natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
By letter of 13 November 2007 the Commission pointed this out to the Danish Government.
Komisija je s pismom z dne 13. novembra 2007 na to opozorila dansko vlado.
By letter of 21 November 2007, which reached the Commission on 23 November 2007, the Permanent Representation of the Kingdom of Denmark to the European Union, notified to the Commission the relevant national provisions.
S pismom z dne 21. novembra 2007, ki ga je Komisija prejela 23. novembra 2007, je Stalno predstavništvo Kraljevine Danske Komisijo obvestilo o ustreznih nacionalnih določbah.
In an additional correspondence of 22 November 2007, which was received by the Commission on 27 November 2007 and which contains a report of the National Food Institute of 30 October 2007, Denmark substantiated its application.
V dodatni korespondenci z dne 22. novembra 2007, ki jo je Komisija prejela 27. novembra 2007 in je vsebovala poročilo državnega inštituta za prehrano, je Danska utemeljila njeno uporabo.
By letter of 21 December 2007 the Commission confirmed that it had received the notification and that the six-month period for its examination under Article 95(6) started on 24 November 2007, the day following the day on which the notification was received.
Komisija je s pismom z dne 21. decembra 2007 potrdila, da je prejela obvestilo in da se je šestmesečno obdobje za preverjanje obvestila po členu 95(6) pričelo 24. novembra 2007, dan po tem, ko je bilo obvestilo prejeto.
By letter of 31 March 2008 Denmark provided data on the consumption of meat products in Denmark.
Danska je s pismom z dne 31. marca 2008 predložila podatke o porabi mesnih izdelkov na Danskem.
By letter of 31 January 2008 the Commission informed the other Member States and the EFTA States on the notification and gave them the opportunity to submit comments thereon within 30 days.
S pismom z dne 31. januarja 2008 je Komisija seznanila druge države članice in države EFTE o obvestilu ter jim dala priložnost, da o zadevi podajo mnenje v roku 30 dni.
The Commission also published a notice regarding the notification in the Official Journal of the European Union [12] in order to inform other interested parties of Denmark's national provisions, as well as the grounds invoked to support the request.
Komisija je objavila tudi obvestilo v zvezi z uradnim obvestilom v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [12], da bi seznanila ostale zainteresirane strani z nacionalnimi določbami Danske kot tudi z razlogi za podporo zahtevi.
The Commission received comments from Estonia, France, Hungary and Norway [13].
Komisija je prejela mnenja iz Estonije, Francije, Madžarske in Norveške [13].
Estonia emphasises that, given the restrictive effect of the Danish legislation on trade, it is essential that the restrictions are scientifically justified,
Estonija poudarja, da je zaradi omejevanja trgovine danske zakonodaje treba te omejitve znanstveno podkrepiti.
France stresses that nitrites are a powerful inhibitor against the proliferation of certain bacteria, including Clostridium botulinum and, therefore, significant in the prevention of food poisoning and that there is no alternative in relation to meat products.
Francija poudarja, da so nitriti močan zaviralec širjenja določenih bakterij, vključno s Clostridium botulinum, in so zato bistvenega pomena pri preprečevanju zastrupitve s hrano ter da pri mesnih izdelkih ni nobene druge možnosti.
In its view, Directive 2006/52/EC is based on the EFSA opinion of 26 November 2003 and limits as much as possible the concentration of nitrosamines while securing the microbiological safety.
Po njenem mnenju Direktiva 2006/52/ES temelji na mnenju EFSE z dne 26. novembra 2003 in čim bolj omejuje koncentracijo nitrozaminov ter obenem zagotavlja mikrobiološko varnost.
As recommended by EFSA, it regulates added amounts.
Po priporočilu EFSE uravnava dodane količine.
It refers to maximum residual values only as an exception and only where it was not possible to lay down maximum added amounts.
Na najvišje dovoljene vsebnosti ostanka se nanaša samo kot na izjemo in samo tam, kjer ni bilo mogoče določiti najvišjih dodanih količin.
