natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(the following organisations are part of the terrorist group “E.T.A”:“K.a.s.”, “Xaki”; “Ekin”, “Jarrai-Haika-Segi”, “Gestoras pro-amnistía”, “Askatasuna”, “Batasuna” (a.k.a. Herri Batasuna, a.k.a. Euskal Herritarrok), “Acción Nacionalista Vasca”/“Euskal Abertzale Ekintza” (ANV/EAE), “Partido Comunista de las Tierras Vascas”/“Euskal Herrialdeetako Alderdi Komunista” (PCTV/EHAK)).’.
(naslednje organizacije so del teroristične skupine ETA.: K.a.s., Xaki; Ekin, Jarrai-Haika-Segi, Gestoras pro-amnistía, Askatasuna, Batasuna (alias Herri Batasuna, alias Euskal Herritarrok), Acción Nacionalista Vasca/Euskal Abertzale Ekintza (ANV/EAE), Partido Comunista de las Tierras Vascas/Euskal Herrialdeetako Alderdi Komunista (PCTV/EHAK)).“.
Council Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2008/675/PNZ
on taking account of convictions in the Member States of the European Union in the course of new criminal proceedings
o upoštevanju obsodb med državami članicami Evropske unije v novem kazenskem postopku
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 31 and 34(2)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti členov 31 in 34(2)(b) Pogodbe,
The European Union has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice.
Evropska unija si je zastavila cilj ohranjati in razvijati območje svobode, varnosti in pravice.
This objective requires that it be possible for information on convictions handed down in the Member States to be taken into account outside the convicting Member State, both in order to prevent new offences and in the course of new criminal proceedings.
Da bi ta cilj lahko uresničili, je treba omogočiti, da se bodo informacije o obsodbah, izrečenih v državah članicah, lahko upoštevale tudi izven države članice, ki je izrekla obsodbo, za preprečitev novih kaznivih dejanj in ob morebitnih novih kazenskih postopkih.
On 29 November 2000 the Council, in accordance with the conclusions of the Tampere European Council, adopted the programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters [2], which provides for the ‘adoption of one or more instruments establishing the principle that a court in one Member State must be able to take account of final criminal judgments rendered by the courts in other Member States for the purposes of assessing the offender’s criminal record and establishing whether he has reoffended, and in order to determine the type of sentence applicable and the arrangements for enforcing it’.
Svet je 29. novembra 2000 v skladu s sklepi Evropskega sveta iz Tampereja sprejel program ukrepov za izvajanje načela o vzajemnem priznavanju odločb v kazenskih zadevah [2], ki predvideva „sprejetje enega ali več instrumentov o uvedbi načela, da mora biti sodišču v eni državi članici pri oceni kazenske evidence storilca, ugotavljanju povratništva ter določitvi vrste kazni in načina njene izvršitve omogočeno upoštevati pravnomočne kazenske sodbe, ki so jih izrekla sodišča v drugih državah članicah“.
The purpose of this Framework Decision is to establish a minimum obligation for Member States to take into account convictions handed down in other Member States.
Namen tega okvirnega sklepa je državam članicam naložiti minimalno obveznost upoštevanja obsodb, izrečenih v drugih državah članicah.
Thus this Framework Decision should not prevent Member States from taking into account, in accordance with their law and when they have information available, for example, final decisions of administrative authorities whose decisions can be appealed against in the criminal courts establishing guilt of a criminal offence or an act punishable under national law by virtue of being an infringement of the rules of law.
Državam članicam tako ne preprečuje, da v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo in ko imajo na voljo informacije, upoštevajo na primer pravnomočne odločbe upravnih organov, zoper katere se je mogoče pritožiti na kazenskem sodišču, ki ugotovi krivdo za kaznivo dejanje ali dejanje, ki je po nacionalni zakonodaji kaznivo kot kršitev predpisov.
Some Member States attach effects to convictions handed down in other Member States, whereas others take account only of convictions handed down by their own courts.
Medtem ko nekatere države članice obsodbam, izrečenim v drugih državah članicah, priznavajo učinek, druge upoštevajo le obsodbe, izrečene na svojih sodiščih.
