natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As of 2008, however, when the analogue terrestrial network will be switched off and SVT will no longer be obliged to make parallel transmissions in analogue and digital mode, the information suggested that SVT's annual payments would exceed Teracom's costs of transmitting SVT: from 2008 until 2013, SVT would, every year, pay Teracom considerably in excess of its transmission costs.
Vendar pa je bilo iz informacij razvidno, da bi od leta 2008, ko bo analogno prizemno omrežje izklopljeno in SVT ne bo več treba opravljati vzporednega analognega in digitalnega prenosa, letna plačila SVT presegla stroške družbe Teracom za prenos SVT: od leta 2008 do leta 2013 bi SVT vsako leto družbi Teracom precej preplačala stroške prenosa.
In 2013, SVT's payments were estimated at 2,3 times the size of its transmission costs.
Leta 2013 bi plačila SVT po ocenah 2,3-krat presegala stroške prenosa.
Such payments would more than offset Teracom's initial losses and would allow Teracom a cumulated profit of SEK 509,61 million by 2013.
Ta plačila bi več kot nadomestila začetne izgube družbe Teracom in ji omogočila, da do leta 2013 ustvari dobiček v višini 509,61 milijona SEK.
The Commission had doubts that this profit would be the result of normal market conditions and was concerned that the profit might constitute State aid in favour of Teracom (see the opening Decision, paragraph 32).
Komisija je podvomila, da bi ta dobiček izhajal iz običajnih tržnih pogojev, in je imela pomisleke, da bi ta dobiček lahko bil državna pomoč v korist družbe Teracom (glej odstavek 32 odločitve s sprožitvi postopka).
Table 2:
Preglednica 2
SVT's transmission fee payments to Teracom from 2002 to 2013 as presented in the opening Decision
Plačila SVT družbi Teracom za prenos od leta 2002 do leta 2013, predstavljena v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka
Payments from SVT to Teracom (1)
Plačila SVT družbi Teracom (1)
Teracom's costs of transmitting SVT in analogue (2)
Stroški družbe Teracom za analogni prenos SVT (2)
Teracom's costs of transmitting SVT in digital (3)
Stroški družbe Teracom za digitalni prenos SVT (3)
Teracom's total costs of transmitting SVT
Letni dobiček/izguba družbe Teracom
Teracom's predicted annual profits
Predvideni letni dobiček družbe Teracom
Teracom's predicted cumulated profits/losses (6)
Predvideni letni dobiček družbe Teracom (5 = 4 + 1)
The State guarantee issued in favour of Teracom
Državno poroštvo, izdano v korist družbe Teracom
On the basis of the information available at the time of the opening Decision, the Commission had reason to suspect that a credit guarantee was issued in favour of, or at least was available to, Teracom.
Komisija je imela na podlagi informacij, ki so ji bile na voljo ob odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka, razlog za sum, da je bilo kreditno poroštvo izdano v korist družbe Teracom oziroma ga je družba imela vsaj na voljo.
During 2001, for reasons mainly related to Teracom's investments in digital terrestrial television, the predictions concerning Teracom's solvency were not very optimistic and it was expected that its solvency would continue to fall.
Leta 2001 napovedi v zvezi s solventnostjo družbe Teracom predvsem zaradi njenih naložb v digitalno prizemno televizijo niso bile preveč optimistične in po tedanjih pričakovanjih naj bi se njena solventnost še poslabšala.
As a consequence, there was a serious risk that Teracom would not only fail to respect its contracts for the transmission of SVT and TV4's programmes but also have no means for developing and operating the digital terrestrial network as a whole.
Zaradi tega je bila družba Teracom v resni nevarnosti, da ne bo mogla spoštovati pogodb za prenos programov SVT in TV4 ter da ne bo imela sredstev za razvoj in upravljanje digitalnega prizemnega omrežja kot celote.
In addition, there was a risk that Teracom would not be able to honour its creditors.
Poleg tega je obstajalo tveganje, da ne bo mogla izplačati svojih upnikov.
A Government proposal of November 2001 recommended that a credit guarantee amounting to a maximum of SEK 2000 million (approximately €210 million) be given to Teracom.
Vlada je novembra 2001 v predlogu priporočila, naj se družbi Teracom dodeli kreditno poroštvo v višini največ 2000 milijonov SEK(približno 210 milijonov EUR).
Teracom would be charged a fee to cover the risks and administrative costs involved in granting the guarantee and the guarantee was limited in time.
Družba Teracom bi morala plačati kritje tveganja in upravne stroške dodelitve poroštva, poroštvo pa je bilo časovno omejeno.
This proposal was approved by Parliament in February 2002.
Parlament je februarja 2002 odobril ta predlog.
According to the information available to the Commission at the time of the opening Decision, subsequent to the approval, the Government took a decision to issue a credit guarantee in favour of Teracom.
Po informacijah, ki jih je imela Komisija na voljo ob odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka, je vlada po odobritvi odločila, da bo izdala kreditno poroštvo v korist družbe Teracom.
The Commission explains the application of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty to credit guarantees granted by a Member State in its Notice on State aid in the form of guarantees (the ‘Notice on Guarantees’).
Komisija pojasnjuje uporabo člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES za kreditna poroštva, ki jih odobrijo države članice, v Obvestilu o državni pomoči v obliki poroštev („Obvestilo o poroštvih“).
According to section 4 of the Notice on Guarantees, only the fulfilment of all of a number of conditions ensures that an individual State guarantee does not constitute State aid under Article 87(1).
V skladu z oddelkom 4 Obvestila o poroštvih samo izpolnitev vseh pogojev zagotavlja, da posamezno državno poroštvo ni državna pomoč po členu 87(1).
On the basis of the background to the credit guarantee and the reasons for the decision to issue a guarantee — as explained in the opening Decision (Teracom's poor financial situation and falling solvency), the Commission had reason to believe that the conditions set out in section 4 of the Notice on Guarantees might not have been fulfilled and that the credit guarantee constituted State aid to Teracom.
Komisija je lahko na podlagi ozadja kreditnega poroštva in razlogov odločitve za izdajo poroštva, kot je pojasnjeno v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka (slabo finančno stanje in upadajoča solventnost družbe Teracom), sklepala, da pogoji, določeni v oddelku 4 Obvestila o poroštvih, najbrž niso bili izpolnjeni in da je kreditno poroštvo državna pomoč družbi Teracom.
On the basis of information concerning Teracom's financial position available at the time of the opening Decision, the Commission could not exclude that the conditional shareholder contribution in the form of a capital injection constituted State aid to Teracom.
Komisija na podlagi informacij o finančnem stanju družbe Teracom, ki so ji bile na voljo ob odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka, ni mogla izključiti možnosti, da je pogojni delniški vložek v obliki dokapitalizacije državna pomoč družbi Teracom.
Although Teracom had started a reorganisation of the entire Group's activities in 2002 to improve its financial situation and sales forecasts were improving, Teracom still made losses and its solvency kept falling.
Čeprav je družba Teracom leta 2002 začela reorganizirati dejavnosti celotne skupine, da bi izboljšala svoje finančno stanje, in so se prodajne napovedi izboljšale, je imela še vedno izgubo in njena solventnost je še vedno upadala.
According to the information available to the Commission at the time of the opening Decision, Teracom's solvency ratio was at 20 % at the end of 2002 while its lenders required that the solvency ratio be at a level of 25 % (the level for the Group was, according to the Commission's information, apparently 30 %).
Po informacijah, ki jih je imela Komisija na voljo ob odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka, je stopnja solventnosti družbe Teracom konec leta 2002 znašala 20 %, posojilodajalci pa so zahtevali, da je stopnja solventnosti 25 % (stopnja solventnosti skupine naj bi po informacijah Komisije znašala 30 %).
Both Teracom and its lenders therefore requested that a capital injection be granted to Teracom.
Družba Teracom in njeni posojilodajalci so zato zahtevali, naj se odobri dokapitalizacija družbe Teracom.
According to the Commission's information, the Government concluded that Teracom's dire financial situation was of a temporary nature, triggered by high investment and operating costs, and that in the long term Teracom would be a viable company with a strong position in the marketplace and a serious business model.
Po informacijah Komisije je vlada ugotovila, da je bilo slabo finančno stanje družbe Teracom začasno, povzročili pa so ga visoki stroški naložb in poslovanja, in da je dolgoročno Teracom uspešna družba s trdnim položajem na trgu in resnim poslovnim modelom.
In March 2003, the Government proposed that Parliament should authorise it to grant Teracom a conditional shareholder contribution in the form of a capital injection amounting to approximately SEK 500 million (approximately €52,5 million).
Marca 2003 je vlada parlamentu predlagala, naj jo pooblasti, da družbi Teracom dodeli pogojni delniški vložek v obliki dokapitalizacije v višini približno 500 milijonov SEK (približno 52,5 milijona EUR).
After approval by Parliament in May 2003 and the signing of an agreement with Teracom in June 2003, the State granted Teracom the conditional shareholder contribution.
Potem ko je parlament maja 2003 to odobril in po podpisu pogodbe z družbo Teracom junija 2003 je država družbi Teracom dodelila pogojni delniški vložek.
In March 2003, prior to the adoption of the proposal, the Government informed the Commission about its intention to put forward a proposal to Parliament about the capital injection.
Marca 2003, pred sprejetjem predloga, je vlada obvestila Komisijo, da namerava parlamentu predložiti predlog o dokapitalizaciji.
According to the Government, however, this did not constitute a formal notification to the Commission.
Vendar pa po trditvah vlade to ni bilo uradno obvestilo Komisiji.
The information available to the Commission indicated, therefore, that prior to the capital injection Teracom's solvency was lower than the requested 25 %.
Po informacijah, ki jih je imela Komisija na voljo, je bila torej solventnost družbe Teracom pred dokapitalizacijo nižja od zahtevanih 25 %.
This led the Commission to conclude that the transaction may not have taken place on conditions similar to those on the private credit market (i.e., that a private creditor would have taken the same decision to inject capital into Teracom).
Na podlagi tega je Komisija ugotovila, da transakcija najbrž ni bila opravljena pod pogoji, podobnimi pogojem na trgu zasebnih posojil (torej da bi zasebni upnik sprejel enako odločitev o dokapitalizaciji družbe Teracom).
The Commission could, therefore, not exclude that the capital injection constituted State aid.
Komisija zato ni mogla izključiti možnosti, da je bila dokapitalizacija državna pomoč.
The information available to the Commission at the time the procedure was initiated suggested that it could not be excluded that all three alleged State aid measures met the requirements of Article 87(1) and, therefore, constituted State aid.
Glede na informacije, ki jih je imela Komisija na voljo ob sprožitvi postopka, ni bilo mogoče zaključiti, da vsi trije domnevni ukrepi državne pomoči izpolnjujejo zahteve člena 87(1), in so bili torej državna pomoč.
In addition, at the time of the opening Decision, the Commission had no information suggesting that the aid would be compatible with the EC Treaty.
Poleg tega Komisija ob odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka ni imela nobenih informacij o tem, da naj bi bila pomoč združljiva s Pogodbo ES.
None of the derogations provided for in Articles 87(2), 87(3) or 86(2) seemed to be applicable and it was problematic that Sweden appeared to have disregarded the principle of technological neutrality during the digitalisation process.
Videti je bilo, da se ne uporablja nobeno odstopanje iz členov 87(2), 87(3) ali 86(2) in bilo je sporno, da Švedska očitno ni upoštevala načela tehnološke nevtralnosti med procesom digitalizacije.
The Commission therefore initiated the formal investigation procedure to provide Sweden and interested parties the opportunity to submit their comments on the Commission's preliminary assessment as set out in the opening Decision.
Komisija je zato sprožila formalni postopek preiskave ter Švedski in zainteresiranim strankam dala priložnost, da predložijo pripombe o predhodni oceni Komisije, navedeni v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka.
Bredband AB (‘B2’)
Bredband AB („B2“)
agrees with all the allegations set out in the opening Decision.
Družba B2 se strinja z navedbami v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka.
According to B2, the advantages granted to Teracom are capable of distorting competition not only for digital satellite but also for digital cable.
Po trditvah družbe B2 lahko prednosti, odobrene družbi Teracom, izkrivijo konkurenco ne le na področju digitalne satelitske platforme, temveč tudi na področju digitalne kabelske platforme.
For broadband distribution, multicast television will become a major product in the next few years.
Pri širokopasovnem prenosu bo televizija z oddajanjem več prejemnikom (multicast) v naslednjih nekaj letih postala zelo razširjena storitev.
ECCA has no specific comments on the information presented in the opening Decision, but welcomes the Commission's examination of digital terrestrial services in Sweden.
Združenje ECCA nima posebnih pripomb na informacije, predstavljene v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka, vendar odobrava preiskavo digitalnih prizemnih storitev na Švedskem, ki jo opravlja Komisija.
This is particularly because several Member States are intervening to finance new infrastructure and, especially, digital terrestrial networks and services.
Predvsem zato, ker več držav članic z intervencijami financira nove infrastrukture, zlasti digitalna prizemna omrežja in storitve.
According to ECCA, these policies already influence customers' behaviour vis-à-vis cable services.
Po trditvah ECCA te politike že vplivajo na vedenje potrošnikov v zvezi s kabelskim storitvami.
In addition, according to ECCA, the procedures and conditions set for these platforms by national and regional authorities are discriminatory in nature and have the effect of putting other platform operators at a competitive disadvantage.
Poleg tega ECCA trdi, da so postopki in pogoji, ki jih za te platforme določijo nacionalni in regionalni organi, diskriminacijski in so zaradi njih operaterji drugih platform v podrejenem konkurenčnem položaju.
According to ECCA, capital investors are reluctant to invest in infrastructure if it is likely that public authorities will promote the establishment of a competing infrastructure capable of offering the same types of services at subsidised prices.
Po trditvah ECCA vlagatelji kapitala neradi vlagajo v infrastrukturo, če je verjetno, da bodo organi oblasti spodbujali vzpostavitev konkurenčne infrastrukture, ki lahko zagotavlja enake storitve po subvencioniranih cenah.
This could have very negative effects on the availability of financing needed to consolidate this branch of the cable industry, upgrade networks and introduce new services.
To lahko zelo negativno vpliva na razpoložljivost finančnih sredstev, ki so potrebna za utrditev te veje kabelske industrije, posodobitev omrežij in uvedbo novih storitev.
According to ESOA, the Swedish authorities grant unlawful State aid to Teracom.
Po trditvah združenja ESOA so švedski organi družbi Teracom dodelili nezakonito državno pomoč.
The effect of the aid is to favour the terrestrial technological solution over others such as cable and satellite solutions, which distorts competition because State aid enables Teracom to reduce costs and undercut prices set by normal market conditions.
Zaradi te pomoči imajo prizemne tehnološke rešitve prednost pred drugimi rešitvami, kot sta kabelska in satelitska, kar izkrivlja konkurenco, ker državna pomoč družbi Teracom omogoča, da zmanjša stroške in nelojalno niža cene, ki jih določajo običajni tržni pogoji.
According to ESOA, the operation of satellites for digital television transmission requires significant investment.
ESOA trdi, da upravljanje satelitov za digitalni televizijski prenos zahteva precejšne naložbe.
Nevertheless, in an undistorted market, satellites are strong competitors to terrestrial (including cable) digital solutions.
Vendar pa so na neizkrivljenem trgu sateliti močna konkurenca prizemnim (tudi kabelskim) digitalnim rešitvam.
Given that the transition from analogue to digital transmission is ongoing throughout the European Union, ESOA is concerned that interventions similar to those seen in Sweden may be occurring in other Member States as well.
Glede na to, da poteka prehod z analognega na digitalno razširjanje po vsej Evropski uniji, je ESOA zaskrbljena, da bi se lahko intervencije, podobne švedskim, dogajale tudi v drugih državah članicah.
NSAB stands by the arguments advanced in its complaint and supplementary submissions and agrees with the allegations as set out in the opening Decision.
Družba NSAB vztraja pri argumentih, ki jih je predložila v svoji pritožbi in dodatnih pripombah, ter se strinja z navedbami v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka.
It doubts, however, whether the figures communicated by the Swedish authorities in response to the opening Decision correspond to all payments made by SVT to Teracom and whether they give a fair and accurate picture of the amounts actually being paid.
Vendar pa dvomi, da podatki, ki so jih švedski organi sporočili v odgovoru na odločitev o sprožitvi postopka, zajemajo vsa plačila SVT družbi Teracom ter da pravično in ustrezno prikazujejo dejansko plačane zneske.
It therefore urges the Commission to demand further information and explanations from the Government.
Zato poziva Komisijo, naj od vlade zahteva dodatne informacije in pojasnila.
With regard to the Government's arguments in favour of digital terrestrial broadcasting as against digital satellite broadcasting, NSAB notes that in some neighbouring countries there are only relatively few households that cannot receive satellite broadcasts.
NSAB v zvezi z argumentom vlade, ki daje prednost digitalnemu prizemnemu prenosu pred digitalnim satelitskim prenosom, ugotavlja, da je v nekaterih sosednjih državah sorazmerno malo gospodinjstev, ki ne morejo sprejemati satelitskih prenosov.
In addition, it points out that in countries such as, for example, Finland 10 % of households within adequate digital terrestrial network coverage experience reception problems.
Poleg tega poudarja, da ima v državah, kot je na primer Finska, 10 % gospodinjstev v območjih, pokritih z ustreznim digitalnim prizemnim omrežjem, težave s sprejemom.
It states further that, according to the BBC, 25 % of households in the United Kingdom cannot watch digital terrestrial television owing to poor aerial installations.
Poleg tega navaja, da po podatkih družbe BBC 25 % gospodinjstev v Združenem kraljestvu ne more gledati digitalne prizemne televizije zaradi slabih antenskih napeljav.
Finally, NSAB questions the neutrality of the report by Öhrlings PriceWaterhouseCoopers (‘PWC’) concerning the capital injection to the Teracom Group.
Nazadnje NSAB dvomi o nevtralnosti poročila družbe Öhrlings PriceWaterhouseCoopers („PWC“), kar zadeva dokapitalizacijo skupine Teracom.
