natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, the Commission has examined the preventive vaccination plan submitted by Portugal, and is satisfied that it conforms with relevant Community legislation.
Poleg tega je Komisija preučila načrt za preventivno cepljenje, ki ga je predložila Portugalska, in je zadovoljna, da je skladen z ustrezno zakonodajo Skupnosti.
In view of the epidemiological situation as regards low pathogenic avian influenza in Portugal, the type of holding to be vaccinated and the limited scope of the vaccination plan, it is appropriate to approve that preventive vaccination plan.
Zaradi epidemiološkega stanja glede nizko patogene aviarne influence na Portugalskem, vrste gospodarstva, kjer bo opravljeno cepljenje, in omejenega obsega načrta cepljenja je primerno odobriti navedeni načrt za preventivno cepljenje.
The implementation of that preventive vaccination plan will also provide with further practical experience and knowledge on the efficacy of vaccine in mallard ducks.
Izvajanje navedenega načrta za preventivno cepljenje bo prav tako zagotovilo dodatne praktične izkušnje in znanje o učinkovitosti cepiva za race mlakarice.
For the purposes of the preventive vaccination plan to be carried out by Portugal, only vaccines authorised in accordance with Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products [6] or Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency [7] should be used.
Za namene načrta za preventivno cepljenje, ki ga bo izvajala Portugalska, je treba uporabljati samo cepiva, odobrena v skladu z Direktivo 2001/82/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. novembra 2001 o zakoniku Skupnosti o zdravilih za uporabo v veterinarski medicini [6] ali Uredbo (ES) št. 726/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o postopkih Skupnosti za pridobitev dovoljenja za promet in nadzor zdravil za humano in veterinarsko uporabo ter o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za zdravila [7].
In addition, surveillance and laboratory testing in the holding keeping the vaccinated mallard ducks and in unvaccinated poultry holdings should be carried out as set out in the preventive vaccination plan.
Poleg tega je treba izvajati nadzor in laboratorijske preiskave na gospodarstvu, kjer se gojijo cepljene race mlakarice, in na gospodarstvih z necepljeno perutnino, kakor je določeno v načrtu za preventivno cepljenje.
It is also appropriate to introduce certain restrictions on the movement of vaccinated mallard ducks, their hatching eggs and mallard ducks derived from vaccinated poultry in accordance with the preventive vaccination plan.
Prav tako je v skladu z načrtom za preventivno cepljenje primerno uvesti nekatere omejitve za premike cepljenih rac mlakaric, njihova valilna jajca ter race mlakarice iz cepljene perutnine.
Due to the small number of mallard ducks present on the holding where preventive vaccination is to be carried out, as well as for reasons of traceability and logistics, vaccinated birds should not be moved from that holding.
Zaradi majhnega števila rac mlakaric na gospodarstvu, kjer je treba izvesti preventivno cepljenje, kakor tudi iz razlogov sledljivosti in logistike, se cepljenih jat ne sme premikati z navedenega gospodarstva.
In relation to trade in poultry intended for restocking supplies of game, additional measures have been taken by Portugal pursuant to Commission Decision 2006/605/EC of 6 September 2006 on certain protection measures in relation to intra-Community trade in poultry intended for restocking of wild game supplies [8].
V zvezi s trgovino s perutnino, namenjeno za obnovo populacije divjih ptic, je Portugalska sprejela dodatne ukrepe v skladu z Odločbo Komisije 2006/605/ES z dne 6. septembra 2006 o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi s trgovino perutnine znotraj Skupnosti, namenjene za obnovo populacije divjih ptic [8].
In order to reduce the economic impact on the holding concerned, certain derogations from movement restrictions for mallard ducks derived from vaccinated mallard ducks should be provided for, since such movements do not pose a specific risk for spread of disease and provided that official surveillance is carried out and that the specific animal health requirements for intra-Community trade are complied with.
Da bi se zmanjšal gospodarski učinek na zadevno gospodarstvo, je treba predvideti nekatera odstopanja od omejitev premikov za race mlakarice iz cepljenih rac mlakaric, saj takšni premiki ne predstavljajo posebne nevarnosti širjenja bolezni, ter pod pogojem, da se izvaja uradni nadzor ter so izpolnjene posebne zahteve glede zdravstvenega varstva živali za trgovino znotraj Skupnosti.
The preventive vaccination plan should be approved so that it can be implemented until 31 July 2009.
Načrt za preventivno cepljenje je treba potrditi, da bo lahko izveden do 31. julija 2009.
Decision 2008/285/EC should be repealed as it has become obsolete after 31 July 2008.
Odločbo 2008/285/ES je treba razveljaviti, saj je po 31. juliju 2008 postala zastarela.
This Decision lays down certain measures to be applied in Portugal where preventive vaccination of mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) intended for re-stocking supplies of game (mallard ducks) is carried out in a holding, which is exposed to the risk of avian influenza.
Ta odločba določa nekatere ukrepe, ki jih mora izvesti Portugalska, kadar se preventivno cepljenje rac mlakaric (Anas platyrhynchos), namenjenih za obnovo populacije divjih ptic („race mlakarice“), izvede na gospodarstvu s tveganjem okužbe z aviarno influenco.
Those measures include certain restrictions on the movement within and dispatch from Portugal of the vaccinated mallard ducks, their hatching eggs and mallard ducks derived thereof.
Navedeni ukrepi vključujejo nekatere omejitve premikov na Portugalskem in odpošiljanja cepljenih rac mlakaric, njihovih valilnih jajc ter rac mlakaric, izvaljenih iz njih iz, Portugalske.
Approval of the preventive vaccination plan
Odobritev načrta za preventivno cepljenje
The plan for preventive vaccination against low pathogenic avian influenza in Portugal, as submitted by Portugal to the Commission on 10 September 2008, to be implemented on a holding in the region of Lisboa e Vale do Tejo, Ribatejo Norte, Vila Nova da Barquinha until 31 July 2009 (the preventive vaccination plan) is approved.
Načrt za preventivno cepljenje proti nizko patogeni aviarni influenci na Portugalskem, kakor ga je Portugalska predložila Komisiji 10. septembra 2008, ki ga je treba izvesti na gospodarstvu v regiji Lisboa e Vale do Tejo, Ribatejo Norte, Vila Nova da Barquinha do 31. julija 2009 („načrt preventivnega cepljenja“), se odobri.
The Commission shall publish the preventive vaccination plan.
Komisija objavi načrt za preventivno cepljenje.
Portugal shall ensure that the mallard ducks are vaccinated in accordance with the preventive vaccination plan with a bivalent inactivated heterologous vaccine containing both avian influenza subtypes H5 and H7 authorised by that Member State in accordance with Directive 2001/82/EC or Regulation (EC) No 726/2004.
Portugalska zagotovi, da se race mlakarice cepijo v skladu z načrtom za preventivno cepljenje z dvovalentnim inaktiviranim heterolognim cepivom, ki vsebuje oba podtipa aviarne influence H5 in H7, ki ga je odobrila navedena država članica v skladu z Direktivo 2001/82/ES ali Uredbo (ES) št. 726/2004.
Portugal shall ensure that surveillance and laboratory testing of the holding keeping the vaccinated mallard ducks and in unvaccinated poultry holdings, as set out in the preventive vaccination plan, is carried out.
Portugalska izvaja nadzor in laboratorijske preiskave na gospodarstvu, kjer se gojijo cepljene race mlakarice, in na gospodarstvih z necepljeno perutnino, kakor je določeno v načrtu za preventivno cepljenje.
Portugal shall ensure that the preventive vaccination plan is implemented efficiently.
Portugalska zagotovi, da se načrt za preventivno cepljenje izvaja učinkovito.
not moved to other poultry holdings within Portugal or dispatched to other Member States.
ne preselijo na druga perutninska gospodarstva na Portugalskem ali odpošljejo v druge države članice.
After their reproductive period, such ducks shall be killed humanely on the holding referred to in Article 2(1) and their carcases safely disposed of.
Po njihovem obdobju reprodukcije se takšne race pokončajo na human način na gospodarstvu iz člena 2(1), njihova trupla pa se varno uničijo.
Restrictions on the movement and dispatch of hatching eggs originating from the holding referred to in Article 2(1)
Omejitve premikov in odpošiljanja valilnih jajc, ki izvirajo z gospodarstva iz člena 2(1)
The competent authority shall ensure that hatching eggs originating from mallard ducks on the holding referred to in Article 2(1) may only be moved to a hatchery within Portugal and not dispatched to other Member States.
Pristojni organ zagotovi, da se lahko valilna jajca rac mlakaric na gospodarstvu iz člena 2(1) premaknejo samo v valilnico na Portugalskem in se ne smejo odpošiljati v druge države članice.
The competent authority shall ensure that mallard ducks derived from vaccinated mallard ducks may only be moved after hatching to a holding located in a surrounding area established in Portugal in relation to the holding referred to in Article 2(1) as set out in the preventive vaccination plan.
Pristojni organ zagotovi, da se lahko race mlakarice iz cepljenih rac mlakaric premaknejo po izvalitvi samo na gospodarstvo na območju na Portugalskem, ki se nahaja v bližnji okolici gospodarstva iz člena 2(1), kakor je določeno v načrtu za preventivno cepljenje.
the results of the surveillance and laboratory tests as set out in the preventive vaccination plan, are favourable; and
so rezultati nadzora in laboratorijskih testov, določenih v načrtu za preventivno cepljenje, zadovoljivi ter
the conditions for dispatch of poultry for re-stocking supplies of wild game laid down in Decision 2006/605/EC are met.
so pogoji za odpošiljanje perutnine za obnovo populacije divjih ptic iz Odločbe 2006/605/ES izpolnjeni.
Health certification for intra-Community trade in mallard ducks derived from vaccinated mallard ducks
Izdajanje veterinarskih spričeval za promet znotraj Skupnosti z racami mlakaricami iz cepljenih rac mlakaric
Portugal shall ensure that health certificates for intra-Community trade in poultry intended for re-stocking supplies of game referred to in Article 6(2)(b) include the following sentence:
Portugalska zagotovi, da veterinarska spričevala za promet znotraj Skupnosti s perutnino, namenjeno za obnovo populacije divjih ptic iz člena 6(2)(b), vključujejo naslednji stavek:
‘The animal health conditions of this consignment are in accordance with Decision 2008/838/EC.Article 8
„Zdravstveno stanje živali iz te pošiljke je v skladu z Odločbo 2008/838/ES.Člen 8
Portugal shall submit to the Commission a report on the implementation of the preventive vaccination plan within one month from the date of application of this Decision and give quarterly reports at the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health thereafter.
Portugalska predloži Komisiji poročilo o izvajanju načrta za preventivno cepljenje v enem mesecu od datuma začetka uporabe te odločbe, četrtletna poročila pa nato pošilja Stalnemu odboru za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali.
Decision 2008/285/EC shall be repealed.
Odločba 2008/285/ES se razveljavi.
This Decision shall apply until 31 July 2009.
Ta odločba se uporablja do 31. julija 2009.
OJ L 92, 3.4.2008, p. 37.
UL L 92, 3.4.2008, str. 37.
The EFSA Journal (2005) 266, 1-21, Scientific Opinion on Animal health and welfare aspects of avian influenza.
The EFSA Journal (2005) 266, str. 1–21, Znanstveno mnenje o vplivih aviarne influence na zdravje in dobro počutje živali.
The EFSA Journal (2007) 489, Scientific Opinion on Vaccination against avian influenza of H5 and H7 subtypes in domestic poultry and captive birds.
The EFSA Journal (2007) 489, Znanstveno mnenje o cepljenju domače perutnine in ptic v ujetništvu proti aviarni influenci podtipov H5 in H7.
The EFSA Journal (2008) 715, 1-161, Scientific Opinion on Animal health and welfare aspects of avian influenza and the risks of its introduction into the EU poultry holdings.
The EFSA Journal (2008) 715, str. 1–161, Znanstveno mnenje o vplivih aviarne influence na zdravje in dobro počutje živali in tveganjih njene uvedbe na perutninska gospodarstva EU.
OJ L 299, 8.11.2008, p. 40.’.
UL L 299, 8.11.2008, str. 40.“
Council Decision 2008/839/JHA
Sklep Sveta 2008/839/PNZ
on migration from the Schengen Information System (SIS 1+) to the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)
o migraciji s schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS 1+) na drugo generacijo schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II)
The Schengen Information System (SIS), set up pursuant to the provisions of Title IV of the Convention of 19 June 1990 implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders [2] (the Schengen Convention), and the further development thereof, SIS 1+, constitute essential tools for the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis as integrated into the framework of the European Union.
