natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
N&N research organisations should not undertake research aiming for non-therapeutic enhancement of human beings leading to addiction or solely for the illicit enhancement of the performance of the human body.
Organizacije, ki se ukvarjajo z raziskavami na področju N&N, ne smejo izvajati raziskav, ki so namenjene neterapevtskim izboljšavam človekovih sposobnosti, ki bi vodile k odvisnosti, ali izključno nedovoljenim izboljšavam sposobnosti človeškega telesa.
As long as risk assessment studies on long-term safety is not available, research involving deliberate intrusion of nano-objects into the human body, their inclusion in food (especially in food for babies), feed, toys, cosmetics and other products that may lead to exposure to humans and the environment, should be avoided.
Dokler ne bo na voljo študij o oceni tveganja glede dolgoročne varnosti se je treba izogibati izvajanju raziskav, ki vključujejo namerno vnašanje nanopredmetov v človeško telo, v hrano (zlasti v hrano za dojenčke), krmo, igrače, kozmetične izdelke in druge proizvode, zaradi katerih bi se lahko pojavilo tveganje za ljudi in okolje.
Due respect for precaution
Ustrezno upoštevanje previdnostnega načela
Given the deficit of knowledge of the environmental and health impacts of nano-objects, Member States should apply the precautionary principle in order to protect not only researchers, who will be the first to be in contact with nano-objects, but also professionals, consumers, citizens and the environment in the course of N&N research activities.
Ker je znanje o učinkih nanopredmetov na okolje in zdravje še vedno pomanjkljivo, morajo države članice uporabiti previdnostno načelo, da se v teku raziskovalnih dejavnosti na področju N&N zaščiti ne le raziskovalce, ki bodo prvi prišli v stik z nanopredmeti, temveč tudi strokovnjake, potrošnike, državljane in okolje.
Students, researchers and research organisations involved in N&N research should take specific health, safety and environmental measures adapted to the particularities of the nano-objects manipulated.
Študentje, raziskovalci in organizacije, ki sodelujejo pri raziskavah na področju N&N, morajo sprejeti posebne zdravstvene, varnostne in okoljske ukrepe, prilagojene posebnostim nanopredmetov, s katerimi so v stiku.
Specific guidelines on the prevention of pathologies induced by nano-objects should be developed in line with the Community Strategy 2007-14 on Health and Safety at Work [3].4.2.2. N&N research organisations should apply existing good practices in terms of classification and labelling.
V skladu s strategijo Skupnosti 2007–2012 za zdravje in varnost pri delu [3] je treba oblikovati posebne smernice za preprečevanje bolezni, do katerih pride zaradi nanopredmetov.4.2.2 Organizacije, ki se ukvarjajo z raziskavami na področju N&N, morajo za klasifikacijo in označevanje uporabiti obstoječe dobre prakse.
In addition, as nano-objects might present specific properties due to their size, they should undertake research on systems (including e.g. the development of specific pictograms) aiming to inform researchers and more generally people likely to come into contact with nano-objects in research premises (e.g. security and emergency staff) so that they may take the necessary and appropriate protection measures in the course of their duties.
Ker imajo nanopredmeti zaradi svoje velikosti lahko posebne lastnosti, morajo navedene organizacije poleg tega proučiti sisteme (vključno z oblikovanjem posebnih piktogramov), namenjene informiranju raziskovalcev in bolj splošno ljudi, ki bi lahko prišli v stik z nanopredmeti v raziskovalnih prostorih (npr. varnostno osebje in osebje služb za nujno pomoč), da bi ti pri svojem delu lahko sprejeli potrebne in ustrezne varstvene ukrepe.
Public and private N&N research funding bodies should request that a risk assessment be presented along with each submission of a proposal for funding for N&N research.
Javni in zasebni organi, pristojni za financiranje raziskav na področju N&N, morajo zahtevati predložitev ocene tveganja ob vsaki predložitvi predloga za financiranje raziskav na področju N&N.
N&N research funding bodies’ programmes should include monitoring of the potential social, environmental and human health impacts of N&N over a relevant period of time.
Programi organov, pristojnih za financiranje raziskav na področju N&N, morajo vključevati spremljanje morebitnih učinkov N&N na družbo, okolje in človekovo zdravje, in sicer v ustreznem obdobju.
Application of the precautionary principle should include reducing the gaps in scientific knowledge, and therefore undertaking further actions in research and development such as the following:
Uporaba previdnostnega načela mora vključevati zmanjševanje vrzeli v znanstvenem znanju ter posledično sprejemanje nadaljnjih ukrepov na področju raziskav in razvoja, kot so na primer:
Research funding bodies should devote an appropriate part of N&N research to understanding the potential risks, notably to the environment and human health, induced by nano-objects, encompassing their whole life cycle, from their creation up to their end of life, including recycling.
