natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In regard to profit, in the absence of profitable transactions of the company and lack of possibility of using profits for the same general category of products of other Chinese exporting producers, a profit margin of 5 % was applied for the construction of normal value in accordance with Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Kar zadeva dobiček, je bila – v odsotnosti donosnih poslov družbe in ob nezmožnosti uporabe dobičkov za isto splošno kategorijo izdelkov drugega kitajskega proizvajalca izvoznika – za konstruiranje normalne vrednosti v skladu s členom 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe uporabljena stopnja dobička 5 %.
This margin is in line with that used in constructing normal value for the exporting producer in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia as stated in recital 45 of the provisional Regulation.
Ta stopnja je skladna s tisto, ki se uporablja za konstruiranje normalne vrednosti za proizvajalca izvoznika v Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 45 začasne uredbe.
No information was provided that this amount of profit would exceed the profit normally realised by other exporters or producers on sales of products of the same general category on the Chinese market.
Posredovanih ni bilo nobenih informacij, da bi tak znesek dobička presegal dobiček, ki ga običajno realizirajo drugi izvozniki ali proizvajalci s prodajo izdelkov iste splošne kategorije na kitajskem trgu.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, one of the Egyptian exporting producers claimed that, when determining the normal value based on constructed value, a lower profit margin should be used in line with that used for the exporting producer in former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov je eden od egiptovskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov zahteval, da se pri določanju normalne vrednosti na osnovi konstruirane vrednosti uporabi nižja stopnja dobička, skladna s tisto, ki se uporablja za proizvajalca izvoznika v Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji.
It should be noted that constructed normal values were established in line with the methodology set out in recitals 43 to 45 of the provisional Regulation.
Upoštevati je treba, da so bile konstruirane normalne vrednosti določene skladno z metodologijo iz uvodnih izjav 43 do 45 začasne uredbe.
The profit margin used reflects the market situation in Egypt and has been applied in accordance with the requirements of the introductory words of Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation.
Uporabljena stopnja dobička odraža razmere na trgu v Egiptu in je bila uporabljena v skladu z zahtevami iz uvodnega stavka člena 2(6) osnovne uredbe.
Hence, the margin applied was based on the exporting producer’s own actual profitable domestic sales, in the ordinary course of trade, of the like product during the IP.
Zato je bila uporabljena stopnja, osnovana na lastni dejanski dobičkonosni domači prodaji podobnega izdelka s strani proizvajalca izvoznika, v običajnem poteku trgovine, v obdobju preiskave.
The basic Regulation does not provide that this profit level be substituted by another level as suggested by the company concerned.
Osnovna uredba ne predvideva nadomestitve te stopnje dobička z drugačno stopnjo, kot to predlaga zadevna družba.
Consequently, this claim had to be rejected.
Zato je bilo treba ta zahtevek zavrniti.
In the absence of any comments concerning the determination of normal value for Kazakhstan, recital 51 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z določitvijo normalne vrednosti za Kazahstan ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se uvodna izjava 51 začasne uredbe potrdi.
In the absence of any comments concerning the determination of normal value for the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, recital 52 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z določitvijo normalne vrednosti za Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se uvodna izjava 52 začasne uredbe potrdi.
Following the provisional disclosure, one Russian exporting producer claimed that the exchange rates applied in the calculation of normal value did not correspond to the actual timing of sales.
Po začasnem razkritju je en ruski proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da menjalni tečaji, ki se uporabljajo pri izračunu normalne vrednosti, ne ustrezajo dejanskemu časovnemu okviru prodaje.
After verification it was found that the claim was justified, and the calculation was amended accordingly.
Po preveritvi je bilo ugotovljeno, da je trditev utemeljena, in izračun je bil ustrezno spremenjen.
Following the provisional disclosure, one Russian exporting producer contested the adjustment of its energy costs by arguing that the prices of energy set by the Russian authorities are not compulsory but rather indicative.
Po začasnem razkritju je en ruski proizvajalec izvoznik izpodbijal prilagoditev svojih stroškov energije in utemeljeval, da cene energije, ki so jih določili ruski pristojni organi, niso obvezne, temveč okvirne.
This was demonstrated by the company’s claim that they paid above the recommended price and that its electricity supplier was profitable.
To so dokazovali s trditvijo družbe, da plačuje ceno, višjo od priporočene, in da je njen dobavitelj električne energije dobičkonosen.
The company also argued that the electricity supplier is one of the few independent electricity suppliers in Russia that does not belong to the United Electricity System of Russia and therefore this supplier is not involved in any cross-subsidisation practices highlighted in the OECD report which is referred to in the provisional Regulation.
Poleg tega je družba trdila, da je dobavitelj električne energije eden redkih neodvisnih dobaviteljev električne energije v Rusiji, ki ni del Združenega elektroenergetskega sistema Rusije, zaradi česar ta dobavitelj tudi ni vključen v kakršne koli prakse navzkrižnega subvencioniranja, izpostavljene v poročilu OECD, ki je omenjen v začasni uredbi.
In the light of the substantiated arguments submitted by the company concerning electricity, it is considered that an energy cost adjustment should not be made in the definitive calculation of its normal value.
Glede na utemeljene argumente, ki jih je predložila družba v zvezi z električno energijo, prevladuje mnenje, da se v dokončnem izračunu njene normalne vrednosti ne izvede prilagoditve stroškov energije.
Following the provisional disclosure, one Chinese exporting producer pointed out that in calculating its export price, the exchange rate that was applied between the RMB and the euro was that at the end of the IP, which overstated the value of the exchange rate.
Po začasnem razkritju je en kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik opozoril, da je pri izračunu njegove izvozne cene menjalni tečaj, uporabljen med RMB in evrom, tečaj na koncu obdobja preiskave, kar precenjuje vrednost menjalnega tečaja.
The company suggested using the IP average exchange rate instead.
Družba je predlagala, da se namesto tega uporabi povprečni menjalni tečaj obdobja preiskave.
Having examined this claim, in the definitive calculation, it has been decided that the average exchange rate of the month during which the actual sale transactions took place should be used.
Po preučitvi te trditve je bilo sklenjeno, da se v dokončnem izračunu uporabi povprečni menjalni tečaj meseca, v katerem so bile izvedene dejanske prodajne transakcije.
In the absence of any other comments concerning Chinese export prices, recitals 55 to 56 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s kitajskimi izvoznimi cenami ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se uvodni izjavi 55 in 56 začasne uredbe potrdita.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, one of the Egyptian exporting producers claimed that there were some errors in the exchange rates applied for export transactions to the Community and also in the determination of the weighted average net export value for some types of the product concerned.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov je eden od egiptovskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov zatrjeval, da je v menjalnih tečajih, ki se uporabljajo za izvozne transakcije pri izvozu v Skupnost, pa tudi pri določitvi tehtane povprečne neto vrednosti izvoza za nekatere vrste zadevnega izdelka nekaj napak.
It was found that these claims were justified and the export prices were revised accordingly.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so te trditve utemeljene, in izvozne cene so bile ustrezno popravljene.
In the absence of any comments concerning Kazakh export prices, recital 58 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s kazahstanskimi izvoznimi cenami ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se uvodna izjava 58 začasne uredbe potrdi.
In the absence of any comments concerning export prices for the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, recital 59 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z izvoznimi cenami za Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se uvodna izjava 59 začasne uredbe potrdi.
Following the provisional disclosure, one Russian exporting producer claimed that the profit margin of its related importer in the EC used in constructing the export price in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation was overstated.
Po začasnem razkritju je en ruski proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da je stopnja dobička njegovega povezanega uvoznika v ES, ki se uporablja pri konstruiranju izvozne cene v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe, precenjena.
It is recalled that the profit used in constructing the export price at the provisional stage was that of the related importer concerned.
Upošteva se, da je bil dobiček, ki se je uporabljal pri konstruiranju izvozne cene v začasni fazi, dobiček zadevnega povezanega uvoznika.
However, in line with the institutions’ consistent practice, the amount of profit to be used should be based on that achieved by unrelated importers.
Vendar pa bi, skladno z običajno prakso institucij, uporabljeni znesek dobička moral temeljiti na dobičku, ki ga dosežejo nepovezani uvozniki.
In these circumstances, the profit margin used at the provisional stage had to be corrected.
V teh okoliščinah je bilo treba stopnjo dobička, ki se uporablja v začasni fazi, popraviti.
The effect of this change was to slightly increase the profit used contrary to the claim of the company that the profit level was overstated.
Namen te spremembe je bil rahlo povečanje uporabljenega dobička, v nasprotju s trditvijo družbe, da je stopnja dobička precenjena.
Following the provisional disclosure, another Russian exporting producer claimed that the provisional calculation of its export price was incorrect as the SG&A and profit of its related trading company based in the British Virgin Islands, as well as transport costs, were deducted from the price to the first independent customer to arrive at ex-factory level.
Po začasnem razkritju je neki drugi ruski proizvajalec izvoznik zatrjeval, da je začasni izračun njegove izvozne cene napačen, saj so bili PSA in dobiček njegove povezane trgovske družbe s sedežem na Britanskih Deviških otokih in tudi prevozni stroški odbiti od cene za prvo prispelo neodvisno stranko na stopnji franko tovarna.
The company claimed that the trading company is, in fact, the sales department of the manufacturer.
Družba je trdila, da je ta trgovska družba pravzaprav prodajna služba proizvajalca.
Both companies are under common control and perform complementary tasks which would normally fall under the responsibility of a single management structure.
Obe družbi sta pod skupnim nadzorom in opravljata dopolnilne naloge, ki bi bile navadno v pristojnosti enotne upravljavske strukture.
Additionally, it was stressed that the trading company does not handle any other product.
Poleg tega je bilo poudarjeno, da ta trgovska družba ne prodaja nobenega drugega izdelka.
On this basis, the company claimed that excessive deductions were made in establishing the ex-factory price.
Na tej podlagi je družba zatrjevala, da so bili pri določanju cene franko tovarna opravljeni preveliki odbitki.
In this regard, it was found that invoices were issued by the trading company to customers in the Community and payments were received by the trading company from the customers in the Community.
V tej zvezi je bilo ugotovljeno, da je trgovska družba izdajala račune strankam v Skupnosti in plačila je prejemala od strank v Skupnosti.
Furthermore, it is to be noted that the sales made by the related trader included a markup.
Ob tem je treba opozoriti, da je prodaja povezanega trgovca vsebovala pribitek.
Also, the financial accounts of the trader showed that it bore selling, general and administrative costs.
Poleg tega so finančna poročila trgovca pokazala, da je slednji kril prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške.
The company did not demonstrate that these costs were not incurred in selling, inter alia, the product concerned to the Community.
Družba ni dokazala, da ti stroški niso nastali s prodajo, med drugim, zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost.
On this basis, the company’s claim was rejected.
Na tej podlagi je bila trditev družbe zavrnjena.
Similar to the adjustment mentioned in the preceding recital concerning the level of profit used in constructing the export price for the other Russian exporting producer, the profit margin used at the provisional stage had to be corrected.
Podobno kot prilagoditev, omenjeno v predhodni uvodni izjavi, v zvezi s stopnjo dobička, uporabljeno pri konstruiranju izvozne cene za drugega ruskega proizvajalca izvoznika, je bilo treba popraviti tudi stopnjo dobička, uporabljeno v začasni fazi.
The effect of this change was to slightly reduce the profit used.
Namen te spremembe je bil rahlo zmanjšanje uporabljenega dobička.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, one of the Egyptian exporting producers argued that it should be granted an allowance for the payment of customs duties on imported raw materials used in producing the product concerned that was sold on the domestic market.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov je eden od egiptovskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov utemeljeval, da bi moral dobiti nadomestilo za plačilo carin na uvožene surovine, ki se uporabljajo v proizvodnji zadevnega izdelka, prodanega na notranjem trgu.
In reply to this, it should be recalled that pursuant to Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation, an adjustment shall be made for an amount corresponding to any import charges or indirect taxes borne by the like product and by materials physically incorporated therein, when intended for consumption in the exporting country and not collected or refunded in respect of the product concerned exported to the EC.
V odgovor na to je treba spomniti, da se v skladu s členom 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe opravi prilagoditev za znesek, ustrezen morebitnim uvoznim dajatvam ali posrednim davkom, ki se krijejo s podobnim izdelkom in materiali, ki so v njem fizično vgrajeni, kadar so namenjeni za porabo v državi izvoznici in niso pobrani ali povrnjeni v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom, izvoženim v ES.
The claim for an allowance for import charges for one raw material used for the production of the product concerned sold on the domestic market was accepted, since it was demonstrated that appropriate customs duties were paid for the raw material imported and physically incorporated in the product concerned sold in Egypt.
Zahtevek za nadomestilo za uvozne dajatve za eno surovino, uporabljano za proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka, ki se prodaja na notranjem trgu, je bil sprejet, saj je bilo dokazano, da so bile za surovino, uvoženo in fizično vgrajeno v zadevni izdelek, prodan v Egiptu, plačane ustrezne carine.
However, the claim for an allowance relating to two other imported raw materials had to be rejected, since the investigation revealed that, during the IP, all such imports were used for exports of the product concerned.
Zahtevek za nadomestilo v zvezi z dvema drugima uvoženima surovinama pa je bilo treba zavrniti, saj je preiskava razkrila, da so bili v obdobju preiskave vsi tovrstni uvozi uporabljeni za izvoz zadevnega izdelka.
The company did not demonstrate that during the IP it had paid import duties which were not subsequently reimbursed and consequently borne by the like product when sold on the domestic market.
Družba ni dokazala, da je v obdobju preiskave plačala uvozne dajatve, ki kasneje niso bile povrnjene in posledično krite s podobnim izdelkom, ko je bil prodan na notranjem trgu.
Level of trade
Raven trgovine
One of the Egyptian exporting producers made a claim for a level of trade adjustment based on an alleged difference between sales on the domestic market and on the export market.
Eden od egiptovskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je vložil zahtevek za prilagoditev stopnje trgovine na podlagi domnevne razlike med prodajo na notranjem trgu in na izvoznem trgu.
The company claimed that sales on the domestic market were all made to end-users while sales to the Community were made to distributors.
Družba je trdila, da je bila celotna prodaja na notranjem trgu prodaja končnim uporabnikom, medtem ko je bila prodaja Skupnosti prodaja distributerjem.
The company provided information and claimed that a special adjustment should be made under Article 2(10)(d)(ii) of the basic Regulation.
Družba je posredovala podatke in zatrjevala, da bi bilo treba izvesti posebno prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(10)(d)(ii) osnovne uredbe.
In this regard, it should be noted that a claim for a level of trade adjustment, pursuant to Article 2(10)(d)(i) of the basic Regulation, can only be considered where it is demonstrated that there exist consistent and distinct differences in functions and prices for the different levels of trade in the domestic market.
V tej zvezi je treba omeniti, da je zahtevek za prilagoditev stopnje trgovine v skladu s členom 2(10)(d)(i) osnovne uredbe mogoče upoštevati le, kadar se dokaže, da obstajajo dosledne in izrazite razlike v funkcijah in cenah za različne stopnje trgovine na notranjem trgu.
In the present case, following the provisional disclosure, it was confirmed that all domestic sales in Egypt were made to end-users.
V tem primeru je bilo po začasnem razkritju potrjeno, da je bila celotna domača prodaja v Egiptu prodaja končnim uporabnikom.
In accordance with Article 2(10)(d)(i) of the basic Regulation, a difference in level of trade between domestic and export sales could not be quantified because of the absence of the relevant different levels of trade on the domestic market in Egypt.
V skladu s členom 2(10)(d)(i) osnovne uredbe ni bilo mogoče izmeriti razlike v stopnji trgovine med domačo prodajo in izvozom zaradi odsotnosti ustreznih različnih stopenj trgovine na notranjem trgu v Egiptu.
As regards the company’s export sales to the Community, it is confirmed, having analysed the comments of the company following the provisional disclosure that all sales were made to distributors.
Kar zadeva družbin izvoz v Skupnost, je po končani analizi pripomb družbe po začasnem razkritju potrjeno, da je bila celotna prodaja prodaja distributerjem.
In accordance with the provisions of Article 2(10)(d)(ii) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether there were grounds for making a special adjustment for a level of trade as claimed by the company on the basis of its own data.
Skladno z določbami člena 2(10)(d)(ii) osnovne uredbe je bilo preverjeno, ali so obstajali razlogi za izvedbo posebne prilagoditve stopnje trgovine, kot je trdila družba na podlagi lastnih podatkov.
It was considered, however, that the data provided by the company did not provide an appropriate basis for quantifying any special adjustment.
Vendar je prevladalo mnenje, da podatki, ki jih je predložila družba, ne predstavljajo ustrezne osnove za izmero morebitne posebne prilagoditve.
Given that Article 2(10)(d)(i) of the basic Regulation provides that ‘the amount of the adjustment shall be based on the market value of the difference’ it was considered that, if it could be shown that there was a price difference on the Community market for sales to different types of customers, this could be deemed an appropriate basis to quantify the market value of the difference equally under Article 2(10)(d)(ii) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na to, da člen 2(10)(d)(i) osnovne uredbe določa, da „znesek prilagoditve temelji na tržni vrednosti razlike,“ je prevladalo mnenje, da če je mogoče dokazati, da na trgu Skupnosti obstaja razlika v ceni za prodajo različnim vrstam strank, bi se to lahko štelo kot ustrezna osnova za izmero tržne vrednosti razlike tudi po členu 2(10)(d)(ii) osnovne uredbe.
In this regard, the information received from various interested parties in the Community in relation to their sales to different types of customers was examined.
V tej zvezi so preučili informacije, ki so jih prejeli od različnih zainteresiranih strank v Skupnosti, v zvezi z njihovo prodajo različnim vrstam strank.
It was found that differences existed in prices on the Community market when sold by the Community industry to different types of customers (in this case, sales prices to end-users and to distributors were examined).
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da obstajajo razlike v cenah na trgu Skupnosti, kadar industrija Skupnosti prodaja različnim vrstam strank (v tem primeru so preučili prodajne cene za končne uporabnike in distributerje).
It was considered that a special adjustment equivalent to the said difference in prices should therefore be made to the Egyptian exporter’s normal value.
Prevladalo je mnenje, da je torej treba izvesti posebno prilagoditev normalne vrednosti egiptovskega izvoznika, ustrezno omenjeni razliki v cenah.
Following the final disclosure of the facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of definitive measures, one Russian exporter claimed that to not grant it a claimed level of trade adjustment was discriminatory as one of the Egyptian exporters had been granted a similar adjustment.
Po končnem razkritju dejstev in razmislekov, na podlagi katerih naj bi se priporočila uvedba dokončnih ukrepov, je en ruski izvajalec trdil, da je diskriminatorno, če se mu ne odobri zahtevana prilagoditev stopnje trgovine, saj je bila podobna prilagoditev odobrena enemu egiptovskemu izvozniku.
In the case of the Russian exporter’s claim, it was found that there was no justification for such an adjustment.
V primeru zahtevka ruskega izvoznika je bilo ugotovljeno, da takšna prilagoditev ni utemeljena.
On the basis of verified data provided by the company, there was no consistent price difference in prices for sales of FeSi to the different levels of trade on the Russian market.
Iz preverjenih podatkov, ki jih je predložila družba, je razvidno, da ni doslednih razlik v ceni pri prodajnih cenah FeSi zaradi različnih ravni trgovine na ruskem trgu.
On this basis, no adjustment was warranted under Article 2(10)(d)(i) of the basic Regulation.
Zato v skladu s členom 2(10)(d)(i) osnovne uredbe prilagoditev ni bila potrebna.
With the exception of the adjustment mentioned in recital 50 above, recitals 61 to 63 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Z izjemo prilagoditve iz uvodne izjave 50 se potrdijo uvodne izjave 61 do 63 začasne uredbe.
Further analysis after the provisional stage proved that the level of cooperation from Russia had been incorrectly estimated.
Dodatna analiza po začasni fazi je pokazala, da je bila raven sodelovanja Rusije napačno ocenjena.
In fact, while the cooperation was around 100 %, it was wrongly estimated to be 32 % (see recital 76 of the provisional Regulation).
Pravzaprav je bilo sodelovanje okrog 100 %, medtem ko je (napačna) ocena znašala 32 % (glej uvodno izjavo 76 začasne uredbe).
Therefore, the residual dumping margin should be set at the level of the company with the highest dumping margin (rather than on the methodology used at provisional stage, i.e. the weighted average dumping margin of the most representative product type with the highest dumping margin).
Zato bi bilo treba preostalo stopnjo dampinga določiti na ravni družbe z najvišjo stopnjo dampinga (in ne po metodologiji, uporabljeni v začasni fazi, tj. tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga najbolj reprezentativne vrste izdelka z najvišjo stopnjo dampinga).