natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Regulation as last amended by the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded (OJ L 157, 21.6.2005, p. 203).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Aktom o pogojih pristopa Republike Bolgarije in Romunije in prilagoditvah Pogodb, na katerih temelji Evropska unija (UL L 157, 21.6.2005, str. 203).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 922/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 922/2007
derogating from Regulation (EC) No 1227/2000 as regards transitional arrangement concerning the financial allocations for Bulgaria and Romania for the restructuring and conversion
o odstopanju od Uredbe (ES) št. 1227/2000 glede prehodne ureditve za finančna sredstva, dodeljena Bolgariji in Romuniji za prestrukturiranje in adaptacijo
Articles 16 and 17 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1227/2000 of 31 May 2000 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine, as regards production potential [2] lay down the rules on financing the restructuring and conversion scheme.
Člena 16 in 17 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1227/2000 z dne 31. maja 2000 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1493/1999 o skupni ureditvi trga za vino v zvezi z obsegom vinogradniških površin [2] določata pravila glede financiranja sheme prestrukturiranja in adaptacije.
For the 2007 financial year, funding allocations have been allocated to Bulgaria and Romania under Commission Decision 2007/381/EC of 1 June 2007 fixing, for the 2006/2007 marketing year and in respect of a certain number of hectares, an indicative financial allocation for Bulgaria and Romania for the restructuring and conversion of vineyards under Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 [3].
Za finančno leto 2007 so bila finančna sredstva dodeljena Bolgariji in Romuniji v skladu z Odločbo Komisije 2007/381/ES z dne 1. junija 2007 o določitvi okvirnih finančnih sredstev Bolgariji in Romuniji za tržno leto 2006/2007 in za določeno število hektarov za prestrukturiranje in preusmeritev vinogradov v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1493/1999 [3].
Article 16 and 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1227/2000 provide in particular that the appropriations allocated to a Member State whose corresponding expenditure was not incurred or validated by 30 June is to be reallocated to the Member States whose incurred and validated expenditure equals the allocation awarded to them.
Člena 16 in 17 Uredbe (ES) št. 1227/2000 zlasti določata, da se odobrena proračunska sredstva, dodeljena državi članici, katere ustrezni izdatki niso nastali ali bili potrjeni do 30. junija, prerazporedijo na države članice, katerih dejansko nastali in potrjeni izdatki so enaki finančnim sredstvom, ki so jim bila dodeljena.
Those Articles also provide for the amounts awarded to the Member States to be reduced for the following financial year if the expenditure incurred by them on 30 June is less than 75 % of their initial allocations.
Ta dva člena tudi določata, da se zneski, dodeljeni državam članicam, znižajo za naslednje finančno leto, če so stroški, ki so jih te države članice imele do 30. junija, nižji od 75 % prvotno dodeljenih sredstev.
Bulgaria and Romania, for which the 2006/2007 wine year is the first year of application of the restructuring and conversion scheme, are not able to use up most of their initial allocation by 30 June.
Bolgarija in Romunija, za kateri je vinsko leto 2006/2007 prvo leto uporabe sheme prestrukturiranja in adaptacije, nista zmožni porabiti večine svojih prvotno dodeljenih finančnih sredstev do 30. junija.
Application of Articles 16 and 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1227/2000 would result in excessive reductions in the appropriations available to those Member States for restructuring and conversion in the current and the next financial year.
Uporaba členov 16 in 17 Uredbe (ES) št. 1227/2000 bi pomenila preveliko znižanje odobrenih proračunskih sredstev, ki so na voljo tema državama članicama za prestrukturiranje in adaptacijo v tekočem in naslednjem finančnem letu.
Therefore, on a transitional basis, for the 2006/2007 wine year, these excessive reductions are to be avoided, by way of derogation from Regulation (EC) No 1227/2000, by allowing Bulgaria and Romania to pay out, by the end of the current financial year, 90 % of their initial allocation for the 2006/2007 wine year and by exempting them from the reduction of their initial allocation in the subsequent wine year.
Z odstopanjem od Uredbe (ES) št. 1227/2000 se je zato za vinsko leto 2006/2007 temu pretiranemu znižanju treba prehodno izogniti, tako da se dovoli Bolgariji in Romuniji, da do konca tekočega finančnega leta izplačata 90 % svojih prvotno dodeljenih finančnih sredstev za vinsko leto 2006/2007, in da se v naslednjem vinskem letu njuna prvotno dodeljena finančna sredstva izvzamejo iz znižanja.
