natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Moreover, production of dihydromyrcenol is not labour-intensive.
Poleg tega proizvodnja dihidromircenola ni delovno intenzivna.
It is thus considered that the increased salaries could not have contributed to the Community industry’s losses.
Zato se ocenjuje, da povečane plače niso mogle prispevati k izgubam industrije Skupnosti.
Following the final disclosure, the same exporting producer adduced several new arguments concerning causation.
Po končnem razkritju je isti proizvajalec izvoznik ponudil več novih argumentov glede vzročne zveze.
These can be summarised as follows: (i) the injury was self-inflicted by imports of the product concerned made by the Community producer referred to in recital 17 above; (ii) the injury was self-inflicted by massive investments made by the Community industry in their new production capacity and by the loans taken for this purpose from financial institutions; (iii) the development of export sales of the Community industry was not analysed; (iv) the injury was self-inflicted by increasing the production capacity and hiring additional qualified labour and, thus, increasing the production costs.
Lahko se jih povzame na naslednji način: (i) škodo je povzročil sam proizvajalec Skupnosti iz uvodne izjave 17 z uvozom zadevnega izdelka, (ii) škodo je povzročila sama industrija Skupnosti z obsežnimi vlaganji v svoje nove proizvodne zmogljivosti in s posojili, ki jih je v ta namen vzela pri finančnih institucijah, (iii) razvoja izvoznih prodaj industrije Skupnosti se ni analiziralo, (iv) škodo je povzročila sama industrija Skupnosti s povečanjem proizvodne zmogljivosti in zaposlovanjem dodatne izobražene delovne sile, s čimer so se povečali proizvodni stroški.
In respect of these new arguments, it is noted that (i) imports of the product concerned made by one of the Community producers could not have affected the overall situation of the Community industry because they were minor (see recitals 17 and 20 above).
V zvezi s temi novimi argumenti je treba opozoriti, da (i) uvoz zadevnega izdelka enega od proizvajalcev ni mogel vplivati na celotni položaj industrije Skupnosti, ker je bil manjši (glej uvodni izjavi 17 in 20 zgoraj).
In addition, it is recalled that these imports had been made in reaction to the massive influx of the dumped imports from India and the losses caused to the Community industry thereby, i.e. after the material injury had already taken place; (ii) no new investments whatsoever into the production capacity took place during the period considered; on the contrary, capacity remained unchanged and investment significantly decreased (see recitals 45 and 49 of the provisional Regulation); (iii) the export performance of the Community industry was analysed in recital 68 of the provisional Regulation and was not found breaking the causal link; and (iv) no additional labour was hired by the Community industry.
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da je bil uvoz odgovor na velik dotok dampinškega uvoza iz Indije in izgube, ki jih je zaradi tega utrpela industrija Skupnosti, tj. po tem, ko je bila že storjena znatna škoda; (ii) v obravnavanem obdobju ni bilo nobenih novih vlaganj v proizvodno zmogljivost; ravno nasprotno, zmogljivost je ostala nespremenjena, vlaganja pa so se bistveno zmanjšala (glej uvodni izjavi 45 in 49 začasne uredbe); (iii) izvoz industrije Skupnosti je bil analiziran v uvodni izjavi 68 začasne uredbe in ni pretrgal vzročne zveze ter (iv) industrija Skupnosti ni zaposlila nobene dodatne delovne sile.
As can be seen from recital 51 of the provisional Regulation, the employment decreased by 15 % between 2003 and the IP.
Kot je razvidno iz uvodne izjave 51 začasne uredbe, se je med letom 2003 in OP zaposlitev zmanjšala za 15 %.
The changes in employment structure were achieved by laying-off unqualified labour.
Spremembe v zaposlitveni strukturi so bile dosežene z odpuščanjem nezadostno izobražene delovne sile.
As to the production capacity, it is recalled that no expansion whatsoever took place.
V zvezi s proizvodno zmogljivostjo je treba opozoriti, da se sploh ni povečala.
The arguments cited in recital 26 above are thus rejected.
Zato se argumenti iz uvodne izjave 26, zavrnejo.
