natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In Annex 1 to the R&D framework of 1986, basic industrial research is defined as ‘original theoretical or experimental work whose objective is to achieve new or better understanding of the laws of science and engineering as they might apply to an industrial sector or the activities of a particular undertaking’.
V skladu s Prilogo 1 k okviru Skupnosti za R&R iz leta 1986 je „industrijsko temeljno raziskovanje opredeljeno kot samostojno teoretično ali eksperimentalno delo, katerega cilj je pridobiti novo ali boljše razumevanje zakonov znanosti in tehnike, vključno z njihovo uporabo v industrijskem sektorju ali pri dejavnostih določenega podjetja.“
In Annex 1 to the R&D framework of 1996, industrial research is defined as ‘planned research of critical investigation aimed at the acquisition of new knowledge, the objective being that such knowledge may be useful in developing new products, processes or services or in bringing about a significant improvement in existing products, processes or services’.
Po Prilogi 1 k okviru Skupnosti za R&R iz leta 1996 je industrijsko raziskovanje opredeljeno kot načrtno raziskovanje ali kritično raziskovanje za pridobivanje novih znanj, s ciljem uporabe teh znanj za razvoj novih izdelkov, postopkov in storitev ali za uresničevanje znatnih izboljšav obstoječih izdelkov, postopkov ali storitev.
In Annex 1 to the R&D framework of 1996, precompetitive development is defined as ‘the shaping of the results of industrial research into a plan, arrangement or design for new, altered or improved products, processes or services, whether they are intended to be sold or used, including the creation of an initial prototype which could not be used commercially.
Po Prilogi 1 k okviru Skupnosti za R&R iz leta 1996 predkonkurenčni razvoj zajema pretvorbo znanj, pridobljenih pri industrijskem raziskovanju, v načrt, shemo ali osnutek za nove, spremenjene ali izboljšane izdelke, postopke ali storitve, ne glede na to, ali so namenjeni za prodajo ali uporabo, vključno z izdelavo prvega prototipa, ki ni namenjen za komercialno uporabo.
This may also include the conceptual formulation and design of other products, processes or services and initial demonstration projects or pilot projects, provided that such projects cannot be converted or used for industrial applications or commercial exploitation’.
Poleg tega lahko vključuje tudi zasnovno obliko in načrt drugih izdelkov, postopkov ali storitev ter začetno predstavitev ali pilotne projekte, če teh projektov ni mogoče pretvoriti ali uporabiti v industrijske ali tržne namene
After it became clear that the assets of SLT would be sold outside Bavaria, one of the formal preconditions for the grants was no longer fulfilled.
Ko je postalo znano, da bo premoženje SLT prodano izven Bavarske, eden od formalnih predpogojev za pomoč ni bil več izpolnjen.
In September 2000, the first two loans were prolonged until 30 September 2002, i.e. by two further years, and the interest rates were increased for loan 1 to [...] %, and for loan 2 to [...] %.
Septembra 2000 sta bili prvi posojili podaljšani do 30. septembra 2002, torej za nadaljnji dve leti, obrestna mera pa je bila zvišana: za posojilo 1 na […] % in za posojilo 2 na […] %.
In December 2000, loan 3 was also prolonged until 30 September 2002 and the interest rate was increased to [...] %.
Decembra 2000 je bilo podaljšano tudi posojilo 3, in sicer do 30. septembra 2002, obrestna mera pa je bila zvišana na [...] %.
‘However, in exceptional cases where such research is carried out in or for particular firms, the Commission cannot rule out the possibility that the aid does fall within Article 92(1) [now 87(1)]’. This is not such a case.
„Vendar pa Komisija izjemoma v primerih, ko je to raziskovanje izvedeno pri ali v korist določenih podjetij, ne more izključiti možnosti, da spada pomoč v področje uporabe člena 92(1) [zdaj 87(1)].“ Temu v tem primeru ni tako.
Lehman Brothers, a private investment bank, held 26,6 %, Gebr. Schneider GmbH & Co. KG 14,6 % and other private investors 23,2 %.
Lehman Brothers, zasebna investicijska banka, je imela 26,6 % delež, Gebrüder Schneider GmbH & Co. KG 14,6 % in ostali zasebni vlagatelji 23,2 %.
on State aid granted by Germany for the acquisition of shares in winegrowers' cooperatives
o državni pomoči, ki jo je Nemčija odobrila za nakup deležev vinarskih zadrug
(notified under document number C(2006) 2070)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 2070)
Having given interested parties notice to submit their comments pursuant to that Article, and having regard to those comments,
po pozivu zainteresiranim stranem, naj vložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z zgoraj navedenim členom, ter ob upoštevanju njihovih pripomb,
The measure was notified by letter of 19 April 2001 in response to a written inquiry from the Commission.
Ukrep je bil prijavljen Komisiji na podlagi pisnega zahtevka služb Komisije v dopisu z dne 19. aprila 2001.
Since the measure had already been implemented, the record of the aid was transferred to the register of non-notified state aid (aid No NN 32/01).
Ker je bil ukrep že izveden, je bila pomoč prenesena na seznam neprijavljenih pomoči (št. pomoči NN 32/01).
Additional information was submitted by letters of: 13 February 2002, registered as received on 18 February 2002; 5 July 2002, registered as received on 9 July 2002; and 5 December 2002, registered as received on 10 December 2002.
Dodatni podatki so bili posredovani v dopisu z dne 13. februarja 2002, ki ga je Komisija prejela 18. februarja 2002, v dopisu z dne 5. julija 2002, ki ga je Komisija prejela 9. julija 2002, in v dopisu z dne 5. decembra 2002, ki ga je Komisija prejela 10. decembra 2002.
A meeting to discuss the aid took place at the Directorate-General for Agriculture on 25 June 2002.
Poleg tega je 25. junija 2002 o tem potekala razprava v službenih prostorih Generalnega direktorata za kmetijstvo.
By letter SG (2003) D/232035 of 2 October 2003 the Commission informed Germany of its decision to initiate the procedure under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of this state aid measure (aid No C 60/2003).
Komisija je v dopisu z dne 2. oktobra 2003 (SG(2003) D/232035) Nemčijo obvestila o svojem sklepu, da bo zaradi tega ukrepa sprožila postopek na podlagi člena 88(2) Pogodbe ES (št. pomoči C 60/2003).
On 6 November 2003 the Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union and interested parties were invited to submit their comments.
Sklep Komisije, da sproži postopek, je bil objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije. Komisija je zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj predložijo pripombe glede zadevne pomoči.
The Commission received comments from interested parties and from the regional authorities granting the aid by letters of 18 November 2003, registered as received on 25 November 2003; 23 December 2003, registered as received on 5 January 2004; and 12 February 2004, registered as received on 17 February 2004.
Komisija je v dopisu z dne 18. novembra 2003, ki ga je prejela 25. novembra 2003, v dopisu z dne 23. decembra 2003, ki ga je prejela 5. januarja 2004, in v dopisu z dne 12. februarja 2004, ki ga je prejela 17. februarja 2004, prejela pripombe zainteresiranih strani in regionalnih nemških organov, ki so odobrili pomoč.
Germany submitted comments to the Commission by letter of 5 November 2003, registered as received on 6 November 2003.
Nemčija je v dopisu z dne 5. novembra 2003, ki ga je Komisija prejela 6. novembra 2003, Komisiji sporočila svoje pripombe.
By letter of 7 March 2005, registered as received on 9 March 2005, Germany submitted further comments to the Commission and requested an assessment of the measure pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1860/2004 of 6 October 2004 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to de minimis aid in the agriculture and fisheries sectors.
Nemčija je v dopisu z dne 7. marca 2005, ki ga je Komisija prejela 9. marca 2005, Komisiji sporočila svoje dodatne pripombe in zahtevala oceno ukrepa v skladu s členom 5 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1860/2004 z dne 6. oktobra 2004 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES za de minimis pomoči v kmetijskem in ribiškem sektorju.
