natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for its analyses and carried out verification visits at the premises of the following companies:
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za njene analize ter opravila preveritvene obiske v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Sampled Community producers
Vzorčeni proizvajalci Skupnosti
Fertiberia S.A., Madrid, Spain,
Fertiberia S.A., Madrid, Španija,
Nitrogénművek Zrt., Pétfűrdo, Hungary,
Nitrogénművek Zrt., Pétfűrdo, Madžarska,
SKW Stickstoffwerke Piesteritz GmbH, Lutherstadt Wittenberg, Germany,
SKW Stickstoffwerke Piesteritz GmbH, Lutherstadt Wittenberg, Nemčija,
Yara S.A., Brussels, Belgium and its related producer Yara Sluiskil B.V., Sluiskil, The Netherlands;
Yara S.A., Brussels, Belgija in njen povezan proizvajalec Yara Sluiskil B.V., Sluiskil, Nizozemska;
Sampled exporting producers in Russia
Vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki v Rusiji
OJSC Azot (NAK Azot), Novomoskovsk, Russia, and
OJSC Azot (NAK Azot), Novomoskovsk, Rusija in
OJSC Nevinnomyssky Azot (Nevinka Azot), Nevinnomyssk, Russia,
OJSC Nevinnomyssky Azot (Nevinka Azot), Nevinnomyssk, Rusija,
JSC Minudobrenia, Perm, Russia,
JSC Minudobrenia, Perm, Rusija,
JSC Acron, Velikij Novgorod, Russia.
JSC Acron, Velikij Novgorod, Rusija.
The product concerned is the same as in the original investigation and in the previous expiry review investigation, i.e. urea falling within CN codes 31021010 and 31021090 and originating in Russia.
Zadevni izdelek je isti kot v prvotni preiskavi in prejšnji preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom, tj. sečnina, ki je trenutno uvrščena pod oznaki KN 31021010 in 31021090, s poreklom iz Rusije.
Urea is produced mainly from ammonia, which in turn is produced from natural gas.
Sečnina se običajno izdeluje iz amoniaka, ki se pridobiva iz zemeljskega plina.
It may take a solid or a liquid form.
Lahko je v trdni ali tekoči obliki.
Solid urea can be used for agricultural and industrial purposes.
Sečnina v trdni obliki se lahko uporablja za kmetijske ali industrijske namene.
Agricultural grade urea can be used either as a fertiliser, which is spread onto the soil, or as an animal feed additive.
Sečnina za kmetijske namene se lahko uporablja kot gnojilo, ki se raztrese po zemlji, ali kot dodatek v krmi za živali.
Industrial grade urea is a raw material for certain glues and plastics.
Sečnina za industrijske namene je surovina za nekatera lepila in plastiko.
Liquid urea can be used both as a fertiliser and for industrial purposes.
Sečnina v tekoči obliki se lahko uporablja kot gnojilo in za industrijske namene.
Although urea is presented in the different forms mentioned above, its chemical properties remain basically the same and may be regarded for the purposes of the present proceeding as one product.
Čeprav je lahko sečnina, kot je navedeno zgoraj, različnih vrst, so njihove kemijske lastnosti v bistvu iste in se lahko za sedanji postopek štejejo kot en sam izdelek.
As established in the original investigation and the previous expiry review investigation, the current review investigations confirmed that the product concerned and the urea produced and sold by the Community producers on the Community market, as well as the urea produced and sold on the Russian domestic market have the same basic chemical characteristics and essentially the same uses.
Kot je bilo ugotovljeno v prvotni preiskavi in prejšnji preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom, sta sedanji preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom potrdili, da imajo zadevni izdelek in sečnina, ki jo proizvajalci Skupnosti proizvajajo in prodajajo na trgu Skupnosti, ter sečnina, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na ruskem domačem trgu, enake osnovne kemijske lastnosti ter enako uporabo.
They are therefore considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Torej veljajo v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe za podobne izdelke.
Continuation of dumping during the review investigation period
Nadaljevanje dampinga med obdobjem preiskave v zvezi s pregledom
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether dumping was taking place during the RIP and, if so, whether or not the expiry of the measures would be likely to lead to a continuation of dumping.
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe se je proučilo, ali je damping med OPP obstajal in ali je v tem primeru verjetno, da bi iztek ukrepov povzročil nadaljevanje ali ponovitev dampinga.
