natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Approximation of criminal law should lead to combating racist and xenophobic offences more effectively, by promoting a full and effective judicial cooperation between Member States.
Približevanje kazenskih zakonodaj bi moralo voditi do učinkovitejšega boja proti kaznivim dejanjem, povezanim z rasizmom in ksenofobijo, in sicer s spodbujanjem polnega in učinkovitega pravosodnega sodelovanja med državami članicami.
The difficulties which may exist in this field should be taken into account by the Council when reviewing this Framework Decision with a view to considering whether further steps in this area are necessary.
Svet bi moral pri pregledu tega okvirnega sklepa upoštevati morebitne težave s tega področja, da bi ugotovil, ali so potrebni nadaljnji ukrepi na tem področju.
Since the objective of this Framework Decision, namely ensuring that racist and xenophobic offences are sanctioned in all Member States by at least a minimum level of effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States individually, since such rules have to be common and compatible and since this objective can therefore be better achieved at the level of the European Union, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as referred to in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union and as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty establishing the European Community.
Ker države članice posamezno ne morejo v zadovoljivi meri doseči cilja, da se v vseh državah članicah zagotovi za kazniva dejanja rasizma in ksenofobije vsaj najnižja stopnja učinkovitih, sorazmernih in odvračilnih kazni, saj morajo biti pravila skupna in združljiva, in ker je ta cilj lažje doseči na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in kakor je določeno v členu 5 Pogodbe o Evropski skupnosti.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in the latter Article, this Framework Decision does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz slednjega člena ta okvirni sklep ne presega okvirov, ki so potrebni za dosego teh ciljev.
This Framework Decision respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union and by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, in particular Articles 10 and 11 thereof, and reflected in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and notably Chapters II and VI thereof.
Ta okvirni sklep spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, ki jih priznavata člen 6 PEU in Evropska konvencija o človekovih pravicah, zlasti člena 10 in 11 Konvencije, ter ki so izražena v Listini o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije, zlasti v poglavjih II in VI Listine.
Considerations relating to freedom of association and freedom of expression, in particular freedom of the press and freedom of expression in other media have led in many Member States to procedural guarantees and to special rules in national law as to the determination or limitation of liability.
Razmisleki v zvezi s svobodo združevanja in svobodo izražanja, zlasti pa svobodo tiska in svobodo izražanja v drugih medijih, so v mnogih državah članicah vodili do postopkovnih jamstev in posebnih pravil v nacionalni zakonodaji glede določitve ali omejitve odgovornosti.
Joint Action 96/443/JHA should be repealed since, with the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam, Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin [5] and this Framework Decision, it becomes obsolete,
Skupni ukrep 96/443/PNZ bi bilo treba razveljaviti, ker je s sprejetjem Amsterdamske pogodbe, Direktive Sveta 2000/43/ES z dne 29. junija 2000 o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja oseb ne glede na raso ali narodnost [5] in tega okvirnega sklepa postal zastarel –
Offences concerning racism and xenophobia
Kazniva dejanja, povezana z rasizmom in ksenofobijo
Each Member State shall take the measures necessary to ensure that the following intentional conduct is punishable:
Vsaka država članica sprejme ukrepe, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev, da se kaznujejo naslednja namerna dejanja:
publicly inciting to violence or hatred directed against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin;
javno spodbujanje k nasilju ali sovraštvu, usmerjenemu proti skupini ljudi, opredeljeni glede na raso, barvo kože, vero, poreklo ali nacionalno ali etnično pripadnost, ali proti članu te skupine;
the commission of an act referred to in point (a) by public dissemination or distribution of tracts, pictures or other material;
zagrešitev dejanja iz točke (a) z javnim razpošiljanjem ali razdeljevanjem letakov, slik ali drugega gradiva;
publicly condoning, denying or grossly trivialising crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined in Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court, directed against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin when the conduct is carried out in a manner likely to incite to violence or hatred against such a group or a member of such a group;
javno opravičevanje, zanikanje ali grobo zmanjševanje pomena genocida, zločinov proti človeštvu in vojnih zločinov, kakor so opredeljeni v členih 6, 7 in 8 Statuta Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča, ki so usmerjeni proti skupini ljudi, opredeljeni glede na raso, barvo kože, vero, poreklo ali nacionalno ali etnično pripadnost, ali proti članu te skupine, če so dejanja izvršena na način, ki lahko spodbudi nasilje ali sovraštvo proti tej skupini ljudi ali članu te skupine;
publicly condoning, denying or grossly trivialising the crimes defined in Article 6 of the Charter of the International Military Tribunal appended to the London Agreement of 8 August 1945, directed against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin when the conduct is carried out in a manner likely to incite to violence or hatred against such a group or a member of such a group.
javno opravičevanje, zanikanje ali grobo zmanjševanje pomena zločinov, opredeljenih v členu 6 Listine Mednarodnega vojaškega sodišča, ki je dodana Londonskemu sporazumu z dne 8. avgusta 1945, usmerjenih proti skupini ljudi, opredeljeni glede na raso, barvo kože, vero, poreklo ali nacionalno ali etnično pripadnost, ali proti članu te skupine, če so dejanja izvršena na način, ki lahko spodbudi nasilje ali sovraštvo proti tej skupini ljudi ali članu te skupine.
For the purpose of paragraph 1, Member States may choose to punish only conduct which is either carried out in a manner likely to disturb public order or which is threatening, abusive or insulting.
Za namen odstavka 1 se države članice lahko odločijo kaznovati le dejanja, ki so bodisi izvršena na način, ki lahko moti javni red in mir, bodisi so to grožnje, zmerjanje ali žaljenje.
For the purpose of paragraph 1, the reference to religion is intended to cover, at least, conduct which is a pretext for directing acts against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin.
Za namen odstavka 1 naj bi sklic na vero zajel vsaj ravnanje, ki je pretveza za dejanja, usmerjena proti skupini ljudi, opredeljeni glede na raso, barvo kože, poreklo ali nacionalno ali etnično pripadnost, ali proti članu te skupine.
Any Member State may, on adoption of this Framework Decision or later, make a statement that it will make punishable the act of denying or grossly trivialising the crimes referred to in paragraph 1(c) and/or (d) only if the crimes referred to in these paragraphs have been established by a final decision of a national court of this Member State and/or an international court, or by a final decision of an international court only.
Vsaka država članica lahko ob sprejetju tega okvirnega sklepa ali pozneje poda izjavo, da bo kot kaznivo opredelila vsako zanikanje ali grobo zmanjševanje pomena kaznivih dejanj iz odstavka 1(c) in/ali (d) le, če bo nacionalno sodišče te države članice in/ali mednarodno sodišče dokončno priznalo kazniva dejanja iz tega odstavka ali če jih bo dokončno priznalo le mednarodno sodišče.
Instigation, aiding and abetting
Hujskanje, pomoč in podpiranje
Each Member State shall take the measures necessary to ensure that instigating the conduct referred to in Article 1(1)(c) and (d) is punishable.
Vsaka država članica sprejme ukrepe, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev, da sta pomoč pri zagrešitvi dejanj iz člena 1(1)(c) in (d) ter njihovo podpiranje kazniva.
Each Member State shall take the measures necessary to ensure that aiding and abetting in the commission of the conduct referred to in Article 1 is punishable.
Vsaka država članica sprejme ukrepe, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev, da je hujskanje k dejanjem iz člena 1 kaznivo.
Criminal penalties
Kazni
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the conduct referred to in Articles 1 and 2 is punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties.
Vsaka država članica sprejme ukrepe, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev, da so dejanja iz členov 1 in 2 kaznovana z učinkovitimi, sorazmernimi in odvračilnimi kaznimi.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the conduct referred to in Article 1 is punishable by criminal penalties of a maximum of at least between 1 and 3 years of imprisonment.
Vsaka država članica sprejme ukrepe, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev, da so dejanja iz člena 1 kaznovana z najvišjimi zagroženimi kaznimi, najmanj med enim in tremi leti zapora.
Racist and xenophobic motivation
Rasistični in ksenofobični motivi
For offences other than those referred to in Articles 1 and 2, Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that racist and xenophobic motivation is considered an aggravating circumstance, or, alternatively that such motivation may be taken into consideration by the courts in the determination of the penalties.
