natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Market economy treatment (MET) and individual treatment (IT)
Tržnogospodarska obravnava („TGO“) in individualna obravnava („IO“)
Following the provisional disclosure, one group of exporting producers whose request for MET or IT was rejected on the grounds that it had provided misleading information within the meaning of Article 18 of the basic Regulation, argued that it should not be treated as non-cooperating and that the omission of certain information which was considered by the Commission in its provisional findings as misleading should not lead to the rejection of IT, since the information concerned only the domestic market, and would thus affect the calculation of the normal value.
Po začasnem razkritju je skupina proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki jim je bila zaradi predložitve zavajajočih informacij v smislu člena 18 osnovne uredbe zavrnjena TGO ali IO, ugovarjala, da se smejo obravnavati kot nesodelujoče in da se jim zaradi izpustitve nekaterih informacij, kar je Komisija v začasnih ugotovitvah štela za zavajajoče, ne bi smela zavrniti IO, saj so informacije zadevale le domači trg in bi tako vplivale na izračun normalne vrednosti.
However, the company failed to give any satisfactory explanation as to the information which had been omitted, and it is therefore considered appropriate to maintain the provisional findings concerning their level of cooperation.
Vendar družba glede izpustitve informacij ni uspela dati zadovoljivega pojasnila, zato je bilo sklenjeno, da je začasne ugotovitve glede ravni sodelovanja primerno ohraniti.
The consequent doubts on the reliability of the whole information submitted by this exporting producer still exist, and in the absence of full cooperation of all related companies within one group of exporting producers, it cannot be determined whether the criteria set out in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation concerning IT are met in relation to this group.
Še vedno obstajajo dvomi o zanesljivosti vseh informacij, ki jih je predložil navedeni proizvajalec izvoznik, in glede na to, da vse povezane družbe znotraj ene skupine proizvajalcev izvoznikov niso v celoti sodelovale, ni mogoče ugotoviti, ali so v zvezi s to skupino merila iz člena 9(5) osnovne uredbe glede IO izpolnjena.
The Community industry claimed that the fact that some of the exporting producers benefited from tax exemptions aimed at encouraging foreign direct investment is incompatible with the granting of MET to these exporting producers.
Industrija Skupnosti je trdila, da je dejstvo, da so nekateri proizvajalci izvozniki oproščeni davka zaradi spodbujanja tujih neposrednih naložb, nezdružljivo z odobritvijo TGO tem proizvajalcem izvoznikom.
However, the actual benefits from these tax exemptions to the companies were found to be negligible, and it is therefore considered that they were not incompatible with MET.
Vendar je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile dejanske koristi teh družb zaradi oprostitve davka zanemarljive, zato se ta ne šteje za nezdružljivo s TGO.
The Community industry also argued that MET should have been denied to one of the groups of exporters, due to the fact that during the IP there were provisions in the Articles of Association of those exporters, specifying a certain percentage of export sales.
Industrija Skupnosti je tudi zahtevala, da bi bilo treba eni od skupin izvoznikov zavrniti TGO, ker so bile med OP v statutih združenja teh izvoznikov določbe, s katerimi je bil opredeljen določen odstotek izvozne prodaje.
However, it is considered that these provisions, which were not in practice followed by the exporters and have been removed after the IP, did not constitute either de jure or de facto restrictions on these companies' activities.
Vendar navedene določbe, ki jih izvozniki v praksi niso izvajali in so bile po OP umaknjene, dejavnosti teh družb niso omejevale niti formalne niti dejansko.
In the absence of any new arguments regarding the granting of MET and IT, the findings as set out in recitals 19 to 27 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih novih argumentov v zvezi z odobritvijo TGO in IO, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 19 do 27 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Determination of normal value for the exporting producers in the PRC granted MET
Določitev normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK, ki jim je bila odobrena TGO
Following the provisional disclosure, one exporting producer submitted comments concerning the detailed calculations made for establishing the normal value.
Po začasnem razkritju je en proizvajalec izvoznik predložil pripombe glede podrobnega izračuna za določitev normalne vrednosti.
These comments were found to be justified, and the calculations of the normal value were corrected accordingly.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so pripombe utemeljene, in izračun normalne vrednosti je bil ustrezno popravljen.
