natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
département du Jura: arrondissement de Dole et cantons d’Arbois, de Poligny, de Villers-Farlay;
département du Jura: arrondissement de Dole et cantons d’Arbois, de Poligny, de Villers-Farlay
département du Loir-et-Cher: cantons de Lamotte-Beuvron, de Mennetou-sur-Cher, de Salbris;
département du Loir-et-Cher: cantons de Lamotte-Beuvron, de Mennetou-sur-Cher, de Salbris
département du Loiret: arrondissements de Montargis et de Pithiviers et cantons de Chateauneuf-sur-Loire, de Chécy, de La Ferté-Saint-Aubin, de Fleury-les-Aubrais, de Jargeau, de Neuville-aux-Bois, d’Olivet, d’Orléans-la-Source, d’Ouzouer-sur-Loire, de Saint-Jean-de-Braye, de Saint-Jean-le-Blanc, de Sully-sur-Loire;
département du Loiret: arrondissements de Montargis et de Pithiviers et cantons de Chateauneuf-sur-Loire, de Chécy, de La Ferté-Saint-Aubin, de Fleury-les-Aubrais, de Jargeau, de Neuville-aux-Bois, d’Olivet, d’Orléans-la-Source, d’Ouzouer-sur-Loire, de Saint-Jean-de-Braye, de Saint-Jean-le-Blanc, de Sully-sur-Loire
département de la Marne;
département de la Marne
département de la Haute-Marne;
département de la Haute-Marne
département de la Meurthe-et-Moselle;
département de la Meurthe-et-Moselle
département de la Meuse;
département de la Meuse
département de la Moselle;
département de la Moselle
département de la Nièvre;
département de la Nièvre
département du Nord;
département du Nord
département de l’Oise;
département de l’Oise
département de l’Orne: cantons de l’Aigle, de l’Aigle-Est, de l’Aigle-Ouest, de Bazoches-sur-Hoëne, de Courtomer, d’Exmes, de La Ferté-Frenel, de Gacé, de Longny-au-Perche, de Melé-sur-Sarthe, de Merlerault, de Mortagne-au-Perche, de Mortrée, de Moulins-la-Marche, de Nocé, de Pervenchères, de Rémalard, de Sées, de Tourouvre, de Trun, de Vimoutiers;
département de l’Orne: cantons de l’Aigle, de l’Aigle-Est, de l’Aigle-Ouest, de Bazoches-sur-Hoëne, de Courtomer, d’Exmes, de La Ferté-Frenel, de Gacé, de Longny-au-Perche, de Melé-sur-Sarthe, de Merlerault, de Mortagne-au-Perche, de Mortrée, de Moulins-la-Marche, de Nocé, de Pervenchères, de Rémalard, de Sées, de Tourouvre, de Trun, de Vimoutiers
département du Pas-de-Calais;
département du Pas-de-Calais
département du Puy-de-Dôme: cantons de Aigueperse, de Combronde, de Manzat, de Menat, de Montaigut, de Pionsat, de Pontaumur, de Pontgibaud, de Saint-Gervais-d’Auvergne;
département du Puy-de-Dôme: cantons de Aigueperse, de Combronde, de Manzat, de Menat, de Montaigut, de Pionsat, de Pontaumur, de Pontgibaud, de Saint-Gervais-d’Auvergne
département du Bas-Rhin;
département du Bas-Rhin
département du Haut-Rhin: arrondissements de Colmar, de Guebwiller, de Ribeauvillé, de Thann et cantons d’Illzach, de Wittenheim;
département du Haut-Rhin: arrondissements de Colmar, de Guebwiller, de Ribeauvillé, de Thann et cantons d’Illzach, de Wittenheim
département de la Haute-Saône;
département de la Haute-Saône
département de la Saône-et-Loire: arrondissement d’Autun et cantons de Bourbon-Lancy, de Chagny, de Digoin, de Givry, de Gueugnon, de Montceau-les-Mines, de Montceau-les-Mines-Nord, de Montchanin, de Palinges, de Pierre-de-Bresse, de Toulon-sur-Arroux, de Verdun-sur-le-Doubs;
département de la Saône-et-Loire: arrondissement d’Autun et cantons de Bourbon-Lancy, de Chagny, de Digoin, de Givry, de Gueugnon, de Montceau-les-Mines, de Montceau-les-Mines-Nord, de Montchanin, de Palinges, de Pierre-de-Bresse, de Toulon-sur-Arroux, de Verdun-sur-le-Doubs
département de la Ville de Paris;
département de la Ville de Paris
département de la Seine-Maritime;
département de la Seine-Maritime
département de la Seine-et-Marne;
département de la Seine-et-Marne
département des Yvelines;
département des Yvelines
département de la Somme;
département de la Somme
département des Vosges;
département des Vosges
département de l’Yonne;
département de l’Yonne
département du Territoire-de-Belfort: cantons de Belfort, de Fontaine, de Giromagny, d’Offemont, de Rougemont-le-Château, de Valdoie;
département du Territoire de Belfort: cantons de Belfort, de Fontaine, de Giromagny, d’Offemont, de Rougemont-le-Château, de Valdoie
département de l’Essonne;
département de l’Essonne
département des Hauts-de-Seine;
département des Hauts-de-Seine
département de Seine-Saint-Denis;
département de Seine-Saint-Denis
département du Val-de-Marne;
département du Val-de-Marne
département du Val-d’Oise.’
