natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Taking into account that the State guarantee has been terminated and the loan has been repaid, meaning that there was an advantage for HLW equivalent to an interest subsidy of EUR 1645682, this advantage should be reimbursed.
Ob upoštevanju dejstva, da se je državno jamstvo izteklo in da je bilo posojilo odplačano, kar pomeni, da je imela družba HLW prednost, ki ustreza subvencioniranim obrestim v višini 1645682 EUR, je treba to prednost povrniti.
Given that on 20 November 2007 AHW voluntarily repaid into the blocked account EUR 2089768, corresponding to the amount to be recovered plus compound interest, to be received by the Polish authorities as of the day of issuance of this decision, no further recovery is necessary.
Glede na to, da je 20. novembra 2007 družba AHW na zamrznjen račun prostovoljno nakazala 2089768 EUR, kar ustreza znesku, ki ga je treba vrniti skupaj z obrestnimi obrestmi, ki bi jih morali poljski organi prejeti na dan izdaje te odločbe, ni potrebno nobeno dodatno vračilo.
Moreover, provided that this aid is reimbursed, the Commission can, under point (10) of Protocol No 8, approve the change of plan as indicated in the 2005 IBP, as it does not involve additional aid and reinforces the viability of the firm,
Poleg tega lahko Komisija, če je ta pomoč povrnjena, na podlagi točke 10 Protokola št. 8 odobri spremembo načrta, kot je navedena v načrtu IPN iz leta 2005, saj ne vključuje dodatne pomoči in krepi rentabilnost podjetja –
State aid of EUR 1645682 granted to HLW/AHW by Poland in breach of point (18) of Protocol No 8 has been misused by HLW/AHW and is incompatible with the common market.
Državno pomoč v višini 1645682 EUR, ki jo je Poljska dodelila družbi HLW/AHW v nasprotju s točko 18 Protokola št. 8, je družba HLW/AHW zlorabila, državna pomoč pa je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
In view of the repayment of the misused aid referred to in Article 1, the Commission has no objections to AHW’s amendment of its business plan.
Zaradi vrnitve zlorabljene pomoči iz člena 1 Komisija ne nasprotuje spremembi poslovnega načrta, ki jo izvede družba AHW.
OJ C 35, 17.2.2007, p. 41.
UL C 35, 17.2.2007, str. 41.
Assuming that EUR 1 = PLN 4.
Ob predpostavki, da 1 EUR znaša 4 PLN.
Council Decision of 21 July 2003, OJ L 199, 7.8.2003, p. 17.
Odločba Sveta z dne 21. julija 2003, UL L 199, 7.8.2003, str. 17. Prim.
Cf. Commission Decision in Case C 20/04, OJ L 366, 21.12.2006, p. 1, points 23 et seq.
Odločbo Komisije v zadevi C–20/04, UL L 366, 21.12.2006, str. 1, točka 23 in naslednje.
Cf. Communication from the Commission on Rescue and Restructuring aid and closure aid for the steel sector OJ C 70, 19.3.2002, p. 21, which prohibits restructuring aid to the steel industry.
Prim. Sporočilo Komisije o pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje ter pomoči za zaprtje v jeklarskem sektorju, UL C 70, 19.3.2002, str. 21, ki prepoveduje pomoč za prestrukturiranje za jeklarsko industrijo.
According to the latest monitoring report of June 2007, PLN 2,727 billion of aid has been disbursed.
V skladu z zadnjim poročilom o spremljanju iz junija 2007 je bila izplačana pomoč v višini 2,727 milijarde PLN. Od osmih prejemnikov pomoči so tri družbe, in sicer Technolgie Buczek (prim.
Out of the eight beneficiaries, three companies, namely Technolgie Buczek (cf. Commission Decision of 23 October 2007 in Case C 23/06, not yet published), Huta Andrzej and Huta Batory have in the meantime gone into liquidation, while four companies, namely Polskie Huty Stali S.A. (now Mittal Steel Poland, see Commission Decision in Case N 186/05, Change of IBP of MSP), Huta Bankowa, Huta Labędy and Huta Pokόj, have restored viability.
