natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Finally, it is recalled and reconfirmed that the individual markups may vary significantly from one operator to the other, but they are on average substantial, in particular in the retail stage.
Končno je treba opozoriti in ponovno potrditi, da se med posameznimi nosilci dejavnosti pribitki lahko znatno razlikujejo, vendar pa so v povprečju vsi znatni, predvsem v fazi maloprodaje.
One Chinese exporting producer argued that the Community consumers should not be deprived of the high quality Chinese products sold at the most reasonable price.
En kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da potrošniki v Skupnosti ne smejo biti prikrajšani za visokokakovostne kitajske izdelke, prodajane po zmernih cenah.
In this respect, reference is made to recital 53 above and recital 59 below and it is concluded that the Community market would not be deprived of such products.
S tem v zvezi se navaja sklicevanje na uvodni izjavi 53 zgoraj in 59 spodaj, ter ugotovitev, da trg Skupnosti za take proizvode ne bo prikrajšan.
In the absence of any other comments in this respect, recitals 147 to 150 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb v zvezi s tem ni bilo, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 147 do 150 začasne uredbe.
Interest of distributors/retailers
Interes distributerjev/trgovcev na drobno
In the absence of any comments in this respect, reference is made to recitals 52 to 54 above and recital 151 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s tem ni bilo drugih pripomb, se sklicuje na uvodne izjave 52) do 54 zgoraj in se potrdi uvodna izjava 151 začasne uredbe.
Following the provisional disclosure, two importers referred to in recital 152 of the provisional Regulation came forward with comments concerning their interest.
Dva uvoznika, navedena v uvodni izjavi 152 začasne uredbe, sta po začasnem razkritju predložila pripombe v zvezi s svojimi interesi.
No other comments were received in this respect.
V zvezi s tem ni bilo drugih pripomb.
One of these importers disagreed with the assessment concerning the allocation of the burden of anti-dumping measures and the level of the markups applied at different stages of the sale (see recitals 52 to 54 above).
Eden od teh uvoznikov se ni strinjal z oceno glede razporeditve obremenitev protidampinških ukrepov ter stopnjo uporabljenega pribitka v različnih fazah prodaje (glej uvodne izjave 52 do 54 zgoraj).
It submitted that it will not be able to absorb any of the additional cost and, thus, it will have to pass it on in full to retailers.
Trdil je, da ne more absorbirati nobenih dodatnih stroškov in jih bo zato moral v celoti preložiti na trgovce na drobno.
Consequently, it may see its Community sales of the product concerned decreased and may allegedly even be forced to lay off employees.
Zato se bo njegova prodaja zadevnega izdelka v Skupnosti lahko zmanjšala in domnevno bo celo prisiljen odpustiti zaposlene.
However, given the small contribution of the product concerned on its total turnover (less than 5 %), the size of this company and its position on Community and export markets, as well as its different sources of supply for the product concerned, any adverse effect on its business would certainly be minor.
Vendar bodo ob upoštevanju majhnega deleža, ki ga v njegovem skupnem prometu predstavlja zadevni izdelek (manj kot 5 %), velikosti družbe, njenega položaja v Skupnosti in izvoznih trgih, kakor tudi različnih virov ponudbe zadevnega izdelka, vsi škodljivi učinki na njegovo podjetje gotovo majhni.
The importer referred to in recital 154 of the provisional Regulation reiterated that the impact of the measures on its business may be significant, even though its total sales of ironing boards do not represent more than 10 % of its total turnover.
Uvoznik, naveden v uvodni izjavi 154 začasne uredbe, je ponovil, da bo učinek ukrepov na njegovo družbo lahko znaten, čeprav skupna prodaja likalnih desk ne predstavlja več kot 10 % njegovega skupnega prometa.
It argued that any loss of the market of ironing boards would result in even higher loss of the market of the covers which are produced by this company.
Trdil je, da bo izguba trga likalnih desk povzročila še večjo izgubo trga prevlek za likalne deske, ki jih proizvaja njegova družba.
It explained that ironing boards and their covers are closely linked even when not sold together, since most retailers prefer to buy these products from the same supplier.
Pojasnil je, da so likalne deske in njihove prevleke tesno povezane tudi, kadar niso prodajane skupaj, saj večina trgovcev na drobno zadevne izdelke raje nabavlja pri istem dobavitelju.
