natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the comments submitted under this procedure, some competitors have mentioned other aid allegedly received by the LNE.
V pripombah, ki so jih v okviru te preiskave predložili nekateri konkurenti, so omenjene druge pomoči, od katerih je imel LNE korist.
These measures have not been the subject of this procedure.
Ti ukrepi niso predmet te preiskave.
In the light of the French authorities’ replies, the Commission none the less considers that it sufficiently well informed to take a position on them.
Komisija, ob upoštevanju odgovorov francoskih organov, meni, da ima dovolj informacij, da v zvezi s tem zavzame stališče.
The total amount of the grants awarded to the LNE by the Conseil Régional d’Ile-de-France to finance the commercial discount granted by the LNE to SMEs in that region was EUR 61000 in 2003. Since these grants can be regarded as aid to the LNE (and not to the client SMEs) and since they are not part of an existing aid scheme (see paragraph 54), they satisfy the conditions set out in Article 2 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 69/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to de minimis aid [38].
Realni znesek donacij, ki jih je LNE plačala regija Île-de-France za financiranje trgovinskega rabata, ki ga je LNE dodelila MSP v tej regiji, je leta 2003 znašal 61000 EUR. Te donacije izpolnjujejo pogoje iz člena 2 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 69/2001 z dne 12. januarja 2001 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES pri de minimis pomoči [38], ker se lahko preučijo kot pomoči za LNE (in ne pomoči za stranke iz MSP) ter ker ne izhajajo iz obstoječe sheme pomoči (glej točko 54).
The Commission cannot therefore oppose them.
Komisija jim torej ne more nasprotovati.
The Commission also notes that ADEME has not granted any aid to the LNE.
Komisija opozarja, da agencija ADEME LNE ni dodelila nobene pomoči.
Neither the LNE’s alleged use of the official logos of the French Republic nor its degree of participation in the work of international bodies seems to be relevant in this case.
V tem primeru se ne zdita pomembna niti domnevna uporaba uradnih logotipov Republike Francije s strani LNE, niti stopnja sodelovanja pri delu mednarodnih organov.
The LNE’s logo is different from the official logo, which can be used only by the public authorities.
Logotip LNE se razlikuje od uradnega logotipa, ki ga uporabljajo izključno javni organi.
As for the LNE representing the public authorities in certain European and international organisations (working parties of the International Organisation for Legal Metrology (OIML) and the Committee on European Cooperation in Legal Metrology (WELMEC)), any advantage that the LNE may gain from this in terms of image could not rank as State aid.
Kar se tiče zastopanja javnih organov v nekaterih evropskih in mednarodnih organih (delovnih skupinah Mednarodne organizacije za zakonsko meroslovje (OIML) in odboru Evropskega združenja za zakonsko meroslovje (WELMEC)), prednost v smislu boljše podobe, ki si jo lahko LNE na ta način izoblikuje, ne more spadati med državne pomoči.
The alleged advantages as regards self-insurance, a special labour legislation scheme for employees or free archiving do not exist in practice.
Domnevne prednosti glede samozavarovanja, posebne ureditve delovnega prava za zaposlene ali brezplačnega arhiviranja v praksi ne obstajajo.
The LNE’s insurance policies, which cost over EUR 300000 in 2004, are similar to those taken out by private undertakings.
Zavarovalne police LNE, ki so razen tega v letu 2004 znašale več kot 300000 EUR, so podobne tistim, ki jih sklepajo zasebna podjetja.
The LNE’s employees do not have special status, like that of the civil service, but instead come under private law both for unemployment insurance and for retirement.
Zaposleni pri LNE nimajo posebnega statusa, kot ga imajo tisti, ki opravljajo javno funkcijo, ampak spadajo v okvir zasebnega prava – glede zavarovanja za primer brezposelnosti in upokojitve.
Lastly, the LNE is not entitled to free archiving — on the contrary, the direct cost of this was some EUR 80000 in 2005.
Nazadnje, LNE ni upravičen do brezplačnega arhiviranja – nasprotno, ustrezni neposredni stroški so leta 2005 znašali 80000 EUR.
The LNE’s de facto entitlement to the research tax credit does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1), especially since this de facto entitlement does not involve any state resources.
LNE je dejansko upravičen do davčnih olajšav za raziskave in ta dejanska upravičenost ne pomeni državne pomoči v smislu člena 87(1), predvsem zato ker ne obsega državnih sredstev.
It results from the LNE having been the subject of an ad hoc evaluation of its researchers in the context of its public obligations in the research field.
Ta upravičenost izhaja iz dejstva, da je bil LNE predmet ad hoc ocenjevanja, ki so ga njegovi raziskovalci opravili v okviru njegovih javnih obveznosti na področju raziskovanja.
Furthermore, the research tax credit is taken into account in the LNE’s income and expenditure.
Davčne olajšave za raziskave se poleg tega upoštevajo pri prihodkih in odhodkih LNE.
As for the customs authorities’ alleged support for the LNE, this is not backed up by any precise information.
Kar zadeva domnevno podporo carine za LNE, pa ta trditev ni podprta z nobenim natančnim podatkom.
It transpires that the DGDDI uses its own laboratories, those of the DGCCRF or external laboratories, including the LNE, the Institut national de recherche et de sécurité or the Centre scientifique et technique du bâtiment (CSTB) for construction products.
Očitno je, da DGDDI uporablja lastne laboratorije, laboratorije DGCCRF ali zunanje laboratorije, med katerimi so tudi LNE, Institut national de recherche et de sécurité ali Centre scientifique et technique du bâtiment (CSTB) za gradbene proizvode.
Subject to Section 5.4, public service compensation in the form of budget allocations from the State and the BNM and grants from the regional authorities that were awarded to the LNE between 1993 and 2005 constitute State aid.
Z izjemo točke 5.4 so nadomestila za javne storitve v obliki proračunskih donacij države in BNM ter donacije lokalnih skupnosti, dodeljene LNE med leti 1993 in 2005, državne pomoči.
The Commission finds that France has unlawfully implemented the aid in question in breach of Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je Francija nezakonito izvajala zadevne državne pomoči in kršila člen 88(3) Pogodbe.
However, this aid is compatible with Article 86(2) of the Treaty.
Toda te pomoči so združljive s členom 86(2) Pogodbe.
This decision does not concern the state guarantee for which the LNE’s activities in the commercial sector could qualify because of its EPIC status.
Ta odločba ne zadeva državnega jamstva, do katerega bi bile upravičene dejavnosti LNE v trgovinskem sektorju, ker imajo status gospodarske javne ustanove.
This aspect, which has led to a proposal for appropriate measures under Article 88(1) of the Treaty [39], will be the subject of further decisions,
Ta vidik, zaradi katerega je bil pripravljen predlog ustreznih ukrepov iz člena 88(1) Pogodbe [39], se bo obravnaval v nadaljnjih odločbah –
The public service compensation which France implemented unlawfully for the Laboratoire national de métrologie et d’essais between 1993 and 2005 is compatible with the common market.
Nadomestila za javne storitve, ki jih je Francija med leti 1993 in 2005 nezakonito izvajala za Laboratoire national de métrologie et d’essais, so državne pomoči, združljive s skupnim trgom.
OJ C 263, 22.10.2005, p. 22.
UL C 263, 22.10.2005, str. 22.
LNE is the acronym for the Laboratoire national de métrologie et d'essais, established by Decree of 25 January 2005, following the incorporation of the Bureau national de métrologie into the Laboratoire national d'essais.
LNE je kratica za Laboratoire national de métrologie et d’essais (Nacionalni laboratorij za meteorologijo in poskuse), ki je bil ustanovljen z uredbo z dne 25. januarja 2005 po združitvi Bureau national de métrologie (Nacionalnega urada za meteorologijo) in Laboratoire national d’essais (Nacionalnega laboratorija za poskuse).
See footnote 1.
Glej opombo 1 zgoraj.
