natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Net investments (EUR 1000)
Neto naložbe VP (v 1000 EUR)
Profitability of the sampled producers shows a significant improvement from 2002 to the RIP, when it reached the level of 16,9 %.
Dobičkonosnost vzorčenih proizvajalcev kaže na znatno izboljšanje zlasti med letom 2002 do OPP, ko je dosegla stopnjo 16,9 %.
In this respect, it is noted that in the original investigation, a profit margin of 5 % that may be reached in the absence of injurious dumping was established.
Ob upoštevanju tega je treba opozoriti, da je bila v prvotni preiskavi določena 5-odstotna stopnja dobička, ki se lahko doseže brez škodljivega dampinga.
The return on investments (ROI), expressed as the profit in percent of the net book value of investments, broadly followed the profitability trend.
Donosnost posamezne naložbe (ROI), izražena kot dobiček v odstotkih neto knjigovodske vrednosti naložb, je na splošno sledila trendu dobičkonosnosti.
It increased over threefold during the period considered.
V obravnavanem obdobju se je več kot potrojila.
profitability of EC sales to unrelated customers (% of net sales)
Dobičkonosnost prodaje VP v ES nepovezanim strankam (% neto prodaje)
ROI (profit in % of net book value of investment)
Donosnost naložb ROI VP (dobiček v % neto knjigovodske vrednosti naložb)
Cash-flow increased more than threefold during the period considered.
Denarni tok se je v obravnavanem obdobju več kot potrojil.
This development is in line with the development of the overall profitability and the ROI during the period considered.
Ta razvoj je v skladu z razvojem celotne dobičkonosnosti in ROI med obravnavanem obdobju.
cash flow (EUR 1000)
Denarni tok VP (v 1000 EUR)
Between 2002 and the RIP, the market share of the Community industry decreased slightly, as did its sales volume on the Community market.
Tržni delež industrije Skupnosti in prodaja na trgu Skupnosti sta se med 2002 in OPP nekoliko zmanjšala.
However, the overall financial situation of the Community industry has overwhelmingly improved during the period considered, as compared to the period preceding the previous expiry review that in 2001 resulted in maintenance of the existing measures, which have been in force since 1995.
Vendar se je v obravnavanem obdobju splošno finančno stanje industrije Skupnosti v primerjavi z obdobjem pred pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa, ki je leta 2001 privedlo do ohranitve obstoječih ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo od leta 1995, zelo izboljšalo.
During the period considered, profitability of the sampled producers increased considerably, exceeding significantly, in each year of the period considered, the level of profitability set as a target profit in the original investigation.
Dobičkonosnost vzorčenih proizvajalcev se je v obravnavanem obdobju znatno povečala in v vsakem letu obravnavanega obdobja znatno presegla stopnjo dobičkonosnosti, določeno v prvotni preiskavi kot ciljno.
Also return on investment and cash-flow increased many times.
Prav tako so sta večkratno povečala donos naložb in denarni tok.
Production volume of the Community industry remained stable.
Obseg proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti je ostal stabilen.
Sales prices of the sampled producers evolved positively over the whole period considered.
Prodajne cene vzorčenih proizvajalcev so se v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju pozitivno razvijale.
It should be noted that the overwhelmingly positive development of the profitability of the Community industry took place in a context of the Russian export prices to the Community being significantly above the MIP albeit dumped.
Treba je opozoriti, da se je do zelo pozitivnega razvoja dobičkonosnosti industrije Skupnosti prišlo v okviru povečanja ruskih izvoznih cen v Skupnost, ki so bile znatno nad stopnjo MIP, čeprav so te cene ostale dampinške.
Therefore, throughout the period considered, the Russian export prices have not affected the Community industry.
Zato ruske izvozne cene v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju niso vplivale na industrijo Skupnosti.
The applicant has, after receiving the disclosure of the findings of the Commission, claimed that the long term profitability requirements, measured as a return on sales, for the urea industry should be at the level of 25 % after tax.
Vložnik je po prejetju razkritij ugotovitev Komisije trdil, da bi bilo treba dolgoročne zahteve glede dobičkonosnosti, izražene kot donosnost prodaje, za industrijo sečnine določiti v višini 25 % po plačilu dajatve.
This would translate to around 36 % pre-tax profit on turnover.
To bi pomenilo približno 36-odstotni dobiček od prometa pred obdavčitvijo.
The applicant claimed that this is justified by the cost of establishing a new ammonia/urea complex, which would require a return on investment of 11 % (allegedly equivalent to the 36 % pre-tax profit on turnover).
Vložnik je trdil, da to upravičuje strošek vzpostavitve novega kompleksa amoniaka/sečnine, za kar bi bila potrebna 11-odstotna donosnost naložb (ki domnevno ustreza 36-odstotnemu dobički od prometa).
In this regard, it is noted that the applicant has never claimed such a high target profit in the framework of this proceeding, and in the original investigation a profit margin of 5 % that may be reached in the absence of injurious dumping was established.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da vložnik v tej preiskavi nikoli ni zahteval tako visokega ciljnega dobička in da je bila v prvotni preiskavi določena 5-odstotna stopnja dobička, ki je lahko dosežena brez škodljivega dampinga.
Furthermore, the Court of First Instance has in its judgement in Case T-210/95 confirmed that ‘… the profit margin to be used by the Council when calculating the target price that will remove the injury in question must be limited to the profit margin which the Community industry could reasonably count on under normal conditions of competition, in the absence of the dumped imports.’
Sodišče prve stopnje je v sodbi v Zadevi T-210/95 potrdilo, da „mora biti stopnja dobička, ki jo mora uporabiti Svet pri izračunu ciljne cene za odpravo zadevne škode, omejena na stopnjo dobička, ki bi jo lahko dosegla industrija Skupnosti pod normalnimi konkurenčnimi pogoji, če ne bi bilo dampinškega uvoza“ [9].
In the same case, it was confirmed that ‘… [an] argument that the profit margin which is to be used by the Community institutions must be the margin necessary to ensure the survival of the Community industry and/or an adequate return on capital, has no basis whatever in the basic regulation [10].’
V isti zadevi je bilo potrjeno, da „… trditev, da mora biti stopnja dobička, ki jo morajo uporabiti institucije Skupnosti, enaka stopnji, potrebni za zagotovitev preživetja industrije Skupnosti, in/ali stopnji, ki ustreza donosnosti kapitala, vsekakor ni v skladu z osnovno uredbo“.
Indeed, in the present case the applicant has not submitted any evidence that, in the absence of the dumped imports, the Community industry would have been able to achieve returns at the level requested.
V tem premeru vložnik ni predložil dokaza, da bi bila industrija Skupnosti zmožna doseči donosnost na zahtevanih ravneh, če ne bi bilo dampinškega uvoza.
Neither did the applicant show what profit margin the Community industry would have been able to achieve but for the dumped imports.
Tako ni dokazal, katero stopnjo dobička bi lahko industrija Skupnosti dosegla brez dampinškega uvoza.
This claim was therefore rejected.
Trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
In the light of the foregoing, it is concluded that there was no continuation of material injury to the Community industry.
Glede na navedeno se sklene, da industriji Skupnosti ni bila povzročena nadaljnja znatna škoda.
Since there is no continuation of material injury caused by imports from the country concerned, the analysis focused on the likelihood of recurrence of material injury should the existing measures be removed.
Ker uvoz iz zadevne države ni povzročil nadaljnje znatne škode, se je analiza osredotočila na verjetnost ponovnega pojava znatne škode, če bi bili obstoječi ukrepi razveljavljeni.
In this respect, the lack of impact of the existing measures on Russian import volumes and prices was analysed.
V zvezi s tem je bilo analizirano pomanjkanje vpliva obstoječih ukrepov na obseg ruskega uvoza in cene.
In addition, the possible effects of the existing Russian spare capacity and possible new capacity as well as the likelihood of redirection of other sales by the Russian producers to the Community were examined.
Poleg tega so bili proučeni tudi možni vplivi ruskih neizkoriščenih in možnih novih zmogljivosti ter verjetnost preusmeritve druge prodaje ruskih proizvajalcev v Skupnost.
Lack of impact of the existing measures on import volumes and prices
Pomanjkanje vpliva obstoječih ukrepov na obseg uvoza in cene
As illustrated in the table below, since 2002, the Russian export prices of the product concerned to the Community have always been above the MIP of EUR 115 per tonne, whereas as of 2003 to the end of the period considered, these prices were significantly above the MIP.
Kot je prikazano v spodnji tabeli, so bile po letu 2002 ruske izvozne cene zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost vedno nad MIP v višini 115 EUR na tono, od leta 2003 do konca obravnavanega obdobja pa so bile celo znatno nad MIP.
During the RIP, average Russian export prices to the Community market were 68 % above the MIP.
Povprečne ruske izvozne cene na trg Skupnosti so bile med OPP 68 % nad MIP.
This clearly shows that at least since 2003, the Russian export prices have not been influenced by the existing measures.
To pomeni, da obstoječi ukrepi vsaj po letu 2002 niso vplivali na ruske izvozne cene.
Source: Eurostat for Russian export prices.
Vir: Podatki Eurostata za ruske izvozne cene.
Average unit price (EUR/tonne)
Povprečna cena na enoto (EUR/tono)
Russian average export price
Povprečna ruska izvozna cena
Russian prices above MIP (%)
Ruske cene nad MIP (v %)
Therefore, ceteris paribus, there is no reason why the Russian exporting producers would apply lower prices if the existing measures were repealed, considering they have managed to sustain much higher prices before.
Zato ni razloga, da bi ruski proizvajalci izvozniki v primeru razveljavitve obstoječih ukrepov uporabljali nižje cene, glede na to, da so pred tem lahko vzdrževali precej višje cene.
Moreover, as shown in recital 67, the Russian exporters have kept their export volumes to the Community market at a relatively stable level over the whole period considered, despite the fact that the existing measures have had no practical effect on the export prices since 2002 and have consequently not constituted any hindrance to increasing Russian exports.
Poleg tega je, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 67, obseg izvoza ruskih izvoznikov na trg Skupnosti v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju ostal relativno stabilen, ne glede na to, da obstoječi ukrepi po letu 2002 niso imeli nobenega praktičnega vpliva na izvozne cene in zato niso pomenili nobene ovire za naraščajoči ruski izvoz.
Therefore, ceteris paribus, it is unlikely that Russian exporting producers would sell additional volumes on the Community market if the existing measures were repealed, as the existing measures have not affected the Russian export volumes.
Zato ni verjetno, da bi ruski proizvajalci izvozniki na trg Skupnosti prodali več, če bi bili obstoječi ukrepi razveljavljeni, zlasti ker ne vplivajo na obseg ruskega izvoza.
It is therefore concluded that since the existing measures have had no impact either on the export prices practiced by the Russian exporters or the prices paid by the Community importers for the same imports, or on the quantities of Russian exports to the Community, the removal of the measures is unlikely to have any impact on such prices or quantities.
Ker obstoječi ukrepi niso vplivali niti na izvozne cene ruskih izvoznikov niti na cene, ki so jih za ta izvoz plačevali uvozniki v Skupnost, ali na količino ruskega izvoza v Skupnost, se sklene, da razveljavitev ukrepov verjetno ne bi vplivala na take cene ali količino.
Therefore, the removal of the measures would have no impact on the situation of the Community industry.
Razveljavitev ukrepov ne bi vplivala na stanje industrije Skupnosti.
Consequently, it cannot be concluded that there is a likelihood of recurrence of injury to the Community industry, if the existing measures were repealed.
Zato ni mogoče skleniti, da obstaja v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov verjetnost ponovitve škode industriji Skupnosti.
Notwithstanding the above conclusion, the different allegations of the Community industry relating to the possible effects of existing Russian spare capacity and possible new capacity and the likelihood of redirection of other sales of the Russian producers to the Community were also examined in the investigation, as explained below.
Ne glede na zgoraj navedeni sklep so bili, kot je navedeno v nadaljevanju, v preiskavi proučene tudi različne trditve industrije Skupnosti v zvezi z možnimi vplivi obstoječih ruskih neizkoriščenih zmogljivosti in možnih novih zmogljivosti ter verjetnosti preusmeritve ostale prodaje v Skupnosti.
Russian spare capacity
Ruske neizkoriščene zmogljivosti
As explained in recitals 46 and 50, none of the sampled Russian companies had spare capacity of any significance during the RIP and the overall spare capacity level of all Russian producers was estimated to be around 5 %.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 46 in 50, nobena od vzorčenih ruskih družb med OPP ni imela pomembnih neizkoriščenih zmogljivosti, skupna stopnja neizkoriščenih zmogljivosti pa je bila ocenjena na približno 5 %.
The findings of the investigation are, in this respect, wholly in line with what has been argued by the applicant.
Ugotovitve preiskave so v tem delu popolnoma v skladu s trditvami vložnika.
As already mentioned in recital 52, it has also been established that the nine projects referred to by the applicant are not expected to lead to a significant negative effect on the Community market, since a significant part of the additional quantity created by such projects will be used captively.
Kot je že navedeno v uvodni izjavi 52, se ne pričakuje, da bi devet projektov, ki jih navaja vložnik, znatno negativno vplivalo na trg Skupnosti, ker se bo znatni del dodatne količine, izdelane v okviru teh projektov, uporabil za lastne namene.
In addition, as mentioned in recital 54, Russian exports to the Community would be likely to increase in significant quantities only if there is an equivalent increase in demand, in which case such additional exports should not have a negative effect on the price level on the Community market.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 54, je možno, da bi se ruski izvoz v Skupnost znatno povečal le, če bi se ustrezno povečalo povpraševanje, kar pomeni, da tak dodatni izvoz ne bi negativno vplival na ravni cen na trgu Skupnosti.
On the basis of the above, it is concluded that the Russian producers will have only limited additional quantities available for increased sales due to revamps, upgrades and de-bottlenecking.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega se sklene, da bodo imeli ruski proizvajalci za povečano prodajo zaradi prenov, nadgradenj in boljše organizacije razpoložljivo samo omejeno dodatno količino.
This indicates that the Russian producers would not be able to significantly increase their export sales to the Community market by virtue of Russian spare capacities.
Iz tega lahko sklepamo, da ruski proizvajalci z uporabo svojih neizkoriščenih zmogljivosti ne bi imeli možnosti za znatno povečanje svojega izvoza na trg Skupnosti.
As indicated above in recital 67, the imports from Russia to the Community market have remained relatively stable throughout the period considered, accounting for around 16 % market share of the Community consumption throughout the period considered, except for a peak in 2004 (around 20 %).
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 67, je uvoz iz Rusije na trg Skupnosti v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju ostal relativno stabilen, pomenil je približno 16 % tržnega deleža potrošnje Skupnosti, razen v vrhuncu leta 2004 (približno 20 %).
This is despite the fact that, as shown above, the existing measures have had no practical effect on the export prices and export quantities during the whole of the period considered and have consequently not constituted a hindrance to increasing Russian exports.
In to kljub dejstvu, da, kot je navedeno zgoraj, obstoječi ukrepi v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju niso imeli praktičnega vpliva na izvozne cene in količino izvoza ter zato niso pomenili nobene ovire za naraščajoči ruski izvoz.
The investigation has shown that during the RIP, export prices of the sampled exporting producers to the Community on an ex-works basis were about 1 % to 5 % lower than export prices to other third countries.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so bile med OPP izvozne cene v Skupnost vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov na podlagi cene franko tovarna za 1–5 % nižje od izvoznih cen drugih tretjih držav.
As indicated in recital 56, Russian ex-works domestic sales prices were also higher than export prices to the Community, in particular for companies in remote areas, due to the significant differences in transport costs as mentioned already.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 56, so bile ruske domače prodajne cene franko tovarna zaradi znatnih razlik v stroških prevoza višje od izvozne cene v Skupnost, zlasti za družbe s sedežem v oddaljenih območjih.
On this basis it can be concluded that as far as prices are concerned, the Community market is not particularly attractive as compared to other main markets for Russian producers.
Na podlagi tega se lahko sklene, da trg Skupnosti glede cen za ruske proizvajalce ni tako privlačen kot njihovi ostali glavni trgi.
Furthermore, as mentioned in recital 57, the applicant has argued that production stemming from additional capacities being built in particular in North Africa (Algeria and Egypt) and the Middle East (Iran) would put pressure on the worldwide prices, thereby reducing the Russian exporters’ penetration capacity on those markets and leading them to increase their export quantities to the Community market.
Poleg tega je vložnik, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 57, trdil, da bi proizvodnja, ki narašča zaradi dodatnih zmogljivosti, ki se gradijo v Severni Afriki (Alžirija in Egipt) in na Bližnjem vzhodu (Iran), dodatno vplivala na svetovne cene ter tako zmanjšala sposobnost ruskih proizvajalcev za prodor na te trge ter jih usmerila v povečanje izvoza na trg Skupnosti.
In this respect, it was established on the basis of the forecasts referred to in recital 54 that these investments will not have a significant impact on the worldwide supply/demand balance, as global demand is predicted to increase in line with global capacity.
V zvezi s tem je bilo na podlagi napovedi iz uvodne izjave 54 ugotovljeno, da zadevne naložbe ne bodo znatno vplivale na svetovno ravnotežje ponudbe/povpraševanja, ker se predvideva, da bo svetovno povpraševanje raslo vzporedno z zmogljivostmi.