Title of the measure
Naziv ukrepa
Aid for the acquisition of shares by winegrowers in Rhineland-Palatinate
Pomoč vinogradnikom v zvezni deželi Porenje-Pfalz za nakup deležev
The scheme is based on the following:
Ukrep se izvaja na podlagi naslednjih štirih smernic:
the Guideline on granting assistance from funds of the rural district of Bernkastel-Wittlich to support winegrowers who join a winegrowers' cooperative;
Smernica o odobritvi pomoči iz sredstev okrožja Bernkastel-Wittlich za podpiranje vinogradnikov, ki so se pridružili vinarski zadrugi.
the Guideline on granting assistance from funds of the rural district of Cochem-Zell to support winegrowers who join a winegrowers' cooperative/producer organisation;
Smernica o odobritvi pomoči iz sredstev okrožja Cochem-Zell za podpiranje vinogradnikov, ki so se pridružili vinarski zadrugi/organizaciji proizvajalcev.
the Guideline on granting assistance from funds of the rural district of Trier-Saarburg to support winegrowers who join a winegrowers' cooperative/producer organisation;
Smernica o odobritvi pomoči iz sredstev okrožja Trier-Saarburg za podpiranje vinogradnikov, ki so se pridružili vinarski zadrugi/organizaciji proizvajalcev.
the Notice issued by the local authority association of Schweich to increase the assistance granted by the rural district of Trier-Saarburg to support winegrowers who join a winegrowers' cooperative/producer organisation.
Sporočilo združene občine Schweich o povečanju pomoči, ki jo je odobrilo okrožje Trier-Saarburg za podpiranje vinogradnikov, ki so pristopili vinarski zadrugi/organizaciji proizvajalcev.
The Guideline issued by the district administration of Bernkastel-Wittlich specifically provides for aid to purchase shares in the Moselland cooperative.
Smernica okrožne uprave Bernkastel-Wittlich določa pomoč za nakup deležev določene zadruge, tj. zadruge Moselland.
The Guidelines issued by the district administration of Cochem-Zell contain similar provisions, and this has led in practice to support being granted only for shares in the Moselland cooperative.
Smernice okrožne uprave Cochem-Zell vsebujejo podobne določbe, katerih posledica je bila, da je bila pomoč odobrena izključno za nakup deležev zadruge Moselland.
The Guidelines issued by the district administration of Trier Saarburg and the local authority association of Schweich are not specifically targeted at a particular company, but generally at cooperatives and producer organisations approved under the German Market Structure Act.
Smernice okrožne uprave Trier-Saarburg in združene občine Schweich se ne nanašajo na določeno podjetje, temveč na zadruge in organizacije proizvajalcev na splošno, ki so priznane na podlagi nemškega Zakona o tržni strukturi (Marktstrukturgesetz).
Aim of the measure
Cilj ukrepa
The aim of the scheme was to increase the proportion of grapes collected by producer organisations and to reduce the proportion of cask wine freely saleable, i.e. not sold via producer organisations.
Cilj ukrepa je bil povečati obstoječi delež grozdja, ki ga zberejo organizacije proizvajalcev, in zmanjšati delež vina v sodih v prosti prodaji, tj. vina, ki ga organizacije proizvajalcev niso prodale.
The objective was to help stabilise prices on the cask-wine market.
To naj bi pripomoglo k stabilizaciji cen na trgu vina v sodih.
At the same time the long-term objective was to close down production capacity in the form of vinification facilities on individual holdings, especially at small winegrowing enterprises in the Mosel-Saar-Ruwer winegrowing area.
Istočasno je bil dolgoročni cilj zapreti proizvodne kletne zmogljivosti na posameznih gospodarstvih, zlasti v malih vinogradniških podjetjih v vinogradniškem območju Mosel-Saar-Ruwer.
The aid was designed to cover part of winegrowing enterprises' costs when acquiring shares in winegrowers' cooperatives/producer organisations (hereinafter: producer organisations).