Schengenski informacijski sistem (SIS), vzpostavljen v skladu z določbami naslova IV Konvencije z dne 19. junija 1990 o izvajanju schengenskega sporazuma z dne 14. junija 1985 med vladami držav Gospodarske unije Beneluks, Zvezne republike Nemčije in Francoske republike o postopni odpravi kontrol na skupnih mejah [2] (Schengenska konvencija), in njegov nadaljnji razvoj SIS 1+ sta bistveno orodje za uporabo določb schengenskega pravnega reda, kakor je vključen v okvir Evropske unije.
The development of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) was to the Commission pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001 [3] and Council Decision 2001/886/JHA [4].
Razvoj druge generacije Schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) je bil zaupan Komisiji v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2424/2001 [3] in Sklepom Sveta 2001/886/PNZ [4].
Those instruments expire on 31 December 2008.
Veljavnost obeh pravnih instrumentov se izteče 31. decembra 2008.
This Decision should therefore supplement them until a date to be fixed by the Council acting in accordance with Council Decision 2007/533/JHA of 12 June 2007 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) [5].
Ta sklep bi moral zato dopolnjevati navedena instrumenta do dneva, ki ga določi Svet v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2007/533/PNZ z dne 12. junija 2007 o vzpostavitvi, delovanju in uporabi druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) [5].
SIS II was established by Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) [6] and by Council Decision 2007/533/JHA.
SIS II je bil vzpostavljen z Uredbo (ES) št. 1987/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o vzpostavitvi, delovanju in uporabi druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) [6] in Sklepom Sveta 2007/533/PNZ.
This Decision should be without prejudice to the provisions of those acts.
Ta sklep ne bi smel posegati v določbe navedenih aktov.
Certain tests of SIS II are provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 189/2008 [7] and in Council Decision 2008/173/EC [8].
Nekateri preskusi SIS II so predvideni v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 189/2008 [7] in Sklepu Sveta 2008/173/ES [8].
The development of SIS II should be continued and should be finalised in the framework of the SIS II global schedule endorsed by the Council on 6 June 2008.
Razvoj SIS II bi bilo treba nadaljevati in dokončati v okviru splošnega časovnega načrta za SIS II, ki ga je Svet potrdil 6. junija 2008.
A comprehensive test of SIS II should be conducted in full cooperation between the Member States and the Commission, in accordance with the provisions of this Decision.
Celoviti preskus SIS II bi bilo treba opraviti s popolnim sodelovanjem med državami članicami in Komisijo v skladu z določbami tega sklepa.
As soon as possible after its completion, the test should be validated as provided for by Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and Decision 2007/533/JHA.
Takoj ko je to mogoče po njegovi izvedbi, bi se preskus moral potrditi, kakor to ureja Uredba (ES) št. 1987/2006 in Sklep 2007/533/PNZ.
Member States should perform a test on the exchange of supplementary information.
Države članice bi morale opraviti preskus izmenjave dopolnilnih podatkov.
As regards SIS 1+, the Schengen Convention provides for a technical support function (C.SIS).
Za SIS 1+ predvideva Schengenske konvencije tehnični podporni del (C.SIS).
As regards SIS II, Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and Decision 2007/533/JHA provide for a Central SIS II composed of a technical support function and a uniform national interface (NI-SIS).
Za SIS II predvidevata Uredba (ES) št. 1987/2006 in Sklep 2007/533/PNZ centralni SIS II sestavljen iz tehničnega podpornega dela in enotnega nacionalnega vmesnika (NI-SIS).
The technical support function of Central SIS II should be located in Strasbourg (France) and a back-up in St. Johann im Pongau (Austria).
Tehnični podporni del centralnega SIS II bi se moral nahajati v Strasbourgu (Francija), pomožna centralna enota v kraju Sankt Johann im Pongau (Avstrija).
In order to better manage the potential difficulties brought about by the migration from SIS 1+ to SIS II an interim migration architecture for the Schengen Information System should be established and tested.
Za lažje reševanje težav, ki bi se lahko pojavile pri prehodu s SIS 1+ na SIS II, bi bilo treba vzpostaviti in preizkusiti začasno strukturo za migracijo za schengenski informacijski sistem.
The interim migration architecture should have no impact on the operational availability of SIS 1+.
Začasna arhitektura za migracijo ne bi smela vplivati na operativno razpoložljivost SIS 1+.
A converter should be provided by the Commission.
Komisija bi morala zagotoviti pretvornik.
