natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This provision merely ensured that vessels would be operational for the first five years, thus only for half of the time required by the Guidelines.
Ta določba zagotavlja le, da bodo plovila dejavna prvih pet let, torej le polovico časa, ki ga zahtevajo smernice.
Therefore, it is considered that the aid granted under the scheme for the acquisition of a share in a second-hand vessel is incompatible with the common market.
Zato se šteje, da pomoč, dodeljena v okviru sheme za nakup deleža v rabljenem plovilu, ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
Under Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, where negative decisions are taken in the case of unlawful aid, the Commission is to decide that the Member State concerned must take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary.
V skladu s členom 14(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999 mora Komisija, kadar so sprejete negativne odločitve v primeru nezakonite pomoči, odločiti, da mora zadevna država članica sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za vračilo pomoči od upravičenca.
The funds used for the financing of the scheme are the same funds used for the aids subject to the negative decisions taken by the Commission in Decisions 2003/612/EC and 2006/226/EC, as referred to in Recital 12 of the present Decision.
Sredstva, ki se uporabljajo za financiranje sheme, so enaka sredstva, kot se uporabljajo za pomoč, glede na negativne odločbe Komisije iz odločb 2003/612/ES in 2006/226/ES, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 12 te odločbe.
In those cases the Commission considered that these funds have to be regarded as State resources for the purposes of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
V navedenih primerih je Komisija menila, da je treba navedena sredstva obravnavati kot državna sredstva v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
The Commission considers, however, that in this case the elements taken into account in the Decisions 2003/612/EC and 2006/226/EC cannot be applied in the same way and the legitimate expectations have not been created.
Vendar Komisija meni, da se v tem primeru elementi, upoštevani v odločbah 2003/612/ES in 2006/226/ES, ne morejo uporabljati na enak način, zato niso nastala pravno utemeljena pričakovanja.
To reach that conclusion, the Commission observes that, unlike the aids the subject of Decisions 2003/612/EC and 2006/226/EC, the scheme in question has been set up as a normal aid scheme and concerns direct grants to fishermen, granted directly by the Shetland Islands Council.
Komisija je pri sprejemanju tega sklepa ugotovila, da je bila zadevna shema za razliko od pomoči, za katere veljata odločbi 2003/612/ES in 2006/226/ES, vzpostavljena kot običajna shema pomoči ter zadeva neposredno subvencije za ribiče, ki jih je neposredno dodelil Svet Shetlandskih otokov.
In fact, in response to questions raised by the Commission, the United Kingdom stated in its letter dated 10 December 2004 that: ‘payments under the schemes have been included in the Annual State Aid Inventory and sent to the Commission annually, as required, for many years’ and in its letter dated 6 April 2005 that ‘My authorities have, over many years, acted in good faith and in the belief that the Schemes were compliant with the State aid guidelines’.
Kot odgovor na vprašanja Komisije je Združeno kraljestvo z dopisom z dne 10. decembra 2004 dejansko navedlo, da: „so bila plačila na podlagi shem vključena v letni popis državnih pomoči in več let redno predložena Komisiji, kot je bilo zahtevano“; v dopisu z dne 6. aprila 2005 pa je navedlo: „Naši organi so več let delovali v dobri veri in prepričanju, da so sheme združljive s smernicami o državni pomoči.“
With regard to those statements and the circumstances of the case, the Commission therefore considers that requiring the recovery of the aid cannot be considered to be contradictory to a general principle of Community law.
Ob upoštevanju teh izjav in okoliščin primera Komisija zato meni, da zahteva za vračilo pomoči ni v nasprotju s splošnim načelom zakonodaje Skupnosti.
Thus, in accordance with Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, the Commission considers that United Kingdom must take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiaries of the scheme (regardless of the actions already taken), without prejudice to cases falling within the scope of Commission Regulation (EC) No 875/2007 of 24 July 2007 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to de minimis aid in the fisheries sector and amending Regulation (EC) No 1860/2004 [13].
Zato Komisija v skladu s členom 14(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999 meni, da mora Združeno kraljestvo sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za vračilo pomoči od upravičencev do sheme (ne glede na ukrepe, ki so že sprejeti) brez poseganja v primere, ki spadajo na področje uporabe Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 875/2007 z dne 24. julija 2007 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES za pomoč de minimis v ribiškem sektorju in o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 1860/2004 [13].
This interest should be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [14].
Te obresti je treba izračunati z obrestnoobrestnim računom v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 [14].
