natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Moreover State aids must comply with the Community's international obligations, which in the case of agriculture are specified in the Agreement on Agriculture (WTO-GATT 1994).
Poleg navedenega mora državna pomoč spoštovati mednarodne obveznosti Evropske skupnosti, ki jih za kmetijski sektor vsebuje sporazum o kmetijstvu OMC-GATT iz leta 1994.
In order to satisfy the negative criteria, according to point 3.1 of the applicable advertising Guidelines, the aid must not be granted for campaigns contrary to Article 28 of the Treaty (point 3.1.1), or for campaigns which contravene secondary Community legislation (3.1.2), or for advertising related to particular firms (3.1.3).
Da bi zadostili negativnim kriterijem, ni dovoljeno odobriti pomoč, skladno z oddelkom 3.1 usmeritev o oglaševanju, za oglaševalske akcije, ki kršijo člen 28 Pogodbe ES (oddelek 3.1.1), ali tiste, ki so v nasprotju s sekundarno zakonodajo Skupnosti (oddelek 3.1.2) ali oglaševanje določenih podjetij (oddelek 3.1.3).
Moreover where the conduct of publicly financed advertising activities is entrusted to private firms, in order to exclude the possibility of aid to the firms carrying out the campaigns, the choice of the private firm concerned must be made on market principles, in a non-discriminative way, where necessary using tendering procedures which are in accordance with Community law, and in particular with case-law using a degree of advertising sufficient to enable the services market to be opened up to competition and the impartiality of procurement procedures to be reviewed.
Ko se izvajanje oglaševalskih akcij, podprtih z javnimi finančnimi sredstvi, podeli zasebnim podjetjem, poteka izbira takega podjetja na podlagi tržnih zakonitosti, brez diskriminacije, če je potrebno tudi z natečajem, ki je v skladu s pravili Skupnosti in z njeno sodno prakso, še zlasti s primernim oglaševanjem takih pobud, tako da ostaja trg storitev odprt za konkurenco in daje možnost vpogleda v postopek in v ugotavljanje njegove nepristranskosti.
On the basis of the information provided, the requirements envisaged by point 3.1.1 (campaigns contrary to Article 28 of the Treaty) and 3.1.3 (advertising related to particular firms) appear to be met by the advertising measures which are described above at recitals 30, 31(c) and 33 of this Decision.
Glede na posredovane informacije so oglaševalski ukrepi, ki so opisani v uvodnih izjavah 30, 31(c) in 33 te odločbe, skladni s kriteriji oddelkov 3.1.1 (oglaševalske akcije, ki kršijo člen 28 Pogodbe) in 3.1.3 (oglaševanje določenih podjetij).
On the other hand, no indication that the requirement indicated at point 3.1.2 (campaigns which contravene secondary Community legislation) is also met was provided by the Italian authorities.
Italijanski organi pa niso podali nobene navedbe o tem, ali je izpolnjen tudi kriterij iz oddelka 3.1.2 (oglaševalske akcije, ki so v nasprotju s sekundarno zakonodajo skupnosti).
Besides satisfying the negative criteria, according to point 3.2 of the applicable advertising Guidelines, advertising aids should satisfy at list one of the positive criteria aimed at showing that the aid indeed facilitates the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic areas.
Subvencionirano oglaševanje ne zadošča samo negativnim kriterijem, skladno z oddelkom 3.2 usmeritev o oglaševanju, temveč mora zadostiti najmanj enemu od pozitivnih kriterijev, ki naj bi dokazali, da pomoč dejansko prispeva k razvoju nekaterih gospodarskih dejavnosti ali nekaterih gospodarskih regij.
This positive condition is considered to be met provided that the subsidised advertising concerns any of the following: surplus agricultural products or underexploited species; new products or replacement products not yet in surplus; high-quality products, including products produced or obtained using environmentally friendly production or catchment methods, such as products from organic farming; development of certain regions; development of small and medium sized undertakings (SMEs) as defined by Regulation (EC) No 70/2001; projects that are implemented by organisations officially recognised within the meaning of Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 of 17 December 1999 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products; projects that are jointly implemented by producer organisations or other organisations of the fishery sector recognised by national authorities.
