natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is therefore provisionally concluded that these products are alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se začasno sklene, da so si ti izdelki podobni v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
The general methodology set out below has been applied to all cooperating exporting producers in the USA and Taiwan, as well as for the cooperating Chinese exporting producers for which MET was granted.
Splošna metodologija, določena v nadaljevanju, se je uporabila za vse sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike v ZDA in Tajvanu ter za kitajske sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim je bil odobren TGO.
The presentation of the findings on dumping for each of the countries concerned therefore only describes matters specific to each exporting country.
Predstavitev ugotovitev glede dampinga za vsako posamezno zadevno državo vsebuje zato samo zadeve, specifične za posamezno državo izvoznico.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first examined for each exporting producer whether the domestic sales of the product concerned to independent customers were representative, i.e. whether the total volume of such sales was equal to or greater than 5 % of the total volume of the corresponding export sales to the Community.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe je Komisija najprej za vsakega posameznega proizvajalca izvoznika proučila, ali je bila domača prodaja zadevnega izdelka neodvisnim strankam reprezentativna, tj. ali je bil celotni obseg take prodaje enak ali večji od 5 % celotnega obsega pripadajočega izvoza v Skupnost.
The Commission subsequently identified those product types sold domestically by the companies having overall representative domestic sales, which were identical or directly comparable with the types sold for export to the Community.
Komisija je nato opredelila tiste vrste izdelka, ki so jih družbe prodajale na domačem trgu in so imele reprezentativno domačo prodajo, ki je bila enaka ali neposredno primerljiva z vrstami, prodanimi za izvoz v Skupnost.
Domestic sales of a particular product type were considered as sufficiently representative when the volume of that product type sold on the domestic market to independent customers during the investigation period represented 5 % or more of the total volume of the comparable product type sold for export to the Community.
Domača prodaja posamezne vrste izdelka se je štela za dovolj reprezentativno, kadar je med obdobjem preiskave obseg navedene vrste izdelka, prodane neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu, predstavljal 5 % ali več celotnega obsega primerljive vrste izdelka, prodane za izvoz v Skupnost.
The Commission subsequently examined whether the domestic sales of each type of persulphates sold domestically in representative quantities by each company in each exporting country could be considered as being made in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je nato proučila, ali bi se za domačo prodajo posamezne vrste persulfatov, ki jih je na domačem trgu v reprezentativnih količinah prodala posamezna družba v posamezni državi izvoznici, lahko štelo, da se izvaja v običajnem poteku trgovine, v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
This was done by establishing the proportion of profitable domestic sales to independent customers, of each exported product type, on the domestic market during the investigation period, as follows:
To je Komisija izvedla tako, da je določila delež dobičkonosne domače prodaje vsake posamezne vrste izvoženega izdelka neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu med obdobjem preiskave.
Where the sales volume of a product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of that type, and where the weighted average price of that type was equal to or above the cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price.
Kadar je obseg prodaje vrste izdelka, prodane po neto prodajni ceni, ki je bila enaka ali višja od izračunanih stroškov proizvodnje, predstavljal več kot 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje navedene vrste in kadar je bila tehtana povprečna cena navedene vrste enaka ali višja od stroškov proizvodnje, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni.
This price was calculated as a weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales of that type made during the IP, irrespective of whether these sales were profitable or not.
Ta cena je bila izračunana kot tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje navedene vrste v OP, ne glede na to, ali je bila ta prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne.
Where the volume of profitable sales of a product type represented 80 % or less of the total sales volume of that type, or where the weighted average price of that type was below the cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price, calculated as a weighted average of profitable sales of that type only, provided that these sales represented 10 % or more of the total sales volume of that type.
Kadar je obseg dobičkonosne prodaje določene vrste izdelka predstavljal 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste ali manj ali kadar je bila tehtana povprečna cena te vrste nižja od stroškov proizvodnje, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtano povprečje dobičkonosne prodaje samo navedene vrste, če je ta prodaja predstavljala 10 % celotnega obsega prodaje navedene vrste ali več.
