natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On 30 October 2006, the Commission imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1620/2006 [2] (the provisional Regulation) a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports into the Community of ironing boards originating in the People’s Republic of China and Ukraine (the countries concerned).
Komisija je 30. oktobra 2006 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1620/2006 [2] („začasna uredba“) uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz likalnih desk s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Ukrajine (zadevni državi) v Skupnost.
This Regulation entered into force on 1 November 2006.
Ta uredba je začela veljati 1. novembra 2006.
It is recalled that the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2005 (the investigation period or IP).
Treba je opozoriti, da je preiskava dampinga in škode zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2005 do 31. decembra 2005 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
The examination of trends relevant for the injury analysis covered the period from 1 January 2002 to the end of the IP (the period considered).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za analizo škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2002 do konca OP (obravnavano obdobje).
Following the imposition of a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of ironing boards from the countries concerned, all parties received a disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on which the provisional Regulation was based (the provisional disclosure).
Po uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz likalnih desk iz zadevnih držav so vse stranke prejele obvestilo o razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na katerih je temeljila začasna uredba („začasno razkritje“).
All parties were granted a period within which they could make written and oral representations in relation to this disclosure.
Vsem strankam je bilo odobreno obdobje, v katerem so lahko predložile pisna in ustna stališča glede teh razkritij.
The Commission continued to seek and verify all information it deemed necessary for its definitive findings.
Komisija je nadaljevala iskanje in preverjanje vseh informacij, za katere je menila, da so potrebne za njene dokončne ugotovitve.
All interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty and the definitive collection of amounts secured by way of the provisional duty (the final disclosure).
Vse zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se nameravata priporočiti uvedba dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončno pobiranje zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo („dokončno razkritje“).
The interested parties were also granted a period within which they could make representations subsequent to this disclosure.
Zainteresiranim strankam je bilo odobreno tudi obdobje, v katerem so lahko predložile svoja stališča v zvezi s tem razkritjem.
It is recalled that, as set out in recital 12 of the provisional Regulation, the product concerned by this proceeding is ironing boards, whether or not free-standing, with or without a steam soaking and/or heating top and/or blowing top, including sleeve boards, and essential parts thereof, i.e. the legs, the top and the iron rest originating in the People’s Republic of China and Ukraine (the product concerned).
Treba je opozoriti, kot je določeno v uvodni izjavi 12 začasne uredbe, da je izdelek, ki ga ta postopek zadeva, likalne deske, prostostoječe ali ne, z ali brez sistema za vsrkavanje odvečne pare in/ali ogrevalnega sistema in/ali sistema za pihanje zraka, vključno z rokavniki, in njihovi bistveni deli, tj. podnožje, prevleka in odlagalna površina za likalnik, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Ukrajine („zadevni izdelek“).
One party argued that the ironing boards with a steam soaking and/or heating top and/or blowing top should be excluded from the scope of the measures, since such models are sold at a minimum retail price of EUR 200, whilst the average retail price of an ironing board is EUR 35. It was also argued that the aforesaid models are often sold to the consumer as a package including a steam iron, in which case the average retail price is about EUR 500.
Ena stranka je trdila, da je treba likalne deske s sistemom za vsrkavanje odvečne pare in/ali ogrevalnim sistemom in/ali sistemom za pihanje zraka izključiti iz obsega ukrepov, ker se taki tipi prodajajo pa najnižji maloprodajni ceni 200 EUR, medtem ko je povprečna maloprodajna cena likalne deske 35 EUR. Trdila je še, da so prej navedeni tipi potrošniku pogosto prodani v paketu s parnim likalnikom, v tem primeru je povprečna maloprodajna cena približno 500 EUR. Treba je opozoriti, da cene same po sebi, zlasti pa maloprodajne cene, niso dejavnik, ki ga je treba upoštevati pri ocenjevanju, ali je treba dva ali več vrst izdelka (modelov) v protidampinškem postopku šteti za en izdelek ali ne.
As far as the price element is concerned, it is noted that prices per se, and in particular retail prices, are not a factor to be considered when assessing whether or not two or more product types (models) should be considered as one single product for the purpose of an anti-dumping proceeding.
Za določanje izdelka se uporabljajo njegove osnovne fizikalne lastnosti in uporaba, zato se šteje, da so take vrste izdelkov podobne izdelkom brez sistema za vsrkavanje odvečne pare in/ali ogrevalnega sistema.
It is the basic physical characteristics and uses which are considered for this purpose and, to this end, such types are considered similar to those without steam soaking and/or heating top. As far as retail sales of ironing boards together with irons or steam irons are concerned, the investigation established that such retail sales method is occasionally being used for all different types of ironing boards and, in any event, the different prices of the various combinations cannot justify the exclusion of any ironing board type from the product scope of this proceeding.
Glede prodaje na drobno likalnih desk v paketu z likalniki ali parnimi likalniki je preiskava pokazala, da se tak način prodaje na drobno občasno uporablja za vse različne vrste likalnih desk ter da različne cene za različne kombinacije ne morejo opravičiti izključitve katere koli vrste likalne deske iz opredelitve izdelka v tem postopku.
The same party also argued that the essential parts of the ironing boards should not be included in the scope of the measures, since there is allegedly no market for these parts in the Community and there are apparently no manufacturers of these parts in the People’s Republic of China (the PRC) and Ukraine.
Ista stranka je obenem trdila, da je treba iz obsega ukrepov izključiti bistvene dele likalnih desk, ker domnevno za te dele v Skupnosti ni trga, v Ljudski republiki Kitajski („LRK“) in Ukrajini pa ni proizvajalcev.
This argument, which is as such not decisive for the definition of a product, was in any event not confirmed by the investigation.
Preiskava ni potrdila te, za opredelitev izdelka nebistvene utemeljitve.
It was in fact established that a certain market for the essential parts of the ironing boards exists and that at least two known Chinese producers of ironing boards exported essential parts thereof to the Community.
Ugotovljeno je bilo celo, da trg za bistvene dele likalnih desk obstaja in da sta vsaj dva znana kitajska proizvajalca likalnih desk njihove bistvene dele izvažala v Skupnost.
In view of the above, it is concluded that all types of ironing boards and the essential parts thereof mentioned in recital 6 above share the same basic physical and technical characteristics, have the same basic end-uses and compete with one another on the Community market.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se sklene, da imajo vse vrste likalnih desk in njihovi bistveni deli, navedeni v uvodni izjavi 6, enake fizikalne ter tehnične lastnosti, osnovne končne uporabe ter si konkurirajo na trgu Skupnosti.
On this basis, recitals 12 and 13 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Na tej podlagi se potrdita uvodni izjavi 12 in 13 začasne uredbe.
In the absence of any comments, recital 14 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene pripombe, se potrdi uvodna izjava 14 začasne uredbe.
In view of the above, it is definitively concluded that, in accordance with Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation, the product concerned and ironing boards, whether or not free-standing, with or without a steam soaking and/or heating top and/or blowing top, including sleeve boards, and the essential parts thereof produced and sold in the analogue country Turkey, as well as those produced and sold by the Community industry on the Community market are alike.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se dokončno sklene, da so v skladu s členom 1(4) osnovne uredbe zadevni izdelek in likalne deske, prostostoječe ali ne, z ali brez sistema za vsrkavanje odvečne pare in/ali ogrevalnega sistema in/ali sistema za pihanje zraka, vključno z rokavniki, in njihovi bistveni deli, izdelane in prodane v primerljivi državi Turčiji, ter izdelek, ki ga je industrija Skupnosti izdelala in prodala na trgu Skupnosti, podobni.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, one Chinese cooperating exporting producer claimed that it should have been granted MET.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov je en kitajski sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da mu je treba odobriti TGO.
The company reiterated that the accounting practices set out in recital 25 of the provisional Regulation, which led to the rejection of MET of five Chinese exporting producers (three were rejected only for this reason), were not sufficiently material to affect the reliability of the accounts, which were in fact complete, and do not impact on the determination of the dumping margin.
Družba je ponovila, da računovodske prakse, določene v uvodni izjavi 25 začasne uredbe, ki je vodila do zavrnitve TGO petim kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom (trem je bila TGO zavrnjena samo iz tega razloga), niso bile zadostno utemeljene, da bi vplivale na zanesljivost računovodskih izkazov, ki so dejansko bili dokončni, in ne vplivajo na določitev stopnje dampinga.
In this respect, it is noted that the aforesaid accounting practices used by the company were found during the on-the-spot verification visit to be in clear breach of the International Accounting Standards (IAS), namely IAS No 1, and could not be considered immaterial.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je bilo med preveritvenem obisku na kraju samem ugotovljeno, da so bile prej navedene računovodske prakse, ki jih je družba uporabljala, jasna kršitev mednarodnih računovodskih standardov („MRS“), zlasti MRS 1, zato se jih ne more šteti za nepomembne.
No new evidence which could alter the findings set out in recital 25 of the provisional Regulation was submitted.
Predloženi niso bili nobeni novi dokazi, ki bi lahko spremenili ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 25 začasne uredbe.
In the absence of any other relevant and substantiated comment, recitals 15 to 28 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker drugih utemeljenih pripomb v zvezi s tem ni bilo, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 15 do 28 začasne uredbe.
In the absence of any comments, recitals 29 to 34 of the provisional Regulation concerning individual treatment are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 29 do 34 začasne uredbe.
In the absence of any comments on the choice of Turkey as the analogue country, recitals 35 to 40 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb na izbiro Turčije kot primerljive države, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 35 do 40 začasne uredbe.
Determination of normal value for the exporting producers granted MET
Določitev normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim je bila odobrena TGO
It is recalled that the normal value determination for one Chinese and the sole Ukrainian exporting producer granted MET was based on the data these companies submitted on domestic sales and cost of production.
Opozoriti je treba, da je bila določitev normalne vrednosti za enega kitajskega in edinega ukrajinskega proizvajalca izvoznika, ki jima je bila TGO odobrena, utemeljena na predloženih podatkih o domači prodaji in proizvodnih stroških zadevnih družb.
It is furthermore recalled that the Chinese and the Ukrainian exporting producer granted MET did not have sufficient representative domestic sales and that normal value was established according to Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, i.e. normal value was constructed by adding to the manufacturing costs a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses and a reasonable margin of profit.
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da kitajski in ukrajinski proizvajalec izvoznik, ki jima je bila odobrena TGO, nista imela dovolj reprezentativne domače prodaje in da je bila normalna vrednost določena v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe, tj. normalna vrednost je konstruirana tako, da se je proizvodnim stroškom dodal razumni znesek za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške („PSA-stroški“) ter primerna stopnja dobička.
With reference to recital 44 of the provisional Regulation, the Commission further examined the cost of production, and in particular the purchase prices of certain raw materials made of steel, reported by the Chinese producer granted initially MET.
Komisija je s sklicevanjem na uvodno izjavo 44 začasne uredbe podrobneje proučila proizvodne stroške, ki jih je prijavil kitajski proizvajalec, ki mu je bila TGO prvotno odobrena, zlasti nakupne cene določenih surovin iz jekla.
In this respect, the allegations and additional evidence received from certain parties following the provisional disclosure were also considered and verified.
V zvezi s tem so bili upoštevani in preverjeni dodatni dokazi, ki so jih po začasnem razkritju predložile nekatere stranke.
No divergence of the purchase prices of steel reported by the company concerned from the corresponding world prices was confirmed.
Potrjena niso bila nobena razhajanja med nakupnimi cenami jekla, ki jih je prijavila zadevna družba, in ustreznimi cenami na svetovnem trgu.
The cost of production submitted by this company is therefore definitively accepted.
Zato se dokončno sprejmejo proizvodni stroški, ki jih je predložila ta družba.
In the absence of any other comments concerning normal value for the Chinese exporting producer granted MET, the findings set out in recitals 43 to 46 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb v zvezi z normalno vrednostjo za kitajskega proizvajalca izvoznika, ki mu je bila odobrena TGO, se potrdijo ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 43 do 46 začasne uredbe.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, the Ukrainian authorities requested the Commission to recalculate normal value for the sole Ukrainian exporter on the basis of sales on the Ukrainian market.
Ukrajinski organi so po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov zaprosili Komisijo, da na podlagi prodaje na trgu Ukrajine ponovno izračuna normalno vrednost, določeno za edinega ukrajinskega izvoznika.
It should be recalled that, for the sole Ukrainian exporting producer, the overall domestic sales of the product concerned during the IP were not made in representative quantities pursuant to Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation and, thus, normal value had to be constructed as mentioned in recital 18 above and as explained in recital 47 of the provisional Regulation.
Opozoriti je treba, da v primeru edinega ukrajinskega proizvajalca izvoznika skupna količina domače prodaje zadevnega izdelka v OP ni bila reprezentativna v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe, zato je bilo treba normalno vrednost konstruirati, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 18 zgoraj in pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 47 začasne uredbe.
In the absence of any other comments concerning normal value for the sole Ukrainian exporting producer, the findings set out in recitals 47 to 49 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb v zvezi z normalno vrednostjo za edinega ukrajinskega proizvajalca izvoznika, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 47 do 49 začasne uredbe.
One importer argued that the information received from just one producer in Turkey, the analogue country, does not suffice for the purpose of the determination of normal value and that given such insufficient grounds no anti-dumping duties shall be imposed.
En uvoznik je trdil, da informacije, prejete od zgolj enega proizvajalca, v primerljivi državi Turčiji, ne zadoščajo za določitev normalne vrednosti in da glede na tako nezadostne razloge ni mogoče uvesti protidampinških dajatev.
In this respect, it is noted that the basic Regulation, and in particular Article 2(7) thereof, does not preclude the imposition of the measures in case of low or no cooperation from producers in analogue countries.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da osnovna uredba, zlasti člen 2(7) uredbe, ne izključuje uvedbe ukrepov zaradi slabega sodelovanja ali nesodelovanja proizvajalcev primerljive države.
It is however added that, for the sake of ensuring as accurate a finding as possible, the Commission nevertheless compared the information received from the sole cooperating producer in the analogue country with the information received from another Turkish producer and from one US producer, which did not fully cooperate in the investigation but agreed to provide certain information on prices, costs and volume of sales, and from the Community industry.
Vendar je treba dodati, da je Komisija zaradi zagotavljanja čimvečje točnosti primerjala informacije, ki jih je predložil edini sodelujoči proizvajalec v primerljivi državi, z informacijami drugega turškega proizvajalca in enega ameriškega proizvajalca, ki nista v celoti sodelovala v preiskavi, sta pa pristala na zagotavljanje določenih informacij o cenah, stroških in obsegu prodaje, ter z informacijami industrije Skupnosti.
Such comparison confirmed that the data from the cooperating Turkish producer constitute an appropriate reasonable basis for the determination of normal value.
Primerjava je potrdila, da so podatki sodelujočega turškega proizvajalca verodostojna podlaga za določitev normalne vrednosti.
In the absence of any other comments in this respect, recitals 50 to 52 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb v zvezi s tem ni bilo, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 50 do 52 začasne uredbe.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, one exporting producer from the PRC referred to in recital 57 of the provisional Regulation maintained that its export sales via unrelated trading companies should not be excluded from the export price determination.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov je en proizvajalec izvoznik iz LRK, naveden v uvodni izjavi 57 začasne uredbe, trdil, da se njegovega izvoza prek nepovezanih trgovskih družb ne sme izključiti iz določitve izvozne cene.
However, the company failed to provide any additional verifiable evidence supporting its claims; in particular, the company failed to substantiate the final destinations of its sales via unrelated parties.
Vendar družba ni zagotovila nobenih dodatnih dokazov v podporo svojim trditvam; družba zlasti ni opredelila namembnih držav svoje prodaje preko nepovezanih strank.
The claim is therefore rejected.
Zahtevek se zato zavrne.
One other exporting producer from the PRC argued that its sales to the EC via its related Hong Kong based trading company should not have been disregarded.