A similar provision was introduced in 2001 and in 2005 when the vineyard restructuring and conversion scheme was first applied by the Member States concerned.
Podobna določba je bila uvedena v letih 2001 in 2005, ko so zadevne države članice prvič uporabile shemo za prestrukturiranje in adaptacijo vinogradov.
As the inability of the Member States concerned to spend their initial allocation could also be due to the late publication of the decision providing for the initial allocations, the option of using up these allocations must be fixed at the same high level as in 2005.
Ker je mogoče, da zadevni državi članici ne bosta mogli porabiti svojih prvotno dodeljenih finančnih sredstev tudi zaradi pozne objave odločbe, ki določa prvotno dodeljena finančna sredstva, je treba določiti možni obseg porabe teh dodeljenih finančnih sredstev na enako visoki ravni kot leta 2005.
By way of derogation from Article 16(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1227/2000 and as concerns the 2007 financial year, Bulgaria and Romania may apply to the Commission, not later than 10 July 2007, for a further contribution to expenditure in the 2007 financial year above that notified to the Commission under Article 16(1)(a) and (b) of that Regulation, and up to 90 % of the financial allocation awarded to them by Decision 2007/381/EC.
Z odstopanjem od člena 16(1)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 1227/2000 lahko za finančno leto 2007 Bolgarija in Romunija do najpozneje 10. julija 2007 Komisijo zaprosita za dodatno financiranje izdatkov za finančno leto 2007, poleg tistega, ki je bilo uradno prijavljeno pri Komisiji v skladu s členom 16(1)(a) in (b) navedene uredbe, in to za največ 90 % finančnih sredstev, ki so jima bila dodeljena na podlagi Odločbe 2007/381/ES.
They may pay out, not later than 15 October 2007, 90 % of their initial allocation for the 2006/2007 wine year.
Do najpozneje 15. oktobra 2007 lahko izplačata 90 % svojih prvotno dodeljenih finančnih sredstev za vinsko leto 2006/2007.
By way of derogation from Article 17(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1227/2000, applications for further funding sent to the Commission under Article 16(1)(c) of that Regulation by other Member States than Bulgaria and Romania shall be accepted on a pro-rata basis by using the available appropriations once the amounts for all Member States notified under Article 16(1)(a) and (b) of that Regulation and the amounts notified by Bulgaria and Romania under Article 16(1)(a), (b) of that Regulation and under paragraph 1 of this Article, have together been deducted.
Z odstopanjem od člena 17(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1227/2000 se zahtevki za dodatno financiranje, ki jih pošljejo Komisiji na podlagi člena 16(1)(c) navedene uredbe ostale države članice razen Bolgarije in Romunije, odobrijo na podlagi sorazmerja z uporabo odobrenih proračunskih sredstev, ki so na voljo po tem, ko se odštejejo zneski za vse države članice, ki jih te prijavijo v skladu s členom 16(1)(a) in (b) navedene Uredbe, in zneski, ki jih prijavita Bolgarija in Romunija v skladu s členom 16(1)(a) in (b) navedene Uredbe ter odstavkom 1 tega člena.
By way of derogation from Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1227/2000 and as concerns the 2007 financial year, no reduction is applicable to Bulgaria and Romania as regards their initial allocation for the subsequent wine year.
Z odstopanjem od člena 17(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1227/2000 se za finančno leto 2007 za Bolgarijo in Romunijo ne znižajo njuna prvotno dodeljena finančna sredstva za naslednje vinsko leto.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 923/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 923/2007
amending Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 as regards certain deadlines for the distillation of the by-products of winemaking
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1623/2000 glede nekaterih rokov za destilacijo stranskih proizvodov pri proizvodnji vina
Articles 45, 59 and 61 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 of 25 July 2000 laying down detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine with regard to market mechanisms [2] set certain dates for the distillation of the by-products of winemaking.
Členi 45, 59 in 61 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1623/2000 z dne 25. julija 2000 o določitvi podrobnih izvedbenih pravil za Uredbo (ES) št. 1493/1999 o skupni ureditvi trga za vino ob upoštevanju tržnih mehanizmov [2] določajo nekatere roke za destilacijo stranskih proizvodov pri proizvodnji vina.
In view of the fact that there are few distilleries in some Member States, they are experiencing practical difficulties in completing distillation by the deadlines laid down.
Glede na to, da v nekaterih državah članicah obstaja malo destilarn, imajo te države članice praktične težave z zaključitvijo destilacije v predvidenih rokih.
Those deadlines should therefore be extended.
Navedene roke je zato treba podaljšati.
Since the deadline for the delivery of by-products to distilleries provided for in the existing legislation is 15 July of the wine year in progress, this Regulation should apply from 15 July 2007.
Ker je v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo rok za dostavo stranskih proizvodov v destilarne za tekoče vinsko leto 15. julij, je treba določiti, da se ta uredba uporablja od 15. julija 2007.
The fourth subparagraph of Article 45(1) is replaced by the following:
Četrti pododstavek člena 45(1) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘As an exception to the first subparagraph, for the 2004/2005, 2005/2006 and 2006/2007 wine years the date referred to therein shall be postponed to 31 August of the following wine year.’;
„Z odstopanjem od prvega pododstavka se za vinska leta 2004/2005, 2005/2006 in 2006/2007 rok, določen v prvem pododstavku, podaljša do 31. avgusta naslednjega vinskega leta.“
The third subparagraph of Article 59 is replaced by the following:
V členu 59 se tretji odstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘As an exception to the first paragraph, for the 2004/2005, 2005/2006 and 2006/2007 wine years the date referred to therein shall be postponed to 15 September of the following wine year.’;
„Z odstopanjem od prvega odstavka se za vinska leta 2004/2005, 2005/2006 in 2006/2007 rok iz navedenega odstavka podaljša do 15. septembra naslednjega vinskega leta.“
The second subparagraph of Article 61(3) is replaced by the following:
Drugi pododstavek člena 61(3) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘However, for the 2004/2005, 2005/2006 and 2006/2007 wine years the date referred to in the first subparagraph shall be postponed to 15 September of the following wine year.’
„Vendar pa se za vinska leta 2004/2005, 2005/2006 in 2006/2007 rok iz prvega pododstavka podaljša do 15. septembra naslednjega vinskega leta.“
It shall apply from 15 July 2007.
Ta uredba se uporablja od 15. julija 2007.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 897/2007(OJ L 196, 28.7.2007, p. 20).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 897/2007 (UL L 196, 28.7.2007, str. 20).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 924/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 924/2007
amending Regulation (EC) No 918/2007 fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 1 August 2007
o popravku Uredbe (ES) št. 918/2007 o določitvi uvoznih dajatev v sektorju žit od 1. avgusta 2007
The import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 1 August 2007 were fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 918/2007 [3].
Uvozne dajatve v sektorju žit, ki se uporabljajo od 1. avgusta 2007, so bile določene z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 918/2007 [3].
As the average of the import duties calculated differs by more than EUR 5 a tonne from that fixed, a corresponding adjustment must be made to the import duties fixed by Regulation (EC) No 918/2007.
Ker izračunano povprečje uvoznih dajatev odstopa za 5 EUR/t od določene dajatve, je potrebna prilagoditev uvoznih dajatev, določenih v Uredbi (ES) št. 918/2007.
Regulation (EC) No 918/2007 should therefore be amended accordingly,
V skladu s tem je treba spremeniti Uredbo (ES) št. 918/2007 –
Annexes I and II to Regulation (EC) No 918/2007 are hereby replaced by the text in the Annex to this Regulation.
Prilogi I in II k Uredbi (ES) št. 918/2007 se nadomestita z besedilom iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
OJ L 200, 1.8.2007, p. 41.
UL L 200, 1.8.2007, str. 41.
Import duties on the products referred to in Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 applicable from 2 August 2007
Uvozne dajatve za proizvode iz člena 10(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1784/2003, ki se uporabljajo od 2. avgusta 2007
Council Regulation (EC) No 925/2007
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 925/2007
amending Regulation (EC) No 397/2004 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of cotton-type bed linen originating in Pakistan
o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 397/2004 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve pri uvozu bombažnega posteljnega perila s poreklom iz Pakistana
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/1996 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation),
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/1996 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“),
Having regard to Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 397/2004 of 2 March 2004 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of cotton-type bed linen originating in Pakistan [2],
ob upoštevanju člena 1(4) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 397/2004 z dne 2. marca 2004 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve pri uvozu bombažnega posteljnega perila s poreklom iz Pakistana [2],
By Regulation (EC) No 397/2004 the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports into the Community of cotton-type bed linen falling within CN codes ex63022100 (TARIC codes 6302210081, 6302210089), ex63022290 (TARIC code 6302229019), ex63023100 (TARIC code 6302310090) and ex63023290 (TARIC code 6302329019), originating in Pakistan.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 397/2004 uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz bombažnega posteljnega perila s poreklom iz Pakistana v Skupnost, ki se uvršča pod oznake ex63022100 (oznaki TARIC 6302210081, 6302210089), ex63022290 (oznaka TARIC 6302229019), ex63023100 (oznaka TARIC 6302310090) in ex63023290 (oznaka TARIC 6302329019).
