natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, Article 13, second paragraph of that Regulation foresees that in duly justified exceptional cases, for measures and programmes covered by Decision 90/424/EEC, expenditure relating to administrative and personnel costs incurred by Member States and beneficiaries of aid from the EAGF shall be borne by the Fund.
Nadalje je v drugem odstavku člena 13 navedene uredbe določeno, da v ustrezno utemeljenih izjemnih primerih za ukrepe in programe, ki jih zajema Odločba Sveta 90/424/EGS o odhodkih na področju veterine, stroške administracije in osebja, ki jih plačujejo države članice in upravičenci pomoči iz EKJS, krije Sklad.
For financial control purposes, Articles 9, 36 and 37 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 are to apply.
Za finančni nadzor se uporabljajo členi 9, 36 in 37 Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005.
A Community financial contribution shall be granted for the following activities of the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Ispra, Italy (the laboratory), carried out pursuant to Article 32(1) of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004, and for the organisation of workshops concerning such activities, for the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2009:
Finančni prispevek Skupnosti se dodeli za naslednje dejavnosti Skupnega raziskovalnega središča Evropske komisije v Ispri (Italija, „laboratorij“), ki se izvajajo v skladu s členom 32(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 882/2004, ter za organizacijo delavnic v zvezi s temi dejavnostmi, za obdobje od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2009:
the activities related to material in contact with foodstuffs; this contribution shall not exceed EUR 180003;
dejavnosti, povezane s snovmi, ki so v stiku z živili; ta prispevek ne sme preseči 180003 EUR;
the organisation of the workshops by that laboratory, concerning the activities referred to in point 1; this contribution shall not exceed EUR 75947;
organizacija delavnic v okviru navedenega laboratorija v zvezi z dejavnostmi iz točke 1; ta prispevek ne sme preseči 75947 EUR;
the activities related to GMOs; this contribution shall not exceed EUR 13388;
dejavnosti, povezane z gensko spremenjenimi organizmi; ta prispevek ne sme preseči 13388 EUR;
the organisation of the workshops by that laboratory, concerning the activities referred to in point 3; this contribution shall not exceed EUR 61440.
organizacija delavnic v okviru navedenega laboratorija v zvezi z dejavnostmi iz točke 3; ta prispevek ne sme preseči 61440 EUR.
A Community financial contribution shall be granted for the following activities of the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Geel, Belgium (the laboratory) carried out pursuant to Article 32(1) of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004, and for the organisation of workshops concerning such activities, for the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2009:
Finančni prispevek Skupnosti se dodeli za naslednje dejavnosti Skupnega raziskovalnega središča Evropske komisije v Geelu (Belgija, „laboratorij“), ki se izvajajo v skladu s členom 32(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 882/2004, ter za organizacijo delavnic v zvezi s temi dejavnostmi, za obdobje od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2009:
the activities related to heavy metals in feed and food; this contribution shall not exceed EUR 250000;
dejavnosti, povezane s težkimi kovinami v krmi in živilih; ta prispevek ne sme preseči 250000 EUR;
the organisation of the workshops by that laboratory, concerning the activities referred to in point 1; this contribution shall not exceed EUR 25000;
organizacija delavnic v okviru navedenega laboratorija v zvezi z dejavnostmi iz točke 1; ta prispevek ne sme preseči 25000 EUR;
the activities related to mycotoxins; this contribution shall not exceed EUR 230000;
dejavnosti, povezane z mikotoksini; ta prispevek ne sme preseči 230000 EUR;
the organisation of the workshops by that laboratory, concerning the activities referred to in point 3; this contribution shall not exceed EUR 22000;
organizacija delavnic v okviru navedenega laboratorija v zvezi z dejavnostmi iz točke 3; ta prispevek ne sme preseči 22000 EUR;
the activities related to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH); this contribution shall not exceed EUR 232000;
dejavnosti, povezane s policikličnimi aromatskimi ogljikovodiki; ta prispevek ne sme preseči 232000 EUR;
the organisation of the workshops by that laboratory, concerning the activities referred to in point 5; this contribution shall not exceed EUR 22000.
organizacija delavnic v okviru navedenega laboratorija v zvezi z dejavnostmi iz točke 5; ta prispevek ne sme preseči 22000 EUR.
The Community’s financial contributions provided for in Articles 1 and 2 shall be at the rate of 100 % of eligible costs as defined in Regulation (EC) No 1754/2006.