As mentioned in recital (16), five Russian exporting producers of urea cooperated in the investigation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 16, je v preiskavi sodelovalo pet ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov sečnine.
These five producers represented 60 % of exports of urea originating in Russia to the Community during the RIP, which corresponded to 1,39 million tonnes.
Teh pet proizvajalcev je med OPP predstavljalo 60 % izvoza sečnine s poreklom iz Rusije v Skupnost, kar je ustrezalo 1,39 milijona ton.
Imports into the Community of the product concerned originating in Russia represented 16 % of Community consumption, which was 8,98 million tonnes in the RIP.
Uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Rusije v Skupnost je med OPP predstavljal 16 % potrošnje Skupnosti, kar je ustrezalo 8,98 milijonom ton med OPP.
Therefore, the level of cooperation is considered high.
Zato se šteje, da je stopnja sodelovanja visoka.
It should be noted that one exporting producer controls two related companies, both of which are producing and exporting urea.
Opozoriti je treba, da en proizvajalec izvoznik nadzoruje dve povezani družbi, ki proizvajata in izvažata sečnino.
The sample referred to in recital (19) therefore includes four companies.
Vzorec iz uvodne izjave 19 zato vključuje štiri družbe.
It was first established for each of the four companies whether their total domestic sales of urea were representative in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, i.e. whether they accounted for 5 % or more of the total sales volume of the product concerned exported to the Community.
Komisija je za vsako od štirih družb najprej preverila, ali je njena celotna domača prodaja sečnine reprezentativna v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe, tj. ali predstavlja vsaj 5 % ali več celotnega obsega prodaje zadevnega izdelka, ki se izvaža v Skupnost.
The investigation showed that all four companies sold representative quantities of urea on the domestic market.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so vse štiri družbe prodajale reprezentativno količino sečnine na domačem trgu.
To establish whether sales of urea on the domestic market were in the ordinary course of trade, the cost of manufacturing had to be established.
Za ugotovitev, ali je bila prodaja sečnine na domačem trgu opravljena v običajnem poteku trgovine, je treba določiti stroške proizvodnje.
In this regard, it should be noted that energy costs, such as electricity and gas, represent a major proportion of the manufacturing cost and a significant proportion of the total cost of production.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da predstavljajo stroški energije, kot sta elektrika in plin, glavni delež proizvodnih stroškov in znaten delež skupnih proizvodnih stroškov.
It was therefore examined, pursuant to Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation, whether the costs associated with the production and sales of the product under consideration were reasonably reflected in the records of the parties concerned.
Zato se je v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe proučilo, ali so bili stroški proizvodnje in prodaje obravnavanega izdelka v računovodskih evidencah zadevnih strank ustrezno prikazani.
The investigation showed no indication that the electricity would not be reasonably reflected in the records.
Iz preiskave ni bilo razvidno, da električna energija v evidencah ne bi bila ustrezno prikazana.
In this context, it is, inter alia, noted that electricity prices paid by the Russian producers during the RIP were in line with international market prices, when compared to other countries, such as Canada and Norway.
V zvezi s tem je bilo med drugim ugotovljeno, da so bile cene električne energije, ki so jih med OPP plačevali ruski proizvajalci, v skladu z mednarodnimi tržnimi cenami, kar je pokazala primerjava z drugimi državami, kot sta Kanada in Norveška.
However, the same could not be said with regard to gas prices.
Vendar pa to ne velja za cene plina.
As concerns gas supplies, in fact, it was established on the basis of data published by internationally recognised sources specialised in energy markets, that the prices paid by the Russian producers were abnormally low.
V zvezi z oskrbo s plinom je bilo na podlagi podatkov, ki so jih objavili mednarodno priznani viri, specializirani za energetske trge, dejansko ugotovljeno, da je bila cena, ki so jo plačevali ruski proizvajalci, nenormalno nizka.
By way of illustration, they amounted to one fifth of the export price of natural gas from Russia and were also significantly lower than the gas price paid by the Community producers.
Za primerjavo, znašale so eno petino izvozne cene zemeljskega plina iz Rusije in so bile znatno nižje kot cene pline, ki so jih plačevali proizvajalci Skupnosti.
In this regard, all available data indicate that domestic gas prices in Russia were regulated prices, which are far below market prices paid in unregulated markets for natural gas.
V zvezi s tem vsi razpoložljivi podatki kažejo, da so bile domače cene plina v Rusiji nadzorovane in so precej nižje od tržnih cen, ki veljajo na nenadzorovanih trgih zemeljskega plina.