In the absence of any other comments regarding the calculation of normal value, the general methodology as set out in recitals 28 to 40 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker glede izračuna normalne vrednosti ni bilo drugih pripomb, se potrdi splošna metodologija iz uvodnih izjav 28 do 40 začasne uredbe.
Following the provisional disclosure, one importer reiterated a statement already made earlier in the procedure by another party, claiming that the only cooperating producer in Brazil enjoyed a dominant position in the Brazilian market and was furthermore related to the complainant, and contested the Commission's choice of Brazil as analogue country.
Po začasnem razkritju je en uvoznik ponovil izjavo neke druge stranke iz zgodnejše faze postopka in trdil, da ima edini sodelujoči brazilski proizvajalec prevladujoči položaj na brazilskem trgu in da je poleg tega povezan s pritožnikom, ter izpodbijal odločitev Komisije, da je za primerljivo državo izbrala Brazilijo.
These arguments were already analysed by the Commission and refuted in recital 47 of the provisional Regulation.
Komisija je te zahteve že analizirala in zavrnila v uvodni izjavi 47 začasne uredbe.
As no new information was provided in the comments received after the provisional disclosure and there was no indication in the further investigation that the position of the cooperating Brazilian producer on the Brazilian market or its relationship to the complainant may have affected the reliability of the data submitted or the appropriateness of Brazil as analogue country, the conclusion made at provisional stage is confirmed.
Ker v pripombah, prejetih po začasnem razkritju, ni bilo novih informacij in nadaljnja preiskava ni pokazala, da bi položaj sodelujočega brazilskega proizvajalca na brazilskem trgu ali njegovo razmerje s pritožnikom lahko vplivalo na zanesljivost predloženih podatkov ali primernost Brazilije za primerljivo državo, se potrdi sklep iz začasne faze.
In the absence of any other comments regarding the use of Brazil as an analogue country, recitals 41 to 49 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb glede uporabe Brazilije kot primerljive države, se uvodne izjave 41 do 49 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The verification of the data submitted by the cooperating producer in Brazil took place before the imposition of provisional measures, but too late in the proceedings for its results to be reflected in those measures.
Preverjanje podatkov, ki jih je predložil sodelujoči proizvajalec v Braziliji, je bilo opravljeno pred uvedbo začasnih ukrepov, vendar prepozno v postopku, da bi se rezultati lahko upoštevali pri teh ukrepih.
In view of the results of that verification, the calculation of the normal value for the exporting producers in the PRC not granted MET was refined.
Glede na rezultate preverjanja je bil izračun normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK, ki jim TGO ni bila odobrena, popravljen.
In the absence of any comments with regard to the determination of the normal value for the exporting producers not granted MET, the general methodology as set out in recitals 41 to 51 of the provisional Regulation is definitively confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb glede določitve normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim ni bila odobrena TGO, se dokončno potrdi splošna metodologija, določena v uvodnih izjavah 41 do 51 začasne uredbe.
In the absence of any comments with regard to export prices, the general methodology as set out in recitals 52 to 54 of the provisional Regulation, is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb glede izvoznih cen, se potrdi splošna metodologija iz uvodnih izjav 52 do 54 začasne uredbe.
Following the provisional disclosure, one exporting producer claimed that an adjustment for differences in commissions, according to Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation, made on the export price for sales made through a related company in Taiwan, was not warranted.
Po začasnem razkritju je en proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da prilagoditev zaradi razlik v provizijah, v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) osnovne uredbe, narejena na izvozne cene za prodajo preko povezane družbe v Tajvanu, ni bila utemeljena.
The exporter claimed that the Taiwanese company does not perform any of the functions referred to in Article 2(10)(i).
Izvoznik je trdil, da tajvanska družba ne izvaja nobene dejavnosti iz člena 2(10)(i).
However, this claim is in contradiction with the description of the sales process given in the company's reply to the anti-dumping questionnaire and as verified during the on-the-spot investigation, and therefore this claim cannot be accepted.
Ta trditev pa je v nasprotju z opisom prodajnega postopka, navedenega v odgovoru družbe na protidampinški vprašalnik in preverjenega s preiskavo na kraju samem, zato se trditev ne more sprejeti.
In the absence of any other comments in this respect, recitals 55 and 56 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s tem ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodni izjavi 55 in 56 začasne uredbe potrdita.
One cooperating exporting producer claimed that an individual dumping margin should also be attributed to one company in the group who had not exported to the EC during the IP.
En sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da bi bilo treba individualno stopnjo dampinga dodeliti tudi eni od družb v skupini, ki med OP ni izvažala v ES.
Given that the group has fully cooperated in the investigation, their claim was accepted and the group's average dumping margin should also be attributed to this company, Cionlli Bicycle Components (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. In the light of the above mentioned revisions relating to normal value, the definitive dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the cif Community frontier price, duty unpaid, are as follows:
Glede na to, da je družba v preiskavi v celoti sodelovala, je bila zahteva sprejeta in povprečno stopnjo dampinga na ravni skupine bi bilo treba dodeliti tudi družbi Cionlli Bicycle Components (Tianjin) Co. Ltd. Na podlagi zgoraj navedenih popravkov v zvezi z normalno vrednostjo so dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, naslednje:
Cionlli Bicycle (Taicang) Co., Ltd, Shunde Hongli Bicycle Parts Co., Ltd, Safe Strong Bicycle Parts Shenzhen Co., Ltd and Cionlli Bicycle Components (Tianjin) Co., Ltd
Cionlli Bicycle (Taicang) Co. Ltd., Shunde Hongli Bicycle Parts Co. Ltd., Safe Strong Bicycle Parts Shenzhen Co. Ltd. in Cionlli Bicycle Components (Tianjin) Co. Ltd.
Giching Bicycle Parts (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd and Velo Cycle Kunshan Co., Ltd
Giching Bicycle Parts (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. in Velo Cycle Kunshan Co. Ltd.
Following the provisional disclosure, one importer claimed that the countrywide dumping margin should not have been based on the single cooperating exporting producer to which neither MET nor IT was granted.
Po začasnem razkritju je en uvoznik trdil, da stopnja dampinga na ravni države ne bi smela temeljiti na podatkih edinega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika, ki mu nista bili odobreni niti TGO niti IO.
According to this importer, the countrywide dumping margin should also have been based on the export price of the group of exporting producers mentioned in recital 9.
Po mnenju tega uvoznika bi morala stopnja dampinga na ravni države temeljiti tudi na izvozni ceni skupine proizvajalcev izvoznikov, navedene v uvodni izjavi 9.
However, as stated in recital 23 of the provisional Regulation, there are serious doubts on the integrity of the whole data provided by that exporter which had deliberately omitted to declare its relationship with one of its main domestic customers and was thus considered as non-cooperating in this investigation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 23 začasne uredbe, pa obstajajo resni dvomi o resničnosti celotnih podatkov navedenega izvoznika, ki namenoma ni navedel svojega razmerja z enim od svojih glavnih domačih strank in se je zato štel za nesodelujočega v tej raziskavi.
the dumping margin found for the cooperating exporter to which neither MET nor IT was granted and
ugotovljene stopnje dampinga za sodelujočega izvoznika, ki mu nista bili odobreni niti TGO niti IO,
The Community industry claimed that the average weight of 500 grams per saddle used by the Commission in the calculation of the countrywide duty was an over-estimation.
Industrija Skupnosti je trdila, da je povprečna teža 500 gramov na sedež, ki jo je Komisija uporabila pri izračunu stopnje dampinga na ravni države, previsoka.
The industry argued that an average weight of 420 grams should have been used instead, which would have implied a lower average price per saddle on the basis of Eurostat data.
Po njenem mnenju bi morala Komisija uporabiti 420 gramov, kar bi na podlagi podatkov Eurostata pomenilo nižjo povprečno ceno na sedež.
However, the industry was not able to support this claim with enough verifiable evidence.
Vendar industrija te zahteve ni mogla podpreti z zadostnimi preverljivimi dokazi.
Therefore, the estimate of an average weight of 500 grams, which is supported by the data gathered during the investigation, was maintained.
Zato se je ohranila ocenjena povprečna teža 500 gramov, ki je utemeljena s podatki, zbranimi med preiskavo.