Pomoč je vinogradniškim podjetjem nadomestila del stroškov za nakup deležev vinarskih zadrug in organizacij proizvajalcev (v nadaljnjem besedilu „organizacije proizvajalcev“).
The aid was granted on condition that the winegrower undertook to keep the shares for five years from the date on which the application was filed.
Pomoč je bila odobrena, če se je vinogradnik zavezal, da bo deleže obdržal pet let od podaje zahtevka.
Each enterprise also had to bring into the producer organisation its total cultivated area and deliver all its grapes, must and wine to the producer organisation.
Poleg tega se je moralo podjetje s svojimi obdelanimi vinogradi pridružiti organizaciji proizvajalcev in ji oddati vse pridelano grozdje, mošt in vino.
Each enterprise was also required to shut down its corresponding vinification facilities.
Vinogradniško podjetje se je tudi obvezalo, da bo zaprlo svoje kletne zmogljivosti.
Budgetary appropriations of the aid
Finančna sredstva pomoči
The aid was granted in the form of direct grants and in the form of interest relief on capital-market loans.
Pomoč je bila dodeljena v obliki neposredne dotacije in dotacij za obresti posojil, pridobljenih na kapitalskih trgih.
The cost of acquiring shares was normally EUR 293,99. Where the cost was less, the grant was reduced proportionately.
Stroški za nakup deležev so znašali praviloma 293,33 EUR. Če so bili stroški za določen delež manjši, se je sorazmerno zmanjšala tudi dotacija.
The following grants per share were granted:
Za delež so bili odobrene naslednje dotacije:
Rural district/municipality
Okrožje ali občina
For the acquisition of 1 to 5 shares
Za nakup 1 do 5 deležev
For each additional share
Za vsak dodatni delež
Maximum grant per enterprise newly joining a producer organisation
Najvišja dotacija za novo pridruženo podjetje
No upper limit
brez zgornje meje
The assistance paid by the local authority association of Schweich was additional (cumulative) to payments in the rural district of Trier-Saarburg.
Dotacije združene občine Schweich so bile izplačane dodatno (kumulativno) poleg izplačil v okrožju Trier-Saarburg.
In the rural district of Cochem-Zell, interest relief of up to 4,95 % was granted on any loans taken out for the purchase of shares during a maximum period of four years.
V okrožju Cochem-Zell so bile dotacije za obresti za vsa posojila za nakup deležev odobrena v višini do 4,95 % za obdobje največ štirih let.
In 2000, the following payments were made to producer organisations:
Leta 2000 so bili organizacijam proizvajalcev izplačani naslednji zneski:
Winegrowers' cooperative Moselland
Vinarska zadruga Moselland
Producer organisation Moselherz
Vinarska zadruga Moselherz
Producer organisation Mosel Gate
Vinarska zadruga Mosel Gate
In 2000, a total of EUR 155460 was paid out. The scheme was financed from funds of the district administrations and of the Schweich local authority.
V letu 2000 je bilo izplačanih skupaj 155460 EUR. Ukrep je bil financiran iz sredstev okrožnih uprav in občine Schweich.
The duration of the scheme in the rural district of Cochem-Zell was four years (2000 to 2003).
Ukrep se je v okrožju Cochem-Zell izvajal štiri leta (od leta 2000 do leta 2003).
The other measures were limited to 2000.
Ostale sheme pomoči so bile omejene na leto 2000.
The aid was paid direct to the producer organisations which sold shares at reduced prices to newly-joining winegrowers and winegrowing enterprises.
Pomoč je bila izplačana neposredno organizacijam proizvajalcem, ki so deleže novo pridruženim vinogradnikom in vinogradniškim podjetjem prodale po nižji ceni.
Winegrowers and winegrowing enterprises in each rural district were thereby able to acquire shares in producer organisations at reduced cost.
Vinogradniki in vinogradniška podjetja v posameznem okrožju so lahko tako deleže organizacij proizvajalcev kupili z manjšimi stroški.
