natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Regularisation of applications
Dopolnitev tožb
If an application does not comply with the following requirements set out in Article 44(3) to (5) of the Rules of Procedure, it shall not be served on the defendant and a reasonable period shall be prescribed for the purposes of putting the application in order:
Če tožba ne izpolnjuje naslednjih pogojev, določenih v členu 44, od (3) do (5), se ne vroči toženi stranki, določi pa se razumni rok za njeno dopolnitev:
production of the certificate of the lawyer's authorisation to practise (Article 44(3) of the Rules of Procedure);
predložitev potrdila, iz katerega izhaja, da je odvetnik upravičen za zastopanje (člen 44(3) Poslovnika);
proof of the existence in law of a legal person governed by private law (Article 44(5)(a) of the Rules of Procedure);
dokaz o pravnem obstoju pravne osebe zasebnega prava [člen 44(5)(a) Poslovnika];
authority (Article 44(5)(b) of the Rules of Procedure);
pooblastilo [člen 44(5)(b) Poslovnika];
proof that that authority has been properly conferred by someone authorised for the purpose (Article 44(5)(b) of the Rules of Procedure);
dokaz, da je odvetnika pravilno pooblastila za to pooblaščena oseba [člen 44(5)(b) Poslovnika];
production of the contested measure (action for annulment) or of the documentary evidence of the date on which the institution was requested to act (action for failure to act) (second paragraph of Article 21 of the Statute of the Court of Justice; Article 44(4) of the Rules of Procedure).
predložitev izpodbijanega akta (ničnostna tožba) ali pa listine, ki dokazuje datum poziva k ukrepanju (tožba zaradi nedelovanja) (člen 21, drugi odstavek, Statuta Sodišča; člen 44(4) Poslovnika).
In intellectual property cases in which the lawfulness of a decision of a Board of Appeal of OHIM is called into question, an application which does not comply with the following requirements under Article 132 of the Rules of Procedure shall not be served on the other party/parties, and a reasonable period shall be prescribed for the purposes of putting the application in order:
V zadevah s področja prava intelektualne lastnine, v katerih se izpodbija zakonitost odločbe odbora za pritožbe UUNT, se tožba, ki ne izpolnjuje naslednjih pogojev iz člena 132 Poslovnika, ne vroči drugi/drugim strankam, določi pa se primeren rok za njeno dopolnitev:
the names and addresses of the parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal (first subparagraph of Article 132(1) of the Rules of Procedure);
imena in naslove strank v postopku pred odborom za pritožbe (člen 132(1), prvi pododstavek, Poslovnika);
the date on which the decision of the Board of Appeal was notified (second subparagraph of Article 132(1) of the Rules of Procedure);
datum vročitve odločbe odbora za pritožbe (člen 132(1), drugi pododstavek, Poslovnika);
the contested decision annexed (second subparagraph of Article 132(1) of the Rules of Procedure).
izpodbijano odločbo v prilogi (člen 132(1), drugi pododstavek, Poslovnika).
If an application does not comply with the following procedural rules, service of the application shall be delayed and a reasonable period shall be prescribed for the purposes of putting the application in order:
Če tožba ne vsebuje naslednjih obličnostnih zahtev, se njena vročitev odloži in se določi razumen rok za njeno dopolnitev:
indication of the applicant's address (first paragraph of Article 21 of the Statute of the Court of Justice; Article 44(1)(a) of the Rules of Procedure; point 13(a) of the Practice Directions);
navedba naslova tožeče stranke [člen 21, prvi odstavek, Statuta Sodišča; člen 44(1)(a) Poslovnika; točka 13(a) praktičnih navodil];
original signature of the lawyer or agent at the end of the application (point 7 of the Practice Directions);
izvirni podpis odvetnika ali zastopnika zadevne stranke na koncu tožbe (točka 7 praktičnih navodil);
numbered paragraphs (point 6 of the Practice Directions);
oštevilčenje odstavkov (točka 6 praktičnih navodil);
production of the annexes mentioned in the schedule (second subparagraph of Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure);
predložitev vseh prilog, navedenih v seznamu (člen 43(1), drugi pododstavek, Poslovnika);
sufficient number of copies of the annexes mentioned in the schedule (second subparagraph of Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure);
zadostno število prepisov prilog, navedenih v seznamu (člen 43(1), drugi pododstavek, Poslovnika);
production of a schedule of annexes (Article 43(4) of the Rules of Procedure and point 51 of the Practice Directions);
predloženi seznam prilog (člen 43(4) Poslovnika, točka 51 praktičnih navodil);
sufficient number of copies of the schedule (second subparagraph of Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure);
