natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Moreover, even though there has not been a direct and clear transfer of State resources, State resources are involved, cf. case C-200/97, Ecotrade v. AFS [1998] ECR-I-7907, par. 43, Joined cases T-204/97 and T-270/97, EPAC [2000] ECR-II-2267, par. 80 and 81. [19] National regional state aid map for the Netherlands 2000-2006 (State aid N 228/2000, ref. SG (2000) D/106075 of 8.8.2000).
Tudi če ni bilo nobenega neposrednega in očitnega prenosa državnih sredstev, so bila vpletena državna sredstva, glej sodbo z dne 1. decembra 1998 v zadevi C-200/97, Ecotrade proti AFS, PSES str. I-7907, točka 43, in sodbo z dne 13. junija 2000 v združenih zadevah T-204/97 in T-270/97, EPAC, PSES str. II-2267, točki 80 in 81.
Guidelines on national regional aid, OJ C 74, 10.03.1998.
Karta regionalnih pomoči na Nizozemskem 2000–2006 (Državna pomoč N 228/2000, ref. SG(2000) D/106075 z dne 8. avgusta 2000).
Cf. Guidelines, Chapter 2, scope, p. 10.
Smernice za regionalne pomoči, UL C 74, 10.3.1998.
This approach was also followed by the Commission in other cases, see for instance: State aid decisions for the UK: N126/04 ‘Broadband for SMEs in Lincolnshire’ of 14.12.2004, N199/04 ‘Broadband business fund’ of 16.11.2004, N307/04 ‘Broadband in Scotland — remote and rural areas’ of 16.11.2004(See: http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/).
Glej smernice, poglavje 2, področje uporabe, str. 10.
European Commission (2006), European Electronic Communications Regulation and Markets 2005 (11th Report) COM (2006)68 of 20.02.2006.. According to the data of October 2005, the fixed incumbent's market share of fixed broadband retail lines is approx. 44 %, and its market share of DSL retail lines is approx. 72 %. Moreover, the incumbent's market share of DSL retail lines is decreasing further; The OECD broadband statistics of December 2005 also show that the Netherlands are one of the leading countries in broadband: www.oecd.org/sti/ict/broadband.
Komisija je imela tak pristop tudi v drugih zadevah, glej na primer odločbe o državnih pomočeh v Združenem kraljestvu: N126/04 „Širokopasovne storitve za MSP v Lincolnshiru“ z dne 14. decembra 2004, N199/04 „Poslovni sklad za širokopasovne storitve“ z dne 16. novembra 2004, N307/04 „Širokopasovne povezave na Škotskem – podeželska in oddaljena območja“ z dne 16. novembra 2004.(glej http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/).
According to information in the possession of the Commission, Essent is testing a symmetrical Ethernet-to-the-Home solution providing 100Mbit/s, UPC plans to introduce a 50 Mbit/s product in the Netherlands in 2006 and KPN is rolling-out VDSL with a speed of >50 Mbit/s.
„Pravna ureditev in trgi evropskih elektronskih komunikacij 2005“ (enajsto poročilo) COM(2006) 68 z dne 20. februarja 2006. Po podatkih iz oktobra 2005 je imel uveljavljeni operater približno 44-odstotni tržni delež za fiksne širokopasovne povezave zakupljenih vodov na maloprodajnem trgu in približno 72-odstotni tržni delež za DSL priključke na maloprodajnem trgu. Tržni delež operaterja fiksne telefonije za DSL priključke na maloprodajnem trgu se še zmanjšuje. Sicer statistični podatki o širokopasovnih povezavah, ki jih je decembra objavil OECD, kažejo, da je Nizozemska med vodilnimi državami na področju širokopasovnih storitev: www.oecd.org/sti/ict/broadband.
See for instance OPTA: KPN's Next Generation Network: All-IP, Issue Paper, 22 May 2006.
Po podatkih, ki jih ima Komisija, Essent trenutno testira simetrično rešitev Ethernet-to-the-Home s hitrostjo 100 Mbit/s, UPC pripravlja uvedbo proizvoda s hitrostjo 50 Mbits/s, KPN pa razvija storitve VSDL, ki lahko dosežejo hitrost prenosa do 50 Mbit/s.
Cf. http://145.7.218.175/covcheck/main.asp andhttp://umtscoveragetool.vodafone.nl/UMTSdekking.html#.
Glej npr. OPTA: KPN's Next Generation Network: All-IP, Issue Paper, 22. maj 2006.
The website of KPN mentions that UMTS is available to 9 million people in 130 cities in the Netherlands:http://www.kpn.com/kpn/show/id=716554.
