natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission shall support, through the relevant Member State authority, the owners/operators of designated ECIs by providing access to available best practices and methodologies as well as support training and the exchange of information on new technical developments related to critical infrastructure protection.
Komisija prek zadevnega organa države članice podpira lastnike/upravljavce določenih EKI z zagotavljanjem dostopa do razpoložljivih najboljših praks in metodologij ter s podpiranjem usposabljanja in izmenjave informacij o najnovejšem tehničnem napredku, povezanem z zaščito kritične infrastrukture.
Sensitive European critical infrastructure protection-related information
Občutljive informacije, povezane z zaščitoevropske kritične infrastrukture
Any person handling classified information pursuant to this Directive on behalf of a Member State or the Commission shall have an appropriate level of security vetting.
Vsaka oseba, ki obravnava tajne podatke v skladu s to direktivo v imenu države članice ali Komisije, mora biti ustrezno varnostno preverjena.
Member States, the Commission and relevant supervisory bodies shall ensure that sensitive European critical infrastructure protection-related information submitted to the Member States or to the Commission is not used for any purpose other than the protection of critical infrastructures.
Države članice, Komisija in zadevni nadzorni organi zagotovijo, da se občutljive informacije, povezane z zaščito evropske kritične infrastrukture, ki se predložijo državam članicam ali Komisiji, uporabljajo le za namene zaščite kritičnih infrastruktur.
This Article shall also apply to non-written information exchanged during meetings at which sensitive subjects are discussed.
Ta člen se uporablja tudi za ustne informacije, izmenjane na sestankih, na katerih se obravnavajo občutljiva vprašanja.
European critical infrastructure protection contact points
Kontaktne točke za zaščito evropske kritične infrastrukture
Each Member State shall appoint a European critical infrastructure protection contact point (‘ECIP contact point’).
Vsaka država članica imenuje kontaktno točko za zaščito evropske kritične infrastrukture („kontaktne točke ZEKI“).
ECIP contact points shall coordinate European critical infrastructure protection issues within the Member State, with other Member States and with the Commission.
Kontaktna točka ZEKI usklajuje vprašanja zaščite evropske kritične infrastrukture v državi članici z drugimi državami članicami in Komisijo.
The appointment of an ECIP contact point does not preclude other authorities in a Member State from being involved in European critical infrastructure protection issues.
Imenovanje kontaktne točke za zaščito EKI ne izključuje možnosti sodelovanja drugih organov države članice pri vprašanjih, povezanih z zaščito evropske kritične infrastrukture.
A review of this Directive shall begin on 12 January 2012.
Pregled te direktive se začne 12. januarja 2012.
Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with this Directive by 12 January 2011.
Države članice sprejmejo predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do 12. januarja 2011.
They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof and communicate the text of those measures and their correlation with this Directive.
O tem takoj obvestijo Komisijo ter ji pošljejo besedila predpisov in njihovo korelacijo s to direktivo.
OJ C 116, 26.5.2007, p. 1.
UL C 116, 26.5.2007, str. 1.
List of ECI sectors
Seznam EKI sektorjev
Infrastructures and facilities for generation and transmission of electricity in respect of supply electricity
Infrastruktura in obrati za pridobivanje in prenos električne energije v zvezi z dobavo električne energije
Oil production, refining, treatment, storage and transmission by pipelines
Proizvodnja, rafiniranje, predelava, skladiščenje in prenos nafte prek naftovodov
Gas production, refining, treatment, storage and transmission by pipelines
Proizvodnja, rafiniranje, predelava, skladiščenje in prenos plina prek plinovodov
LNG terminals
Terminali za UZP
II Transport
II Prevoz
Air transport
Letalski prevoz
Ocean and short-sea shipping and ports
Čezoceanski prevoz in pomorski prevoz na kratke razdalje ter pristanišča
The identification by the Member States of critical infrastructures which may be designated as ECIs is undertaken pursuant to Article 3.
Države članice v skladu s členom 3 opredelijo kritično infrastrukturo, ki je lahko določena kot EKI.
Therefore the list of ECI sectors in itself does not generate a generic obligation to designate an ECI in each sector.
Zato sam seznam EKI sektorjev ne predstavlja splošne obveznosti za določanje EKI v vsakem sektorju.
ECI OSP PROCEDURE
POSTOPEK VNU EKI
The OSP will identify critical infrastructure assets and which security solutions exist or are being implemented for their protection.