The principle that the Member States should attach to a conviction handed down in other Member States effects equivalent to those attached to a conviction handed down by their own courts in accordance with national law should be affirmed, whether those effects be regarded by national law as matters of fact or of procedural or substantive law.
Treba bi bilo uveljaviti načelo, po katerem bi države članice obsodbam, izrečenim v drugih državah članicah, morale priznati učinke, enakovredne tistim, ki jih priznavajo obsodbam, izrečenim v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo na njihovih sodiščih, in sicer ne glede na to, ali te učinke nacionalna zakonodaja obravnava kot dejansko stanje ali kot učinke postopkovnega ali materialnega prava.
However, this Framework Decision does not seek to harmonise the consequences attached by the different national legislations to the existence of previous convictions, and the obligation to take into account previous convictions handed down in other Member States exists only to the extent that previous national convictions are taken into account under national law.
Vendar cilj tega okvirnega sklepa ni uskladiti posledice, ki jih različne nacionalne zakonodaje predvidevajo v zvezi z obstojem prejšnjih obsodb, obveznost upoštevanja prejšnjih obsodb, izrečenih v drugih državah članicah, pa velja le do tiste mere, do katere se prejšnje nacionalne obsodbe upoštevajo po nacionalni zakonodaji.
In contrast to other instruments, this Framework Decision does not aim at the execution in one Member State of judicial decisions taken in other Member States, but rather aims at enabling consequences to be attached to a previous conviction handed down in one Member State in the course of new criminal proceedings in another Member State to the extent that such consequences are attached to previous national convictions under the law of that other Member State.
V nasprotju z drugimi instrumenti namen tega okvirnega sklepa ni izvrševanje sodnih odločb, izdanih v eni državi članici, v drugi državi članici, marveč naj bi z njim omogočili, da bi prejšnje obsodbe, izrečene v določeni državi članice lahko učinkovale v drugi državi članici, in sicer do tiste mere, do katere takšen učinek prejšnjih nacionalnih obsodb predvideva nacionalna zakonodaja.
Therefore this Framework Decision contains no obligation to take into account such previous convictions, for example, in cases where the information obtained under applicable instruments is not sufficient, where a national conviction would not have been possible regarding the act for which the previous conviction had been imposed or where the previously imposed sanction is unknown to the national legal system.
Tako ta okvirni sklep ne nalaga obveznosti upoštevanja prejšnjih obsodb v primerih, ko na primer informacije, pridobljene na podlagi veljavnih instrumentov, ne zadostujejo, ko nacionalna obsodba zaradi dejanja, za katero je bila izrečena prejšnja obsodba, ne bi bila mogoča, ali pa ko prej izrečene kazni zadevni nacionalni pravni sistem ne pozna.
The effects of a conviction handed down in another Member State should be equivalent to the effects of a national decision at the pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings, at the trial stage and at the time of execution of the sentence.
Učinki obsodbe, izrečene v drugi državi članici, bi morali biti enakovredni učinkom nacionalnih odločb, ne glede na to ali gre za predhodni postopek kazenskega postopka, sojenje ali izvršitev kazni.
Where, in the course of criminal proceedings in a Member State, information is available on a previous conviction in another Member State, it should as far as possible be avoided that the person concerned is treated less favourably than if the previous conviction had been a national conviction.
Če so v kazenskem postopku v državi članici na voljo informacije o prejšnji obsodbi v drugi državi članici, je treba, kolikor je mogoče, preprečiti, da se zadevna oseba obravnava manj ugodno, kakor če bi bila prejšnja obsodba nacionalna obsodba.
Article 3(5) should be interpreted, inter alia, in line with recital 8, in such a manner that if the national court in the new criminal proceedings, when taking into account a previously imposed sentence handed down in another Member State, is of the opinion that imposing a certain level of sentence within the limits of national law would be disproportionately harsh on the offender, considering his or her circumstances, and if the purpose of the punishment can be achieved by a lower sentence, it may reduce the level of sentence accordingly, if doing so would have been possible in purely domestic cases.