département du Val-d’Oise“
The list of restricted zones in Zone F (serotype 8) is amended adding the following territories of Austria:
Seznam območij z omejitvami v območju F (serotip 8) se spremeni z dodatkom naslednjih ozemelj Avstrije:
‘Austria:
„Avstrija:
Federal Province Vorarlberg, district Bregenz, municipality Gaißau and the nature protection area within the municipalities Höchst, Fußach and Hard’.
Federal Province Vorarlberg, distrikt Bregenz, municipality Gaißau and the nature protection area within the municipalities Höchst, Fußach and Hard.“
The list of restricted zones in Zone I (serotypes 1 and 4) is amended adding the following territories of Portugal:
Seznam območij z omejitvami v območju I (serotipa 1 in 4) se spremeni z dodatkom naslednjih ozemelj Portugalske:
Direcção de Serviços de Veterinária da Região do Algarve: todos os concelhos’.
Direcção de Serviços de Veterinária da Região do Algarve: todos os concelhos.“
Direcção de Serviços de Veterinária da Região de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo: todos os concelhos; Direcção de Serviços de Veterinária da Região Centro: concelhos de Idanha-a-Nova, Castelo Branco, Proença-a-Nova, Vila Velha de Ródão, Mação, Penamacor e Fundão’.
Direcção de Serviços de Veterinária da Região de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo: todos os concelhos; Direcção de Serviços de Veterinária da Região Centro: concelhos de Idanha-a-Nova, Castelo Branco, Proença-a-Nova, Vila Velha de Ródão, Mação, Penamacor e Fundão.“
The list of restricted zones in Zone F (serotype 8) which relates to Czech Republic is replaced by the following:
Seznam območij z omejitvami v območju F (serotip 8) za Češko se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Czech Republic:
„Češka:
Region of Ústí nad Labem: district Chomutov, district Louny, district Most, district Teplice, district Usti nad Labem, district Decin and district Loitomerice’.
Region of Ústí nad Labem: district Chomutov, district Louny, district Most, district Teplice, district Usti nad Labem, district Decin and district Loitomerice.“
The list of restricted zones in Zone F (serotype 8) which relates to Denmark is replaced by the following:
Seznam območij z omejitvami v območju F (serotip 8) za Dansko se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Denmark:
„Danska:
In Storstroem county: municipality of Lolland and Guldborgsund’.
In Storstroem county: municipality of Lolland and Guldborgsund.“
The list of restricted zones in Zone F (serotype 8) is amended adding the following territories of the United Kingdom:
Seznam območij z omejitvami v območju F (serotip 8) se spremeni z dodatkom naslednjih ozemelj Združenega kraljestva:
North East Lincolnshire’.
North East Lincolnshire“
Political and Security Committee Decision EUPOL AFG/1/2007
Sklep Političnega in varnostnega odbora EUPOL AFG/1/2007
concerning the appointment of the Head of Mission of EUPOL AFGHANISTAN
o imenovanju vodje misije EUPOL AFGHANISTAN
(2007/685/CFSP)
(2007/685/SZVP)
Having regard to Council Joint Action 2007/369/CFSP of 30 May 2007 on the establishment of the European Union Police Mission in Afghanistan (EUPOL AFGHANISTAN) [1] and in particular Article 10(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Skupnega ukrepa Sveta 2007/369/SZVP z dne 30. maja 2007 o ustanovitvi policijske misije Evropske unije v Afganistanu (EUPOL AFGHANISTAN) [1], zlasti člena 10(1)
Whereas:
Skupnega ukrepa,ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
Article 10 of Council Joint Action 2007/369/CFSP provides that the Council authorises the Political and Security Committee to take the relevant decisions in accordance with Article 25 of the Treaty, including powers to take subsequent decisions regarding the appointment of the Head of EUPOL AFGHANISTAN.
Člen 10 Skupnega ukrepa Sveta 2007/369/SZVP določa, da Svet pooblasti Politični in varnostni odbor za sprejemanje ustreznih odločitev v skladu s členom 25 Pogodbe, vključno s pooblastitvijo o odločitvi o imenovanju vodje misije EUPOL AFGHANISTAN.
In a letter dated 6 October 2007, the current Head of Mission informed the European Commission of his decision to terminate his contract, with effect from end of business on 31 October 2007.
V pismu z dne 6. oktobra 2007 je sedanji vodja misije obvestil Komisijo Evropske unije o svoji odločitvi, da zaključi svojo pogodbo z učinkom od 31. oktobra 2007.
The Secretary General/High Representative has proposed the appointment of Mr Jürgen Scholz as the New Head of Mission of EUPOL AFGHANISTAN,
Generalni direktor/visoki predstavnik je predlagal, da se za novega vodjo misije EUPOL AFGHANISTAN imenuje g. Jürgen Scholz –
Mr Jürgen Scholz is hereby appointed Head of EUPOL AFGHANISTAN.
Jürgen Scholz je imenovan za vodjo misije EUPOL AFGHANISTAN.
This Decision shall take effect on 1 November 2007.
Ta sklep začne učinkovati s 1. novembrom 2007.
OJ L 139, 31.5.2007, p. 33.
UL L 139, 31.5.2007, str. 33.
relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the Treaty establishing the European Community against Armando Álvarez SA, Bernay Film Plastique, Bischof + Klein France SAS, Bischof + Klein GmbH & Co. KG, Bonar Technical Fabrics NV, British Polythene Industries PLC, Cofira-Sac SA, Combipac BV, Fardem Packaging BV, FLSmidth & Co. A/S, FLS Plast A/S, Groupe Gascogne, JM Gesellschaft für industrielle Beteiligungen mbH & Co. KGaA, Kendrion NV, Koninklijke Verpakkingsindustrie Stempher CV, Low & Bonar PLC, Nordenia International AG, Nordfolien GmbH, Plásticos Españoles SA, RKW AG Rheinische Kunststoffwerke, Sachsa Verpackung GmbH, Stempher BV, Trioplast Industrier AB, Trioplast Wittenheim SA, UPM-Kymmene Oyj
v zvezi s postopkom na podlagi člena 81 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti proti Armando Álvarez SA, Bernay Film Plastique, Bischof + Klein France SAS, Bischof + Klein GmbH & Co. KG, Bonar Technical Fabrics N.V., British Polythene Industries PLC, Cofira-Sac SA, Combipac B.V., Fardem Packaging B.V., FLSmidth & Co. A/S, FLS Plast A/S, Groupe Gascogne, JM Gesellschaft für industrielle Beteiligungen mbH & Co. KGaA, Kendrion N.V., Koninklijke Verpakkingsindustrie Stempher C.V., Low & Bonar PLC, Nordenia International AG, Nordfolien GmbH, Plásticos Españoles S.A., RKW AG Rheinische Kunststoffwerke, Sachsa Verpackung GmbH, Stempher B.V., Trioplast Industrier AB, Trioplast Wittenheim SA, UPM-Kymmene Oyj
(Case COMP/38354 — Industrial bags)
(Zadeva COMP/38354 – industrijske vreče)
(notified under document number C(2005) 4634)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2005) 4634)
(Only the French, English, Dutch, German and Spanish versions are authentic)
(Besedila v angleškem, francoskem, nemškem, nizozemskem in španskem jeziku so edina verodostojna)
On 30 November 2005 the Commission adopted a decision relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty.
Komisija je 30. novembra 2005 sprejela Odločbo v zvezi s postopkom na podlagi člena 81 Pogodbe ES.
In accordance with the provisions of Article 30 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 [1], the Commission herewith publishes the names of the parties and the main content of the decision, including any penalties imposed, having regard to the legitimate interest of undertakings in the protection of their business secrets.1.
Komisija v skladu z določbami iz člena 30 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1/2003 [1] objavlja imena strank in glavno vsebino Odločbe ter sankcije, ki so jim bile po potrebi naložene, ob upoštevanju pravnega interesa podjetij do varovanja poslovnih skrivnosti.1.
The decision is addressed to the following undertakings for having infringed Article 81(1) of the EC Treaty:
Ta odločba je zaradi kršitve člena 81(1) Pogodbe ES naslovljena na naslednja podjetja:
Combipac BV and British Polythene Industries plc;
Combipac B.V. in British Polythene Industries PLC,
RKW AG Rheinische Kunststoffwerke and JM Gesellschaft für industrielle Beteiligungen mbH & Co. KGaA;
RKW AG Rheinische Kunststoffwerke in JM Gesellschaft für industrielle Beteiligungen mbH & Co. KGaA,
Fardem Packaging BV and Kendrion NV;
Fardem Packaging BV in Kendrion NV,
Nordenia International AG and Nordfolien GmbH;
Nordenia International AG in Nordfolien GmbH,
Trioplast Wittenheim SA and Trioplast Industrier AB;
Trioplast Wittenheim SA in Trioplast Industrier AB,
FLS Plast A/S and FLSmidth & Co. A/S;
FLS Plast A/S in FLSmidth & Co. A/S,
Plásticos Españoles SA (hereinafter Aspla) and Armando Álvarez SA;
Plásticos Españoles SA (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Aspla“) in Armando Álvarez SA,
Sachsa Verpackung GmbH and Groupe Gascogne;
Sachsa Verpackung GmbH in Groupe Gascogne,
Bernay Film Plastique, formerly Conditionnement et Industrie SA;
Bernay Film Plastique, prej Conditionnement et Industrie SA,
Bonar Technical Fabrics NV and Low & Bonar PLC;
Bonar Technical Fabrics N.V. in Low & Bonar PLC,
Stempher BV and Koninklijke Verpakkingsindustrie Stempher CV.
Stempher BV in Koninklijke Verpakkingsindustrie Stempher C.V.
The addressees referred to above participated in a single and continuous infringement of Article 81 of the EC Treaty, covering the Benelux, France, Germany and Spain [2], by which they agreed to fix prices of industrial bags, to set common models for price calculation, to allocate market shares and quotas, to allocate customers and deals, to proceed to concerted submissions to tenders and to exchange individualised information.
Zgornji naslovniki so sodelovali v enotni in dolgotrajni kršitvi člena 81 Pogodbe ES, ki je obsegala Beneluks, Francijo, Nemčijo in Španijo [2], v kateri so se naslovniki sporazumeli o določanju cen industrijskih vreč, oblikovanju skupnih modelov za izračun cen, razdelitvi tržnih deležev in kvot, razdelitvi strank in poslov, o usklajenih ponudbah na javne razpise in izmenjavi notranjih informacij.
The duration of the infringement proper to each addressee retained in the decision is ranging from three to 20 years.
Trajanje kršitve za vse naslovnike iz Odločbe obsega obdobje od 3 do 20 let.
The industrial bags sector
Sektor industrijskih vreč
Plastic industrial bags [3], commonly referred to as ‘industrial bags’, are used for packaging basic commodities, and more generally raw materials, fertilisers, polymers, building materials, agricultural and horticultural products and animal feeding stuffs.
Plastične industrijske vreče [3], običajno imenovane „industrijske vreče“, se uporabljajo za pakiranje osnovnega blaga ter bolj na splošno surovin, umetnih gnojil, polimerov, gradbenega materiala, kmetijskih in vrtnarskih izdelkov ter krme za živali.
Plastic industrial bags can be divided into four categories:
Plastične industrijske vreče je mogoče razdeliti v štiri kategorije:
open mouth bags,
vreče z odprtim ustjem,
valve bags,
vreče z ventilom,
FFS (form, fill and seal) bags,
vreče vrste oblikuj, napolni in zapri („form, fill and seal – FFS“),
Block bags.
blok vreče.
Since the beginning of the 1990s a trend towards concentration can be observed among manufacturers of plastic films and bags, and several acquisitions have taken place in recent years.
Od začetka devetdesetih let 20. stoletja je bilo med proizvajalci plastičnih folij in vreč opaziti trend v smeri koncentracij, v preteklih letih je bilo opravljenih več nakupov podjetij.
Nevertheless, alongside European players based in several EU Member States, smaller companies that have opted for a local development strategy are also present on this market.
Kljub temu pa so poleg vseevropskih proizvajalcev, ki imajo sedeže v različnih državah članicah EU, na tem trgu prisotna tudi manjša podjetja, ki so se odločila za lokalno razvojno strategijo.
Until the 1950s, industry used textile and paper bags for carrying commodities.
Do petdesetih let 20. stoletja je industrija za prevoz blaga uporabljala tekstilne in papirnate vreče.
With the development of bulk maritime transport, the textile bags industry went into decline.
Z razvojem pomorskega prometa z razsutim tovorom je industrija tekstilnih vreč začela izgubljati svoj pomen.
The introduction of the polyethylene bag in the 1950s triggered growing demand for this type of bag, which among other things met industry's needs for waterproof packaging.
Uvedba polietilenskih vreč v petdesetih letih 20. stoletja je sprožila rastoče povpraševanje po tej vrsti vreč, saj so te med drugim izpolnjevale potrebe industrije po vodoodporni embalaži.
Since the mid-1970s, FFS bags have gradually been replacing the other types of industrial bags.
Od sredine sedemdesetih let 20. stoletja vreče tipa FFS postopno nadomeščajo druge vrste industrijskih vreč.
Their success is due notably to the automated filling process, which allows large volumes to be handled, and the limited need for labour.
Njihov uspeh je zlasti posledica samodejnega postopka polnjenja, ki omogoča obdelavo velikih količin in majhno število delovne sile.
Scope of the infringement
Obseg kršitve
The investigation showed that the cartel covered the Benelux, the French, German and Spanish markets.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je kartel obsegal trge v Beneluksu, Franciji, Nemčiji in Španiji.
Origin and procedure
Začetek in postopek
In November 2001, the company BPI informed the Commission of the existence of a cartel in the industrial bags sector and expressed the wish to cooperate with the Commission under the 1996 Notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases (Leniency Notice) [4].
V novembru 2001 je podjetje BPI obvestilo Komisijo o obstoju kartela v sektorju industrijskih vreč ter izrazilo željo, da bi s Komisijo sodelovalo po določilih Obvestila Komisije o imuniteti pred globami in zmanjševanju glob v primerih kartelov iz leta 1996 („obvestilo o prizanesljivosti“) [4].
BPI provided the Commission with evidence that allowed the carrying out of inspections in June 2002.
Podjetje BPI je Komisiji posredovalo dokaze, ki so omogočali, da so bili v juniju 2002 opravljeni inšpekcijski pregledi.
The cartel operated basically at two levels:
Kartel je dejansko deloval na dveh ravneh:
the global level under the umbrella of an official professional organization called ‘Valve-Plast’.
na globalni ravni pod okriljem uradnega strokovnega združenja, imenovanega „Valve-Plast“.
The meetings were held at least since 1982 and three or four times a year.
Sestanki so tri ali štirikrat letno potekali najmanj od leta 1982.
A functional sub-group dedicated to block bags was set up in 1994,
Delovna podskupina za blok vreče je bila oblikovana v letu 1994.
the sub-group level composed of five regional subgroups (France, Germany, Benelux, Belgium and Netherlands).
Podskupino je sestavljalo pet regionalnih podskupin (za Francijo, Nemčijo, Beneluks, Belgijo in Nizozemsko).
The anticompetitive practices identified covered in particular:
Ugotovljeno protikonkurenčno ravnanje je vključevalo zlasti:
fixation of prices and setting of common models for calculating prices,
določanje cen in oblikovanje skupnih modelov za izračun cen,
allocation of quotas,
določanje kvot,
allocation of clients and deals,
razdeljevanje strank in poslov,
discussions during the meetings over lists of major clients, designation of account managers in charge of coordinating the offers to those clients,
razprave med sestanki o seznamih glavnih strank in določanje računovodij, zadolženih za usklajevanje ponudb tem strankam,
multilateral and bilateral discussions over specific customers, submissions of concerted bids,
večstranske in dvostranske razprave o posameznih strankah, usklajene ponudbe na javne razpise,
regular exchange of sensitive information related to market shares.
redno izmenjavo občutljivih informacij, povezanih s tržnimi deleži.
Regarding the nature of the infringement and its geographic scope, the infringement must be qualified as very serious.
Glede na vrsto kršitve in njen geografski obseg je treba kršitev opredeliti kot zelo resno.
Within the category of very serious infringements, the scale of applicable fines makes it possible to apply differential treatment to undertakings in order to take account of the effective economic capacity to cause significant damage to competition.
V kategoriji zelo hudih kršitev razpon možnih glob omogoča uporabo različnega obravnavanja podjetij, da se tako upošteva dejanska gospodarska zmogljivost kršiteljev pri povzročanju precejšnje škode konkurenci.
This is appropriate where, as in this case, there are considerable disparities in terms of importance between the undertakings participating in the infringement.
To je primerno, kadar obstajajo med podjetji, ki so sodelovala v kršitvi, velike razlike glede njihove pomembnosti, kot v tem primeru.
The undertakings have been divided into six categories according to their relative importance in the relevant market in 1996.
Podjetja so bila razdeljena v šest kategorij glede na njihovo relativno pomembnost na zadevnem trgu v letu 1996.
1996 was used a reference year because it was the closest complete year of infringement in which all the undertakings implicated in the cartel were still present on the relevant market.
Leto 1996 je bilo izbrano za referenčno leto zato, ker je najbližje celotno leto kršitve, v katerem so bila vsa v kartel vključena podjetja še vedno prisotna na zadevnih trgih.
With market shares estimated at 12,5 % and 11,5 %, Wavin/BPI and Bischof + Klein are placed in the first category.
S tržnima deležema ocenjenima na 12,5 % oziroma 11,5 % sta podjetji Wavin/BPI in Bischof + Klein vključeni v prvo kategorijo.
Nordenia/Nordfolien are placed in the second category with a market share of 8,9 %.
Nordenia/Nordfolien je uvrščeno v drugo kategorijo s tržnim deležem 8,9 %.
Aspla (7,2 %) and Fardem (6,6 %) are placed in the third category.
Aspla (7,2 %) in Fardem (6,6 %) sta uvrščena v tretjo kategorijo.
UPM-Kymmene (4,8 %), RKW (4,6 %) and Stempher (4,3 %) are placed in the fourth category.
Podjetja UPM-Kymmene (4,8 %), RKW (4,6 %) in Stempher (4,3 %) so uvrščena v četrto kategorijo.
Bonar Technical Fabrics (3,1 %), Cofira (2,9 %) and Trioplast Wittenheim (2,8 %) are placed in the fifth category.
Bonar Technical Fabrics (3,1 %), Cofira (2,9 %) in Trioplast Wittenheim (2,8 %) so uvrščena v peto kategorijo.
Sachsa (2,3 %), Bischof + Klein France (1,9 %) and Bernay Film Plastique (1,6 %) are placed in the sixth category.
Sachsa (2,3 %), Bischof + Klein France (1,9 %) in Bernay Film Plastique (1,6 %) so uvrščena v šesto kategorijo.
For Stempher (Koninklijke Verpakkingsindustrie Stempher CV and Stempher BV), there is no evidence in the file of its knowledge of the global scheme of the cartel.
Za podjetje Stempher (Koninklijke Verpakkingsindustrie Stempher C.V. in Stempher BV) v spisu ni dokazov, da je vedelo za globalno shemo kartela.
Its participation has been limited to one of the subgroups dealing only with the Dutch market (and from time to time with Belgium).
Njegovo sodelovanje je omejeno na eno podskupino, ki je delovala zgolj na nizozemskem trgu (in občasno na belgijskem).
Therefore a reduction of 25 % is applied to the basic amount of the fine imposed on Stempher.
Zato se za osnovni znesek globe, naložene podjetju Stempher, uporabi zmanjšanje v višini 25 %.
Within the category of very serious infringements, the scale of the fines that can be imposed also makes it possible to set the fines at a level which ensures that they have sufficient deterrent effect, having regard to the size and the economic power of each undertaking.
Stopnja možnih glob omogoča znotraj kategorije zelo hudih kršitev tudi določitev glob na ravni, ki zagotavlja njihov zadosten odvračilni učinek, ob upoštevanju velikosti in gospodarske moči vsakega podjetja.
In this respect, the Commission notes that in 2004, the most recent business year preceding this decision, the turnover of the UPM-Kymmene group was EUR 9820 million. Accordingly, it is considered appropriate, to apply a multiplication factor of two to the fine imposed on UPM-Kymmene.
V zvezi s tem Komisija ugotavlja, da je promet skupine UPM-Kymmene v letu 2004, zadnjem finančnem letu pred sprejetjem te odločbe, znašal 9820 milijonov EUR. Zato se zdi primerno, da se globa, naložena podjetju UPM-Kymmene, pomnoži s faktorjem 2.