natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Since the measure was implemented without prior notification to the Commission and is incompatible with State aid rules, the Swedish authorities are required to recover the aid from the beneficiary.
Ker se je ukrep izvajal brez predhodne priglasitve Komisiji in ni združljiv s pravili o državni pomoči, morajo švedski organi oblasti od prejemnika pomoči izterjati vračilo pomoči.
It should be recalled, in this context, that the purpose of recovery is to restore the situation existing prior to the granting of the aid.
V zvezi s tem je treba spomniti, da je namen vračila ponovno vzpostaviti stanje pred dodelitvijo pomoči.
This is achieved once the unlawful and incompatible aid is repaid by the recipient, who thereby forfeits the advantage which he enjoyed over his competitors in the market.
To je vzpostavljeno, ko prejemnik pomoči, ki s tem izgubi prednost, ki jo je imel pred svojimi konkurenčnimi ponudniki na trgu, vrne nezakonito in nezdružljivo pomoč.
The amount to be recovered should be such as to eliminate the economic advantage given to the beneficiary.
Znesek, ki ga je treba izterjati, mora biti tak, da se odpravi gospodarska prednost prejemnika pomoči.
Since the aid to Konsum is equal to the difference between Lidl’s bid and the actual sale price — SEK 4,6 million (around EUR 0,5 million) — this is the aid amount to be recovered.
Ker je pomoč Konsumu enaka razliki med Lidlovo ponudbo in dejansko prodajno ceno, tj. 4,6 milijona SEK (približno 0,5 milijona EUR), je treba izterjati vračilo pomoči v tej višini.
Therefore, the Swedish authorities are required to recover from Konsum an amount of SEK 4,6 million plus the recovery interest, calculated according to Article 9 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [17].
Zato morajo švedski organi oblasti od Konsuma izterjati vračilo pomoči v višini 4,6 milijona SEK, ki se ji prišteje obrestna mera za vračilo, ki se izračuna na podlagi člena 9 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES [17].
Interest shall be payable from the date the unlawful aid was put at the disposal of Konsum until the date effective recovery takes place.
Obresti se plačajo od dne, ko je bila nezakonita pomoč dana na razpolago Konsumu, do dneva učinkovitega vračila.
The Commission finds that Sweden has unlawfully implemented, in breach of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty, the sale of land in question.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je Švedska s kršitvijo člena 88(3) Pogodbe ES nezakonito prodala zadevno zemljišče.
The Commission considers that such a measure, which constitutes pure operating aid, is not eligible for any derogation under the EC treaty, and is therefore incompatible with the common market.
Komisija meni, da tak ukrep, ki pomeni čisto pomoč za tekoče poslovanje, ni upravičen do nobenega odstopanja v skladu s Pogodbo ES in zato ni združljiv s skupnim trgom.
Therefore, the aid has to be recovered,
Zato je treba izterjati vračilo pomoči.
The State aid, amounting to SEK 4,6 million, unlawfully granted by Sweden, in breach of Article 88(3) of the Treaty, to Konsum Jämtland Ekonomisk Förening is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč v višini 4,6 milijona SEK, ki jo je Švedska s kršitvijo člena 88(3) Pogodbe nezakonito dodelila zadrugi Konsum Jämtland Ekonomisk Förening, ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
Sweden shall recover from the beneficiary the aid referred to in Article 1.
Švedska od prejemnika pomoči izterja vračilo pomoči iz člena 1.
The sum to be recovered shall bear interest for the entire period running from the date on which it was put at the disposal of the beneficiary until its actual recovery.
Vsoti, ki se vrne, se prištejejo obresti za celotno obdobje od dne, ko je bila dana na razpolago prejemniku pomoči, do njenega dejanskega vračila.
The interest shall be calculated as capitalised interest in conformity with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Obresti se izračunajo kot obresti, pripisane glavnici, v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004.
Recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 shall be immediate and effective.
Vračilo pomoči iz člena 1 je treba izvesti takoj in učinkovito.
Sweden shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months of the date of its notification.
Švedska zagotovi, da se ta odločba izvede v štirih mesecih po tem, ko je bila o njej obveščena.
Within two months of the notification of this Decision, Sweden shall submit the following information to the Commission:
Švedska v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tej odločbi Komisiji predloži naslednje informacije:
The total amount (principal and recovery interest) to be recovered from the beneficiary;
skupni znesek (glavnico in obresti izterjave), ki ga je treba izterjati od prejemnika pomoči;
A detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this decision;
podroben opis že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepov za uskladitev s to odločbo;
Documents demonstrating that the beneficiary has been ordered to repay the aid.
dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da je bilo prejemniku pomoči odrejeno, naj vrne pomoč.
Sweden shall keep the Commission informed about the progress of the national measures taken to implement the recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 until it has been completed.
