natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Hague Programme on strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union, adopted by the European Council on 5 November 2004, underlines that effective prevention and combating of terrorism in full compliance with fundamental rights requires Member States not to confine their activities to maintaining their own security, but to focus also on the security of the Union as a whole.
Haaški program o krepitvi svobode, varnosti in pravice v Evropski uniji, ki ga je sprejel Evropski svet dne 5. novembra 2004 poudarja, da učinkovito preprečevanje terorizma in boj proti njemu ob popolnem upoštevanju temeljnih pravic zahteva od držav članic, da svojih dejavnosti ne omejijo na ohranjanje lastne varnosti, temveč da se osredotočijo tudi na varnost Unije kot celote.
The Council and Commission Action Plan implementing the Hague Programme on strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union [3], recalls that a global response is required to address terrorism and that the expectations that citizens have of the Union cannot be ignored, nor can the Union fail to respond to them.
Akcijski načrt Komisije in Sveta o izvajanju Haaškega programa o krepitvi svobode, varnosti in pravice v Evropski uniji [3] opozarja, da je za spopad s terorizmom potreben svetovni odziv in da ni mogoče spregledati pričakovanj, ki jih imajo državljani do Unije, prav tako si Unija ne more privoščiti, da se ne bi odzvala nanje.
In addition, it states that attention must focus on different aspects of prevention, preparedness and response to further enhance, and where necessary complement, Member States’ capabilities to fight terrorism, concentrating particularly on recruitment, financing, risk analysis, protection of critical infrastructures and consequence management.
Poleg tega navaja, da se je treba usmeriti na različne vidike preprečevanja, pripravljenosti in odzivanja, da bi tako še povečali in po potrebi dopolnili zmogljivosti držav članic za boj proti terorizmu, pri čemer bi se bilo treba usmeriti zlasti na novačenje, financiranje, analizo tveganja, zaščito pomembne infrastrukture in obvladovanje posledic.
This Framework Decision provides for the criminalisation of offences linked to terrorist activities in order to contribute to the more general policy objective of preventing terrorism through reducing the dissemination of those materials which might incite persons to commit terrorist attacks.
Ta okvirni sklep predvideva inkriminacijo kaznivih dejanj, povezanih s terorizmom, da bi tako prispevali k splošnejšemu političnemu cilju preprečevanja terorizma z zmanjšanjem razširjanja gradiv, ki bi lahko spodbudila posameznike k izvrševanju terorističnih napadov.
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1624 (2005) calls upon States to take measures that are necessary and appropriate, and in accordance with their obligations under international law, to prohibit by law incitement to commit terrorist act or acts and to prevent such conduct.
Resolucija Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov 1624 (2005) poziva države članice, da sprejmejo ukrepe, ki so potrebni in ustrezni ter v skladu z njihovimi obveznostmi po mednarodnem pravu, da z zakonom prepovejo spodbujanje k terorističnemu dejanju ali dejanjem in da preprečijo takšno ravnanje.
The report of the Secretary-General of the United Nations ‘Uniting against terrorism: recommendations for a global counter-terrorism strategy’ of 27 April 2006, interprets the above-mentioned Resolution as providing for a basis for the criminalisation of incitement to terrorist acts and recruitment, including through the Internet.
Poročilo generalnega sekretarja Združenih narodov „Združevanje proti terorizmu: priporočila za svetovno protiteroristično strategijo“ z dne 27. aprila 2006 razlaga zgoraj navedeno resolucijo kot podlago za inkriminacijo spodbujanja k terorističnim dejanjem in novačenja, tudi prek interneta.
The United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy of 8 September 2006 mentions that the Member States of the UN resolve to explore ways and means to coordinate efforts at the international and regional level to counter terrorism in all its forms and manifestations on the Internet.
Strategija Združenih narodov za svetovno strategijo proti terorizmu z dne 8. septembra 2006 navaja, da so države članice ZN odločene raziskati načine in sredstva za usklajevanje prizadevanj na mednarodni in regionalni ravni za boj proti terorizmu v vseh njegovih oblikah in pojavnih oblikah na internetu.
The Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism establishes the obligations of States parties thereto to criminalise public provocation to commit a terrorist offence and recruitment and training for terrorism, when committed unlawfully and intentionally.
