natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Only one of these imported silicon from China into Korea, but did not export it to the Community.
Ena od njiju je uvažala silicij v Korejo, vendar ga ni izvažala v Skupnost.
The second cooperating Korean company neither produced nor imported silicon at all.
Druga sodelujoča družba pa silicija niti ne proizvaja niti uvaža.
The investigation period covered the period from 1 April 2005 to 31 March 2006 (the IP).
Obdobje preiskave je zajelo obdobje od 1. aprila 2005 do 31. marca 2006 („OP“).
Data was collected from 2001 up to the end of the IP to investigate the alleged change in the pattern of trade.
Podatki so se zbirali od leta 2001 do konca OP, da bi se preiskala domnevna sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja.
As mentioned in recital 10, no producers/exporters of silicon in China cooperated in the investigation nor did any Community importer submit information relevant for the investigation.
Kakor je bilo navedeno zgoraj v uvodni izjavi 10, v preiskavi ni sodeloval noben proizvajalec/izvoznik silicija na Kitajskem in noben uvoznik v Skupnosti ni predložil informacij, pomembnih za preiskavo.
As mentioned in recital 11, only two companies in Korea cooperated but they did not export silicon to the Community during the period considered.
Kakor je bilo navedeno zgoraj v uvodni izjavi 11, sta sodelovali samo dve korejski družbi, ki pa v obravnavanem obdobju nista izvažali silicija v Skupnost.
Accordingly, findings in respect of silicon consigned from Korea to the Community had to be made on the basis of the facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bilo treba do ugotovitev o izvozu silicija, poslanega iz Koreje v Skupnost, priti na osnovi razpoložljivih dejstev v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
The product concerned is the same as in the original investigation, i.e. silicon originating in China classifiable within CN code 28046900 (silicon content less than 99,99 % by weight).
Zadevni izdelek je isti kakor v prvotni preiskavi, tj. silicij s poreklom iz Kitajske, uvrščen pod oznako KN 28046900 (ki vsebuje manj od 99,99 mas. % silicija).
It is recalled that silicon with a higher purity, that is containing by weight not less than 99,99 % of silicon, used mostly in the electronic semi-conductor industry, falls under a different CN code and is not covered by this proceeding.
Treba je opozoriti, da je silicij večje čistosti, ki vsebuje več kot 99,99 mas. % silicija in se večinoma uporablja v elektronski industriji polprevodnikov, uvrščen pod drugo oznako KN in ni zajet v tem postopku.
From the information received from the two cooperating Korean companies as well as information available in the request submitted by the applicant, it was concluded that silicon exported to the Community from China and silicon consigned from Korea to the Community have the same basic physical characteristics and the same uses.
Iz informacij, ki sta jih predložili dve sodelujoči korejski družbi, kakor tudi informacij iz zahtevka, ki ga predložil vložnik, je bilo ugotovljeno, da imata silicij izvožen v Skupnost iz Kitajske in silicij, poslan v Skupnost iz Koreje, enake osnovne lastnosti in se uporabljata v iste namene.
Therefore, they are considered as like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe štejeta za podobne izdelke.
As stated above, the change in the pattern of the trade was alleged to stem from transhipment via Korea.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja domnevno izvira iz pretovarjanja preko Koreje.
Due to the absence of cooperation from Korean exporting companies, the volume and value of Korean exports of the product concerned to the Community were determined on the basis of the information available, which in this case was Eurostat import statistics.
Zaradi nesodelovanja korejskih izvoznih družb, sta bila obseg in vrednost korejskega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost določena na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij, v tem primeru statističnih podatkov Eurostata o uvozu.
The change in the pattern of trade is based on data from the first table reproduced below.
Sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja temelji na podlagi podatkov prve preglednice prikazane spodaj.
Large volumes of silicon started to be imported from Korea into the Community in 2002 and 2003, and continued at a high level until the IP.
Uvoz silicija iz Koreje v Skupnost se je v velikem obsegu začel v letih 2002 in 2003, ter se nadaljeval na visoki stopnji do OP.
The significant volumes of imports consigned from Korea between, in particular, 2003 and the IP, while fluctuating during this period, coincided with a substantial and continuing reduction (more than 50 %) of imports from China.
