natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Health Advisor in the Office of the President, born 15.10.1936
svetovalec za zdravstvene zadeve v uradu predsednika, rojen 15.10.1936
ZANU (PF) Politburo Deputy Secretary for Finance, born 15.6.1940
namestnik sekretarja za finance v politbiroju ZANU (PF), rojen 15.6.1940
Minister of State for State Enterprises (Former Deputy Minister of Economic Development)
državni sekretar za državna podjetja (nekdanji namestnik ministra za gospodarski razvoj)
Chairman of the Presidential Land Review Committee (former Cabinet Secretary), born 30.10.1938
vodja predsedniškega odbora za preverjanje zemljiške posesti (nekdanji vodja kabineta), rojen 30.10.1938
Senior Assistant Police Commissioner, Officer Commanding Harare
visoki pomočnik policijskega komisarja, načelnik Harareja
Prisons Director, born 4.3.1947
direktor zaporov, rojen 4.3.1947
Deputy Minister for Science and Technology (NB Mugabe's nephew)
namestnik ministra za znanost in tehnologijo (opomba: Mugabejev nečak)
Politburo, Indigenisation and Empowerment Committee in the party, born 27.9.1943
politbiro, odbor stranke za podpiranje domorodnega prebivalstva, rojen 27.9.1943
Former Minister of Finance and Economic Development, born 4.4.1949. NB currently on remand
nekdanji minister za finance in gospodarski razvoj, rojen 4.4.1949; opomba: trenutno v preiskovalnem zaporu
(Case COMP/C.38.238/B.2) — Raw tobacco — Spain
(Zadeva COMP/C.38.238/B.2) – Raw tobacco – Spain
(notified under document number C(2004) 4030)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2004) 4030)
(Only the Spanish, English and Italian texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v španskem, angleškem in italijanskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
On 20 October 2004, the Commission adopted a Decision relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty.
Komisija je 20. oktobra 2004 sprejela odločbo v zvezi s postopkom iz člena 81 Pogodbe ES.
In accordance with the provisions of Article 30 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 [1], the Commission herewith publishes the names of the parties and the main content of the Decision, including any penalties imposed, having regard to the legitimate interest of undertakings in the protection of their business secrets.
V skladu z določbami člena 30 Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003 [1] Komisija objavlja imena strank in glavno vsebino odločbe, vključno z naloženimi kaznimi, ob upoštevanju pravnega interesa podjetij glede varovanja njihovih poslovnih skrivnosti.
A non-confidential version of the full text of the decision can be found in the authentic languages of the case and in the Commission's working languages at DG COMP website at http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/index_en.htmlSUMMARY OF THE DECISION
Različica celotnega besedila odločbe, ki ni zaupna, je na voljo v izvirnih jezikih zadeve in delovnih jezikih Komisije na spletni strani GD COMP http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/index_en.htmlPOVZETEK ODLOČBE
INTRODUCTION
UVOD Odločba obravnava dve vzporedni kršitvi, kršitev predelovalcev in kršitev predstavnikov proizvajalcev surovega tobaka v Španiji.
The decision deals with two horizontal infringements, one by processors and the other by representatives of producers of raw tobacco in Spain.
Kršitev predelovalcev zadeva sporazume in/ali usklajena ravnanja med štirimi podjetji, ki sodelujejo pri prvi predelavi surovega tobaka v Španiji, namreč Compañía española de tabaco en rama, S.A. („Cetarsa“), Agroexpansión S.A. („Agroexpansión“), World Wide Tobacco España („WWTE“) in Tabacos españoles S.L.
The processors’ infringement concerns agreements and/or concerted practices between the four undertakings engaged in the first processing of raw tobacco in Spain, namely Compañía española de tabaco en rama, SA (Cetarsa), Agroexpansión SA (Agroexpansión), World Wide Tobacco España (WWTE) and Tabacos españoles SL (Taes) (hereinafter referred to collectively as the processors) and Deltafina SpA (Deltafina, an Italian processor), either directly or, from 1999 onwards, through the association ANETAB.
(„Taes“) (v nadaljnjem besedilu skupno imenovani „predelovalci“) ter Deltafina SpA („Deltafina“, italijanski predelovalec), bodisi neposredno ali od leta 1999 dalje preko združenja ANETAB.
The object of this secret cartel was to fix each year, between 1996 and 2001, the (maximum) average delivery price for each variety of raw tobacco and to share out the quantities of each variety of raw tobacco that were to be bought.
Naloga tega tajnega kartela je bila, med letoma 1996 in 2001, vsako leto določiti (najvišjo) povprečno dobavno ceno za vsako sorto surovega tobaka in razdeliti količine vsake sorte surovega tobaka, ki bi bile kupljene.
During the last three years, the processors also agreed among themselves the price brackets per quality grade of each raw tobacco variety that are given in the schedules annexed to the ‘cultivation contracts’ and the additional conditions applicable (i.e. the average minimum price per producer and per producer group).
V zadnjih treh letih so se predelovalci med seboj dogovorili tudi o cenovnih razredih na stopnjo kakovosti vsake sorte surovega tobaka, navedenih v načrtih, priloženih k „pogodbam o pridelovanju“ in o dodatnih pogojih, ki se uporabljajo (tj. povprečni najnižji ceni na proizvajalca in na skupino proizvajalcev).
The producers’ infringement concerns agreements and/or concerted practices between the three agricultural unions in Spain [2]: ASAJA, UPA and COAG and the Confederation of Agricultural Cooperatives CCAE [3] (hereinafter referred to collectively as the producer representatives).
Kršitev proizvajalcev zadeva sporazume in/ali usklajena ravnanja med tremi kmetijskimi sindikati v Španiji [2]: ASAJA, UPA in COAG ter Konfederacija kmetijskih zadrug CCAE [3] (v nadaljnjem besedilu skupno imenovani „predstavniki proizvajalca“).
The object of this cartel was to fix each year, between at least 1996 and 2001, the price brackets per quality grade of each raw tobacco variety that are given in the schedules annexed to the ‘cultivation contracts’ and the additional conditions applicable.
Naloga tega kartela je bila, vsaj med leti 1996 in 2001, določiti cenovne razrede na stopnjo kakovosti vsake sorte surovega tobaka, navedenih v načrtih, priloženih k „pogodbam o pridelovanju“ in o dodatnih pogojih, ki se uporabljajo.
ORIGIN OF THE CASE AND PROCEDURE
IZVOR ZADEVE IN POSTOPEK
The Commission started this ex officio procedure with inspections at the premises of several Spanish processors and other market participants between 3 and 5 October 2001.
Komisija je ta postopek po uradni dolžnosti začela s pregledi v prostorih številnih španskih predelovalcev in drugih udeležencev na trgu med 3. in 5. oktobrom 2001.
By letter of 16 January 2002, the four Spanish processors and their association ANETAB announced that they were committed to cooperating with the Commission in the proceedings under the terms of the 1996 leniency notice and supplied various memoranda giving evidence on the facts at issue.
Štirje španski predelovalci in njihovo združenje ANETAB so s pismom z dne 16. januarja 2002 sporočili, da so pri postopkih odločeni sodelovati s Komisijo, v skladu s pogoji Uredbe o kronskih pričah iz leta 1996 in predložili različne memorandume z dokazi o spornih dejstvih.
They also informed the Commission that, as of 3 October 2001, they had put an end to their practices.
Komisijo so tudi obvestili, da so s 3. oktobrom 2001 končali svoje ravnanje.
During the procedure, several requests were addressed to the parties concerned, including one to the Spanish Ministry for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (the Agriculture Ministry) regarding the Spanish rules governing agricultural products.
Med postopkom so bile na zadevne stranke naslovljene številne prošnje, vključno s prošnjo, naslovljeno na špansko ministrstvo za kmetijstvo, ribištvo in hrano („Kmetijsko ministrstvo“) v zvezi s španskimi pravili za kmetijske proizvode.
On 11 December 2003, the Commission initiated proceedings in this case and adopted a Statement of Objections (hereinafter SO) to which the addressees were given the opportunity to reply in writing and at the oral hearing which was held on 29 March 2004.
Komisija je 11. decembra 2003 začela s postopki za to zadevo in sprejela obvestilo o nasprotovanju (v nadaljnjem besedilu „ON“), za katerega so imeli naslovniki možnost, da nanj odgovorijo v pisni obliki in na ustnem zaslišanju, ki je potekalo 29. marca 2004.