Konvencija Sveta Evrope o preprečevanju terorizma državam pogodbenicam te konvencije nalaga dolžnost, da inkriminirajo javno spodbujanje k terorističnemu kaznivemu dejanju ter novačenje in usposabljanje za teroristične dejavnosti, če so ta dejanja nezakonita in namerna.
The definition of terrorist offences, including offences linked to terrorist activities, should be further approximated in all Member States, so that it covers public provocation to commit a terrorist offence, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism, when committed intentionally.
Opredelitev terorističnih kaznivih dejanj, vključno s kaznivimi dejanji, povezanimi s terorističnimi dejavnostmi, bi bilo treba dodatno približati v vseh državah članicah, tako bi zajemala javno spodbujanje k terorističnemu kaznivemu dejanju, novačenje in usposabljanje za teroristične dejavnosti, če je to dejanje namerno.
Penalties should be provided for natural persons having intentionally committed or legal persons held liable for public provocation to commit terrorist offences, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism.
Treba bi bilo določiti kazni za fizične osebe, ki so namenoma storile teroristično kaznivo dejanje, ali pravne osebe, ki so odgovorne za javno spodbujanje k terorističnim kaznivim dejanjem, novačenja in usposabljanja za teroristične dejavnosti.
These forms of behaviour should be equally punishable in all Member States irrespective of whether they are committed through the Internet or not.
Takšne oblike ravnanja bi morale biti enako kaznive v vseh državah članicah, ne glede na to, ali so bila dejanja storjena prek interneta ali ne.
Given that the objectives of this Framework Decision cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States unilaterally, and can therefore, because of the need for European-wide harmonised rules, be better achieved at the level of the Union, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, as set out in Article 5 of the EC Treaty and referred to in Article 2 of the EU Treaty.
Ker ciljev tega okvirnega sklepa države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker se ta cilj, zaradi potrebe po vseevropskih usklajenih pravilih, lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski skupnosti in člena 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in Article 5 of the EC Treaty, this Framework Decision does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski skupnosti, ta okvirni sklep ne prekoračuje okvirov, ki so potrebni za doseganje navedenih ciljev.
The Union observes the principles recognised by Article 6(2) of the EU Treaty and reflected in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably Chapters II and VI thereof.
Unija spoštuje načela, ki jih priznava člen 6(2) Pogodbe EU in ki se odražajo v Listini o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije, zlasti v poglavjih II in VI Listine.
Nothing in this Framework Decision may be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict fundamental rights or freedoms such as freedom of expression, assembly, or of association, the right to respect for private and family life, including the right to respect of the confidentiality of correspondence.
Ničesar v tem okvirnem sklepu ni mogoče razlagati, kot da je namenjeno zmanjšanju ali omejevanju temeljnih pravic ali svoboščin, kot so svoboda izražanja misli, zbiranja ali združevanja, pravica do spoštovanja zasebnega in družinskega življenja, vključno s pravico do spoštovanja zaupnosti korespondence.
Public provocation to commit terrorist offences, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism are intentional crimes.
Javno spodbujanje k terorističnim kaznivim dejanjem, novačenje in usposabljanje za teroristične dejavnosti so namerna kazniva dejanja.
Therefore, nothing in this Framework Decision may be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict the dissemination of information for scientific, academic or reporting purposes.
Zato ni mogoče ničesar v tem okvirnem sklepu razlagati, kot da je namenjeno zmanjšanju ali omejevanju razširjanja informacij za znanstvene, akademske ali poročevalske namene.
The expression of radical, polemic or controversial views in the public debate on sensitive political questions, including terrorism, falls outside the scope of this Framework Decision and, in particular, of the definition of public provocation to commit terrorist offences.
Izražanje radikalnih, polemičnih ali spornih stališč v javnih razpravah o občutljivih političnih vprašanjih, vključno s terorizmom, ne spada v področje uporabe tega okvirnega sklepa in zlasti ne v opredelitev javnega spodbujanja k terorističnim kaznivim dejanjem.
The implementation of the criminalisation under this Framework Decision should be proportional to the nature and circumstances of the offence, with respect to the legitimate aims pursued and to their necessity in a democratic society, and should exclude any form of arbitrariness or discrimination,
Izvajanje kaznivosti v skladu s tem okvirnim sklepom bi moralo biti glede na zakonite cilje in nujen obstoj tovrstnih ciljev v demokratični družbi sorazmerno z vrsto kaznivega dejanja in okoliščinami, v katerih je bilo to storjeno, in bi moralo izključevati vse oblike arbitrarnosti ali diskriminatornega obravnavanja –
Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA shall be amended as follows:
Okvirni sklep 2002/475/PNZ se spremeni:
Offences linked to terrorist activities
Kazniva dejanja, povezana s terorističnimi dejavnostmi
“public provocation to commit a terrorist offence” shall mean the distribution, or otherwise making available, of a message to the public, with the intent to incite the commission of one of the offences listed in Article 1(1)(a) to (h), where such conduct, whether or not directly advocating terrorist offences, causes a danger that one or more such offences may be committed;
‚javno spodbujanje k terorističnemu kaznivemu dejanju‘ pomeni razširjanje, ali dajanje na voljo na kak drug način, sporočila javnosti z namenom spodbujanja h kateremu od kaznivih dejanj, navedenih v členu 1(1)(a) do (h), pri čemer takšno ravnanje, naj se neposredno zavzema za teroristična kazniva dejanja ali ne, povzroča nevarnost za storitev enega ali več takšnih kaznivih dejanj;
“recruitment for terrorism” shall mean soliciting another person to commit one of the offences listed in Article 1(1)(a) to (h), or in Article 2(2);
‚novačenje za teroristične dejavnosti‘ pomeni nagovarjanje druge osebe, naj stori enega od kaznivih dejanj, naštetih v členu 1(1)(a) do (h) ali v členu 2(2);
“training for terrorism” shall mean providing instruction in the making or use of explosives, firearms or other weapons or noxious or hazardous substances, or in other specific methods or techniques, for the purpose of committing one of the offences listed in Article 1(1)(a) to (h), knowing that the skills provided are intended to be used for this purpose.
‚usposabljanje za teroristične dejavnosti‘ pomeni zagotavljanje navodil glede izdelave ali uporabe razstreliv, strelnega ali drugega orožja ali zdravju škodljive ali nevarne snovi oziroma glede drugih posebnih metod ali tehnik za namen storitve enega od kaznivih dejanj, naštetih v členu 1(1)(a) do (h), ob zavedanju, da so ta pridobljena znanja namenjena uporabi v teroristične namene.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that offences linked to terrorist activities include the following intentional acts:
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe, da zagotovi, da kazniva dejanja, povezana s terorizmom, vključujejo naslednja namerna dejanja:
public provocation to commit a terrorist offence;
javno spodbujanje k terorističnemu kaznivemu dejanju;
recruitment for terrorism;
novačenje za teroristične dejavnosti;
training for terrorism;
usposabljanje za teroristične dejavnosti;
aggravated theft with a view to committing one of the offences listed in Article 1(1);
velike tatvine s ciljem, da se izvrši eno od kaznivih dejanj, naštetih v členu 1(1);
extortion with a view to the perpetration of one of the offences listed in Article 1(1);
izsiljevanje s ciljem, da se zakrivi eno od kaznivih dejanj, naštetih v členu 1(1);
drawing up false administrative documents with a view to committing one of the offences listed in Article 1(1)(a) to (h) and Article 2(2)(b).
izdelava lažnih upravnih dokumentov s ciljem, da se izvrši eno od kaznivih dejanj, naštetih v členu 1(1)(a) do (h) in členu 2(2)(b).
For an act as set out in paragraph 2 to be punishable, it shall not be necessary that a terrorist offence be actually committed.’
Da dejanje iz odstavka 2 postane kaznivo, ni nujno, da se teroristično kaznivo dejanje dejansko stori.“
Aiding or abetting, inciting and attempting
Pomoč oziroma podpora, spodbujanje in poskus
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that aiding or abetting an offence referred to in Article 1(1), Articles 2 or 3 is made punishable.
Vsaka država članica sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe, da zagotovi, da sta pomoč ali podpora kaznivemu dejanju, na katerega se nanašajo člen 1(1), člen 2 ali 3, kaznivi.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that inciting an offence referred to in Article 1(1), Article 2 or Article 3(2)(d) to (f) is made punishable.
Vsaka država članica sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe, da zagotovi, da je spodbujanje h kaznivemu dejanju, na katerega se nanašajo člen 1(1), člen 2 ali člen 3(2)(d) do (f), kaznivo.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that attempting to commit an offence referred to in Article 1(1) and Article 3(2)(d) to (f), with the exception of possession as provided for in Article 1(1)(f) and the offence referred to in Article 1(1)(i), is made punishable.
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe, da zagotovi, da je poskus storitve kaznivega dejanja, na katerega se nanašata člen 1(1) in člen 3(2)(d) do (f), razen posedovanja, na katerega se nanaša člen 1(1)(f), in kaznivega dejanja iz člena 1(1)(i), kazniv.
Each Member State may decide to take the necessary measures to ensure that attempting to commit an offence referred to in Article 3(2)(b) and (c) is made punishable.’
Vsaka država članica lahko sklene, da bo sprejela potrebne ukrepe in zagotovila, da je poskus storitve kaznivega dejanja, na katerega se nanaša člen 3(2)(b) in (c), kazniv.“
Fundamental principles relating to freedom of expression
Temeljna načela v zvezi s svobodo izražanja
This Framework Decision shall not have the effect of requiring Member States to take measures in contradiction of fundamental principles relating to freedom of expression, in particular freedom of the press and the freedom of expression in other media as they result from constitutional traditions or rules governing the rights and responsibilities of, and the procedural guarantees for, the press or other media where these rules relate to the determination or limitation of liability.
Ta okvirni sklep od držav članic ne sme zahtevati, da sprejmejo ukrepe, ki so v nasprotju s temeljnimi načeli v zvezi s svobodo izražanja, zlasti svobodo tiska in svobodo izražanja v drugih medijih, kakor izhajajo iz ustavnih tradicij, ali s pravili, ki urejajo pravice in odgovornosti tiska ali drugih medijev in postopkovna jamstva zanje, kadar so ta pravila povezana z določitvijo ali omejitvijo odgovornosti.
Implementation and report
Izvajanje in poročilo
Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with this Framework Decision by 9 December 2010.
Države članice sprejmejo vse ukrepe, potrebne za uskladitev s tem okvirnim sklepom, do 9. decembra 2010.
In the implementation of this Framework Decision, Member States shall ensure that the criminalisation shall be proportionate to the legitimate aims pursued and necessary in a democratic society and shall exclude any form of arbitrariness and discrimination.
Države članice zagotovijo, da je pri izvajanju tega okvirnega sklepa kaznivost sorazmerna glede na zakonite cilje in nujen obstoj tovrstnih ciljev v demokratični družbi ter da je izključena vsakršna oblika arbitrarnosti in diskriminacije.
By 9 December 2010, Member States shall forward to the General Secretariat of the Council and to the Commission the text of the provisions transposing into their national law the obligations imposed on them under this Framework Decision.
Države članice pošljejo do 9. decembra 2010 generalnemu sekretariatu Sveta in Komisiji besedila vseh določb, s katerimi se v njihovo nacionalno pravo prenašajo obveznosti, ki so jim naložene po tem okvirnem sklepu.
On the basis of a report drawn up from that information and a report from the Commission, the Council shall assess, by 9 December 2011, whether Member States have taken the necessary measures to comply with this Framework Decision.
Na podlagi poročila, izdelanega na podlagi teh podatkov, in poročila Komisije bo Svet do 9. decembra 2011 ocenil, ali so države članice sprejele vse potrebne ukrepe za uskladitev s tem okvirnim sklepom.
Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2008/947/PNZ
on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments and probation decisions with a view to the supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions
o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja sodb in pogojnih odločb zaradi zagotavljanja nadzorstva nad spremljevalnimi ukrepi in alternativnimi sankcijami
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(1)(a) and (c) and Article 34(2)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti člena 31(1)(a) in (c) ter člena 34(2)(b) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the initiative of the Federal Republic of Germany and of the French Republic [1],
ob upoštevanju pobude Zvezne republike Nemčije in Francoske republike [1],
Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament [2],
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega parlamenta [2],
The European Union has set itself the objective of developing an area of freedom, security and justice.
Evropska unija si je zadala cilj razvijati območje svobode, varnosti in pravice.
This presupposes that there is an understanding of freedom, security and justice on the part of the Member States which is identical in its essential elements and based on the principles of freedom, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, as well as the rule of law.
Predpogoj za to je enako pojmovanje osnovnih elementov svobode, varnosti in pravice v vseh državah članicah, ki temelji na načelih svobode, demokracije, spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter pravne države.
The aim of police and judicial cooperation in the European Union is to provide a high degree of security for all citizens.
Cilj policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v Evropski uniji je zagotavljanje visoke stopnje varnosti za vse državljane.
One of the cornerstones for this is the principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions, established in the conclusions of the European Council meeting in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999 and reaffirmed in the Hague Programme of 4 and 5 November 2004 for strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union [3].
Eden od temeljev za to je načelo vzajemnega priznavanja sodnih odločb, vzpostavljeno s sklepi Evropskega sveta iz Tampereja z dne 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 in potrjeno v Haaškem programu z dne 4. in 5. novembra 2004 za krepitev svobode, varnosti in pravice v Evropski uniji [3].
In the programme of measures of 29 November 2000 adopted for the purpose of implementing the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters, the Council pronounced itself in favour of cooperation in the area of suspended sentences and parole.
V programu ukrepov z dne 29. novembra 2000, sprejetem za izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja sodnih odločb v kazenskih zadevah, se je Svet zavzel za sodelovanje na področju pogojnih obsodb in pogojnega odpusta.
Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union [4] concerns the mutual recognition and enforcement of custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty.
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2008/909/PNZ z dne 27. novembra 2008 o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja sodb v kazenskih zadevah, s katerimi so izrečene kazni zapora ali ukrepi, ki vključujejo odvzem prostosti, za namen njihovega izvrševanja v Evropski uniji [4], zadeva načelo vzajemnega priznavanja in izvrševanje kazni zapora oziroma ukrepe, ki vključujejo odvzem prostosti.
Further common rules are required, in particular where a non-custodial sentence involving the supervision of probation measures or alternative sanctions has been imposed in respect of a person who does not have his lawful and ordinary residence in the State of conviction.
Potrebna so dodatna skupna pravila, predvsem če je bila osebi, ki v državi izreka obsodbe nima svojega zakonitega običajnega prebivališča, izrečena kazen brez odvzema prostosti, ki vključuje nadzorstvo nad spremljevalnimi ukrepi ali alternativnimi sankcijami.
The Council of Europe Convention of 30 November 1964 on the Supervision of Conditionally Sentenced or Conditionally Released Offenders has been ratified by only 12 Member States, with, in some cases, numerous reservations.
Konvencijo Sveta Evrope z dne 30. novembra 1964 o nadzorstvu nad pogojno obsojenimi ali pogojno oproščenimi osebami je ratificiralo le 12 držav članic, v nekaterih primerih s številnimi pridržki.
The present Framework Decision provides for a more effective instrument because it is based on the principle of mutual recognition and all Member States participate.
Ta okvirni sklep predstavlja učinkovitejši instrument, saj temelji na načelu vzajemnega priznavanja, v njem pa sodelujejo vse države članice.
This Framework Decision respects fundamental rights and adheres to the principles recognised in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union, which are also expressed in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, especially in Chapter VI thereof.
Ta okvirni sklep spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, ki so priznana s členom 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in izražena v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti v poglavju VI Listine.
No provision of this Framework Decision should be interpreted as prohibiting refusal to recognise a judgment and/or supervise a probation measure or alternative sanction if there are objective reasons to believe that the probation measure or alternative sanction was imposed to punish a person because of his or her sex, race, religion, ethnic origin, nationality, language, political opinions or sexual orientation or that this person might be disadvantaged for one of these reasons.
Nobena določba tega okvirnega sklepa se ne sme razlagati kot prepoved zavrnitve priznanja sodbe in/ali nadzorstva nad spremljevalnim ukrepom ali alternativno sankcijo, če obstajajo objektivni razlogi za domnevo, da je bil spremljevalni ukrep ali alternativna sankcija naložena z namenom kaznovanja osebe zaradi njenega spola, rase, vere, etničnega izvora, državljanstva, jezika, političnega prepričanja ali spolne usmerjenosti ali da bi lahko bila oseba zaradi katerega od teh razlogov v slabšem položaju.