Znaten obseg uvoza, poslanega iz Koreje zlasti med 2003 in OP, je kljub nihanju v tem obdobju, sovpadal z znatnim nadaljevanjem zmanjšanja uvoza (več kot 50 %) iz Kitajske.
Imports of silicon from China and Korea (volume)
Uvoz silicija iz Kitajske in Koreje (obseg)
Circumvention process found and insufficient due cause or economic justification
Ugotovljeni postopek izogibanja in nezadostno upravičen razlog ali gospodarska utemeljitev
Since no Korean company which exported silicon to the EU cooperated in the present investigation, the assessment of circumvention was based on information available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, including information provided in the complaint.
Ker nobena korejska družba, ki je izvažala silicij v EU, ni sodelovala v sedanji preiskavi, je ocena izogibanja v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe temeljila na razpoložljivih informacijah, vključno z informacijami iz zahtevka.
The investigation did not reveal information suggesting that that silicon was produced in Korea.
Preiskava ni razkrila informacij, ki bi kazala na proizvodnjo silicija v Koreji.
On the contrary, both Korean cooperating companies confirmed that no production of silicon exists in Korea.
Nasprotno, obe korejski sodelujoči družbi sta potrdili, da v Koreji proizvodnja silicija ne obstaja.
It is therefore concluded that, in the absence of any other sufficient due cause or economic justification within the meaning of the second sentence of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the change in the pattern of trade stemmed from the anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of silicon originating in China and must be assumed, as the complainant states, to consist in transhipment through Korea.
Ob odsotnosti katerih koli zadostno utemeljenih razlogov ali gospodarske upravičenosti v smislu drugega stavka člena 13(1) osnovne uredbe se zato sklene, da sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja izhaja iz protidampinške dajatve, uvedene na uvoz silicija s poreklom iz Kitajske, in jo domnevno, kot je navedel pritožnik, povzroča pretovarjanje preko Koreje.
It is evident from the data mentioned in recital 18 that a quantitative change in the pattern of Community imports of the product concerned occurred and that Chinese imports into the Community decreased significantly in 2005, while at the same time there was a surge of exports of the product concerned to the Community from Korea, a country where there is no production of silicon.
Iz podatkov iz uvodne izjave 18 je očitno, da je do količinske spremembe v vzorcu uvoza v Skupnost prišlo, in da se je kitajski uvoz v Skupnost po letu 2005 znatno zmanjšal, istočasno pa se je povečal izvoz zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost iz Koreje, države, kjer ni proizvodnje silicija.
It is therefore clear that the marked change in trade flows undermined the remedial effects of the measures in terms of the quantities imported into the Community market even if the imports from Korea during the IP amounted to significantly less than the reduction of imports from China between 2004 and the IP.
Zato je jasno, da je ta izrazita sprememba v trgovinskih tokovih oslabila popravljalne učinke ukrepov glede na količine, uvožene na trg Skupnosti, čeprav je bil uvoz iz Koreje v znatno OP manjši od zmanjšanja uvoza iz Kitajske med letom 2004 in OP.
With regard to prices of silicon consigned from Korea, in the absence of cooperation, it was necessary to refer to Eurostat data.
Glede cen silicija, poslanega iz Koreje, je bilo treba zaradi odsotnosti sodelovanja upoštevati podatke Eurostata.
It was found that the average export prices from Korea to the Community were far below the sale prices and the costs of the Community industry as established in the investigation which led to the imposition of the current measures.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so bile povprečne cene izvoza iz Koreje v Skupnost precej nižje od prodajnih cen in stroškov industrije Skupnosti, določenih v preiskavi, ki je privedla do uvedbe obstoječih ukrepov.
Imports of silicon from China and Korea (EUR per tonne)
Uvoz silicija iz Kitajske in Koreje (EUR na tono)
It is therefore concluded that the imports of the product concerned from Korea undermine the remedial effects of the duty both in terms of quantities and prices.
Zato se sklene, da uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Koreje tako glede cene kot na količino slabi popravljalne učinke dajatve.
Evidence of dumping in relation to the normal value previously established for the like product
Dokazi o dampingu v zvezi z normalno vrednostjo, ki je bila pred tem določena za podobni izdelek
As explained in recitals 10 and 11, given the absence of cooperation and in order to determine whether evidence of dumping could be found with respect to the exports of the product concerned to the Community from Korea during the IP, Eurostat data at CN level were used pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation as the basis for establishing export prices to the EU.
Kakor je razloženo v uvodnih izjavah 10 in 11, so se pri ugotavljanju, ali obstajajo dokazi o dampingu v zvezi z izvozom zadevnega izdelka iz Koreje v Skupnost v OP, zaradi nesodelovanja uporabili podatki Eurostata na ravni oznak KN v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe, in sicer kot podlaga za določitev izvoznih cen v EU.
In accordance with Article 2(11) and 2(12) of the basic Regulation, a comparison of the weighted average normal value as established during the expiry review investigation and the weighted average of export prices during this investigation’s IP, expressed as a percentage of cif price at the Community frontier duty unpaid, confirmed significant dumping.
V skladu s členom 2(11) in 2(12) osnovne uredbe je primerjava tehtanega povprečja normalne vrednosti, določenega s preiskavo zaradi izteka ukrepa, in tehtanega povprečja izvoznih cen v OP te preiskave, izraženega kot odstotek cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, potrdila znaten damping.
In view of the findings above it is found that circumvention has taken place within the meaning of the second sentence of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na zgornje ugotovitve je bilo ugotovljeno, da je prihajalo do izogibanja v smislu drugega stavka člena 13(1) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with the first sentence of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the existing anti-dumping measures on imports of the product concerned originating in China, should be extended to imports of the same product consigned from Korea, whether declared as originating in Korea or not.
V skladu s prvim stavkom člena 13(1) osnovne uredbe je treba obstoječe protidampinške ukrepe za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Kitajske razširiti na uvoz enakega izdelka, poslanega iz Koreje, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Koreje ali ne.
The measures to be extended should be the ones established in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 398/2004, which are a definitive anti-dumping duty of 49 % applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before customs duty.
Razširiti je treba ukrepe, ki so določeni s členom 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 398/2004, in sicer dokončno protidampinško dajatev v višini 49 %, pred plačilom carine, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti.
In accordance with Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, which provides that any extended measure should apply to imports which entered the Community under registration imposed by the initiating Regulation, duties should be collected on those registered imports of silicon consigned from Korea.
V skladu s členom 13(3) in členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe, ki določata, da je treba uporabljati vse razširjene ukrepe za uvoz, ki je vstopil v Skupnost pod registracijo, uvedena z začetno uredbo, je treba pobrati dajatve na registrirani uvoz silicija, poslan iz Koreje.
Although during this investigation no genuine producer/exporter of silicon to the Community was found to exist in Korea or made itself known to the Commission, any exporters concerned which consider lodging a request for an exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty pursuant to Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation will be required to complete a questionnaire in order to enable the Commission to determine whether an exemption may be warranted.
Čeprav v času te preiskave ni bil dokazan obstoj nobenega korejskega proizvajalca/izvoznika silicija v Skupnost, in se noben takšen izvoznik ni javil Komisiji, bodo morali drugi zadevni izvozniki, ki nameravajo predložiti zahtevek za izvzetje od razširjene protidampinške dajatve v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe, izpolniti vprašalnik, da bo Komisija lahko ugotovila, ali je izvzetje utemeljeno.
The request should be addressed to the Commission forthwith, with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company’s activities linked to production and sales.
Zahtevek je treba nemudoma nasloviti na Komisijo, in sicer z vsemi pomembnimi informacijami, zlasti o vsaki spremembi dejavnosti družbe, povezane s proizvodnjo in prodajo.
Where an exemption is warranted, the Commission will, after consultation of the Advisory Committee, propose the amendment of this Regulation accordingly.
Kadar je izvzetje utemeljeno, Komisija po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom predlaga ustrezno spremembo te uredbe.
Subsequently, any exemption granted will be monitored to ensure compliance with the conditions set therein.
Nato se bo vsako odobreno izvzetje spremljalo, da se zagotovi skladnost s pogoji, določenimi v tej uredbi.
Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the Council intended to extend the definitive anti-dumping duty in force and were given the opportunity to comment and to be heard.
Zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je nameraval Svet razširiti veljavno dokončno protidampinško dajatev, bila jim je dana tudi možnost, da podajo svoje pripombe in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
No comments which were of a nature to change the above conclusions were received,
Prejete niso bile nobene pripombe, zaradi katerih bi se spremenili zgornji sklepi –
The definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 398/2004 on imports of silicon falling within CN code 28046900 originating in the People’s Republic of China is hereby extended to imports of silicon, falling within CN code ex28046900 (TARIC code 2804690010), consigned from the Republic of Korea whether declared as originating in the Republic of Korea or not.
Dokončna protidampinška dajatev, uvedena z Uredbo (ES) št. 398/2004 na uvoz silicija, uvrščenega pod oznako ex KN 28046900, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, se razširi na uvoz silicija, uvrščenega pod oznako KN 28046900 (oznaka TARIC 2804690010), poslanega iz Republike Koreje, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot s poreklom iz Republike Koreje ali ne.
The duties extended by paragraph 1 of this Article shall be collected on imports registered in accordance with Article 2 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 607/2006 and Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96.
Dajatve, razširjene z odstavkom 1 tega člena, se poberejo na uvožene izdelke, registrirane v skladu s členom 2 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 607/2006 in členom 13(3) in členom 14(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96.
Fax (32-2) 295 65 05 .
Telefaks (32–2) 295 65 05
In accordance with Article 13(4) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, the Commission, after consulting the Advisory Committee, may authorise by decision the exemption of imports which do not circumvent the anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 398/2004 from the duty extended by Article 1.
V skladu s členom 13(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 lahko Komisija za uvoz, ki se ne izogiba protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim z Uredbo (ES) št. 398/2004, po posvetu s svetovalnim odborom s sklepom odobri izvzetje od dajatve, razširjene s členom 1 te uredbe.
Customs authorities are hereby directed to discontinue the registration of imports, established in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 607/2006.
Carinskim organom se dajo navodila, da prenehajo registracijo uvoza, ki je bila določena v skladu s členom 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 607/2006.
OJ L 198, 28.7.1990, p. 57.
UL L 198, 28.7.1990, str. 57.
OJ L 170, 25.6.1992, p. 1.
UL L 170, 25.6.1992, str. 1.
OJ L 345, 16.12.1997, p. 1.
UL L 345, 16.12.1997, str. 1.
OJ L 107, 20.4.2006, p. 24.
UL L 107, 20.4.2006, str. 24.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 43/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 43/2007
of 18 January 2007
z dne 18. januarja 2007
This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 January 2007.
Ta uredba začne veljati 19. januarja 2007.
Done at Brussels, 18 January 2007.
V Bruslju, 18. januarja 2007
to Commission Regulation of 18 January 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 18. januarja 2007 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 44/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 44/2007
On the basis of information on export licence applications available to the Commission on 17 January 2007, the quantity still available for the period until 15 March 2007, for destination zones (1) Africa, (3) Eastern Europe and (4) Western Europe, referred to in Article 9(5) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2001, could be exceeded unless the issue of export licences with advance fixing of the refund is restricted.
Na podlagi informacij o zahtevkih za izvozna dovoljenja, s katerimi je Komisija razpolagala na dan 17. januarja 2007, bi lahko bila količina, razpoložljiva v obdobju do 15. marca 2007, za namembna območja (1) Afrika, (3) Vzhodna Evropa in (4) Zahodna Evropa iz člena 9(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 883/2001, izčrpana, če se izdaja izvoznih dovoljenj z vnaprejšnjo določitvijo nadomestila ne omeji.
Therefore, a single percentage for the acceptance of applications submitted on 16 January 2007 should be applied and the submission of applications and the issue of licences suspended for this zone until 16 March 2007,
Zato je potrebno uporabljati enoten odstotek za sprejem zahtevkov, vloženih 16. januarja 2007, in ustaviti predložitev zahtevkov ter izdajo dovoljenj za to območje do 16. marca 2007 –
Export licences with advance fixing of the refund for wine-sector products for which applications are submitted on 16 January 2007 under Regulation (EC) No 883/2001 shall be issued in concurrence with 38,30 % of the quantities requested for zone (1) Africa, in concurence with 53,66 % of the quantities requested for zone (3) Eastern Europe and in concurence with 34,57 % of the quantities requested for zone (4) Western Europe.