zadostno število prepisov seznama (člen 43(1) Poslovnika);
schedule of annexes with page reference and paragraph number(s) (point 51(c) of the Practice Directions);
seznam prilog z navedbo strani in odstavkov [točka 51(c) praktičnih navodil];
sufficient number of copies of the schedule of annexes with page reference and paragraph number(s) (second subparagraph of Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure);
zadostno število prepisov seznam prilog z navedbo strani in odstavkov (člen 43(1), drugi pododstavek, Poslovnika);
sufficient number of copies of the contested measure or of the documentary evidence of the date on which the institution was requested to act (second subparagraph of Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure);
zadostno število prepisov izpodbijanega akta ali listine, ki dokazuje datum poziva k ukrepanju (člen 43(1), drugi pododstavek, Poslovnika);
production of a copy of the contract containing the arbitration clause (Article 44(5a) of the Rules of Procedure);
predloženi izvod pogodbe, ki vsebuje arbitražno klavzulo (člen 44(5a) Poslovnika);
sufficient number of copies of the contract containing the arbitration clause (second subparagraph of Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure);
zadostno število prepisov izvoda pogodbe, ki vsebuje arbitražno klavzulo (člen 43(1), prvi pododstavek, Poslovnika);
pagination of the application and annexes (points 8(d) and 52 of the Practice Directions);
oštevilčenje tožbe in prilog [točki 8(d) in 52 praktičnih navodil];
sufficient number of certified copies of the application (seven for inter partes intellectual property cases and six for all other cases) (second subparagraph of Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure);
zadostno število potrjenih prepisov, ki se ujemajo z izvirnikom tožbe (sedem za zadeve s področja intelektualne lastnine inter partes in šest za vse druge zadeve) (člen 43(1), drugi pododstavek, Poslovnika);
production of certified true copies of the application (second subparagraph of Article 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure; point 9 of the Practice Directions).
predloženi prepisi, ki se ujemajo s tožbo (člen 43(1), drugi pododstavek, Poslovnika; točka 9 praktičnih navodil).
If the application does not comply with the following procedural rules, the application shall be served and a reasonable period shall be prescribed for the purposes of putting it in order:
Če tožba ne izpolnjuje naslednjih obličnostnih zahtev, je vročena, določi pa se tudi razumni rok za njeno dopolnitev:
address for service (statement of an address for service and/or agreement to service by technical means of communication) (Article 44(2) of the Rules of Procedure; Article 10(3) of the Instructions to the Registrar; points 4 and 13(d) of the Practice Directions);
sprejemanje vročitev (izbira naslova za vročanje in/ali sprejemanje vročitev s tehničnimi sredstvi sporočanja) [člen 44(2) Poslovnika; člen 10(3) navodil sodnemu tajniku, točki 4 in 13(d) praktičnih navodil];
certificate of authorisation to practise in respect of any additional lawyer (Article 44(3) of the Rules of Procedure);
potrdilo za vsakega dodatnega odvetnika, iz katerega izhaja, da je ta upravičen za zastopanje (člen 44(3) Poslovnika);
summary of the pleas in law and main arguments (point 19 of the Practice Directions);
povzetek tožbenih razlogov in bistvenih trditev (točka 19 praktičnih navodil);
translation into the language of the case accompanying any document expressed in a language other than the language of the case (second subparagraph of Article 35(3) of the Rules of Procedure).
prevod v jezik postopka, ki ga spremlja listina v drugem jeziku, kot je jezik postopka (člen 35(3), drugi pododstavek, Poslovnika).
Regularisation of lengthy applications:
Poprava obsežnih tožb:
An application comprising a number of pages which exceeds the maximum number of pages prescribed at point 10 of the Practice Directions by 40 % or more shall require regularisation, unless otherwise directed by the President.
Tožbo, katere število strani preseže za 40 % največje število strani, predpisano v točki 10 teh praktičnih navodil, je treba popraviti, razen v primerih ko predsednik odredi drugače.
An application comprising a number of pages which exceeds the maximum number of pages prescribed at point 10 of the Practice Directions by less than 40 % may require regularisation if so directed by the President.
Tožbo, katere število strani preseže za manj kot 40 % največje število strani, predpisano v točki 10 teh praktičnih navodil, je treba popraviti, če predsednik to odredi.
Where an applicant is requested to put his application in order, service on the defendant of the application which requires regularisation on account of its length shall be delayed.