The measure enabled producer organisations to increase their own capital and secure the purchase of raw materials.
Organizacije proizvajalcev so lahko z ukrepom povečale lastni kapital in si zagotovile oskrbo s surovinami.
Reasons for initiating the procedure
Razlogi za sprožitev formalnega postopka preiskave
After provisional examination, the measure was classified as operating aid to winegrowing enterprises and producer organisations — which is incompatible with the common market.
Po začasni preiskavi je bil ta ukrep opredeljen kot pomoč za vinogradniška podjetja in organizacije proizvajalcev, ki ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The Commission therefore initiated a formal investigation procedure.
Zato je Komisija sprožila formalni postopek preiskave.
COMMENTS BY INTERESTED PARTIES
PRIPOMBE ZAINTERESIRANIH STRANI
Complaints against the measure
Pritožbe proti ukrepu
The Commission received a complaint concerning the introduction of the aid scheme.
Službe Komisije so prejele pritožbo v zvezi z uvajanjem zadevne sheme pomoči.
The complainant pointed out that the aid enabled winegrowers to acquire shares in local producer organisations at reduced prices.
Pritožniki so opozorili, da so vinogradniki s pomočjo deleže pri tamkajšnjih organizacijah proizvajalcev lahko kupili po nižjih cenah.
Besides the advantage of increased capital, the producer organisations were then also able to secure the purchase of raw materials in the form of must and raw wines.
Poleg povečanega kapitala so si organizacije proizvajalcev lahko zagotovile dobavo surovin za mošt in neobdelano vino.
The complainant argued that this placed competitors at a disadvantage regarding the procurement of must and raw wines.
Konkurenti oskrbe z moštom in neobdelanim vinom so bili tako oškodovani.
Comments by interested parties as part of the formal investigation procedure
Pripombe zainteresiranih strani v okviru formalnega postopka preiskave
The comments by interested parties/the German regional authorities granting the aid stressed the support given to necessary structural change in a 2000-year-old steep-slope winegrowing area whose conservation was hugely important for tourism and gastronomy.
Zainteresirane strani in regionalni nemški organi, ki so odobrili pomoč, so poudarili, da je treba podpreti nujno prestrukturiranje dvatisočletnega vinogradništva v strmih pobočjih, saj je njegova ohranitev izrednega pomena za turizem in gastronomijo.
They argued that the measure contributed towards closing down production capacity.
Cilj ukrepa je zapiranje proizvodnih zmogljivosti.
Application of Regulation (EC) No 1860/2004 was also requested.
Poleg tega so zaprosili za uporabo Uredbe št. 1860/2004.
In its comments, Germany emphasised the need for support for necessary structural change in a 2000-year-old steep-slope winegrowing area whose conservation was hugely important for tourism and gastronomy.
V svojih pripombah je Nemčija poudarila, da je treba podpreti nujno prestrukturiranje dvatisočletnega vinogradništva v strmih pobočjih, saj je njegova ohranitev izrednega pomena za turizem in gastronomijo.
The aid was intended to offset the disadvantages of winegrowers and winegrowing enterprises whose own vinification facilities had to be closed down in order to fulfil the five-year delivery obligation to the producer organisation, and was therefore justified as a capacity-reduction scheme.
Pomoč naj bi vinogradnikom in vinogradniškim podjetjem, ki so morali zapreti svoje kletne zmogljivosti, da bi lahko izpolnili petletno obveznost o oddaji organizacijam proizvajalcem, nadomestila nastalo škodo in je zato upravičena kot ukrep za zapiranje.
In additional comments, Germany requested the application of Regulation (EC) No 1860/2004.
Nemčija je v dodatnih pripombah zaprosila za uporabo Uredbe št. 1860/2004.
Article 36 the EC Treaty applies to winegrowing and wine processing, which are covered by Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine.
Člen 36 Pogodbe ES se uporablja na področjih vinogradništva in obdelave vina, ki sta zajeti v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1493/1999 z dne 17. maja 1999 o skupni ureditvi trga za vino.
