natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, as also mentioned in recital 107, anti-dumping measures should restore a level playing field between the Community industry's sales in the Community market and imports entering the Community market.
Poleg tega, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 107, morajo protidampinški ukrepi obnoviti enake pogoje na trgu Skupnosti med prodajo industrije Skupnosti in uvozom.
Indeed, the purpose of the duties is merely to raise the import prices to a level which would allow the Community industry to achieve a normal profit.
Dejansko je edini namen dajatev dvigniti uvozne cene na raven, ki bi industriji Skupnosti omogočila dosegati normalen dobiček.
It is also noted that despite other possible sources of supply such as Turkey, Japan and India, there is also one exporting producer in the PRC for which dumping was found to be de minimis and these imports will therefore enter the Community market without payment of an anti-dumping duty.
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da je kljub drugim možnim virom dobave, na primer iz Turčije, Japonske in Indije, na voljo še proizvajalec izvoznik iz LRK, za katerega je bil ugotovljeni damping de minimis, zato se bo zadevni uvoz na trg Skupnosti opravljal brez plačila protidampinške dajatve.
Considering the above, the interested Parties' claims in this respect had to be rejected.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega je bilo treba trditve zainteresiranih strank zavrniti.
Relocation of the downstream industry
Selitev industrije na koncu proizvodne verige
One exporting producer in the USA and the two cooperating users alleged that the imposition of the anti-dumping duties would accelerate the relocation process of the downstream industry.
En proizvajalec izvoznik v ZDA in dva sodelujoča uporabnika so trdili, da bi uvedba protidampinških dajatev pospešila selitev industrije na koncu proizvodne verige.
As far as the USA exporter is concerned, they alleged that the product type KMPS constituted a large share of the downstream industry's production cost and therefore any anti-dumping duty would have a significant impact on these industries' profitability.
V zvezi z izvoznikom iz ZDA so trdili, da je izvoz izdelka vrste KMPS pomenil večji del proizvodnih stroškov industrije na koncu proizvodne verige, zato bi protidampinška dajatev imela znaten učinek na donosnost zadevnih industrij.
One of the users alleged that the number of employees in the downstream industry was substantially higher than the number of employees of the Community industry of persulphates, i.e. a much higher number of jobs was at stake.
Eden od uporabnikov je trdil, da je število zaposlenih v industriji na koncu proizvodne verige znatno višje kot število zaposlenih v industriji persulfatov v Skupnosti, s čimer je ogroženo precej višje število delovnih mest.
As mentioned in recitals 112 to 121, the impact of anti-dumping measures on the downstream industries' production cost was found to be negligible.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah od 112 do 121, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je učinek protidampinških ukrepov na proizvodne stroške industrije na koncu proizvodne verige zanemarljiv.
This was true for all product types, including KMPS.
To velja za vse vrste izdelka, vključno s KMPS.
On this basis, it could not be concluded that anti-dumping duties would be a trigger to outsource the production of the downstream industry to third countries.
Na tej podlagi ni bilo mogoče skleniti, da bi protidampinške dajatve sprožile prenos proizvodnje industrije na koncu proizvodne verige na izvajalcev tretjih državah.
It is also noted that the amount of employment in the downstream industry is not directly comparable to the number of employees of the Community industry of persulphates.
Treba je tudi opozoriti, da število zaposlenih v industriji na koncu proizvodne verige ni neposredno primerljivo s številom zaposlenih v industriji persulfatov v Skupnosti.
For instance, the user concerned did not submit any indication or evidence to show how much employment in the downstream industry was directly linked to the product concerned and thus potentially affected by the imposition of anti-dumping duties.
Zadevni uporabnik tako na primer ni predložil nobenega kazalca ali dokaza o obsegu zaposlenih v industriji na koncu proizvodne verige, neposredno povezanih z zadevnim izdelkom, ki bi jih uvedba protidampinških ukrepov potencialno prizadela.
Given the above considerations, these claims had to be rejected.
Ob upoštevanju navedenih premislekov je bilo treba te trditve zavrniti.
Anti-dumping duties imposed in 1995
Protidampinške dajatve, uvedene leta 1995
One of the users claimed that the material injury suffered by the Community industry during the current IP showed that the anti-dumping measures imposed on peroxodisulphates in 1995 were ineffective.