Takemu pozitivnemu pogoju je ugodeno, če zadeva subvencionirano oglaševanje eno naslednjih dejavnosti: presežna kmetijska proizvodnja ali stranski proizvodi; nova ali nadomestna še ne presežna proizvodnja, visoko kakovostni proizvodi, vključno s proizvodi, ki se pridobijo z naravi prijaznimi proizvodnimi postopki ali nabiranjem, kot so ekološko pridelani proizvodi; razvoj nekaterih regij; razvoj malih in srednjih podjetij, kot jih določa Uredba (ES) št. 70/2001; načrti uradno priznanih organizacij v smislu Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 104/2000 z dne 17. decembra 1999 o skupni organizaciji trgov v sektorju za ribištvo in akvakulturo; projekti, ki jih skupaj izpeljejo organizacije proizvajalcev ali druge organizacije za ribištvo, ki so jih priznali državni organi.
With regard to the aids for advertising, the observations submitted by the Italian authorities do not indicate that the advertising measures in question meet any of the above positive criteria.
Pripombe, ki so jih italijanski organi podali v zvezi s pomočjo za oglaševanje, ne vsebujejo podatkov, da zadevni oglaševalski ukrepi zadoščajo enemu gornjih pozitivnih ukrepov.
Regarding the maximum level of State aid for the advertising of agricultural products point 5 of the applicable advertising Guidelines requires that as a general rule, direct aid, from a general purpose government budget, must not exceed the amount which the sector itself has committed to a given advertising campaign.
Sektor 5 usmeritev za oglaševanje kmetijskih proizvodov, ki določa najvišji znesek državne pomoči pravi, da naj načeloma neposredna pomoč iz splošnega proračuna ne presega dodeljenega zneska za določeno oglaševalsko akcijo.
Thus, in the case of aid for advertising, the rate of direct aid should not exceed 50 % and undertakings from the sector will have to contribute at least 50 % of the cost, either through voluntary contributions or through the collection of parafiscal levies or compulsory contributions.
V primeru pomoči za oglaševanje zato delež neposredne pomoči ne sme preseči 50 % in podjetja iz tega sektorja morajo sodelovati pri stroških z najmanj 50 %-nim deležem, s prostovoljnimi prispevki ali z davkom podobnimi dajatvami ali obveznimi dajatvami.
To take account of the weight of some of the positive criteria mentioned in point 3.2 of the advertising Guidelines, the Commission may authorise the raising of the abovementioned maximum rate of direct aid up to 75 % of the costs in the case of advertising for products produced by SMEs in areas eligible for support under Article 87(3)(a) of the Treaty.
Da bi se zavedali pomena nekaterih pozitivnih kriterijev oddelka 3.2 usmeritev za oglaševanje, lahko Komisija odredi zvišanje najvišjega deleža neposredne pomoči, in sicer do višine 75 % stroškov za oglaševanje proizvodov v malih in srednjih podjetjih na področjih, kjer se lahko pomoč izvaja v skladu s členom 87(3)(a) Pogodbe.
On the basis of the information provided and reported above at recital 31 of this Decision, it appears that all the promotional and advertising measures envisaged by the present scheme are financed at the rate of 100 % by public funds.
Iz posredovanih informacij, ki jih vključuje uvodna izjava 31 te odločbe, je razvidno, da se vse promocijske in oglaševalske akcije, ki jih načrtuje shema obravnavane pomoči financirajo 100 % iz javnih virov.
The condition that 50 % (or 25 % where applicable) of the financing must come from the sector is therefore not met.
Pogoju, da naj se financira v višini 50 % (oz. v danem primeru 25 %) iz sektorja, ni zadoščeno.
From the above assessment the Commission can therefore conclude that the advertising aids under examination do not meet the requirements set out at points 3.1.2 (campaigns which contravene secondary Community legislation), 3.2 (positive criteria) and 5 (maximum level of State aid) of the applicable advertising Guidelines.
Iz gornje ocene Komisija lahko sklepa, da pomoč za obravnavano oglaševanje ni skladna s kriteriji oddelka 3.1.2 (oglaševalske akcije, ki so v nasprotju s sekundarno zakonodajo skupnosti), oddelka 3.2 (pozitivni kriteriji) in 5 (najvišja državna pomoč) usmeritev o oglaševanju.