The United Kingdom should therefore ensure that also the recoveries already undertaken or still in progress will comply with this condition and, where such interest has not been included in the recovery, take the necessary measures to recover also the concerned amount of interest from those beneficiaries.
Združeno kraljestvo mora zato zagotoviti, da bodo tudi vračila, ki so že izvedena ali so v teku, v skladu s tem pogojem in da v primeru, ko take obresti niso bile vključene v vračilo, sprejme potrebne ukrepe za vračilo zadevnega zneska obresti od navedenih upravičencev.
The Commission would ask United Kingdom to return to it the attached questionnaire concerning the current status of the recovery procedure and to draw up a list of beneficiaries to which the recovery relates.
Komisija prosi Združeno kraljestvo, da ji vrne priloženi vprašalnik o sedanji stopnji v postopku vračanja in sestavi seznam upravičencev, ki jih zadeva vračilo.
In the light of the assessment made in Section IV, the Commission finds that the United Kingdom has, in breach of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty, unlawfully granted aid under the scheme.
Glede na oceno iz oddelka IV Komisija ugotavlja, da je Združeno kraljestvo s kršitvijo člena 88(3) Pogodbe ES nezakonito dodelilo pomoč na podlagi sheme.
The Commission considers that the aid granted under the scheme is not compatible with the common market as far as it concerns aid granted for the first time acquisition of a share in a second-hand fishing vessel.
Komisija meni, da pomoč, dodeljena v okviru sheme, ni združljiva s skupnim trgom, ker zadeva pomoč, dodeljeno za prvi nakup deleža v rabljenem ribiškem plovilu.
As, after 1 July 2001, no aid has been granted for the first time acquisition of a share in a new fishing vessel, all such aid granted under the scheme is considered compatible with the common market,
Ker po 1. juliju 2001 nobena pomoč ni bila dodeljena za prvi nakup deleža v novem ribiškem plovilu, se lahko vsa pomoč, dodeljena v okviru sheme, šteje za združljivo s skupnim trgom –
The State aid which the United Kingdom has implemented on the basis of the First time shareholder scheme (the scheme) is compatible with the common market as far as it concerns aid granted for the first time acquisition of a share in a new fishing vessel.
Državna pomoč, ki jo je Združeno kraljestvo dodelilo na podlagi Sheme delničarjev, ki to postanejo prvič („shema“), je združljiva s skupnim trgom, če gre za pomoč, dodeljeno za prvi nakup deleža v novem ribiškem plovilu.
The State aid which the United Kingdom has implemented on the basis of the scheme is incompatible with the common market as far as it concerns aid granted for the first time acquisition of a share in a second-hand fishing vessel.
Državna pomoč, ki jo je Združeno kraljestvo dodelilo na podlagi sheme, ni združljiva s skupnim trgom, ker zadeva pomoč, dodeljeno za prvi nakup deleža v rabljenem ribiškem plovilu.
Individual aid referred to in Article 1(2) of this Decision does not constitute aid if it fulfils the conditions of Commission Regulation (EC) No 875/2007.
Posamezna pomoč iz člena 1(2) te odločbe ne pomeni pomoči, če izpolnjuje pogoje iz Uredbe (ES) št. 875/2007.
The United Kingdom shall take all necessary measures to recover from the beneficiaries the aid granted under the scheme referred to in Article 1(2), other than that referred to in Article 2.
Združeno kraljestvo sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe za vračilo pomoči, dodeljene na podlagi sheme iz člena 1(2), od upravičencev, razen pomoči iz člena 2.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) 794/2004.
Obresti je treba izračunati z obrestnoobrestnim računom v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, the United Kingdom shall submit the following information to the Commission:
Združeno kraljestvo v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tej odločbi Komisiji predloži naslednje podatke:
the list of beneficiaries that have received aid referred to Article 1 of this Decision that does not fulfil the conditions laid down by Regulation (EC) No 875/2007, and the total amount of aid received by each of them;
seznam upravičencev, ki so prejeli pomoč iz člena 1 te odločbe, ki ne izpolnjuje pogojev iz Uredbe (ES) št. 875/2007, in skupni znesek pomoči, ki jo je prejel vsak upravičenec;
total amount (principal and interests) to be recovered from each beneficiary;
skupni znesek (glavnica in obresti), ki ga mora vrniti vsak upravičenec;
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision; and
podroben opis že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepov za uskladitev s to odločbo in
documents demonstrating that the beneficiaries have been ordered to repay the aid.
dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da je bilo upravičencem naročeno, da vrnejo pomoč.
It shall also provide detail information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiaries.
