natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In view of the magnitude of the dumping margin found and given the level of the injury caused to the Community industry, it is considered necessary that the amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duty imposed by the provisional Regulation should be definitively collected to the extent of the amount of definitive duties imposed.
Glede na obseg ugotovljene stopnje dampinga in glede na raven škode, povzročene industriji Skupnosti, se zdi nujno, da se zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo, ki jo je uvedla začasna uredba, dokončno pobirajo v obsegu višine uvedenih dokončnih dajatev.
As the definitive duty is lower than the provisional duty, amounts provisionally secured in excess of the definitive rate of anti-dumping duty should be released,
Ker je dokončna dajatev nižja od začasne dajatve, se zneski, ki so začasno zavarovani in presegajo dokončno stopnjo protidampinške dajatve, sprostijo –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of coke of coal in pieces larger than 80 mm in maximum diameter (Coke 80+) falling within CN code ex27040019 (TARIC code 2704001910) and originating in the People’s Republic of China.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz koksa iz premoga v kosih s premerom več kot 80 mm (koks 80+) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, uvrščenega pod oznako KN ex27040019 (oznaka TARIC 2704001910).
The amount of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable for products described in paragraph 1 shall be the difference between the minimum import price of EUR 197 per tonne and the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, in all cases where the latter is less than the minimum import price.
Znesek dokončne protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za izdelke iz odstavka 1, je razlika med minimalno uvozno ceno 197 EUR za tono in neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti pred plačilom dajatve v vseh primerih, ko je slednja nižja od minimalne uvozne cene.
The anti-dumping duty shall also apply, pro rata, to coke of coal in pieces with a diameter of more than 80 mm when shipped in mixtures containing both coke of coal in pieces with a diameter of more than 80 mm and coke of coal in pieces with smaller diameters unless it is determined that the quantity of coke of coal in pieces with a diameter of more than 80 mm does not constitute more than 20 % of dry net weight of the mixed shipment.
Protidampinška dajatev se sorazmerno uporablja tudi za koks iz premoga v kosih s premerom več kot 80 mm, kadar je odpremljen v mešanicah, ki vsebujejo koks iz premoga v kosih s premerom več kot 80 mm in koks iz premoga v kosih z manjšim premerom, razen če je določeno, da količina koksa iz premoga v kosih s premerom več kot 80 mm ne predstavlja več kot 20 % neto suhe teže mešane pošiljke.
The quantity of coke of coal in pieces with a diameter of more than 80 mm contained in mixtures may be determined in accordance with Articles 68 to 70 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code [5] wherein, inter alia, it is stated that the customs authorities may require the declarant to present other documents for the purpose of verifying the accuracy of the particulars contained in the declaration and to examine the goods and take samples for analysis or for detailed examination.
Količina koksa iz premoga v kosih s premerom več kot 80 mm v mešanicah se lahko določi v skladu s členi 68 do 70 Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 z dne 12. oktobra 1992 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [5], kjer je med drugim navedeno, da lahko carinski organi od deklaranta zahtevajo, da predloži druge dokumente za namene preverjanja točnosti navedb v deklaraciji, in pregledajo blago ter vzamejo vzorce blaga zaradi analize ali podrobnega preverjanja.
In cases where the quantity of coke of coal in pieces with a diameter of more than 80 mm is determined on the basis of samples, the samples shall be selected in accordance with the norm ISO 18238:2006.
Kadar se količina koksa iz premoga v kosih s premerom več kot 80 mm določi na podlagi vzorcev, se vzorci izberejo v skladu s standardom ISO 18238:2006.
In cases where goods have been damaged before entry into free circulation and, therefore, the price actually paid or payable is apportioned for the determination of the customs value pursuant to Article 145 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code [6], the minimum import price set out above shall be reduced by a percentage which corresponds to the apportioning of the price actually paid or payable.
Če je bilo blago poškodovano pred vstopom v prosti promet in je torej dejansko plačana ali plačljiva cena porazdeljena za določitev carinske vrednosti v skladu s členom 145 Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 dne 2. julija 1993 o določbah za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [6], se zgoraj določena minimalna uvozna cena zmanjša za odstotek, ki ustreza porazdelitvi dejansko plačane ali plačljive cene.
Amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1071/2007 on imports of coke of coal in pieces larger than 80 mm in maximum diameter (Coke 80+) originating in the People’s Republic of China shall be definitively collected at the rate of the definitive duty imposed pursuant to Article 1.
Zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo po Uredbi (ES) št. 1071/2007 o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz koksa iz premoga v kosih s premerom več kot 80 mm (koks 80+) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, se dokončno poberejo po stopnji dokončne dajatve, ki jo nalaga člen 1.
The amounts secured in excess of the amount of the definitive duty shall be released.
Zavarovani zneski, ki presegajo višino dokončne dajatve, se sprostijo.
OJ L 244, 19.9.2007, p. 3.
UL L 244, 19.9.2007, str. 3.
For confidentiality reasons, this figure is given only in ranges.
Zaradi zaupnosti je ta podatek naveden le v razponu.
(1000 EUR)
(v 1000 EUR)
Council Regulation (EC) No 240/2008
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 240/2008
repealing the anti-dumping duty on imports of urea originating in Belarus, Croatia, Libya and Ukraine, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96
o razveljavitvi protidampinške dajatve na uvoz sečnine s poreklom iz Belorusije, Hrvaške, Libije in Ukrajine po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96
Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije in po posvetovanju s Posvetovalnim odborom,
In January 2002, by Regulation (EC) No 92/2002 [2], the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping duties ranging from EUR 7,81 to EUR 16,84 per tonne on imports of urea, whether or not in aqueous solution, originating in Belarus, Croatia, Libya and Ukraine.
Svet je januarja 2002 z Uredbo (ES) št. 92/2002 [2] uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve od 7,81 EUR do 16,84 EUR na tono za uvoz sečnine, v vodni raztopini ali ne, s poreklom iz Belorusije, Hrvaške, Libije in Ukrajine.
By the same Regulation, definitive anti-dumping duties ranging from EUR 6,18 to EUR 21,43 per tonne were imposed on imports of urea originating in Estonia, Lithuania, Bulgaria and Romania and were automatically repealed on 1 May 2004 and 1 January 2007 respectively, the date of accession of these countries to the Community.
Z isto uredbo so bile uvedene tudi dokončne protidampinške dajatve od 6,18 EUR do 21,43 EUR na tono za uvoz sečnine s poreklom iz Estonije, Litve, Bolgarije in Romunije. Dajatve so bile 1. maja 2004 (za Estonijo in Litvo) in 1. januarja 2007 (za Bolgarijo in Romunijo) avtomatično razveljavljene, in sicer ob vstopu teh držav v Skupnost.
In April 2006, the Commission published a notice of impending expiry of the existing measures [3].
Komisija je aprila 2006 objavila obvestilo o bližnjem izteku veljavnosti obstoječih ukrepov [3].
On 17 October 2006 the Commission received a request for an expiry review of these measures pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je 17. oktobra 2006 prejela zahtevo za pregled zaradi izteka teh ukrepov skladno s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
This request was lodged by the European Fertiliser Manufactures Association (EFMA) (the applicant) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50 %, of the total Community production of urea.
To zahtevo je vložilo Evropsko združenje proizvajalcev umetnih gnojil (EFMA) („vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje sečnine v Skupnosti.
The applicant alleged, and provided sufficient prima facie evidence for its allegation, that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury to the Community industry with regard to imports of urea originating in Belarus, Croatia, Libya and Ukraine (the countries concerned).
Vložnik je navedel in predložil zadostne dokaze prima facie o tem, da bo iztek ukrepov v zvezi z uvozom sečnine s poreklom iz Belorusije, Hrvaške, Libije in Ukrajine (v nadaljevanju „zadevne države“) verjetno privedel do nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga in škode za industrijo Skupnosti.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission initiated this review by publishing a notice of initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union [4].
Ker je po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom Komisija ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov na podlagi člena 11(2) osnovne uredbe, je v Uradnem listu Evropske unije objavila obvestilo o njegovem začetku [4].
Investigations concerning other countries
Preiskave v zvezi z drugimi državami
In May 2006, the Commission initiated a review [5] of the definitive anti-dumping duties imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 901/2001 [6] on imports of urea originating in Russia pursuant to Article 11(2) and (3) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je maja 2006 začela pregled [5] dokončnih protidampinških dajatev, uvedenih z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 901/2001 [6] za uvoz sečnine s poreklom iz Rusije v skladu s členom 11(2) in (3) osnovne uredbe.