Organi, pristojni za financiranje raziskav, morajo nameniti ustrezen del raziskav na področju N&N razumevanju morebitnih tveganj, zlasti za okolje in človekovo zdravje, ki jih povzročijo nanopredmeti, in pri tem upoštevati njihov celotni življenjski cikel, od njihovega nastanka do konca njihove življenjske dobe, vključno z recikliranjem.
N&N research organisations and researchers should launch and coordinate specific N&N research activities in order to gain a better understanding of fundamental biological processes involved in the toxicology and ecotoxicology of nano-objects man-made or naturally occurring.
Organizacije in raziskovalci, ki se ukvarjajo z raziskavami na področju N&N, morajo začeti izvajati in usklajevati posebne raziskovalne dejavnosti na področju N&N, da bi dosegli boljše razumevanje osnovnih bioloških procesov v toksikologiji in ekotoksikologiji nanopredmetov, ki jih je ustvaril človek ali so nastali naravno.
They should widely publicise, when duly validated, data and findings on their biological effects, be they positive, negative or null.
Podatke in odkritja o njihovih bioloških učinkih bi morali, ne glede na to, ali so pozitivni, negativni ali jih ni, v širokem obsegu objaviti, potem ko bodo ustrezno potrjeni.
N&N research funding bodies should launch and coordinate specific research activities in order to gain a better understanding of ethical, legal and societal impacts of the new fields opened by N&N.
Organi, pristojni za financiranje raziskav na področju N&N, morajo začeti izvajati in usklajevati posebne raziskovalne dejavnosti, da bi dosegli boljše razumevanje etičnih, pravnih in družbenih učinkov novih področij, ki so se pojavila zaradi N&N.
Information and communication technologies and biotechnology should receive particular attention as well as the convergence between these fields and cognitive sciences and N&N.
Posebno pozornost je treba posvetiti informacijski in komunikacijski tehnologiji, biotehnologiji ter zbliževanju teh področij s kognitivnimi znanostmi in N&N.
Wide dissemination and monitoring of the Code of Conduct
Obsežno razširjanje in spremljanje kodeksa ravnanja
Member States should support the wide dissemination of this Code of Conduct, notably through national and regional public research funding bodies.
Države članice morajo podpirati obsežno razširjanje tega kodeksa ravnanja, zlasti prek nacionalnih in regionalnih javnih organov, pristojnih za financiranje raziskav.
In addition to the existence of this Code of Conduct, N&N research funding bodies should make sure that N&N researchers are aware of all relevant legislation, as well as ethical and social frameworks.
Organi, pristojni za financiranje raziskav na področju N&N, morajo zagotoviti, da so raziskovalci s področja N&N obveščeni ne samo o obstoju tega kodeksa ravnanja, temveč tudi o obstoju vse zadevne zakonodaje ter etičnih in družbenih okvirov.
As the application of the Code of Conduct should be monitored across the Community, Member States should cooperate with the Commission in order to devise adequate measures to carry out such monitoring at national level and guarantee synergies with other Member States.
Ker je treba uporabo kodeksa ravnanja spremljati v celotni Skupnosti, morajo države članice sodelovati s Komisijo pri oblikovanju ustreznih ukrepov za izvajanje takšnega spremljanja na nacionalni ravni ter zagotavljanje sinergij z drugimi državami članicami.
The United Nations Millennium Declaration, General Assembly Resolution 55/2, 8.9.2000.
Milenijska deklaracija Združenih narodov, resolucija Generalne skupščine Združenih narodov št. 55/2, 8.9.2000.
Directive 2004/9/EC and Directive 2004/10/EC.
Direktivi 2004/9/ES in 2004/10/ES.
on reproducing the text of Article 20 TEC in passports
o ponatisu besedila člena 20 Pogodbe ES v potnih listih
(notified under document number C(2007) 5841)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 5841)
Article 20 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (hereinafter Article 20 TEC) entitles Union citizens located in a third country in which their own Member State is not represented to protection by the diplomatic and consular authorities of any other Member State represented, on the same conditions as the nationals of that State.
Člen 20 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti (v nadaljnjem besedilu „člen 20 Pogodbe ES“) priznava vsakemu državljanu Unije, ki se nahaja na ozemlju tretje države, v kateri država članica, katere državljan je, nima predstavništva, pravico do zaščite diplomatskih in konzularnih organov katere koli države članice pod enakimi pogoji, kakršni veljajo za državljane tiste države.
