natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
be obtained, cut, transported and stored separately from meat intended for intra-Community trade or export to third countries;
se pridobi, razreže, prevaža in hrani ločeno od mesa, namenjenega trgovini znotraj Skupnosti ali izvozu v tretje države;
be used in such a way as to ensure that it is not introduced into meat products intended for intra-Community trade or export to third countries, unless it has undergone the treatment set out in Annex III to Directive 2002/99/EC.
se uporablja tako, da ni vključeno v mesne izdelke, namenjene trgovini znotraj Skupnosti ali izvozu v tretje države, razen če je bilo obdelano v skladu s Prilogo III k Direktivi 2002/99/ES.
Decision as amended by Decision 2003/859/EC (OJ L 324, 11.12.2003, p. 55).
Odločba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo 2003/859/ES (UL L 324, 11.12.2003, str. 55).
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1791/2006.
The mark referred to in Article 2(1) shall be easily legible and have clearly displayed characters and the following shape and indications:
Oznaka iz člena 2(1) je enostavno čitljiva in ima jasno razporejene črke ter naslednjo obliko in navedbe:
Whereby:
pri čemer:
‘XY’ means the relevant country code provided for in point 6 of Part B of Section I of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004, and
„XY“ pomeni ustrezno oznako države iz točke 6 dela B oddelka I Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 853/2004, in
‘1234’ means the approval number of the establishment referred to in point 7 of Part B of Section I of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004.
„1234“ pomeni številko odobritve obrata iz točke 7 dela B oddelka I Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 853/2004.
laying down specific measures to be applied by Cyprus with regard to scrapie
o posebnih ukrepih, ki jih mora uporabljati Ciper glede praskavca
(notified under document number C(2007) 1877)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 1877)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 836/2004 of 28 April 2004 laying down the transitional measures to be applied by Cyprus with regard to scrapie [2] was adopted in view of the exceptional high level of scrapie in the ovine and caprine populations in Cyprus.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 836/2004 z dne 28. aprila 2004 o prehodnih ukrepih, ki jih mora uporabljati Ciper glede praskavca [2], je bila sprejeta zaradi izredno visoke ravni praskavca v populaciji ovac in koz na Cipru.
It lays down certain transitional measures, including a prohibition on the dispatch from Cyprus to other Member States and third countries of certain meat and meat products derived from ovine and caprine animals.
Določa nekatere prehodne ukrepe, vključno s prepovedjo odpošiljanja nekaterega mesa in mesnih proizvodov ovac in koz s Cipra v druge države članice in v tretje države.
That Regulation applies until 30 April 2007.
Navedena uredba se uporablja do 30. aprila 2007.
The results of the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE) eradication and monitoring programme for 2006 in the Community indicate that in Cyprus, 865 cases of TSE in sheep were diagnosed, out of the total of 2579 TSE cases in the Community, and 461 TSE cases in goats were diagnosed, out of the total of 531 TSE cases in the Community.
Rezultati izkoreninjenja transmisivnih spongiformnih encefalopatij (TSE) in programa nadzora za leto 2006 v Skupnosti kažejo, da je bilo od skupno 2579 primerov TSE pri ovcah v Skupnosti na Cipru odkritih 865 primerov, pri kozah pa 461 od skupno 531 primerov TSE v Skupnosti.
In the framework of the TSE roadmap (COM(2005) 322 final) adopted on 15 July 2005 and in line with the SANCO work programme 2006-2007 on TSEs (SEC(2006) 1527), the Commission is currently discussing with the Member States on a proposal to review the current measures to apply in TSE affected flocks where BSE has been excluded.
V okviru časovnega načrta TSE iz Sporočila (COM(2005) 322 konč.), sprejetega 15. julija 2005, in v skladu z delovnim programom GD za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov 2006–2007 o TSE (SEC(2006) 1527) Komisija trenutno z državami članicami razpravlja o predlogu glede pregleda sedanjih ukrepov, ki se morajo uporabljati za prizadete črede, pri katerih je bila prisotnost BSE izključena.
