natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission continued to seek and verify all information it deemed necessary for its definitive findings.
Komisija je še naprej iskala in preverjala vse informacije, za katere je menila, da so pomembne za njene dokončne ugotovitve.
All interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty and the definitive collection of amounts secured by way of the provisional duty (the ‘final disclosure’).
Vse zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o pomembnih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih naj bi priporočili uvedbo dokončnih protidampinških dajatev in dokončno pobiranje zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo („dokončno razkritje“).
The interested parties were also granted a period within which they could make representations subsequent to this disclosure.
Določen je bil tudi rok, v katerem naj bi zainteresirane stranke po tem razkritju predstavile svoja stališča.
The oral and written comments submitted by the parties were considered and, where appropriate, the findings have been modified accordingly.
Obravnavale so se ustne in pisne pripombe, ki so jih izrazile stranke, ugotovitve pa so bile, kjer je bilo primerno, ustrezno spremenjene.
In the absence of any comments concerning the product concerned and the like product, recitals 9 to 12 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom in podobnim izdelkom ni bilo pripomb, se uvodne izjave 9 do 12 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, the exporting producer referred to in recital 17 of the provisional Regulation alleged that the analysis carried out by the Commission ignored certain important elements affecting the cost of production and, thus, the normal value determination.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov je proizvajalec izvoznik s sklicevanjem na uvodno izjavo 17 začasne uredbe navedel, da se v analizi, ki jo je izvedla Komisija, niso upoštevali nekateri pomembni elementi, ki vplivajo na proizvodne stroške in s tem na določitev normalne vrednosti.
It claimed that its normal value should be based on its own cost of production instead of being determined on the basis of the domestic prices in the ordinary course of trade of the other cooperating exporting producer.
Navedel je, da bi morala normalna vrednost temeljiti na lastnih proizvodnih stroških, namesto da se določi na podlagi domačih cen med običajnim potekom trgovanja drugega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika.
Firstly, the aforesaid allegations concerning the cost of production were not found justified.
Prvič, navedene obtožbe v zvezi s proizvodnimi stroški niso upravičene.
Secondly, pursuant to Article 2 of the basic Regulation, the methodology applied by the Commission in determining the normal value for the exporting producer in question (see recital 17 of the provisional Regulation) is considered to be the most appropriate for the following reasons: (i) the exporting producer in question had no domestic sales of the like product and of the same general category of products in the IP, (ii) the products are perfectly interchangeable and (iii) only one other exporting producer cooperated in the investigation.
Drugič, v skladu s členom 2 osnovne uredbe je metodologija, ki jo je uporabila Komisija za določanje normalne vrednosti za zadevnega proizvajalca izvoznika (glej uvodno izjavo 17 začasne uredbe), najbolj primerna iz naslednjih razlogov: (i) zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik ni imel domače prodaje podobnega izdelka in enake splošne kategorije izdelkov v OP, (ii) izdelki so povsem zamenljivi in (iii) v preiskavi je poleg tega proizvajalca sodeloval le še en proizvajalec izvoznik.
Moreover, if the normal value had not been based on prices of the other Indian producer, it would have been necessary to determine the amounts for selling, for general and administrative costs and for profits pursuant to Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba določiti vrednosti za prodajo za splošne in upravne stroške ter za dobiček v skladu s členom 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe, če normalna vrednost ne bi temeljila na cenah drugega indijskega proizvajalca.
On balance, the use of domestic sales prices of the other Indian producer appears to be the most representative basis for reflecting prevailing sales conditions on the Indian domestic market and hence for establishing normal value.
Tako pa se zdi uporaba domačih prodajnih cen drugega indijskega proizvajalca najbolj reprezentativna podlaga za odraz prevladujočih prodajnih razmer na indijskem notranjem trgu in s tem za določitev normalne vrednosti.
The claim was therefore rejected.
Zato je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
In view of the above and in the absence of any other comments concerning normal value, recitals 13 to 17 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega in ker v zvezi z normalno vrednostjo ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 13 do 17 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments, recital 18 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb, se uvodna izjava 18 začasne uredbe potrdi.
