natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Following the imposition of a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain tungsten electrodes originating in the PRC, some interested parties submitted comments in writing.
Po uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih volframovih elektrod s poreklom iz LRK so nekatere zainteresirane stranke predložile pisne pripombe.
The oral and written comments submitted by the parties were examined and, where considered appropriate, the provisional findings were modified accordingly.
Po proučitvi ustnih in pisnih pripomb, ki so jih predložile stranke, so bile začasne ugotovitve po potrebi ustrezno spremenjene.
To this end, the Commission carried out further verification visits at the premises of the following companies:
V ta namen je Komisija opravila nadaljnje preveritvene obiske v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Unrelated importer in the Community:
Nepovezani uvoznik v Skupnosti:
Comptoir Lyonnais de Soudage SA, Lyon, France;
Comptoir Lyonnais de Soudage SA, Lyon, Francija.
Related companies in the Community:
Povezani družbi v Skupnosti:
Alexander Binzel Schweißtechnik GmbH & Co., KG, Buseck, Germany,
Alexander Binzel Schweiβtechnik GmbH & Co. KG, Buseck, Nemčija,
Binzel France Sarl, Strasbourg, France.
Binzel France Sarl, Strasbourg, Francija.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain tungsten electrodes originating in the PRC and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of the provisional duty.
Vse stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti uvedba dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih volframovih elektrod s poreklom iz LRK in dokončno pobiranje zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo.
The product concerned is tungsten welding electrodes (TE), including tungsten bars and rods for welding electrodes, containing 94 % or more by weight of tungsten, other than those obtained simply by sintering, whether of not cut to length.
Zadevni izdelek so volframove varilne elektrode („VE“), vključno z volframovimi palicami za varilne elektrode, ki vsebujejo 94 mas. % ali več volframa, razen tistih, ki so dobljene samo s sintranjem, razrezane ali nerazrezane na določene dolžine.
It is currently classifiable within CN codes ex81019910 and ex85159000 (CN codes since 1 January 2007).
Trenutno se uvršča pod oznaki KN ex81019910 in ex85159000 (oznaki KN od 1. januarja 2007).
One importer argued against the conclusion drawn in recital 13 of the provisional Regulation that all TE are considered to constitute a single product for the purpose of this proceeding.
En uvoznik se ni strinjal z ugotovitvijo iz uvodne izjave (13) začasne uredbe, da se vse VE za namene tega postopka šteje kot en izdelek.
This importer emphasised the varying properties of different types of TE and in particular one patented type developed by the importer himself.
Ta uvoznik je opozoril na spreminjajoče se lastnosti različnih vrst VE in zlasti ene patentirane vrste, ki jo je razvil prav on.
However, since the beginning of the investigation, the Commission has been aware that there are several types of TE.
Vendar pa se je Komisija od začetka preiskave zavedala, da obstaja več vrst VE.
As well as being sold in different lengths and thicknesses, TE can be made either from pure tungsten or alloyed with a small percentage of a metal such as thorium, lanthanum, cerium, zirconium, or a combination of those.
Poleg tega, da se VE prodaja v različnih dolžinah in debelinah, je lahko iz čistega volframa ali zlitina z majhnim deležem kovine, kot so torij, lantan, cerij, cirkonij, ali kombinacije navedenih kovin.
This alloying affects the properties of the electrodes namely in terms of ignitability, stability and durability, allowing them to be better tailored for specific applications.
To legiranje vpliva na lastnosti elektrod, zlasti glede vnetljivosti, stabilnosti in trdnosti, ter jim omogoča, da so prilagojene posamezni uporabi.
Despite the variations in technical features of the different types of TE, it is considered that their common basic physical characteristics and degree of substitutability are sufficient to consider them as a single product for the purpose of this proceeding as they share the same basic physical and chemical characteristics.
Ne glede na razlike v tehničnih lastnostih različnih vrst VE se šteje, da njihove skupne osnovne fizikalne lastnosti in stopnja zamenljivosti zadostujejo, da se za namene tega postopka obravnavajo kot en izdelek, saj imajo enake osnovne fizikalne in kemijske lastnosti.
It should be noted, however, that the different types of TE as mentioned above have been taken into consideration for the purpose of calculating the dumping and injury margins.
