natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 49(3) of the Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [3] provides that basic acts may notably take the form of a decision pursuant to Article 18(5) of the Treaty.
Člen 49(3) Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [3], predvideva, da se temeljni akti lahko sprejemajo v obliki sklepov v skladu s členom 18(5) Pogodbe.
The EUSR will implement his mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could harm the Common Foreign and Security Policy objectives set out in Article 11 of the Treaty,
PPEU bo svoje naloge opravljal v razmerah, ki se lahko poslabšajo in bi lahko škodile ciljem skupne zunanje in varnostne politike iz člena 11 Pogodbe –
Mr Miroslav Lajčák is hereby appointed as European Union Special Representative (EUSR) in Bosnia and Herzegovina for the period from 1 July 2007 to 29 February 2008.
Miroslav Lajčák je imenovan za posebnega predstavnika EU (PPEU) v Bosni in Hercegovini za obdobje od 1. julija 2007 do 29. februarja 2008.
He shall exercise his functions in accordance with the mandate and the detailed arrangements set out in Joint Action 2007/87/CFSP.
Svoje naloge izvaja v skladu z mandatom in podrobnimi ureditvami iz Skupnega ukrepa 2007/87/SZVP.
The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mandate of the EUSR in the period from 1 July 2007 to 29 February 2008 shall be EUR 1530000.
Referenčni finančni znesek za kritje odhodkov, povezanih z nalogami PPEU, za obdobje od 1. julija 2007 do 29. februarja 2008 znaša 1530000 EUR.
The expenditure shall be eligible as from 1 July 2007.
Odhodki so upravičeni od 1. julija 2007.
The EUSR shall present the Secretary General/High Representative, the Council and the Commission with a comprehensive report on the implementation of his mandate by mid-November 2007.
PPEU do sredine novembra 2007 predloži generalnemu sekretarju/visokemu predstavniku, Svetu in Komisiji izčrpno poročilo o izvajanju svojega mandata.
Joint Action as amended by Joint Action 2006/523/CFSP (OJ L 207, 27.7.2006, p. 30).
Skupni ukrep, kakor je bil spremenjen s Skupnim ukrepom 2006/523/SZVP (UL L 207, 27.7.2006, str. 30).
OJ L 35, 8.2.2007, p. 35.
UL L 35, 8.2.2007, str. 35.
concerning the non-inclusion of cadusafos in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance
o nevključitvi kadusafosa v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o preklicu registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo navedeno snov
(notified under document number C(2007) 2511)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 2511)
That list includes cadusafos.
Navedeni seznam vključuje kadusafos.
For cadusafos the effects on human health and the environment have been assessed in accordance with the provisions laid down in Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 and (EC) No 703/2001 for a range of uses proposed by the notifier.
Vplivi kadusafosa na zdravje ljudi in okolje so bili ocenjeni v skladu z določbami uredb (ES) št. 451/2000 in (ES) št. 703/2001 za vrste uporab, ki jih je predlagal prijavitelj.
For cadusafos the rapporteur Member State was Greece and all relevant information was submitted on 1 June 2004.
Država članica poročevalka za kadusafos je bila Grčija, vse ustrezne informacije pa so bile predložene 1. junija 2004.
The assessment report was peer reviewed by the Member States and the EFSA and presented to the Commission on 24 April 2006 in the format of the EFSA conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance cadusafos [4].
Poročilo o oceni so v okviru delovne skupine za ovrednotenje pregledali strokovnjaki držav članic in EFSA ter ga 24. aprila 2006 predložili Komisiji v obliki sklepa EFSA o strokovnem pregledu ocene tveganja pesticidov z aktivno snovjo kadusafos [4].
This report was reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 24 November 2006 in the format of the Commission review report for cadusafos.
To poročilo so države članice in Komisija pregledale v okviru Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter končno različico pripravile 24. novembra 2006 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu glede kadusafosa.
Based on the available information, it has not been demonstrated that the estimated exposure of consumers resulting from the acute and chronic intake assessment is acceptable, due to insufficient information on the residue level.
Na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij ni bilo dokazano, da je predvidena izpostavljenost potrošnika, ki sledi iz akutne in kronične ocene vnosa, sprejemljiva, ker ni dovolj informacij o mejni vrednosti ostankov.