V VNU se bodo navedle zmogljivosti kritične infrastrukture in varnostni ukrepi, ki že obstajajo ali se izvajajo za njihovo zaščito.
The ECI OSP procedure will cover at least:
Postopek VNU EKI bo obsegal najmanj:
identification of important assets;
opredelitev pomembnih infrastrukturnih zmogljivosti;
conducting a risk analysis based on major threat scenarios, vulnerability of each asset, and potential impact; and
izvedbo analize tveganja, ki temelji na scenarijih večjih nevarnosti, šibkih točkah posamezne infrastrukturne zmogljivosti in morebitnih posledicah; in
identification, selection and prioritisation of counter-measures and procedures with a distinction between:
ugotavljanje, izbiro in prednostno razvrstitev protiukrepov in postopkov z razlikovanjem med:
permanent security measures, which identify indispensable security investments and means which are relevant to be employed at all times.
stalnimi varnostnimi ukrepi, ki zajemajo nujna vlaganja v varnost in sredstva, ki bi bila primerna, da se uporabijo ob vseh priložnostih.
This heading will include information concerning general measures such as technical measures (including installation of detection, access control, protection and prevention means); organisational measures (including procedures for alerts and crisis management); control and verification measures; communication; awareness raising and training; and security of information systems,
Ta postavka bo vključevala informacije o splošnih ukrepih, na primer o tehničnih ukrepih (vključno z namestitvijo sredstev za odkrivanje, nadzor dostopa, zaščito in preprečevanje); organizacijskih ukrepih (vključno s postopki za opozarjanje in krizno upravljanje); ukrepih za nadzor in preverjanje; komunikaciji; ozaveščanju in usposabljanju; in varnosti informacijskih sistemov,
graduated security measures, which can be activated according to varying risk and threat levels.
stopnjevanimi varnostnimi ukrepi, ki se lahko uvedejo glede na različne stopnje tveganja in nevarnosti.
Procedure for the identification by the Member States of critical infrastructures which may be designated as an ECI pursuant to Article 3
Postopek za ugotavljanje kritične infrastrukture, ki jo lahko države članice na podlagi člena 3 določijo za EKI
Article 3 requires each Member State to identify the critical infrastructures which may be designated as an ECI.
Člen 3 od vsake države članice zahteva, da ugotovi kritično infrastrukturo, ki se lahko določi za EKI.
This procedure shall be implemented by each Member State through the following series of consecutive steps.
Države članice ta postopek izvedejo na podlagi naslednjih zaporednih korakov.
A potential ECI which does not satisfy the requirements of one of the following sequential steps is considered to be ‘non-ECI’ and is excluded from the procedure.
Potencialna EKI, ki ne izpolnjuje zahtev, navedenih v enem od naslednjih zaporednih korakov, velja kot „neustrezna za EKI“ in se izloči iz postopka.
A potential ECI which does satisfy the requirements shall be subjected to the next steps of this procedure.
Za potencialno EKI, ki zadostuje zahtevam, veljajo naslednji koraki tega postopka.
Each Member State shall apply the sectoral criteria in order to make a first selection of critical infrastructures within a sector.
Vsaka država članica za prvi izbor kritične infrastrukture znotraj sektorja uporabi sektorska merila.
Each Member State shall apply the definition of critical infrastructure pursuant to Article 2(a) to the potential ECI identified under step 1.
Vsaka država članica v zvezi s potencialno EKI, določeno v koraku 1, uporabi opredelitev kritične infrastrukture v skladu s členom 2(a).
The significance of the impact will be determined either by using national methods for identifying critical infrastructures or with reference to the cross-cutting criteria, at an appropriate national level.
Resnost posledic bo določena z uporabo nacionalnih metod za ugotavljanje kritične infrastrukture ali glede na medsektorska merila na ustrezni državni ravni.
For infrastructure providing an essential service, the availability of alternatives, and the duration of disruption/recovery will be taken into account.
Za infrastrukturo, ki zagotavlja osnovno storitev, se upoštevata tudi razpoložljivost alternativ in trajanje okvare/obnove.
Each Member State shall apply the transboundary element of the definition of ECI pursuant to Article 2(b) to the potential ECI that has passed the first two steps of this procedure.