En od uporabnikov je trdil, da je znatna škoda, ki jo je med sedanjim OP utrpela industrija Skupnosti, pokazala, da protidampinški ukrepi, uvedeni leta 1995 na peroksidisulfate, niso bili učinkoviti.
It is therefore not in the interest of the Community to impose new anti-dumping measures on a similar product scope which can also be expected to be ineffective.
Zato ni v interesu Skupnosti, da uvaja nove protidampinške ukrepe na podoben obseg izdelka, za katere se lahko predvideva, da prav tako ne bodo učinkoviti.
In particular, it is not in the Community interest to impose measures which will not be beneficial to the Community industry but will be detrimental to the downstream industry.
Predvsem pa ni v interesu Skupnosti uvajanje ukrepov, ki ne bodo koristili industriji Skupnosti, škodili pa bodo industriji na koncu proizvodne verige.
It should first be noted that the definitive anti-dumping measures to which reference was made were terminated in 2002 [8] due to the withdrawal of the request for an expiry review by the Community industry in accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Najprej je treba opozoriti, da so bili dokončni protidampinški ukrepi, na katere se je sklicevalo, odpravljeni leta 2002 [8] zaradi umika zahtevka za pregled zaradi izteka zadevnih ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
It was found that the continuation of the investigation was not in the Community interest.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da nadaljevanje preiskave ni v interesu Skupnosti.
Since the Community industry was not interested in the continuation of the investigation, it can be reasonably assumed that it was not in an injurious situation and that measures were indeed effective.
Ker industrija Skupnosti ni imela interesa v nadaljevanju preiskave, se lahko predvideva, da škodljivega stanja ni bilo in da so ukrepi dejansko učinkovali.
Second, it was found during the present investigation that the material injury suffered by the Community industry was caused by the dumped imports after the termination of the abovementioned proceeding.
Poleg tega je bilo med sedanjo preiskavo ugotovljeno, da je znatna škoda, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, posledica dampinškega uvoza, opravljenega po zaključku navedenega postopka.
It was therefore concluded that the assumptions made by this user with regard to the effectiveness of the anti-dumping measures were wrong and had to be rejected.
Zato je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bila predvidevanja tega uporabnika glede učinkovitosti protidampinških ukrepov napačna in jih je bilo treba zavrniti.
Furthermore, as concluded in recitals 157 to 160 of the provisional Regulation and as confirmed by the present investigation, the imposition of definitive anti-dumping measures was in the interest of the Community industry, which is expected to benefit from them and to improve its financial situation.
Poleg tega je bilo v uvodnih izjavah od 157 do 160 začasne uredbe ugotovljeno in potrjeno v sedanji preiskavi, da je bila uvedba protidampinških ukrepov v interesu industrije Skupnosti, za katero se pričakuje, da ji bodo koristili ter da bo izboljšala svoje finančno stanje.
On the other hand, as concluded above, the impact of anti-dumping measures on users and importers is expected to be negligible.
Po drugi strani pa je, kot je bilo ugotovljeno zgoraj, pričakovani učinek protidampinških ukrepov na uporabnike in uvoznike zanemarljiv.
Supply chain of downstream product
Dobavna veriga izdelka na koncu proizvodne verige
One of the exporting producers in the USA claimed that since its related producer in the Community is likely to cease its production in the Community, the supply of the disinfectant used in cases of avian influenza could no longer be sufficiently guaranteed.
Eden od proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz ZDA je trdil, da ni mogoče v zadostni meri jamčiti za dobavo dezinfekcijskega sredstva, ki se uporablja za zaščito pred aviarno influenco, ker je verjetno, da bo njegov povezani proizvajalec v Skupnosti prenehal s svojo proizvodnjo v Skupnosti.
Since this product would have to be sourced outside the Community, this would lengthen the supply chain and deteriorate the Community's capability to respond in the event of an outbreak of this disease.
Ker bi bilo treba zato izdelek kupiti zunaj Skupnosti, bi to podaljšalo dobavno verigo in zmanjšalo sposobnost Skupnosti za hiter odziv v primeru izbruha te bolezni.