Za kazniva dejanja, ki niso navedena v členih 1 in 2, države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev, da se rasistični in ksenofobični motivi obravnavajo kot oteževalna okoliščina oziroma da lahko sodišča takšne motive upoštevajo pri izrekanju kazni.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that a legal person can be held liable for the conduct referred to in Articles 1 and 2, committed for its benefit by any person, acting either individually or as part of an organ of the legal person, who has a leading position within the legal person, based on:
Vsaka država članica sprejme ukrepe, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev, da so pravne osebe lahko odgovorne za dejanja iz členov 1 in 2, ki jih v njihovo korist stori katera koli oseba, ki deluje bodisi samostojno ali kot del organa te pravne osebe, njen vodilni položaj znotraj te pravne osebe pa temelji na:
an authority to take decisions on behalf of the legal person; or
pooblastilu za sprejemanje odločitev v imenu pravne osebe; ali
an authority to exercise control within the legal person.
pooblastilu za opravljanje nadzora znotraj pravne osebe.
Apart from the cases provided for in paragraph 1 of this Article, each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that a legal person can be held liable where the lack of supervision or control by a person referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article has made possible the commission of the conduct referred to in Articles 1 and 2 for the benefit of that legal person by a person under its authority.
Poleg že navedenih primerov iz odstavka 1 vsaka država članica sprejme ukrepe, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev, da je pravna oseba lahko odgovorna tudi v primeru, ko sta pomanjkljiv nadzor ali kontrola osebe iz odstavka 1 omogočila, da je njej podrejena oseba v korist te pravne osebe zagrešila dejanja iz členov 1 in 2.
Liability of a legal person under paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article shall not exclude criminal proceedings against natural persons who are perpetrators or accessories in the conduct referred to in Articles 1 and 2.
Odgovornost pravne osebe iz odstavkov 1 in 2 ne izključuje kazenskih postopkov zoper fizične osebe, ki so storilci ali pomagači pri dejanjih iz členov 1 in 2.
‘Legal person’ means any entity having such status under the applicable national law, with the exception of States or other public bodies in the exercise of State authority and public international organisations.
„Pravna oseba“ pomeni vsak pravni subjekt, ki ima tak status po veljavnem nacionalnem pravu, z izjemo držav ali drugih javnih organov, ki izvršujejo javna pooblastila, ter javnih mednarodnih organizacij.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that a legal person held liable pursuant to Article 5(1) is punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties, which shall include criminal or non-criminal fines and may include other penalties, such as:
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev, da se pravno osebo, odgovorno na podlagi člena 5(1), lahko kaznuje z učinkovitimi, sorazmernimi in odvračilnimi kaznimi, ki vključujejo kazenske sankcije ali denarne kazni, vključujejo pa lahko tudi naslednje kazni:
exclusion from entitlement to public benefits or aid;
odvzem pravice do upravičenosti do državnih ugodnosti ali pomoči;
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that a legal person held liable pursuant to Article 5(2) is punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties or measures.
Države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev, da se pravno osebo, odgovorno v skladu s členom 5(2), lahko kaznuje z učinkovitimi, sorazmernimi in odvračilnimi kaznimi ali ukrepi.
Constitutional rules and fundamental principles
Ustavna pravila in temeljna načela
This Framework Decision shall not have the effect of modifying the obligation to respect fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles, including freedom of expression and association, as enshrined in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ta okvirni sklep ne spreminja obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz spoštovanja temeljnih pravic in temeljnih pravnih načel iz člena 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, vključno s svobodo izražanja in združevanja.
This Framework Decision shall not have the effect of requiring Member States to take measures in contradiction to fundamental principles relating to freedom of association and freedom of expression, in particular freedom of the press and the freedom of expression in other media as they result from constitutional traditions or rules governing the rights and responsibilities of, and the procedural guarantees for, the press or other media where these rules relate to the determination or limitation of liability.
Ta okvirni sklep od držav članic ne sme zahtevati, da sprejmejo ukrepe, ki so v nasprotju s temeljnimi načeli v zvezi s svobodo združevanja in svobodo izražanja, zlasti svobodo tiska in svobodo izražanja v drugih medijih, kakor izhajajo iz ustavnih tradicij, ali s pravili, ki urejajo pravice in odgovornosti tiska ali drugih medijev in postopkovna jamstva zanje, kadar so ta pravila povezana z določitvijo ali omejitvijo odgovornosti.
Initiation of investigation or prosecution
Uvedba kazenskega pregona
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that investigations into or prosecution of the conduct referred to in Articles 1 and 2 shall not be dependent on a report or an accusation made by a victim of the conduct, at least in the most serious cases where the conduct has been committed in its territory.
Vsaka država članica sprejme ukrepe, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev, da preiskava ali kazenski pregon dejanj iz členov 1 in 2 nista odvisna od ovadbe ali obtožbe s strani žrtve tega dejanja, vsaj v najbolj resnih primerih, kadar je bilo dejanje storjeno na njenem ozemlju.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to establish its jurisdiction with regard to the conduct referred to in Articles 1 and 2 where the conduct has been committed:
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe za vzpostavitev svoje sodne pristojnosti v zvezi z dejanji iz členov 1 in 2, kadar:
in whole or in part within its territory;
je dejanje storjeno v celoti ali deloma na njenem ozemlju; ali
by one of its nationals; or
je storilec njen državljan; ali
for the benefit of a legal person that has its head office in the territory of that Member State.
je dejanje storjeno v korist pravne osebe, ki ima svoj sedež na ozemlju te države članice.
When establishing jurisdiction in accordance with paragraph 1(a), each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that its jurisdiction extends to cases where the conduct is committed through an information system and:
Pri vzpostavitvi sodne pristojnosti v skladu z odstavkom 1(a) vsaka država članica sprejme ukrepe, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev, da v njeno sodno pristojnost sodijo tudi primeri, ko je dejanje storjeno prek informacijskega sistema in:
the offender commits the conduct when physically present in its territory, whether or not the conduct involves material hosted on an information system in its territory;
storilec stori dejanje, ko je fizično navzoč na njenem ozemlju, ne glede na to, ali dejanje vključuje gradivo, vsebovano v informacijskem sistemu na njenem ozemlju;
the conduct involves material hosted on an information system in its territory, whether or not the offender commits the conduct when physically present in its territory.
dejanje vključuje gradivo, vsebovano v informacijskem sistemu na njenem ozemlju, ne glede na to, ali storilec stori dejanje, ko je fizično navzoč na njenem ozemlju.
A Member State may decide not to apply, or to apply only in specific cases or circumstances, the jurisdiction rule set out in paragraphs 1(b) and (c).
Država članica se lahko odloči, da ne bo uporabila pravila o sodni pristojnosti iz odstavkov 1(b) in (c) oziroma da ga bo uporabila le v posebnih primerih ali okoliščinah.
Implementation and review
Izvajanje
Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with the provisions of this Framework Decision by 28 November 2010.
Države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, potrebne za uskladitev s tem okvirnim sklepom, do 28. novembra 2010.
By the same date Member States shall transmit to the General Secretariat of the Council and to the Commission the text of the provisions transposing into their national law the obligations imposed on them under this Framework Decision.
Države članice pošljejo generalnemu sekretariatu Sveta in Komisiji do istega datuma besedilo vseh določb, ki v njihovo nacionalno zakonodajo prenašajo obveznosti, ki jim jih nalaga ta okvirni sklep.
On the basis of a report established using this information by the Council and a written report from the Commission, the Council shall, by 28 November 2013, assess the extent to which Member States have complied with the provisions of this Framework Decision.
Najpozneje do 28. novembra 2013 Svet na podlagi poročila, sestavljenega na podlagi teh informacij in pisnega poročila Komisije, oceni, ali so države članice sprejele ukrepe, potrebne za uskladitev s tem okvirnim sklepom.
Before 28 November 2013, the Council shall review this Framework Decision.
Svet do 28. novembra 2013 pregleda ta okvirni sklep.
For the preparation of this review, the Council shall ask Member States whether they have experienced difficulties in judicial cooperation with regard to the conduct under Article 1(1).
Zaradi priprave tega pregleda se Svet pri državah članicah pozanima, ali je prišlo do težav pri pravosodnem sodelovanju v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji iz člena 1(1).
In addition, the Council may request Eurojust to submit a report, on whether differences between national legislations have resulted in any problems regarding judicial cooperation between the Member States in this area.
Poleg tega Svet lahko zaprosi Eurojust, naj predloži poročilo o tem, ali so razlike med nacionalnimi zakonodajami povzročile težave pri pravosodnem sodelovanju med državami članicami na tem področju.
Repeal of Joint Action 96/443/JHA
Razveljavitev Skupnega ukrepa 96/443/PNZ
Joint Action 96/443/JHA is hereby repealed.
Skupni ukrep 96/443/PNZ se razveljavi.
Territorial application
Ozemlje uporabe
OJ C 146, 17.5.2001, p. 110.
UL C 146, 17.5.2001, str. 110.
OJ L 185, 24.7.1996, p. 5.
UL L 185, 24.7.1996, str. 5.
Council Framework Decision 2008/919/JHA
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2008/919/PNZ
amending Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism
o spremembi Okvirnega sklepa 2002/475/PNZ o boju proti terorizmu
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29, Article 31(1)(e) and Article 34(2)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti člena 29 in člena 31(1)(e) in člena 34(2)(b) Pogodbe,
Terrorism constitutes one of the most serious violations of the universal values of human dignity, liberty, equality and solidarity, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms on which the European Union is founded.
Terorizem je ena najresnejših groženj za univerzalne vrednote človeškega dostojanstva, svobode, enakosti in solidarnosti, spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, na katerih temelji Evropska unija.
It also represents one of the most serious attacks on democracy and the rule of law, principles which are common to the Member States and on which the European Union is based.
Je tudi eden najhujših napadov na demokracijo in vladavino prava, ki sta skupni vsem državam članicam in na katerih temelji Evropska unija.
Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism [2] is the basis of the counter-terrorist policy of the European Union.
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2002/475/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o boju proti terorizmu [2] je podlaga za protiteroristično politiko Evropske unije.
The achievement of a legal framework common to all Member States, and in particular, of a harmonised definition of terrorist offences, has allowed the counter-terrorism policy of the European Union to develop and expand, subject to the respect of fundamental rights and the rule of law.
Uspešno oblikovanje pravnega okvira, ki je skupen za vse države članice, in zlasti usklajene opredelitve terorističnih kaznivih dejanj je omogočilo razvoj in razširitev protiteroristične politike Evropske unije, ki temelji na spoštovanju temeljnih pravic in vladavini prava.
The terrorist threat has grown and rapidly evolved in recent years, with changes in the modus operandi of terrorist activists and supporters including the replacement of structured and hierarchical groups by semi-autonomous cells loosely tied to each other.
Teroristična grožnja se je v zadnjih letih povečala in naglo razvila, osebe, vpletene v teroristične dejavnosti, in tiste, ki jih pri tem podpirajo, spreminjajo način svojega delovanja, kamor sodi tudi nadomestitev organiziranih in hierarhično urejenih skupin z delno neodvisnimi celicami, ki so ohlapno povezane med seboj.
Such cells inter-link international networks and increasingly rely on the use of new technologies, in particular the Internet.
Takšne celice povezujejo mednarodne mreže in se vse bolj opirajo na uporabo novih tehnologij, zlasti interneta.
The Internet is used to inspire and mobilise local terrorist networks and individuals in Europe and also serves as a source of information on terrorist means and methods, thus functioning as a ‘virtual training camp’.
Internet se uporablja za spodbujanje in mobiliziranje lokalnih terorističnih omrežij in posameznikov v Evropi in je tudi vir informacij o terorističnih sredstvih in metodah, in s tem deluje kot nekakšna „virtualna baza za usposabljanje“.
Activities of public provocation to commit terrorist offences, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism have multiplied at very low cost and risk.
Dejavnosti javnega spodbujanja k terorističnim kaznivim dejanjem, novačenja in usposabljanja za teroristične dejavnosti so se povečale z izredno malo stroškov in tveganja.