Če se od tožeče stranke zahteva dopolnitev, se odloži vročitev tožbe, katere obseg upravičuje popravo, toženi stranki.
Regularisation of other pleadings
Dopolnitev drugih vlog
The instances of regularisation referred to above shall apply as necessary to pleadings other than the application.
Zgoraj navedena pravila glede dopolnitev se po potrebi uporabijo tudi za druge vloge, ki niso tožbe.
Applications for expedited procedure
Predlog za obravnavanje po hitrem postopku
An application in respect of which the expedited procedure is requested must not in principle exceed 25 pages.
Število strani tožbe, v zvezi s katero je bil podan predlog za obravnavanje po hitrem postopku, načeloma ne sme preseči 25 strani.
Such an application must be submitted in accordance with the requirements set out at points 12 to 19 above.
Tako tožbo je treba predložiti v skladu z zahtevami, navedenimi v točkah od 12 do 19 zgoraj.
An application for a case to be decided by the Court under the expedited procedure, which is made by a separate document in accordance with Article 76a of the Rules of Procedure, must contain a brief statement of the reasons for the special urgency of the case and any other relevant circumstances.
Predlog, da Sodišče prve stopnje odloči po hitrem postopku, vložen s posebno vlogo v skladu s členom 76a Poslovnika, mora vsebovati kratko obrazložitev, ki se nanaša na posebno nujnost zadeve in druge upoštevne okoliščine.
The provisions of Sections B and E above shall apply.
Uporabijo se določbe poglavij B in E zgoraj.
It is recommended that the party applying for the expedited procedure specifies in its application the pleas in law, arguments or passages of the pleading in question (application or defence) which are put forward only in the event that the case is not decided under the expedited procedure.
Priporočljivo je, da stranka, ki predlaga obravnavanje po hitrem postopku, v predlogu opredeli razloge, trditve ali odstavke zadevne vloge (tožbe ali odgovora na tožbo), ki so predstavljeni le za primer, če se ne bi odločilo po tem postopku.
That information, referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 76a(1) of the Rules of Procedure, must be clearly specified in the application, indicating the numbers of the paragraphs concerned.
Ti podatki, določeni v členu 76a(1), drugi pododstavek, Poslovnika, morajo biti v predlogu natančno opredeljeni in morajo vsebovati številke zadevnih odstavkov.
It is recommended also that an abbreviated version of the relevant pleading be annexed to any application for a case to be decided under the expedited procedure which contains the information referred to at point 63 above.
Prav tako je priporočljivo, da je predlogu za odločanje po hitrem postopku, ki vsebuje podatke iz prejšnjega odstavka, priložena skrajšana različica zadevne vloge.
Where an abbreviated version is annexed, it must comply with the following directions:
Če je priložena skrajšana različica, mora upoštevati ta navodila:
the abbreviated version shall be in the same format as the original version of the pleading in question, with omitted passages being identified by the word ‘omissis’ in square brackets;
skrajšana različica je v obliki prvotne različice zadevne vloge, katere izpuščeni odstavki se lahko razberejo iz oglatih oklepajev, v katerih je omemba „izpuščeno“;
paragraphs which are retained in the abbreviated version shall keep the same numbering as in the original version of the pleading in question;
ohranjeni odstavki v skrajšani različici so enako oštevilčeni kot prvotna različica zadevne vloge;
if the abbreviated version does not refer to all of the annexes to the original version of the pleading in question, the schedule of annexes accompanying the abbreviated version shall identify each annex omitted by the word ‘omissis’;
seznam prilog, ki je priložen k skrajšani različici, vsebuje, če skrajšana različica ne napotuje na vse priloge prvotne različice zadevne vloge, omembo „izpuščeno“ za opredelitev vsake od izpuščenih prilog;
annexes which are retained in the abbreviated version must keep the same numbering as in the schedule of annexes in the original version of the pleading in question;
priloge, ki so ohranjene v skrajšani različici, morajo biti oštevilčene enako kot seznam prilog prvotne različice zadevne vloge;
the annexes referred to in the schedule accompanying the abbreviated version must be attached to that version.
priloge, navedene v seznamu k skrajšani različici, morajo biti priložene k tej različici.
In order to ensure that it is dealt with as expeditiously as possible, the abbreviated version must comply with the above directions.
Da bi jo lahko kar najhitreje obravnavali, morajo biti v skrajšani različici upoštevana zgornja navodila.
Where the production of an abbreviated version of the pleading is requested by the Court under Article 76a(4) of the Rules of Procedure, the abbreviated version must be prepared in accordance with the above directions, unless otherwise specified.