A countrywide anti-dumping duty of 13,1 % was imposed on all companies exporting the product concerned to the Community.
Protidampinška dajatev na ravni države v višini 13,1 % je bila uvedena za vse družbe, ki izvažajo zadevni izdelek v Skupnost.
In May 2006, following an ex officio partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 695/2006, amended Regulation (EC) No 397/2004 and established new duty rates ranging from 0 % to 8,5 %.
Po delnem vmesnem pregledu po uradni dolžnosti v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe je Svet maja 2006 z Uredbo (ES) št. 695/2006 spremenil Uredbo (ES) št. 397/2004 in določil nove stopnje dajatve med 0 % in 8,5 %.
Given the large number of cooperating exporting producers a sample was established.
Glede na veliko število sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je bil uveden vzorec.
The companies selected in the sample were attributed the individual duty rates established during the review investigation, while other co-operating companies not included in the sample were attributed the weighted average duty rate of 5,8 %.
Družbam, izbranim v vzorec, so bile dodeljene individualne stopnje dajatve, določene v preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom, sodelujočim družbam, ki v vzorec niso bile vključene, pa je bila dodeljena tehtana povprečna stopnja dajatve v višini 5,8 %.
A duty rate of 8,5 % was imposed on companies which either did not make themselves known or did not co-operate in the investigation.
Stopnja dajatve 8,5 % je bila uvedena za družbe, ki se niso javile ali niso sodelovale v preiskavi.
Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 397/2004 gives the possibility to Pakistani exporting producers which meet the three criteria set out in the same Article to be granted the same treatment as the co-operating companies not included in the sample (new exporting producer treatment or NEPT).
Člen 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 397/2004 pakistanskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki so izpolnili tri merila iz tega člena, omogoča, da se jih obravnava enako kot sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec („status novega proizvajalca izvoznika“ ali „SNPI“).
NEW EXPORTING PRODUCERS' REQUESTS
ZAHTEVE NOVIH PROIZVAJALCEV IZVOZNIKOV
Eighteen Pakistani companies requested to be granted NEPT.
SNPI je zahtevalo osemnajst pakistanskih družb.
An examination was carried out to determine whether each applicant fulfils the criteria for being granted NEPT as set out in Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 397/2004, by verifying that:
Za ugotovitev, ali vsi vložniki izpolnjujejo merila za odobritev SNPI iz člena 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 397/2004, je bilo s preiskavo preverjeno, da:
it did not export to the Community the products described in recital (1) above in the period between 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004,
v obdobju od 1. aprila 2003 do 31. marca 2004 v Skupnost niso izvažali izdelkov, navedenih v uvodni izjavi 1,
it is not related to any of the exporters or producers subject to the measures imposed by that Regulation, and
niso povezani s katerim koli izvoznikom ali proizvajalcem, za katerega veljajo ukrepi, uvedeni s to uredbo, in
it has actually exported to the Community the product concerned after the investigation period on which the measures are based, or it has entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export a significant quantity to the Community.
je vložnik zadevni izdelek dejansko izvažal v Skupnost po obdobju preiskave, na kateri temeljijo ukrepi, ali da je prevzel nepreklicno pogodbeno obveznost, da izvozi znatno količino v Skupnost.
A questionnaire was sent to all applicants who were asked to supply evidence to demonstrate that they met the three criteria mentioned above.
Vsem vložnikom je bil poslan vprašalnik, obenem pa so bili zaprošeni, da predložijo dokaze o izpolnjevanju zgoraj navedenih meril.
Exporting producers fulfilling these three criteria may be granted the duty rate applicable to the co-operating companies not included in the sample, i.e. 5,8 %, pursuant to Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 397/2004.
Proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki so izpolnili ta tri merila, se lahko v skladu s členom 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 397/2004 odobri stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec, in sicer v višini 5,8 %.
Companies having submitted incomplete replies
Družbe, ki so poslale nepopolno izpolnjene vprašalnike
Eight Pakistani companies requesting NEPT did not reply to the initial questionnaire.
Osem pakistanskih družb, ki so zahtevale SNPI, na prvotni vprašalnik ni odgovorilo.
It was therefore not possible to verify whether these companies fulfilled the criteria set out in Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 397/2004, and their request had to be rejected.
Zato ni bilo mogoče preveriti, ali so izpolnile merila iz člena 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 397/2004 in njihov zahtevek je bilo treba zavrniti.
These companies were informed that their application would not be considered any further, and were given the opportunity to comment.
Te družbe so bile obveščene, da njihovi zahtevki ne bodo upoštevani, in imele so možnost predložitve pripomb.
Three Pakistani companies having not fully replied to the questionnaire did not reply to the requests for further clarification.
Tri pakistanske družbe, ki vprašalnika niso izpolnile v celoti, se niso odzvale na zahteve po nadaljnji razjasnitvi.
Consequently it was not possible to analyse the replies of these companies and verify whether they fulfilled the criteria set out in Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 397/2004.
Zato ni bilo mogoče analizirati odgovorov teh družb in preveriti, ali so izpolnile merila iz člena 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 397/2004.
Their requests were therefore rejected.
Zato so bili njihovi zahtevki zavrnjeni.
Companies having submitted a complete reply
Družbe, ki so poslale v celoti izpolnjene vprašalnike
For four Pakistani exporting producers, the examination of the information submitted showed that they had provided sufficient evidence to prove that they meet the three criteria set out in Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 397/2004.
Preiskava predloženih informacij je pokazala, da so štirje pakistanski proizvajalci izvozniki predložili zadostne dokaze o izpolnjevanju teh meril iz člena 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 397/2004.
Therefore these four producers can be granted the duty rate applicable to the cooperating companies not included in the sample (i.e. 5,8 %) in accordance with Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 397/2004 and be added to the list of exporting producers in the Annex to that Regulation.
Zato se lahko tem štirim proizvajalcem v skladu s členom 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 397/2004 odobri stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec, (tj. 5,8 %) in se jih doda na seznam proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Priloge k navedeni uredbi.
One Pakistani company was unable to prove that it had either exported the product concerned to the EC after the IP, or that it had evidence of irrevocable contractual obligations to export a significant quantity to the Community.
Ena pakistanska družba ni mogla dokazati, da je zadevni izdelek izvažala v ES po OP ali da je prevzela nepreklicno pogodbeno obveznost za izvoz znatne količine v Skupnost.
This company had exported products claimed to be the product concerned since the IP, but had not declared their exports as being the product concerned under the CN codes listed in recital (1) above.
Ta družba je v OP izvažala izdelke, pri katerih naj bi šlo za zadevni izdelek, vendar pa svojega izvoza ni prijavila kot zadevni izdelek, ki se uvršča pod oznake KN iz uvodne izjave 1.
This company was requested to submit additional evidence supporting their claim that this shipment was indeed the product concerned.
Družba je bila pozvana, da predloži dodatne dokaze v podporo svoji trditvi, da je šlo pri pošiljki dejansko za zadevni izdelek.
No additional supporting evidence has been submitted.
Predloženi niso bili nobeni dodatni dokazi.
This company was informed that if they failed to submit any further evidence their application would not be considered any further, and was given the opportunity to comment.
Družba je bila obveščena, da se njihov zahtevek ne bo upošteval, če ne predložijo dodatnih dokazov, in da lahko posreduje svoje pripombe.
Therefore, it could not be established with certainty whether this company had exported the product concerned after the IP as set out in the third criterion in Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 397/2004, and its request for NEPT had therefore to be rejected.
Ker ni bilo mogoče zagotovo ugotoviti, ali je ta družba zadevni izdelek izvažala po OP, kot zahteva tretje merilo iz člena 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 397/2004, je bilo treba zahtevek za SNPI zavrniti.
One Pakistani company was unable to submit sufficient evidence to support its claim of not having exported the product concerned during the original IP.
Ena pakistanska družba ni predložila zadostnih dokazov v podporo svoji trditvi, da med prvotnim OP zadevnega izdelka ni izvažala.
The company did not submit detailed evidence of its sales activity during and prior to the IP although repetitively requested to do so for the purpose of this investigation.
Družba ni predložila podrobnih dokazov o svoji prodaji med in pred OP, čeprav je bila večkrat pozvana, da za namen te preiskave to stori.