The same conclusion applies to both measures implemented within the Community and outside the Community.
Enaka ugotovitev velja za ukrepe, ki se izvajajo znotraj in zunaj skupnosti.
Since the advertising measures implemented outside the Community are not explicitly covered by the agricultural guidelines, the Commission exercises its powers of discretion in their assessment.
Glede na to, da oglaševanja, ki se izvajajo izven Skupnosti, usmeritve ne obravnavajo posebej, ko govorijo o državni pomoči v kmetijskem sektorju, se Komisija odloča na podlagi diskrecijske pravice, ki jo ima.
According to current Commission practice, where they comply with relevant state aid rules applicable within the Community territory the envisaged measures can be considered compatible with the common market and aid up to 80 % can be authorised.
Glede na stalno prakso Komisija meni, da so obravnavani ukrepi lahko skladni z evropskim trgom, če ustrezajo veljavnim predpisom o državni pomoči, ki se uporabljajo znotraj evropskega prostora, ko se lahko odobri financiranje do višine 80 %.
In the present case as it appears from the information provided and reported above at recitals 31 and 33 of this Decision, the measures implemented within and outside the Community are the same ones and aid is granted at the rate of 100 %.
V primeru stranskih proizvodov se iz prejetih informacij, ki so navedene v uvodnih izjavah 31 in 33 te odločbe lahko sklepa, da so ukrepi, ki veljajo znotraj in zunaj Skupnosti enaki in je odobrena pomoč v višini 100 %.
Therefore also in this case neither the requirements set out at points 3.1.2 (campaigns which contravene secondary Community legislation) and 3.2 (positive criteria) of the applicable advertising Guidelines, nor the maximum level of State aid which is allowed by the Commission are respected.Also these aid measures are therefore incompatible with the common market.
Zato se tudi v tem primeru ne upoštevajo niti kriteriji, ki jih določa oddelek 3.1.2 (oglaševalske akcije, ki so v nasprotju s sekundarno zakonodajo skupnosti) in 3.2 (pozitivni kriteriji) usmeritev o oglaševanju, niti najvišji znesek, ki ga Komisija dopušča kot državno pomoč. Torej tudi zadevna pomoč ni v skladu s skupnim trgom.
This Decision concerns exclusively aid to the agricultural sector for the promotion and advertising of Annex I agricultural products.
Ta sklep zadeva izključno ukrepe pomoči v kmetijskem sektorju za promocijo in oglaševanje kmetijskih proizvodov iz priloge I Pogodbe.
It does not constitute a formal position of the Commission as to whether service providers were selected in accordance with Community public procurement rules and case-law.
Ne predstavlja formalnega stališča Komisije v zvezi z ustreznostjo izbire izvajalcev glede na pravila skupnosti, ki zadevajo javne razpise in glede na zadevno sodno prakso.
The Commission reserves the right to further investigate the issue under the angle of public procurement.
Komisija si pridržuje pravico poglobljene preučitve zadeve v luči predpisov o javnih razpisih.
From the abovementioned considerations, it results that the aid measures for promotion, in so far as they comply with point 13 and with point 14 of the Community Guidelines for State aid to the Agriculture sector, can be considered compatible with the common market in accordance with Article 87(3)(c) as aids to facilitate the development of certain economic activities.
Iz gornjih ugotovitev lahko sklepamo, da je lahko pomoč za promocijo, v kolikor je v skladu z oddelki 13 in 14 usmeritev Skupnosti za državno pomoč pri oglaševanju v kmetijskem sektorju, združljiva s skupnim trgom v smislu člena 87(3)(c), ko gre za pomoč, ki je namenjena pospeševanju nekaterih gospodarskih dejavnosti.
The aid measure for advertising, which do not comply with the rules set out in the Community guidelines for State aid for advertising of products listed in Annex I to the EC Treaty and of certain non-Annex I products, are not compatible with the common market and can be implemented only if they are modified in compliance with the said rules.
