natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The extent to which import licences may be issued should therefore be determined by establishing the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities requested under the quota[s] in question.
Zato je treba z določitvijo koeficienta dodelitve, ki se bo uporabil za zahtevane količine za zadevne kvote, določiti, v kakšnem obsegu se lahko izdajo uvozna dovoljenja.
It is also clear from the notifications that, for the quotas with serial numbers 09.4127, 09.412, 09.4129 and 09.4112, the applications lodged in the first 10 working days of September 2007 under Article 4(1) of the Regulation (EC) No 327/98, cover a quantity less than or equal to that available.
Poleg tega iz zgoraj navedenega obvestila izhaja, da zahtevki za kvote z zaporednimi številkami 09.4127, 09.4128, 09.4129, in 09.4112, predloženi v prvih desetih delovnih dneh meseca septembra 2007 v skladu s členom 4(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 327/98, zajemajo količino, ki je manjša od razpoložljive količine.
The quantities not used for the September subperiod of the quotas with serial numbers 09.4127, 09.4128 and 09.4129 are transferred to the quota with serial number 09.4138 for the following subperiod under Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 327/98.
Neporabljene količine kvot z zaporednimi številkami 09.4127, 09.4128 in 09.4129 za podobdobje september se prenesejo v kvoto z zaporedno številko 09.4138 za naslednje kvotno podobdobje v skladu s členom 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 327/98.
The total quantities available for the following subperiod should therefore be fixed for the quotas with serial numbers 09.4138 and 09.4168, in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 327/98,
Za kvoti z zaporednima številkama 09.4138 in 09.4168 je treba določiti skupne razpoložljive količine za naslednje kvotno podobdobje v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 327/98 –
For import licence applications for rice under the quotas with serial numbers 09.4130, 09.4117, 09.4118, 09.4119 and 09.4168 as referred to in Regulation (EC) No 327/98 lodged in the first 10 working days of September 2007, licences shall be issued for the quantities requested, multiplied by the allocation coefficients set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Na podlagi zahtevkov za uvozna dovoljenja za riž v okviru kvot z zaporednimi številkami 09.4130, 09.4117, 09.4118, 09.4119 in 09.4168 iz Uredbe (ES) št. 327/98, predloženih v prvih desetih delovnih dneh meseca septembra 2007, se izdajo dovoljenja za zahtevane količine, za katere se uporabijo koeficienti dodelitve iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
The total quantities available under the quotas with serial numbers 09.4138 and 09.4168 as referred to in Regulation (EC) No 327/98 for the following subperiod are set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Skupne razpoložljive količine v okviru kvot z zaporednima številkama 09.4138 in 09.4168 iz Uredbe (ES) št. 327/98 za naslednje kvotno podobdobje so določene v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
Quantities to be allocated for the September 2007 subperiod and quantities available for the following subperiod under Regulation (EC) No 327/98:
Količine, ki se dodelijo za podobdobje september 2007, in razpoložljive količine za naslednje podobdobje v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 327/98:
Quota for wholly milled or semi-milled rice falling within CN code 100630 provided for in Article 1(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 327/98:
Kvota za brušeni riž ali manj brušeni riž, ki se uvršča pod oznako KN 100630, določena v členu 1(1)(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 327/98:
Total quantities available for September 2007 subperiod
Skupne razpoložljive količine za podobdobje oktober 2007
Quota for wholly milled or semi-milled rice falling within CN code 10063040 provided for in Article 1(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 327/98:
Kvota za brušeni riž ali manj brušeni riž, ki se uvršča pod oznako KN 10063040, določena v členu 1(1)(d) Uredbe (ES) št. 327/98:
Quota for broken rice falling within CN code 100640 provided for in Article 1(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 327/98:
Kvota za lomljeni riž, ki se uvršča pod oznako KN 100640, določena v členu 1(1)(e) Uredbe (ES) št. 327/98:
Council Regulation (EC) No 1124/2007
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1124/2007
amending Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 367/2006 o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve na uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (basic Regulation) and in particular Article 19 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2026/97 z dne 6. oktobra 1997 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 19 Uredbe,
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 [2], imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film falling within CN codes ex39206219 and ex39206290, originating in India (the product concerned).