In view of the above and in the absence of any other comments concerning causation, recitals 57 to 76 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega in ker v zvezi z vzročno zvezo ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 57 do 76 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One exporting producer submitted that imposing measures would greatly disturb importers and users in the Community, thereby jeopardising thousands of jobs and tax revenues, but did not adduce any evidence in this respect.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je navedel, da bi uvedba ukrepov znatno ovirala uvoznike in uporabnike v Skupnosti, s čimer bi ogrozila na tisoče služb in davčnih prihodkov, vendar v zvezi s tem ni navedel nobenih dokazov.
These allegations were considered irrelevant.
Te obtožbe so bile opredeljene kot nepomembne.
Indeed, none of the importers and users opposed the provisional conclusions concerning their interest (see recitals 87 and 88 of the provisional Regulation), which has shown that these parties were not likely to be substantially affected by any anti-dumping measures.
Nihče od uvoznikov in uporabnikov namreč ni nasprotoval začasnim sklepnim ugotovitvam v zvezi z njihovimi interesi (glej uvodni izjavi 87 in 88 začasne uredbe), kar kaže na to, da ne obstaja verjetnost, da so na te stranke protidampinški ukrepi znatno vplivali.
The exporting producer was also informed that exporting producers are normally not considered parties concerned by the Community interest analysis.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je bil obveščen tudi, da proizvajalci izvozniki običajno niso med strankami, ki bi jih zadevala analiza interesa Skupnosti.
Following the final disclosure, this exporting producer reiterated its claim and submitted that it had right to comment on any aspect of the anti-dumping proceeding, Community interest included.
Po končnem razkritju je ta proizvajalec izvoznik ponovil svojo trditev in navedel, da ima pravico izraziti pripombe na kateri koli vidik protidampinškega postopka, vključno z interesom Skupnosti.
No substantiated arguments were, however, brought forward, which could alter the conclusions drawn in recital 29 above.
Izraženi niso bili nobeni utemeljeni argumenti, ki bi lahko spremenili sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 29 zgoraj.
In respect of the exporting producers’ rights to raise comments on any aspect of the proceeding, it is noted that they are indeed not barred from doing so.
V zvezi s pravicami proizvajalca izvoznika za izražanje pripomb na kateri koli vidik postopka je treba opozoriti, da glede tega res ni prepovedi.
Nevertheless, according to Article 21(2) of the basic Regulation, these parties are normally not concerned by the Community interest analysis and their comments may be disregarded, in particular when they are not supported by any factual evidence.
Vendar v skladu s členom 21(2) osnovne uredbe te stranke analiza interesa Skupnosti običajno ne zadeva in se lahko njihove pripombe razveljavijo, zlasti kadar niso podprte z dejanskimi dokazi.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the Community interest assessment, recitals 77 to 90 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z oceno interesa Skupnosti ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 77 do 90 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
It is recalled that one exporting producer submitted that the Community producer which had made substantial imports of dihydromyrcenol from India in the IP should be excluded from the definition of the Community industry and consequently the injury elimination level determination should be based on the remaining two Community producers only.
Treba je opozoriti, da je po navedbah enega proizvajalca treba proizvajalca Skupnosti, ki je uvozil znatno količino dihidromircenola iz Indije v OP, izločiti iz opredelitve industrije Skupnosti in da posledično določita stopnjo odpravljanja škode zgolj preostala dva proizvajalca Skupnosti.
As explained in recitals 14 and 15 above, this claim was not found justified.
Kot je razloženo v uvodnih izjavah 14 in 15 zgoraj, ta trditev ni upravičena.
In this view and in the absence of any other comments concerning the injury elimination level, recitals 92 to 94 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
V tej zvezi in ker v zvezi s stopnjo odpravljanja škode ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 92 do 94 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Form and level of measures
Oblika in raven ukrepov
In the light of the foregoing, and in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed at the level of the dumping margins found, since for both cooperating exporting producers the injury elimination level was found to be higher than the dumping margin.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno in v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe je treba uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na ravni ugotovljene stopnje dampinga, ker je bilo za vse zadevne proizvajalce izvoznike ugotovljeno, da je stopnja odprave škode višja kot stopnja dampinga.
With reference to recitals 14 and 15 above, it is considered appropriate to set the duty for any other companies, which had not cooperated in the investigation, at the level of the higher duty to be imposed on the cooperating companies.
