natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having regard to Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors [1], and in particular Article 30(4) and (6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2004/17/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil naročnikov v vodnem, energetskem in transportnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev [1] in zlasti člena 30(4) in (6) Direktive,
Having regard to the request submitted by the Kingdom of Denmark by e-mail of 20 November 2006, and to the additional information requested by Commission staff by e-mail of 8 December 2006 and submitted by the Danish authorities by e-mail of 22 December 2006,
ob upoštevanju zahtevka, ki ga je Kraljevina Danska poslala po elektronski pošti 20. novembra 2006, in dodatnih informacij, ki so jih službe Komisije zahtevale po elektronski pošti dne 8. decembra 2006, danski organi pa poslali po elektronski pošti dne 22. decembra 2006,
Having regard to the conclusions of the independent national authority, Konkurrencestyrelsen (the Danish Competition Authority), that the conditions for the applicability of Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC would be met,
ob upoštevanju ugotovitve neodvisnega danskega organa Konkurrencestyrelsen (danskega organa za konkurenco), da so pogoji za uporabo člena 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES izpolnjeni,
Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC provides that contracts intended to enable the performance of one of the activities to which the Directive applies shall not be subject to the Directive if, in the Member State in which it is carried out, the activity is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted.
Člen 30 Direktive 2004/17/ES določa, da se Direktiva ne uporablja za pogodbe, katerih namen je omogočiti opravljanje ene od dejavnosti, na katere se Direktiva nanaša, če je v državi članici, v kateri se dejavnost opravlja, slednja neposredno izpostavljena konkurenci na trgih, na katere dostop ni omejen.
Direct exposure to competition is assessed on the basis of objective criteria, taking account of the specific characteristics of the sector concerned.
Neposredna izpostavljenost konkurenci se ocenjuje na podlagi objektivnih meril, ob upoštevanju posebnih značilnosti zadevnega sektorja.
Access is deemed to be unrestricted if the Member State has implemented and applied the relevant Community legislation opening a given sector or a part of it.
Dostop se šteje kot prost, če je država članica uvedla in izvaja zadevno zakonodajo Skupnosti, ki odpira določen sektor ali njegov del.
This legislation is listed in Annex XI of Directive 2004/17/EC, which, in the case of postal services, refers to Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 on common rules for the development of the internal market of Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service [2].
Ta zakonodaja je navedena v Prilogi XI k Direktivi 2004/17/ES, ki se, ko gre za poštne storitve, sklicuje na Direktivo 97/67/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. decembra 1997 o skupnih pravilih za razvoj notranjega trga poštnih storitev v Skupnosti in za izboljšanje kakovosti storitve [2].
Under Article 62(2) of Directive 2004/17/EC, Title III of that Directive setting out the rules on service design contests does not apply to contests organised for the pursuit, in the Member State concerned, of an activity to which the applicability of Article 30(1) of the Directive has been established by a Commission decision or has been deemed applicable under the second or third subparagraph of Article 30(4) or the fourth subparagraph of Article 30(5).
V skladu s členom 62(2) Direktive 2004/17/ES se naslov III navedene direktive, ki določa pravila za natečaje na področju storitev, ne uporablja za natečaje, organizirane v zadevni državi članici za opravljanje dejavnosti, za katero se člen 30(1) Direktive uporablja na podlagi odločbe Komisije ali za katero se šteje, da se navedeni člen uporablja na podlagi drugega ali tretjega pododstavka člena 30(4) ali četrtega pododstavka člena 30(5).
The request submitted by the Kingdom of Denmark concerns certain courier and parcel services in Denmark.
Zahtevek Kraljevine Danske se nanaša na nekatere storitve kurirske in paketne pošte na Danskem.
More precisely, the services concerned can be described as Business to Business (BtB) parcel services, domestic and international; light goods/pallet goods services, domestic and international; as well as courier and express services, domestic and international.
Natančneje se lahko zadevne storitve opišejo kot medpodjetniške storitve paketne pošte v domovini in tujini, storitve za lahko blago/paletirano blago v domovini in tujini ter storitve kurirske in hitre pošte v domovini in tujini.
In line with previous Commission decisions [3], a distinction can be made between the above services and therefore each of these services can be considered to constitute a separate market.
V skladu s prejšnjimi odločbami Komisije [3] je mogoče razlikovati med zgoraj navedenimi storitvami, zato je mogoče vsako od teh storitev obravnavati kot samostojen trg.
The Danish request thus concerns six different markets.
Zato se danski zahtevek nanaša na šest različnih trgov.
Pursuant to Article 6 of Directive 2004/17/EC, logistics services, such as courier and express services, are covered by the Directive to the extent that such services are provided by entities which also provide postal services within the meaning of its Article 6(2)(b).
V skladu s členom 6 Direktive 2004/17/ES se Direktiva nanaša na logistične storitve, na primer storitve kurirske in hitre pošte, če take storitve zagotavljajo subjekti, ki zagotavljajo tudi poštne storitve v smislu člena 6(2)(b) Direktive.
As a public enterprise within the meaning of Article 2(1)(b) of Directive 2004/17/EC exercising several of the activities mentioned in Article 6 of that Directive, Post Danmark, on whose behalf the request has been introduced, is a contracting entity for the purposes of Directive 2004/17/EC.
Kot javno podjetje v smislu člena 2(1)(b) Direktive 2004/17/ES, ki opravlja mnoge od dejavnosti, omenjene v členu 6 navedene direktive, je Post Danmark, v imenu katere je bil zahtevek vložen, naročnik v smislu iz Direktive 2004/17/ES.
According to the available information, it would seem to be the sole contracting entity operating in the markets concerned by the present decision, the other operators being private companies not operating on the basis of special or exclusive rights.
Glede na razpoložljive informacije se zdi, da je to edini naročnik, ki deluje na trgih, na katere se nanaša ta odločba, ostali subjekti pa so zasebna podjetja, ki ne delujejo na podlagi posebnih ali ekskluzivnih pravic.
These assessments, and any other contained in this Decision, are made solely for the purposes of Directive 2004/17/EC and are without prejudice to the application of the rules on competition.
Te ocene, pa tudi vse druge ocene iz te odločbe, se pripravljajo izključno zaradi izvajanja Direktive 2004/17/ES in ne posegajo v uporabo pravil o konkurenci.
Denmark has implemented and applied Directive 97/67/EC.
Danska je uvedla in uporabljala Direktivo 97/67/ES.
Consequently, and in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 30(3), access to the market should be deemed not to be restricted.
Zato in na podlagi prvega pododstavka člena 30(3) je treba dostop do trga šteti za prostega.
Direct exposure to competition should be evaluated on the basis of various indicators, none of which are, per se, decisive.
Neposredno izpostavljenost konkurenci bi bilo treba oceniti na podlagi različnih kazalcev, od katerih sam po sebi nobeden ni odločilen.
One parameter to take into account is the market shares of the main players on a given market and another is the degree of concentration.
En dejavnik, ki ga je treba upoštevati, so tržni deleži glavnih udeležencev na posameznem trgu, drugi pa je stopnja koncentracije.
Whether measured in terms of turnover or in terms of number of dispatches, Post Danmark’s market share on any of the six markets concerned varies, according to the information given, between less than 1 % [4] up to 35-40 % [5], which are acceptable levels, considering also the degree of concentration on these markets.
Glede prihodka in tudi glede števila pošiljk niha po dostavljenih informacijah tržni delež Post Danmark na vsakem od šestih zadevnih trgov med manj kot 1 % [4] in 35–40 % [5], kar so sprejemljive ravni, če se upošteva tudi stopnja koncentracije na teh trgih.
Post Danmark is the largest single operator on just two of these markets, respectively that for domestic parcel services and the one for domestic courier and express services [6].
Post Danmark je največji posamični subjekt na le dveh od teh trgov, na trgu za domače storitve paketne pošte in na trgu za domače storitve kurirske in hitre pošte [6].
On both of these markets, the combined market share of Post Danmark’s two biggest competitors is comparable to or greater than that of Post Danmark [7].
Na obeh navedenih trgih je skupni tržni delež dveh največjih konkurentov družbe Post Danmark primerljiv s tistim, ki ga ima Post Danmark [7], ali večji.
On those markets on which Post Danmark does not have the largest market share, the aggregate market shares of its two biggest competitors are several times greater [8] than Post Danmark’s market share.
Na tistih trgih, na katerih Post Danmark nima največjega tržnega deleža, je skupni tržni delež dveh njenih največjih konkurentov nekajkrat večji [8] kot njen.
These factors should therefore be taken as an indication of direct exposure to competition.
Te dejavnike je zato treba obravnavati kot znak neposredne izpostavljenosti konkurenci.
In view of the abovementioned indicators, the condition of direct exposure to competition laid down in Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC should be considered to be met in respect of the parcel and courier services in Denmark which are specified in Recital 4 [9].
Glede na omenjene kazalnike je treba pogoj neposredne izpostavljenosti konkurenci, določen v členu 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES, šteti za izpolnjenega glede storitev paketne in kurirske pošte na Danskem, ki so navedene v uvodni izjavi 4 [9].
As noted above in recital 7, the further condition of free access to the activity must be deemed to be met.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, v uvodni izjavi 7, je treba nadaljnji pogoj prostega dostopa do dejavnosti šteti za izpolnjenega.
Consequently, Directive 2004/17/EC should not apply when contracting entities award contracts intended to enable the parcel and courier services concerned by this request to be carried out in Denmark nor when they organise design contests for the pursuit of such an activity there.
Zato se Direktiva 2004/17/ES ne bi smela uporabljati, ko naročniki oddajajo naročila, katerih namen je omogočiti izvedbo storitev paketne in kurirske pošte iz zahtevka na Danskem, ali ko izvajajo natečaje za tamkajšnje opravljanje teh dejavnosti.
This Decision is based on the legal and factual situation as of November and December 2006 as it appears from the information submitted by the Kingdom of Denmark.
Ta odločba temelji na pravnih in dejanskih razmerah v novembru in decembru 2006, razvidnih iz informacij, ki jih je predložila Kraljevina Danska.
It may be revised, should significant changes in the legal or factual situation mean that the conditions for the applicability of Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC are no longer met.
Lahko se spremeni, če bi pomembne spremembe pravnih ali dejanskih razmer pomenile, da pogoji za uporabo člena 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES niso več izpolnjeni.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Advisory Committee for Public Contracts,
Ukrepi, določeni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Svetovalnega odbora za javna naročila –
Directive 2004/17/EC shall not apply to contracts awarded by contracting entities and intended to enable them to carry out the following parcel and courier services in Denmark:
Direktiva 2004/17/ES se ne uporablja za naročila, ki jih oddajo naročniki z namenom, da bi lahko opravljali naslednje storitve paketne in kurirske pošte na Danskem:
Domestic Business to Business (BtB) parcel services;
domače storitve medpodjetniške paketne pošte;
International Business to Business (BtB) parcel services;
mednarodne storitve medpodjetniške paketne pošte;
Domestic light goods/pallet goods services;
domače storitve za lahko blago/paletirano blago;
International light goods/pallet goods services;
mednarodne storitve za lahko blago/paletirano blago;
Domestic courier and express services; and
domače storitve kurirske in hitre pošte; ter
International courier and express services.
mednarodne storitve kurirske in hitre pošte.
Done at Brussels, 16 March 2007.
V Bruslju, 16. marca 2007
Directive last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1882/2003 (UL L 284, 31.10.2003, str. 1).
Commission Decision of 2 December 1991 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.102 — TNT/CANADA POST, DBP POSTDIENST, LA POSTE, PTT POST & SWEDEN POST) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89: points 19 et seq.; Commission Decision of 8 November 1996 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.843 — PTT Post/TNT/GD Express Worldwide) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89, points 10 et seq.; Commission Decision of 1 July 1999 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.1513 — DEUTSCHE POST/DANZAS/NEDLLOYD) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 points 8 et seq.; Commission Decision of 20 March 2001 relating to a proceeding under Article 82 of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/35 141 — Deutsche Post AG): point 26 et seq.; Commission Decision of 21 October 2002 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.2908 — DEUTSCHE POST/DHL (II)) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89: point 10 et seq.
