be recovered from (–) or paid to (+) the Member State
Znesek, ki ga je treba izterjati od države članice (–) ali plačati državi članici (+)
Amount recovered from (–) or paid to (+) the Member State under Decision 2007/327/EC
Znesek, ki ga je treba izterjati od države članice (–) ali plačati državi članici (+) na podlagi Odločbe 2007/327/ES
Amount to be recovered from (–) or paid to (+) the Member State under this decision [1]
Znesek, ki ga je treba izterjati od države članice (–) ali plačati državi članici (+) na podlagi te odločbe [1]
= expenditure/assigned revenue declared in the annual declaration
= izdatki/namenski prejemki, navedeni v letnem poročilu
= total of the expenditure/assigned revenue in the monthly declarations
= celotni izdatki/namenski prejemki iz mesečnih izjav
Expenditure [2]
Izdatki [2]
Assigned revenue [2]
Namenski prejemki [2]
Sugar Fund
Sklad za prestrukturiranje industrije sladkorja
Article 32 (= e)
Člen 32 (= e)
Expenditure [3]
Izdatki [3]
Assigned revenue [3]
Namenski prejemki [3]
Applicable exchange rate: Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2006.
Veljavni menjalni tečaj: člen 7(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 883/2006.
If the assigned revenue part would be to the advantage of the Member State, it has to be declared under 05070106.
Če je del „namenski prejemki“ v korist državi članici, ga je treba prijaviti pod 05070106.
If the assigned revenue part of the Sugar Fund would be to the advantage of the Member State, it has to be declared under 05021602.
Če je del sklada za prestrukturiranje industrije sladkorja „namenski prejemki“ v korist državi članici, ga je treba prijaviti pod 05021602.
on the clearance of the accounts of the paying agencies of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia concerning expenditure in the field of rural development measures financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) for the 2007 financial year
o potrditvi obračunov plačilnih agencij Češke, Estonije, Cipra, Latvije, Litve, Madžarske, Malte, Poljske, Slovenije in Slovaške v zvezi z izdatki za ukrepe za razvoj podeželja, financiranimi iz Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada (EKJS) za proračunsko leto 2007
(notified under document number C(2008) 1710)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 1710)
(Only the Czech, Estonian, Greek, English, Latvian, Lithuanian, Hungarian, Polish, Slovak and Slovenian texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v češkem, estonskem, grškem, angleškem, latvijskem, litovskem, madžarskem, poljskem, slovaškem in slovenskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy [1], and in particular Articles 30 and 39 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1290/2005 z dne 21. junija 2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike [1] in zlasti členov 30 in 39 Uredbe,
After consulting the Committee on the Agricultural Funds,
po posvetovanju z Odborom za kmetijske sklade,
On the basis of the annual accounts submitted by the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia concerning expenditure in the field of rural development measures, accompanied by the information required, the accounts of the paying agencies referred to in Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 are to be cleared.
Potrditev obračunov plačilnih služb iz člena 6(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 je treba opraviti na podlagi letnih obračunov v zvezi z izdatki na področju ukrepov za razvoj podeželja, ki jih skupaj z zahtevanimi podatki predložijo Češka, Estonija, Ciper, Latvija, Litva, Madžarska, Malta, Poljska, Slovenija in Slovaška.
The clearance covers the completeness, accuracy and veracity of the accounts transmitted in the light of the reports established by the certification bodies.
Potrditev zajema popolnost, točnost in verodostojnost predloženih obračunov glede na poročila, ki jih sestavijo certifikacijski organi.
The time limits granted to the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia referred to in Article 7(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 [2] laying down detailed rules for the application of the procedure for the clearance of accounts of the EAGF for the submission to the Commission of the documents referred to in Article 8(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 and in Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 885/2006, have expired.
Roki iz člena 7(2) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 885/2006 [2] o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo postopka potrditve obračunov EKJS, ki so bili odobreni Češki, Estoniji, Cipru, Latviji, Litvi, Madžarski, Malti, Poljski, Sloveniji in Slovaški, da Komisiji predložijo dokumente iz člena 8(1)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 in člena 7(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 885/2006, so potekli.