Finančni prispevki Skupnosti iz členov 1 in 2 znašajo 100 % upravičenih stroškov, opredeljenih v Uredbi (ES) št. 1754/2006.
for food contact materials: Joint Research Centre, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, Physical and Chemical Exposures Unit, TP 260, Via E. Fermi, 1, 21020 Ispra (Italy)
za snovi, ki so v stiku z živili: Skupno raziskovalno središče, Inštitut za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov, Oddelek za fizično in kemično izpostavljenost, TP 260, Via E. Fermi 1, 21020 Ispra (Italija)
for genetically modified organisms: Joint Research Centre, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, Biotechnology and GMOs Unit, Via E. Fermi, 1, 21020 Ispra (Italy)
za gensko spremenjene organizme: Skupno raziskovalno središče, Inštitut za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov, Oddelek za biotehnologijo in gensko spremenjene organizme, Via E. Fermi 1, 21020 Ispra (Italija)
for heavy metals: Joint Research Centre, Retieseweg 111, 2440 Geel (Belgium)
za težke kovine: Skupno raziskovalno središče, Retieseweg 111, 2440 Geel (Belgija)
for mycotoxins: Joint Research Centre, Retieseweg 111, 2440 Geel (Belgium)
za mikotoksine: Skupno raziskovalno središče, Retieseweg 111, 2440 Geel (Belgija)
for PAHs: Joint Research Centre, Retieseweg 111, 2440 Geel (Belgium)
za policiklične aromatske ogljikovodike: Skupno raziskovalno središče, Retieseweg 111, 2440 Geel (Belgija)
concerning aid granted by France to the Fund for the prevention of risks to fishing and fisheries undertakings (State aid C 9/06)
o pomočeh, ki jih je Francija dodelila Skladu za preprečevanje tveganj ribištva (FPAP) in ribiškim podjetjem (Državna pomoč C 9/06)
(notified under document number C(2007) 5636)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 5636)
Having called on the parties concerned to submit their comments under that Article,
po pozivu zainteresiranim strankam, da predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenim členom,
The Commission was aware of information relating to the existence of a fund intended to compensate for the rise in the price of fuel affecting French fisheries undertakings since 2004.
Komisija je bila seznanjena z različnimi informacijami o obstoju sklada za nadomestilo zvišane cene goriva, ki so jo francoska ribiška podjetja plačevala od leta 2004.
According to that information, the declared objective of the fund, called the Fund for the prevention of risks to fishing (FPAP), was to even out short-term variations in the price of fuel for the fishing industry, but in practice it enabled the undertakings to benefit from a fuel price much lower than the market price.
Po teh informacijah je bil napovedani cilj tega sklada, imenovanega Sklad za preprečevanje tveganj ribištva (FPAP), izenačiti kratkoročna nihanja cene goriva v ribištvu, vendar pa je v praksi povzročil, da so ta podjetja uživala ugodnost precej nižje cene goriva od tržne.
Apparently it was planned, at the beginning, for the Fund to operate solely on the basis of contributions from the trade.
Na začetku je bilo očitno predvideno, da naj bi ta sklad deloval samo na podlagi prispevkov izvajalcev v ribiškem sektorju.
The operating principle would have been simple: the Fund would have borne that part of the cost of fuel higher than a specified reference price per litre and, in return, the undertakings would have paid contributions to the FPAP when the price of fuel fell back to below the reference price.
Načelo delovanja naj bi bilo preprosto: sklad bi pokrival del stroškov goriva nad referenčno ceno, določeno za liter, podjetja pa bi s svoje strani vplačala prispevke v FPAP, kadar bi cena goriva ponovno padla pod referenčno ceno.
In this way, a balance for financing the system would have been struck without there being any contribution from public funds.
Tako bi se vzpostavilo ravnotežje za financiranje sistema brez prispevka iz javnih sredstev.
However, since the market price for fuel always stayed very considerably above the reference price, the Commission took the view that operation of the FPAP was only possible as a result of the financial contribution from the State and that that financial contribution constituted State aid within the meaning of Article 87 of the EC Treaty.
Ker pa je bila tržna cena goriva vedno precej nad referenčno ceno, je Komisija domnevala, da je FPAP lahko deloval le zaradi denarnih sredstev države; ta sredstva predstavljajo državno pomoč v smislu člena 87 Pogodbe ES.
On 25 August 2005 the Commission requested France to inform it, by 5 September 2005, whether specific measures had been adopted or were envisaged by the State to counter the increase in fuel costs.
Komisija je 25. avgusta 2005 prosila Francijo, naj ji do 5. septembra 2005 sporoči, ali je država sprejela oziroma namerava sprejeti posebne ukrepe za spopad s povečanjem stroškov goriva.
