natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission considers that the measure constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty for the following reasons, already indicated in the opening decision.
Komisija meni, da ukrep pomeni državno pomoč po členu 87(1) Pogodbe ES zaradi naslednjih razlogov, ki so že bili navedeni v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka.
Presence of state resources
Uporaba državnih virov
State resources are involved since an exemption from the payment of corporate income tax is planned.
Vključeni so državni viri, saj je načrtovana oprostitev plačila davka od dobička pravnih oseb.
The measure would relieve the beneficiary of the aid from costs which it would have had to bear under normal market conditions.
Ukrep bi upravičenca do pomoči razbremenil stroškov, ki bi jih sicer imel v normalnih tržnih pogojih.
It would therefore provide an advantage to Glunz&Jensen s.r.o. over other companies.
Zato bi pomenil prednost družbe Glunz&Jensen s.r.o. pred drugimi družbami.
Presence of selectivity
Selektivnost
The measure is selective since it relates to only one undertaking.
Ukrep je selektiven, saj se nanaša na eno samo podjetje.
Distortion of competition and trade
Izkrivljanje konkurence in trgovine
The measure affects trade between Member States since (i) the beneficiary is active in a sector where strong intra-Community trade exists and (ii) the relocation of activities from Denmark and the UK has a strong effect on sectoral trade flows.
Ukrep vpliva na trgovino med državami članicami, ker (i) je upravičenec dejaven v panogi, kjer obstaja močna trgovina znotraj Skupnosti, in ker (ii) premestitev dejavnosti iz Danske in Združenega kraljestva močno vpliva na trgovinske tokove v panogi.
Insofar as the measure constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty, its compatibility must be assessed in the light of the exceptions provided for in Article 87(2) and (3) of the EC Treaty.
Če ukrep pomeni državno pomoč po členu 87(1) Pogodbe ES, je treba njegovo združljivost oceniti glede na izjeme iz člena 87(2) in (3) Pogodbe ES.
The exceptions provided for in Article 87(2) of the EC Treaty, which concern aid of a social character granted to individual consumers, aid to make good the damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences and aid granted to certain areas of the Federal Republic of Germany, do not apply in this case.
Izjeme iz člena 87(2) Pogodbe ES, ki zadevajo pomoč socialnega značaja, dodeljeno posameznim potrošnikom, pomoč za povrnitev škode, ki so jo povzročile naravne nesreče ali izjemni dogodki, in pomoč, dodeljeno nekaterim območjem Zvezne republike Nemčije, v tem primeru ne veljajo.
The measure cannot be considered an important project of common European interest or a measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the Slovak economy, as provided for by Article 87(3)(b) of the EC Treaty.
Ukrepa ni mogoče obravnavati kot pomembnega projekta skupnega evropskega interesa ali ukrepa za odpravljanje resne motnje v gospodarstvu Slovaške, kot je opredeljeno v členu 87(3)(b) Pogodbe ES.
Nor does the measure qualify for the exception allowed by Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty, which provides for the authorisation of aid to facilitate the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic areas if the aid does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Ukrep tudi ne izpolnjuje pogojev za izvzetje, dopuščeno v členu 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES, ki določa odobritev pomoči za pospeševanje razvoja določenih gospodarskih dejavnosti ali določenih gospodarskih območij, kadar taka pomoč ne vpliva škodljivo na trgovinske pogoje v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
In the same way, it does not have as its objective the promotion of culture and heritage conservation as provided for by Article 87(3)(d) of the EC Treaty.
Prav tako ukrep ni namenjen spodbujanju kulture in ohranjanju kulturne dediščine, kot je določeno v členu 87(3)(d) Pogodbe ES.
Article 87(3)(a) of the EC Treaty provides for the authorisation of aid to promote the economic development of areas where the standard of living is abnormally low or where there is serious underemployment.
Člen 87(3)(a) Pogodbe ES predvideva odobritev pomoči za pospeševanje gospodarskega razvoja območij, kjer je življenjska raven izjemno nizka ali kjer je podzaposlenost velika.
The Prešov region (eastern Slovakia) is an eligible region under that derogation.
Prešovski okraj (vzhodna Slovaška) je regija, ki izpolnjuje pogoje v skladu s tem odstopanjem.
In its decision to open the formal investigation procedure, the Commission explained the reasons, summarised in Part III of this Decision, for which it doubted that the measure could qualify for the derogation under Article 87(3)(a) of the EC Treaty.