Thus, any loss of sales of the imported ironing boards equipped with covers produced by this importer would result in corresponding loss of sales of the company’s replacement covers.
Zato bi vsako zmanjšanje prodaje uvoženih likalnih desk, opremljenih s prevleko, ki jo proizvaja navedeni uvoznik, povzročilo tudi ustrezno zmanjšanje prodaje nadomestnih prevlek, ki jih proizvaja družba.
In this respect it is accepted that the impact of the measures on certain Community sales of this importer might be significant.
V zvezi s tem se sprejme, da je učinek ukrepov na določeno prodajo tega uvoznika v Skupnosti lahko znaten.
However, the impact on its total turnover will remain limited since ironing boards and replacement covers taken together represent around 30 % of its total turnover.
Vendar bo učinek na njegov skupni promet ostal omejen, ker likalne deske in nadomestne prevleke skupaj predstavljajo približno 30 % njegovega skupnega prometa.
Moreover, the impact will in part depend on the importer’s export performance, since its re-exports of the product concerned are not negligible and these sales should normally not be affected by the measures.
Poleg tega bo učinek delno odvisen od uvoznikovega izvoza, saj njegov ponovni izvoz zadevnega izdelka ni zanemarljiv in ukrepi običajno ne učinkujejo na zadevno prodajo.
In this respect and with reference to recitals 152 to 156 of the provisional Regulation and recitals 52 to 54 above, the following definitive conclusions are drawn in respect of the impact of the anti-dumping measures on the situation of unrelated importers of ironing boards in the Community: (i) the importers would likely bear a somewhat higher burden than the retailers, (ii) the situation of certain importers could be affected more significantly, however (iii) on average the adverse impact of the measures would not be decisive for their operations and not disproportionate when compared with the expected benefits for the Community industry.
V zvezi s tem in s sklicem na uvodne izjave 152 do 156 začasne uredbe ter uvodne izjave 52 do 54 zgoraj, se v zvezi z učinkom protidampinških ukrepov na položaj nepovezanih uvoznikov likalnih desk v Skupnosti potrdijo naslednje dokončne sklepne ugotovitve: (i) uvozniki bodo verjetno nosili nekoliko večje breme kot trgovci na drobno, (ii) vpliv na položaj določenih uvoznikov bo lahko večji, vendar (iii) povprečno negativne posledice ukrepov ne bodo odločilne za njihovo delovanje ter bodo sorazmerne s pričakovanimi koristmi industrije Skupnosti.
The above additional analysis concerning the interest of the consumers and unrelated importers in the Community has not altered the provisional conclusions in this respect.
Zgornja dodatna analiza glede interesa potrošnikov in nepovezanih uvoznikov v Skupnosti ni spremenila začasnih sklepnih ugotovitev v zvezi s tem.
Even if in certain cases the burden could be fully passed on to consumers, any negative financial impact on the latter would in any event be negligible.
Tudi če bo v nekaterih primerih obremenitev v celoti prenesena na potrošnike, bo negativni finančni učinek nanje v vsakem primeru zanemarljiv.
It was further confirmed that any adverse impact on certain importers would not be decisive for their business.
Poleg tega je bilo potrjeno, da negativni učinek poslovanja na določene uvoznike za njihovo družbo ne bi bil odločilen.
On this basis, it is considered that the conclusions regarding the Community interest as set out in recitals 157 to 162 of the provisional Regulation are not altered.
Na tej podlagi se sklene, da se sklepi glede interesa Skupnosti iz izjav 157 do 162 začasne uredbe ne spremenijo.
The complainants argued that the injury elimination level, as provisionally set out, was not sufficient to eliminate the injury to the Community industry.
Pritožniki so trdili, da stopnja odprave škode, kot je začasno določena, ne zadostuje za odpravo škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
In particular, it was argued that: (a) the pre-tax profit margin used in the calculation is lower than the margin that could be reasonably achieved under normal conditions of competition, and (b) the cost of production, as calculated by the Commission for establishing the injury elimination level, does not reflect the actual cost of production of the different product types.
Trdili so predvsem, da: (a) je stopnja dobička pred obdavčitvijo, uporabljena v izračunih, nižja kot stopnja, dosežena v okviru normalnih konkurenčnih pogojev, in (b) da proizvodni stroški, ki jih je izračunala Komisija za določitev stopnje odprave škode, ne odražajo dejanskih proizvodnih stroškov različnih vrst izdelkov.
As regards the profit margin that could reasonably be expected in the absence of injurious dumping, it is recalled that the 7 % margin is based on the profitability of the Community industry before the influx of the dumped imports (see recital 44 above).
V zvezi z običajno pričakovano stopnjo dobička brez škodljivega dampinga je treba opozoriti, da 7 % stopnja temelji na dobičkonosnosti industrije Skupnosti pred vdorom dampinškega uvoza (glej uvodno izjavo 44 zgoraj).
Such margin is thus considered reasonable and the Community industry did not provide any evidence to refute this.
Takšna stopnja se zato šteje za primerno in industrija Skupnosti ni predložila nobenega nasprotnega dokaza.
Its claim is therefore rejected.
Ta trditev je zato zavrnjena.
As regards the cost of production, it is noted that no precise and verifiable details on the actual cost of production per product type was submitted by the Community industry for the IP.
V zvezi s proizvodnimi stroški je treba opozoriti, da industrija Skupnosti za OP ni predložila nobene natančne in preverljive podrobnosti o dejanskih proizvodnih stroških na vrsto proizvoda.
Therefore, the cost of production per product type can only be based on the actual prices of each Community producer adjusted by the actual overall profit it realised in the IP for the like product.
Zato lahko proizvodni stroški na vrsto proizvoda temeljijo samo na dejanskih cenah vsakega proizvajalca Skupnosti, prilagojenih za dejanski skupni dobiček, ustvarjen v OP za podobni izdelek.
Given that the profit margin of the Community industry was revised as explained in recital 44 above, the injury elimination level was amended accordingly.
Ob upoštevanju, da je bila stopnja dobička industrije Skupnosti pregledana, kot je bilo pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 44 zgoraj, je bila ustrezno spremenjena stopnja odprave škode.
It is recalled that the import prices of the Chinese cooperating exporting producers were amended as explained in recital 42 above.
Treba je opozoriti, da so bile uvozne cene kitajskih sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov spremenjene, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 42 zgoraj.
Thus, the injury elimination level for these exporters was also amended accordingly.
Zato je bila za te izvoznike ustrezno spremenjena stopnja odprave škode.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the injury elimination level, recitals 164 to 166 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb v zvezi s stopnjo odprave škode, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 164 do 166 začasne uredbe.
In the light of the foregoing and in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed at the level of the dumping margins found, since for all the exporting producers concerned the injury elimination level was found to be higher than the dumping margin.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno in v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe je treba uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na stopnji ugotovljene stopnje dampinga, ker je bilo za vse zadevne proizvajalce izvoznike ugotovljeno, da je stopnja odprave škode višja kot stopnja dampinga.
On the basis of the above, the definitive duty rates for the PRC and Ukraine are as follows:
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega so dokončne dajatve za LRK in Ukrajino naslednje:
All other companies
vse druge družbe
All companies
vse družbe
Following the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of definitive anti-dumping measures, the sole exporting producer in Ukraine and four Chinese exporting producers not granted MET (one of which was not even granted individual treatment) proposed price undertakings in accordance with Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih naj bi se priporočila uvedba dokončnih protidampinških dajatev, so edini proizvajalec izvoznik v Ukrajini in štirje kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, ki jim TGO ni bila odobrena (enemu ni bila odobrena niti individualna obravnava), ponudili cenovno zavezo v skladu s členom 8(1) osnovne uredbe.
However, it is noted that the product concerned is characterised by a considerable number of product types, which often change depending on the orders of the customers and which have significant price variations between them.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da so za zadevni izdelek značilne številne vrste izdelkov, ki se glede na naročila potrošnikov pogosto spreminjajo in se znatno razlikujejo v cenah.
Moreover, the exporting producers sell together with the product concerned other products to the same customers thus creating a significant risk of cross compensation of prices.
Poleg tega proizvajalci izvozniki skupaj z zadevnim izdelkom istim strankam prodajajo tudi druge izdelke, kar ustvarja veliko tveganje za križno kompenzacijo cen.
The nature of the product and its complex marketing make virtually impossible to establish meaningful minimum import prices for each product type, which could be properly monitored by the Commission without serious risk of circumvention.
Narava izdelka in zahtevno trženje dejansko onemogočata vzpostavitev najmanjše uvozne cene za vsako vrsto izdelka, ki bi jo Komisija lahko pravilno spremljala brez velikega tveganja izogibanja.
On the basis of the above, it was concluded that such undertakings are impractical and therefore they cannot be accepted.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je bilo sklenjeno, da so take zaveze nesmiselne zato se jih ne more sprejeti.
The parties were informed accordingly and given an opportunity to comment.
Stranke so bile o tem ustrezno obveščene in dana jim je bila možnost za predložitev pripomb.
However, their comments have not altered the above conclusion.
Vendar njihove pripombe niso spremenile zgornje sklepne ugotovitve.
Therefore, they reflect the situation found during that investigation with respect to these companies.
Zato odražajo stanje, v kakršnem so bile te družbe med preiskavo.
These duty rates (as opposed to the countrywide duty applicable to all other companies) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of products originating in the country concerned and produced by the companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Te stopnje dajatev (v nasprotju z dajatvijo za celotno državo, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“) se tako uporabljajo izključno za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz zadevne države, ki jih proizvajajo družbe, tj. posamezne navedene pravne osebe.
In view of the magnitude of the dumping margins found and in the light of the level of the injury caused to the Community industry, it is considered necessary that the amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty imposed by the provisional Regulation, i.e. Regulation (EC) No 1620/2006, be collected definitively to the extent of the amount of the duty definitively imposed by the present Regulation.
Glede na višino ugotovljenih stopenj dampinga in glede na stopnjo škode, povzročene industriji Skupnosti, se šteje, da je treba zneske, zavarovane z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo, uvedeno z začasno uredbo, tj. Uredbo (ES) št. 1620/2006, dokončno pobrati v višini zneska s to uredbo dokončno uvedene dajatve.
Where the definitive duty is lower than the provisional duty, the duty shall be recalculated and the amounts secured in excess of the definitive duty rate should be released,
Kjer je dokončna dajatev nižja od začasnih dajatev, se dajatev preračuna in začasno zavarovani zneski, ki presegajo dokončno stopnjo protidampinških dajatev, sprostijo –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of ironing boards, whether or not free-standing, with or without a steam soaking and/or heating top and/or blowing top, including sleeve boards, and essential parts thereof, i.e. the legs, the top and the iron rest originating in the People’s Republic of China and Ukraine, falling within CN codes ex39249090, ex44219098, ex73239390, ex73239991, ex73239999, ex85167970 and ex85169000 (TARIC codes 3924909010, 4421909810, 7323939010, 7323999110, 7323999910, 8516797010 and 8516900051).
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz likalnih desk, prostostoječih ali ne, z ali brez sistema za vsrkavanje odvečne pare in/ali ogrevalnega sistema in/ali sistema za pihanje zraka, vključno z rokavniki, in njihovih bistvenih delov, tj. podnožjem, prevleko in odlagalno površino za likalnik, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Ukrajine, uvrščenih pod oznake KN ex39249090, ex44219098, ex73239390, ex73239991, ex73239999, ex85167970 in ex85169000 (oznake TARIC 3924909010, 4421909810, 7323939010, 7323999110, 7323999910, 8516797010 in 8516900051).
Amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1620/2006 on imports of ironing boards, whether or not free-standing, with or without a steam soaking and/or heating top and/or blowing top, including sleeve boards, and essential parts thereof, i.e. the legs, the top and the iron rest originating in the People’s Republic of China and Ukraine, falling within CN codes ex39249090, ex44219098, ex73239390, ex73239991, ex73239999, ex85167970 and ex85169000 (TARIC codes 3924909010, 4421909810, 7323939010, 7323999110, 7323999910, 8516797010 and 8516900051) shall be definitively collected.
Zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1620/2006 o uvozu likalnih desk, prostostoječih ali ne, z ali brez sistema za vsrkavanje odvečne pare in/ali ogrevalnega sistema in/ali sistema za pihanje zraka, vključno z rokavniki, in njihovih bistvenih delov, tj. podnožja, prevleke in odlagalne površine za likalnik, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Ukrajine, uvrščene pod oznake KN ex39249090, ex44219098, ex73239390, ex73239991, ex73239999, ex85167970 in ex85169000 (oznake TARIC 3924909010, 4421909810, 7323939010, 7323999110, 7323999910, 8516797010 in 8516900051), se dokončno poberejo.
The amounts secured in excess of the amount of the definitive anti-dumping duty shall be released.
Zavarovani zneski, ki presegajo znesek dokončnih protidampinških dajatev, se sprostijo.
OJ L 300, 31.10.2006, p. 13.
UL L 300, 31.10.2006, str. 13.
European Commission, Directorate General for Trade, Directorate H, J-79 5/17, Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Brussels.
Eropean Commission, Directorate General for Trade, Directorate B, J-79 5/17, Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Brussels.
Regarding the importer’s comments set out in recital 52 above, the following should be noted.
V zvezi s pripombami uvoznika, navedenimi v uvodni izjavi 52 zgoraj, je treba opozoriti na naslednje.
Firstly, the importer in question admitted that any impact of anti-dumping measures on the consumers would be negligible, considering the useful life of an ironing board.
Prvič, zadevni uvoznik je priznal, da bi bil glede na dobo trajanja likalne deske učinek protidampinških ukrepov na potrošnike zanemarljiv.
Council Regulation (EC) No 453/2007
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 453/2007
laying down the weightings applicable from 1 July 2006 to the remuneration of officials, temporary staff and contract staff of the European Communities serving in third countries and of certain officials remaining in post in the two new Member States for a maximum period of 19 months after accession
o določitvi ponderjev, ki se uporabljajo od 1. julija 2006 za osebne prejemke uradnikov, pogodbenega osebja in začasnega osebja Evropskih skupnosti, ki delajo v tretjih državah, ter nekaterih uradnikov, zaposlenih v dveh novih državah članicah za obdobje največ devetnajst mesecev po pristopu
Having regard to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and the Conditions of employment of other servants of the Communities laid down by Regulation of the Council (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 [1], and in particular the first paragraph of Article 13 of Annex X thereto,
ob upoštevanju Kadrovskih predpisov Evropskih skupnosti in pogojev za zaposlitev, ki se uporabljajo za druge uslužbence teh skupnosti, določenih z Uredbo Sveta (EGS, Euratom, ESPJ) št. 259/68 [1], in zlasti prvega odstavka člena 13 Priloge X h Kadrovskim predpisom,
Having regard to the 2005 Act of Accession, and in particular Article 27(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Akta o pristopu iz leta 2005 in zlasti člena 27(4) Akta,
It is necessary to take account of changes in the cost of living in countries outside the Community and to determine accordingly the weightings applicable from 1 July 2006 to remuneration paid in the currency of the country of employment to officials serving in third countries.
Treba je upoštevati spremembe življenjskih stroškov v državah zunaj Skupnosti in zato določiti ponderje, ki se od 1. julija 2006 uporabljajo za osebne prejemke uradnikov, začasnega osebja in pogodbenega osebja, ki delajo v tretjih državah, ki se izplačajo v valuti države zaposlitve.
The weightings in respect of which payment has been made on the basis of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 351/2006 [2] may lead to retrospective upward or downward adjustments to remuneration.
Ponderji, ki so se uporabljali za plačilo na podlagi Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 351/2006 [2] imajo lahko za posledico pozitivne ali negativne prilagoditve prejemkov z retroaktivno veljavnostjo.
Provision should be made for back-payments in the event of an increase in remuneration as a result of the new weightings.
Treba bi bilo predvideti naknadno doplačilo, če se zaradi novih ponderjev osebni prejemki zvišajo.
Provision should be made for the recovery of sums overpaid in the event of a reduction in remuneration as a result of the new weightings for the period between 1 July 2006 and the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Treba bi bilo določiti povračilo preveč izplačanih zneskov za obdobje med 1. julijem 2006 in začetkom veljavnosti te uredbe, če se zaradi novih ponderjev osebni prejemki znižajo.
Provision should be made for any such recovery to be restricted to a period of no more than six months preceding the date of entry into force of this Regulation and for its effects to be spread over a period of no more than 12 months following that date, as is the case with the weightings applicable within the European Community to remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants of the European Communities,
Treba bi bilo določiti, da bo morebitno povračilo možno za obdobje največ šestih mesecev pred datumom začetka veljavnosti te uredbe in da se bodo njeni učinki lahko razporedili na obdobje največ dvanajstih mesecev od tega datuma, podobno kot je predvideno za ponderje, ki se uporabljajo znotraj Skupnosti za osebne prejemke in pokojnine uradnikov ter drugih uslužbencev Evropskih skupnosti –