natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1086/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1086/2007
amending Regulation (EC) No 1054/2007 fixing the export refunds on white and raw sugar exported without further processing
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1054/2007 o določitvi izvoznih nadomestil za beli sladkor in surovi sladkor, ki se izvaža brez nadaljnje predelave
Export refunds on products listed in Article 1(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 were fixed from 14 September 2007 by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1054/2007 [2].
Izvozna nadomestila za proizvode iz člena 1(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 318/2006 so bila določena od 14. septembra 2007 z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1054/2007 [2].
Regulation (EC) No 1054/2007 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Uredbo (ES) št. 1054/2007 je treba zato ustrezno spremeniti –
The Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1054/2007 is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga k Uredbi (ES) št. 1054/2007 se nadomesti z besedilom v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
Export refunds on white and raw sugar exported without further processing applicable from 20 September 2007 [1]NB: The destinations are defined as follows:
Izvozna nadomestila, ki se od 20. septembra 2007 [1] uporabljajo za beli sladkor in surovi sladkor, izvožen brez nadaljnje predelave N.B.: Opredeljeni namembni kraji:
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1086/2007 of 19 September 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 1054/2007 fixing the export refunds on white and raw sugar exported without further processing
Popravek Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1086/2007 z dne 19. septembra 2007 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1054/2007 o določitvi izvoznih nadomestil za beli sladkor in surovi sladkor, ki se izvaža brez nadaljnje predelave
(Official Journal of the European Union L 245 of 20 September 2007)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 245 z dne 20. septembra 2007)
On Page 31, the Annex should read as follows:
Priloga na strani 31 se glasi:
Where the yield for exported raw sugar differs from 92 % the refund amount applicable shall be multiplied, for each exporting operation concerned, by a conversion factor obtained by dividing by 92 the yield of the raw sugar exported, calculated in accordance with paragraph 3 of Point III of the Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 318/2006.’
Če donos izvoženega sladkorja ni 92 %, se znesek nadomestila, ki se uporablja, pri vsakem zadevnem izvozu pomnoži s pretvorbenim faktorjem, ki se dobi, če se z 92 deli donos izvoženega surovega sladkorja, izračunanega v skladu z odstavkom 3 točke III Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 318/2006.“
Council Regulation (EC) No 1087/2007
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1087/2007
amending Regulation (EC) No 1487/2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain finished polyester filament fabrics originating in the People’s Republic of China
o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1487/2005 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih dokončanih tkanin iz poliestrskih filamentov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Articles 9 and 12 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškem uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (osnovna uredba), in zlasti členov 9 in 12 Uredbe,
In September 2005, following an anti-dumping investigation (the original investigation) the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1487/2005 [2], imposed definitive anti-dumping duties (the original measures) on imports of certain finished polyester filament fabrics (FPFAF) originating in the People’s Republic of China (China).
Svet je septembra 2005 po protidampinški preiskavi („prvotna preiskava“) z Uredbo (ES) št. 1487/2005 [2] uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve („prvotni ukrepi“) na uvoz nekaterih dokončanih tkanin iz poliestrskih filamentov (FPFAF) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („Kitajska“).
The duty rates applicable to Chinese FPFAF varied from 14,1 % to 56,2 %.
Stopnje dajatev, ki se uporabljajo za kitajski FPFAF, se gibljejo med 14,1 % in 56,2 %.
On 13 November 2006, a request for a reinvestigation of the original measures was lodged pursuant to Article 12 of the basic Regulation.
Dne 13. novembra 2006 je bil vložen zahtevek za ponovno preiskavo prvotnih ukrepov na podlagi člena 12 osnovne uredbe.
The request was submitted by AIUFFASS (the applicant), on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 30 % of the total Community production of FPFAF.
Zahtevek je predložil AIUFFASS („vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 30 %, celotne proizvodnje FPFAF v Skupnosti.
The applicant submitted sufficient information showing that following the imposition of the original anti-dumping duties on FPFAF originating in China export prices have decreased and that there has been insufficient movement in resale prices or subsequent selling prices in the Community.
Vložnik je predložil zadostne informacije o tem, da so po uvedbi prvotnih protidampinških dajatev na FPFAF s poreklom iz Kitajske izvozne cene padle in da pri cenah pri nadaljnji prodaji oziroma nadaljnjih prodajnih cenah v Skupnosti ni bilo bistvenih sprememb.