PARTIES
STRANKE
The decision is addressed to the four Spanish processors (Cetarsa, Agroexpansión, WWTE and Taes) and Deltafina as well as to the parent companies of some of these companies.
Odločba je naslovljena na štiri španske predelovalce (Cetarsa, Agroexpansión, WWTE in Taes) in Deltafino, pa tudi na matična podjetja nekaterih teh družb.
Cetarsa is a public undertaking that held until 1990 a legal monopoly in the processing of raw tobacco in Spain.
Cetarsa je javno podjetje, ki je imelo do leta 1990 pravni monopol nad predelavo surovega tobaka v Španiji.
It is still the largest Spanish processor, having bought in 2001 some 67,6 % of the raw tobacco bought in Spain that year.
Še vedno je največji španski predelovalec, saj je leta 2001 kupil okoli 67,6 % surovega tobaka, kupljenega v Španiji tisto leto.
Agroexpansión was set up in 1988 by its chairman as a family-run enterprise.
Agroexpansión je leta 1988 kot družinsko vodeno podjetje ustanovil njegov predsednik.
In the first half of 1997 the firm Intabex Netherlands BV (Intabex), a wholly owned subsidiary of Dimon Inc., (Dimon), acquired all the capital.
V prvi polovici leta 1997 je podjetje Intabex Netherlands BV („Intabex“), hčerinsko podjetje v popolni lasti Dimon Inc. („Dimon“), pridobilo ves kapital.
In 2001 Agroexpansión bought around 15 % of the raw tobacco bought in Spain that year.
Leta 2001 je podjetje Agroexpansión kupilo okoli 15 % surovega tobaka, kupljenega v Španiji tisto leto.
Since May 1998 WWTE has been some 90 %-controlled by the US multinational Standard Commercial Corporation (SCC) through two wholly owned subsidiaries: Standard Commercial Tobacco Co., Inc., (SCTC) and Trans-Continental Leaf Tobacco Corporation (TCLT).
Od maja 1998 dalje, je okoli 90 % WWTE nadzirala ameriška večnacionalna družba Standard Commercial Corporation („SCC“) preko dveh hčerinskih podjetij v popolni lasti: Standard Commercial Tobacco Co. Inc. („SCTC“) in Trans-Continental Leaf Tobacco Corporation („TCLT“).
From 1995 to May 1998, SCC, through TCLT, held two thirds of WWTE's capital.
SCC je od leta 1995 do maja 1998 preko TCLT imelo v lasti dve tretjini kapitala WWTE.
In 2001 WWTE bought around 15,7 % of the raw tobacco bought in Spain that year.
Leta 2001 je WWTE kupilo okoli 15,7 % surovega tobaka, kupljenega v Španiji tisto leto.
Taes is a subsidiary of the Universal Corporation Group.
Taes je hčerinsko podjetje Universal Corporation Group.
Until December 2002 Universal Leaf Tobacco Company Inc., (Universal Leaf), a wholly owned subsidiary of Universal Corporation, held 90 % of Tae’s shares.
Do decembra 2002 je Universal Leaf Tobacco Company Inc. („Universal Leaf“), hčerinsko podjetje v popolni lasti, imelo v lasti 90 % Taesovih delnic.
Since December 2002, Taes is a wholly owned subsidiary of Universal Leaf.
Od decembra 2002 je Taes hčerinsko podjetje v popolni lasti Universal Leafa.
In 2001 Taes bought around 1,6 % of the raw tobacco bought in Spain that year.
Leta 2001 je podjetje Taes kupilo okoli 1,6 % surovega tobaka, kupljenega v Španiji tisto leto.
Deltafina is the wholly owned subsidiary of Universal Corporation in Italy and hence the sister company of Taes.
Deltafina je hčerinsko podjetje v popolni lasti Universal Corporation v Italiji in je tako sestrinska družba Taesa.
It is responsible for the activities of the Universal group in Europe.
Odgovorna je za dejavnosti skupine Universal v Evropi.
It purchases most of the tobacco bought by Taes in Spain as well as a significant part of two other Spanish processors’ tobacco.
