natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Specifications, as provided in the ICD and DTS, shall be stable for a given period and the timing of the update of both systems shall be laid down in a release plan that shall define the reference version for a given test phase.
Specifikacije, kakor so določene v kontrolnem dokumentu vmesnika in podrobnih tehničnih specifikacijah, ostanejo nespremenjene za dano obdobje, posodobitve obeh sistemov pa je treba določiti v načrtu izdaj posodobitev, ki določa referenčno različico za vsako fazo preskusa.
Issues found during the test campaigns shall be reported, analysed and solved in accordance with a release management plan and associated change management plan.
Težave, ugotovljene med testiranjem, je treba sporočiti, analizirati in rešiti v skladu z načrtom izdaj posodobitev in s tem povezanim načrtom za upravljanje sprememb.
The release management plan and associated change management plan shall be made available by the Commission, taking into account the opinion of Member States’ experts.
Načrt izdaj posodobitev in s tem povezani načrt za upravljanje sprememb pripravi Komisija ob upoštevanju mnenja strokovnjakov držav članic.
INTERIM AND FINAL REPORT ON THE RESULTS OF THE TEST PHASES
VMESNO IN KONČNO POROČILO O REZULTATIH TESTNIH FAZ
The Commission shall draw up, on a regular basis, reports on the status of the tests.
Komisija redno pripravlja poročila o statusu preskusov.
The reports shall note which test phase is currently being dealt with and which Member States have completed, begun or not yet begun that phase.
V poročilu je zapisano, katera testna faza trenutno poteka in katere države članice so zaključile, začele ali še niso začele to fazo.
If any repercussions for the project timetable are noticeable, they and their cause should be recorded.
Če se opazijo posledice za časovni načrt projekta, se skupaj z vzrokom zabeležijo.
On conclusion of each test phase the Commission shall draw up a report on the results, any issue it detects and options for solutions.
Ob zaključku vsake testne faze Komisija pripravi poročilo o rezultatih, ugotovljenih problemih in možnih rešitvah.
In cases where a Member State considers that tests could not be successfully completed it shall record this fact, stating the reasons, in a note for the minutes.
V primerih, kjer država članica meni, da preskusov ni bilo mogoče uspešno zaključiti, to zabeleži in navede razloge v opombi k zapisniku.
As regards other Member States not participating in SIS 1 + like Cyprus, their participation in the SIS II tests referred to in this Decision is without prejudice to any future Council Decision on the full application of the SIS II.
Glede drugih držav članic, ki ne sodelujejo v SIS 1+, kot Ciper, je njihova udeležba v preskusih SIS II iz tega sklepa brez poseganja v morebitne prihodnje odločitve Sveta o popolni uporabi SIS II.
The Test Advisory Group created on 27 April 2007 according to Article 7 of the Rules of Procedure of the SIS II Committee, reports to the SIS II Committee.
Svetovalna skupina za testiranje, ki je bila ustanovljena 27. aprila 2007 v skladu s členom 7 poslovnika odbora SIS II poroča odboru SIS II.
It reports after the completion of each test part to help preparing the acceptance of SIS II tests.
Poroča po zaključku vsakega dela preskusa, da pripomore k pripravi priznavanja preskusov SIS II.
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2008/173/EC of 18 February 2008 on the tests of the second Schengen Information System (SIS II)
Popravek Sklepa Sveta 2008/173/ES z dne 18. februarja 2008 o testih schengenskega informacijskega sistema druge generacije (SIS II)
(Official Journal of the European Union L 57 of 1 March 2008)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 57 z dne 1. marca 2008)
In the contents on the cover and in the title on page 14:
V kazalu vsebine na naslovni strani ter v naslovu na strani 14:
‘2008/173/JHA’.
„2008/173/PNZ“.
This Decision should be considered a published under Section L III, Title VI.
Ta sklep naj se šteje, kot da je objavljen v oddelku L III, naslov VI.
concerning State aid proposed by Italy (Autonomous Province of Trento) in the transport sector
o državni pomoči Italije (Avtonomna pokrajina Trento) transportnemu sektorju
(notified under document number C(2005) 5315)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2005) 5315)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to those provisions [1],
po pozivu zainteresiranim strankam, da predložijo pripombe v skladu z navedenimi določbami [1],
By letter of 27 November 2001, recorded as received at the Secretariat-General on 3 December 2001, the Italian authorities notified the Commission, in accordance with Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty, of the special provisions for the transport sector adopted under Law No 6 of the Autonomous Province of Trento of 13 December 1999 (hereinafter Provincial Law No 6/99).
Italijanski organi so z dopisom z dne 27. novembra 2001, ki je bil evidentiran pri Generalnem sekretariatu 3. decembra 2001, v skladu s členom 88(3) Pogodbe ES obvestili Komisijo o posebnih določbah za transportni sektor, sprejetih z zakonom pokrajine Trento št. 6 z dne 13. decembra 1999 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Pokrajinski zakon št. 6/99).
The notification was registered by the Secretariat-General of the European Commission as N 833/01.
Generalni sekretariat Evropske komisije je obvestilo evidentiral pod št. N 833/01.
As the notification was incomplete, the Commission requested additional information in its letter D(02) 1665 of 1 February 2002, to which a reply was received by letter registered on 5 April 2002.
Ker je bilo obvestilo nepopolno, je Komisija z dopisom D(02) 1665 z dne 1. februarja 2002 zahtevala dodatne informacije in prejela odgovor v dopisu, evidentiranem 5. aprila 2002.
A meeting was held between representatives of the Commission and of the Autonomous Province of Trento on 11 March 2002.
Predstavniki Komisije in Avtonomne pokrajine Trento so se sestali 11. marca 2002.
The Commission sent the Italian authorities a letter requesting further information on 12 April 2002.
Komisija je italijanskim organom 12. aprila 2002 poslala dopis z zahtevo po dodatnih informacijah.
A reply to this request was sent by letter dated 17 May 2002, recorded as received on 28 May 2002 as SG A/5459.
Na navedeno zahtevo so odgovorili z dopisom z dne 17. maja 2002, ki je bil evidentiran 28. maja 2002 (SG A/5459).
A second meeting was held between representatives of the Commission and of the Autonomous Province of Trento on 30 May 2002.
Predstavniki Komisije in Avtonomne pokrajine Trento so se drugič sestali 30. maja 2002.
On 24 July 2002, the Commission adopted a favourable decision [2] regarding most of the measures provided for in Provincial Law No 6/99 ‘Special provisions for the transport sector’ [3] and intended to encourage the transfer of road freight to alternative modes of transport.
Komisija je 24. julija 2002 sprejela ugodno odločitev [2] za večino ukrepov iz Pokrajinskega zakona št. 6/99 „Posebne določbe za transportni sektor“ [3], ki je namenjen spodbujanju prenosa prometa blaga s cestnega prevoza na druge načine.
However, investigation proceedings were initiated in connection with one of the measures contained in the scheme, namely investment aid for railway wagons and new or reconditioned rolling stock, registered as C 52/02.
Vendar je bil vseeno uveden postopek preiskave v zvezi z enim od ukrepov iz sheme, tj. glede pomoči za naložbe v železniške vagone in nova ali obnovljena vozna sredstva, evidentirane pod št. C 52/02.
The decision of 24 July 2002 to initiate proceedings was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [4].
Odločitev Komisije o začetku postopka z dne 24. julija 2002 je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [4].
The Commission called on interested parties to submit their comments.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane stranke k predložitvi pripomb.
Italy submitted its comments by letter dated 4 September 2002.
Italija je v dopisu z dne 4. septembra 2002 predložila svoje pripombe.
A new aid scheme aimed at promoting combined transport in the Autonomous Province of Trento was notified by the Italian authorities on 7 February 2003 under the title ‘Granting of aid in support of combined transport’.
Italijanski organi so 7. februarja 2003 priglasili novo shemo pomoči, namenjeno spodbujanju kombiniranega prevoza v Avtonomni pokrajini Trento z naslovom „Shema pomoči v podporo kombiniranemu prevozu“.
This aid scheme was registered as N 64/03 and was approved by a Commission Decision of 1 October 2003 [5].
Navedena shema pomoči je bila evidentirana pod št. N 64/03 in odobrena z odločitvijo Komisije z dne 1. oktobra 2003 [5].
Further clarifications were sent by the Autonomous Province of Trento on 8 April 2005 and then by letter recorded as received on 13 June 2005 by the Permanent Representation.
Avtonomna pokrajina Trento je 8. aprila 2005 poslala dodatna pojasnila, Stalno predstavništvo Italijanske republike pri Evropski uniji pa je dodatna pojasnila poslalo z dopisom, evidentiranim 13. junija 2005.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE AID
PODROBEN OPIS UKREPA POMOČI
The aid measure in respect of which the investigation proceedings were initiated concerned investment aid for railway wagons and new or reconditioned rolling stock; no objections were raised, however, regarding the remaining measures provided for in the general scheme aimed at encouraging the transfer of road freight to alternative modes of transport.
Postopek preiskave je bil uveden za ukrep pomoči za naložbe v železniške vagone in nova ali obnovljena vozna sredstva; medtem ko ni bilo ugovorov zoper druge ukrepe v splošni shemi, namenjene spodbujanju prenosa prometa blaga s cestnega prevoza na druge načine.
The aim of the general scheme is to reduce the environmental impact of road haulage by encouraging the purchase of means of transport equipped with technology that reduces environmental pollution and exceeds compulsory environmental standards.
Splošna shema je namenjena zmanjšanju vpliva cestnega prevoza blaga na okolje s podpiranjem nakupa prevoznih sredstev s tehnološko opremo, ki zmanjšuje onesnaževanje okolja in presega obvezne ekološke standarde.
The scheme concerns aid for small and medium-sized enterprises and consortia engaged in road haulage on behalf of third parties which carry out combined transport activities or perform rail and overland transport activities in any way connected with combined rail transport or the transport of goods or passengers.
Shema podeljuje pomoč malim in srednjim podjetjem ter konzorcijem, ki se ukvarjajo s cestnim prevozom blaga v imenu tretjih, ki opravljajo dejavnosti kombiniranega prevoza ali dejavnosti železniškega prevoza in dejavnosti v zvezi s kopenskim prevozom, ki so kakor koli povezane s kombiniranim železniškim prevozom ali prevozom blaga ali potnikov.
The investigated measure provided for aid of up to 25 % for small and medium-sized enterprises operating in the Autonomous Province of Trento for the acquisition of railway wagons and new or reconditioned rolling stock (Article 3(2)(e) of Provincial Law No 6/99).
Ukrep, ki se preiskuje, predvideva največ 25-odstotno pomoč malim in srednjim podjetjem, ki poslujejo v Avtonomni pokrajini Trento, pri nakupu železniških vagonov in novih ali obnovljenih voznih sredstev (člen 3(2)(e) Pokrajinskega zakona št. 6/99).
Grounds for initiating proceedings
Razlogi za začetek postopka
The Commission’s decision to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 88(2) of the Treaty and to request clarification from the Italian authorities arose from an initial examination of the notified scheme.
Na podlagi začetnega pregleda priglašenega projekta se je Komisija odločila, da začne postopek iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe in zahteva pojasnila od italijanskih organov.
In particular, the Commission had doubts concerning the measure’s compatibility with Article 4(2) and (5) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to small and medium-sized enterprises [6] which would limit the gross aid intensity of investment in railway wagons to 15 % in the case of small enterprises and to 7,5 % in the case of medium-sized enterprises.
Komisija je izrazila svoje pomisleke zlasti glede združljivosti ukrepa s členom 4(2) in (5) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 70/2001 z dne 12. januarja 2001 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES pri pomoči za majhna in srednje velika podjetja [6], ki dovoljuje pomoč MSP za naložbe v železniške vagone do 15 % za mala podjetja in 7,5 % za srednja podjetja.
The Commission doubted whether the notified aid intensity (25 %) could be compatible with the maximum aid intensity allowed under Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001.
Komisija je dvomila, da bi bila priglašena intenzivnost pomoči v višini 25 % lahko združljiva z največjo intenzivnostjo pomoči, ki jo določa člen 4(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 70/2001.
Non-compliance with the thresholds indicated in Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 was the only reason for initiating investigation proceedings.
Postopek preiskave je bil uveden samo zaradi neskladnosti s pragi iz Uredbe št. 70/2001.
By letter of 4 September 2004, the Italian authorities, via their Permanent Representation, stated their intention to grant aid not exceeding 15 % to small enterprises and not exceeding 7,5 % to medium-sized enterprises in respect of the costs of acquisition of railway wagons and new or reconditioned rolling stock.
Italijanski organi so po svojem Stalnem predstavništvu z dopisom z dne 4. septembra 2004 sporočili, da imajo namen dodeliti malim podjetjem do 15 % pomoči, srednjim podjetjem pa do 7,5 % pomoči za stroške nakupa železniških vagonov in novih ali obnovljenih voznih sredstev.
Their intention was that this aid should be combined with the financing of 25 % of the costs connected with the leasing, amortisation or hire of special ultra-low railway wagons for accompanied combined transport services for a maximum of three years.
Italijanski organi so imeli namen kumulirati pomoč, ki se preiskuje, s financiranjem 25 % stroškov za zakup, amortizacijo ali najem posebnih železniških vagonov z nizkim podom za kombinirani spremljani prevoz za največ tri leta.
The undertakings benefiting from the subsidies would still be responsible for the part of the expenditure not covered by public aid.
Podjetja, ki so deležna subvencij, naj bi še vedno krila tisti del izdatkov, ki ga ne zajema državna pomoč.
The Province of Trento would ask recipients to ensure that the tariffs that they charge are public and non-discriminatory, i.e. the same for all users and all sections of the route.
Pokrajina Trento naj bi od upravičencev zahtevala, da so njihove tarife javne in nediskriminacijske, tj. enake za vse uporabnike na vseh odsekih.
The competent authorities claimed that, given the lack of intermodal structures, the Province of Trento intended to finance all business initiatives to provide ultra-low railway wagons on a first-come first-served basis and until the relevant budget was exhausted.
Pristojni organi so sporočili, da je Pokrajina Trento nameravala zaradi pomanjkanja intermodalnih struktur financirati vse podjetniške pobude, namenjene preskrbi z železniškimi vagoni z nizkim podom, in sicer po sistemu „prvi prispe, prvi dobi“ do porabe proračunskih sredstev.
However, it reserved the right, should the budget prove insufficient, to publish public invitations to apply for aid, giving priority to those activities involving the highest daily frequency of road/rail transshipments onto wagons departing from transshipment points located in the Province.
Če proračunska sredstva ne bi zadostovala, pa si je pridržala pravico do objave javnega razpisa za pridobitev pomoči, pri čemer bi dala prednost dejavnostim z največjo dnevno pogostnostjo pretovora med železnico in cesto na vagonih, ki odpotujejo s pretovarišč v pokrajini.
It should be noted, however, that the latter measure was not included in the initial notification.
Omeniti je treba, da slednjega ukrepa ni bilo v začetni priglasitvi.
Moreover, the Autonomous Province of Trento confirmed on 8 April 2005 that the measure had never been put in place and that there was no longer any intention to implement it.
Poleg tega je Avtonomna pokrajina Trento 8. aprila 2005 potrdila, da navedenega ukrepa ni nikoli uvedla in da ga ne namerava več uvesti.
Existence of aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty
Obstoj pomoči iz člena 87(1) Pogodbe
Pursuant to Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty, and unless otherwise provided for in that Treaty, any aid granted by a Member State which distorts or threatens to distort competition is incompatible with the common market if it affects trade between Member States.
Po členu 87(1) Pogodbe ES je vsaka pomoč, ki jo dodeli država članica in ki izkrivlja ali bi lahko izkrivljala konkurenco, nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom, kolikor prizadene trgovino med državami članicami, razen če Pogodba ne določa drugače.
Under the proposed aid measure, the preselected beneficiaries (small and medium-sized enterprises operating in the Autonomous Province of Trento) would receive State contributions for costs arising from investment in railway wagons and rolling stock, while other enterprises, whether Italian or from other EU Member States, that are active in this field would not receive such contributions.
Na podlagi predlaganega ukrepa bi izbrani upravičenci (mala in srednja podjetja, ki poslujejo v Avtonomni pokrajini Trento) prejeli državne prispevke za stroške pri naložbah v železniške vagone in vozna sredstva, medtem ko druga podjetja, nacionalna ali iz drugih držav članic, ki so dejavna na tem področju, takih prispevkov ne bi prejela.
The aid thus reinforces the competitive situation of the recipients vis-à-vis other operators engaged in intra-Community trade.
Ukrepi zato krepijo konkurenčni položaj upravičencev nasproti drugim podjetjem, ki delujejo v trgovini znotraj Skupnosti.
In view of the above, the Commission finds that the notified aid measure involves aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) and is hence, in principle, prohibited.
Zaradi tega Komisija meni, da priglašeni ukrep pomoči vključuje elemente pomoči iz člena 87(1) in je zato načelno prepovedan.
Assessment of the compatibility of the aid measure
Ovrednotenje združljivosti ukrepa pomoči
After investigation proceedings were initiated, the Italian authorities agreed to reduce the planned aid intensity of 25 % for the acquisition of railway wagons and new or reconditioned rolling stock to 15 % for small enterprises and 7,5 % for medium-sized enterprises.
Po uvedbi postopka preiskave so bili italijanski organi pripravljeni zmanjšati načrtovano intenzivnost pomoči pri nakupu železniških vagonov in novih ali obnovljenih voznih sredstev s 25 % na 15 % za mala podjetja in 7,5 % za srednja podjetja.
