natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the view of the above the Commission can conclude that all potential users of the infrastructure have access to it in an equal and non-discriminatory manner.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega lahko Komisija sklene, da imajo vsi potencialni uporabniki infrastrukture enakopraven in nediskriminatoren dostop do nje.
the development of trade is not affected to an extent contrary to the Community interest
Vpliv na razvoj trgovine ni tolikšen, da je to v nasprotju z interesom Skupnosti
The Commission firstly notes that the new southern runway while it optimises capacity at the airport is no more than a replacement for a pre-existing runway which was not optimally positioned.
Komisija najprej ugotavlja, da je nova južna vzletno-pristajalna steza, čeprav optimizira zmogljivost letališča, samo nadomestek za že obstoječo vzletno-pristajalno stezo, katere smer ni bila optimalna.
As previously referred to, the main cargo airports in Germany with which Leipzig-Halle competes are facing capacity or night flight restrictions and therefore future competition is unlikely.
Kot je že bilo omenjeno, se glavna letališča za tovorni promet v Nemčiji, katerim konkurira letališče Leipzig/Halle, soočajo z omejitvami zmogljivosti ali nočnih letov, zato je konkurenca v prihodnosti malo verjetna.
There is therefore little or no risk of distortion of competition with these airports.
Zato ta letališča predstavljajo le nizko tveganje za izkrivljanje konkurence ali ga sploh ne predstavljajo.
As previously indicated, when DHL was canvassing for possible European hubs it settled on a short-list of Leipzig/Halle, Vatry and Brussels.
Kot je bilo navedeno, je družba DHL pri odločanju glede možnih evropskih vozlišč v ožji izbor uvrstila letališča Leipzig, Vatry in Bruselj.
In this regard the Commission notes that neither Brussels nor Vatry has commented during the opening of procedure.
V zvezi s tem Komisija ugotavlja, da na začetku postopka Bruselj in Vatry nista predložila pripomb.
The Commission also notes that no other European airport has indicated during the opening of procedure that the development of Leipzig/Halle airport as set out above gives them cause for concern.
Komisija prav tako ugotavlja, da na začetku postopka tudi nobeno drugo letališče ni izrazilo pomislekov glede širitve letališča Leipzig.
Nor has the Commission identified specific competition concerns vis-à-vis any other EU airport.
Komisija tudi ni ugotovila posebnih pomislekov glede konkurenčne zakonodaje v zvezi z drugimi letališči v Skupnosti.
On the basis of the above, the Commission can therefore conclude that the development of trade is not affected to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Komisija lahko torej na podlagi navedenega sklene, da vpliv na razvoj trgovine ni v nasprotju z interesom Skupnosti.
Incompatibility of the unlimited warranties under the Framework agreement and the comfort letter
Nezdružljivost neomejenih jamstev iz okvirnega sporazuma in patronatske izjave
As DHL has already benefited from the maximum amount of investment aid permissible under Article 87(3)(a) EC Treaty, the aid which DHL receives by the Framework Agreement and the comfort letter constitutes operating aid.
Ker je družba DHL že prejela najvišji znesek pomoči za naložbe, ki je dopusten v skladu s členom 87(3)(a) Pogodbe ES, je pomoč, ki jo družba DHL prejme v okviru okvirnega sporazuma in priporočilnega pisma, pomoč za tekoče poslovanje.
According to the regional aid guidelines [62], operating aid is normally prohibited.
V skladu s smernicami o regionalni pomoči [61] je pomoč za tekoče poslovanje običajno prepovedana.
Exceptionally, such aid may be granted in regions eligible under the derogation in Article 87(3)(a) EC Treaty provided that certain strict conditions are fulfilled [63].
Izjemoma se ta pomoč lahko dodeli regijam, ki so do nje upravičene na podlagi odstopanja od člena 87(3)(a) Pogodbe ES, če so izpolnjeni nekateri strogi pogoji [62].
As Germany has not provided any evidence that these conditions are met, the Commission finds that the operating aid to DHL is not compatible under Article 87(3)(a) EC Treaty.
Ker Nemčija ni predložila nobenih dokazov, da so ti pogoji izpolnjeni, Komisija ugotavlja, da pomoč za tekoče poslovanje družbi DHL ni združljiva s členom 87(3)(a) Pogodbe ES.
In absence of information proving the opposite, the Commission finds also that the aid to DHL does not fulfil any other objective of common interest.
Ker niso bile predložene informacije, ki bi dokazovale nasprotno, Komisija ugotavlja tudi, da pomoč družbi DHL ne izpolnjuje nobenega drugega cilja skupnega interesa.
Therefore, as none of the exceptions provided by Article 87(2) and Article 87(3) EC Treaty are applicable, the unlimited warranties granted by the Framework Agreement and the comfort letter have to be considered as incompatible with the common market.
Ker ni mogoče uporabiti nobene od izjem iz člena 87(2) in člena 87(3) Pogodbe ES, je treba neomejena jamstva iz okvirnega sporazuma in patronatske izjave obravnavati kot nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
Elimination of incompatible aid granted to DHL
Odprava nezdružljive pomoči, dodeljene družbi DHL
According to the Court of Justice's established case-law, the Commission is competent to decide that the state concerned must abolish or alter aid [64] when it has found that it is incompatible with the common market.
V skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti je Komisija pristojna za odločanje, ali mora zadevna država odpraviti ali spremeniti pomoč [63], če je bilo ugotovljeno, da je ta nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom. Sodišče ves čas vztraja tudi pri tem, da je obveznost države, da odpravi pomoč, ki jo Komisija šteje za nezdružljivo s skupnim trgom, namenjena za ponovno vzpostavitev prejšnjih razmer [64].
The Court has also consistently held that the obligation on a state to abolish aid regarded by the Commission as being incompatible with the common market is designed to re-establish the previously existing situation [65]. In this context, the Court has established that that objective is attained once the recipient has repaid the amounts granted by way of unlawful aid, thus forfeiting the advantage which it had enjoyed over its competitors on the market, and the situation prior to the payment of the aid is restored [66].
V zvezi s tem je Sodišče odločilo, da je ta cilj dosežen, ko prejemnik odplača znesek, ki mu je bil dodeljen v okviru nezakonite pomoči, s čimer izgubi prednost, ki jo je užival glede na konkurente na trgu, ter se ponovno vzpostavijo razmere pred plačilom pomoči [65].
Following that case-law, Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/99 [67] laid down that: ‘where negative decisions are taken in respect of unlawful aid, the Commission shall decide that the Member State concerned shall take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary (…).
V skladu s sodno prakso člen 14(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/99 določa, da „[če] se v primerih nezakonite pomoči sprejmejo negativne odločbe, Komisija odloči, da mora zadevna država članica sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, da upravičenec vrne pomoč (…).
The Commission shall not require recovery of the aid if this would be contrary to a general principle of Community law’.
Komisija ne zahteva vračila pomoči, če je to v nasprotju s splošnim načelom prava Skupnosti“.
To ensure that DHL does not enjoy any economic advantages out of the incompatible aid measures, the Commission considers three actions as necessary:
Za zagotovitev, da ukrepi nezdružljive pomoči družbi DHL ne omogočajo nobenih gospodarskih prednosti, so po mnenju Komisije nujni naslednji trije ukrepi:
The comfort letter must not be implemented.
patronatska izjava ne sme začeti veljati;
The unlimited warranties must be abolished.
neomejena jamstva je treba odpraviti;
As the unlimited warranties have covered the period from 1 October 2007 (which is the operations start date of the DHL hub) onwards, the aid which has already been put at the disposal of DHL must be recovered.
ker neomejena jamstva veljajo od 1. oktobra 2007 (ki je datum začetka obratovanja vozlišča DHL) naprej, mora družba DHL vrniti pomoč, ki ji je že bila dana na voljo.