Izvozna dovoljenja z vnaprejšnjo določitvijo nadomestila za proizvode vinskega sektorja, za katera so bili zahtevki vloženi 16. januarja 2007 v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 883/2001, se izdajo sočasno z 38,30 % količin zahtevanih za območja (1) Afrika, sočasno z 53,66 % količin, zahtevanih za območje (3) Vzhodna Evropa in sočasno z 34,57 % količin, zahtevanih za območje (4) Zahodna Evropa.
The issue of export licences for wine-sector products referred to in paragraph 1 for which applications are submitted from 17 January 2007 and the submission of export licence applications from 19 January 2007 for destination zone (1) Africa, (3) Eastern Europe and (4) Western Europe shall be suspended until 16 March 2007.
Izdaja izvoznih dovoljenj za proizvode vinskega sektorja iz odstavka 1, za katera se zahtevki vložijo od 17. januarja 2007, ter vlaganje zahtevkov za izvozna dovoljenja od 19. januarja 2007 za namembna območja (1) Afrika, (3) Vzhodna Evropa in (4) Zahodna Evropa, se ustavita do 16. marca 2007.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 45/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 45/2007
of 19 January 2007
z dne 19. januarja 2007
This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 January 2007.
Ta uredba začne veljati 20. januarja 2007.
Done at Brussels, 19 January 2007.
V Bruslju, 19. januarja 2007
to Commission Regulation of 19 January 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 19. januarja 2007 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 46/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 46/2007
fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to applications for import licences lodged 16 January 2007 under the Community tariff quota for manioc starch opened by Regulation (EC) No 2402/96
o določitvi koeficienta dodelitve, ki se uporabi za zahtevke za izdajo uvoznih dovoljenj, vložene od 16. januarja 2007 v okviru tarifne kvote Skupnosti, odprte z Uredbo (ES) št. 2402/96 za škrob iz manioke
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2402/96 [3] has opened an annual import tariff quota of 10000 tonnes and an additional autonomous annual tariff quota of 500 tonnes of manioc starch (order number 09.4064).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2402/96 [3] odpira letno tarifno kvoto za uvoz 10000 ton in dodatna avtonomna letna tarifna kvota za uvoz 500 ton škroba iz manioke (zaporedna številka 09.4064).
Based on the notification made under Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 2402/96, the applications lodged on 16 January 2007 until 13.00 (Brussels time) in accordance with Article 9 of that Regulation, relate to quantities in excess of those available.
Iz sporočila, sestavljenega v skladu s členom 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 2402/96 je razvidno, da zahtevki, ki so bili v skladu s členom 9 navedene uredbe vloženi od 16. januarja 2007 do 13h po bruseljskem času, presegajo razpoložljivo količino.
Import licences should no longer be issued under Regulation (EC) No 2402/96 for the current quota period,
Prav tako je treba zaustaviti izdajo uvoznih dovoljenj po Uredbi (ES) št. 2402/96 za tekočo kvotno tranšo –
Each import licence application for manioc starch under the quota referred to in Regulation (EC) No 2402/96 and lodged on 16 January 2007 until 13.00 (Brussels time) shall give rise to the issue of a licence for the quantities applied for, multiplied by an allocation coefficient of 78,635324 %.
Vsak zahtevek za izdajo uvoznega dovoljenja za škrob iz manioke za kvoto, predvideno v Uredbi (ES) št. 2402/96, vložen od 16. januarja 2007 do 13h po bruseljskem času, daje pravico do izdaje dovoljenja za zahtevane količine, za katere se uporabi koeficient dodelitve 78,635324 %.
The issue of licences for the quantities applied for from 16 January 2007 1 p.m. (Brussels time) is hereby suspended for the current quota year.
Izdaja dovoljenj za količine, zahtevane od 16. januarja 2007 od 13h po bruseljskem času se za tekočo kvotno tranšo zaustavi.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1884/2006 (OJ L 364, 20.12.2006, p. 44).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1884/2006 (UL L 364, 20.12.2006, str. 44).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2007
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 47/2007
amending Regulation (EC) No 34/2007 fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to applications for import licences for bananas originating in the ACP countries for the period to 31 December 2007
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 34/2007 o določitvi koeficienta dodelitve, ki se uporablja za zahtevke za uvozna dovoljenja za banane s poreklom iz držav AKP za obdobje do 31. decembra 2007