natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
One interested party claimed that the Commission should have initiated this proceeding also against imports originating in India.
Ena zainteresirana stranka je trdila, da bi morala Komisija ta postopek uvesti tudi proti uvozu s poreklom iz Indije.
At the time of the initiation of the current proceeding, however, the Commission did not have sufficient evidence of injurious dumping at its disposal that would have justified the initiation of a proceeding against imports originating in India in line with the requirements of Article 5(2) of the basic Regulation.
Vendar Komisija ob začetku sedanjega postopka ni imela na voljo zadostnih dokazov v zvezi s škodljivim dampingom, ki bi v skladu z zahtevami člena 5(2) osnovne uredbe upravičili začetek postopka proti uvozu s poreklom iz Indije.
The Commission officially advised the complainant, the complainant producers and other known Community producers, exporting producers in the countries concerned, importers/traders and their associations, suppliers and users known to be concerned and the representatives of the exporting countries concerned, of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je pritožnika, proizvajalce pritožnike in druge znane proizvajalce Skupnosti, proizvajalce izvoznike iz zadevnih držav, uvoznike/trgovce in njihova združenja, dobavitelje in uporabnike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter predstavnike zadevnih držav izvoznic uradno obvestila o začetku postopka.
In order to allow exporting producers in the PRC and in Kazakhstan to submit a claim for market economy treatment (MET) or individual treatment (IT), if they so wished, the Commission sent claim forms to the exporting producers known to be concerned as well as to the authorities of the PRC and Kazakhstan.
Da bi proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK in Kazahstan lahko predložili zahtevek za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo („TGO“) ali individualno obravnavo („IO“), če tako želijo, je Komisija proizvajalcem izvoznikom, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter organom LRK in Kazahstana poslala obrazce zahtevka.
Four exporting producer groups in the PRC and one exporting producer in Kazakhstan claimed MET pursuant to Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, or IT should the investigation establish that they did not meet the conditions for MET.
Štiri skupine proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK in en proizvajalec izvoznik v Kazahstanu so zahtevali TGO v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe, ali pa IO, če bi preiskava pokazala, da ne izpolnjujejo pogojev za TGO.
In view of the apparent large number of exporting producers in the PRC and importers in the Community, sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation for the determination of dumping and injury, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi očitno velikega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK in uvoznikov v Skupnosti je bilo za ugotovitev dampinga in škode v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, all exporting producers in the PRC and Community importers were requested to make themselves known to the Commission and to provide, as specified in the notice of initiation, basic information on their activities related to the product concerned during the period of 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, so bili vsi proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK in uvozniki Skupnosti pozvani, naj se od 1. julija 2005 do 30. junija 2006 javijo Komisiji in predložijo, kot je določeno v obvestilu o začetku, osnovne informacije o svojih dejavnostih, povezanih z zadevnim izdelkom.
As far as the exporting producers in the PRC are concerned, given that only four groups of companies having export sales of SiMn to the Community during the IP indicated their willingness to be included in the sample, it was decided that sampling was not necessary.
Pripravljenost za vključitev v vzorec so izrazile samo štiri skupine podjetij, ki so v OP izvažale SiMn v Skupnost, zato je bilo sklenjeno, da vzorčenje proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK ni potrebno.
With regard to importers into the European Community, only two unrelated importers made themselves known and provided the requested information in due time.
Kar zadeva uvoznike v Evropsko skupnost, sta se javila le dva nepovezana uvoznika, ki sta tudi pravočasno predložila zahtevane informacije.
Questionnaire replies were received from four Community producers, four exporting producer groups in the PRC, the sole Kazakh exporting producer, three Ukrainian exporting producers, two unrelated importers and nine unrelated users in the Community.
Vprašalnike so izpolnili štirje proizvajalci Skupnosti, štiri skupine proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK, edini kazahstanski proizvajalec izvoznik, trije ukrajinski proizvajalci izvozniki, dva nepovezana uvoznika in devet nepovezanih uporabnikov v Skupnosti.
In addition, two users submitted comments without replying to the questionnaire.
Poleg tega sta dva uporabnika predložila pripombe, ne da bi izpolnila vprašalnike.
One of the exporting producer groups in the PRC, however, subsequently did not agree to an envisaged on-the-spot verification of the information provided in their MET/IT claims and questionnaire replies.