Prim. http://145.7.218.175/covcheck/main.asp in http://umtscoveragetool.vodafone.nl/UMTSdekking.html#.
There is still a small percentage of the Dutch population which does not have access to broadband, for instance because they live too far from a local exchange to be able to use Digital subscriber line (DSL) services and/or have no access to a cable TV network.
Na spletni strani podjetja KPN je navedeno, da je UMTS na voljo 9 milijonom ljudem v 130 mestih na Nizozemskem: http://www.kpn.com/kpn/show/id=716554.
CPB report, p. 103.
Manjši odstotek nizozemskega prebivalstva še vedno nima dostopa do širokopasovnih storitev, zlasti ker živijo predaleč od lokalne centrale, da bi lahko uporabljali storitve Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) in/ali nimajo dostopa do omrežja kabelske televizije.
KPN has significant market power in the markets for wholesale unbundled access and specific wholesale leased lines. Therefore, KPN is subject to access regulation concerning important inputs for the provision of broadband services, such as local loops or wholesale leased lines. Moreover, KPN provides voluntarily access to certain wholesale broadband services.
Poročilo CPB, str. 103.
For example, Essent is providing WBA to the ISP Introweb (although limited to business customers), the cable operators Stichting CAI Harderwijk and Kabel Noord are providing WBA to the ISP Chello and the cable operator Cogas is providing WBA to the ISP @Home; cf. case NL/2005/0281 Wholesale Broadband Access in the Netherlands — Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC of 2 December 2005.
KPN ima znatno tržno moč na trgih za veleprodajo razvezanega dostopa in pri posebni veleprodaji zakupljenih vodov. Zato mora KPN upoštevati ureditev o dostopu za pomembne vložke pri zagotavljanju širokopasovnih storitev, kot so krajevne zanke in veleprodaja zakupljenih vodov. Poleg tega KPN prostovoljno zagotavlja dostop do nekaterih širokopasovnih storitev.
In the recent Irish case N284/05 ‘Regional Broadband Programme — Metropolitan Area Networks (MANs), phases 2 and 3’, Commission decision of 8 March 2006, the Commission accepted State support for the roll-out of open wholesale infrastructure, including geographic areas where the historic operator already provided basic broadband services, in view of the serious ‘broadband gap’ and the peculiarities of the Irish market (lack of alternative infrastructures, population distribution patterns, very late introduction of broadband by the incumbent, etc.).
Na „belih območjih“ sploh ni širokopasovnih povezav. „Siva območja“ so podobna naravnemu monopolu, kjer omrežje nadzoruje en sam operater, ki ne omogoča dostopa do njegove temeljne infrastrukture. Vendar pa Appingedam lahko velja za „črno območje“, kjer so na trgu dostopne različne širokopasovne storitve preko najmanj dveh konkurenčnih infrastruktur (na primer telefonsko in kabelsko televizijsko omrežje). V primeru projektov, namenjenih izključno „črnim območjem“, obstaja veliko tveganje, da bo javno financiranje izrinilo sedanje in prihodnje zasebne naložbe.
See, for instance, UK Broadband Stakeholder Group, Predicting UK Future Residential Bandwidth Requirements, May 2006; IDATE, Etude sur le développement du très haut débit en France, March 2006.
V nedavni irski zadevi N284/05 „Regionalni širokopasovni program – faza II in faza III programa Metropolitan Area Network (MAN)“, Odločba Komisije z dne 8. marca 2006, je Komisija odobrila državno pomoč za razvoj odprte veleprodajne infrastrukture, zlasti v geografskih regijah, kjer je uveljavljeni operater že zagotavljal osnovne širokopasovne storitve, to pa zaradi velike širokopasovne vrzeli in posebnih značilnosti irskega trga (pomanjkljivost alternativnih infrastruktur, razporeditev prebivalstva, uveljavljeni operater pozno uvedel širokopasovne storitve itd.).
Page 14 of mentioned CPB report.
Glej na primer UK Broadband Stakeholder Group, „Predicting UK Future Residential Bandwidth Requirements“, maj 2006; IDATE, „Etude sur le développement du très haut débit en France“, marec 2006. [35] Str. 14 v zadevnem poročilu CPB.
The CPB investigated the possible presence of market failure in the broadband market in the Netherlands and found that there are no significant market failures present in the Dutch broadband market.
CPB je izvedel preiskavo o domnevnih tržnih nepopolnostih na nizozemskem širokopasovnem trgu in zaključil, da na tem trgu ni znatnih tržnih nepopolnosti.
Policy measures can, according to the report, hardly be based on the argument of market failure.