Odkupuje večino tobaka, ki ga je kupil Taes v Španiji, in tudi pomemben delež dveh drugih španskih predelovalcev tobaka.
WWTE’s and Agroexpanión’s parent companies are also addressees for being jointly and severally liable of the behaviour of the subsidiaries.
Naslovljenke so tudi matične družbe WWTE-ja in Agroexpanióna, saj so solidarno odgovorne za vedenje hčerinskih družb.
Following the hearing of the parties, the Commission decided to close the proceedings against Universal Corporation, Universal Leaf, Intabex and ANETAB.
Po zaslišanju strank se je Komisija odločila, da zaključi postopke proti Universal Corporation, Universal Leaf, Intabex in ANETAB.
For Universal Corporation, Universal Leaf and Intabex, the Commission considered that it had not sufficient evidence of their exercising decisive influence on Deltafina and Taes (as far as Universal Corporation and Universal Leaf are concerned) and Agroexpansión (as far as Intabex is concerned).
V zvezi z Universal Corporation, Universal Leaf in Intabex je Komisija menila, da nima zadostnih dokazov o izvajanju odločujočega vpliva na Deltafino in Taesa (kar zadeva Universal Corporation in Universal Leaf) ter na Agroexpansión (kar zadeva Intabex).
Liability is nonetheless found in respect of Dimon, Agroexpansión’s ultimate parent.
Vseeno je bila ugotovljena odgovornost v zvezi z Dimonom, končnim matičnim podjetjem Agroexpansióna.
For ANETAB, the Commission considered that it did not have sufficient evidence that ANETAB’s behaviour was distinct from the behaviour of its four member companies.
Glede ANETAB-a je Komisija menila, da nima zadostnih dokazov o tem, da bi se vedenje ANETAB-a razlikovalo od vedenja njegovih štirih družb članic.
The decision is also addressed to three agricultural union organisations (ASAJA, UPA, and COAG) and the confederation of agricultural cooperatives, CCAE, all representing tobacco producers.
Odločba je bila naslovljena tudi na tri organizacije kmetijskih sindikatov (ASAJA, UPA in COAG) ter na konfederacijo kmetijskih zadrug CCAE, vse predstavljajo proizvajalce tobaka.
Following the hearing of the parties, the Commission decided to close the proceedings against FNCT, ACOTAB and TABARES, having concluded that they acted as sectoral branches of ASAJA (as far as FNCT is concerned) and UPA (as far as ACOTAB and TABARES are concerned).
Po zaslišanju strank se je Komisija odločila, da zaključi postopke proti FNCT-ju, ACOTAB-u in TABARES-u, saj je sklenila, da so delovali kot sektorske podružnice ASAJE (kar zadeva FNCT) in UPE (kar zadeva ACOTAB in TABARES).
THE SECTOR CONCERNED: SPANISH RAW TOBACCO
ZADEVNI SEKTOR: ŠPANSKI SUROVI TOBAK
The production of raw tobacco in the EU represents approximately 5 % of raw tobacco production worldwide.
Pridelava surovega tobaka v EU predstavlja približno 5 % pridelave surovega tobaka po svetu.
Greece, Italy and Spain are the leading Member States in terms of tobacco produced, covering 38 %, 37,5 % and 12 % of the production in the EU respectively.
Grčija, Italija in Španija so vodilne države članice glede pridelanega tobaka, saj pokrivajo 38 %, 37,5 % in 12 % pridelave v EU, v tem zaporedju.
Production of raw tobacco in the EU is subject to a quota system (see below).
Za pridelavo surovega tobaka v EU se uporablja sistem kvot (glej spodaj).
Raw tobacco, as produced by growers, is not a homogeneous product.
Surovi tobak, ki ga pridelujejo proizvajalci, ni homogeni proizvod.
Community law recognises eight different varieties.
Zakonodaja Skupnosti priznava osem različnih sort.
In Spain, Bright is the most common variety.
V Španiji je najobičajnejša sorta Bright.
Within each category, different quality grades can be distinguished.
Znotraj vsake kategorije je mogoče ločiti različne stopnje kakovosti.
Determination of the grades is left to the industry and, ultimately, to private negotiation.
Določitev stopenj je prepuščena gospodarski panogi in, končno, zasebnim pogajanjem.