Člen 3(5) bi bilo treba med drugim razlagati v skladu z uvodno izjavo 8, torej če nacionalno sodišče v novem kazenskem postopku ob upoštevanju prej izrečene kazni v drugi državi članici meni, da bi bila izrečena kazen po svoji višini v okviru omejitev nacionalne zakonodaje ob upoštevanju storilčevih okoliščin do njega nesorazmerno stroga, ter če se namen kaznovanja lahko doseže z nižjo kaznijo, lahko nacionalno sodišče ustrezno zniža višino kazni, če bi bilo tako mogoče ravnati storilcav povsem nacionalnih primerih.
This Framework Decision is to replace the provisions of Article 56 of the European Convention of 28 May 1970 on the International Validity of Criminal Judgments, concerning the taking into consideration of criminal judgments, as between the Member States parties to that Convention.
Ta okvirni sklep naj bi nadomestil določbe iz člena 56 Evropske Konvencije z dne 28. maja 1970 o mednarodni veljavnosti kazenskih sodb, o upoštevanju kazenskih razsodb, v odnosih med državami članicami pogodbenicami te konvencije.
This Framework Decision respects the principle of subsidiarity provided for by Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union and Article 5 of the Treaty establishing the European Community in so far as it aims to approximate the laws and regulations of the Member States, which cannot be done adequately by the Member States acting unilaterally and requires concerted action in the European Union.
Ta okvirni sklep spoštuje načelo subsidiarnosti iz člena 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in člena 5 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, kolikor je njegov cilj približati zakone in predpise držav članic, česar države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči enostransko, in je zato potrebno usklajeno ukrepanje na ravni Evropske unije.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, this Framework Decision does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, ta okvirni sklep ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za izpolnitev navedenega cilja.
This Framework Decision respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union and reflected in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Ta okvirni sklep spoštuje temeljne pravice in načela, priznana v členu 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in upoštevana v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
This Framework Decision respects the variety of domestic solutions and procedures required for taking into account a previous conviction handed down in another Member State.
Ta okvirni sklep spoštuje različne notranje rešitve in postopke, potrebne za upoštevanje prejšnjih obsodb v drugi državi članici.
The exclusion of a possibility to review a previous conviction should not prevent a Member State from issuing a decision, if necessary, in order to attach the equivalent legal effects to such previous conviction.
Izključitev možnosti revizije prejšnje obsodbe državi članici ne preprečuje, da bi izdala odločbo, s katero po potrebi tem prejšnjim obsodbam prizna enakovredne pravne učinke.
However, the procedures involved in issuing such a decision should not, in view of the time and procedures or formalities required, render it impossible to attach equivalent effects to a previous conviction handed down in another Member State.
Ne glede na to postopki, ki se uporabijo za izdajo takšne odločbe, ob upoštevanju potrebnega časa in postopkov ali formalnosti, ne bi smeli onemogočati, da se prejšnji obsodbi iz druge države članice prizna enakovreden učinek.
Interference with a judgment or its execution covers, inter alia, situations where, according to the national law of the second Member State, the sanction imposed in a previous judgment is to be absorbed by or included in another sanction, which is then to be effectively executed, to the extent that the first sentence has not already been executed or its execution has not been transferred to the second Member State,
Poseganje v sodbo ali njeno izvršitev zajema med drugim primere, ko se v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo druge države članice s prejšnjo sodbo izrečena kazen prevzame ali vključi v drugo kazen, ki jo je nato treba dejansko izvršiti, in sicer do tiste mere, do katere prva kazen še ni bila izvršena ali njena izvršitev ni bila prenesena v drugo državo članico –
The purpose of this Framework Decision is to determine the conditions under which, in the course of criminal proceedings in a Member State against a person, previous convictions handed down against the same person for different facts in other Member States, are taken into account.
Namen tega okvirnega sklepa je opredeliti pogoje, pod katerimi se v kazenskem postopku proti določeni osebi v državi članici upoštevajo prejšnje obsodbe, izrečene proti isti osebi zaradi drugih dejanj v drugih državah članicah.
This Framework Decision shall not have the effect of amending the obligation to respect the fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles as enshrined in Article 6 of the Treaty.
Ta okvirni sklep ne spreminja obveznosti spoštovanja temeljnih pravic in temeljnih pravnih načel iz člena 6 Pogodbe.