According to the comments by Germany and the interested parties, the winegrowers' and winegrowing enterprises' economic difficulties were due to structural change in market outlets.
Po pripombah Nemčije in zainteresiranih strani so bile gospodarske težave vinogradnikov in vinogradniških podjetij pogojene s prestrukturiranjem prodaje.
The usual marketing of cask wine with own vinification facilities had become increasingly difficult.
Običajna prodaja vina v sodih z lastnimi kletnimi zmogljivostmi je bila vedno težja.
The market now required either raw materials (grapes or freshly-pressed must) or quality, market-oriented wines.
Trg je zahteval surovine (grozdje ali sveže iztisnjeni mošt) ali kakovostna in tržna vina.
Private companies could have entered into similar contracts with the winegrowing enterprises and could have taken over their marketing risks.
Zasebne družbe bi lahko z vinogradniškimi podjetji sklenile podobne pogodbe in tako prevzele njihovo tveganje prodaje.
In this context, as described in paragraph 12 above, the regional authorities bore part of the cost of buying shares in winegrowers' producer organisations.
Kot je opisano v odstavku 12, so v tem primeru regionalni organi delno nosili stroške nakupa deležev organizacij proizvajalcev vinogradnikov.
Buyers of shares in the producer organisations concerned were required to bring into the producer organisation their total cultivated area and deliver all their grapes, must and wine to the producer organisation.
Kupci deležev zadevnih organizacij proizvajalcev so se obvezali, da bodo celotno obdelano površino prenesli na organizacijo in da ji bodo oddali vse grozdje, mošt in vino.
The winegrowers had to undertake to keep the shares for five years, which in practice meant shutting down their vinification facilities.
Vinogradniška podjetja so se morala obvezati, da bodo deleže obdržala pet let, kar je hkrati pomenilo, da so morala zapreti svoje kletne zmogljivosti.
The producer organisations were better able — compared with other wine-production and wine-marketing companies — to secure the purchase of raw materials by requiring their winegrowers and winegrowing enterprises to deliver to them all the grapes, must and wine which they produced during a five-year period (see section II.2 above).
Organizacije proizvajalcev so si lahko tako v primerjavi z ostalimi organizacijami, ki proizvajajo in tržijo vino, zagotovile nakup surovin, saj so se vinogradniki in vinogradniška podjetja obvezali, da bodo vse proizvedeno grozdje, mošt in vino v naslednjih petih letih oddali organizaciji proizvajalcev (glej zgornji odstavek II.2).
Favouring the producer organisations by securing the commitment of winegrowers to deliver all their grapes, must and wine and to close down their own vinification facilities constitutes a structural measure strengthening the position of the producer organisations.
Dajanje prednosti organizacijam proizvajalcev, tj. zagotovitev vinogradniških podjetij, da bodo oddali vse grozdje, mošt in vino, kot tudi, da bodo zaprli svoje kletne zmogljivosti, je strukturni ukrep, ki je okrepil organizacije proizvajalcev.
The producer organisations' advantage of secured procurement, taken in isolation, can be justified as an effect of a market restructuring measure corresponding to the goals stipulated in Article 39 of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999.
Prednost zagotovljene oskrbe organizacij proizvajalcev se lahko ločeno gledano upraviči kot učinek ukrepa prestrukturiranja trga, ki ustreza ciljem iz člena 39 Uredbe št. 1493/1999.
State Aid
DRŽAVNA POMOČ
Under Article 71(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999,
V skladu s členom 71(1) Uredbe št. 1493/1999:
‘Save as otherwise provided in this Regulation, Articles 87, 88 and 89 of the Treaty shall apply to the production of and trade in the products covered by this Regulation.’
„Razen če ni v tej uredbi drugače določeno, se členi 87, 88 in 89 Pogodbe uporabljajo za proizvodnjo in trgovino s proizvodi, ki so zajeti v tej uredbi.“
Article 71(2) stipulates that
Člen 71(2) določa, da: