natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Odločba je naslovljena na države članice.
Decision as amended by Decision 2007/218/EC (OJ L 95, 5.4.2007, p. 37).
Odločba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo 2007/218/ES (UL L 95, 5.4.2007, str. 37).
Annual indicative breakdown by Member State for the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013 of the commitment appropriations for the regions eligible for funding from the EFF after separating out the amount devoted for technical assistance at the initiative of/and on behalf of the Commission
Okvirna letna razčlenitev odobritev za prevzem obveznosti po državah članicah za obdobje od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2013 za regije, upravičene do financiranja iz ESR, po odštetju zneska, namenjenega tehnični pomoči na pobudo in/ali v imenu Komisije
Annual indicative breakdown by Member State for the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013 of the commitment appropriations for the regions eligible for funding from the EFF under the non-Convergence objective (current prices)
Okvirna letna razčlenitev odobritev za prevzem obveznosti po državah članicah za obdobje od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2013 za regije, upravičene do financiranja iz ESR v okviru nekonvergenčnega cilja (tekoče cene)
Annual indicative breakdown by Member State of the commitment appropriations for the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013 for the regions eligible for funding from the EFF under the Convergence objective (current prices)
Okvirna letna razčlenitev odobritev za prevzem obveznosti po državah članicah za obdobje od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2013 za regije, upravičene do financiranja iz ESR v okviru konvergenčnega cilja (tekoče cene)
Annual indicative breakdown by Member State for the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013 of the total commitment appropriations from the EFF (current prices)
Okvirna letna razčlenitev skupnih odobritev za prevzem obveznosti iz ESR po državah članicah za obdobje od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2013 (tekoče cene)
concerning the financial contribution by the Community, for the year 2008, towards a study covering the area of animal transport
v zvezi s finančnim prispevkom Skupnosti za leto 2008 za izvedbo študije na področju prevoza živali
Decision 90/424/EEC lays down the procedures governing the Community's financial contribution towards specific veterinary measures.
Odločba 90/424/EGS določa postopke, ki urejajo finančni prispevek Skupnosti za posebne veterinarske ukrepe.
In particular, the Community may avail itself of studies necessary for the development of Community veterinary legislation in the field of animal welfare.
Skupnost lahko zlasti uporablja študije, potrebne za razvoj veterinarske zakonodaje Skupnosti na področju dobrega počutja živali.
Studies, impact assessments and evaluations covering the areas of animal health, animal welfare and food safety will also support the actions identified in the Community Action Plan on the Protection and Welfare of Animals 2006-2010 [2].
Študije, ocene učinka in ocene s področja zdravja živali, dobrega počutja živali in varnosti živil bodo poleg tega v podporo ukrepom iz akcijskega načrta Skupnosti za zaščito in dobro počutje živali 2006–2010 [2].
This Action Plan identified several areas of action in particular the upgrading of existing minimum standards for animal protection and welfare and introducing standardised animal welfare indicators.
V tem akcijskem načrtu je bilo opredeljenih več področij ukrepanja, zlasti nadgradnja obstoječih minimalnih standardov za zaščito in dobro počutje živali ter uvedba standardiziranih kazalnikov dobrega počutja živali.
Concerning animal transport, advice from scientific experts indicates that new appropriate rules on travelling times and loading densities are needed.
Glede prevoza živali so po mnenju znanstvenih izvedencev potrebna nova ustrezna pravila o potovalnih časih in gostoti natovarjanja.
In order to perform an Impact Assessment, and in particular in order to evaluate the animal welfare and health, public health, economic, social, environmental or administrative impacts that an amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 of 22 December 2004 on the protection of animals during transport and related operations and amending Directives 64/432/EEC and 93/119/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 [3] as regards travelling times and space allowances is likely to provoke, a study is needed.
Potrebna je študija za izvedbo ocene učinka, zlasti z vidika dobrega počutja in zdravja živali, javnega zdravja ter gospodarskih, socialnih, okoljskih in upravnih posledic, ki ga bo predvidoma imela sprememba Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2005 z dne 22. decembra 2004 o zaščiti živali med prevozom in postopki, povezanimi z njim, in o spremembi Direktiv 64/432/EGS in 93/119/ES ter Uredbe (ES) št. 1255/97 [3] v zvezi s potovalnimi časi in dodeljenim prostorom.
It is therefore appropriate for the Community to fund for the year 2008 a study which is to evaluate the different policy options linked to identified scenarios as regards travelling times and space allowances for the transported animals and to assess their respective animal welfare and health, public health, economic, social, environmental and administrative impacts.