The Commission also pointed out that if such measures involved State aid it had to be notified of them under Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
Poleg tega je Komisija opozorila, da če je šlo pri teh ukrepih za državne pomoči, bi morala biti o njih obveščena v skladu s členom 88(3) Pogodbe.
In the absence of a reply, and in accordance with Article 10 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 (now Article 88) of the EC Treaty [1], on 21 September 2005 the Commission requested France to provide it, within three weeks, with information on the Fund in order for it to be able to examine whether it actually involved State aid and, if so, whether or not that State aid was compatible with the common market.
Ker odgovora ni dobila, je v skladu s členom 10 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 (sedaj člen 88) Pogodbe ES [1] Komisija Francijo 21. septembra 2005 zaprosila, naj ji v treh tednih predloži informacije o tem skladu, da bi lahko preučila, ali gre dejansko za državno pomoč, in če je tako, ali je ta državna pomoč združljiva s skupnim trgom ali ne.
No mentioned was made in that correspondence of the advance payments granted by the State.
V tem dopisu niso bila navedena gotovinska predplačila, ki jih je odobrila država.
On the contrary, it was implicit from the French authorities’ reply that the financing of the Fund, managed by the trade, was based exclusively on the pooling of the members’ financial capacity.
Nasprotno pa je iz odgovora francoskih organov smiselno izhajalo, da je financiranje sklada, ki ga upravljajo izvajalci ribiškega sektorja, temeljilo izključno na vzajemnosti finančne sposobnosti njegovih članov.
On 21 October 2005 the Commission reminded the French authorities of its formal request for information on the FPAP of 21 September 2005, granting them a new two-week deadline.
Komisija je 21. oktobra 2005 francoske organe opozorila na svojo uradno zahtevo za informacije o FPAP dne 21. septembra 2005 in jim za odgovor odobrila nov dvotedenski rok.
In the absence of a reply from France within the time limit set, the Commission decided, in accordance with paragraph 3 of Article 10 as referred to above, to issue France with an injunction to provide the information necessary for the examination.
Ker Francija v predpisanem roku ni odgovorila, je Komisija v skladu z zgoraj navedenim členom 10(3) sklenila, da Franciji izda odredbo za predložitev vseh informacij, potrebnih za to preiskavo.
That injunction, dated 5 December 2005, was sent on 6 December 2005 with a three-week deadline for reply.
O odredbi z dne 5. decembra 2005 je bila Francija uradno obveščena 6. decembra 2005, rok za odgovor pa je bil tri tedne.
France replied by letter dated 21 December 2005 and received by the Commission on 27 December 2005.
Francija je odgovorila z dopisom z dne 21. decembra 2005, ki ga je Komisija prejela 27. decembra 2005.
That letter referred back to a previous reply, dated 6 December and received on 8 December, sent in reply to the Commission’s letter of 21 September 2005 (see recital 5 of this Decision).
Dopis se sklicuje na prejšnji odgovor, datiran s 6. decembrom in prejet 8. decembra, ki je odgovor na dopis Komisije z dne 21. septembra 2005 (glej uvodno izjavo 5 te odločbe).
In those two letters France forwarded the Commission the FPAP’s articles of association and the three agreements on the introduction of a repayable State advance to the FPAP.
V teh dopisih je Francija Komisiji poslala statut FPAP in tri sporazume v zvezi z vračljivim predplačilom s strani države v dobro FPAP.
After examining these replies and the documents enclosed, on 8 March 2006 the Commission informed France of its decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure provided for in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty and Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999.
Ko je Komisija preučila te odgovore in priložene dokumente, je 8. marca 2006 obvestila Francijo o svoji odločitvi, da začne formalni postopek preiskave na podlagi člena 88(2) Pogodbe ES in člena 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999.
The Commission decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union of 19 April 2006 [2].
Odločba Komisije o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije z dne 19 aprila 2006 [2].
The Commission called on interested parties to submit their comments on the measures in question within one month.
Komisija je zainteresirane stranke pozvala, da predložijo svoje pripombe o zadevnih ukrepih v roku enega meseca.
France submitted its comments on 21 April 2006 in the form of a note from its authorities.
Francija je o svojih pripombah Komisijo seznanila z dopisom z dne 21. aprila 2006.
That note is accompanied by a list of defensive points which seems to have been originally intended for internal use; the list explains the position to be taken vis-à-vis the Commission’s arguments.
Obvestilu je priložena utemeljitev, za katero se zdi, da je bila prvotno namenjena interni uporabi; ta utemeljitev pojasnjuje stališče, ki ga je treba zavzeti do argumentov Komisije.
On 17 May 2006 Ménard, Quimbert et associés, a law firm in Nantes (‘MQA’ in the following) sent a fax indicating their intention to make comments on behalf of the FPAP at a later date, and accordingly requested that they be granted time to do so.