Če Sodišče prve stopnje zahteva, da se predloži skrajšana različica vloge na podlagi člena 76a(4) Poslovnika, mora biti skrajšana različica sestavljena v skladu z zgornjimi navodili, razen če ni določeno drugače.
If the applicant has not specified in its application for expedited procedure the pleas in law, arguments or passages of the application which are to be taken into consideration only in the event that the case is not decided under the expedited procedure, the defendant must respond to the application initiating proceedings within a period of one month.
Če tožeča stranka v svojem predlogu ni navedla razlogov, trditev ali odstavkov svoje vloge, ki naj se jih upošteva le v primeru, če ne bi bilo odločeno po hitrem postopku, mora tožena stranka odgovoriti na tožbo v roku enega meseca.
If the applicant has specified in its application for expedited procedure the pleas in law, arguments or passages of the application which are to be taken into consideration only in the event that the case is not decided under the expedited procedure, the defendant must respond, within a period of one month, to the pleas in law and arguments advanced in the application, in the light of the information provided in the application for the expedited procedure.
Če je tožeča stranka v svojem predlogu navedla razloge, trditve ali odstavke iz svoje tožbe, ki naj se jih upošteva le v primeru, če ne bi bilo odločeno po hitrem postopku, mora tožena stranka odgovoriti v roku enega meseca na razloge in trditve iz tožbe, ob upoštevanju navedb, predloženih v predlogu za obravnavanje po hitrem postopku.
If the applicant has attached an abbreviated version of the application to its application for expedited procedure, the defendant must respond, within a period of one month, to the pleas in law and arguments contained in that abbreviated version of the application.
Če je tožeča stranka svojemu predlogu priložila skrajšano različico tožbe, mora tožena stranka v roku enega meseca odgovoriti na razloge in trditve iz skrajšane različice tožbe.
If the Court decides to reject the application for an expedited procedure before the defendant has lodged its defence, the period of one month for lodgment of the defence prescribed under the first subparagraph of Article 76a(2) of the Rules of Procedure shall be extended by a further month.
Če Sodišče prve stopnje zavrne predlog za obravnavanje po hitrem postopku, še preden je tožena stranka vložila odgovor na tožbo, se rok za vložitev tega odgovora, predviden v členu 76a(2), prvi pododstavek, Poslovnika, podaljša za dodaten mesec.
If the Court decides to reject the application for an expedited procedure after the defendant has lodged its defence within the period of one month prescribed by the first subparagraph of Article 76a(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the defendant shall be allowed a further period of one month in order to supplement his defence.
Če Sodišče prve stopnje zavrne predlog za obravnavanje po hitrem postopku, potem ko je tožena stranka vložila odgovor na tožbo v roku enega meseca, določenem v členu 76a, drugi pododstavek, Poslovnika, se stranki odobri nov rok enega meseca, da se ji omogoči dopolnitev odgovora na tožbo.
Applications for suspension of operation or enforcement and other interim measures
Predlog za odlog in druge začasne odredbe
The application must be made by a separate document.
Predlog je treba vložiti s posebno vlogo.
It must be intelligible in itself, without necessitating reference to the application lodged in the main proceedings.
Predlog mora biti sam po sebi razumljiv, ne da bi bilo treba vpogledati v tožbo v postopku v glavni stvari.
An application for suspension of operation or enforcement or for other interim measures must state, with the utmost concision, the subject-matter of the proceedings, the pleas of fact and of law on which the main action is based (establishing a prima facie case on the merits in that action) and the circumstances giving rise to urgency.
V predlogu za odlog izvršitve ali glede drugih začasnih ukrepov je treba zelo na kratko in zgoščeno navesti predmet spora, dejanske in pravne razloge, na katerih temelji tožba v postopku v glavni stvari in ki na prvi pogled izkazujejo utemeljenost (fumus boni juris), ter okoliščine, ki predstavljajo nujnost.
It must specify the measure(s) applied for.
V njej mora(-jo) biti zelo natančno naveden(-i) predlagani ukrep(-i).
Sections B, D and E above shall apply.
Uporabijo se določbe poglavij B, D in E zgoraj.
Because an application for interim measures requires the existence of a prima facie case to be assessed for the purposes of a summary procedure, it must not set out in full the text of the application in the main proceedings.
Predlog za izdajo začasne odredbe, katerega namen je omogočiti presojo fumus boni juris v okviru skrajšanega postopka, ne sme v celoti povzemati besedila tožbe v postopku v glavni stvari.