Zato je primerno, da Skupnost v letu 2008 financira študijo, s katero je treba oceniti različne možne politike v zvezi s potovalnimi časi in dodeljevanjem prostora pri prevozu živali, in pri tem oceniti njihov učinek na dobro počutje in zdravje živali, javno zdravje ter njihove gospodarske, socialne okoljske in upravne učinke.
The maximum amount to be allocated to this action should be specified.
Treba je določiti najvišji znesek za financiranje tega ukrepa.
The action will be performed by a service contract in accordance with procurement procedures for negotiated procedures as laid down in Article 91(1)(d) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [4] and Articles 126 and 129(1) of Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5].
Ta ukrep se bo izvajal na podlagi pogodbe o izvajanju v skladu s postopki javnih naročil za postopke s pogajanjem, kot je določeno v členu 91(1)(d) Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [4] ter členih 126 in 129(1) Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 z dne 23. decembra 2002 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [5].
A Community financial contribution for the performance of a study on travelling times and space allowances during animal transport up to a maximum of EUR 58000 is hereby approved.
Odobren je finančni prispevek Skupnosti v višini največ 58000 EUR za izvedbo študije o potovalnih časih in dodeljevanju prostora pri prevozu živali.
The granting of the contribution referred to in Article 1 shall be governed by public procurement rules and shall be carried out through a negotiated procedure according to Article 91(1)(d) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002.
Dodelitev prispevka iz člena 1 urejajo pravila javnih naročil in se izvaja s postopki s pogajanjem v skladu s členom 91(1)(d) Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002.
The financial contribution provided for in Article 1 shall be financed through the budget line 17 04 02 01 of the budget of the European Communities for 2008.
Finančni prispevek iz člena 1 se financira iz proračunske postavke 17 04 02 01 proračuna Evropskih skupnosti za leto 2008.
OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1 as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1525/2007 (OJ L 343, 27.12.2007, p. 9).
UL L 248, 16.9.2002, str. 1, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1525/2007 (UL L 343, 27.12.2007, str. 9).
OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 1 as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 478/2007 (OJ L 111, 28.4.2007, p. 13).
UL L 357, 31.12.2002, str. 1, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 478/2007 (UL L 111, 28.4.2007, str. 13).
of 29 August 2008
z dne 29. avgusta 2008
declaring operational the Regional Advisory Council for Mediterranean Sea under the Common Fisheries Policy
o razglasitvi začetka delovanja regionalnega svetovalnega sveta za Sredozemsko morje v okviru skupne ribiške politike
Having regard to the recommendation transmitted by Italy on 16 May 2008 on behalf of Spain, France, Greece, Malta, Slovenia and Cyprus,
ob upoštevanju priporočila, ki ga je 16. maja 2008 poslala Italija v imenu Španije, Francije, Grčije, Malte, Slovenije in Cipra,
Article 2 of Decision 2004/585/EC establishes a Regional Advisory Council to cover the Mediterranean Sea.
Člen 2 Sklepa 2004/585/ES vzpostavlja regionalni svetovalni svet za Sredozemsko morje.
In accordance with Article 3(1) of Decision 2004/585/EC, representatives of the fisheries sector and other interests groups submitted a request concerning the operation of that Regional Advisory Council to Greece, Spain, France, Cyprus, Malta, and Slovenia.
V skladu s členom 3(1) Sklepa 2004/585/ES so predstavniki ribiškega sektorja in drugih interesnih skupin Grčiji, Španiji, Franciji, Cipru, Malti in Sloveniji predložili zahtevo glede delovanja navedenega regionalnega svetovalnega sveta.
As required by Article 3(2) of Decision 2004/585/EC, the Member States concerned determined whether the application concerning the Regional Advisory Council for the Mediterranean Sea was in conformity with the provisions laid down in that Decision.
Kakor določa člen 3(2) Sklepa 2004/585/ES, so zadevne države članice odločile, ali je vloga regionalnega svetovalnega sveta za Sredozemsko morje v skladu z določbami navedenega sklepa.
On 16 May 2008, the Member States concerned transmitted a recommendation on that Regional Advisory Council to the Commission.
Zadevne države članice so 16. maja 2008 Komisiji poslale priporočilo glede navedenega regionalnega svetovalnega sveta.
The Commission has evaluated the application by the interested parties and the recommendation in the light of Decision 2004/585/EC and the aims and principles of the Common Fisheries Policy, and considers that the Regional Advisory Council for the Mediterranean Sea is ready to become operational,
Komisija je ocenila vlogo zainteresiranih strank in priporočilo glede na Sklep 2004/585/ES ter cilje in načela skupne ribiške politike in meni, da je regionalni svetovalni svet za Sredozemsko morje pripravljen na začetek delovanja –
The Regional Advisory Council for the Mediterranean Sea, established by Article 2(1)(b) of Decision 2004/585/EC, shall be operational as from 15 September 2008.
Regionalni svetovalni svet za Sredozemsko morje, ustanovljen s členom 2(1)(b) Sklepa 2004/585/ES, začne delovati s 15. septembrom 2008.
Done at Brussels, 29 August 2008.
V Bruslju, 29. avgusta 2008
Decision as amended by Decision 2007/409/EC (OJ L 155, 15.6.2007, p. 68).
Sklep, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom 2007/409/ES (UL L 155, 15.6.2007, str. 68).
amending the Commission Decision of 10 May 2007 on the measures C 1/06 (ex NN 103/05) implemented by Spain for Chupa Chups
o spremembi Odločbe Komisije z dne 10. maja 2007 o ukrepih C 1/06 (ex NN 103/05) Španija za Chupa Chups
(notified under document number C(2008) 868)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 868)
Having regard to the Community Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulties [1],
ob upoštevanju Smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah [1],
The Commission adopted a decision on 10 May 2007 on the measures C 1/06 (ex NN 103/05) implemented by Spain for Chupa Chups [2].
Komisija je 10. maja 2007 sprejela odločbo o ukrepih C 1/06 (ex NN 103/05) Španija za Chupa Chups [2].
Following an appeal lodged by Chupa Chups S.A. (Chupa Chups) before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities against the decision in question, the Commission concluded that it had committed an error of assessment as regards one part of measure 4 (EUR 800000 granted in 2003 under a regional aid scheme).
Po pritožbi, ki jo je podjetje Chupa Chups S.A. (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Chupa Chups“) vložilo pri Sodišču prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti proti zadevni odločbi, je Komisija sklenila, da je sprejela napačno oceno v zvezi z delom ukrepa 4 (800000 EUR, dodeljenih leta 2003 na podlagi sheme regionalne pomoči).
In point 43 of the contested decision, the Commission noted that it had been made clear that the regional aid scheme could not apply to companies in difficulties.
V točki 43 sporne odločbe je Komisija navedla, da je bilo jasno izraženo, da se shema regionalne pomoči ne more uporabljati za podjetja v težavah.
Given the heavy losses incurred by Chupa Chups in 2002 (EUR 22078000, corresponding to 86,5 % of the subscribed capital at the end of the financial year) and the 2003 results, the Commission considered that Chupa Chups had to be regarded as a company in difficulties at the time the aid was granted.
Glede na hude izgube podjetja Chupa Chups v letu 2002 (22078000 EUR, kar je enako 86,5 % vpisanega kapitala ob koncu finančnega leta) in glede na rezultate iz leta 2003 je Komisija menila, da je treba podjetje Chupa Chups šteti kot podjetje v težavah, ko je bila pomoč dodeljena.
The Commission concluded that this part of the aid was thus incompatible with the common market and could therefore not be implemented.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je bil ta del pomoči torej nezdružljiv s skupnim trgom in zato ni mogel biti izveden.
Concerning the EUR 800000 of regional aid granted in 2003 under the ‘Minería 2’ programme, the Commission notes that this aid forms part of an approved aid scheme [3].
V zvezi z 800000 EUR regionalne pomoči, dodeljene leta 2003 v okviru programa „Minería 2“, Komisija opozarja, da je ta pomoč del odobrene sheme pomoči [3].
Furthermore, contrary to its first assessment at the initiation of the formal investigation procedure, the Commission considers that Chupa Chups was eligible for this aid since, at the time the aid was granted, the company was not in difficulties [4].
Poleg tega v nasprotju s svojo prvo oceno ob sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave Komisija meni, da je bilo podjetje Chupa Chups do te pomoči upravičeno, saj podjetje takrat, ko je bila pomoč dodeljena, ni bilo v težavah [4].
the Commission considers that many of the usual signs of a firm in difficulty, as described in point 6 of the guidelines, were not present in the period 2002-2003.
Komisija meni, da veliko običajnih znakov podjetij v težavah, ki so opisani v točki 6 Smernic, v obdobju 2002–2003 ni bilo prisotnih.