Vendar pa je treba opozoriti, da so se različne vrste VE, kakor je navedeno zgoraj, upoštevale za namen izračunavanja stopenj dampinga in škode.
The importer referred to in recital 8, also pointed to the differences in the production processes between the European and Chinese producers, and claimed that these lead to a higher quality of the Chinese TE.
Uvoznik iz uvodne izjave (8) je prav tako opozoril na razlike v proizvodnih postopkih med evropskimi in kitajskimi proizvajalci ter trdil, da so ti vzrok za večjo kakovost kitajskih VE.
Furthermore, an exporting producer claimed that its electrodes are of better quality than those of its competitors and in any event better tailored for the main product manufactured by the group, the TIG welding torch.
Poleg tega je proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da so njegove elektrode boljše kakovosti kot elektrode njegovih konkurentov in v vsakem primeru ustreznejše za glavni izdelek, ki ga proizvaja skupina, in sicer varilni gorilnik TIG.
Regarding the latter claim, it should be stressed that according to the available evidence, any quality differences are not such as to prevent the use of electrodes produced by other producers in this specific application, even if they would not provide the optimal fitting to the torches.
V zvezi s slednjo trditvijo je treba poudariti, da glede na razpoložljive dokaze nobena kakovostna razlika ni takšna, da bi v tem primeru onemogočila uporabo elektrod, ki so jih proizvedli drugi proizvajalci, čeprav ne bi zagotovila optimalne namestitve v gorilnike.
As for the alleged general quality differences, as pointed out by the importer, between the TE produced and sold by the Community industry in the Community and the TE imported into the Community from the PRC, there was no objective information available to corroborate or quantify such a perceived general quality difference.
Kar zadeva domnevne splošne kakovostne razlike, ki jih je navajal uvoznik, med VE, ki jih proizvede in proda industrija Skupnosti v Skupnosti, in VE, uvoženimi v Skupnost iz LRK, ni bilo na voljo objektivnih informacij, ki bi potrdile ali ocenile takšno zaznano splošno kakovostno razliko.
Therefore the TE produced and sold by the Community industry in the Community and the TE imported into the Community from the PRC have been considered alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation, and no adjustment was made in this respect in the injury calculations.
Zato so se VE, ki jih proizvede in proda industrija Skupnosti v Skupnosti, in VE, uvožene v Skupnost iz LRK, obravnavale enako v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe in glede tega pri izračunu škode ni bilo prilagoditev.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the product concerned and the like product, recitals 12 to 15 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene druge pripombe v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom in podobnim izdelkom, se uvodne izjave (12) do (15) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The exporting producer for which MET was rejected, since it did not fulfil the second MET criterion as set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, argued that the discrepancies found in its accounting system concerned only a few cases and that in the meantime its system had been improved in order to meet the international accounting standards.
Proizvajalec izvoznik, ki mu je bil TGO zavrnjen, ker ni izpolnjeval drugega merila TGO iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, je trdil, da so v njegovem računovodskem sistemu ugotovljena neskladja zadevala zgolj nekaj primerov in da je medtem izboljšal svoj sistem, da bi tako izpolnil mednarodne računovodske standarde.
The company, however, did not substantiate this claim or provide any evidence.
Vendar pa ta družba svoje trditve ni utemeljila in ni zagotovila nobenega dokaza.
Moreover, from the evidence gathered during the on-the-spot verification it is clear that the practices found were in clear violation of IAS as well as Chinese accounting rules, even if they would have been corrected after the IP.
Poleg tega je na podlagi dokazov, zbranih med preveritvenim obiskom na kraju samem, jasno, da ugotovljene prakse kršijo mednarodne računovodske standarde in kitajska računovodska pravila, čeprav so bile po OP popravljene.
In the absence of any other arguments regarding the granting of MET, the findings as set out in recitals 16 to 21 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih argumentov v zvezi z odobritvijo TGO, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (16) do (21) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Following the provisional disclosure, the Community industry contested the granting of IT to the exporting producer referred to above in recital 13, since discrepancies were found in the company’s accounts also with regard to the recording of export sales.
Po začasnem razkritju je industrija Skupnosti nasprotovala odobritvi IO za proizvajalca izvoznika, omenjenega v uvodni izjavi (13), saj so bila ugotovljena neskladja v računovodskih izkazih družbe tudi v zvezi z beleženjem izvozne prodaje.
