natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
By Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005, the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports into the Community of castings of non-malleable cast iron of a kind used to cover and/or give access to ground or sub-surface systems, and parts thereof, whether or not machined, coated or painted or fitted with other materials, excluding fire hydrants, originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’) (‘the product concerned’), normally declared within CN codes 73251050, 73251092 and ex73251099 (TARIC code 7325109910).
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1212/2005 je Svet uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz ulitkov iz netempranega litega železa, ki se uporabljajo za pokritje in/ali dostop do površinskih ali podpovršinskih sistemov in njihovih delov, so strojno obdelani ali ne, so premazani ali prevlečeni ali obdelani z drugimi vrstami materiala, razen požarnih hidrantov, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („zadevni izdelek“), trenutno uvrščenih pod oznakami KN 73251050, 73251092 in ex73251099 (oznaka Taric 7325109910), v Skupnost.
Given the large number of cooperating parties, a sample of Chinese exporting producers was selected during the investigation which led to the imposition of the measures.
Zaradi velikega števila sodelujočih strank je bil med preiskavo, ki je privedla do uvedbe ukrepov, izbran vzorec kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
The sampled companies were attributed the individual duty rates established during the investigation.
Vzorčenim družbam so bile dodeljene med preiskavo ugotovljene individualne stopnje dajatve.
The cooperating non-sampled companies which were granted market economy treatment (‘MET’), in accordance with the provisions of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, were attributed the 0 % dumping duty which was established for the sole sampled company which was granted MET.
Za nevzorčene družbe, ki jim je bila odobrena tržnogospodarska obravnava („TGO“) v skladu z določbami člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, je bila uporabljena 0 % dampinška dajatev, ki je bila določena za edino vzorčeno družbo z odobrenim TGO.
The cooperating non-sampled companies which were granted individual treatment (‘IT’), in accordance with the provisions of Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation, received the weighted average duty of 28,6 % established for the sampled companies that were granted IT.
Za sodelujoče nevzorčene družbe, ki jim je bila odobrena individualna obravnava („IO“) v skladu z določbami člena 9(5) osnovne uredbe, se uporablja tehtano povprečje dajatve v višini 28,6 %, določeno za vzorčene družbe, ki jim je bil odobren IO.
A countrywide duty of 47,8 % was imposed on all other companies.
Za vse druge družbe je bila uvedena dajatev na ravni države v višini 47,8 %.
Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005 gives the possibility to Chinese exporting producers which meet the four criteria set out in that Article to be granted the same treatment as the one mentioned in recital (2) above for the cooperating companies not included in the sample (‘New Exporting Producer Treatment’ or ‘NEPT’).
Člen 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1212/2005 kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki so izpolnili štiri merila iz navedenega člena, omogoča, da se jih obravnava enako kot družbe iz uvodne izjave 2 o sodelujočih družbah, ki niso vključene v vzorec („status novega proizvajalca izvoznika“ ali „SNPI“).
Nine companies have requested to be granted NEPT.
Odobritev SNPI je zahtevalo devet družb.
An examination has been carried out to determine whether each of the applicants fulfils the criteria for being granted NEPT as set out in Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005, by verifying that:
Za ugotovitev, ali vsi vložniki izpolnjujejo merila za odobritev SNPI iz člena 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1212/2005, je bilo s preiskavo preverjeno, da:
it did not export to the Community the products described in recital (1) above during the investigation period (1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004);
v obdobju preiskave (od 1. aprila 2003 do 31. marca 2004) v Skupnost niso izvažali izdelkov, navedenih v uvodni izjavi 1;
it is not related to any of the exporters or producers in the People’s Republic of China which are subject to the anti-dumping measures imposed by that Regulation;
niso povezani s katerim koli izvoznikom ali proizvajalcem v Ljudski republiki Kitajski, za katerega veljajo protidampinški ukrepi, uvedeni s to uredbo;
it has actually exported to the Community the products concerned after the investigation period on which the measures are based, or it has entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export a significant quantity to the Community;
so dejansko izvažali zadevne izdelke v Skupnost po obdobju preiskave, na katerem temeljijo ukrepi, ali so sklenili nepreklicno pogodbeno obveznost o izvozu znatne količine v Skupnost;
it operates under market economy conditions defined in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation or alternatively that it fulfils the requirements to have an individual duty in accordance with Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
delujejo pod pogoji tržnega gospodarstva, opredeljenimi v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe ali izpolnjujejo zahteve za individualno dajatev v skladu s členom 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
Since the fourth criterion implies that the applicants submit a claim for MET or IT, the Commission sent MET and IT claim forms to all Chinese applicants.