Drug proizvajalec izvoznik iz LRK je trdil, da je treba upoštevati njegovo prodajo v ES preko povezane trgovske družbe s sedežem v Hongkongu.
The company reiterated its initial claim on the non-exclusion of these particular sales from the calculation of the export prices, but it was not able to provide any new and verifiable information or explanation.
Družba je ponovila svojo osnovno trditev, da zadevne prodaje ni izključila iz izračuna izvozne cene, vendar ni zagotovila nobene nove informacije ali pojasnila.
It could not demonstrate that the reported export prices to independent customers in the Community were actually paid.
Družba ni mogla dokazati, da so bile sporočene izvozne cene, za neodvisne stranke v Skupnosti dejansko plačane.
Also, the Hong Kong trader’s purchases were not reconcilable with its audited accounts.
Poleg tega nakupov hongkonškega trgovca ni bilo mogoče uskladiti z njegovimi revidiranimi računovodskimi izkazi.
The same party argued that the Commission should have used its own exchange rates when calculating export prices.
Ista stranka je trdila, da bi morala Komisija pri izračunu izvozne cene upoštevati njene menjalne tečaje.
In this respect, it is noted that the company reported all its transactions for each month using the exchange rate of the first working day of the month.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je družba za vse svoje prijavljene vsakomesečne transakcije uporabila menjalni tečaj prvega delovnega dne v mesecu.
This claim is rejected as the monthly average exchange rate used by the Commission in its calculations represents more accurately the real situation because it neutralises the effect of the use of a fixed rate of one only day in converting transactions that took place within a whole month.
Ta trditev se zavrne, saj povprečni mesečni menjalni tečaj, ki ga uporablja Komisija v svojih izračunih, natančneje odraža dejansko stanje, ker izniči učinek uporabe statičnega dnevnega tečaja na menjalne transakcije, ki so se odvijale v celem mesecu.
The Community industry alleged that the export prices reported by the cooperating exporting producers, and in particular the company referred to in recital 69 of the provisional Regulation, are wrong.
Industrija Skupnosti je trdila, da so prijavljene izvozne cene sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, zlasti družbe iz uvodne izjave 69 začasne uredbe, napačne.
However, the evidence submitted in this respect was either irrelevant or unverifiable or it did not show any discrepancies.
Vendar so bili predloženi dokazi v zvezi s tem bodisi neustrezni bodisi nepreverljivi, ali pa niso pokazali nobenih neskladij.
The allegations are thus considered unfounded.
Trditve se zato štejejo za neutemeljene.
In the absence of any other comments in this respect, recitals 53 to 58 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb v zvezi s tem ni bilo, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 53 do 58 začasne uredbe.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, the Ukrainian authorities and the sole Ukrainian exporting producer claimed that when determining the export price, no deduction should be made for the related company’s SG&A and profit, as Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation is not applicable in the present case.
Ukrajinski organi in edini ukrajinski proizvajalec izvoznik so po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov trdili, da se v tem primeru ne uporablja člen 2(9) osnovne uredbe, in se zato določitev izvozne cene ne sme odbiti PSA-stroškov in stopnje dobička za povezano družbo.
It was argued that Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation only applies to related importers located in the Community as its wording makes a clear distinction between ‘importation and resale’.
Trdili so, da se člen 2(9) osnovne uredbe uporablja samo za povezane uvoznike, ki imajo sedež v Skupnosti, ker je iz besedila jasno razvidna razlika med „uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo“.
The sole Ukrainian exporting producer submitted that its related company acts as an export department, and both interested parties argued that the export price should be established on the basis of Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Edini ukrajinski proizvajalec izvoznik je prijavil, da njegova povezana družba deluje kot izvozni oddelek, obe zainteresirani stranki pa sta trdili, da je treba izvozno ceno določiti na podlagi člena 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
Furthermore, they argued that if the related company could not be considered as an export department of the exporting producer it should be considered as a sales agent.
Poleg tega sta trdili, da je treba povezano družbo, če se ne more šteti kot izvozni oddelek proizvajalca izvoznika, šteti za prodajnega zastopnika.