Odločbo Komisije z dne 23. oktobra 2007 v zadevi C 23/06, še neobjavljena), Huta Andrzej in Huta Batory, med tem šle v likvidacijo, štiri družbe, in sicer Polskie Huty Stali S.A (zdaj Mittal Steel Poljska, glej Odločbo Komisije v zadevi N 186/05, Sprememba IPN družbe MSP), Huta Bankowa, Huta Labędy in Huta Pokόj pa so ponovno vzpostavile rentabilnost.
See Commission Decision Mittal/Arcelor of 2 June 2006, Case No COMP/M.4137.
Glej Odločbo Komisije Mittal/Arcelor z dne 2. junija 2006, zadeva št. COMP/M.4137.
Cf. information submission of Poland of 4 June 2007, points 19, 30, 55.
Prim. informacije, ki jih je predložila Poljska dne 4. junija 2007, točke 19, 30 in 55.
The total investment programme amounts to between PLN 150 million and PLN 220 million.
Skupni program naložb znaša med 150 milijoni PLN in 220 milijoni PLN.
In order to make the decision easier to follow, further confidential financial information is given as an approximate percentage of the amount of PLN 150-220 million (taking PLN 150-220 million as 100 %).
Da se ohrani berljivost te odločbe, so dodatne zaupne finančne informacije podane kot približen odstotek zneska v višini med 150 in 220 milijoni PLN (150–220 milijonov PLN pomeni 100 %).
2003 IBP, p. 66, Table 35.
Načrt IPN iz leta 2003, str. 66, tabela 35.
See ESC report for 2006 of July 2007.
Glej poročilo ESO za leto 2006 iz julija 2007.
Investments already implemented under the 2003 IBP.
Naložbe, ki so že bile izvedene na podlagi načrta IPN iz leta 2003
Protocol No 8 does not provide for this capacity reduction.
V Protokolu št. 8 zmanjšanje zmogljivosti ni predvideno.
Letter of 4 June 2007, point 20.
Dopis z dne 4. junija 2007, točka 20.
The Polish authorities confirm that the capital expenditure required for the adaptation relating to continuous casting and extending the product range is higher, but argue that it is compensated for by two factors: firstly, switching investment to the construction of a replacement mill should result in considerable cost savings of up to EUR 85 million and, secondly, there should be energy and operating cost savings later.
Poljski organi potrjujejo, da so investicijski izdatki, potrebni za prilagoditev v zvezi s kontinuiranim litjem in razširitvijo proizvodnega asortimenta, višji, vendar trdijo, da jih izravnata dva dejavnika: prvič, preusmeritev naložbe v izgradnjo nadomestne valjarne naj bi omogočila precejšnje prihranke stroškov do 85 milijonov EUR in, drugič, pozneje se bodo prihranili stroški energije in poslovanja.
See Decision of 5.7.2005 in Case C 20/04 Huta Czestochowa (OJ L 366, 21.12.2006, p. 1).
Glej Odločbo z dne 5.7.2005 v zadevi C 20/04 Huta Czestochowa, UL L 366, 21.12.2006, str. 1.
Letter 4 June 2007, point 24.
Dopis z dne 4. junija 2007, točka 24.
Misuse does not, however, call into question whether a beneficiary was originally entitled to receive aid, but only concludes that the aid has been used in contravention of the decision granting it.
Zaradi zlorabe se ne dvomi o tem, ali je bil prejemnik pomoči prvotno upravičen do prejema pomoči, temveč le sklepa, da je bila pomoč uporabljena v nasprotju z odločbo o njeni odobritvi.
This common principle has already been reiterated.
To skupno načelo se je že ponovilo.
It is laid down in point 45 of the rescue and restructuring guidelines and confirmed in Commission Decision in Case C 31/2001 Schmitz-Gotha, OJ L 77, 24.3.2003, p. 41, where the Commission rejected the acquisition of a subcontractor, which was seen as useful, but not as strictly necessary for the restructuring.
Določeno je v točki 45 smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje ter potrjeno v Odločbi Komisije v zadevi C31/2001 Schmitz-Gotha, UL L 77, 24.3.2003, str. 41, v kateri je Komisija zavrnila nakup podizvajalca, ki se je štel za koristnega, vendar ne nujno potrebnega za prestrukturiranje.
This was upheld in Case T-17/03 Schmitz-Gotha [2006] ECR II-1139.
To je bilo potrjeno v zadevi T-17/03 Schmitz–Gotha [2006] ZOdl. II-1139.