One exporting producer claimed that the Commission, when determining for comparison purposes the adjustments to the export price, made certain non-justified deductions in relation to certain elements concerning transport, handling and credit costs.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je navedel, da je Komisija pri ugotavljanju prilagoditev izvoznih cen za namene primerjave upoštevala določene neutemeljene odbitke pri določenih elementih v zvezi s prevoznimi in manipulativnimi stroški ter stroški kreditov.
The Commission accepted the claim and revised the relevant adjustments accordingly.
Komisija se je s trditvijo strinjala in pregledala ustrezne prilagoditve.
In the absence of any other comments in this respect, recital 19 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s tem ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodna izjava 19 začasne uredbe potrdi.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, one party argued that for those exporting producers which did not cooperate a higher dumping margin should be calculated based on the lowest CIF prices of the cooperating exporting producers.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov je ena stranka navedla, da je treba za tiste proizvajalce izvoznike, ki niso sodelovali v preiskavi, določiti višjo stopnjo dampinga na podlagi najnižjih cen CIF sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
In this respect, it is noted that no indications were found showing that the non-cooperating companies were dumping in the IP at a higher level than the cooperating companies.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da ni bilo nobenih znakov, da so se nesodelujoče družbe ukvarjale z dampingom v OP intenzivneje kot sodelujoče družbe.
On the contrary, a comparison between Eurostat data concerning imports originating in India and the volume and value of exports to the Community reported by the cooperating exporting producers shows that (i) the volume of imports into the Community from any non-cooperating exporting producers represented less than 20 % of the total imports from India in the IP (the precise ratio cannot be disclosed for confidentiality reasons), and (ii) the prices charged by any non-cooperating exporting producers on the Community market were apparently higher than those charged by the cooperating companies.
Nasprotno je primerjava med podatki Eurostata o uvozu s poreklom iz Indije ter podatki o količini in obsegu izvoza v Skupnost, ki so jih predložili sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki, pokazala, (i) da je bil obseg uvoza v Skupnost, ki ga je opravil kateri koli nesodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik, nižji od 20 % celotnega uvoza iz Indije v OP (natančnega razmerja zaradi zaupnosti ni mogoče razkriti) in (ii) da so bile cene, ki so jih na trgu Skupnosti zaračunali nesodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki, očitno višje od tistih, ki so jih zaračunale sodelujoče družbe.
This claim was thus rejected.
Zato je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
Following the final disclosure, the same party reiterated the above claim concerning the dumping margin of any non-cooperating exporting producers.
Po končnem razkritju je ista stranka ponovila zgoraj navedeno trditev glede stopnje dampinga za nesodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike.
No new arguments were brought forward, which could alter the conclusions drawn in recital 14 above.
Izraženi niso bili nobeni novi argumenti, ki bi lahko spremenili sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 14 zgoraj.
The party concerned only added that it could not verify the import data used in the analysis carried out by the Commission, since they were allegedly kept confidential.
Zadevna stranka je zgolj dodala, da ni mogla preveriti podatkov o uvozu, ki so bili uporabljeni v analizi, ki jo je izvedla Komisija, ker so bili ti domnevno zaupni.
The company was informed that the import volume and the average import price were set out in detail in recitals 38 and 39 of the provisional Regulation and that the source statistics, i.e. Eurostat, were open to the public.
Družbo so obvestili, da sta bila obseg uvoza in povprečna uvozna cena natančno določena v uvodnih izjavah 38 in 39 začasne uredbe ter da so bili izvorni statistični podatki, tj. podatki Eurostata, dostopni javnosti.
Thus, the company was in no case prevented from verifying the Commission’s conclusions and defending its rights.
Zato se družbi v nobenem primeru ni preprečilo preverjanje sklepnih ugotovitev Komisije in zagovarjanje njenih pravic.
The claim is therefore rejected.
Zato je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
In the light of the above, the definitive dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Community frontier price, duty unpaid, are the following:
Glede na zgoraj navedeno so dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, naslednje:
Following the imposition of provisional measures, one exporting producer submitted that the Community producer which had made substantial imports of dihydromyrcenol from India in the IP (see recital 25 of the provisional Regulation) should be excluded from the definition of the Community industry and consequently the injury analysis, including the injury elimination level determination.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov je en proizvajalec izvoznik navedel, da je treba proizvajalca Skupnosti, ki je uvozil znatno količino dihidromircenola iz Indije v OP (glej uvodno izjavo 25 začasne uredbe), izključiti iz opredelitve industrije Skupnosti in torej tudi iz analize škode, vključno z določitvijo stopnje odpravljanja škode.
