natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
BAM: BAM NBM Wegenbouw BV from 1 April 1994 to 15 April 2002 and Koninklijke BAM Groep NV from 1 November 2000 to 15 April 2002;
BAM: BAM NBM Wegenbouw BV od 1. aprila 1994 do 15. aprila 2002 in Koninklijke BAM Groep NV od 1. novembra 2000 do 15. aprila 2002;
Dura Vermeer: Vermeer Infrastructuur BV from 1 April 1994 to 15 April 2002, Dura Vermeer Groep NV from 13 November 1998 until 15 April 2002 and Dura Vermeer Infra BV from 1 July 2000 to 15 April 2002.
Dura Vermeer: Vermeer Infrastructuur BV od 1. aprila 1994 do 15. aprila 2002, Dura Vermeer Groep NV od 13. novembra 1998 do 15. aprila 2002 in Dura Vermeer Infra BV od 1. julija 2000 do 15. aprila 2002;
HBG: HBG Civiel BV from 1 April 1994 to 15 April 2002;
HBG: HBG Civiel BV od 1. aprila 1994 do 15. aprila 2002;
Heijmans: Heijmans NV and Heijmans Infrastructuur BV from 1 April 1994 to 15 April 2002;
Heijmans: Heijmans NV in Heijmans Infrastructuur BV od 1. aprila 1994 do 15. aprila 2002;
KWS: Koninklijke Volker Wessels Stevin NV and Koninklijke Wegenbouw Stevin BV from 1 April 1994 to 15 April 2002;
KWS: Koninklijke Volker Wessels Stevin NV in Koninklijke Wegenbouw Stevin BV od 1. aprila 1994 do 15. aprila 2002;
The collusive practices can be categorised as price fixing practices for road pavement bitumen in the Netherlands between the suppliers, between the main purchasers, as well as between these suppliers and purchasers.
Nedovoljeno dogovarjanje je mogoče opredeliti kot določanje cen bitumna za tlakovanje cest na Nizozemskem med dobavitelji, glavnimi kupci ter med temi dobavitelji in kupci.
The evidence of this cartel covers the period between 1 April 1994 and 15 April 2002 and relates essentially to the practice of regularly fixing collectively the gross price for sales and purchases of road pavement bitumen, a uniform rebate on the gross price for participating road builders and a smaller maximum rebate on the gross price for other road builders.
Dokazi o tem kartelu vključujejo obdobje med 1. aprilom 1994 in 15. aprilom 2002 ter se nanašajo večinoma na redno skupno določanje bruto cene za prodajo in nakup bitumna za tlakovanje cest, enotnega rabata na bruto cene za udeležene graditelje cest in manjšega največjega rabata na bruto cene za druge graditelje cest.
The Commission considers that the entire system of preparatory and joint meetings, with the ensuing agreements between the group of bitumen suppliers and the group of road builders on gross prices and rebates for road pavement bitumen in the Netherlands forms part of a single overall scheme and therefore constitutes a single infringement of Article 81 of the Treaty.
Komisija meni, da je celoten sistem pripravljalnih in skupnih sestankov, ki so imeli za posledico dogovore med skupino dobaviteljev bitumna in skupino graditeljev cest o bruto cenah in rabatih za bitumen za tlakovanje cest na Nizozemskem, del enotne skupne sheme in zato pomeni enotno kršitev člena 81 Pogodbe.
The basic amount of the fine is determined according to the gravity and duration of the infringement.
Osnovni znesek globe se določi v skladu s težo in trajanjem kršitve.
In assessing the gravity of the infringement, the Commission takes account of its nature, its actual impact on the market, where this can be measured, and the size of the relevant geographic market.
Pri presoji teže kršitve Komisija upošteva naravo kršitve, njen dejanski učinek na trg, kadar ga je mogoče izmeriti, in velikost upoštevnega geografskega trga.
Regarding the nature of the infringement, the fact that it must have had an impact and the fact that it covered a substantial part of the common market, the Commission considers that the undertakings to which this Decision is addressed have committed a very serious infringement of Article 81 of the Treaty.
Komisija glede narave kršitve zaradi dejstva, da je kršitev morala imeti učinek, in dejstva, da je zajela znaten del skupnega trga, ugotavlja, da so podjetja, na katera je ta odločba naslovljena, zagrešila zelo hudo kršitev člena 81 Pogodbe.