Since gas costs were not reasonably reflected in the four companies’ records, they had to be adjusted pursuant to Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation.
Ker stroški plina v računovodskih evidencah štirih družb niso bili ustrezno prikazani, jih je bilo treba prilagoditi v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe.
The cost of manufacturing of the sampled companies was adjusted accordingly.
Stroški proizvodnje vzorčenih družb so bili ustrezno prilagojeni.
In the absence of any undistorted gas prices relating to the Russian domestic market, and in accordance with Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation, gas prices had to be established on ‘any other reasonable basis, including information from other representative markets’.
Ker na ruskem domačem trgu ni neizkrivljenih cen plina, je bilo treba cene plina v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe določiti na „kateri koli drugi ustrezni podlagi, vključno z informacijami z drugih reprezentativnih trgov“.
The adjusted price was based on the average price of Russian gas when sold for export at the German/Czech border (Waidhaus), net of transport costs.
Prilagojena cena je temeljila na povprečni ceni ruskega plina pri prodaji za izvoz na nemško/češki meji („Waidhaus“) in neto stroških prevoza.
Waidhaus being the main hub for Russian gas sales to the EU, which is both the largest market for Russian gas and has prices reasonably reflecting costs, can be considered a representative market.
Waidhaus, glavno vozlišče za prodajo ruskega plina v EU, ki je največji trg za ruski plin in na katerem cene ustrezno odražajo stroške, se lahko šteje za reprezentativen trg.
After adjusting costs of manufacturing as described above, only two companies had representative domestic sales in the ordinary course of trade.
Po zgoraj opisani prilagoditvi stroškov proizvodnje sta imeli samo dve družbi reprezentativno domačo prodajo v običajnem poteku trgovine.
For these two companies therefore, normal value was based on their domestic sales of the like product pursuant to Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost za ti družbi je bila zato določena na podlagi njune domače prodaje podobnega izdelka v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
For the other two companies, normal value was established on the basis of the domestic sales prices of the two producers having representative domestic sales in the ordinary course of trade mentioned in recital 35, pursuant to Article 2(1) of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost za ostali družbi je bila določena na podlagi domačih prodajnih cen dveh proizvajalcev, ki imata reprezentativno domačo prodajo v običajnem poteku trgovine iz uvodne izjave 35, v skladu s členom 2(1) osnovne uredbe.
For confidentiality reasons, this information could not be disclosed in detail, as one of the two companies from which information was taken was related to a company for which normal value was established.
Zaradi zaupnosti te informacije ni mogoče popolnoma razkriti, ker je ena od dveh družb, ki je predložila informacije, povezana z družbo, za katero je bila določena normalna vrednost.
Therefore, if the information had been disclosed, it would have been possible for that company to reconstruct business confidential data of the other company.
Če bi bila ta informacija razkrita, bi lahko navedena družba pridobila zaupne poslovne informacije druge družbe.
In all cases where the product concerned was exported to independent customers in the Community, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, namely on the basis of export prices actually paid or payable.
V vseh primerih, kjer se je zadevni izdelek izvozil neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti, je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe, in sicer na podlagi izvoznih cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo.
In the case of one exporting producer where sales were made via a related trader in Switzerland, the export price was constructed on the basis of the resale prices of that related trader to independent customers.
V primeru enega proizvajalca izvoznika, kjer je prodaja potekala prek povezanega trgovca v Švici, je bila izvozna cena konstruirana na podlagi cen pri nadaljnji prodaji tega povezanega trgovca neodvisnim strankam.
Adjustments were made for all costs incurred between purchase and resale, including freight, sales, general and administrative expenses, and a reasonable profit margin.
Prilagojeni so bili vsi stroški, ki so nastali med nakupom in nadaljnjo prodajo, vključno s stroški prevoza, prodaje, splošnimi in administrativnimi stroški ter ustrezno stopnja dobička.
The normal value and export price were compared on an ex-works basis.
Normalna vrednost in izvozna cena sta bili primerjani na podlagi cene franko tovarna.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences affecting price and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Za zagotovitev pravične primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno so bile narejene prilagoditve za razlike, ki so vplivale na cene in primerljivost cen v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
Accordingly, adjustments were made for differences in transport, handling, loading and ancillary costs, credit costs, commissions and packing costs where applicable and supported by verified evidence.
V skladu s tem in kjer je bilo to primerno ter podprto s preverjenimi dokazi, so bile izvedene prilagoditve za razlike v prevoznih, manipulativnih stroških, stroških natovarjanja in drugih tozadevnih stroških, stroških kredita, provizij in pakiranja.
The dumping margin for each exporting producer was established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with a weighted average export price, in accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe je bila za vsakega proizvajalca izvoznika določena stopnja dampinga na podlagi primerjave med tehtano povprečno normalno vrednostjo in tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno.
The investigation showed that dumping took place during the RIP mostly at a lower level than in the previous expiry review investigation.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je bil damping med OPP večinoma na nižji stopnji kot v prejšnji preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom.
The dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Community frontier price, duty unpaid, are nevertheless substantial, i.e. in the range of 6 % to 23 %.
Stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, pa so kljub temu znatne, gibajo se med 6 % in 23 %.
Likelihood of Continuation of Dumping
Verjetnost nadaljevanja dampinga
Effect of the removal of the existing measures on the dumped imports
Učinek odprave obstoječih ukrepov proti dampinškemu uvozu
As mentioned in recital 1, the measures in force are in the form of a MIP of EUR 115 per tonne.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 1, obstoječi ukrepi v obliki MIP znašajo 115 EUR na tono.
While this MIP initially had an influence on Russian export prices of urea to the Community, such prices have been significantly above the MIP since 2003 as shown in recital 67, and during the RIP average Russian export prices have been 68 % above the MIP.
Medtem ko je MIP sprva vplival na ruske izvozne cene sečnine v Skupnost, so bile, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 67, take cene po letu 2003 znatno nad MIP, tako so bile povprečne ruske izvozne cene med OPP za 68 % višje od MIP.
It can therefore be concluded that the measures currently in force had no impact on either prices or quantities of exports of urea originating in Russia.
Zato se lahko sklene, da obstoječi ukrepi niso vplivali na cene ali količino izvoza sečnine s poreklom iz Rusije.
As a consequence, it is unlikely that there will be an impact on prices or quantities of exports of urea originating in Russia should measures be repealed.
Zato ni verjetno, da bi razveljavitev ukrepov vplivala na cene ali količino izvoza sečnine s poreklom iz Rusije.
Notwithstanding the above, the possible effects of (i) existing Russian spare capacity and possible new capacity and (ii) the likelihood of redirection of other sales to the Community were also examined in the investigation, as explained below.
Ne glede na zgoraj navedeno so bili v preiskavi proučeni tudi možni vplivi (i) obstoječih ruskih neizkoriščenih zmogljivosti in možnih novih zmogljivosti ter (ii) verjetnost preusmeritve ostale prodaje v Skupnosti, kot je pojasnjeno spodaj.
The applicant has submitted evidence in its review request that there will be a total of nine projects, which would provide substantial new capacity in Russia in the timeframe of 2005 to 2007 due to revamps, upgrades and de-bottlenecking, accounting for an increase of at least 10 % of the existing capacity.
Vložnik je v svojem zahtevku za pregled predložil dokaze o skupaj devetih projektih, ki bi v časovnem okviru 2005–2007 v Rusiji zagotovili znatne nove zmogljivosti in s prenovami, nadgradnjami in boljšo organizacijo pomenili vsaj 10-odstotno povečanje glede na obstoječe zmogljivosti.
Cooperating producers
Sodelujoči proizvajalci
The possible effects of the existing spare capacity were examined.
Proučili so se tudi možni vplivi prostih zmogljivosti.
The Russian sampled producers managed to increase their production capacity by around 5 %, while they increased their production by around 15 % during the period considered.
Ruski vzorčeni proizvajalci so v obravnavanem obdobju povečali svojo proizvodno zmogljivost za približno 5 %, proizvodnjo pa za približno 15 %.
Therefore, their nominal spare capacity has significantly decreased to 170000 tonnes, or around 6 % of production capacity:
Zato so se njihove nominalne proste zmogljivosti znatno zmanjšale, in sicer na 170000 ton oziroma približno 6 % proizvodne zmogljivosti.
Spare Capacity
Proste zmogljivosti
A total of five projects out of the nine referred to in the request concerned cooperating exporting producers.
Skupno pet od devetih projektov, navedenih v zahtevku, je povezanih s sodelujočimi proizvajalci izvozniki.
Two projects were already completed during the period considered, and therefore provide no additional capacity compared to the RIP.
Dva projekta sta bila med obravnavanim obdobjem že dokončana in zato v primerjavi z OPP ne pomenita nobene dodatne zmogljivosti.
For one project listed, only an insignificant capacity increase was established.
Za en navedeni projekt je bilo ugotovljeno samo majhno povečanje zmogljivosti.
As regards the two largest projects, which account for the majority of the capacity increase mentioned in recital 46, it was established that the company invests not only in urea capacity, but also in downstream production facilities for products such as urea-formaldehyde resins (UFR) and urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN).
V zvezi z največjima projektoma, ki pomenita večji del povečanja zmogljivosti, navedenega v uvodni izjavi 46, je bilo ugotovljeno, da družba ne vlaga samo v zmogljivosti proizvodnje sečnine, ampak tudi v obrate v nadaljnjem proizvodnem procesu za izdelke kot so urea-formaldehidne smole (UFR) in raztopina sečnine ter amonijevega nitrata (UAN).
These projects are either in an advanced stage or have already been completed post-RIP.
Ti projekti so v napredni fazi ali pa so bili po OPP že dokončani.
Therefore, it can be assumed that the major part of the capacity of this project will not be sold to independent customers, but captively used as a feedstock for these downstream products.
Zato se lahko predvideva, da glavni del zmogljivosti tega projekta ne bo prodan neodvisnim strankam, ampak bo uporabljen za razvoj izdelkov v nadaljnjem proizvodnem procesu.
This part is therefore not taken into account in the following paragraph.
Ta del se zato v naslednjem odstavku ne upošteva.
It follows from the above that the three projects would lead to an additional capacity available for sale to independent customers estimated at around 150000 to 200000 tonnes.
Iz zgoraj navedenega se sklene, da bi ti trije projekti pomenili dodatno zmogljivost, ki bi bila na voljo za prodajo neodvisnim strankam, in sicer približno 150000–200000 ton.
This corresponds to 10 % to 15 % of total Russian exports to the Community during the RIP or a potential market share of 1,5 % to 2 % of the Community market.
To ustreza 10–15 % celotnega ruskega izvoza v Skupnost med OPP ali možnemu tržnemu deležu 1,5–2 % na trgu Skupnosti.
Non-cooperating producers
Nesodelujoči proizvajalci
The overall spare capacity as a percentage of production capacity in Russia is in line with the spare capacity established for the cooperating producers, according to information submitted by the applicant.
Glede na podatke, ki jih je predložil vložnik, so skupne neizkoriščene zmogljivosti, izražene v odstotku proizvodne zmogljivosti v Rusiji, skladne z neizkoriščenimi zmogljivostmi, ki so določene za sodelujoče proizvajalce.
It is therefore considered that the non-cooperating producers have a spare capacity of around 5 % of production capacity as well, assessed to be around 140000 tonnes during the RIP.
Zato se šteje, da imajo tudi nesodelujoči proizvajalci približno 5 % neizkoriščenih proizvodnih zmogljivosti, kar je po ocenah približno 140000 ton v OPP.
A total of four projects out of the nine referred to in the request concerned non-cooperating exporting producers.
Skupno štirje od devetih projektov iz zahtevka zadevajo nesodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike.
These projects were evaluated on the basis of facts available.
Ti projekti so bili ocenjeni na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev.
For one project, it was established that it was not regarding the product concerned, but methanol.
Za en projekt je bilo ugotovljeno, da ni v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom, ampak z metanolom.
One project was already completed during the period considered, and therefore provides no additional capacity compared to the RIP.
En projekt je bil med obravnavanim obdobjem že dokončan in zato v primerjavi z OPP ne pomeni nobene dodatne zmogljivosti.
One project was related to an insignificant investment of less than EUR 1 million p.a. and was therefore deemed not to have a quantifiable impact on Russian capacity.
En projekt je bil ocenjen kot nepomembna naložba v znesku manj kot milijon EUR, zato je bilo ocenjeno, da nima znatnega vpliva na ruske zmogljivosti.
As for the remaining project, it could lead to a capacity increase of around 100000 tonnes (corresponding to about 7 % of total Russian exports to the Community during the RIP or a potential market share of 1 % of the Community market).
Preostali projekt pa bi lahko pomenil povečanje zmogljivosti za približno 100000 ton (kar ustreza približno 7 % celotnega ruskega izvoza v Skupnost med OPP ali možen dvig tržnega deleža na trgu Skupnosti za 1 %).