natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This comparison indicated that the level of cooperation was low, since the exports by the cooperating producers represented less than 29 % of total Community imports from the PRC during the IP.
Ta primerjava je pokazala, da je bila stopnja sodelovanja nizka, ker je uvoz sodelujočih proizvajalcev predstavljal manj kot 29 % celotnega uvoza Skupnosti iz LRK v OP.
Therefore, the level of dumping for the export volumes of non-cooperating Chinese exporting producers was determined on the basis of the highest dumping margin established for the cooperating exporting producers for the normal carbon content SiMn.
Zato je bila stopnja dampinga za obseg izvoza nesodelujočih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov določena na podlagi najvišje stopnje dampinga, določene za sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike za SiMn z normalno vsebnostjo ogljika.
This approach was deemed appropriate since there were no indications that any non-cooperating producer was dumping at a lower level than the cooperating exporting producers.
Ta pristop se je štel za primernega, ker ni bilo dokazov, da je kateri koli nesodelujoči proizvajalec izvajal damping na nižji stopnji kot sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki.
Therefore, a countrywide average dumping margin was calculated using as a weighting factor the cif value of each group of exporters, i.e. cooperating exporters and non-cooperating exporters.
Zato je bila izračunana povprečna stopnja dampinga na ravni države, in sicer tako, da se je za vse skupine izvoznikov, tj. sodelujoče in nesodelujoče, kot faktor tehtanja uporabila vrednost CIF.
On this basis, the countrywide dumping margin, expressed as a percentage of the cif import price at the Community frontier, duty unpaid, is 60,1 %.
Na podlagi tega je stopnja dampinga na ravni države, izražena kot odstotek uvozne cene CIF meja Skupnosti, brez plačane dajatve, 60,1 %.
Based on the complaint, the information available from the exporting producer which came forward and other statistical data it appeared that OJSC Kazchrome is the sole Kazakh exporting producer of silico-manganese.
Na podlagi pritožbe, razpoložljivih informacij od proizvajalca izvoznika, ki jih je predložil, in drugih statističnih podatkov se je zdelo, da je OJSC Kazchrome edini kazahstanski proizvajalec izvoznik silicij-mangana.
As no indications were found that any exporting producer deliberately abstained from cooperating it was considered appropriate to set the residual dumping margin at the same level as the level established for OJSC Kazchrome.
Ker ni bilo nobenih dokazov o tem, da se je proizvajalec izvoznik namerno vzdržal sodelovanja, se je zdelo primerno, da se preostala stopnja dampinga določi na enaki stopnji, kot je bila določena za OJSC Kazchrome.
The dumping margins established, expressed as a percentage of the cif import price at the Community frontier, duty unpaid, are therefore the following:
Stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek uvozne cene CIF meja Skupnosti, brez plačane dajatve, torej znašajo:
All other companies: 6,5 %.
vse druge družbe: 6,5 %.
Based on the complaint, the information available from the exporting producers which came forward and other statistical data, it was concluded that the level of cooperation was above 80 % in the case of Ukraine.
Na podlagi pritožbe, razpoložljivih informacij od proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki so jih predložili, in drugih statističnih podatkov je bilo sklenjeno, da je bila stopnja sodelovanja v primeru Ukrajine nad 80 %.
Therefore, it was considered appropriate to set the residual dumping margin at the level of the highest dumping margin established for a cooperating exporting producer in the country concerned.
Zato se je zdelo primerno, da se preostala stopnja dampinga določi na ravni najvišje stopnje dampinga, določene za sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika v zadevni državi.
On this basis, the dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the cif import price at the Community frontier, duty unpaid, are the following:
Na podlagi tega so stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek uvozne cene CIF meja Skupnosti, brez plačane dajatve, naslednje:
All other companies: 56,7 %.
vse druge družbe: 56,7 %.
In 1998, anti-dumping measures were imposed on imports of SiMn originating in the PRC and in Ukraine (Regulation (EC) No 495/98 [3]).
Leta 1998 so bili uvedeni protidampinški ukrepi za uvoz SiMn s poreklom iz LRK in Ukrajine (Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 495/98 [3]).
Those measures expired in early March 2003.
Ti ukrepi so prenehali veljati v začetku marca 2003.
Therefore, during the early part of the period considered there were measures in place on imports from two of the countries concerned.
Tako so v začetku obravnavanega obdobja veljali ukrepi za uvoz iz dveh od zadevnih držav.
This fact was taken into consideration when conducting the injury analysis.
To dejstvo se je upoštevalo pri analizi škode.
As indicated in recital 118 below, the evolution in respect of profitability clearly indicates that the removal of the anti-dumping measures in March 2003 did not influence significantly the situation of the Community industry during the following period.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 118, sprememba v zvezi z dobičkonosnostjo jasno kaže, da odprava protidampinških ukrepov marca 2003 ni znatno vplivala na stanje industrije Skupnosti v naslednjem obdobju.
It is therefore concluded that, contrary to the claim by some interested parties, the year 2002 can be considered as the basis for the calculation of the indices mentioned in recitals 93 to 141.
Zato je sklenjeno, da se v nasprotju s trditvijo nekaterih zainteresiranih strank leto 2002 lahko uporabi kot osnovo za izračun kazalnikov iz uvodnih izjav 93 do 141.
SiMn is a key raw material used for the production of steel.
SiMn je glavna surovina za proizvodnjo jekla.
There was a significant increase in demand for steel worldwide, but primarily in Asia, which began towards the end of 2003 and continued during the first half of 2004.
Večje povpraševanje po jeklu v svetu, in zlasti v Aziji, se je začelo proti koncu leta 2003 in se nadaljevalo v prvi polovici leta 2004.
This, combined with production shortages of SiMn in Asia resulted in increased worldwide demand for SiMn, and led to an unprecedented increase in price during 2004.
To je skupaj s pomanjkanjem proizvodnje SiMn v Aziji povzročilo povečano svetovno povpraševanje po SiMn in vodilo k neprimerljivemu povišanju cen v letu 2004.
In carrying out the injury analysis, account has been taken of these unusual circumstances, in order to ensure that they do not unduly affect the injury picture.
Navedene neobičajne okoliščine so se pri analizi škode upoštevale, da ne bi izkrivile slike o škodi.
Within the Community, the like product is manufactured by five producers.
Podoben izdelek v Skupnosti proizvaja pet proizvajalcev.
Of these five producers, a total of four, being members of the complaining association, declared their interest in cooperating in the proceeding within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation and properly cooperated with the investigation.
Od teh petih proizvajalcev so skupaj štirje proizvajalci, ki so člani združenja pritožnika, izrazili interes za sodelovanje v postopku v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku, in ustrezno sodelovali pri preiskavi.
These four producers were found to account for a major proportion, in this case around 88 %, of the total Community production of the like product.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da ti štirje proizvajalci predstavljajo večji delež celotne proizvodnje podobnega izdelka v Skupnosti, v tem primeru približno 88 %.
The four cooperating producers therefore constitute the Community industry within the meaning of Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation and will be hereafter referred to as the ‘Community industry’.
Ti štirje sodelujoči proizvajalci zato predstavljajo industrijo Skupnosti v smislu členov 4(1) in 5(4) osnovne uredbe ter bodo v nadaljnjem besedilu imenovani „industrija Skupnosti“.
The remaining Community producer will be hereafter referred to as the ‘other Community producer’.
Preostali proizvajalec Skupnosti bo v nadaljevanju imenovan kot „drugi proizvajalec Skupnosti“.
This other Community producer did not oppose the complaint.
Ta drugi proizvajalec Skupnosti ni nasprotoval pritožbi.
Community consumption was established on the basis of the volumes of the Community industry's own production taking into account changes in stock levels, the import and export volumes data for the Community market obtained from Eurostat and, concerning the other Community producer, from estimations made by the Community industry producers.
