natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As for the relevant products intended for exports to Dominican Republic under the quota 2008/2009 referred to in the Decision 98/486/EC, and complying with the conditions laid down in Chapter III, Section 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1282/2006, the following rates should apply:(a) products falling within CN codes 0402 10 11 9000 and 0402 10 19 90000,00 EUR/100 kg(b) products falling within CN codes 0402 21 11 9900, 0402 21 19 9900, 0402 21 91 9200 and 0402 21 99 92000,00 EUR/100 kg
Za ustrezne izdelke, namenjene izvozu v Dominikansko republiko v okviru kvote za 2008/2009, določene s Sklepom 98/486/ES, ki so v skladu s pogoji iz oddelka 3, poglavja III Uredbe (ES) št. 1282/2006, se uporabljajo naslednje stopnje:(a) izdelki, ki spadajo pod oznake KN 0402 10 11 9000 in 0402 10 19 90000,00 EUR/100 kg(b) izdelki, ki spadajo pod oznake KN 0402 21 11 9900, 0402 21 19 9900, 0402 21 91 9200 in 0402 21 99 92000,00 EUR/100 kg.
Including Kosovo, under the aegis of the United Nations, pursuant to UN Security Council Resolution 1244 of 10 June 1999.
Vključno s Kosovom, pod pokroviteljstvom Združenih narodov, na podlagi resolucije Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov 1244 z dne 10. junija 1999.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 387/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 387/2008
These prices and duties have been last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 350/2008 [4].
Navedene cene in dolžnosti so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 350/2008 [4].
OJ L 109, 19.4.2008, p. 5.
UL L 109, 19.4.2008, str. 5.
Amended representative prices and additional duties applicable to imports of white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 17029095 applicable from 30 April 2008
Spremenjeni zneski reprezentativnih cen in dodatnih uvoznih dajatev za beli sladkor, surovi sladkor in proizvode pod oznako KN 17029095, ki se uporabljajo od 30. aprila 2008
Council Regulation (EC) No 388/2008
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 388/2008
of 29 April 2008
z dne 29 aprila 2008
extending the definitive anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of the same product consigned from the Macao SAR, whether declared as originating in the Macao SAR or not
o razširitvi dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov, uvedenih z Uredbo (ES) št. 1472/2006 na uvoz določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz enakega izdelka, poslanega iz Posebne upravne regije Macao, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Posebne upravne regije Macao ali ne
By Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 [2], (the ‘original Regulation’), the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping duties ranging from 9,7 to 16,5 % on imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘the original investigation’).
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1472/2006 [2] („prvotna uredba“) je Svet uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve v razponu od 9,7 % do 16,5 % na uvoz obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („prvotna preiskava“).
Ex-Officio Initiation
Začetek po službeni dolžnosti
In accordance with recital (325) of the original Regulation, the Commission carried out monitoring of imports in order to identify any changes in the pattern of trade which could indicate circumvention of the measures.
Komisija je v skladu z uvodno izjavo (325) prvotne uredbe izvajala spremljanje uvoza, da bi ugotovila spremembe vzorca trgovanja, ki bi pokazale izogibanje ukrepom.
The evidence at the disposal of the Commission indicated that since the imposition of the anti-dumping measures, there had been a change in the pattern of trade, based on transhipment and/or assembly practices, for which there was insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the anti-dumping measures.
Dokazi, ki so bili na voljo Komisiji, so pokazali, da je po uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov prišlo do spremembe vzorca trgovanja na podlagi pretovarjanja in/ali sestavljanja izdelka, za katere ni bilo zadostnih ustreznih razlogov ali ekonomske upravičenosti, razen uvedbe protidampinških ukrepov.
In addition, the evidence showed that the remedial effects of the existing anti-dumping measures on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the PRC were being undermined both in terms of quantity and price.
Poleg tega so dokazi pokazali, da so bili popravljalni učinki obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov na uvoz določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske oslabljeni v smislu količine in cene.
Finally, the evidence indicated that the prices of certain footwear with uppers of leather consigned from the Macao SAR were dumped in relation to the normal value established for the like product during the original investigation.
Nenazadnje so dokazi pokazali, da so bile cene določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja, odpremljene iz Posebne upravne regije Macao, dampinške glede na normalno vrednost, določeno za podoben izdelek med prvotno preiskavo.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient prima facie evidence existed for the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Article 13 of the basic Regulation, the Commission published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a Regulation of Initiation [3] (the ‘initiating Regulation’) on an ex-officio basis to investigate the alleged circumvention of the anti-dumping measures.
Komisija je po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni prima facie dokazi za začetek preiskave na podlagi člena 13 osnovne uredbe, zato je v Uradnem listu Evropske unije po uradni dolžnosti objavila Uredbo o začetku [3] („začetna uredba“) za preiskavo domnevnega izogibanja protidampinškim ukrepom.
The Commission, by means of the initiating Regulation and Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation, also instructed the customs authorities to register imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather consigned from the Macao SAR whether declared as originating in the Macao SAR or not, as from 7 September 2007.
Komisija je z začetno uredbo in členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe dala tudi navodila carinskim organom, naj od 7. septembra 2007 dalje registrirajo uvoz določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja, poslane iz Posebne upravne regije Macao, ne glede na to, ali je deklarirana kot izdelek s poreklom iz Posebne upravne regije Macao ali ne.
The Commission officially advised the authorities of the Macao SAR and the PRC and known manufacturers/exporters in the Macao SAR and the PRC, the importers in the Community known to be concerned and producers of certain footwear with uppers of leather in the Community of the initiation of the investigation.
Komisija je o začetku preiskave uradno obvestila organe Posebne upravne regije Macao in Ljudske republike Kitajske ter znane proizvajalce/izvoznike v Posebni upravni regiji Macao in Ljudski republiki Kitajski, uvoznike v Skupnosti, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter proizvajalce določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja v Skupnosti.
Questionnaires were sent to the exporters/manufacturers in the Macao SAR, to the exporters/producers in the PRC and to the importers in the Community which were known to the Commission from the original investigation and which had made themselves known within the deadlines specified in Article 3 of the initiating Regulation.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani izvoznikom/proizvajalcem v Posebni upravni regiji Macao, izvoznikom/proizvajalcem v Ljudski republiki Kitajski in uvoznikom v Skupnosti, ki jih je Komisija poznala iz prvotne preiskave ali ki so se ji javili v rokih, določenih v členu 3 začetne uredbe.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the initiating Regulation.
Zainteresiranim stranem je bila dana možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo Komisijo za zaslišanje v roku, določenem v začetni uredbi.
Eight manufacturers/exporters in the Macao SAR submitted questionnaire replies.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike je poslalo osem proizvajalcev/izvoznikov v Posebni upravni regiji Macao.
Replies to questionnaires were also submitted by 16 unrelated importers in the Community.
Prav tako je izpolnjene vprašalnike poslalo 16 nepovezanih uvoznikov v Skupnosti.
Other importers also made themselves known but did not complete questionnaire responses.
Javili so se tudi drugi uvozniki, vendar niso izpolnili vprašalnika.
The following companies cooperated in the investigation and submitted replies to the questionnaires:
Naslednje gospodarske družbe so sodelovale v preiskavi in predložile izpolnjene vprašalnike:
Macanese manufacturers/exporters:
Macajski proizvajalci/izvozniki:
a+w shoes GmbH & Co. KG, Germany,
a+w shoes GmbH & Co. KG, Nemčija
Aasics Europe B.V., The Netherlands,
Aasics Europe B.V., Nizozemska
Aldo UK Ltd, UK,
Aldo UK Ltd, Združeno kraljestvo
Caprice Schuhproduktion GmbH & Co. KG, Germany,
Caprice Schuhproduktion GmbH & Co. KG, Nemčija
Eurohispana De Inversiones, S.A., Spain,
Eurohispana De Inversiones, S.A., Španija
Firma Handlowa ‘C.A.M.’, Poland,
Firma Handlowa „C.A.M.“, Poljska
Footex International B.V., The Netherlands,
Footex International B.V., Nizozemska
Heson International B.V., The Netherlands,
Heson International B.V., Nizozemska
Mexx Shoes B.V., The Netherlands,
Mexx Shoes B.V., Nizozemska
Orion Italiana GmbH & Co. KG, Germany,
Orion Italiana GmbH & Co. KG, Nemčija
PWH Originals International B.V., The Netherlands,
PWH Originals International B.V., Nizozemska
Shoe.com GmbH & Co. KG, Germany,
Shoe.com GmbH & Co. KG, Nemčija
Wendel GmbH & Co. KG, Germany,
Wendel GmbH & Co. KG, Nemčija
Wolverine Europe Ltd., UK,
Wolverine Europe Ltd., Združeno kraljestvo
Wolverine Europe B.V., The Netherlands,
Wolverine Europe B.V., Nizozemska
Wortman KG Internationale Schuproduktionen, Germany.
Wortman KG Internationale Schuproduktionen, Nemčija
In addition, twenty-seven producers/exporters in the PRC replied to mini-questionnaires regarding trade in footwear via Macao.
Poleg tega je 27 proizvajalcev/izvoznikov v Ljudski republiki Kitajski izpolnilo kratke vprašalnike o trgovanju z obutvijo prek Macaa.
By visiting seven companies, over 90 % of the production of the cooperating manufacturers was covered.
Z obiskom 7 družb je bilo zajete več kot 90 % proizvodnje sodelujočih proizvajalcev.
Where appropriate, verification visits were also carried out to traders in both the Macao SAR and the Hong Kong SAR which traded the product concerned for sale to the Community market.
Kadar je bilo to primerno, so bili preveritveni obiski izvedeni tudi pri trgovcih v Posebni upravni regiji Macao in Posebni upravni regiji Hongkong, ki so trgovali z zadevnim izdelkom za prodajo na trgu Skupnosti.
Such visits were limited to sales of the product concerned produced by the verified Macanese companies and the authorities of the Hong Kong SAR were informed of these visits.
Tovrstni obiski so bili omejeni na prodajo zadevnega izdelka, ki so ga proizvedle preverjene macajske družbe, organi Poseben upravne regije Hongkong pa so bili o teh obiskih obveščeni.
The product concerned by the possible circumvention is footwear with uppers of leather or composition leather, excluding sports footwear, footwear involving special technology, slippers and other indoor footwear and footwear with a protective toecap (‘certain footwear with uppers of leather’) originating in the People’s Republic of China, normally declared under CN codes 64032000, ex64035105, ex64035111, ex64035115, ex64035119, ex64035191, ex64035195, ex64035199, ex64035905, ex64035911, ex64035931, ex64035935, ex64035939, ex64035991, ex64035995, ex64035999, ex64039105, ex64039111, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039191, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039905, ex64039911, ex64039931, ex64039933, ex64039936, ex64039938, ex64039991, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998 and ex64051000 (the ‘product concerned’).
Izdelek, ki ga zadeva možno izogibanje, je obutev z zgornjim delom iz usnja ali umetnega usnja, razen športne obutve, obutve s posebno tehnologijo, copat in druge hišne obutve ter obutve z zaščitno kapico („določena obutev z zgornjim delom iz usnja“) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, običajno uvrščena pod oznake KN 64032000, ex64035105, ex64035111, ex64035115, ex64035119, ex64035191, ex64035195, ex64035199, ex64035905, ex64035911, ex64035931, ex64035935, ex64035939, ex64035991, ex64035995, ex64035999, ex64039105, ex64039111, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039191, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039905, ex64039911, ex64039931, ex64039933, ex64039936, ex64039938, ex64039991, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998 in ex64051000 („zadevni izdelek“).
The product under investigation is footwear with uppers of leather or composition leather, excluding sports footwear, footwear involving special technology, slippers and other indoor footwear and footwear with a protective toecap consigned from the Macao SAR (the ‘product under investigation’), whether declared as originating in Macao SAR or not, normally declared under the same CN codes as the product concerned.
Izdelek v preiskavi je obutev z zgornjim delom iz usnja ali umetnega usnja, razen športne obutve, obutve s posebno tehnologijo, copat in druge hišne obutve ter obutve z zaščitno kapico, odpremljena iz Posebne upravne regije Macao („izdelek v preiskavi“), ne glede na to, ali je deklarirana kot izdelek s poreklom iz Posebne upravne regije Macau ali ne, ki je običajno uvrščena pod istimi oznakami kot zadevni izdelek.
The investigation showed that footwear exported to the Community from the People’s Republic of China and those consigned from the Macao SAR to the Community have the same basic physical characteristics and have the same uses.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imata obutev, ki jo v Skupnost izvaža Ljudska republika Kitajska, in obutev, ki je v Skupnost odpremljena iz Posebne upravne regije Macao, enake osnovne fizikalne značilnosti in enako uporabo.
They are therefore to be considered as like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe obravnavata kot podobna izdelka.
The investigation period (the ‘IP’) covered the period from 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007.
Obdobje preiskave („OP“) je zajelo obdobje od 1. julija 2006 do 30. junija 2007.
Data was collected from 2004 up to the end of the IP to investigate the alleged change in the pattern of trade and the other aspects set out in Article 13 of the basic Regulation.
Podatki za preiskavo domnevne spremembe v vzorcu trgovanja in ostalih vidikov iz člena 13 osnovne uredbe so se zbirali od leta 2004 do konca OP.
All interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend:
Vse zainteresirane strani so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravalo priporočiti:
the extension of the definitive anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of the same product consigned from the Macao SAR;
razširitev dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov, uvedenih z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1472/2006 za uvoz določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz enakega izdelka, poslanega iz Posebne upravne regije Macao;
The oral and written comments submitted by the parties were considered and, where appropriate, the definitive findings were modified accordingly.
Po proučitvi ustnih in pisnih pripomb, ki so jih predložile strani, so bile dokončne ugotovitve po potrebi ustrezno spremenjene.
As mentioned above, the analysis of a change in the pattern of trade covered the period from 2004 up to the end of the IP.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, je analiza spremembe vzorca trgovanja zajela obdobje od leta 2004 do konca OP.
Data was collected and analysed on the basis of the enlarged Community market (‘EU27’) as at the date of the initiating Regulation.
Podatki so bili zbrani in analizirani na podlagi razširjenega trga Skupnosti („EU-27“) od datuma začetne uredbe.
However, it should be noted that the original measures were imposed on the PRC on the basis of calculations based on the Community market as it existed at that time (‘EU25’).
Treba pa je opozoriti, da so bili prvotni ukrepi za Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko uvedeni na podlagi izračunov, ki so temeljili na trgu Skupnosti, kakršen je obstajal v tistem času („EU-25“).
Bearing this in mind, the import levels into the two new Member States (Bulgaria and Romania) were analysed and it was clear that these accounted for only a very small percentage of total EU27 imports and that therefore the decision as to which EU market level (EU27 or EU25) should be used as a basis for analysis had no impact on the outcome of the conclusions reached.
Ob upoštevanju tega so bile analizirane ravni uvoza v dve novi državi članici (Bolgarijo in Romunijo) in bilo je jasno, da so te ravni predstavljale samo majhen delež celotnega uvoza v EU-27, zato odločitev, katero raven trga EU (EU-27 ali EU-25) je treba uporabiti kot podlago za analizo, ni vplivala na rezultat sklepnih ugotovitev.
As stated above in recital (6), eight exporters/manufacturers in the Macao SAR cooperated with the investigation by submitting questionnaire replies and all of those companies exported the product concerned to the Community during the IP either directly or indirectly via traders.
Kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (6) zgoraj, je osem izvoznikov/proizvajalcev iz Posebne upravne regije Macao sodelovalo v preiskavi in predložilo izpolnjene vprašalnike, vse te družbe pa so med OP izvažale zadevni izdelek v Skupnost, bodisi neposredno bodisi prek gospodarskih subjektov.
Based on information supplied by the Macanese authorities, it was clear that at least fifteen companies were manufacturing footwear in Macao at the initiation of the investigation.
Na podlagi informacij, ki so jih predložili macajski organi, je bilo jasno, da je na začetku preiskave najmanj 15 družb proizvajalo obutev v Macau.
However, the largest manufacturer, which amounted for around 50 % of exports to the Community, did not cooperate and therefore cooperation levels were determined to be below 50 %.
Vendar pa največji proizvajalec, ki je predstavljal okrog 50 % izvoza v Skupnost, ni sodeloval in zato so bile ravni sodelovanja določene kot nižje od 50 %.
Furthermore, only twenty-seven exporting producers replied to the Commission’s mini-questionnaire for producer/exporters in the PRC.
Poleg tega je samo 27 proizvajalcev izvoznikov izpolnilo kratki vprašalnik Komisije za proizvajalce/izvoznike v Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko.
During the original investigation it was clear that the number of producers in the PRC was many hundreds.
Med prvotno preiskavo je bilo jasno, da je bilo proizvajalcev v Ljudski republiki Kitajski več sto.
None of the twenty-seven respondents stated that they exported to the Community market via Macao.
Nobeden izmed 27 vprašancev ni navedel, da izvaža na trg Skupnosti prek Macaa.
As it was clear that the cooperation level for both the Macao SAR and the PRC was not high, the determination of the import volume had to be obtained via statistical sources.
Ker je bilo jasno, da raven sodelovanja za Posebno upravno regijo Macao in Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko ni bila visoka, je bilo treba določiti obseg uvoza s statističnimi viri.
This data was cross-checked and confirmed by other statistical sources available to the Commission.
Ti podatki so bili navzkrižno preverjeni in potrjeni z drugimi statističnimi viri, ki so bili na voljo Komisiji.
This approach was further confirmed by other information received during the investigation which indicated the existence of a number of other non-cooperating exporters/manufacturers in the Macao SAR and the PRC which exported the product concerned to the Community during the IP.
Ta pristop je bil nadalje potrjen z drugimi informacijami, prejetimi med preiskavo, ki so pokazale obstoj številnih drugih nesodelujočih izvoznikov/proizvajalcev v Posebni upravni regiji Macao in Ljudski republiki Kitajski, ki so med OP izvažali zadevni izdelek v Skupnost.
In accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the assessment of the existence of circumvention was done by analysing whether there was a change in the pattern of trade between third countries and the Community, whether that change stemmed from a practice, process or work for which there was insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the duty, whether there was evidence of injury or that the remedial effects of the duty were being undermined in terms of the prices and/or quantities of the like product, and whether there was evidence of dumping in relation to the normal values previously established for the like product, if necessary in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 13(1) osnovne uredbe je bilo izogibanje ocenjeno s proučevanjem, ali se je spremenil vzorec trgovanja med tretjimi državami in Skupnostjo, ali je ta sprememba nastala zaradi prakse, postopka ali dela, za katere ni bilo zadostnega ustreznega razloga ali ekonomske upravičenosti, razen uvedbe dajatve, ali obstajajo dokazi o škodi ali slabitvi popravljalnega učinka dajatve v smislu cen in/ali količin podobnega izdelka in ali so dokazi o dampingu v zvezi z normalnimi vrednostmi, ki so bile pred tem določene za podoben izdelek, po potrebi v skladu z določbami člena 2 osnovne uredbe.
The practice, process or work referred to above includes, inter alia, the consignment of the product subject to measures via the Macao SAR and the assembly of parts by an assembly operation in the Macao SAR.
Zgoraj navedena praksa, postopek ali delo med drugim vključujejo odpremo izdelka, ki je predmet ukrepov, prek Posebne upravne regije Macao ter sestavljanje delov z dejavnostjo sestavljanja v Posebni upravni regiji Macao.
For this purpose, the existence of assembly operations was determined in accordance with Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation.
V ta namen je bil obstoj dejavnosti sestavljanja izdelka določen v skladu s členom 13(2) osnovne uredbe.
In this regard, it is noted that eight manufacturing companies in Macao submitted questionnaire responses.
V zvezi s tem se opozarja, da je osem proizvajalcev v Macau predložilo izpolnjene vprašalnike.
The seven largest manufacturers were checked on the spot and all eight responses were used as a basis for the calculation of the following aspects of the investigation mentioned at Article 13 of the basic Regulation:
Sedem največjih proizvajalcev je bilo preverjenih na kraju samem in vseh osem izpolnjenih vprašalnikov je bilo uporabljenih za osnovo izračuna naslednjih vidikov preiskave iz člena 13 osnovne uredbe:
the value of the parts used in the assembly operations;
vrednost uporabljenih delov pri sestavljanju izdelka;
the value added in terms of cost of manufacturing (COM);
dodana vrednost v smislu proizvodnih stroškov;
dumping using the normal value from the previous investigation;
damping z uporabo normalne vrednosti iz prejšnje preiskave;
the determination of when the companies started manufacturing, or whether operations substantially increased, since the imposition of measures;
določitev, kdaj so družbe začele s proizvodnjo, ali če se je njihovo delovanje od uvedbe ukrepov znatno povečalo;
the assessment of whether the imported products had, in terms of quantities and/or prices, undermined the remedial effects of the measures in force.
ocena, ali so uvoženi izdelki v smislu količin in/ali cen oslabili popravljalne učinke veljavnih ukrepov;
As regards (a) and (b) above, cost information from the Macanese manufacturers including their purchases from Chinese suppliers was used.
V zvezi z zgornjima točkama a) in b) so bili uporabljene informacije o stroških macajskih proizvajalcev, vključno z njihovimi nakupi od kitajskih dobaviteljev.