natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Thanks to the aid, FSO can survive and will compete for such production opportunities at the expense of other production plants located in the area.
Po zaslugi pomoči lahko družba FSO preživi in se bo potegovala za takšne proizvodne priložnosti na račun drugih proizvodnih obratov, ki se nahajajo na tem območju.
This kind of distortion may have already taken place when FSO was awarded the […] licence agreement by GM DAT.
Do te vrste izkrivljanja konkurence je morda že prišlo, ko je družba GM DAT sklenila […] licenčno pogodbo z družbo FSO.
The […] model could theoretically have been produced in another European plant.
Model […] bi se lahko teoretično proizvajal v drugem evropskem obratu.
As FSO will compete for other licence agreements in the future, the Commission can reasonably assume, leaving aside this particular contract, that the kind of distortion just described will take place in the future, at the expense of other plants located in the EU.
Ker se bo FSO potegovala za druge licenčne pogodbe v prihodnosti, lahko Komisija upravičeno domneva, če zanemarimo to pogodbo, da bo do te vrste izkrivljanja konkurence prihajalo v prihodnosti na škodo drugih obratov, ki se nahajajo v EU.
In this respect, the Commission observes that several plants in the EU currently produce the type of car that FSO plans to produce.
V tej zvezi Komisija ugotavlja, da več obratov v EU sedaj proizvaja tip vozila, katerega proizvodnjo načrtuje FSO.
Such distortion can seriously harm the production plant which would have got the licence agreement concerned if FSO had left the market.
Takšno izkrivljanje lahko resno škoduje proizvodnemu obratu, ki bi zadevno licenčno pogodbo sklenil, če bi družba FSO zapustila trg.
The production of a car model often involves employing hundreds (or even thousands) of persons over several years.
Proizvodnja določenega modela vozila pogosto zahteva zaposlitev stotine (ali celo tisoče) oseb v obdobju več let.
The welfare of the Member State where the unsuccessful bidder is located is thereby seriously affected by the presence of FSO on the market.
Zato prisotnost družbe FSO na trgu resno vpliva na blaginjo države članice, v kateri se nahaja neuspešni ponudnik.
Secondly, the model produced by FSO will be in competition with other models and take part of their market share from them.
Drugič, model, ki ga proizvaja FSO, bo tekmoval z drugimi modeli in jim bo odvzel del njihovega tržnega deleža.
Sales of the competing models will be lower than they would in the absence of FSO.
Prodaja konkurenčnih modelov bo manjša, kot bi bila, če družba FSO ne bi bila prisotna.
This kind of distortion will negatively affect the car manufacturers and their production plants producing the competing models.
Ta vrsta izkrivljanja bo negativno vplivala na proizvajalce avtomobilov in njihove proizvodne obrate, ki proizvajajo konkurenčne modele.
If FSO had exited the market, production of the models that FSO is going to build would most probably have been awarded to another production plant.
Če bi FSO izstopila iz trga, bi bila proizvodnja modelov, ki jih namerava izdelovati FSO, najverjetneje dodeljena drugemu proizvodnemu obratu.
However, the Commission observes that the fact that FSO was awarded the contract means its production is cheaper.
Vendar Komisija ugotavlja, da dejstvo, da je družba FSO pogodbo dobila, pomeni, da je njena proizvodnja cenejša.
Therefore, cheaper cars will be offered on the market than would be the case if FSO left the market [20].
Zato bodo avtomobili, ki bodo ponujeni na trgu, cenejši, kot bi bili v primeru, da bi FSO zapustila trg [20].
In addition, it is generally recognized that an increase in the production capacity available on a market tends to depress the prices of the product concerned.
Poleg tega je splošno priznano dejstvo, da povečanje proizvodne zmogljivosti, ki je na voljo na trgu, znižuje cene zadevnega proizvoda.
The lower car prices will therefore harm competitors.
Nižje cene avtomobilov bodo zato škodovale konkurentom.
The Commission observes that, according to the forecast included in the restructuring plan, FSO’s production will over the long term account for between 1 and 2 % of EU car production.
Komisija ugotavlja, da bo v skladu z napovedjo, ki je vključena v načrt za prestrukturiranje, proizvodnja FSO v daljšem obdobju predstavljala med 1 in 2 % avtomobilske proizvodnje EU.
However, as acknowledged by the Polish authorities, the cars produced by FSO will mainly be in competition with car models of similar size and price.
Vendar, kakor priznavajo poljski organi, bodo avtomobili, ki jih proizvaja FSO, v glavnem konkurirali modelom avtomobilov podobne velikosti in cene.
Therefore the market share in that particular segment cannot be considered ‘negligible’ within the meaning of point 36 of the guidelines.
Zaradi tega se tržnega deleža v tem tržnem segmentu ne more obravnavati kot „zanemarljivega“ v smislu točke 36 smernic.
The Commission concludes from the foregoing analysis that the aid keeping FSO alive on a market suffering from overcapacity will negatively affect FSO’s competitors: production plants bidding for construction of the same model, production plants producing competing models and car manufacturers producing competing models.
Komisija iz prejšne analize sklepa, da bo pomoč, ki ohranja družbo FSO pri življenju na trgu, ki je v težavah zaradi prevelikih zmogljivosti, negativno vplivala na konkurente družbe FSO: proizvodne obrate, ki se potegujejo za izdelavo istega modela, proizvodne obrate, ki proizvajajo konkurenčne modele, in proizvajalce avtomobilov, ki proizvajajo konkurenčne modele.
Therefore, the Commission considers that measures are necessary to limit the distortion created by the aid.
Zato Komisija meni, da so ukrepi potrebni zaradi omejitve izkrivljanja, ki je posledica pomoči.
In deciding on the level of these measures, the Commission takes into account the mitigating factors that the company is located in an assisted area and that its market share is small.
Pri odločanju o ravni teh ukrepov Komisija upošteva kot blažilne dejavnike, da se družba nahaja na območju, ki prejema pomoč, in da je njen tržni delež majhen.
In the course of the procedure, the Polish authorities have proposed various compensatory measures.
Med postopkom so poljski organi predlagali različne izravnalne ukrepe.
Firstly, the Polish authorities have said that FSO has reduced its sales network by reducing the number of sales outlets.
Kot prvo so poljski organi navedli, da je družba FSO zmanjšala svojo prodajno mrežo z zmanjšanjem števila prodajaln.
However, the Commission observes that, as sales in Poland have declined sharply and some outlets have overdue liabilities vis-à-vis FSO or have gone bankrupt, this rationalisation was necessary for viability reasons and to reduce sales costs.
Vendar Komisija ugotavlja, da je, ker je prodaja na Poljskem zelo upadla in imajo nekatere prodajalne zaostale obveznosti do FSO ali so šle v stečaj, bila ta racionalizacija potrebna zaradi rentabilnosti in zmanjšanja stroškov prodaje.
In addition, some of these outlets were not controlled by FSO and it was the decision of the owners not to sell FSO cars anymore and to sell other brands.
Poleg tega nekatere od teh prodajaln niso bile pod nadzorom FSO in so se lastniki odločili za prenehanje prodaje avtomobilov družbe FSO in preitje na prodajo drugih znamk.
This measure is therefore not an additional effort of FSO and does not restrict the presence of the company on the markets beyond what is justified by the need to restore viability.
Zaradi tega ta ukrep ne pomeni dodatnega prizadevanja FSO in ne omejuje prisotnosti družbe na trgih nad obsegom, ki ga upravičuje potreba po ponovni vzpostavitvi rentabilnosti.
It cannot therefore be accepted as a compensatory measure.
Zato se ga ne more sprejeti kot izravnalni ukrep.
The Polish authorities have also suggested that FSO ‘voluntarily’ limit the number of countries to which it exports its products.
Poljski organi so prav tako omenili, da družba FSO „prostovoljno“ omejuje število držav, v katere izvaža svoje izdelke.
However, the Commission notes that FSO will not produce its own models but will produce under a licence agreement.
Vendar Komisija ugotavlja, da FSO ne bo proizvajala svojih lastnih modelov, temveč bo proizvajala po licenčni pogodbi.
Such a contract limits the countries in which the products can be sold.
Takšna pogodba omejuje število držav, v katerih se izdelki lahko prodajajo.
Therefore, such a limitation is inherent to the business plan and not a concession from FSO, which has no control over it.
Zato je taka omejitev neločljivo povezana s poslovnim načrtom in ni koncesija s strani družbe FSO, ki nad njo nima nadzora.
In addition, the sales forecasts for these countries were not underpinned by sufficient information.
Poleg tega prodajne napovedi za te države niso bile podprte z zadostnimi podatki.
The Polish authorities have proposed dismantling some equipment on FOS’s production lines.
Poljski organi so predlagali demontažo nekatere opreme na proizvodnih linijah FSO.
However, this equipment has to be replaced anyway to produce a new model.
Vendar je treba to opremo v vsakem primeru zamenjati, da bi lahko proizvajali nov model.
Finally, Poland, which has indicated that FSO’s production capacity is [200000-230000] units per year on a two shifts basis, has proposed restricting its production capacity to [140000-170000] units per year until 2008.
Končno, Poljska, ki je navedla, da je proizvodna zmogljivost družbe FSO [200000–230000] enot na leto ob upoštevanju proizvodnje v dveh izmenah, je predlagala omejitev svoje proizvodne zmogljivosti na [140000–170000] enot na leto do leta 2008.
The Commission notes that this corresponds to the level of production forecast by FSO for 2008 (see Table 5) [21].
Komisija ugotavlja, da to ustreza ravni napovedi proizvodnje družbe FSO za leto 2008 (glej preglednico 5) [21].
Therefore, this measure would not be a constraint on the company.
Zato ta ukrep za družbo ne bi pomenil omejitve.
To summarise, none of the measures proposed by the Polish authorities represent concessions by FSO.
Da povzamemo, nobeden od ukrepov, ki jih predlagajo poljski organi, ne predstavlja koncesij s strani FSO.
They do not limit FSO’s market presence more than the measures necessary to restore viability would do in any case.
Prisotnosti FSO na trgu ne omejujejo bolj, kot bi to v vsakem primeru povzročili ukrepi, potrebni za ponovno vzpostavitev rentabilnosti.
Thus they cannot compensate for the distortion created by the aid.
Tako ne morejo kompenzirati izkrivljanja, ki ga povzroča pomoč.
Undue distortions of competition are therefore not avoided.
Nedovoljena izkrivljanja konkurence zato niso preprečena.
As the Commission considers that measures are necessary to limit the distortion of competition, it has decided to make the compatibility of the aid conditional on compliance with the following measures:
Ker Komisija meni, da so ukrepi potrebni, da se omeji izkrivljanje konkurence, se je odločila, da za združljivost pomoči zahteva izpolnitev naslednjih ukrepov:
Annual production of passenger cars, including all kinds of assembly kits, will be limited to 150000 units until the end of February 2011 [22], […].
letna proizvodnja osebnih avtomobilov, vključno z vsemi vrstami sklopov za sestavljanje, bo omejena na 150000 enot do konca februarja 2011 [22], […];
Annual sales of passenger cars in the EU [23] will be limited to 107000 units until the end of February 2011 [24].
letna prodaja osebnih avtomobilov v EU [23] bo omejena na 107000 enot do konca februarja 2011 [24];
These two conditions apply to FSO, to all its present and future subsidiaries, and to any company controlled by the FSO shareholders to the extent that it operates assets (e.g. plants, production lines) currently belonging to FSO or its subsidiaries.
ta dva pogoja veljata za družbo FSO, za vse njene sedanje in prihodnje hčerinske družbe in za katero koli družbo pod nadzorom delničarjev FSO do mere, do katere posluje s sredstvi (npr. obrati, proizvodne linije), ki so sedaj v lasti družbe FSO ali njenih hčerinskih družb.
The Commission considers this condition appropriate to reduce the distortion of competition created by the aid.
Komisija meni, da ta pogoj zadošča za zmanjšanje izkrivljanja konkurence, ki jo povzroča pomoč.
On the basis of the production forecasts provided by the Polish authorities, this condition will constitute a constraint on the company only for two, or, at a maximum, three years and two months [25].
Na podlagi prodajnih napovedi, ki so jih predložili poljski organi, bo ta pogoj predstavljal omejitev za družbo le za dve leti ali največ tri leta in dva meseca [25].
Thus, during that period, the condition will oblige the company to produce and sell fewer cars.
Tako bo v tem obdobju ta pogoj prisilil družbo, da bo proizvajala in prodajala manj avtomobilov.
These limitations also mean that the company will not be able to bid for any additional license agreements requiring production during this period.
Te omejitve prav tako pomenijo, da se družba ne bo mogla potegovati za kakršne koli dodatne licenčne pogodbe, ki bi v tem obdobju zahtevale proizvodnjo.
By setting the production ceiling (duration, level) so that the restrictive effect is limited to two – at the maximum three – years and two months, the Commission has taken into account the status of the region where the company is located and its small market share.
Z določitvijo zgornje meje proizvodnje (trajanje, raven), tako da je omejevalni učinek omejen na dve leti – največ tri – leta in dva meseca, je Komisija upoštevala stanje v regiji, kjer se družba nahaja in njen majhen tržni delež.
Aid limited to the minimum necessary
Pomoč, omejena na najmanjši potrebni znesek
In the decision to launch the investigation procedure, the Commission expressed doubts as to whether all the aid was necessary.
V odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka preiskave je Komisija izrazila pomisleke o tem, ali je bila vsa pomoč potrebna.
In particular, the Commission observed that the granting of certain measures had been made conditional on finding an investor.
Zlasti je Komisija ugotovila, da je bil pogoj za dodelitev nekaterih ukrepov pridobitev investitorja.
The aid therefore seemed to constitute a way to attract an investor rather than being strictly limited to what the company really needed to survive.
Zato se zdi, da je pomoč pomenila bolj način za pritegnitev investitorja, kakor da bi bila strogo omejena na to, kar je družba resnično potrebovala za preživetje.
The investigation procedure has allayed these doubts.
Postopek preiskave je te dvome omilil.
Indeed, the Commission finds that without the support of an investor and a licensor the company on its own could not have survived.
Komisija dejansko ugotavlja, da brez podpore investitorja in dajalca licence družba sama ne bi mogla preživeti.
FSO had no model of its own to produce, nor did it have the capability to develop a completely new one.
FSO ni imela lastnega modela, ki bi ga proizvajala, niti ni imela zmogljivosti za razvoj povsem novega modela.
Furthermore, the lack of interest manifested by the 29 biggest car manufacturers following the approaches made by FSO in February 2004 shows that the firm was in a very difficult situation and that even with the aid it did not represent a manifestly viable and profitable firm.
Poleg tega pomanjkanje interesa, ki ga je kazalo 29 največjih proizvajalcev avtomobilov po poskusih navezave stikov s strani FSO februarja 2004, kaže na to, da je bila družba v zelo težkem položaju in da celo z zagotovljeno pomočjo očitno ni predstavljala rentabilnega in donosnega podjetja.
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission concludes that the fact that part of the aid was made conditional on finding an investor does not mean that this aid was in excess of the minimum necessary to restore FSO to viability.
Na podlagi navedenega Komisija ugotavlja, da dejstvo, da je bil pogoj za del pomoči pridobitev investitorja, ne pomeni, da je pomoč presegala najmanjši znesek, potreben za ponovno vzpostavitev rentabilnosti FSO.
In order to assess whether the aid is limited to the minimum necessary, the Commission has analysed which parties have supported and will support the restructuring costs.
Da bi ocenila, ali je pomoč omejena na najmanjši potrebni znesek, je Komisija analizirala, katere stranke so in bodo podpirale stroške prestrukturiranja.
These are mainly made up of the costs of restructuring the company’s liabilities.
Ti so v glavnem sestavljeni iz stroškov prestrukturiranja obveznosti družbe.
For a smaller amount, the company also needed a guarantee to get the investment loan to finance the modernisation of the production line necessary to produce the new model.
Za manjši znesek je družba prav tako potrebovala garancijo za najetje investicijskega posojila za financiranje posodobitve proizvodne linije, potrebne za proizvodnjo novega modela.
As previously indicated (see Table 3), FSO signed an agreement with its main creditors.
Kot je bilo predhodno navedeno (glej preglednico 3), je FSO podpisala dogovor s svojimi glavnimi upniki.
Under this agreement, DMC converted claims against FSO amounting to PLN [2-3] million [26] […] into capital.
Po tem dogovoru je DMC pretvoril terjatve do družbe FSO v višini [2–3] milijonov [26] PLN […] v kapital.
The State Treasury did the same for an amount of PLN [400-800] million […].
Državna zakladnica je storila enako z zneskom v višini [400–800] milijonov PLN […].
As indicated in paragraph 55, the Commission considers this conversion to be free of aid.
Kot je navedeno v odstavku 55, Komisija meni, da ta pretvorba ne vsebuje elementa pomoči.
In this agreement of September 2003, private banks undertook to waive claims against FSO amounting to PLN [0,7-1,2] billion […], and more than half of this commitment has already been implemented.
V tem dogovoru iz septembra 2003 so se zasebne banke zavezala odpovedati terjatvam do FSO v višini [0,7–1,2] milijarde PLN […] in več kot polovica te zaveze je že bila izvedena.
Smaller claims against FSO were also restructured, so that an additional PLN [120-230] million […] was written off. The debt conversions and write-offs directly reduce the amount of aid necessary to save the company.
Manjše terjatve do družbe FSO so bile prav tako prestrukturirane, tako da je bilo odpisanih dodatnih [120–230] milijonov PLN […]. Pretvorbe dolgov in odpisi neposredno znižujejo znesek pomoči, potreben za rešitev družbe.
Indeed, if these creditors had not accepted the conversions and write-offs of their claims, the reimbursement of these liabilities would have been due immediately and additional aid would have been necessary to reimburse them and thereby avoid the bankruptcy of FSO.
Če ti upniki ne bi pristali na pretvorbo in odpis svojih terjatev, bi vračilo teh obveznosti zapadlo dejansko takoj in bi bila potrebna dodatna pomoč za njihovo vračilo in s tem za preprečitev stečaja družbe FSO.
In total, not counting the debt conversion by the State Treasury, the contribution made by FSO’s private creditors amounts to PLN [2,8-4,4] billion […].
Skupaj, če ne upoštevamo pretvorbe dolga državne zakladnice, znaša prispevek zasebnih upnikov družbe FSO [2,8–4,4] milijarde PLN […].
Besides the contribution just described, Poland has indicated that over recent years AvtoZAZ has pre-financed its orders to FSO, which have represented nearly the entire production of the Polish firm.
Poleg pravkar opisanega prispevka je Poljska navedla, da je v zadnjih letih podjetje AvtoZAZ predfinanciralo svoja naročila FSO, ki so predstavljala skoraj celotno proizvodnjo poljskega podjetja.
This pre-financing permitted FSO, which had no liquidity available, to finance the production (of the cars ordered e.g. buying inputs).
To predfinanciranje je družbi FSO, ki ni imela na voljo likvidnih sredstev, omogočilo, da financira proizvodnjo (naročenih avtomobilov, npr. nakup vložkov).
The pre-financed orders have made it possible for the company to operate over the last few years.
Predfinancirana naročila so podjetju omogočila poslovanje zadnjih nekaj let.
This kind of pre-financing is not common practice in the car industry, especially for a firm in difficulty.
Ta vrsta predfinanciranja ni običajna praksa v avtomobilski industriji, zlasti ne za podjetje v težavah.
It can then be concluded that AvtoZAZ, through this exceptional pre-financing to FSO, has contributed to financing the company during its restructuring period.
Zaključimo lahko, da je AvtoZAZ preko tega izrednega predfinanciranja FSO, prispeval k financiranju družbe v obdobju njenega prestrukturiranja.
This private contribution is a sign that the market believes in the viability of the firm.
Ta zasebni prispevek je znak, da trg verjame v rentabilnost podjetja.
According to the information submitted by the Polish authorities, the amount of advance payments from AvtoZAZ amounted at some points in time to USD [10-50] million […].
Po podatkih, ki so jih predložili poljski organi, je znesek predplačil s strani AvtoZAZ znašal v nekaterih obdobjih [10–50] milijonov USD […].
As indicated, at the exchange rate of 20 October 2006, the maximum aid amount to be granted after accession is EUR 82 million or PLN 318 million.
Kot je navedeno, je pri menjalnem tečaju z dne 20. oktobra 2006, najvišji znesek pomoči, ki bo dodeljen po pristopu, 82 milijonov EUR ali 318 milijonov PLN.
In assessing whether the aid is limited to the minimum necessary, the Commission has also to take into account the aid granted before Poland’s accession in the framework of the same restructuring.
Pri oceni, ali je pomoč omejena na najmanjši potrebni znesek, mora Komisija prav tako upoštevati pomoč, dodeljeno pred pristopom Poljske v okviru istega prestrukturiranja.
As indicated before, the Commission considers the maximum aid amount granted in the quarters before accession to be PLN 201 million (EUR 51 million).
Kot je bilo predhodno navedeno, Komisija meni, da je znašala najvišja pomoč, dodeljena v četrtletjih pred pristopom, 201 milijonov PLN (51 milijonov EUR).
The maximum total restructuring aid therefore amounts to PLN 519 million (EUR 133 million).
Tako znaša najvišja skupna pomoč za prestrukturiranje 519 milijonov PLN (133 milijonov EUR).
It may be concluded from the above that the private sector contribution covers more than 85 % of the restructuring costs, and the aid less than 15 %.
Iz zgoraj navedenega se lahko sklepa, da prispevek zasebnega sektorja pokriva več kot 85 % stroškov prestrukturiranja, pomoč pa manj kot 15 %.
Even if the (aid-free) conversion of debt by the State were considered a restructuring cost, the private sector contribution amounts to more than three quarters of the restructuring costs.
Celo če bi pretvorbo dolga (ki ne vsebuje elementa pomoči) s strani države šteli za strošek prestrukturiranja, znaša prispevek zasebnega sektorja več kot tri četrtine stroškov prestrukturiranja.
The Commission considers the contribution from the private creditors to be substantial.
Komisija meni, da je prispevek zasebnih upnikov precejšen.
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission concludes that the aid is limited to the minimum necessary.
Na podlagi navedenega Komisija sklepa, da je pomoč omejena na najmanjši potrebni znesek.
‘One time, last time’ principle
Načelo „enkratnosti pomoči“
On the basis of the information provided by the Polish authorities, the Commission concludes that the company has not received restructuring aid in the last ten years.
Na podlagi podatkov, ki so jih predložili poljski organi, Komisija sklepa, da družba v zadnjih desetih letih ni prejemala pomoči za prestrukturiranje.
During the current restructuring, the first aid measures were granted in the last quarter of 2003.
Med sedanjim prestrukturiranjem so bili prvi ukrepi pomoči dodeljeni v zadnjem četrtletju leta 2003.
This condition is therefore respected.
Ta pogoj je torej izpolnjen.
The Commission concludes that the notified aid is compatible with the common market, if certain conditions are fulfilled,
Komisija je sklenila, da je priglašena pomoč združljiva s skupnim trgom, če so izpolnjeni določeni pogoji –