natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
where there was no use provision in force prior to that date, the periods of five years mentioned in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 shall be deemed to run from that date at the earliest.
če pred tem datumom ni veljal noben predpis o uporabi, se šteje, da obdobja petih let iz prvega pododstavka odstavka 1 tečejo najmanj od tega datuma.
Sanctions for non-use of a trade mark in legal or administrative proceedings
Sankcije za neuporabo blagovne znamke v pravnih ali upravnih postopkih
A trade mark may not be declared invalid on the ground that there is an earlier conflicting trade mark if the latter does not fulfil the requirements of use set out in Article 10(1) and (2), or in Article 10(3), as the case may be.
Blagovna znamka se ne sme razglasiti za neveljavno na podlagi dejstva, da obstaja prejšnja blagovna znamka v koliziji z njo, če slednja ne izpolnjuje zahtev za uporabo iz člena 10(1) in (2) ali člena 10(3), kakor je ustrezno.
Any Member State may provide that registration of a trade mark may not be refused on the ground that there is an earlier conflicting trade mark if the latter does not fulfil the requirements of use set out in Article 10(1) and (2) or in Article 10(3), as the case may be.
Katerakoli država članica lahko določi, da se registracije blagovne znamke ne sme zavrniti na podlagi dejstva, da obstaja prejšnja blagovna znamka v koliziji z njo, če slednja ne izpolnjuje zahtev za uporabo iz člena 10(1) in (2) ali člena 10(3), kakor je ustrezno.
Without prejudice to the application of Article 12, where a counter-claim for revocation is made, any Member State may provide that a trade mark may not be successfully invoked in infringement proceedings if it is established as a result of a plea that the trade mark could be revoked pursuant to Article 12(1).
Brez poseganja v uporabo člena 12, če pride do nasprotne zahteve za razveljavitev, vsaka država članica lahko določi, da se blagovne znamke ne more uspešno uveljavljati v postopku zaradi kršitve pravic, če se na podlagi ugovora ugotovi, da bi se blagovna znamka lahko razveljavila na podlagi člena 12(1).
If the earlier trade mark has been used in relation to part only of the goods or services for which it is registered, it shall, for purposes of applying paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, be deemed to be registered in respect only of that part of the goods or services.
Če se je prejšnja blagovna znamka uporabljala le za del blaga ali storitev, za katere je registrirana, se za namene uporabe odstavkov 1, 2 in 3 šteje, da je registrirana le za ta del blaga ali storitev.
A trade mark shall be liable to revocation if, within a continuous period of five years, it has not been put to genuine use in the Member State in connection with the goods or services in respect of which it is registered, and there are no proper reasons for non-use.
Blagovna znamka se lahko razveljavi, če se v neprekinjenem obdobju petih let ni resno uporabljala v državah članicah v zvezi z blagom ali storitvami, za katere je registrirana, in za neuporabo ne obstajajo upravičeni razlogi.
However, no person may claim that the proprietor’s rights in a trade mark should be revoked where, during the interval between expiry of the five-year period and filing of the application for revocation, genuine use of the trade mark has been started or resumed.
Vendar nihče ne more zahtevati, naj se imetnikove pravice na blagovni znamki razveljavijo, če je v intervalu med iztekom petletnega obdobja in vložitvijo zahteve za razveljavitev prišlo do začetka ali ponovnega začetka resne uporabe blagovne znamke.
The commencement or resumption of use within a period of three months preceding the filing of the application for revocation which began at the earliest on expiry of the continuous period of five years of non-use shall be disregarded where preparations for the commencement or resumption occur only after the proprietor becomes aware that the application for revocation may be filed.
Začetek ali ponovni začetek uporabe v treh mesecih pred vložitvijo zahteve za razveljavitev, in najprej ob izteku neprekinjenega obdobja petih let neuporabe, pa se ne upošteva, če do priprav na začetek ali ponovni začetek pride šele potem, ko imetnik ugotovi, da lahko pride do vložitve zahteve za razveljavitev.
Without prejudice to paragraph 1, a trade mark shall be liable to revocation if, after the date on which it was registered:
Brez poseganja v odstavek 1 se blagovna znamka razveljavi, če po datumu registracije:
in consequence of acts or inactivity of the proprietor, it has become the common name in the trade for a product or service in respect of which it is registered;
zaradi dejanj ali opustitve imetnika v gospodarskem prometu postane obča oznaka za proizvod ali storitev, za katero je registrirana;
in consequence of the use made of it by the proprietor of the trade mark or with his consent in respect of the goods or services for which it is registered, it is liable to mislead the public, particularly as to the nature, quality or geographical origin of those goods or services.
zaradi uporabe s strani imetnika blagovne znamke ali z njegovim soglasjem glede blaga ali storitev, za katere je registrirana, lahko zavaja javnost, zlasti glede narave, kakovosti ali geografskega izvora tega blaga ali storitev.
Grounds for refusal or revocation or invalidity relating to only some of the goods or services
Razlogi za zavrnitev ali razveljavitev ali neveljavnost v zvezi z nekaterim blagom ali storitvami
Where grounds for refusal of registration or for revocation or invalidity of a trade mark exist in respect of only some of the goods or services for which that trade mark has been applied for or registered, refusal of registration or revocation or invalidity shall cover those goods or services only.
Če razlogi za zavrnitev ali razveljavitev ali neveljavnost blagovne znamke obstajajo le za nekatero blago ali storitve, za katere je bila ta blagovna znamka zahtevana ali registrirana, zavrnitev registracije ali razveljavitev ali neveljavnost obsega le tisto blago ali storitve.
Establishment a posteriori of invalidity or revocation of a trade mark
Naknadno ugotavljanje neveljavnosti ali razveljavitev blagovne znamke
Where the seniority of an earlier trade mark which has been surrendered or allowed to lapse is claimed for a Community trade mark, the invalidity or revocation of the earlier trade mark may be established a posteriori.
Če se prednost prejšnje blagovne znamke, ki se ji je imetnik odpovedal ali dopustil, da preneha, zahteva za blagovno znamko Skupnosti, se neveljavnost ali razveljavitev prejšnje blagovne znamke lahko ugotavlja naknadno.
Special provisions in respect of collective marks, guarantee marks and certification marks
Posebne določbe o kolektivnih znamkah, garancijskih znamkah in certifikacijskih znamkah
Without prejudice to Article 4, Member States whose laws authorise the registration of collective marks or of guarantee or certification marks may provide that such marks shall not be registered, or shall be revoked or declared invalid, on grounds additional to those specified in Articles 3 and 12 where the function of those marks so requires.
Brez poseganja v člen 4 lahko države članice, katerih zakoni predvidevajo registracijo kolektivnih znamk ali garancijskih ali certifikacijskih znamk, predvidijo, da se takšne znamke ne registrirajo oziroma se razveljavijo ali razglasijo za neveljavne ob dodatnih razlogih poleg tistih iz člena 3 in 12, če tako zahteva funkcija teh znamk.
By way of derogation from Article 3(1)(c), Member States may provide that signs or indications which may serve, in trade, to designate the geographical origin of the goods or services may constitute collective, guarantee or certification marks.
Z odstopanjem od člena 3(1)(c) lahko države članice določijo, da lahko znaki ali oznake, ki se v gospodarskem prometu lahko uporabljajo za označevanje geografskega izvora blaga ali storitev, sestavljajo kolektivne, garancijske ali certifikacijske znamke.
Such a mark does not entitle the proprietor to prohibit a third party from using in the course of trade such signs or indications, provided he uses them in accordance with honest practices in industrial or commercial matters; in particular, such a mark may not be invoked against a third party who is entitled to use a geographical name.
Takšna znamka imetniku ne daje pravice, da bi tretji osebi v gospodarskem prometu prepovedal uporabo takšnih znakov ali oznak, ob pogoju, da jih uporablja v skladu z dobrimi poslovnimi običaji; takšna pravica se zlasti ne sme uveljavljati proti tretji osebi, ki je upravičena do uporabe geografskega imena.
Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions of national law adopted in the field governed by this Directive.
Države članice posredujejo Komisiji besedila temeljnih predpisov nacionalne zakonodaje, sprejetih na področju, ki ga ureja ta direktiva.
Directive 89/104/EEC, as amended by the Decision listed in Annex I, Part A, is repealed, without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States relating to the time limit for transposition into national law of that Directive, set out in Annex I, Part B.
Direktiva 89/104/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena z odločbo, navedeno v Prilogi I, del A je razveljavljena, brez poseganja v obveznosti držav članic glede roka za prenos v nacionalno pravo navedene direktive, ki je določen v Prilogi I, del B.
References to the repealed Directive shall be construed as references to this Directive and shall be read in accordance with the correlation table in Annex II.
Sklici na razveljavljeno direktivo se upoštevajo kot sklici na to direktivo in se berejo v skladu s primerjalno tabelo v Prilogi II.
OJ C 161, 13.7.2007, p. 44.
UL C 161, 13.7.2007, str. 44.
Opinion of the European Parliament of 19 June 2007 (OJ C 146 E, 12.6.2008, p. 76) and Council Decision of 25 September 2008.
Mnenje Evropskega parlamenta z dne 19. junija 2007 (UL C 146 E, 12.6.2008, str. 76) in Sklep Sveta z dne 25. septembra 2008.
Council Directive 89/104/EEC
Direktiva Sveta 89/104/EGS
(OJ L 40, 11.2.1989, p. 1)
(UL L 40, 11.2.1989, str. 1)
Council Decision 92/10/EEC
Odločba Sveta 92/10/EGS
(OJ L 6, 11.1.1992, p. 35)
(UL L 6, 11.1.1992, str. 35)
Time limit for transposition into national law
Roki za prenos v nacionalno pravo
89/104/EEC
89/104/EGS
Directive 89/104/EEC
Direktiva 89/104/EGS
Article 3(1)(a) to (d)
Člen 3(1)(a) do (d)
Article 3(1)(e), introductory wording
Člen 3(1)(e), uvodno besedilo
Article 3(1)(e), first indent
Člen 3(1)(e), prva alinea
Article 3(1)(e)(i)
Člen 3(1)(e)(i)
Article 3(1)(e), second indent
Člen 3(1)(e), druga alinea
Article 3(1)(e)(ii)
Člen 3(1)(e)(ii)
Article 3(1)(e), third indent
Člen 3(1)(e), tretja alinea
Article 3(1)(e)(iii)
Člen 3(1)(e)(iii)
Article 3(1)(f), (g) and (h)
Člen 3(1)(f)(g) in (h)
Article 3(2), (3) and (4)
Člen 3(2), (3) in (4)
Article 10(1), first subparagraph
Člen 10(1), prvi pododstavek
Article 10(1), second subparagraph
Člen 10(1), drugi pododstavek
Article 12(1), first sentence
Člen 12(1), prvi stavek
Article 12(1), first subparagraph
Člen 12(1), prvi pododstavek
Article 12(1), second sentence
Člen 12(1), drugi stavek
Article 12(1), second subparagraph
Člen 12(1), drugi pododstavek
Article 12(1), third sentence
Člen 12(1), tretji stavek
Article 12(1), third subparagraph
Člen 12(1), tretji pododstavek
Article 16(1) and (2)
Člen 16(1) in (2)
Directive 2008/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2008/96/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on road infrastructure safety management
o izboljšanju varnosti cestne infrastrukture
The trans-European road network defined in Decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network [3], is of paramount importance in supporting European integration and cohesion as well as ensuring a high level of well-being.
Vseevropsko prometno omrežje, opredeljeno v Odločbi št. 1692/96/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. julija 1996 o smernicah Skupnosti za razvoj vseevropskega prometnega omrežja [3], je največjega pomena pri spodbujanju evropske integracije in kohezije ter pri zagotavljanju visoke ravni blagostanja.
In particular, a high level of safety should be guaranteed.
Zlasti je treba zagotoviti visoko raven varnosti.
In its White Paper of 12 September 2001‘European transport policy for 2010: time to decide’ the Commission expressed the need to carry out safety impact assessments and road safety audits, in order to identify and manage high accident concentration sections within the Community.
V svoji beli knjigi z dne 12. septembra 2001 z naslovom „Evropska prometna politika za leto 2010: čas za odločitev“ je Komisija izrazila potrebo po izvedbi ocene učinka na varnost in preverjanj varnosti v cestnem prometu za določitev in upravljanje cestnih odsekov v Skupnosti, kjer se zgodi veliko nesreč.
It also set the target of halving the number of deaths on the roads within the European Union between 2001 and 2010.
Zastavila si je tudi cilj, da bo razpolovila število smrtnih žrtev na cestah v Evropski uniji med letoma 2001 in 2010.
In its Communication of 2 June 2003‘European Road Safety Action Programme, Halving the number of road accident victims in the European Union by 2010: A shared responsibility’ the Commission identified road infrastructure as the third pillar of road safety policy, which should make an important contribution to the Community’s accident reduction target.
V svojem sporočilu z dne 2. junija 2003 z naslovom „Evropski akcijski program za varnost v cestnem prometu, Razpolovitev števila žrtev prometnih nesreč v Evropski uniji do leta 2010: skupna odgovornost“ je Komisija cestno infrastrukturo označila za tretji steber politike varnosti v cestnem prometu, kar naj bi pomembno prispevalo k cilju Skupnosti za zmanjšanje nesreč.
In recent years, major advances have been made in vehicle design (safety measures and the development and application of new technologies) which have helped to reduce the number of people killed or injured in road accidents.
V zadnjih letih je razvoj vozil izredno napredoval (varnostni ukrepi, načrtovanje in uporaba novih tehnologij), kar je pripomoglo k zmanjšanju števila mrtvih in ranjenih v prometnih nesrečah.
If the target set for 2010 is to be achieved, action must be taken in other areas too.
Vendar je treba za doseganje cilja, zastavljenega za leto 2010, ukrepati tudi na drugih področjih.
Managing the safety of road infrastructure offers plenty of scope for improvement, which must be used to advantage.
Na področju varnosti cestne infrastrukture je še veliko možnosti za izboljšave, ki jih je treba uresničiti.
The setting up of appropriate procedures is an essential tool for improving the safety of road infrastructure within the trans-European road network.
Vzpostavitev ustreznih postopkov je bistveno orodje za izboljšanje varnosti cestne infrastrukture v okviru vseevropskega cestnega omrežja.
Road safety impact assessments should demonstrate, on a strategic level, the implications on road safety of different planning alternatives of an infrastructure project and they should play an important role when routes are being selected.
Ocene učinkov na varnost v cestnem prometu bi morale v fazi načrtovanja prikazati učinke različnih možnosti načrtovanja infrastrukturnega projekta na varnost v cestnem prometu in imeti pomembno vlogo pri izbiri poti.
The results of road safety impact assessments may be set out in a number of documents.
Rezultati ocenjevanja varnostnih učinkov se lahko zabeležijo v več dokumentih.
Moreover, road safety audits should identify, in a detailed way, unsafe features of a road infrastructure project.
Preverjanja varnosti v cestnem prometu bi morala podrobneje opredeliti nevarnosti cestne infrastrukture.
It therefore makes sense to develop procedures to be followed in those two fields with the aim of increasing safety of road infrastructures on the trans-European road network, whilst at the same time excluding road tunnels which are covered by Directive 2004/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on minimum safety requirements for tunnels in the trans-European road network [4].
Zato je smiselno, da se razvijejo postopki, ki se bodo upoštevali na navedenih dveh področjih, da bi se doseglo povečanje varnosti cestne infrastrukture na vseevropskem cestnem omrežju in hkrati izključilo cestne predore, ki jih zajema Direktiva 2004/54/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o minimalnih varnostnih zahtevah za predore v vseevropskem cestnem omrežju [4].
Several Member States already possess well functioning road infrastructure safety management systems.
Številne države članice že imajo dobro delujoče sisteme za izboljšanje varnosti cestne infrastrukture.
These countries should be permitted to continue using their existing methods, in so far as they are consistent with the aims of this Directive.
Tem državam bi moralo biti dovoljeno, da nadalje uporabljajo svoje obstoječe metode, če so v skladu s cilji te direktive.
Research is vital to improving safety on the roads within the European Union.
Raziskave so nujne za izboljšanje varnosti na cestah v Evropski uniji.
Developing and demonstrating components, measures and methods (including telematics) and disseminating research results play an important part in increasing the safety of road infrastructure.
Pri povečanju varnosti cestne infrastrukture imajo lahko pomembno vlogo oblikovanje in prikaz komponent, ukrepov in metod (vključno s telematiko) in razširjanje rezultatov raziskav.
Safety performance of existing roads should be raised by targeting investments to the road sections with the highest accident concentration and/or the highest accident reduction potential.
Treba je izboljšati varnost obstoječih cest z usmerjanjem naložb v odseke, kjer se zgodi največ prometnih nesreč in/ali kjer obstaja največja možnost za zmanjšanje števila nesreč.
To be able to adapt their behaviour and increase compliance with traffic rules, in particular speed limits, drivers should be made aware of road sections with a high accident concentration.
Da bi vozniki lahko prilagodili svoje vedenje in povečali upoštevanje prometnih predpisov, zlasti omejitev hitrosti, bi jih bilo treba opozoriti na cestne odseke, kjer se zgodi veliko prometnih nesreč.
Network safety ranking has a high potential immediately after its implementation.
Razvrščanje varnosti omrežja ima velik učinek takoj po začetku izvajanja.
Once road sections with a high accident concentration have been treated and remedial measures have been taken, safety inspections as a preventive measure should assume a more important role.
Ko bodo obravnavani cestni odseki, kjer se zgodi veliko prometnih nesreč, in ko bodo sprejeti popravni ukrepi, bodo morali inšpekcijski pregledi varnosti kot preventivni ukrepi prevzeti bolj pomembno vlogo.
Regular inspections are an essential tool for preventing possible dangers for all road users, including vulnerable users, and also in case of roadworks.
Redni inšpekcijski pregledi so bistveni pri preprečevanju morebitnih nevarnosti za vse uporabnike cest, vključno z ranljivimi uporabniki, tudi v primeru dela na cesti.
Training and certification of safety personnel by means of training curricula and tools for qualification validated by the Member States should ensure that practitioners get the necessary up-to-date knowledge.
Usposabljanje in certificiranje varnostnega osebja s pomočjo učnih načrtov usposabljanja in metodami za ugotavljanje usposobljenosti, ki jih potrdijo države članice, morata omogočiti, da bodo strokovni delavci pridobili potrebno najnovejše znanje.
With a view to improving safety on the roads within the European Union, arrangements should be made for more frequent and more consistent exchanges of best practices among the Member States.
Za izboljšanje varnosti na cestah v Evropski uniji je treba zagotoviti pogostejšo in doslednejšo izmenjavo najboljših praks med državami članicami.
In order to ensure a high level of road safety on the roads within the European Union Member States should apply guidelines on infrastructure safety management.
Za zagotovitev visoke ravni varnosti v cestnem prometu na cestah v Evropski uniji morajo države članice uporabiti smernice o izboljšanju varnosti infrastrukture.
The notification of those guidelines to the Commission and regular reporting on their implementation should pave the way for the systematic improvement of infrastructure safety at Community level and provide a basis for the evolution towards a more effective system over time.
Uradno obveščanje Komisije o teh smernicah in redno poročanje o njihovem izvajanju mora utreti pot do sistematičnega izboljšanja varnosti infrastrukture na ravni Skupnosti in sčasoma zagotoviti podlago za razvoj učinkovitejšega sistema.
The reporting on their implementation should, furthermore, allow other Member States to identify the most effective solutions, while the systematic collection of data from before/after studies should allow selecting the most effective measure for future action.
Poročanje o njihovem izvajanju mora poleg tega drugim državam članicam omogočiti določitev najučinkovitejših rešitev, medtem ko mora sistematično zbiranje podatkov iz raziskav o stanju pred in po izvajanju omogočiti izbiro najučinkovitejšega sredstva za prihodnje ukrepe.
The provisions of this Directive which relate to investment in road safety should apply without prejudice to the Member States’ powers as regards investment in the upkeep of the road network.
Določbe te direktive v zvezi z naložbami v varnost v cestnem prometu bi se brez poseganja v pristojnosti držav članic morale uporabljati za naložbe v vzdrževanje cestnega omrežja.
Since the objective of this Directive namely the establishment of procedures to ensure a consistently high level of road safety throughout the trans-European road network cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the effects of the action, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Ker države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči ciljev te direktive, namreč vzpostavitev postopkov za zagotovitev visoke ravni varnosti v cestnem prometu v celotnem vseevropskem cestnem omrežju, in ker je zaradi učinkov ukrepa cilj mogoče bolje doseči na ravni Skupnosti, lahko Skupnost sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
Skladno z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne prekoračuje okvirov, ki so potrebni za doseganje teh ciljev.
The measures necessary for the implementation of this Directive should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission [5].
Ukrepe, potrebne za izvajanje te direktive, je treba sprejeti v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o postopkih za izvajanje izvedbenih pooblastil, dodeljenih Komisiji [5].
In particular the Commission should be empowered to adopt the criteria necessary for the improvement of road safety management practices and the adaptation of the annexes to technical progress.
Zlasti bi bilo treba Komisiji podeliti pooblastila za sprejetje meril, potrebnih za izboljšanje praks varnosti cestne infrastrukture in za prilagoditev prilog tehničnemu napredku.
Since those measures are of general scope and are designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, inter alia, by supplementing it with new non-essential elements, they must be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC.
Ker so navedeni ukrepi splošnega obsega in so namenjeni spreminjanju nebistvenih določb te uredbe, med drugim z njenim dopolnjevanjem z novimi nebistvenimi določbami, jih je treba sprejeti v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 5a Sklepa 1999/468/ES.