Odločba Komisije z dne 2. decembra 1991 o združljivosti posamezne koncentracije s skupnim trgom (zadeva IV/M.102 – TNT/CANADA POST, DBP POSTDIENST, LA POSTE, PTT POST & SWEDEN POST) v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 4064/89, točka 19 in naslednje; Odločba Komisije z dne 8. novembra 1996 o združljivosti posamezne koncentracije s skupnim trgom (zadeva IV/M.843 – PTT Post/TNT/GD Express Worldwide) v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 4064/89, točka 10 in naslednje; Odločba Komisije z dne 1. julija 1999 o združljivosti posamezne koncentracije s skupnim trgom (zadeva IV/M.1513 – DEUTSCHE POST/DANZAS/NEDLLOYD) v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 4064/89, točka 8 in naslednje; Odločba Komisije z dne 20. marca 2001 glede postopka iz člena 82 Pogodbe ES (zadeva COMP/35 141 – Deutsche Post AG), točka 26 in naslednje; Odločba Komisije z dne 21. oktobra 2002 o združljivosti posamezne koncentracije s skupnim trgom (zadeva IV/M.2908 – DEUTSCHE POST/DHL (II)) v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 4064/89, točka 10 in naslednje.
On the market for international courier and express services in 2005.
Na trgu za mednarodne storitve kurirske in hitre pošte v letu 2005.
2005 market for domestic parcel services BtB (from and to Denmark).
Trg v letu 2005 za domače storitve medpodjetniške paketne pošte (iz Danske in na Dansko).
In 2005, Post Danmark’s market share in terms of turnover was 16-19 % for domestic courier and express services and 35-40 % in terms of turnover for domestic BtB parcel services.
V letu 2005 je tržni delež Post Danmark znašal 16–19 % po prihodku za domače storitve kurirske in hitre pošte in 35–40 % po prihodku za domače storitve medpodjetniške paketne pošte.
In 2005, the aggregate market shares of the two largest competitors on the market for domestic parcel services BtB amounted to 36-44 % in terms of turnover, whereas their combined market share, also in terms of turnover, was 23-29 % on the market for domestic courier and express services.
V letu 2005 je skupni tržni delež dveh največjih konkurentov na trgu za domače storitve medpodjetniške paketne pošte znašal 36–44 % po prihodku, njun skupni tržni delež na domačem trgu za storitve kurirske in hitre pošte pa 23–29 %, prav tako po prihodku.
E.g. on the market for domestic light goods/pallet goods, where Post Danmark has a market share in terms of turnover of 3-5 %, whereas the aggregate share of the two biggest operators amount to 69-83 % in terms of turnover.
Na primer, na trgu za domače storitve za lahko/paletirano blago ima Post Danmark po prihodku tržni delež 3–5 %, skupni delež obeh največjih subjektov pa znaša po prihodku 69–83 %.
The difference is even more marked on the market for international courier and express services, where Post Danmark’s share in terms of turnover was up to 1 % in 2005, when the aggregate share of the two largest actors on that market, also in terms of turnover, amounted to 65-80 %.
Ta razlika je še bolj izrazita na trgu mednarodnih storitev kurirske in hitre pošte, na katerem je v letu 2005 delež Post Danmark znašal največ 1 % po prihodku, skupni tržni delež dveh največjih udeležencev na tem trgu pa 65–80 %, prav tako po prihodku.
The services concerned are described as Business to Business (BtB) parcel services, domestic and international; light goods/pallet goods, domestic and international; as well as courier and express services, domestic and international.
Zadevne storitve se opišejo kot storitve medpodjetniške paketne pošte v domovini in tujini, storitve za lahko/paletirano blago v domovini in tujini ter storitve kurirske in hitre pošte v domovini in tujini.
laying down the network requirements for the Schengen Information System II (1st pillar)
o določitvi zahtev omrežja za Schengenski informacijski sistem II (1. steber)
(notified under document number C(2007) 845)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 845)
(Only the Bulgarian, Czech, Dutch, German, Estonian, Finnish, French, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish, and Swedish text is authentic)
(Besedila v bolgarskem, češkem, estonskem, finskem, francoskem, grškem, italijanskem, latvijskem, litovskem, madžarskem, malteškem, nemškem, nizozemskem, poljskem, portugalskem, romunskem, slovaškem, slovenskem, španskem in švedskem jeziku so edina verodostojna)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001 of 6 December 2001 on the development of the second generation of the Schengen Information System (SIS II) [1] and in particular Article 4(a) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2424/2001 z dne 6. decembra 2001 o razvoju druge generacije Schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) [1] in zlasti člena 4(a) Uredbe,
In order to develop SIS II it is necessary to set out technical specifications concerning the communication network, its components, and the specific network requirements.
Za razvoj SIS II je treba določiti tehnične specifikacije glede komunikacijskega omrežja, njegovih komponent in posebnih zahtev omrežja.
Appropriate arrangements, in particular as regards the elements of the uniform national interface located in Member States, should be put in place between the Commission and the Member States.
Komisija in države članice morajo sprejeti ustrezne dogovore zlasti glede elementov enotnega nacionalnega vmesnika v državah članicah.
This decision is without prejudice to the adoption in future of other Commission's Decisions related to the development of SIS II, in particular on the development of the security requirements.
Ta odločba ne preprečuje sprejetja drugih odločb Komisije v prihodnosti, povezanih z razvojem SIS II, zlasti glede razvoja varnostnih zahtev.
Both Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001 and Council Decision 2001/886/JHA [2] govern the development of the SIS II.
Tako Uredba (ES) št. 2424/2001 kot Sklep Sveta 2001/886/PNZ [2] urejata razvoj SIS II.
In order to ensure that there will be one single implementing process for the development of SIS II as a whole, the provisions of this Decision should mirror the provisions of the Commission's Decision laying down the network requirements for SIS II to be taken in application of Decision 2001/886/JHA.
Za zagotovitev, da bo obstajal en sam postopek izvajanja za razvoj SIS II kot celote, morajo določbe v tej odločbi odražati določbe Odločbe Komisije, ki določa zahteve omrežja za SIS II, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri uporabi Sklepa 2001/886/PNZ.
In accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [3], the United Kingdom has not taken part in the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001 and is not bound by it or subject to its application as it constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis.
V skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/365/ES z dne 29. maja 2000 o prošnji Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [3] Združeno kraljestvo ni sodelovalo pri sprejetju Uredbe (ES) št. 2424/2001, ki zato zanj ni zavezujoča, niti se v njem ne uporablja, saj predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda.
The United Kingdom is therefore not an addressee of this Commission decision.
Zato ta odločba ni naslovljena na Združeno kraljestvo.
In accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland's request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [4], Ireland has not taken part in the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001 and is not bound by it or subject to its application as it constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis.
V skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2002/192/ES z dne 28. februarja 2002 o prošnji Irske, da sodeluje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [4], Irska ni sodelovala pri sprejetju Uredbe (ES) št. 2424/2001, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča, niti se v njej ne uporablja, saj predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda.
Pursuant to Article 5 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark has decided to implement Council Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001 in Danish law.
Na podlagi člena 5 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, se je Danska odločila prenesti Uredbo (ES) št. 2424/2001 v svojo zakonodajo.
Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001 is thus binding upon Denmark in international law.
Uredba (ES) št. 2424/2001 je zato zanjo zavezujoča v mednarodnem pravu.
As regards Iceland and Norway, Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001 and Decision 2001/886/JHA constitute a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the association of those two States with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [5], which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point B of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the association of those two States with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [6].
Kar zadeva Islandijo in Norveško, Uredba (ES) št. 2424/2001 in Sklep 2001/886/PNZ pomenita razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško o pridružitvi obeh k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [5], kar sodi na področje iz točke B člena 1 Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES z dne 17. maja 1999 o nekaterih izvedbenih predpisih za uporabo Sporazuma, sklenjenega med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško, v zvezi s pridružitvijo teh dveh držav k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [6].