Poročilo navaja, da strateški ukrepi ne morejo temeljiti na utemeljitvi tržne nepopolnosti.
These funds thus have to be considered as State resources. Economic advantage
Prednost za nekatera podjetja ali vrste proizvodnje
Whereas residential users are not subject to State aid rules, businesses in the targeted geography may benefit from service coverage beyond and prices below what would be provided purely on a commercial basis like currently offered leased line offers or satellite connections.
Pravila o državnih pomočeh ne veljajo za gospodinjstva, vendar pa bi podjetja na zadevnem območju imela koristi zaradi širše ponudbe storitev in nižjih cen v primerjavi s ponudbami zakupljenih vodov ali satelitskimi povezavami, ki bi jim bile dostopne na izključno tržni podlagi.
In addition, they may enjoy an advantage in comparison to businesses located in other regions of the Netherlands.
Poleg tega bi imela prednost v primerjavi s podjetji v drugih regijah na Nizozemskem.
The Dutch authorities have in addition brought forward that the end-users are all small to medium sized enterprises (SME) but they have not motivated why aid to this group would be justified.
Nizozemski organi so poleg tega trdili, da so končni uporabniki izključno mala in srednja podjetja (MSP), ne da bi navedli, zakaj je ta skupina upravičena do pomoči.
In addition, the aid measure is not only limited to the end-users.
Poleg tega je jasno, da pomoč ni omejena samo na končne uporabnike.
The Commission acknowledges that the advantage for each of the business end users could be below de minimis aid thresholds.
Komisija priznava, da prednost posameznega podjetja kot končnega uporabnika ne presega de minimis praga.
However, it cannot be excluded that the aid exceeds the limits set out in that Regulation or violates the non-cumulation requirements.
Vendar pa ni izključeno, da pomoč presega mejne zneske iz zadevne uredbe ali da je v nasprotju s pravili o kumulaciji pomoči.
The envisaged intervention by the State alters the existing market conditions in Appingedam by enabling subsidised entry into the wholesale market for fast broadband services (the operator) as well as allowing service providers to enter in the downstream markets of, inter alia, retail broadband and retail telecommunications services.
Načrtovano posredovanje organov oblasti spreminja obstoječe tržne pogoje v Appingedamu, ker omogoča subvencioniran dostop na veleprodajni trg hitrih širokopasovnih storitev (operater) in ker omogoča ponudnikom storitev, da med drugim vstopijo na maloprodajne trge širokopasovnih in komunikacijskih storitev nižje v verigi.
In making their decisions regarding network investment and maintenance, the existing providers Essent and KPN have based their calculations on the assumption that other providers of electronic communications services would have had to bear the full costs of a new network or pay a market price for access to wholesale services, which appears to be no longer the case after the envisaged State intervention.
Ko sta se obstoječa ponudnika Essent in KPN odločila, da bosta vzdrževala in vlagala v omrežje, sta pri izračunih domnevala, da bi morali drugi ponudniki elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev nositi celotne stroške novega omrežja ali bi morali plačati tržno ceno dostopa do veleprodajnih storitev, kar po predvidenem posredovanju organov oblasti ne bi več veljalo.
Moreover, third-generation mobile operators are currently rolling out mobile broadband services in the Netherlands, and around 70 % of the Dutch territory is, according to the information available to the Commission already covered by these services. These market-driven roll-out plans show that public intervention risks crowding-out private initiative.
Po podatkih Komisije je pokritost s temi storitvami na Nizozemskem približno 70-odstotna.
‘White areas’ have no broadband provision at all, ‘grey areas’ are similar to a natural monopoly where the network is controlled by a single operator not granting access to its basic infrastructure.
Essent na primer zagotavlja WBA za ISP Introweb (za profesionalne uporabnike), kabelska operaterja CAI Harderwijk in Kabel Noord zagotavljata WBA za ISP Chello, kabelski operater Cogas pa zagotavlja WBA za ISP @Home.
Appingedam, however, can be considered a ‘black area’ in which the market situation is characterized by the availability of different broadband services over at least 2 competing infrastructures (such as telephone and cable TV networks). For projects covering ‘black areas’ only, there is a high risk that state intervention crowds out existing and future private investments.
Glej zadevo NL/2005/0281 Dostop do veleprodajnih širokopasovnih storitev na Nizozemskem – pripombe v skladu s členom 7(3) Direktive 2002/21/ES z dne 2. decembra 2005.
The Commission has further laid down other guidelines and frameworks defining rules for aid that may fall under the exemption foreseen in Article 87(3)(c). None of these guidelines applies to the present case.