Furthermore, the investigation has shown that the Russians have already lost significant shares in the Asian (especially the People’s Republic of China) and African markets and that they are holding quite well the pressure in the Latin American markets.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da je Rusija že izgubila znatne deleže na azijskih (zlasti Ljudska republika Kitajska) in afriških trgih in da se pritisk povečuje tudi na latinskoameriških trgih.
Considering the predicted global supply/demand balance, the argument that Russian exporting producers may lose additional market shares everywhere but Europe seems unlikely.
Glede na predvideno svetovno ravnotežje ponudbe/povpraševanja se trditev, da lahko ruski proizvajalci izgubijo dodatne tržne deleže povsod razen v Evropi, ne zdi verjetna.
It has been argued by the applicant that the unfair cost advantage enjoyed by the Russian producers due to the existence of the double pricing of gas could lead to a significant undercutting by the Russian exporters, inter alia, if the international supply/demand balance were to become unfavourable.
Vložnik je trdil, da bi lahko nepravična stroškovna prednost, ki so jo uživali ruski proizvajalci zaradi dvojnega zaračunavanja plina, povzročila znatno nelojalno nižanje cen ruskih izvoznikov, med drugim, če mednarodno ravnotežje ponudbe in povpraševanja ne bi bilo več ugodno.
While this cannot be excluded because the investigation has shown that the cost structure of the Russian exporters is indeed significantly distorted by the double pricing of gas practised by Russia, the potential undercutting would not be a direct consequence of the removal of the measures, but due to other circumstances.
Tega sicer ni mogoče izključiti, saj je preiskava pokazala, da rusko dvojno zaračunavanje cen plina dejansko izkrivlja stroškovno strukturo ruskih izvoznikov, vendar pa morebitno nelojalno nižanje cen ne bi bilo neposredna posledica razveljavitve ukrepov, ampak drugačna okoliščina.
It cannot therefore be concluded that it is the Russian producers’ intention to redirect any significant part of the volumes currently exported to third countries or sold on the domestic market to the Community market or to reduce their prices as a consequence of the removal of the measures, even if it cannot be excluded that this may happen due to other circumstances.
Zato ni mogoče sklepati, da nameravajo ruski proizvajalci preusmeriti znaten del zadevnih izdelkov, ki se trenutno izvažajo v tretje države ali prodajajo na domačem trgu, na trg Skupnosti ali v bližnji prihodnosti znižati svoje cene zaradi razveljavitve ukrepov, čeprav ni mogoče izključiti, da bi do tega zaradi drugačnih okoliščin lahko prišlo.
As shown above, the existing measures have had no impact either on the export prices practiced by the Russian exporters or the prices paid by the Community importers for the same imports, or on the Russian export volumes to the Community market.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, obstoječi ukrepi niso vplivali niti na izvozne cene ruskih izvoznikov ali na cene, ki so jih za ta uvoz plačevali uvozniki v Skupnost, niti na obseg ruskega izvoza na trg Skupnosti.
At the same time, despite the continuation of dumped imports from Russia, the Community industry has not suffered any injury.
Hkrati pa industrija Skupnosti kljub nadaljevanju uvoza iz Rusije ni utrpela nobene škode.
Therefore the repeal of the existing measures will not have any impact on the Russian export prices or volumes and thus no impact on the situation of the Community industry.
Zato razveljavitev obstoječih ukrepov ne bo vplivala na ruske izvozne cene ali obseg izvoza in tako tudi ne na stanje industrije Skupnosti.
Moreover, the analysis of other exogenous factors alleged by the applicant does not put into question the above conclusion, since they do not even indicate any reasonable possibility of increasing the volumes and decreasing the prices of the Russian imports to the Community market due to exogenous factors.
Poleg tega analiza ostalih zunanjih dejavnikov, ki jih je navedel vložnik, ne spremeni zgornjega sklepa, saj ne pomenijo nobene dejanske možnosti za povečanje obsega ali znižanja cen ruskega uvoza na trg Skupnosti.
On the basis of the above, it cannot be concluded that there is a likelihood of recurrence of injury to the Community industry if the existing measures are repealed.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega ni mogoče sklepati, da obstaja v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov verjetnost ponovitve škode industriji Skupnosti.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it is intended to recommend that the existing measures be repealed.
Vse stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se namerava priporočiti razveljavitev obstoječih ukrepov.
It follows from the above that, as provided for by Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of urea originating in Russia should be repealed and the proceeding terminated.
Iz zgoraj navedenega sledi, kot je navedeno v členu 11(2) osnovne uredbe, da je treba razveljaviti protidampinške ukrepe, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz sečnine s poreklom iz Rusije, in zaključiti postopek.