Differential treatment
Diferencialno obravnavanje
Within the category of very serious infringements, the scale of likely fines makes it possible to apply differential treatment to undertakings in order to take account of the effective economic capacity of the offenders, respectively, to cause significant damage to competition.
V kategoriji zelo težkih kršitev omogoča lestvica verjetnih glob podjetjem uporabo diferencialnega obravnavanja, da bi upoštevali dejansko gospodarsko zmožnost posameznih kršiteljev, da povzročijo znatno škodo konkurenci.
This is appropriate where, as in this case, there are considerable disparities between the respective market shares of the undertakings participating in the infringement.
To je, tako kot v tem primeru, primerno takrat, ko obstajajo precejšnja nesorazmerja med zadevnimi tržnimi deleži podjetij, ki sodelujejo v kršitvi.
The undertakings have been divided into six categories according to their relative importance in the relevant market in 2001, the last full year of the infringement.
Podjetja so bila razdeljena v šest kategorij v skladu s svojo relativno pomembnostjo na zadevnem trgu v letu 2001, ki je bilo zadnje polno leto kršitve.
Sufficient deterrence
Zadostno odvračilo
The Commission notes that in this proceeding Shell, BP, Total and Kuwait Petroleum had worldwide turnovers in financial year 2005, the most recent financial year preceding this Decision, of respectively EUR 246, 203, 143 and 37 billion. All other undertakings had worldwide turnovers of less than EUR 10 billion.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je v tem postopku svetovni promet družb Shell, BP, Total in Kuwait Petroleum v finančnem letu 2005, ki je bilo zadnje finančno leto pred to odločbo, znašal 246, 203, 143 oziroma 37 milijard EUR. Svetovni promet vseh drugih podjetij je bil manjši od 10 milijard EUR.
Individualised multiplying factors are applied accordingly to the duration of the infringement proper to each company ranging from 1,5 to 8 years (see recital 6 above).
Individualizirani množilni koeficienti se uporabljajo v skladu s trajanjem kršitve posameznega podjetja, ki segajo od 1,5 do 8 let (glej zgornji odstavek 6).
At the time the infringement took place, Shell had already been subject to previous Commission prohibition decisions for cartel activities [1].
V času kršitve je Shell že bil predmet odločb Komisije o prepovedi zaradi kartelnih dejavnosti [1].
This recidivism constitutes an aggravating circumstance justifying an increase of 50 % in the basic amount of the fine to be imposed on Shell.
Ta ponovitev kaznivega dejanja pomeni oteževalno okoliščino, ki upravičuje 50-odstotno povečanje osnovnega zneska globe, ki se naloži Shellu.
During the inspections, KWS refused to submit to the investigation, prompting the inspectors to invoke the assistance of the national competition authority and the police.
KWS je med inšpekcijskimi pregledi zavrnil sodelovanje v preiskavi, zaradi česar so se morali inšpektorji za pomoč obrniti na nacionalni organ za konkurenco in policijo.
The Commission considers that this obstruction constitutes an aggravating circumstance that justifies an increase of 10 % in the basic amount of the fine to be imposed on KWS.
Komisija meni, da to oviranje pomeni oteževalno okoliščino, ki upravičuje 10-odstotno povečanje osnovnega zneska globe, ki se naloži KWS.
Shell, within the group of bitumen suppliers, and KWS, within the group of the bitumen purchasers, bear a special responsibility for their role in instigating and leading the cartel.
Shell v skupini dobaviteljev bitumna in KWS v skupini kupcev bitumna sta še posebej odgovorna za svojo vlogo pri spodbujanju in vodenju kartela.
They were the driving forces in the operation of the cartel.
Bila sta gibali delovanja kartela.
This role justifies an increase of 50 % in the basic amount of the fine to be imposed on Shell and KWS.
Ta vloga upravičuje 50-odstotno povečanje osnovnega zneska globe, ki se naloži Shellu in KWS.
Application of the 10 % turnover limit
Uporaba 10-odstotne omejitve prometa
Article 23(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 [2] provides that the fine imposed on each undertaking is not to exceed 10 % of its turnover.
Člen 23(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1/2003 [2] določa, da globa, naložena posameznemu podjetju, ne sme presegati 10 % njegovega prometa.