Švedska Komisijo obvešča o napredku glede nacionalnih ukrepov, sprejetih za izterjavo vračila pomoči iz člena 1, dokler pomoč ni povrnjena.
It shall immediately submit, at the Commission’s request, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Švedska na zahtevo Komisije nemudoma predloži informacije o že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepih za izvajanje te odločbe.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiary.
Švedska predloži tudi podrobne informacije o višinah pomoči in obrestih za vračilo, ki jih je že izterjala od prejemnika pomoči.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Sweden.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Švedsko.
OJ C 204, 26.8.2006, p. 5.
UL C 204, 26.8.2006, str. 5.
Case C 35/06.
Zadeva C 35/06.
Source of data in this section: ‘Just-food.com’; 26 October 2007.
Vir podatkov za to poglavje: „Just-food.com“; 26. oktober 2007.
Source of data in this section: information submitted by the complainant and annual reports of Kooperativa Förbundet for 2005 and 2006.
Vir podatkov za to poglavje: informacije, ki jih je predložil pritožnik, in letni poročili Kooperativa Förbundet za leti 2005 in 2006.
A previous draft contract for the sale of the land for SEK 1 million did contain an obligation for Konsum to sell the city centre land within a deadline, but this clause was not present in the final contract.
Prejšnji osnutek pogodbe o prodaji zemljišča po ceni 1 milijon SEK je Konsum zavezoval k prodaji zemljišča v središču mesta v določenem roku, medtem ko končna pogodba ni vsebovala te določbe.
The sale itself occurred in October 2005.
Zemljišče je bilo prodano oktobra 2005.
An asset evaluator is defined as a person with appropriate academic qualifications and experience.
Cenilec je oseba s primerno izobrazbo in izkušnjami.
The evaluator must be independent, in the sense that the public authorities should not be entitled to issue orders as regards the result of the evaluation.
Cenilec mora biti pri izvajanju svojih nalog neodvisen, tj. javne oblasti ne smejo biti upravičene do dajanja navodil v zvezi z rezultatom vrednotenja.
State evaluation offices and public officers or employees are regarded as independent provided that undue influence on their findings is effectively excluded.
Državne cenilske pisarne in javni cenilci ali uslužbenci se štejejo kot neodvisni, če je učinkovito izključen neupravičen vpliv na njihove ugotovitve.
See, for example, Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 29 March 2007 in Case T-366/00 (‘Scott’).
Glej na primer sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 29. marca 2007 v zadevi T-366/00 („Scott“).
Source of data in this section: Annual report of Kooperativa Förbundet for 2005 and ‘Finland, retail food sector, 2003 report’ by the Global Agriculture Information Network.
Vir podatkov za to poglavje: Letno poročilo Kooperativa Förbundet za leto 2005 in „Finland, retail food sector, 2003 report [Poročilo o maloprodajnem trgu hrane na Finskem za leto 2003]“, ki ga je pripravila globalna informacijska kmetijska mreža.
Data refers to 2002 but is not expected to have changed significantly since.
Podatki so iz leta 2002, vendar se pričakuje, da se od takrat niso bistveno spremenili.
See, for example, paragraph 40 of the Judgment of the Court of 14 September 1994, Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities, Joined Cases C-278/92, C-279/92 and C-280/92.
Glej na primer odstavek 40 sodbe Sodišča z dne 14. septembra 1994, Kraljevina Španija proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, skupne zadeve C-278/92, C-279/92 in C-280/92.
See paragraphs 29-32 of the decision to open the formal investigation procedure.
Glej odstavke 29–32 odločitve o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave.
In this respect see, in particular, paragraphs 30 and 31 of the decision to open the formal investigation procedure.
V zvezi s tem glej zlasti odstavka 30 in 31 odločitve o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave.
OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1935/2006 (OJ L 407, 30.12.2006, p. 1).
UL L 140, 30.4.2004, str. 1.
It owns, among others, 42 % of Coop Norden, the second largest player in the Fast Moving Consumer Goods (hereinafter FMCG) sector in Sweden, with a market share of 16,2 % in 2005, and one of the largest players in Denmark and Norway.
Med drugim ima v lasti 42 % podjetja Coop Norden, drugega največjega ponudnika na švedskem trgu hitro premikajočega se blaga za široko porabo (v nadaljnjem besedilu „FMCG“), ki je imel leta 2005 16,2-odstotni tržni delež in je eden največjih ponudnikov na Danskem in Norveškem.
Kooperativa Förbundet is also active in real estate, media and other activities.
Kooperativa Förbundet je dejavna tudi na področju nepremičnin, medijev in drugih dejavnosti.
on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
o uporabi sredstev Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji v skladu s točko 28 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management [1], and in particular point 28 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju [1] in zlasti točke 28,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund [2], and in particular Article 12(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1927/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o ustanovitvi evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji [2] ter zlasti člena 12(3),
The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (the ‘Fund’) was established to provide additional support to workers who suffer from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market.