Commission Decision of 13.9.2006 in Case N 350a/2006 MSO, OJ C 280, 18.11.2006, p. 4, point 48.
Odločba Komisije z dne 13.9.2006 v zadevi N 350a/2006 MSO, UL C 280, 18.11.2006, str. 4, točka 48.
See Commission Decision of 23 October 2007 in Case C 23/06 Technologie Buczek, not yet published, where this was not the case.
Glej Odločbo Komisije z dne 23. oktobra 2007 v zadevi C 23/06 Technologie Buczek, še neobjavljena, kjer se to ni zgodilo.
Commission Notice on the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 273, 9.9.1997, p. 3).
Obvestilo Komisije o metodi določanja referenčnih/diskontnih mer, UL C 273, 9.9.1997, str. 3.
See also Commission Decision of 12.9.2007 to open proceedings in case NN 45/2007 (C 38/2007), Arbel Fauvet Rail, OJ C 249, 24.10.2007, p. 17, point 15.
Glej tudi Odločbo Komisije z dne 12. septembra 2007 o sprožitvi postopka v zadevi NN 45/2007 (C 38/2007), Arbel Fauvet Rail, UL C 249, 24.10.2007, str. 17, točka 15.
The Commission determines that a firm is in difficulty in accordance with the Community Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty, OJ C 244, 1.10.2004, p. 2.
Komisija opredeli, ali je podjetje v težavah, v skladu s smernicami Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah, UL C 244, 1.10.2004, str. 2.
Furthermore a firm is also regarded as being in difficulty when it is in its restructuring period and is following a restructuring plan, which is the case here.
Poleg tega se šteje, da je podjetje v težavah, kadar je v obdobju prestrukturiranja in sledi načrtu prestrukturiranja, kot v zadevnem primeru.
For the 400 basis points cf. Commission Decision of 2.3.2005 in Case C 43/2001, Chemische Werke Piesteritz, OJ L 296, 12.11.2005, p. 19, points 107-108; and Commission Decision of 24.1.2007 in Case C 38/2005, Biria, OJ L 183, 13.7.2007, p. 27, points 83 et seq.
Za 400 bazičnih točk prim. Odločbo Komisije z dne 2. marca 2005 v zadevi C 43/2001, Chemische Werke Piesteritz, UL L 296, 12.11.2005, str. 19, točki 107 in 108; ter Odločbo Komisije z dne 24. januarja 2007 v zadevi C 38/2005, Biria, UL L 183, 13.7.2007, str. 27, točka 83 in naslednje.
Commission Notice on the method for setting the reference and discount rates, OJ C 273, 9.9.1997, p. 3.
Obvestilo Komisije o metodi določanja referenčnih/diskontnih mer, UL C 273, 9.9.1997, str. 3.
Cf. Commission Notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees, OJ C 71, 11.3.2000, p. 14, point 3.2.
Prim. Obvestilo Komisije o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES za državne pomoči v obliki jamstev, UL C 71, 11.3.2000, str. 14, točka 3.2.
Commission Decision in Case N 186/05, Change of IBP of MSP, point 41 and Commission Decision No N 600/04 Change of IBP of VPFM.
Odločba Komisije v zadevi N 186/05, Sprememba IPN družbe MSP, točka 41, in Odločba Komisije št. N 600/04, Sprememba IPN družbe VPFM.
The Commission noted that the new investment would result in a reduction of capacity from 930 kt to 700 kt.
Komisija je opozorila, da bi imela nova naložba za posledico zmanjšanje proizvodne zmogljivosti z 930 kt na 700 kt.
In the interests of completeness, the Commission would also like to note that it maintains its view that the replacement was not already included in the 2003 IBP.
Zaradi popolnosti želi Komisija tudi opozoriti, da vztraja pri svojem stališču, da nadomestitev še ni bila vključena v načrt IPN iz leta 2003.
The IBP states clearly that HLW wanted ‘to focus on the gradual improvement of its product mix’ by ‘the development of production with a focus on speciality and engineering steels’.
V načrtu IPN je jasno navedeno, da se je hotela družba HLW „osredotočiti na postopno izboljšanje svoje ponudbe“ z „razvojem proizvodnje s poudarkom na specialnih in konstrukcijskih jeklih“.
However, it is evident that the company did not have the funds make do these investments before 2003, but could only do so with the help of Arcelor.