On this basis, the definitive countrywide level of dumping is established at 29,6 % of the cif Community frontier price, duty unpaid.
Na podlagi tega se dokončna stopnja dampinga na ravni države določi v višini 29,6 % cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve.
In the absence of comments concerning Community production, recitals 64 and 65 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s proizvodnjo Skupnosti ni bilo pripomb, se uvodni izjavi 64 in 65 začasne uredbe potrdita.
In the absence of comments concerning the definition of the Community industry, recitals 66 and 67 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z opredelitvijo industrije Skupnosti ni bilo pripomb, se uvodni izjavi 66 in 67 začasne uredbe potrdita.
In the absence of comments concerning the Community consumption, recitals 68 and 69 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s potrošnjo Skupnosti ni bilo pripomb, se uvodni izjavi 68 in 69 začasne uredbe potrdita.
In the absence of any comments concerning the imports from the country concerned, recitals 70 to 76 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z uvozom iz zadevne države bilo nobenih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 70 do 76 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of comments concerning the situation of the Community industry, recitals 77 to 100 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s položajem industrije Skupnosti ni bilo pripomb, se uvodne izjave 77 do 100 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any new and substantiated information or argument in this respect, recitals 105 to 118 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s tem ni bilo predloženih novih in bistvenih informacij ali utemeljitev, se uvodne izjave 105 do 118 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of substantially new information or argument in this particular respect, recitals 119 to 135 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s tem ni bilo predloženih bistveno novih informacij ali utemeljitev, se uvodne izjave 119 do 135 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the injury elimination level, recitals 136 to 140 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb v zvezi s stopnjo odprave škode, se uvodne izjave 136 do 140 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the light of the foregoing and in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed at the level sufficient to eliminate the injury caused by the imports without exceeding the dumping margin found.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno in v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe je treba uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na stopnji, ki omogoča odpravo škode, ki jo je povzročil uvoz, ne da bi se presegla ugotovljena stopnja dampinga.
These duty rates (as opposed to the countrywide duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of products originating in the country concerned and produced by the companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Te stopnje dajatve (v nasprotju z dajatvijo za celotno državo, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“) se tako uporabljajo izključno za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz zadevne države, ki jih proizvajajo družbe, tj. posamezne navedene pravne osebe.
If appropriate, the Regulation will then be amended accordingly by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual duty rates.
Ta uredba bo po potrebi ustrezno spremenjena s posodobitvijo seznama družb, upravičenih do individualnih stopenj dajatve.
In order to ensure a proper enforcement of the anti-dumping duty, the residual duty level should not only apply to the non-cooperating exporters, but also to those companies which did not have any exports during the IP.
Za zagotavljanje pravilnega uveljavljanja protidampinške dajatve bi morala stopnja preostale dajatve veljati ne le za nesodelujoče izvoznike, ampak tudi za družbe, ki med OP niso izvažale.
However, the latter companies are invited, when they fulfil the requirements of Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation, second paragraph, to present a request for a review pursuant to that Article in order to have their situation examined individually.
Slednje so pozvane, da potem, ko izpolnijo zahteve iz drugega odstavka člena 11(4) osnovne uredbe, predložijo zahtevek za pregled v skladu z navedenim členom, da bi se njihovo stanje individualno preučilo.
In view of the magnitude of the dumping margins found and in the light of the level of the injury caused to the Community industry, it is considered necessary that the amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty, imposed by the provisional Regulation, i.e. Regulation (EC) No 1999/2006, should be definitively collected to the extent of the amount of the definitive duties imposed.
Glede na višino ugotovljenih stopenj dampinga in glede na stopnjo škode, povzročene industriji Skupnosti, se šteje, da je treba zneske, zavarovane z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo, uvedeno z začasno uredbo, tj. Uredbo (ES) št. 1999/2006, dokončno pobrati v višini zneska dokončno uvedenih dajatev.
Where the definitive duties are higher than the provisional duties, only the amounts secured at the level of the provisional duties shall be definitely collected.
Kjer so dokončne dajatve višje od začasnih, se dokončno poberejo samo zneski, zavarovani na stopnji začasnih dajatev.
