natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
They thus account for 100 % of production and represented a share of 1,5 % of imports into the Community market in the ERIP.
Predstavljata 100 % proizvodnje in predstavljata 1,5-odstotni delež uvoza na trg Skupnosti med OPPIU.
Both producers cooperated in the interim review but only one cooperated in the expiry review investigation.
Oba proizvajalca sta sodelovala v vmesnem pregledu, vendar samo en v preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa.
The other producer indicated that it did not want to cooperate in the expiry review.
Drugi proizvajalec je navedel, da v pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa ne želi sodelovati.
It argued that, besides the fact that the company only exported small quantities to the EU during Russia-interim review period, the company situation did not change significantly after the interim review which was initiated in August 2004 (see recitals 4 to 7 above).
Trdil je, da je družba med obdobjem vmesnega pregleda za Rusijo v EU izvažala samo majhno količino in da se stanje družbe po vmesnem pregledu, ki je bil začet avgusta 2004 (glej uvodne izjave 4 do 7), ni znatno spremenilo.
Partial interim review on measures in force against exporting producers in Russia
Delni vmesni pregled veljavnih ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za proizvajalca izvoznika v Rusiji
The partial interim reviews were limited to the level of dumping of both known Russian producers to the EU.
Delni vmesni pregledi so bili omejeni na stopnjo dampinga obeh ruskih proizvajalcev, znanih EU.
Full questionnaire replies were received from both.
Oba sta predložila v celoti izpolnjene vprašalnike.
Normal value was determined according to the general methodology described in recitals 43 and 47 above.
Normalna vrednost je bila določena v skladu s splošno metodologijo, opisano v uvodnih izjavah 43 do 47.
For one Russian exporting producer, normal value was based on the actual domestic prices in accordance with the methodology set out in recital 46 above.
Za enega ruskega proizvajalca izvoznika je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanskih domačih cenah v skladu z metodologijo, določeno v uvodni izjavi 46.
For the other Russian exporting producer, normal value was mainly based on the actual domestic prices, but it had to be constructed for certain product types in accordance with the methodology explained in recital 47 above.
Za drugega ruskega proizvajalca izvoznika je normalna vrednost temeljila predvsem na dejanskih domačih cenah, vendar jo je bilo treba za določene vrste izdelka konstruirati v skladu z metodologijo, pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 47.
For the determination of the export price, the general principles explained in detail in recitals 48 and 49 above were applied.
Za določitev izvozne cene so bila uporabljena splošna načela, podrobno razložena v uvodnih izjavah 48 in 49.
As regards the export sales to the Community made by one Russian exporting producer via a related trading company in Switzerland, the export price was established on the basis of the resale prices actually paid or payable to the latter by the first independent buyer in the Community during Russia-interim review period.
V zvezi z izvozom, ki ga je v Skupnost preko povezane trgovske družbe v Švici opravljal en ruski proizvajalec izvoznik, je bila izvozna cena določena na podlagi dejansko plačanih ali plačljivih cen pri nadaljnji prodaji prvemu neodvisnemu kupcu v Skupnosti med obdobjem vmesnega pregleda za Rusijo.
It should be noted that almost all exports by one Russian exporter to the Community were made under a price undertaking, accepted by the Commission in August 2001.
Treba je opozoriti, da je bil skoraj celoten izvoz enega ruskega izvoznika v Skupnost opravljen v skladu s cenovno zavezo, ki jo je Komisija sprejela avgusta 2001.
In that context, the determination of export prices was not limited only to an examination of the exporters' past behaviour, but the likely development of export prices in the future was also examined.
V tem smislu določitev izvoznih cen ni bila omejena na proučitev preteklega ravnanja izvoznika, temveč je bil proučen tudi možen razvoj izvoznih cen v prihodnosti.
In particular, the question whether the existence of this undertaking had influenced the level of the export prices, so as to make them unreliable for the establishment of future export behaviour.
Predvsem ali je obstoj te zaveze vplival na stopnjo izvoznih cen, da so postale nezanesljive za določitev izvoznikovega prihodnjega ravnanja.
It was further examined whether the export prices charged by the exporter to Community-based customers were reliable and could form a proper basis for the calculation of its dumping margin for the current investigation, despite the existence of a price undertaking.
