natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Unit prices decreased slightly from 2003 to the RIP, i.e. by 3 %, although raw material prices increased.
Cene na enoto so se od leta 2003 do OPP kljub zvišanju cen surovin rahlo znižale, tj. za 3 %.
The Community industry’s profitability fell during the RIP.
Dobičkonosnost industrije Skupnosti se je v OPP zmanjšala.
Production, production capacity and capacity utilisation rate increased which is, however, mainly due to the increase in export activities of the Community industry.
Proizvodnja, proizvodna zmogljivost in izkoriščenost zmogljivosti so se povečale, kar pa je v glavnem posledica povečanja izvozne dejavnosti industrije Skupnosti.
Historically, the sector has always shown very high profitability level which is needed to recoup investments necessary to adapt the production to new security requirements and improve the overall competitiveness of the company.
Za ta sektor je značilna zelo visoka stopnja dobičkonosnosti, ki je potrebna, da se povrnejo stroški naložb, potrebnih za prilagoditev proizvodnje novim varnostnim zahtevam in izboljšanje splošne konkurenčnosti družbe.
It is to be noted that the injury margin calculated for the RIP was over 60 %.
Opozoriti je treba, da je stopnja škode, izračunana za OPP, znašala več kot 60 %.
Imports from the PRC and Taiwan were undercutting the Community industry prices by an average of 39 %.
Uvoz iz LRK in Tajvana je cene industrije Skupnosti nelojalno znižal za povprečno 39 %.
Annual investments in the like product developed positively during the period considered i.e. increased by 60 %.
Letne naložbe v podobni izdelek so se v obravnavanem obdobju razvijale pozitivno in se povišale za 60 %.
These investments related mainly to the reorganization of the production from 2005 in order to restart production capacities.
Te naložbe so bile povezane v glavnem z reorganizacijo proizvodnje od leta 2005 z namenom ponovnega zagona proizvodnih zmogljivosti.
Employment increased by 5 %.
Zaposlenost se je povečala za 5 %.
Cash flow followed the same trend as profit during the RIP and decreased by 50 %.
Denarni tok se je med OPP gibal enako kot dobiček in se zmanjšal za 50 %.
Recitals (69) and (70) above show that the main injury factors (sales prices, sales volume, market share and profitability) decreased during the period considered and that the Community industry still suffered injury despite the measures in force.
Uvodni izjavi 69 in 70 kažeta, da so se glavni dejavniki škode (prodajne cene, obseg prodaje, tržni delež in dobičkonosnost) v obravnavanem obdobju poslabšali in da je industrija Skupnosti kljub veljavnim ukrepom še vedno trpela škodo.
The injury is mainly translated in a loss of market share despite increasing consumption, but also in a decrease in profitability due to the price pressure from imports from the PRC and Taiwan.
Škoda se odraža predvsem v izgubi tržnega deleža kljub povečani potrošnji, pa tudi v zmanjšanju dobičkonosnosti zaradi cenovnega pritiska uvoza iz LRK in Tajvana.
Thus, the increase of raw material costs could not be translated in higher selling prices.
Povišanje stroškov surovin se torej ni moglo odražati v višjih prodajnih cenah.
Historically, the sector has always shown very high profitability levels.
Za ta sektor so sicer značilne zelo visoke stopnje dobičkonosnosti.
In the original investigation, for the purpose of establishing the injury elimination level, it was considered that any measure should allow the Community industry to cover its costs of production and to achieve a reasonable profit, namely 15 % on sales turnover.
V prvotni preiskavi se je za namene določitve stopnje odprave škode menilo, da morajo ukrepi omogočiti industriji Skupnosti, da pokrije stroške proizvodnje in ustvari razumen dobiček, namreč 15 % prihodka od prodaje.
This percentage is needed to recoup investments necessary to adapt the production to new security requirements and improve the overall competitiveness of the company.
Ta delež je nujen za povrnitev stroškov naložb, potrebnih za prilagoditev proizvodnje novim varnostnim standardom, in izboljšanje splošne konkurenčnosti družbe.
The somewhat negative situation of the Community industry, despite the measures in place, can be explained by the high degree of circumvention which characterises the sector, as found by OLAF.
Kljub veljavnim ukrepom nekoliko negativno stanje industrije Skupnosti se lahko pojasni z visoko stopnjo izogibanja ukrepom, značilno za ta sektor, kot je to ugotovil OLAF.
The importers contested the findings of the Commission concerning the economic situation of the Community industry.
Uvozniki so spodbijali ugotovitve Komisije glede gospodarskega stanja industrije Skupnosti.