Odvetniška pisarna iz Nantesa Ménard, Quimbert in družabniki (v nadaljnjem besedilu „MQA“) je 17. maja 2006 v telefaksu izrazila svojo namero, da bo pozneje predložila svoje pripombe v imenu FPAP, in zaprosila za odobritev podaljšanja roka.
The Commission accepted an extension of two weeks.
Komisija je odobrila podaljšanje roka za dva tedna.
MQA then forwarded, by ordinary post dated 17 May received by the Commission on 23 May, a statement under the letterhead of Coopération Maritime signed by Mr de Feuardent, the Secretary-General of the FPAP, dated 18 May.
Iz odvetniške pisarne MQA so nato z običajno pošto poslali dopis, datiran s 17. majem, ki ga je Komisija prejela 23. maja, z glavo Coopération Maritime (Zveza za pomorsko sodelovanje) ter podpisom generalnega sekretarja FPAP g. de Feuardenta in datumom 18. maja.
A third letter from MQA, also dated 17 May and received by the Commission on 14 June, was ‘a new version of [its] comments following correction of a number of clerical errors’. In reality these were documents not previously forwarded to the Commission comprising additional comments to the statement by Mr de Feuardent referred to above, accompanied by a number of documents relating to the operation of the FPAP (articles of association, rules of procedure, information notes, tax treatment of contributions, and a letter relating to a joint audit by the Inspectorate-General for Finance and the Inspectorate-General for Agriculture and Fisheries).
Tretji dopis odvetniške pisarne MQA z istim datumom, 17. maja, ki ga je Komisija prejela 14. junija, je vseboval „novo različico (njihovih) pripomb s popravki nekaterih očitnih napak“; dejansko je šlo za dokumente, ki še niso bili poslani Komisiji, z dodatnimi pripombami k zgoraj navedenemu dopisu g. de Feuardenta, s priloženim nizom dokumentov o delovanju FPAP (statut, navodila za uporabo, obvestila, davčno obravnavanje prispevkov, skupno pismo o nameri Generalnega inšpektorata za finance in Generalnega inšpektorata za kmetijstvo in ribištvo).
Finally, the last letter from MQA, dated 12 June 2006 and sent to the Commission the same day by fax, following on from its letter of 19 May ‘dated 17 May by mistake, sending [you] the comments made by Mr de Feuardent, Secretary-General of the Confédération de la Coopération, de la Mutualité et du Crédit Maritime, dated 18 May 2006’ contained the same additional comments as those sent by the third letter of 17 May, but without the accompanying documents.
Zadnji dopis odvetniške pisarne MQA z dne 12. junija 2006, poslan Komisiji istega dne po telefaksu, ki je nadaljevanje njihovega dopisa z dne 19. maja „ki je bil pomotoma datiran s 17. majem in [vam] posreduje pripombe g. de Feuardenta, generalnega sekretarja Confédération de la Coopération, de la Mutualité et du Crédit Maritime, datiranimi z 18. majem 2006“, je vseboval enake dodatne pripombe, kot so pripombe, poslane s tretjim dopisom z dne 17. maja, le brez prilog.
On 14 June 2006 the Commission sent France the third letter from MQA of 17 May 2006 (the version announced as correcting the clerical errors) and MQA’s last letter of 12 June 2006, requesting France to send its comments to reach it within one month.
Komisija je 14. junija 2006 Franciji poslala tretji dopis z dne 17. maja 2006 odvetniške pisarne MQA (različica, ki je označena s popravki očitnih napak) in zadnji dopis te pisarne z dne 12. junija 2006 ter zahtevala, da ji Francija pošlje svoje pripombe v roku enega meseca.
On 12 July 2006 France requested an extension of the deadline to 1 September.
Francija je 12. julija 2006 zaprosila za podaljšanje roka do 1. septembra.
On 18 July 2006 the Commission accepted an additional period of one month.
Komisija je 18. julija 2006 sprejela podaljšanje roka za en mesec.
On 26 September 2006 France replied that it had no particular comments to make, but pointed out that the MQA letter of 17/19 May 2006 did not tally with Mr de Feuardent’s comments.
Francija je 26. septembra 2006 odgovorila, da nima nobene posebne pripombe, je pa opozorila, da dopis odvetniške pisarne MQA z dne 17./19. maja 2006 ni skladen s pripombami g. de Feuardenta.
On 9 October 2006 the Commission gave France details of the correspondence received from MQA and requested it to confirm within ten days that the French authorities had indeed been aware of Mr de Feuardent’s statement.