For the purposes of this Framework Decision ‘conviction’ means any final decision of a criminal court establishing guilt of a criminal offence.
V tem okvirnem sklepu „obsodba“ pomeni vsako pravnomočno kazensko razsodbo, s katero je ugotovljena krivda za kaznivo dejanje.
Taking into account, in the course of new criminal proceedings, a conviction handed down in another Member State
Upoštevanje obsodbe, izrečene v drugi državi članici, v novem kazenskem postopku
Each Member State shall ensure that in the course of criminal proceedings against a person, previous convictions handed down against the same person for different facts in other Member States, in respect of which information has been obtained under applicable instruments on mutual legal assistance or on the exchange of information extracted from criminal records, are taken into account to the extent previous national convictions are taken into account, and that equivalent legal effects are attached to them as to previous national convictions, in accordance with national law.
Vsaka država članica poskrbi, da se v skladu z nacionalnim pravom v kazenskem postopku proti določeni osebi upoštevajo prejšnje obsodbe, izrečene proti isti osebi zaradi drugih dejanj v drugih državah članicah, v zvezi s katerimi so bile v skladu z veljavnimi instrumenti o vzajemni pravni pomoči ali izmenjavi informacij iz kazenske evidence pridobljene informacije, kolikor se upoštevajo prejšnje nacionalne obsodbe in so priznani enakovredni pravni učinki, kot jih priznavajo prejšnjim nacionalnim obsodbam.
Paragraph 1 shall apply at the pre-trial stage, at the trial stage itself and at the time of execution of the conviction, in particular with regard to the applicable rules of procedure, including those relating to provisional detention, the definition of the offence, the type and level of the sentence, and the rules governing the execution of the decision.
Odstavek 1 se uporablja v predhodnem postopku, med sojenjem in pri izvršitvi sodbe, zlasti v zvezi z veljavnimi postopkovnimi pravili, vključno s tistimi o začasnem pridržanju, opredelitvi kaznivega dejanja, vrsti in višini kazni in pravili, ki urejajo izvršitev odločbe.
The taking into account of previous convictions handed down in other Member States, as provided for in paragraph 1, shall not have the effect of interfering with, revoking or reviewing previous convictions or any decision relating to their execution by the Member State conducting the new proceedings.
Z upoštevanjem prejšnjih obsodb, izrečenih v drugih državah članicah, kot določa odstavek 1, se ne posega v prejšnje obsodbe ali kakršne koli odločitve, povezane z njihovim izvrševanjem v državi, v kateri poteka nov postopek, niti se jih ne razveljavlja ali revidira.
In accordance with paragraph 3, paragraph 1 shall not apply to the extent that, had the previous conviction been a national conviction of the Member State conducting the new proceedings, the taking into account of the previous conviction would, according to the national law of that Member State, have had the effect of interfering with, revoking or reviewing the previous conviction or any decision relating to its execution.
V skladu z odstavkom 3 se odstavek 1 v primeru, da je bila prejšnja obsodba nacionalna obsodba države članice, v kateri poteka nov postopek, ne uporablja, če bi se z upoštevanjem prejšnje obsodbe v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo te države članice posegalo v prejšnjo obsodbo ali kakršno koli odločitev, povezano z njenim izvrševanjem, ali pa bi se jo razveljavilo ali revidiralo.
If the offence for which the new proceedings being conducted was committed before the previous conviction had been handed down or fully executed, paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not have the effect of requiring Member States to apply their national rules on imposing sentences, where the application of those rules to foreign convictions would limit the judge in imposing a sentence in the new proceedings.
Če je kaznivo dejanje, ki je predmet novega postopka, storjeno pred izrekom in popolno izvršitvijo prejšnje obsodbe, odstavka 1 in 2 s svojim učinkom držav članic ne obvezujeta uporabljati nacionalnih pravil o izrekanju kazni, katerih učinek, če bi bila uporabljena kot taka za tuje obsodbe, bi bil ta, da bi sodnika omejevala pri izrekanju kazni v novem postopku.
However, the Member States shall ensure that in such cases their courts can otherwise take into account previous convictions handed down in other Member States.