The Member State issuing an alert should be responsible for ensuring that the data entered into the Schengen Information System is accurate, up-to-date and lawful.
Država članica, ki izda razpis ukrepa, bi morala biti odgovorna za točnost in ažurnost podatkov ter zakonitost vnašanja podatkov v schengenski informacijski sistem.
The Commission should remain responsible for Central SIS II and its communication infrastructure.
Komisija bi morala biti še naprej odgovorna za centralni SIS II ter njegovo komunikacijsko infrastrukturo.
This responsibility includes the maintenance and continuation of the development of SIS II and its communication infrastructure, including at all times the correction of errors.
Ta odgovornost vključuje vzdrževanje ter nadaljnji razvoj SIS II in njegove komunikacijske infrastrukture, vključno s stalnim odpravljanjem napak.
The Commission should provide coordination and support for the joint activities.
Komisija bi morala zagotavljati usklajevanje in podporo pri skupnih dejavnostih.
The Commission should provide, in particular, the necessary technical and operational support to the Member States at Central SIS II level including the availability of a helpdesk.
Državam članicam bi morala zagotavljati zlasti potrebno tehnično in operativno podporo na ravni centralnega SIS II ter službo za pomoč uporabnikom.
The Member States are and should remain responsible for the development and maintenance of their national systems (N.SIS II).
Države članice so in bi morale biti še naprej odgovorne za razvoj in vzdrževanje svojih nacionalnih sistemov (N.SIS II).
France should remain responsible for the technical support function of SIS 1+, as expressly provided for in the Schengen Convention.
Francija bi morala biti še naprej odgovorna za delovanje tehničnega podpornega dela SIS 1+, kot je izrecno predvideno v Schengenski konvenciji.
Representatives of the Member States participating in SIS 1+ should coordinate their actions within the framework of the Council.
Predstavniki držav članic, ki sodelujejo v SIS 1+, bi morali svoje dejavnosti usklajevati v okviru Sveta.
It is necessary to set out a framework for that organisational action.
Za te organizacijske dejavnosti je treba vzpostaviti ustrezen okvir.
The Commission should be empowered to contract out to third parties, including national public bodies, tasks conferred upon it by this Decision and tasks relating to the implementation of the budget, in accordance with Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [9].
Komisija bi morala imeti pooblastila, da na tretje strani, vključno z nacionalnimi javnimi organi, pogodbeno prenese naloge, ki so ji zaupane s tem sklepom, in naloge v zvezi z izvrševanjem proračuna v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [9].
Any such contract should respect the rules of data protection and data security and take into account the role of the relevant data protection authorities applicable to the SIS, in particular the provisions of the Schengen Convention and of this Decision.
Vsaka tovrstna pogodba bi morala spoštovati pravila o varstvu in varnosti podatkov ter upoštevati vlogo ustreznih organov za varstvo podatkov, ki veljajo za SIS, zlasti določbe Schengenske konvencije in tega sklepa.
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [10] applies to the processing of personal data by the Commission.
Komisija pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov uporablja Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [10].
The European Data Protection Supervisor, appointed pursuant to Decision 2004/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 December 2003 appointing the independent supervisory body provided for in Article 286 of the EC Treaty [11], is competent to monitor the activities of the Community institutions and bodies in relation to the processing of personal data.
Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov, imenovan v skladu s Sklepom 2004/55/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. decembra 2003 o imenovanju neodvisnega nadzornega organa, kakor je določeno v členu 286 Pogodbe ES [11], je pristojen za spremljanje dejavnosti institucij in organov Skupnosti v zvezi z obdelavo osebnih podatkov.
The Schengen Convention contains specific provisions on the protection and security of personal data.
Schengenska konvencija vsebuje posebne določbe o varstvu in varnosti osebnih podatkov.
Since the objectives of setting up the interim migration architecture and migrating the data from SIS 1+ to SIS II, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale and effects of the action, be better achieved at the level of the Union, it is considered that the adoption of the present measure is in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty Establishing the European Community and referred to in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker ciljev vzpostavitve začasne strukture za migracijo ter migracija podatkov iz SIS 1+ v SIS II, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker se ta cilj zaradi obsega in učinkov ukrepa lažje doseže na ravni Unije, je sprejetje tega ukrepa skladno z načelom subsidiarnosti, kakor je določeno v členu 5 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in navedeno v členu 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.