V zvezi z uvodnimi izjavami 14 in 15 zgoraj se zdi primerno določiti dajatev za preostale družbe, ki niso sodelovale v preiskavi, na ravni najvišje dajatve, uvedene za sodelujoče družbe.
On the basis of the above, the definitive duty rates are as follows:
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega so dokončne dajatve naslednje:
All other companies (including Privi Organics Limited, Mumbai)
Vse druge družbe (vključno s Privi Organics Limited, Mumbai)
Following the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of definitive anti-dumping measures, Neeru Enterprises proposed a price undertaking in accordance with Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih naj bi se priporočila uvedba dokončnih protidampinških dajatev, je podjetje Neeru Enterprises ponudilo cenovno zavezo v skladu s členom 8(1) osnovne uredbe.
However, it is noted that the product concerned has shown in the last years a considerable volatility in prices and therefore it is not suitable for a fixed price undertaking.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da je imel zadevni izdelek v zadnjih letih precej nestanovitne cene in zato ni primeren za določeno cenovno zavezo.
As an alternative approach, the possibility of indexing the minimum import price to the price of the main raw material, namely alpha-pinene, was explored.
Kot alternativni pristop se je raziskala možnost indeksiranja najnižje uvozne cene na ceno glavne surovine, alfa-pinena.
However, this alternative was also not found workable for the following reasons: (i) the fluctuation in the price of the product concerned cannot be sufficiently explained by the fluctuation in the price of alpha-pinene, and (ii) alpha-pinene is not a commodity product for which any generally accessible statistics showing its market prices would be available.
Vendar se je ta alternativa izkazala za neuporabno iz naslednjih razlogov: (i) nihanja cen zadevnega izdelka ni mogoče dovolj pojasniti z nihanjem cen alfa-pinena in (ii) alfa-pinen ni blagovni izdelek, za katerega bi bili na voljo kakršni koli splošno dostopni statistični podatki, ki bi prikazovali njegove tržne cene.
On the basis of the above, it was concluded that any price undertaking is impractical in this case and therefore cannot be accepted.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je kakršna koli cenovna zaveza v tej zadevi nepraktična in zato nesprejemljiva.
The exporter concerned was informed accordingly and given an opportunity to comment.
Zadevni izvoznik je bil o tem obveščen, dobil pa je tudi možnost izraziti pripombe.
However, its comments have not altered the above conclusion.
Vendar njegove pripombe niso spremenile zgoraj navedenih sklepnih ugotovitev.
Therefore, it reflects the situation found during that investigation with respect to this company.
Zato odraža stanje te družbe, ki je bilo ugotovljeno med navedeno preiskavo.
This duty rate (as opposed to the country-wide duty applicable to all other companies) is thus exclusively applicable to imports of products originating in the country concerned and produced by the company and thus by the specific legal entity mentioned.
Ta stopnja dajatve (v nasprotju z dajatvijo za celotno državo, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“) se tako uporablja izključno za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz Indije, ki jih proizvaja ta družba, tj. posebej navedena pravna oseba.
Any claim requesting the application of this individual company anti-dumping duty rate (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company’s activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for example, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo te stopnje protidampinške dajatve za posamezno družbo (npr. zaradi spremembe imena družbe ali zaradi ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov) je treba nemudoma vložiti pri Komisiji skupaj z vsemi potrebnimi informacijami, zlasti o vsaki spremembi dejavnosti družbe na področju proizvodnje ter domače in izvozne prodaje, ki je povezana s to spremembo imena ali spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov.
If appropriate, the Regulation will then be amended accordingly by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual duty rates.
Komisija bo, če bo primerno, po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom Uredbo ustrezno spremenila, tako da bo prilagodila seznam družb, za katere veljajo individualne stopnje dajatev.
In view of the magnitude of the dumping margins found and in the light of the level of the injury caused to the Community industry, it is considered necessary that the amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty imposed by the provisional Regulation, be collected definitively to the extent of the amount of the duty definitively imposed by the present Regulation.
Glede na višino ugotovljenih stopenj dampinga in glede na stopnjo škode, povzročene industriji Skupnosti, se šteje, da je treba zneske, zavarovane z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo, uvedeno z začasno uredbo, tj. Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 896/2007, dokončno pobrati v višini zneska s to uredbo dokončno uvedene dajatve.
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of dihydromyrcenol of a purity by weight of 93 % or more, falling within CN code ex29052290 (TARIC code 2905229010), originating in India.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz dihidromircenola s čistočo 93 mas. % ali več, ki se uvršča pod oznako KN ex29052290 (oznaka TARIC 2905229010), s poreklom iz Indije.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, for products manufactured by the companies listed below shall be as follows:
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, veljavne za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti pred plačilom za izdelke, ki jih proizvedejo spodaj navedena podjetja, je:
Amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 896/2007 on imports of dihydromyrcenol of a purity by weight of 93 % or more, falling within CN code ex29052290 (TARIC code 2905229010), originating in India, shall be definitively collected in accordance with the rules set out above.
Zneske, zavarovane z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 896/2007 o uvozu dihidromircenola s čistočo 93 mas. % ali več, ki se uvršča pod oznako KN ex29052290 (oznaka TARIC 2905229010), s poreklom iz Indije, je treba dokončno pobrati v skladu z zgoraj določenimi pravili.
OJ L 196, 28.7.2007, p. 3.
UL L 196, 28.7.2007, str. 3.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 64/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 64/2008
This Regulation shall enter into force on 26 January 2008.
Ta uredba začne veljati 26. januarja 2008.
to Commission Regulation of 25 January 2008 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 25. januarja 2008 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 65/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 65/2008
opening tariff quotas for 2008 and for the following years for imports into the European Community of certain goods originating in Norway resulting from the processing of agricultural products covered by Council Regulation (EC) No 3448/93
o odprtju tarifnih kvot za leto 2008 in naslednja leta za uvoz v Evropsko skupnost nekaterega blaga s poreklom iz Norveške, izdelanega s predelavo kmetijskih proizvodov, ki jih zajema Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 3448/93
It is necessary to open these quotas for 2008 and the years after.
Te kvote je treba odpreti za leto 2008 in naslednja leta.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee on horizontal questions concerning trade in processed agricultural products not listed in Annex I of the Treaty,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Upravljalnega odbora za horizontalna vprašanja v zvezi s trgovino s predelanimi kmetijskimi proizvodi, ki niso navedeni v Prilogi I k Pogodbi –
The Community tariff quotas for the goods originating in Norway which are listed in the Annex shall be opened for 1 January to 31 December 2008 and for the following years.
Tarifne kvote Skupnosti za blago s poreklom iz Norveške s seznama v Prilogi se odprejo za obdobje od 1. januarja do 31. decembra 2008 in naslednja leta.
Annual quota volume from 1.1.2008
Obseg letne kvote od 1.1.2008
Undenatured ethyl alcohol of an alcohol strength by volume of 80 % vol. or higher, other than that obtained from agricultural products listed in Annex I to the EEC Treaty
Nedenaturiran etilni alkohol, z vsebnostjo alkohola 80 vol. % ali več, razen izdelkov, dobljenih iz kmetijskih proizvodov, navedenih v Aneksu I k Pogodbi ES
Ethyl alcohol and other spirits, denatured, of any strength, other than that obtained from agricultural products listed in Annex I to the EEC Treaty
Denaturiran etilni alkohol in drugi destilati, s katero koli vsebnostjo alkohola, razen izdelkov, dobljenih iz kmetijskih proizvodov, navedenih v Prilogi I k Pogodbi ES
Commission Regulation (EC) No 66/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 66/2008
opening a yearly tariff quota for 2008 and the following years applicable to the importation into the European Community of certain goods originating in Norway resulting from the processing of agricultural products covered by Council Regulation (EC) No 3448/93
o odprtju letne tarifne kvote za leto 2008 in naslednja leta za uvoz v Evropsko skupnost nekaterega blaga s poreklom iz Norveške, izdelanega s predelavo kmetijskih proizvodov, ki jih zajema Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 3448/93
It is necessary to open that quota for 2008 and the following years.
To kvoto je treba odpreti za leto 2008 in naslednja leta.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee on horizontal questions concerning trade in processed products not listed in Annex I to the Treaty,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Upravljalnega odbora za horizontalna vprašanja glede trgovine s predelanimi proizvodi, ki niso našteti v Prilogi I k Pogodbi –
From 1 January to 31 December 2008 and the years after, the goods originating in Norway and imported into the Community which are listed in the Annex shall be subject to the duties set out in that Annex within the limits of the annual quota indicated therein.
Od 1. januarja do 31. decembra 2008 in naslednja leta veljajo za blago s poreklom iz Norveške in uvoženo v Skupnost, ki je navedeno v Prilogi, dajatve, določene v tej prilogi, v mejah letne kvote, navedene v tej prilogi.
Chocolate and other food preparations containing cocoa with the exception of cocoa powder containing added sugar or other sweetening matter falling within CN code 180610
Čokolada in druga živila, ki vsebujejo kakav, razen kakava v prahu z dodatkom sladkorja ali drugih sladil, uvrščena pod oznako KN 180610
Commission Regulation (EC) No 67/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 67/2008
Having regard to Council Directive 92/83/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages [1], and in particular Article 27(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 92/83/EGS z dne 19. oktobra 1992 o uskladitvi strukture trošarin za alkohol in alkoholne pijače [1] ter zlasti člena 27(4) Direktive,
Commission Regulation (EC) No 3199/93 [2] provides that the denaturants which are employed in each Member State for the purposes of completely denaturing alcohol in accordance with Article 27(1)(a) of Directive 92/83/EEC are to be described in the Annex to that Regulation.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 3199/93 [2] določa, da je treba denaturante, ki se uporabljajo v vsaki državi članici za namene popolne denaturacije alkohola v skladu s členom 27(1)(a) Direktive 92/83/EGS opisati v Prilogi k navedeni uredbi.
Pursuant to Article 27(1)(a) of Directive 92/83/EEC, Member States are required to exempt from excise duty alcohol which has been completely denatured in accordance with the requirements of any Member State, provided that such requirements have been duly notified and accepted in accordance with the conditions laid down in paragraphs 3 and 4 of that Article.
V skladu s členom 27(1)(a) Direktive 92/83/EGS morajo države članice alkohol, ki je bil popolnoma denaturiran v skladu z zahtevami katere koli države članice, oprostiti plačila trošarin, pod pogojem, da je v skladu s pogoji iz odstavkov 3 in 4 navedenega člena o teh zahtevah izdano uradno obvestilo in da so odobrene.
Bulgaria and Romania have communicated the denaturants which they intend to employ.
Bolgarija in Romunija sta sporočili denaturante, ki jih nameravata uporabljati.
The Commission transmitted the said communications to the other Member States on 1 January 2007, in the case of Bulgaria, and on 9 January 2007, in the case of Romania.
Komisija je omenjena sporočila Bolgarije posredovala ostalim državam članicam 1. januarja 2007, sporočila Romunije pa 9. januarja 2007.
Objections have been received concerning the requirements notified.
V zvezi s sporočenimi zahtevami so bili prejeti ugovori.
Therefore, the procedure referred to in Article 27(4) of Directive 92/83/EEC has been duly followed and the requirements communicated by Bulgaria and Romania should be included in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 3199/93.
Zato je bil ustrezno upoštevan postopek iz člena 27(4) Direktive 92/83/EGS, zahteve, ki sta jih sporočili Bolgarija in Romunija, pa je treba vključiti v Prilogo k Uredbi (ES) št. 3199/93.
Regulation (EC) No 3199/93 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 3199/93 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Excise Duties,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za trošarine –
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2023/2005 (OJ L 326, 13.12.2005, p. 8).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 2023/2005 (UL L 326, 13.12.2005, str. 8).
For complete denaturing of ethyl alcohol the following substances in the mentioned quantities are to be added together to 100 litres of ethyl alcohol with a minimum actual alcohol content of 90 % vol:
Za popolno denaturacijo etilnega alkohola se 100 litrom etilnega alkohola z vsebnostjo dejanskega alkohola najmanj 90 vol. % dodajo naslednje sestavine v navedenih količinah:
5 litres methylethylketone;
5 litrov metiletilketona,
2 litres isopropyl alcohol;
2 litra izopropil alkohola,
0,2 grams methylene blue.
0,2 grama metilen modre.
2 litres methylethylketone (butanone), and
2 litra metiletilketona (butanon) in