natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to the Belgian authorities, Techspace Aero’s R & D expenditure increased from […] per annum prior to the launch of the programme to […] per annum in 2005.
Po mnenju belgijskih organov so se stroški družbe Techspace Aero za R & R povečali od […] letno pred začetkom izvajanja programa na […] letno v letu 2005.
Similarly, the ratio of R & D expenditure to turnover rose from […] to […].
Enako se je razmerje med stroški za R & R in prometom družbe povečalo z […] na […].
Grounds for initiating the procedure
Razlogi, ki so privedli do pričetka postopka
In its decision of 22 June 2006 the Commission examined the aid in the light of the R & D framework and raised doubts regarding its compatibility with this framework.
V odločbi z dne 22. junija 2006 je Komisija analizirala ukrep glede na okvir R & R in izrazila dvome o združljivosti pomoči s tem okvirom.
The Commission noted that the aid was granted in the form of an advance repayable on the basis of sales of the product resulting from the research activity.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je bila pomoč odobrena v obliki predplačila, ki se odplačuje glede na prodajo izdelka, ki je rezultat raziskovalne dejavnosti.
Advances of this kind, repayable in the event of a successful outcome of research activities, are very common in the aircraft industry.
Ta oblika predplačila, vračljivega v primeru uspešne raziskovalne dejavnosti, je na področju aeronavtike zelo običajna.
Point 5.6 of the R & D framework makes specific provision for this type of advance.
Točka 5.6 okvira R & R natančno opredeljuje možnost tovrstnega predplačila.
It indicates that the allowable level of aid intensity for such aid instruments (25 % for PCD and 50 % for IR) may be increased based on a case-by-case assessment of the repayment conditions.
Navaja, da je za tovrstna orodja možno povečati sprejemljiv obseg pomoči (25 % za DPC in 50 % za IR) na podlagi ocene posameznih pogojev odplačevanja.
Since the entry into force of the R & D framework, the Commission has received notification of numerous cases of aid in the form of advances repayable in the event of a successful outcome.
Odkar je začel veljati okvir R & R, je Komisija prejela obvestila o številnih primerih pomoči v obliki vračljivega predplačila v primeru uspešnega izida.
It has developed a body of practice for interpretating point 5.6 of the framework [6].
Ob tej priložnosti je Komisija uvedla prakso razlage točke 5.6 tega okvira [6].
In the cases analysed by the Commission to date, the beneficiary has, in the event of the success of a programme, been required to repay, in addition to the advance principal, interest based on the reference and discount rate set by the Commission for the Member State concerned at the time the aid was granted.
V primerih, ki jih je Komisija doslej analizirala, mora upravičenec, če gre za uspešen program, poleg predplačila glavnice povrniti tudi obresti, izračunane na podlagi referenčnih in diskontnih stopenj, ki jih je Komisija ob odobritvi pomoči določila za zadevno državo članico.
For particularly successful programmes, the repayment rates have been even higher.
V primerih posebno uspešnih programov je bilo vračilo celo še višje.
Under the circumstances, the Commission’s practice has been to limit the advance to a maximum of 40 % of eligible costs for PCD activities and 60 % for IR activities. These basic rates may be exceeded by the extra percentage points (bonuses) provided for in point 5.10 of the R & D framework.
V teh okoliščinah je Komisija običajno omejila razmerje „predplačila upravičenih stroškov“ na največ 40 % za dejavnosti DPC in na 60 % za dejavnosti IR; te osnovne stopnje se lahko po možnosti povečajo z dodatnimi odstotnimi točkami (bonusi), določenimi v točki 5.10 okvira R & R.
In the aid scheme in question, however, the Commission notes that the Belgian authorities have applied these maximum levels of 40 % and 60 % (plus a bonus of 5 % in accordance with point 5.10.2 of the R & D framework), whereas the arrangements for repayment of the advance do not envisage payment of any interest, even in the event of the success of the programme.