The figures submitted to substantiate their claim did however not relate to the situation of the Community industry in Europe as far as gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters are concerned but to the worldwide activities of the Community producer’s entire lighter division.
Podatki, ki so jih predložili v podporo svoji trditvi, pa se niso nanašali na stanje industrije Skupnosti v Evropi glede žepnih plinskih vžigalnikov na kresilni kamen, ki jih ni mogoče ponovno napolniti, temveč na svetovne dejavnosti proizvajalcev Skupnosti v celotnem sektorju vžigalnikov.
These data were irrelevant in the determination of the Community industry’s state and the argument had therefore to be rejected.
Ti podatki so bili za določitev stanja industrije Skupnosti nepomembni, zato je bilo treba argument zavrniti.
The importers claimed that the Community producer had shifted a significant part of its Community production from flint to piezo lighters.
Uvozniki so trdili, da je proizvajalec Skupnosti znaten del svoje proizvodnje Skupnosti z vžigalnikov na kresilni kamen preusmeril na vžigalnike piezo.
As a consequence, its market share for flint lighters showed a decreasing trend.
Posledično je njegov tržni delež vžigalnikov na kresilni kamen izkazoval negativen trend.
The investigation revealed that this statement is incorrect.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je ta trditev napačna.
Indeed, the overall Community lighter market has been increasing over the last years and the share of flint lighters in the lighter market has been slightly decreasing but remained at a level of 70 % in 2006.
Dejansko je skupni trg vžigalnikov v Skupnosti zadnja leta rasel in delež vžigalnikov na kresilni kamen se je na trgu vžigalnikov rahlo znižal, vendar je leta 2006 še vedno znašal 70 %.
In this perspective, it should be reminded that the flint market consumption increased over the period considered and that the share of flint lighters sold by the Community industry decreased over the period considered.
S tem v zvezi je treba opomniti, da se je potrošnja vžigalnikov na kresilni kamen v obravnavanem obdobju povečala in da se je delež vžigalnikov na kresilni kamen, ki jih je prodala industrija Skupnosti, v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal.
The arguments put forward are therefore rejected.
Navedene trditve je torej treba zavrniti.
The importers argued that the Community producer holds a monopoly in the Community and anti-dumping measures would enforce its position even further.
Uvozniki so trdili, da ima proizvajalec Skupnosti monopol v Skupnosti in da bi protidampinški ukrepi ta položaj še dodatno okrepili.
This statement is incorrect as significant import volumes from third countries are entering the Community market.
Ta trditev ni pravilna, saj se na trg Skupnosti uvažajo znatne količine iz tretjih držav.
Furthermore, the complainant Community producer was also competing with other producers in the Community.
Poleg tega je pritožnik proizvajalec Skupnosti konkuriral tudi z drugimi proizvajalci v Skupnosti.
Additionally, it should be noted that no evidence was submitted or was otherwise available indicating that the Community industry abused any alleged dominant position.
Obenem pa je treba opozoriti, da ni bilo predloženih ali drugače razpoložljivih nobenih dokazov o tem, da bi industrija Skupnosti zlorabljala domnevno prevladujoči položaj.
The overall positive economic situation of the complainant is partially explained by its ability to sell the product concerned, produced in the US and in the EU, at a higher unit price in the US market as the higher safety standard and the presence of a child proof device (the guard) on the product concerned allows the complainant to sell the product concerned at a higher price.
Splošno pozitivno gospodarsko stanje pritožnika delno pojasnjuje njegova zmožnost, da zadevni izdelek, ki se izdeluje v ZDA in EU, na trgu ZDA prodaja po višji ceni na enoto, in sicer na podlagi višjih varnostnih standardov in sistema, ki je varen za otroke.
Finally, it should be noted that flint lighters are massively represented in the US market and the relative growth of the lighter market, despite a constant reduction in the number of smokers, shows that the Community industry has been able to generate growth margins in a very competitive market.
Nazadnje je treba opozoriti, da so vžigalniki na kresilni kamen na trgu ZDA množično zastopani in da sorazmerna rast trga vžigalnikov kljub stalnemu zmanjševanju števila kadilcev kaže, da je industrija Skupnosti zmožna ustvariti stopnje rasti tudi na zelo konkurenčnem trgu.
Although continuation of material injury, caused by fraudulent declaration of the product concerned and by circumvention of the product concerned originating in the PRC via other Asian countries, is supported by the findings of OLAF (see recital (33)), the analysis focused on the likelihood of recurrence of injury.
Čeprav je nadaljevanje znatne škode, ki jo povzroča goljufivo deklariranje zadevnega izdelka in izogibanje ukrepom za zadevni izdelek s poreklom v LRK preko drugih azijskih držav, podprto z ugotovitvami OLAF (glej uvodno izjavo 33), se je analiza osredotočila na verjetnost ponovitve škode.
In this respect two main parameters were analysed: (1) possible shift of export volumes of the product concerned from the US in the Community market, (2) the effects of those projected volumes and prices from the country concerned on the Community industry.
V zvezi s tem sta bila analizirana dva glavna dejavnika: (1) možna preusmeritev obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka iz ZDA na trg Skupnosti, (2) vpliv predvidenih količin in cen iz zadevne države na industrijo Skupnosti.
Shift of export volumes from the US to the Community market
Preusmeritev obsega izvoza iz ZDA na trg Skupnosti
The decrease in market share of the Chinese lighters in the US shows that important volumes could be transferred to the EU market at a very low price.
Znižanje tržnega deleža kitajskih vžigalnikov v ZDA kaže, da bi se na trg EU lahko prenesle znatne količine po zelo nizki ceni.
Moreover, as mentioned above in recital (37) there are large production capacities of the product concerned available in the PRC which could be shifted to the EU.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 37, obstaja poleg tega v LRK za zadevni izdelek velika proizvodna zmogljivost, ki bi jo bilo mogoče preusmeriti v EU.
It is very likely that, should measures be repealed, imports originating in the PRC would probably be favoured with the perspective of higher price levels than in developing countries.
Glede na to, da so cene na trgu EU višje kot v državah v razvoju, obstaja velika verjetnost, da bi se uvoz s poreklom iz LRK v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov preusmeril v EU.
Effects of these imports in the Community
Vpliv tega uvoza na Skupnost
Should measures be allowed to lapse, it is clear that, given the lower price and existing capacities of Chinese exporting producers, most injury indicators (mainly sales volume, cost of production and profitability) of the Community industry would go down significantly.
Glede na nižje cene in obstoječe zmogljivosti kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je jasno, da bi se ob prenehanju veljavnosti ukrepov znatno poslabšala večina kazalnikov škode (predvsem obseg prodaje, stroški proizvodnje in dobičkonosnost).
Conclusion on the likelihood of recurrence of injury
Sklep o verjetnosti ponovitve škode
In view of the above and given that the injury margin calculated for the RIP was over 60 % and that imports from the PRC and Taiwan were undercutting the Community industry prices by an average of 39 % it is concluded that the repeal of the measures would in all likelihood result in the recurrence of material injury to the Community industry.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno in na to, da izračunana stopnja škode v OPP znaša več kot 60 % ter da je uvoz iz LRK in Tajvana nelojalno znižal cene industrije Skupnosti v povprečju za 39 %, se sklene, da bi razveljavitev ukrepov po vsej verjetnosti povzročila ponovitev znatne škode za industrijo Skupnosti.
One of the non-complainant Community producers contested above conclusions by alleging that since low priced lighters are imported from various other sources, the repeal of the current measures would not have any effect on the actual situation of the Community industry.
Eden od proizvajalcev Skupnosti, ki ni bil med pritožniki, je nasprotoval zgoraj navedenim sklepom z utemeljitvijo, da se poceni vžigalniki uvažajo od različnih virov, kar pomeni, da razveljavitev trenutno veljavnih ukrepov ne bi vplivala na dejansko stanje industrije Skupnosti.
It was argued that if any injury at all, it is already existent caused by the imports from these other sources.
Trdilo se je, da je bila škoda, če sploh obstaja, povzročena z uvozom od teh drugih virov.
However, this Community producer did not contest the availability of significant spare capacities in China and the incentive of the Chinese exporting producers to shift their exports to the Community market.
Vendar pa proizvajalec Skupnosti ni ugovarjal razpoložljivosti prostih zmogljivosti na Kitajskem in spodbudi kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov za preusmeritev izvoza na trg Skupnosti.
Likewise, it did not submit any information or evidence showing a link between the imports of lighters from other third countries and the impact on the Community industry’s financial situation.
Prav tako ni predložil nobenih informacij ali dokazov o povezavi med uvozom vžigalnikov iz drugih tretjih držav in vplivu na finančno stanje industrije Skupnosti.
None of the arguments brought forward could therefore devaluate the conclusions as outlined above in recitals (87) to (90).
Nobeden od navedenih argumentov torej ni mogel zmanjšati pomena sklepov iz uvodnih izjav 87 do 90.
In accordance with Article 21 of the basic Regulation it was examined whether a prolongation of the existing anti-dumping measures would be against the interest of the Community as a whole.
V skladu s členom 21 osnovne uredbe se je preučilo, ali bi bilo podaljšanje obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov proti interesu Skupnosti kot celote.
The determination of Community interest was based on the consideration of all the various interests involved, i.e. those of the Community industry and other Community producers and the importers of the product under consideration.
Interes Skupnosti je bil določen z upoštevanjem vseh različnih vključenih interesov, to je interesov industrije Skupnosti in drugih proizvajalcev Skupnosti ter uvoznikov obravnavanega izdelka.
It should be recalled that, in the previous investigations, the adoption of measures and their subsequent extension was consistently found not to be against the interest of the Community.
Treba je opozoriti, da je bilo v prejšnjih preiskavah ugotovljeno, da sprejetje ukrepov in njihovo naknadno podaljšanje ni v nasprotju z interesom Skupnosti.
On this basis it was examined whether, despite the conclusion that there exists a likelihood of recurrence of dumping and recurrence of injury, there are compelling reasons which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case.
Na podlagi tega se je preučilo, ali kljub sklepu o verjetnosti ponovitve dampinga in škode obstajajo nujni razlogi, na podlagi katerih bi bilo mogoče skleniti, da v tem primeru ohranitev ukrepov ni v interesu Skupnosti.
If the anti-dumping measures were repealed, dumped and low-priced imports on the Community market would massively increase and would accelerate the deterioration of the situation of the Community industry.
Če bi se protidampinški ukrepi odpravili, bi se dampinški in poceni uvoz na trgu Skupnosti močno povečal ter pospešil poslabšanje položaja industrije Skupnosti.
The Community industry is structurally viable, as shown by its positive result in non-EU markets, such as the US.
Industrija Skupnosti je strukturno sposobna preživeti, kot kažejo njeni pozitivni rezultati na trgih zunaj EU, kot npr. ZDA.
It has continuously made investments, which have been possible thanks to its high profitability.
Visoka dobičkonosnost ji je omogočala stalne naložbe.
However, it can be concluded that, without the continuation of anti-dumping measures, its situation will most likely deteriorate.
Vendar pa se lahko sklene, da bi se z odpravo protidampinških ukrepov njen položaj najverjetneje poslabšal.
One of the Community producers who did not submit a questionnaire reply claimed that the anti-dumping measures currently in force are detrimental to the European consumer.
Eden od proizvajalcev Skupnosti, ki niso predložili izpolnjenih vprašalnikov, je trdil, da so trenutno veljavni protidampinški ukrepi škodljivi za evropskega potrošnika.
In particular, this producer claimed that price levels in the Community are higher in comparison to other third markets due to the existing measures.
Navedeni proizvajalec je zlasti trdil, da so ravni cen v Skupnosti v primerjavi z drugimi tretjimi trgi višje zaradi obstoječih ukrepov.
Moreover, this producer, who has relocated part of its production to the PRC, claimed that since the existing measures are also applicable to its exports of the product concerned manufactured in China to the Community, these measures would be damaging the interests of this company and by definition would therefore be against the Community interest.
Poleg tega je ta proizvajalec, ki je del svoje proizvodnje preusmeril v LRK, trdil, da se obstoječi ukrepi uporabljajo tudi za njegov izvoz zadevnega izdelka, izdelanega na Kitajskem, v Skupnost, zato bi ti ukrepi škodovali interesom te družbe in bili zato tudi v nasprotju z interesi Skupnosti.
This producer also argued that, since the Community industry had not recovered, the existing measures were inefficient and should not be renewed.
Ta proizvajalec je tudi trdil, da so ukrepi neučinkoviti, glede na to, da industrija Skupnosti ni okrevala, zato se ne bi smeli podaljšati.
Finally, it was claimed that any injury was due the fact that the Community industry did not adapt to the new global market.
Nazadnje se je trdilo, da je za škodo krivo dejstvo, da se industrija Skupnosti ni prilagodila novemu svetovnemu trgu.
As regards the alleged negative impact of the measures for consumers, the Community producer concerned did not submit any evidence supporting this claim.
Glede domnevnega negativnega vpliva ukrepov na potrošnike pa proizvajalec Skupnosti ni predložil nobenih dokazov, ki bi trditev podprli.
This producer claimed that the anti-dumping measures constitute an obstacle to the development of its activities in China and have a negative impact on its expansion in the Far East, as well as a knock-on effect on its European production sites.
Ta proizvajalec je trdil, da protidampinški ukrepi ovirajo razvoj njegovih dejavnosti na Kitajskem in negativno vplivajo na njegovo širitev na Daljni vzhod, posredno pa tudi na njegove proizvodne obrate v Evropi.
This producer argued that the existing measure was negatively impacting on its overall profitability.
Navedeni proizvajalec je trdil, da ima obstoječi ukrep negativen vpliv na njegovo celotno dobičkonosnost.
However, the company indicated that it had recently increased its production in its EU facilities and continued to seek synergies with its production facilities in the Far East in order to broaden its product scope.
Vendar pa je družba navedla, da je nedavno povečala proizvodnjo v svojih obratih v EU in da še naprej išče sinergije s svojimi proizvodnimi obrati na Daljnem vzhodu, da bi razširila ponudbo izdelkov.
Therefore, the alleged negative impact of the measures on its production facilities in the EU could not be verified.
Zato domnevnega negativnega vpliva ukrepov na njegove proizvodne obrate v EU ni bilo mogoče preveriti.
The Community producer in question denied that it relocated its production and claimed instead that it simply built additional production lines in China producing different product types than in the Community, thus enlarging its product range.
Zadevni proizvajalec Skupnosti je zanikal premestitev svoje proizvodnje in trdil, da je na Kitajskem zgradil zgolj dodatne proizvodne linije, kjer izdeluje drugačne vrste izdelkov kot v Skupnosti, s čimer je razširil svojo ponudbo izdelkov.
This allegedly favoured the production in the Community which increased.
To je domnevno ugodno vplivalo na proizvodnjo v Skupnosti, ki se je povečala.
As already mentioned this producer did not submit any questionnaire reply and did thus not sufficiently cooperate in the present proceeding.
Kot že omenjeno, navedeni proizvajalec ni izpolnil vprašalnika in s tem ni zadostno sodeloval v sedanjem postopku.
None of the information submitted, partly outside the requested deadlines, could therefore be verified.
Zato nobene od informacij, delno predloženih zunaj zahtevanih rokov, ni bilo mogoče preveriti.
Furthermore, the producer did not explain or show any link between the built-up of the production in China and the increase in production in the Community as claimed.
Poleg tega proizvajalec ni pojasnil ali dokazal svoje trditve o kakršni koli povezavi med vzpostavitvijo proizvodnje na Kitajskem in povečanjem proizvodnje v Skupnosti.
No such link was apparent on the basis of the information included in the file.
Iz informacij v dokumentaciji taka povezava ni bila razvidna.
It could also not explain how these facts would have an impact on the conclusions outlined in recital (100) above or devaluate these conclusions.
Ni bilo tudi mogoče pojasniti, kako bi ta dejstva vplivala na sklepe iz uvodne izjave 100 ali zmanjšala njihov pomen.
This argument had therefore to be rejected.
To trditev je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
Likewise, this company’s imports should not be allowed to benefit from dumping at the expense of the Community industry.
Prav tako se ne bi smelo dopustiti, da se uvoz te družbe okorišča z dampingom na račun industrije Skupnosti.
In any case, it should be noted that the remaining production site of this producer in the Community only produces the product concerned.
V vsakem primeru je treba opozoriti, da preostali proizvodni obrat tega proizvajalca v Skupnosti proizvaja samo zadevni izdelek.
New smaller flint lighters, which are also subject to the existing measure, are produced in China and India.
Novi, manjši vžigalniki na kresilni kamen, za katere tudi veljajo obstoječi ukrepi, se proizvajajo na Kitajskem in v Indiji.
With regard to the interests of the other Community producers, both came forward and objected to the existing measures and their continuation.
Glede na interese drugih proizvajalcev Skupnosti, sta oba proizvajalca nasprotovala obstoječim ukrepom in njihovemu nadaljevanju.
However, they could not substantiate their objections with any evidence of the measures having a detrimental effect on them.
Vendar pa svojih nasprotovanj nista mogla utemeljiti z nobenim dokazom o tem, da ukrepi nanju škodljivo vplivajo.
On the basis of the above, it was concluded that the measures in force would not have a significant, negative impact on the other Community producers and would not significantly adversely affect their financial interests.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je bilo sklenjeno, da veljavni ukrepi ne bi imeli bistvenega negativnega vpliva na druge proizvajalce Skupnosti in ne bi bistveno škodili njihovim finančnim interesom.
Interests of importers and traders
Interesi uvoznikov in trgovcev