natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
State the nature and value of any movable property (shares, liabilities, capital, etc.) and the address and value of any immovable property (buildings, land, etc.), including non-income-producing property, which you own:
Navedite vrsto in vrednost premičnin (delnice, obveznice, kapital itd.) ter naslov in vrednost nepremičnin (hiše, zemljišča itd.), s katerimi razpolagate, tudi nedonosnih:
OUTGOINGS
C IZDATKI
Complete the following table with details of persons who are dependent on you or who normally live with you (e.g. children):
Izpolnite to tabelo, ki se nanaša na vzdrževane osebe ali osebe, ki živijo z vami v skupnem gospodinjstvu (npr. otroci):
Surname(s) and first name(s)
Priimek in ime
Relationship to you (e.g. son, nephew, mother)
Sorodstvena vez (npr. sin, nečak, mati)
Date of birth (dd / mm / yyyy)
Datum rojstva (dd/mm/llll)
State the amount(s) of any maintenance payments which you make to third parties:
Navedite znesek preživnine, ki jo plačujete tretjim:
State the amount of rent payable on your main residence or the amount of any repayments which you make to banks or other banking institutions under the terms of any loan incurred for the purpose of acquiring your main residence:
Navedite znesek najemnine za nepremičnino, ki jo uporabljate kot svoje stalno prebivališče, ali znesek plačil, ki jih nakazujete bančnim ustanovam iz naslova posojila za nakup nepremičnine, ki je vaše stalno prebivališče:
MISCELLANEOUS
D RAZNO
In the following section you may include any additional information about your circumstances – resources or outgoings (e.g. repayments of loans other than those incurred for the purpose of acquiring your main residence, etc.):
V tej rubriki lahko navedete dodatna pojasnila glede svojega stanja, bodisi glede prihodkov bodisi glede izdatkov (npr. plačila posojil, ki se ne nanašajo na nakup nepremičnine, ki je vaše stalno prebivališče, itd.):
PROPOSED LEGAL REPRESENTATION
PREDLOG ZA DOLOČITEV ODVETNIKA
You may indicate to the Tribunal the name of a lawyer who will represent you, by completing the following section.
Z izpolnitvijo te rubrike lahko Sodišču za uslužbence predlagate ime odvetnika, ki naj bi vas zastopal.
If you do not complete the following section, the Tribunal will invoke the second subparagraph of Article 97(3) of its Rules of Procedure, which provides that the lawyer instructed to represent the applicant is to be designated having regard to the suggestions made by the competent authority of the Member State concerned mentioned in Annex II to the Rules supplementing the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice.
V nasprotnem primeru bo Sodišče za uslužbence uporabilo člen 97(3), drugi pododstavek, Poslovnika, v skladu s katerim se odvetnik, ki bo zastopal prosilca, določi ob upoštevanju predlogov, ki jih posreduje pristojni organ zadevne države članice iz priloge II k dodatku k Poslovniku Sodišča.
Title (e.g. Maître) and name: …
Odvetnik: …
SOLEMN DECLARATION
ČASTNA IZJAVA
I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the information given in this application for legal aid is correct and complete:
Podpisani(-a) častno izjavljam, da so podatki v tej vlogi za pravno pomoč resnični in popolni:
Signature of the applicant/applicant’s lawyer:
Podpis prosilca ali njegovega odvetnika:
LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
SEZNAM DOKAZIL
Supporting documents to enable your financial situation to be assessed:
Dokazila, na podlagi katerih je mogoča ocena vašega premoženjskega stanja:
If the action has not yet been brought, supporting documents relevant for the purposes of assessing whether the proposed action is admissible and well founded:
Dokazila, ki so potrebna za presojo dopustnosti in utemeljenosti nameravanega pravnega sredstva, če pravno sredstvo še ni bilo vloženo:
This guide is an integral part of the legal aid application form.
Ta navodila so sestavni del obrazca za vlogo za pravno pomoč.
The information which it contains is taken from the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal and the Practice Directions to parties.
Vsebujejo podatke iz Poslovnika Sodišča za uslužbence in iz Praktičnih navodil za stranke.