The aid measure concerns only aid to small and medium-sized enterprises.
Ukrep pomoči zajema samo pomoč malim in srednjim podjetjem.
The aid can be therefore be considered to be in line with Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001.
Pomoč se zato lahko šteje za skladno s členom 4(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 70/2001.
In view of the above, the Commission can therefore now declare this aid to be compatible with the Treaty.
Zaradi zgoraj navedenega je Komisija presodila, da je ta ukrep združljiv s Pogodbo.
The Commission
Komisija je –
The State aid proposed by Italy (Autonomous Province of Trento) in the transport sector is compatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč Italije (Avtonomna pokrajina Trento) na področju prometa je združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The aid may therefore be implemented.
Navedena pomoč se zato lahko izvaja.
OJ C 242, 8.10.2002, p. 8.
UL C 242, 8.10.2002, str. 8.
State aid N 833/01 — Italy (Autonomous Province of Trento) — Provincial Law No 6/99 ‘Special provisions for the transport sector’.
Državna pomoč N 833/01 – Italija (Avtonomna pokrajina Trento) – Pokrajinski zakon št. 6/99 „Posebne določbe za transportni sektor“.
OJ C 284, 27.11.2003, p. 2.
UL C 284, 27.11.2003, str. 2.
amending Decision 97/107/EC authorising methods for grading pig carcases in Belgium
o spremembi Odločbe 97/107/ES o odobritvi metode za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov v Belgiji
(notified under document number C(2008) 678)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 678)
Commission Decision 97/107/EC [2] authorises two methods (Capteur Gras/Maigre — Sydel (CGM) and Giralda Choirometer PG 200) for grading pig carcases in Belgium.
Z Odločbo Komisije 97/107/ES [2] sta odobreni dve metodi (Capteur Gras/Maigre – Sydel (CGM) in Giralda Choirometer PG 200) za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov v Belgiji.
Belgium has asked the Commission to authorise three new methods of grading pig carcases and has presented the results of its dissection trials in the second part of the protocol provided for in Article 3(3) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85 of 24 October 1985 laying down detailed rules for the application of the Community scale for grading pig carcases [3].
Belgija je Komisijo prosila za odobritev treh novih metod za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov in predložila rezultate svojih preskusov razseka v drugem delu protokola v skladu s členom 3(3) Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2967/85 z dne 24. oktobra 1985 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo lestvice Skupnosti za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov [3].
Decision 97/107/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 97/107/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Decision 97/107/EC is amended as follows:
Odločba 97/107/ES se spremeni:
the following indents are added to the first paragraph of Article 1:
Prvemu odstavku člena 1 se dodajo naslednje alinee:
the apparatus called “VCS 2000” and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 3 of the Annex,
naprava, imenovana ‚VCS 2000‘, in z njo povezane metode ocenjevanja, ki so podrobno opredeljene v delu 3 Priloge;
the apparatus called “Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP4)” and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 4 of the Annex,
naprava, imenovana ‚Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP4)‘, in z njo povezane metode ocenjevanja, ki so podrobno opredeljene v delu 4 Priloge;
the apparatus called “Optiscan-TP” and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 5 of the Annex;’
naprava, imenovana ‚Optiscan-TP‘, in z njo povezane metode ocenjevanja, ki so podrobno opredeljene v delu 5 Priloge.“
OJ L 39, 8.2.1997, p. 17.
UL L 39, 8.2.1997, str. 17.
Decision as amended by Decision 97/734/EC (OJ L 294, 28.10.1997, p. 6).
Odločba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo 97/734/ES (UL L 294, 28.10.1997, str. 6).
In the Annex to Decision 97/107/EC the following Parts 3, 4 and 5 are added:
V Prilogi k Odločbi 97/107/ES se dodajo naslednji deli 3, 4 in 5:
Grading of pig carcasses is carried out by means of the apparatus known as “VCS 2000”.
Razvrščanje prašičjih trupov se opravi z napravo, imenovano ‚VCS 2000‘.
The apparatus VCS 2000 is a picture-processing system for automatically determining the trade values of pork-carcass-halves.
Naprava VCS 2000 je sistem obdelave slike za samodejno določanje tržne vrednosti prašičjih polovic.
The picture data is then processed in a computer by special picture processing software.
Slikovne podatke nato obdela računalnik s posebno programsko opremo za obdelavo slike.
The lean meat content of the carcasses shall be calculated on the basis of 38 variables according to the following formula:
Delež mesnatosti trupov se izračuna z naslednjo enačbo na podlagi 38 spremenljivk: