natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As indicated above, the aid to be recovered from the fisheries undertakings as a whole is equivalent to the EUR 65 or 77 million of advances, less the amount to be recovered from the FPAP in accordance with the details given in recital 136.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, pomoč, ki jo morajo vrniti vsa ribiška podjetja, znaša 65 ali 77 milijonov EUR predplačil, zmanjšanih za znesek, ki ga mora vrniti FPAP v skladu z navedbami v uvodni izjavi 136.
As regards the State aid to be recovered from each one of those undertakings, account must be taken of the fact that it is not possible, from an accounting point of view, to make a distinction between aid which is classified as State aid and aid which is not imputable to the State (see paragraph 4.2.1.2 of this Decision).
Pri določitvi državne pomoči, ki jo mora vrniti vsako od teh podjetij, je treba upoštevati dejstvo, da z računovodskega vidika ni mogoče razlikovati med pomočjo, opredeljeno kot državna pomoč, in pomočjo, ki je ni mogoče pripisati državi (glej odstavek 4.2.1.2 te odločbe).
The Commission takes the view that the State aid to be recovered from each undertaking can be calculated on the basis of the allowance received by each undertaking under the diesel insurance.
Komisija meni, da se državna pomoč, ki jo mora vrniti vsako podjetje, lahko izračuna na podlagi nadomestila, ki jo je vsako podjetje prejelo iz naslova zavarovanja za gorivo.
By taking this allowance as the basis for calculation, the Commission leaves aside the subsidy-equivalent of the saving made by each fisheries undertaking as a result of the purchase of fuel at a price lower than the market price.
Komisija ob upoštevanju tega nadomestila kot podlage za izračun ne upošteva ekvivalenta dotacije sredstev, ki jih je privarčevalo vsako ribiško podjetje zaradi nakupa goriva po ceni, ki je nižja od tržne.
The Commission considers that it is justified to do so because the undertakings which benefited from preferential prices for their fuel are the same as those which benefited from the allowances under the diesel insurance. They did this in completely comparable respective proportions since the more one undertaking bought fuel at a preferential price the more allowances it obtained, and vice versa.
Komisija meni, da je to upravičeno, ker so podjetja, ki so bila deležna preferenčnih cen za gorivo, prejela tudi nadomestilo iz naslova zavarovanja za gorivo, in to v povsem primerljivih deležih, kajti več kot je podjetje kupilo goriva po preferenčni ceni, višja nadomestila je dobilo, in obratno.
By choosing this basis, no element of distortion is thus introduced between the undertakings concerned in relation to the repayment obligations which they will have to meet.
Če se izbere ta podlaga, torej ne bo nastalo izkrivljanje med zadevnimi podjetji glede na obveznosti vračila, ki jih bodo morala izpolniti.
Also, the Commission notes that, if these subsidy-equivalents were to be taken into account in the basis for calculation, it would be necessary for this purpose to calculate, for each purchase of fuel carried out in the FPAP’s period of activity on the oil futures markets, the difference between the expenditure which would have resulted from purchase during the day in question and the cost actually invoiced by the cooperative after having determined what the price on the day applicable would have been for the type of fuel bought at the particular place of supply.
Komisija poleg tega ugotavlja, da bi bilo treba, če želimo v podlagi za izračun upoštevati te ekvivalente dotacije, za vsako oskrbo z gorivom, opravljeno v obdobju dejavnosti FPAP na naftnih terminskih trgih, izračunati razliko med izdatkom, ki bi nastal pri nakupu po dnevnem tečaju, in ceno, ki jo je zadruga dejansko zaračunala, potem ko je ugotovila, kateri dnevni tečaj naj bi se uporabljal za vrsto kupljenega goriva in kraj oskrbe.
This method would have been more difficult to implement.
To metodo bi bilo teže uporabiti.
That is why the Commission thinks it preferable to recommend a basis for calculation which will facilitate the task of the authorities and bodies instructed to implement the recovery Decision.