A new analysis should be undertaken only once the results of studies in the Member States on the consumption of additives on the basis of the new rules are available.
Novo analizo bi bilo treba izvesti takrat, ko bodo na voljo rezultati raziskav v državah članicah o uporabi dodatkov za živila na podlagi novih pravil.
Hungary, while supporting the decrease in the exposure to nitrites and nitrosamines with all possibly available means, emphasises the need to regulate appropriate nitrite levels for the whole EU, including for traditional cured meat products, which may differ from the Danish meat products and where the addition of higher nitrite levels may be justified.
Madžarska, medtem ko podpira zmanjšanje izpostavljenosti nitritom in nitrozaminom z vsemi mogočimi sredstvi, poudarja potrebo po ureditvi primernih ravni nitritov za celotno EU, vključno s tradicionalnimi soljenimi izdelki, ki se lahko razlikujejo od danskih in kjer je višja raven nitritov upravičena.
It questions Denmark’s claim that the transposition of Directive 2006/2052 could lead to a 2,3 to 2,4-fold increase in nitrite in Denmark, having regard to the fact that manufacturers are obliged to apply less than the maximum permitted amount if they can guarantee the required microbiological safety.
Dvomi o trditvi Danske, da bi lahko prenos Direktive 2006/52 vodil k 2,3 do 2,4-kratnem povečanju nitritov na Danskem, ob upoštevanju dejstva, da so proizvajalci obvezani k uporabi manjše količine od najvišje dovoljene, če lahko zagotovijo zahtevano mikrobiološko varnost.
European culture would grow poorer if traditional cured meat products had to disappear from the market.
Evropska kultura bi bila osiromašena, če bi morali tradicionalni soljeni mesni izdelki izginiti s tržišča.
Norway considers that the Danish measure is justified on grounds of major needs referred to in Article 30.
Norveška meni, da je Danski ukrep utemeljen na podlagi pomembnih potreb iz člena 30.
In its view, the measure is intended to ensure a high level of human health protection based on scientific advice and is not an arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade.
Po njenem mnenju je ukrep namenjen zagotavljanju visoke ravne varovanja zdravja, ki temelji na strokovnosti in ni sredstvo samovoljne diskriminacije ali prikritega omejevanja trgovine.
It contends that the obstacle to the functioning of the internal market created by it is necessary and proportionate.
Trdi, da je ovira za delovanje notranjega trga, ustvarjena zaradi tega, potrebna in sorazmerna.
Norway agrees with Denmark that, in relation to nitrites in meat products, Directive 2006/52/EC does not fully reflect scientific advice in that it does not ensure that the lowest level of nitrites necessary to achieve the desired effect is applied and the application of residual levels in relation to a number of meat products.
Norveška se strinja z Dansko, da v zvezi z nitriti v mesnih izdelkih Direktiva 2006/52/ES strokovnega nasveta ne odraža popolnoma in ne zagotavlja uporabe najnižje ravni nitritov, potrebne za dosego želenega učinka, ter uporabe vsebnosti ostanka v zvezi s številnimi mesnimi izdelki.
REQUEST TO EFSA
ZAHTEVA NA EFSO
By letter of 10 March 2008 the Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Protection requested EFSA to provide a scientific opinion on whether the previous opinions of the SCF of 1990 and 1995 and EFSA of 2003 are still valid in light of the information submitted by Denmark.
S pismom z dne 10. marca 2008 je Generalni direktorat za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov zahteval od EFSE, da zagotovi strokovno mnenje o veljavnosti prejšnjih mnenj Znanstvenega odbora za hrano iz leta 1990 in 1995 ter EFSE iz leta 2003 ob upoštevanju informacij, ki jih je predložila Danska.
In its reply of 28 March 2008 EFSA concluded that the previous opinions of the SCF and EFSA are still valid in light of the information provided by Denmark.