After drying, producers sell the tobacco to processors in batches whose price differs depending on the quality of the tobacco they contain.
Po sušenju proizvajalci tobak prodajo predelovalcem v serijah, katerih cene se razlikujejo glede na kakovost tobaka, ki ga vsebujejo.
THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
REGULATIVNI OKVIR
Both the production of raw tobacco and its sale to processors are subject to regulation under Community and national law.
Tako za pridelavo surovega tobaka kot tudi za njegovo prodajo predelovalcem se uporabljajo predpisi iz zakonodaje Skupnosti in nacionalne zakonodaje.
The common organisation of the market in raw tobacco (CMO for raw tobacco) was established in 1970 by Council Regulation (EEC) No 727/70 [4].
Skupna ureditev trga za surovi tobak („skupna ureditev trga za surovi tobak“) je bila vzpostavljena leta 1970 z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 727/70 [4].
It was replaced in 1992 by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 [5] and substantially amended in 1998 by Council Regulation (EC) No 1636/98 [6] and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 [7].The CMO in the raw tobacco sector provides for (i) a production quota system and (ii) support of producers’ income through a premium system for the production of raw tobacco.
Leta 1992 jo je nadomestila Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2075/92 [5], ki je bila bistveno spremenjena leta 1998 z Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1636/98 [6] in Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 2848/98 [7].Skupna ureditev trga za sektor surovega tobaka predvideva (i) sistem proizvodnih kvot in (ii) podpiranje dohodkov proizvajalcev s sistemom premij za pridelavo surovega tobaka.
Premium is only granted in respect of tobacco produced within the quota (with certain adjustments).
Premija se odobri le glede tobaka, pridelanega v okviru kvote (z nekaterimi prilagoditvami).
Since 1998, the payment of part of the Community premium (so-called variable part) has been linked to the quality of the tobacco produced which is reflected in the price.
Od leta 1998 je plačilo dela premije Skupnosti (tako imenovani variabilni del) povezano s kakovostjo pridelanega tobaka, ki se odraža v ceni.
The payment of the variable part of the premium is entrusted to the producers’ groups.
Za plačilo variabilnega dela premije so zadolžene skupine proizvajalcev.
The CMO requires each producer or producers’ group and each first processor to enter into so-called ‘cultivation contracts’ at the start of each year’s campaign (around March-May, when tobacco seedlings are transplanted) where they agree on ‘contract prices’ for each quality grade for each individual variety.
Skupna ureditev trga od vsakega proizvajalca ali skupine proizvajalcev in vsakega prvega predelovalca zahteva sklenitev tako imenovanih „pogodb o pridelovanju“ na začetku vsakoletne kampanje (okoli meseca marca in maja, ko so sadike tobaka presajene), s katerimi se dogovorijo o „pogodbenih cenah“ za vsako stopnjo kakovosti za vsako posamezno sorto.
At this stage, prices are often expressed as a price range.
Na tej stopnji so cene pogosto izražene v obliki cenovnega razpona.
In Spain, contract prices are in fact expressed as a series of price brackets for the various quality grades of a particular tobacco variety (e.g. Bright).
V Španiji so pogodbene cene dejansko izražene kot vrsta cenovnih razredov za različne stopnje kakovosti posamezne sorte tobaka (npr. Bright).
The price brackets featuring in the cultivation contracts are quite wide.
Cenovni razredi, prikazani v pogodbah o pridelovanju, so precej široki.
To note, however, that the final price (or delivery price) can only be determined when the harvest takes place (i.e. between October and January) and can vary significantly from the cultivation contract price, depending on quality, quantities and further bargaining.
Vendar je treba upoštevati, da se lahko dokončna cena (ali „dobavna cena“) določi šele ob žetvi (tj. med oktobrom in januarjem) in se lahko bistveno razlikuje od „cen iz pogodbe o pridelovanju“, odvisno od kakovosti, količine in nadaljnjih pogajanj.
Community law favours the creation of inter-branch organisations within which producers and processors should cooperate for the efficient operation of the market.
Zakonodaja Skupnosti podpira ustanovitev medpanožnih organizacij, znotraj katerih proizvajalci in predelovalci sodelujejo za učinkovito delovanje trga.