Vsaka država članica uporabi čezmejni element opredelitve EKI v skladu s členom 2(b) za potencialno EKI, ki je prestala prva dva koraka tega postopka.
A potential ECI which does satisfy the definition will follow the next step of the procedure.
Potencialna EKI, ki opredelitvi zadostuje, bo podvržena naslednjemu koraku tega postopka.
Each Member State shall apply the cross-cutting criteria to the remaining potential ECIs.
Vsaka država članica za preostalo potencialno EKI uporabi medsektorska merila.
The cross-cutting criteria shall take into account: the severity of impact; and, for infrastructure providing an essential service, the availability of alternatives; and the duration of disruption/recovery.
Medsektorska merila upoštevajo tudi: resnost vpliva; razpoložljivost alternativnih možnosti za infrastrukturo, ki zagotavlja osnovno storitev; in trajanje okvare/obnove.
A potential ECI which does not satisfy the cross-cutting criteria will not be considered to be an ECI.
Potencialna EKI, ki ne zadostuje medsektorskim merilom, ne bo obravnavana kot EKI.
A potential ECI which has passed through this procedure shall only be communicated to the Member States which may be significantly affected by the potential ECI.
O potencialni EKI, ki je bila predmet tega postopka, so obveščene samo države članice, za katere bi ta EKI lahko imela hujše posledice.
Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2008/115/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals
o skupnih standardih in postopkih v državah članicah za vračanje nezakonito prebivajočih državljanov tretjih držav
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 63(3)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 63(3)(b) Pogodbe,
The Tampere European Council of 15 and 16 October 1999 established a coherent approach in the field of immigration and asylum, dealing together with the creation of a common asylum system, a legal immigration policy and the fight against illegal immigration.
Evropski svet v Tampereju 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 je vzpostavil usklajen pristop na področju priseljevanja in azila, ki istočasno obravnava oblikovanje skupnega azilnega sistema, zakonito politiko priseljevanja in boj proti nezakonitemu priseljevanju.
The Brussels European Council of 4 and 5 November 2004 called for the establishment of an effective removal and repatriation policy, based on common standards, for persons to be returned in a humane manner and with full respect for their fundamental rights and dignity.
Evropski svet v Bruslju 4. in 5. novembra 2004 je pozval k ustanovitvi učinkovite politike odstranitev in repatriacije, ki temelji na skupnih standardih, da se osebe vrnejo na human način in ob polnem spoštovanju njihovih temeljnih pravic in dostojanstva.
On 4 May 2005 the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe adopted ‘Twenty guidelines on forced return’.
Dne 4. maja 2005 je odbor ministrov Sveta Evrope sprejel „Dvajset smernic o prisilnem vračanju“.
Clear, transparent and fair rules need to be fixed to provide for an effective return policy as a necessary element of a well managed migration policy.
Za učinkovito politiko vračanja je treba kot nujen sestavni del migracijske politike z dobrim upravljanjem določiti jasna, pregledna in poštena pravila.
This Directive should establish a horizontal set of rules, applicable to all third-country nationals who do not or who no longer fulfil the conditions for entry, stay or residence in a Member State.
Ta direktiva bi morala vzpostaviti vrsto horizontalnih ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za vse državljane tretjih držav, ki ne izpolnjujejo ali ne izpolnjujejo več pogojev za vstop, bivanje ali prebivanje v državi članici.
Member States should ensure that the ending of illegal stay of third-country nationals is carried out through a fair and transparent procedure.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da se nezakonito prebivanje državljanov tretjih držav zaključi po poštenem in preglednem postopku.
According to general principles of EU law, decisions taken under this Directive should be adopted on a case-by-case basis and based on objective criteria, implying that consideration should go beyond the mere fact of an illegal stay.
V skladu s splošnimi načeli zakonodaje EU bi morale biti odločbe, izdane v skladu s to direktivo, sprejete za vsak primer posebej in bi morale temeljiti na nepristranskih merilih, pri čemer se ne bi smelo upoštevati zgolj nezakonitega prebivanja.
When using standard forms for decisions related to return, namely return decisions and, if issued, entry-ban decisions and decisions on removal, Member States should respect that principle and fully comply with all applicable provisions of this Directive.
Pri uporabi standardnih obrazcev za izdajo odločb v zvezi z vrnitvijo, kot so odločbe o vrnitvi ter, če so izdane, odločbe o prepovedi vstopa in določbe o odstranitvi, bi morale države članice upoštevati navedeno načelo in v celoti ravnati v skladu z vsemi veljavnimi določbami te direktive.