V svojem odgovoru z dne 28. marca 2008 je EFSA ugotovila, da so mnenja Znanstvenega odbora za hrano in EFSE ob upoštevanju informacij, ki jih je priskrbela Danska, še vedno veljavna.
With regard to the effects of nitrites/nitrates on the microbiological safety of meat products EFSA refers to the opinion of its Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards of 26 November 2003.
V zvezi z učinki nitritov/nitratov na mikrobiološko varnost mesnih izdelkov se EFSA sklicuje na mnenje svojega Znanstvenega odbora za biološka tveganja z dne 26. novembra 2003.
In this opinion it was stated that several factors contribute to the safety of meat products (cooking process, salt/concentration, water activity etc. and that the ingoing amount of nitrites is important for microbiological safety, which is why ingoing amounts should be controlled (rather than the residual amount).
V tem mnenju je bilo navedeno, da k varnosti mesnih izdelkov prispevajo različni dejavniki (postopek obdelave, sol/koncentracija, aktivnost vode itd.) in da je dodana količina nitritov pomembna za mikrobiološko varnost, zaradi česar je potrebno nadzorovati dodane količine (namesto količine ostanka).
EFSA also refers to the fact that its Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards agreed with the view of the Scientific Committee for Food (SCF) that 50-100 mg added nitrite per kg of meat products may suffice for many products and in other products, especially those with a low salt content and having a prolonged shelf life, addition of between 50-150 mg/kg nitrite is necessary to inhibit growth of C. botulinum.
EFSA se sklicuje tudi na dejstvo, da se je njen Znanstven odbor za biološka tveganja strinjal z mnenjem Znanstvenega odbora za prehrano, da je 50–100 mg dodanega nitrita na kg mesa dovolj za večino izdelkov in da je pri ostalih izdelkih, posebej tistih z nižjo vsebnostjo soli in podaljšanim rokom uporabnosti, za zaviranje rasti C. botulinum treba dodajati 50–150 mg/kg nitrita.
ADMISSIBILITY
DOPUSTNOST
Under Article 95(4) and (6) of the EC Treaty a Member State may, after the adoption of a harmonisation measure, maintain national provisions on grounds of major needs referred to in Article 30, or relating to the protection of the environment or the working environment, if it notifies these national provisions to the Commission and if the Commission approves the application.
V skladu s členom 95(4) in (6) Pogodbe ES lahko država članica po sprejetju usklajevalnega ukrepa ohrani nacionalne določbe zaradi pomembnih potreb iz člena 30 ali določbe, ki zadevajo varstvo okolja ali delovnega okolja, če te nacionalne določbe posreduje Komisiji in če Komisija odobri uporabo.
The Danish notification relates to national provisions derogating from those of Annex I(3)(c) to Directive 2006/52/EC amending Annex III Part C to Directive 95/2/EC in relation to E249 and E250.
Dansko obvestilo se nanaša na nacionalne določbe, ki izhajajo iz Priloge I(3)(c) k Direktivi 2006/52/ES, ki spreminja del C Priloge III k Direktivi 95/2/ES v zvezi z E 249 in E 250.
The current Danish provisions already existed at the time of the adoption of Directive 2006/52/EC.
Trenutna danska določila so v času sprejetja Direktive 2006/52/ES že obstajala.
Order No 22 and the Danish positive list contain more stringent provisions in relation to the use of nitrites in meat and meat products than Directive 2006/52/EC in that they lay down lower maximum added amounts than Directive 2006/52/EC for several types of products (in many cases 60 mg/kg) and insofar as they do not, unlike Directive 2006/52/EC, allow the placing on the market of certain traditional meat products on the basis of maximum residual values.
Odlok št. 22 in danski pozitivni seznam vsebujeta strožje predpise v zvezi z uporabo nitritov v mesu in mesnih izdelkih kot Direktiva 2006/52/ES, saj določata nižje najvišje dodane količine za več vrst izdelkov (v več primerih 60 mg/kg) in v nasprotju z Direktivo 2006/52/ES ne dovoljujeta dajanje v promet določenih tradicionalnih mesnih izdelkov na osnovi največjih dovoljenih vsebnosti ostanka.