Wherever domestic prices of a particular product type sold by an exporting producer could not be used in order to establish normal value, another method had to be applied.
Kadar domačih cen določene vrste izdelka, ki jo je prodal proizvajalec izvoznik, ni bilo mogoče uporabiti za določitev normalne vrednosti, je bilo treba uporabiti drugo metodo.
In accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation the Commission instead calculated a constructed normal value, as follows.
Zato je Komisija v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe izračunala konstruirano normalno vrednost, kot je pojasnjeno v nadaljevanju.
Normal value was constructed by adding to each exporter’s manufacturing costs of the exported types, adjusted where necessary, a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) and a reasonable margin of profit.
Normalna vrednost je bila konstruirana tako, da so se po potrebi popravljenim proizvodnim stroškom izvoženih vrst izdelka posameznega izvoznika prišteli razumni zneski za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške (PSA-stroški) in primerna stopnja dobička.
In all cases SG&A and profit were established pursuant to the methods set out in Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation.
V vseh primerih so se PSA-stroški ter dobiček določili v skladu z metodami iz člena 2(6) osnovne uredbe.
To this end, the Commission examined whether the SG&A incurred and the profit realised by each of the exporting producers concerned on the domestic market constituted reliable data.
V ta namen je Komisija proučila, ali nastali PSA-stroški ter dobiček, ki so ga ustvarili posamezni zadevni proizvajalci izvozniki na domačem trgu, predstavljajo zanesljive podatke.
In all cases where the product concerned was exported to independent customers in the Community, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, namely on the basis of export prices actually paid or payable.
V vseh primerih, kjer se je zadevni izdelek izvozil neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti, je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe, in sicer na podlagi izvoznih cen, ki so se dejansko plačale ali se plačujejo.
Where the export sale was made via related importers based in the Community, the export price was constructed, pursuant to Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, on the basis of the price at which the imported products were first resold to an independent buyer, duly adjusted for all costs incurred between importation and resale, as well as a reasonable margin for SG&A and profits.
Kadar je izvoz potekal prek povezanih uvoznikov s sedežem v Skupnosti, je bila izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe konstruirana na podlagi cene, po kateri so bili uvoženi izdelki prvič nadalje prodani neodvisnemu kupcu, pri katerem se je cena ustrezno prilagodila za vse stroške, nastale med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, kakor tudi za razumne zneske za PSA-stroške ter dobičke.
In this regard, the related importers’ own SG&A costs were used.
V zvezi s tem so se uporabili lastni PSA-stroški povezanih uvoznikov.
The profit margin was established on the basis of the information available from cooperating unrelated importers.
Stopnja dobička je bila določena na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij sodelujočih nepovezanih uvoznikov.
Where the export sale was made via a related trader located outside the Community, the export price was established on the basis of the first resale price to independent customers in the Community.
Kadar je izvoz potekal prek povezanega trgovca izven Skupnosti, je bila izvozna cena določena na podlagi cene pri prvi nadaljnji prodaji neodvisni stranki v Skupnosti.
The comparison between normal value and export price was made on an ex-factory basis.
Primerjava med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno je bila izvedena na podlagi cene franko tovarna.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences affecting prices and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi poštene primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno so se v obliki prilagoditev ustrezno upoštevale razlike, ki vplivajo na cene in primerljivost cen v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
As the level of cooperation in the USA and Taiwan was high (effectively 100 %), and since there was no reason to believe that any exporting producer in these countries deliberately abstained from cooperating, it was considered appropriate to set the residual dumping margin for any non-cooperating exporting producers in each of the countries concerned at the level of the highest margin imposed on a cooperating exporter.
Ker je bila raven sodelovanja v ZDA in Tajvanu visoka (v bistvu 100-odstotna) in ker ni bilo razloga za domnevo, da kateri koli proizvajalec izvoznik v teh dveh državah namenoma ni sodeloval v preiskavi, se je zdelo primerno preostalo stopnjo dampinga za vse nesodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike v posamezni zadevni državi določiti v višini najvišje stopnje, uvedene za sodelujočega izvoznika.
As regards the PRC, the level of cooperation assessed at the level of the country was also very high (above 85 %).
Ocenjena raven sodelovanja proizvajalcev iz LRK na ravni države je bila prav tako zelo visoka, in sicer nad 85 %.
The specific methodology applied to determine the countrywide dumping margin for the PRC is explained below.
Posebna metodologija za določitev stopnje dampinga za celotno državo je pojasnjena v nadaljevanju.
For both cooperating exporting producers, the total volume of domestic sales of the like product was representative as defined in recital 21 above.
Za oba proizvajalca izvoznika je bil celoten obseg domače prodaje podobnega izdelka reprezentativen, kot je opredeljeno v uvodni izjavi 21.
For all product types normal value was thus based on prices paid or payable, in the ordinary course of trade, by independent customers in the USA, as explained in recitals 25 and 26, since these sales represented in all cases 10 % or more of the total sales volume of that type.
Torej je za vse vrste izdelkov normalna vrednost temeljila na cenah, ki so jih v običajnem poteku trgovine neodvisne stranke v ZDA plačevale ali jih plačujejo, kakor je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 25 in 26, saj je ta prodaja predstavljala v vseh primerih 10 % ali več celotnega obsega prodaje navedene vrste.
The exports of the one of the cooperating exporting producers were made directly to independent customers in the Community.
En sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik je izvažal neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti.
The export price was therefore based, for that exporter, on the prices actually paid or payable for the product concerned in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Izvozna cena je zato temeljila na cenah, ki so bile za zadevni izdelek dejansko plačane ali se plačujejo v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
For the other exporter, all its sales to the Community are through a related trading company in Switzerland.
Drugi izvoznik pa je vso svojo prodajo v Skupnost izvedel prek povezane trgovinske družbe v Švici.
The export price was therefore established as described in recital 33.
Zato je bila izvozna cena določena tako, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 33.
Furthermore, a significant part of the export sales of this exporting producer in the USA to the Community via its related company in Switzerland were to a related company which used the product concerned as a raw material to produce another product which is not considered to be a like product within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega je bil znatni del izvoza tega ameriškega proizvajalca izvoznika v Skupnost prek povezane družbe v Švici prodan povezani družbi, ki je zadevni izdelek uporabila kot surovino za proizvodnjo drugega izdelka, ki se ne šteje za podoben izdelek v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
Since the prices set for the transactions between the exporting producer and its related company in the Community via their related trading company in Switzerland was found to have been affected by the relationship between the three companies, these prices could not be relied upon to determine an export price for those transactions.
Ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da je na cene, določene za transakcije med proizvajalcem izvoznikom in njegovo povezano družbo v Skupnosti prek njune trgovske družbe v Švici, vplivala povezava med navedenimi tremi družbami, se te cene niso mogle upoštevati pri določitvi izvozne cene za navedene transakcije.
Since furthermore no export price could be constructed based on the resale price of the related company to independent customers, as the product concerned goes under substantial transformation to get the final product manufactured by the related company, all those transactions corresponding to captive use were ignored in the determination of the export price.
Prav tako izvozne cene ni bilo mogoče konstruirati na podlagi cene povezane družbe pri nadaljnji prodaji neodvisnim strankam, ker povezana družba za izdelavo končnega izdelka zadevni izdelek znatno spremeni; zato pri določitvi izvozne cene ni bila upoštevana nobena od navedenih transakcij, ki zadeva lastno uporabo.
Adjustments were made for discounts, rebates, transport, insurance, handling, loading and ancillary costs, packing, credit and import duties.
Prilagoditve so bile izvedene za popuste, rabate, stroške prevoza, zavarovanja, pretovarjanja, manipulativne stroške, stroške nakladanja in tozadevne stroške, stroške pakiranja, kreditov in uvozne dajatve.
For the sales channelled by one exporting producer through its related trader in Switzerland, an adjustment was made in accordance with Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation.
Za prodajo enega proizvajalca izvoznika prek svojega povezanega trgovca v Švici je bila prilagoditev izvedena v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) osnovne uredbe.
The adjustment was based on the markup received by the related trader in Switzerland, but in this calculation the actual profit of the related trader could not be used since the relationship between the exporting producer and the related trader significantly affected transfer prices.
Ta prilagoditev je temeljila na pribitku povezanega trgovca v Švici, vendar pa se pri tem izračunu dejanski dobiček povezanega trgovca ni mogel uporabiti, saj je povezava med proizvajalcem izvoznikom in povezanim trgovcem znatno vplivala na transferne cene.
The markup was thus calculated as the sum of the SG&A expenses borne by the related trading company during the IP and a reasonable margin for profit, which was set at 5 % at this stage, in the absence of any meaningful information from cooperating unrelated companies assuming comparable functions.
Zato in ker sodelujoče nepovezane družbe niso predložile smiselnih in primerljivih informacij, je bil pribitek izračunan kot vsota PSA-stroškov povezane trgovinske družbe v OP in primerne stopnje dobička, ki je bila v tej fazi določena v višini 5 %.
One exporting producer in the USA claimed a level of trade adjustment under Article 2(10)(d) of the basic Regulation on the grounds that certain of its domestic sales were allegedly not comparable to its export sales due to the existence of categories of customers on the domestic market for which different functions are assumed by the exporting producer.
En ameriški proizvajalec izvoznik je zahteval prilagoditev za stopnjo trgovine v skladu s členom 2(10)(d) osnovne uredbe, ker naj del njegove domače prodaje ne bi bil primerljiv z njegovim izvozom, saj naj bi na domačem trgu obstajala kategorija strank, ki naj bi po njegovem mnenju opravljala drugačne funkcije.
However, the investigation established that this claim was unwarranted, insofar as the company did not provide evidence in support of the alleged differences in functions.
Vendar pa je preiskava pokazala, da ta zahteva ni utemeljena, saj družba svojih domnev ni podkrepila z dokazi.
Moreover, the alleged differences in prices between the categories claimed were not found consistent across product types.
Poleg tega ni bilo ugotovljeno, ali obstajajo razlike v ceni med domnevnimi kategorijami strank pri vseh vrstah izdelka.
Since the level of cooperation was high, and there was no reason to believe that any exporting producer deliberately abstained from cooperation, the residual margin applicable to all other exporters in the USA was set at the same level as the one established for the cooperating exporting producer with the highest dumping margin.
Ker je bila stopnja sodelovanja visoka in ker ni bilo razloga za domnevo, da kateri koli proizvajalec izvoznik namenoma ni sodeloval, je bila preostala stopnja, ki se uporablja za vse druge izvoznike v ZDA, določena na isti ravni kot stopnja, ugotovljena za sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika z najvišjo stopnjo dampinga.
The dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the cif import price at the Community border, duty unpaid, are provisionally the following:
Stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek uvozne cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, so začasno naslednje:
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of the said Article for those producers which are found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe se v protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz LRK normalna vrednost določi v skladu z odstavki 1 do 6 navedenega člena za tiste proizvajalce, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
Briefly, and for ease of reference only, the MET criteria are set out in summarised form below:
Merila za TGO so na kratko in samo zaradi lažjega sklicevanja povzeta v nadaljevanju:
Business decisions and costs are made in response to market signals and without significant State interference and costs of major inputs substantially reflect market values;
poslovne odločitve se sprejemajo v skladu s tržnimi razmerami, brez občutnega državnega poseganja, stroški večjih vlaganj v glavnem odražajo tržne vrednosti;
Firms have one clear set of basic accounting records which are independently audited, in line with international accounting standards (IAS) and are applied for all purposes;
podjetja imajo jasen seznam osnovnih računovodskih evidenc, ki se neodvisno pregledujejo v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi (MRS) in se uporabljajo za vse namene;
Bankruptcy and property laws guarantee legal certainty and stability; and
stečajno pravo in pravo lastninskih razmerij zagotavljata pravno varnost in stabilnost ter
Six exporting producers requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation and replied to the MET claim form for exporting producers within the given deadline.
Šest proizvajalcev izvoznikov je zahtevalo TGO v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe in v danem roku poslalo izpolnjene obrazce zahtevka za TGO za proizvajalce izvoznike.
The Commission sought and verified at the premises of these companies all information submitted in the MET applications as deemed necessary.
Komisija je v prostorih teh družb poiskala in preverila vse informacije, navedene v njihovih zahtevkih za TGO, za katere je menila, da je to potrebno.
The investigation revealed that the MET could only be granted to three exporting producers, whereas the claim had to be rejected for the other three exporting producers.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se TGO lahko odobri samo trem proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ostalim trem pa je bilo treba zahtevke zavrniti.
It is noted that for one of the three exporting producers granted MET, this decision is subject to further examination of late information that could not be fully investigated at this stage, as described below.
Opozorimo naj, da je treba odločitev v zvezi z enim od treh proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki jim je bil TGO odobren, še proučiti glede na informacije, ki v tej fazi niso mogle biti v celoti pregledane, kot je opisano v nadaljevanju.
This information, if confirmed by the further investigation, could lead to a significant change in the factual situation on the basis of which MET was granted to that company, insofar as it may affect the fulfilment of criterion 1.
Te informacije bi lahko, če bodo potrjene, privedle do znatne spremembe dejanskega stanja, na podlagi katerega je bil navedeni družbi odobren TGO, saj lahko vplivajo na izpolnitev merila 1.
The following table summarises the determination for the three companies for which MET was not granted against each of the five above-mentioned criteria:
V naslednji preglednici je prikazana odločitev glede izpolnitve pet zgoraj navedenih meril treh družb, katerim TGO ni bil odobren:
Not fulfilled
ni izpolnjeno
Fulfilled
izpolnjeno
The investigation showed for companies 1, 2 and 3 above that they did not meet the requirements of the aforementioned criteria 1, 2 and 3.
Za družbe 1, 2, 3 je bilo v preiskavi ugotovljeno, da ne izpolnjujejo zahtev zgoraj navedenih meril 1, 2 in 3.
Namely, all three companies could not demonstrate that their business decisions were taken in response to market signals, without significant State interference.
Nobena od teh namreč družb ni mogla dokazati, da se njihove poslovne odločitve sprejmejo kot odziv na tržne razmere in brez večjega vmešavanja države.
Indeed for company 1 it was found that the majority of the Directors on the Board, including the Chairman, who owns a significant share in the company, were the same as before privatisation and had been appointed by the State.
Za družbo 1 je bilo ugotovljeno, da je večina članov upravnega odbora, vključno s predsednikom, v čigar lasti je znatni delež družbe, istih kot pred privatizacijo in da jih je imenovala država.
They were also found to be members of the Communist Party.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da so bili člani komunistične stranke.
Moreover, the company was unable to prove payment for the shares during the privatisation process.
Poleg tega družba ni mogla dokazati plačila delnic v postopku privatizacije.
In company 2, which was founded as a State-owned enterprise and privatised in 2000, the investigation showed that three members of the management staff that were in post prior to the privatisation conducted the privatisation and still had control over the main decision-making bodies of the company.
Za družbo 2, ki jo je ustanovila država in je bila privatizirana leta 2000, je preiskava pokazala, da so bile tri vodstvene osebe zaposlene že v času pred privatizacijo in so jo tudi izvedle ter še naprej nadzirale organe odločanja v družbi.
Those three persons were found to be members of the Communist Party.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da so bile te tri osebe člani komunistične stranke.