It is in the interests of the efficient conduct of proceedings before the Civil Service Tribunal and the expeditious processing of cases that practice directions should be issued to the lawyers and agents of parties, dealing with the manner in which pleadings and other procedural documents relating to the written procedure are to be submitted so as to ensure the efficient conduct of the hearing;
ob upoštevanju teh razlogov: v interesu učinkovitega poteka postopkov pred Sodiščem za uslužbence in za zagotavljanje reševanja sporov v najboljših razmerah in najkrajšem času je treba zastopnikom in odvetnikom strank dati na voljo praktična navodila o vlaganju vlog in listin v zvezi s pisnim postopkom in za zagotovitev učinkovitega poteka obravnave;
A copy, such as a stamp, facsimile signature, photocopy, etc. will not be accepted.
Nobena kopija, kot so pečat, faksimile podpisa, fotokopija itd., ni dopustna.
In the case of more than one representative, the signature of one of them will be sufficient.
Če je zastopnikov več, zadošča podpis enega od njih.
The pages of the application and annexes must in addition be numbered consecutively in the top right-hand corner, including any annexes and page dividers.
Strani tožbe in prilog, vključno z morebitnimi predelnimi listi, so oštevilčene zgoraj desno z zaporednimi številkami.
This is intended to ensure that all pages of documents scanned by the Tribunal have been duly scanned.
S tem naj bi se zagotovilo, da Sodišče za uslužbence pri skeniranju zajame vse strani.
That report normally describes the subject-matter of the proceedings, the forms of order sought, the aspects on which the parties are requested to concentrate in their oral arguments, the issues of fact and of law which need to be explored in greater depth etc., and indicates the time allowed for the opening arguments of the parties’ representatives. The Tribunal may also indicate its intention to examine the possibilities of an amicable settlement of the dispute at the hearing.
V tem poročilu so običajno navedeni predmet spora, tožbeni predlogi strank, stališča, na katera naj stranke osredotočijo svoje navedbe, dejanska in pravna vprašanja, ki zahtevajo poglobljeno obravnavo, itd. ter napotki glede trajanja uvodnih ustnih navedb zastopnikov strank; Sodišče za uslužbence lahko poleg tega navede, da namerava preučiti možnosti za mirno rešitev spora na obravnavi.
Resources of any other person who normally lives with you (child or other dependant).
Prihodki vsake druge osebe, ki živi z vami v skupnem gospodinjstvu (otrok ali vzdrževana oseba).
Specify: …
Navedite to (te) osebo(-e): …
where the language of the case is French, in the ‘Allegro’ courtroom at the seat of the Tribunal, at 35A Avenue J.F. Kennedy, Luxembourg, 1st floor
kadar je jezik postopka v zadevi francoščina, v razpravni dvorani „Allegro“ na sedežu Sodišča za uslužbence, 35A, Avenue J. F. Kennedy, Luxembourg, 1. nadstropje
Having regard to Article 120 of its Rules of Procedure; Whereas:
na podlagi člena 120 svojega poslovnika;
There is a map of the buildings on the website of the Court of Justice of the European Communities www.curia.europa.eu. There is ample parking around both buildings, although it is metered; the ‘Erasmus’ building also has an underground car park which visitors may use.
Načrt stavb je na spletni strani Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti www.curia.europa.eu Parkiranje je mogoče v bližini obeh stavb, vendar je parkirnina plačljiva; stavba „Erasmus“ pa ima tudi podzemno parkirišče, ki je na voljo obiskovalcem.