The need for Community and bilateral readmission agreements with third countries to facilitate the return process is underlined.
Poudariti je treba potrebo po sporazumih Skupnosti in dvostranskih sporazumih s tretjimi državami o ponovnem sprejemu za poenostavitev procesa vračanja.
International cooperation with countries of origin at all stages of the return process is a prerequisite to achieving sustainable return.
Mednarodno sodelovanje z državami izvora v vseh fazah procesa vračanja je predpogoj za dosego trajne vrnitve.
It is recognised that it is legitimate for Member States to return illegally staying third-country nationals, provided that fair and efficient asylum systems are in place which fully respect the principle of non-refoulement.
Priznava se, da države članice lahko zakonito vrnejo nezakonito prebivajoče državljane tretjih držav, če obstajajo pravični in učinkoviti azilni sistemi, ki v celoti upoštevajo načelo nevračanja.
In accordance with Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status [2], a third-country national who has applied for asylum in a Member State should not be regarded as staying illegally on the territory of that Member State until a negative decision on the application, or a decision ending his or her right of stay as asylum seeker has entered into force.
V skladu z Direktivo Sveta 2005/85/ES z dne 1. decembra 2005 o minimalnih standardih glede postopkov za priznanje ali odvzem statusa begunca v državah članicah [2] državljana tretje države, ki je v državi članici zaprosil za azil, ne bi smeli obravnavati kot nezakonito prebivajočega na ozemlju te države članice, dokler ne začne veljati odločba o zavrnitvi prošnje ali odločba o prenehanju pravice te osebe do statusa prosilca za azil.
Where there are no reasons to believe that this would undermine the purpose of a return procedure, voluntary return should be preferred over forced return and a period for voluntary departure should be granted.
Če ni razlogov, zaradi katerih bi lahko verjeli, da bi bil namen postopka vračanja s tem ogrožen, bi morala imeti prostovoljna vrnitev prednost pred prisilno vrnitvijo, omogočiti pa bi bilo treba tudi obdobje za prostovoljni odhod.
An extension of the period for voluntary departure should be provided for when considered necessary because of the specific circumstances of an individual case.
Kadar se zaradi posebnih okoliščin v posameznem primeru to izkaže za nujno, bi bilo treba omogočiti, da se obdobje za prostovoljni odhod podaljša.
In order to promote voluntary return, Member States should provide for enhanced return assistance and counselling and make best use of the relevant funding possibilities offered under the European Return Fund.
Za spodbujanje prostovoljne vrnitve bi morale države članice zagotoviti večjo pomoč pri vračanju in svetovanje, pa tudi kar najbolje uporabiti ustrezne možnosti financiranja, ki so na voljo v okviru Evropskega sklada za vračanje.
A common minimum set of legal safeguards on decisions related to return should be established to guarantee effective protection of the interests of the individuals concerned.
Vzpostaviti bi bilo treba skupne minimalne ukrepe pravnega varstva za odločbe v zvezi z vrnitvijo, da se zagotovi učinkovito varstvo interesov zadevnih posameznikov.
The necessary legal aid should be made available to those who lack sufficient resources.
Osebam, ki nimajo zadostnih sredstev, bi bilo treba nuditi potrebno pravno pomoč.
Member States should provide in their national legislation for which cases legal aid is to be considered necessary.
Države članice bi morale v svoji nacionalni zakonodaji določiti, v katerih primerih je potrebna pravna pomoč.
The situation of third-country nationals who are staying illegally but who cannot yet be removed should be addressed.
Obravnavati bi bilo treba položaj državljanov tretjih držav, ki prebivajo nezakonito, ampak njihova odstranitev še ni mogoča.
Their basic conditions of subsistence should be defined according to national legislation.
Osnovne pogoje za njihovo bivanje bi bilo treba določiti v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo.
In order to be able to demonstrate their specific situation in the event of administrative controls or checks, such persons should be provided with written confirmation of their situation.
Da bi lahko dokazale poseben položaj v primeru upravnih kontrol ali preverjanj, bi morale te osebe prejeti pisno potrdilo o svojem položaju.
Member States should enjoy wide discretion concerning the form and format of the written confirmation and should also be able to include it in decisions related to return adopted under this Directive.