For the calculation of the aid element which has already been put at the disposal of DHL, the Commission would firstly like to note that, according to the case-law of the Court of Justice, no provision of Community law requires the Commission, when ordering the recovery of aid declared incompatible with the common market, to fix the exact amount of the aid to be recovered.
V zvezi z izračunom dela pomoči, ki je že bil dan na voljo družbi DHL, Komisija najprej opozarja, da v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča nobena določba prava Skupnosti od Komisije ne zahteva, da pri zahtevi za povračilo pomoči, opredeljene kot nezdružljive s skupnim trgom, določi natančen znesek pomoči, ki ga je treba vrniti.
It is sufficient for the Commission's decision to include information enabling the recipient to work out himself, without overmuch difficulty, that amount [68].
Dovolj je, da odločba Komisije vključuje informacije, ki prejemniku omogočajo, da sam brez večjih težav opredeli ta znesek [66].
To quantify the aid element, the warranty fee needs to be calculated for the first months of the DHL hub operations starting on 1 October 2007 until the abolition of the unlimited warranty.
Za določitev zneska dela pomoči je treba pristojbino za jamstva izračunati od prvih mesecev po začetku obratovanja vozlišča DHL 1. oktobra 2007 do odprave neomejenih jamstev.
It has to be asked which fee would a private insurance have demanded on 21 September 2005, when the framework agreement was signed, for the period from 1 October 2007 until the abolition of the unlimited warranty.
Preveriti je treba, kakšno pristojbino bi zahtevala zasebna zavarovalnica 21. septembra 2005, ko je bil podpisan okvirni sporazum, za obdobje od 1. oktobra 2007 do odprave neomejenih jamstev.
In a competitive insurance market, the warranty fee will be equal to the expected risk costs which the warranty has to cover.
Na konkurenčnem zavarovalniškem trgu je pristojbina za jamstva enaka pričakovanemu tveganju, ki ga je treba zavarovati z jamstvom.
Germany has already provided an estimate of the expected risk costs of EUR […] for the complete […] years duration of the framework agreement. As already explained before, these risk costs result from the following calculation:
Nemčija je že predložila oceno pričakovanih stroškov tveganja, ki za celotno trajanje okvirnega sporazuma, tj. je […] let, znašajo […] EUR. Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 90, se ti stroški tveganja določijo z naslednjim izračunom:
Germany assumes that the compensation claims will linearly decrease over time as a result of the amortisation of DHL's investments.
Nemčija predvideva, da se bo število odškodninskih zahtevkov sčasoma linearno zmanjšalo zaradi amortizacije naložb družbe DHL.
Starting from the maximum of EUR […] in year […], this implies e.g. EUR […] in year […] and EUR […] in year […].
Če k temu znesku dodamo razliko v končnih vrednostih med dvema scenarijema ter vsoto prenesemo v leto 2006 po diskontni stopnji 6,5 %, dobimo vrednost […] EUR.
To simplify the analysis, Germany does not use a continuous probability distribution for the risk of a night flight ban but assumes that after half of the contract period — in year […] — a night flight restriction will be introduced with a probability of […] percent.
Za poenostavitev izračuna Nemčija ne uporablja stalne porazdelitve verjetnosti za tveganje prepovedi nočnih letov, ampak predvideva, da bo po preteku polovice pogodbenega obdobja – leta […] – verjetnost prepovedi nočnih letov […]-odstotna.
Multiplying the nominal damage claims of EUR […] in year […] by the probability of […] percent gives expected nominal risk of EUR […] in year […] and a discounted value to EUR […] for the expected risk costs.
S pomnožitvijo nominalnih odškodninskih zahtevkov v znesku […] EUR v letu […] z […]-odstotno verjetnostjo dobimo pričakovano nominalno tveganje v višini […] EUR za leto […] in diskontirano vrednost […] EUR za pričakovane stroške tveganja.
The Commission considers that for having a correct estimate of the risk costs, Germany has to change the following elements in its calculation:
Komisija meni, da mora Nemčija za pravilno oceno stroškov tveganja spremeniti naslednje elemente v svojem izračunu:
Contrary to Germany's assumption, certain parts of DHL's compensation claims will remain stable over time (e.g. costs for removal of equipment, damage claims by DHL clients for late delivery, etc.).
V nasprotju s predpostavko Nemčije bo višina nekaterih elementov odškodninskih zahtevkov družbe DHL ostala nespremenjena (npr. stroški za selitev, odškodninski zahtevki strank družbe DHL za zamudo pri dostavi itd.).
The development of the nominal damage claims over time must accordingly be adjusted.
V skladu s tem je treba prilagoditi višino odškodninskih zahtevkov.
Germany's calculation only focuses on the risk of a night flight ban.
Izračun Nemčije se osredotoča le na tveganje prepovedi nočnih letov.
The damage claims due to operational risks and their probability of entry must be estimated and the resulting net present value of these risk costs must be calculated.
Oceniti je treba odškodninske zahtevke zaradi obratovalnih tveganj in njihovo verjetnost ter izračunati neto čisto vrednost teh stroškov tveganja.
While the Commission could accept the simplified analysis proposed by Germany as regards the probability for the risk of a night flight ban, as regards the daily operational risks, the Commission considers that the probability must be estimated on an annual basis.
Medtem ko bi Komisija lahko sprejela poenostavljeno analizo, ki jo je Nemčija predlagala za verjetnost tveganja prepovedi nočnih letov, pa Komisija v zvezi z rednimi obratovalnimi tveganji meni, da je treba njihovo verjetnost oceniti vsako leto.
The time-series of the expected yearly damage claims must be discounted to arrive at the net present value for the daily operational risk.
Za izračun neto čiste vrednosti rednih obratovalnih tveganj je treba ustrezno diskontirati vsoto pričakovanih letnih odškodninskih zahtevkov.
Based on the re-estimated risk costs for the complete period of the framework agreement, Germany will have to accordingly apportion the risk costs to arrive at the warranty fee for the period from 1 October 2007 until the abolition of the unlimited warranty.
Na podlagi ponovno ocenjenih stroškov tveganja za celotno obdobje veljavnosti okvirnega sporazuma mora Nemčija določiti pristojbino za jamstvo za obdobje od 1. oktobra 2007 do odprave neomejenih jamstev.
In relation to the aid to the airport
Pomoč letališču
The Commission considers that the measure in question, which allows Leipzig-Halle airport to realise the investment project in accordance with the conditions described previously, is not prejudicial to the common interest and that the five criteria set out in the Guidelines have been satisfied in the present case.
Komisija ugotavlja, da zadevni ukrep, ki letališču Leipzig-Halle omogoča izvedbo naložbenega projekta v skladu z opisanimi pogoji, ne škoduje skupnemu interesu in da je pet meril iz smernic iz leta 2005 v obravnavanem primeru izpolnjenih.
In relation to the aid to DHL
Pomoč družbi DHL
The Commission finds that the unlimited warranties granted by the Framework Agreement and (the comfort letter constitute aid in the meaning of Article 87(1) EC Treaty because the Land Sachsen, MFAG, and Leipzig Airport hedge business risks for DHL at terms which a private investor would not have accepted.
Komisija ugotavlja, da neomejena jamstva, ki jih dodeljuje okvirni sporazum, in patronatska izjava pomenijo državno pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES, ker dežela Saška, MFAG in letališče Leipzig varujejo družbo DHL pred poslovnimi tveganji pod pogoji, ki jih ne bi sprejel noben zasebni vlagatelj.
As DHL has already benefited from the maximum amount of investment aid permissible under Article 87(3)(a) EC Treaty, the Commission considers that the unlimited warranties granted by the Framework Agreement and the comfort letter have to be considered as incompatible with the common market,
Ker je družba DHL že prejela najvišji znesek pomoči za naložbe, ki je dovoljen v okviru člena 87(3)(a) Pogodbe ES, Komisija meni, da je treba neomejena jamstva iz okvirnega sporazuma in patronatske izjave obravnavati kot nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom –
The State aid which Germany is planning to implement amounting to EUR 350 million in relation to the construction of a new runway and related airport infrastructure at Leipzig Halle Airport is compatible with the common market under Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty.
Državna pomoč v višini 350 milijonov EUR, ki jo Nemčija namerava nameniti za gradnjo nove vzletno-pristajalne steze in s tem povezane letališke infrastrukture na letališču Leipzig/Halle, je združljiva s skupnim trgom v skladu s členom 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES.
The State aid which Germany is planning to implement by granting the comfort letter in favour of DHL is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč, ki jo Nemčija namerava dodeliti družbi DHL s patronatsko izjavo, ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The aid may accordingly not be implemented.
Zato se ta pomoč ne sme dodeliti.
The State aid which Germany granted to DHL in the form of unlimited warranties (according to sections 8 and 9 of the Framework Agreement) is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč, ki jo je Nemčija dodelila družbi DHL v obliki neomejenih jamstev (v skladu z oddelkoma 8 in 9 okvirnega sporazuma), ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
These unlimited warranties granted by the Framework Agreement must accordingly be abolished.
Zato je treba ta neomejena jamstva iz okvirnega sporazuma odpraviti.
Germany shall recover the part of the aid referred to in Article 3 which has already been put at the disposal of DHL (i.e. the warranty fee for the period from 1 October 2007 until the abolition of the unlimited warranties).
Nemčija mora izterjati del pomoči iz člena 3, ki je že bil dan na voljo družbi DHL (tj. pristojbina za jamstvo za obdobje od 1. oktobra 2007 do odprave neomejenih jamstev).
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiary until their actual recovery.
Znesek, ki ga je treba vrniti, vključuje obresti od datuma, ko je bil dan na voljo upravičencu, do datuma njegovega dejanskega vračila.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 and to Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Obresti se izračunajo z obrestnoobrestnim računom v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004.
Recovery of the aid referred to in Article 3 which has already been put at the disposal of DHL shall be immediate and effective.
Pomoč iz člena 3, ki je že bila dana na voljo družbi DHL, se izterja takoj in dejansko.
Germany shall ensure that this decision is implemented within four months following the date of notification of this Decision.
Nemčija zagotovi, da se ta odločba izvede v štirih mesecih od datuma njene notifikacije.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Germany shall submit the following information to the Commission:
V dveh mesecih od notifikacije te odločbe Nemčija predloži Komisiji naslednje informacije:
the total amount (principal and recovery interests) to be recovered from the beneficiary;
skupni znesek (glavnica in obresti), ki ga mora upravičenec vrniti;
documents demonstrating that the beneficiary has been ordered to repay the aid.
dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da se je od upravičenca zahtevalo vračilo pomoči.
Germany shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 3 which has already been put at the disposal of DHL has been completed.
Nemčija obvešča Komisijo o napredku glede nacionalnih ukrepov, sprejetih za izvajanje te odločbe, dokler pomoč iz člena 3, ki je že bila dana na voljo družbi DHL, ni vrnjena v celoti.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Na zahtevo Komisije Nemčija nemudoma predloži vse informacije o že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepih za izpolnjevanje te odločbe.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiary
Nemčija zagotovi tudi podrobne podatke o zneskih pomoči in obrestih za vračilo pomoči, ki jih je upravičenec že vrnil.
Done at Brussels, 23 July 2008.
V Bruslju, 23. julija 2008.
Vice President
Podpredsednik
OJ C 48, 2.3.2007, p. 7.
UL C 48, 2.3.2007, str. 7.
1998 Multisectoral framework on regional aid for large investment projects (OL C 107, 7.4.1998, p. 7).
UL C 107, 7.4.1998, str. 7.