It also claims that the report based its business forecast for Teracom on some over-optimistic assumptions, for example with respect to the expected number of subscribers.
Trdi tudi, da je poslovna napoved za družbo Tercom v poročilu temeljila na preveč optimističnih predpostavkah, na primer glede pričakovanega števila naročnikov.
Telenor Broadcast does not take a position on whether the alleged measures in the present case constitute State aid.
Družba Telenor Broadcast se ni opredelila glede tega, ali je domnevni ukrep v zadevnem primeru državna pomoč.
However, it stresses that aid provided to the digital terrestrial platform will put other platform operators at a competitive disadvantage; both in the distribution markets, where television services are offered to consumers, and in the transmission markets, where infrastructure transmission capacity is offered to broadcasters.
Vendar pa poudarja, da bodo zaradi pomoči, dodeljene digitalni prizemni platformi, operaterji drugih platform v podrejenem konkurenčnem položaju na distribucijskih trgih, na katerih se televizijske storitve ponujajo uporabnikom, in na trgih za prenos, kjer se prenosna zmogljivost infrastrukture ponuja radijskim in televizijskim postajam.
Teracom (including Boxer) is active as a provider of both transmission services to broadcasters and television services to consumers, and will be able to use the State aid to subsidise both activities.
Družba Teracom (vključno z družbo Boxer) zagotavlja storitve prenosa televizijskim in radijskim postajam, uporabnikom pa televizijske storitve, in bo lahko državno pomoč uporabila za subvencioniranje obeh dejavnosti.
In the downstream television distribution market this can be done either by offering the television services at lower prices or offering more set-top-boxes than would otherwise be economically feasible without the State aid.
Na prodajnem trgu za razširjanje televizijskih prgramov lahko to opravi tako, da ponuja televizijske storitve po nižjih cenah ali pa ponudi več dekoderjev, kot bi to bilo ekonomsko izvedljivo brez državne pomoči.
According to Telenor Broadcast, this is of critical importance at this stage of the development towards a single market for all platforms.
Po trditvah družbe Telenor Broadcast je to nadvse pomembno na tej stopnji razvoja enotnega trga za vse platforme.
Telenor Broadcast also raises the question whether the obligation for SVT to cover 99,8 % of the Swedish population via the terrestrial network in itself constitutes State aid, and questions whether terrestrial transmission is the most cost-efficient means of distributing television.
Družba Telenor Broadcast se tudi sprašuje, ali obveznost SVT glede pokrivanja 99,8 % švedskega prebivalstva s prizemnim omrežjem sama po sebi pomeni državno pomoč in ali je prizemni prenos stroškovno najbolj učinkovit način razširjanja televizijskih programov.
TeliaSonera does not take a position on whether the alleged measures in the present case are compatible with the EC Treaty.
Družba Telenor Broadcast se ni opredelila glede tega, ali so domnevni ukrepi v zadevnem primeru združljivi s Pogodbo ES.
However, it emphasises the importance of competitive neutrality among various technical infrastructures in the television distribution marketplace.
Vendar pa poudarja pomen konkurenčne nevtralnosti med različnimi tehničnimi infrastrukturami na distribucijskem trgu za televizijske programe.
UGC does not take a position on whether the alleged measures in the present case are compatible with the EC Treaty.
Družba UGC se ni opredelila glede tega, ali so domnevni ukrepi v zadevnem primeru združljivi s Pogodbo ES.
At the same time, however, it strongly supports the Commission's investigation.
Hkrati pa zelo podpira preiskavo, ki jo opravlja Komisija.
It further maintains that State-sponsored competition can only serve to distort the market.
Poleg tega trdi, da lahko konkurenca s sponzorstvom države resno izkrivlja trg.
In its view, there can be no justification for State involvement in the development of digital terrestrial television based on a public interest argument.
Meni, da ni upravičena vključenost države v razvoj digitalne prizemne televizije na podlagi argumenta o javnem interesu.
Should it be in the public interest to provide digital television, there are many alternative infrastructures that can do so.
Če je zagotavljanje digitalne televizije v javnem interesu, lahko to opravljajo številne druge infrastrukture.
Viasat welcomes the Commission's investigation and takes the view that it is clear from the opening Decision that Teracom (including Boxer) has received considerable funding from State resources which constitute unlawful State aid.
Viasat odobrava preiskavo Komisije in meni, da je iz odločitve o sprožitvi postopka razvidno, da je družba Teracom (vključno z družbo Boxer) prejela precejšnja finančna sredstva iz državnih virov, kar pomeni nezakonito državno pomoč.