Države članice bi morale imeti veliko svobode pri odločanju glede oblike in obrazca pisnega potrdila, ki bi ga lahko vključile tudi v odločbe v zvezi z vrnitvijo, sprejete s skladu s to direktivo.
The use of coercive measures should be expressly subject to the principles of proportionality and effectiveness with regard to the means used and objectives pursued.
Pri uporabi prisilnih ukrepov bi bilo treba izrecno upoštevati načeli sorazmernosti in učinkovitosti glede na uporabljene ukrepe in zastavljene cilje.
Minimum safeguards for the conduct of forced return should be established, taking into account Council Decision 2004/573/EC of 29 April 2004 on the organisation of joint flights for removals from the territory of two or more Member States, of third-country nationals who are subjects of individual removal orders [3].
Vzpostaviti bi bilo treba minimalne varovalne ukrepe za izvajanje prisilnega vračanja, ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 2004/573/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o organiziranju skupnih letov zaradi odstranitve državljanov tretjih držav, ki so predmet posameznih odredb o odstranitvi, z ozemlja dveh ali več držav članic [3].
Member States should be able to rely on various possibilities to monitor forced return.
Državam članicam bi morala biti omogočena uporaba različnih možnosti za spremljanje prisilnega vračanja.
The effects of national return measures should be given a European dimension by establishing an entry ban prohibiting entry into and stay on the territory of all the Member States.
Učinki nacionalnih ukrepov vračanja bi morali na podlagi uveljavljanja prepovedi vstopa, ki prepoveduje vstop v vse države članice in prebivanje na njihovem ozemlju, dobiti evropsko razsežnost.
The length of the entry ban should be determined with due regard to all relevant circumstances of an individual case and should not normally exceed five years.
Trajanje prepovedi vstopa bi bilo treba določiti ob upoštevanju vseh ustreznih okoliščin posameznega primera, običajno pa naj ne bi bila daljša od petih let.
In this context, particular account should be taken of the fact that the third-country national concerned has already been the subject of more than one return decision or removal order or has entered the territory of a Member State during an entry ban.
V tem okviru bi bilo treba posebej upoštevati dejstvo, da je bila za zadevnega državljana tretje države že izdana več kot ena odločba o vrnitvi ali odredba o odstranitvi ali da je ta državljan vstopil na ozemlje države članice med prepovedjo vstopa.
It should be for the Member States to decide whether or not the review of decisions related to return implies the power for the reviewing authority or body to substitute its own decision related to the return for the earlier decision.
Državam članicam bi moralo biti prepuščeno, da odločijo, ali pregled odločb v zvezi z vrnitvijo organ ali telo za pregled pooblašča, da predhodno odločbo nadomesti s svojo odločbo v zvezi z vrnitvijo.
The use of detention for the purpose of removal should be limited and subject to the principle of proportionality with regard to the means used and objectives pursued.
Uporaba pridržanja z namenom odstranitve bi morala biti omejena in bi morala v zvezi z uporabljenimi ukrepi in zastavljenimi cilji upoštevati načelo sorazmernosti.
Detention is justified only to prepare the return or carry out the removal process and if the application of less coercive measures would not be sufficient.
Pridržanje je upravičeno samo z namenom priprave vrnitve ali izvedbe postopka odstranitve in če uporaba milejših prisilnih ukrepov ni zadostna.
Third-country nationals in detention should be treated in a humane and dignified manner with respect for their fundamental rights and in compliance with international and national law.
S pridržanimi državljani tretjih držav bi bilo treba ravnati humano in dostojanstveno, ob spoštovanju njihovih temeljnih pravic in v skladu z mednarodnim in nacionalnim pravom.
Without prejudice to the initial apprehension by law-enforcement authorities, regulated by national legislation, detention should, as a rule, take place in specialised detention facilities.
Brez poseganja v prvo prijetje s strani organov pregona, ki ga ureja nacionalna zakonodaja, bi se moralo pridržanje praviloma izvajati v posebnih centrih za pridržanje.
Member States should have rapid access to information on entry bans issued by other Member States.
Države članice bi morale imeti hiter dostop do informacij o prepovedih vstopa, ki so jih izdale druge države članice.
This information sharing should take place in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) [4].
Ta izmenjava informacij bi morala potekati v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1987/2006 Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o vzpostavitvi, delovanju in uporabi druge generacije Schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) [4].