V obravnavanem primeru pa je Komisija ugotovila, da so belgijski organi uporabili prag 40 % in 60 % (plus bonus 5 % v skladu z drugim pododstavkom točke 5.10.2 okvira R & R), četudi v dogovoru za vračilo predplačila ni bilo predvideno plačilo nikakršnih obresti, niti v primeru uspešnega programa.
As indicated in the Commission decision of 22 June 2006, the arrangements for repaying of the aid are considerably more favourable for Techspace Aero than the traditional arrangements for aid beneficiaries in the cases hitherto examined by the Commission.
Kakor je navedeno v Odločbi Komisije z dne 22. junija 2006, je bil dogovor za vračilo pomoči za Techspace Aero bistveno ugodnejši od običajnih dogovorov za upravičence do pomoči, ki jih je doslej pregledovala Komisija.
Since they do not have to pay any interest, the beneficiary companies are guaranteed to benefit from the aid whatever the outcome of the project, whereas under traditional repayment arrangements the aid may not be granted at all in the event of a successful outcome (and may even be negative in cases of highly successful projects where the enterprise may enable the government to earn money, including in real terms).
Ker jim ni treba plačati obresti, so podjetja, upravičena do pomoči, prepričana, da bodo imela nekakšno korist ne glede na uspešnost programa, medtem ko se pri običajnih dogovorih pomoč sploh ne dodeli v primeru uspešnega programa (ali pa je razmerje celo negativno v primeru zelo uspešnega programa, ko podjetje vladi vrne več, kot je prejelo, tudi v realnem smislu).
The Belgian authorities have modified the arrangements for granting aid to Techspace Aero by means of an amendment to the contract signed by the parties and sent to the Commission on 24 November 2006.
Belgijski organi so spremenili način dodelitve pomoči za Techspace Aero v obliki dopolnila k pogodbi, ki so ga pogodbenice podpisale in Komisiji predložile 24. novembra 2006.
This amendment provides for recovery of part of the aid granted in order to reduce its intensity level to that stipulated by the R & D framework (50 % maximum for IR activities and 25 % maximum for PCD activities, increased by 5 % if the project is carried out in one of the regions covered by Article 87(3)(c)).
V njem je predvideno vračilo dela dodeljene pomoči, da se njen obseg zniža na raven, ki je predpisana za subvencije v okviru R & R (največ 50 % za dejavnosti IR in 25 % za dejavnosti DPC, povečano za 5 %, če se projekt izvaja v eni od regij, ki jih ureja člen 87(3)(c)).
The Belgian authorities will recover the surplus amount of the aid by 31 March 2007 and will charge interest on this amount at the Commission’s reference and discount rate in force at the time the aid was granted.
Belgijski organi bodo izterjali presežni znesek pomoči najpozneje do 31. marca 2007 in na ta znesek zaračunali obresti po referenčni in diskontni stopnji Komisije, ki je veljala ob dodelitvi pomoči.
As provided for in the grant agreement, in the event of the success of the project the Belgian authorities will, in addition to this initial recovery, require repayment, free of interest, of the part of the aid kept by the enterprise.
Kot je določeno v pogodbi o dodelitvi pomoči, bodo belgijski organi v primeru uspešnega projekta poleg te prvotne izterjave zahtevali tudi brezobrestno vračilo dela pomoči, ki ga je podjetje obdržalo.
Advance reduced to aid intensity level
Predplačilo, znižano na raven, ki je predpisana za subvencije
Eligible costs (EUR ‘000)
Upravičeni stroški
Final intensity
(v tisočih EUR)
Advance paid
Končni obseg
(EUR ‘000)
(v tisočih EUR)
Recovery with interest
(v tisočih EUR) Vračilo z obrestmi
The advance finally granted to Techspace Aero amounts to EUR 31978850, corresponding to an intensity level of […], which is the weighted average of the intensities applicable to the relative costs of IR and PCD activities.
Predplačilo, ki je končno dodeljeno družbi Techspace Aero, znaša 31978850 EUR oziroma […], kar je ponderirano povprečje intenzivnosti, ki se uporablja za stroške dejavnosti IR in DPC.
The advance was granted by the Belgian Federal Government to a single company.