This right is also enshrined in Article 46 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Ta pravica je vsebovana tudi v členu 46 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
A Eurobarometer survey published in July 2006 revealed that the majority of Union citizens are not aware of Article 20 TEC and its implications.
Raziskava Eurobarometra, objavljena julija 2006, je pokazala, da večina državljanov Unije ne pozna člena 20 Pogodbe ES in njegovih posledic.
Only 23 % of the persons interviewed claimed to be familiar with the possibilities offered by Article 20 TEC.
Samo 23 % vprašanih je trdilo, da so seznanjeni z možnostmi, ki jih ponuja člen 20 Pogodbe ES.
It also emerged that half of the Union citizens expect to travel to a third country within the next three years.
Pokazalo se je tudi, da namerava polovica državljanov Unije v naslednjih treh letih potovati v tretjo državo.
The suggestion to reproduce Article 20 TEC in passports to inform citizens of their rights was invoked in the report of 9 May 2006 of Mr Barnier ‘For a European civil protection force: Europe aid’.
Predlog za ponatis člena 20 Pogodbe ES v potne liste, da bodo državljani obveščeni o svojih pravicah, je bil sprožen v poročilu g. Barniera z dne 9. maja 2006„Za evropsko enoto civilne zaščite: Europe aid“.
On 15 June 2006, the Council Presidency invited Member States to consider the possibility of reproducing the wording of Article 20 TEC in passports to ensure that Union citizens are well informed of their rights [1].
Predsedstvo Sveta je 15. junija 2006 države članice pozvalo, naj razmislijo o možnosti ponatisa besedila člena 20 Pogodbe ES v potnih listih, da bodo državljani Unije seznanjeni s svojimi pravicami [1].
The Commission adopted a Green Paper on diplomatic and consular protection of Union citizens in third countries [2] on 28 November 2006, which proposed several possible actions to strengthen the protection of Union citizens.
Komisija je 28. novembra 2006 sprejela Zeleno knjigo o diplomatski in konzularni zaščiti državljanov Unije v tretjih državah [2] v kateri je bilo predlaganih več možnih ukrepov za okrepitev zaščite državljanov Unije.
As an effective way of reminding citizens of their rights, it was suggested to recommend Member States to print Article 20 TEC in passports.
Kot učinkovit način za opozarjanje državljanov na njihove pravice je bilo državam članicam priporočeno, da natisnejo člen 20 Pogodbe ES v potne liste.
This proposal received wide support from Member States, civil society, citizens and other European institutions [3] [4].
Države članice, civilna družba, državljani in druge evropske institucije [3] [4] so ta predlog široko podprle.
To inform citizens of their right to protection by diplomatic and consular authorities under Article 20 TEC, it was also suggested to create an EU website concerning this right and to include a reference to the website in national passports.
Da bi državljane seznanili z njihovo pravico do zaščite s strani diplomatskih in konzularnih organov v skladu s členom 20 Pogodbe ES, je bila predlagana tudi vzpostavitev spletne strani EU o tej pravici in vključitev reference na to spletno stran v nacionalne potne liste.
The issuing of passports falls under Member States’ competence.
Izdajanje potnih listov je v pristojnosti držav članic.
A uniform format for passports was introduced by a Resolution of the representatives of the Governments of the Member States on 23 June 1981 [5].
Enotna oblika potnih listov je bila uvedena z Resolucijo predstavnikov vlad držav članic dne 23. junija 1981 [5].
In addition, measures have been adopted at Community level regarding the security standards for passports.
Poleg tega so bili na ravni Skupnosti sprejeti ukrepi glede varnostnih standardov za potne liste.
Minimum security standards for passports were introduced by a Resolution of the representatives of the Governments of the Member States on 17 October 2000 in order to combat forgery [6].
Z Resolucijo predstavnikov vlad držav članic so bili 17. oktobra 2000 uvedeni minimalni standardi za potne liste zaradi boja proti goljufiji [6].
A Council Regulation was adopted on 13 December 2004 requiring Member States to introduce biometric identifiers in passports by 28 August 2006 and to store additional data in passports by 28 June 2007 [7].
Uredba Sveta, ki je bila sprejeta 13. decembra 2004, je od držav članic zahtevala uvedbo biometričnih identifikatorjev v potne liste do 28. avgusta 2006 in shranjevanje dodatnih podatkov v potnih listih do 28. junija 2007 [7].
