natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Decision as amended by Decision 2007/522/EC (OJ L 193, 25.7.2007, p. 23).
Odločba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo 2007/522/ES (UL L 193, 25.7.2007, str. 23).
denouncing, on behalf of the Community, the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of India on cane sugar
o odpovedi, v imenu Skupnosti, Sporazuma med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Republiko Indijo o trsnem sladkorju
Under the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of India on cane sugar (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’), approved by Council Decision 75/456/EEC [1], the Community undertakes to purchase and import, at guaranteed prices, a specific quantity of cane sugar, raw or white, which originates in India and which India undertakes to deliver to the Community.
V skladu s Sporazumom med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Republiko Indijo o trsnem sladkorju (v nadaljevanju „Sporazum“), odobrenim s Sklepom Sveta 75/456/EGS [1], se Skupnost obvezuje, da bo po zajamčenih cenah kupovala in uvažala določeno količino surovega ali belega trsnega sladkorja s poreklom iz Indije, za katerega se Indija obvezuje, da ga bo dobavljala Skupnosti.
Article 11 of the Agreement provides that either party may denounce the Agreement after giving to the other party two years' notice in writing to that effect.
Člen 11 Sporazuma določa možnost, da lahko vsaka pogodbenica Sporazum pisno odpove z dveletnim odpovednim rokom.
With the end of intervention in the reformed common market organisation for sugar, internal sugar prices will no longer be guaranteed by intervention buying.
Notranje cene sladkorja ob koncu intervencije z reformirano skupno ureditvijo trga za sladkor ne bodo več zajamčene z intervencijskim odkupom.
It is consistent to terminate the system of guaranteed prices for sugar imported under the Agreement.
Primerno je, da se prekine sistem zajamčenih cen sladkorja, uvoženega na podlagi Sporazuma.
It is therefore necessary to denounce the Agreement in accordance with Article 11 thereof, and to notify India as signatory to the Agreement of such denunciation,
Zato je treba odpovedati Sporazum v skladu z njegovim členom 11 in o tem obvestiti Indijo kot podpisnico Sporazuma –
The Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of India on cane sugar, signed on 18 July 1975, is hereby denounced on behalf of the Community with effect from 1 October 2009.
Sporazum med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Republiko Indijo o trsnem sladkorju, podpisan 18. julija 1975, se odpove v imenu Skupnosti, odpoved pa začne veljati 1. oktobra 2009.
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to notify the Government of India of the denunciation of the said Agreement.
Predsednik Sveta je pooblaščen, da imenuje osebo(-e), ki je (so) pooblaščena(-e), da vlado Indije obvesti(-jo) o odpovedi omenjenega Sporazuma.
OJ L 190, 23.7.1975, p. 35.
UL L 190, 23.7.1975, str. 35.
denouncing on behalf of the Community Protocol 3 on ACP sugar appearing in the ACP-EEC Convention of Lomé and the corresponding declarations annexed to that Convention, contained in Protocol 3 attached to Annex V to the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement, with respect to Barbados, Belize, the Republic of Congo, the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire, the Republic of the Fiji Islands, the Republic of Guyana, Jamaica, the Republic of Kenya, the Republic of Madagascar, the Republic of Malawi, the Republic of Mauritius, the Republic of Mozambique, the Federation of Saint Kitts and Nevis, the Republic of Suriname, the Kingdom of Swaziland, the United Republic of Tanzania, the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, the Republic of Uganda, the Republic of Zambia and the Republic of Zimbabwe
o odpovedi v imenu Skupnosti Protokola št. 3 o sladkorju iz AKP v Konvenciji AKP-EGS iz Loméja in ustreznih izjav, priloženih k tej konvenciji v Protokolu št. 3, dodanemu Prilogi V k Sporazumu o partnerstvu AKP-ES za Barbados, Belize, Republiko Fidžijske otoke, Republiko Gvajano, Jamajko, Republiko Kenijo, Republiko Kongo, Republiko Madagaskar, Republiko Malavi, Republiko Mauritius, Republiko Mozambik, Federacijo Saint Kitts in Nevis, Republiko Slonokoščeno obalo, Republiko Surinam, Kraljevino Svazi, Združeno republiko Tanzanijo, Republiko Trinidad in Tobago, Republiko Ugando, Republiko Zambijo in Republiko Zimbabve
Under Protocol 3 on ACP sugar appearing in the ACP-EEC Convention of Lomé signed on 28 February 1975 and the corresponding declarations annexed to that Convention (Sugar Protocol), contained in Protocol 3 attached to Annex V to the Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000 (ACP-EC Partnership Agreement) [1], the Community undertakes to purchase and import, at guaranteed prices, specific quantities of cane sugar, raw or white, which originate in the signatory ACP States and which those States undertake to deliver to the Community.
Na podlagi Protokola št. 3 o sladkorju iz AKP v Konvenciji AKP-EGS iz Loméja, podpisani 28. februarja 1975, in ustreznih izjav, priloženih k tej konvenciji („Protokol o sladkorju“) v Protokolu št. 3, dodanemu Prilogi V k Sporazumu o partnerstvu med članicami skupine afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi, podpisanemu v Cotonouju dne 23. junija 2000 („Sporazum o partnerstvu AKP-ES“) [1], se Skupnost zavezuje, da bo po zajamčenih cenah kupovala in uvažala določene količine surovega ali belega trsnega sladkorja s poreklom iz držav podpisnic AKP, za katerega se te države obvezujejo, da ga bodo dobavljale Skupnosti.
The Sugar Protocol provides that the Protocol may be denounced by the Community with respect to each ACP State and by each ACP State with respect to the Community, subject to two years' notice.
Protokol o sladkorju določa možnost, da lahko Skupnost odpove Protokol v zvezi s posamezno državo AKP, posamezna država AKP pa ga lahko odpove v zvezi s Skupnostjo, z dveletnim odpovednim rokom.
The current trade provisions applicable to the ACP States, set out in Annex V to the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement, expire on 31 December 2007.
Sedanje trgovinske določbe iz Priloge V k Sporazumu o partnerstvu AKP-ES, ki veljajo za države AKP, prenehajo veljati 31. decembra 2007.
In accordance with Article 36 of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement, the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) will provide the new legal framework for trade with ACP States and will replace the trade regime of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement.
V skladu s členom 36 Sporazuma o partnerstvu AKP-ES bodo sporazumi o gospodarskem partnerstvu zagotovili nov pravni okvir za trgovino z državami AKP in nadomestili trgovinsko ureditev iz Sporazuma o partnerstvu AKP-ES.
Article 36(4) of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement requires the parties to review the Sugar Protocol in the context of EPA negotiations.
Na podlagi člena 36(4) Sporazuma o partnerstvu AKP-ES morajo podpisnice preučiti Protokol o sladkorju v okviru pogajanj glede sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu.
The waiver from the Community's obligations under Article I of the GATT with regard to the trade preferences to ACP States under ACP-EC Partnership Agreement, granted by the WTO Ministerial Conference in Doha on 14 November 2001, also expires on 31 December 2007.
Oprostitev obveznosti Skupnosti v skladu s členom I GATT glede trgovinskih preferencialov za države AKP na podlagi Sporazuma o partnerstvu AKP-ES, odobrena na ministrski konferenci STO v Dohi 14. novembra 2001, prav tako preneha veljati 31. decembra 2007.
In order to ensure that the import regime for sugar is included in the import regime envisaged by EPAs, it is appropriate to take all necessary steps to ensure the termination of the Sugar Protocol and any commitments contained therein at a sufficiently early stage in view of the two years' notice requirement under the Sugar Protocol.
Za zagotovitev, da se uvozna ureditev za sladkor vključi v uvozno ureditev, predvideno s sporazumi o gospodarskem partnerstvu, je primerno, da se sprejmejo vsi potrebni ukrepi za prekinitev veljavnosti Protokola o sladkorju in vseh njegovih obveznosti dovolj zgodaj ob upoštevanju dveletnega odpovednega roka iz člena 10 Protokola o sladkorju.
The arrangements of the Sugar Protocol have served the interests of both the ACP States and the Community, by guaranteeing ACP exporters an outlet to a profitable market and ensuring a regular supply for Community cane sugar refiners.
Ureditve Protokola o sladkorju so bile v interesu tako držav AKP kot Skupnosti, saj so izvoznikom AKP zagotavljala prodajne možnosti na dobičkonosnem trgu, Skupnosti pa redno dobavo za rafinerije trsnega sladkorja.
However, the arrangements of the Sugar Protocol can no longer be maintained.
Vendar pa rešitev iz Protokola o sladkorju ni več mogoče ohraniti.
In the context of a reformed Community sugar market, the Community will cease to guarantee prices to European sugar producers as the former mechanism of intervention is being phased out.