Vendar se ena od skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK pozneje ni strinjala s predvidenim preverjanjem informacij na kraju samem, navedenih v njihovih zahtevkih za TGO/IO in izpolnjenih vprašalnikih.
Consequently, after having advised the companies concerned of the consequences of non-cooperation as stipulated in Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission has in accordance with the provisions of Article 18 considered the said companies as not cooperating in the proceeding and all submissions made by them have been disregarded.
Zato je Komisija potem, ko je zadevne družbe seznanila o posledicah nesodelovanja, kakor je določeno v členu 18(1) osnovne uredbe, v skladu z določbami člena 18 obravnavala omenjene družbe kot nesodelujoče v postopku in stališča, ki so jih predložile, niso bila upoštevana.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for the purpose of MET/IT, in the case of the PRC and Kazakhstan, and for the determination of dumping, resulting injury and Community interest for all countries concerned.
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za namene TGO/IO v primeru LRK in Kazahstana, in ugotovitev dampinga, škode, ki je zaradi njega nastala, ter interesa Skupnosti za vse zadevne države.
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
V ta namen so bili izvedeni preveritveni obiski v naslednjih družbah:
Eramet Comilog Manganese, Paris, France
Eramet Comilog Manganese, Pariz, Francija
Ferroatlantica S.L., Madrid, Spain
Ferroatlantica S.L., Madrid, Španija
Huta Łaziska SA, Łaziska Górne, Poland
Huta Łaziska SA, Łaziska Górne, Poljska
OFZ, a.s., Istebne, Slovakia.
OFZ, a.s., Istebne, Slovaška
Compañía Española de Laminación, S.L., Castellbisbal, Spain
Compañía Española de Laminación, S.L., Castellbisbal, Španija
Mittal Steel Poland SA (Arcelor SA), Kraków, Poland.
Mittal Steel Poland SA (Arcelor SA), Krakov, Poljska
Metalleghe S.P.A., Brescia, Italy.
Metalleghe S.P.A., Brescia, Italija
Minmetals Orient Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd, Beijing.
Minmetals Orient Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd., Peking
Exporting producer in Kazakhstan
Proizvajalec izvoznik v Kazahstanu
OJSC Kazchrome (Kazchrome), Aktyubinsk and Aksu.
OJSC Kazchrome („Kazchrome“), Aktyubinsk in Aksu
PJSC Nikopol Ferroalloys Plant (NFP), Nikopol and its related traders
PJSC Nikopol Ferroalloys Plant („NFP“), Nikopol in njegovi povezani trgovci
SPIG ‘Interpipe’ Corporation, Dniepopetrovsk
SPIG „Interpipe“ Corporation, Dniepopetrovsk
JSC Stakhanov Ferroalloys Plant (Stakhanov), Stakhanov
JSC Stakhanov Ferroalloys Plant („Stakhanov“), Stakhanov
OJSC Zaporozhye Ferroalloys Plant (Zaporozhye), Zaporozhye.
OJSC Zaporozhye Ferroalloys Plant („Zaporozhye“), Zaporozhye
Related traders in Switzerland
Povezani trgovci v Švici
Steelex SA, Lugano, related to PJSC Nikopol Ferroalloys Plant
Steelex SA, Lugano, povezan s PJSC Nikopol Ferroalloys Plant
ENRC, Kloten, related to OJSC Kazchrome.
ENRC, Kloten, povezan s OJSC Kazchrome
In light of the need to establish a normal value for the exporting producers in the PRC and Kazakhstan to which MET might not be granted, a verification to establish normal value on the basis of data from an analogue country took place at the premises of the following producer and its related sales company in the United States of America (USA):
Ob upoštevanju potrebe po določitvi normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK in Kazahstanu, ki jim TGO morda ne bi bila odobrena, je bila preveritev z namenom določitve normalne vrednosti na podlagi podatkov iz primerljive države opravljena v prostorih naslednje družbe in njenih povezanih prodajnih družb v Združenih državah Amerike („ZDA“):
Eramet Marietta, Inc., Marietta, Ohio (producer)
Eramet Marietta, Inc., Marietta, Ohio (proizvajalec)
Eramet North America, Inc., Coraopolis, Pennsylvania (related sales company).
Eramet North America, Inc., Coraopolis, Pensilvanija (povezana prodajna družba)
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006 (the investigation period or IP).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. julija 2005 do 30. junija 2006 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
The product concerned is silico-manganese (including ferro-silico-manganese) (SiMn) originating in the PRC, Kazakhstan and Ukraine (the product concerned), normally declared under CN codes 72023000 and ex81110011.
Zadevni izdelek je silicij-mangan (vključno s fero-siliko-manganom) („SiMn“) s poreklom iz LRK, Kazahstana in Ukrajine („zadevni izdelek“), običajno uvrščen pod oznakama KN 72023000 in ex81110011.
The product concerned is used in the steel industry for deoxidization and as an alloy.
Zadevni izdelek se uporablja v jeklarstvu za deoksidacijo in kot zlitina.
It is mainly produced from manganese ore and silicon which are mixed together and brought to fusion temperatures in a furnace.
Večinoma se proizvaja iz manganove rude in silicija, ki se zmešata do temperature taljenja v peči.
SiMn exists in different qualities and it can have different contents of iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), silicon (Si) and carbon (C).
SiMn obstaja v različnih kakovostih in ima lahko različno vsebnost železa (Fe), mangana (Mn), silicija (Si) in ogljika (C).
As far as the carbon content is concerned, a distinction can be made between SiMn with a very low content of carbon, which is of a higher quality (and attracts a higher price), and SiMn with higher carbon content, which can be considered as the normal quality.
Kar zadeva vsebnost ogljika, je mogoče razlikovati med SiMn z zelo majhno vsebnostjo ogljika, ki je višje kakovosti (in ima višjo ceno), ter SiMn z višjo vsebnostjo ogljika, za katerega se šteje, da je normalne kakovosti.
SiMn is sold in different powder, grain or lump sizes.
SiMn se prodaja v različnih velikostih v prašku, zrnu ali grudah.
Despite these differences, all qualities and sizes have been considered as a single product since they share the same main chemical and physical characteristics and main uses.
Kljub navedenim razlikam so se vse kakovosti in velikosti obravnavale kot enotni izdelek, ker imajo enake osnovne kemijske in fizikalne lastnosti ter enako osnovno uporabo.
The investigation showed that SiMn produced and sold in the Community by the Community industry, SiMn produced and sold on the domestic markets of PRC, Kazakhstan and Ukraine, and on the domestic market of the USA, which finally served as an analogue country, and SiMn imported into the Community from the PRC, Kazakhstan and Ukraine, have essentially the same basic chemical and physical characteristics and the same basic uses.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo SiMn, ki ga v Skupnosti proizvaja in prodaja industrija Skupnosti, SiMn, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu LRK, Kazahstana in Ukrajine in na domačem trgu ZDA, ki se je uporabila kot primerljiva država, ter SiMn, ki se v Skupnost uvaža iz LRK, Kazahstana in Ukrajine, enake osnovne kemijske in fizikalne lastnosti ter enako osnovno uporabo.
They are therefore considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se šteje, da so enaki v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
One exporting producer claimed that unwrought manganese, normally declared under CN code 81110011, should not be covered by the investigation.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da surovega mangana, običajno uvrščenega pod oznako KN 81110011, preiskava ne sme vključevati.
In this regard, it is confirmed that the product concerned is silico-manganese, as stated at recital 15 and not unwrought manganese, but it also includes unwrought silico-manganese.
V zvezi s tem je bilo potrjeno, da je zadevni izdelek silicij-mangan, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 15, in ne surov mangan, vsebuje pa tudi surov silicij-mangan.
While SiMn is generally declared under CN code 72023000, it may also, depending on the iron content, be declared as unwrought silico-manganese or silico-manganese powders under CN code 81110011.
Medtem ko je SiMn običajno uvrščen pod oznako KN 72023000, je lahko glede na vsebnost železa uvrščen tudi kot surov silicij-mangan ali silicij-manganov prašek pod oznako KN 81110011.
Market Economy Treatment (MET)
Tržnogospodarska obravnava (TGO)
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC and in Kazakhstan, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of the said Article for those producers which have shown that they meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, i.e. where it is demonstrated by such exporting producers that market economy conditions prevail in respect of the manufacture and sale of the like product.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe se v protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz LRK in Kazahstana normalna vrednost določi v skladu z odstavki 1 do 6 navedenega člena za tiste proizvajalce, ki so dokazali, da izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, tj. kjer so takšni proizvajalci izvozniki dokazali, da v zvezi s proizvodnjo in prodajo podobnega izdelka veljajo pogoji tržnega gospodarstva.
Briefly, and for ease of reference only, these criteria are set out in summarised form below:
Ta merila so zaradi večje jasnosti na kratko navedena v strnjeni obliki v nadaljevanju:
business decisions are made in response to market signals, without significant State interference, and costs reflect market values;
poslovne odločitve se sprejemajo v skladu s tržnimi razmerami, brez občutnega vmešavanja države, stroški pa odražajo tržne vrednosti;
firms have one clear set of basic accounting records, which are independently audited in line with international accounting standards and are applied for all purposes;
podjetja imajo jasen seznam osnovnih računovodskih evidenc, ki se neodvisno revidirajo v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi („MRS“) in se uporabljajo za vse namene;
there are no significant distortions carried over from the former non-market-economy system;
ni večjih izkrivljanj, prenesenih iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva;
bankruptcy and property laws guarantee stability and legal certainty;
stečajno pravo in pravo lastninskih razmerij zagotavljata stabilnost in pravno varnost;
exchange rate conversions are carried out at market rates.
pretvorbe menjalnih tečajev se opravljajo po tržnih tečajih.
Four groups of Chinese exporting producers initially requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation and replied to the MET claim form for exporting producers within the given deadlines.
Štiri skupine kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov so zahtevale TGO v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe in so v danih rokih izpolnile obrazec zahtevka za TGO za proizvajalce izvoznike.
However, one of these groups decided subsequently not to cooperate with the investigation (as mentioned in recital 11 above).
Vendar sta se dve od teh skupin pozneje odločili, da v preiskavi ne bosta sodelovali (kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 11 zgoraj).
Thus, only the MET claims of the remaining three cooperating Chinese exporting producer groups listed in recital 12 were considered.
Zato so se proučili samo zahtevki za TGO preostalih treh sodelujočih skupin kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, navedenih v uvodni izjavi 12.
All of these groups included both producers of the product concerned and companies related to the producers and involved in the sales of the product concerned.
Vse te skupine so vključevale proizvajalce zadevnega izdelka ter družbe, povezane s proizvajalci in vključene v prodajo zadevnega izdelka.
Indeed, it is the Commission's consistent practice to examine whether a group of related companies as a whole fulfils the conditions for MET.
Ustaljena praksa Komisije je, da preveri, ali skupina povezanih družb kot celota izpolnjuje pogoje za TGO.
The sole Kazakh exporting producer requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation and replied to the MET claim form for exporting producers within the given deadlines.
Edini kazahstanski proizvajalec izvoznik je zahteval TGO v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe in je v danih rokih izpolnil obrazec zahtevka za TGO za proizvajalce izvoznike.
For the cooperating exporting producers the Commission sought all information deemed necessary and verified the information submitted in the MET claim at the premises of the companies in question as deemed necessary.
Komisija je pridobila vse potrebne informacije o sodelujočih proizvajalcih izvoznikih in informacije, navedene v zahtevku za TGO, za katere je menila, da je to potrebno, preverila v prostorih zadevnih podjetij.
The investigation revealed that MET could not be granted to any of the Chinese exporting producers listed in recital 12 as none of these groups met criterion 1 set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation and, in addition, one of them failed to meet criterion 2 and another one failed to meet criterion 3.
Preiskava je pokazala, da TGO ni mogoče odobriti nobenemu kitajskemu proizvajalcu izvozniku, navedenemu v uvodni izjavi 12, ker nobena od teh skupin ni izpolnila merila 1 iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, poleg tega ena od njih ni izpolnila merila 2, druga pa merila 3.
Furthermore, for the group not meeting criteria 1 and 2 strong doubts remained with regard to criterion 3 and this group, in any case, failed to submit a complete set of MET claim forms and questionnaire replies of its related companies involved in the production and/or trading of the product concerned.
V zvezi s skupino, ki ne izpolnjuje merila 1 in 2, so ostali močni dvomi tudi glede izpolnjevanja merila 3, ta skupina pa tudi ni predložila celotnega sklopa obrazcev zahtevka za TGO in izpolnjenih vprašalnikov svojih povezanih podjetij, vključenih v proizvodnjo in/ali trgovanje zadevnega izdelka.
As far as criterion 1 is concerned, none of the Chinese groups of companies concerned has demonstrated to fulfil this criterion.
Nobena od kitajskih skupin zadevnih družb ni dokazala, da izpolnjuje merilo 1.
All of the groups of companies were found to be ultimately State owned and failed to present evidence that could be considered sufficient to remove doubts of significant State interference in management decisions.
Pri vseh skupinah družb je bilo ugotovljeno, da so navsezadnje v državni lasti, in niso predložile dokazov, ki bi zadostovali za odpravo dvomov glede občutnega vmešavanja države v vodstvene odločitve.
Therefore, it could not be excluded that the companies were under significant State control and interference.
Zato ni bilo mogoče izključiti možnosti, da so družbe pod precejšnjim nadzorom in vplivom države.
For one group of companies, in addition to the non-compliance with criterion 1, it was established that it could not demonstrate that there are no distortions carried over from the former non-market-economy system (criterion 3), given certain uncompensated loan benefits one company in the group had received from its State-owned mother company.
Za eno skupino družb je bilo poleg neizpolnjevanja merila 1 ugotovljeno, da ne more dokazati odsotnosti izkrivljanj, prenesenih iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva (merilo 3), glede na določene koristi posojil brez vračila, ki jih je ena družba prejela od svoje matične družbe v državni lasti.
Furthermore, for another group of companies, in addition to the non-compliance with criterion 1, it was established that it could not demonstrate that there are no distortions carried over from the former non-market-economy system, in particular in view of the existence of barter trade during the investigation period.
Za drugo skupino podjetij je bilo poleg neizpolnjevanja merila 1 ugotovljeno, da ne more dokazati odsotnosti izkrivljanj, prenesenih iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva, zlasti glede obstoja barter poslov med obdobjem preiskave.
This group also failed to demonstrate that the accounts of several of its verified entities were independently audited in accordance with international accounting standards, as the application of sound and basic accounting principles, in particular with regard to depreciation of fixed assets, had been overruled by the parent company and this infringement had been accepted by the companies' auditors.
Ta skupina tudi ni uspela dokazati, da so bili računovodski izkazi več njenih preverjenih enot neodvisno revidirani v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi, saj je matična družba zavrnila uporabo zanesljivih in osnovnih računovodskih načel, zlasti glede porazdelitve amortizacije stalnih sredstev, revizorji družb pa so to kršitev sprejeli.
Moreover, within the same group at least one company which appeared to be involved in trading of the product concerned had submitted neither a MET claim form nor a questionnaire reply, putting in doubt the reliability of the information provided.
Poleg tega v isti skupini vsaj ena družba, ki naj bi bila vključena v trgovino z zadevnim izdelkom, ni poslala niti obrazca za zahtevek za TGO niti izpolnjenega vprašalnika, s čimer je sprožila dvom o zanesljivosti predloženih informacij.
The interested parties were given an opportunity to comment on the above findings.
Zainteresirane stranke so dobile možnost predložiti pripombe na zgornje ugotovitve.
The comments received from two Chinese exporting producer groups did not provide any new evidence that would change the findings regarding the MET determination.
Pripombe, prejete od dveh kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, niso zagotovile nobenih novih dokazil, ki bi spremenila ugotovitve glede določitve TGO.
On the basis of the above, none of the Chinese exporting producer groups of companies have shown that they fulfil all the criteria set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation and, thus, could not be granted MET.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega ni nobena od kitajskih skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov dokazala, da izpolnjuje vsa merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, zato jim TGO ni mogla biti odobrena.
MET determination regarding the sole exporting producer in Kazakhstan
Določitev TGO v zvezi z edinim proizvajalcem izvoznikom v Kazahstanu
The sole Kazakh exporting producer showed that it fulfilled all five criteria set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation and was therefore granted MET.
Edini kazahstanski proizvajalec izvoznik je dokazal, da izpolnjuje vseh pet meril iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, zato mu je bila TGO odobrena.
The exporting producer and the Community industry (see recital 91) were given an opportunity to comment on the MET findings.
Proizvajalcu izvozniku in industriji Skupnosti (glej uvodno izjavo 91) je bila dana možnost, da predložita pripombe glede ugotovitev v zvezi s TGO.
The comments received from the Community industry did not provide any new evidence that would change the findings regarding the MET determination.
Pripombe, ki jih je poslala industrija Skupnosti, niso zagotovile nobenih novih dokazil, ki bi spremenila ugotovitve glede določitve TGO.