natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The applicant claimed that this was justified by the cost of establishing a new ammonia/urea plant, which would require a return on investment of 11 % (allegedly equivalent to the 36 % pre-tax profit on turnover).
Vložnik je trdil, da to upravičuje strošek vzpostavitve novega kompleksa amoniaka/sečnine, za kar bi bila potrebna 11-odstotna donosnost naložb (ki domnevno ustreza 36-odstotnemu dobičku od prometa pred obdavčitvijo).
To this purpose, it is noted that the applicant never claimed such a high target profit in this proceeding and in the original investigation a profit margin of 8 % that may be reached in the absence of injurious dumping was established.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da vložnik v tej preiskavi nikoli ni zahteval tako visokega ciljnega dobička in da je bila v prvotni preiskavi določena 8-odstotna stopnja dobička, ki je lahko dosežena brez škodljivega dampinga.
Moreover, the Court of First Instance, in its judgment in Case T-210/95, confirmed that ‘… the profit margin to be used by the Council when calculating the target price that will remove the injury in question must be limited to the profit margin which the Community industry could reasonably count on under normal conditions of competition, in the absence of the dumped imports’ [8].
Sodišče prve stopnje je v sodbi v Zadevi T-210/95 potrdilo, da „mora biti stopnja dobička, ki jo mora uporabiti Svet pri izračunu ciljne cene za odpravo zadevne škode, omejena na stopnjo dobička, ki bi jo lahko dosegla industrija Skupnosti pod normalnimi konkurenčnimi pogoji, če ne bi bilo dampinškega uvoza“ [8].
In the same case, it was confirmed that ‘… (an) argument that the profit margin which is to be used by the Community institutions must be the margin necessary to ensure the survival of the Community industry and/or an adequate return on capital, has no basis whatever in the basic regulation.’
V isti zadevi je bilo potrjeno, da „… trditev, da mora biti stopnja dobička, ki jo morajo uporabiti institucije Skupnosti, enaka stopnji, potrebni za zagotovitev preživetja industrije Skupnosti, in/ali stopnji, ki ustreza donosnosti kapitala, vsekakor ni v skladu z osnovno uredbo“.
The applicant further alleged that, in the case of the fertiliser industry, return on sales is not an appropriate indicator of injury as pertains profits, and that return on capital employed and/or return on investment are qualitatively more adequate for such an assessment.
Vložnik je nadalje trdil, da pri industriji gnojil donosnost prodaje ni primeren kazalnik škode, kar se dobička tiče, in da sta donos naložbenega kapitala in/ali donosnost naložb kvalitativno bolj primerna za takšno oceno.
Furthermore, it was argued that, on the basis of the latter indicators, the Community industry was suffering injury.
Nadalje je navedel, da ima industrija Skupnosti na podlagi zadnjih kazalnikov škodo.
Given the particular characteristics of the fertiliser industry (inter alia, its capital-intensiveness) and the nature of the fertiliser market (the volatility of its raw materials prices and of final product prices), it is agreed that return on sales, on its own, may not necessarily be the most telling indicator regarding profitability, and that it should be complemented with indicators such as return on capital employed and return on investment.
Glede na posebne značilnosti industrije gnojil (med drugim ali npr. njena kapitalna intenzivnost) in narave trga gnojil (nestanovitnost cen surovin in cen končnega izdelka) je res, da donosnost prodaje sama po sebi ni nujno najbolj zgovoren kazalnik v zvezi z dobičkonosnostjo in da jo je treba dopolniti s kazalniki, kot sta donos naložbenega kapitala in donosnost naložb.
However, the applicant has not submitted any evidence that, in the absence of the dumped imports, the Community industry would have been able to obtain returns at the level requested.
Vendar pa vložnik ni predložil dokaza, da bi bila industrija Skupnosti zmožna doseči donosnost na zahtevanih ravneh, če ne bi bilo dampinškega uvoza.
Neither did the applicant show what profit margin would have been achieved by the Community industry but for the dumped imports.
Prav tako vložnik ni dokazal, katero stopnjo dobička bi lahko industrija Skupnosti dosegla brez dampinškega uvoza.
It is therefore concluded that there was no continuation of material injury to the Community industry.
Zato se sklene, da ni bilo nadaljevanja znatne škode za industrijo Skupnosti.
Since there is no continuation of material injury caused by imports from the country concerned, the analysis focused on the likelihood of recurrence of injury should the measures be removed.
Ker uvoz iz zadevne države ni povzročil nadaljnje znatne škode, se je analiza osredotočila na verjetnost ponovnega pojava znatne škode, če bi bili ukrepi razveljavljeni.