Predplačilo je izplačano iz sredstev belgijske zvezne vlade. Dodeljeno je eni sami družbi.
It is repaid only in the event of the success of the product being researched.
Sredstva se vračajo samo v primeru komercialnega uspeha izdelka, ki je predmet raziskave.
This makes the advance more advantageous than a loan at market rates.
To je prednost v primerjavi s posojili po tržnih pogojih.
Lastly, Techspace Aero is engaged in an area in which there is significant trade between Member States.
Poleg tega je družba Techspace Aero dejavna na področju, na katerem je veliko trgovanja med državami članicami.
It therefore meets the cumulative criteria for determining the existence of State aid as defined in Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Ukrep torej izpolnjuje kumulativna merila za opredelitev državne pomoči v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
Unlawfulness of State aid
Nezakonitost državne pomoči
The aid was granted on 1 October 2003, even before it was notified to the Commission and therefore necessarily before it had been approved by the Commission.
Pomoč je bila dodeljena 1. oktobra 2003, še preden je bila priglašena Komisiji, torej preden jo je ta sploh odobrila.
There is no suspension clause whereby payment of the advance is subject to analysis of the scheme by the Commission in accordance with Community State aid rules.
Ne obstaja klavzula, po kateri bi Komisija odložila izplačilo predplačila za analizo v skladu s pravili Skupnosti o državni pomoči.
Since the scheme has already been implemented, it must be considered to be unlawful within the meaning of Article 1(b) and (f) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999.
Ker se je ukrep že izvajal, ga je treba šteti kot nezakonitega v smislu člena 1(b) in (f) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999.
Compatibility of State aid
Združljivost državne pomoči
Modification of the aid scheme as described in paragraphs 26 and 27 takes away the advantage initially conferred on the beneficiary by reducing the aid intensity to the level stipulated in the R & D framework (50 % for IR activities and 25 % for PCD activities, increased by 5 % if the project is carried out in one of the regions covered by Article 87(3)(c)).
Sprememba načina dodelitve pomoči, kot je opisana v odstavkih 26 in 27, je izničila prednost, prvotno dodeljeno upravičencu, tako da je njen obseg znižala na raven, predpisano za subvencije v okviru R & R (največ 50 % za dejavnosti IR in 25 % za dejavnosti DPC, povečano za 5 %, če se projekt izvaja v eni od regij, ki jih ureja člen 87(3)(c)).
The Belgian authorities undertake to take away the additional advantage temporarily granted to Techspace Aero relative to the beneficiaries of aid in the form of repayable advances in the cases hitherto examined by the Commission.
Belgijski organi se obvezujejo, da bodo ukinili dodatno prednost, začasno dodeljeno družbi Techspace Aero glede na upravičence do pomoči v obliki vračljivega predplačila, ki jih je Komisija doslej preiskovala.
The Commission notes that Belgium has unlawfully implemented the R & D aid for Techspace Aero in breach of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je Belgija nezakonito izvajala pomoč na področju raziskav in razvoja za družbo Techspace Aero, kar je kršitev člena 88(3) Pogodbe ES.
However, Belgium has adapted State aid granted so as to bring it into line with the Community framework on State aid for research and development,
Vendar je Belgija državno pomoč prilagodila tako, da je združljiva s smernicami Skupnosti o državni pomoči za raziskave in razvoj –
The aid for research and development implemented by Belgium for Techspace Aero for an initial amount of EUR 41274000 and modified as described in paragraphs 26 and 27 is compatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč Belgije družbi Techspace Aero za raziskave in razvoj v začetnem znesku 41274000 EUR in spremenjena na način, opisan v točkah 26 in 27, je združljiva s skupnim trgom.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006 (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1791/2006 (UL L 363, 20.12.2006, str. 1).
OJ C 196, 19.8.2006, p. 16.
UL C 196, 19.8.2006, str. 16.
See the cases cited in footnote 4 of the Commission Decision of 22 June 2006 (OJ C 196, 19.8.2006, p. 16).
Glej citirane primere v sprotni opombi 4 na strani 18 Odločbe Komisije z dne 22. junija 2006 (UL C 196, 19.8.2006, str. 16).