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 2597/1999 [2] uvedel dokončno izravnalno dajatev na uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata („PET“), ki se uvršča pod oznaki KN ex39206219 in ex39206290, s poreklom iz Indije („zadevni izdelek“).
The investigation which led to the adoption of that Regulation is hereinafter referred to as the ‘original investigation’.
Preiskava, ki je omogočila sprejetje navedene uredbe, je v nadaljnjem besedilu imenovana „prvotna preiskava“.
The countervailing duty imposed on imports of PET film manufactured and exported by Jindal Poly Films Limited, formerly known as Jindal Polyester Ltd [3], (Jindal or the company) was 7 %.
Izravnalna dajatev, uvedena na uvoz folije iz PET, ki jo je proizvajala in izvažala Jindal Poly Films Limited, prej poznana kot Jindal Polyester Ltd [3], („Jindal“ ali „družba“), je bila 7 %.
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 [4], following an expiry review pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation, maintained the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 on imports of PET film originating in India.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 367/2006 [4] po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe ohranil dokončno izravnalno dajatev, uvedeno z Uredbo (ES) št. 2597/1999 na uvoz folije iz PET s poreklom iz Indije.
The review investigation period was 1 October 2003 to 30 September 2004.
Preiskava v zvezi s pregledom je trajala od 1. oktobra 2003 do 30. septembra 2004.
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1288/2006, following an interim review concerning the subsidisation of another Indian PET film producer, Garware Polyester Limited (Garware), amended the definitive countervailing duty imposed on Garware by Regulation (EC) No 367/2006.
Svet je po vmesnem pregledu glede subvencioniranja drugega indijskega proizvajalca filma iz PET družbe Garware Polyester Limited („Garware“) z Uredbo (ES) št. 1288/2006 spremenil dokončno izravnalno dajatev, uvedeno za Garware z Uredbo (ES) št. 367/2006.
Ex officio initiation of a partial interim review
Začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda po uradni dolžnosti
Prima facie evidence was available to the Commission indicating that Jindal benefited from increased levels of subsidisation, compared to the original investigation, and that the changes to such levels were of a lasting nature.
Komisija je imela prima facie dokaz, ki je nakazoval, da se je Jindal v primerjavi s prvotno preiskavo okoriščal z višjimi ravni subvencioniranja ter da so bile spremembe na takšno raven trajne.
As a result, the Commission decided, after consulting the Advisory Committee, to initiate ex officio a partial interim review in accordance with Article 19 of the basic Regulation, limited to the level of subsidisation to Jindal, in order to assess the need for the continuation, removal or amendment of the existing countervailing measures.
Komisija se je zato po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom odločila, da začne delni vmesni pregled po uradni dolžnosti v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe, omejen na raven subvencioniranja Jindal, da se oceni potreba po nadaljevanju, odpravi ali spremembi obstoječih izravnalnih ukrepov.
On 2 August 2006 the Commission announced, by a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [5], the initiation of this review.
Komisija je 2. avgusta 2006 z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [5], napovedala začetek tega pregleda.
The review investigation period (review IP) ran from 1 April 2005 to 31 March 2006.
Obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („OP v zvezi s pregledom“) je potekalo od 1. aprila 2005 do 31. marca 2006.
The Commission officially advised Jindal, the Government of India (GOI) and Du Pont Tejin Films, Luxembourg, Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Germany, Toray Plastics Europe, France and Nuroll, Italy, which represent the overwhelming majority of Community PET film production (hereinafter the Community industry), of the initiation of the partial interim review.
Komisija je uradno obvestila Jindal, indijsko vlado („IV“) ter Du Pont Tejin Films, Luksemburg, Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Nemčija, Toray Plastics Europe, Francija in Nuroll, Italija, ki predstavljajo veliko večino proizvodnje folije iz PET Skupnosti (v nadaljnjem besedilu „industrija Skupnosti“), o začetku delnega vmesnega pregleda.
