natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to prevent the spread of the disease and to help eradicate it as quickly as possible, the Community should contribute financially towards the eligible expenditure incurred by the Member State under the emergency measures taken to combat the disease, as provided for in Decision 90/424/EEC.
Da se prepreči širjenje bolezni in pripomore k njenemu čimprejšnjemu izkoreninjenju, mora Skupnost finančno prispevati k upravičenim izdatkom držav članic, nastalim zaradi sprejetja nujnih ukrepov v zvezi z bojem proti tej bolezni v skladu z Odločbo 90/424/EGS.
Commission Decision 2005/660/EC of 15 September 2005 concerning a financial contribution by the Community in the context of the emergency measures taken to combat bluetongue in Portugal in 2004 and 2005 [2] granted a financial contribution from the Community to Portugal towards the expenditure incurred under the emergency measures to combat bluetongue implemented in 2004 and 2005.
Z Odločbo Komisije 2005/660/ES z dne 15. septembra 2005 o finančnem prispevku Skupnosti v okviru izrednih ukrepov za boj proti bolezni modrikastega jezika na Portugalskem v letih 2004 in 2005 [2] je bil dodeljen finančni prispevek Skupnosti k izdatkom Portugalske v okviru izrednih ukrepov za boj proti bolezni modrikastega jezika, izvedenih leta 2004 in 2005.
That Decision 2005/660/EC provided for a first instalment of EUR 1000000 subject to the results of the Commission in situ inspections.
Z Odločbo 2005/660/ES je bilo na podlagi inšpekcijskih pregledov Komisije na kraju samem odobreno prvo plačilo v višini 1000000 EUR.
Pursuant to that Decision, the balance of the Community financial contribution is to be paid on the basis of the applications submitted by Portugal on 9 November 2005, 14 November 2005 and 28 April 2006.
V skladu z navedeno odločbo se preostali znesek finančnega prispevka Skupnosti določi na podlagi zahtevkov, ki jih je Portugalska predložila 9. novembra 2005, 14. novembra 2005 in 28. aprila 2006.
Commission Decision 2006/78/EC of 31 January 2006 concerning a financial contribution by the Community for the implementation of an epidemiological survey and bluetongue surveillance measures in the context of the emergency measures taken to combat bluetongue in Portugal in 2004 and 2005 [3] granted a financial contribution from the Community to Portugal towards the expenditure incurred under the emergency measures to combat bluetongue implemented in 2004 and 2005.
Z Odločbo Komisije 2006/78/ES z dne 31. januarja 2006 o finančnem prispevku Skupnosti za izvajanje epidemiološkega nadzora in nadzornih ukrepov glede bolezni modrikastega jezika v okviru izrednih ukrepov, sprejetih v boju proti tej bolezni v letih 2004 in 2005 [3] je bil dodeljen finančni prispevek Skupnosti za izdatke Portugalske v okviru izrednih ukrepov za boj proti bolezni modrikastega jezika, izvedenih leta 2004 in 2005.
That Decision 2006/78/EC provided for a first instalment of EUR 600000 subject to the results of the Commission’s on-the-spot checks.
Z Odločbo 2006/78/ES je bilo na podlagi inšpekcijskih pregledov Komisije na kraju samem odobreno prvo plačilo v višini 600000 EUR.
Pursuant to that Decision, the balance of the Community financial contribution is to be paid on the basis of the application submitted by Portugal on 31 March 2006.
V skladu z navedeno odločbo se preostali znesek finančnega prispevka Skupnosti določi na podlagi zahtevka, ki ga je Portugalska predložila 31. marca 2006.
In view of those considerations, the total amount of the Community’s financial contribution to the eligible expenditure incurred associated with the eradication and surveillance of bluetongue in Portugal in 2004 and 2005 should now be fixed.
Glede na navedeno je treba določiti skupni znesek finančnega prispevka Skupnosti za upravičene stroške v zvezi z ukrepi za izkoreninjenje in nadzor bolezni modrikastega jezika, ki jih je Portugalska izvedla leta 2004 in 2005.
The Commission’s observations, method of calculating the eligible expenditure and final conclusions were communicated to Portugal in letters dated 22 May 2007 and 10 December 2007.
Pripombe Komisije, metoda izračuna upravičenih izdatkov in končne ugotovitve so bili Portugalski sporočeni v dopisih z dne 22. maja 2007 in 10. decembra 2007.