Zato se Komisiji zdi bolje priporočiti podlago za izračun, ki bo olajšala delo organov, pristojnih za izvršitev odločbe o vračilu.
Consequently, the Commission considers that the State aid to be recovered from each undertaking can be calculated on the basis of the allowance received by each undertaking under the diesel insurance.
Komisija zato meni, da se državna pomoč, ki jo mora vrniti vsako podjetje, lahko izračuna na podlagi nadomestila, ki jo je vsako podjetje prejelo iz naslova zavarovanja za gorivo.
The State aid to be recovered must be calculated by multiplying that allowance by a percentage corresponding to the ratio of the overall amount of the State aid to be recovered from the fisheries undertakings to the overall amount of the allowances paid to the fisheries undertakings by the FPAP under the diesel insurance.
Državna pomoč, ki jo je treba vrniti, se mora izračunati tako, da se to nadomestilo pomnoži z odstotkom, ki ustreza razmerju med skupnim zneskom državne pomoči, ki ga morajo vrniti ribiška podjetja, in skupnim zneskom nadomestil, ki jih je ribiškim podjetjem nakazal FPAP iz naslova zavarovanja za gorivo.
The amount to be recovered from each fisheries undertaking must thus be calculated according to the following formulas:
Znesek, ki ga mora vrniti vsako ribiško podjetje, je torej treba izračunati po naslednjih formulah:
R*Und = I × Advances – R*FPAP
R*Ent = I × Predplačila – R*FPAP
Total I
Skupaj I
Where:
ali
R*Und amount to be recovered from the fisheries undertaking
R*Ent znesek, ki ga mora vrniti ribiško podjetje,
I amount of the allowance received by the fisheries undertaking under the diesel insurance
I znesek nadomestila, ki ga je ribiško podjetje prejelo iz naslova zavarovanja za gorivo,
Advances EUR 65 or 77 million
Predplačila 65 ali 77 milijonov EUR,
R*FPAP amount to be recovered from the FPAP in accordance with the details given in recital 136
R*FPAP znesek, ki ga mora FPAP vrniti v skladu z navedbami v uvodni izjavi 136,
Total I total amount of the allowances paid by the FPAP to the fisheries undertakings under the diesel insurance
Skupaj I skupni znesek nadomestil, ki jih je FPAP nakazal ribiškim podjetjem iz naslova zavarovanja za gorivo.
This formula takes account of the supposition that the FPAP made profits on the futures markets which were then passed on completely to the fisheries undertakings.
Ta formula upošteva predpostavko, da je FPAP ustvaril dobiček na terminskih trgih, ki ga je nato prenesel na ribiška podjetja.
As described in this Decision, that is the most plausible case.
Kot je opisano v tej odločbi, je to najverjetnejši primer.
However, consideration should also be given to the theoretical case in which the FPAP made losses on the futures markets, with the result that the fisheries undertakings would have received an overall amount of allowances lower than the amount of the advances less the amount to be recovered from the FPAP.
Vendar je treba predvideti tudi teoretični primer, ko bi FPAP imel izgubo na terminskih trgih in bi to povzročilo, da bi bila ribiška podjetja upravičena do skupnega zneska nadomestil, nižjega od zneska predplačil, zmanjšanega za znesek, ki ga mora vrniti FPAP.
In such a case, the quotient (Advances – R*FPAP)/Total I would generally be greater than 1, in particular if the amount ‘R*FPAP’ is small. Application of the above formula would therefore mean that the overall amount to be recovered from the fisheries undertakings would be higher than that which they received.
V takem primeru bi bil koeficient (Predplačila – R*FPAP)/Skupaj I na splošno večji od 1, zlasti če je znesek „R*FPAP“ majhen; posledica uporabe zgornje formule bi bila, da bi bil skupni znesek, ki ga morajo vrniti ribiška podjetja, višji od zneska, ki so ga prejela.
For that reason, in this particular case, the amount to be recovered from each undertaking should be the amount of the allowance received by the undertaking under the ‘diesel insurance’.
Zato je treba v tem posebnem primeru predvideti, da znesek, ki ga mora vrniti vsako podjetje, ustreza znesku nadomestila, ki ga je to podjetje prejelo iz naslova „zavarovanja za gorivo“.
In this particular case, the balance of the State advances and the allowances paid to the fisheries undertakings would have to be recovered from the FPAP, which would actually have retained that difference.
V tem primeru bi moral razliko med državnimi predplačili in nadomestilom, izplačanim ribiškim podjetjem, vrniti FPAP, ki bi dejansko porabil to razliko.
State aid for the fisheries undertakings cannot be made subject to recovery if, on the date on which it was granted, it meets the conditions of Regulation (EC) No 1860/2004 or Regulation (EC) No 875/2007 on de minimis aid,
Če je na datum, ko je bila državna pomoč podeljena, izpolnjevala pogoje iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1860/2004 ali Uredbe (ES) št. 875/2007 o pomočeh de minimis, obstaja možnost, da pomoči, ki so jo prejela ribiška podjetja, ni treba vrniti –
The aid granted to the Fund for the prevention of risks to fishing (FPAP) for the acquisition of financial options on the oil futures market and implemented unlawfully by France in breach of Article 88(3) of the Treaty is incompatible with the common market.
Pomoč, ki jo je Francija podelila Skladu za preprečevanje tveganj ribištva (FPAP) za nakup finančnih opcij na naftnih terminskih trgih in jo v nasprotju s členom 88(3) Pogodbe nezakonito izvedla, je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
The aid granted to fisheries undertakings in the form of a reduction of their fuel expenditure and unlawfully granted by France in breach of Article 88(3) of the Treaty is incompatible with the common market.
Pomoč, ki jo je Francija podelila ribiškim podjetjem v obliki zmanjšanja njihovih izdatkov za gorivo in jo nezakonito izvedla v nasprotju s členom 88(3) Pogodbe, je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
Individual aid granted to a fisheries undertaking under Article 2(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 994/98 [35] shall not be subject to recovery if, at the time it is granted, it meets the conditions laid down by the regulation adopted under Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 994/98 applicable at the time the aid was granted.Article 4
Individualne pomoči, podeljene ribiškemu podjetju na podlagi člena 2(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 994/98 [35], ni treba vrniti, če je ob njeni podelitvi podjetje izpolnjevalo pogoje, določene v Uredbi, sprejeti na podlagi člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 994/98, ki je veljala ob podelitvi pomoči.Člen 4
France shall recover the incompatible aid referred to in Articles 1 and 2 from the beneficiaries.
Francija mora od prejemnikov dobiti nezdružljivo pomoč iz členov 1 in 2.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were placed at the disposal of the beneficiaries until their actual recovery.
Za zneske, ki jih je treba vrniti, začnejo teči zamudne obresti od dneva, ko so bili dani na voljo prejemnikom, do dneva njihovega dejanskega vračila.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [36].
Obresti se izračunajo z uporabo obrestnoobrestnega računa v skladu s Poglavjem V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 [36].
France shall cancel all outstanding payments of the aid referred to in Articles 1 and 2 with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Francija razveljavi vsa čakajoča izplačila pomoči iz členov 1 in 2 od datuma sprejetja te odločbe.
Recovery of the aid referred to in Articles 1 and 2 shall be immediate and effective.
Vračilo pomoči iz členov 1 in 2 je takojšnje in učinkovito.
France shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months of the date of its notification.
Francija zagotovi, da se ta odločba izvede v štirih mesecih od datuma, ko je bila o njej uradno obveščeno.