Poleg tega je bilo proučeno, ali so bile izvozne cene, ki jih je izvoznik zaračunal strankam v Skupnosti, kljub cenovni zavezi zanesljive in bi za sedanjo preiskavo lahko pomenile ustrezno podlago za izračun njegove stopnje dampinga.
In particular, the investigation attempted to show whether the current export prices to the Community were artificially set in relation to the minimum import prices (MIPs) or not and therefore whether these were sustainable in the future.
Predvsem se je s preiskavo nameravalo proučiti, ali so bile trenutne izvozne cene v Skupnost umetno določene glede na minimalne uvozne cene („MIP“), torej, ali bi se lahko obdržale v prihodnosti.
However, the investigation showed that the system used to establish product control numbers (PCNs) for this investigation was more sophisticated than the classification system applied at the time when the undertaking was accepted in 2001.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da je bil sistem za določitev številčnih oznak izdelka („ŠOI“) za to preiskavo natančnejši kot sistem razvrščanja, ki se je uporabljal v času sprejema zaveze leta 2001.
This led to the conclusion that any comparison between the PCNs of the MIPs and those of the current investigation would not be reliable.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da nobena primerjava med ŠOI minimalnih uvoznih cen in tistih iz sedanje preiskave ne bi bila zanesljiva.
A comparison on a type-by-type basis between the export prices to the Community with prices charged to other third countries was made.
Izvedena je bila posamezna primerjava med izvoznimi cenami v Skupnost s cenami, zaračunanimi drugim tretjim državam.
This showed that export prices to third countries were on average substantially lower.
Ta je pokazala, da so bile izvozne cene v tretje države v povprečju znatno nižje.
It was therefore concluded that the export price of this company to the Community could not be used to establish reliable export prices in the meaning of Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, in the context of the present review.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da se v okviru sedanjega pregleda izvozne cene te družbe za Skupnost ne morejo upoštevati pri določanju zanesljivih izvoznih cen v smislu člena 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
In the absence of reliable export prices for sales to EU-15, sales to other countries were taken as a proxy for those export prices.
Brez zanesljivih izvoznih cen za prodajo v EU-15 je bila kot približek uporabljena prodaja v druge države.
Regarding the comparison between normal value and export price, the approach as described in recital 50 was followed.
Glede primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno je bil upoštevan pristop, opisan v uvodni izjavi 50.
As the related trader in Switzerland of one of Russian exporting producers has functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis, an adjustment to the export price for a commission was made in accordance with Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation.
Ker švicarski povezan trgovec enega od ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov opravlja podobne dejavnosti kot zastopnik, ki dela na podlagi provizije, so bile provizije za izvozno ceno prilagojene v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) osnovne uredbe.
The level of the commission was calculated based on direct evidence pointing to the existence of a mark-up related to such functions.
Stopnja provizije je bila izračunana na podlagi neposrednih dokazov, ki so kazali na skupen obstoj takšnih dejavnosti.
As provided for under Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, the weighted average normal value by type was compared with the weighted average export price of the corresponding type of the product concerned.
V skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe je bila tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost glede na vrsto izdelka primerjana s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno ustrezne vrste zadevnega izdelka.
As further explained in recitals 104 to 107 below, the comparison showed the existence of continued dumping for BMK.
Primerjava je za BMK pokazala obstoj nadaljevanja dampinga, kot je natančneje pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 104 do 107.
For SSM, the comparison between the weighted average normal value and weighted average sales price to countries where an undertaking was not in force also showed the existence of continued dumping.
Primerjava med tehtano povprečno izvozno normalno vrednostjo in tehtano povprečno prodajno ceno v države, za katere zaveza ni veljala, kaže za SSM na obstoj nadaljevanja dampinga.
BMK's dumping margin expressed as a percentage of the net, free-at-Community frontier price, duty unpaid, was found to be 36,2 %.
Stopnja dampinga za BMK, izražena kot odstotek za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti, dajatev neplačana, je bila 36,2 %.
SSM's dumping margin expressed on the same basis was found to be 9,7 %.
Ugotovljena stopnja dampinga SSM, izražena na enaki podlagi, je bila 9,7 %.