Potrošnja Skupnosti je bila določena na podlagi obsega lastne proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti ob upoštevanju sprememb stanja zalog, namenjenih za trg Skupnosti, podatkov o obsegu uvoza in izvoza na trg Skupnosti, ki jih je zagotovil Eurostat, za drugega proizvajalca Skupnosti pa na podlagi ocen industrijskih proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
In the IP, the Community market for the product concerned and the like product was approximately 9 % higher than in 2002, i.e. around 914000 tonnes.
V OP je bil trg Skupnosti za zadevni izdelek in podoben izdelek približno 9 % višji kot v letu 2002, tj. približno 914000 ton.
During the period considered consumption increased to a peak in 2004, when it was 14 % higher than in2002, but fell in the following two years.
V obravnavanem obdobju se je potrošnja povečala na najvišjo raven v letu 2004, ko je bila 14 % višja kot v letu 2002, vendar je v naslednjih dveh letih upadla.
Total EC consumption (tonnes)
Celotna potrošnja ES (v tonah)
Index (2002=100)
Indeks (2002 = 100)
The dumping margin found for each of the countries concerned was more than de minimis, the volume of imports from each of these countries was not negligible and the cumulative assessment could be considered appropriate in view of the conditions of competition between the imports from the countries concerned and the like Community product.
Stopnja dampinga, ugotovljena za vsako od zadevnih držav, je bila več kot de minimis, obseg uvoza iz vsake od teh držav ni bil zanemarljiv in kumulativna ocena se je zdela primerna glede na konkurenčne pogoje med uvozom iz zadevnih držav in podobnim izdelkom Skupnosti.
These similar conditions of competition were evidenced by the fact that the product concerned imported from the countries concerned and the like product produced and sold by the Community industry within the Community market were alike and distributed via the same trade channels.
Dokaz za te podobne konkurenčne pogoje je bilo dejstvo, da sta si bila zadevni izdelek, uvožen iz zadevnih držav, in podobni izdelek, ki ga je proizvedla in prodala industrija Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti, podobna ter sta se prodajala in kupovala po istih prodajnih poteh.
Moreover, all import volumes were substantial and resulted in significant market shares.
Poleg tega je bil celoten obseg uvoza znaten, zato je bil tak tudi njegov tržni delež.
However, in view of the absence of undercutting by imports from Ukraine as stated at recital 104, it is considered that the effect of imports from Ukraine should be assessed separately.
Vendar je bilo glede na odsotnost nelojalnega nižanja cen uvoza iz Ukrajine, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 104, sklenjeno, da bi bilo treba vpliv uvoza iz Ukrajine oceniti ločeno.
The exporting producer in Kazakhstan maintained that Kazakhstan should not be cumulated with the PRC for the purpose of the injury assessment, because of its diametrically different market behaviour.
Proizvajalec izvoznik iz Kazahstana je trdil, da se Kazahstana pri oceni škode ne bi smelo združiti z LRK zaradi njunega popolnoma nasprotnega tržnega vedenja.
This exporting producer argued inter alia that the evolution of Kazakh import volumes, values and market share for the Community was different from the other countries concerned and that there was a difference in product mix.
Ta proizvajalec izvoznik je med drugim trdil, da se je gibanje obsega kazahstanskega uvoza, vrednosti in tržnega deleža za Skupnost razlikovalo od drugih zadevnih držav in da je obstajala razlika v ponudbi izdelkov.
In respect of this, it is acknowledged that there was during the period considered an overall decrease in the volume of imports and in market share in respect of Kazakhstan (the latter was 5,8 % in 2002 and 4,6 % during the IP).
V zvezi s tem je bilo priznano, da sta se obseg uvoza in tržni delež Kazahstana (slednji je bil 5,8 % leta 2002 in 4,6 % v OP) v obravnavanem obdobju na splošno zmanjšala.
However, both the volume and market share of Kazakh imports during the period considered were relatively stable and were at levels which cannot be considered as insignificant.
Vendar sta bila obseg in tržni delež kazahstanskega uvoza med zadevnim obdobjem relativno stabilna in na stopnjah, ki jih ni mogoče obravnavati kot zanemarljive.
In addition, the investigation has shown that the evolution of prices for Kazakh imports is not significantly different from that for imports from the other countries concerned.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da gibanje cen kazahstanskega uvoza ni bilo bistveno drugačno od cen uvoza iz drugih zadevnih držav.
Therefore, also in light of the considerations in recitals 73 to 75 it cannot be concluded that there is a diametrically different market behaviour between imports from the PRC and Kazakhstan and consequently the claim should be rejected.
Zato tudi glede na ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 73 do 75 ni mogoče sklepati o popolnoma nasprotnem tržnem vedenju uvoza iz LRK in Kazahstana, zato je treba zahtevek zavrniti.
In the light of the above, it was considered that all the criteria set out in Article 3(4) of the basic Regulation were met in respect of the PRC and Kazakhstan.
V smislu zgoraj navedenega se je štelo, da so bila v zvezi z LRK in Kazahstanom izpolnjena vsa merila iz člena 3(4) osnovne uredbe.
The imports from those two countries concerned were therefore examined cumulatively, while imports from Ukraine were assessed separately.
Zato je bil uvoz iz teh dveh zadevnih držav proučen kumulativno, uvoz iz Ukrajine pa ločeno.
The volume of imports of the product concerned from the PRC and Kazakhstan into the Community increased steadily from around 48000 tonnes during 2002 to around 162000 tonnes during 2004, before decreasing to around 96000 tonnes during the IP.
Obseg uvoza zadevnega izdelka iz LRK in Kazahstana v Skupnost se je neprekinjeno povečeval, s približno 48000 ton v letu 2002 na približno 162000 ton v letu 2004, preden se je v OP zmanjšal na približno 96000 ton.
Between 2002 and the IP, the volume of imports from these countries increased by 99 %.
Med letom 2002 in OP se je obseg uvoza iz teh držav povečal za 99 %.
Volume of imports from the PRC and Kazakhstan (tonnes)
Obseg uvoza iz LRK in Kazahstana (v tonah)
Market share of imports from the PRC and Kazakhstan
Tržni delež uvoza iz LRK in Kazahstana
Price of imports from the PRC and Kazakhstan (EUR/tonne)
Cena uvoza iz LRK in Kazahstana (EUR/tono)
The volume of imports of the product concerned from Ukraine into the Community decreased slightly from around 154000 tonnes during 2002 to around 138000 tonnes during 2003 and 2004, before increasing to around 180000 tonnes during 2005 and to around 210000 tonnes during the IP.
Obseg uvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Ukrajine v Skupnost se je rahlo zmanjšal s približno 154000 ton v letu 2002 na približno 138000 ton med letoma 2003 in 2004, preden se je povečal na približno 180000 ton v letu 2005 in na približno 210000 ton v OP.
Between 2002 and the IP, the volume of imports from these countries increased by 36 %.
Med letom 2002 in OP se je obseg uvoza iz teh držav povečal za 36 %.
Price of imports from Ukraine (EUR/tonne)
Cena uvoza iz Ukrajine (EUR/tono)
The market share held by imports from the PRC and Kazakhstan stood at 5,8 % during 2002.
Tržni delež uvoza iz LRK in Kazahstana je v letu 2002 znašal 5,8 %.
This increased in 2003 and again in 2004, reaching 17,0 % in that year.
Povečal se je v letu 2003 in ponovno v letu 2004, ko je dosegel 17,0 %.
During 2005 the market share decreased slightly to 15,5 % and decreased again during the IP to 10,4 %.
V letu 2005 se je tržni delež rahlo zmanjšal na 15,5 % in se v OP ponovno zmanjšal do 10,4 %.
Overall, between 2002 and the IP, the market share increased by 4,6 percentage points to almost double the market share in 2002.
Skupno se je tržni delež med letom 2002 in OP povečal za 4,6 odstotne točke in se od leta 2002 skoraj podvojil.
The market share held by imports from Ukraine stood at 18,5 % during 2002.
Tržni delež uvoza iz Ukrajine je leta 2002 znašal 18,5 %.
This decreased in 2003 and again in 2004, reaching 14,4 % in that year.
Zmanjšal se je v letu 2003 in ponovno v letu 2004, ko je dosegel 14,4 %.
During 2005 the market share increased to 19,5 % and increased again during the IP to 23,0 %.
V letu 2005 se je tržni delež povečal na 19,5 %, povečanje v OP pa znaša 23,0 %.
Overall, between 2002 and the IP, the market share increased by 4,5 percentage points.
Skupno se je tržni delež med letom 2002 in OP povečal za 4,5 odstotne točke.
Price evolution
Gibanje cen
During 2004, prices for the SiMn increased worldwide to exceptional levels due to a situation of unusually high demand and low supply, as explained in recital 89.
V letu 2004 so se cene za SiMn v svetu povišale do izjemnih ravni zaradi neobičajno velikega povpraševanja in nizke stopnje ponudbe, kakor je razloženo v uvodni izjavi 89.
This is reflected in the prices of imports from the countries concerned for that year and part of 2005.
To se odraža v cenah uvoza iz zadevnih držav za navedeno leto in del leta 2005.
This, however, did not affect prices during the IP.
Vendar to ni vplivalo na cene v OP.
Overall, the average price of imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC and Kazakhstan increased by 22 % between 2002 and the IP, while the average price of imports of the product concerned originating in Ukraine increased by 8 % over the same period.
Povprečna cena uvoza zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK in Kazahstana se je med letom 2002 in OP v celoti povišala za 22 %, medtem ko se je povprečna cena uvoza zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Ukrajine v enakem obdobju povišala za 8 %.
A model-to-model price comparison was made between the exporting producer and the Community industry's average selling prices in the Community.
Za določitev nelojalnega nižanja cen posameznih modelov je bila narejena primerjava med povprečnimi prodajnimi cenami v Skupnosti proizvajalcev izvoznikov in industrije Skupnosti.
To this end, Community industry's prices to unrelated customers have been compared with the prices of cooperating exporting producers of the countries concerned.
V ta namen so se cene industrije Skupnosti, zaračunane nepovezanim strankam, primerjale s cenami sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov zadevnih držav.
Adjustments were applied where necessary to take account of differences in the level of trade and in the quality of products.
Kjer je bilo to potrebno, so bile izvedene prilagoditve zaradi upoštevanja razlik v stopnji trgovine in kakovosti izdelkov.
The comparison showed that during the IP, SiMn originating in the PRC and Kazakhstan sold in the Community each undercut the Community industry's prices by 4,5 %, and consequently by 4,5 % overall on a weighted average basis.
Primerjava je pokazala, da je SiMn s poreklom iz LRK in Kazahstana, prodan v Skupnosti, v OP nelojalno znižal cene industrije Skupnosti za 4,5 % in posledično skupno za 4,5 % na podlagi tehtanega povprečja.
Prices of imports from Ukraine were at comparable levels to those of the Community industry (i.e. no undercutting).
Cene uvoza iz Ukrajine so bile na primerljivi ravni s cenami industrije Skupnosti (tj. brez nelojalnega nižanja).
With a view to ensure that in the undercutting calculation prices are compared at the same level of trade, ex-works prices of the Community industry were compared with prices of the imported goods as they enter the physical territory of the Community, duly adjusted for the unloading and customs clearance costs.
Da bi se pri izračunu nelojalnega nižanja cen uporabila primerjava na enaki stopnji trgovine, so se cene franko tovarna industrije Skupnosti primerjale s cenami uvoženega blaga ob vstopu na fizično ozemlje Skupnosti, ustrezno prilagojene za stroške raztovarjanja in carinjenja.
One interested party contested the methodology used with regard to the Kazakh company, claiming that the basis for calculation of the price of imports should be the cif price at the point of customs clearance at the EU ports, and not the price of the imported goods as they enter the physical territory of the Community (in this case the land border in Lithuania).
Ena zainteresirana stranka je nasprotovala metodologiji, ki se je uporabila v zvezi s kazahstansko družbo, pri čemer je trdila, da bi morala biti osnova za izračun uvozne cene cena CIF na mestu carinjenja v pristaniščih EU in ne cena uvoženega blaga ob vstopu na fizično ozemlje Skupnosti (v tem primeru kopenska meja v Litvi).
No convincing argument was presented that would support the need to apply a different method of calculation for this company.
Predložen ni bil noben prepričljiv argument, ki bi podprl zahtevo po uporabi drugačne metode izračuna za to družbo.
On the contrary, it should be noted that the cif prices at the point of customs clearance of the Kazakh imports include a significant amount of transportation costs after the goods have passed the Community border in Lithuania and comparing them with the ex-works prices of the Community industry would be discriminatory for the latter, as the ex-work prices do not include any transportation cost.
Nasprotno, treba je opozoriti, da cene CIF na mestu carinjenja kazahstanskega uvoza vključujejo znaten delež prevoznih stroškov po tem, ko je blago prečkalo mejo Skupnosti v Litvi, primerjava teh s cenami franko tovarna industrije Skupnosti pa bi bila za slednje diskriminatorna, ker cene franko tovarna ne vključujejo prevoznih stroškov.
Therefore, it is concluded that the methodology applied is the most appropriate and consequently the claim is rejected.
Zato je sklenjeno, da je uporabljena metodologija najustreznejša in zahteva se zavrne.
Pursuant to Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined all relevant economic factors and indices having a bearing on the state of the Community industry.
V skladu s členom 3(5) osnovne uredbe je Komisija proučila vse pomembne gospodarske dejavnike in kazalnike, ki so vplivali na stanje industrije Skupnosti.
From a level of around 241000 tonnes in 2002, the Community industry's production increased to a peak during 2004 of around 255000 tonnes, due to exceptional demand as explained in recital 89, before decreasing in 2005 and increasing slightly in the IP.
Proizvodnja industrije Skupnosti se je z ravni približno 241000 ton leta 2002 dvignila na najvišjo raven približno 255000 ton leta 2004 zaradi izjemnega povpraševanja, kakor je razloženo v uvodni izjavi 89, nato je leta 2005 upadla in se v OP ponovno rahlo povečala.
Overall, production decreased over the period considered by 6 % to around 226000 tonnes during the IP.
Proizvodnja se je v obravnavanem obdobju skupno zmanjšala za 6 % in v OP znašala približno 226000 ton.
It should be noted that one Community producer stopped production of SiMn during 2003 and for much of the IP.
Treba je opozoriti, da je en proizvajalec Skupnosti v letu 2003 in v večjem delu OP proizvodnjo SiMn zaustavil.
The production capacity of the Community industry remained stable, at a level of around 325000 tonnes, throughout the period considered.
Proizvodna zmogljivost industrije Skupnosti je ostala stabilna na ravni približno 325000 ton v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju.
Capacity utilisation was 74 % in 2002.
Izkoriščenost zmogljivosti je leta 2002 znašala 74 %.
It declined to 68 % in 2003, increased again to 79 % in 2004, before declining to 69 % in the IP.
Leta 2003 je upadla na 68 %, leta 2004 se je ponovno povečala na 79 %, preden je v OP upadla na 69 %.
This reflects the variations in production volumes as described in recital 107.
To odraža razlike v obsegu proizvodnje, kakor je opisano v uvodni izjavi 107.