In this respect, it is recalled that the Community producer in question did not shift its core business from production to importation.
V tej zvezi je treba opozoriti, da zadevni proizvajalec Skupnosti ni preusmeril svoje glavne dejavnosti iz proizvodnje v uvoz.
Indeed, it had made the aforesaid imports from India in particular in order to maintain its own production of the like product viable.
Navedeni uvoz iz Indije je opravljal predvsem zato, ker je želel obdržati svojo proizvodnjo podobnega izdelka.
Therefore, no grounds for excluding this company from the Community industry exist.
Zato ni nobene podlage za izključitev te družbe iz industrije Skupnosti.
Furthermore, it is noted that even if the producer in question was excluded from the definition of the Community industry, the injury finding would not have been different.
Treba je opozoriti, da tudi če bi zadevnega proizvajalca izključili iz opredelitve industrije Skupnosti, se ugotovitve glede škode ne bi razlikovale.
The same exporting producer also argued that the overall economic situation of the Community producers was very good; in particular, it had allegedly improved significantly in 2005 and in the IP and such positive trend would most likely continue in the near future according to this exporter.
Isti proizvajalec izvoznik je tudi trdil, da je splošni gospodarski položaj proizvajalcev Skupnosti zelo dober, da se je domnevno znatno izboljšal zlasti v letu 2005 in v OP ter da se bo tak pozitiven trend po prepričanju tega izvoznika zelo verjetno v bližnji prihodnosti nadaljeval.
These conclusions were based on the development of the Community industry’s production and sales volume, stocks and market share presented in recitals 45 to 47 of the provisional Regulation.
Te ugotovitve so temeljile na razvoju proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti in obsegu prodaje, zalogah ter tržnem deležu, ki so navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 45 do 47 začasne uredbe.
This argument cannot be accepted because it does not properly take account of the fact that there was a dramatic drop in sales prices of dihydromyrcenol in the Community (see recitals 47 to 49 of the provisional Regulation), and that the Community industry only managed to increase its production and sales volume and, thus, maintain its share on the expanding Community market at the price of severe losses, a fall in return on investment and cash outflow.
Tega argumenta ni mogoče sprejeti, ker ne upošteva dovolj dejstva, da je prišlo do močnega znižanja prodajnih cen dihidromircenola v Skupnosti (glej uvodne izjave 47 do 49 začasne uredbe) in da je industriji Skupnosti komaj uspelo povečati svojo proizvodnjo in obseg prodaje ter obdržati svoj delež na rastočem trgu Skupnosti, in sicer na račun velikih izgub, zmanjšanja donosa posamezne naložbe in denarnih odlivov.
Following the final disclosure, the exporting producer referred to in recital 17 above reiterated its claim and added that the Commission had not properly analysed the situation of the Community producer in question, i.e. the producer which had made substantial imports of the product concerned.
Po končnem razkritju je proizvajalec izvoznik, naveden v uvodni izjavi 17 zgoraj, ponovil svojo trditev in dodal, da Komisija ni ustrezno analizirala položaja zadevnega proizvajalca Skupnosti, tj. proizvajalca, ki je uvozil znatno količino zadevnega izdelka.
In particular, the following aspects were allegedly not analysed: (i) the percentage of the total Community production of the product concerned that is accounted for by this importing producer; (ii) the nature of this importing producer’s interest in importation; (iii) the level of long term nature of commitment shown by this importing producer to domestic production as opposed to continued importation; and (iv) the ratio of imports to domestic production for this importing producer.
Domnevno ni analizirala zlasti naslednjih vidikov: (i) odstotka celotne proizvodnje Skupnosti zadevnega izdelka, ki odpade na tega proizvajalca uvoznika, (ii) narave interesa za uvoz tega proizvajalca uvoznika, (iii) ravni dolgoročne narave zavez, ki jih je pokazal ta proizvajalec uvoznik do domače proizvodnje za razliko od neprekinjenega uvoza, in (iv) razmerja uvoza do domače proizvodnje za tega proizvajalca uvoznika.
In this respect, it is noted that all of the points raised concerning the situation of the Community producer in question had indeed been properly analysed; however, certain details could not be disclosed in view of their confidential nature.
V tem smislu je treba opozoriti, da so bile vse točke v zvezi s položajem zadevnega proizvajalca Skupnosti dejansko primerno analizirane, vendar določenih podrobnosti ni bilo mogoče razkriti zaradi njihove zaupne narave.
As can be seen from recital 25 of the provisional Regulation and recital 17 above, the main reasons for non-excluding the producer in question from the definition of the Community industry, and from the Community production, were (i) the nature of its interest in importation (i.e. it imported the product concerned in order to maintain its own production in the Community of the like product viable), and (ii) the marginal impact of its situation on the overall situation of the Community industry (i.e. the fact that its possible exclusion would not alter the injury findings).
Kot je razvidno iz uvodne izjave 25 začasne uredbe in uvodne izjave 17 zgoraj, so bili glavni razlogi za neizključitev zadevnega proizvajalca iz opredelitve industrije Skupnosti in proizvodnje Skupnosti (i) narava njegovega interesa za uvoz (tj. zadevni izdelek je uvozil, ker je želel obdržati svojo proizvodnjo podobnega izdelka v Skupnosti) in (ii) zanemarljiv vpliv njegovega položaja na celotni položaj industrije Skupnosti (tj. dejstvo, da možna izključitev ne bi spremenila ugotovitev glede škode).
Finally, it goes without saying, that by supporting the complaint and fully cooperating with the investigation this producer aimed at curbing the influx of dumped imports from India.
Jasno je, da je bil cilj tega proizvajalca zmanjševanje vdora dampinškega uvoza iz Indije, s tem ko je podprl pritožbo in v celoti sodeloval v preiskavi.
It has therefore clearly demonstrated its commitment to domestic production as opposed to continued importation.
S tem je jasno pokazal svojo zavezo domači proizvodnji za razliko od nadaljnjega uvoza.
The allegations cited in recital 19 above are therefore rejected.
Zato so bile obtožbe, navedene v uvodni izjavi 19 zgoraj, zavrnjene.
With reference to recital 41 of the provisional Regulation, one exporting producer submitted that the price undercutting should have been based on the average import price from India rather than the import prices of the cooperating exporting producers.
V zvezi z uvodno izjavo 41 začasne uredbe je en proizvajalec izvoznik navedel, da bi moralo nelojalno nižanje cen temeljiti na povprečni uvozni ceni iz Indije in ne na uvoznih cenah sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
In this respect, it is noted that given the level of cooperation in this case, i.e. more than 80 %, and given that the total import statistics are based on an ex CN code, i.e. they may include certain quantity of products other than dihydromyrcenol (see recital 36 of the provisional Regulation), the price comparison based on the average import price would be much less precise than the individual company undercutting margins established.
V tem smislu je treba opozoriti, da je glede na raven sodelovanja v tej zadevi, tj. več kot 80 %, in glede na to, da statistični podatki celotnega uvoza temeljijo na oznaki ex KN, tj. lahko vsebujejo določeno količino izdelkov poleg dihidromircenola (glej uvodno izjavo 36 začasne uredbe), primerjava cene, ki temelji na povprečni uvozni ceni, veliko manj natančna od stopenj nelojalnih znižanj, ki so jih uvedle posamezne družbe.
In view of the above and in the absence of any other comments concerning injury, recitals 23 to 56 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega in ker v zvezi s škodo ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 23 do 56 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, one exporting producer claimed that imports from India had not caused injury to the Community industry because their price was on the rise and their market share fell by 2,4 percentage points in the IP.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov je en proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da uvoz iz Indije industriji Skupnosti ni povzročil škode, ker je njegova cena rasla, njegov tržni delež pa v OP zmanjšal za 2,4 odstotne točke.
This line of reasoning omits several important aspects of the development of the dumped imports from India and of the situation on the Community market.
Te utemeljitve izpuščajo veliko pomembnih vidikov razvoja dampinškega uvoza iz Indije in položaja na trgu Skupnosti.
As it was demonstrated in recitals 38 to 42 of the provisional Regulation, the volume of dumped imports of the product concerned from India into the Community increased from around 25000 kilograms in 2003 to around 760000 kilograms in the IP.
Kot je bilo prikazano v uvodnih izjavah 38 do 42 začasne uredbe, se je obseg dampinškega uvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Indije v Skupnost povečal z okrog 25000 kilogramov v letu 2003 na 760000 kilogramov v OP.