In order to minimise the risks of circumvention due to the high difference in the duty rates, it is considered that special measures are needed in this case to ensure the proper application of the anti-dumping duties.
Za zmanjšanje tveganja izogibanja ukrepom zaradi prevelikih razlik v stopnjah dajatve se šteje, da so v tem primeru potrebni posebni ukrepi za zagotovitev ustrezne uporabe protidampinških dajatev.
These special measures, which only apply to companies for which an individual duty rate is introduced, include the presentation to the customs authorities of the Member States of a valid commercial invoice, which shall conform to the requirements set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Ti posebni ukrepi, ki veljajo samo za družbe, za katere je uvedena individualna dajatev, vključujejo predložitev veljavne trgovske fakture carinskim organom držav članic, ki je skladna z zahtevami, navedenimi v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
It is recalled that should the exports by the companies benefiting from lower individual duty rates increase significantly in volume after the imposition of the anti-dumping measures, such an increase in volume could be considered as constituting in itself a change in the pattern of trade due to the imposition of measures within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation.
Če se bo po uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov znatno povečal obseg izvoza družb, za katere veljajo nižje individualne stopnje dajatve, se bo takšno povečanje obsega obravnavalo kot sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja, nastala zaradi uvedbe ukrepov v smislu člena 13(1) osnovne uredbe.
This investigation may, inter alia, examine the need for the removal of individual duty rates and the consequent imposition of a countrywide duty,
S to preiskavo se lahko med drugim prouči potreba po odpravi individualnih stopenj dajatve in posledični uvedbi dajatve na ravni države –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of saddles and essential parts thereof i.e., bases, cushions and covers, of bicycles and other cycles (including delivery tricycles), not motorised, of cycles fitted with an auxiliary motor with or without sidecars, of fitness machines and of home trainers, falling within CN codes 87149500, ex87149990 and ex95069110 (TARIC codes 8714999081 and 9506911010) and originating in the People's Republic of China.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz sedežev in njihovih bistvenih sestavnih delov, tj. ogrodja, blazine in prevleke, dvokoles in drugih koles (vključno z dostavnimi tricikli) brez motornega pogona, koles s pomožnim motorjem, z bočno prikolico ali brez, ter naprav za fitnes in telovadnih naprav za domačo rabo, uvrščenih pod oznake KN 87149500, ex87149990 in ex95069110 (oznake TARIC 8714999081 in 9506911010), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
Amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duties pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1999/2006 on imports of saddles and essential parts thereof i.e., bases, cushions and covers, of bicycles and other cycles (including delivery tricycles), not motorised, of cycles fitted with an auxiliary motor with or without sidecars, of fitness machines and of home trainers, falling within CN codes 87149500, ex87149990 and ex95069110 (TARIC codes 8714999081 and 9506911010) and originating in the People's Republic of China shall be definitively collected.
Zneski, zavarovani z začasnimi protidampinškimi dajatvami v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1999/2006 na uvoz sedežev in njihovih bistvenih sestavnih delov, tj. ogrodja, blazine in prevleke, dvokoles in drugih koles (vključno z dostavnimi tricikli) brez motornega pogona, koles s pomožnim motorjem, z bočno prikolico ali brez, ter naprav za fitnes in telovadnih naprav za domačo rabo, uvrščenih pod oznake KN 87149500, ex87149990 in ex95069110 (oznake TARIC 8714999081 in 9506911010), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, se dokončno poberejo.
OJ L 379, 28.12.2006, p. 11.
UL L 379, 28.12.2006, str. 11.
European CommissionDirectorate-General for TradeDirection H, office J-79 5/16B-1049 Brussels.
Evropska komisijaGeneralni direktorat za trgovinoDirekcija H, pisarna J-79 5/161049 Bruselj/Belgija
The following declaration ‘I, the undersigned, certify that the [volume] of saddles and essential parts thereof sold for export to the European Community covered by this invoice was manufactured by (company name and address) (TARIC additional code) in (country concerned).
„Podpisani potrjujem, da je [količina] sedežev in njihovih bistvenih sestavnih delov, prodanih za izvoz v Evropsko skupnost, ki jih zajema ta trgovinska faktura, proizvedla (ime in naslov družbe) (dodatna oznaka TARIC) v (zadevna država).