natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The comparison of domestic net sales price with the adjusted cost of production during the RIP showed that no domestic sales were made in the ordinary course of trade pursuant of Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Primerjava domače neto prodajne cene s prilagojenimi stroški proizvodnje med OPP je pokazala, da domača prodaja ni potekala po običajnem poteku trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Articles 2(3) and 2(6) of the basic Regulation, normal value was constructed by adding to the applicants manufacturing costs of the product concerned, adjusted where necessary as mentioned in recital 19, a reasonable amount for SG&A costs and a reasonable amount for profit.
V skladu s členom 2(3) in (6) osnovne uredbe je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana tako, da so se vložnikovim proizvodnim stroškom za zadevni izdelek, ki so bili po potrebi prilagojeni, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 19, dodali razumni zneski za PSA-stroške in dobiček.
SG&A costs and profit could not be established on the basis of the introductory wording of Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation because the applicant did not have representative domestic sales of the product concerned in the ordinary course of trade.
PSA-stroški in dobiček niso mogli biti določeni v skladu s členom 2(6) osnovne uredbe, ker vložnik ni imel reprezentativne domače prodaje zadevnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovine.
Article 2(6)(a) of the basic Regulation could not be applied, since only the applicant is subject to the investigation.
Člena 2(6)(a) osnovne uredbe ni bilo mogoče uporabiti, ker je predmet preiskave le vložnik.
Article 2(6)(b) was not applicable either, since the applicants manufacturing cost for products belonging to the same general category of goods would also need to be adjusted in respect of gas costs, for the reasons indicated in recital 19.
Ravno tako ni bilo mogoče uporabiti člena 2(6)(b), saj bi morali zaradi razlogov, navedenih v uvodni izjavi 19, biti v zvezi s stroški plina prilagojeni tudi proizvodni stroški vložnika za izdelke, ki spadajo v enako splošno kategorijo blaga.
In this respect, consideration was given to publicly available information relating to major companies operating in the fertilisers business sector.
V zvezi s tem so bili proučeni javno dostopni podatki v zvezi z večjimi družbami, ki delujejo v sektorju poslovanja z gnojili.
It was found that the corresponding data from North American (USA and Canadian) producers would be the most appropriate for the purpose of the investigation, given the extensive availability of reliable and complete public financial information from listed companies in this region of the world.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da bi bili ustrezni podatki severnoameriških (ZDA in Kanada) proizvajalcev najprimernejši za namen preiskave, glede na veliko dostopnost zanesljivih in popolnih javnih finančnih informacij družb iz tega dela sveta, ki kotirajo na borzi.
Therefore, SG&A costs and profit were established on the basis of the weighted average SG&A costs and profit from three North American producers, which were found to be amongst the largest companies in the nitrogen fertilisers sector, with regard to their domestic sales of the same general category of products (nitrogen fertilisers).
Zato so bili PSA-stroški in dobiček določeni na podlagi tehtanega povprečja PSA-stroškov in dobička treh severnoameriških proizvajalcev, ki spadajo med največje družbe v sektorju dušikovih gnojil, glede na njihovo domačo prodajo enake kategorije izdelkov (dušikova gnojila).
These three producers were considered to be representative of the nitrogen fertilisers business and their SG&A costs and profit thereby representative of those normally incurred by companies operating successfully in that business segment.
Ti trije proizvajalci so se šteli za reprezentativne na področju poslovanja z dušikovimi gnojili, njihovi PSA-stroški in dobiček pa za reprezentativne običajne stroške in dobiček družb, ki uspešno delujejo na tem poslovnem področju.
It should be noted that there were no indications that the amount for profit so established exceeded the profit realised by other Ukrainian producers on sales of products of the same general category on their domestic market.
Treba je navesti, da ni bilo namigov o tem, da višina tako določenega dobička presega dobiček, ki so ga ustvarili drugi ukrajinski proizvajalci pri prodaji izdelkov enake splošne kategorije na domačem trgu.
Following the disclosure the applicant alleged that there was a significant difference between the market situation in North America and Ukraine.
Po razkritju je vložnik navedel, da med razmerami na trgu v Severni Ameriki in Ukrajini obstajajo velike razlike.
The applicant however failed to explain the alleged difference and to substantiate its claims.
Vendar pa vložnik te domnevne razlike ni pojasnil in ni utemeljil svojih trditev.