In accordance with Article 95(4), the notification was supplemented by a description of the grounds relating to one or more of the major needs referred to in Article 30 or to the protection of the environment or the working environment, in this case the protection of health and life of humans.
V skladu s členom 95(4) je bilo obvestilo dopolnjeno z opisom razlogov, povezanih z eno ali več pomembnimi potrebami iz člena 30 ali z varstvom okolja ali delovnega okolja, v tem primeru z varovanjem zdravja in življenja ljudi.
The Danish position is explained in more detail in a report of the Danish Food Institute of 30 October 2007, which was submitted on 27 November 2007, as well as in the other documents referred to in points 17 and 19 above.
Dansko stališče je podrobneje razloženo v poročilu Danskega inštituta za prehrano z dne 30. oktobra 2007, ki je bilo predloženo 27. novembra 2007, kot tudi v drugih dokumentih, navedenih v točkah 17 in 19.
In light of the foregoing, the Commission considers that the application submitted by Denmark with a view to obtaining authorisation to maintain its national provisions on the use of nitrites in meat and meat products is admissible under Article 95(4) of the EC Treaty.
Komisija v skladu z navedenim meni, da je zahteva, ki jo je Danska predložila, da bi pridobila dovoljenje za ohranjanje nacionalnih določb o rabi nitritov v mesu in mesnih izdelkih, dopustna v skladu s členom 95(4) Pogodbe ES.
In accordance with Article 95(4) and (6), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, the Commission must ascertain that all the conditions enabling a Member State to maintain its national provisions derogating from a Community harmonisation measure provided for in that Article are fulfilled.
V skladu s členom 95(4) in prvim pododstavkom člena 95(6) Pogodbe ES mora Komisija zagotoviti, ali so izpolnjene vse zahteve iz navedenega člena, ki državi članici omogočajo ohraniti njene nacionalne določbe, ki odstopajo od usklajevalnega ukrepa Skupnosti.
In particular, the Commission has to assess whether or not the national provisions are justified by the major needs referred to in Article 30 of the EC Treaty or relating to the protection of the environment or the working environment and do not exceed what is necessary to attain the legitimate objective pursued.
Komisija mora zlasti oceniti, ali so nacionalne določbe utemeljene na podlagi pomembnih potreb iz člena 30 Pogodbe ES oziroma ali so povezane z varstvom okolja ali delovnega okolja ter ne presegajo potrebnega, da se doseže zastavljeni legitimni cilj.
In addition, when the Commission considers that the national provisions fulfill the above conditions, it must verify, pursuant to Article 95(6), whether or not the national provisions are a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States and whether or not they constitute an obstacle to the functioning of the internal market.
Poleg tega mora Komisija v skladu s členom 95(6), kadar meni, da nacionalne določbe izpolnjujejo zgoraj navedene zahteve, preveriti, ali so nacionalne določbe sredstvo samovoljne diskriminacije ali prikrita omejitev trgovine med državami članicami in ali ovirajo delovanje notranjega trga.
It has to be noted that, in the light of the time frame established by Article 95(6) of the EC Treaty, the Commission, when examining whether the national measures notified under Article 95(4) of the EC Treaty are justified, has to take as a basis ‘the grounds’ put forward by the notifying Member State.
Treba je opozoriti, da mora Komisija v okviru časovnega roka iz člena 95(6) Pogodbe ES pri proučevanju, ali so priglašeni nacionalni ukrepi na podlagi člena 95(4) utemeljeni, upoštevati „razloge“, ki jih je predložila država članica, ki je poslala uradno obvestilo.
This means that, according to the provisions of the Treaty, the responsibility of proving that the national measures are justified lies with the requesting Member State which seeks to maintain them.
To pomeni, da mora v skladu z določbami Pogodbe ES država članica, ki je predložila zahtevo in želi nacionalne ukrepe ohraniti, dokazati, da so ti utemeljeni.
Given the procedural framework established by Article 95 paragraphs 4 and 6 of the EC Treaty, including in particular a strict deadline for a decision to be adopted, the Commission normally has to limit itself to examining the relevance of the elements which are submitted by the requesting Member State, without having to seek itself possible reasons of justifications.
Ob upoštevanju postopkovnega okvira, ki ga določa člen 95(4) in (6) Pogodbe ES, vključno zlasti s strogim rokom za sprejetje odločbe, bi se Komisija morala omejiti na proučitev ustreznosti elementov, ki jih ob vlogi zahteve predložijo države članice, ne da bi ji bilo treba sami iskati možne utemeljitve.
THE POSITION OF DENMARK
STALIŠČE DANSKE
The Kingdom of Denmark claims that its legislation ensures a higher level of protection of health and life of human in that it down lower maximum added amounts of E249 (potassium nitrite) and E250 (sodium nitrite) than the ones provided for in Directive 2006/52/EC, and does not allow the placing on the market of traditional meat products for which no ingoing amounts can be established.
Kraljevina Danska trdi, da njena zakonodaja zagotavlja višjo raven varovanja zdravja in življenja s tem, ko je znižala najvišje dodane količine E 249 (kalijev nitrit) in E 250 (natrijev nitrit), navedene v Direktivi 2006/52/ES, in ne dovoljuje dajanja v promet tradicionalnih mesnih izdelkov, za katere ni mogoče določiti dodanih količin.
Denmark considers that the Danish provisions are fully consistent with the recommendations which the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) made in 1990 and 1995, as well as with the opinion of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) of 26 November 2003, since they contain no exceptions to the principle of establishing maximum ‘added amounts’ as opposed to residual levels and lay down more differentiated maximum levels related to particular groups of meat products.
Danska meni, da so danske določbe popolnoma skladne s priporočiloma Znanstvenega odbora za hrano iz let 1990 in 1995, kot tudi z mnenjem Evropske agencije za varnost hrane (EFSA) z dne 26. novembra 2003, saj ne vsebujejo nobenih izjem načela določanja najvišjih „dodanih vrednosti“ v nasprotju z vrednostmi ostankov in določajo bolj raznolike najvišje vrednosti v zvezi z določenimi skupinami mesnih izdelkov.
Denmark acknowledges that in certain respects Directive 2006/52/EC complies with the scientific recommendations from the SCF and EFSA, in particular where, unlike the original version of Directive 95/2/EC it provides for ‘maximum added amounts’, as opposed to residual amounts and ‘indicative added amounts’.
Danska priznava, da je v določenih pogledih Direktiva 2006/52/ES v skladu s strokovnimi priporočili Znanstvenega odbora za hrano in EFSE, zlasti kjer v nasprotju s prvotno različico Direktive 2006/52/ES zagotavlja „najvišje dodane količine“ namesto količin ostankov in „okvirne dodane količine“.
It criticises, however, that there are exceptions to this principle, with the consequence that various traditionally produced meat products are still regulated from the point of view of residual amounts and considers that this can be a hazard to human health.
Kritizira pa izjeme tega načela, zaradi česar so številni tradicionalno proizvedeni mesni izdelki še vedno uravnavani z vidika količine ostankov, kar smatra kot nevarno za zdravje ljudi.
It stresses that the concentration of residual nitrite is a very uncertain marker of added nitrite and refers to studies which have shown that residual values may even mask extremely high additions of nitrites, leading to an unpredictably high formation of N-nitroso compounds.
Poudarja, da je koncentracija ostanka nitrita zelo nezanesljiv označevalec dodanega nitrita in se sklicuje na raziskave, ki so pokazale, da lahko količine ostanka celo prikrijejo zelo veliko količino dodanega nitrita, kar vodi do nepredvidljivo visokega tvorjenja N-nitrozo spojin.