Prav tako predloži podrobne podatke o zneskih pomoči in obrestnih merah za vračilo pomoči, ki so jih upravičenci že vrnili.
OJ C 291, 30.11.2006, p. 5.
UL C 291, 30.11.2006, str. 5.
OJ C 260, 17.9.1994, p. 3; OJ C 100, 27.3.1997, p. 12; and OJ C 19, 20.1.2001, p. 7.
UL C 260, 17.9.1994, str. 3. UL C 100, 27.3.1997, str. 12. in UL C 19, 20.1.2001, str. 7.
Guidelines of 1994 and 1997.
Smernice iz let 1994 in 1997.
Guidelines of 2001.
Smernice iz leta 2001.
Point 2.2.3.3(c) of the Guidelines for the examination of State aid to fisheries and aquaculture of 2001.
Točka 2.2.3.3(c) Smernic za pregled državne pomoči za ribištvo in ribogojstvo iz leta 2001.
OJ L 211 of 21.8.2003, p. 63.
UL L 211, 21.8.2003, str. 63.
OJ L 81 of 18.3.2006, p. 36.
UL L 81, 18.3.2006, str. 36.
amending Decision 2005/879/EC authorising methods for grading pig carcases in Slovenia
o spremembi Odločbe 2005/879/ES o odobritvi metode za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov v Sloveniji
(notified under document number C(2008) 554)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 554)
Commission Decision 2005/879/EC [2] authorises two methods (Zwei-Punkt — DM5 and Hennessy Grading Probe) for grading pig carcases in Slovenia.
Z Odločbo Komisije 2005/879/ES [2] sta odobreni dve metodi (Zwei-Punkt – DM5 in Hennessy Grading Probe) za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov v Sloveniji.
In view of technical developments, Slovenia has asked the Commission to authorise an update of the formulae and has presented the results of its dissection trials in the second part of the protocol provided for in Article 3(3) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85 of 24 October 1985 laying down detailed rules for the application of the Community scale for grading pig carcases [3].
Slovenija je prosila Komisijo, naj ji odobri posodobitev enačb zaradi tehničnega razvoja, in ji je predložila rezultate svojih preskusov razseka v drugem delu protokola v skladu s členom 3(3) Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2967/85 z dne 24. oktobra 1985 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo lestvice Skupnosti za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov [3].
Examination of this request has revealed that the conditions for authorising those grading methods are fulfilled.
Preučitev tega zahtevka je pokazala, da so pogoji za odobritev metod razvrščanja izpolnjeni.
The ZP-DM5 grading method has been authorised by Decision 2005/879/EC until 31 December 2007.
Metoda za razvrščanje ZP-DM5 je bila odobrena z Odločbo 2005/879/ES do 31. decembra 2007.
Due to delay for examination of the requested updated methods, the authorisation should be maintained until this Decision applies.
Zaradi zamude pri pregledu zahtevka za posodobljene metode odobritev velja do začetka uporabe te odločbe.
Decision 2005/879/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 2005/879/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The Annex to Decision 2005/879/EC is hereby replaced by the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga k Odločbi 2005/879/ES se nadomesti s Prilogo k tej odločbi.
By way of derogation from the second paragraph of Article 1 of Decision 2005/879/EC, the ZP-DM5 grading method set out in the Annex to that Decision shall continue to be applicable until the notification of the present Decision.
Z odstopanjem od drugega odstavka člena 1 Odločbe 2005/879/ES se bo metoda za razvrščanje ZP-DM5 iz Priloge k navedeni odločbi še naprej uporabljala, in sicer do priglasitve te odločbe.
OJ L 324, 10.12.2005, p. 87.
UL L 324, 10.12.2005, str. 87.
METHODS FOR GRADING PIG CARCASSES IN SLOVENIA
METODE ZA RAZVRŠČANJE PRAŠIČJIH TRUPOV V SLOVENIJI
Grading of pig carcasses shall be carried out by means of the method termed “Zwei-Punkt — DM5 (ZP)”.
Razvrščanje prašičjih trupov se opravi z metodo, imenovano ‚Zwei-Punkt – DM5 (ZP)‘.
The lean meat content of the carcasse shall be calculated according to the following formula:
Delež mesnatosti trupa se izračuna po naslednji enačbi:
Ŷ estimated percentage of lean meat in the carcasse
Ŷ ocenjeni odstotek mesnatosti trupa
minimum thickness of visible (back) fat (including rind) on the midline of the split carcasse in millimetres, covering the lumbar muscle (Musculus glutaeus medius)
najmanjša debelina vidne (hrbtne) slanine (vključno s kožo), ki pokriva ledvično mišico (Musculus glutaeus medius), merjena na vzdolžni osi razkosanega trupa v milimetrih
visible thickness of the lumbar muscle on the midline of split carcasse in millimetres, measured as the shortest connection between the front (cranial) end of lumbar muscle and the upper (dorsal) edge of the vertebral canal
vidna debelina ledvene mišice na vzdolžni osi razkosanega trupa v milimetrih, merjena kot najkrajša razdalja med sprednjim (lobanjskim) koncem ledvene mišice in gornjim (hrbtnim) robom hrbteničnega kanala
This formula shall be valid for carcasses weighing between 50 and 120 kg.
Ta enačba velja za trupe, ki tehtajo med 50 in 120 kilogramov.
Grading of pig carcasses shall be carried out by means of the apparatus termed “Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP 4)”.
Razvrščanje prašičjih trupov se opravi z napravo, imenovano ‚Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP 4)‘.
The apparatus shall be equipped with a probe of 5,95 millimetres diameter (and of 6,3 millimetres at the blade on top of the probe) containing a photodiode (Siemens LED of the type LYU 260-EO) and photodetector of the type 58 MR and having an operating distance of between 0 and 120 millimetres.
Naprava je opremljena s sondo premera 5,95 milimetra (in 6,3 mm na jezičku na vrhu sonde), ki vsebuje fotodiodo (Siemens LED tipa LYU 260-EO) in fotodetektor tipa 58 MR ter ima obratovalno razdaljo med 0 in 120 milimetrov.
the thickness of back fat (including rind) in millimetres, measured at 7 cm off the midline of the carcasse between the third and fourth last rib
debelina hrbtne slanine (vključno s kožo) v milimetrih, merjena 7 cm lateralno od vzdolžne osi trupa med tretjim in četrtim zadnjim rebrom
the thickness of muscle in millimetres measured at the same time and same place as FHGP4
debelina mišice v milimetrih, merjena istočasno in na istem mestu kot FHGP4
This formula shall be valid for carcasses weighing between 50 and 120 kg.’
Ta enačba velja za trupe, ki tehtajo med 50 in 120 kilogramov.“
of 20 February 2008
z dne 20. februarja 2008
setting up the organisational structure for the European Network for Rural Development
o organizacijski strukturi Evropske mreže za razvoj podeželja
A European Network for Rural Development for the networking of national networks, organisations and administrations active in the field of rural development at Community level was put in place in accordance with Article 67 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005.
V skladu s členom 67 Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 se je za povezovanje nacionalnih mrež, organizacij in uprav, ki delujejo na področju razvoja podeželja na ravni Skupnosti, vzpostavila Evropska mreža za razvoj podeželja.
It is necessary to adopt implementing rules in order to lay down the organisational structure for the Network.
Zato da bi lahko določili organizacijsko strukturo mreže, je treba sprejeti izvedbena pravila.
In order to prepare and implement the activities provided for in Article 67(a) to (f) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, a Coordination committee should be established within the European Network for Rural Development.
Znotraj Evropske mreže za razvoj podeželja je treba ustanoviti koordinacijski odbor, ki bo pripravljal in izvajal dejavnosti iz točk (a) do (f) člena 67 Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005.
Therefore the organisational structure, tasks and procedural rules of the Coordination committee should be defined.
Zato je treba opredeliti organizacijsko strukturo koordinacijskega odbora, njegove naloge in poslovnik.
In order to support the national networks and transnational cooperation initiatives as referred to in Article 67(f) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, a separate Leader subcommittee should be set up under the Coordination committee.
Za podporo nacionalnim mrežam in pobudam za čezmejno sodelovanje v skladu s členom 67(f) Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 je treba v okviru koordinacijskega odbora ustanoviti ločen Pododbor za Leader.
The composition and the tasks of this subcommittee should be defined.
Opredeliti je treba sestavo in naloge navedenega pododbora.
In order to set up and run expert networks with a view to facilitating an exchange of expertise and supporting implementation and evaluation of the rural development policy as provided for in Article 67(e) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, an Expert committee on Evaluation of Rural Development Programmes should be established.
Za vzpostavitev in upravljanje strokovnih mrež, da se olajša izmenjava strokovnih znanj ter podpirata izvajanje in vrednotenje politike razvoja podeželja v skladu s členom 67(e) Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005, je treba ustanoviti strokovni odbor za vrednotenje programov za razvoj podeželja.
The composition and the tasks of this committee should be defined.
Opredeliti je treba sestavo in naloge navedenega odbora.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Rural Development Committee,
Ukrepi, predvideni s tem sklepom, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za razvoj podeželja –
Coordination committee
Koordinacijski odbor
The Coordination committee of the European Network for Rural Development (hereinafter the Coordination committee) is hereby established.
Ustanovi se Koordinacijski odbor Evropske mreže za razvoj podeželja (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Koordinacijski odbor“).
The Coordination committee shall, in particular:
Koordinacijski odbor zlasti:
assist the Commission in the preparation and implementation of activities provided for in Article 67 (a) to (f) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005;
pomaga Komisiji pri pripravljanju in izvajanju dejavnosti iz točk (a) do (f) člena 67 Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005;
ensure coordination between the European Network for Rural Development, the national rural networks referred to in Article 68 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, and organisations active in rural development at Community level;
zagotavlja usklajevanje med Evropsko mrežo za razvoj podeželja, nacionalnimi mrežami za podeželje iz člena 68 Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 in organizacijami, ki delujejo na področju razvoja podeželja na ravni Skupnosti;
advise the Commission on the annual work programme of the European Network for Rural Development and contribute to the choice and coordination of thematic work carried out by the European Network for Rural Development;
svetuje Komisiji v zvezi z letnim delovnim programom Evropske mreže za razvoj podeželja ter sodeluje pri izbiri in usklajevanju tematskega dela, ki ga izvaja Evropska mreža za razvoj podeželja;
propose, as appropriate, to the Commission the creation of thematic working groups.
Komisiji po potrebi predlaga oblikovanje tematskih delovnih skupin.
Evaluation networking activities covered by Article 5 shall be excluded from the tasks mentioned in the first subparagraph.
Dejavnosti vrednotenja v okviru mrežnega povezovanja iz člena 5 se izključijo iz nalog, ki jih določa prvi pododstavek.
Appointment and operation of Coordination committee
Imenovanje in delovanje Koordinacijskega odbora
The Coordination committee shall be composed of 69 members among which:
Koordinacijski odbor sestavlja 69 članov, med njimi:
27 representatives shall be from national competent authorities (one representative from each Member State);
27 predstavnikov pristojnih nacionalnih organov (po en predstavnik vsake države članice);
27 representatives shall be from national rural networks (one representative from each Member State);
27 predstavnikov nacionalnih mrež za podeželje (po en predstavnik vsake države članice);
12 representatives shall be from organisations active in the field of rural development at Community level;
12 predstavnikov organizacij, ki delujejo na področju razvoja podeželja na ravni Skupnosti;
two representatives shall be from the Leader subcommittee provided for in Article 4;
dva predstavnika Pododbora za Leader iz člena 4;
one representative shall be from a European organisation representing local action groups referred to in Article 62 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005.
en predstavnik ene od evropskih organizacij, ki zastopajo lokalne akcijske skupine iz člena 62 Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005.
The organisations referred to in paragraph 1(c) shall be selected by the Commission from the members of the Advisory group on rural development established by Commission Decision 2004/391/EC [2], after having consulted that group.The Commission shall select for each of the following objectives a maximum of four organisations whose main purpose and activity correspond to those objectives:
Komisija med članicami Svetovalne skupine za razvoj podeželja, določenimi z Odločbo Komisije 2004/391/ES [2], po posvetovanju z navedeno skupino izbere organizacije iz točke (c) odstavka 1.Komisija za vsakega od naslednjih ciljev izbere največ štiri organizacije, ki po osnovnem namenu in dejavnostih ustrezajo tem ciljem:
improving the competitiveness of agriculture and forestry;
izboljšanje konkurenčnosti kmetijstva in gozdarstva;
improving the environment and the countryside;
izboljšanje okolja in podeželja;
improving quality of life in rural areas and diversification of the rural economy.
izboljšanje kakovosti življenja na podeželskih območjih in raznolikosti podeželskega gospodarstva.
The organisations selected shall designate one of its members as representatives in the Coordination committee.
Izbrane organizacije imenujejo enega od svojih članov za predstavnika v Koordinacijskem odboru.
The Coordination committee shall be chaired by a representative of the Commission.
Koordinacijskemu odboru predseduje predstavnik Komisije.
The chair shall convene the Coordination committee at least once a year.
Predsednik skliče Koordinacijski odbor najmanj enkrat letno.
Thematic working group
Tematska delovna skupina
A thematic working group established in accordance with Article 1(2)(d) shall have a defined mandate and shall be chaired by a representative of the Commission.
Tematska delovna skupina, ustanovljena v skladu s členom 1(2)(d), ima določen mandat in ji predseduje predstavnik Komisije.