As a result of this review, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 907/2007 [7] repealed the anti-dumping duties on imports of urea originating in Russia.
Po tem pregledu je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 907/2007 [7] razveljavil protidampinške dajatve za uvoz sečnine s poreklom iz Rusije.
It was concluded that there was no continuation of material injury to the Community industry and that there was no likelihood of recurrence of injury thereto in the absence of measures.
Sklenjeno je bilo, da ni nadaljevanja znatne škode za industrijo Skupnosti in da brez ukrepov ni verjetnosti ponovnega pojava škode zanjo.
The investigation of continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 October 2005 to 30 September 2006 (RIP).
Preiskava glede nadaljevanja ali ponovnega pojava dampinga in škode je potekala od 1. oktobra 2005 do 30. septembra 2006 („OPP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of a likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 2002 up to the end of the RIP (period considered).
Proučitev trendov, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovnega pojava škode, je zajemalo obdobje od leta 2002 do konca OPP („obravnavano obdobje“).
The Commission officially advised the applicant, the Community producers, the exporting producers in Belarus, Croatia, Libya and Ukraine (hereinafter the exporters concerned), the importers, traders, users and their associations known to be concerned, as well as the representatives of the government of the exporting countries, of the initiation of the review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda uradno obvestila vložnika, proizvajalce Skupnosti, proizvajalce izvoznike v Belorusiji, na Hrvaškem, v Libiji in Ukrajini (v nadaljevanju „zadevni izvozniki“), uvoznike, trgovce, uporabnike in njihova združenja, za katera je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter predstavnike vlade držav izvoznic.
The Commission sent questionnaires to all these parties and to those who made themselves known within the time limit set in the notice of initiation.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike vsem tem strankam in vsem, ki so se prijavili v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku pregleda.
The Commission also gave the parties directly concerned the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation.
Komisija je dala vsem neposredno zadevnim strankam tudi možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo za zaslišanje v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku.
In view of the apparently large number of Community producers, importers in the Community and exporting producers in the Ukraine, it was considered appropriate, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation, to examine whether sampling should be used.
Glede na zelo veliko število proizvajalcev Skupnosti, uvoznikov v Skupnosti in proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Ukrajini je bilo primerno, da se v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe prouči, ali je treba uporabiti vzorčenje.
With regard to importers into the Community, very low cooperation was obtained as only one importer expressed its willingness to cooperate.
Uvozniki v Skupnost so ponudili zelo malo sodelovanja, saj je pripravljenost za sodelovanje izrazil le en uvoznik.
Twelve Community producers properly completed the sampling form and formally agreed to cooperate further in the investigation.
Dvanajst proizvajalcev Skupnosti je pravilno izpolnilo obrazec za vzorčenje in se uradno strinjalo, da bodo še naprej sodelovali v preiskavi.
Four out of these 12 companies, which were found to be representative of the Community industry in terms of volume of production and sales of urea in the Community, were selected for the sample.
Štiri od teh dvanajstih družb, za katere se je ugotovilo, da predstavljajo industrijo Skupnosti glede na obseg proizvodnje in prodaje sečnine v Skupnosti, so bile izbrane v vzorec.
The four sampled Community producers accounted for around 60 % of the total production of the Community industry during the RIP, whilst the above 12 Community producers represented around 80 % of the production in the Community.
Štirje vzorčeni proizvajalci Skupnosti so med OPP predstavljali približno 60 % celotne proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti, dvanajst zgoraj navedenih proizvajalcev Skupnosti pa približno 80 % celotne proizvodnje Skupnosti.
Four exporting producers in Ukraine properly completed the sampling form within the deadline and formally agreed to cooperate further in the investigation.
Štirje ukrajinski proizvajalci izvozniki so obrazec za vzorčenje pravilno izpolnili v roku in se uradno strinjali, da bodo pri preiskavi še naprej sodelovali.
These four exporting producers accounted for almost 100 % of the total exports from Ukraine to the Community during the RIP.
Ti štirje proizvajalci izvozniki so predstavljali skoraj 100 % skupnega ukrajinskega izvoza v Skupnost med OPP.
Due to the low number of cooperating companies in Ukraine, it was decided not to apply sampling, and all companies were invited to submit a questionnaire.
Zaradi majhnega števila sodelujočih družb v Ukrajini je bilo odločeno, da se vzorčenje ne bo uporabilo, vse družbe pa so bile pozvane k predložitvi vprašalnika.
Replies to the questionnaires were received from four Community producers, one importer, two users, and four exporting producers in Ukraine and one each in Belarus, Croatia and Libya.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike so predložili štirje proizvajalci Skupnosti, en uvoznik, dva uporabnika ter štirje ukrajinski proizvajalci izvozniki in po eden iz Belorusije, Hrvaške in Libije.
In addition, several importers and users and their associations submitted comments without replying to the questionnaire.
Poleg tega je svoje pripombe predložilo več uvoznikov in uporabnikov ter njihovih združenj, ne da bi izpolnili vprašalnik.
Fertiberia SA, Madrid, Spain,
Fertiberia S.A., Madrid, Španija,
Yara Group (Yara Spa Ferrara, Italy and Yara Sluiskil BV, Sluiskil, the Netherlands),
Yara Group (Yara Spa Ferrara, Italija, in Yara Sluiskil B.V., Sluiskil, Nizozemska),
Zakłady Azotowe Puławy SA, Puławy, Poland;
Zakłady Azotowe Puławy S.A., Puławy, Poljska;
Exporting producers:
Proizvajalci izvozniki:
Close Joint Stock Company Severodonetsk, Severodonetsk,
zaprta delniška družba Severodonetsk, Severodonetsk,
Joint Stock Company Dnipro Azot, Dneprodzerzhinsk,
delniška družba Dnipro Azot, Dneprodzerzhinsk,
Open Joint Stock Company Cherkassy Azot, Cherkassy;
odprta delniška družba Cherkassy Azot, Cherkassy;
Croatia:
Hrvaška:
Community importers:
Uvozniki v Skupnost:
Dynea Austria GmbH, Krems, Austria;
Dynea Austria GmbH, Krems, Avstrija;
Community users:
Uporabniki v Skupnosti:
Associazione Liberi Agricoltori Cremonesi, Cremona, Italy,
Associazione Liberi Agricoltori Cremonesi, Cremona, Italija,
Acefer, Asociación Comercial Española de Fertilizantes, Madrid, Spain.
Acefer, Asociación Comercial Española de Fertilizantes, Madrid, Španija.
The product concerned is the same as determined in the original investigation, namely, urea currently classifiable within CN codes 31021010 and 31021090 (the product concerned) and originating in Belarus, Croatia, Libya and Ukraine.
Zadevni izdelek je isti kot v prvotni preiskavi, tj. sečnina, ki je trenutno uvrščena pod oznaki KN 31021010 in 31021090 („zadevni izdelek“), s poreklom iz Belorusije, Hrvaške, Libije in Ukrajine.
Agricultural grade urea can be used either as a fertiliser, which is spread on to the soil, or as an animal feed additive.
Sečnina za kmetijske namene se lahko uporablja kot gnojilo, ki se raztrese po zemlji, ali kot dodatek v krmi za živali.
Liquid urea can be used both as a fertiliser and for industrial purposes.
Sečnina v tekoči obliki se lahko uporablja kot gnojilo in tudi za industrijske namene.
As established in the original investigation, this review investigation has confirmed that the products manufactured and exported by the exporting producers in Belarus, Croatia, Libya and Ukraine, those manufactured and sold on the domestic market of these countries, as well as those manufactured and sold by the Community producers on the Community market all have the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and essentially the same uses.
Kot je bilo ugotovljeno v prvotni preiskavi, je ta preiskava v zvezi s pregledom potrdila, da imajo izdelki, ki jih proizvedejo in izvozijo proizvajalci izvozniki v Belorusiji, na Hrvaškem, v Libiji in Ukrajini, izdelki, proizvedeni in prodajani na domačem trgu teh držav, ter izdelki, ki jih proizvedejo in prodajo proizvajalci Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti, enake osnovne fizikalne, kemijske in tehnične lastnosti ter v glavnem enako uporabo.
Given the conclusions reached regarding likelihood of continuation or recurrence of injury, only the core arguments regarding likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping are developed below.
Glede na sklepne ugotovitve v zvezi z verjetnostjo nadaljevanja ali ponovnega pojava škode so spodaj navedeni le glavni argumenti v zvezi z nadaljevanjem ali ponovitvijo dampinga.
Dumping of imports during the review investigation period
Damping uvoza med obdobjem preiskave v zvezi s pregledom
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether dumping was taking place during the RIP and, if so, whether or not the expiry of the measures would be likely to lead to a continuation of dumping.
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe se je proučilo, ali je damping obstajal med OPP in ali je v tem primeru verjetno, da bi iztek ukrepov povzročil nadaljevanje dampinga.
In case of the three export countries with market-economy status, namely Croatia, Libya and Ukraine, normal value was determined in accordance with Article 2(1) to (3) of the basic Regulation.
Pri treh državah izvoznicah s statusom tržnega gospodarstva, in sicer Hrvaški, Libiji in Ukrajini, je bila normalna vrednost določena v skladu s členi 2(1) do (3) osnovne uredbe.
In case of Belarus, normal value was established according to Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation.
Pri Belorusiji je bila normalna vrednost določena v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe.
The dumping margin for the sole exporting producer in Croatia was established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with a weighted average export price, in accordance with Article 2(5), (11) and (12) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členi 2(5), 2(11) in 2(12) osnovne uredbe je bila za edinega hrvaškega proizvajalca izvoznika stopnja dampinga določena na podlagi primerjave med tehtano povprečno normalno vrednostjo in tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno.
Croatia exported more than 200000 tonnes of urea to the Community during the RIP, capturing 2,3 % of the Community market.
Hrvaška je v Skupnost med OPP izvozila več kot 200000 ton sečnine, kar predstavlja 2,3 % trga Skupnosti.
The sole known and cooperating exporting producer was still found to export at significantly dumped prices to the Community, as far as the RIP is concerned.
V zvezi z edinim znanim in sodelujočim proizvajalcem izvoznikom je bilo ugotovljeno, da je med OPP v Skupnost izvažal po znatno dampinških cenah.
The dumping margin found exceeded 20 %.
Ugotovljena stopnja dampinga je presegala 20 %.
There were significant doubts as to whether the costs for gas, which is the major input to produce urea, were reasonably reflected in the records of the exporting producer.
V zvezi s tem, ali so stroški plina, ki je glavna surovina pri proizvodnji sečnine, razumno prikazani v računovodskih evidencah proizvajalca izvoznika, je obstajal precejšen dvom.
Indeed, it was found that gas was sourced under particular conditions, determined by the fact that both the exporting producer and the gas supplier are majority-owned by the Croatian state and that gas prices were abnormally low.
Dejansko je bilo ugotovljeno, da je plin dobavljen pod posebnimi pogoji, na katere vpliva dejstvo, da je večinska lastnica proizvajalca izvoznika in dobavitelja plina država Hrvaška in da so bile cene plina neobičajno nizke.
In the absence of any undistorted gas prices relating to the Croatian domestic market, and in accordance with Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation, gas prices would have to be established on ‘any other reasonable basis, including information from other representative markets’.
Ker na hrvaškem domačem trgu ni neizkrivljenih cen plina, bi bilo treba cene plina v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe določiti na „kateri koli drugi ustrezni podlagi, vključno z informacijami z drugih reprezentativnih trgov“.
As the majority of the gas used for manufacturing the product concerned is of Russian origin, the adjusted price could be based on the average price of Russian gas when sold for export at the German/Czech border (Waidhaus), net of transport costs, Waidhaus being the main hub for Russian gas sales to the EU.
Ker je večina plina, uporabljenega pri proizvodnji zadevnega izdelka, ruskega porekla, je mogoče prilagojeno ceno osnovati na povprečni ceni ruskega plina, ki se izvaža na nemško/češki meji (Waidhaus), in neto stroških prevoza. Waidhaus je glavno vozlišče za izvoz ruskega plina v EU.
This would increase the dumping margin significantly.
To bi stopnjo dampinga znatno zvišalo.
Given the fact that dumping exists without this adjustment, and the conclusions on likelihood of recurrence of injury set out below, this matter was not pursued.
Glede na dejstvo, da damping obstaja brez te prilagoditve, ter glede na spodnje sklepne ugotovitve v zvezi z verjetnostjo ponovnega pojava škode ta zadeva ni bila več obravnavana.
Belarus, Libya and Ukraine
Belorusija, Libija in Ukrajina