Due to the animal health situation in Cyprus in sheep and goat populations with regard to scrapie, taking control requirements into account and awaiting the conclusions of the discussion on a review of the current eradication measures it is necessary to maintain certain protection measures as regards the intra-Community trade and trade with third countries with certain meat and meat products derived from ovine and caprine animals in order to prevent the risk of the disease in other Member States.
Zaradi zdravstvenega stanja populacije ovac in koz na Cipru v zvezi s praskavcem je treba ob upoštevanju zahtev kontrole in med čakanjem na sklepe razprav o pregledu sedanjih ukrepov izkoreninjenja ohraniti nekatere zaščitne ukrepe pri trgovini z nekaterimi vrstami mesa ter mesnih proizvodov ovac in koz znotraj Skupnosti in pri trgovini s tretjimi državami, da se prepreči tveganje bolezni v drugih državah članicah.
The dispatch of products derived from ovine and caprine animals in Cyprus to other Member States and the export thereof to third countries should therefore continue to be prohibited.
Odpošiljanje proizvodov iz mesa ovac in koz s Cipra v druge države članice in njihov izvoz v tretje države članice sta še naprej prepovedana.
Cyprus shall ensure that fresh meat, minced meat, meat preparations and meat products, as defined in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3], derived from ovine and caprine animals are not dispatched from that Member State to other Member States or exported to third countries.Article 2
Ciper zagotovi, da se sveže meso, mleto meso, mesni pripravki in mesni proizvodi iz mesa ovac in koz, kot so opredeljeni v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 853/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3], ne odpošiljajo iz Cipra v druge države članice ali izvažajo v tretje države.Člen 2
This Decision shall apply until 31 October 2007.
Ta odločba se uporablja do 31. oktobra 2007.
Directive as last amended by Directive 2004/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 157, 30.4.2004, p. 33, as corrected by OJ L 195, 2.6.2004, p. 12).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2004/41/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 157, 30.4.2004, str. 33).
establishing the position to be adopted on behalf of the Community within the International Sugar Council as regards the extension of the International Sugar Agreement 1992
o stališču, ki naj bo v imenu Skupnosti sprejeto v Mednarodnem svetu za sladkor glede podaljšanja Mednarodnega sporazuma o sladkorju iz leta 1992
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 in conjunction with the second subparagraph of Article 300(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 133 v povezavi z drugim pododstavkom člena 300(2) Pogodbe,
The International Sugar Agreement 1992 was concluded by the Community by Decision 92/580/EEC [1] and entered into force on 1 January 1993 for a period of three years until 31 December 1995.
Mednarodni sporazum o sladkorju iz leta 1992 je Skupnost sklenila s Sklepom 92/580/EGS [1] in je stopil v veljavo 1. januarja 1993 za obdobje treh let do 31. decembra 1995.
Since then, it has been regularly extended for further periods of two years.
Od takrat se je redno podaljševal za nadaljnja obdobja dveh let.
The Agreement was last extended by decision of the International Sugar Council in May 2005 and remains in force until 31 December 2007.
Sporazum je bil nazadnje podaljšan s sklepom Mednarodnega sveta za sladkor maja 2005 in ostaja v veljavi do 31. decembra 2007.
A further extension is in the interest of the Community.
Nadaljnje podaljšanje je v interesu Skupnosti.
The Commission, which represents the Community in the International Sugar Council, should therefore be authorised to vote in favour of such extension,
Komisija, ki zastopa Skupnost v Mednarodnem svetu za sladkor, bi zato morala biti pooblaščena za glasovanje v prid takega podaljšanja –
The Community’s position within the International Sugar Council shall be to vote in favour of the extension of the International Sugar Agreement 1992 for a further period of up to two years.
Stališče Skupnosti v Mednarodnem svetu za sladkor je glasovati v prid podaljšanja Mednarodnega sporazuma o sladkorju iz leta 1992 za nadaljnje obdobje do dveh let.
The Commission is hereby authorised to express this position within the International Sugar Council.
Ta sklep pooblašča Komisijo, da izrazi to stališče v okviru Mednarodnega sveta za sladkor.
OJ L 379, 23.12.1992, p. 15.
UL L 379, 23.12.1992, str. 15.
establishing the position to be adopted, on behalf of the Community, within the International Grains Council with respect to the extension of the Grains Trade Convention 1995
o stališču, ki naj bo v imenu Skupnosti sprejeto v Mednarodnem svetu za žita v zvezi s podaljšanjem Konvencije o trgovanju z žiti iz leta 1995
The Grains Trade Convention 1995 was concluded by the Community by Decision 96/88/EC [1] and was regularly extended for further periods of two years.
Konvencijo o trgovanju z žiti iz leta 1995 je sklenila Skupnost s Sklepom 96/88/ES [1] in je bila redno podaljšana za nadaljnja obdobja dveh let.
The Convention was extended last time by decision of the International Grains Council in June 2005 and remains in force until 30 June 2007.
Konvencija je bila nazadnje podaljšana s sklepom Mednarodnega sveta za žita junija 2005 in ostaja v veljavi do 30. junija 2007.
The Commission, which represents the Community in the International Grains Council, should therefore be authorised to vote in favour of such extension,
Komisija, ki zastopa Skupnost v Mednarodnem svetu za žita, bi zato morala biti pooblaščena za glasovanje v prid takega podaljšanja –
The Community’s position within the International Grains Council shall be to vote in favour of the extension of the Grains Trade Convention 1995 for a further period of up to two years.
Stališče Skupnosti v Mednarodnem svetu za žita je, da bo glasovala v prid podaljšanja Konvencije o trgovanju z žiti iz leta 1995 za nadaljnje obdobje do dveh let.
The Commission is hereby authorised to express this position within the International Grains Council.
Ta sklep pooblašča Komisijo, da izrazi to stališče v okviru Mednarodnega sveta za žita.
OJ L 21, 27.1.1996, p. 47.
UL L 21, 27.1.1996, str. 47.
on State aid C 45/04 (ex NN 62/04) in favour of the Czech steel producer Třinecké železárny a.s.
o državni pomoči C 45/04 (prej NN 62/04) v korist češkega proizvajalca jekla Třinecké železárny a.s.
(notified under document number C(2006) 5245)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 5245)
Having regard to Protocol 2 on the restructuring of the Czech steel industry to the 2003 Accession Treaty,
ob upoštevanju Protokola št. 2 o prestrukturiranju češke jeklarske industrije k Pogodbi o pristopu iz leta 2003,
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [1],
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi določbami [1],
On 12 November 2003 the Commission received information that the Czech Government had adopted the ‘Resolution concerning the finalisation of the restructuring of the steel sector and proposing a solution for Třinecké železárny, a.s.’ (hereinafter referred to as TŽ).
Komisija je 12. novembra 2003 prejela informacijo, da je češka vlada sprejela „Resolucijo o zaključku prestrukturiranja jeklarskega sektorja in predlogu rešitve za Třinecké železárny a.s.“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu „TŽ“).
The Resolution indicated that the Government planned to grant State aid amounting to around CZK 1,9 billion (approximately EUR 67 million) [2] to TŽ.
V Resoluciji je navedeno, da vlada načrtuje dodelitev državne pomoči TŽ v znesku približno 1,9 milijarde CZK (približno 67 milijonov EUR) [2].
In the Resolution the Czech Government gave its consent to the following transactions:
V Resoluciji je češka vlada odobrila naslednji transakciji:
the Czech Government acquires from TŽ, through the Czech Consolidation Agency (CCA), the 10,54 % stake held by TŽ in the steel company ISPAT Nová Huť (INH).