In particular, the rate of losses diminished [5], as did debts (both long- and short-term) and stock inventories [6], whereas financial expenses remained stable;
Znižala se je zlasti raven izgub [5], dolgov (dolgo- in kratkoročnih) in vrednost zalog [6], finančni stroški pa so ostali stabilni;
finally, Chupa Chups’ positive evolution since 2002-2003 has made it apparent that the company did not fall under the general criterion in point 4 of the guidelines, according to which a firm is to be regarded as being in difficulty ‘where it is unable, whether through its own resources or with the funds it is able to obtain from its owner/shareholders or creditors, to stem losses which, without outside intervention by the public authorities, will almost certainly condemn it to going out of business in the short or medium term’.
nazadnje je iz pozitivnega razvoja podjetja Chupa Chups od obdobja 2002–2003 razvidno, da ne spada pod splošno merilo iz točke 4 Smernic, v skladu s katerim je se šteje, da je podjetje v težavah, „ko ni zmožno z lastnimi sredstvi ali sredstvi, ki jih lahko pridobi od svojih lastnikov/delničarjev ali upnikov, ustaviti negativna gibanja poslovanja, ki bi brez posredovanja države ogrozili obstoj podjetja.“
The EUR 800000 subsidy granted to Chupa Chups under this regional aid scheme must therefore be deemed to constitute compatible aid.
Torej se mora šteti, da je subvencija v znesku 800000 EUR, ki je bila dodeljena podjetju Chupa Chups v okviru te regionalne sheme, združljiva pomoč.
In the appeal, it is argued that Chupa Chups was not a company in difficulties within the meaning of point 5(a) of the 1999 Community Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty [7].
V pritožbi je navedeno, da podjetje Chupa Chups ni bilo podjetje v težavah v smislu točke 5(a) Smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah iz leta 1999 [7].
In the Guidelines, a firm is regarded as being in difficulty where more than half of its registered capital has disappeared and more than one quarter of that capital has been lost over the preceding 12 months.
V Smernicah se šteje, da je podjetje v težavah, „če je več kakor polovica registriranega osnovnega kapitala izgubljena in je bila več kakor četrtina takšnega kapitala izgubljena v zadnjih dvanajstih mesecih.“
Even if Chupa Chups had losses corresponding to more than half of its subscribed capital, the criterion that more than half of the subscribed capital has disappeared is not met in this case, because Chupa Chups had other reserves.
Čeprav so izgube podjetja Chupa Chups znašale več kot polovico njegovega vpisanega kapitala, merilo, da je bila izgubljena več kot polovica vpisanega kapitala, v tej zadevi ni izpolnjeno, ker je imelo podjetje Chupa Chups druge rezerve.
The Commission must therefore reconsider its assessment and amend the Decision of 10 May 2007 as regards the assessment of the aid of EUR 800000 envisaged in measure 4.
Komisija mora zato ponovno proučiti svojo oceno in spremeniti Odločbo z dne 10. maja 2007 v zvezi z oceno pomoči v znesku 800000 EUR, predvideno v ukrepu 4.
The Decision of 10 May 2007 on the measures C 1/06 (ex NN 103/05) implemented by Spain for Chupa Chups must therefore be amended,
Odločbo z dne 10. maja 2007 o ukrepih C 1/06 (ex NN 103/05) Španija za Chupa Chups je torej treba spremeniti –
Article 1(2) of the Decision of 10 May 2007 on the measures C 1/06 (ex NN 103/05) implemented by Spain for Chupa Chups is replaced by the following:
Člen 1(2) Odločbe z dne 10. maja 2007 o ukrepih C 1/06 (ex NN 103/05) Španija za Chupa Chups se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The State aid of EUR 800000 of regional aid granted in 2003 under the “Minería 2” programme is compatible with the common market.’
Državna pomoč v višini 800000 EUR regionalne pomoči, dodeljene leta 2003 v okviru programa ‚Minería 2‘, je združljiva s skupnim trgom.“
OJ L 244, 19.9.2007, p. 20.
UL L 244, 19.9.2007, str. 20.
Notified on 11 May 2007 under number C(2007) 1710.
Notificirano dne 11. maja 2007 pod številko C(2007) 1710.
Order of 17 December 2001 laying down the regulatory bases for granting aid for business projects that generate employment and promote alternative development of mining areas.
Orden de 17 de diciembre de 2001 por la que se establecen las bases reguladoras para la concesión de ayudas dirigidas a proyectos empresariales generadores de empleo, que promuevan el desarrollo alternativo de las zonas mineras.
The ‘Mineria 2’ programme was approved by the Commission on 27 November 2001 (letter C(2001) 3628).
Program „Mineria 2“ je Komisija odobrila 27. novembra 2001 (dopis C(2001) 3628).
Within the meaning of the 1999 Community Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty.
V smislu Smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah iz leta 1999.
EUR 22,07 million in 2002 and EUR 4,70 million in 2003.
22,07 milijona EUR v letu 2002 in 4,70 milijona EUR v letu 2003.
EUR 28,7 million in 2002 and EUR 23,29 million in 2003.
28,7 milijona EUR v letu 2002 in 23,29 milijona EUR v letu 2003.
despite the heavy losses of EUR 22078000 incurred in 2002, at the end of that financial year Chupa Chups accounts still showed reserves of around EUR 59930000.
kljub hudim izgubam v višini 22078000 EUR v letu 2002 je bilo konec navedenega finančnega leta na računih podjetja Chupa Chups še vedno približno 59930000 EUR rezerv.
Those reserves were sufficient to absorb all the losses, which therefore had no impact on the company’s subscribed capital of EUR 12 million. Moreover, after deduction of the 2002 losses, Chupa Chups still had equity of EUR 49850000;
Te rezerve so zadostovale za pokritje vseh izgub, ki zato niso imele nikakršnega vpliva na vpisani kapital podjetja, ki je znašal 12 milijonov EUR. Poleg tega je po obračunu izgub iz leta 2002 podjetje Chupa Chups še vedno imelo 49850000 EUR lastniškega kapitala;
of 16 April 2008
z dne 16. aprila 2008
on State Aid C 13/07 (ex NN 15/06 and N 734/06) implemented by Italy for New Interline
o državni pomoči št. C 13/07 (ex NN 15/06 in N 734/06) Italije za New Interline
(notified under document number C(2008) 1321)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 1321)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments [1] pursuant to those provisions,
po pozivu zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo pripombe [1] v skladu s temi določbami,
By letter of 23 February 2006 the Italian authorities notified the Commission of rescue aid to New Interline S.p.A.
Z dopisom z dne 23. februarja 2006 so italijanski organi Komisijo obvestili o pomoči za reševanje, ki je bila dodeljena podjetju New Interline S.p.A.
(New Interline).
(„New Interline“).
The measure, registered as case NN 15/06, was put into effect on 13 February 2006, i.e. before the notification.
Ukrep, v sodni register vpisan kot primer NN 15/06, je začel veljati 13. februarja 2006, tj. pred uradno priglasitvijo.
The Commission requested additional information by letter dated 4 April 2006, to which Italy replied by letter dated 29 May 2006.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 4. aprila 2006 zahtevala dodatne informacije in Italija je odgovorila z dopisom z dne 29. maja 2006.
The Commission requested further information by letter dated 28 July 2006, to which Italy replied by letters dated 5 October 2006 and 6 November 2006.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 28. julija 2006 zahtevala nadaljnje informacije in Italija je odgovorila z dopisoma z dne 5. oktobra 2006 in 6. novembra 2006.
With notification of 10 November 2006, registered as N 734/06, the Italian authorities notified the Commission of a restructuring plan for New Interline.
Z uradno priglasitvijo z dne 10. novembra 2006, evidentirano kot N 734/06, so italijanski organi obvestili Komisijo o načrtu za prestrukturiranje podjetja New Interline.
The Commission requested further information by letter dated 22 December 2006, to which Italy replied by letter dated 6 March 2007.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 22. decembra 2006 zahtevala nadaljnje informacije in Italija je odgovorila z dopisom z dne 6. marca 2007.
By letter of 25 April 2007 the Commission informed Italy that by Decision of 24 April 2007 it had decided that the rescue aid Italy had granted to New Interline was compatible with the common market in so far as it was applied for six months.
Z dopisom z dne 25. aprila 2007 je Komisija obvestila Italijo, da je z odločitvijo z dne 24. aprila 2007 odločila, da je pomoč za reševanje, ki jo je Italija odobrila podjetju New Interline, združljiva s skupnim trgom, če se izvaja šest mesecev.
As regarded the extension of the rescue aid beyond the six month period, as well as the restructuring aid, the Commission had decided to initiate the formal investigation procedure under Article 88(2) Treaty.
Glede podaljšanja pomoči za reševanje po šestmesečnem obdobju in pomoči za prestrukturiranje se je Komisija odločila, da bo sprožila formalni postopek preiskave na podlagi člena 88(2) Pogodbe.
The Commission’s decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Odločitev Komisije je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The Commission called on interested parties to submit their comments.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane stranke, naj predložijo pripombe.
However, no communication was received from the interested parties.
Vendar pa zainteresirane stranke niso poslale nobene pripombe.