natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to verify or calculate if the recycling and recovery targets set in European Parliament and Council Directive 94/62/EC of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste [12], Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of life vehicles [13], Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) [14] and Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators [15] as well as other relevant Community legislation are met, the amounts of waste which have ceased to be waste should be accounted for as recycled and recovered waste when the recycling or recovery requirements of that legislation are satisfied.
Za ugotovitev ali izračun ali so izpolnjeni cilji recikliranja in predelave iz Direktive 94/62/ES Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 1994 o embalaži in odpadni embalaži [12], Direktive 2000/53/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. septembra 2000 o izrabljenih vozilih [13], Direktive 2002/96/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. januarja 2003 o odpadni električni in elektronski opremi (OEEO) [14], Direktive 2006/66/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. septembra 2006 o baterijah in akumulatorjih ter odpadnih baterijah in akumulatorjih [15] ter druge ustrezne zakonodaje Skupnosti, bi bilo treba količine odpadkov, ki prenehajo biti odpadki, obravnavati kot reciklirane in predelane odpadke, kadar so izpolnjene zahteve te zakonodaje glede recikliranja ali predelave.
On the basis of the definition of waste, in order to promote certainty and consistency, the Commission may adopt guidelines to specify in certain cases when substances or objects become waste.
Na podlagi opredelitve odpadka lahko Komisija sprejme smernice, da bi se v določenih primerih pojasnilo, kdaj snov ali predmet postane odpadek, s čimer bi se spodbujali varnost in skladnost.
Such guidelines may be developed inter alia for electrical and electronic equipment and vehicles.
Take smernice se lahko med drugim pripravijo za električno in elektronsko opremo in vozila.
It is appropriate that costs be allocated in such a way as to reflect the real costs to the environment of the generation and management of waste.
Primerno je, da se stroški razporedijo tako, da odražajo dejanske stroške, ki bremenijo okolje zaradi nastajanja odpadkov in ravnanja z njimi.
The polluter-pays principle is a guiding principle at European and international levels.
Načelo, da plača povzročitelj obremenitve, je vodilno načelo na evropski in mednarodni ravni.
The waste producer and the waste holder should manage the waste in a way that guarantees a high level of protection of the environment and human health.
Povzročitelj in imetnik odpadkov bi morala z odpadki ravnati na način, ki zagotavlja visoko raven varstva okolja in zdravja ljudi.
The introduction of extended producer responsibility in this Directive is one of the means to support the design and production of goods which take into full account and facilitate the efficient use of resources during their whole life-cycle including their repair, re-use, disassembly and recycling without compromising the free circulation of goods on the internal market.
Uvedba razširjene odgovornosti proizvajalca v tej direktivi predstavlja enega od načinov oblikovanja in proizvodnje blaga, ki v celoti upošteva in poenostavlja učinkovito uporabo virov v njihovem celotnem življenjskem krogu, vključno z njegovim popravilom, ponovno uporabo, razgradnjo in recikliranjem, ne da bi bil pri tem ogrožen prost pretok blaga na notranjem trgu.
This Directive should help move the EU closer to a ‘recycling society’, seeking to avoid waste generation and to use waste as a resource.
Ta direktiva bi morala pomagati EU, da se približa „družbi recikliranja“, ki se poskuša izogibati nastajanju odpadkov in uporabljati odpadke kot vir.
In particular, the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme calls for measures aimed at ensuring the source separation, collection and recycling of priority waste streams.
K ukrepom za zagotavljanje ločevanja pri viru, zbiranja in recikliranja prednostnih tokov odpadkov poziva zlasti šesti okoljski akcijski program Skupnosti.
In line with that objective and as a means to facilitating or improving its recovery potential, waste should be separately collected if technically, environmentally and economically practicable, before undergoing recovery operations that deliver the best overall environmental outcome.
V skladu s tem ciljem in kot sredstvo za poenostavitev ali izboljšanje možnosti za predelavo bi bilo treba odpadke, preden se dajo v postopke predelave, ki skupaj zagotavljajo najboljši izid za okolje, zbirati ločeno, če je to tehnično in okoljsko izvedljivo in ne povzroča prevelikih stroškov.
Member States should encourage the separation of hazardous compounds from waste streams if necessary to achieve environmentally sound management.
Države članice bi morale spodbujati ločevanje nevarnih sestavin iz tokov odpadkov, če je to potrebno za okolju prijazno ravnanje z njimi.
Member States should support the use of recyclates, such as recovered paper, in line with the waste hierarchy and with the aim of a recycling society, and should not support the landfilling or incineration of such recyclates whenever possible.
Države članice bi morale podpirati uporabo recikliranih materialov, kot je predelan papir, v skladu s hierarhijo ravnanja z odpadki in ciljem oblikovanja družbe recikliranja in, če je le mogoče, ne bi smele podpirati njihovega odlaganja ali sežiganja.
In order to implement the precautionary principle and the principle of preventive action enshrined in Article 174(2) of the Treaty, it is necessary to set general environmental objectives for the management of waste within the Community.
Zaradi izvajanja previdnostnega načela in načela, da je treba delovati preventivno iz člena 174(2) Pogodbe, je treba določiti splošne okoljske cilje za ravnanje z odpadki znotraj Skupnosti.
By virtue of those principles, it is for the Community and the Member States to establish a framework to prevent, reduce and, in so far as is possible, eliminate from the outset the sources of pollution or nuisance by adopting measures whereby recognised risks are eliminated.
Na podlagi teh načel bi morale Skupnost in države članice vzpostaviti okvir za preprečevanje, zmanjševanje in, kolikor je mogoče, odpravljanje virov onesnaževanja ali škodljivih vplivov že od samega začetka, in sicer s sprejetjem takšnih ukrepov, s katerimi bi odpravili prepoznana tveganja.
The waste hierarchy generally lays down a priority order of what constitutes the best overall environmental option in waste legislation and policy, while departing from such hierarchy may be necessary for specific waste streams when justified for reasons of, inter alia, technical feasibility, economic viability and environmental protection.
S hierarhijo ravnanja z odpadki se na splošno pripravi prednostni vrstni red tistega, kar predstavlja najboljšo celovito možnost za okolje v okviru zakonodaje in politike o odpadkih, vendar pa je za določene tokove odpadkov včasih treba odstopati od te hierarhije, med drugim zaradi tehnične izvedljivosti in ekonomske smiselnosti ter varstva okolja.
It is necessary, in order to enable the Community as a whole to become self-sufficient in waste disposal and in the recovery of mixed municipal waste collected from private households and to enable the Member States to move towards that aim individually, to make provision for a network of cooperation as regards disposal installations and installations for the recovery of mixed municipal waste collected from private households, taking into account geographical circumstances and the need for specialised installations for certain types of waste.
Da bi zagotovili samostojnost celotne Skupnosti pri odstranjevanju odpadkov in predelavi mešanih komunalnih odpadkov, zbranih iz zasebnih gospodinjstev, državam članicam pa omogočila individualna izpolnitev tega cilja, je treba zagotoviti mrežo sodelovanja v zvezi z napravami za odstranjevanje in napravami za predelavo mešanih komunalnih odpadkov, zbranih iz zasebnih gospodinjstev, pri tem pa upoštevati geografske okoliščine in potrebo po specializiranih napravah za nekatere vrste odpadkov.
For the purposes of applying Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 on shipments of waste [16], mixed municipal waste as referred to in Article 3(5) of that Regulation remains mixed municipal waste even when it has been subject to a waste treatment operation that has not substantially altered its properties.
Za namene uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 1013/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 14. junija 2006 o pošiljkah odpadkov [16] so mešani komunalni odpadki iz člena 3(5) navedene uredbe še vedno mešani komunalni odpadki tudi po postopku obdelave odpadkov, ki njihovih lastnosti ni bistveno spremenil.
It is important that hazardous waste be labelled in accordance with international and Community standards.
Pomembno je, da so nevarni odpadki označeni v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi in standardi Skupnosti.
However, where such waste is collected separately from households, this should not result in householders being obliged to complete the requisite documentation.
Če se odpadki te vrste zbirajo ločeno iz gospodinjstev, to ne sme pomeniti, da so gospodinjstva obvezana izpolniti zahtevano dokumentacijo.
It is important, in accordance with the waste hierarchy, and for the purpose of reduction of greenhouse gas emissions originating from waste disposal on landfills, to facilitate the separate collection and proper treatment of bio-waste in order to produce environmentally safe compost and other bio-waste based materials.
Pomembno je, da se v skladu s hierarhijo ravnanja z odpadki in zaradi zmanjšanja emisije toplogrednih plinov, ki je posledica odlaganja odpadkov na odlagališčih, olajša ločeno zbiranje in ustrezna obdelava bioloških odpadkov, da bi proizvedli okoljsko varen kompost in druge materiale iz bioloških odpadkov.
The Commission, after an assessment on the management of bio-waste, will submit proposals for legislative measures, if appropriate.
Komisija bo po oceni ravnanja z biološkimi odpadki po potrebi predložila predlog za zakonodajne ukrepe.
Technical minimum standards concerning waste treatment activities not covered by Directive 96/61/EC may be adopted where there is evidence that a benefit would be gained in terms of protecting human health and the environment and where a coordinated approach to the implementation of this Directive would ensure the protection of human health and the environment.
Sprejmejo se lahko tehnični minimalni standardi za dejavnosti obdelave odpadkov, ki niso zajeti v Direktivi 96/61/ES, če se izkaže, da bi bilo to koristno z vidika varstva zdravja ljudi in okolja, in če bi usklajen pristop pri izvajanju te direktive zagotovil varstvo zdravja ljudi in okolja.
It is necessary to specify further the scope and content of the waste management planning obligation, and to integrate into the process of developing or revising waste management plans the need to take into account the environmental impacts of the generation and management of waste.
Določiti je treba tudi področje in vsebino obveznosti načrtovanja ravnanja z odpadki in v postopku oblikovanja ali revidiranja načrtov ravnanja z odpadki upoštevati okoljske vplive nastajanja odpadkov in ravnanja z njimi.
Account should also be taken, where appropriate, of the waste planning requirements laid down in Article 14 of Directive 94/62/EC and of the strategy for the reduction of biodegradable waste going to landfills, referred to in Article 5 of Directive 1999/31/EC.
Kadar je primerno, bi bilo treba upoštevati tudi zahteve za načrtovanje ravnanja z odpadki, določene v členu 14 Direktive 94/62/ES, in strategijo za zmanjšanje količine biološko razgradljivih odpadkov, ki se odlagajo na odlagališčih, iz člena 5 Direktive 1999/31/ES.
Member States may apply environmental authorisations or general environmental rules to certain waste producers without compromising the proper functioning of the internal market.
Države članice lahko za nekatere povzročitelje odpadkov uporabijo okoljska dovoljenja ali splošne okoljske predpise, ne da bi pri tem ogrozile pravilno delovanje notranjega trga.
According to Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006, Member States may take the measures necessary to prevent shipments of waste which are not in accordance with their waste management plans.
Države članice lahko skladno z Uredbo (ES) št. 1013/2006 sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za preprečevanje pošiljk odpadkov, ki niso v skladu z njihovimi načrti ravnanja z odpadki.
By way of derogation from that Regulation, Member States should be allowed to limit incoming shipments to incinerators classified as recovery, where it has been established that national waste would have to be disposed of or that waste would have to be treated in a way that is not consistent with their waste management plans.
Z odstopanjem od omenjene uredbe lahko države članice omejijo prihajajoče pošiljke odpadkov v sežigalnice, klasificirane kot predelava, če je bilo ugotovljeno, da bi bilo treba odstraniti v državi nastale odpadke ali da bi se odpadki obdelali na način, ki ni skladen z njihovimi načrti ravnanja z odpadki.
It is recognised that certain Member States may not be able to provide a network comprising the full range of final recovery facilities within their territory.
Dejstvo je, da nekatere države članice morda ne bodo mogle zagotoviti omrežja, ki bi vključevalo celoten sklop naprav za dokončno predelavo na njihovem ozemlju.
In order to improve the way in which waste prevention actions are taken forward in the Member States and to facilitate the circulation of best practice in this area, it is necessary to strengthen the provisions relating to waste prevention and to introduce a requirement for the Member States to develop waste prevention programmes concentrating on the key environmental impacts and taking into account the whole life-cycle of products and materials.
Za izboljšanje načina, na katerega se v državah članicah preprečuje nastajanje odpadkov, in za olajšanje izmenjave najboljše prakse na tem področju je treba poostriti določbe v zvezi s preprečevanjem nastajanja odpadkov in od držav članic zahtevati, naj oblikujejo programe preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov, ter se ob tem osredotočiti na ključne vplive na okolje in upoštevati celoten življenjski krog proizvodov in materialov.
Such measures should pursue the objective of breaking the link between economic growth and the environmental impacts associated with the generation of waste.
Namen takšnih ukrepov bi moral biti zasledovanje cilja prekinitve povezave med gospodarsko rastjo in vplivi na okolje zaradi nastajanja odpadkov.
Stakeholders, as well as the general public, should have the opportunity to participate in the drawing up of the programmes, and should have access to them once drawn up, in line with Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment [17].
Zainteresirane strani in širša javnost bi morale v skladu z Direktivo 2003/35/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. maja 2003 o sodelovanju javnosti pri sestavi nekaterih načrtov in programov v zvezi z okoljem [17] imeti možnost sodelovanja pri pripravi programov in dostop do njih po pripravi.
Waste prevention and decoupling objectives should be developed covering, as appropriate, the reduction of the adverse impacts of waste and of the amounts of waste generated.
Pri oblikovanju ciljev preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov in prekinitve njihove povezave z gospodarsko rastjo bi bilo treba ustrezno upoštevati zmanjšanje škodljivih vplivov ustvarjenih odpadkov in njihove količine.
In order to move towards a European recycling society with a high level of resource efficiency, targets for preparing for re-use and recycling of waste should be set.
Za uresničitev evropske družbe recikliranja z visoko stopnjo učinkovitosti virov bi bilo treba opredeliti cilje glede priprave za ponovno uporabo in recikliranje odpadkov.
Member States maintain different approaches to the collection of household wastes and wastes of a similar nature and composition.
Države članice imajo različne pristope glede zbiranja odpadkov iz gospodinjstev ter odpadkov podobne narave in sestave.
It is therefore appropriate that such targets take account of the different collection systems in different Member States.
Zato je primerno, da se pri teh ciljih upoštevajo različni sistemi zbiranja v različnih državah članicah.
Waste streams from other origins similar to household waste include waste referred to in entry 20 of the list established by Commission Decision 2000/532/EC.
Tokovi odpadkov drugačnega izvora, ki so podobni odpadkom iz gospodinjstev, zajemajo odpadke, navedene pod klasifikacijsko številko 20 v seznamu, oblikovanem z Odločbo Komisije 2000/532/ES.
Economic instruments can play a crucial role in the achievement of waste prevention and management objectives.
Ekonomski instrumenti lahko imajo ključno vlogo pri doseganju ciljev na področju preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov in ravnanja z njimi.
Waste often has value as a resource, and the further application of economic instruments may maximise environmental benefits.
Odpadki imajo pogosto vrednost kot vir, nadaljnja uporaba gospodarskih instrumentov pa lahko prinese optimalne koristi za okolje.
The use of such instruments at the appropriate level should therefore be encouraged while stressing that individual Member States can decide on their use.
Uporabo teh instrumentov bi zato bilo treba spodbujati na primerni ravni, ob tem pa poudariti, da se lahko posamezne države članice odločijo glede njihove uporabe.
Certain provisions on the handling of waste, laid down in Council Directive 91/689/EEC of 12 December 1991 on hazardous waste [18], should be amended in order to remove obsolete provisions and to improve the clarity of the text.
Nekatere določbe o ravnanju z odpadki iz Direktive Sveta 91/689/EGS z dne 12. decembra 1991 o nevarnih odpadkih [18] bi bilo treba spremeniti, da bi se tako črtale zastarele določbe in izboljšala jasnost besedila.
In the interests of simplifying Community legislation, they should be integrated into this Directive.
Zaradi poenostavitve zakonodaje Skupnosti bi jih bilo treba vključiti v to direktivo.
In order to clarify the operation of the mixing ban laid down in Directive 91/689/EEC, and to protect the environment and human health, the exemptions to the mixing ban should additionally comply with best available techniques as defined in Directive 96/61/EC.
Zaradi pojasnitve, kdaj velja prepoved mešanja iz Direktive 91/689/EGS, ter zaradi varstva okolja in zdravja ljudi bi morala odstopanja od prepovedi mešanja dodatno ustrezati najboljšim razpoložljivim tehnikam iz Direktive 96/61/ES.
Directive 91/689/EEC should therefore be repealed.
Direktivo 91/689/EGS bi bilo zato treba razveljaviti.
The management of waste oils should be conducted in accordance with the priority order of the waste hierarchy, and preference should be given to options that deliver the best overall environmental outcome.
Ravnanje z odpadnimi olji bi moralo biti v skladu s prednostnim vrstnim redom hierarhije ravnanja z odpadki, prednost pa bi bilo treba dati možnostim, ki skupaj zagotavljajo najboljši izid za okolje.
The separate collection of waste oils remains crucial to their proper management and the prevention of damage to the environment from their improper disposal.
Ločeno zbiranje odpadnih olj je še naprej bistveno za ustrezno ravnanje z njimi in preprečevanje škode za okolje zaradi neustreznega odstranjevanja olj.
Member States should provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties to be imposed on natural and legal persons responsible for waste management, such as waste producers, holders, brokers, dealers, transporters and collectors, establishments or undertakings which carry out waste treatment operations and waste management schemes, in cases where they infringe the provisions of this Directive.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne kazni, ki se v primeru kršitev določb te direktive naložijo fizičnim in pravnim osebam, odgovornim za ravnanje z odpadki, kot so povzročitelji in imetniki odpadkov, posredniki, trgovci, prevozniki in zbiralci, ustanove ali podjetja, ki izvajajo postopke obdelave odpadkov in sheme ravnanja z odpadki.
Member States may also take action to recover the costs of non-compliance and remedial measures, without prejudice to Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage [20].
Države članice lahko prav tako ukrepajo, da bi si povrnile stroške, ki so nastali zaradi neizpolnjevanja obveznosti in ukrepov za sanacijo, brez poseganja v Direktivo 2004/35/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o okoljski odgovornosti v zvezi s preprečevanjem in sanacijo okoljske škode [20].
The measures necessary for the implementation of this Directive should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission [21].
Ukrepe, potrebne za izvajanje te direktive, bi bilo treba sprejeti v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil [21].
In particular, the Commission should be empowered to establish criteria regarding a number of issues such as the conditions under which an object is to be considered a by-product, the end-of-waste status and the determination of waste which is considered as hazardous, as well as to establish detailed rules on the application and calculation methods for verifying compliance with the recycling targets set out in this Directive.
Zlasti bi bilo treba Komisiji podeliti pooblastila za oblikovanje meril za številna vprašanja, kot so denimo okoliščine, v katerih predmet velja za stranski proizvod, prenehanje statusa odpadka in določitev odpadkov, ki veljajo za nevarne, kakor tudi za določitev podrobnih pravil o uporabi in metodah izračuna za preverjanje skladnosti s cilji recikliranja iz te direktive.
Furthermore, the Commission should be empowered to adapt the annexes to technical and scientific progress and to specify the application of the formula for incineration facilities referred to in Annex II, R1.
Komisiji bi prav tako bilo treba podeliti pooblastila za prilagoditev prilog tehničnemu in znanstvenemu napredku in podrobno opredelitev uporabe enačbe za sežigalnice iz vnosa R1 v Prilogi II.
In accordance with paragraph 34 of the interinstitutional agreement on better law-making [22], Member States are encouraged to draw up, for themselves and in the interest of the Community, their own tables, illustrating, as far as possible, the correlation between this Directive and the transposition measures and to make them public.
V skladu z odstavkom 34 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje [22] se države članice spodbuja, da za lastne potrebe in v interesu Skupnosti izdelajo in objavijo lastne tabele, ki naj, kolikor je mogoče, prikažejo korelacijo med to direktivo in ukrepi za prenos v nacionalno pravo.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely the protection of the environment and human health, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reasons of the scale or effects of the Directive, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Ker cilja te direktive, in sicer varstva okolja in zdravja ljudi, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ga zaradi obsega ali učinkov direktive zato lažje doseže Skupnost, lahko Skupnost sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.