Within two months of notification of this Decision, France shall submit the following information to the Commission:
V dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tej odločbi Francija pošlje Komisiji naslednje informacije:
the total amount (principal and recovery interests) to be recovered from the FPAP;
skupni znesek (glavnica in obresti), ki ga mora vrniti FPAP;
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision;
podroben opis že sprejetih ali predvidenih ukrepov za uskladitev s to odločbo;
documents demonstrating that the FPAP has been ordered to repay the aid.
dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da je bil FPAP pozvan k vračilu pomoči.
France shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 has been completed.
Francija obvešča Komisijo o napredku glede nacionalnih ukrepov, sprejetih za izvršitev te odločbe, dokler pomoč iz člena 1 ni vrnjena v celoti.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Francija na zahtevo Komisije nemudoma predloži informacije o že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepih za izvajanje te odločbe.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the FPAP.
Francija predloži tudi podrobne informacije o višini pomoči in obrestih, ki jih je FPAP že vrnil.
a list of fisheries undertakings that have received aid as referred to in Article 2 and the total amount of aid received by each of them;
seznam ribiških podjetij, ki so prejela pomoč iz člena 2, in skupni znesek, ki ga je prejelo vsako od teh podjetij;
the total amount (principal and recovery interests) to be recovered from each beneficiary;
skupni znesek (glavnica in obresti), ki ga mora vrniti vsak prejemnik;
documents demonstrating that the beneficiaries have been ordered to repay the aid.
dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da so bili prejemniki pozvani k vračilu pomoči.
France shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 2 has been completed.
Francija obvešča Komisijo o napredku glede nacionalnih ukrepov, sprejetih za izvršitev te odločbe, dokler pomoč iz člena 2 ni vrnjena v celoti.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiaries.
Francija predloži tudi podrobne informacije o višini pomoči in obrestih, ki so jih prejemniki že vrnili.
OJ C 91, 19.4.2006, p. 30.
UL C 91, 19.4.2006, str. 30.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-160/91 AGF-Cancava [1993] ECR I-637.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 17. februarja 1993 v združenih zadevah AGF-Cancava, C-159/91 in C-160/91, Recueil, str. I-637.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-222/04 Cassa di Risparmio [2006] ECR I-289.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 10. januarja 2006 v zadevi Cassa di Risparmio, C-222/04, ZOdl., str. I-289.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-342/96 Spain v Commission [1999] ECR I-2459; judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-256/97 DMTransports [1999] ECR I-3913; judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-152/99 Andrès Molina [2002] ECR II-3049.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 29. aprila 1999 v zadevi Španija proti Komisiji, C-342/96, Recueil, str. I-2459; sodba Sodišča z dne 29. junija 1999 v zadevi DMTransports, C-256/97, Recueil, str. I-3913.; sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 11. julija 2002 v zadevi Andrès Molina, T-152/99, Recueil, str. II-3049.
OJ C 307, 17.12.2003, p. 11.
UL C 307, 17.12.2003, str. 11.
OJ C 220, 8.9.2005, p. 2.
UL C 220, 8.9.2005, str. 2.
Contrary to what appeared in the Decision initiating the formal investigation procedure, vessels in this category (more than 12 metres) do not account for 95,3 % of FPAP member vessels.
V nasprotju z navedbami v odločbi o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave plovila te kategorije (nad 12 metrov) ne pomenijo 95,3-odstotnega deleža plovil članov Sklada za preprečevanje tveganj ribištva.
In fact they account for 95,3 % of the vessels in this category which are covered by the FPAP.
Dejansko gre za 95,3 % plovil te kategorije, ki jih krije Sklad za preprečevanje tveganj ribištva.
Coulon: The new business bank debt ratios, BANQUE No 511, December 1990, quoted by Alain Galesnes in ‘Le diagnostic bancaire de l’entreprise (Business banking diagnostics)’ in Editions du Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Financières appliquées (CEREFIA), Rennes, 1994/2004.