Vendar pa je očitno, da družba ni imela sredstev za izvedbo teh naložb pred letom 2003 in da je to lahko storila le s pomočjo družbe Arcelor.
The Polish authorities confirmed in a letter of 22 November 2007 that on 20 November AHW had paid 2007 EUR 2089768 into an account blocked in favour of the Polish Ministry of Finance.
Z dopisom z dne 22. novembra 2007 so poljski organi potrdili, da je 20. novembra 2007 družba AHW plačala 2089768 EUR na račun, zamrznjen za poljsko Ministrstvo za finance.
Under the conditions of the agreement, no one will have access to the money on the account until this Decision is adopted.
V skladu s pogoji iz sporazuma nima nihče dostopa do denarja na računu, dokler se ne sprejme ta odločba.
Liquid steel
Tekoče jeklo
Rolling mill merchant bars light-sections profiles
Valjarna – trgovske palice, lahki profili
Rolling mill long heavy-sections profiles
Valjarna – dolgi težki profili
Parts of this text have been hidden so as not to divulge confidential information.
Deli tega besedila so prikriti, da se ne razkrijejo zaupni podatki.
These have been indicated with a dotted line in square brackets.
Ti deli so označeni s pikčasto črto v oglatih oklepajih.
Figures correspond to Table 36 of the 2003 IBP.
Številke ustrezajo tabeli 36 v načrtu IPN iz leta 2003.
Figures updated in line with the Polish and independent Monitoring Reports of June 2007, taking EUR 1 to be PLN 3,95.
Številke so posodobljene v skladu s poljskimi in neodvisnimi poročili o spremljanju iz junija 2007, pri čemer se šteje, da 1 EUR znaša 3,95 PLN.
Buying back the productive assets was not therefore provided for in the 2003 IBP.
Odkup proizvodnih sredstev zato v načrtu IPN iz leta 2003 ni bil predviden.
Hence, HLW used the aid for a purpose which was not covered by the restructuring plan which was the basis for authorisation of the aid.
Družba HLW je uporabila pomoč za namen, ki ni bil zajet v načrtu prestrukturiranja, na podlagi katerega je bila pomoč odobrena.
However, between 30.9.2004 and 28.2.2005 only EUR 2854355 was utilised in eight instalments.
Med 30. septembrom 2004 in 28. februarjem 2005 se je porabilo samo 2854355 EUR v osmih obrokih.
The repayment took place on 16.9.2005.
Odplačilo je bilo opravljeno 16. septembra 2005;
Indeed, the 2003 IBP indicates in point 4.7 that only PLN 363 million was required to finance the restructuring.
V točki 4.7 načrta IPN iz leta 2003 je dejansko navedeno, da je bilo za financiranje prestrukturiranja potrebnih samo 363 milijonov PLN.
This is less then the total existing debt of PLN 513 million.
To je manj od skupnega sedanjega dolga v višini 513 milijonov PLN.
However, the use of the PLN 300 million is clarified in point 4.12.1 of the 2003 IBP concerning the costs and sources of the programme.
Vendar pa je uporaba 300 milijonov PLN pojasnjena v točki 4.12.1 načrta IPN iz leta 2003 v zvezi s stroški in viri programa.
This point explains that total financial coverage of PLN 219 million was required for 2002-03.
V tej točki je obrazloženo, da je bilo za obdobje 2002–2003 potrebno skupno finančno kritje v višini 219 milijonov PLN.
The purpose of this asset restructuring was to free up cash in order to make the investments.
Namen tega prestrukturiranja sredstev je bil sprostiti denarna sredstva za izvedbo naložb.
This would simultaneously reduce the financial cost of the debt.
To bi sočasno znižalo finančne stroške dolga.
Moreover, the Commission notes that the company still had some chances of getting finance and was able to provide decent security.
Poleg tega Komisija ugotavlja, da je imela družba še vedno nekaj možnosti za pridobitev finančnih sredstev in je bila spodobna zagotoviti ustrezno kritje.
This is confirmed in the guarantee contract, which required security.
To potrjuje pogodba o jamstvu, ki je kritje zahtevala.
The Restructuring Programme accepted that financial liquidity factors would gradually improve, starting from the year 2003.’ (f) Conclusion as to the restructuring efforts under the 2003 IBP
Sklepna ugotovitev v zvezi s prizadevanji za prestrukturiranje na podlagi načrta IPN iz leta 2003
[approx.