It also failed to propose any other reasonable basis for calculations, in the absence of which this argument had to be rejected.
Vložnik prav tako ni predlagal druge ustrezne osnove za izračune, zaradi česar je bilo treba ta argument zavrniti.
Since the product concerned was exported to independent customers in the Community, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, namely on the basis of the export price actually paid or payable.
Ker se je zadevni izdelek izvažal neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti, je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe, in sicer na podlagi izvoznih cen, ki so bile dejansko plačane ali se plačujejo.
The normal value and export price were compared on an ex-works basis and at the same level of trade.
Normalna vrednost in izvozna cena sta se primerjali na podlagi franko tovarna in na isti ravni trgovine.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences affecting price and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Za zagotovitev poštene primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno so bile opravljene ustrezne prilagoditve za razlike, ki so vplivale na cene in primerljivost cen v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
Accordingly, adjustments were made for differences in transport, handling, loading and ancillary costs, where applicable and supported by verified evidence.
V skladu s tem so bile izvedene prilagoditve za razlike v prevoznih, manipulativnih, nakladalnih in drugih tozadevnih stroških, kjer je bilo to primerno ter podprto s preverjenimi dokazi.
After disclosure, the association of Community producers argued that the rail tariffs in Ukraine for transport of, inter alia, the product concerned when exported to the Community were artificially low and therefore needed to be adjusted.
Po razkritju je združenje proizvajalcev Skupnosti trdilo, da so ukrajinske tarife za železniški prevoz med drugim tudi zadevnega izdelka pri izvozu v Evropsko skupnost umetno nizke in jih je zato treba prilagoditi.
The investigation did not reveal however that transport costs in Ukraine were not reasonably reflected in the records of the applicant.
Preiskava pa ni pokazala, da stroški prevoza v Ukrajini ne bi bili ustrezno prikazani v računovodskih evidencah vložnika.
This comparison showed a dumping margin of 38,2 %, expressed as a percentage of the cif Community frontier price, duty unpaid.
Ta primerjava je pokazala, da je stopnja dampinga 38,2 %, izražena kot odstotek cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve.
In this context, it was noted that the dumping margin currently applicable to the applicant was established in the original investigation using a normal value determined on the basis of data obtained from a producer in a market-economy third country in accordance with Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation.
V zvezi s tem je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila stopnja dampinga, ki sedaj velja za vložnika, v prvotni preiskavi določena z uporabo normalne vrednosti, določene na podlagi podatkov, pridobljenih od proizvajalca v tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom, v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe.
However, in the present review normal value was calculated based on information relating to the applicants own data in accordance with Article 2(1) to (6) of the basic Regulation, following the granting of market-economy status to Ukraine (amendment of the basic Regulation by Regulation (EC) No 2117/2005).
Vendar pa je bila v sedanjem pregledu skladno s členom 2(1) do (6) osnovne uredbe normalna vrednost izračunana na podlagi informacij, ki se nanašajo na vložnikove lastne podatke po dodelitvi statusa tržnega gospodarstva Ukrajini (sprememba osnovne uredbe z Uredbo (ES) št. 2117/2005).
There were no indications that the level of the normal value or the export price established for the applicant in the current investigation could not be considered of a lasting nature.
Ni bilo namigov o tem, da ravni normalne vrednosti ali izvozne cene, določene za vložnika v sedanji preiskavi, ne bi bilo mogoče označiti kot trajne.
It could be argued that the evolution of the prices of natural gas as the main raw material could have a significant influence on the normal value.
Lahko bi trdili, da lahko razvoj cen zemeljskega plina kot glavne surovine pomembno vpliva na normalno vrednost.
It was, however, considered that the effect of the price increase would affect all actors on the market and therefore have an impact on both the normal value and the export price.
Vendar pa obstaja mnenje, da bi rast cen vplivala na vse akterje na trgu in torej na normalno vrednost in tudi na izvozno ceno.
The export price of the applicant to the Community during the RIP was found to be similar to that of its exports to other countries, where considerably higher quantities were sold during the RIP.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bila izvozna cena vložnika v Skupnost med OPP podobna izvozni ceni izvoza vložnika v druge države, kjer je bila med OPP prodana znatno večja količina.