Vendar države članice poskrbijo, da njihova sodišča takšne primere prejšnjih obsodb, izrečenih v drugih državah članicah, sicer lahko upoštevajo.
This Framework Decision shall replace Article 56 of the European Convention of 28 May 1970 on the International Validity of Criminal Judgments as between the Member States parties to that Convention, without prejudice to the application of that Article in relations between the Member States and third countries.
Ta okvirni sklep nadomešča določbe člena 56 Evropske konvencije o mednarodni veljavnosti kazenskih sodb, sestavljene v Haagu dne 28. maja 1970, in sicer v odnosih med državami članicami pogodbenicami te konvencije; ne posega v uporabo navedenega člena v odnosih med državami članicami in tretjimi državami.
Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with the provisions of this Framework Decision by 15 August 2010.
Države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, potrebne za uskladitev z določbami tega okvirnega sklepa, najkasneje 15. avgusta 2010.
Member States shall communicate to the General Secretariat of the Council and to the Commission the text of the provisions transposing into their national law the obligations imposed on them under this Framework Decision.
Države članice generalnemu sekretariatu Sveta in Komisiji predložijo besedilo določb, s katerimi so v nacionalno zakonodajo prenesle obveznosti, ki jim jih nalaga ta okvirni sklep.
On the basis of that information the Commission shall, by 15 August 2011, present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Framework Decision, accompanied if necessary by legislative proposals.
Na podlagi teh informacij Komisija najpozneje do 15. avgusta 2011 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo o uporabi tega okvirnega sklepa, po potrebi skupaj z zakonodajnimi predlogi.
Opinion of 27 September 2006 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 27 septembra 2006 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu)
Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA
Okvirni Sklep Sveta 2008/841/PNZ
on the fight against organised crime
o boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 29, 31(1)(e) and 34(2)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti členov 29, 31(1)(e) in 34(2)(b) Pogodbe,
The objective of the Hague Programme is to improve the common capability of the Union and the Member States for the purpose, among others, of combating transnational organised crime.
Cilj Haaškega programa je izboljšati skupne zmogljivosti Unije in njenih držav članic, med drugim zaradi boja proti mednarodnemu organiziranemu kriminalu.
This objective is to be pursued by, in particular, the approximation of legislation.
To je cilj, ki ga je treba doseči zlasti s približevanjem zakonodaje.
Closer cooperation between the Member States of the European Union is needed in order to counter the dangers and proliferation of criminal organisations and to respond effectively to citizens’ expectations and Member States’ own requirements.
Tesnejše sodelovanje med državami članicami Evropske unije je potrebno zaradi odziva na nevarnosti in razvoja hudodelskih združb ter učinkovitega odziva v skladu s pričakovanji državljanov in potrebami držav članic.
In this respect point 14 of the conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 4 and 5 November 2004 states that the citizens of Europe expect the European Union, while guaranteeing respect for fundamental freedoms and rights, to take a more effective, combined approach to cross-border problems such as organised crime.
V zvezi s tem točka 14 sklepov Evropskega sveta iz Bruslja z dne 4. in 5. novembra 2004 navaja, da državljani Evrope pričakujejo, da bo Evropska unija, ob zagotavljanju spoštovanja temeljnih svoboščin in pravic, začela izvajati učinkovitejši skupni pristop do čezmejne problematike, kot je organiziran kriminal.
In its Communication of 29 March 2004 on measures to be taken to combat terrorism and other forms of serious crime, the Commission considered that the facilities available for combating organised crime in the EU needed to be strengthened and stated that it would draw up a Framework Decision to replace Joint Action 98/733/JHA of 21 December 1998 on making it a criminal offence to participate in a criminal organisation in the Member States of the European Union [2].
Komisija je v svojem sporočilu z dne 29. marca 2004 o ukrepih, ki jih je treba uvesti v boju proti terorizmu in drugim oblikam hudih kaznivih dejanj, ugotovila, da je treba okrepiti zmogljivosti za boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu v Evropski uniji, in navedla, da bo pripravila okvirni sklep, ki bo nadomestil Skupni ukrep 98/733/PNZ z dne 21. decembra 1998 o kaznivosti udeležbe v hudodelski združbi v državah članicah Evropske unije [2].