natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
repealing Regulation (EC) No 1819/2004 derogating from Regulation (EC) No 1342/2003 as regards the period for reflection for the issue of certain export licences for cereals, rice and cereal products
o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1819/2004 o odstopanju od Uredbe (ES) št. 1342/2003 glede obdobja za obravnavo za izdajo nekaterih izvoznih dovoljenj za žita, riž in žitne proizvode
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals [1], and in particular Articles 9(2) and 18 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1784/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003 o skupni ureditvi trga za žita [1] in zlasti členov 9(2) in 18 Uredbe,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice [2], and in particular Articles 10(2) and 19 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1785/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003 o skupni ureditvi trga za riž [2] in zlasti členov 10(2) in 19 Uredbe,
The first subparagraph of Article 8(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1342/2003 of 28 July 2003 laying down special detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences for cereals and rice [3] states that export licences for the products referred to in that subparagraph must be issued on the third working day after applications are lodged, provided that no special measures are taken in the meanwhile.
Prvi pododstavek člena 8(1) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1342/2003 z dne 28. julija 2003 o posebnih podrobnih pravilih za uporabo sistema uvoznih in izvoznih dovoljenj za žita in riž [3] določa, da se izvozna dovoljenja za proizvode iz navedenega pododstavka izdajo tretji delovni dan po vložitvi zahtevkov, če Komisija medtem ne uvede kakšnih posebnih ukrepov.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1819/2004 [4] derogates from this provision so as to take into account the supply situation on the Community market in cereals and rice for the 2004/05 marketing year.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1819/2004 [4] je odstopala od te določbe, da je upoštevala stanje v preskrbi trga Skupnosti z žitaricami in rižem za tržno leto 2004/2005.
Under this derogation, the licences in question are issued on the day the application is filed when the amount of the refund is zero.
Ob uporabi tega odstopanja se zadevna dovoljenja izdajo na dan vložitve zahtevka, kadar je znesek nadomestila enak nič.
Since the market conditions justifying this derogation no longer apply, Regulation (EC) No 1819/2004 should be repealed.
Ker tržne razmere, ki upravičujejo to odstopanje, več ne obstajajo, je primerno, da se Uredba (ES) št. 1819/2004 razveljavi.
Regulation (EC) No 1819/2004 is hereby repealed.
Uredba (ES) št. 1819/2004 se razveljavi.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1996/2006 (OJ L 398, 30.12.2006, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1996/2006 (UL L 398, 30.12.2006, str. 1).
OJ L 320, 21.10.2004, p. 13.
UL L 320, 21.10.2004, str. 13.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 191/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 191/2007
To avoid this situation, applications for system B licences for lemons after 23 February 2007 should be rejected until the end of the current export period,
V izogib takšnemu stanju je treba zavrniti zahtevke za dovoljenja sistema B za limone, izvožene po 23. februarju 2007, do konca tekočega izvoznega obdobja –
Applications for system B export licences for lemons submitted pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1510/2006, export declarations for which are accepted after 23 February and before 1 March 2007, are hereby rejected.
Zahtevki za izvozna dovoljenja sistema B za limone, vloženi v skladu s členom 1 Uredbe (ES) št. 1510/2006, za katere se odobrijo izvozne deklaracije po 23. februarju in pred 1. marcem 2007, se zavrnejo.
Council Regulation (EC) No 192/2007
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 192/2007
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Republic of Korea, Thailand and Taiwan following an expiry review and a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(2) and Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz določenega polietilen tereftalata s poreklom iz Indije, Indonezije, Malezije, Republike Koreje, Tajske in Tajvana po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov in delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(2) in 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Articles 11(2) and 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“) in zlasti člena 11(2) in 11(3) Uredbe,
On 27 November 2000, the Council imposed, by Regulation (EC) No 2604/2000 [2], definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating in India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan and Thailand (the countries concerned).
Svet je 27. novembra 2000 z Uredbo (ES) št. 2604/2000 [2] uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz določenega polietilen tereftalata („PET“) s poreklom iz Indije, Indonezije, Malezije, Republike Koreje, Tajvana in Tajske („zadevne države“).