Ker četrto merilo določa, da vložniki predložijo zahtevek za TGO ali IO, je Komisija poslala obrazce za zahtevka TGO in IO vsem kitajskim vložnikom.
All Chinese applicant companies requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe so vsi kitajski vložniki zahtevali TGO.
business decisions and costs are made in response to market signals and without significant State interference; and costs of major inputs substantially reflect market values;
poslovne odločitve in stroški so izvedeni kot odgovor na tržne signale in brez večjega vmešavanja države; stroški večjih vlaganj v glavnem odražajo tržne vrednosti;
firms have one clear set of basic accounting records which are independently audited in line with international accounting standards [3] and are applied for all purposes;
podjetja imajo jasno določeno zbirko računovodskih evidenc, ki se pregledujejo neodvisno v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi [3] in se uporabljajo v vse namene;
exchange-rate conversions are carried out at market rates.
pretvorbe deviznih tečajev se opravljajo po tržnih stopnjah.
Questionnaires were sent to all applicants who were asked to supply evidence to demonstrate that they met the criteria mentioned above.
Vsem vložnikom je bil poslan vprašalnik, obenem pa so bili zaprošeni, da predložijo dokaze o izpolnjevanju zgoraj navedenih meril.
Exporting producers fulfilling these criteria may be granted the duty rate applicable to the cooperating companies not included in the sample, pursuant to Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005.
Proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki so izpolnili ta merila, se lahko v skladu s členom 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1212/2005 odobri stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec.
One Chinese company requesting NEPT did not submit any reply to the questionnaire and one company did not submit any reply to a deficiency letter of their questionnaire reply.
Ena kitajska družba, ki je zahtevala SNPI, ni izpolnila vprašalnika, ena družba pa ni odgovorila na pismo o pomanjkljivostih v njenem izpolnjenem vprašalniku.
It was therefore not possible to verify whether these companies fulfilled the criteria set out in Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005 and their request had to be rejected.
Zato ni bilo mogoče preveriti, ali so te družbe izpolnile merila iz člena 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1212/2005, njihov zahtevek pa je bilo treba zavrniti.
Seven companies submitted complete replies to the questionnaires.
Sedem družb je predložilo v celoti izpolnjene vprašalnike.
The Commission sought and verified all information it deemed necessary for the purpose of the determination of the fourth criterion (MET/IT) set out in Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005.
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, potrebne za določitev četrtega merila (TGO/IO) iz člena 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1212/2005.
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the seven following companies:
Preveritveni obiski so bili opravljeni v prostorih naslednjih sedmih družb:
Wuxi Norlong Foundry Co. Ltd (Wuxi New District, Jiangsu) (‘Norlong’),
Wuxi Norlong Foundry Co., Ltd. (Wuxi New District, Jiangsu) („Norlong“),
Baoding City Maikesaier Casting Ltd (Xinanli, Hebei) (‘Maikesaier’),
Baoding City Maikesaier Casting Ltd. (Xinanli, Hebei) („Maikesaier“),
XianXian Guozhuang Precision Casting Co. Ltd (Guozhuang, Hebei) (‘XianXian’),
XianXian Guozhuang Precision Casting Co., Ltd. (Gouzhuang, Hebei) („XianXian“),
Changsha Wuxing Foundry Co. Ltd (Wangcheng County, Changsha) (‘Wuxing’) and related company Changsha J & J Sunshine Machinery and Electronic Co. Ltd (189 Wuyi Road, Changsha) (‘Sunshine’),
Changsha Wuxing Foundry Co., Ltd. (Wangcheng County, Changsha) („Wuxing“) ter povezana družba Changsha J & J Sunshine Machinery and Electronic Co., Ltd (189 Wuyi Road, Changsha) („Sunshine“),
Baoding Yuehai Machine Manufacturing Co. Ltd (Baoding, Hebei) (‘Yuehai’),
Baoding Yuehai Machine Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (Baoding, Hebei) („Yuehai“),
HanDan County Yan Yuan Smelting and Casting Co. Ltd (Han Dan County, Hebei) (‘Yan Yuan’),
HanDan County Yan Yuan Smelting and Casting Co., Ltd. (Han Dan County, Hebei) („Yan Yuan“),
Tianjin Loiselet Art Casting Co. Ltd (Jinghai, Tianjin) (‘Loiselet’).