Zaradi reformiranega trga s sladkorjem v Skupnosti in torej postopne ukinitve nekdanjega intervencijskega mehanizma, Skupnost ne bo več jamčila cen evropskim proizvajalcem sladkorja.
In the context of a transition towards liberalisation of ACP-EC trade, unlimited quantities cannot coexist with the price and volume guarantees of the Sugar Protocol.
V kontekstu prehoda k liberalizaciji trgovine med AKP-ES, neomejene količine niso združljive z jamstvom cen in količin, kakor določa Protokol o sladkorju.
As regards least developed countries, unlimited access for sugar is scheduled under the Everything But Arms (EBA) initiative as from 1 July 2009.
Glede najmanj razvitih držav je neomejen dostop za sladkor načrtovan v okviru pobude „vse razen orožja“ (everything but arms „EBA“), in sicer od 1. julija 2009.
Since the beginning of the second phase of the transition period is foreseen on 1 October 2009 the EBA sugar regime should be adjusted accordingly.
Ker je začetek druge stopnje prehodnega obdobja predviden s 1. oktobrom 2009, je treba ureditev za sladkor iz EBA ustrezno prilagoditi.
Denunciation does not prejudge a subsequent mutual agreement between the Community and the ACP States on the treatment of sugar in the context of comprehensive EPAs.
Z odpovedjo Protokola ni vnaprej določen poznejši sporazumni dogovor med Skupnostjo in državami AKP o obravnavi sladkorja v okviru splošnih sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu.
It is therefore necessary to denounce the Sugar Protocol in accordance with Article 10 thereof, and to notify each ACP State signatory to the Sugar Protocol of such denunciation,
Zato je treba odpovedati Protokol o sladkorju v skladu s členom 10 Protokola in vsako državo AKP, ki je podpisnica Protokola o sladkorju, o tem obvestiti –
Protocol 3 on ACP Sugar appearing in the ACP-EEC Convention of Lomé signed on 28 February 1975 and the corresponding declarations annexed to that Convention, contained in Protocol 3 attached to Annex V to the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000, is hereby denounced on behalf of the Community with effect from 1 October 2009 with respect to Barbados, Belize, the Republic of Congo, the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire, the Republic of the Fiji Islands, the Republic of Guyana, Jamaica, the Republic of Kenya, the Republic of Madagascar, the Republic of Malawi, the Republic of Mauritius, the Republic of Mozambique, the Federation of Saint Kitts and Nevis, the Republic of Suriname, the Kingdom of Swaziland, the United Republic of Tanzania, the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, the Republic of Uganda, the Republic of Zambia and the Republic of Zimbabwe.
Protokol št. 3 o sladkorju AKP v Konvenciji AKP-EGS iz Loméja, podpisani 28. februarja 1975, in ustrezne izjave, priložene k tej konvenciji v Protokolu št. 3, dodanemu Prilogi V k Sporazumu o partnerstvu AKP-ES, podpisanemu v Cotonouju 23. junija 2000, se v imenu Skupnosti odpovejo učinkom od 1. oktobra 2009 za Barbados, Belize, Republiko Fidžijske otoke, Republiko Gvajano, Jamajko, Republiko Kenijo, Republiko Kongo, Republiko Madagaskar, Republiko Malavi, Republiko Mauritius, Republiko Mozambik, Federacijo Saint Kitts in Nevis, Republiko Slonokoščeno obalo, Republiko Surinam, Kraljevino Svazi, Združeno republiko Tanzanijo, Republiko Trinidad in Tobago, Republiko Ugando, Republiko Zambijo in Republiko Zimbabve.
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to notify the Governments of Barbados, Belize, the Republic of Congo, the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire, the Republic of the Fiji Islands, the Republic of Guyana, Jamaica, the Republic of Kenya, the Republic of Madagascar, the Republic of Malawi, the Republic of Mauritius, the Republic of Mozambique, the Federation of Saint Kitts and Nevis, the Republic of Suriname, the Kingdom of Swaziland, the United Republic of Tanzania, the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, the Republic of Uganda, the Republic of Zambia and the Republic of Zimbabwe of the denunciation of the said Protocol.
Predsednik Sveta se pooblasti, da imenuje osebo(-e), pooblaščeno(-e), da vlade Barbadosa, Belizeja, Republike Fidžijskih otokov, Republike Gvajane, Jamajke, Republike Kenije, Republike Konga, Republike Madagaskarja, Republike Malavija, Republike Mauritiusa, Republike Mozambika, Federacije Saint Kittsa in Nevisa, Republike Slonokoščene obale, Republike Surinama, Kraljevine Svazija, Združene republike Tanzanije, Republike Trinidada in Tobaga, Republike Ugande, Republike Zambije in Republike Zimbabveja obvesti(-jo) o odpovedi Protokola.
OJ L 317, 15.12.2000, p. 3, revised in Luxembourg on 25 June 2005 (OJ L 287, 28.10.2005, p. 4).
UL L 317, 15.12.2000, str. 3, revidiran v Luxembourgu dne 25. junija 2005 (UL L 287, 28.10.2005, str. 4).
of 19 September 2007
z dne 19. septembra 2007
concerning the non-inclusion of methomyl in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance
o nevključitvi metomila v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o preklicu registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo navedeno snov
(notified under document number C(2007) 4258)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 4258)
That list includes methomyl.
Navedeni seznam vključuje metomil.
For methomyl the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed in accordance with the provisions laid down in Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 and (EC) No 703/2001 for a range of uses proposed by the notifier.
Vplivi metomila na zdravje ljudi in okolje so bili ocenjeni v skladu z določbami uredb (ES) št. 451/2000 in (ES) št. 703/2001 za vrste uporab, ki jih je predlagal prijavitelj.
For methomyl the rapporteur Member State was the United Kingdom and all relevant information was submitted on 3 May 2004.
Država članica poročevalka za metomil je bilo Združeno kraljestvo, vse ustrezne informacije pa so bile predložene 3. maja 2004.
The assessment report was peer reviewed by the Member States and the EFSA and presented to the Commission on 23 June 2006 in the format of the EFSA conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance methomyl [4].
Poročilo o oceni so pregledali strokovnjaki držav članic in EFSA ter ga 23. junija 2006 predložili Komisiji v obliki sklepa EFSA o strokovnem pregledu ocene tveganja pesticidov z aktivno snovjo metomil [4].
This report was reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health.
To poročilo so države članice in Komisija pregledale v okviru Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali.
In particular, based on the available information, the operator exposure would exceed the AOEL (acceptable operator exposure level) and it has not been demonstrated that the worker and bystander exposure is acceptable.
Na podlagi razpoložljivih podatkov bi izpostavljenost izvajalca tretiranja presegala AOEL (sprejemljiva raven izpostavljenosti izvajalca tretiranja), izpostavljenost delavcev in drugih navzočih oseb pa se tudi ni izkazala za sprejemljivo.
Moreover, with regard to ecotoxicology, there are concerns due to a high risk for birds and mammals, aquatic organisms, bees and non-target arthropods.
Poleg tega se pojavljajo še pomisleki v zvezi z ekotoksikologijo zaradi visokega tveganja pri pticah in sesalcih, vodnih organizmih, čebelah in neciljnih členonožcih.
However, despite the arguments advanced, the above concerns remained unsolved, and assessments made on the basis of the information submitted and evaluated during the EFSA expert meetings have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing methomyl satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Toda kljub predloženim argumentom se navedenih pomislekov ni dalo odpraviti, po ocenah na podlagi predloženih informacij, preučenih na srečanjih strokovnjakov EFSA, pa ne kaže pričakovati, da bi lahko fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo metomil, pod predvidenimi pogoji uporabe na splošno izpolnjevala zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
Methomyl should therefore not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Metomil se zato ne sme vključiti v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Measures should be taken to ensure that authorisations granted for plant protection products containing methomyl are withdrawn within a fixed period of time and are not renewed and that no new authorisations for such products are granted.
Sprejeti je treba ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo metomil, prekličejo v predpisanem roku in se ne podaljšajo ali izdajo nove registracije takih sredstev.
Any period of grace granted by a Member State for the disposal, storage, placing on the market and use of existing stocks of plant protection products containing methomyl, should be limited to 12 months in order to allow existing stocks to be used in one further growing season, which ensures that plant protection products containing methomyl remain available to farmers for 18 months from the adoption of this Decision.
Če države članice odobrijo podaljšanje roka za odstranjevanje, skladiščenje, dajanje v promet in uporabo obstoječih zalog fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo metomil, ga je treba omejiti na obdobje dvanajstih mesecev, da se omogoči uporaba obstoječih zalog v naslednji rastni sezoni, kar zagotavlja, da so fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo metomil, na voljo kmetom 18 mesecev od sprejetja navedene odločbe.
This Decision does not prejudice the submission of an application for methomyl according to the provisions of Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC in view of a possible inclusion in its Annex I.
Ta odločba ne vpliva na predložitev zahtevka za metomil v skladu z določbami člena 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS zaradi morebitne uvrstitve v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi.
The Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health did not deliver an opinion within the time-limit laid down by its Chairman and the Commission therefore submitted to the Council a proposal relating to these measures.
Stalni odbor za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ni dal mnenja v roku, ki ga je določil njegov predsednik in zato je Komisija predložila Svetu predlog v zvezi s temi ukrepi.
Methomyl shall not be included as an active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Metomil se ne vključi kot aktivna snov v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
authorisations for plant protection products containing methomyl are withdrawn by 19 March 2008;
se registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo metomil, prekličejo do 19. marca 2008;
no authorisations for plant protection products containing methomyl are granted or renewed from the date of publication of this Decision.
se od datuma objave te odločbe nobene registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo metomil, ne odobrijo ali podaljšajo.
Any period of grace granted by Member States in accordance with the provisions of Article 4(6) of Directive 91/414/EEC, shall be as short as possible and shall expire on 19 March 2009.
Morebitno podaljšanje roka, ki ga odobrijo države članice v skladu z določbami člena 4(6) Direktive 91/414/EGS, je čim krajše in traja največ do 19. marca 2009.
Done at Brussels, 19 September 2007.
V Bruslju, 19. septembra 2007
concerning the non-inclusion of trifluralin in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance
o nevključitvi trifluralina v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o preklicu registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo navedeno snov
(notified under document number C(2007) 4282)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 4282)
That list includes trifluralin.
Navedeni seznam vključuje trifluralin.
For trifluralin the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed in accordance with the provisions laid down in Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 and (EC) No 703/2001 for a range of uses proposed by the notifiers.
Vplivi trifluralina na zdravje ljudi in okolje so bili ocenjeni v skladu z določbami uredb (ES) št. 451/2000 in (ES) št. 703/2001 za vrste uporab, ki jih je predlagal prijavitelj.
For trifluralin the rapporteur Member State was Greece and all relevant information was submitted on 11 July 2003.
Država članica poročevalka za trifluralin je bila Grčija, vse ustrezne informacije pa so bile predložene 11. julija 2003.
The assessment report has been peer reviewed by the Member States and the EFSA within its Working Group Evaluation and presented to the Commission on 14 March 2005 in the format of the EFSA conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance trifluralin [4].
Poročilo o oceni so v okviru delovne skupine za ocenjevanje pregledali strokovnjaki držav članic in EFSA ter ga 14. marca 2005 predložili Komisiji v obliki sklepa EFSA o strokovnem pregledu ocene tveganja pesticidov z aktivno snovjo trifluralin [4].
This report has been reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 16 March 2007 in the format of the Commission review report for trifluralin.
To poročilo so države članice in Komisija pregledale v okviru Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter končno različico pripravile 16. marca 2007 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu glede trifluralina.
Trifluralin is of high toxicity to aquatic organisms, in particular fish.
Trifluralin je toksičen za vodne organizme, zlasti ribe.
It is also highly persistent in soil and not readily biodegradable.
Poleg tega je zelo obstojen v zemlji in težko biološko razgradljiv.
Moreover, it shows potential for accumulation.
Obstaja tveganje za akumulacijo.
In particular, it exceeds significantly the maximum bioconcentration factor (BCF) laid down in Directive 91/414/EEC for aquatic organisms, indicating a potential for bioaccumulation in such organisms.
Predvsem pa bistveno presega najvišji biokoncentracijski faktor (BCF) iz Direktive 91/414/EGS za vodne organizme, ki označuje možnost biološke akumulacije v takšnih organizmih.
Due to its high volatility, transport through air cannot be excluded and, despite a rapid photochemical degradation, monitoring programmes have shown migration to places distant from application.
Zaradi visoke hlapnosti ni mogoče izključiti prenosa po zraku, s programi nadzora pa je bil kljub hitri fotokemični razgradnji dokazan prenos na kraje, oddaljene od mesta uporabe.
These concerns made it appear that trifluralin does not meet the criteria for inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Iz teh pomislekov izhaja, da trifluralin ne izpolnjuje meril za vključitev v Prilogo I k direktivi 91/414/EGS.