natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
All the Member States have ratified the Council of Europe Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons of 21 March 1983.
Vse države članice so ratificirale Konvencijo Sveta Evrope o transferju obsojenih oseb z dne 21. marca 1983.
Under that Convention, sentenced persons may be transferred to serve the remainder of their sentence only to their State of nationality and only with their consent and that of the States involved.
V skladu s to konvencijo je transfer obsojenih oseb z namenom prestajanja preostalega dela sankcije mogoč samo v državo njihovega državljanstva in le z njihovo privolitvijo ter s soglasjem vpletenih držav.
The Additional Protocol to that Convention of 18 December 1997, which allows transfer without the person’s consent, subject to certain conditions, has not been ratified by all the Member States.
Dodatnega protokola h Konvenciji z dne 18. decembra 1997, ki pod določenimi pogoji dovoljuje premestitev brez privolitve posameznika, niso ratificirale vse države članice.
Neither instrument imposes any basic duty to take charge of sentenced persons for enforcement of a sentence or order.
Noben od teh instrumentov ne nalaga obveznosti prevzema odgovornosti za obsojene osebe z namenom izvršitve obsodbe oziroma naloga sodišča.
Procedural rights in criminal proceedings are a crucial element for ensuring mutual confidence among the Member States in judicial cooperation.
Procesne pravice v kazenskih postopkih so ključnega pomena za zagotovitev vzajemnega zaupanja med državami članicami pri pravosodnem sodelovanju.
Relations between the Member States, which are characterised by special mutual confidence in other Member States’ legal systems, enable recognition by the executing State of decisions taken by the issuing State’s authorities.
Odnosi med državami članicami, ki temeljijo na vzajemnem zaupanju v pravne sisteme drugih držav članic, omogočajo priznavanje odločb organov države izdajateljice s strani države izvršiteljice.
Therefore, a further development of the cooperation provided for in the Council of Europe instruments concerning the enforcement of criminal judgments should be envisaged, in particular where citizens of the Union were the subject of a criminal judgment and were sentenced to a custodial sentence or a measure involving deprivation of liberty in another Member State.
Zato bi bilo treba načrtovati nadaljnji razvoj sodelovanja, predviden v instrumentih Sveta Evrope glede izvrševanja kazenskih sodb, zlasti kadar so bili državljani Unije v drugi državi članici s kazensko sodbo obsojeni na zaporno kazen ali ukrep, ki vključuje odvzem prostosti.
Notwithstanding the need to provide the sentenced person with adequate safeguards, his or her involvement in the proceedings should no longer be dominant by requiring in all cases his or her consent to the forwarding of a judgment to another Member State for the purpose of its recognition and enforcement of the sentence imposed.
Ne glede na potrebo po tem, da se obsojeni osebi zagotovijo ustrezna jamstva v postopku, naj ne bi bilo več nujno potrebno v vseh primerih zahtevati njenega privolitve za posredovanje sodbe v drugo državo članico zaradi priznanja in izvršitve izrečene kazenske sankcije.
This Framework Decision should be implemented and applied in a manner which allows general principles of equality, fairness and reasonableness to be respected.
Ta okvirni sklep bi bilo treba izvajati in uporabljati na način, ki bi omogočal spoštovanje splošnih načel enakosti, pravičnosti in razumnosti.
Article 4(1)(c) contains a discretionary provision which enables the judgment and the certificate to be forwarded, for example, to the Member State of nationality of the sentenced person, in cases other than those provided for in paragraphs 1(a) and (b) or to the Member State in which the sentenced person lives and has been legally residing continuously for at least five years and will retain a permanent right of residence there.
Člen 4(1)(c) vsebuje diskrecijsko določbo, ki bi omogočala, da se potrdilo in sodba na primer posredujeta državi članici državljanstva obsojene osebe, razen v primerih iz odstavka 1(a) in (b), ali državi članici, v kateri obsojena oseba živi in neprekinjeno zakonito prebiva vsaj pet let ter bo v njej obdržala pravico do stalnega prebivališča.
In cases referred to in Article 4(1)(c) the forwarding of the judgment and the certificate to the executing State is subject to consultations between the competent authorities of the issuing and the executing States, and the consent of the competent authority of the executing State.
V primerih iz člena 4(1)(c) se posredovanje sodbe in potrdila državi izvršiteljici izvede na podlagi posvetovanj med pristojnimi organi države izdajateljice in države izvršiteljice ter s privolitvijo pristojnega organa države izvršiteljice.