The market share of these imports increased from 0,7 % in 2003 to 17,3 % in the IP.
Tržni delež tega uvoza se je povečal z 0,7 % v letu 2003 na 17,3 % v OP.
The slight decrease of their share in the IP was due to a sudden expansion of the Community market in this period, rather than any decline in their volume; indeed, the volume of the dumped imports from India continued increasing in the IP, although not at the same rate as in the previous period.
Rahlo zmanjšanje tega deleža v OP je posledica nenadne širitve trga Skupnosti v tem obdobju in ne zmanjšanja obsega uvoza; povečevanje obsega dampinškega uvoza iz Indije se je v OP sicer nadaljevalo, vendar ne po enaki stopnji kot v prejšnjem obdobju.
Overall, the presence of dumped imports from India on the Community market increased much more significantly than the Community consumption over the period considered.
Prisotnost dampinškega uvoza iz Indije se je na trgu Skupnosti na splošno veliko bolj povečala kot poraba Skupnosti v obravnavanem obdobju.
Finally, it is recalled that the dumped imports from India undercut the prices of the Community industry by substantial margins.
Treba je opozoriti, da je dampinški uvoz iz Indije z znatnimi stopnjami nelojalno nižal cene industrije Skupnosti.
The surge of dumped imports at prices significantly undercutting the Community industry’s prices clearly coincided in time with the worsened situation of the Community industry.
Povečanje dampinškega uvoza po cenah, ki bistveno nelojalno nižajo cene industrije Skupnosti, jasno časovno sovpada s poslabšanjem položaja industrije Skupnosti.
The same exporting producer further argued that any injury sustained by the Community industry had been self-inflicted.
Isti proizvajalec izvoznik je tudi trdil, da si je industrija Skupnosti sama povzročila vso škodo, ki jo je utrpela.
They alleged that otherwise it was not possible to suffer losses in an environment of increasing demand, increased prices, consequently increasing sales and turnover, and increasing productivity.
Navedel je, da sicer ne bi bilo mogoče utrpeti izgub v okolju, kjer povpraševanje narašča, cene se zvišujejo, posledično pa tudi prodaja in prihodki od prodaje ter produktivnost.
As a possible explanation, this party cited the increased average salary by 24 % from 2003 to the IP.
Kot možno razlago je ta stranka navedla povečanje povprečne plače za 24 % od leta 2003 do OP.
Firstly, although the Community industry’s sales price on the Community market increased by 2 % between 2005 and the IP, it was more than 30 % lower than in 2003, while the volume of sales of the Community industry only increased by 22 % between 2003 and the IP (see recital 47 of the provisional Regulation).
Prvič, čeprav so se prodajne cene industrije Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti med letom 2005 in OP povečale za 2 %, so bile za več kot 30 % nižje od tistih v letu 2003, medtem ko se je obseg prodaje industrije Skupnosti med letom 2003 in OP povečal zgolj za 22 % (glej uvodno izjavo 47 začasne uredbe).
As a result, the sales revenue of the Community industry on the Community market decreased significantly, i.e. by around 15 % over the period considered.
Zato so se prihodki od prodaje industrije Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti znatno zmanjšali, tj. za okrog 15 % v obravnavanem obdobju.
Secondly, the average labour cost development must be seen together with the employment and productivity trends.
Drugič, razvoj povprečnih stroškov dela je treba obravnavati skupaj s trendom zaposlovanja in produktivnosti.
As explained in recital 51 of the provisional Regulation, the 24 % increase over the period considered of the labour cost per worker was due, inter alia, to the changes in employment structure towards a higher share of qualified labour.
Kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi 51 začasne uredbe, je bilo 24-odstotno povečanje stroškov dela na delavca v obravnavanem obdobju med drugim posledica sprememb v zaposlitveni strukturi, ki stremi k večjemu deležu izobražene delovne sile.
The figures confirm that these changes resulted in higher productivity, which in turn compensated the increased average labour cost.
Podatki potrjujejo, da se te spremembe odražajo v večji produktivnosti, ki je uravnala povečane povprečne stroške dela.
As a result, the total labour cost per unit produced remained the same.
Zato je ostal celotni strošek dela na proizvedeno enoto enak.