For example, metrology and instrumentation, materials, consumer products, health and medical apparatus, industrial equipment and components, logistics and packaging, energy and the environment.
Na primer na področjih meroslovja ter izdelave in uporabe inštrumentov, materialov, potrošniških izdelkov, zdravja in medicinskih pripomočkov, industrijske opreme in sestavnih delov, logistike in pakiranja, energetike in okolja.
Source: www.lne.fr
Vir: www.lne.fr
In 2001 the LNE set up LNE-Asia, a joint venture between the LNE and the CMA Testing and Certification Laboratories.
LNE je leta 2001 ustanovil LNE-Asia, skupno podjetje LNE in CMA-Testing and Certification Laboratories.
This decree was amended by Decrees Nos 2005-49 of 25 January 2005 and 2005-436 of 9 May 2005, in particular as regards the financial and accounting arrangements and the supervision of the LNE.
Ta uredba je bila spremenjena z uredbama št. 2005-49 z dne 25. januarja 2005 in št. 2005-436 z dne 9. maja 2005, predvsem kar zadeva finančne in računovodske postopke ter nadzor LNE.
The LNE's resources, however, remain exactly the same.
Viri LNE ostajajo še vedno isti.
The sum of the amounts corresponding to the Metrology Contract and of the operating grants on the profit and loss account.
Gre za vsoto zneskov, ki ustrezajo meroslovnim pogodbam in donacijam za poslovanje glede na bilanco uspeha.
Including the judgment of the Court of 11 April 1989 in Case 66/86, Ahmed Saeed Flugreisen et al.
Predvsem Sodba Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 11. aprila 1989, v zadevi Ahmed Saeed Flugreisen et al.
Judgment of the Court of 15 June 2005 in Case T-17/02 Fred Olsen, SA v Commission [2005] ECR II-2031, at paragraphs 186 et seq. and 216.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 15. junija 2005, Olsen proti Komisiji (T-17/02, Recueil 2005, str. II-2031, točka 186 in dalje ter točka 216).
Judgment of 24 July 2003, in Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg [2003] ECR I-7747.
Sodba z dne 24. julija 2003, v zadevi Altmark Trans in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg (C-280/00, Receuil, str. I-7747).
OJ C 297, 29.11.2005, p. 4.
UL C 297, 29.11.2005, str. 4.
File NN 6/89, regional centres of innovation and technology transfer.
Dokumentacija sheme pomoči NN 6/89, regionalni centri za inovacijo in prenos tehnologije.
Letter to the French authorities, (SEC(1989)814 of 23.5.1989).
Dopis francoskim organom SEC(1989) 814, 23.5.1989.
Clearly, activities in the market sector are economic activities within the meaning of the case-law.
Nedvomno je, da so dejavnosti v trgovinskem sektorju gospodarske dejavnosti v smislu sodne prakse.
Judgment of the Court of 10 January 2006 in Case C-222/04 Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze et al.
Sodba Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 10. januarja 2006, v zadevi Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze et al.
ECR I-289.
(C-222/04, Receuil 2006, str. I-289).
Subject to what is stated in paragraph 5.4 of this decision.
Z izjemo tistega, kar je omenjeno v točki 5.4 te odločbe.
The BNM was a public interest group made up of the French State, represented by the Ministry for Industry and the Ministry for Research and New Technologies, and of public entities, viz. the Commissariat à l'énergie atomique, the Conservatoire national des arts et métiers, the LNE and the Observatoire de Paris.
BNM je bila javnointeresna skupina, sestavljena na eni strani iz francoske države, ki sta jo zastopala ministrstvo za industrijo ter ministrstvo za raziskovanje in nove tehnologije, na drugi strani pa iz oseb javnega prava: Commissariat à l’énergie atomique, Conservatoire national des arts et métiers, LNE in Observatoire de Paris.
The public interest group was funded by its members.
Finančna sredstva javnointeresne skupine zagotavljajo njeni člani.
See the judgment of the Court of 14 October 1987 in Case 248/84 Federal Republic of Germany v Commission [1987] ECR. I 4013, at paragraph 17).
Glej sodbo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 14. oktobra 1987, Allemagne proti Komisiji (248/84, Receuil, str. I 4013, točka 17).
See the judgment of 19 September 2000 in Case C-156/98 Germany v Commission [2003] ECR I-6857 paragraph 30, and the case-law cited.
Glej sodbo z dne 19. septembra 2000, Nemčija proti Komisiji (C-156/98, Receuil, str. I-6857, točka 30 in citirana sodna praksa).
See the judgment of 16 September 2004 in Case T-274/01 Valmont ECR II-3145, at paragraph 44, and the case-law cited.
Glej sodbo z dne 16. septembra 2004, v zadevi Valmont (T-274/01, Receuil, str. II-3145, točka 44 in citirana sodna praksa).
See, for example the judgments of the Court of 17 September 1980 in Case 730/79 Philip Morris/Commission [1986] ECR 2671, at paragraphs 11 and 12 and of 30 April 1998 in Case T-214/95 Vlaams Gewest/Commission [1998] ECR II-717, at paragraphs 48 to 50.
Glej predvsem sodbo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 17. septembra 1980, Philip Morris proti Komisiji (730/79, Receuil, str. 2671, točki 11 in 12) ter sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 30. aprila 1998, Vlaams Gewest proti Komisiji (T-214/95, Receuil, str. II-717, točke 48 do 50).
The LNE's competitors are both domestic companies and international groups (Bureau Veritas, Intertek, etc.).
Konkurenti LNE so podjetja z nacionalno razsežnostjo ter mednarodne skupine (Bureau Veritas, Intertek …).
See the judgment of 24 July 2003 in Case 280/00 in Altmark Trans and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg [2003] ECR I-7747, at paragraph 87.
Sodba z dne 24. julija 2003, v zadevi Altmark Trans in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg (C-280/00, Receuil, str. I-7747, točka 87).
The tasks in question are described in detail in Section 2.
Zadevne naloge so natančno obrazložene v poglavju 2.
For the purposes of this procedure, it is not necessary to establish whether the LNE has set up separate accounts and has identified public funds made available in accordance with Commission Directive 80/723/EEC.
V okviru tega postopka ni treba ugotoviti, ali je LNE vzpostavil ločeno računovodstvo in je iz tega izhajalo, da so javna sredstva dana na voljo v skladu z Direktivo Komisije 80/723/EGS.
A possible infringement of this Directive would not affect the compatibility of the aid in question with the common market.
Morebitna kršitev te direktive ne vpliva na združljivost zadevnih pomoči s skupnim trgom.
The commercial sector represents the following percentages of the LNE's turnover:2005 — 71 %, 2004 — 70 %, 2003 — 69 %, 2002 — 66 %, 2001 — 66 %, 2000 — 66 %, 1999 — 64 %, 1998 — 65 %, 1997 — 61 %, 1996 — 60 %, 1995 — 58 %, 1994 — 60 % and 1993 — 62 %.
Promet LNE v trgovinskem sektorju znaša:2005 – 71 %, 2004 – 70 %, 2003 – 69 %, 2002 – 66 %, 2001 – 66 %, 2000 – 66 %, 1999 – 64 %, 1998 – 65 %, 1997 – 61 %, 1996 – 60 %, 1995 – 58 %, 1994 – 60 %, 1993 – 62 %.
The revenue and expenditure of the ‘mixed’ sector mentioned when the procedure was initiated were allocated between the public and commercial sectors according to the methodology set out in the preceding paragraphs.
Prihodki in odhodki v „mešanem“ sektorju, omenjenem v uvodnem delu postopka, so bili razdeljeni med javnim in trgovinskim sektorjem po metodologiji, opisani v zgornjih uvodnih izjavah.
The possibility for the Commission, in the absence of analytical accounts, to rely on an analytical reconstruction of the costs carried out ex post by backward projection was endorsed by the Court (see the judgment of 7 June 2006 in Case T-613/97, Report 2006, p. II-01531, Union française de l'express (UFEX), in particular paragraph 137).
Če analitičnega računovodstva ni na voljo, ima Komisija možnost, da se opre na analitično rekonstrukcijo stroškov, ki se opravi naknadno po metodi retropolacije, kar je potrdilo Sodišče prve stopnje (glej sodbo z dne 7. junija 2006 v zadevi T-613/97, Union française de l’express (UFEX), zlasti točko 137).
The turnover of the public sector does not include the share of investment grants paid into the profit and loss account.
Promet v javnem sektorju ne zajema deleža pri investicijski podpori, ki se prenese na izkaz poslovnega izida.
For the Laboratoires Pourquery, the available data does not go beyond 2004.
Za Laboratoires Pourquery so podatki na voljo le do leta 2004.
After analysing the loan conditions granted by the banks to the LNE, even if the guarantee that is the corollary of its status as a public industrial and commercial enterprise conferred an advantage on the LNE for public sector activities, this advantage would be very small in value, close to the de minimis amount, and would not call into question the proportionality tests carried out in paragraphs 101 to 103 in respect of public service compensation.
Čeprav je LNE z jamstvom, povezanim s statusom gospodarske javne ustanove, dana prednost za dejavnosti v javnem sektorju, ostaja po analizi posojilnih pogojev, ki jih je banka dodelila LNE, vrednost te prednosti majhna, blizu zneska de minimis, in ne bi posledično dvomili o preskuse sorazmernosti iz uvodnih izjav 101 do 103 glede nadomestil za javne storitve.
This could be the case, for example, of basic research in metrology.
Tak bi lahko bil predvsem primer temeljnega raziskovanja v meroslovju.
See in this connection Commission Decision 2001/46/EC of 26.7.2000 on the State aid measure implemented by Germany for the SICAN group and its project partners, and in particular paragraphs 87 to 92 (OJ L 18, 19.1.2001, p. 18).
V zvezi s tem glejte Odločbo Komisije 2001/46/ES z dne 26. julija 2000 o državni pomoči Nemčije za skupino Sican in njene partnerje, (UL L 18, 19.1.2001, str. 18), zlasti točke 87 do 92.
Aid E 24/2004 and letter of 5 July 2005.
Pomoč E 24/2004 in dopis z dne 5. julija 2005.
The subsidies granted by the Conseil Régional d’Ile de France amount to EUR 61000 since 1995.
Znesek donacij, ki jih dodeljuje regija Île-de-France, znaša 61000 EUR od leta 1995 dalje.
The real recipients of these subsidies were the SMEs in question.
Dejanski upravičenci do teh donacij so bila zadevna MSP.
ECR 803.
(66/86, Receuil 1989, str. 803).
of 28 March 2007
z dne 28. marca 2007
on amending Decision C(2006) 4332 final fixing an annual indicative allocation by Member State for the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013 of the Community commitment appropriations from the European Fisheries Fund
o spremembi Odločbe C(2006) 4332 konč. o določitvi okvirne letne razporeditve odobritev za prevzem obveznosti Skupnosti iz Evropskega sklada za ribištvo po državah članicah za obdobje od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2013
(notified under document number C(2007) 1313)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 1313)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 of 27 July 2006 on the European Fisheries Fund [1], and in particular Article14 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1198/2006 z dne 27. julija 2006 o Evropskem skladu za ribištvo [1] in zlasti člena 14 Uredbe,
Commission Decision C(2006) 4332 final of 4 October 2006, fixed an annual indicative allocation by Member State, for the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013, of the Community commitment appropriations for the regions eligible for funding from the European Fisheries Fund (hereinafter EFF) under the non-Convergence objective, of the Community commitment appropriations for the regions eligible for funding from the EFF under the Convergence objective and of the total Community commitment appropriations from the European Fisheries Fund.
Odločba Komisije C(2006) 4332 konč. z dne 4. oktobra 2006 je po državah članicah za obdobje od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2013 določila okvirno letno razporeditev odobritev za prevzem obveznosti Skupnosti za regije, ki so upravičene do financiranja iz Evropskega sklada za ribištvo (v nadaljnjem besedilu „ESR“) v okviru nekonvergenčnega cilja, odobritev za prevzem obveznosti Skupnosti za regije, upravičene do financiranja iz ESR v okviru konvergenčnega cilja, ter skupnih odobritev za prevzem obveznosti Skupnosti iz Evropskega sklada za ribištvo.
With a view to allowing Bulgaria and Romania to benefit until 2013 from the EFF, the indicative amounts, concerning Bulgaria and Romania, of the Community commitment appropriations for the regions eligible for funding from the EFF under the Convergence objective and the total Community commitment appropriations from the EFF should be fixed.
Da se Bolgariji in Romuniji omogoči črpanje sredstev ESR do leta 2013, je treba v zvezi z Bolgarijo in Romunijo določiti okvirne zneske odobritev za prevzem obveznosti Skupnosti za regije, upravičene do financiranja iz ESR v okviru konvergenčnega cilja, in skupnih odobritev za prevzem obveznosti Skupnosti iz ESR.
Decision C(2006) 4332 final should be amended accordingly,
Odločbo C(2006) 4332 konč. je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Annex I to Decision C(2006) 4332 final is replaced by the Annex I to this Decision.
Priloga I k Odločbi C(2006) 4332 konč. se nadomesti s Prilogo I k tej odločbi.
Done at Brussels, 28 March 2007.
V Bruslju, 28. marca 2007
Annual indicative breakdown by Member State for the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013 of the Community commitment appropriations for the regions eligible for funding from the EFF after separating out the amount devoted for technical assistance at the initiative of/and or behalf of the Commission
Okvirna letna razčlenitev odobritev za prevzem obveznosti Skupnosti po državah članicah za obdobje od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2013 za regije, upravičene do financiranja iz ESR, po odštetju zneska, namenjenega tehnični pomoči na pobudo in/ali v imenu Komisije
Annual indicative breakdown by Member State for the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013 of the Community commitment appropriations for the regions eligible for funding from the EFF under the non Convergence objective (2004 prices)
Okvirna letna razčlenitev odobritev za prevzem obveznosti Skupnosti po državah članicah za obdobje od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2013 za regije, upravičene do financiranja iz ESR v okviru nekonvergenčnega cilja (cene iz leta 2004)
Annual indicative breakdown by Member State of the Community commitment appropriations for the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013 for the regions eligible for funding from the EFF under the Convergence objective (2004 prices)
Okvirna letna razčlenitev odobritev za prevzem obveznosti Skupnosti po državah članicah za obdobje od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2013 za regije, upravičene do financiranja iz ESR v okviru konvergenčnega cilja (cene iz leta 2004)
Annual indicative breakdown by Member State for the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013 of the total Community commitment appropriations from the EFF (2004 prices)
Okvirna letna razčlenitev skupnih odobritev za prevzem obveznosti Skupnosti iz ESR po državah članicah za obdobje od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2013 (cene iz leta 2004)
concerning a Community financial contribution towards a baseline survey on the prevalence of Salmonella in slaughter pigs to be carried out in Bulgaria and in Romania
o finančnem prispevku Skupnosti za temeljno raziskavo o razširjenosti salmonele pri klavnih prašičih, ki jo je treba izvesti v Bolgariji in Romuniji
(notified under document number C(2007) 1394)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 1394)
(Only the Bulgarian and Romanian texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v bolgarskem in romunskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Regulation (EC) No 2160/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the control of Salmonella and other specified food-borne zoonotic agents [2], provides that a Community target is to be established for the reduction of the prevalence of Salmonella in populations of herds of slaughter pigs by the end of 2007.
Uredba (ES) št. 2160/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. novembra 2003 o nadzoru salmonele in drugih opredeljenih povzročiteljih zoonoz, ki se prenašajo z živili [2], predvideva, da je treba določiti cilj Skupnosti za zmanjšanje razširjenosti salmonele v čredah klavnih prašičev do konca leta 2007.