In this respect, two main parameters were analysed: (i) possible export volumes and prices of the countries concerned and (ii) the effect of those projected volumes and prices from the countries concerned on the Community industry.
V zvezi s tem sta bila analizirana dva glavna dejavnika: (i) možen obseg izvoza in cene zadevne države ter (ii) učinek tega predvidenega obsega in cen iz zadevne države na industrijo Skupnosti.
The analysis is set against a general market context of continuing high prices and profits not only in the Community but across the world.
Ozadje analize je splošni kontekst trga, tj. visoke cene in dobički ne le v Skupnosti, temveč po vsem svetu.
To a large extent, this is due to demand outstripping supply.
V veliki meri je to posledica tega, da povpraševanje presega ponudbo.
There are no indications that such general context will vary significantly in the short to medium term.
Ni pa znakov, ki bi kazali na to, da bo ta splošen kontekst v bližnji prihodnosti znatno nihal.
Possible export volumes and prices of the countries concerned
Možni obseg izvoza in cene zadevnih držav
As already stated, Ukrainian exporting producers are likely, at most, to export around 375000 additional tonnes of urea to the Community, should measures expire.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, bodo ukrajinski proizvajalci izvozniki v Skupnost izvozili približno 375000 dodatnih ton sečnine, če se ukrepi iztečejo.
The figures for Libya and Belarus indicate at most 140000 and 150000 tonnes, respectively.
Podatki za Libijo in Belorusijo kažejo na največ 140000 in 150000 ton.
Similarly, the figures for Croatia would not be likely to increase significantly from their current level.
Podobno se podatki za Hrvaško verjetno ne bodo znatno povečali v primerjavi s sedanjo ravnjo.
Export prices to the Community and to third countries have been analysed above.
Izvozne cene za Skupnost in tretje države so bile analizirane v prejšnjih uvodnih izjavah.
Together with the market conditions described below and the likely development of key cost drivers such as gas, this analysis points to the likelihood that export prices would remain high.
Skupaj z razmerami na trgu, opisanimi spodaj, in verjetnim razvojem ključnih gonil stroškov, kot je plin, ta analiza nakazuje verjetnost, da bodo izvozne cene ostale visoke.
As a result, it cannot be concluded that the prices would be likely materially to undercut and/or undersell the Community industry’s prices or costs.
Posledično ni mogoče skleniti, da bodo cene verjetno znatno nelojalno nižale cene ali stroške industrije Skupnosti in/ali bile pod ravnjo cen ali stroškov industrije Skupnosti.
Impact on the Community industry of the projected export volumes and price effects in the event of repeal of measures
Vpliv predvidenega obsega izvoza in cen na industrijo Skupnosti v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov
The urea market is forecast to grow significantly in the coming years both in the Community [9] and worldwide, mainly due to increased agricultural production (for biofuel applications) and also due to expanding industrial use for AdBlue [10].
Po napovedih se bo trg sečnine v naslednjih letih zelo povečal tako v Skupnosti [9] kot tudi po vsem svetu, zlasti zaradi povečane kmetijske pridelave (za biogoriva) in tudi zaradi vse večje industrijske uporabe AdBlueja [10].
As an example, prospects for agricultural markets in the European Union 2007-14 released by the Directorate-General for Agriculture in July 2007 confirm that cereals production will likely increase by up to 20 % in this period.
Na primer, napovedi za kmetijske trge v Evropski uniji 2007 do 2014, ki jih je izdal Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo julija 2007, potrjujejo, da se bo pridelava žit v tem obdobju povečala do 20 %.
The applicant-own evaluation suggests a 10 % growth.
Vložnikova lastna ocena nakazuje 10-odstotno rast.
Moreover, at the end of September 2007, Council Regulation (EC) No 1107/2007 [11] established derogations from set-aside lands for the year 2008.
Konec septembra 2007 je Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1107/2007 [11] določila odstopanja od zemljišč, puščenih v prahu, za leto 2008.
The anticipated Community market growth (around one million additional tonnes) is likely to exceed the maximum likely volumes that the exporting countries could export to the Community.
Predvidena rast trga Skupnosti (okoli milijon dodatnih ton) bo verjetno presegla največji verjetni obseg, ki bi ga države izvoznice lahko izvozile v Skupnost.
Therefore, no major volume imbalances would be likely to emanate from these additional exports, not least because the gap between maximum potential Community production and consumption is quantified at roughly two million tonnes, and there is no indication that this gap would be filled by other exports (inter alia, originating in Russia, as described in Regulation (EC) No 907/2007) to an extent that oversupply would suppress or depress market prices.
