natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
SIS II should constitute a compensatory measure contributing to maintaining a high level of security within the area of freedom, security and justice of the European Union by supporting the implementation of policies linked to the movement of persons that are part of the Schengen acquis, as integrated into Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty.
SIS II bi moral predstavljati izravnalni ukrep za vzdrževanje visoke stopnje varnosti na območju svobode, varnosti in pravice Evropske unije, saj zagotavlja lažje izvajanje ukrepov v zvezi s tistim delom schengenskega pravnega reda, ki ureja gibanje oseb, kakor je bil vključen v naslov IV tretjega dela Pogodbe.
It is necessary to specify the objectives of SIS II, its technical architecture and financing, to lay down rules concerning its operation and use and to define responsibilities, the categories of data to be entered into the system, the purposes for which the data are to be entered, the criteria for their entry, the authorities authorised to access the data, the interlinking of alerts and further rules on data processing and the protection of personal data.
Treba je opredeliti cilje SIS II, njegovo tehnično zgradbo in financiranje, da bi se določilo pravila glede njegovega delovanja in uporabe ter opredelilo pristojnosti, kategorije podatkov, ki jih je treba vnesti v sistem, namen vnosa podatkov, merila za njihov vnos, organe, pooblaščene za dostop do podatkov, medsebojne povezave med razpisi ukrepov in dodatne predpise o obdelavi podatkov in varstvu osebnih podatkov.
SIS II is to include a central system (Central SIS II) and national applications.
SIS II bo vključeval centralni sistem (Centralni SIS II) in nacionalne aplikacije.
The expenditure involved in the operation of Central SIS II and related communication infrastructure should be charged to the general budget of the European Union.
Izdatki, povezani z delovanjem centralnega SIS II in z njim povezane komunikacijske infrastrukture, bi morali bremeniti splošni proračun Evropske unije.
It is necessary to establish a manual setting out the detailed rules for the exchange of certain supplementary information concerning the action called for by alerts.
Treba je oblikovati priročnik s podrobnimi predpisi za izmenjavo nekaterih dopolnilnih podatkov v zvezi z razpisanim ukrepom.
National authorities in each Member State should ensure the exchange of this information.
Nacionalni organi v vsaki državi članici bi morali zagotoviti izmenjavo teh podatkov.
For a transitional period, the Commission should be responsible for the operational management of Central SIS II and of parts of the communication infrastructure.
V prehodnem obdobju bi morala biti za operativno upravljanje centralnega SIS II in delov komunikacijske infrastrukture odgovorna Komisija.
However, in order to ensure a smooth transition to SIS II, it may delegate some or all of these responsibilities to two national public sector bodies.
Da se zagotovi nemoten prehod na SIS II, pa Komisija lahko to pristojnost deloma ali v celoti prenese na dva nacionalna organa javnega sektorja.
In the long term, and following an impact assessment containing a substantive analysis of alternatives from a financial, operational and organisational perspective, and legislative proposals from the Commission, a management authority with responsibility for these tasks should be established.
Na podlagi presoje vpliva, ki vsebuje podrobno analizo alternativnih možnosti s finančnega, operativnega in organizacijskega vidika, ter zakonodajnih predlogov Komisije bi bilo treba dolgoročno gledano vzpostaviti organ za upravljanje, ki bo odgovoren za te naloge.
The transitional period should last for no more than five years from the date from which this Regulation applies.
Prehodno obdobje ne bi smelo trajati več kot pet let od datuma začetka uporabe te uredbe.
SIS II is to contain alerts for the purpose of refusing entry or stay.
SIS II bi moral vsebovati razpise ukrepov zaradi zavrnitve vstopa ali prepovedi bivanja.
It is necessary to further consider harmonising the provisions on the grounds for issuing alerts concerning third-country nationals for the purpose of refusing entry or stay and to clarifying their use in the framework of asylum, immigration and return policies.
Treba je nadalje preučiti uskladitev določb o razlogih za izdajo razpisov ukrepov v zvezi z državljani tretjih držav zaradi zavrnitve vstopa ali prepovedi bivanja in razjasniti njihovo uporabo v okviru politik azila, priseljevanja in vračanja.
Therefore, the Commission should review, three years after the date from which this Regulation applies, the provisions on the objectives of and conditions for issuing alerts for the purpose of refusing entry or stay.
Zato bi morala Komisija v treh letih po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe pregledati določbe o ciljih in pogojih za izdajo razpisov ukrepov zaradi zavrnitve vstopa ali prepovedi bivanja.
Alerts for the purpose of refusing entry or stay should not be kept longer in SIS II than the time required to fulfil the purposes for which they were supplied.
Razpisi ukrepov, katerih cilj je zavrnitev vstopa ali prepoved bivanja, bi se morali v SIS II hraniti le toliko časa, kot je to potrebno za izpolnitev njihovega namena, za katerega so bili zagotovljeni.
As a general principle, they should be automatically erased from SIS II after a period of three years.
Načeloma bi jih bilo treba iz SIS II samodejno izbrisati po treh letih.
Any decision to keep an alert for a longer period should be based on a comprehensive individual assessment.
Odločitev o ohranitvi razpisa za daljši čas bi morala temeljiti na celoviti posamični oceni.
Member States should review these alerts within this three-year period and keep statistics about the number of alerts the retention period of which has been extended.
Države članice bi morale v teh treh letih pregledati te razpise ukrepov in hraniti statistične podatke o številu razpisov, katerih obdobje hranjenja je bilo podaljšano.
SIS II should permit the processing of biometric data in order to assist in the reliable identification of the individuals concerned.
SIS II bi moral omogočati obdelavo biometričnih podatkov, ki naj bi pripomogli k zanesljivi identifikaciji zadevnih oseb.
In the same perspective SIS II should also allow for the processing of data concerning individuals whose identity has been misused in order to avoid inconveniences caused by their misidentification, subject to suitable safeguards, in particular the consent of the individual concerned and a strict limitation of the purposes for which such data can be lawfully processed.
V istem kontekstu bi moral SIS II omogočati tudi obdelavo podatkov oseb, katerih identiteta je bila zlorabljena, da se prepreči neprijetnosti zaradi napačne identifikacije, pri tem je treba upoštevati ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe, zlasti soglasje zadevnih oseb in strogo omejitev namenov, v katere se take podatke lahko zakonito obdeluje.
It should be possible for Member States to establish links between alerts in SIS II.
Državam članicam bi moralo biti omogočeno, da v SIS II razpise ukrepov med seboj povežejo.
The establishment by a Member State of links between two or more alerts should have no impact on the action to be taken, their retention period or the access rights to the alerts.
Vzpostavitev povezav med dvema ali več razpisi ukrepov s strani države članice ne bi smela vplivati na ukrep, ki ga je treba izvesti, obdobje hranjenja ali pravice dostopa do razpisov ukrepov.
Data processed in SIS II in application of this Regulation should not be transferred or made available to third countries or to international organisations.
Podatki, obdelani v SIS II v okviru uporabe te uredbe, se ne bi smeli posredovati ali dati na razpolago tretji državi ali mednarodnim organizacijam.
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [6] applies to the processing of personal data carried out in application of this Regulation.
Direktiva 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [6] se uporablja za obdelavo osebnih podatkov v okviru uporabe te uredbe.
This includes the designation of the controller and the possibility for Member States to provide for exemptions and restrictions to some of the rights and obligations provided for in that Directive including the rights of access and information of the individual concerned.
To vključuje imenovanje nadzornika ter možnost držav članic, da določijo izjeme in omejitve glede nekaterih določenih pravic in obveznosti iz navedene direktive, vključno kar zadeva pravice zadevnih posameznikov do dostopa in obveščanja.
The principles set out in Directive 95/46/EC should be supplemented or clarified in this Regulation, where necessary.
Kjer je potrebno, je treba načela iz Direktive 95/46/ES v tej uredbi dopolniti ali podrobneje pojasniti.
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [7], and in particular the provisions thereof concerning confidentiality and security of processing, apply to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions or bodies when carrying out their responsibilities in the operational management of SIS II.
Kadar institucije ali organi Skupnosti izvajajo svoje naloge kot odgovorni organ za operativno upravljanje SIS II, se za obdelavo osebnih podatkov uporablja Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [7], zlasti določbe o zaupnosti in varnosti obdelave.
The principles set out in Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 should be supplemented or clarified in this Regulation, where necessary.
Kjer je potrebno, je treba načela iz Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 v tej uredbi dopolniti ali podrobneje pojasniti.
Insofar as confidentiality is concerned, the relevant provisions of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and the conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities should apply to officials or other servants employed and working in connection with SIS II.
Kar zadeva zaupnost, bi se morale za zaposlene uradnike in druge uslužbence Evropskih skupnosti, ki delajo na področju SIS II, uporabljati ustrezne določbe Kadrovskih predpisov za uradnike Evropskih skupnosti in pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Evropskih skupnosti.
It is appropriate that national supervisory authorities monitor the lawfulness of the processing of personal data by the Member States, whilst the European Data Protection Supervisor, appointed pursuant to Decision 2004/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 December 2003 appointing the independent supervisory body provided for in Article 286 of the EC Treaty [8], should monitor the activities of the Community institutions and bodies in relation to the processing of personal data in view of the limited tasks of the Community institutions and bodies with regard to the data themselves.
Primerno bi bilo, da bi nacionalni nadzorni organi spremljali zakonitost obdelav osebnih podatkov, ki jih izvajajo države članice, Evropski nadzornik za varstvo osebnih podatkov, imenovan v skladu s Sklepom 2004/55/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. decembra 2003 o imenovanju neodvisnega nadzornega organa, kakor je določeno v členu 286 Pogodbe ES [8], pa bi moral spremljati dejavnosti institucij in organov Skupnosti v zvezi z obdelavo osebnih podatkov v okviru omejenih nalog institucij in organov Skupnosti v zvezi s samimi podatki.
Both the Member States and the Commission should draw up a security plan in order to facilitate the implementation of security obligations and should cooperate with each other in order to address security issues from a common perspective.
Države članice in Komisija bi morale pripraviti varnostni načrt, ki bo omogočil lažje praktično izvajanje obveznosti glede varnosti, ter sodelovati, da bi se reševanja vprašanj glede varnosti lotevali usklajeno.
In order to ensure transparency, a report on the technical functioning of Central SIS II and the communication infrastructure, including its security, and on the exchange of supplementary information should be produced every two years by the Commission or, when it is established, the management authority.
Zaradi zagotovitve preglednosti bi morala Komisija oziroma, v primeru, da je ustanovljen, organ za upravljanje vsake dve leti pripraviti poročilo o tehničnem delovanju centralnega SIS II in komunikacijske infrastrukture, vključno z varnostjo, ter o izmenjavi dopolnilnih podatkov.
An overall evaluation should be issued by the Commission every four years.
Komisija bi morala vsake štiri leta podati celovito oceno.
Certain aspects of SIS II, such as technical rules on entering data, including data required for entering an alert, updating, deleting and searching data, rules on compatibility and priority of alerts, links between alerts and the exchange of supplementary information cannot, owing to their technical nature, level of detail and need for regular updating, be covered exhaustively by the provisions of this Regulation.
Nekaterih vidikov SIS II, kot so tehnična pravila o vnašanju podatkov, vključno s podatki, potrebnimi za vnos razpisa ukrepa, posodabljanju, brisanju in iskanju podatkov, pravila o skladnosti in prednostni obravnavi razpisanih ukrepov, povezavi med razpisanimi ukrepi in izmenjavi dopolnilnih podatkov, določbe te uredbe ne morejo izčrpno pokriti zaradi njihove tehnične narave, stopnje podrobnosti in potrebe po rednem posodabljanju.
Implementing powers in respect of those aspects should therefore be delegated to the Commission.
Zato bi bilo v zvezi s temi vidiki Komisiji treba podeliti izvedbena pooblastila.
Technical rules on searching alerts should take into account the smooth operation of national applications.
Pri tehničnih pravilih za preverjanje razpisov ukrepov bi bilo treba upoštevati nemoteno delovanje nacionalnih uporabniških programov.
Subject to an impact assessment by the Commission, it should be decided to what extent the implementing measures could be the responsibility of the management authority, once it is set up.
Po presoji vpliva, ki jo bo opravila Komisija, bi bilo treba sprejeti odločitev o tem, v kolikšni meri bi lahko izvedbene ukrepe prenesli na organ za upravljanje takoj po njegovi vzpostavitvi.
It is appropriate to lay down transitional provisions in respect of alerts issued in SIS 1+ which are to be transferred to SIS II.
Primerno je določiti prehodne določbe glede razpisov ukrepov, izdanih v SIS 1+, ki se jih bo preneslo v SIS II.
Some provisions of the Schengen acquis should continue to apply for a limited period of time until the Member States have examined the compatibility of those alerts with the new legal framework.
Nekatere določbe schengenskega pravnega reda bi se morale določen čas uporabljati še naprej, dokler države članice ne bi preverile skladnosti navedenih razpisov ukrepov z novim pravnim okvirom.
The compatibility of alerts on persons should be examined as a matter of priority.
Preučitev skladnosti razpisov ukrepov za osebe bi morala biti prednostna naloga.
Furthermore, any modification, addition, correction or update of an alert transferred from SIS 1+ to SIS II, as well as any hit on such an alert, should trigger an immediate examination of its compatibility with the provisions of this Regulation.
Poleg tega je treba ob kakršni koli spremembi, dodajanju, popravljanju ali posodabljanju razpisa, ki je bil prenesen iz SIS 1+ v SIS II, pa tudi pri vsakem zadetku za takšen razpis takoj pregledati njihovo skladnost z določbami te uredbe.
It is necessary to lay down specific provisions regarding the part of the budget earmarked for operations of SIS which is not part of the general budget of the European Union.
Treba je določiti posebne določbe glede neporabljenih sredstev, namenjenih za dejavnosti SIS, ki niso del splošnega proračuna Evropske unije.
Since the objectives of the action to be taken, namely the establishment and regulation of a joint information system, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale and effects of the action, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Ker ciljev predlaganega ukrepa, in sicer vzpostavitve skupnega informacijskega sistema in njegove pravne ureditve, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker ta cilj zaradi obsega in učinkov predlaganega ukrepa laže doseže Skupnost, lahko Skupnost sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve those objectives.
Skladno z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta uredba ne prekoračuje okvirov, ki so potrebni za doseganje teh ciljev.
This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Ta uredba spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva sprejeta načela, zlasti tista, ki jih priznava Listina o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark does not take part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča in se zanjo ne uporablja.
Given that this Regulation builds upon the Schengen acquis under the provisions of Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty, Denmark shall, in accordance with Article 5 of the said Protocol, decide within a period of six months after date of the adoption of this Regulation whether it will transpose it in its national law.
Glede na to, da ta uredba temelji na schengenskem pravnem redu po določbah naslova IV tretjega dela Pogodbe, se mora Danska v skladu s členom 5 navedenega protokola v roku šestih mesecev po datumu sprejetja te uredbe odločiti, ali jo bo prenesla v svojo nacionalno zakonodajo.
This Regulation constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [10].
Ta uredba predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, pri izvajanju katerih Združeno kraljestvo ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/365/ES z dne 29. maja 2000 o prošnji Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [10].
The United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Združeno kraljestvo zato ne sodeluje pri njenem sprejetju, zanj ni zavezujoča in se zanj ne uporablja.
This Regulation constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland's request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [11].
Ta uredba predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, pri izvajanju katerih Irska ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2002/192/ES z dne 28. februarja 2002 o prošnji Irske, da sodeluje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [11].
Ireland is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Irska zato ne sodeluje pri njenem sprejetju te, zanjo ni zavezujoča in se zanjo ne uporablja.
This Regulation is without prejudice to the arrangements for the United Kingdom's and Ireland's partial participation in the Schengen acquis as defined in Decision 2000/365/EC and Decision 2002/192/EC respectively.
Ta uredba ne posega v dogovor o delnem sodelovanju Združenega kraljestva in Irske pri izvajanju schengenskega pravnega reda, kakor je določen v Sklepu 2000/365/ES oziroma Sklepu 2002/192/ES.
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Regulation constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the association of those two States with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [12], which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point G, of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 [13] on certain arrangements for the application of that Agreement.
Ta uredba za Islandijo in Norveško pomeni nadaljnji razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško v zvezi s pridružitvijo teh dveh držav k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [12], ki sodijo v področje iz točke G člena 1 Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES z dne 17. maja 1999 [13] o nekaterih izvedbenih predpisih za uporabo navedenega sporazuma.
An arrangement should be made to allow representatives of Iceland and Norway to be associated with the work of committees assisting the Commission in the exercise of its implementing powers.
Treba bi se bilo dogovoriti o ureditvi, ki bo predstavnikom Islandije in Norveške omogočila sodelovanje v odborih, ki Komisiji pomagajo pri izvajanju izvedbenih pooblastil.
Such an arrangement has been contemplated in the Exchanges of Letters between the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning committees which assist the European Commission in the exercise of its executive powers [14], annexed to the abovementioned Agreement.
Tak dogovor je bil predviden v izmenjavi pisem med Svetom Evropske unije ter Republiko Islandijo in Kraljevino Norveško o odborih, ki pomagajo Evropski komisiji pri izvajanju izvedbenih pooblastil [14], ki so priložena k zgoraj navedenemu sporazumu.
As regards Switzerland, this Regulation constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement signed between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the association of the Swiss Confederation with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point G, of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 4(1) of Council Decisions 2004/849/EC [15] and 2004/860/EC [16].
Ta uredba za Švico predstavlja nadaljnji razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma, podpisanega med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda, ki sodijo na področje iz točke G člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES, v povezavi s členom 4(1) sklepov Sveta 2004/849/ES [15] in 2004/860/ES [16].
An arrangement should be made to allow representatives of Switzerland to be associated with the work of committees assisting the Commission in the exercise of its implementing powers.
Treba bi se bilo dogovoriti o ureditvi, ki bo predstavnikom Švice omogočila sodelovanje v odborih, ki Komisiji pomagajo pri izvajanju izvedbenih pooblastil.
This Regulation constitutes an act building on the Schengen acquis or otherwise related to it within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the 2003 Act of Accession.
Ta uredba predstavlja akt, ki temelji na schengenskem pravnem redu oziroma je z njim kako drugače povezan v smislu člena 3(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2003.