Evropski sklad je bil za prilagoditev globalizaciji (v nadaljnjem besedilu „sklad“) ustanovljen za zagotavljanje dodatne podpore delavcem, ki so jih prizadele posledice večjih strukturnih sprememb v svetovnih trgovinskih tokovih, in za pomoč pri njihovi ponovni vključitvi na trg dela.
The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million.
Medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 17. maja 2006 omogoča uporabo sredstev tega sklada do letne zgornje meje v višini 500 milijonov EUR.
On 12 September 2007 Malta submitted an application to deploy the Fund, in respect of redundancies in the textile sector, specifically for workers made redundant by VF (Malta) Ltd and Bortex Clothing Industry Co Ltd. The application complies with the requirements for determining the financial contributions as laid down in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.
Malta je 12. septembra 2007 vložila vlogo za uporabo tega sklada v zvezi z odpuščanjem presežnih delavcev v tekstilnem sektorju, zlasti delavcev, ki sta jih odpustili podjetji VF (Malta) Ltd in Bortex Clothing Ind Co Ltd. Vloga izpolnjuje zahteve za določitev finančnega prispevka, kot je določeno v členu 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 1927/2006.
On 9 October 2007 Portugal submitted an application to deploy the Fund, in respect of redundancies in the automobile sector, specifically for workers made redundant by Opel in Azambuja, Alcoa Fujikura in Seixal and Johnson Controls in Portalegre.
Portugalska je 9. oktobra 2007 vložila vlogo za uporabo sredstev tega sklada v zvezi z odpuščanjem presežnih delavcev v avtomobilskem sektorju, zlasti delavcev, ki so jih odpustila podjetja Opel v Azambuji, Alcoa Fujikura v Seixalu in Johnson Controls v Portalegru.
The application complies with the requirements for determining the financial contributions as laid down in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.
Vloga izpolnjuje zahteve za določitev finančnega prispevka, kot je določeno v členu 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 1927/2006.
The Fund should, therefore, be mobilised in order to provide a financial contribution for the applications,
Zato je treba uporabiti sredstva tega sklada, da bo zagotovljen finančni prispevek za obe vlogi –
For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2008, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 3106882 in commitment and payment appropriations.
Za splošni proračun Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2008 bodo uporabljena sredstva iz Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji, in sicer 3106882 EUR v odobritvah za prevzem obveznosti in za plačila.
amending the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management as regard adjustment of the multiannual financial framework
o spremembi Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju v zvezi s prilagoditvijo večletnega finančnega okvira
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management [1], and in particular to point 48 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju [1] in zlasti točke 48 Sporazuma,
As a result of delays in the adoption of certain operational programmes of headings 1b and 2, EUR 2034 million in current prices of the allocation provided for the Structural Funds, the Cohesion Fund, Rural Development and the European Fund for Fisheries could not be committed in 2007 nor carried over to 2008.
Zaradi zamud pri sprejemanju določenih operativnih programov v razdelkih 1b in 2 v letu 2007 ni bilo mogoče prevzeti obveznosti za 2034 milijonov EUR v tekočih cenah proračunskih sredstev, predvidenih za strukturne sklade, Kohezijski sklad, Sklad za razvoj podeželja in Evropski sklad za ribištvo, niti jih prenesti v leto 2008.
Under point 48 of the Interinstitutional Agreement, this amount must be transferred to subsequent financial years by increasing the corresponding expenditure ceilings for commitment appropriations.
V skladu s točko 48 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma je treba ta znesek prenesti na naslednja proračunska leta s povišanjem ustreznih zgornjih mej odhodkov za odobritve za prevzem obveznosti.
Annex I of the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management should therefore be amended accordingly [2],
Prilogo I Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti [2] –
For that purpose, the figures in current prices are converted into 2004 prices.
Za ta namen je treba številke v tekočih cenah preračunati v cene iz leta 2004.
Financial framework 2007-2013
Finančni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013
(EUR million — constant 2004 prices)
(v mio EUR – v cenah iz leta 2004)
Committee appropriations
Odobritve za prevzem obveznosti
Total 2007-2013
2007–2013 skupaj
Sustainable growth
Trajnostna rast
Competitiveness for growth and employment
Konkurenčnost za rast in zaposlovanje
Cohesion for growth and employment
Kohezija za rast in zaposlovanje
Preservation and management of natural resources
Ohranjanje in upravljanje naravnih virov
Total commitment appropriations
Odobritve za prevzem obveznosti skupaj
Total payment appropriations
Odobritve plačil skupaj
Own resources ceiling as percentage of GNI
Zgornja meja lastnih sredstev kot odstotek BND
concerning the conclusion of the Agreement amending the Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000
o sklenitvi Sporazuma o spremembi Sporazuma o partnerstvu med članicami skupine afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi, podpisanega v Cotonouju dne 23. junija 2000
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 310 thereof, in conjunction with the second sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 310 v povezavi z drugim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) in drugim pododstavkom člena 300(3) Pogodbe,
Pursuant to Article 96 of the Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part [2] (hereafter referred to as ‘the Partnership Agreement’), a Party which, after having conducted a strengthened political dialogue, considers that another Party fails to fulfil an obligation in respect of one of the essential elements referred to in Article 9 of the Partnership Agreement may invite the other Party to hold consultations and, in certain circumstances, take appropriate measures, including where necessary the partial or full suspension of application of the Partnership Agreement to the Party concerned.
Na podlagi člena 96 Sporazuma o partnerstvu med članicami skupine afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Sporazum o partnerstvu“) lahko pogodbenica, ki kljub okrepljenemu političnemu dialogu meni, da katera od drugih pogodbenic ne izpolnjuje obveznosti v zvezi s katerim od bistvenih elementov iz člena 9 Sporazuma o partnerstvu, povabi to pogodbenico, da začne posvetovanja in lahko v določenih okoliščinah sprejme ustrezne ukrepe, po potrebi vključno z delno ali popolno odložitvijo izvajanja Sporazuma o partnerstvu za zadevno pogodbenico.
Pursuant to Article 97 of the Partnership Agreement, a Party which considers that a serious case of corruption has occurred may invite the other Party to hold consultations and, in certain circumstances, take appropriate measures, including where necessary the partial or full suspension of application of the Partnership Agreement to the Party concerned.
Na podlagi člena 97 Sporazuma o partnerstvu lahko pogodbenica, ki meni, da se je zgodil posebno hud primer korupcije, povabi drugo pogodbenico k posvetovanju in lahko v določenih okoliščinah sprejme ustrezne ukrepe, po potrebi vključno z delno ali popolno odložitvijo izvajanja Sporazuma o partnerstvu za zadevno pogodbenico.
Pursuant to Article 11b of the Partnership Agreement, a Party which, after having conducted a strengthened political dialogue, informed in particular by reports by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) and other relevant multilateral institutions, considers that the other Party has failed to fulfil an obligation stemming from paragraph 1 of that article on non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, is to invite the other party to hold consultations and, in certain circumstances, take appropriate measures, including where necessary the partial or full suspension of application of the Partnership Agreement to the party concerned.
Na podlagi člena 11b Sporazuma o partnerstvu lahko pogodbenica, ki kljub okrepljenemu političnemu dialogu meni, zlasti na podlagi poročil Mednarodne agencije za atomsko energijo (IAEA), Organizacije za prepoved kemičnega orožja (OPCW) in drugih ustreznih multilateralnih organizacij, da druga pogodbenica ne izpolnjuje obveznosti v zvezi s preprečevanjem širjenja orožja za množično uničevanje, ki izhajajo iz odstavka 1 omenjenega člena, povabi drugo podpisnico k posvetovanju in lahko v določenih okoliščinah sprejme ustrezne ukrepe, po potrebi vključno z delno ali popolno odložitvijo izvajanja Sporazuma o partnerstvu za zadevno pogodbenico.
An effective procedure should be adopted when it is intended to take appropriate measures under Article 96, Article 97, or paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 of Article 11b of the Partnership Agreement.
Za sprejemanje ustreznih ukrepov na podlagi člena 96, člena 97 ali odstavkov 4, 5 in 6 člena 11b Sporazuma o partnerstvu bi bilo treba sprejeti učinkovit postopek.
The Agreement amending the Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000 should be approved,
Sporazum o spremembi Sporazuma o partnerstvu med članicami skupine afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi, podpisanega v Cotonouju dne 23. junija 2000, bi bilo treba odobriti –
The Agreement amending the Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000, and the declarations made by the Community unilaterally or jointly with other parties and attached to the Final Act, are hereby approved on behalf of the European Community [3].Article 2
Sporazum o spremembi Sporazuma o partnerstvu med članicami skupine afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi, podpisanega v Cotonouju dne 23. junija 2000, skupaj z enostranskimi izjavami Skupnosti in skupnimi izjavami Skupnosti in drugih pogodbenic, ki so priložene Sklepni listini, se odobri v imenu Evropske skupnosti [3].Člen 2
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to deposit the instrument of approval as required by Article 93 of the Partnership Agreement on behalf of the European Community.
Predsednik Sveta je pooblaščen, da imenuje osebo(-e), pooblaščeno(-e) za deponiranje listine o odobritvi iz člena 93 Sporazuma o partnerstvu v imenu Evropske skupnosti.