Zato ni verjetno, da bi večja neravnovesja obsega izhajala iz tega dodatnega izvoza, saj je vrzel med največjo možno proizvodnjo Skupnosti in potrošnjo ocenjena na okoli dva milijona ton, prav tako pa ni znakov, ki bi kazali na to, da bo to vrzel zapolnil drug izvoz (tj. s poreklom iz Rusije, kot je navedeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 907/2007) do tolikšne mere, da bi prevelika ponudba preprečila ali znižala tržne cene.
In view of the foregoing, it is not likely that the Community industry would have to decrease its sales, production or prices to an extent such that its profitability and overall position would be materially affected.
V luči zgoraj navedenega ni verjetno, da bi morala industrija Skupnosti zmanjšati svojo prodajo, proizvodnjo ali cene do te mere, da bi to znatno vplivalo na njeno dobičkonosnost in splošno stanje.
Therefore, it is likely that profits would maintain their current level, reflecting the favourable market conditions prevailing in particular from 2004 to the RIP.
Zato je verjetno, da bodo dobički ostali na sedanjih stopnjah, kar odraža ugodne razmere na trgu zlasti od leta 2004 do OPP.
Given the foregoing, it cannot be concluded that there is a likelihood of recurrence of injury to the Community industry were the existing measures to be repealed.
V luči zgoraj navedenega ni mogoče skleniti, da obstaja v primeru razveljavitve obstoječih ukrepov verjetnost ponovitve škode za industrijo Skupnosti.
They were also granted a period to make representations subsequent to this disclosure.
Po tem obvestilu jim je bil dan tudi rok za predložitev svojih stališč.
No comments were received that were apt to alter the conclusions set out above.
Prispela ni nobena pripomba, namenjena spremembi zgornjih sklepnih ugotovitev.
It follows from the above that, as provided for by Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of urea originating in Belarus, Croatia, Libya and Ukraine should be repealed and the proceeding terminated.
Iz zgoraj navedenega sledi, kot je navedeno v členu 11(2) osnovne uredbe, da je treba razveljaviti protidampinške ukrepe, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz sečnine s poreklom iz Belorusije, Hrvaške, Libije in Ukrajine, in zaključiti postopek.
In consideration of the circumstances described above, namely the significant distortions in the cost structure and/or the export operations by exporters in all four countries concerned, it is found necessary to monitor closely the evolution of the imports of urea originating in Belarus, Croatia, Libya and Ukraine, with a view to facilitating swift appropriate action should the situation so require,
Glede na zgoraj opisane okoliščine, tj. glede na znatno izkrivljanje stroškovne strukture in/ali izvoznih poslov s strani izvoznikov v vseh štirih zadevnih državah, se zdi potrebno pazljivo spremljanje ocene uvoza sečnine s poreklom iz Belorusije, Hrvaške, Libije in Ukrajine, da bi bilo morebitno hitro ustrezno ukrepanje enostavnejše –
The anti-dumping duty on imports of urea, whether or not in aqueous solution, falling within CN codes 31021010 and 31021090 and originating in Belarus, Croatia, Libya and Ukraine is hereby repealed and the proceeding concerning these imports is terminated.
Protidampinška dajatev na uvoz sečnine, v vodni raztopini ali ne, uvrščene pod oznaki KN 31021010 in 31021090, s poreklom iz Belorusije, Hrvaške, Libije in Ukrajine, se razveljavi, postopek v zvezi s tem uvozom pa se zaključi.
OJ C 93, 21.4.2006, p. 6.
UL C 93, 21.4.2006, str. 6.
OJ C 316, 22.12.2006, p. 13.
UL C 316, 22.12.2006, str. 13.
OJ L 198, 31.7.2007, p. 4.
UL L 198, 31.7.2007, str. 4.
Case T-210/95 EFMA v Council (1195) ECR II-3291, point 60.
Zadeva T-210/95 EFMA proti Svetu [1195] Recueil, II-3291, odstavek 60.
Source: ‘Global fertilisers and raw materials supply and supply/demand balances: 2005-2009’, A05/71b, June 2005, International Fertiliser Industry Association ‘IFA’.
Vir: „Global fertilisers and raw materials supply and supply/demand balances: 2005-2009“, A05/71b, junij 2005, International Fertiliser Industry Association „IFA“.
AdBlue is a registered trade mark for an Aqueous Urea Solution (32,5 %) and is used in a process called Selective Catalytic Reduction to reduce emissions of oxides of nitrogen from the exhaust of diesel vehicles.
AdBlue je registrirana blagovna znamka za vodno raztopino sečnine (32,5 %), uporablja pa se v postopku, imenovanem selektivna katalitična redukcija, za zmanjševanje emisij NOx iz izpušnih plinov dizelskih vozil.
OJ L 253, 28.9.2007, p. 1.
UL L 253, 28.9.2007, str. 1.
Joint Stock Company Concern Stirol, Gorlovka,
delniška družba Concern Stirol, Gorlovka,
Council Regulation (EC) No 241/2008
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 241/2008
on the conclusion of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau
o sklenitvi sporazuma o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko skupnostjo in Republiko Gvinejo Bissau
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 37 in conjunction with Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 37 v povezavi s prvim pododstavkom člena 300(2) in (3),
The Community has negotiated with the Republic of Guinea-Bissau a new Fisheries Partnership Agreement providing Community vessels with fishing opportunities in the waters over which Guinea-Bissau has sovereignty or jurisdiction in respect of fisheries.
Skupnost je s pogajanji z Republiko Gvinejo Bissau dosegla Sporazum o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju, ki plovilom Skupnosti zagotavlja ribolovne možnosti v vodah, ki so glede ribištva pod suverenostjo ali jurisdikcijo Gvineje Bissau.
As a result of those negotiations, a Fisheries Partnership Agreement was initialled on 23 May 2007.
Kot rezultat navedenih pogajanj je bil 23. maja 2007 parafiran sporazum o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju.
It is in the Community’s interest to approve that Agreement.
V interesu Skupnosti je, da odobri ta sporazum.
The Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau [2] is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.The text of the Agreement is attached to this Regulation.
Sporazum o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko skupnostjo in Republiko Gvinejo Bissau [2] se odobri v imenu Skupnosti.Besedilo Sporazuma je priloženo tej uredbi.
The fishing opportunities set out in the Protocol to the Agreement shall be allocated among the Member States as follows:
Ribolovne možnosti, določene s Protokolom k Sporazumu, se razporedijo med države članice na naslednji način:
shrimp fishing:
ribolov kozic:
fin-fish/cephalopods:
ribolov rib kostnic/glavonožcev:
tuna seiners and surface longliners:
plovila za ribolov tunov s potegalko in plovila s površinskim parangalom:
9 vessels
9 plovil
pole-and-line vessels:
plovila za ribolov z ribiško palico:
If licence applications from the Member States referred to in paragraph 1 do not cover all the fishing opportunities fixed by the Protocol to the Agreement, the Commission may take into consideration licence applications from any other Member State.
Če zahtevki za dovoljenja držav članic iz odstavka 1 ne izčrpajo vseh ribolovnih možnosti, ki jih določa Protokol k Sporazumu, lahko Komisija upošteva zahtevke za dovoljenja katere koli druge države članice.
The Member States whose vessels fish under the Agreement referred to in Article 1 shall notify the Commission of the quantities of each stock caught within the Guinea-Bissau fishing zone in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 500/2001 of 14 March 2001 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 on the monitoring of catches taken by Community fishing vessels in third country waters and on the high seas [3].Article 4
Države članice, katerih plovila ribarijo na podlagi sporazuma iz člena 1, Komisijo uradno obvestijo o količinah posameznega staleža, ujetega v ribolovni coni Gvineje Bissau v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 500/2001 z dne 14. marca 2001 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2847/93 o nadzoru ulova z ribiškimi plovili Skupnosti v vodah tretjih držav in mednarodnih vodah [3].Člen 4
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the persons empowered to sign the Agreement in order to bind the Community.
Predsednik Sveta je pooblaščen, da imenuje osebo(-e), pooblaščeno(-e) za podpis Sporazuma, ki je za Skupnost zavezujoč.
Council Regulation (EC) No 242/2008
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 242/2008
on the conclusion of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire
o sklenitvi Sporazuma o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko skupnostjo na eni strani in Republiko Slonokoščeno obalo na drugi strani
The Community has negotiated with Côte d’Ivoire a Fisheries Partnership Agreement providing Community vessels with fishing opportunities in the waters over which Côte d’Ivoire has sovereignty or jurisdiction in respect of fisheries.
Skupnost je s pogajanji s Slonokoščeno obalo dosegla Sporazum o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju, ki plovilom Skupnosti zagotavlja ribolovne možnosti v vodah, ki so glede ribištva pod suverenostjo ali jurisdikcijo Slonokoščene obale.
As a result of those negotiations, a new Fisheries Partnership Agreement was initialled on 5 April 2007.
Kot rezultat navedenih pogajanj je bil 5. aprila 2007 parafiran nov sporazum o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju.
It is in the Community’s interest to approve that Agreement.
V interesu Skupnosti je, da navedeni sporazum odobri.
The Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire [2] is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.Article 2
Sporazum o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko skupnostjo na eni strani in Republiko Slonokoščeno obalo [2] na drugi strani se odobri v imenu Skupnosti.Člen 2
25 purse seiners:
25 plovil z zaporno plavarico:
France 10 vessels
Francija 10 plovil
Spain 15 vessels
Španija 15 plovil
15 surface longliners:
15 plovil s površinskim parangalom:
Spain 10 vessels
Španija 10 plovil
Portugal 5 vessels.
Portugalska 5 plovil
If licence applications from these Member States do not cover all the fishing opportunities laid down by the Protocol, the Commission may take into consideration licence applications from any other Member State.
Če zahtevki za dovoljenja iz teh držav članic ne pokrijejo vseh ribolovnih možnosti, določenih s Protokolom, lahko Komisija upošteva zahtevke za dovoljenja iz katere koli druge države članice.
The Member States whose vessels fish under the Agreement referred to in Article 1 shall notify the Commission of the quantities of each stock caught within Côte d’Ivoire’s fishing zone in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 500/2001 of 14 March 2001 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 on the monitoring of catches taken by Community fishing vessels in third country waters and on the high seas [3].Article 4
Države članice, katerih plovila lovijo v skladu s Sporazumom iz člena 1, Komisijo uradno obvestijo o količinah posameznega staleža, ujetega v ribolovni coni Slonokoščene obale, v skladu s podrobnimi pravili, določenimi v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 500/2001 z dne 14. marca 2001 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2847/93 o nadzoru ulova z ribiškimi plovili Skupnosti v vodah tretjih držav in mednarodnih vodah [3].Člen 4
OJ L 48, 22.2.2008, p. 41.
UL L 48, 22.2.2008, str. 41.
Council Regulation (EC) No 243/2008
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 243/2008
imposing certain restrictive measures on the illegal authorities of the island of Anjouan in the Union of the Comoros
o nekaterih omejevalnih ukrepih za nezakonite oblasti otoka Anjouan v Islamski zvezni republiki Komori
Having regard to Common Position 2008/187/CFSP of 3 March 2008 concerning restrictive measures against the illegal authorities of the island of Anjouan in the Union of the Comoros [1],
ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta 2008/187/SZVP z dne 3. marca 2008 o omejevalnih ukrepih za nezakonite oblasti otoka Anjouan v Islamski zvezni republiki Komori [1],
On 25 October 2007, by letter addressed to the Secretary General/High Representative, the President of the African Union Commission asked for the support of the European Union and its Member States in the enforcement of the sanctions that the Peace and Security Council of the African Union had decided to impose on the illegal authorities of Anjouan and certain associated persons.
Z dopisom z dne 25. oktobra 2007, naslovljenim na Generalnega sekretarja/visokega predstavnika, je predsednik Komisije Afriške unije Evropsko unijo in njene države članice zaprosil za pomoč pri izvajanju sankcij, ki jih je Mirovni in varnostni svet Afriške unije uvedel za nezakonite oblasti otoka Anjouan in nekatere z njimi povezane osebe.
Common Position 2008/187/CFSP provides for restrictive measures to be imposed on the illegal authorities of Anjouan and certain associated persons.
V skupnem stališču 2008/187/SZVP so predvideni omejevalni ukrepi za nezakonite oblasti otoka Anjouan in nekatere z njimi povezane osebe.
Those measures include freezing funds and economic resources belonging to the persons concerned.
Ti ukrepi zajemajo predvsem zamrznitev sredstev in gospodarskih virov, ki pripadajo zadevnim osebam.
The said measures fall within the scope of the Treaty establishing the European Community.
Navedeni ukrepi spadajo na področje uporabe Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti.
Accordingly, with a view to ensuring their uniform application by economic operators in all Member States, a Community act is necessary to implement them as far as the Community is concerned,
Treba je zagotoviti, da bodo ta ukrep gospodarski subjekti v vseh državah članicah uporabljali enotno, zato je za njegovo izvajanje v okviru Skupnosti potrebna zakonodaja Skupnosti –
‘funds’ means financial assets and economic benefits of every kind, including but not limited to:
„sredstva“ pomenijo vse vrste finančnih sredstev in koristi, kar vključuje, vendar ni omejeno na:
publicly- and privately-traded securities and debt instruments, including stocks and shares, certificates representing securities, bonds, notes, warrants, debentures and derivatives contracts;
javne in zasebne vrednostne papirje in dolžniške instrumente, vključno z delnicami in deleži, certifikati za vrednostne papirje, obveznicami, lastnimi menicami, garancijami, zadolžnicami in pogodbami na izvedene finančne instrumente;