State Aid C 18/07 (ex N 874/06) — Training aid to DHL at Leipzig-Halle, Germany (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Državna pomoč C 18/2007 (prej N 874/06) – Pomoč za usposabljanje za družbo DHL v mestu Leipzig-Halle, Nemčija ), še ni objavljeno v UL.
Business secret.
Poslovna tajnost.
OJ C 71, 11.3.2000, p. 16 (paragraph 4.2).
UL C 71, 11.3.2000, str. 16 (odst. 4.2).
OJ C 155, 20.6.2008, p. 10.
UL C 155, 20.6.2008, str. 10.
Submission from Germany, 21 July 2006, p. 7.
Intenzivnosti pomoči ni mogoče natančno izračunati, ker Komisija ne more izključiti dejstva, da bi fiktivni zasebni vlagatelj zmanjšal svoje tveganje z naložbo manjšega zneska.
OJ C 350, 10.12.1994, p. 5.
Sodba sodišča prve stopnje Evropskih Skupnosti z dne 12. decembra 2000 v zadevi T-128/98, ZOdl. 2000, str. II-3929; potrjena s sodbo Sodišča z dne 24. oktobra 2002, C-82/01, ZOdl. 2002, str. I-9297.
Decision of 19 January 2005, N 644i/02 — German regional airports; Decision of 20 April 2005, N 355/04 — Antwerp Airport.
UL C 350, 10.12.1994, str. 5.
Decision of 10 July 2007, C 27/07 — Berlin Schönefeld Airport.
Odločba z dne 19. januarja 2005, N 644i/02 – Nemška regionalna letališča, UL C 126, 25.5.2005, str. 12; Odločba z dne 20. aprila 2005, N 355/04 – Letališče Antwerp, UL C 176, 16.6.2005, str. 11.
Expert report commissioned by the competent national authority as part of the planning approval procedure.
Odločba z dne 10. julija 2007, C 27/07 – Letališče Berlin Schönefeld.
Dimson E./Marsh P./Staunton M: Chapter 10, in Handbook of investments: Equity risk premium, Volume 1, 2007.
Strokovno poročilo, ki ga je kot del postopka za odobritev načrtovanja naročil pristojni nacionalni organ.
Discount factor (real discount rate) = [risk free rate + (market risk premium × β)] — rate of inflation.
Dimson E., Marsh P., Staunton M: Handbook of investments: Equity risk premium, 1. del, poglavje 10, 2007.
Establishing common rules in the field of civil aviation security (OJ L 355, 30.12.2002, p. 1).
Diskontni faktor (realna diskontna stopnja) = [varna stopnja + (premija tržnega tveganja × β)] – stopnja inflacije.
OJ L 24, 30.1.1998, p. 9.
UL L 355, 30.12.2002, str. 1.
Both fire stations have identical technical equipment; a replacement investment is necessary after 15 years.
UL L 24, 30.1.1998, str. 9.
Annex to the Convention on International Civil Aviation.
Obe gasilski postaji sta enako tehnično opremljeni; po 15 letih je treba zamenjati opremo.
OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1.
Priloga h Konvenciji o mednarodnem civilnem letalstvu.
This result can also be seen from the calculations in the annex which show that the cash-flow difference between running the southern runway with and without DHL amounts in 2005 to about EUR […] (compare the cash-flows in columns (4) and (5) of Table 1). If you add to this amount the difference in terminal values between the two scenarios and carry the sum forward to 2006 at the discount rate of 6,5 percent you also arrive at EUR […].
UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1.
Germany assumes that the compensation claims will linearly decrease over time as a result of the amortization of DHL's investments.
Ta rezultat je razviden iz izračunov v Prilogi, ki kažejo, da je razlika v denarnem toku med delovanjem južne vzletno-pristajalne steze z družbo DHL in brez nje v letu 2005 znašala približno […] EUR (primerjajte denarni tok v stolpcih (4) in (5) Tabele 1).