Practices consisting of the fixing of prices and quotas are expressly forbidden.
Ravnanje, ki ga sestavlja določanje cen in kvot je izrecno prepovedano.
None of the associations involved in this case are inter-branch organisations within the meaning of Community law.
Nobeno od združenj, vpletenih v to zadevo, ni medpanožna organizacija v smislu zakonodaje Skupnosti.
In Spain, a 1982 Law and a Royal Decree of 1985 discipline the bargaining and the conclusion of standard cultivation contracts between producers’ representatives and processors.
V Španiji pogajanja in sklenitev standardnih pogodb o pridelovanju med predstavniki proizvajalcev in predelovalci urejata zakon iz leta 1982 in Kraljeva uredba iz leta 1985.
The purpose of this overall regulatory framework (to include the action taken by the Agriculture Ministry thereafter) was (until the year 2000) to at least encourage joint negotiations between producers and processors on the cultivation ‘contract prices’.
Namen tega skupnega regulativnega okvira (poleg ukrepov, ki jih je zatem sprejelo Kmetijsko ministrstvo) je bil vsaj (do leta 2000) spodbuditi skupna pogajanja med proizvajalci in predelovalci o „pogodbenih cenah“ pridelave.
Since 2000, a new law requires that the parties to cultivation contracts must individually agree the contract prices.
Od leta 2000 nov zakon zahteva, da se stranke pogodb o pridelovanju individualno dogovorijo o pogodbenih cenah.
PRACTICES ADDRESSED IN THE DECISION
RAVNANJA, PREDVIDENA V ODLOČBI
The processors’ cartel
Kartel predelovalcev
The four Spanish processors and Deltafina agreed on the (maximum) average price they would pay at delivery for each variety of tobacco, irrespective of quality grades ((maximum) average delivery price) and the quantities of tobacco that each of them could buy.
Štirje španski predelovalci in Deltafina so se dogovorili o (najvišji) povprečni ceni, ki bi jo plačali ob dobavi za vsako sorto tobaka, ne glede na stopnjo kakovosti („(najvišja) povprečna dobavna cena“) in o količinah tobaka, ki bi jih lahko vsak od njih kupil.
By so doing the processors aimed at avoiding that negotiation with producers at delivery could push prices beyond the level they would consider acceptable.
S tem so predelovalci želeli preprečiti, da bi pogajanje s proizvajalci ob dobavi cene dvignilo čez stopnjo, ki je zanje sprejemljiva.
The period covered by the decision is 1996-2001.
Obdobje, zajeto z odločbo, je od leta 1996 do 2001.
Since 1998, they also put in place a sophisticated monitoring and enforcement mechanism (including regular exchanges of information and mandatory transfers of tobacco) concerning their respective behaviour during delivery.
Od leta 1998 so tudi vzpostavili visoko razvit mehanizem spremljanja in izvrševanja (vključno z rednimi izmenjavami informacij in obveznimi prenosi tobaka) glede njihovega vedenja med dobavo.
As from 1999 to 2001, processors also agreed among themselves the ‘contract prices’ (price brackets and additional conditions) which they would then propose to producer representatives during the negotiation of the annual standard cultivation contract.
Od leta 1999 do 2001 so se predelovalci med seboj dogovarjali tudi o „pogodbenih cenah“ (cenovni razredi in dodatni pogoji), katere so nato predlagali predstavnikom proizvajalcev med pogajanjem za letno standardno pogodbo o pridelovanju.
The producers’ cartel
Kartel proizvajalcev
The producer representatives agreed on the ‘contract prices’ (price brackets and additional conditions) which they would then propose to processors during the negotiation of the standard cultivation contract.
Predstavniki proizvajalcev so se dogovorili o „pogodbenih cenah“ (cenovni razredi in dodatni pogoji), katere so nato predlagali predelovalcem med pogajanjem za standardno pogodbo o pridelovanju.
As to the additional price conditions, they take the form of minimum average prices per producer as well as per producers group for each variety of tobacco, irrespective of the various quality grades.
Dodatni cenovni pogoji so v obliki najnižjih povprečnih cen na proizvajalca, pa tudi na skupine proizvajalcev za vsako sorto tobaka, ne glede na različne stopnje kakovosti.