[pribl.
[Approx.
[pribl.
The asset restructuring must be seen against the background that HLW’s assets had already been the subject of a financial transaction described by HLW as a ‘sale and leaseback transaction’. In 2000 the company had obtained a PLN 250 million loan basically collateralised by a pledge on land and buildings belonging to the company.
V zvezi s prestrukturiranjem sredstev je treba upoštevati, da so bila sredstva družbe HLW že predmet finančne transakcije, ki jo je družba HLW opisala kot „transakcijo prodaje in povratnega najema.“ Leta 2000 je družba pridobila posojilo v višini 250 milijonov PLN, ki je bilo zavarovano predvsem z zastavitvijo zemljišč in zgradb v lasti družbe.
The 2005 IBP clearly indicates that ‘in order to meet market demand, it has become necessary to refine the strategy and to enrich the portfolio of the steel works by a new range of new products’. This implies that AHW wanted to meet the demand for construction steel by erecting a new mill capable of producing construction steel and using the existing liquid steel more efficiently for this purpose.
V načrtu IPN iz leta 2005 je jasno navedeno, da „je za zadostitev tržnega povpraševanja postalo nujno izpopolniti strategijo in obogatiti ponudbo jeklarn z novim asortimentom novih proizvodov.“ To pomeni, da je družba AHW hotela zadostiti povpraševanju po konstrukcijskem jeklu z izgradnjo nove valjarne, ki lahko proizvaja konstrukcijsko jeklo, in učinkovitejšo uporabo obstoječega tekočega jekla.
of 2 June 2008
z dne 2. junija 2008
(notified under document number C(2008) 2297)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 2297)
New Caledonia and Tanzania have submitted residue monitoring plans to the Commission for animals and products of animal origin not currently listed in the Annex to Decision 2004/432/EC.
Nova Kaledonija in Tanzanija sta Komisiji predložili programa nadzora nad ostanki za živali in proizvode živalskega izvora, ki v Prilogi k Odločbi 2004/432/ES trenutno niso navedeni.
The evaluation of those plans and the additional information obtained by the Commission provide sufficient guarantees on the residue monitoring in those third countries for the animals and products concerned.
Ocene navedenih programov in dodatne informacije, ki jih je pridobila Komisija, zadostujejo kot jamstva v zvezi z nadzorom nad ostanki za te živali in proizvode v navedenih tretjih državah.
The relevant animals and products of animal origin should therefore be included in the list for those third countries in the Annex to that Decision.
Zadevne živali in proizvode živalskega izvora je zato treba za navedeni tretji državi vključiti na seznam iz Priloge k navedeni odločbi.
Costa Rica, which is currently not listed in the Annex to Decision 2004/432/EC, has submitted a residue monitoring plan to the Commission concerning aquaculture products.
Kostarika, ki trenutno ni navedena v Prilogi k Odločbi 2004/432/ES, je Komisiji predložila program nadzora nad ostanki za proizvode iz ribogojstva.
The evaluation of that plan and the additional information obtained by the Commission provide sufficient guarantees on the residue monitoring for aquaculture products in that third country.
Ocene navedenih programov in dodatne informacije, ki jih je pridobila Komisija, zadostujejo kot jamstva v zvezi z nadzorom nad ostanki za proizvode iz ribogojstva v navedeni tretji državi.
Aquaculture products should therefore be included in the list for Costa Rica in the Annex to that Decision.
Proizvode iz ribogojstva je zato treba za Kostariko vključiti na seznam iz Priloge k navedeni odločbi.
Whereas that third country has demonstrated that the residue monitoring plan 2007/08 is being implemented for ostriches, it has again failed to provide evidence of the implementation of the plan for wild and farmed game, other than ostriches.
Čeprav je navedena tretja država dokazala, da izvaja program nadzora nad ostanki 2007/2008 za noje, ni predložila dokazov za izvajanje programa za prostoživečo in gojeno divjačino.
The entries for the relevant animals and products of animal origin should therefore be deleted from the list for South Africa in the Annex to that Decision.
Vnose za zadevne živali in proizvode živalskega izvora je zato treba za Južno Afriko črtati s seznama iz Priloge k navedeni odločbi.