COULON Nova bančna razmerja pri zadolžitvi podjetij BANQUE št. 511, december 1990, ki ga navaja Alain Galesnes v „Le diagnostic bancaire de l’entreprise“ in Editions du Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Financières appliquées (CEREFIA) Rennes, 1994/2004.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-482/99 France v Commission [2002] ECR I-4397, in particular paragraphs 53 to 56.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 16. maja 2002 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji, C-482/99, Recueil, str. I-4397, zlasti točke od 53 do 56.
This is the threshold ultimately laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 875/2007 (see footnote 14).
Ta prag je bil nazadnje sprejet v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 875/2007 (glej opombo 14).
Source: Observatoire économique régional des pêches de Bretagne.
Vir: Observatoire économique régional des pêches de Bretagne.
‘Résultats des flottilles artisanales 2005/2006’ (Regional economic observatory of fisheries in Brittany, ‘Results for craft fleets 2005/2006’), Summary.
„Résultats des flottilles artisanales 2005/2006“. Note de synthèse (povzetek).
The references to Parts 3.1 and 3.2 refer to the Decision initiating the formal investigation procedure mentioned in recital 11.
Napotila na dela 3.1 in 3.2 se sklicujejo na odločbo o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave, navedeno v uvodni izjavi 11.
Part 3.1 dealt with the aid for the acquisition of options on the futures markets and the resultant financial advantages for the FPAP and the fisheries undertakings; Part 3.2 dealt with the compensation for the purchase of fuel for those undertakings.
Del 3.1 je obravnaval pomoč za pridobitev opcij na terminskih trgih in finančne ugodnosti za Sklad za preprečevanje tveganj ribištva in ribolovna podjetja; del 3.2 je obravnaval nadomestila za nakup goriva za ta ista podjetja.
In particular: judgments of the Court of Justice in Case 173/73 Italy v Commission [1974] ECR 709; in Case C-241/94 France v Commission (known as ‘Kimberly Clark’) [1996] ECR I-4551; in Case C-480/98 Spain v Commission [2000] ECR I-8717; and in Case C-5/01 Belgium v Commission [2002] ECR I-11991.
Zlasti: sodbe Sodišča z dne 2. julija 1974 v zadevi Italija proti Komisiji, 173/73, Recueil, str. 709; z dne 26. septembra 1996 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji, imenovana „Kimberly Clark“, C-241/94, Recueil, str. I-4551; z dne 12. oktobra 2000 v zadevi Španija proti Komisiji, C-480/98, Recueil, str. I-8717; in z dne 12. decembra 2002 v zadevi Belgija proti Komisiji, C-5/01, Recueil, str. I-11991.
See paragraph II of the speech by Mr D. Bussereau, the Minister for Agriculture and Fisheries, delivered on 30 June 2005 at the general meeting of the Comité national des pêches maritimes et des élevages marins, which can be found at the following Internet address: http://agriculture.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/discours_300605_ag-cnpm.pdf.
Glej odstavek II razprave D. Bussereauja, ministra za kmetijstvo in ribištvo, dne 30. junija 2005 na generalni skupščini Nacionalnega odbora za pomorsko ribištvo in ribogojstvo, dokument je na voljo na spletni strani: http://agriculture.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/discours_300605_ag-cnpm.pdf
OJ L 99, 7.4.2006, p. 21.
UL L 99, 7.4.2006, str. 21.
COM(2007) 73 final.
COM(2007) 73 konč.
Source: Ofimer, Les chiffres-clés de la filière pêche et aquaculture en France (Key figures for fishing and aquaculture in France), 2006 edition.
Vir: OFIMER, Les chiffres-clés de la filière pêche et aquaculture en France (Ključne številke o ribiški in ribogojski industriji v Franciji), izdaja 2006.
Also, Eurostat and Global Trade Information Service.
Tudi Eurostat in Global Trade Information Service.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-241/95 Het Vlaamse Gewest v Commission [1998] ECR II-717, paragraph 67.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 30. aprila 1998 v zadevi Het Vlaamse Gewest proti Komisiji, T-241/95, Recueil, str. II-717, točka 67.
National parliament — Minutes of the session of 25 October 2006, hearing of Mr Dominique Bussereau, Minister for Agriculture and Fisheries.
Nacionalna skupščina – Zapisnik zasedanja 25. oktobra 2006, zaslišanje ministra za kmetijstvo in ribištvo Dominiqua Bussereauja.
COM(2006) 103 final.
COM(2006) 103 konč.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-251/97 French Republic v Commission [1999] ECR I-6639, paragraph 35.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 5. oktobra 1999 v zadevi Francoska republika proti Komisiji, C-251/97, Recueil, str. I-6639, točka 35.
Judgment of the Rennes Court of Appeal of 16 June 1998Marziou v Louzaouen, in Le Droit Maritime Français, No 588, December 1998, p. 1201 et seq.
Sodba Pritožbenega sodišča v Rennesu z dne 16. junija 1998 v zadevi Marziou proti Louzaouenu, v Le Droit Maritime Français, št. 588, december 1998, str. 1201 in naslednje (iz.
Available at www.legifrance.gouv.fr/
Na voljo na www.legifrance.gouv.fr/.
Official bulletin of the Ministry of Infrastructure No 13 of 25 July 2003, available at www2.equipement.gouv.fr/bulletinofficiel/fiches/BO200313/Une.htm
Uradni bilten ministrstva za promet št. 13 z dne 25. julija 2003, na voljo na www2.equipement.gouv.fr/bulletinofficiel/fiches/BO200313/Une.htm.
Published in the Journal officiel de la République française 203 of 3 September 2003, p. 15051.
Objavljeno v Journal officiel de la République française št. 203 z dne 3. septembra 2003, str. 15051.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-277/00 Germany v Commission [2004] ECR I-3925, paragraph 75.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 29. aprila 2004 v zadevi Nemčija proti Komisiji, C-277/00, Recueil, str. I-3925, točka 75.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-480/98 Spain v Commission [2000] ECR I-8715, paragraph 25.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 12. oktobra 2000 v zadevi Španija proti Komisiji, C-480/98, Recueil, str. I-8715, točka 25.
Under Article 2 of the agreement of 12 November 2004, ‘the purpose of the advance shall be the setting up of a cover mechanism against fluctuations in international oil prices from 1 November 2004; the advance will enable financial options to be acquired on futures markets.
V skladu s členom 2 sporazuma z dne 12. novembra 2004 je „gotovinsko predplačilo namenjeno vzpostavitvi mehanizma kritja za nihanja mednarodnih cen nafte od 1. novembra 2004; to predplačilo bo omogočilo pridobitev opcij na terminskem trgu.
The compensation paid to members of the Fund shall correspond to the difference in price between the maximum price covered and the average monthly price in the reference index for the month under consideration’.
Nadomestila, ki se izplačajo članu sklada, morajo ustrezati razliki med najvišjo ceno, vključeno v kritje, in povprečno mesečno ceno referenčnega indeksa za zadevni mesec“.
In addition, the FPAP disputes the claim that it enjoyed preferential conditions for carrying out its activity as investor on the futures market — in its own words: ‘the FPAP operated on the world commodities market with specialised brokers or financial institutions (…) [It] did not enjoy any tariff advantage, nor any special conditions vis-à-vis all the other operators on the market’.
FPAP poleg tega izpodbija dejstvo, da je bil deležen ugodnih pogojev za izvajanje svoje dejavnosti vlagatelja na terminskem trgu. In sicer navaja, da „je sklad posredoval na blagovni borzi v povezavi s posredniki ali specializiranimi finančnimi ustanovami (…) (Sklad) ni bil deležen nobene tarifne ugodnost niti posebnih pogojev do drugih subjektov na trgu“.