Pomoč za oglaševanje, ki ni v skladu z določbami usmeritev o oglaševanju proizvodov iz Priloge I k Pogodbi ES, kot tudi nekaterih proizvodov, ki v prilogo niso vključeni, ni združljiva z evropskim trgom in se lahko izvaja le po predhodnem preoblikovanju in uskladitvi z navedenimi določbami.
The aid measures for advertising which are incompatible with the common market, if granted, must be recovered from the beneficiaries,
Če je odobrena pomoč za oglaševanje, ki ni združljiva z evropskim trgom, se lahko povrne le pri prejemnikih pomoči –
The State aids which Italy has envisaged for the promotion of the agricultural products listed in Annex I to the Treaty on the basis of Article 4 of the Sicilian Regional Law No 27/97 are compatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč, ki jo načrtuje Italija za promocijo kmetijskih proizvodov iz Priloge I k Pogodbi ob uporabi člena 4 deželnega zakona št. 27/1997 dežele Sicilije, je združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The above aids may accordingly be implemented.
Izvrševanje take pomoči se zato odobri.
The State aids which Italy has envisaged for the advertising of the agricultural products listed in Annex I to the Treaty on the basis of Article 4 of the Sicilian Regional Law n. 27/97 are incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč, ki jo načrtuje Italija za oglaševanje kmetijskih proizvodov iz Priloge I k Pogodbi ob uporabi člena 4 deželnega zakona št. 27/1997 dežele Sicilije, ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The above aids may accordingly not be implemented.
Izvrševanje take pomoči se zato ne odobri.
Italy shall take all necessary measures to recover from the beneficiaries the aids referred to in Article 2, if it has unlawfully made them available to the beneficiaries.
Italija sprejme ustrezne ukrepe za vračilo pomoči iz člena 2 od prejemnikov, če jim je protizakonito sredstva že dala na razpolago.
Recovery shall be effected without delay and in accordance with the procedures of national law provided that they allow the immediate and effective execution of the decision.
Vračilo se opravi takoj in ob upoštevanju notranje zakonodaje, pod pogojem, da ta omogoča takojšnje in dejansko izvajanje te odločbe.
The aid to be recovered shall include interest from the date on which it was at the disposal of the beneficiaries until the date of its recovery.
Vračilo vključuje tudi obresti, ki začnejo teči z dnem, ko je bila pomoč dana na razpolago prejemniku/prejemnikom, vse do njenega vračila.
Interest shall be calculated on the basis of the reference rate used for calculating the grant-equivalent of regional aid.
Obresti se obračunajo po stopnji, ki se uporablja za izračun enakovredne subvencije v okviru deželne pomoči.
Italy shall amend its provisions regarding aids for the advertising of Annex I agricultural products in compliance with the Community guidelines for State aid for advertising of products listed in Annex I to the EC Treaty and of certain non-Annex I products.
Italija preoblikuje določbe notranje zakonodaje v zvezi s pomočjo za oglaševanje kmetijskih proizvodov iz Priloge I k Pogodbi, tako da postanejo združljive z usmeritvami Skupnosti za državno pomoč pri oglaševanju proizvodov iz Priloge I k Pogodbe kot tudi nekaterih proizvodov, ki v Prilogi niso zajeti.
Italy shall inform the Commission, within two months of notification of this Decision, of the measures taken to comply with it.
V dveh mesecih od datuma obvestila te odločbe, Italija obvesti Komisijo o sprejetih ukrepih.
Done at Brussels, 2 June 2004.
V Bruslju, 2. junija 2004.
OJ C 48 of 24.2.2004, p. 2.
UL C 48, 24.2.2004, str. 2.
OJ L 83 of 27.3.1999, p. 1.
UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1.
See points 27, 28 and 29 of the Decision in OJ C 48 of 24.2.2004, p. 2.
Glej točke 27, 28 in 29 Odločbe, objavljene v UL C 48, 24.2.2004, str. 2.
OJ C 252 of 12.9.2001, p. 5.
UL C 252, 12.9.2001, str. 5.
Judgement of the Court of justice of 18 November 1999, Case C-107/98, Teckal Srl v Comune di Viano and Azienda Gas-Acqua Consorziale (AGAC) di Reggio Emilia (1999) ECR I-8121.
