natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This Decision consequently does not prejudice any further investigation that the Commission may decide to undertake into the arrangements made in Decree-law No 159/07.
Ta odločba posledično ne posega v nobeno nadaljnjo preiskavo, ki bi jo Komisija morda izvedla v zvezi z dogovori iz Zakonskega odloka št. 159/07.
The Commission recalls that the case-law of the Court of Justice is clear: it was recently summarised in the opinion of Advocate-General Geelhoed in the Lucchini case.
Komisija opozarja, da je sodna praksa Sodišča jasna: nedavno je bila povzeta v mnenju generalnega pravobranilca Geelhoeda v zadevi Lucchini.
In that case the Court had to give a preliminary ruling on the question whether a judgment of a national court could prevent the exercise by the Commission of its exclusive power to verify the compatibility of state aid with the single market, and if necessary to order its recovery.
V tem primeru mora Sodišče predhodno odločiti o vprašanju, ali sodba nacionalnega sodišča lahko prepreči izvajanje izključne pristojnosti Komisije z namenom preverjanja združljivosti državne pomoči z enotnim trgom in po potrebi zahtevanja vračila pomoči.
It follows that a state has an obligation to respect the primacy of Community law, and the exclusive power of the Commission to determine the compatibility or otherwise of state aid.
Iz tega sledi, da mora država spoštovati primarnost zakonodaje Skupnosti in izključno pristojnost Komisije za ugotavljanje združljivosti ali drugačen položaj državne pomoči.
A national decision concerning aid (be it a Decree-law or a court judgment) cannot replace the procedure laid down for the valid granting of aid, which is concluded only when the Commission grants its authorisation.
Nacionalna odločba o pomoči (naj bo zakonski odlok ali sodba sodišča) ne more nadomestiti postopka, določenega za veljavno dodelitev pomoči, ki se sklene le, če Komisija odobri dovoljenje.
Conclusion of the assessment of the individual projects
Sklepna ugotovitev o oceni individualnih projektov
As described in paragraphs 0-0, the methodology adopted ensures that the aid granted to a project does not exceed maximum aid intensity allowed by the applicable R & D frameworks.
Kot je opisano v uvodnih izjavah 248–259, sprejeta metodologija omogoča, da pomoč, dodeljena projektu, ne presega največje intenzivnosti pomoči, ki je dovoljena v skladu z veljavnimi okviri za raziskave in razvoj.
When assessing aid to large R & D projects, the intensity of the aid — its proportionality — is one of the main factors the Commission takes into account.
Pri ocenjevanju pomoči za velike projekte za raziskave in razvoj je intenzivnost pomoči – njena sorazmernost – ena od glavnih dejavnikov, ki jih Komisija upošteva.
The Commission has also verified whether the initial maximum intensity was adhered to.
Komisija je tudi preverila, ali se je začetna največja intenzivnost upoštevala.
If a soft loan, because of the way it is disbursed or reimbursed, reaches an aid intensity above the level set at the moment of granting, the aid beyond that initial intensity has to be considered new aid.
Če ugodno posojilo zaradi načina, na katerega se izplača ali odplača, doseže intenzivnost pomoči nad stopnjo, ki je določena ob dodelitvi, se mora pomoč nad to začetno intenzivnostjo obravnavati kot nova pomoč.
Since this new aid is in all likelihood granted after the project has been terminated, and in any event only as a consequence of late payment, it has no incentive effect on the recipient.
Ker se nova pomoč zelo verjetno dodeli po koncu projekta in v vsakem primeru le kot posledica zamujenega plačila, nima spodbujevalnega učinka na prejemnika.
Thus it is not compatible under any of the R & D frameworks.
Zato ni združljiva z nobenim okvirom za raziskave in razvoj.
If the reimbursement schedules are adjusted to ensure that the maximum allowable intensity is adhered to, then the aid for these projects can be considered compatible.
Če se odplačilni roki prilagodijo za zagotovitev, da se upošteva največja dovoljena intenzivnost, se pomoč za te projekte lahko šteje za združljivo.
The Commission further notes that it is a regular feature of the aeronautical industry that projects have a long duration, and that reimbursements take place over periods that can even exceed fifteen years, bearing in mind among other things that projects often show a return only in the long term.
Komisija nadalje ugotavlja, da je dolgotrajnost projektov reden pojav v letalski industriji in da se odplačila opravljajo v obdobjih, ki so lahko celo daljša od 15 let, pri čemer se med drugim upošteva, da projekti pogosto kažejo rezultate le v dolgoročnem obdobju.
In the present case, aid payments have often been spread over several years, with reimbursement starting only after the end of the last payment and lasting more than ten years.
V tem primeru so bila izplačila pomoči pogosto razporejena na več let, pri čemer se je vračanje začelo šele po opravljenem zadnjem plačilu in je trajalo več kot deset let.
Overall the average duration of the projects, calculated from the beginning until final reimbursement, is around eighteen years.
Na splošno je povprečno trajanje projektov na podlagi izračuna od samega začetka do končnega vračila približno 18 let.
For the 17 projects referred to above, the Commission can conclude that the aid intensity corrected in accordance with the methodology adopted satisfies the requirements of the successive R & D frameworks.
Za navedenih 17 projektov Komisija lahko ugotovi, da intenzivnost pomoči, ki je bila popravljena v skladu s sprejeto metodologijo, izpolnjuje zahteve zaporednih okvirov za raziskave in razvoj.
This conclusion has been reached on the basis of the information available and in view of the measures very long duration.
Ta sklep je bil dosežen na podlagi dostopnih informacij in glede na zelo dolgotrajne ukrepe.
For the six projects regarding which it expressed doubts in the first initiating decision, the Commission has established, taking into account the long time that has elapsed since these projects were carried out, that the classification of the R & D activities was correct and was in line with the Commissions practice.
Za šest projektov, za katere je Komisija izrekla pomisleke v prvi odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka, je Komisija ugotovila, da je bila ob upoštevanju daljšega obdobja, ki je minilo od izvedbe teh projektov, razvrstitev raziskovalnih in razvojnih dejavnosti pravilna ter v skladu s prakso Komisije.
Finally, the Commission has also established that the six projects had an incentive effect.
Nazadnje je Komisija tudi ugotovila, da je šest projektov imelo spodbujevalni učinek.
THE TWO HELICOPTERS DESCRIBED AS MILITARY HELICOPTERS
HELIKOPTERJA, OPISANA KOT VOJAŠKA HELIKOPTERJA
As Italy explained in its reply of October 2005, the scheme has also been used to fund military R & D. In the first initiating decision it was accepted that one project was to be considered military, and thus fell within the scope of Article 296 of the Treaty.
Kot je Italija pojasnila v svojem odgovoru oktobra 2005, se je program uporabljal tudi za financiranje vojaških raziskav in razvoja. V prvi odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka je bilo sprejeto, da naj bi bil en projekt vojaški in bi tako spadal na področje uporabe člena 296 Pogodbe.
The Italian authorities have provided some information on the two helicopters referred to in the second initiating decision.
Italijanski organi so zagotovili nekaj informacij o dveh helikopterjih, navedenih v drugi odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka.
The anonymous third party submitted comments on both helicopters.
Anonimna tretja stranka je predložila pripombe o obeh helikopterjih.
In summary, Italy explained the development of the A139 helicopter, and of the number assigned to it, saying that the civilian AW139 helicopter had been developed by Agusta with a number of partners without receiving any state support.
Na kratko, Italija je pojasnila razvoj helikopterja A193 in dodeljeno številko, pri čemer je povedala, da je civilni helikopter AW139 razvila družba Agusta s številnimi partnerji in brez prejema državne pomoči.
But Italy stated that Agusta had indeed received assistance to develop a military helicopter, the […], which was in its final phase of development.