This allegedly resulted in an increase of dumping which has impeded the intended remedial effects of the measures in force.
To je povzročilo domnevno povečanje dampinga, ki ovira načrtovane popravljalne učinke veljavnih ukrepov.
The applicant also provided evidence that imports of the product concerned from China have continued to enter in significant quantities the Community market.
Vložnik je poleg tega predložil dokaze, da je bil uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Kitajske na trg Skupnosti še naprej znaten.
On 28 December 2006, the Commission announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union (NOI) [3] the initiation of a reinvestigation, pursuant to Article 12 of the basic Regulation, of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of FPFAF originating in China.
Komisija je 28. decembra 2006 z obvestilom (NOI), objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3], skladno s členom 12 osnovne uredbe razglasila začetek ponovne preiskave glede protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo pri uvozu FPFAF s poreklom iz Kitajske.
The Commission officially advised the producers/exporters known to be concerned, the representatives of the exporting country, importers and users of the initiation of the reinvestigation.
Komisija je o začetku ponovne preiskave uradno obvestila znane zadevne proizvajalce/izvoznike, predstavnike države izvoznice, uvoznike in uporabnike.
The Commission sent questionnaires to all parties known to be concerned.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike vsem znanim zadevnim strankam.
In view of the high number of exporting producers and importers concerned during the original investigation, sampling was envisaged in the NOI in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na veliko število zadevnih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in uvoznikov, vključenih v prvotno preiskavo, je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, all exporting producers and importers were asked to make themselves known to the Commission and to provide basic information.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in če je, da bi izbrala vzorec, so bili proizvajalci izvozniki in uvozniki pozvani, da se javijo Komisiji in predložijo osnovne informacije.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary to determine whether export prices have decreased and if there has been insufficient movement in resale prices or subsequent selling prices in the Community.
Komisija je zahtevala in preverila vse podatke, ki so bili po njenem mnenju potrebni za določitev, ali so se izvozne cene znižale in ali pri cenah pri nadaljnji prodaji oziroma nadaljnjih prodajnih cenah v Skupnosti ni bilo bistvenih sprememb.
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the cooperating exporters/producers in China and their related companies where necessary:
Po potrebi so bili preveritveni obiski opravljeni v prostorih sodelujočih izvoznikov/proizvajalcev na Kitajskem in njihovih povezanih družb:
Nantong Teijin Co Ltd and its related importer NI-Teijin Shoji Europe GmbH,
Nantong Teijin Co. Ltd in njen povezan uvoznik NI-Teijin Shoji Europe GmbH
Hangzhou Delicacy Textile Co Ltd,
Hangzhou Hongfeng Textile Group Co. Ltd
Wujiang Xiangsheng Textile dyeing & Finishing Co Ltd and its related company,
Wujiang Xiangsheng Textile dyeing & Finishing Co. Ltd in njena povezana družba
The investigation period of this reinvestigation (new IP) ran from 1 October 2005 to 30 September 2006.
Obdobje te ponovne preiskave („novo OP“) je trajalo od 1. oktobra 2005 do 30. septembra 2006.
The new IP was used to determine the current level of export prices and the level of the prices delivered to the first independent customer in the Community.
Ugotavljali sta se sedanja raven izvoznih cen in raven dobavnih cen za prvega neodvisnega kupca v Skupnosti.
In establishing whether the prices in the Community had moved sufficiently, the price levels charged during the new IP were compared to those charged during the original investigation period (original IP) which had covered the period from 1 April 2003 to 30 March 2004.
Za ugotovitev, ali so se cene v Skupnosti dovolj gibale, so se primerjale ravni cen, zaračunanih v obdobju nove preiskave, ter cen, zaračunanih v obdobju prvotne preiskave („prvotnim OP“), ki je trajalo od 1. aprila 2003 do 30. marca 2004.
It should be noted that the Commission had to allow sufficient time to the Parties to make themselves known and to select a sample of exporting producers in China in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Treba je opozoriti, da mora Komisija v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe dati strankam dovolj časa, da se javijo, in izbrati vzorec proizvajalcev izvoznikov na Kitajskem.
In view of various exceptional circumstances, the cooperating parties also requested extensions to submit their replies.
Sodelujoče stranke so zaradi nepredvidljivih okoliščin zaprosile za podaljšanje rokov za predložitev svojih vprašalnikov.
These extensions were granted when duly justified.
Upravičena podaljšanja so bila odobrena.
For these reasons, the reinvestigation slightly exceeded the normal period of six months provided for in Article 12(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je ponovna preiskava rahlo presegla običajni rok šestih mesecev, ki je določen v členu 12(4) osnovne uredbe.
PRODUCT UNDER CONSIDERATION
OBRAVNAVANI IZDELEK
The product for which the reinvestigation was initiated is the same as in the original investigation, namely finished polyester filament apparel fabrics (FPFAF), normally classified within CN codes ex54075100, 54075200, 54075400, ex54076110, 54076130, 54076190 and ex54076910 and ex54076990.
Izdelek, zaradi katerega je bila začeta ponovna preiskava, je isti kot v prvotni preiskavi, tj. dokončane tkanine iz poliestrskih filamentov („FPFAF“), trenutno uvrščene pod oznake KN ex54075100, 54075200, 54075400, ex54076110, 54076130, 54076190 in ex54076910 ter ex54076990.
The product concerned is woven fabrics of synthetic filament yarn containing 85 % or more by weight of textured and/or non-textured polyester filament, dyed (including dyed white) or printed originating in the People’s Republic of China.
Zadevni izdelek so tkanine iz preje iz sintetičnih filamentov, ki vsebujejo po masi 85 % ali več teksturiranih in/ali neteksturiranih poliestrskih filamentov, barvanih (vključno z beljenimi) ali potiskanih, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
The product concerned is used mainly in the textile industry.
Zadevni izdelek uporablja predvsem tekstilna industrija.
THE REINVESTIGATION
PONOVNA PREISKAVA
In general, a reinvestigation pursuant to Article 12 of the basic Regulation aims at establishing whether or not there was a sufficient movement in prices in the Community of FPFAF originating in China further to the imposition of original anti-dumping measures.
Na splošno je namen ponovne preiskave v skladu s členom 12 osnovne uredbe ugotoviti, ali je zaradi uvedbe prvotnih protidampinških ukrepov v Skupnosti prišlo do zadostnega gibanja cen FPFAF s poreklom iz Kitajske.
As a second step, where it is concluded that absorption took place, a new dumping margin should be calculated.
Če se sklene, da so se dajatve absorbirale, je treba izračunati novo stopnjo dampinga.
Article 12 of the basic Regulation provides for an opportunity to importers/users and exporters to submit evidence that could justify a lack of movement in prices in the Community following the imposition of measures for reasons other than absorption of the anti-dumping duty.
V skladu s členom 12 osnovne uredbe morajo dobiti uvozniki/uporabniki in izvozniki možnost, da predložijo dokaze, s katerimi lahko utemeljijo pomanjkljivo gibanje cen v Skupnosti po uvedbi ukrepov iz razlogov, ki niso povezani z absorpcijo protidampinške dajatve.
As mentioned in recital (6) above the Commission requested all exporting producers and importers to make themselves known and to provide basic information on their activities during the new IP.
Kot je bilo navedeno v uvodni izjavi 6, je Komisija pozvala, da se med novim OP vsi proizvajalci izvozniki in uvozniki javijo in predložijo osnovne informacije o svojih dejavnostih.
These parties were also requested to indicate their willingness to be included in a sample.
Zadevne stranke so bile tudi pozvane, da navedejo svojo pripravljenost za vključitev v vzorec.
Exporters/producers
Izvozniki/proizvajalci
Twenty-six exporters/producers agreed to provide the requested information and to be included in a sample.
Šestindvajset izvoznikov/proizvajalcev se je strinjalo s predložitvijo zahtevanih informacij in vključitvijo v vzorec.
Given the large number of exporters/producers, it was decided that sampling was necessary with regards to establishing possible absorption by exporters/producers in China.
Ob upoštevanju velikega števila izvoznikov/proizvajalcev je bilo sklenjeno, da je vzorčenje potrebno v zvezi z določitvijo morebitne absorpcije s strani izvoznikov/proizvajalcev na Kitajskem.
While preference was given to companies included in the sample of the original investigation, a selection was made, which covered the largest representative volume of exports and can be reasonably investigated within the time available.
Ob prednostnem upoštevanju družb, ki so bile del vzorca v prvotni preiskavi, je bil narejen izbor, ki je omogočil zajetje največjega reprezentativnega obsega izvoza, ki je lahko razumno preiskan v času, ki je na voljo.
In accordance with Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, the Chinese authorities were consulted on the sample and raised no objections.
V skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe je bilo s kitajskimi organi opravljeno posvetovanje o vzorcu, vendar ti niso predložili pripomb.
Just before the verification visits took place in China, two companies (the one with IT and one with MES) decided to withdraw from the sample.
Neposredno pred preveritvenimi obiski na Kitajskem sta se dve družbi (tista z IO in ena s STG) odločili, da v vzorcu ne bosta sodelovali.
These two companies were considered as non-cooperating in the current reinvestigation.
Ti dve družbi sta se v sedanji ponovni preiskavi šteli za nesodelujoči.
As a result, 24 cooperating companies and a sample of seven exporters/producers with MES remained.
Ostalo je štiriindvajset sodelujočih družb in vzorec sedmih izvoznikov/proizvajalcev s STG.
At that stage the Commission observed that no exporters/producers with IT cooperated in the investigation.
Komisija je v tej fazi odkrila, da v preiskavi ni sodeloval noben izvoznik/proizvajalec z IO.
The remaining seven companies included in the sample had all MES and represent around 78 % of the exports to the EU made by all the cooperating companies and 23,9 % of the total Chinese exports of FPFAF to the Community market.
Preostalih sedem družb, vključenih v vzorec, je imelo status tržnega gospodarstva in je predstavljalo približno 78 % izvoza vseh sodelujočih družb v EU ter 23,9 % celotnega kitajskega izvoza FPFAF na trg Skupnosti.
At that stage of the reinvestigation, it was concluded that these companies constituted the largest volume which could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
V tej fazi ponovne preiskave je bilo sklenjeno, da navedene družbe predstavljajo največji obseg izvoza, ki ga je bilo mogoče ustrezno preiskati v razpoložljivem času.
These seven companies were therefore deemed to be representative for the purpose of sampling in the reinvestigation.
Teh sedem družb se zato šteje za reprezentativni vzorec v ponovni preiskavi.
No unrelated importers submitted the requested information within the time limit defined in the NOI.
Noben nepovezan uvoznik ni predložil zahtevanih informacij v roku, določenem v obvestilu.
The 24 cooperating exporters/producers which agreed to be included in the sample represented around 30 % of the total export of Chinese FPFAF to the Community.
Štiriindvajset sodelujočih izvoznikov/proizvajalcev, ki se strinjali z vključitvijo v vzorec, je predstavljalo približno 30 % celotnega izvoza FPFAF iz Kitajske v Skupnost.
As mentioned in recital (14) above, two additional producers withdrew cooperation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 14, sta dva dodatna proizvajalca umaknila svoje sodelovanje.
As a result, non-cooperation finally amounted to around 70 % of total export of FPFAF to the Community market.
Zato je nesodelovanje končno doseglo približno 70 % celotnega izvoza FPFAF na trg Skupnosti.
On that basis, it was considered than non-cooperation in this case was high.
Na tej podlagi se šteje, da je bilo nesodelovanje v tem primeru znatno.
Movement of prices in the Community
Gibanje cen v Skupnosti
It is recalled that no unrelated importers/users of the product concerned offered cooperation for the reinvestigation.
Treba je opozoriti, da noben nepovezan uvoznik/uporabnik zadevnega izdelka ni ponudil sodelovanja v ponovni preiskavi.
As mentioned in recital (18) above, non-cooperation from exporters/producers in China is high.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 18, je nesodelovanje izvoznikov/proizvajalcev s Kitajske znatno.
Except for one exporter/producer included in the sample, the pattern of trade for FPFAF originating in China is characterised by the absence of related intermediaries importing the product concerned into the Community for resale.
Razen enega izvoznika/proizvajalca, vključenega v vzorec, je za vzorec trgovanja s FPFAF s poreklom iz Kitajske značilno, da uvoz zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost za nadaljnjo prodajo ne poteka preko povezanih posrednikov.
The independent buyers of FPFAF are generally user companies which are directly importing the product concerned for their own internal consumption.
Neodvisni kupci FPFAF so običajno družbe uporabnice, ki zadevni izdelek uvažajo neposredno za svojo notranjo porabo.
It was found that the sales conditions for the export sales made by the exporters/producers in the sample during the new IP were generally made on a CIF (cost, insurance and freight) basis.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so vzorčeni izvozniki/proizvajalci med novim OP prodajne pogoje za izvoz oblikovali na podlagi CIF (stroški, zavarovanje in prevoznina).