Amendments to the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities
Spremembe Poslovnika Sodišča prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti
THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
SODIŠČE PRVE STOPNJE EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI JE —
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, in particular the fifth paragraph of Article 224 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti njenega člena 224, peti odstavek,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, in particular the fifth paragraph of Article 140 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo in zlasti njenega člena 140, peti odstavek,
Having regard to Article 63 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice,
ob upoštevanju člena 63 Protokola o Statutu Sodišča,
In the light of experience, adaptation is necessary in order to enable the court to hear and determine more efficiently cases within the sphere of intellectual property,
ker je na podlagi pridobljenih izkušenj potrebna prilagoditev, da se sodišču omogoči učinkovitejše odločanje o zadevah s področja intelektualne lastnine —
HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS TO ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE:
SPREJELO NASLEDNJE SPREMEMBE SVOJEGA POSLOVNIKA:
The Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 2 May 1991 (OJ L 136 of 30 May 1991, p. 1), amended on 15 September 1994 (OJ L 249 of 24 September 1994, p. 17), 17 February 1995 (OJ L 44 of 28 February 1995, p. 64), 6 July 1995 (OJ L 172 of 22 July 1995, p. 3), 12 March 1997 (OJ L 103 of 19 April 1997, p. 6, with corrigendum OJ L 351 of 23 December 1997, p. 72), 17 May 1999 (OJ L 135 of 29 May 1999, p. 92), 6 December 2000 (OJ L 322 of 19 December 2000, p. 4), 21 May 2003 (OJ L 147 of 14 June 2003, p. 22), 19 April 2004 (OJ L 132 of 29 April 2004, p. 3), 21 April 2004 (OJ L 127 of 29 April 2004, p. 108), 12 October 2005 (OJ L 298 of 15 November 2005, p. 1) and 18 December 2006 (OJ L 386 of 29 December 2006, p. 45) are amended as follows:
Poslovnik Sodišča prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti z dne 2. maja 1991 (UL L 136, 30.5.1991, str. 1), spremenjen 15. septembra 1994 (UL L 249, 24.9.1994, str. 17), 17. februarja 1995 (UL L 44, 28.2.1995, str. 64), 6. julija 1995 (UL L 172, 22.7.1995, str. 3), 12. marca 1997 (UL L 103, 19.4.1997, str. 6, in popravek v UL L 351, 23.12.1997, str. 72), 17. maja 1999 (UL L 135, 29.5.1999, str. 92), 6. decembra 2000 (UL L 322, 19.12.2000, str. 4), 21. maja 2003 (UL L 147, 14.6.2003, str. 22), 19. aprila 2004 (UL L 132, 29.4.2004, str. 3), 21. aprila 2004 (UL L 127, 29.4.2004, str. 108), 12. oktobra 2005 (UL L 298, 15.11.2005, str. 1) in 18. decembra 2006 (UL L 386, 29.12.2006, str. 45) se spremeni, kot sledi:
In Article 24(7) a new sentence shall be added:
V člen 24(7) se doda nov stavek:
‘Copies of those documents shall likewise be sent to the European Parliament, to enable it to assess whether the inapplicability of an act adopted jointly by that institution and by the Council is being invoked under Article 241 of the EC Treaty.’
„Prepis tožbe in odgovora na tožbo se pošlje na enak način tudi Evropskemu parlamentu, da lahko le-ta ugotovi, ali se na podlagi člena 241 Pogodbe ES uveljavlja, da se akt, ki ga je sprejel skupaj s Svetom, ne uporabi.“
In the first subparagraph of Article 51(1) the last sentence shall be replaced by the following text:
Zadnji stavek člena 51(1), prvi pododstavek, se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
‘The decision to refer a case to a formation composed of a greater number of Judges shall be taken by the Court of First Instance in plenary session, after hearing the Advocate General.’
„Odločitev o predložitvi zadeve sestavi iz večjega števila sodnikov se po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca sprejme na občni seji.“
In Article 77, in subparagraph (c) ‘.’ shall be replaced by ‘;’ and a subparagraph (d) shall be added, worded as follows:
V členu 77 je v točki c) treba zamenjati „.“ s „;“ in dodati točko d), ki se glasi:
in other particular cases where the proper administration of justice so requires.’
v drugih posebnih primerih, če to zahteva dobro delovanje sodnega organa.“
In the first subparagraph of Article 100(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the words ‘other than a judgment or order of the Court of First Instance’ shall be replaced by ‘including a judgment or order of the Court of First Instance’; a new subparagraph, worded as follows: ‘Judgments and orders notified pursuant to Article 55 of the Statute of the Court of Justice to the Member States and institutions which were not parties to the proceedings shall be sent to them by telefax or any other technical means of communication.’ shall be added after the first subparagraph; lastly, in the following subparagraph, the words ‘nature or’ shall be deleted.