Article 20 TEC should be reproduced in the official language(s) of the Member State issuing the passport.
Člen 20 Pogodbe ES mora biti ponatisnjen v uradnem(-ih) jeziku(-ih) države članice, ki izda potni list.
It would be sufficient to reproduce the wording of the first sentence of Article 20 TEC.
Zadoščal bi ponatis besedila prvega stavka člena 20 Pogodbe ES.
The second sentence refers to Member States’ duty to engage in international negotiations to secure protection and is not directly relevant for citizens.
Drugi stavek se nanaša na dolžnost držav članic, da se začnejo mednarodna pogajanja za zagotovitev zaščite, in državljanov ne zadeva neposredno.
The Commission intends to create a website dedicated to consular protection to publish practical information, e.g. updated contact details of Member States’ representations in third countries.
Komisija namerava vzpostaviti spletno stran, namenjeno konzularni zaščiti, na kateri bodo objavljene praktične informacije, npr. posodobljeni kontaktni podatki predstavništev držav članic v tretjih državah.
It would be useful to include a reference to this website in national passports together with Article 20 TEC as a single common access point to information on this right.
Koristno bi bilo, če bi vključili referenco na to spletno stran v nacionalne potne liste skupaj s členom 20 Pogodbe ES kot enotno skupno točko dostopa do informacij o tej pravici.
To minimise the administrative burden of the Member States, it would be appropriate to recommend Member States to print Article 20 TEC in new passports issued after 1 July 2009.
Za zmanjšanje upravne obremenitve držav članic bi bilo primerno državam članicam priporočiti, da v nove potne liste, izdane po 1. juliju 2009, natisnejo člen 20 Pogodbe ES.
In order to inform citizens whose passports are issued without a reference to Article 20 TEC, it should be recommended to affix a sticker on the outside rear cover.
Za obveščanje državljanov, katerih potni listi so bili izdani brez sklica na člen 20 Pogodbe ES, je treba priporočiti, da se na zunanjo stran zadnje platnice nalepi nalepka.
To reproduce the wording of Article 20 TEC in passports would significantly enhance citizens’ awareness of the right to protection by diplomatic and consular authorities and entail limited costs for the Member States,
Ponatis besedila člena 20 Pogodbe ES v potnih listih bi znatno okrepil ozaveščenost državljanov glede pravice do zaščite s strani diplomatskih in konzularnih organov ter za države članice pomenil zanemarljive stroške –
Member States are invited to reproduce the first sentence of Article 20 of the Treaty establishing the European Community and a reference to an EU website (http://ec.europa.eu/consularprotection) in passports issued after 1 July 2009.
da države članice ponatisnejo prvi stavek člena 20 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti ter sklic na spletno stran EU (http://ec.europa.eu/consularprotection) v potne liste, izdane po 1. juliju 2009;
Member States are invited to make available a sticker with the information referred to in point 1 to holders of passports issued before 1 July 2009.
da države članice zagotovijo nalepko z informacijami iz točke 1 za imetnike potnih listov, izdanih pred 1. julijem 2009;
Member States are invited to inform the Commission 18 months from the publication of this Recommendation in the Official Journal of the European Union of action taken in response to this Recommendation.
da države članice obvestijo Komisijo o ukrepih, sprejetih glede tega Priporočila, v 18 mesecev po njegovi objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
‘Reinforcing the European Union’s emergency and crisis response capacities’, Document of the Council 10551/06 of 15.6.2006.
„Okrepitev zmogljivosti Evropske unije za odzivanje na izredne dogodke in krize“, dokument Sveta št. 10551/06 z dne 15.6.2006.
COM(2006) 712.
COM(2006) 712 konč.
Opinion of the European Parliament: A6-0454/2007.
Mnenje Evropskega parlamenta: A6-0454/2007.
Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee: SOC/262 (CESE 425/2007).
Mnenje Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora: SOC/262 (CESE 425/2007).
OL C 241, 19.9.1981, p. 1.
UL C 241, 19.9.1981, str. 1.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 of 13 December 2004 on standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by Member States (OJ L 385, 29.12.2004, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2252/2004 z dne 13. decembra 2004 o standardih za varnostne značilnosti in biometrične podatke v potnih listih in potovalnih dokumentih, ki jih izdajo države članice (UL L 385, 29.12.2004, str. 1).
on external quality assurance for statutory auditors and audit firms auditing public interest entities
o zunanjem zagotavljanju kakovosti za zakonite revizorje in revizijska podjetja, ki opravljajo revizije subjektov javnega interesa
(notified under document number C(2008) 1721)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 1721)
External quality assurance for the statutory audit is fundamental for high audit quality.
Zunanje zagotavljanje kakovosti obvezne revizije je bistvenega pomena za visoko kakovost revizij.
It adds credibility to published financial information and provides better protection of shareholders, investors, creditors and other interested parties.
Prispeva k verodostojnosti objavljenih finančnih informacij in zagotavlja boljšo zaščito delničarjev, investitorjev, upnikov in drugih zainteresiranih strani.
Any external quality assurance system should therefore be objective and independent from the auditing profession.
Vsak sistem zunanjega zagotavljanja kakovosti mora zato biti nepristranski in neodvisen od revizijske stroke.
Articles 29 and 43 of Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC [1] establishes high-level criteria for quality assurance systems for all statutory auditors and audit firms.
Člena 29 in 43 Direktive 2006/43/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. maja 2006 o obveznih revizijah za letne in konsolidirane računovodske izkaze, spremembi Direktiv Sveta 78/660/EGS in 83/349/EGS ter razveljavitvi Direktive 84/253/EGS [1] določata visoko raven meril za sisteme zagotavljanja kakovosti za vse zakonite revizorje in revizijska podjetja.
It incorporates some of the ideas contained in Commission Recommendation 2001/256/EC of 15 November 2000 on quality assurance for the statutory audit in the European Union: minimum requirements [2].
Vključujeta nekatere ideje iz Priporočila Komisije 2001/256/ES z dne 15. novembra 2000 o zagotavljanju kakovosti obvezne revizije v Evropski uniji: minimalne zahteve [2].
However, parts of that Recommendation, which are related to statutory audit of public interest entities, have been overtaken by recent international developments and tendencies to introduce, for such audits, external quality assurance systems, which are managed independently from the auditing profession and where quality assurance reviews are performed by persons other than practising auditors.
Vendar pa sta dele priporočila, ki so povezani z obvezno revizijo subjektov javnega interesa, prehitela nedavni mednarodni razvoj in nagnjenost k uvedbi sistemov zunanjega zagotavljanja kakovosti za takšne revizije, ki se upravljajo neodvisno od revizijske stroke, in kjer preglede zagotavljanja kakovosti opravljajo osebe, ki niso zaposlene kot revizorji.
The criteria laid down in Directive 2006/43/EC still allow for considerable differences in the way external quality assurance systems for statutory auditors and audit firms are currently organised in Member States.
Merila iz Direktive 2006/43/ES še vedno dovoljujejo precejšnje razlike v načinih trenutnega organiziranja sistemov zunanjega zagotavljanja kakovosti za zakonite revizorje in revizijska podjetja v državah članicah.
It should be avoided that the interested parties perceive audit quality of statutory auditors and audit firms in Member States differently, in particular with respect to Article 34 of Directive 2006/43/EC.
Preprečiti je treba, da bi zainteresirane strani različno razumele kakovost revizij zakonitih revizorjev in revizijskih podjetij v državah članicah, zlasti v zvezi s členom 34 Direktive 2006/43/ES.
Directive 2006/43/EC also encourages public oversight systems of Member States to find a co-ordinated approach to the carrying-out of quality assurance reviews.
Direktiva 2006/43/ES spodbuja tudi sisteme javnega nadzora držav članic, da poiščejo usklajen pristop k opravljanju pregledov zagotavljanja kakovosti.
Co-operation between Member States is a priority with regard to audits of public interest entities.
Sodelovanje med državami članicami je prednostna naloga v zvezi z revizijami subjektov javnega interesa.
Further guidance should be given to quality assurance systems for statutory auditors and audit firms performing audit in such entities.
Sistemom zagotavljanja kakovosti za zakonite revizorje in revizijska podjetja, ki izvajajo revizije v takšnih subjektih, je treba dati nadaljnje smernice.
Therefore, it is appropriate to provide for a new Recommendation which is more in line with the current state of affairs than Recommendation 2001/256/EC and which takes into account new international trends as well as specific needs of the Member States.
Zato je primerno pripraviti novo priporočilo, ki je skladnejše s trenutnim stanjem kot Priporočilo 2001/256/ES ter upošteva nove mednarodne trende in posebne potrebe držav članic.
However, there is no need to provide detailed guidance with regard to the quality assurance systems for statutory auditors and audit firms auditing entities other than public interest entities.
Vendar ni potrebno zagotoviti podrobnih navodil za sisteme zagotavljanja kakovosti za zakonite revizorje in revizijska podjetja, ki opravljajo revizije subjektov, ki niso subjekti javnega interesa.