Therefore, for the purpose of assessing any price movement the price level for the product concerned was first determined at CIF level.
Zato je treba za oceno gibanja ravni cen zadevnega izdelka najprej določiti raven CIF.
For the new IP, the CIF price at the Community border was established on the basis of information submitted by the cooperating Chinese exporters/producers included in the sample.
Za novo OP je bila cena CIF meja Skupnosti določena na podlagi predloženih informacij sodelujočih kitajskih izvoznikov/proizvajalcev, vključenih v vzorec.
Movement in resale price in the Community for the sample companies
Gibanje cen pri nadaljnji prodaji v Skupnosti za vzorčene družbe
In order to assess any movement of prices at exporter/producer level in the Community the average price of FPFAF, on a type by type basis, established for the new IP was compared with the average price of FPFAF established during the original IP at the same level of trade and for the same delivery conditions.
Za oceno kakršnega koli gibanja cen v Skupnosti na ravni izvoznika/proizvajalca je bila ob enaki ravni trgovine in enakih pogojih dostave povprečna cena FPFAF, glede na vrsto izdelka, določena za novo OP, primerjana s povprečno ceno FPFAF, določeno med prvotnim OP.
On that basis, the comparison showed that the average price in the Community of FPFAF originating in China for all the companies included in the sample did not decrease during the new IP.
Na tej podlagi je primerjava pokazala, da povprečna cena FPFAF s poreklom iz Kitajske v Skupnosti za vse družbe, vključene v vzorec, med novim OP ni znižala.
The movement of resale price for one related importer established in the Community was assessed on a type by type basis.
Gibanje cene pri nadaljnji prodaji je bilo za enega povezanega uvoznika v Skupnosti ocenjeno glede na vrsto izdelka.
Resale prices to unrelated customers in the Community were compared for the same delivery conditions between both investigation periods.
Opravljena je bila primerjava cen pri nadaljnji prodaji nepovezanim kupcem v Skupnosti ob upoštevanju enakih pogojev dobave med obema obdobjema preiskave.
Based on the information gathered, it was demonstrated that prices had increased by amounts exceeding the anti-dumping duty.
Na podlagi zbranih informacij se je izkazalo, da so se cene zvišale za zneske, ki presegajo protidampinško dajatev.
Claims made by interested parties
Trditve zainteresiranih strank
Several interested parties claimed that an adjustment should be made to their export price.
Več zainteresiranih strank je trdilo, da je treba prilagoditi njihovo izvozno ceno.
They invoked that the variation in USD/EUR exchange rate led to an artificial decrease of their export price during the new IP.
Poudarili so, da je sprememba menjalnega tečaja USD/EUR privedla do umetnega zmanjšanja njihove izvozne cene med novim OP.
However, given that no price decrease was found during the new IP even before the application of this claimed adjustment which would lead to decreasing prices in the old IP, it was not considered necessary to examine the claim.
Vendar se ob upoštevanju, da med novim OP ni bilo ugotovljeno nobeno zmanjšanje cen niti pred uporabo zahtevane prilagoditve, ki bi pomenila zmanjšanje cen v stari OP, proučitev trditve ni zdela potrebna.
Movement in resale price in the Community for the non-cooperators
Gibanje cen pri nadaljnji prodaji v Skupnosti za nesodelujoče družbe
Given the high level on non-cooperation, around 70 % in this case, an absorption duty should be imposed on all non-cooperating exporters/producers in the PRC.
Ob upoštevanju visoke ravni nesodelovanja, v tem primeru približno 70 %, je treba uvesti absorpcijsko dajatev na vse nesodelujoče izvoznike/proizvajalce v LRK.
The absorption duty should be established on the basis of Article 18 of the basic Regulation, namely on the basis of the best information available.
Absorpcijsko dajatev je treba določiti na podlagi člena 18 osnovne uredbe, in sicer na podlagi dostopnih najboljših informacij.
In the present case it is considered that the data available under the Eurostat import statistic constitutes the most direct and the most reliable that can be used to establish the level at which non-cooperating Chinese exporters were exporting their FPFAF in the Community market.
Za ta primer se šteje, da so Eurostatovi statistični podatki o uvozu najbolj neposredni in zanesljivi za uporabo pri določitvi stopnje izvoza FPFAF kitajskih nesodelujočih izvoznikov na trg Skupnosti.