Moreover the risk to groundwater could not be assessed, due to a lack of data.
Poleg tega zaradi premalo podatkov ni bilo mogoče oceniti tveganja za podzemne vode.
Therefore it was not possible to conclude, on the basis of the information available, that cadusafos met the criteria for inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Zato kadusafos na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij ni izpolnil pogojev za vključitev v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
However, despite the arguments advanced, the above concerns remained unsolved, and assessments made on the basis of the information submitted and evaluated during the EFSA expert meetings have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing cadusafos satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Toda kljub predloženim argumentom se navedenih pomislekov ni dalo odpraviti, po ocenah na podlagi predloženih informacij, preučenih na srečanjih strokovnjakov EFSA, pa ne kaže pričakovati, da bi lahko fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo kadusafos, pod predvidenimi pogoji uporabe na splošno izpolnjevala zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
Cadusafos should therefore not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Kadusafos se zato ne sme vključiti v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Measures should be taken to ensure that authorisations granted for plant protection products containing cadusafos are withdrawn within a fixed period of time and are not renewed and that no new authorisations for such products are granted.
Sprejeti je treba ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo kadusafos, prekličejo v predpisanem roku in se ne podaljšajo ali izdajo nove registracije za taka sredstva.
Any period of grace granted by Member States for the disposal, storage, placing on the market and use of existing stocks of plant protection products containing cadusafos, should be limited to 12 months in order to allow existing stocks to be used in one further growing season.
Če države članice odobrijo podaljšanje roka za odstranjevanje, skladiščenje, dajanje v promet in uporabo obstoječih zalog fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo kadusafos, ga je treba omejiti na obdobje največ dvanajstih mesecev, da se omogoči uporaba obstoječih zalog v naslednji rastni sezoni.
This Decision does not prejudice the submission of an application for cadusafos according to the provisions of Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC in view of a possible inclusion in its Annex I.
Ta odločba ne vpliva na predložitev zahtevka za kadusafos v skladu z določbami člena 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS zaradi morebitne vključitve v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi.
Cadusafos shall not be included as active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Kadusafos se ne vključi kot aktivna snov v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Authorisations for plant protection products containing cadusafos are withdrawn by 18 December 2007;
se registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo kadusafos, prekličejo do 18. decembra 2007;
no authorisations for plant protection products containing cadusafos are granted or renewed under the derogation provided for in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
se za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo kadusafos, ne odobrijo ali podaljšajo nobene registracije na podlagi odstopanja iz člena 8(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
Any period of grace granted by Member States in accordance with the provisions of Article 4(6) of Directive 91/414/EEC, shall be as short as possible and shall expire not later than 18 December 2008 at the latest.
Morebitno podaljšanje roka, ki ga odobrijo države članice v skladu z določbami člena 4(6) Direktive 91/414/EGS, je čim krajše in traja največ do 18. decembra 2008.
amending Decision 2005/429/EC establishing a specific monitoring programme related to the recovery of cod stocks
o spremembi Odločbe 2005/429/ES o uvedbi posebnega programa nadzora obnovitve staležev trsk
(notified under document number C(2007) 2550)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 2550)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy [1], and in particular Article 34c(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2847/93 z dne 12. oktobra 1993 o oblikovanju nadzornega sistema na področju skupne ribiške politike [1] in zlasti člena 34c(1) Uredbe,
Council Regulation (EC) No 423/2004 [2], lays down measures for the recovery of cod stocks in the Kattegat, the North Sea, the Skagerrak and the Eastern Channel, the West of Scotland and the Irish Sea.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 423/2004 [2] določa ukrepe za obnovitev staležev trsk v Kattegatu, Severnem morju, Skagerraku in vzhodnem Rokavskem prelivu, zahodno od Škotske in v Irskem morju.
Council Regulations (EC) No 27/2005 [3], (EC) No 51/2006 [4] and (EC) No 41/2007 [5], provide for interim fishing effort limitations and additional conditions for monitoring, inspection and surveillance in the context of certain stocks recovery measures applicable to all fisheries likely to catch cod in those waters.
Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 27/2005 [3], (ES) št. 51/2006 [4] in (ES) št. 41/2007 [5] določajo začasne omejitve ribolovnega napora in dodatne pogoje za spremljanje, inšpekcijo in nadzorovanje v okviru nekaterih ukrepov obnovitve staležev, ki se uporabljajo za vsa ribištva, ki bodo verjetno lovila trsko v navedenih vodah.
Commission Decision 2005/429/EC [6] establishes a specific monitoring programme applicable for a period of two years with the objective of guaranteeing an appropriate level of implementation of the conservation and control measures applicable to fishing activities in relation to the recovery of cod stocks.
Odločba Komisije 2005/429/ES [6] je uvedla poseben program nadzora, ki se uporablja za obdobje dveh let, zato da se zagotovi ustrezna raven izvajanja ukrepov ohranjevanja in nadzora ribolovnih dejavnosti glede obnovitve staležev trsk.
The specific monitoring programme is necessary for the organisation of operational cooperation between Member States concerned and to allow the Community Fisheries Control Agency to organise joint deployment plans in accordance with Article 9 of Council Regulation (EC) No 768/2005 [7].
Posebni program nadzora je potreben, da se organizira operativno sodelovanje med zadevnimi državami članicami in da Agencija Skupnosti za nadzor ribištva lahko sestavi načrte skupne uporabe v skladu s členom 9 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 768/2005 [7].
In order to ensure the continued implementation of conservation and control measures, the specific monitoring programme should be extended for a period of one year.
Za zagotovitev nepretrganega izvajanja ukrepov ohranjevanja in nadzora je treba posebni program nadzora podaljšati za obdobje enega leta.
Decision 2005/429/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 2005/429/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
In Article 1 of Decision 2005/429/EC, the words ‘for a period of two years’ are replaced by the words ‘for a period of three years’.
V členu 1 Odločbe 2005/429/ES se besedilo „za obdobje dveh let“ nadomesti z besedilom „za obdobje treh let“.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic, Ireland, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Kingdom of Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Kraljevino Belgijo, Kraljevino Dansko, Zvezno republiko Nemčijo, Francosko republiko, Irsko, Kraljevino Nizozemsko, Kraljevino Švedsko in Združeno kraljestvo Velika Britanija in Severna Irska.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 (OJ L 409, 30.12.2006, p. 11).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1967/2006 (UL L 409, 30.12.2006, str. 11).
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 441/2007 (OJ L 104, 21.4.2007, p. 28).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 441/2007 (UL L 104, 21.4.2007, str. 28).
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) 1936/2005 (OJ L 311, 26.11.2005, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1936/2005 (UL L 311, 26.11.2005, str. 1).
Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 609/2007 (OJ L 141, 2.6.2007, p. 33).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 609/2007 (UL L 141, 2.6.2007, str. 33).
OJ L 148, 11.6.2005, p. 36.
UL L 148, 11.6.2005, str. 36.
OJ L 128, 21.5.2005, p. 1.
UL L 128, 21.5.2005, str. 1.
of 19 June 2007
z dne 19. junija 2007
terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of synthetic staple fibres of polyesters (PSF) originating in Malaysia and Taiwan and releasing the amounts secured by way of the provisional duties imposed
o zaključku protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom sintetičnih rezanih vlaken iz poliestra (RVP) s poreklom iz Malezije in Tajvana in o sprostitvi zneskov, zavarovanih z začasnimi dajatvami
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“) in zlasti člena 9(3) Uredbe,
On 3 March 2006, the Commission received a complaint pursuant to Article 5 of the basic regulation concerning injurious dumping of imports of synthetic staple fibres of polyesters (PSF) originating in Malaysia and Taiwan.
Komisija je 3. marca 2006 prejela pritožbo v skladu s členom 5 osnovne uredbe v zvezi s škodljivim dampingom uvoza sintetičnih rezanih vlaken iz poliestra (RVP) s poreklom iz Malezije in Tajvana.
The complaint was lodged by CIRFS (Comité International de la Rayonne et des Fibres Synthétiques) representing more than 50 % of the total Community production of PSF.
Pritožbo je vložil CIRFS (Comité International de la Rayonne et des Fibres Synthétiques), ki predstavlja več kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje RVP Skupnosti.
Following the initiation of an anti-dumping investigation on 12 April 2006, the Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 2005/2006 [2], imposed provisional anti-dumping duties on imports into the Community of synthetic staple fibres of polyesters (‘PSF’) originating in Malaysia and Taiwan (‘provisional Regulation’).
Po začetku protidampinške preiskave z dne 12. aprila 2006 je Komisija z Uredbo (ES) št. 2005/2006 [2] uvedla začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz sintetičnih rezanih vlaken iz poliestra (RVP) s poreklom iz Malezije in Tajvana („začasna uredba“).
The provisional anti-dumping duties which took the form of ad valorem duties ranging between 12,4 % and 23 % for Malaysia and 14,7 % and 29,5 % for Taiwan applied as of 29 December 2006.
Začasne protidampinške dajatve, ki so bile določene v obliki ad valorem, znašajo med 12,4 % in 23 % za Malezijo ter 14,7 % in 29,5 % za Tajvan in se uporabljajo od 29. decembra 2006.
Following the publication of the provisional Regulation, parties received disclosure of the facts and considerations on which the provisional Regulation was based.
Po objavi začasne uredbe so bili strankam posredovani premisleki in dejstva, na katerih je temeljila začasna uredba.
All parties were granted a period within which to make presentations subsequent to the disclosures.
Vsem strankam je bilo odobreno obdobje, v katerem so lahko izrazile stališča glede razkritij.
Those parties who so requested were also granted an opportunity to be heard orally.
Strankam je bila na zahtevo dana tudi možnost ustnega zaslišanja.
Based on these findings it arrived at the conclusion that compelling reasons existed on Community interest not to impose anti-dumping measures on imports of PSF from the countries concerned.
Glede na te ugotovitve je Komisija sklenila, da obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi, da uvedba protidampinških ukrepov za uvoz RVP s poreklom iz zadevnih držav ni v interesu Skupnosti.
The Commission disclosed all the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to terminate the proceeding.
Komisija je razkrila vsa bistvena dejstva in premisleke, na podlagi katerih namerava zaključiti ta postopek.
The interested parties were also granted a period within which to make presentations subsequent to this disclosure and were granted an opportunity to be heard orally.
Zainteresiranim strankam je bil odobren rok, v katerem so lahko izrazile svoja stališča, dana pa jim je bila tudi možnost za zaslišanje.
The written and oral comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and, where appropriate, taken into account for the definitive findings.
Ustne in pisne pripombe, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane stranke, so bile proučene in po potrebi upoštevane v dokončnih ugotovitvah.
Originally, after consultation of the advisory Committee, the Commission submitted to the Council a report on the results of the consultation, together with a proposal that the proceeding be terminated on grounds of Community interest.
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom je Komisija prvotno Svetu predložila poročilo o rezultatih posvetovanja ter predlog, da se postopek zaključi, saj je to v interesu Skupnosti.
In the meantime, by letter dated 23 May 2007 and addressed to the Commission, the complainant formally withdrew its complaint concerning the imports of synthetic staple fibres of polyesters (PSF) originating in Malaysia and Taiwan.
Medtem je pritožnik s pismom Komisiji z dne 23. maja 2007 uradno umaknil svojo pritožbo v zvezi z uvozom sintetičnih rezanih vlaken iz poliestra (RVP) s poreklom iz Malezije in Tajvana.
In accordance with Article 9(1) of the basic Regulation, the proceeding may be terminated where the complaint is withdrawn unless such termination would not be in the Community interest.
V skladu s členom 9(1) osnovne uredbe se lahko postopek zaključi, če je pritožba umaknjena, razen če to ne bi bilo v interesu Skupnosti.
The Commission considered that the present proceeding should be terminated since the investigation had not brought to light any considerations showing that such termination would not be in the Community interest.
Komisija je menila, da je treba sedanji postopek zaključiti, saj v preiskavi ni bilo ugotovljeno, da to ne bi bilo v interesu Skupnosti.
Indeed, during the investigation the Commission contacted all parties known to be concerned to obtain their views.
Komisija je za pridobitev stališč med preiskavo dejansko vzpostavila stik z vsemi strankami, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva.
In addition to the Community industry, users and users associations made submissions and/or have been heard concerning the possible impact of the imposition of definitive measures.
Poleg industrije Skupnosti so svoja stališča predložili tudi uporabniki in združenja uporabnikov ali pa so bili zaslišani v zvezi z možnim učinkom uvedbe dokončnih ukrepov.
Based on these new findings, the Commission arrived at the conclusion that compelling reasons exist on grounds of Community interest not to impose anti-dumping measures on imports of PSF from the countries concerned.
Glede na te nove ugotovitve je Komisija sklenila, da obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi, da uvedba protidampinških ukrepov za uvoz RVP s poreklom iz zadevnih držav ni v interesu Skupnosti.
An appreciation of the various interests taken as a whole was made on the basis of the arguments explained below.
Presoja različnih interesov je bila izvedena na podlagi spodaj navedenih utemeljitev.
Indeed, following the imposition of provisional measures, one importer, a large number of users and users associations came forward and claimed that the level of the measures was particularly high and that they were, as a consequence, prevented from importing from their largest sources of supply in Asia.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov so se javili en uvoznik, številni uporabniki ter združenja uporabnikov in trdili, da je bila raven ukrepov še posebno visoka in da jim je to preprečilo, da bi uvažali od svojih največjih virov dobave v Aziji.
They confirmed the arguments already put forward by other users before the imposition of provisional measures, described in recitals 156 to 158 of the provisional Regulation, and made new claims.
Potrdili so trditve, ki so jih že predložili drugi uporabniki pred uvedbo začasnih ukrepov, navedene v uvodnih izjavah (156) do (158) začasne uredbe, in navedli nove.
In order to examine in detail the relevance of the new issues raised by users' industries, the Commission requested the parties to provide data and supporting evidence encouraging all users and their associations to further cooperate in the investigation.
Da bi lahko Komisija podrobno proučila pomen novih vprašanj, ki jih je izpostavila industrija uporabnikov, je stranke zaprosila, da predložijo podatke in dokaze, in tako vse uporabnike in njihova združenja spodbudila k nadaljnjem sodelovanju pri preiskavi.
Cooperation increased compared to the situation before the imposition of provisional measures, as users representing over 10 % of total Community consumption of PSF and about 15 % of total imports from the countries concerned cooperated in the investigation.
Sodelovanje se je v primerjavi s sodelovanjem pred uvedbo začasnih ukrepov izboljšalo, saj so pri preiskavi sodelovali uporabniki, ki predstavljajo 10 % celotne potrošnje RVP Skupnosti in približno 15 % celotnega uvoza iz zadevnih držav.
The participation of major users associations in the investigation (representing companies that account for more than 50 % of total consumption of PSF in the Community) was also taken into consideration, thereby confirming that the findings and conclusions reached on the need to terminate the investigation on grounds of Community interest were sufficiently substantiated.
Upoštevalo se je tudi sodelovanje glavnih združenj uporabnikov pri preiskavi (zastopnikov družb, ki predstavljajo več kot 50 % celotne potrošnje RVP v Skupnosti), s čimer se potrdi, da so ugotovitev in sklepi o potrebi po zaključku preiskave na podlagi interesa Skupnosti zadostno utemeljeni.
According to users, the imposition of measures will aggravate the shortages of PSF supply because the Community industry is not able to satisfy EU demand.
Po mnenju uporabnikov bo uvedba ukrepov še poslabšala stanje glede pomanjkanja dobave RVP, ker industrija Skupnosti ne more zadovoljiti povpraševanja EU.
This situation will also play a role in increasing the price of PSF and thus prices of products in the downstream industries, threatening their competitiveness in a market where low-priced imports of finished products play an important role.
To stanje bo vplivalo na povišanje cene RVP in torej cen izdelkov v industriji na koncu proizvodne verige, ter ogrozilo njihovo konkurenčnost na trgu, kjer je poceni uvoz končnih izdelkov zelo pomemben.
Under these circumstances, losses in employment in the Community industries using PSF are to be expected in the short term.
V teh okoliščinah se kratkoročno pričakuje zmanjšanje zaposlenosti v industriji Skupnosti, ki uporablja RVP.
Shortages of supply
Pomanjkanje ponudbe