natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ECJ Decision in Case C-209/03, Bidar v London Borough of Ealing, Secretary of State for Education and Skills [2005] ECR I-2119, paragraph 68-69; Advocate-General Opinion in Case C-475/03, Banca Popolare di Cremona v Agenzia Entrate Ufficio Cremona [2006] ECR I-9373, paragraph 75; Advocate-General Opinion in Case C-292/04, Wienand Meilicke and others v Finanzamt Bonn-Innenstadt, not yet published, paragraph 34.
Sklep SES v zadevi C-209/03, Bidar proti London Borough of Ealing, minister za izobraževanje in znanje, ZOdl. 2005, str. I-2119, odstavka 68–69; stališče generalnega pravobranilca v zadevi C-475/03, Banca Popolare di Cremona proti Agenzia Entrate Ufficio Cremona, ZOdl. 2006, str. I-9373, odstavek 75; stališče generalnega pravobranilca v zadevi C-292/04, Wienand Meilicke in drugi proti Finančnemu uradu Bonn-Innenstadt, še neobjavljeno, odstavek 34.
Case C-6/97 Italian Republic v Commission [1999] ECR I-2981, paragraph 16.
Zadeva C-6/97, Republika Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1999, str. I-2981, odstavek 16.
Commission Decision in State aid Case No NN 59/A/98 (No SG(99) D/884 of 3 February 1999), OJ C 84, 26.3.1999, p. 7.
Odločba Komisije v primeru državne pomoči NN 59/A/98 (št. SG(99) D/884 z dne 3. februarja 1999) (UL C 84, 26.3.1999, str. 7).
In Joined Cases T-195/01 and T-207/01: Government of Gibraltar v Commission of the European Communities, [2002] ECR 2002, II-2309, paragraphs 109 and 111.
Skupni zadevi T-195/01 in T-207/01, Vlada Gibraltarja proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, Recueil 2002, str. II-2309, odstavka 109 in 111.
See footnote 78.
Glej opombo 78.
See footnote 91.
Glej opombo 91.
See footnote 81.
Glej opombo 81.
C-44/93, Namur Les Assurances du Crédit SA v Office National du Ducroire and the Belgian State, [1994] ECR I-3829, paragraph 28.
Zadeva C-44/93, Namur Les Assurances du Crédit SA proti Office National du Ducroire in državi Belgija, Recueil 1994, str. I-3829, odstavek 28.
For detailed argumentation, see Section VI.3 below.
Za podrobno utemeljitev glej poglavje VI.3 spodaj.
See footnote 79.
Glej opombo 79.
See footnote 80.
Glej opombo 80.
See footnote 82.
Glej opombo 82.
See footnote 83.
Glej opombo 83.
See footnote 84.
Glej opombo 84.
See footnote 85.
Glej opombo 85.
See Case T-349/03 Corsica Ferries v Commission [2005] ECR II-2197, paragraph 64.
Glej zadevo T-349/03, Corsica Ferries proti Komisiji, ZOdl. 2005, str. II-2197, odstavek 64.
Case C-172/03, Wolfgang Heiser v Finanzamt Innsbruck [2005] ECR I-1627.
Zadeva C-172/03, Wolfgang Heiser proti Finanzamt Innsbruck, ZOdl. 2005, str. I-1627.
Regulation replacing Regulation (EC) No 69/2001.
Uredba, ki nadomešča Uredbo (ES) št. 69/2001.
RAG, footnote 23.
RAG, opomba 23.
RAG, point 4.6.
RAG, točka 4.6.
The regional aid map for Greece has been approved by the Commission with State aid Decision N 469/1999 (Commission letter of 21 January 2000, SG(2000) D/100661) and modified with State aid Decision N 349/2002 (Commission letter of 17 July 2002, C(2002) 2604 fin) for the period 2000-2006.
Karto regionalnih pomoči za Grčijo za obdobje 2000–2006 je Komisija odobrila z odločbo o državni pomoči N 469/1999 (dopis Komisije z dne 21. januarja 2000, SG(2000) D/100661) in spremenila z odločbo o državni pomoči N 349/2002 (dopis Komisije z dne 17. julija 2002, C(2002) 2604 fin).