Češka vlada prek Češke agencije za konsolidacijo od TŽ pridobi 10,54-odstotni delež v lasti TŽ v jeklarski družbi ISPAT Nová Huť („INH“).
The price for these shares will be determined by the Ministry of Finance in agreement with the Ministry of Industry and Trade,
Ceno teh delnic bo določilo Ministrstvo za finance v dogovoru z Ministrstvom za industrijo in trgovino.
the CCA transfers 10000 bonds with a nominal value of CZK 1 billion (EUR 35 million), issued by TŽ and currently held by CCA, back to their issuer, TŽ, for a total price of CZK 100 million (EUR 3,5 million), i.e. only 10 % of their nominal value.
Češka agencija za konsolidacijo prenese 10000 obveznic v nominalni vrednosti 1 milijarde CZK (35 milijonov EUR), ki jih je izdal TŽ in so trenutno v lasti Češke agencije za konsolidacijo, nazaj na izdajatelja, tj. TŽ, po skupni ceni 100 milijonov CZK (3,5 milijona EUR), tj. le 10 % njihove nominalne vrednosti.
The Resolution also stipulates that both transactions can only come into force after receiving a positive decision of the Czech Office for the Protection of Competition (OPC) issued following consultation with the European Commission.
Resolucija tudi določa, da lahko obe transakciji začneta veljati šele, ko češki Urad za varstvo konkurence izda pozitivno odločbo po opravljenem posvetu z Evropsko komisijo.
By letter dated 26 November 2003, the Commission requested information concerning the above mentioned transactions.
V dopisu z dne 26. novembra 2003 je Komisija zaprosila za informacije v zvezi z navedenimi transakcijami.
On 10 December 2003 and 7 January 2004 meetings were held between the Czech Prime Minister and Minister of Trade and Industry and the Commissioner for Competition.
decembra 2003 in 7. januarja 2004 so se sestali češki predsednik vlade, minister za trgovino in industrijo ter komisarka za konkurenco.
It was agreed that the last statement of the Resolution would be respected (see point 3).
Sklenjeno je bilo, da se spoštuje zadnji stavek Resolucije (glej točko 3).
On 20 February 2004 the Commission received a description of all the projects for which the Czech Government intended to grant State aid to TŽ.
Komisija je 20. februarja 2004 prejela opis vseh projektov, za katere je češka vlada nameravala dodeliti državno pomoč za TŽ.
On 17 March 2004 a technical consultation between the Commission departments, the representatives of the Czech authorities and the company took place in Brussels.
Strokovno posvetovanje med službami Komisije ter predstavniki čeških organov in družbe je potekalo 17. marca 2004 v Bruslju.
On 29 March and 29 April 2004 the Commission sent comments to the Czech authorities indicating that on the basis of the information provided it could not be excluded that the planned acquisition by the Czech Government of the INH shares held by TŽ would be done above the market price, thereby involving State aid in favour of the latter, and that State aid financing different TŽ projects did not seem to be compatible with the current Community State aid rules.
Komisija je 29. marca in 29. aprila 2004 poslala pripombe češkim organom, v katerih je navedla, da na podlagi predloženih informacij ni bilo mogoče izključiti možnosti, da bi se načrtovan odkup delnic INH, ki so v lasti TŽ, s strani češke vlade izvedel nad tržno ceno, kar pomeni državno pomoč v korist TŽ, in da se državna pomoč za financiranje različnih projektov TŽ ne zdi združljiva s trenutnimi predpisi Skupnosti o državni pomoči.
On 22 and 30 April 2004 the Czech Office for the Protection of Competition authorised the State aid to TŽ.
Češki Urad za varstvo konkurence je 22. in 30. aprila 2004 odobril državno pomoč za TŽ.
By letter dated 14 December 2004 the Commission informed the Czech Republic that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the measures and requested certain information.
V dopisu z dne 14. decembra 2004 je Komisija obvestila Češko, da se je glede ukrepov odločila sprožiti postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES, in zaprosila za določene informacije.
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measure.
Komisija je pozvala vse zainteresirane stranke, naj predložijo svoje pripombe o ukrepu.
By letters of 31 January 2005, registered as received on 1 February 2005, the Czech Republic replied to some questions raised in the decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure.
Češka je na nekaj vprašanj, zastavljenih v odločitvi o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave, odgovorila z dopisi z dne 31. januarja 2005, evidentiranimi 1. februarja 2005.
By letter of 18 April 2005, the Commission requested additional information, which was provided by letter of 16 May 2005, registered as received on 18 May 2005.
V dopisu z dne 18. aprila 2005 je Komisija zahtevala dodatne informacije, ki jih je prejela z dopisom z dne 16. maja 2005, evidentiranim 18. maja 2005.
By letter of 4 July 2005, the Commission requested a copy of certain documents quoted by the Czech authorities, which were submitted by letter of 21 July 2005, registered as received on 25 July 2005.
V dopisu z dne 4. julija 2005 je Komisija zahtevala kopijo nekaterih dokumentov, ki so jih navedli češki organi in ki so bili predloženi z dopisom z dne 21. julija 2005, evidentiranim 25. julija 2005.
By electronic mail of 10 August 2005, the Czech authorities informed the Commission about new elements.
Češki organi so v elektronskem sporočilu z dne 10. avgusta 2005 Komisijo obvestili o novih elementih.
By letter of 28 September 2005, the Commission requested additional information, which was submitted during a meeting with the Czech authorities on 29 September 2005 and by letter of 18 October 2005, registered as received on 19 October 2005.
V dopisu z dne 28. septembra 2005 je Komisija zahtevala dodatne informacije, ki jih je prejela med sestankom s češkimi organi dne 29. septembra 2005 in z dopisom z dne 18. oktobra 2005, evidentiranim 19. oktobra 2005.
By letter of 15 December 2005, the Commission requested further information, which was submitted by letter of 20 March 2006, registered as received on 21 March 2006.
V dopisu z dne 15. decembra 2005 je Komisija zahtevala dodatne informacije, ki jih je prejela z dopisom z dne 20. marca 2006, evidentiranim 21. marca 2006.
In this letter, the Czech authorities indicated that they would not pay the closure aid as TŽ had modified its business strategy.
V tem dopisu so češki organi navedli, da ne bodo plačali pomoči za zaprtje, ker je TŽ spremenil svojo poslovno strategijo.
By letter of 18 July 2006, the Commission requested further information, which was submitted by letter of 16 August 2006.
V dopisu z dne 18. julija 2006 je Komisija zahtevala dodatne informacije, ki jih je prejela z dopisom z dne 16. avgusta 2006.
Measures adopted in April 2004
Ukrepi, sprejeti aprila 2004
On 14 April 2004 the Government of the Czech Republic passed a resolution specifying that a purchase price of CZK 1250 per share would be paid to TŽ for the 1306920 INH shares in its possession, representing 10,54 % of the capital of this latter company.
Vlada Češke republike je 14. aprila 2004 sprejela resolucijo, v kateri navaja, da bo družbi TŽ za 1306920 delnic družbe INH v lasti TŽ, kar predstavlja 10,54 % kapitala te družbe, plačana nakupna cena v višini 1250 CZK za delnico.
On 22 April 2004 the OPC considered that this transaction did not involve State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Češki Urad za varstvo konkurence je 22. aprila 2004 dal mnenje, da ta transakcija ne pomeni državne pomoči v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
The transaction was executed at the end of that month.
Transakcija je bila izvedena ob koncu meseca aprila.
On 30 April 2004 the OPC authorised State aid in favour of TŽ provided in the form of a transfer of bonds in the total nominal value of approximately CZK 576,7 million (EUR 20 million) for environmental, research and development, training and closure projects for the years 2004-06.
Češki Urad za varstvo konkurence je 30. aprila 2004 odobril državno pomoč v korist TŽ v obliki prenosa obveznic v skupni nominalni vrednosti približno 576,7 milijona CZK (20 milijonov EUR) za okoljske, raziskovalne in razvojne projekte, projekte usposabljanja in projekte zapiranja za obdobje 2004–2006.
Part of this was aid of CZK 44088300 (EUR 1,5 million) for training projects and CZK 4152500 (EUR 0,14 million) for a closure project.
Del tega je bila pomoč v višini 44088300 CZK (1,5 milijona EUR) za projekte usposabljanja in 4152500 CZK (0,14 milijona EUR) za projekt zapiranja.
Information about the company
Informacije o družbi
TŽ was privatised in the mid-1990s and has been fully restructured without State support.
TŽ je bil privatiziran sredi 90. let prejšnjega stoletja in v celoti prestrukturiran brez državne podpore.
The main scope of business of TŽ is metallurgical (steel) production with a closed metallurgical cycle.
Glavno področje delovanja TŽ je metalurška proizvodnja (jekla) z zaprtim metalurškim ciklom.
Apart from production of coke, crude iron and steel, the main products of the company are the products produced by rolling mills, i.e. blooms, slabs, billets, rolled wire, reinforcing steel, and light, middle and heavy section steel.
Razen proizvodnje koksa ter surovega železa in jekla družba svoje glavne proizvode proizvaja v valjarni, tj. grude, bloke, palice, valjano žico, jeklo za ojačanje ter jeklo za lahke, srednje in težke profile.
TŽ is the only producer of rails in the Czech Republic.
TŽ je edini proizvajalec tirnic na Češkem.
The Commission decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure concerned three of the measures taken by the State in favour of TŽ, namely the shares purchase, the training aid, and the closure aid.
Odločitev Komisije o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave je zadevala tri državne ukrepe v korist TŽ, in sicer nakup delnic, pomoč za usposabljanje in pomoč za zaprtje.
The other aid measures (R&D and environmental protection) were found to comply with the relevant rules and are not the subject of the present procedure [4].
Za druge ukrepe pomoči (raziskave in razvoj ter varstvo okolja) je bilo ugotovljeno, da so skladni z ustreznimi predpisi in niso predmet zadevnega postopka [4].
In its decision to initiate the procedure, the Commission expressed doubts that these three measures implemented by the Czech Republic before accession involved disguised restructuring aid to TŽ, which would be in contradiction with Protocol 2 to the 2003 Accession Treaty (hereinafter Protocol 2).
Komisija je v svoji odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka izrazila dvom, da so navedeni trije ukrepi, ki jih je Češka izvedla pred pristopom, zajemali prikrito pomoč za prestrukturiranje v korist TŽ, kar bi bilo v nasprotju s Protokolom št. 2 k Pogodbi o pristopu iz leta 2003 (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Protokol št. 2“).
Regarding the training aid and the closure aid, the Commission had doubts that they complied with all the requirements of the corresponding Community State aid rules in force at the time the aid was granted [5].
Komisija je izrazila dvom, da sta pomoč za usposabljanje in pomoč za zaprtje skladni z vsemi zahtevami ustreznih predpisov Skupnosti o državni pomoči, ki so veljali v času, ko je bila pomoč dodeljena [5].
The documents submitted to the Commission in February and March 2004 were not clear about the objective and the conditions of these two aid measures.
V dokumentih, ki so bili predloženi Komisiji v februarju in marcu 2004, niso jasno opisani cilji in pogoji navedenih dveh ukrepov pomoči.
The vague information provided in the decisions of the OPC did not allow checking whether this aid had indeed been granted in line with the relevant rules.
Na podlagi nejasnih informacij, vsebovanih v odločitvah češkega Urada za varstvo konkurence, ni bilo mogoče preveriti, ali je bila ta pomoč resnično dodeljena v skladu z ustreznimi predpisi.