In this regard, reference is made to the findings in recitals 112 to 120, which show that the financial impact of the anti-dumping duties is estimated to be very low and that therefore it is not very likely that the downstream industry would relocate their production sites as a consequence of the anti-dumping duty, but rather as a consequence of the consolidated negative business result.
V zvezi s tem se sklicuje na ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od 112 do 120, ki kažejo, da je ocenjeni finančni učinek protidampinških dajatev zelo majhen in zato ni zelo verjetno, da bi selitev proizvodnih obratov industrije na koncu proizvodne verige sprožila protidampinška dajatev, verjetneje je, da bi do tega prišlo zaradi združenih negativnih poslovnih rezultatov.
It was also found that the disinfectant produced by this company was not the only one used for disinfection purposes and that therefore, even were the company to cease production in the Community, other products were largely available.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da dezinfekcijsko sredstvo te družbe ni edino, ki se uporablja za te namene, zato bi bili, če ta družba preneha s proizvodnjo v Skupnosti, na voljo še drugi izdelki.
The claims in this regard had therefore to be rejected.
Zadevne trditve je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
Considering the above, the conclusions in recital 167 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed, i.e. that there are no compelling reasons of Community interest to show that the imposition of anti-dumping measures is not in the Community interest.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega se potrdijo sklepne ugotovitve uvodne izjave 167 začasne uredbe, tj. da ni utemeljenih razlogov glede interesa Skupnosti, ki bi kazali, da uvedba protidampinških ukrepov ni v interesu Skupnosti.
Several interested Parties contested the provisional findings that 12 % profit margin would be the profit margin before tax that could be reasonably be achieved by an industry of this type in the sector under normal conditions of competition.
Več zainteresiranih strank je spodbijalo začasne ugotovitve, da bi bila običajna stopnja dobička pred obdavčitvijo, ki bi ga industrija te vrste v sektorju lahko ustvarila v okviru normalnih konkurenčnih pogojev, 12 %.
One exporting producer of the USA claimed that persulphate would be a commodity chemical and that the Community Institutions have a long standing practice to consider 5 to 8 % as appropriate to determine the injury elimination level.
En proizvajalec izvoznik iz ZDA je trdil, da naj bi bil persulfat kemijsko blago in da institucije Skupnosti že dolgo menijo, da je 5–8 % primerna stopnja za določitev stopnje odprave škode.
This exporting producer also claimed that in the previous investigation concerning a similar product, the profit margin considered for this purpose was 5 % which should also be used in the present investigation for consistency reasons.
Poleg tega je ta proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da je bila v prejšnji preiskavi o podobnem izdelku določena stopnja dobička 5 %, kar je treba zaradi usklajenosti upoštevati tudi v sedanji preiskavi.
The same exporting producer alleged that the profit margin of 12 % was not achieved under normal conditions of competition and, therefore, excessive.
Isti proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da je 12-odstotna stopnja dobička pretirana, ker ni bila dosežena pod normalnimi konkurenčnimi pogoji.
It should consequently not be considered.
Zato se je ne sme upoštevati.
The exporting producer supported this claim by providing overall publicly available profitability figures of one of the Community producers, which amounted to 5,1 %.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je to trditev potrdil s predložitvijo javnih podatkov o donosnosti enega od proizvajalcev Skupnosti, ki so znašali 5,1 %.
It was claimed that the profit margin necessary to ensure the viability of the Community industry should be considered or the profit margin which corresponded to a reasonable return on capital employed.
Trdilo se je, da je treba kot stopnjo dobička, potrebno za zagotovitev preživetja industrije Skupnosti, upoštevati stopnjo dobička, ki ustreza običajnemu donosu vloženega kapitala.
It is first noted that the criteria mentioned in recital 149 are irrelevant when determining the injury elimination level.
Najprej je treba opozoriti, da so merila, navedena v uvodni izjavi 149, nepomembna za določanje stopnje odprave škode.
Indeed, the Community institutions have to base their determination on an evaluation as to the level of the profit margin which the Community industry can reasonably expect to achieve in the absence of dumped imports, on the sales of the like product in the Community market.
Dejansko morajo institucije Skupnosti svojo določitev utemeljiti na oceni stopnje dobička, ki bi jo industrija Skupnosti brez dampinškega uvoza običajno lahko ustvarila s prodajo podobnega izdelka na trgu Skupnosti.
In this respect, it is generally considered that the profit margin at the beginning of the period considered is the profit margin realised in the absence of dumped imports.
V zvezi s tem se običajno šteje, da je stopnja dobička na začetku obravnavanega obdobja stopnja dobička, ustvarjenega brez dampinškega uvoza.
It is noted that there is no practice, as claimed by one of the exporting producers in the USA, of the Community institutions to use the same profitability level for similar industries.
Treba je opozoriti, da v nasprotju s trditvijo enega proizvajalca izvoznika iz ZDA, institucije Skupnosti ne uporabljajo enakih stopenj donosnosti za podobne panoge.
Profit margins in order to determine the non-injurious price level in the Community industry are established on actual verified data collected during each investigation and are therefore case specific.
Za določitev neškodljive ravni cen v industriji Skupnosti je bila stopnja dobička določena na podlagi med preiskavo zbranih in dejansko preverjenih podatkov ter je zato vezana na konkreten primer.
For the reasons mentioned above, to use the overall profit margin of one of the Community producers is rejected because it does not relate to the product concerned or the Community market or to the entire Community industry.
Zaradi navedenih razlogov se uporaba celotne stopnje dobička enega od proizvajalcev Skupnosti zavrne, ker ni povezana z zadevnim izdelkom, trgom Skupnosti ali celotno industrijo Skupnosti.
As far as the prior anti-dumping investigation concerning a similar product is concerned and to which reference was made, it is noted that the product type KMPS was not included in that investigation, which may have had an impact on the overall profitability of the Community industry.
V zvezi s sklicevanjem na prejšnjo protidampinško preiskavo glede podobnega izdelka, je treba opozoriti, da izdelek vrste KMPS v to preiskavo ni bil vključen, kar je lahko vplivalo na celotno donosnost industrije Skupnosti.
Finally, as far as the alleged uncompetitive behaviour of the Community industry is concerned, it is noted that as outlined in recitals 124 to 130, these allegations were not confirmed in the current investigation and the claims in this regard had to be rejected.
V zvezi z domnevnim nekonkurenčnim vedenjem industrije Skupnosti je treba opozoriti, kot je poudarjeno v uvodnih izjavah od 124 do 130, da sedanja preiskava teh trditev ni potrdila, zato jih je bilo treba zavrniti.
It is therefore concluded that the profitability of 12 % was appropriate and was used in the definitive findings.
Zato je sklenjeno, da je bila 12 % dobičkonosnost ustrezna in je bila uporabljena v dokončnih ugotovitvah.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the injury elimination level, recitals 168 to 171 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb v zvezi s stopnjo odprave škode, se uvodne izjave od 168 do 171 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Therefore, they reflect the situation found during that investigation with respect to these companies.
Zato odražajo stanje teh družb med preiskavo.
These duty rates (as opposed to the country-wide duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of products originating in the countries concerned and produced by the companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Te stopnje dajatve (v nasprotju z dajatvijo za celotno državo, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“) se tako uporabljajo izključno za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz zadevnih držav, ki jih proizvedejo družbe in torej posamezne navedene pravne osebe.
Imported products produced by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation with its name and address, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and shall be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Za uvožene izdelke, ki jih proizvaja katera koli druga družba, ki ni posebej navedena z imenom in naslovom v izvedbenem delu te uredbe, vključno s subjekti, povezanimi s tistimi, ki so izrecno navedene, ne veljajo te stopnje, temveč stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual company anti-dumping duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [9] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company's activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for example, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo teh stopenj protidampinške dajatve za posamezne družbe (npr. zaradi spremembe imena družbe ali zaradi ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov) je treba nemudoma vložiti pri Komisiji [9] skupaj z vsemi potrebnimi informacijami, zlasti pa vsaka sprememba dejavnosti družbe, povezane s proizvodnjo, domačo prodajo in prodajo na tujem, ki je na primer povezana s to spremembo imena ali spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov.
However, the latter companies are invited, when they fulfil the requirements of the second subparagraph Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation, to present a request for a review pursuant to that Article in order to have their situation examined individually.
Slednje so pozvane, da potem, ko izpolnijo zahteve iz drugega pododstavka člena 11(4) osnovne uredbe, predložijo zahtevek za pregled v skladu z navedenim členom, da se njihovo stanje individualno preuči.
In view of the magnitude of the dumping margins found and in the light of the level of the injury caused to the Community industry, it is considered necessary that the amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty, imposed by the provisional Regulation, i.e. Regulation (EC) No 390/2007, should be definitively collected to the extent of the amount of the definitive duties imposed.
Glede na višino ugotovljenih stopenj dampinga in glede na stopnjo škode, povzročene industriji Skupnosti, se šteje, da je treba zneske, zavarovane z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo, uvedeno z začasno uredbo, tj. Uredbo (ES) št. 390/2007, dokončno pobrati v višini zneska uvedenih dokončnih dajatev.
Where the definitive duties are higher than the provisional duties, only the amounts secured at the level of the provisional duties shall be definitely collected.
Če so dokončne dajatve višje od začasnih, se dokončno poberejo samo zneski, zavarovani na stopnji začasnih dajatev.
These special measures, which only apply to companies for which an individual duty rate is introduced, include the presentation to the customs authorities of the Member States of a valid commercial invoice, which shall conform to the requirements set out in the Annex.
Ti posebni ukrepi, ki veljajo samo za družbe, za katere je uvedena individualna dajatev, vključujejo predložitev veljavne trgovske fakture carinskim organom držav članic, ki je skladna z zahtevami, navedenimi v Prilogi.
Imports not accompanied by such an invoice shall be made subject to the residual anti-dumping duty applicable to all other exporters.
Za uvoz, ki ga taka faktura ne spremlja, velja protidampinška dajatev, ki se uporablja za vse druge izvoznike.
It is recalled that should the exports by the companies benefiting from lower individual duty rates increase significantly in volume after the imposition of the anti-dumping measures, such increase could be considered as constituting in itself a change in the pattern of trade due to the imposition of measures within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation.
Če se bo po uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov znatno povečal obseg izvoza družb, za katere veljajo nižje individualne stopnje dajatve, se bo takšno povečanje obravnavalo kot sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja, nastala zaradi uvedbe ukrepov v smislu člena 13(1) osnovne uredbe.
This investigation may, inter alia, examine the need for the removal of individual duty rates and the consequent imposition of a country-wide duty,
S to preiskavo se lahko med drugim prouči potreba po odpravi individualnih stopenj dajatve in posledično uvedba dajatve na ravni države –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of peroxosulphates (persulphates), including potassium peroxymonosulphate sulphate, falling within CN codes 28334000 and ex28429080 (TARIC code 2842908020) and originating in the USA, the PRC and Taiwan.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz peroksisulfatov (persulfatov), vključno s kalijevim peroksimonosulfatom, uvrščenih pod oznaki KN 28334000 in ex28429080 (oznaka TARIC 2842908020) in s poreklom iz ZDA, LRK in Tajvana.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, of the products manufactured by the companies listed below shall be as follows:
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti, pred plačilom dajatve za izdelke, ki jih proizvajajo spodaj naštete družbe, je:
Amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duties pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 390/2007 on imports of peroxosulphates (persulphates), including potassium peroxymonosulphate sulphate, falling within CN codes 28334000 and ex28429080 (TARIC code 2842908020) and originating in the USA, the PRC and Taiwan shall be definitively collected.
Zneski, zavarovani z začasnimi protidampinškimi dajatvami, iz Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 390/2007 na uvoz peroksisulfatov (persulfatov), vključno s kalijevim peroksimonosulfatom, uvrščenih pod oznaki KN 28334000 in ex28429080 (oznaka TARIC 2842908020) in s poreklom iz ZDA, LRK in Tajvana, se dokončno poberejo.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2117/2005 (OJ L 340, 23.12.2005, p. 17).
Uredba, kakor je nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 2117/2005 (UL L 340, 23.12.2005, str. 17).
OJ L 97, 12.4.2007, p. 6.
UL L 97, 12.4.2007, str. 6.
OJ L 308, 21.12.1995, p. 61.
UL L 308, 21.12.1995, str. 61.