Toda Italija je navedla, da je družba Agusta dejansko prejela pomoč za razvoj vojaškega helikopterja […], ki je bil v zadnji fazi razvoja.
The anonymous third party indicated that in its view the A139 was an entirely civilian helicopter.
Anonimna tretja stranka je navedla, da je po njenem mnenju A139 v celoti civilni helikopter.
On the BA609, Italy said that Agustas involvement in the project was targeted at developing a tilt-rotor for military use.
Glede helikopterja BA609 je Italija menila, da je bilo sodelovanje družbe Agusta v projektu usmerjeno v razvijanje premičnega rotorja za vojaško uporabo.
The anonymous third party said, however, that all the information publicly available on the project indicated that the BA609 was a helicopter intended for civilian use.
Anonimna tretja stranka je kljub temu menila, da so javno dostopne informacije o projektu kazale na to, da je BA609 helikopter, namenjen za civilno uporabo.
On the basis of the information available, the Commission cannot reach a conclusion on these two projects.
Na podlagi dostopnih informacij Komisija ne more doseči sklepa v zvezi s tema projektoma.
It reserves the right to put further questions to Italy in order to clarify certain aspects of the projects before taking a final decision.
Pridržuje si pravico do zastavljanja dodatnih vprašanj Italiji z namenom pojasnitve nekaterih vidikov projektov, preden sprejme končno odločitev.
The two projects are consequently outside the scope of the present decision, and will be the subject of a separate decision.
Oba projekta sta trenutno zunaj obsega te odločbe in bosta predmet ločene odločbe.
In any event, however, the fact that an item of equipment is military in its nature and purpose is not by itself sufficient for an exemption from the Community rules on the basis of Article 296 of the EC Treaty.
V vsakem primer pa dejstvo, da je del opreme po naravi vojaški, in namen sam po sebi ne zadostujeta za izvzetje iz predpisov Skupnosti na podlagi člena 296 Pogodbe ES.
The measure must also be necessary for the protection of the essential interests of a Member States security.
Ukrep je potreben tudi za varstvo bistvenih interesov varnosti države članice.
According to the case-law of the Court of Justice, Article 296 must be interpreted strictly, and confined to exceptional, clearly defined cases.
Glede na sodno prakso Sodišča je treba člen 296 strogo obravnavati in ga omejiti na izjemne in jasno opredeljene zadeve.
Moreover, the burden of proving that the tests for exemption are satisfied rests on the Member State.
Poleg tega se breme dokazovanja, da so preskusi za izvzetje izpolnjeni, naloži državi članici.
Taking account of all the factors set out above, the Commission has decided to close the proceedings under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty with respect to the 17 individual R & D projects which Italy failed to notify and which were consequently granted unlawfully.
Ob upoštevanju vseh navedenih dejavnikov se je Komisija odločila, da konča postopke v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES v zvezi s 17 individualnimi raziskovalnimi in razvojnimi projekti, ki jih Italija ni priglasila in so bili posledično odobreni nezakonito.
Individual aid within the meaning of Article 1(e) of the Procedural Regulation which was notifiable, but was not notified, constitutes unlawful aid within the meaning of Article 1(f) of the Procedural Regulation.
Individualna pomoč v smislu člena 1(e) postopkovne uredbe, ki jo je treba priglasiti, vendar ni bila priglašena, predstavlja nezakonito pomoč v smislu člena 1(f) postopkovne uredbe.
Since this Decision concerns unlawful aid, it will be adopted on the basis of Article 13 of the Procedural Regulation.
Ker ta odločba zadeva nezakonito pomoč, se bo sprejela na podlagi člena 13 postopkovne uredbe.
Article 13 states that in the case of decisions to initiate the formal investigation procedure, proceedings are to be closed by means of a decision pursuant to Article 7.
Člen 13 navaja, da se v primeru odločb o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave postopek zaključi z odločbo na podlagi člena 7.
The present Decision is adopted under Article 7(4) of the Procedural Regulation with respect to all the individual projects referred to above, subject to the conditions of reimbursement indicated for each of the projects.
Ta odločba se sprejme na podlagi člena 7(4) postopkovne uredbe v zvezi z vsemi navedenimi individualnimi projekti ob upoštevanju pogojev odplačevanja, ki so navedeni za vsak projekt.
With regard to the doubts expressed in the first initiating decision in respect of six projects, the Commission concludes that the work packages constituted R & D activities, and that the aid had an incentive effect on the recipients.
V zvezi s pomisleki, ki so bili izraženi v prvi odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka, kar zadeva šest projektov, Komisija ugotavlja, da so delovni paketi predstavljali raziskovalne in razvojne dejavnosti ter da je pomoč imela spodbujevalen učinek za prejemnike.
The Commission can conclude that the aid instrument used throughout the application of the scheme has been a soft loan with an interest rate of zero.
Komisija lahko sklene, da je bil instrument pomoči, ki se je uporabljal med programom, ugodno posojilo z obrestno mero nič.
In the operation of the loan mechanism, however, the initial conditions have in several cases not been complied with, and the recipients have been allowed more generous terms.
V delovanju mehanizma posojil začetni pogoji vseeno v več primerih niso bili izpolnjeni, prejemnikom pa so bili omogočeni ugodnejši pogoji.
The Commission and the Italian authorities have been able to define a methodology to correct excessive initial intensities and insufficiently rigorous application of the aid mechanism.
Komisija in italijanski organi so lahko opredelili metodologijo za popravljanje prevelikih začetnih intenzivnosti in premalo stroge uporabe mehanizma pomoči.
The Commission has received from the Italian authorities a list of non-notified projects, with a reimbursement schedule calculated using this methodology for each project.
Italijanski organi so Komisiji predložili seznam nepriglašenih projektov skupaj z odplačilnimi roki, izračunanimi z uporabo te metodologije za vsak projekt.
The Italian authorities have undertaken to adhere to the reimbursement schedule for each of the projects referred to.
Italijanski organi so se zavezali k upoštevanju odplačilnih rokov za vsak naveden projekt.
The Italian authorities have undertaken to comply with the monitoring conditions indicated, that is say to ensure that the immediate reimbursements are made within two months from this decision, and that the Commission receives detailed yearly reporting on future reimbursements.
Italijanski organi so se zavezali k izpolnjevanju navedenih pogojev spremljanja, tj. za zagotavljanje, da se takojšnja odplačila opravijo v dveh mesecih od sprejetja te odločbe ter da prejme Komisija podrobna letna poročila o odplačilih v prihodnosti.
The list of projects is without prejudice to any case in which the Commission may become aware of a project or may receive further information on any project.
Seznam projektov ne posega v noben primer, pri katerem bi bila Komisija obveščena o določenem projektu ali bi o njem prejela dodatne informacije.
The Commission cannot reach a conclusion, however, on the two projects regarding whose military character it expressed doubts in the second initiating decision.
Kljub temu Komisija ne more sprejeti sklepa glede dveh projektov, pri katerih je v drugi odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka izrazila pomisleke v zvezi z vojaškim značajem projekta.
The Commission reserves the right to ask Italy for further information on these projects with a view to a decision in the near future,
Komisija si pridržuje pravico, da od Italije zahteva dodatne informacije o teh projektih z namenom sprejetja odločbe v bližnji prihodnosti –
The individual aid to the R & D projects in the aeronautical industry listed in paragraph 2 which was granted by Italy under Article 3(a) of the Italian Law of 24 December 1985, No 808, is compatible with the common market in accordance with Article 87(3) of the EC Treaty, subject to compliance with the conditions set out in Articles 2 and 3.
Individualna pomoč za raziskovalne in razvojne projekte v letalski industriji, navedena v odstavku 2, ki jo je Italija dodelila v skladu s členom 3(a) italijanskega Zakona št. 808 z dne 24. decembra 1985, je združljiva s skupnim trgom v skladu s členom 87(3) Pogodbe ES ob upoštevanju pogojev, ki so določeni v členih 2 in 3.
The projects concerned are the following:
Zadevni projekti so naslednji:
aid to Augusta: the A109 D/E/F, A109 X, and A119 Koala projects;
pomoč za družbo Agusta: projekti A109 D/E/F, A109 X in A119 Koala;
aid to Aermacchi: the DO328, DO328 Extended Capacity and DO328 Panels projects;
pomoč za družbo Aermacchi: projekti DO328, DO328 Extended Capacity in DO328 Panels;
aid to Alenia: the ATR72, ATR42 500, MD11 LWRP J/S, Falcon 2000, MD11 Winglet, MD95 and Pressurised Cabins projects;
pomoč za družbo Alenia: projekti ATR72, ATR42 500, MD11 LWRP J/S, Falcon 2000, MD11 Winglet, MD95 in Kabine z uravnavanjem tlaka;
aid to Avio: the GE90 B, GE90 Growth and LPT PW308 projects; and
pomoč za družbo Avio: projekti GE90 B, GE90 Growth in LPT PW308 ter
aid to Piaggio: the Falcon 2000 project.
pomoč za družbo Piaggio: projekt Falcon 2000.
For the following projects and recipients the Italian Republic shall ensure that the following conditions are met:
Za naslednje projekte in prejemnike Italijanska republika zagotovi izpolnitev naslednjih pogojev:
aid to Augusta
pomoč za družbo Agusta
for the A109 D/E/F project, the outstanding principal is to be reimbursed immediately, with compound interest;
za projekt A109 D/E/F je treba neporavnano glavnico takoj odplačati skupaj z obrestnimi obrestmi;
for the A109 X project, the reimbursement schedule is to be adhered to until full reimbursement of the loan by 31 December 2018;
za projekt A109 X je treba upoštevati odplačilne roke, dokler posojilo ni odplačano v celoti do 31. decembra 2018;
For the A119 Koala project, the reimbursement schedule is to be adhered to until full reimbursement of the loan by 31 December 2009;
za projekt A119 Koala je treba upoštevati odplačilne roke, dokler posojilo ni odplačano v celoti do 31. decembra 2009;
aid to Aermacchi
pomoč za družbo Aermacchi
for the DO328 project, the outstanding principal is to be reimbursed immediately;
za projekt DO328 je treba neporavnano glavnico takoj odplačati;
for the DO328 Extended Capacity project, the reimbursement schedule is to be adhered to until full reimbursement of the loan by 31 December 2009;
za projekt DO328 Extended Capacity je treba upoštevati odplačilne roke, dokler posojilo ni odplačano v celoti do 31. decembra 2009;
for the DO328 Panels project, the outstanding principal is to be reimbursed immediately, with compound interest;
za projekt DO328 Panels je treba neporavnano glavnico takoj odplačati skupaj z obrestnimi obrestmi;
aid to Alenia
pomoč za družbo Alenia
for the ATR72 project, the outstanding principal is to be reimbursed immediately, with compound interest;
za projekt ATR72 se mora neporavnana glavnica takoj odplačati skupaj z obrestnimi obrestmi;
for the ATR42-500 project, the outstanding principal is to be reimbursed immediately, with compound interest;
za projekt ATR42-500 se mora neporavnana glavnica takoj odplačati skupaj z obrestnimi obrestmi;
for the Falcon 2000 project, the outstanding principal is to be reimbursed immediately, with compound interest;
za projekt Falcon 2000 se mora neporavnana glavnica takoj odplačati skupaj z obrestnimi obrestmi;
for the MD11 Winglet project, the outstanding principal is to be reimbursed immediately, with compound interest;
za projekt MD11 Winglet se mora neporavnana glavnica takoj odplačati skupaj z obrestnimi obrestmi;
for the MD95 project, the reimbursement schedule is to be adhered to until full reimbursement of the loan by 31 December 2008;
za projekt MD95 je treba upoštevati odplačilne roke, dokler posojilo ni odplačano v celoti do 31. decembra 2008;
for the Pressurised Cabins project, the outstanding principal is to be reimbursed immediately, with compound interest;
za projekt Kabine z uravnavanjem tlaka se mora neporavnana glavnica takoj odplačati skupaj z obrestnimi obrestmi;
aid to Avio
pomoč za družbo Avio
for the GE90 B project, the outstanding principal is to be reimbursed immediately, with compound interest;
za projekt GE90 B se mora neporavnana glavnica takoj odplačati skupaj z obrestnimi obrestmi;
for the GE90 Growth project, the outstanding principal is to be reimbursed immediately, with compound interest;
za projekt GE90 Growth se mora neporavnana glavnica takoj odplačati skupaj z obrestnimi obrestmi;
for the LPT PW308 project, the reimbursement schedule is to be adhered to until full reimbursement of the loan by 31 December 2013;
za projekt LPT PW308 je treba upoštevati odplačilne roke, dokler posojilo ni odplačano v celoti do 31. decembra 2013;
aid to Piaggio
pomoč za družbo Piaggio
for the Falcon 2000 project, the reimbursement schedule is to be adhered to until full reimbursement of the loan by 31 December 2013.
za projekt Falcon 2000 je treba upoštevati odplačilne roke, dokler posojilo ni odplačano v celoti do 31. decembra 2013.
Immediate reimbursement must take place within two months of this Decision, in accordance with the procedures of national law, provided that they allow the immediate and effective enforcement of the Decision.
Takojšnje odplačilo se mora izvesti v dveh mesecih od sprejetja te odločbe in v skladu s postopki nacionalne zakonodaje, če ti dopuščajo takojšnjo in učinkovito izvedbo te odločbe.
In the cases of immediate reimbursement the interest applied shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
V primerih takojšnjega odplačila se uporabljene obresti izračunajo z obrestnoobrestnim računom v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 794/2004.
Within two months of notification of this Decision, the Italian Republic shall provide the following information to the Commission:
V dveh mesecih od obvestila o tej odločbi Italijanska republika predloži Komisiji naslednje informacije:
the total amount reimbursed by the recipients;
skupni znesek, ki so ga odplačali prejemniki;
a detailed description of the measures taken and to be taken to comply with this Decision;
podroben opis sprejetih ukrepov za delovanje v skladu s to odločbo;
documents demonstrating that aid has been reimbursed.
dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da je bila pomoč vrnjena.
The Italian Republic shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until reimbursement of the aid referred to in Article 2 has been completed.
Italijanska republika obvešča Komisijo o napredku glede sprejetih nacionalnih ukrepov za izvajanje te odločbe, dokler se vračanje pomoči iz člena 2 ne konča.
If so requested by the Commission it shall immediately provide information on the measures already taken and to be taken to comply with this Decision.
Na zahtevo Komisije Italijanska republika takoj predloži vse informacije o že sprejetih ukrepih in prihodnjih ukrepih za delovanje v skladu s to odločbo.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amount of aid reimbursed and interest paid by the recipients.
Zagotovi tudi podrobne informacije o zneskih pomoči in obrestih, ki so jih prejemniki vrnili in plačali.
In those cases where reimbursement schedules continue beyond 2008, Italy shall supply to the Commission an annual report on the payments received by the recipients, certified by auditors.
Če se odplačilni roki nadaljujejo po letu 2008, Italija predloži Komisiji letno poročilo o plačilih prejemnikov, ki so ga potrdili revizorji.
OJ C 16, 22.1.2004, p. 2, and OJ C 252, 12.10.2005, p. 10.
UL C 16, 22.1.2004, str. 2, in UL C 252, 12.10.2005, str. 10.
Case N 281/84, letter SG(86) 5685 dated 14.5.1986.
Zadeva N 281/84, dopis SG(86) 5685, 14.5.1986.
See footnotes 3 and 4.
Glej opombi 3 in 4.