natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This Regulation entered into force on 1 January 2005 and applies to aid granted before its entry into force, if individual aid fulfils all the conditions laid down in its Articles 1 and 3.
Ta uredba je začela veljati 1. januarja 2005 in velja za pomoči, dodeljene pred njenim začetkom veljavnosti, če posamezne pomoči izpolnjujejo vse pogoje iz členov 1 in 3 Uredbe.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1860/2004 states that aid granted in the fields of agricultural products or fisheries products up to EUR 3000 per beneficiary over any period of three years, within a maximum amount established for each Member State (being for Greece for agriculture and for fisheries respectively EUR 34965000 and EUR 2036370) is not State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty provided it is not fixed on the basis of price or quantity of products put on the market, nor related to export (linked to the quantities exported, to the establishment and operation of a distribution network or to other current expenditure linked to export activity), nor contingent upon the use of domestic over imported products.
V Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1860/2004 je navedeno, da pomoč, dodeljena za kmetijske ali ribiške izdelke, ki ne presega zgornje meje 3000 EUR na upravičenca v katerem koli obdobju treh let, v najvišjem znesku, ki je določen za posamezno državo članico (za Grčijo znesek za kmetijske izdelke znaša 34965000 EUR oziroma 2036370 EUR za ribiške izdelke), ni državna pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe, če ni določena na podlagi cene ali količine izdelkov, danih na trg, ali povezana z izvozom (vezana na izvožene količine, na vzpostavitev in delovanje distribucijskega omrežja ali na druge tekoče izdatke, povezane z izvozno dejavnostjo) ali odvisna od uporabe domačih izdelkov v breme uvoženih izdelkov.
Within the framework of the scheme based on Law 3220/2004, aid complying with the above mentioned conditions will not be considered as State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty.
Znotraj sheme, ki jo določa zakon 3220/2004, se pomoči, ki izpolnjuje zgoraj navedene pogoje, ne šteje za državno pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe.
The law contains no provision limiting the amount of aid a beneficiary can receive to EUR 3000 or the maximum de minimis amount for Greece.
Zakon ne vsebuje določbe, s katero bi se višina pomoči, ki jo lahko prejme upravičenec, omejila na 3000 EUR ali bi omejila največjo višino de minimis pomoči za Grčijo.
Furthermore, the provisions of Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1860/2004 regarding cumulation and monitoring are not respected.
Poleg tega nista upoštevani določbi člena 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 1860/2004 o kumulaciji in spremljanju.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006 of 15 December 2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to de minimis aid [112] may be applicable — according to Article 5(1) thereof — to the transport sector and undertakings active in the processing and marketing of agricultural products, if the aid fulfils all the conditions laid down in its Articles 1 and 2.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1998/2006 z dne 15. decembra 2006 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe pri pomoči de minimis [112] se lahko v skladu s členom 5(1) Uredbe uporablja za transportni sektor in podjetja, ki delujejo na področju predelave in trženja kmetijskih izdelkov, če pomoč izpolnjuje vse pogoje, določene v členih 1 in 2.
These Articles require limiting the amount of aid a beneficiary can receive to the maximum eligible amounts as stipulated under Article 2(2), i.e. EUR 200000 for undertakings active in the processing and marketing of agricultural products and EUR 100000 for the transport sector.
V skladu s tema dvema členoma je treba višino pomoči, ki jo lahko prejme upravičenec, omejiti na najvišje upravičene zneske, določene v členu 2(2), tj. 200000 EUR za podjetja, ki delujejo na področju predelave in trženja kmetijskih izdelkov, in 100000 EUR za podjetja, ki delujejo v transportnem sektorju.
Moreover, it requires excluding undertakings active in the processing and marketing of agricultural products, in cases:
Poleg tega ta uredba izključuje podjetja, ki delujejo na področju predelave in trženja kmetijskih izdelkov,
when the amount of the aid is fixed on the basis of the price or quantity of such products purchased from primary producers or put on the market by the undertakings concerned;
če je znesek pomoči določen na podlagi cene ali količine zadevnih izdelkov, ki so kupljeni od primarnih proizvajalcev ali jih zadevna podjetja dajo na trg;
when the aid is conditional on being partly or entirely passed on to primary producers.
če je pomoč pogojena s tem, da se delno ali v celoti prenese na primarne proizvajalce.
Finally, aid for the acquisition of road freight transport vehicles granted to undertakings performing road freight transport for hire or rewards must be excluded.
Nazadnje je treba izključiti tudi pomoči za nabavo vozil za cestni prevoz tovora, dodeljene podjetjem, ki opravljajo cestne prevoze blaga za najem ali plačilo.
The Law contains no provision limiting the amount of aid a beneficiary can receive.
Zakon ne vsebuje določbe, s katero bi bila omejena višina pomoči, ki jo lahko prejme upravičenec.
Furthermore, the provisions of Article 1 and 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006 are not respected.
Poleg tega nista upoštevani določbi člena 1 in 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 1998/2006.
It follows that the scheme does not comply with the conditions of the Regulations.
Iz tega sledi, da shema ne izpolnjuje pogojev, ki jih določa Uredba.
Compatibility under RAG
Skladnost na podlagi smernic RAG
The measure should first be examined on the basis of the RAG.
Ukrep je treba najprej preučiti na podlagi smernic RAG.
Primary production of agricultural products listed in Annex I of the Treaty, the fisheries sector and coal industry are excluded from the scope of application of the RAG.
Primarna proizvodnja kmetijskih izdelkov, naštetih v Prilogi I k Pogodbi, ribiški sektor in premogovništvo so izključeni s področja uporabe smernic RAG.
However, under this measure agricultural production is eligible for aid within two sectors, intensive agriculture and fishery, as well as agricultural and agro-industrial cooperatives.
V skladu s tem ukrepom pa je kmetijska proizvodnja v dveh sektorjih, intenzivnem kmetijstvu in ribištvu, ter kmetijska proizvodnja kmetijskih in živilskopredelovalnih zadrug upravičena do pomoči.
Moreover, coal mining can be supported within the sectors mining, quarrying and treating of minerals or marble.
Poleg tega se premogovništvo lahko finančno podpre v okviru sektorjev rudarstvo, kamnolomstvo in kamnoseštvo ter obdelava mineralov ali marmorja.
Consequently, in any case, aid in these sectors cannot be justified under the RAG.
Zato se pomoč v teh sektorjih nikakor ne more upravičiti na podlagi smernic RAG.
Under RAG, aid can be allowed subject to various conditions both for initial investment and higher operating costs.
Na podlagi smernic RAG se lahko pomoč pod različnimi pogoji dovoli za začetno naložbo in višje stroške poslovanja.
This Law does not clarify which of the two would be applicable.
Iz zakona ni jasno, katero od obeh meril bi se lahko uporabljalo.
Firstly, following point 4.4 RAG the initial investment must concern fixed capital relating to the setting-up of a new establishment, extension of existing establishment or starting up a new activity, or purchase of an establishment, which has closed or would have been closed had it not been purchased, but which does not belong to a firm in difficulty.
Prvič, v skladu s točko 4.4 smernic RAG se mora začetna naložba nanašati na osnovna sredstva, povezana z ustanovitvijo nove ustanove, širitvijo obstoječe ustanove ali začetkom nove dejavnosti ali nakupom ustanove, ki je bila zaprta ali bi bila zaprta, če ne bi bila kupljena, in ne pripada podjetju v težavah.
The Commission does not consider the eligible investment expenditures under this measure to respect this definition and thus to qualify as initial investment.
Po mnenju Komisije upravičeni odhodki za naložbe na podlagi tega ukrepa ne izpolnjujejo pogojev te opredelitve in zato tudi ne pogojev za začetno naložbo.
Replacement investment is not excluded from the eligible investment projects, for example where the projects concern means of transportation within the greater plant area and for personnel, computers, furniture and equipment, access land works for mines or second-hand trucks.
Nadomestna naložba ni izključena iz upravičenih investicijskih projektov, na primer, če se projekti nanašajo na prevozna sredstva znotraj večjega območja tovarne ter za uslužbence, računalnike, pohištvo in opremo, zemeljska dela v rudarstvu ali rabljene tovornjake.
Investment into buildings and equipment intended for accommodation and social needs of workers does not seem to be a productive investment.
Naložbe v zgradbe in opremo, namenjeno za nastanitev in socialne potrebe zaposlenih, se ne zdijo produktivne.
In the sector of transport to landlocked inaccessible remote areas, projects related to transportation equipment include transport equipment into the standard basis, which is contrary to the RAG [113].
V sektorju prevoza na neobalna nedostopna oddaljena območja projekti, povezani z opremo za prevoz, vključujejo opremo za prevoz v standardni osnovi, kar je v nasprotju s smernicami RAG [113].
Purchase of software and further development of software up to 60 % of total investment exceeds the limit of 25 % of investment into intangible assets on top of the standard base.
Nakup programske opreme in nadaljnji razvoj programske opreme do 60 % celotne naložbe poleg standardne osnove presega mejo 25 % naložb v nematerialna sredstva.
Other conditions necessary for inclusion of software among the eligible costs are not imposed either [114].
Tudi drugi pogoji, ki morajo biti izpolnjeni, da se programska oprema lahko vključi med upravičene stroške, niso določeni [114].
Moreover, as software development constitutes the current business in the software development sector, it qualifies as operating expenditure in that sector.
Poleg tega razvoj programske opreme, ker pomeni tekoče poslovanje v sektorju razvoja programske opreme, izpolnjuje pogoje za stroške poslovanja v tem sektorju.
According to Article 3(2) of Law 2601/1998, investment aid can also be granted for activities outside Greece.
V skladu s členom 3(2) zakona 2601/1998 se pomoč za naložbe lahko dodeli tudi za dejavnosti zunaj Grčije.
However, this is not eligible under the RAG.
Vendar pa je to v nasprotju s smernicami RAG.
Furthermore, the maximum aid intensity, which in this measure is up to 37,05 % and 36,89 % of the eligible costs for 2004 and 2005 respectively, exceeds the maximum aid intensities as defined in the Regional Aid Map for Greece [115].
Poleg tega največja intenzivnost pomoči, ki za ta ukrep znaša do 37,05 % in 36,89 % upravičenih stroškov za leti 2004 oziroma 2005, presega največje intenzivnosti pomoči, določene v karti regionalnih pomoči za Grčijo [115].
In particular, it seems that in areas A and B according to the Greek Regional Aid Map the aid intensity ceilings for projects under Article 5 of the Law 2601/1998 (i.e. 35 %), those for any projects co-financed according to the Community Support Framework [116] (i.e. 35 %) and those for other projects (no regional aid provided for areas A, 18,4 % for Areas B) may be exceeded.
Zlasti se zdi, da bodo zgornje meje intenzivnosti pomoči na območjih A in B grške karte regionalnih pomoči lahko presežene za projekte v skladu s členom 5 zakona 2601/1998 (tj. 35 %), katere koli projekte, ki so sofinancirani v skladu z okvirom podpore Skupnosti [116] (tj. 35 %), in druge projekte (regionalna pomoč ni predvidena za območja A, 18,4 % je predvideno za območja B).
In areas C and D ceilings for the tourism projects (i.e. 33,2 %) and for other projects (35,1 %) may be exceeded.
Na območjih C in D bodo lahko presežene zgornje meje za turistične projekte (tj. 33,2 %) in druge projekte (35,1 %).
The measure does not contain the obligation to maintain the initial investment for at least five years, as required by point 4.10 of the RAG.
Ukrep ne vsebuje obveznosti ohranitve začetne naložbe za obdobje vsaj pet let, kot je določeno v točki 4.10 smernic RAG.
Secondly, following point 4.15 of the RAG operating aid can be exceptionally justified in terms of its contributions to regional development, where its level is proportional to the handicaps it seeks to alleviate.
Drugič, pomoč za tekoče poslovanje v skladu s točko 4.15 smernic RAG je lahko izjemoma upravičena zaradi svojega prispevka k regionalnemu razvoju, če je njena višina sorazmerna razvojnim problemom, ki jih želi ublažiti.
However, the Commission did not receive any such indications and has serious doubts that this very broad measure covering the entire territory of Greece and many widely defined sectors can tackle specific regional handicaps.
Vendar pa Komisija ni prejela takih podatkov in ima resne pomisleke glede tega, da lahko ta zelo široki ukrep, ki pokriva celotno ozemlje Grčije in številne široko opredeljene sektorje, reši posebne regionalne razvojne probleme.
Therefore, the Commission notes that the scheme as a whole, which does not respect the scope, the definition of initial investment and the aid intensity, is incompatible under the RAG.
Zato Komisija ugotavlja, da shema kot celota, ki ne upošteva obsega, opredelitve začetne naložbe in intenzivnosti pomoči, ni skladna na podlagi smernic RAG.
Moreover, no individual aid granted under the scheme was from the beginning coupled with a legal obligation to maintain the initial investment for at least five years in the assisted region.
Poleg tega ni bila nobena posamezna pomoč, dodeljena na podlagi sheme, že od začetka povezana z zakonsko obveznostjo ohranitve začetne naložbe za obdobje vsaj pet let v regiji, ki prejema pomoč.
No individual aid operating aid was from the beginning justified.
Nobena posamezna pomoč za tekoče poslovanje ni bila upravičena že na samem začetku.
Hence no individual aid granted under this scheme can be considered as compatible under the RAG.
Zato se nobena posamezna pomoč, dodeljena na podlagi te sheme, ne more šteti za skladno na podlagi smernic RAG.
Compatibility under MSF (2002)
Skladnost na podlagi okvira MSF (2002)
Consequently, the Commission notes that the measure does not respect the above mentioned conditions of the MSF, and hence, is incompatible under the MSF.
Zato Komisija ugotavlja, da ukrep ne izpolnjuje zgoraj omenjenih pogojev okvira MSF in tako ni skladen na podlagi okvira MSF.
Furthermore, in order to be compatible with the MSF (2002), the scheme must comply with the RAG.
Poleg tega mora shema, da je lahko skladna na podlagi okvira MSF (2002), izpolnjevati pogoje smernic RAG.
However, this is not the case as shown in the previous part.
Kot je bilo prikazano v prejšnjem poglavju, shema teh pogojev ne izpolnjuje.
In particular, no individual aid granted under the scheme was from the outset coupled with a legal obligation to maintain the initial investment for at least five years in the assisted region.
Zlasti ni bila nobena posamezna pomoč, dodeljena na podlagi sheme, od začetka povezana z zakonsko obveznostjo ohranitve začetne naložbe za obdobje vsaj pet let v regiji, ki prejema pomoč.
Hence no individual aid granted under this scheme can be considered as compatible under the MSF (2002).
Zato se nobena posamezna pomoč, dodeljena na podlagi te sheme, ne more šteti za skladno na podlagi okvira MSF (2002).
Compatibility under the Rescue and Restructuring aid Guidelines
Skladnost na podlagi smernic o pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje
The Greek Authorities explained that the measure did not apply to undertakings in difficulties.
Grški organi so pojasnili, da ukrep ni veljal za podjetja v težavah.
In fact, it could have been only used by profit making companies.
Dejansko so ga lahko uporabljala samo dobičkonosna podjetja.
Therefore the compatibility of this scheme under the Rescue and Restructuring aid Guidelines is excluded.
Zato je skladnost te sheme na podlagi smernic o pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje izključena.
Hence, no individual aid granted under this scheme may be declared compatible under these guidelines.
Zato se nobena posamezna pomoč, dodeljena na podlagi te sheme, ne more razglasiti za skladno na podlagi teh smernic.
Compatibility under the Environmental Guidelines
Skladnost na podlagi okoljskih smernic
The Commission also assessed whether the aid for some projects could be found to be compatible with the Environmental Guidelines.
Komisija je tudi ocenila, ali bi se za pomoč za nekatere projekte lahko ugotovilo, da je skladna na podlagi okoljskih smernic.
The following investments could be assessed under the Environmental Guidelines: environmentally motivated investment [117], introduction and adaptation of environmental technologies, investment in renewable energy, combined production for electric power and heat (CHP) and energy saving, as well as the establishment and expansion of recycling facilities.
Komisija je na podlagi okoljskih smernic lahko ocenila naslednje naložbe: naložbe v okoljske namene [117], uvedbo in prilagoditev okoljskih tehnologij, naložbe v obnovljive energetske vire, soproizvodnjo toplote in električne energije (SPTE), varčevanje z energijo ter vzpostavitev in nadgradnjo naprav za recikliranje.
Point 28 of the Environmental Guidelines allows the granting of investment aid to SMEs within a period of three years from the adoption of new compulsory Community standards.
V skladu s točko 28 okoljskih smernic je pomoč za naložbe mogoče dodeliti malim ali srednje velikim podjetjem v treh letih po sprejetju novih obveznih standardov Skupnosti.
This scheme does not link the aid to the introduction of new Community standards and it does not clearly define investment costs.
Ta shema pomoči ne povezuje z uvedbo novih standardov Skupnosti in ne opredeljuje jasno stroškov naložb.
Point 29 of the Environmental Guidelines allows the granting of investment aid, if that enables undertakings to reach environmental standards beyond the Community standards.
V skladu s točko 29 okoljskih smernic je pomoč za naložbe mogoče dodeliti, če to podjetjem omogoči, da dosežejo okoljske standarde, višje od standardov Skupnosti.
This scheme does not condition the aid with reaching standards beyond the Community standards and it does not clearly define investment costs.
Ta shema pomoči ne pogojuje z doseganjem standardov, višjih od standardov Skupnosti, in ne opredeljuje jasno stroškov naložb.
Point 30 of the Environmental Guidelines allows the granting of investment aid into energy savings.
V skladu s točko 30 okoljskih smernic je pomoč za naložbe mogoče dodeliti za prihranke energije.
This scheme does not clearly define investment costs.
Ta shema ne opredeljuje jasno stroškov naložb.
Point 31 of the Environmental Guidelines allows the granting of investment aid to the combined production of electric power and heat, if the conversion efficiency is particularly high.
V skladu s točko 31 okoljskih smernic je pomoč za naložbe mogoče dodeliti za kombinirano proizvodnjo toplote in električne energije, če je pretvorbena učinkovitost posebej velika.
This scheme does not condition the aid with particularly high conversion efficiency, does not clearly define investment costs and may not respect the relevant maximum aid intensities given in the guidelines.
Ta shema pomoči ne pogojuje s posebej veliko pretvorbeno učinkovitostjo, ne opredeljuje jasno stroškov naložb in nujno ne upošteva ustreznih največjih intenzivnosti pomoči iz smernic.
Point 32 of the Environmental Guidelines allows the granting of investment aid to promote renewable sources of energy in the absence of mandatory Community standards.
V skladu s točko 32 okoljskih smernic je pomoč za naložbe mogoče dodeliti za spodbujanje obnovljivih virov energije, če ni obveznih standardov Skupnosti.
This scheme, however, does not provide a clear definition of renewable energy sources and therefore it is not clear to what extent point 32 of the guidelines are applicable.
Vendar pa v tej shemi obnovljivi viri energije niso jasno opredeljeni, zato ni jasno, v kolikšnem obsegu se uporablja točka 32 smernic.
Moreover, the scheme does not clearly define investment costs and it is not clear whether the relevant maximum aid intensities are being respected.
Poleg tega shema ne opredeljuje jasno stroškov naložb in ni jasno, ali upošteva ustrezne največje intenzivnosti pomoči.
Even if the investment were eligible under this point, Greece has not demonstrated that the eligible cost would comply with the conditions of points 36 and 37 of the Environmental Guidelines, which define the underlining investments and the eligible costs.
Tudi če bi bila naložba v skladu s to točko upravičena, Grčija ni pokazala, da upravičeni stroški izpolnjujejo pogoje iz točk 36 in 37 okoljskih smernic, ki opredeljujeta zadevne naložbe in upravičene stroške.
Point 38 of the Environmental Guidelines allows the granting of aid for the rehabilitation of polluted industrial sites, where the person responsible for the pollution is not identified or cannot be made to bear the cost.
V skladu s točko 38 okoljskih smernic je pomoč mogoče dodeliti za sanacijo onesnaženih industrijskih predelov, kadar oseba, ki je odgovorna za onesnaženje, ni znana ali se ji stroški ne morejo naložiti.
This scheme does not condition the aid with the person responsible for the pollution is not identified or cannot be made to bear the cost.
Ta shema pomoči ne pogojuje s tem, da mora biti oseba, ki je odgovorna za onesnaženje, neznana, ali s tem, da se ji stroški ne morejo naložiti.
Point 39 of the Environmental Guidelines allows the granting of investment aid if firms established in an urban area or in a Natura 2000 designated area lawfully carry on activities that create major pollution and must, on account of this location move from its place of establishment to a more suitable area.
V skladu s točko 39 okoljskih smernic je pomoč za naložbe mogoče dodeliti, če podjetje, ustanovljeno v mestnem okolju ali na območju v okviru programa Natura 2000, zakonito opravlja dejavnosti, ki povzročajo večje onesnaževanje, in se mora zaradi takšne lokacije preseliti na bolj primerno območje.
Thereby the change of location must be dictated on environmental protection grounds and must have been ordered by administrative or judicial decision and the firm must comply with the strictest environmental standards applicable in the new region where it is located.
Pri tem mora biti vzrok za spremembo lokacije varstvo okolja, spremembo je treba odrediti z upravno ali sodno odločbo, podjetje pa mora izpolnjevati najstrožje okoljske standarde, ki se uporabljajo na njegovi novi lokaciji.
The aid intensity may be maximum 30 %, or 40 % for SMEs, of the eligible costs.
Intenzivnost pomoči je lahko največ 30 % upravičenih stroškov ali 40 % upravičenih stroškov za mala ali srednje velika podjetja.
Eligible costs are those connected with purchase of land or the construction or purchase of new plant of the same capacity as the plant abandoned, less any benefits deriving from the relocation.
Upravičeni stroški so stroški, povezani z nakupom zemljišča ali gradnjo ali nakupom novega obrata enake zmogljivosti, kot je bila zmogljivost zapuščenega obrata, brez kakršnih koli ugodnosti, ki so posledica preselitve.
Any cost savings or benefits accruing from an increase in capacity for the first five years of operation, or costs for a technically comparable investment that does not provide the same degree of environmental protection would have to be deducted from eligible costs of the investment aid.
Kakršne koli prihranke stroškov ali ugodnosti, ki so posledica večje zmogljivosti v prvih petih letih delovanja, ali stroške tehnično primerljive naložbe, ki ne zagotavlja enake ravni varstva okolja, bi bilo treba odšteti od upravičenih stroškov pomoči za naložbe.
However, this scheme does not provide any such reductions of eligible costs.
Vendar pa ta shema ne predvideva takih znižanj upravičenih stroškov.
This scheme does not condition the aid with the above mentioned restrictions with the obligation to relocate and the eligible costs.
Ta shema pomoči ne pogojuje z navedenimi omejitvami, tj. z obveznostjo preselitve in upravičenimi stroški.