natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As regards the conclusions of the High Level group mentioned in point (61), they are irrelevant as they reflect the outcome of general political debate and do not constitute legally binding provisions.
Sklepne ugotovitve Skupine strokovnjakov na visoki ravni, ki so omenjene v točki (61), niso pomembne, saj izražajo rezultate splošne politične razprave in niso pravno zavezujoče določbe.
It should be noted, incidentally, that the solutions proposed by the group and quoted by Italy do not involve the granting of State aid.
Mimogrede je treba omeniti, da rešitve, ki jih je predlagala skupina in navedla Italija, ne vključujejo odobritve državne pomoči.
Since the aid cannot benefit of any of the derogations laid down in Article 87 of the EC Treaty, the second extension of the preferential tariff in favour of the Terni companies should be declared incompatible with the common market.
Ker se za pomoč ne more uporabiti nobeno od odstopanj iz člena 87 Pogodbe ES, je treba drugo podaljšanje veljavnosti ugodnejših cen podjetjem Terni razglasiti za nezdružljivo s skupnim trgom.
Pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 [42] laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the Treaty, in cases of unlawful aid which is not compatible with the common market, effective competition should be restored and the aid, including interest, needs to be recovered without delay.
Na podlagi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 [42] o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES je treba v primeru nezakonite pomoči, ki ni združljiva s skupnim trgom, ponovno vzpostaviti učinkovito konkurenco in pomoč, vključno z obrestmi, vrniti brez odlašanja.
It is settled case-law that, when aid has been granted without prior notification pursuant to Article 88(3) of the Treaty, the recipient of the aid cannot have at that time a legitimate expectation that its grant is lawful [43].
V skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso prejemnik pomoči ne more imeti upravičenega pričakovanja glede zakonitosti dodelitve te pomoči, [43] če se pomoč izvaja brez predhodne priglasitve Komisiji na podlagi člena 88(3) Pogodbe.
A diligent businessman should normally be able to determine whether the notification procedure has been followed and the aid is lawful.
Vesten poslovnež naj bi bil sposoben ugotoviti, ali se je ravnalo v skladu s postopkom uradnega obvestila in ali je pomoč zakonita.
However, a recipient of unlawfully granted aid is not precluded from relying on exceptional circumstances on the basis of which it had legitimately assumed the aid to be lawful and thus declining to refund that aid [44].
Vendar pa se prejemniku nezakonito dodeljene pomoči ne prepreči, da se zanaša na izjemne okoliščine, na podlagi katerih je upravičeno domneval, da je pomoč zakonita, in je zato zavrnil vračilo te pomoči.
The Commission has examined whether the exceptional circumstances alleged by the Terni companies in paragraph (47) could have led them to entertain such legitimate expectations.
Komisija je preučila, ali bi zaradi izjemnih okoliščin, ki jih podjetja Terni navajajo v odstavku (47), podjetja lahko imela taka upravičena pričakovanja.
In substance, the beneficiaries plead that Italy had given them assurances about the non-aid character of the measure, and that the Commission had not called the measure into question, either when it was first extended, or when information on the second extension was submitted.
Prejemnice pomoči se zagovarjajo na zagotovilo Italije, da ukrep ni pomoč, in dejstvo, da Komisija ni dvomila o ukrepu, niti ko je bil podaljšan prvič niti ko je Italija predložila informacije o drugem podaljšanju.
As regards the first claim, it will suffice to recall that, according to settled case-law, the existence of legitimate expectations cannot depend on the behaviour of the Member State granting the aid.
V zvezi s prvo trditvijo zadostuje, če spomnimo, da v skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso obstoj upravičenih pričakovanj ne more biti odvisen od vedenja države članice, ki odobri pomoč.
The CFI has ruled, in particular, that ‘incorrect information given by a Member State about the legality of a measure cannot in any circumstances give rise to legitimate expectations, especially where the Commission has not even been informed of that information’ [45]
Sodišče prve stopnje je odločilo zlasti, da „napačne informacije, ki jih država članica posreduje o zakonitosti ukrepa, nikakor ne morejo biti vzrok za upravičena pričakovanja, še posebno če Komisija o teh informacijah sploh ni bila obveščena“ [45].
Only the behaviour of the Community administration may thus give rise to legitimate expectations.
Vzrok za upravičena pričakovanja je zato lahko samo vedenje uprave Skupnosti.
In particular, the Court has ruled that ‘a person may not plead infringement of that principle unless he has been given precise assurances (emphasis added) by the Community administration’ [46].
Zlasti je Sodišče odločilo, da „se oseba ne more sklicevati na kršitev tega načela, razen če ji je uprava Skupnosti posredovala natančna zagotovila (poudarek je dodan)“ [46].
The Terni companies claim that the measure was not called into question in 1991, when the Commission approved Law 9/1991.
Podjetja Terni trdijo, da Komisija leta 1991, ko je odobrila zakon št. 9/1991, ni dvomila o ukrepu.
It should be pointed out that the 1991 Commission Decision covers only the measure laid down in Law 9/1991, so that the approval of that measure cannot give rise to legitimate expectations concerning the lawfulness or compatibility of the new aid measure introduced by Law 80/2005.
Poudariti je treba, da se odločba Komisije iz leta 1991 nanaša samo na ukrep, ki ga določa zakon št. 9/1991, zato odobritev tega ukrepa ne more biti vzrok za upravičena pričakovanja glede zakonitosti ali združljivosti novega ukrepa pomoči, ki je bil uveden z zakonom št. 80/2005.
Even if the Commission had explicitly stated that the 1991 measure did not constitute aid, quod non, the beneficiaries could not assume that the 2005 measure would also automatically qualify as non-aid, since there are many circumstances that may transform a non-aid measure into a State aid.
Tudi če bi Komisija izrecno izjavila, da ukrep iz leta 1991 ni bil pomoč, kar ne velja, prejemnice pomoči ne bi mogle sklepati, da bi se tudi ukrep iz leta 2005 samodejno obravnaval, kot da ni pomoč, saj se lahko ukrep, ki ni pomoč, v državno pomoč spremeni zaradi številnih okoliščin.
Moreover, the wording of the Commission Decision as notified to Italy, which declares compatible the aid measures contained in Law 9/1991 and 10/1991 would, if anything, suggest the opposite, that the Terni measure did constitute aid.
Poleg tega bi se na podlagi besedila odločbe Komisije, o kateri je bila uradno obveščena Italija, ki ukrepe pomoči iz zakonov št. 9/1991 in št. 10/1991 razglaša za združljive, lahko sklepalo ravno nasprotno, namreč da je bil ukrep Terni pomoč.
Therefore, the Commission Decision could not possibly have given the beneficiaries precise assurances as to the non-aid character of the tariff, but — at best — a legitimate expectation that the 1991 extension of the tariff was compatible.
Zato odločitev Komisije prejemnicam pomoči ni mogla dati natančnih zagotovil o tem, da cena nima značaja pomoči, ampak so na podlagi nje lahko v najboljšem primeru upravičeno pričakovale, da je bilo podaljšanje veljavnosti cene iz leta 1991 združljivo.
As regards the Commission’s alleged failure to act diligently when it received information on the second extension of the tariff, this claim is manifestly unfounded.
Trditev, da Komisija domnevno ni ravnala vestno, ko je prejela informacije o drugem podaljšanju veljavnosti cene, je očitno neutemeljena.
The formal investigation procedure was opened by the Commission in July 2006.
Formalni postopek preiskave je Komisija sprožila julija 2006.
Considering the short time elapsed between the submission of information and action by the Commission, it is manifest that the Commission acted diligently.
Glede na kratek čas, ki je pretekel med predložitvijo informacij in ukrepanjem Komisije, je očitno, da je Komisija ravnala vestno.
In the light of the above considerations, the Commission has concluded that there are no extraordinary circumstances which could have led the Terni companies to entertain legitimate expectations as to the lawfulness of the contested measure.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je Komisija sklenila, da ni bilo izjemnih okoliščin, zaradi katerih bi podjetja Terni lahko imela upravičena pričakovanja glede zakonitosti spornega ukrepa.
All amounts of incompatible aid received by ThyssenKrupp, Cementir and Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche pursuant to Article 11(11) of Law 80/2005 and which cover the period starting on 1 January 2005 (see paragraph (26)) shall be recovered, with interest, in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [47].
Vsi zneski nezdružljive pomoči, ki so jih prejela podjetja ThyssenKrupp, Cementir in Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche na podlagi člena 11(11) zakona št. 80/2005 in ki so bili izplačani v obdobju od 1. januarja 2005 (glej odstavek (26)), se z obrestmi vrnejo v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES [47].
It should be recalled, in this context, that the purpose of recovery is to restore the beneficiary’s competitive situation prevailing before the grant of the incompatible aid.
V zvezi s tem je treba spomniti na to, da je namen vračila ponovno vzpostaviti konkurenčni položaj prejemnika pomoči, ki ga je imel pred odobritvijo nezdružljive pomoči.
In establishing what was the competitive situation of the Terni companies before the introduction of Law 80/2005, account should be taken of the existence of the existing aid measure laid down in Law 9/1991, which was cleared under the State aid rules until 2007.
Pri ugotavljanju konkurenčnega položaja podjetij Terni pred sprejetjem zakona št. 80/2005 je treba upoštevati ukrep pomoči, ki je bil določen v zakonu št. 9/1991 in je bil v skladu s pravili o državni pomoči odobren do leta 2007.
Therefore, the Commission considers that the residual amounts of aid to which the beneficiaries would have been entitled under Law 9/1991 in 2005, 2006 and 2007 if Law 80/2005 had not been implemented may be deducted from the sums to be recovered, if Italy considers that the beneficiaries are entitled to them under national law.
Zato Komisija meni, da se preostali zneski pomoči, do katerih bi bile prejemnice pomoči v letih 2005, 2006 in 2007 upravičene na podlagi zakona št. 9/1991, če ne bi bil sprejet zakon št. 80/2005, lahko odštejejo od vsote, ki jo morajo vrniti, če Italija meni, da so prejemnice pomoči v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo upravičene do teh zneskov pomoči.
The Commission finds that Italy has unlawfully implemented, in breach of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty, the provision of Article 11, paragraph 11 of Decreto-legge 80/05, converted into Law 80/2005, providing for the modification and extension in time until 2010 of the preferential electricity tariff applicable to the three Terni companies.
Komisija je sklenila, da je Italija s kršitvijo člena 88(3) Pogodbe ES nezakonito izvajala določbo odstavka 11 člena 11 zakonskega odloka (Decreto-legge) št. 80/05, ki je bil spremenjen v zakon št. 80/2005, ki določa spremembo in podaljšanje veljavnosti ugodnejših cen električne energije, ki veljajo za tri podjetja Terni, do leta 2010.
The Commission considers that such measure, which constitutes pure operating aid, is not eligible for any derogation under the EC treaty, and is therefore incompatible with the common market.
Komisija meni, da tak ukrep, ki je čista pomoč za tekoče poslovanje, ne izpolnjuje pogojev za nobeno odstopanje po Pogodbi ES, in zato ni združljiv s skupnim trgom.
Therefore, the parts of the above measure that have not yet been granted or paid must not be implemented.
Zato se deli omenjenega ukrepa, ki še niso bili odobreni ali plačani, ne smejo izplačati.
The aid already paid has to be recovered.
Že izplačano pomoč je treba vrniti.
The amounts to which the beneficiaries would have been entitled in 2005, 2006 and 2007 under Law 9/1991 may be deducted from the total amount to be recovered,
Zneski, do katerih bi bile prejemnice pomoči upravičene v letih 2005, 2006 in 2007 na podlagi zakona št. 9/1991, se lahko odštejejo od skupnega zneska, ki ga je treba vrniti –
The State aid which Italy has implemented in favour of ThyssenKrupp, Cementir and Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč Italije za podjetja ThyssenKrupp, Cementir in Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
The State aid which Italy has granted but not yet paid out to ThyssenKrupp, Cementir and Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche is also incompatible with the common market and may not therefore be implemented.
Državna pomoč, ki jo je Italija odobrila podjetjem ThyssenKrupp, Cementir in Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche, vendar jim je še ni izplačala, je prav tako nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom in se zato ne sme izvajati.
Italy shall recover from the beneficiaries the aid referred to in Article 1(1).
Italija bo od prejemnic pomoči izterjala vračilo pomoči iz člena 1(1).
The sums to be recovered shall include interest for the entire period running from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiaries until the date of their recovery.
Vsote, ki jih je treba vrniti, morajo vsebovati obresti za celotno obdobje od datuma, ko so bile dane na razpolago prejemnicam pomoči, do datuma vračila.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in conformity with Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Obresti se v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 794/2004 izračunajo na podlagi obrestnoobrestnega računa.
Italy shall take all necessary measures to recover from the beneficiary the illegal and incompatible aid referred to in Article 1.
Italija sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe, da od prejemnic pomoči izterja nezakonito in nezdružljivo pomoč iz člena 1.
Recovery shall take place without delay and in accordance with the procedures under national law provided that they allow the immediate and effective execution of the decision.
Vračilo se izvede nemudoma in skladno s postopki, določenimi v nacionalni zakonodaji zadevne države članice, če omogočajo takojšnjo in učinkovito izvajanje odločbe Komisije.
Italy shall ensure that the present decision is implemented within four months of the date of notification.
Italija zagotavlja, da bo to odločbo izvedla v štirih mesecih od datuma priglasitve.
Italy shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national proceedings to implement this decision until these proceedings have been completed.
Italija bo Komisijo obveščala o napredovanju nacionalnih postopkov za izvajanje te odločbe, dokler ne bodo končani.
Within two months of notification of this decision, Italy shall submit information specifying the total amounts (principal and interest) to be recovered from the beneficiaries and a detailed description of the measures already taken or planned to comply with the present decision.
V dveh mesecih od priglasitve te odločbe bo Italija predložila informacije o skupnih zneskih (glavnica in obresti), ki jih morajo vrniti prejemnice pomoči, in podroben opis že sprejetih ali načrtovanih ukrepov za uskladitev s to odločbo.
By the same deadline, it shall send to the Commission all the documents demonstrating that the beneficiaries have been ordered to repay the aid.
V istem roku bo Italija Komisiji poslala vso dokumentacijo, ki dokazuje, da je prejemnicam pomoči odredila vračilo pomoči.
After the period of two months referred to in paragraph 2, Italy shall submit, on a simple request by the Commission, a report on the measures already taken or planned to comply with this decision.
Po dveh mesecih, predpisanih v odstavku 2, bo Italija na jasno zahtevo Komisije predložila poročilo o že sprejetih ali načrtovanih ukrepih za uskladitev s to odločbo.
This report shall also provide detailed information on the amounts of aid and interest already recovered from the beneficiaries.
Poročilo mora vsebovati tudi podrobne informacije o zneskih pomoči in obrestih, ki so jih prejemnice pomoči že vrnile.
Done at Brussels, 20 November 2007.
V Bruslju, dne 20. novembra 2007
OJ C 214 of 6.9.2006, p. 5.
UL C 214, 6.9.2006, str. 5.
Article 4, paragraph 6, first indent, letters (a) and (b) of Law 1643/62.
Črki (a) in (b) prve alinee odstavka 6 člena 4 zakona št. 1643/62.
As concessions expire, they should be awarded again on the basis of a transparent selection procedure.
Po izteku veljavnosti koncesij se te ponovno dodelijo na podlagi preglednega izbirnega postopka.
State aid NN 52/1991, letter SG (91) D/15502.
Državna pomoč NN 52/1991, dopis SG (91) D/15502.
Article 1, paragraph 285 of Law 266/2005.
Odstavek 285 člena 1 zakona št. 266/2005.
Delibera AEEG No 228/01.
Delibera AEEG št. 228/01.
Delibera AEEG No 148/04.
Delibera AEEG št. 148/04.
OJ L 227, 19.8.1983, p. 24.
UL L 227, 19.8.1983, str. 24.
Sentence of the ECJ in Terni SpA and Italsider v. Cassa Conguaglio per il settore elettrico, reference for a preliminary ruling, Case C 99/92, [1994] ECR p. I-00541.
Sodba SES v Zadevi Terni SpA in Italsider proti Cassa Conguaglio per il settore elettrico, predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, Zadeva C-99/92, [1994] Recueil, str. I-00541.
Commission Decision SEC/1999/687 of 11 May 1999 in Case C 49/98, Measures in favour of employment, Articles 15 and 26 of Law 196/97, OJ L 42, 15.2.2000, p. 1-18.
Odločba Komisije SEC/1999/687 z dne 11. maja 1999 v Zadevi C-49/98, Ukrepi za zaposlovanje, člena 15 in 26 zakona št. 196/97, UL L 42, 15.2.2000, str. 1–18.
Sentence of the ECJ in Deggendorf v. Commission, Case C-355/95 [1997] ECR p. I-02549.
Sodba SES v Zadevi Deggendorf proti Komisiji, Zadeva C-355/95, [1997] Recueil, str. I-02549.
Communication of 16.12.2005 of the Ministry for productive activities to the AEEG.
Obvestilo Ministrstva za proizvodne dejavnosti, naslovljeno na AEEG, z dne 16.12.2005.
Delibera AEEG 190/2006.
Delibera AEEG št. 190/2006.
Notably the following judgments: A.D.B.H.U., Case C 240/83 of 7.2.1985 ECR (1985) p 00531, Asteris, joint cases 106-120/87 of 27.9.1988, ECR (1988) p. 05515 Altmark, Case C-280/00 of 24/7/2003, (ECR 2003) p. I-07747; Ferring, Case C 53/00 of 22.11.2001, ECR (2001) p. I-09067.
Predvsem naslednje sodbe: A.D.B.H.U., Zadeva C-240/83 z dne 7.2.1985, Recueil (1985), str. 00531, Asteris, združene zadeve 106-120/87 z dne 27.9.1988, Recueil (1988), str. 05515, Altmark, Zadeva C-280/00 z dne 24.7.2003, (Recueil 2003), str. I-07747; Ferring, Zadeva C-53/00 z dne 22.11.2001, Recueil (2001), str. I-09067.
First Report of the High Level Group ‘Contributing to an integrated approach on competitiveness, energy and the environment policies — functioning of the energy market, access to energy, energy efficiency and the EU Emission Trading Scheme’ of 2 June 2006.
Prvo poročilo Skupine strokovnjakov na visoki ravni „Contributing to an integrated approach on competitiveness, energy and the environment policies – functioning of the energy market, access to energy, energy efficiency and the EU Emission Trading Scheme“ [Prispevek k celostnemu pristopu k politikam o konkurenčnosti, energiji in okolju – delovanje energetskega trga, dostop do energije, učinkovitost energije in shema o trgovanju z emisijami EU] z dne 2. junija 2006.
Judgement of the ECJ in Pearle and others, (Case C-345/02 [2004] ECR I-7139 and Preussen-Elektra, Case C-379/98 [2001] ECR I-02099.
Sodba SES v Zadevi Pearle in drugi, Zadeva C-345/02, [2004] Recueil I-7139, in Preussen-Elektra, Zadeva C-379/98, [2001] Recueil I-02099.
The mechanism for challenging the amount of compensation was laid down in Article 5, paragraph 5 of the nationalization law.
Mehanizem, na podlagi katerega je mogoče ugovarjati znesku nadomestila, je bil določen v odstavku 5 člena 5 zakona o nacionalizaciji.
It should be noted that, under Italian law, when hydro-power concessions expire, the hydropower company loses ownership rights on part of its assets, notably certain engineering works, which automatically revert to the State.
Pripomniti je treba, da po italijanski zakonodaji hidroelektrarne, ko jim poteče koncesija, izgubijo lastninsko pravico na delu svoje infrastrukture, zlasti na nekaterih strojnih obratih, ki samodejno spet postanejo državna last.
See judgments of the ECJ in Steinike & Weinlig, C-78/76, [1977] ECR p. 595 and in French Government v. Commission, Case C-47/69 [1970] ECR p. 00487.
Glej sodbe SES v Zadevi Steinike & Weinlig, C-78/76, [1977] Recueil, str. 595, in v Zadevi Francoska vlada proti Komisiji, Zadeva C-47/69, [1970] Recueil, str. 00487.
Judgment of the ECJ in Pearle and others v. Commission, Case C-345/02 [2004] ECR I-7139.
Sodba SES v Zadevi Pearle in drugi proti Komisiji, Zadeva C-345/02, [2004] Recueil I-7139.
Cementir belongs to the Caltagirone Group, operates a number of plants in Italy, some of which are active in the export business.
Podjetje Cementir je del skupine Caltagirone Group, ki upravlja številne elektrarne v Italiji, od katerih so nekatere dejavni izvozniki.
The company produces a variety of cement and lime products and controls a cement-producer in Turkey which exports to the EU.
Podjetje izdeluje različne izdelke iz cementa in apna ter nadzira proizvajalca cementa v Turčiji, ki svoje izdelke izvaža v EU.
Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche belongs to the Norsk Hydro group, active in the production of chemical and mineral fertilizers, oil and gas and petrochemicals.
Podjetje Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche je del skupine Norsk Hydro group, ki proizvaja umetna in mineralna gnojila, nafto, plin in petrokemične proizvode.
ThyssenKrupp is a global conglomerate active mainly, but not only, in steel production.
Podjetje ThyssenKrupp je globalni koncern, ki je večinoma dejaven v proizvodnji jekla, vendar pa to ni edino njegovo področje.
Judgment of the ECJ France Republic v. Commission, Case C 102/87, [1988] ECR p. 04067.
Sodba SES v Zadevi Republika Francija proti Komisiji, Zadeva C-102/87, [1988] Recueil, str. 04067.
Commission Decision of 30 November 1994 (Cases IV/33.322 — cement), OJ L 343/1994, p. 1-158.
Odločba Komisije z dne 30. novembra 1994 (Zadeve IV/33.322 – cement), UL L 343/1994, str. 1–158.
Decision IV/M.832 of 25.10.1996 Norsk Hydro/Enichem Agricoltura — Terni (II).
Odločba IV/M.832 z dne 25.10.1996 v Zadevi Norsk Hydro/Enichem Agricoltura – Terni (II).
See, inter alia, Decision IV/M.925 Krupp-Hoesch/Thyssen of 11 August 1997.
Glej med drugim Odločbo IV/M.925 v Zadevi Krupp-Hoesch/Thyssen z dne 11. avgusta 1997.
See, inter alia, the judgment of the ECJ in Philip Morris/Commission, (Case 730/79, ECR [1980] p. 02671, paragraph 11) and judgment of the ECJ in Air Liquide Industries/Ville de Seraing et Province de Liège (Joint Cases C 393/04 and C 41/05, [2006] ECR p. I-05293).
Glej med drugim sodbo SES v Zadevi Philip Morris proti Komisiji, (Zadeva 730/79, Recueil [1980], str. 02671, odstavek 11) in sodbo SES v Zadevi Air Liquide Industries proti Ville de Seraing et Province de Liège (združeni zadevi C-393/04 in C-41/05, [2006] ZOdl., str. I-05293).
See, for example, on this point, the judgment of the CFI in Territorio Historico de Alava — Diputacion Foral de Alava, Joint Cases T-127/99 and T-148/99, [2002] ECR II-012575, paragraphs 173-175.
V zvezi s tem glej na primer sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje v Zadevi Territorio Historico de Alava – Diputacion Foral de Alava, združeni zadevi T-127/99 in T-148/99, [2002] Recueil II-012575, odstavki 173–175.
Joined Cases C 15/98 and C 105/99, Italy and Sardegna Lines v. Commission ECR [2000] I-8855, paragraph 74 of the Opinion.
Združeni zadevi C 15/98 in C 105/99, Italija in Sardegna Lines proti Komisiji, Recueil [2000] I-8855, odstavek 74 stališča.
Judgment of the CFI in Government of Gibraltar v. Commission, Joint Cases T 195-01 and T 207/01 [ECR 2002 ] p. II-02309.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje v Zadevi Vlada Gibraltarja proti Komisiji, združeni zadevi T 195-01 in T 2017/01, [Recueil 2002] str. II-02309.