Community Support Framework for Greece for the period 2000-2006, Commission Decision E(2000) 3405.
Okvir podpore Skupnosti za Grčijo za obdobje 2000–2006, odločba Komisije C(2000) 3405.
That is investments concerning the protection of the environment, the restriction of ground, underground, water and air pollution, the restoration of the natural environment and water recycling.
To so naložbe, ki se nanašajo na varstvo okolja, omejevanje onesnaževanja tal, podtalnice, vode in zraka, ponovno vzpostavitev naravnega okolja in recikliranje vode.
Environmental Guidelines, point 29 in connection with point 18(b).
Točka 29 v zvezi s točko 18(b) okoljskih smernic.
WRAP environmental grant funding and WRAP lease guarantee fund.
Pomoči za varstvo okolja WRAP in sklad za lizinška jamstva WRAP.
OJ L 102, 7.4.2004, p. 59 for a general scheme on recycling investments.
UL L 102, 7.4.2004, str. 59, za splošno shemo naložb v recikliranje.
For cases in related to recycling paper C61/2002 — WRAP published in OJ L 314 of 28.11.2003, p. 26 and Stora Enso Langerbrugge published in OJ L 53, 26.2.2005, p. 66 respectively.
Za recikliranje papirja C61/2002 – WRAP, objavljeno v UL L 314, 28.11.2003, str. 26, oziroma Stora Enso Langerbrugge, objavljeno v UL L 53, 26.2.2005, str. 66.
The criteria used in these cases are also commented upon in the Annual Competition report of 2004.
Merila, uporabljena v teh primerih, so pojasnjena tudi v letnem poročilu o konkurenci za leto 2004.
Case T-176/01 Ferriere Nord v Commission [2004] ECR II-3931, paragraph 94.
Zadeva T-176/01, Ferriere Nord proti Komisiji, Recueil 2004, str. II-3931, odstavek 94.
OJ C 323 of 30.12.2006, p. 1.
UL C 323, 30.12.2006, str. 1.
Article 3.1.a.vi. et al. of Law 2601/1998.
Člen 3.1.a.vi in drugi zakona 2601/1998.
Article 3.1.p.vi. of Law 2601/1998.
Člen 3.1.p.vi zakona 2601/1998.
Article 3.1.o.i of Law 2601/1998.
Člen 3.1.o.i zakona 2601/1998.
Regulation replaced by Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 (OJ L 277, 21.10.2005, p. 1).
Uredba se nadomesti z Uredbo (ES) št. 1698/2005 (UL L 277, 21.10.2005, str. 1).
See in particular Case C-404/00 Commission v Spain [2003] ECR I-6695, paragraph 45 and Case C-415/03 Commission v Greece [2005] ECR I-3875, paragraph 35.
Glej zlasti zadevo C-404/00, Komisija proti Španiji, Recueil 2003, str. I-6695, odstavek 45, in zadevo C-415/03, Komisija proti Grčiji, ZOdl. 2005, str. I-3875, odstavek 35.
See footnote 88.
Glej opombo 86.
ECJ Judgement in Case C-209/03, Bidar v London Borough of Ealing, Secretary of State for Education and Skills [2005] ECR I-2119, para. 68-69; ECJ Judgment in Case C-292/04, Wienand Meilicke and others v Finanzamt Bonn-Innenstadt, not yet published, para. 34.
Sodba SES v zadevi C-209/03, Bidar proti London Borough of Ealing, državnemu sekretarju za izobraževanje in znanje, ZOdl. 2005, str. I-2119, odstavka 68 in 69; sodba SES v zadevi C-292/04, Wienand Meilicke in drugi proti Finančnemu uradu Bonn-Innenstadt, še neobjavljena, odstavek 34.
Case C-91/01 Italy v Commission of the European Communities [2004] ECR I-4355, paragraph 66.
Zadeva C-91/01, Italija proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, Recueil 2004, str. I-4355, odstavek 66.