Tianjin Loiselet Art Casting Co., Ltd. (Jinghai, Tianjin) („Loiselet“).
For each of the seven companies visited, it was verified whether the four criteria mentioned at recital (5) above were met.
Za vsako od sedmih obiskanih družb je bilo preverjeno, ali so bila sprejeta štiri merila iz uvodne izjave 5.
For two Chinese exporting producers, Maikesaier and Yuehai, the examination of the information submitted showed that they had provided sufficient evidence to prove that they meet the four criteria set out in Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005 and, concerning the last criterion, that they meet the five conditions for MET.
Za dva kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika, Maikesaier in Yuehai, je preiskava predloženih podatkov pokazala, da v zadostni meri izpolnjujeta merila iz člena 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1212/2005 in da glede na zadnje merilo izpolnjujeta pet pogojev za TGO.
Therefore, these two producers can be granted the weighted average duty rate for companies granted MET applicable to the cooperating companies not included in the sample (i.e. 0 %) in accordance with Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005 and be added to the list of exporting producers of Article 1(2) of that Regulation.
Zato se tema dvema proizvajalcema odobri tehtano povprečje stopnje dajatve za družbe, za katere je bil odobren TGO, ki se uporablja za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec (tj. 0 %), v skladu s členom 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1212/2005, in se lahko dodata v seznam proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz člena 1(2) navedene uredbe.
Four Chinese exporting producers, Norlong, XianXian, Yan Yuan and Loiselet provided sufficient evidence to prove that they meet the four criteria set out in Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005.
Štirje kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, Norlong, XianXian, Yan Yuan in Loiselet, so predložili zadostne dokaze o izpolnjevanju teh štirih meril, določenih v členu 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1212/2005.
However, concerning the last criterion, they could not show that they meet the conditions to be granted MET.
Vendar pa glede zadnjega merila niso mogli dokazati, da izpolnjujejo pogoje za odobritev TGO.
For Norlong it was found that it had received a substantial public land-use right refund.
Za družbo Norlong je bilo ugotovljeno, da je prejela znatno povračilo stroškov za pravico do uporabe javnih zemljišč.
Criterion 3 for MET was therefore not considered to be fulfilled.
Merilo 3 za TGO se tako ne šteje za izpolnjeno.
It was also concluded that in the light of the fact that criterion 3 could not be met, a final determination concerning criterion 1 could not be made.
Prav tako je bilo glede na dejstvo, da merila 3 ni mogoče izpolniti, sklenjeno, da končne določitve glede merila 1 ni mogoče oblikovati.
However, no evidence was found that this company did not fulfil the five criteria for IT.
Vendar ni bilo dokazov, da ta družba ne izpolnjuje petih meril za IO.
For XianXian it was found that it could not fulfil criteria 1, 2 and 3 for MET.
Za družbo XianXian je bilo ugotovljeno, da ne izpolnjuje meril 1, 2 in 3 za TGO.
The company did not submit sufficient evidence to show that it operated under market economy conditions and that its costs reflected market values.
Družba ni predložila zadostnih dokazov v potrditev, da je delovala v skladu s pogoji tržnega gospodarstva in da so njeni stroški odražali tržne vrednosti.
Furthermore, the company was found not to have one clear set of accounting standards audited in line with international accounting standards.
Poleg tega družba ni imela jasno določene zbirke računovodskih standardov, pregledanih v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi.
Finally, it was found that the company had obtained land rent contracts at abnormally low prices in both absolute and relative figures.
Nazadnje je bilo ugotovljeno, da je družba pridobila najemne pogodbe po neobičajno nizkih cenah glede na absolutne in relativne vrednosti.
It was found that Yan Yuan did not meet criterion 2 for MET.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da družba Yan Yuan ni izpolnila merila 2 za TGO.
The 2006 accounts of this company had not been audited, contrary to Chinese law and international accounting standards, and other accounting irregularities were also discovered, notably the fact that raw materials were purchased from private individuals, without invoicing.
V nasprotju s kitajskimi zakoni in mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi poslovne knjige za leto 2006 niso bile pregledane, ugotovljene pa so bile tudi druge računovodske nepravilnosti, zlasti dejstvo, da so bile surovine kupljene pri fizičnih osebah brez izdajanja računov.
For Loiselet it was found that criteria 2 and 3 for MET were not met.
Pri družbi Loiselet je bilo ugotovljeno, da nista bili izpolnjeni merili 2 in 3 za TGO.
In particular, it was established that most of the company’s main assets did not appear in the accounts of the company.
Zlasti je bilo ugotovljeno, da večina glavnih sredstev družbe ni navedena v poslovnih knjigah družbe.
It also appeared that rental agreement for the land and buildings of the plant was not respected.
Prav tako se je izkazalo, da se ni spoštovalo najemnih pogodb za zemljišča in stavbe obrata.
In view of the conclusions reached on the accounting practices of XianXian, Yan Yuan and Loiselet, it cannot be concluded that their export prices are reliable enough to be used for an individual dumping margin calculation and therefore it cannot be concluded whether they fulfil the second criterion for IT.
Na podlagi ugotovitev o računovodskih praksah družb XianXian, Yan Yuan in Loiselet ni mogoče sklepati, ali so njihove izvozne cene dovolj zanesljive, da se lahko uporabijo za izračun posamezne stopnje dampinga, in zato ni mogoče sklepati, ali izpolnjujejo drugo merilo za IO.
All other four criteria for IT are met.
Preostala štiri merila za IO so izpolnjena.
However, considering the fact, that their export prices would not be used to calculate the dumping margin, if these three companies fell under the weighted average duty rate of 28,6 % calculated for the sampled companies granted IT in the original investigation, it is concluded that, in the context of this examination, these companies can be granted the same treatment as those falling under the weighted average duty rate.
Vendar se lahko glede na dejstvo, da izvozne cene teh treh družb ne bodo uporabljene za izračun stopnje dampinga, če zanje velja tehtana povprečna stopnja dajatve v višini 28,6 %, ki je izračunana za vzorčene družbe, za katere se odobri IO s prvotno preiskavo, sklene, da se lahko v okviru te proučitve navedene družbe obravnavajo enako kot tiste, za katere velja povprečna stopnja dajatve.
Therefore, Norlong, XianXian, Yan Yuan and Loiselet can be granted the weighted average duty rate for companies granted IT applicable to the cooperating companies not included in the sample (i.e. 28,6 %) in accordance with Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005 and be added to the list of exporting producers of Article 1(2) of that Regulation.
Zato se lahko Norlong, XianXian, Yan Yuan in Loiselet odobri tehtana povprečna stopnja dajatve za družbe, za katere se odobri IO, ki se uporablja za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec (tj. 28,6 %), v skladu s členom 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1212/2005, in se jih doda na seznam proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz člena 1(2) navedene uredbe.
Wuxing was found not to provide sufficient evidence to show to be the producer of the product concerned exported to the EC.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da družba Wuxing ni predložila zadostnih dokazov v potrditev, da je proizvajalec zadevnega izdelka, ki se je izvažal v ES.
Therefore, this producer did not fulfil the third criterion set out in Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005, and its request for NEPT was therefore rejected.
Zato ta proizvajalec ni izpolnil tretjega merila iz člena 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1212/2005 in njegov zahtevek za SNPI je bil zavrnjen.
MODIFICATION OF THE LIST OF COMPANIES BENEFITING FROM INDIVIDUAL DUTY RATES
SPREMEMBA SEZNAMA DRUŽB, ZA KATERE VELJAJO INDIVIDUALNE STOPNJE DAJATVE
In consideration of the findings of the investigation as indicated in recital (13) above, it is concluded that the companies Maikesaier and Yuehai should be added to the list of individual companies mentioned under Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005 with a duty rate of 0 %.
Glede na ugotovitve preiskave iz uvodne izjave 13 se ugotavlja, da je treba družbi Maikesaier in Yuehai dodati v seznam posameznih družb s stopnjo dajatve 0 % iz člena 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1212/2005.
For the companies Norlong, XianXian, Yan Yuan and Loiselet, based on the findings of the investigation indicated in recitals (14) to (20) above, it is concluded that these four companies should be added to the list of individual companies mentioned under Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005 with a duty rate of 28,6 %.
Za družbe Norlong, XianXian, Yan Yuan in Loiselet se glede na ugotovitve preiskave iz uvodnih izjav 14 do 20 ugotavlja, da je treba te štiri družbe dodati v seznam posameznih družb s stopnjo dajatve 28,6 % iz člena 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1212/2005.
The company Wuxing, considering the findings of the investigation as indicated in recital (21) above, cannot be granted NEPT and should therefore remain subject to the residual duty of 47,8 % according to Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005.
Glede na ugotovitve preiskave iz uvodne izjave 21 se ugotavlja, da družbi Wuxing ni mogoče odobriti SNPI in zanjo velja preostala dajatev v višini 47,8 % iz člena 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1212/2005.
All the applicants and the community industry have been informed of the findings of the investigation and have had the opportunity to submit their comments.
Vložniki in industrija Skupnosti so bili obveščeni o ugotovitvah preiskave in so imeli možnost predložiti svoje pripombe.
Following disclosure, comments were received from Norlong, XianXian and Loiselet.
Po razkritju so pripombe posredovale družbe Norlong, XianXian in Loiselet.
No additional information was brought forward permitting to lead to any different conclusions for any of the three companies,
Nobena od treh družb ni posredovala dodatnih informacij, ki bi lahko privedle do kakršnih koli drugačnih ugotovitev –
Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1212/2005 shall be replaced by the following:
Člen 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1212/2005 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, for products described in paragraph 1 and produced in the People’s Republic of China by the companies listed below shall be as follows:
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, ki velja za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti, neocarinjeno, za izdelke, opisane v odstavku 1, ki jih spodaj navedene družbe proizvajajo v Ljudski republiki Kitajski, je:
Hebei Province, 051430 PRC
Hebei Province, 051430 LRK
Hebei, Baoding 072350, PRC
Hebei, Baoding 072350, LRK
Baoding, Hebei, PRC
Baoding, Hebei, LRK
No 8 DiZangAn, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030002, PRC
8 DiZangAn, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030002, LRK
Hebei, Gouzhuang, PRC
Hebei, Gouzhuang, LRK
Jiangsu, PRC
Jiangsu, LRK
Han Dan County, Hebei, PRC
Han Dan County, Hebei, LRK
Jinghai, Tianjin, PRC
Jinghai, Tianjin, LRK
074200, PRC
074200, LRK
Laiwu City, Shandong Province, 271114, PRC
Laiwu City, Shandong Province, 271114, LRK
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 268/2006 (OJ L 47, 17.2.2006, p. 3).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 268/2006 (UL L 47, 17.2.2006, str. 3).
International accounting standards refer to all major recognised international standards of accounting, including US GAAP and the works of the International Accounting Standard Committee Foundation (‘IASCF’) effectuated by the International Accounting Standards Board ( ‘IASB’), covering the International Accounting Standard Board Framework ( ‘IASBF’), the International Accounting Standard ( ‘IAS’), the International Financial Reporting Standards ( ‘IFRS’) and the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee publications ( ‘IFRIC’).
Mednarodni računovodski standardi se nanašajo na vse pomembnejše priznane mednarodne računovodske standarde, vključno z ameriškimi splošno sprejetimi računovodskimi načeli (US GAAP) in deli Fundacije Odbora za mednarodne računovodske standarde (FOMRS), ki jih izvede Uprava za mednarodne računovodske standarde (IASB), v katero sodijo okvir Uprave za mednarodne računovodske standarde (IASBF), mednarodni računovodski standard (MRS), mednarodni standardi računovodskega poročanja (MSRP) in objave Odbora za pojasnjevanje mednarodnih standardov računovodskega poročanja (OPMSRP).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 427/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 427/2008
This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 May 2008.
Ta uredba začne veljati 17. maja 2008.
Done at Brussels, 16 May 2008.
V Bruslju, 16. maja 2008
to Commission Regulation of 16 May 2008 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 16. maja 2008 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 428/2008
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 428/2008
on determining the intervention centres for cereals
o določitvi intervencijskih centrov za žita
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals [1], and in particular Article 6 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1784/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003 o skupni tržni ureditvi za žita [1] in zlasti člena 6 uredbe,
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2273/93 of 28 July 1993 on determining the intervention centres for cereals [2] has been substantially amended several times [3].
Uredba Komisije (EGS) št. 2273/93 z dne 28. julija 1993 o določitvi intervencijskih centrov za žita [2] je bila večkrat [3] bistveno spremenjena.
To ensure the proper working of the intervention system, the selection of intervention centres should be based on a geographical location and storage facilities which allow the assembly and disposal of substantial quantities of cereals.
Izbira intervencijskih centrov za zagotovitev pravilnega delovanja intervencijskega sistema bi morala temeljiti na geografski danosti in razpoložljivih kapacitetah skladiščenja, ki omogočajo zbiranje in odpremo večjih količin žit.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,
Ukrepi, ki jih določa ta uredba, so v skladu z mnenjem Upravljalnega odbora za žita –