In addition to recovery, with interest, of the surplus aid, repayment of the remaining aid goes beyond the requirements of the R & D framework. The aid thus modified is therefore compatible with that framework.
Poleg izterjave presežnega zneska pomoči z obrestmi vred, vračilo preostale pomoči presega zahteve okvira R & R. Tako prilagojena pomoč je torej združljiva s tem okvirom.
amending Decision 2002/757/EC on provisional emergency phytosanitary measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Community of Phytophthora ramorum Werres, De Cock & Man in ‘t Veld sp.nov.
o spremembi Odločbe 2002/757/ES o začasnih izrednih fitosanitarnih ukrepih za preprečevanje vnosa škodljivega organizma Phytophthora ramorum Werres, De Cock & Man in 't Veld sp. nov. v Skupnost in njegovega širjenja v Skupnosti
(notified under document number C(2007) 1292)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 1292)
On the basis of recent scientific information on the possible damage caused by the harmful organism, it appears that the list of plants, wood and bark susceptible for the harmful organism should be extended and updated.
Na osnovi najnovejših znanstvenih informacij o možni škodi, ki jo povzroča škodljivi organizem, je treba razširiti ter posodobiti seznam rastlin, lesa in lubja, občutljivih na škodljive organizme.
In order to avoid misinterpretation, it should be laid down clearly that plant passports are necessary for each movement of specific species of susceptible plants within the Community.
Za preprečitev napačne razlage je treba jasno določiti obvezno uporabo rastlinskih potnih listov za vsako premeščanje nekaterih vrst občutljivih rastlin v Skupnosti.
As a result of the official surveys carried out under Decision 2002/757/EC, it appears that at least two official inspections of specific species of susceptible plants in places of production are needed annually during the growing period to confirm the absence of the harmful organism.
Uradne raziskave, opravljene v skladu z Odločbo 2002/757/ES, so pokazale, da sta za potrditev odsotnosti škodljivega organizma letno v obdobju rasti potrebna vsaj dva uradna pregleda nekaterih vrst občutljivih rastlin na mestih pridelave.
In order to allow sufficient time to adjust to this requirement, it should apply as of 1 May 2007.
Da se omogoči dovolj časa za prilagoditev tej zahtevi, ta začne veljati 1. maja 2007.
From follow-up experience with the implementation of eradication measures on outbreak sites, it appears that measures should cover not only plants, but also associated growing media and plant debris.
Nadaljnje izkušnje z izvajanjem ukrepov izkoreninjenja na krajih izbruha so pokazale, da se morajo ukrepi poleg rastlin uporabljati tudi za povezani rastni substrat in rastlinske odpadke.
Those measures should also include phytosanitary measures on the growing surface around such sites.
Navedeni ukrepi morajo vključevati tudi fitosanitarne ukrepe na pridelovalni površini okoli takih krajev.
It further appears necessary to continue the surveys carried out by the Member States as regards evidence of infestation by the harmful organism and to notify the results thereof on an annual basis.
Poleg tega se zdi, da je treba nadaljevati raziskave, ki jih države članice izvajajo v zvezi z dokazi napada škodljivega organizma, in rezultate teh raziskav sporočati vsako leto.
It is appropriate that the results of such measures be reviewed after the next growing season, and possible subsequent measures be considered in the light of the results of that review.
Po naslednjem obdobju rasti je primerno ponovno pregledati rezultate takih ukrepov in z vidika rezultatov tega pregleda proučiti možne naknadne ukrepe.
The subsequent measures should also take into account the information to be provided and the scientific opinions to be delivered by the Member States.
Naknadni ukrepi morajo upoštevati tudi informacije in znanstvena mnenja, ki jih morajo zagotoviti države članice.
Decision 2002/757/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 2002/757/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Decision 2002/757/EC is amended as follows:
Odločba 2002/757/ES se spremeni:
In Article 1, paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 are replaced by the following:
V členu 1 se odstavki 2, 3 in 4 nadomestijo z naslednjim besedilom:
“susceptible plants’” means plants, other than fruit and seeds, of Acer macrophyllum Pursh, Acer pseudoplatanus L., Adiantum aleuticum (Rupr.)
‚občutljive rastline‘ so rastline, razen plodov in semen, Acer macrophyllum Pursh, Acer pseudoplatanus L., Adiantum aleuticum (Rupr.)
L., other than Rhododendron simsii Planch., Rosa gymnocarpa Nutt., Salix caprea L., Sequoia sempervirens (Lamb. ex D. Don) Endl., Syringa vulgaris L., Taxus spp.
L., razen Rhododendron simsii Planch., Rosa gymnocarpa Nutt., Salix caprea L., Sequoia sempervirens (Lamb. ex D. Don) Endl., Syringa vulgaris L., Taxus spp.
Nutt., Vaccinium ovatum Pursh and Viburnum spp.
Nutt., Vaccinium ovatum Pursh in Viburnum spp.
“susceptible wood” means wood of Acer macrophyllum Pursh, Aesculus californica (Spach) Nutt., Lithocarpus densiflorus (Hook.
‚občutljiv les‘ je les Acer macrophyllum Pursh, Aesculus californica (Spach) Nutt., Lithocarpus densiflorus (Hook.
and Taxus brevifolia Nutt.
in Taxus brevifolia Nutt.
“susceptible bark” means isolated bark of Acer macrophyllum Pursh, Aesculus californica (Spach) Nutt., Lithocarpus densiflorus (Hook.
‚občutljivo lubje‘ je izolirano lubje Acer macrophyllum Pursh, Aesculus californica (Spach) Nutt., Lithocarpus densiflorus (Hook.
and Taxus brevifolia Nutt.’
in Taxus brevifolia Nutt.“
In Article 5, ‘from their place of production’ is replaced by ‘within the Community’.
V členu 5 se „z mesta pridelave“ nadomesti z „v Skupnosti“.
In Article 6, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:
V členu 6 se odstavek 2 nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 16(1) of Directive 2000/29/EC, the results of these surveys provided for in the first paragraph shall be notified to the Commission and to the other Member States annually by 1 December.’
Brez poseganja v določbe člena 16(1) Direktive 2000/29/ES se o izsledkih teh sistematičnih raziskav iz prvega odstavka obvesti Komisijo in druge države članice vsako leto do 1. decembra.“
In Article 8, ‘31 December 2004’ is replaced by ‘31 January 2008’.
V členu 8 se „31. decembra 2004“ nadomesti z „31. januarja 2008“.
OJ L 252, 20.9.2002, p. 37.
UL L 252, 20.9.2002, str. 37.
Decision as amended by Decision 2004/426/EC (OJ L 154, 30.4.2004, p. 1, as corrected by OJ L 189, 27.5.2004, p. 1).
Odločba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo 2004/426/ES (UL L 154, 30.4.2004, str. 1).
Point 3 of the Annex to Decision 2002/757/EC is amended as follows:
Točka 3 Priloge k Odločbi 2002/757/ES se spremeni:
In the first sentence, ‘moved from the place of production’ is replaced by ‘moved within the Community’
V prvem stavku se „premeščati z mesta pridelave“ nadomesti z „v Skupnosti premeščati“.
In point (b), the following sentence is inserted before ‘or’:
V točki (b) se pred „ali“ vstavi naslednji stavek:
‘and, from 1 May 2007 onwards, carried out at least twice during the growing season at appropriate times when the plants are in active growth; the intensity of these inspections shall take into account the particular production system of the plants,’
„in, od 1. maja 2007 dalje, opravljenim vsaj dvakrat v obdobju rasti ob primernem času med aktivno rastjo rastlin; pri intenzivnosti teh pregledov je treba upoštevati posamezne pridelovalne sisteme rastlin“.
Point (c) is replaced by the following:
Točka (c) se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
in cases where signs of the harmful organism have been found on the plants at the place of production, appropriate procedures have been implemented aiming at eradicating the harmful organism, consisting at least of the following:
so se v primerih, ko so se na rastlinah na mestu pridelave ugotovila znamenja škodljivega organizma, izvedli ustrezni postopki, namenjeni izkoreninjenju škodljivega organizma, ki obsegajo vsaj:
destruction of the infected plants and all susceptible plants within 2 m radius of the infected plants, including associated growing media and plant debris,
uničenje okuženih rastlin in vseh občutljivih rastlin v oddaljenosti 2 m od okuženih rastlin, vključno s povezanim rastnim substratom in rastlinskim odpadkom;
for all susceptible plants within 10 m radius of the infected plants, and any remaining plants from the affected lot:
vse občutljive rastline v oddaljenosti 10 m od okuženih rastlin ter vse preostale rastline iz prizadete serije:
the plants have been retained at the place of production,
so bile zadržane na mestu pridelave,
official additional inspections have been carried out at least twice in the three months after the eradication measures have been taken when the plants are in active growth,
vsaj dvakrat v treh mesecih po sprejetih ukrepih izkoreninjenja v času aktivne rasti rastlin so bili opravljeni dodatni uradni pregledi,
while during this three months-period no treatments that may suppress symptoms of the harmful organism have been carried out,
hkrati pa v obdobju teh treh mesecev ni bilo tretiranj, ki bi lahko zatrla škodljive organizme,
the plants have been found free from the harmful organism in these official inspections,
ti uradni pregledi pri rastlinah niso odkrili okužbe s škodljivim organizmom;
for all other susceptible plants at the place of production, the plants have been subject to official intensive re-inspection following the finding and have been found free from the harmful organisms in these inspections,
vse druge občutljive rastline na mestu pridelave so bile po odkritju intenzivno ponovno pregledane in ti pregledi niso odkrili okužbe s škodljivim organizmom;
appropriate phytosanitary measures have been taken on the growing surface within a 2 m radius of infected plants.’
sprejetje fitosanitarnih ukrepov na pridelovalni površini v oddaljenosti 2 m od okuženih rastlin.“
By Commission Decision 2002/757/EC [2] the Member States were provisionally required to take emergency phytosanitary measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Community of Phytophthora ramorum Werres, De Cock & Man in ‘t Veld sp.nov. (hereinafter referred to as: ‘the harmful organism’).
Z Odločbo Komisije 2002/757/ES [2] se je od držav članic zahteval sprejem začasnih izrednih fitosanitarnih ukrepov za preprečevanje vnosa škodljivega organizma Phytophthora ramorum Werres, De Cock & Man in 't Veld sp. nov. v Skupnost in njegovega širjenja v Skupnosti (v nadaljevanju „škodljivi organizem“).
Paris, Adiantum jordanii C. Muell., Aesculus californica (Spach) Nutt., Aesculus hippocastanum L., Arbutus menziesii Pursch., Arbutus unedo L., Arctostaphylos spp.
Pariz, Adiantum jordanii C. Muell., Aesculus californica (Spach) Nutt., Aesculus hippocastanum L., Arbutus menziesii Pursch., Arbutus unedo L., Arctostaphylos spp.
(notified under document number C(2007) 1305)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2007) 1305)
Appendix B to Annex XII to the 2003 Act of Accession has been amended by Commission Decisions 2004/458/EC [2], 2004/471/EC [3], 2004/474/EC [4], 2005/271/EC [5], 2005/591/EC [6], 2005/854/EC [7], 2006/14/EC [8], 2006/196/EC [9], 2006/404/EC [10], 2006/555/EC [11] and 2006/935/EC [12].
Dodatek B k Prilogi XII k Aktu o pristopu iz leta 2003 je bil spremenjen z odločbami Komisije 2004/458/ES [2], 2004/471/ES [3], 2004/474/ES [4], 2005/271/ES [5], 2005/591/ES [6], 2005/854/ES [7], 2006/14/ES [8], 2006/196/ES [9], 2006/404/ES [10], 2006/555/ES [11] in 2006/935/ES [12].
OJ L 156, 30.4.2004, p. 53; corrected version in OJ L 202, 7.6.2004, p. 39.
UL L 156, 30.4.2004, str. 53.