Razsodba Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 18. novembra 1999, Zadeva C-107/98, Teckal Srl proti Comune di Viano in Azienda Gas-Acqua Consorziale (AGAC) di Reggio Emillia, Recueil 1999 str. I-8121.
Judgement of the Court of justice of 7 December 2000, Case C-324/98, Telaustria Verlags GmbH and Telefonadress GmbH v Telekom Austria AG (2000) ECR I-10745.
Razsodba Sodišča Evropske skupnosti z dne l 7. decembra 2000, Zadeva C-324/98, Teleaustria Verlags GmbH in Telefonadress GmbH proti Telekom Austria AG, Recueil 2000 str. I-10745.
OJ L 10, 13.1.2001, p. 30.
UL L 10, 13.1.2001 str. 30.
OJ C 28 of 1.2.2000, p. 2, rectified in OJ C 232 of 12.8.2000, p. 17.
UL C 28, 1.2.2000, str. 2, popravek v UL C 232, 12.8.2000, str. 17.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 September 1980, Case C-730/79, Philip Morris Holland BV v Commission of the European Communities (1980) ECR 2671, paragraphs 11 and 12.
Razsodba Sodišča Evropske skupnosti z dne l 7. septembra 1980, Zadeva C-730/79, Philip Morris Holland BV proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, Recueil 1980 str. 2671, točki 11 in 12.
According to consistent case law, the condition of the effect on the trade is met since the benefiting company carries out an economic activity which is the subject of trade between the Member States.
Po stalni sodni praksi Sodišča je podan pogoj za kršitev izmenjave tedaj, ko opravlja podjetje, ki je prejelo pomoč, gospodarsko dejavnost, ki je predmet izmenjave med državami članicami.
The simple fact that aid strengthens the position of this company in relation to other competing companies in intra-Community trade, makes it possible to consider that this trade was affected.
Dejstvo, da v izmenjavi med državami članicami pomoč poveča prednost takega podjetja glede na konkurenčna, že samo po sebi navaja, da gre za kršitve v izmenjavi.
With regard to State aids in the agriculture sector it is settled case-law that, even when the overall amount of aid in question is small and it is divided among a large number of farmers, intracommunity trade and competition are affected.
Kar zadeva državno pomoč v kmetijskem sektorju si je sodna praksa edina, da neka pomoč vpliva na izmenjavo med državami članicami in na konkurenco tudi tedaj, ko je njen obseg zelo majhen in se nahaja v množici podjetnikov.
See Judgment of the Court of Justice of 19 September 2002 Case C-113/00, Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (2002) ECR I-7601, paragraphs 30 to 36 and 54 to 56; Judgment of the Court of Justice of 19 September 2002 Case C-114/00, Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (2002) ECR I-7657, paragraphs 46 to 52 and 68 to 69.
Glej Sodbo Zadeva C-113/00, Kraljevina Španija proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, Recueil 2002 str. I-7601, točke 30 do 36 in 54 do 56; Sodba Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 19. septembra 2002 Zadeva C-114/00, Kraljevina Španija proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, Recueil 2002 str. I-7657, točke 46 do 52 in 68 do 69.
Judgement of the Court of Justice of 13 July 1988 in Case 102/87 French Republic v Commission of the European Communities (1988) ECR 4067.
Razsodba sodišča z dne 13. julija 1988 v Zadevi 102/87 Republika Francija proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, Recueil 1988, str. 4067.
OJ L 1 of 3.1.2004, p. 1.
UL L 1, 3.1.2004, str. 1.
As far as the agriculture sector is concerned, promotional and advertising measures implemented outside the EU are not explicitly covered by the agricultural guidelines.
Kar zadeva kmetijski sektor, velja, da pomoč za promocijo in oglaševanje izven Skupnosti ni izrecno predvidena v usmeritvah Skupnosti, ki se uporabljajo za državno pomoč v tem sektorju.
Therefore, the Commission exercises its powers of discretion in their assessment.
Iz tega sledi, da Komisija po ocenitvi odloča po lastnem preudarku.
According to current Commission practice, where the measures envisaged comply with relevant state aid rules applicable within the EU territory, they can be considered compatible with the common market (see for example Italy/Tuscany Aid N 656/02, Aid NN 150/02 (ex N 109/02) (Commission letter C(2003) 1747 of 11.6.2003) and Aid NN 44/03 (ex N 6/03) (Commission letter C(2003) 2534 of 23.7.2003).
Glede na stalno prakso Komisija lahko oceni, če so obravnavani ukrepi skladni z ustreznimi predpisi o državni pomoči, ki se uporabljajo znotraj evropskega prostora, da je pomoč združljiva z evropskim trgom (glej npr. Italija/Toskana, pomoč N 656/02, pomoč NN 150/02 (ex N 109/02) (pismo Komisije C(2003) 1747 z dne 11.6.2003) in pomoč NN 44/03 (ex N 6/03) (pismo Komisije C(2003) 2534 z dne 23.7.2003).
Case C-324/98, already cited.
Zadeva C-324/98, že navedena.
See for example Italy/Tuscany Aid N 656/02, Aid NN 150/02 (ex N 109/02) (Commission letter C(2003) 1747 of 11.6.2003) and Aid NN 44/03 (ex N 6/03) (Commission letter C(2003) 2534 of 23.7.2003).
Glej npr. Italija/Toskana, pomoč N 656/02, pomoč NN 150/02 (ex N 109/02) (pismo Komisije C(2003) 1747 z dne 11.6.2003) in pomoč NN 44/03 (ex N 6/03) (pismo Komisije C(2003) 2534 z dne 23.7.2003).
As indicated in Commission Decision C(2002)1786 fin of 7.5.2002 (Aid N 241/01 — Italy/Chambers of Commerce) the establishment and the enrolment of a European undertaking in the locally competent Chamber of Commerce are not subject to any legal or de facto limitation.
Kot je navedeno v Odločbi Komisije C(2002)1768f konč. z dne 7.5.2002 (Pomoč N 241/01 – Italija/Gospodarske zbornice) obrat nekega evropskega podjetja in njegov vpis v gospodarsko zbornico z lokalno pristojnostjo ni podvrženo nobeni pravni omejitvi ali de facto.
See also Aid N 62/01 (Italy/Union of the Chambers of Commerce of Piemonte and Veneto, Commission Decision SG(2001)D/290914 of 8.8.2001.
Glej tudi pomoč N 62/01 (Italija/Združenje Gospodarskih zbornic Piemonta in Veneta), Odločba Komisije SG(2001) D/290914 z dne 8.8.2001.
Franz Fischler
FranzFischler
concerning the aid scheme that France plans to implement in favour of producers and traders of liqueur wines: Pineau des Charentes, Floc de Gascogne, Pommeau de Normandie and Macvin du Jura
o programu pomoči, ki ga Francija namerava izvajati za proizvajalce in trgovce desertnih vin: Pineau des Charentes, Floc de Gascogne, Pommeau de Normandie in Macvin du Jura
(notified under document number C(2005) 4189)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2005) 4189)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the above provision,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi členi,
By letter dated 23 June 2003, the French Permanent Representation to the European Union notified the Commission under Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty of an aid scheme that it planned to implement in favour of producers and traders of liqueur wines: Pineau des Charentes, Floc de Gascogne, Pommeau de Normandie and Macvin du Jura.
Z dopisom z dne 23. junija 2003 je stalno predstavništvo Francije pri Evropski uniji Komisiji v skladu s členom 88(3) Pogodbe priglasilo program pomoči, ki ga je Francija nameravala izvajati za proizvajalce in trgovce desertnih vin: Pineau des Charentes, Floc de Gascogne, Pommeau de Normandie in Macvin du Jura.
Further information was sent by letters dated 9 August, 24 and 28 November 2003 and 17 and 24 February 2004.
Dodatne informacije so bile poslane z dopisi z dne 9. avgusta, 24. in 28. novembra 2003 ter 17. in 24. februarja 2004.
By letter dated 20 April 2004, the Commission informed France that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid.
Z dopisom z dne 20. aprila 2004 je Komisija sporočila Franciji, da bo sprožila postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES v zvezi s tem ukrepom.