Financial contribution from the Community to Portugal
Finančni prispevek Skupnosti za Portugalsko
The total Community financial contribution towards the expenditure associated with eradicating bluetongue in Portugal in 2004 and 2005 pursuant to Decision 2005/660/EC is fixed at EUR 645633,30.
Skupni finančni prispevek Skupnosti za izdatke v zvezi z izkoreninjenjem bolezni modrikastega jezika na Portugalskem leta 2004 in 2005 se v skladu z Odločbo 2005/660/ES določi v višini 645633,30 EUR.
The total Community financial contribution towards the expenditure associated with surveying bluetongue in Portugal in 2004 and 2005 pursuant to Decision 2006/78/EC is fixed at EUR 417410,02.
Skupni finančni prispevek Skupnosti za izdatke v zvezi z nadzorom bolezni modrikastega jezika na Portugalskem leta 2004 in 2005 se v skladu z Odločbo 2005/78/ES določi v višini 417410,02 EUR.
The balance of the Community financial contribution is fixed at EUR 1063043,32.
Preostali znesek finančnega prispevka Skupnosti se določi v višini 1063043,32 EUR.
OJ L 36, 8.2.2006, p. 45.
UL L 36, 8.2.2006, str. 45.
Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council
Odločba Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta
on the mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund in accordance with point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
o uporabi Solidarnostnega sklada EU v skladu s točko 26 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management [1], and in particular point 26 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju [1], še zlasti točke 26,
The European Union has created a European Union Solidarity Fund (‘the Fund’) to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters.
Evropska unija je ustanovila Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije („Sklad“), da bi pokazala svojo solidarnost prebivalstvu območij, ki so jih prizadele nesreče.
Greece submitted an application to mobilise the Fund, concerning a disaster caused by forest fires in August 2007.
Grčija je predložila vlogo za uporabo sklada v zvezi z nesrečo, ki so jo avgusta 2007 povzročili gozdni požari.
Slovenia submitted an application to mobilise the Fund, concerning a disaster caused by flooding in September 2007,
Slovenija je predložila vlogo za uporabo sklada v zvezi z nesrečo, ki so jo septembra 2007 povzročile poplave –
For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2008, the European Union Solidarity Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 98023212 in commitment and payment appropriations.
V okviru splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2008 se iz Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije zagotovi vsota 98023212 EUR v odobritvah za prevzem obveznosti.
Done at Strasbourg, 5 June 2008.
V Strasbourgu, 5. junija 2008
Agreement as last amended by Decision 2008/371/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 128, 16.5.2008, p. 8).
Sporazum, kakor je bil nazadnje spremenjen s Sklepom 2008/371/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 128, 16.5.2008, str. 8).
of 7 May 2008
z dne 7. maja 2008
concerning the provisional prohibition of the use and sale in Austria of genetically modified maize (Zea mays L. line T25) pursuant to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o začasni prepovedi uporabe in prodaje gensko spremenjene koruze (Zea mays L. linija T25) v Avstriji v skladu z Direktivo 2001/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(notified under document number C(2008) 1715)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 1715)
By Commission Decision 98/293/EC of 22 April 1998 concerning the placing on the market of genetically modified maize (Zea mays L. line T25), pursuant to Council Directive 90/220/EEC [2] it was decided that consent was to be given for the placing on the market of that product.
Z Odločbo Komisije 98/293/ES z dne 22. aprila 1998 o dajanju v promet gensko spremenjene koruze (Zea mays L. linija T25) na podlagi Direktive Sveta 90/220/EGS [2] je bilo sklenjeno, da se odobri dajanje v promet navedenega proizvoda.
On 3 August 1998 the French authorities granted such consent.
Francoski organi so 3. avgusta 1998 dali ustrezno soglasje.
The consent covers all uses of the product, namely import, processing into food and feed products and cultivation.
Soglasje zajema vse vrste uporabe proizvoda, tj. uvoz, predelavo v živila in krmo ter pridelavo.
Pursuant to Article 35(1) of Directive 2001/18/EC which replaced Council Directive 90/220/EEC [3], procedures in respect of notifications concerning the placing on the market of genetically modified organisms which have not been completed by 17 October 2002 are subject to Directive 2001/18/EC.
V skladu s členom 35(1) Direktive 2001/18/ES, ki je nadomestila Direktivo Sveta 90/220/EGS [3], veljajo za postopke v zvezi s priglasitvijo glede dajanja v promet gensko spremenjenih organizmov, ki niso bili zaključeni do 17. oktobra 2002, določbe Direktive 2001/18/ES.
On 8 May 2000 Austria informed the Commission of its decision to prohibit provisionally the use and sale of Zea mays L. line T25 for all uses and gave reasons for that decision in accordance with Article 16(1) of Directive 90/220/EEC.
Dne 8. maja 2000 je Avstrija v skladu s členom 16(1) Direktive 90/220/EGS obvestila Komisijo o svoji odločitvi, da začasno prepove uporabo in prodajo koruze Zea mays L. linija T25 za vse vrste uporabe in navedla razloge zanjo.
Products derived from Zea mays L. line T25 (starch and all its derivatives, crude and refined oil, all heat-processed or fermented products obtained from Zea mays L. line T25, as well as feed produced from Zea mays L. line T25) are authorised under Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4] and Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5].
Proizvodi iz koruze Zea mays L. linija T25 (škrob in vsi njegovi derivati, surovo in rafinirano olje, vsi toplotno obdelani ali fermentirani proizvodi, pridobljeni iz Zea mays L. linija T25 ter krma iz Zea mays L. linija T25) so dovoljeni v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 258/97 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] in Uredbo (ES) št. 1829/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5].
These uses are not subject to the safeguard clause notified by Austria.
Za te uporabe ne velja zaščitna klavzula, ki jo je priglasila Avstrija.
The Scientific Committee on Plants concluded on 20 July 2001 that the information submitted by Austria did not constitute new relevant scientific evidence which had not been taken into account during the original evaluation of the dossier and which would occasion a review of that Committee’s original opinion on this product.
Znanstveni odbor za rastline je 20. julija 2001 sklenil, da informacije, ki jih je predložila Avstrija, niso vsebovale novih pomembnih znanstvenih izsledkov, ki ne bi bili upoštevani že pri prvotnem vrednotenju dokumentacije in ki bi sprožili presojo prvotnega mnenja odbora o tem proizvodu.
On 9 January 2004, as well as on 9 and 17 February 2004, Austria submitted to the Commission additional information in support of its national measures concerning maize line T25.
Dne 9. januarja 2004 ter 9. in 17. februarja 2004 je Avstrija Komisiji predložila dodatne informacije v podporo nacionalnim ukrepom glede koruze linije T25.
In accordance with Article 28(1) of Directive 2001/18/EC, the Commission consulted the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), as established by Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], under which it has replaced the relevant scientific committees.
V skladu s členom 28(1) Direktive 2001/18/ES se je Komisija posvetovala z Evropsko agencijo za varnost hrane (EFSA), ustanovljeno z Uredbo (ES) št. 178/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6], s katero je zamenjala ustrezne znanstvene odbore.
The EFSA concluded on 8 July 2004 [7] that the information submitted by Austria did not constitute new scientific evidence sufficient to invalidate the environmental risk assessment of maize line T25, justifying a prohibition of the use and sale of that product in Austria.
EFSA je 8. julija 2004 [7] sklenila, da informacije, ki jih je predložila Avstrija, niso vsebovale novih pomembnih znanstvenih izsledkov, ki bi ovrgli oceno tveganja za okolje za koruzo linije T25, in bi tako upravičili prepoved uporabe in prodaje navedenega proizvoda v Avstriji.
Since, under the circumstances, there was no reason to consider that the product constituted a risk to human health or the environment, the Commission submitted on 29 November 2004 a draft Decision, requesting Austria to repeal its provisional safeguard measure, for consideration by the Committee established under Article 30 of Directive 2001/18/EC, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 30(2) of that Directive.
Ker tako ni bilo razloga za mnenje, da proizvod predstavlja tveganje za človekovo zdravje ali za okolje, je Komisija 29. novembra 2004 predložila osnutek odločbe, v kateri se je od Avstrije zahtevalo, da razveljavi začasno zaščitno klavzulo, odboru, ustanovljenemu v skladu s členom 30 Direktive 2001/18/ES, da o njem poda mnenje v skladu s postopkom iz člena 30(2) navedene direktive.
However, that Committee did not deliver an opinion and, in accordance with Article 5(4) of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission [8], the Commission submitted to the Council a proposal relating to the measures to be taken.
Vendar odbor ni izdal mnenja in Komisija je v skladu s členom 5(4) Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil [8], predložila Svetu predlog ukrepov, ki naj se sprejmejo.
On 24 June 2005, in accordance with Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC, the Council, acting by qualified majority, rejected this proposal.
Svet je 24. junija 2005 v skladu s členom 5(6) Sklepa 1999/468/ES ta predlog s kvalificirano večino zavrnil.
The Council, in its declaration, stated that ‘there is still a degree of uncertainty in relation to the national safeguard measures on the market of [the] genetically modified maize variet[y] […] T25’ and called on the Commission ‘to gather further evidence on the GMO in question and further assess, whether the measure taken by [Austria] aimed at suspending as a temporary precautionary measure [its] placing on the market [is] justified and, whether the authorisation of such [an] organism still meets the safety requirements of Directive 2001/18/EC’.
Svet je v izjavi navedel, da „še vedno obstaja nekaj negotovosti glede nacionalnih zaščitnih ukrepov na trgu z gensko spremenjeno koruzo sorte […] T25“ in Komisijo pozval, „naj pridobi dodatne izsledke o zadevnem GSO in dodatno oceni upravičenost ukrepa, ki ga je sprejela [Avstrija] z namenom ukinitve začasnega preventivnega ukrepa dajanja proizvoda v promet, in ali odobritev takšnega organizma še vedno izpolnjuje varnostne zahteve Direktive 2001/18/ES“.
In November 2005, the EFSA was consulted again by the Commission as to whether there was any scientific reason to believe that the continued placing on the market of T25 maize was likely to cause any adverse effects to human health or the environment under the conditions of consent.
Novembra 2005 se je Komisija znova posvetovala z EFSA, ali obstaja morebitni znanstveni razlog za domnevo, da lahko nadaljnje dajanje v promet koruze T25 v promet povzroči kakršne koli škodljive učinke na zdravje ljudi ali okolje, če se upoštevajo pogoji odobritve.
In particular, the EFSA was requested to take account of any further scientific information that had arisen subsequent to the previous scientific opinion concerning the safety of this GMO.
Od EFSA se je zlasti zahtevalo, da glede varnosti tega GSO upošteva morebitne nove znanstvene podatke, pridobljene po predhodnem znanstvenem mnenju.
In its opinion of 29 March 2006 [9], EFSA concluded that there is no reason to believe that the continued placing on the market of T25 maize is likely to cause any adverse effects for human and animal health or the environment under the conditions of its consent.
V mnenju z dne 29. marca 2006 [9] je EFSA sklenila, da ni razloga za domnevo, da lahko nadaljnje dajanje v promet koruze T25 povzroči kakršne koli škodljive učinke na zdravje ljudi in živali ter na okolje, če se upoštevajo pogoji njegove odobritve.
In accordance with Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC, the Commission submitted a proposal to the Council requesting Austria to repeal its safeguard measure.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 5(6) Sklepa 1999/468/ES Svetu predložila predlog, v katerem se zahteva, da Avstrija razveljavi svojo zaščitno klavzulo.
In accordance with Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC, the Environment Council, on 18 December 2006, indicated its opposition by qualified majority, to the proposal.
V skladu s členom 5(6) Sklepa 1999/468/ES je Svet za okolje 18. decembra 2006 s kvalificirano večino predlogu nasprotoval.
In its Decision, the Council referred to the environmental risk assessment as provided in the Directive 2001/18/EC and indicated that ‘the different agricultural structures and regional ecological characteristics in the European Union need to be taken into account in a more systematic manner in the environmental risk assessment’.
Svet se v odločbi sklicuje na oceno tveganja za okolje, kakor je navedena v Direktivi 2001/18/ES, in navaja, da „je treba v oceni tveganja za okolje bolj sistematično upoštevati različne kmetijske strukture in regionalne ekološke značilnosti v Evropski uniji“.
In accordance with Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC the Commission submitted an amended proposal in order to take into account the Council Decision of 18 December 2006 which refers only to the environmental aspects of the Austrian safeguard clause, namely cultivation aspects.
Da bi upoštevala Odločbo Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006, ki se nanaša samo na okoljske vidike avstrijske zaščitne klavzule, tj. na pridelavo, je Komisija v skladu s členom 5(6) Sklepa 1999/468/ES predložila spremenjeni predlog.
Austria has initiated work to collect any relevant scientific evidence on these aspects, which in the view of Austria justifies provisionally the maintenance of the safeguard clause, in particular in reference to ‘the different agricultural structures and regional ecological characteristics’ as indicated in recital 3 of the above mentioned Council decision.
Avstrija je začela zbirati pomembne znanstvene izsledke o teh vidikih, kar po mnenju Avstrije upravičujejo začasno ohranitev zaščitne klavzule, zlasti glede na „različne kmetijske strukture in regionalne ekološke značilnosti“, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 3 zgoraj navedene odločbe Sveta.
In accordance with Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC, Austria is invited to provide the Commission with all the scientific evidence that it has collected as well as any new risk assessment as soon as it is completed and inform all Member States thereof.
Avstrija se v skladu s členom 23 Direktive 2001/18/ES poziva, naj Komisiji predloži vse zbrane znanstvene izsledke ter morebitno novo oceno tveganja, takoj ko bo dokončana, in o tem obvesti vse države članice.
On the basis of Austria’s submission and its scientific assessment, the Commission will act in accordance with Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC on these aspects of the Austrian measure.
Komisija bo na podlagi izsledkov, ki jih bo predložila Avstrija, in njihove znanstvene ocene ukrepala v skladu s členom 23 Direktive 2001/18/ES glede teh vidikov ukrepa Avstrije.
The food and feed safety aspects of Zea mays L. line T25 covered by the consent granted under Directive 90/220/EEC (including import and processing) are identical throughout Europe and have been assessed by the EFSA, which concluded that this product is unlikely to cause any adverse effects for human and animal health.
Varnostni vidiki v zvezi z živili in krmo za koruzo Zea mays L. linija T25, ki jih zajema odobritev v skladu z Direktivo 90/220/EGS (vključno z uvozom in predelavo), so povsod po Evropi enaki in jih je ocenila EFSA, ki je zaključila, da ta proizvod verjetno ne bo imel škodljivih učinkov na zdravje ljudi in živali.
The Commission proposal takes into account only food and feed aspects of the Austrian prohibition namely the prohibition on import and processing of unprocessed kernels as source materials for further processing or for direct food or feed use.
Predlog Komisija zajema samo tiste vidike prepovedi Avstrije, ki se nanašajo na živila in krmo, tj. prepoved uvoza in predelave nepredelanih zrn kot surovin za nadaljnjo predelavo ali za neposredno uporabo za živila ali krmo.
Under these circumstances Austria should repeal its safeguard measures at least with regard to import and processing into food and feed of Zea mays L. line T25.
Avstrija bi zato morala razveljaviti svoje zaščitne ukrepe vsaj za uvoz koruze Zea mays L. linija T25 ter njeno predelavo v živila in krmo.
Since on the expiry of the period laid down in Article 30(2) of Directive 2001/18/EC, the Council had neither adopted the proposed measures nor indicated its opposition to them, in accordance with Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC, the measures should be adopted by the Commission,
Ker po izteku obdobja iz člena 30(2) Direktive 2001/18/ES Svet ni niti sprejel predlaganih ukrepov niti jim ni nasprotoval v skladu s členom 5(6) Sklepa 1999/468/ES, mora ukrepe sprejeti Komisija –
The measures taken by Austria to prohibit the import and the processing into food and feed products of the Zea mays L. line T25, authorised for placing on the market by Decision 98/293/EC are not justified under Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC.
Ukrepi Avstrije za prepoved uvoza koruze Zea mays L. linija T25, katere dajanje v promet je bilo odobreno z Odločbo 98/293/ES, ter njene predelave v živila in krmo v skladu s členom 23 Direktive 2001/18/ES niso upravičeni.
Austria shall take the necessary steps to terminate the prohibition of import and processing into food and feed products of Zea mays L. line T25 at the latest 20 days after its notification.
Avstrija sprejme potrebne ukrepe za ukinitev prepovedi uvoza koruze Zea mays L. linija T25 ter njene predelave v živila in krmo najpozneje 20 dni po njeni uradni priglasitvi.
Done at Brussels, 7 May 2008.
V Bruslju, 7. maja 2008
Directive as last amended by Directive 2008/27/EC (OJ L 81, 20.3.2008, p. 45).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2008/27/ES (UL L 81, 20.3.2008, str. 45).
OJ L 131, 5.5.1998, p. 30.
UL L 131, 5.5.1998, str. 30.
Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 97/35/EC (OJ L 169, 27.6.1997, p. 72).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Komisije 97/35/ES (UL L 169, 27.6.1997, str. 72).
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 298/2008 (OJ L 97, 9.4.2008, p. 64).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 298/2008 (UL L 97, 9.4.2008, str. 64).
Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the Commission related to the Austrian invoke of Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC, The EFSA Journal (2004) 78, 1-13.
Mnenje Znanstvenega odbora o gensko spremenjenih organizmih na zahtevo Komisije v zvezi z avstrijsko uveljavitvijo člena 23 Direktive 2001/18/ES, The EFSA Journal (2004) 78, 1–13.