Therefore, although the dumping margin found in the RIP is based on a relatively low volume of exports of the applicant to the Community, there are reasons to consider that the dumping margin found is based on changed circumstances of a lasting nature.
Čeprav med OPP ugotovljena stopnja dampinga temelji na relativno nizkem izvozu vložnika v Skupnost, obstajajo razlogi, ki potrjujejo, da ugotovljena stopnja dampinga temelji na trajno spremenjenih okoliščinah.
Since in the original investigation the duty was imposed in the form of a specific amount per tonne, it should have the same form in the current investigation.
Ker je bila dajatev v prvotni preiskavi uvedena v obliki posebnega zneska na tono, je treba to obliko ohraniti tudi v sedanji preiskavi.
The duty calculated on the basis of the current margin of dumping would be EUR 47 per tonne.
Dajatev, izračunana na podlagi sedanje stopnje dampinga, bi znašala 47 EUR na tono.
It is recalled that, as outlined in recital 59 of Regulation (EC) No 132/2001, when imposing definitive measures in 2001, the injury margin was used when determining the amount of the definitive duty to be imposed in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
Treba je opomniti, da se je, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 59 Uredbe (ES) št. 132/2001, pri uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov leta 2001 stopnja škode uporabila pri določanju višine dokončne dajatve, ki se uvede v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve.
As defined by Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 442/2007, the duty currently in force depends on the specific product type and varies between EUR 29,26 per tonne and EUR 33,25 per tonne.
Kot je opredeljeno s členom 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 442/2007, je znesek veljavne dajatve odvisen od posebnega tipa izdelka in znaša med 29,26 EUR na tono in 33,25 EUR na tono.
The applicant expressed an interest in offering an undertaking but failed to submit a sufficiently substantiated undertaking offer within the deadlines set in Article 8(2) of the basic Regulation.
Vložnik je izrazil interes, da ponudi zavezo, vendar pa ni predložil dovolj utemeljene ponudbe za zavezo v rokih, določenih v členu 8(2) osnovne uredbe.
However, it is considered that the complexity of several issues, namely (1) the volatility of the price of the product concerned which would require some form of indexation of minimum prices, while at the same time the volatility is not sufficiently explained by the key cost driver; and (2) the particular market situation for the product concerned (inter alia, that there are limited imports from the exporter subject to this review) points to the need to consider whether an undertaking combining an indexed minimum price and a quantitative ceiling would be workable.
Vendar zapletenost nekaterih vprašanj, in sicer (1) nestanovitnost cene zadevnega izdelka, ki bi zahtevala določeno indeksacijo minimalnih cen, pri čemer pa ključno gonilo stroškov ne pojasnjuje zadostno nestanovitnosti, in (2) posebne razmere na trgu za zadevni izdelek (med drugim, da je uvoz izvoznika, ki je predmet tega pregleda, omejen), nakazuje potrebo po obravnavanju, ali bi bila zaveza v kombinaciji indeksirane minimalne cene in kvantitativne zgornje meje učinkovita.
As a result, the Council considers that the applicant should exceptionally be allowed to complete its undertaking offer beyond the statutory deadline but within 10 calendar days from entry into force of this Regulation.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj napisanega Svet meni, da je treba vložniku izjemoma dovoliti izpolnitev ponudbe za zavezo po zgoraj omenjenem roku, vendar v roku 10 koledarskih dni od začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
The partial interim of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of solid fertilisers with an ammonium nitrate content exceeding 80 % by weight originating in Ukraine, falling within CN codes 31023090, 31024090, ex31022900, ex31026000, ex31029000, ex31051000, ex31052010, ex31055100, ex31055900 and ex31059091, initiated pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, is hereby terminated without amending the anti-dumping measures in force.
Delni vmesni pregled protidampinških ukrepov, ki veljajo za uvoz trdnih gnojil z deležem amonijevega nitrata, ki presega 80 mas. %, uvrščenih pod oznake KN 31023090, 31024090, ex31022900, ex31026000, ex31029000, ex31051000, ex31052010, ex31055100, ex31055900 in ex31059091 in s poreklom iz Ukrajine, ki se je začel v skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96, se zaključi brez spremembe veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov.
Council Regulation (EC) No 238/2008
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 238/2008
terminating the partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of the anti-dumping duty on imports of solutions of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Russia
o zaključku delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 o protidampinški dajatvi za uvoz raztopin sečnine in amonijevega nitrata s poreklom iz Rusije
By Regulation (EC) No 1995/2000 [2], the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of solutions of urea and ammonium nitrate (UAN) originating, inter alia, in Russia.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1995/2000 [2] je Svet uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz raztopin sečnine in amonijevega nitrata („SAN“) s poreklom, med drugim, iz Rusije.
This Regulation will hereinafter be referred to as ‘the original Regulation’ and the investigation that led to the measures imposed by the original Regulation will be hereinafter referred to as ‘the original investigation’.
Ta uredba se v nadaljnjem besedilu imenuje „prvotna uredba“, preiskava, ki je privedla do ukrepov, uvedenih s prvotno uredbo, pa se v nadaljnjem besedilu imenuje „prvotna preiskava“.
Following an expiry review initiated in September 2005, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1911/2006 [3], renewed for five years these measures at their current level.
Po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa, ki se je začel septembra 2005, je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1911/2006 [3] za pet let obnovil te ukrepe na njihovi tedanji ravni.
This regulation will hereinafter be referred to as ‘the expiry Regulation’ and the investigation that led to the measures imposed by the expiry Regulation will be hereinafter referred to as ‘the expiry review’.
Ta uredba se v nadaljnjem besedilu imenuje „uredba zaradi izteka ukrepa“, preiskava, ki je privedla do ukrepov, uvedenih z uredbo zaradi izteka ukrepa, pa se v nadaljnjem besedilu imenuje „pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa“.
A request for a partial interim review (the present review) pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation was lodged by two exporting producers from Russia, belonging to the Joint Stock Company ‘Mineral and Chemical Company Eurochem’, namely Novomoskovskiy Azot and Nevinnomyssky Azot.
Zahtevo za delni vmesni pregled („sedanji pregled“) sta v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe vložila dva ruska proizvajalca izvoznika, ki spadata pod okrilje delniške družbe „Mineral and Chemical Company Eurochem“, in sicer Novomoskovskiy Azot in Nevinnomyssky Azot.
These two companies, due to their relationship, are treated as one legal entity (the applicant) for the purpose of the present review.
Ti dve podjetji se za namen sedanje preiskave zaradi medsebojnega razmerja obravnavata kot ena pravna oseba („vložnik“).
The applicant alleged that the comparison of its own normal value and, in the absence of exports to the European Community, export prices to an appropriate third country, in this case, the United States of America (USA), would lead to a reduction of dumping significantly below the level of the current measures.
Vložnik je navedel, da bi primerjava njegove lastne normalne vrednosti in, zaradi neobstoja izvoza v Evropsko skupnost, izvoznih cen v ustrezno tretjo državo, v tem primeru Združene države Amerike (ZDA), privedla do zmanjšanja dampinga precej pod stopnjo trenutnih ukrepov.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that the request contained sufficient prima facie evidence, the Commission announced on 19 December 2006 the initiation of a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation by a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [4].
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom je Komisija ugotovila, da je zahteva vsebovala zadostne dokaze prima facie, in 19. decembra 2006 z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [4], naznanila začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission officially informed the applicant, the representatives of the exporting country and the association of Community producers about the initiation of the review.
Komisija je o začetku preiskave uradno obvestila vložnika, predstavnike države izvoznice in združenje proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
In order to obtain the information deemed necessary for its investigation, the Commission sent questionnaires to Joint Stock Company ‘Mineral and Chemical Company Eurochem’ and its related companies and received replies within the deadlines set for that purpose.
Komisija je, da bi pridobila za preiskavo potrebne informacije, delniški družbi „Mineral and Chemical Company Eurochem“ in njenim povezanim podjetjem poslala vprašalnike, ti pa so jih izpolnjene vrnili v določenem roku.
The Commission carried out verification visits at the premises of the applicant and its related companies:
Komisija je preveritvene obiske izvedla v poslovnih prostorih vložnika in njegovih povezanih podjetij:
JSC Mineral and Chemical Company (Eurochem), Moscow, Russia,
JSC Mineral and Chemical Company (Eurochem), Moskva, Rusija,
PJSC Azot (NAK Azot), Novomoskovsk, Russia,
PJSC Azot (NAK Azot), Novomoskovsk, Rusija,
PJSC Nevinnomyssky Azot (Nevinka Azot), Nevinnomyssk, Russia, and
PJSC Nevinnomyssky Azot (Nevinka Azot), Nevinnomyssk, Rusija in
Eurochem Trading GmbH, Zug, Switzerland — (Eurochem Trading).
Eurochem Trading GmbH, Zug, Švica – (Eurochem Trading).
The product concerned is the same as in the original investigation, i.e. a solution of urea and ammonium nitrate, a liquid fertiliser commonly used in agriculture, originating in Russia (UAN).
Zadevni izdelek je izdelek iz prvotne preiskave, tj. raztopina sečnine in amonijevega nitrata, tekoče gnojilo, ki se pogosto uporablja v kmetijstvu, s poreklom iz Rusije („SAN“).
The water content is approximately 70 % of the mixture (depending on the nitrogen content), the remaining part consisting equally of urea and ammonium nitrate.
Vsebnost vode predstavlja približno 70 % mešanice (odvisno od vsebnosti dušika), preostali del pa je enakovredno sestavljen iz sečnine in amonijevega nitrata.
This review investigation confirmed that UAN is a pure commodity product, and its quality and basic physical characteristics are identical whatever the country of origin.
Ta preiskava v zvezi s pregledom je potrdila, da je SAN čist izdelek, njegova kakovost in osnovne fizikalne lastnosti pa so enake ne glede na poreklo.
The UAN solutions manufactured and sold by the applicant on its domestic market in Russia and, in the absence of exports to the European Community, those exported to the United States of America have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and essentially the same uses.
Raztopine SAN, ki jih proizvaja in prodaja vložnik na domačem trgu v Rusiji, in, zaradi neobstoja izvoza v Evropsko skupnost, raztopine, ki se izvažajo v Združene države Amerike, imajo enake osnovne fizikalne in kemične lastnosti in v glavnem enako uporabo.
Therefore, these products are considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se ti izdelki štejejo za podobne izdelke v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
As announced in the notice of initiation, since the applicant did not have export sales of UAN to the European Community during the RIP, the current investigation examined first to what extent export prices to a third country should be used in deciding whether the basis on which existing measures were established has changed and whether these changes are of a lasting nature.
Kot je navedeno v obvestilu o začetku in ker vložnik SAN v OPP ni izvažal v Evropsko skupnost, je bilo v sedanji preiskavi najprej preverjeno, do kolikšne mere je izvozne cene za tretjo državo treba uporabiti pri ugotavljanju, ali se je osnova, na kateri so bili določeni obstoječi ukrepi, spremenila in ali so te spremembe trajne.
The applicant supplied evidence that due to the duties in force, the product could not be sold for export to the Community market during the RIP.
Vložnik je predložil dokaze, da zaradi veljavnih dajatev izdelka v času OPP ni bilo mogoče izvoziti na trg Skupnost.
The applicant provided prima facie evidence that export prices to the USA, a representative third market, were not dumped or at least to a lesser extent than the dumping margin currently established for exports to the European Community and that it was appropriate to use export prices to the USA.
Vložnik je predložil dokaze prima facie o tem, da izvozne cene za ZDA, ki je reprezentativni tretji trg, niso bile dampinške ali so bile dampinške vsaj v manjši meri kot stopnja dampinga, ki trenutno velja za izvoz v Evropsko skupnost, in da je primerno uporabiti izvozne cene v ZDA.
For the reasons set out in recital 43 and following, export prices to the third country USA were found to be appropriate because the US market was comparable to the Community market and therefore representative.
Iz razlogov, navedenih v spodnji uvodni izjavi (43) in naslednjih, je bilo ugotovljeno, da so izvozne cene za tretjo državo ZDA ustrezne, saj je ameriški trg primerljiv s trgom Skupnosti in zato reprezentativen.
It should be noted that the measures currently applicable are partly based on data not linked to the applicant’s own production and sales of the product concerned, while during the current RIP verified information related to the applicant’s own data pertaining to the normal value and export prices, albeit to a third country market, was available.
Treba je opozoriti na to, da trenutno veljavni ukrepi delno temeljijo na podatkih, ki niso povezani z vložnikovo lastno proizvodnjo in prodajo zadevnega izdelka, medtem ko so bile med sedanjim OPP na voljo preverjene informacije, povezane z vložnikovimi lastnimi podatki v zvezi z normalno vrednostjo in izvoznimi cenami, čeprav za trg tretje države.