natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In case of a loan granted to a company judged positively by a pool of banks and with good economic perspectives, undergoing a thorough process of modernisation, the annual rate of 0,40 % reflects, as stated by the Italian authorities, the market rate applicable to this type of operation.
V primeru posojila, odobrenega družbi, ki so ga banke ocenile pozitivno in je bilo gospodarsko perspektivno ter v postopku temeljite posodobitve, izraža letna stopnja 0,40 % po navedbah italijanskih organov tržno stopnjo, uporabno za to vrsto postopka.
The guarantee is linked to an underlying operation (investments), which is part-financed by the State through Law No 252/91 and therefore in line with State aid rules.
Garancija je povezana z osnovnim postopkom (naložbami), ki ga država delno financira v okviru Zakona št. 252/91 in je zato v skladu s pravili o državni pomoči.
On the basis of the foregoing information, the Commission can conclude that the guarantee provided by Finagra does not constitute State aid under Article 87(1) of the Treaty.
Na podlagi navedenih informacij Komisija ugotavlja, da garancija Finagre ni državna pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
The Commission finds that Italy has unlawfully implemented the aid in question contrary to Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je Italija nezakonito izvajala zadevno pomoč v nasprotju s členom 88(3) Pogodbe.
However, from all the foregoing considerations, it is clear that:
Vendar je na podlagi navedenih ugotovitev jasno, da:
the aid measures provided for by Article 15(16) of Law No 67/88, Article 5 of Law No 290/99 and Law No 252/91 (integrated projects) are compatible with the common market within the meaning of Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty,
so ukrepi pomoči iz člena 15(16) Zakona št. 67/88, člena 5 Zakona št. 290/99 in Zakona št. 252/91 (integrirani projekti) združljivi s skupnim trgom v smislu člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe,
the measures provided for by Article 4 of Law No 290/99 (namely: the operating, improvement and agricultural loans due on 31 March 1998 were never implemented and, therefore, did not amount to State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty,
ukrepi iz člena 4 Zakona št. 290/99 (in sicer posojila za poslovanje, izboljšave in kmetijstvo, ki so zapadla 31. marca 1998) niso bili nikoli izvedeni in zato niso državna pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe,
the interventions of Finagra, under Law No 252/91 relating to the acquisition of shareholdings, the granting of loans to cooperatives and the provisions of guarantees did not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty,
ukrepi Finagre v skladu z Zakonom št. 252/91 v zvezi s pridobitvijo deležev, odobritvijo posojil zadrugam in zagotavljanjem garancij niso državna pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe,
the interventions of Finagra under Law No 252/91 relating to the granting of loans to private companies were State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty.
so bili ukrepi Finagre v skladu z Zakonom št. 252/91 v zvezi z odobritvijo posojil podjetjem v zasebni lasti državna pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe.
They are compatible with the common market within the meaning of Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty,
Ukrepi so združljivi s skupnim trgom v smislu člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe –
The State aid which Italy implemented in favour of the meat sector, provided for by Article 15(16) of Law No 67/88, Article 5 of Law No 290/99 and Law No 252/91 (integrated projects) and Finagra's interventions under Law No 252/91 relating to the granting of loans to private companies are compatible with the common market within the meaning of Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty.
Državna pomoč iz člena 15(16) Zakona št. 67/88, člena 5 Zakona št. 290/99 in Zakona št. 252/91 (integrirani projekti), ki jo je Italija dodelila v korist sektorja za meso, ter ukrepi Finagre v skladu z Zakonom št. 252/91 v zvezi z odobritvijo posojil podjetjem v zasebni lasti so združljivi s skupnim trgom v smislu člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe.
The measures provided for in Article 4 of Law No 290/99 concerning the operating, improvement and agricultural loans due on 31 March 1998 were never implemented and did not result, therefore, in State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty.
Ukrepi iz člena 4 Zakona št. 290/99, ki zadevajo posojila za poslovanje, izboljšave in kmetijstvo, ki so zapadla 31. marca 1998, niso bili nikoli izvedeni in zato niso državna pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe.
The interventions of Finagra, under Law No 252/91 relating to the acquisition of shareholdings, the granting of loans to cooperatives and the provisions of guarantees did not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty.
Ukrepi Finagre v skladu z Zakonom št. 252/91 v zvezi s pridobitvijo deležev, odobritvijo posojil zadrugam in zagotavljanjem garancij niso državna pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe.
OJ C 148, 27.5.2000, p. 2.
UL C 148, 27.5.2000, str. 2.
Commission Decision SG (2002) D/229239 of 5 April 2002.
Odločba Komisije SG(2002) D/229239 z dne 5. aprila 2002.
Over the 1970 to 1990 period France managed to reduce the number of its slaughtering plants from 1738 to 357.
V obdobju 1970-1990 je Franciji uspelo zmanjšati število obratov za zakol s 1738 na 357.
On the other hand, in the early 1990s, there were still 8500 operational slaughtering plants in Italy as against the already mentioned 357 units in France, 270 in Germany and 30 in the Netherlands.
Na drugi strani je bilo na začetku devetdesetih let 20. stoletja v Italiji še vedno 8500 delujočih obratov za zakol v primerjavi z že omenjenimi 357 enotami v Franciji, 270 v Nemčiji in 30 na Nizozemskem.
The amount of ITL 700 billion is made up of ITL 400 billion for 1988 and ITL 300 billion for 1989.
Znesek 700 milijard ITL je vsota zneska 400 milijard ITL za leto 1988 in 300 milijard ITL za leto 1989.
Letter SG (2002) D/229239).
Dopis SG(2002) D/229239.
For the purposes of the Commission's assessment, that is the Commission reference rate for Italy at the time of the loan.
Da lahko Komisija to oceni, pomeni to referenčno mero Komisije, ki velja za Italijo v času posojila.
See Commission letter of 28 January 1999.
Glej dopis Komisije z dne 28. januarja 1999.
In 2000, 1154000 t of bovine animals and calves were slaughtered in Italy.
Leta 2000 je bilo v Italiji zaklanih 1154000 ton goveda in telet.
In the same period in EU 7401000 t of animals were slaughtered.
V istem obdobju je bilo v EU zaklanih 7401000 ton živali.
See letter of the Italian authorities of 18 May 2000.
Glej dopis italijanskih organov z dne 18. maja 2000.
OJ C 232, 12.8.2000, pp. 17 to 41.
UL L 232, 12.8.2000, str. 17-41.
Out of the 13 integrated projects originally submitted, only eight were approved and only five were eventually completed.
Od trinajstih integriranih projektov, ki so bili prvotno predloženi, je bilo odobrenih le osem, pri čemer jih je bilo le pet dejansko dokončanih.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 866/90 of 29 March 1990 on improving the processing and marketing conditions for agricultural products (OJ L 91, 6.4.1990, pp. 1 to 6).
Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 866/90 z dne 29. marca 1990 o izboljšanju pogojev predelave in trženja kmetijskih proizvodov (UL L 91, 6.4.1990, str. 1).
In order to show compliance with the abovementioned requirement, at first the Italian authorities provided a study prepared by the Italian institute for studies, research and information on the agricultural market (ISMEA) of September 2000, which contained a general overview of the changes which characterised the slaughtering industry in Italy over the 1990s.
Italijanski organi so za dokaz o skladnosti z navedeno zahtevo najprej predložili študijo, ki jo je septembra 2000 izvedel Italijanski inštitut za študije, raziskave in informacije o kmetijskem trgu (ISMEA) ter je vsebovala splošen pregled sprememb, ki so bile v devetdesetih letih 20. stoletja značilne za industrijo za zakol.
The conclusion of the study was that over the 1990 to 1998 period, slaughtering capacity fell by 3 % in Italy.
V študiji so ugotovili, da so se zmogljivosti za zakol v obdobju od leta 1990 do leta 1998 v Italiji zmanjšale za 3 %.
According to the Italian authorities this contraction proved that the investments undertaken on the basis of the laws under assessment complied with the abovementioned sectoral restrictions.
Po navedbah italijanskih organov je to zmanjšanje dokaz, da so bile naložbe na podlagi zakonov v presoji v skladu z omenjenimi sektorskimi omejitvami.
The Commission objected that the contraction in slaughtering capacity described in the ISMEA study was the result of the trend in the meat sector over those years throughout Europe.
Komisija je ugovarjala, da je bilo zmanjšanje zmogljivosti za zakol iz študije rezultat trenda v sektorju za meso v tem obdobju v Evropi.
Indeed, the reduction in the number of slaughtering facilities and in the slaughtering capacity which characterised the sector in Italy over the 1990s (mainly as a result of the need to adjust to new hygiene standards) had already characterised the slaughtering sectors of other countries over the 1970s (for example, France).
Zmanjšanje števila obratov in zmogljivosti za zakol, ki je bilo v devetdesetih letih 20. stoletja značilno za sektor v Italiji (večinoma zaradi potrebe po prilagoditvi novim higienskim standardom), je bilo za sektorje za zakol v drugih državah značilno že v sedemdesetih letih 20. stoletja (npr. v Franciji).
As highlighted in the document, Italy started to reorganise its sector only later, during the 1980s and 1990s.
Kot je poudarjeno v dokumentu, je Italija začela s prestrukturiranjem sektorja šele pozneje, in sicer v osemdesetih in devetdesetih letih 20. stoletja.
The 3 % reduction claimed by the Italian authorities did not therefore prove compliance with Decision 90/342/EEC.
Triodstotno zmanjšanje, ki so ga navedli italijanski organi, tako ni dokazalo skladnosti s Sklepom 90/342/EGS.
The Italian authorities were therefore invited to provide the specific data of changes in slaughtering capacity brought about by the investments undertaken in each of the plants taking part in the integrated projects.
Italijanski organi so bili zato pozvani, da predložijo določene podatke o spremembah zmogljivosti za zakol, do katerih je prišlo zaradi naložb v vseh obratih, ki so sodelovali v integriranih projektih.
OJ C 74, 10.3.1998, p. 9, as amended (OJ C 258, 9.9.2000, p. 5).
UL C 74, 10.3.1998, str. 9, kakor je spremenjen (UL C 258, 9.9.2000, str. 5).
Gea and Val di Cesola were part of the original project Centro Carni Sud, that was not completed and therefore not admitted to financing.
Podjetji Gea in Val di Cesola sta sodelovali pri prvotnem projektu Centro Carni Sud, ki ni bil zaključen in zato ni bil upravičen do financiranja.
The two projects undertaken by Gea and Val di Cesola, however, were fully completed and financed.
Projekta, ki sta ju izvajala Gea in Val di Cesola, pa sta bila izvedena in financirana v celoti.
Council Directive 91/629/EEC of 19 November 1991 laying down minimum standards for the protection of calves (OJ L 340, 11.12.1991, pp. 28 to 32).
Direktiva Sveta 91/629/EGS z dne 19. novembra 1991 o določitvi minimalnih pogojev za zaščito telet (UL L 340, 11.12.1991, str. 28).
Council Directive 91/630/EEC of 19 November 1991 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs (OJ L 340, 11.12.1991, pp. 33 to 38).
Direktiva Sveta 91/630/EGS z dne 19. novembra 1991 o določitvi minimalnih pogojev za zaščito prašičev (UL L 340, 11.12.1991, str. 33).
Letter of the Italian authorities of 18 May 2000.
Dopis italijanskih organov z dne 18. maja 2000.
See p. 5 of the abovementioned letter.
Glej str. 5 navedenega dopisa.
Letter of the Italian authorities of 13 October 2000.
Dopis italijanskih organov z dne 13. oktobra 2000.
SEC(89) 343/2 of 7.3.1989.
SEC(89) 343/2 z dne 7. marca 1989.
Legislative Decree No 1 of 9 January 1999 (Riordino degli enti e delle società di promozione e istituzione della società Sviluppo Italia S.p.A).
Zakonodajna uredba št. 1 z dne 9. januarja 1999 („Riordino degli enti e delle società di promozione e istituzione della società Sviluppo Italia S.p.A“).
Bulletin EC 9-1984.
Bilten ES 9-1984.
For an overall commitment of ITL 33458 million.
V skupni obveznosti 33458 milijonov ITL.
Ibid., point 3.3.
Prav tam, točka 3.3.
As reported at 31 December of each year.
Kot je bilo sporočeno 31. decembra vsako leto.
Private companies and individuals: CoopFons Spa, Agricola Sabbadina srl, CCFR Scarl.
Podjetja v zasebni lasti in zasebniki: CoopFons Spa, Agricola Sabbadina srl, CCFR Scarl.
Among the credit institutes: Banca Agricola Mantovana, Em.
Kreditne ustanove: Banca Agricola Mantovana, Em.
Finagra, as financing member of cooperatives could appoint one member of the Administrative board and one of the statutory auditors' board.
Finagra je lahko kot financerka zadrug imenovala člana upravnega odbora in člana revizijskega odbora.
This amount includes the 4-year loan worth ITL 500 million to Unicarni and the 4-year loan worth ITL 3 billion to MCLC granted in 1996.
Ta vsota vključuje štiriletno posojilo zadrugi Unicarni v vrednosti 500 milijonov ITL in štiriletno posojilo zadrugi MCLC v vrednosti 3 milijarde ITL leta 1996.
MCLC also obtained loans in 1994 worth ITL 1500 million (letter by the Italian authorities dated 5 July 2001).
Zadruga MCLC je leta 1994 prejela tudi posojilo v vrednosti 1500 milijonov ITL (dopis italijanskih organov z dne 5. julija 2001).
Loan granted to Unicarni.
Posojilo, odobreno zadrugi Unicarni.
OJ C 307, 13.11.1993, pp. 3 to 14.
UL C 307, 13.11.1993, str. 3.
The guarantee granted by Finagra was indeed an additional guarantee, since the loan was already covered by a primary guarantee.
Garancija Finagre je bila dejansko dodatna garancija, ker je bilo posojilo zajeto že v prvotni garanciji.
The aid rates, expressed as gross grant equivalent of aid, following the method described in the Guidelines on Regional aid and including all forms of public aid accorded under Laws No 252/91 and No 67/88 (Law No 290/1999 did not modify the aid rates, the volume of aid, nor the beneficiaries of aid under Law No 252/91 and No 67/88) did not exceed the 75 % aid rate (for investments located in Objective 1 regions) and the 55 % aid rate which was authorised at the time for investments connected to the processing and marketing of agricultural products for areas located outside Objective 1.
Stopnje pomoči, izražene v bruto ekvivalentu dotacije pomoči po metodi iz Smernic o regionalni pomoči in vključno z vsemi oblikami javne pomoči, dodeljene v skladu z Zakonom št. 252/91 in Zakonom št. 67/88 (Zakon št. 290/1999 ni spremenil stopenj pomoči, obsega pomoči ali upravičencev do pomoči v skladu z Zakonom št. 252/91 in Zakonom št. 67/88), niso presegle 75-odstotne stopnje pomoči (za naložbe v regije iz cilja 1) in 55-odstotne stopnje pomoči, ki je bila odobrena v času naložb, povezanih s predelavo in trženjem kmetijskih proizvodov za območja zunaj cilja 1.
Regardless of their location, all investments under examination therefore complied with the maximum aid rates authorised by Community legislation in force at the time, as shown in Table 1 below.
Ne glede na njihovo lokacijo so bile vse naložbe v presoji zato v skladu z največjimi stopnjami pomoči, odobrenimi v skladu s takrat veljavno zakonodajo Skupnosti, kot prikazuje spodnja tabela 1.
On the whole, the investments allowed better ventilation of the premises, reduced animal density, improvement of the illumination, water distribution and so on.
Te naložbe so bile usmerjene v prestrukturiranje in izboljšanje vzrejnih centrov, da bi se zmanjšali proizvodni stroški, izboljšala kakovost, zdravje in dobro počutje živali.
Aid for the financial recovery of companies and debt consolidation
Pomoč za finančno sanacijo družb in konsolidacijo dolgov
the financial recovery needs never resulted in any transfer of public resources and their amount was deducted from the eligible expenses.
zahteve glede finančne sanacije niso nikoli povzročile nobenega prenosa javnih sredstev, njihova višina pa se je odštela od upravičenih stroškov.
VI.2(d) Concerning the loans referred to in Article 4 of Law No 290/99
O posojilih iz člena 4 Zakona št. 290/99
In their letter dated 27 February 2003, the Italian authorities clearly stated that the measure provided for in Article 4 of Law No 290/99 had never been implemented, since it was impossible to identify the credit operations that the law intended to finance (namely the operating, improvement and agricultural loans which expired on 31 March 1998).
Italijanski organi so v dopisu z dne 27. februarja 2003 jasno navedli, da se ukrep iz člena 4 Zakona št. 290/99 ni nikoli izvajal, ker je bilo nemogoče opredeliti kreditne posle, ki bi se financirali na podlagi tega zakona (in sicer posojila za poslovanje, izboljšave in kmetijstvo, ki so zapadla 31. marca 1998).
In particular, Article 35 stated that the regulation was without prejudice to the right of Member States to adopt additional aid measures in the areas covered by the Regulation with the exception of those covered by Articles 2, 6 to 9, 11, 12(2), (3) and (4), and 17 on terms differing from, or in amounts exceeding, the ceilings laid down in the Regulation, provided that Articles 92, 93 and 94 of the Treaty were not infringed.
Zlasti člen 35 navaja, da Uredba ne posega v pravico držav članic, da sprejmejo dodatne ukrepe pomoči na področjih, ki jih zajema Uredba, z izjemo tistih ukrepov, ki jih zajemajo členi 2, 6 do 9, 11, 12(2), (3), (4) in 17 o pogojih, ki se razlikujejo od zgornje meje iz Uredbe ali jo v zneskih presegajo, če niso kršeni členi 92, 93 in 94 Pogodbe.
Article 35(2) provides that Articles 92, 93 and 94 of the Treaty, with the exception of Article 92(2), did not apply to the aid measures governed by Articles 2, 6 to 9, 11, 12(2), (3) and (4), and 17.
Člen 35(2) določa, da se členi 92, 93 in 94 Pogodbe z izjemo člena 92(2) uporabljajo za ukrepe pomoči, ki jih urejajo členi 2, 6 do 9, 11, 12(2), (3), (4) in 17.
Finagra
Finagra (ITL)
the borrower had not received the loan at conditions more favourable than the normal market rate, because of Finagra's guarantee,
posojilojemalec posojila zaradi garancije Finagre ni prejel pod boljšimi pogoji kot je običajna tržna stopnja,
the guarantee was subject to specific conditions for recovering the credit, either by extra judicial settlement or, in compliance with the provisions contained in the Italian civil code, through the forced execution of credit on the guaranteed debtor's assets;
so za garancijo veljali posebni pogoji za izterjavo kredita, tj. z zunajsodno poravnavo ali, v skladu z določbami iz italijanskega civilnega zakonika, prisilnim rubežem premoženja dolžnika iz garancije,
These are:
To so:
aid for land purchase,
pomoč za nakup zemljišč,
By letter of 13 October 2000, the Italian authorities declared that aid for investments in primary production have only been granted under Law No 252/91 to three projects. These investments were aimed at restructuring and improving breeding centres in order to reduce production costs, improve quality and improve the health and well-being of animals.
V dopisu z dne 13. oktobra 2000 so italijanski organi navedli, da je bila pomoč za naložbe v primarno proizvodnjo v skladu z Zakonom št. 252/91 odobrena le za tri projekte.
In view of the foregoing, the abovementioned aid measures granted by the Italian authorities to carry out the investments in the primary production are compatible with the common market according to Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty. VI.1.(a) 3.
Ob upoštevanju navedenih ugotovitev so omenjeni ukrepi pomoči, ki so jih sprejeli italijanski organi za izvajanje naložb v primarno proizvodnjo, združljivi s skupnim trgom v skladu s členom 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES.
of 20 December 2006
z dne 20. december 2006
on State aid C 12/05 (ex N 611/03) which Germany is planning to implement for e–glass AG
o državni pomoči C 12/05 (ex N 611/03) Nemčije za podjetje e-glass AG
(notified under document number C(2006) 6587)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 6587)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty, and in particular Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES in zlasti člena 9 Uredbe,
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to those provisions and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi členi in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
By letter dated 15 December 2003, registered as received on 18 December 2003, Germany notified the Commission of planned investment aid for e-glass AG, Osterweddingen, (N 611/03) in accordance with the notification requirement laid down in the 1998 multisectoral framework on regional aid for large investment projects (hereinafter referred to as the ‘MSF 1998’).
Z dopisom z dne 15. decembra 2003, evidentiranim 18. decembra 2003, je Nemčija obvestila Komisijo o načrtovani podpori za naložbe za podjetje e-glass AG, Osterweddingen, (N 611/03) in tako izpolnila obveznost priglasitve posameznih projektov, določene v Večsektorskem okviru Skupnosti za regionalno pomoč, namenjeno večjim naložbenim projektom, iz leta 1998 (v nadaljevanju „MSR 1998“).
On 23 January and 27 February 2004, the Commission requested additional information.
Komisija je 23. januarja in 27. februarja 2004 zaprosila za nadaljnje informacije.
Germany provided the requested information by letters dated 13 February 2004, registered as received on the same day, and 4 March 2004, registered as received on the same day.
Nemčija je predložila zahtevane informacije z dopisom z dne 13. februarja 2004, evidentiranim istega dne, in z dopisom z dne 4. marca 2004, evidentiranim istega dne.
On 20 April 2004 the Commission approved, under reference C(2004) 1350 final, the aid intensity for e-glass AG notified under the MSF 1998.
Komisija je 20. aprila 2004 pod št. dokumenta C(2004) 1350 konč. odobrila priglašeno intenzivnost pomoči za podjetje e-glass AG v skladu s MSR 1998.
By letter dated 25 October 2004, registered as received on 26 October 2004, Germany informed the Commission that part of the information on the owners of e-glass AG in the initial notification was incorrect and asked the Commission for an amendment of the decision of 20 April 2004.
Z dopisom z dne 25. oktobra 2004, evidentiranim 26. oktobra 2004, je Nemčija obvestila Komisijo, da so nekateri podatki o lastnikih podjetja e-glass AG napačni, ter zaprosili Komisijo za spremembo odločbe z dne 20. aprila 2004.
By letter dated 8 February 2005, registered as received on 9 February 2005, Germany submitted additional information.
Nemčija je z dopisom z dne 8. februarja 2005, evidentiranim 9. februarja 2005, predložila dodatne informacije.
By letter dated 24 February 2005, reference D/51447, the Commission gave Germany the opportunity to comment on the Commission's intention of revoking its decision of 20 April 2004 by initiating the formal investigation procedure.
Z dopisom z dne 24. februarja 2005 pod št. dokumenta D/51447 je Komisija Nemčiji dala možnost, da izrazi svoje pripombe glede namena Komisije, da prekliče odločbo z dne 20. aprila 2004 in sproži formalni postopek preiskave.
Germany submitted its comments by letter dated 4 March 2005, registered as received on 8 March 2005.
Nemčija je svoje pripombe posredovala z dopisom z dne 4. marca 2005, ki je bil evidentiran 8. marca 2005.
By letter dated 20 April 2005, reference C(2005) 1114 final, the Commission informed Germany that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid for e-glass AG.
Komisija je Nemčijo z dopisom z dne 20. aprila 2005 pod št. dokumenta C(2005) 1114 konč. obvestila o svoji odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka po členu 88(2) Pogodbe ES v zvezi s pomočjo za podjetje e-glass AG.
Germany submitted its comments by letter dated 7 June 2005, registered as received on 9 June 2005.
Nemčija je svojo pripombo posredovala z dopisom z dne 7. junija 2005, ki je bil evidentiran 9. junija 2005.