In this respect it should be noted that the company fulfilled all criteria set out in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation and therefore there was no reason to reject its IT claim.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je družba izpolnila merila iz člena 9(5) osnovne uredbe in zato ni bilo razloga za zavrnitev njihovega zahtevka za IO.
Moreover, all evidence related to the company’s very few export transactions to the Community in the IP could be obtained during the on-the-spot verification of the main anti-dumping questionnaire, and a single necessary correction to its export data could be made immediately.
Poleg tega bi se lahko med preverjanjem glavnega protidampinškega vprašalnika na kraju samem pridobili vsi dokazi, povezani z nizkim številom izvoznih transakcij družbe v Skupnost v obdobju IO, v njegovih izvoznih podatkih pa bi se lahko takoj opravil zgolj en potreben popravek.
Therefore the claim of the Community industry was rejected.
Zato je bila zahteva industrije Skupnosti zavrnjena.
In the absence of any other comments in this respect, the findings concerning IT as set out in recitals 22 to 25 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s tem ni bilo nobene druge pripombe, se ugotovitve glede IO iz uvodnih izjav (22) do (25) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Following the provisional disclosure, the exporting producer concerned presented a monthly normal value by linking the verified, average normal value of the IP to the price development of the main raw material, ammonium paratungstate (APT), in order to demonstrate that when comparing with the monthly export prices there was no more dumping towards the end of the IP.
Po začasnem razkritju je zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik predstavil mesečno normalno vrednost, tako da je povezal povprečno normalno vrednost v OP z gibanjem cen glavne surovine, amonijevega paravolframata („APT“); s tem je želel ponazoriti, da v primerjavi z mesečnimi izvoznimi cenami proti koncu OP ni bilo več dampinga.
Moreover, this monthly normal value suggested that the provisional finding of dumping was essentially caused by the dramatic price increase of APT, to which the company did not react immediately by increasing its export sales prices, but only at the end of the IP.
Poleg tega je ta mesečna normalna vrednost kazala na to, da je začasno ugotovitev dampinga v glavnem povzročilo precejšnje povečanje cene APT, na katero se družba s povečanjem svojih izvoznih prodajnih cen ni odzvala takoj, ampak šele na koncu OP.
The company asked the Commission to take this development into account and to consider calculating the dumping margin based on the last six months or last quarter of the IP solely.
Družba je Komisijo prosila, da to upošteva in razmisli o izračunavanju stopnje dampinga na osnovi samo zadnjih šestih mesecev ali zadnje četrtine OP.
This claim, however, had to be rejected, as differing from the IP would be discriminatory towards all other companies investigated, which were affected in the same way by that general price increase of APT.
Vendar pa je bilo treba to zahtevo zavrniti, saj bi bil odmik od OP diskriminatoren do vseh drugih preiskovanih družb, na katere je splošno povišanje cen APT vplivalo enako.
The request is also in conflict with the concept of an investigation period.
Zahteva je prav tako v nasprotju z načelom obdobja preiskave.
Indeed, it amounts to selectively choosing data from part of the investigation period and puts thus into question the representativity of the findings.
Pomeni selektivno izbirati podatke iz dela obdobja preiskovanja in tako vzbuja dvome o reprezentativnosti ugotovitev.
In that context, further to the provisional disclosure, the Community industry claimed that an adjustment should be made to the raw material costs used for the construction of the normal value of the company granted MET.
V zvezi s tem je po začasnem razkritju industrija Skupnosti trdila, da je treba prilagoditi stroške surovin, uporabljenih za oblikovanje normalne vrednosti družb, ki jim je bil odobren TGO.
In the view of the Community industry such an adjustment would be justified pursuant to Articles 2(3) and 2(5) of the basic Regulation, as the Chinese tungsten market is subject to State interference at the macroeconomic level and hence the domestic prices of the main raw material, APT, have remained consistently lower than the export prices of APT.
Po mnenju industrije Skupnosti bi takšna prilagoditev bila upravičena v skladu s členoma 2(3) in 2(5) osnovne uredbe, saj na kitajski trg volframa posega država na makroekonomski ravni in zato domače cene glavne surovine APT ves čas ostajajo nižje kot izvozne cene APT.