Information regarding the implementation of the Commission Decision C 37/05 (ex NN 11/04), implemented by Greece, [Tax exempt reserve fund]
Informacije o tem, kako Grčija izvaja Odločbo Komisije o državni pomoči C 37/05 (ex NN 11/04) (Davkov oproščeni rezervni sklad)
Information about the amounts of aid received, to be recovered and already recovered
Informacije o prejetih višinah pomoči in zneskih, ki jih je še treba vrniti oziroma so že bili vrnjeni
Total amount of aid received under the scheme [1]
Skupna višina pomoči, prejete na podlagi sheme [1]
Total amount of aid to be recovered [1](Principal)
Skupna višina pomoči, ki jo mora vrniti [1](Glavnica)
Total amount already reimbursed [1]
Skupni znesek, ki je bil že vrnjen [1]
Recovery interest
Obresti za vračilo
(°) Million of national currency.
(°) V milijonih nacionalne valute.
Article 3.1.a.xv., e.v. (GRD 500 million), g.xii. of Law 2601/1998.
Člen 3.1.a.xv, e.v (500 milijonov drahem), g.xii zakona 2601/1998.
When doing that, the Commission has in particular to consider its previous decision — in which Law 2601/1998 was considered to be a compatible aid — as a framework that cannot be amended within this procedure. V. COMMENTS FROM GREECE V.1. Law 3220/2004 is existing aid (38) For the Greek authorities, the fact that the aid under examination was introduced by a different Law to the previous Law 2601/1998 does not suffice for it to be designated a new aid, according to the case law of the Court [76].
Po mnenju grških organov dejstvo, da je bila preučevana pomoč uvedena z drugim zakonom in ne z zakonom 2601/1998, v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča [76] ni zadosten razlog za to, da bi jo lahko imenovali nova pomoč.
those which were already entitled to form a tax-exempt reserve fund under the Law 2601/1998 scheme. In this case there is no new economic advantage so the aid should be considered an existing aid.
podjetja, ki se niso imela pravice vključiti v shemo po zakonu 2601/1998, za katera bi se ta ukrep lahko štel za novo pomoč.
Hence, the obligation to notify did not apply and there can be no recovery; those which did not have entitlement to inclusion in Law 2601/1998, for which that measure could be considered as new aid; that said, the compatibility with the provisions of the EC Treaty should be judged according to each case.
V tem primeru je združljivost z določbami Pogodbe ES treba oceniti za vsako podjetje posebej.
The MSF (2002) requires notification of all regional aid investment aid if the aid proposed exceeds the maximum allowable aid that an investment of EUR 100 million can obtain under the MSF reduced scale of the regional aid ceilings. This measure neither excludes the large investment aid, nor does it include an obligation to notify such cases individually, nor does it apply lower aid ceilings in such cases.
V skladu z okvirom MSF (2002) je treba priglasiti vse regionalne pomoči za naložbe, če predlagana pomoč presega največjo dovoljeno pomoč, ki jo je v skladu z znižano lestvico zgornjih mej za regionalno pomoč po okviru MSF mogoče prejeti za naložbo v višini 100 milijonov EUR. Ta ukrep ne izključuje pomoči za velike naložbe, ne vsebuje obveznosti priglasitve posameznih takih primerov in v takih primerih ne uporablja nižjega praga za pomoč.
of 8 September 2008
z dne 8. septembra 2008
allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for the new active substances fluopicolide and pinoxaden
o dovoljenju državam članicam za podaljšanje začasnih registracij novih aktivnih snovi fluopikolid in pinoksaden
(notified under document number C(2008) 4732)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 4732)
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in May 2004 the United Kingdom received an application from Bayer CropScience, for the inclusion of the active substance fluopicolide in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
V skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS je Združeno kraljestvo maja 2004 prejelo zahtevek od družbe Bayer CropScience za vključitev aktivne snovi fluopikolid v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Commission Decision 2005/778/EC [2] confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.
Z Odločbo Komisije 2005/778/ES [2] je bilo potrjeno, da je dokumentacija popolna ter da načeloma izpolnjuje zahteve po podatkih in informacijah iz prilog II in III k navedeni direktivi.
In March 2004 the United Kingdom received an application from Syngenta Ltd concerning pinoxaden.
Marca 2004 je Združeno kraljestvo prejelo zahtevek družbe Syngenta Ltd glede pinoksadena.
Commission Decision 2005/459/EC [3] confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.
Z Odločbo Komisije 2005/459/ES [3] je bilo potrjeno, da je dokumentacija popolna ter da načeloma izpolnjuje zahteve po podatkih in informacijah iz prilog II in III k navedeni direktivi.
Confirmation of the completeness of the dossiers was necessary in order to allow them to be examined in detail and to allow Member States the possibility of granting provisional authorisations, for periods of up to three years, for plant protection products containing the active substances concerned, while complying with the conditions laid down in Article 8(1) of Directive 91/414/EEC and, in particular, the condition relating to the detailed assessment of the active substances and the plant protection product in the light of the requirements laid down by that Directive.
Popolnost dokumentacije je bilo treba potrditi, da se omogoči njen podroben pregled in da se državam članicam omogoči izdaja začasnih registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo zadevni aktivni snovi, za največ tri leta ob izpolnjevanju pogojev iz člena 8(1) Direktive 91/414/EGS in zlasti pogoja v zvezi s podrobno oceno aktivnih snovi in fitofarmacevtskega sredstva glede na zahteve iz navedene direktive.
For these active substances, the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed, in accordance with the provisions of Article 6(2) and (4) of Directive 91/414/EEC, for the uses proposed by the applicants.
Za ti aktivni snovi so bili ocenjeni učinki na zdravje ljudi in okolje v skladu z določbami člena 6(2) in (4) Direktive 91/414/EGS za uporabe, ki sta jih predlagala vlagatelja.
The rapporteur Member State submitted the draft assessment reports to the Commission on 12 December 2005 (fluopicolide) and on 30 November 2005 (pinoxaden).
Država članica poročevalka je Komisiji 12. decembra 2005 predložila osnutke poročil o oceni za fluopikolid in 30. novembra 2005 za pinoksaden.
Following submission of the draft assessment reports by the rapporteur Member State, it has been found to be necessary to request further information from the applicants and to have the rapporteur Member State examine that information and submit its assessment.
Potem ko je država članica poročevalka predložila osnutke poročil o oceni, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je treba od vlagateljev zahtevati dodatne informacije, ki jih mora država članica poročevalka pregledati in o njih predložiti oceno.
Therefore, the examination of the dossiers is still ongoing and it will not be possible to complete the evaluation within the time frame provided for in Directive 91/414/EEC.
Zato pregled dokumentacij še vedno poteka, ocenjevanja pa ne bo mogoče zaključiti v roku iz Direktive 91/414/EGS.
As the evaluation so far has not identified any reason for immediate concern, Member States should be given the possibility of prolonging provisional authorisations granted for plant protection products containing the active substances concerned for a period of 24 months in accordance with the provisions of Article 8 of Directive 91/414/EEC so as to enable the examination of the dossiers to continue.
Ker pri ocenjevanju še ni bil ugotovljen nikakršen razlog za neposredno zaskrbljenost, je treba državam članicam v skladu z določbami člena 8 Direktive 91/414/EGS omogočiti podaljšanje začasnih registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo zadevni aktivni snovi, za obdobje 24 mesecev, da se omogoči nadaljevanje pregledovanja dokumentacije.
It is expected that the evaluation and decision-making process with respect to a decision on possible Annex I inclusion for fluopicolide and pinoxaden will have been completed within 24 months.
Pričakuje se, da bo postopek ocenjevanja in odločanja o morebitni vključitvi fluopikolida in pinoksadena v Prilogo I zaključen v 24 mesecih.
Member States may extend provisional authorisations for plant protection products containing fluopicolide or pinoxaden for a period not exceeding 24 months from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Države članice lahko podaljšajo začasne registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo fluopikolid ali pinoksaden, za največ 24 mesecev od datuma sprejetja te odločbe.
Done at Brussels, 8 September 2008.
V Bruslju, 8. septembra 2008
OJ L 293, 9.11.2005, p. 26.
UL L 293, 9.11.2005, str. 26.
OJ L 160, 23.6.2005, p. 32.
UL L 160, 23.6.2005, str. 32.
of 15 September 2008
z dne 15. septembra 2008
A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Willi STÄCHELE,
Zaradi odstopa g. Willija STÄCHELEJA se je sprostilo mesto člana Odbora regij –
The following person is hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions as a member for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2010:
V Odbor regij se za preostanek mandata, ki se izteče 25. januarja 2010, imenuje naslednji član:
Prof. Dr Wolfgang REINHART, Minister for Federal and European Affairs, Baden-Württemberg.
prof. dr. Wolfgang REINHART, minister za zvezne in evropske zadeve, Baden-Württemberg.
Done at Brussels, 15 September 2008.
V Bruslju, 15. septembra 2008
appointing an Italian member to the Committee of the Regions
o imenovanju italijanskega člana Odbora regij
A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the expiry of the mandate of Mr Francesco SCOMA,
Po izteku mandata Francesca SCOME je mesto člana Odbora regij postalo prosto,
The following is hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions as a member for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2010:
V Odbor regij se za preostanek mandata, tj. do 25. januarja 2010, imenuje naslednji član:
appointing a Slovak member and a Slovak alternate member of the Committee of the Regions
o imenovanju slovaškega člana in slovaškega nadomestnega člana Odbora regij
Having regard to the proposal of the Slovak Government,
ob upoštevanju predloga slovaške vlade,
A member’s seat has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Milan MURGAŠ of the Committee of the Regions.
Zaradi odstopa g. Milana MURGAŠA se je sprostilo mesto člana Odbora regij.
An alternate member’s seat becomes vacant following the appointment of Mr Vladimír BAJAN as a member of the Committee of the Regions,
Mesto nadomestnega člana se je sprostilo zaradi imenovanja g. Vladimírja BAJANA za člana Odbora regij –
Mr Vladimír BAJAN, predseda Bratislavského samosprávneho kraja (President of the Bratislava Self-governing Region) (change of mandate);
Vladimír BAJAN, predseda Bratislavského samosprávneho kraja (predsednik Avtonomne regije Bratislava) (sprememba mandata), in
Mr Milan MURGAŠ, predseda Banskobystrického samosprávneho kraja (President of the Banská Bystrica Self-governing Region).
Milan MURGAŠ, predseda Banskobystrického samosprávneho kraja (predsednik Avtonomne regije Banská Bystrica).
Having regard to the proposal of the Belgian Government,
ob upoštevanju predloga belgijske vlade,
A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mrs Joëlle KAPOMPOLÉ.
Zaradi odstopa ge. Joëlle KAPOMPOLÉ se je sprostilo mesto člana Odbora regij.
An alternate member’s seat has become vacant following the appointment of Mr Patrick LACHAERT as a member of the Committee of the Regions,
Mesto nadomestnega člana se je sprostilo zaradi imenovanja g. Patricka LACHAERTA za člana Odbora regij –
Mr Patrick LACHAERT, Vlaams Volksvertegenwoordiger (change of mandate);
Patrick LACHAERT, Vlaams Volksvertegenwoordiger (sprememba mandata),
on the State aid case C 53/06 (ex N 262/05, ex CP 127/04), investment by the city of Amsterdam in a fibre-to-the-home (FttH) network
o državni pomoči mestne občine Amsterdam za amsterdamsko omrežje steklenih vlaken zaradi naložbe v omrežje FTTH (omrežje kablov iz steklenih vlaken do doma) Državna pomoč C 53/06 (ex N 262/05, ex CP 127/04)
(notified under document number C(2007) 6072)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 6072)
In April 2004, the municipality of Amsterdam contacted the Commission regarding the public procurement aspects of the roll-out of a FttH (fibre-to-the-home) telecommunications access network.
Aprila 2004 je mestna občina Amsterdam navezala stik s Komisijo glede vidikov javnega naročanja pri uvedbi omrežja telekomunikacijskega dostopa FTTH (omrežje kablov iz steklenih vlaken do doma).
In addition, the municipality requested the Commission to confirm that the project did not entail State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Poleg tega je mestna občina zaprosila Komisijo za potrditev, da projekt ni pomenil državne pomoči v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
By letter of 22 July 2004, the Commission informed the municipality of Amsterdam that such a confirmation can only be given after a notification of the measure by the Dutch authorities.
Z dopisom z dne 22. julija 2004 je Komisija obvestila mestno občino Amsterdam, da bi bila takšna potrditev mogoča šele po tem, ko bi nizozemski organi priglasili ukrep.
The Commission requested the Dutch authorities on 23 July 2004 to provide any information necessary for an assessment of the measure under Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Komisija je zaprosila nizozemske organe, naj predložijo vse potrebne informacije za oceno ukrepa v skladu s členom 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
The Dutch authorities asked for an extension of the deadline in August 2004 which was accepted by the Commission on 7 September 2004.
Nizozemski organi so avgusta 2004 zaprosili za podaljšanje roka, kar je Komisija sprejela 7. septembra 2004.
In September 2004, the Dutch authorities convened with the Commission to present and discuss the plans of the municipality of Amsterdam.
Septembra 2004 so se nizozemski organi udeležili sestanka s Komisijo, da bi predstavili in obravnavali načrte mestne občine Amsterdam.
On 7 October 2004, the authorities stated in their reply to the Commission’s letter of 23 July 2004 that the project in Amsterdam would be notified in the near future.
Organi so 7. oktobra 2004 v svojem odgovoru na dopis Komisije z dne 23. julija 2004 navedli, da bodo projekt v Amsterdamu priglasili v bližnji prihodnosti.
On 17 May 2005, the Dutch authorities notified the project — the participation of the municipality of Amsterdam in an undertaking carrying out the roll-out and owning this network.
Nizozemski organi so 17. maja 2005 priglasili projekt – udeležbo mestne občine Amsterdam v podjetju, ki uvaja omrežje in je lastnik tega omrežja.
The Dutch authorities were seeking confirmation from the Commission that the investment of the municipality of Amsterdam in the legal entity owning the network is in line with the Market Economy Investor Principle (‘MEIP’) and accordingly does not constitute State aid.
Nizozemski organi so želeli potrditev Komisije, da je naložba mestne občine Amsterdam v pravno osebo, ki je lastnica omrežja, skladna z načelom vlagatelja pod tržnimi pogoji in tako ne pomeni državne pomoči.
Following further information sent by the authorities on 23 June 2005, and a meeting which took place on 28 June 2005 between representatives of the city of Amsterdam and the Commission, the Commission sent on 15 July 2005 a letter containing elements of an explanation of the application of the MEIP together with a second request for information.
Po nadaljnjih informacijah, ki so jih organi poslali 23. junija 2005, in sestanku med predstavniki mesta Amsterdam in Komisijo, organiziranem 28. junija 2005, je Komisija 15. julija 2005 poslala dopis, ki je vseboval elemente razlage o uporabi načela vlagatelja pod tržnimi pogoji, skupaj z drugim zahtevkom za informacije.
The Dutch authorities stated in a letter, registered on 18 November 2005, that there was a delay in the planning and that the municipality of Amsterdam was still working on the setup of the project and the investment conditions.
Nizozemski organi so v dopisu, evidentiranim 18. novembra 2005, navedli, da se je načrtovanje zavleklo in da mestna občina Amsterdam še vedno pripravlja vzpostavitev projekta in naložbene pogoje.
The Dutch authorities declared that they would need more time in order to provide the requested information and asked the Commission to suspend the assessment until all data would be available.
Nizozemski organi so izjavili, da bi potrebovali več časa za zagotovitev zahtevanih informacij, in zaprosili Komisijo, naj počaka z oceno, dokler ne bodo na voljo vsi podatki.