A Food and Veterinary Office inspection to the Republic of Moldova has revealed serious deficiencies concerning the implementation of the residue monitoring plan for honey.
Inšpekcijski pregled Urada za prehrano in veterinarstvo v Republiki Moldaviji je pokazal resne pomanjkljivosti glede izvajanja programa nadzora nad ostanki za med.
The relevant entry for the Republic of Moldova should therefore be deleted from the list in the annex to that Decision.
Zadevni vnos za Republiko Moldavijo je zato treba črtati s seznama iz Priloge k navedeni odločbi.
A transitional period should be laid down to cover consignments of animals and products of animal origin originating in South Africa and the Republic of Moldova which were dispatched from those third countries for the Community before the date of application of this Decision, to cover the time needed for their arrival in the Community and avoid any disruption to trade.
Določiti je treba prehodno obdobje za pošiljke živali in proizvodov živalskega izvora s poreklom iz Južne Afrike in Republike Moldavije, ki so bile odpremljene iz navedenih tretjih držav v Skupnost pred datumom začetka uporabe te odločbe, tako da se upošteva čas, potreben za njihov prihod v Skupnost, in prepreči motnje v trgovini.
The amendments to the list in the Annex to Decision 2004/432/EC by the present Decision shall not apply to consignments of animals and products of animal origin from South Africa and the Republic of Moldova where the importer of such animals and products can demonstrate that they had been dispatched respectively from South Africa and the Republic of Moldova and were en route to the Community before the date of application of the present Decision.
Spremembe seznama v Prilogi k Odločbi 2004/432/ES iz te odločbe ne veljajo za pošiljke živali in proizvodov živalskega izvora iz Južne Afrike in Republike Moldavije, če uvoznik takšnih proizvodov živali in lahko dokaže, da so bili odpremljeni iz Južne Afrike in Republike Moldavije ter da so bili na poti v Skupnost pred datumom začetka uporabe te odločbe.
Done at Brussels, 2 June 2008.
V Bruslju, 2. junija 2008
Decision as last amended by Decision 2008/222/EC (OJ L 70, 14.3.2008, p. 17).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2008/222/ES (UL L 70, 14.3.2008, str. 17).
OJ L 38, 13.2.2008, p. 9.
UL L 38, 13.2.2008, str. 9.
Equine
Sektor vzreje konj
Only ostriches.’
Samo noji.“
South Africa was deleted with regards to several animals and products of animal origin from the Annex of Decision 2004/432/EC, as amended by Commission Decision 2008/105/EC [3].
Južna Afrika je bila v zvezi s številnimi živalmi in proizvodi živalskega izvora črtana s Priloge k Odločbi 2004/432/ES, ki je bila spremenjena z Odločbo Komisije 2008/105/ES [3].
However, after providing substantial guarantees, South Africa maintained its entries concerning wild and farmed game, including ostriches.
Vendar je Južna Afrika po predložitvi bistvenih jamstev ohranila vnose za prostoživečo in gojeno divjad, vključno z noji.
on the State aid C 36/A/06 (ex NN 38/06) implemented by Italy in favour of ThyssenKrupp, Cementir and Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche
o državni pomoči C 36/A/06 (ex NN 38/06) Italije za ThyssenKrupp, Cementir in Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche
(notified under document number C(2007) 5400)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 5400)
In framework of case C 13/06 (ex N 587/05) — Preferential Electricity Tariff in Sardinia, the Commission became aware of the extension of two measures granting a preferential electricity tariff.
V zadevi, ki je evidentirana pod številko C 13/2006 (ex N 587/05) – Ugodnejše cene električne energije na Sardiniji, je bila Komisija seznanjena s podaljšanjem dveh ukrepov o odobritvi ugodnejših cen električne energije.
The extension was granted by virtue of Article 11, paragraph 11 of decreto-legge No 35/2005, converted into Law 80 of 14 May 2005 (hereinafter Law 80/2005) and was implemented without prior notification to the Commission.
Podaljšanje je bilo odobreno na podlagi odstavka 11 člena 11 zakonskega odloka (decreto-legge) št. 35/2005, ki je bil spremenjen v zakon št. 80 z dne 14. maja 2005 (v nadaljnjem besedilu „zakon št. 80/2005“) in je bilo izvedeno, ne da bi se prej o njem uradno obvestilo Komisijo.