This threshold is applied to the fines calculated for Esha (Esha Holding BV, Smid & Hollander BV and Esha Port Services Amsterdam BV) and Klöckner Bitumen BV.
Ta prag se uporabi za globe, izračunane za družbi Esha (Esha Holding BV, Smid & Hollander BV in Esha Port Services Amsterdam BV) in Klöckner Bitumen BV.
BP was the first undertaking to inform the Commission of the existence of a bitumen cartel in the Netherlands and the Commission granted BP conditional immunity from fines in accordance with point 15 of the Notice.
BP je bilo prvo podjetje, ki je Komisijo obvestilo o obstoju kartela za bitumen na Nizozemskem in Komisija je družbi BP podelila pogojno imuniteto pred globami v skladu s točko 15 obvestila.
BP has co-operated fully, on a continuous basis and expeditiously throughout the Commission’s administrative procedure.
BP je ves čas Komisijinega upravnega postopka sodeloval v celoti, stalno in hitro.
BP ended its involvement in the suspected infringement no later than the time at which it submitted evidence under the Leniency Notice and did not take steps to coerce other undertakings to participate in the infringement.
BP je prekinil sodelovanje v domnevni kršitvi najpozneje ob predložitvi dokazov v skladu z obvestilom o prizanesljivosti in ni naredil nobenih korakov v smeri spodbujanja drugih podjetij k sodelovanju v kršitvi.
Hence, BP qualifies for a full immunity from fines.
Zato je BP upravičen do popolne imunitete pred globami.
Point 23(b), first indent (reduction of 30 to 50 %)
Točka 23(b), prva alinea (zmanjšanje za 30–50 %)
Kuwait Petroleum was the next undertaking to approach the Commission under the Leniency Notice and was the first undertaking to meet the requirements of point 21 thereof.
Kuwait Petroleum je bilo naslednje podjetje, ki se je obrnilo na Komisijo v skladu z obvestilom o prizanesljivosti, in prvo podjetje, ki je izpolnilo zahteve iz točke 21 obvestila.
The evidence provided by Kuwait Petroleum strengthened by its very nature the Commission’s ability to prove the facts in question, and therefore represented added value with respect to the evidence in the Commission’s possession at that time.
Dokazi, ki jih je predložil Kuwait Petroleum, so po svoji naravi okrepili zmožnost Komisije, da dokaže zadevna dejstva, zato so pomenili dodano vrednost glede na dokaze, ki jih je Komisija takrat imela.
This added value was significant because it corroborated the existing information and, together with the information already in the Commission’s possession, assisted the Commission in proving the infringement.
Ta dodana vrednost je bila pomembna, saj je okrepila obstoječe informacije in, skupaj z informacijami, ki jih je Komisija že imela, podprla Komisijo pri dokazovanju kršitve.
It must be taken into account that BP was not a regular attendant of the bitumen consultation meetings with the purchasers and Kuwait Petroleum was the first to give direct evidence on this central element of the cartel’s functioning.
Upoštevati je treba, da BP ni bil redni udeleženec posvetovalnih srečanj za bitumen s kupci in da je bil Kuwait Petroleum prvi, ki je zagotovil neposredne dokaze o tem osrednjem elementu delovanja kartela.
In accordance with point 23 of the Leniency Notice, Kuwait Petroleum therefore qualifies for a reduction of the fine between 30 % and 50 %.
Zato v skladu s točko 23 obvestila o prizanesljivosti Kuwait Petroleum izpolnjuje pogoje za zmanjšanje globe med 30 in 50 %.
For the exact reduction of the fine to be imposed on Kuwait Petroleum, it must be taken into account that Kuwait Petroleum’s leniency application and the further evidence provided thereafter strengthened by its level of detail the Commission’s ability to prove the facts in question.
Za točen znesek zmanjšanja globe, ki bo naložena Kuwait Petroleumu, je treba upoštevati, da so prošnja za prizanesljivost Kuwait Petroleuma in po tem predloženi dokazi s svojo stopnjo natančnosti okrepili zmožnost Komisije, da dokaže zadevna dejstva.
However, it must also be taken into account that the application was made more than 11 months after the Commission had conducted inspections and only after the Commission had sent the parties a request for information asking for detailed factual information about the events.
Vendar pa je treba tudi upoštevati, da je bila prošnja vložena več kot enajst mesecev po tem, ko je Komisija opravila inšpekcijske preglede, in šele po tem, ko je Komisija strankam poslala zahtevo po informacijah, v kateri je spraševala po podrobnih dejanskih informacijah o dogodkih.
Moreover, the Commission considers it serious that certain important statements Kuwait Petroleum had made in respect of the alleged participation in the cartel of ExxonMobil were later reformulated and could not be used in evidence against this undertaking.
Poleg tega Komisija obravnava kot resno dejstvo, da so bile nekatere pomembne izjave Kuwait Petroleuma v zvezi z domnevnim sodelovanjem ExxonMobila v kartelu kasneje preoblikovane in jih ni bilo mogoče uporabiti kot dokaz proti temu podjetju.
The Commission concludes that Kuwait Petroleum is entitled to a 30 % reduction of the fine that would otherwise have been imposed.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je Kuwait Petroleum upravičen do 30-odstotnega znižanja globe, ki bi mu bila sicer naložena.
Other applications for leniency
Druge prošnje za prizanesljivost
Shell also filed an application under section B of the Leniency Notice but no reward is proposed, due to lack of significant added value.
Tudi Shell je vložil prošnjo v skladu s poglavjem B obvestila o prizanesljivosti, vendar zaradi pomanjkanja znatne dodane vrednosti ni predlagana nobena nagrada.
Nynäs and Total also claim that they have provided the Commission with self-incriminating information on a voluntary basis.
Tudi Nynäs in Total trdita, da sta Komisiji prostovoljno zagotovila informacije, s katerimi sta obremenila sama sebe.
But the Commission considers that the information provided does not constitute significant added value on the basis of which the Commission should grant a reduction of penalty.
Vendar pa Komisija meni, da zagotovljene informacije ne pomenijo znatne dodane vrednosti, na podlagi katere bi Komisija dodelila znižanje kazni.
Wintershall claims that it ought to be covered by the immunity application of BP.
Wintershall trdi, da bi moral biti zajet v prošnji BP za imuniteto.
But Wintershall still exists as a separate undertaking from BP and it was BP, not Wintershall, which decided to apply for immunity with the Commission.
Vendar pa Wintershall še vedno obstaja kot podjetje, ki je ločeno od BP, tisti, ki se je odločil zaprositi za imuniteto pri Komisiji, pa ni bil Wintershall, temveč BP.
The following undertakings infringed Article 81 of the Treaty by regularly fixing collectively, for the periods indicated, for sales and purchases of road pavement bitumen in the Netherlands the gross price, a uniform rebate on the gross price for participating road builders and a smaller maximum rebate on the gross price for other road builders:
Naslednja podjetja so kršila člen 81 Pogodbe, tako da so za navedena obdobja za prodaje in nakupe bitumna za tlakovanje cest na Nizozemskem redno skupaj določala bruto ceno, enotni rabat na bruto ceno za sodelujoče graditelje cest in nižji maksimalni rabat na bruto ceno za druge graditelje cest:
BAM NBM: BAM NBM Wegenbouw BV from 1 April 1994 to 15 April 2002 and Koninklijke BAM Groep NV from 1 November 2000 to 15 April 2002;
BAM NBM: BAM NBM Wegenbouw BV od 1. aprila 1994 do 15. aprila 2002 in Koninklijke BAM Groep NV od 1. novembra 2000 do 15. aprila 2002;
BP plc from 1 April 1994 to 15 April 2002, BP Nederland BV from 1 April 1994 to 1 January 2000 and BP Refining & Petrochemicals GmbH from 31 December 1999 to 15 April 2002;
BP: BP plc. od 1. aprila 1994 do 15. aprila 2002, BP Nederland BV od 1. aprila 1994 do 1. januarja 2000 in BP Refining & Petrochemicals GmbH od 31. decembra 1999 do 15. aprila 2002;
Dura Vermeer: Vermeer Infrastructuur BV from 1 April 1994 to 15 April 2002, Dura Vermeer Groep NV from 13 November 1998 to 15 April 2002 and Dura Vermeer Infra BV from 30 June 2000 to 15 April 2002;
Dura Vermeer: Vermeer Infrastructuur BV od 1. aprila 1994 do 15. aprila 2002, Dura Vermeer Groep NV od 13. novembra 1998 do 15. aprila 2002 in Dura Vermeer Infra BV od 30. junija 2000 do 15. aprila 2002;
Klöckner: Klöckner Bitumen BV from 1 April 1994 to 15 April 2002 and Sideron Industrial Development BV from 1 January 2000 to 15 April 2002;
Klöckner: Klöckner Bitumen BV od 1. aprila 1994 do 15. aprila 2002 in Sideron Industrial Development BV od 1. januarja 2000 do 15. aprila 2002;
Kuwait Petroleum: Kuwait Petroleum Corporation, Kuwait Petroleum International Ltd and Kuwait Petroleum (Nederland) BV from 1 April 1994 to 15 April 2002;
Kuwait Petroleum: Kuwait Petroleum Corporation, Kuwait Petroleum International Ltd. in Kuwait Petroleum (Nederland) BV od 1. aprila 1994 do 15. aprila 2002;
Total: Total Nederland NV from 1 April 1994 to 15 April 2002 and Total SA from 1 November 1999 to 15 April 2002;
Total: Total Nederland NV od 1. aprila 1994 do 15. aprila 2002 in Total SA od 1. novembra 1999 do 15. aprila 2002;
Wintershall AG from 1 April 1994 to 31 December 1999.