V svoji odločitvi o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave je Komisija razložila razloge, povzete v delu III te odločbe, zaradi katerih je dvomila, da bi ukrep lahko izpolnil pogoje za odstopanje po členu 87(3)(a) Pogodbe ES.
In the absence of any comments from the Slovak Republic or third parties, the Commission can only find that these doubts are confirmed.
Ker Slovaška in tretje stranke niso predložile nobenih pripomb, lahko Komisija ugotovi le, da so ti dvomi potrjeni.
The Commission finds that the measure notified by the Slovak Republic, as set out under paragraphs 6 to 9 above, is not compatible with the common market under any derogation laid down in the EC Treaty and must be prohibited.
Komisija ugotavlja, da ukrep, ki ga je priglasila Slovaška, kot je podrobneje razložen v odstavkih 6 do 9 zgoraj, ni združljiv s skupnim trgom po nobenem od odstopanj, opredeljenih v Pogodbi ES, in ga je treba prepovedati.
According to the Slovak authorities, the aid has not been granted, and therefore there is no need for it to be recovered,
Po trditvah slovaških organov pomoč ni bila dodeljena, zato je ni treba povrniti –
The notified tax exemption constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Priglašena davčna oprostitev pomeni državno pomoč po členu 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
The State aid which the Slovak Republic is planning to implement for Glunz&Jensen s.r.o., amounting to SKK 42 million (EUR 1,15 million), is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč, ki jo Slovaška namerava dodeliti družbi Glunz&Jensen s.r.o. v znesku 42 milijonov SKK (1,15 milijona EUR), je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
The aid may therefore not be implemented.
Zato se pomoč ne sme dodeliti.
The Slovak Republic shall inform the Commission, within two months of notification of this Decision, of the measures taken to comply with it.
Slovaška v dveh mesecih po obvestilu o tej odločbi obvesti Komisijo o sprejetih ukrepih za izpolnitev te odločbe.
This Decision is addressed to the Slovak Republic.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Slovaško.
OJ C 189, 14.8.2007, p. 2.
UL C 189, 14.8.2007, str. 2.
SK 72/2003 — Slovak Republic — ‘Regional State aid map of the Slovak Republic’; C(2004) 1757/7, 28.4.2004.
SK 72/2003 – Slovaška – „Karta regionalnih državnih pomoči Slovaške“; C(2004) 1757/7, 28.4.2004.
Expressed in terms of the 2007 value and calculated at a reference rate of 5,62 %, the rate applicable at the date of notification.
Izraženo v vrednosti iz leta 2007 in preračunano po referenčni meri 5,62 %, ki je veljala na datum priglasitve.
Confidential information.
Zaupna informacija.
Information from the Annual Report 2005-2006, available on Glunz&Jensen’s website.
Informacije iz Letnega poročila 2005–2006, ki so na voljo na spletni strani družbe Glunz&Jensen.
2008 seems to be a typing error made by the beneficiary in the application for the aid.
Zdi se, da gre pri 2008 za tipkarsko napako upravičenca v zahtevku za pomoč.
In all other documents submitted the year 2009 is indicated as the end of the project.
V vseh drugih predloženih dokumentih je kot konec projekta navedeno leto 2009.
Point 3 of the Application for the provision of State Aid in the form of tax relief.
Točka 3 zahtevka za odobritev državne pomoči v obliki davčne olajšave.
In the submitted notification the Slovak authorities themselves also referred to the two phases as one single investment project. ‘The investment project submitted by the company Glunz&Jensen is being implemented over the period 2004-2009 in two phases: 2004-2006, 2007-2009’.
V predloženi priglasitvi so tudi sami slovaški organi obe fazi navajali kot en sam investicijski projekt: „Investicijski projekt, ki ga je predložila družba Glunz&Jensen, se izvaja v obdobju 2004–2009 v dveh fazah: 2004–2006, 2007–2009“.
Idem.
Enako kot zgoraj.
The objective was to lower the production cost, develop sub-suppliers in central and eastern Europe … Glunz&Jensen has conducted a comparative analysis of 11 central and eastern European countries to decide on the optimal location of the subsidiary …. Out of these 11 countries, the Czech Republic, the Slovak Republic and Bulgaria were investigated.
Cilj je bil znižati proizvodne stroške, razviti mrežo poddobaviteljev v srednji in vzhodni Evropi … Družba Glunz&Jensen je opravila primerjalno analizo enajstih srednje- in vzhodnoevropskih držav, da bi se odločila za optimalno lokacijo hčerinske družbe … Med temi enajstimi državami so bile proučene Češka, Slovaška in Bolgarija.