Komisija je poleg tega pripravila druge smernice in okvirne predpise, ki določajo pravila za državne pomoči, ki utegnejo priti v poštev glede izjeme iz člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe.
There is therefore, at least currently, no explicit provision in the European regulatory framework for electronic communications to offer third party access to duct or fibre infrastructure, Commission Recommendation 2003/311/EC of 11 February 2003 on relevant product and service markets within the electronic communications sector susceptible to ex ante regulation in accordance with Directive 2002/21/EC., OJ L 114 of 8 May 2003, p. 45 ff..
Sporočilo Komisije o upoštevnih trgih za elektronske telekomunikacijske storitve ne vključuje nobenega trga za grosistični dostop do vodov ali temnih (neosvetljenih) vlaken. Zato evropski ureditveni okvir za elektronske komunikacije zaenkrat ne vsebuje izrecnih določb o dostopu tretje osebe do infrastrukture iz vodov ali vlaken.
See footnote 6.
Priporočilo Komisije 2003/311/ES z dne 11. februarja 2003 o upoštevnih trgih izdelkov in storitev v sektorju elektronskih komunikacij, občutljivem na predhodno pravno ureditev v skladu z Direktivo 2002/21/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve (UL L 114, 8.5.2003, str. 45).
establishing a list of standards and/or specifications for electronic communications networks, services and associated facilities and services and replacing all previous versions
Seznam standardov oziroma specifikacij za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja, storitve ter pripadajoče zmogljivosti in storitve, ki nadomesti vse predhodne različice
(notified under document number C(2006) 6364)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 6364)
Having regard to Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) and in particular Article 17(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2002/21/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve (Okvirna direktiva) in zlasti člena 17(1) Direktive,
Having consulted the Communications Committee,
po posvetovanju z Odborom za komunikacije,
An interim ‘List of standards and/or specifications for encouraging the harmonised provision of electronic communications networks, electronic communications services and associated facilities and services’ has been published in the Official Journal of the European Communities
Vmesni „Seznam standardov oziroma specifikacij za spodbujanje usklajenega zagotavljanja elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij, elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev ter pripadajočih naprav in storitev“ je bil objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti.
The interim list of standards referred to both the regulatory framework under Council Directive 90/387/EEC and the regulatory framework in force, under Directive 2002/21/EC.
Vmesni seznam standardov se sklicuje na regulativni okvir na podlagi Direktive 90/387/EGS in veljavni regulativni okvir na podlagi Direktive 2002/21/ES.
Additions and modifications to that list were made in March 2006.
Dodatki k navedenemu seznamu in njegove spremembe so bile narejeni marca 2006.
It is therefore necessary to move beyond the interim list and to draw up and publish a list of standards to replace the abovementioned publications.
Zato je treba preseči vmesni seznam ter sestaviti in objaviti seznam standardov, da se nadomestijo zgoraj omenjene objave.
The revised list of standards has been drawn up in cooperation with experts from Member States and the European Telecommunication Standards Institute (ETSI),
Revidirani seznam standardov je bil sestavljen v sodelovanju s strokovnjaki iz držav članic in Evropskim inštitutom za telekomunikacijske standarde (ETSI) –
List of Standards
Seznam standardov
The List of Standards and/or specifications for electronic communications networks, services and associated facilities and services is established.
Seznam standardov oziroma specifikacij za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja, storitve ter pripadajoče zmogljivosti in storitve je vzpostavljen.
It shall replace the previous versions of the List of Standards published on 31 December 2002 and 23 March 2006.
Nadomestil bo predhodni različici Seznama standardov, ki sta bili objavljeni dne 31. decembra 2002 in 23. marca 2006.
This publication is in addition to the list of standards for the minimum set of leased lines published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 25 July 2003.
Ta objava se kot dodatek k seznamu standardov o minimalnem naboru zakupljenih vodov dne 25. julija 2003 objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The List of Standards, as set out in the Annex, shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Seznam standardov, kot je določen v Prilogi, se objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
OJ C 331, 31.12.2002, p. 32.
UL C 331, 31.12.2002, str. 32.
OJ C 71, 23.3.2006, p. 9.
UL C 71, 23.3.2006, str. 9.