Wintershall AG od 1. aprila 1994 do 31. decembra 1999.
For the infringements referred to in previous recital, the following fines are imposed:
Za kršitve, navedene v prejšnjem odstavku, so naložene naslednje globe:
Ballast Nedam: Ballast Nedam NV and Ballast Nedam Infra BV, jointly and severally: EUR 4,65 million;
Ballast Nedam: Ballast Nedam NV in Ballast Nedam Infra BV, skupno in solidarno: 4,65 milijona EUR;
BAM NBM: BAM NBM Wegenbouw BV: EUR 13,5 million, of which Koninklijke BAM Groep NV is jointly and severally liable for EUR 9 million;
BAM NBM: BAM NBM Wegenbouw BV: 13,5 milijona EUR, od katerih je Koninklijke BAM Groep NV skupno in solidarno odgovoren za 9 milijonov EUR;
BP: BP plc: EUR 0 million, of which BP Nederland BV is jointly and severally liable for EUR 0 million and BP Refining & Chemicals GmbH is jointly and severally liable for EUR 0 million;
BP: BP plc: 0 milijonov EUR, od katerih je BP Nederland BV skupno in solidarno odgovoren za 0 milijonov EUR, BP Refining & Chemicals GmbH pa skupno in solidarno odgovoren za 0 milijonov EUR;
Dura Vermeer: Vermeer Infrastructuur BV: EUR 5,4 million, of which Dura Vermeer Groep NV is jointly and severally liable for EUR 3,9 million and Dura Vermeer Infra BV is jointly and severally liable for EUR 3,45 million;
Dura Vermeer: Vermeer Infrastructuur BV: 5,4 milijona EUR, od katerih je Dura Vermeer Groep NV skupno in solidarno odgovoren za 3,9 milijona EUR, Dura Vermeer Infra BV pa skupno in solidarno odgovoren za 3,45 milijona EUR;
Esha: Esha Holding BV, Smid & Hollander BV and Esha Port Services Amsterdam BV, jointly and severally: EUR 11,5 million;
Esha: Esha Holding BV, Smid & Hollander BV in Esha Port Services Amsterdam BV, skupno in solidarno; 11,5 milijona EUR;
HBG: HBG Civiel BV: EUR 7,2 million;
HBG: HBG Civiel BV: 7,2 milijona EUR;
Heijmans: Heijmans NV and Heijmans Infrastructuur BV, jointly and severally: EUR 17,1 million;
Heijmans: Heijmans NV in Heijmans Infrastructuur BV, skupno in solidarno: 17,1 milijona EUR;
Klöckner: Klöckner Bitumen BV: EUR 10 million, of which Sideron Industrial Development BV is jointly and severally liable for EUR 9 million;
Klöckner: Klöckner Bitumen BV: 10 milijonov EUR, od katerih je Sideron Industrial Development BV skupno in solidarno odgovoren za 9 milijonov EUR;
Kuwait Petroleum: Kuwait Petroleum Corporation, Kuwait Petroleum International Ltd and Kuwait Petroleum (Nederland) BV, jointly and severally: EUR 16,632 million;
Kuwait Petroleum: Kuwait Petroleum Corporation, Kuwait Petroleum International Ltd. in Kuwait Petroleum (Nederland) BV skupno in solidarno; 16,632 milijona EUR;
KWS: Koninklijke Volker Wessels Stevin NV and Koninklijke Wegenbouw Stevin BV, jointly and severally: EUR 27,36 million;
KWS: Koninklijke Volker Wessels Stevin NV in Koninklijke Wegenbouw Stevin BV, skupno in solidarno: 27,36 milijona EUR;
Nynäs: AB Nynäs Petroleum and Nynäs Belgium AB, jointly and severally: EUR 13,5 million;
Nynäs: AB Nynäs Petroleum in Nynäs Belgium AB, skupno in solidarno: 13,5 milijona EUR;
Shell: Shell Petroleum NV, The Shell Transport and Trading Company Ltd and Shell Nederland Verkoopmaatschappij BV, jointly and severally: EUR 108 million;
Shell: Shell Petroleum NV, The Shell Transport and Trading Company Ltd in Shell Nederland Verkoopmaatschappij BV, skupno in solidarno: 108 milijonov EUR;
Total: Total Nederland NV: EUR 20,25 million, of which Total SA is jointly and severally liable for EUR 13,5 million;
Total: Total Nederland NV: 20,25 milijonov EUR, od katerih je Total SA skupno in solidarno odgovoren za 13,5 milijona EUR;
Wintershall AG: EUR 11,625 million.
Wintershall AG: 11,625 milijona EUR.
The undertakings listed above shall immediately bring to an end the infringements referred to in recital 28, insofar as they have not already done so.
Zgoraj našteta podjetja morajo takoj prenehati s kršitvami, navedenimi v odstavku 28, če tega doslej še niso storila.
They shall refrain from repeating any act or conduct described in recital 28, and from any act or conduct having the same or similar object or effect.
Vzdržijo se ponovitve katerega koli delovanja ali ravnanja, opisanega v odstavku 28, in katerega koli delovanja ali ravnanja z enakim ali podobnim ciljem oziroma učinkom.
A non-confidential version of the Decision will be available in the authentic languages of the case on the Competition DG website at: http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/index_en.html
Različica besedila odločbe, ki ni zaupna, bo na voljo v verodostojnih jezikih primera na spletni strani Generalnega direktorata za konkurenco na naslovu: http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/index_en.html
Commission Decision 86/398/EEC of 23 April 1986 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (IV/31.149 — Polypropylene, OJ L 230, 18.8.1986, p. 1) and Commission Decision 94/599/EC of 27 July 1994 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (IV/31865 — PVC II, OJ L 239, 14.9.1994, p. 14).
Odločba Komisije 86/398/EGS z dne 23. aprila 1986 v zvezi s postopkom po členu 85 Pogodbe (IV/31.149 – Polipropilen, UL L 230, 18.8.1986, str. 1) in Odločba Komisije 94/599/ES z dne 27. julija 1994 v zvezi s postopkom po členu 85 Pogodbe EGS (IV/31865 – PVC II, UL L 239, 14.9.1994, str. 14).
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1419/2006 (OJ L 269, 28.9.2006, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1419/2006 (UL L 269, 28.9.2006, str. 1).
The Commission considers that, given the circumstances of the case, no multiplier is necessary to ensure a sufficient deterrent effect of the fines for these undertakings with worldwide turnovers of less than EUR 10 billion.
Komisija meni, da glede na okoliščine primera za ta podjetja s svetovnim prometom, manjšim od 10 milijard EUR, ni potreben množitelj za zagotovitev zadostnega odvračilnega učinka glob.
The Commission considers only multiplying the fine for Shell, BP, Total and Kuwait Petroleum with a factor that has been adapted to the circumstances of the case.
Komisija namerava pomnožiti le globo za Shell, BP, Total in Kuwait Petroleum s koeficientom, ki je bil prilagojen okoliščinam primera.
terminating the anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports of dihydromyrcenol originating in India
o zaključku protisubvencijskega postopka glede uvoza dihidromircenola s poreklom iz Indije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Article 14 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2026/97 z dne 6. oktobra 1997 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 14 Uredbe,