In order to obtain the information necessary for its investigation, the Commission sent a questionnaire to Jindal, which cooperated by replying to the questionnaire.
Za pridobitev informacij, ki so potrebne za njeno preiskavo, je Komisija družbi Jindal poslala vprašalnik, ki ga je družba tudi izpolnila.
A verification visit was carried out at Jindal’s premises in India.
V prostorih družbe Jindal v Indiji je bil izveden preveritveni obisk.
Jindal, the GOI and the Community industry were informed of the essential results of the investigation and had the opportunity to comment.
Družba Jindal, indijska vlada in industrija Skupnosti so bile seznanjene z bistvenimi rezultati preiskave ter so imele možnost predložiti svoje pripombe.
Comments were received by Jindal and are discussed below.
Družba Jindal je predložila pripombe, ki so obravnavane v nadaljevanju.
The GOI did not submit any comments.
Indijska vlada ni predložila pripomb.
The product concerned is polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film, originating in India, normally declared under CN codes ex39206219 and ex39206290, as defined in the original investigation.
Zadevni izdelek je, kot je določeno v prvotni preiskavi, folija iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije, ki je navadno prijavljen pod oznakama KN ex39206219 in ex39206290.
On the basis of the information available and the reply to the Commission’s questionnaire, the following schemes, allegedly involving the granting of subsidies, were investigated:
Na podlagi dosegljivih informacij odgovorov na vprašalnik Komisije so bile preiskane naslednje sheme, ki domnevno vključujejo dodeljevanje subvencij:
Nationwide schemes
Državne sheme:
Advance Licence Scheme;
shema vnaprej pridobljenih dovoljenj (Advance Licence Scheme – ALS);
Duty Entitlement Passbook Scheme;
shema za preložitev plačila uvoznih dajatev (Duty Entitlement Passbook Scheme – DEPS);
Export Oriented Units Scheme/Special Economic Zones Scheme;
shema izvozno usmerjenih enot (Export Oriented Units Scheme – EOUS)/Shema posebnih ekonomskih con (Special Economic Zones Scheme – SEZS);
Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme;
shema za podporo izvozu investicijskega blaga (Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme – EPCGS);
Export Income Tax Exemption Scheme;
shema oprostitve davka na dohodek od izvoza (Export Income Tax Exemption Scheme – EITES);
Export Credit Scheme;
shema izvoznih kreditov (Export Credit Scheme – ECS);
Duty-Free Replenishment Certificate.
potrdilo o oprostitvi davkov pri uvozu glede na izvedene izvoze (Duty Free Replenishment Certificate – DFRC).
A multi-annual plan relating to the Indian foreign trade policy for the period 1 September 2004 to 31 March 2009, which succeeded the former export and import (EXIM) policy, was published by the GOI (FTP 2004 to 2009).
Indijska vlada je objavila večletni načrt v zvezi z indijsko zunanjetrgovinsko politiko za obdobje od 1. septembra 2004 do 31. marca 2009 („FTP 2004–09“), ki je nasledila nekdanjo izvozno in uvozno politiko (EXIM).
In addition, a handbook of procedures governing the FTP 2004 to 2009 (HOP I 2004 to 2009) was published by the GOI and is updated on a regular basis [6].
Poleg tega je objavila tudi priročnik o postopkih, ki urejajo politiko FTP 2004–09 („HOP I 2004–2009“), in ga redno posodablja [6].
The Export Income Tax Exemption Scheme specified in (v) above is based on the Income Tax Act 1961, which is amended annually by the Finance Act.
Shema oprostitve davka na dohodek od izvoza iz točke (v) zgoraj temelji na Zakonu o davku na dohodek iz leta 1961, ki se ga vsako leto spremeni z Zakonom o financah.
The Export Credit Scheme specified in (vi) above is based on Sections 21 and 35A of the Banking Regulation Act 1949, which allows the Reserve Bank of India to instruct commercial banks regarding export credits.
Shema izvoznih kreditov iz točke (vi) zgoraj temelji na oddelkih 21 in 35A Zakona o bančništvu iz leta 1949, ki indijski centralni banki (Reserve Bank of India – RBI) omogoča usmerjanje komercialnih bank na področju izvoznih kreditov.
On the basis of the information available and the reply to the Commission’s questionnaire, the Commission also investigated the Package Scheme of Incentives (hereinafter, the ‘PSI’) of the Government of Maharashtra (the GOM) 1993.
Na podlagi dosegljivih informacij in odgovorov na njen vprašalnik je Komisija prav tako preiskala paketno shemo spodbud (package scheme of incentives – PSI) vlade Maharaštre leta 1993.
Nationwide Schemes
Državne sheme
Advance Licence Scheme (ALS)
Shema vnaprej pridobljenih dovoljenj (Advance Licence Scheme – „ALS“)
The detailed description of the scheme is contained in paragraphs 4.1.3 to 4.1.14 of the FTP 2004 to 2009 and Chapters 4.1 to 4.30 of the HOP I 2004 to 2009.
Podroben opis sheme je opredeljen v odstavkih 4.1.3 do 4.1.14 FTP 2004–2009 in poglavjih 4.1 do 4.30 HOP I 2004–2009.
The scheme was replaced in April 2006, i.e. after the end of the review IP, by the ‘Advance Authorisation Scheme’. However, this appears to be essentially a name change.
Shemo je aprila 2006, tj. po koncu OP v zvezi s pregledom, nadomestila „shema vnaprej pridobljenih pooblastil“; vendar se zdi, da gre v glavnem le za spremembo imena.
The following analysis focuses on the ALS in place during the review IP.
Nadaljnja analiza se osredotoča na ALS, ki je veljala med OP v zvezi s pregledom.
The ALS consists of six sub-schemes.
ALS sestavlja šest podshem.
Those sub-schemes differ, inter alia, in the criteria for eligibility.
Navedene podsheme se med drugim razlikujejo v merilih za upravičenost.
Manufacturer-exporters and merchant-exporters ‘tied to’ supporting manufacturers are eligible for the ALS for physical exports and for the ALS for annual requirement.
Proizvajalci izvozniki ali trgovci izvozniki, ki so „povezani“ s spremljajočimi proizvajalci, so upravičeni do ALS za fizični izvoz in do ALS za letne potrebe.
Main contractors which supply to the ‘deemed export’ categories mentioned in paragraph 8.2 of the FTP 2004 to 2009, such as suppliers of an export oriented unit (EOU), are eligible for ALS deemed export.
Glavni izvajalci, ki oskrbujejo kategorije „predvidenega izvoza“, navedene v odstavku 8.2 FTP 2004–2009, kot so dobavitelji izvozno usmerjenih obratov („EOU“), so upravičeni do predvidenega izvoza ALS.
Manufacturer-exporters supplying the ultimate exporter are eligible for ALS for intermediate supplies.
Proizvajalci izvozniki, ki dobavljajo končnemu izvozniku, so upravičeni do ALS za vmesne dobave.
Finally, intermediate suppliers to manufacturer-exporters are eligible for ‘deemed export’ benefits under the sub-schemes Advance Release Order (ARO) and back-to-back inland letter of credit.
Končno pa so vmesni dobavitelji proizvajalcem izvoznikom upravičeni do „predvidenega izvoza“ v okviru podshem za vnaprejšnjo pripustitev naročil („ARO“) in vzajemnega notranjega akreditiva.
Since only the first four of the six sub-schemes were used by Jindal during the review IP, only those will be described in more detail below.
Glede na to, da je Jindal med OP v zvezi s pregledom uporabljal le prve štiri od šestih podshem, bodo v nadaljnjem besedilu natančneje opisane le te sheme.
An Advance Licence can be issued for:
Vnaprej pridobljeno dovoljenje se lahko izda za:
It allows the duty-free import of input materials for the production of a specific resultant export product.
Omogoča dajatev prost uvoz surovin za proizvodnjo posebnega nastalega izvoznega izdelka.
An import allowance and an export obligation, including the type of export product, are specified in the licence.
Uvozno nadomestilo in izvozna obveznost vključno z vrsto izvoznega izdelka sta navedena v dovoljenju.
Annual requirement: Such a licence is not linked to a specific export product, but to a wider product group (e.g. chemical and related products).
Letne potrebe: Takšno dovoljenje ni vezano na določen izvozni izdelek, ampak na širšo skupino (npr. kemični in sorodni izdelki).
The licence holder can — up to a certain value threshold set by its past export performance — import duty free any input to be used in manufacturing any of the items falling under such a product group.
Imetnik dovoljenja lahko – do določenega mejnega zneska, ki je določen glede na pretekle rezultate – brez dajatev uvaža vse surovine, ki se uporabljajo pri proizvodnji vseh izdelkov, ki spadajo v takšno skupino izdelkov.
Deemed exports: This sub-scheme allows a main contractor the duty-free import of inputs required in manufacturing goods to be sold as ‘deemed exports’ to the categories of customers mentioned in paragraph 8.2(b) to (f), (g), (i) and (j) of the FTP 2004 to 2009.
Predvideni izvoz: Ta podshema omogoča glavnemu izvajalcu brez dajatev uvažati surovine, potrebne za proizvodnjo blaga, ki se kot „predviden izvoz“ prodajo kategorijam kupcev, ki so omenjeni v odstavkih 8.2.(b) do (f), (g), (i) in (j) FTP politike 2004–2009.
A number of categories of supply are regarded as deemed exports provided the goods are manufactured in India, e.g. supply of goods to an EOU or to a company situated in a special economic zone (SEZ).
Številne kategorije dobav se štejejo za predviden izvoz, če je blago izdelano v Indiji, npr. dobava blaga izvozno usmerjeni enoti („EOU“) ali podjetju, ki se nahaja v posebni ekonomski coni („SEZ“).
Intermediate supplies: This sub-scheme covers cases where two manufacturers intend to produce a single export product and divide the production process.
Vmesne dobave: Ta podshema pokriva primere, kjer nameravata dva proizvajalca izdelovati en izvozni izdelek in si razdeliti proizvodni postopek.
It can import duty free input materials and can obtain for this purpose an ALS for intermediate supplies.
Brez dajatev lahko uvaža surovinske materiale in za ta namen prejme vnaprej pridobljeno dovoljenje za vmesne dobave.
As stated above, Jindal used the ALS during the review IP.
Kakor je navedeno zgoraj je družba Jindal med OP v zvezi s pregledom uporabljala ALS.
More precisely, it made use of the four sub-schemes indicated under (i) to (iv) above.
Natančneje, uporabila je štiri podsheme, navedene pod točkami (i) do (iv) zgoraj.
For verification purposes by the Indian authorities, a licence holder is legally obliged to maintain ‘a true and proper account of licence-wise consumption and utilisation of imported goods’ in a specified format (Chapter 4.30 HOP I 2004 to 2009) (hereinafter the consumption register).
Za namene preverjanja s strani indijskih organov je imetnik dovoljenja zakonsko zavezan voditi „verodostojno in ustrezno poslovno knjigo potrošnje in porabe uvoženega blaga v zvezi z dovoljenjem“ v določeni obliki (poglavje 4.30 HOP I 2004–2009) (v nadaljnjem besedilu „evidenca porabe“).
The verification showed that the company did not properly maintain its consumption register, i.e. that it did not record the link between input material and the final destination of the resultant product, as required by the format required by the GOI, despite the fact that it not only exports the resultant product but sells it on the domestic market as well.
V okviru preverjanja je bilo ugotovljeno, da družba ni pravilno vodila takšne evidence porabe, kar pomeni, da ni dokumentirala povezave med surovinami in namembnim krajem nastalega izdelka, kakor to zahteva indijska vlada, navkljub dejstvu, da nastale izdelke ne le izvaža, ampak jih tudi prodaja na domačem trgu.
With regard to sub-schemes (i) and (iii) above, both the import allowance and the export obligation (including deemed export) are fixed in volume and value by the GOI and are documented on the licence.
V zvezi z zgoraj navedeno podshemo (i) in (iii) indijska vlada določi količino in vrednost nadomestila za uvoz in obveznosti izvoza (vključno s predvidenim izvozom), kar je zapisano v dovoljenju.
The volume of imports allowed under this scheme is determined by the GOI on the basis of standard input-output norms (SIONs).
Količino uvoza, dovoljenega iz te sheme, indijska vlada določi na osnovi standardnih input-output normativov („standard input-output norms – SION“).
SIONs exist for most products including the product concerned and are published in Volume II of the HOP I 2004 to 2009.
SION obstajajo za večino izdelkov, vključno z zadevnim izdelkom, in so objavljeni v poglavju II HOP I 2004–2009.
The SIONs for PET film and PET chips, an intermediate product, were revised downwards in October 2005.
SION za folije iz PET in PET v obliki zrnc, ki je vmesni izdelek, so bili popravljeni navzdol oktobra 2005.
With regard to sub-scheme (iii) it was noted that the deemed exports fulfilling the respective obligation under the ALS were essentially intra-company sales, i.e. a PET chip manufacturing unit of Jindal (which is not a separate legal entity) sold the PET chips for further downstream production of PET film to Jindal’s EOU.
V zvezi s podshemo (iii) je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bil predviden izvoz, ki bi izpolnil obveznosti v okviru ALS, v glavnem prodaja znotraj skupine, kar pomeni, da je proizvodna enota družbe Jindal za PET v obliki zrnc (ki ni ločena pravna oseba) prodala PET v obliki zrnc za nadaljnji proizvodni proces folij iz PET izvozno usmerjeni enoti družbe Jindal.
The import of raw materials took place in the context of the manufacture of the intermediate product (PET chips).
Uvoz surovin se je bil opravljen v okviru proizvodnje vmesnega izdelka (PET v obliki zrnc).
In other words, under sub-scheme (iii) domestic sales are considered to be exports.
Z drugimi besedami se domača prodaja v okviru podsheme (iii) šteje za izvoz.
With regard to sub-scheme (iv) input materials domestically procured by Jindal are written off from Jindal’s Advance Licence and an intermediate Advance Licence is issued to the domestic supplier.
V zvezi s podshemo (iv) so surovine, ki jih je družba Jindal nabavila doma, odpisane z vnaprej pridobljenega dovoljenja družbe Jindal, domačemu dobavitelju pa je izdano vmesno vnaprej pridobljeno dovoljenje.
The holder of such intermediate Advance Licence can import, duty-free, the goods needed to produce the product that will subsequently be supplied to Jindal as raw material for the production of the product concerned.
Imetnik takšnega vmesnega vnaprej pridobljenega dovoljenja lahko brez dajatev uvaža blago, potrebno za proizvodnjo izdelka, ki bo naknadno dobavljeno družbi Jindal kot surovina za proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka.
In the case of sub-scheme (ii) listed above (Advance Licence for annual requirement), only the import allowance in value is documented on the licence.
V primeru podsheme (ii), navedene zgoraj, (vnaprej pridobljeno dovoljenje za letne potrebe), se na dovoljenje vpiše samo vrednost uvoznega nadomestila.
The licence holder is obliged to ‘maintain the nexus between imported inputs and the resultant product’ (paragraph 4.24A(c) HOP I 2004 to 2009).
Imetnik dovoljenja mora „vzdrževati povezavo med uvoženimi surovinami in nastalim izdelkom“ (odstavek 4.24A(c) HOP I 2004–2009).