The above claim was examined by analysing the effects of the Chinese government’s policies at the macroeconomic level, which might lead to different price levels of APT between the domestic and export markets.
Zgoraj navedene trditve so bile preverjene z analizo učinkov politik kitajske vlade na makroekonomski ravni, ki bi lahko vodile do različnih cenovnih ravni APT na domačem in izvoznem trgu.
The investigation showed that the Chinese VAT export refund policy discourages to a certain extent the export of tungsten and related products such as APT as exporters are refunded for only part of the VAT paid on the domestically sourced raw material.
Preiskava je pokazala, da kitajska politika povračila DDV pri izvozu do neke mere zavira izvoz volframa in povezanih izdelkov, kot je APT, saj se izvoznikom na doma nabavljeno surovino povrne zgolj del plačanega DDV.
This also implies that producers of TE incur an additional cost when exporting.
To tudi pomeni, da imajo proizvajalci VE pri izvozu dodatne stroške.
Therefore, an adjustment was made to the normal value, pursuant to Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation, to reflect the total cost incurred as a result of the abovementioned VAT scheme.
Zato se je opravila prilagoditev normalne vrednosti v skladu s členom 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe, ki odraža skupen strošek, nastal na podlagi zgoraj omenjenega sistema DDV.
It is not considered that any further adjustment is required.
Šteje se, da nadaljnje prilagoditve niso potrebne.
Apart from the abovementioned adjustment to the normal value, the general methodology as set out in recitals 26 to 33 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Razen za zgoraj omenjene prilagoditve normalne vrednosti, se splošna metodologija iz uvodnih izjav (26) do (33) začasne uredbe potrdi.
Determination of normal value for the exporting producers in the PRC not granted MET
Določitev normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK, ki jim ni bila odobrena TGO
In the absence of any relevant comments regarding the use of the USA as an analogue country, recitals 34 to 38 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo ustreznih pripomb glede uporabe ZDA kot primerljive države, se uvodne izjave (34) do (38) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments with regard to the determination of the normal value for the exporting producers not granted MET, recitals 39 to 46 of the provisional Regulation are definitively confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb o določitvi normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim ni bil odobren TGO, se uvodne izjave (39) do (46) začasne uredbe dokončno potrdijo.
Regarding the export prices of one company granted IT as well as the cooperating company not granted MET/IT, whose dumping margin served as the basis for the country-wide dumping margin, as explained in recitals 54 to 56 of the provisional Regulation, export prices were revised by excluding two transactions falling outside the IP.
Izvozne cene ene družbe, ki ji je bila odobrena IO, in sodelujoče družbe, ki ji TGO/IO nista bili odobreni, njena stopnja dampinga pa je bila uporabljena kot osnova stopnje dampinga na ravni države, kakor je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah (54) do (56) začasne uredbe, so bile pregledane, pri tem pa sta bili izključeni dve transakciji, ki nista spadali v OP.
Following the provisional disclosure, the exporting producer granted MET, whose export sales to the Community were made via a related importer and subsequently resold to related and unrelated companies in the Community, claimed that the SG&A costs of its related companies, used for the construction of the export price pursuant to Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, were overestimated and did not reflect the costs generated by the sales of TE.
Po začasnem razkritju je proizvajalec izvoznik, ki mu je bila odobrena TGO in je v Skupnost izvažal prek povezanega uvoznika in nato nadalje prodajal povezanim in nepovezanim družbam v Skupnosti, trdil, da so bili stroški PSA njegovih povezanih družb, uporabljeni za oblikovanje izvozne cene v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe, precenjeni in niso odražali stroškov od prodaje VE.
The exporting producer requested the Commission to use the original SG&A presented in the questionnaire replies of the related distributors, which could not been accepted initially in the absence of evidence regarding the cost allocation method.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je zahteval, da Komisija uporabi originalne stroške PSA, navedene v izpolnjenih vprašalnikih povezanih distributerjev, ki zaradi pomanjkanja dokazov za metodo razporeditve stroškov na začetku niso bili sprejemljivi.
The company presented supporting evidence for the allocation method used originally, which was based on an internal standard, used by the companies historically.
Družba je predložila ustrezne dokaze za prvotno uporabljeno metodo razporeditve stroškov, osnovano na internih standardih, ki so jih družbe uporabljale v preteklosti.
The evidence provided was subsequently verified on the spot and it was found that the original allocation method corresponded to the costs associated with the sales of TE.
Predloženi dokaz je bil naknadno preverjen na kraju samem in ugotovljeno je bilo, da je prvotna metoda razporeditve stroškov ustrezala stroškom, povezanim s prodajo VE.
Hence, the claim was accepted and the SG&A costs of the related distributors were adjusted accordingly.
Zato je bil zahtevek sprejet, stroški PSA povezanih distributerjev pa so bili ustrezno prilagojeni.
With regard to the profit margin of the two unrelated importers, one of which was provisionally used for the constructed export price of the abovementioned exporting producer, it was found that those profit margins should not be used since their business activities are not sufficiently comparable to that of the related importer concerned.
V zvezi s stopnjo dobička dveh nepovezanih uvoznikov, ena od teh je bila uporabljena za oblikovano izvozno ceno zgoraj omenjenega proizvajalca izvoznika, je bilo ugotovljeno, da se navedenih stopenj dobička ne sme uporabljati, saj njihove poslovne dejavnosti niso dovolj primerljive s poslovnimi dejavnostmi zadevnega povezanega uvoznika.
Indeed, the majority of the TE imported by this related importer are further integrated into the main product produced by the group, the welding torch.
Dejansko je večina uvoženih VE s strani povezanega uvoznika nadalje vgrajenih v glavni izdelek, ki ga proizvaja skupina, in sicer varilni gorilnik.
It should also be noted that the TE are of minor value compared to the end-product.
Prav tako je treba opozoriti, da je VE v primerjavi s končnim izdelkom vredna malo.
On this basis it was concluded that the related importer’s own profit margin would constitute a more accurate basis for a profit margin to construct the export price.
Na tej osnovi je bilo sklenjeno, da bi stopnja dobička povezanega uvoznika predstavljala natančnejšo osnovo za oblikovanje izvozne cene.
No other comments were received with regard to export prices, and hence the general methodology as set out in recitals 47 and 48 of the provisional Regulation, with the exception of the use of the related importer’s own profit margin for the constructed export price of the producer granted MET, as described above, is hereby confirmed.
V zvezi z izvoznimi cenami ni bilo drugih pripomb, zato se splošna metodologija iz uvodnih izjav (47) in (48) osnovne uredbe, razen uporabe stopnje dobička povezanega uvoznika za konstruirano izvozno ceno proizvajalca, ki mu je bil odobren TGO, kakor je opisano zgoraj, potrdi.
The normal values, as described above in recitals 17 to 20 and 22 and the export prices, revised as explained above in recitals 23 to 26 were compared on an ex-works basis.
Normalne vrednosti, kakor so opisane v uvodnih izjavah (17) do (20) in (22), in izvozne cene, pregledane in pojasnjene v uvodnih izjavah (23) do (26), so se primerjale na podlagi franko tovarna.
In order to ensure a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price, account was taken, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, of differences in factors which were claimed and demonstrated to affect prices and price comparability.
Za zagotovitev poštene primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno so bile v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe upoštevane razlike v dejavnikih, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno in dokazano, da vplivajo na cene in primerljivost cen.
The factors for which adjustments were accepted were indirect taxes as described in recital 19, transport, insurance, handling and ancillary costs, packing, credit, and bank charges.
Prilagoditve so bile odobrene za posredne davke iz uvodne izjave (19), stroške prevoza, zavarovanja, manipulativne stroške in druge tozadevne stroške, stroške pakiranja, kredita in bančne stroške.
In the light of the above, the definitive dumping margin, expressed as a percentage of the cif Community frontier price, duty unpaid, is as follows:
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je dokončna stopnja dampinga, izražena kot odstotek cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, naslednja:
For the cooperating exporting producers granted IT
Za sodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika, ki jima je bila odobrena TGO
Following the adjustment to the export price of the other company granted IT, the definitive dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the cif Community frontier price, duty unpaid, are as follows:
Po prilagoditvi izvozne cene druge družbe, ki ji je bila odobrena TGO, so dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, naslednje: