natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Thus, the tax reduction is applicable in geographical areas (communes) fulfilling the following alternative criteria: (i) communes falling within climate zone F as defined in the Presidential Decree No 412 of 1993 [2], that is communes with more than 3000‘day degrees’; (ii) communes falling within zone E as defined in the Presidential Decree No 412 of 1993, that is communes with 2100 to 3000‘day degrees’ [3]; and (iii) Sardinia and small islands (all Italian islands apart from Sicily).
Tako se znižani davki uporabljajo na geografskih območjih (v občinah), ki izpolnjujejo eno od naslednjih meril: (i) občine, ki spadajo v podnebno cono F, kot je določena v Predsedniškem odloku št. 412 iz leta 1993 [2], torej občine z več kot 3000„dnevnimi stopinjami“; (ii) občine, ki spadajo v podnebno cono E, kot je določena v Predsedniškem odloku št. 412 iz leta 1993, torej občine z 2100 do 3000„dnevnimi stopinjami“ [3], ter (iii) Sardinija in manjši otoki (vsi italijanski otoki razen Sicilije).
Since the development of the natural gas network would to an important extent reduce the additional heating costs and would in particular improve the variety of options between fuels, available to consumers, the reduction will no longer apply in communes belonging to the second and third areas mentioned once the natural gas network is completed in the commune concerned.
Ker bi razvoj napeljave zemeljskega plina znatno znižal dodatne stroške ogrevanja, zlasti pa povečal izbiro goriv, ki so na voljo potrošnikom, se znižanje ne bo več uporabljalo v občinah, ki spadajo v drugo in tretje območje, ko bo napeljava zemeljskega plina v zadevni občini dokončana.
The common feature of the communes in question is the additional heating costs as compared to the rest of Italy.
V primerjavi z drugimi območji Italije so tem območjem skupni dodatni stroški ogrevanja.
For climate zones E and F, the tax reduction equals on average 11 to 12 % of the price of gas oil and LPG for heating purposes.
Za podnebni coni E in F znaša znižanje davkov povprečno 11-12 % cene plinskega olja in utekočinjenega naftnega plina za ogrevanje.
The average heating costs are, due to climate conditions, 90 % higher than the national average in climate zone E and 170 % higher than the national average in climate zone F. For the islands, the additional heating costs, as compared to mainland Italy, are due to the geographical particularities of the islands, restricted fuel supply and additional transport costs, and to the higher fuel prices as a consequence, as compared to mainland Italy.
Povprečni stroški ogrevanja so zaradi podnebnih razmer v podnebni coni E 90 %, v podnebni coni F pa 170 % višji od nacionalnega povprečja. Na otokih so stroški ogrevanja višji kot v celinskem delu Italije zaradi geografskih posebnosti otokov, omejene preskrbe z gorivom in zaradi dodatnih stroškov prevoza, zato je tu cena goriv višja kot v celinskem delu Italije.
The tax reduction remains in all cases below the additional heating costs borne by the population concerned, so that there is no overcompensation in the matter.
Znižanje davka je v vseh primerih nižje kot dodatni stroški ogrevanja, ki jih imajo zadevni prebivalci, tako da to ne povzroča prekomerne kompenzacije.
In particular the Italian authorities have stated that the tax reduction does not go beyond the extra costs incurred in zones E and F due to the colder climate. Furthermore, as far as the islands are concerned, the authorities have stated that the tax reduction does not drive the price of the fuels in question below the price of the same fuel on the mainland.
Italijanski organi so zlasti navedli, da znižanje davka ne presega dodatnih stroškov zaradi hladnega podnebja v conah E in F; poleg tega so v zvezi z otoki navedli, da znižanje davka cene zadevnih goriv ne zniža pod ceno istega goriva v celinskem delu Italije.
The reduced rate of taxation remains both for gas oil and LPG higher than the Community minimum levels of taxation laid down in Directive 2003/96/EC.
Znižana stopnja obdavčitve je za plinsko olje in utekočinjeni naftni plin višja od minimalne stopnje obdavčitve Skupnosti, določene v Direktivi 2003/96/ES.
The measure in question applies only to the heating of rooms (both for private individuals and businesses).
Zadevni ukrep se nanaša samo na ogrevanje prostorov (namenjenih posameznikom ali podjetjem).
It does not apply for other forms of business use of the said products.
Ne uporablja se za druge oblike poslovne uporabe navedenih proizvodov.
The measure has been found not to distort competition or hinder the operation of the internal market and it is not considered incompatible with Community policy on the environment, energy and transport.
Za ukrep je bilo ugotovljeno, da ne izkrivlja konkurence ali ovira delovanja notranjega trga ter se ne šteje za nezdružljivega s politiko Skupnosti na področjih okolja, energetike in prometa.
Italy should therefore be authorised, pursuant to Article 19(2) of Directive 2003/96/EC, to apply a reduced rate of taxation to gas oil and LPG used for heating purposes in certain geographical areas characterised by a high level of heating costs, as indicated in the Annex to this Decision, until 31 December 2012.
Italiji bi bilo zato treba v skladu s členom 19(2) Direktive 2003/96/ES do 31. decembra 2012 dovoliti uporabo znižane stopnje obdavčitve za plinsko olje in utekočinjeni naftni plin za ogrevanje na nekaterih geografskih območjih z visokimi stroški ogrevanja, ki so določena v Prilogi k tej odločbi.
It should be ensured that Italy can apply the specific reduction to which this Decision relates seamlessly following on from the situation existing before 1 January 2007, under Article 18 of Directive 2003/96/EC read in conjunction with Annex II thereto.
Treba bi bilo zagotoviti, da lahko Italija v skladu s členom 18 v povezavi s Prilogo II k Direktivi 2003/96/ES uporablja posebno znižanje, ki ga obravnava ta odločba, neprekinjeno in na podlagi razmer, ki so obstajale pred 1. januarjem 2007.
The authorisation requested should therefore be granted with effect from 1 January 2007,
Zato bi bilo treba dodeliti zahtevano dovoljenje z učinkom od 1. januarja 2007 –
Italy is hereby authorised to apply reduced rates of taxation to gas oil and LPG used for room heating purposes in certain geographical areas characterised by a high level of heating costs, as specified in the Annex.
Italiji se dovoli uporaba znižane stopnje obdavčitve za plinsko olje in utekočinjeni naftni plin za ogrevanje prostorov na nekaterih geografskih območjih z visokimi stroški ogrevanja, kot so določena v Prilogi.
In order to avoid any overcompensation, the reduction must not go beyond the additional heating costs incurred in the areas in question.
V izogib prekomerni kompenzaciji znižanje ne sme presegati dodatnih stroškov, ki jih imajo prebivalci zadevnih območij.
The reduced rate shall comply with the requirements of Directive 2003/96/EC, and in particular the minimum levels of taxation laid down in Article 9 thereof.
Znižana raven je skladna z zahtevami Direktive 2003/96/ES in zlasti z najnižjo stopnjo obdavčitve iz člena 9 navedene direktive.
Consumption in communes situated in the areas referred to in point 2 or point 3 of the Annex hereto shall be eligible only as long as the commune concerned lacks a natural gas network.
Poraba v občinah, ki se nahajajo na območjih iz točke 2 in točke 3 Priloge k tej odločbi, je upravičena le, dokler v zadevni občini ni napeljave zemeljskega plina.
Directive as amended by Directive 2004/75/EC (OJ L 157, 30.4.2004, p. 100).
Direktiva, kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 2004/75/ES (UL L 157, 30.4.2004, str. 100).
This decree divides the Italian territory into six climate zones (A to F).
Odlok deli ozemlje Italije na šest podnebnih con (A do F).
The classification is based on the unit ‘day degrees’ which represents for the conventional heating period the sum of daily average temperatures differing from the optimal 20 °C.
Razvrstitev temelji na enoti „dnevne stopinje“, ki v običajnem obdobju, ko je potrebno ogrevanje, predstavlja vsoto dnevne povprečne temperature, ki odstopa od optimalnih 20 °C.
The higher the number attributed to a commune, the lower is the average outside temperature during the heating period.
Višja je številka, določena za občino, nižja je povprečna zunanja temperatura v obdobju, ko je potrebno ogrevanje.
The remaining climate zones are defined in terms of ‘day degrees’ as follows: Zone A (below 600), Zone B (above 600, but not exceeding 900), Zone C (above 900, but not exceeding 1400) and Zone D (above 1400, but not exceeding 2100).
Druge podnebne cone so glede na „dnevne stopinje“ opredeljene takole: cona A (manj kot 600), cona B (med 600 in 900), cona C (med 900 in 1400) in cona D (med 1400 in 2100).
Geographical areas concerned by the Decision
Geografska območja, ki jih zadeva ta odločba:
communes falling within climate zone F as established by the Presidential Decree of 26 August 1993 No 412,
občine, ki spadajo v podnebno cono F, kot je določena v Predsedniškem odloku št. 412 z dne 26. avgusta 1993,
communes falling within climate zone E as established by the Presidential Decree of 26 August 1993 No 412,
občine, ki spadajo v podnebno cono E, kot je določena v Predsedniškem odloku št. 412 z dne 26. avgusta 1993,
communes in Sardinia and in small islands (all Italian islands, except Sicily).
občine na Sardiniji in manjših otokih (vsi italijanski otoki razen Sicilije).
amending Decision 2000/265/EC on the establishment of a financial regulation governing the budgetary aspects of the management by the Deputy Secretary-General of the Council, of contracts concluded in his name, on behalf of certain Member States, relating to the installation and the functioning of the communication infrastructure for the Schengen environment, ‘Sisnet’
o spremembi Sklepa 2000/265/ES o vzpostavitvi finančne uredbe za urejanje proračunskih vidikov upravljanja pogodb s strani namestnika generalnega sekretarja Sveta, sklenjenih v imenu nekaterih držav članic v zvezi s postavitvijo in delovanjem komunikacijske infrastrukture za schengensko okolje „Sisnet“
Having regard to the Protocol integrating the Schengen acquis into the framework of the European Union, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the first sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 2(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Protokola, ki vključuje schengenski pravni red v okvir Evropske unije, priloženega Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, in zlasti prvega stavka drugega pododstavka člena 2(1) Protokola,
The Deputy Secretary-General of the Council was authorised by Decision 1999/870/EC [1] and Decision 2007/149/EC [2] to act, in the context of the integration of the Schengen acquis within the European Union, as representative of certain Member States for the purposes of concluding contracts relating to the installation and the functioning of the communication infrastructure for the Schengen environment (SISNET) and to manage such contracts, pending its migration to a communication infrastructure at the charge of the European Community.
Namestnik generalnega sekretarja Sveta je bil s Sklepom Sveta 1999/870/ES [1] in Sklepom 2007/149/ES [2] pooblaščen, da pri vključitvi schengenskega pravnega reda v okvir Evropske unije deluje kot zastopnik nekaterih držav članic pri sklepanju in upravljanju pogodb v zvezi s postavitvijo in delovanjem komunikacijske infrastrukture za schengensko okolje („SISNET“) pred prehodom na komunikacijsko infrastrukturo, ki bo bremenila Evropsko skupnost.
The financial obligations arising under those contracts are borne by a specific budget (hereinafter the SISNET Budget) financing the communication infrastructure referred to in those Council Decisions.
Finančne obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz teh pogodb, bremenijo poseben proračun (v nadaljevanju „proračun SISNET“) za financiranje komunikacijske infrastrukture, omenjene v teh sklepih Sveta.
The Swiss Confederation is to participate in the provisions of the Schengen acquis related to the Schengen Information System from a date to be set by the Council in accordance with Article 15(1) of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [3].
Švicarska konfederacija bo sodelovala pri določbah schengenskega pravnega reda, povezanih s schengenskim informacijskim sistemom, od datuma, ki ga bo določil Svet v skladu s členom 15(1) Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [3].
From that date, the Swiss Confederation should participate in the SISNET Budget,
Švicarska konfederacija bi od tega datuma morala prispevati sredstva v proračun SISNET –
Budget revenue shall consist of financial contributions from the following Member States: Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, as well as Iceland, Norway and Switzerland.’;
Proračunski prihodek sestavljajo finančni prispevki naslednjih držav članic: Avstrije, Belgije, Češke, Danske, Estonije, Finske, Francije, Grčije, Irske, Italije, Madžarske, Latvije, Litve, Luksemburga, Malte, Nemčije, Nizozemske, Poljske, Portugalske, Slovaške, Slovenije, Španije, Švedske, Združenega kraljestva ter Norveške, Islandije in Švice.“
Article 26 shall be replaced by the following:
Člen 26 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The states referred to in Article 25 shall supply their financial contributions to the Deputy Secretary-General.
Države iz člena 25 pošljejo svoje finančne prispevke namestniku generalnega sekretarja.
The scale of contributions to be paid by the Member States referred to in Article 25, on the one hand, and by Iceland, Norway and Switzerland, on the other hand, shall be calculated annually on the basis of the share of each Member State concerned and of Iceland, Norway and Switzerland, in the total gross domestic product (GDP) for the preceding year of all the States referred to in Article 25.
Višina prispevkov, ki jih plačajo države članice iz člena 25 na eni ter Islandija, Norveška in Švica na drugi strani, se izračuna letno na podlagi deleža vsake zadevne države članice ter Islandije, Norveške in Švice v skupnem bruto domačem proizvodu (BDP) za predhodno leto vseh držav iz člena 25.
The scale of contributions by the Member States concerned shall be calculated annually, taking into account the contributions of Iceland, Norway and Switzerland, on the basis of the ratio of the VAT resources paid by each of those Member States to the total VAT resources of the European Communities, as established in the last amendment of the budget of the Union during the preceding financial year.
Višina prispevkov zadevnih držav članic se izračuna letno ob upoštevanju prispevkov Islandije, Norveške in Švice ter na podlagi razmerja sredstev DDV, ki jih je vsaka zadevna država prispevala v skupna sredstva DDV Evropskih skupnosti, kakor je bilo določeno v zadnji spremembi proračuna Skupnosti v predhodnem proračunskem letu.
The additional costs resulting from the extension of the communication infrastructure to the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia shall not be borne by Ireland or the United Kingdom.’;
Irska in Združeno kraljestvo ne krijeta dodatnih stroškov, nastalih zaradi razširitve komunikacijske infrastrukture na Češko, Estonijo, Latvijo, Litvo, Madžarsko, Malto, Poljsko, Slovaško in Slovenijo.“
the following paragraph shall be added to Article 28:
V členu 28 se doda naslednji odstavek:
By way of derogation from paragraph 1, and without prejudice to Article 49, Switzerland shall be required to pay its initial contribution by 1 July 2008.’.
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 in brez poseganja v člen 49 je Švica svoj prvi prispevek dolžna plačati do 1. julija 2008.“
This Decision shall take effect from the date of its adoption.
Ta sklep začne učinkovati z dnem sprejetja.
Decision as last amended by Decision 2007/155/EC (OJ L 68, 8.3.2007, p. 5).
Sklep, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom 2007/155/ES (UL L 68, 8.3.2007, str. 5).
Council Decision 2000/265/EC [4] is hereby amended as follows:1.
Sklep Sveta 2000/265/ES [4] se spremeni, kakor sledi:1.
determining the quantities of methyl bromide permitted to be used for critical uses in the Community from 1 January to 31 December 2008 under Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer
o določitvi količin metilbromida, dovoljenih za nujno uporabo v Skupnosti od 1. januarja do 31. decembra 2008 v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2037/2000 o snoveh, ki tanjšajo ozonski plašč
(notified under document number C(2008) 1053)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2008) 1053)
(Only the Polish and Spanish texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v poljskem in španskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Articles 3(2)(i)(d) and 4(2)(i)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 prohibit the production, import and placing on the market of methyl bromide for all uses after 31 December 2004 except, among others [2], for critical uses in accordance with Article 3(2)(ii) and with the criteria set out in Decision IX/6 of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol, together with any other relevant criteria agreed by the Parties.
Člena 3(2)(i)(d) in 4(2)(i)(d) Uredbe (ES) št. 2037/2000 prepovedujeta proizvodnjo, uvoz in dajanje v promet metilbromida za vse uporabe po 31. decembru 2004, razen, med drugim [2], za nujno uporabo v skladu s členom 3(2)(ii) in merili, določenimi s Sklepom IX/6 pogodbenic Montrealskega protokola, skupaj z drugimi pomembnimi merili, o katerih so se dogovorile pogodbenice.
Decision IX/6 states that methyl bromide should qualify as ‘critical’ only if the applicant determines that the lack of availability of methyl bromide for that specific use would result in a significant market disruption; and that there are no technically and economically feasible alternatives or substitutes available to the user that are acceptable from the standpoint of environment and health and are suitable to the crops and circumstances of the nomination.
Sklep IX/6 navaja, da je metilbromid upravičen kot „nujen“ samo, če vlagatelj oceni, da bi nerazpoložljivost metilbromida za zadevno uporabo povzročila pomembnejše motnje na trgu in če uporabniku niso na voljo nobene tehnično ali ekonomsko izvedljive druge možnosti ali nadomestki, sprejemljivi z vidika okolja in zdravja ter primerne za pridelke in okoliščine iz zahtevka.
The Commission received six proposals for critical uses of methyl bromide from two Member States totalling 245146 kg, i.e. from Poland (12995 kg) and Spain (232151 kg).
Komisija je prejela šest predlogov za nujno uporabo merilbromida iz dveh držav članic, ki so znašali skupaj 245146 kg, in sicer iz Poljske (12995 kg) in iz Španije (232151 kg).
The Commission applied the criteria contained within Decision IX/6 and Article 3(2)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 in order to determine the amount of methyl bromide that is eligible to be licensed for critical uses in 2008.
Komisija je za določitev količine metilbromida, upravičenega do dovoljenja za nujno uporabo v letu 2008, uporabila merila iz Sklepa IX/6 in člena 3(2)(ii) Uredbe (ES) št. 2037/2000.
The Commission in consultation with Member States found that adequate alternatives were available in the Community and had become more prevalent in many Parties to the Montreal Protocol in the period since the critical use proposals were compiled by Member States.
Komisija je po posvetovanju z državami članicami ugotovila, da so v Skupnosti obstajale ustrezne druge možnosti, ki so jih mnoge pogodbenice Montrealskega protokola vse pogosteje uporabljale, odkar so države članice pripravile predloge za nujno uporabo.
As a result, the Commission determined that 212671 kg of methyl bromide can be used in 2008 to satisfy critical uses in each of the Member States that had requested the use of methyl bromide.
Zato je Komisija presodila, da se v letu 2008 lahko uporabi 212671 kg metilbromida za zadovoljitev nujne uporabe v vsaki navedeni državi članici, ki je zahtevala uporabo metilbromida.
This amount equates to 1,1 % of 1991 consumption of methyl bromide in the European Community and indicates that more than 98,9 % of the methyl bromide has been replaced by alternatives.
Ta količina je enaka 1,1 % uporabe metilbromida v Evropski skupnosti v letu 1991, kar pomeni, da so več kot 98,9 % metilbromida zamenjale druge snovi.
The critical-use categories are in line with to those defined in Table A of Decision XIX/9 at the Nineteenth Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol [3].
Kategorije nujne uporabe so v skladu s kategorijami, ki so določene v tabeli A iz Sklepa XIX/9 z devetnajstega srečanja pogodbenic Montrealskega protokola [3].
As Article 17(2) requires Member States to define the minimum qualification requirements for personnel involved in the application of methyl bromide and, as fumigation is the only use, the Commission determined that methyl bromide fumigators are the only users proposed by the Member State and authorised by the Commission to use methyl bromide for critical uses.
Člen 17(2) zahteva, da države članice določijo minimalne zahteve za usposobljenost osebja, ki uporablja metilbromid; ker se uporablja le za zaplinjevanje, je Komisija določila, da so edini uporabniki metilbromida za nujno uporabo, ki jih predlagajo države članice in odobri Komisija, zaplinjevalci.
Fumigators are qualified to apply it safely; Member States have put in place procedures to identify fumigators within their territory that are permitted to use methyl bromide for critical uses.
Usposobljeni morajo biti za varno uporabo; države članice so vzpostavile postopke za določitev zaplinjevalcev na njihovem ozemlju, ki lahko uporabljajo metilbromid za nujno uporabo.
In accordance with Decision IX/6 and Article 3(2)(ii), the Commission determined that 6296,744 kg of stocks were available for critical uses.
V skladu s Sklepom IX/6 in členom 3(2)(ii) je Komisija odločila, da je za nujno uporabo na voljo 6296,744 kg zalog.
Therefore, in addition to producers and importers, fumigators that are registered by the Commission in 2008 would be authorised to place methyl bromide on the market, and to use it for critical uses, after 31 December 2007.
Zato je poleg proizvajalcev in uvoznikov tudi zaplinjevalcem, ki so registrirani pri Komisiji v letu 2008, dovoljeno dajati v promet metilbromid in ga uporabljati za nujne potrebe po 31. decembru 2007.
Fumigators registered for critical uses by the Commission in 2007 would be permitted to carry over to 2008 any remaining methyl bromide that had not been used in 2007 (referred to as stocks).
Zaplinjevalcem, registriranim pri Komisiji v letu 2007, je za nujne uporabe dovoljeno v leto 2008 prenesti preostale količine metilbromida, ki niso bile uporabljene v letu 2007 (imenovane „zaloge“).
The European Commission has put in place licensing procedures to deduct such stocks of methyl bromide before any additional methyl bromide is imported or produced to meet the licensed requests for critical uses in 2008.
Evropska Komisija je vzpostavila postopke za izdajo dovoljenj za zmanjšanje zalog metilbromida, preden se uvozi ali proizvede dodatni metilbromid, da izpolni zahteve za dovoljenja za nujne uporabe v letu 2008.
As critical uses of methyl bromide apply from 1 January 2008, and for the purpose of ensuring that interested companies and operators may benefit from the licensing system, it is appropriate that this present decision shall apply from that date.
Ker nujne uporabe metilbromida veljajo od 1. januarja 2008 in da zainteresirane gospodarske družbe in izvajalci lahko uživajo ugodnosti sistema izdaje dovoljenj, je primerno, da se ta odločba uporablja od navedenega datuma.