Denmark also emphasises that nitrosamines, whose formation depends on the presence of nitrite in meat products, are genotoxic and carcinogenic, which is why the use of nitrites should be allowed only in the amounts that are absolutely necessary.
Danska prav tako poudarja, da so nitrozamini, katerih tvorba je odvisna od prisotnosti nitrita v mesnih izdelkih, genotoksični in kancerogeni, zaradi česar bi morala biti uporaba nitritov dovoljena samo v količinah, ki so nujno potrebne.
Denmark considers that the maximum added amounts set out in Directive 2006/52/EC are too high from a health point of view and that a technological need for these values has not been documented.
Danska meni, da so s stališča zdravja največje dodane količine iz Direktive 2006/52/ES previsoke in da tehnološka potreba za te vrednosti ni bila zapisana.
It contends that, in light of the advice given by the Community scientific bodies, the inhibition of growth of Clostridium botulinum could be achieved by keeping the limits within the range of 50-150 mg/kg nitrite and specifying the limits for categories of meat products depending on the scientifically based needs.
Trdi, da je ob upoštevanju nasveta znanstvenih organov Komisije rast Clostridium botulinum mogoče zavirati z omejitvijo 50–150 mg/kg in določitvijo meja za kategorije mesnih izdelkov glede na znanstveno utemeljene potrebe.
Given that approximately 90 % of the intake of cured meat products in Denmark consists of products to which a maximum amount of 60 mg/kg of added nitrite currently applies in Denmark, Denmark points out that the transposition of the Directive and the introduction of a general limit of 150 mg/kg for all cured meat products could lead to the intake of nitrites in Denmark rising by a factor of 2,3-2,4, which may imply a corresponding rise in the intake of preformed nitrosamines.
Ker približno 90 % porabe soljenih mesnih izdelkov na Danskem sestavljajo izdelki, za katere velja največja dodana količina nitrita 60 mg/kg, Danska poudarja, da bi prenos Direktive in uveljavitev splošne meje 150 mg/kg za vse soljene mesne izdelke vodil k 2,3–2,4-kratnemu povečanju zaužitja nitritov na Danskem, kar bi lahko pomenilo ustrezno povečanje zaužitja nitrozaminov.
Denmark stresses that, despite the fact that its rules providing for lower levels of nitrites which may be added have been in place for many years, they have proved adequate to prevent botulism.
Danska poudarja, da so se njena pravila kljub temu, da določajo nižje ravni nitritov, ki se lahko dodajajo, v veljavi že več let, izkazala kot zadostna za preprečevanje botulizma.
The Danish Government points out that these rules have never given rise to problems with the preservation of the products concerned and that Denmark has a very low rate of food poisoning cases caused by sausages compared with other Member States.
Danska vlada poudarja, da zaradi teh pravil nikoli ni bilo težav s konzerviranjem teh izdelkov in da ima Danska v primerjavi z ostalimi državami članicami zelo nizko stopnjo primerov zastrupitve zaradi klobas.
It states that there are fewer cases of botulism than in most other Member States.
Trdi, da ima manj primerov botulizma kot večina držav članic.
According to the European Communicable Disease Bulletin, Eurosurveillance, of January 1999, which is a special issue on botulism in Europe, botulism is very rare in Denmark.
Glede na Evropski bilten o nalezljivih boleznih, Eurosurveillance, iz januarja 1999, ki je posebna izdaja o botulizmu v Evropi, je botulizem na Danskem zelo redek.
The Danish health surveillance institution, the Statens Serum Institute, states on its website that after 1980 there have only occurred five cases of botulism amongst the Danish population, none of these being caused by the consumption of meat products.
Danski institut za nadzorovanje zdravja, Institut Statens Serum, na svoji spletni strani trdi, da se je po letu 1980 med danskim prebivalstvom pojavilo le pet primerov botulizma, noben pa ni bil povezan z zaužitjem mesnih izdelkov.