The competent authorities should take into account such elements as, for example, duration of the residence or other links to the executing State.
Pristojni organi bi morali upoštevati dejavnike, kot so na primer trajanje bivanja ali druge vezi z državo izvršiteljico.
In cases where the sentenced person could be transferred to a Member State and to a third country under national law or international instruments, the competent authorities of the issuing and executing States should, in consultations, consider whether enforcement in the executing State would enhance the aim of social rehabilitation better than enforcement in the third country.
V primerih, ko bi obsojena oseba v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo ali mednarodnimi instrumenti lahko bila premeščena v državo članico ali tretjo državo, bi morali pristojni organi države izdajateljice in države izvršiteljice s posvetovanji preučiti, ali bi izvršitev v državi izvršiteljici omogočila boljšo socialno rehabilitacijo kot njena izvršitev v tretji državi.
Enforcement of the sentence in the executing State should enhance the possibility of social rehabilitation of the sentenced person.
Izvršitev kazenske sankcije v državi izvršiteljici bi morala izboljšati možnost socialne rehabilitacije obsojene osebe.
In the context of satisfying itself that the enforcement of the sentence by the executing State will serve the purpose of facilitating the social rehabilitation of the sentenced person, the competent authority of the issuing State should take into account such elements as, for example, the person’s attachment to the executing State, whether he or she considers it the place of family, linguistic, cultural, social or economic and other links to the executing State.
Da se prepriča o tem, da bo izvršitev kazenske sankcije s strani države izvršiteljice omogočila lažjo socialno rehabilitacijo obsojene osebe, bi moral pristojni organ države izdajateljice upoštevati dejavnike, kakršen je na primer navezanost osebe na državo izvršiteljico, ter dejstvo, da obsojena oseba smatra, da ima v državi izvršiteljici družinske, jezikovne, kulturne, socialne ali ekonomske in druge vezi.
The opinion of the sentenced person referred to in Article 6(3) may be useful mainly in applying Article 4(4).
Mnenje obsojene osebe iz člena 6(3) je lahko koristno zlasti pri uporabi člena 4(4).
The words ‘in particular’ are intended to cover also cases where the opinion of the sentenced person would include information which might be of relevance in relation to the grounds for non-recognition and non-enforcement.
Beseda „zlasti“ bi morala zajemati tudi primere, ko mnenje obsojene osebe vsebuje informacije, ki bi utegnile biti pomembne za razloge za nepriznanje in neizvršitev.
Provisions of Articles 4(4) and 6(3) do not constitute a ground for refusal on social rehabilitation.
Določbe členov 4(4) in 6(3) ne predstavljajo razloga za zavrnitev zaradi socialne rehabilitacije.
Poland needs more time than the other Member States to face the practical and material consequences of transfer of Polish citizens convicted in other Member States, especially in the light of an increased mobility of Polish citizens within the Union.
Poljska potrebuje več časa kot druge države članice za soočenje s praktičnimi in materialnimi posledicami premestitve poljskih državljanov, ki so bili obsojeni v drugih državah članicah, zlasti v luči povečane mobilnosti poljskih državljanov v Uniji.
For that reason, a temporary derogation of limited scope for a maximum period of five years should be foreseen.
Zaradi tega bi bilo treba predvideti po obsegu omejeno začasno odstopanje za največ pet let.
This Framework Decision should also, mutatis mutandis, apply to the enforcement of sentences in the cases under Articles 4(6) and 5(3) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States [3].
Ta okvirni sklep bi se moral smiselno uporabljati tudi za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij v primerih iz členov 4(6) in 5(3) Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/584/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami [3].
This means, inter alia, that, without prejudice to that Framework Decision, the executing State could verify the existence of grounds for non-recognition and non-enforcement as provided in Article 9 of this Framework Decision, including the checking of double criminality to the extent that the executing State makes a declaration under Article 7(4) of this Framework Decision, as a condition for recognising and enforcing the judgment with a view to considering whether to surrender the person or to enforce the sentence in cases pursuant to Article 4(6) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA.
To med drugim pomeni, da bi lahko država izvršiteljica brez poseganja v Okvirni sklep Sveta 2002/584/PNZ preverjala obstoj razlogov za nepriznanje in neizvršitev iz člena 9 tega okvirnega sklepa, vključno s preverjanjem dvojne kaznivosti, če je država izvršiteljica podala izjavo v skladu s členom 7(4) tega okvirnega sklepa kot pogoj za priznanje in izvršitev sodbe z namenom predaje osebe ali izvršitve kazenske sankcije v primerih iz člena 7(4) Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/PNZ.
This Framework Decision respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union and reflected by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular Chapter VI thereof.
Ta okvirni sklep spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, ki jih priznava člen 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in so odražena v Listina o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije, zlasti v poglavju VI Listine.
Nothing in this Framework Decision should be interpreted as prohibiting refusal to execute a decision when there are objective reasons to believe that the sentence was imposed for the purpose of punishing a person on the grounds of his or her sex, race, religion, ethnic origin, nationality, language, political opinions or sexual orientation, or that that person’s position may be prejudiced on any one of those grounds.
Ničesar iz tega okvirnega sklepa se ne bi smelo razlagati kot prepoved zavrnitve izvršitve odločbe, kadar obstajajo objektivni razlogi za prepričanje, da je bila kazenska sankcija izrečena z namenom kaznovanja osebe na podlagi njenega spola, rase, vere, narodnosti, državljanstva, jezika, političnega prepričanja ali spolne usmerjenosti ali, da je oseba zaradi katerega koli od teh razlogov lahko v slabšem položaju.
This Framework Decision should not prevent any Member State from applying its constitutional rules relating to due process, freedom of association, freedom of the press and freedom of expression in other media.
Ta okvirni sklep nobeni državi članici ne bi smel preprečevati, da uporablja svoja ustavna pravila glede pravičnega postopka, svobode združevanja, svobode tiska in svobode izražanja v drugih medijih.
This Framework Decision should be applied in accordance with the right of citizens of the Union to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States conferred by Article 18 of the Treaty establishing European Community.
Ta okvirni sklep bi bilo treba uporabljati v skladu s pravico državljanov Unije do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic, kot je določena v členu 18 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti.
This Framework Decision should be applied in accordance with applicable Community legislation, including in particular Council Directive 2003/86/EC [4], Council Directive 2003/109/EC [5] and Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [6].
Ta okvirni sklep bi bilo treba uporabljati v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo Skupnosti, med drugim zlasti z Direktivo Sveta 2003/86/ES [4], Direktivo Sveta 2003/109/ES [5] in Direktivo 2004/38/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6].
Where in this Framework Decision reference is made to the State in which the sentenced person ‘lives’, this indicates the place to which that person is attached based on habitual residence and on elements such as family, social or professional ties.
Kadar se ta okvirni sklep sklicuje na državo, kjer obsojena oseba „živi“, je mišljen kraj, na katerega je ta oseba navezana zaradi običajnega prebivališča in na podlagi dejavnikov, kot so družinske, socialne ali poklicne vezi.
When applying Article 5(1), it should be possible to transmit a judgment or a certified copy thereof and a certificate to the competent authority in the executing State by any means which leaves a written record, for example e-mail and fax, under conditions allowing the executing State to establish authenticity.
Pri uporabi člena 5(1) bi bilo treba omogočiti, da se sodba ali overjena kopija sodbe in potrdilo posredujeta pristojnemu organu v državi izvršiteljici, in sicer na kakršen koli način, ki omogoča pisni zapis, na primer prek elektronske pošte ali faksa, pod pogoji, ki državi izvršiteljici omogočajo, da ugotovi njuno verodostojnost.
In cases referred to in Article 9(1)(k), the executing State should consider the possibility of adapting the sentence in accordance with this Framework Decision before it refuses to recognise and enforce the sentence involving a measure other than a custodial sentence.
V primerih iz člena 9(1)(k) bi morala država izvršiteljica razmisliti o možnosti prilagoditve kazenske sankcije v skladu s tem okvirnim sklepom, preden se odloči zavrniti priznanje in izvršitev kazenske sankcije, ki vključuje ukrep, ki ni zaporna kazen.
The ground for refusal provided for in Article 9(1)(k) may be applied also in cases where the person has not been found guilty of a criminal offence although the competent authority applied the measure involving the deprivation of liberty other than a custodial sentence as a consequence of a criminal offence.
Razlog za zavrnitev iz člena 9(1)(k) se lahko uporabi tudi v primerih, ko oseba ni bila spoznana za krivo storitve kaznivega dejanja, čeprav je pristojni organ kot posledico kaznivega dejanja uporabil drug ukrep odvzema prostosti, kot je zaporna kazen.
The ground for refusal relating to territoriality should be applied only in exceptional cases and with a view to cooperating to the greatest extent possible under the provisions of this Framework Decision, while taking into account its purpose.
Razlog za zavrnitev na podlagi teritorialnosti bi bilo treba uporabiti le v izjemnih primerih in zaradi kar najtesnejšega sodelovanja, ki naj bi potekalo v skladu z določbami tega okvirnega sklepa v kar največji možni meri, pri čemer pa bi bilo treba upoštevati namen tega okvirnega sklepa.
Any decision to apply this ground for refusal, should be based on a case-by-case analysis and consultations between the competent authorities of the issuing and executing States.
Vsaka odločitev glede uporabe tega razloga za zavrnitev bi morala temeljiti na analizi posameznega primera in posvetovanjih med pristojnimi organi države izdajateljice in države izvršiteljice.
The time limit referred to in Article 12(2) should be implemented by the Member States in such a way that as a general rule, the final decision, including an appeal procedure is completed within a period of 90 days.
Rok iz člena 12(2) bi morale države članice v notranje pravo prenesti tako, da bi se postopek do pravnomočnosti odločbe, vključno s pritožbenim postopkom, moral praviloma zaključiti v roku 90 dni.
Article 18(1) states that, subject to the exceptions listed in paragraph 2, the specialty rule applies only where the person has been transferred to the executing State.
Člen 18(1) določa, da se načelo specialnosti, ob upoštevanju izjem iz odstavka 2 navedenega člena, uporablja le, če je bila oseba premeščena v državo izvršiteljico.
It should therefore not be applicable where the person has not been transferred to the executing State, for example where the person has fled to the executing State,
Načelo specialnosti se ne bi smelo uporabljati, če se oseba ni premestila v državo izvršiteljico, na primer v primerih, če je oseba zbežala v državo izvršiteljico –
‘judgment’ shall mean a final decision or order of a court of the issuing State imposing a sentence on a natural person;
„sodba“ pomeni pravnomočno odločbo ali nalog sodišča države izdajateljice, s katerim je izrečena kazenska sankcija za fizično osebo;
‘sentence’ shall mean any custodial sentence or any measure involving deprivation of liberty imposed for a limited or unlimited period of time on account of a criminal offence on the basis of criminal proceedings;
„kazenska sankcija“ pomeni vsakršno zaporno kazen ali ukrep odvzema prostosti, izrečen za določen ali nedoločen čas na podlagi kazenskega postopka zaradi kaznivega dejanja;
‘issuing State’ shall mean the Member State in which a judgment is delivered;
„država izdajateljica“ pomeni državo članico, v kateri je bila izdana sodba;
‘executing State’ shall mean the Member State to which a judgment is forwarded for the purpose of its recognition and enforcement.
„država izvršiteljica“ pomeni državo članico, kateri je bila sodba posredovana zaradi njenega priznanja in izvršitve.
Each Member State shall inform the General Secretariat of the Council which authority or authorities, under its national law, are competent in accordance with this Framework Decision, when that Member State is the issuing State or the executing State.
Vsaka država članica obvesti generalni sekretariat Sveta o tem, kateri organ ali organi so po njenem nacionalnem pravu in v skladu s tem okvirnim sklepom pristojni, kadar je ta država članica država izdajateljica ali država izvršiteljica.
The General Secretariat of the Council shall make the information received available to all Member States and the Commission.
Generalni sekretariat Sveta omogoči vsem državam članicam in Komisiji dostop do prejetih informacij.
The purpose of this Framework Decision is to establish the rules under which a Member State, with a view to facilitating the social rehabilitation of the sentenced person, is to recognise a judgment and enforce the sentence.
Namen tega okvirnega sklepa je določiti pravila, na podlagi katerih država članica v luči zaradi lažje socialne rehabilitacije obsojene osebe prizna sodbo in izvrši kazensko sankcijo.
This Framework Decision shall apply where the sentenced person is in the issuing State or in the executing State.
Ta okvirni sklep se uporablja, kadar se obsojena oseba nahaja v državi izdajateljici ali v državi izvršiteljici.
This Framework Decision shall apply only to the recognition of judgments and the enforcement of sentences within the meaning of this Framework Decision.
Ta okvirni sklep se uporablja le za priznavanje sodb in izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij v smislu tega okvirnega sklepa.
The fact that, in addition to the sentence, a fine and/or a confiscation order has been imposed, which has not yet been paid, recovered or enforced, shall not prevent a judgment from being forwarded.
Dejstvo, da je bila poleg kazenske sankcije izrečena denarna kazen in/ali odredba o zaplembi, ki še ni bila plačana, izterjana ali izvršena, ne preprečuje posredovanja sodbe.
The recognition and enforcement of such fines and confiscation orders in another Member State shall be based on the instruments applicable between the Member States, in particular Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA of 24 February 2005 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties [7] and Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders [8].
Priznavanje in izvrševanje takšnih denarnih kazni ter odredb o zaplembi v drugi državi članici temelji na instrumentih, ki se uporabljajo med državami članicami, zlasti Okvirni sklep Sveta 2005/214/PNZ z dne 24. februarja 2005 o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja denarnih kazni [7] ter Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2006/783/PNZ z dne 6. oktobra 2006 o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja odredb o zaplembi [8].
This Framework Decision shall not have the effect of modifying the obligation to respect fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles as enshrined in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ta okvirni sklep ne spreminja obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz spoštovanja temeljnih pravic in temeljnih pravnih načel iz člena 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
RECOGNITION OF JUDGMENTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SENTENCES
PRIZNAVANJE SODB IN IZVRŠEVANJE KAZENSKIH SANKCIJ
Criteria for forwarding a judgment and a certificate to another Member State
Merila za posredovanje sodbe in potrdila drugi državi članici
Provided that the sentenced person is in the issuing State or in the executing State, and provided that this person has given his or her consent where required under Article 6, a judgment, together with the certificate for which the standard form is given in Annex I, may be forwarded to one of the following Member States:
Če se obsojena oseba nahaja v državi izdajateljici ali v državi izvršiteljici ter če je ta oseba v to privolila, kadar se privolitev zahteva po členu 6, se sodba skupaj s potrdilom, katerega standardni obrazec je določen v Prilogi I, lahko pošlje eni od naslednjih držav članic:
the Member State of nationality of the sentenced person in which he or she lives; or
državi članici državljanstva obsojene osebe, v kateri živi, ali
the Member State of nationality, to which, while not being the Member State where he or she lives, the sentenced person will be deported, once he or she is released from the enforcement of the sentence on the basis of an expulsion or deportation order included in the judgment or in a judicial or administrative decision or any other measure taken consequential to the judgment; or
državi članici državljanstva, čeprav to ni država članica, v kateri živi, v katero bo obsojena oseba izgnana na podlagi ukrepa izgona ali prisilne odstranitve, ki je sestavni del sodbe, sodne ali upravne odločbe, ali katerega koli drugega ukrepa, ki je posledica sodbe, potem ko bo zanjo izvrševanje kazenske sankcije prenehalo, ali
any Member State other than a Member State referred to in (a) or (b), the competent authority of which consents to the forwarding of the judgment and the certificate to that Member State.
kateri koli drugi državi članici, ki ni država članica iz točke (a) ali (b), katere pristojni organ soglaša s posredovanjem sodbe in potrdila.
The forwarding of the judgment and the certificate may take place where the competent authority of the issuing State, where appropriate after consultations between the competent authorities of the issuing and the executing States, is satisfied that the enforcement of the sentence by the executing State would serve the purpose of facilitating the social rehabilitation of the sentenced person.
Posredovanje sodbe in potrdila se lahko izvede, kadar je pristojni organ države izdajateljice prepričan – po potrebi po posvetovanjih, izvedenih med pristojnimi organi države izdajateljice in države izvršiteljice – da bi izvršitev kazenske sankcije s strani države izvršiteljice olajšala socialno rehabilitacijo obsojene osebe.
Before forwarding the judgment and the certificate, the competent authority of the issuing State may consult, by any appropriate means, the competent authority of the executing State.
Preden pristojni organ države izdajateljice posreduje sodbo in potrdilo se lahko na primeren način posvetuje s pristojnim organom države izvršiteljice.
Consultation shall be obligatory in the cases referred to in paragraph 1(c).
Posvetovanje je obvezno v primerih iz odstavka 1(c).