Definitive anti-dumping measures
Dokončni protidampinški ukrepi
In the light of the results of the dumping margins established in the interim review investigations, it is considered appropriate to amend the anti-dumping duty applicable to BMK to 36,2 % and to SSM to 9,7 %.
Glede na rezultate stopenj dampinga, določenih v preiskavah v zvezi z delnim vmesnim pregledom, je ustrezno, da se protidampinške dajatve, veljavne za BMK, spremenijo na 36,2 %, za SSM pa na 9,7 %.
Expiry review on measures in force against exporting producers in Russia
Pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za proizvajalce izvoznike v Rusiji
The company also represented around 50 % of total Russian production.
Družba predstavlja tudi približno 50 % celotne ruske proizvodnje.
The exports to the Community were at a low level and consisted of around 3300 tonnes during the ERIP, representing 1,5 % of EU consumption.
Izvoz v Skupnost je bil med OPPIU majhen in je znašal približno 3300 ton, kar pomeni 1,5 % potrošnje EU.
This apparent low market share should not hide the fact that large spare production capacity is available in Russia.
Ta očitno majhen tržni delež ne sme skriti dejstva, da so v Rusiji na voljo znatne neizkoriščene proizvodne zmogljivosti.
The share of the exports to the Community in quantity was less than 5 % of the total sales of the cooperating company.
Količinski delež izvoza v Skupnost je bil manj kot 5 % celotne prodaje sodelujoče družbe.
As mentioned above in recital 61 almost all exports by the cooperating company to the Community are subject to a price undertaking agreement.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 61, je bil skoraj ves izvoz sodelujoče družbe v Skupnost zavezan sporazumu o cenovni zavezi.
Wherever domestic prices of a particular product type sold by SSM could not be used in order to establish normal value because it had not been sold on the domestic market in representative quantities, another method had to be applied.
Kadar na podlagi domače cene določene vrste izdelka, ki ga je prodajal SSM, ni bilo mogoče določiti normalne vrednosti, ker izdelek na domačem trgu ni bil prodajan v reprezentativnih količinah, je bilo treba uporabiti drugo metodo.
In the absence of any other reasonable method, the constructed normal value per product type was used, as provided by SSM and verified by the Commission.
Ker ni bilo na voljo nobene druge ustrezne metode, je bila uporabljena konstruirana normalna vrednost za vrsto izdelka, ki jo je predložil SSM, Komisija pa jo je preverila.
As concerns cost of production, it was claimed by SSM that the cost structure for EU exports was different because of the different technical standards in the Community and Russian market.
Glede proizvodnih stroškov je SSM trdil, da je bila struktura stroškov za izvoz v Skupnost zaradi različnih tehničnih standardov na trgu Skupnosti in na ruskem trgu drugačna.
According to the company, SWR sold on the Community market have to be in conformity with the so-called DIN standard, which is not a requirement in Russia.
Družba je trdila, da mora biti SWR, prodajan na trgu Skupnosti, v skladu s tako imenovanim standardom DIN, v Rusiji pa te zahteve ni.
The table including the cost of production (COP) of SWR sold domestically and to the Community showed that there were no significant differences between the various types.
Preglednica, ki vključuje proizvodne stroške (PS) SWR, prodajanih na domačem trgu in v Skupnost, kaže, da med različnimi vrstami ni bilo znatnih razlik.
For some product types, the domestic COP was slightly higher, for others the Community COP was slightly lower.
Za nekatere vrste so bili za malenkost višji PS za domači trg, za druge pa so bili nižji PS za trg Skupnosti.
Therefore, it was concluded that this alleged difference could not affect the dumping calculations.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da ta domnevna razlika ni mogla vplivati na izračun dampinga.
With regard to the exports to the Community, except for one transaction, the producer sold the product concerned directly in the Community without the intervention of any related party.
Proizvajalec je v zvezi z izvozom v Skupnost, razen ene same transakcije, zadevni izdelek prodajal neposredno v Skupnost, brez posredovanja katere koli povezane stranke.
The exporter submitted evidence that the one transaction did not concern the product concerned and was therefore not taken into consideration in the calculations.
Izvoznik je predložil dokaze, da ta transakcija ni bila povezana z zadevnim izdelkom, zato pri izračunih ni bila upoštevana.
In accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, the dumping margin was established on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average normal value with the weighted average export prices per product type.
V skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe je bila stopnja dampinga določena na podlagi primerjave med tehtanim povprečjem normalne vrednosti in tehtanim povprečjem izvoznih cen za vrsto izdelka.
This comparison showed the absence of dumping during the expiry review investigation period.
Primerjava je pokazala, da dampinga med obdobjem preiskave v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa ni bilo.
The comparison of the data concerning exports to the Community provided by the exporting producers and the total volume of imports as derived from the Eurostat import statistics indicated that the level of cooperation was high, since, the cooperating exporting producer represented roughly the totality of all Community imports from Russia during the IP.
Primerjava podatkov v zvezi z izvozom v Skupnost, ki so jih predložili proizvajalci izvozniki, in celotnega uvoza, razvidnih iz Eurostatovih statističnih podatkov o uvozu, je pokazala, da je bila stopnja sodelovanja visoka, saj je sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik med OP predstavljal skoraj ves uvoz Skupnosti iz Rusije.
Interim review on measures in force against one exporting producer in Thailand
Vmesni pregled veljavnih ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za proizvajalca izvoznika na Tajskem
Normal value was based on the price paid or payable in the ordinary course of trade by independent customers on the domestic market in accordance with Article 2(1) of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost je temeljila na cenah, ki so jih v običajnem poteku trgovine plačevale ali jih plačujejo neodvisne stranke na domačem trgu, v skladu s členom 2(1) osnovne uredbe.
During the Thailand-interim review investigation period the company sold the product concerned directly to end-users on the domestic market.
Družba je med obdobjem preiskave, uporabljenim za vmesni pregled za Tajsko zadevni izdelek prodajala neposredno končnim uporabnikom na domačem trgu.
Normal value was based on profitable sales only.
Normalna vrednost je temeljila samo na dobičkonosni prodaji.
The applicant and cooperating producer Usha Siam exported a limited quantity of SWR to the Community during the Thailand-interim review period.
Vložnik in sodelujoči proizvajalec Usha Siam je med obdobjem vmesnega pregleda – Tajska v Skupnost izvozil omejeno količino SWR.
These exports were subject to a price undertaking.
Ta izvoz je bil predmet cenovne zaveze.
For the direct sales to the Community market, the export prices were based on the price paid or payable in the ordinary course of trade by independent customers in the Community in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Za neposredno prodajo na trg Skupnosti so izvozne cene temeljile na cenah, ki so jih v običajnem poteku trgovine plačevale ali jih plačujejo neodvisne stranke v Skupnosti, v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
For the export sales made via the related importer, Usha Martin UK, export prices were constructed on the basis of the prices at which the imported product was first resold to independent customers in the Community, in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Za izvoz, opravljen preko povezanega uvoznika Usha Martin UK, so bile izvozne cene konstruirane na podlagi cen, po katerih je bil zadevni izdelek prvič prodan neodvisni stranki v Skupnosti, v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
Allowance was made for all costs incurred between importation and resale, including selling, general and administrative costs and the profit realised in the Community by the related importer during the investigation period.
Izvedene so bile prilagoditve vseh stroškov, nastalih med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, vključno s prodajnimi, splošnimi in administrativnimi stroški ter dobičkom, ki ga je v obdobju preiskave v Skupnosti ustvaril povezani uvoznik.
The normal value was compared with the average export price for each type of the product concerned, on an ex-works basis and at the same level of trade.
Normalna vrednost je bila primerjana s povprečno izvozno ceno za vsako vrsto zadevnega izdelka, na podlagi franko tovarna in na isti ravni trgovine.
In accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, and for the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison, factors which were claimed and demonstrated to affect price and price comparability were taken into account.
V skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe in za zagotovitev poštene primerjave so bili upoštevani dejavniki, za katere se je trdilo in dokazalo, da vplivajo na ceno in primerljivost cen.
In accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, the dumping margin was established per product type on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average normal value with the weighted average export prices at the same level of trade.
V skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe je bila stopnja dampinga glede za vrsto izdelka določena na podlagi primerjave med tehtano povprečno normalno vrednostjo in tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno pri enaki stopnji trgovine.
This comparison showed the absence of dumping during the interim review investigation period.