V členu 100(2), prvi pododstavek, Poslovnika se besede „razen sodb in sklepov Sodišča prve stopnje“ nadomestijo z „vključno s sodbami in sklepi Sodišča prve stopnje“; nov pododstavek, ki se glasi „Sodbe in sklepi, o katerih se v skladu s členom 55 Statuta Sodišča obvesti države članice in institucije, ki niso bile stranke v sporu, se jim pošljejo po telefaksu ali s katerim drugim tehničnim sredstvom sporočanja.“, je dodan za prvim pododstavkom; nazadnje se v naslednjem pododstavku črta besedi „vrste ali“.
The text of a new Article 135a shall be inserted between Article 135 and Article 136:
Besedilo novega člena 135a se vstavi med člen 135 in člen 136:
‘Article 135a
„Člen 135a
After the submission of pleadings as provided for in Article 135(1) and, if applicable, Article 135(2) and (3), the Court of First Instance, acting upon a report from the Judge-Rapporteur and after hearing the Advocate General and the parties, may decide to rule on the action without an oral procedure unless one of the parties submits an application setting out the reasons for which he wishes to be heard.
Po vložitvi vlog iz člena 135(1) in odvisno od primera tudi iz člena 135(2) in (3) lahko Sodišče prve stopnje na podlagi poročila sodnika poročevalca ter po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca in strank odloči, da ne bo opravilo ustnega postopka, razen če ena od strank vloži predlog, v katerem navede razloge, zaradi katerih želi biti slišana.
The application shall be submitted within a period of one month from notification to the party of closure of the written procedure.
Predlog se vloži v roku enega meseca po tem, ko je bila stranka obveščena o koncu pisnega postopka.
That period may be extended by the President.’
Predsednik lahko ta rok podaljša.“
These amendments to the Rules of Procedure, which are authentic in the languages mentioned in Article 35(1) of these Rules, shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall enter into force on the first day of the second month following their publication.
Te spremembe Poslovnika, ki so verodostojne v jezikih iz člena 35(1) Poslovnika, se objavijo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in začnejo veljati prvi dan drugega meseca po objavi.
Done at Luxembourg, 12 June 2008.
V Luxembourgu, 12. junija 2008 Sodni tajnik
Registrar
Predsednik
It is necessary to amend certain provisions of the Rules of Procedure in order, first, to have regard to the role of the European Parliament in connection with legislative procedure and, second, to adapt them to the needs of efficient organisation of the court;
ker je treba spremeniti določene določbe Poslovnika, da se v okviru zakonodajnega postopka upošteva vloga Evropskega parlamenta in da se te določbe prilagodijo zahtevam po učinkovitem delovanju sodišča,
Having regard to the approval of the Council given on 14 May 2008; Whereas:
ob upoštevanju odobritve Sveta z dne 14. maja 2008,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the sixth paragraph of Article 223 thereof,
na podlagi Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 223, šesti odstavek,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the sixth paragraph of Article 139 thereof,
na podlagi Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo in zlasti člena 139, šesti odstavek,
Article 225(2) and (3) of the EC Treaty and Article 140a(2) and (3) of the EAEC Treaty provide that there is to be a procedure for the review by the Court of Justice of the decisions of the Court of First Instance where that Court has ruled on an appeal brought against a decision of a judicial panel or has given a ruling on questions referred for a preliminary ruling in specific areas laid down by the Statute.
člen 225(2) in (3) Pogodbe ES ter člen 140a(2) in (3) Pogodbe ESAE izjemoma določata postopek ponovnega preizkusa Sodišča za odločbe Sodišča prve stopnje, kadar to odloča o tožbah ali postopkih zoper odločbo določenega sodnega oddelka ali kadar odloča o vprašanjih, predloženih v predhodno odločanje, na posebnih področjih, določenih s Statutom Sodišča;
The conditions and limits applying to the review procedure have been laid down in Articles 62 to 62b of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice.
pogoji in meje postopka ponovnega preizkusa so bili določeni s členi od 62 do 62b Protokola o Statutu Sodišča;
The Rules of Procedure should regulate the conduct of the review procedure and lay down certain detailed rules to govern it.
v Poslovniku morajo biti določeni potek postopka ponovnega preizkusa in podrobna pravila tega postopka.
With the Council’s approval given on 23 June 2008.
Po odobritvi Sveta z dne 23. junija 2008 –
HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS TO ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE:
SPREJEMA NASLEDNJE SPREMEMBE SVOJEGA POSLOVNIKA:
The Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 19 June 1991 (OJ L 176, 4.7.1991, p. 7, with corrigendum in OJ L 383, 29.12.1992, p. 117), as amended on 21 February 1995 (OJ L 44, 28.2.1995, p. 61), 11 March 1997 (OJ L 103, 19.4.1997, p. 1, with corrigendum in OJ L 351, 23.12.1997, p. 72), 16 May 2000 (OJ L 122, 24.5.2000, p. 43), 28 November 2000 (OJ L 322, 19.12.2000, p. 1), 3 April 2001 (OJ L 119, 27.4.2001, p. 1), 17 September 2002 (OJ L 272, 10.10.2002, p. 24, with corrigendum in OJ L 281, 19.10.2002, p. 24), 8 April 2003 (OJ L 147, 14.6.2003, p. 17), 19 April 2004 (OJ L 132, 29.4.2004, p. 2), 20 April 2004 (OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 107), 12 July 2005 (OJ L 203, 4.8.2005, p. 19), 18 October 2005 (OJ L 288, 29.10.2005, p. 51), 18 December 2006 (OJ L 386, 29.12.2006, p. 44) and 15 January 2008 (OJ L 24, 29.1.2008, p. 39) are hereby amended as follows:
Poslovnik Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, sprejet 19. junija 1991 (UL L 176, 4.7.1991, str. 7, in popravek v UL L 383, 29.12.1992, str. 117), kot je bil spremenjen 21. februarja 1995 (UL L 44, 28.2.1995, str. 61), 11. marca 1997 (UL L 103, 19.4.1997, str. 1, in popravek v UL L 351, 23.12.1997, str. 72), 16. maja 2000 (UL L 122, 24.5.2000, str. 43), 28. novembra 2000 (UL L 322, 19.12.2000, str. 1), 3. aprila 2001 (UL L 119, 27.4.2001, str. 1), 17. septembra 2002 (UL L 272, 10.10.2002, str. 24, in popravek v UL L 281, 19.10.2002, str. 24), 8. aprila 2003 (UL L 147, 14.6.2003, str. 17), 19. aprila 2004 (UL L 132, 29.4.2004, str. 2), 20. aprila 2004 (UL L 127, 29.4.2004, str. 107), 12. julija 2005 (UL L 203, 4.8.2005, str. 19), 18. oktobra 2005 (UL L 288, 29.10.2005, str. 51), 18. decembra 2006 (UL L 386, 29.12.2006, str. 44) in 15. januarja 2008 (UL L 24, 29.1.2008, str. 39), se spremeni, kot sledi:
The following shall be inserted after Article 123:
Za členom 123 se vstavi naslednje besedilo:
‘TITLE IVA
„NASLOV IVa
REVIEW OF DECISIONS OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
PONOVNI PREIZKUS ODLOČB SODIŠČA PRVE STOPNJE
Article 123b
Člen 123b
A special Chamber shall be set up for the purpose of deciding, in accordance with Article 123d, whether a decision of the Court of First Instance is to be reviewed in accordance with Article 62 of the Statute.
Ustanovi se poseben senat, ki v skladu s pogoji iz člena 123d odloči, ali je treba v skladu s členom 62 Statuta ponovno preizkusiti odločbo Sodišča prve stopnje.
That Chamber shall be composed of the President of the Court and of four of the Presidents of the Chambers of five Judges designated according to the order of precedence laid down in Article 6 of these Rules.
Ta senat je sestavljen iz predsednika Sodišča in štirih predsednikov senatov petih sodnikov, ki so določeni v skladu z vrstnim redom iz člena 6 tega poslovnika.
Article 123c
Člen 123c
As soon as the date for the delivery of a decision to be given under Article 225(2) or (3) of the EC Treaty or Article 140a(2) or (3) of the EAEC Treaty is fixed, the Registry of the Court of First Instance shall inform the Registry of the Court of Justice.
Takoj ko je določen dan razglasitve odločbe, ki se sprejme v skladu s členom 225(2) ali (3) Pogodbe ES oziroma s členom 140a(2) ali (3) Pogodbe ESAE, sodni tajnik Sodišča prve stopnje o tem obvesti sodnega tajnika Sodišča.
The decision shall be communicated immediately upon its delivery.
To odločbo mu posreduje, takoj ko je razglašena.
Article 123d
Člen 123d
The proposal of the First Advocate General to review a decision of the Court of First Instance shall be forwarded to the President of the Court of Justice and notice of that transmission shall be given to the Registrar at the same time.
Predlog prvega generalnega pravobranilca za ponovni preizkus odločbe Sodišča prve stopnje se posreduje predsedniku Sodišča, pri čemer se o tem istočasno obvesti sodnega tajnika.
Where the decision of the Court of First Instance has been given under Article 225(3) of the EC Treaty or Article 140a(3) of the EAEC Treaty, the Registrar shall forthwith inform the Court of First Instance, the national court, the parties to the proceedings before the national court and the other interested parties referred to in the second paragraph of Article 62a of the Statute of the proposal to review.
Če je bila odločba Sodišča prve stopnje sprejeta v skladu s členom 225(3) Pogodbe ES oziroma v skladu s členom 140a(3) Pogodbe ESAE, sodni tajnik o predlogu za ponovni preizkus takoj obvesti Sodišče prve stopnje, nacionalno sodišče, stranke v postopku pred tem sodiščem in druge udeležence iz člena 62a, drugi odstavek, Statuta.
As soon as the proposal to review has been received, the President shall designate the Judge-Rapporteur from among the Judges of the Chamber referred to in Article 123b.
Po prejemu predloga za ponovni preizkus predsednik med sodniki, člani senata iz člena 123b, določi sodnika poročevalca.
That Chamber, acting on a report from the Judge-Rapporteur, shall decide whether the decision of the Court of First Instance is to be reviewed.
Ta senat na podlagi poročila sodnika poročevalca odloči, ali je treba odločbo Sodišča prve stopnje ponovno preizkusiti.
The decision to review the decision of the Court of First Instance shall indicate the questions which are to be reviewed.
V odločbi o ponovnem preizkusu odločbe Sodišča prve stopnje se navedejo vprašanja, ki so predmet ponovnega preizkusa.
Where the decision of the Court of First Instance has been given under Article 225(2) of the EC Treaty or Article 140a(2) of the EAEC Treaty, the Court of First Instance, the parties to the proceedings before it and the other interested parties referred to in the second paragraph of Article 62a of the Statute shall forthwith be informed by the Registrar of the decision of the Court of Justice to review the decision of the Court of First Instance.
Če je bila odločba Sodišča prve stopnje sprejeta v skladu s členom 225(2) Pogodbe ES oziroma s členom 140a(2) Pogodbe ESAE, sodni tajnik o odločbi Sodišča o ponovnem preizkusu odločbe Sodišča prve stopnje nemudoma obvesti Sodišče prve stopnje, stranke v postopku pred tem sodiščem in druge udeležence iz člena 62a, drugi odstavek, Statuta.
Where the decision of the Court of First Instance has been given under Article 225(3) of the EC Treaty or Article 140a(3) of the EAEC Treaty, the Court of First Instance, the national court, the parties to the proceedings before the national court and the other interested parties referred to in the second paragraph of Article 62a of the Statute shall forthwith be informed by the Registrar of the decision of the Court of Justice as to whether or not the decision of the Court of First Instance is to be reviewed.
Če je bila odločba Sodišča prve stopnje sprejeta v skladu s členom 225(3) Pogodbe ES oziroma s členom 140a(3) Pogodbe ESAE, sodni tajnik o odločbi Sodišča, ali se odločba Sodišča prve stopnje ponovno preizkusi ali ne, nemudoma obvesti Sodišče prve stopnje, nacionalno sodišče, stranke v postopku pred tem sodiščem in druge udeležence iz člena 62a, drugi odstavek, Statuta.