List of standards and/or specifications for electronic communications networks, services and associated facilities and services
Seznam standardov OZIROMA specifikacij za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja, storitve ter pripadajoče zmogljivosti in storitve
EXPLANATORY NOTE CONCERNING THIS ISSUE OF THE LIST OF STANDARDS AND/OR SPECIFICATIONS FOR ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, SERVICES AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES AND SERVICES
POJASNEVALNA OPOMBA O TEJ IZDAJI SEZNAMA STANDARDOV OZIROMA SPECIFIKACIJ ZA ELEKTRONSKA KOMUNIKACIJSKA OMREŽJA, STORITVE TER PRIPADAJOČE ZMOGLJISVOSTI IN STORITVE
In accordance with Article 17(1) of the Framework Directive (2002/21/EC) the Commission draws up and publishes in the Official Journal of the European Communities a list of standards and/or specifications which serve as a basis for encouraging the harmonised provision of electronic communications networks, electronic communications services and associated facilities and services, to ensure interoperability of services and to improve freedom of choice for users.
Komisija v skladu s postopkom iz člena 17(1) Okvirne direktive (2002/21/ES) za zagotovitev medobratovalnosti storitev in boljšo izbiro za uporabnike sestavi seznam standardov oziroma specifikacij, ki bi bili podlaga za spodbujanje usklajenega zagotavljanja elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij, elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev ter pripadajočih naprav in storitev, ter jih objavi v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti.
This publication replaces the former interim List of Standards (2002/C 331/04) which referred to both the ‘old’ regulatory framework (i.e. Article 5 of Directive 90/387/EEC as amended by Directive 97/51/EC) and the current regulatory framework (i.e. Article 17 of the Framework Directive 2002/21/EC).
Ta objava nadomesti nekdanji vmesni seznam standardov (2002/C 331/04), ki se je skliceval na „stari“ (tj. člen 5 Direktive 90/387/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 97/51/ES) in tudi veljavni regulativni okvir (tj. člen 17 Okvirne direktive 2002/21/ES).
This publication also replaces the ‘interactive digital television’ amendment to the List of Standards (2006/C 71/04) of 23 March 2006.The minimum set of leased lines with harmonised characteristics and associated standards referred to in Article 18 of Directive 2002/22/EC (Universal Service Directive), published in Commission Decision (2003/548/EC) of 24 July 2003 is not affected by publication of this List of Standards.In accordance with Art 17(2) of the Framework Directive, in the absence of standards and/or specifications in this list, Member States must encourage the implementation of standards and/or specifications adopted by European standards organisations and, in the absence of such standards and/or specifications, encourage the implementation of international standards or recommendations adopted by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) or the International Electro technical Commission (IEC).
Ta objava tudi nadomesti spremembo v zvezi s seznamom standardov „interaktivne digitalne televizije“ (2006/C 71/04) z dne 23. marca 2006. Objava tega seznama standardov ne vpliva na minimalni nabor zakupljenih vodov z usklajenimi značilnostmi in pripadajočimi standardi iz člena 18 Direktive 2002/22/ES (Direktiva o univerzalni storitvi), objavljene v Sklepu Komisije (2003/548/ES) z dne 24. julija 2003.V skladu s členom 17(2) Okvirne direktive v odsotnosti standardov oziroma specifikacij v tem seznamu države članice spodbujajo uporabo standardov oziroma specifikacij, ki so jih sprejele evropske organizacije za standardizacijo in, ob odsotnosti takih standardov oziroma specifikacij, spodbujajo izvajanje mednarodnih standardov ali priporočil, ki so jih sprejele Mednarodna telekomunikacijska zveza (ITU), Mednarodna organizacija za standardizacijo (ISO) ali Mednarodna elektrotehniška komisija (IEC).
The present publication is a selective list of standards and/or specifications in the areas concerned.
Sedanja objava je selektiven seznam standardov oziroma specifikacij na zadevnih področjih.
Compared to the interim list of standards (2002/C 331/04), fewer standards and/or specifications have been included, recognising that Article 17(2) of the Framework Directive already requires Member States to encourage the use of standards or specifications adopted by the European Standardisation Organisations other than those published in the List of Standards.
V primerjavi z vmesnim seznamom standardov (2002/C 331/04) je bilo vnesenih manj standardov oziroma specifikacij, ob priznavanju, da člen 17(2) Okvirne direktive od držav članic že zahteva, da spodbujajo uporabo standardov ali specifikacij, ki so jih sprejele evropske organizacije za standardizacijo, ki pa niso objavljeni v seznamu standardov.
This list of standards has been produced taking into account following criteria.
Ta seznam standardov je bil izdelan ob upoštevanju naslednjih meril.
These criteria were drawn up in cooperation with Member States in the Communications Committee and subsequently validated via a public consultation.
Ta merila so bila sestavljena v sodelovanju z državami članicami v Odboru za komunikacije in nato preverjena s pomočjo javnega posvetovanja.
The revised list should include standards and/or specifications:
Pregledani seznam mora vključevati standarde oziroma specifikacije: