natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Ministry required that the cities wishing to set up the planned joint ventures select their partner through an open competitive tender.
Ministrstvo je zahtevalo, da mesta, ki želijo ustanoviti načrtovane mešane družbe, svoje partnerje izberejo s konkurenčnim javnim razpisom.
The Commission rejects the complainants’ allegation according to which Tieliikelaitos would have been using predatory pricing practices during the transitional period or in 2005.
Komisija zavrača obtožbe pritožnikov, da naj bi podjetje Tieliikelaitos v prehodnem obdobju ali leta 2005 uporabljalo nepoštene prakse oblikovanja cen.
The information provided by the Finnish authorities shows that Tieliikelaitos had positive margins from the tendered contracts it entered into.
Informacije, ki so jih predložili finski organi, kažejo, da je podjetje Tieliikelaitos doseglo pozitivne marže pri izvedenih naročilih, oddanih po odprtem postopku.
In fact, the Commission notes that the level of Tieliikelaitos profit during the transitional period would have corresponded to the average of its competitors if it did not have non-compensated additional costs (EUR 65 million — see Section 7.1.2) resulting from the legacy of the previous regime.
Komisija dejansko ugotavlja, da bi višina dobička podjetja Tieliikelaitos v prehodnem obdobju ustrezala povprečju njegovih konkurentov, če podjetje ne bi imelo nenadomeščenih dodatnih stroškov (65 milijonov EUR – glej oddelek 7.1.2), ki izhajajo iz prejšnje ureditve.
In the light of the above, the Commission concludes that, on balance, the examined new aid measures, which were transitory in nature since they were linked to the transitional period, are compatible with the common market, since they are necessary and proportionate to an objective of common interest and do not distort trade and competition to an extent contrary to the common interest.
V skladu z navedenim Komisija sklepa, da so preučeni novi ukrepi pomoči, ki so bili prehodnega značaja, ker so bili povezani s prehodnim obdobjem, skladni s skupnim trgom, ker so potrebni in sorazmerni za cilj skupnega interesa ter trgovine in konkurence ne izkrivljajo v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
This conclusion is in line with the Commission’s decision practice, notably in the OTE and EDF cases.
Ta sklep je v skladu s prakso odločitev Komisije, zlasti v zadevah OTE in EDF.
In EDF, the Commission declared compatible a measure by which the French State relieved enterprises in the French electricity and gas sectors of the payment of some of the specific pension rights the employees had acquired in the past, at a time when companies were operating under a legal monopoly.
V zadevi EDF je Komisija za združljiv ukrep opredelila ukrep, s katerim je Francija podjetja v francoskem sektorju električne energije in plinarn oprostila plačila nekaterih posebnih pokojninskih pravic, ki so jih zaposleni pridobili v preteklosti, ko so podjetja imela zakoniti monopol.
The Commission considered that at that time the companies were shielded from any intra-industry competition and could thus bear the higher pension rights without suffering any significant economic disadvantage.
Komisija je menila, da so bila podjetja takrat zaščitena pred notranjo konkurenco panoge, zato so lahko krila višje pokojninske dajatve, ne da bi pri tem utrpela znatno gospodarsko škodo.
The Commission acknowledged, that these ‘past liabilities’ represented a significant difficulty for these enterprises, once they were operating in competition with other electricity or gas enterprises that did not have to bear similar costs from the past (par. 143 of the Decision).
Komisija je priznala, da so ti „pretekli stroški“ za ta podjetja pomenili velike težave, ko so ta začela konkurirati z drugimi podjetji za električno energijo in plinarnami, ki niso imela podobnih stroškov iz preteklosti (odstavek 143 Sklepa).
The Commission regarded the aid granted ‘with the view to such sectoral reorganization’ as necessary and proportionate on the grounds that the other aspects of the sectoral reform did not involve any State aid (paragraph 146 of the Decision).
Komisija je pomoč, dodeljeno „zaradi te sektorske reorganizacije“, označila za potrebno in sorazmerno zato, ker ostali vidiki sektorske reforme ne vsebujejo elementov državne pomoči (odstavek 146 Sklepa).
In the present case, similarly, the overstaffing that burdened Tieliikelaitos was inherited from the pre-liberalisation period; the measures contributed to alleviate that burden in a proportionate manner and to allow Tieliikelaitos to participate fully in the competitive process, and hence take part in the reorganisation of the road services sector.
V sedanjem primeru je preveliko število zaposlenih, ki je obremenjevalo podjetje Tieliikelaitos, prav tako izhajalo iz obdobja pred liberalizacijo; ukrepi so prispevali k ublažitvi tega bremena na sorazmeren način ter podjetju Tieliikelaitos omogočili, da se popolnoma vključi v konkurenčni proces in sodeluje pri preoblikovanju sektorja cestnih storitev.
In OTE, where the Commission explicitly referred back to the EDF decision, the Commission assessed the Greek government’s contribution to the Hellenic Telecommunication Operator’s (OTE) voluntary early retirement scheme.
V zadevi OTE, pri kateri se je Komisija izrecno sklicevala na predhodni sklep o EDF, je Komisija ocenjevala prispevek grške vlade v shemi prostovoljnega predčasnega upokojevanja grškega telekomunikacijskega operaterja (OTE).
Due to the life tenure status of OTE employees, which was inherited from the time when OTE had a monopoly position, OTE could not unilaterally dismiss personnel, but had to have recourse to voluntary redundancy offers.
Zaradi stalnega statusa zaposlenih OTE, ki je izhajalo iz obdobja, ko je imela družba OTE monopolni položaj, družba ni mogla enostransko odpustiti osebja, temveč je morala ponuditi sheme prostovoljnega predčasnega upokojevanja.
To make such offers attractive, OTE had to offer its employees voluntary redundancy terms and conditions that reflect the latter’s permanent status, which, in turn, led to higher costs for OTE than the costs of comparable early retirement schemes offered by other companies under general labour laws and regulations.
Da bi bile takšne ponudbe privlačne, je morala družba zaposlenim ponuditi pogoje za prostovoljno upokojitev, ki ima trajni status zaposlenih, kar je družbi OTE povzročilo višje stroške, kot so bili stroški primerljivih shem predčasnega upokojevanja, ki so jih ponujale druge družbe v skladu s splošno delovno zakonodajo in ureditvami.
The Commission verified that the respective aid measure would only partially compensate for the extraordinary costs caused by the structural disadvantages resulting from OTE’s former position as State-owned monopoly, and that the burden was not associated with directly related advantages of its former status that would mitigate it.
Komisija je potrdila, da bi zadevni ukrep pomoči le delno nadomestil izredne stroške, nastale zaradi strukturnih pomanjkljivosti, ki so izhajale iz nekdanjega položaja družbe OTE kot monopolista v državni lasti, in da breme ni bilo povezano z neposrednimi prednostmi zaradi njenega prejšnjega statusa, ki bi breme zmanjšale.
The Commission also assessed whether the relevant market was fully liberalised in the sense that an appropriate legal or regulatory framework existed and concluded that the aid measure was compatible with Article 87(3) of the EC Treaty.
Komisija je tudi preučevala, ali je bil zadevni trg v celoti liberaliziran v smislu, da je bil na voljo ustrezen pravni ali regulativni okvir, in ugotovila, da je bil ukrep pomoči skladen s členom 87(3) Pogodbe ES.
In the present case, the overall compensation obtained by Tieliikelaitos does not go beyond the burden derived from the overstaffing, which is not compensated through other advantage, and the market development point to a development of effective competition in the relevant market.
V tem primeru celotno nadomestilo, ki ga je prejelo podjetje Tieliikelaitos, ne presega bremena, ki izhaja iz prevelikega števila zaposlenih, ki ni bilo nadomeščeno z drugimi prednostmi, hkrati pa razvoj zadevnega trga potrjuje učinkovito konkurenco.
In the light of the above considerations, the Commission considers that the aid provided during the transitional period (2001 to 2004) to Tieliikelaitos is compatible with the common market on the basis of Article 87(3) c of the EC Treaty.
Glede na navedeno Komisija meni, da je pomoč, ki je bila v prehodnem obdobju (2001 — 2004) dodeljena podjetju Tieliikelaitos, skladna s skupnim trgom na podlagi člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES.
At the same time the Commission considers that the continuation of exemptions from the application of normal bankruptcy law and corporate income tax rules are not justified and that such derogations have therefore to be abolished.
Komisija hkrati meni, da nadaljnje izjeme od uporabe običajne stečajne zakonodaje in pravil za obdavčevanje dobička pravnih oseb niso upravičene ter da je zato treba takšno odstopanje odpraviti –
State aid provided to Tieliikelaitos on a transitional basis and consisting of the following measures:
Državna pomoč, ki je bila prehodno dodeljena podjetju Tieliikelaitos in jo sestavljajo naslednji ukrepi:
preferential State credit in the amount of EUR 41,44 million granted at the time of transformation of undertaking from the production part of the Road Service into the State Enterprise,
prednostno državno posojilo v vrednosti 41,44 milijona EUR, dodeljeno v obdobju preoblikovanja podjetja iz proizvodnega dela službe za ceste v državno podjetje,
aid amounting to EUR 9,5 million provided through negotiated contracts for services/works contracts with respect to State roads during the period 2001-2004,
pomoč v znesku 9,5 milijona EUR, zagotovljena z naročili storitev/del v zvezi z državnimi cestami v obdobju 2001–2004, oddanimi po postopku s pogajanji,
aid provided through Special service projects for employment of excess staff of Tieliikelaitos, which were financed by the Road administration at the level of EUR 68 million,
pomoč, zagotovljena s posebnimi storitvenimi projekti za zaposlitev odvečnega osebja podjetja Tieliikelaitos, ki jih je financirala cestna uprava v višini 68 milijonov EUR,
staff adjustment measures financed by the Road administration at the level of EUR 20,1 million (measures helping employees to find new jobs, financing supplementary education and retraining and supporting pensions for early retirement),
prilagoditveni ukrepi za osebje, ki jih je financirala cestna uprava v višini 20,1 milijona EUR (ukrepi za pomoč zaposlenim pri iskanju nove zaposlitve, za financiranje dodatnega izobraževanja in preusposabljanja ter za pokojnine pri predčasni upokojitvi),
possible aid related to the land and gravel sites put at the disposal of Tieliikelaitos
morebitna pomoč za zemljo in gramozni teren, ki ju je imelo na voljo podjetje Tieliikelaitos;
is compatible with the common market on the basis of Article 87(3)(c) EC.
je na podlagi člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES skladna s skupnim trgom.
Existing aid measures for the benefit of Tieliikelaitos consisting of inapplicability of bankruptcy legislation, inapplicability of normal corporate income tax and the fiscal aid measure related to land purchase by Tieliikelaitos are not compatible with the common market.
Veljavni ukrepi pomoči, ki se izvajajo v korist podjetju Tieliikelaitos, tj. neuporaba stečajne zakonodaje, neuporaba običajnega davka od dobička pravnih oseb in davčni ukrep pomoči za nakup zemlje s strani podjetja Tieliikelaitos, niso skladni s skupnim trgom.
Those existing aid measures which are still in force (inapplicability of bankruptcy legislation and inapplicability of normal corporate income tax) have to be repealed by 1 March 2008 at the latest in accordance with the commitment provided by the Finnish authorities.
Te obstoječe ukrepe pomoči, ki se še vedno izvajajo (neuporaba stečajne zakonodaje in neuporaba običajnega davka od dobička pravnih oseb), je treba razveljaviti najpozneje do 1. marca 2008 v skladu z zavezo finskih organov.
This Decision is addressed to Finland.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Finsko.
Finland shall inform the Commission, within two months following notification of this decision, of the measures already taken and planned to comply with it.
Finska v dveh mesecih po razglasitvi te odločbe obvesti Komisijo o ukrepih, ki jih je sprejela ali jih namerava sprejeti za uskladitev s to odločbo.
OJ C 274, 10.11.2006, p. 2.
UL C 274, 10.11.2006, str. 2.
Act 1185/2002 adopted on 20 December 2002.
Zakon št. 1185/2002, sprejet 20. decembra 2002.
The Road Service was divided internally into two parts: the Road administration and the Road Production, the latter one taking care of road design, construction and maintenance.
Cestna služba je bila notranje razdeljena na dva dela: cestno upravo in oddelek za gradnjo cest, ki je skrbel za načrtovanje, gradnjo in vzdrževanje cest.
The service which today is tendered out through 84 regional contracts covering the whole of Finland
Ta storitev se danes izvaja v celotni Finski s 84 regionalnimi pogodbami, ki so bile sklenjene na podlagi objavljenih razpisov.
Act 569/2000 adopted on 16 June 2000 (amended by Act 1081/2003 adopted on 15 December 2003).
Zakon št. 569/2000, sprejet 16. junija 2000 (spremenjen z zakonom št. 1081/2003, sprejetim 15. decembra 2003).
Decree 660/2000 adopted on 29 June 2000.
Uredba št. 660/2000, sprejeta 29. junija 2000.
Act 1080/1991 adopted on 22 July 1991.
Zakon št. 1080/1991, sprejet 22. julija 1991.
Government bill 25/2000 whereby proposals for the Act governing Tieliikelaitos and the Act governing the Road administration were submitted to the Parliament.
Vladni predlog zakona št. 25/2000, s katerim so bili parlamentu predloženi predlogi zakona o upravljanju podjetja Tieliikelaitos in zakona o upravljanju cest.
The Working Group included representatives of the Road Administration, private earthworks contractors, the Competition Authority and the Competition council.
Delovna skupina je vključevala predstavnike cestne uprave, zasebnih izvajalcev za zemeljska dela, organa za konkurenco in sveta za konkurenco.
Given the way the formation of a negotiated price takes place, for the time being it is lower than the market price would have been (the agreement price for the previous year is taken as a starting point for determining negotiated price; thereafter it is adjusted taking into account changes in the cost level and the content and quality of the service).
Vzrok za to je oblikovanje dogovorjene cene, ki je zdaj nižja od tržne cene (cena iz sporazuma za prejšnje leto se šteje kot izhodišče za določanje dogovorjene cene, nato pa se prilagodi, pri čemer se upoštevajo spremembe ravni stroškov, vsebine in kakovosti storitve).
Section 5 of the State Enterprise Act — Act 1185/2002 adopted on 20 December 2002.
razdelek Zakona o državnih podjetjih – zakon št. 1185/2002, sprejet 20. decembra 2002.
Act 1988/449 adopted on 20 May 1988 (last amended by Act 2001/1110 adopted on 30 November 2001).
Zakon št. 1988/449, sprejet 20. maja 1988 (spremenjen z zakonom št. 2001/1110, sprejetim 30. novembra 2001).
Decree 20/2003 as amended by Decree 25/2005.
Uredba št. 20/2003, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo št. 25/2005.
Act 1992/1535 adopted on 30 December 1992.
Zakon št. 1992/1535, sprejet 30. decembra 1992.
Act 1535/1992.
Zakon št. 1535/1992.
In their 22 June 2006 submission the complainants refer to EUR 15 million, but from their earlier submissions and the data provided by the Finnish authorities it appears that the right amount is FIM 15 million.
V dopisu z dne 22. junija 2006 pritožniki navajajo 15 milijonov EUR, vendar je na podlagi predhodnih predložitev in podatkov, ki so jih zagotovili finski organi, pravilni znesek verjetno 15 milijonov FIM.
Cf. Section 2.4.3.
Glej oddelek 2.4.3.
Plan-and-implement contracts are contracts where design services and construction works are procured as one package.
Naročila „načrtovanja in izvajanja“ so naročila, pri katerih se storitve načrtovanja in gradbena dela izvajajo v paketu.
Act 120/2004 adopted on 20 February 2004 (last amended by Act 709/2007 adopted on 15 June 2007).
Zakon št. 120/2004, sprejet 20. februarja 2004 (spremenjen z zakonom št. 709/2007, sprejetim 15. junija 2007).
Source: Bloomberg.
Vir: Bloomberg.
Commission Communication on State aid elements in sales of land and buildings by public authorities, OJ C 209, 10 July 1997, paragraph 2.
Sporočilo Komisije o elementih državne pomoči pri prodaji zemljišč in objektov s strani javnih oblasti, UL C 209, 10.7.1997, odstavek 2.
Downwards revision from EUR 21,5 million to EUR 19 million.
Znižanje z 21,5 milijona EUR na 19 milijonov EUR.
Difference in margins remaining after the annual expenditure adjustment procedure.
Razlike v maržah, ki so ostale po letnem postopku prilagajanja izdatkov.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 March 2004 in the case T-157/01, Danske Busvognmaend v. Commission.
Sodba sodišča prve stopnje z dne 16. marca 2004 v zadevi T–157/01, Danske Busvognmaend proti Komisiji.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in the case C-280/00, Altmark Trans, judgment of 24 July 2003.
Sodba Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zadevi C–280/00, Altmark Trans, sodba z dne 24. julija 2003.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in the case C-251/97, France v Commission, judgment of 5 October 1999.
Sodba Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zadevi C–251/97, Francija proti Komisiji, sodba z dne 5. oktobra 1999.
inter alia Finland refers to Joined Cases C-72/91 and C-73/91, Sloman Neptun Schiffarts AG v. Seebetriebsrat Bodo Ziesemer, judgment of 17 March 1993.
Finska se med drugim sklicuje na združeni zadevi C–72/91 in C–73/91, Sloman Neptun Schiffarts AG proti Seebetriebsrat Bodo Ziesemer, sodba z dne 17. marca 1993.
The Act was adopted on 30 December 1992.
Zakon je bil sprejet 30. decembra 1992.
Act 728/2004
Zakon št. 728/2004.
Acts 1240/1988 and 1043/1974.
Zakona št. 1240/1988 in 1043/1974.
With this cost structure, annual sales of EUR 3 million yield EUR 0,4 million operating margin.
S takšno strukturo stroškov letna prodaja v višini 3 milijonov EUR ustvari 0,4 milijona dobička iz poslovanja.
Includes an estimate of uncompensated costs of personnel arrangements to reduce the overstaffing problem and the size of the burden due to extra personnel as well as the foregone income (EUR 1,6 million) due to the restrictions imposed on trading in mineral aggregates.
Vključujejo oceno nenadomeščenih stroškov v zvezi z ureditvami za osebje zaradi reševanja težave prevelikega števila zaposlenih in zmanjšanja bremena zaradi dodatnega osebja ter oceno izgubljenega dohodka (1,6 milijona EUR) zaradi omejitev v zvezi s prodajo mineralnih agregatov.
Winter maintenance, maintenance of the traffic environment, maintenance of gravel roads, etc.
Zimsko vzdrževanje, vzdrževanje prometnega okolja, vzdrževanje gramoznih cest itd.
Anti-skid measures, snowploughing, road levelling, snow bank removal and traffic sign cleaning.
Ukrepi prosti drsenju, pluženje snega, izravnava cest, odstranitev snežnih zametov in čiščenje prometnih znakov.
upkeep of traffic signs, road markings, etc.
Vzdrževanje prometnih znakov, cestnih oznak itd.
Companies with much higher turnover than the one of Tieliikelaitos.
Družbi z veliko večjim prometom, kot ga ima podjetje Tieliikelaitos.
XXXth Report on Competition Policy (2000), p. 128; Lisbon European Council, 23-24 March 2000, Presidency Conclusions, SN 100/00; Communication to the Spring European Council, COM(2005) 24, p. 21, Brussels, 2 February 2005; Green Paper on Services of General Interest, COM(2003) 270 final, paragraph 5, Brussels, 21 May 2003.
Poročilo o konkurenčni politiki št. XXX (2000), str. 128; zasedanje Evropskega sveta v Lizboni, 23. in 24. marca 2000, sklepi predsedstva, SN 100/00; Sporočilo spomladanskemu Evropskemu svetu, COM(2005) 24, str. 21, Bruselj, 2. februar 2005; Zelena knjiga o storitvah splošnega pomena, COM(2003) 270 konč., odstavek 5, Bruselj, 21. maj 2003.
Judgment of the Court of 24 July 2003 in Case C-280/00 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht): Altmark Trans GmbH, Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH) [2003] ECR I-7747
Sodba Sodišča z dne 24. julija 2003 v zadevi C–280/00 (referenca za predhodno odločanje z Zveznega upravnega sodišča (Bundesverwaltungsgericht)): Altmark Trans GmbH in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg proti Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH), [2003], Recueil, str. I–7747.
Obligations stemming from the Act governing Tieliikelaitos and the Emergency Powers Act.
Obveznosti določata Zakon o upravljanju podjetja Tieliikelaitos in Zakon o pristojnostih v izrednih razmerah.
See Commission’s Decision of 28 November 2005 on the application of Article 86(2) of the EC treaty to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest C(2005)2673, OJ L312, 29.11.2005, p. 67-73, at recital 7.
Glej Odločbo Komisije z dne 28. novembra 2005 o uporabi člena 86(2) Pogodbe ES za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, dodeljene nekaterim podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena C(2005) 2673, UL L 312, 29.11.2005, str. 67, uvodna izjava 7.
From the information provided by the Finnish authorities, it appears that after the end of the transitional period emergency preparations at the service group and headquarters levels as well as training measures require the annual expense of EUR 0,5 million, including all incidental expenses.
Iz podatkov, ki so jih predložili finski organi, je razvidno, da so bili po koncu prehodnega obdobja za priprave storitvene skupine in uprave na izredne razmere ter za ukrepe usposabljanja potrebni letni stroški 0,5 milijona EUR, vključno z vsemi dodatnimi stroški.
Given the value of Tieliikelaitos annual turnover, this sum does not appear excessive.
Glede na letni promet podjetja Tieliikelaitos ta vsota ni previsoka.
Case 173/73 Italy v Commission [1974] ECR 709, paragraph 26.
Zadeva 173/73, Italija proti Komisiji, [1974], Recueil, str. 709, točka 26.
Case C-387/92 Banco Exterior de España [1994] ECR I-877, paragraphs 12 and 13; and Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans and Regierungs presidium Magdeburg [2003] ECR I-000, paragraph 84 and the case-law cited therein.
Zadeva C-387/92, Banco Exterior de España, [1994], Recueil, str. I–877, točki 12 in 13, in zadeva C-280/00, Altmark Trans in Regierungs presidium Magdeburg, [2003], Recueil, str. I–000, točka 84, in tam navedena sodna praksa.
See e.g. point 42 of the Commission communication to the Member States — Application of Articles 92 and 93 of the EEC Treaty and of Article 5 of Commission Directive 80/723/EEC to public undertakings in the manufacturing sector, JO C 307 du 13. 11. 1993, p. 3).
Glej npr. točko 42 Sporočila Komisije državam članicam o uporabi členov 92 in 93 Pogodbe EGS in člena 5 Direktive Komisije 80/723/EGS za javna podjetja v proizvodnem sektorju (UL C 307, 13.11.1993, str. 3).
See also point 76 of Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 30 April 1998 in Case T-16/96 — Cityflyer Express Ltd v Commission of the European Communities.
Glej tudi točko 76 sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 30. aprila 1998 v zadevi T–16/96, Cityflyer Express Ltd proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti.
The data from the 31.05.2006 submission of the Finnish authorities
Podatki, ki so jih finski organi predložili 31. maja 2006.