Komisija je 9. oktobra 2006 Franciji poslala podrobnosti dopisov, prejetih od odvetniške pisarne MQA, in jo prosila, da v desetih dneh potrdi, ali so bili francoski organi seznanjeni z dopisom g. de Feuardenta.
France replied on 23 October 2006 that it did not have the statement, which it had in fact only mentioned previously because the letter (from MQA) dated 12 June mentioned it.
Francija je odgovorila 23. oktobra 2006, da nima tega dopisa, ki ga je prej omenila samo zato, ker je bilo navedeno v dopisu (pisarne MQA) z dne 12. junija.
Since France stated that it had not received that letter, the Commission officially sent it a copy on 27 October 2006, requesting any comments that France had to be sent to it by 15 November.
Ker je torej Francija izjavila, da ni prejela tega dopisa, ji ga je Komisija uradno posredovala 27. oktobra 2006 in jo prosila, naj ji morebitne pripombe pošlje najpozneje do 15. novembra.
On 27 November 2006 France informed the Commission that it did not have any particular comments to make on the document.
Francija je 27. novembra 2006 obvestila Komisijo, da nima posebnih pripomb na ta dokument.
Presentation of the FPAP and its activities
Predstavitev FPAP in njegovih dejavnosti
In accordance with the French act of 21 March 1884, as amended by the act of 12 March 1920, the FPAP is constituted in the form of a trade association.
FPAP je bil v skladu s francoskim zakonom z dne 21. marca 1884, spremenjenim z zakonom z dne 12. marca 1920, ustanovljen kot strokovno združenje.
The draft articles of association were approved by the constituent assembly held on 10 February 2004 and the articles of association themselves are dated 9 April 2004.
Osnutek statuta je bil odobren na ustanovitveni seji 10. februarja 2004, statut pa je datiran z 9. aprilom 2004.
According to the articles of association (Article 4), the association has been set up for a period of 99 years.
V skladu s statutom (člen 4) je to združenje ustanovljeno za 99 let.
Its seat is in Paris at: 24, rue du Rocher, i.e. the same address as the Confédération de la Coopération, de la Mutualité et du Crédit Maritime (‘Coopération Maritime’ in the following).
Sedež ima v Parizu, 24, rue du Rocher, na istem naslovu kot Confédération de la coopération, de la mutualité et du crédit maritimes (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Zveza za pomorsko sodelovanje“).
Under Article 7, the founding members are the Coopération Maritime, the central contracting and development agency Cecomer, the retail traders’ cooperative society, which is in fact the central contracting agency of the maritime cooperatives whose function is, in particular, to supply equipment and operating material for fisheries undertakings, the Small-Scale Fishery Management Centre, and two persons active in the fishing industry.
V skladu s členom 7 so ustanovni člani Zveza za pomorsko sodelovanje, skupna služba za nabavo in razvoj CECOMER, zadruga trgovcev na drobno, ki je dejansko skupna nabavna služba ribiških zadrug, katerih naloga je predvsem oskrba z opremo in proizvodi za delovanje ribiških podjetij, Center za upravljanje malega priobalnega morskega ribolova in dve znani osebnosti iz sveta ribištva.
At the constituent assembly on 10 February 2004 these five founding members were appointed administrators of the FPAP until the ordinary general meeting to be held in 2007.
Na ustanovni seji 10. februarja 2004 je bilo teh pet ustanovnih članov imenovanih za upravitelje FPAP do redne generalne skupščine, ki bi morala biti v letu 2007.
Thus the FPAP appears to have been set up by the fisheries sector and organisations commercially involved in it (maritime cooperatives, central contracting agency and fisheries undertaking management centres).
Tako se zdi, da FPAP izhaja iz ribiškega sektorja in organizacij, ki so z njim gospodarsko povezane (ribiške zadruge, skupna nabavna služba, centri za upravljanje ribiških podjetij).
Applicants for membership must provide proof that they are active in the fishing industry. However, the association may take in ‘any other person willing to give their moral support to the association’, provided that the number of employees of this category of member does not exceed 5 % of the number of the association’s members.
Kandidati za člane morajo predložiti dokazila, da njihova dejavnost vključuje ribištvo; vendar pa lahko združenje sprejme „vsako drugo osebo, ki je pripravljena združenje moralno podpreti“, pod pogojem da število takih članov ne presega 5 % števila članov združenja.
In its letter of 6 December 2005 France points out that the FPAP has 2013 members and 2385 vessels, accounting for 30 % of the French fleet.
V pismu z dne 6. decembra 2005 Francija pojasni, da FPAP šteje 2013 članov in 2385 plovil, kar je 30 % francoskega ladjevja.