(notified under document number C(2008) 2931)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 2931)
Commission Decision 2007/716/EC of 30 October 2007 laying down transitional measures [2] for structural requirements of certain establishments in the meat and milk sectors in Bulgaria provided for in Regulations (EC) No 852/2004 and (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Odločba Komisije 2007/716/ES [2] določa prehodne ukrepe za strukturne zahteve glede nekaterih obratov v sektorjih mesa in mleka v Bolgariji iz Uredbe (ES) št. 852/2004 in Uredbe (ES) št. 853/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Decision 2007/716/EC has been amended by Commission Decisions 2008/290/EC [3] and 2008/330/EC.
Odločba 2007/716/ES je bila spremenjena z odločbama Komisije 2008/290/ES [3] in 2008/330/ES.
Decision as last amended by Decision 2008/330/EC (OJ L 114, 26.4.2008, p. 94).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2008/330/ES (UL L 114, 26.4.2008, str. 94).
OJ L 96, 9.4.2008, p. 35.
UL L 96, 9.4.2008, str. 35.
List of establishments to be deleted from the Annex to Decision 2007/716/EC
Seznam obratov, ki jih je treba črtati iz Priloge k Odločbi 2007/716/ES
of 30 June 2008
z dne 30. junija 2008
repealing Decision 2008/377/EC concerning certain protection measures relating to classical swine fever in Slovakia
o razveljavitvi Odločbe 2008/377/ES o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo na Slovaškem
(notified under document number C(2008) 3223)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 3223)
Outbreaks of classical swine fever have occurred in Slovakia.
Na Slovaškem je prišlo do izbruhov klasične prašičje kuge.
Commission Decision 2008/377/EC of 8 May 2008 concerning certain protection measures relating to classical swine fever in Slovakia [2] was adopted in order to reinforce the measures taken by Slovakia within the framework of Council Directive 2001/89/EC of 23 October 2001 on Community measures for the control of classical swine fever [3].
Odločba Komisije 2008/377/ES z dne 8. maja 2008 o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo na Slovaškem [2] je bila sprejeta, da se okrepijo ukrepi, ki jih je Slovaška sprejela v okviru Direktive Sveta 2001/89/ES z dne 23. oktobra 2001 o ukrepih Skupnosti za nadzor nad klasično prašičjo kugo [3].
The information provided by Slovakia indicates that the outbreaks of classical swine fever in that Member State have been eradicated and the results of the epidemiological investigation show that classical swine fever has not spread further.
Informacije, ki jih je predložila Slovaška, kažejo, da so izbruhi klasične prašičje kuge v navedeni državi članici zatrti, rezultati epidemiološke raziskave pa kažejo, da se klasična prašičja kuga ni razširila.
Decision 2008/377/EC should therefore be repealed.
Odločbo 2008/377/ES je zato treba razveljaviti.
Decision 2008/377/EC is repealed.
Odločba 2008/377/ES se razveljavi.
Done at Brussels, 30 June 2008.
V Bruslju, 30. junija 2008
Decision as amended by Decision 2008/419/EC (OJ L 147, 6.6.2008, p. 65).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2008/419/ES (UL L 147, 6.6.2008, str. 65).
of 26 June 2008
junija 2008
concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N1 in Croatia and Switzerland
o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi z visoko patogeno aviarno influenco podtipa H5N1 na Hrvaškem in v Švici
(notified under document number C(2008) 3020)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 3020)
Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC [1], and in particular Article 8(1) and (6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 91/496/EGS z dne 15. julija 1991 o določitvi načel o organizaciji veterinarskih pregledov živali, ki vstopajo v Skupnost iz tretjih držav, in o spremembi direktiv 89/662/EGS, 90/425/EGS ter 90/675/EGS [1] in zlasti člena 8(1) in (6) Direktive,
Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries [2], and in particular Article 2(1) and (5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 97/78/ES z dne 18. decembra 1997 o določitvi načel, ki urejajo organizacijo veterinarskih pregledov proizvodov, ki vstopajo v Skupnost iz tretjih držav [2], in zlasti člena 2(1) in (5) Direktive,
Commission Decision 2006/696/EC of 28 August 2006 laying down a list of third countries from which poultry, hatching eggs, day-old chicks, meat of poultry, ratites and wild game-birds, eggs and egg products and specified pathogen-free eggs may be imported into and transit through the Community and the applicable veterinary certification conditions, and amending Decisions 93/342/EEC, 2000/585/EC and 2003/812/EC [3] lays down veterinary certification conditions for imports into and transit through the Community of poultry and certain products thereof.
Odločba Komisije 2006/696/ES z dne 28. avgusta 2006 o določitvi seznama tretjih držav, iz katerih se dovoli uvoz perutnine, valilnih jajc, enodnevnih piščancev, perutninskega mesa, ratitov in divjih ptic, jajc in jajčnih izdelkov ter jajc, prostih specifičnih patogenih organizmov, v Skupnost in njihov tranzit skozi Skupnost, o veljavnih pogojih za izdajo veterinarskih spričeval in o spremembi odločb 93/342/EGS, 2000/585/ES in 2003/812/ES [3] določa pogoje za izdajo veterinarskih spričeval za uvoz perutnine in nekaterih perutninskih proizvodov v Skupnost ter tranzit navedenih proizvodov skozi Skupnost.
In the interests of clarity and consistency of Community rules, it is appropriate that the definitions of poultry and hatching eggs in that Decision be taken into account for the purposes of this Decision.
Zaradi jasnosti in doslednosti predpisov Skupnosti je primerno, da se za namene te odločbe upoštevajo opredelitve perutnine in valilnih jajc iz navedene odločbe.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 318/2007 of 23 March 2007 laying down animal health conditions for imports of certain birds into the Community and the quarantine conditions thereof [4] lays down the animal health conditions for imports of certain birds into the Community from third countries and parts thereof.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 318/2007 z dne 23. marca 2007 o pogojih zdravstvenega varstva živali pri uvozu nekaterih ptic v Skupnost in pogojih za karanteno teh ptic [4] določa pogoje zdravstvenega varstva živali za uvoz nekaterih ptic v Skupnost iz tretjih držav in njihovih delov.
In the interests of clarity and consistency of Community rules, it is appropriate that the definition of birds in that Regulation be taken into account for the purposes of this Decision.
Zaradi jasnosti in doslednosti predpisov Skupnosti je primerno, da se za namene te odločbe upošteva opredelitev ptic iz navedene uredbe.
Commission Decision 2006/265/EC of 31 March 2006 concerning certain protection measures in relation to a suspicion of highly pathogenic avian influenza in Switzerland [5] and Commission Decision 2006/533/EC of 28 July 2006 concerning certain temporary protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in Croatia [6] were adopted following positive findings for highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N1 in wild birds in both of those third countries.
Odločba Komisije 2006/265/ES z dne 31. marca 2006 o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi s sumom na visoko patogeno aviarno influenco v Švici [5] in Odločba Komisije 2006/533/ES z dne 28. julija 2006 o nekaterih prehodnih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi z visoko patogeno aviarno influenco na Hrvaškem [6] sta bili sprejeti po pozitivnih ugotovitvah visoko patogene aviarne influence podtipa H5N1 pri prosto živečih pticah v obeh navedenih tretjih državah.
Those Decisions provided that Member States are to suspend imports from certain parts of Croatia and Switzerland of live poultry, ratites, farmed and wild feathered game and certain other live birds, including pet birds and hatching eggs of those species, as well as certain products of birds.
V skladu z navedenima odločbama morajo države članice začasno ustaviti uvoz žive perutnine, ratitov, gojene pernate divjadi ter pernate divjadi in nekaterih drugih živih ptic, vključno z ljubiteljskimi vrstami ptic in valilnimi jajci navedenih vrst, ter nekaterih proizvodov iz ptic iz nekaterih delov Hrvaške in Švice.
Commission Decision 2006/415/EC of 14 June 2006 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of the subtype H5N1 in poultry in the Community and repealing Decision 2006/135/EC [7] lays down certain biosecurity and restriction measures to prevent the spread of that disease, including the establishment of areas A and B following a suspected or confirmed outbreak of the disease in poultry.
Odločba Komisije 2006/415/ES z dne 14. junija 2006 o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi z visoko patogeno aviarno influenco podtipa H5N1 pri perutnini v Skupnosti in razveljavitvi Odločbe 2006/135/ES [7] določa nekatere ukrepe biološke varnosti in omejitev za preprečitev prenosa navedene bolezni, vključno z vzpostavitvijo območij A in B po sumu izbruha ali potrjenem izbruhu bolezni pri perutnini.
Commission Decision 2006/563/EC of 11 August 2006 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N1 in wild birds in the Community and repealing Decision 2006/115/EC [8] lays down certain protection measures to prevent the spread of that disease from wild birds to poultry including, based on risk assessment, the establishment of control and monitoring areas taking into account the epidemiological, geographical and ecological factors following a suspected or confirmed positive finding for that disease in wild birds.
Odločba Komisije 2006/563/ES z dne 11. avgusta 2006 o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi z visoko patogeno aviarno influenco podtipa H5N1 pri prosto živečih pticah v Skupnosti in razveljavitvi Odločbe 2006/115/ES [8] določa nekatere zaščitne ukrepe za preprečitev prenosa navedene bolezni s prosto živečih ptic na perutnino vključno z, na podlagi ocene tveganja, vzpostavitvijo območij nadzora in spremljanja ob upoštevanju epidemioloških, geografskih in ekoloških dejavnikov po sumu ali potrditvi pozitivne ugotovitve navedene bolezni pri prosto živečih pticah.
Croatia has notified the Commission that the competent authorities of that third country are applying protection measures that are equivalent to those applied by the competent authorities of the Member States, as provided for in Commission Decision 2006/563/EC, when highly pathogenic avian influenza of H5N1 subtype is suspected or confirmed in wild birds and that it will immediately notify the Commission of any future changes to its animal health status, including specifically any positive findings of that disease in wild birds.
Hrvaška je Komisijo obvestila, da pristojni organi navedene tretje države uporabljajo zaščitne ukrepe, enakovredne tistim, ki jih uporabljajo pristojni organi držav članic, kakor določa Odločba Komisije 2006/563/ES, kadar obstaja sum ali potrditev visoko patogene aviarne influence podtipa H5N1 pri prosto živečih pticah, in da bo Komisiji nemudoma sporočila kakršne koli prihodnje spremembe zdravstvenega stanja živali, vključno zlasti kakršne koli pozitivne ugotovitve navedene bolezni pri prosto živečih pticah.
Switzerland has notified the Commission that the competent authorities of that country are applying protection measures that are equivalent to those applied by the competent authorities of the Member States, as provided for in Decisions 2006/415/EC and 2006/563/EC, when highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N1 is suspected or confirmed in poultry or wild birds and that it will immediately notify the Commission of any future changes to its animal health status, including specifically any outbreak or positive findings of that disease in poultry or wild birds.
Švica je Komisijo obvestila, da pristojni organi navedene tretje države uporabljajo zaščitne ukrepe, enakovredne tistim, ki jih uporabljajo pristojni organi držav članic, kakor določata odločbi 2006/415/ES in 2006/563/ES, kadar obstaja sum ali potrditev visoko patogene aviarne influence podtipa H5N1 pri perutnini ali prosto živečih pticah, in da bo Komisiji nemudoma sporočila kakršne koli prihodnje spremembe zdravstvenega stanja živali, vključno zlasti kakršne koli izbruhe ali pozitivne ugotovitve navedene bolezni pri perutnini ali prosto živečih pticah.
Account should also be taken of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products [9].
Upoštevati je treba tudi Sporazum med Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o trgovini s kmetijskimi proizvodi [9].
The Commission will immediately inform the Member States and forward any such information received from the competent authorities of Croatia and Switzerland to them.
Komisija bo države članice nemudoma seznanila z vsemi informacijami, ki jih bo prejela od hrvaških in švicarskih pristojnih organov, in jim jih tudi posredovala.
Decisions 2006/265/EC and 2006/533/EC expired on 30 June 2007.
Odločbi 2006/265/ES in 2006/533/ES sta prenehali veljati 30. junija 2007.
In the light of the current epidemiological situation as regards highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N1 in the Community and in third countries, and in view of the guarantees received from Croatia, it is appropriate that in the event of a positive finding of that disease in a wild bird in the territory of Croatia, Community protection measures concerning that country are only applied to those parts of Croatia for which the competent authority of that country does apply equivalent protection measures as laid down in Decision 2006/563/EC.
Zaradi trenutnega epidemiološkega stanja v zvezi z visoko patogeno aviarno influenco podtipa H5N1 v Skupnosti in tretjih državah in na podlagi jamstev Hrvaške je primerno, da se ob pozitivni ugotovitvi navedene bolezni pri prosto živečih pticah na ozemlju Hrvaške zaščitni ukrepi Skupnosti za navedeno državo uporabijo samo v tistih delih Hrvaške, v katerih pristojni organ navedene države uporabi zaščitne ukrepe, enakovredne ukrepom iz Odločbe 2006/563/ES.