The measures imposed had been based on an anti-dumping investigation (the original investigation) initiated pursuant to Article 5 of the basic Regulation.
Uvedeni ukrepi so temeljili na protidampinški preiskavi („prvotna preiskava“), uvedeni v skladu s členom 5 osnovne uredbe.
On 13 August 2004, the Council imposed, by Regulation (EC) No 1467/2004 [3], definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain PET originating in Australia and the People's Republic of China (PRC) and terminated the proceeding on imports of PET originating in Pakistan.
Svet je 13. avgusta 2004 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1467/2004 [3] uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz določenega PET s poreklom iz Avstralije in Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) in končal postopek za uvoz PET s poreklom iz Pakistana.
The amendments made to Regulation (EC) No 2604/2000 were the results of either review investigations initiated pursuant to Article 11(3) and (4) of the basic Regulation or of price undertakings being accepted under Article 8(1) thereof.
Spremembe Uredbe (ES) št. 2604/2000 so bile posledica preiskav, uvedenih v skladu s členom 11(3) in (4) osnovne uredbe ali cenovne zaveze, sprejete v skladu z njenim členom 8(1).
Request for reviews
Zahtevek za preglede
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry [4], the Commission, on 30 August 2005, received a request to review the measures in force pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation (expiry review), and to partially review the measures imposed on imports from Taiwan and on imports from three exporting producers in the Republic of Korea pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation (partial interim review).
Po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku [4] je Komisija 30. avgusta 2005 prejela zahtevek za pregled veljavnih ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe („pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov“) in za delni pregled ukrepov, uvedenih za uvoz iz Tajvana in uvoz treh proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Republike Koreje v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe („delni vmesni pregled“).
The request was lodged by the Polyethylene Terephthalate Committee of Plastics Europe (the applicant) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 90 %, of total Community production of PET.
Zahtevek je vložil Evropski odbor plastike za polietilen tereftalat („vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 90 % celotne proizvodnje PET.
The request for the expiry review was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury to the Community industry.
Zahtevek za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov je temeljil na izhodišču, da bi se zaradi izteka veljavnosti teh ukrepov damping in škoda za industrijo Skupnosti verjetno nadaljevala ali ponovno pojavila.
The request for the partial interim review of the measures on imports from Taiwan and imports originating from three exporting producers in the Republic of Korea (Daehan Synthetic Fiber Co. Ltd, SK Chemicals Co. Ltd and KP Chemical Corp.) was based on the grounds that the level of the measures was not sufficient to counteract the injurious dumping.
Zahtevek za delni vmesni pregled ukrepov za uvoz iz Tajvana in uvoz s poreklom od treh proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Republike Koreje (Daehan Synthetic Fiber Co. Ltd., SK Chemicals Co. Ltd. in KP Chemical Corp.) je temeljil na izhodišču, da raven ukrepov ne zadostuje za preprečitev škodljivega dampinga.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of the two reviews, pursuant to Articles 11(2) and 11(3) of the basic Regulation respectively, the Commission initiated these reviews on 1 December 2005 [5].
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom je Komisija ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregledov v skladu s členom 11(2) oziroma 11(3) osnovne uredbe, zato je 1. decembra 2005 začela te preglede [5].
A Notice regarding the scope of the interim review was published in the Official Journal on 2 June 2006 [6] making clear that the scope of the partial interim review also included all related companies.
Obvestilo glede obsega vmesnega pregleda je bilo objavljeno v Uradnem listu dne 2. junija 2006 [6] z jasno navedbo, da obseg delnega vmesnega pregleda vključuje tudi vse povezane družbe.
On 1 December 2005, the Commission also initiated a review pursuant to Article 18 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 [7] on the countervailing measures in force on imports of PET originating in India.
Komisija je 1. decembra 2005 začela tudi pregled v skladu s členom 18 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2026/97 [7] o izravnalnih ukrepih za uvoz PET s poreklom iz Indije.