Primerjava je pokazala, da dampinga med obdobjem preiskave, uporabljenim za vmesni pregled, ni bilo.
Expiry review on measures in force against exporting producers in Thailand
Pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za proizvajalce izvoznike na Tajskem
Out of the three known producers of SWR in Thailand, one company cooperated in the investigation.
Od 3 znanih proizvajalcev SWR na Tajskem je ena družba sodelovala v preiskavi.
On the basis of the information collected, this company represented almost 100 % of Thailand's total exports to the Community during the ERIP.
Na podlagi pridobljenih informacij ta družba predstavlja skoraj 100 % celotnega tajskega izvoza v Skupnost med OPPIU.
The company also represented around 80 % of total Thai production.
Družba predstavlja tudi približno 80 % celotne tajske proizvodnje.
Exports to the Community were at a very low level during the review investigation period.
Izvoz v Skupnost je bil med obdobjem preiskave v zvezi s pregledom na zelo nizki stopnji.
Exports by the cooperating company to the Community are subject to a price undertaking.
Izvoz sodelujoče družbe v Skupnost je predmet cenovne zaveze.
The full cost of production for each exported product type was found to be higher than the domestic price during the ERIP.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so bili med OPPIU celotni proizvodni stroški za vsako izvoženo vrsto izdelka višji od domače cene.
As a consequence, it was not possible to establish normal value on the basis of prices paid or payable in the ordinary course of trade by independent customers on the domestic market, in accordance with Article 2(1) of the basic Regulation for any of the types of SWR exported by the Thai cooperating exporting producer.
Zato za katero koli vrsto SWR, ki jo je izvažal tajski sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik, ni bilo mogoče določiti normalne vrednosti na podlagi cen, ki so jih v običajnem poteku trgovine plačevale ali jih plačujejo neodvisne stranke na domačem trgu, v skladu s členom 2(1) osnovne uredbe.
The domestic prices were constructed on the basis of the exporting producer's own cost of manufacturing and selling, general and administrative expenses and a reasonable margin of 5 % for profit on the basis of Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation and in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi člena 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe in v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe so bile domače cene konstruirane na podlagi lastnih stroškov proizvodnje, prodaje, splošnih in administrativnih stroškov proizvajalca izvoznika ter običajne 5 % stopnje dobička.
The cooperating exporting producer exported the product concerned via a related company in the Community.
Sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik je zadevni izdelek izvozil preko povezane družbe v Skupnosti.
As a consequence, and in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, export prices were constructed on the basis of the prices at which the imported product was first resold to independent customers in the Community.
Zato in v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe so bile izvozne cene konstruirane na podlagi cen, po katerih je bil uvožen izdelek prvič preprodan neodvisnim kupcem v Skupnosti.
Allowance was made for all costs incurred between importation and resale, including selling, general and administrative costs and the profit realised in the Community by the importing company during the review investigation period.
Izvedene so bile prilagoditve vseh stroškov, nastalih med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, vključno s prodajnimi, splošnimi in administrativnimi stroški ter dobičkom, ki ga je v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom v Skupnosti ustvarila družba uvoznica.
In accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, and for the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison, differences in factors which were claimed and demonstrated to affect price and price comparability were taken into account.
V skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe in za zagotovitev poštene primerjave so bile upoštevane razlike dejavnikov, za katere se je trdilo in dokazalo, da vplivajo na ceno in primerljivost cen.
This comparison showed the existence of relatively low dumping during the ERIP, compared to the original Regulation.
Ta primerjava je pokazala obstoj relativno nizkega dampinga med OPPIU v primerjavi z prvotno uredbo.
The weighted average dumping margin expressed as a percentage of the CIF value at the Community frontier was 7,6 %.
Tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga, izražena v odstotkih vrednosti CIF meja Skupnosti, je bila 7,6 %.
There are two exporting producers in Turkey; both Celik Halat (Halat) and Has Celik (Has) cooperated in the expiry review investigation and Has cooperated in the partial interim review concerning its level of dumping.
V Turčiji sta dva proizvajalca izvoznika; tako Celik Halat („Halat“) in Has Celik („Has“) sta sodelovala v preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa, Has pa je sodeloval še v delnem vmesnem pregledu v zvezi s svojo stopnjo dampinga.