In order that an application for interim measures may be dealt with urgently, the number of pages it contains must not in principle (depending on the subject-matter and the circumstances of the case) exceed a maximum of 25 pages.
Za nujno obravnavanje predloga je 25 strani največje število strani, ki se ga glede na zadevno vsebino in okoliščine zadeve načeloma ne sme preseči.
I. Applications for confidential treatment
I. Predlog za zaupno obravnavanje
Without prejudice to the provisions of the second and third subparagraphs of Article 67(3) of the Rules of Procedure, the Court shall take into consideration only those documents which have been made available to the lawyers and agents of the parties and on which they have been given an opportunity of expressing their views (first subparagraph of Article 67(3) of the Rules of Procedure).
Sodišče prve stopnje brez poseganja v določbe člena 67(3), drugi in tretji pododstavek, Poslovnika upošteva samo tiste listine in dokaze, ki so bili dani na vpogled odvetnikom in zastopnikom strank in o katerih so ti lahko izrazili svoje stališče (člen 67(3), prvi pododstavek, Poslovnika).
Nevertheless, a party may apply for any part of the contents of the case-file which are secret or confidential:
Vendar lahko stranka zahteva, da se določeni deli oziroma določeni elementi vloge, ki so tajni ali zaupni:
to be excluded from the documents to be furnished to an intervener (Article 116(2) of the Rules of Procedure);
intervenientu ne posredujejo (člen 116(2) Poslovnika),
not to be made available to a party in a joined case (Article 50(2) of the Rules of Procedure).
izločijo iz vpogleda strankam v združenih zadevah (člen 50(2) Poslovnika).
Applications for leave to intervene
V primeru predlogov za intervencijo
An application by one of the parties pursuant to Article 116(2) of the Rules of Procedure for the exclusion on grounds of secrecy or confidentiality of any part of the contents of the case-file from the documents to be furnished to an intervener shall be made by a separate document.
Predlog stranke, da se v skladu s členom 116(2) Poslovnika določeni deli ali določeni elementi vloge ne posredujejo intervenientu, ker so tajni ali zaupni, je treba vložiti ločeno.
Such an application must be limited to what is strictly necessary.
Tak predlog za zaupno obravnavanje je treba omejiti na najnujnejše.
It may not in any event cover the entirety of a pleading and may only exceptionally extend to the entirety of an annexed document.
V nobenem primeru se ne sme nanašati na celotno vlogo in le izjemoma na vse priloge vloge.
It should usually be feasible to furnish a non-confidential version of a document in which passages, words or figures have been deleted without harming the interest sought to be protected.
Običajno je mogoče posredovati različice vloge, v kateri ni zaupnih podatkov in v kateri so odstranjeni določeni odstavki, besede ali številke, ne da bi škodovali zadevnim interesom.
An application which is insufficiently detailed will not be considered.
Predloga, ki ni dovolj natančen, ni mogoče upoštevati.
An application must accurately identify the particulars or passages to be excluded and briefly state the reasons for which each of those particulars or passages is regarded as secret or confidential.
V predlogu za zaupno obravnavanje morajo biti natančno navedeni zadevni elementi ali odstavki, vsebovati pa mora zelo kratko obrazložitev tajnega ali zaupnega značaja vsakega od elementov ali odstavkov.
The application must be accompanied by a non-confidential version of each pleading or document concerned with the confidential material deleted.
Priloga predloga za zaupno obravnavanje mora vsebovati različico vloge, v kateri ni zaupnih podatkov, oziroma zadevno listino, iz katere so izločeni elementi ali odlomki, na katere se predlog sklicuje.
Joined cases
V primeru združenih zadev
An application by one of the parties pursuant to Article 50(2) of the Rules of Procedure for any part of the contents of the case-file not to be made available to a party in a joined case on grounds of secrecy or confidentiality shall be made by a separate document.
Predlog stranke v zadevi, naj se v skladu s členom 50(2) Poslovnika določeni deli ali določeni elementi spisa ne dajo na vpogled stranki v združenih zadevah, ker so tajni ali zaupni, je treba vložiti z ločeno vlogo.
Points 75 to 77 of the Practice Directions shall apply mutatis mutandis to applications for confidential treatment submitted in joined cases.
Točke od 75 do 77 teh praktičnih navodil se uporabijo mutatis mutandis za predlog za zaupno obravnavanje, podan v združenih zadevah.
Applications for leave to lodge a reply in appeal proceedings
Predlog za odobritev replike v postopku s pritožbo