The Commission officially advised the exporting producers, the representatives of the exporting countries, importers, Community producers, users and the applicant of the initiation of the expiry review and the partial interim review.
Komisija je uradno obvestila proizvajalce izvoznike, predstavnike držav izvoznic, uvoznike, proizvajalce Skupnosti, uporabnike in vložnike o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov in delnem vmesnem pregledu.
In view of the apparent large number of Indian, Indonesian, Korean and Taiwanese exporting producers as well as Community producers and importers listed in the request for the expiry review and the number of Taiwanese exporting producers listed in the request for the interim review, it was considered appropriate, in conformity with Article 17 of the basic Regulation, to examine whether sampling should be used.
Glede na veliko število indijskih, indonezijskih, korejskih in tajvanskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ter proizvajalcev Skupnosti in uvoznikov, navedenih v zahtevku za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov in številnih tajvanskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, navedenih v zahtevku za vmesni pregled, se je zdelo primerno, da se v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe prouči, ali naj se uporabi vzorčenje.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the parties were requested, pursuant to Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, to make themselves known within 15 days of the initiation of the reviews and to provide the Commission with the information requested in the notice of initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, so bile zgoraj navedene stranke pozvane, naj se v skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe v 15 dneh po začetku pregledov javijo Komisiji in predložijo informacije, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku pregleda.
After examination of the information submitted, given the low number of exporting producers in India, Indonesia, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan indicating their willingness to cooperate, it was decided that sampling was not necessary as regards exporting producers in these four countries.
Po pregledu predloženih informacij je bilo glede na majhno število proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Indije, Indonezije, Republike Koreje in Tajvana, ki so izrazili pripravljenost za sodelovanje, sklenjeno, da vzorčenje v zvezi s proizvajalci izvozniki iz teh štirih držav ni potrebno.
Having examined the information submitted by Community producers and importers, and considering that their number was not excessive, it was decided to include all of them and that sampling was not necessary.
Po proučitvi informacij, ki so jih predložili proizvajalci Skupnosti in uvozniki, ter ob upoštevanju, da njihovo število ni prekomerno, je bilo sklenjeno, da se vključijo vsi in da vzorčenje ni potrebno.
Questionnaires were therefore sent to all known exporting producers in the countries concerned, importers, suppliers, Community producers and users.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani vsem znanim proizvajalcem izvoznikom v zadevnih državah, uvoznikom, dobaviteljem, proizvajalcem Skupnosti in uporabnikom.
Replies to the questionnaires were received from:
Izpolnjene vprašalnike so poslali:
three exporting producers in India,
trije proizvajalci izvozniki iz Indije,
three exporting producers in Indonesia (although only two of these decided to accept a verification visit),
trije proizvajalci izvozniki iz Indonezije (čeprav sta se le dva odločila, da sprejmeta preveritveni obisk),
two exporting producers in Malaysia,
dva proizvajalca izvoznika iz Malezije,
four exporting producers in the Republic of Korea,
štirje proizvajalci izvozniki iz Republike Koreje,
three exporting producers in Taiwan (although only two of these decided to accept a verification visit),
trije proizvajalci izvozniki iz Tajvana (čeprav sta se le dva odločila, da sprejmeta preveritveni obisk),
one exporting producer in Thailand,
en proizvajalec izvoznik iz Tajske,
two suppliers in the Community,
dva dobavitelja v Skupnosti,
12 Community producers,
dvanajst proizvajalcev Skupnosti,
10 converters/users.
deset predelovalcev/uporabnikov.
It was also found that one non-cooperating Indonesian exporting producer had changed its name since the publication of the measures in force.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da je en nesodelujoči indonezijski proizvajalec izvoznik od objave veljavnih ukrepov spremenil svoje ime.
This concerned P.T.
To zadeva P.T.
Bakrie Kasei Corp. to P.T.
Bakrie Kasei Corp., pozneje P.T.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for its analysis and carried out verification visits at the premises of the following companies:
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so se ji zdele potrebne za analizo in opravila preveritvene obiske v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Exporting producers
Proizvajalci izvozniki
SENPET, formerly Elque Polyesters Ltd, Calcutta,
SENPET, prej Elque Polyesters Ltd., Calcutta,
Related exporter
Povezani izvoznik
Plastosen Ltd, Calcutta, (related to SENPET, formerly Elque Polyesters Ltd);
Plastosen Ltd., Calcutta, (povezan z družbo SENPET, prej Elque Polyesters Ltd.);
SK Chemicals Co. Ltd, Seoul,
SK Chemicals Co. Ltd., Seoul,
Huvis Corp., Seoul (related to SK Chemicals Co Ltd),
Huvis Corp., Seoul (povezan s SK Chemicals Co Ltd.),
Honam Petrochemicals Corp., Seoul (related to KP Chemicals Co Ltd);
Honam Petrochemicals Corp., Seoul (povezan s KP Chemicals Co Ltd);
Related traders/importers located in the Republic of Korea
Povezani trgovci/uvozniki v Republiki Koreji
SK Networks Ltd, Seoul (related to SK Chemicals Co Ltd),
SK Networks Ltd., Seoul (povezan s SK Chemicals Co Ltd.),
Lotte Trading Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea (related to KP Chemicals Co Ltd),
Lotte Trading Ltd., Seoul, Republika Koreja (povezan s KP Chemicals Co Ltd),
Lotte Daesan Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea (related to KP Chemicals Co Ltd);
Lotte Daesan Ltd., Seoul, Republika Koreja (povezan s KP Chemicals Co Ltd);
Related traders/importers located in the Community
Povezani trgovci/uvozniki v Skupnosti
SK Networks Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt/Main, Germany (related to SK Chemicals Co Ltd),
SK Networks Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt/Main, Nemčija (povezan s SK Chemicals Co Ltd.),
SK Eurochem, Warsaw, Poland (related to SK Chemicals Co Ltd);
SK Eurochem, Warsaw, Poljska (povezan s SK Chemicals Co Ltd.);
Bangkok Polyester Public company Ltd, Bangkok, Thailand;
Bangkok Polyester Public company Ltd, Bangkok, Tajska;
Voridian BV (The Netherlands),
Voridian BV (Nizozemska),
M & G Polimeri Italia Spa (Italy),
M & G Polimeri Italia Spa (Italija),
Equipolymers Srl (Italy),
Equipolymers Srl (Italija),
La Seda de Barcelona SA (Spain),
La Seda de Barcelona SA (Španija),
Novapet SA (Spain),
Novapet SA (Španija),
Selenis Industria de Polímeros SA (Portugal),
Selenis Industria de Polímeros SA (Portugalska),
Selenis Itália Spa (Italy);
Selenis Itália Spa (Italija);
Community Suppliers
Dobavitelj Skupnosti
Interquisa SA (Spain);
Interquisa SA (Španija);
Unrelated importers in the Community
Nepovezani uvoznik v Skupnosti
Global Service International SRL (Italy);
Global Service International SRL (Italija);
Community users
Uporabnik v Skupnosti
Coca Cola Enterprises Europe Ltd (Belgium).
Coca Cola Enterprises Europe Ltd (Belgija).
The investigation of the likelihood of continuation and/or recurrence of dumping and injury for the expiry review covered the period from 1 October 2004 to 30 September 2005 (RIP).
Preiskava verjetnosti nadaljevanja in/ali ponovitve dampinga in škode za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov je zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2004 do 30. septembra 2005 OPP.
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2002 up to the end of the RIP (period considered).
Preučitev gibanj, ki so pomembna za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajelo obdobje od 1. januarja 2002 do konca OPP („obravnavano obdobje“).
The investigation period for the partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation concerning imports from Taiwan and from three exporting producers in the Republic of Korea is the same as that of the expiry review.
Obdobje preiskave za delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe v zvezi z uvozom iz Tajvana in uvozom treh proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Republike Koreje je enako kot za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov.
The product concerned is the same as in the original investigation i.e. PET with a coefficient of viscosity of 78 ml/g or higher, according to the ISO Standard 1628-5 originating in the countries concerned.
Zadevni izdelek je enak kot v prvotni preiskavi, tj. PET s količnikom viskoznosti 78 ml/g ali več v skladu s standardom ISO 1628-5 s poreklom iz zadevnih držav.
It is currently classifiable within CN code 39076020.
Trenutno je uvrščen pod oznako KN 39076020.
As in the original investigation and the review investigation, it was found that the product concerned, PET produced and sold on the domestic markets in the countries concerned and PET produced and sold by the Community producers have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and uses.
Kot v prvotni preiskavi in preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom je bilo ugotovljeno, da imata zadevni izdelek, PET, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačih trgih v zadevnih državah, in PET, ki ga proizvajajo in prodajajo proizvajalci Skupnosti, enake osnovne fizikalne in kemične lastnosti in uporabo.
Therefore, these products are considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se šteje, da so ti izdelki v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe podobni izdelki.
Dumping of imports during the investigation period — General principles
Damping uvoza med obdobjem preiskave – splošna načela
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether dumping was currently taking place and whether or not the expiry of the measures would be likely to lead to a continuation of dumping.
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe je bilo preverjeno, ali damping trenutno obstaja in ali bi prenehanje ukrepov lahko privedlo do nadaljevanja dampinga ali ne.
The general methodology set out below has been applied to all exporting producers in the countries concerned and is the same as in the original investigation.
Spodaj navedena splošna metodologija je bila uporabljena pri vseh proizvajalcih izvoznikih v zadevnih državah in je enaka kot v prvotni preiskavi.
The presentation of the findings of dumping for each of the countries concerned therefore only describes what is specific for each exporting country.
Predstavitev ugotovitev dampinga za vsako zadevno državo zato samo opisuje, kar je značilno za vsako državo izvoznico.
For the determination of normal value, it was first established, for each exporting producer, whether its total domestic sales of the product concerned were representative in comparison with its total export sales to the Community.
Pri določanju normalne vrednosti je bilo najprej za vsakega proizvajalca izvoznika ugotovljeno, ali je skupna domača prodaja zadevnega izdelka reprezentativna v primerjavi s celotnim izvozom v Skupnost.
Subsequently, those types of the product concerned sold domestically by the exporting producers having overall representative domestic sales, and that were identical or directly comparable to the types sold for export to the Community, were identified.
Naknadno so bile opredeljene tiste vrste izdelka, ki so jih na domačem trgu prodali proizvajalci izvozniki, ki so imele skupno reprezentativno domačo prodajo in ki so bile enake ali neposredno primerljive z vrstami, prodanimi za izvoz v Skupnost.
For each type sold by the exporting producers on their domestic markets and found to be directly comparable with the types of PET sold for export to the Community, it was established whether domestic sales were sufficiently representative for the purposes of Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Za vsako vrsto, ki so jo proizvajalci izvozniki prodali na domačem trgu in za katero je bilo ugotovljeno, da je neposredno primerljiva z vrsto PET, ki je bila prodana za izvoz v Skupnost, je bilo ugotovljeno, ali je domača prodaja dovolj reprezentativna za namene člena 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
Domestic sales of a particular type of PET were considered sufficiently representative when the total domestic sales volume of that type during the RIP represented 5 % or more of the total sales volume of the comparable PET type exported to the Community.
Domača prodaja določene vrste PET se je štela za dovolj reprezentativno, če je celotni obseg domače prodaje te vrste v OPP predstavljal 5 % ali več celotnega obsega prodaje primerljive vrste PET, ki se je izvažala v Skupnost.
An examination was also made whether the domestic sales of each type of PET could be regarded as having been made in the ordinary course of trade, pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Preverjeno je bilo tudi, ali se lahko domača prodaja vsake vrste PET šteje za običajni potek trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
This was done by establishing for each exporting producer in the countries concerned, the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market, of each exported type of the product concerned on the domestic market during the investigation period.
To je bilo narejeno tako, da se je za vsakega proizvajalca izvoznika v zadevnih državah ugotovil delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu za vsako izvoženo vrsto zadevnega izdelka na domačem trgu med obdobjem preiskave.